God is not moral and the Problem of Evil logically says he does not exist.

==Simmary== It would seem that my opponent’s account is no longer active, sad. However, I thank him for this debate. As there was some good and emotionally compelling arguments on his end, This is why I think I won. The problem with my opponent arguing that Morality is not objective is because then you can’t factually state that God is evil, nor can you fully define evil because its entirely based off an “opinion”. For example if I say “9 = nine”, then I’m stating that this is objectively true regardless of what you think because numbers are factual. But what if numbers was subjective? as in based on the opinions of others. So we ask Bob who is dyslexic and he thinks that “9 = 6”, because numbers are now subjective then” 9=6 and 9”. See the logical problem here? Its a paradox. For making a claim evil exists, and therefore God logically does not exist requires you to prove that despite whatever you think, X Evil is Evil. For if you say killing is subjective, then you can’t say God did any evil at all, because if you asked a serial killer if he thought killing was ok then killing would be ok, and if you asked a pacifist he would say otherwise, so killing is ok & wrong, so God does & doesn’t exist… See the logical problem? This is clearly a problem for pro because we aren’t debating that He probably does not exist, we are debating if he logically does not exist. I’ll go ahead and show that I have kept all my positions and note that Pro couldn’t keep the topic. Position 1: God is good. Showed this through the story of Joseph, and God saving his people. Including the wicked brothers. Is this not good? Position 2: The Abrahamic God does coexist in a universe that has evil. Proved this that the Bible does claim that evil does exist, and so does God. Which Pro dd drop in round 3. Position 3: Position 2 is not logically impossible, but possible. See position 2. Position 4: Morality is not simple, and sometimes certain moral “rules” as the pro calls do not apply in all frames of reference. (this position may be irrelevant depending on how he argues. ) Obviously morality is not simple in either case, for subjective wouldn’t be simple from the weighing of pros & cons, and objective morality from trying to discern what is right from a pile of human morals. Position 5: Gods morality is objective, and not subjective. Now I do beleive that objective morality does exist, for surely when the nazis did the holocaust it was objectively wrong. For if God made the universe, surely he must of decided what is good and right. But if i'm wrong then Pro can't say God logically does not exist. Position 6: God does exist. I have defended my position, by pointing out that not everything is created. But just simply exist because its impossible for them not to exist because of what they are (Numbers). And shown that entire universe doesn’t have to be designed for mankind. Just enough that we have dominion on the earth. Topic: “God is not moral and the Problem of Evil logically says he does not exist. ” Pro has two problems. Pro can’t possibly prove God is not moral if morality is subjective, nor is he able to claim that logically he does not exist if it's subjective. As i’ve shown earlier. Because Pro did forfeit a round, that I kept all my positions, and shown that Pro couldn’t keep the Topic, then vote in favor of Con.