Evolution Did Not Occur.

"Incorrect. There are other simpler life forms but I will let this one slide" Bacteria dates back to be the oldest life forms on Earth in science. "That is incorrect. Mutations can involve a loss or gain of information. A mutation can involve the addition, elimination, of shift of nucleic acids in a genome, resulting in the production of different proteins. " I apologize for my misconception. But, even if information is gained also, why is bacteria one of the most simplist types of organisms we have today? I know that there are simpler organisms such as nanobacteris and others, but bacterial goneomes contain much less information than any other genomes today. In that case, pretty much all of the information would have had to been gained. According to my understanding of the topic, through mutations, more information is changed/aletred or at a loss than gained. How is it that pretty much most of the orgnaimss today have more information in their genomes? "The fossil record dates back the necessary hundreds upon thousands of years and places organisms in their respective time periods." How do we know our method of dating is correct? We don't. We have no idea that such and such animals evolved from so and so species. Here are some more facts that prove against evolution from http://emporium.turnpike.net.... I do know that this is just a website, but after doing some research, this is some more information that I came up with. Evidence #1 There are no transitional links and intermediate forms in either the fossil record or the modern world. Therefore, there is no actual evidence that evolution has occurred either in the past or the present. Evidence #2 Natural selection (the supposed evolution mechanism, along with mutations) is incapable of advancing an organism to a "higher-order". Evidence #3 Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals, each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world. Evidence #4 The supposed hominids (creatures in-between ape and human that evolutionists believe used to exist) bones and skull record used by evolutionists often consists of `finds' which are thoroughly unrevealing and inconsistent. They are neither clear nor conclusive even though evolutionists present them as if they were. Evidence #5 Nine of the twelve popularly supposed hominids are actually extinct apes/ monkeys and not part human at all. Evidence #6 The final three supposed hominids put forth by evolutionists are actually modern human beings and not part monkey/ ape at all. Therefore, all twelve of the supposed hominids can be explained as being either fully monkey/ ape or fully modern human but not as something in between. Evidence #7 Natural selection can be seen to have insurmountable social and practical inconsistencies. Evidence #8 Natural selection has severe logical inconsistencies. Evidence #9 The rock strata finds (layers of buried fossils) are better explained by a universal flood than by evolution. "Many ...believe in evolution for the simple reason that they think science has proven it to be a `fact' and, therefore, it must be accepted... In recent years, a great many people...having finally been persuaded to make a real examination of the problem of evolution, have become convinced of its fallacy and are now convinced anti-evolutionists." -- Henry Morris, former evolutionist.