BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Guiliani Is Not Qualified To Be President

I would like to begin with a refresher on the description of the job duties of the president, because I think many people forget the awesome responsibility that this office holds. Wikipedia defines the "U.S. President as the head of state and head of government." What does this mean? First and foremost, the president's role is to enforce national law. Article Two of the Constitution establishes the president as commander-in-chief of the armed forces with which he can declare war and is responsible for all of military actions both offensive and defensive. The constitution also assigns the president the following powers: power to sign into law or veto bills passed by both houses of Congress (which includes taxes, and government spending) , to create a Cabinet of advisors, to grant pardons or reprieves, and, with the "advice and consent" of the Senate, to make treaties, appoint federal officers, ambassadors, and federal judges. As head of state the key responsibility is foreign diplomacy. Based upon the above definition, I believe Rudolph Giuliani has the experience and qualifications necessary to hold the office of President and to be successful at it. For almost 20 years of his career, Giuliani was in the Attorney General's office fighting crime, including a time under Reagan, when he was named Associate Attorney General, which is the third highest position in the Department of Justice. He held the office of Mayor for New York City for two terms, which is all that is permitted by law. While mayor he was successful at lowering crime, reducing taxes while balancing the budget and decreasing the number of citizens on welfare. To top all of that off, he is known and respected both domestically and internationally for stepping in and leading his city to recovery after 911. Time Magazine, a predominately liberal periodical named him Man of the Year, He was knighted by the Queen of England and was presented with the Ronald Reagan Presidential Freedom Award. To sum it up, Giuliani has managed multibillion dollar budgets, thousands of people and departments, understands crime and terror and how to tackle it and has a proven track record of making tough decisions when it matters. I believe this is an outstanding resume for a candidate for the President of the United States and despite whether you agree or disagree with his position on policy, he is more qualified than most of the other candidates to hold the office of President of the United States.
Guiliani Is Not Qualified To Be President

Governor Guiliani is not qualified to be the president,he does not stand for the common folk.I think that he should continue as the governor in order to gain experience. He did not do anything to help the state of New York,when the twin towers fell on 9/11,but took the credit for the rescue efforts. He is for opening the border gates to welcome illegal immigrants which I strongly and violently disagree with due to the fact that they are coming from Mexico and Cuba with out legal documentation.
garlic butter on toast is good

-The greatest and most unfounded form of deep sadness befalls me at the sight of this disappointing turn of events.. Not only once has my opponent failed to bring any form of refuting evidence forward, but a second time as well. Perhaps i was quick to come to such a conclusion on my opponents ability to remain steadfast in the most intense of situations.. I had truly hoped we could continue arguing on this incredible debate topic that undoubtedly half of the beings on this earth would otherwise be unworthy of being even within a three-hundred mile radius of its presence, let alone be able to debate it with such intricacy as my opponent has shown in the first 2 rounds.- -Alas my points still stand and my opponent has yet again failed to refute them because of his absence of time for this website, I fully understand that for him to truly be able to type out all of his evidence in the full clarity and spectacle that he must have only dreamed of showing he would require vasts amounts of space beyond the capacity of these inferior eight-thousand character debating spaces. After all is said and done and the debate comes to a close I feel obligated and truly confident that the audience to be will see clearly through all of the trickery and semantics and see that there is only one vote that can bring an end to this conflict.- -----VOTE PR0oo0000oo----
garlic butter on toast is good

-It is but once in a fleeting lifetime that one comes across such a worthy adversary such as this that takes such vast amounts of his time to put forth such overwhelmingly striking debates such as this. To see such a debater fall short on the premise of something of such insignificance as time is astonishing, I had been looking forward to an overpowering argument from pro that would truly test the mental limits (and stability) of all of its viewers but it appears as though i will have to put aside my hopes for such a retaliation until the fourth round.- -----VOTE PR0oo0000oo----
garlic butter on toast is good

