Evolution is true, Creationism is false.

It's cool, m8. ' As none of us have lived in the distant past, we are merely assuming what has happened. The Book of Genesis was written by Moses, a prophet of God. God spoke to Moses, and Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible, which includes creation. That is a firsthand account of the start of mankind.' Merely assuming what has happened. That applies to you too. And what did Moses have, a God phone? Did God come down to Earth to have some tea? Again, the only evidence you have that the Bible is God's word is the Bible, same as the evidence for God, Moses being the writer and Creationism. Which, the Bible is right because God says so, and God is right because the Bible says so. Open your eyes, the Bible is just made up fiction. 'Explain why, if we have said intelligence, we are destroying the world with war, pollution and all of the other man-produced problems that were caused.' A chimpanzee's intelligence doesn't even come close to ours, that's why I said we have the best intelligence in nature. This is irrelevant to intelligence. And no, it wasn't because of the 2 fictional characters ate from some tree that we discovered wrongdoing. There is no right or wrong in nature, it's just survival. 'If science keeps such an open mind, why does it reject creationism?' Because there is no evidence at all, as opposed to evolution, which has tons.If one day there is undeniable proof for creationism, then science will support it too. 'how do we know whether or not dinosaurs coexisted with humans.' No dinosaur fossils found with humans' or any other modern mammal is the simplest irrefutable answer. Dinosaurs would have found humans as easy prey too. The meteor (crater in Yucat"n Peninsula) that wiped out the dinosaurs would have rendered humans extinct too. 'Biogeography is just false.' Continental shifts and plate tectonics suggest otherwise. Some invisible nonexistent dude putting them there makes much less sense. 'Don't invasive species also counteract biogeography?' That's because humans introduced them to new places. 'If the human embryo has gills, that is just because it needs to be able to live in the womb for nine months.' What the damn. I suggest you do some research before you state anything here. You don't even know what an embryo is. https://en.wikipedia.org... And no, I don't refer to pro-evolution websites for reference. ' That still does not prove that Neanderthals existed. They weren't on the "evolutionary line to become Homo Sapiens," because they were Homo Sapiens.' Oh please. Neantherdals' skulls look like ape's skulls but more human, this is the simplest of explanations. If you could just bring a science website as a reference instead of those so desperate as to ignore plain evidence, that would be great. If you're so sure that Neantherdals don't exist, go show it to the experts and win a Nobel prize. 'there must be a First Mover, not moved by anything else, and this is what everyone understands by God.' No, God doesn't make rain. It is an endless cycle of evaporation, condensation, rainfall, water flowing into the river and going back to the sea again. Life is an endless cycle, God has nothing to do with anything. 'an infinite chain of causation is impossible, so there must be a First Cause, called God.' I am so darned tired of this. Why do theists refer everything that happens to be a motive of God? Look at how desperate that sentence is. There must be something...it must be God. That can't happen...it must be God. If the tables were switched, it would sound something like this: 'Why are black holes dark? Must be science. Why is 1+1=2? Must be science. How does gravity work? Science.' This is the philosophical fallacy every theist clings on to as it is the only thing science can't explain yet. 'Our experience includes things certainly existing but apparently unnecessary.' Why do mountains exist? Why is the color blue blue? There is no why, there is only a how. Why doesn't suggest there's God, how is debunked by science. 'There must be a superlative that is the truest and noblest thing, and so most fully existing. This then, we call God.' This is the most desperate claim I have ever seen. 'A direction of actions to an end is noticed in all bodies following natural laws. Anything without awareness tends to a goal under the guidance of one who is aware. This we call God.' Then God is just another name for gravity, light, atoms... We are not going to say God keeps us on the ground, things are made of tiny God, it's dark, turn on the God. Stop claiming credit for everything, God. Well, there we have it, no evidence for creationism whatsoever, God too. I'd like Con to refute my evidence, if possible. Evolution is already accepted worldwide, even some open-minded Christians support it. It fits all available evidence and is close as you can get to a fact. You try to refute one piece of evidence, there's a mountain of others to back it up.