God most likely does NOT exist

Hello again, hope your having a good day. But let's begin! Your first point was that my point was irrelevant. But you dropped two of my points so i don't know which one. However they were all relevant. 1) I am responding to your 1 and 2 point. "Albert Einstein proved big bang theory and thus no God." Wrong, the big bang theory only states that at the beginning, in a flash of light and energy, everything came into existence. Now first we have to clear up my point. My point was that not necessarily that the big bang theory is wrong, merely that it demonstrated a beginning. If there was a beginning, what cause this universe to come from nothing and what cause the explosion? There has to be a God. 0=0 the only way for the universe to exist is if God created it. your next point was that perhaps the universe was already there? No! the big bang theory explained that there was nothing. But even if the universe was there how did we get the precision and accuracy in the universe we have? You also said, if God exists, where did He come from. And as i refuted in my last speech, you have contradicted yourself, God by definition is eternal. To say He had to be created is to make Him less than God. This point was dropped. 2) my second point you again dropped. Even if the universe did come from nothing and exploded. how did we get the extreme precision we have today? Only answer is God. You dropped this again. 3) My third point was that no God= no reason. Thus you can never refute God. Again dropped. 4) my fourth point was that science changes and you are on shifting ground. Science can never prove something. also dropped... Your next point was basically saying that i have the burden of proof. And that you must either concede or continuously refute my arguments. I have three responses. 1) the burden of proof is shared. Both of us have made claims. God either exists or doesn't. We both have a responsibility to prove. You see, if you just refute my arguments then we are back at square 1. does God exist or doesn't He? Lack of evidence and logic on my side does not mean no God. Merely i haven't proved He exists. He might? But you still have your burden of proof to show He doesn't. 2) You have dropped most of my argument. I don't wish to sound arrogant or rude, but as you yourself said, point 2 and 3 have been dropped. also you dropped my 2, 3, and 4, point under argument 1 about the universe. So even if the burden of proof was completely on me, you have fulfilled your role. 3) You have brought 2 of these arguments from philosophers. And i have refuted them. Free will, and God's goodness for example. As i see, you have as now, dropped them. Argument 4 Your definition. "the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint" this definition is completely wrong. If freedom meant the will to act without restraint, then freedom wouldn't mean freedom, rather anarchy. If there were absolutely no restrictions on freedom, then freedom wouldn't be freedom. Freedom in it's purest form has to include limitations. Your next point was that our choice to not lose our right is our basis for freedoms. However you dropped my point. Where did we get those rights from? Only God. If man granted them then it would be relative. God is the granter of those rights. Without Him no basis for freedom. You concluded that you dropped my argument 2 and 3. However you have dropped one of the most essential proofs of God. What is the first thing we know about laws, there has to be a law Giver. Namely God. Thus you have concede that there is logical evidence for God's existence. My opponent, God exists, you have conceded to many of my points, will you base your eternity in the shifting realm of science? If i am wrong, i have nothing to lose. God is a God of love and excepts anyone, it is your choice to accept Him or refuse Him, but He is just and in judgement day, can not be unjust. The only way for Him to be just and loving is if you accept Him. Not acknowledged Him, but accept. You may think i am crazy and am trying to cheat and win by trying to talk you out of it. But i am not. Please at least accept the fact He may exist by fact and logic. From there it is for you to determine what to do with that knowledge. I look forward to your responses.