Humans would survive the typical ( slow zombie ) zombie apocalypse.

I think that this is a great topic, good luck to you. I will begin by rebutting your points, and form my argument. 1. The first 30 minutes of the apocalypse could easily be the last. Think about this, in third world countries people will not actually realize the danger of the zombies. There wouldn't be enough time to successfully get rid of the zombie problem, and if there is a virus it would probably not be eradicated, and there would be more "patient zeroes. " 2. Police response In most countries, normal police officers don't have guns. How do you expect fat officers with batons to successfully fend from a zombie invasion? They would need an army, and again there would probably be so many zombies by then that the invasion would be spread out. Again, human nature causes people to run away from danger rather then fight, and that would be a serious problem. 3. Military While I agree that militaries are quite good, modern guns don't have the damage to be able to kill zombies, and many militaries don't have soldiers with good training or equipment. And if there are forces that lock down and evacuate citizens, how do you know there won't be someone who doesn't have symptoms yet? Maybe they will get it while they sleep and slowly kill people and cause chaos. People don't just step aside for soldiers, they RUN and get in the way of soldiers. 4. CDC and WHO If the CDC/WHO was so effective, then why is ebola and H1N1 so bad? They are unreliable and normally corrupt agencies. 5. Outer space. The ISS wouldn't be used. Too much money and resources would go towards saving earth, rather then a couple of astronauts. Instead, research would have to be done in bunkers which would be incredibly risky. 6. Doomsday bunkers. This might be the survive part. But, then again what is your definition of survive? Do you think because a couple of rich heads of state survive, then humans as a whole survive? I think billions of people will die, and it won't at all be a victory. By the time the virus mutates it is very possible that people inside the bunkers could get infected, and when they need supplies they will go outside, and be greeted by millions of zombies. It won't work, and everyone will still die. 7. Nuclear Yea, humans will totally survive when hundreds of bombs are over their heads. This defeats the purpose of survival. 8. North Korea Hundreds of millions of zombies may enter from China, from the north. Unless the blast the bridges, they won't survive. Also, how do you know a missionary or a secret refugee from China doesn't come back in with the virus? Too many chances mate. 9. Islands Today's world sees hundreds of flights go to islands. This may be a destination for navies and stuff, but if just one person on each island has a virus then it is pointless. 10. Common knowledge. Governments control people. You can't have guns in most nations, which is why there isn't effective. democracy in those nations. People won't have good defensive resources. All your arguments are redundant. It is quite clear, that the pure stupidity of people and corruption of governments won't allow for humans to survive. How can you call it survival if 7 billion people die? Governments will crumble, nuclear war will ensue and I think that the radiation from nukes, the pure and utter chaos, and the lack of funds or people to even BEGIN to create vaccines will make the world stand still. There simply wouldn't be any life.