God does not exist.

In the name of Allah Most Gracious Most Merciful. A sad situation: Its sad like a Sales Representative Pro is trying to inspire his audience with his words and get High rank for His Product "His Paper" as I mentioned Earlier Pro was much more interested in getting "His Paper" evaluated rather then the Existence of God, for a Truth Seeker "Existence of God" is a much more bigger concern then proving his points right and winning a debate [because "WHAT IF THERE EXISTS A GOD!"] so here he is more concerned to attract Voters then Seeking truth which defies the cause of Debate according to me and I was not Justifying anything wrong, what I was saying was for a Seeker of Truth it merely matters if he is seeking "Evidence Beyond Preponderance" what the length of argument is. Wrong Perception: It was a clear wrong Perception of my statement .. If you scroll up I said "IF HYPOTHETICALLY scientist say that water is not prime constituent of water no Muslim will believe it becauseThere is no statement in Quran which is against any scientific fact (though you will find many on Internet [Debate with me if you think that is true]) so We as a Muslim Regard Quran the Highest Regard because there is not a single false statement in Quran" I have not made any challenge against the Logic which Pro give because that is True according to Quran(though that might be not true according to hypothesis and theories) so I have no problem with that. I dont think anyone will find it illogical to "Reject Scientific Hypothesis or Theories" because they are not proven yet! and we have +ves and -ves about that particular thing so its upto ones perception if he accepts or rejects that theory! Pros whole argument was based on the approach that "Theist try to prove God with Big Bang Cosmology" which should have been made clear in the first round. Since He stated no context in which we will be debating the Existence of God. So He Choose Cosmology I Choose Quran. Each to Its Own? There was no binding to Prove God Only by Proving Con's Points wrong. "and My claim that Pro is only looking for Evaluation of His Paper in the Market can be easily Justified since he has been using the same article in previous debate with someone else http://goo.gl... " Yes I rejected that argument because Its not My cup of tea? I have my own approach to Prove God Con had His as previously told no one was abide to any rule that he has to use Big Bang Cosmology to prove his Point. so According to Me I do not consider Argument of Relativity same as you do not consider Quran for you. so we had to come to a command point where we can debate. I stated those facts from Scientists as an Evidence that As Quran states 1500 Years ago about the Universe is what today believe! Conclusion of Both is Same! that there must have happened something like "Big Bang" that means may be scientists have not got the right way to explain it though they are trying with the help of Eq. of Relativity and other theories but there is not discrimination that Something like "Big Bang" has happened or Not! Hence What Quran says 1500 Years ago is same what Scientists are Trying to Prove Today! ( Though their method to prove it is correct or not (might be uncertain) on one side its the most strongly supported Model of Beginning of Universe but discoveries are not stopped there.) Hence My Point that as Quran states that something like "Big Bang" has happened is accurate according to our Results of our Today's studies! ASSUMPTIONS and Half Quotation: Pro takes half of my argument and distorts it to according to his need to prove his argument true that is Truly something Unjust! I said yes! that I also do not believe in The Series of Events going backward thts absurd !But I also said that There has to be an end to it!THERE IS A CREATOR BEHIND IT THERE IS SOMEONE WHO CREATED IT INITIATED IT..My Argument has been distortedIts very illogical if you put the Beginning like this.. But it is very logical to put it like... FURTHER REBUTTALS:Pro Claims that I did not said anything about "There is no reason to think that ‘’god’’ as defined in R1 exists due to Quran"I think I presented the Case Very Clearly.. Holy Quran is the Book of Allah and There is not a Single Statement which is Against Science. There are Signs which speak about The Scientific facts. not one not two but Hundreds! I AGREE THAT THERE HAS BEEN MYTHS ABOUT SUN MOON UNIVERSE SINCE THOUSANDS OF YEARS BUT!How can Muhammad (PBUH) can only Pick and Choose Only The Correct Statements out of Hundreds of Myths?How can Muhammad (PBUH) be so sure that: Moon's Light is reflected light? (10:5) All Heavenly Bodies Rotate and Revolve (21:33) There is Ozone as a Protective Layer Above us? (21:32) When Sweet Water Body Mixes with Salty There is a Barrier between them (25:53) (Google:Estuary) About Detailed Description of Water Cycle in Whole Quran? (http://goo.gl...) That Embryo is Leech-Like ? as Dr. Winston Tells us?