The christian god exists and rules over the universe.

1.In this you cover 3 main points: you disbelieve my claim of instinctively pointing to god as I provided "no evidence", is there a problem believing in god? and that my claims do not prove anything to do with gods existence.The reason that I say the instinctive response is to believe god did it is because people ask the question "why are we here?" and there is no answer based on hard evidence. A common phrase that I notice theists say are "someone created the universe" or "who created the universe?" (look at my other debates for evidence). Theists, from what I see immediately ask themselves the wrong question that can only be answered with a person being the creator of the universe, making it, by definition, god. My evidence that it is instinctive for some to think that it is god are all the true god believers that found religion for themselves and actually believe in it. The reason this is proof is because there is no evidence provided, yet they believe in it because they can"t see any other explanation (they disregard evidence). Also you do realise you wrote "faith in God that is based on evidence, this is self-defeating. Faith is believing in something without evidence. What you are really saying is, "believing in god without evidence based on evidence", see, it does not make sense. Also, from your arguments, there was nothing in there that could ever serve as "evidence", that is why it is faith, they suck you in with fear instead (but that is a whole different debate, that I am happy to have).Yes, there are many problems with believing in religion. Not only does it radicalize people, but it denies rights to innocent people. Women, black people, non-Christian people, homosexuals, mixed fabric wearers, Sunday workers etc. (just about everyone) are denied rights in the real world (by believers only) and are told that they will be tortured for eternity. This then gives rise to radicalised people like: Hitler, KKK members, Mumbai attackers, 9/11 attacker, Paris attackers etc. These people all did what they did and justified it with religion.Finally, how does my argument disprove god in any way? As in most points it does not 100% prove your point, but it is a series of many evidences that discredit your points. Something that was created due to intelligent instincts, most of the time, will be wrong, something that requires faith, because there is no evidence is usually wrong. BTW " you failed to answer my question about, what created god? 2. You agreed with the bible/Jesus in saying prayer works. Your evidence for this is that millions of Christians have experienced miracles, however, I will not receive miracles because I am not a true believer. That is not evidence, personal experiences do not count as they could be faked. And you know what, in my argument I asked you to pray this prayer "Dear God, almighty, all-powerful, all-loving creator of the universe, we pray to you to cure every case of cancer on this planet tonight. We pray in faith, knowing you will bless us as you describe in Matthew 7:7, Matthew 17:20, Matthew 21:21, Mark 11:24, John 14:12-14, Matthew 18:19 and James 5:15-16. In Jesus' name we pray, Amen." And if prayer works for believers, like you (you said it yourself), it will work. So why not say this prayer? For what reason would god have for not answering it? What about all of the Christian in Syrian and Africa whose prayers are not answered. Improbable events that are prayed for are granted by god, prayers that are unanswered are forgotten and miracles that are not prayed for vary between religious and non-religious people. Given that prayer is not possible you could surely make the connection as to how this discredits god. When the bible is wrong, Jesus lies, believers that claim prayer works lie or are misled and the basis of Christianity is taken away.3. Evolution is one of those things that is not disputed anymore, it is as close to fact as gravity is. It conflicts with the bible as the evolution of man takes millions of years instead of the 6th day, within days of the earth being, 6000 years ago. So when a proven fact conflicts with a faith based book, problem occur. As you asked for evidence that evolution, particularly macroevolution, I will provide some. If you can disprove evolution, I will write a thesis with you and we can win a Nobel Prize. Here are some working =514; links that will bring you to evidences:http://www.talkorigins.org...http://www.talkorigins.org...http://www.talkorigins.org...http://www.talkorigins.org...http://www.talkorigins.org...There is a lot of evidence there, I do not expect you to read it all, but the point is that there is a lot of evidence for macroevolution.A scientific theory is far different from the common definition, the common definition suits the word hypothesis more. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated argument for something (Wikipedia). 4. He also has not explained why (if true) this disproves the existence of God. Firstly, I could not find the link you claimed "spoke of the atomic number (117)", only Wikipedia and Encyclopaedia Britannica. As for evidence for Christianity being derived from Pagan Gods I thought that was general knowledge, so I have included another working link =514; to an overwhelming amount of evidence; http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net.... As for the connection that you could not make between my argument and the overall argument I even included it in this one, "Does that not make pagan gods more likely to be true than the Christianity god (as there has been less room for human error when it comes to numerous interpretations)?". As for the rest of the argument you have not addressed my main point about why Christianity is the correct religion out of all of them.5.The evidence I have provided to justify why religion is harmful to society is more than just, if not I will include some more. 9/11, ISIS and if they are not Christian enough how about the Holocaust and KKK. As for me using a Christian site that defends god (for evidence for statistical things like the 7% of major wars one), what is wrong with that, it if anything, is bias towards your side of view, that does not change the evidence. The medical treatment and USA evidences also still stand by themselves. Like in most of your refutes you say that I have not explained how it disproves god, I thought that it was obvious in each case, but it appears not. It would suggest that the bible does not make you a better person and in fact, it has the possibility of making good people into bad. Does not disprove anything, but can give a reason to not make it common practice.As for the link, I do not know about those. I am sorry, I can"t find the original links, not that my word counts=514;. Sorry.6. Great point! I did make a mistake. I was wrong about the commandments. Still it is easy to say a lot of the killing in the bible was murder. E.g. 21:20 "And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished. 21:21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money." You must remember that this is just 1 of about 90 examples.As for the rest of the hypocrisy I have 535 examples. 1 of which is where there is confusion of what came first, plants or humans. Plants before humans:"And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so .... And the evening and the morning were the third day." Genesis 1:11-13 "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them .... And the evening and the morning were the sixth day." Genesis 27-31Humans before plants:"These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth ... And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground." Genesis 2:4-7"And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil." Genesis 2:8-9I look ford to seeing how this "misinterprets" the bible.Like in most of your refutes you say that I have not explained how it disproves god, I thought that it was obvious in each case, but it appears not. My argument of the bible being self-contradicting does not 100% disprove the existence of the Christian god, however no evidence is, it is merely a piece of the puzzle.