My Application Form is good enough to make me pass the test to join IDS.

I make links that can make download my 'voice message'. http://blog.daum.net... http://blog.daum.net... I accepted his grammatical correction and I edited my application form. Application Form Name: Gender:male Date of Birth: Major:history Grade:freshmen Mobile: [Questions] 1. Have you lived abroad? If YES, please specify where and for how long. No. 2. How is your English ability? High. 1st, I enjoy reading subtitles of 'Friends(USA soap opera)' at least 4 times faster than original playing speed of the videos. And I can practice fast-listening and turn down-listening(ex:Turn down the radio) by catching faster and faster to the unlimited speed, more and more quiet speech to the next to soundless condition. 2nd, I have debated in English debate sites. For example, I have debated in www.debate.org more than 10 times, and I have more than 60 posts in www.idebate.org. And I know many other English debate sites and English debate video sites. You said that your debate level is higher than online debaters in the reception room. So you told me you don't need to use online debate sites. But I tell you I have already met Ph.D Harish.K.Thakur in the www.idebate.org by competing in the Nuclear prohibiting debate. He is a political scientist and a poet. And I can tell you again www.debate.org is the best place for practicing for the World University Debate Championship because the people and the environment on the site is helpful to you. 3rd, I was a participant in World Civic Youth Forum 2009(http://www.wcyf2009.org.........). Although I was not a panel member, I could listen to the panel's speech and questions. And I met 2 Chinese friends in there and I was their tour guide in Korea for 3 days. They are university students majoring in international politics. I couldn't speak Chinese, so I guided them by using English. They even slept in my house for 2 nights. And they saw so many things in Seoul, Korea by following my guidance. I'll tell you in the reception room. Because of these reasons, I think my English skill is high although I didn't test TOEIC and TOEFL. TOEIC score (if available) : 3. Please write your plan and vision for IDS. (within 200 words) I studied very hard for myself to overcome strong opponents around the world, and I will contribute to this club to win 'World University Debating championship' by using my creative and sincere heart. I'll give you 3 examples. 1st, fast-reading : I can read the scripts in the 'Friends(USA soap opera)' 16 times faster than original speed. I carried 13 books from Seoul to Chungju to prepare seminar in 'the pupil of daybreak'(That is another debate club in Kyunghee University. But it is not a English debate club. Although IDS members don't need this explanation but online debaters need this.). 2nd, fast-listening. We can record and check practicing debate by using voice recorder and digital camera. And we can manipulate the play speed faster and faster to the unlimited playing speed. 3rd, fast-writing : By using a shorthand program, we can practice debate in many online debate sites like www.debate.org to improve ourselves more than our opponents. By using these measures, I am certain that we can listen to our opponents' arguments like slow motion and we can take the advantage in the debate contest. Because our speaking will express more content. Our speaking will show more passion. Finally, Our speaking will help us win. [The End] I quote the front part of my 'cross examination'. to emphasize my points. (1)Fast reading - Debate is the fight of logic and evidence, so the debater who can gather and use more information in the same time take advantage generally. This premise is available both speaking debate and writing debate. I already explain the consequences. 'By using these measures, I certain we can listen our opponents' arguments like slow motion and we can take the advantage in the debate contest. Because our speaking can contain more contents. Our speaking can show more passion. Finally, Our speaking can give us win.' (2)Fast listening - 'Fast listening' have the same effect like 'Fast reading'. I used this measure to prepare College Scholastic Ability Test in Korea(The test is similar to SAT in USA). I prepared English listening by using the sound. : Smaller and Smaller sound that are not listened even from the sound of careful footstep, 4 times faster than original playing speed. I had failed to good grade the 'College Scholastic Ability Test', but I feel the sound of 'English listening test' like a sweet music. It is like slow motion in boxing. And I got the highest score in The English Listening. (3)Fast-writing : I don't have to show an example of a debate held on debate.org that consists of vocal exchanges. Because, Vocal exchanges and Text exchanges are based on this condition. - 'If you want to speak, you should recall 'texts' in your brain. And if you can write something, you can tell same thing because you already have 'content' for expressing other people.' - I already wrote this sentence. hthttp://video.google.co.uk... And vocal exchanges in debate championships are also like presentation. Please click upper link and see the videos of World Schools Debate Championships. Refutation of his response : I don't have to emphasize my refutation related to (1), (3), (4), (6) because my 'cross-examination' by using 'member comments' was able to express my points. (2)I studied English by using debate by using the time when other applicants studied English for preparing tests. Toeic and Tofel requires only 1 answer. But many answers are existed for debate to win. Even if I assume they have higher English skills than mine, 'Machine for tests' will have more difficult time for following activities than who can think by himself. That means, if I assume 'The Situation', I guess they will consume more time to perform debate easily than I will consume some time to training English skills. (5)'There is no difference I found 'Speed reading and Speed listening' by using 'Friends' or 'Debate video'. It is important that I found the useful way to study English by using 'Friends'.' This is the main point of my refutation, but you just point out partial things. And Australian English have better traits for debate than USA English? If you cannot answer 'yes' and show me the proof, IT IS NOT THE MATTER OF 'LANGUAGE'. IT IS THE MATTER OF 'TRAINING' AND 'RESEARCH'. Dear members of www.debate.org. I suggest that you vote for me. I don't know who did you agree with before this debate. But I had better conduct in this debate so you can agree with me after this debate. Both of us express you our arguments clearly without many obstacles from grammatical error. But I used many reliable sources like 'Percentile', 'video of WUDC 2009 final', 'video of WSDC', '2009 World Rankings'. He just showed a reference site for Grammar, and he used a just partial thing, 'win ratio'. So, I claim I made more convincing arguments.