Isn't it time to recognize the elephant in the room

Con's Argument here Round 3 and Lookingattheissues response here on Debate.org Nov. 21ST 2015 CON Posted,"I had a somewhat difficult time combing through the opponent's argument, as it seems largely like some sort of ill-conceived political tirade against liberals and Muslims. However, I'll pick out the parts that are relevant to this debate, then cover them in the order provided. Lookingattheissues reply to Con November 21St. 2015 on DEBATE.org You posted in your reply to my post,"......it seems largely like some sort of ill-conceived political tirade against liberals and Muslims....." Lookingattheissues reply....I don't believe that what I posted consists of a tirade but sometime what some imply as tirades are in reality statements of facts that don't comport with the situation as they see them or would prefer the situation to be. "The Crusades - Middle Ages, There was no inevitability, ..... about the wars fought for possession of the Holy Land between western European Christians and near-eastern Muslims from the late 11th to the late 13th centuries." which you mentioned in your reply. Incidents that occured in the middle ages are hardly to be considered relevant or causative of what has, and is happening today between Muslims and the American people. I remember that when 3,000. innocent American citizens, who had done nothing to the Muslims, danced and hooted when they heard that Muslim terrorists had flew planes into the Twin Towers in New York and that Americans had been killed as a results. "Remembering the ..... Arab Muslims 'Palestinians' "' that Danced .....in the streets when 3,000 Americans ... " were murdered. .... Danced .....in the streets when 3,000 Americans ..." ...were murdered. "Sep 01, 2008 " Remembering the Devilish Arab Muslims 'Palestinians' that Danced .....in the streets when 3,000 Americans ... " died. www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2072444/posts CON Response"This seems to be the first point being made. The opponent compares "liberals" to The Emperor's New Clothes, saying that they pretend that Muslims don't exist all in the name of being politically correct." Lookingattheissues....The politically correct Liberal Democrats refuse to acknowledge that terrorist acts carried on against Americans have been carried out by Muslims and clouds this fact by the use of labelsTerrorists, ISIS, ISEO. ,...." CON: The opponent makes a generalization of political correctness based upon his perception of what that is. He has no real evidence to support the idea that generally, political correctness relates to his resolution, or is even a bad thing. Lookingattheissues: Political correctness Political correctness (adjectivally, politically correct, commonly abbreviated to PC) is an ordinarily pejorative term used to describe language, actions, or policies seen as being excessively calculated not to offend or disadvantage any particular group of people in society. "In order to beat your enemy, you must first know your enemy..."If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle." " Sun Tzu "WASHINGTON " They"re burning and beheading victims in the name of Islam, but President Obama delivered a major speech Wednesday on combating violent extremism " while refusing to use the words "Muslim terrorists." "No religion is responsible for terrorism " people are responsible for violence and terrorism," Obama told a crowd that included Muslim community leaders at the White House. lookingattheissues: But, Muslims are "People," terrorists are Muslims. Obama is quite good at using semantics, "euphemisms," "an inoffensive word or phrase substituted for one considered offensive or hurtful, especially one concerned with religion,...." Why doesn't Obama identify Terrorists as Muslims, perhaps Obamas Book," The Audacity of Hope," would shed some light why this is. In Obama's book, ThE AUDACITY OF HOPE," he states," I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." In responding to a terrorist attack, there are only two choices - take the fight to the enemy or wait until they hit you again...." Kay Granger CON: The opponent, in R1, rather explicitly implied that we should remove Muslims from the general population. This is part of the resolution we are arguing. The Muslims entering this country from where ever they come from could be somewhat like the Trojan horse of Greek mythology to gain entrance into Troy during the Trojan War. How better to do harm to Americans than to mingle among the population with no way of identifying a enemy Muslim from a friendly, good intentioned Muslim. How did the Boston Marathon Bombers go unidentified until they struck, Because they were allowed to mingle among the American population. Con Posted: it's not so obvious that this is a violent religion. v191 states that you should slay those who are fighting you and retaliate when you have been attacked. Lookinatthe issues: Was the "American ,Steven Sotloff, American Journalist, Beheaded By ISIS" fighting Muslims, were the 3,000 Americans murdered in New York by Muslim terrorists fighting Muslims. And you say,"it's not so obvious that this is a violent religion...." Con: ".....Many Christians have interpretted the Bible to be a violent one,... True Christians believe in the bible's teachings,Luke 6:31 "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you..." Of course, because one identifys themselves as Christian doesn't mean that they are anymore than whether a Muslim is a non- violent Muslim or a terrorist Muslim. CON: My opponent mostly offers a political diatribe with an extreme goal, while offering little supporting evidence along the way. Lookingattheissues: The evidence is quite evident to anyone and I listed the violent terrorist attacks by Muslims upon Americans in one of my previous posts. Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. John Adams Marcus Tullius Cicero "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear." Marcus Tullius Cicero