Religious public schools in Canada

First I would like to point out Canada's charter of rights and freedoms... Fundamental Freedoms 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; -"I would like to point this part out because this will base my fundamental argument and back up Canadians legal rights".- (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association. ....Addressing the oppositions statements.... 1."Publicly funded Religious schools only exist in a few provinces: Alberta, Ontario, parts of Saskatchewan and the Northwest territories. Having been educated in the Alberta version, I find such schools are no longer necessary in this day and age." 1.-Attack- Any schools are necessary, education and if any place provide this then it is legitimate and provides a place wear students in this area learn. To dismantle one of these schools would cost the government unnecessary debt, when they already have functioning schools already. 2.a- - "Separate School divisions are still allowed to discriminate based on faith when employing educators. 2.b - Parents are compelled to send their children to these schools due to lower cost and higher quality of education. However, in doing so their children are indoctrinated into faith, whether it is the faith of the parents or not." 2.a- Attack -The fact of discriminate based on faith my opponent addresses is a fact not supported by any evidence also that this is a opinion of what he believes these schools do, which is not always the case since schools are already having a decline in jobs and most likely can't hire people. but again he hasn't given any proof of discrimination. 2.b-Attack - Yes, however this is the parents choice, so if the parent chooses to then they choose to they don't have to. 3."I say no to the public funding of religious schools in Canada. I am however, not opposed to private religious schools. Government should neither support nor inhibit religious activity and education." Attack- 3 - Who said the government supported the religious activity or education? All the goverment supports is education, all public schools need funding for their education programs and utensiles. Not funding these schools would not provide any utility nor help socitey. School that have religious veiws have the right to have their religous views according to the charter, plus the majority of the school could believe in this religion, are you really saying lets strip there freedom of religion. We shouldn't because this is their school, they should have the right to pray, or read the bible or etc in their school. This doesn't mean every person has to agree with their religion but accept it. ...My Case... Religious public schools should have governmental funding for their education programs and in general provide education like every other school. As long as a school provides basic education for the students in should have govermental backing unless its a privite rich school who can provide this all on its own. So what does a relgious school harm? Nothing, nothing at all my opponent might say it infulences the kids into a religion but in the end that religion is there choice they don't have a gun to your head saying "JOIN US OR DIE!!!". So theres really no diverse effects of a religious school, now further more its the choice of the parents to which school does a kid go to and if they do not want there then they would not put them there. This is all about rights and choices , and if someone choses to go to a religous school they have the right to and it ought to be government funded for educational purposes. As well as they have the right to their religious beliefs and should have a religous school if they please.