Codified Theistic and Spiritual Satanism does not exist.

Alright cool, line by line. "No, I said it does NOT exist. I am basically saying Theistic and Spiritual Satanists that have laws and rules do not exist. There is no set standard for what they can be Satan wise." >> Once again I argue that they have laws and rules, and weather they are written or not does not matter. "No, I said it does NOT exist. I am basically saying Theistic and Spiritual Satanists that have laws and rules do not exist. There is no set standard for what they can be Satan wise." >> Erm..... Well lets see. Evangelical Christians believe everyone who is not Christian worships the devil and is satanic. Therefor their code for this would be the bible. As such, some theistic satanists feel to promote evil is best and cite Satan in the bible. I have noticed a lot of people will use your own satanic bible and interpret it in different ways than you would. Diane Vera seems to have done quite a bit of work writing down Theistic Satanic ideas in some form or another. If you truely 100% need some form of a bible.... check out the demonic bible by Tsirk Susuj. It comes complete with codes to live by and rituals. You can pick one up at amazon.com here is the link http://www.amazon.com... "What I meant by Bible is a book that leads the religion (or maybe even a multiple of codified scripts). In any case it would be a Bible just set for a different religion with a different name." >> Once again I contest your idea, do we really need a bible or some written text to have a religion? You tell me that Greek and Roman philosophy don't exist, i'm not sure what you mean by that, but at some point you must agree with me that they did "exist" and did not have a corresponding religious text. Also you tell me that Jesus did have a bible? No he definitely didn't. The bible was made long long after Jesus' time. Jesus did not follow the old testament and the new testament BEGAN to be compiled about 50 years after Jesus' death. Finally while I am on this subject you tell me that Socrates was written down. Oh yeah he totally was, but not while he was alive. And you cannot possibly argue that he was unimportant while he was alive. He was sentenced to death because of his ideas. Both Jesus' and Socrates' ideas were important/valid before they became codified. "Exactly, which is why a codified Theistic Satanist cannot believe in anything because there is no codified version." >> First look back to my second point I made during this round. Secondly the problem with your idea here is the fact that it is already happening. They already believe in something. Whether it is codified in paper or in thought. Whether they follow the demonic bible or there own ideas. There is still a code which they live by. "No, they do not have to be. But to be codified, yes. Which is why they do not have any Bibles, Spiritual books, and written guidance anywhere." >>Uh..... Bibles.... spiritual books...... and written guidance. Please type in "theistic satanism" to google and tell me you can not find something written by someone. Furthermore I once again state something does not need to be written to be codified. I live by a code of my own morals, must I write them down for them to count? "No, they just were not set in stone. They were not implemented as of yet." >>Set in stone..... uh? Can I not change my opinion at any time? Does writting something down somehow set it in stone more than thinking it? Only difference I see is that in the former case your going to have to take a couple extra seconds to erase the old thought before you write a new one. "Ideas are not valid until they are practiced by either a many group of people who believe in that idea, or it is written down for a mass group of followers to follow." >>Look at Jesus again. "But then again, someone did write there ideas down. Funny how there ideas were not implemented or given thought until someone wrote them down ;)" >>Jesus didn't have his thoughts written down to after he was dead, obviously people gave him thought before that. Socrates was put to death before he had his ideas written down. He taught verbally. Obviously they thought highly enough of his ideas to put him to death. "No, but then again, there is no ounce of evidence that Theistic Satanism exists because in this day in age, people refer to books to be credible (anything can be written on the net). By seeing, for example, a Theistic Satanic Bible I would then accept it if I saw that this Bible made an impact somehow on a multiple of people who followed it delightly." >>I can find evidence of this everywhere. I can even pull up Wiki to find evidence on this. Then you tell me people refer to books to be credible and anything can be written on the net. Sweet, can't anything be written in a book? And I guarantee you more people read things on the net than they do in books now a days (Ebooks, check those out, sweet idea). Lastly I hand you the demonic bible, there is your evidence, be delighted! Oh and your own bible, sorry people interpret it in ways you do not like. Looking at the rest of your argument I feel I have amply covered it and going line by line any farther would just make for reiterations. I suppose you want a definition for codified though..... Thus I give you this one. "I think you don't know what Codified means. Codified: to reduce laws (rules, regulations, etc.) to a code. Codified: to arrange in a systematic collection." Great, point to me where in that definition it says that it must be written down, and one cannot follow a code within themselves. With that I offer you a second definition to clarify your first definition. Code: (n) Any system or collection of rules and regulations: a gentleman's code of behavior. Not the phrase "any system" in there. Unless the human mind does not somehow meet the requirements for being a system..........