Trump is not fit to serve, due to his volatile, immature and dangerous personality

My opponent has resolved that Donald Trump is not fit to serve due to being "racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islam-phobic, volatile, isolationist, irrational, rude, immature, a liar, a climate change denier, selfish, and egotistical." I will debate these points, the true and the untrue, and explain why I believe that Trump is fit to serve. Firstly, I concede that Trump is racist and sexist - however, he is certainly not the first POTUS to be either of these things. Ultimately, seeing as neither of these stances have impacted his policymaking, and considering the nature of the stances in the first place, I would hardly deem him unfit for the office of POTUS because his views on race and sex may differ from yours and mine. Keep in mind that he was voted into office with these things in mind. I disagree with your argument that he is xenophobic. He has attacked illegal immigration, but not legal immigration, showing no inherent prejudice against people from other countries. Furthermore, he has outwardly supported the Iranian people in their protests against their current government, as well as having been quite amiable to U.S. allies such as Canada and Israel. Xenophobia is a sweeping term that simply does not apply to his stance on foreign nations. I invite you, both Pro and Instigator, to provide evidence of Donald Trump's supposed homophobia. I concede that Trump is Islam-phobic, but I question why Pro believes opposition to Islam, a religion known for oppression of women and homophobia in its traditionalist form widely practiced in the Middle East, makes Trump unfit for the office of POTUS. I was under the impression that sexism and homophobia were negative things that should be opposed. I disagree that Trump is volatile. He has shown no rapid changing of mood and/or attitude toward anything and has, on the contrary, stood rather steadfast in his beliefs, regardless of how right or wrong they may be. I agree that Trump is isolationist, and question why this rational political stance of defensive, non-interventionism would make him, or any POTUS, unfit for office. I disagree that he is irrational. On the contrary, he has been considerably rational, especially in his dealings with North Korea (making considerable effort to maintain peace without giving the North Korean regime much ground against us), as well as in his policy making. Although some of his policies are foolish, that does not necessarily equate to irrationality and impulsiveness - there is an effort to reason, the outcome is simply incorrect. Again, this does not make him unfit for office. The claim that he lies being used as a reason for why he is unfit for office is an interesting one. Almost all, if not all, presidents in U.S. history have lied on a regular basis. It's essentially a job requirement, especially in times of heightened hostility with foreign powers. Why would this make Trump in particular unfit for office? I disagree that he denies climate change. His statements regarding it from 2016 onward (ie: the only statements that are still somewhat relevant and up-to-date) indicate that he simply does not think much of climate change, rather than deny it. I fail to see why his disagreement with some peoples' opinions on the significance of climate change, especially when he holds a relatively short-term office, makes him even remotely unfit for office. I disagree that he is selfish and invite Pro to provide evidence as to how he may be truly, personally, selfish. Placing the U.S. before other countries in his dealings does not count as personal selfishness. I concede that Trump is somewhat egotistical, and again, question why this would make him unfit for office, especially as it has demonstrably little impact on his policy making. I would like to remind both Pro and voters that elected presidents are not unfit for office simply for disagreeing with our personal beliefs.