I will not contradict myself!

Thank you for accapting this debate, I can see already I will have quite the challenge with questions like number 4. I will do my best to not contridict myself now and answer all the questions. 1) "Will you contradict yourself?" It is my intention to not do any such thing. 2) "Is it possible that you will contradict yourself?" Well, considering I didnt get some amature opponent for the CON position of this debate, but someone I know from his past debates like this one http://www.debate.org... that creative thinking is his strong suite, So it's quite possible he will get me to contradict myself. But I will be positive in attitude and try to believe that I can make it one debate without contradicting myself. 3) "Have you contradicted yourself yet?" No I don't think I have yet. I believe both my answers to question's 1 and 2 are consistant with each other. 4) "Is the answer to this question 'no'?" Thankfully, the rules state in round one that I must answer all the questions in 'some manner' so I'm not restricted to just 'yes' or 'no' answers. Obviously if I put 'yes' then it would be wrong, and if I put 'no' then by definiton that would also be wrong. I answer that 'this question' is a paradox. Personally I think that statement "'this queston' is a paradox." counts as giveing an answer of some kind with an oppinon; but if you feel it's akin to answering with a "I don't know" then go ahead and give yourself an 11th question next round as allowed by Rule 3. 5) "If I'm a fish, and you're a fish, are we both fish?" Yes, that's the grammar I learned growing up, that the plural of 'fish' is still 'fish'. Interestingly I've notice if you ever refer to a fish as 'fishy' (like a girl, or a 3 year old) then 'fishy' becomes plural as 'fishies'. 6) "If you're a box, and I'm a box, are we both box?" No, the grammar I learned growing up alway's reffered to 'box' in the plural as 'boxes'. 7) "Have you contradicted yourself yet?" It seem's a waist to me for you to ask this question twice. You will have the opportuniety to argue that my answers to any combination of the questions are contradictions round 2, 3, 4, and 5; basically the rest of the debate. It's redundant to try and get me to contradict on a question like this when getting me to do so hinges on having already made a contradiction. And if I already have then that previous contradiction negates the resolution all by itself. That's what I think anyway, but mabye you will show me a different purpose for asking this question again that I'm not creatively thinking of, so I will answer it again simalar to my answer for question 3, No I do not think I have yet contradicted myself with my answers to the past 6 questions 8) "What's the squre root of 69?" Well, this calculator reads the irrational number out to 8.306623862918075 http://www.calculator.com...=- 9) "Do you believe in God?" I believe in God. 10) "Don't you believe in God?" I believe in God If 'God' needs defined to reduce confusion about those answers so we understand I do not contradict in those last two questions then I would like to specify that I of course do not mean 'a flying spagettie monster' when I say 'God' or an 'Anceint Astronout'. I mean the Methodist, Christian view of 'God' that is written of in the bible, a book that is well worth reading. I look foward to reading your 10/11 new questions next round and your arguments for how I may have contradicted myself with the 10 questions in this round.