Christians break Gods first commandment by believing that Jesus is God.

In my previous post I made the point that Jesus is not God therefore supporting my main argument that Christians are breaking the first commandment by believing that he is. I did so by offering two points which I backed up with Biblical evidence. 1. The Bible states that no one has ever seen God. 2. The Bible states that God cannot be a man. So far throughout our debate you have only provided a counter argument to point 1. 'The Bible states that no one has ever seen God' with supporting Biblical evidence. According to your explanation of this Biblical evidence, only 'G-d's anointed prophets' can see God. Now this may dispel my literal interpretation of the Bible verses that I gave in support of point 1. but it does nothing to counter my main argument nor my supporting arguments that Jesus is not God. Allow me to restate the two points I made in the previous round taking your contribution into account. 1. The Bible states that 'only Gods anointed prophets' have ever seen God. 2. The Bible states that God cannot be a man. I have taken your contribution onboard and implemented it into my above two points. Following this amendment these points remain consistent in proving that Jesus is not God because according to you only Gods anointed prophets have ever seen God. Was it only possible for Gods anointed prophets to see Jesus? No, of course not. Your 'substantial preliminary explanation as to how and why terms are used as they are used' is worthless and meaningless if it does not offer a counter argument to what we are debating. As you can see so far you have failed miserably to offer any counter argument to the main topic of debate whatsoever. If you want to debate me then please at the very least pay attention and read what I have written. At no point did I ever state what you accuse me of. '...which oddly enough my opponent is quoting despite his assertion that Yeshua ben Yosef is NOT The Messiah.' Nonsense! I did not write any such thing. I wrote that the prophesied messiah was never expected to be God. 2 Samuel 7 does not state that the prophesied messiah will be God, it states that he will be God's son. I previously demonstrated with Biblical evidence that being Gods son does not make you God. I refer you back to point 2 mentioned above, God cannot be a man. We have only two rounds remaining. Thus far you have given no counter argument to the fact that Christians break Gods first commandment by believing that Jesus is God. Let me try and simplify this for you so that this entire debate does not end up being a complete waste of time. You state that Jesus (Yeshua ben Yosef) is God's son. I agree with you. The Bible makes it clear that he is. The Bible does not state anywhere that being God's son is the same as being God. So now you need to provide Biblical evidence that the Bible does state that being God's son is the same as being God. You state that Jesus (Yeshua ben Yosef) is the prophesied messiah. I agree with you. The Bible makes it clear that he is. The Bible does not state anywhere that the prophesied messiah will be God. So now you need to provide Biblical evidence that the Bible does state that the prophesied messiah will be God. I assume that we are in agreement that Jesus (Yeshua ben Yosef) was a man so you must also acknowledge the Biblical evidence that I submitted clearly stating that God cannot be a man.