-I show great gratitude for such a swift response and in the fact that my opponent has put forth such a pronounced effort to bring forth such a structured and convincing argument in an attempt to lay waste to the evidence brought forth in round one showing how garlic butter on toast in indeed not "good", but i was stricken with great stupefaction to have stumbled upon some well hidden flaws in the logic of his unquestionably well thought out rebuttal- ----REBUTTAL---- -My opponent claims to require my "number", aside from the fact that his case would gain noting pertaining to the debate topic at hand i will blithely uphold my need to rebut such arguments. My opponent pleads from me a number, but is not very articulate as to what this number would be. Being a student this "number" could coincide with a student number, social security number, credit card number, the numbers chosen on last nights lottery game, phone number even the number associated with my age or birth date. Obviously this question is quite flawed in terms of both detail and relevance within the confines of this debate, I ask of my opponent to be more articulate in his latter retaliations.- -After an egregiously long struggle with understanding my opponents hefty reply i also stumbled upon what appeared to be another irrelevant point! Bewildered even further by the fact that he wants to "send (me) a pic! It's yummy!", I would like to remind my opponent that we are debating a topic of considerable importance and advise him to please refrain from straying from topic. I can only believe that based on this quote my opponent means to say that a picture would be "yummy". Assuming that the "number" my opponent previously asked me for was my phone number.. and that he did indeed send me a picture how would he assume i devour said picture?, let alone find it to have a pleasing taste to go along with it?- -My opponent has failed to provide enough substantial evidence to support his claim that garlic butter on toast is good and has also left the mission of rebutting my previous statements unaccomplished, I can only pray that i will be competent enough to withstand the undoubtedly deep evidence surely saved up for my opponents round three argument to come- -----VOTE PR0oo0000oo----
garlic butter on toast is good

-After reviewing my opponents extensive argument to support his claim that garlic butter on toast is good I have come to the conclusion that the only way to provide any competent rebuttal would be to search through the uncharted lands of the second layer of inner crust of Jupiter's thirty-seventh moon in search of deeply intricate and highly informative evidence to only hope to attempt to formulate a retaliation suitable for such a complicated topic of debate- -----THE EVIDENCE---- -After returning from my arduous journey, involving far to many quelling obstacles for such a simplistic mind such as my own to comprehend, I have found that garlic butter is indeed made of garlic!.. and butter. [1] "A marriage of rich, warm butter and strong, pungent garlic". how can such a substance be counted as good? After opening up a container of diced garlic i was greeted by the most abhorrently gruesome stench that had ever befell my nasal cavities. Even if you were to truly mix this execrable substance with toast, would that truly alleviate the negative factors bestowed upon you by this pungently smelling menace? Not to mention the effects it could have on ones body odor.. After eating large quantities of garlic one could essentially begin to secrete garlic stench from oneself, not a terribly noticeable amount I might add but indeed undesired by most people i would imagine [2].- - One could also possibly find that it is very well conceivable to essentially in a sense "overdose" on garlic. A person who indulges them-self in too much garlic could potentially begin to feel the ailing symptoms of "nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea" on a potentially more extreme note, one could possibly begin to "‘burn' your stomach and digestive tract" with the over ingestion of garlic. Using myself as an example.. I eat vast amounts of toast (shall we say), but i don't fancy the taste of everyday butter found popular amongst some people and instead wish to substitute this with some garlic butter. I am unaware of these "side effects" and over indulge myself with it and am now ill. This is obviously not good and it has involved the indulgence of garlic butter on toast therefore my opponents statement is false- -I await my opponents surely crushing response- -----VOTE PR0oo0000oo---- ---Sources--- [1] http://www.wisegeek.com... [2] http://www.all4naturalhealth.com...
Spinko tourney-Capitalism v. Socialism

Resolved: Capitalism is a superior economic system to socialism.Capitalism is defined by Hans Hermann Hoppe[1] as "a social system based on the explicit recognition of private property and of nonaggressive, contractual exchanges between private property owners"Socialism is defined as "institutionalized interference with or aggression against private property or private property claims."Superior means better than, be it in a moral, economic, or any other context within reason. Round one is for acceptance. Cases are presented in round two.-----------------------Citations: 1. Hoppe, Hans Herman. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Boston: Kluwer, 1989. 10. Print.
The Clippers' Big Three are the best in the league compared to any other current Big Three.

