People should be allowed to commit suicide

My opponent states, "that a newspaper article did find that emotional pain did hurt more than physical pain. " I do not wish to state weather believe or deny this statement however would liked to note the lack of source. If my opponent is correct and believes this, which I believe based on his argument he does. Then he would have to agree that suicide is completely wrong. This is because suicide (based on the sources I presented) does inflict large amounts of emotional and mental pain to various individuals. So by that logic and my opponent's strong belief that suicide is a just act then it is safe to conclude that he would agree it would be just for someone to substitute emotional abuse to be physically abused for years. Suicide causes individuals such a great emotional pain for an LONG time and is VERY DIFFICULT to recover despite my opponent's belief. My opponent will probably contradict as he has been prone to do and say it is not the same one is person is directly hurting someone the other is indirectly. Yet it still hurts and still causes pain. Indirect actions can be just as harmful as direct actions. Example if the owner of a power plant decides I am going to burn it down when no one is here for the insurance money because he needs it, but he is ignorant of the life support systems utilizing that power at the local hospital across the street. He is not directly harming anyone it is his building and he has the right to do whatever he wants. Yet it still seems irresponsible and just wrong for him to satisfy his own needs at the expense of others. If the pilot had such perfect and strong morals he would be responsible and would have considered the consequences of his actions beforehand. If he was such a moral person he would realize the importance of life and not tarnish it by causally throwing it away. He would not just give up and quite life he would more likely try to compensate by performing good deeds to redeem and to himself. That would be more noble and better than just throwing it all away. If he feels responsible he should try to fix what he has done the best he could. Even though he can never bring people back to life he could try to help the community by repairing it and helping the families. Suicide would be away to escape the pain of responsibility. Escaping responsibility is wrong an immoral. My opponent said "others committing suicide because one person committed suicide, firstly Id say maybe this isn't such a bad thing. Maybe there were people suffering every day" or maybe they were following a trend. Let's think about those in cults who drink rat poison because they believe it will enlighten them is that good. What if a guy flying a plane decided oh man it think I am just going to kill myself right now it is in my right. If someone is on acid an thinks they can fly do they have the right to start jumping of buildings. No all these things are wrong and allowing suicide to be legal could make people not realize the severity of their actions. My opponent is an example of a population blissfully ignorant of the consequences of their actions. People don't always due what is best for them. Do you think someone who is addicted to meth is doing what is best for them? Do you think it is far for a child to come home every day and see their parent on the couch high on meth. No it is wrong "but it is there body" but they are indirectly hurting others with their irresponsible actions "man responsibility sucks" yeah it does sometimes but if everyone was completely responsible then things would run a lot smoother. It is moral to be responsible and immoral to be irresponsible. I am not even going to address any of the other issues I feel as though my opponent has severely disappointed me by only proposing one selfish benefit. He casually ignores all the negative aspects that I have presented. He has yet to present any evidence to support wild assumptions that he uses to counter the arguments he has acknowledged.