BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Is it important that your beliefs be true

Yes belief is important because GOD created us and didnt let us live here with no guide, since he is the only one who knows us more than any one and care for us and most merciful to us than any one any thing he tells us to do or not to do is going to be for our benefit, he didnt leave us with out a guide so people in this world dictate for us what is right and what is wrong which is mostly for their own favor, e.g in islam: No alchol, no fornication or premarital sex, no interest ect , tell me which one of these isnt bad for us? And what benefit GOD would get if we followed his guide? He own the entire universe! Why islam? And not christianity or judaism First the same GOD is the source for these three religions but Because the guide been sent to these groups( jew and christian) been changed alot, the jew say we are the chosen people why GOD would ever specify his religion to specific group and actually he critisize them for that ((5:18) But the Jews and the Christians say, "We are the children of Allah and His beloved." Say, "Then why does He punish you for your sins?" Rather, you are human beings from among those He has created. He forgives whom He wills, and He punishes whom He wills. And to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and whatever is between them, and to Him is the [final] destination), The bible changed many time to sell it and gain money we have Roman catholic bible, king james, RSV, another RSV, then new world translation and GOD say about that (Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:"This is from Allah," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby), two third of the new testment written by paul who never met jesus in person and used to kill his followers suddenlly he said i saw jesus in vision and told me to preach and his teaching contradicts that of jesus, the thing that constantly blow my mind is that there is nothing written by jesus and when you ask christians they say he had limited time then i ask them he couldnt write a line or a page, offcourse in quran GOD mentioned that he gave jesus the Gospel but where is it today? No one knows, i think if we have it its gonna contradict the entire bible. Why islam? Is for all nations not arabs alnoe, its a guide to all human kind, the quran preserved in two ways ( GOD promised to preserve it he mentioned this in quran) so preserved by written and memorization if the entire religous books thrown in the ocean today i gurranty you no one book will come back except quran in a matter of one day the entire quran will come back word by word why? Because majority of muslims memorize it cover to cover some of them even if dont speak arabic they memorize it if i read a verse wrongly i will easily find a child who is 6 or 7 years old correct me.
A conclusion to the art of communication

To clarify monotone abuse. Now, this is not to be tone deaf as many are. This is to fall behind an apathetic tone in one's voice. I have even heard David Attenborough doing this when he speaks within scientific intricate jargon. So if wisdom is to have the ability to have a structured conversation with the village idiot and accepting that tomorrow it's my turn to be the village idiot. Explaining complexities in the simplest manner is just like nuts and bolts. The hardest part is knowing how to put it all back together. What would you say to that? If you read or even listen to audio books how well can you read a none or fictional storybook for your own children as to make it as genuinely real as possible? As to in capture there minds within the actual moment of the adventure. This ability is just like an artist within a picture or a musician's to harmonise. Just as our own language is if broken down is explanatory as an example assume, to assume makes an a#s (of) u (and) me. Sometimes I believe that the structural evolution of language was created as to harmonise and many people as the likes of scientists are missing or abuse its true nature and hide behind monotones. But a salesman does the opposite and utilise within a harmonic natural speech pattern as to make the sale. To much honey in my tummy makes me feel funny. Would you trust a salesman selling snake oil that speaks with a forked tongue? For this is what I see within many scientists as the limb that they choose to go out upon weakens and almost at a breaking point change there own tune in their voice pattern and a tone that wasn't there now is. As to blow smoke up one a#s. I also believe that to be apathetic is also within this same spectrum within one's own individual cognitive drives mindset and I fell that this is the cause and effect of why many scientists chose to lean towards atheism. As I hear it in there own descriptive failures within the harmonics of expression. As to Emphasize. Emphasis. Empathy within expression. is it deliberate or unintentional or as to be unaware of one's own self as the well-balanced individual would be aware of this. Is something just missing or not; passion, frustration and anger. Where is apathetic? Hiding behind the anger and frustration for passion within expression, falls away real fast doesn't it?
A conclusion to the art of communication

Hi. Emphasize. Emphasis. Empathy? Haven't debated on debate.org for a long time so I thought I would give it a whirl once again. I will be honest and say that I haven't really got a clue as to what you are driving at. Consequently I'm also unclear as to what I should be driving at . What are you for and what am I against? Nonetheless, looks like this might make for a fun, wordy debate. Hopefully I will be able to derive some clarity from your next submission. Peace be with you too.
A conclusion to the art of communication

Emphasize is the best indicator if you are speaking with a genuinely wise intelligent well-balanced individual These so-called highly intelligent scientists lack this ability just listen to there own lack of ability to emphasize within expression there own speech pattern. When these sort of people express within the act of communication there own brain gets in there own way it's called monotone abuse it's like a note is in their ability to sing is just not there. Unlike the way that some salesperson speak it sounds like its just too good to be true. Like so much honey in my tummy makes me feel funny. Peace be with you.
A conclusion to the art of communication

