The Theory of Evolution is Racism

My opponent is attempting to discredit my definition of Racism. I would like to remind my opponent that it is not my definition but rather it is The American Heritageï¿½ Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Definition. If my opponent has issue with the definition perhaps he should take issue with the publisher. Further the definition of Character and Ability is not merely physical as you have suggested. Citing mere physical differences between races misses the point entirely and of course you have to take the definition as a whole to be accurate, I never suggested you shouldn't. My opponent is correct in saying that different races have different physical traits, however evolution takes it to the next level in that the superior traits will cause the species to evolve to a more superior species. You see evolution suggest that Microevolution, small changes with in species, will eventually with time lead to macroevolution. Now my opponent has listed several microevolution changes which are observable, this in it self is not racist because the changes stay with in a species and we always have equality as the same species, when you throw in Evolutionary Theory however you look at things entirely different. You accept that a new species will evolve and the species that don't evolve are now something less. You now have the potential for lets say White man to become a new species and Black man to continue his human species or simply that a White man is further up the Evolutionary ladder. You now have a break with two separate species, which could be paralleled with Ape and Man. I of course don't mean to encourage black/white racism I'm simply using this argument for illustrative purposes. Evolutionist don't believe ape came from man, they believe man came from ape and with that understanding the new species to evolve won't be from Africans. Why? Well there is enormous scientific evidence and myocardial dna proves that man was originally black in Africa. I see white skin as a negative genetic mutation that can be lived with and a lot of sunscreen! Of course Evolutionist sees it as an adaptation. This is an obvious racist belief on the part of Evolutionist. Primate to Black Man to White Man to New Future Species? This is no doubt how many evolutionist have viewed the future events of evolution and that is racist. That is why if you accept Evolution you must accept your own racism. I would like to note a few flaws, though they don't matter much, in my opponents examples of thick hair growth in cold regions. This may be true to some degree just by happenstance, however the Eskimos have very thin hair and don't/can't typically grow facial hair. My last 2 contentions are not a genetic fallacy. I think this is simply a side step on behalf of my opponent. DEFINITION Genetic Fallacy; is a conclusion that is suggested based solely on something or someone's origin rather than its current meaning or context. This overlooks any difference to be found in the present situation. My last 2 contentions are not genetic fallacy's because they still apply to the CURRENT MEANING and CONTEXT of The Theory of Evolution. I have demonstrated the logical current context of The Theory of Evolution in my first contention.