Muhammad Ibn Abdullah spoke falsehoods in some authentic hadeeths

DISCLAIMERCon only offered weak arguments and refused to support them with any empirical evidence, while misinterpreting the hadeeths, ignoring certain falsehoods and sometimes even contradicting himself.In the first round, I made it clear that the nature of this debate is going to be empirical, and that Con's role is provide empirical evidence for his apologetic. Hence, Con has to accept this condition. I myself have NOT mentioned any absolute truths, but grounded this debate on an empirical basis from the opening statement, similarly to typical debates on this website, which, from what I understand, never make claims of absolute knowledge (if we were to assume that such knowledge exists). Therefore, Con's tactic of requiring absolute truths in a debate on empirical knowledge is simply a desperate attempt to derail the debate.While I do assume, for the sake of argumentation, that God exists, I don't assume that Mohammad's words and descriptions of God are absolute truths, as that would be begging the question, since the debate is to examine whether the authentic hadeeths that are listed above have any empirical truth to begin with.REBUTTALFalsehood #1: Five things only God knows*In this falsehood, Mohammad claims to know "the Five keys of the unseen knowledge," and claims that "knowledge of what is inside the womb" is one of those keys.Con responds, "...knowledge is not Absolute. And all scientists will tell you (I use word "you" in abstract and general mean) nothing (regarding knowledge) is precise, absolute, or 100%."Rebuttal: By this, Con has inadvertently established that Mohammad committed a falsehood in this authentic hadeeth. I'm going to explain this in a form of deductive argument(which ends with an absolute truth)...P1- Mohammad in the authentic hadeeth claims there are only FIVE keys to unseen knowledge."Keys of the unseen knowledge are five which nobody knows but Allah"*This sentence explicitly states that the keys are five, not that Mohammad is just telling us about five of them.P2- Con, in his response, claimed that empirical knowledge doesn't have absolute certainty, and claimed that epistemological claims which lack certainty are keys to an unseen knowledge. (Con claimed that, "nobody knows what is in the womb," is a key to an unseen knowledge, given that scientists are only "95%" sure of what is inside the womb).Conclusion: According to Con's reasoning, Prophet Mohammad committed a falsehood when he limited the keys of unseen knowledge to FIVE, since according to Pro's reasoning, the Keys of knowledge are Billions(if not more) of epistemological claims.In other words, Con declared all epistemological claims (e.g "nobody knows the health benefits of my pizza") to be keys of the unseen knowledge, because scientists are never 100% certain of such claims, although Mohammad explicitly says, "keys of the unseen knowledge are five." Therefore, such keys do not include all epistemological claims such as "nobody knows the health benefits of my pizza," which means that Pro's apologetic attributes a major falsehood to Mohammad, even if it does so inadvertently. Moreover, if Mohammad is just being inaccurate, then he is also committing a falsehood, according to the definition of "Falsehoods" in Round 1: Inaccurate or false information.Falsehood #2: Jews worship Ezra as the Son of God*In this falsehood, Mohammad claims that the Jews at Judgment Day will be punished for worshiping Ezra as the son of God.The hadeeth explicitly dictates that the People of the Scripture(Jews and Christians) will be judged after people who didn't worship God or worshiped something else(Atheists, Polytheists, Pantheists, etc) are punished.Con claims, "As you should know, worshiping someone (in Quran or in hadith) does not just mean prostrating or praying to someone or something, it also means (depending on context) giving Exclusive Attribute of God to someone or something else."Rebuttal: Except that Con has not given any shred of evidence that Jews do that to Ezra.Con further remarks, "And you aware that Arab Jews in Yemen considered Ezra as the son of God."Rebuttal: I'm only aware that this is a falsehood started by a Muslim apologist(Ibn Hazm) who was trying to come up with an apologetic for the claim that the Jews worship Ezra, even when he was located in Spain... 