Creationism VS Evolution

I will argue for creationism. But in the way that I believe it to be. I also acknowledge that microevolution , or adaptive mutations are possible over time. However, there is little evidence to substantiate macro evolution. An external force seems to have been required to bring out the gradual onset of man through the course of evolution. Adaptive mutation ALONE, simply could not have directed the course all life, nature, matter and physics. Also, it would require a massive assumption to believe macro evolution created the diverse range of species it did, all simply by means of natural selection. We already know such ideas to be highly implausible. This is why there are many competing theories in evolutionary biology. Because we know the darwinian model of "evolution" or "natural selection" simply does not fit the bill in explaining human's morality or our language. Neither does it entirely account for changes between species and how natural selection cannot effect DNA or genetic adaptations to the point of speciation. The darwinian tree of evolutions is eerily similar to the chronology of God creating the fish in the seas, fowls in the air, then those that walk on fours and finally man. (Book of Jubillees gives an even more similar account than the Bible.) From the book of Jubillees And God appointed the sun to be a great sign on the earth for days and for sabbaths and for months and for feasts and for years and for sabbaths of years and for jubilees and for all seasons of the years. And it divideth the light from the darkness [and] for prosperity, that all things may prosper which shoot and grow on the earth. These three kinds He made on the fourth day. And on the fifth day He created great sea monsters in the depths of the waters, for these were the first things of flesh that were created by his hands, the fish and everything that moves in the waters, and everything that flies, the birds and all their kind. And the sun rose above them to prosper (them), and above everything that was on the earth, everything that shoots out of the earth, and all fruit-bearing trees, and all flesh. These three kinds He created on the fifth day. And on the sixth day He created all the animals of the earth, and all cattle, and everything that moves on the earth. And after all this He created man, a man and a woman created He them, and gave him dominion over all that is upon the earth, and in the seas, and over everything that flies, and over beasts and over cattle, and over everything that moves on the earth, and over the whole earth, and over all this He gave him dominion. And these four kinds He created on the sixth day. And there were altogether two and twenty kinds. Also, the theory of evolution does not account for many of the most critical "steps" within evolution itself! It has no explanation for abiogensis - creation of life from non life. It has no explanation for speciation - creation of new species It has no explanation for language - the unique ability to speak It has no explanation for morality - the ability to feel empathy So. The theory of evolution, although a good guess, is at best an entirely incomplete answer and every scientist knows this. It simply has not answered all the questions about how life began. In the absence of an alternative the most rational explanation is creationism. Namely, that there was an external force that helped or guided evolution towards the eventual path of creating humanoid beings endowed with qualities of a god. That is- the ability to understand all things. (Given the knowledge is given). This God like qualiry of humans, often leads many humans to think they are in fact God, or that they do in fact, "know all things". Although little would admit to it outright, any atheist / pseudo scientist you speak to, will immedaitely begin acting like they know certain truths about the universe they simply do not know.