Mormanism

We'll skip the catchy intro theme song for now and get straight to the nitty gritty eh? My opponent starts again saying this: "This is very limited evidence of the validity of Mormonism. I commend the Mormons for doing these good works. But many many other religions or cults do charity work for the poor; or missions work. So does that mean their religion is true? Of course not." However, proving whether the Mormonism religion is true is not the is not the purpose of the debate. My purpose is to prove that the Mormon religion has inspiration from God, however slight that may seem to Con. I would also like to point out that my opponent continues to quote the bible prove that Mormonism is a false religion, yet he has failed to present any legitimate evidence that the bible is the correct judge of religions. My opponent also says this about my claim. If God is good and wants the best for the people on Earth then the Mormon church is inspired by God. "That is a very weak argument. You could apply that to any religion or cult at all that stems from Christianity. Why not just say the Jehovah witnesses is a true religion, because (according to that logic) if God wants what's best for this world; then any religion that teaches about him must be true" This is kind of what I am trying to prove. Because a person cannot logically prove the validity of any scripture (whether it be bible or other holy works), any religion that actively spreads good to their neighbors (neighbors being defined very loosely) has to have some shred of divine inspiration through my first 2 assumptions in round 3. Is the Mormon church the end all be all correct church? Logically speaking, I cannot say. However, if we apply my two assumptions which my opponent has agreed on then it must be that the Mormon church has at least SOME inspiration from God. Now about this John D Lee guy: My opponent claim that this massacre was ordered by Brigham Young and carried out by John D Lee. However, Con's own source says that the massacre was carried out by "a band of three hundred angry Indians, infuriated over the Fancher train's alleged poisoning of water holes, was following them." (Fancher train being the victims of the massacre) John D Lee was accused of inciting this incident because he was the person in charge of Native American affairs and failed to contain the situation before it got out of control. Now then, moving on to other arguments made by con "Did not the bible say their would be false prophets to come? Con has failed to prove the validity of the Bible in a logical debate, so quoting it accomplishes nothing. Con also makes many arguments against Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon. To this I reply: so what? It would be impossible and an utter waste of time do debate the finer details of Mormonism in a logically debate. The point I am trying to make is that Mormonism has divine inspiration behind it, and that can be seen by the plethora of good works done my modern day Mormons. My con agreed that God is good ("Of course I agree that God is good"), by doing this he essentially agreed that the Mormon church has divine inspiration behind it. In closing I would like to restate the basis for why Mormonism is divinely inspired 1) God is good 2) People and organizations who do good must be inspired by God 3) The Mormon Church is an organization who does good and therefore is inspired by God My opponent has not refute this claim nor has be made a better one that holds up to logical examinations. I encourage voters to vote to whatever side they feel did better and would like to thank Con for a riveting and thought provoking argument. I would also like to take this moment to remind voters that assaults from the undead can happen at any time urged viewers to prepare for the inevitable. Thanks