Theoretically, It is possible to Divide by Zero

Thank you Con.Theoretical: Adj.1: confined to theory or speculation often in contrast to practical applications2: existing only in theory(1)3: of, pertaining to, or consisting in theory; not practical(2)4: Of, relating to, or based on theory.5: Restricted to theory; not practical(3)1) http://tinyurl.com...;merriam-webster2) http://tinyurl.com...;dictionary.reference3) http://tinyurl.com...;thefreedictionaryThe Resolution is that it's Theoretically possible... In Principle, not in actual Practice.I need to prove that in theory this would work, not that it actually works.1. Dividing x÷0 = y would mean x*y = 0 which is impossible when given actual values.(x / 2 = y)10 / 2 = 5But...(x * y = 2?)10 * 5 = 503. When Graphing f(x)=1/x, there is no specific value for when x=0, it approaches either -∞ or +∞.Graphing is only the application of a function (see definition 1).4. Division is repeated subtraction, and it doesn't work with division of zero."Now here comes the error:15÷0 = 0+0+0+0+0..................This is impossible to complete because no matter how many 0's you add, you will never reach 1..."You have proven my entire point, completely.15 / 0 = 0+0+0+0+0.... infinitely. Therefore the answer is infinity... It never ends.You would keep on adding. 15÷5 = 5+5+5You add 5 three times, therefore the answer is 3.15÷3= 3+3+3+3+3You add 3 five times, therefore the answer is 5.15÷0 = 0+0+0+0+0....You add zero infinitely, therefore the answer is infinity.Since you would keep adding zero forever, you will never reach the end, therefore you can conclude the answer is an infinity.Thanks for proving my thesis :)5. If dividing by 0, you would algebraically be able to prove that 1=2, 2=3, 4=5 and so on. This fallacy is irrelevant to whether or not you can theoretically divide by zero. It only proves that 1 does not equal 2. The concept of 1 equaling 2 has nothing to do with this.It only shows that dividing by zero does not let 1 = 2 or 2 = 3.Your idea is logical but it is flawed and that is why mathematicians all agree that any number divided by 0 is still undefined.If it is logical, than it'd work only in theory... Therefore making it theoretical.2: existing only in theory(1)3: of, pertaining to, or consisting in theory; not practical(2)5: Restricted to theory; not practical(3)Although your 4th example only further prove my logic by saying that you would add zero an infinite time, therefore the answer is infinity, as my theory claims.You said that "Zero is can't be reached, because unlike the other Whole Numbers, it's amount is infinitely small."No, this only proves my theory.Since Zero is infinitely small, the Quotient will be infinitely large. You're fallaciously misrepresenting the logic.The smaller the Divisor, the larger the Quotient. If Zero (divisor) is infinitely small, the Quotient is infinitely large (infinity.) Not 'close' to infinitely large, but actually infinitely large. ∞ and since ∞ is not a number, it is an idea, there is no value for it which is why we say it's undefined.Zero is also, technically, only an idea. But Zero and Infinity is a number... listen.Infinity is the concept of a never ending number. Since dividing by zero, as you have said (argument 4) leaves us adding a never ending amount of zeros, the answer is literally infinity.=======================With your 4th Argument, and final argument, you've only further proven my point.Zero is infinitely (not near infinitely, but actually infinitely) small. Infinite is infinitely (not near infinitely, but actually infinitely) large. The smaller the Divisor, the large the Quotient. If the Divisor is infinitely small (zero) than the Quotient is infinitely large (infinity).Infinity is the concept of a never ending number...The Con himself has admitted that dividing by Zero would leave us adding Zero continuously, never ending...If the Quotient is the number of times you can add the Divisor into the Dividend, and (as he actually said) you would be adding Zero into the Dividend an infinite times, the Quotient is Infinity.100 / 25 = 25 + 25 + 25 + 25 (4 times)The Quotient is 4.100 / 10 = 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 (10 times)The Quotient is 10.100 / 50 = 50 + 50 (2 times)The Quotient is 2.100 / 0 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0...... (infinite times)The Quotient is Infinity.You, yourself, have admitted this when you said..."...no matter how many 0's you add, you will never reach 15" So you will continuously add forever (infinitely,) and based on you 'special way to do division,' this means the answer is Infinity, as my theory said.As the Resolution goes, the concept of Dividing by Zero is only theoretical. While it doesn't follow every principle (the principle of reverse math) it does follow nearly every principle of basic division.1: confined to theory or speculation often in contrast to practical applicationsThe Con never rebutted my R2 arguments, so they still stand. I have proven, that while not practical, it works in theory.