The boy scouts should only allow boys

Beginning rebuttals, will all be done one by one and gradually: Con says: "I see no issue with allowing girls in boy scouts." There's plenty of issues, first of all it is called the "boy scouts". We don't really let girls into men's bathrooms or into school dormitories, it's basically the same logic. I wouldn't let girls enter the men's bathroom, so why let them in the boy scouts? The hypocritical part is that boys can't enter the girl scouts even though the girls want to join the boy scouts. Con says: "I find it odd that you said "perhaps even early pregnancy" as if that is worse than molestation, but I'll not get into that." No no, just mean that both can happen because teenagers have larger sex drives than children or adults as they've just hit puberty. The idea of the boy scouts is for boys to officially become men and survive out in the wilderness. Also, the boys will not focus too well on the merits and rewards, their minds would end up focusing on girls because that's how teenage boys function, I'm saying this as a 15 year old myself (although I'm not a boy scout, I understand the whole idea behind it) Con says: "Young boys and girls are exposed to each other constantly, boy scouts doesn't affect that at all even without girls. Boy scouts is supposed to help boys learn respect and to treat people well in general, correct? Than that is the last place sexual abuse is likely to happen. I know people who were sexually abused at school, but that doesn't mean that schools should be segregated." Yes in school or in public where there's a load of people around them, in the scouts they are in tents on their on trying to survive. Also, the whole point of boy scouts is to allow boys to officially become men and remain away from the opposite sex preventing sexual desire from taking them over. Con says: "Boy scouts isn't equal to girl scouts, as much as people like to push that idea. Boy scouts, if you stick to it, can increase your job opportunities and collage choose, but girl scouts does no such thing. At least not near the same extent." Then what girls should do is simply join the girl scouts and point out the problems they have and do their best to fix the girl scouts, not ruin another organization. Con says: "Therefore, without allowing girls into boy scouts, you limit a route of opportunity to a single sex." But boys need to be separated from girls as it's the boy scouts, it's why people join, to become men and fight off their desires and also earn survival skills. It's unfortunate because girls seem to not want men to remain in a place away from girls. What they do in the boy scouts actually works best with single-sex. Con says: "The military is no replacement either, as the military puts your life on the line." Unlikely, because no military would send 11-18 (Maybe 18 year old youths but unlikely) year old youths to go to Afghanistan or Iraq to engage in combat. And putting combat out, it won't risk life, it's just hard training. Con says: "Not to mention the boy scouts itself exists for them to have fun and learn things, not to paint a sign on a tree house saying, "No girls allowed." Con's point here does not seem to make that much sense as he really just pointed out what the boy scouts are for with a different vocab, that is kind of the point, it is for boys only after all because the name is "boy scouts" not "co-ed scouts." Con says: "The girl scouts also have age peramiders to reach diffrent ranks which is frustrating for many whom find themselves wanting to do more (Actually why both my older sisters quit). Girl scouts also has a different emphasis in general than boy scouts, of which many young girls find more appeling." Again, what they should be doing is try to fix the girl scouts and not damage the boy scouts because they happen to do activities that they are interested in. Con says: "In some cases there may not be a girl scout troop available in someones area, and boy scouts may be the only available opportunity. Or may just not fit in, I know I wouldn't of." Not sure how con makes sense in this particular statement. This is not a good enough excuse for a girl to force her way into the boy scouts. Con says: "I would avoid using youtube channels in general as sources, especially those ones." That's a good point, but some of them are actually quite valid and explain pretty well despite being from YouTube. Besides, not many people will want to create a blog about this issue as it's pretty much common sense that girls should not be allowed in boy scouts and vice versa. But the YouTube source I gave was uploaded by a gentleman who was a former boy scout and he understands the whole idea behind it, so it's pretty much a decent source. Con says: "Boy Scouts of America made the decision for a reason, and it is more than their right to do so." It's their right but a lot of people will not allow their sons to become boy scouts from now because of the damage done from allowing girls into the organization. [1] [2] http://motto.time.com... [3] https://youtu.be... [4] https://www.theblaze.com...