BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Spongebob is a stronger anime character than Thanos with 5 infinity gems + Goku ultra instinct

Spongebob's attributes according to canon lore: Has light manipulation, as he can create rainbows with his palms (and ride them) Absorption, he can absorb vast amount of water as well as physical blows. Limb regeneration: Can regenerate limbs quite easy within seconds. Bodily Regeneration. He has been cut to shreds only to regenerate himself. Hypersonic easily. He once crossed the distance between his house and the crusty crab within seconds. He also tagged supersonic plane once and got on it after it had already left off to pursue his bodyguard. Has incredible strength to the point where he can pull a cruise liner from his house to the crusy crab. Has a level of reality warping, as he can enter their dreams. His speed is increased vastly when he gets his super-hero outfit. The only reason he's not an olympian deity is because he wants to be with his friends. Items: (According to canon show lore) Magic Pencil that can warp reality depending on what you draw. 'Wumbo' belt can shrink opponents to the size of toys. Imagination Box can generate anything the user can imagine. Invisible spray that can make you invisible. Time-machine that can universe-bust, and then bring it back if desired. Plankton's Giant robot is a causal city-block buster. Exploding Pie Super pal suits that give you superpowers. Snail Plasm that can turn you into a snail if injected. Holy Sea Shell that can command anyone at will. And all of that (including his karate skills mentioned below) becomes irrelevant once you put him behind the wheel of a boat and tell him to get his license. It's SpongeBob's bloodlusted state, SB trying to get a boating license wrecks everything, anything and anyone. Mess with the spongebob, prepare to get spongebobbed come at me vro
Women have more benefits than men in spite of all that the feminists say.

It doesn't necessarily matter if passing a stone is more painful. Although it's not, You're comparing that to 9 months of pregnancy plus labor plus C - Sections. When's the last time somebody had to have major surgery to pass a kidney stone? Maybe 10% How often do woman get C sections. A lot more than 20% Also, When you pass your kidney stone, Do you have to raise it and send it to school afterward? Nope. You say woman "take it out" on their children? That's false. Also, That false fact about child abuse you gave is false. Menstruation is necessary, That's what makes it more beneficial for men. Women HAVE to menstruate. Men DO NOT. Try to keep up please. Your third point is just complaints about feminism. That is irrelevant to the argument. The only point here is if woman get more benefits or not. Facts don't care about anything, They don't have minds. You know that right? We all know that facts can't think Stop reminding us captain obvious. You're a rape denier. How original of you. Go rape a donkey please and spare me your rape spreading you enabling donkey rapist. I'll take the conduct point just to point out the indisputable fact about my donkey raping opponent. Oh then you say "don't accuse men of rape because then you'll get accused yourself" That's a really transparent way of calling yourself a rapist. I'm not scared of being accused, Why are you? Hide your donkeys people. More feminist stuff. . . """"". . Cool Story Straw manning rape. It doesn't matter what the feminists say is Rape. It matters what the law says is rape. Stop using remarks from feminists. The fact is woman get raped more and that's a perk for men cause they get raped less. You're not a mind reader, Why would you say I wouldn't believe a man if he said he got raped. I would probably believe him about as often as I would a woman. Which is *Says Number* Woman cannot just accuse a man and send him to jail. It's the opposite. Woman could accuse a man who actually did it and he wouldn't go to jail. soooooo You're wrong. I don't have to be a mind reader to know that woman don't want to swallow jizz. It's called empathy. Do you want to swallow jizz? I don't! You don't! Oalks don't! Your girlfriend don't (get over it. ) My wife don't (I'm over it) It's a fact. Even god said so. GOOOODDD Your floor.
Women have more benefits than men in spite of all that the feminists say.

Well you certainly made this easy. I'll give you more than one reason. 1. Childbirth. 2. Menstruation. 3. Physical abuse. 4. Rape. 5. Rape. 6. Rape. 7. Oral sex is way more annoying for them. 8. Men just have to lick it. 9. Woman get "snot" shot into their mouth and have to pretend it's hot. 10. Rape.
Women have more benefits than men in spite of all that the feminists say.

