never leaving hell after judgement

I would first like to state that I do not necessarily take this side outside of this debate. I am uncertain, but I don't out-right consider it wrong. But for this debate I am taking the con side full on. If my opponent is good mabey I will have a definitive oppion afterwards. taking the Pro side means defending the tipical christian view, as if you are wishing to argue with an athiest perspective that there is no hell to start with, that would not contradict the my side but embrace it an new extream. when I say 'leaving hell' I am not asking you defend the position from experinces like Mr Wieses (see video) http://www.youtube.com... , This is why I included the term 'Judgement' in the top so that I could not argue with someone elses possible experinces that clearly are only for the purpose of making someone belive or motivate to reach out to those who dont. after judgement means not going to hell breifly as a warning but rather after the warnings are up. In essence my position is that of Universleism, sorta. But I dont have to argue that all get out, only that all could, which allows room for the possibility that some never do because they hold themselves there. The primary argument against universleism is that in the bible it uses the greek word 'anios' wich can only be translated as eternal or everlasting. That this leaves no room for filling in the blanks ourselves on time duration. but Traditional teachings about Hell and Heaven is that time is irrelevant there, for eternity is outside of time, it occurse as if at the same instante as every instant in the past, present, and future. So if one were to go to ethier of these two places, Heven or Hell, and then leave to somewhere else, How long would you have to state you there? The only descriptive term avalible is 'for eternity' because it is in eternity. If you left Heven or Hell and returned here on Earth, and someone gave binoculers to see into Heven or Hell at the present moment, I propose you would infact still see yourself there (witchever you were in, Heven or Hell), because there there is no time there. If are there ever, you are there always, even if you leave. plus this would provide room for theology that explains true purpose for hell's fire. If they can not be reconsiled, why not have anihalationism be true? after all they no longer can be prepared for any function stuck in hell forever to never leave, no legistical value is accomplished from there continued existance. I am not judgeing god on a permenant stay being cruel or just, only noting a lack of constructive purpose. But fire is often used as poetry for our trails that make us grow. the exersise of endurance that makes us stronger individuals. and best of all, its association with the purefication of metals. the kind of character that is associated with being sentanced to hell, if we were to ask 'what would it take to make them good'. Well Hell's fire may be the only way. Now an mabey an individual could have solidified there anger against god in this life that there will against God might fundamentaly hold themselves in Hell, despite the fires. But there are no more extream means conceavible to implement after this so they do end up stuck there forever. So to recap: 1) This place does not include time. 2) without times relevance, if you are there ever, you are there always, regardless of your departure. 3) annialationism makes legistical sense in dealing with an unreconcileble soul. 4) 'Fire' methephoric or not, could potentialy be used as a reconcilling tool for the worst case scenario's. 5) even granted 4, it may not be inevitable that it will break a soul to Gods will, even if its the only way possible. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://flyinabove.bloghi.com... http://www.poemhunter.com...