Capitalism is Immoral

Alex, it's been a pleasure!Well done fine Sir!Thank you for the debate, I enjoyed it!I was saving Round 5 to address the the Working Class directly - however - I don't think it would be fair as Pro would be unable to respond. Honestly, we simply ran out of time to give it a good once over - and I felt addressing the environment, amorality and utility were more important first, which leads to addressing the Working Class.Alex, I will touch on the Working Class just so we can say we did - however, voters can disregard.Pro' Closing Statement Concerns:Issue of the Morality of CapitalismThe argument often used for the morality of Capitalism is Utility! However, I don't think it prudent to clearly demonstrate Capitalism as amoral - in which the system itself (Capitalism) cannot be concerned with rightness or wrongness as it is a system used by people - but then use the argument of Utility to try and argue Capitalism as moral - that would be philosophically illogical as it would be a contradiction. In Round 4 Pro "baited" Con and invited "his reasoning for how Capitalism is infact moral." The motion of the debate is: Capitalism Is Immoral - NOT: Capitalism Is Moral. Con did not need to necessarily prove that Capitalism is moral. Rather, Con maintained and demonstrated the position that Capitalism (as an economic system) is amoral - thus not immoral.To which Pro concluded in his Closing Statement, "This is true, but Con fails to do so, he introduces data and fails to provide analysis." If it has been demonstrated that Capitalism itself as an economic system is amoral - then - the objective has been achieved as Capitalism is not automatically immoral.Issue of SourcesThis one is funny. Let's put this in perspective; Con uses at least 6 cites & sources in every cited round with a total 18. Pro only uses 3 or 4 in the same rounds with a total of 11 - A DIFFERENCE OF 7! - and then Pro asks the voting populace to only critic Con's cited sources.It's true, the quality of the source is important - BUT - if two cites were deducted from Con for each cited round, Con would still finish with more cites/sources of equal quality - still.Let's keep in mind cites are not just for source references when presenting a thesis but also to protect intellectual property and to prevent plagiarisms.Issue of Communist ArgumentsThere was no endorsement or argument made for/of Communism or Marxism whatsoever! Communism and Marxism was only mentioned for contrast of economic systems and to illustrate points regarding Capitalism and the environment! The contrast of economic systems was needed to show Pro that the reasons he gave for the immorality of Capitalism are also observed in "other" economies and, thusly, simply weren't good enough reasons for his case.Working Class (voters may disregard)Capitalism lifts general populations out of poverty. So, though we can talk about Class Warfare, child-labour in the past, and social-economic injustices, in general, the greater population is served (world wide), which was demonstrated through Utility.This is why data(s) for global Gross National Incomes (GNI) and the Human Development Index (HDI) were introduced by Con.Simply put, the individual worker is part of a system which benefits the whole.CONCLUSION:Like an inanimate object - Capitalism is not "conscious" of it's morality or not. Capitalism is an economic system - which is used by people - in which the system itself is incapable of being immoral or moral. Rather, it depends how it is used by the people using it. Hence, Capitalism as an economic system is AMORAL - and as such cannot be immoral.Con will not try to appeal or try to sway the voting populace in final remarks but simply requests that Debate.org's voting guidelines be followed.Many thanks!