"The god of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction:..."

I am disappointed by the lack of intellectual challenge in your response; This is utter garbage, even a high school kid could garner a more substantiated response, you do not want to read nor research and think very highly of yourself, mistakenly obviously based on your writings; , how can this theory, it be a proven fact when amongst many things not a single indisputable multi-celled fossil has been found , it is called the theory of evolution for a reason, it is a theory , again this is irrelevant I will ignore your Donald Trump comments as they are irrelevant to this debate, also kidichard dawkins as by all accounts, is a prophet of the religion of atheism, its chief minister and missionary as such it is pointless for me to respond to your "celebrity" quotes that are irrelevant to the debate. I also see your responses seem more like mumblings, so I will continue with building my case. Since you claim that I got more characters in , I will make this brief, so as to be fair. I find your arguments to be a mask of bigotry and intolerance, you offer nothing of actual substance but you continually parrot the same claims of genocide and what not, you then to proceed to ignorantly claim that the theory of evolution, upon which Darwin famously said, " The eye to this day gives me a cold shudder." To think the eye had evolved by natural selection, Darwin said, "seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree." , so to have you parrot your propaganda here is immature. I do not want to debate the merits of your claims, as they are not fact and it is not the original debate. Why is it up to me to prove that God exists, what does that matter to me , I am only here to debate the premise you proposed, if he did not exist, then why did you propose this debate and even if you did it as a hypothetical exercise, what do I have to prove to you? I simply do not care, we are debating mercy and the good qualities of God in the old testament, not your infatuation with richad dokins It is foolish for you to tell me that I am the descendant of a theoretical ape or here by chance or magic and then expect me to believe you and have me to prove otherwise, will I really buy into this fantasy because you demand it?. I see you are a needlessly emotional person who is more interested in insults than actual debate and I do not wish to deal with your personal demons, you can do that on your own. either debate and show me the flaw in my reasoning by countering my arguments with new arguments , but regurgitate the same points, it is boring, stale and shows me that you have no knowledge and what you say is based what you feel in your heart. repeating it continually will not make it true. If you can call me evil because of a debate, then I truly pity you and cannot justify your self loath with a response and find that the purpose of this debate is pointless and you believe that you inflict harm on my personally by saying this, I would expect nothing less from a person who seems nothing more to himself than just flesh and blood, as such, I conclude that if you call me evil because I do not agree with you in a debate, then clearly you would call God evil because he does not agree with you in your mind , hence to you evil is a subjective term and that's why Richard darwin is your god, as he represents all good to you and anyone who contradicts him is evil. As such richrds's greatest enemy is clearly your greatest enemy. I have attempted to show my colleague that man has been brutal and killed more people than any other being in existence, this was to show that man exercises violence needlessly and at will , and my attempt was to show that God's intervention was an act of justice specific to the various conditions of men. What this one is doing, is dismissing my arguments and trying to make this about atheism, it is a kiddish ploy and disheartens any student of intellectual discourse.