Moral relativism

1"As to "morals" you asked and I will tell. As I have stated I do not believe in "morals" because ethics and morality are subjective to the best interests of that particular person." 2 "I never said it is "ok" in fact I said it is "despicable" what Hitler did, but that does not mean that it is wrong because there is no right or wrong." These 2 sentances that you have stated are toatal contridictions because in one you state that "I do not believe in morals." but then you state in your next sentance that you say that Hitler is "despicable" well that sounds like you have morals to me because because if there is a world with no right and wrong then why do you belive that Hitler was despicable oh, and what else did you say in our last debate that was being held, oh yes you said he was trynnacial, and he was genocidal. Well how do those play into yor life if you have no morals. Because clearly you have said that in the above sentance #1. despicable—Synonyms vile, mean, detestable Vile: wretchedly bad I hope you agree with the fallowing defanitions because they are directly from the dictionary. Obviously if you have said that Hitler is dispicable which means vile and vile means BAD. Then you do belive that Hitler is wrong because you said he was despicable. You have just contridicted yourself. Or maby you still dont belive that Hitler is wrong in killing 6 million jews but you have still admited it none the less. I hope anybody who is judging this compition realizes what my opponent has just said and I hope you realze that he has contridicted himself. YOU SAY "My personal idea is that the death penalty shouldn't be used for several reasons, among them being the lack of cost efficiency, the lack of the death penalty to deter murder, and the sometimes inaccuracy of the process resulting in the death of an innocent person. I personally see that as a bad thing; however, I don't assume that I know all." 1 So basically what you are saying is that you think the death penalty should be illigal because if someone were to die when they were innocent that would be BAD. Well, first of all you have contridicted yourself again by saying that "I PERSONALLY see that as a BAD thing. Because you say earlier that you have no morals well SEEING somthing as BAD. Is automatically saying that it has morals because BAD is a moral in its self. 2 Now here is another way you CONTRIDICTED your self you say that Hitler was not wrong in killing 6000000 jews. Hitler did not just kill them he tortured them. Now on your Public Profile you say that I am against the Death penalty. So this is what you are saying, that It was not wrong for Hitler to kill 600000 innocent Jews but it is wrong for us to kill people that have raped, killed, malested and on and on. 3 How can you even say the death penalty is wrong if you say you have no morals and if you have no morals then everything is ok for you to do because morals are of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes. PLEASE ANSWERE THE FALLOWING QUESTION IN YOUR NEXT ARGUMENT: Did you or did you not contridict yourself in the fallowing 2 statements. 1"As to "morals" you asked and I will tell. As I have stated I do not believe in "morals" because ethics and morality are subjective to the best interests of that particular person." 2 "I never said it is "ok" in fact I said it is "despicable" what Hitler did, but that does not mean that it is wrong because there is no right or wrong." Because first you say you have no morals and then you say that Hitler was "despicable" for what he did. Well if you have no morals and there is no such sa right and wrong to you then what does then how are you even calling Hitler despicable.