Jesus is Michael the Archangel

Final Rebuttal of One Point: As per the rules, I will only counter one of pros prevous statements.Con Point 5 - Angels cannnot Judge SatanIt took me a while to understand exactly what Cons line of argument was here. Observers, please read it before hand and make sure you understand his line of argument. Con begins by explaining that Pro has deflected "away from the point" but then does not provide evidence to back it up where or what I am defelecting away from. I used the lexicon to prove the definition of "railing accustations," yet Con says this is proving nothing?"Jude introduced this event to stress the dangerous indecency of speaking evil or speaking disdainfully of exalted angels in God’s hierarchy of creation, let alone of God Himself."Yes. That is why Michael did not bring slanderous accusations against Satan."Michael is one of God’s archangels, yet Satan (Lucifer) had once been the highest of all, as the anointed cherub over God’s throne (Ezekiel 28:14). So even though Satan had fallen from heaven, he was still treated with great respect by Michael when contending with him. "Pro maintains that Michael is the (archo) “first” messenger of heaven. It should be noted that the word first is singular and exclusive. It is impossible to have more than one “first” of anything. [1] First is used in the context of preeminence rather than chronology therefore we know that Michael is the first or greatest messenger and prince. Therefore, Gabriel, Lucifer or any other angel could not be an archangel because that would be linguisticaly impossible. Moreover, Con has not yet proved that Micheal is not Jesus in this rebuttal. Pro has dismantled Cons earlier reasonings, and it now appears there is now nothing sound Con can bring to the argument."(As a parrellel for this type of behavior in the human realm, recall how David acted when Saul tried to kill him; David knew he could never lay a hand on, or bring any kind of accusation against Saul, God's anointed (2 Samuel 24:6;2 Samuel 24:12)."With this lovely comparison, Con has still not proved that Jesus cannot be Michael the Archangel in Jude 9, whilst my reasonings that he can be still stand."Thus, "Railing accusation" is not meant to be compared against a rebuke, for he clearly does, in the same passage. Rather it is identified as a word usuage meant to stress the heart of the matter, and also, shed light on the heiarchy of heaven. Finally, recall that the Lord Jesus, unlike Michael, is over Satan, and thus, a rebuke is able to cary his title.[Jude 9;John 8:44]"I agree with all of that. How does that disprove me at all? He has still not shown how Michael is not Jesus, whilst my arguments that he can be still stand.Conclusion: Cons arguments are based on a narrow understanding of what an angel is that limits an angel to a heavenly creature. Pro has repeatedly demonstrated that the word Angel means messenger and can be applied in a broad sense to anyone who carries a message including God. Pro agrees that heavenly creatures called angels are distinct and a lower in rank to God/Jesus, cannot be worshipped, will not rule the new Earth, and cannot judge. Pro maintains that Michael is not a heavenly created being, a point that Con has failed to disprove. Pro maintains that Michael is the (archo) “first” messenger of heaven. This is singular and exclusive. It is impossible to have more than one “first” of anything. First is used in the context of preeminence rather than chronology [1] therefore we know that Michael is the first or greatest messenger and prince. As there cannot be more than one “greatest” messenger and “greatest” prince, Con by making Michael a created being has made him a creature that is greater messenger and prince than Christ. To prove that Michael cannot be Christ Con must demonstrate how Michael can be the greatest messenger and prince and yet not be as great as Christ. If Con could prove that Michael is a created being he could claim that Michael is the greatest messenger of all created beings. Con has not been able to prove that Michael is a created being.In the Bible it is seen that God repetedly accepts worship in the form of an angel. Once an angel calls themselves the "I AM." (Exodus 3.) Whislt these do not prove Jesus is Michael, they prove Jesus can be an angel. In Joshua 5 it is logical to conclude that Jesus is before Joshua, in the form of the leader of the army of heaven. In Revelation 12 we see that to be Michael. In John 5:28 it is revealed that the voice that Christ decends with is his own, and in 1 Thessalonians 4:16 we see that Christ decends witht the voice of the archangel Jesus is Michael.Those who will vote, please consider the logic followed by the arguments unbiasedly as you make your decision.[1] http://www.biblestudytools.com...;