All Female Genital mutilation should be banned

My opponent has dropped points 2, 3, and 4- and has only responded to point number 1 and an argument of mine as to how FGM should be abolished, which is off topic, and I only brought it up to rebuttal my opponent’s point that banning FGM would drive it underground. The actual punishments prescribed there were just overexadurated examples which I used to respond to a separate point. To put this simply my opponent responded to a tidbit which I said to make a point, but completely ignored the actual literal point that was relevant to the debate. If we do this, we will end up arguing the vastness of the universe in a debate about FGM since we can get really off topic by addressing non-literal examples instead of the overall point. THAT ALL CULTURES ARE EQUAL This is a common excuse for the horrors of certain (primarily Islamic) "civilizations," and truth be told, it isn't a very good one at that. Cultural Relativism is not only logical rubbish, it is a moral cesspool. The fact of the matter is FGM DOES make their culture inferior to ours because it’s barbaric, it’s that simple. Now let me explain to everyone why multiculturalism is complete nonsense, and is contradictory to my opponents argument itself: 1. It applies to my culture and your culture no less- if my opponent claims that all cultures are equal, then how can he rationally object to my advised course of actions in regard to banning FGM and going to war against countries who practice it? After all, I could say that it's my culture to ban FGM and torture those who practice it, and according to my opponent- there wouldn't be a damn thing wrong with it. 2. All cultures are not equal; a culture which practices FGM is inherently inferior to one which doesn't. Morality is not so subjective- if you took a regular person who wasn't indoctrinated into any culture or society, and knew only how to speak, he would automatically think of FGM as barbaric and savage. This is a clear proof that seeing FGM as such is not merely cultural, but rather the only rational conclusion that can be drawn from unabridged morality and reason. THAT CIRCUMCISION IS MUTILATION I am frankly disgusted by my opponent comparing FGM to circumcision, whilt the two aren't even comparable. This is like if a baby was born with a 3rd arm growing out of its back that had no flesh or bone in it but was rather just skin that was dirty and subject to infection, the doctors would by no doubt remove it. It isn't considered mutilation when you cut babies amebic cord is it? So how is circumcision any different? FGM on the other hand is like kidnapping someone, strapping them down, cutting them open, then ripping out their entrails and eating them like you were a zombie in the Walking Dead, then saying that he wanted it when the police arrest you. It isn't even comparable, and again, I am disgusted. Another point, FGM eliminates the females ability to feel pleasure, whilst circumcision has no such effects. FGM results in horrible infections, Circumcision does not. FGM removes an entire organ system, Circumcision removes a tiny bit of useless flesh that makes a male subject to infections, STD's, and frankly it's just gross. BODILY INTEGRITY Like I said before, if someone preforms FGM on themselves without being forced to or being indoctrinated into a sick culture, they are suffering from BIID (Bodily Integrity Identity Disorder), and needs help. Further, these girls who “consent” to FGM are not thinking straight, in fact many times they “consent” to it but later when they are older they begin thinking clearly and see it as barbaric. http://www.bbc.co.uk...