BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
george bush was a good presidnet

George Bush was one of america greatest leaders in American History he did many things 1. He passes massive tax relief for the american people because they needed and that setted off huge job growth for many years he greatly stimulated the economy 2. He freed Iraq took out a very bad man and leader 3. He greatly wiped out al queda and the taliban 4. He worked hard to stop the econmic collaspe 5. he tried to reform socil sercuirty and add life to it 6. he reformed immigration with more security at the border and guest worker program 7. he made america more safe 8. the econmy was booming under him 9. he passed the clean air act that cleaned the air 10. he reformed medicare making it better for millions of seniors
Ask a Question.

Oh i'm sorry, ma'am. What was the most embarrassing moment of your life?-In third grade when my school went to the pool for a field trip I jumped into the water with such force my pants came half off. I got out of the pool before I noticed and revealed my "unit" to the entire school. What's your favorite color?- My favorite color is blue. Do you drink?- Yeah I'm a big fan of water. Do you prefer cats or dogs?- Cats simply because of their ninja like qualities. Do you like guns?- I'm not a big fan of guns, I don't have anything against them either. What do you think of this economy?- I assume you are talking about the U.S economy. I think the economy is in a horrible spot at the moment. How did you came upon DDO?- By complete accident, I was looking for debate topics at school and found the site. Now for my own questions. Can you teach me how to dougie? Are you for or against Adolf Hitler? Is Faker the best mid player in the world? Did we just fall in love? You made this 5 rounds, That's a lot of questions. Who do you think I am, Jesus?
Ask a Question.

Firs to correct you, I'm a girl so it would be ma'am. What was the most embarrassing moment of your life? What's your favorite color? Do you drink? Do you prefer cats or dogs? Do you like guns? What's your favorite gun? (If yes to above question) What is your favorite music? /Artist? What do you think of this economy? How did you came upon DDO? This is all for right now. :)
Ask a Question.

Ask a question, any question can be personal, and you have to be honest with the answer. lol Rules: 1. If I tell you to please stop doing something, please be curious, 2. have fun 3. Try to get to know as much as possible bout each other. 4. Have to be funny questions and are answerable. 5. Well have fun. There will be 5 rounds. you can ask as many questions as you want in each round. Good luck! lol :)
Ask a Question.

What goes on in your head?- More than I would like to share. Mostly just random stories that I think of at the time. Do you believe in drug legalization?- Yes I believe that drug legalization would be a wise choice. This is because drugs are used regardless of the restrictions society puts on them. If we legalize the drugs there will be less violence over such drugs. Do you believe in Evolution?- Simply based on facts yes. Evolution has far more supporting evidence than any other theory. How fluent are you in those languages you listed?- I'm not very fluent in either French or Japanese but very fluent in internet. What are your views on same sex marriage?- I believe that any two humans should have the right two marry one another. What are your views on abortion?- I am one hundred percent pro choice. If someone really doesn't want to have a baby they won't, with abortion there is a safe, legal way to deal with this. If abortion was illegal people would simply get riskier illegal abortions. Even though this is the last round I will ask my questions (answer in the comments if you want :P) Why did you give your life to Christ? Do you ever believe that god may not exist? Why am I going to hell? Did we fake the moon landing? How can I ask the woodchuck if he is dead? Do you agree that I am most likely of wolf decent? Thanks for this debate, it was fun.
Ask a Question.

What's with what extremely creepy smiley face? ( :} ) I don't know. Have you ever been so mad you grew an extra arm? No, thank goodness, I rarely get mad. Why are you christian? Because I gave my life to Christ. If I have three socks but only one foot should i cry? No, deal with it. What's your favorite pokemon? Picacho do you "gotta catch em all?" huh? How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if I shot it in the face? I don't know, ask the woodchuck. lol Where are we heading in this life? To hell. This was my last round Enjoy voting folks. My turn. What goes on in your head? Do you believe in drug legalization? Do you believe in Evolution? How fluent are you in those languages you listed? What are your views on same sex marriage? What are your views on abortion? Thank you for this opportunity. I have learned a lot about you. Hopefully we get to talk outside this debate. Voters: Please vote fairly.
Ask a Question.

Where are you getting this idea I'm in love with you? - Most likely my brain. What do you think of Obama's views. (Overall)?- I agree with what he says but not what he does. What grade are you in in high school?- I am in eleventh grade. Do you believe in global Warming?- Simply looking at the facts yes I believe in global warming. What's your favorite food to eat?- The souls of new born babies. If you would have a time machine; where would you want to go?- Assuming I could come back to the present, I would enjoy going millions of years into the future. If you could be any superhero who would you be?- If I could be any super hero I would be the flash and join cross country and track. Do you know any other language than English?- I slightly speak French, Japanese, and internet. My turn. What's with what extremely creepy smiley face? ( :} ) Have you ever been so mad you grew an extra arm? Why are you christian? If I have three socks but only one foot should i cry? What's your favorite pokemon? do you "gotta catch em all?" How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if I shot it in the face? Where are we heading in this life?
Ask a Question.

