Metrosexuality Is An Acceptable Lifestyle

Though my opponent has forfieted thats no reason for me not to express my creative freedom. my argument I came up with to give a actual legit reason to take an opposing side to "metrosexuality is an acceptable lifestlye" focused on a different take on what is considered "acceptable" than might have been expected. My opponent was probably wanting a take on that term that involved calling it sinfull or something judgeing by his comments in the comment section. but I will not. at least as a focus, cause I guess vanity is a sin isnt it?making a case from christianity if I were to do such a thing I guess yeah it is not an accaptable thing to claim as your lifestyle. to take as part of how you identify yourself as a person as someone who is proud to be completely vain, is a little akin to homosexuality, though it is a completely deferent sin.But my case I shall make does not require you have faith in any religion at all to get on bord with and agree with me.metrosexuality is defined as follows:a usually urban heterosexual male given to enhancing his personal appearance by fastidious grooming, beauty treatments, and fashionable clotheshttp://www.merriam-webster.com...at its heart such a person who puts so much into there apperence is suffering from a need I think we can all relate to at some point in our lives, being overly concernced about what other people think about us.but this is not good agreed? check out this sources for morehttp://www.ehow.com...http://blog.prestonbailey.com...but a person who claims vainity not only as something there guilty of on occasions, but as their very lifestyle has had to come to a degree of accaptance of it. to accapt that this vanity is simply who they are and will always be, and that they can never just quit being concerned about what other people are going to think of them. so to better be content with there existance they decide that metrosexuality is good enough for themselves.that is the 'accaptable' of the resolution that I am taking on that this should not be. this life should not be 'accapted' and settled for. we need to take on a healthy attitude of saying "thats not good enough" rather than "thats accaptable" lifestlye for ourselves.not just accapting things and saying its not good enough, to not settle, but try to achieve greater is healthy for us not only spiritually in our spiritual growth......http://www.sermonnotebook.org.......but also in matters of personal fitness....http://www.endofthreefitness.com.......and fincancle purchases evenhttp://www.borrowfromnone.com...strive for greater and dont accapt your metrosexuality. strive for the life with less stress in it where your not in a manditory bind everymorning to groom yourself to look nice hoping it will make others like you more cause you wont care about what others think about your apperence.now perhaps my opponent (should he show up for this debate) will make a case that metrosexuals are not grooming themselves for others satisfactions, only their own. should he make that case I ask him, how often does one whow does not live with a mirror floating in front of there face actually get to see there appeance? not often. defenitly not much comparing it to how often your apperence is viewed by all the people you interact with.logically its a concern for what others think in some shape or form thats the only thing that can fuel a concern for ones own apperence.with that I rest my case and am prepared to extend my arguments the remaining rounds most likely, but will give rebuttal to arguments from my opponent if they are ever given.thank you all who bothered to read this