BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The Christian God does not exist

1. The Problem of Evil.My opponent brings up the point that God could, instead of allowing event x to occur (which would produce relatively 3 evil and 10 good), create event y (which would produce no evil at all and 7 good).This might sound like the obvious solution, but everything is not so black-and-white as my opponent implies. Not all issues of morality can be reduced to a simple numbers game, like the classic train-track problem (do you pull the lever to redirect the train's route to a different track where it will run over one man, or leave it as is where it will run over five?).And, more importantly, not all results can be achieved without some kind of sacrifice. This is, after all, the nature of Christianity itself. Even God Himself made a sacrifice on the cross for mankind.For example, you need to sacrifice your time and energy to respond to this debate in the hopes that people will read it and vote for you. The administrators of the site could just have you skip all that nonsense and make everyone vote for you anyway, but would you really get that same feeling of accomplishment?I can't argue for what end result evil has (nor do I have to in this debate), but I can suggest the possibility it is much like this debate is necessary for your feeling of accomplishment. And so long as this possibility remains unrefutted so does the resolution remain unaffirmed.2. Omnipotence/Omniscience/Logic."In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began." [Paul 1:2]"Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man" [James 1:13]The Christian God is not capable of maximal omnipotence, for He cannot do anything that would go against His nature as the greatest conceivable being (like lie, sin, or make Himself impotent), as supported by these Biblical verses.God cannot just say "Let there be a round circle" because (for starters) you don't even know what a "round circle" is. The term holds absolutely no meaning.
The Christian God does not exist

I. The Problem of EvilI understand that evil may not exist as we know it, but in the bible, there is an objective evil. That's all. I understand your point that all of God's punishments to us in our small lives might be for our own good, but the existence of Satin is one of objective evil, in the bible. "To claim an omnibenevolent must eliminate this perceived evil would be to implicitly claim there is no greater end, but this would be impossible knowledge to have. " That's not the case. An omnibenevolent being won't allow any evil for what's within his power. And everything is within God's power. Meaning evil can't exist. He can still do the objective good without the objective evil. That's definite. He can figure out a way, he's all knowing, and all powerful. I understand your point. Let's put it in numbers. Event X occurs It produces 3 evil, It produces 10 good. You're saying that since the net worth of Event X is 7 good, he will allow it, but that doesn't fit the definition of an omnibenevolent being. He can't allow evil. If he wants to create 7 good, he'll create another eventEvent Y occursIt produces 0 evil,It produces 7 good. The same net good is produced, but there is no evil to be seen. That's what God MUST do as is his omnibenevolent nature. You can argue that God isn't omnibenevolent, but in the definitions we did define him as a being who's omnibenevolent. II. Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually exclusive/III. Omnipotence and logic are mutually exclusive"But Jesus looked at them and said, With men this is impossible, but all things are possible with God. – Matt. 19:26""For with God nothing is ever impossible and no word from God shall be without power or impossible of fulfillment. – Luke 1:37"Since we are speaking of the God of Christianity, the Bible Verses are directly correlated to his characteristics. In both of these quotes, it's stressed that although something might be impossible for man (creating a round square), it's not impossible for God. "no word from God shall be without power or impossible of fulfillment"This means if God says "Let there be a round circle! " There is a round circle. As is such, the following holds true.3. The Christian God has the power to create a round square4. To assert a being can create a round square, is illogical. Meaning that my proof in whole, is true.
The Christian God does not exist

1. The Problem of EvilThe point I was trying to make here is that "evil" may not truly exist as you and I know it. Much like a toddler being pricked with shots, we may not be able to perceive that certain state of affairs we find in the world are not "evil" but are a means to a greater end. An omnibenevolent being would have the disposition to allow such "evils" to exist so that their greater ends may be met.To claim an omnibenevolent must eliminate this perceived evil would be to implicitly claim there is no greater end, but this would be impossible knowledge to have.2. Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually exclusive /3. Omnipotence and logic are mutually exclusiveBasically, all my opponent has done is say he's never heard of this different definition of "omnipotence" and asks for an official source to support it. Apologies for not doing so in my previous round. Here you go, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu....Here, they refer to the two types of omnipotence as "Essentially omnipotent" (what I refered to as "maximally" or "absolutly") and "Accidently omnipotent" (what I referred to as "commonly"). An essentially omnipotent being, such as the Christian God, can bring about any state of affairs except those which render it non-omnipotent. Therefore, an essentially omnipotent being and a rock so heavy it cannot be lifted are mutually exclusive things and cannot exist in the same state of affairs.Note that my opponent's source for his definition of "omniscience", wikipedia, also lists this definition: "A deity able to do anything that is in accord with its own nature". Well, being omnipotent is part of God's nature. Therefore, He cannot do something that would make Himself no longer omnipotent, such as create a rock too heavy to lift.
Abortion

