There is Probably no God (Aimed at Christian believer)

Claiming that everything that has a beginning of existence also must have a cause of its existence is an observation based on the confines of existence itself. Based on your assumption that the universe has a beginning, which I agree with under the expanding universe theory, it follows that there was a time before its beginning. There is no proof that the laws of cause and effect apply in this instance or that cause must happen before effect."There is no proof" is not a valid argument. You need to prove that what you said is true, as the burden of proof is always on the person making a claim, and the Pro is always the one making a claim, thus you have the burden of proof to prove it.However, no designer is needed to create the conditions we find so hospitable. Given the massive size of the universe with its billion of galaxies containing billions of stars orbited by many planets, the conditions needed for life as we know it were almost bound to occur. And given that our universe had a beginning, who is to say that a universe did not exist prior to the one we exist in, offering infinitely more possibilities for perfect life conditions? However, big objects,such as planets, tend to form into a round shape due to their large gravity.[1] Our Milky Way galaxy is a barred spiral galaxy, [2] not round, even though it is massive. This is against the laws of nature, and only an omnipotent being could force something that big into a spiral, right? As for your final argument, I have know idea how a God existing in one possible world would lead it to exist in all possible worlds.It must exist in all possible worlds, because all the worlds are formed at the start then split into many. [3] If there is a God in an universe, (which there can be, as I proved), then the God must have created the universe, and not that the splittig created a God. Thus, the universe created by a God MUST be the first one. Throughout history, humans have tended to label any unexplainable phenomena as "The work of God". Seeing as God has a very poor track record in explaining the nature of things better than science, further advancement in scientific research will begin to give God less and less credit for the grand design. Just because we can't explain something doesn't mean it is the work of God. That admittance of scientific defeat put Western Europe in the dark ages for one thousand years.Future science is still not known yet. No one knows the future of science. Thus, your claims about science in the future are baseless. As fo the dark ages, it is irrelevent to the existance of God, which is what we are debating right now. As we can not use this method to prove the existence of a God, this further supports my point that there is probably no God.Ill use an analogy: you cannot see the air, but you can see the results of the flowing air. (e.g. wind), you can say that air is nonexistant because you cannot see it. That is just like saying you cannot prove God because you cannot observe it. As for my billion sided die analogy, I was stressing that there is a tiny chance that there is a God, as there are an infinite number of other possibilities.However, this does not work as:1. You have no proof that the chances of a God existing is tiny, and you have to have proof because whoever made the claim has the burden of proof. 2. There are only two possibilities in this case:a) No Godb) A GodSources[1]http://www.scientificamerican.com...[2]http://en.wikipedia.org...[3]http://en.wikipedia.org...