Why do people think that God is not real

Pro has not given a set of rules nor definitions for this debate. I will thus start my arguments in R1. Firstly to definitions. God is defined as the locus of creation and all it contains. He/they/she/it (it used for convenience) is unseeable, Unknowable, Immutable, Timeless, Spaceless, All loving, All good, All powerful and all knowing conscious entity, That is maximally free to act and that seeks a special relationship with humanity, With which it imbues freewill. God is a hypothesis proposed by various religious thinking as an explanation to unknown answers of a Universal origins and immaterial existence. Hopefully I have not wrongly defined god, And it is acceptable to Pro. But given Pro did not define god I feel entitled to do so. I offer 3 arguments for the non-existence of god. 1) Argument from the Primacy of Existence. Existence, Exists and is an objective reality. Denial of existence is both self- refuting and commits the fallacy of the stolen concept. Consciousness exists and is the identification of "existents" within existence itself. To be conscious, Is to be conscious of something. Thus existence is prime, Absolute, Objective and precedes consciousness. This gives the god hypothesis 2 problems: 1) consciousness (a god) cannot be either a-temporal or a precursor to existence. This would require god to be unconscious, But the claim is that it is conscious. 2) the god hypothesis requires that IT can change existence at a whim. But existence is prime and objective and denying it is a fallacy. Believing in god effectively is the same as believing you live in a cartoon that a master cartoonist can whimsically change. Thus the concepts themselves used to bootstrap god concepts would be subjective (and thus inconsistent). The God concept effectively self destructs. 2) Argument from the meaningless of the god concept. All existents within existence have positively identified primary fundamental attributes (material), Secondary (powerful) and tertiary-relational attributes (creator). These have meaning against the framework of existence so in the bracketed examples this may describe Marcus Aurelius a Roman Emperor and himself described as a god. However god has no positively identified primary attributes. IT is immaterial, Timeless, Spaceless, Immutable, Invisible, Unknowable etc - all negative attributes telling us what a god is not, And not what a god is. However we are left (given ITs definition) to conclude it is a void existing within a void and is thus non-existent. 3)Argument from inconsistent properties. The god concept is replete with contradictions. Contradictions cannot exist (Aristotles law of non-contradiction). Just to pick out one. The god concept is said to be maximally free and all good. But being maximally free requires god to be able to choose evil and thus IT can either be free or good but not both. There are of course many others and this isn"t meant an exhaustive list. The above points are not intended to be fully fleshed out philosophical speaking given space restrictions. If true they constitute positive reasons to reject the god hypothesis in favor of atheism. The arguments are not inductive, But deductive. If true then god does not exist.