Re re-upload: God cannot be morally good while giving humans free will

Thank you for being honest with your position. If I had to pick what best categorises me it would be Nihilism. Purpose is subjective and morals are different from a serial killer and the average person. I argue that there is a "bigger picture" in play that none of us are capable of perceiving. What if the "bigger picture" is that God is evil? Christianity cannot prove God being all good so I can assume the "bigger picture" is him using us as guinea pigs or maybe God created us but has not impacted the word the day God created it. I think it is difficult to believe that the pain and suffering was required for people to be good. What we do require if I was God would be using logic over our instincts. This will allow us to primarily use logic that can help improve our situations without it getting worse. Our planet has existed for approximately four and a half billion yearsI highly doubt Christians believe that to be the case. Tragic as it may be, It is this endless cycle of peaks and troughs that has given rise to the highly advanced life forms that thrive today. Way of life has been drastically increased over the past 20 years. To say we are still having the same pain and suffering I think would be a lie. The longer humans continue the better we can make peoples lives. It is not history is doomed to repeat itself. It is: history, If we have not improved, Is doomed to repeat itself. We have improved and our lives are better. We live longer, Less risk of illness and have multiple ways to live a prosperous life. This goal-oriented suffering--this odyssey destined to the fulfillment of the bigger picture--is why I believe that God is morally good. I would believe that would be the case but some people all have suffering their life or if we could have measurements on the balance of good and bad in someone's life I would say not everyone has an equal balance and some do have worse life's. The people living under Kim in North Korea. Saudi Arabia having women as objects. Children who have cancer for the entirety of their life until they die. If those 3 examples are true then you would be wrong. God cannot be morally good by having these people have bad lives. would be to accept that there is no plan--no purpose for our existence. I think the only objective purpose we can have is to survive. People are different and they want different things. Which is Why I am different to you. By saying we have objective purpose people end up eventually ending up at the same outcomes. Objective purpose can be to die but that is not what Christianity says. It say to follow God. I would say if it was objective why isn't everyone following the religion like how everyone requires food to fuel him/herself? To me God can easily show everyone proof but God does not. Maybe Christianity is false because not everyone is following it. They even have assumptions that Christians should follow with non-believers. This can be to convert with what the Americans did with Manifest Destiny or believe them to be liars. I am assuming this but the Bible does imply Christians are good and non-believers are bad so I do not think what I said was a stretch. If what I said is true then the Bible is also wrong in that part. The argument matters more then the person saying it. Example: A serial killer says the Earth is spherical like. Looking at evidence we can believe the serial killer to be telling the truth but if the Bible does imply non-believers are liars or do not tell the truth then we do not believe the serial killer. argument could perhaps be made as to the benefits of civil and moral conduct in order to better the life of the individualYes it puts more emphasis on the individual. We cannot prove what happened before humans existed or what will happen after we die so why not only care about the thing we assume we know. We exist in this reality and why not make the most of it? Since as far science knows this is the only life we have. What would be the point of spending our meager 80 years in the universe worrying about the well-being of others? Because love is a mix of chemicals and hormones. It does irrational things. A man can run into a burning to save his child. Why did he do that? Because of the irrational feeling of love. would anything we do actually matter? You can say to 5 different people something and they can say 5 different answers. I don't care, Heard of it didn't watch it, I can't believe that happened since I was supporting the opposing side, That was amazing since we won and it was a great match. Different things matter to different people. Nothing apart from survival is objective matter so this is already the case. What would be the point of spending our meager 80 years in the universe worrying about the well-being of others? To enjoy it since as far as I know we are not going to have another 80 years in this reality. Quoted you again since I had something else to say. I believe a number of concepts in the Old Testament to be antiquated and in dire need of an update. Did like you being honest before what you said hear. Appreciate it. By saying it requires update then the Bible does not transcend time. Going against its traces to God since if humans change a Godly inspired book it ceases to be so since humans are flaws and the book would be was divinely inspired until someone changed it. Or enter our world and dimension through a vessel in order to show us--to tell us that Jesus is the example which we must follow. I think we both know this is the best option. Jesus has not lived on with everyone following Christianity. The benefit to having a person whom we should strive to emulate is that it is a much more flexible way of conveying morality; regardless of the era in which we live, We can always consider Jesus to be a shining example of the best that man has to offer. By having someone perfect we have nothing more to work for. By saying this is perfection we do not allow other perfections or necessary improvements to be perfect. The perfect cannot be followed because he does not relate to the average person who is not perfect and would look at them with envy. They would say why wasn't I the son of God? Why have you made us flawed so that we can use envy to be jealous of what Jesus is? Whether or not God should even be considered as the moral foundation in the first place. Closing argument would be we do not know we are all his guinea pigs any more then God loves us. The 3 examples above points that God is evil since not everyone has a balance of pain and pleasure. Someone have more pain then pleasure. You can say God has a plan or something but then that would logically follow that we should not do anything until something happens. Example: We should not cure cancer victims because it is part of God's plan. We should not invade North Korea or Saudi Arabia because it is apart of God's plan. I should not do something with my live because I should wait until God makes me part of God's plan. Everything I said here can be brushed off as God's plan but that is stopping us figuring out improvements to our life and giving every action to God gives no room to argue whether it was wrong that the person raped someone. If I follow you correctly that would be part of God's plan.