Tests/projects should be the only decisive factors in determining a high school student's grade

Ok, quick overview. My oppenent's last round left numerous arguements dropped, he instead took little one's out that werent the arguements i was making. So since he has essentially dropped half my case, that i organized, you should extend, and vote on it. Also extend again that he doesnt have a case. It was the pro's job to prove why daily/attendance/homework is bad, not that tests are good. Ive conseded that tests are good because i am for tests AND daily/hw/attend. My oppentent barely touched on why daily/hw are bad, just how tests are good. I'll answer his 3 little arguements that are in a way irrelevant. Nervousness, cheating, and attendance are not what we are debating, he needed to prove why daily/hw were bad and misrepresent a students grade, his last rebuttal didnt touch on this. 1) Nervousness - this wasnt an arguement. This was one word used in a sentance to explain how sometimes kids do extremly well in class and understand a subject, but get nervous and do poorly on a test. He answer this one example but forgot about the other examples; like unpreparedness and bad studying because they dont go to class because the 179 days that aren't the test day dont matter. The whole point is that a year of studying and learning shouldnt come down to 10 questions that a student might forget. Next he uses a bunch of real life examples to show how end of year tests affect real-life, cool. Im totally for that. End of year tests are good but dont these people go to work/study/do daily stuff that builds up to that? doctors/lawyers/kid's all take courses to take these tests, and are evalutated daily on their work. Also by comparing life to "dont work until one day when it all matters" is a stupid, illogical comparisson to real life. Instead school should promote that every day matters and that everyday you should try your hardest becuase you are being watched. Extend that this wasn't an arguement or point, just example and that it shouldnt be thought of in voting decision. 2) Daily work/attendance - My oppenent says " If a teacher was a teacher who chose random times to distribute tests then the student would feel more pressure to go to class everyday on the fear that a test might come at any time" first this is unrealistic. Teachers must tell advance when a test should come, especially one that will be 100% of the grade, now when the kids know this date they will come in, review what it will be over and then come in and get mediocre grades weither they studied or not. Next he still hasn't proven that daily grades are bad, just that "they can be copied" but he has already said so can test. So even if ur copying your still repeating the material and making an effort, its better than skipping everyday b4 a test, that pro says in ok, they will just be in trouble when a tests come. This isn't how school goes. Kids can't and shouldnt do that. Everyday should be a challenging one that encourage a kid to particpate and engage in his/her own education to better themselves for the future. Only the con allows this situation to occur. Cheating - Silly arguement, he says you can cheat in both systems so it doesnt matter. This arguement doesnt outwiegh anything and doesn't effect anything either, if your cheating on daily work at least ur attending class and making an effort to get a good grade, also for those who DONT cheat there is a huge benefit and allows teachers to know who/what to teach better (he drops that daily work stimulates education grows and allows teachers to see progress). Finally he last statement is that, high school is to educate you so your ready for college...and sorta real life. True but college doesnt encourage students to never show up and dont do daily work. Also real life jobs require you to go to work EVERYDAY or your fired, no way around that. Sure there might be some days more important than others and you might take tests in jobs but i am totally for that. Pro needed to prove why daily+hw are bad and tests are good and con just need to say that tests are good, but so is the other stuff. In conclusion a) Oppenent doesnt have a case, no reason to vote b) hasn't stated why daily is bad, just that it can be cheated...so can tests c) dropped half my case so they outweigh d) School needs to teach reallife situations, only con does that. refer to paragraph above for example. e) his last rebuttal didnt make sense and took words outta context and hasnt attacked ANYTHING i was advocating in the last speech. f) all his situations/examples are unrealistic, ie: teachers giving out random tests, "yearly job tests Biggest voter: hasnt proven why daily is bad, just how tests are good. con advocates that test/daily is good. Vote con, thxs for debate. goodjob!