BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
make cools guns

.........b29;#########b29; .....b29;#############b29; ...b29;###############b29; ..b29;#################b29;..................b29;###b29; ..b29;##################b29;..........b29;#########b29; ....b29;#################b29;......b29;#############b29; .......b29;################b29;..b29;###############b29; .........b29;################b29;################b29; ...........b29; #######Put This On Your Page#####b29; ..............b29;##If You Love Someone#########b29; ................b29;##########################b29; ..................b29;#######################b29; ....................b29;####################b29; ......................b29;#################b29; ........................b29;##############b29; ...........................b29;###########b29; .............................b29;#########b29; ...............................b29;#######b29; .................................b29;#####b29; ...................................b29;###b29; .....................................b29;#b29; .......................................b29; .......................................b29; .....................................b29; ...................................b29; .................................b29; ..............................b29; ............................b29; .........................b29; ......................b29; ..................b29; .............b29; .........b29; ......b29; ....b29; ......b29;......................b29;...b29; ..........b29;.............b29;............b29; ..............b29;.....b29;...................b29; ...................b29;.....................b29; ................b29;......b29;..............b29; ..............b29;.............b29;....b29; .............b29; ...........b29; ..........b29; .........b29; .........b29; ..........b29; ..............b29; ...................b29; ..........................b29; ...............................b29; .................................b29; .................................b29; ..............................b29; .........................b29; ..................b29; ...........b29; .....b29; ...b29; .b29;.............................b29;....b29; b29;..........................b29;...........b29; .b29;......................b29;................b29; ..b29;...................b29;..................b29; ...b29;....................................b29; .....b29;...............................b29; ........b29;.........................b29; ...........b29;...................b29; ..............b29;..............b29; ..................b29;.......b29; .....................b29;..b29; .......................b29;
make cools guns

. . . . . _______________________¶¶¶¶ _______________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ___________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶_¶¶¶ _________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ _______¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶_______¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶¶¶ _____¶¶¶¶¶¶¶______________________¶¶ _____¶¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶________________¶ ____¶¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶¶1¶¶¶ ____¶¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶111¶¶ ____¶¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶¶1¶¶¶ ____¶¶¶¶¶¶____¶¶1¶¶ _____¶¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶1¶¶ _____¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶_¶¶¶¶¶ ______¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ _______¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ _________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ __¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ____¶¶¶¶11111111111111111¶¶¶¶¶ _______¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶__¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶__¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ _____________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ____________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ___________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶_¶¶ __________¶¶¶¶¶¶_1_¶¶ __________¶¶¶¶¶¶_1_¶¶ __________¶¶¶¶¶¶_1_¶¶ __________¶¶¶¶¶¶_1_¶¶ __________¶¶¶¶¶¶_1_¶¶ ___________¶¶¶¶¶_1_¶¶ ____________¶¶¶¶_1_¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶¶_¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶_1_¶¶__¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ _____________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ____________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ___________¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶ ___________¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶ ___________¶¶¶¶¶___¶¶ ____________¶¶¶¶___¶¶ ____________¶¶¶¶___¶¶ ______________¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶___¶¶¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶___¶¶_¶¶¶¶¶ ______________¶¶___¶¶___¶¶¶¶ _______________¶¶_¶¶_____¶¶¶ ________________¶¶¶______¶¶¶ _________________¶_______¶¶
make cools guns

`08;`08;`08;۞`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08; ]`04;`04;`04;`04;`04;`04;`04;`04;`04;`04;`04;`04;`03; `02;`04;`05;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`05;`04;`03;`02; I`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;`08;]. a01;X57;`50;X57;`50;X57;`50;X57;`50;X57;`50;X57;`50;X57;a00;...
make cools guns

. . . . . ---------------------|=|-------------------/+*+\\------------------/####\\-----------------/&*&*&\\----------------|*********|-----------------\\$*$*$*/------------------\\####/-------------------|*****|___------------.__...|*****|~----|-----------..|....|}-|*****|-----------..|....|}-|*****|________------------/.....|=|*****|--------------|----------_|.....|..'|*****|________|----------L|.....|=|*&*&|------------\\..../--|******|-------------|..|---|******|------------/....\\--|******|-----------/.......\\.|******|-----------|........|;|******|-----------|___.|;|******|--------------------|####|--------------------\\******/---------------------|*$*$|---------------------|*$*$|---------------------|*$*$|---------------------|*$*$|--------------------/******\\-------------------/********\\------------------(_______)
Gun rights