Ah. I see him now, more clearly. Standing quietly in the shade of his own tree. Humming contentedly. He won't bend to the will of your glorious mythical chant. Those seeds of deception were scattered about him. But were withered by the parched hum of reason. Are not the sociopath and his acolytes actually singing your sweet song? Try. To cut back the overgrowth of tradition. And rest for a while, in reflection of past innocence. And Infant purity. The dense seeding of that infant consciousness. The crashing cymbals of god and heaven. Deafened the subtle murmur of reason and judgement. Does that chorus of speculation, actually resound with words of wisdom? So. In short conclusion, my valid justification. May fall upon deaf ears and wither under your enduring canopy. But that monotone hum. Has sown a seed, and that ensuing discordance may cause dismay. If your sweet song and that contented hum will not join in harmony. Where lies the insanity? Let him hum his hum, sing your solo song once again and peace will be with you.
A conclusion to the art of communication

Are the people of the world ready for an apology from atheists and the sociopaths and psychopaths that rule with a big stick from the top of the tree of monkeys or the tower of Babel? I have been throwing pebbles at the glass house as not to smash my own. Is it too much to ask for a world without so much despair as to not find a better word? It's there in my mind but it is trapped somewhere down deep as to protect myself as yes this monotone abuse is within us all as some exercise this disposition and make it strong and others bury it way down deep as to be less so apathetic and create noble traits of empathy, sympathy and humility as to become well-balanced individuals as the seesaw of insanity and sanity. Peace be with you and thank you for the wisdom that you have shared as it's all just second-hand knowledge anyway. It's all been said before and no one owns it as to pass on the baton the gauntlet or even for the bride to toss the bouquet of flowers over the shoulder. The tongue is as a double-edged sword it cuts both ways. Practising; Empathy, Humility, Sympathy and Cooperation throughout life, create's an understanding of the surroundings that we are subjected to, doing this teaches us to talk to each other, so we can speak with each other and not at each other.
A conclusion to the art of communication

He's there again, right in the middle. He's buried up to his waist and your throwing stones at him. Did his hum annoy that much? I've been hopping across rocks trying to come to terms with all this and now I've hopped right back to where I started from. I think that, it wasn't really the hum that annoyed so much. I think that, it was the tune he was humming. Tone and verbiage can easily be ignored. But that depressing hum was drilling deep into the core of that metamorphic seam of knowledge. The sublime melody and harmony of your tune, might just as easily elicit an adverse response. What woe, that your siren song should fall upon such deaf ears. Better to dwell in the bliss of your own elysian song and let him meditate in the satisfaction of his monotone hum. Just keep whistling your tune and let him hum his.
A conclusion to the art of communication

So you have gone against at the start and now you come to a compromise with "How does Pro view the concepts of Individual ability, individual choice and individual freedom of expression?" Do I have to repeat myself does Polly want a cracker or does Polly need a cracker? Yes, crackers salted or unsalted? I say to you this; Are these monotone abuses aware or unaware of this subconsciously or not? I believe that rationalise reasoning within the cognitive mindset determines one's own conclusion within one's own personal concept of your ability to comprehend. So is this individual as to be as sheep and is freedom to be ignorant because of arrogance with monotone apathetic trends that fails one's self to be a well-balanced individual that uses the skill of articulation instead of hiding behind a big front of noise or the jargonised great wall of text that only another apathetic monotone scientist would or could understand. It's just like the lack of expression of ones and zeros that logic not rational reasoning. So you say TYPE Take Your Pick Everyone. But mean what you say and say what you mean if of course you can or are able to or even capital to begin with? as long as it comes from the heart. But sometimes we need to be cruel to be kind and don't forget the golden rule. So in short monotone abuses mindset can't comprehend as well as an articulate mindset. Because of apathy being there own disposition. To put up with a little noise is easier than to not. as it will soon become the whole lot of noise.
A conclusion to the art of communication

What actually underlies Pro's argument? With such an abstract presentation, one has to attempt to decipher the encoded personal message and this will inevitably present as an ad hominem response in my own argument. Does not Pro's argument itself, also boil down to personal criticism. Or am I still confused? Or does Pro simply view this debate as a literary challenge. Is that their hidden agenda? Initially, with their brief references to scientists and atheism I assumed Pro was leading me off down that well trodden debate track. If this is, simply about Pro's personal grievance with "monotone abuse". I would consider that the assertions I made in Round 2 were an adequate opening counter to that simple proposition. How does Pro view the concepts of Individual ability, individual choice and individual freedom of expression? Let us try again, shall we?
A conclusion to the art of communication

