America should have the ACA. Also known as " Obamacare".

RebuttalsBased on my opponents arguments he seems to have not realized that this law was enacted nearly 4 years ago. So I will re-state many of my previous arguments because my opponent had failed to address them. Instead, he argues about what the law was projected for and the requirements the ACA was intended to meet. This law had failed to meet many of those requirements in the last 4 years. Not only was this law a disaster but it doesn’t fit Americas free market system. “You said big corporations were laying off the workers. The ACA has a plan for this. The exchanges were established to create less expensive quality healthcare.” The plan of the ACA resulted in workers being layed off. You see many businesses fail to financially meet the ACA standards. So you’re saying that the ACA has a plan for a mess that same law very much created? Doesn’t make sense. Is Obama going to make another unconstitutional executive order to expand this law? Supreme court will shut it down. “This will help the lower income families by providing them with quality insurance. They may pay more but these plans provide more. Quality is the keyword here.” Cheap healthcare is not quality. Nothing is cheap and quality. Name one thing. In a capitalist country you get what you pay for.When plans are subsidized and there is no competition, the quality of products/services will greatly reduce. Adam Smith used the metaphor of The Invisible Hand to show how competition can produce quality products. This economic theory has proven itself over the years throughout our capitalist system. “ Individuals try to maximize their own good (and become wealthier), and by doing so, through trade and entrepreneurship, society as a whole is better off.” This applies to all forms business, corporations, private insurance companies, etc. I would prefer the private sector to take control of the national healthcare because traditionally they are the best at it. By competing they will force themselves to lower their prices. In a free market system people only buy the cheapest and most quality. If competition is eliminated there is no incentive to produce quality goods or services. This is why i think the private sector should run our healthcare. Greed is not necessarily a bad thing. Obamacare has proven that the central government can’t take control of the national healthcare. This is not quality care. Many individuals, despite requirements, are losing their coverage due to illness or injuries. One mother of 49 who was diagnosed with a rare cancer, had to pay for her own medications because Obamacare doesn’t cover certain kinds of medications. She already had insurance that covered all her medical costs including medications to help treat this illness but she lost that coverage due to Obamacare restrictions. This is simply unacceptable. “Obamacare is subsidized because of the government.” That’s the mistake. This law is as liberal as I gets with some conservative extensions. Members of Obamacare are subsidized through the private sector. The people who actually work and pay for their own insurance have a hike in premiums so private insurance companies can meet ACA standards. Now, because of this, many people are losing their coverage. “Also think about those who buy coverage in their 20's and keep it after 65.” Do you see that happening? No. ConclusionI like the concept of the ACA but I would rather have government stay out of our national healthcare. The ACA should have just been conformed of regulations upon private insurance companies, like they cannot charge more because of gender, age or pre- existing conditions. Regulations of that nature. Our federal government should regulate not run out healthcare system. The ACA has proven itself ineffective in providing quality healthcare to its members. The ACA is the very reason why our government should not run our healthcare.References http://www.lifenews.com... http://www.foxnews.com... http://www.investopedia.com...