Baby-killers (AKA "Abortionists") Deserve the Death Penalty

My opponent wrote: ""Malice is an emotional state" Perhaps, Malice more accurately is, the intention do evil." Intention is an emotional state. "when attempting to establish that the woman is guilty of a crime" I never attempted to do so with any woman during this debate, so that is a straw man logical fallacy on your part. "you also need to establish grounds for EVERY abortion to be carried out with some malicious intent." No I don't. "One example of an abortion carried out without establishing malicious motive would be in the event of a threat to the woman's own life." That has never happened. " she is faced with a choice, carry on with the pregnancy risking her own life" That has never happened. "which if your opinion were law would result in her death either way." No it wouldn't -- you just straw manned my argument yet again. Therefore I won the debate. ***Baby-killers (AKA "Abortionists") Deserve the Death Penalty*** your argument establishes that woman who get abortions are "Baby-killers"" I never made that claim, no, so that is a strawman logical fallacy on your part. "ABORTIONISTS deserve death." Thank you for your agreement and support, and God bless you! BTW, do you think that the terms "abortionist" and "pregnant woman" are synonymous? They are not. "your argument fails to hold water." Correction: Your straw man of my argument holds no water. You have yet to even attempt to address my actual argument. "Also, I'll take a little extra time to unpack your appeal to emotions fallacy," I didn't commit such a fallacy. "in attempting to paint EVERY abortion as the dismemberment of the baby by, "Tearing her body limb from limb using razor-sharp stainless steel implements"" I did not make that attempt, so that is yet another straw man logical fallacy on your part. " by misrepresenting how abortions are conducted" It is not a misrepresentation -- abortions are actually practiced by tearing the baby's body limb from limb using razor-sharp stainless steel implements. " by misrepresenting that it is the only way an abortion is carried out" I never made that statement, so that is yet another straw man logical fallacy on your part. Therefore I won the debate. "you're attempting to establish in your reader a sense of disgust in that one procedure" I never made such an attempt, so that is also a straw man logical fallacy on your part. "an emotional response." Your question had to do with malice, which is an emotional state, so you can't fault me simply because my response to your question included some emotional content. That would be an intellectually dishonest double-standard, but then again, believers in atheist Dogma are natural-born liars, so there is no surprise that you did that. " properly identify a fallacy." Without God, nobody could properly identify a fallacy. "1. The vow you're referring to is not LAW " I never claimed that it was, so that is yet another straw man logical fallacy on your part. "2. There is no legal demand that every doctor must take these vows" Yes there is. " (Again, argue in the facts," Without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between facts and falsehoods. "At this point it's rather obvious you have no real argument to establish" Yes I do. ", or any ability to articulately express any factual evidence to support your claim" Yes I do. Also, without God, there could be no evidence for or against any claim. " and are more interested in patting yourself on the back in some vain attempt to self-establish your ideology, thus falsely reinforcing and justifying your beliefs." Without God, none of that could be objectively wrong. "your continued shouting "I WIN, I WIN!"" I never shouted that, so that is another straw man logical fallacy on your part. "But again, congrats" For winning the debate, you mean? Thank you for that admission, and thanks for your time! =)