Germans should not be offended when they get called "Nazi" (I think it's a compliment)

Thanks for your contentions Pro. Similar to the last round, I'll refute his then move on to defending mine. Rebuttals: "The things the Brits and Danes did were worse in my opinion. Enslaving people, like they did in the enslavement of the African continent, conquering them, robbing them of their resources makes the Germans and Italians look like santa marias in comparison" Again, it doesn't matter if someone has done something worse than them. The insult of being a bad person is still valid, and the argument I brought up still stands. "How come Germany and Italy are the only countries with this stigma. I think being a Klansman or a warmongering imperialist (like the Brits and Danes were) is worse. I think the Brits and Danes should be ashamed of their own history. I think they should carry a worst stigma in my opinion. Unfortunately they are the winners in history and they write the books" The fact of the matter is, I can agree that other groups are worse and still find the insult of being called a Nazi offensive. What he's saying doesn't have anything to do with the debate at hand. Saying that there are worse groups doesn't take away the insult. "Hitler and Mussolini did great things for their country. They built some of the best highways in the world" The terrible things he did outweigh him building highways. "It should be more insulting to be associated with an imperialist, slaveowner or a Klansman. When Britain and Denmark get maligned it's for good reason" Again, it doesn't matter if something is MORE insulting. Furthermore, my opponent slips up and pretty much raps up the debate with the phrase: "It should be more insulting". This directly tells us that he admits that being called a Nazi is insulting, which fits right in with our definition of offensive that I showed in the previous round: "causing someone to feel hurt, angry, or upset : rude or *insulting* [1] My burden of proof was to show that it is insulting, not to prove that it is the worst insult possible. "First of all that's wrong. The blonde haired blue eyed thing was a Klansman belief. A lot of things associated with mad scientists and stuff of that nature was more true in Protestant countries than in a mostly Catholic Germany. Catholics tend to disapprove of the mad scientist thing more, knowing that mad scientists use their brains for maloevant and controlling reasons. The atomic bomb is an example of this. The stereotype of the mad scientist is not made for no reason..." It was a popular German belief as well: "Hitler wanted a pure Aryan race, people with blue eyes, blonde hair, muscular (in the case of men) and beautiful (the case of women)" [2] Even if we to assume that he didn't want a blond haired blue eyed race, it doesn't matter. We're focussing on the terrible things Nazi's did in this section, why Hitler wanted it to happen to them doesn't matter at all. I don't need to address the other things that Pro trails off into as they're irrelevant to the debate. In fact, I could have conceded this point and still my argument would stand. Pro didn't attack any of the premises of my argument. He only addressed a few minor details and essentially made the same previously refuted argument in an attempt to counter my rebuttals. I've shown why it is insulting for a German to be called a Nazi and have met my burden of proof. I also want to note that Con has still not used a single shred of evidence to support his arguments. Vote Con. Sources: [1] http://www.merriam-webster.com... [2] http://www.studymode.com...