Sex

For starters, I would like to point out that my moronic sexaholic of an opponent made an ad hominem attack against me in Round 1. Observe:"my ignorant opponent "AlwaysMoreThanYou" - cheesedingo1I would never have the audacity to make such a rude comment as that. This is clear testimony that sex is bad, because if it was good my opponent wouldn't have to resort to such petty jibes to counter the arguments I haven't made yet.I will address the rest of my opponent's "arguments" in order, then add some uncontendable contentions of my own.Pre-Argument Remarks:Pro writes "My opponent, In his insolence, thinks sex a bad thing. He must be a priest."False. I am Archbishop, not a priest [1]. My opposition to sex has absolutely nothing to do with my deep, buried envy of all the people having sex while I pray alone in the Cathedral meditating on my vows of celibacy and chastity. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, DO YOU HEAR? WHY ARE YOU BRINGING UP THESE ISSUES ANYWAY? I'M NOT ENVIOUS! I DON'T FEEL EMASCULATED!Contention One: It is loved by soooooooo manyThis entire contention is an appeal to popularity therefore it can be rejected fully.Sex DebatesAll these debates prove are that people debated on sexual topics. They say nothing about the popularity of sex.There are jobs about sexSo what? There are also jobs about garbage collection and disposal, but I don't really think that would qualify garbage as "loved by soooooooo many".There are movies about sexTurn. This is all a giant conspiracy by the Jews who control Hollywood and the media [2][3][4][5]. They're trying to take over the world by tricking us into having sex, because sex is bad. The high attendance at these movies are merely proof that they are succeeding in their deception.Sex is in our earsCross-apply my irrefutable point about the Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world by making us think sex is good.It's what SELLSAgain, cross-apply my point about the Jewish conspiracy. It is undeniable from all the evidence that my opponent posts that we are being deceived by a Zionist conspiracy to embrace sex, which is actually evil.In conclusion, not only is this entire contention an appeal to popularity, but it clearly showcases the brainwashing of the public by Jews. Since we all know you wouldn't brainwash someone into thinking that something good is good, we can infer that sex is bad and we're just being manipulated into thinking it's good.Wait, did I say "we"? I mean, "you're just being manipulated". I'm not. I'm above this.Contention Two: It feels goodTurn. Anything that feels good is bad for you (obviously). When was the last time you ate a a garden full of brussel sprouts? If you're sane, the answer will be "never". When was the last time you ate something sweet and unhealthy? Unless you're some kind of saint, probably quite recently. Things that taste good are bad for you. Things that taste bad are good for you. This applies to everything.I think it would feel good to tie my opponent to his bed and... yeah, I'll leave that to your imagination.Point: Everything that feels good is bad, and everything that feels bad is good.You can easily notice this by seeing how guilty and bad people feel after sex is over [6][7]. That's because they knew it was bad, just like you (yes, you) know that eating that entire box of donuts yesterday was bad. It just felt too good for them (and you) to resist.Contention Three: Even the Church is good with sexNo, it's not, and my opponent obviously does not understand the Church. The Church's infallible Magisterium is composed of old virgin men, it's common sense that they're not good with sex. Throughout the years, they've been steadily outlawing more and more forms of sex, and eventually it will get to the point where they outlaw all sex.God obviously does not like humans, or else He wouldn't have made the world so hostile to human life. His eventual goal is clearly to make us extinct, so the only way we can please Him is by helping ourselves die out.Sex is never good. Sex is always bad.Counter-Contention One: Jewish conspiracyI've already touched quite heavily on this in my thorough refutation of Pro's Contention One. There is a clear Jewish conspiracy to make us love sex. Conspiracies are bad. You don't conspire to make someone like something that's good for them, so obviously this is typical media treachery trying to brainwash us into sexbots, which will then be sold to aliens on Mars [8].Counter-Contention Two: Natural LawIt is quite clear that existence entails suffering. There is no human on earth who has not suffered in some minor form. Therefore, I hold that causing people to exist is immoral because it increases the total amount of suffering.Sex causes people to exist, therefore it is immoral. Also, it feels good which means it's bad. In the form of a syllogism:Premise One: Existence entails sufferingPremise Two: Causing needless suffering is immoralPremise Three: Sex causes existenceConclusion: Sex is immoralCounter-Contention Three: DivisionSex causes so much division. Sex causes drama. Causing division and drama are prima facie immoral, so sex is immoral too, because it causes division and drama.We need only look at the recent case of Amanda Todd. Amanda Todd. Sex. Think about it.Also, you have people like me. I suffer great mental anguish because of sex. If sex didn't exist, I wouldn't have to grip my rosary so tightly that it bites into my flesh and mutter Latin prayers to prevent sinful thoughts entering my mind every time I think of cheesedingo1.Conclusion:I have clearly refuted all my opponent's fallacious points, as well as drawing up three irrefutable contentions.Sources:1. http://debate.org...2. http://rense.com...3. http://rense.com...4. http://iamthewitness.com...5. http://www.stormfront.org...6. http://www.tressugar.com...7. http://www.nytimes.com...8. http://www.dailymail.co.uk...