Abrahamic Religion & Morality

So this is all subjective interpretation after all, As I originally stated. There is nothing directly from God stating "You can cherry pick the pieces you want and ignore the rest". He never said "You people have to follow these rules, But everyone else can do whatever they want". You don't get to throw out all of the pieces you don't like and only keep the pieces you like. Nor do you get to cherry pick what does or doesn't apply to you based on your personal preference. I will also add that I have yet to meet Christians that can come to a mutual agreement on what is/isn't permitted. Everyone has their own thoughts on the matter. Are you saying Israelites are more moral than non-Israelites because they have more moral guidelines to follow? Are you saying the guidelines they follow are immoral? How can God tell one group of people A is ok, But then tell another group it's not? If God is immutable and he doesn't change, Then slavery should be condoned by your world view, Right? The Bible clearly states you can own other humans, Even beat them and buy/sell them. Don't try to pass it off as indentured servitude or twist the meaning of the word slave, It's clear what it means. I will pay you the compliment in assuming you do not condone slavery, Even though your moral compass (God) says it's ok. This further illustrates my point that you do not get your morals from your religion. The fact that people can reach a moral dichotomy and rationalize themselves into the correct moral answer shows they have morals that are unfounded in their religion. I don't think you're immoral. I don't believe the majority of Muslims or Christians or Mormons are either, But, It's not due to your/their religion. If morality was a result of religious belief, All religious people would be moral, And all immoral people would be non-religious. This isn't the case. There are immoral religious people and moral non-religious people, And vice versa. You said "What if someone else's morals disagree with this? " Then it's their subjective belief. It doesn't change the objective outcome of well being. Someone can think it's ok to murder, That doesn't make it morally ok, Because murder is demonstrably negative to well being. You said "Who's to determine what's beneficial for a certain group or not? There is no absolute consensus on what is beneficial or not. We're not talking about overall religion, We're talking about Abrahamic religions. In these religions, There is no need for evolution, There is no need to improve, Since the best option is already there. It is more simple than moral relativism (Occam's razor). " Well for one, A democracy of a society. There are laws against stealing, Killing, Raping, Assaulting, Etc. These laws change/adapt over time to shift with the moral consensus of the society. Furthermore, It's usually easy to determine if the action is moral or not, Assuming a person has empathy and is of rational mind. Throwing a grenade into a group of people is immoral - why? Because it will hurt the well-being of others. It's in everyone's best interests to look out for each other's well being. It promotes a better society that is more comfortable/enjoyable to live in, Rather than a Darwinian survival of the fittest type of environment. You said there is no room to improve on Abrahamic religions. Surely you cannot be serious. I'm not even going to waste a lot of time debating this argument. They are far from the pinnacle of morality. Islam teaches that infidels and apostates should be murdered and it condones and supports pedophilia - to name just a couple reasons. Christianity teaches that slavery is permissible, Stoning people to death is ok, Rape is ok (if you buy her afterwards) and women are just property - to name a few reasons.