Forced circumcision of older minors practiced in many Asian, African and Muslim countries is a crime

Before I start, I'd like to give light to definitions for the readers and close the palpable gap my foe missed out. Any objections should be discussed in the comments. Crime- an illegal act for which someone can be punished by the government (Merriam-Webster) Circumcision- a surgical removal of the foreskin from the human penis (Wikipedia) Organ- any part of the body that has function (Merriam-Webster) I'll be pointing my opponent's multifarious illogical, unsubstantiated, fallacious statements, offer my rebuttals, and, state my arguments. Clearly, my opponent hasn't sticked with the resolution, moving away from core ideas. However, Pro has stated harms circumcision entails. So, it would be my duty to refute them, however distant it is from the resolution. Rebuttals #1 "Most of the boys are circumcised by illiterate traditional circumcisers making the procedure nothing but a physical damage & not a medical procedure." This is a bare and baseless assertion. Everyone who wants to be circumcised go to doctors who are expertly knowledgeable and skillful in this craft and there are hospitals (I'll put YOUR EXAMPLES ON ALL CAPS :D) that cater this type of surgeries such as: A. PHILIPPINES (All of the regions in Philippines: Luzon, Visayas, Mindanao) 1. Medico Global-Medical and Skincare Clinic 2. St. Luke's Medical Center 3.Cebu Doctor's University Hospital 4. Ricardo Limso Medical Center 5.Chong Hua Hospital B. Muslim Areas (Uganda, BANGLADESH) 1. Kibuli Hospital 2. Apollo Hospitals Dhaka 3. Shish Hospital C. AFRICA 1. McCord Hospital 2.Cosmetic Clinic These hospitals have advanced, professional, skillful doctors that provide MEDICAL PROCEDURES to folks who want to be circumcised, and they're clearly far from ILLITERATE. I could surf the Internet for more hospitals that give professional and safe surgeries, but I think I made my point. #2 "Most of the boys are circumcised forcibly against their will that is a human rights violation. In our opinion, this is a crime under existing law. " Again, a bare assertion. This generalization of young boys coerced to the point of circumcision bears no cold, hard facts and evidences. Since they are at a young age, parents carry the burden of responsibility to cater for the welfare of their children. By putting their children under this type of surgery, they significantly prevent future ostracism, rejection, and humiliation from friends, family or society (which is in an African, Asian, Muslim setting) as it is an inherent societal norm, culture, and tradition #3 "Circumcision can cause many complications including death as well. The rate of complications are 2% for infants and 6% for older boys." This is a Wikipedia citation. Let me clear out what it really says. "A 2010 review of literature found circumcisions performed by medical providers to have a typical complication rate of 1.5% for babies and 6% for older children, with few cases of severe complications." 1. 5% is very far from 2%. This is a palpable inflation of sources, a fabrication set to establish good points. Next time you cheat, don't get caught :) #4 "Parents can legally get any part of their child's body cut off if there's any medical necessity to do so..... Since foreskin is not a birth defect and is a healthy, functional and highly specialized organ like an earlobe or any other body part, cutting off foreskin from a healthy boy for non medical reasons is a physical damage crime under existing law for obvious reasons." Bearing logical and ostensibly LEGAL reasons for hygiene, beautification, and conformity, parents choose to have their children's hair cut. Since, hair is a HEALTHY, FUNCTIONAL, and SPECIALIZED ORGAN, with your framework, every parent should be abusing their children, and barbershops, salons, etc., should be culpable for this "abusive" acts and should be faced with lawsuits. #5 "Can parents legally cut off appendix of their child so that the child doesn't develop appendicitis later in life.' Clearly not. This is already a statement setting me up for another contention, prevention. I'll be using my foe's sources against him. There are plausible explanations based on human biology for how circumcision can decrease the likelihood of female-to-male HIV transmission. The superficial skin layers of the penis contain Langerhans cells, which are targeted by HIV; removing the foreskin reduces the number of these cells. When an uncircumcised penis is erect during intercourse, any small tears on the inner surface of the foreskin come into direct contact with the vaginal walls, providing a pathway for transmission. When an uncircumcised penis is flaccid, the pocket between the inside of the foreskin and the head of the penis provides an environment conducive to pathogen survival; circumcision eliminates this pocket. Some experimental evidence has been provided to support these theories. [1] The WHO and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) state that male circumcision is an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention, but should be carried out by well-trained medical professionals and under conditions of informed consent (parents' consent for their infant boys).[2] #6 "If we circumcise random healthy boys only a small percentage of the boys will get the so called benefits of circumcision...... He will lose the normal natural mechanism of intercourse, e.g. the gliding action or frequent movement of foreskin during intercourse (it's 100% sure). " Yes, we can say you are 100% sure. But, are you 100% logically, empiricall, scientifically, statistically sure? Another 2013 systematic review found that the highest-quality studies reported no adverse effects of circumcision on sexual function, sensitivity, sensation or satisfaction.[3] Central Contention: Teenagers in these countries are forced to get circumcised, not solely by parents, but also by societal pressures, conformity, and prevention of future ostracism, rejection and humiliation. Circumcision characterizes a religious belief; a passage to adulthood. Even though parents wouldn't tell their children about getting circumcised anytime soon, time will come that society will force them to be curious, if not yet ready, about getting trimmed. If that time comes so, a child would swallow their saliva and get ready as they step inside the fragrant, white room, lie down, pull their pants, and close their eyes for lingering fingers to take place, thinking that after an hour or so they'll finally become a man. My other points are clearly shown in refutations. I await your delicious rebuttal :) [1] [2] [3] https://en.m.wikipedia.org...