The Ultimate Goal of the Gun Control Lobby is to Ban and Confiscate All Guns

http://www.youtube.com...In the first video, either watch the entire thing or please skip to 5:50.http://www.youtube.com...http://www.youtube.com...http://www.youtube.com...BradyCampaign History and StatisticsThe Brady Campaign Originally started as the National Council to Control Handguns, whose primary agenda was to try and ban and confiscate all handguns. Are we supposed to believe that they suddenly changed gears and no longer wish to ban handguns, or did they simply rearrange their priorities to try and pass a little legislation before potentially revisiting these previous proposals? http://bradycampaign.org...http://www.theatlantic.com...Next, several of the proposals and ideas promoted by the Brady Campaign are vague and not based on any legitimate research or science, but can more or less be reworked to push a complete gun ban. One of these is the famous Assault Weapons Ban. Banning Assault WeaponsSenator Feinstein defined Assault Weapons to be anything they perceive to have certain scary features. For example, the entire assault weapons ban was organized around banning the AR-15 rifle. The Ruger Mini-14 fires the exact same bullet and literally operates in the exact same fashion as the AR-15 insofar as its semi-automatic and can accept large capacity magazines, but because it does not have a pistol grip, barrel shroud, or a muzzle flash it would have been legal to own. In other words, a mass shooter could literally accomplish the exact same task with either an AR-15 or a Ruger Mini-14. The correct approach would have been to scientifically evaluate which weapons were more deadly and assess their practical civilian use, but ultimately they were simply trying to ban a small portion of guns. Perhaps after another mass shooter accomplished the same task with say, a handgun or the Ruger Mini-14, it is not inconceivable that they would demand more and more guns be banned. http://www.feinstein.senate.gov...Saturday Night SpecialsA saturday night special was designated to be any cheap handgun which had lower than normal standards. Because they were cheap, the Brady Campaign assumed criminals could have access to more of these guns. As time went on, they've continued to redefine the definitions of saturday night specials to be any gun cheap enough for the poorer Americans to own, although there have been conflicting studies in whether or not these guns were most commonly used by criminals or not. http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.motherjones.com...Proposed StatisticsIf the Brady Campaign truly was solely focused on controlling guns, they would not continue to post the following statistic. "Although guns can and have been used successfully in self-defense in the home, a gun in the home is 22 times more likely to be used to kill or injure in a domestic homicide, suicide, or unintentional shooting than to be used in self-defense."This statistic obviously implies that all guns should be banned, or at least guns are a health hazard to anyone who owns one. The problem with this implication is that this statistic is that the methodology for which it was determined was flawed, and thus an inaccurate statistic. If all they wanted was to regulate guns, they would not post a statistic which encourages complete gun bans. For an account the flawed methodology of this statistic is false, please see video 4. Also It fails to reconsider correlation and cause. People may buy guns specifically to commit suicide with, and people may buy a gun because they are worried of being a victim of a homicide. http://bradycampaign.org...