The "Humanitarians" brought not only food to Gaza, but violence and hatred against Israel.

As Con I will be taking the stance that the "Humanitarians" brought aid to Gaza and not violence and hatred against Israel. Some rebuttals to begin with - Then some other key points in subsequent rounds. 'They wanted to increase the world's hatred against Israel and make a political statement by refusing to co-operate with Israel's repeating requests. ' Based on what? This is not a statement with any evidence behind it. Opinions without proof do not make a debate. 'My debate will prove that once again, the world does not realize what's really going on in the middle east, and therefore jumps to conclusions which are extremely inaccurate and based on lies, hatred and even natizm. ' Isn't the debate focusing on Israel/Palestine, or the Middle East as a whole? I'll assume you are referring to Israel/Palestine. I have been following this story on the BBC website who may be inaccurate (not sure about lies) They don't show any hatred and 'Natizm'? What is 'Natizm'? I've googled it and it is either something I have never heard of, or you mean to say Nazism? And I think to say it is based on Nazism is extremely inaccurate - the Nazis opposed and oppressed Jews, not Israelis (Two very different things) Also - 'once again' - possibly semantics, but have you debated this before on this site? If so, I assume you're doing it again as you lost the previous encounter. Your background sections seems to make sense, would have preferred to have seen some sources,websites, newspapers, news channels etc, but I'll take you at your word. 'In the end, as you can clearly sea in the video, IDF soldiers were hurt and the order was given, our soldiers opened fire against those who were armed. ' - Nice choice of words, 'your' soldiers opened fire against those who were armed? So you soldiers were armed also? Paintball guns a maybe, but it is still a weapon. And you mention a pistol, why would you need a live weapon and only one, if for the majority of the task 'your' troops felt paintball guns were good enough? The link speaks of over 600 aid workers trying to bring in aid for the people in Gaza - Note there is no mention of weapons and ammunition on board (Also collate the number of sources they speak to to make these stories as accurate as possible) [1] ' (the threat as i said was that the cargo included ammunition for Hammas besides the food and education material. )' - So this was a preemptive strike? It must have been since no ammunition was found, merely surmised to be there which has gone to the extreme that multiple deaths have occurred over a presumption. Israel were perceived to be in the wrong because instead of allowing the aid through (partly as per the BBC link that - 'IHH is Turkish aid organisation with strong sympathy among Turkey's ruling party, but is banned in Israel, which accuses it of links to Hamas and al-Qaeda') They instead forcibly stopped people trying to get desperately needed aid into the Gaza strip. It may be clichï¿½ but one man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist, a deeply tragic but true statement. 'Israel says it allows about 15,000 tonnes of humanitarian aid into Gaza every week, but the UN says this is less than a quarter of what is needed. ' [1] The overall main point of contention would be that the land itself after the fall of the Kingdom of Judah 2,500 years ago, has exchanged hands many times and changed names: So now no-Jewish Arabs have also had 2,500 years of history in the area. So since the British Mandate of Palestine[2], and the 1947 in favour vote for the Partition of Palestine[3] you now have two groups demanding equal rights to the land -> In a nutshell that is. I don't recall a silent agreement between the world and Russia, if anything I think the USA would be the more vocal opposers to Russia than any other country. [1] . http://news.bbc.co.uk... [2]. http://en.wikipedia.org... [3]. http://en.wikipedia.org...