You say that Chris Paul is washed up, but last season he led the league in Steals and ranked 4th in Assists in the league and Ranks 4th in all time. Chris Paul tied for first place in steals in the league last season and leads the league so far this year. Chris Paul has a career average of 18.8 ppg, but this season is at 18.3 ppg, which negates your statement that Chris Paul is washed up. Also, not only have you stated whether Klay or Draymond are in you top three, but you also stated KD and used his stats from last year. But Something that hasn't been accounted for is the fact that the Clippers have the best record in the NBA. Even though their are four stars which as I mentioned before hasn't been clarified which 3 are going to considered in their trio. Blake Griffin hasn't gotten into any disciplinary trouble this year, as this debate is focused on this season and only this season, and Deandre Jordan is shooting free throws above his Career Percentage. Offensively I can say that it is pretty equal, because the Clippers trio have been able to work well together this season so far. Defensively Chris Paul is Number 1 in NBA defensive Rating, while Deandre Jordan and Blake griffin are both in the Top 7, while neither of the four Warriors stars even gain a spot on the Top 20 List.
The Clippers' Big Three are the best in the league compared to any other current Big Three.

Now moving on, you mention the 3 members of the clippers and their various accolades but you are forgetting about the best team in the west and the best team in the league the last 2 years the golden state warriors. The warriors have the MVPs from the last 3 seasons along with either klay thompson or Draymond Green depending who else you want to add to the "Big 3". Steph Curry is the greatest shooter of all time and Kevin Durant is a top 15 scorer of all time, many consider him to be even higher than that. Chris Paul is washed up, Blake Griffin has disciplinary problems and Deandre Jordan is atrocious at the free throw line. Last season Blake scored 21.4 ppg after missing 47 games due to punching a team staff member and breaking his hand, Chris averaged 19.5 ppg and 10 assists and Deandre averaged 12.7 ppg. Steph Curry averaged 30.1 ppg, Klay averaged 22.1 ppg and Durant averaged 28.2 ppg. There is no way that you can say that the Clippers big 3 are better than this team offensively. And as for defensively there are not really a lot of stats that can definitively say that one player is better than another especially considering that all the players other than Curry and Paul play different positions.
The Clippers' Big Three are the best in the league compared to any other current Big Three.

The Clippers big Three Consists of Point-Guard Chris Paul, Power Forward, Blake Griffin, and Center Deandre Jordan. Chris Paul and Deandre Jordan were both selected for the NBA all defensive team as Blake griffin was in eligible as he missed over half of the season. Deandre Jordan also received ALL-NBA First team and Chris Paul was on the Second Team. The Three Altogether Average 49.2 PPG, 14 APG, and 27 RPG, with only 5.2 TPG. Which leads to an average of 2.7 Assist to Turnover Ratio, which would put them at 14th if this was one player, but Chris Paul averaged the second greatest assist to turnover ratio so far this season, and he leads the league in steals. Deandre Jordan almost beat the NBA record with above .7 field goal percentage. This is obviously an extremely good offensive and Defensive trio as long as injuries don't get in the way.
AOW War Scenario: Kazakhstan (pro) vs Afghanistan (con)

January 1 A three day cease fire is signed just in case the treaty doesn't go through. While much of the Afghan administration seems to be present. After hours of negotiations they agree on having it at status quo ante. They only difference is that now Afghanistan is seen as a strong nation for taking on the originally perceived mighty Kazakhstan. Relations between the two counties begin to improve making this actually accomplishing something. This being New Years day now has something else to celebrate. Peace between two nations after a bloody war. Afghanistan makes this as a national holiday. January 3 Afghanistan and Kazakhstan begin major reconstruction. With the new Mi-24 from Russia Afghanistan begins producing them to their best abilities to help defend in future wars. Afghanistan with all these factories being built is creating many jobs which causes unemployment to decrease. January 4 The epic diplomat Mr. Almighty bids farewell to Afghanistan. January 1 (2017) Afghanistan celebrates the 1 year anniversary of peace. Thank you for a good debate my friend. At round 4 initially I thought I may be a bit screwed. You are pretty good, thank you for a great war debate my friend!
AOW War Scenario: Kazakhstan (pro) vs Afghanistan (con)

