All Ginger Kids/Adults should be killed.

Hello again. Before I start the 2nd construct of this debate I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate challenge and representing all the cruel, racist people who would see all the ginger kids in the world put to death. You have quite a job to accomplish because you have to not only prove your side correct, but you also have to disregard all our morals, and codes of ethics, so, I wish you luck. You will, undoubtedly, need it. My opponent's first point was one that, because our world is overpopulated, the killing of all the Gingers would be just. He then justified this claim by saying that overpopulation could lead to death for us all and since there was no specified time of death for the gingers he would allow nature to run it's course. This blatant revision of the topic would work if the topic was worded differently, but as the topic says killed, and the Webster dictionary defines Killed as, "To inflict or to cause death", you cannot claim that "killed" applies to all death in the world, because not all death is inflicted by something. For example, if someone lives to be 100, their heart would be very weak, and may give out spontaneously, this is neither inflicted maliciously or naturally, and for that matter, suicide, homicide, drug overdoses, and many other things that cause death neither maliciously or naturally, so my opponent's defense just cannot hold ground in this debate. Now onto my next point. When someone sees the topic "All ginger kids/adults should be killed, they think not of any ridiculous reason my opponent has brought up, but of reasons like: It would be unjust to kill the gingers, ginger's like Thomas Jefferson live on to do great things, and the killing of them would prevent more great people from contributing to society, or killing is immoral, and the intentional killing of anyone is never good. My opponent has failed to address these reasons for fear of alienating you as judges, but as I said in my first construct, I want someone to challenge this debate who can defend the bigoted sector of society who would want us as ginger's dead. LogicalMaster has accepted this debate, so he obviously fits under this category, so why is he not bringing up any points directly pertaining to this topic? Luckily it is only the 2nd round and he has plenty of time to bring up points, so I urge him to do so. Now, onto a point of my own. All the gingers should be killed. This statement strikes up anger not only in myself, as a ginger, but I am sure that it would strike up anger in any civilized person who has any sliver of humanity left in them. The killing of anyone is wrong! So why would it be okay to kill the red haired people. Just like in Nazi Germany, what started out with some prejudice towards the Jewish and Gay sectors of society soon escalated into a totalitarian dictatorship that oppressed not only the Jewish by putting them into internment camps and killing them, but the gay, Muslim, and almost every other person who was "different" along with the Jewish, Leaving Germany, all white, and all Christian. Today, there are some people in America whom would see the same fate for the Gingers. In South Park, they illustrated that fear, first by mocking the gingers, and then by segregating the cafeteria into ginger, and non-ginger areas. Remind you of anything? If we go so far as to kill the ginger's like the topic dictates my opponent wants to do. Then I say... we are no better than Nazi Germany... Thank You. For reading. I hope you will do the right thing, and vote for the side your morals tell you is correct.