God Most Likely Exists

I never stated an initial position about souls. In deed the first time i mentioned them was to say that there is only one soul. Now what seems to be the issue here so that "con" doesnt understands my arguments or what they have to do with gods tells me that "con" isnt familiarized with oriental philosophy. And a person that is very engaged in the western way of speaking, thinking and looking at what god might be. Also "con" doesnt seem to be reading my arguments to understand but to answer back. (And i know that this is a debate but if one is not open to change its position how can he expect to find out who is right?) "Then some more about death, then something about us being a single energy. What any of this has to do with God is beyond me." - Con. This supports what im saying that "con" doesnt tries to understand the other one way of seeing the universe. But now lets think for a moment. What can death have to do with god? What could be the importance of nothingness? What does the concept of everybody being one can possibly have to do with god? It seems tha I will have to explain this in a more clear way and stop expecting for "con" to figure it out. But i want to start with something else that "Con" pointed out. ""Time needs a starting point for god to exist" Why does god also need to have a starting point? Asking who created god then or how was it created would be the same thing as asking who created time and how it was created. Death is always related to god. At the matter of fact he is who created life so death is also atributed to god. God is connected to life, life implies death, life implies beheaviour that implies enviroment that implies a universe. All this thigns are not separated events they are like the sides of a dice. Nothingness. A tricky subject. We in deed will become nothing at somoe point. You cant be nothing unless there was a point were you were something and the other way around. It still ties to you cant have death without life and light without dark. So after we die we become nothing. We have no past no present and no future, for ever and for never because you cant have a sense of time when you are nothing. There isnt even time because nothing is nnothing at all. And nothing is something necessary because it is the other side of being. What im talking about is buddhist Zen or Taoism. But lets try to do it on what is the normal way of arguing. Statement: There is one "god" who is everything and has always been here and will always be here. Time: The only time tthat exists is now. Time starts now and ends now, those are the boundaries of time. We can use the past to explain this just like using the wwakes of a ship to explain where it was in the ocean but after some distance they dissapear into the whole ocean. Therefore you can only explain things tha happen now. Life and death are not two separated things they are both the same thing expressed in different ways. And you cant have one without the other. Then who is "I"? A way in wich the universse or god centers itself in itself so it feels as a separated thing because the sens of "self" or "I" involves a sense of "other". The universe xperiencing itself. The universe = god= energy =It =Everything/Nothing