The Bible cannot be "God's Word" due to this:

You said " i asked for examples of God blantatntly killing o having killed innocent people. in every example you've shown and that i know of, there was some sort of sins involved, be it from the community or from parents etc." Do you understand that God had babies killed? You do recognize that when God had entire cities killed, he did not say "just kill the adults responsible for making me angry" but said to kill everyone, babies born yesterday included. You are trying to say that was because "sin was involved" from the community or from parents. Let's address that. 1. Communities cannot sin. Sin is an act of an individual. There is no such thing as a community sin. A community of people can all commit the same sin but that is a sin from each individual whether it was from one or 10,000 people. This idea of a nation or a community sin is just impossible. A nation cannot commit a murder. A community cannot tell a lie or break the Sabbath. Only individuals can. The Biblical writers never really gave that much thought. Saying that a nation can sin is like saying a chair can sin. 2. Now, you mentioned about the parents sinning. Fine, let's say that parents did sin. What does that have to do with the 5 day old children of those sinning parents? The Bible says: Deut. 24:16 - Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor children put to death for their fathers; each is to die for his own sin. I don't see how that could possibly be more crystal clear even if it does contradict other passages that say children were punished for the sins of their fathers as in the case of Bathsheba's child. Also, the fact that God killed innocent people because sin was involved is a contradiction. Why should the innocent be punished for some sin someone else committed? Imagine if our legal system worked that way. Your family member commits a murder and the judge sentences YOU to death because you are a blood relative or live in the same "community"! Make sense? Do you think God who calls himself righteous and holy is going to do that? Since the Bible clearly defines what a sin is (transgression of the law - 1 John 3:4), what law would you say that a 5 day old baby broke in order to be guilty of a sin? Did they tell a lie? Work on the Sabbath? Covet? Worship another God? Use the Lord's name in vain? Can you give me an example of a sin that a small newborn baby could possibly commit in order to deserve death and I assume that the child would have to go to hell since the child has to accepted Jesus as their savior? Again, you must name a real sin which is a transgression of one of the 600+ laws God gave to Israel. Which one of the laws can a newborn baby break? This could be a little off topic but when God destroyed the whole Earth with a flood because everyone but Noah's family was "wicked," have you ever asked yourself by what standard of wickedness was God referring to? The people in Noah's day had never been given laws to live by. How would you like to get a ticket on a road while driving when there was no posted speed limit only to find out that you were "speeding?" The whole reasoning behind God destroying the Earth with a flood makes no sense in light of this. There was no standard of right and wrong so how could they be "wicked?" In fact, how could Noah and his family be good? By what standard? Mankind was not given the rights and wrongs until Moses came along, according to the Bible. Have you ever thought about that gaping whole in the Bible? Aside from the fact that God destroyed innocent people, you have not addressed the fact that God lied by putting lies into the mouths of his own prophets. God says he cannot lie. Over to you.