Abiogenesis Is Sound

I will first go over my own case, and then I shall move onto my opponents. 1. Archea are the simplest form of life on earth, largely thought to be the bridge between the first bacteria and modern bacteria. The absolute simplest of these bacteria is the nanoarcheum equitans, whose DNA contains 537 protein encoding genes. Source - http://www.pnas.org... 2. For reference, the average yeast protein is 466 amino acids long. That's par for the course in protein size. Source - Lodish H, Berk A, Matsudaira P, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Scott MP, Zipurksy SL, Darnell J (2004). Molecular Cell Biology (5th ed.). New York, New York: WH Freeman and Company. 3. There are a total of 25 unique amino acids related to the 64 codons. Source - https://en.wikipedia.org... 4. The enzyme Aminoacyl tRNA synthetase needs to exist in order for cell production to take place. Source - https://en.wikipedia.org... 5. To create even the simplest form of life on the planet today, assuming that yeast proteins are of average size, would take 527 unique proteins of 466 amino acids in length means that (527 x 466) 245,582 amino acids would have to end up in the right order, which, with a total of 25 unique amino acids, means that roughly 1 out of 25 reactions would occur that didn't restart the entire progress. Statistically speaking, that means the chances of abiogenesis would occur properly 1 out of 25 to the 245,582nd power, or, as my calculator puts it, error times. In addition to this, for this lifeform to live for any amount of time would require Aminoacyl tRNA synthetase to reproduce its proteins, otherwise it would eventually stop supporting itself. Source - Analysis of prior data Opponent's Case: There are two problems with my opponents case. First, the definition of life, which should be "the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death" (Oxford Dictionary). Secondarily, under their explanation of abiogenesis, the change from RNA network to cell(s). As has been already discussed, the chances of a cell forming on its own are microscopic in scale. However, for the sake of argument, and for argument's sake alone, I will accept that a single cell could have possibly formed in an unstable environment that would constantly be breaking the bonds between acids due to frequent moving and bombardment by UV radiation. However, there can only be one cell. Any more would require a miracle, which no longer falls under the category of abiogenesis. So, we have our one cell. Unfortunately, the process by which a cell reproduces, reproduction being necessary to define life, is dictated by a complex, and I mean very complex, series of chemical signals, that have been refined over billions of years of evolution, that involve literally ripping the cell into two pieces and equally dividing the various organelles. Our protocell didn't have these years. There is, in fact, no guarantee that this protocell even had the capacity to reproduce without outside stimuli. Therefore, because the ability to reproduce is necessary to the definition of life, we must conclude that this protocell can't be defined as life, and therefore, abiogenesis, as my opponent has proposed, does not actually lead to life, or a sustainable fascimile of life. I await the reply from my opponent. Sidenote If the information found upon wikipedia isn't found satisfactory, than I shall find a source that is. However, I do believe that wikipedia is mostly reliable in this area, therefore I will require it as the bare minimum for the two of us.