THBT humans are not experiencing (nor under threat of) overpopulation

Rebuttals. "Topic 1: Climate Change" This argument is irrelevant, as it still fails to prove whether overpopulation is the cause of Climate change. "Topic 2: Pollution and Consumption" "However, a lot of the countries encompassing Europe is attempting to help out 3rd world countries in need, so far they have reduced the hunger problem by 10%; unfortunately though, 550 billion litres of fresh water is wasted per year in agriculture. We are setting ourselves up for an overpopulated world that"s lacking nutrients. " Much of what is said is a reuslt of overconsupmtion , not necessarily overpopulation. "Topic 4: Overpopulation on a smaller sclae" "The last topic I want to bring up is that overpopulation can be city wide or country wide, we can have a lot of people in a single area and the rest of the world could be lush and free, what really determines overpopulation? Is it the global crisis that everyone is in danger of death due to the limitations of the earth? Or is it the limitations of the community in general? I could give examples of china and japan having overpopulation problems, and simply use the smog as an example, people wearing surgical masks in public to avoid the consumption of toxic chemicals, people wearing long clothes so they are not intoxicated by the gases. The acid rain and dying out of populations of animals. We have the panda bear as an example of this. " Japan is actually facing a risk of underpopulation. Due to Japan's extremely low fertility rate, the retiring population vastly outnumbers the working population. Europe and North America would also have been facing the same problem had it not been for immigration. China's fertility rate is also noticeably low and is still dropping, meaning that the population will likely dip in later years. The main reason why China is far more polluted has very little to do with population and more to do with industry. China in the past few decades has seen radical industrial development, when Britain was experiencing the Industrial Revolution, they were experiencing similar pollution problems as modern China. Once more, this argument is irrelevant in proving overpopulation as you have stated previously that those events were the result of pollution . "Rebuttal" "An issue I have with your graph is, we are still growing in population, regardless of how many children people are having in today"s generation, simply because the world is growing shows the graph to be intellectually dishonest in terms of accuracy with population sizes. The truth is, we have so many people that if every woman was to give birth to only one child, we would probably see an increase in population before it dropped off. " The graphs shows how the population is growing, the fertility rate also shows how the population may grow or decline in later years. Whether or not a country has a high population, if the fertility rate is too low, then the population will decline. Conclusion: Due to the dropping fertility rate of many countries, and the less land that is required to grow more food. It therefore shows that humans are not experiencing nor under threat of overpopulation.