There is No Biblical Support for Young Earth Creationism

We have Seen that YEC is backed up within the Bible because with the Biblical Genealogies that we CAN count by and do count by, do go back to 4,000 B.C. roughly. I do not for the life of me understand why Tarzan continues to say it does not. I can only assume he is not reading the material or just lying to win the debate. Every timeframe is accounted for in the Bible. I cannot believe that Tarzan actually read all of that information in an hour and compared all of the timeframes. Though yes the author does speculate on several events not one bit of the speculation is in relation to the 4,000 B.C. year date. The speculation is just on other nations histories during those timeframes or locations of certain places. He is discrediting the YEC generational account support just because He does not like it? How can I possibly handle blind ignorance? There was no speculation in any of his quotes for say "I believe 50 years should go here…." Or "Oh! I think 100 years sounds nicely here!" Let me repeat for Tarzan's sake. Every year is accounted for. All speculation was based upon where it fell in the history books we studied. We saw that Tarzan did not know about Genesis 11 picking up where Genesis 5 left off. He did not know the Moses account of 430 years picked up after Genesis 11 and then the reign of the Judges picked up from there and was counted, then the reign of the Kings was counted up until the Time of Christ, which we are all certain about. We also see that He never addressed the timeline. He only pointed to speculation of other nations timelines in the authors work. He is "skunking". The Resolution has been fulfilled. Just saying "no it has not." Is by no means grounds for denial. You have to have grounds for denial not just your opinion. You have to show all of the sources genealogies sum total was off or the author failed to count accurately and it really should have been 4.5 Billion years. We see below Tarzan's summary: <<""My opponent has utterly failed to answer these objections: 1) There are no birth ages for many people in the genealogies (dismissed as irrelevant) 2) The genealogies rely on historical conjecture, possibilities, and probabilities (dismissed as irrelevant) 3) If we accept history as a valid gap-filler, history is in conflict with the ridiculous ages of Biblical Characters."">> As for 1) The genealogies we count by DO all have the timeframes birth and deaths laid out. Just saying no they don't does make you right. Just because some Genealogies do not contain timeframes does not mean they are the ones we are using to count by. That is being disingenuous to the audience and potentially to you. All genealogies that do not contain timelines only lend support and credit to the previous ones. We use them to validate the ones that count. We have a complete timeframe backed up by the Bible in all of its Genealogies. 2) No they do not. The ones that you count with all include a timeline right back to Adam. Is this a hard concept for you? They all have ages and years. You are dismissing credible data just because "you want to." 3) No history is not in conflict from Exodus on. We do not have a historical recorded timeframe that is far enough back as the Bible is. We have no complete cataloging of events that is pre Bible. The Bible is the only catalog with that kind of detail. You misunderstand historical data. Outside of the Bible a lot of Historical timeframes are speculative at best. Every year is accounted for in the Bible. Tarzan is misleading because he did not know all of the genealogies that are used to count by. He is using slight of hand pointing to the author's speculation that is irrelevant to the debate. He is also using wool cloth by stating that the Bible actually does not count they years all the way back. I have counted it. So has the author. His statements to the contrary is simply untrue. Is there a vote option for like 50 points when the opponent is just not using truth? Again all years are accounted for by using all the genealogies.