There is more evidence that God does not exist, than there to is prove that he does.

On my theory of infinite Universes, you argued that God must still have created the very first Universe. But the whole point of an infinite number of Universes is that there was no "first" Universe. Just like I can count 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. .. . etc, I can also count -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6 and go on forever. Do you see? There is no first number, just as there would have been no first Universe. Also on the theory of a Multiverse, you said, "There is no evidence whatsoever for this theory, thus it is not valid. " Well the exact same can be said for the theory of God. I was very glad to read that you agree with me that there is a possibility that the Universe was created by chance. That was my point. You then asked me if I believe in what is probable or improbable. Well, it is highly improbable to me that the Universe was created and is controlled by an eternal being who has the power to do anything, then spends his time doing nothing. You have asked me to explain how Islam could not exist without Christianity. Well, the complete Bible was finished several centuries before the Qur'an was. And the Qur'an mentions passages from the Bible a few times. Islam is therefore a follow up religion. Imagine that you made a film about a man who swims around the world. Then imagine that hundreds of years later, I made another film about a different man who also swims around the world. Who would you say had the original idea? I asked you why God creates people who do not believe in him. You replied, "It's by your own free will who don't believe in him". This is nonsense. If God is omnipotent, then we have no free will, do we? You said, "if some people never hear this message (meaning the concept of religion), they will be given a second chance in the afterlife. " I don't wish to insult you or your religion, but it seems that Islam, quite conveniently, has all the angles covered, just in case one day, someone might challenge it. Your answers are not convincing me, sorry. When I asked if God could make 2 and 2 add up to 5, you answered, "Yes, because he is omnipotent. " I don't really have much to say about this, except that everybody knows that this is impossible to do. There is no mathematical or scientific way to achieve it. To say "yes" is a laughable answer. Your answer to my question concerning Ancient Egyptians and Greeks is also unacceptable. You are telling me that people went back in time, thousands of years to spread the word of God as he is known in Islam? Impossible to prove. I also question your remarks about the Greeks, didn't they worship Zeus, among others? How can you be sure that Zeus is not the real God? As for your final answer, " God can, if he wants, choose not to know something", I'm sorry, but this is a ridiculous answer, that suggests even if there were a God, he is useless and pointless. It comes down to this. .. I am openly saying that I don't know whether or not there is a God. My opponent is saying that he KNOWS there is a God. As he is the one making the claim, it is up to him to provide the evidence. So far he has not provided me with enough to convince me of God's existence. My opponent has provided, just as I have, opinions. Nothing more than guesses and estimates, even though he is saying that he knows God exists. He clearly does not know. He believes. A belief is not a fact. I want to leave you all with this final thought, which I made in one of the earlier rounds - God is a temporary answer that is accepted by some, until definitive evidence can be found to prove his existence is false. Thank you.