Yes Virginia, There Are Stupid Questions

Apologies, i thought this was more entertainment, but as you have put in effort, so shall I.At this stage, I would like to point out that within this argument, all i must do is make a solid defense to each example, something that can most definately explain each seperate scenario - so that there is a definite possibility that the question is not 'stupid' within at least one logically reached deduction. As neither has much information, the possibility that I may bismirch my opponents claims, will be the best I can do to prove my case(s).I noted during your last round you noted that stupidity must be injected into a question, and for stupidity to be an undeniable fact of life.I disagree, Stupidity is completely subjective in regards that a pile of trash an artist has put together would be considered stupid by some, and compeletly genious by others. You state that a subjective injection of stupidity from the asker must be done, for their question to be regarded as stupid - Again, that is where we differ - The word you dub as stupidity, I refer to as "ignorance" - an ignorant person may ask a seemingly obvious question to a person who has experience and understanding - but to the asker, it is a legitimate request to lift their ignorance. For 'stupidity' to be injected, the listener must be the 'injector' for it to be considered 'stupid'.1. For someone to be 'viably excused' as a sufferer of dyslexia, they must have troubles with spelling - stating that someone is only possibly dyslexic, simply because they didnt spell GPS incorrectly correctly, means nothing to the validability of my claim - their misunderstanding of the English language required justification - Perhaps they thought it spelt Geepieess - We have no idea what their phonetic understanding is, thus this is a concept that is irrefutable.Simple reasoning will show that no one can specifically verify the sanity of another human being without further understanding of said human. We are effectively at a logical impasse. I hope we can call this a positive tie to my side, as it is completely understandable as a defense, but not proveable within context. You may digress, however here is to hoping.2. I myself, was not given any geography or 'astrological' learning until year 10 onwards, when i was well into my teenage years.I had the benefit of books, and games to be my teacher in this regards, however our privilage of knowledge does not mean that we may disparage those who may or may not have experienced anything within this area. Disparaging ones' ignorance is a case of bullying, not a 'stupid' question.3.You agree the question is warped, I class this as accepted - The fact you state it is 'stupid' after is irrelevant.I myself often start conversation halfway through in my head, or when i speak - i am so eager to say what i thought, i miss words (so instead of asking "Whats the plan?" - it comes out as "The plan?") - neither has an understanding of the context so again, my possible explanation was even acceptable by your standards - though it is 'stupid warped' to you.The difference between meters and inches are only taught in countries that still use imperial measurments - Assuming that all humans are taught the difference between a world-wide accepted measurment standard (Metric), and then the measurement system that is retained by a handful of countries, (Impirical), is classic ignorance.4.Apologies, i miss read the context for that one.This is something that I will reference in the 5 quote as well, as both are tactics used by lawyers - hardly accounting to be a 'stupid' question - I would personally refer to them as morally corrupt, increadibly hurtful questions.There are quite a few lawyers who have stratagies that can be classed as "pitbull", "shark" and "bully" - these are the kind of lawyers you expect criminals to find, to simply 'get them out of prison' in movies - but usually they just use whatever tactic or loophole, weak spot or exploit to win their cases.There have been multiple documented cases where a lawyer has asked incredibly brutal and forthright questions to a witness or defendant with the intention of shocking that person - so they either lose credibility, or the convictions of the accusations are viewed in doubtful lights.Whilst i cannot find this case in particular (Little information, and little experience finding american court histories) - I have an example of some of the very hurtful and shocking questions a lawyer will ask to try and 'win' their cases. It is the recently reported Brock Turner Rape allegations.I was going to copy and paste the quotes I wanted - however the banner at the top of the site carries each section i wished to bring up.There is a banner at the top which contains each piercing question asked by the lawyer to try and discourage the victims version of the story - To try and weaken her standing so they can have a stronger foundation on their side.https://www.buzzfeed.com...If that is an unacceptable link - as it is buzz feed - I will locate a suitable link; However please message me via comments, and i will rectify the same.5. (Refer to 4.) I will refrain from further conclusions, and await my opponents response.