The Earth is currently going through a global warming phase.

1.) My opponent stated, "Since we are talking about average global temperatures, the average temperature error is what matters. Just like a high temp or a low temp of a single day or night is not important, neither is a single day of the Heat Island effect. We are talking about annual trends."The average temperature error is over 2°C, so this still points to the Heat Island effect corrupting data. 2.) My opponent claims that the over 2°C error "is a per station error and it is only an estimate. It is also the case that the error range is + or -, so if one errors +2 degrees and another errors -2 degrees, they balance out. "This is false, as the error is a (+) not a (-). That is like saying you can stick a thermometer to the tail pipe of your car, and get a accurate reading, because the error would cancel it's self out. The error is only a (+) thus it does not cancel it's self out. 3.)My opponent has made countless attacks on my graphs, even though I have already debunked these attacks he continues to use the same attacks on my graphs without recognizing that I have refuted these claims.4.) Greenland ice sheet sourceshttp://www.sott.net...http://www.europeantruth.co.uk... http://wattsupwiththat.com... Is that enough sources?Also the Arctic Ice Volume Has Increased 25% between May, 2008 and May, 2010 The blink comparator of U.S. Navy PIPS sea ice forecast data, shows a large increase in the area of ice more than two metres thick – turquoise, green, yellow and red. Much of the thin (blue and purple) ice has been replaced by thicker ice. http://wattsupwiththat.com...5.)The THC, although it mixes hot water with cold water, does not cancel it's self out. Yet again my opponent resorts to generalizations. Say the warm water is X and the cold water is Y. If X = +25 and Y = -15, than the result is +5. If the result is not cold enough it will melt the ice when it comes into contact with it.6.)My opponent claims my volcano chart is false because the numbers do not reflect volcanic activity, however the numbers on the side of the chart is not the number of Eruptions, but rather markers to help show the comparison. Here is another chart dealing with seismic activity http://greengoddesslove.wordpress.com...7.)My opponent obviously can't read graphs, as the sunspot graph does not predict future sunspots, the 2100 date is just there because the graph is going by 100 year increments.Let's recap; My pictures are accurate Surface readings (such as those provided my my opponent) are innacurate My opponent has ignored my refutations, and continued to repeat the same attacks on my sources and graphs. Satellite readings don't match surface readings The ice caps are increasingSolar activity has decreasedVolcanic activity has increased Glaciers are growing we are currently in a cooling period, and have been for around a decade or more Let me remind the voters that the resolution states "The BoP will be on [pro] to show the warming, while [con] needs to either show cooling, or refute all evidence of warming."My opponent has shown no evidence of recent warming, and the earth is either cooling or stasis, as I have already proven. The only evidence my opponent has provided to show recent warming, is surface temperature readings, which I have already proven to be unreliable.