Is that the best you have as to shout the messenger with another ad hominem with; I would suggest that the notion of "monotone abuse" is being used here as nothing more than a personally derived criticism, aimed at something that for some reason doesn't sit easy within Pro's mind. Even what you have written is full of an inability to converse constructively within a structured text. with; 1/ easy could have been easily. 2/ personally, derived criticism is no more than a personal attack upon the messenger. 3/ aimed at something that for some reason doesn't sit easy within Pro's mind is also an attack upon the sanity of the messenger. How is it that you can do this are you also; Is something just missing or not; passion, frustration and anger. Where is apathetic? Hiding behind the anger and frustration for passion within expression, falls away real fast doesn't it? You have automatically become defensive within your own rational reasoning of your own cognitive drive that seems to have sidetracked you as to not even considered to answer any of the questions that I have put forward. All you have done is attacked my own character and exposed your own flawed logic. 1/ So if wisdom is to have the ability to have a structured conversation with the village idiot and accepting that tomorrow it's my turn to be the village idiot. Explaining complexities in the simplest manner is just like nuts and bolts. The hardest part is knowing how to put it all back together. What would you say to that? 2/ Would you trust a salesman selling snake oil that speaks with a forked tongue? 3/ Is something just missing or not; passion, frustration and anger. Where is apathetic? Hiding behind the anger and frustration for passion within expression, falls away real fast doesn't it? 4/ Let us try this again, shall we?
A conclusion to the art of communication

Am I detecting a not very well hidden agenda here? The nuances of speech may be innate in some and readily acquired by others. But the art of vocal expression is not every ones cup of tea. We concentrate our minds on a wide variety of interests and vocations. These interests and vocations do not have to include, the skill of articulation. Let story tellers tell stories, let singers sing and let scientists study, observe and experiment. Most of all let people behave as individuals and be allowed to express themselves as they see fit. I would suggest that the notion of "monotone abuse" is being used here as nothing more than a personally derived criticism, aimed at something that for some reason doesn't sit easy within Pro's mind.
This debate will not be interesting.

1) Interesting–adjective 1. engaging or exciting and holding the attention or curiosity (dictionary.com) 2) You can try. Given your reputation I'm sure you'll do a good job. I can't prove that you won't until the end, but I have a nagging suspicion that what goes on in this forum will be uninteresting to not only myself, and you but the general public as well. 3) I insist it will be uninteresting because I have every intention to make it so. That's my position as Pro. Its also to prove a point, which will not be revealed until the end. 4) It would not suggest interest, only coincidence. The mouse might have slipped and clicked on this debate, or perhaps the voter is blindly looking through debates and voting just so they can say they did, or if they do look at the debate it will not be because of the debate itself but of who is debating it therefore making the debate uninteresting. This explains both wy they might look at it and still posses no level of interest. 5) That proof can only be given once the debate is done. Its also possible you will lose interest and not attend to your rebuttals. 6) Istarted the debate because I am bored, plain and simple. I don't have an interest in it anymore than a disgrunteled fast food employee does of their job. I'll still return to this debate and provide my responces, but it won't mean I have interest, only dedication. Believe it or not, dedication and interest are not the same. Interest implies want, dedicate implies need. One doesn't need the other to survive. Theres your points, now mine. 1) This depends on your response to 1 2) In what way do you intend to make this debate interesting? Can you make it so not only I and you but the future reader will be grasped by this like a sudden explosion? 3) WHy do you think this debate is interesting if at all? be honest. 4) What is the standard to measure interest in people you've never seen in your life? 5) This will depend on the end of the debate 6) Can you prove that I am interested in this debate I strted. If not can you make me?
This debate will not be interesting.

CROSS-EXAMINATION: 1) First, would you please define "interesting?" Depending on your definition, I may possibly agree with it. 2) What evidence do you have to suggest that I won't be able to make this debate interesting? Surely there is a general argument in mind, no? 3) You say you don't think this debate will be interesting, but why do you insist this? 4) If 5 people were to look at this topic, wouldn't that suggest that they possessed at least SOME level of interest in it? If they didn't possess any level of interest, why would they bother looking at it? 5) Can you prove that absolutely no one will be interested in this debate? Surely you don't just MERELY intend to provide objections to my arguments. 6) Considering that YOU started this debate, why wouldn't that suggest that you were interested in it? That's all the questions I have.
This debate will not be interesting.

Vote however you want. I think that because of my bad responce in round 4 this should easily go to Con. I'm not really debating this to win, but to prove a point to myself and any others who think that point is valid, so in truth, I really am not interested in the debate at all, but only in the outcome. 1 last thing: 1) That was a typo, my mistake. EDIT: Clearly, this debate does not have a hold over my attention or has carried my curiosity. So I go back to what I said in round 4 and will save the rest of this round for after the debate is over, however, my opponent is right in saying that you should not take that responce into consideration as it goes beyond the real debate.
Stimming Shouldn't be Stopped.

