Bryan Mullins: The New Idea Called "Electocracy" Vs. Democracy

Here is my conclusion. Electocracy is the new political belief of electing an actually well experienced person, instead of someone really popular, or someone very inexperienced. Electocracy is the new political belief of an election based not on opinion, but on fact. Electocracy is the new political belief in no political party to divide us, nor bring us together. But, to make things clear, bias should not be in anyway, the influence on hpwho and how we elect somebody we choose. Electocracy is the idea of no senate or house chamber, nor any politicians republican or democrat. For example, only real military experts lead our country into or out of war. Comparing that to Democracy:Democracy is only voting based on bias, no experience, and popularity. Democracy is only flawed when people disagree with other people. Democracy only depends on opinion and debate to determine war or not, if necessary. Democracy is wrong, Electocracy is right. 1. "Democracy allows individuals to evaluate all parts of a President Elect before deciding on who to vote for. In the case of an Electocracy, you are basing whether you should vote for a certain President Elect purely on their experience which is extremely flawed decision making. What if the President Elect in question is an extreme conservative who won"t pass any laws? The public won"t be allowed to know this as that information would make their voting decision biased. In an Electocracy, many Presidents will be elected as long as they have more experience than anyone else even if they have terrible decision making skills and a complete lack of intelligence. "It is not flawed that we must choose a president based on experience, logic, and perseverance. The public will, of course, be able to know the clear difference between an experienced, logical candidate; And, an inexperienced, illogical, foolish candidate. Electocracy is not for the election of multiple presidents, it is only the election of one president. You misrepresented Electocracy. Democracy is the election of a president of either an inexperienced, illogical, and foolish candidate; Or, A celebrity, for example, Oprah Winfrey. Electocracy also allows evaluation of candidates, and intellectual debates and conventions, but the clear difference is the result of the victory of one candidate to become a presumptive nominee is not based on bias, opinion, and influence. Democracy has many flaws, Staying undetermined of what the elected president will do for the country, instead of allowing an experienced person to be elected.2. "As talent beats experiance in many, if not most cases, basing a vote purely on experience is completely flawed. "This argument is flawed, because it is saying that all experienced people have no intelligent, or credible (which is false). Also, you are misrepresenting Electocracy by saying that people who will properly lead our country should not be elected, which would cause this nation to collapse by lack of leadership. That is your main argument. Here is the definition of Electocracy:"An electocracy is a political system where citizens are able to vote for their government but cannot participate directly in governmental decision making and where the government does not share any power. In contrast to democracy where citizens are able to participate in the making of decisions that affect them, electocracy sees decision-making limited to an elected individual or group who may then govern in an arbitrary and unaccountable manner until the next election. " [1] Source: . https://en.m.wikipedia.org...Since