Agnosticism makes no sense

Stated simply, Agnosticism's basic belief is that the existence of God is irresolvable. There are a great many people who believe this is untrue and that their specific belief or version of God is absolutely right. These people are commonly referred to as gnostics, whether they are gnostic theists, gnostic atheists, etc. At its very core, agnosticism recognizes the dangers in saying something like, "I absolutely know that what I believe is correct, and nothing will convince me otherwise." The danger in saying this is that you will close yourself off to new and better evidence that may reveal yourself to be more likely wrong or ignorant. Agnosticism is a recognition of the limited capacity of one's knowledge about the truth or falsity of certain claims, especially the claim of whether or not a deity exists. It should be important to recognize that agnosticism does not restrict people from having beliefs based upon evidence. An agnostic should never say that he knows certainly that a claim is true, but they can still say that one claim is more likely true than the other. Because of the limited capacity, scope, and logical functions of our minds, we cannot say certainly that one claim is true or false without entertaining the idea that there may be some evidence we don't know about or that we have misinterpreted. Because of this possibility for error, we as humans must recognize that we could always be easily wrong about something at any given moment. Agnostics are limited to saying that they believe a certain claim is more likely than the other only based upon the available evidence and their interpretation of that evidence. Agnostics usually express their beliefs using probability and estimations of whether one claim is more likely than the other. Expressing your beliefs through probability always leaves the possibility that you could be wrong, which is a healthy belief to maintain and check yourself against. There are people who have certain beliefs while still remaining agnostic, so you can still be a theist or an atheist while also being agnostic. As long as you recognize that your belief is based upon the available evidence and your interpretation of that evidence, and that you could easily be wrong about your belief, you can be considered an agnostic. Regarding God, many theists have gone to great lengths to render the idea of a deity unfalsifiable. Since there seems to be no compelling evidence for the existence of a deity, and there also seems to be no evidence that could possibly falsify it, we are forced to remain agnostic on the issue of God. The human mind cannot even comprehend a spaceless, timeless, eternal, omnipotent, and omniscient consciousness, so many attempts by humans to either prove or disprove the existence of God have been futile. Since many versions of God are incomprehensible, humans really cannot prove or disprove its existence. The only thing we can do is try to estimate its probability based on the available evidence we have. If God were even supposedly to reveal itself to a human, the human could not even be certain that it is God. The voice or figure could easily be a product of psychosis or schizophrenia, mental illnesses that have been reported to cause devestating effects. This brings up a startling fact; we can't even be certain that our experiences are real. Our reality could easily be a computer simulation, programmed into our minds, or even a false story that our minds have made up because of a mental illness. On top of this, our memories have repeatedly been shown to be inaccurate in various studies [1], causing us to question whether or not some of the things we remember are real. Because of all of this uncertainty about whether or not our experiences are real, whether or not certain things that we remember are real, and whether or not we have all of the available evidence and the correct interpretations of that evidence, the most rational course of action to the existence of God is agnosticism. The very idea of God is incomprehensible, and the beginning of our universe seems to be riddled with events we can't even begin to comprehend. The human mind cannot prove or disprove something that is incomprehensible to it, so agnosticism is really the only choice that makes sense. [1] http://www.northwestern.edu...