Resolved: Unwanted Pregnancy Abortions are unjust and should be banned in the US.

Ok, instead of going through every contention and reponse I will simply go through my opponents general attacks: 1) Fetus is not living, therefore doesn't have rights. 2) Genocide is racial, whereas abortion doesn't go against any specific race. 3) Social Contract doesn't apply to fetuses on the fact of objection #1. My responses to objections: 1) My opponent believes that a fetus isn't living. He doesn't agree to my point about implantation, so as my response I will do a science lesson. A) Argument of Embryology: I will name prominent scientific individuals and what they said about the beginning of life. Alfred M. Bongioanni, professor of pediatrics and obstetrics at the University of Pennsylvania; Dr. Jerome LeJeune, professor of genetics at the University of Descartes in Paris; Professor Hymie Gordon, Mayo Clinic; Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth, Harvard University Medical School; Dr. Watson A. Bowes, University of Colorado Medical School; Dr. Landrum Shettles, obstetrician-gynecologist at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center. Al of these scientist, were asked to meet with the Senate in 2007. The Conclusion of the meeting was this: "Life begins at implantation; when the egg cell attaches to the uterine-lining of the female." Only one pro-abortion scientist testified in front of the Senate, his conclusion: We don't know when life began. So either way, the leading scientists in the US unanimously believe that life begins at implantation. And even if you don't but this argument, the only pro-abortion stance is, we don't know. Ok, so isn't it better that we don't know and VALUE LIFE because it could be a living being. B) Argument of 8 characteristics of life: 1. Response - After implantation the embryo has the ability called nerve net. 2. Growth - Even before implantation, the embryo has the ability to grow. 3. Ability of Reproduction - The embryo has the ability in the future to reproduce. 4. Energy - The embryo uses up energy from metabolism. 5. One or more Cells - The embryo after implantation is made up of human cells. 6. Genetic Code - The embryo has the genetic make-up (Genetic code) of a human. 7. Evolution - The embryo has the ability to evolve. 8. Homeostasis - The embryo after implantation has a set homeostasis in it's body. -- You can drop my opponent's objection to the fetus isn't alive. (Unless he can provide evidence that life only occurs after birth.) 2) My opponent believes that genocide is only racial, and can't be applied to fetus. Extend: Extend that the fetus is living from my above objection, to this argument here. Ok, my opponent seems to not understand what genocide is. Definition: The Systematic extermination of a group due to race, ethnicity, national or any other specific factor. As you can see, genocide is not only racial, so drop my oppoent's point. Ladies and Gentleman, if you don't buy this, then here is an argument proving my opponent's RACE objection. Planned Parenthood: The largest abortion agency in the country. Founder was Margret Sanger. Do you know why she created Planned Parenthood? I'll give you a hint first: all planned parenthood's are in areas with the majority-minority. I.e. areas without white people. Get it? Well, as you should see from this, the purpose of planned parenthood was a Nazi idea to get rid of blacks and other minorities. Jesse Jackson, a civil rights activist, also a democrat, is against abortion for this reason. So, overall analysis: Abortion is genocide because it is the systematic extermination of a group, i.e. the unborn. Also, it is a racial genocide because the primary purpose of the biggest activist on abortion, i.e. planned parenthood is to kill off minority babies. 3) Social Contract doesn't apply to fetuses. Again extend my first response to this. My opponent's whole objection is that he says fetuses aren't alive because its a bunch of cells. It's because they are cells, cells is defined as any living being, that they are living. My opponent has a clear misunderstanding on science. Now specifically, the social contract. Fetuses are alive, meaning they have the right to life. It's an inalienable/natural right, given to all people. My opponent brings up the rights of animals and plants. HA, these things have more rights then unborn babies. E.g. It is unlawful to kill a walrus on the fact your violating it's RIGHT TO LIFE. Also, its unlawful to cut trees down because they are essential for living. EVEN VEGETATION HAS MORE RIGHTS THEN THE UNBORN. Ladies and Gentleman, I will now reiterate the premise of my case. 1) Murder is the violation of the right to life. Abortion is murder, since it violates the right to life. Therefore, abortion is murder. 2) Abortion is genocide on the fact it is the systematic extermination of a group. Taken from the UN charter: "Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, religious group, or any other group as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. Article III: The following acts shall be punishable: (a) Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d) Attempt to commit genocide; (e) Complicity in genocide. " 3) Abortion violates the right to life, therefore violating the social contract.