Global Warming is Good

I will be arguing that Global warming cannot be good or bad, because it is merely fake. Global warming is a hoax. 1. Sunspot activity is in a cycle in which it reduces warming radiation from the sun. Have you looked at your own outside thermometer? Record lows and snow storms abound. Global warming is simply a natural part of nature that has occurred many times over the millions of years that the earth has been around. The earth has experienced similar sunspot cycles throughout history, and yet remains abroad. . http://kutwrite.hubpages.com... Global warming, in a sense, has happened many times before. "The basic explanation for global warming is an overall, and relatively dramatic, increase of the earthï¿½€™s temperature caused by several factors. The main argument is that the earthï¿½€™s ozone layer is getting chipped off little by little by the countless chemicals that humans spout off, ranging from hairsprays to emissions by automobiles and all the other pollution-causing substances that environmentalists rage against. The decreasing number of trees also contributes to the process, putting humans on an endless, and seemingly losing fight, against keeping the planet from overheating. " . http://globalwarming-articles.org... The earth naturally goes through cycles of heating and cooling. This is an illusion brought up by people to scare others out of their wallets. My question is, if the earth has experienced this many times before, why would we be in any more danger now, then we were then? The earth has survived through countless years and millennia, and any suspicion of global warming is easily explained by natural cycles. Around the year 4500 BC, archaeologists have dug up proof for a very real, very big flood a few thousand years ago. What did they find? Countless fossils of fish and other marine creatures stuck up on the mountains in the Middle East region. Speculation to this was caused greatly to believe that the polar Ice caps melting were the cause. So in that case, thousands of years ago, we polluted the atmosphere to recieve these effects? Unlikely. Again, this is purely a natural cause. 2. Why is it that the big scares always mean big profits for companies connected to governments? ((Howard C. Hayden, emeritus professor of physics from the University of Connecticut, told a Pueblo West audience that he was prompted to speak out after a visit to New York where he learned that scaremongering billboards about the long-term effects of global warming were being purchased at a cost of $700,000 a month. "Someone is willing to spend a huge amount of money to scare us about global warming," Hayden said. "Big money is behind the global-warming propaganda. ")) . http://www.prisonplanet.com... Companies promoting global warming spend and receive large sums of money advertising the global warming myth ever day. People will spend and donate money to prevent this "mythical disaster" from occurring, but what are they really achieving with this money? How does Al Gore plan to stop the "inevibility" Of Global warming, as humans continue to use man made products into the world? I have a riddle that solves global warming quite inexplicably. The earth weights approximately 13,170,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pounds. . http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu... If man builds a wall the weighs 6,000,000 pounds, how much would the earth then weigh? The fool will answer: 13,170,000,000,000,000,006,000,000. But the correct answer is: 13,170,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. If were using our own earth materials we aren't in fact changing it's weight. Same applies with global warming. If we are using our own materials and just re supplying them back into nature, how are we in fact causing global warming? Now I will move on to my opponents arguments. Mostly he just copied and pasted things from other sites, But I am assuming he means the same things that they do. My opponents first source says that warming is intensified by droughts and heat waves. Also in the same source, it talks about how gasoline and fossil fuels are the major cause for unnatural heat waves. I dis-agree that this in anyway proves his point. His point being that the heat waves are unnatural. We are nature, thus nature is unperturbed by us. We again are only giving nature back what it gave to us, and our climate will remain un-affected. "there is one major existential threat, which demands urgent action. It is the threat of global warming to the stability of the blimate upon which all earthly life depends. It is virtually impossible to find evidence of disagreement over the fundamentals of global warming. " The fundamentals of global warming, are simply natures course of action. I have proved that man kind will sustain life as global warming essentially happened over 6000 years. Global warming, is not harmful to the extent of the extortion of man kind. I conclude: Global warming is simply a natural process of sun spot cycle that has proved itself through history. "History repeats itself". We have no cause to believe that global warming is harmful, nor that it is caused my man rather than nature.