(23:14)(Video) http://www.youtube.com... That There are 3 layers major layers in which fetus lies? (39:6) That Finger Prints are Unique to Everyone? (75:4) Here I have stated 8 Scientific Statements from Quranout of thousands of statements lets take 10 only!The Possibility of All 10 the statements: to be guess work/poetic statement(which came out true) to be a luckily copied myth (which came out true today) only doing this simple math we get the Possibility this to be guess work or luckily copied from past which came out to be truth is0.2% for only 10 statements and There are 100s! in QuranNOW I ASK YOU? HOW IS THERE TO TELL MUHAMMAD (PBUH) TO ONLY CHOOSE CORRECT OUT OF SEVERAL OTHER MYTHS??? WHO IS THERE ALWAYS TO WISPER IN HIS EARS THAT"ALL THEORIES ARE FALSE ONLY MOON HAS ITS OWN LIGHT""ALL MYTHS ARE FALSE ONLY WATER CYCLE IS LIKE THIS""ALL STORIES ARE FALSE SUN AND MOON ARE IN ORBITS""ALL ARE ASSUMPTIONS FETUS IS LIKE THIS IN WOMB"..100s OF TIME!HOW CAN A PERSON'S GUESS WORK OR COPYING FROM PAST BE ALWAYS RIGHT?I LEAVE IT TO THE READERS... THEY CAN BETTER DECIDE WHO WAS TELLING MUHAMMAD(PBUH) 100s OF TIMES THAT OUT OF ALL THE POSIBILITES ONLY THIS ONE IS CORRECT!NOW PRO HAS WITH HIS SELF ASUMPTIONS AND TRICKS DROPPED ALL MY CLAIMS.I ARGUE ARE 20-30 TRANSLATORS OF WORLD'S SECOND LARGEST RELIGION and FASTEST GROWING RELIGION ARE MAKING FOOL OUT OF PEOPLE BY WRITING FALSE TRANSLATIONS? IS THAT POSSIBLE IN TODAY'S CRITIC AGE? SINCE PRO IS TOTALLY UNFAMILIAR WITH ARABIC HE DOES NOT KNOWS THAT IT HAS ROOTS AND ALL THE MEANINGS ARE VALID! ALL ARE TRANSLATED TO THIER RESPECTIVE TRANSLATION!QURAN'S TRANSLAITONS ARE CHECKED BY EMINENT MUSLIM and NON-MUSLIM SCHOLARS BEFORE PUBLISHING! ALL AUTHNTIC TRANSLATIONS HAVE TO PASS THE TEST TO BE CONSIDERED TRUTH AND I AM PRESENTING 41 TRANSLATIONS. And the Rule while we Study Comparative Religions is If "Any of the meaning of The Scripture Gives Sense! is Reasonable! is Logical! is not out of context that is considered the right translation" ! Agreed by whole world.there is no much space left to say more.moreover I will not present any new arguments since Pro will not be there to answer them. I will look forward from him to debate about Islam and Quran and Science and we can come to a better conclusion.As for Now. Pro with his self assumption wrote down that I have not replied to his arguments where as I separately answered almost 90% of the argument its space which limits me to speak.CONSLUSION:Quran is the Book of God. A way of Life for those who seek truth and peace! Its not a book of science but a book of signs for those who seek truth you will nor find detailed description of the scientific facts and E=MC^2but there are sufficient signs to Prove its validity! and Prove that This is The True Word of God. Allah has written down things in it which 1500 years ago no one could have written! There have been 100s of Scriptures on Earth but when you combine them with Today's Science They fail to pass the test of truth! Like Bible and Buddha's teaching and Hindu Scriptures but when to bring them together to pass the test of Time and meet today's age of Science they Fail a big time! Allah says in Quran:"Do they not ponder the Quran! If it were revealed from a source other than Allah, they would have found it abounding in discrepancies and variations."The Purpose of Quran is Guidance for AllIt Indeed, We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], the Book in truth so you may judge between the people by that which God has shown you. And do not be an advocate for the deceitful. And seek forgiveness of God. Indeed, God is ever Forgiving and Merciful. to Make rational human being believe that this is a Rational Book It contains the facts of science which are proven true Today!I pray for the readers that they may seek the truth.If anyone would like to debate regarding it to Me He is Most welcomed in This debate the approach of Pro was different then mine so I could not elaborate My claims completely!"Say, If God had so wished, I would not have recited it to you, nor would He have brought it to your knowledge. Indeed, I have spent a whole lifetime among you before it came to me. How can you not use your reason?" (10:16)Muhammad PBUH was known famous in his ENEMIES as *THE TRUSTWORTHY* He never ever lied to anyone in his whole life.not a "SINGLE LIE" is reported from This Great Man of History.How can He make up such false claims? I am working on psychological any al sis of Islamic History I would look forward to put a debate on it if Pro or anyone else Wills.Surely, in the creation of the heavens and the earth, in the alternation of the night and the day, in the sailing of the ships through the ocean for the profit of mankind, in the rain which Allah sends down from the skies, with which He revives the earth after its death and spreads in it all kinds of animals, in the change of the winds and the clouds between the sky and the earth that are made subservient, there are signs for rational people. (2:282)