Laws restricting teens should be abolished.

Work 1. Being a teen causes distrust. There is no evidence being a ten causes distrust. Should we restrict everyone who distrusts the system? And/or everyone who is not likely to complain? "Psychopathy" is a term used to describe individuals who meet certain characteristics. As with other medical conditions, we used a term to describe certain symptoms combined. In order to meet the definition of "psychopath," there must be persistent anti-social behavior. "Anti-social behavior", is another term for certain criminal behaviors. We don't confine someone who is likely to commit a crime, or if their psychologist/psychiatrist says they are likely to commit a crime, UNLESS, they actually have committed a crime or made a threat (innocent until proven guilty). 2. Trust in the system: it is actually caused by the age (alongside of many other possible factors): Can you cite a study proving this? Many people might say "the brain is not fully developed till 25" and I will link the study, but 1st a quote from the link. “The researchers speculated in their article that this may be due to a plethora of life experiences in young adulthood such as pursing post-secondary education, starting a career, independence and developing new social and family relationships.” http://www.news-medical.net... Elliot Valentin, a retired neuroscientist wrote a book called Blaming the brain, published in 1998. He wrote, “A persons mental state and experience can modify the brain just as surely as the other way around. When there is a correlation between these two events, we should not assume that we always know which way causation flows…. It has been shown in numerous experiments, for example. That exposure to stressful situations can produce long lasting brain changes.” And there was a study that showed that even when you're 40 and you become a taxi driver your brain rewires itself and new neurons grow in certain areas to help settle into your new career. Teens brains are influenced by their outside environment, including schooling, and all teens are required to go to school, so it makes sense that all their brains are the same. Lets compare those brains to the brains of teens in countries where they don't go to school and are married young. We might see a big difference. If it were the norm to finish high school at 25, there would be a new study saying the brain has not matured till 30. Education 1. And while you could argue that a mathematician needs only mathematics, a football coach needs only sports, etc., this is untrue. If someone needs a certain skill for their job (excepts for basics like reading and writing, which should be compulsory) they can learn it when they are training for their job. 2. First of all, young people usually are not able to decide which profession they will take. Then those who have decided can choose to leave high school early go to college. 3. These include rules, regulations, many ethical questions and cultural questions. Do you have a valid study to prove this? Teens don't think they are bad. 4. Tendency shows that, while breaking rules is common, breaking social norms is even more often. That is an assumption. 5. As such, if school would not be compulsory, likelihood shows that many teenagers would not continue their education. College is not compulsory, and many people still continue their education. 6. However, we have to see that many of the core skills are developed in high school. Then people should be able to choose between high school and college. Runaway 1. While there is truth in this, we also must mention that teens take more risk than an adult in case of unknown risks (which is common in real life). [link 8] While this is necessary, taking too much risk causes harmful consequences. This way, runaway law is preventive.That is not because of age, and I already proved this in the "education" section. You provided a link, but I proved above that risk taking is not because of age. Maybe one can argue that teens (for some reason other then age) are more likely to have factors that make them take risks, you can also argue this with an ethnic group. For example, Asians tend to do better in school, not because they are Asian, because they tend to live in states that offer better educational systems.