There are Multi Universes

for your views and arguments. "They do lead up somewhere, as we know, all that "swallowed up matter" has been sent somewhere. It cannot be kept in the small compact area with an extreme high density or it will be like a supernova explosion(though that's how the black holes mostly form) SO there has to be a deposit ground of this material. " Is the concept of Black Holes clear here? (a) Black holes are not literal holes in Space. Black holes are actually dense round structures which have very, very high desity. As, Sir isaac Newton introduce and Albert Einstein and Sir Hubble proved that gravity increases with mass, This black holes contain such high desity and mass that they have a very strong gravitational force. This force is so high that even light cannot escape from its clutches. So, how come this black hole can transport things to some other place? Pro says that matter gets attracted to a black hole and stays there. .. This statement is vague. The Structure of a Black hole is divide into three parts. .. The outer event horizon,inner event horizon and singularity. think about Earth. .. Do the satellites around earth revolve around it or fall onto earth again? In a black hole, what happens is, once a heavenly body(suppose the sun) gets into the outer event horizon, It starts revolving around it instead of falling into it. Now, suppose(as pro may suggest) a star by some chance fell into the inner event horizon, it will get crunched and join the singularity and the black hole will get a little larger. How large? Not too much. See, a black hole is so crunched up in the singularity that it is no larger than your thumb! A star if by chance falls into the black hole, then it too will be crunched. This shows that it is a vague thought that black holes "swallow up matter" and need to deposit them in some other place. (a). http://www.kidsastronomy.com... " Also if you do not mind I would like to include Hindu Mythology. You see the Vedas has specified that there are different Lokas in this huge universe called an ocean where Vishnu Rests. A bit more into Hindu Mythology, The Universe is said to have had been a bindu(a small spot in Sanskrit). "Hindu Mythology says that there are many Lokas in this universe and this religious books are never reliable sources! Maybe they refer something like aeroplanes but don't they refer to many other impossible things? It might be that stories of the Mahabharata or the Ramayana are true but they are filled with such exaggeretion that they never were,are and will be reliable sources. The Universe is said to have had been a bindu(a small spot in Sanskrit)? Please site the sources because all I know about this concept is that this is a philosophy of a south Indian philosopher which says that the Bindu is God(who is formless) and is the all knowing and our souls go to him and stay in peace. .. (b)(b) . http://www.speakingtree.in... "Have you ever thought about an exactly virtually parallel universe as you see our universe is made up of matter and there has been a discovery of anti-matter. So it is theoretically possible for an exact opposite universe of ours to exist. "And how does the discovery of Anti-Matter show that multi universes are out there? Is the concept of Anti-matter clear here? (c) Anti-matter is made up of anti-sub atomic particles. Our terms make it sound as if they are things from "out of this universe" but these are things that have always been their but not found. Think about it, When the planet pluto was discovered, People thought that it was something "out of the universe" but is it? no. It is just that Pluto was found later. This things such as dark matter, higgs boson,anti-matter are also things in this universe that have always been there but just found recently. (c) . http://en.wikipedia.org... "So why cannot there be many universes just because we do not have the technology to find this out. This is my possible thesis for how is there is a possibility of multi universes. "The possibility of multi-universe is a hypo-thesis and always will be. If thousands of big bangs are actually occuring in the infinite void called space. .. is it not obvious that one of these explosions should occur very near our universe and collide with us? Is it not obvious that the raw energy should destroy us? ?? There is a low possibility of multi-universes. And of-course we have powerful radars. .. isn't it obvious that the sheer energy of a big bang around us fluctuate this universe and all those gamma and radio rays reach our radars and create a big affect on the papers of those graphs? Those graphs which show the amount of fluctuating radio waves have always stayed normal with rare fluctuations because of Solar storms and supernova explosions. .. If there would have been some other universe sforming out there, it would have been a theory with proof by now and not a thesis. My rebuttal and arguments prove that there is almost no possibility of multi-universes. .let alone parallel universes.