Determinism is true while Free Will is a fallacy

I'd like to ask my opponent to share the BoP. By that I ask that he not only prove that my stance on Determinism is false beyond a reasonable doubt but also state arguments reinforcing the opposing view of "Free Will" with examples/observations/or socially accepted data (i. e. Newton's laws are accepted as being absolute truths in their form of application because of their degree of accuracy through repeated observed and calculated experiments -ref . http://www.gotquestions.org...). I agree on the relationship between the theism/atheism debate and this one but I am not choosing that as a debate issue. I agree that proving with absolute certainty that either side is absolutely correct or if they are symbiotic is impossible which is why this is in the section of Philosophy and not Science. Since I have resource's that are based off of (credible) theories and principles I felt it more appropriate to categorize this debate as such. Logic Proof: "Every event either has a preceding event or not" (-Con summary of my argument)Close but not exactly what I was getting at. Let me clarify, I am certain that there was a event sequence that lead up to this one. And I will say that these event sequences will be sustained until the end of time­ (perceived or not). When I made the statement, "every event that occurs not only has a preceding event that can be quantitative but also a proceeding event has the same ability and as such can be predicted if enough data were to be accumulated" I was describing events in a defined sequence; one event leading to another and having independent and interdependent units that have both integral and insignificant relationships. Example: (Event/E=Event sequence of one object, U=Unit –or- specific interval within the Event) [> describes passage of time between Units, + describes adjacent units related, - describes adjacent units unrelated, \~/ describe all Events related to E1] Event2 U1>U2>U3 - + + \ Event3 U1>U2>U3 ~ E1 - + - / Event4 U1>U2>U3 The example above is a representation of a cause/effect relationship with sequences that are independent and interdependent. One way of describing the event could be mass extinction (E1), volcanic eruptions (E2), tectonic shifts (E3), and methane hydrate gasification (E4). E1 is the ultimate event that was the mass extinction of well over three quarters of life on Earth during the Great Dying. What lead to that is multiple events happening at the same time affecting multiple organisms from a variety of ecosystems. Not in all cases did one event affect all organisms in all ecosystems and in some intervals one event was able to affect a variety of different organisms and eco-systems. For more details read my reference. . http://www.wisegeek.com... Infinity at its core is mathematically flawed, I agree. (ref-. http://skyserver.sdss.org...) But I ask, if you believe in a finite universe do you believe in a finite amount of mass and energy? One of the most well established laws would be the Law of Conservation of Energy. The law states, “If a particle or body is acted upon only by conservative forces energy is conserved. ” Basically all energy in a closed system is conserved and cannot be neither created nor destroyed. And since there is a sum total of mass and energy they can be predicted with accuracy using the Law of Conservation of Energy. . http://plato.stanford.edu... For energy to be conserved force must as well since: (KineticEnergy1+KineticEnergy2…[0.5* Form1mass*velocity2])+(PotentialEnergy1+PotentialEnergy2…[ Form2mass*acceleration*distance])=EnergySum . http://physics.info... Form1 is also the equation for momentum or p Form2 is also the equation for force or F p=m*Δv F=m*a a= Δv/ Δt (Δ is a character that describes that a units' direction and magnitude has significance) Since events proceeding from the Big Bang there has been an acceleration of all particles and space-time from the point of existence at an increasing rate. All particles that began from that point had force vectors (a value that can be predicted with absolute certainty when all potential and kinetic energies are accounted for) and thus the cosmos as they are today can be traced all the way back to the point of existence. In other words since ESum=KE+PE and the units governing the result of kinetic and potential energies have vector/scalar values causality is the result which shows that determinism exists and has quantitative and qualitative proof.