Conditional Election

Since I am aware that you disagree with unconditional election, I will be providing pieces of evidence that support it in this round. I will fully define unconditional election: God does not foresee an action or condition on our part that induces Him to save us. Rather, Election rests on God’s sovereign decision to save whomever He is pleased to save. Conditional election is the view that man’s “free will” decision to accept Christ as Savior is the basis for his/her election. You will need to "debunk" this idea from logic and scripture. "I do not agree with you about God 'looking down the corridors of time. ' He didn't have to look, He already knew. "- This is a needless distinction to make. Of course he knew. I'm not saying he had to look; rather, I am saying that conditional election proponents usually concede it is an action he performed to elect people. If you disagree with that, You would be affirming that God doesn't act, Which is problematic. The point is conditional election proposes that God elected people based on his foreknowledge of their faith in him, Which I am going to attempt to disprove. Point 1. Conditional Election is in disagreement with John 10:26-27. In John 10:26-27, Jesus says, [KJV] "But ye believe not, Because ye are not of my sheep, As I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, And I know them, And they follow me. . . "-Conditional election says that people who believe are chosen as His sheep because they believe, But the Bible actually says just the opposite. The reason they believe and have faith is that they are His sheep. Election is not conditional upon man’s acceptance of Christ as Lord and Savior but is instead the cause of his acceptance. Point 2. If election is based on us, And what we do, We get the glory, Because we "chose" God. Conditional election leads to the conclusion that God’s actions in election are dependent upon man’s free will choices. This view of election and salvation makes God subject to the whims of men and their decisions, And man’s will becomes essentially the cause and effect of salvation. Point 3. Verses such as 1 Peter 1:1-2 and Romans 8:29-30 are not in conflict with unconditional electionCon and others reading this debate can look up the verses mentioned above. We are in agreement that God foreknows who will be saved and who will not. "According to the foreknowledge of God the Father" is not the only part of election. Ephesians 1:4-5 states, “He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, That we should be holy and blameless before Him. In love He predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, According to the purpose of His will. ” This says that God predestined us for adoption According to the Purpose of His will. So, It is not just foreknowledge; he didn't predestine us just because of his foreknowledge of our actions. Point 4. Romans 9:11 strongly supports unconditional electionRomans 9:11 states, ". . . the children not yet being born, Nor having done any good or evil, That the purpose of God according to election might stand, Not of works but of Him who calls. " This section of Scripture clearly teaches that election is NOT conditioned on anything man has done or will do but that it is solely based on the divine will of a sovereign God [so does the Ephesians verse given above]. With unconditional election, ALL of the glory is given to God. He didn't elect us based on something, We did, Or based on something he knew we would do, But for his infinite, Impartial, And glorification purposes. We can rest in knowing that God didn't decide to save us because we were smarter, Better, Or more spiritual than others, But because of His divine purposes. I look forward to your rebuttal and arguments.