Should we let black people handle their dirty work

My opponent stated: "and since nobody uses that kind of bullcrap invention, and nobody gives two sh"ts about that monkey garrett morgan so it is an irrelevant point." Did he just say nobody uses that crap (meaning the traffic light)? I would like to think almost every single nation on the face of the planet uses traffic lights to organize traffic. My opponent stated: "Hiu also had to audacity to mention something dumb as well pointing out that "According to one source colonialism was one of the many causes of devastations of various ethnic people" First of all, this just shows that whites are superior to other ethnic groups, because we are colonizing their territory and not vice versa. Also indians are irrelevant and dirtmonkeys in todays society. The government doesn't care about those mojenjotawokicherokeewapanoag motherfuckers." My point in citing colonialism was to highlight that in actuality the advent of colonialism, did more harm than good and many whites who "expanded" their influence needed these "monkeys" and "indians to build their nations which their own citizens could not do on their own. As far as white European countries not being conquered, I guess you had forgotten the Turks and the Mongols who inhabited European lands for hundreds of years. My opponent said: "This autistic being also tried to counter my point of crime rates in black scum neighborhoods but just pointed to statistics showing that 94% of black people were killed by blacks, WHICH PROVES MY POINT. (A bad thing about this is that only 6% of blacks are being killed by whites *sad face*)" Actually if you go back, you are talking about black crime rates. The point was to highlight that people who are of the same demographic tend to kill each other because you live in close proximity. This has nothing to do with "black crime" because that would suggest these crimes would have racial undertones. I believe my opponent left out the fact that between 1980 and 2008 84 percent of homicides were "white-on-white." Now before my opponent goes into a rampage and responds with (wait my opponent cannot respond because I have the last say, nevermind) "well there are more whites" the fact of the matter is if the discussion of so-called black-on-black crime is going to be discussed then we too must address the many whites who tend to kill other whites. According to one source: "WHITE PEOPLE KILL MORE MEMBERS OF VULNERABLE POPULATIONS THAN ANY OTHER RACE Vulnerable populations are generally defined as children and the elderly. Family members and significant others are also often targets of homicide, rather than random victims. FBI homicide statistics from 1980 to 2008 show that white people are, by the numbers, far more likely to kill children and the elderly than any other race. Additionally, white people commit more sex-related and gang-related homicides than any other race." Also..... homicidebyrace FBI homicide statistics, 1980-2008 GANG MURDERS ARE MOST COMMON AMONG WHITE GANGS "While a lot of attention has been given to the gang-related homicides in Chicago"s predominantly-black South side, very little press has been devoted to covering the epidemic of white-on-white gangland murders. As the above chart demonstrates, the majority of gang-related homicides are committed by white people (53.3 percent white, 42.2 percent black), and the majority of white gang murder victims are also white (56.5 percent white, 40 percent black). Have this fact handy the next time someone bemoans "black-on-black" gang violence." Source: http://usuncut.com... My opponent said: "Again my opponent just gives evidence proving my point, that black people are unqualified to the jobs when he said that " White names triggered a callback rate that was 50% higher than that of equally qualified black applicants." and "their study indicated that improving the qualifications of applicants benefited white applicants but not blacks, thus leading to a wider racial gap in response rates for those with higher skill." My opponent is intectually dishonest by leaving out the fact that blacks when compared to whites with the same qualifications, received less call backs due to the SOUND OF THEIR NAMES, not necessarily skill. The study clearly highlights that both black and white applicants had the same qualifications the only difference was their name, not their skill. My opponent said: "Also yes I am a proponent of genocide for animals, its called extinction." Clearly my opponent in this entire discussion to which he deflected and could not refute my information is full of obvious hate. I have not only demonstrated that his position is not only racist, it bears no fact in reality. Clearly blacks are not animals since we do have many affluent Africans and African-Americans that contribute greatly to society. My opponents denial of successful blacks and their contribution to society is nothing short of delusional to which he has articulated that hate like that of a child (notice he said I had autism spectrum disorder) and little does my opponent know, is that there are succesful people in society that has autism. At the end of the day this debate was pretty much a slam dunk and I am sure most people would vote favorably for my arguments since my opponent provided little to no support for his position. Sadly there are many people that think like my opponent, however my opponent wants to think like me (e.g. His usage of the phrase "My opponent" in this round). Although my opponet has racist views it is quite comical because it really highlights his juevenile mentality...... BTW to my opponent: I am black, about to receive my second masters degree and I am also a medical professional and you lost to some random black guy in a debate........