Women's dress sizes should be limited by law

1. The photo examples that my opponent gave are random photographs of British women and Asian women and are arbituary as proven by these. These are far from fat slags http://bp1.blogger.com... http://farm1.static.flickr.com... http://www.ibiza-voice.com... Asians that I wouldn't bang http://jokes.m3rlin.org... http://media3.guzer.com... http://www.starling-fitness.com... 2. Far East Asian countries have just as many if not even more overweight/obese women as the UK which further supports my first argument that men in both parts of the world have equal pools of women to choose from and that my opponents photos where just extreme examples that are far from the norm. http://english.chosun.com... http://www.tehrantimes.com... 3. My opponent's www.dh.gov.uk evidence is irrelevant to the round. It says nowhere in that piece of evidence that the UK government is failing miserably in its attempts to curb obesity in UK women. I however, provide clear evidence that specifically states that the UK government is on the right track for fighting obesity in the UK through changing its views on urban planning and restructuring http://www.timesonline.co.uk... 4. The plan has major flaws. a. If a law where passed to limit dress sizes, then all of the overweight women would simply just squeeze themselves into a dress that is the largest size available to them. (In the case of my opponents propsition, a size 12uk) Their extremely tight outfits would cause their rolls of fat to spill over the top of their dress. Also, every dress worn by a fatty would automatically become a sleevless dress due to the sleeves either tearing or being pushed all the way up the shoulder due to large arm circumference, which would in turn, force surrounding males to have to look at all of their jiggly arm fat that grotesquely hangs under their arms whenever they wave at someone or move their hands above their head to the music. (but only for a little while of course because I assume they would tire quickly.) Thus the plan would have the opposite affect as intended. Instead of causing men to see more hot dames in the clubs, they will just see more fatties (or at least more OF them) b. There is nothing in my opponent's plan that would prevent these fatties from buying a fashionable dress over the internet. There are a lot of major high fashion designers in places other than the uk. (such as New York, Los Angeles, Milan, Madrid, Tokyo, etc. The UK government obviously has no jurisdiction over other countries, so these fat slags could easily buy a high fashion designer dress in their (double digit) size that is made in another country via internet and wear them out to clubs in the UK. Thus such a law would provide no incentive whatsoever for weight loss since designer dresses in large sizes would still be available. c. Furthermore, my opponent provided no actual evidence that the majority of overweight women in the UK care about fashion. All he did was ASSUME that women like to read fashion magazines and spend a lot of money on clothes and had no actual evidence to back those assumptions up with. Furthermore, If you look at the pictures that my opponent provided, you will notice that none of the fat slags in those photos are dressed fashionably, which would in turn make it fair to conclude that fat chicks in the UK don't care about high fashion and dressing fashionably. Therefore if the fat women dont care, there is no incentive for them to lose weight. This alone should cause you to vote for Con (against) because there is only one piece of evidence in the round that is relevant to the argument of women caring about fashion. This piece of evidence is my opponent's photos which clearly support my argument that fat women in the UK don't care about buying and wearing fashionable dresses. Therefore, you must give my arguments full weight in the round because I have solid evidence to back up my arguments where as my opponent merely states random arguments with nothing to back them up. The above reasons are all factors to why the UK government hasn't and won't ever adopt such a law. Like the UK government, you as well, should reject my opponent's proposal by voting for con/against.