Nicean Trinity against Socinus' Trinity

I concur with my opponent with the said not-so-educated people in Christ just as the scriptures affirm in1 Corinthians 1:26-29.Jesus is both Adonai and YahwehEarly Christians believed Jesus was Yahweh albeit neither the Father nor the Holy Spirit but the Son. In fact, there's an abundant of scriptural evidence that Jesus is Yahweh but i'll just provide these, having been seen it as suffice:John's TestimonyJohn himself wrote this:"Even after Jesus had done all these miraculous signs in their presence, they still would not believe in him. This was to fulfill the word of Isaiah the prophet: ‘Lord, who has believed our message and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?’ For this reason they could not believe, because, as Isaiah says elsewhere: ‘He has blinded their eyes and deadened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts, nor turn-and I would heal them.’Isaiah said this because he saw Jesus' glory [eiden teen doxan autou] and spoke about." John 12:37-41Now read the LXX for yourself:"And it came to pass in the year in which king Ozias died,that I saw the Lord [eidon ton kurion] sitting on a high and exalted throne, and the house was full of his glory [tees doxees autou]. And seraphs stood round about him: each one had six wings: and with two they coveredtheirface, and with two they coveredtheirfeet, and with two they flew. And one cried to the other, and they said, Holy, holy, holy,is theLord of hosts:the whole earth is full of his glory [tees doxees autou]’. And the lintel shook at the voice they uttered, and the house was filled with smoke. And I said, Woe is me, for I am pricked to the heart; for being a man, and having unclean lips, I dwell in the midst of a people having unclean lips; and I have seen with mine eyes the King, the Lord of hosts… And I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go to this people? And I said, behold, I amhere, send me. And he said, Go, and say to this people, Ye shall hear indeed, but ye shall not understand; and ye shall see indeed, but ye shall not perceive.For the heart of this people has become gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them." Isaiah 6:1-5, 8-10 LXXTheglorywhich Isaiah saw in Isa 6:3 was the glory of Yahweh (typically rendered as "Lord" in the OT). Here John speaks of the prophet seeing the glory of Christ since in the next clauseand spoke about him, "him" can hardly refer to Yahweh, but must refer to Christ. On the basis of statements like 1:14 in the prologue, the author probably put no great distinction between the two. Since the author presents Jesus as fully God (cf. John 1:1), it presents no problem to him to take words originally spoken by Isaiah of Yahweh himself and apply them to Jesus.Paul's TestimonyIn Philippians 2:9-11, Paul quoted the Isaiah 45:23-24LXX and points out that Jesus is Yahweh whom all knees should bow and whom all tongue must confess as Yahweh.Wisdom/Logos of GodEven my opponent's desired rendering still favors my stance:The Beginning OF God's creation.What does beginning mean?English Dictionaries define it as:(1) start ; inception(2) source; origin(3) the time when or the place where something begins(4) opening; commencementJohn had envisagedthat the Son is the start OF God's creation which means he is the beginning of God's creation to exist.Otherwise God's creation would be the start,origin,source OF the Son and this is cacophonouslyabsurd.On the LogosThe Greek word " Logos" was used by the Apostles out of evangelistic needs in the contemporary society wherein the they live. The Logos denotes three meanings now:(1) Greek Philosophy - impersonal force/being of nature,reality and rational beings(2) Hebraic Adaptation - personified power of YHWH's interaction and intervention with men.(3) Christian definition - personal entity, the Son per se of the Father.One who is the only offspring who is God as to his nature. The one who exegetes the Father. ( John 1:1,18)The Apostolic church (A.D. 33-100) and the early church (A.D 100-200) believes in the eternal Sonship of the Logos via eternal generation.Your stance about the Logos is purely Greek Philosophy. Historical and Biblical evidence proves that the Johannine Logos is a divine person.Jesus as AngelThe burden of proof is on my opponent because he didn't even qualify and gave substantial evidence that these thousand messengers in Job 33:23 are indeed angelic in nature but rather, my opponent just assumed that it is without contextual evidence.1 Timothy 2:5, when taken in isolation, it'll inevitably prove my opponent's stance but this is not the case, we must interpret the said verse in coherence with the entire scripture as a whole:1 Cor. 8:6 said that the one God is the Father.John 1:1,14 said that Jesus Christ is the Word who was God in the fleshTherefore, we must not merely surmise on this but clearly present the facts.1 Timothy 2:5 talks about the Word in the flesh as the one singular mediator between the Father and humanity ( akin to John 14:6's yet another revelation about Christ).The Angel of YHWH: an angel who is not "ethereal creature" but is very God.Clearly the Angel of Yahweh is a self-manifestation of Yahweh,for He speaks as God, identifies Himself with God, and claims to exercise the prerogatives of God(Gen. 16:7-12; 21:17-18; 22:11-18; Ex. 3:2; Jud. 2:1-4; 5:23; 6:11-24; 13:3-22; 2 Sam. 24:16; Zech. 1:12; 3:1; 12:8). Yet He is distinguished from Yahweh (Gen. 24:7; Zech. 1:12-13). That He is a member of the Trinity is indicated by the fact that the appearances of the Angel of Yahweh cease after the Incarnation.This is confirmed by the Old Testament statement that the Angel of God accompanied Israel when they left Egypt (Ex. 14:19; cf. 23:20) and the New Testament statement that the Rock who followed Israel was Christ (1 Cor. 10:4).I may still agree with my opponent's argument that Jesus is explicitly an angel( from Greek: angelos, messenger) according to Hebrews 1 without resorting to his view.Hebrews 1 is about the great contrast between the birthed Messenger and the created messengers.The birthed Messenger ( Heb 1:5)is the "only-offspring who is God in nature" not an "ethereal creature "( John 1:18), He is the" exact imprint of the Father's nature ( Heb 1:3).pre-Christian trinitiesMy opponent didn't provide evidence of pre-Christian trinities but tritheisms:Trinity- teaching that there's one God:the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.Tritheism- teaching that there's three gods ( e.g. theEgyptian- Amun, Re, Ptah)Post-Nicea & AriusMy opponent must know that not all Trinitarians shares every identical beliefs about other things.For example, we will never find Trinitarians in the 1st,2nd and 3rd centuries murdering heretics. This means that what happened in the 4th century has other considerable factors even if that's within religion.The early church were Trinitarians:StatementThe Son within the Father was birthed out from the womb of his Father's heart anterior to creation. ( Ps. 45:1 LXX, Ps. 110:3, Prov. 8:25,30, 1 Cor. 1:24, Heb. 1:3,5)Meaning of statementThe Son within ( logos endiathetos) was birthed out ( logos prophorikos) from the Father’s substance shortly near the time of creation. In other words, the Son is a Person who is consubstantial to the Father that is why John speaks of the Word as God in nature and was with God in the beginning of creation (John 1:1-3).Conclusion:The Apologists are not far from Athanasius' version of the eternal sonship via eternal generation. This proves that the early church believes in the Trinity, from 2nd to 3rd centuries and that Arianism came into existence in the 4th century.Let us not forget that Arius himself was a Trinitarian before he recanted his faith! Where is his See before his heresy? Where?