Evolution is real.

Your explanation of Darwinism (Darwin theory of evolution) is partly correct, while some of it is what most people assume while not checking facts. Lets take your first example "More individuals are produced each generation that can survive." This is a tricky one to answer because there are many, many species in the world, about two million we've identified as of December 2015. While in a few cases this is correct, there are also many other cases where it isn't. For example, and I am going to prove this one theory, lets say that you have a species of rats. If you have two rats who produce, lets say ten of their own in four months, that means there are 10 additional rats to have offspring. Now lets say the rat population is hit with a plague. The original two rats die off, and an additional eight of the ten offspring are killed too. Lets also say that one of the offspring have a genetic mutation, while the other doesn't but just got lucky. The two offspring that weren't killed go on to reproduce. The genetic mutation in the one rat's DNA allowed it to survive, and be able to pass this trait to its offspring. The mutation may have given the rat a better immune system, maybe more white blood cells, but that isn't the point. Now that the two survivors reproduce, the mutated gene gets mixed in with the non-mutated, "original" genes. This also means that there is now a chance of more offspring of the two survivors to be immune. Now, lets say again, that there are ten offspring produced by the two rats. The chances of the offspring having a genetic mutation is higher, which means more rats will be able to survive. Say the same plague comes and kills off, the rats again. Because there is a greater number of immune offspring, now only six of the ten die, rather then eight. This eventually repeats itself, with the number of immune increasing. Now on to your second statement, about how "Homosapiens in Alaska would be different than people in Brazil, but in reality, they are the same anatomy wise." Yes, they are anatomically similar, but that is only if you look at how the body is made (bones, organs, etc). One prime example of the difference between people whose families have lived in Brazil and other tropic regions their entire lives. people who have lived in Alaska is skin color. This isn't to be racist whatsoever, but the skin color of a human can tell where the person has lived, and how their previous generation evolved to be best suited to that environment. The chemical in skin that changes the color is called Melanin. Melanin is what allows some humans to be very dark in skin, such as those living in central Africa, and some to be very light, such as those living in Alaska and Canada. One extreme difference you can tell when living in these two places is the intensity and duration of sunlight throughout the year and seasonal cycle. People living near the Equator, like people in Africa and Brazil, tend to have darker skin. The darker the skin of a human, the more melanin in their bodies. Now time for a little history lesson (trust me this ties into the debate). A long time ago, around 1.5-2.5 million years ago, all humans were only from one common ancestor. This ancestor lived in central Africa, we believe in Ethiopia along the central-eastern coast, around the Red Sea. The "humans" then had very thick hair, so their skin was light and needed little melanin. But as temperatures increased, we EVOLVED and lost our hair, exposing our skin. After many generations of the humans reproducing, the skin eventually turned darker. Then, when the first homosapiens appeared around 100-200 thousand years ago, we began to migrate out of Africa, into Europe, Asia, and the Americas. The migration brought us to different types of light intensity, so in order to survive we needed to evolve. Now the evolution of skin color is important. The darker the skin, the more UV rays and Vitamin D is being absorbed into skin. People with fairer skin, usually those who live in places further from the Equator, have evolved to use less Vitamin D because there is less coming from the sun onto the Earth in those places (http://genetics.thetech.org... - source). They don't need too much because their environment doesn't have that much. People in the Equator did not evolve their levels of Melatonin in the skin as much as people in say Europe or Alaska because the sun was intense and there was much more Vitamin D. Darker colors, as we all know (hopefully) absorb more heat, faster. The same goes with Vitamin D. People with dark skin absorb more Vitamin D because where they come from has more Vitamin D in the environment, so they need more. Lastly, new breeds of animals can be "made." It's called breeding. If a Lion and a tiger mate, they can create a Liger or Tion (depending on the gender of the Lion and Tiger that mate). A zebroid is made when a zebra and any kind of horse mate. This doesn't relate to evolution because there is no evolving involved in this process. It's just mating of two common species. We also can trait our genes (DNA) back with many animals, such as apes, and find that we came from a common ancestor. In fact, every animal, reptile, fish, insect, or whatever came from a common ancestor. It is believed to be some kind of bacteria.