World Peace

Well you win, but i have to say a few things before. -And I quote"That's actually not true. The Romans just took over the Greeks. They didn't work together." You made an error, i meant the 2 countries made war within themselves to make peace. I know that after Alexander, the greeks were weak and all, romans conquered them not in the pace i said but you know what i mean. I did not mean at any point that they were working together, that would be like seeing a cat and a dog getting along, i know some have but you know my meaning. They actually had a big problem after Christ, because there were Christians, and many other religions, so eventually the roman emperor Constantine decided to make all of Roman land christian because he prayed to god and won a big battle. -I quote "1. The conflict is not a political question as much as it is a religious one. Their conflict is at the very core of their beliefs, and for that reason, we can't stop them." Well the battle maybe over religious believes, but there is something called the separation of church and state, making it impossible for radicals to rule a country. -I quote "3. You suggest a revolution. But again, the conflict is not political. It is religious." Yes but if missiles are being aimed at the other countries, and the government does not take care of the situation because of their incapacity to act, then there is no other choice to remove the said government. - I quote "Also, you have to answer all the other groups too." Well you asked me to answer to those 2, not to the rest, I can probably answer to those others as well. - I quote "You provide no warrant as to how another world war will bring world peace." Well I thought providing legit historical facts was good. - I quote "FYI, a fiat is just a form of argumentation (if it can be called that) where you justify something for the sake of the argument, but there is no real justification. A fiat would be like, There are unicorns in the world, and for that reason we have to stop deforestation. I haven't proven unicorns to exist, but for the sake of the argument, we can accept it. Maybe. In this case, a world war cannot be fiated." Yes i know what a flat, is but how else can I present world peace. - I quote "1. History has shown us otherwise. We've seen 2 World Wars, each one incredibly bloody, and we have no world peace. So immediately, we can see that another world war won't solve anything." Well those wars, weren't exactly about world peace, though. One mostly about showing who's stronger . and the other one about a little man making a country big in little time, but having very little to think about how big the world is compared to him, he did though try to take over the world, and took over Europe, though. He lost because some country had to attack pearl harbor and get the Americans involved . -I quote " That's great. You want to instigate a huge world war III and unify everyone through one government, and that will create world peace? Also, you fail to provide a warrant as to how we are going to get world peace." Well, umm yeah practically, yup. More like, eh well, I want it to be that any country that opposed this peace would be crushed, yes yes, fascism, but as long as the masses are happy would it matter to them, not really. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ And well that's about it, thank you again, I'm very new to this though, never really knew a argument would go this way. I hope i can learn alot more from you friend, thanks. Sincerely Skar.