The British should have the right to bear arms

1----If the Queen dismissed the democratically-elected Government and announced that she would run the country herself, and demanded that British Citizens in future pay all their taxes directly to her, as she is entitled to do [1], the British people could form a militia in order to overthrow the Monarch and declare the country a republic, using their guns to fight the combined might of the Royal Navy, the Royal Air Force and the Army of which the Queen is the sovereign head and has, therefore, at her full command. [2]----- (Ha, sorry but why overthrow someone who is the rightful ruler of a government, just because she's a monarch? Or has taxes?Clearly in both worlds you will have to pay taxes so that is irrelevant, Secondly my opponent assumes that the Queen would be corrupt, yes assumes ,a fallacy if you will. He has no factual evidence nor can see the future for all we know the Queen could be benevolent leader, just because a government isn't democratic doesn't make it automatically corrupt. Lastly I wish to bring up a great mind of the enlightenment period Hobbes, pacifically Hobbes social contract which the right to be governed by a government is to protect its citizens, as long as a government is keeping its citizens safe it is providing its obligation as a government. Monarchy or not. ) 2----British Citizens would be able to use firearms to defend themselves against would-be attackers and intruders (unless, of course, the attackers and intruders also exercised their right to bear arms and were carrying guns as well).----- (Ok here my opponent makes a valid point, use firearms for defensive purposes, how ever he attacked himself by saying "unless, of course, the attackers and intruders also exercised their right to bear arms and were carrying guns as well". Well I say if firearms were not legal less distribution of firearms less likely a intruder has a gun. Also at this point I will like to point out my opponent has only talked about guns so I will go ahead and assume knifes and swords and such are illegal as well.) 3 –-- Guns make men look cool and hard in front of the girls--- (Clearly this statement is a joke, or you haven't got a clue on how stupid this sounds. For one not all girls like guns, likes and dislikes are a preference denpent upon a individual. Also clearly that meaning of a firearm is to hold power which should be taken lightly. A quote from my favorite movie 'With power comes great responsibility") 4----In conclusion, if Americans have the right to rise up against an oppressive regime and overthrow it in an armed coup d'état, and to go down the pub tooled-up in case it all kicks off at closing time, or to take pot-shots at people trespassing in their gardens, or to impress girls by shooting road signs, tin cans, etc., then British people should hold those same rights.---- (Ok for one he has no proof nor can he read the future that his government will become a monarch, nor be a corrupt monarch. Don't forget my Hobbes statement as well, that a governments obligation is to protect its people. Now for the kicker, his government right now is democratic and not corrupt so he has no need for fire arms. Secondly, guns being illegal means its less likely a person at a bar has one to start a fight,and again with the girls is just really silly why not learn kung fu or MMA takes more skill and practice than a gun. Some might say a gun is a cowards way of fighting he assumes all girls and everyone enjoys having a boomstick which clearly isn't the case.) -----My Case---- 1..Making firearms and weapons illegal reduces the distribution of firearms and weapons which makes it harder to possess them and reduces gun and weapon related crime. 2..Instead of guns and weapons we should have mandatory classes paid by the government to learn kung fu , marital arts, etc. This being more healthy,and providing self defense.