God Exists And Is Both Omnipotent And Omnibenevolent

Thank you Con for your response. I regret you find my “proof by verbosity (also called intimidation).” I do not mean to “intimidate.” I try to maintain a moral conduct in my debates. In any event, again, God is the order of the universe, order exists in the universe; therefore, my God exist.In Con's definitions in Round 1, there are no restrictions on the creation or death of God. According to Con the event of the “big bang” is the beginning of the universe. The universe cannot exist without order, which is God, and the handwriting of God are the Laws of Nature; hence, the order of the universe. That is my definition of God. The “big bang” via some “quantum fluctuations” is just an event that solves the dilemma, who created God. If the “big bang” event resulted in order maintaining those “universal constants” a prerequisite for the Laws of Nature; hence, God. Otherwise, let there be another “quantum fluctuation” event, ad infinitum, until the genesis of order, aka, God. http://physics.nist.gov... Con stated, “Metrology's maturity has nothing to do with whether or not the big bang was expressed from quantum fluctuations.”I would like to remind Con metrology is the cornerstone of the scientific method. One cannot obtain empirical data without metrology. Metrology in measuring “cosmic microwaves” is not an issue; however, dealing with the Heisenberg principle making measurements at the quantum level is very difficult. Therefore, in reference to the “big bang” any “quantum fluctuations” is simply theoretical via indirect metrology via “cosmic microwaves.” What are those “quantum fluctuations” are they measurable or just theory? Can Con elaborate on the “uncertainty principle” when measuring at the “quantum” level? Relative to my definition of God, being the order of the universe, perhaps, there are many Gods when one address those theories over “Parallel Universes.” http://www.universetoday.com...Too bad the science of metrology is not mature enough to obtain empirical data from any of those “Parallel Universes” to verify competing theories. One day, we may develop metrology that obtains repeatable observation scientifically verifying those theories, then we discovered order and therefore, God transcends any of those universes. Oh we humans have so much to learn, yet many are so arrogant over what little we have learned. Con pointed out some of God's handwriting, “microwaves,” “law of thermodynamics,” “gravity,” etc., all the Laws of Nature that man has yet observed is my understanding of God, the order of the universe. Without “gravity” not one star could form to create life. Therefore, “gravity” is part of my God and “gravity” is “Omnipotent.” Con made reference to one of God's handwritings dealing with “entropy” via the “2nd law of thermodynamics.” Not to “intimidate” the readers of this debate, to simplify, the “2nd law” deals with the direction of energy flow. That is, heat moves from high temperature to a lower temperature, gas moves from a high pressure to a lower pressure, electricity flows from high resistance to lower resistance. The amazing thing about energy flow via the “2nd law” are the patterns that it generates. For example, a lightning bolt discharging in the atmosphere takes the shape of a treelike structure. Trees are found throughout nature created by the freedom of energy flow, avoiding resistance, morphing into new configurations to improve flow; hence, evolution. Since us humans are a product of evolution, God's handwriting, it is interesting to see our general habits also generate treelike patterns, as in, the structure of our road/highway systems, electrical grids, hierarchy of the internet, etc. We have the tendency to the take the path of least resistance. Population migration also has the tendency to flow from the high resistance of tyranny to the low resistance found in freedom, etc. Even the metaphysical concept of “Natural Law” has its origins from this energy flow: http://www.dogma.lu... In summary, “entropy” creates physical order, life, and governs evolution in biology, physics, technology, and social organization, via the Constructal Law. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...I thank Con for pointing out that life implies “Death” and “Decay.” I thought I made it clear that Unalienable Rights---the animate derivative of the Constructal Law---only applies to living systems. I failed to see why Con can't accept my understanding of God, and the proof of God is simply the order (aka the Laws of Nature) that we empirically observe, and understand, via the scientific method.Perhaps, Con is obsessed with man's written scriptures about God, of which I do not subscribe to, but I do morally respect, and not criticize, the diversity of those of faith. If that is the case, Con being obsessed with such scriptures, he should have put that restriction in Round 1. Since Con place this debate in the “Science” category, I took the opportunity to share with Con, and those reading this debate, my perception of God through the prism of science, a field I been blessed with many opportunities throughout my career. In closing, God (the order of the universe) exist and is both Omnipotent and Omnibenevolent.