The Best (Insert Object Here) Can not be determined.

Responses: 1. People Have Different Standards Of Judging" I mean not to deny this fact. People have different standards of judgment just as much as they have different standards of life, or beliefs. Again, as I pointed out on my first round, that this should be somewhat realistic, or supported. Let me should an example. Lets say I am talking to this person on the streets. This person is a very patriotic person, and believes that no country can beat Jamaica. But, this person has no supported information to show this. I tell the person a few things that deny that fact (No offence intended to Jamaicans, I just needed an example, there is nothing wrong with the nation). I have nothing wrong with this fact, and was not was I pointing to. Some people judge because they have this thing called double standard. For example, in a family, there may have different standards to a son, rather than another set of standards of a daughter. "...at the end of any comparison there can still be a clear winner" Maybe in some comparisons, but not most. For example, unless there is a magical perfect world country, then the best country can not be clear, or determined. Although you could possible make a list of best countries of certain categories, a list just named "Best Nations" can never be possible. This could be the same with musicians. For example, you could determine who sold the most album. But you could not determined who was the most influential musicians, or the best singer. 2. "...You Can Always Find Something With A Better Quality" This statement is true, generally. In most cases, you with find a better thing better then the one before. My argument here is that nothing can be the best with everything, just common sense. Not anytime soon will we find anything of flawless proportions. If we do, I will be shocked. "...I might proclaim California to be the best state because of it's beautiful weather, one might be able to say that Vermont has even more (albeit different) beauty..." This is a matter of a person's opinion. Each state is beautiful in different ways. For example. California may have beautiful cities and beaches. As Vermont may have beautiful forests and small towns. But, there is no way to compare which state is better in beauty. Doing so would only be opinion, there is no way to prove a fact in that. "...Pro assumes that EVERYONE has to be in agreement about something in order for a "best" to be determined. However, that commits the bare assertion fallacy - assuming something to be true just because it says it's true" I never said that everyone had to argue in order to achieve a "best". My point in this debate was that a best cannot be determined, because it is a matter of opinion. Everyone standards are morals are different. There is a term that I think says a lot about this matter. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" ~ Buddha. This is basically saying no matter were you have got the information about something, do not believe it unless you have experienced it, and completely know it is true. Since I have run out of ideas to continue my argument at this time, I will end and continue my argument next round. Good luck!