The Puerto Rican Day parade "Seinfeld" episode was banned for being "anti-white"

First of all, my opponent couldn't even come up with an argument which is why he didn't post. And he also claims my posts are pathetic (not that it bothers me, because he's too confused about this subject to even know what to say)But I'll continueI won't waste too much time with this. My opponent has simply made such a weak and pathetic case, that it has no ground to stand on and is completely irrelevant to the topic. I'll take my time to spell it out more, but honestly I should be able to forfeit every round and win this. Sense of entitlement, much? Forfeiting automatically makes you lose. The PuertoRican day parade episode was pulled because some people viewed it as disrespectful or hateful to Puerto Ricans. In the episode Kramer starts stomping on a Puerto Rican flag that was burning, and at one point there was some rioting at some point and Kramer exclaims that "It's like this everyday, in Puerto Rico". . http://www.nytimes.com......It could be seen as hateful, but then again, Puerto Ricans are not necessarily a minority either. . https://en.wikipedia.org...https://www.houseofnames.com...The man who led the movement was of Anglo descent by the way. You didn't refute. Race is mainly a social construct, so anybody identifying with Puerto Rican and viewed as Puerto Rican, is Puerto Rican for all intents and purposes. It makes no difference where you trace their origins to, and I won't even dignify my opponent's argument by even investigating it. I could use the same ridiculous arguments to argue that all men and women are African, as that is where the human race came from. It's irrelevant and beside the point, and it fails to identify race as a social construct. Except Puerto Rican is not a race, but a country. And given that the Visigothic countries did conquer Spain at one point -- there's a hell of a lot of Visigothics. A lot of Hispanics particualry those descendend from the Visigiothics, were actually not discriminated against the way the Italians, Irish or Germans were. Many were actually Protestant or Jewish (and Pentecostalism is big in Latin America; Pentecostalism is an offshoot of Methodism). . https://books.google.com...Cubans were considered white according to this. Many portrayed in the episode actually looked whiter than Kramer himself. Let's just assume that you do find that Puerto Ricans are white, it's still a ridiculous argument to make. It's like if my opponent. Said all Nazis were ignorant and then I called it an anti white statement. It wouldn't be an anti white statement, it is merely and anti nazi statement, the fact that all or most Nazis are whit is irrelevant and beside the point, the criticism of a subset of a race, isn't criticism of the race. Except, contrary to what con might be trying to implying, Nazism wasn't about Nordic supremacy. Here's a statement made by Hitler. . http://www.debate.org...;(I didn't wanna post it here because it would take too much space)Taken from: . http://www.amazon.com...Again, Puerto Ricans are not a race. Also unlike Chinese or Native Americans or Indians, Puerto Ricans in large are white. There was an episode where one of the characters says "Chinaman" but it's more an outdated term than one of racial offense, the way "chink" is. Voters, award me the win, because my opponent has made irrelevant arguments. I'd also remind the voters that they are allowed to refrain from awarding conduct points if they find my opponent's arguments offensive. I don't need to be docked for the missed roundEntitlement such? You don't get points because you don't like my argument. I haven't said anything offensive. I have proved that the Puerto Rican Day episode was canned for being anti-white.