TH supports athletes making political and religious expressions at international sporting events.

Thanks for Rollinginmoney first to take this debate as a first time as well. we are going to call proposition side as a 'Government' ,cons side as a 'Opponent goverment' Before move on my argument , i rebut points of pro's . As my opponent says normal people speak out what they want in public space then why not athletes ? I don't think this 21th world there is limitation to speak out as a human right we recognised . If it is true what government expressed in concern somehow athletes right to speak out was infringed , there might no case that aggravated national relationship by one athletes saying in international sporting events. But as we can see , it happens quite often so that we can't agree with that athletes are limited to their right. I will make this point up as i started my point. Briefly i convey two assertion . 1.Athletes who participating in international event is stands for nation not only individual. 2.Since government don't suppress any right to speak out to athletes so if government start to make athletes to speak out their perspective of political and religious , we are not sure is that from their own perspective or fostered by government side and reversely infringe to their right to keep silent when they don't have any comment on it but third party keep asking to answer with fact that government support these things. First my argument athletes have a nation stance not only individual stance in international event. To help understand of point, lets say we are watching national football game between Portugal and Brazil.Then we easy to agree that Cristiano Ronaldo stands for Portugal and himself . We assume that after Portugal won the game and Ronaldo has a interview. What if Ronaldo says 'Once Brazil was colonised by the portuguese ,its reasonable result that we won the game today' . Even if that is not public opinion of Portugal , its obvious that his comment has a huge possibility to foster international conflict after that. What i assert is that public figure must have a responsibility what effect comes out later from their speech to their country. I am not limiting that personal right to speak. He can speak whatever he wants but its easy to be misinformed in the national event. Ronaldo never has a limitation using on Twitter , Facebook to express his own opinion . If there is more possibility to have miscommunicate not only from individually but also whole nation , its better not to mention their opinion in international event. Second ,Since government don't limit athletes to speak out ,if they start to make athletes speak their perspective of politics and religion , its going to make some problems. Firstly we are not sure is that from their own perspective or fostered by government side. As we were talking at my first argument , athletes speaking has a power to give meaning of nation stance. So probably government intervene in personal opinion to speak out by adding their own stance. Even though its obvious that different perspective existence from government side , athletes might take their opinion to avoid risk of his life .This one has more possibility to infringe personal right to speak. Secondly , If government start to make athletes to express their opinion on politics and religion , Its not easy to reject to do express their opinion event though they don't want since most of athletes does and audience expect some speech. Its also infringe right to keep silent on . In this reason , i think government better not to make athletes religious and political expression on international event.