the Belgian UFO Wave is best Explained as Aliens

Con says that if my points are fact "the only conclusion that could be made is that something happened which defies conventional explanations of known natural phenomena" has happened. Well, if it defies our understanding of natural phenomena, then we must look to something outside of earthly, natural explanation. Now he asks me why I don't think it was a miracle. Well, this ufo phenomenon has been going on for a while; and witnesses, reliable witnesses, ok, describe what is obviously a space ship. In fact, some have even seen it up close enough to touch it and examine it. I wonder if Con will also tell me that "radar malfunction" was the case in all the other cases too? How can that be when in other cases they actaully "saw" what they were looking at, and some touched it? It even left radiation readings in this case. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... One critic even tried to tell one millitary pilot that what he saw was the planet Jupiter. If so, why did the US government confescate all the evidence and swear them to secrecy? Since when was Jupiter classified? http://www.youtube.com... The Biblical doctrine of God is not one who flies around in space ships. Nor do demons fit that description either. Nor can a spirit being such as an angel be tracked on radar. So this obviously isn't a miracle, its something else. If the Belgian UFO Air Wave stood alone as the only example of its kind, "maybe" we could say "I just don't know." But this is just one of many many others which confirm the existence of aliens, and this is one more reason the Belgian UFO Air Wave is best explained as aliens. As I said, there are many more examples where these things were clearly "seen" and detected on camera as well as radar. They even intervened to shut down a missles lauch in one case. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... So I really hope Con won't try to pass this off as a unique example as some unexplanable phenomenon. One would also have to wonder what would be the purpose of this "miracle" if indeed it were from God. Was anyone converted to Christianity becasue of it? "my opponent is apparently a sceptic of the science of evolutionary theory, although it is the vast majority consensus of biologists" Majorities don't decide truth, nor is truth decided by science alone. There are many truth science itself can't get at. Do you love anyone? Family, wife, or kids maybe? Science can't agree that "love" really exists. Science says that such feelings are nothing more than harmones and an aid to reproduction. Do you really accept that? What is it then that couple feel for each other when they want no kids? Love even moves some to sacrifice their lives. No scientific instrument can detect that "love" and tell you what its made of. Science can't say that "right" and "wrong" exit. Science can't say that rape is immoral for us any than it can say that when a male shark forcibly copulates with the female that he "rapes" her and is wrong. On the scientific atheistic worldview, were a superior race of aliens to come and view us as food the same way we view cows as "beef" they would be no more "wrong" than the lion who eats a zebra. They are merely following evolution, and trying to survive. Science can't get at morality. Yet, you and I and the scientists themselves know deep down that morality is real; that some things really are good and others really are evil. So I don't have to agree with all that scientists say. Evolution is a theory that has so many problems in it, and the problems make evolution itself so improbable, that the mathematical odds are so small I can't accept them. God knows how they can, but I can't. The odds of getting a living thing from a non-living thing by natural means are the same as a man rising naturally from the dead. The alien hypothesis doesn't have those problems. In fact, the evidence we have for aliens is exactly what we would expect; the evidence we have for evolution isn't. Example, the pre-cambrian strata preserves microbial life very well, it should therefore have preserved many of the intermediates leading to the vertebra of the cambrian explosion, yet it doesn't preserve any. "why is something unexplainable automatically aliens?" What else but an intelligence can do flight maneauvers better than our planes, travel faster than anyplane we have on earth, detect when we have them locked on to fire and dart away at tremendous speeds, and fly in patterns of a triangle? Pro asks me to give another source other than wikipedia. If my souce isn't reliable, tell me why. Othewise, my source stands as reliable in this debate. Anyways, I will give an additional source. Funny how Con says that it was atpospheric conditions that affected the radar, and in this link I have the Chief of the Belgian Air Staff admitting that he could rule that out because they got a visual confirmation from a witness that verified what was on the radar. He says it would be good to get another visiual confirmation which they did get from the police on the ground in March 30-31, matching what was on radar. (Remember the Belgian UFO Air Wave occured over a period and not in one night alone) The US millitary denied having any secret spy plane in the area, and as I said before, such speeds would be intolerable for a human. It also moved faster than supersonic planes without making noise; this is impossible for all our surrent technology including the choppers Con suggested. My other source he called for is here: http://www.youtube.com... He said "I think a few additional, original sources would perhaps give some his claims more weight." Well, I've done so, and in the link, the cheif of Belgian's air staff explains that the witnesses said they saw a "metallic" object. They were describing a ship. This is what "he" says the reports were that came in from the witnesses. The only reason F-16s were scrambled in the first place was because the sighting was confirmed by radar and by police on the ground. While not admitting it was aliens, the official airforce report ruled out all other possibilities. http://wzus1.search-results.com... Con talks about my use of "broad corroboration" and "matched exactly" in regard to the witnesses statements; but surely there were many contradictory statements about the sinking of the Titanic as well as the 9/11 disaster, doesn't mean the events didn't happen. Space ships were in the skies of Belgium as sure as the Titanic sank and the Twin Towers fell. All this talk about hysteria usually comes up when people challenge the norm of the day. Its not easy to go against the grain, but I commend all the witnesses for their brave stand up and the airforce for getting involved. I'll ask Con to be honest; do you really think that if the government got their hands on one of the aliens and the ship, that they'd tell the world about it, or hide the technology for themselves? There are aliens visiting our planet and the Belgian UFO Air Wave is one perfect example. I look forward to Con's response.