BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Ron-Paul's Politics Tournament: Barack Obama

Barack Obama has done positive things in our country and is a good president. Therefore I will point out all the good things he has done.1. From June 30, 2009 to December 18,2011, Barack Obama has withdrawn all the USA troops from Iraq which is bringing an end to one of the longest wars in US history at a time when the American Public are weary of war. This is a very positive thing after spending more than $900 billion and many casualties on and in this war. http://en.wikipedia.org...2. Obama passed the Economic Stimulus Bill Of 2008 which helped preserve jobs in education, law enforcement, and other important jobs that the states could not handle in the middle of the Recession when it was at its worse. The stimulus saved the USA from the worst of the Recession and benefited millions of people. The http://en.wikipedia.org... 3. Obama has shown he can compromise and work with the Republican Party when he agreed to extend the bush tax cuts while also extending unemployment benefits to those who were still struggling to find a job in the aftermath of the recession. He has done well as the peacemaker and I give him lots of credit! He has to face Republicans who want us to cut spending down that there are no education programs for children. He also isn't angry about it at all but instead wants the benefit of socity and has made bills that satisfy the majority of both parties.4. He signed a new START treaty with Russia to reduce the nuclear arsenals of both countries by half, a great and important step in the quest for world peace and also the proliferation of nuclear weapons. 5. Obama also authorized the operations that took out the top figures of Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden and his replacement Atiyah Abd al-Rahman. He personally directed the killing of Osama Bin Laden. George W. Bush said his top mission was to kill Osama Bin Laden. Epic failure. 6. He has supported gay rights and repealed the Don't Ask, Don't Tell so that the gays and lesbials would have more rights (be able to talk about their gender and relationships).http://en.wikipedia.org... I will talk even more about these issues in detail after my opponent has responded and I will even add more issues!!!! Obama is a good president because of what he has done to this country.
Homosexuals who are intolerant of all homophobes are BIGOTS

The term of homophobia has become broadend in today's world, but the actual definition is the one that I have provided which my opponent has dropped the Topicality argument which alone wins me the debate, but I will continue on with the debate for the sake of debate. My opponent's AIDs argument is irrelivant as it is a selective argument and doesn't include the ALL portion of the debate, but if my opponent insists Lesbians have a lower AIDs rate than straight people. [1] Does this case a demonization of straights then since the same way as the gays to straights comparrison? Pro himself answers no in several other debates of his meaning that we have a by definition homophobe who is prejudice without logic.My opponent is incorrect as I have provided effective logic in this debate with well read sources to back my own arguments to show that what I'm saying is true as my opponent has dropped several arguments including the analogy of which my opponent conceded to my stance.My opponent has dropped the following:-Rawls Veil of Ignorance-Topicality-Blacks analogy-My opponent arguing for meWith that I see no other reason, but to vote Con! Thank you.Sources1. (http://www.gmhc.org...)
Homosexuals who are intolerant of all homophobes are BIGOTS

In conclusion, Homosexuals have taken full advantage of the BROAD definition of 'homophobia'. Even if homosexuals can't prove a person is irrationally afraid of gays, homosexuals have pinned the label 'homophobia' on people based on any indication of an aversion/disgust even if it's expressed in the most passive and humble way. People have been labeled 'homophobic' for stating comments that homosexuals simply didn't agree with. Homosexuals use the 'homophobe card' as grounds to be hateful and intolerant towards people who they disagree with on nearly any subject concerning homosexuality. Paris Hilton was labeled a "homophobe" because she mentioned that "most gay men on Grindr probably have AIDS". This was her opinion that had nothing to do with "discrimination" or "prejudice" but since gays disagreed with her, they labeled her a "homophobe" to have grounds to practice bigotry. My opponent is simply not considering the broad definition of homophobia that homosexuals have used as grounds to practice bigotry. My claim is 'Homosexuals who are intolerant of ALL homophobes are BIGOTS'. ALL homophobes include the most passive and humble homophobes who express disgust of gays in the most passive and humble ways. My opponent's entire argument is based on a hasty generalization and a faulty analogy. My opponent is insinuating that 'homophobes deserve to be mistreated and hated because of the way they mistreat gays'. My opponent is insinuating that any person who simply believes that gays are disproportionately infected with HIV deserves to be hated, mistreated and downplayed. My opponent has attempted to persuade readers to side with him by spewing faulty analogies to appeal to emotions by comparing white supremacists to homophobes AGAIN, race and a sexual behavior are completely different. White supremacists are against a group of people regardless of their behavior. Homophobia is fueled by disgust of a specific behavior. I proved that. Con has failed to successfully dispute my argument
Homosexuals who are intolerant of all homophobes are BIGOTS

