A Perfect Being Cannot Exist

My Rebuttal1. A perfect being exists.2. The perfect being has free will.3. The perfect being creates outside of itself, the universe. Because the perfect being has free will, so does His creation. 4. The universe is perfect, and is made up of perfect parts. Just because men like Charles Manson exist, doesn't mean the universe is imperfect. It means the opposite, as God has free will, so must man. Just because there is a dead, cold, radiation filled vacuum of space, doesn't mean the creation is imperfect. On the contrary, they are perfect necessities to the creation. What defines perfect is subjective, where one sees imperfection, I see perfection, and can argue such. 5. Therefore because the Creator and the creation are both perfect, and the creation has perfect parts (including free will), they are both logically consistent with each other. Nowhere did Pro actually give a decent rebuttal. Nowhere did I equate Flava Flav or Charles Manson to God. In fact they are both distinct to God, even if they are in the same totality of existence.Where has Pro shown me how Charles Manson, or anything else for that matter, is imperfect? He hasn't. He has simply assumed that there are imperfections. That is what it came down to. As you can see by the above counter-formula, he would need to show me how such things are imperfect.How are men like Flava Flav and Charles Manson perfect parts of the perfect creation? That's easily answered. Free will. Both God and parts within creation have free will. Really, if you removed the free will from certain parts of the creation, only then would it be imperfect. Because God is perfect, has free will, therefore the creation must have the possibility of free will as well. So in all reality, they are perfect parts of a perfect creation. Just because certain individuals do not try to emulate the complete perfection of God, doesn't mean the are not perfect. How is a dead, cold, radiation filled vacuum of space perfect parts of the perfect creation? Again, this is easily answered. Ask just about any scientist about the beauty of the universe, of science, and they will tell you exactly how those things are perfect. They are perfect because they are necessities of creation. Those things are needed in order for the universe to function in the way it does, perfectly.How can feces and urine be considered to be perfect parts of the perfect creation? Take a moment to try and truly conceive of the idea that the creatures in our universe did not produce waste. Why does waste come about? Because we eat, we take nutrients from we eat, and we expel what is left. So take this away, and you take away eating and growing. This too is a perfect part of a perfect creation.Where did Pro go wrong? He seems to think that a part of creation can be equated to God. You can not compare a part of an entity to the whole of an entity. Let me show you the irrationality in this.When you go to the car dealership to buy a car, would you as the dealer to compare the tire of a car to the entirety of another? Of course not.When you speak about the Trinity, do you call the Holy Spirit God? No, the Holy Spirit, the Son, and the Father are what the Trinity is, are what God is within Christianity.The many parts of the creation within the creation are what makes the creation whole. When you compare God and the creation within the context of this debate, you can't compare one piece within the entity of creation to the whole entity of God. That's just silly.Also, he is greatly opinionated on what perfect is. I have throughly explained how something may not seem perfect, but in all reality, it is. Everything is perfect, everything has it's own place within the universe.ConclusionWhen you vote, remember my counter-formula. Remember that everything part of creation has its place, and can be deemed perfect. I have thoroughly answered Pro on every point, yet he only persisted in saying the same thing over and over again, and never addressed my explanations as to why the parts are indeed perfect parts of the perfect creation.