Thank you for a good debate. December 22nd Kazakh Parliament formally receives the proposed treaty. December 23rd Kazakh Parliament votes 100-97 to accept the treaty, the treaty now ends to the District Representatives. December 25th Kazakh Christians mark Christmas, and encourage both sides with hymns and prayers for both sides. Pope Francis calls for the truce to last longer, or for Kazakhstan to sign the treaty December 26th After many hours of fierce debate, the District Representatives vote 20-18 at 11:34 pm local time to pass the treaty forward to the Prime Minister for final approval and forwarding to the president. December 27th The ceasefire expires and fierce fighting erupts once more. 111 Kazakh soldiers and 69 Afghani soldiers are killed. December 28th The PM of Kazakhstan says the treaty signing will take place in Jalabad, not Kabul and forwards amended treaty to the president December 29th Kazakh troops while waiting for the president's word on the treaty assault the outskirts of Kabul January 1st 2016-On New Year's Day the Kazakh President signals approval of the treaty: Afghani President Ghani will meet him in Jalabad to sign the treaty.
AOW War Scenario: Kazakhstan (pro) vs Afghanistan (con)

Good points and thanks for the debate. November 3rd As the ceasefire holds firm, wounded soldiers begin to heal. Kazakhstan's president pays $5 million in aid to Turkmenistan in support and thanks for letting the Kazakh military pass through peacefully. November 5th The Kazakh military promotes 2 men for bravery to the ranks of Lieutenant and Major. November 7th The war resumes with fierce fighting outside Nuristan in Afghanistan. The objective for Kazakhstan is to surround and seize Kabul, the capital city at some point. Heavy casulaties are sustained: 230 Kazakh and 300 Afghanistan soldiers are killed. 11 tanks are seized by Kazakhstan, and 3 planes of Afghanistan are shot down. November 9th Kazakhstan seizes Nuristan after sustaining 400 deaths and 3 tanks lost. Kazakh president hails the victory and says he is "willing to make peace if the Afghan government surrenders Kabul." It is rejected. November 11th Kazakh troops capture Gardez with no resistance and advance towards Kabul.
AOW War Scenario: Kazakhstan (pro) vs Afghanistan (con)

I thank my worthy friend for the debate :). Let the war continue! September 30th Kazakhstan military increased by 45,000 with military draft instigated, a ceasefire is signed for 1 week to allow humanitarian aid to both nations. October 1st The UN Security Council imposes sanctions on both nations for "their heinous acts." October 2nd Kazakhstan President says "we will ignore all sanctions and fight to the death." October 5th 5 days into the truce, Kazakhstan veterans grow restless. They want to shoot but are prohibited from it by their commanders. October 7th As the truce ends, Jalabad, Gadez and Kandahar are assaulted and fierce fighting ensues October 9th After heavy losses, Afghanistan retreats from all 3 cities with 700 deaths, 100 tanks captured, 29 helicopters seized. Kazakhstan lost 120 men killed, 10 tanks destroyed. October 11th Fresh off the momentum, Kazakhstan troops overrun the city of Ghzami and claim it for themselves in less than 4 hours. Thanks for the war debate
AOW War Scenario: Kazakhstan (pro) vs Afghanistan (con)

