Existence of God

(1) "Life comes from life and the original life must have come from Being possessing eternal life, that is, life that existed before physical life, that includes the universe..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ In this argument, you are simply relying on your theory that everything needs to be created by someone. Obviously, you don't understand how this world works. Flowers are born from the seeds of other flowers, yet nothing intelligent makes them, they still exist. (2) "TIME begins simultaneously with the birth of the universe, and God is NOT within that time..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This would rely on God existing, which you have not (and will not, as this is the final round), provided proof of. (3) "if you would say, the big bang theory was the beginning of all time, then who created that "big bang"?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Once again, there does not need to be someone for something to be created. (4) "so-called SCIENTISTS." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "so-called SCIENTISTS." What is that supposed to mean? You don't believe they exist? (5) "The significant thing about science is that it is CONSTANTLY having to CHANGE ITS CONCLUSIONS AS FRESH FACTS COME TO LIFE. Scientific textbooks only a few years old are virtually OUT OF DATE today, while the BIBLE has not had to be altered in the last degree over THOUSANDS of years since it was written." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The fact that the Bible has remained unchanged for thousands of years I believe just discredits its reliability and accuracy; obviously, it hasn't had any new proof uncovered about God since thousands of years ago. On the other hand, science has new facts uncovered every day, proving one theory after a next. That fact that science textbooks are so quickly outdated strengthens the fact that it is important to learn science over religion, as religion cannot be proven anymore. Humanity created religion to make itself sane, and to answer unanswered questions, in the age of science, many of these questions are answered, but people are too scared to get rid of these religions to accept these answers. In this context the Bible is just out of date. (6) "Why should one doubt a Book that has withstood the centuries, and every attack leveled against it, for sciences that have to be revised every few years?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you trying to say that the Bible is the only book that has withstood centuries? Charles Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" has been around since November of 1859, more than 150 years ago, and yet it directly disproves the theory of creation in the Bible, which is what you are using as your main point when trying to argue that God exists. (7) "Because nothing is permanent except God, science changes, but the Word of God do not..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Once again, you are using this as if you know God exists, which you have provided no proof for. I also believe that this discredits your argument again; the Bible has been around for thousands of years, yet no other proof has come forward to support it. I thank my opponent for the debate, but because he provided no legitimate proof that God exists, which was the basis of the debate, I urge you to vote for me.