In Our Modern World Fundamentalist Christianity is More Dangerous Than Fundamentalist Islam

YYW put this very nicely in the comments section. "To affirm this requires a conscious choice to ignore reality." Very well put. I am going to display throughout this debate why PRO's argument doesn't hold water and why the opposite of his motion is true. Firstly I suggest that PRO doesn't insult the voters intelligence by suggesting that these "Christian terror group", he's chose to list, cause more danger and are a bigger threat to the modern world than Islamic Terror groups. I do thank PRO for pointing out that this will not be his main argument and even for telling us why. He said "The damage done by terrorist groups will not be my main point". The reason for this is because there is no comparison between Christian terror groups and Islamic Terror groups. It's like one person drinking a shot of whiskey and another drinking a bottle of whiskey, the amount drank is different and the effect is very different. So although it is not his main argument I suggest he not make this argument at all as it is, quite frankly, ridiculous. Not only is Fundamentalist Islam a greater threat to the modern world but is a bigger danger to other Muslims. ISIS are currently Beheading [1], Crucifying [2], Stoning [3], Chopping children in half [4], performing mass executions [5] not only to Christians"in fact not even mostly to Christians but also and mostly to fellow Muslims. This ISIS problem is not just a problem for Syria and Iraq, it is estimated that 1,500 British Muslims have been recruited by ISIS [6] and are currently abroad fighting for their cause. There are more from mainland Europe and some from North America too. This is sure to have repercussions for the western world when these people attempt to come back (and some will slip through the net), in fact the front page of one of Britain's top selling papers today reports that 100 terror plots are foiled every week in Britain. This news comes just weeks after Britain raised it"s terror alert to severe. Let's not forget about Al-Qaida. I must mention the obvious which is the attacks on September 11th 2001 which claimed the lives of almost 3,000 innocent people including 31 Muslims (not including the hijackers). Between 2004 and 2008 Al-Qaida claimed responsibility for 313 attacks which claimed the lives of 3,010 innocent people, the vast majority of these victims were Muslims with just 12% of the fatalities being westerners. [7] Women are oppressed something awful in countries with extreme Islamic views. Women are regularly beaten and even killed in so called "honor killings". These honor killings take place for various reasons which include being the VICTIM of rape. [8] There are other groups such as Al-Shabaab, Hamas, Boko Haram, which, if I go through all the havoc they've caused, will take a very long time to write and to read. If you are a person who knows the reality of the danger posed by Islamic fundamentalism it seems quite absurd that PRO has chosen to blame the American public for his distorted view that fundamentalist Christians are more dangerous to the world. The reason?... For taking part in a democratic process to elect a leader. Lastly I would like all of the voters to take a look at the references that PRO has given. Not a single one of them are even remotely related to the arguments that were given. They all seem to be home pages to websites 2 of which, at the moment, have stories about Islamic terror. These therefore should not be considered as references and points should be deducted. 1) http://udumakalu.wordpress.com... 2) http://weaselzippers.us... 3) http://www.ibtimes.co.uk... 4) http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com... 5) http://pamelageller.com... 6) http://www.newsweek.com... 7) http://www.spiegel.de... 8)http://www.meforum.org...