Right Wing Governments, In General, Are Less Moral Than Left Wing Governments

Outline: I will argue that immorality is equally found on all wings of Government in Argument I. In Argument II, I will argue that what is consider Moral, More Moral, or Less Moral, is different from person to person. Some will consider death more immoral then life in prison, and vice versa. In Argument III, I will explain how Pro's examples aren't restricted to Right-Winged governments.Argument I: Right-Winged Governments v Left-Winged Governments.Pro tries to prove that Right-Wings governments are more immoral than Left-Winged governments by showing examples of how they, like any group, can be bad. However, his examples are cherry-picked and even include issues that aren't Right-Winged. Such issues including slavery, which is found in many countries, regardless of their alignment. Pro is trying to make these great evils look Right-Winged based, when they aren't.There are also good Right-Winged governments. Some would consider the US, still Right-Winged, to be a very good nation. Just as Fascism and Nazism are bad, so are many Left-Winged countries. The USSR, a major Communist/Socialist nation, was responsible for more war deaths in WWII than every Axis power together. Consisting of 10,000,000 soldiers killed through the use of inhumane war strategies, such as moving men over mine fields to clear paths for tanks. This is HALF of the total military death count of WWII (1). They also planned to kill 20,000,000 Jews in a holocaust of their own, before Stalin died (2). The Soviets are responsible for some of the most immoral practices in human history (3).North Korea, also a far-leftist government, is among the worst and most immoral nations in history. Going as far as to have a 3 Generations of Punishment sentence. The punishment would involve one's whole family to be thrown in prison and kept there for 3 generations of children (4). This is only an example of the Immorality of North Korea.Another example of a Leftist government would be the Chinese, decades back. Mao Zedong killed many people. While it is not possible to know how many died, estimates go up to 75 million, almost the ENTIRE death count of World War II. The Great Leap Forward killed a possible 45 million alone in four years (5). Without a doubt, this would be the greatest massacre of men in history.Communist/Socialist Regimes also include Vietnam and multiple South African nations. The total death count of these nations reach as high as 100 million people outside of war (6). There isn't a doubt that, as bad as any Right-Wing nation can get, a Left-Wing nation can get just as bad, if not worse.1) http://warchronicle.com...2) http://globalfire.tv...3) http://www.nybooks.com...4) http://www.cbsnews.com...5) http://www.independent.co.uk...6) http://en.wikipedia.org...Argument II: Relative Morality.While many would consider Stalin's strategy of moving men over mine fields more moral than Hitler's gas camps, many would find Stalin's strategy more immoral. The eye of the beholder determines this. While Pro argues morality from a Leftist perspective, someone on the Right would view it from a Rightist perspective. A Fascist would see Socialism to be more immoral than what Fascists did. Many Fascists wouldn't see anythign the Fascists did to be immoral. Which side is more immoral depends nearly entirely on which side is viewing the issue. We see that when Pro brings up the Colonials killing the Natives. Many would laugh at the idea that the Colonials were bad for killing off the Natives through disease. With the exception of a slight few, most Colonials didn't think about diseases... Where they lived, they where either immune, or could be cured. How would they know the Indians didn't have those diseases or cures to them? Remember that they didn't know a disease was a tiny organism. They thought they were evil spirits. They never once thought the Indians would be wiped out by them...That is an example of how Pro thinks they were immoral for causing the genocide of Natives, and I don't believe they were wrong since they never expected something like that. Morality is based on who's perspective you view it from. While a Leftist would assume that Right-Wigned governments are worse, a person from the Right would believe Left-Winged governments are worse.Argument III: The Immorality of any Government.Claiming Right-Winged Governments are more immoral because they have slavery makes the assumption that Slavery is a Right-Winged issue. Many would assume Communism is also forged on the backs are slaves, whom we pretend are called citizens. That again returns us to Argument 2. There were, and are, many South African communist states filled with slaves and slave trading. Many Communist nations have no polls or voting, and many today have unwelcomed citizens who get pushed aside and displaced for not being of that culture.Africa is full of almost everything Con listed off for the older United States and Europe. They aren't all Right-Winged governments. The idea that these issues are Right-Winged because you can find them in Right-Winged governments is terrible fallacious.Conclusion: I have shown that Left-Winged governments can be just as immoral as Right-Winged governments. I have explained how every issue Con mentioned isn't restrictively Right-Winged, and how what is deemed more immoral depends on the people explaining it.