Libertarian (Pro) vs Conservativism (Con)

I am putting forth the notion that the Libertarian principles are, when compared to Conservatism, provides a much more unique, better, and consistent perspective in the political arena today. Libertarianism, like Conservatism, stresses the importance of our Constitution, individual rights, private property ownership rights, free market economy, small limited government that's purpose is to protect those rights, enforce legal contractual agreements, provide the country a military for defense, as well as very few other functions. Libertarianism believes that the government's job is to protect our individual rights, not suspend them in times of crisis or danger. A libertarian should feel free to pursue whatever his heart desires, as long as he is not hurting, threatening, forcing, defrauding, deceiving, misleading, or misrepresenting to another person. The government should have minimal interference in the economy and our personal lives, they are not there to protect us from ourselves, or to be our mommy and daddy. There is a point that conservatives veer off the path, whereas libertarians continue on with the same principles. I will now talk about how conservative ideals differ greatly from libertarian once they start wandering off the path of our shared principles mentioned earlier. Conservatives begin to selectively adhering to specific certain parts of the Constitution, while ignoring or twisting it to their beliefs. They support a drug war which has been going on since Nixon was president, and has cost billions of dollars each year. The war on drugs violates individual rights, states rights, it's unconstitutional. They are against free trade, specifically with China. They believe in military interventionism to further our "imperialistic interests" in other sovereign nations that do not pose a threat to our national security, but our unwanted presence only serves to put our soldier's lives in danger (over 66,000 injured or dead in Iraq and Afghanistan) as well as stir up hostility toward the USA with the radicals in the area, tarnishing our worldwide reputation by making unilateral decisions to go to war, an excess of $6 trillion debt is everything we have to show for our military campaigns overseas. All of these, require a big government to sustain. So conservatives, like liberals, don't really want to shrink gov'ts size like libertarians. Our belief in economic and individual liberty disappears when conservatives talk about immigration. The conservative does not object to coercion or arbitrary power, as long as they are used for what HE regards as the right thing. They are less concerned with HOW the gov't wields its power and more concerned with WHO's wielding it. Libertarian's are NOT anarchists, we believe gov'ts primary job is to protect its citizens, not run their lives. We believe that instead of imposing liberty with force, liberty can be spread through trade. Conservatives want to legislate virtues and morality through law, libertarians believe the gov't is not an appropriate place to do this, rather they should be promoted at home within family. Gov't legislating virtues and morality can set a dangerous precedent by hand-picking virtues chosen at the whim of the ruling party rather than rely on the self-evident truths in the Constitution. Virtue is a highly arbitrary concept and will always be subjective, plus conservatives will only allow the possibility that ONLY their virtues be adopted as opposed to being free to adopt your own.