Have you ever looked up how many people have died in 'accidental' car crashes? You aren't banning cars, all things have the potential to be dangerous or used as a weapon. Not only do guns save lives,but it is your constitutional right. 'I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them. --George Mason 'Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence...from the hour the pilgrims landed to present day,events, occurrences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable...the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil. ----- George Washington First President of the United States of America In conclusion I think that guns rights are good for safety and freedom.
Gun rights

Yet people still are shown in studies to die. People can't handle the responsibility. It is very hard to keep a weapon from the prying eyes and curious hands of a little child, even if you lock the weapon up. Not only that children can't handle the weapon--research found that 8% of unintentional shooting deaths resulted from shots fired by children younger than 6 years old[1]--in general, people of all ages can't handle guns. States with the highest gun ownership levels had, on average, 7 times the rate of unintentional firearms deaths compared to those with the lowest gun ownership levels. [2]That's not all--people don't even lock their weapons up. 33% of US households have a gun[3], and 1/2 of them don't even lock up their guns--40% of which contain children under the age of 18. [4]These children can't handle the responsibility of not touching or accidentally shooting with a gun, and neither can the parents. It is time to strip people of their gun rights; they simply can't handle the situation. [1] Ibid[2] http://www.drgo.us...[3] http://www.people-press.org...;[question e.F2][4] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
Your choice out of some of my favorite topics

You are right we are not debating the Big Bang Theory but rather the theory of evolution. You speak of the grey bugs/black bugs and why evolution can occur or rather why it does. These reasons however are micro evolution not macro. Yes there are black Labradors along with brown and white and even more there are huskies to poodles to pit bulls and so on. All these species of dog did have one common ancestor, a dog. Mutations are not evolutions and the idea of one species turning into another species is absurd. In order for a species to somehow evolve into another still requires a decision and how does the species properly come to be? If only one new animal comes from parents of another and live with its parents species then how do more of the new species survive? Would it not just mate with the old species and start to give off spring of the old species? And if this is true what made evolution to choose humans to be intelligent and not like the other animals giving us the ability of language and the power to write them down and just be a higher intelligence than all other animals. God told Moses atop of Mt Sinai that he created the world and the whole universe in just 7 days. Now tell me why couldn't of God just straight up told Moses 3500 years ago that yes great blobs of dust through gravity made fusion and new elements exploding and creating stars and planets including earth and then through millions of years humans came to be through evolution and here we are. Moses would either fall asleep and probably not comprehend this knowledge so God told him what he needed to know and said the appropriate answer for the appropriate time. God saying 7 days implemented the idea of Sabbath and back then in ancient times to have a whole day off of hard labor every week was a great idea and very intriguing point to stay orthodox. God really didn't spend much time on creation but was more focused on making good rules for the ancient Jews and how they should lead by example and become the beacon of the world. The system also according fits just like evolution. Sedimentary rock layers on all continents prove that once earth was covered with water. Fact of the matter is Creationism or Evolutionism God made it happen clear and simple.
Your choice out of some of my favorite topics

Thanks again and I will be using common sense, logic and Books from the KJV Bible to prove my point. Appropriate sites will be listed. In order to debate the topic Creationism v Evolutionism and taking the side of the first you must first talk about God. To think that a God created all things just because is stupid and illogical but if someone also came to me and said literally nothing or now more recently big blobs if dust and debris created everything, is also just as stupid and illogical. Now of course people of both side say that proof through observation and history and yes both do. Some major questions for you I would liked answers in the next round please: How did the dust and debris come into existence? What made gravity cause this dust and debris foil into so such a small space exploded faster than light and still is expanding today? Also from this dust and debris has made complex drugs like nicotine and morphine to creating not only numbers but equations and short cuts? If the dust was just dust how did it make literally everything, plasma, gas, liquid, and solid. But we are talking Evolutionism v Creationism. Problem with the Theory: In order for macro-evolution or any evolution for that matter something must be making a biological decision to act upon changing to survive better in an environment. Animals cannot wish to be a better to way to survive in their habitat like humans can. So again more questions: What is making this logical decision to adapt biologically with no want factor coming from the brain? Since humans can wish and figure the wants they need to survive in an environment why are we not evolving at a faster rate than animals and much slower than micro-organisms? That something that is toying with life, adapting His creation is God. God can use evolution to adapt what he has made like improving or modifying a minecraft castle. God has chosen to kill of animals like the dinosaurs. Evolution and creation both can be true seeing that both cannot be completely disproved or proven. Also both can be done by God and God alone. I am also stopping my arguments short see ya next round.
Your choice out of some of my favorite topics

