The God Hypothesis is the best scientific explanation for the origins of existence

THE GOD HYPOTHESIS 1. Philosophically,there cannot be an infinite amount of time because Time is by definition is a series of "moments". The nature of a moment is "a beginning of the future and an end of the past." The assumption of an absolutely first moment would consequently carry with it the implication of a period of which is terminated by, and prior to, that first moment, and the prior time would itself contain moments. Furthermore, if time was eternal in the past, it follows that we would have never have gotten here at this point. For example, if I told someone that before I go to bed, I will flip the light switch for an infinite amount of times, would I be able to go to bed still? The answer would be NO. Thus, there would have to be an absolute first cause. However, If time is supposed to be a part of the universe, then the first cause could not possibly be the universe itself, so it must be some entity that is not made up of the Universe that is the First cause. I will call this first cause the God Hypothesis. FALSIFICATION 2. We can make testable predictions for this hypothesis. If the God hypothesis is true, it would show that the universe had an absolute beginning in the past and that it came from nothing. CON can falsify this by showing that the universe had no cause at all or requires one. This would completely negate the God hypothesis entirely or CON can do it the hard way and falsify everyone of my claims I will make about this hypothesis. THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE 3. Now, its time to provide evidence for this hypothesis: The Space-Time Theorem of General Relativity clearly states that space, time, and matter and energy all had a concrete beginning. This theorem has been shown to be 8 decimals accurate along with general relativity created by Einstein to be 5 decimals accurate. Borde, Guth,Vilenken developed a theorem which proves that ANY universe which is on average in a state of cosmic expansion greater than 0 throughout its history cannot be infinite in the past, but must have a past space time boundary. This theorem holds even when we don't have a complete quantum theory of gravity of the early universe. In addition, Even if we are just a tiny part of a so-called "multi-verse", their theorem would STILL require an absolute beginning from this multi-verse as well. The Law of Cause and Effect states that for every effect there must be a cause for it. This means the universe coming into existence out of nothing would be the effect ,therefore, we can assume and verify a cause. THE INDUCTIVE METHOD Now, the space-time boundary prevents us from observing this entity directly to discover the properties of this cause. However, There are all kinds of things that we can't see or identify but yet we see there effects which led us to potential hypothesises about what they potentially were and how those things manifest using the inductive method of reasoning. Inductive reasoning is a form of logic that is most characteristic of the scientific method itself, because it moves from the effects to causes which can yield the most likely conclusion for a certain body of data. This inductive method is important for physicist when observing the unobservable nature of subatomic particles or atoms, which can only be detected through indirect manners in order to learn about its nature. OMNI-PRESENT, ETERNAL, AND IMMATERIAL A. Now, based on the law of causality and the two theorems demonstrating a finite universe, whatever caused this beginning must have been a timeless, changeless, and an immaterial being that created the universe. It must be timeless and therefore changeless without the universe because it created time. Since it also created space, it must transcend space as well and must therefore be immaterial not physical. Thus, the properties of this cause would be omni-present, eternal, and immaterial. DISEMBODIED MIND B. There are only two possible candidates we are aware of that can possibly fit such a description of an immaterial, omnipresent, and eternal entity: either an abstract object or a disembodied mind. However, abstract objects by definition do not stand in casual relationships. For instance, the number 9 cannot do anything. Only an unembodied mind would stand in agent causality, as philosophers call it, where a cause would be able to bring about new effects at will without any prior determining conditions by virtue of its agency; this unembodied mind would manifest itself within the universe just like human minds act as agents in the physical world through our bodies. This would explain why you can get a temporal effect with a beginning from an eternal cause. Therefore, it follows logically that the cause of the universe is a personal disembodied mind for it to have the intrinsic desire to create a universe that allows the existence of intelligent life and then freely choose to act upon that desire. ALL-KNOWING C. The fundamental laws and constants of nature fall under an extraordinarily narrow range of life permitting values ,within an infinite set, in which the right value was chosen every time. The slightest change in these values would prevent our life-permitting universe. Moreover, these perfectly calibrated laws and constants to allow the existence of intelligent life came into being right after the big bang, error free and without change throughout this process. This means that the cause for the beginning of the universe also had to have been the explanation of the finely tuned universe. Thus, it would be evidence of cosmic intelligent design as the possible explanation. Although, it would not necessarily mean this entity has unlimited knowledge, but we have other reasons to believe it does. For example, The Principle of Universality states, that the same general scientific principles are probably true throughout the cosmos. This principle can bring us to the conclusion that by extracting from the unknown amount of intelligence in the natural sciences to the most likely degree of intelligence that is applicable throughout the cosmos. Since the universe will expand forever as proven by the BGV theorem, there's potentially an infinite number of mathematical relations out there to be discovered. Each of these relations by definition represents a small amount of cosmic intelligence waiting to be understood, so it follows that the universe must necessarily possess an infinite degree of mathematical intelligence. This not only suggest that the cause is intelligent but the degree of intelligence and knowledge is unlimited. Thus, the attribute of this cause must be omniscience. ALL-POWERFUL D. Our universe along with the law of physics was created out of absolutely nothing perfectly fine-tuned to support life from the very beginning. This is something that would be impossible since there is no example of an actual "nothing" or absence of reality and thus it would be something that is outside of human experience and knowledge. However, this would not necessarily mean this entity has unlimited power, but we have other observations to believe it does. The expansion rate of the universe, which is a product of fine-tuning, will continue to accelerate forever. This shows that there's potentially an infinite degree of power or rates of acceleration being exerted to expand the universe. Thus, the attribute of this cause must be omni-potent. OCCAM'S RAZOR 4. Occam's Razor is a principle urging one to select among competing hypotheses that which makes the fewest assumptions and thereby offers the simplest explanation of the effect. In other words, one should not multiply causes beyond necessity. The God Hypothesis is a rational hypothesis that has been demonstrated to be true and verified by many points of data, Its falsifiable and it postulates only one cause. Therefore, the God Hypothesis is the simplest explanation compared to the rest.