LGBT Civil Rights

"Such crapola because some Scholar tells you an opinion don"t make it fact, especially tsince the beginning of time, AND as EVIDENCE not opinion has proven, vis a vis, what automatically happens immediately upon catastrophic occurrences, ie" rape pillage and plunder, (remember Katrina) , people will EAT EACH OTHER in desperate situations, gangs form and your pretended Brainiac"s, scramble for cover!" - Ah, the ought/is fallacy. You cannot get an ought from an is. Natural law/property rights is PRESCRIPTIVE, not DESCRIPTIVE. It tells people how to act justly. "I HAVE no burden of proof as I said. The Facts are simple. One who doesn"t look at all, cannot Claim knowledge of subject matter as if they know , especially when it is plain the person refuses to study for himself!" - Nope, you're still shifting the burden of proof. You made a posit with no evidence, and I rejected it. Logic 101 bro. "So as I said before, You CANNOT CLAIM knowledge of a Subject you have NEVER investigated except by opinions conjectures of OTHER people. This of course ... has nothing to do with some IMAGINED burden you liars (and that"s what that is " somebody somewhere lead you to believe that it is the Religious who have some imaginary responsibility to PROVE something to those to ignorant to look for themselves? WRONGO!" - Still shifting the burden, and nice ad hominem, does not matter who makes a posit. The posit is either true or false regardless of who made it. "Tell me who dresses you? Who feeds you? Who teaches you? Nobody GIVES you anything it is YOU who MUST feed yourself, Dress yourself, Study the material provided to LEARN! So quit lying to yourself." - Uhm, Okay. I agree. I have no right to force anyone to provide for me. (What the hell does this have to do with LGBT rights or natural law/property rights "Allow me to PROVE the only thing I am obligated BY God Himself to tell you? That"s ALL Christians?" God is an unproven posit. You're shaping your world view based off of a falsity. Mark 16:14 Later as they were eating, Jesus appeared to the eleven and rebuked them for their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they did not believe those who had seen Him after He had risen. 15And He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. 16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned."Do you see anything about Burden of proof? Nope, it states plainly tell you " period. You don"t look? You don"t believe " CONDEMNED!" - I'm terrified, I've been condemned to an imaginary place. Also, all further religious tripe will be ignored, until you prove it's validity. "You see God states He has put right in FRONT of your own eyes all the proof you need, that YOU deny it"s Him who has done them is YOUR error! To which God adamantly tells YOU, that YOU are without excuse! End of story " YOUR being held accountable BY GOD to look and learn!" - When I look infront of me, I see your sophistry, not God :D "Things that are useless are generally discarded! I AM the expert here not any other when it comes to God, because I KNOW God, you don"t, I have a relationship with the Real God" - You have relationship with an imaginary friend... "I stated "Listen to you. You don"t HAVE any argument Do You?" You responded "- I don't need one. I just must prove your arguments false, as you are the one attempting to use force."" - I don't, I only need arguments for my posits, of which I've only made one, that being the natural law posit, which I provided a unbroken chain of logic from first principles. Everything else, is rejecting your posits. "See? Deluded to the core. Playing games, ducking, dodging " No facts at all. Just opinions, false conjectures, and an inability to see truth under any form. Your dead, Pro, ther"s no Life in you. You just a yes man in ayes World. Unfortunately for you. It will end badly for you." - Not an argument. "I can feel bad for you, but I can also let you suffer the consequences of your actions, and just let you go to hell, precisely as you wish! Like God Himself, I won"t take away your right of choice " NOR The Right that you suffer the consequences OF THAT CHOICE!" - Not an argument "UNLESS they walk around naked? How are you going to know? You"ve met one, you just didn"t know nor ask! Blinders Pro, you walk around with blinders on " why are you surprised that you DON"T know!" - Most trans are pretty obvious, also saying I walk with 'blinders on' is not an argument "The only natural law is Gods, which you don"t know. You have shown no knowledge of this subject matter to argue with. In fact you have YET to argue at all. Throwing ad this and ad that as responses. As if I have some obligation of Burden of Proof. That"s how you people operate Pro. You sit there without knowledge, without Proof saying the same thing " I"m going to stay in my bubble till somebody GIVES me all the evidence " I refuse to seek it myself, and until and UNLESS someone Else assumes the responsibility of proving it TO ME, I refuse to believe anything but what I think!" - First, God has not been proven to exist. You have the burden of proof because you want to use force, and you make the posit of God (I have the burden of proof for natural law, which I have met) Again, if something is true, it should be easy to prove. You claim to believe in God, yet you refuse to prove it. I believe in gravity, and I will do a test to prove it anytime you ask me :D "That"s atheists in a nutshell Pro." - Yes it, most atheists use logic and reason from first principles to reject your bogus posits. "The point is and HAS been proven Pro, you can deny the Facts, but it doesn"t alter the FACTS. LGBT should NOT BE given Civil Rights as they have DEMONSTRATED actions abnormal and Destructive to all civilizations in History past. Their depravity resulted in the total annulations of Sodom and Gomorra." - It'd be nice if you'd supported you posit with something that isn't FICTION. "Were I to look at your debates, Discussions over the internet, I bet I can"t find a THING you actually know about huh? Just a bunch of smack talk? Saying nothing just spouting Cliche, giving No REAL insights either. Nope ain"t gonna waste my time, Pro, you just don"t have anything important to say!" - Not an argument. Either my posits are true or they arent "You don't say anything that's factual, just opinionated. You provide no insights, given no substance to this debate? I cannot see any point in continuing a discussion with one who is unlearned of the subject matter and going to continue to just spout nonsense." - I've only made one posit, and that being natural law/property rights, in which I provided an unbroken chain of logic from first principles. "I do believe I've carried MY responsibility to provide TRUTH in this debate." - Bro, you quoted bible verses, I called BS, and then you tried to shift the burden of proof. All you've done is appeal to a false authority, personally attack me. You're clearly angry because you're losing the debate. You didn't expect to run into someone who would call you on your BS, eh?