For God so loved Israel, NOT the entire world

Secondly, I'd like the reader to know that CON contradicted many statements he made; the biggest contradiction was what he posted in R4 and he stated, "Pro is assuming something that I didn't make. God didn't change in the New Testament. He didn't all of a sudden decide: "Hey! Wait a second… There are these other people that I kind of forgot about for thousands of years… May be I should love them too! " I've shown evidence from the Old Testament that God loved everyone, but chose Israel to carry the law. " So GOD only chose Israel in the OT and is giving Israel everlasting salvation as stated in Isaiah 45:17, why would HE give the Israelites and the heathen Gentiles salvation in the NT if HE does not change? That's a contradiction. I provided many Scriptures showing that there are two types of Gentiles in the Bible: the heathen Gentiles, and the Israelite Gentiles or the dispersed. It seems CON continues to ignore the verses I provided in R3 and continues claiming I never explained that the Israelites (Northern Kingdom) are the Gentiles. When I gave Scripture to explain John 3:14 CON brought "In Matthew 12:40, the Bible shows how Jonah's 3 days in the belly of the whale is an example for Jesus 3 days in the tomb. " Jonah being in the belly of a whale for 3 days being an example of Jesus 3 days in the tomb has nothing to do with this topic, therefore I did not refute this. As I stated, the NT quotes the OT, so John 3:14 is quoting Numbers 21:5-9 in the OT. The ones who were in the wilderness according to Scripture are the Israelites. CON then says in R4, "Pro argues that "If the “Gentiles” are the non-Israelites, why would Christ go and teach a scattered people that are among the Gentiles? " citing John 7:35. This argument is ridiculous! The words are not Jesus' words, but the words of the confused Jews who were confused by Jesus message John 7:33-34. This is an invalid argument and should be dismissed. " CON is correct, the words are not Jesus and I never stated that Jesus spoke those words, I will quote what I said, "If the “Gentiles” are the non-Israelites, why would Christ go and teach a scattered people that are among the Gentiles? " I will admit that I made a mistake in this question; Christ didn't go among the dispersed, but as CON says the "confused Jews" asked if Christ will go among the dispersed Gentiles and teach the Gentiles. So Southern Kingdom also knew that the Gentiles Christ is giving salvation to are the dispersed or Northern Kingdom. "Rebuttal 6: Pro disagrees that the definition of Jew and Israel has changed in the New Testament. Pro's claims that I am arguing that God changes! But I didn't claim such a thing, and nor does my argument necessitate God to change. This argument should be dismissed. " If the OT says that GOD only loves Israel (Malachi 1:2), that does not mean the whole world. The Israelites are a particular people, not the whole world. So if CON says, "But in the New Testament, the definition of Jews has changed. " then what he is saying is that GOD changes and in the OT GOD said that HE loves Israel (Jacob is Israel), not the world. "Rebuttal 2: I argued that Con must show that Gold only loved Israel, and Israel alone. Pro's defense is self refuting! Pro states: "I am not GOD, so you’ll have to ask HIM that yourself when HE judges you". " - Not sure what CON is talking about here, I answered his question when I posted, "Deuteronomy 7:7 The Lord did not set his loue vpon you, nor choose you, because yee were moe in number then any people: for ye were the fewest of all people, – apparently that’s why HE chose us. " "Rebuttal 3: Pro argues that "whoever believes in him" refers to Israel in John 3:16, arguing that I am somehow privately interpreted the scripture. To support the claim, Pro provides additional verses from Acts 2:21-22. Pro's arguments are clearly out of context! The first verse Acts 2:21 is part of a reference to the Old Testament. Acts 2:22 is the beginning of a new paragraph! See it for yourself [4]. But in any case, this chapter was about the Pentecost event where the disciples learned to speak every language in the world so they can preach to the entire world, without regard to age, sex, social status or, as Acts 2:39 indicates, ethnic origin [4]. This supports my claim against Con's. " - CON, the Bible is not going to be on one topic for a few Scriptures, then jump on a completely different topic for the remaining scriptures, that's confusion. Acts 2:1-47 is all on one topic. Reader, here is how my Bible shows Scripture: . http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org... "c) Pro argues that I'm going off topic when I argue that "the Law of Moses is not required for salvation". But I'm not going off topic, because if non Jews can be saved, then that corroborates my argument. Please dismiss Pro's argument. " - This does go off topic because the Laws are a different topic. All I stated is that Israel is the only nation that was and still is under the law, but CON if you'd like we can also debate the Laws in a different debate. If interested, let me know in the comment section. "Pro then makes a strange argument! When I cite Galatians 3:7-8 to show that "Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith", Pro rebuts by saying that "every nation of people have enslaved the Israelites"! This is irrelevant and should be dismissed. " Galatians 3:8 quotes Genesis 12:3; all nations enslaved us, they did not bless us. "Pro's other argument that God loves Israel so much is also irrelevant. Pro fails to show that God only loved Israel which is the proposition of this debate. " - Already proved this, Deuteronomy 7:7. "Pro counters by saying if God loves everyone, why does He hate? Pro cites Romans 9:13 which refers to Malachi 1:3. There are two problems with this argument: First, the proposition of this debate is that God only loved Israel and hated the world. Pro is trying to change the subject. " - Not changing the subject, just asking CON that if GOD loves everyone and not just Israel as CON claims, why does HE hate Esau as stated in Romans 9:13 and Malachi 1:3? Never got a response from CON, can he not answer the question? This question is related to the topic. "But for the sake of the reader, I will explain this argument briefly, as Pro took it out of context. Esau's other name is Edom [5]. Both Malachi and Paul were referring to the Edomites who were the descendents of Esau. " - Esau is Edom, which also means red - Genesis 25:25. Esau was born red and hair, there is a people on this earth today that have red skin; their blood can be seen through their skin. So this people, GOD hates them. All in all, CON doesn’t understand the Scriptures that I posted about Israel being grafted in as Gentiles and continued saying that I never explained how the Gentiles are just the Israelites, when I did. CON also gave a few private interpretations, for instance the whole Jonah in the belly, etc. .. , which had nothing to do with this topic. He also posted something from an online article for evidence, when I clearly stated in the rules in R1 that the Bible ONLY must be used as evidence. The number one contradiction that CON makes is that he says GOD does not change (Malachi 3:6), yet he says, “in the NT Jew has a new definition” and he is basically saying that GOD changed and now loves everyone, when GOD clearly said that Israel will have an everlasting salivation (Isaiah 45:17) and Israel has HE only known (Amos 3:1-2). 2 Esdras 6:56 As for the other people which also come of Adam, thou hast said that they are nothing, but be like vnto spittle, and hast likened the abundance of them vnto a drop that falleth from a vessell. This verse quotes Isaiah 40:15 which says, “Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, hee taketh vp the yles as a very litle thing. ”Audience, I'd like you to keep this in mind. If GOD says that the other nations are as a drop of a bucket, meaning a drop of water that falls from a bucket, which a drop that falls from a bucket means nothing to anyone, how could HE love all nations? GOD is comparing the other nations, not Israel, to a drop of water that falls from a bucket, that's not love. No one cares if a drop of water falls from a bucket; GOD is saying he doesn't care about the other nations, they are as a drop of a bucket. Reader: The Apocrypha is part of my Bible, it is in my Bible and all it does is quote the OT and has the rest of our captivities that are missing from the regular bible with the OT and NT. So again, thank you CON for the opportunity to debate this talking matter. Good luck to you in your future debates.