The U.S. should leave south Korea

please excuse me I do policy debate not LD so if this is a little sketchy than work with me here thank you..this of course is the new policy debate topic for the 2010-11 season...the plan text is as follows Resolved: the United states federal government(USFG) should substantially reduce its military and/or police presence in South Korea. Since in Policy we run topicality i shall instead offer definitions for the sake of the debate 1.Reduce as defined by merriam websters Dictionary -to diminish in size, amount, extent, or number- (1.http://www.merriam-webster.com...) 2. presence as defined by merriam websters dictionary- something present of a visible or concrete nature(2.http://www.merriam-webster.com...) -Now that definitions are out of the way i shall start on contentions...like I said again i am a policy debater, so I would first like to offer Inherency(whats is going on right now at the moment or the status quo in other words) before i get on with contentions. This evidence comes directly from this link (http://www.angus-reid.com...) -There are currently 28,000 thousand troops in South Korea...the card in 2005 is a bit old so the number of troops changed the mutual ideas and feeling of the South Koreans have not been changed...nearly 54% of all South Koreans want the U.S. to leave South Korea saying that the u.s. offers no help to the peninsulas reunification but strains it..also read from this more recent 2010 article (http://www.commondreams.org...) Obama is saying he is going to keep U.S troops in south korea for the foreseeable future which means the U.S. wont be leaving any time soon. Moving on to contentions Contention-1 Nuclear war A.The North Koreans are absolutely ticked that were sitting in South Korea right now like a bunch of freeloaders, North Korea has even gone far enough to state that South Korea it self is a traitor for allowing U.S. troops to aid them. B.The U.S. right now is acting like a tripwire for North Korea any funny business and North Korea is able willing and ready (prolification) to start a full on attack on the U.S. (B..idahostatesman.com/2010/05/25/1240041/will-north-koreas-saber-rattling.html#ixzz0s0h0em1f; ) C. If Korea launches a Nuclear war the results could be extinction, North Korea runs advanced prolification (or Nuclear construction) they also hold many nuclear missiles, the after-conflict after America has stepped on the "tripwire" could be disastrous, whole metropolitan cities could disappear in days, U.S. and Korea could lead a global nuclear conflict people....look me in the eye and tell me that isn't bad.(c.http://nautilus.org...) This is my second contention and my last (I wanna keep this shot and sweet) Contention 2 is Sex Trafficking D. For clarification i offer the following definition of Sex Trafficking(D.http://www.bayswan.org...) -sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age; or The term `sex trafficking' means the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for the purpose of a commercial sex act.- E. Sex Trafficking is dehumanizing South Korea, sex trafficking is strong around U.S. military bases which suspiciously seems to slip out of the hands of the pentagons 2004 strict policy on sex trafficking, U.S. troops are currently stationed in bases all around South Korea, they are visiting brothels, bars, and "massage parlours" and have sex with 10 year old prostitutes who were sold to them for currency, this completely demoralizes Korea and adds even more harsh conflict between U.S. and Korea, also it directly links to my first contention, the major impact of Sex Trafficking could be Nuclear War. Thats it please, if you are some goofy person trying to be mean and accepting challenges and not responding to them, I mean for this to be a serious debate so please lets make it one, I look forward to the debate =)