agnostic/deist vs christian/catholic debunking creationism on biblical text.

Introduction I just want to reiterate. My argument doesn't have to be convincing. My argument need only be logical. If my opponent can't show any logical fallacies, than I have proven that a logical argument exists for an infinitely intelligent creator God. I also would like to request voters attribute no source points to either me or my opponent. We will both use a lot of philosophical arguments that won't require sourcing. Crash Course in Modal Logic Since my argument relies on modal logic, it is important that voters have at the least a very basic understanding of what modal logic is. Modal logic consists of 4 propositions. Possible Possibility deals with what is logically possible, not physically possible. If something isn't logically impossible, than it is logically possible. For example the Flying Spaghetti Monster is logically possible (as far as I can tell). So, it is possibly true. Impossible Something is impossible, if it can't logically exist. A triangle with 4 sides would be logically impossible and therefore couldn't exist. Necessary Necessary propositions are ones that must be true and can't be false. For example 2 2=4 and can't be false. Contingent Contingent possibilities are ones that could be true but could also be false. For example Obama is president of the United State is true, but it could have been false. So it is contingently true. Al Gore was not president of the United States is false, but it could have been true so it is contingently false. Possible Worlds Possible worlds is just another way of representing what is possible. If I say the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists in some possible worlds and not in others, than all I'm saying is that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is possible. Ontological Argument for the Existence of God. (Borrowed from Alvin Plantiga and various other people) Premise 1 It is possible a greatest possible being exists. There are no logical absurdities here or contradictions. If my opponent can prove this premise wrong then the whole argument falls apart. So far in the history of mankind this has yet to be done so good luck. Premise 2 Necessarily, if a greatest possible being exists he must be omnipotent and omniscient. If it wasn't omnipotent and omniscient then a greater possible being could exist in some possible worlds. Premise 3 If the concept of the greatest possible being is coherent it exists in some possible worlds. Premise 4 If a greatest possible being exists in some possible worlds it exists in all possible worlds. It exists in all possible worlds because it is a necessary truth and not a contingent truth. Premise 5 If the greatest possible being exists in all possible worlds, he exists in the actual world. Premise 6 The greatest possible being exists and by definition is God. It is omniscient and omnipotent. Logically Valid The argument is logically valid. Here is the mathematical proof here: http://jwwartick.com...... "Ax=df x is maximally great Bx=df x is maximally excellent W (Y) =df Y is a universal property Ox = df x is omniscient, omnipotent, and morally perfect 1) `74; (W07;x)Ax pr 2) `33;(x)(Ax iff `33;Bx) pr 3) `33;(x)(BxX35;Ox) pr 4) (Y)[W(Y) iff (`33;(W07;x)Yx W44; (`33;~(W07;x)Yx)] pr 5) (Y)[(W07;Z)`33;(x)(Yx iff `33;Zx)X35; W(Y)] pr 6) (W07;Z)`33;(x)(Ax iff `33;Zx) 2, Existential Generalization 7) [(W07;Z)`33;(x)(Ax iff `33;Zx)X35;W(A)] 5, Universal Instantiation 8 ) W(A) iff (`33;(W07;x)Ax W44; (`33;~(W07;x)Ax) 4, Universal Instantiation 9) W (A) 6, 7 Modus Ponens 10) W(A)X35; (`33;(W07;x)Ax W44; (`33;~(W07;x)Ax) 8, Equivalence, Simplification 11) `33;(W07;x)Ax (`33;~(W07;x)Ax) 9, 10 Modus Ponens 12) ~`74;~~(W07;x)Ax W44; (`33;(W07;x)Ax) 11, Communication, Modal Equivalence 13) `74;(W07;x)Ax X35; `33;(W07;x)Ax Double Negation, Impl 14) `33;(W07;x)Ax 1, 13 Modus Ponens 15) `33;(x)(Ax iff `33;Bx) X35; (`33;(W07;x)Ax X35; `33;(W07;x)`33;Bx) theorem 16) `33;(W07;x)`33;Bx 14, 15 Modus Ponens (twice) 17) `33;(x)(Bx X35; Ox) X35; (`33;(W07;x)`33;Bx X35; `33;(W07;x)`33;Ox theorem 18) `33;(W07;x)`33;Bx 16, 17 Modus Ponens (twice) 19) (W07;x)`33;Bx 18, Necessity Elimination" Pro can't argue that this is not logically valid, only that it isn't logically sound. I will focus on rebuttals in the next round. Necessary Creator Any evidence for a simulated universe is evidence for a creator. Premise 1- The universe is literally a hologram. It's a projection of information from a flat surface. Nothing you see around you is real. Everything is just a holographic image projected from a flat surface. Science is just now starting to understand this. http://www.nature.com... Premise 2- Observer bias, helps prove we are in a simulated universe as well. Matter acts different when we don't pay attention to it. When we look away from matter it acts like a wave of possibility. However, when we observe matter it acts solid. We see it what It does and how it behaves. This short video may explain it better. http://m.youtube.com... Premise 3- The universe is pixelated. Just like a video game our universe is pixelated. We are clearly living in a simulated universe. http://www.naturalnews.com... Premise 4- Human DNA is really just computer code. It's a way to store information. It's not a natural process, but unnatural and the obvious creation of a higher being. http://www.telegraph.co.uk... Christian God is the tri-omni God of the MOA. 1. God is omnipotent. "This is, perhaps, the easiest of the three to answer: Yes, God is omnipotent! There is even a verse that, in the King James Version and New King James Version, uses this very word: "Alleluia! For the Lord God Omnipotent reigns!" (Revelation 19:6)." 2. God is omniscient. "The Bible tells us that God does perceive all things, which means that no fact can be hidden from His knowledge. As King David recognized: "Indeed, the darkness shall not hide from You, but the night shines as the day; the darkness and the light are both alike to You" (Psalm 139:12). God sees all things, and nothing can be hidden from His knowledge"not even the secret intentions of the heart (Psalm 44:21). In fact, He understands our own intentions better than we do (cf. Jeremiah 17:9-10; Hebrews 4:12)! As Paul explains, "there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are naked and open to the eyes of Him to whom we must give account" (Hebrews 4:13)." 3. God is omnibenevolent. "Who is God? Notice that God is love: 8 God is love (1 John 4:8). Also notice that there is no fear of judgment in love: 16 And we have known and believed the love that God has for us. God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God, and God in him. 17 Love has been perfected among us in this: that we may have boldness in the day of judgment; because as He is, so are we in this world. 18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves torment (1 John 4:16-18)." (Quotes on trio no God taken from http://www.cogwriter.com... )