Creationism (Pro) vs. The Big Bang Theory and Evolution (Con)

Thank you for your rebuttal and an apology for taking longer than expected for mine. First off, you should have no worries as I do not use the bible in any of my debates, especially this one. I love science and that is what I use. First off however, what is the definition of science? One of the definitions of science as described in dictionary.com: systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation. As we see here the word observation. Before I bring up my next point I would like for everyone to recognize that evolution does have many different meanings, 5 popular ones in science: 1. Cosmic Evolution (The origin of time space and matter) 2. Chemical Evolution (The origin of higher elements from hydrogen) 3. Stellar and Planetary Evolution (Origin of stars and planets) 4. Organic Evolution (Origin of life) 5. Macro Evolution (Changing from one kind of an animal to another) 6. Micro Evolution (Variations within kinds) Now onto my point, guess which out of those has only been observed. If you guessed anything other than 6 that is very much so incorrect. Micro evolution is the only kind of evolution to have ever been observed. This basically means taking a German Shepherd and a Husky and mating them to make a different variation of a dog. Macro evolution the kind people believe we evolved from is in my mind very ludicrous. Thank you, but I choose not to believe our entire existence started from a rock. See what evolutionists and scientists fail to prove is how one animal can turn into another. Sure there has been experiments done that made a very small organism turn into other small organisms. But these experiments were modified and closely watched. But we have yet to see an animal change into another animal with nature doing it on its own, without being in a controlled laboratory. I would like to also also mention the missing links in evolution if you want me to talk about it more I would be happy to. But I would like to pounce on the subject of DNA Complexity. The molecules in DNA/RNA are in fact so, so, so very complex that by evolution happening just by pure luck, is ludicrous to believe. I'm sure I can win the lottery an infinite amount of times before that even happened again. Of course it hasn't happened again lol. Humans are still on this Earth for the past million some odd years. And where is the next species that has supposed to been magically formed off of us. Haven't seen any yet. Evolutionists tell me that it takes millions of years to happen. My response "How convenient, well I don't see it happening anytime soon and all you have is an "explanation"" But somehow the belief that everything came from nothing and life came from non life is now growing to be the popular view on everything. Baffles me. Now I disagree with science teaching the big bang in public education. If they want to teach it in private schools fine by me. But the reason I have a problem with this is evolution and the belief in the big bang is nothing but a religion. Now people will throw at me a definition of religion is believing in a God. But I tend to use the 4th definition of Merriam-Webster: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith I use this solely because for one, evolution and the big bang is NOT science, it's a popular BELIEF done through a way of explaining that's how the world came to be. Something that makes sense? Not so quick. Take a look at these facts I have to present First, I would like to mention the planet Saturn is losing its rings. They are slowly moving away. If the planet were millions of years old, the material in the rings would have dissipated long ago. Secondly, Earth's rotation is slowing at the rate of one thousandth of a second per day. At this rate a billion years ago it would have been spinning so fast that centrifugal force would have caused it to fly apart. Thirdly, and my most favorite for debunking this, is the oldest living tree pinus longaeva is 5,066 years old according to ring count. With this said, shouldn't there be a tree or some kind of plant older than this, if life existed millions of years ago on Earth, without trees life cannot exist on Earth. People like to tell me they've gone extinct? All of them? And how is that? Okay so the big bang in my opinion, is even more ludicrous to believe. This is because it can't be experimented in a lab, nor can it be observed. Just merely explained. However, when you explain these things you'll find flaws in the Big Bang Theory. Let's start with dark matter and dark energy. This has never been and never will be proven. The dark doesn't mean color it means unknown. So yes, let's make up some fictional matter and energy that "made it happen". It's kind of like me saying I am the most powerful person in the universe. My power is everywhere and can do everything! You just can't see my power but it's there! And then someone with common sense saying, "pfft whatever man, yeah right." Now lets try cosmic inflation, the term inflation refers to the explosively rapid expansion of space-time that occurred a tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang. HOWEVER, this definitely violates Einstein's General Law of Relativity, in which apparently nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. But then, some scientist comes along to try to explain the big bang with a magical term "inflation" I use magical because again, it has never been proven or observe, while breaking laws of science. I would post more proofs however, I did not want to bore you on my correctness of a bunch of useless, boring reading, when I have made my point. As Kent Hovind said it best: Humanist view: "Amazing this big bang made the world from absolutely nothing" Creationist view: "Incredible design there must be a smart designer" Finally, I should also add, famous atheist scientist, Stephen Hawking even admitted to their being "some form of intelligence" at the University of Cambridge. The link to this article will be in my links descriptions below. So the reason I choose God over the big bang theory, is there is no contradictions. I've seen prophecies in the bible written thousands of years ago come alive today. Only sourcing this, just one time, because as many proofs as you bring from science, I can falsify it with more science, with kind of like a bonus of proof from the bible. So I urge you to let me use biblical references to correlate what backs my science for my potential next rebuttal. As I say, the bible may not be able to be proven. But the fact's don't lie. Saturn Losing it's Rings: https://www.scientificamerican.com... Earths Rotation Slowing: http://www.sciencemag.org... Oldest Living Tree: https://www.fs.fed.us... Facts pertaining evolution/religion: https://www.chick.com... Flaws in the Big Bang: http://thetechreader.com... Flaws in Evolution: http://www.patheos.com... Stephen Hawking: https://worldnewsdailyreport.com...