Religion is incorrect

Hhhmm, okay. So all I have to prove is that the belief in a higher power or deity is correct. And I am in no way offended, I respect everyone's beliefs. This won't be too hard. It's actually funny though. I started that argument where I claimed to be smarter than any atheist a long time ago, and I lost. I did not have enough experience to make such claims. But I am a man now, and there's wood to be chopped. I will begin with the best argument (in my opinion) of all time for the existence in a higher power. The Ontological Argument 1. Our understanding of God is a being than which no greater can be conceived. 2. The idea of God exists in the mind. 3. A being which exists both in the mind and in reality is greater than a being that exists only in the mind. 4. If God only exists in the mind, then we can conceive of a greater being—that which exists in reality. 5. We cannot be imagining something that is greater than God. 6. Therefore, God exists. Explaination: Basically what this means is that because God is a being than which no greater being can be conceived, he has to exist in the greatest possible world in order for the title of "greatest being that can be conceived" to still fit. It is impossible to argue that God can't exist in the mind; he can and does. We must assume that our reality is the greatest possible world, therefore, God must exist in the greatest possible world. So, if it is even possible for a miximal great being to exist, he must exist. This one really is thinking outside of the box. You have to think about it for awhile. Kalam Cosmological Argument. Whatever begins to exist, has a cause of its existence. The universe began to exist. Therefore, the universe has a cause of its existence. Explanation: Cause does not mean purpose. Cause, in this sense, means the relationship from one event to the next. It is impossible for there to be an infinite amount of causes for the universe. Nothing 'real' in our universe can be infinite. When I say 'real,' I mean tangible. Certainly ideas can be infinite such as Pi, which is supposedly infinite. Knowing this, there had to have been an initial cause or push; something outside of our realm of physics had to initiate the first cause. This cause must be a higher power or deity. Objective Moral Argument A human experience of morality is observed. God is seen to be the best or only explanation for this moral experience. Therefore, God exists Morality, no doubt exists in the human world. Throughout history, acts such as murder, theft, rape, ect. have always been seen as evil. The only explanation for this is God. Argument From Contingency Since the Universe could, under different circumstances, conceivably not exist (contingency), its existence must have a cause – not merely another contingent thing, but something that exists by necessity (something that must exist in order for anything else to exist). In other words, even if the Universe has always existed, it still owes its existence to an uncaused cause. This cause must be some kind of higher power or deity. Fine Tuning Argument There are over 50 physical cosmological constants (basically equations that had to equal a certain value) for our universe to form properly and support life. To stress the importance of how perfect these constants had to be in order for life to form, think about this analogy: Cover the entire North American continent in dimes all the way up to the moon, a height of about 239,000 miles (In comparison, the money to pay for the U.S. federal government debt would cover one square mile less than two feet deep with dimes.). Next, pile dimes from here to the moon on a billion other continents the same size as North America. Paint one dime red and mix it into the billions of piles of dimes. Blindfold a friend and ask him to pick out one dime. The odds that he will pick the red dime are one in 10^37.Your friend would have had to pick that red dime 50 times in order for the universe to form properly, and for life to exist. That's how perfect these constants had to be. If even one of these were to not equal what they equal, life would no exist and I wouldn't even be here to make this argument. This argument does not prove the existence of a deity like the others, but it does support the idea of one. It supports that the universe was finely tuned. Pascal's Wager "God is, or He is not" A Game is being played... where heads or tails will turn up. According to reason, you can defend either of the propositions. You must wager. (It's not optional.) Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is. (...) There is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. And so our proposition is of infinite force, when there is the finite to stake in a game where there are equal risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite to gain. Some people don't like this argument because they say it appeals to emotion. If anything, in my opinion, it most definitely appeals to logic. Logically, believing in God has to be the best choice. Those are all of the arguments I have. I will be very, very surprised if you can debunk all of these. Good Luck! :)