There is no proof that God exists

Logical proof is a form of proof. Thus, there is proof of God. The Modal Ontological Argument In Christian philosophy, God is commonly adhered to as a maximally great being (of the most perfect being possible)."When they speak of God, people have traditional meant a personal being; The most perfect one possible." [1] “Thus, if the idea of God is the idea of the greatest conceivable or maximally perfect being – it must be the idea of something that is absolutely independent and unlimited. If we are not thinking of an absolutely independent and unlimited being, we are not thinking of God at all.” – P. Dawson [2] Modal Logic In modal logic, we infer that if some entity is possible then this entity is exists in some possible world. To exist in some possible world however, there must also contain no type of contradiction involving this entity [3].Maximally Great Being A maximally great being is a being with all of what we would call great making properties (Omnipotence, Omnibenevolence, Omnipotence ect.). Now, it is self evident that it would be greater to exist in all possible worlds rather than simply just one possible world (3 > 2, 4 > 3 ect.). If another being existed in more worlds than another, then that being would be greater. Thus, if a maximally great being exists in at least one possible world, then necessarily, this being exists in all possible worlds (or else, there would be no way to claim this being was maximally great). [4]The ArgumentLets take a look at the premises of the Ontological Argument to see if the premises follow logically:P1: "It is possible that a maximally great being exists."There is nothing contradictory in the concept of God. P2: "If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists in some possible world."This follows from Modal Logic, as I already explained previously. P3: "If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world."This follows from the very concept of a maximally great being, as I explained previously. P4: "If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world."If there is not a possible world where this being does not exist, then the being must exist in the actual world. This is because our world is possible (if it was impossible, we would not exist). So, since this being exists in everypossible world, the being necessarily exists in the actual world. P5: "If a maximally great being exists in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists."This is self-evident.C: "Therefore, a maximally great being exists."This conclusion follows logically from all the preceding premises, showing that this argument is a logical proof for the existence of a maximally great being. Parodies Some people are under the false impression that this argument can prove anything. For an example, some people think this argument can prove the existence of a maximally great cell phone. However, a cell phone is a contingent but to be maximally great is be necessary. Some may think that it can prove the existence of a maximally great alien, but once again; an extraterrestrial is contingent to nature and we are discussing that which is completely necessary. Conclusion Premise 1 of the Modal Ontological Argument is true, thus the argument logically proves the existence of a maximally great being ("God"). The logic is very simple once you understand it, and most objections to the logic seem to be misunderstandings of it. It seems as if we have logical proof of God. Sources [1] http://www.youtube.com...;[2] https://vle.ucs.org.uk...[3] http://en.wikipedia.org...[4] http://www.doxa.ws...