Troll Debate Week 3: Satan and Morals

C1. My opponent in this contention go's on to say lots about how Satan was there but he wasn't the cause of Morality. He said "satan just showed us what God had already determined it to be." So, by this he is saying it was already predetermined by God. So, my opponent is really saying that God planned that all out, he made the devil do the act because he already determined it to happen, and he just needed someone to get the blame besides him. God is fair, and he would not send someone to f*ck up mankind for all of eternity. If it was not for Satan, the fruit of the tree of good and evil (The cause of morality and mortality) would not have been eaten. Therefore, my friends, it is becuase of him that this happened. 1)First, Antisocialpinko starts talking about how I stated good can't exist without evil, and then says how it's supposed to hurt my argument because I didn't say that evil can't exist without good. That was rather implied a lot in my argument. Like with my Atom analogy, I said how without an electron, their is no proton, and everyone would be neutrons. But, also, without protons, there cannot be electrons. (I thought this all was already implied and not needed so say, but I guess spinko need help). Then, he says that the main way to win this contention is to prove who created morality: God or satan. I say satan, Spinko says God. This is Spinkos argument for God: God as the ultimate originator of all that exists and ever will exist is the ultimate definer of morality. It is true that God created everything physically, but he did not create the things that humans created themselves or by intervention from unknown origin. God did not create cell phones, humans did. God did not create cars, or sliced bread, or duct tape, no, it was humans. But for moral, moral wasn't there at first. In the garden of eden, Adam and Eve did not know morals before eating the fruit. Their hearts were completely pure, no sin at all. Then, they ate the fruit, deliberately going AGAINST GOD. As in not obeying God. As in it wasn't God who made them eat the fruit. Now, wait a second. Who was it that convinced them to eat the fruit? Oh yeah, Satan. I remember now. My point is made.C3) You basterd, Spinko. I am here, trollin' it up, and then you come over and do this.:)-I-< (<----Spinko) ll lllll ll ===--# (<--- Dynamite) :'(-I-< (<-----Me) You just destroyed me with emotional dynamite. I am hurt. HOW DARE YOU. >:(c4) Aha. My opponent sacrafices this point and probably the entire debate. Thank you, Spinko. Now, first of all he concedes this point. The point is now mine. Yay. Ok, and then my opponent concedes maybe this entire debate by saying " P.s. burn in hell Wright brothers.". Thank you for that, first off, Spinko. Now, you prove that the airplains are the unholiest weapon in the known universe. Now, by stating this, i ask: Why did you say this? Why do they deserve to go to hell? Is it because they created the ultimate tool of hell? If you guessed yes, you would be CORRECT. Thank you for conceding, Spinko. You kindly made the inevitable easier on me. :DI thank all of the voters and readers for reading this stupid debate, and Antispinko for his arguments. I encourage the voters not to vote because of my forfeit. It would be more fair, and I apoligize for doing so in the first place. Thank you for the compelling arguments, Spinko. I look forward to debating you again! Now, let this be the day that you ALMOST caught, captain....Jack.....Sparrow.....