should September 2 be a holiday

Rebuttals1: 'Well again true to Afghanistan war. Butt there are people who survived from the holocaust. And honestly this was the last war when most of the world together.'...What's your point, PRO?2: 'Also I meant graves I'm typing on a phone don't have a computer.'Alright, as for Germany not having graves for those who died in World War II, that claim is unwarranted. I can't take that argument seriously without it being warranted. 3: 'People don't realize that if England and America stayed out of the war than Nazis would rule Europe and god knows what else.'Drop. That statement is irrelevant. 4: ' America was attacked.'What makes America more special than other countries getting attacked? America gets attacked all the time, and America was also attacked in the American Revolutionary War, American Indian War, The War of 1812 and the Mexican American War [1]. It would be unfair to give one war group an honor day and the other honor groups nothing, so we give all war groups an honor day--Remembrance/Veteran's Day. 5: 'The world was attacked.'Not only is that not true, as not every country was attacked in World War II, following PRO's logic, the world was attacked in World War I as well [2]. It would be unfair to give one war group an honor day and the other war group nothing, so we give both an honor day--Remembrance/Veteran's Day. 6: 'Different from ww1'Drop. Just because a war was different than another doesn't make it deserve an honor day any more than the other war. 7: ' People lied too.'Yeah, and people still don't know which country caused World War I [3], so obviously a country must have not told the truth either. 8: 'Millions of innocent people killed.'Millions of innocent people were killed in World War I as well [4]. It would be unfair to give one war group an honor day and the other war group nothing, so we give both groups an honor day--Remembrance/Veteran's Day. 9: 'And yes there is stuff.like isis killing Christians.'I fail to see how that statement is relevant. ISIS is a terrorist group in the middle east, is it not? Could you elaborate on that, PRO?10: 'Know your point on Vietnam. That wasn't are war.'By definition, the Vietnam War was a war [5]. Even if it wasn't a war in the eyes of the U.S., by the definition of the word, the Vietnam War was technically war, as there is nothing in the definition about both participants seeing it as a war. 11: 'They didnt attack us like pearl harbor.'Again, the U.S. gets attacked all the time, and it doesn't necessarily mean more if the Japanese attacks the U.S.A. than another country.ConclusionI will take a similar approach with my conclusion as I did last time: World War II was no more tragic than other wars combined. All wars are tragic. You cannot single out those who were involved in World War II as deserving more honor than the many more people who fought in every other war. That would be unfair. Therefore, we should not have a holiday that honors people who were involved in World War II. I appreciate debating with PRO as well. This has been a real time-burner. Back to PRO. Citations[1]-http://en.wikipedia.org...[2]-http://www.mapsofworld.com...[3]-http://www.bbc.com...[4]-http://en.wikipedia.org...[5]-http://thevietnamwar.info...