Abortion should be illegal

C/P: "You seem to have difficulty understanding what you have read as it explain how you repeatedly make the same mistakes. " This declaration, Its just plain dishonest. You do not judge and decide this debate. Rather you participate in this debate and other -- they decide who wins or loses this debate. C/P: "" So would you consider a man and women who have been in a monogamist relationship for years, Hedonist, Just because they occasionally have sex? ". Yes I would. C/P: "You may note that nowhere in that statement does it say anything about the couple living together. " Absurd. Common law """marriage""" directly presumes that the couple live together. C/P: "And it may come as a shock to you but many adults now a days are in perfectly normal long term monogamous relationships who do not feel the need to either live together or get married. " This behavior seems hedonistic by the way I argue in this debate. C/P: "In cases such as those the state cannot classify them as married, Not even common law marriage. So for the third time, You are wrong on this mater. " You presume yourself "A G A I N" as the judge which determines right vs wrong in this debate! Hello a debate its a debate over issues and NOT a dictate made by one side over the other. Duh! Marriage as a legal institution protects a couple. Divorce and Break Ups in human relations - - pretty common. A couple who have shared a life "together" for several years, If they break up how do they divide the shared communal assets of the now defunct union? A girl friend can not go to a Court and demand paternity over children. C/P: " This is why late term abortions in the last trimester are allowed when the fetus/baby is no longer viable. " Duh! This statement proves nothing. If the baby is dead, There exists no issue what so ever that its best to remove the dead baby from the mothers' womb rather than have it rot within her! Duh! C/P: "You also pointed out that abortions should be illegal when a fetus looks more anatomically human" That's correct! Finally you have said a rational statement. That's exactly my point! Law its not the Tablets of Stone which Moses brought down from Sinai. Law its a living evolving process. C/P: "Thank you for posting that brief summery of Roe Vs Wade, As it lends to my argument as to why abortions should be legal and are. You seem to have a knack for (figuratively) punching yourself in the face and continuing on as if nothing has happened. " The 1973 Roe vs. Wade SC ruling can not just ignore it and pretend it never happened. This ostrich head in sand stupidity, Its just plain absurd. C/P: Hedonism - " It is the accepted definition used in sociology which intern is the study of the development, Structure, And functioning of human society. " You keep behaving like as if ideas exist as Catholic Dogmas! Bunk. C/P: "U. S. Government (Congress) is not allowed to make any law (or criminalize something) based on any religious establishment. " Utter and total hogwash! The separation of church and State has come into conflict on Evolution vs Creationism, For just one obvious historical example. C/P: "So your argument that abortions should be illegal because it would lead to "hedonism" as defined by you according to the bible, Would be promptly thrown out of court. " That's your private opinion. Call me a prick but i just love to burst your self righteous conceited self opinionated arrogance. You do not speak for all US Judges and all US Courts. C/P: " "Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and [breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, And the man became a living being]. Based on this one could say that until a baby breathes outside the womb it is not considered living, " Classic interpretation of your quoted verse has the traditional interpretation that God breathed the Spirit of His Name into clay, Transforming that clump of earth into a living soul. Where does the baby in the womb get the air it requires to live? From the air breathed in and out by its mother; the gases exchange by means of the placenta. C/P: "But I would rather not use religion and instead base my arguments on established law and facts. " Your skewed absurd notion of the 5 Books of Moses as limited to a religious idea. . . Beyond stupid. The 5 Books of Moses functioned as the working Constitution ie basic law of the Davidic Kingdom of ancient Israel. Only in the Middle Ages did the vile church pervert the T'NaCH literature as something that's strictly limited to religious faith and belief. C/P: " If it were me I would have said "Abortions After the First Trimester Should be Illegal", And then in my opening statement listed all the caveats where I thought it was acceptable, Before talking about the issue with hedonism. " YOU did not initiate this debate but rather agreed to join the debate that I started. Therefore you do not set the parameters of how I debate.