Theory of evolution is valid

You state Point 1) This is the point where I will bring up the "randomness" issue. There is a certain amount of chance when discussing the theory of evolution; that is why we use punnet squares to determine the chance of offspring acquiring a specific genotype for instance. However there is a difference between evolutionary process incorporating the chance of something occurring and that process being random. Rebuttal: Randomness concerning genotype, is the natural order of things, as coded in organisms DNA, and required by the biological process of reproduction, as are the expression of those genes, and phenotypes. This is a completely different subject, than the non pre-existing biological data, especially with specific concern to evolution out of species. " DNA mutations which are acquired rather than inherited, such as cancer mutations, are not part of the individual's genotype; hence, scientists and physicians sometimes talk for example about the (geno)type of a particular cancer, that is the genotype of the disease as distinct from the diseased." https://en.wikipedia.org... The specificity of the organization and interaction DNA, its processes and parts is composed of, is so spot on, we can map it as if it were a language unto itself, and some people do argue this point. If a computer programs html, or, other code, is off by even a single letter, or mark of punctuation, the entire program ceases to work. This is in fact a truth about computer coding, which is eerily similar to what we see when the DNA code is affected by things which disrupt it, such as handicaps, and diseases like cancer as I described earlier, the outcome being death or improper function, rather than improvement, and further supports entropy, leading to disorder, not finely tuned perfection such as we see reflected in life. 2. You state: Because droughts are so frequent, there are of course gaps in our records, and especially as drought indexes are a fairly recent phenomena, knowing when and where a drought took place, can be fickle. However, that does not mean to state that we cannot know that droughts have occurred in the past. This statement shows that.. Yes, the reliability of information concerning climate on species is very limited, and even knowing when and where certain climate changes occurred can be fickle at best.. For instance, a drought which could kill off many within a species, can be as short as only a few months, which makes reliable analysis of changes within species from hundreds or even thousands or millions of years ago impossible. 3. You state: Also, your point about droughts on the Galapagos leading to a thinning out of the population, leaving only thicker beaks, is silly. Rebuttal: This article, shows that you are simply wrong. https://ncse.com... This article shows the findings of continued observance of Dawins Finches, in much more recent times, and specifically speaks to droughts effects on the population. 4. You state: "What Con fails to realize is that many differing categories of eyes exist.." Rebuttal: This has no bearing on the argument of the complexity, of each different type of eye. Even Darwin stated, ""To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivance for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree." Also, no progression of eye designs from simple to complex have been produced in the fossil world, however, "Although the "Cambrian animals were not the same species as exist today " nearly all the modern phyla had rapidly come into existence, fully equipped with eyes as far as can be told from the fossils" and during the Cambrian explosion.." http://creation.com... In other words, evidence points to the conclusion that though there are different types of eyes within different species, the eye itself was fully functional in all its complexity, at its inception.