Resolved: The Qur'an contains scientific foreknowledge

PARAGRAPH A:[A] "Social sciences are in fact science: The recording of true facts as data to be analyzed is Science."1: Sure.[B] "Therefor, when the Quran states, "make sure you can tell the difference between Pagan Muslims (non believers) and Muslims," this is a reference to scientific applications regarding the false judgment of People of Faith in direct association with false followers. .... This true scientific statement regarding associating false religion with true religion is in fact a True FACT which could not have otherwise been guaranteed, but the Quran says there will be false followers of even itself."1: Pro fails to cite any specific sura or verse. To prove that the foreknowledge is in the Qur'an, Pro must show *where* in the Qur'an the foreknowledge is.2: Basically, Pro states that the Qur'an miraculously predicted that people would pretend to be Muslim. I don't think that this demonstrates foreknowledge; it's a common thing for people to lie, and even in Muhammad's day surely people hid their religion to prevent getting punished for their beliefs. In other words, this "foreknowledge" is merely normal human knowledge, which anyone could have picked up without needing Allah's help. As such, it fails the definition of Qur'anic scientific foreknowledge.[C] "It then goes on to say int eh same sentance to, "know the difference between pagan Christians (non believers) and Christians", so that you do not confused them with one another, or judge one for the others actions, or associate the positive behaviors of one as reflecting qualities of the others."1: Basically, Pro states that the Qur'an tells us to differentiate nonbelievers and Christians, and not to associate their behavior. This isn't foreknowledge -- it's not hard to find out that nonchristians and Christians act differently.[D] "which is a common struggle nowadays regarding Agnostics claiming to be atheist (leaving woman to believe true atheists are part of a community associated with moral standards instead of selfish comfort zones.)"1: I don't understand Pro's point here.[E] "You might claim such a scientific fact however, is not Foreknowledge, so please allow me to have you discontinue any rebuttals regarding Paragraph A."1: Erm, that's the whole point of this debate -- to point out that such facts aren't foreknowledge.PARAGRAPH B:[A] "This KNowledge was in fact the KNowledge which unified an entire Nation, converting the entire middle east. Because one man was capable of leading such a task, and overcoming such odds, when in reality people quickly abandoned Gods who were not self serving, was a miraculous accomplishment. It is Scientific Foreknowledge to Spread word that would for over 1000 years unify a people in faith after successful converting their ancestors without creating a conflict within the message. That is, regardless of Divine INTERVENTION, a Prophetic deed. That is scientifically accurate."1: By this logic, any religion that spreads would have scientific foreknowledge -- including Christianity and Hinduism, for example.2: Pro basically argues that Muhammad's success story in evangelizing Islam proves the Qur'an's foreknowledge. This isn't *scientific* foreknowledge, which should predict a fact of science. This is merely good evangelism. You don't need knowledge of the science of the future to spread a religion in the now, but merely convincing rhetoric.PARAGRAPH C:[A] "The Bibles account of Creation is scientifically accurate: you can actually prove it occurred."1: Nope [1][2].[B] "But, this was not in the Quran, and in fact it was not foreknowledge, except that it wasn't available for us to scientifically prove until modern day, it was past-hand-knowledge."1: So... It's not *Qur'anic* scientific *fore*knowledge?[B] "The Quran however, says clearly, "God is the God of Many Lights." and so, -As Light was miraculously conceived on Earth as a child, it Can likewise miraculously and spontaneously appear anywhere where Light energy does not already exist in open space. Causing another universe to appear in the same Space proximity Model as our own."1: How does "the God of Many Lights" relate to the 2nd point?2: What is the point Pro's making? Light doesn't spontaneously appear. What is a "space proximity model" as our own?[C] "Light as wisdom: can be perceived from many angles and conditions, meaning true wisdom has variable forms and cannot always be offered in the form of certain words of advice. This is of prophetic genius to spread regarding the past inhabitants of the words arrogance and incompetence."1: Past wisdom can be reinterpreted, but light really can't. Light comes from one direction and goes to another, along a single path. If light is wisdom, then wisdom must be a single path.REMARKS[A] I anticipate your response, and please humble acknowledge my error.1: No prob.SUMMARY1: Pro has not shown any areas in which the Qur'an made a statement about scientific fact that could not have been known at the time of its writing.REFERENCES[1] http://rationalwiki.org...[2] http://rationalwiki.org...