Resolved: God Exists

First, I accept that it is impossible to 100% prove or 100% disprove the existence of God; Pro and I have agreed that, therefore, the better option will be chosen. Note: I did not express any support for M-theory in the last round; Pro seems to have misunderstood me. I said that both M-theory and the generally followed model of non-string dimensions, 4 in number, state that the Big Bang cannot be caused by an external force.Rebuttals: Uncaused Quantum FluctuationsAs I mentioned previously, due to the possibility of uncaused quantum fluctuations [1], there need not be a personal cause for the Big Bang. [2] If there need not be a personal cause to the Big Bang, with a lack of evidence for a personal cause, we can discredit a personal cause entirely. I will show how there can be uncaused quantum mechanical fluctuations. What are quantum fluctuations? In classical physics, energy is conserved, i.e. it can neither be created nor destroyed. [3] Therefore, it would seem that the sudden appearance of energy, as required by the Big Bang model, would violate the conservation of energy. However, physicists think the uncertainty principle offers a way around this problem. [4] There is a formulaic interpretation of the uncertainty principle. Let ΔE represent the uncertainty in the amount of energy andW10;t represent the uncertainty in the time. Then the product ΔEW10;t is approximately equal to ħ, where ħ = h/2π, and h is Planck’s constant. Planck’s constant has the value 6.62606957 x 10-34 Joule-second. [5] Notice that Planck’s constant has the appropriate units of energy and time. Planck’s constant is very small, so the uncertainties are vanishingly small on a macroscopic scale. [6] That is why the uncertainty principle is not observable in the macroscopic world. However, on the scale of subatomic particles, the uncertainties can be large compared to the quantities involved, so the consequences of the uncertainty principle can be significant on the microscopic scale. This is, essentially, the effect of a quantum fluctuation. These fluctuations are caused randomly, released from the quantum vacuum. [7] Explained in a simpler manner, a quantum fluctuation is a change in the amount of energy in a point of space originating in the quantum vacuum. These fluctuations generally affect thermodynamic systems. [8] DesignPenrose himself is against the concept of the universe being created by intelligent design. [9] Penrose's calculations are based on the assumption of the existence of negated probability. Gravity caused a random reaction that created the universe. The human mind refuses to accept randomness [1], but the universe is based on chaos and randomness. [10] You have not provided any arguments apart from the design ratios in relation to the existence of God. I request you to expand with a greater positive case based on the Design argument. Argument & ConclusionSince I have shown that, (a) Randomness is essential to the basic functions of the universe and (b) the universe did not need a sentient creator, I invoke the Occam's Razor principle [11] to state that the simpler explanation is more likely. Since the existence of God is not necessary, Occam's Razor states that God does not exist.MessageI too must thank you for a great debate so far. I am looking forward to your argument.References [1] Hawking, S.; Mlodinow, Leonard. The Grand Design. Bantam Books, New York (2008). ISBN-0-553-80537-1.[2] Faulkner, Danny R. "Quantum Fluctuations May Kill Big Bang Evangelism." Answers in Genesis. (https://answersingenesis.org...)[3] Empedocles (490-430 BCE), et al. [4] Heisenberg, W. (1927), "Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik", Zeitschrift für Physik (in German) 43 (3–4): 172–198 [5] P.J. Mohr, B.N. Taylor, and D.B. Newell (2011), "The 2010 CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants." (http://physics.nist.gov...[6] Ozawa, Masanao (2003), "Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and disturbance in measurement", Physical Review A 67 (4): 42105 [7] Browne, Malcolm W. (1990-08-21). "New Direction in Physics: Back in Time". The New York Times. (http://www.nytimes.com...) [8] Mandelshtam, Leonid; Tamm, Igor (1945), "The uncertainty relation between energy and time in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics", Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR (ser. Fiz.) 9: 122–128. English translation: J. Phys. (USSR) 9, 249–254 (1945). [9] http://news.bbc.co.uk... [10] Tisza, L. (1966). Generalized Thermodynamics, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 47,57. [11] "Simplicity." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (http://plato.stanford.edu...)