Nazi Germany lost World War II because they invaded Russia.

RebuttalsPro seems to be extremely convinced that the Nazi lost World war II because they betrayed ¨The Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Pact¨ or because they invaded Russia. However I do admit that it was in fact the dumbest move ever made in tactics, I do applaud Hitler for coming to his senses, because Hitler intended to dominate the world, in which he cannot accomplish because of Russia. Simply put Russia and the Nazi Germany eventually would fight against one another for world domination.dTherefore, I make the claim that the Nazi Germany did not lose World War II JUST because they did not follow their pact with Russia, but rather Nazy Germany lost World War II because they missed tons of winning opportunity.Ex.1. Many specialist believe that during the early-mid stages of World War II, a large amount of winning opportunities had opened up in the South of the Mediterranean shore. That Hitler should've ordered the capture of Cairo instead of attempting to capture Loundon. 2. Hitler's greatest mistake of the war (by many specialists) was that he was always so persistent of decimating the Soviet Union rather than following his objectives, which Hitler could've cleared by capitalizing on winning opportunities.3. ¨Germany had about 10 million troops in WW2. Their main allies (Japan, Italy, etc.) came up to about 10 million more. So they have about 20 million manpower. [3] The USA and Britain combined have 16 million, France did have 5 million but were taking over (not including them), and India had 2 million coming. It is about 20 million axis versus 18 million allies. When Germany invaded Russia, Russia added 12 million MORE to the Allies stack, which means about 20 million axis versus 30 million allies. It makes absolutely no sense to invade Russia.¨ Pro obviously backsup his claim through mathematical terms, but this mathematical idea can also come in play in favor of my claim. Back to my previous claim: Hitler did not capitalize on winning opptertunities. The fact that Hitler FOCUSED heavily on eliminating the Soviet Union (Russia) in a sense it was a smart idea, but Hitler didn't execute it correctly. However according pro's calculations the Nazi Germany had 10 million troops, but pro failed to specifically split how many, the USA and Britain had separately in troops. Therefore I will assume either both USA and Britain have 8 million troops or USA has more troops than Britain or vice-versa. Either way one side must have less troops than Nazi Germany. Tactics that Nazi Germany should've done to capitalize on winning opportunities was to separate Britain's Royal Navy from the Suez Canal within the Mediterranean sea. Therefore The Nazi from there could've simply taken Afganhistan and Iraq with much ease and ceasing the US's highly oil producers, which would force the US or an ally to to recapture them; then if the Nazi Germany were smart they would manipulate the anticipated raid.Once the Nazi Germany takes control of a highly valued producer for the US, then actions will be forced to be made. With much time on their hands the Nazi Germany should've focused on other European countries such as France or Britain, instead of the Soviet, which was clearly another mistake that I've mentioned before. In conclusion, Nazi Germany lost World war II because they could not capitalize on winning opportunities not because they invaded Russia. It's like a game of chess. If you lose your queen, your strongest piece in the game, your chances of winning is decreased but isn't decided, but if you make plenty of mistakes, then those mistakes will stack and your chances of losing will GREATLY increase.Cites: http://bevinalexander.com...http://www.thesaurus.com...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.2worldwar2.com...http://www.historynet.com...http://www.theguardian.com... Alt+M Alt+N