God has commited most of the 7 deadly sins: Part 2

Thanks for the debate. It has been fun. "Too bad they all go too waist. My oponent is stating that God doesn't sin. But killing is a sin, as stated in the 10 commandments." It says do not murder in the ten commandments which is different than killing. Even in the source you yourself provided it says murder. Sloth: "My oponent is stating in his rebutle [sic] that cancer is a way that humans don't live forever on earth. And that God can't allow people to live forever. Wow. That is so stupid, I don't know how to respond. So, God doesn't want us to be immortal, so cancer is a good way just to kill us!?!?!?!?!?!?" In the garden of Eden there was no human death. Human death only entered the world when sin did. I never said that cancer was just a good way to kill us. I did say that if everyone lived for ever we would be miserable. "By stating this, the neg is stating that cancer is a good thing, something we should be joyful about because it allows us to DIE. YAY CANCER!!!!!!!!!" I never said that cancer is a good thing. Greed: "So, he will use his powers unlike the doughnut to get his worship back? Sounds pretty damn greedy to me. My opponent is now saying that God can use his powers to make people worship him, but then he says God doesn't need worship a sentence later. He is contridicting himself." Saying that God can use his powers to make people worship him is not contradictory to saying he does not need worship. "Then he says we need to worship him because it helps us. Wow. So worshiping us helps us...... how?" It helps us become closer to him which is, for a Christian, one of the main goals of life. Envy: "YES! YES HE IS JELEOUS [sic] ! If he wasn't, why would he punish those who worship false Gods? Like with the Israelites in the desert who worshipped the Golden Calf" He punishes them because they are disobedient. Not because he is jealous. "is most definately "jealous of what is someone else's which is what envy is" which is word for word what my oponent [sic] states in his argument." You did not mention what God is envious of? You can only be envious of something that is someone elses. You did not say what he was envious of. Pride: "If they were dumb enough to think they could "could actually get to heaven", then yes, they are ludacrous, like my opponent states. Therefore, they are not smart enough to have a good place to start, so obviously they didn't think things out." They did not think they could actually get to heaven in the fist place. Gluttony: "Wow. Must I keep repeating myself? This is getting tiresome. God, without worship, without recognition, would have no power, because he has no influence on anybody, simply put." You can keep repeating yourself if you want. God would still have power without worship. Vanity: "My oponent says that the Bible is not directly opposed to the death penalty, but, again, THE TEN COMMANDMENTS INSTITUTED BY GOD SAY "THY SHALT NOT KILL". So yes, the bible is "Directly opposed to the death penalty". The ten commandments say do not murder. God is the one that instituted capital punishment (Gen 9:6). Romans 13:1-7 also says the government has the right to institute capital punishment when appropriate. "HE AGREES WITH ME THAT GOD IS GREEDY. HE AGREES. EVERYONE, READ IT AND WEEP. He agrees that God is greedy, I win greed automatically now, he himself explicitly agrees, I win that." I said if anything it would be greedy. I went on to show why it is not greed. I am sorry if the second part of my argument was in a smaller font or something so that you couldn't read it. "Wow. Again, just like the cancer argument, I am left speechless by how outragous this is. But, alas, this is debate, so I must continue. THE FLOOD WAS A GOOD THING?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?! THE FLOOD WAS AN ACT OF LOVE FOR YOU AND ME?!?!??!! WHAT?!?!?!?!?!??!?! Again, my opponent is basically spelling out "YAY DEATH!!!!" The flood killed many, many people, and killing is an example of vanity/wrath, so my opponent agrees with me that the flood killed lots of people, no one really can disagree that, so God has commited Vanity/wrath." Again, this debate is from the christian perspective since we are assuming the christian God exist. When we look at death from a christian perspective it is a good thing. Consider Ecclesiastes 7:1 "A good name is better than fine perfume, and the day of death better than the day of birth." I am looking forward to the day I die and go to heaven. Heaven will be much better than here on earth. I do somewhat disagree that the flood killed many, many people. It has been estimated that 2% of people lived before Jesus came to the earth and since the flood happened hundreds of years before that (assuming 7 day creationism. If not even longer than a few hundred years). Which means way less than 1% of people that have lived were wiped out in the flood. "Well, God may have said that, but my opponent ignores the fact that the devil is the most evil, diabolical, and influential being ever to exist. Sin and temptation is much easyer [sic] to commit that good. I agree that the devil is the most evil being that exists. That does not show God showing wrath. I also agree sin can be a lot easier to commit but that also does not show God showing wrath. The devil did influence them, but they did still sin. Which should be punished. God did punish them but punishment does not always show wrath and it does not in this case. Thank you for the interesting debate and your creative arguments. Pro, feel free to message me if you want to continue this discussion. Vote for whoever you think won. Thank you for your time.