Abortion

Pro failed to understand “rights” come from the physical constructal law and not from government. I should have composed 4 paragraphs, not “3. ” The links I supplied describes life's “unalienable Rights” are an animate interpretation of the constructal law; therefore, at conception the human entity has “unalienable Rights. ” To be fair, many are under the illusion government gives rights. The Bill of Rights in the US Constitution gave us no rights at all, it is a set of instructions to the institution of government to protect the individual's “unalienable Rights. ” This is a common problem, in general, our government controlled schools (aka public schools and colleges) are not required to have courses on Constitutional study. Why? But I digress, since the US ruling-class in DC became unmoored from the US Constitution, it behaves like most governments imposing tyrannical laws interfering with the individual's “unalienable Rights,” tyrannical laws preventing the market to be free; in fact, there are so many laws on the books the average citizen commits three felonies a day (. http://www.amazon.com...). In other words, there are so many lawyers looking for business, you bring them the man, they'll find you the crime. The less laws the more freedom we have. For example, at one time the tyranny of government prevented women from having an abortion. A segment of the population convinced the masterminds in government to abolish that tyrannical law resulting in freedom for women to have an abortion option. If they want to have an abortion, is a choice they have to live with. However, the DC masterminds turned around and contrive a set of tyrannical laws forcing me to pay for said abortions. This is the problem! I do not support genocide of which Pro has no problem with as Pro stated, “… poor people SHOULD have abortions over children because they cannot afford to support children. ” There are a lot of poor people who have families, and the ones I know, seem happier than most of the rich families I know. I'm not one to judge, however, at this point in our debate, I'm beginning to feel sorry for Pro having such an immoral mindset supporting genocide. On the other hand, I do agree with Pro's statement, “Ah, but on the contrary, making ME pay for babies that YOU cannot afford to support is disgusting. ” BINGO! Having the tyranny of government to enslave me, or Pro, to work for others is simply bondage. One would think we have abolish slavery, but over the last hundred years DC morphed into a modern day plantation. Most who have a job, are enslaved to the government working almost a half a year to pay all their taxes, including those abortions. At the turn of last century millions of immigrants, most poor, were coming to the US for freedom. There were few laws, DC was following the Constitution embracing and protecting the individual's “unalienable Rights. ” There were no government run welfare or social programs. If you can't find a job it was easy to start your own business in a free market; otherwise, you starve or seek help from charity. Those “poor people” showed all the tyrannical governments what freedom can do, in a short period of time, advancing technology, food production, and medicine changing the world like no other social system in recorded history. Pro said, “The fetus needs the body of the mother to survive. ” Well that's obvious, sex education 101. Then Pro when on some rant about “human A needs a part of human B to survive. ” What's up with that? What does that have to do with the tyranny of government forcing me to pay for abortions? Perhaps, Pro wants more tyranny from government to enslave a dead body and chop it up to keep others alive. I would not be surprised one day that will happen. Then Pro when on with more fetus bio-info.