The United States is on the Verge of Civil War

You are making the positive claim that the "The United States is so polarized, And the leadership so corrupt that really the only choice the majority has to restore Democracy is armed revolution! " therefore, The burden of proof lies upon you to demonstrate that your claim is cogent. "Yes, I have" --No, You did not make any points in your previous statement. The entire response was a non-argument. "okay give it a stab. . Angry minorities angry women, Gender gap antifa. . Far right terrorism in synogogues that pipe bomb stuff, , And the inccility in our public dialogue" --This statement makes no clear, Coherent, And sound assertions. okay give it a stab - Give what a stab? You haven't given me anything to refute without first asserting it with evidence. angry minorities - Do what? Cause what? Are how prevalent? All minorities? angry women - Do what? Cause what? Are how prevalent? All women? Gender Gap - Requires further elaboration, Proof, Examples, Why it's relevant, And how it contributes to your point. Antifa - Requires further elaboration, Proof, Examples, Why it's relevant, And how it contributes to your point. Far right terrorism in synagogues - Requires further elaboration, Proof, Examples, Why it's relevant, And how it contributes to your point. that pipe bomb stuff - Which pipe bomb stuff specifically? the inccility (Im guessing incivility) in our public dialogue - Which dialogue? All public dialogues? Examples? Why/How does this contribute? "People used to be able to sit down to thanksgiving dinner with members of their family of all shades of ideology and party, There are numerous reports that the polarized nature of public dialogue has effected holiday dinners people will no longer be in the same room with members of the opposing party" --This is one large claim that you have provided zero proof/explanation of, And have failed to elaborate as to why and how this supports your position. Which people used to be able to sit at a holiday dinner with their family but can no longer? Why is this so important? Explaining or at least mentioning the reports that specifically refer to the, "polarized nature of public dialogue" effecting holiday dinners, Is necessary at very least. "Also we have armed militias" --Ok, So what? "Trump supportes with pipe bobms trying to kill democrats" --Ok, So what? "nazis killing jew and black cause trump says its okay to hate. . " --Proof of both, Nazis killing Jews and blacks, And, Trump saying its okay, Is necessary. Again, So what? "We even have rabid socialists in congress now! " --There are currently two independent candidates in congress both of which are in the senate. One is Bernie Sanders, A self described democratic socialist who advocates for a workplace democracy and favors the Nordic model of social democracy. The other is Angus King a moderate independent who has been quoted as saying he is "neither a Democrat nor a Republican, But an American". Every other member of congress is either an elected Democrat or a Republican and the two individuals I mentioned certainly cannot be described as "rabid socialist". Socialism is a broad term and encompasses many derivations of socialist ideology that are often mashed with other existing theories such as, Libertarian socialism. Contrary to popular American belief socialism does not mean communism, However, Communism is considered to be an extreme variant of socialism. "antifa is just a bunch of goofy kids that mean well they want to fight the nazis but don't know how. . They are not armed or organized BUT GIVE THEM TIME" --Again, So what? This is a slippery slope fallacy as well. Almost entirely a non argument, With no elaboration, Explanation, Support, Or logic. The premise is also a slipper slope.