Christ Committed Suicide

Final RebuttalR4) CON is shifting the goalposts on omniscience and omnipotence. In Round #2, it was that "Jesus was not omniscient during his life on Earth". When PRO proffered evidence of such, in Round #3, CON then stated that "Jesus was not omniscient, in his own words."Well, here is Jesus, in His own words, proclaiming his omniscience - John 10:30:"I and the Father are one.”This definitively puts the matter to rest. CON may try to shift the goalposts again; please keep in mind that if she does, it's only because all of her other arguments on this matter have been refuted.R5) CON attempts an argument ad absurdum by stating that "almost anything could be called suicide. Lying around on a Sunday afternoon eating cake could be called suicide since we know that there's a link between lack of exercise and unhealthy diet and diseases such as cancer and heart disease."Most people who lounge around eating unhealthy food are not aware of their own mortality. Most people who experience their first heart attack or stroke immediately change their lifestyle habits once faced with this issue. There is no intention to kill oneself in such circumstances...there is no awareness that their actions are life-threatening.Contrast with Bobby Sands starving himself to death - he KNEW death was the outcome of his hunger strike, and he HAD THE POWER to just pick up some food and eat something. Contrast with Jesus, who, because he was omniscient and omnipotent, KNEW that the Romans would kill him, and HAD THE POWER to prevent such an occurrence. Bobby Sands and Jesus committed suicide...they achieved martyrdom for their respective causes. Their intentions were clear. People dying of a heart attack while eating Twinkies in their front porch are simply unaware of the dangers of their sedentary lifestyles. They had no intent whatsoever.R6) CON's most intriguing argument deals with predestination, how she thinks that "the prophecies states centuries earlier what was destined to occur" and that "he did not feel he had a choice". I would imagine the implicit argument is that God is powerless to change fate.This is silly. An omnipotent God is not bound by any fate or circumstance...they are all powerful and can change anything to their own desires. ConclusionPRO's argument is simple - suicide requires knowledge translating to intent, and power to carry out the intent. Bobby Sands, Jesus Christ, and CON's parent in her parent/daughter scenario, all had both intent and the power to carry out their intent - they committed suicide. Prisoners in Zimbabwe do not have the power to feed themselves - the food simply isn't there - they didn't commit suicide. People scarfing down Twinkies and the latest microwavable cheese snacks also do not have awareness of the potentially fatal consequences of their (in)action - if they die from a heart attack, they also aren't committing suicide. CON has tried to argue that Christ was neither omniscient nor omnipotent...there are several Bible verses that clearly state that Christ is God. It is hard to get any clearer than this.CON has also tried to argue that predestination precludes omnipotence...but predestination is what we as human beings are bound by...not God.Martyrs are suicidal. Bobby Sands was a martyr. The Cross is the quintessential symbol of martyrdom. Christ committed suicide.I thank Garbanza for entertaining this short, focused debate, as well as the readers for reading it and leaving an opinion of it. Please discuss your thoughts about this debate here, on this forum thread:http://www.debate.org...I remind readers that this is a no scoring debate. Thank you very much.