It is more reasonable to believe in the Christian God than not to

Is Jehovah Guilty of Murder?No. Jehovah God can do as He wishes, although His wishes are constrained by His character, so He can't wish something that is immoral or inconsistent with His character. And, really, there is nothing immoral about the Giver of Life taking away the life that He gave in the first place as a sentence for the detestable things wicked people do. Why did Jehovah Destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, and is There Evidence?Ezekiel 16:49, 50 - "Look! This was the error of Sod′om your sister: She and her daughters were proud and had an abundance of food and carefree tranquillity; yet they did not support the afflicted and the poor. They remained haughty and carried on detestable practices in my sight, so I found it necessary to remove them."Genesis 19 records that two angels disguised as men visited Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot met the angels in the city square and insisted that they stayed at his house, so they went with him to his house where Lot made a feast for them, and they ate. The chapter then informs us, "Before they could lie down to sleep, the men of the city—the men of Sod′om from boy to old man, all of them—surrounded the house in one mob. And they kept calling out to Lot and saying to him: 'Where are the men who came in to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we may have sex with them.'" The angels then blinded all the men of Sodom and Gomorrah and urged Lot and his family to flee from the cities to escape the Wrath Jehovah was about to deliver. As you can see, Jehovah had more than enough reason to destroy these wicked people. But, is there evidence He did? Yes, there is:"The five cities of the plain have been located and the evidence is staggering. For the first time in modern history we have found round balls of brimstone, or nearly pure sulfur, embedded in an ashen area near the Dead Sea, which show clear signs of having once been ancient building structures!" Source: http://www.arkdiscovery.com...;Why did Jehovah send the ten Plagues, and is There Evidence for the Exodus?Jehovah sent Moses to free the his people, many which were children and elderly people, from the oppresive slavery of the Egyptians. But the stubborn Pharaoh refused to free them, which is why God sent the ten plagues. Is there extra-biblical evidence for this? We have the Ipuwer Papyrus, "an ancient document that provides a possible independent record of the ten plagues in Egypt". Source: http://www.gotquestions.org...And, surely, if approximately two million Israelites traveled across the Sinai wilderness on their way to Canaan, there should be evidence, and there is:"From 1972-1982 the Ben-Gurion University (in Israel) conducted an extensive archaeological survey of the northern Sinai area. They documented 284 sites in northern Sinai where pottery shards and other remains of ancient occupation were found. These sites were arranged in groups with larger sites in the center and smaller sites on the outer edges of the group. They found that the larger center sites were 'base sites' where central activities (such as buying and selling) occurred, that the medium-size sites were family living areas, and the small outer sites were encampments for shepherds. They found that the people who lived at these sites were nomadic, wandering from place to place. They said 'In most of the sites there is no evidence of solid building, and it looks as if the inhabitants lived in booths, tents, or lean-tos.' Gerald E. Aardsma, Ph.D., showed back in 1995 that these encampment sites were made by the Israelites early in the Exodus. They reveal, in fact, the first three stops along the route of the Exodus: Succoth, Etham, and Pi-hahiroth. These Sinai sites fit the Biblical account very well."Source: http://www.biblicalchronologist.org...Why did Jehovah wipe out humanity with a Flood, and is There Evidence? "We don't have all the explanations as to how the evidence came to be that way, and it may be that in the future we will discover some human fossils. However, there is also much about the fossil record that the evolutionists have a hard time explaining. On the other hand, we should also realize that we don't have all the answers either [...]