Bestiality should be illegal in all cases in the United States

Dude, there've been times in this debate where you completely misunderstood what I've said. For instance, I did not say that monkeys could consent. I said that as intelligent as they are, they still cannot consent because they cannot be made aware of the risks involved with sexual activity between humans and animals, and thus they cannot make an intelligent decision on whether they should or shouldn't do it. As for aliens, I didn't say that proof of their existence would mean that you won. I said that your point couldn't even be considered until alien life was proven. Also, that they "probably" exist isn't good enough. I wasn't talking about people raping chimps. In any sexual situation between a human and an ape, if the ape grabs the human's shoulders for some reason, *snap* it'd rip the unfortunate guy or girl's shoulder's off. Then again, I suppose he'd be asking for it. As for the Biblical reference, I said that you could ignore that point if you weren't a Christian. However, I am also against homosexuality, just so that you know, and I recently did a splendid debate with Luckystars on this subject. Having cleared up these things, I will finish off my turn in this Round. Okay, I concede that PERHAPS (and that's a big perhaps I think) you will not contract a sexually transmitted disease from an animal upon engaging in a sexual activity with it. However, not much research has been done on the subject of bestiality and Zoophilia, because the scientific community is yet to be motivated to make arguments supporting it and deeming it normal. Most likely there are biological repercussions of this activity that we do not know about. HOWEVER, humans got AIDS from monkeys. That's one STD that can be transmitted from species to species. As for point number three, I suppose it would lower the risk. But what happens if your animal has one? Are you just going to give it away? This process sounds inhumane, inhumane and expensive. As for point number four, that's like saying that smoking's fine because you can get lung cancer even without smoking. Of course, I'm not saying that smoking should be illegal. Even if I were to say this, it'd be a subject for an entirely different debate. As for point number five, how do they know that there are no microfractures? Do they examine each one of those thingies under a microscope before they put it in a box? As for my dogs, they were all outside, except for one that my family had when I was about four or five. My cat has been indoors, but pretty much all she's ever done is rub her head against my stomach. Then again, she is neutered. But like I said, would not thousands of disgusted owners be getting rid of their animals were this the case? As for point number two in "Humans have no right to do this to animals. " perhaps the laws on animal cruelty should be changed, as well as the laws on bestiality. But like I said, if you give your dog AIDS through sexual intercourse, it's gonna suffer from it. and you should be held responsible. Then, under "Utilitarianism. " my opponent questions laws that we cannot enforce. It is impossible to enforce every law out there. but we don't throw them out. We have immigration laws, even though probably thousands of Mexicans jump the border fence every day. Also, drug laws are not exclusively targeting black males. I'm white, and if I got caught using cocaine, I'd be whisked off to jail just as fast as a black man would. Likewise, if you're black and you have no drugs in your car when the cops search you, you have nothing to worry about. If 10% of the population is criminal, it's not necessarily the court's fault; why can't it be 10% of the population's fault? If 50% of the population consisted of child rapists, would you let them all go because it'd be too expensive to lock them up?