In order to reduce unemployment and increase GDP, counterfieters should not be prosecuted

My opponent goes on to explain the problems with GDP. I agree with everything CON states. However, it is not my opponent's burden of proof to show that there are problems with measuring GDP. My burden is to show that counterfeiting will increase GDP in the short run. I stated in the first round that It is CON's burden to disprove otherwise. I showed how counterfeiting increases GDP. CON does not disagree that counterfeiting will increase GDP in the short run, only that using GDP to measure wealth is flawed. That's not the point. Any attempts to discredit the GDP i futile. My opponent can only discredit that GDP will not increase as a result of counterfeiting. My opponent response to the argument that businesses will keep prices low even with an increase in the money supply. The response is: "Source? Prices do not matter. Have had bunch of candy? Yes? Would you be most likely to say ah "I got so much candy I think I make art.". The money value drops becoming a little worthless. So what? What about those who didn't print. Do you know what happens when theres a blast of money in a nation." To be quite honest, I don't know what my opponent is stating. I already stated previously that prices will not double if the money supply doubles. My opponent agrees that prices are sticky. I agree that the value of the dollar will decrease with an increase in the money supply. This is obvious, but it is not an argument that counterfeiting decreases unemployment or GDP. My opponent states that the Philips Curve is outdated. The equations used in the Philips Curve is outdated in the sense that one cannot simply inflate the money supply by (X) and expect unemployment to decrease by (Y). There's a new equation used for the Philips Curve that does not use empirical evidence. It's more complex and it's not necessary to go over the equations. The main criticism of the Philips Curve was from Milton Friedman. He stated that firms and people would have a rational expectations of how much inflation would occur. As a result people would adjust there behavior accordingly and therefore the ability to reduce unemployment via inflation would have a dampening effect. This was partially proven true via stagflation. However, it should also be noted that using inflation to reduce unemployment is still a commonly used. It should also be noted that rational expectations is not completely true. Behavior economics has shown in experiments that humans have systematic biases in economic behavior. As I explained earlier, experiments have shown that workers would see a 2% pay increase with 4% increase in inflation as fair, while a 2% pay decrease with no inflation as unfair. This is irrational since the two scenarios leave the worker with the same salary. This is one reason why inflation works to reduce unemployment. I've already explained that an increase in GDP due to inflation reduces unemployment since employers need to hire more people to satisfy consumption. If I print money and hire a servant, I have just reduced the unemployment count by one. The servant also then has money to pay for other products, which increases employment for them, and so forth. This effect is know as the Keynesian multiplier[1]. My burden is to show that counterfeiters increases the GDP and reduces uenmployment. I have proven both of these statements. CON's main arguments are red herring that do not disprove the resolution. http://en.wikipedia.org...[1]