No-one can understand someone better than the person him/herself

I accept. I define the resolution as such: can: the ability to or capacity to fulfil an action; the probability, plausibility or probability of an event[1]. e.g. "John can become a movie star if he puts his mind to it, becomes good looking, gains a better memory and stops being a fish"; "Can, can you do the can-can, can you do the can-can, can ya can ya can ya can ya" ; "Can you stop punching me?"; or to quote Edgar Albert Guest: "Can't is the worst word that's written or spoken; Doing more harm here than slander and lies; On it is many a strong spirit broken, And with it many a good purpose dies. It springs from the lips of the thoughtless each morning And robs us of courage we need through the day: It rings in our ears like a timely-sent warning And laughs when we falter and fall by the way. Can't is the father of feeble endeavor, The parent of terror and half-hearted work; It weakens the efforts of artisans clever, And makes of the toiler an indolent shirk. It poisons the soul of the man with a vision, It stifles in infancy many a plan; It greets honest toiling with open derision And mocks at the hopes and the dreams of a man. Can't is a word none should speak without blushing; To utter it should be a symbol of shame; Ambition and courage it daily is crushing; It blights a man's purpose and shortens his aim. Despise it with all of your hatred of error; Refuse it the lodgment it seeks in your brain; Arm against it as a creature of terror, And all that you dream of you some day shall gain. Can't is the word that is foe to ambition, An enemy ambushed to shatter your will; Its prey is forever the man with a mission And bows but to courage and patience and skill. Hate it, with hatred that's deep and undying, For once it is welcomed 'twill break any man; Whatever the goal you are seeking, keep trying And answer this demon by saying: "I can."" one: an individual or person of previous or later reference, the subject predicated on this article, or the self. For example "If one were to shoot you, one would probably be looked in prison" orone:no person; not a single person[2] person: a human being regarded as an individual subject to the Human Rights conventions. This is the "average" person, and not a magic kind of person that is one in 3.252 billion. understand:Understanding(also calledintellection) is apsychologicalprocessrelated to an abstract or physical object, such as aperson, situation, ormessagewhereby one is able to think about it and useconceptsto deal adequately with that object. Understanding is a relation between the knower and an object of understanding. Understanding implies abilities and dispositions with respect to an object of knowledge sufficient to support intelligent behavior. However:If we use the termconceptas above, the question then arises as to what is a concept? Is it anabstractthing? Is it abrainpattern or arule? Whatever definition is proposed, we can still ask how it is that we understand the thing that is featured in the definition: we can never satisfactorily define aconcept, still less use it to explain understanding. It may be more convenient to use an operational orbehaviouraldefinition, that is, to say that "somebody who reacts appropriately toxunderstandsx". For example, one understandsSwahiliif one correctly obeys commands given in that language. This approach, however, may not provide an adequate definition. A computer can easily be programmed to react appropriately to commands, but there is a disagreement as to whether or not the computerunderstandsthe language. According tosocionicsresearcherRostislav Persion: In thecognitivemodel presented byMBTI, the process of introvertedthinking(Ti) is thought to represent understanding through cause and effect relationships or correlations. One can construct a model of a system by observing correlations between all the relevant properties (e.g. The output of aNAND gaterelative to its inputs). This allows the person to generate truths about the system and then to apply the model to demonstrate his or her understanding. A mechanic for example may randomly, or algorithmically probe the inputs and outputs of ablack boxto understand the internal components through the use of induction.INTP,ISTP,ESTP, andENTPall use Ti and are usually the best of the 16 types at understanding their material environment in a bottom-up manner. These types may enjoymechanicsand digitalelectronicsbecause of the 1 to 1 correlation between cause and effect relationships in these fields. Understanding is not limited to these types however as other types demonstrate an identical process, although in other planes of reality; ie. Social, Theological and Aesthetic. A potential reason for the association of understanding with the former personality types is due to a social phenomenon for asymmetrical distribution of gratification. In the field ofengineering, engineers probe or study the inputs and outputs of components to understand their functionality. These components are then combined based on their functionality (similar tocomputer programming) to create a larger, more complex system. This is the reason why engineers attempt to subdivide ideas as deep as possible to obtain the lowest level of knowledge. This makes their models more detailed and flexible. It may be useful to know the formulas that govern an ideal gas, but to visualise the gas as being made up of small moving particles, which are in turn made up of even smaller particles, is true understanding. People who are understanding (through the use of Ti) usually value objects and people based on usefulness, as opposed to the people who useextroverted thinking(Te) who view people or things as having a worth. In order to test one's understanding it is necessary to present a question that forces the individual to demonstrate the possession of a model, derived from observable examples of that model's production or potential production (in the case that such a model did not exist beforehand). Rote memorization can present an illusion of understanding, however when other questions are presented with modified attributes within the query, the individual cannot create a solution due to a lack of a deeper representation of reality. Another significantpoint of view holds that knowledge is the simple awareness of bits of information. Understanding is the awareness of the connection between the individual pieces of this information. It is understanding which allows knowledge to be put to use. Therefore, understanding represents a deeper level than simple knowledge. Gregory Chaitin, a noted computer scientist, propounds a view that comprehension is a kind of data compression.In his essay "The Limits of Reason", he argues thatunderstandingsomething means being able to figure out a simple set of rules that explains it. For example, weunderstandwhy day and night exist because we have a simple model—the rotation of the earth—that explains a tremendous amount of data—changes in brightness, temperature, and atmospheric composition of the earth. We havecompresseda large amount of information by using a simple model that predicts it. Similarly, weunderstandthe number 0.33333... by thinking of it as one-third. The first way of representing the number requires an infinite amount of memory; but the second way can produce all the data of the first representation, but uses much less information. Chaitin argues thatcomprehensionis this ability to compress data.[3] My general argument shall be that all knowledge one can gleam from another person can be learnt through psychological techniques and examination. Further, the average person can learn of all these psychological techniques. They are also privy to certainty regarding their own motivations, unlike others which have to guess. Thus, the individual themselfcanbe more certain, and thus know more, than anyone else regarding themselves. 1 -http://www.thefreedictionary.com... 2 -https://www.google.co.uk... 3 - wiki