AIS intersex people prove that God does not condemn gay marriage

To begin, I strongly object to my opponent attempting to retroactively define his definition of 'God'. He did not specifically define 'God' in his opening arguments, and to do so now is unfair. If he wanted to define the definition of 'God', he should have done so when he started this debate instead of when he saw my argument. Even if we do accept his definition of 'God' as the Christian God, any reasonable definition of the Christian God would note the laws, commandments and precedents of Jewish law - which basically every Christian would agree God established for Israel during the Old Testament era.My opponent has attempted to refute my argument that the existence of AIS individuals does not show God approves of gay marriage, in the same manner that the existence of those born without limbs does not show God approves of your cutting you right arm off, or that the existence of the black widow spider does not show God approves of spousal cannibalism. He actually fails pretty poorly in doing this on every point:*First, he argues the three have nothing to do with each other. This is a dumb argument, given he is arguing a pre-existing condition (AIS) justifies an act (gay marriage). The two examples I noted are similar and use this exact same logic - being born without a right arm is a pre-existing condition that naturally occurs, so why doesn't it justify you lopping off your right arm? Black widow spiders naturally exist, so why doesn't this justify killing and eating your husband? He cannot refute this point because the resolution of this debate lends to these sorts of justifications.*Second, he argues that cutting off your right arm would be a choice and God doesn't approve of all choices. Well, getting a gay marriage is a choice too! Are all gay people obligated to get married? Do gay people not have a choice on whether or not to get married?*Third, he argues killing your spouse would be wrong because religious law forbids murder. Well, religious law also forbids homosexuality and gay marriage![1][2][3] You can't have it both ways here: how does the existence of AIS individuals demonstrate God's approval of gay marriage (despite the ban of it in religious law) any more than the existence of those born without limbs demonstrates God's approval of self-mutilation (despite the ban of it in religious law) or the existence of the black widow spider demonstrates God's approval of spousal murder (despite the ban of it in religious law)? The obvious answer here, of course, is that it simply does not.In his second part of his rebuttal, my opponent doesn't actually rebut anything - he just rants about how unjust religious laws against gay marriage are to intersex people. He does not contest the existence of religious exemptions for disabled or unable individuals, and that such exemptions could exist for intersex individuals - he even quotes it! But then, he acts like my entire arguments revolves around them remaining celibate - despite the fact that he had just quoted where I argued these individuals might be exempt from religious law on marriage! Celibacy is simply one argument you could make, as is arguing the non-existence of God. More confusingly, my opponent argues that God's law never changes and that God is just. If God's law never changes, we have the following logical progressions:*God's law never changes.*God's law bans homosexual sex and gay marriage.*Therefore, God's laws on homosexual marriage and gay marriage will never change.*God is just.*God's law bans homosexual sex and gay marriage.*Therefore, God's laws on homosexual sex and gay marriage are just.My opponent is insisting this debate is predicated on the existence of the Christian God, and also specifically proves from Christian scripture that this God's law is eternal and is just. My opponent has just disproven his own argument: a just God making eternal laws would make just eternal laws. No just God would lie to his own people about his laws, so we can establish that God is telling the truth regarding homosexual sex and gay marriage. Ergo, God does not approve of gay marriage, his ban on it is just, and the existence of AIS intersex individuals do absolutely nothing to change that. By his own hand, my opponent has been defeated.The fact is, my opponent's main argument has been utterly and completely refuted - in no way does the existence of AIS intersex individuals prove God's.References:1. https://en.wikipedia.org...2. https://en.wikipedia.org...3. http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...