Failed Nations are a bigger threat to the United States than Stable Nations

I would first like to say 2 things: 1. Thank you for debating 2. I agree with your definition My rebuttle: 1. How exactly it is a threat to not spread the "democracy?" Not only that, but China is a much bigger threat to the U.S.'s spread of democracy. Many stable nations are the same. Failed Nations can do nothing but sit and "say" they wont be democratic. Nations such as China have a STRONG influence in getting nations to choose Communism over Democracy. With that being said, I dont see how ANY failed nations can be a bigger threat to the United States. 2. Obviously Terrorism is a threat. But we need to look at the effects this has, and compare it to my contentions. Obviously this terroristic attack had damages. But the United States was able to recover from this attack, and has since created a stronger security in witch will protect them from this in the future. An environemtnal threat and a financial threat would weaken the economy to a point in witch we would have an economic crisis that the United States would be unable to recover from. Those 3000 people dying would not compare as a threat to an economic crisis in witch could easily harm the United States. With that and a stronger security against Terrorist attacks, I dont exactly understand how that would cause a bigger threat. Not only that, but it was ONE terrorist attack. Nothing since that has happened, in witch we should not consider it as a big threat. 3. I see no harm in legal immigration. These people come here legally and have every right to live here. a) The threat of immigration is not a threat. Immigrants COME to the United States. Because these immigrants CHOOSE to come to the United States, and the United States allows them too, this is not a threat. Not only that, but the government does not have to financially pay for these people. I would also argue that these people come here to get money and jobs. They can EASILY become succesful and not be in poverty. b) As stated above, these immigrants can EASILY become succesful and not be in poverty. Crime can be caused by American Citizens. I am positive that theoir are more crimes due to AMERICANS than Immigrants. I would also argue that tourism FUNDS the United States. And because tourism FUNDS the United States, their is no harm in this. We need to look at the effects of something occuring. I have PROVEN that the effects of an environemtnal or financial threat would be WAY more catastrophic that any terrorist threat. I would also like to point out the fact that my opponent used no evidence in his case. Because of that, I dont see how his points are even relevant. Responce to opponents rebuttle: 1. This environmentla threat is HUGE. Because of Carbon Dioxide emiisions and such, the environemtn is being easily polluted BY STABLE NATIONS. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. Many forms of cancer are CAUSED by the Enviorneent. 1 in 4 people will die due to cardiovascular dieseases. Again, that disease can be CAUSED by the United States. 24% of diseases are caused by the environment and can easily be prevented. Their is PROOF that the environemtnal degradation hurts the United States both directly and indirectly. Because it effects us BOTH ways, these stable nations are a huge threat. 1a. I have stated above many ways the environmental threat stable nations pose is a HUGE threat. 1b. Russia has a stable government, a stable economy. Every single nation houses illegal activity. If you consider that a Failed Nation, then their would be no stable nations. The point of that is I dont want to debate if Russia is stable or unstable. I believe it is a STABLE nation. We can let the voters decide that. 2. The fact of the matter is not stocks. It is how stable Nations such as china pose a huge financial threat because of the debt we owe them. 2a. Even if we are taxing such imports, it clearly does not give the United States enough money to pay back the debt. 2b. You need to look at the EVIDENCE I have shown you through that contention. Just because you dont think China does, doesnt mean they dont. I have PROVEN THROUGH EVIDENCE that China does own 800.5 billion dollars of the United States Treasury. You fail to bring up any evidence against that, or any of my contentions for that matter. I will be looking forward to your arguements against these points.