Islamic State is good.

FRAMEWORK:Firstly, I can't read Arabic. Many of the opposition's videos and sources are in Arabic, so I don't know what I'm supposed to do here? Secondly, the rationalization of mass murder is possibly the greatest war crime anyone could do. Morever, it is not within the rules of the debate to say that the "I cannot use CNN or BBC" as it wasn't a rule posted. The common definition of good here is whatever does not violate the categorical imperative, and the most frequent is: "do not kill those whose souls does not have the ability to harm you" The opposition has rationalized and endorsed this. Now, with this said, I shall reply to the opposition's points. *Don't look at the videos if you don't want to see nasty nasty stuff*O1. IS kills Civilians and ChildrenThe Islamic State did not have the HD cameras/weaponry that they had a year ago when this video was published, and the Free Syrian Army flag consists of the same color, but not the same logo that was present in the Islamic State. Formerly, the Islamic State was part of the Free Syrian Army, and before they broke in the Battle of Aleppo in 2014, they used the same television channels and many of the same logo. Moreover, how could these children be Shabihas? These are unarmed children, which are protected via the Geneva Convention and other HR conventions. Via justifying this, the opposition is justifying a crime and a haram in Islamic law. But perhaps this is not enough. Linked is another video showing the Islamists killing two bus drivers in Syria. ()Now, I would like to point out a major contradiction within the opposition's assertions: In his first contention, he says that the Islamic State kills armed men and spies only, but in his second assertion, he asserts that the Islamic State kills Christians who choose to not pay tax. This inconsistency exerts some type of power within his arguments: which one of these are really credible? I know as a fact that the second assertion is true, as the opposition justifies it in his third assertion (in R1) that the Islamic State kills innocent civilians who are not Islamic. On this ground, his assertions in the second round (when he "refutes" my claims of Islamic State mass murdering people) that the Islamic State does not kill based on religion and faith is totally worthless on these grounds. O2. IS kills Non-MuslimsI have not a single record of a just state making their citizens pay for practicing their religion. This is one of the burdens of a ultra-theocratic monotheist state. However, let us talk about the tax we are in question of here; the Jizya. The Jizya tax is a tax that is imposed upon every abled body man living in an Islamic State. This tax, when in practice during the early Caliphates, exempted the following: children, crippled men, the poor by biological basis, women, and others who are unable to provide for themselves. Now, is it not true that the Islamic State kills Christian children, a haram on the basis of quoted Quranic Verses, on the basis that they did not pay the Jizya tax? Now, if Caliph Baghdadi really desires for the creation of an Islamic Caliph, then he has to realize that all previous successful Islamic Caliphates tolerated everyone to practice his/her own faith, and to submit to the Islamic laws via tax, and not via blood. [6]With the prinicple of Jizya established, I shall now go on to talk about the justifications of the Jizya. Currently, there is no direct tax in any just society that one has to pay for the practicing of their own faith. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article II prohibits this action of intolerance practice in Islamic State today. Now, there are many examples of Islamic State groups killing Christian children and women, even when the Jizya tax only applies to men. They are being prosecuted in Mosul, Kirkuk and other places of Iraq and Syria. After an advance on Arsal in Lebanon, they even wrote "we are coming to behead you, worshippers of the Cross" on some Churches within firing distance from Arsal. Even if the Islamic State attempts to implement some type of Jizya, they will not be accepted until they find a way to incorporate religion into a sort of nationalism that they must espouse. [3, 4]O3. Diwans1. Diwan of EducationThe new Islamic State system of education is a one sided educational system which only focuses on breeding more Osama Bin Ladens, and not more thinkers. Islamic State schools have cancelled sociology, history, art, music, civics, philosophy, Christian religious studies, and psychology. This has turned that Islamic State's Education into a Diwan of Jihadism, and this is in no way beenficial to the world. In biology class, teachers are not allowed to refer to evolution as it is an "infidel science" In Arabic class, no one is allowed to recite polytheist poems. In math, the words