FIND ONE TOPIC AND DEBATE ME ON IT

Thank you for accepting the challenge of the debate. However the problem with your last argument is that you did not address any of my points from Round 1, which I have still yet to elaborate on. Therefore, more importantly, I will address the Bush "accomplishments" you've listed... and by the way, the Bush successes my opponent noted were plaigarized word for word and not cited. I thought this was debate.org, not copy-and-paste.com... but anyway! 1) You mentioned that Bush's law regarding partial birth abortion was "the most significant roll-back of abortion on demand since Roe v. Wade." I don't see that as an 'accomplishment' and in fact many liberals would see that as an infringement upon women's rights -- a complete atrocity. I reject this as being an 'accomplishment' because 57% of Americans support the original ruling (Source: ABC.com) 2) Bush's tax breaks for the wealthy were not without consequence; any democrat will be glad tell you how they negatively effected the important programs our tax dollars help to fund. Also, those tax cuts HARDLY even BEGIN to make up for the incredible damage that GWB has inflicted upon our economy. But I'll get to that later. 3) George W. Bush restored honor and dignity to the presidency? Oh, I'm sorry. I must've missed that. Was that when he was conspiring regarding the attacks on 9/11? Or perhaps blatantly LYING to the American public about al Qaeda being linked to Saddam Hussein in Iraq? (Source: The Pentagon!) I could go on, but this "debate" is pretty moot anyway so I'll refrain for now. 4) The No Child Left Behind Act is noted as a huge failure of the Bush Administration... one of many. Because this is the copy-and-paste debate, apparently, read here for why: ( http://www.timeoutfromtesting.org... ) 5) Here's a headline for you - "Opposing the international climate treaty the Unites States signed in 1997, President Bush and members of his administration have made misleading and erroneous comments." For the rest of the story, click here: http://www.nrdc.org... 6) I think the fact that you (or whomever wrote that) claim Bush "successfully executed two wars in the aftermath of 9/11/01: Afghanistan and Iraq" is the biggest joke of all in this whole "debate." Bush didn't execute anything -- he hasn't seen anything through, other than ordering an ILLEGAL WAR that alienates our allies, dissolved treaties, crushed our economy, raised the prices of oil... I mean he "successfully" killed millions of innocent Iraqi civilians (NOT terorists), thousands of American soldiers, and divided a nation in addition to watching his approval ratings reach all-time lows. Is that what you meant b success? Or what? Okay I think I'm done with this for now. I have a huge migraine. To re-cap for the readers/voters, my opponent challenged me to a debate claiming that I could choose the topic. I chose George W. Bush. In Round 2 my opponent refused to debate me on the topic at hand. In my rebuttal I convinced him to accept the challenge. In Round 3 my opponent provided a sloppy, incoherent opening statement followed by a plaigarized and uncited body. He also did not take note or refute any of what I said regarding Bush earlier in Round 1. I concluded the debate by refuting his points, and even if you don't agree, you can't deny that my arguments against his were a little more thorough or at least up to par with his. So who won? In my opinion, nobody. I think this is possibly my worst debate yet. However I still outperformed my opponent, and therefore deserve your vote. Thanks, and hopefully the next debate you read of mine will be a lot better :)