Why are you wrong about faker? My preference; there are others that are better. Do I seem like a transcendent being? hmmm. No I don't think so. Whats your favorite bread of walrus? I don't have a favorite. Do you prefer bacon or world war three? Well, in this situation, bacon. I despise bacon and I don't want WWIII. So I will settle for bacon. Did you take my wallet? Nope, *Checks* I got mine. Why are you in love with me? I never said I was in love with you. My turn. Where are you getting this idea I'm in love with you? What do you think of Obama's views. (Overall)? What grade are you in in high school? Do you believe in global Warming? What's your favorite food to eat? If you would have a time machine; where would you want to go? If you could be any superhero who would you be? Do you know any other language than English? Your turn. :)
Ask a Question.

Why do you think we just fall in love?- I can just sense these things. Why do you think this country is corrupt?- I never said this country is corrupt. Do you agree with Obama?- Do I agree with Obama on what? What country are you from?- I'm from the United States. What are your views on the war with Syria?-There is no reason for us to go to war with Syria when we don't have our own country under control. What do you do in your spare time?- I play video games, watch anime, read manga, and hang out with friends on my spare time. What is your favorite school subject?- My favorite subject is physics. My turn. Why are you wrong about faker? Do I seem like a transcendent being? Whats your favorite bread of walrus? Do you prefer bacon or world war three? Did you take my wallet? Why are you in love with me?
Ask a Question.

Can you teach me how to dougie? I just might. Are you for or against Adolf Hitler? I'm against. Is Faker the best mid player in the world? Ah I doubt it. Did we just fall in love? not that I'm aware of. You made this 5 rounds, That's a lot of questions. Who do you think I am, Jesus? Maybe. My questions. Why do you think we just fall in love? Why do you think this country is corrupt? Do you agree with Obama? What country are you from? What are your views on the war with Syria? What do you do in your spare time? What is your favorite school subject? Ok.. your turn. lol :)
India plays a very important role in maintaining democratic situation in Southern Asia

My Opponent has perhaps forgotten that one of the major threats to Pakistan is precisely its neighbor - India. These two nations have been in conflict with one another ever since India won their independence from the British. To think that India could play a role in creating a stable government in Pakistan, while at the same time being enemies, is a contradiction on its own. Bangladesh has one of the worst human rights problems in the world when it comes to the exploitation of women in the workforce. Millions of women in Bangladesh work under slave-like conditions and this is well known to the international community. India is fully aware of this problem and has done little to nothing to resolve it. Is this the form of democratic government that India offers to the region? India itself is far from being truly democratic when it has for centuries maintained a racist caste system in which the darker-skinned population is discriminated against in nearly all aspects of life. Hundreds of thousands of Indian citizens are living in abject poverty with not even basic sanitation or clean water and my Opponent would have us believe that India is in a stable position to clean up the houses of other nations in the region. India has an epidemic of farmers committing suicide because of the oppressive conditions being placed upon them by multinational companies like Monsanto. The government does little to address the issue because large rich corporations have major influence on national policies. The merger of state and corporate interests is not democracy, but rather fascism. India is in no position to play any major role in maintaining democracy in Southern Asia.
There is Undeniable, Empirical, Impartial Evidence for The Resurrection Of Jesus

Thanks Pro for taking up the task. Though I do find that your argument is entirely Off Topic. This is about finding proof that Jesus of The New Testament was Resurrected. From your challenge, it appears that you have no such Proof. God is not the Basis of Christianity, Jesus Christ is the Basis of Your Christianity. The God is the God of Abraham which is also the Basis of Judaism and Islam. So essentially you are saying you are a Jew and an Muslim, because your argument is for their God as well. Yet, you claim to be a Redneck Christian, whose religion is based entirely on the story of the Resurrection of Jesus.] Though some Christian churches, now consider that the Resurrection was only Metaphorical. If there was any real evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus of (some place that was not Nazareth), then those churches would not be in the position where they have to consider it as only a Metaphor to keep believers. On the question of the existence of the God of Abraham and Proof of the Resurrection of Jesus, I will let Modern Philosophers and New Testament Scholars answer that for me. Firstly on God and Pro's religious standing, from a highly respected modern Philosopher in Sam Harris. http://www.youtube.com... Secondly on the Resurrection from one of the highest New Testament Scholars alive. Bart Ehrman. http://www.youtube.com... I have only 2 questions regarding the Biblical, Old Testament God that Pro is attempting to Assert the Existence of, though without providing any Genuine, Testable Evidence for. Q1: If God created the Universe, Where did the God Come From if Time did not Exist Prior to the Creation Of The Universe? Q2: If God is such a Good God, then why is the Bible God such a Malevolent, Narcissistic, Murderous, Megalomaniac? BTW: The Bible does actually have sections where God admits these Qualities for itself.' Q3: If God is The Source of Morality, why were other Godless cultures that existed before the time the Bible was created were also Equally Moral. Q4: Why does the Bible God set such a bad Example of Morality if it was supposed to be the epitome of Morality. Jesus or those writing the Gospels borrowed Eastern philosophies (Do unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You) for Christianity, as those philosophies existed centuries before Jesus was born. I look forward to Pro's Redneck response! As I have always been curious how Rednecks approach those questions. I'm interested in learning your concepts.
There is Undeniable, Empirical, Impartial Evidence for The Resurrection Of Jesus