In the debate that proceeds this opening statement.You are going to learn much of this societies view on abortion.You are going to learn why my opponent is against it.What my opponents beliefs are.Most of all you are going to learn your beliefs.How you feel on this issue is key for either my opponent or Me.Neither of us can win without you. So please express how you feel.Make sure you're vote is the whole truth and nothing but the truth.Without you(the voter) us debaters have nothing but an unanswered debate by the people.Please choose a winner.Please choose a second chance for the people.Most of all choose the right thing.Make this right America.Make this are constitutional right.Make it abortion!
Abortion

I also have a few requests for the voter: 1) Please vote, "Tie" for grammar/spelling and conduct unless myself or my opponent shows otherwise. 2) Please read the ENTIRE debate before voting. 3) Don't vote only on your views 4) Please make the appropriate comments I am very much pro-life and I am so pleased to be in this debate. I shall make my opening arguments: 1) The fetus' right to life is greater than a woman's right to choose. 2) Abortion is the same as murder 3) A fetus, though developing, can still feel and has senses. 4) In a case of rape, proper medical treatment can prevent an un-wanted pregnancy. 5) If you do not want the baby, adoption is always a better option 6) There are serious emotional side-effects to an abortion . http://www.americanpregnancy.org... 7) There are health-risks for an abortion . http://www.abortioninformation.net... 8) Have you ever thought about what happens during an abortion? . http://www.abort73.com... these are pictures of an after-abortion along with a few videos. Please search this whole site. That is enough for now. Good luck to pro and I am looking forward to this debate.
Sin

But Jesus pointed out that looking upon a woman with lust was comitting adultery in one's heart. Also, he said that anger without just cause was tantamount to murder. Jesus made no distinction between the attitude of the heart and the work of one's hands. To imply the work of one's hands as the basis of sin is to assert that it is possible to save oneself by righteous deeds, which is nullified by the concept of grace. This is the problem of religion; it always seeks change from the outside in, but faith changes a person from the inside out. A person's heart determines their actions, not the other way round. All in all, a person produces action toward the end that it will produce happiness in the end. The lie that we labor under when we persist in sin is that it will make us happy. The truth that we labor under when we commit righteous deeds according to God's expectations is that He has promised us joy as a return.
This poem "Autobiography-Of-A-Pthirus-Pubis" is full of beautiful imagery and lyrical lines

This poem Autobiography-Of-A-Pthirus-Pubis is full of beautiful imagery and lyrical lines http://www.scribd.com... quote " Jade butterfly painted on Chinese silk-screen Oh bud animate Flowery form Vibrating Curling Fluttering Petals delicate Curl back The orifice revealing Pinkish anemone "
This poem "Autobiography-Of-A-Pthirus-Pubis" is full of beautiful imagery and lyrical lines

I bet you dont even know what a Pthirus-Pubis is but you did not comment on the beautiful imagery and lyrical lines quote " Jade butterfly painted on Chinese silk-screen Oh bud animate Flowery form Vibrating Curling Fluttering Petals delicate Curl back The orifice revealing Pinkish anemone "
This poem "Autobiography-Of-A-Pthirus-Pubis" is full of beautiful imagery and lyrical lines

