The Cosmic Hierarchy: "U"niverse/"G"od

Ok let’s take a step back here. Ebuc when someone, anyone, makes a statement the burden of proof is on them. For examples if I say unicorns rule the cosmos I have two prove that both unicorns exist and that they rule. You state “I do not prove anything” therefore you have failed the burden of proof for your claim, and lost the debate. As addressing your hierarchy seems very important to you I’m going to address your fluff that you can’t prove exists. Spirit is listed number 1. (the top) Here you take a physical object “mind”, a measurement of the mind “intellect”, and “concepts” and present them as if they are one thing, a spirit. Now I’m going to assume you were trying to say consciousness rather than mind as mind deals with the physical realm. You are correct the abstract concepts are not 3 dimensional, or in the physical world they are part of the imagination. Which is a byproduct of consciousness, which is a byproduct of having a brain. Your task in this debate was to prove that the brain and the spirit are separate entities. You have not done that as previously stated. Metaphysical – non-occupied space was next. I really didn’t understand why you felt like unoccupied had higher rank than god or higher than consciousness (if you listed these backwards) but I assume this has something to do with how you romanticize the intangible. Metaphysical is all about abstract BS connections that can’t be proven. And to keep in line with that you say macro-micro-infinite non-occupied space rather than just saying voids. (which is what you would say if you aren’t trying to sound fluffy) Finite occupied space Universe/god is last. Here you use god and universe as synonyms again but never prove god exists. It’s also interesting that you list god as finite, that goes against pantheism, so I guess you have some custom version, but I digress. You break down the physical world into three categories and label all of them spirit: 3a spirit –fermions, bosons and any aggregate collection thereof is listed first. This is just fluffy way to say Atoms. Not using any definition of the word spirit like ever. 3b - spirit-3, metaphysical-3, ultra-micro gravity, that I believe is associated with positive geodesic shape ( ) of space, as found specifically in a torus is listed next. This is some BS random thoughts you are trying to piece together with no basis in reality. Microgravity is just free fall in gravity that gives the illusion of no gravity. Ultra Microgravity is just fluff. Which you believe is associated with geodesic shapes. (think 100 side dice) But you believe those shapes to be positively charged found in donuts. I guess because geodesic didn’t sound cool enough by itself so you electrically charged it and made it an innertube. It’s not possible to be both geodesic and torus shaped, I think you got confused and forgot you said geodesic SHAPES, and a torus is not a geodesic shape. One is a smooth arc while the other is flat pieces that together create an arc. So invalid BS fluff again, and has nothing to do with the word spirit. 3C spirit-4, metaphysical-4, ultra-micro dark energy, that, I believe is associated with negative, geodesic shape )( of space as found in torus is listed last. Ok then we are back to the contradiction of geodesic and torus shaped. Why doesn’t sphere get some face time? There are other shapes out there than donut shaped! But let’s dissect your last bit of fluff. Ok we are to dark matter, but I guess that wasn’t cool enough by itself so you added ulta-micro. So, small dark energy is … spirit? Um no. And nothing to do with the word spirit. Dark energy is not synonymous with spirit even if it’s donut shaped. (you know because we all know dark energy only exists… in donut shape) Now later own you quoted three of the definitions from merriam-webster on spirit as well, but you didn’t provide a link. Here is that link for reference. https://www.merriam-webster.com... 3: temper or disposition of mind or outlook especially when vigorous or animated in high spirits Response – This is not an entity this is synonym for energy. For example, In high spirits and in high energy. (although that isn’t a common phrase) 7: a lively or brisk quality in a person or a person's actions Response - This is not an entity this is synonym for energy. 12: an alcoholic solution of a volatile substance spirit of camphor Response - This is not an entity this is alcoholic. (I can only assume you posted this by mistake) Look I know this stuff works great at taking money from stupid people. I’ve watch David Wolfe make billions peddling this type of crap, but don’t get on here and actually try to debate it’s merit like it’s not BS mysticism. Your religion is no better, and has no better proof than any of the other 3,000 or so that exist. You have faith in it, but it has ZERO to do with being rational, using logic, or having common sense. It requires you not be rational, not use logic, and not have common sense while you give a con man all your money.