Jesus cannot be Messiah

R5.Con.1 - Too many untrue premises - but Regardless, none of the Arguments Would Necessarily Exclude Jesus as Messiah :I feel that Pro's argument is intended to : 1. Argue that Isaiah 53 is NOT a Messianic Prophecy; 2. Argue that "Servant pertains to "Israel" - and not Specifically the Messiah.In either case - IF TRUE - then, this has NO effect on whether any of the OTHER prophecies in Isaiah, (let alone the rest of Scripture), necessarily exclude Jesus as the Messiah.Even-So - I will try to briefly explain why the arguments are invalid ...R5.Con.2 - "Seed" in both Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek - is a Metaphor for Descendants, or a Specific Descendant :In Re. R5.Pro - Premises Regarding "Seed" : He shall see his seed. No where in the N.T is the Church called Christ's seed." They're called his bride, but never his seed. No where in OT are humans called God's seed. Sons, sure.never seed. Seed suggests CUM, god can't cum, god has no seed.Galatians 3:16 - Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed (σπ^1;ρματι | spermati). He does not say, “And to seeds (σπ^1;ρμασιν | spermasin),” as referring to many, but rather to one, “And to your seed (σπ^1;ρματ^3; | spermati),” that is, Christ.Galatians 3:29 - And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s descendants (σπ^1;ρμα | sperma), heirs according to promise.Isaiah 41:8 - “But you, Israel, My servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, Descendant (Hebrew : זֶ֖רַע | zerah; Greek : σπP51;ρμα | sperma) of Abraham My friend;Targum Jonathan, Isaiah 1:4 - My people, called a beloved seed, (בְזַרעָא רְחִימָא)I do not know what the relevance of Pro's premises are : but regardless - none of these are true.R5.Con.3 - Linguistically, Historically - It is Valid to interpret "Servant" as the Messiah; According to JEWISH authorities :In Re. R5.Pro - Isaiah 49:5-7 servant called "servant to rulers", Israel subjected to various rulers.In Re. R5.Pro - Isaiah 52:13 every single time the servant is Israel, why get goofy now?In Re. R5.Pro - In Scripture - especially in prophetic passages, the "Servant" referred to a single person - so why get goofy now?R5.Con.3.1 - "Servant" is Extremely Equivocated in ALL of Hebrew Scripture, not just Isaiah :Gen 26:24 - Moses, my Servant2 Samuel 3:18 - David, my ServantIsaiah 20:3 - Isaiah, my ServantIsaiah 22:20 - My servant EliakimIsaiah 37:37 - My servant DavidEzekiel 37:25 - forever; and David My servant will be their prince forever.Malachi 4:4 - Moses, my ServantR5.Con.3.2 - Servant - in Isaiah 49 - is CLEARLY DISTINCT from "Jacob/Israel", not the same :Isaiah 49:3 - He said to Me, “You are My Servant, Israel, In Whom I will show My glory.” .... Isaiah 49:5 - And now says the Lord, who formed Me from the womb to be His Servant, To bring Jacob back to Him, so that Israel might be gathered to Him (For I am honored in the sight of the Lord, And My God is My strength),R5.Con.3.3 - Jewish Authorities Interpreting "Servant" to mean "The Messiah" & Not a Christian Bias:It is one thing - to look back 2-3 thousand years at ancient texts and speculate how to interpret them; But, it is an entirely different thing to see how people 2-3 thousand years ago interpreted the those texts - for themselves ...It goes without saying that the New Testament IS A JEWISH commentary - WRITTEN BY JEWS - of Hebrew/Aramaic/Greek versions of the Tanakh. But - what about Jewish opinion before and after that period :R5.3.3.1 - Rabbinic Opiniona :Rashi's Commentary on Isaiah 49:6 - And He said, “It is too light for you to be, etc.”: In My eyes, it is too small a gift that you should have this alone, that you be My servant to establish Jacob and to bring back to Me the besieged of Israel, and behold I add more to you, “And I will make you a light for the nations,” to prophesy concerning the downfall of Babylon, which will be a joy for the whole world. and the besieged of Israel: Heb. וּנְצוּרֵי. Comp. (Prov. 7:10) “With a heart surrounded by evil thoughts (וּנְצֻרַת),” that their heart is surrounded by the inclination of sinful thoughts, like a city besieged by a bulwark of those who besiege it.R5.Con.3.3.2 - Targum Jonathan on Isaiah (Circa 50 BCE) - The Oldest and MOST Authoritative Jewish INTERPRETATION of Isaiah :http://juchre.org... (Granted - I don't agree with all of it's translations - but a few "notable" mentions ...)Targum Jonahthan - Isaiah 43:10 - אַת@309;ן סָהְדִין קְֹדָמַי אְמַר יוי וְעַבדִי מְשִיחָא | You all are my witnesses says the Lord, and my servant [the] Messiah.Targum Jonathan - Isaiah 52:13 - הָא יַצלַח עַבדִי מְשִיחָא | Behold, my servant the Messiah will prosper.Targum Jonathan - Isaiah 53:11 - And it was the pleasure of the Lord to refine and to purify the remnant of His people, in order to cleanse their souls from sin, that they might see the kingdom of their Messiah.R5.Con.4 - To sum this last argument and every argument that I have made : 1. Even Jewish Authorities are ambiguous on whether or not the Messiah would come through Solomon or Nathan.2. Even Jewish Authorities assert that the Messiah would come through BOTH - as is reflected in the two different genealogies of Jesus.3. The most Ancient Jewish Authorities affirm that "Servant" in Isaiah - was a reference to the Messiah, and not Israel as a whole.4. Jeconiah's curse was apparently reversed through the faithfulness of his grandson Zerubbabel; 5. Any apparent requirement to rely on ambiguous interpretations regarding Solomon or Nathan are in no way conclusive; 6. Even if it were conceded that Isaiah chapters 40+ had nothing to do with the Messiah - then Jesus couldn't possibly be excluded as the Messiah based on texts that have nothing to do with the Messiah; 7. Any argument relying on the premise that "seed" does not imply descendant(s) fails because this is inc, literally - (as sperm) to exclude Jesus - couldn't possibly prevail, because this is incredibly unsubstantiated and contradicted by nearly every instance of this term in the texts.Vote CON!!!