BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Cricket is a better sport than baseball

In my opinion, cricket is better than baseball as far as sports go. Here is why: 1) Cricket bats are more fun to play with than baseball bats. The flat surface allows for more variety in shot selection. With baseball bats, all anyone can do is hit it straight on, and that is not fun. 2) Bowling is better than pitching. Though there are plenty of different pitches (i. e. curveball, sinker, etc), there is not much else you can do to the baseball. But, in cricket, you can spin the ball any which way, make it bounce in different places, aim at the batsman's crotch if he happens to get annoying without having to suffer a penalty (well, you have to make the ball bounce first, otherwise it is illegal). There is more to do in cricket than there is in baseball. 3) More runs in cricket. Instead of having scores such as 4-2, cricket has scores such as 285-267. Just from looking at the numbers, I find cricket more interesting. One BATSMAN can score 4 runs in one BALL, but in baseball, one TEAM scores about that much in one GAME, and that makes baseball seem pathetic. 4) Longer games = more entertainment. Cricket games last either half a day, a day, or 5 days. Baseball games last 4 hours or so. Cricket lasts longer, so there is more time to play and enjoy the game. But, in baseball, you have approximately 3 balls; the amount of time is minuscule. 5) Coming back to the better shot selection, you can hit the ball in every direction in cricket. In baseball, the direction the ball can go in and count is 1/4 of that of cricket. In cricket you can hit the ball through your legs if you want and score runs, but that cannot be done in baseball. In cricket you can hit the ball wherever you choose. From the 5 reasons above, I say cricket is a better sport that baseball. This time around, there better be a taker.
rap battle.

My name so retarded, your name be the truth,My flow sick like stickin' d*** into a syphilis cooch,While your name be impressive,My name delivers a message,My name tells people I'm f***d up and not the one to mess with,You may be honest Abe,You may free a million slaves,But I lie better than the ocean before a tsunami wave,You're honest and hard-working; I'm filthy and a liar,You crush people's fantasies; I bullsh** and inspire,Your win-rate through the roof; nobody has one higher,But my flow be ov'ly smooth; call it Sasha Grey's vagina.Your name says 'blade' but your avatar's a bird,'Cause you fly away from conflict, the only bars you drop are turd,Yeah you droppin' sh** lil birdy; I be droppin' f***in bombs,Hiroshima's just a mushroom; funghus resembles your mom's.You may think my name means nothing but you're simply too confused,I'll f*** you up like Michael Jackson; I'm your dad, this is abuse,To you I'm a worthy opponent, to me you're a tool to be used,I'm a psychopathic maniac who has nothin' to lose,Imma rek your tryhard win-rate, make you go from rap to blues,You go on stage play depressing songs and you'll get even more boos.I decapitate my haters; you can call me Terminator,Your girl begs me to "come again" I say "I'll be back... Later",While I'm decapitatin' haters I'm usin' you as a blade,You exist to be used by me, it's a truth you can't evade,I'm a beast beyond comprehension; you're simply a little boy,My talents surpass debating, they're real-life worthy to deploy,My statistics aint on a website, they're in beds with wet stains,I have Jewish Girls beggin' me to F*** them like Hussein,Whether I'm Saddam or Obama, I'm undeniably insane,You're just a truth-telling dweller; you're pathetic and lame.
rap battle.

