An objective moral code is contingent on the existence of God

My stand point is obvious I don't think that you need God and/or a god in general to have a moral code. Now the reasons why I have this philosophy are 1. Human feelings of empathy and sympathy2. Societal influenceNow those are just overlays, and below I'm goanna go into more detail.Human feelings of empathy and sympathy:Humans generally have the feelings/emotions of sympathy and empathy (Sympathy is feelings of pity and sorrow for someone else's misfortune. While empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.) How these two relate to morality is that these are the two basic emotions that cause us to form our morals. We naturally feel these emotions they are not taught to us while it is true their definitions are that's different. Moving on, these emotions are what cause us to deceiver what is right and what is wrong because with these emotions we can place ourselves in that persons shoes, I don't go out a kill dogs because I can imagine and feel/imagine how terrible it must to die and lose a family pet. Its the same reason why if its someone's birthday and I enjoy their company I'd say happy birthday because I can imagine if they didn't say it to me on my birthday and how terrible it must feel. Now, lets say your at the subway and someone falls onto the track and a train is coming so you jump down and save them, you do that not because God is telling you that its right you do it because its what you do its something that I call group survival. What that is is that because they are human and because they are part of my species I have a natural instinct to see that they survive because I know that in order for the specie to survive I need to ensure that as many of my species lives for as long as I can. Now that's not to say that if a dog fell that you wouldn't do the same thing but its less likely that a person would risk their own life for a pet rather than for another person. Its cruel but its the world we live in.Societal Influence:When this type of debate comes up people on the opposing side like to say "Well, if there no punishment for bad things such as sin then what's wrong with thing like Hitler's concentration camps or religious persecutions or etc. etc." The problem with this is that your taking someone's societal influence and different moral up bringing to your own, and the problem with that is that you can't really begin to understand why those things happen (And obviously if you can I'm not speaking to you.) Anyways when you get someone with a different moral upbringing what they do seems wrong overall when in reality there's no real issue with it because there is no whole world morality because the world is so diverse. Someone like Hitler and the Nazi party were brought up believing Jews were evil and that it was their religious/righteous duty to kill/ stop them at all cost. Meaning that what their doing wasn't wrong to them. Now, I don't agree with Hitler at all I'm not saying "Yeah they were totally right." No, I'm saying that within their own society what they were doing wasn't morally wrong. But anyways my main point here is that religion doesn't teach moral upbringing its society always has been always will be. Now I'm not saying that religion hasn't influence society there for you and your loved ones that's actual a very accurate statement but modern day religions Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. don't teach you your morality unless your raised in a home that is heavily devote to that I'm referring to the general public. Society is what teaches us what our parents want us to think for example we think that slavery is wrong but in some societies think slavery's okay. Moving on, we learn our morals from society not from god we have morals and can tell the difference between right and wrong from our own society and not from religion.