The Earth is not 6000 years old

You make the assertion that the earth is 4.5 billion years old, but what evidence do you have that the earth is this old? Biological evidence for an age of the earth of around 6000 years: The finding of pliable blood vessels, blood cells and proteins in dinosaur bone is consistent with an age of thousands of years for the fossils, not the 65 plus million years claimed by the palaeontologists. The first one to make this discovery was Dr Mary Schweitzer, an evolutionist, who said, "when you think about it, the laws of chemistry and biology and everything else that we know say that it should be gone, it should be degraded completely [after millions of years]." Nova Science Now, May 2010 Many fossil bones "dated" at many millions of years old are hardly mineralized, if at all. This contradicts the widely believed old age of the earth. DNA extracted from bacteria that are supposed to be 425 million years old brings into question that age because DNA could not last more than thousands of years. The decay in the human genome due to multiple slightly deleterious mutations each generation is consistent with an origin several thousand years ago (Sanford, J: Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Human Genome. Ivan Press 2005). The very limited variation in the DNA sequence on the human Y-chromosome around the world is consistent with a recent origin of mankind, thousands not millions of years. Other evidence: Carbon-14 in coal, oil, fossil wood and diamonds: Carbon-14 only lasts thousands, not millions of years. Evidence of recent volcanic activity on earth"s moon is inconsistent with its supposed vast age because it should have long since cooled if it were billions of years old. Human history is consistent with a young age of the earth: Length of recorded history, origin of various civilizations, writing etc. all about the same time several thousand years ago. The origin of agriculture: secular dating puts it at about 10,000 years and yet that same chronology says that modern man has supposedly been around for at least 200,000 years. Surely someone would have worked out much sooner how to sow seeds of plants to produce food. Many road or highway cuttings world-wide, through high ground, hills and mountains show multiple sedimentary layers that were laid down in quick succession before setting (like concrete). Secular science claims that these sedimentary layers were formed separately over millions of years rather than as a result of a catastrophic universal flood. Some evidences that refute this: "The alleged great ages between the layers does not account for the lack of erosion between them. There are clean lines marking the different layers indicating that they were all formed together in quick succession before they could be disturbed by erosion. "Objects like boulders and trees are embedded in and pass through many layers at the same time. "Vast thicknesses of sedimentary layers folded or doubled back on themselves with no signs of stress or cracking showing that all the layers were soft during the process of being folded, indicating that they were all laid down within a short time. "No mechanism is able to form these vast world-wide sedimentary deposits, which can be seen exposed on mountains and in valleys (like the Grand Canyon), other than a world-wide catastrophic flood, which had to be deep, fast, and of enormous power in order to be able to move and sort such a vast quantity of earth, huge boulders and silt into layers covering whole continents the world over. For more information go to creation.com