This poem, much like all of the poems written by Colin Dean, is absolute sh*t and shouldnt even be classified as poetry for it is an insult to what poetry actually is. It is pure garbage, a bore to read, a waste of ones time, pointless, and watching paint dry on a wall is more enlightening then reading this pathetic attempt of a poem. There is nothing beautiful or lyrical about the poem, and it is not even worthy to be used as toilet paper since you cannot clean poop with sh*t, which is what this poem is.... Sh*t... If I were to pee into a bowl of spaghetti O's and then let my cat throw up in it, it would most likely produce a better poem then this poem, thats how bad it is. If this poem were a fetus, abortion would be legalized throughout the world tomorrow with 100% approval, thats how bad it is If this poem were a building, it would deserve to have an airplane be flown into it, thats how bad it is If this poem were a tree, it would deserve to be chopped down, ground up into paper, and then have a better poem be written on it, thats how bad it is If this poem were to be made into a movie, it would cause mass suicides everywhere to those who bothered to see it and the author would be shot in the head after being convicted for crimes against humanity, thats how bad it is. If this poem were a fruit, it would be a fruit that taste so terrible and look so visually repulsive and unappealing, thats how bad it is If this poem were an alter boy for the biggest pedophile priest in America, he would turn himself in rather then go over it, thats how bad it is. If this poem was a young boy with a football scholarship, the Penn State football staff wouldnt want to touch him, thats how bad it is If this poem were a president, it would make Obamas administration and handling of the economy look like Reagans, thats how bad it is If this poem were a sport, it would be the stupidest and most pathetic sport ever invented in the history of forever, thats how bad it is If this poem were a country, it would make Somalia look as stable as Sweden, thats how bad it is. If this poem was a love story......................................................................... It would still be better then Twilight
Where is Know-where man. Please come forward out of nowhere so we can see you.

Well, it's the idealist 111year old. where did you go for the last 2 days or so? To nowhere land or was it know-where land? I wasn't expecting you back at all. But here you are. Good for you. with your reply of 1/ Wha when one is especially confused, frazzled, or surprised. can be used online or in person. 2/ wha 1. To actually care 2. A shorter way of saying what 3. The opposite of meh. Guy: That drawing's cool Guy 2: Meh Guy: Your dog got ran over Guy 2: Meh Guy: You have AIDS Guy 2: Wha??? 3/ Wha A shorter way of using What. Wha? 4/ Wha Expresses confusion, disbelief. Often accompanied by rubbing and clearing of eyes with both hands. We're sending oil INTO Iraq!? Whaaa?!? 5/ Wha short for "what"... used when your more confused than usual Person 1: hey i just know i that heard? Person 2: Wha?? 6/ Wha short for what wha' 'appen? man, i 'unno. 7/ Wha.. means: What? a guestion can be used as a form of expression of a greeting -You know wha...? -I won a million dollars! reply:...Wha?!? -Hey dude, this is my new girlfriend April say Hi...reply: Whaaa! -you spill fruit punch all over my new car seats!.....Wha..! #what#huh#yay#hi#oh#sorry 8/ ?WhA? I suppose you might just have to add your expression meme to the list as your's doesn't https://www.urbandictionary.com... To say nothing is it golden, a harsh reply or just you can't find the word and the word is the bird? A know-where nowhere man or is it the nowhere know-where man? The know-where nowhere man or is it the nowhere know-where man? Or is it A know-where nowhere man or is it a nowhere know-where man. Just because the way it is written doesn't mean what it says. This is the importance of, to be humane instead of, to be apathetic. Monotone abuse of the mind should be kept to one's self-don't you think?
Where is Know-where man. Please come forward out of nowhere so we can see you.

Three have come forward into the limelight a 111-year old idealist, a 31-year old undecided religious fence sitter and a 56-year-old undecided atheist fence sitter. Against 2far4u2 the 52-year old, Christian that is one of many apprentices of Jesus Christ ever since I was but four years old. Jesus Christ is not the know-where man or the nowhere man. Existence creator is not the nowhere man or the know-where man and I am not the know-where man or the nowhere man. So who could have the Bettles been speaking of within the song over 40 years ago? How about the psychopaths and the sociopaths that hide behind a matured structured monotone tune and call it, to be apathetic. Maybe a new belief called apathetic for all of those odds and sods to be as one and worship there own image as the boy that fell in love with his own reflection. If you cannot gather that, what I have put forward is past, present and future tense then most likely have a disposition within your own cognitive thought processes of your own frontal lob that is what drives rational reasoning, forward projection, mirror imaging and many more tasks. Was that healthy criticism or an ad-hominine as it wasn't the lowest form of wit, sarcasm. Or could there be some truth for our three lost souls of many? Don't forget don't say I as it's we find the offender guilty. Not I find the offender guilty.
Where is Know-where man. Please come forward out of nowhere so we can see you.

