Homophobia is Justified

I thank bsh for the opportunity to debate. I wish him the best of luck! Premise under (1) Naturality of Homophobia1. Homophobia is a natural reaction against perceived threats of homosexuality.1.1 Homophobia, like many prejudiced feelings, are natural.1.2 Homophobia is natural due to the sociological origins of prejudiced attitudes. Using the model for racism, we could inquire and analyze the fact that homophobia can be natural; and whatever is natural, can be said to be rational, as naturality is reason. However, naturality may prove a justification for homophobia.1.3 Let one now then inquire into the sociological origins of homophobia; in sociology, the sociological model of prejudice development is described in the following; (1) of perceived threats, which is developed through the kin theory, of (2) the development of negative stereotypes, of (3) discrimination against the perceived threat, of (4) isolation, and of (5) total seclusion and apprehension from normative society.1.31 An analysis of evolutionary biology, of neurology, and of other fields shall attempt to prove this development of homophobia and discrimination normal.1.4 Of (1) perceived threats; firstly, it would be suffice to say that many people infer that threats from homosexual presents problems for their children. There are several theories for the origins of homosexuality, but most imperatively, it is my best interest to show that perceived threats are natural. Firstly, the kin alturism theory, which states that people often help their own kinsmen rather than others, is applied here. Kin alturism here is often confirmed by the fact that the ACC (Anterior Cingular Cortex) is often none-accepting in visible, or subliminal, qualities of people who are "different" from you, or your perceived reality of "conventions" Homosexuals are seen as a threat in three major ways: (1) that of human reproduction, (2) that of perversion and (3) that of tradition, in which Kin Alturism may have a huge a effect on reasons (1) and (3) [1][2]1.41 Of (2) the development of negative stereotypes; it would suffice in providing a psychological explanation of the development of stereotypical behaviour. Accordingly to the theory of the "fundamental attribute error" negative stereotypes may be developed. For example, if a black man steals a car, it would be rational to think that the case of this is "he is evil" but Fundamental Attribute Error leads us to think the opposite; "he is Black" This may be given to the homosexuals too; in a resurgence of the drug Methamphetamine took huge effects on the Homosexual society. Soon, due to this cognitive attitude of the "Fundamental Attribute Error" stereotypes were developed. The Fundamental Attribute Error is an intuitive human behaviour, and is natural; henceforth, it would be easily concluded that the development of stereotypes, which may be turn in homophobia, is natural. [3] 1.42 Of (3) the start of discrimination; this is due to the fact that negative stereotypes, created via fundamental attribute error, which was then created by Kin Altruism, will leave an everlasting effects on the people targeted; at this rate, homosexuals are 7 times more susceptible to drug usage [4]. This is possibly due to stereotype threats. However, there is another dilemma here; that the development of certain stereotypes in facts (like Muslims are terrorists, or Jews are rich) can often lead to prejudice. And when the group is departing the normal conventions of normal, these prejudice are often used against them. Arguments against the "homosexual lifestyle" often derive from the VERY foundations of stereotypes. For example, homosexuals are perverted developed from the maxim that homosexuals often have anal intercourse. These stereotypes, and feelings of prejudice, are natural and normal, due to the fact that the development of stereotypes and perceived fear are natural.Corollary: It can be said that whatever is natural, is just. For homosexuality maybe arguably natural, and it is just, so if homophobia is natural, it is justified. ∴ Homophobia is natural, and henceforth, justifiedPremises Under (2) Freedom of Thought2. Freedom of thought is a natural born human right. 2.1 The Freedom of Thought and of Opinion is protected via the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 18. 