You cannot absolutely disprove the existence of the Christian God.

"Con" wrote the following: "Firstly if i see the word "perception " again i might have to kill myself. My opponent is confusing what we believe to be perceptive and what is reality,you cannot in the majority of circumstances confuse and use both of these terms." First, the comment where you write that you may have to kill yourself if you see the word perception again...This is not an argument. This is fluff. Thank you. Furthermore, I am not confusing perception and reality. What you perceive to be real to you personally, is your reality. There is not one absolute reality for everyone. There are different realities due to differences in individuals' perception. You then write the following: "My opponent explains without any true clarification that people can make up their own reality's, and facts do not really matter You then describe an individuals "hallucination" to be a relative reality which it is not,,at the time to an individual it can seem like they are lost in their own reality it does not necessarily mean they have lost all control of what they believe to be real Perceptions are there to give people an indication and opinion on certain situations/topics, these perceptions are a psychological matter and do not weigh up as much as reality as wee see it or facts, therefore you cannot truly believe that perceptions can form a true reality." You have just made up your reality where you believe that there is one absolute reality. Your perception has only allowed you to humor the idea of what is possible according to YOUR perception. You have been taught that there is one ultimate reality for everyone. Therefore, your mind is already set in a pattern of thinking. Your brain has been programmed to follow certain rules of thinking. A mind that already has parameters set up cannot grasp this concept. I understand that to you, there is one ultimate reality. I also understand that this is a possibility. It cannot be proven or disproven absolutely. Likewise you can neither prove nor disprove that there are many realities relative to the individual. Then you wrote: "Reality, in everyday usage, means "the state of things as they actually exist." Literally, the term denotes what is real; in its widest sense, this includes everything that is, whether or not it is observable or comprehensible. Reality in this sense includes being and sometimes is considered to include nothingness, as well. By contrast, the term existence is often restricted solely to being I quote you here. There are no "facts". There are only opinions of reality." That is a ridiculous statement to be quite frank of course there is facts, and its not based to just ones "reality" many studies that have been carried out to prove something is real has been done with many scientists , Philosophers etc, Many people whom share the same "reality""" If reality is "the state of things as they actually exist"...I would ask, "According to whom?" This is individual matter. You cannot say with absolute certainty that there is one absolute reality. Read my previous comment. It should clear this up. Yes. There are no absolute "facts". Something may appear to be a fact you personally, but not to someone else. You write that scientists, philosophers, etc. share the same reality. This is most certainly not the case. Some scientists were convinced that the Earth was the center of the universe, while some were absolutely convinced that the Sun was the center of the universe. It appears to me that their realities were different. In a thousand years, humans could find that there are planets that are invisible to the human eye. They could find out that we revolve around an invisible planet. Reality changes based on perception. Then you wrote the following: "Moreover, although i have nothing against your idealism, your basing everything on perceptions without acknowledging facts, - Perceptions come from facts and beliefs, The majority of people share the same insight in to religion from what have been told not what they 'perceive" or what their "reality:' tells them." This is not idealism. Like I wrote before, there are no absolute facts. Then you wrote: "Therefore i am in complete opposition from my opponent, If everybody was to justify what they believe from their own reality the world would be an even bigger mess, we would have criminals walking the streets,also there is a thing called "incorrect perceptions- If you had a skeptic/ nasty opinion on someone who was found out to be innocent, your perception of them would change thus you can honestly say " i made an incorrect perception on that person"" Do people justify what they believe from their own reality? This is what you are doing...is it not? You would not say, "I made an incorrect perception." You would say that your perception was fine. As a juror, you make a judgement based on testimony/evidence. It is your duty to perceive based on the testimony/evidence. The perception could have been "correct" to the individual making the decision based on the evidence/testimony that he/she was shown. Then you wrote the following: "I think this is more of a philosophical argument but you cannot base everything on a psychological matter based on one individual. just like there is as much evidence to tell us god is real, there is much to tell us that hes not ..Although its good to have a spiritual open mind it all comes down to facts and what weighs more against what , Most people believe in something because that's what they have been told too, what evidence there is to read, and not asserting everything on what their imagination tells them." If you don't base everything in this case on the perception/reality of the individual, then you are making the assumption that everyone should see things the same way. You are assuming that there is a wrong way to perceive and a right way to perceive. You are dealing in absolutes. This is like saying there is good and evil. That is completely subjective and relative. You cannot absolutely disprove the existence of the Christian God. I rest my case. Thank you for the good points.