The Resurrection of Jesus is possible

First off i would like to say that i am a christian so i do believe in the resurrection, but after reading the pros points i believe that they are flawed. Point A: The fact that the apostles went out and spread the word of Christ does not have anything to do with proof of him resurrecting, and the thought of someone giving there life for something they truly believe in is a common idea. It's not like its the first time its happened or that it never happened again. In the ancient Greek times we can see this at the battle of Marathon. The hopolite soldiers went out to battle the mighty Persian army, and won, but when the Persians tried to sail around the Athenians sprinted back many miles in full gear to fight another battle for their city. We also see today stories today of soldiers jumping on a grenade, or radical Islamist blowing themselves up for their cause. My point is that people go to extreme lengths for their religion, country, family etc., even risking their own lives to do so. So the simple fact that the apostles risked there lives to preach the word of Christ proves nothing. In fact Romans commonly risked there lives praying in secret for their Christian beliefs. Point A proves does not prove that Jesus could have been resurrected. Point B: It is commonly known that the bible has been altered throughout the years it has been in this world. Catholic Priests have added and taken out verses from the bible. It has also been translated numerous times which can be cause for misconceptions and false translations. The bible would also be considered an extreme bias to this debate, and it can not be held as truth. There are also other religious texts on this earth, and based of the pros logic in his first argument, that would also make them true sense there are also numerous individual writings of them. They also do not mention Jesus in their books. So in that case the Resurrection of Jesus could not be possible. Point C: Pro presents here that because of how woman were treated in these times, and because a woman found Jesus, it must be true because who would admit that a woman was the one to find Christ the Almighty. This is extremely flawed! Woman during the Augustan era were actually treated fairly well. Unlike Greek times woman were allowed to divorce and speak there minds. During this time many woman were seen as equal to men. This simple fact throws out the entirety of pros point C. Pro has still not proven a possibility of a resurrection at this point. Point D: Pro shows again his/her lack of knowledge in history. First of Buddhism and Islam were not around at the time of the story of Christianity. This disproves that the bible had to have a Resurrection story, because of these other large religions. Plus Romans at the time commonly believed in the idea of several gods that had immortal life and slept with mortals.They also believed in stories of great heroes being resurrected as gods because of their great deeds they did in life. So the simple thought that Jesus was resurrected could not be a uncommon and unheard of idea during this time period. The apostles were risking their lives because they were preaching the ideas of there being one god, where as i have already stated that the Romans at the time believed in several gods. At many times Christians were just being killed because of an emperors hate for them, as we can see vastly in Nero and Caligula. The Pro has presented no facts or good philosophical reasoning for there to ever be a resurrection of Christ. Round goes to Con!