Macro-evolution is a Myth

Rebuttal:"Even though a transposon is able to move or copy itself from one chromosome to another and polyploidy duplicates its genes , both still do not show speciation above the species level (i. e. Genus) but rather, both affirm micro-evolution. "I already showed an explanation of how speciation works. Speciation is basically macro evolutionI showed that it's logical and it's inevitable. The only things you need to understand evolution is micro evolution (which Pro already accepts) and speciation (that I already explained). Mutations are changes in the genome, those are the changes that affect the DNA, that add new genes. You could say that it's always the same number of genes but this is false, because duplication of genome is possible and it's actually common. This explains the process and how it works. It also shows that it's logical and inevitable. Then with evidence we can show that it already happened. "In fact, Charles Darwin's contribution to the scientific hypothesis of biological evolution is none other than micro-evolution. The proof of this is that he did not even know modern genetics. "It doesn't matter what Charles Darwin didn't know that we know now. The new discoveries just supported the theory. "It must be noted also that common structures does not automatically mean common ancestry because genes are inherited, not structures. "We already know that common ancestors are the inevitable result of speciation. The fossil record is more than just some bones that look alike. It is a record of fossils that are chronologically aligned. Pro is trying to separate the logic from the evidence, but the evidence just shows that the predictions made from the logic is true. The prediction is that because variation and competition, natural selection will "select" certain characteristics that will be preserved and reproduced. Just like what happen with words. And then we can see the evidence that it happened (in both cases) from the round 2 argument. "Hence, we, again, need to know how is information added into a pre-existing genome? "I already explained this 2 times. "This question entails another one, how do the first cells came into existence? "No it doesn't. I don't see the connection between genes and mutations with the origin of cells. And the origin of life, or the origin of cells are not part of the study field of the theory of evolution. Remember that scientific theories explain specific group of facts. If you want to know more about abiogenesis, and be updated with the discoveries I recommend you the work of Dr Jack W. Szostak. Read his research, it's really interesting. "Fossils does not show macro-evolution. In order for a fossil to reveal a macro-evolution kind of speciation, it needs to be seen as a transitional fossil"I already explained transitional fossils. I knew that was the argument of the first round and I already rebutted it. The question is fallacious. Every fossil is a transitional fossil. Every species is a transitional species and a finished one. This is what the theory of evolution predicts and this is what the fossil record shows. "Archaeopteryx cannot have been the forerunner of birds since birds were already in existence. "Remember that the proof of the fossil record is in all the fossils, a huge group of fossils, not one. And the argument of Pro is fallacious for the same reason the last question is fallacious. Pro needs to review the meaning of species or read my rebuttal of the first round where I explain it. "The problem with macro-evolution is that it isn't observable because humans live ephemerally. "This is irrelevant. This is another fallacy. There is a lot of things we can't see with our eyes. But evidence shows us what happened and help us to make predictions. " I do believe that biological evolution is inevitable. "My argument was about speciation being inevitable. Pro didn't rebut or even mention any of my arguments about speciation. End of the rebuttal:I used this round to rebut my opponent's "arguments". I'm not adding sources because sources of what I explain in this round were added in previous round. Thanks for the debate.