Straight marriage should be legal.

-First of all, Pro, I know what I'm saying and DO NOT put words into my mouth. That's disrespectful, rude and stupid. Really, I mean it. -There's no point in this debate if that's the way you interpret your topic. Your point is straight marriage is legal. The way you interpreted your topic into your believe at the end is misleading. And that causes your opponent to misinterpret what you want to debate about since you don't even know what you want to debate about in the first place. My point is fine, let straight marriage legal but if they're trying to create conflict with the homosexual community then that's a problem and I'm against it. I"m against it because most people look down on the minority homosexual community and I"m here to forbid it to happen. -You are arguing for straight marriage ONLY and ignoring the homosexual marriage. And I"m here to argue for the homosexual marriage and its legality. A partial of my point is straight marriages threaten and discriminate the homosexual marriages because they are doing something that was just "off" a little bit which is not ok. And your topic would be undebatable if you want me to argue that straight marriage should be LITERALLY illegal. I'm arguing the other way around and that is if straight marriages threaten a homosexual marriage then that"s ILLEGAL. Which mean straight marriage is illegal. Your topic somewhat indirectly mentioned that homosexual marriages aren"t legal. Your topic is "straight marriage should be legal" NOT "homosexual marriage should be legal." -And by the way your debate is pointless. You think that I would fall for your trap and debate that straight marriage shouldn't be illegal because a man and a woman shouldn't be together? You know for a fact that I"m not against that. I'm sorry your trick doesn't work. I know that I've signed up to be the Con but hey, why would you want to debate about straight marriage should be legal if nothing around you trying to forbid it from happening. (Open your eyes and look! Stop looking at a computer or a laptop or whatever electronic devices your eyes are looking at right now. Look at your parents, your grand parents, your great grand parents and great great grand parents and so on and ask yourself are you blind to what REALLY going or what?). I'm not arguing that a man and a woman shouldn't be together, my point is if that straight marriage couple, which is the majority, threaten the homosexual couple, the minority, then that's wrong and it should be illegal for that couple to get married. By the way, you should stop sounded like you have a rebuttal against me because you don"t even know what you"re rebutting about since you don"t know how to introduce a debate topic properly and then debate it correctly. I accepted this debate because I could see some stupidity in your argument. -And let me quote you one more time just to make sure you're on topic. "(1) it is natural for a man and woman to be together. From the beginning of civilization they have been wanting to be mutually connected or, in today's terms, married. 2. Deducting from genitalia and genitalia functions, one can see how a man and woman should be together as well. One would one be eliminating the obvious normal connection otherwise. And if it was illegal and looked down upon by society in the future, where would children come from? A man and woman would feel shamed for having intercourse and possibly a baby. So, in conclusion, I believe straight marriage should be legal." -Read it yourself and tell me is this debatable if you want me to do what you indirectly ask me to debate about. This is a whole pointless paragraph. It's undebatable (somewhat). You are arguing that marriages between a man and woman sounded like something is chasing after you and try to forbid it. Sounds ridiculous. I'm arguing against straight marriages ONLY if it created a threat to the minority homosexual community.