No one deserves to go to Hell

God IS morality My opponent's conclusion that God deserves hell presupposes two things: 1. God has free will. 2. God has done something immoral. I find the first presumption rather indisputable. God certainly has pure free will. However, it is the second that should warrant close examination. God: “the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe. ” (1). By his VERY definition, by such a status, morality and God are intertwined. Morality is the method in which we ought to conduct ourselves in the Universe. So, what method could be superior to the one exercised by he who created it? I contend that God IS morality. If God exists as the being which decides who does and does not go to heaven, then morality is the board of laws through which one would be accepted in heaven. If a God exists and a heaven exists and a hell exists, then we will act in a way that would send us to one of those places. That method of behavior is referred to as morality…and the degree of morality is measured by how much it agrees with the operations of heaven and the actions of God. In short, God's actions are the definition of that which is moral, so therefore he cannot EVER be immoral. Thus, either God does not do these immoral things we think he does, or our perceptions of morality are wrong. If Our perceptions of morality are incorrectSo, let’s say that God sends people to hell unfairly. This would mean that all forms of unfairness are moral. Murder is unfair, that would be moral. Theft is unfair, that would be moral. Enslavement is unfair, that would be moral. So, if God does unfair things, then all things that humans do that are unfair are moral. So, this would mean that neither God nor criminals deserve hell. If Our perceptions of morality are correct So, let’s say our perceptions of morality are indeed correct. This would then mean that God does not do what we think he does. My opponent would then have to prove that God does things contrary to what the average human would perceive as fair or just. If he cannot prove that God actually does unfair things, or sends people to hell at all to begin with, then neither God nor criminals deserve hell. I must admit, it is rather easy to prove God’s unfairness. However you should remember that this is only 1 of 2 options. If God’s actions do not agree with our sense of morality, then by default, our sense of morality is incorrect. The only logical conclusion that follows is that no one, not even God deserves hell. God is morality, so he cannot be immoral. If God does things we think our immoral, then we are wrong, and those actions are indeed moral. Otherwise, God does not do them. ConclusionI, firstly, must thank my opponent for constructing one of the most creative and interesting debates I have participated in. However, I have shown that no human being can deserve to be sent to hell. I then proceeded to show that even God cannot deserve to go to hell. If you accept the option that human perception of morality is incorrect, then my Round 2 argument concerning how hell is unfair, would be invalid,…I understand. HOWEVER, I provided new rationale for why nobody could still possibly deserve hell. I said that, if God is indeed unfair, that means humans are incorrect, and unfairness/injustice is still moral. That means all criminal actions under the sun that are unjust or unfair or cruel, would be permissible, since God leads by example. Then again, if you accept the option that God does not do immoral things to start with, he does not send people to hell, ever,…then my Round 2 argument would stand, and no criminal would deserve hell, and neither would God, since he does nothing immoral. Through both options we find hell unjustified for ALL. Therefore, please vote PRO. Thank you. Source 1. . http://dictionary.reference.com...