Big Bang + Evolution (Pro) vs. Theism (Con)

Big bang The entire universe existed in a small high-energy state called the singularity that contains all of matter and energy then this singularity exploded during the big bang because the higgs boson broke the symmetry of the singularity [1]. When the big bang happened, the universe exploded and the universe expanded very fast fourteen billion years ago approximately. In the first moments after the Big Bang, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As the universe cooled, conditions became just right to give rise to the building blocks of matter ; the quarks and electrons of which we are all made. A few millionths of a second later, quarks aggregated to produce protons and neutrons. Within minutes, these protons and neutrons combined into nuclei. As the universe continued to expand and cool, things began to happen more slowly. It took 380,000 years for electrons to be trapped in orbits around nuclei, forming the first atoms. [2] [3][4] The gravity of those atoms or the newly created matter formed stars first and then the leftover matter from the sun or other stars formed the planets around it like earth and mercury. Those planets are perfectly round because of gravity and rotating around itself which makes it into a ball shape. [3] [5]. So the universe exploded then the matter formed stars then the leftover matter formed the planets after the formation of stars. Stars are dated to be older than planets so stars come first then planets. [11] Scientific evidence : - Redshift of galaxies. The simplified version of the doppler effect states that things coming your way will have shorter wavelength (blue shift) and that things moving away from you will have a longer wavelength (red shift). [6] Think of the ambulance, as it approaches you, its sound waves become shorter / louder / more audible. However, as it moves away from you, the sound waves becomes longer / less audible. The same effect happens with light. Astronomers have found that the further from us a star is the more its light is red shifted. This tells us that distant galaxies are moving away from us, and that the further a galaxy is the faster it is moving away. Since we cannot assume that we have a special place in the universe this is evidence for a generally expanding universe. It suggests that everything is moving away from everything else. The Big Bang theory says that this expansion started billions of years ago with an explosion. [7] In 1929, Edwin Hubble announced that almost all galaxies appeared to be moving away from us. In fact, he found that the universe was expanding - with all of the galaxies moving away from each other. This phenomenon was observed as a redshift of a galaxy's spectrum. This redshift appeared to be larger for faint, presumably further, galaxies. Hence, the farther a galaxy, the faster it is receding from Earth. The redshift of galaxies has also been confirmed by Nasa. [8] So, if these galaxies are far, far away, are moving very quickly away from us, this suggests that the entire Universe must have been confined in a single point billions of years ago if we were to reverse the expansion process. - CMBR The Cosmic Microwave Background radiation also called the CMB is another line of evidence for the big bang. The CMB is the afterglow of the big bang. It is the residual heat or energy leftover from the intense initial explosion of the big bang. If there was an explosion of matter and energy as violent as the big bang that brought space and time into existence, you would expect to find leftover energy or radiation from that intense violent explosion or expect to find the "afterglow". The CMB is exactly that. [9] The COBE satellite beautifully maps this CMB and shows the afterglow energy of the explosion. [10] The actual diagram is just a display of the predictive power of the big bang Theory. However a brief history of this is empirical evidence is that it was first predicted by Ralph Alpherin 1948 in connection with his research on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis undertaken together with Robert Herman and George Gamow. It was discovered by accident. In 1965 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson at the Bell Telephone Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey. The radiation was acting as a source of excess noise in a radio receiver they were building. Coincidentally, researchers at nearby Princeton University, led by Robert Dicke and including Dave Wilkinson of the WMAP science team, were devising an experiment to find the CMB. When they heard about the Bell Labs result they immediately realized that the CMB had been found. The result was a pair of papers in the Astrophysical Journal (vol. 142 of 1965): one by Penzias and Wilson detailing the observations, and one by Dicke, Peebles, Roll, and Wilkinson giving the cosmological interpretation. The Big Bang theory predicts that the early universe was a very hot place with plenty of violent energy and heat leftover from the explosion of the big bang. As the universe expands, this universal energy within it cools down little by little since it is being applied to a greater area. Thus the universe should be filled with radiation that is literally the remnant heat left over from the Big Bang, called the "cosmic microwave background". [12] - Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and abundance of primordial elements. In the earliest moments after the Big Bang, there was nothing more than hydrogen compressed into a tiny volume, with crazy high heat and pressure. The entire Universe was acting like the core of a star, fusing hydrogen into helium and other elements. This is known as Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. As astronomers look out into the Universe and measure the ratios of hydrogen, helium and other trace elements, they exactly match what you would expect to find if the entire Universe was once a really big star with a lot of energy as predicted by the big bang theory. [2] abiogenesis abiogenesis is the Idea that life can evolve from non-life. This is not in contradiction with the law of bio-genesis. Here is why, the law of biogenesis states that complex multi-cellular life can not evolve from non-life or out of nowhere. abiogenesis states that simple unicellular life could evolve from the inorganic chemistry in non-life. abiogenesis provides a bridge between the evolution of life and the origin of the universe. abiogenesis accounts for how life could evolve from non-life and how life could very easily shift from unicellular organisms to multicellular ones. Evidence The experimental empirical evidence for abiogenesis can be summed up in 5 steps: origin (miller-urey experiment), assemebly (Fox), packaging (Oparin and Haldane), replicating (E.coli experiment), multicellularity (E.coli experiment). Miller urey experiment literally can produce all of life's amino acids from inorganic gases and electric spark (lightning). With different variations of the same experiment, you can get Nucleic acids and all the other monomers including monosacharrides. [13] Fox showed with certain experimental evidence that those monomers could turn to polymers when exposed to heat like on hot clay or hot sand or sea vents. [14] Those polymers were cased in fats to from the first protobionts that could replicate faster than it died [15]. as shown in the E. coli experiment, with enough time, unicellular life will grow enough mutations and form colonies i.e. simple multicellular organisms. [16] https://www.scientificamerican.com... https://www.khanacademy.org... Evolution evolution is the idea that all species build up enough heritable mutations and changes overtime that they eventually will turn into new species. This theory and fact [17] has so much evidence backing it up, you will most likely reject for two reasons, you do not understand it or a 2000 year old book written by Bedouins told you not to follow it. Evidence - Transitional fossils Transitional fossils prove that species evolved from other species overtime. The fossil record will often show a fine and gradual transition from one species into another that empirically demonstrates that some species evolved from others over time Fish to tetrapods -Tiktaalik [18] two hind legs where red box is. red box over less clear leg. - Ichthyostega [19] looks like human legs [20] - Pederpes [21] not as obvious but the legs are off the body in lower end of the spine Reptiles to birds - archaeopteryx [22] - Confuciusornis [23] Primate to humans http://www.talkorigins.org... Explanation of image in comments - Pseudogenes Pseudogenes like w3nta [24] are in the human dna and they give us tails like primates but they are deactivated due to a mutation despite being in our own dna which suggests humans had tails at one point in the past and other primate characteristics in the past. Same with hHaA [25] that gives us hair all over our bodies just like primates but it is deactivated by a mutation and is not used despite being in our dna which reveals that we once in the past did have this trait. - Vestigial Features They are leftover structures and organs from other species that have no function and are sometimes harmful like: - Wisdom teeth in humans - coccyx in humans - pelvic bones in snakes - hind legs in whales - Ostrich wings - atavisms atavisms prove evolution and they are when pseudogenes get activated, they reveal traits we had in the past like fur all over, tails and other primate characteristics. Look at four-year-old Jiaxue from china http://science.howstuffworks.com... He was born with atavisms and he had a tail like primates and he could not walk in an upright posture like primates. https://www.google.ca... There is more evidence later.