Many homos are playing some gay friendly heteros for fools by turning some gay, deceiving them, ect.

I will now be moving on to my rebuttals. [1] "There hasn't been a scientific investigation specifically about environmental factors effecting animal's sexual orientation and what percentage of animals became gay because of environmental factors. " Really? Because you make the claim that we have no idea why animals gain their sexual orientation and then pasted in two different links to two different articles doing exactly what you said we as humans couldn't possibly do. Now, as for your "mercury causes birds to be gay" article, National Geographic did an article on the same scientific claim. And interestingly enough, it states that the animals do not turn homosexual, but they instead have behavioural patterns by which they pick males over females. They built a nest, performed sexual intercourse and remained with one another for the usual one month pattern. But the cause of this "sexuality change" is not simply because homosexuality is some kind of physical dysfunction one gets in reaction to a bad chemical imbalance triggered by the environment, but because two reasons: 1) the birds were incapable of reproduction due to the poisoning and 2) the chemical had thrown off the hormonal balance the birds once had, making them unsure of themselves, and the instead chose to side with having a male partner. There are some cases where animals and humans have similar anatomies and such other, take for instance the comparison between some of the more common primates and homo sapiens, some of these things include intellectual patterns, sexual activities and biological similarities [including brain size]. . http://listverse.com...A study was done that was quite large (with 818 participants, all of whom were homosexual) in order to determine whether or not homosexuality had any direct links to genetics. What was found, is quite interesting. . http://www.natureworldnews.com...http://www.iflscience.com... [2] "Many species also practice cannibalism, mental disorders pedophilia and incest. Using your logic, we should embrace incest, pedophilia and cannibalism among humans because animals do it. "I'm not saying that at all, you're trying to strawman this. Homosexuality is not doing damage like cannibalism [potentially] pedophilia and [normally] incest will. Homosexuality is simply a sexuality that is just as natural as heterosexuality. Homosexual behaviours do not harm people, they are not eating people, raping them or having sexual affairs with their families automatically because they are gay. Yet at the same time there is only so much we can do when animals experience those things, though I do agree they shouldn't be accepted. However, your comparison is still far-fetched, homosexuality is not malicious. "The human anatomy SPECIFICALLY does not sit well with homosexual behavior. UNLIKE homosexual non-human species, homosexual humans are far more likely to trigger deadly std epidemics, spread deadly STDS and have much higher rates of deadly stds"Pro makes this far fetched statement but has no source cited. In fact, the "homosexuals cause and spread AIDS/HIV" myth has been existent for a long time. And the actual answer to what caused the spread of the AIDS epidemic is quite simple: AIDS is in fact an archaic virus that was started by colonists who consumed monkey brains. . http://www.thenazareneway.com...http://www.dailymail.co.uk...Now another important thing to note is that just because gay people are more likely to contract a disease, does not mean they actually will. As the world adapts and its technologies advance, the likelihood of contracting an STI/STD will only substantially lower. The means of having safe sexual interactions is much higher now than it was thirty years ago, and it will continue to be this way as time progresses and new ways of preventing STI/STD's and pregnancy are discovered. However, the most recent study that actually supported the claim that "gay men are 44 times more likely to contract HIV" was performed in 2002, leading one with common sense to believe the information is outdated - that study was thirteen years ago and the study was not done just with an analysis of the AIDS statistics, but with the statistics of all other STI/STD contraction rates among the gay and bisexual male populace. [3] As I had addressed before, someone cannot be "turned straight/gay/etc" by a friend. If that person was willing to participate in homosexual interactions or were attracted to a homosexual person, that obviously they were not straight. A human's sexuality is not black and white, it is complicated, it is a journey and it is a struggle. . http://brutereason.net... Your link for your 'late life Lesbians' source is also broken, and leads to something about car donations, which must be some kind of gag. I'm not interested and that is completely irrelevant to your claim and the subject at hand.