Ron Paul is the best candidate for president

Returning troops to the USA from overseas would most definitely be beneficial. We save our troops lives, we save ourselves money to better economically develop ourselves, the 'world power" (UN) would be forced to act, we would be recognized in the world as a needed country towards keeping the peace. Which would be then turned over to the UN. I can GUARANTEE you that Ron Paul could NOT be hated more than 'W'. W is a horrible president and should be impeached (even though it's a little late now). Countries would recognize us keeping the peace if we withdrew because the violence in the world would indefinitely escalate for a period of time until the UN figured out what to do. No matter how much you want to believe that we are the worlds police, we aren't. In case you haven't noticed by now, the UN (a combined world power) should step into our foreign affairs. The UN has NOT stepped into any affairs lately, you are completely correct on that statement. However, they do not step in, because they KNOW that we will! They would not be so slow-moving if they knew they were the ones keeping order in the world. Now, when you say, "Why should we make them do [step into our foreign affairs] when we are capable? Why should we, to use an example from history, let the British and French defend themselves from the Nazis when the fate of the free world is at stake?," I think you are looking at the picture from an angle instead of straight on like most people would look at the picture. You are comparing WWII to the Iraq war (which you may or may not believe is part of the war on terror). WWII and the Iraq war are two completely different things. WWII: -fate of the world depended on defeating the Nazis Iraq War: -fate of world does NOT depend on defeating Al-Queda, in fact, Al-Queda even warned us of 9-11 before they attacked! they told us to get off of the Arabian Peninsula, and we did not. So they blew up one of our naval ships in the Arabian Sea. They warned us again, and we did not comply, so they attacked on 9-11. The motive behind 9-11 was our fault. I am BY NO MEANS, saying that we were responsible for Al-Quedas actions, but we WERE the motive behind them. You claim that Al-Queda will destroy us, ("In all honesty, that would have destroyed us") when they won't, they want the US out of the Middle East, and so do the American People. So what is making it so difficult to accomplish this task? They wont destroy the US, because they won't have any motivation to do anything. Military isolationist? maybe, but when you waste money on inefficient wars, projects, and other things, it does NOT help anyone. Ron Paul would surely bring all troops home because us fighting where we shouldn't be, is unnecessary and illogical. it is unnecessary because we don't have ANY motivation for being there or fighting for what we think we should be doing, and it is illogical because we are wasting our own resources to accomplish basically nothing. Ron Paul does NOT have a "hatred for government". He believes in our constitution, which, in the 10th amendment, states, "all rights not granted to the federal government shall be granted to the states". I don't see how that is a "hatred for government". There is my defense for this debate. Matt