He's a real know-where man living in his know-where land living all his nowhere plans for nobody. He's as blind as he can be, see 's but what he want's to see. Isn't there any humility as to be humane. Now-where man please listen you don't know what you're missing nowhere man the world is know-where without your command. He doesn't have a point of view knows not where he's going too. Know-where man can you see any of us at all. Apathy is not the road to happiness. Come on people's who want's or needs to go on this funny ride with me? The tongue is as a double-edged sword it cuts both ways. Practising; Empathy, Humility, Sympathy and Cooperation throughout life, create's an understanding of the surroundings that we are subjected to, doing this teaches us to talk to each other, so we can speak with each other and not at each other. Healthy Criticisms; "Mark Twain" the best weapon people have is laughter. "2far4u2" Wisdom is to have the ability to have a structured conversation with the village idiot and accepting that tomorrow it's my turn to be the village idiot. Explaining complexities in the simplest manner is just like nuts and bolts. The hardest part is knowing how to put it all back together. It's all been said before but some take "unintentionally or intentionally" with them to there grave. Bitter is but a sour taste or a foul smell or a little noise that becomes loud or a picture that is not pleasing to the eye of the beholder. You can't touch bitter as you can't feel bitter so to be bitter is nothing and it's nothing to be bitter. It's all disappointing. Does the young grow old and the old grow young or does the old grow young and the young grow old. What a merry go round. Peace be with you. All praise and glory belong to Nature our own existence creator of the intelligent design of the known universe.
Where is Know-where man. Please come forward out of nowhere so we can see you.

好吧A292;%027;不是一大堆書z90;動漫A292;對世界漫畫守#703;者的瘋狂插圖是$939;動中的#433;歌A292;因為幽(664;或$938;戲在笑聲/#609;卑之中有更大的#299;%323;性A292;因為無法找到一種更好的方式來放置它%027;些天使們害怕$393;!879;$889;條$335;$208;出一條更具爭#696;性的理#299;A292;我們%117;$984;擇成為多(636;無知的人A292;不$942;是我們!258;己的傲慢提升了$889;個%276;&475;的&957;!126;z90; 在秋天之前的傲慢&577;"255;在單#519;濫用心&728;之後z90;冷漠或#731;我們只是稱它和什(636;來拼寫檢查一次性$000;$012;z90;正如缺乏引力是在沮喪的&936;域z90; 無"389;A292;知$947;在哪#041;的人z90; 我喜歡你的名字符合你的主'636;信念z90;或者我有你的&957;像名稱%679;#492;的想法A311;新$554;作為是一個#494;#712;困&627;的新$554;z90; 和平!287;你同在z90;
Where is Know-where man. Please come forward out of nowhere so we can see you.

Well wasn't that a load of gobblygook. Anima, loony toons to the guardians of the world cartoons are poetry in motion that is more explanatory, because of humour or as a game has room to move within laughter/humility that for to not being able to find a better way of putting it go where angels fear to tread that lead the way for a more controversial understanding of how ignorant we all choose to be is no more then our own arrogance raising it's ugly head. Pride before the fall hides behind the monotone abuse of the mind. Apathy or let's just call it disponsable and what comes up with spell check disposable responsible. Just as a lack of gravity is within the realms of despondency. Nowhere, Know-where man. I like your name carnew in accordance within your Juche belief. Or have I got the wrong idea with your avatars name? newcar as to be lexicdys as to be a dyslexic new car. Peace be with you carnew.
Where is Know-where man. Please come forward out of nowhere so we can see you.