My opponent starts out by attacking my definition of homophobia, but yet as the pratice of debate here on this debate results in the Instigator in defining all terms. The rest of the terms are left to the opposition to decided. This is the series of debate philosophy and argument known as Topicality. Due to my opponent's inability to properly define homophobia it was my job to do so. Pro then goes and challenges my definition, but results back to vaguness. At this point you have to take my definition over my opponent's as not only is it more specific, but I have fulfilled Topicality in this argument. The second portion of Topicality is that the Judges are to discard all of my opponent's arguments until a full accuate response is made on Topicality and that he agrees to my definition that he has failed to acknowledge.My opponent targets the definitions that I have provided from a noteworthy source and yet attempts to broaden it without a reasonable justification. Again resulting back to the Topicality argument we must officially take my argument over my opponent due to mine being more specific and his definition being way to vague. The ironic part is if you take any of my opponent's arguments and you change it to the scenerio that I provided you get a self-defeating argument as my opponent has fell for the trap. Let's observe this.My opponent's definition of disgust, "Disgust -a feeling of revulsion or profound disapproval aroused by something unpleasant or offensive." Now we can see that its a profound disapproval aroused by something unpleasant. My opponent's response is that Blacks are in tolerant of racism, but if this is the case if I can bridge racism and sexual behavior together then I, once again, win this debate on the grounds of semantics by showing that there is a direct connection of which my opponent has already condemned one of the the argument, that blacks are intolerant of racism thus not bigots, by this if I can show that there is a connection then my opponent concedes the debate by me showing that the resolution can be flipped. Race is defined as, " a class or kind of people unified by shared interests, habits, or characteristics." [1]This is the fact that the individuals that are unified by an interest or habirt. We can see that homosexuality is in fact a race. They are unified by the simple fact that their characteristics of homosexuality in itself unifies them and hence by definition makes them a race. Thus showing a direct connection and since there's a connection my opponent indirectly concedes to another key argument by showing that homophobes are intolerant and are against homosexuals regardless of their personality for the sole fact of their race, that they are homosexual. I extend across my Rawls Veil of Ignorance as it can still be used for the examples that Pro has provided as it's main goal eliminates bais. This argument by my opponent is DROPPED and due to this there is no other choice, but for you to vote Con! Now tell me how these two pictures are different. Sources1. (http://www.merriam-webster.com...)
Homosexuals who are intolerant of all homophobes are BIGOTS

Round 1 Pro states claims Con challenges pro's claims Round 2 Pro disputes con's challenge from round 1 Con defends his or her challenge from round 1 Round 3 Conclusions Rules No new claims in rounds 2 and 3. Bigoted - having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others. Bigot - a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance. Homosexuals treat homophobes with hatred and intolerance simply because they don't agree with our disgust In which is a human emotion. Hating a group of people for being disgusted by a particular behavior is bigotry. Homosexuals are prejudiced against homophobes because homosexuals dont agree with our disgust. It is bigoted and irrational to hate people for being disgusted by having sex with animals. Therefore, it is bigoted and irrational to hate people for being disgusted by having sex with the same sex. Better yet, it is bigoted and irrational to hate people for being disgusted by anything. There's no way around it. Hating people because you don't like the fact that they are disgusted by a particular behavior is in fact bigotry. 1. All homophobes don't discriminate against gays. 2. All homophobes are not prejudiced against gays 3. But all homophobes are disgusted by gays An 'Aversion to' Is a part of the definition of homophobia. Gays constantly use race as a faulty analogy. " Not one study shows racism is rooted in disgust On the other hand, disgust of a particular behavior is not "bigotry". The definition of bigotry is NOT disgust Of a particular behavior. Homophobia rooted in disgust, not fear. (Olatunji et AL 2001) " Disgust - a feeling of revulsion or profound disapproval aroused by something unpleasant or offensive. Defending Disgust: Why Disgust Is Morally Beneficial (Jason A Clark)" http://emotionresearcher.com...; Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour (Valerie Curtis et al 2011)"Published 3 January 2011 doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0117"Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B"12 February 2011"vol. 366no. 1563"389-401 Disgust: the disease-avoidance emotion (Graham C. L. Davey 2011)" Published 31 October 2011 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0039 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 12 December 2011 vol. 366 no. 1583 3453-3465 Homophobia is rooted in unwanted sexual advances (Pirlott, Angela et al 2011)"
The world would be better off without black people

Now Time to Wrap up my arguments as Pro Did not.I talked about how the world would not be better off without black people and refuted Pros' Points, Like George Zimmerman, Slavery, Resources, Crime, Black President, Liberals, The Fake Religion He made Up, and The Cleveland Show. I also presented some arguments of my own, Olympics, Football, Baseball, Prostitutes, And Rock Music. Without black people None of these would exist, or be as popular as it is today. Olympics would be full of swimming competitions, Football would die out, Baseball would be boring without steroids, Prostitutes would die, And Rock Music would not exist. Making the best bands in the world disappear.In my closing statements I decided I will not rebuttal as I think I have already done so in my past arguments and wish pro good luck in the voting session.
The world would be better off without black people

