Immortality would be a desirable thing

Last round Ill make this quick :) Poverty: Poverty is relevant when dealing with immortality because far more people are born into poverty than in the upper class, and if one were to suddenly become immortal while living in poverty it would be undesirable. Millions of people are born into and die still within poverty, depending on the circumstances a person with immortality could be born into poverty and it may take them decades perhaps centuries to get out of it since there is no easy path from poverty to wealth, or even from poverty to middle class. Disease: Disease is still a factor because like I said (and not refuted by the Pro) If a person was born with a debilitating disease and then granted immortality, that person would forever suffer from the ailments brought on by the disease... If someone were born with Aids for example and then granted immortality they would not die (as agreed) but since Aid's cripples a body's immune system an immortal person would be constantly catching and suffering from common colds, which is something that immortals without aids would have to fact to As for the rest of the debate: - Pro has forfeited that being immortal while living in poverty would not be desirable - Pro has forfeited that being immortal would mean enduring death of family members and loved ones and friends over and over - Pro has forfeited that being immortal and the last person on Earth would be a bad thing since the immortal would not have the company of any other human for the rest of his life, which again is forever. - Pro has forfeited that being immortal means paying taxes for the rest of a persons life, something that in all circumstances would be undesirable - Pro has forfeited that if an immortal were to stop aging after becoming immortal, but the person was only say 9 when they became immortal, would thus stop aging and never be able to be taken seriously by society would be undesirable - Pro has forfeited that if a government were to find that you were immortal that you might become a top secret lab rat for the rest of your life (forever) - Pro has forfeited that if an immortal was ugly that they would forever be looked down upon by society and that would be undesirable - Pro has forfeited that an immortal person would be unable to retire since you could never acquire the wealth to retire until the end of time itself - Pro has forfeited that an immortal person would go through a great emotional toll watching the deaths for celebrities and other people the immortal person looked up to and respected would cause a great deal of emotional suffering - Pro has forfeited that a government might force the immortal into the military since they cannot die would be undesirable - Pro has forfeited that an immortal person over time would lose valuable memories of their early life - Pro has forfeited that an immortal person would live to see the fall of their nation would cause emotional suffering - Pro has forfeited that society would evolve over time while the immortal person is unable to age and would eventually be an outcast from society which would be undesirable - Pro has forfeited that death can be a good thing There are many other woes that an immortal person would go through during his lifetime (pollution of the Earth, a fair share of ethnic cleansing's, never seeing the end of war for example) and my point is that over time all these factors over an infinite amount of time would begin to outweigh the benefits of living forever and the Pro could not over come this. I thank the Pro for a very interesting debate and I would also thank the voters for reading. PS: I ask that voters gave conduct to the pro, even though he dropped or ignored about 70% of my arguments he did allow me in the second round to tweak my arguments since I myself misunderstood the original resolution, and that is something that takes a great deal of tolerance and conduct to do....