The only thing you're stealing is your own chance for respectand like the final boss of any game, you're about to get wreckedyou talk about pokemon and run your mouth amok like Garyyour father always wanted to raise a man but got stuck with a fairyTalkin bout Mario, I'll falcon punch like super smash brotherscall me the boogie man, I'll harass until you dash under coversI'm an urban legend like slender man, look up at night and you'll see meI took your sister out on a date and it ended with a flight of my creamy"bla bla, ha ha, kaka, mathafackah", good lord you're so lyrical!the cheapness of your raps are quite indubitably empiricalcalled me "blade-of-lies" so I grab the K and sprayed-his-eyesdepraved-he-cries, no hope, I laugh, as he lays-n-diesIdk why you think capitalizing the last word makes it BETTERyou're so unwanted you should change your pic to grandmothers SWEATERI'm done playing games with this dust cheap munchkinI shine brightly like the sun, he's just a bleek pumpkinhe's nothing, quite literally a speck of dirt on my shoesI murk when he snoozed and smirked when they showed his shirt on the newsnow he's missing, they body fishing - like it's a missionCall me Chef Bobby Flay frying him like a dish in my kitchenI'm popping pistons and running him off cliffs like retarded sheepbombard the creep, I leave his body charred next to the army jeepMy flow needs a heart bypass? Your flow needs to be shot on the spotI'm bombing your yacht, and yawning while you're spawning this snotomg that's what it is! It just hit me, your flow is like mucus and everytime I read your lines I'm left rebuking this doofusI have no ego to destroy, only a trio of torpedos to deployMy elo means I employ tactics like Odysseus in the Battle of Troywooden horses and all, I maul, as I slide in through your wallBlade-of-Truth is the name associated with your reign and your fallI write with shakespearean might like macbeth - this is a fight to the deathI'm mike tyson tonight, bricks thrown with a right and a leftleave your lip with a cleft, break this prick and stab a knife in his chestI take your life, break the strife, and make your wife recite I'm the bestI'm a wicked demon, who see's things you shouldn't believe inhow could this kid beat me when he's spitting with a mouth full of semenThe only time you were in the studio was when you fixed the booth speakeryour raps remind me of cow sh!t mixed with some truth_seeker
rap battle.

You'd taken down many foe but I'm the final boss, Cripplin' yo' win-rate and stealin; elo, it's a vital loss, It was nice playin' Mario with yo Goomba a**, You release your Charizard, you'd best attend a class, You got your pokeball, I'd got a testicle, I'm estinguishin' yo flame, I'm not impressed at all. Plagiarism bla bla, B**ch I'm laughing HA HA, Your accusation's Kaka, You're just a MATHAFACKAH, Song playin' DORE MI FA... SO LALALALA, This blade was made by liARs Not honest, holy friARs, Kiss your heighness's FINE ARSE, Come against me?! The HIGH STARS No goal for you just SIDEBARS, did I just flatline your SHITE BARS? Your flow needs a HEART BYPASS... I first annoyed your EGO, Soon'll destroy your ELO, You're just a wannabe BADMAN, I'm the genuine MADMAN FREAKSHOW, You're chained down but my FREEFLOW, Is so smooth you're ex-fans be like HE'S PRO, We're proud to say he's someone WE KNOW, Blade-of-Trash's Loss Count's No LONGER GONNA be ZERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Verse 1 reference explained: It was all related to the Charizard reference he made and related the concept of a game boss etc.
rap battle.

