Frozen is a bad movie.

Con made some good arguments and points, but reading over her round, I saw a lot of material that would go to support my opinion. The Characters (2): Con says Anna can "act before she thinks". That just goes to support the point I made when I said that Anna falls in love with that creepy prince in one night. She acts before she thinks! She doesn't think of the irrationality of the situation, but goes ahead and falls in love anyway! What kind of morals are we teaching the youth of America with this scenario? That it is perfectly fine and acceptable to fall and love and make plans for your future with somebody after not even a full day with them? It is flawed in so many ways, I could write my entire debate just on this one idea.Con then goes on to describe Elsa, "Elsa looks poised, regal and reserved, but in reality, she lives in fear as she wrestles with a mighty secret". While I won't deny the truth of that statement, it is only true at the beginning of the movie. She then throws it out the window when she runs away and freezes the entire country. I'm still not sure why she did that, considering she loves and cares for the people she is freezing. She is extremely weak as she doesn't face her fears, instead running away and leaving misery and destruction behind her. Con brings up Olaf, saying he likes warm hugs and that he is by far the friendliest snowman to walk the mountains above Arendelle. I don't deny any of that, again, but possibly the biggest reason behind my dislike for him is the fact that he has absolutely no character development. We see him at the very beginning, lifeless and then only for about a second. Halfway through the movie he pops out of nowhere and we are supposed to act like this is the moment we've been waiting for all along. He sings an absolute BS song about summer, considering how it is unlikely he even knows what summer is, and even if he does, why would a snowman want to experience summer? That's a death sentence, the equivalent of a human wanting to visit the sun. I mean, come on, we are watching a snowman with an apparent suicide wish. I am going to skip Con's description of Kristoff, as I simply don't have the inclination or character count remainder to waste on him. I will skip Hans as well.Now I will go over Con's rebuttals: 1. Con discusses how Elsa was protecting Anna by secluding herself because she loves Anna. Well, if she loves Anna so much, why does she freeze everything as soon as she leaves and seemingly doesn't care about unfreezing the land until random stuff happens. 2. Con talks about how many Disney movies involves love at first sight. She argues how since many of them have it, it somehow pardons this movie from including it. Honey, just because lots of people do something doesn't mean it's right. That's like saying that since many people do illegal things it is perfectly fine to participate in such activities. This movie is essentially telling our youth that falling in love is so trivial as for it to happen in less than a day. And by arguably the main character as well! And I think Con might have been a little confused by who I was talking about here in the last round... I was referring to that one prince who turns out to be the villain, I think? I really don't know who Hans is supposed to be in the movie, honestly. 3. Con spends some time on the topic I brought up in my last round: My opinion that there is no real villain in Frozen, of if there is, he/she/it is just entirely ridiculous. Con seems to recognize Hans as the main villain and then goes on to attempt to explain why he is a good villain. See, the way I look at it is, villains are always better when they have special powers or at least some special ability. At least, physical or mental strength. Hans has none of these, and it shows when he gets thrown into the sea. Con also thinks that since Frozen doesn't have a typical villain, it makes it's off-color villain all the more memorable. But come on folks, when have you ever heard anybody or anything talk about Hans? He might be the most unmemorable Disney villain of all time, actually. It's villains like Robert Callaghan, Lotso, Ursula and even King Candy that we remember as being the coolest villains around. Hans is the least entitled to be titled memorable. Heck, I barely remembered him the next morning while I was reminiscing the movie. Going back to an argument I brought up in the last round, he can't even kill somebody! Instead he leaves his victim, Anna, locked up in a room, where of course some random person is going to let her loose. Any sensible villain would get the job done, but no, he just has to spare Anna's life so he will lose at the end of the movie. Now, if Hans had won, and put Anna, Elsa, Kristoff and Olaf in torture cells, I would've rated this a 10/10. That's the kind of ending Disney movies need. Ok, not exactly, but anything would be better than the ending they give us, with Elsa kissing Anna in a scene that probably sparked an extra 25% of young girls becoming lesbian. To this day I'm worried my sister will grow up to be like Elsa. I think I've covered enough ground for this round. In the next round I will thoroughly discuss the second half of Con's last round. Thank you.