My Case Against Miscegenation.

I strongly believe in the preservation of the unique culture, heritage and genes of all races and ethnicities of mankind. Indeed it is conscious preservation of this which gives us TRUE diversity among people's and culture. I very much appreciate and wish to retain this true diversity, just as I appreciate the diversity that exists within any species of animal, from different kinds of butterfly to different breeds of dog. It is clear and obvious to me that if your society absorbs multiple other cultures who are not like you in culture nor in appearance, that in one or two generations you are at serious risk of weakening the host nation and people, their culture, their heritage. It is very rare for multiple races, different ethnicities and different religions to live peacefully and successfully side by side inside the same borders. Anywhere that it exists it has always led to tribal conflicts eventually. Many nations in the Middle East are a good example of what can happen when those differences in culture, religion and ethnicity reach a climax - it spills over into bloody violence as different peoples compete and different peoples conflict over their vast cultural and moral differences. All across Europe we can see with our own eyes and examine the data of the past two decades, and what we can see is that the incoming cultures(from say Pakistan and Africa), tend not to truly 'assimilate' at all, often times choose to live among their own by taking over whole neighbourhoods, and committing a disproportionate number of serious crimes. This is again more proof of the decay and break down of society that you get when you impose vastly different cultures and peoples on a host nation and people. This then leads to miscegenation. The African race or the Chinese people can afford some level of miscegenation. Aside from all else there are perhaps more than one billion of each on the planet today. However, if as a people you are the World's minority then miscegenation literally represents a very real and potential threat to the future of your own particular people. Would an African say it just didn't matter if, in the future, the unique identity and look of the African people's would be altered and gone forever? Would it be seen as dishonourable for a Japanese person to seek out, marry and want to have children with another Japanese person? Does it get seen as 'racist' or 'hateful' that the majority of Jews(whether religious or atheist), seek out, marry and want to have children with another Jew? Rhetorical questions really, since the African would never say such a thing about his own people, the Japanese person would not be viewed negatively for wanting to preserve the Japanese people, and the Jew would not be called a bigot for seeking out and having children with another Jew. It seems self evident to myself and an increasing number of others, that wishing to marry and have children within your own race and ethnicity provokes a negative reaction only if you are European/white and openly state it. Set against the backdrop in the media, Hollywood and academia that exists, it appears to me that if you are white or European and simply want to preserve your own people's future and lands that you are 'evil'. This standard applies to no other race or people that hold such natural aspirations - only to whites and generic Europeans. Furthermore, it appears that it's only in majority white Western nations that miscegenation is habitually pushed and potrayed, be that through the conduit of TV adverts, film or some other means that has a mass audience. The sheer scale of inter racial relationships that are potrayed through those poweful means feel like one mass advertising campaign and promotion for miscegenation. And yet, one would not watch TV or cinema in Israel and generally see Jewish characters portrayed being married to and having children with non Jews. One would not ordinarily watch Japanese TV or cinema and witness much in the way of inter marriage and mixed race children involving Japanese and Africans. And I would wager than in China and India, their popular culture will show Chinese people with their own and Indian people with their own. No one judges them for it, no one demands they make it more 'equal', no one lobbies for more white people to appear, and no one thinks either they or their pop culture are 'wrong' for doing it. Again, it is only white and European people that would be judged and demonised, and literally disallowed from promoting marriage and childbirth between their own kind in any way at all. Is it merely a coincidence that in ALL of the above cases the only people that measures appear to be in place for to counter a people that want to preserve their own unique heritage and look are European people's? If it is, it is one remarkable coincidence indeed. There are around 200 breeds of dogs in the World, each unique in it's own way, both in terms of looks and nature. The German Shepherd and the Dalmatian are both nice dogs in their own way. They are both canines, and you could get a litter from them. But why would you want to, esp. if in doing so you destroyed the lineage of both the German Shepherd and Dalmation only to have this irregular mongrel dog? It's the unique differences between those two dogs, both in look and in habit that make them so wonderful and to ruin that does not seem in any way a positive. The nature of the German Shepherd makes it an excellent police dog(among other things). The Dalmatian originally ran alongside carriages. A litter of dogs between the two breeds would not give you a dog that was better at either function than the original dog would have been. You can only preserve the unique identity of the breed if you mate a German Shepherd with another of it's kind . I assert that whites and Europeans are taught to self hate and as part of that they are encouraged to marry and have children with those of another race, and I assert that this is a phenomenon that appears exclusively aimed at whites and Europeans and no one else, not anywhere else. What would happen if European men all married and had children with African women and European women did the same with Chinese men? And what would then happen as their children grew up, formed relationships and had children with one another? In a few short generations the unique identity of beauty of all the different European people's would be utterly impaired or destroyed and for good. It doesn't even need to be ALL European men and women, simply a tipping point %, and esp in light of the very recent flood of non European immigration and the high birth rates of those incomers v the low birth rates of Europeans. It is for reasons of wanting to preserve the true diversity that has existed among people's for a long time that I consider Miscegenation.a negative, and especially for the minority race on Earth - the European people's. Sources and citations http://www.theguardian.com... http://www.frontpagemag.com... http://www.nytimes.com... http://www.telegraph.co.uk...