Resolved: On balance, I am not a troll.

1. Honestly, I'm very surprised the Prosecution hasn't brought this up yet but to prevent him from bringing it up in the last round where I can't refute him, I will refute it now. My infamous debate with iownu about who is a better troll (http://www.debate.org......), does NOT make me a troll. Just because I have skill at trolling (which I admit to in that round) does not make me a troll. For example, I have some skill at the Saxophone but that does not make me, on balance, a musician. The same can be said about trolling. Having an ability for it does not mean that I am one, that is a logical fallacy. I actually planned not to bring because I understand PART of what you saying there. But now that you bring it up I feel as though I should point out a few things that happened in that "Infamous" round..first and most likely the most obvious sign that points to you being a troll is this dialogIownu: he needs to gtfo because DDO is now my trolling turf.*this is obviously means that he does nothing but troll people, and he has done more than a couple"later on in the text you reply you: ... 3. I also affirm/negate unwinnable causes4. I have posted more trolls than you haveI'm specifically talking about number four, because he said that this is his "trolling" turf (meaning all he does is troll) by you saying you have trolled more then he has means you have trolled a considerable amount... far more than "on balance" 2. Now, another thing the Prosecution might bring up in his last round are some previous debates of mine where I have performed poorly. I will explain why those do not make me a troll.I'm was not going to call you out on this because I agree (and still do) just because you are terrible at debate doesn't mean you are trolling. "by definition we are all trolls" - The Prosecution contends that we are all trolls. That is false because A) the definition of troll states intent, and B) if we were all trolls, the word "troll" would not exist. As the famous saying goes "if everyone rich, everyone's poor." In an online community a troll is a distinct member, and the Prosecution still has not proven my uniqueness I.E. trollness to this website.A) yes it does say intent, I am not downplaying that, but feel free to explain debate to me... debate is showing INTENT to change a guys EMOTIONS towards a subject because you feel passionate about it. Unless you don't know you are debating, then you are showing intent to be a troll through the use of inflammatory.B) that statement is truly false, I think you misunderstood me, when I said me I meant everyone that participates in a debate, not the entire Internet. The word "troll" was not originated here, it originated elsware to describe people like us. Also no where in the definition of troll does it say distinct member. The resolution states "on balance" so even if I did admit that, it's irrelevant to the resolved until it's proven that I am a troll the majority of the time.you admitted you were a troll when I stated that every time you debate you are a troll, meaning every time you debate your trolling, I.E on balancenow for your definition, I am ignoring them because they did not come from a reputable source, but even if I did the ideal you are trying to argue (intent) I have already explained. yes it does say intent, I am not downplaying that... debate is showing INTENT to change a guys EMOTIONS towards a subject by arguing with him because you feel passionate about it. Unless you don't know you are debating, then by arguing with you opposer you are showing intent to be a troll through the use of inflammatory.=Closing=I have proven, that just by arguing his case, or any debate case he is infact a troll. Just by opening his mouth (or in this instance typing on his keyboard) he has shown intent to argue/debate which he has already agreed is a form of trolling. Because we are talking specifically about his participation on this debating site I have proven that because all he does on this site is argue, that he has "on balance" been a troll to this site.thank you for this debate, it was my first and definitly not my last.the prosecution rests.