dogs should be classified as rodents

The outright idiocy of the internet never fails to amaze and astound me. You guys always have something new cooked up. I think I'm going to win. I might not. But I highly doubt it. Mice are covered in hair, and they are mammals. You could potentially argue, sir, that dogs deserve to be classified as rodents since both of them are mammals. THAT would be a good argument. That would be somewhat valid. It's about all they have in common. But no. You refuse to accept that rodents are mammals. They are mammals. They don't have fur on their tails, or their tail fur might be microscopic. But they are absolutely mammals. They have fur, and they give live birth, and they nurse their young. All three of those qualifications make them mammals. You only use wikihow, not wikipedia? What do you MEAN by that? They're for different things, and you can't call my source invalid just because it's on a website you don't like! Tomatoes are not poisonous, but medieval European nobility thought they were and refused to eat them, and only starving peasants ate them, and discovered that they were fine. There are no dangerous chemical reactions going on inside a tomato. Tomatoes are mostly water. They're delicious. Here's an article about them. I know you hate Wikipedia, but it'll have to do. https://en.wikipedia.org... Again, you are wrong about shrimp. Shrimp are crustaceans, fish are fish. This isn't hard to understand, not everything in the ocean is a fish. Anemones are not fish. Whales aren't fish. Whales are mammals. This is so, so easy. And you;re making it so, so hard. Still, very fun debate. Stephen Hawking might have come to your school, he makes public appearances pretty often, and talks about space and artificial intelligence with his little computer voice. I'll buy that. But don't tell me ARISTOTLE came to your school. He died over two thousand years ago. He could not have come to your school. That is an undeniable fact and to deny it would be incredibly foolish, considering you're about to lose. https://en.wikipedia.org... Your FAKE family tree is, indeed, WONG. It uses kindergarten level thinking. A scientist would never begin to look at it. It's truly bizarre and ridiculous. Two animals are not just related because they're big and fluffy, they have to share common relatives and DNA. Dogs and cats share very little in common. Two animals with the same name are not necessarily related. Lions are mammals. Sea lions are mammals, but they're sea mammals. Just because they have the same name does not mean they're related, they're barely related. Sea lions are more like porpoises or whales, they're not cats. For gosh sakes, how stupid can you be? https://en.wikipedia.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... Sea lions are ANIMALS. Algae are PLANTS. They're about as far away as you can get, and they both thrive in water, but many things thrive in water. Algae is a PLANT. Frogs are CRUSTACEANS. Toads are AMPHIBIANS, grasshoppers are INSECTS. HOW STUPIF CAN YOU BE TO NOT RECOGNIZE THIS WHERE DO YOU LIVE UNDER A ROCK GEEEZ. Grasshoppers are INSECTS. Mice are MAMMALS. Cats and mice do not have fun like in the #$#@@#$%%! Cartoons, CATS KILL MICE AND SWALLOW THEM YOU HAVE TO WAKE UP TO THE GRUESOME REALITIES OF LIFE Momma cats and kittens are different ages, but the same species. Momma cats were kittens at one point, too. Momma cats and puppies, again, are different species. I am treating it like it's only your opinion. It is an opinion, it is not true. It's not even an opinion, just a blatant lie. Show me an article about how they're PLANNING to reclassify dogs as rodents, or an article by a leading scientist about why they SHOULD. That's the only way you can win at this point. I'm waiting.