It isn't wrong for a person to be gay.

Well, you just turned this argument to a new topic! So there is no right or wrong? So you would not have a problem with me driving to your home, knocking on your door, and when you answer, I will stab you 20 times in the chest until you are dead, and I will simply walk away as if nothing serious happened. Do you know why, because it is not wrong. Why should anyone judge me for killing you for any reason when there is nothing wrong about it? You"re just simply viewing life as a bag of chemicals. Why should it be wrong for a bag of chemicals to do something to another bag of chemicals? If there is no right or wrong, if there is no morality, then there will be chaos. Because simply put with your statement, we do not need a police force, or an army. We do not need to take action against terrorist attacks. I can go about rapeing any girl I like, I can kill whoever I want, I can do anything I please, because there is no right or wrong. I should not go to jail for what I have done. Another issue is there would be no centralization for organization. Infact, if we did not have rules for right and wrong, we would have no countries. There would be no one to rally behind. We would all be single minded in our motives and opinions. Man can make their own morality, but the idea of morality was not created by man. God gave us rules, we did not create them. I also want to put out a thought provoking statement. All these nations have been formed, but so far the U.S., in it"s first 200 years of life, has been the most successful nation in the world, and it is one of the only few nations, that have been founded on Biblical principles. Just think about it. My response to some of the comments: Geho89, when animals do something, does that mean humans should do it too? Just because animals exert strange sexual behavior, does not mean that humans should mimic it. Like we would not lick our selves clean like a cat, or shed our hair on our bodies, do to changes in temperature. That"s what animals do. We got showers and clothes to take care of use for that. How is it that when God is brought up, it is biased? I will go out on an assumption that Pro is atheist. So he is basing his argument on that, "Man chooses what is right and wrong." To your statement, pro too, is being biased. He just did not bring up any religious beliefs in league with his ideal. Being a young man of the faith (you and I) I would hope that this would become clear. If we argue anything, on a topic on life, without the guidance of God"s teachings, then we have already lost the argument. There is no middle ground to debating. You are either arguing on their view or the view you posses. Plus, this debate is listed in religion" Breakingamber 1, your statement brings up an entirely new debate. You are basing your argument in favor of pro. If I were to fight on that idea, then there would be no reason for me to be in this debate, because pro would be right. There has to be to opposing ideas in order for there to be an argument. If you wish, you could go set up your own debate on that statement, and see the outcome. TheDeAndreOglesby, can you give me "undisputable evidence" on the origin of life? Religion is faith on ideas that cannot be proven by science. You cannot believe Evolution without faith either, for no man posses the knowledge at the time of creation. No one was there. No one can recreate the event. No one cannot go back and observe it. Science cannot prove it"s origin. Christianity cannot prove its origin either. All we have are 6,000 year old documents, and the interpretation of today"s conditions. Religion is necessary to bring up. Without it, we have nothing to start our philosophy with. We would be better off trying to explain on how the existence of everything is just simply one big potato through the logical findings of cosmology.