That Islam is perfect...

As salaamu alaikum My opponent has once again failed in his responsibility. You see, it is the responsibility of my opponent to show a law from the qur'an which does not lead to peace and why. Let us see now if my opponent was capable of doing so. He says: "Let me quote a few more verses of that perfectly peaceful piece of prose. 2:39, 90: Disbelievers will be burned with fire. 2:104: For disbelievers is a painful doom. 2:178: Believers must retaliate. Those who transgress will have a painful doom. 3:157: If you die fighting for Allah, you'll be rewarded in heaven. 9:5: Slay the idolaters wherever you find them. These are just a very, very small sample of over 500 quotes [1] in the Qu'ran that speak of violence against/endless torture of non-believers simply because they are non-believers. Particularly note 9:5 and 3:157. I'm afraid that I couldn't be clearer. If you follow the Qu'ran, you must 'Slay the idolaters wherever you find them' and 'if you die fighting for Allah, you'll be rewarded in heaven.'" As expected, my opponent fails to present a law from the qur'an which does not establish peace. He quotes from the qur'an several verses, yet at no time does he explain or give any sound logic as to how the verses do not establish peace. Why? Because he can't. If he could, he would have easily done so. The fact that he couldn't expound on the verses in which he quoted is evidence from his own words themself that there is no law in islam which does not establish peace. Now let's analyze the verses to see if peace does get established. You see, every verse in which my opponent quoted are punishments for wrong doing. So that leads to the question, "Is punishing those who do wrong the perfect way to establish peace"? Of course, the answer is yes. To say otherwise would be absurd. I wonder what my opponent would consider be done to a person who rapes or steals or murders. Do you suggest we prescrible for them milk and cookies for their actions? Of course not. It would be foolish. To maintain a peaceful society, these wrongdoers should be punished. For naturally, punishment discourages the person from doing wrong again, which helps to estsblish peace within a society. In short, my opponent failed to produce any law from the qur'an which is not perfect in establishing peace. To the contrary, he helped in proving my point with the verses he quoted, for the verses in which he quoted are punishments for wrong doing, and to punish those who do wrong is the perfect way to establish peace within a society. Then he says: "I don't know how my opponent comes to this conclusion, but it is clearly very silly. A misinterpretation is not intentional. A misinterpretation is a MIStaken INTERPRETATION,..." My opponent couldn' be any more wrong. A misinterpretation by definition is a false definition. Who says so? The dictionary says so. Whether it is done by a mistake or not is irrelevant. Once again, my opponent is wrong. He then says: "Self-defense has nothing to do with establishing peace. Self-defense is when someone attacks you and you defend yourself. I'm not against that. Fighting is a good way of defending yourself." Then the words of my opponent themself is more evidence that supports my argument, not his. For he just stated that fighting is a good way to defend yourself. The problem he has is that for the oddest reason, he states that self-defense has nothing to do with establishing peace. He couldn't be farther from the truth. If someone insisted on fighting you, you would actually try to have a discussion in the midst of the fight? Really? And according to you, this is the perfect way to establish peace? Do I really have to explain how absurd this is? Who new everyone. Attention readers, the next time someone tries to attack you, you shouldn't try to fight them off. This is not the way to bring about peace. Instead, while the person is punching and slapping you around, you should try to have a discussion on why your getting your butt whipped. This is the best way to bring peace. Surely, we can see the nonsense of my opponent's logic. Clearly, fighting in self-defense is the perfect way to establish peace. In conclusion, my opponent has failed to show a law in the qur'an or sunnah which is not perfect in establishing peace. For it is cleary impossible for him to do so, for islam is perfect in establishing peace.