It is unjust to prove or disprove someone's religion.

(Disclaimer: It's okay to challenge other people's religion to respectively share and learn ideals with one another. The thing I'm talking about is people who rudely diminishes other people's religion and try so hard to prove that their beliefs are "better" than everyone else's. There is no such thing as religion better than the other. Unless if it's a ridiculous belief like if Unicorns created the universe or something. But, even then, we don't know. Ridiculous or not, we don't know. Religion is for us to figure out. Plus, this time I will take this debate seriously because, really, this debate needs to be discussed for the people. Even though I suck at debate and I suck at Literacy, I will try my best to stay on topic and be unbiased.) I hope Con and I will treat each other with respect. We will not belittle each other's religious beliefs and we won't belittle other's. The point of this debate is to not flame each other. Let's begin. Reasons why it's completely unnecessary to discourteously challenge other religions to prove/disprove them: #1: It's their opinion and beliefs It's their religion. So, what ever they believe in, that was their choice to believe in that belief. It's not your business or concern of what religion other people believe in. Okay, the bible states that you should transcend the Christian beliefs to other people. I understand. I understand it if you're doing it in a way that doesn't show you're subsiding them. I will transcend the Christ way, but I will only do it to those who don't know what to believe in and in a respectful way. But, just because it's your opinion doesn't mean you should go out and belittle their opinions. That's not an opinion. That's just disparage. #2: It starts so much controversy I don't just mean controversy as like people just gather around in a group and argue back and forth. No, not just that controversy. WAR controversy too. Yes, Religion can start a bunch of mess worldwide. Part of the reason why there is an Al-Qaeda is because of Religion. The Al-Qaeda is a religious motivated group even though they have some political goals. Fighting over religion causes most of the world's problems. - http://www.majorreligions.com... (" It is manifested in greater religious piety and community feeling, and in a growing adoption of Islamic culture: dress, terminology, separation of the sexes, and values by Muslims. The Islamist movement, or Islamism, is a set of ideologies holding that Islam is not only a religion, but also a political system; therefore, modern Muslims must return to their roots of their religion, and unite politically.") - http://www.theguardian.com... ("Yet it's true, religion has been a major feature in some historical conflicts and the most recent wave of modern terrorism." "Religion has been implicated in all sorts of conflict and violence throughout human history.") *This source isn't that much of a source because it is more of a forum, but these people sound like they know what they're talking about. So, I don't care if you take this as a source or not because I'll still have plenty of sources.* - http://www.bethinking.org... ("So, does religion cause war? Sadly, it does. But does Jesus Christ, and do those who submit themselves wholeheartedly to Him and His teaching? No.") - http://www.beyondintractability.org... ("All of these instances derive from a lack of respect for other faiths.") #3: No evidence as to why I'm not saying this to diminish everyone's beliefs. It sickens me when people try to disprove Christianity or some other religion and then they have no proof as to why think that way. Sure, other religions have no proof, but it's RELIGION. Religion is a series of BELIEFS. Meaning, it's OPINIONATED. Sure, the bible said this and the bible said that, but you can't use your own religion as proof to disprove other beliefs that has nothing to do with yours. That's inapplicable. For instance, this Christian guy *(Remember: I'm a Christian too. I have nothing against Christianity. The only thing that I'm against is how they force you to believe in what they want you to believe in. This is the 50% reason why I wanted to start this debate. Now, Christianity in a PHYSCHOLOGICAL standpoint makes sense. But, in my opinion, when it tries to be physical, it doesn't make sense. For instance, supernatural activity like walking on water. That's kind of unrealistic because if Jesus could walk on water. Shouldn't we or something else be able to walk on water too? I know that Jesus is God's son and if he's God's son, then he should have some powers or something, but still. All of these supernatural activities that you see in the bible doesn't happen now. I do believe in some miracles like healings, but I don't believe Jesus walked on water even though I do believe in Jesus himself.)* is walking around and some Hindu started talking about his beliefs for some reason. Then the Christian comes out and says, "That's stupid. The bible said this. The bible said that." I mean, using your own religious beliefs to disprove others is so irrelevant. That's being biased. How does he know if all of that is true? He has no idea if what he just said was true or not. He has no clue. Religion is a big mystery. Everyone has different answers to this big mystery which goes into #4. #4. Everyone has their different interpretations of religion. 2 Christians can interpret very differently even though they believe in the same thing. I'm not the typical Christian who believes everything I see in bible. Again, not disparaging here. But, still, just because you believe in something and you think it makes sense doesn't mean the person next you should believe in that too. He/She can if he/she wants to, but forcing him/her to believe in yours is fallacious. What happened to the First Amendment? Freedom of Religion. Where's that at? I don't see it. That's all I have. I wish my opponent good luck and I hope I can do better with this debate than my previous ones. I'll say this one last time, the focus point of this debate is to share ideals and learn from them, not to derogate them. - http://en.wikipedia.org...