Kleptin, Logical-Master, and Yraelz are all the same person.

Alright let me begin my speech then. For starters I would like to point out that my opponent is wrong, there is absolutely no way that either of us can 100% prove that Kleptin, Logical-Master, and Yraelz are the same or different people. My opponent claims that this can be done by uploading 3 pictures but this is simply untrue as photo shop is readily available to me and would make this job easy in about 20 minutes. Thus instead of sticking my opponent with a burden of proof that he cannot prove I will simply be offering my voters better reasons than my opponent for why we probably cannot be the same people. 1. My opponent points out that we have all done our fair share of debates. This is true, I believe we have done 37, 38, and 56 at this point. Thus I am now going to go and copy every argument we have ever made and paste it into a word document............. and I'm back 1 hour 32 minutes later, slightly sleepier than when I left. Between myself, Kleptin, and Logical-Master we have typed 181,780 words, being 1,036,898 characters, and amounting to 365 pages of word document. Thus my first point is this, Wiki tells me the average speed of a computer user in words per minute for composition is 19, hence for it to be one person doing this it would take approximately 9567 minutes or 160 hours. However considering the fact that the typing speed was compiled presupposing that every word equals 5 characters we must evaluate this off the characters. Meaning 1,036,898 characters corresponds to 207,380 words. That many words corresponds to 10,915 minutes, or 181 hours. Which is roughly 7 and half days of straight typing. Which means considering logical-master joined Jan. 7 that out of the last 50 days we have spent 7 and a half straight days typing. This doesn't include the time it took us to brainstorm arguments, nor does this include the time it took us to eat, sleep, vote on other debates, or comment on other debates. So while it is plausible that we could have possibly spent 181 hours doing this, it is rather doubtful. 2. We have a combined 131 debates. There is no other one debater on this site to my knowledge with that many debates. The chances of us having that many as one person are unlikely. 3. My opponent goes into some minor detail on the idea that we could vote on each others debates thus bringing our win ratio up. I can easily debunk this idea. If I had more than one account, and I was using them to up my win ratio then I wouldn't bother with just two accounts. The consequence of having two account or 30 accounts are the same. If I am found out then I would be kicked off the cite. Thus I would make as many accounts as I could in order to assure that I win every debate. Obviously this is not the case as: Yraelz: 67.65% (and falling) Logical-Master: 62.86% Kleptin: 72.00% We have each lost quite a number of debates. If I was going to have multiple accounts to ensure victory I would be doing it well. 4. The only hard piece of evidence, besides evidence:1 we have at this point comes from the comment section of the debate titled, "Time is just a concept" http://www.debate.org... In which the debater known as sweatycrease makes this accusation: "HEY BRITTWALLER, YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT KLEPTIN AND LOGICAL MASTER ARE THE SAME PERSON, SO YOU HAVE LESS OF A CHANCE TO WIN THIS DEBATE WHEN HE VOTES SEVERAL TIMES FOR HIMSELF." The webmaster replies later with, "Hi Debaters, Please disregard any statements made by Sweatycreases regarding the account status of anyone on Debate.org. The comments regarding these matters are untrue and against the terms of service. I can assure you that this problem is being dealt with. Thank You, Webmaster" As the webmaster has every ability to check IP addresses he/she should be seen as the leading authority on deciding if we are the same people. 5. My opponent suggests I would open three different accounts so that I could debate myself and have an organized space to do debates. This is untrue as 3 different accounts would only be less organized and would require I log out to change between debates. As far as wanting to debate myself goes I would like to ask my voters to have 30 minutes conversation with themselves at this point and then ask themselves how much fun it was afterwards. Debating yourself, especially in multiple hours sessions would not be fun. 6. Finally my opponent suggests that because we all use a similar style of debate we probably are all the same person. This is untrue, and a fallacy known as ignoring the common cause. The fact that we all use similar strategies comes from the fact that we have all debated before. The fact that we all use similar strategies in now way shows us to be the same person. This would be like saying, "many pro wrestlers use similar strategies thus they must the same person." Your move.