Should creationism be taught in schools? (Evolution vs Creation)

Evolution is a scientific theory, i have repeated this several times, yes it is backed up by science. We are debating about creationism- the belief that God creating all beings. Creationism is a belief, I have repeated over and over to con, we are not debating on whether or not creationism is backed by science or not, we are debating whether or not we should teach a fundamental religious principle to kids. You can disprove creationism all you want, it doesn't change the fact that hundreds of millions of people have and still do believe in it. It doesn't change the fact that this idea is ingrained into our history like in the declaration of independence. The Bible should not be interpreted literally. God's days may be different from human days, the Bible even specified, God plus is not in the physical realm altered by such trivial things such as time etc, he can stop time because He's omnipotent, putting a time frame God is like putting a time frame on the origin of the time period before the big bang, its nonexistent. The Earth is not 6000 years old, a Jewish rabbi calculated that a God day was approximately 2 billion years. Look it's stated in psalms "A thousand years in Your sight are but as yesterday" (Psalm 90:4) this alludes that God may actually have created the earth a pretty long time ago. God is ageless but the universe isn't. So 7X2 billion=14 billion, around on par with with much of what scientists proved. But I'm not here to talk science am I. topic:Should creationism be taught in schools? (Evolution V's Creation)debate text:I do not believe that creationism is a viable model for our existence to be taught as a fact. I believe the scientific theory of evolution is currently the only logical explanation for our existence today and creationism should not be taught in schools. My opponent will try to disprove this that creationism can be a viable explanation for our existence and must present his/her arguments in the first round. ""Our debate is about education, not science. our debate is centered and focused on whether or not creationism is a viable model for our existence. Con has been arguing about science because he said "I believe the scientific theory of evolution is currently the only logical explanation for our existence. .. ." That is not my objective this debate, nor should I have to because the plan text didn't tell me to. I have already proved and defined the "viable explanation" he was searching for and that I have provided it. He has dropped it in round 2&3 and failed to bring it up meaning he concedes the evidence. I have already explained why creationism should be taught. Con has been trying to throw scientific fact after scientific fact to make my case look weak, despite the fact that I have argued that creationism is not supported by science, therefore why is Con throwing these arguments if I already stated that? The answer is simple truly, my opponent believes that I am advocated that creationism is and should be teached as a science, which is truly not what I stated. I stated that it should be taught, but not as a science and should not be treated like one. I believe that con has misunderstood what this debate truly comes down to: education. His argument for education is that we should not teach our children fairy tales. Creationism is not a fairy tale, it is unlike Hansel and Gretel, but is an idea that has been taught for generations. Con has also stated that our current education system now has a better alternative to how we came about, evolution. Yes evolution is much more scientific alternative but it does not undermine the fact that creationism has altered out history. These kids will be confused as to why our forefathers stated things such as "our creator" because they wouldn't know about creationism. We send student to schools to be educated, this will not teaching them a religion, but merely parts of history where it is relevant and important. I rest my case. I may not be debating next round since I kind of started early if you don't want me to.