Bryan Mullins: The Roast Game Is Fact!

To conclude this debate, here are my final rebuttals. 1. "so let me get this straight, they get rid of their evidence? then how do you know if the theory is real or not? if their is no evidence, then you don't know if the children are actually eaten am I right? their is one point where your entire argument falls apart, how would they get rid of all the evidence, when the government could realize the children are missing, and mark them such as? You are acting hypocritical by stating I need new arguments, your entire debates have been rebutting mine, why don't you practice what you preach and give me some new info? " First off, it's "there" not "their. " Second, you're wrong, again. That is the worst new argument I have ever heard, because first off, it makes no sense, secondly, how would the Government know, what does it have to do with the Government? Nothing. They get rid of the evidence by throwing it all away in the garbage, then it gets taken to the dump truck, then the trash bag gets crushed, and the rest is history. That is not the point where my argument falls apart, it's where you misrepresent all my arguments, only to prove nothing wrong. The burden of proof argument is officially dead. 2. "by spelling your name, it is not looking up the "roasting game" it is looking up YOU, and your wikia, and everything else you made, because by confessing that your name is needed to show the evidence, it is now prove that, every video, every site, supporting this is just stuff made by him, making it false evidence, in order to get some legit evidence, get an outside source. that you DIDNT make. like that youtube video, from a channel that has your name" Again, you misrepresented the google link, you keep on misrepresenting any link I cite (only to ignore it). You should've looked at the link, you'll go through a lot of stuff with the search terms "the roast game bryan mullins" not "roasting game. " You are misleading because you mistook my link and ignored everything I provided as a source. Also, punctuation error, "DIDNT," you had no apostrophe, you already lost S+G points with the sentence with no period, now it's a word without the apostrophe. 3. "how are my questions pointless, I'm asking how can you explain a theory that has no evidence, that question pretty much has a point if you ask me. and how in the world is proof arguments pointless? it is one of the most basic factors in debates. " Another punctuation error, question mark is missing after the word "pointless. " Also, I'm saying your arguments are pointless because I've already debunked them. Why are you complaining that your questions have been debunked? You shouldn't be. 4. "you literally say in the wikia "if they say no, they are guilty" in the second paragraph. " Again, another punctuation error, the quotation mark is not needed at the beginning of this sentence. Conclusion: The Roast Game is the proven fact that families literally ate their own children, the burden of proof argument has been debunked. Con keeps repeating himself, and bringing back the burden of proof argument relentlessly, though all his arguments have been debunked before. Con keeps making punctuation errors and keeps failing at making a real and legit argument. Con misrepresented pretty much everything I argued, whether it was what I said at the beginning of the debate, or he just outright claimed that I lost conduct points when I'm only correcting him. Sources: [1] . http://bryan-mullins-the-roast-game.wikia.com... [2] . http://www.debate.org... [3] . http://www.google.com...