Rape investigations and imprisonments shall be stopped for ever.

The con still tries to evade this argument by promoting falsehoods such as that the con has refuted any point raised by the pro. It is still questionable if the con is even at all serious about arguing against the motion of this debate. As the parade of the con's lack of intelligence moves, the Pavlov's dog seems like a genius compared to the con. But, with all due respect, the pro will refute one-by-one the imbecilic arguments put forward by the con. Yes, rape is a crime only because people think of it as a crime. However, the basis on which people construct the notion that "rape is a crime" is entirely fallacious and thus should be outright rejected. Actually, rape is a passionate sexual activity in which both parties deeply engage in, usually with the participating (raping) male expressing his desire to connect and establish a deep connection with another human being, a raped female. Appreciating this, the raped female engages in her rape by granting sexual pleasure, fulfillment and satisfaction to her raping male. What resides in the foundation of rape is an forgettable memory resulting from founding a deep, satisfactory human connection between the raping man and the raped female. That is why raped female hardly forget her rape experience. Rape is a path leading to happiness in humans. (In addition to this benefit of rape, I have proved the nonexistence of any loss on both participating parties in rape in the previous rounds of my argument.) So, considering all this, is the mantra "rape is bad" held by the public ever justifiable? No. The rational, human conclusion is that the slogan is entirely baseless and shall be rejected. The thought that "rape is bad" is fundamentally the same as "coloured people are bad." A horrible, horrible notion. Despite of kind and detailed explanations clearly demonstrating the crucial differences between slavery and rape as well as logical explanations on why the former bad and the latter good, the con still either is too ignorant understand the differences or just willfully disregard them altogether. The suspiction that the con is trolling gets, at this point, much serious. The lack of the con's ability to distinguish the crucial differences between rape and non-rape is further illustrated by her mindless analogy between rape and a physical assault. Again, it is necessary to educate the con on the relevant differences between the two: a physical assault does entail a significant degree of physical damage and/or loss on the assaulted person. Meanwhile, in rape there is no or very little physical hurt on the raped female. While one may argue that some internal damage in her vagina may be a damage, that is what also can happen in a rough, passionate sex, and hence it doesn't constitute a crime. The con blatantly presents his/her repulsive level of misogyny by denying that a woman's body is her right. The con refuses to recognize that what happens inside a woman's body is her issue and her responsibility. It is questionable again if the con is living in the 21st century. The con needs first of all to learn and respect a woman's right related to her own body. Also, the con further refuses to recognize the truth that a rape is a cooperative activity between at least two participants, usually the raping male and the raped female. There is no rape that involves only one party (hence, no "self-rape" can exist.) The con needs to at least read about rape in news once. The con needs to recognize many truths. 1) The notion that rape is bad is based on a terribly faulty premise; 2) Rape is a positive activity and interaction between human beings; 3) Women's rights: What happens in a woman's body is her issue and responsibility; nobody else's; and 4) Learn to recognize the crucial differences between rape and non-rape activities. Until all of those are solved, the con will sadly have to live in his/her indefensible delusions. That way, the con can start becoming a genuine human being with a critical, rational faculty in his/her brain. Should the con refuses to adhere these precious pieces of advice, the con is nothing but "life unworthy of life."