Banning Muslims From Entering U.S.A Is Great Idea

Pro's arguments are ridiculously weak, pathetic and baseless. I will counter his arguments one by one- Pro, in the second paragraph gives examples of attacks around the globe that had RADICAL MUSLIMS at work. he says- the Paris shooting(2015)- In Paris Saint- Quentin- Fallavir attack(2015)- In France Port de Vincennes siege(2015)- Paris, France Out of 5 of his given examples,ONLY 2 have occurred in America and other 3 in FRANCE ARGUMENT-1- In this debate we are talking about AMERICA and not about FRANCE, I think . IT clearly shows Pro doesn't have any attacks left in AMERICA to list , hence he is including FRANCE also. VOTERS-Pro is going out of CONTEXT every time. - 1st DRAWBACK in PRO'S argument. But I will list some of the mass shootings by RADICAL CHRISTIANS in AMERICA (NOT in FRANCE, VOTERS) recently- Attacks and shootings- 1-Colorado Spring, 2-Rose burg Ore, 3-Charleston, 4- Isla Villas, 5- Washington D.C., 6- New town, 7- Aurora, 8-Oak Creeks, Oak Land, and many more. total dead- 91. http://timelines.latimes.com... In para- 3- PRO is saying "Orlando shooting may have been a combined but then also the shooter was a RADICAL MUSLIM." ARGUMENT 1- I never denied that but those who assist terrorists and "work with him"are also terrorists. Once again PRO is only listing ORLANDO shootings. 2- Why only one RADICAL MUSLIM is being focused upon, why not others who were involved. 3- Concrete facts would be found by one reading the given source that the shooter was assisted heavily. BUT there are NO PROVES that ISIS was involved in the attack or they guided OMAR MATEEN. http://yournewswire.com... In para-4 PRO says that it never proves that it was an insider job ARGUMENT- 1- BUT the evidences and facts prove it.(read my source VOTERS to get clear IDEA). It only shows that - PRO is NOT WILLING to accept the truth. para-5- ARGUMENT- 1- Yes, his family were immigrants but they immigrated to U.S.A. in 1980s and not recently. So a MUSLIMs BAN policy would have worked then BUT NOT NOW. Para-6- ARGUMENT- 1- YES the media is lying because they are only focusing on one person and not the whole issue as i said above. 2- President OBAMA and Hilary Clinton are hinting that it may have been an insider job and are OPPOSING Trump's banning Muslims policy. https://www.theguardian.com... 3-Donald Trump and Pro are both fine with mass shootings unless they are not perpetrated by MUSLIMs. My reason - U.S.A had already experienced 132 mass shootings in 2016 till Orlando but nobody reacted till the 132nd, but as soon a MUSLIM got involved, suddenly Donald Trump seems to be concerned about the killings and forms his Ban Muslim policy. WHY? http://www.vox.com... POINT-1- by PRO- Argument- 1- It's NOT FALSE VOTERS. NON Muslims- killed 158, Muslims- killed 49(Orlando) in 2016 in AMERICA. My source- http://www.vox.com... 2- PRO gave a global report-"Muslims killed 10,125 in 2016 which is again OUT OF CONTEXT, Since we are only focusing on U.S.A. DRAWBACK-2. So final reports- Muslim killed- 49 in America in 2016, right? OK, moving on- 4- Radical Muslim attacks are done for religious purposes but Orlando attacks (which is the ONLY SO CALLED ATTACK by Muslim that PRO is referring EVERY TIME) are still in argument that whether done for religious purpose, mental illness, or was it related to Gay(sexuality) issues. So don' conclude VOTERS. https://www.theguardian.com... 5- But since shootings happened in a gay night club maybe Sexuality (GAY) would have been the reason because if only Religious motive was there then why did shooter choose a Gay club. https://en.wikipedia.org... 6- Even if CHRISTIANS attacks are not religiously motivated BUT then also people ARE KILLED right? and that too in more numbers than by Muslims. POINT-2- by PRO- Argument- 1- PRO doesn't know what is a conspiracy theory. Let me explain- It is a theory based only on believes and not on concrete evidences but Orlando shootings is NOT conspiracy because there are solid evidences and proofs as I said above- refer my link VOTERS. POINT-3- by- PRO- Argument- already made above. POINT-4-by-PRO- Argument- 1- Most of the terrorist attacks that PRO listed are not even done in U.S.A. (said above) 2- PRO has given 1 example of Boston bombings out of the 2 terrorists attacks in America but that was done in 2013, right? So, VOTERS PRO is a hypocrite who doesn't want list and data from 2014 but to prove his own point has taken one from 2013. 3- PRO till now you have given just 1 example after 2014 in AMERICA. Give recent examples of Muslim attacks other than which you have told till now, please. 