THBT Parent should have obligation to send their children to inclusion school

Ok, I will start the second round. Now, I want to rebut all points that con said in the first round with my arguments. 1. About moral obligation. Parents had obligation in moral to fulfill their children's need. Beside for fulfill need like eat and drink, they also had obligation for their children in social and education. They should give education for their children to bring them life harmony in the real environment with normal people in order to can mingle in that environment as good people. And with this, also make them more can handle their shortage because they usually life in the real environment that make them aware that they must can put the good things in right place and decrease to do the bad things. Parents also had obligation to fulfill needs : needs of love, needs to feel safe, needs to self esteem, needs to feel freedom, etc. And don't forget that the children can't always depend to their parents. Parents also should let them and guide them live independent to be people in the real environment as people that had the same right with normal people. And inclusion school is also support to actualize the moral obligation it self with so many good activities between normal student with student with 'special needs'. So, to send their children who has disabilities to inclusion school is needed because with this, their child will more confident to stare the real world, no more feel discriminative (because as we know they are different but that we must realize that they have same right like us). About legal obligation. The children who has 'special needs' had rights : accessibility and safety in transportation, architecture, and the physical environment; equal opportunities in independent living, education, and housing; and freedom from abuse, neglect, and violations of patients' rights.[1] Effective civil rights legislation is sought in order to secure these opportunities and rights.[1][2] http://en.wikipedia.org.... The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities offers sufficient standards of protection for the civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights of persons with disabilities on the basis of inclusion, equality and non-discrimination. It makes clear that persons with disabilities are entitled to live independently in their communities, to make their own choices and to play an active role in society. http://www.ohchr.org... So, like what I said before, as parent they should do their job with fulfill the children needs and rights. The children who has 'special needs' had rights : accessibility and safety in transportation, architecture, and the physical environment; equal opportunities in independent living, education, and housing; and freedom from abuse, neglect, and violations of patients' rights.[1] Effective civil rights legislation is sought in order to secure these opportunities and rights.[1][2] http://en.wikipedia.org.... The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities offers sufficient standards of protection for the civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights of persons with disabilities on the basis of inclusion, equality and non-discrimination. It makes clear that persons with disabilities are entitled to live independently in their communities, to make their own choices and to play an active role in society. http://www.ohchr.org... So many countries like Indonesia, Vietnam, etc has regulation about send children who has 'special needs' to inclusion school. So, it's very clear that parent had obligation (moral and legal) to send their children to inclusion school. 2. Con said that "grouping of students there are some major differences which would require different qualities of care or assistance." I think, con didn"t understand about mechanism study in inclusion school for student who has "special needs". So, I will explain it for my lovely readers and especially for con. First about regular school it self. Actually, I already define it in first round but con still didn't understand about this. Like what I said in 1st round, in regular school student who has 'special needs' not all in the school with normal people. They also get special education and treatments after school hour with special teacher. About treatments inclusion school never forget it. So, they have 2 curriculum in school (curriculum like normal people and special curriculum for them). Teacher who teach there, must comply all provisions from inclusion school it self. So, don't think too much about this and don't worry because teachers there certainly know about procedure to teach them. What con worries before about 'teacher' is answered. Second, regular school only accept 2 students with 'special needs' each classroom. It means that atmosphere for learning will do well and so, don't again make them as a reason "they interfere normal people to learn". well, what con said about asperger syndrome, autism and mental retardation, is answered. They will get special treatment after school hour. And in regular school it self, only accept 2 students with 'special needs' and it's not give bad influence in learn hour for normal people. Now, I will give you cases in Vietnam. Vietnam is example that inclusion school is more effective and good for children with 'special needs' than special school. They prove that children with disabilities can join with normal people, build good relationship, be more independent in that environment and people there also can more tolerance about that 'different' thing. Vietnam was success to realize 'education for all'. System inclusion education considered is system education that humane. Because in inclusion school they get teach about knowing, understanding and learning usually with that different. Salamanca declaration also gave 'policy guidance' that able as reference for other countries in the world for build system inclusion education. http://majalahdiffa.com... So, what con said about his experience in his school is very funny. Why? Because he just talk about his experience in his environment without tell us about what school is that, where he live, when he meet them, who are them (what kind of disability?) and more. I mean, his experience is not strong. Who's care about your experience because I don't know that is true or not, that's your imagine or not. And please remember again my limitation is in premiere school NOT in senior high school. Why I limit there? Because, premiere school is the first stage to build good characters for children and also education that give in this level not hard. I mean, they only learn about basically. So, con is just talk about assuming without prove it in the fact and con NEVER give us the solution. Con just rebut my arguments without tell the solution. The last thing is what I said in the 1st is totally logic. And about what I said in 1st round about justification, I'm not use totally my emotional there. What arguments I said there is logic and based on the fact. Well, essentially is con can't rebut my arguments in justification because I believe that everyone especially con totally agree with my arguments about justification. That's enough from me in 2nd round. Thank you.