The Bible is reliable

I will use a historical inaccuracy and contradiction for this debate. We can focus on those two throughout with rebuttals and counter-rebuttals probably going on for some time. As an aside, I greatly dislike the KJV for scholarship, but I'm using it for my opponent. That being said, I had to replace the word for donkey synonymous with one's posterior with as$ in order to get past the profanity filter.In this debate, I will focus on:1) What did Jesus ride on into Jerusalem?2) The lack of evidence for the Exodus1) What did Jesus ride on into Jerusalem?This is a fairly simple and non-technical one. What did Jesus ride into Jerusalem on?Matthew 21.1-11: A colt and a donkey"And when they drew nigh unto Jerusalem, and were come to Bethphage, unto the mount of Olives, then sent Jesus two disciples, Saying unto them, Go into the village over against you, and straightway ye shall find an as$ tied, and a colt with her: loose them, and bring them unto me. And if any man say ought unto you, ye shall say, The Lord hath need of them; and straightway he will send them... And brought the as$, and the colt, and put on them their clothes, and they set him thereon."Mark 11.1-11: Just a colt"And saith unto them, Go your way into the village over against you: and as soon as ye be entered into it, ye shall find a colt tied, whereon never man sat; loose him, and bring him. And if any man say unto you, Why do ye this? say ye that the Lord hath need of him; and straightway he will send him hither. And they went their way, and found the colt tied by the door without in a place where two ways met; and they loose him. And certain of them that stood there said unto them, What do ye, loosing the colt?... And they brought the colt to Jesus, and cast their garments on him; and he sat upon him.ExplanationThe issue here is pretty clear. In Matthew, Jesus rides in on a donkey and on a colt. In Mark, it's just the colt. But it's more difficult than just that. Perhaps you could say Mark, for whatever reason, was focusing on the colt and just didn't mention the donkey... but there's a problem: the pronouns Jesus uses. Jesus himself uses plural pronouns in Matthew and only singular ones in Mark to refer to the animal(s). That's not just an author focusing on different things... that's changing the words of Jesus. He cannot have used both and singular pronouns at the same time.2) No evidence for the ExodusThere is, very simply, no evidence to directly collaborate the Exodus story. 1 Kings 6:1 tells us it was built 480 years after the Exodus, putting the date of the Exodus at 1446 BCE. (http://www.biblearchaeology.org...) But does the evidence for that date match up? No.The Decimation of Egypt.Exodus 12:37–38 says the Israelite population leaving Egypt was 600,000 men alone, besides women and children. So if we do conservative estimates, with 2 kids and one wife, that means there were 2.4 million Israelites leaving Egypt. The problem, however, is that Egypt in total maybe had 3-3.5 million citizens. (Mattis Kantor, 2005, Codex Judaica, p. 70). This means that when Israel left, Egypt's size was reduced to, at best, 1.1 million citizens. But it gets worse. The plagues clearly killed the cattle, the fish all died, and the crops were ruined. This causes terrible famine. Then, of course, all the firstborn die. We're looking at a loss of life on a monumental scale. As Pharoah's own advisors said before the plagues were even over, "Egypt is destroyed." (Exodus 10:7)Then, finally, there is the destruction of the entire army of Egypt. In the crossing of the sea, all of the army is destroyed. The pharaoh himself is killed. "there remained not so much as one of them" (Exodus 14:28)This mas$ive loss of life, the loss of the entire army, and the loss of the entire workforce would be devastating to Egypt. Yet, the pharaoh in 1446 BCE was Thutmose III. His reign was not a time when Egypt was destroyed, it was a time of great expansion. Great building projects were made post-1446 BCE, with what workforce, pray tell? He conquered mas$ive areas in the Levant after 1446 BCE, with what army, pray tell? And how could he if he was dead? (https://www.britannica.com...)Simply put, there is no evidence of this large scale destruction occurring. Instead, quite the opposite. This was a period of mas$ive growth and expansion. The Exodus did not occur.