I want to debate whether Jesus is the God of the Bible.

Real quick I want to rebut your use of 1 John 5:7. Consider the context of verses 1-6 before it. In verse one It states that Jesus was born. That means that Jesus had a beginning. God did not have a beginning. Verse 5 states the importance in in Faith in Jesus as the SON OF GOD. There is a clear distinction. When we get to verse 7 it isn't stated to contradict everything before it but to show that the 3 bear the same witness; that they all agree with each other. Consider Genesis 2:24 where it states that a man becomes one with his wife. They aren't the same person but it's to show how close the two should become. This understanding harmonizes with 1 John 5:7. I appreciate that you love Jesus. I love Jesus as well and I'm glad you decided not to take your life. The world is a very difficult and wicked place. Ephesians 6:12 describes to us the struggle we have as warfare; as Christians we have much to content with as Satan tries everything to tear us down spiritually. Don't give up the fight even when it gets difficult. 1 Peter 5:7 encourages us to throw our burdens and anxieties on God because God cares for us; he cares for each of us personally so that none of us should ever feel overlooked as if God doesn't notice our individual problems. Remember this. But also remember this, Acts 17:11 - These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. In speaking of the Christians in Borea Paul referred to them as more noble, why? They were receiving instruction directly from the apostles and yet they had the diligence of mind to check the scriptures to make sure what they were being taught was true. True to the scriptures. This is the example all Christians should follow. I have made a search of scripture and continually found that the word Trinity cannot even be found in the scripture nor does the idea of it harmonize with other basic Bible truths. You say I lack of evidence? Have you not read my arguments? I have provided numerous scriptures to support my arguments. Have you not noticed my citation of scripture after and during many of statements? I know its a long a read but I have, with much effort, tried to condense those arguments into the 10,000 character limit. I was able to do this by not directly quoting lengthy passages. The added benefit of doing this is to allow you to search your own translation of the Bible to confirm the scriptural foundations of my arguments in the language most comfortable to you. It seems, though, that you haven't read my arguments in their entirety and are only interested in advertising the religious platforms of other organizations through various hyperlinks instead of actually trying to have a debate. I hope this isn't the case and that you are capable of constructing your own arguments in your own words. Please go back and reread my arguments and check my citations, you have one more round to attempt to refute my use of scripture. For my final argument I want to share my personal experience. My family is very religious. My family has in the past provided land and financed the construction of the Church for the farming community where my grandmother lived. There are several Pastors in my family. Notably, One of my cousins went to school to train to become a Pastor as well. He had this habit of challenging me with Biblical contradictions he had discussed in his studies. And he would smile when I would return after researching the matter and defeat each one; resolving each one with other scripture to show that no contradiction existed. At one point, though, I asked him about a contradiction I found, the Trinity, and shared my research upon the scriptures. Because to me the Trinity made no sense and didn't Harmonize with the rest of the Bible. I will never forget what he told me. "You're right, it's a lie. There are a lot of church doctrines that are lies." I asked him why he wouldn't speak up about it. He told me because it isn't what people want to hear. He knew that if he wanted to work and make a living as a pastor he needed teach to the Trinity. My cousin, to this day, refuses to teach Church Doctrine. He decided the best message he can give as a Christian is to do good works, so he shipped off to India for his ministry of charitable acts. My cousin told me he would avoid teaching doctrines he knew where fake and just do good acts. Historically the Jews did not believe in the Trinity. The catholic encyclopedia acknowledges, "In Scripture there is as yet no single term by which the Three Divine Persons are denoted together." I learned the origin of the Trinity while studying in University. My teacher explained, and I am paraphrasing for brevity, that the Roman Emperor Constantine had decided that the Christian religion could be useful. That it was inconvenient to have his armies divided over about which roman god they marched under. It was common for people to come from cities dedicated to one particular deity and so he wanted to simplify the whole thing under Christianity. The Church loved it since the would experience increased influence and power. But there was one problem for Constantine, there was God and there was Jesus. He wanted to simplify so he organized the Council of Nicaea and had the religious leaders combine the God and Jesus in order for his armies to march under the banner of one religious Deity. Constantine was not a Christian at this time and the Bible had very little to do with this decision. All this from a history professor. He would later show that the doctrine of transubstantiation was an effort by the Catholic Church to prevent people from joining other Churches since only the Catholic Church could actually turn the bread and wine of the communion into the actual Flesh and Blood of Jesus. It was a cash grab and an attempt to secure the Churches power and influence. Later the Holy spirit would be added and scriptural translation would be flavored in order to support this doctrine. You see, much of the decisions of organized religions has to do with securing money, power and influence. The Trinity was born out of one such decision. It gave the Church the favor of the emperor and now it is ingrained in the minds of people less noble than the Boreans in Acts 17: 11. A people who no longer search the scriptures to see if what they are taught is true. I hope you are reading these arguments in their entirety. I would also like to see you give your own arguments rather than just post links to outside resources to make your arguments for you. I'm sure you are capable of speaking for yourself.