Resolution : God does exist

Heck..... I am going to go reverse again...... don't ask me why. 1. Why create a Universe at all ? Hasn't science shown that this immense universe was not created for us but that we are an inconsequential part of an uncreated universe ? Science can show us the Universe's dimensions but it cannot reveal any meaning or lack of meaning inherent in those dimensions. In response to this argument, the believer can simply ask, "Why can"t God choose to create a magnificent and grand universe like ours?" The critic might respond that God wouldn"t use such an inefficient process like cosmic and biological evolution and would instead create life instantaneously. Because God has unlimted resources and time due to his awesome power like the Oxford Dictionary says, there is no difficulty in him making a grand cosmos for human beings. It"s not as if God loses track of us in the expansive universe he created. Moreover, the human brain is the most complex thing in the universe, so why not think that God made a grand universe for such brains to explore? Moreover, how does the critic know with confidence that God would not create a world like ours? Suppose God made a very tiny universe with just our solar system in it. Would you think, in contrast, that such a world proves God exists? He might just as plausibly argue that if God existed, surely he would have created something grander. A small and simple universe, he might argue, is precisely what we would expect if it simply popped into existence from nothing, without a cause. As C. S. Lewis put it, "We treat God as the policeman in the story treated the suspect; whatever he does will be used in evidence against him." [i] C.S. Lewis. Miracles. (HarperCollins, New York, 1996) 79. 2. The Oxford Dictionary's Defenition of God is this, " the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the SUPREME being. " You are thinking of God as a material being. If you read my rebuttal to your arguments, you would see that God does not have a physical body. Also, one can inference from the defenition that God transcends the limitations of matter. He is supreme, not confined to Human thought. He's not confined to a body at a particular place. (And he's not restricted to living on another planet as some science fiction writers have imagined.) This is also why Catholics do not take the Bible word for word. My opponent agrees with me on the fact that a Existent Being is greater than a non existent being but asked me for a reason ? Okay..... why do you need a reason if you agree ? Are you hoping to prove a point ? My opponent has conceded this point, I think. My Glasses might be wrong. 3. Because God cannot be a Material Being as stated in my rebuttal to your arguments, My opponent's rebuttals does not make sense because he is thinking of god as a Material being. And Material Beings have limitations, and so if god is all knowing and Powerful, that cannot work. So, If God exists in the mind as an Idea, then one could reason that God has to exist in reality. 4. The Morally Perfect Problem. If Morality is a Human Convention as my opponent has asserted, why should we act Moral ? Or are we in some way held accountable for our moral decisions and actions ? If God does not exist, Morality is just a Human Convention, Morality would be wholly subjective and non-binding. First, if God exists, objective moral values exist. To say that there are objective moral values is to say that something is right or wrong independently of whether anybody believes it to be so. It is to say, for example, that Nazi anti-Semitism was morally wrong, even though the Nazis who carried out the Holocaust thought that it was good; and it would still be wrong even if the Nazis had won World War II and succeeded in exterminating or brainwashing everybody who disagreed with them. God is the foundation of our Morality. If Athiesim is true, than Moral Values do not exist. If God does not exist, where do we get our values and our morals ? This is what Pope Benedict XVI warned about, callling it Moral Relatvism, the idea that moral principles have no objective standard, so states its dictionary definition. http://news.bbc.co.uk... And finally...... Once again my opponent is thinking of God as Material, if he read my rebuttals........... and we are not arguing about if God created the universe. We are arguing if there is a God...... My first argument is Philosphical, not Scientific. Everything has a cause and effect. One can deduce without requring Evidence, that God is the first cause. My opponent has failed to explain why the argument is Philisophically untrue.....