My Opponent Will Not Mention Cats in this Debate

Reverse Psychology: No matter what you say about the Lady Gaga album analogy, you are still forgetting one thing- No matter what you say and up to this current point, I still haven’t said the word (s) which would cause me to lose this debate and you to win. Even if that example really was an example of reverse psychology. You still haven’t actually shown how I would say the word which I said I wouldn’t- It is also impossible to draw a conclusion from this to say that I will somehow be convinced to say the word which I said I wouldn’t. Therefore, your argument for reverse psychology Is invalid either way given the fact that I still am maintaining my position in this debate. So therefore because I haven’t said that word (or plural form) I am winning so far and I very well intend to stay like that. “Because you like a good challenge?” No, I accepted this debate because it seemed like a fairly straightforward topic and quite the opposite of “challenging”. So once again, I shall reiterate what I have said before (and still remains uncontested) : If reverse psychology were to be true, why on earth would I accept the debate upon reading and acknowledgement of the debate title and resolution if I knew that I would just end up falling victim to the effects of reverse psychology and therefore say the word which I said that I wouldn’t? “NO” argument: Ok fine, I will say no once more to the poor animal. *looks at the feline animal* Mr. Feline, NO. There, I said no. Now your argument is once more invalid. Moving on… 3rd argument: My opponent has dropped all my rebuttals against his argument Predictions Argument: My opponent said that he made a prediction predicting that I would utilise a certain meme in this debate supposedly called the “Pirate, You cheated” meme. And now he claims that I have used that certain “meme” and now believes that he has the “epic power of true prediction”. My opponent has introduced a major flaw into his argument- This is not a meme! This is a gif. A gif is an animated image formatted to be on an infinite loop. A meme is not something which is animated and formatted to be on an infinite loop… otherwise it would be a gif. http://dustn.tv... Furthermore, to help prove that the “gif” above is indeed a gif, all you have to do is right click on the gif and then it will take you to a save option box (don’t actually save the gif though) and at the bottom it will class the file type of that “Gif” as a gif image. This is the proof to show that the above gif is in fact a gif and not a .png or .Jpeg file (which gifs can’t be saved as but memes can) Now let’s assume hypothetically that 9Spaceking did intend to call “You cheated, Pirate” a gif- The gif which I have used does include the words “you cheated” and “pirate” but it is not appropriate or accurate to call it the “Pirate, You cheated” because If you have seen the first Pirates of The Caribbean (from which the gif is based from), you would know that the “you cheated” part is said first, then the “Pirate” part (Don’t believe me? If so, please refer to the YouTube video attached to my argument).Therefore, it would be improper to call the gif “Pirate, you cheated”. Ergo, it would only be logical to see the gif which you predicted to be used, to be something different to the gif which I had used. To make such a reckless error makes me question the credibility of 9spaceking’s prediction skills. Now from this, we can conclude that Spaceking’s prediction skills http://www.youtube.com... definitely not as good nor accurate as he has made it out to be. But seeing as spaceking was not aware of these flaws, he then carried to say with such great confidence that I will mention and say the word that I said I wouldn’t. “I am the master of prediction.” Oh really? If you are the master prediction, then you should be predicting that I will not mention the word I said I wouldn’t mention. You might as well drop your “master prediction” argument now to save yourself the embarrassment of later finding out that your predictions of me losing are in fact wrong, inaccurate and indeed false. : p Argument 4: I can assure you that I am not an assassin nor do I ever intend to practise the arrangement of an assassination of anyone. So don’t worry 9Spaceking, I don’t ever intend to have or want you to be assassinated by anything… especially by a feline… You have no proof for me being an assassin. I will extend my rebuttals in the next round. Why all my opponent’s arguments have failed: Why im winning so far:1. I have not fallen victim to reverse psychology by Spaceking yet (attempts to make me say the word (synonym=feline)).2. I have resisted the supposed “cuteness” and “awesomeness” of feline animals.3. Even if I am an assassin, even If I do ever collaborate with Felines and kill you, I still won’t mention the forbidden word. Right now, I am not an assassin (I never have been) and I have so far not mentioned the forbidden word. You have to remember that no matter what my opponent says i.e an assassin etc etc, all of his arguments will only be valid if I DO mention the word that I said I wouldn’t- Spaceking would win. But! If I do manage to not mention the word that I said I wouldn’t, then Spaceking’s arguments would all be false and invalid therefore causing him to have not have upheld the BOP- I would therefore win the debate. Because I have so far done what I was originally meant to do, all of spaceking;s arguments are not valid and are null – despite how “logical” they may be. So, If I wanted, I could just say “moving on” in R4 and I would still be winning (assuming that I haven’t mentioned the forbidden word by that point) even if you did to make more argument points. The resolution is this: MY OPPONENT WILL NOT MENTION X IN THIS DEBATE. <- "X" representing the word I said I would not mention. I am pro, I am for this resolution. My opponent is con. He has full BOP but has not upheld it given the fact that pro is currently affirming the resolution. “moving on” :p