Theory of Everything

Con spent a considerable amount of time rebutting my theory, while hardly expanding and elaborating on his proposed String Theory. Con states that energy is the cause of the vibrating strings, but doesn't go on to explain why strings have different amounts of energy, or how this energy transfers from one string to another. In other words, Con does't provide an explanation for the overall flow of energy from string to string, nor what governs that flow. Con also fails do define energy, or explain how exactly energy causes motion. I don't believe that any system, string or particle-point, is a capable of having less than three dimensions. Perhaps in theory they can, but not in reality. I don't see how anything can take up three dimensional space without having three dimensions. If you can, please try to explain how this is possible. Yes, String Theory does embrace the four forces, in the sense that the strings abide by the forces, but does not explain why or how the forces influence the Universe. Con claims that it does, but never goes on to explain how. He just describes the four forces, and their carrier particles, without linking them to String Theory. Con states that there is no separation between space, matter, and force. I disagree. Just because these entities coexist, does not mean that there is no distinction between them. Our Universe is filled with matter and force, and therefore they coexist. My point is that space is its own entity, and deserves specific classification as such. That space is not the same as matter and force, but the realm in which they exist. I don't believe that gravitational fields create space, but exist within all of space. Perhaps gravitational force and space are codependent and created each other. Either way, that doesn't change the fact that space is its own definable entity, and a primary ingredient of the Universe. Con also claims that I failed to connect quantum and classical physics. I believe they are one in the same. The only reason physicists think they are different is that we don't yet have the tools to properly observe or predict the quantum scale. There are too many variables in play that we have not yet accounted for. But they all play by the same rules. They are all governed by the same force. It is our lack of prediction that has drawn the distinction between quantum and classical; and our lack of prediction is directly related to our inability to identify all of the variables. These variables are easy to account for in the macro, making the observable Universe much more predictable. I will now explain the Fundamental Force of Balance. I briefly explained earlier that all entities in the Universe are comprised of opposites. This is also known as duality. To learn more about the most commonly accepted scientific theories of duality, go to Wikipedia and search "duality". Below you will see a list of duality theories pertaining to Mathematics, Philosophy, Psychology, Physics, Electrical, and Mechanical. I believe that the most fundamental force in the Universe is balance. Balance is the inherent desire for all elements in the Universe to achieve an equilibrium. This is achieved by pairing opposites of equal force or magnitude. This inherent desire is the reason for all movement. The more movement we see, the more unbalanced the entity. A free electron exemplifies this phenomenon, violently bouncing from one atom to the next until it finds an atom with positive charge. An atom that is missing one electron. This is how we conduct electrical current and energy; sending a group of unbalanced electrons through a wire until they connect with a positive charge. This electrical current is nothing more than an unbalanced entity seeking balance. The entire Universe is made up of building blocks that scientists refer to as the periodic table of elements. The only difference between each object (e.g. plastic vs rubber) is the arrangement, or combination, of those various elements. The next obvious question would be, why do these elements arrange themselves in different ways to create different things? What causes different elements to be drawn to one another? The answer is balance. The elements are made of atoms. Atoms cling together because of a process called, ionic bonding. Essentially, this is the process of atoms balancing their electrons and protons. Example: If atom A has 3 protons and 1 electron, and atom B has 4 protons and 6 elections, they will cling together if they become close to one another. The reason they cling together is because as a whole (if you add the protons and electrons between A and B) you get atom "AB" with 7 protons and 7 elections. As a pair, they have achieved an atomic balance that was missing before they connected. They were driven by their desire to seek balance. This is a very simplified explanation of ionic bonding, but it suggests that the primary motivator between molecular arrangements is the desire for atoms to balance their protons and electrons. These atoms are dancing all around us at this very moment. They are searching for the dance partner that balances them. The partner that gives the couple an equal amount of electrons and protons (two opposite, yet equal forces). Even your explanation for the vibration of strings was a display of balance. "The harmonic motion of the string is caused by the inability of these two energy states to balance each other. Kinetic energy is translated into potential energy and potential energy back into kinetic energy. They never really reach equilibrium." So in other words, the strings have two states of energy (opposing states I will assume). And the strings are vibrating violently because these opposites are out of balance. In other words, assuming strings make up all things, everything is in motion because of an imbalance within them. I would agree with that. Unfortunately, I've ran out of words. I will continue with examples of balance in the next round.