Men with small packages will have a hard time pleasing a woman in the bedroom

Acknowledgement of my opponent and the low burden of proofI would like to begin round 3 by acknowledging the courage of my opponent in proudly proclaiming that he has a small package way back in round 1. Also, he gladly was not satisfied by my poorly-worded burden of proof statement (which I composed in a highly emotional mood while lamenting the size of my penis) and rightly deduced that I wanted something more in the debate. I of course was not implying that small packaged men could NEVER please a woman in the bedroom, because as 50 Shades of Gray told us, all you need is a whip and a wallet full of Benjamin Franklin's to please a woman nowadays.With the pleasantries aside, I would like to point out that the following arguments I made have not yet been addressed:On the issue of psychological torment"It’s true. A man with a large penis is usually so impressed with his Penis size that he literally is not forced to put the same amount of thought and effort into sex as a guy with a smaller penis, and I don’t doubt that women are impressed with big penises, when they see them, but it’s more of a novelty."I'm glad my opponent agrees with me on the psychological aspects of the penis debate, however he casually dismisses it with a wave of his hand like David Copperfield making the Statue of Liberty vanish (a big and long statue, by the way). I disagree that it's a mere novelty. If my opponent agrees that women are impressed by men with large penises when they see them, I conjecture that they are equally unimpressed with a small penis when they see them. Do you disagree? Do women look at a small penis and say "Wow!" or do they likely say "Umm..."? Likewise, if my opponent says that men with large penises do not have to worry and exert less effort in sex, I conjecture that the opposite is true as well, that men with small penises have more to think about when they initiate the love-making process. These mere thoughts alone can kill the mood and rhythm of sex, leading to maybe a fulfilling sexual experience, but never as fulfilling as that of the large penised man. Sexual mindset can make or break the experience.On the issue of cheatingHe then cites a study done in Kenya about women cheating on men. I had a closer look at the study while in my mom's basement, and I discovered that only 5-6% of the sampled women cheated because of larger penis size. HOWEVER, the same study found that a whopping 29.4% of women cheated because they were denied a sexual position that they wanted, which was argument number three that I made in round 1. Furthermore, 52.9% cheated because they failed to reach orgasm. Now the last one will be explained more fully in the succeeding paragraphs, so remember it for now.Here is the table of figures for the study: http://journals.plos.org...My opponent then argues that the vagina can expand up to about 4 1/2 inches. While this is true for some, others can reach up to a maximum of 7 inches, and this is an unaroused state, as mentioned in this Columbia University Q and A, way beyond the small penis cap of 5.Source: http://goaskalice.columbia.edu...These extra inches are important and tackled next.On the issue of girth and wasted penis lengthMy opponent then says girth matters. I agree, but girth is irrelevant in this debate, since a long penis and a short penis could have the same girth, so it does not matter either way. What we ARE talking about is whether those extra inches matter in satisfying the woman. My opponent says it's just a waste of penis, but I disagree for the following reason: my opponent mentioned that only the outer 1/3 of the vagina has the most sensitive spots. Sure, but does that mean that the sensitivity suddenly disappears the further you are down the vaginal canal? Do the nerves lining the canal disappear? No. So even if the outer 1/3 is the most sensitive, the remaining 2/3, which for some women could go up to seven inches as mentioned above, still contains sensitivity nonetheless. In this manner, a small packaged man can only stimulate the outer 1/3, whereas the full-blown stonemason can use his chisel to carve out the full length of the tract and hit ALL the sensitive spots. So size does matter, and no penis length is wasted as my opponent claims otherwise.On the issue of not trusting what women say with regards to sizeThe website my opponent gave is currently down. I cannot comment on it because I have not seen it, so I will defer this section until the next round.On the issue of clitoral and vaginal stimulationMy opponent has cited a study in a book (which I will not purchase just for the sake of this debate, but will nontheless concede to be true by default) that only 25% of women have consistenly vaginal orgasms. He argues that clitoral orgasms are more common hence penis size rarely matters at all in the end. However, note that 25% is still a large number of women. That's one in four women. Also, note further that the study also said that about half of them sometimes have an orgasm and sometimes not. I would argue that the difference of sometimes having them and sometimes not is penis length as noted in this study quoted below:"For the study, researchers from the University of the West of Scotland had 323 women answer an online survey that tracked what they did in bed over the previous month. In the survey, they noted how often they orgasmed, what type of orgasm they had, and the size of their partner's penis.According to the survey results, women who have frequent vaginal orgasms have an easier time hitting the big O with guys who have a longer penis. Women who prefer to have penile-vaginal sex (instead of oral or other types of sex) also say it's easier for them to climax with a guy who is bigger."Hence, what we found out here is that size does matter when it comes to vaginal orgasms.Source: http://www.cosmopolitan.com...On the issue of being a stud Granted, I used stud as more or less a toungue-in-cheek term rather than actually proposing that smaller men are somehow completely incapable of pleasing any woman. My opponent has responded that there are other factors to consider in being a stud. I agree with him. Nontheless, sex is also one factor that has to be considered, and many women find it important.Source: http://idiva.com...And as my opponent's study at the start of this debate mentioned, women are likely to cheat if they find their sex lives less than satisfying. A large penis can adapt very well to the sexual demands of women for the many reasons I mentioned above, whereas smaller men will have a much harder time.Conclusion:Nonwithstanding the poorly worded burden of proof I began this debate with, I have argued that larger penises grants more mental confidence and well-being on both parties when it comes to sexual performance, and can hit all the pleasure spots in a woman and cause them to have deep vaginal orgasms in addition to clitoral orgasms. Furthermore, my notion that some sexual positions can be better achieved with a larger penis has not been refuted and still stands. The study mentioned above also notes that women who were denied their requested sexual position were 29.4% more likely to cheat, hence a larger penis can prevent extramarital affairs quite handily compared to a smaller penis.