Parental control on sns or other social networking should be banned

Children might not know well about safety2) Children might get themselves into serious trouble due to not knowing wellC) Parents should monitor their child’s internet usage by way of parental control to help the child avoid getting into serious troubleI think that parents allowing their children to use social networks are the examples of the independence that the children got. That means that the parents got to think that the children are independent and smart enough to go in the cyber society. Also, that shows that the parents believe the children. SO, the parents who monitor their children's internet usage is not giving the independence to the children, and they limit the children's acts in the society. Also, the parents who monitor their children carefully make the children dependent to parents and cannot not gain much confidence. The fact that the children are allowed freely in cyber society may give confidence to the children that they can stand by oneself in the society. Being dependent is really a serious problem. Later, when the children go out to the society, it would get to be disadvantage and critical conflict. Parental controls do not prevent the children from serious problem. Instead, it may cause serious problems. In addition, my opponent said that parental control may block the serious trouble. However, the parental control is not the right way to prevent and make the children safe. If the parents just limit the social networking of the children, the children would be just angry. Much the children would fight with their parents, make other ways to do social networkings like buying other device or making another account secretly. It is important for the children to really understand the serious problems that might happen in the social networks. They should be educated and taught more and more about it. Also the parents who control their children are problems too. Parents should not have absolute power on their children. The children has their basic rights which include freedom of fear, freedom of choice, and freedom of rights. The choice of the children needs to be respected. Most of the children do not want parental controls, and not having parental controls should be one right that should be kept. Or else, it may cause serious problems that the children gets no right to express their opinion. It is entirely possible that both access to social media and parental controls can be in effect simultaneously.~ However, if parental controls are in action, access to social media will be hard. Parental controls mean that the parents can see what the children thinks and had written in the sns. So, naturally, the children would need to think about their mother and father. That would not allow the children to express their opinions freely. I think the risk of hurting the relationship between parent and child should be weighted far less than the risks of, say identity fraud or malicious paedophiles, the latter two very likely having serious consequences. Parental control would help significantly lower the risk of the latter two. ~ Privacy problems and relationship problems are also really crucial. In some social networks, when there is parental control, the parents get to be able to see what their children wrote, as well as what their children's friends had written. The friends would not want their profiles and writings to be shown to other friend's parents, even whom they don't know. That is a crucial problem that affects even other friends. Also, relationship problem should be considered. Actually, there was an event that the children killed their parents because of too much control and bad relationship. This conflict might bring out the consequence of killing.To conclude, parental control may bring out more problems to the children. However, there are such problems that might come out by independence, but that can be solved by other ways than parental control like giving well-provided education.