JESUS IS LORD (and other discrepancies between Christianity and Islam)

Before any thing i am going to put the true definition of prophet. Its not the prophet responsibility to die for the sin of all humans of universe. Also than what would be the purpose of world. Every human is suppose to test here. The world should be ended at that very time. Because ALLAH know who is going to do sin and who is going to do good. And Jesus died for your sin. Which you also admitted is for salvation and what definition i gave for salvation you interpret it same way and more clear. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://dictionary.cambridge.org... http://oxforddictionaries.com... "Matthew. Luke and john. again. Not under the supervision of Jesus. "Mark again disciple. Not Jesus himself or under the supervision of Jesus. Which already have been discussed and also you wasted the time for this the source i presented already mention all of this. Again you never replied what i was asking. How could they be authentic the prophet could be. Luke This most unacceptable as the grandson of disciple. And also the historian. Its not history is religion. There must be prophet and historian both there or a writer. All above believe but do not prove. And the church held. In the books where it is mention that ALLAH or you call him GOD is taking responsibility for the preserver of these books. he was eye witness of Jesus life. Not the anjeel or bible. Bible was revealed on Jesus not on them also. Did Jesus shared all bible to them. Indeed the Qur'an was learn by heart by our prophet and there were many other companion of prophet who did this and at last sermon he read Qur'an twice in front of one hundred and fourteen thousand Muslims. I am not saying all were hearing his voice but they were there and he mention who who know tell others. Even if it is only a verse. No doubt the first copy of Qur'an is preserved until now. Thanks to ALLAH. Bible was not written in the time of Jesus. How could a person the write difficult words of GOD and can remember for such long time. Indeed they wrote, despite it was not 100 but 50 to 60 i could say that. Which means they would be young at the time of Jesus but old at the time of writing. The old man any way do not have good memory. John as i already put evidence in this regard if you have read i don't know. That all believe that we don't know was john a prophet or disciple. "They wrote all this more than 100 years after Jesus." - more like "between 58 - 68 A.D.." http://newsletters.cephasministry.com...... s this news letter much authentic or this. http://en.wikipedia.org... i was write as i wrote above i saw a debate where they mention it was written 100 year after Jesus. Now i am providing the authentic source. And the source i provided is more authentic. With better citation and with more reference. Every body know Wikipedia. "These 3 person do not have the credibility of prophet." again the con argue with me here about this statement. I am going to put light on this statement. If they are credible than they should not had contradiction even with there own statement. (Bible vs bible) I am putting it here. http://atheism.about.com... thanks to atheists. http://www.thethinkingatheist.com... "Is bible 100% authentic." http://wiki.answers.com... - Yes, God is powerful enough to oversee it's existence. GOD or catholic church. "was it not suicide to go to the Jerusalem." - not suicide, but mercy, the lord demonstrated his mercy to us. "God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:8 This GOD deserve more mercy than showing mercy to us. Was this not more mean than mercy. He died so that we admire him until the day of judgement. Was is not a show off. Just like in Hindu religion or some old African religion. They torture themselves for the sake of gods. That always happened in mythology. http://oxforddictionaries.com... a great quote by Muhammad D Makhdoom. (which is me) " you only have faith, but fortunately we have faith as well as logic.) our religion is nature. anything unnatural than its not Islam. "Jesus did not "lose" anything, he was raised on the third day according to the scriptures. conquering sin and death" If he was raised 3rd day than what he did on 3rd day why he never gave any statement that he was crucified and raised again. Why he left it doubt full. And why he never killed those Jews. One more important question. If he died for the sin of us than he should have not been crucified by the human. Human killed him and again human was rewarded salvation. This do not make any sense. Also what happened to those Jews it was also their sin to crucify Jesus. Was there sin also be forgiven. If than was it not preplanned or cheating to ALLAH. That hew will kill Jesus. And Jesus will become hero and the human will worship him and the Jews who killed him will also be forgiven. If this is not the real interpretation. Than what it mean Jesus died for the sin of human. Which you gave above. You said we were sinner and he died for us. Not you actually but it was verse from roman. "This is ignorant of the actual christian perspective. No true follower of Jesus thinks this way" Than why you not explain salvation. Its not about thinking but reality. And how can you tell about the thinking of billions of christian. Just i cant tell the thinking of billion of Muslims. That is the reason there are some terrorist hired for this purpose. And indeed among you are also "How could a lord be treated like this." Exactly, this is the ultimate display of humility, unmatched in all the universe. God condescended to display His attributes to men. In Jesus. Oh really. Was it sacrifice. For this all other prophet was using sheep or camels. See the Abraham or Moses. http://www.merriam-webster.com... also was this not attribute (unjust). How could be ALLAH( GOD) unjust only for Jesus. I think for all other prophet only prayer was enough to get any thing. Indeed salvation is not big deal. Why he suppose to die. That do not make any sense. "In our Qur'an the Jesus was not crucified." You can not interpret the scriptures without this exact 'lens' to look through. without this lens of the crucifixion of Jesus you will only get a fuzzy picture of the holographic story contained in the compilation of the bible. Indeed, If crucifixion is proved wrong the whole bible is proved wrong. Which show the people with there eye saw other man in the appearance of Jesus. They are force to write it in this way. from who did Mohammad receive the Qur'an? An angel? Who told you only angel. He was also having direct revelation form ALLAH. But it was more painful. "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." Galatians 1:8 our prophet never been cursed but was always rewarded. See in the world. And his life too. "Mohammad himself first thought it was a demon whom gave him this gospel," Don't make false statement. And presenting it with out evidence it is so much wrong. After ward all was not concerning. Bible is contradictory, unpure, wrong, written by men not prophet, even not under the supervision of prophet. And even you can not prove crucifixion in any way. But faith. And you talked about the blood and DNA. Actually its normal. X from female and y come from male, it could be x.But if than she give birth to a girl. Any body know merry do not have any relation with man. In Jesus blood there must not be y chromosome. But some kind of other thing to make him male. Which can prove it miracle. Other wise it would be a normal birth. Which also proves that he was not Jesus. Thanks for giving me another argument. Indeed i know more than you about embryology.