Capitalism

I will debate each one of your points. I don't think you will be able to redeem yourself after this debate either. And just as a friendly word of advice, make sure to do better on your spelling, especially on the word Capitalism. You will get penialized for that. Response to Point 1: What do you mean no classes? Response to Point 2: I know all about Marx and Communism. That is one reason I love Capitalism, because Communism is so awful. I would like to live in an utopia, but realize that utopia is unattianable. In utopia, everyone has the same amount of money, materials (products or items), and social position. Communists of all people should know that it is in human nature to be greedy. This nature prevents people from accepting an everyone is equal utopia. Communism seeks a militant or totalitarian state until the state can acheive utopia. People will always revolt against the system, making for a permenant state of totalitarianism. In other words, North Korea would be starving for eternity or until the regime falls. Capitalism produces Rich, Middle Class, and a few poor. Communism produces all poor. Response to Point 3: Locke's theories only support Karl Marx's ideals. They give no reason why they are better than Capitalism. Marx and Locke were simply two people who believed in the same anti-Capitalist ideals. It would not make any difference to support Communsim with either Locke or Marx. But both of their reasonings are flawed. Response to Point 4: OWS is a living proof that some people in America are stupid and gullble. Do you really think that the OWS protestors are good backers to your argument? You are saying that the people who sit on the side of the street and don't bathe for two months are good backers to a debate? Nobody respects them. Only Communists believe them. Belief and respect are two different things. OWS is still trying to figure out if they are protesting against Capitalism or if the are protesting to be allowed to camp on public property. I'm sure the Communists wish that OWS was a more organized movement. Response to Point 5: Your point is? Of course Capitalism is the stock exchange. But it is also free enterprise, free people, free religion, free state, and a free economy. Communism is just a repressed state. Response to Point 6: What kind of an idiot are you? You think that Cuba and the former USSR are good examples of a socialistic economies? They are the worst examples? Look at the former USSR, terribly run-down, people living off almost nothing, and a deficit and economy in disaster. Look at Cuba. An economy in disaster and a people who have no toilet paper (that's right; it was reported they have a shortage of toilet paper because the Government won't allow it to be produced). I think you just ruined your argument with that point. Response to Point 7: No classes? Is that good? Because instead of a lower, middle, and upper class, there will be just a lower class (or Communistic class). At least in Capitalism, some people can live comfortably or even be rich, not all get only barely survive. Response to Point 8: OWS will not lead to Communism or Fascism. The whole group is falling apart. They are losing membership and press coverage. Why do you keep sourcing OWS? They are not a viable source. Response to Point 9: Your point? What kind of a radical? I don't believe in most wars. I don't believe in spreading power. Response to Point 10: Socialism is the Government ownership of Business and the Economy. The ultimate goal of Communism is Socialism and where everyone has the same amount of money, social status, and materials. Remember, the ultimate goal. I have shown the many flaws and logic failures in your argument. Your turn.