My Application Form is good enough to make me pass the test to join IDS.

Mr. president, You should reconsider your decision because my strength is over my weakness for joining IDS. I already give you very creative measures to win WUDC although I had no activities in IDS in the 1st semester. If you permit my joining IDS, you can take more useful measures from me. I quote my vision from 1 round. 'First, fast-reading : I can read the scripts in the 'Friends(USA soap opera)' 16 times faster than original speed. I carried 13 books from Seoul to Chungju to prepare seminar in 'the pupil of daybreak'(That is another debate club in Kyunghee University. But it is not a English debate club. Although IDS members don't need this explanation but online debaters need this.). Second, fast-listening. We can record and check practicing debate by using voice recorder and digital camera. And we can manipulate the play speed faster and faster to the unlimited playing speed. Third, fast-writing : By using shorthand program, we can practice debate in many online debate sites like www.debate.org more than our opponents. By using these measures, I certain we can listen our opponents' arguments like slow motion and we can take the advantage in the debate contest. Because our speaking can contain more contents. Our speaking can show more passion. Finally, Our speaking can give us win.' If I can give you these useful measures although I had no activities in IDS, I can give you more useful measures by using my creative mind when I am a member of IDS. Then, I'll give you my refutation against your arguments. 1st, I had not 'failed' to properly fill out the form. I had left the name, phone number and Date of Birth on purpose. As I told you in 'member comments', not only you and IDS members can see my application form, and many other unknown people can see my application form. I can give you completed document when you request me by using mail or other measures.(Not you, Lexicaholic. I'll give real IDS president my application form.) But, in this case, it is obvious to my good sense because I know what is the proper situation to reveal my crucial information or not. 2nd, you can even judge my English language skills by watching my debates in www.debate.org. http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... And, even if I assume I have not enough English language skills, I already gave you 'Speed-reading', 'Speed-listening', and 'Speed-writing'. Shorthand programs for helping 'Speed writing' and PowerDVD for watching more than 2 times faster than original speed are already existed. But, I found out new ways of using these things. It is the EVIDENCE TO PROVE MY CREATIVITY. And, THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH. I already give you very creative measures to win WUDC based on reasonable principles. That means if current IDS members use my ideas, you can surpass 'Native speakers' because you have UPPER MEANS THAN 'NATIVE SPEAKERS'. But, if you take other applicants because 'They have more English language skills than you', DO THEY REALLY CAN HELP YOU TO SURPASS NATIVE SPEAKERS? NO. THERE ENGLISH LEVEL HAVE NO EVIDENCE TO SURPASS NATIVE SPEAKERS BECAUSE NATIVE SPEAKERS CAN ALWAYS HAVE ADVANTAGE RELATED TO 'STUDYING ENGLISH' FROM THEIR LANGUAGE ENVIORNMENT. 3rd, If I want to win debate, I need more 'Reading' books that contain evidence, and more 'Watching' Debate Videos that contain same things. That means 'Reading' and 'Listening' is the common thing to prepare 'online debate' and 'IDS debate'. And the difference is the one is using 'Speaking', and the other is using 'Writing'. But, if you want to speak, you should recall 'texts' in your brain. And if you can write something, you can tell same thing because you already have 'contents' for giving other people. And, IDS members are very busy so you cannot practice debate often and regularly.(Please see my information in round 1) By using online debate, you can practice more than before. And I already give you alternative how we can practice 'verbal exchanges' in 'member comments.'. 4th, 'win-loss ratio' is just partial standard to measure my level. For example, if you use the standard, you should admit 'brian_eggleston(158 debates, 89 wins, 62 lost, win ratio : 58.94%)' have lower debate level than 'Rumsy(4 debate 4 wins, win ratio 100%). And as I remembered, 'Logical-Master(current 1st ranker in this site)' have The time when he did more than 100 debates but his win-loss ratio' was approximately 20%. So, The proper standard is the 'Percentile'. Although 'percentile' also shows my weak position in www.debate.org. But, can your members surpass my level in www.debate.org? I cannot win 4 debates because I forfeit some rounds in the debates basically. Your members cannot even practice your own debate often and regularly.(see round 1.) I took the information from one of your members. And doing 14 debates need to spend will, skill and time. That is the reason I take the highest percentile between Korean members in the site. And you should remember other applicants are Koreans, Kyunghee university students. I am the only Korean who can have most possibility to take the highest position in the site. The members in www.debate.org also have the ability to take your win in debates. You should not underestimate them.(quote : we are university students and we are more skillful than various online debaters. I guess online debate sites cannot be suitable place for training debate.) 5nd, The characters in "Friends" use quirky phrases and expressions that can mislead an English language student. I accepted the reason so I admitted 'Friends' is inappropriate material for developing English language skills. But I already gave you other reason 'Friend' is appropriate material for developing English language skills. There is no difference I found 'Speed reading and Speed listening' by using 'Friends' or 'Debate video'. It is important that I found the useful way to study English by using 'Friends'. And why the characters in 'Friends' use quirky phrases and expressions? You should remember the language is the means for delivering 'some contents'. In the situation of 'Friends', 'quirkly phrases and expressions' is the useful delivery measures. And I can recall some USA people cannot easily accept single mother by watching 'Friends' because I saw Ross's parents tell Ross and Rachel they lied their friends that 'Ross and Rachel married each other'. It is the example of process of learning USA cultures. And, I should tell 'Thank you' because you show me useful information of the site that can help my reviewing tenses and forms. But, You didn't point out anything what the part is wrong. That means you gave no evidence for supporting your argument. In summary, I gave you 'Speed studying' means. I gave you my 'English-debate experiences' that your members have not but have great worth. I gave you training place that you did not have. Because of these reasons, I told you I have very creative and sincere heart for IDS, and I ask you should reconsider your decision.