Yeah, You have proven your argument by showing the intellectual capacity and maturity of a two-year old. I tell you not to scream abuses and the first thing you do is get triggered like a two-year old. Wow, I am wondering what your relation with jizz is. You sure seem to like it, Since you have absolutely no argument except that. No, I wouldn't want to be raped. I don't want to become just another number on the Justice Department report which shows more men than women are raped each year, While leftist channels like CNN continue to brainwash two-year olds like you to their narrative. How about portraying men as heroes in movies? How about portraying men as brave, Courageous and always available to help women, Even sacrificing their own lives for women? How about having such expectations from men? How about laughing at men when they report domestic violence against women, Who incidentally perpetuate 70% of non-reciprocated domestic violence, Like I PROVED above with SOURCES, Which you have failed to do so far? As I promised, I will provide some additional privileges that women get along with those that I mentioned in my third argument: Compared to what could happen to a man who is falsely accused of rape, Women who are caught making false accusations can get away without any repercussions. Boys in schools are treated like "defective girls" and their behavior is pathologised. 1 in 7 American boys is diagnosed with ADHD, Most of them falsely. (US Department of Health) Women get more lenient sentences than men for EQUIVALENT crimes. (Study by University of Michigan Law School) Standards are lowered for the sake of gender quotas, Even for jobs that demand certain capabilities which are needed for saving lives. (FDNY) Women get sympathy. Men are told to "take it like a man. " The employment rate for men has been going down since 1956 and is being replaced by women, Mostly through gender quotas. (Surprise, Surprise, This was actually a study by CNN. ) Even though it's illegal, Doctors often lie to men about requiring spousal consent before getting a vasectomy. Attempts to address men's issues are often met with outright hostility, Especially from feminists. (Scrapping International Men's Day. ) When men sit on the subway with their legs wide open, They are accused of "manspreading", But nobody says anything when women occupy several seats by putting their grocery bags on them. The majority of the benefits I listed are in Argument 3. I believe in posting facts and evidence, Unlike my opponent who has a rare intelligence. It's rare when he shows any. Come on, Post at least one source. Pretty please? One fact? One tiny piece of evidence? A single bit of information? Come on, Surprise me by saying something intelligent.
Women have more benefits than men in spite of all that the feminists say.

I was simply placing a staple fact to add to the debate. I've already proven my argument. Fine, Here's some questions to pass the time. Would you want to swallow Jizz? How about being raped? How about having a skirt stuck on you and being told you have to look like human candy or you're worthless. I would like to point out that my opponent might be a donkey rapist. But he's not a bigot. He will Rape ANY cattle. Equality. Your floor.
Women have more benefits than men in spite of all that the feminists say.

Look, These abuses doesn't help anybody. You're not changing anybody's mind. All you are proving is that light travels faster than sound. Some people like you appear bright until we hear them speak. It's OK if you disagree with me. I can't force you to be right. For the last round, I will give some additional privileges that women get. I would appreciate it if you too did something like that.
islam vs any thing

Even if the burden of proof is shared, absolutely nothing has been proved in this debate. Islam has not been proved to be the true religion, and Islam has not been proven to not be the true religion. Absoutely nothing has been proved from this debate. Despite Pro's assertions, he's proved as much as I have.As for Voting on this debate, the 'Made more convincing arguments' is a tie, spelling and grammar inevitably goes to me, conduct goes to me because Pro has just made lots of assertions. More reliable sources is a tie because even though pro used sources, they all failed to prove that Islam is the true and final religion.
islam vs any thing

yes indeed. there is some problem with this website or my keyboard..............some time I write word that do not got written. well I am not debating about good English and bad English. and proving it to be good or bad. indeed I haven't put any logic and concept about any aspect of life................as my opponent don't ask and he even has nothing to say but my English is butchered. which seems his defeat. indeed its not every person ability to understand every thing as your knowledge is limited. indeed I wish there could some other opponent that this debate would be interesting. next time brother don't choose to debate with me. I will come with far more difficult topics. and those will go above from your head loll....................sorry no offense but I am feeling it this way loll. its final round and you haven't proved Islam is not true religion. and peoples because of not good participation from you haven't known to what is Islam which I would be telling than. well better like next time... hope some one worthy let people decide .......................................................................///////////////////////////............................................. its not big deal there is spell checker and i can check spelling..................and some time the words go missing and its because of some problem with web page or keyboard i think with webpage . because it do not happen on other places
islam vs any thing

