If the B-Theory of time is true, then Christianity is implausible

Equations are not necessary to determine plausibility or a basic probability. I do not need an equation to argue that the sun will probably come up tomorrow. Thus, this request from my opponent is nothing more than a desperate red-herring. Rebutting My Opponent's Objections(i) My opponent missed the mark with regards to my argument on Creatio Ex Nihilo, and has continued regurgitating as many straw-man arguments as possible. I never claimed that Genesis 1:1ff, Psalms 33:6, Psalms 148:5, John 1:3, Colossians 1:16, and Hebrews 11:3 contained a specific claim of Creatio Ex Nihilo. I simply argued exactly what is true; which is the fact that the majority of modern theologian scholars conclude that the totality of those passages in context strongly suggest this is the case. This is a valid Argument from Authority because it clearly meets the requirements of such. Therefore, Con has done absolutely nothing to undermine my argument in this regard. (ii) Con conceded my point here by dodging it while leaving behind a trail of more red-herrings. First, The Big Bang does not support a universe coming into being, it only supports the notion that their was a starting point. It's true, the red-shift of the galaxies and the Cosmic Microwave Background do not actually support a coming into being of the universe at all, but rather the existence of an initial point (acting like the two are synonymous or that one follows from the other is false). The Big Bang is just a point on a block and did not "happen" under B-Theory. All evidence of The Big Bang is completely compatible with B-Theory. I will repeat Dr. Craig's quote, because it is clear that Con does not even understand what B-Theory is:"On a B-Theory of time, the universe does not in fact come into being or become actual at the Big Bang..." - William Lane Craig The punchline is that I do not need to defend the notion that The Big Bang is compatible with B-Theory. This debate is under the assumption that B-Theory is true regardless of The Big Bang. If B-Theory is true then the universe did not come into being even if there exists a fixated Big Bang point on the block, and is not created because it is tenselessly eternal. If the universe is not created, there can be no creator. God is specifically defined as a creator in The Bible. Therefore, (ii) of my argument affirms the resolution. Any further argumentation from me Con should consider a favor. (iii) Con argues that just because there was never a time that any action you do was not done, does not mean that the action was not done freely. However, this is false. Free-will by definition is the ability to act without necessity. If all points in time exist statically on the block, then all "actions" are out of necessity due to being fixed. Thus, free-will would be false by default. Also Matthew 23:37 and II Peter 3:9: clearly suggest free-will. Appealing to Calvinism will due my opponent no good. (iv) Con says God is both timeless and personal. This is logically impossible. Either God is in time (and can personally relate to his creatures), or he is timeless. He cannot be both. "To be in time is to have a temporal location and a temporal extension. To be timeless is simply, to have no temporal location or extension. So these are contradictories; they cannot both be true." - William Lane Craig You would have to qualify the two, which is only possible under A-Theory; not B-Theory. (v) Con says both propositions would be true, however this is a logical contradiction. Evil never leaves existence. Thus, it cannot be overcome by definition. Thus, the claim it is "always" overcome is false by logical necessity.My argument is substantiated to the point where it pre-disarms any possible argument in favor of the notion that the probability of Christianity being true on a B-theory of time is inscrutable. The resolution has clearly been affirmed, but I hope Con's next round is fruitful. If the past is any indicator however, I will not hold my breath...