god according to the bible would ---not--- use text as a form of communication

See? That’s why I hate debating with teeny boppers still stuck in high school and or a dropout with obvious limited intelligence and a stunted edumacation. No offence. Its just how thing are. Now exactly what is the first sentence of this debate? “god according to the bible would ---not--- use text as a form of communication, the worst possible form of communication to god.” Now let’s look at a few definitions for “text”...1. the main body of matter in a manuscript, book,newspaper, etc., as distinguished from notes,appendixes, headings, illustrations, etc. 2. the original words of an author or speaker, as opposed to a translation, paraphrase,commentary, or the like: The newspaper published the whole text of the speech.3. the actual wording of anything written or printed: You have not kept to the text of my remarks. 4. any of the various forms in which a writing exists: The text is a medieval transcription. 5. the wording adopted by an editor as representing the original words of an author: the authoritative text of atullus. Now do you really think a god according to your bible would actually choose text as a form of communication so everybody can get it wrong? Let me help you out a bit. And please read these and take it all in and think about them before reacting because they are all true...“If god is all knowing and he knows the future of all events and he wrote a book that can only be interpreted as if it endorses slavery and if its heinous violence against your children against your neighbors… how could a god be that omnipotent and devise a book where we can’t distinguish between the law of Israel and god’s law? I mean their interwoven where we have metaphor and fact and nobody can distinguish the two. We don’t know what we’re supposed to take figuratively. We don’t know what we’re supposed to take literally. Was it actually a tree? I mean come on. How can anyone distinguish this. I mean come on. It doesn’t make any sense. It doesn’t matter how its translated. It doesn’t matter what version. If it was written by an omnipotent being there would be ONE VERSION. And there would be only ONE WAY to interpret it because it would be written well.” Aron Ra Actually it wouldn’t be written at all. What’s wrong with your god comin’ down and talking to people? ‘Hey you know some of that stuff that’s in the book? I’m here to correct it.” Matt Dillahunty “We have to rely on copies of copies of anonymous authors with no originals and the textural testimony to a miracle for example, there’s no amount of reports, anecdotal reports that is sufficient to justify in believing that actually happened as reported. And anything that would qualify as a god would clearly understand this and if it wanted to clearly convey this to people in a way that is believable would not be relying on ---TEXT--- to do so. And this to me is the nail in the coffin for christianity. The god that christians believe in is amazingly ---STUPID---!!! If it actually wants to achieve its goal by spreading its word to humanity by relying on text, by relying on languages that die off, by relying on anecdotal testimony, that’s not a pathway to truth. And anything that would qualify for a god would know this.which shows either god does not exist or doesn’t care enough about the people to understand the nature of evidence to actually present it. Now which of those two possibilities is accurate?” Matt Dillahunty “If jesus and Muhammad and abraham and moses had never been born, which in any case I tend to dabble, if all their stories were untrue were suddenly found and everyone had to admit it some people I know would show panic. Now what would we do? We’d have no morals suddenly. What could be more nonsensical than that? As the matter of fact the position that we occupy would---be---precisely---the---same as it is now if none of these texts had ever been written, as if none of these lacerations had ever been made. We would still have to reason together about how how to treat one another, about how to build a just city, and about how to have irony and a sense of humor.” Christopher Hitchens In other words, there’s no evidence in text with translation after translation with copies upon copies over the thousands of years with absolutely no possible way to trace it back to the original. So how on earth is anybody expected to get what they are reading correct? Its impossible no matter which bible you are reading with over 100 different English translations alone. Do you you really think your god would be that stupid to not have the insight and not know this? The simple solution is to have actual evidence and talk to us as an example. But no. The god you worship, in which case you cannot even prove even exists, plays a hide and seek game with you and uses faith. And faith is not a path to truth at all now is it especially again, when your god can talk to us as evidence.