The Proof of the non-existence of God

Pro said:"It takes along to adjust to something we all thought wasn’t possible. My point was made very clear. That is Salvation threw reason."Answer: I'll ignore the terrible syntax. Your point is that salvation comes through reasoning. I disagree. Nobody ever stopped being human by the power of their own will. This doesn't disprove God.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:"Faith is would we should do when we got nothing else less."Answer: Again, your syntax is giving me nose bleeds. Your point is, when we have no other options, we resort to faith.That's true. I agree. That doesn't disprove God. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:"You see part of the demonstration of the evolution of ideas was to show that is through rational inquiry we find our answers."Answer: Disagree. We don't find answers through radical inquiry. Radical inquiry is part of the process, but it's not the source of the answer. That's like saying:" To feed myself, I think really hard about food." You will never get answers if you all you do is ask questions. You will never eat, if you only think about food. It requires.....(drum roll)......actions.Again, not proof for the non-existence of God.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:"You see that is The True scientific method is that 99.% of scientist don’t know either. It can be applied in anyway not just the physical world."Answer: I'm guessing that's supposed to mean that "we can apply the scientific method to more than just physical science."? Of course we can. Psychology, Sociology and Economics all have measurable statistics.How does this disprove God?---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:"That I put my ideas to be tested, we could call it a theory and my opponent pointing out flaws in attempt to foil them but inadvertently pointing out were I needed to adjust it, until it reached perfection. The proof I was looking for."Answer: You haven't perfected it. All you've said is:" Aha! It is perfected." So, now disprove God.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:" This must take the wind out of his Fundamentalism, for he helped me prove his own fundamentalism wrong. That is what I mean by The Art of Foolery. ;)"Answer: Yea man. You got me good. If only you would take your Ritalin and FOCUS! You got no proof against God.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:"Secondary, I am a transcendental idealist, which means I work to explain the world within a mental framework without having to appeal to a physical world at all.(warning, not to be confuse with the imagination.)"Answer: What are you even talking about? You disproved God in your mind without using imagination? Did you just admit to having a lobotomy?ALL CONSCIOUS THOUGHT IS SYNONIMOUS WITH IMAGINATION.Dictionary.com definition of imagination: the action or process of forming such images or concepts.Synonyms ingenuity, enterprise, thought The scientific method requires "observed, tested and repeatable data". --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pro said:"What people consider physical world I translate it into a frame work of mind, because the mind is the necessary condition of seeing the external world, for to claim otherwise is to claim that you are out of your mind. ;)" Answer: schiz·o·phre·ni·a  <span style="font-size: small;"><strong><a onmousedown="spk(this,{lk:'nx1fkx',en:'wotdau',io:'0',b:'wotd',tp:'lrl',m:'wotdau'})" href="#"></a><a target="_blank" href="http://dictionary.reference.com/audio.html/lunaWAV/S01/S0173000"><img border="0" src="http://sp.dictionary.com/dictstatic/g/d/speaker.gif"></a></strong></span>  /ˌskɪt səˈfri ni ə, -ˈfrin yə/ Show Spelled[skit-suh-free-nee-uh, -freen-yuh] noun 1. Psychiatry . Also called dementia praecox. a severe mental disorder characterized by some, but not necessarily all, of the following features: emotional blunting, intellectual deterioration, social isolation, disorganized speech and behavior, delusions, and hallucinations. 2. a state characterized by the coexistence of contradictory or incompatible elements. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:"To quote from the bible is to not recognize the argument which completely discredits any faith based truth which includes that the bible really speaks the word of god."Answer: Buddy, you can't just eliminate a source, just because you don't like it. Try that in court sometime." Nah, I'm not guilty. Law is relative."As I've said before, you would prefer that God doesn't exist. You eliminate all aspects of God within your definition, so that you don't have to disprove them. THAT, is a turtle shell defense. Wouldn't you have to START disproving the Bible before you even try to disprove God? The Bible is the evidence for God's existance. You never once addressed it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pro said:"The arguments are complete and sound. The Proof has been logically demonstrated and credit should be given where credit is due. Remember ALL THREE HAVE TO BE SHOWN WRONG. And number three is undeniable A FATAL BLOW/"Answer: You haven't proved anything. Not a single FACT has come to light. Not one reference is used. No support exists for your idea. Everything you mentioned comes from your own mind, which you cannot accurately express. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:"If my opponent which is to reformulate his ideas and challenge me again. Or wants to argue about relativism you challenge will always be accepted." Answer: Dude, I need therapy after dealing with you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said: It is not about winning, this was a challenge to see If my ideas could pass the test and with the help of my partner/opponent we made it happen.Answer: I'm sure you're quite convinced of your success. The next time they let you out of your padded cell, play some checkers. This doesn't suit you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pro said:"It was a pleasure !!!"Answer: No....no it wasn't. Also, we still have closing arguments to make. I'm going to heavily focus on abnormal psychology sources in mine. What sources will you be using?------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------