2.2 That all humans are born equal is a fact that the world, apart from a minority few, believes in; all humans were born equal, including homophobes. Unless the opposition ought to argue against the fact that homophobes aren't human being, he would have to accept the mere (and possibly sorrowful) reality, that homophobes are human2.3 Every human is, accordingly, entitled to human rights. The exercise of their own human rights in their own way is always just; for if a man becomes a liberal, does one ought to kill him for his beliefs? It is because he has the rights to this belief, is why one should refrain from objecting his "opinion" or "his mode" of thinking unjust. (To make myself clear, this means that man has freedom to believe what he want, and this is just)2.4 To call holding an opinion, a field of thought, or an ideology unjust is unjust in itself, in which it does not seek to create any benefits for the common man. For every man has his rights; and the violation of it cannot ever be just. Every man also has the freedom to express his opinions. Corollary: The rights to hold opinion is just. Homophobia is an opinion. ∴ Every man has the freedom of thought, and as homophobia is a thought, this makes the man just.Premises Under (3) Methods of Pro-Homosexual Groups and the Lack of Control over Perversion in Youth3. The Methods of Pro-Homosexual groups are objectifiable.3.1 These methods include many scences of sexual lack of control; such as shirtless kissing, indecent exposure and many other lack of sexual control have led to many people coming to a strong anti-homosexual basis. This also fuels the "homosexuals are perverted" question, as homosexuals are shown to be very indecently dressed at these parades, kissing and often times touching the penises/vaginas of other homosexuals.3.2 The case study can be seen in the pro-homosexual group, Femen; also an ultrafeminist group, FEMEN has been known for many many things, inclusively, that of being a very indecent exposure group, and that of being very extreme about their ultraliberal beliefs. FEMEN has been known to expose whole bare bodies to passers. This is very objectifiable, and provides fuel for the belief that homosexuals are perverts.3.21 Apart from this, pride parades are a violation of the normal tranquility in society; for pride parade often disrupts the normal life of men, for a cause that has arguably been 3/4th acheived throughout the world.3.3 Apart from this, the Pro-Homosexuality groups are often portrayed as shirtless, perverted hippies; this also presents an influence on the youth. The lack of discipline in the youth can be arguably treated to the objections to the many moral assertions that humanity has made. However, before we go into inquiry about this, we must state that youth premartial sex is rising; mainstream fashion has turned from the highly protective fashion of the early 20th century to a more exposed type of fashion of the current generation. This is a sign of a lack of sexual control.3.31 The origins of these new sexual freedoms can be traced to the sexual openness of the 1970s, in which the homosexual movement was gaining momentum, and was often an offshoot of the feminist/civil rights movement. The liberal attitude of these feminists had so much influence upon the youth, that the legacy of the feminists are carried on subliminally. As many conservatives point out, feminist methods are destroying the traditional family. But as many conservatives have also pointed out, the methods of feminism are disgusting and sexually immoral; this carries on to the pro-homosexual movement as well. Corollary: Homophobia is a reaction against the liberal attitude of feminism, which has corrupted the youth.∴ Homophobia is just in which it fights for less sexual freedoms for the youthPremises Under (4) the Irrationality of Homosexual Intercourse4. It is said that homosexual intercourse is a very irrational thing to do.4.1 For the proccess of reproduction has one goal; to make offspring. But when homosexuals have intercourse, an offspring (naturally) is impossible. Henceforth, there can be one other jusitfication, an immoral one, for homosexual intercourse. This is, of pleasure. When some process is diverted from its main target, it directly becomes immoral.4.2 Let us take the example of exchanges; invented to further human understanding and trade in economics, it has been corrupted to a principle that enslaves men and women alike, in the creation of capitalism. 4.3 For when a plane is diverted from transportation, it is used for war; when selfishness is diverted from kinsmen altruism, it is used for egoistic desires. And when sexual lust is diverted; it is used to gain pleasure.4.4 Pleasure is not always the correct thing to do; homosexuals have a much higher chance of contracting STDs through unprotected anal sex. Apart from this, anal sex often "hurts" (I shall not go further). [5] Pleasure for one, in the face of pain and health issues of another (or both) cannot be rational in any sense. Apart from this, when a proccess is diverted from its real intention, it becomes immoral immediately, as proven in the previous premises.Corollary: Homosexual acts are irrational and immoral, and the opposition to irrationality and immorality is just∴ Homophobia is just due to the fact that homosexual sex is immoral and irrational.Due to time restrictions, I am unable to come up with a better argument. I apologize. THE RES. IS NEGATED Citations: [1] http://tinyurl.com... [2] http://tinyurl.com...;[3] http://tinyurl.com...[4] http://tinyurl.com...[5] http://tinyurl.com...