Big bang theory

Once again, exactly what I expected. If you can't attack the message. attack the messenger. When presented with a mountain of Scientific Evidence that refutes the "Theories" that are being taught as facts - the only reply that Pro can muster has nothing to do with Science or the Big Bang Theory. Pro states- this is a blog which is difficult to take seriously. REPLY - actually the article in question first appeared in FORBES http://www.forbes.com... Pro states- If particle physics was a failure, why wouldn't Sabine Hossenfelder have posted this in a scholarly peer reviewed journal for my opponent to quote? REPLY - As I have previously stated, you only see what you want to see and hear what you want to hear. You could just click on the link (in the very post you are quoting) to hear the director of the Top Physics Research Institute in the world - tell you precisely that Particle Physics has failed. Let me link it again - https://vimeo.com... What do you think the Physicists mean by "Nightmare Scenario"? Is that what people say when their "Theories/Fairy Tails" have been confirmed? Hmmm, Big Bang Detector....Nightmare Scenario... what could this mean? Does this mean the Big Bang has been detected? Physicists are confronting their "nightmare scenario." What does the absence of new particles suggest about how nature works? https://www.quantamagazine.org... The Nightmare Scenario http://www.math.columbia.edu... With the Large Hadron Collider unable to find the particles that the theory says must exist, the field of particle physics is back to its "nightmare scenario" https://www.scientificamerican.com... Pro states- Then, you go on to quote someone from quantummagazine.org A website that most likely nobody else on debate.org has heard of, and therefore is of dubious reliability REPLY Once again, Pro's arguments have nothing to do with Science or what is actually the subject of the debate. The author of the article you question has won numerous awards for scientific writing. Council for the Advancement of Science Writing Natalie Wolchover wins Evert Clark/Seth Payne Award Another of her articles was recently honored with the 2016 Excellence in Statistical Reporting Award, presented by the American Statistical Association, and yet another was chosen for inclusion in The Best Writing on Mathematics 2015. http://casw.org... Pro States - and other reliable sources like snopes.com. REPLY Really!?! That's where Pro gets his knowledge of science from? The Internet? That says it all doesn't it? Video of Al Gore claiming to invent the Internet Snopes credibility on display... Al Gore never claimed that he "invented" the Internet, nor did he say anything that could reasonably be interpreted that way http://www.snopes.com... Pro has run as fast and as far as he can to avoid any real debate. Pro has hidden behind every possible reason he can think of to avoid responding to the scientific facts presented here. He doesn't understand the Science and does not want to. Hiding from reality is his only escape..... Let's not talk about Science or the Big Bang or Gravity or Non-existent Higgs Bosons or the CMB or anything like that... And just because you have presented links to the most respected scientists on the planet telling me that I am wrong doesn't mean anything.....As long as I don't read the links.... Instead....Let's whine about Snopes and Capitalization. 50 years ago we adopted a Theory, which is something that is literally defined as, "an UNPROVEN idea, a guess or conjecture" as though it were a fact. But recent tests and observations have made this theory absurd. Stephen Hawking - He closed by outlining "M-theory," which is based partly on ideas put forward years ago by another famed physicist, Caltech"s Richard Feynman. Hawking sees that theory as the only big idea that really explains what he has observed. http://www.space.com... It's too bad there isn't another round to this debate, I can hardly wait for Pro to cry about, "Who is Stephen Hawking and what are his credentials?" ... There is a difference between ignorance and stupidity. We are all born ignorant, meaning we have to be taught. But stupidity is choosing to remain ignorant. Pro, you have been presented with more than enough evidence to refute everything claim to believe in, and the fact that you can not bring yourself to click on the links, and did not attempt to verify or refute the claims made, on any scientific grounds- is simply because you are scared.