democracy, elections and donations are taken out of all the questions referring to it. The Syrian and Iraqi children under these educational system have no more identity; they are not Syrians, nor are they Iraqis. The Takfiris are eradicating all national loyalty that they have. (And the Ba'ath "Loyalists" still think they are fighting and dying for the sake of Iraq?) [1]Education is supposed to be a process in which the ends is to create more free-thinkers and more wise students, not to create more one-minded Takfiris. If the learning of ways to "kill people, murder people" etc. is important to the opposition, then I can affirm to him that the world does not see it as wholly important. The world sees it as a useless relic of a violent past.2. HealthcareHealthcare in the Islamic State has failed. In the city of Mosul, the ultimatum to doctors "come back and serve us, or never come back ever again" has not resulted in any good results. In Syria, the Islamic State obstructed a huge delivery of medicine to al-Raqqah, and in Mosul, medicine is expensive mainly because the Islamic State blocks humanitarian organizations from delivering medicine and such! Pharmacists and doctors are forced to smuggle in medicine and are forced to sell them at twice the normal price. The Iraqi state has attempted to liberate these people from suffering, but they always fear IS's intervention. Many Islamic State hospitals are currently out of wheel-chairs and there are no prospect for those who are currently suffering from a complicated diseaseIs this effective? Is this really the creation of an effective healthcare system in which the world must worship? If the Islamic State really had humanitarian aims, then it would stop all this senseless barbaric killings and allow humanitarian organizations to worship and send aid to help the starving citizens of Raqqah, Mosul and other IS territories. [2]3. JusticeJustice is not the emplacement of law and order in one place. It consists of the following: (1) the equal treatment of all citizens by law, regardless of faith and religion, (2) the giving of one his reasonable due, (3) the emplacement of laws which consent has been retrieved from those who live under it, and (4) equal distribution of law enforcement agencies.Put this in context with the analysis of the Islamic State's laws. Accordingly to the interpretation of IS laws, simply using drugs is punishable by death. A man has a certain liberty in him to choose to smoke or to be Christian that no one can take away, with just conscience that is. The Islamic State treats Christians as if they were criminals and murderers, and kills them without any fear of it being haram. The Islamic concept of Haram is imposed on all followers of Islam, but not on those who fight a Jihad? Was it not the Quran that declared that "[Allah's] mercy extends to every soul" If the Islamic State truly wants to be Islamic, then it has to stop cherry-picking from the Quran and embrace the true nature of Islam; a humanitarian anti-killing religion.4. CurrencyThe biggest scam in history? I want to object to this, but before that, I shall analyse the IS currency as of current. IS's dinars has a gold weight of 4.25g (or 20 Arabic Karats). Such coins would require immense amounts of gold, in which I do not believe the Islamic State has, to mine in huge quantities. In fact, these coins will be worth $600 in the current markets. The fact that they are going to make money out of something that is instantly tradeable without need to be coined or minted will severely limit the usages of this coin. Apart from this, since the currency are made out of gold, the price of the IS currency is not determined by the Islamic State, but rather by gold dealers in London and Zurich. There are more implications of this; gold has an international value which is highly intercorrelated with wheat and oil. If the prices of gold double, the international value of wheat and oil decreases, and this reduces the price of which Iraqi and Syrians living under the Islamic State could sell their products, giving off for a much lower standard of living. These factors will highly effect the new economy of the Islamic State, which now faces huge SoL deficits. However "glorious" this introduction may be, it is not enough to skyrocket the economy of the Islamic State. History could tell you that: the same principles of economic and monetary pricing was adopted by Abd Al-Malik, and this failed miserably. This caused a return to the main tenants of using Hebrew-based monetary styles in the Ummayid Caliphate. [7,8]With this, I hold the resolution negated. Peace be upon you, my friends. Citations:[1] http://www.al-fanarmedia.org...[2] http://www.stripes.com...[3] http://www.cbn.com...-[4] VICE, "Hezbollah Battles IS for Lebanon"[5] Source 4, R1[6] http://en.wikipedia.org...[7] Bloomberg[8] Forbes