Life On Earth Was Created By God

I reject that life on earth was created by god. I reject that "some deity created the universe. " Life on earth most likely originated by way of abiogenesis. Abiogenesis is the fact that organic compounds can come from inorganic compounds. Compounds covalently (sharing electrons) bonded to carbon are organic. Compounds not covalently bonded to carbon are inorganic. Inorganic = H N C O (cyanate) Organic = C 2 H 5 N O 2 (glycine, an amino acid) You can tell that the difference between inorganic and organic carbon compounds is rather insignificant. One more carbon atom, four more hydrogen atoms, and one more oxygen atom. .. that's it. The Miller-Urey experiment in the 50's demonstrated that with an atmosphere, water salinity, electricity, and inorganic compounds likely of an earlier earth, inorganic compounds will produce organic amino acid compounds. . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... Though people agreed that lightning occurs without life and in atmospheres on other planets, people still complained that the atmosphere of earlier earth had more oxygen than the Miller-Urey experiment accounted for. The replicated experiments of the Miller-Urey took that into account, and used: 1. H2, CH4, NH3, H2O, H2S and electricity, and yielded the amino acids cysteine, cystine, and methionine 2. CH4, C2H6, NH3, H2S and UV rays, and yielded alanine, glycine, serine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and cystine 3. CH4, H2O, H2S, NH3, N2, and electricity, and yielded methionine . http://www.pnas.org... "When reduced gases, including CH4, H2S and NH3, are emitted from a volcano into a lightning-rich atmosphere, hydrogen cyanide, ethylene, and acetylene can be generated. " . http://www.pnas.org... So we know that amino acids, organic compounds, can come from inorganic compounds. But what about genetic replication? Amino acid chains (polypeptides) can fold onto themselves and become biologically active. According to the NIH: "The sequence of the amino acid chain causes the polypeptide to fold into a shape that is biologically active. " . http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov... So we have biologically active amino acids. .. how do they replicate? Well amino acids tend to speed up reactions; they're catalysts. So before there was life, there were pre-biotic catalysts, amino acids. "catalysis in a pre-biotic network initiated. .. the emergence of RNA as the dominant macromolecule due to its ability to both catalyze chemical reactions and to be copied in a template-directed manner. " . https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... So, from inorganic compounds of earlier earth, we got organic amino acids, which, when folded, become biologically active, and can catalyze reactions that lead to the emergence of RNA, which is necessary for genetic replication. Any primitive organism would be replicating with RNA and metabolizing with amino acids, but what might they be consuming? "Sixty years after the seminal Miller-Urey experiment that abiotically produced a mixture of racemized amino acids, we provide a definite proof that this primordial soup, when properly cooked, was edible for primitive organisms. " . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... Given all of the evidence, abiogenesis is likely how life originated on earth, which really does not require a god or deity. Pro may try to claim that "some deity" used abiogenesis to create life, but Pro would have to explain the mechanism "some deity" used to execute abiogenesis. Furthermore, if Pro is to claim that "some deity" is god, per this debate, then Pro needs to explain the mechanism used by god that makes this god the creator of the universe; Pro can't just say that "some diety" used the big bang, rather Pro needs to mechanistically explain HOW god used the big bang. For these reasons, life on earth was not created by a god.