The evil that is Islam

This is a debate whereby I have, so far, mainly adopted the falsification principle as a means to spearhead my rebuttal to your fallacious argument. Clearly you are unaware of such a method, and I also do not appreciate your radical assumption that I am a Muslim or "Islamist". Again, this reflects your speculative, baseless and irrelevant approach to the question of Islam"s morality, and this is further supported by your failure to respond to my coherent, logical argument at the end of round 2. What I find amusing is how far you have strayed from the topic we are debating, that is, the question of Islam"s morality and not the Science of the Qu"ran or its infallibility. You have failed to address the moral question and therefore, rather than spend time on correcting your hasty generalisations of Islam and addressing your irrelevant and misleading reference to the Qu"ran"s scientific facts, I will concentrate on my building the argument I developed at the end of round 2. Firstly, I shall again state that it is a truism of Islam that its 5 pillars encompass all the fundamental teachings of the Qu"ran, its single, holy text. Through the Qu"ran, which you admit does not advocate terrorist attacks; we can determine whether or not Islam is objectively evil, because it is believed to be the absolute word of God which all Muslims must follow in order to be recognised as faithful. The 5 pillars, which all Muslims must practice, I shall state again: the Shahadah (declaration of faith: "there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger"), Zakat (alms-giving,), Hajj (pilgrimage), Sawm (Fasting) and Salah (5 daily prayers). Each of these pillars either alleviate suffering or increase happiness; none of them have the quality of instigating suffering or decreasing happiness. The majority of Muslims put faith into practice in this way in a peaceful manner as this provides a moral framework for them and a spiritual enlightenment. It is a pure connection to the God they believe in. Furthermore, it is an intrinsic property of the actions themselves that, should they be practiced, only "Good" is the result. Thus, they can be considered moral and therefore, Islam as a religion cannot be regarded as objectively evil. Perhaps by summarising your argument thus far in three key steps I can demonstrate your incoherency: 1.There are as many as "20,000" attacks committed by people in the name of Islam. 2.Evidence (in the form of anti-Islamic websites) demonstrates this "deadly terrorism" since 9/11. 3.Therefore, Islam is objectively evil. Any rational mind cannot deny your first premise, although the numerical value cited can be questioned for accuracy. The people know that these attacks have occurred, just as equally as they know similar attacks occur through non-Muslims (note that I am not suggesting that so-called "Islamist" terrorists can be defined as "Muslims"). A rational mind would question your second premise and its citations; given that they are anti-Islamic and therefore bias in their argumentation. Your main conclusion, that Islam is objectively evil, does not follow from your premises. This is partly due to the hasty generalisation and inability to provide absolute proof through its holy text. In conclusion, in spite of your radical assumptions, incoherence and irrelevant comments, I believe that I have done well in this round to focus on my own argument, that Islam is not objectively evil.