Diana Was Murdered in an Assassination

On August 31st 1997, Princes Diana died. The world was told that there had been a terrible car accident and that as a result she and Dodi Al Fayed were both killed. I was neither a fan nor an opponent of Diana, and when it comes to that family my interest in them is fairly minimal. I have no particular dog in the fight other than a desire to go where the truth takes me " wherever that happens to be. With all of that said, it has been my long held assertion that Diana did not die by accident "but by design. While the nature of this case and the high profile identities of those involved may make it impossible to produce a "smoking gun", I feel that what I can reasonably do is lay out a strong case in which the reader will agree that the proposition is at least highly plausible. Let"s begin with a bold fact " spousal homicide is not rare. On the contrary, a very great number of victims of murder die at the hand of the one they once married. While the means and motives may often differ, the fact is that spousal murder is by no means an uncommon occurrence. There is no rational or logic reason to assume that the royal family would be immune to it. Unless you think royals have always behaved to some higher moral standard and hold an almost angelic like nature, then there should be absolutely no reason to think it far- fetched that a member of that family could harbour a mind for murder. Now let"s introduce another bold fact " Diana predicted her own murder. Not only did she predict it, she was specific about it and wrote it down. Here"s the evidence of that; This is from the Telegraph in 2007 but can be confirmed anywhere. http://www.telegraph.co.uk... She wrote: "I am sitting here at my desk today in October, longing for someone to hug me and encourage me to keep strong and hold my head high. "This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous - my husband is planning 'an accident' in my car" ** This note was authentic, hand written and sent to Paul Burrell, who was then her butler. That was in 1993, four years before she did indeed die in "an accident". While this note in isolation is not proof that she was the victim of an assassination, I am absolutely confident that if Diana were any ordinary women and Charles any ordinary man, then detectives would most certainly have had Charles in for questioning when that note emerged. It is a truly remarkable thing for any women to write about her husband regardless of it coming true or not. No one would write such a thing unless in fact that held some level of fear for their life and a fear of their husband. Any murder needs a motive. Can we objectively look at the situation and say that Charles (and perhaps other members of that family) had a motive to get rid of Diana? Yes we can. Not only can we cite a motive, but we can list several potential motives all of which would be a legitimate reasons why Charles, his mother and others within the establishment would rather her gone. Perhaps the biggest motive of all is that Diana will have had so much on Charles and all the secrets of that family. All families have secrets, right? Some secrets are perhaps bigger than others. They had never been able to control and silence Diana how they wanted to while she was alive. I believe this worried them for the future. The more estranged she became from the family the more likely she would be to expose things that which I am sure that family would sooner remained known only to the few. Just as spousal murder is not rare, it is also not rare that fear of exposure is often a motive for murders. She was outspoken, controversial, had she lived then Charles and his mother would have had to go the rest of their lives hoping beyond hope that Diana wouldn"t go too far with what she said. Why would they take that gamble, especially when she herself is not of their blood but someone that married into that family? Moreover, why would they take the risk when they simply do not need to and they know that there would be zero consequences for simply arranging to have her killed? Who is truly going to bring Charles and the Queen in for questioning? No one. It was also a known fact that Diana had been having a relationship with Dodi and may even have been pregnant. This is from the Express but can also be found anywhere. http://www.express.co.uk... He said: "It is a near certainty Diana was nine to 10 weeks pregnant at the time she died, according to papers from the Paris Public Hospitals archives. "The document dated August 31 1997 was sent to the then minister of the interior Jean-Pierre Chevenement, with copies to health minister Bernard Kouchner, foreign affairs minister Hubert Vedrine and Paris police chief Martine Monteil." He added: "It has never been claimed or proved to be a fake." * While this may not be the only motive as to why they"d want Diana dead, it is not hard to accept it possibly being a motive. If not THE motive then maybe one of several that led to the decision being made. Another possible motive is that Charles himself wanted Diana totally out of his life so that he could marry Camilla. He would not be the first husband to arrange for his existing wife(or ex) to be killed so that the husband was free to pursue another love interest. They were to marry in 2005. With a motive a murderer also needs the means. Can we reasonably say that Charles and his mother would have the means? Of course we can. British intelligence agents would act on their orders. They are sworn to protect "the crown". This can be taken to mean anything the Queen considers a "threat" at any given time " including a renegade wife of her son. Not only would they have the means, but they would probably have the very best means that anyone can have " an entire intelligence apparatus at "Her Majesty"s Service".