The nature of nothingness is negative not neutral

Con just forfeited the round. I'd like to remind the voters that the point of this debate is not for me to prove that nothingness is negative, just for me to demonstrate that it is more reasonable to believe that a state of nothingness would be negative as opposed to neutral. Con must give good reason that contends with my arguments as to why we should believe that nothingness is neutral. I will carry through my previous arguments and re-iterate them. I'd also like to elaborate on the term non-existence. For something to be truly non-existent then it must have no attributes at all. For example, (mythical) santa clause exists as a concept. Santa has characteristics and attributes that make him santa. For something to be truly non-existent it must have NO attributes. Jimmiwawabingbong has no attributes at all and therefore can be considered the closes thing to non-existence beyond a combination of letters. Sure, jimmiwawabingbong does exist, it's a combination of letters with no meaning, but it isn't even a concept, which makes nothingness a step up from Jimmiwawabingbong. Nothingness exists beyond a combination of letters, it implies a state of being absent of everything. It may not exist in reality but it still exists as a concept and therefore has attributes and characteristics. Why does nothingness not exist in reality? I'm asserting that it doesn't exist because it MUST not exist not because it is non-existent by nature but by necessity. It's very important that you understand why nothingness must not exist by necessity because it explains why the universe must exist in the first place which answers the age old question, why are we here? The idea of a state of nothingness is a paradox as it implies a state being absent of everything and if a state is absent of literally everything then how can it be? Therefore, nothingness is a negative that must be filled with something and this is why we have the universe. This is the utimate balance of everything I urge voters to remember that everything in the universe has an opposite or else it would have no meaning. For example. the opposite of life is non-life. But, still, this not the complete opposite of life as the complete opposite of life would be anti-life. That which removes life from existence. A rock which is non-life would not remove a rat from existence because they are not polar opposites. They both share the similarity of existing as something. However, they are opposite enough to give each other meaning. The absolute opposite of life woud be nothingness. Once we reduce life to it's most fundamental characteristic - something, we find the opposite of that which is nothingness. non-life just means a-life. Something that exists without life. It's the same as a-theism and anti-theism. A-theism is the lack of god (theism) not the complete opposite of theism. Anti-theism is the removal/denial of god, the complete opposite of theism. Empty space would be a-something, because empty space is without everything other than itself, however it is not anti-something. empty space does not remove things from existence. nothingness is anti-something. Nothingness is the polar opposite of something. This is what makes empty space neutral. It lacks everything, but still retains itself. Nothingness does not even retain itself making it anti-something. and an anti-something must be cancelled with something to maintain balance. To re-iterate upon the neutral nature of empty space (thereby disquaifying nothingness from being cassified as neutral because only 1 thing can be considered completely neutral or else it would not be completely neutral) emptyspace is absent of everything other than itself. absent of light, matter and heat but it still retains it's area. We can add to emptiness, we can add light, heat and matter but we cannot subtract or else we'd be going into the negatives or the 4th dimension. If we could go beyond/below empy space that would be the same as going beyond time and space-time is considered the 4th dimension. What is beyond space-time? nothingness. If you were in nothingness you could witness the conception of the universe because being in the 4th dimension means being able to see the past and future. Empty space is like the integer 0 in that we can add numbers to it but cannot subtract without going into the negatives. We can add matter, light and heat to empty space but cannot subtract or else we'd be going into negatives, thereby making nothingness negative. I can elaborate on everything I said but I'm not sure I need to. I've presented a compelling amount of evidence (that being reason) to believe nothigness is a state of negativity not neutrality. One may ask what the importance is of knowing this, well I can say it gives a very good expanation as to the cause of the universe. It explains WHY the universe exists and what the nature is of that which lies beyond it. It would explain how nothing, something and infinity all exist at once synergistically.