There's absolutely nothing for me to respond to because you've repeatedly failed to meet your burden of proof. I've inevitably got the vote for spelling and grammar, considering your appalling spelling and grammar and your unhealthy obsession with elipsises. I'm sorry, but Pro has only asserted that he's given proof that Islam is the 'true and final' religion. From what I can comprehend, Pro has suggested that you need to have faith and that faith is the evidence that Islam is the true and final religion, but I could have faith in anything. I could convince myself that anything is true, but that doesn't make it true. I could say 'you just need to have faith!', but that doesn't make whatever rubbish that comes out of my mouth true. I apologise if I'm strawmanning your 'arguments', I just have trouble understanding very butchered English.
islam vs any thing

lol....... i have never seen links to some of the debates..............if external link is prove than what kind of proof it is. yes indeed i will provide the Quranic verses and hadith (the saying of prophet Muhammad Saww).. indeed you haven't any proof that its not true religion. you are denying than proving. only denial is not proof. in this round i will give references to Qur'an and hadith. 1) http://en.wikipedia.org... http://physics.hallym.ac.kr... http://www.adherents.com... 2) https://en.wikibooks.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.crf-usa.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... 3) http://www.al-islam.org... http://www.angelfire.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.al-islam.org... the links will not stop.........see the evidence. i said there are only 5 rounds if it would be 10000 round even than my explanation with logic and evidence will not stop. the language English is my you can say 4th language but its not the part of the game if it is i don't care logic is logic its up to you accept it or not. and its m debate within few months i would be familiar with all the features of this website which i found so much interesting. indeed at least i can share my knowledge with peoples and learn from them 2.................great place with great peoples................................
islam vs any thing

Pro has failed to provide evidence that would back up the assertion that Islam is the one true religion. I'll rebut his three points.1)There's no evidence here, although I can only stand tiny parts of what he's saying due to extremely poor spelling and grammar.2) Granted, but there's no evidence here that suggests that Islam is the one true religion.3)Islam may provide morals, but that doesn't prove that it is the one true religion.
islam vs any thing

ok lets begin........just see one thing. see the fact. is covers all aspects to become a true religion. 1) Islam would not be a true religion if it would be denying all other other prophets from the beginning eg.....ADAM (AS means peace be upon him) up-to the last and final messenger..............we fulfill that ( which means we follow what is preached and told by the all prophets). so one could not argue where were we before prophet Muhammad (saww stand for peace be upon him ). its the last part of rope and whole rope is knot at this place. imagine it. 2) the campaign of this religion was started by one person what he said that heppend............like his relegion would spread to whole world. and it is in the whole world............that fact could be realized from the famous book (the 100) he was on the top among the list. the author was christian but he said he cannot deny the fact he was the most influential person of the whole history of mankind. 3) Islam is perfect....................i will give few examples of what it has given to us. best instruction and best rules regarding every aspect of life i) social life ii) economical life ii) domestic life iv) natural aspects of life v) warfare aspect of life v) afterlife vii) marriage life viii scientific aspect of life viii every aspect of life the thing we even cant understand because of lack of knowledge etc.........etc................etc........................etc let me elaborate it. i will not discuss all in sequence but by interlating and integratring it Islam says learn from the PULP of mother till the grave also whatever come in front of you every thing is made by ALLAH so when you are studying it means you are studying about ALLAH. that why our list is so long and covers all area of the human life and all other lives eg the life of whole universe Islam teaches us how to eat..........................how to sleep............................who to pray...................you to ease your self..................how to talk.......................how to walk............how to earn..............how to have sex with wife. how to travel..................how to behave with parents .............neighbors............children...............elders.........women..................animals..................poor................rich..............rulers...................business partner....................teacher...............non believers.................. put any thing you will find the instruction given by our prophet............ also give instruction ( the individuals and groups and the whole nation.) tell you now a days science tell the instruction given by Islam are best for many purpose..............i mean all those which relate to some physical exercise and some physiological behavior. this was almost about social life and some about economical life
Russia could start a Soviet revival

First of all I just want to let everyone know that if I come of as an anti-Russian and/or offensive I am sorry and I will try to be more sensitive but this is in it's self a sensitive topic. Ok so to clarify I will argue that Russia might be preparing or starting a Soviet revival. My opponent will try to argue against me by disproving me if possible and providing a counterclaim. My first claim is about Ukraine. I'll start with a place called Crimea I'm sure you've heard about it in the news. Russia is strengthening their bases in Crimea (1). Now I'm sure some of you are wondering why Crimea is so important. If you'll be so kind to open up the link I posted under source number 2 it's a map of Ukraine and it will help me explain (2). Okay so if you opened up the link it's a map of Ukraine with Crimea highlighted, there's a few names in the circle and one is Sevastopol. Sevastopol has the nearest port to Russia in Europe that doesn't freeze year round. For Russia acquiring this port is the naval passage through Europe. My second claim is also about Ukraine but I'm not going as in depth as my first claim. Russia not just Tuesday sent more troops into Ukraine (3). If Russia is not at war or has no reason to have more troops in Russia then why bulk up. I'll leave more for later but first I want to see my opponents counterclaim and or rebuttal. (1)http://news.yahoo.com... (2)http://media2.s-nbcnews.com... (3)http://www.msn.com...
There are 366 days in a year (rounded to the nearest whole number).