4- I have given examples from 2016 till 2012 in my first argument, cos I believe 2103 and 2012 don't have MUCH difference. 5- OKAY, VOTERS if we talk about 2016 then I have already given the actual number with source, which proves that Muslim attack has only been 1 out of the 133 shootings in 2016 in U.S.A. https://www.thereligionofpeace.com... http://www.vox.com.... POINT-5-by PRO- Argument- 1- I never said to kick out the CHRISTIANS but take other security measures. POINT-6-by PRO- Argument- I have already said it isn't a conspiracy theory as said by PRO and many other organisations were involved and not just a RADICAL MUSLIM was involved. POINT-7-para-1-by PRO- Argument- 1-In 2016 there have been 132 shootings by NON MUSLIMs and only 1 by MUSLIM (Orlando), and this is NOT OUT of conspiracy theories. VOTERS, PRO is LYING . That theory is only to prove other organisations were at work. BUT these numbers are actual and FACTS. VOTERS see for your self- https://www.thereligionofpeace.com... http://www.vox.com.... I by mistake typed 75, SORRY. PRO, i request you to give YOUR SOURCES about the number of shootings in 2016 by Muslims. Don't counter my FACTS without a SOURCE. This is NOT the spirit of debate. PRO quoted- "in general there were 10125(2016) killed" - Again PRO is going out of context and framing global reports VOTERS. POINT-7-para-2-by PRO- Argument- 1- PRO says that mass shootings are happening because of MUSLIMs which is RIDICULOUS as I have given you the ACTUAL figures. Out of 133 only 1 mass shooting has happened because of MUSLIM. PRO is WRONG and has very poor ANALYZING skills. POINT-7-para-3- by PRO- Argument- 1- It is not at all an exaggeration, because Muslims have killed only 37 Americans since 9-11 attacks till 2014(according to a study by University of North Carolina) http://www.thedailybeast.com... and in 2015 there have been 3 attacks by Muslims in U.S.A. killing a total of 22 https://en.wikipedia.org... and in 2016 the Orlando shooting killed 49. So, It can be concluded that since 9-11 attacks, MUSLIM terrorists have only killed 108 Americans till 2016, which means every year on an average they kill 7 Americans. Also out of that 80% are AMERICAN CITIZENS only and 20% are immigrants http://www.vox.com... which makes the average killing per year by MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS- 1. I have my sources ready PRO. DO YOU? 2-PRO quotes-"Con says" MUSLIMs have killed only 37 Americans since 9-11 attack", voter we both know this is false, let me state again it was a conspiracy THEORY not fact!" ARGUMENT- 1- PRO is such a RIDICULOUS person VOTERS. He has said the above statement without a backup source. SO, VOTERS, HOW on earth can you believe him, that the numbers are not fact but a conspiracy? This 37 killed study has been done by University in U.S.A. only. (see links). 2- Everywhere PRO has said that everything is a conspiracy, BASELESSLY. 3- PRO, If you say so, then GIVE your SOURCES. or DON'T you DARE to blindly counter these TRUTHS, just to win the debate. FINAL Argument- WHY it is a bad idea to BAN MUSLIMS to enter America. Argument- Any Idea is bad if it has more cons and less pros, right VOTERS? OK, So, MUSLIM TERRORISTS form just 6% of all terrorists in U.S.A. rest 94% are of other religion mainly CHRISTIANITY.(source given previously) Muslims have killed a total of 108 Americans till 2016 since 9-11 and average yearly killing by an IMMIGRANT is only 1, as calculated above. And every year 100,000 Muslims immigrate to America NOT FOR FUN (as again BLINDLY quoted by PRO) but to do work, also hundreds have to come in and out of America on regular basis for work. So banning Muslim immigrants- - may save life of 1 american yearly but ruin and disturb lives of 100,000 and lakhs of Innocent Muslims, SINCE if they are out of work, how will they survive? Also, If a RADICAL wants to enter U.S.A. he will form a fake passport with fake country of birth and also will disguise himself, hence the U.S. authorities will never know that he is from which part of the world actually. Now you see voters, why it's such a dumb idea. RADICALS can enter after the BAN also, so what's the use. Also, Pro is fine with risking lives of many Americans in Muslim countries( 50000 in U.A.E alone) just to save 1 life in U.S.A. Voters now you see, the BAN has only DEMERITS and not a single MERIT, so it's definitely a very bad and pathetic idea I request PRO to counter all my ARGUMENTS from TOP to BOTTOM(full article) - with SOURCES, not blindly - don't give global reports but be in U.S.A. only - in points In all my arguments I am speaking on the basis of FACTS, EVIDENCES, and sources but Pro all the time is just speaking his mind as he has no sources to support them.