The Microsoft Zune HD is better than the comparative Apple Ipod Touch

I offer my apologies if I was incorrect on one of my statements " Iput this in contendence with your statement "4)" where you state that "These are all things that the Ipod Touch cannot do. " Incorrect as the Ipod touch can. .. ". The ipod touch does have the capabilities to buy music wirelessly from the device. But as for having questionable sources, I encourage you to visit the websites. The error was not the fault of any of my sources, as i did not source anything in that sentence "These are all things that the Ipod Touch cannot do. " Therefore, why do you question the credibility of my sources? That is an unneccesary accusation that has no grounds. I will return the favor. You question my sources while not including any yourself. I hope you can see how that might be portrayed as hyporcritical. As far as I know, your arguements are founded on nothing farther than your own mind. But for the sake of the debate, I will assume that your arguements are legitimate. Finally, I ask that you use better grammar next time so that I can clearly understand your points. This request is in regards to your opening line "My critiscism is in terms of harddrive space and the zune Hd can have only have the memory of an Ipod Touch which can have 64GB harddrive. " ::Defence:: "the zune Hd can have only have the memory of an Ipod Touch which can have 64GB harddrive. " . .. .. .. .. .. Zune HD. .. .Ipod Touch . .8gb. .. .. .. .. x. .. .. .. .. .. .. .$199. . 16gb. .. .. .$219. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. x. .. . 32gb. .. .. .$289. .. .. .. .. .. $299. . 64gb. .. .. .. .. x. .. .. .. .. .. .. .$399. . [2] While I agree that the extra storage option is nice, it is outrageously priced. While it is difficult to directly compare price versus storage due to the fact that they are only both available in the 32gb size, the Zune HD has the better price in that category. Therefore, the zune gives you more storage for your dollar. Also, compare the Zune HD 16gb with the Ipod Touch 8 GB. The prices are fairly close, only $20 away. I argue that, while the 64gb Ipod Touch does appeal to a larger audience, that audience probably consists of very few people. The extra hundred dollars will turn away most consumers. "the Ipod touch in comparison to the Zune has a larger screen at 3.5 inches in comparison to the Zune's 3.3 inch display. " The Zune HD has a 16:9 resolution screen [1] and has the same pixel height. I argue that the Zune HD has the optimal size for viewing high definition widescreen content. More pixels means less battery. Therefore, the Zune HD has the better video playback. As for the output quality, a dock is not the only way to export video. A cable can be used. ". .. bluetooth, and allows the user to sync and download music from the itune store easily. " How exactly does bluetooth help you "sync and download music" more easily than with wireless? This is an unneccesary feature that wastes battery life. ". .. from the images i have seen. .. ". You have never seen a Zune HD in person? I question your credibility to accurately debate this arguement. I have seen and used both devices. ". .. not aesthetically pleasing or modern in any ways. .. ". I disagree. It is much better than the cluncky metallic silver of the Ipod Touch, which smears easily. ". .. the zune weight 65% the weight of the touch. .. " Thank you for proving my exact point. ". .. apple offers an inscription service on all Ipods. .. " Correct. Thanks for the research. . .. .. .. .. .Zune HD. .. Ipod Touch. (battery life) Music. .. ..33h. .. .. .. .. .. .30h. .. .. .. Video. .. ..8.5. .. .. .. .. .. .. .6h. .. .. .. [1] [3] Do you think that either company would test this with wireless on? No. ::Conclusion:: Vote Pro. Con fails to provide references, has never seen (in person) the Zune HD, and makes empty accusations. ::References:: [1] . http://www.zune.net... [2] . http://www.zunescene.com... [3] . http://www.apple.com...