Rapists Are Victims

"Before I begin, I would like to say that the resolution of this debate is "Rapists are Victims." It is not "All Rapists are Victims." Therefore, it would not be a loss for me to admit there are exceptions to my claim.You talked about rape in Uganda which attempts to make homosexuals straight. I believe such a thing can be done, but definitely not through rape.I was referring to men who raped men/women with sexual motives, though perhaps I should've made this more clear at the beginning of the debate.Let's take black people. The majority of incarcerated rapists are black according to this source:http://budokan.wcart.net......If you don't like this source, just let me say that it was shockingly difficult to find statistics on this.Now, let's take a look at Black Matriarchy. In 2011, 72% of Black babies in the United States were born to unwed mothershttp://en.wikipedia.org......I conclude that without fathers, many young black males (YBM) often are not adequately taught a sense of right and wrong, and thus they don't see rape as a serious crime.Do not interpret this as racist; I am merely stating facts.Women's Role:"22% who have sent or posted nude or semi-nude pictures or video of themselves: 22% of teen girls; 11% of girls ages 13-16"Source: http://www.safecom.net......Many (though not the majority) women INTENTIONALLY post suggestive photos of themselves! I understand that NO woman wants to be raped (unless they're really, really messed up in the head), but in a way many of them are encouraging it.Ultimately, I conclude that many men in today's American culture are victims of an increasingly sexual society, and that they are also victims of a society where many young people are not adequately taught right and wrong.I await my opponent's response."First of all, you have missed my point. To state that, rapists are victims, using the Oxford Dictionaries definition is to state that those who commit rape are victims. This means anyone who commits rape is a victim, even if you accept anomalies, your motion at least means the general population of rapists are victims due to the forcing of sex upon them. My stance is that this isn't true for the majority thus the motion isn't true. And for that, I will simply give some examples. But your motion was rapists are victims, you cannot cherrypick thus correctional rape and all types must count, you cannot change the motion halfway, that is semantics. First of all Saudi Arabia. This country follows Sharia law and all women must wear at least a hijab and a loose dress. The exploitation of women and the sexualisation of marketing we see in the western world is not present there on such a large scale. In fact it is so conservative women cannot drive. We don't see sex in marketing in Saudi Arabia, as frankly it is illegal. So, the statistics? 58.6 per 100,000 people are raped yearly in Saudia Arabia, as of 2006, and it is increasing. That is 16577 people were raped, without an influence or "victimization" of women, as women in Saudi Arabia cannot pose nude. Well, are these rapists victims? They may rape for sexual pleasure, or correctional, or just for the fun of it, but in any of these ways, it could not have been due to society causing this. 16577 rape victims is a lot. United Nations statistics of 65 countries show that in these 250,000 rapes are commited annually. Now, in the off chance that you dismiss this simply as an anomaly, we can head over to India. Second most populous country in the world, with 25,000 rapes in 2012. Now, let us take Asia in general. Viewed here, http://www.bbc.co.uk... a report of rape. In Bougainville, 12% of men have raped. That is 21019 people. Papa New Guinea is an LEDC and less likely to have this sexual influence. I do not know how many statistics I need to show to prove that a lot of rapists aren't victims to society as their society hasn't fully intergrated this, it is a western thing. Hopefully I have shown there are enough rapists who aren't victims of this to make the motion invalid. Thank you.