The Christian bible and god are responsible for the presence of morality

My opponent, in the face of the solid facts I provided in response to his claims, has failed to provide a rebuttal. The crux of Pro's argument has taken many forms - I have been misrepresented and my opponent has attempted to slander my character. This amounts to nothing more than intellectual dishonesty and treacherous debating. Impressive rhetoric is used but it does not detract from the situation - the pillars of my opponents argument lie in waste. Yes my opponent did attempt to validate his argument by referencing the heinous acts taking place in christian minority countries but a grave error was made - Pro staggering neglected to look properly at christian majority countries and to countries where the dominant religion is not christianity but instead another. As a result, an incomplete picture was provided by Pro, one which can never satisfy the burden of proof when arguing for the proposition that the christian faith and bible are responsible for morality. I see it as prudent to take lead and move on to the matter of the christian bible. It is true that this holy book provides some examples of what the average man would deem to be acts of morality but it is absolutely vital to realize that any good deed mentioned in the bible could also be achieved through purely secular means. I therefore challenge my opponent to provide an example of a good act which could not be achieved in spite of the absence of christianity and its bible. I believe the bible is not the paragon of moral virtue my opponent would likely have you believe it is. What moral lesson are we to take from a book in which over 2 million people die at the hands of the creator, the word of this god himself, a divinely inspired work. This figure is by no means an exaggeration - the bible gives numbers - 70'000 killed for David's sin, 42 children killed by bears sent from god for mocking Elijah, 24'000 Jews who followed Baal killed, all the Midianite's killed except for the 32'000 virgin girls spared, 500'000 Israelites who killed each other at the command of God. And the list goes on... This does not include all of humanity (except of course for Noah, his family and the animals) who were wiped out by the great flood, or the 65 entire cities sacked for which the death tolls were not mentioned in the bible, the so called source of morality. My opponent may perhaps state that these are only allegories, but were he to do so I would ask him by what standard he is able to deem a story from the bible fact or allegory. There are just over 600 commandments in the bible - these are laws decreed by god himself - these laws are rigid. They are to be obeyed by all. I would therefore firstly ask my opponent if he is aware of this fact. I would also ask if my opponent follows each one of these commandments himself - does he keep the Sabbath day holy, does he abstain from eating shellfish? Would my opponent stone his child to death for being unruly or take a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath to the edge of the city to participate in his stoning to death? The point I am making should be obvious - the bible and christianity is not needed for moral guidance and it's complete absence would not leave a person morally void. Were I accused of being wrong in my proposition I would ask why reports do not flood in daily, telling the world of yet another child stoned to death in American for being unruly, or a man killed for working on the Sabbath, for America after all is one of the most christian majority countries in the world. As a final point and an exercise in thought, I wish to ask my opponent several questions - does Pro hold raping and killing to be utterly wrong like I, an atheist, do? Did Pro rape and kill before becoming a believer in god? And finally, were it proved undeniably that god was not real, would Pro then start to rape and kill? The answers to these questions will speak volumes. An honest answer to these questions will obliterate my opponents argument.