Omnipotence is logically unachivable, thus God can't be omnipotent

I personally don't believe in God, because (among other things) using logic, omnipotence falls apart. Let's begin by trying to cover most definitions of omnipotence: -Absolute omnipotence: The ability to do anything even beyond the limits possibility. -Logical omnipotence: The ability to do anything within the limits of logic. -Natural omnipotence: The ability to do anything that doesn't contradict your "natural essence" Let's tackle them one at a time to logically disprove them. First let's talk about absolute omnipotence. I think this falls apart rather quickly, and that's why almost nobody thinks of omnipotence as absolute. If we follow the definition, we reach the conclusion that this being would be able to create a son that never had parents. This is completetely imposible not just because it is creating an enviroment beyond logic (what the definition states it can do), but also because it goes aganist the definitions of te words themselves. The word son denotes that it MUST have parents. So this definition is just imposible without manipulating the meaning of the words. Now let's talk about logical omnipotence. Since a logically omnipotent being can do anything that we can imagine within the boundaries of logic let's think of this: I am in the countryside and I decide to make a pile of rocks in the middle of the fields that I'm standing on. I create a small pile of finite rocks that I can lift, so I keep adding rocks. At the end I create a pile so big that I'm not able to lift it (But it's still finite). Since I was able to logically create this scenario, God should be able to accomplish the same thing that I just did. But then we reach a problem, if God can create the pile that he can't lift, then he wouldn't be omnipotent, because he cannot lift this finite amount of rocks. If he is able to lift the rocks, then he wouldn't be able to create a pile of rocks that he can't lift, which would prove that he isn't omnipotent. Also, if we focus on the Christian God, then we can find more contradictions aganist the logically omnipotent being. Since in Hebrews 6:18 and in Titus 1:2 the Bible states that God can't lie and I can imagine a God lying, we also reach the conclusion that this God is not logically omnipotent. Some may argue: "But lying is aganist God's honest nature" and there's when the third definition kicks in. "God is a natural omnipotent being because he can do anything that doesn't violate his natural essence". I personally think this claim is totally ridiculous, because, if we think that an omnipotent being is a creature that can do anything that doesn't go aganist his nature, then every creature in the entire univerese is omnipotent! If we follow that logic it would mean that I am omnipotent because I can do anything, but if someone asks me to fly or lift a 1000000 kilograms, I could simply reply with: "Flying and lifting so much weight is not part of my nature becase I'm a being limited by his muscular size and shape" Finally, after disproving logically the concept of omnipotence, we reach the conclusion: If a God exists it isn't omnipotent and is completely limited.