BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Resolve: Cyberbullying should be a criminal offense

cyberbullying should not be a criminal offense because if petite items like this were considered a criminal offense than everything else to that minority would also receive criminal offenses to be logically fair. .. . some states are in aggrement with me BECAUSE they have not passed particular laws to substain this criminal offense. Everyone needs to get a grip on reality and face the difficulties and when the going gets tough talk it out. <3
Resolve: Cyberbullying should be a criminal offense

I believe that cyberbullying shouldnot be a criminal offense because in most cases children and or adults are just being plain out STUPID. I think this "offender" should be punished to the minimal agree at first attempt and the punishment should be severe enough to make them realize what is happening to them to cause this. They could maybe get placed into a simple sort of rehabillitaion center until doctors and or specialists are center of this.......
Rap Battle 5!

Read fast, if you're able You're opposing an undefeated divinity and endeavouring to stride far above your level, I'll be exposing your untreated virginity and severing your pride, I am the devil. Your crack smoking mother is a fat swelled Whale, It's a fact that like no other she's of unparalleled scale She is eating too immensely; it's time for her to Diet, When I'm beating her intensely she won't stay quiet. I will blast her in her bucket back to whence she came, She won't last when I fuc it, she will feel intense shame. Your mums methane, will corrupt the atmosphere, it'll sprain your brain and erupt your hemisphere. With a stench of which, is comparable to none, You know that wench of a bitch has a terrible son. Why are you smoking on a blunt, is this showing your masculinity? Why aren't you Poking up a c.u.n.t, Are you forgoing your virginity? This is the sheer capability of my mind, It brings a tear of gracility yet to be defined. Each verse I have written has a rhyme combo of at least 3, where my opponent only has singular rhyme combos and in rare cases double combos. My very first verse is a 6x combo.
Rap Battle 5!

Next round, Ding Ding! Out comes Rocky, her to whip your @ss, gonna be a bloody flooging, Your raps are slow paced, prone to clogging, Must be that brain of yours that old thing's foggy. The Contender keeps talking about my sex preferences Sex with guys controls his mind, need an exorcist? Think you even have a chance, bjtch I'm the best at this, You'll lose so bad your more negative than a pessimist! Asian guy right here, how can he read with those slants? This is a rap battle, sophisticated, we don't do no rants, And what are your doing, pull up yo pants, You can get blow later, rap now, even with no chance I'm an American, and this is WWII I use a m1 garrand on japs and chinks, I warned you! Riding my djck is your mom, I'm like "This wh0re's new!" I'll grab her by the pvssy one time or two. Weak mof, your rhyme make people start laughing at you. Go to the first aid station for roast with ajisthetruth.
Rap Battle 5!

Just wanna mention, a bit about your sexuality, I'm bringing attention, to your love for bestiality, Cus you're a genetic, abnormality and have a pathetic, personality. You're clearly a man slag slurping on some anus You're queerly and man f.a.g burping after sum gayness. We got people out there looking for the loch ness monster, When little do they realise you're a cock less youngster . Like a frog spawns tadpoles, Your mum forms glory holes But she the one shoving her dick through the hole so you can lick it, And you're the one loving it thick and taking it whole so you can dipstick it. How can a freak like you pretend to know how to rap? Cus my technique is a godsend and all you do is c.r.a.p. This right here is your demise, Cus like a fan girl, I'm the one you'll idolize, My lyrical originality will make you lose your mind, My satirical brutality will abuse till you're blind.
Rap Battle 5!

I have yet to see the lyrics of Masterful But I already know they'll be disaster-full You use your fat mom as a h0e, And your cheap rhymes make your round a placid go You think your tough with that katana sword? I'll fvck you up even though I already gotta wh0re I'll put you in a big @ss volcano and let the lava pour Watch as your face melts and yell "Ha ha, score!" I checked your bio, you seemed ashamed Not sayin a thing, you're not even acclaimed. I'm a prodigy of Slim, you're a copy of Wayne I fought people like you, you're all the same Easy shjt, you need to quit when I see you spit you make me queasy, prjck, my speed is lit your meat is bit by your peeps with shjt Had your lyrics once and I peed on it! 42-year old man of the Shinto religion In other words, your in the shjt-hoe division I'll snipe your with unbelievable precision You can hit me with a knife and clear vision Occupation- Self employed? What you do, use your djck as a own-self toy? I bet it's small, you're a little elf-boy And all shriveled up like old-man Elroy Relationship-Not saying? Is your relationship with your hand decaying? Have your own hand jobs been to much to be paying? You could also count you and your mom in bed, laying. So I guess that you're really not dating, Who the hell would want some of that mating? You're thinking "I can beat this guy maybe!" No, you are up against notorious Jim Shady.
Affirmative Action

