Deontology (pro) v. Utilitarianism (con)

I'm still willing to try new things! Now before I begin, I feel the need to define somethings, and those things being my topic of defense, and the word Philosophy. Deontological Ethics - Action is considered morally good because of some characteristic of the action itself, not because the product of the action is goodPhilosophy - The study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered as an academic disciplineMoral - Concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character1. Sometimes, "The Principle of Utility" is not the best Policy. Utiliatianism, is the worst policy for a moral code. The belief in if it benefits a majority instead of just one or a few, is just an aweful system. Utiliatianism is something that tries to solve the problems of the majority and the less fortunate, without even knowing whom is the less fortunate. Causing for a loss in funds in such that could be used for other things to benefit people. Now this is opinion, but, a great example to me of Utiliatianism would be the book, "The Giver. " In it we see them have perfect utopia surrounded on helping the majority, and making an unselfish world. While in theory this is great, the problem is well the Theory! We are humans, a species that each person has their own traits and features, we cannot force upon a majority in order to get them be happy. It only leads to more chaos then there was before. The main problem of coarse as Dr. Micheal W. Austin put it is, "Utilitarianism's primary weakness has to do with justice. A standard objection to utilitarianism is that it could require us to violate the standards of justice. For example, imagine that you're a judge in a small town. Someone has commited a crime, and there has been some social unrest resulting in violence. As the judge, you know if you sentence an innocent man to death, the town will be calmed and peace restored. If you set him free, even more unrest will erupt, with more harm coming to town. Utilitarianism seems to require punishing the innocent in certain circumstances such as these. "As you can see, Dr. Micheal makes a valid point, proving that if needed taking the Civil Rights of a few is "better" for all. Utilitarianism cannot work for that very reason, if only a few can be happy then so be it, but if taking the civil rights of a few away to allow the rest to be happy. Then we are allowing for death and destruction in a different form.2. Deontology is the Best PolicyDeontology is the best policy for a moral code, it believes that if the action obeys moral code and is good, then it shall be good. Meaning if I decided to share a banana with Bessy Lou because she doesn't have a snack, I'm completing a good action, and therefore, a good outcome. By sharing that banana, I have shown that I have compassion and care, and believe my actions speak louder then words. The great thing as well about Deontology is overall, its goals(unlike Utilitarianism), is not to benefit the majority, but to protect the few. Now when I mean "Protect the Few," I mean protecting there rights. Instead of judging the innocent man, Deontology instead looks and make sure this is morally right. Which in turn protects and even though it doesn't satisfy the majority, it satisfies the few. As I said, "Your actions speak louder then words.