God exists

=Defending my Arguments=1. Something ExistsMy opponent claims the following..." If nothing existed before universe it follows that god didn't exist either."Lucky when I accepted this debate you claimed that the god I had to prove had to have the power of omnipotence. Omnipotence, the power to do anything, literally means that god can do anything. This even means god could've created himself.I also meant in that situation that god was the only thing that had existed and he then commenced to create the universe. 3. Gödel's ontological argumentDespite me posting it on a pdf document the argument, it still stands. Get over it.I am also afraid your other rebuttal on this is wrong. The article states the proof was logically proven, however it also shows that computers can help advance science. If you don't believe me look at these quotes" Using an ordinary MacBook computer, they have shown that Gödel's proof was correct" (Knight)" Two scientists have formalized a theorem regarding the existence of God penned by mathematician Kurt Gödel. But the God angle is somewhat of a red herring -- the real step forward is the example it sets of how computers can make scientific progress simpler" (Knight)Source: http://www.spiegel.de...As you can see, they did solve Gödels proof, proving god is real. However they also use this to show how computers can make scientific progress simpler. The real problem is my opponent only looked at one part of the story.4. Watchmaker ArgumentMy opponent states..."I think the answer is obvious - evolution."I figured you meant evolution, however you ask me to elaborate on every thing so I figured I would do the same.I also do accept the evolution theory and I believe god used it as a tool to form modern life. 7. JesusFirst off, 500 witness saw the ascension, not the resurrection (as you state). I will then argue over the resurrection because of your claim of this. Next, I will use the the Gospel of Luke in my argument. before we start discussing this I want to show you a quote concerning Luke himself..."Luke is an accurate, credible historian. He has been proven over and over again by scholars to be an extraordinary historian. Luke 1:1-4 tells us how he went about his gathering evidence and evaluating it." Source: http://www.abideinchrist.com...Luke, as you can see is a credible historian, and the Gospel of Luke discusses the birth, life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus Christ. Here is Luke 1:1-4 (The section the quote discusses) that shows us he has carefully investigated when writing his gospel..."Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught" (Luke 1:1-4)As we can see Luke carefully investigated and verified everything he wrote, he investigated when writing his story about Jesus Christ, making it much more credible. Yes his writings were in the bible, however the bible is a collection of 66 books/written works, made by 40 different writers, not just one big story. It is like a magazine, which is a collection of articles and illustrations, If you believe one article is wrong, does that disprove the rest of the articles? Not at all. Also when looking for information about Jesus, take this quote in mind..."Jesus lived over 2000 years ago. He is an ANCIENT figure from history, and there are some things that we need to remember about historical figures and events from this period of time:1. There are amazingly few manuscripts of ANY text written during Jesus" time2. Historians of this period wrote amazingly little about religious figures anyway3. Jesus was active for an amazingly short period of time (just three years)4. Jesus ministered in an amazingly remote corner of the Roman Empire" Source: https://www.biblegateway.com...Despite these drawbacks, I have luckily found evidence outside of the bible, from the historian Phlegon.""Jesus, while alive, was of no assistance to himself, but that he arose after death, and exhibited the marks of his punishment, and showed how his hands had been pierced by nails." (Origen Against Celsus, Book 2, Chapter 59)This quote shows Jesus have resurrected from the dead. Here is a couple of other quotes if you are interested.https://www.biblegateway.com...My Opponent also states..."Also it's worth notice that resurrections were quite common back then (2 Kings 13:21)"I'm afraid one resurrection in between the creation of the earth and 30-36 AD doesn't exactly make it common. These were centuries apart and not even in the same testaments. He also revived when he touched the bones of Elisha, a very faithful servant of the lord, the lord then did bring the man to come back to life. Because these resurrections weren't common, this argument holds no water.=Rebuttals=1. Problem of informationFirst off, I don't believe the universe was created in 6 days. How do we tell time? By the Sun. During the days of creation, the sun was not created until day 4. because of this you could not tell time, so a day could've been however long god wanted it to be. Also god was the only one around then to measure time. So tell me how long is god's day? It is most likely different then our days.If talking about the creation of the universe is guessing, then it's pretty ironic it is one of the first things mentioned in the bible.As for the contradictions...Anti Scientific Claims - Most of your verses are Metaphorical, also just talking about holding earth, also in the others the four corners of the earth means the edges of the middle east and surrounding nations, also know the bible was written by humans not god.About your water argument, go and look at the argument about days above, god's days could be a very long time resulting in the earth to cool. Okay once again god didn't write the bible, or have anything to do with the creation of it. Also know some of the time men put in what they believed instead of what they knew about god, and his ideals. This also results in some of your contradictions. God didn't whisper into the authors ears what to write.Also none of the "other commandments" were on the tablet god gave to Moses, not making them apart of the commandmentsIf I answered all of you bible contradictions, I would run out of characters, but once again know god didn't write the bible, humans did, and often times laws of the land were written on it.2.Problem of evilAnimal suffer..."When humans fell from grace in the Garden of Eden, all of creation fell from grace with them. In other words, all of the created universe suffers from Man’s sin." Source: http://www.aggiecatholicblog.org...Essentially we screwed up big time. We were give one rule and disobeyed it. Everyone suffers. And like a father punishes a son, god must punish us.As with human suffering...You are now mixing up my words. Rich people who don't share with the poor, causes suffering, and for them to suffer, starve, and die. Also whose to say Adam and Eve don't have a soul?I don't think your arguments still stand. I end by rebuttals here, and sign off for this round.Vote Pro!Sources1. http://www.spiegel.de...2. http://www.abideinchrist.com...3. http://www.aggiecatholicblog.org...4. The Bible5. The works of the historian Phlegon.6. https://www.biblegateway.com...