Border fence

My opp. is using a format for this round and if I am correct it is defending our own arguments. The con tries to cancel every single one of my arguments, but the negative fails to understand the purpose of my arguments. I will present my case for the third time... 1C: Border Fences provide security The reason why the United States provides Border Fences is not to segregate the civilians. The reason being is because segregate is defined by Merriam Webster as (to cause or force the separation of from the rest of society) Again border fences provide a sense of security to the society of the United States and the other countries that have border fences. The America people don't put border fences to Hurt People or to even "might make the Mexicans mad". The reason why the government provides border fences is because they know that borders fences are effective. They don't put them up to spend the "governments money" again they put them up to provide security to the countries society. Which leads me to my next contention. 2C:Keeps illegal people out It is really simple people come and go but the reason border fences are provided is to keep the illegal people out. The people that are surrounded by the border are the ones that we try to keep from coming to the Americas. The reason we don't allow them to come is because they cause the problems, and the truth is we always have to be the situation. Also the government doesn't hurt the people the people hurt them self. They know the laws of the border fences and still people try to cross the border. Again it is simple we have to keep illegal immigrants out. The way we do this is by border fences. This leads me to my final contention. 3C: Also keeps the illegal drugs out If we keep the illegal people out then we can also keep the drug wars/drug lords out. just like 9/11 people can just come in an make a big mess. See if we restrict the drugs and the people from coming in it lowers the catastrophe from the income. Without the border fences drug dealers can come and go. This is the last thing we have on our laundry list, is for the people from other countries ruining the America civilization. So basically the one thing we want for the America's people is safety. We most certainly can not achieved that without out border fences. The reason why I provide my contentions again is because the Pro shows the case with great contentions. You can counter them many time but the Pro still upholds his side. The negative failed to show you that border fences are bad since I refuted every single one of his argument and show that they are invalid. The negative is this round must prove that defending his argument,well it is worth defending. But No the con cannot even believe in his case. He contradicts himself by showing that Life is not important. I strongly believe that my case is strong due to the arguments that I provided. In a debate the negative must show that the pro cannot uphold his side. But in the other hand I the Pro refuted and brought up arguments the Neg could not even provide the right evidence. Therefore vote Pro I provide the greatest case in this debate. The purpose of the debate is to bring up contentions with a reason. It never stated that the contentions must be defended with sources. Therefore my contentions are worth defending. In ending to keep the society alive we must provide border fences. Therefore simply vote Pro. Thank You