I have the biggest Penis in the world.

Thanks for the debate grobino. ==Burden of Proof== My opponent as instigator/pro must prove that his penis is larger than any other known penis anywhere in the world or in the course of history. As he points out, since people can lie and Photoshop can be used, we cannot trust my opponent. Thus, he, by definition, fails the BOP because he has chosen a topic that is unprovable in a debate. ==My case== C1) Non-human penises My opponent does not specify humans in his case. This means he automatically loses, since certain animals have penises that easily dwarf those of even the largest man's. The largest recorded penis belongs to a blue whale, with a total length of 8 feet. http://news.softpedia.com... This is likely longer than my opponent's entire body length. C2) Largest human penis Dr. Alfred Kinsey, the most famous sex researcher of all time, saw thousands of penises throughout the course of his career. The largest one he ever recorded was 10 inches. The largest recorded penis in human history was clocked in by Dr. David Reuben at 14 inches. http://www.seemagazine.com... It is doubtful that my opponent is larger than these measurements. C3) Proportionate to height/foot length Shaq is undoubtedly larger than my opponent. Look at his shoe size: http://www.shecklerfoundation.org... ==Rebuttal== ++ means an argument my opponent made ++Every girl I have slept with has commented on the size of my Penis, and always in a positive manner.++ Positive manner could be like Goldilocks: "not too big, not too small, it was juuust right." Women who encounter extremely large penises often comment in a negative manner because intercourse feels uncomfortable, as the penis head pushes up against their cervix. ++Of these girls around half of them claimed that it was the biggest penis they had ever seen, the other half refused to comment which, whilst it didn't prove my theory, also did not disprove it++ Actually it does disprove my opponent's theory. If he was the largest, they would have answered in the affirmative, but since they didn't want to hurt his feelings, they refused to comment. ++I have never seen another penis in my life apart from in pictures and on the internet. Photo-shop exists, and I have seen evidence of pictures of penises being enlarged through photo-shop. I have not seen any evidence to suggest that all of these pictures have not been enlarged digitally.++ My opponent seems to be admitting that he has seen pictures of larger penises than his online. While Photoshop can't be ruled out, it is unlikely to have been used in all of the pictures, especially if my opponent was viewing a movie clip. ++I have seen a pornographic video in which the males prosthetic large phallus falls off, to reveal a penis smaller than my own. I have not seen any evidence to suggest this method of penis enlargement is not used in all pornographic films.++ This is a classic fallacy - generalizing from too small a sample size. My friend's uncle works in the pornography industry, and I can guarantee you this practice is not widespread. This also makes no sense. The money shot - recording the male orgasming - would be impossible in pornography if all men had a prosthetic on. The fact that the video my opponent is referring to would show this "blooper" rather than cutting it out during editing shows that the video must have been some sort of unique parody. Negated.