I"m Pro-choice, tell me why you aren"t

I would like to point out that I congratulate you for making it through 5 rounds. Your the 1st one to do it on this topic. Now that that"s done, time to move on to the points: "you"re equating fetuses literally feeding off of a person's body in order to achieve personhood or exist to human-beings who are not reliant on someone's body to exist." Technically poor people are dependant on the bodies of the middle class because they depend on the work of them which requires bodily dependency in a way. A better comparison would be should a woman be forced to nurse her baby? If there were no other alternatives that would keep a baby alive, then yes, because life is more valuable than freedom in part because without life, there would be no freedom. Without freedom, there is a bad life. A bad life is better than no life, otherwise people with bad lives, like slaves would commit suicide more often then they do not. But this is not the case. "How did they not have enough time to get adopted?" Because they were there for 3 years. And most of them got adopted anyway. "if it takes 4 years to adopt the 400,000 kids in the system imagine in 10 years when there are 6million unwanted babies." This statistic is loaded. It"s more like, "if it takes 4 years to adopt the 600,000 kids in the system imagine in 1 year when there are 300,000 unwanted babies." The adoption agency doubles to triples in power. It probably won"t triple since some people will choose to parent their kids and that"s fine. It would probably double the foster kid count which increases the agency's power. "adoption agencies aka foster care systems don"t make themselves look bad to get people to sympathize, they deliberately lie to meet quotas, as was showcased in the article i provided." If they lied, it would be news. Your .edu cite did not state they lied. There is an opioid epidemic but is it disproportionately affecting foster kids? I needed a cite for that. Your cite stated some mental disorders however, it is better to have mental disorders then to be dead. If a group had a certainty of getting all of those things, it would not justify their deaths. As someone who has autism, I am glad and lucky that I wasn't aborted. If my Mom was pro choice, then I might have been aborted because my dad is pro choice. "Don"t just say people naturally toughen up and are stronger because of this when our suicide rate has increased 24%. https://www.cdc.gov...; This has nothing to do with adoption. "if I got injured in an accident should I be not be treated because driving was a risk, even though I had insurance?" You should get treated. If a drunk driver caused the near death of someone and that drunk driver had to sacrifice a kidney to save the victim"s life, they should since they caused the accident through something that was their fault. "How could women continue their education and job if they have complications in their pregnancy such as the ones I named?" Adoption. Health expenses can be covered by insurance. A plan to health insurance money can be found in the following link: (http://www.debate.org...) "Maybe someone might have a higher chance of dying in some cities, but they have the choice of leaving those cities." My point was that women are only slightly more likely to die from birth then from an abortion. They may be 14x more likely, but in reality, the death toll increase is only 1 per 10,000, since death from birth and abortion are extremely rare. You are more likely to die from something as trivial as living in a city. "If someone ran you over drunk driving, they don"t and should not be forced to give you their kidney." Why not? They caused the accident through their own fault. They also should pay for legal expenses. "Them making a mistake does not wave that right, not even for a person." Why not? "A fetus is not a person" They should be since they are human. "I"m just stating that body autonomy is a basic right." What"s a more basic right? The right to life. Without it all other rights are irrelevant. Body autonomy is a supplemental right by comparison. "I never mentioned pro life in all circumstances. I don"t care about what % of pro-lifers vs pro-choicers support abortions at each stage." "My point was that 79% of people (period) support abortion under some cases, be it rape, incest or the mothers life at risk." If you don"t care about how popular an idea is, neither should I and neither should the voters. "The rate of infants born to drugs is a direct result of drugs." Drugs like heroin might have a hereditic addiction. If they are born drug addicts, then they can get rehab. "I already stated that stricter abortions laws do not reduce abortions and that countries with stricter abortion laws typically have higher abortion rates but you choose to decide that that"s not a good comparison." I said it was due to conception control, which should be legal. "Keeping someone in jail for 5 weeks can cost roughly $16k per person, not to mention their legal fees." Then they pay for their jail expenses by labor. It"s hard, but premarital sex is serious. The punishment should also be serious. The work done by prisoners would be up to the prisons to decide, if it"s within reason. "What husband are you referring to that will take the mothers child when she"s in jail or attempts abortion?" I thought they were families but the fact that they are not makes this easier. Then I don"t have to put families in this. "A lot of men convince the woman to abort and pay for the procedure." They shouldn"t do that and abortion being illegal will help prevent them doing this. "Banning abortion does not create a world relatively free from STDs nor abortion nor premarital sex," If you ban abortion, then it will make people more cautious of their sex lives, which not only helps prevent premarital sex, but it also prevents STD spread. "it does not protect a baby from suffering dystopia because fetuses are neither human-beings nor capable of suffering." Science has confirmed that a fetus is a human being with meeting all the necessary chromosomes to be alive and by meeting all the necessary criteria for life. They can"t feel pain, but neither can a sleeping person. Is it okay to kill them? No. Your basically saying, "You don"t know what it"s like to be pregnant" here. However, you also won"t be an aborted fetus. I don"t know what it"s like to be an aborted fetus. The pro life movement stands up for both the mother and the fetus. It allows the mother to choose whether or not to have sex, it allows the fetus to live. I allows the mother to set the kid up for adoption. It gives the mom 2 rights and it gives the fetus 1 right. Sounds like diversity to me, something that I"m assuming you enjoy. THe pro choice movement cares only about the woman, not very diverse in interests. "The amount of money it would take to take care of these children in foster care or on welfare, combined with the legal costs and jail costs of persecuting women could easily go towards free birth control," Both can be provided with the tax plan in the following spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com... Let me know what you think of it in the comment section. "giving foster children a better life" While they are slightly more likely to get certain conditions, a slightly bad life with conditions is better than no life at all. People don"t get killed for having depression. "solving world hunger" There are other ways for poor americans to get food other than welfare.