Free Market Capitalism (Pro) vs Mixed Economy(Con)

My premise lies on the principles of morality and efficiency. It is worth noting that throughout history, governments that attempt to impose/control the market tend to fare worse than more capitalist countries. We see a clear correlation between a country"s HDI and a country"s economic freedom. [. http://www.heritage.org..., . http://www.nationsonline.org...] I will argue on the premise of morality using the concept of individualism. Through the viewpoints of individualism, this means that people should be regarded not as faceless masses but individuals. In free market capitalism, individuals that produce more for the society (businesses create products and jobs) are rewarded with more money. Individuals that are willing to take a higher risk gets a higher reward. This encourages rapid business growth and creates a sense of emulation among businesses. This results in a decrease in price and an increase in quality for consumers. However, this does inevitably leads to wealth inequality but, then so what? Wealth inequality is not an inherent problem. For example, let's imagine a scenario where you and I are standing together in a room. I have 1 dollar in my pocket while, you have 6 dollars in yours. Just because you have more money than me, does not mean that you have stolen money from me. Perhaps it is because you have a job and I don"t. Maybe, you were supposed to have 7 dollars and I actually stole 1 dollar from you! The point is that the homeless aren"t poor because of Bill Gates. Another advantage of "free market capitalism is that it is impossible to discriminate against certain ethnic groups, religions, etc. Businesses only care about 1 color and that is green. Profit is what businesses care about and this results in little room for intolerance. In order to maximize profit, people with the highest productivity and merit get the job. If a business owner rejects a high skilled laborer on the basis of skin color then, he loses a valuable resource which leads to him losing against his competitors. Likewise, if the business refuses to sell a product/service to a customer on the basis on skin color then, they would lose a potential customer leading to a decrease in profit which results in them losing to their competitors. This is why Jim Crow laws were forced to be implemented and wasn"t just a "cultural thing". Southern businesses despite being racists would still serve African American customers. We have also seen a trend in Europe in which more laissez faire economic policies are taking place. There is a gradual shift to "right-wing" economics in recent years in most of Western Europe. Notable examples include the UK, Germany and France. [. http://econintersect.com...] The two main reasons why Europe is voting more right wing leaders (particularly in economics and immigration) is very simple. The refugee crisis and the economic downturn due to leftist economic policies. It is worth noting that the government with increased intervention in the economy tend to fare much worse. Bolivia and Venezuela are both examples of this failure compared to more capitalist Chile. A nation"s prosperity depends less on resource production but resource allocation. The free market always allocates resources in the most efficient way and controlled/mixed economies simply can"t keep up.