God is Real

On Malcolm W. BrowneMalcolm Browne never had a theory called "Signal Travels Faster Than Light." He never theorized anything; Malcolm W. Browne was a journalist, not a scientist. [1] Once, he wrote an article for the New York Times titled Far Apart, 2 Particles Respond Faster Than Light. [2] I read the article. Quantum physics is spooky, mysterious stuff. As Victor Stenger says, "Quantum mechanics is thought, even by many physicists, to be suffused with mysteries and paradoxes. Mystics seize upon these to support their views." He notes, "Modern physics, including quantum mechanics, remains completely materialistic and reductionistic while being consistent with all scientific observations. The apparent holistic, nonlocal behavior of quantum phenomena, as exemplified by a particle’s appearing to be in two places at once, can be understood without discarding the commonsense notion of particles following definite paths in space and time or requiring that signals travel faster than the speed of light. No superluminal motion or signalling has ever been observed, in agreement with the limit set by the theory of relativity." [3] For more information, see the article below.Again, there are many things in science that are spooky, mysterious, difficult to make sense of, or even incomprehensible at the present moment. We should continue to study these things, scientifically. Science works from the assumption that natural phenomenon can be explained by material causes. Any paradox is easy to “solve” if we renounce materialism and resort to supernatural explanations. Lazy quacks would love to give up and say "God did it." But remember: many insurmountable mysteries of 100 years ago have genuine, scientific, materialistic, evidence-based explanations today. Instead of throwing in the towel, we should work towards making sense of these mysteries, rationally and scientifically. This means we don’t make arguments from personal incredulity. We don’t argue, “I can’t personally conceive of a materialistic explanation, therefore it’s supernatural.” That argument is fallacious. On ScienceYou seem disappointed that science has not yet answered every possible question about nature. Well, science has only existed for a few hundred years, not "billions of billions of years" as you suggest. You are correct that science has been wrong about many things."It is important to recognize the fallibility of science and the scientific method. But within this fallability lies its greatest strength: self-correction. Whether a mistake is made honestly or dishonestly, whether a fraud is unknowingly or knowingly perpetrated, in time it will be flushed out of the system by lack of external verification. The cold fusion fiasco is a classic example of the system's swift exposure to error." [6]"Faith has no checks and balances, no follow-up investigation to see if an intuition works." [7]Answers in the BibleYou encourage me to "consult your Bible" because "the answers are ALL there." All the wrong answers, maybe. I don't know about you, but when I look around myself right now, I see: my laptop, coffee maker, speakers, cell phone, smoke alarm, my clothes, my contact lenses, etc. These things are the fruit of science; not the fruit of the spirit. If all we did was "consult the Bible", I would have none of these things. The Bible certinaly does not have ALL the answers to scientific questions; it has a few makeshift answers to certain questions, and all of them are more-or-less wrong. My Opinion on GodI agree with Michael Shermer when he says, "I do not know that there is no God, but I do not believe in God, and have good reasons to think that the concept of God is socially and psychologically constructed." Unlike Victor Stenger and Richard Dawkins, I do not believe that the existence of God is a scientific issue. As Robert Carroll points out, "What scientific knowledge or empirical test could falsify the concept of an eternal non-physical consciousness with the power to create things out of nothing? [...] Claiming that the existence of gods and spirits are scientific matters opens the door and invites every variety of superstition into the science arena. They don't belong in the arena. They belong in the parking lot." [5]SOURCES[1] Malcolm W. Browne, Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org...;)[2] Far Apart, 2 Particles Respond Faster Than Light, by Malcolm W. Browne ( http://www.nytimes.com...;)[3] Quantum Quackery, by Victor Stenger ( http://www.csicop.org...;)[4] The Believing Brain, by Michael Shermer, Pages 176-177[5] Can Science Decide the God Question? by Robert Todd Carroll[6] Why People Believe Weird Things, by Michael Shermer[7] The New Atheism, by Victor Stenger