The C.I.S are the good guys during the events of the Clone Wars. [Star Wars]

Throughout this debate, particularly in round 4, my opponent attempted to use completely made up "facts", false claims that he did not fact check, outright lies, and bent truths. I will go over some of the most blatant lies: 1) My opponent claimed that Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi caused the Clone Wars when he investigated the illegal activity being carried out by the Geonosians and Trade Federation on Geonosis. The Trade Federation and C.I.S. were gearing for war. My opponent asks where the proof of this is. The proof is the First Battle of Geonosis (shown in Star Wars: Episode 2 " The Clone Wars). The C.I.S. had thousands of tanks and other such heavy artillery droids, along with millions of B1 and B2 battle droids. If the droids were meant as guardians for C.I.S. planets, why were there millions of battle droids all stationed on Geonosis, and why did they have heavy artillery droids? You don"t use heavy artillery and tanks to defend against pirates and slavers, you use them to fight a war. Furthermore, the entire Clone Wars was a plot engineered by the Sith Lord Palpatine. Therefore it is clear that the C.I.S. droid army was built to fight a war against the Republic clone army, thus fulfilling Palpatine"s plan. His plan did not include millions upon millions of droids being built as security guards. 2) My opponent claimed Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi had no jurisdiction to investigate the illegal activity on Geonosis, saying, "Geonosis was not a Republic System but a System in the Outer-Rim." This of course is wrong, Geonosis was a Republic System. The proof? It was part of the area known as the "Outer-rim", which was Republic territory. Furthermore, a Jedi"s jurisdiction, such as in the case of Kenobi, is not tied to the Republic if they are acting as Jedi, not Republic agents. So again, my opponent used false information to support his claim. 3) My opponent claimed in episode 10 of season 3 of the Clone Wars animated series that the C.I.S. became the side first willing to make peace. But in that very episode it is said, "In the past, whenever we've [the Republic] reached out our hands in peace, they've been slapped away." Clearly my opponent did not fact check or perhaps he was intentionally leaving out crucial information. 4) My opponent claimed, "The Republic exploits outer-core systems and oppresses them based on Species and Race." As I mentioned before, the wiki page on humanocentrism (http://starwars.wikia.com...) makes no mention of such activities. When I pointed this out previously and asked Pro for proof, instead of proving proof, he neglected to do so. Furthermore, Pro bent my words, claiming, "Con makes claims that I have no proof that the Republic was against Aliens." The only thing I said was asking him where his proof that the Republic exploited systems based on species and race is, not that the Republic was absolutely not racist against non-humans. But, Con was unable to provide proof and resorted to putting words into my mouth. In this debate, my opponent conveniently skipped addressing a major point which I brought up in my opening statement: the C.I.S. used weapons of mass destruction on neutral, innocent civilians (Clone Wars 1:13-14). Pro never once addressed this alarming contradiction to his claim that the C.I.S. was the good side of the Clone Wars. Ever since the beginning of modern international war crimes attacking civilian populations has been illegal. Attacking neutral civilians with weapons of mass destruction is even worse. And I will remind everyone that the C.I.S. was only TESTING their weapon on a civilian village with zero strategic value. Is the good side of the Clone Wars the side that tested weapons of mass destruction on neutral civilian populations? One of the main points my opponent brought up to prove the Republic was not the good side is the clone army, saying it was cruel for the Republic to breed clones that they would then send into war. However, if you watch the Clone Wars animated series, you will see many instances in which the clones are as compassionate as real humans, liberating the enslaved Twi"leks, saving a Twi"lek child, risking their lives for their brother clones, and refusing to carry out orders which are morally wrong. Without a doubt, the citizens of C.I.S.-aligned planets which were invaded by the clone army were treated infinitely better by the clones than their Republic counter-parts, who were enslaved by the C.I.S. droid army. The second main point of my opponent is that the C.I.S. was primarily a coalition to fight the injustices of the Republic. I do not deny that the Republic did have unjust laws, but the leaders of the Separatists, which included vile people such as Nute Gunray, Wat Tambor, and Shu Mai, were in it for the money and power. The other members of the C.I.S. were nothing more than pawns given the illusion of democracy. When the C.I.S. senate voted to open peace talks, Count Dooku instead aggravated the war, proving that the lesser systems who are given a place on the C.I.S. actually have no power, all of the power is with the evil leaders, who were far more concerned with their personal profits than achieving justice and equality for non-humans. When you vote on this debate you will be voting on who won, me or my opponent. I ask you to remember all of the self-contradictions, blatant lies, bent truths, and false facts of my opponent when you vote. Even if you still believe the C.I.S. was justified in the Clone Wars, and maybe even that they were the good guys, it is clear that my opponent did not win this debate.