First, you can not help children. But the problems of the world without any effort. Every student is ready. Here you will find an important teacher, companies and corporations. Good people. It's important that the issue is relevant. Look here. Give the whole country. Do not be afraid and afraid There is no connection, no competition, but I do not want it.So Garfield is the strongest freaking western evening. that's right
Where is Know-where man. Please come forward out of nowhere so we can see you.

Life is but a pubic hair definitely standing upon the toilet bowl, justly waiting to be pissed off into the accolades of a notice that wasn't worth noticing, to begin with. Until the toilet roll asked, have you got the message yet? Do you sit down or stand up pubic hair? So the 111-year-old idealist that is a known all knows nothing know-where man has nowhere to go then; ?WhA? ?WhA? ?WhA? Are no more than sh#t on a stick or a sponge on a stick? Let us see if you have the ability to comprehend the message written on the toilet paper every time you wipe your a#s-chin.
Paul Walker got what he deserved

"This movie might glorify reckless driving" Con agrees that the movie glorifies reckless driving. "but it is mostly society that are fault here. If the people driving their cars had more than a peanut as a brain they would understand the dangers of this type of driving and maybe they wouldn't drive." Well, the reality as you admit that they do have a peanut for a brain. It's immoral to contribute to a phenomenon that kills tons of people, regardless of whether those people are idiots or not. It would have been the morally superior thing, for Paul Walker to refuse to take part in the film. He If anything Rob Cohen for directing the film, Vin Diesel for the most horrendous driving I have ever seen and Universal Studios for not looking at the negative and positive sides of this movie, should all be "dead"" If other actors and people involved in the FF films deserved to die than certainly Walker does. Especially since he had a bigger part than Vin Diesel.
Paul Walker got what he deserved

This movie might glorify reckless driving but it is mostly society that are fault here. If the people driving their cars had more than a peanut as a brain they would understand the dangers of this type of driving and maybe they wouldn't drive. Also it is not Paul Walkers fault that all those people are dead, mainly because Paul Walker was just trying to make a living by playing the leading role in this film. If anything Rob Cohen for directing the film, Vin Diesel for the most horrendous driving I have ever seen and Universal Studios for not looking at the negative and positive sides of this movie, should all be "dead."
Paul Walker got what he deserved

Paul Walker has starred in the Fast and Furious series as most of you already know. This is a movie franchise that glorifies reckless driving and has been the cause of many a deaths. It seems like after the release of each film, traffic deaths go up immensely. http://www.people.com... http://www.theguardian.com... The stars participation in this franchise has caused many deaths. It is only fitting that he dies driving recklessly, when he himself has participated in an increase in unrelated traffic fatalities as a result of perpetuating reckless driving as something cool. If you think about it. The only way he could make up for causing so many deaths, was to die in a way that hopefully remedies some of the damage he has already done to society.
Lesbian vampire killers is the perfect movie

<< ===REBUTTAL:=== I cited because it is a compilation of reviews from all reviewers. It given an unbiased view and merely states what critics think. ===PRO:=== >>certian groups such as blacks , straight femals , fat chicks will ruin this movies status as perfect if they are there , if they are not its perfect. << ===REBUTTAL:=== My opponent states that if a certain group watches a movie then it is imperfect. He says if a straight female watches it, the movie is then imperfect. I would like to say my opponents argument is henceforth defeated due to the fact my sister has seen Lesbian Vampire Killers. She is a straight female, and also a bit fat, but nonetheless has viewed the movie. It is therefore imperfect.
Lesbian vampire killers is the perfect movie

you say sci-fi fans wont find it entertaining my repsonse - yes they will you say that no real man would actually liek it as there are many christians etc my response - notice the use of the words real men , all men who are real men would enjoy lesbian vampires. also i noticed how you had no response on my comment about wifes , true that isnt it ? you say that "Bad humour is the opposite of funniness. For example, if I said 'Why did the chicken cross the road' and you replied 'Why? ' and I replied 'For no particular reason, he was bored and the lights had changed colour' then you would not find it funny. " my response - i found that joke hilarious you say that because there are certain groups of people not welcome such a blacks christians etc then it is not perfect . my response - certian groups such as blacks , straight femals , fat chicks will ruin this movies status as perfect if they are there , if they are not its perfect. thank you vote for pedro i mean me.