Time Travel is (theoretically) and will eventually be possible

"Infinity divided by infinity is one. " False, and I can prove it by contradiction. 1. Infinity divided by infinity is one. 2. Infinity plus infinity equals infinity. (Strange but true. For example, the set of all even numbers is infinite, the set of all odd numbers is infinite, and the set of all integers (evens + odds) is infinite. ) infinity / infinity = 1 (infinity + infinity) / infinity = 1 (infinity / infinity) + (infinity / infinity) = 1 1 + 1 = 1 If infinity / infinity = 1, then 2 = 1. It does not. Theorem disproven. "Scientifically and Mathematically .000. .1 is impossible, but philosophically you would be able to interpret what it represents. " .000. .1 does not make any sense, mathematically or philosophically. .000. .1 is not possible, for the reasons I stated in round one. My explanation works whether we are talking about mathematics or philosophy. "If we took all of everything within time and divided it by two (6 months in a year, 2 weeks in a month, etc. ) then we would not be lost, we would survive. " That is because THAT IS NOT TIME. That is merely our representation of time. We have not changed time at all by changing how we measure it; it still passes in the exact same way. "This doesn't make sense. The "new" and "old" old universe? " The "new" old universe is the one we are creating by manipulating matter. The "old" old universe is the one in the past. "Who said anything about reversing? I am talking about rearranging. " It is impossible to make something look exactly as it did in the past because atomic decay cannot be reversed. "Because time can be taken away, as proven before. " Time cannot be "taken away". Time can be warped through near-lightspeed travel, but I don't that that that is what my opponent is referring to. "1. We actually have the technology which can look all the way down to the atom. " No we don't. See Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. (. http://en.wikipedia.org...) "2. Or use the person themselves that already have the right decay stage. " Let's say we want to push a person a year into the past. That person's atoms would have to have exactly one year's worth less of decay. Since atomic decay cannot be reversed, the person cannot return to the state of one year ago, and therefore cannot time travel. "There is actually no law of physics that prohibits time travel. " There is no law of physics that prohibits invisible pink unicorns the size of quarks from spontaneously appearing a thousand times per second, either. Laws of physics do not prohibit things. They allow things. Unless allowed, everything is prohibited. And no known law allows time travel. "If we were to launch through a worm hole, since a wormhole is a bend in time and space, we would be able to go through the bended time and space. " -If I were to go through a wormhole, I would not be time traveling since my atoms would not be returning to an earlier state. -I see no concrete evidence that wormholes exist. Sure, they have been postulated, but we've never seen one and the evidence for their existence isn't great. "Clocks in space stations above Earth have to be set a little bit faster, because as we move farther away from the Earths gravitational pull, clocks tend to be slower. " Due to relativity? Sorry, but special relativity is far too weak at that speed to have any effects, much less general relativity. "It is also actually said that if we didn't have a moon, then the earth would spin faster, therefore having our days spin faster too. " Days would go by faster, but time would not change at all. Days are only a method of measuring time, and do not correlate to actual time. "Actually, theoretically if we were to take two atomic clocks and put one on the ground and travel one at lightspeed, the one going lightspeed would be fairly slower than the one on the ground. " 1. It is impossible to move at lightspeed. 2. It would not be going fairly slower, it would be stopped. Of course, we can't forget about the twin paradox. (. http://en.wikipedia.org...) Physics has not provided us with any method of time travel. Philosophy is completely irrelevant, at least to my opponent's arguments. Mathematics has disproven some of my opponent's claims.