Nadya Suleman should lose custody of her children!

Nadya Suleman has obviously been USING her children for fame and money that she has (and may be receiving in the near future from Britan?).She has no real job,and has been mooching off of anyone that is gullible enough to take pity on her.She spends money beyond her means on plastic surgery and implanting an absurd amount of embryos inside her.She is,without a doubt, using her money more on herself than her children.I find it unfair that someone so self absorbed should be allowed to use her children as if they are "pay checks" rather than living,breathing human beings that rely on financial support and,just as much needed love and attention.But,how can a mother do that if she is constantly focused on becoming.It is unhealthy for children (or anybody in general)to be put in front of a camera for a long period of time.Look at all of these celebrities that have turned to drug abuse and alcoholism,some have even resorted to suicide due to the stress of fame.Also,if you act caring to your kids in front of a camera,yet do a complete 180 when the camera is off,it tends to confuse the children involved and eventually they will question whether their parent(s) really love them or not.Children have enough stress dealing with things like schoolwork and a social life among peers.It would be common sense to see that these children are at an all around disadvantage.This is what they lack in order to grow as a child needs. -A father figure -A mother that is (sincerely) focused on her children (and their welfare),rather than fame and getting freebies. - A mother with an actual JOB -Security(not talking about bodyguards),but financial stability as well as one on one(and group time) with their parent(s)/guardian(s) So I propose that these children be placed under foster care/adoption with RESPONSIBLE adults that are capable of taking care of children.Since they are still young and are often not together all at once,now,or soon,would be a perfect opportunity to place them with people who actually care. I have a personal saying about family,"Family isn't by blood nor marriage,but of the heart" You could be born in China yet adopted by an American family,and still be their child.Not just legally,but in your hearts. If you look at Nadya Sulemans background (not necissairly in trash magazines like "US" and "Life & Style") from watching the news and even hearing her side,it is clear that she tries to hide behind weak statements as to why she has walked this path in life."My daddy never loved me" is a statement she made in "The Tennessean" newspaper a while back.It is a weak statement to blame your greed on the lack of love from a father figure,especially when you're an adult! You are responsible for your own actions as an adult,not just morally,but legally as well.I find it immoral to leave children in the hands of people who do not care about them or their welfare. So what if she is their biological mother? There are plenty of biological parents in this world who don't care about the lives they bring into this world.Look at the abortion statistics,look at the percentile of children who were given up for the sole purpose of being unwanted,not just because of bills and housing issues.Some people do both for a better cause than, "I just didn't want my child",so not all are as heartless as Nadya Suleman.It is unfair for a child to be in custody of such vile women who feed off the pity of the gullible.Nadya Suleman is far from a decent mother.She is only a half witted,self absorbed,and heartless woman who preys on the gullible for support rather than helping herself first.She is an eyesore to many Americans based on what she has done to her brood.She has no real means to support them and acts like a die hard diva with weak excuses as to why she brought so many lives into this world.This is not an argument against single mothers,but so-called "mothers" who act as if they care for the well being of the lives they bring into this world. Many people are more concerned for her children than Ms.Sulemans own wellfare.Which is why I have brought this up as not just a debate,but a mere suggestion for those who are concerned about these children.I find it despicable for any woman to claim they love their children when her actions clearly state otherwise.There is no excuse for abusing,neglecting,nor exploiting a child for fame. Resources: http://en.wikipedia.org... (and just about anywhere else really)You almost can't go anywhere without hearing about her business no matter how private.