When I sited source 3, I meant to say Sidereal day (in addition to stellar day) also equals 23 hours 56 minutes 4 seconds, as what my source says. Sorry for the mistake. Following from there, there are 366 sidereal days in a year, so there are also 366 stellar days in a year, which is the same number of days in a year, as of how I defined the word day, as explained in my first post. Since my opponent has not made an argument, I have nothing else to say.
There are 366 days in a year (rounded to the nearest whole number).

It takes 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4 seconds for the Earth to rotate 360 degrees around its axis, measured relative to the stars (a stellar day) [1]. The 24 hour day most people are familiar with is measured by the time for the Earth to rotate 360 degrees around its axis, measured relative to the sun (a solar day) [2]. The sun moves very little in relation to the stars, so a stellar day is an accurate measurement of a full rotation of Earth on its axis. A stellar day is also equal to 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4 seconds (rounded to the nearest second) [3]. There are 366.242199 sidereal days in a year [4], the same as the number of stellar days in a year. 366.242199 rounded to the nearest whole number is 366. So there are 366 days in a year rounded to the nearest whole number. [1] . http://en.wiktionary.org... [2] . http://en.wiktionary.org... [3] . http://astronomy.swin.edu.au... [4] . http://www.google.com...
There are 366 days in a year (rounded to the nearest whole number).

The earth is revolving around the sun in 365.256 days. Your 366 day are not even rounded to the nearest whole number, if you want to round the number, it's 365 days. of course, the earth revolving around the sun doesn't have any relation to the time the earth takes to turn around its axis once. But it does have some relation because of our seasons. This means that every four years, the earth is one day ahead, so we add another day ( 0.256*4=1.024-1 day=0.024 days). But this still leaves us with 0,024 days per 4 years. So, every hundred years, we leave the leap year out. Except when it is divisible by four. This leaves us with 0.0001% accuracy. I think that means mission accomplished, right?
Libertarianism is a flawed philosophy.

First off you are flawed in your argument. You claim that all libertarians want as little government intervention as possible; however that is simply not the case. The fact of the matter remains that libertarians use the government as a tool to help society regulate itself. What you advocate as the successful way to run a society is that of a "Big Brother" mentality. Well I hate to tell you this, but it is the guidance of the government and not complete regulation that allows for a democratic way of life. Also I think you may have over looked the fact that the United States does not in fact have a free market system but rather a mixed economy. This is a common misconception. Yes we do have government intervention, but some people would argue that because we elect members into government we have control of putting those in office who will best represent our beliefs. However this does not cover the fact that there is government intervention. So when you argue libertarians allow for a free market system that is false, because they use a mixed economy to help guide America along a path of success. Furthermore you rant about the fact that libertarians leave the poor to fend for themselves. Well if I remember correctly it is thanks to programs created by liberals such as social security and WELFARE that help support those in need. Let me break it down for you; a conservative attitude favors limits on government activities and promotes a private ownership. Conservative leaders allow the market place to operate freely as possible Now a liberal position FAVORS more government involvement in business. Liberal governments tend to impose stronger quality and safety regulations than do conservative governments. While taking an active role in helping society stabilize. Now that we have defined the concept of what the libertarians stand for I await your justification for your hasty statement.
Libertarianism is a flawed philosophy.

If I'm not mistaken, libertarians want as little government as possible, the lowest taxes possible, and the most individual rights possible. Libertarians trust the free market to get things done. Here's why that's a terrible idea: We cannot trust the free market to run the show. The free market inevitably leaves some people behind. Social Darwinism applies here: Survival of the Fittest. Competition inevitably means someone will be the loser. Libertarians say it is not right to take money away from those who are more successful, but is it right to leave the poor, the less fortunate, those who have missed opportunities in the cold? Is it right to leave the unluckiest in the cold? The free market will never have an impetus to help the poor, because it is not in the interests of business. Also, if I'm not mistaken, the last time libertarians had control of the government was during the 20s, and that didn't turn out so well. You know, the whole Great Depression and all. Oops. We need government, as much as Ron Paul hotheads might disagree. We need the FDA. It keeps our food safe to eat. We need the EPA. It keeps our environment nice, clean, and liveable. We need the IRS. It sort of manages our government and keeps it running. We need the FCC. It stops pornography and offensive content from getting on a television that a child could turn on. Yes, reform of these institutions is needed, but we should not get rid of them. Society cannot moderate itself. I have more arguments, but I will let my eventual opponent try to debunk my arguments before bringing more to the table.