fight club is the best movie ever made.

Wow, exactly what I was suspecting in this debate, your heart as beautiful as you. I love seeing the heart at work, whether it be the Narrator expressing oneself in the story or whether it be a young woman expressing hers views of life. You are correct in saying the Narrator is "not-free". Often times when we narrate our own lives, our ambitions, our dreams, our hopes, our love, we can mistake them for not being free(I am not implying that you implied any of this). But freedom to me is to express one's feelings through logic, having logic incorporated into life that we have feelings and we will always act upon what we don't know; for such is the very existence of Humanity. Much like a Narrator expresses one in one's films, films being one's own logic. >>>>>his movie is a great focus on human's ability to think we are free when we are not, to think we are loved and special when we are not. I am trying to make a world where it's actually true that we can be loved. I understand what you were saying, but when I see these words, I see a person that knows the pain of being rejected simply because of one's brashness. Passion should drives us all, but sometimes it gets the better of us. What's most important at the end of the day is not whether we were right or wrong, it's having our loved ones be there to support us in the darkest and greatest moments of our lives. I disagree with saying that we are not special, for we are human, the first species that can create films for us to substantiate how we feel. We just have to find out what makes us human:). Fight Club creates an excellent example for how we are as a people. But the main character is only acting to create chaos, not fixing why we have the problem in the first place. LOTR's main character did things to solve the entire problem, destroy the inherent evil that caused so many of his world's pain. FC only destroyed banks, not the inherent evil to why he destroyed them. FC was a path more about destruction rather than ending the misery. LOTR was more about ending the misery rather than simply destroying something. It is not about how much power you have, but instead knowing when not to use it. "With great power comes great responsibility". A common wisdom in the Marvel films, where the hero does everything one can to save the day:). The very words we use to describe "who we are" have the power to change the mightiest of hearts. Even such a power should be "not-free". I want to express to my other opponent in another debate how even a 16 year-old "girl" will have more logic than he can ever have because of how he foolishly uses his "power" of words. But I know I must beat him with an objective tone so that his irrationality never poisons another mind. My overall point being that FC uses power to just destroy not save(I understand the argument how he's saving himself, but we can save ourselves with saving others as well) while LOTR saves everyone by the right means. That's ultimately what I'm arguing, the means to save is more to my liking with LOTR rather than FC(I understand he destroyed a few banks, but like I said it didn't solve the underline problem). Sincerely the most luck one could ever wish to my opponent, for such a heart should always free :). (Forest Gump is one of my favorites as well. I am autistic myself, so I can relate to his character of simply doing what only he knows to be true. The character's morality was truly an inspiration to me. Oh how I wish I could act as simple as him, but society didn't accept me like the people in the movie accepted him. That is the movie that made me feel miserable for being different(the hate you feel for Tyler). I haven't quite figured out how to love myself yet, it doesn't make any sense to me. But I have figured out how to love rest of Humanity, so I'm ok with that :).)