Once Saved Always Saved

If, as you say, "God can tell the future", then when you have a choice to do A or B, and God knows which you will choose then you don't really have a choice. If God knows you will do A, you will do A, regardless of how free your will may be. If I know exactly what you will do in the omnipotent sense, then you have no choice in the matter. You have done nothing to refute my argument against free will. You have in fact, given good reasons to deny the propositions (God can tell the future and god knows what you will do). Secondly, you have given no reason or Biblical response to my very clear Biblical notes that the Bible says people are, as the Calvinists claim, elected to salvation. Declaring something false does not qualify as an argument. You claim that salvation is for people who choose to live for God, however you conceded that "God can tell the future". So, even if one wishes to ignore the above argument, that free will doesn't exist, you would need to accept that when you have a choice between A and B, God will know which you choose. Now, if this choice is to choose if "they want to live for god" then God will know what choice they will make. Even ignoring the issue of free will, this is a distinction without a difference. You will do what God knows you will do. In either case, God knows who is saved and who isn't saved. As such, your salvation is known in advance. As such, your salvation is predetermined. As such, you are not saved repeatedly after each backslide. You are either saved or not saved. Secondly, even under your claim of temporary salvation, the very temporary nature of it shows that it is not salvation. If you were saved, you would not be going to hell. The idea that you could be "saved" and eventually end up in hell is incoherent. Salvation is the freedom from torture or punishment into a state of Grace. You can be saved in the sense that "if you died now you would go to heaven" but not in the sense that you are currently dead. Given this, you can only be saved once, and as heaven is for an eternity that salvation is for "always". The tangential argument of morality is not principle to the argument at hand. However to say that it is not your judgment to make is correct, however you make the exact judgment in your opening argument. You hold that OSAS is morally ambiguous because it allows this that and the other. Why do you have no right to judge when I offer a counter argument, but every right to judge when you put forth your argument? My argument was not that murder is acceptable, rather that if you held that Salvation is temporary and one may backslide, considering the eternity of pain and torture, the moral thing to do is to murder a potential backslider before they can backslide. Do unto others what you would have them do unto you. If you could be spared the fires of hell and granted eternal grace by being shot in the head by a friend, would you want that? If you could spare a friend the fires of hell by shooting him in the head, should you not do that unto him? You have failed to provide a cogent argument in favor of free will. I have provided an argument against free will, both Biblically and logically. I have refuted your claims against immorality of OSAS. I have argued that temporary salvation is both incoherent and immoral. All of your claims are refuted. None of my claims have been refuted.