Pre-Rap NoteThere is literally no way on Earth that what I did was plagiarism. every single phrase or word Con jus tuse dhas been written somehwere on the internet brefore more likely than not in a rap so that's ridiculous to say that if you have part of it in common it's plagiarism.Clearly you can't handle that I flip all your lines against you adn then come up with even more ingenious ones. Stop relying on one line that happens to have 4 or 5 words in common with a Hopsin line and start actually focusing on how you're getting destroyed in this rap battle.Third Round of RapYou say I copy from song that people hear at the mall,The last time Hopsin was on radio was never at all,I'm the ridiculous St. Nicholas, You're merely an elf,Please educate yourself before you medicate yourself,'Cause you must high as f*** to come up with the s*** you do,Make an account named blade-of-lies 'cause what you spit aint true.The pronounciation of granite depends on the accent you use,In the accent with which one reads it could rhyme, your abuse...Is nothin' more than a series of unsubstantiated views.You may be paintin' mosaic, I paint on tiles every week,My cum's all over the bathroom, the kitchen and everywhere; I'm a freak,Sometimes I even kill and spurt the blood on the wall, tile by tile,Japanese flags up and down, oh how it makes me smile.My friend line didn't rhyme becaue I said 'almost rhymed',You should learn to not read word-by-word but rather line by line,Is that too much to be handled by your atom-size mind?With views as narrow as yours, I'd say you're partially blind.I'm not sure how you think you know the size of my penis,But I be manhandling Jupiter while you're tuggin' on Venus,What be spittin' is puke mixed with puke, potent poison so ill,What you be spittin' is a total lack of talent and skill.You skew me up like fondue? Well boy I got news for you,The lactose that your mother's milk lacks will get you iller than the flu,That's not to say that you're ill yet, if you got ill then you'd die,Your immune system's pathetic, and between you and I...I croak like a toad 'cause when confronted you dont' fight, you fly.The reason you had to snatch the microphone is because its home is me,I'm a naturally born rapper, pure as f*** poetry,You're half trash, half diarrhea, I'm a godly pedigree,My superiority is crystal clear to see,If you don't fear me yet, you learn pretty slowly,I don't blame you though; you don't really know me. I came in this came spitting raw,My flow hot like fire, youre icy ego began to thaw,From that point on, I'm not sure I could call you a rival,I prefer the term snowball, you on a downhill spiral,I highly suggest that you shut your piehole,I'm a treetrunk boy, you merely a branch,You're just a rollin' snowball, I'm a f***in' avalanche!
Liberalism is smarter, more efficient and more unfair than socialism.

"You provided the definition of socialism, and then decided that the "community as a whole" part of the definition meant the government. But it doesn't mean the government." If we are not going to refer to the entity that represents "the community as a whole" by the name "government," what do you suggest we call it? You can call it whatever you'd like (club, cult, troop, brotherhood, commune, association), but for the sake of this debate whatever word you pick I will consider interchangeable with the word "government." "Because capitalism is a liberal policy, this demonstrates how aspects of liberalism are less efficient, therefore less smart." Your entire argument was against capitalism and not liberalism, and you justified it by claiming that capitalism was a liberal policy. Capitalism is a conservative ideal and is only associated with liberalism in that it plays host to the parasite that is liberalism. Liberalism assails upon capitalism as a source of funding, and that is as far as the relationship goes. More importantly, even if you were able to prove capitalism is a liberal policy, your argument claiming capitalism is less efficient than government is very weak. All the "planned obsolescence" in the world would not compensate for the lack of efficiency on the part of governments. Again, show me more than a few cases (not that I can think of one) where government has created a better product for less. "...the government has continually slashed the budget on all programs and services needed by the working class, all in the name of giving tax breaks to the wealthy. Education, health programs, workplace safety and other services have increasingly decreased. "The slashing of the education budget, and the introduction of religious creationism into the public schools has given American education a serious blow" - D. May, not to mention the cut in public workers (teachers) salaries... How is this policy smart?" Personally I think it is very smart, but I'm not a liberal, and the percieved injustices you mentioned are not the product of liberal policy. So your example says nothing about the "smartness" of liberalism. You have turned this into a debate on whether socialism is better than conservatism. "...I have argued all of your points and made better ones." I'm waiting for that to happen so we can get back to the topic at hand. So far you have been citing the numerous offenses on the part of capitalism and its conservative backers who you say seek to slash social programs and encourage corporate greed and tax breaks for the rich.
Liberalism is smarter, more efficient and more unfair than socialism.

