Donald Trump's "Muslim Ban" is unconstitutional.

I will first respond to my opponents claims and then lace some observations I have noticed. My opponent, one doesn't clarify which article/quote Trump said that in. Regardless, I will answer their claims. My opponent doesn't seem to notice that there is a difference between a Muslim Ban, and a temporary ban, that Mr. Trump has placed. Like I said earlier, it it was a Muslim Ban, every Muslim on the Earth would be blocked from coming. Is that the case? Absolutely not. Therefore, the Muslim Ban has nothing to do with the quote. It's simply just a ban. My opponent seems to misunderstand what the 14th Amendment does. You don't have rights until you step on American soil. So the government can deny visas as they aren't issued in the United States. Now the only challenge remains the people who were already on a plane and were coming here. The answer to that as I already provided was about the United States Customs and Border Protection. They have the right to consider anyone inadmissible to the United States. Who controls the USCBP? The Department of Homeland Security. Who controls the DHS? John Kelly. Who does John Kelly answer to? President Donald J. Trump. The first priority of the President of the United States of American is to protect its citizens. The choice is yours, do you Americans first or people who you don't know. My President and I have chosen Americans. You can risk your house and your family, but my President and I will not. I have compassion for my family and my fellow Americans, it seems to me that you care more about the families of refugees and not your fellow Americans. Observations: -My opponent concedes that Trump has no conflict of interest(Ivanka argument) -My opponent concedes that the ban is not a Muslim Ban as they cannot explain why India and Pakistan aren't on the list, even thought they have high populations of Muslims -PRO concedes that Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Egypt are not a threat, and in doing so concedes that it is not a Muslim Ban -PRO concedes that the law I provided is legal and therefore is not unconstitutional -My opponent uses unreliable information in the form of outdated information to spread misleading information -My opponent frequently cherry picks their arguments specifically the argument about the text of the executive order. -My opponent concedes that Trump isn't favoring one religion over another -PRO concedes the argument about the United States CBP have the power to reject anyone over probable cause -My opponent concedes the argument about the 1st Amendment -My opponent concedes that Trump doesn't hate Islam, but hates Radical Islam -My opponent concedes that the Pulse shooter's father was influenced him -My opponent concedes that the Pulse shooter's supported Hillary, therefore supporting PRO's stance even though he was a Taliban admirer -My opponent concedes that Kuwait is also imposing a ban, and there is no outrage over that -My opponent concedes that the 7 countries have the right to be banned based on the data I provided -My opponent concedes that their protesting is flawed as there were no protests when Jews were banned -My opponent concedes that CNN is garbage Most of all, my opponent considers the lives of Americans to be worth less than the lives of the refugees. Donald J. Trump singlehandedly defeated the Democratic Party and the GOP Establishment. He beat the odds against the MSM and the political pundits who said he was going to lose. He fought through the numerous accusations flung at him. The reason why this happened is because the PEOPLE support him. The PEOPLE supported his ideas and his policies. And what is happening right now? He is keeping his promises he made to the American people. A President who prioritizes America first and who fulfills his promises. What more can we ask for? For all of the reasons I mentioned above, I strongly urge a CON ballot in today's debate. Thank You to my opponent for this Civil and timely debate and thank you to judges for reading. I hope y'all enjoyed.