Marvelous! Thank you for accepting! Now, let's begin. Proof for evolution can be found in many different forms, the first of which, is simple fossilized evidence. There are many examples of a gradual change in bone structure of different organisms throughout history. A prominent and obvious example is horse (specifically, their legs and hooves): http://chem.tufts.edu... (If you scroll down, you can see the change in the leg of the horse) Humans have 96% of genes in common with chimpanzees, 90% with cats, and 80% with cows. This doesn't mean that we came from cows or cats, but it does show that we had a common ancestor. http://evolutionfaq.com... These similarities can even be observed in human embryos. In early stages of development, humans have gills. They do not actually function, but slits form on the side of the embryo's throat which later close up again. Humans also have webbed hands and feet when in early stages of development. http://evolutionfaq.com... A common anti-evolution argument is that we cannot observe it happening now, which is false. An experiment has been conducted on E. Coli over the course many years, and has managed to greatly increase the heat resistance of the bacteria. It is actually not so far-fetched to believe that this experimental group of E. Coli may eventually become a thermo-philic species. http://www.technology-transfer-blog.com... In summary, all of the above shows that organisms change over time, and if enough time passes, it is logical that they change so much to the point where they can be categorized as another organism entirely. I'm sorry for the short argument and I shall expand on it next Round. On to my opponent.
Your choice out of some of my favorite topics

It has been too long since I have struck fear into the hearts of my enemies! Mwahaha! Please choose one of the following topics, in parentheses is my position on the topic, so you will be arguing opposite: Evolution vs. Creationism (Evolution) Women in Combat (Con) US military vs. Russian military (Russian) 9/11 was an inside job (Pro) Russian T-90 vs. American Abrams (T-90) AK-47 vs. M16 (AK-47) Death Penalty (Con) In Round One, no arguments, just state which of the above you would like to debate. Also please confirm your position on the topic. No new arguments in the last round. So! Let's begin! Any questions can be answered in the comments.
Resolved: Guns should be prohibited.

My opponent still makes claims without warrants, and has based his case on everything but facts.He states that we have not always had the right to keep and bear arms however, the second amendment was written as part of the Constitution's Bill of Rights in 1791 [1]. Even before, then we still had such rights when the English still ruled us [2]. So, I suggest he stops with this "we as a nation haven't always had gun rights" because it is nothing but nonsense. Furthermore, he has apparently hasn't even looked over the list of injustices that our government has already committed against us even though it is democratic, it still doesn't end the threat of a tyrranical government and rights to guns is the the only thing stopping us from being overwelmed by complete tyrrany and the establisment of dictatorship. I would like to encourage my opponent to persue a education in both grammar, history, and logic. He even disregards the studies conducted that I have given in both our country and abroad. He says that if there is no guns then there wont be no need for protection from criminals however, it isn't that simple. When guns are restricted the same things to it as drugs and when alcohol was prohibited, criminals still aquire them illegally and the law abiding citizens are the ones who are effected because they have no way of defending themselves. We see this in almost every study conducted (especially the ones THAT I ALREADY POSTED), when firearms are restricted, violent crimes increase. My opponent says criminals don't always attack unarmed citizens, and that is correct but then again those citizens with guns are able to defend themselves and their property. My opponent ends by giving by committing on my two quotes. I will refute it nonsense invividually.1. My opponent fails at his first attack on it. By enslavement he was refering to the governmnet doing to us what the Soviet Union did to it's population, and that is making them slaves, taking away their liberty, firearms defend our liberty. And then he says the militia is the governmnet military and this is false. Back when our country was founded we had both an Army and a militia [3]. A militia is a volunteer force that is made up of civilians, while the military is made up of volunteers made up of people loyal to the government. These are far different concepts.2. And my second quote was the justification for allowing guns. It defended us from unjust government, and anyone who has read a history book knows the first thing unjust governments do right before they enslave their population to its will (takes away the means of defense, guns)...I will now await my opponent's response. [1]http://en.wikipedia.org...[2]http://en.wikipedia.org...[3]http://www.historyisfun.org...;
An atheist president would NOT be okay.

