Time Travel is (theoretically) and will eventually be possible

"A point cannot be infinitely far away. Infinity is not a quantity." Yes it is. Infinity divided by infinity is one. It is an unlimited quantity. It might be too complex to completely understand, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. "Therefore, my opponent's mathematical representation of time is flawed." Who said I was talking about mathematics? I am talking about Philosophy and Science. Science in the sense of atoms and energy, and philosophy as in wisdom. Scientifically and Mathematically .000..1 is impossible, but philosophically you would be able to interpret what it represents. ""Time" the construct is not real, but "time" the actual entity represented by the construct IS real." I never said it wasn't real, but there is NO entity of time. There was a conceptualization, but if we removed all clocks in the world and all numbers, we could still survive. If we took all of everything within time and divided it by two (6 months in a year, 2 weeks in a month, etc.) then we would not be lost, we would survive. We have the ability to change time. There is no physical construct of time. Only an ideal conceptualization of time. Therefore, time is an idea and is not real in a physical sense. "We don't. Energy cannot be created or destroyed [1]." My mistake, if we could put the energy in line with that of other structures and create different energies in different formations (take energy and transform it, something which is possible) then this would be able to be accomplished. "This requires a large quantity of energy, causing an imbalance between the "new" old universe and the "old" old universe." This doesn't make sense. The "new" and "old" old universe? "Atomic decay cannot be reversed by any known means. Therefore, it is impossible to make atoms look younger." Who said anything about reversing? I am talking about rearranging. "How can something lay outside of time?" Because time can be taken away, as proven before. "1. We would have to know what the original person looked like, down to the atom. 2. We would have to find atoms that were in the exact right stage of decay and then assemble them into a person." 1. We actually have the technology which can look all the way down to the atom. 2. Or use the person themselves that already have the right decay stage. I'm not done with time travel yet. You think this was my only form of time travel? No. There is actually no law of physics that prohibits time travel. Space is bendable, just as time in able to be manipulated and bendable. If we were to launch through a worm hole, since a wormhole is a bend in time and space, we would be able to go through the bended time and space. Same as going at high speeds. Clocks in space stations above Earth have to be set a little bit faster, because as we move farther away from the Earths gravitational pull, clocks tend to be slower. It is also actually said that if we didn't have a moon, then the earth would spin faster, therefore having our days spin faster too. The moon goes in an opposite orbit of the spin, therefore taking it's miniscule gravitational pull and slowing us down. Actually, theoretically if we were to take two atomic clocks and put one on the ground and travel one at lightspeed, the one going lightspeed would be fairly slower than the one on the ground. Science, physics, and philosophy are able to destroy my opponent's arguments on this matter.