Is it likely that God exists.

In this debate I will be defending the position of atheism. Imagine that you live in a stone age. Suddenly you realise that the world is complex and you don't know what is going on. How does a tree grow? How does the sun shine? Why does the wind blow. Stone age people weren't able to answer any of these questions. What happened then? Science came along and explained all things. And up to this day it hasn't stopped trying to explain the world around us. Theists are running out of space to fit their God in. How do stars form? Must be God. No actually science has a pretty good explanation for that too. Now theists are asking big questions. What is consciousness, how did life come into being, what created the universe? All of these are good questions. However history thaught us that God is not a good answer. An example of this argument is Bill O'Reilly's tides go in tides go out argument.Link: https://youtu.be...There are thousands of religions around the world. All of them are different in many ways. The question is which one is true? Could all of them be true? No because all of them contradict each other. So either one of them or none of them is true. Now imagine if Usain Bolt had a race with 5 year old kids. Youd expect Usain Bolt to win the race by far. If any one of the religions was true you'd expect it to stand out from other religions just like Usain Bolt. After all you're comparing God made religion to a man made religion. Well... none stand out. The message of the Bible is not gonna convince anyone other than a Christian. The message of the Quran is not gonna convince anyone other than a Muslim. That's exactly what you'd expect once you assumed that religion is man made. No religion is true. Now I'm gonna address my opponents first argument. Kalam's argument or the Uncaused Cause argument is based on 3 premises where the third premise is the conclusion of the first two premises. Let me begin by saying that premise 1 is not true. Not everything needs a cause. Intuition is one of the enemies of science if you put too much trust in it. Things CAN pop into existence out of nothing. It sounds crazy but it does happen on quantum scale. If you wish you can read about quantum fluctuations. Logical arguments cannot be used to explain reality. Let me use Thunderf00t's example.1. Any object that gets pushed forward speeds up.2. An apple is an object.3. Therefore if I push an apple that is travelling at the speed of light it will travel faster than light. The 3 premises logically make sense. However it can't be used to describe reality despite what our intuition tells us. The second argument made by my opponent is the fine tuning argument. You believe that the universe was designed for life however it only appears designed. Only a small portion of our planet is habitable by humans. Everyday millions of us die from diseases, disasters etc. Only about 0.00000000000000000000000000000001% of the universe can support life. Most of the universe is just an empty space. We just so happen to live in a place that does support life. I'd be quite amazed if we lived in a place that can't support life. Then I'd believe in a divine power.