Germs in the blood is a secondary phase of the disease process.

Con has failed to respond in an appropriate manner to many of my statements. In round 2; for example - I clearly stated my case - Quote from Pro- "The reason that this experiment has failed is because the germs from the gut have thousands of different types, any of which can leak from the gut into the in blood causing a disease. Thus, the medical system assumes that it is just one particular germ that is causing the problem. Thus, when they try to replicate the germ from the host they get a different variety of germ the second time around. Thus, the medical system will try to justify this change and say that the germ has mutated into a different germ, while insisting that this is still the same germ as before but is just a mutation of it" Con didn't respond to this statement at all. This is because Con is trying to win the debate by using the tactic of avoidance. Con hopes that by avoiding certain weak aspects of the germ theory of disease that they can win the debate. Sorry Con. You can't win a debate by avoiding important issues. Con uses many devious tactics such as avoidance, distraction, diversion and red herrings to put me off track and divert me from analyzing the obvious weak points of the germ theory of disease. I have clearly identified one of many weaknesses in the germ theory of disease. The concept that only one particular germ is responsible for one particular disease is a big mistake which the medical fraternity tries to cover up constantly. Quote from Con- "These "leaky gut" theorists seem to avoid the scientists and go to the public with their "snake oil sales". My references completely negates this nonsense statement. I have included many scientific laboratory tests which prove that leaky gut syndrome is a real problem. http://www.mdpi.com... Quote from Con - "His real contribution to medicine was making medicine an "art" rather than "magic". He separated medicine from religion." Reply - Con doesn't realize that modern medicine has reverted back to a religious cult which worships the Luis Pasteur God of germ theory. Alas, the God of germ theory is a mere mortal and a fraud. Quote from Con - "Answer "quite often" Physicians often have a stool sample examined to aid in diagnosis. ( Do "leaky gut" proponents examine stools?) " Reply - I have been to dozens of doctors over the years and none have diagnosed leaky gut syndrome or checked my stools. If a doctor detects germs in the blood, they will naturally assume that these germs arrived from an external source and were not a part of the guts digestive system. Thus, germ theory is wrong, in that it assumes that germs come from external sources. By doing this, the medical fraternity avoids the obvious conclusion that bad diet is the cause of most disease. Thus, in doing this; the medical fraternity can blame external germs as being the cause of disease. The medical system will then try to kill the germs which they assume will solve the problem. But, alas, the problem will persist because it is the leaky gut which is allowing the gut bacteria to constantly enter the blood supply. Thus, I have proven my case that germs in the blood are a secondary phase of the disease process.