Resolved: The Bible does not teach that it alone is sufficient

Whatever be the reason of Pro’s forfeit in the last round, it is irrelevant. I’d encourage members to vote on basis of an honest judgment of the arguments in the cases presented here, and not just because of his concession. I am sure there is no way for the Catholics to disprove my case. The three contentions I defended here are supported by scripture and reasoning. a) Bible does teaches Sola Scripture ie. Scripture alone to be all sufficientb) Catholics faces the fatal counter tradition of Rabbinic Judaism who holds the very same contention. c) Epistemological defeat in presupposing a council to be authority1). The Bible does teach Sola Scripture, from the time of Moses to the NT. 1 Kings 2:3-4 "Keep the charge of the LORD your God, to walk in His ways, to keep His statutes, His commandments, His ordinances, and His testimonies, according to what is WRITTEN in the Law of Moses, that you may succeed in ALL that you do and wherever you turn, so that the LORD may carry out His promise which He spoke concerning me”2 Timothy 3:16-17 "All Scripture is God-breathed, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for instruction, for training in righteousness, in order that the man of God might be complete, fully equipped for every good work."The Bible gives extensive warning for believers not to believe in manmade doctrines, philosophy, or any other Gospel that the Apostles preached For instance Galatians 1:6-9.Colossians 2:8 Be careful not to allow anyone to captivate you through an empty, deceitful philosophy that is according to human traditions and the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. (NET) The true tradition of Church is very clear- the Gospel which Apostles preached and taught the believers who they wrote, as they mentioned it to be the real tradition. Catholics have to equate this true tradition with the mysterious hidden extra biblical doctrines of catholic tradition. This is argument from silence again. Their doctrines come under the false tradition of man that the Apostles warned of. So that’s negative evidence against the tradition of man, we are to stick only to the Scripture. Even if there were no such explicit verse like 2 Tim 3 presented in the Bible, that would no reason that we should assume that there are some hidden extra biblical doctrines we are to adhere to. That’s just false arguments from silence. There were never any extra biblical doctrines. For some studies and detailed arguments, evidences, please see the footnotes of NET Bible on 2 Peter 1:20, which was another supposedly good argument of Catholics. The verse actually says that no prophesy or scripture is written by the personal invention of prophet, but divinely revealed and inspired. Read the footnote here http://bible.org... Another source I found beneficial is the work of Gassen, a Jewish brother who refuted Rabbi Tovia Singer’s argument against Sola Scripture https://sites.google.com... You can also read the Sola Scripture debate transcript “James White vs Patrick Madrid” on Aomin dot org. 2) The arguments of unbelieving Judaizers fall on the head of the Catholics as all of their arguments against Sola Scripture are identical to the catholic arguments. This is a huge problem which makes their position untenable and paradoxical. 3) The epistemological argument was supposed to be the best defense for their position but it’s clearly shown to be fallacious. It assumes that we can’t safely believe in the infallible scriptures and the canon without believing some external infallible source. It’s proven that their case is just made up of false assumptions, reasoning, doctrines and some misinterpretations. I challenge any other catholic apologists, if you think you have a good defense for your case against Sola Scripture, and that you can refute my contentions, debate me. Or contact your eminent scholars and apologists to help you. Thank you for reading. Titus 1:9 holding fast the faithful word which is in accordance with the teaching, so that he will be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict.