Evolution vs Creationism

I can't believe how much you deviated from the main subject here. Your topic of debate was 'Creationism' not 'Bible accuracy'. You are thinking 'The bible was right about this and that, so this prove creationism is right'. No. Simply no. In fact, this kind of thinking is not encouraged by science at all. Your logic, 'to show that part of bible is right, so the whole book must be right' is simply wrong. These are just verses. They could mean anything you want them to mean. You could interpret the verse "upon the circle of the earth" as the earth is spherical, But I'm pretty sure a person who believe the earth is flat would interpret it as the earth is flat like a circle. You say it's a dinosaur, I say it's just a rhino (by the way, how did you concluded that it had a strong tail by that verse?) It is just the way you understand it. Bible is not teaching any science. And don't forget the bible wasn't originally written in english either. Who knows, maybe it was changed, because everything changes. If you look into the Quran, there's thousands of similar verses that one might think as science. Does that mean Allah is the god? Does that mean you are going to hell for not believing in Allah? You believe man was created using a rib, they believe man was created using mud, but are we really need that kind of primitive answer? Just admit it, the only reason you believe creationism is because the bible says god created you. You were taught that when you were young, and you never looked back. If you were born in middle east, you would say Allah created you. Religion is relative, Science is Absolute. We don't teach two versions of science in the world. Unlike religion, science doesn't require any authorities to keep accurate, because it is the reality. The false cannot survive in science. That's why we don't teach any superstition in science, because they are all false and not evidence based. Yes, let's suppose you did put forward evidence of creationism (which you fail to do in all these rounds) You know what? If the evidence is stronger than the other side of the argument, Yes, I would definitely believe in creationism. Let me put it in this way "I'm open to anything for which there is evidence. Show me a god and I will believe in him. If Jesus Christ comes down from the sky during the halftime show of this Sunday"s Super Bowl and turns all the nachos into loaves and fishes, I'll think two things: first, "How dare he interrupt Madonna, she is going to be pissed." And two: "Oh look at that, I was wrong. There he is. My bad. Praise the lord!" This is a quote from Bill Mahar. Show me a god and I will believe it. All you are doing is taking the assumption that the bible is always correct, hence the creationism mentioned in the first chapter must be right. As I said before, to prove the book is correct, one should not read from the book. It is equivalent to me trying to prove Harry Potter is real, just by reading from his book. It's ridiculous. Evolution is a fact. Scientist unanimously agrees. Why do you think that your book has a greater source of knowledge than the modern science? Knowledge built up on the shoulder's of others. There won't be an Einstein without a Newton. Scientists are complicated people. They think of evidenced based reality not scripture based superstition, and you calling them liars and deluded. Evolution is the truth. We even have modern applications of evolution. Why do you think we have to produce new types of vaccinations everyday? Why do we need to produce new types of insecticides, pesticides and herbicides everyday? It's because the pests evolve! They adapt and become new species! Evolution takes millions of years to happen, We can't see it because we don't live long enough. But theres few visible instances[1]. My last video suggest something very important, if you have watched it. It shows a collection of human like skeletons from a single valley. If god created us in the current form, we have a problem in terms of evidence, because evidence says that humans evolved. Before you deny the evidence, I kindly ask to look at that video on Round 2 and suggest me an alternative Biblical explanation. And yes, in the court of law, I'm pretty sure they are expecting evidence rather than testimonies, because anyone could lie. Evidence don't lie. Evidence isn't a reasonable doubt. You are again repeating the same thing over and over, I'm pretty sure anyone who's gonna read your argument is going to find your argument is repeating the same point, and going off the topic. For the last time, Evolution doesn't explain how the Big band happen, or how the Earth happened, how energy is created, or how universe came from nothing[2], or how the life originated (although I already gave the modern scientific aspect of that in my previous arguments). And for the second time, Evolution isn't a random event, calling it random means you don't understand what evolution is. By reading your passage about Bible, I think you don't understand what bible is. Bible is a collection of written accounts. It's a collection of gospels. Gospels writers never met Jesus or anyone in the bible, they are at least decades away from the reporting events. And there are many gospels left out of the bible too. In other words It's just a collection of books, and some events contradict other events, which is fine because it was written by people, normal people. They like to make things up, because that's what most writers do, they do fiction all the time. Even in the courts this happen, Some people even lie on the courtroom and still they pass as testimonies. Some events maybe correct, some may not. But it's just pure ignorance to think all the events actually happened, like the events noah's ark, which is laughable in 21st century. I doubt those numbers you are pulling because you have not mentioned any resource. No, I didn't knew that many christians are killed annually, is that some proof of creationism, if not why bother to mention here at all. I do have the same question in mind, why did Jesus is the only one to be famous, while other persian gods, like Mithra, Horus and even Krishna has the same story of Jesus, born to a virgin, crucified, resurrected on the third day, and saviour of the mankind[3]. Those religions did died out. No, I cannot disprove god, tooth fairies, bigfoot, flying spaghetti monster, Thor, Zeus and infinite number of imaginary things. You are the one claimed the existence of anything so the burden of proof is on you. But to some degree I can prove god doesn't exist because I have alternative theories supported by evidence. Yes, I can prove my own existence, even after my death by evidence of me, my physical body, well documented records and photographic evidence. Yes, I can prove my existence with science. Because science is based on observations and you can simply observe me. I believe this is the last round of this debate, I apologise for going off the topic, I only did that because I tried to explain something you went off the topic. Opinions are opinions, But it is important that we teach our younger generations fact, not fiction. It is time to let those bronze age myths go. I don't know about you, but I like to live in the present, where there's plenty of evidence to the past. It's funny how we both are convinced about what we know is the correct version of the reality, It seems like you and me have different opinions but both cannot be true. Only one is right. Let it be then. My closing question would be, 'Do you want to believe? Or do you want to know?' Thank you, may flying spaghetti monster bless you. [1] Visible evolution http://news.nationalgeographic.com... [2] Theres a book about 'A Universe from nothing by a physicist http://tinyurl.com... [3] Similarity of jesus's story with others http://youtu.be...