That the User Known as RoyLatham Should be Awarded with (At least) One Free Win

It seems interesting that a debater like Uchi accepted this. Obviously he doesn't know RoyLatham much, because RoyLatham definitely deserves at least one free win.This is the first time I'm using this style of debating, so it may be a bit strange to read this. I don't think anybody uses this strange style, lol.INTRODUCTION TO ROYLATHAM RoyLatham is a smart man, voted by most people as the smartest person on DDO. He participates in debates in virtually every topic imaginable (with the exception of gaming and fashion of course), and he has ended up in the Hall of Fame as a result of his deep thought in his comments, RFD's, and basically everything. But his awesomeness is still actually not the core of my argument for why RoyLatham should be awarded at least one free win.INTRODUCTION TO OLD DEBATING The times were very sad during the old days of DDO. In fact, just going back 5 years ago, a screenshot taken exactly 4 days before today (5 years ago, of course). As seen from http://web.archive.org..., DDO didn't have an opinion nor polls section. It had no nice front page with featured debates and all of that glory. My argument about how Roy deserves at least one free win involves a debate from 5 years ago. *Drumroll please*And the debate is....*More drumroll please*||||||||||||||||||||| http://www.debate.org...That's right, folks, it's "The US is in need of reindustrialization." I will explain more thoroughly later why Roy deserved to win this.INTRODUCTION TO THE MODERATORSAs far as we're concerned, there are only two active moderators on the site who seek to improve the site and try their best to do what's right.There's the good old brony Ore Ele And there's our excellently working Airmax1227 I have in fact long ago contacted them concerning this debate and the vote bomb. By ThejudgeisGod. Who gave all 7 points to himself. But he ff'd one round of the debate, so had it been fair voting from him, the score would have been 13:11. There is yet another votebomb (presumably from his friend) from The Categorial. If he had been voting fairly too, the score would have been 12:12, tied, assuming that their other points were rightfully and justifiably working. (And keep in mind that Roy was forgiveful and decided not to hog the conduct point to himself, which he could've easily justified because his opponent forfeited, making him the winner if we truly made the votes unbiased!!) Remember what I said about unfairness in the olden days? Yeah, judgeisgod is all about unfairness within this debate. INTRODUCTION TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS DEBATEThe moderators obviously care about justice. In addition, as I stated, Roy is an important member who we must care about. In fact, during that time where I tried to do RoyLatham justice, I accidentally misinterpreted Airmax's position in a forum thread, and he replied This shows that the moderators in fact really care about the debate I mentioned, it was just that they couldn't do anything about it and it would be awkward to do with all the coding needed, etc, etc. On such an old debate.I shall repeat this in a different wording just in case it's too confusing: Now, why do the moderators not choose to change such an obvious votebomb? The debate is much too old. It's too arcane. The site has changed much. I agree. That is right. This debate was 5 years ago, which is really old, and as a result updating it would not exactly work out. Therefore I contend an alternative solutionINTRODUCTION TO THE ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION/CONCLUSION TO MY CASENow, we know the moderators can easily manipulate the site. But I understand why they chose not to edit such a debate. Roy is famous, Roy is awesome, but the moderators just can't change such an old debate. As Airmax can verify, when I first asked him to delete Judgeisgod's votebomb for himself, he said he couldn't because the debate was too old and all that mumbo jumbo code stuff. Therefor we must do justice in a different way--we can let him gain a free win, and an elo addition too (with the substitution of his opponent's elo into the equation of course). Only by letting Roy gaining a free win can we be just, fair, and display what Debate.Org truly means and how much we care.Onto you, Uchi.