Vince Carter is the best dunker of all time

Since this is the last round I won't bring new evidence, but will merely reiterate and conclude. My opponent on the other hand has failed to do this. Dunk Contest and Standards of Measurement. The first point necessary to deconstruct Pro's case is to show that by dismissing the NBA dunk contest as insufficient evidence, he has in effect dismissed his own standards of evidence as well. Consider that Pro took a poll from a simple forum as supposed evidence that the NBA dunk contest must be fixed or that he takes as evidence mere arguments from authority, such as the opinions of Kobe Bryant and DeMar DeRozan(a player with suspicious motives anyhow seeing as he lost in 2011). Along with this Pro is trying to use a short documentary made in favor of Carter based solely on subjective factors. My point is that Pro is employing a double standard. How is it that the NBA dunk contest is totally fixed and subjective and all that, but a tiny sampling of players or an Internet forum poll are alright? If Pro is to be consistent in his application of these epistemic standards then his own evidence must be discarded as well. It must be admitted by both Pro and Con to this debate that the subject matter of this debate means objectivity will always be a problem. What is needed are standards which can be at least approximated. The original standards argued (statistics, style, cultural impact)provide the best standard of measurement available. At the very least it is better than the non-existent standard which Pro has provided. (A) Statistics The fact that Jordan participated in more dunk contests is a valid point I'll admit. However the point totally fails when one considers how long Carter and Jordan were in the NBA respectively. Vince Carter has been in the NBA since 1998 (14 years and counting) while Jordan played for about 14 years in all. However, in the span of Jordan's career, he won 2 NBA dunk contests (winning 2/3 of the times he participated) with perfect scores on 4 of his dunks. Carter on the other has only participated in one NBA dunk contest in 2000 so of course he would have fewer perfect dunks. Pro's point may be turned back against him. Carter has had less perfect dunks because he has participated less times. But would the best dunker of ALL time really only be called on to participate in the NBA slam dunk contest one time in 14 years? (B) Cultural Impact Pro, knowing that Jordan has clearly had a larger cultural impact on dunking, has dismissed cultural impact as a relevant factor in determining who the best dunker is. But he failed to respond to the point that in the realm of music, bands like Led Zeppelin or The Beatles have been generally recognized as the greatest not only because of their style itself, but owing to the impact that style had on everyone around. Michael Jordan is the face of basketball and his free throw dunk has certainly had the most revolutionary impact on dunking. Pro's point that Carter can't be held responsible because dunking was revolutionized before his time is also moot since if he really is the greatest then surely his revolutionary impact on dunking would be at least comparable to that of Jordan. It's not and thus Jordan wins on that point. Pro's Burden of Proof It should be remembered that Pro did have the primary burden of proof in this debate. However it was the Con who actually brought a counter-argument and Pro has primarily only attempted to refute that. No unique argument in favor of Carter's superiority was brought in this debate besides a few Youtube videos. Thus even if it were granted that the points in favor of Jordan's superiority were (though they aren't), one would still be justified in voting Con since Pro still has the Bop left unfulfilled.