I should be the dictator of DDO

I would like to start off by thanking Con for his response. However I was slightly offended when Con called my debates/polls troll debates/polls. In addition to this, Con really gets of topic. This debate is titled: "I should be the dictator of DDO". Anyway, I will proceed to respond to Con's arguments. "You have no power base with which you can overthrow DDO leadership and you have presented no plan of action." This debate is not about HOW I should take power. Its about IF I should take power. "Who exactly?" One example of a president of DDO who was a bully and a troll is Imabench. "Seeing as you have no support your only other option is force. You have presented no plan to seize power." This debate is about IF I should seize power, not HOW I should seize power. "Freedo has already been installed as dictator and he has the support of the people." A) That forum you showed to support this is barely a page long. B) He has no power. The current leader of DDO is Airmax. C) That forum says that Freedo is an Emperor, not a dictator. Therefor, this is not an argument. Con did not even say how many people voted for him as opposed to how many people voted for others. For all I know, Freedo may have just barely won the election. "He clocks in with over, an impressive 20500 forum posts indicating networking and contribution to the site gaining support compared to your 150ish and an ELO ranking more than 800 points above your own." This is mainly because he has been on DDO much longer than I have. He has been corrupting and ruining this website for far too long. "You have not explained how you will attempt to challenge the current powers." Why are you so interested in my plan? What, so you can report my revolution before it even begins? "What website are you going to?" I'm going to DDO. "You cite a poll that limits the election to cold war leaders with 19 total votes for Joseph Stalin." That's not the point! The point is that people believe that a dictator is more capable of solving DDO's problems than a president. "Also you have done your fair share of spamming and trolling yourself. You spammed 6+ finish the sentence debates and Stalingrad debates and you have linked to two of your own troll debates in your opening argument." OK, first of all, Con does not present any evidence of this. Second, there is nothing wrong with making 6+ debates on topics that you really enjoy. You see I support a free DDO. However there are those who try to limit what you can debate and how many times you can debate it. This action takes away freedom of speech. I want to abolish these harsh laws. "You are currently losing the debate 6-0..." Both of those people who voted on that debate only voted in order to make me lose. They provided no reasons for why they voted so I doubt that they even read the debate at all. Both of those votes are invalid. "Wait…. What? You’re going to have to expand on this. In your link you argue that 10 debates in 24 hours is restrictive. More than 10 debates in 24 hours is arguably spamming which you said you are against." Tell me this Con. Who decided that more than 10 debates is spamming? Why was the rule made that exactly 10 debates is spamming? Why not 9 or 11? "In the debate you defend spammers and trolls whom you have promised to eradicate from the site." No, my side was that smearing the blood of trolls and spammers was too inhumane of a punishment. "You have only offered empty promises to purge spammers and trolls while spamming and trolling yourself." OK Con clearly has incorrecti definitions of spamming and trolling. Until he finds a dictionary, I can not respond to this argument. "So far I’m not convinced you could fight your way out of a paper bag." I could do that too. "You’ve presented no plan of action." Because this debate is about whether I should be the dictator. "You have linked to your own troll debates and promised to end trolling and spamming while regularly doing these things yourself." I made no troll debates. Some of the debates that you linked to were started not by me, but by others. "Good luck with the revolution!!!" Thank you. OK, I will now produce more arguments to support my position. The first argument is this poll on which people voted on. Con largely exageratted the number of people who hate me and consider my a troll. This poll will show otherwise. http://www.debate.org... Another poll that I made shows the speed with which I will transform DDO for greater good. I won this poll due to the fact that people believed this. The Stalinmobile was victorious in this race. http://www.debate.org... This last poll shows how much I care about the opinions of DDO users. I want to improve DDO for the good and the fact that I made this poll shows that not only do I care about the opinions of major debaters and pollers, I also care about the opinions of spammers and trolls. http://www.debate.org... Con fails to realize that I only want to purge the spammers and trolls who can no longer be helped in any way. There is always a chance that current Spammers and Trolls can still be changed for the better. Conclusion: Con's arguments did not really support his position. He kept asking how I intend to take power but that is not what this debate is about. Con did a good enough job responding to my arguments but he had no real arguments of his own. I await his response...