Hillary Clinton for President

Opening ArgumentHillary Clinton has multiple stances on multiple issues. In order to stay within the confines of this debate, I will start with her 3 stances on the most controversial issues in the United States. Gun ViolenceHillary Clinton's plan for gun control is to heavily curb the feasibility of accessibility to acquire a firearm in the United States. Her plan consists of exponentially expanding background checks in order to maintain the database of psychological evaluation prior to selling a firearm in order to lessen gun sales to the mentally unstable, accompanied by a government intervention of the controversial gun lobbies that are known for penetrating the American congress through shady financial dealings and removing the industry’s sweeping legal protection for illegal and irresponsible actions which nulls any form of responsibility for attacks. Finally, the plan also tackles the 'Charleston Loophole' of gun sales which allows gun shows and internet purchases to skip background checks [1]. I can assume my opponent will start his rebuttal in round two against gun violence by stating that there is no correlation between the accessibility of firearms and the number of shootings. My argument to that is that Australia is a prime example of how it can work. Australia is politically synonymous with the United States, making it applicable for using their strict firearms control as a way to curb violence to work in the US. The policies Australia had implemented federally has worked, ever since their mass shooting 20+ years ago [2]. International studies have also shown causation between the feasible accessibility of guns and the quantity of shootings, whereas stricter policies will help with the occasional mass shootings in the United States [3]. Foreign PolicyHillary Clinton is also against the conventional American policy of "Invade First, Ask Questions Later" has proven to be a failure in the advancement of global stability and American ideals. Hillary Clinton has advocated for more diplomatic congregations instead of blatant military intervention and economic sanctions which prove harmful to the World Economy, and not just the targeted nation [4]. Hillary Clinton also thoroughly advocated against American intervention in Iraq [5] and currently inside Syria against Assad as she fears (and is right to do so) of the incoming power vacuum if the US does reach it's goals [6]. Tax ReformIt is no question that the United States has one of the most divisive wealth gaps in the developed world, it is an incredible abomination that .01% of the US owns over 10% of American income [7] Hillary Clinton has made many statements regarding the effectiveness of a progressive tax system which can combat wealth inequality and the profit would help against American debt [8]. Hillary Clinton has also made many statements in her taxation plan for the rich, stating that with the new income of the progressive tax system, it will help move the US towards the path of a single-payer tax system and lessened college expenses which has utterly destroyed much of the fiscal stability of American youth [9]. The ultra-rich in the United States have also known to commence industry monopolies which is another subject of economics that Clinton has advocated against with the same progressive tax reform (Refer to Source 8), a virtually un-refutable benefit to America. Conclusion Hillary Clinton's 3 most organized policy positions are a great benefit to the American socio-political and economic issues today. Her stance on gun violence has been solidified with international examples as functional, her stance on foreign policy is a great progressive leap away from the current violent tendencies of the US, and her taxation system will prove helpful against current American wealth inequality. To the voters, I will save my mentioning of Trump and immigration as my opening argument is only for the policies of Hillary. Sources[1] . https://www.hillaryclinton.com...[2] . http://www.reuters.com...[3] . http://www.sciencealert.com...[4] . http://time.com...[5] . http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com...[6] . https://www.washingtonpost.com...[7] . http://inequality.org...[8] . http://www.ontheissues.org...[9] . https://en.wikipedia.org...