Obama deserved the Nobel Peace Prize

Nobel winners in the past have been men, women, and organizations such as Martin Luther King Jr. , Mother Teresa, and the United Nations Children's Fund. Now I ask what had Obama done as of February 1st and what has he done as of now that is up to par with men and women as mentioned above. The truth is he has not done anything yet that makes him deserve it. That does not mean he never will because he still has 3 years left and potentially 4 more. So he still has plenty of time left to do great things but so far he has not done anything to truly deserve the award. I will now talk about all the points that Pro has made. 1) WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST- Pro says that Obama has redefined why we are there and is setting us up to end the war and get out. Obama has already ordered 17,000 more troops there and may potentially send 40,000 more. How is that ending the war and getting our troops out? 2) WAR ON DRUGS- The only thing Pro says here regarding Obama is that he has not tried to get everyone riled up against drugs and that in the past he has been lenient on the subject. Why does this make him qualified to receive the Nobel? 3) WAR ON HOMOSEXUALS- Here the argument is "Obama hasn't yet ended don't ask don't tell, but at least he has the disposition to do it. " Once again just because you want to do something that does not in anyway mean you deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. 4) WAR ON MEXICANS- Again all Pro says is that Obama has not increased or encouraged this war. And once again I ask why does that qualify him for the Nobel? 5) WAR ON NON-CHRISTIANS- Obama has not catered to non Christians and downplayed the fact that he is a Christian. Thus he is reducing attacks on our country. If this is true then why after his being elected has there already been arrests made to prevent a terrorist attack. Also the same question needs to be asked does this really make him worthy of the Nobel? 6) WAR ON NON-PATRIOTS- "While Obama did vote originally for the PATRIOT Act, it was passed before anyone had a chance to read it". So Obama voted on something he had not even read? Also Pro says he is working to close Guantanamo Bay and get rid of some of the executive powers it caused. Has any of this been done yet? No. 7) WAR ON THE ENVIRONMENT- Here once again it is said Obama did not try to push on this war like predecessors. Where is the accomplishment in that? 8) WAR ON POVERTY- Pro says that Obama' s health care fight proves he is fighting poverty, so he deserves the award. No reform has been passed yet therefore nothing has been accomplished and he does not yet deserve the award. Overall Pro has simply stated over and over how Obama has not pushed any Conservative agendas and only Liberal agendas. Pro has repeatedly compared Obama to past presidents as if United States Presidents are the only ones eligible for the award. He has also repeatedly stated how Obama has all of these good intentions. But an award is based off of accomplishment. Millions of people all around the world have great ambitions but that does not qualify them for the Nobel. Obama may, in the future, make achievements worth receiving the Nobel over. But as of now he has not and therefore did not deserve the Nobel Prize, especially not in February after just being in office one month.