Science v. Politics

America's Political System has kept order in this country since it was first established. Science on the other hand is mainly purposed for research and inventions on improving our technology and how we live our daily lives. These advancements however contribute no factor at all in the running of this country and would lose control of the community if put into power. Most of my argument lies within what you have previously stated so I will instantly delve into the problem.#1 CapitalismYou've stated that multiple of produce factories have thrown their own goods out and have starved millions but this in no way deals with politics. We live in a Capitalist country, meaning all businesses can be privately owned and the politicians and governmental system of America has no power of regulating what factories throw out unless it is a hazardous waste to the environment and to the public. Politics has nothing to do with this, so your argument about poverty is invalid as well as your statement in Exhibit B. You've stated that I would be wrong to assume the waste of products is not tied to the government, but it isn't. If they did control all factories and how they waste their own product, this country would be more of a communism than an actual Capitalist country.#2 Technology"The reason for this among other things was the rapidly advancing technologies in agriculture. Food production was now far easier and far faster and required fractions of the labor as in previous generations." Isn't it Science's job to make advanced technology to increase rate of production and not Politics? You've basically just stated that Science is the reason of excess crops being thrown out by farmers due to unfair prices. Politicians have no affiliation with the creation of technological advancements, but Science however is the one who is.#3 'Profit at any cost'To start off, your whole argument about the Federal Reserve is wrong, it is a private owned business and is not affiliated with the government. You seem to be forgetting that we live in Capitalist America and not Communist Russia, and with the unfair prices, we don't have an unlimited amount of money. If you think "Then why can't the government print more money?", then the net worth of an American Dollar will go down due to the increasing amount of it. Resources aren't limitless either so we do have to increase prices on these due to scarcity. Your argument about Fraud also said literally nothing other than that Federal Protection Agencies and Oversight Committees are controlled by the government, of course they are.In conclusion, the majority of your argument is both opinionated, false, and hypocritical. Technological advancements are made by Science so you've stated that Science is whats making farming harder for the agricultural population due to excess crops. You've failed to understand that America is a Capitalist country and private owned businesses cannot be regulated by the government due to our current system; And the Federal Reserve is also privately owned. Science is also in no way possible linked to running a country, paying off our debt, keeping the public stable, and choosing who's leader (which would also lead back to our governmental system so if for some improbable reason we did switch to Science, choosing a leader is a part of political events). I suggest you do more research before starting debates on two systems that in no way are alike.