As cuttingedgepediatrictherapy.com states, "The short answer to “Should I stop my child from stimming?” is no. You don’t want to stop it, as long as they’re not harming themselves or another person. These behaviors are calming to the kids. You can, however, limit the stimming in some circumstances." The only time this should be stopped, is when it is harming themselves, of people around them, flapping, yelling, and throwing tantrums.
Stimming Shouldn't be Stopped.

Stimming is defined as, "Self-stimulatory behavior, also known as stimming and self-stimulation, is the repetition of physical movements, sounds, or repetitive movement of objects common in individuals with developmental disabilities, but most prevalent in autistic people/people with autism spectrum disorders."For the sake of this argument we are excluding self harmful stims, such as head banging.I am arguing that stimming should not be discouraged, or stopped.You are arguing that it should be discouraged and stopped.
Stimming Shouldn't be Stopped.

When a person has a stim, it doesn't mean that they neccesarily have autism. We cannot stop stimming, as every one has a stim! Taken from https://childmind.org...;"I play with my hair while chatting with a friend. Maybe you bite your nails when you’re nervous or bored. You may tap your fingers or pencil on a desk while you’re thinking. I once knew someone who chewed on sticks of cinnamon bark, and I’ve noticed some who move their eyes in an unusual way. I can recognize certain people from far away just by their distinctive movements. We all know someone who has an annoying stim like cracking their knuckles every 5 minutes or repeating a phrase over and over; or a socially unacceptable stim such as nose-picking or biting oneself."I sometimes crack my knuckles when I am bored and bite my nails when I am nervous, so don't blame me for partially defending stims.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The stims that should be stopped are the harmul ones. However, rocking and flapping stims should be prevented, but not completely stopped.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk...;People stimming can also go through strange-looking physical movements, for instance making faces, stamping, assuming postures that look contorted and uncomfortable from the outside, shaking the head or shrugging the shoulders, and flapping – that is, rapidly shaking or pumping the arms. All in all, stimming can look very peculiar to people who don’t understand it. Strangers can find it frightening, but in fact the explanation for it is really quite simple: stimming is doing something repetitive for the sensation it creates rather than the result it produces – and that sensation is one that your son or daughter finds pleasing. sorry if this was too long, it would be more helpful if there were a few more rounds.
Stimming Shouldn't be Stopped.

Flapping is entirely non harmful in anyway as far as I can tell. I hate it when meltdowns are described as tantrums, as it is not misbehaviour.It is the same thing as a panic attack, but pain driven rather than anxiety driven.https://www.understood.org...During a meltdown stimming shouldn't be stopped. The reason for this is because stopping a calming behavior like rocking, flapping or spinning could cause the meltdown to last longer and they would have a harder time regulating themselves out of it. Not stimming when you need to is stressful. https://kirstenlindsmith.wordpress.com...Stopping stimming is often also associated with abuse that many (Especially nonverbal) autistics go through.https://juststimming.wordpress.com...
China will overtake America by 2050

China has nothing to gain from taking us over. They are an export country with us being the main buyer. Without us paying them, they couldn't pay their own debts and it continues on until we don't get out money. This causes a global economic collapse which means pretty much every country is not looking good. If you look at China, they need us. China is the only country of this size that doesn't have an ally. They somewhat have one in Russia, but that isn't strong enough to promise support. China not only needs us as the only close to being allies along with economic structure. As I have said, China depends on us importing goods. No one else buys as much as we do. The majority of things in China come from exporting surplus. If they stopped trading, they would fail. Plus, their Communist. No communist country lasts very long as a higher up power.
China will overtake America by 2050

First, I will take on the military overtake. I will point out major cons in china's defense. 1. No navy This one is self explaining. They stand as no threat to our navy. 2. To spread out the majority of their military is handling internal problems. A lot of their military would have to stay in China. 3. Low technology our weapons are far better than theirs. Economy China relies on exporting to keep their economy running. We are their biggest buyer. If we stopped buying from them, their entire economy would crumble.
the pope is not infallible

Pro is attempting to alter the resolution. The resolution reads 'The Pope is not infallible', not 'the Pope is not incapable of being infallible'. Pro has to prove that the Pope is, at the very moment of observing the Pope and deducing this, not infallible. Unfortunately, by the time you do this, the Pope WAS infallible but no longer IS infallible. Next time, don't make such a one-sided resolution, Pro because sometimes it's not as one-sided in favor of your side as you think but rather the opposing one.