We should cut all funding to NASA

Thanks to con for his participation, and refraining from ad hominem, and any negativity. I hope he no longer looks at the flat earth theory as ignorance anymore. I will address his arguments from round 3. "since they're travelling outer space in search of alien life, and who wouldn't want to..." That is the point of this debate. NASA is not going toutero space, because there is no such thing as outer space. NASA is only getting paid to feed us CGI drawings and oil paintings. Impenetrable dome, remember? glass ceiling? Sky's the limit? "Besides, what would NASA gain ..." How's about a trillion dollars so far, adjusting for inflation? Throw in a rock star status with a decent living writing and signing books, and you have a good life just for keeping a secret. " I might've missed something, but we'll see." Maybe my opponents sees the link now? "Sure, it might've been a little longer than a few minutes. So did we actually see Colorado..." Nobody said anything about Colorado. I will continue as if my opponent did not make this mistake. Who said we can't see Chicago anymore? People from the area see it all the time, weather permitting. Joshua Nowicki takes photos of Chicago from Michigan all the time.(1) The time lapse is an entire days time. What sort of illusion is my opponent proposing? Since my he offers no alternative, it stands that the earth is flat. "Einstien admits the Earth is the one revolving." Einstein said this as to not go completely against his benefactors and peers in the science community. This was said well before any astronots "explored space". I ask again how did we figure out the earth is moving, if we can't measure it's movements? And Einstiewn said "any optical experiment"... Please show me how I can see this "movement" from space. We effectively took a few people's word for it. Heresay. Also, 1,000 mph is hardly slow, the speed of sound is slower than this. Why can I hear the person east of me as good as the person west of me? Where is the sonic boom? Astronauts Some of them did agree to an interview. Only one would swear on a bible that he walked on the moon, and he was very nervous if you'll see his body language. " I still think they would sue NASA for lying." Why would they sue the people that made them rich legends? "Yes, the game boy was released..." I'm talking about the technology involved being far superior to what existed in the 60's. We have the equivalent to 1,000 game boys in our pockets everyday. Governments a far bigger budget than Nintendo. It is nonsensical to say that the technology available to NASA today would not be sufficient to get civilians to space, which has not happened. "..So God's the puppet master. Show me that he wanted NASA to hide everything." No, the opponent does not understand the point. Satan and his fallen angels are the puppet masters, they want NASA to hide everything. Without the ball, there would be no evolution, without evolution, there would be no atheism. Maybe our voters can have some critical thinking about themselves, and put this puzzle together as most flat earthers have. The Rocket "Abrupt stop; Ah. It actually went to space. The abrupt stop was when it was at space. It didn't quite escape Earth's gravity, I think." So, did it go to space or not? Did it leave earth's gravitational pull? or not. NASA must turn it's rockets to reach escape velocity (so they say) yet the rocket went straight up. It's clear my opponent has no other valid explanation, simply guessing, while contradicting himself. It stands that the rocket hit the dome. " Water Sound; I did hear the sound. Sadly, I can't explain what it is..." I have, and my opponent has not alternatively explain this either. "light shines on the water. We can't actually see the water dome." This is why, at day, the dome is blue, and at night, we can see through it. Two suns have been spotted around the world. Rainbows are reflected off the dome, as are sun dogs. My source video (9) explains this. "The Moon; I swear I clicked source #7. Are you reffering..." It is the moon, it is the only visible object in the sky. Look at it on a 42" TV, not a cellphone. The team even confirms it is. As far as the distance, Reffi investigated the matter, and found out that it was over Australia, supposedly on the opposite side of the whirled from Nevada, where the launch was performed. As for it's size, if it was actually 250,000 miles away, as NASA claims it is, a few miles "closer" or "away" would make no huge distance in size as in this case. Truthfully, the moon is much closer and smaller, yet past the dome, unreachable. https://youtu.be... "I thought it was a water dome. So is the dome water, glass, or something God created?" I've never been there before, so I can't say, it's a mystery for sure. It could be glass or a crystal like sapphire, as told in the Bible, with water beyond. Either way it's inpenetrable. In the Gulf of Mexico, underground lakes and rivers can be found that have a density so high, submarines bounce from the surface. " The moon has become irrelevant, as I've seen the rocket took off during day." False, the wave that is caught occasionally going over the moon is proof of water in front of it, if no alternative explanation, this evidence stands. You saw a rocket take off, turn a 90 degree angle, and go out of site, probably landing in a body of water, like the Bermuda Triangle. In early launches, they bounced off the firmament, and added carbon fiber reinforcement to prevent any damage from "skimming" the surface. The reason "Ah, money! Should've known! But hang on... why are you mentioning Disney?" And to hide God. Disney is a graphics animator, this is where the "pictures" come from that NASA supplies. They make hints at this throughout in the form of Easter eggs. Case in point. Disney just bought the rights to Star Wars, Han Solo shows up on mercury, frozen in Mercury... http://www.foxnews.com... Mickey Mouse was found in several places on the moon. http://www.funnyordie.com... And Pluto looks like... well.. Pluto. http://time.com... Anyone dealing with computer animation can tell that NASA is creating these pictures on a computer. " Okay... what dome did they find? I couldn't find anything." We have to read between the lines, and use common sense to assume that Admiral Byrd didn't take "4,700 men, 13 ships, and 33 aircraft" to set up an Antarctic base, as they claim. Why then, did they call it project "highjump"? "I am NOT reading the entire thing ..." Again, the government is not going to outright tell us the real purpose of this mission. But the name says it all. "This goes unsourced. I think Pro is trying to use Disney as some sort of emotional ..." While Walt was never officially a freemason, or this record has been destroyed, we can see he was in DeMolay, a sort of precursor to Freemasonry. https://demolay.org... http://parablesblog.blogspot.com... " Also, might I add source #14 is "The Coincidence theorist"? This is one big "Illuminatti confirmed" ..." The source gives a direct link from NASA, and shows that the word sex is written on most dictionaries now, how does this not prove anything? "Pizza Planet is irrelevant..." It's called predictive programming, hints, and all around (for anyone with half a brain cell) "here is some proof" from the creator, perhaps a guilty conscious. " But NASA is not MKUltra. This is irrelevant." Not according to the author of this book. Who claims to have been one of their victims. http://www.abovetopsecret.com... In conlusion, it is clear that NASA is lying, and has never been to "space". The dome blocks.