Christianity is an illegitimate religion

I will comply to my opponent's wishes and keep my paragraphs short.A) Adam and EveThere are two flaws in my opponent's refutal"One man does not have the education that a whole council of scientists have."- This statement is subject to opinion; assumptions will not be considered evidence.- Secondly, Pro has not provided any sources, therefore we can consider this argument invalid.B) I believe we have resolved this issue. Moving on.C) Noah’s ArkAgain, two flaws."This theory could just be a ship that was washed up there at a time before."- If Pro is willing to believe this, one might ask what makes Noah's Ark so far-fetched. Not to mention this "boat-like structure" was discovered on a mountain top in Turkey. It would be perfectly logical to assume, based off of evidence, that this "boat" only arrived upon this mountain top due to a rise of water. But how could water cover a mountain? Simple, it was the waters of the Great Flood.- Pro cannot criticize my sources, as he has not provided any of his own. Secondly, I might mention that there is no such thing as a non-bias source; everyone is bias towards something, such is the nature of this debate.D) The Bible- written by men?- My opponent has brought up an excellent point. The entire Bible was written by approximately 40 men of diverse backgrounds over the course of 1500 years[1]- The Bible is believed to be the inspired, inherent Word of God; Christians believe this to be a flawless record of God's many revelations with humanity. In this debate, my opponent and I believe in the existence of a powerful, omnipotent God. How then would it be illogical to conclude that God is powerful enough to reveal his Truth to the people through the people?E) PropheciesAgain, my opponent criticizes my source, it would be understandable if he provided "non-biased" sources of his own."How do you know these prophecies were not completed by Jesus..."- We can logically assume Jesus fulfilled every prophecy about him. If Jesus did not fulfill the prophecies of the old testament, Christianity would simply not exist today. Mainly, because his disciples witnessed every one of his miracles. If his disciples did not witness his miracles, they probably wouldn't have died for their beliefs."And these prophecies could be made by propagandizers of Christianity when the Church became corrupt!"- Possible, but not probable. A further criticism concerns whether the copies we possess are credible. Since we do not possess the originals, people ask, how can we be sure they are identical to them? The initial answer is that we will never be completely certain, for there is no means at our disposal to reproduce the originals. This has always been a problem with all known ancient documents. Yet this same question is rarely asked of other historical manuscripts which we refer to constantly[2]. I would advise my opponent to further investigate source 2, as it would forfeit his previous quote.F) The virgin birth"As for a baby being born to a virgin... No prophecy can explain that. There are scientific facts against that, you cannot deny this fallacy."- Under no circumstances can God's actions be justified through science. If my opponent believes in God, it wouldn't be so far-fetched as to believe him powerful enough to bend the very laws that he created. Secondly, one must assume there was a significant importance of the messiah being born of a virgin.I have refuted all of my opponent's refutations for this round. In round two, I stated that I would cover my opponent's contentions, 1 and 2 in this round. However, I find it unnecessary as of now, considering this debate is slowly coming to a close. Nonetheless, if Pro would rather me present the topics in the final round, so be it. Onto Pro.[1] http://www.gotquestions.org...[2] http://debate.org.uk...