Maggie's a better debater than Trent

Well Maggie certainly had made some great points in here last argument. She did a great job of using copy and paste to take the arguments from the list of comments that have formed around this debate. I on the other hand, am goning to form my case myself. So maggie in her last argument stated 4 things. 1.) Making things up proves nothing since i use her case 2.) She has been in longer and gotten higher scores then myself 3.) She has confidence as well as myself 4.) Me being eye candy proves i don't create logical arguments These are the facts of the case. Maggie and myself have went to 2 debate tournaments together. We have won a total of 4 out of 8 debates as a team in public forum. She has gone to 2 additional debate tournaments with ANOTHER partner. She lost most of those debates winning a total of 2 debates i beleive (Maggie can clear that up), but i do know she did not win as many debates as she did with me. She does have a higher rank then myself due to having more time in debate. I will now break down each of these arguments and rebuild my own. Maggie stated that me making up cases proves nothing about me being better due to the fact that i use her case. This statement was completely and utterly untrue. I made a rough case both times that ended up not working. I then used the research i had obtained and facts from the opponents case to form a good argument. We then won 2 out of 4 debates that tournament. She did not make a case, i made one up for us to use as a team, resulting in 2 victories. Her second point was that she has more time in debate and has much more experince then myslef, as well as getting higher scores. I can not oppose her time argument, she has been in longer, and as the score sheets show, she has gotten better scores. These scores say nothing of our debate skills however. She put much more effort into the research and preparation of the debate then myself. I heard the topics for both tournaments the day of. With mroe time to prepare, it is logical that she scores higher, but does not prove that she is a better debater, simply a better time manager. I would also like to point out that in class i have debated by myself twice. Both times i won and still, did not plan prior to the debate. I can win without her, and without planning. Her third argument was that we are equal in terms of confidence. While she does have confidence and did have the guts to challenge me, she does not show the confidence i do in a debate. Judges have proven me right on many score sheets when they leave a comment on my confidence, and not maggie's. Her final argument was that me being eye candy has nothing to do with debate. I would totally agree that this is irrelevant and was simply a joke for the enjoyment and entertainment of you kind spectators. So lets review what we have learned 1.) I do make my arguments up on the spot with little to no preperation and still, we win the debate. I have done this while debating solo as well. 2.) Her higher scores prove nothing because she had more time to prepare then myself. 3.) She has confidence but not as much as myself, the judges comments are my proof. 4.) THe eye candy comment was irrelevant and was made simply for the enjoyment of you kind spectators I hope that this debate goes well and due to the facts and arguments i have presented to you, it would be of little intelligence to vote for my kind opponent, Maggie. Thank you for your time.