The United States needs to vacate the Kingdom of Hawaii

"Countries need land. The civil war showed that the United Stated is unwilling to allow states to secede, even when a democratic majority (within any one state) insists they should do otherwise. The union in fact felt it must rise to extreme violence, to hold onto what it felt it must continue to have. There have been secession bids by members every state in the union. Were the United States to honor even half these requests, the union would cease to be, and thus fail to live or succeed. Releasing states would do the exact opposite of addressing the needs of the union."This is irrelevant, and it's a case for state to state, this is not for our debate."Were the above not enough reason, the fact remains that the majority of the people of Hawaii do not want to leave the union. Those wishing the United States to vacate Hawaii did a WhiteHouse.gov petition, not only did it fail to meet the signature threshold, but only an estimated 50 of the signers (under 3%) were Hawaiian locals (not even to say native peoples). Further compounding this base problem, only 10% of the population identifies themselves as Native Hawaiian. Thus it is even against the current needs to Hawaii." The majority of the people of Hawaii (Hawaiian blood) do want to leave the United States. A recent new report has been released on July 11th 2014 when "the federal government posed a series of questions to Native Hawaiians, with whom it's seeking to reestablish nation-to-nation status."[1] Americans will have no say in this, the United States invaded a country, and then made Americans vote on it becoming a state, forcing the Hawaiians to have no say. I have already proved this. The Kingdom of Hawaii is not a state, but a country illegally occupied by the United States."The Union has been there over a hundred and twenty years. Were Hawaii not American, most of the infrastructure would be. The notion of wanting American influence to vacate, reminds me of a Monty Python skit in which people want Romans to leave, “excluding those concerned with drainage, medicine, roads, housing, education, viniculture and any other Romans contributing to the welfare of [the native people]”This is irrelevant, Hawaii is a country being illegally occupied by the United States, as I have already proved. There's no justification on this. "Also Hawaii is a great vacation spot, which helps support the need for happiness within the Union." Hawaii has no interest on satisfying the Union just because the American people love Hawaii as a vacation spot, quit trying to insult me if this is what you are trying to do. “The overthrow in 1893 was illegal” This is not irrelevant, and never will be. Source [P4]: It has been illegally the "50th state" of the United States, as I have already proved this.“war crimes” "As the previous source implies, the happiness of the union has not been harmed by these supposed “war crimes,” instead Hawaii is a great tourism spot." The Union has harmed Hawaii, these are still war crimes despite what the American people think. And I have already proved this.Source [P3]: Claiming “international law” should involve a website for an international group such as the U.N. or N.A.T.O., not a biased one seemingly designed specifically to spread anti American propaganda. Do not insult my source and call it "biased", what the United States has done to Hawaii is biased. My source only speaks the truth. Bias means "prejudice in favour of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair."“The Hawaiian people demand their kingdom and sovereignty back”The Kingdom of Hawaii does not care for the US needs, they only care for their own country and people. “Queen of Hawaii demands independence” This is completely relevant to the Kingdom of Hawaii. "Plus obeying the whims of people based on their special blood, would hurt US needs."The Kingdom of Hawaii does not care if it hurts the US needs."As my opponent has listed Germany multiple times, should we consider well such policies worked there in the 1940’s?""The overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii refers to a coup d'état on January 17, 1893, in which anti-monarchical insurgents within the Kingdom of Hawaii, composed largely of United States citizens, engineered the overthrow of its native monarch"[2]"On January 16, 1893, United States Marines from the U.S.S Boston surrounded the palace of Queen Liliuokalani of Hawaii. The Queen was informed that a “provisional government” composed of American citizens had been established until such time as the island nation could be annexed by the United States. Queen Liliuokalani peacefully yielded power to avoid bloodshed and put her faith in the government of the United States to restore sovereignty to its peaceful Pacific trading partner. The story of how the U.S. came to invade this small island nation is a shameful but largely forgotten chapter in American history."[3]“International trade”This is completely relevant to the Kingdom of Hawaii.“Hawaiian Kingdom Civil Code”This is completely relevant to the Kingdom of Hawaii.So far my opponent has done nothing but insult and offend me on why the American people love Hawaii and how it would hurt the Union. My opponent is yet to prove that the Kingdom of Hawaii should not be vacated by the United States. I dismiss my opponent's "arguments", as well with his sources because he has done nothing but make claims of it hurting the Union, hurting the American people, etc. This has nothing to do with the American people, this has everything to do with the Hawaiians. Sources:[1] http://goo.gl..., http://goo.gl...[2] http://goo.gl...[3] http://goo.gl...