Gay Marriage Is Absolutely Okay

IntroductionI think it's important to briefly talk about how my stance is not one of hatred, My stance is only of discrimination, But we discriminate against people all the time. I used my last point as one to highlight the origins of anti-gay sentiments. Such sentiments could be used to encourage (forgive my language) less faggatory within societies that needed men to not only reproduce, But to fight without any homosexual distractions. We also have a problem with more men being raped than women, If you would look to the prison system you'd see this is true, In an effort to stop gays from raping men, It's important to grasp the issue by the balls and get it under control, But I have digressed, We're talking specificity about allowing gay people to do a historically non-gay thing. Straight syndromme-A straight man would not want to do gay things. -A Jew would not want to do Islamic things. -A cat would not want to do dog things. Why is it then that gay people, Want to do anti-gay things? Specifically marriage, Which has been an anti-gay thing for a very long time. Could it be an attack on freedom of religion, Whereby gay people will not allow the sanctity of marriage to be between a man and a woman, Out of spite? The argument from boar. Gays are trying to make a statement, Every man has the same rights, Gay rights, Are special rights. I could claim I am sexually attracted to wild boar and would like to marry one, Unfortunately for me, Marrying a wild boar and attempting to make love to the boar is illegal, Even if the boar consents, Why? Because we're worried about the animals rights activists claiming it's wrong, When by gay logic, One should be allowed to marry whatever they want. All gay logic can be applied to animal shagging logic. If we are to say gay marriage is okay, Then we are to say animal shagging is okay. The argument from pedophilia. I will not talk about this one in depth for obvious reasons, But giving gays marriage opportunity opens up many potential threats such as a pedo's right to marry, As long as the child consents, Gay logic tells us, Pedo marriage is okay. We're opening up a dangerous opportunity, One we may regret. Refutation. My first point was a very good one and I am disappointed you'd assert there is a hole in my argument, Allow me to clarify any confusion you may be experiencing. [1] My 1st example regarding the eating of pork in a mosque is correct. It is illegal, There have been many instances where people have been arrested (in UK law) under the public order act 1986 which makes an offence for generally harassing, Alarming or offensive behaviour. We allow Islam to uphold such practices, Yet we are willing to persecute the more vulnerable religions. This attack on vulnerability is unjust, It very clearly states in the Bible that marriage is between a man and a woman, If you don't like this, Then come up with your own religious practices, Don't steal and deface this sacred practice held by so many Catholics, Christian and the likes. [2] Christians are not the only ones who get married obviously. It does not say in the Bible that other religions cannot use the practice of marriage, So your point is moot. Being gay is highly taboo in many cultures around the world, It always has been a source of social jest, Especially among young children, The big insult when I were a kid was "GAYLORD" upon being called a gaylord, A kid did not feel like a noble, Nor he of high birth, Because it was not a compliment. Culture, Society and even children understand the implications of a gay society. From a biological perspective, A gay culture could be dangerous and lead to a decline in population or a weakened and vunerable country. This is known as "Gayification" and as saint Alex Jones once said "THEY'RE TURNING THE FRINKIN FROGS GAY" Wisers words have rarely been uttered. [3] You misread my 3rd point. My 3rd point is based on under population- using Japan as a source regarding its dangers. I never mentioned overpopulation. This point was made to tell us that, Anti-gay sentiments do not come from a source of hatred, Rather, They come from one of genuine concern. Allow me to leave you with one last point if I may. If discrimination is based on hatred alone, -Why do we discriminate against people under 18 by not giving them the vote, Forcing them into school and providing them with free dental care (until they're 18 and in the UK. )-Why do we discriminate against those that have broken a leg over those that have a headache? -The list would go on if I could be bothered, But you get the idea. Let's not pretend discrimination is bad, It is a tool and it has its uses. Such tools can only be bad if bad intention are behind the motive.