It is Preferable to be a Vampire than a non-Vampire

Rebuttals Con begins his opening argument by urging me to grab an orange from my kitchen and bite into it, but this is a silly statement on the basis of an orange being an orange; and therefore not being comparable to the blood of a human being. Moreover, oranges do absolutely not taste like dog sperm-not that I have tried the latter, as it seems Con has. So, I ask, are we really going to take the words of a dog molester seriously? I think not. Con asserts that I have forgotten that vampires 'can't endure sunlight', but this is incorrect. I made it clear in my 1st contention (Eternal Life) that vampires cannot tolerate 'prominent brightness', and thus have to avoid sunlight. I also stated that this should be manageable, if not even enjoyable, as the best time of the day is night. As for not being able to travel to countries during light hours, this again shouldn't matter; as countries like Spain are wonderful places during the evening! And as someone who used to live in Spain, I can say that in the summer months it is hot at night as well; so one can still swim in the pool, and sip some cocktails or make love at the beach. Italy is also a vibrant country at night, so Cons argument here is based on misinformation. Con then asks how one would acquire human blood, but this is a fairly easy task. Essentially, one just needs to target and then hunt down their victim; they can either invite their victim to their home, or they can place a spell on and then bring their victim back to their home. As an attractive female, I have no issue doing that. I'm sure if Con has the sex appeal that he professes to have, he wouldn't either. It's not necessarily murdering someone-if anything, you are also giving that person eternal life. If you were to murder them, you'd be ending their life completely; and they'd be dead forever more. However, when you bite into their necks, though they are weary for a short while, they will rejuvenate, and live on endlessly. How can Con label this as 'murder'? Giving someone eternal life, I reiterate, is not murder; it is the exact opposite. To answer Cons question on giving blow jobs for blood, I'm sure this method could be relied on during desperate times, but generally, finding a victim is not hard. It would only be hard if you were extremely hideous, which is not a concern on my part. Con claims that vampires are 'blood addicts', obviously disregarding the fact that normal humans require water to drink and food to eat: should they also be called water and food addicts? If a human goes without water for 2-5 days, they will inevitably perish. [1.] http://www.thewaterpage.com...If they go without any food for not that much longer, they will also die, at best, their health will be severely affected. But once again, we do not think of ourselves as being addicted to water or food;. Rather, they are basic necessities intrinsic to our survival. In the same way, blood is intrinsic to the survival of a vampire. C1.] Con proceeds by arguing that having eternal life is somehow a bad thing, which makes one wonder whether he enjoys his life at all. Scientists are continually trying to find the secrets to longer life, if not eternal life, so to possess such a gift is a marvellous thing! You'd be entering waters where all others have failed to enter. Regarding family members, the obvious solution to their mortality is to make them vampires as well; of course though, this should only be reserved for family members that you actually like. It may seem odd biting into the ones that you do like, but you'd be doing them a favour in the long-term, considering that you'd be enabling them to live forever. C2.] Here, Con states that the only guarantee is that your body will never age, as if this is actually unimpressive-but really, not aging physically is something we'd all want. He argues that the mental health of a vampire may still be fragile/susceptible to change, though this is not true. Vampires are immune to all illnesses, including mental illnesses (many of which are physical in nature anyway). Senility, for example, can be considered a physical illness. [2.] https://www.alz.org...Another error in Cons argument here is that it assumes vampires age and thus can be vulnerable to issues such as dementia, which is ridiculous, as we've already established that vampires remain the age that they were when they were bitten, and most vampires, were bitten at a young age. After all, no one craves really old blood, and there are usually sexual motivations for finding and nibbling on your victim. Who would want to nibble on an eighty-year old? At least, there would not be any romantic reasoning there.C3.] Con again makes an erroneous statement by asserting that as time goes on, it will get more boring and repetitive for a vampire, but the only things that change in a vampires life are its external surroundings; I.e, the world will change around it, but the vampire itself will not change; and who, I ask, gets bored of themselves? If you were bitten at age 20, you will never get bored of being age 20. C4.] Con argues that not being able to holiday in the sunlight is a negative thing, but as I have said, the night is always exciting. And, if you visit a warm enough country, it will still be nice during dark hours. C5.] The contention that 'life has no value' if you're a vampire is a poor one indeed. As a vampire, you still have your daily activities-the only difference is that they will occur at night. As humans do most things in the day, you will do most things when it's dark; so what we're referring to is merely a mathematical difference. C6.] It would seem that from this contention, Con has a preoccupation with sperm. Lavish Housing, or as Con wrongly states: 'Creepy Housing' Con claims that this form of housing is antiquated, but anyone with taste would find it perfectly appeasing. For, castles are not only the houses of vampires, but the houses of writers, poets, artists and royalty. Just imagine the kind of fun you could engage in. Sex AppealFirstly, I would like to note that the vampire Con has displayed in the above picture is fake and one from a movie. He has been heavily exaggerated and made to appear ugly. The real 'Nosferatu' is actually a handsome man, and one who has seduced many a female victim. Being a vampire does make you sexy, as it makes you more in tune with your sexuality; and more sensitive to the senses. It has to be said that vampires are attracted to good looking humans, so the chances of encountering an ugly vampire (because of the attracted to the attractive cycle) is very slim. The vampires outlined in classic literature are prime examples of this. Flying Once again, Con undermines the ability to fly and gives it much less value than it deserves. Everyone who travels would like to save money on air trips, given how expensive they can be. As for the illegality of self-flight, because you're a vampire and can thus take the form of a bat, nobody would actually be alarmed or take notice. You would fly with privacy and complete freedom. If you wanted to go and find new, foreign victims during the night, you easily could! And you can enjoy the country's other nightly offerings while you are at it. Before returning home the next day or week, and contemplating the thought that you had a magnificent time, and saved money in the process. Con is a fool to not recognize this opportunity. Closing StatementsI thank Con for accepting this debate, but will add that I believe my arguments have been superior. From highlighting eternal life, to lavish housing, to sex appeal, to having the ability to fly. Moreover, I have successfully rebutted Cons points-which at best, were weak ones. Due to this, I ask that prospective voters vote Pro. *leans in to kiss Con, on the neck.