The Liberal/progressive Democrat's are anti-woman!

I would like to start my rebuttal where I believe that my opponent has knowingly attempted to mislead the reader/s and misrepresent my argument, which is Sarah Palin's EXECUTIVE experience verses the combined EXECUTIVE experience of Obama and Biden combined. I'm sure that my opponent would readily agree that the,"experience", to which I refer would be experience that is more closely related to the office to which the candidates aspire, executive experience! If it were just an argument of any experience in any occupation, then I suppose we'd be voting for the candidates with the highest combined ages and years of work. I would also suppose that if my opponent were correct in his,"experience", argument, then the DNC would have put forth an eighty year old, unretired butcher who learned his trade as a 10 year old apprentice and has been practicing his trade for seventy years. Now, that would be some resume, but would that experience be germane to the issue and the office being sought? The obvious answer is no and my opponents list of Biden's Senate voting record is not germane to my argument of executive experience. I maintain that Sarah Palin has more executive experience than Obama and Biden, combined. My opponent has failed miserably to rebutt this contention! My opponent is, "Shocked", to learn that Palin has less than two years of experience as Govenor of Alaska. Is my opponent as equally, "shocked" that Senators Obama and Biden cannot claim to have 1/10th of that experience. I am certain that my opponent, like the reader, understands the difference between the three levels of government and that equating legislative experience to executive experience is disingenuous at best. My oppenent states that MSNBC's removing Matthew's and Olbermann shows that they are somehow not a liberal biased network. I'm sure my opponent is aware that MSNBC didn't make this move two years ago, rather two days ago. Matthew's and Olbermann were given nearly two years of unfettered access to the MSNBC viewer/s and now, less than two month's prior to the election, MSNBC reads the negative polls concerning Matthew's and Olberman's liberal bias and pulls the two anchors/commentators. Does my opponent suggest that MSNBC has changed it's liberal bias, or has MSNBC responded to the polls? I suggest that it's the later and purely a financial decision and has nothing to do with a change if political ideology! The Obama campaigns remarks concerning Sarah palin's ability to govern given her, "motherly responsibilities", speak for themselves and are purely sexist! My opponent ignored my challenge to produce for the reader a single instance where a Democrat politician, or liberal media has made such a remark concerning Obama and his ability to govern having two young children, himself and a wife with a full time carrer. This is blatent sexism and the reader can cocnclude that my opponent's failure to produce such a statement concerning Obama, proves that no such comment exists! The five, (5), network media comments that my opponent has put forth as proof that the major media are not left leaning were all made by the token conservatives that work for the various networks. I would hardly call Bill Kristol a liberal! As for my opponent's supplying the reader with a link to "womenforbarackobabam", I respond with, http://women.johnmccain.com... I challenge the reader to refer to my argument concerning Palin's executive experience verses that of Obama and Biden and to read my opponent's misrepresentation of my argument. This is a standard liberal tactic, redefine another's argument and beat it down. This is called the, "Strawman" tactic and the liberals have used it well!