Taking in thousands of refugees from middle eastern countries puts American citizens in danger.

The sources I provided do not show any bias, they simply capture on video the behavior and the words of these refugees. It's hard to claim these video providers have a bias when the refugees are literally speaking for themselves. No media outlet is completely without bias, mainstream media is especially guilty of this. Often times the reality of a situation can be obtained from independent journalists that have no one to alter their stories. Today, there are many news stations that have an extremely left bias portraying the police force in America to be inherently racist. The right also has their channels that are bias. This is why it is more important than ever for people to look at the facts and come to their own conclusions, do your own research and don't rely solely on someone else to provide you information. 1. FBI director Comey goes on record speaking out about performing background checks in places there are no systems to check into. The FBI and NSA are the primary agencies responsible for investigating the people that wish to come here from Syria. Below is a quote from director Comey "We can only query against that which we have collected. And so if someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way that would get their identity or their interest reflected in our database, we can query our database until the cows come home, but there will be nothing show up because we have no record of them," End quote FBI counterterrorism expert stating that the US does not have the resources to vet all the refugees and expresses the danger of ISIS using the refugees to infiltrate the US. Counterterrorism expert Sebastian Gorka stating we dont have the resources to properly vet the refugees The House of Representatives passed a bill that would require additional security measures be taken on refugees coming from the middle east but President Obama stated he would veto the bill. The President opposes a bill that would require additional security to ensure American safety. It's important to note that their were 47 Democrats that supported this bill. 31 state governors have stated that they would refuse to accept Syrian refugees but whether or not they have the authority to do so is highly debated. http://www.cnn.com... https://www.numbersusa.com... However it does speak volumes about the stance the majority of the country takes on this issue. These are elected officials whose purpose is to represent the citizens that elected them and ensure their concerns are heard and addressed. There have only been 7 states that openly embrace the position President Obama is planning to take in regards to the refugees. 2. My opponent has a valid point that the US is not within geographical proximity for these people to simply walk into our country in the mass exodus seen in Europe. However in recent years we've already had problems with riots breaking out and causing chaos in cities like Ferguson, Missouri and Baltimore. It is not unreasonable to believe that with the number of refugees Obama plans to bring, it is possible for extremists or members of ISIS to infiltrate and begin to cause the same kind of chaos we've seen in Ferguson, Baltimore, as well as the European nations. Hillary Clinton has stated that she believes the US can do better than 10,000 refugees. She wants to increase the number to 65,000. That is a dramatic increase that only increases the threat of infiltration the FBI has been warning about. That's also 65,000 people living off of American taxdollars. 3. These people have a culture that is drastically different from ours and the result can be seen by anyone in the videos below. Not to say that there are none who could coexist peacefully withour culture because there are. But based on what we've seen there are a dangerously high number of them that cannot peacefully live alongside us. The Muslim Brotherhood has organized a plan to infiltrate the US Muslims declaring Sharia will takeover Europe and America News crew attacked by refugees in Sweden in one of 55 no go zones Refugee crisis in Europe Undoubtedly my opponent will ask you to again ignore the alleged bias of these videos instead of paying attention to what these people are saying and how they are acting. These people are not shy about their beliefs and they are not afraid to use violence as the videos show. In response to my opponents final paragraph. My opponent seems to have some contradictions. On the one hand accusing the videos I linked of having a bias, videos that depict mass chaos at the hands of the refugees. On the other hand my opponent does not deny the explosion of crime that has come with these refugees instead blaming open borders. The fact that the FBI does not have confidence in our ability to vet 10,000 people (let alone the 65,000 Hillary is calling for) should be enough cause for concern to halt anymore from coming to the US. For all we know the refugees causing so much destruction in Europe may not have any ties with terrorism. What if these people don't have any terrorist ties and just behave this way because of their beliefs?