Any topic!

The Bible describes the aspects of God. Omniscience - Job 37:16, Psalm 147:5, 1 Samuel 2:3, Isaiah 55:9, Job 28:24, Isaiah 46:9; Omnipotence - Genesis 17:1-2, 1 Samuel 2:3, 1 Samuel 16:17, Matthew 6:4, Acts 2:23. Omnipresence - Proverbs 15:3, Jeremiah 23:24, Psalm 139:7-10, Colossians 1:27. These are the references for which I made the claim of God's qualities. The Bible does explain the nature of God, and is proof of God, because of God's qualities. The Validity of the Bible is true because the existence of God is true. Regarding my opponents dismissals and over simplification of Omnipotence in relation to my argument, I quote Rene Descartes "Here I do not know what sort of thing you want existence to be, or why it cannot be said to be a property like omnipotence - provided of course, we take word property to stand for any attribute, or from whatever can be predicated on a thing" Meditations on first philosophy. God has a necessary existence, for if you define things by their properties as to validate their existence then we must also conclude that God's very existence is allowed by his qualities. A table exist because it has definable properties that make it a table. God exists because it has definable properties that make him God. My opponent's argument "God cannot be omnipotent because what would happen if God created a rock that cannot be moved by God. Could he move it? " This doesn't disprove anything because you are negating the very qualities of Omnipotence. All powerful. God has infinite power, and we know from mathematical theory the laws of infinite are both irrational, unreal and real. It is false to state that Infinite doesn't exist, because it's very definition requires that it exists (to be referred to later). There has to be a number that can continue after a series of numbers because logic demands it. Yet the properties of Infinite are unlimited, I refer to the argument of the "Infinite Hotel paradox." Because we know God is all powerful, as described of his nature, God's "all powerfulness" allows him to exist by his own power. Onto God's Omniscience isn't disputable either, because it'a very definition allows for it to know all things. Man can have free will, from man's perspective. I can believe that what I do on my own accord is of my own and no force compels me to do so, because I compel myself. Yet the very definition of an Infinite knowledge account for all my actions. So, while I am assured of my free will; i cannot logically deduce that an Omniscient being could not know what I am doing, will do, or have done. God's Omnipresence, again follows the same arguments as stated above. Though we cannot perceive God, the very definition that he encompasses all things proves itself. Summary: God has been presented to we(humans) through personal accounts as recorded in the Bible. The very cultures in our world that claim the faith of God give proof that he has name and has a definable place in our world; the accounts and testimonies of all things related further solidify this claim..As stated in my argument, faith validates the notion of God because real people have had real experiences they have told concerning their relationship with God. My opponent will contend with the first paragraph of my summary, by pointing out that what is conceived doesn't have to be real. Therefore to prove God exists I must rationale the God has a "necessary existence" because of the qualities we understand him to have. I recall to my arguments using the definitive nature of God's qualities. God's power allows himself to be, God's knowledge accounts for all things known and unknown, and God's presence allows for all things to be. Since these characteristics of God have been defined, by necessity God must exist. We must have an account for something that encompasses all things which include that which we perceive around us, which by the definable properties of God; make him exist. Infinite must exist, because there has to be an account of a number so vast that it is endless. My opponent will no doubt, refute my argument by stating it is a circular rhetoric, using concepts of Infinite to define what is unreal and irrational, as a real existence. He will argue that God is just a definition, and based off my argument God can be substituted by x and x can be defined with similar properties. Furthermore he will say conception doesn't prove existence only that, it can be conceived. This is where my argument rests, God can logically exist because the properties of Infinite allow and account for things greater than itself, as still being of itself (Infinite Hotel Paradox). God exists as a definition because of his place in this world from a cultural standpoint and relevancy. God exists because he has allowed himself to exist through his word in the Bible. I can prove God exists, because existence wasn't defined in the parameters, as what kind of existence.