"socialism advocates for an economic democracy, NOT government or state ownership or control." Socialism in a literal sense advocates vesting ownership and control of "means of production" (land, capital, etc) in the community as a whole(i.e. the government). http://dictionary.reference.com... So your argument that liberalism is not smarter because socialism does not advocate government ownership of property and means of production is undermined by this fact. Liberalism is beyond smart-- it is ingenious. I'll get to more on that in my next paragraph. "Socialism would also enable us to raise our living standards dramatically by ending the billions of dollars thrown away on arms production and "defense," by ending the waste, duplication and inefficiency of capitalist industries, and by returning millions of soldiers and unemployed workers to useful occupations" - Socialist Labor Party Statement" There is no waste nor inefficiency experienced by government in a competitive capitalistic market (or "duplication of capitalist industries" as it was referred to). There isn't even an expense involved for government unless you are talking about corporate welfare, which is not part of the liberal philosophy. Again, liberalism has devised a way to access only the upside and avoid ALL risk. Any failing industries competing in a capitalistic environment must bear the cost of their own inefficiencies. That is why liberalism goes beyond smart into the realm of ingenious. It has devised a way to feed off only the most efficient and hence profitable competitors. What other political philosophy has made its Nemesis (in this case capitalism) its lifeblood its slave. "Liberals think it is smart to allocate a ridiculous amount of tax payer money towards large government social programs." I agree. But socialism is nothing more than one enormous social program with the disadvantage that it is responsible for its own funding. Albeit this seems more fair, but this approach suffers due to the inherent inefficiencies resulting from government production. Can you think of even a handful of products resulting from government production that could compete with those produced in a free-market? Without the advantage of individual entrepreneurship, specialization, competition, and a profit motive to drive it all, inefficiencies abound. Private industry is simply a more efficient means of production. "Now the truth is that I consider myself a lot more socialist than I do liberal, thus I agree with your point that liberalism is more unfair than socialism." I think I've made my case for Liberalism being smarter and more efficient. Thank you for conceding that one. If you don't mind, what is your particular argument for claiming that liberalism is less fair than socialism?
Liberalism is smarter, more efficient and more unfair than socialism.

Contrary to popular belief, socialism advocates for an economic democracy, NOT government or state ownership or control. Under socialism, workers in any industry (scientists, coal miners, teachers, artists, doctors, etc.) would have delegates that make decisions for their field of work, such as what to produce and how much. This direct responsibility for a worker and their line of work is indeed more efficient than the liberal notion to have elected represenatives and other people in power who have nothing to do with the direct labor make decisions for people who are "beneath" them. I also argue that liberalism is not "smarter" in this sense because who better to know how to run a workplace than the delegates who actually work there? Here's another point. "Socialism would also enable us to raise our living standards dramatically by ending the billions of dollars thrown away on arms production and "defense," by ending the waste, duplication and inefficiency of capitalist industries, and by returning millions of soldiers and unemployed workers to useful occupations" - Socialist Labor Party Statement. Liberals think it is smart to allocate a ridiculous amount of tax payer money towards large government social programs. I disagree. That hurts our economy and takes away rights of the workers forced to pay into these programs that many feel are unnecessary and counterproductive to society (work output). This would also make society less efficient. Now the truth is that I consider myself a lot more socialist than I do liberal, thus I agree with your point that liberalism is more unfair than socialism. However I argue that because liberalism is more unfair, it is neither smarter nor more efficient.
Liberalism is smarter, more efficient and more unfair than socialism.

Under a classic socialist government, citizens provide the man power while the government owns and maintains the land, factories, office buildings, equipment and businesses required to generate economic production. Yes, a socialist government does what it wants with the profits resulting from such production, but it also assumes all the risks, costs, burdens and responsibilities of business ownership. Liberalism, on the other hand, advocates a far more efficient (albeit more unfair) way to make money for government consumption. More simply, liberalism advocates taking whatever percentage of profit it sees fit from individuals and businesses while leaving all the headaches of business ownership to them. Unlike individuals and businesses under socialism, those ruled by liberalism would be responsible for acquiring, managing and maintaining their own capital, factories, employees, equipment, and office buildings. It is fascinating to me that liberalism has managed to come up with a way to receive all the benefits of business ownership with none of the burdens, risk or responsibility. If a business venture fails under liberalism, it has cost the government nothing because government had nothing invested. Yet if a business succeeds, the government is there with its hand out (and a gun in the other) to take its "fair share." Is it unfair to make a profit without enduring the cost, risk and effort required to do so? I'd say no. But isn't it smart in comparison to what those silly socialists had in mind?
We need to get rid of separate bathrooms

