The Bible is Literally True

1. Rebuttals - Unfortunately, I'm not really able to actually disprove most of my opponent's claims, as they're really vague and I don't understand what they mean at all. Because of this, I'll ask my opponent a few questions about what he means so I can properly rebut him once he has specified his views."My opponent claims the Bible's stories are not true, because there is evidence which contradicts them. However, drawing the conclusion that these ancient mythologies are false would be committing a larger, spiritual error. " My opponent is correct in saying that I claim that the stories of the Bible are not true because there is evidence which contradicts them. How am I committing a larger, spiritual error by claiming so? I'm pretty sure that I'm not committing an error by claiming that the Bible isn't true, as there is overwhelming evidence that the stories are fictional and all that I'm doing is piecing together logical and scientific evidence in order to come to a reasonable conclusion. I can't see how any spiritual error is committed, as I'm not really doing anything wrong - all I'm doing is using evidences, facts, and proofs to support a justifiable claim."The Fall of Man is a teaching of all the major religions." How so? Please provide reasonable evidence and or proof for this claim. Teaching every religion hasn't lead to the fall of man - of course, religion has led to an abundance of horrible things happening, but there's nothing wrong with just telling people what different religions believe in/practice (you haven't specified if 'teaching' a religion includes 'preaching' it - I can only assume that by teaching, you just mean explaining what a religion is like without actually promoting it). What are you referring to as the 'Fall of Man'?"Possessors of esoteric knowledge have throughout the ages transmitted these stories because they hold real symbolic powers, like words and abstract thoughts."What are the 'symbolic powers' of Biblical stories? Where is the actual evidence that these symbolic powers exist? Please explain."Strictly speaking, it is impossible for the truth-seeking man to believe in Evolutionism."How? As far as I know, virtually all scientific evidence regarding the matter supports the theory that evolution is a valid theory that was responsible for how contemporary species came into existence. Please provide evidence for your claim instead of only giving a baseless assertion. For more evidence on why evolution is scientifically true, please see http://necsi.edu... click on the four further links at the bottom of the page for more specific evidences regarding evolution.Overall, I'm pretty sure that I have shown why my opponent's argument is unreasonable and invalid (he provides no evidence for his claims). If my opponent wants to win this debate, he needs to show why his claims regarding the Bible's truth have evidence and rebut each of my claims regarding Biblical contradictions.2. Contradictions between Jesus Christ and Science - I will now provide a variety of contradictions that show how science refutes the possibility of Jesus as the Messiah, and therefore shows how the Biblical accounts of Jesus as the Messiah are untrue.- In John 11, Jesus supposedly raises a man named Lazarus from the dead. There is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever that any human being can be raised from the dead.- In Matthew 14:25, Jesus supposedly walks on water. There is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever that any human being can walk water.- In John 9, Jesus supposedly heals a man who had been blind since birth. There is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever that a human with the technology and medicinal knowledge of 2,000 years ago could have instantly cured a blind man.- In Matthew 8, Jesus supposedly heals a man with leprosy. There is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever that a human with the technology and medicinal knowledge of 2,000 years ago could have instantly cured a man with leprosy.- In Luke 7:11-18, Jesus supposedly raises a widow's son from the dead. There is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever that a human being can be raised from the dead.- In Matthew 12:22, Jesus supposedly heals a man who had been possessed by demons. There is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever that 'demons' exist or can possess people.- In Luke 24:5-6, Jesus rises from the dead. There is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever that anybody can willingly give themselves life after death.3. Conclusion - Overall, I believe that I have successfully rebutted my opponent's unreasonable argument, and provided more evidence that the Bible isn't literally true. Once more, my opponent must counter my evidences agaisnt the Bible and provide valid evidences for the Bible in order to win the debate. Thanks, and good luck! :D