Whether ISIS could (beyond reasonable doubt) march to Rome and "dethrone" the Pope.

CON provided me enough wiggle room with his definitions and rules to make the following arguments:1) ISIS may dethrone the current pope through assassination (either in Rome or when the Pope is traveling aboard).2) ISIS may "march" to Rome with clandestine soldiers and embedded sleeper cells or with Muslim protesters (no need to conqueror NATO countries).3) ISIS may acquire a WMD and use it against the Vatican.4) ISIS could possibly acquire a large coalition of Muslim nation allies and supporters who could potentially declare Jihad ageist Catholicism.5) Allah himself may dethrone the Pope (pending if Allah exists).6) ISIS may dethrone the Papacy through subversionTactical Points of Consideration within Pro's Terms and Conditions.POINT #1 That ISIS may dethrone the Pope through assassination works as CON has limited his definition of the papacy to only the current Pope:"Pope- The leading figure in Catholicism (located in the Vatican city)."Dethroning of the Pope is thus possible upon the immediate death of Pope Francis. Removal of the office of Pontifex Maximus from the Catholic Church is thus NOT a necessary precondition in order to meet CON's rules and definitions. (I do however expect CON to cry foul on this point, so just in case, I have provided addiontional arguments that do infact ensure that no other Pope could succeed Pope Francis; however I have no intention of ever dropping this argument). +dethrone- to physically remove from any position of power or authority.+Pope-The leading figure in Catholicism (located in the Vatican city)." =death or removal of only the current Pope.Assassination of the current Pope is thus more than possible for ISIS by using any kind of organized terrorist raid on the Vatican or any kind of lone-wolf / "run & gun" / RPG / sniper / or IED tactics at a papal rally. POINT#2 CON has provided no definition for "march" and has never expressed a necessary precondition that ISIS must physically capture the city of Rome. We thus have no choice but to assume the normal english dictionary's definition of "march" which is three fold:1)to walk with regular and measured tread, as soldiers on parade; advance in step in an organized body.2.to walk in a stately, deliberate manner.3)to go forward; advance; proceed: Source:http://dictionary.reference.com...Thus ISIS may "march" to Rome successfully simply by using embedded European sleeper cells or celestine agents. They could also meet the walking defition of a "march" by simply parading around the city while waving there ISIS flags or hilariously walking in step.More realistically however, it is possible with enough Muslim and political support for ISIS to stage and sponsor a large muslim protest on the Vatican (or Rome). Simply desecrating the image of Muhammad and blaming it on the Catholics through propaganda statements should suffice. ISIS will thus meet the definition of a "march on Rome." POINT #3 Should ISIS acquire a WMD (especially of a nuclear grade) then they could potentially change the balance of power for all countries in the world. A clandestine nuclear attack on the Vatican would not only dethrone the current Pope, but could also kill off the college of cardinals as well. With no one left to succeed the Pope; and the Catholic Church in complete shock/chaos from nuclear attacj; the Office of Pontifex Maximus could potetinally fall into ruin.We can also believe ISIS could potentially acquire a nuclear weapon due to the career success of AQ Khan (http://en.wikipedia.org...). A muslim scientist who was able to give atomic secrets to Pakistan and N. Korea and used to run a syndicated underground (blackmarket) nuclear network. If AQ Khan could do it, then ISIS could to.POINT #4 That ISIS could possibly find itself infront of a large coalition of muslim nation allies and supporters works should political /cultural circumstances rapidly change in the muslim world. This is entirely possible due to middle east instability, ongoing civil wars, and Arab revolutions. The Arab Spring provides an intellectual blueprint for what this might look like - and should something like this occur where a middle east revolution has ISIS leading a coalition of Muslim nations, they could realistically have the military power to engage in conventional military operations against NATO or the Vatican. There Jihad might not succeed outright, but they will still have the military capability at least to dethrone the Pope and end the papacy.POINT #5 That Allah himself may dethrone the Pope works -without a doubt- if Allah exists. This point does appear silly but it is included because it does meet CON's challenge & rules and is a method that could "without a doubt" succeed. Again, this only works if Allah exists, however, CON cannot prove that he does not.POINT #6 That ISIS may dethrone the papacy through subversion works if ISIS is able to infiltrate the college of cardinals -and with bribery, arm-twisting, or hostage taking- elect one of there own supporters secretly to the Office of Pontifex Maximus. We can believe that this method is possible due to papal politics and the historical machiavellian trend of state and non-state actors influencing the papacy and college of cardinals since the early Renaissance. I believe that I have proved that it is perfectly logical to assume that ISIS could realistically "without a doubt" dethrone the current Pope or remove the Office of Pontifex Maximus from the Catholic Church by using these tactics . Now over to CON.