I wanna set one thing straight having a all in one bathroom might make women more likely to get raped and there's no cameras in the bathroom. We live in a world were both genders go to school, work in the same environment, go to the beach, store, walk outside and have sex. What's the big deal of separate bathrooms is it to protect women from men. There's 3 reasons why are separate bathrooms are a problem #1 most people heard in there life the women's line is so long that comes down to biological reasons that men have 2 options to get rid of their waste and women only have 1. #2 Transgender people don't know which bathroom to pick or if they choose the wrong bathroom they get attacked or abused. #3 Why is a mom bringing her son in the women's bathroom it's a women's bathroom same thing goes for a father bring her daughter in a men's bathroom. This shouldn't be a dilemma on this people go to the bathroom to empty their waste, wash their hands, check their face/makeup, phone or gossip. One large bathroom, gives women more access to toilets since men usually use urinals, transgender people no longer have to choose between a specific bathroom and parents can bring there son's/daughter's in the opposite sex bathroom.
We need to get rid of separate bathrooms

Yeah, we should get rid of separate bathrooms. I didn't read that paragraph that you wrote, but I wanna set one thing straight having a all in one bathroom might make women more likely to get raped and there's no cameras in the bathroom. We live in a world were both genders go to school, work in the same environment, go to the beach, store, walk outside and have sex. What's the big deal of separate bathrooms is it to protect women from men. There's 3 reasons why are separate bathrooms are a problem #1 most people heard in there life the women's line is so long that comes down to biological reasons that men have 2 options to get rid of their waste and women only have 1. #2 Transgender people don't know which bathroom to pick or if they choose the wrong bathroom they get attacked or abused. #3 Why is a mom bringing her son in the women's bathroom it's a women's bathroom same thing goes for a father bring her daughter in a men's bathroom. This shouldn't be a dilemma on this people go to the bathroom to empty their waste, wash their hands, check their face/makeup, phone or gossip. One large bathroom, gives women more access to toilets since men usually use urinals, transgender people no longer have to choose between a specific bathroom and parents can bring there son's/daughter's in the opposite sex bathroom.
China is being raped by some Western countries - the Tibetian crisis.

Liberating Tibet - the "Free Tibet Campaign" - was a British introduced, propagandized project (in alliance to the CIA) aimed at the containment of the expanding, powerful China. European and Western countries became accustomed over centuries to easy pillaging of China over recent centuries, and miss the fun. They are scared of China overpowering them and so have to find ways to dismantle the Chinese provinces - they are raping China. We believe that these Western powers should go back home and deal with internal affairs before contributing to international ones. They have no business in rousing Tibetian fervour especially if it is damaging to another country's stability - China. In the Tibetian crisis the western countries along with Tibet are taking advantage of the media spotlight on the Chinese Olympic games to appear as if in a plight or as if needing internional attention. This is an act of immorality and dissolution. The westerners should treat the host country with the same respect they had and should not lag and compromise the entire Chinese society by attempting to boycott the Olympic games.
Humans should colonize Mars by 2050.

I would first of all like to say my opponent has not refuted any of my points. Extend. To refute my opponent's argument involving money, we can easily use some of our 600 Billion, or 600,000,000,000 USD spent on the military annually. To compare, NASA's current budget is an annual 17 billion, a microscopic amount in relative. If the opposition is worried about national defense, the country with the second highest military budget, China, has a measly 130 billion, so there is no need to worry about such a thing. To refute my opponent's argument based on the technology, it will be easily available with the amount of money we can take from other things (an example being the previously mentioned US Military Budget). So, Voters, would you rather vote for a side completely based on speculation and that has not refuted any arguments, or a side offering many points and willing to help in the advancement of humanity altogether.
Humans should colonize Mars by 2050.

I'll admit, you were pretty good. You put a large amount in a single round. I look for ward to this argument. All your reasons weren't bad. However, you missed something. Where do we get the MONEY??? Second, where is the TECHNOLOGY that allows us to even SURVIVE ON MARS?? To get all that money, it would take 42 years, assuming that most people donated, and most likely, only 1/22930 may donate instead of 3/4 of all people.