Mirza is SEXist and is using his religion as a sheild: also The Game

Its late and I probably wont do a good job but I can't stand to leave a debate unrefuted overnight. Mirza has defended such things many times including the wife beating, you don't know if they still follow these systems and you said you don't know everything Mirza has said. Because of these two things you cannot just make assumptions about how he or anyone else follows that religion. My opponent goes on to say that the modesty rules are no different then the rules about women going topless. Lol there are places women can go topless, and I veiw that law as sexist, wrong, immoral, and one that should be banished, unless males are prohibited from walking topless as well. I don't believe any amount of clothing should be dictated by anyone but the individual and if they choose to go naked, I don't see a problem with that. I don't see why people are so afraid of "omg the naked human body! Thats not natural! Seeing that might make my head explode!" seriously the more people try to enforce modesty ad clothing the more it makes people want to go against and have sex, and lust, sneak around, break the rules, see the forbidden etc. I see all laws about clothing to be ridiculas, from the law about wearing boots to bed "It is unlawful to wear your boots to bed." http://travelsoklahoma.net... The burqa ban in France is dumb "France's lower house of parliament overwhelmingly approved a ban on wearing burqa-style Islamic veils Tuesday, part of a determined effort to define and protect French values that has disconcerted many in the country's large Muslim community." http://www.huffingtonpost.com... "indecent exposure laws" are laughable "Indecent exposure is a crime that is defined as exposing one's genitals or socially deemed "private parts" (such as behind or breasts) in a public place where others are present and may witness the act. A person who commits indecent exposure does so intentionally with an understanding that his/her conduct will likely alarm and offend others. Indecent exposure is often performed for the offender's personal sexual excitement or satisfaction, though in some cases it is a form of social rebellion. " http://www.criminal-law-lawyer-source.com... You'd think society will learn the more you criminalize something the more people want it. If being naked wasn't illegal so many people wouldn't want it. There would be far less criminals, and most people would wear clothes anyway if nothing else because it can get cold outside or because religion and society have always taught people to be ashamed of how they look. Moving on away from that rant...I agree that sexism is thinking that one sex is better than another, but also forcing sexes to partake in set gender roles. As a general rule onoe sex is better at...not refuting that, what I'm refuting is that people should not be treated a certain way just because of their genetalia and generalizations. Personally I can tell you how hard it is living in a society that embraces sexism because its "scientific" and if my opponent wishes I will explain how it has personally affected me in the comments. I can identify such things as sexist all too easily because such things have been used against me, and other females. And how too often do males also get made fun of for having "girly" interests? I'd much rather take a math class than a home ec class, I cant survive in home ec and have no interest in it. I don't really like math either but I'm good at it. Not perfect so it doesn't count since I'm a girl, but if I was a guy I'd be considered good at it. My opponent says he thinks everyone should be treated fairly and I agree. " as deserved; justly " http://dictionary.reference.com... "without bias or distortion : impartially " http://www.merriam-webster.com... The whole issue of judging what an individual should do, or how they should be treated based on their sex is unfair. Everyone should be treated as equal until they prove what their capable of and their fortes etc. Maybe a female fits classic gender roles, good for her. Maybe she fits reverse gender roles good for her. Maybe she fits somewhere in the middle good for her. But to judge how she should be treated or talked to based on her gender alone is and of itself sexist. This is something that Mirza personally supports along with his religion thus they are both sexist. I shouldn't have to prove how he is hiding behind his religion, but I will anyway. My opponet himself claims that just because it is in ones religion does not mean they support it. That is enough proof. Mirza is capable of not accepting the sexist part of his religion but instead uses it to cloak his own sexist mindset and using it as a justification. By doing such he is hiding behind it and expecting "its the religion" to take all credit for his sexism, when that clearly isn't fair.