The resurrection of Christ was fabricated, added in later stuff.

I just realized that one of the scriptures was not written by Paul, as you said... my mistake. You say that the 1 Corinthians 15:14 verse by Paul was talking about the spiritual body thing, in which I personally still don't understand what your trying to say. If your trying to say that he wasn't talking about Jesus being risen, then I also give you these verses. For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance[a]: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures. 1 Corinthians 15: 3-4 https://www.biblegateway.com... He clearly said that Jesus was raised on the 3rd day, and I'm not sure still what your trying to disprove about this with the spiritual body argument. Paul also writes this, But if it is preached that Christ has been raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith. 1 Corinthians 12-14. Paul clearly states that he believes that Jesus rose from the dead. I don't know what your trying to disprove. As for what you said about William Lane Craig, is nothing more that what anyone would say about someone that they disagree with. What you are saying about him I could also say about Richard Dawkins, or even you, because there are lots of assumptions you have made that aren't true either, same with Richard Dawkins. You would have to give me evidence in which I can look at for myself, that he clearly does this. I also haven't found were you say that Craig puts words in Paul's mouth. Who is to say that "Of Arimathia" means a town? Why don't they say Peter of Bethsaida? They don't, but for some reason the say "Of Arimathia," and who is to say this means a town rather then a family name? Why would people that want to create a fake story and write a gospel that says 'Of Arimathia" if the people reading know that "Arimathia" doesn't exist, they would have to be stupid. Even if the Gospel about was written 40-60 years later, that's still an amazing thing, considering there are other things written about events that are thousands of years later, yet they are considered fact. You say then that I cant say that Jews and Christians knew were Jesus was buried, but I say that you cant say that they didn't because you would then be making a contradiction yourself! If no one knew were he was buried, then how would anyone then steal the body? You cant say no one knew were he was buried then say that the Christians stole the body if they didn't even know where he was buried! The women that went to honor Jesus with there spices knew were Jesus was buried, and they didn't go like if his body was gone! You then say that I cant assume that guards were there, I didn't assume I went off of the scriptures. Pilate said to them, "You have a guard; go, make it as secure as you know how." And they went and made the grave secure, and along with the guard they set a seal on the stone. Matthew 27: 65-66 The guards only guarded the tomb for 3 days because that's what was being said, that Jesus was going to arise in 3 days. The women went to honor Jesus, which the guards would of let then do, they didn't go in a way that they didn't expect guards to be there. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 1 Corinthians 15: 6, you made another assumption that Jesus only appeared to the followers, if Jesus didn't appear to all of these people, there is no why the Christ movement could of happened. http://biblehub.com... https://www.biblegateway.com... If people wanted to get power with a plan that says thing like, Jesus loves his enemies, and turns the other cheek, would be the most stupid plan ever. People in that day wanted things like an army of God, not a passive way of winning. Replying to your number 3, I was implying how much this event of Jesus was written about, its insane, yet its apparently nothing that millions of people have wasted there life believing it, because some Albert Einstein created a genius plan to trick so many people that hated Jesus into loving him, even though they had thousands of Jews saying it wasn't true, and the Romans. Your number 4 needs to be explained better. THE ROMANS DID CARE THAT'S WHY THEY KILLED JESUS! If the Romans didn't care what happened with the Jews than Jesus would still be alive! They did care, because no one wants the religion side of there empire to have riots and stuff over a lie! It makes perfect sense why they wanted to guard the tomb as well! The thing about the disciples, wasn't written directly in the bible I just realized, but in other side books about the bible I believe.