The Existence of God is Impossible

IntroductionI would like to begin by thanking my opponent for assuming this debate. I look forward to this debate and I hope it to be a productive contention. ArgumentsI will now compile a list of the points I plan on going over throughout the course of this round. 1. The idea of a being of necessary existence being needed to create something that could just as likely be of a necessary existence is a backwards and paradoxical assertion.2. There is an unsettling lack of substantiation towards the existence of God.3. A conscious and thinking being cannot exist without quantum consciousness. First, I shall begin by justifying my first point, which was the following: “The idea of a being of necessary existence being needed to create something that could just as likely be of a necessary existence is a backwards and paradoxical assertion.”If God were to exist, He would be of a necessary existence, meaning he is “uncreated” and did not have a cause. He is, essentially, a being that exists and came into existence without external phenomena. Furthering my description, this god supposedly created the universe. Therefore, the universe is of a contingent existence, which means it required something external for it to be created.This particular point is not necessarily to disprove God, but to point out a paradoxical issue with the arguments towards God.To point this out, I will start by saying that Christians believe God was needed in order for the universe to come into existence. However, if told that God would also need a creator, they fail to believe it. The Christian fails to realize the following question: If the universe needs a creator, why doesn’t God? And if God doesn’t need a creator, then why does the universe? I would like to hear my opponent’s response to this question, as it is crucial to be able to effectively prove my point. I will now move on to my second point, which says the following: “There is an unsettling lack of substantiation towards the existence of God.” My opponent must admit that this is true. This is where faith comes in, I suppose. My opponent, if he is like other Christian debaters, is most certainly going to - or was planning on it before I said this - make a statement about faith and say something like “Just have faith.” This is what I am usually told. Unfortunately, faith means nothing to me. For me, I require scientific evidence. Someone who denies scientific evidence and facts denies reality. If there truly were a god, why is there no evidence? Why has this supreme being not left any evidence to support his existence. The world’s Atheist population is slowly increasing, and by 2038 the United States will be over 50% Atheist. If there truly were a God that, as the Bible and other religious texts prove, wishes to be known of and worshiped, then why is there still no evidence? I believe the answer to this is simple: There is no god. Not only is there science against God, but there is no science towards God. I will now continue on to my third and final point, “A conscious and thinking being cannot exist without quantum consciousness.” To prove this, I will need to do a lot of explaining.In the early 20th century, it was realized that “it is fairly plausible that conscious free decisions (“free will”) are problematic in a perfectly deterministic world, so quantum randomness might indeed open up novel possibilities for free will[1].” As the only way for random behavior to exist is through the quantum theory, it is obvious that a conscious, thinking being with free will would have to have quantum-bound consciousness.Some of the early pioneers or quantum physics such as Plank, Bohr, Schrödinger, and Pauli often emphasized the various roles of quantum theory in the conflict between physical determinism and free will. Free will is erratic and essentially unpredictable. The only way for free will - the power of making free choices that are unconstrained by external circumstances or by an agency such as fate or divine will - to exist is for it to function in a quantum state, as there is no randomness in the physical, macro world.Therefore, as the basics of this science have been explained, I will now present my explanation on how this relates to God. God is defined as an omniscient, omnipotent, infinitely great being with free will and the ability to work as he wishes. The key word there is free will. If God exists outside of spacetime, which would be the only way for a being such as God to create and control the universe, there would be no quantum physics and theory for His free will to operate. Therefore, as facts do not lie, it is impossible for God to have free will. Conclusion In conclusion for my main arguments, I have proven and thoroughly backed up all of my claims. I believe I have sufficiently made my arguments clear.I look forward to my opponent's arguments and speculate about whether he can manage to prove me wrong. I patiently await his arguments. Sources 1. plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-consciousness/2. rationalwiki.org/wiki/Quantum_consciousness3. quantumbrain.org4. thefreedictionary.com/free%20will