Batman's Moral Code makes him just as harmful as the villains he pursues.

First off, I am going to define some words that have been used thus far:1: Harm - Physical or Psychological injury or damage.2:Villain - A wicked or evil person - Used here to describe unique, and recurring characters such as the Joker, Penguin, Riddler, etc.Secondly, I will prove the validity of my first statement, "By disallowing himself to kill, Batman is actually harming Gotham city by allowing Villains to live and/or escape."Gotham city and it's occupants have been attacked multiple times by the Villain known as the Joker. It is known that Batman has been more than capable of ending the Joker's life multiple times, saving the citizens of Gotham from possible attacks in the future, and yet, he refuses to do so. Also, Batman has been directly responsible for certain actions of another Villain; The Red HoodJason Todd, formerly known as Robin, became the Red Hood after he was murdered by the Joker, and reappeared later on as the Red Hood. He goes about killing people in the name of Justice and eventually kidnaps the Joker and lures Batman to meet him. He then reveals himself, and asks Batman why he wouldn't seek revenge for Jason's death. Batman says, he was tempted to torture the Joker to death, but refused to go down that road. After a standoff, in which Jason Todd asked batman to kill the Joker and end his reign of murder, Batman refuses, and stuns Jason. The joker then escapes, and so does the Red Hood.By refusing to kill the Joker, who escapes yet again, Batman also creates the vengeful Jason Todd. Thus two devious and dangerous killers now roam Gotham's Streets, instead of none. Batman does not simply "do nothing"; He is actually letting these people continue to hurt Gotham city and it's Inhabitants. Batman is simply a self-righteous villain, no better than the people he seeks to stop, for the sole reason that he never actually stops them. It may be the Local governments fault that violent prisoners are escaping, but after 10+ years of this catch and release lifestyle, he should know by now that the only way to protect Gotham and the rest of the world is simply by terminating those who have shown that they are truly evil. Allowing this cycle to continue is worse than actually killing them.Many Heroes have killed in order to save the lives of others. Captain America and Superman, have both demonstrated that taking a life to save lives does not make you evil. Simply put, Batman has a very skewed and illogical moral compass, which seems to make Gotham city and it's citizens suffer. Killing is not wrong, per say, but Murder is. Batman seems to think they are one and the same, and treats them as such.Also, Batman may have saved Gotham from quite a few different People, but most, if not all of them, were previously confronted by Batman and he let them walk. Saving a City because you allowed a maniac to try and blow it up is more covering up your mistake than actually doing good.If it was you who was being terrorized by these Villains, and you witnessed their frequency of escape, would you blame them? Or instead put the blame where it belongs; On the Man who gives them the cause to escape? If you were the Joker, would you not use that to your advantage? It is an invitation for bad people to be openly evil without great risk.