should all pit bulls be killed on the spot any where any time

Refutations "First off i would like to explain how to deviate a pit bull from its nature of killing all you have to do is raise it right its a simple task if your experienced. And if not all you need to do is find someone who can help you out. " 'Raising it right,' as you say, is not a valid explanation of how to stop a pit bull from killing. It would seem that you agree with me on the point that pit bulls are born to kill, if you need to 'deviate' them from killing. "And if not all you need to do is find someone who can help you out. And i have never seen anyone give these dogs a chance. " This is a major contradiction. If no one has ever given these dogs a chance, then how would someone help you out? Pit bulls have been around for 100 years. You would think that after all these attacks, someone would try to help these dogs. Someone probably has, but killing is in the pit bull's blood! This one statement of your own contradicts all your other arguments. You have stated that pit bulls will be nice when properly treated. You never showed any real situations and since people must've tried, but attacks still go on, pit bulls will kill and kill forever. "Except for one person other than the people in my family and that person is Mr. Shorty Rossi you can see the wonders of his work on his t. v. episode pit boss. " I am not familiar with the show at all and I believe that many others are not. "And i have been bitten by and attacked by many different breeds of dogs. NONE of them BEING a PIT BULL. " What does this mean? How is this relevant to the debate? Instead of offering your own personal cases, you should be showing statistics and real life situations. I have proven that pit bulls are the deadliest breed of dog with real statistics and not something that can be exaggerated such as your case. "These dogs are the best breed in the world. " Best can mean many different things. They are the best at inflicting damage, yes, and guarding possessions. They are not the kindest, the smartest, or the cutest. "And you can belive the statistics all you want to but these dogs are harmless. " My statistics are much more effective than your situations and opinions. Why the Proposition deserves to win this debate I have refuted all of my opponent's main arguments. They are not supplied with statistics, evidence, or sources, and instead, are just opinions of his own. He contradicts the entire basis of his own argument in his final argument. My opponent has not refuted any of my arguments at all. It seems he agrees with me that pit bulls are inherently dangerous, and cannot refute the statistics I have given. Innocent children will be harmed by the pit bulls and will lose their lives. He has not refuted the economic problems or the crime issues either. The Proposition has had superior spelling and grammar. The Proposition has made more convincing arguments, backed by sources and statistics. The Proposition has given sources. The Opposition has failed in conduct due to the fact that he ignoredmy arguments and forfeited two rounds. I urge the audience to vote for the Proposition. Please vote not what is in your heart, and how you feel about pit bulls, but who won the debate in actuality. I do not want to kill pit bulls either, but just wanted a good debate, which I didn't truly receive.