Creationism as truth should not be taught in schools (Contender: Con)

Greetings; I am well versed in this topic so this should pose a very interesting subject. Although you are correct that the theory of evolution as the cause of the origins of life Is in fact generally accepted, I cannot help but assert, that .... well, it's completely and totally false as a theory and as a realistic or even serious alternative to creationism. You see there is more evidence in support of creationism than believable or even credible evidence in support of evolution? The theory of evolution with its myriad of reports fails to provide realistic origins. Despite experimentation over decades, science has come up empty. Nothing to support realistically any report they have generated. No doubt this comes as a huge surprise to the atheist of the world, still one cannot help but wonder, why no one to date has ever actually asked for proof? Real proof, not conjecture, supposition, guesses, hypothesis and the like. genuine in your face evidence like say ..... an actual animal?Check it out for yourself. It doesn't exist, the absolute best the scientific community with it's stellar commisions of the top scientist of the entire world could produce was a microbe, a bacteria ..... sorry but that's a far cry from origin of life! You see science has nothing to show for their experiments but a huge bill and tons of paperwork, but..... not a creature in the lot. You see the animal kingdom is exact and specific.Here's where people begin to feel uhmm, stupid? But it is what it is. Everyone is in the same boat we all bought off on sciences imaginings, their degrees and phd's doctorates and such that we forgot that degrees don't make you smart, just educated. We small undegreed individuals, though lacking in degrees still possess reason, intelligence, and the ability to percieve what is and what is not?With all the awestruck enthusiasm of a schoolgirl at prom, we saw stars as the big brained super intellects told and explained to us how they created this microbe and the bacteria ..... we were enthralled to such a degree that for some of us, after the glow was gone suddenly realized, Hey, wait a minute, Microbes and bacteria become diseases sure but not animals? Hmmm, for life to reproduce you need an egg (ovum), you need a male to fertilize that egg and you need adults to care for the newborn ... hey waitaminute?There you have it .... evolution 101, busted, can't reproduce animals, humans mammals, amphibians, heck you can't even grow grass without seeds???Don't feel bad, nobody else caught that either. Tell me though have you ever actually seen any animal created by science without an egg? I mean seen an actual picture or one on film? Nope same 8.7 million species that existed in the first place science has added exactly zero species or creation to the animal world. So this naturally begs the question Should we be teaching evolution as the origin of life at all, since it has been proven by science as impossible for it to have occurred? As to creationism? Certainly we should continue teaching it above all things .... why? Because it's the only thing that actually answers all the questions without leaving any question but one? How did God do it? Course He didn't tell us. He did tells us how it all started though, it's found in Genesis and it's the only creation story of all religions that's concise and to the point?allow me to refresh your memories; Genesis 1:11 Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.20 And God said, “Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.” 21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.” 23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day.24 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” 27 So God created mankind in his own image,in the image of God he created them;male and female he created them. 28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so.31 God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day. So now you see why the creation story should be taught? The facts proven by science are these1. Life should not could not possibly exist upon the earth outside microscopic organisms, just like Mars, The Moon, Jupiter, Pluto, etc... 2. Life could only have been put on the earth as adults, with which to procreate, as males, and females are equally required for 90 plus percent of the species to reproduce, and seed is required for all plants, trees etc...3. How? Miraculously, magically or through some unknown way life was created as it is to exist as it is, by a means far beyond sciences and human understanding to the present.4: "When you eliminate the impossible, what remains however improable must be the truth" Arthur Conan Doyleso you see, the miracle of the origins of life is that we are actually here, and 2 billion people know who is responsible, because God reveals Himself to those 2 billion, well most of the 2 billion, but that leaves 4 Billion people who haven't even bothered to think it through at all, just blind belief in a lie. Prove it for yourselves: You won't find anything though, some guy named Cobalt already tried and knows it don't exist, in fact during our debate on this subject he blew a gasket over my Rules;Rule #1: REPORTS Disallowed except as follows: Any reports must also be accompanied by video or photographic evidence, which shows claimed process in action, culminating in living biological creature. (Video and photographic restrictions apply).Rule#2 VIDEO, PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE Must be in Real photographs, live action, not animated or drawn. Must show progression from inception to a living biologic creature of the nature of, mammals, insects, birds or plant life. May be stop action, or time-lapsed as needed.Cobalt said;Before I begin talking about that, though -- I would like to agree with the opponent that there is a definitive lack of absolute proof regarding evolution. Cobalt response: This is a fantastic point, except there is plenty of evidence supporting the theory of evolution. Does any of it live up to Pro's evidential expectations? No.