The Teleological Argument is a sound argument for God's existence.

Premise 2: It is highly improbable that [the universe] resulted from chance. While there is currently speculation that life exists elsewhere in the universe, there is no proof of it. Of course, it would be a logical fallacy to assume there is no life simply because there is no evidence of it. But one might wonder that if other forms of intelligent life are possible, then why don't we see them in our own galaxy? If it's possible life can arise that breathes carbon dioxide instead of oxygen, then why isn't there life on Mars? While we can speculate that life once existed on Mars, there's no evidence that a civilization has ever existed there. In fact, it seems that the odds of life existing naturally on this planet are so astronomical, that if we ever did find life on other planets it should only prove to support Theism rather than Atheism. It is not simply that I can't see an explanation so once doesn't exist. I don't see how a natural process can create order. I've posed this to many atheists and have never received a good answer. I've received a circular argument, that we see order in nature so we know nature produces order. I've never known a bomb that explodes and constructs a building. How can a non-intelligent process create order? It seems far more likely that an intelligent Creator is behind the universe. We can even use Con's own webpage as an example. While it may be astronomical that all the numbers appear in that sequence, what naturalists would have us believe is that when you load up that webpage all the numbers will line up in order, from 0 to 9 and repeat from 0 to 9 each time. Or that if you're under a tree in California and the leaf falls, it will land in China. When you load up the page, one sequence of numbers will have to come up. Or if you're sitting under the tree and a leaf falls, it has to land somewhere. But life did not have to develop on Earth. In fact, as I mentioned, just one minor thing could have gone wrong and life would not have developed here. Can Con show that life had no choice but to develop on Earth? This is the essence of his argument from the random numbers or the leaf falling. Con also mentions that another form of life would have arisen in our place if we hadn't developed here, but I don't think there's any evidence for that, either. Why did life have to arise at all? Why couldn't this have just been another barren world, and no intelligent life exist in the universe? I would, of course, state that the giraffe is intelligently designed. Now, Con here gives a possible scenario of ancient giraffes who did not have such long necks and through the process of mutation grew longer necks out of necessity. Is there any proof that such giraffes like this used to exist, or is this just a "plausible theory" that fits in with the theory of evolution? Also, why wouldn't the giraffes have just died out instead of growing longer necks, a process that, presumably, takes thousands or millions or years? Also, why does necessity give us mutations? If the Earth were suddenly completely flooded and filled with water, do you think humanity would drown and die out or do you think humans would live long enough and develop gills? Premise 1: The universe resulted either from design or chance. While I am familiar with the assumption that other universes exist, I'm not sure this can ever be proven. However, if there are other universes that exist, then why don't they ever collide with ours? You would think that if millions or billions of universes actually exist, that they'd be colliding with each other. This happens to galaxies within our universe. Supposing the exist of other universes seems to be begging the question to me. In fact, arguments for or against the existence of God could also be used to argue the existence of universes. It seems that arguing for or against the exstence of other universes is putting the cart before the horse. If there is a God, then it's entirely possible that He created other universes as well. If there is no God, then the possibility of other universes seems even more unlikely.