this script should be made into a feature length film

I strongly affirm the resolution which states "This script should be made into a feature length film." Now given that Mr. Perry is the instigator, the means the burden of proof belongs to him. Ladies and gentleman, please note that he has provided no arguments to defend his position, thus has not upheld his stance. Even if he manages to refute my arguments, you will still have no reason to vote in favor of him unless he provides arguments for his side. This is because merely refuting my arguments and claiming he won would be committing the negative evidence fallacy (more on that, if requested in the comment section or by my opponent). In addition, you should immediately consider voting against the instigator for conduct since he has refused to give an argument in his first round. In addition, please note that this debate concerns a feature LENGTH film. In other words, we're merely discussing a film which has the length of a feature film (it doesn't necessarily have to be a feature film). For more info, see here: http://en.wikipedia.org... Without further ado, let us begin: CONTENTION #1: This script could easily serve to be the script of a "Porno". 1) Now if you aren't familiar with pornographic films, allow me to fill you in on one common trait which they possess: Pornographic films generally don't have a sensical plot, given that the main purpose of the film is simply nothing other than the pornography. Individuals (generally men) are more interested in "wrenching out their housepipe" than they are in the story. It's like Call of Duty 4. Gamers don't give too much of a crap about this storyline which they've seen a thousand times before; gamers are simply interested in the gameplay. 2) There's a lot of potential in making this film a porno. A) Observe the following lines created by my sophisticated opponent and note how they all include sexual innuendo: "Tree-Hey! those are Mine!!! How would you like it if somebody just came and randomly decided to grab your coconuts? huh? COMMENT: What? If somebody just CAME and randomly decided to GRAB your COCUNUTS? I'd say that somebody would like it alot. "Scarecrow-Ow ow ow ahh oh the pain, agh" COMMENT: Pretty self explanatory. "Dorothy goes for coconuts runs into tin man" COMMENT: Dorothy seems pretty desperate to get to those cocunuts. Even enough for her to make the move and RUN into the tin man (can you say "cow girl": http://en.wikipedia.org... ). One might even say she was amorous. "Dorothy-Blank stare……….. look! A man made out of tin!!! Tin Man-Oil Can! Oil Can! Dorothy-What? Tin Man-OIL CAN! you blonde Dorothy-OH oil can. Oh well…" COMMENT: Oil = innuendo for Seman Tin = A clever way of suggesting that this character is "hard." I could go on, but these are sufficient to establish my point. B) Wizard of Oz/Lord of the Rings crossover porno film? C'mon, this hasn't even been done before. Ergo, this film would be more or less original (which is good for a film to push towards). C) The hard core fans of both series will have something to pleasure themselves to when they see their favorite characters doing that which they were allowed to do on the big screen. CONTENTION #2: If not a porno film, then this can be a parody film. Indeed as it is often the case that a movie manages to be successful due to being so bad that it's good. This list of films and comments on said films is a good example of what I am talking about: http://www.webomatica.com... If this atrocious script were to hit the big screen, it could easily be a smashing success (and contrary to the previous movies I listed, more people would be likely to see it due the higher level of familiarity with the films "Wizard of OZ" and "Lord of the Rings" Thus, for the reasons listed above, I believe I've upheld my stance so far that the script mentioned in the first round ought to be made into a feature length film. Due to the vagueness of the topic, I will need some clarification before I elaborate on these arguments in more detail as well as provide a few additional ones. Thus, that will do it for now.