It is more probable that God exist than that God does not exist

I would first like to thank my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as well as thank my opponent for accepting the debate on such a critical issue. C.S Lewis has said, "Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important." [1] My first argument is the basic kalam cosmological argument: P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause P2: The universe began to exist Therefore, the universe has a cause. We notice that the two premises are not religious at all. The fact that the universe began to exist can be found in any astrophysics and cosmology text book. This premises can be shown true for a few reasons. First: If the universe is infinite, then an infinite number of past events had to occur. This is obviously false because infinity is not an actual thing but rather just an idea. David Hilbert, possibly the greatest mathematician of the 20th century, said, "the infinite is nowhere to be found in reality. it neither exist in nature nor provides a legitement basis for rational thought. The role that remains for the infinite to play is solely that of an idea." For example, what is infinity minus 10? Infinity plus 2? Mathematically you get self contradictory answers. Also Stephen Hawking (physicist) said, "Almost everyone now believes that the universe, and time itself, had a beginning at the Big Bang." [2] Since everything that begins to exist has a cause and the universe began to exist, we must look to see what the cause has to be. The cause would have to be an abstract object such as numbers or a personal mind. The personal mind would have to outside of space and time, immaterial, personal and powerful. It cannot be an abstract object because they cannot cause anything. The personal mind would have to be outside space and time and be immaterial in order to be logically coherent. Anthony Kenny (agnostic philosopher): "(A proponent of the big bang) theory, at least if he is an atheist, must believe that matter came from nothing and by nothing." [3] We know this cannot be true because out of nothing, nothing comes. My next argument will be the ontological argument: 1: It is possible that a maximally great being (God) exists. 2: If it is possible that God exists, he exists in some possible world. 3: If God exists in some possible world, He exists in every possible world. 4: If God exists in every possible world, He exists in the actual world. 5: Therefore, God exists in the actual world 6: Therefore, God exists 7: Therefore, a maximally great being exists. When philosophers talk of possible worlds, they mean they way things could have been. There is nothing logically incoherent about unicorns. Therefore, unicorns exist in some possible world, but not the actual world. There is nothing logically incoherent about a maximally great being, therefore he exists in a possible world. Since God is, by definition a maximally great being, and exists in a possible world, he exists in all possible worlds. The argument flows to the conclusion that a maximally great being exists from there. In conclusion I have shown that the kalam cosmological argument shows there needs to be a creator of the universe. Second, I have shown that the ontological argument concludes that a maximally great being exists. I look forward to hearing my opponents arguments and rebuttal. Thank you Sources: [1] http://www.brainyquote.com... [2] Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose, The Nature of Space and Time, The Isaac Newton Institute Series of Lectures (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), 20. [3] Anthony Kenny, The Five Ways (New York: Schocken, 1969), 66.