When in conflict, an Individual's free speech ought to be valued above a community's moral standards

Con's “free speech” is restricted by the rules of this debate (set by Pro in Round 1) must “adhere to the standard rules of Lincoln Douglas Debate.” In general, in the Lincoln Douglas debate, “The role of debaters is to argue a moral position, and to use logic and ethical reasoning to do so.”http://idebate.org...Is not the rules of Lincoln Douglas a “moral standard?” Therefore, Pro decrees this “moral standard” and valued it above Con's “free speech.” Con wanted to use an immoral position to stress Con's free speech, giving an example why “free speech ought” NOT “to be valued above a community’s moral standards.” Such demonstration will validate Lincoln Douglas' “moral standard” on the debating floor. Con's position is, “when in conflict, an individual's free speech ought to be valued” without governmental interference, while using the community's moral standards as the instrument in social evolution. What are the Physical Laws behind morality and freedom? All life must operate within the matrix of the Physical Laws of Nature, there are no exceptions. During the Enlightenment Era, inspired by John Locke, Thomas Jefferson discovered our Unalienable Rights of “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” There is scientific empirical evidence that morality is an outgrowth of Unalienable Rights, which is an outgrowth of the physical Constructal Law, which is an outgrowth of the Laws of Thermodynamics. Therefore, morality is part of the physical Laws of Nature, not some byproduct of man-made laws (Common law, etc.). http://www.amazon.com...http://www.amazon.com...According to Takac, there is an imbedded bio-program, found throughout all life. This bio-program is simply, once alive, "Life," must have the freedom (“Liberty”), in “the pursuit of” survival; otherwise, there is no life. Since we have life, survival is a form of positive-feedback and a prerequisite for human “Happiness.” Hence, Thomas Jefferson's celebrated discovery, which he declared “self-evident” and used the labeled Unalienable Rights representing a polished version of this bio-program by the following, “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”Morality is an outgrowth of life's Unalienable Rights in group formation. The binary values of morality is Right (moral) or Wrong (immoral). The objective of morality is doing Right keeping a group alive. That is, when two or more humans form a group, the group becomes alive. The life of the group is sustained through goodwill and kindness leads to a mutual moral respect for embracing the Unalienable Rights of the members within the group. Goodwill promotes order, stability, and harmony through the pursuit of group-wide positive-feedback. Over time, group-wide positive-feedback is the genesis of traditions, social values, beliefs, language, etc., the norms of society. These norms are tried and tested, and conservatively pass down from one generation to the next establishing its culture. A moral order guides an individual in the prudent exercise of judgment relative to those norms, going with the social flow minimizing civil resistance (Constructal Law). The individual in a civil society strives, albeit imperfectly, to be virtuous; that is, restrained, ethical, and honorable, respecting and embracing the Unalienable Rights of others relative to those tested norms. The objective of morality is to keep a group alive, is the evolution of traditions, social values, beliefs, language, etc, the norms of society. The empirical evidence of the diversity of language and social norms throughout history and today demonstrates the universality of morality, a thread that runs through the tapestry of humanity and life, the genesis of group formation. Morality simply refers to the binary state of Right or Wrong. These states generate mutual positive- or negative-feedback, relative to the Unalienable Rights of another. Mutual positive-feedback, in group creation, is found throughout the spectrum of life in the beneficial formation in schools of fish, flocks of birds, packs of wolves, tribes of humans, and in addition, inter-specie relationships, such as those between humans and their pets.The US form of governance (US Constitution) is a design based on the discovery of Jefferson's Unalienable Rights sparked a social experiment within a short period of 200-years, changed the world like no other society in recorded history, through the fruits of technology, food production, and medicine, the stables of human existence throughout the world today. A compelling example of what happens when our Unalienable Rights are morally free to flow, having minimal resistance (Constructal Law), within the awesome machinery of nature. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tg3Xzh2cXD8 Effective communication operates within a community's moral standards, having freedom from governmental interference. Such communication embraces the Unalienable Rights of others, using those moral standards as a tool, in a constructive debate, or “when in conflict,” as in the example of the moral conduct found in “the standard rules of Lincoln Douglas Debate.”The Lincoln Douglas Debate is an outgrowth of the US Constitutional mission to embrace and protect everyone's Unalienable Rights. In the beginning, the US started with a difficult task relative to the cultural reality of the day. Cultural norms do not change overnight, because they are inherently conservative. For example, slavery and woman's standing in society were deeply rooted in the culture, including the norms of the ruling-class, for they too reflect the culture of the day. Our founding Fathers knew Unalienable Rights will remove cultural ills, having freedom of speech from governmental interference, as a result, slavery (aka Lincoln Douglas Debate), and the treatment of woman, etc, in time during the moral evolution of culture will address and resolve those cultural ills. On the other hand, Ronald Reagan's concerns are valid for the US is in a post Constitutional era, where the institution of government is morphing to a tyrannical oligarchy. In addition, the government controlled educational system is subtly changing the community's moral standards, to value government policies above free speech. In closing, when in conflict, an individual's free speech ought to be valued above government policies during the conservative evolution of a community's moral standards. Relative to government controlled education, morality---a physical Law in Nature, should be a subject of study in a science class.