The United States is too involved in Middle Eastern affairs

First of all im not trying to distract readers, I am using your own words to show that your logic is flawed to try to prove my point. For example,You define Democracy as: "A Democracy is not a form of government, but a way for society to function without a rule of law because a democracy is a system where people have a mutual responsibility to their neighbors and accept the task of being part of a society."But every credible source of information defines Democracy as something far different:"a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority" - Merriam Webster" a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system." - Dictionary.com"Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives." - Thefreedictionary.comYour definition of Democracy is wrong because nowhere is Democracy an ideal nor is it a system where people accept mutual responsibility for people of distant and rightfully independent nations. Since Democracy does not call for the US implementing democracy overseas that nullifies a rather large part of your argument. Democracy is just a form of government it is no ideal society we are trying to work for to achieve." it is the responsibility of the PEOPLE in a democratic nation to pursue the rights of all humanity which will ultimately define and secure their own right and the way to do this is use the body which the people have created to deal with matters at that level, the government."According to YOU it is the responsibility to do this, but every other credible source that knows what Democracy is disagrees. There is no trade off like you suggest here where people get their own rights if they help other people outside their borders from getting these same rights first. It is also not the right of the government to go around annexing countries just to install their idea of Democracy on sovereign countries. "Another point where you make a distraction is the fact of why we chose the middle east rather than other parts of the world to be involved in. That is extreme nonsense to say that we are ONLY being involved in the middle east. We are very involved in world affairs for the reasons i laid out above, but the middle east is a much more volatile region in the world and have housed militant groups which have sworn to destroy the principles which the american society was founded on"I also never said the US was only involved in the Middle East, you put those words in my mouth when I did not say that.You also havent shown any other world affairs the US is involved in at all. Militant groups in the Middle East dont hate our "American principles" they hate our foreign policy regarding the Middle East, support for Israel, etc. Osama said that himself in his ultimatum following 9/11http://www.guardian.co.uk...http://ebtx.com...http://servingthekingstea.blogspot.com..."If a society recognizes that every person in their species is born with certain qualities, rights, then it is the duty of that society to protect those rights because failure to do so contradict the values that that society holds so dear."There is a great deal of difference between society and species. lets look at the definition of society now," companionship or association with one's fellows" - Merriam Webster"an organized group of persons associated together for religious, benevolent, cultural, scientific, political, patriotic, or other purposes." - Dictionary.com" A group of humans broadly distinguished from other groups by mutual interests, participation in characteristic relationships, shared institutions, and a common culture" - The free dictionarySocieties are different, independent, categories of the organized peoples of the human race and no one society has authority to implement their ideals over all the other societies that make up the Human race like the Con believes. The US does not have the inherit right to go around and implement democracy in any form they please.The US is too involved in the Middle East, and the reasons that the Con has offered to justify such extensive intervention is illogical because his definitions of society, democracy, the powers of the US government, and the sovereignty of foreign nations are flawed. The US does not own the ultimate authority to implement their own ideas of society over independent nations, that concept is called imperialism and it is not a justifiable reason for why the US is so involved in Middle Eastern affairs...By the way what is a stawman?