Gay marriae should not be acknowledged by the Federal Goveronment

The Supreme Courts decision is null and void, Article 3 of the Constitution lists all the powers granted to the Supreme Court, and none of them include 'defining marriage,' and since there was never ant ammendment passed granting the Supreme Court this power, their decision is void and without meaning, you can see the constitution here. {1} This may not apply to Loving v. Virginia, since the Supreme Court was granted the power to enforce the law, since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 {2} says in Title 2 Section a; "All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, and privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin."This does not apply to gay marriges, and for a number of reasons, I will post 3 reasons why this clause does not apply to gay marriage, and each one will have a few paragraphs to back it up. Number one, it does not count as discrimination since the definition of discriminate is "[to]make an unjust or prejudicial distinction in the treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, sex, or age." To refuse to acknowladge a marriage on moral grounds is not unjust, by doing so you are not showing prejudice and it is not on grounds of race, sex, or age. It is not unjust since the definition of unjust is not based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair, on the contrary, if this decision not to acknowledge gay marriages can be proven to be upon moral grounds, then it may not be defined as unjust. So, I will prove that gay marriges are immoral, thus denying them is not unjust, and therefor not discrimination. To prove this, throught history, marriage has always been defined as a) between a man and a woman, and b) a religious instituion. This has been true always, in Native American Culture, Jewish culture, Zoroastrianism, etc. Since when marria was invented, it has always been defined as betwee a man and a woman, this is the proper and correct definition, and anything otherwise, may be catagorized as sex outside of marriage, therefor immoral. It is not a preudice since prejudice means to judge someones person based on sex, race, creed, etc. No one is prejudice against gay people since no one is making a biased statement/belief about them which has no actual gronds other than bias. For example, to say all Muslims are terorists would be a prejudice, while saying 'the Qur'an mandates them to be terrorists' is not. Thus, since no one is saying anything about the chracter of gay people out of bias bynot acknowlding their marriages, this is not prejudice. If someone didn't want to participate in /acknowledge a gay marriage because "all gay men are axe weilding murderers," this would be prejudice, otherwise, it is not. Gay people would not be denied accomidation or equal protection undeer law if we chose not to acknoledge gay marriages. The reason for his is that itr isn't on account of them being gay, it is on account of what they want to be acknowledged. If a straight man wanted to have a false marriage acknowledged, he would be turned away too, if a Muslim tried to marry a nine year old girl, would not acknowladging his false marriage count as discriminating against pedophiles? Since the claims of discrimination are on accounts of being deprived of a accomidation which is non-specific. Meaning, the acmidation is different for each person. For example, say there were a guy who wanted to drive into a military base, and the military prevented him from doing it, then he claims that he is being discriminated against, because he is being deprived of the ability to drive where he wants, while people who don't want to drive into a military base are allowed to drive whereaver he wants. I've proven that any claims of discrimination on accounts of sexual orientation are not genuinely cases of discrimination. Keep in mind, according to the Tenth Ammendment, the issue of gay marriage should be left to the states respectively or to the people. {1}. http://www.archives.gov... {2}. https://www.ourdocuments.gov...