God Cannot Possibly be Omnipotent

Heh, I've always wanted to debate this, I just thought if I was to take on philochristos or zmikecuber on this, I would be absolutely demolished, so this could be an interest bit of practice. I have always had a strong opinion about this.The Problem of the Omnipotence Paradox The omnipotence paradox is your argument. Fine, I understand your case. But, this issue has an underlying problem, which all arguments do. This is that the paradox comes with a flawed presupposed notion for God. Let me use the example of your first paradox. The door. So your question was that, "can God make a door which he cannot pass through?" Now, if you accept that he is omnipotent, then he can. But then, if he can't do something, then he is not omnipotent.But my answer for this is simple. God can create this door, but he is also able to pass through it, and not pass through it. Okay, it isn't simple but think about it. If God is omnipotent, he is able to do everything, including break the idea of logic. God will create this door, but he both can and cannot pass through it. God is able to create this door and pass through it, and not pass through it, at the same time. This means that overall, he can do both create a door he can't pass through it, and pass through it.The reason at first it doesn't seem to make sense is that logic does not allow this. But accepting the premise of an omnipotent, transcendent God means he is outside of logic, and outside of the universe. The presupposed notions that this paradox comes with is that you can only either create said door which you can't pass through, or be able to pass through the door. God, being omnipotent by definition can do both.How? Well that cannot be understood by human logic, but by definition, he can. So let me take your other two paradoxes.God doesn't have "time", per say as he was always "is". But I will re-phrase the argument as, "can God unmake himself". If he can, then he isn't God as he can be in a state of non-existence, and then cannot do anything. But if he can't, he isn't omnipotent. The answer is, he can both make himself not exist, yet exist at the same time, by definition of omnipotence. He can both be a God in the state of non-existence and exist at the same time, so he can still be omnipotent.With the final paradox, the same applies. I do love this paradox though. Effectively, if God cursed himself, if he can't revert it, he is not all powerful. If he can, then the curse didn't work and he is not all powerful. The answer for this, is the same. He both can create a curse which cannot be reversed, as well as reverse it.This is confusing, and to any readers, it will not make any sense at first. But you have to think about it carefully. The large issue which is a secondary problem with this argument is that it dictates omnipotence cannot surpass logic. If we take, "omnipotent", then it is all powerful and omnipotence means that God is of infinite power and can do abslutely anything at the same time. Absolutely anything. This includes, breaking the law of logic and not breaking the laws of logic at the same time.This includes, doing this out of human understanding and not at the same time. By accepting the definition of omnipotence, he can do anything. Even if God contradicts himself, he can both contradict himself yet still be all powerful by the definition of omnipotence. There can still be a contradiction and not a contradiction at the same time. All of this makes no sense, but by the definition of omnipotence, he therefore must be able to do it.So in short, the problem with this paradox of omnipotence is that it states firstly omnipotence must be within the realms of logic, and that a contradiction means he isn't. Well, by the definition of omnipotence, it does not have to be within logic, and he can do anything, including contradict himself and still be omnipotent. I await your response.