The Illuminati Doesn't Exist

Hello, welcome to my debate. First, I'd like to give a brief history lesson on the term "Illuminati". This term was first used in the 18th century when the "Bavarian Illuminati" formed. Their main purpose was to promote women's rights and gender equality. With that being said, WHY and HOW is the term "Illuminati" tied to a worldwide control group that controls most governments? Also, the term "Illuminati" was first used in the 18th century. Yet, a common theory of the Illuminati is that they have been around since the beginning of humanity. That makes no sense! How could that have been a term in the beginning of humanity when it was a term created much later. Now, my second paragraph was only to show that the term "Illuminati" shouldn't be used to describe a government-control group. None of that was evidence that they exist. Everything else from here on out will be my proof. I will use some of the most common Illuminati theories and prove why they are wrong. 1. The Illuminati is a secret organization. Hmm...that's real interesting, considering if you were to survey 50 people on the street, at least 45 of them would be able to tell you what the Illuminati supposedly is. So, how is that secretive? It's not! Even celebrities that are supposedly in the Illuminati don't keep it secret, flashing the Illuminati signs (I'll get to celebrities in a minute). The bottom line is, if the Illuminati did exist, they would try a little harder to keep it secret, and obviously, that's not the case. 2. The overseeing eye represents them and their control. The overseeing eye was actually used on the $1 bill to represent America's freedom, not a government control group. 3. Celebrities that use the "666" and "Overseeing Eye" symbols are in the Illuminati, First off, with the exposure that is now on this so called "Illuminati", those celebrities definitely wouldn't be allowed to use those symbols. Secondly, and this is just a personal theory, but celebrities most likely only use those signs to generate publicity from people unwise enough to do their research on the Illuminati and come to a conclusion that it is a false theory. Yes it's negative publicity, but it's still publicity, and publicity means more money in the pocket. Of course, we have to talk about the 666 symbol. Yes, it's been used by some celebrities. However, why does this relate to the Illuminati. Let's face it, most of the people that use it aren't part of the Illuminati, however they use the symbol because they find humor with Satanism (ex. Marilyn Manson). Therefore, these symbols are used for publicity, for humor, but not a sign that they are part of the Illuminati. 4. Zionists and Free-masons are predominantly involved with the Illuminati and use the power of Satan to help them. Let's start out with the Free-masons. The Free-masonry isn't a group that even focuses on religion. It is a group that has to do with stone masonry. It includes people who are Christian, Catholic, Jewish, Buddhist, Athiest, Agnostic, and others. How does this have to do with Stan. It doesn't. Now Zionists aren't Satan worshippers either. Zionists are a branch of the Jewish religion. Another history lesson: Anywhere from 7-2 BC, Jesus Christ was born. He was the Son of God sent to Earth. However, some believed that he was the son of god, some didn't. Those who believed he was the son of God joined him and formed the Christian religion. Those who didn't believe he was the son of God obviously didn't follow him, and they remained Jewish. So basically, those of the Jewish and Christian religions both believe in the same God, but the difference is that Christians believe Jesus Christ is the messiah, while the Jewish are still awaiting the messiah to come to Earth. Therefore, if Jewish people believe and trust in God, how is that Satan worshipping? Also, if Judaism isn't a Satanic worshipping religion, then how is its' branch (Zionism) a Satanic worshipping religion, simply put, it's not. Now that I've showed why the Free-masons and the Zionists aren't devil worshippers, let's talk about why they aren't affiliated with the Illuminati. There are a lot of celebrities who are not only involved with Free-masonry and Zionism, but also supposedly are part of the Illuminati. Well, if you reference my third point, you can conclude that these celebrities are "pretending" to be part of the Illuminati for publicity. That's all that needs to be said there. Their ties to Free-masonry and Zionism have nothing to do with the Illuminati. I think I covered enough of the Illuminati theory for now. I you have any more you want me to talk about, don't hesitate to ask me. To conclude, I'm going to talk about your statement "I will state I do not believe they exist, but I also believe it is impossible to show they do not." Yes, there's always a possibility that the Illuminati does exist and there's something we don't know yet that could show that. However, as I have covered in my argument, there is not a single theory in the Illuminati theory that is coherent. I don't need to have factual data proving that they don't exist. All I have to do is shoot down every theory that says it exists. If I prove all the evidence that states the Illuminati exists to be wrong, then there's not too many signs indicating that they exist, is there? Thank you for your time and I can't wait to read your opinion.