Videos for people is great.

1: Don't say you win automatically. The people decide, not you. 2: "Videos for people is the best Youtube channel I have ever uncovered" is not an argument, it is all about you, so it is biased. 3:"He is a hidden genius. I have never seen any videos like his and I don't think there ever will be anything like his. They are completely unique." I cannot give specific examples admittedly, but there are others like him who are more popular, he might have a slightly different spin on things but he is in no way unique. 4:"This isn't too complex, just a simple little sketch, but it's still highly entertaining. It brings up a problematic moral dilemma and asks us what we would do about it, even though the moral dilemma is unsolvable. It might also, perhaps, be seen as a satirization of the guilt trips that charity organizations hand us every day. The vocabulary used is highly accurate and indicates a good level of intelligence in the medical field." this is common knowledge, not something impressive. And the idea that people should not kill anything is obviously flawed through the butterfly effect. What matters is the act of attempting to save as many lives as possible, should we just let those near us die because we can't save everything? 5:"Once more, a high intellect at work. He not only talks about one of the greatest achievements of mankind, he also makes fun of it in an extremely dark and malicious way. Although it's pessimistic, and somewhat depressing, it's still a comment on humanity and very fun to look at. The symbolism captured in the images can be hard to grasp at first, but it becomes relatively easy the more you look at it. He also, again, brings up a strong moral dilemma." he is not talking about mans greatest achievements, he is talking about the greatest follies of man. He attempts to say that we should show all the bad as well as the good, but first impressions are important so by showing what we have accomplished before talking about our setbacks we lessen the blow to others, so this point is fairly invalid. 6:This one, I like to think, was not fully developed, but, rather, produced after the title. It's bizarre, true, but still pretty funny. Just as good as anything from a sketch comedy show, but nobody knows about it. It's a funny version of The Matrix, and, judging by the way the characters literally talk about The Matrix, it takes place in a world where The Matrix is available. The video game, while fictional, would still be compelling as an actual video game. The best part, though, is the thirty second shot where the protagonist is greeted by an empty black void filled with random computer text. Not only does it make the existential crisis seem more real, since even the character's speech bubble is not normal, it also gives the viewer a sense of pathetic hopelessness. After that shot, it gets a bit depressing, and morbid, but retains some comedic value." This is an incredibly played out theme. The idea of "character from some sort of media realizes he does not matter" is seen in many other places, one good example being Deadpool kills the marvel universe which shows nearly the same idea but with a different reaction. 7:This is one of his earlier videos. In his early days, he would not do sketches with stick figures very often. Instead, he would simply discuss things. Not quite as funny as the others, but, still, a good way to while away a minute. He's not trying to be funny here, really, and this is very apparent, he's simply trying to give us a speech, and see what we think. The movie posters in the background, though, are well done and illustrate brilliantly the two schools of thought he's trying to get across. He also insists that he's not racist, which is always a nice touch for people who don't understand what racism is. "I agree that he is not being racist, but he is actively attempting to make people think he is by walking on the line, at that point he is just attempting to annoy those he doesn't like more than anything else. 8:"This one is one of his first, and, although he has no idea what he's doing here, we can still see the brilliant streak of comedy within him. The topic is not complex, not controversial, not even that funny. It's so obscure that we have a hard time figuring out what situation this topic could possibly apply to. But he treats it as if it was controversial, and we see his opinions on things, and how they differ from ours. The picture in which the character tastes it, in particular, conveys what it would actually feel like. We feel inspired to drink some ourselves, and so he's succeeded in opening our minds. Simple." I don't understand why you would consider this something worth talking about, he is talking about drinking lemon juice, I did that a long time ago, you may have not but people who watch the video will not likely be inclined to drink it because he makes it seem controversial. People have no reason to listen to someone actively making controversy out of nothing. 9:" Anyway, I hope to see another compelling argument from you, a few paragraphs long, maybe covering why the 5 videos above actually suck. I await your next argument." the videos are average, possibly sub-par. They don't suck, they just express ideas that people usually think of later in life. You would have thought the exact same things when you get older, you just had someone attempt to make them funny and somewhat succeed. 10: To conclude, Videos for People is an average channel that is not underappreciated, he just is not that clever. The person running the channel attempts to get the watcher to think, but most people who have watched that have already seen a more popular version of it or have already thought about that earlier in life. I don't know how old you are (I would assume you are fairly young) but this channel has nothing to get people to want to watch it. To be honest your reviews of them were the most interesting part of them. So I would have to say he is not great, rather he seems to be a normal person who does not really have anything new or original, he is below average for what I have seen. 11: I would like to state now that saying "I like him" will not support your argument, this argument just does not seemingly have a real good answer to it. There is no real evidence to put in it, it just is personal opinion mixed with reviews.