The Jehovah's Witness view on death and resurrection is false.

I have one further request to make of those who vote on my argumentation. Pleas judge on my spelling as English, not American. There are numerous differences. I have to admit I find that a fascinating series of thoughts, and a lot hinges on what you consider to be you in reality. When Jesus was born he was a perfect human child, because all imperfection, which we inherit from Adam, were removed at conception. However he was still "just" Jesus, he was not at that point the Christ, nor did he have the personality or memories of God's son. If you really stop to think about it you will see who obvious this is or should be. That is because our personality grows with our experiences and memories so unless he was given all of the personality, and therefore all the memories of God's son he would not be God's son at all. Would an immature human mind be able to hold all information, all those millennia of experiences? Not a chance. Thus it was only on his Baptism, when he formally and publicly accepted his role that the Personality and memories of God's son were transferred to his human body. The principle is exactly the same for the resurrection. You do have a very valid point in that God could, if he wished, create more than one of each of us, but at the instant of creation each one would most definitely be the same person because they would have everything that makes them a person, and individual. However as they had different experiences they would cease to be the same person, just as we change continually, if only in minute increments, with every new experience. It is very true that in the resurrection that we will not have the same body, but we will have everything that makes us, us. There is nothing else, other than our personality and our memories, that makes us what we are. Precisely the same would happen if we were cloned. At the instant of cloning we would both be "us" but that would change as soon as we started having different experiences however slight the difference. In a very real sense the you that you are now, is not the you that you will be tomorrow, or the day after, or the day after that. The differences may be so slight that you don't notice them, though others may, but they will be there none the less. Interestingly what others recognise as us is only the physical shell, it is not us, it is what contains us. That was illustrated by Jesus resurrection. He did not come back in the same body, and not even it seems in a human body. Even Mary didn't recognise him in the Garden and the two disciples he spoke with on the road to Emmaus only recognised him after when they thought about his conversation and his mannerisms. The fact that he was able, twice, to appear in the middle of crowded and locked rooms apparently out of thin air, tends to indicate that it was a spirit body that he could materialise and dematerialise at will. It even appears that he could make the wounds form the nails appear at will. However for all that he was still Christ, still the person that his followers knew and loved. Thus it will be in the resurrection. We will have new, perfect bodies, but we will still be "us" in every way that matters, and still be changing day by day, even minute by minute, as we do now. That is why the resurrection of us, as we are at the moment of death is not only possible, but inevitable. However it has to be admitted that if I were to die tomorrow, the "me" that was resurrected would be the me that existed tomorrow, not the one that exists as I type this argumentation. It is also true that the "me" who is resurrected will not be the same as the me that is there the next hour the next day, the next week. God cannot do more than that, nor should he.