U.S. Citizens have the right to Rebel (But Won't)

My opponent says and I quote "My opponent quotes the declaration of independence as to why the government allows American citizens to rebel. My simple statement is that the declaration was not used to the formation of our government, it was used to say to Britain, "we will fight (rebel, yes) for this land. however, my opponent using it to say that we can is misusing the document" I ask you... are you a judge or a lawyer or do you have any source that states they would say this. If you were the Judge you might. Not all judges would because it can be assumed that if the Founding Fathers agreed it was an unalienable right then everyone has the right regardless of what country the live in....because it is unalienable.... "This amendments purpose was to keep other nations from invading America, not to keep the government accountable. Note how it says "security"not "accountability." You pretty much repeated yourself and like I said before security can be the security of anything. You are putting words in there mouth. Read it for what it is. It says security. Securing your rights is security. I don't know where you even got the word accountability or how it relates. You may think it is only for the security from other nations but you also didn't write the Constitution so you can't add things to it. You say only against other countries and that can not be discerned from the text. "He states Thomas Jefferson's famous quote on a rebellion every twenty years. There really should, but since my opponent agreed to my definition that success is not guaranteed, if there was, then this quote helps my side. Thank you" You still haven't explained how this aids you. It aids me because he agree we have the right to rebel whether victorious or not. This doesn't aid you in any way. The definition of rebel doesn't make this aid you either. "1. Americans are rebelling. Have you ever heard of "occupy wall street" or the "tea party movement"? these protests are obviously meant to overthrow the current system that is put in place by our government, but there success is not guaranteed, which doesn't matter. My opponent accepted my definition" They are not trying to OVERTHROW the government. To overthrow means to take over and either alter the former or prepare an all new government. They are simply protesting for change. They want bills and laws passed not to become socialist or some other form of government. They simply want the Congress to take more action for the citizens. They are definitely NOT trying to overthrow the government. They are a movement for change. "So what does the OWS Movement want? Our preliminary results suggest that the Occupy Wall Street movement has an array of political demands that are not very different from mainstream Americans."[1] They only want to makes changes and protesting..."Is all of the protesting directed in the right place?"[2] Protesting is not rebelling. Even if you were right and Occupy wall street is a rebellion. How does that help your case. It proves we have the right to rebel which is my side of the argument. "My opponent also shays rebellion, saying that it is irrelevant because it failed. Doesn't matter. Americans rebelled, and that proves pro wrong" Here again you repeat yourself so my former defense stands that I didn't say it is irrelevant because it failed it is irrelevant because it was not supported by the majority of the people. Conclusion: His rebuttal was almost identical to his former rebuttal which I already disproved. His ideas are not backed and are his own opinion. He has put up only one counter argument which I disproved by definition and sources. He can no longer put up an argument because the final round is rebuttal only. Vote Pro because Con didn't use any sources, he repeated his ideas without changing his fight so I disproved his arguments twice. He never put up a standing rebuttal to my views. I used two physical sources and other online sources and he used none. Remember the final round is for rebuttal only not counter arguments. [1]http://www.huffingtonpost.com... [2]http://freefrombroke.com...