Transgenders should use the restrooms according to their gender

I read both of your articles and found them very interesting. The Daily Wire one seemed to have no real problems with it. However, one could point out that if this were a commonly occurring problem (creeps claiming that they were transgender to get into women's restrooms), they would give a statistic instead of telling lots of details about isolated incidents. If it were a commonly occurring problem, they would actually say how many people in total had tried or succeeded in doing this. So essentially, all that I got from that article was, "Over the course of several years, in places all over the United States, a country that has 318,900,000 people, there have been five incidences of sexual harassment or voyeurism by people who claimed to be transgender." Now onto the Breitbart article. Ah, Breitbart. I can't say that I'm particularly fond of it. "On its corporate website, for instance, there are many posts and announcements celebrating the LGBT lifestyle. Furthermore, last year, Target was a corporate sponsor of the 'Out & Equal' conference, a summit aimed at forcing corporations into adopting gay-friendly workplace policies. The company was also praised by gay groups for its 'It Gets Better' campaign meant to boost the status of homosexuality in the U.S." The article refers to these programs as a "radical homosexual agenda." So in the first seven paragraphs, this article has already struck me as an exceedingly biased, sensationalistic article that is prone to misinterpreting and exaggerating even the simplest of information. Next, I look at the title. It says, "Top Twenty-Five Stories Proving Target"s Pro-Transgender Bathroom Policy Is Dangerous to Women and Children." The funny thing is that, first of all, none of these twenty-five stories actually have anything to do with Target. The even funnier thing is that only five of these twenty-five stories involve people taking advantage of transgender bathroom laws to carry out malicious activities. The other twenty are just stories of people sneaking into women's bathrooms. So only 20% of the stories they list actually have anything to do with gender-neutral bathrooms, yet in the title they claim that all of their stories are to prove that gender-neutral bathrooms are bad. This article is therefore misleading at best. So, because of these five stories that they list, they say that we should ban gender-neutral bathrooms, right? But, even though 80% of their stories are incidents involving gender-specific bathrooms, I don't see them suggesting that we ban gender-specific bathrooms. The irony of this article is killing me. Now onto your arguments. You said, "I don't know of any Transgenders their own restrooms and get abused. Especially sexually. No offense but don't you think that it's a little odd for someone to sexually abuse a transgender? Most people tend to stay away from them." This is objectively not true. According to a government site, " One in two transgender individuals are sexually abused or assaulted at some point in their lives. Some reports estimate that transgender survivors may experience rates of sexual assault up to 66 percent, often coupled with physical assaults or abuse." Since there are about 700,000 transgender people, this means that 350,000 to 455,000 transgender people have been sexually assaulted or abused. And yet you claim that this never happens. Next, you claim that policies such as North Carolina's recently passed law are perfectly constitutional and do not violate the Equal Protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment. I would like to point out that the current situation involves men and women using the bathroom of the gender they identify with. Under policies such as these, this privilege would not be granted to transgenders, hence violating the aforementioned amendment. Secondly, if it were perfectly constitutional, why would the federal government be suing the state of North Carolina? The country's top legal experts and constitutional scholars--people who know the Constitution better than you, better than me, and better than most of the rest of us--are saying that this law is unconstitutional. Why should you know better than them? Thank you. Here's the source for the data I cited earlier: http://www.ovc.gov...