Capitalism is Better than Socialism/Communism

"Capitalism is 'an economic and political system i" This system was supposed to include free enterprise . Even by putting a trade mark on something that deal was shot. What does political have to do with that system as far as I got the companies basically built themselves . We don't need to settle things with politics if we have economics , the political part of that went astray under the title of Capitalism and made trade agreements with other countries that are out of the citizens reach and not economical how can you trade with someone that has different priced land, different rules , even the frequently stated " underpaid workers' something we would not allow in our own country but then they allow companies to outsource to a cheaper location, If they don't play buy our rules then they aren't allowed business with us. Now I see where you said political but is CapitaLISM POLITICAL OR DID IT GET POLICIED , cAPITALISM ,sorry cap lock no intense intended , I just the freedom to gain and build as high as you chose but it was never intended to be outsourced where we would be competing against the rules that were set to govern us and we get chinese television set, also the way China conducts itself it is void of Capitalism what would make the same statute we have our system structured on work ok under a differently cratiked system . So like the bail out that is not capitalism that killed capitalism , the ones who were bailed out had competitors . This is why capitalism don't work. In socialism the prize is a government that provides for all the basics , then all the citizens can work on the next page , standardized state of the art healthcare in capitalism you got the HeaLTHCARE HAVING TWO OF THE SAME BRANCHES competing against one another instead of one of them serving the needs of the people , of all people cures you also got the creators being held back so that the distributor does not lose money when the creators get their jobs done right. So you got a bunch of companies doing the same thing and where is their incentive to fulfill our needs? They fill capitalisms needs , where in Socialism whenever an achievement is made its an achievement not just an initiative what capitalism responds to and you lose intuition that way. with all these 'dictators' with other names like monarchy their is only one method they would settle for and it was Capitalism a govern industry and a industry governed but in America the people where in charge that is another reason because capitalism is not run by the government or the people they are existing governments inside our government and now secretary controlled by foreign investors the government tried to make peace by trading goods which were almost like gifts but If socialism would of prevailed with the majority it has backing it they would of had some real gifts , damn cap locks, sorry' , Communism has allot of different forms so it don't qualify , so example China we consider communism but if it's a one man show then wheat is the difference between dictatorship , or is that the nice word we use for those who we traded to "'BUT BUT BUT " I like that ,lol , you missing that it is a theory and communism and socialism differ in the way Soc is communism controlled by the people and Com is soc controlled by the Gov so Com can be either capital or soc but social ism cant be capital or communism cause it has the people or maybe capitalism can not function under democracy , these people do not have a head they are running around on a broken failed system , if one government was to set up under the Social system it would have more leverage then the treat of war.:"Capitalism allows people to better themselves and their situation " it does not better its situation it takes more than it needs in greed to make sure it stays alive , always running from the floor falling out so it takes from everyone it can and keeps building higher running from a thing that will never catch it. But socialism doe's not run from anything or take anything it does not need and it will never crash cause it has a solid foundation and not a hastily built deception of a dream. If Socialism had existed as long as this Capitalism we all would be rich definitely no one in need of anything , so who is the lazy man the guy who sets off to accomplish a new task never that constructs itself as it builds cause it communicates and builds to the goal together. Or is the lazy man the one who works in a job that had not foundation but money so it's the government that makes us lazy but it is capitalism that holds us back and always has lower classes but socialism takes and levels everything so that people can come out on their own and while capitalism projects the vision of the future and free enterprise lends on the indication that the instructed who are actioned off to the capitalists the structure is lost the government fails to prepare the new generation another government prepares their generation so you got the corporations with the gasoline you got the government designing the car by what level the machine will be created and thousands of thousands serving themselves of the institution which this institution (school) is the sales man to the buyer but they don't work to put everyone into the next business their replacements are only a level taller then them that would keep the buyer from losing what the sell and the only thing ever evolving this is the entrepreneur they are the servants they are the teachers of the new class of students they are what you learn when you leave school when everyone is being taught the basics and the same when does the researched discoveries ever spill back into the assembly line of learning. See a flaw in capitalism where socialism is constantly learning as it is evolving at the same time capitalism just stands still . Social;ism is all kind of one of the same and since the technology is shared you don't have mass the researchers the initiative all secretly working on the same thing with socialism does not come any patents like capitalism has but by the time capitalism is done with a cycle socialism already has the new outcome that the buyer is coerced to invest in where they need to be certain socialism is just a whole damn new risk all the time with no part of it failing due to any mistakes in the line Social ism has everyone a servant to the researchers Capitalism increases one lever on one like 2 kids smacking cards on each other but the beloved socialism puts down a card and lets all the ones that sunk lower start to clime back up to the top incase the top sinks lower it's constantly reaching for the endless goal but their is a goal goals where if people knew they existed are what will come of them it will be like being born again . Like walking out of the oppression of slavery into a new land. I mean crap people complaining about living in those little houses that they put the japanese in government funded living quarters and maybe someone will disappointed and want more then the next guy or maybe no one will be disappointed cause it appoints people everyone goes through the ride of school and not all make it but the ones who don't they have what everyone has and the ones who get old they get what no one had they get their life and paid for by them that is guaranteed retirement for everyone that is not paid out of a funder that don't exist and their money is not taken from them and de valued and them old creeping into old and dying of the same thing that they worked for who the people before them worked for and were never given what they had paid for.So with the army to protect them the battle is abandoned what better way then to have someone not make war with you by selling them what they need . wile I heard el presidente did that sailing the army to a buyer that didn't exist and paying with money that will exist only as long as well it wont hold out forever So if the government has the biggest spending and the corporations possess the equity what cooperation is gonna pat for this endeavor because if the government had been for the people and not as a solo industry they would of had the corporations fight the war for them so the this air money is not taken from the large pockets so it must be inflated so that when it comes back to even the money that the corporation possessed is worth less then the money the government states that it has ans what buying power it has so the government has nothing to back it up but the corporations are in debt and have nothing to spend their money on any more it was spent on war the government can borrow from the companies but the companies have nothing to borrow from the government so I got it we'll set one of you against each other then we'll pick a side and sell you off the overrated overpriced criminally overpriced war machines that well howdy you get to extort the money from the companies any way so you build war machines for , us, by us, but you rip off the seller to it's ove buying. so finally your right government does have a role in capitalism this debt that no man on earth can make a sound decision about with everyone you have hired who is supposed to be able to accomplish that organization. that is what you get in the end unorganised government that throws their shoulders up every time they are asked for an answer and runs around to the end of the world in distress and distraught of what it will do . come over here f one of us fail we all fail everyone fails a little but this US has gotten ridiculous I think Obama went on a war shopping spree just to take his mind off it see if the government can eep itself like it has knowledge then it can sell knowledge while it pays for the knowledge but now it's under no obligation to do it's job in educating the future graduates it has more interest in the ones that it can buy and to educate them what does it ever have to lose it can not even tell you why it fails but it is still able