The Theory of Evolution is False

Thank You Con, Now, my opponent claims that my argument is 'surprisingly weak' when in fact that statement is some what hypocritical. This is not an insult debate though, and would like to refrain from that. So I will just begin-The Witnesses of Evolution My opponent states when talking about the time process of evolution, and I quote, "The process operates so slowly that it is not observable except over thousands or hundreds of years," Therefore, my opponent is stating that evolution is too slow to observe in a human life time. Then goes on to say that since God was never witnessed (Although he was, I will get in to this in a second) nobody can say for sure that he created the universe. So, if an un-witnessed God is not true, how is an un-witnessed theory? Evolution may actually have been witnessed, but never directly seen, Nobody has had a first hand account of seeing evolution in action, but they have with Jesus. Jesus has been described as a historical figure not only in the Holy Bible, but other history books in the world, and has been described in numerous different languages. Evolution, unlike religious theories like God, has never been witnessed first hand by a human. No human has directly seen it happen. How did evolution start?I asked my opponent to describe the first cell of evolution to me in the second round, in which I would like to point out, my opponent never did. Now, there is reasoning for this in, yes my opponent's side of the argument and I will state it. My opponent says that evolution is a continuing cycle, and a continuing cycle is a circular type cycle with no beginning or end. There's no start or stop at any given point. My opponent specifically says, "Evolution doesn't start or stop at any given point," Now, this is a statement in which I believe can not be applied to a theory like evolution. Evolution is not a circular type path in which all animals are in. If you, then humans would either be evolving as we speak, which isn't true, because we have had humans as we know for over two thousand years (More than enough time to evolve) or they would begin to evolve in to a lower form, which like I just said, they have enough time. Evolution is not something that goes in a circle, things do not evolve up to a higher form then begin to evolve in to a lower being. Therefore, evolution must have a beginning.Now that I have responded accordingly to my opponents claims, I can go in to one last topic I would like to bring up as a point to disprove evolution. Species without a link Now, evolution may provide reasons for how organisms such as humans, birds, dogs, ect. got here, but there are also a lot of animals "without a link" On the website http://www.abovetopsecret.com..., there's a page titled. "Ten Scientific Facts: Evolution is False and Impossible" I would encourage all of you to read all ten facts on the site, it is very informative, but fact number two is the one I would like to draw attention to. It reads- "The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic and scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar looking species and claim they evolved one to another. Humans are a great example. There are hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Petrified skulls and bones exist from these creatures. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture. This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes and elephants. These pictures are placed in all evolutionists' text books to teach kids this nonsense. The picture is simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution."There are species without a link! Evolution is a theory which can not account for all animals, which leads me to the question, "How did those animals get there?" Now, with the new argument and response to my opponent's claims, I turn the debate over to my opponent. Thank you.Source-http://www.abovetopsecret.com...