PS3 is better than Xbox 360

Wow, you must be new to this kind of stuff. "The ps3 doesn't look like a grill and whoever thinks it does is a moron." Subjective, just as if you would say the 360 looks like crap, oh wait... "360 looks like a old dell PC." Huh, spoke too fast. "Even critics agree that the ps3 is sexy." Appeal to authority much? Anyways, looks of the machine is irrelevant when judging a GAMING PLATFORM. It's for, at least primarily: playing GAMES. "Now also ps3 can be customized like the 360. " Exactly, PS3 borrowing from its rival, at least you admit it. "Now let's talk about the controllers." You mean the ones that Sony screwed you over on at the time of the machine's release? No rumble or anything? "Also the ps3 was announced before the Wii so it stole nothing." Ha really? Even if this was true, the motion control in the PS3 controller wasn't. Batteries in the 360 controller? So? Rechargeable batteries exist, even play and charge kits, and they aren't expensive. "Some are even wired" you say? So? you present a problem then present the solution to the problem and try to make it look like a new problem. Blu-ray runs faster? Well, PS3 games have longer load times, so its funny you say that. In NHL 2008, scroll through the teams, you'll find the machine can't even keep up with bringing the team logos at the same time as the names, 360, despite DVD has no problem. You can support 7 controllers, I can do 4, well end of the world isn't it? When are you gonna have 7 people over? I have Xbox Live, which (Try to refute this) lags far less than your online game mode. Public humiliations? Have you ------------->SEEN<------------- Sony's press conference at E3 2006? Yeah, don't talk about humiliation. OH! And remember your precious motion controller? What transpired when Phil tried warhawk, live demonstration with that motion controller? He couldn't steer the plane for his life. Graphics? Okay, this debate is not worth having, you know why? At potential, you might one, currently, you don't. There is hardly a difference between the two systems in graphics to this date, and you can look on gametrailers to see comparisons. In GTA 4 , the PS3 has a more buildings that pop-up than the ps3. Read this, and understand. Ps3 came out after 360, third party people, like EA sports, when they make an NBA game, it looks better on 360 as of now. Why? The people who make the team are new to PS3 technology, they are familiar with 360's and can therefore crank more power out of it. HA, and you talk about gta4, I didn't even read that part until now. And you DARE say, you DARE say that you have better games? You're serious, I'm not even gonna subject that claim to humiliation. That is just ridiculous. First, I know, taste in games are subjective, but if you actually went to check game rankings on these games, you'll find 360 games get better reviews overall, although I do not think that matters in this debate. You, if you're going to reply to anything, reply to this. Sony has lost many exclusive games, like Assassin's creed, GTA 4, now even final fantasy. Why? Cause the people who make the games know they will be broke considering how poorly PS3 sales are going, so do not even talk to me about which company treats their customers better. Finally, do you know about how Sony screwed over their fans in E3 2007? They announced a price drop, but never said that it was temporary, this was all over the blogs at the time, of people saving up and getting ready to buy one now that they can afford it, they get to the store ONE week after, and it's back to the original price. The price drop was only for a specific version of the PS3, which was in limited quantity, hence pulling a political tactic of bait and switch. To sum up, I dare you to reply to this entire post. You just seem so ignorant and lost in what you're saying, and then go on to be a hypocrite by talking about fanboys of the 360. You don't even know what you're talking about and you throw accusations of being a fanboy and at the same time act like one.