You done over stepped yourself boy, this is a Mississippi god fearin red neck you're dealin with. Don't tread on me son cause your about to get shut down. 1. If god aint real then how come we are here? 2.why is god answerin my prayers? 3.dont you think if we didn't have the good lords guidance we would still lack morality and complete understanding of the universe that we have? 4. god created the universe in 7 days.. not jus earth 5. why did we ever develop senses? 6. Why in the sam hill are we even arguing this boy? 7. evolution is a scam made by the devil! 8.god fearin Christians are morally good! so don't you think that's gud proof?
There is Undeniable, Empirical, Impartial Evidence for The Resurrection Of Jesus

I will Allow Pro the privalege of giving all the Evidence for his case First.I will then respond to Pro's evidence.Pro will have a chance of mounting a final case for his defense.Firstly I'll simply define the term Evidence.In Science which is this category: Evidence must be verifiable by those wishing to research.Science judges evidence on it's empirical strengths.In the case of historical evidence for an event. 1 - Was it from independent sources? 2 - Were those sources contemporary eye-witnesses? 3 - Is there Archaeological Evidence existing for the Event? 4 - Is there documentation from contemporary non-witnesses close to the event, such as local dignitaries, officials, historians or personal contacts with those witnessing the event. 5 - If the Event was miraculous and paranormal, which in Historical Science is an event of least Probability:Is the evidence so overwhelmingly fantastic and strong that it is absolutely undisputable? For something as magical and supernatural as somebody being resurrected from the dead, to be accepted in Historical research, it must confirm a definite, Indisputable YES to all 5 questions.A failing on any one of those, and, no, Jesus or actually nobody was ever Resurrected.Because a Supernatural event such as a Resurrection must have Supernatural Evidence.The belief of millions of people and presentation of hand-me-down, or hearsay evidence long after de-fact is definitely not supernatural.As in a thousand years time, the same could be said about Superman as is now said about Jesus. Though Gotham City didn't exist, but, neither did Nazareth while Jesus lived.Your turn Pro?????
Women Should not be Considered for Front Line Combat Roles, and Additionally Excluded From the Draft

Ah, true, I suppose there are a few other things women do need. I don't know why I didn't think of that in the earlier round. I don't see how it would be too big of an issue however. The woman would just have to put up with a period potentially going on while in combat. This is something that the woman likely would think about before entering the military and perhaps can solve the issue herself. There are other solutions, for example, birth control pills usually prevent a period from occuring. They wouldn't need anything else beyond that, and they could just take that pill while they are not in combat. And as for the standards again, I don't think every single woman who tried to enter the military didn't meet the original high standards, which as you stated, the drop out rate was 85%, and not 100%. While the drop out rate is at 85%, why not allow the 15% to be in the military? I don't think the hygienic issues are big enough reasons to prevent them from entering the military, and I offered a way in which the woman can choose to solve the issue. Regarding that women would be a liability, I don't think they would be if we kept the standards high. The very few women who are the best of the best women, the 15% mind you, would probably not be a liability, especially if they were able to handle all of the hygienic issues you mentioned. It would probably be a good idea for them to be on a birth control pill that blocks menstruation. I don't see why any women who does that, and who meets the original standards for the military, can't be in the military. They would not be a liability. I again bring up my previous example: was Leigh Ann Hester a liability to the military?
Women Should not be Considered for Front Line Combat Roles, and Additionally Excluded From the Draft

