Capitalism is Superior to Communism

I will literally take the text out of my Roman army encyclopedia on why they fell. Not their economic structure. Since you can't take my word. "The Uniforms of the Roman World." The Crisis of The Third Century. The 3rd century was a drak time for the Roman Empire. Emperors were assassinated in a string of attacks from within, and every emperor that assumed the throne must have felt how shaky the crown was on his head. During this time, encroachments along the border increased, and a state of anarchy became the norm in Rome. (Skipping to another part because it was talking about same thing) The Collapse of the Western Empire (402-76AD) (moving around at +++, since you don't want to hear all of it.) The western Roman Empire collapsed under the repeated blows from barbarian tribes and armies that were migrating from the east. Successive groups of Germanic peoples, searching both for land on which to live, and to escape nomadic tribes pushing them westwards, +++ At this point the Roman Army was no longer the strong, well-trained and disciplined infantry legions of the height of the empire. Legions were still in existence, but they were only about 1,000 strong, whereas the old legions had been of 5,000 well-armed and equipped infantry. Old habits were sometimes there, as well as titles and ranks, but the traditional Roman infantry army no longer existed. . . (Shall I add more History King? I am the history buff here.) But really the Eastern Rome lasted another like 1,000 years? You basically stating after WW1, Britain was on top and didn't suffer economically (that much) makes me so angry! Yes they were still on top of the empires but OMG! They went worse than bankrupt! But I' am only going to post the opening; if you want me to add more. Ask me. Like add facts. Not an opening. "This was a war that bankrupted the victors and utterly destroyed the economies of the vanquished; pain augmented by a punitive peace. It was a conflict that disrupted the slowly evolving democratic systems and ushered in the age of the dictator, unleashing forces that could not be controlled by a politician." Though I do agree that Germany suffered way more. You state that a communist state has not proven to establish a good economy. But look at Russia. They have hundreds of Nukes, one of the top largest countries (other than land mass), invasion of Europe and picking a fight of one of the top Republics. I don't see on how invading Ukraine is saving Russia's economy when all of America is ready to go to war. Sorry for misspell of 'economic'. When I mentioned the social structures of bees and termites I was mentioning how Communism could work if everyone was selfless and helped eachother. Like how 'Communism=Community' and how it was made for the 'community' to help eachother to make ends meat. Though I know it will never happen because: sin and selfishness. That is my ideaology. The main problem of communism is that 1% of the population or the government has all the money. But really, look at our economy: do we all have shacks? Or all have mansions? Really with any government, economy, people ideaology; they always create the same outcome: debt, no equal amount of spreaded wealth, and slow improvement; if any.