God is immoral and evil.

I thank Con for his response, although his logical contradiction fails as I will show below.All Powerful / All Knowing & His ChoiceWe can now accept from the above round that we have agreed that God is all powerful, and all knowing.Thus, He knew the outcome of all of his actions before doing them, could have done them any other way, and would know those outcomes too.So from that we can say he chose this world, that is full of evil, suffering and bad things, over any other outcome possible. It was possibe for him to make a world with less suffering, for he is all powerful, but he did not. So at the very least, he chose a world outcome with rape, slavery, violence, hatred, discrimination, starvation, infection, disease, lies and evil.If God is omnibenevolant as you say, this means he would want to be universally benevolant towards all of his creations. Surely he has failed in this if the above is true. He also goes against this apparent characteristic when he orders geneocide against entire cities, including wiping out children and babies. This is not something that can be dodged with the 'free will' argument, since this is on Gods own command.Good and EvilCon asserts that "God is defined as omnibenevolent, and is all good by definition."Con also asserts that Being "Good" and "Evil" is logically contradictory.There is a few points to cover on this as it was Cons main argument, so I will break this into a few seperate points.OmnibenevolantFirstly, Con states that God is Omnibenevolant. However, The Bible makes no mention of "Omnibenevolance", at best he is asuming that the Christian God is omnibenevolant. This needs backed up.I would argue that there is overwhelming biblical evidence, from geneocide, to slavery, to killing innoscents, to the eternal torture of children, that would suggest, at least sometimes God does not act in a benevolant mannar towards every person. If he does not always act in a benevolant mannar, then he is not omnibenevolant.Good and Evil ContradictionAt best the bible asserts that God is "Good" and sees that his creations are good. If we go to Genisis, he saw that man, specifically, was good. Since we have agreed that he is all knowing, he knew exactly what man would do, what sins man would commit, and what evils man would accomplish. Yet he still saw that man was good. This shows that God himself saw man as Good, yet knew man would be Evil. If this is how God sees good, then good is certainly not omnibenevolance, or absolutely morally right, either. So from this we can say that at best, it is good in Gods opinion.If we are talking about good as an opinion, then what is good to one, may not be good to another. God can be evil, and see things he does as good just in the same way that I'm sure hitler saw the invasion of Poland and thought it was Good. This doesn't mean Hitler was not evil. God is not bound by omnibenevolance, and we have shown the Bible itself gives examples of "good" things that create evil. Thus, there is no logical contradiction in being both good and evil.DefinitionsCon aserts that God must be omnibenevolent by definition. We have shown above that God cannot be omnibenevolant. This points the logical contradiction not to God being evil, but to the christian God being a God by definition at all. If we say that a God must be omnibenevolant, and we have shown quite clearly that the Christian God is not omnibenevolant, then the logical outcome is that th christin God is not a God by our definition and currant understanding.Either we are wrong in our definition, and omnibenevolance is not a characteristic of a God, which in turn voids Cons argument. Or, the Christian God is not a God by definition, and therefore does not meet the characteristics of a God, in which case we cannot asume him to be omnibenevolant through the sheer fact of being a God.Either one opens up the Christian God to being both Evil and Immoral withought breaking his own characteristics or being a logical contradiction.Fact Or FictionWhile maybe an obvios one, there is another asumption to Cons argument. Con assumes that God is not only a God by definition, but that God is real, existing and actual. I say this because otherwise, it would simply be a character flaw pointing to poor writing on the authors part.Since both these asumptions are unproven, The Christian God being evil can simply be put forward as either a poorly written God character, or that the author has simply used the word God as a name/title to project forward a notion of a powerful being withought sticking to the definition through out the piece.A Truthful GodI put to Con a question of Gods honesty. God Can't LieNumbers 23:19 - God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent.2 Samuel 7:28 - Thou art that God, and thy words be true. Psalm 119:160 - The word is true from the beginning.Hebrews 6:18 - It was impossible for God to lie.God Can Lie1 Kings 22:23 - Now, therefore, behold, the Lord hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets, and the Lord hath spoken evil concerning thee.2 Chronicles 18:22 - Now therefore, behold, the Lord hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets.Jeremiah 4:10 - Ah, Lord GOD! surely thou hast greatly deceived this people.Jeremiah 20:7 - O Lord, thou hast deceived me, and I was deceived.Ezekeil 14:9 - And if a prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the Lord have deceived that prophet.2 Thessalonians 2:11 - For this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie. From this we can clearly see that God can and has lied, and has lied about being able to lie. At the very least this brings into question his morallity and benevolance, at the hasher end of the scale, is grounds for questioning the entire bible.If God can lie, whats to say that he hasn't lied about being good? I put to Con that of all what we have gone over so far points not to an omnibenevolant God, but simply to an Evil God who has commited very immoral acts, allowed very evil things to happen, created this world knowing he would do this and that these things would happen, has the power to stop them but doesn't and simply lies to justify it all.ConclusionThe Christian God is all knowing and all powerful, but does nothing to stop the suffering he knows will happen. This goes against omnibenevolance.The Christian God does not meet the current definition for a God. He is either not a God, or Omnibenevolance is not a property of God and therefore there is nothing stopping God from being evil. Therefore there is no logical contradiction and Cons argument fails.If he orders mass killings, allows rape, murder, slavery and child torture, knows the evils of man long before he exer created man, but thinks man is good and he is shown to lie, this shows Gods immoral and Evil nature. To sum up, I have shown that God is evil.