There is no misogyny. There are difference and diverse manners of treating females.

Be it beating up your wife, honour-killing some female in the family, or stoning females to death, there is no "misogyny". The thing, and the only thing we witness from even those events is the fact that we have different, diverse manners of treating females, and we constantly apply those manners to females in accordance with her value. Of course, one may feign shock at this statement, but it is not at all surprising once all the pretense is shed. Let us dive deeper into one of the examples presented above - honor killing. .A female puts disgrace and dishonour upon the name of her family. What should be done by her? Of course, there are diverse manners of treating such females for that type of act. Some family may just ignore it and let her carry on without any change in her behaviour and attitude. Some other family, however, takes her for the damage and harm she inflicted on the family by, saying, evicting her from the family and severing all kinds of contact with her, discarding the trash from their family in order to keep the rest of the family clean. There can be another family that takes a more fundamental approach to solving the problem by having their family members simply kill her in order to punish her for the sin she committed against the honour and dignity against the family. Now, is there any "misogyny" in the three differences ways in which those 3 families deal with their female member? No, there is not. All three of the families show the fact that there are different, diverse approaches to solving a female problem. There is no "objectively" correct or incorrect approach. There exists only subjectively "right or wrong" or "better or worse" approach determined by the subjective value judgment and conscience depending on the family. Each family just decided which manner is better among the available options, and simply applied it to the female. And when different families decide to take different approaches, diversity ensues. So where is the "misogyny" element, the element of burning hatred against females? There is not. Sure, some may object this by trying to argue that "killing her is illegal. The 3rd family killed her, so that family must have hated her. And hatred of her is misogyny." This kind of sophistry may tempt a person of lazy, naive mind, but still sophistry is sophistry. It matters not whether is 'legal" or "illegal" at all. The manner each family took in such given cases was based on their subjective judgment in value, morality, ethics and so on. Each family simply picked the best option in accordance with their conscience. Note here is that no human law ever can supersede the very conscience of a human actor that performs an act. All those human laws are nothing but sounds and writings of human words upon confronting physical, concrete human actions that bring about physical, concrete changes. So basically, "human laws" are simply irrelevant in those given contexts. Moreover, another problem of human laws is that it is only arbitrary and have utterly weak basis. Let us review once again the case of honour-killing. Is it right or wrong to honour-kill a female? Who is to say what is right or wrong? Should the ruling of the winning side be enforced on the other side? And should the defeated side follow the ruling they disagree with? If we take the mantra that "everybody is equal", then there is absolutely no grounds for one side to force the other to succumb, and the other side has absolutely no reason to submit to the other side. When everybody is equal, nobody succumbs to another without consent and against conscience. There is no place in the given cases for human laws to intervene, rendering the whole "it's illegal" argument means nothing at all. Another fun subject - domestic violence, particularly a husband beating up his wife. The principle of "different and diverse manners of treating females" also applies in this case. In House A, the husband does not beat up his wife. OK, that is of course one of many manners in treating females. In House B, the husband beats his wife. OK, that is another of diverse manners of treating females. Again, where is misogyny in this? Neither. Each husband utilizes his subjective value judgment and conscience in order to decide which manner to apply to his wife. Again, as in the honour-killing case, this does not have any objective standard that can judge which is right or wrong, and who's to say what is right or wrong. The only fact is that there are different manners of treating females that results in the diversity of manners related to handling women. Stoning a woman to death somehow seems like an inflammatory topic for many people. Why? There is no cause for alarm at all, Logic? As stated above. The key concepts are the same : differences and diversity arising from those differences clearly exist all over the world, and that must be recognized and respected. At the core of blabbering "misogyny", there lies the notion that refuses to respect the diversity of manners regarding handling or solving female problems. Those that utter "misogyny" either are a) too ignorant to recognize the truth that there are many different ways of treating females, and many different human beings adopt different manners of treating females, or b) are aware of the truth, but simply unwilling to accept it. The very obvious fact that morality, ethics and conscience can be demonstrated differently depending on cultures or individuals is completely lost to those brainless pseudohumans that try to pursue that everybody in the world should treat females in the same way, regardless of race, sex, religion and so on, and people who do not treat women in accordance with some certain standard are barbarian neanderthals that have not properly evolved. In the western world, those what I call "pseudohumans" are mostly conservatives that do not pretend to be liberals and conservatives that pretend to be liberals, especially when subjects regarding how Islam and muslim cultures treat females. All sorts of "misogyny" is spewed out of their hollow oral cavity from their empty brains, without ever realizing the differences and diversity that enrich human cultures around the world. And, as always, they end their verbal attacks on different cultures a) with frantic screams of phobia and b) a hint of colonialism that they should invade those countries (again) to rectify such diver practices and "liberate" the people over there. There is no "misogyny". There are only different and diverse manners in treating females, and from that we have such rich diversity all over the world. We must respect those differences and embrace the diversity. Relating to morality, ethics or conscience, no absolute standard exists and no human law is relevant. I have my manner of treating females, you have yours, and they have theirs. It is not about "misogyny" or other meaningless words. It is not about who is right or who is wrong, what is good or what is bad. Rather, it is about recognizing the differences we have between ourselves, respecting them, and embracing the ensuing diversity that we live by.