In a fight, Voldemort and Dumbledore would beat Megatron and Optimus Prime.

I will quickly finish off what I couldn't last round:7: Once again I want to stress on Megatron's laser eyes. If either wizard tries to apparate, the laser will surely hit them before they can, because in order to cast the spell faster than the speed of light, your hands will need to move really fast. In the books, whenever Dumbledore apparates, the book stresses on a casual flick of the wrist. This means that his movements are not faster than light, meaning that the laser will hit him before he is able to apparate. Also, Dumbledore or Voldemort flying is not a big issue since Megatron can simply look up and shoot his lasers. As mentioned before, they can't possibly move faster than the speed of light since then they would have to be a blur, and Harry would not have been able to see Voldemort coming after them.I will rebuild and refute point 8 with the rest of the points, since they tie together.The Light Issue:Why must we assume that the lasers cannot move at the speed of light? Actually, in Volume 2, Chapter 8 of the transformers manga, Bumblebee says specifically that Megatron's lasers move at the speed of light, translated from Japanese, of course. Therefore, Optimus being able to dodge and block lasers are a result of another factor, Maybe Optimus was just lucky, or Megatron was having a bad day. Who knows. The point is, Megatron's laserrs move at the speed of light. And FYI, Megatron is the only transformer who can shoot lasers from his eyes.My opponent tries to disprove me using Jedi in Star Wars. But I must remind viewers that the Jedi have the force. Many force abilities give them enhanced physical capabiltiy. So yes, they can dodge and block lasers, but they would not be able to if they did not have this force. The wizards do not have this force. Therefore, no enhanced physical ability. Therefore, they can't dodge lasers like the Jedi.I think you misunderstood my reality argument. What I meant was that in movies, as you use this as a valid source alot, the spells can't move at the speed of light. If they did, they would be a blur, and we would not be able to see them as clearly as we can. I was also assuming that these characters were somehow magically transferred into our world to fight. I apologize. You were not very clear in the first round. In books they are described as a "flash of light". PeacefulChaos, have you ever heard of figurative language? For example, when I say "I died laughing." Did I really die? No. It is meant as an exageration or a comparision. It is not to be taken for it's literal meaning. Therefore, this does not prove that spells move at the speed of light. In fact, I have already proven that spells do not move at the speed of light, meaning that robots can dodge them, and lasers move at the speed of light, meaning that wizards can't dodge them. Once again, if wizards moved at the speed of light, we would not be able to see them as they would just be blurs in movies. My opponent has not addressed my enhanced physical ability argument, so I assume that he agrees with me that wizards do not have enhanced physical ability. In the end, I win on this light issue for the reasons I have stated above. Therefore, as PeacefulChaos says, I should win this debate.1. That was just a side point. You missed the main crux of my argument. What the main point was Starscream is not as trained as Megatron or Optimus, much like how Ron is not as trained as Dumbledore. This debate isn't even about Starscream so I have no idea why you would bring that up. As for the Imperio point? Once again, figurative language. A simile in fact. Harry described it "it was like a giant hand was pressing on my back." Not to be taken for it's literal meaning. Therefore, Voldemort or Dumbledore cannot use this to block lasers. As I have already mentioned, lasers also move at the speed of light, as spells do not, so they would not be able to counter them like they can with spells.I would say that those are screams of frustration. There is no solid evidence to prove that they're pain filled screams, so they could just as easily be screams of frustration. Once again, stupefy is a projectile. Starscream is not as trained as Megatron or Optimus. So they could easily dodge stupefy. My opponent uses the same argument for every point, and my fingers are growing tired of retyping the same rebuttal over and over again.2. No, that's not true at all. The robots can dodge a projectile spell, where they cannot dodge a placed explosive, although either wizard would not get the opportunity to since these robots are stronger than Starscream. One is instant death, the other is the possibility of death, which is very low in the robot's case. My opponent has not addressed my point that projectile spells are easily dodged and hold no force, so I assume that he agrees with me again.3. Once again my opponent has not addressed the possibility of a stalemate. The robots can simply wait until the wizards show themselves and then attack. It must happen sooner or later. Once again, look at my first rebuttal. Apparating is not a possibility when Megatron has lasers.4. My opponent doesn't even attempt to address this rebuttal.5. The inferi are reanimated dead bodies. From Google Definitions reanimated means: to restore to life or consiousness, to revive. This means that the inferi do have some life, which would explain why Petrificus Totalus works. Robots not alive, so doesn't work. 6. Yes, it is a beginner's mistake when using it on living things not objects, like when, I forget who, but there was someone who turned another person's ears into a pig's ears, when they meant to turn the entire body. When you have objects, you have only 1 part, not like a person, where there are many parts you can transform (i.e. ears, fingers, etc.) You keep saying that the wizards are the most powerful people. But there are limits to power. By your logic, the wizards can turn the entire universe into a brick of the same weight, because you're sure they can pull it off. Does that sound even remotely reasonable? Then why does Voldemort have trouble killing Harry if he has this much power? Easy answer. He doesn't have this much power. 8. You can't compare the goblet to these two robots. They are of different size and purpose. The goblet has one purpose only, so perhaps it is easier to use the confundo spell as a result. The robots have minds of their own, as well as being huge, as well as being not living things. Therefore, it is logical to assume that the confundo spell will not work. I'm sure that if my opponent had the opportunity, he would stress on Voldemort and Dumbledore's power. But like I said in rebuttal 6, what limit is there to their power if they can do anything, it seems? There is always a limit to power. If Voldemort was all powerful, as you say, how come it was so difficult to kill Harry? Why couldn't you turn his wand into a bunny, or change him into a brick, or change his head into a C4, or stupefy, or confundo, or reducto him? It's because there is a limit to power. Therefore, although they are powerful, they will not be able to kill the robots.Conclusion:My opponent has not addressed several points. I assume that means he agrees with me.Therefore, you should vote PRO! Also, don't vote based on the amount of arguments. A lot of PeacefulChaos's arguments could have been put under one argument. Although I did not have alot of arguments, I have destroyed all of PeacefulChaos's arguments, and my arguments are still valid. In the end, wizards can't move faster than light, as it's not physically possible.Spells can't move faster than light because wizards can dodge.Wizard's can't apparate faster than light because then wouldn't they be able to dodge every spell and never get hit? But in both the books and movies they get hit by spells, that don't move faster than light.Therefore, lasers will hit wizards.Therefore, wizards die.This has been a fun debate. I hope to debate with you, PeacefulChaos in the future.