Republican vs Democrat = Mommy and Daddy fighting about money!

Note: Just to clarify to anyone following this debate, my response to the original topic of conversation is a little less than halfway down my portion of this round. It's been marked with an asterisk. I've been trying to move the argument forward, but due to the reasons listed in the rest of this section (and some in my last), it's been a bugger trying to do so."...I have had debates that actually became descent discussions. It seems to work just fine when the person I'm debating understands context..."Yeah. A handful. And as for it working just fine, they weren't really debates, so much as you and someone else agreeing on a stance. Furthermore, you have won only one debate. About half the others were people being confused by your wordings, and you calling people names without any reference to the original debates. And the irony behind the mis-speech, "descent debates" is delicious."I still feel as if you attacked me right out of the gate, which wasted these 3 rounds over a pee pee contest."Okay, take any of my statements from our first round and tell me which one was an attack on you. Go ahead. Yeah, there's some minor joking, pointing out inconsistencies, but nothing blatantly offensive. And good God, quit talking like a 12-year-old. It's embarrassing."Just because I did not take a debate class doesn't mean I am not allowed to participate. [From the comments section]: I have seen the worst criticisms from people on this website because people are hung up on competition and ego stroking."Hey, look in the address bar. It's up top, there, and it shows the website you're on. You know what it says? www.debate.org. Not "Let's just talk.org" or "I wanna complain, who's with me?.org". Debate.org. You come here wanting to have a discussion while having them masquerade as debates, and then when people challenge you to the best of their ability, you have a hissy fit. That's the complete and absolute point to this website. "I hardly asked for my 9th grade debate teacher to respond to this rant." No, but you did come to this site to argue with people as best as the both of you could, right? If it's just circle-jerking your opinions, then what's the point? "I have not figured out if anyone here actually have something to say or are just taking out there frustrations like me." That's because it's confusing as Hell trying to tell if you want to debate, or talk, or complain, or just ramble. If you're ADD as you say you are (or if that's just what you say to cover up your horrendous sporadic nonsense), then you have to expect people to not follow you. That's common sense and common courtesy.*Our leaders are fighting each other instead of working together. They are wasting valuable recourse's battling each other instead of fixing problems. Then I went on about how it is our fault. We are greedy and as long as we get what we want we could care less about anyone else... How is that incoherent nonsense?"It's that, in combination with your "ADD"-engendered, arbitrary, circuitous maundering. And with those points, now we're getting somewhere. But I already addressed all of this already in Round 2:"People aren't just animals. We belong to clubs and organizations because they share our interests. That's all. Not because we hate other people. I agree, we should not hate other groups, but it's only human nature to disagree with people. That's not the bad thing like you make it out to be... There are only a few ways such a large country can handle its finances. These two schools of thought- Democrats and Republicans- have very different ideologies when it comes to the financial situation. Our country is 16 trillion dollars in debt. That's a lot. Like, a lot a lot. And that's a vast understatement. This is a problem we have to fix soon, so forgive D's/R's for being a tad uncivil when it comes to trying to fix the problem instead of being buddy-buddy and watching our country go down the drain."But God forbid you actually try to respond to the debate. So there it is, my argument, all laid out for you. Clear as day, just like it was in the last round. Respond to that now, otherwise I'll know you're not reading these responses and just assuming you know what the opposing side has to say. "We are greedy and as long as we get what we want we could care less about anyone else." Then do something about it. Where's that "Tyler Durden spirit," you wannabe? I can't believe I'm holding an argument with someone who treats Fight Club like a Bible."Its as if you were not aware of current events if you cannot understand my frustrations regardless of how vague my comments were."What, like the money situation? I'm not an idiot. But there are a lot of current events. You say that as if our country's the only one that matters or something, or that it only has one issue. Newsflash, slick: It's not. Look at my previous point. That is my response to your whole disjointed argument. I asked for clarification, got none, and so I assumed that point would cover it. Sorry if that's wrong, but when you won't push the debate ahead and instead make "pee pee" jokes, it's hard to move it forward myself."I do not give you that authority..."You say that as if you could anyways."I am not interested in how big your genitalia is!" Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I rest my case.