The Bible morally contradicts itself

Pro completely ignored the fact that Pharaoh was said in the account to harden his own heart, so Yahweh was not FORCING Pharaoh to act the way he did, he was merely facilitating feelings that were already there. Secondly, just because God knows in advance how Pharaoh would respond to the plagues, deaths, etc, does not mean he removed Pharaoh's free will, or that he is even to blame for how Pharaoh responded. For example. A parent knows that their son hates being lectured to about gangs and drugs, and whenever spoken to about it, he gets angry, takes a smoke and gets high, goes out with his gang and breaks the law. Now, if his mother were to warn him just one more time about his behavior, about what doing drugs and hanging with gangs could lead to, he would go do these terrible things. Is it his mother's fault? No. She didn't force him to do it. He chose how he would respond, and she knowing how he would respond in advance still doesn't make her responsible for his actions. The same is true about God. God knows that sometimes, when he tells us don't lie, we will. So should he refuse to tell us don't like just because he knows we will lie anyway? God knew Pharaoh wouldn't let his people go when he sent Moses to ask him at first, so how does that make God the bad guy here? Yes, God knew when Pharaoh got humbled by the plagues, it would just make him more enraged, so what? Just because Pharaoh didn't learn from what should have been a valuable lesson to him, doesn't mean God is to blame for what he FREELY choose to do! Thirdly, as for killing innocent people, says who the Egyptians were innocent? They kept the Hebrews in hard slavery for many years. And God, who, if he exists is surely omniscient (at least for the purposes of this debate) therefore knows what sins the Egyptians were guilty of, and has a right to punish them. Fourthly, as for the children, Pro would have to show that killing children in one part of the Bible, contradicts, not his own view of morality, nor any modernist view of morality, but some other part of the Bible. This debate is about weather Bible morality contradicts itself. Now BOTH the Old and New Testament teach that we are ALL born in sin, shaped in iniquity, an as such don't even deserve to live. The ENTIRE Bible teaches that the wages of sin is death for all of us, and none of us can earn eternal life. So God has reserved the right to kill anyone at anytime who has not been forgiven of sin and converted to his righteous ways. (Psalm 51:5; Eph 2:12) Rom 5:12-14 shows that we all inherited death from our ancestors, and it was God who pronounced this curse on mankind. (Gen 3:17-19; 2:17) Even in Jude we don't see any apologies from God about destroying Sodom and the cities about it, so the entire Bible unanimously agrees on God's right to carry out the death penalty, even on infants. They have done nothing to deserve life. Scripture teaches we are all born deserving of death. Unless Pro can show from Scripture, those children in Egypt had a right to live, he can't show the Bible's morality contradicts itself. I would further add, that being God, he is able to fully compensate those children if he so pleased in the afterlife, but this is simply irrelevant at this point. Pro needs to show where the Bible contradicts itself. So far he has not done so. All he has done is try to compare what Scripture says about how God death with Pharaoh with his idea of moral values, but he has not shown where the Bible even teaches the particular morality he is holding to. He hasn't shown where the Bible says "God has no right to kill people who are INNOCENT," then show us where the Bible says "the Egyptians were INNOCENT." He merely assumes they were, when Scriptures describes them as anything but innocent. Pro also fails to show how God knowing that a person will react badly to his interference proves that by interfering, it becomes his fault that they acted badly. If a police was fairly certain that when he tried to arrest a thief the man would pull a gun and try to kill people, would the officer be wrong for trying to arrest him? No! Knowing in advance what Pharaoh would do doesn't make God the bag guy when Pharaoh refuses to let the people go. Pro assumes all the bad stuff like the death of the Egyptian firstborns and so on would not have happened if God has simply NOT INTERVENED. First of all, he doesn't know this. He isn't Lord of time. He has no crystal ball to look into possible futures to see what might have been. This is speculation. God wanted to destroy the Israelites, but Moses pleaded their case and God spared them. (Exo 32:9-14) But the whole generation God wanted to destroy died in the wilderness due to their lack of faith anyway. It all ended up the same. (Num 14:33) The firstborns of the Egyptians may still have died in some other fashion even if God had not intervened on this occasion to get Israel out of slavery. We just don't know. But even if they would not have died, how does this contradict the rest of the Bible? Does the rest of the Bible say that God was obligated to leave the heathen Egyptians alone? Does the rest of the Bible describe Egyptian society as a morally upright, God-rearing, INNOCENT nation? Scripture says NO ONE IS INNOCENT unless they are covered by the blood of Christ. I challenge Pro now, to show me where Scripture says different. Please see Ecclesiastes 7:20; Romans 3:10-11; 3:23.