father christmas is real and alive

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now, in terms of the argument, my opponent has repeatedly failed to PROPERLY address/rebutt all of my points presented in R2, and R3, and the following points are hat he has failed to address into this argument so far, therefore if no argument against these points are presented, then he has dropped all the arguments, therefore all of my points are correct. 1. ) How can you prove that father Christmas is around for a long time? 2. ) You have never sourced any accurate website/book/magazine that proves your evidence as valid. 3. ) You have not yet proven that "Father Christmas" is alive and real, as now you are geting off topic about tapping hooves, sleigh marks-yet you fail to even identy to me and the audience, who this person known to you as 'father Christmas' is, and how reindeer hoof tapping, and sleigh marks have anything to do with this 'father Christmas'. Not everyone here knows who father christmas is, so I will be a person who knows nothing about christmas-your speaking jibberish so far as your terms that I can't understand like father christmas, have not been defined therefore I will make up my own personal meaning for father christmas: A car made of snow. Because my opponent has not defined the noun known as father christmas, then I have helped my opposition by defining this noun, therefore I'm now arguing both sides. Father Christmas now means a car made of snow, unless my opponent proves otherwise. 4. ) Irrelevant arguments: Self explanitory. If you don't get it, then please deactive your account and go outside :) 5. ) Horrible grammar-In case you do not know, (which you probably do not,) voters vote on this debate based on GRAMMAR AND SPELLING, and other topics. So yeah, it does matter and your insult towards me as in R4 you call me 'hypocritical', whereas I am helping the voters since you apparently have never voted before, or just do not get the voting system. Also, voters vote on conduct so you might want to watch the insults :( 6. ) Finally, my opponent has defined when this holiday known as 'Christmas', is celebrated, as he says and defines when this takes place in R4, as ". .. midle of summer. ." so for everyone in the audience who is not christian, (which I believe my opposition fails to consider, as he automatically considers everyone in this debate a pure christian, and is discriminating and by saying "what time of the year do you expect the night before christmas to be" he insults everyone in this debate and discriminates against those who do not know what Christmas is, but I can conclude that since the night before Christmas is defined by my opponent as in "middle of summer" then I can expect Christmas to be in the summer as well. 7. ) Again in r4 my opponent does not prove to us that reindeer have hooves, and just like previously when I stated that this holds as much validity as me saying "I am the sun, and my word superior therefore this statement is valid", as they both hold the same example of complete dumbness from the speaker, as my opponent fails to understand how to read my rebuttals, as this statement is directed towards other one of my opponents insults as he says, "It appears that my opponent fails to understnd that reindeer have hooves and that hooves make noise. " Again, I fail to see how father christmas is real and alive because my opponents superior, unlying word, (for those of you who don't know irony, my opponents invalid, false statements of feelings and opinions made to look like fact,) declares that animals have hooves and hooves make noise, which again he fails to define how these hooves make noise, (singing? talking? dancing? it coud be anything, ladies and gentlemen,) and unless this 'father christmas' is a reindeer, I fail to see how this is relevant to a human being, and how reindeer might be associated with 'father christmas', as my opponent yet again does not prove how reindeer have anything to do with 'chist-mas' which is the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ, not tapping hooves! 8. ) My opponent states, "My opponent also fails to understand that debate is about Santa Clause and not my spelling mistakes. " and I would like to say this back to my opposition, but fxing the structure of the sentence, "My opposoition fails to understand that this debate is full of irrelevant, lying, baseless, and insults coming from pro, and does not understand HOW to debate it seems, unless my opponent can show more 'skillful' arguments. " Don't worry if you don't understand what i'm saying pro, i'm sure the voters will, and thats all that really matters. Do I really have to go any further? If your a viewer, it's plainly obvious how irrelevant and invalid my opponents arguments are, and EVERY SINGLE ARGUMENT OF MINE HAS NOT BEEN REBUTTED, THEREFORE I WIN EVERY SINGLE ARGUMENT SO FAR! !! Also, to help you out with voting, my opponent has FAILED to even prove his half of the argument, he has NOT PROVEN THAT FATHER CHRISTMAS IS REAL AND ALIVE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM! ! !