Atheism is Arbitrary, Inconsistent and it Borrows from the Bible

'A belief is an acceptance that something is true without proof. ' So let me ask you, Where is your proof God does not exist? If you do not have that proof then you have a belief that something is true without proof. 'Have you even went to school? ' It's, Have you ever gone to school? "Why were people BEFORE CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM EVEN APPEARED moral? " Since the Bible is true Christianity and Judaism were at the beginning of time when God created the heavens and the earth. Atheism is Arbitrary In the case of God and His Word, They are not arbitrary. This is because there is no greater authority than God as Hebrews 6:13 says. There is no greater authority that can be appealed to than God/and by extension His Word. However, All secular views fail to appeal to God as their final authority, Instead appealing to man. Man is a lesser authority and not absolute. Thus, Any authority of man is a mere opinion to the absolute and supreme authority of God and His Word. Atheism is based on the ideas of fallible man and thus arbitrary next to God. The fact that atheists deviate from one another in their belief systems shows how relative they are regarding man's opinions. Thus, Relativism reigns supreme among them. But relativism is fallacious, Being arbitrary. Inconsistency Atheists have behavioral inconsistencies. They talk about how humans are simply chemical accidents - the end result of a long and purposeless chain of biological evolution. But the they go home and kiss the wife and hug the children, As if they were not simply chemical accidents, But valuable, Irreplaceable persons deserving of respect and worthy of love. Consider the atheist who is outraged at seeing a violent murder on the new. He gets upset and hopes the murderer gets punished for his actions. Bu in his worldview, Why be angry? In the point of view from an evolutionary perspective we are all just animals and murder is like a lion killing an antelope. But we don't punish the lion! If we are just chemical accidents, Then why punish one for killing another? Borrow From The Bible Let me ask you some questions. If people are merely evolved animals and there is no God who sets right and wrong, Then why wear clothes? Why get married? Why get and education? Squirrels don't set up universities to discuss philosophical methodology? Why celebrate the popular Christian holidays called weekends, Which is based on the Sabbath and the Lord's Day? Why have holidays anyway? A holiday is a holy day, Yet there exists nothing holy in a secular worldview. Why heal sick people (medicine) when survival of the fittest should take its course as it has in the past without interference? Why have laws? God may set laws, But if we are our own authority, Then law is meaningless. Why waste time on science? In fact, How do you know the laws of nature won't change tomorrow? You can't know the future will be uniform. Inconsistency in Logic Atheists must borrow from God's logic to reason, For how could there be laws without a lawgiver? Atheists cannot account for he existence of the laws of logic, Why they are immaterial, Why they are universal, Why they don't change with time and how humans ca possibly know about them or their properties. Biblical Christianity can account for them. The best roof for the existence of God is that without Him we would not know anything. Path to Absurdity The path of absurdity. Let's now assume that the atheistic worldview could make sense of logic. To say there is no God would logically require someone to look everywhere in the entire universe at the exact same time and for all time, Past and future, And find no God. Furthermore, The atheist would have to be powerful enough to look in the immaterial, Spiritual realm for all time too. They would also have to be powerful enough to supersede God to make sure God was not cloaking Himself from their search. In other words, For an atheist to say 'there is no God' would require the atheist to be omnipresent and omnipotent. The atheist would essentially have to be all-knowing to say God doesn't exist. Thus, For an atheist to claim there is no God would require them to be God! This, It is an absurd and self-refuting worldview. 'Believing in the Big Bang or believing that laws of nature/science can change all the time isn't part of atheism. ' Actually it is because the other alternative is to believe in God and the uniformity in nature.