Smoking should be illegal

I apologize for missing the last round as well. Con raises the question "Should we criminalize eating steak because doing so is dangerous and potentially fatal by contributing to heart disease?" This "analogy" says that eating steak causes heart disease, but eating steak is completely different from smoking cigarettes. Steak does not have deadly substances such as tar, and also doesn't have a substance like nicotine which is addicting. Also eating steak does not directly cause heart disease therefore the analogy that con produces does not prove the point. Con also states that heart disease is even more of a killer yearly than cigarettes with no statistics provided. Also if con would like to bring that statistic into play I would like to question in the number of deaths, how many of the people with heart diseases contracted it from smoking cigarettes? The criminalizing of cigarettes would not only lower the number of deaths per year by cigarettes but it would also lower the deaths per year for all of the problems that come with cigarettes including heart disease. Con states that the analogies are relevant in the sense that they compare the dangers of cigarettes and other things. That is absolutely ridiculous because my opponent's analogies are nowhere near as dangerous as cigarettes are. The analogies given are steak eating and big wave surfing. Those analogies do not cause anywhere near as many deaths as cigarettes do and are not highly addicting as cigarettes are. Also they do not effect the people around them such as second hand smoke does. I am no doctor but I do not think that when someone has heart disease the reason is they eat steak a lot. Con continues to bring up the black market and how gangsters and criminals would get rich if cigarettes were illegal. Also that everything that is prohibited ends up being sold on the black market. So if we shouldn't criminalize cigarettes because they would be sold on the black market then should we just legalize everything and stick warning labels on them so people can make their own decisions? Con did not address that question that I asked in the previous round. Con also argues that we would need more police to enforce the new law which would cost money. So we should keep cigarettes legal in order to save the government some money? Half a million lives are now worth the amount of money it is to pay more policemen? Con states that cigarettes are personal choices and do not effect others, yet second hand smoke is very deadly. Now walking next to someone who is smoking or being in the same room as someone else is not necessarily a personal choice. Sometimes it is a choice but there are instances in which it cannot be avoided. Cigarettes should be criminalized because of all of the lives that they take each year and how many people lives it ruins. Getting lung cancer or heart disease is a lot deadlier than going to prison or getting a fine. Once a disease like that is contracted there's nothing really left that can be done. Criminalizing cigarettes would save lives, that is the main point. Numbers for heart disease, lung cancer, and other ailments that are caused by cigarettes will also decrease, which would mean saving more lives than the previously mentioned half a million. Saving half a million lives or more should be worth the money spent on extra police and the possible risk of the black market selling cigarettes.