I would like to point out that my opponent is not providing any sources for a lot of these claims, this should be taken into account when voting. I don't personally know the standards of the military or what they were originally. I can't confirm that what pro is saying how the original standards for women were lower than that for men is true. I'm not even sure where to begin looking for that to be honest, I can easily find the current standards, but I can't seem to find the original standards, from say, decades ago, or when the first time we allowed women to serve in the front lines. My opponent's argument, is thus, a little weaker because they are not providing sources for this information and I am unable to confirm it myself with my own research. Regardless, if we were to assume that the original standards were different for men and women, I would argue we should have the standards be the same for men and women and have them high, because we need good quality soldiers. Once more, I ask, why if a woman were to meet high standards that are the same that a man has to meet, why they should not be allowed to serve? Now, it seems my opponent as mostly ignored my example of Leigh Ann Hester and how well she responded in a serious situation, and how there are other women like her in the military(one only needs to look up "Women who have received silver stars in the military" to see that there are more women like her). I would like to ask my opponent again, why should women like Leigh Ann Hester be denied the front lines?My opponent has mostly ignored the point I brought up with women who meet the standards, all they said was this: "Now addressing the very rare percentile of women who can compete with a male counterpart, all I have to say is this. The aspect of hygiene still applies, and while in this case it would be much cheaper to supply these few women, why not replace them with a perfectly suitable male unit who does not come at this added expense?"They seem to be referring to something they said previously about hygiene, to which I would reply: the military could just provide basic things both genders need. For the most part, women don't need specialized women's hygiene products to still be hygenically clean. My girlfriend, for example, uses a lot of male products, such as male deodorant and other things. She is perfectly fine with that. The only reason many women are not okay with that is probably because they want specific smells and softer skin. These things are not necessary, and the military could easily make the decision to provide the same things for both women and men. It's not like women absolutely need their specialized hygiene products. While they may complain about it, they can make due with the same stuff men do, like my girlfriend does. Alternatively, I would say that the military could just not provide any of these products for anyone, and just raise the compensation they give to their soldiers so that they can buy these things themselves. That's another solution.
Women Should not be Considered for Front Line Combat Roles, and Additionally Excluded From the Draft

Thanks for a timely response. First and foremost I turn back to Marine Corps standards, along with all our armed forces. The original standards were already lower in many physical categories for women before they were dropped, due to a nearly 0 sum pass rate. This in my opinion is unacceptable. While I do not question a woman's conviction to serve, I do question their capacity to do so. Front line combat is one of the most physically intense experiences and individual can endure, and the preparedness determines their ability to survive. Opting to send a weaker unit into combat is not only endangering that unit, but the other forces that work with it. This is where we must set aside social adherence's for the sake of preserving a effective fighting force. The fact is that women are the least effective unit to put into a combat role. Even those who did manage to pass the former standards would be at a disadvantage still. You have also failed to address the basic concept of a woman needing more rigorous hygienic support in order to maintain full function. This alone makes them a liability compared to their male counterpart, as these supplies may not be readily available on the front. Also, their are two duties in combat. One, to your country, and two, to your fellow soldiers. In the event of letting them down, you may also get them killed, or yourself, putting them in danger. My opponent has acknowledged that women are physically inferior to a male specimen, so I propose this: if you create a joint unit of male and females, the males will inevitably be forced to pick up slack where the female is not as capable. This can range from transporting equipment to simple physical labor. These added responsibilities may deduct from their fighting capacity, and in turn raise the likelihood of a casualty. Then you might propose all male units and all female units. The question then is, why not only have male units, as they are more capable. This is inevitably the conclusion I and many other members of our fighting forces, and even women have concluded. Women and men have their respective roles, and front line combat is a male responsibility. We are better suited and better trained to do so. Women can be involved in the fighting forces, outside these roles. Now addressing the very rare percentile of women who can compete with a male counterpart, all I have to say is this. The aspect of hygiene still applies, and while in this case it would be much cheaper to supply these few women, why not replace them with a perfectly suitable male unit who does not come at this added expense?
Women Should not be Considered for Front Line Combat Roles, and Additionally Excluded From the Draft

I concur with generally what my opponent has said, that women typically tend to be built biologically weaker for upper-body strength and such. However, does this justify preventing all women from being able to serve? I would say no. There are above-average women who could be as strong or stronger than men. There are women who can work well in combat. One such woman is Leigh Ann Hester, who received a silver star for her bravery when her squad was being ambushed in Iraq. [1]Now, I'm not sure if the Marines really has dropped their training standards in order to accomodate women, but if they have, this is a problem. However, the solution is not to bar women from the front lines. Why not keep the original standards and let women who happen to meet them in the military? Is there anything wrong with the original standards? If a woman who meets the original standards wants to fight in the front line, then why not?Additionally, for the draft, it could still keep the standards. Only women who meet the standards would be drafted. Now, if we did keep high standards for the military, we would probably see fewer women in the military, because as my opponent said which I am not challenging, women are not built like men are when it comes to developing muscle, having as big of a frame, etc. But, the thing is, not every woman is the typical woman. There are extraordinary women like Leigh Ann Hester who are formidable soldiers. Why should they be denied being allowed in front line combat roles?Sources:[1] https://en.wikipedia.org...