Human Beings Evolved

But do realize this debate will be a forever type debate. Meaning they probably no way both sides could actually win this. But as for you and me i guess it's who could bring their best stuff to the big table. So, let's get started shall we. .. Oh wait a minute. Wait one darn second. Did i hear what i through i heard? I think i did. You say you don't want to bring religion in to this. We'll why the heck should i debate then if i can't bring religion in to this, because that goes right in to my Creation argument. Well thank you Ms. Emilrose, and thank you who ever reading this. Well this was a very short debate. .. .. . Naw, really. .. .. It's over. .. .. .. .. .. it's really is over. .. .. .. .. . Wait. .. Wait. .. .. .. I think i'm still breathing. Yeah, that's right. The higher power give me a working brain to work with. So, with the power invested in him i will go on in this debate. .. .. You challenge me, so i must go on. .. .. Okay, before i really begin. I want to go over something. Human evolution is a theory, not a absolute truth. So, before i begin i have a video here to share with you. There is three main key factor in this clip. 1. We still aren't really sure why we walk on two legs, why we don't have fur, and where our big brains come from. 2. Very little is known, for example, about why humans became bipedal. 3. Why humans continued to evolve when our fellow hominids became extinct. Here is the link: Highly encourage you to watch. it's only 3 minutes and 20 seconds. I will give a brief description on Creation. Scientific study of the origin of life on earth" cannot go back in time and trace the first life on the earth given present technology. "Creator Himself, who does not and cannot lie. Genesis 1"2 provides an accurate eyewitness account of the beginning of all things, according to God". (1. ) . https://answersingenesis.org... "Scientists can attempt to estimate the age of the universe, the age of the earth, or the age of a rock, but they cannot directly measure the age". (2. ) . https://answersingenesis.org... The second subject i will accept to go though is The Second Law of Thermodynamics. "A biological evolution that converts bacteria into humans, with an obvious increase of order and complexity, would violate the Second Law which says "things become more disordered through time, not more complex, as evolution insists. (3. ) . http://www.asa3.org... This is obviously wrong to go by this. "The Second Law of Thermodynamics is not violated by either mutation or natural selection, which are the major actions in neo-Darwinian evolution. If an overall process of evolution is split into many small steps involving mutation followed by selection, each step is permitted by the Second Law, and so is the overall process". (4. ) . http://www.asa3.org... Human evolution, just isn't clear enough and not enough dated to go forward with this theory. They the scientist, can't accurately predict when or where we came from. They could estimate on the age. But they are always off with they numbers, first they say dot, dot, dot. Then totally change things around. At least the Bible, don't change. Plus the bible is the only written document, and the oldest that state where we actually came from. Science have yet to accurately say where we came from. Why evolution not happening. What we see right now, of course, is an array of distinct kinds of plants and animals with many varieties within each kind, but with very clear and -- apparently -- unbridgeable gaps between the kinds. That is, for example, there are many varieties of dogs and many varieties of cats, but no "dats" or "cogs. " Such variation is often called microevolution, and these minor horizontal (or downward) changes occur fairly often, but such changes are not true "vertical" evolution. Human evolution is just a theory. It has been for the last 50 years and it will remain a theory for the next 200 years or more. Looking forward to what Emilrose have cooking up next. .. .. Your turn. .. .. .. .. .. ..