Everything is Interconnected

Ugh... So sorry for forfeiting, been so busy with work and friends; haven't had any time for debates. I do hope that this can still be a good debate.IntroductionMy opponent, who is most likely a reductive physicalist, would have you believe that physical objects are real. Here is a philosophically rigorous definition of reality that we can use to see if physical objects really measure up to reality: "existence that is absolute, self-sufficient, or objective, and not subject to human decisions or conventions." [1]Absolute, self-sufficient, and objective all mean unconditional: that which is real must always be, and must not depend on any circumstance. Before I go into something as audacious as a disproof of all physical objects, I would like to explain in further detail what interconnectedness is. Because all things are interconnected, any one thing depends on everything else. For example, one requirement for the universe to be in its present state is that I am here typing. If I weren't here typing, the entire universe would be in a different state. Interconnectedness is clearly visible throughout the biosphere: all life depends on the biosphere (or the totality of life) in order to exist. A very simple example is that flowers need to be pollinated in order to reproduce. Bees need to pollinate flowers in order to make the honey that provides a food source for the colony. If a flower is pollinated by bees and only bees, then that flower depends on bees for its existence. Since bees need to pollinate flowers for honey, they depend on flowers for their existence. The point is that bees and flowers are not separate entities (as two isolated objects could be) but they are one entity. They're a flower-bee complex. You can't have one without the other, they are interconnected.The claim "Everything is Interconnected" simply means that you can't have anything without everything. Because everything is possible, reality exists. At the same rate, everything is temporary, so nothing is "real" in the philosophical sense. The only thing that is real is reality itself, which could also be described as infinite possibility. Anything is just part of a state: it is not a thing, it is part of a state. What is a state? A configuration of possibility. Nothing is real, because everything is part of a configuration of possibility. To prove this, we will have to look at matter to see if it has any kind of substance, or if all particles are just configurations of possibility. The Quantum ArgumentWhat is a physical object, really?We know that atoms aren't fundamental, they are made of smaller pieces still. They're made of electrons and nucleons. What are electrons and nucleons made of? They're made of quarks. Protons, for example, are a configuration of two up quarks and one down quark. Because a proton is a configuration of quarks, it is known as a hadron. Interestingly enough, quarks are only observed as part of hadrons (i.e. they have no separate existence). [2] [3]What does this mean? It suggests that anything smaller than a hadron has no real substance, and that hadrons pop into and out of existence as different configurations of possibility. In other words, a hadron is not an object, but an interaction. According to the double slit experiment, quantum phenomena are indeterminate, or probabilistic in nature. Photons are only absorbed as discrete particles by a solid surface, but while they are radiating, they interfere with each other. This means that quantum "objects" are in an indeterminate "quantum state" that is broken when the object interacts with an outside force, causing it to have an actual state, rather than a bundle of possible states. [4]What is an actual state, then? When two sets of possibility, or quantum states, interact with each other, the state of actuality that arises is the state in which the two possible states just so happen to interact in that instance. That which is observed depends on time and nature of the observation. Again, actuality is just a configuration of possibility. Only actions/states, which are configurations of possibility, are real. Argument from entropy"The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases, because isolated systems always evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, a state with maximum entropy." [5]Any object could be thought of as an isolated thermodynamic system. All matter is just stored, condensed energy. That's why scientists don't call it the law of conservation of Mass or the law of conservation of Energy, they call it the law of conservation of Mass/Energy. This is to say that all objects, according to the second law of thermodynamics, are doomed to be annihilated. They are energy with form, and form tends to change. That's what this debate is all about. What is thermodynamic equilibrium?Thermodynamic equilibrium is the most statistically probable thermodynamic state for an isolated system. In thermodynamic equilibrium, energy is spread out, rather than clumped together. In such a state, very few actions can be made, because it is virtually impossible for a system to go from a highly probable state to a highly improbable state. Think of thermodynamic equilibrium as nothingness, a state without individuality. Unless space itself contracts, heat death is the most likely end of the universe. Heat death is a state of thermodynamic equilibrium for the entire universe. Think of it as a point when all mass/energy becomes indistinguishable from the space it inhabits. There would be no energy, no density, nothing.Big Bang Theory "The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the early development of the universe The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. Moreover, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe." [6] Our best scientists are telling us that the universe begun with a single, infinitely dense, hot point, and that space is expanding, with mass-energy expanding into space. The More Spacetime (future), less mass-energy. Less Spacetime (past), more mass-energy.ConclusionAnything within the universe can be said to be a configuration of possibility within a larger one. The entire universe is merely a transition from instability (a single point) to stability (flat, infinite space). Since the entire universe is one mechanism in transition, it's safe to say that all things are interconnected, or that any thing is merely an integral part of the complete, overarching process of the Universe.[1]: Definition of Reality https://www.google.com... reality[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org...[3]: http://en.wikipedia.org...[4]: http://en.wikipedia.org...[5]: http://en.wikipedia.org...[6]: http://en.wikipedia.org...;