Dinosaurs and the Bible

You said Current scientific evidence points to evolution creating both dinosaurs and humans, over the course of the history of the Universe - beginning 13+ Billion years ago, to the history of our planet - roughly 4.5 billion years ago via radiometric dating of meteorites. The error margins on this for various reasons are a handful of million years, but not billions. [1] Every previous dating process known to man prior to radiometric dating, and prior to accounting for a handful of other factors, measured in the millions of years. If you disagree specifically with radiometric dating, (Science's current method for accounting of the age of rocks, for the most part) please let me know and I'll elaborate. My response Well the way most scientists have been dating rocks have been inconsistent to say the least. In June of 1992, Dr. Steven Austin took a sample of dacite from the new lava dome inside Mount St. Helens, the volcano in Washington state. The dacite sample was known to have been formed from a 1986 magma flow, and so its actual age was an established fact. Dr. Austin submitted the sample for radiometric dating to an independent laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The results came back dating the rock to 350,000 years old, with certain compounds within it as old as 2.8 million years. Dr. Austin's conclusion is that radiometric dating is uselessly unreliable. Critics found that Dr. Austin chose a dating technique that is inappropriate for the sample tested, and charged that he deliberately used the wrong experiment in order to promote the idea that science fails to show that the Earth is older than the Bible claims. I will leave a link to the paper which can be downloaded http://www.icr.org... You said The creationists' view of the age of the earth varies from between 3.8k and 5.5k years B.C. the average putting the age of the earth around 6 thousand years. [2] The error margins for these are mostly based on translations of the Bible and disputes about the age of certain biblical figures. My response Elaborate please You said Also, because the Earth is 6,000 years in your view, you have to explain to us how the Dinosaurs became extinct and humans did not within this 6,000 year span. Modern science believes an asteroid impact is the most likely cause, dating and showing a crater and ageing it to be 65 million years ago, roughly. [3] According to creationists, the Noah's Ark scenario occurred roughly 4 thousand years ago. [4] In the story of Noah, 2 of each animal was brought upon the Ark, as well as his family. Nothing specific in the scripture, to my knowledge, says anything other than that Noah brought 2 of each kind of animal with him. This would include dinosaurs were they to exist. My response After the flood some dinosaurs were hunted for their meat Some where killed off because they were a menace, after the flood a lot of animals like the dinosaurs started to get hostile. You said In the current day times, most Americans believe in evolution. Many of these are religious humans who believe their God had a hand in guiding this. [5] If you believe in both Noah's Ark and Evolution, this presents a problem with your argument as well. My response FYI not American nor a believer in evolutionism You said The problem occurs with science's idea of Minimum Viable Population (MVP) [6] as well as Incest, in paricular. In a Biblical understanding of the world, Noah brought only 2 of each species on board. This would mean there was only 2 left of every species which walks this Earth. A population of 50 giant pandas leads to a 30% chance of extinction factoring in multiple factors. With 2 left of each species, that percentage goes up massively. With 2 left of each though, who do you think survives in the aftermath of the flood, weak species like the human, or the T-rex? Now let's factor in incest. With 2 left of each species incest is inevitable. The results of incest [7] can be quite nasty or perhaps relatively mild. However, in order to believe in Creationism one must not only say that humanity survived one bout of MVP, but two. Adam and Eve would be considered the first humans and from which all humanity stemmed, and then Noah and his family were the only ones to survive the flood. In these situations incest, and the negative effects, are inevitable. My response No Noah brought two of every kind of animal eg dog kind cat kind ect also animals that had nostrils. ps I'm having to rush because I have very little time left sorry I have to end it here because I have just over a minute left but a last thing to add the word dinosaur was created in the 1800s the bible was written in the 1600 so they couldnt use the word dinosaurs