Mass Immigration = Genocide

I have heard this argument again and again from the extreme right. I will explain why diversity is a good value everyone should embrace, and how what my opponent has stated is not realistic. -------------------------------- Definitions: Genocide; Expanded UN definition of genocide including, "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. " Mass Immigration; from the host countries perspective this is relative to host country size; mass migration is any migration that can cause major long term changes in ethnic % ratios in a society. Thus note immigration within certain limit does not constitute mass immigration. The key word in the definition of genocide is deliberate. Deliberate-done consciously and intentionally: The main reason why so many people would deem my opponent's statements as far fetched is because the people that would allow mass immigration to happen are deliberately wanting genocide of the white race. Does that mean that a supporter of mass migration is a supporter of genocide? Am I a supporter of genocide? No, I am not. Genocide is a deliberate offensive that is usually forced. Also, in order for my opponent to be correct in his assertion that a mass migration would degrade the white race in numbers. I would like to state that white people are not forced into reproducing with someone of a different race. It is there choice. If a white person wants to reproduce with another human of a different race, than my opponent would deem that as a step towards genocide of the white race. Again, genocide would mean a deliberate offensive against a group. The situation where a white human wants to reproduce with another human of a different race is not a deliberate offensive. ------------------------------------------------------------ The Link: My opponent fails to give any empirical evidence of mass migration hurting another race. I will give evidence explaining how mass migration does nothing to degrade another race in numbers: 1. My opponent already admits " it is demographic fact according the the US Census statistics that even in the US with all the diversity we have the majority of people marry same race partners whether they are white, black, asian, or Latino. " This is a huge advantage to con. My opponent knows that it is natural to reproduce with your own race. My opponent knows it to be fact that Asians and Blacks reproduce within there own race. If it is a historic fact, than it significantly reduces the chances of mass migration meaning genocide. My opponent could argue that political correctness is leading to white people wanting to reproduce with the other race. Bill Maher did an excellent talking point explaining how ultimately political correctness is selfish. I am sure my opponent can agree on this. He explains how white people use PC as a defense mechanism for all the racism whites can be associated with. PC makes an individual feel good about themselves when there not actually doing anything. I fail to see how this already selfish value would lead to a person to marry a person of a different race especially when there is already evidence of white people naturally wanting to reproduce with white people. I would argue that racism is also subconscious. What makes you think PC people haven't escaped this subconscious trait? 2. Europe: The Amnesty report focuses on Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland - along with France, home to Europe's largest Muslim community. Anti-Muslim sentiment has helped fuel far right parties and leaders in recent years. A case in point: Marine Le Pen of France's National Front, who placed third in presidential elections on Sunday. The report looks at the impact of particular laws, like French legislation barring women from wearing the full-face veil, or niqab, in public or girls from wearing headscarves in public schools. Amnesty argues these bans and others violate basic European rights. "We should not forget that some rights - like the right not to be discriminated against, the right to freedom of expression, the right to freedom of religion, are fundamental rights and governments have the duty to respect and fulfill them," said Perolini. Amnesty points to other examples where religious rights are being compromised. Switzerland bans mosques from having minarets. And in Catalonia, Spain, Muslims are forced to pray in streets because of a lack of prayer hall space and local resistance to building new houses of worship. Syrian refugees has been a recent enzyme for this discrimination. This proves how mass migration actually hurts the chances of genocide of a race. --------------------------------------- Conclusion: My opponent claims that our PC society will lead to genocide of the white race. My opponent has not gave any studies proving that PC white people will reproduce people of other races. I have given evidence that proves not only that a human is more likely to reproduce within there own race, but also discrimination in Europe due to immigration from the Middle East. Genocide also is deliberate. It is forced. Consenting white people that naturally want to reproduce with someone of a different race have every right to do so. It is not genocide of a group, because it is not deliberate. Sources: . http://www.voanews.com...