Rebuttals:"It is stated in the pledge of allegiance "One nation under god." If we have an atheist president, who's to say that he/she will actually have us as one nation under god?" The Pledge of Allegiance is not the standard that the Founding Fathers set for people who want to become President.The only reason that the Pledge has "under God" in it is because it was added in 1954 in response to the "godless Commies."[1][2][3]I remind you, The Constitution is the one document we should be paying attention to. Not one of the words in that document are "God" or "Jesus." The Pledge of Allegiance is actually unconstitutional by blending church and state. "If they already don't believe in god, are they potentially able to give us the freedom we deserve?"Being atheist doesn't mean we're all copies of Stalin or Mao. It doesn't mean we don't have morals. Also, god and freedom are not intertwined. You can have one without the other."We could end up being punished because this so called "atheist" believes that since god "took" one of their close family members that we should be "taken" as well."Is this really what you have? None of my close family/friends have died, and if they did, I wouldn't blame the big man upstairs. I would also not take it out on over 314 million people. Obviously if this atheist has been elected President, he/she has proven themselves to be mentally stable. Also, why is atheist in quotes? I'm pretty sure when I say I'm atheist I'm not joking."Do we really want to trust someone who already won't believe in 'one nation under god'?"God doesn't play a role in morality. I'm not going to slaughter all Americans for my deep hatred of someone I don't think exists."The United States is mostly all Christians who believe in god."So? Does that mean that only a Christian should be President?My opponent has yet to fill her burden of proof, but I will still present an arguments that she could make.1. MoralityI've mentioned this a bit. You don't need to believe in God to have morality. I haven't killed anyone, yet I'm an atheist. If anything, Christians are the ones without morals. Just look at your holy book!"Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every women that hath known a man by lying with him. But all the women children that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." Numbers 31:17-31:18"If a man meets a virgin who is not betrothed, and seizes her and lies with her, and they are found, then the man who lay with her shall give to the father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days." Deuteronomy 22:8-22:9Just filled with good, clean morals for the whole family!
An atheist president would NOT be okay.

Reason #1: It is stated in the pledge of allegiance "One nation under god." If we have an atheist president, who's to say that he/she will actually have us as one nation under god? If they already don't believe in god, are they potentially able to give us the freedom we deserve? We could end up being punished because this so called "atheist" believes that since god "took" one of their close family members that we should be "taken" as well. Do we really want to trust someone who already won't believe in "one nation under god"? Reason #2: The United States is mostly all Christians who believe in god. Where do you think the "One nation under god" came from con side? I'm positive that an atheist wrote that line... aren't you? (Sarcasm) I mean really? I'm not saying that the whole United States is made up of all Christians, but I AM saying that the United States has their religion built up of all religions that believe in some kind of god/leader. I'm quite anxious to know why you think an atheist can be president and control his/her people.
Resolved: The average intelligence of a Fox News Anchor is = or < the average intelligence of a rock

I would like to conclude the debate with a rebuttal of my opponent’s points, as well as a final clarification and review of my own. 1) “Con attributes the moving of the ship to the sand since the rocks weren’t seen. If however I do show the rocks were moving the ship, then the rocks would be seen as intelligent, not the sand.” My point here was not simply that what cannot be seen cannot be moving the ship (which is not necessarily true), but that Pro had absolutely no justification for the claim that rocks were moving the ship. 2) “That is an outright and blatant lie. I never said ‘The crabs moved the ship, loads of them.’” I am afraid Pro misunderstood this significant point. For the sake of voters, however, let me clarify. The quote “The crabs moved the ship, loads of them,” is not a quote from Pro, but a quote from the owner of the video that Pro cited. Please refer to the comment section of that video. 3) “They were not extreme scenarios, they were the first things that came up when I researched the names of the anchors on youtube…” “I cannot waste character space arguing that Halloween doesnt turn kids into liberals contrary to what Hannity claimed.” Pro does not believe that it is necessary to back up his judgment of fox news anchors with evidence, and while this may be merely a personal whim, Pro has failed to actually prove anything within this debate. 4) “Being wrong =/= intelligence. If I said that crab people are trying to use Paul Ryan to drive us into debt so that they could then kill us when we're weak that wouldnt = intelligence.” Voters, the debate boils down to this: just because one lacks intelligence does not mean that they are unable to function. If rocks could attempt to use Paul Ryan to drive us into debt they would have an intelligence greater than if they never functioned at all.