There is No good evidence for evolution

1. Cosmic evolution: the origin of time, space, and matter from nothing in the "big bang". "According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics." http://www.big-bang-theory.com... "We don't know" = No good evidence. 2. Chemical evolution: all elements "evolved" from hydrogen. "In the beginning, hydrogen created the heavens and the earth." Harlow Shapley evolutionary astronomer and long-time head of the Harvard University Observatory. Thus we are left with hydrogen as the originator of everything else, even though we don't know how it did this. we don't know = No good evidence. "It's been said there are approximately two million different proteins in the human body. Clearly, nature would have had to randomly create ALL of them for Chemical Evolution to be true. But let's keep it simple and look at the odds that just ONE could have been formed by chance. Since proteins are made up of amino acids (amino acids are chemical compounds), and given that there are 20 amino acids in the human body, and assuming a given protein contains only 100 amino acids(the longest presently known is 26,926!)"the mathematical probability that a human protein could accidentally arise from random combinations of those 20 possible amino acids into a specific human protein is 1 chance in 20100, or well beyond 1 in 10100." http://www.religiouslyincorrect.com... Carl Sagan estimated this probability to be approximately 1 in 10130 (Carl Sagan, Encyclopaedia Britannica). Thus, even the formation of one, simple protein is so far beyond mathematical impossibility that anyone who seriously believes it happened is uniformed, deceived, or incapable of grasping the truth. There are approximately 2,000,000 currently discovered proteins in the human body. 3. There are NO stars forming in these pictures. These are two pictures of distant stars and some debris. How do you interpret stars forming from these pictures? This is terrible evidence for stars forming. This is like me taking a picture of a rock in the snow and saying "see, look! the rock is forming from the snow." This is just stupid. This next one better be good, so far I am not impressed" 4. You have conceded #4 ok"I guess it all hinges on #5 let's see here. 5. Macro-evolution My opponent has stated; "Triploid watermelons cannot reproduce because they have an extra copy of each chromosome. This is how we get seedless watermelons." becoming seedless is not a beneficial mutation. There are No beneficial mutations. the number of chromosomes (the threadlike bodies within cells that contain the inheritance units called genes) in a normal watermelon plant is doubled by the use of the chemical colchicine. The truth is that producing seedless watermelon is a very difficult and complex operation that contains many steps. This is horrible evidence for evolution. In Conclusion, I have stated that there is No good evidence for evolution and my Opponent has utterly failed to provide any good evidence to support the theory of evolution. "evolution" is a lie and a massive deception. For more information on the subject of creation vs evolution I recommend this series of videos presented by Kent Hovind. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com...