Here is the challenge. Full Resolution: Affirmative action is good. I will be negating this resolution. BoP is shared. Definitions: Affirmative Action: "A policy in which an individual's color, race, sex, religion or national origin are taken into account by a business or the government in order to increase the opportunities provided to an underrepresented part of society. Affirmative action is designed to increase the number of people from certain groups within businesses, institutions and other areas of society in which they have historically had low representation. It is often considered a means of countering historical discrimination against a particular group."[1] Good: "Satisfactory in quality, quantity, or degree."[2] Rules: 1. The first round is for acceptance. 2. A forfeit or concession is not allowed. 3. No semantics, trolling, or lawyering. 4. Debate resolution, definitions, rules, and structure cannot be changed without asking in the comments before you post your round 1 argument. Debate resolution, definitions, rules, and structure cannot be changed from all moments after the debate has been formalized. Voters, in the case of the breaking of any of these rules by either debater, all seven points in voting should be given to the other person. Debate Structure: Round 1: Acceptance Round 2: Presenting all arguments (no rebuttals by con) Round 3: Refutation of opponent's arguments (no new arguments) Round 4: Defending your original arguments and conclusion (no new arguments) Sources: [1]: http://www.investopedia.com... [2]: http://dictionary.reference.com...
racisim

what is wrong with being racist? blacks hate whites just as much as whites hates blacks. personally i do not care about any blacks all they are is people that run their mouths and spend time in jail and steal and ruin the white race of america. that goes for mexicans 2 everyone that tries to cross the border should be shot in the head right then and there. there body should sit there and rot for the others to see whats going to happen to them.All these indians need to go back where they came from and stay over there.If you see a black person on a bicycle you better run them over because thats probably your bicycle you got stollen from you along time ago.All black people should be in the circus espically SHAQ hes the tallest monkey ever lived so everyone could get a good look at the worlds tallest monkey.
Dragons probably existed

my first week 1) NO NO NO they have support. Just not in the form of calcium bones like most animals do. They might have some sort of freakish bone that will decompose. It could be made of cartilage only and still have support, your ears and nose do. It could also be something we know nothing about like a fibrous tree like material. trees are super strong and they decompose. Or it could even be like a penis. No bones just muscle and cartilage that hardens. 2)Samuel Champlain was alive in the A.D. 1600s not the B.C 3000s! I am talking ancient colonies like almost all Asian , Mayan, French, British, African, Middle Eastern and Australian civilizations. It is also not proved that all people arise from one group of people. If it were then we would have proved Adam and Eve are real too. I agree that just because it was drawn doesn't mean it is real but what are the odds that every (not just major) civilization depicted dragons almost exactly the same. There are weird things that happen but a bunch of imaginations coming into sync is a little crazy. 3)We took their food. Dragons may be more powerful then humans but so are lions, tigers and bears (Oh My sorry I had to) yet we steal their food and kill them all the time throughout history. T-Rex was too but he couldn't survive mother nature. Maybe they couldn't survive the ice ages that humans survived. Maybe when the Mammoths started to die out so did dragons because they couldn't sustain enough food sources. I'm not saying they could blow fire or anything (maybe). And us meager humans have never proved why all these organisms die. We speculate and decide we are right. Children do the same and they are normally wrong. 4)They are not as smart as humans. When humans started to run out of food they farmed and ranched. Dragons couldn't figure out how to just start ranching and raising their own cows. When will people realize brains are better than bronze...period!
Dragons probably existed

My third and final opinion is that this new method is not soft. LOL! A debate isn't what you agree on!!! it tests the debating skills of a person! Anyways... 1) Your theory of no bones has some flaws. Dragons are like GIGANTIC bats. Yes they have some membranes but what holds them up? Nothing! If every single living organism that had bones get their bones suddenly disappeared, how will we eat? How will we live the life? How we will play Black Ops? We would be able to. So, dragons have to have bones because they have to fly, open their mouth to eat and breathe fire, and protect their brains. 2) They are drawn the same because most of the world came from one colony; the French. Samuel de Champlain sailed to Canada. That means that most of the people on Earth 3000 years ago were French. And if you draw something it doesn't mean it's true. Vampires, Manga, and kids' imaginations were drawn doesn't mean their true. 3) FOOD. You stated that dragons were massive. If they were that strong, won't they live forever? Dragons would be way more powerful than humans so how come humans thrived for 3000 years? And dragons had to eat. How come there were no fossils of dead animals or humans? Scientists today can find out why an organism died? How can you explain that?
Dragons probably existed

