Theism is more rational than Atheism.

"The topic in which we are debating is if theism is more rational than atheism. I would assume by this you mean that the belief is god/s is more based on logic and reason than the lack of. By the burden of proof, it is up to you to make points, and for me to disprove them, as far as I'm concerned. (I'm not making a claim that atheism is more rational here)" I'm not claiming what God is based on, I'm claiming the BELIEF in God is more logical than not believing in God (Or Gods, any kind should do). "It would appear to be that you're main arguments strictly rely on Pascal's Wager, and I will address it rebutting the second and third points." Not at all. Only 1/3 of my argument is based on the safety of belief, and that's not really my main argument. My main argument is that God/Gods is possible and, since it is safer to believe, it's logical. "It is true that the Universe was created at one point, but not actually from nothing. By created from nothing, I would assume you are referring to the big bang. There are many theories addressing this point such as the big bounce (In which the Universe is constantly expanding and then contracting back to singularity) or the theory that the universe was spawned from a large black hole or maybe created by membranes of a higher dimension. If you want to learn more you'll have to search it up, in respects to your 'no too big arguments' rule. But anyhow, if you are this following this notion with this new information, it would mean that god was created from a higher power, and therefore not the ultimate creator. This also rebuts your third point:" Why thank you, I see that you're a very polite person. Now, I just want to say that at SOME point, The Universe- Or it's origin, The Big Bang/Bounce/etc.. Whatever caused the first piece of anything to exist, made it out of nothing. Now, it might be a bit hard to wrap our heads around creation without creator/creation device, But there comes my second point, in which the Universe might be Eternal as well- Meaning God can come either of those ways, meaning he is possible. "Generally, you can only believe in one type of religion (Because of contradictions and etc), and there is also an infinite amount of possible 'gods', as well as a chance of no god. A percentage of this infinite amount of gods would have a punishment for non-believers (or as you say it 'divine punishment'). Naturally, any percent of infinity is infinity as well. Any atheist would have a 1/infinity chance of not have some type divine punishment, which is equal to infinity. Any type of theist would have 1/infinity-1 chance (The -1 being atheism), however, this is infinity as well meaning they have equal chances as 1/infinity=1/infinity-1" A bit confusing, yes, but you need to remember something- Atheists and Theists do not have the same chances. The only chance that Atheists have is a 1/∞ chance of not getting divine punishment. Theists have the same chance, but they also have a 1/∞ chance of getting divine reward. Back to Pascal's Wager, you really have nothing to lose. Being a Theist only adds to your chances of survival. If you're Atheist and right, then you'll just NOT get divine punishment. if you're theist and wrong, it's the same as being Atheist and wrong- Divine Punishment. But, if you're Theist and RIGHT, you get divine reward.Atheism- Right? (Yes) No Divine punishment (No) Divine PunishmentTheism- Right? (Yes) Divine Reward (No) God(s) exists? (No) No divine Punishment (Yes) Divine Punsishment As you can see by this (Really poorly made, sorry I didn't have much time) Chart, you can be either right or wrong in both sides- Only, if you're Theist and wrong, your chances of Divine Punishment are about 50% lower than Atheism, meaning even IF you're Theist and wrong, you're belief was still logical.I await your response.