An infallible and "always correct" definition for morality cannot be developed.

Due to the forfeited round there are no agreed upon parameters. Based on the criteria previously described, there is an evolutionary basis for an infallible definition for morality: Animals as well as humans exhibit traits of cooperation for the benefit of others. In defining morality on these terms, that is to say, judgments on how a person or animal ought to behave under different circumstances. Morality has evolved through natural selection due to its adaptive effects in promoting the survival of a species. First, the "moral" behavior exhibited by animals (humans included in the term) toward their immediate family and off spring; sharing food, parental care and bonding, as well as aggression against threats from outside forces. Animals are not selfish or ego centric in this regard, therefore behaves morally toward one another. To cause harm within a family group can be seen as immoral. Not to behave morally in this context would lead to the demise of familial members, decreasing further reproduction of the species. Evolutionary morality defined: Life sustaining and/or cooperative behaviors toward other individuals in a familial group. Culturally, defining morality would be in terms of a single societal group as a second tier expansion of evolutionary morality; mores specific to civic morality with the aim to maintain social order for the health of a whole community. A single culture or religion must be selected to establish an infallible definition, where it applies to this society alone. Example: At present in the US, our culture finds it immoral to burn a witch. We understand that the term and identification of a witch is subjective, and claims that such a person causes harm to our social order or community health has no merit. Yet cultures in non-industrialized areas of the world, the burning of witches is still practiced as a moral imperative to rid the community of the evil spirits or to curtail negative events that have affected that community. Drought, locus, crop failure and the like, is attributed to the accused and must be disposed of for order to return. Morality, its applied meaning, and thought process in defining morality differs from one culture to another. To construct an infallible universal definition of morality, one needs to establish a minimum common consensus devoid of constraints from national, cultural or religious dogma. Morality and ethics has been debated since the start of human thought and is topical; self, environmental, social justice, international relations, and business ethics, etc. Also there are different ideological camps that various philosophers ascribe. I don"t wish to delve into that pool because results will be tit for tat quotations from Socrates to Epicurus, Western verses Oriental philosophies to infinitum. What ultimately enables morality to be defined is "good or bad;" even though the concepts of what a good or bad action is, is explained within individual cultures. Morality as discussed before is a combination of biological evolution and cultural rules. The definition needs to be broad enough to allow the different sectors of society to plug into it. Morality: To cause harm is bad. Concern for others in an effort to avoid harming is good.