Biblical creationism has been debunked by modern science

Accepted. I thank you for presenting a great topic for debate. The debate of Evolution vs. Creation is a tough one for either side to debate. How does one prove or disprove the other? While my opponent has provided a very valid thesis upon which to debate, they provide only the most broad assertions where proof is concerned. What evidence disproves creationism? My assertion is that Evolution and Creationism are not mutually exclusive. The Bible makes no assertion to the actual mechanics of HOW life evolved. Conversely, Evolution says nothing regarding the beginnings of life. However, the proponents of either theory make the logical fallacy of not acknowledging the other theory has merit as well. Evolution exists. It's both a scientific fact and a common sense concept. At its very basic level, evolution is survival of the fittest and for an organism to survive, it must evolve to it's environment. It's one of the more "duh" concepts in science. But where did that impetus for life begin? Creationism provides that missing link. I proscribe to the idea of intelligent design. In other words, evolution exists, but is guided by a hand other than pure, random chance. Let's take a look at the Bible's depiction of the dawn of man and the universe. The creation of the universe is pretty much covered in Genesis chapter 1. The creation of man is in Chapter 2. One of the strongest arguments for intelligent design is the flow of those six days. The progression of one event after another. It follows, almost perfectly, the evolutionary cycle of science. Granted, there's a little mix up with the fourth day, but the progression is still uncanny. Consider the time in which the Bible was authored. For all of my faith, I can still view this objectively. These were uneducated, by our standards at least, superstitious men. Evolution was unknown, and unthinkable. God was the beginning and end of everything. Why did they write the segregation of days? Why not simply say "Poof! and then there was the earth!"? How did they know the order of which things came? Here we see science and the Bible marching in almost lock step. One of the more solid arguments I've heard from proponents of Evolution is the timeline as to the age of the universe. They argue approximately 15 billion years, while the Bible argues 6 days, 7 counting the Sabbath. However, Dr. Gerald Schroeder offers an interesting insight. Time is not constant. That is a scientific fact. It's affected by velocity and gravity. Consider the Evolution/Big Bang Theory. This theory contends that the whole of the universe was compressed into a microscopic space. From this space, an uncountable number of stars were born. Imagine the type of gravitational forces existent in that microscopic space. Imagine the flow of time as the universe expanded. Imagine as it expanded, the gravitational forces disbursed and its effects disbursed. While I'm not arguing that Creationism explains everything, I am contending the original thesis that Creationism has been debunked. I contend that it hasn't. I contend that Evolution and Creation are not mutually exclusive. I eagerly await your reply.