My opponent will not say Hello to me.

Preponderance of Evidence, Pt 1 of 2:"This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence." http://dictionary.law.com...A. "you cannot prove that it was actually YOU, my opponent, ShadowKingStudios"1. The recording was posted by the account holder listed as Con in this debate. Account holder is ShadowKing Studios2. This text was written by the account holder listed as Con in this debate. Account holder is ShadowKing Studios3. The following reliable sources were posted by the account holder listed as Con in this debate. Account holder is ShadowKing Studios4. https://www.dropbox.com...This link is a recording by Con aka ShadowKing Studios5. The above link, as with the Hello greeting, are recordings from the same Dropbox account owned by name holder Brando Littles aka ShadowKing Studios.6. https://www.dropbox.com...http://brandolittlescopyrighted.blogspot.com...These two links, posted by Con, aka ShadowKing Studios are from Brando Littles aka ShadowKing Studios. One link is taken from my personal blogspot that bears my name.7. https://www.youtube.com...This backlink, from another debate, was posted by me, ShadowKing Studios.8. Following the YouTube video back to its origins you will come to the Youtube channel of ShadowKing Studios.9. Youtube channel proves it is ran by ShadowKing Studios. On the profile page you can see the exact same profile pic used up in the corner for Con. https://www.youtube.com...10. Comparing the voices, gives you matching audio evidence of the same person, me. 11. Right click, copy image location of my DDO pic, paste it in Google Images, search. You will get results pointing to DDO & Youtube.12. Type in Google Web "ShadowKing Studios" a link to my Vimeo channel pops up. The Logo Sequences of my videos bear witness to this account holder named ShadowKing Studios.B.Since you failed to lay down a criteria on which to judge the preponderance of proof, and decide to invent it as you proceed, voters are know bound to judge a victor based on their inherent intelligence of logic & reason and not by any standard you might choose to throw at their feet since, again, you failed to lay a guiding foundation in the beginning. Therefore, based on Pt. 1 of this preponderance of evidence, simple use of logic reveals that I, Con aka ShadowKing Studios, in an attempt to prove you wrong "my opponent will not say hello to me" recorded an audio track of my voice to lay as evidence of saying Hello, Evannn to Pro, aka Evannn. Furthermore, I, ShadowKing Studios, debunking your R2 claim of "you cannot prove that it was actually YOU, my opponent, ShadowKingStudios" have listed several audio tracks of my voice which also bear evidence of my profile picture linked to my DDO profile bearing my name Brando Littles, my dropbox account which also bears my name Brando Littles, my Youtube account which bears BOTH names ShadowKing Studios & Brando Littles, and my personal blog that bears my name Brando Littles & material linked to my moniker ShadowKing Studios. The common denominators that testify to reasonable logic of my veracity are the names linked to Con: ShadowKing Studios, Brando Littles, and the profile pic.The simple fact that you, Pro, bear the name Evannn, instigating a debate of saying hello to you, logically testifies that ANY person accepting the role as Con, recording a vocal audio greeting to this debate's Pro named Evannn, intended for their post (in this case mine) to be directly addressing their debate opponent labeled Pro, named Evannn. C.The only burden of proof you laid down when instigating this debate as Pro is "your opponent" aka Con "will not say Hello to me". Say implies audible words. Teamed with "your opponent" the Con, it does not constitute the "saying" MUST be Con's own voice but only that Con must say--present an audible greeting of--hello. Me implies "Pro" and does not mandate the definition of "Evann" but generally "Con". Saying "Evann" in the greeting was simply an added bonus. I, Con, have meet the burden of proof you presented. Your rebuttals are now reduced to semantics & rhetoric.