Science Cannot Explain Happiness

Well i hope this goes well. i will be arguing that happiness can not be explain through science, and science along. i want to break down the meaning or purpose of science that convince me of this thinking. science - systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation. Systematic knowledge is a knowledge that has a fix point. meaning if a take a stick and drop it from a certain height, gravity plus the mass of the stick will let it fall to the grown. And this will be true for other things with a mass. we have a fix knowledge, we should get the same result every time. Physical knowledge is something that we can see hear, touch, smell, taste, basically all of our human sense are involved. And finally experimentation we know that it rely on repeatable procedure and logical analysis of the results. i want to talk a little bit about statistic Canada. so far all study that are conducted to get some reading of happiness are all opinions base of survey done with random volunteers. this is the once major method of getting this data, as it is being use by statistic Canada. they came out with the conclusion that Canada is the fifth happiest place in the world. how by asking individual question related to job, school, price of products, and mostly how they feel about all of these things. one might conclude that is an actual scientific evidence of happiness. Remember scientific knowledge has to be a fix knowledge that is physically observable or materialistic. so i can argue that the data gather by statistic Canada is by far bias and not an accurate representation of happiness. why, because many things comes into play when considering what makes a person happy. the answer will vary depending on who you are asking, what time, what environment, what color are they being exposed to during this questions period. and so many other things are to be consider. and if that is not enough. happiness does make us to react certain ways, but the same reaction can also be mistaken for other emotions. for an example, when i see green it makes me feel happy. but you can not see this, it can not be seen. even my opinion may not be as accurate when describing how i really feel about the color green. i could be lacking in verbal communication, giving you a complete inaccurate reading of me emotions when asked. today i could be feeling already happy because i just got a car an hour later, when you ask me about the same green color, i will give you another answer, because our emotion is constantly changing. this is why a scientific evidence of human emotion is unreliable and will always prove wrong. One emotion is not a fix knowledge. today i can love a girl, the next day i can hate her, a few hours after that i can love her again, and i can also do the same at once, i can love her and hate her at the same time. same is true for happiness. happiness does not really produce material things other then a change in behaviors, happiness can only be notice base on the physical change of a person's face or actions. but the same can also be true for other emotions, like love, joy. as you can see too much happiness can even cause one to cry, an action usually associated with sadness and pain, or even that when missing someone or something. remember the mean purpose behind experimenting?