trinity['s concept] exists in the bible

Thank you for your answers, the first thing I would like to say about the arguement of my opponent: seems that he misunderstood the challenge: I did not ask him to prove that Jesus or any other two is god. I asked him to give verses/references which talk about the deity of fatehr, god and spirit. in the first arguement of his, he brought verses about the godness of Jesus and asked me to reply, I do not need reply in this debate, since the debate is to show verses, not to clarify nor analyse them. RESPONSES:1. PRO showed me verses which talk about Jesus as god, I agree with him and I see no need to [try to] refute or answer him. so, with the first arguement of his, he completed 1/3 of the challenge: HE talked about the godness of the SON. remaining two. even me can give everal verses about JEsus a god from the epistles.____________________________________________________________________________________2. int he second arguement of HIS, PRO showed me[/us] verses which talk about the godness of the father the god.but he said: {yet Scripture reveals the Father as creator (Isa 64:8), and the Son (Col 1:16-17; Heb 1:2, 8-10), and the Holy Spirit (Ps 104:30; Job 26:13; 33:4) } since he showed us the verses about the godness of Jesus[/son] and Yahweh[/father] I see no need to talk about them, I am going to talk about the spirit here. [underlined part.]PRO gave this references: Ps 104:30; Job 26:13; 33:4Now, I am going to copy ps104:30 first: Psalm 104:30 New International Version (NIV) 30 When you send your Spirit, they are created, and you renew the face of the ground. http://www.biblegateway.com...this verse does not say unambiguously that the spirit is the creator. by using ambiguous interpretations this verse can be interpreted as "it says that the spirit is creator" but even PRO shows us that it says spirit is creator, then he does not complete the challenge for the godness of spirit, all he will do is to show that spirit is also creator, but the challenge is to show reference which talks about the godness of the spirit, not his creativity. and at the same time he will make one more contradiction to the bible [if this contradiction is not already discovered]the contradiction can be made by this interpretation is: is Yahweh the creator of all things by himself?Isaiah 44:24 says: yes, he created everything by himself. I am the Lord, the Maker of all things, who stretches out the heavens, who spreads out the earth by myselfthis verse says: no. there are somethings created by not Yahweh, spirit. When you send your Spirit, they are created, and you renew the face of the ground.job26:13By his breath the skies became fair; his hand pierced the gliding serpent. it does not say the spirit is creator.then, he said: {Combine this with the plural pronouns "us" and "our" in Genesis 1:16 and the trinitarian has an airtight case. }first of all, this is not plural of numbers, in semantic languages it is plural of degree/respect. I can speak 1 semiti language [but not hebrew], in languages like this, when you are talking with somebody and if you consider yourself as greater than him then instead of I "we" is used. For example:if I am a general of the army and you are an ordinary soldier, then when I am talking to you I will say: "Listen to us" instead of listen to me.but if my opponent is going to say "no, I do not accept this definition of yours" then that verse does not become triunity, triunity is one thing, but "us and our is for more than one." I can use that verse for "MONOTHEISM", for consistency, he needs to agree that christianity is monotheistic religion because in genesis1:16 god said "us and our" which means more than one gods. and monotheism is not trinity. in both ways, this does not become trinity.then my opponent said: {If Jesus and the Holy Spirit are not one God with the Father, then God the Father had help and did not create all things alone, by himself, as he said in Isaiah 44:24. If the trinity is true, harmony comes to the texts.} so, one more absurdity of the bible but I will talk about this part: so, the thing my opponent himslef showed us is not the godness of spirit, he showed us one more error of the bible. the thing he showed us is: In Isaiah44:24 the father says that he is the only creator {by saying: "by myself"}to correct it, PRO needs to show us where it is said that HOLY SPIRIT IS GOD, if he cant, then he will have shown us one more error of the bible.(3) with the third arguement of him, he again used some verses about the godness of jesus, I agree with him, when we look at the epistles from new testament we can read that in several places Jesus is written as god. since the aim of the is NOT to discuss/clarify/debate whetther is true or not, I dont need to refute or reply these, I say: PRO one more time completed the challenge for the godness of Jesus. [/son](4) in the 4th arguement of his my opponent said: {(4) The Holy Spirit has the attributes of God}Does it answer the challenge? no, it does not. having the same attrobute does not mean that that two are the same thing, since diffrent things may have the attribute of each other, it does not complete the challenge. and then he went on:{and is called God:} He is called GOD but by whom? and my opponent gave verses/references:{(Acts 5:3-4; 2 Cor 3:17} first, acts5:3-4: Peter said, “Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? 4 Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.”it doesnot say "HOLY spirit is god", it can be interpreted in this way but at the same time it can be otherwise. if my Opponent can show us how it says spirit is god, I can interprete and show that it says otherwise.2cor2:17:Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.I hope we all know the diffrence between god and lord. but for the sake of debate:lord is generally used for persons who are of higher rank in society. Lord is a title bestowed upon persons who rule others. this is my definition.maybe, by some christians the word lord is used to refer to god, but being used in this way by christians does not make it the same thing. so, this verse does not say that spirit is god.and then he gave some similarities or same attributes of GOD&SON&SPIRIT, by this he argues that it is reference for the godness of the SPIRIT.{The Father is eternal (Ps 90:2), and the Son (Isa 9:6; Mic 5:2), and the Holy Spirit (Heb 9:14)The Father is omniscient (1 John 3:20), and the Son (John 16:30; 21:17), and the Holy Spirit (1 Cor 2:10-11)The Father is omnipresent (1 Kings 8:27; Ps 137:8-18), and the Son (Matt 18:20), and the Holy Spirit. (Ps 137:7)The Father is omnipotent (Dan 4:35), and the Son (Matt 28:18; John 17:10), and the Holy Spirit (Isa 40:12-18)} having the same attributes does not mean that that things are the same one thing.for example, people breathe and at the same time donkeys also breathe. does it mean that donkeys are people or people are donkeys?so, this similarities or same attributes does not mean that they are one thing.(5)in the fifth arguement of his, he again talked about the godness of Jesus. in fact, I consider this arguement is wrong but I dont need to refute this since I agreed with PRO that he showed us verses from bible that talk about the godness of SON[/jesus]SUMMARY: PRO has shown the godness of son and father but he has not shown the reference talk about the godness of spirit. all he did is to interprete some verses as if it says that spirit is god.additional:sometimes when I quoted my opponent, I shortened to have character sufficiency or to avoid character insufficiency.good luck.