The Bible Does Not Make Being Gay wrong

So you just supported the fact that Christianity does not have to follow the Old Testament. Therefore Leviticus stating "A man laying with another man is a detestable act" is completely irrelevant to them. Because not once does Jesus mention Gays as an abomination. If they were an abomination in the eyes of God Jesus would have said something about them, But he doesn't not once. Can you explain that to me? Here is something for you to look at and think about. For whoever keeps the whole Law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. (James 2:10) So you choose to keep and follow that being Gay is an abomination, but you break other verses in the Testament according to James 2:10 that is just as bad as breaking all of the laws. "There is, however, a big problem with quoting Leviticus. The problem is that Christians are no longer under the Law. We do not live our Christian life by following the Old Testament Law. The Apostle Paul makes this abundantly clear. It is not something fabricated to win an argument, or made up in the twentieth century, or manufactured to get around something somebody doesn't like. It is clearly stated in the Greek scriptures. "All who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written: "Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law." (Galatians 3:10)" I know for a fact the Church does not follow everything in the Old testament today as I have pointed out a few times in my other arguments. So according to Galatians 3:10 we all must be cursed! quite silly I must say. "According to Paul"s statement below, things have changed. "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law by becoming a curse for us. (Galatians 3:13)" It was Jesus" death on the cross that rescued us from the curse of the Law. If we insist on following the Law and imposing the Law on others, we negate the cross of Christ, and repudiate Christ"s death on the cross." Interesting how yet another quote from the Bible states the old law as a curse to us. "It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery. (Galatians 5:1)" "If you insist that other people observe the Law, then you are burdening people "again by a yoke of slavery," which makes you a slave master. When people resist your attempt to place them under the Law, they are acting in accordance with the urging of Paul, "Do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery." "But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under law. (Galatians 5:18)." "You Cannot Observe the Law and Walk in the Spirit Simultaneously" A mature Christian cannot be led by the Spirit and follow the Law simultaneously. This is an example of "serving two masters," which Christ said was impossible. In the Greek scriptures Paul urges us to walk in the Spirit, to be filled with the Spirit, to keep in step with the Spirit, and warn us against the bondage to the Law. We can"t live life in the Spirit if the Law has us in chains." Can you explain these Bible quotes that tell us that the old law is a curse? Ones which contradict following leviticus? Ones who say that Jesus our Lord and Savior has freed from the curse of the old law? Also the term Homoexuality was not put into the Bible until 1946. Are they talking a man just having sex with a man as many idol worshipers did back then or were they talking about long loving relationships between a man and another man? "Homosexuality is briefly mentioned in only six or seven of the Bible"s 31,173 verses." "The fact that homosexuality is so rarely mentioned in the Bible should be an indication to us of the lack of importance ascribed it by the authors of the Bible." "While the Bible is nearly silent on homosexuality, a great deal of its content is devoted to how a Christian should behave. Throughout, the New Testament insists upon fairness, equity, love, and the rejection of legalism over compassion. If heterosexual Christians are obligated to look to the Bible to determine the sinfulness of homosexual acts, how much greater is their obligation to look to the Bible to determine the sinfulness of their behavior toward gay persons." "Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law. The commandments, "You shall not commit adultery," "You shall not murder," "You shall not steal," "You shall not covet," and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: "Love your neighbor as yourself." Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law " Romans 13:8-10 Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all. Therefore, as God"s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience. Bear with each other and forgive one another if any of you has a grievance against someone. Forgive as the Lord forgave you " Colossians 3:11-13 Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices"mint, dill and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law"justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former. You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel. " Matthew 23: 23-24" Interesting how the Bible says you shall love thy neighbor not you shall love thy neighbor unless they are homosexual. If you can answer any of these or show how they cannot argue against the bibles statement on gays please do. "Even a sin as heinous as murder we do not judge without first taking into account the context in which it occurred. Self-defense, protection of the innocent, during a war"we recognize that there are times when taking the life of another is not only not a sin, but a morally justified and even heroic act. Christians evaluate the degree of sin, or even whether or not a real sin has occurred, by looking at both the harm caused by the sin, and the intent of the sin"s perpetrator. They do, that is, for all sins except homosexuality." "It is important to understand that even the most fundamentalist Christian sects do not take the Bible wholly literally. The New Testament is two thousand years old, the old Testament much older. The Bible"s cultural contexts, along with the translation at hand, is always taken into consideration by any Christian serious about understanding this vast and complex work. To excerpt any isolated short passage from the Bible, and then claim for that passage absolute authority, is to fail to take the Bible on its own terms. If we wish to follow the word of God, then we must take the entirety of God"s words into account." In conclusion a short quote cannot be enough to make being gay wrong. we have culturally and as people have changed. Something written over 2,000 years ago cannot be held as enough information to discriminate against a group of people.