Big bang theory

R4 DefenseMy opponent has broken the structure enough times that I don't feel obligated to respond. Nevertheless, I'm going to respond to my opponent's round two. Opponent's round two:"Quote -Is the Big Bang Theory testable?Yes, it is,"For the tests, engineers built a giant contraption called the Large Hadron Collider.Pro states the LHC is built to test the Big Bang Theory, so....What does is mean when the Physicists who worked at the LHC wrote this? -The LHC "NIGHTMARE SCENARIO" has come true.DURING MY PROFESSIONAL CAREER, ALL I HAVE SEEN IS FAILURE. A failure of particle physicists to uncover a more powerful mathematical framework to improve upon the theories we already have. Yes, failure is part of science " it"s frustrating, but not worrisome. What worries me much more is our failure to learn from failure. Rather than trying something new, we"ve been trying the same thing over and over again, expecting different results.http://backreaction.blogspot.com......What does is mean when the the TOP Physicist who works at the LHC says this? -"It"s striking that we"ve thought about these things for 30 years and WE HAVE NOT MADE ONE CORRECT PREDICTION that they have seen," said Nima Arkani-Hamed, a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J.https://www.quantamagazine.org......What does it mean when the Director of the top Physics Research Institute in the World, who was also the Chairman of the Math and Physics Department at Cambridge tells you the ALL THE THEORIES HAVE FAILED?https://vimeo.com......Everything that the state has ever taught us is wrong.Proven wrong.For decades, they shoved these absurd "THEORIES" down our throats because we lacked the technology to properly test them. Thankfully, that day has passed.But the people who built their careers on Imaginary Energy, Imaginary Matter, Non-Existent Parallel Universes, Non-Existent Alternate Dimensions, Selectrons, Photinos, Neutralinos, Tooth Fairies, Easter Bunnies and any other lie necessary to save their jobs are doing everything in their power to hide the truth.If you don't believe that..simply read my first post again....you might want to pay particular attention to the part about DISCOVERING THE EARTH IS THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE!!!!!!That would be the most important scientific discovery in the history of the human race.... and yet nobody told you about it..hmmm" toocoolblueLet's take this line by line. "What does is mean when the Physicists who worked at the LHC wrote this? -The LHC "NIGHTMARE SCENARIO" has come true.DURING MY PROFESSIONAL CAREER, ALL I HAVE SEEN IS FAILURE. A failure of particle physicists to uncover a more powerful mathematical framework to improve upon the theories we already have. Yes, failure is part of science " it"s frustrating, but not worrisome. What worries me much more is our failure to learn from failure. Rather than trying something new, we"ve been trying the same thing over and over again, expecting different results." toocoolblueFirst off, in the original source, there are no all caps sentences. Here is the original paragraph "During my professional career, all I have seen is failure. A failure of particle physicists to uncover a more powerful mathematical framework to improve upon the theories we already have." Sabine HossenfelderAs you can see the sentence uses normal capitalization. Second, this is a blog which is difficult to take seriously. My opponent has no met his/her burden of proof that Sabine Hossenfelder is the Physicists who worked on the LHC. In fact, since Sabine Hossenfelder is only one person, it is impossible for Sabine Hossenfelder to be all the physicists who worked on the LHC. If particle physics was a failure, why wouldn't Sabine Hossenfelder have posted this in a scholarly peer reviewed journal for my opponent to quote? One malcontent who may not even have worked on the LHC doesn't discredit the entire project.Then, you go on to quote someone from quantummagazine.org A website that most likely nobody else on debate.org has heard of, and therefore is of dubious reliability. You take one quote, most likely out of context, and make huge assumptions. "Everything that the state has ever taught us is wrong.Proven wrong." toocoolblueYou make extremely bold claims and provide no to virtually no evidence to backup these claims. This is non-sequitur. The fact that you frequently use all caps is also detrimental to your case. I suggest rather than trying to disprove 150+ theories simultaneously, focus on disproving one theory using scholarly peer reviewed sources and other reliable sources like snopes.com. Otherwise, your arguments are non-sequitur and come off as crazy talk. Non-sequitur "Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little to support to the conclusion.Logical Form:Claim A is made.Evidence is presented for Claim A.Therefore, claim C is true.Example #1:People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!" [4]Thank you for debating. Good luck in future debates and disproving main stream science. Happy holidays. Sources.4. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com...