The Christian bible and god are responsible for the presence of morality

Though I concur that the absence of the Bible would not entirely eradicate the presence of morality, in all fairness, my opponent should not disregard the fact that the Bible and the Christian principles are prevalent assets that contribute significantly to the perpetual existence of morality. Excluding the Bible from society would drastically reduce the number of conscientious individuals. Since my opponent is a heretic, it is easy for him to refute my assertion, using his personal experience toward achieving this objective. For instance, my opponent can say that he is a moral heretic, yet his morality is not derived from the Bible and therefore the Bible does not necessary instills moral judgment in an individual consciousness. Arguing from this point of view will defeat the entire purpose of the debate, and this is the sole reason why my first sentence admits that the Bible would not (I put great emphasis on these words) entirety eradicate the presence of morality. Therefore, instead of arguing from a personal perspective, the argument should incorporate society as a whole. Let"s argue from a view point which will easily allow everyone to judge our arguments fairly. In other words, let"s use empirical facts to support our arguments. My contention is that yes, to a great extent, Christianity is responsible for the presence of morality. Comparing nation that have a Christian majority to those that have a Christian minority in its population will illustrate that the absence of Christianity increases the probability of immoral practices. First, let's consider the most totalitarian and perhaps the most barbarous perpetrator of wickedness in the world: North Korea. According to the New York Times, a study by a special United Nation Commission has produced shocking indictment against North Korea, "crimes against humanity including murder, enslavement, torture, rape, forced abortions and persecution on political, racial and religious grounds." According to the finding of the U.N. Commission, witnesses told "gruesome tales, including of guards clubbing starving children to death for stealing rice." And that "women are forcibly trafficked from North Korea to China for forced marriages and prostitution." Similar atrocities are practice in Syria, where the government uses chemical weapons to kill "nearly 1,500 civilians, including at least 426 children." CNN broadcasted the depiction of children, laying stiffly on the ground, foaming after being viciously attack by chemical weapons. Furthermore, in Saudi Arabia citizens who criticize the government are convicted to death and mercilessly beheaded. In Pakistan Women are killed for advocating equal rights of education. Malala Yousafzai, the youngest-ever Nobel Prize recipient, was shot in her head by the Taliban for supporting female education. A fundamental similarity between these countries that practices the most deplorable form of oppression and horrendousness is that they have a Christian minority population. Now, I kindly ask my opponent to cite countries, with a Christian majority population, that practice similar atrocities to the countries mentioned above. To the contrary, the countries that perform the most altruism are Christian majority countries. To illustrate, I will cite a few occasion of these humanitarian aids. The U.S., a Christian majority country, was the first nation to assist in the outbreak of Ebola in Africa. When ISIS was slathering civilians in Iraq, forcing them to the take refuge in the mountain, Britain, Australia, and the United State, three Christian majority countries, saved these civilians by dropping food and water on the mountain. These moral efforts were enforced by Christian majority countries. The simple fact that the atrocities that are practice in North Korea, Pakistan, and other countries in the Middle East do not occur in Christian majority countries is empirical evidence that, to a great extent, Christianity enforces morality.