Should we eat death row prisoners as meat

Prisoners who are executed are abominations to society, but the family is not responsible for what they have done so they have a right to bury them. In a regular graveyard, there are just bodies, it doesn't matter whether they are good or bad people, they are just corpses. If he is your father, and he claims his innocence and then he is eaten how would you feel then? He could be wrongly convicted. The ground already eats people up, we don't need to get involved in that. After a human being is executed, whether or not you like it, they were someone so they should be able to get a proper burial. What does eating them do? Eating someone does not do anything, therefore there is absolutely no point in eating them. They have faced the hardest punishment, what good would punishing them after they have died do? There is a huge difference between eating another humans flesh and eating an animals. Humans are humans, they walk, talk, and are somehow associated with our society. Animals on the other hand, are needed to provide the proper amount of protein. Human flesh has little to none, seeing as there isn't much meat on the bones. Eating regular meat is fine, it prevents things like diabetes and helps muscle growth. As they have proven, eating human flesh is addictive, but most people who go through withdraw from regular meat are going through it because they have a sudden lack of protein. That is the key difference: Human Flesh is totally unneeded l, whereas regular meat eaters go through a lack of protein withdraw. Let me ask you this, would you eat human flesh? Your answer is probably No , right? Chickens are not human beings. They can not think for themselves and probably aren't even aware that they exist. Just think about it, you can play the "why" game all you want, but pigs, cows, chickens, etc have been eaten since the dawn of time, but even way back when, cannibalism was still frowned upon. It isn't my fault that people are starving in Congo, how is that even relevant? Eating meat can caused diseases if it is processed, but regular meat is fine. The key is moderation. You are going way off topic and seem to be discussing whether or not we should eat meat rather than should we eat dead prisoners. I never said humans don't know what they should or shouldn't do. I said cannibal's brains have an urge for human flesh, they are insane, not everyone. Like I said earlier, there is a big difference between a wild animal and a executed prisoner. A heard of wild Buffalo will kill you in the wild, so by your logic they are useless to society. This is a moral question, we don't eat humans because they are humans, and in a way wouldn't that like be killing them twice? Humans are humans, wild animals are wild. You're really just starting to repeat what you have said multiple times already, which I have answered. Prisoners are still humans, wild animals are not. Wild animals will try to kill you in an instant, just like a prisoner would. You wouldn't eat a human, but you would eat meat so don't be a hypocrite. We are the most superior species, we aren't living in the jungle anymore and are far more intelligent than other animals. Can most animals cook and clean or think for themselves? No. You do realize that most of the global warming is caused by the warming of the Earth right? No us. Animals make other animals go extinct too, it isn't just us. You are WAY off topic again. Let me ask you this, if a car was speeding down a road and you had to save a dog or a child, who would you save? The child of course. Humans have more of a bond than animals. Eating animals has always been normal, eating humans has never been normal. I never said eating human flesh could make you sick, it is a physiological issue. You are talking about something totally different, there is no need to eat an executed prisoner. If they are in a jail, everyone else most likely has food. Being stranded on a mountain and eating someone is still disgusting, do you think they wanted to eat them? Eating a human regardless of what they have done is sick. You are no better than a killer if you eat their dead body. The Pro has claimed I have offered no valid reasons, but the physiological aspect is very important. You wouldn't want to encourage a mental illness would you? You have not proved anything, you have merely attempted to explain why humans and animals are equal. Humans are more important than animal life because we have evolved more. All animals think that their kind are the most important. Pro has failed to provide any valid reasons and their argument went way off topic. They have discussed why we shouldn't eat animals, nothing to do with whether or not we should eat dead prisoners. From these reasons vote Con. http://breakingmuscle.com... http://www.nutrientrich.com... https://liveto110.com...