A Perfect Being Can Exist

1. Knowledge of GodActually there are no contradictions at all, Con is simply misunderstanding, a lot. He seems to neglect that everything has a context to it. God honors the righteous and dishonors the unrighteous, what's so hard to understand about that? God gives us life and He takes it away, only to give it to us once again for eternity, there isn't much of a contradiction here, if anything, if God can give life in the first place, then logically He must be able to take it away. These are the misunderstandings that Con seems to have with the attributes of God that I gave.Con says that for God to know everything and have free will at the same time is impossible. Well. Why? Just because you know everything that is, you're going to refuse to create and bless sentient beings like us with life and self-awareness? Yeah, that makes sense. A parent from an African wartorn village has a child with full knowledge of what their life is very likely to be like. It is the same here, God may know everything, but out of love, still created, still gave us an opportunity.Because God has free will, your formula completely fails. Just because God knows everything doesn't mean He doesn't bless us with the chance of life. And just because he doesn't right every single wrong, doesn't mean he doesn't do anything to help us out. 2. DemographicsCon's argument lies in that because religions all over the world seem to be cultural and theologically different, that they are all wrong. But he seems to neglect that so many religions around the world have many similiarities as well, and there is even a Perennial Philosophy found throughout the world.This Perennial Philosophy is found within Buddhism, Platonism, Neoplatonism, Daoism, Vedanta, Sufism, Gnosticism, Kabbalah, and more. These traditions all have the same Pantheistic and Panentheistic traits within them. They all teach what leads to either The All is God, or The All is one part of two pieces of God, with the second being a transcendent source of infinite production allowing us to be. As you can see, the demographics are hardly evidence for Atheism, if anything, they are evidence for Pantheism and Panentheism, because they all point to One God.3. The Problem of Free WillCon is again misunderstanding. He neglects to understand the context of many things, I am starting to wonder if this is intentional. Yes, there are many natural disasters, but there are also many things that counter those disasters, that bring about balance. Remember that one of God's names is The Maker of Perfect Harmony. Just as there is earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, there are magnificent harvests, people born with extremely high IQ's like Einstein, and much more. Not to mention that those earthquakes and volcanic eruptions are perfect parts of our perfect creation, so important that they are a big reason as to why the Earth is the way it is.Con says that if God were all-powerful, that He would have created man with a disposition towards good. Well, who is to say that He didn't? Not to mention that He has revealed Himself to us, to help guide us. And our very sentience is a disposition towards good, because so many people would think twice before taking an action that would make someone sad and cry, etc.Free will is a perfect explanation to it all, because you're free to choose between good and evil actions and paths. If you take away this possibility in any way at all, you have taken away true free will. Con wants to speak about the victims, but what of them? Now they rest in their graves, peacefully, awaiting the Last Day. If there was no possibility of victims suffering, there would be no possibility of assailants, and therefore no possibility of free will. This is pretty self-explanatory.4. The ClicheThis is where Con should lose conduct points, as I have already explained clearly as to why this is a cliche, and should not be used. I suppose I will explain this again.The tooth fairy and the concept of God are extremely different. One, God has revealed Himself to us through divine revelations throughout the world. Two, God has been concluded philosophically to be true by many philosophers. Three, the tooth fairy is clealy just mythological fairy tales for children, and nobody actually speaks of them as being real.Why should Con lose conduct points on this? Because of the other reason as to why it's a cliche. Obviously the concept of God and the idea of the tooth fairy are different, the tooth fairy is nowhere near the level of God, and Con knows this. The other reason is that this is a psychological warfare tactic. Think about it. If you're in a debate, and you demean the idea of God down to something that everybody sees as a fairy tale, you're not only insulting the other person, you're psychologically attacking them, and their concept of God, when He and the tooth fairy are nowhere near the same level.5. The Earth's ImperfectionsYou hear that, ladies? If you're not symmetrical, you're not perfect. I'll be sure to remind Con's future wife of this. As to what the Catholic Church has to say about the elliptical orbit, this has no impact on me, and hardly on anybody today. Why? Because we now know why the orbit is elliptical, and it is perfect that way because of those reasons. I have already explained this.The same applies to the shape of the Earth. Again, why does it have to be a perfect circle in order to be perfect?Con seems to think that because the eye had to go through a complex and beautiful process of evolution, that we are not perfect. No, evolution is the perfect tool of creating life within the perfect creation. And why not combine the drinking passage with the breathing? That's pretty damn awesome that we can do two, completely different things all in one. People die of choking, but they also live, I guess it was just their day to die.Nothing is imperfect. And my challenge from my last rebuttal still stands. If he finds all of these to be imperfect, I challenge him to show me scientifically and logically, how he would create the perfect universe, or, what is perfect in his eyes.The definition of perfect is subjective, everything is in perfect balance, therefore every part is perfect, and because every part is perfect, the creation is perfect, and logically consistent with a perfect God.