Abortion should be illegal

You seem to have difficulty understanding what you have read as it explain how you repeatedly make the same mistakes. Your comments about common law marriage was in response to a question I posed earlier, " So would you consider a man and women who have been in a monogamist relationship for years, Hedonist, Just because they occasionally have sex? ". You may note that nowhere in that statement does it say anything about the couple living together. Now the reason I responded to your statements about common law marriage was point out that it was wrong, And it may come as a shock to you but many adults now a days are in perfectly normal long term monogamous relationships who do not feel the need to either live together or get married. In cases such as those the state cannot classify them as married, Not even common law marriage. So for the third time, You are wrong on this mater. Another area where you failed to grasp the point was on the issue of viability. The reason I posted that was so that you would understand that the underling legal issue was with the viability and not a time constraint in terms of trimesters which you keep referring to, This is why late term abortions in the last trimester are allowed when the fetus/baby is no longer viable. You also pointed out that abortions should be illegal when a fetus looks more anatomically human, This would also contradict the Supreme Court's decision. Thank you for posting that brief summery of Roe Vs Wade, As it lends to my argument as to why abortions should be legal and are. You seem to have a knack for (figuratively) punching yourself in the face and continuing on as if nothing has happened. You keep stating that the definition of hedonism is "my" definition as if it was one I came up with based on something I came up with. You are wrong, It is not my definition, It is the accepted definition used in sociology which intern is the study of the development, Structure, And functioning of human society. Just a quick tip, You probably shouldn't make up a definition based on your readings from a religious book or tablet, When you are attempting to question the legality of a United States Supreme Court Case. As you may know the U. S. Government (Congress) is not allowed to make any law (or criminalize something) based on any religious establishment. So your argument that abortions should be illegal because it would lead to "hedonism" as defined by you according to the bible, Would be promptly thrown out of court. Since you do seem fond of using religious scripture in legal arguments you might want to read Genesis 2:7, Where it states that humans come to life when they take their first breath of air, "Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and [breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, And the man became a living being]. Based on this one could say that until a baby breathes outside the womb it is not considered living, But I would rather not use religion and instead base my arguments on established law and facts. Lastly as to the title of the debate, Those four word which you yourself chose "Abortion Should be Illegal" are very clear and straight forward, You used no ambiguity there or in your opening statement. That is why I take issue, If it were me I would have said "Abortions After the First Trimester Should be Illegal", And then in my opening statement listed all the caveats where I thought it was acceptable, Before talking about the issue with hedonism. Sure it would have meant a few more words but I think it would be well worth the effort for a clear and honest debate. So you can either admit this or press on, It does not mater anymore as it seems everyone else sees through your flawed debate tactics.