The day of worship for Christians is Sunday

Off topic These are just some of the things PRO mentioned. I am happy to debate them on another time. Col 2:16-17 PRO has stated that the Sabbath was given to the Jews only. This is false in these verses: [Ex 20:10;Isa 56:6;Mark 2:27;Ecc 12:13;Gen 2:3]. PRO’s quote on col 2:16 is false. This is what the quote is: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath; Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body of Christ. – Colossians 2:16-17 In short, if you take out the examples given it reads: “Let no man therefore judge you … but the body of Christ.” If you read the whole chapter, you’ll find those with spoiled principalities and powers were judging the early Christians on how they eat, drink, keep holy days, new moons and the Sabbath. These judgements are a shadow of things to come. Again, Paul did not speak against the law. It’s either that, or you’re not allowed to tell someone it’s bad for eating food that is very unhealthy or telling a man he should stop drinking alcohol, thus making yourself a hypocrite in your own doctrine. Circumcision Circumcision is liken unto a wedding ring. Not wearing the ring doesn’t make you single again and wearing one doesn’t make you married… If you wear the wedding ring, it’s a token that you are married. In like manner, if you are circumcised, it is a token that you will keep the law. Therefore those who are young in the faith does not need to be circumcised. Kind of like, “I’m engaged”… For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law – Romans 2:25a Should vs Is If I say to my child, do not play in the high way. He then should not play in the high way. But if he is playing in the high way and says it is okay, does that make it okay? Likewise, if the day of worship is on Sunday, but should be on Saturday, does that make it okay? Contrary to what PRO accused me of, my first debate was to establish what truth, that which is right and wrong, is, so as to see that if the day of worship is (is it right) on Sunday. To PRO, the church says it is on Sunday and that their worship is on Sunday. However, just because the church is doing something doesn’t make it okay. To Yahuvah the day of worship is on the Sabbath day. And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the LORD. – Isaiah 66:23 In the quote I gave on the reformation’s losing against the council, the Arch Bishop clearly states that the day to observe is Saturday, not Sunday according to scripture. But the church has its day of worship on Sunday according to tradition. Thus declaring that tradition overrules Yahuvah's law and testimony (truth). Sabbath vs day of worship PRO says I’m confusing the terms the Sabbath with the day of worship, but am I really? Sunday is a Catholic institution and its claim to observance can be defended only on Catholic principles..... From beginning to end of Scripture there is not a single passage that warrants the transfer of weekly public worship from the last day of the week to the first." - [1] "The civil authorities should be urged to cooperate with the church in maintaining and strengthening this public worship of God, and to suzpport with their own authority the regulations set down by the church's pastors. For it is only in this way that the faithful will understand why it is Sunday and not the Sabbath day that we now keep holy." - [2] "Protestants...accept Sunday rather than Saturday as the day for public worship after the Catholic Church made the change. But the Protestant mind does not seem to realize that.in observing the Sunday, in keeping Christmas and Easter, they are accepting the authority of the spokesman for the church--the Pope." – [3] "If Protestants would follow the Bible, they should worship God on the Sabbath Day. In keeping the Sunday they are following a law of the Catholic Church." – [4] Throughout all the sources I have, the church says, and I quote above, “Sunday and not the Sabbath day that we now keep holy.” In other words, Sunday is the new Sabbath day to the church, Sunday is the new day of worship. Acts 20:7 PRO went to say that I am biblically inaccurate to say Acts 20:7 is describing Saturday as the first day of the week. I am not saying the first day is Saturday as a whole. PRO is ignoring the counting of Hebraic days, sunset to sunset. The first day of the week begins Saturday evening at sunset, not twelve midnight. They broke bread on Saturday evening, preached until midnight and departed on Sunday morning. Truth As I have shown, the Biblical definition of truth is the law and the testimony, so 1 Timothy 3:15 can read: But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the law and the testimony. – 1 Timothy 3:15 In other words, if the church says X and the Bible says Y, you’re in the wrong church irrespective if they claim a lineage to the apostles, because the church should be the pillar of Y. The scribes and Pharisees claimed the lineage of Abraham and was denounced. In other words, if you truly want to hold to the lineage of the apostles, then you would do Y and not X. Tradition Contrary to PRO’s claim, my emphasis was on tradition of men overruling or becoming the law. There are traditions that I do keep, for instance, the tradition of washing your hands. Yet PRO’s claim is in reality more than tradition, it is pushed as a law according to the sources [2] and [4]. PRO then uses Matthew 18:18 to say that Christians’ practices are outside the Bible and based on tradition. But this is contrary to what scripture says, All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: – 2 Timothy 3:16 If we were to look at customs, why the customs of mere mortal man? Why not to Christ Himself. And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read. – Luke 4:16 Matthew 18:18 in context is speaking about sinning against your brother, not that the church can do as it pleases it. Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. … Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times? – Matthew 18:16,21 The phrase of binding and loosing here is, if someone doesn’t keep the law like the fourth command, in other words someone who is sinning, and even after the church has spoken to him, the church has the authority to reject the man as not part of the body of Christ. If the man repents of his sin and wants to start keep the law, like honour the Sabbath day, the church has the authority to accept the man back as part of the body of Christ. And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican. – Matthew 18:17 Contradictions Let me quote Galatians 5:4 using PRO’s logic. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever you are justified by the law in honouring your parents or not murdering or keeping the Sabbath; ye are fallen from grace. – Galatians 5:4 (PRO) But let me give you my interpretation. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever you are justified by the law in sacrificing animals again; ye are fall from grace. – Galatians 5:4 (CON) I don’t know about you, but I don’t know of a verse in the Old Testament where people had to keep the fourth commandment or the fifth to have their sins atoned for. Again, PRO says the law doesn’t apply to Christians, by definition he is saying Christians can sin as they please, for sin is the transgression of the law. The law applies to all mankind [Ecc 12:13] And PRO contradicts Jesus’ statement: Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. – Matthew 5:19 Either PRO is correct, that Jesus was lying because Christians doesn’t need to keep the commandments and Paul says you can do what you please because you have grace, or PRO’s interpretation of Galatians 5:4 is wrong and Paul was speaking of people doing sacrifices again. If you are back doing sacrifices, you basically deny the Jesus came in the flesh to die for you. Lord’s Day I have challenged this. If you want to worship on the Lord’s Day, according to Scripture you have two options… A) You have to wait until His coming to worship Him, or B) You have to worship Him on Saturday. Nowhere is here a reference in Scripture pointing to Sunday as the Lord’s Day, but of people making it up and putting it down as tradition. Conclusion The day of worship is the Sabbath day according to Yahuvah and the holy writ. The day of worship is Sunday according to the church and tradition. Sources [1] Catholic Press, Sydney, Australia, August 1900 [2] Roman Catechism, 1985 [3] Our Sunday Visitor, February 5, 1950. [4] Albert Smith, Chancellor of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, replying for the Cardinal, in a letter dated February 10, 1920.