Google needs to get off Youtube

Ok final round. i promise round 5 will be my last response. unless my opponent uses his round 5 for another argument. again i hope you will all forgive my public forum debate style. i would like to use this round as my final focus, to summarize the debate up to this point, and then tell you why it is better, here in the "con world", where google does not leave youtube, things are better. but first, a few brief touch ups on the contentions and rebuttals. 1) google staying will lead to more events like the rewinds, the music awards and geek week. this we both seem to agree on. now about companies flagging videos. ITS NOT GOOGLE FAULT. google cannot legally do anything. this is why i keep saying google is trying to fix it. to quote my opponent. "Businesses flagging videos doesn't even grant youtube money, it grants the business who flagged the video money. " he is absolutely right, youtube/ google doesn't get anything. THEY ARENT DOING IT ON PURPOSE. google doesn't like to just torture their youtube partners. they just have to work around the legality. if google were to leave youtube would have to work around the same problems but they wouldn't have the money an authority that google brings. and with a loss of money that youtube would face, they would have to fire some people at youtube. or they are going to downgrade youtube A LOT. and the drop in money, we agree on this youtube will lose money, I'm not worried about google losing money after they hypothetically leave. and when youtube loses money we get a down graded version of youtube. a much less fun version of youtube. google leaving would cause a loss of money, which means less fun events, less tools and a primitive version of youtube. my opponent said "And much smaller versions? Eh, just because those are gone doesn't ruin Youtube in the slightest" essentially saying that won't happen cause it won't, which is a logical fallacy of circular argument. and for the part where my opponent said that youtube can just fix themselves, i will really hit on this point later in the debate. 2) google+ is very useful. the only reason people don't think it is useful is because they still feel angst from the days where bob and his army could run around freely in the comment section. now that, that is fixed the comments are relevant to the video things are un arguably better. its just leftover angst. the comment section has more censoring plus has more tools like hashtaging, +someone, and a comment translator. and best part. if people like my opponent don't like it. just make a regular comment like a regular person. but those of us who strive for a better future for youtube actually use all the tools to make better comments. video responses are still here. but my opponent said somethings are gone. like what? things were only added. as for forced integration, my opponent is just looking at it wrong. its not force integration it is just changing the sign up system so its google+ which is really good for youtube, as i will explain later. drastic change? ramp up censorship in the comments so that bob and his army is gone. youtube should share somethings with Facebook. youtube is a community. so we have to stay connected. Facebook is intagrated into so many things and thats what we want to happen to google+, and in turn bringing new members to youtube. as for the video gamers. they lose money because they don't do things right. pew die pie doesn't have trouble because he does it right. and again, NOT GOOGLES FAULT. blame the actual companies who work around the law. blame the law because it allows it. 3) and i don't care what happens to google. but them leaving youtube would be detimetntal to youtube. thats what I've been getting at. but them staying means that they can use their popularity to make youtube bigger and better. 1) working on it 2) yes their is. look at runaway thoughts on youtube. they use video responses 3) just using that as a rebuttal 4) it is fixed, i. e. bob is gone, spam has decreased, and hateful comments have decreased. and how on earth do you use comments for greed? answer is you can't and it is a dumb point rebuttals 1) well then they greatly helped. i just use bob as my example of spam. but googles new comment section has decreased all forms of spam. also when i say you tuber i am referring to youtube partners. like angry joe and shane Dawson. not regular members. 2)I've addressed this a lot. not googles fault. the only reason it happens now. is that because google bought youtube, companies start to realize the power of youtube. now if google leaves youtube has to fight it off without the money of google. my final FINAL focus: this is the way websites work. for example twitter. twitter is not profitable. buuuuut the company is worth so much that someone can buy it and help twitter out. thats the way things work. websites build an audience, which twitter and youtube have done. now a company buys it and makes it profitable and makes it better. thats how it works, and i get how change is scary, but we need to move forward and accept the good changes that google has brought. i understand the past angs that we have felt because of bob. forced integration, I'm so sorry for all the new tools that you are forced to have the option to use. the only real argument my opponent had was the copyright, and i shut that down time and time again in this debate. its not googles fault. so lets look at the hypothetical pro world and the con world that we are heading into: Pro world: google leaves and youtube loses money. everything down grades, and we no longer have fun events like the music awards and geek week. we have companies running down youtube to no end because youtube doesn't have the authority to fight them off con world (my world and the world we are heading towards if we all just calm down): google integration brings in new members and new revenue. we have plenty of new events like geek week. and most importantly new tools make youtube more fun for everyone.