Evolution Singlehandedly Debunks Christian Mythology

Before I begin I really must complain about the title of this debate. "Evolution singlehandedely debunks Christian mythology. " Once again, Atheists are using a distraction tactic in assuming the very thing they are trying to prove. The pro side argues that evolution is true, And debunks Christianity mythology, While the con side argues that evolution is true, But does not debunk Christianity mythology. No matter which side you argue, It assumes that evolution is true. This is a classic case of moving the goal posts. If you assume that evolution is true, There is essentially no room for debate. Now let's move to the burdens of this round. Because my opponent has made two claims in supporting the resolution, That evolution is true, And evolution debunks Christian mythology, Then it is his job to prove both of them. All I have to do to win this debate is prove that either evolution is false, Or that it is consistent with Christian theology. I will primarily be arguing that evolution is false, But I will also argue that it is consistent with Christian theology. Voters note however, That pro must prove both claims in the resolution for him to win the debate. The truth is, Most of the people that believe in evolution really don't know much about it. Even the people that do believe in it don't believe in it because of the evidence. This is a concept that I will go over later. The more you study evolution, However, You realize that there really isn't any evidence at all. It is common to hear that areas such as the fossil record and structural homology support evolution, But there is a lot of evidence as well from those same areas that contradict evolution. In the end, You will find that at best, Evolution is an unconfirmed hypothesis. If evolution really happened, If for example a cat really did evolve into a tiger, Then in the fossil record we should be finding a series of fossils that represent that transition. These are called transitional forms because they represent a transition from one species to another. Unfortunately, For Darwin, Very few of these were ever found. Even the ones that were found were highly questionable. Consider this, Evolution tries to explain something, Something about the earth's past. But because we don't have anyone who lived 100 million years ago to say it happened, We must look for data that either support or contradict the idea. The best place to look for this data is the fossil record. What does it say? It says evolution never happened. If the most reliable place to look for data about the earth's history says evolution never happened, Scientists simply should not believe in it. The best argument for evolution is probably structural homology and it is the study of similar structures in different species, But it is flawed. For example, Evolutionists will say that because dogs and horses have a lot of similar structures, They must have had a common ancestor. They say the same about a lot of animals. The problem is, Most of these animals have come from quite different evolutionary paths, So there is absolutely no way that they could have had a common ancestor. In addition, The genes that specify those structures are quite different in the species they are comparing, Thus, It confirms the fact that they could not have had a common ancestor. Before I end I would like to point out the biggest problem facing evolutionists today. It is the cambrian explosion and it is something evolutionists simply cannot explain. Another reliable place to look for data about the earth's history is the geologic column. The geologic column is a column of rocks on top of each other and in them contain the species of life we see today. Now from an evolution point of view complex life forms evolved from simple ones. Thus, This is exactly what the geologic column should reflect, And for a while, That's what it looked like. At the bottom, You see simpler life forms such as the triiobites and nautiloids and as you go up they get more and more complex and you see things like horses and dinosaurs. But then something unexpected was found and today it is the biggest problem facing evolutionists today. At the very bottom of the geologic column were found species from every single major phylum in biological classification. This reveals that there was the sudden emergence of all species at once. From a creation point of view, This makes perfect sense. After all, For Christians, We believe God created the world and all of the species in it in 6 days and if this were true, We should be finding all of these species in the very bottom of the geologic column and it is exactly what we found. From an evolution point of view however, It leaves you scratching your head. You see, Evolution believes that every transition from species to species takes millions of years. However, The geologic column reveals the sudden emergence of all species at once. Not only does this not makes sense transition wise, But is also inconsistent with the idea that life started out extremely simple. Scientists have developed crazy phenomenon's to attempt to explain this theory and there are a few things I would like to point out. One, All of the theories attempted to explain the cambrian explosion are only what could have happened against all odds. However, They have no real evidence to back them up. Second, Whenever you are searching for evidence about anything scientific, You should always see where the evidence leads you, Not where you lead it. If you are trying to develop crazy scenarios to make the evidence consistent with evolution, It is likely that anything you come up with will be wrong. It is a much better practice to just see what makes sense according to the evidence. Creationism is a logical conclusion to make from the evidence, Evolution is not. It only makes sense to see where the evidence leads you, Not where you lead it. The evidence points to an intelligent creator, Not evolution.