God most likely exists

You say that the big bang must have had a "banger". Well you're right. There are a few theories about this. Scientists have discovered that there may be universes inside of other black holes, so our own universe may be inside a black hole, which may be where the materials that caused the big bang came from (http://news.nationalgeographic.com...). But what about god? Where did god come from? He had to come from somewhere? So where? You describe evolution as "a silly theory", when in reality, you believe that an all knowing and all powerful being created the universe in seven days, if that isn't silly I don't know what is. And in rebuttal to your silly "That's what science is based on, observations! And what do we see?", we have indeed observed genes evolving from mutated genes(http://www.scientificamerican.com...). On your argument about organisms losing information from their DNA, mutations aren't always losses in code, they can also be extras in code, and as modern science, people with Ph.D's, has concluded, this has caused evolution. On your fourth paragraph, I don't know how you could possibly convey that as something else, but I was simply stating what you were saying so that I could disprove it with actual theories that are supported by evidence. I guess that shows the mental capabilities of someone who believes a giant man in the sky created the wold. Ok, so the bible was, according to pro, written by judges (who, back then, were mostly religiously biased) , farmers, fishermen, kings (who back in that day and age were mostly tyrants who treated their subjects like garbage), and prophets (who likely weren't prophets, as evidence clearly suggests that god does not exist). These are all men who were less that qualified to write a book on the creation of the universe. On the Earth becoming a garden paradise, I don't know what Earth you're living on. The ice caps are melting (the result of climate change), more than 1 billion people around the world living on less than a dollar a day, wars going on around the world, many caused by religion, may I add, killing innocent people. First of all, I don't know what kind of god would let things like that go on in the world, second of all, it is naive to think that a god will come and save us one day from all the things we have destroyed, including the earth. I don't know what world you're coming from where the Bible is scientifically accurate. I do appreciate that you have come up with a few examples in which the Bible was scientifically accurate, one of which was innaccurate: "And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH (Isaiah 11:12)", on top of that, I'm sure I can come up with some examples in which it wasn't so scientifically accurate. It is scientifically impossible for a woman to be impregnated without sperm to fertilize her egg, it is also impossible for two of every animal to be stuffed on a wooden boat for forty days, where there was probably a lack of food, and if the water surrounding them was salt water, then also a lack of water, and survive. Oh, and did I mention that there was a talking snake? Trying to claim that the Bible was scientifically accurate is like trying to claim that being gay is a choice, christians say it is, but it's not. And on the Bible being historically accurate, just because you give names and locations, it doesn't make it true. Does pro know what else has specific locations and ancestry? A Song of Ice and Fire, Harry Potter, and The Hunger Games. They are all just books. Fictional books. So I assume, according to pro, stating faults in your own country makes you correct. So here: I recognize that America's government is corrupt and dishonest a lot of the time. Does that make me correct? It is extremely unprofessional to try to claim that the Bible is an honest book by telling me that it is "the book from god" in a debate about whether god exists or not. Isaiah did not, in fact, say that the city of Babylon would be destroyed, it stated that god would take it over. I don't think saying you'll do something and then doing it counts as a prophecy. In fact, I was lying in bed the other day, and I said: "I'm going to get up and get some water", and guess what? I got up and went to get some water. I don't think that counts as a prophecy. About the Bible predicting Cyrus the Great overthrowing Babylonia, it is uncertain when it was written, but definitely wasn't written 200 years before Cyrus. In fact, was most likely written during Cyrus's rule, or when he was about to win the war to overthrow Babylonia. Again, about Earth becoming a paradise, it is beyond naive to just rely on god to come through for everyone and make everything all happy and care free. That's not how the world works, we clean up our own messes, we find a new planet, or we die out. Relying on a fictional book to save us from our own corruption is the mentality that got us here in the first place. Regarding the statement of yours that claims that "He (Jehovah) knows what pathways we should avoid" and the part about the Bible's principles, the Bible claimed that being gay is a sin. Since then, it has caused countless suicides, depression, and estrangement of children from their families, and it has been scientifically proven that being gay is not a choice and therefor, just as normal as being straight. I don't think that necessarily shows that the Bible should tell people how to live their lives. Saying "What more evidence do you need? God's power is right there in the Bible! I cannot ignore the many fulfilled prophecies and science discovered at a later date, and neither should you or ANYONE who cares about the TRUTH." is ridiculous. There are no prophecies that had been legitimately fulfilled in the Bible, there have been no scientific discoveries made by the Bible, and there is little to no "truth" in the Bible. If you want truth, go read a textbook that wasn't written in 1910. Concerning your argument on inbreeding, it is true that we all have a common ancestor, but that doesn't lead to genetic mutations unless the two people who are breeding are closely related. This is proven by SCIENCE. Regarding your argument that states "If God exists, he could have sent Jesus to the womb of Mary, no sperm necessary. SO, that's an invalid argument as well", you can't use "god did it" as a legitimate argument. You can't sat that god caused something in a debate about whether god exists or not. It's the second time you've done this, and quite frankly, it's ridiculous. Again, evolution is not a "silly theory", it has concrete evidence to back it up, while the Bible does not. Besides, you used a winky face in a formal debate, spelled "Nobel" wrong, and didn't even capitalize it. I will patiently await Pro's response, and hope it comes soon. Thank You.