Jesus must be God.

As this debate draws to a close, I must say I am confident in my points and impressed to see my opponent make it as long as he has. However, I will not lie when I say that I was a bit disappointed with the results of the closing rounds. I did well to anticipate my opponents responses and I was satisfied with the emotion put into this debate. I was disappointed to see the last argument presented. It saddens me to see how my opponent became distraught and lost his calmness being forced to turn to ad hominem remarks, claiming that I was insulting him, and then trying to prove or establish himself at a certain level. I wish to take this time to tell my opponent that I respect him (and his ability to speak languages? ) and that I have enjoyed this debate for the most part. I also would like to say that if my opponent felt it necessary to take a combatant approach to this debate then he did so in vain. I will provide my counter argument (If you will call it that) by making the following statements:(1) My opponent still has not provided a single verse in which Jesus said He was/is not God. (2) My opponent has introduced arguments that either support my very own arguments, or that have already been accounted for in an earlier round. (3) My opponents only attempt to refute my statements are based on the fallacy that I have presented opinion or commentary when in fact I have presented all of my arguments in two simple verses: John 1:1, and John 1:14. Commentary is necessary because of the confusion of this matter especially when one cannot understand such a simple principle. With this being said, the verses my opponent has presented have not contradicted my statements and have not proved that Jesus was not God. As a matter of fact, many verses claim that the LORD is God, and we all know that Jesus is LORD. The evidence for the historical trinity is irrelevant. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sadly, my arguments have yet to be addressed. My opponent has failed to present any arguments, or explanations for any of my evidence. My opponent has only attacked me on two different tracks:(1) Commentary. (2) Ad Hominem or Personal attacks. Because my arguments have not been addressed, I extend them over to the final round. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In conclusion,I have provided evidence that Jesus did say that He was/is God (John 10:30), thus fulfilling my resolution. I have addressed all arguments that have been presented in this debate. My opponent has not provided a verse in which Jesus said He was/is not God. And my opponent has failed to address my arguments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Conclusion of EvidenceI have said that Jesus is God and Man. My opponent has said that Jesus is not God. The resolution is "Jesus Must Be God". I have proved that Jesus said He is God. The only way my opponent has proposed Jesus is/was not God is by saying that Jesus was Man, which is true. So as you can see, my opponent has said that Jesus is not God because He is Man. And I have said that Jesus is God and Man, therefore my opponent has provided evidence to support my own claim. My opponent has also added irrelevant information into this debate as an attempt to distract the readers, so I say, don't be distracted. The answer is clear. Overall, I have enjoyed this debate and hope we can debate in the future. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------P. S. -- I cannot begin to fathom why you felt it necessary to include a piece of the Qu'ran into our debate about Jesus being God, but I would be willing to debate you on the problems with Islam.