Certain arcade games are too close to gambling (full res. in debate)

Thank you for debating with me. I'm going to start by simply listing some of the arcade games that should be banned, and explaining why. Proving that even one of these games should count as gambling is enough to remain true to the resolution. I will base my arguments primarily off of my definition, although many of these games should be banned even according to yours. By the way, I should note that my definition comes from here: http://www.thefreedictionary.com... Stacker: The arcade game Stacker is probably the one I'm most against. You can read about what it is here: http://en.wikipedia.org...(game) Basically, Stacker is a glass box full of expensive prizes such as X-Boxes and iPods. After inserting money ($1 usually), the goal is to press the button at the right moment to stack blocks that are moving back and forth across the screen. If you stack the blocks all the way to the top, you win an X-Box. Stacker is gambling simply because you're paying money in hopes of winning a much bigger prize. It also is usually rigged so that only 1 in 800 people will win, making it a game of chance. The above video shows the top block skipping over because the player wasn't the 800th player. http://www.youtube.com... Even when it's not rigged, the blocks are moving so fast that winning will require some luck combined with skill. American Idol Superstar: American Idol Superstar is almost exactly the same as Stacker; gameplay is just slightly different. Interestingly, this game seller even claims it's "addicting." http://www.monkeysarcades.com... Ticket Redemption Games: Many ticket redemption games are clearly luck-based and designed to be addictive, just like gambling. Just take a look inside an arcade. You'll see hundreds of spinning wheels and other devices that you place a token in, and hope that the token rolls into/through something at the right second. If this happens, you win a jackpot of tickets. Some machines even go as far as giving you a chance to win more tokens. These games are clearly designed to be addictive by luring players with a large ticket prize, and the appearance of being easy to win. They have the same structure as many casino games. These games fit under the definition of gambling since you are both betting on an uncertain outcome, and are playing a game of chance for stakes (tickets). All Aboard: This one is quite possibly one of the most convincing so far. Here's a video showing how it works: http://www.youtuberepeat.com... Without the innocent train appearance, this is obviously a copy of a slot machine, but you win tickets instead of money. It is still stakes though, so this is of course gambling. Tokens: Arcades can currently get away with gambling through the use of tokens. Since money is technically not being used directly, they can basically put any machine into an arcade. If they wanted to, they could even install token modified slot machines and get away with it. If these arcade games were switched so that you insert money for a chance to win money, the fact that they're gambling would be obvious. Instead, they are disguised as harmless children's games. Like casino gambling, they are designed to addict them (at least temporarily) and make them waste as much money as they have trying to get the jackpot. This is wrong, and is actually the same reason why many adults are addicted to gambling. I should make it clear that I'm not against all arcade games. Many ticket redemption games are skill based, such as ski-ball and hoop-shooting games, and I'm fine with these. It is scam games like Stacker and games of chance that I am against. I have run out of room, so I am done for now. I look forward to my opponent's arguments.