. Even though God has left us with evidence for creation and the Flood, the Bible still says that without faith it is impossible to please and believe Him (Hebrews 11:6). Because we weren't there at the time of the Flood we cannot scientifically prove exactly what happened, so there will always be aspects that will involve our faith. However, it is not blind faith. As we have investigated the evidence, we have seen nothing to contradict what the Bible says about a world Flood. We can be satisfied that there are reasonable explanations, consistent with Scripture, for the seeming lack of human fossils in Flood rocks."Source: http://www.christiananswers.net...; Although we don't have indisputable human fossils that we could say belong to the pre-flood world, the Flood was possible. The water came from above of an expanse Jehovah made in the second "day" as a division between the waters below and the waters above. And, apparently, that water that covered the tallest mountains is still right here, on Earth. You can read about that with more detail in this debate I am having with AtheistPerson about the flood(http://www.debate.org...). Also, we don't lack evidence for the flood. Such a cataclysmic Flood which washed the whole world of that time would never be forgotten by the survivor. They would talk about it to their children, and their children's children. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia says,"Flood stories have been discovered among nearly all nations and tribes. Though most common on the Asian mainland and the islands immediately south of it and on the North American continent, they have been found on all the continents. Totals of the number of stories known run as high as about 270 . . . The universality of the flood accounts is usually taken as evidence for the universal destruction of humanity by a flood and the spread of the human race from one locale and even from one family. Though the traditions may not all refer to the same flood, apparently the vast majority do. The assertion that many of these flood stories came from contacts with missionaries will not stand up because most of them were gathered by anthropologists not interested in vindicating the Bible, and they are filled with fanciful and pagan elements evidently the result of transmission for extended periods of time in a pagan society. Moreover, some of the ancient accounts were written by people very much in opposition to the Hebrew-Christian tradition." The Bible is Historical and has PropheciesWhile the historical accuracy alone is not evidence for the Christian God, we certainly would not expect historical innacuracies in God's word. And the book of Daniel was completed by Daniel in the year 536 B.C.E, and that specific prophecy I showed you from Daniel was written approximately 200 years before the events:"Though 'higher critics' of the Bible have called in question the historicalness of Daniel's book, archaeological finds over the years have completely routed their assertions. For example, these critics leveled scorn at Daniel's statement that Belshazzar was king in Babylon at the time that Nabonidus was reputed to be ruler. (Dan. 5:1) Archaeology has now established beyond question that Belshazzar was an actual person and that there was a dual rulership in Babylon for many years. For example, they have unearthed a tablet, dated in the twelfth year of Nabonidus, containing an oath made in the name of Nabonidus, the king, and Belshazzar, the king's son, thus showing that Belshazzar ranked with his father. This is also of interest in explaining why Belshazzar offered to make Daniel 'the third one in the kingdom' if he could interpret the handwriting on the wall. Nabonidus would be considered the first, Belshazzar the second, and Daniel came to be heralded as the third ruler. (Dan. 5:16, 29) One authority now says: 'Cuneiform allusions to Belshazzar have thrown so much light upon the role which he played that his place in history stands clearly revealed. There are many texts which indicate that Belshazzar almost equaled Nabonidus in position and prestige. Dual rulership during most of the last Neo-Babylonian reign is an established fact. Nabonidus exercised supreme authority from his court in Tema in Arabia, while Belshazzar acted as coregent in the homeland with Babylon as his center of influence. It is evident that Belshazzar was not a feeble viceroy; he was entrusted with 'the kingship.'"Source: All Scripture Is Inspired Of God And BeneficialThe Bible is Internally Consistent and has been the most Attacked book in HistoryIf the Quran was the most attacked book in history I would not change religions, because this would not nullify the thousands of manuscripts that show the Bible has been the same in almost 2,000 years, nor could I ignore the historical evidence that the Quran has not been as perfectly preserved as many claim. But despite being the most attacked book, it is also the most distributed. History shows God has been protecting the Bible, and thus I have no good reason to question God inspired all the 66 books of the Bible, each with evidence of canonicity, which you can learn about if you study the Book, "All Scripture Is Inspired Of God And Beneficial". The Bible and scienceThe Bible is in harmony with scientific facts. That birds evolved from dinosaurs is not a fact. It is a theory based on a few similarities between dinosaurs and birds. God could have chosen to make these animals with these similarities, but made the birds first, could He have not?Evidence of Jesus' miracles from Babylonian Talmud: http://www.facingthechallenge.org...I will once again await your response. Back to you, Con!