300 years apart from when Mohammad made that claim, when Yemen Jews themselves claim that they give Ezra the same status as every other Prophet, since they're often accused in the Jewish community for (Ironically) hating Ezra[1]. Con needs to provide a trusted, academic citation to back up his claim.Con continues, "And every nation does not mean all members of the nation, because there were atheist Jews, who did not believe even in God..."Rebuttal: "Atheists Jews" will not survive the first procedure, which starts with punishing anyone that didn't worship God. The second procedure it the one that punishes people who worshiped God plus other things. Moreover, when the "Jews" were addressed, the "religious Jews" were addressed as they are the ones that belong to the "People of Scripture," and not a heretical group, in parallel to how the majority of believing Christians(who worshiped Jesus) were addressed.In summary, Con has only given falsehoods and baseless claims, although it is clear that Mohammad refers to religious Jews who would be called forth and punished for worshiping Ezra, when the Jewish scripture dictates that Jews must only worship God (much like the Qur'an does), and when Pro has failed to show how even one Jew has ever worshiped Ezra.Falsehood #3: After fetal development, Allah determines the sex of the babyCon misrepresented the hadeeth and responded to something I wasn't even arguing. *I need to make a correction that in the previous round, I based my numbers on another graph(which I later removed because it was less detailed, but forgot to update the numbers). So I ended up saying "14 out of 17" when I meant "17 out of 23," however I realized that as soon as I clicked submit and notified Con about it immediately.*The falsehood that Mohammad commits in this hadeeth is that he says that gender is determined by Allah when the fetus is complete, when 99% of the cases of sex-determination occur during conception(sperm meeting egg), while less than 1%(cases of male-female transsexualism) occur when the sexual organs start developing(stage 17), which is not even close to when the fetus is completely shaped(stage 23). Con responded, "The hadith shows that before the development of sexual organs, no one (except God) knows the sex of a baby..."Rebuttal: This is a misrepresentation of what the Hadeeth says. The Hadeeth is clear in saying "When Allah decides to give it[The Fetus] a final shape, the angel says: My Lord, would it be male or female." The fetus begins developing sexual organs at six weeks[2]. It definitely doesn't have a final shape then. Therefore, Con here is falsely equivocating between the key-terms "right before the fetus has a final shape" and when the "sexual organs are complete," which occur at different stages, and therefore cannot be used interchangeably.Con continues, "...you cannot determine the "sex of sperm" by taking and looking at it."Rebuttal: You could, if you perform experiments. Parents who follow the in-vitro method can choose to the gender of their child, since scientists can tell if the sperm holds an X or Y chromosome through different reliable technologies and experiments[3]. For instance, Dr. Jeffrey Steinberg, clinical director of a U.S. fertility clinic, claims that his methods are 99.9% effective in specifying the gender of the baby before in-vitro conception[4].In conclusion, I didn't receive an actual response or apologetic. I only got a misrepresentation of what the Hadeeth said and a couple of unscientific claims which ignore scientific progress.SUMMARYCon has failed to provide any substantial apologetic, but first appealed to the uncertainty of all empirical knowledge, when Prophet Mohammad explicitly said that the "keys of the unseen knowledge are five" which is an explicit statement as opposed to "five of those keys are." In the second apologetic, Con used baseless assertions(which were mostly false) to try and say that some Jews worshiped Ezra(when he had absolutely zero evidence for that). For the third, Con simply misinterpreted the Hadeeth and never answered the actual falsehood; the sexual organs developing after the fetus is finally shaped, when we scientifically know that sexual organs develop much earlier, specifically in the middle of the process of fetal development--when the fetus is incomplete.Pro is expected to present substantial apologetic and empirical evidence in the next round, otherwise the voters will be 99.9% convinced that the authentic hadeeths are in the wrong, which is enough for me to satisfy the burden of proof on empirical grounds.CITATIONS[1]"The Jews of Yemen", in Yemen: 3000 Years of Art and Civilization in Arabia Felix, edited by Werner Daum, page 272: 1987[2] Geary, David C. (2009). Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences (2nd Ed.) Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.[3] Baby Girl or Baby Boy - Now You Can Choose: A Look at New Biology and No Law; Faust, Susan M. Online at: http://heinonline.org...=[4] http://abcnews.go.com...