The Theory of Evolution is False

I would like to inform the voters that my opponent has dropped his R1 arguments: "Problem With The Definition" and "Evolution is a Theory" and I urge the voters to deduct conduct points from him because of this.Rebuttals to: "The Witnesses of Evolution"Evolution has been witnessed:Live Evolution Witnessed In Controlled Environment Of Microbial Predator And Prey ScienceDaily (Mar. 10, 2009) — Observing the mechanisms of evolution in order to understand how a species adapts to another under different ecological conditions was the goal of researchers at the Laboratoire Écologie et Évolution at CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie and the École Normale Supérieure. They studied two bacteria -- a predator and a prey -- over 300 generations in a controlled environment. For the first time, these scientists were able to demonstrate that the coevolutionary process is dependent on ecological conditions. Indeed, under certain conditions, the prey becomes resistant to the predator, which itself evolves so that it can attack this new prey. In addition, the scientists issued a warning against the previously envisaged use of this predator (Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus) as a "living antibiotic" because, like other antibiotics, this could lead to the selection of resistant pathogenic bacteria.http://www.sciencedaily.com...; Now to attack My opponent's second R2 rebuttal to my rebuttal:Pro claims Jesus existed and people witnessed him which my opponent doesn't elaborate on or provide a BOP for this claim, therefore he's simply asserting Jesus existed and people witnessed him. Alright according to the principles of Trinitarianism which is more common among Christians than Unitarianism, God is three persons; The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit. Now having said that even after his death and resurrection Jesus never becomes God he unifies with him. Pro goes as far as saying Jesus was a God when people supposedly witnessed him. Why is this wrong; in The Bible it states;"Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs which God did through him in your midst . . . you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless man . . . This Jesus God raised up, and of that we are all witnesses . . . Let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified." (Acts 2:22-36) Rebuttals to: "How did evolution start?" Humans are evolving more quickly than at any time in history, researchers say. In the past 5,000 years, humans have evolved up to 100 times more quickly than any time since the split with the ancestors of modern chimpanzees 6m years ago, a team from the University of Wisconsin found. The study also suggests that human races in different parts of the world are becoming more genetically distinct, although this is likely to reverse in future as populations become more mixed. "The widespread assumption that human evolution has slowed down because it's easier to live and we've conquered nature is absolutely not true. We didn't conquer nature, we changed it in ways that created new selection pressures on us," said anthropologist Dr John Hawks, who led the study. The researchers analysed data from the international haplotype map of the human genome, and analysed genetic markers in 270 people from four groups: Han Chinese, Japanese, Africa's Yoruba and northern Europeans. They found that at least 7% of human genes have undergone recent evolution. The changes include lighter skin and blue eyes in northern Europe and partial resistance to diseases such as malaria among some African populations, according to the study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of the changes were tracked back to just 5,000 years ago, and "today they are in 30 or 40% of people because they [are] such an advantage," said Hawks. Many Chinese and African adults cannot digest lactose in milk, but across Europe a lactose-tolerance gene is now widespread. One reason is thought to be that at northern latitudes sunlight is weaker, so people make less vitamin D in their skin. Vitamin D is crucial for absorbing calcium, so being able to digest milk throughout life made people in colder climes healthier. The surge in global population had also led to faster evolution since more mutations occur, the researchers said. They believe that in future, the tendency to start families later in life will drive evolution. "People are having problems with infertility, so any kind of genetic variation that increases the success of later fertility will be selected for," said Hawks.http://abcnews.go.com...http://www.godandscience.org...I apologize but I will not be able to rebut my opponent's third contention until next round, due to time and text space constraints.