A pink invisible unicorn is both pink and invisible.

Allow me to begin by saying "Thanks!" for choosing my topic for your debate enjoyment, that goes to my opponent, as well as the audience reading these words. Also, could you source some of the stuff you use please? I will now begin by rebutting my opponent's claims. "I. There is no evidence for pink invisible unicorns existing." The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. Simply speaking, just because there is no evidence of a pink invisible unicorn, does not mean there is not a pink invisible unicorn. But considering you probably won't except that, I will argue that the Pink Invisible (or invisible pink) unicorn is the goddess of my religion, the IPU [1], and will thus argue using the Kalam cosmological argument [2]: 1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause I claim this "cause" as a Pink Invisible Unicorn. So first we must note that their is nothing before the beginning of the universe, it cannot be explained scientifically, as this would imply the existence of antecedent determining conditions. Because of this, it follows that the cause must be uncaused and personal (Personal in order to create in the lack of antecedent determining conditions). It must also transcend both matter and time in order to create both matter and time. It must also be changeless, since there was no time prior to the creation of the universe. Now if you ask, "wouldn't the unicorn also need a creator?" note the first premise that "whatever begins to exist has a cause". The IPU was always in existence, according to my beliefs, and therefore has no cause, for it was always in existence. Although I find this argument valid, I ask that you just drop this contention, cause it's not fun to argue, and were just getting off topic of what's really fun. Though, this is just a suggestion. You can do what you want. "II. The concept of a pink invisible unicorn is contradictory. To be pink, a thing must be visibly pink. To be invisible, a thing must not be visible at all. This is a contradiction in terms, which makes the existence of pink invisible unicorns impossible." I have a number of theories that would yield the result of a unicorn which is both pink and invisible at the same time, they are as follows: ======================== 1. An invisible unicorn, painted pink. ======================== Consider the following, a unicorn that is invisible is captured using heat vision technology. The captors then decided to coat the invisible unicorn using paint. Though the unicorn is invisible, she is now covered in paint that is of a pink nature. Even though her invisibility cannot be seen, as it is covered with paint, her invisible nature is still in existence. At that present time, the unicorn is both pink and invisible. Here's an analogy to better understand this argument. If one were to coat a white wall with red paint, both the wall and the paint would have different frequencies of color from the visible color spectrum that we as humans have the ability to see, the paint as red, and the wall as white, though the white cannot be seen, it is till there under the red, and if it were seen, would be the frequency of a visible white color. =========================== 2. The Invisibility Cloak (ï¿½ la Harry Potter) =========================== A pink unicorn creates an invisibility cloak, for she is Goddess, and begin to wear it. She is then seen as pink under the cloak, as well as seen as invisible. She is both pink and invisible. ============ 3. The Blind Man ============ The unicorn is in the eye of the beholder. If a blind man were to come across a pink unicorn, he would not see it, because he is blind. Now, though he is blind and incapable by nature of being able to see, he cannot see the unicorn's pinkness. Thus, to the blind man, the pink unicorn is invisible. I look forward to your arguments and hope you and the audience have awesome fun. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org...