The universe cares about human beings

Now pro has taken a really really cheap approach to this debate. Pro has attempted to redefine everything.Let me lay down the actual definitions of "universe" and "care".Universe: " The Universe is all of spacetime and everything that exists therein, including all planets, stars, galaxies, the contents ofintergalactic space, the smallest subatomic particles, and all matter and energy.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Similar terms include thecosmos, the world, reality, and nature. "Care:" the provision of what is necessary for the health, welfare, maintenance, and protection of someone or something. "Contention 1: Conscious IntentionalityThe problem with the resolution is that, in order for something to "Care", the something must be conscious. If not, the result is absurdity.Pro's argument is basically as follows:P1) Things that care about humans promote human lifeP2) Houss promote human lifeC1) Houses care about humans.Well no, houses are not in the business of caring, we have just evolved in a way to utilize houses. "Consciousness is the quality or state of awareness, or, of being aware of an external object or something within oneself.[1][2] It has been defined as: sentience, awareness, subjectivity, the ability to experience or to feel, wakefulness, having a sense ofselfhood, and the executive control system of the mind.""A mind /G2;ma=8;nd/ is the set of cognitive faculties that enables consciousness, perception, thinking, judgement, and memory—a characteristic of humans, but which also may apply to other life forms." Per my prior definition, we are aware that consciousness implies awareness. What produces awareness? Awareness has its origin in the insular cortex. The right anterior insula aids interoceptive awareness .How can one measure self-awareness? Well it's trivially easy, you just place a mirror in front of an animal and if they recognize themself, they are self-aware. Simple right? Wrong, only ten animals are reported to have passed this test, they are listed as follows: Humans Orangutans Chimpanzees Gorillas Bottlenose Dolphins Elephants Orcas Bonobos Rhesus Macaques European Magpies Why Consciousness Is A Brain Function: The brain is responsible for all of the functions that are associated with consciousness. As for as we know, objects without brains, don't have the capacity to do any of the aforementioned qualities(TO ALL YOU BOTANIST: shut up, I know plants do some of these things without brains, i'm trying to make a point.) Furthermore, the mere fact that a physical event that effects the brain can render you unconscious, is compelling evidence that consciousness is essentially physical and related to the brain. In order to fulfill the BoP, pro must prove the universe is consciously promoting human life.Contention 2: The universe, on balance, is not conducive to human life. 0.03% of the universe can substain human life.There are roughly 8.74 million species.1/874,000,000=1.144165e^-9.If the universe cared about human life, I'd imagine we'd comprise more of the universe than that.>99.9% of the universe is not conducive to human life.To say the universe cares about human life, because a small percent of the universe can support life, is to commit the composition fallacy. Pro is arguing as follows:P1) If the universe can support human life, then it cares about human life.P2) 0.03% of the universe can support human lifeC) The universe cares about human life.This is not valid, because just because something is true for a part of something, does not mean it's true for the whole.Conclusions:1. If the universe is not conscious, it's not caring.2. >99.9% of the universe is not conducive to human life.http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.plosbiology.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...