Euthyphro's dilemma is a false dilemma.

My arguements are not irrelevant. You stated this exactly: I argue that it doesn't matter if God commands what is moral, or whatever is moral is "arbitrary". Because God is omnibenevolent, then his moral commands are "good". I will leave it as this for now, and await my opponent's argument. I argue those exact statements, because you said that's what you wanted to ARGUE. You stated it does not matter if God commands what is moral, I went AGAINST that. You stated that whatever is moral is arbitrary. I also went AGAINST that. After all, isn't this debate? Is that not what you wanted to ARGUE since you stated the words," I ARGUE?". This is common sense, please get some. I stated the majority of Christians because my opponent made this statement: It does not matter if God commands what is moral. Well then, according to 2.1 MILLION PEOPLE, it does matter. This is a big enough number to substantially prove that IT DOES matter if God commands what is moral. Thus your first arguement is FALSE. Even if one person did believe his commands were significant, it would still be proven false. Your arguments are basically assumptions. Assumptions should be based on the MAJORITY VIEW AND STATISTICS and it is not. There is not a significant number to support your assumption. HOPEFULLLY WHAT YOU WANT TO ARGUE Quote of Opponent: HOWEVER, I argue that if God, by virtue of the definitions I gave in Round 1, is omnibeneveloent, then whatever he decrees will be morally righteous since HE IS MORALLY PERFECT. How do we know God was omnibenevolent? Are you sure he was morally PERFECT? There can be no such thing. There is no PROVEN facts that he was in fact OMNIBENEVOLENT. This means that his judgements are left to question. Because he himself was not morally perfect, his judgements were consequently not perfect either. The dilemma then comes into play. Is what is moral commanded by God because it is moral, or is it moral because it is commanded by God?" This dilemma is very real. Let's analyze the first segment: Is what is moral commanded by God because it is moral? How are we to know that God ALREADY knows what is moral or what is not moral? There's no proof showing that God can see these things, that God can guess or suggest such things. So we MUST ask our selves this same question. The second segment: or is it moral because it is commanded by God?" Just because one figure of power says one thing, does this mean that it is always right? NOT AT ALL. This is why we have DOUBT. Although one might seem superior in ways, it does not mean they always ARE. Just because God says so, it is? Just because SOMEONE ELSE says so it is? We must first find reason to believe that he his commandments of morality are in fact true and real. One might argue that well, if God is good, why do so many bad things happen? But lets not go there. SUMMARY I argue that God is not a completey omnibenevolent figure and there is NO PROOF TO PROVE SO. This means that the dilemma is in fact REAL. This means that what god commands can not be moraaly perfect either. Thus, this dilemma exists. Is he really morally perfect? Are his commands moral because he MIGHT be morally perfect? Until we can answer the first question, this dilemma will ALWAYS EXSIST.