If colin leslie dean debating his book is SPAM then so is JK Rowling' debating her new book SPAM

Dear readers of the debate, my opponent generally is not understanding the train of thought that is put into my arguments. I did not move the goalpost nor did I change any definitions. My opponent is taking a single sentence out of my entire debate and acting as it was my only argument. If we are to ignore the massive walls of text that my opponent has not addressed at all and focus on that one insignificant point. Let me explain as simply as I can the logic behind that sentence. 1A : SPAM is according to definition irrelevant or unsolicited. 2A: DDO is a debating website 3A : Thus, Debates are relevant 4A: Debates have to have a topic that is discussable in order to be of any value. 5A : Thus, we deduct from 3A that only discussable topics are relevant. 6A: 1A thus tells us that discussable topics are not spam. 1B : Rowling is a famed author 2B : Rowling has a vivid, popular collection of work that has a wast world associated. 3B : Said work is already discussed widely on DDO without her own intervention. 4B : hence, her work is discussable 5B : as concluded in 6A discussable topics are not spam and thus Rowling would not be spamming. 1C : Dean is not a famed author 2C: Dean does not have a vivid, popular collection of work that has a wast world associated 3C: Said work is not discussed at all on DDO without his intervention, as showed. 4C: hence, his work is not discussable 5C: If it is not discussable it is not relevant as a debate and thus is spam. If we move on with the same train on the topic of self promotion 1D : Rowling is a famed author 2D : Rowling has a vivid, popular collection of work that has a wast world associated. 4D : If Rowling would come here she would already be known, and as such her work would not need to be promoted. 5D : If it does not need to be promoted she can always leave out the link to said work 6D: since 2D she can still debate someone without advertising the work as shown by 5D 7D: 6D shows us that Rowling can debate her book here without needing to promote it herself. 1E: Dean is not a famed author 2E : Dean does not have a vivid, popular collection of work that has a wast world associated. 4E : If Dean would come here he would not be known and would need to promote his work in order for anyone to be able to discuss it. 5E : If it does need to be promoted he can never leave out the link to said work 6E: since 2E he can not debate someone without advertising the work as shown by 5E 7E: 6E shows us that Dean can not debate his book here without needing to promote it himself This is the main ground for this entire debate, this logical train that shows us the difference between Dean and Rowling, and why it isn't moving the goalpost. here you have a perfectly logical path between spam and discussability: The entire case against pro summed up to under 5 seven line statement deductions: 30 statements all in all. And yet my opponent did not provide us with a single reason why this argument was incorrect: I had to strip it down to it's bare core in order for my opponent to hopefully see how it relates and how it isn't moving the goalpost the slightest. My opponent is also fixated that Rowling would come here to advertise, while I've shown that it is perfectly logical if she would only come here to debate her work, she wouldn't need to advertise. the resolution said nothing on self promotion and yet my opponent tried to defend that mute point without realizing that it wasn't even fully related to the debate, only that one quote that started the debate. as stated and stated again: Dean is not a leading poet, it is doubtful he is even a known poet at all. I wonder if anyone still remembers him at the platforms he used to promote himself on before he came to DDO, and I wonder how long he'll be remembered once for some reason he stops visiting this site. DDo will forget him fairly quickly, and with all due respect to Dean, it might just have to be that way until he realizes what it does take to become a great author and poet, and how important it is to actually listen to what others have to say instead of just blurring it out.