God does not exist

Con himself states that an impossibility is impossible for any entity by saying one cannot make a square circle but he would belive that it is possible to make 0 equal to 1? you can add 0 an infinite number of times and never reach 1 because it is quite simply impossible.That being said in no way shape or form can the first law be violated. If god cannot make a square circle because it is "logically absurd" then he cannot violate the first law of thermodynamics. And again the fact that these kind of limitations exist suggest there is no such thing as an all powerful entity. I did not ignore con when he said that the universe should have already reached thermodynamic equilibrium seeing as it has existed for an infinite amount of time. I went to state that matter and energy are two forms of the same thing like water and ice and may just be the reason the universe hasnt reached thermodynamic equilibrium. It is entirely possible that matter can transform into energy and vise verca which would once again make and unbalanced level of energy. to add to this scientists have discovered that the universe is expanding due to some type of radiation i dont fully understand yet. That being said the universse wlll eventually collapse together into one mass due to the effects of gravity. This could very well be the cycle of our universe to have it collapse together and then explode due to an unbalanced energy which would explain why the universe can not actually be in a state of thermodynamic equilibrium without violating the 2nd law. {{{con The ability to ask a question doesn't mean there is necessarily an answer. For example, I can ask, "How much does the color blue weigh? the color blue does not have a weight seeing as it blue light and light has no mass. There is no question that doesnt have an answer. Just because we do not know the answer doesnt mean there isnt one. {{{{ con There are at least a couple of ways God could cause physical objects to move, even if he is not made of energy. First, God could create energy ex-nihilo at the moment of causation. Second, God could use energy that already exists in the physical world to cause motion. Either way, it is certainly not impossible for an immaterial being to have causal influence in the natural world.}}}}} As shown in the first part of this argument an all poweful entity cannot violate the first law because that woud be "logically absurd" and not a matter of power therfore he cannot create energy. Furthermore to manipulate energy to cause motion would again require mass. Again if god was made up of mass he could not be all powerful due to the limits on matter and seeing as god is supposed to be all powerful this would again provide more proof he does not exist. It also proves he cannot interract with the universse again limiting his power. {{{[con n answer to (2), Pro said that the laws of logic "only exist so long as they are used by man or any other creature." But that is not so. Square circles were impossible even before sentient creatures existed, and the reason is because square circles are violations of the law of non-contradiction.}}} Again the laws of logic do only exist because we are able to use them. WE are the ones who created the shapes and Gave them a specific set of rules. cricles cannot have edges because thats what we decided. squares cannot be rounded again because thats what we wanted. take away all life forms and you have a universe with no definitions therfore no laws of logic apply. {{ con In response to (2), Pro attempted to equate the mind with the brain and argue that they are the same thing. But I have argued that they are not the same thing by noting that the mind has causal influence over the brain. Pro ignored that argument.}} Again i went to prove that the brain and mind are the same thing as when one is infected with parasites or certain diseases people act differently. but according to con this would be impossible seeing as the brain and mind are not the same thing. Just because we can decide what we want to do in certain situations doesnt mean our minds are not the same thing as our brains. again our brain can WEIGH decisions and act according to our memories/experiences the ability to defy our instincts is not proof our brain is not the same thing as our mind/mental state. If i decide to create a fighting game and make a hard bot that is capable of choosing to attack low or high depending on the location of the enemies block does that mean the computer has a mind seperate from its programming? The answer is no the computer reads the situation and chooses its next move base on those circumstances just as our brain is able to defy instincts in certain situatons. {{{con The the mind and the brain do not share every property in common. For example, everything about the physical brain is open to third person observation, but nothing about the mind is open to third person observation.}} The brain is extremely ccomplicated the fact that we do not know what exact chemical reactions mean in terms of the brain doesnt mean the mind is not open to thrid peson observation when it comes down to it it is extremely difficult to understand the brain due to the fact of the infiinte possible reactions/energy levels. {{con one can have a mental perception of a green sweater that is perfectly clear in one's mind when dreaming, but nothing in the brain is green. So the mind and the brain are not the same thing.}}} This statement by the con makes absolutely no sense at all. one can only have dreams about stuff they have seen in their memories after all a blind man cannot dream of green because he has no idea what it looks like. It is not in his memory to picture. our brain is a giant camera that contantly records things whether it is pictures people sweaters or movies. juust becaue the brain isnt green doesnt mean it cant put together a picture of somthig green from our memories. All our knowledge of who we are is recorded in our brains if someone has a brain transplant whos alive the man who needed the transplant or the persons brain??? the answer obviously being the mans brain takes over the body as his brain/mind is a collection of experiences and memories. If someone loses their brain cells and grows new ones (impossible i know but bear with me ) Will the person remembr who he/she is or what they like doing and what they belive in? again the answer being no because they dont have any memories ergo the brain and the mind are the same thing. conclusion con has fail debunk any of my points as a result god doesnt exist :D