There is no scientific evidence to support evolution

I would like to apologize for missing the last round. I've been pretty busy with a real life emergency. Instead of trying to refute what my opponent has said, I will just give you something to think about. The meta-information challenge We need to get past the na"ve idea that we understand the genome because we know the sequence of a linear string of DNA. In fact, all we know is the first dimension out of at least four in which the genome operates (1: the one-dimensional, linear string of letters; 2: the two-dimensional interactions of one part of the string with another, directly or through RNA and protein proxies; 3: the three-dimensional spatial structure of the DNA within the nucleus; and 4: changes to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd dimensions over time). There is a tremendous amount of information packed into that genome that we have not figured out, including multiple simultaneously-overlapping codes.48 When discussing whether or not mutations can create new information, evolutionists routinely bring up an overly-simplistic view of mutation and then claim to have solved the problem while waving their hand over the real issue: the antagonism between ultra-complexity and random mutation. If a four-dimensional genome is hard enough to grasp, there is also a huge amount of "meta-information" in the genome. This is information about the information! This is the information that tells the cell how to maintain the information, how to fix it if it breaks, how to copy it, how to interpret what is there, how to use it, when to use it, and how to pass it on to the next generation. This is all coded in that linear string of letters and life could not exist without it. In fact, life was designed from a top-down perspective, apparently with the meta-information coming first. According to a brilliant paper by Alex Williams,49 for life to exist, organisms require a hierarchy of Perfectly pure, single-molecule-specific biochemistry, specially structured molecules, functionally integrated molecular machines, comprehensively regulated, information-driven metabolic functions, and inversely-causal meta-information. None of these levels can be obtained through natural processes, none can be predicted from the level below, and each is dependent on the level above. Meta-information is the top level of biological complexity and cannot be explained by naturalistic mechanisms, yet life cannot exist without it.50 Putting all other arguments for and against the rise of biological information aside, where did the meta-information, upon which all life depends, come from? As you can see, life is much more complicated than you think. From the hierarchy, listed earlier, it is clear that life could not have arisen by naturalistic means. It's a flat out impossibility. Evolutionists claim to have a lot of evidence that proves their theory. The reality is that it's all an illusion. If you're interested in more about this, here's the link for the full article. http://creation.com... P.S. Something else to ponder. Do you have any idea just how complex a cell is? Here is a short article, along with an eight minute video. I strongly encourage you to watch it. I don't see how anyone can watch it and still believe that biology is a product of random mutation. And even if you don't believe in the Christian God, it is clearly evident that life had a designer. Nothing else fits the facts. Here's that link. Please take a few moments to watch the video. http://ocrampal.com... I don't expect to win this debate. Quite frankly, I believe that debates, especially about religion or evolution, are a joke. There are many more atheists than Theists, and most of them vote the party line, regardless of how well one side or the other debates. I'll be happy if I can just get just one person to think differently about this subject. Thank you. 48) Itzkovitz, S., Hodis, E. and Segal, E., Overlapping codes within protein-coding sequences, Genome Research 20:1582"1589, 2010. 49) Williams, A., Life"s irreducible structure"Part 1: Autopoiesis, Journal of Creation 21(2):109"115, 2007. 50) Williams, A., Meta-information: an impossible conundrum for evolution, 2007.