Sex Could Not Possibly Have "Evolved:"

I'm only going to look at a few things before I end this, and I will not reply again afterwards."Actually, the chicken egg did not evolve -- it was designed simultaneously with the chicken."I didn't say anything about chickeneggs, I simply said eggs."No they weren't. Which species other than chicken are you claiming ever laid a chicken egg? You need to identify the name of the species. SPOILER: You can't do so because you are simply lying."1. I never said another species aside from chickens laid chicken eggs, I said that species that are ancestral to chickens also laid their own eggs.2. Lying means to tell something false, with the knowledge that it was false, purposely. If you think I am lying, you actually need to prove that I know what I'm saying is false."My opponent failed to counter the above-stated fact in any way: It remains valid, true, and 100% unchallenged."Well, that definitely is a lie because that requires that your statement be any of those three things (and, at the very least, if my rebuttal was wrong then the 100% unchallenged part is still a lie)."See attached video in my OP."Not a citation."Not true -- some plants reproduce sexually."The only proper rebuttal you had, and it was still wrong; I did say that plants could reproduce sexually as well, please re-read my rebuttal - "The vast majority of all animals reproduce sexually, everything else (including some animals and plants, which can use both forms of reproduction) reproduces asexually.""I never claimed it was, so that is a straw man logical fallacy on your part."I should have worded that better but those paragraphs I wrote explaining the different forms of sexual reproduction were meant just as much for the general audience watching this debate as it was for you. So the "you" in that sentence is supposed to an impersonal or generic you, instead of specifically referring to yourself. I usually assume that either my opponent or the audience or both don't understand the topic at hand, so I wrote that part of rebuttal to explain things for them."No it doesn't."Provide an actual rebuttal, not just sticking your fingers."Exactly who or what did the asexually reproducing creature organism supposedly "select" in order to supposedly give rise to at least two sexually-reproducing creatures, one male and one female, in your view?"I'll link you this peer reviewed article from the National Center of Biotechnology Information, originally published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov..."That is a subjective opinion, not an objective fact."You don't say."No it isn't."Going to actually prove your assertions sometime soon?"That is ludicrous -- sexual reproduction CANNOT take place without sexual organs."I provided you an exact example of a type of organism that can. Again, you're just plugging your ears, closing your eyes, and yelling 'La la la la, I can't hear you!' You aren't having a debate, you're just sitting in an echo chamber that is completely closed out from any dissenting opinion. Either that, or you're just a troll. I can't tell to be quite honest but I guess that's just Poe's law at work. So, please, don't reply to this because you'll just be yelling by yourself.