Does freewill exist? (Pro) Libertarian Freewill is true, (Con) Hard determinism is true

In this final round i will present a final argument then a closing statement for why libertarian free will is true. Now before i begin to present my final argument i want to concede that my argument called "denying freewill requires freewill" only applies to some forms of determinism and not all forms of determinism. Thats because forms like soft-determinism have freewill in their philosophy so my argument doesn't apply to them. So now that ive made that clear to my readers and voters im now going to give my final argument. FINAL ARGUMENT FOR FREEWILL Throughout this debate me and my opponent have been discussing freewill and determinism and we have both given our case,rebuttals and counter-rebuttals now in (Con) counter-rebuttal he suggested that when i was speaking about agent causation that on a meta-physical level the agent can still be determined by meta-physical laws. Now i dont know if (Con) knows this or not but there is actually a form of determinism thats the same as hard-determinism except that it would also apply on a meta-physical level this is called "super-determinism" now super-determinism means that the world is super-deterministic that not only is the physical world deterministic but we the experimenters who imagine we can choose to do one experiment rather than another are also determined so this means that super-determinism means every decision you have ever made even tho they happen outside of physical reality are still somehow determined. However the fundamental problem with super-determinism is that it is impossible to verify or falsify it since we cannot get outside our experience to look and see if mental events were actually predetermined. Since this is the case then i cant prove super-determinism false and (con) cant prove it true. Now we can see which one is far more likely when we apply Occams razor to this something that i will now argue. Occams razor is a principle can be interpreted as stating Among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected what this means is that when two or more theories have the same evidence and predictions the one with the fewest unnecessary assumptions is logically true. 1. Agent causation is true and nothing outside physical reality is predetermining the agents choices so free will is true 2. Agent causation is true but the agents choices are predetermined by things that are outside physical reality so hard determinism is true. When we look at Libertarian freewill and Super-determinism (Metaphysical hard-determinism) then we can see which one makes the fewest unnecessary assumptions its libertarian freewill since super-determinism has to add in unnecessary assumptions in order for it to be valid. Libertarian freewill only assumes that the agent makes a choice that is not predetermined and thats not an unnecessary assumption since it doesn't have to add that metaphysical laws to predetermine the agents choice because in libertarian freewill the agent makes the choice without being predetermined. This means that super-determinism violates occams razor and that it would be impossible to verify or falsify super-determinism since we cant get outside our experience. So when we apply occams razor to these two theories about our choices we can understand that Libertarian freewill is most likely true. CLOSING STATEMENT One thing that i have not addressed in this debate is what i call the "External factors objection" my opponents third argument in his case for determinism makes this objection to freewill it says that since we we dont control external factors and that since we dont choose our circumstances then we have no free will. This argument for determinism is popular from Sam Harris and that in order to have free will we must have super powers and control every factor that is in our lives and our decision making processes. However this type of freedom no one holds to and its not how freewill works and it doesn't mean that we have control over all external factors. No madder how small our decision space has become our freewill would still be intact as long as we can retain the ability to be aware of all possible choices what im saying is that external factors and decision space is not the same as freewill. The concept of freewill is about our ability to be aware of a branching of possibilities that are ahead of us given what circumstance or external factors we find ourselves in. It can be broken down like this 1. Being aware of all possibilities 2. Take action and make choice according to your will Think of your life as a game of cards you may not control what hand you got but you chose the way you play it. Think of freewill as the cards you play with. You could be a prisoner locked up in a small cell tied up and deprived of all human rights. You would still have your freewill since you have the freedom to chose what you wanted to chose given your external factors and circumstances and your awareness of possible future timelines. The choices available to someone in prison and someone out of prison are different just like how the choices available to me are different than to you. We just find ourselves in different circumstances. but our circumstances dont diminish our freewill. Now if someone only has one option its because they are unaware of other possibilities but if you widen your decision space then you are actively using your freewill. And to a certain extent it is up to you how wide your decision space becomes. People can chose to widen there decision space and use their freewill or people can chose to narrow there decision space and make themselves into a puppet it will just all depend on what the (Self) wants. And it will ultimately be up to you weather you want to practice your free will or not so either way your still using your freewill. Just think about it and i hope you understand that external factors neither diminish nor improve our freewill so it cant be used as an argument against freewill. i hope that you enjoyed this debate and i hope that you all can come to a rational conclusion about all of this thanks for watching and have fun voting :) (1) https://en.wikipedia.org... (2) http://www.informationphilosopher.com... (3) http://www.booksandculture.com... (4) https://youtu.be...