Racial profiling is justified

"Just because America focuses on a particular terrorist group doesn't mean it is the largest, I agree, but when you check the statistical data more than 90% middle easterners constitute the entire terror community and carry out the most number of terrorist attacks at home as well as abroad." When you mentioned that statistic, I was quite shocked, it seemed like too large a number to be true. I was right. I searched the statistic and this is what came up: "Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks in America," https://www.globalresearch.ca... I don't really believe you would twist facts that way but this is all I was able to find through searching so if you do have an article with the statistics you mentioned, please post it in your next round. I was unable to find it. "By simply saying that you cannot deny the facts. We have to be PRACTICAL and find the epicentre of these activities if we really mean to eradicate them." I was not able to find any evidence claiming such a statistic was true and as I said earlier, terrorism is everywhere and committed by many people of all colors. It is not connected to race. And I do NOT care if profiling all brown people means we will never have a terrorist from the Middle East again (which is not true regardless). Because one, this is ridiculous unfair to the majority of good Middle Easterners. It is also unfair to people who are brown but not Middle Eastern. People who are mixed or not even of Middle Eastern descent but have brown skin, like Indians, are likely to be mistaken for "terrorists". And two, it doesn't even solve the problem of terrorists from other countries. "When I said, people take responsibility for such incidents I did not mean to say that they all must be accused of it.You are twisting my words.I meant to say that we vehemently oppose such activities do not go by the literal meaning of 'responsibility'." I am sorry for misinterpreting your argument but I still do not understand it. Of course we all want to prevent terrorism but this is not the way to do it. And how does that justify racial profiling? I would argue that a country like India values human rights and yet they still produce terrorists. "Now how the hell did the constitution of the US come in?The ideology of a society does not depend on what is written in the constitution. Many things are written in our religious books. Do we follow them all?Just because it is written in the constitution of a country that Human rights must be valued doesn't mean it is really valued by the masses." Maybe not but that doesn't mean that terrorism is an ideology valued by the masses either. Maybe not everyone in the US completely agrees with the Constitution but that does not mean that a large portion of them do not value human rights. In the US, a large portion of us value human rights. "It depends on the culture, the environment, and the thinking. The people don't really care if their leader is a Nobel laureate or not. I bet that even if all the Nobel laureates go to a terrorist country and preach humanity, they won't succeed. Why? because the thinking of the entire community is like that." You are going into the bigotry argument once again. You say that a Nobel Laureate cannot preach humanity because the entire community thinks like the soldiers I mentioned. What I am saying is that you can still preach human rights (and still believe in human rights) and produce terrorists, and also that these terrorists are not representative of the society. These soldiers committing human rights abuses on the Rohingya Muslims do not represent all of Myanmar. "Of course, exceptions will be there but the basics are the same.It won't change.These people have a false feeling of supremacy and that they are correct and the rest are wrong.No one is born terrorist, he is made one." I do agree terrorists are made. But not necessarily because of their society's beliefs. They are formed by their own thinking and individual circumstances that have radicalized their views. Maybe they hate Christians because some Christians would insult them--and they figured extremism was best. While some people helped along the way that does not mean the society is who is to blame. Who is to blame is the terrorist/terrorist group.