The Accused is going to Hell (For Rejecting Catholic Dogma)

I will be arguing against the Roman Catholic Church as this is my oppponent's stance. I will show from the Scriptures ,which I do believe contains infallible historical data about the apostolic church or the age where the church has its Apostles alive, that the Roman Catholic church is not the true church recorded therein.Argument # 1: Church PolityThe Apostolic church (33- 90 C.E.) was never ruled by a single Bishop known as the "Pope".The church polity in first century Christianity was "multiple bishops" over autocephalous churches.The congregations were led by elders (Greek: presbeteros). These elders also act as "overseers" (Greek: episkopos or bishop). This is evident is the Acts of the Apostles which gives an account of Paul's farewell to the elders of Ephesus:Acts 20:17,28From Miletus, Paul sent to Ephesus for the elders (presbeteros) of the church ... [Paul, speaking to these elders said] "Guard yourselves and all the flock of which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers (episkopos)"Conclusion:Elders are functioning as bishops. Simply put, all bishops are Elders in the first century Christendom.Argument #2: Context in Texts Matthew 16:13-20 speaks of Petrine Honor in the church founding rather than Petrine Authority over the church.Premise 1: Simon is PeterPremise 2: Peter is Rock-foundationPremise 3: Jesus will build his church on Peter.Conclusion: Jesus will build his church on Simon. Jesus will build his church on Simon personally and he will also build the church on the prophets and the apostles including Simon generally. Simon was chosen by God the Father to reveal to him the orthodox faith (i.e. Jesus' godhood as the Son and salvific role as the Messiah) in order to pass it on to others who were chosen similarly like him to know the faith but not chosen identical like him to share the faith.Premise 1: Jesus said that on Simon "the Rock" the church will be build Premise 2: Simon was the first one to preach the gospel to both Jews and GentilesConclusion: Simon's calling is different than the rest of the saints in only one point which is in "knowing and accepting the faith". Others were called after him to share the exactly identical faith he has.Simply put, Simon was first among the saints not in rank nor in authority but in revelation.Conclusion: Simon was never ruling as a Pope. He received God's gift of salvation and he is to make it known to others. This priviledge was also extended to all who will ever received the only begotten Son. Simon wasn't the only one to receive this great duty. The fact is, he got it first than the rest of his fellows. Now, Jesus said," Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" ( Matthew 28:19) --Pope Dammasus (c304-384) was the first one to use the Petrine text (Matthew 16:13-20) to assert his supremacy over the whole of Christendom.Argument 3: Soteriology The apostolic church were saved from hell "by grace through faith" ( Ephesians 2:8). PRE-SALVIFIC STATE OF MANKINDSlaves to sin ( Romans 6:20). The reality of this slavery to sin denotes that people cannot not do sin.Anyone who wants to do good that glorifies God falls short because " there is no one righteous, no, not one. No one seeks God" ( Romans 3:10-11).Jesus himslef said "If you want to enter life, keep the commandments" ( Matthew 19:17)BUT Paul said in Galatians 3:10-12 that:10 For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them.” 11 Now that no one is justified by the Law before God is evident; for, “The righteous man shall live by faith.” 12 However, the Law is not of faith; on the contrary, “He who practices them shall live by them.”Jesus and Paul are in agreement. How was it? It's because the context of Jesus' words are these: ( After giving a parable that denotes impossibility of the rich man to be saved) The disciples were even more amazed, and said to each other, “Who then can be saved?” 27 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but not with God; all things are possible with God.”So, here we see Jesus response to the rich man as " keep the commandments to have eternal life" and the rich man claim that he did all of it yet he is not save because he didn't follow Jesus which is the sign of having salvation.Hence, Paul told us that:-- Those who does the Law for righteousness are "under a curse" Why? It is because a person with original sin cannot obey all of the Law that is why Paul said that "Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them.” Paul is very explicit that it is explicit that "The righteous man shall live by faith.” Notice that to live by faith doesn't make one rightoeus but that an already righteous man shall live by faith.James told us that "For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of all.( James 2:10). See? Tell me then if salvation can be gained in any form through obeying God's commands who on earth could obey all of the Law without failing one of it??? For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God’s law; indeed, it cannot.( Romans 8:7). It's pretty clear that no can based on this verse. Plus, Romans 3:10 already generalized it by saying that " there's no one righteous, no, not one. Romans 6:23 is very explicit: For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord.In Latin Vulgate, Romans 6:23 reads: stipendia enim peccati mors gratia autem Dei vita aeterna in Christo Iesu Domino nostroEternal Life IS a gift according to Paul.Premise 1: Gift means " freely given stuff etc. out of one's will"Premise 2: Eternal life is a giftConclusion: We can't work for eternal life because it's just a gift. Eternal life is free. How to receive eternal life is the same thing as how to receive a gift for eternal life is a gift. So, what do you do when your friend gives you a gift? Will you pay for it? Of course not. You just need to "accept"/ "receive" it. In systematic theology,biblical soteriology is this: The Son became flesh in order to live, crucified and die as to be raised from the dead after 3 days ( the Gospel i.e. goodnews). This good news must be "received by grace through faith not of works by all of the chosen ones because eternal life is a gift in Christ Jesus our Lord " ( John 1:12-13, Ephesians 1:11, 2:8-9, Romans 6:23). POST-SALVIFIC STATE OF MANKIND slaves to righteousness ( Romans 6:18) After receiving salvation, a saved person cannot not do good works. A saved person will "show his faith by his works" ( James 2:18). A faith without works is dead i.e. useless ( James 2:26). A saved person is in the process of sanctification( i.e. making holy by the Trinity). A saved person or a "righreous man shall live by faith". He must " look on Jesus who is the source and completer of his faith" and must trust that " the one who does good work in him will be the one continuing it until the day of Jesus Christ" ( Galatians 3:11, Hebrews 12:2, Philippians 1:6).Therefore, a saved person really has an "assurance of salvation" as 1 John 5:13 explicitly said: " To You who believe in the name of the Son of God, YOU HAVE ETERNAL LIFE."A saved person has free will to obey and to disobey. If he obey the consequence is not eternal life but blessings (Proverbs 19:23 ) and if he disobeys the consequence is not hell but chasetisemenet in order to continue to obey (Hebrews 12:6-8).The free will to disobey of the saved person will be exterminated according to the Scriptures at either 1) death or 2) resurrection. Conclusion: Salvation from hell is gained by trusting Christ alone as the only Savior according to the Scriptures but the Roman Catholic church teaches a very different soteriology.