Ignorance of the Lord Justifies Being Sent to Eternal Damnation

I apologize for not responding, I've been at my grandmother's house for about 5 days. .. and she refuses to become technologically advanced (no computer). First off, her first statement about the Bible being an accurate source of information, she that the time span is the most significant factor when regarding authenticity. What the voters have to realize is that, it's a book. Granted, it does have a lot of good messages, and people do trust it, but that still does not make the entire book legitimate. Take Greek mythology for example. There were many, many stories about heroes, Gods, and things of that sort. People back then believed every word of those stories. That was how they lived their lives. We now know that, through scientific explanations, that those events could not have happened, but still convinced millions of people. Bias can also be a possibility. Here is a metaphor. Let's say that the University of North Carolina sportswriter writes a huge column about how UNC is the best basketball program ever. He's going to be a little biased, right? There are certainly other basketball clubs that are just as legitimate as UNC. Purdue, Duke, and UConn just to name a few. My opponents also says that the Bible says that everyone has heard of God. This is just like the sportswriter saying that everyone has heard of UNC. Now, it is easy to say that the majority of people in America have heard of UNC and the majority of people around the world have heard of God, but it's still not logical to think that that statement accounts for everyone. Secondly, I think that I refute her first argument on Psalms 19: 1-4. Now. .. the verse states that EVERYONE has a conscience that know God is real and alive. I didn't know about God until about, age 10. It's foolish to think that blunt statement refers to every single person. Also, I'll just state again. The bible is not a viable source of information. In response to her saying that I've made this into a "what if" situation 1. I don't see why this would be negative. I've simply given a hypothetical situation in which a person would be deemed ignorant of the word of God. 2. Again, I'll just go back to my defense of the Bible not being a viable source of information and my metaphor. Also, I'm just giving a possibility as to how the word of God couldn't be spread to them. 3. Talking about something my opponent did. .. she completely turned this debate into something it shouldn't have been. She completely ignored the resolution and went off on a little part of the resolution instead of referring to the main point of it. And, she says she doesn't understand why brought up my verse. I clearly state that it says that people who were given the chance to hear of the Lord and cast it away shall be sent to Hell. .. but again, it the Bible doesn't include every single person. And in her conclusion, she apologizes about already negating the resolution, and she retracts that statement. Please, don't take that into account. .. we're not even debating the resolution, and we've already agreed upon that. Her explanation for doing so is it's not so much about what you did or didn't do to deserve Hell, but whether or not you trusted Jesus to get into Heaven. She also says that "ignorant people are imperfect. " That statement alone proves that she believes that there ARE ignorant people. Thus, they are neither perfect nor imperfect. They're neutral. .. therefore, I do not believe that a logical and righteous God would send a neutral person to tell.