Evolution is the most sensible model for the development of life

Firstly I would like start with rebutting some of the opponents points. "God is the creator, this is to your question." This is where we disagree; a cell was our creator. We eventually evolved into humans because of a cell. "Not sure where you get the idea of Noah's ark landing in the Middle East from? But okay.. Maybe if that be true, that the kangaroos ventured off to the other country. What's wrong with that?"Australia was not connected to a landmass (at least in the last 6,000 years) at the time when Kangaroos were supposedly to have evolved. Kangaroo fossils were allegedly found in many places, but recent discoveries show that all Kangaroo fossils found outside of Australia has been a case of mistaken identity. Nevertheless, kangaroos may have attempted their diaspora to Australia, but this theory is faced with two serious challenges. As I have stated, there are no landbridges connecting Australia to any bigger landmass. But at the same time, if there was, then we should find fossils in South East Asia, which is definitely not the case. Kangaroo fossils are only found in Australia because they only existed there; there is no other explanation. So if Noah, his family, and the many other species of animals got on a boat and landed in some place of the world, Kangaroos suddenly existed in Australia. "Plate tectonics is a nice analogy, however it doesn't exactly prove that evolution is the cause for that. Everything around us is alive. Water, trees, animals, people, insects, the earth, the atmosphere. That cannot be by conincidence of some evolution form? It does not add together. There has to be something that created it and the only explanation would be is God."My point is that plate tectonic show that the earth is older than 6,000 years old. Also, the concept that God produced hundreds of thousands of species in six days is really quite astonishing; how come God was unable to help us, when bombs were falling upon his children? How come God was unable to help us, when poverty took over our lands? How come God, whose power was so powerful, is unable to help us in times of trouble? If God's grace is so large, and He is so kind to us, why hasn't He shown Himself to us? On a more scientific-evolutionary based note, if God truly created us, then why do we have such a similar DNA with a Chimpanzee? Then why do we have a 50-60% similar DNA to the simplest form of living things on earth, single-cell bacterias? Clearly, evolution gave us our current DNA strands, and we should embrace that."How do you explain the most simplest thing as the pupil of a persons eyes? Every little detail of it is gloriously magnificent. How would evolution create such beauty? What would be the purpose of life if everything was revolved or evolved into existence?"Ok then. I will now explain the pupil of a persons eye. Firstly, there was a bacteria, who eventually evovled into a reptile, then to a mamal, then into an ape, then into a human. So our "super super great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great...(the list goes on and on)" Grandmothers and Grandfathers were single cell bacterias. Evolution creates this beauty because it makes the lifeform more complex; it is also a slow process. For example, a chimp might be tall, and another chimp may have blue eyes. When both chimps reproduce, their babies would have more or less the characteristics of their parents, and some new characteristics. That is how evolution happen. How do we know that is true?An experiment on Silver Foxes were performed; 130 Silver Foxes were taken from their lair. However, only the friendliest were allowed to breed. Scientists observed that by the tenth generation, 20% of these foxes became tame and friendly. By the 8th to 10th Generation, these foxes started developing spots. What does this show? This shows that the common understanding of human evolution has been seen in action. With proof in front of your eyes, evolution has been shown to be true.Evolution is a very rational and sensible model of the creation of life because it is supported by the tectonic plates theory, which shows that the earth is very old. It is also supported by the ages of trees, and the similarity between our DNAs and other animal's DNAs, and the existence of "Ring Species". I would like to thank the opponent for giving me this opportunity to debate, and I hoped she did enjoy it as much as I did. I wish her the best of luck in the next arguments and future debates. Vote Pro!Citations: http://en.wikipedia.org...http://scienceblogs.com...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.the-scientist.com...