Wait, you already lose you said they exist. I WIN! YAY! Wait, I have to start now. Damn! 1) No bones would be found we are talking about a massive creature that could fly. It probably had no bones. Maybe cartilage or some other very strong light weight material but not bone so it probably wouldn't last. 2) THEY ARE DRAWN ON EVERY CONTINENT!!!!!!! Every ancient civilization had some form of the dragon and most looked almost exactly alike with slight variations! How do you explain that. These civilizations had no connections to each other.
miracles occur, but almost never to atheists

here is an example of an organization that uses three miracles to dub 'sainthood' on people. perhaps millions, if not hundreds of thousdsand of examples http://en.wikipedia.org... http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com... there are Eucharistic miracles, documented. there are tons of medical 'miracles'. how would it be an insult to God to have miracles? he can do whatever he wants, and to intervene is to express his love of man. you seem to be arguing what your perception is, that it'd be ridiculous for him to intervene... and thinking that's what reality is. that's placing your own thought about reality above reality itself. reality is there are miracles, or things that appear supernatural, that are scientifically inexplicable. you can define miracles as being part of creation and so not really a miracle, but this is semantics. the bottomline is there are inexplicable thigns happening, that appear supernatural. and the bottomline is you don't see it happening to atheists. im sure there are miracles that happen in Africa. that doesn't mean all of Africa's poor economic conditions must be solved for there to be a God. if tehre's a God tehre's a reason for everything, and their system is part of it.
miracles occur, but almost never to atheists

thanks for your post, The definition of a miracle is that the laws of nature take a holiday and something impossible happens that challenges those laws. This is an insult to God , (if he exists), because if god is all knowing and all powerful, He has every thing planned from the beginning of time and his design of the natural laws are designed to obey his will. 1.The idea that he has to keep making little adjustments that go against his own laws is ridiculous, therefore miracles don't happen. Rare things could happen a 16 seed could beat a 1 in basketball but it's unlikely so even if it did happen it's not a miracle (it's simply a rare event) 2.You failed to give 1 example of something miraculous happening in current time or even 1 invalid example from 70 years ago 3. There are African's that believe in God. (mainly the ones we give aid to, they notice how good we're doing and change there lifestyle.)
miracles occur, but almost never to atheists

miracles by definition are things that are inexplicable and apparently supernatural.... no definition ive ever seen says they are impossible. for you to argue that, is to only be right by defining yourself in box, rigging the standards without regard to what really is true. how do you account for all this stuff that appears supernatural, and particularly that you cant find examples happening to atheists? what happens w Africans doesn't have anything to do with the valliidity or lack thereof of miracles. questioning or being upset w God's love, or what the idea of God etc, doesn't necessarily have anything to do w miracles.
miracles occur, but almost never to atheists

Wow I've never read so much spam in my life your kidding right you showed no videos no clear proof just garbage, you may be the worst debater of all-time seriously get off this website ( "if tehre's a God tehre's a reason for everything, and their system is part of it". really are you kidding me if miracles happened why would god not give it to the people who need it???) First of all you made god sound like a dush and that's hard to do and 2nd theirs no way you won this debate or any other EVER. how do you say theirs millions of miracles document not show a single video example and not explain why the ones who need them are neglected.
Donald trump

whatever, who cares that I spell stuff wrong. if anyone disagrees with me saying that trump is racsis, THEN YOU ARE CRA-Z! trump is a butthead >:C. GRRRRR DIE IN A HOLE DONALD DUMP!!! blah blah stupid trump. set fire 2 your hair, poke a stick at a grizzly bear, remember the dumb ways to die song, well trump is stupid enough to do everything that song says, at least I wish he was. hello Jirachi, I wish trump's pants fall down and he gets impeached, thank you. anyway SCREW YOU DONALD DUMP
Donald trump

donald trump is bad because he is compleitly racis because he said mexicans don't belong in the USA, and he wants to make a wall between mexico, and the USA. also he is stupid, and has no reason being elected president. also he says he wants to get rid of ISIS, and he calles them towe* *****( i wont say it, it is racis). trump deserves to DIE, and get sent 2 hell. shoot yerself trump!
This video shows some pretty weird stuff like it or not.

A lot of the words used in this debate could be interpreted many different ways. The choir children being chosen to "represent" Newtown children could have meant that look-alikes were chosen on purpose, and their names not revealed to protect them from media attention (perfectly normal). 322 can have a lot of meanings, most of them pretty innocuous. The "sandy hook" symbol could have easily arisen by accident, and the name "Sandy Hook" long predates the school. You also have to look at things from the other way round. The Family Guy episode and the Batman movie could have given the attackers at the Boston Marathon and Sandy Hook ideas.
This video shows some pretty weird stuff like it or not.

