The character that I find best from naruto is better than anyone in one piece

I will begin by thanking my opponent for this debate. ----- I will now counter each of his responses individually. 1) Here, my opponent concedes that my statements on the subject are correct. However, he does not prove that three meters is enough to avoid Akainu's melting abilities, and does not provide a way for Minato to bypass Akainu's Logia abilities to injure him. Since it is the duty of the instigator to prove his claims, and my opponent has failed to do so, this point does not stand. 2) Minato is called the Yellow Flash due to the side effect of his Hiraishin no Jutsu, a bright yellow flash of light. Teleportation does not lead to an increase in momentum. Thus, this point is still invalid. 3) Akainu could also at least temporarily stun them with his Haki [3], which has been shown to be strong enough to actually deflect attacks and form a powerful shield in combination with other Haki. After stunning the toads, Akainu could hit them with Dai Funka, Ryuusei Kazan, or Meigou. Furthermore, the toads lack the method to actually harm Akainu, as they do not have access to Haki or Kairoseki [3], and their water can easily be evaporated by Akainu's Logia powers [4]. 4) My opponent has failed to prove A) that Minato would be able to seal Akainu's chakra without being severely injured, and B) that sealing Akainu's chakra would have any effect on his combat abilities, which are devil fruit-based. Thus, this claim is invalid. 5) It doesn't matter if Akainu's as fast as Minato. Minato is unable to hurt him, as he doesn't have access to Haki, Kairoseki, or Akainu's elemental weakness. Furthermore, Minato's speed will not allow him to avoid Akainu's attacks indefinitely, and he will eventually tire. When this occurs, Akainu will kill him. 6) As I have stressed repeatedly, Minato's speed is irrelevant, as he lacks the means to harm Akainu. Also, Akainu has the capabilities to force Minato to use his great speed and Hiraishin potentially dozens of times, which would undoubtedly eventually lead to exhaustion. ----- Now to refute my opponent's attempted defenses of his points. 1) Here, my opponent actually concedes his own argument and admits it to be virtually baseless conjecture. As he has done my work for me, I do not need to say anything other than this argument no longer stands. 2) Akainu could easily just cause the water to evaporate through use of his Devil Fruit powers. [4] ----- My opponent's statement about Minato's lack of screen time (so to speak) in the manga adds nothing to the debate and only further displays the fact that much of his case is conjecture. Akainu would literally take no more than a couple of moments to dispose of a toad depolyed through this method. Also, by attempting to touch Akainu, Minato will likely lose his hand to the Devil Fruit powers, as I have shown that he does not have an effective method to close the distance to Akainu and catch him by surprise. Akainu could simply turn to magma, let the frog fall onto him, and use Dai Funka from within. He has been shown to be immune to all damage besides Haki, Kairoseki, and his own elemental weakness; thus, this technique would do nothing but injure Minato's summoned beast. This strategy would be completely ineffective. By doing this, Minato would only aid Akainu in killing two birds with one stone by moving to the toad, which Akainu would already be targeting. By using Ryuusei Kazan, Akainu could dispose of all the toads with one technique. This renders the toads irrelevant, and makes it likely that Minato will be hit. Thus, the toads are useless. As to Gamabunta, I have shown that nothing he is capable of bringing to bear can injure Akainu, as he lacks sufficient elemental power and access to Haki and Kairoseki. Gamabunta would not be very difficult for Akainu to dispose of through Dai Funka, Ryuusei Kazan, or Meigou. Shima and Fukasaku lack the speed to evade Akainu's attacks and implement their techniques. One Dai Funka alone is likely too large and quick for them to avoid, let alone a rain of them a la Ryuusei Kazan. ----- I will now present one further argument before summarizing and weighing the debate for viewers. ARG3: Akainu would not be defeated by Minato due to Minato's inability to actually injure him. As I have mentioned (and cited) several times throughout the debate, Akainu can only be injured by Haki, Kairoseki, or his elemental weakness. Due to this invulnerability to Minato's attacks, Akainu would essentially be able to attack completely aggressively with total impunity. Though Minato is theoretically capable of dodging Akainu's attacks, doing so for a protracted amount of time will tire him due to the scale and ferocity of the moves. To summarize, Minato is essentially doomed, as he cannot hurt Akainu and can only run for so long. I will now summarize my arguments for viewers: 1) Minato is unable to successfully fight aggresively due to the nature of Akainu's Logia powers. 2) Minato lacks the offensive and defensive abilities to counter Akainu's attacks. 3) Akainu's total immunity to Minato's techniques allows him to attack aggresively with impunity, tiring and eventually vanquishing Minato. ----- I will now summarize the debate for viewers. CON has responded to PRO's points individually and successfully refuted all of PRO's statements. PRO has failed to refute CON's three arguments. None of PRO's arguments stand, while three of CON's stand. ----- I will now weigh the debate. SPELLING/GRAMMAR: Throughout the debate, PRO has displayed, to be honest, rather poor grammar and mediocre spelling. He has frequently made capitalization mistakes and misspelled various words, as well as misspelling the names of characters' techniques. CON has had relatively strong spelling and grammar throughout the debate. As a result, I urge viewers to vote CON for Spelling/Grammar. CONDUCT: While CON has thanked PRO for the debate at the opening and close of each statement, PRO has thanked CON for the debate rather infrequently. While PRO has not had bad conduct per se, CON's conduct has been overall better. As a result, I urge a CON vote for Conduct. CONVINCING ARGUMENTS: None of PRO's arguments stand, while three of CON's do. Akainu is totally immune to Minato's moves, while Minato is likely to suffer debilitating damage from even a glancing blow from Akainu. This essentially summarizes the entire debate for viewers, and I urge them to vote CON for convincing arguments as a result of this. SOURCES: PRO has almost exclusively cited Narutopedia for their arguments and has provided few, if any, links. CON, however, has provided six sources throughout the debate, all of which have corresponding links. As a result, I urge viewers to vote CON for sources. In summary, I urge viewers to cast all seven available points in favor of CON. ----- I will end by thanking PRO for the debate and the viewers for their time.