The Christian God Does Not Exist

Logical Incoherence:Con actually affirms my point here. by saying " God cannot deny himself (2 Tim. 2 : "p1)An omnipotent god can perform all acts p2)An omnipotent god can't deny himself(which is an act)c1)True Omnipotence does not existc2)Beings defined as omnipotent don't exist. Good/ Bad: " That being said, whatever God considers "good" and "evil" is subject to his interpretation, not yours. If God sees it best for you to suffer in order to discover the fullest power of good in a world of evil then that is "good." Wow, I've never seen anybody argue god is a utilitarian before.In this case, god is actually a kind of celestial dictator.P1) good is whatever god wantsP2) Bad is which opposes god.P3)god can't do what he does not wantC) God is always good. This proposal of Divine Command Theory renders all morality completely trivial. If there is a tri-omni god, morality is so trivially that it does not exist.Also P3 renders god not omnipotent.Objection : Free will(II)P1) Free will is a prerequisite to being a moral agentP2) If an omniscient god exists, humans have no free will.C1) Humans are not moral agentsC2) Divine command theory is non-senseP1: Imagine an evil scientists who creates a robot to torture and kill people.The robot is programmed to do the acts and can't not do them. I would say the scientist is immoral, not the robot.P2: Problem Of Free Will(Non-gods):P1)An omniscient god knows the future.P2) An omniscient god can't be wrong.P3) An omniscient god can predict your actions and can't be wrong. P4)An omniscient god knows your actions.C1) You don't have free will. If an omniscient god exists, then there are no moral agents, and thus morality means nothing. And if morality means nothing, then omnibenevolence is negated.Free Will:Many disagree on what free will is, which is fine, but there is agreement on what free is not.If your actions can be predicted with 100% accuracy, then you don't have free will. Con says: "God voluntarily chooses to act upon his own actions. God can't change his own future not because of external factors, but because he chooses not to (Num. 23:19). This proves he has free-will." Nope, this does not help anything.P1) If your actions can be predicted with 100% accuracy, then you don't have free will.P2) An omnipotent god has free willP3) An omniscient god can know his actions with 100% accuracyC1) An omnipotent god can't be omniscient, because omniscience entails no free will, because then god could 100% predict his own actions(which means he also is not omnipotent, because then he can't predict his actions)C2) The only way a tri-omni god can have free will is if he does not have omnipotence or omniscience, thus no longer being tri-omniOmnibenevolence and freewill:P1) God must always act for the greater good, since he is omnibenevolent.P2) An omnipotent god can act in a way contrary to the greater goodC) Omnipotence and Omnibenevolence are incompatabile p1: con affirms this by saying " That being said, whatever God considers "good" and "evil" is subject to his interpretation, not yours. If God sees it best for you to suffer in order to discover the fullest power of good in a world of evil then that is "good."p2: P2 is true because an omnipotent god can peform any act.C) An omnipotent god can perform all acts, an omnibenevolent god can't perform acts that are contrary to the greater good, the two are contrary.Conclusion: The tri-omni god is painfully incoherent