There is no evidence that a god exists

Have had to type up this round very quickly, hope it all makes sense! I thank con for the points made, but con has failed to prove God, I will show why;CondratictionCon asserts that God can work within the laws of physics. The only way to show this is if he provides physical evidence of God.Something From NothingCon asserts "According to current Quantum Theory something can come from nothing. The explanation of why that happens has not yet been formed so the earlier statement by Pro should no be considered relevant."We do not need to explain why grass grows in order to accept that it does. We have observed it growing, therefore if we argue that grass does not grow, the observation would be perfectly valid. Just like, we may not yet know why something comes from nothing, but we have observed it, therefor in an argument of wether something can come from nothing, it is perfectly valid. Also, In Cons opening round, his entire argument bases around the fact that something CANNOT come from nothing. In round 2 he has admitted that somethng CAN come from nothing. We both agree that something can come from nothing, especially within the confines of quantum physics. If something can come from nothing, Cons argument fails.EvilCon asserts that evil must exist for free will. I would put forward that with an all knowing and all powerful God, fre will would just be an illusion. God would be all powerful, therefore he could create any any world that owuld have any possible outcome. He is all knowing, so he knows every outcome of every world he may create. Therefore, he can create a world withought death, rape, famine, slavery or negativety. Saying that they are there because of freewill just means he allowed it to be there in his chosen creation.Also, you would say free will is the choices you are allowed to make, you could turn left, or you could turn right, for example. But, in Gods chosen creation, out of every other possibility that ever could be concieved, he chose to create the one in which you turn whatever way you do, he knew that you would do that when he created everything, and therefore you havent made the choice now, you are simply acting that choice out. All the choices, ever, would have been made when God choose to create the world where you make those specific choices. Therefore, God cannot be all good, because he choose not to create an all good world, he chose to create ones where children suffer, rapists walk free and bad things happen. If God is not all good, Cond definition of God does not exist.The Natural StateCon misunderstands my argument here. this argument states that nothing to something is completely natural. With or withought a God, you would have nothing to something, as we both agree on above. Cons argument asumes that the natural state is something to something and therefore you need god to be involved that to change. My argument of natural state refutes this, proves that you dont need a god for nothing to produce something, and therefore his argument of such based on natural state asumptions are invalid. Cons point of "god is outside of physics." actually has nothing to do with this paragraph and changes it in no way, since the evidence that he points to of God, could happen without a God, naturally. Therefore, this still stands.Cons conclusion Con asserts "since quantum physics will fail to find a way to make something from nothing", the only way he can make this claim is if he can travel through time or tell the future. Asserting the old "therefore, God" answer is not proof.There are many things both religios people and scientists thought they would never find or manage, for example, in the 1700's can you imagine anyone believing me if I went back and told them "By the way, I can create fire from a box(lighter), put people in a box(tv), tell someone on the other side of the planet something in under a second(internet) and control things like magic (wireless). No, but that doesn't mean we didnt manage.Just because we dont fully understand things now, doesn't mean science never will. Lack of knowledge doesnt mean you can insert God to fill the gaps, just means we need more study.