Death Penalty

0) I'm going to repeat the argument on the other debate so it is kindof a refresher. 1) Send me the link and I probably can view and analyze them. 2) There is a difference between murder and execution. 3) Given that prison experience for murderers is better then life for many poor people, my analogy is kind of consistent. Perks of being a prisioner: -They get 3 meals a day. If they don't like the food, then they often make their own. -This kindof goes with the one above. They get to participate in the Ramen trade(https://www.npr.org......) -Clean clothes -Getting paid for stuff http://dailycaller.com...... https://www.thrillist.com...... https://www.huffingtonpost.com...... Since murderers are getting these perks that they wouldn't get if they were poor, they kind of are getting paid to be a murderer. This should not be the case. Good things should get rewarded proportionally and bad things should get punished proportionally. Prisoners are in jail because they are accused of doing bad things and the murderers should get punished with death, not rewarded with prison. 4) Murderers tend to be people who didn't do very well in school. Lectures aren't effective for people who didn't do well in school. Besides, murderers would tend to ignore anything that's being preached. If you went into a room that wasn't a church but had a lot of Christians in it and you start ranting about how much you hate god, they will probably ignore you since they disagree with what your saying. Since murderers probably believe killing people is okay, it's fine to believe that if it just stays as a belief, but when you kill someone else on the basis of that belief, just don't be surprised when the law does it to you. 5)I am not welcoming violence. I am punishing it with violence directed against the murderer instead of violence perpetrated against the murderer. 6)Not all types of killing are wrong. Is the military wrong? No. If the US withdrew it's military, then more innocent people would die from the power that fills the vacuum left behind by the US. 7)The bible supports eye for an eye for justice purposes. Any time it tells you to turn the other cheek, this is because there is a difference between being a vigilantic and being an executioner. A vigilantic does not have the authority to execute, an executioner does. The bible allows the executioner to execute, since he does not have as much stored hatred inside of him. A vigilantic is more likely to kill an innocent person. If my brother was murdered by someone I have never seen, I may sort through it all on my own, but whoever I think is the suspect, I probably will be wrong. The law on the other hand, gets the answer right much more often because of the following: a) They have tools that I wouldn't have, like DNA testers, the storage of many people's DNA b) They are professionals in their field, so they have more experience then a victim like myself. Because of that, vigilantic people tend to not be the ones who carry out executions, whereas equipped, experienced officials are. 8)It's not the victim's relatives taking the revenge, it's the justice system that performs the punishment. The judge does not harbor as much emotion as the victims. I can also make a case that anti-death penalty people use emotion themselves since they care about the murderer. 9) In order to reduce murder, executions ideally should fill the void. 10) Actually, while South Africa has a homicide rate and Japan has a low homicide rate, South Africa abolished the death penalty while the death penalty is active in Japan (https://en.wikipedia.org......). 11)Only 4.1% of convicts for murder are actually innocent. (This is religious) If your executed innocent, since atheist criminals tend to convert out of fear of hell, once they get executed innocently, they would go to heaven. Even if your secular, the innocent inmates would probably be thinking hopeful thoughts at the deathbed. http://www.newsweek.com............ 12) Read #11 13 If I drove my judgment on the sole basis of anger, then I would be wanting them burned alive for killing one person with a gunshot. If someone murdered one person with a gunshot, then I want the murderer to get killed by gunshot. 14) Nice job. I am as well. 15)The government within the United States, if they support the death penalty they almost always want it for murderers because the murderer morally should experience the pain they inflicted on their victim. The government only does it because someone has to kill them, the victim is dead, the victim can't kill anyone. Punishing doesn't lessen any violence into this world that's why I believe restorative justice and rehabilitation is better to focus on. 16)It is not the only punishment that can deter but it is the most moral and effective punishment for prisoners. P.S. How do you bold things?