I'm sorry to say, but I think you may have broken the rules. Under rule 11 in the AOW rules it says this "You cannot receive donations or economic support from private agencies." I'm not sure, but if you can get an AOW member to moderate this I think he/she would agree that with August 28 that basically the colleges(assuming they weren't owned by the government) could not have intervene since they would be "donating" their services to you. Also I highly doubt without a country more worthy of a cyber warfare ex. Israel, could have saved them in 5 DAYS when cyber defenses would have been broken another 4-7 days after that. Also how did you even know you were being cyber attacked if Sony didn't know until after NK attacked them? August 28 is void. I will assume to my knowledge the cyber attack would have succeeded around September 3. Your factories are shut down by a wave of Trojans. A few blackout occur along with it. Now LET THE WAR CONTINUE! September 12 With Kazakhstan attacking Afghanistan,Afghanistan begins operation liberation. About 20,000 Afghan soldiers with 50 tanks and 40 helicopters go to recapture Gadez and Kandahar. The battle ensues. Initially Afghan troops are pushed back, but once they air reinforcements Kazakh soldiers to are forced to retreat. The casualties are both around 5,000, tanks both 10, helicopter, Kazakh 20, Afghan 15. September 15 Afghan soldier now ready with reinforcements, are ready to attack, but decide to do a few hit and runs. At night a few infiltrators steal a few guns and kill a few people. They eve manage to destroy a helicopter. September 16 Afghan forces surprise them in the morning. They destroy all of the remaining aircraft, kill another10,000 on both sides and destroy 20 tanks for Afghanistan and 25 for Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan survivors are either captured or scatter to Turkmenistan. September 20 The captured Kazakh ship are now maintaining a blockade of Kazakhstan. So far they have sunk a Kazakh merchant ship going out. September 29 Kazakh president gives a speech that they will defend against this "threat" to the nation's security. I really don't have much else to do
AOW War Scenario: Kazakhstan (pro) vs Afghanistan (con)

Thank you to my good friend for this debate :). Let the war continue in earnest today. August 25th Kazakh president declares a state of national emergency and orders "Kazakhstan must ready for war, we must defend our nation to the last." August 28th Somehow, Kazakhstan is able to restore its cyberspace. Through the intervention of technology experts in the colleges, the nation somehow restores its defenses against any malicious cyberattack. September 2nd Kazakhstan military prepares for invasion. 100 Tanks and 25 helicopters along with 20,000 troops to the border. September 4th Kazakhstan places a flag on the border as a symbol of its resolve to fight to the last. September 7th Kazakhstan armed forces detachment of 10,000 men slips through Tajikistan with consent of the president there. They strike Jalabad, and seize control of the city within a few hours, losing 25 men killed and 21 wounded. September 9th Gardez and Kandahar are seized by the Kazakh military, losing 100 men killed and 100 wounded. The offensive halts to allow time for reinforcements to arrive to continue the assault to convince Afghanistan to flee from its invasion plans.
AOW War Scenario: Kazakhstan (pro) vs Afghanistan (con)

This is a war debate challenge issued to the AOW War Group. I thank them for this debate, and wish good luck.AOW Group Members-you must vote on this!The Republic Kazakhstan is going to war against Afghanistan. I will declare the reasons for the war and begin the war in Round II.1st Round: acceptance, post your firepower.Rules: 1. no allies 2. No forfeitures! 3. use http://globalfirepower.comfor... millitary strength Good luck to my worthy opponett :). Here is my millitary layout for the Republic of Kazakhstan Kazakhstan PwrIndx: 1.6197 66 MANPOWERGoing beyond military equipment totals and perceived fighting strength is the actual manpower that drives a given military. Wars of attrition favor those with more. Total Population:17,948,816Available Manpower:8,342,680Fit for Service:6,438,168Reaching Military Age Annually:244,863]Active Frontline Personnel:110,000Active Reserve Personnel:378,000 LAND SYSTEMSTank value includes Main Battle Tanks, light tanks and tank destroyers, either wheeled or tracked. AFV value includes Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs) and Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs). Tanks:300Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFVs):1,613Self-Propelled Guns (SPGs):285Towed-Artillery:744Multiple-Launch Rocket Systems (MLRSs):393 AIR POWERIncludes both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft from all branches of service. Total Aircraft:233Fighters/Interceptors:96Fixed-Wing Attack Aircraft:103Transport Aircraft:60Trainer Aircraft:20Helicopters:66Attack Helicopters:18
Ariana Grande Is Better Than Becky G

Extend arguments.Becky G's measurements are 34-26-35 in, whereas Ariana Grande's are only 32-24-32 in (1)(2). From this we can conclude that Becky G is better than Ariana Grande, disproving the resolution, "Ariana Grande is better (greater or larger) than Becky G".Sources (1) http://healthyceleb.com...(2) http://healthyceleb.com...