The Bible is right.

I would like to go over more of my opponents aligations against the Bible. I feel I should because this contains to proving my case. Geneologies: refer here- . http://www.ecclesia.org... No contridiction just misunderstanding. My opponent asks the question,"Is my opponent suggesting that Jesus had half God's genes and half Mary's genes? Was Jesus only half god and half human? " My opponent is under his own assumptions here. Jesus is God, the God of the OT and the NT. Jesus made this world and mankind not God the Father. Most think that God the Father is the OT God but they are mistaken. Jesus was the firstborn of all creation and He created us for his pleasure. I again Quote my opponent, "If Adam was "alone," then we know the beasts had not been created yet. " No it doesn't. Genesis 1 and 2 was not written by different authors! lol. Moses wrote both. Also my opponent wants to look over that God was seeking a helpmate for Adam and Adam named the beast and none was found suited for Adam and God created Eve. My opponent says, "My opponent merely cites back the passages I already cited, with no analysis. Both passages punish sons for things their fathers did. " Should I have to put full chapters from the Bible? I put verses that clearly states that the sons committed the same sins as the father. The father cursed his sons and the sons in return for being cursed committed the same acts as the father. Again my opponent says, "There's no way Jesus said 3 different things as his "last words. " I ask you if three people read a book or watch a show will all three discribe it the same? Would they pick certain words or images that stuck for them? I think so. Jesus could have said all these things and the writers are telling what they have heard from the stories. Nothing more. And again,"I'm kind of shocked that my opponent claimed in the comments section that I don't know the Bible very well when he consistently confuses the Old and New Testament. " Jesus is the OT God and the foretold Messiah, BOTH. Jesus told the OT prophets about his coming to earth and He did in the NT. Moses saw Jesus-God in the OT. In the NT Jesus told the apostles that no person can see God the Father and God the Holy Ghost. He says,"And if the Bible is infallible, why don't Christians keep kosher? " Because sir we are not under the OT Jewish customs or Law. We must always follow the ten commandments. But the Laws set for Jews in the OT is no longer under effect since the Messiah has come and filfilled the Law. We are under Grace now. He says,"The passage in Genesis, by "dust thou shalt eat every day of thy life," means that the snake is condemned to eat dirt. " I supplied the passage anyone can read it. I says the snake shall eat dust all the days of his life not that is all he shall eat. Snakes do consume dirt. My opponent said," in the last round that in ancient Hebrew, cud is partially digested food. Hares don't regurgitate partially digested food. That's just factually incorrect. " Answer: rabbit is an animal that does ‘maketh' the previously digested material to ‘come up' out of the body (though in a different way than a ruminant does—thereafter does chew ‘predigested material'! . http://creation.com... My opponent says,"Again, the trail does not represent the snail's body "liquefying. " It is a separate mucus secretion – the same type of stuff that comes out of your nose when you're sick. " Snails do seem to melt and by the eye they do. This what it is refering here and snails do leave mucus as it crawls. My opponent is suggesting that the Bible must be hip on science today and the lingo they use. My opponent,"I cited MARK, which said that the mustard seed is the smallest seed on earth. " You and I cited it back but you do understand the passage nor read the passages before it. It clearly is talking people in that region and the farmer who was also in that region and that the farmer had many seeds but the mustard seed was the smallest the farmer had. My opponent,"The oldest human fossil's age is not "opinion," it is scientific fact, based on radioactive isotope dating techniques. " That is if those techniques work and that is speculation, You think they do, That does not mean they do at all. Plus I got much reason to believe that other inhabinants were on here from the Bible, If granted another debate I will show. My opponent had the nerve to say, "Saying that Isaiah is referring to Jesus is wrong because Jesus wasn't born yet. " This here show a complete lack of Biblical knowledge and understanding on your part. Jesus is God, He always been around, even way before the creation of earth. The he says,"In addition, if you read Isaiah, the context is that God is promising the Israelites perpetual peace once they kill the other tribes living in Israel. " My opponent is right it has not happened yet, It will in the New Jersualem, Which I will be there. My opponent then clearly misses this same point in his contradition of the uncircumsised. He goes on and says,"This passage tells David, "[your] children shall also sit upon THY THRONE for evermore. " This clearly did not come to pass. " Again He is right, it will in the New Jersualem. I thank my opponent for his assertions here, "My opponent confuses scientific facts with opinion. Gravity is not an opinion, although it is only a theory. " Gravity is not fact neither is Archeaology. He asks,"Where does the Bible say that all the 13 tribes that were massacred were composed of women who mated with angels and had giants as children? " The use of the word "nephilim" in this verse describes a crossbreed of God's sons and the daughters of man. The text states that Anak was a Rephaite (Deuteronomy 2:11) and a son of Arba (Joshua 15:13). Etymologically, Anak means [long] neck . http://en.wikipedia.org... My opponent again says,"Does that sound like something modern women would be okay with? If a man rapes you, he can also force you to marry him. And then he is not guilty of a crime. Does that sound moral? " Ill answer, They never raped them, for one, two they were being allowed to live amoungst the Jews. There were accepted not forced. He continues,"It doesn't matter whether Deuteronomy gives accounts of such stonings; this is a moral instruction to followers of the Old Testament. It is written in instruction format. " It should be instruction. These children never listened to parents, did as they pleased, and stole, killed, and rebeled against thier parents. God was telling them purge such evil, Yes. I guess my opponent thinks that children as these should be allowed to as they please. They did not have prisons back then and foster homes. He says,"My opponent's answer to this made absolutely no sense. He just talks about Christian beliefs regarding Satan" Satan was in heaven and taught by God. He learned the Word of God in heaven he was taught it. In heaven three is God the father, Son, and Holy Ghost already always has been. These demons now that and knew Jesus would come. They set up false Messiahs everywhere. He says,"So homosexuals in the United States should be put to death? " No. We do not follow under that law anymore. We are not to purge the sin from our nation but our personnel lives. So no one today deserves that. He ends,"My opponent STILL drops C, D, and F – the Bible sanctions slavery, Thessalonians says all Jews are evil, and Leviticus says men are worth more than women" If God sees someone as evil, they are. The Bible never sanctions slavery and I dare you to show it instead you provide nothing. Man is ahead the household and throne, above the women and certain ways. Thank You Bluesteel, Though I take my faith serious I mean no offense and enjoyed it. VOTE PRO~!