Slum tourism is helping the poor

Hello again, I will refute my opponents points this round. In round 3 I will not rebut, I will only crystallize my arguments. I ask that my opponent does this same (though you do not have to if you feel it is absolutely necessary to refute. Just know I will not be following suit). 1) In this point my opponent makes the argument that the tour organization will give some of its profits to charity (bringing up Reality Tours and Travel) or the tourists will donate food, water, and other goods. As I said previously, the profits these tour companies make are very low. So we have two problems here: a). The profits going back into the community are very small. My opponent argues that even a little can make a difference. However, let's think about this logically for a moment. If a company makes very little profits this means the community does not get much money from the tours. If they do not get much money, then very little people are benefited. This also means the very few benefited are also benefited very insignificantly. b). This ties in with point a: my opponent mentions how the tourists can donate food, water, and other goods. Going back to what I said before, this money, these goods are not solving poverty long-term. Have you ever heard the Chinese saying "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."? This is incredibly accurate, instead of just giving finite supplies, we need to be helping the poor in more sustainable ways. So yes, you are exaggerating the benefits of slum tourism. 2) My opponent is correct in that charities do not get up and leave after one day but this does not mean they stay in one area forever. They also said a charity might teach English, sports, livelihood skills, and soft skills, Concern Worldwide being an organization that does this. I looked into them being honest, they seem okay. HOWEVER, just because charities like Concern Worldwide exist does not mean slum tours donate to them. And even if they do, slum tours still don't make much money to give to such charities. Concern Worldwide operates regardless of slum tours. Concern is the one helping the poor, not slum tours (and their contributions to charities like Concern are likely very little). 3) Perhaps the quotes were a bit...dramatic for lack of better word. However, you argument is essentially that because Reality Tours and Travel is so amazing, other slum tours must be as well. This is generalizing and probably untrue as well. The quotes you provided were some people who were "satisfied" out of the many different tours available, just because some locals don't mind or were happy does not mean all of them were. And EVEN if people don't mind the the tourists and pictures are not allowed anywhere (though you yourself said only some tours have this rule) AND if contact with locals is not minimal AND there is no harassment---that doesn't mean slum tourism helps the poor! As I said before, very little money is going back to the community, and whatever does is minimal, and charities generally do not solve for poverty in the long-term. Onto my opponents arguments: 1) Poverty This argument was essentially that poverty is widespread and awful. I totally agree with this, everyone does, but as I keep saying, slum tours barely do anything to help solve this in the long-term. 2) Slum tours It is true that slum tours expand your worldview but that only benefits you. Yes, you might donate and the other things you mentioned might happen, but just read what I have previously said as a response to this argument.