1. CrimeIt does not matter who founded it. The blacks have taken over another good white resturaunt to further destroy our good white culture.2. Black PresidentThat just strengthens my argument. Since, by Con's own concession, EVERY accountant is Jewish, that puts the blame on the Jews for the Great Depression and the recession of 2008.3. LiberalsPfffft. Are you that brainwashed by the black NWO? The blacks voted the liberals in office on purpose. They chose Whites to be their representatives to fool the white people in into accepting the vote.4. The fake religions book.I did not make it up! To test the word of the Toriblean is to test the word of the diamond!5. The Cleveland ShowThat is the dumbest thing I've read all day. BET cannot stand for that because it only airs in America!6. George ZimmermanThis is exactly what I'm talking about. Blacks fall into two categories: Dumb savages, and evil anti white conspirators. Trayvon is obviously in the first. Hitting Zimmerman for looking at him funny? Really?7. SlaveryFine, we'll use Wal-Mart brand. Wal-Mart is owned by Whites and operated by Chinese sweatshop workers.8. ResourcesOh, poor child. What have the blacks done to your mind? The reason white people support it is because the blacks pay off white representatives, through illegal pimp lobbies and votes, to speak out for Obamacare.9. OlympicsLike I said, 2 categories, both of which the world would be better off without.10. AmericaOh gosh, it's worse than I thought. Don't you see? The reason other countries hate America is precisely because of how ignorant and distracted it's citizens are!11. ProstitutesIf you are that politically ignorant, than I am not surprised that the blacks have brainwashed you already.12. Rock MusicIt's fine if you try to change my mind, but using that as the only support for your argument is a fallacy. As for the White People gone missing scenario, that is an irrelevancy fallacy. What would happen if White people were gone is irrelevant in this debate.
The world would be better off without black people

1. CrimeWhen I say "Owner" I have meant Manager. I am sorry for the confusion. And white men MADE Popeye's, so do not try to blame it on the blacks.2. Black PresidentI would not disagree about the Jewish man, I mean EVERY accountant is Jewish. So apparently a Jewish man would do best at managing money.3. LiberalsAnd without the snot nosed white men, black people wouldn't be tricked and therefore vote for him.4. The fake religions' book. Your entire argument is based on a non existent book that you made up.5. The Cleveland show.BET does not stand for that, it stands for Better European Television. Get your facts straight.6. George ZimmermanAnd if it wasn't for the HISPANIC looking at trayvon, then he wouldn't have been shot. And Hispanics are more inferior than the blacks.7. SlaveryAh, but the blacks made Banana Boat sunscreen, so without the blacks that would not work >:{D8. ResourcesBefore you said most of the blacks support the liberals. Now you are saying the "evil liberal obamacare" has a lot of white supporters. You seem to be confused, I would ask you to make up your mind.9. OlympicsFirst you call the blacks stupid, now you are saying they have a "black international New World Order" I find that what you are saying does not add up, and again would like to ask you to make up your mind.10. BaseBallNope, Baseball keeps us busy, and if you took that away we would be more alert. So then other countries would hate that the biggest distraction America had is gone. 11. Prostitutes.That is only based on assumption that prostitution would be legal, and I say we would have to call this one a draw without knowing the law in this alternate reality.12. Rock MusicAre you not the one I am debating against? Why would I not try to change your mind just as well as other people watching this. That is true, but that applies for everything (if it never existed ) So I can say the same for white people. If they never existed, the world would not know what they were missing.
The world would be better off without black people

