Islam should be banned in the United States on the basis of being a death cult, not a religion.

Well, you , in typical fashion, regurgitate the typical BS that is put out by the liberals like ROSIE O DUMBELL "radical Christianity is as dangerous as radical Islam" Ok lets totally pick apart your arguments (1) an attack on Islam is necessarily an attack on Muslims themselves, either physical - as in the bombing of a mosque that offends or kills Muslims what are you implying here? that WE and our armed forces BOMB MUSLIMS? HA! Who do you think bombed the golden shrine in Samarra? how about the markets? how about the trains in India and England and Spain? who killed Bhutto today and tried the other month, killing hundreds of innocent muslims in the procession of well wishers, by strapping a bomb to a baby and offering the baby toward her ? who has perpatrated the 10255 terror attacks (that we know about) since 9/11, and the 34 that happened last week alone? Answer : MUSLIMS next argument by you ------- The whole point here, and the foundation for my perspective in the debate, is that when you say you are attacking Islam, you are actually attacking Muslims. This effectively means that, in calling the religion a "death cult," you are also claiming that its members behave like they are in a death cult. What else could you mean, right? Yes this is precisely what I mean Who straps bombs to their kids, has then blow themselves up, murder dozens of innocents, then proclaim them are a martyr, afford them the highest possible honor, and say that they will have 72 virgins to defile when they get to Satan? Uhmmmmmmmm - Muslims ! If this isnt a death cult, a cult that worships death, I dont know what is your next argument Religious intolerance is not peculiar to Muslims; it is something almost inherent in all genuine votaries. In fact, Christianity has probably been the most intolerant religion in human history. The mass violence committed in the name of Islam pales to that committed in the name of Christianity. Ok here you are just plain wrong, and I will point out two different angles. #1 Islam has been far more violent in history than Christianity- even at its worst Something happened to turn good men bad. For the first 3,000 years of recorded history the Bedouins of Arabia were self-reliant, peace- and freedom-loving peoples. They conquered no one. Then at the dawn of the seventh century everything changed. These Arabs, now Muslims, became the planet's most ruthless militants. They conquered the civilized world, plundering and taxing it for booty. They left oceans of blood and dictatorial tyrannies in their wake. Christianity civilized the world. Agents of Christ teaching about one God and his son and the teachings of love, compassion and helping others, sacrificed their compfortable lives to go to places afar where savagery, cannibalism and many Gods ruled, and told them of a different way- they taught reading and writing, how to farm, and the formation of fair and rational government. Judeo-Christian values civilized the world, and taught their is something HIGHER than man. #2 Violence committed in the name of Christ is CONTRARY to what he taught, and it is in COMPLETE ACCORD with the teachings of Mohammed Islam is a caustic blend of regurgitated paganism and twisted Bible stories. Muhammad, its lone prophet, conceived his religion solely to satiate his lust for power, sex, and money. He was a terrorist. Christ was an enlightened being that taught to love, compassion, and to turn the other cheek against violence. He never hurt a flea, or told anyone to, and quite the contrary, taought the opposite of violence, lust, and greed. You are simply spewing the garbage that you are fed from the liberal media, who hate Christians and their conservative values. Ditto for public school teachers for the most part. your next absurd point ----------------- The primary mistake that you are making here, however, is in equating the entire religion - its people and their tenets, rituals, and practices - with the absurd actions of a few extremists (terrorists). The vast majorities of Muslims are not terrorists and do not support terrorist actions this is, again, more liberal nonsense poppy cock - here is some education How Many Muslims Are Terrorists? I am often asked to guess as to how many Muslims are jihadists. The easiest answer is: enough to commit the terrorist acts detailed in the 1,000-page-long Islamic Terror Timeline. http://www.prophetofdoom.net... The most logical way to determine the percentage of Muslims who are salafi/fundamentalists - a precondition to jihad - is to consider the most recent elections in Islamic countries. For example, the fundamentalist Islamic group HAMAS received 65% of the popular vote in "Palestine." The somewhat secular Fatah, at least by comparison to HAMAS, won only 30% of the votes. The newly elected fundamentalist Islamic nutcase ruling Iran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, earned 62% of the popular vote. The most moderate Islamic challenger garnered less than twenty percent support. If the 60% response levels derived from polling data is an accurate reflection of the current state of Islam, then sex and age criteria further reduce Islamic terrorist candidates down to a maximum of one in every seven Muslims - 25% of 60%. That means that no more than 15% of the total Islamic population of 1.2 to 1.5 billion people has the potential to be a terrorist should the opportunity arise. That equates to a minimum of 180 million potential jihadists and a maximum of 225 million. But when it comes to actual jihadists, to those who have or will commit an act of terrorism in Allah's name, my research suggests that they represent no more than one in one hundred of the 180 million young fundamentalist Muslim men prepared mentally, morally, and spiritually to be terrorists. That means that there are 1.8 million actual Islamic jihadists on the planet today - a number which could jump one hundred fold almost instantaneously should the opportunity arise. Before you get a warm and cozy feeling, thinking that only 60% of Muslims are sufficiently indoctrinated in fundamentalist Islam to be a terrorist should the opportunity arrise, and that only 25% of those Muslims are the appropriate age and sex to actually engage in jihad, let's consider some recent historical events. In 1917, less than 3% of Russians were Communists. Yet since that 3% was sufficiently corrupted by an immoral and ruthless religion (Socialist Secular Humanism), they quickly came to oppress the entire nation - murdering 30 million Russians in the process. In 1924, less than 3% of Germans were Nazis. And yet since that 3% was sufficiently corrupted by Hitler's "People's Religion" as it was immorally and ruthlessly laid out in Mein Kampf, that 3% came to oppress the entire nation and led the world into a war that killed 50 million people. Also keep in mind that while only 15% of Muslims are potential jihadists today, that percentage is growing rapidly. Thanks to OPEC funding and clerical indoctrination, the Islamic world is becoming increasingly fundamentalist. In twenty years most Muslims could be terrorists - and probably will be. your final point----------------------------------------- Eschewing the problem of "one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter," terrorist actions are not solely inspired by religion. Just for everyone's knowledge, there are also plenty of Christian terrorist groups, so it's not like terrorism is confined to Muslims. Clearly, however, the answer is more complicated than you are portraying: religion is not the only instigator here OK, GENIUS. OTHER THAN ISLAM, PLEASE GIVE ME REASONS WHY MUSLIMS KILL, TERRORIZE, RAPE, SUPPRESS WOMEN, THREATEN OTHERS, HIJACK PLANES, ETC. After all ,THEY say that the Qu-ran and Allah is 100% why