JK Rowling's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was plagiarized from Willy the Wizard

You also argue that Peter Jackson, JJ Abrams, current Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Newt Gingrich, professors of College and doctors are backing up your statements. The truth that Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich are full lies, so who knows they are speaking the truth. " The fact is that you don't have proof that Nancy Pelosi AND Newt Gingrich are lying in this case and many professors of college and PhDs are backing up Pelosi and Gingrich's statements, according to my first round You Tube videos. You wrote, "I still say that having 44 similarities cannot be a coincidence. You wrote that between "Alice in Wonderland" and "Spirited Away" have a lot of similarities, well Hayao Miyazaki got permission from Alice and Wonderland and Rowling didn't. The way to tell is that Spirited Away is not being sued, and Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" is being sued. " I still say that 44 similarities ideas can be a coincidence because it happens many times. Such as similarities between "Alice in Wonderland" and "Spirited Away", "Pokemon" and "Digimon" (1)(2), "Star Wars" and "Gundam" series have a lot of similarities (3) and their many more examples. The truth is that neither of them sued each other because they are all have ides and concepts, well ideas and concepts are not protected by copyright laws (4). You wrote, "Well a judge rule that the case will not be dismissed and this proves that Paul Allen and Willy the Wizard's lawyers are smarter than Rowling's and Harry Potter lawyers. Justice David Kitchen says that Jacobs' estate Paul Allen had a chance of success and this is looking can go Allen's way. " Well the judge has not ruled or declared Paul Allen as the winner yet and the judge said that his case is "improbable" (5). The lawyer, Nick Kounoupias said that "If the claim does proceed, then JK Rowling and Bloomsbury will be required to explain how the similarities between the two works came about, when to date there has been a refusal to disclose key manuscripts and notebooks. " (5). My answer to him is that both authors used the common uses of literature and other fiction, just like any author or fictionist would use (6). Wizard is very common to the literature world (7). Boy as the protagonist are common to the fiction world too (8). Authors of tournaments for their books can are easy and very common to the fiction and real life world (9). One of Allen's claims that similarities that "both protagonist had help" (10), well protagonist normally have companions to help him on the hero's quest (11), said so on my first round You Tube vides. This is the writing industry, companionship is one of the most common uses in literature and Paul Gregory Allen who suppose to have knowledge in the writing industry forgot or don't realized that companionship is one the most common uses in literature and other fiction. In other words, Paul Allen and his lawyers know zip about literature and the common uses in fiction so Allen wouldn't know what could have been plagiarizes and what were from the common uses in literature for the Goblet of Fire. Monsters are also common in literature (12). Another piece that Paul Allen does not realize. I just don't get how you can miss something simple, as monsters, boy heroes, wizards and companionship are the common uses in literature and other fiction, it just makes no sense. My last statements is that Rowling could have uses the aspects of the common uses of literature and fiction for the Goblet of Fire and not from Willy the Wizard. (1). http://www.escapistmagazine.com... (2). http://boardreader.com... (3). http://www.animefringe.com... (4). http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com... (5). http://www.nzherald.co.nz... (6). http://tvtropes.org... (7). http://www.amazon.com... (8). http://tvtropes.org... (9). http://tvtropes.org... (10). http://www.scribd.com... (11). http://tvtropes.org... (12). http://classiclit.about.com...