ATHEISM over THEISM

Disclaimer: I am, in fact, an atheist; I am merely debating to ensure my skill in debating against positions I strongly believe in. For lack of a proper definition of "God", I hereby take God to mean: the primal force behind creation. In 1927, a Catholic priest Georges Lemaitre proposed the most widely accepted theory in particle physics for the creation of the universe: the Big Bang, which was proven possible by Edwin Hubble in 1929. The Big Bang states that in the beginning, there was a singularity. In quantum physics, a singularity is a point in gravitational spacetime with infinite density and zero volume (Source: home.web.cern.ch - the Official Website of the European Organization for Nuclear Research [CERN], en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity). Examples of singularities today include the focuses of black holes. From this singularity, erupted the purest form of energy: photons. The photons erupted in a mass of energy, provoking a "reverse-annihilation" of matter and antimatter, thus creating the first particles of matter and antimatter. The Big Bang theory is clearly described in the Hindu scripture, the Mahabharata: "When this world was first without light, plunged in absolute darkness, a golden seed emerged from a single point: of inexhaustible matter that expanded into the universe; and Bramha (or Brahma) the Creator emerged as this Mahadivya, Brahman itself, that is God, became the universe." (The Complete Mahabharata: Volume I - Adi Parva, translated by Ramesh Menon; The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dvaipayana Vyasa, translated by Kisari Mohan Ganguli) In Sanskrit, the universe is referred to as Brahmanda, or Brahman-anda. The word "Brahman" derives from the root Brh, which means "to expand", and Anda means "egg", a reference to the elliptical shape of the universe according to modern physics. (source: Wikipedia) As described, the Mahadivya, of inexhaustible matter, also had energy; that is similar to the theory of Hawking radiation, that says black holes radiate energy. Since this is a Hindu perception of God, I can take it to mean "God." For lack of proper definitions, the Big Bang reigns supreme in that the universe had a primal force creating it. And what of the Taoist, Buddhist, Christian and Hindu ideas of the omnipresence of God? The cosmic quantum entanglement theory is a theory in particle physics that all particles in the universe are under a quantum entanglement, i.e. they interact in ways that the quantum state of each particle cannot be described independently; instead, a quantum state is given to the system as a whole. (source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement; www.newscientist.com) This is similar to the entangled force of the Dhammakaya of Buddhism, Tao of Taoism, and the omnipresent God, or Allah, in Abrahamic religions, and even the Hindu Brahman. So, by this definition, God DOES exist, as an omnipresent, creative force; only a Supreme Being may not. "Science and religion are not at odds. Science is just too young to understand." -- Angels & Demons by Dan Brown Note 1: Definitions cannot be restated in the second round, as it has not been mentioned in the first. Note 2: God is not a substitution for science; what if science is God? That is the concept of theo-physics. Sources: The Tao of Physics by Fritjof Capra; Wikipedia; www.newscientist.com; The Complete Mahabharata by Ramesh Menon; The Mahabharata of Krishna Dvaipayana Vyasa by Kisari Mohan Ganguli