Creationism has made verified predictions.

Prediction 1: The Earth is under 10,000 years old. This is as of yet unproven, although there are supporting theories that make testable predictions. However, I would like to note that a RELIABLE eyewitness beats forensic evidence, every time. The Bible claims to be an eyewitness and reliable, but that is not the topic of this debate, and I will leave this prediction alone. Prediction 2: Using a creationist model, creationist physicist Russell Humphreys predicted (1984) [1] five things. 1 and 2. The upcoming Voyager 2 encounters with Uranus and Neptune should show planetary magnetic moments less than the k = 1.0 limit: 8.2 x 1025 J/T for Uranus and 9.7 x 1025J/T for Neptune. 3. We would not expect Pluto to have any appreciable magnetic moment at present. 4. Mercury's decay rate is so rapid that some future probe could detect it fairly soon. In 1990 the planet's magnetic moment should be 1.8 percent smaller than its 1975 value. 5. Older igneous rocks from Mercury or Mars should have natural remanent magnetization, as the Moon's rocks do. These predictions have since been verified, and as the predicted values are far, about 100,000 times, from "mainstream" scientific predictions, it qualifies. Prediction 3: Magnetic reversals should be found in rocks known to have cooled in days or weeks. For example, in a thin lava flow, the outside would cool first, and record earth"s magnetic field in one direction; the inside would cool later, and record the field in another direction. [2] This was subsequently proven, thus denying the long ages required for evolution. Prediction 4: Monotheism would come before polytheism, since God made the world and all knew God in the past. This has been verified by archaeological evidence [3], showing that indeed this is the case. Prediction 5: If the biblical Flood really happened as the Bible describes, then we would expect the geologic results of that Flood to show their cataclysmic origin, the result of processes operating on rates and intensities far beyond those operating in the present, and they would be operating on a regional scale. [4] This is evident in the geological records. Prediction 6: ReMine predicted that evolutionary ideology is bound to naturalism and simply "accommodates" all evidence to fit reworked evolutionary models, thus showing that it is not falsifiable and therefore not scientific according to science philosopher Carl Popper"s primary criterion. He even predicted that evolutionists would increasingly resort to such lateral transfer. [5] This we see becoming more and more widespread in "scientific" circles. Prediction 7: This is based on the same reference as the previous, but about the creationist "orchard" model for the diversity of life. Mainstream scientists are now beginning to accept some points of the orchard, although creationism is still rejected. Prediction 8: Creationist have long predicted [6] that animals can travel large distances over water on vegetation mats. This has since been proven (See reference 18 of reference 6). Models whose predictions were falsified have been discarded, like the thin dust layer on the moon, etc. Of course, creationists do not make many predictions. That is generally left to evolutionists. 1. . http://www.creationresearch.org... 2. . http://creation.com... 3. . http://creation.com... 4. . http://creation.com... 5. . http://creation.com...; ReMine, W. J. , The Biotic Message: Evolution versus Message Theory, St Paul Science, St Paul, Minnesota, 1993. 6. . http://creation.com...