Thanks for debating. You have to admit that the kids at that choir (not all but some like Josephine gay, Ben Wheeler, Avielle Richman and Caroline Previdi) look very similar. Also there's no doubt that Jack McDonnell and Walker Previdi were up there on that stage as well. It's so strange that a girl that looks A LOT like Caroline is seen with a woman who looks A LOT like her mom with a boy who obviously has to be Walker Previd or at least a boy who looks very very similar. With the number 322 and all the stuff that was mentioned about the batman movie, the Super Bowl and the map with a big sandy hook written on it...is pretty chilling. Also the family guy episode with all that disturbing stuff about Peter winning the Boston marathon by running people over and the fact that a month later people actaully were killed and injured at the Boston marathon...could he all a coincidence but even so it's very disturbing.
This video shows some pretty weird stuff like it or not.

It's pretty easy to contrive a coincidence. Kids in suburban white America look a lot alike, and I've often mistaken my little brother for one of his friends. About the numbers, some of them don't line up. One related video mentioned that Star Wars is satanic, and one satanic number mentioned is 322, awfully close to one important number in Star Wars, 327... but no cigar. There are also debating theories, one of which is that the children were sacrificed to Satan, in which case they wouldn't still be here. I don't trust people offering "secret truths" that can't be reconciled. Also, some people misspeak, but people often do that in traumatic times like those. A lot of the "leads" offered in the videos are awfully shaky and most are easily explainable away with mundane explanations. But above all, never explain with a great conspiracy what can be explained by human stupidity. Even more importantly, it's awfully hard to fake emotion and those parents looked pretty genuine.
This video shows some pretty weird stuff like it or not.

Watch Timothy hunters video "sandy hook kids alive at Super Bowl (w/parents) updated information. That's the only way I can debate you on this. 1 I don't know about Emile Parker or Grace McDonnell but some the other "victims" were in that choir. 2 The whole thing with the number 322 is creepy. Even if it is a coincidence it's still chilling. 3 The family guy Boston marathon part was very disturbing. Family guy is a horrible show to begin with but joking about killing people at a marathon is pretty weird and twisted. Also even if it is a coincidence that that episode came out a month before the bombing it's still creepy and fishy.
This video shows some pretty weird stuff like it or not.

I'm not the kind of guy to flip out. White suburban America is so huge, and those photos in your video were blurry enough, that the Super Bowl organizers could easily have convinced people who looked nearly identical to appear in the choir. I don't know about you, but if I and my best friend got together, we could plan a bombing in a couple of weeks. Anyway, I chose this debate because I feel that what appear to be conspiracies are usually just coincidences or stupid oversights, and people should not spread them to people while denigrating them as "sheeple."
This video shows some pretty weird stuff like it or not.

Thanks for being calm and not flipping out like some people (liam12). I'm sorry but some of those kids aren't look a likes. The. Brothers Walker and Jack are clearly the actual boys. Some of the kids (Ben more than the others) look strikingly similar to the victims. There's no way that's a look a like. If it was just the two brothers who did the bombing than they probably begin planning before the family guy episode was made (mid March) so it probably wasn't what influenced them, if it as just them and no one else knew which is unlikely.
Death Penalty

Asides from a bloated sense of vengeance, you don't really make any case for allowing the death penalty. In what way does 'repaying what they did' serve society? It seems to me that you look to the courts for revenge, not their actual purpose of maintaining civil law. Finally, you contradict yourself. In round 1 you say 'an eye for an eye' but that would only justify the death penalty for murderers. Yet now in round 2 you allow it for grand larceny?
Death Penalty

The role of a criminal justice system is to reform the guilty and protect society from the guilty until they are reformed. Reforming cannot be achieved by the death penalty and it is not needed to protect society, because prisons exist. To support the death penalty out of a desire for revenge is a degenerate attitude to hold in society. Also, the courts are not 100% correct in their verdict all the time. Out of 1000s of convicted murderers, there is bound to be at least 10 who were convicted wrongly. According to your proposition, these 10 innocent people would be murdered. The death penalty also does not function as a valid deterrent as people who commit murder either do not plan on getting caught, or have lost their desire to live. Threatening to kill them will have no effect on their decision whether or not to kill someone. Finally, the death penalty reeks of hypocrisy. By punishing murderers we are saying, as a society, that murder is wrong. We completely contradict ourselves by then murdering the murderers. In the words of St. John Paul II, 'how can we teach that killing is wrong by killing?'
Should every home have a TV

Family time is not sitting in front of a tv. Family time is doing something together that has communicating and interaction, not siting on their butts watching tv. You could say it can be used for educational purposes but usally kids use it to be entertained. Plus the kids will be too tempted to Watch something else besides educational purposes. Tv makes you fat. You need exersize and sitting on your butt for 3 hours doesn't count as exersize. Why waste your time on watching people do something on a screen and do something that is worth it.