The sandy hook "shooting" is full of satanic symbols.

Thank you for your response. It seems to me that your arguments stems from one source, which is the article on Veteran Today (VT) (http://www.veteranstoday.com...). To summarize, that article listed 10 reasons as to why Sandy Hook was a hoax. For my rebuttal, I will demonstrate that all 10 reasons listed on VT has no evidence backing up their claims. It should be noted that by disapproving even ONE of the instances listed on VT should qualify me to win this debate for it suggests that the information provided by VT is not credible. Additionally, it would also prove my point in R1 that Google will list results based on keywords and that it does not bias between fact or fiction. 1. Proof of death have been suppressed The first assertion stated that there were no death certificates. Specifically, it was stated that the state, CT, did it's best to protect the identity of the victims. "Remarkably, the state has done its best to avoid releasing the death certificates and even recordings of the 911 calls. Death certificates were eventually "released" but not to the public or those who might want to investigate the case further, where only a short, general summary was available." [sic] Originally, the state did in fact tried to prevent the release of the death certificate of all the victims to protect their identify. However, it was later shown that the certificates were released to the PUBLIC according to the Freedom of Information Act. (http://www.nydailynews.com...) It should be noted that while the state attorney Stephan Sedensky had good intentions protecting the victim's identities, his decision was unconstitutional. I state this because this is where misinterpretation of a person's intentions may lead to extreme assertions on any tragic event. 2. Emergency protocols were not followed Is one is very hard to prove because it's all based on opinion as to whether emergency protocols were followed or not. Just as the passage stated that it seemed calm from the outside, that does not mean that the situation overall was calm. One has to realize that the incident took place inside the school, not outside. The article stated that they did not see any body bags on scene. This could be attributed to many factors. It could be that the victims weren't pronounced dead until they were fully diagnosed by a physician who deemed that no lifesaving support can save the patient or that the protocol for Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) is to triage all the patients on scene and transport them to the hospital based on severity. What I'm saying is that just because someone didn't see any evidence of murder at the brief time the person was there does not mean that it didnt happen. 3-10 I just read the comments section and I want to point out @Rayze provided a link that debunks all 10 reasons listed on VT. If you dont mind Rayze, I'm going to direct the readers to the link you provided for myths 3-10 listed on VT. For one reason, I cannot prove or disapprove the Facebook or Twitter accusations based on the fact that: 1) I dont have either social media. 2) I dont have the power to delve into either large medias to find the exact date those statues were supposedly written. (https://www.metabunk.org...) This forum debunks the 10 assertions stated in VT and more. Conclusion Based on the facts provided by both me and Rayze (thanks btw) I have demonstrated that there are no supporting evidence to Pro's assertions. Not only did I disprove Pro's assertions, my rebuttal provided supporting facts from credible sources. Pro decided to state her assertions based on speculation. Additionally, disproving the VT article that is the base of Pro's assertions leads one to conclude that her reasonings are unsound and that I win this debate due to credibility. I am so sure that you have no more credible assertions that I will not partake in the last round.