Single sex education system is better than a co-ed system.

In fact, I don't have many time because of school and some issues at home. But hopefully I have found time to answer. It takes me much longer to write it because I have problems to express right. For the problem of not providing my arguments, I stated at the beginning that "3. Con refute" but I'll follow decorum and I'll provide my own arguments. I'll begin with negotiating your arguments. Contention 1: My opponent knew that if I his arguments I would win thus He tries to refute all my arguments.1. ) Pro claims that students are still being distracted in early coed systems. But He admit that the level of distraction is not based on being in class with opposite-sex. I admit that in early education there is still minor distraction BUT not caused by being in class with opposite-sex. Hence his argument is invalid because this doesn't make single-sex education system better than Co-ed.2. )In this case my opponent resolves my argument bad way. Just to repeat it: I brought up this quote: "There are many students, who maintain their social connections and still are able to concentrate in a coed school, it really just depends on the individual child"[1]. However, my opponent deny this argument by this: "my stance was not that every single student is distracted by the opposite sex" which, as we can read in round 1, he didn't said. So his argument for this issue is invalid. The rest of his argument he stated that entire school day revolves around trying to impress women. I don't want to deny this statement because there is no way to disprove it but this action they conduct freely, no one push them to impress women. Therefore there is possibility to study instead of impress women. It depends only on each man whether he wants to impress woman or not. Hence there is option to either study or seeking for new life-partner. In addition, according to studies [2] girls are much intelligent than boys at school. This exactly can engage boys to study more to catch women up in grades.3. )Pro associate study at school with life beyond it. I can't deny that students who study at single-sex schools don't meet opposite-sex everyday. They talk to their mother/father via skype, they talk to salesperson etc. In fact this isn't interacting professionally as students require. They also lack in ability to understand each other which enhance negative future interactions among them[3]. and I doubt they spend all-days interacting with opposite-sex instead of studying. This attack fails. Contention 2:This entire Contention claimed by Pro appears to me as bad based on my arguments and I think He didn't grasp my argumentation right.1. ) I'll begin with quote of my own: "these schools tend to be more academically rigorous, and the students who attend them are strong learners already. " You claim you We already affirm that "the education is more rigorous and students perform better". Since you already presented proofs that students in single-sex schools perform better I had to refute your argument which I did. You chose passages from my argument and join them without any logical meaning. I'll repeat myself again and please read it thoroughly. Round 2 Con: "students who attend them(Single-sex schools) are strong learners already[4]". This means that students who attend these schools study good already. If they would attend Co-ed school they would study good here as well. So your argument that Single-sex schools are much better is INVALID. An the end of my claim: "The students choose those school just for reason that single-sex schools are more serious, difficult, and wealthier. Thus they tuition is much bigger. But this schools don't give a student an experience in field of working with opposite-sex. This only co-ed schools can provide. "2. )This is completely ridiculous statement which I disproved in prior argument. I urge Pro to read thoroughly.3. )Relates to Contention 1 point 2Contention 3:1. ) This issue isn't problem in country where I live. But I agree with point that boys are misunderstood. I didn't grasp why this issue is strictly Co-ed problem. Boys are drop out because they don't meet the requirements. Imagine 2 schools one is Co-ed and the other Single sex, they have same study plan and have same teachers(only female). I don't think that the system will make males misunderstood. The point is that if we use same teachers it will have the same effect on boys. It depend only on teachers. Thus Pro's argument is invalid.2. ) This claim is connected with upper claim of this contention and prove it. But I have some doubts here. For instance, Why should teachers obtain training how to treat boys only on Single sex schools and not on Co-ed? This discrepancy force me to think of veracity of Pro's claim. I urge Pro to bring evidence of this that is claim is true.3. )In this case pro didn't read my argument thoroughly. He claimed that females study better but I responded that boys are better in math for instance. Therefore Pro attack me rather than argument with me. Arguments:Because I have only 2,500 characters remaining I have to present my arguments shortly. I speak in favour of Co-ed school system. Contention 1:I'll start off my first argument with quotation of the probably best philosopher ever, Plato said that "Co-ed creates a feeling of comradeship. " And this is all about. Being, studying, interacting with as many people possible is the best opportunity to gain feeling of comradeship, sense of working in teams etc. Moreover, studying, working with opposite-sex when hormones are raging brings students will create a sense of healthy competition among them. They will work as hard as possible just for the reason of being better than one from opposite-sex. Contention 2:In terms of finance, Co-ed is much better. Students don't need to be separated thus there are no money needed to pay extra teachers and separate schools. It helps to make easier nowadays economical crisis. [6]Contention 3:There were ideas that boys are gross in presence of girls. In fact, they are not at all. [6] They behave more decent, polite. Just image that you are in classroom and your favourite girl would come. I guess most of boys would stop doing such a impolite things and mellowed down just for the reason to impress her. In single-sex school there is more chance of being bullied. [7] Why? Mainly because of the lack of sex-counterparts. The link[7] describes about women being bullied. Women don't bully each other because being in classroom with men add them another problematic factor. Contention 4:The most important factor which I mentioned earlier, besides competition among opposite-sex, finance, polite behavior, is that they learn how to work together in further life. This is exactly the key why to choose Co-ed school. Boys and girls remove their shyness and work easily in further life. This is the most important point why people from single-sex schools have big problems to work with their counter-partners. As Plato said "co-education creates comradeship". Conclusion:In the articles above I have disproved my opponent claims. I have added to his pleasure my arguments. My arguments stands on cooperation boys with girls which is by the way the most important and ancient cooperation ever. I don't want to persuade anyone to vote me. Vote the best one[1]. http://www.newyorkschools.com...[2]http://www.fastcodesign.com... [3]. http://www.ehow.com... [4]. http://io9.com... [5]. http://www.cathedral-school.co.uk... [6]. http://www.indiastudychannel.com... [7]. http://www.tes.co.uk... . http://slovnik.seznam.cz...=