Noah's Ark

The Con has brought up arguments in Round 4 that have nothing to do with the subject at hand, so for those I will not argue my point because I have no need to." Case 1: The Cross-breeding Fallacy!Many people think you can cross-breed two breeds of dogs and get every single breed through cross breeding. However, I would like to show this isn't true. Lets just say I cross bred a husky with a collie. I wouldn't get all the types of dogs through cross-breeding. I would only get the mix of the collie and husky. Evolution takes millions of years to happen. (1) If dogs did cross breed to get every breed we know today, then how did they do it so fast? In the link used commonly by creationist, it states that the flood happened 4,359 years ago." Calculated BC date for creation: 4004 Calculated AM date for the Flood: - 1656 Calculated BC date for the Flood: 2348 Current Year (minus one2): + 2011 Number of years since beginning of Flood: 4359 "My challenge for you is to find me a link that states what two breeds cross bred into all the breeds of dogs and if it would take less than or just exactly 4,359 years. Good luck!The Con goes on to argue here that two breeds of dog could not breed in order to bring about the thousands of breeds of dogs we have today, in such a short amount of time. For one, I did not say all dogs came from just two breeds of dogs.You could get the breeds of dogs we have today just from the 1600's, for the Spaniards and English and German cross-breeded the dogs so many times and so well-- hundreds of the breeds we have today just come from the past 500 years. Another thing, that I should add, just because I believe in Noah's ark, gives the Con no reason to just assume that I am a Young Earth Creationist. "Case 2: Morality"He wants me to argue this, then the Con better challenge me to a different debate, because I believe that he has settled with arguing things off topic because he already knows he has lost."1. Pro says people that follow god will be sustained. However, why doesn't he sustain priests and nuns? What links shows that the first humans were in better health than we are right now with modern medicine.I did not say that all who simply folllow God will be sustained for a long healthy life. The rain falls upon the just and the unjust. So I want you to give me some kind of link that priests and nuns are really as close to God as you think they are."So, one kind of elephant grew to evolved to every kind of elephant in a little more than four thousand years? Nope."Did I say one kind of elephant?Find in my arguments where I literally said, ONE kind of each animal. "3. Supposedly, almost all the water sunk into the ground. However, this never happens in normal Earth! I wish that would happen when I want to play basketball with my friends."Once again, I wish the Con would read my arguments fully and more than once so he gets a full understanding of what I'm saying. I did not say that almost all the water sunk into the ground.The Con complains that my links were mostly "biased", which however I think the audience can agree that any links are better than the ones that he has provided before round 4 (zero).The rest of his supposed rebuttals go off of the assumptions that I believe in Young Earth Creationism.The arguments you make are based nearly all from assumptions. Please don't do this again. :-)I have not used links in this round because the whole debate. all I have done is made rebuttals against the Con's arguments. That is fine with me. As he stated, "This forces you to vote Con!Good luck!"Was he talking to himself?