My Opponent Will Not Mention Cats in this Debate

Yep... soon…soon this will be over. Thank the lord… Before I properly begin. As much as I enjoyed the video posted by you in R4, I have to ask you the relevance of the video to the debate. Moving on- “Even if you want to, that doesn't mean you won't. Your will can go against yourself. You can be forced to do things you don't want to do. “ I’m not going to try combat this like what I have done in previous rounds. Instead I shall only say- Let’s just wait and see what happens at the end of my R5 argument; that is what will ultimately decide whether or not your arguments have been successful i.e. whether or not I have mentioned the word that I said I wouldn’t mention. Predictions argument: Let’s just clear one thing This a meme. This is a gif I understand that there may not be a big difference in these two image types (especially the fact that they are both “you cheated, pirate”), but there is still nevertheless a difference. Your supposed prediction was somewhat accurate but not completely accurate. It also makes me question your supposed master prediction skills which you clearly made it to be through these -> “You see, I am God. Or at least, I have the epic power of true prediction.”…“I am the master of prediction.” From this, I could conclude therefore that your prediction of my fate may not be as accurate as you first made it out to be. But like I said in the previous argument, we’ll just have to wait and see what happens in my last round argument (as I have previously explained why) Assassin Argument: I am not an assassin regardless of what you say. I don’t care about “young felines” because they have no emotional appeal towards me. How exactly does not caring about these animals make me an assassin? You say that there is “obviously some malicious force at work” but you make no backing up for what you have said… you then also draw a mysterious conclusion from what you said last that I “obviously” must be teaming up with feline assassins… One question. What on earth has your assassin argument got to do with me “supposedly” ending up mentioning the word which I said I wouldn’t mention? “You see, he is obviously falling and failing. While once being logical and perfectly int4ct he fell for my traps, resorted to nitty-gritty differences, and even synonymous wording. There are still two more rounds. Att4ck after att4ck, he will eventually have no choice, but to speak "***", one way or another.” Well, we’ll just have to wait and see. To conclude this round: Spaceking has not fulfilled the BOP. In order to have fulfilled the BOP, I have to have broken the rules and contradicted the preposition and resolution. Because all of his arguments conclude somehow that I will contradict the resolution, they will only be valid if I do contradict the resolution. If I have sustained the resolution, then all his arguments will be invalid, nullified etc etc because all of them end with the “conclusions” that I will contradict the resolution and preposition. Therefore, we can conclude -> That Spaceking’s arguments are all currently invalid and null (I intend to keep it this way ^.^) because I have sustained the preposition and resolution. Therefore, my opponent has not upheld the BOP. Moving on… FYI, I survived this round. : )