Homosexuality Is Immoral!

I must start by acknowledging the graciousness and greatness of my opponent. I am, and have been for the past two days extremely ill; stuffed on anti-biotics and injections I now write this. I took a whole lot of anaesthetics and strong pain killers a while ago so if I start muttering about lights and cats in the sky, think not too much of it: I am in my happy place. I will continue with my system, because that is how I do so in oral debates, and it makes it clearer I believe. So allow me to start with the rebuttals: 1. I stated I have not given a religious argument and indeed I have not what I gave was a theological one. There is a big difference a religious argument is where I support a claim from Scripture or related sources, it is often given between people of similar faiths for certain issues. A theological argument simply assumes God (as spoken off in Theodice by Leibniz) and from this conviction moves on in a logical manner. My argument stands for those who believe in God: that an infinitely good and/or just God would not endow man/woman with lust, which causes sin, more often than nought, unless it was for reproduction, primarily, That the rational grounding is in reproduction, there can be no doubt. Therefore the only time sex would be rational would be (if one believes in God) for reproduction. 2.Your analysis of argumentation is not necessarily sound. While yes, my conclusion will not directly follow and of course my argument will fail that does not necessarily disprove my conclusion. It is known as argument from fallacy. That is where your counter argument kicks in. 3. My opponent has for the most part taken things out of context. By going from the conclusion to the premises it seems as if what I say is truly medicated speech (it actually is). In any case let me give my arguments in the correct premise-conclusion format and then show how my opponent is the one who has lost this debate. [1] Sex is moral if and only if it is rational[1.1] all S is R [2] Sex is rational if and only if done for reproduction[1.2] all R is Q [3] Ergo sex is moral only when done for reproduction ergo all S is Q [1.1] Please understand that rational is used in the philosophical meaning of the word which means reasonable as in justifiable, or within the boundaries of law and goodness. After all the opponent is arguing that sex is rational when done for pleasure. [1.2] There is no doubt to the validity of my argument, only its soundness, which rests on the second premise. For the second premise I gave further arguments which I will outline. These premise should not be needed, they have already been given in argument form but I feel it neccessary now after seeing how my opponent is not clear to the arguments. [1.2(a)] God, infinitely just, is always good, [1.2(b)] Lust is good when done reproduction (as for why God does not like lust from a completely logical view refer to Theodice by Leibniz and Three Essays by Hegel) [1.2(c)] Ergo lust is rational only when done for reproduction. (assuming the premise that rational is good, which is by definition of rational shown) The other argument for the second premise was: [1.2.1(a)] Evolution makes redundant any instinct not neccessary for survival (see On the Origins of Species by Charles Darwin) [1.2.1(b)] Lust is still present [1.2.1(c)] Ergo lust is neccessary for survival[1.2.2] [1.2.2(a)] Lust is only neccessary for survival when used for reproduction [1,2,2(b)] The rational of lust is found in why it is neccessary for survival [1.2.2(c)] The rational of lust is in reproduction. There, this I believe is a much more coherent system than the one provided by opponent, it is usually not given but I have done so for clarity. Now for the rebuttals I must say I may not be able to do them, for the I just woke up from my medicated sleep and had only around twenty (20) minutes. I not only have five (5). However the fact that my opponent is going from around should be enough. I will post the rebuttals next round, I ask for some forgiveness due to my ill health. I will if my opponent allows post the rebuttals in the comments. S/he may choose to accept them or ignore them, that is her/his right. Thank you, Ajab