Christian morality (Pro) vs. Atheistic or Secular morality (Con)

Let me first point out that my opponent has violated the debate structure I set up using Round 2 which I explicitly stated was for arguments to refute what I’ve said in my argument. But I will address your claims. I do agree in the regard that the Bible explicitly forbids the act of homosexuality and I believe that homosexuality is wrong. I dislike the fact that many churches and professing Christians compromise the authority of the Bible for what society thinks is right. I don’t want this to turn into a debate on homosexuality so I won’t go into any more detail on the subject. If the entire human population in the world except for one family is wicked as the Bible states sinning against the same God that gave them life then God has the right to take it away with the flood. And if the pagan nations around the Israelites are committing horrendous crimes such as for example in Leviticus 18:21,24 “And you shall not let any of your descendants pass through the fire to Molech.... Do not defile yourselves with any of these things; for by all these the nations are defiled, which I am casting out before you.” Meaning that if they are literally burning their own children as sacrifices to false gods then God can rightfully allow the Israelites to drive out or destroy these pagan nations. Note that God doesn’t play favorites because when the Israelites themselves turn away from God, he kicks them from their own land. Also note that such instances are rare in the Old Testament. Again you saying that the Christian God is immoral based on your personal opinion. If your thoughts on morality are the result of nothing more than accidental collisions of atoms obeying the laws of chemistry then why should I or anyone else take your word for it? I never said that atheists couldn’t be moral. I just stated that atheists have no objective reason to be “good”. And like I said before, what is the point of being honest, donating to charity, or obeying laws if after death you end up in the same realm as a serial killer or a rapist unconscious and unaware of anything you have done while you lived. You claim that the amount of murders during the crusades, inquisition, etc. are proof that Christian morality is immoral but you are judging Christian morality under the assumption that murder is wrong as if it is absolute. In addition, it is important to note that a vast majority of wars and conflicts have nothing to do with Christianity. Wars having nothing to do with religion can fill the pages of a book whereas “Christian” wars can be counted with one hand. The number of deaths from regimes that ban religion such as North Korea and Cambodia under Pol Pot trump in the last 50 years easily trumps what Christians have done in the last 1000 years. Any atrocities committed by Christians are inconsistent with the Bible such as do not murder. If morality is subjective as you state it is and that there is no ultimate authority, then there is a slippery slope. Take for example the genocide the Nazis committed during WWII against the Jews. They were complying with the laws of Germany so in order to convict them of war crimes; there must be a standard for morality higher than the laws of any government. With Mao, Stalin, and Pol Pot I just stated that they were acting consistently with their belief in no God that there is no objective morality to adhere to then anything is permissible.