Ha ha ha. Time to refute your pathetic negro sympathizing arguments.1. CrimeYour source says nothing about hispanics. Also, don't use wikipedia, instead, use the references provided on the page. The owner of KFC is not black! It is KENTUCKY fried chicken, so it's obviously a White redneck. As for Popeyes, the name is just another example of Black stupidity. Any respectable business owner would only name a Spinach business "Popeyes". Popeyes is a disgrace to good old-fashioned white cartoon culture and should be destroyed.2. Black President Of course Obama is black! Just look at the liberal media, the best source for Obama news. THEY agree that he is black. You cannot call him white if you want to, because that's unpatriotic and racist. I disagree about the Jewish man. Hitler killed 6 million Jews, and Germany turned into an economic superpower immediatly after. Coincedence? I think not.3. LiberalsYes, but without the black vote, those snotnose liberals would never take office!4. The ToribleanYour entire argument is based on an Ad Hominem fallacy.5. The Cleveland ShowPffft. Those are all on BET, and we all know that stands for Black Evil Television. Also, only old people watch those shows.6. George ZimmermanAh, but if it weren't for Trayvon Martin walking, he would've never been shot. The blame lays on both of them, but because Blacks are inferior, the blame lays on Trayvon.7. Slavery.No. All we need is Banana Boat sunscreen to take care of that problem.8. ResourcesOf course all black people have diabities, but have you ever stopped and wondered why? It's because it is a genetically engineered disease invented by Whites to wipe out the blacks. Plus, with the evil liberal Obamacare, which has many White supporters, more people than ever will be going to the doctor, and we will have a doctor shortage, not a surplus. 9. OlympicsNo, the only reason tax dollars are spent on it is because the evil black international New World Order conspiracy is trying to tax whites to extinction. Well, that won't happen today. After this debate, we will exterminate the blacks, and the Olympics will be no more!10. BaseballThe world would be better off! Who watches baseball anyway? Since everyone hates America, and Baseballs America's favorite pasttime, that means everyone would love it if Baseball was gone!11. ProstitutesNobody would kill prostitutes because prostitution wouldn't be illegal. Here's why. The reason it's still illegal is because the black Pimps secretly lobby millions of dollars because they know that if prostitution is legal then the b*tches won't need anyone to protect them, and the Pimps would be out of business. 12. Rock MusicAd Hominem attack. Plus, if Rock Music never existed, I would not know what I am missing.
The world would be better off without black people

BTW, these aren't actually my opinions. This is just a troll debate. Seriously, don't get pissed off. New Arguments:1. CrimeBlack on black crime wouldn't exist without black people, and neither would the ghetto. Since black people are the ones put in prison the most, it follows that if they didn't exist crime would drop.2. Black PresidentThe president ran up our debt because black people can't handle money!3. LiberalsStatistically speaking, black people are more likely to be liberal douches.4. The ToribleanThe Toriblean states that all black's are inferior sinners who will never bathe in the light of the Giant Diamond. They are sinners, followers of the Giant Talc, and must be dealt with.5. The Cleveland ShowIf black people didn't exist, their would not be a market for this atrocity.=======================================================================================Rebuttals1. George ZimmermanIf it weren't for the black thug, Zimmerman would have never been on trial, and state resources wouldn'thave been wasted trying to get justice for the inferior race.2. SlaveryPfffffft. If blacks weren't here, then the next race up would take their place, and immigrants would be welcomed! One less thing for Congress to worry about.3. ResourcesWhat YOU do not realize is that it is not the consumption of one black individiual, but how many of them their are that is important. One black person does not consume very much, but they breed like rodents. You leave one black man and 5 black women and you'll have 5 kids who will each have 5 illegitimate children of their own by the time their 21!4. OlympicsThe olympics are still boring. Black people just give it an excuse to exist. The Olympics are a perfect example of good White tax dollars wasted on black people.5. Football.Ah, but without black people, we would have less money wasted on pointless sports and more money for soldiers for hte common good of the world, because they are the world police.6. BaseballBaseball is still boring! If we take out black people, it will cease to be profitable and die out, freeing up a hundred cable channels!7. ProstitutesWe would have free agent prostitutes. They would be cheaper because they are self employeed and give no cut to anyone. Also, AIDS wouldn't exist if black people were gone.8. Rock MusicPffft. If black people never existed, rap would be gone as well. I consider that a fair trade.
The world would be better off without black people

1. George ZimmermanIf it weren't for that Mexican guy, trayvon wouldn't have been dead.2. SlaveryIf it weren't for black people the Glorious, Perfect Idea which is slavery would not have come to mind! 3. Resources What you do not realize is that the black people barely use ANY resources, Just give them some watermelon, kool-aid packets, and some chicken. Just throw it at them, you don't even need to make any of it! they'll make it themselves! 4. Olympics Without black people the Olympics would be really boring. (except swimming) 5. Football Face it, it's made up of black people. Quarterbacks are only the real white people in football. Without black people there would be no one to catch the ball.6. Baseball Without the Black people then no one would be able to give them steroids and then it would be SSSOOOO much more boring. 7. Prostitutes No pimps, no prostitutes.8. Rock Music Elvis made rock music popular, but the black people MADE it. Without black people ALL your favorite bands might not be here anymore.Just a few more arguments to yours. They don't really need to much explaining, next round i hope there will be more points to argue.
The world would be better off without black people

Let's begin1. George ZimmermanIf it weren't for that black kid, Zimmerman would not have been on trial, and the news would've been focused on more important things! Also, all of those riots wouldn't have happened because they were 90% black anyway, and they wouldn't have had anything to riot about.2. SlaveryIf it weren't for black people, slavery wouldn't have existed. Slavery cannot exist without the slaves.3. ResourcesBlack people make a huge portion of the world population. If all black people died, most poverty would be gone, and their would be more resources to share for all.