Evolution is the only viable explanation for the origin of all the species that exist today.

I accept the challenge. I pray my opponent will not forfeit many rounds. Before we begin, however, I'd like to lay out a groundwork for this debate so that it will not be a total train wreck. First of all, I'm only going to use round one for definitions and acceptance, in the interest of fairness. Also in the interest of fairness, I ask that my opponent introduce no new arguments/rebuttals/information in the final round of the debate (I will, of course, respect the same stipulation). DefinitionsEvolution - "Evolution is the change in the inherited characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Evolutionary processes give rise to diversity at every level of biological organisation, including species, individual organisms and molecules such as DNA and proteins. All life on Earth is descended from a last universal ancestor that lived approximately 3.8 billion years ago. Repeated speciation and the divergence of life can be inferred from shared sets of biochemical and morphological traits, or by shared DNA sequences. These homologous traits and sequences are more similar among species that share a more recent common ancestor, and can be used to reconstruct evolutionary histories, using both existing species and the fossil record. Existing patterns of biodiversity have been shaped both by speciation and by extinction. Charles Darwin was the first to formulate a scientific argument for the theory of evolution by means of natural selection. Evolution by natural selection is a process inferred from three facts about populations: 1) more offspring are produced than can possibly survive, 2) traits vary among individuals, leading to different rates of survival and reproduction, and 3) trait differences are heritable. Thus, when members of a population die they are replaced by the progeny of parents better adapted to survive and reproduce in the environment in which natural selection takes place. This process creates and preserves traits that are seemingly fitted for the functional roles they perform. Natural selection is the only known cause of adaptation, but not the only known cause of evolution. Other, nonadaptive causes of evolution include mutation and genetic drift. In the early 20th century, genetics was integrated with Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection through the discipline of population genetics. The importance of natural selection as a cause of evolution was accepted into other branches of biology. Moreover, previously held notions about evolution, such as orthogenesis and "progress" became obsolete. Scientists continue to study various aspects of evolution by forming and testing hypotheses, constructing scientific theories, using observational data, and performing experiments in both the field and the laboratory. Biologists agree that descent with modification is one of the most reliably established facts in science. Discoveries in evolutionary biology have made a significant impact not just within the traditional branches of biology, but also in other academic disciplines (e. g. , anthropology and psychology) and on society at large. ". http://en.wikipedia.org...Viable - For the sake of this debate, I ask that "Viable" be defined in a manner appropriate to scientific validity, similar to the definition used in the debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham. Therefore, the Pro must defend the scientific validity of evolutionary theory, and the Con must defend the scientific validity of any other hypothesis regarding the origin of species.