Gravity Does Not Exist

As my opponent has forfeited his refusals I will just continue with some extra knowledge and facts that cannot be explained through Gravity but are yet explained by what I have proposed. Firstly: Explain how Gravity pulls things. Not what the constant of the gravitational force is, not the math that shows the bigger the object the more gravity it has, but explain why exactly Gravity pulls things. Secondly, Gravity is not even a real force if you follow the General Relativity theory, this states that Gravity is the bending of spacetime around an object. So this would also mean the closer you get to an object the more time begins to bend, however even if space was to bend, this does not explain a constant pull. Again why is gravity always pulling? Quote from UCSB Science: "Gravity is a force between two objects with mass. It pulls things together. You have mass, and the Earth has mass, so gravity tries to pull you and the Earth together. The gravitational force is much bigger for more massive objects. The Earth has a lot of mass, which is why it can hold you down. You can't feel the gravity attracting you to smaller objects, like your house or other people. That's because these things aren't anywhere near as massive as the entire Earth. OK, so you know what gravity is. But how does it actually pull stuff together? Actually, scientists aren't sure. There is a theory that gravity is made up of little particles called gravitons, just like light is made up of little particles called photons. But we've never seen a graviton! So we're not actually sure they exist." Blatantly there is no explanation. However what I have offered explains a How to why things go down or up. Following the Law of Conservation and Mass nothing can be destroyed nor created, hence when pushed it will have to go somewhere, that somewhere will be wherever there is enough room or less dense area because it has to fit somehow. This is why the least dense objects go above and the more dense objects go below. However Gravity as stated before has no explanation as to WHY it pulls us. One person I have talked to tried to describe Gravity's pull by saying that the closer you get the steeper the space-time bends. However the flaw of this is that what would happen if you stayed still? If you didnt move closer to the steep, but just stayed still. There is no reason as to why Gravity would pull us. Hence by this logic anything that isnt getting closer to Earth would not be pulled. Like when we jump, we would be getting further from the bend of space time and this would actually make us appear farther from the Earth than we really were. But that is not what we see. Hence there is no reason to think Gravity exist if you can't explain why it pulls. Thirdly, an Example of a contradiction in logic of believing in Gravity. I mean the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy was developed because no one could give an example or explanation of how to create or destroy an object that couldnt be explained by other means such state changes and objects becoming less dense or smaller, so why can we assume Gravity exist when you cannot give an accurate Example or Reason as to why it pulls? I have already explained how everything in the Solar System can work using what I have proposed, and given logical reason as to why it works, however there is no logical reason in believing that Gravity exist. So by the same logic that developed the Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy we can assume that Gravity does not exist is also a law of physics. Fourthly, Want me to explain General Relativity without Gravity? Time = Distance\Speed, Distance = Speed x Time. Speed = Distance\Time. A simple equation and fact anyone can test. This is why we see the past of stars, because the distance is so great and the speed light travels at, leaves us seeing a certain time of the Star from the past, nothing to do with Gravity. It is simple, set a destination, drive at a constant speed, and you can calculate the Time it will take. It has nothing to do with Gravity, if it did that would be apart of the equation. Fifthly, Who am I to say that Gravity doesn't exist? I am just another person like you or Einstein. He was mostly self taught and his own theories were crazy as mine seem today, just as Copernicus sounded insane when hundreds of other popular scholars of his time disagreed and had the math for it, I also have the math but mine explains everything better. So yes, if you can except Copernicus and Einstein who questioned the famous and intelligent scientist of their day, then you can also believe in me. Six, people may say Gravity pulls due to a "graviton" a particle never seen before and 100% theory. It is also described as a Non zero mass particle like Photon and thought to move at light speed. Think about that for a second. If Gravity can only effect things up to the point of Light Speed, then it should not be able to pull light. The force of light going one way and the pull of the graviton would cancel out and you should see light just floating there and not moving in any direction. In a sense you wouldnt see it because the light would never reach your eyes. Seven, if you want to discredit my Energy Density theory, know that Gravition also depend on the energy density in vacuums. (Also apart of the theory of Gravitons is that they become less dense when two objects move closer and somehow pull more) This document has many things about Gravity and math, however I have shown why and how these can be explained otherwise. Eight, Think about this for a second. It is a quote from PBS.Org: "So why hasn"t anyone found a graviton yet? The problem with searching for gravitons is that gravity is incredibly weak. For instance, the electromagnetic force between an electron and a proton in a hydrogen atom is 1039 times larger than the gravitational force between the same two particles. Perhaps a more intuitive example is the behavior of a magnet and a paperclip. A magnet will hold a paperclip against the Earth"s gravity. Think about what that means. A little magnet, like the one that held your art to your parent"s refrigerator when you were a kid, pulls the paperclip upwards, while the gravity of an entire planet pulls downward, and the magnet wins" Look at the flaw in logic this statement reveals, On Earth where gravity should be soooooo much stronger than the pull it has on the Moon a single magnet can defy it. Meaning a single magnet has the strength to keep the moon in orbit? Or how about this fun fact, The Earth's gravity is 1\4 of its power once you reach 6,000 km. The moon is 384,400 KM from Earth. EARTH WOULD HAVE NEXT TO ZERO PULL ON THE MOON! So how does it stay in orbit if the current gravity on Earth is weaker than a common magnet? How does the Moon which is 4 times less the mass of Earth pulling the Earth's oceans from 384,400 km which not even the Earth has that kinda pull power. Yet they say it is Gravity pulling the moon all the time. The pull of a magnet is atleast 1039 times stronger than the Earth.... Yeah.... Ninth, You want to ask me how a magnet can defy the Buoyancy effect I have proposed? Simple, we all know that the denser the object the more magnetism required to pull it. It is a tug of war, can a magnet pull a metal cannon ball? No because the metal is so dense, however it can pull a paperclip because the metal is not dense. If it was up to gravity, Gravity would effect everything equally and the magnet should be able to pull Giant Metal structures because it is 1039 times stronger than the pull that is managing to keep the object down. A support for Gravity would be people saying that the metal is pulling the Earth too so that is why a magnet can't pull it, however that same pull should also pull towards the magnet meaning it would cancel out and you would just have gravity vs magnetism. Which Magnetism wins according to their own logic, they require gravity to be the weakest force. As you can see with my density proposal it all fits. Tenth, I will also explain how Gravity the theory is a mistaken idea for fact. I have proposed to you all how Density and Buoyancy can fit in the world we live and explained how it would work. Gravity has no explanation for pull but when you search for information you find that they say Gravity and weight is increased by the amount of density, like Black Holes have the strongest pull because they are infinitely dense. However the density factor just adds more to my theory because I can explain why it being more dense effects other objects at it does, when Gravity cannot, it just states that dense things pull others. Eleventh, I am kind of running low on things to think about as I have addressed every factor of gravity and shown how it can be proven otherwise. There are usually two different types of people who believe in Gravity. First Group thinks that Gravity goes on forever and affects everything, this is needed for the idea of gravity pulling the Moon or why it doesnt get easier to go through the atmosphere the higher you go, or the fact that air at the upper part of our atmosphere doesnt just zoom off of Earth. Second Group think that gravity is limited and only goes so far, this is needed to explain why in Space there is no gravitional pull towards Earth, or why the Asteroid Belt hasnt formed into a big massive ball as earlier discussed by Con. However these two needed ideas for Gravity are both contradictory in this Theory. However in my Buoyancy Theory and how Density affects what rises, falls, or moves side to side or diagonally, this all fits with Zero Contradictions. Sources: http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu... http://www.pbs.org... http://arxiv.org... http://www.space.com... That's all for now folks, Have a good one!