One world government

Hi there, Many thanks to my opponent for your views and thorough argument...however.... You state "believe we need to set the framework for this "one world government". Are we presuming that each country willfully and uniformly abolished sovereignty or each country retains its individuality but accepts political direction from a single authority?" Well, here we have a problem...."willingly abolish"....."authority"...."direction" This is the problem, even creating a simple sentence already shows a defensive or negative approach assuming that there is going to be a totalitarian dictatorship or somehow people are going to lose something or have to do without something. You stated later in your argument (forgive me for not doing this in order) that people did ot have the technology that we have now and this is what led people to be tribal....I absolutely agree but!!! It really is time to move on, if we had the internet all those years ago then we would simply be aware much earlier that we share the same rock and are only seperated by the time it takes to get from one place to another. I know we are tribal, I know we hang on to our history like some sort of comfort blanket but really, we are capable of so much yet we really don't want to let go of the past...the past has proven just how stupid human beings are but at the same time it shows how we can overcome (in small numbers maybe) our outdated and frankly rediculous superstitions and practices to embrace progress and this is where we need to stop being little children and grow the hell up! So if someone does not want change to embrace something that works and would rather struggle because that is the way they were raised? Take a look at the North of Engand and the absolute pathetic way they hang on to their hard and turbulent past as if it was some sort of right of passage that they must adhere to otherwise they will lose their identity.....the problem with that is the whole country seems to want to ignore anthing that works in favour of its individuality....we dont need that same individuality because we are a global nation now....we have cell phones, the internet....knowledge....science...there is no need for this seperation...I stated this in my last argument...a community that works together works! expand that community to a whole area, a country, a continent...you get the idea. Less fortunate groups exist because there is greed, someone allways wins but remove the incentive....stay with me on this one...the incentive exists because we have allowed ourselves to seperate into groups therefor a group can be manipulated....if resources are managed correctly and people are given access to the very basics (equally) water, food and energy (and I am not quoting from Jaques Fresco...this is entirely possible and not some hippy pipedream) then the incentive changes....we create the incentive in our minds...change the goal and you change the outcome. Maybe the word "government" is the wrong one...it conjours up all sorts of issues in the mind so how about a Unified World Plan, a group of people elected by a global community based on a framework that wors for everyone, if you have a loophole that ca be exploited then that needs to be eliminated before you finish the framework...scientists, engineers and planners...that is what is required.. religion takes a back seat and stays out of politics...no excuses and no leeway, if it cannot be proven it stays out of policy...if it works keep it, if it doesnt work...find out why and fix it....or keep screwing up and we keep the world the way it is.