Solving the obesity problem - my method

Each point in turn. 1. I am rather appalled that my opponent thought I meant that I wanted to burn people at the stake with gasoline and wood. This not only would be sick but also very very wrong. When I said being burnt at the stake I meant that these people would be tied to a stake and sun burnt until death. 2. My opponent concedes that my way is more humane. Thus if at the end of this debate the reader is undecided it will be best to vote for my case, as my case is undoubtedly more humane. 3. I must once again push the fact that my plan is less expensive. The wooden stake can be reused for each body that is burnt, also it can be done locally and the meat can be sold. Thus less expensive. 4. Ah, a feasible idea to say the least. Unfortunately the bicycle kinetic converting energy machine costs quite a deal of money. In fact my old school purchased them for upwards of 1 grand each. The only way my opponent can claim this advantage is by actually handing each person 1000 dollars. Otherwise people will ride their normal bicycles at which point they will see the obese people being burnt at the stake in real life and ride their bicycles more. 5. Once again I find myself horrifying appalled.... My opponent thought that I wanted to have other humans eating the burnt obese persons. When I stated, "The large people now become a food source for our population.", I did not mean our human population, I quite clearly was referring to our dog population. This of course would only be for very wealthy owners, and would have the benefit of conserving normal dog food for less wealthy owners. 6. Transporting mass quantities of fat would simply be ludicrous. The fat would stay on the stake where it began, exercising rich people on their bicycles would take their dogs to the fat people to eat. This would solve for world hunger (dog hunger obviously) considering the fact that dogs do not need a great deal of nutrition in the first place (dog food). It would also have the benefit of solving for some human hunger considering the fact that the obese people would no longer be devouring hamburgers 24/7. 7. My plan undoubtedly prevents overpopulation. My plan kills many people and then feeds dogs with those people. How could this not stem overpopulation? 8. Finally on my points my opponent points out that gene mutations will allow the obese genes to keep resurfacing. I do not deny this fact, but it will become the only way, something my opponent doesn't seem to realize. In the status quo the obese genes surface in two ways. 1. Through mutations. 2. Through obese people breeding. Thus after the passage of my plan only option 1. will still occur. This will in turn mean that the obese gene will appear significantly less frequently. Which will of course lead to the extra fitness I mentioned earlier. Combined with points 9 and 10 which my opponent dropped we will see a world of Jedi! 11. This is a point my opponent added. She states that the obese people would become angry on passage of my plan and cause riots. Sadly my opponent seems not to have realized that the same is true of her plan. Ridiculing the obese to the point of dehumanization and then forcing them to do things against their will will also cause these riots. In fact, my opponents case will cause these riots more than mine because my case is more humane, therefor the obese will be happier with my case.