We cannot know reality without the Christian God

Philosophy is, The way that the mind works. Not what causes it to work. Philosophy addresses communication tactics, behavioural causes and consequences, and practical thinking. Philosophy does not address what makes thinking possible. The following examples are philosophies, not explanations for What allows us to (How) we think. "What allows us to think" is the debate am I correct? ? ?? [Your conclusion being that, " we do not need the Christian God in order for something within our reality to have the capacity to think?] Otherwise. I'll address the topic of Philosophy in this argument regardless. Logical Positivism: Cognitively Meaningful statements are only ones which have been empirically verified. {Empirically verified = that which follows a formal communication pattern which address the facts, and over look nothing of relevance as an attempt to disillusion the content of the discussion or lead to delusion.} Logical Positivism does not express What gives us Capacity to use Logical Positivism; and therefor does not express How we can know something without God. Logical Positivism does not disprove God, IN any way. You do not know what is beside me, you can't figure it out if I do not respond, and yet... It's there. Pragmatism: = Prophecy Does not express What enables us to use Pragmatism ~ How we know things. Rationalism: This did not express HOW we are capable of using reason. It simply states that you must use reason in order to Know something, and so you can prophecy, and come to conclusions without observation. Fact. These three philosophies however true, do not explain How we are Capable of intelligence. But only express what intelligence is. Empiricism: is not a philosophy, it is an idea, a concept or a " theory". Empiricism does not explain WHY you can feel, or why you can think. However knowledge does only come from the senses Intellect does not. Solipsism: is also not a philosophy but also is a "theory". The idea that only your mind exists IS literally delusional, and that is proven. I am not required to disprove Solipsism here. If you said the sky was magenta, I could simply disregard your claim and let that speak for itself. It however does not express how Solipsism has the capacity to be real. Constructivism: Constructivism is a concept. It explains the schematic of the brain. Knowledge However can only be true or it is not knowledge. I can know about Unicorns because the concept of a unicorn exists and the knowable facts applied to the fictitious creature are distinguishable. However, there is no indication that God is not a requirement for this capacity to be present here either. God: Omnipresent, - in all things; Physical, imaginary & theoretical. Omnipotent, - immune to predatory threats, and inheritor/possessor/recipient of all rewards and victories. All-knowing, - aware of the consequences and mathematical outcomes of all events within Knowable parameters. Merciful, - accommodating of potential for repentance and penance. Loving, - provider of all provisions. Jealous, - biased towards his greater prosperity, and holding enmity to a desolate profit. & Wrathful, - relentlessly moved to destroy that which obstructs his prosperity, even unto a greater desolation, to ensure that maximum potential is attainable, even if Maximum is now lower then a pervious Minor. These are the universal qualities of God which have been presented as the Nature of God in all cultures, eras and religions world wide. I am not talking about god, God. PS. Hinduism is a Henotheist religion, and only has one God, Greek mythology also is henotheist, and so is Norse, Egyptian, Tartar etc. These natures of God have been evaluated to be factual elements of Our Reality and the Entity which factually exists, and can only be associated within our Diction, Grammar and Vocabulary as being " Spiritual" (Unearthly: Not bound to restraints from an exterior force.). And that Is What God is. God is thus; Physics, Matter, Philosophy/theory, the laws of nature and morals, And all other aspects of reality. This unstipulable nature of God has been very thoroughly expressed, proven and exalted as True Wisdom since the beginning of recorded history unto the end, It is referred to as enlightenment ~ acknowledgement of reality in a HOLISTIC manner. Only selfish bigots, perverts, insolent brats, pompous fools, inconsiderate morons (moron meaning.. Google it. LOL), Spiteful mopes, and undignified shrewds Have ever denied God and not seen the wisdom in it, or lacked the efforts necessary to comprehend it. {all criminal justification, corrupt behaviour, insolent selfishness, pompous indignity is an act of spite towards God for Not expressing himself. Which is essentially blackmailing God.} BUT, Because God is defined as the Nature of Reality, and all that which supports it and is in effect the result of all actions, as well as being the prosperous ideology and imaginary concepts to ensue. GOD, which IS That God of Christianity IS Necessary to KNOW anything. As anything contrary to the truth is not knowledge. God is that truth by definition. God is that knowing in nature. He is the foundation of our senses according to scriptures definition of God. He presents reality, and is defined as THAT (the actual) force which establishes and sustains reality. THis is the historical application of the Term God, and when addressed Holistically it becomes even more Enlightening, Awesome, Exponentially Grandeur and entirely anti-Atheistic. God IS. However, although rambling about the 5th and 6th day of creation were Chatter. When the planet expanded from within itself on the Third Day of Creation because it was previously in darkness and nothing was molecularized because the perceived element of "Light" had yet to be present there, It left Geological Proof ~ which supports no contrary theory, concept or idea. It is even more-so evaluable as being true because of the validity of the second day, the First, and the fourth {thus presenting enough scientifically verifiable evidence to evaluate the 5th and 6th day with confidence and understand a spontaneous creation of DNA {DNA requires a cell to replicate or sustain itself, and a Cell cannot exist without DNA. But both being a part of the same spontaneous creation is factually logical. Where as anything contrary is Factually lacking evidence or scientific method.} } SO, because Creation is Proveable. The Christian GOD is determined to be the Only way we CAN actually Think. I anticipate your reply. Please read this argument twice prior to responding to ensure you are aware of my statements. I also request that you use the statement section to discuss anything which seems like a riddle. It is good to from an accord [indicating that fi we do not agree, we at least understand each other] prior to continuing forward.