The Republican Party

I think that a woman has the right to kill a fetus if she wants to. Not a baby. A fetus. The thing doesn't gain consciousness until it comes out of the womb. Maybe a little before that. I'd say months one through five are perfectly acceptable times to pull a baby out of the womb. Having a child to take care of is an immense responsibility. If parents cannot afford to take care of their children, then they have to get rid of their child somehow. The fetus is alive and human, but it is not born, and its mind is only developing. I do not fail to recognize that there are other options besides abortion. Adoption is one option. Abortion should be another option. Abortion is a great way to control the population. Would you want the human race to explode with no limits? Some parents are against adoption. By insisting that abortion is not a viable option, you're using the "false dilemma" fallacy. By insisting that human fetuses have emotions without justifying you claim, you're employing the "appeal to emotion" fallacy. From this round on, I'll provide more sources. I love the way you employ fallacies so often, sir. It's fun to catch you in the act. It might sound strange, but many parents would rather kill their child in the womb than have the kid and then hand him off to complete strangers. Adoption involves weeks of stressful paperwork and decision making. Adoption is quick and easy, and new and better birth control methods are being thought up every day. You cannot say that fetuses are entitled to life without backing that claim up. You're committing petitio principii. Democrats do, in fact, reduce the number of abortions, but we also allow women to willfully get abortions if they want. If poor people get more tax money from rich people, they will be able to bring up children better. being poor is not a "poor decision". Poor people do not make the choice to be poor. They are poor because rich people have all the money. Poor people should depend on the government for money. The government should be held responsible for poverty levels. Imagine what life today would be like if FDR hadn't implemented the "New Deal" after the Great Depression. We'd still be standing in soup lines. https://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.bbc.co.uk... https://www.history.com... http://www.businessinsider.com... I notice that you say there was a "recent study" which reported that climate change is a hoax, or, at the very least, hyperbole. Please, sir, in the next round, give me an article about this study. I'd like to know about it, since it is, according to you, very much real. Like Flat Earthers and Scientologists, you confuse NONNEGOTIABLE FACT with DEBATABLE OPINION. It cannot be denied that Carbon Dioxide, a gas produced by Fossil Fuel burning, traps sunlight within the atmosphere and melts Earth's ice. While you try and dig up that fabricated scientific article, here's some real statistics to chew on: https://upload.wikimedia.org... As you can see from this graph, the Earth's temperature skyrocketed at roughly the same time we discovered that coal could be burned to create electricity- and then refused to use more efficient, reusable methods like Nuclear or Solar. The temperature of today is not natural- it has never been this warm before, except in dinosaur times, when carbon was released from volcanoes and geysers- and be assured, that climate was by no means suitable for human life. If you want to die, then go ahead and deny it. Soon, we Democrats will be laughing up our sleeves- but, of course, we'll all pay the prie for your stupidity. Denying the effects of CO2 on our atmosphere is like denying that cigarettes give people lung cancer. https://en.wikipedia.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... Guns are not a necessity. If you live in a region where criminal activity is common, then you should move out. Democratic states, by far, are less crime ridden. Compare the conditions of Colfax Avenue in Denver to the conditions of Miami. Florida is a Republican State. Colorado is a Democratic state. Colfax can be traversed easily. Crime is not common in Colorado. It serves as a safe haven for those who believe in gay rights and marijuana. Miami, on the other hand, is filled with drug peddlers and prostitutes. Why? because republicans ruin every state they control. Criminals would not be a threat if people did not have guns. Your hypothetical situation only works in a world where the world cannot change. Think about this for a moment. It might seem counterintuitive to your puny mind, but it makes sense. If guns were banned- removed from every city, no longer bought and sold- then there would be no need to protect yourself anymore. There would be no criminal busting into your house at night. Would you rather prolong having a bad neighborhood by temporarily saving your family- or do you want to end gun violence for all time? You wouldn't have a gun, sure- but neither would the criminal. Guns are very efficient killing machines- more efficient than knives or clubs. It takes about the same amount of time to call 911 as it does to find a gun. And let's face it- not having guns would actually give you MORE of a chance against that criminal. Instead of hitting yourselves with bullets, you could just fist fight until the cops arrive. I would be less dangerous, less destructive to your home- and you wouldn't have a body on your hands in the end. If humans didn't have guns, just imagine what a nicer place the world would be. There would be no criminals. You wouldn't be able to defend yourself, but you wouldn't need to. Do you support violence? Don't you think violence should end? Here's a table of all murders in the U.S. You can't deny that most of them are caused by guns. https://ucr.fbi.gov... Here's a reasonable argument by my favorite YouTuber, Videos for People: The United States is not an authoritarian Hellhole. It is one of the nicest places to live in the whole world. An authoritarian government might happen someday, but it does not exist. You are dreaming up perceived threats where there are none. You cannot destroy violence with violence. Paranoid schizophrenics like yourself are the kind of people who commit shootings, because you see danger where there is no danger. Do you live in Call of Duty, sir? The real world is not Call of Duty, as far as I know, and the American government is not anything like the Nazi Germany government. Just so long as we have good law enforcement and speedy ambulances, we do not need guns. We should progress past weapons. We should not continue to use them. Do you lack the imagination to envision a world without weapons? Rich people do hate Poor people. If Rich people did like Poor people, they would become Democrats and pay reasonable taxes. Democrats do support policies that better the lives of poor people. They do not better the lives of Rich people, because Rich people already have good lives. Obamacare gave cheap medical assistance to millions. We do not do damage. Democrats do not make people "Economically Dependent" on Government money, we simply pull them out of a hole and then see how well they can live on their own. Selfishness and greed are not virtues, sir. They are Vices. There's nothing WRONG with being Economically dependent on the Government. The Government is, after all, responsible for the Welfare of its citizens, and if thousands of Citizens starve to death out on the streets- well, then the Government must be held responsible for that. Not everybody can fix their lives easily, sir. If your economic theories worked, then there would be no Poor people. They'd all be doing OK. can you deny the existence of Poor people? You can't, can you? This is simple, sir, so simple that I think a Kindergartner could comprehend it. less is not more. Money is necessary to live, and if a person has no money, they cannot live. It is not because of poor decisions they made. Well, it could be that they didn't vote for Hillary. But, apart from that, they are poor because Rich people have most of the money. It's that simple, sir. You can't deny it. Not every Poor person is poor due to alcoholism or lotto tickets. Some poor people have no addictions, they are poor simply because their schools weren't funded enough from taxes that could have been paid by rich people- or maybe they were hungry because their incomes were low. Being poor is not a choice. Poverty and Wealth are inherited from generation to generation. You're selfish. Very selfish, to turn your back like that. One last thing- In the next round, I'd like to go over marijuana, gay rights, and Black Lives Matter, for a while. Otherwise, carry on with the topics as before. I'll be waiting, sir. Your logic is very, very flawed. I hope I'll straighten you out eventually.