The Bible proves that Jesus was not God!

The whole reason I am on this site is for the sake of being challenged in order for my knowledge to grow. I thank my opponent for his firm arguments and excellent debating skills. Let me make 3 points before addressing the last issues and closing.1. My opponent's thesis was, "The Bible proves that Jesus is not God. " Yet, if my opponent does not think the Bible to be a credible source, then he does not truly believe the Bible can prove anything. He couldn't say "The Bible says" because there is no direct verse that says He is not God. It would have been best for him to say "The Bible implies. " However, that has not been his argument so he has essentially made his own thesis impossible for himself to prove to himself if the source he is using carries no weight in his mind. I am sorry but you should have never said "proves. "2. My opponent criticizes me for using other verse but never explained why his references were any better than mine. In all of his examples he uses implied truth more than I do. Therefore, like any book, he should not take out the parts that fit with his view and ignore the rest. I used other verse because I believe the Bible should be understood as one whole book. It is not wrong for me to then quote another part from the book. 3. My opponent is an atheist, and will therefore have a bent towards trying to disprove God's existence, just as I am a Christian who is bent towards trying to prove God's existence. In the end, we are both relying on faith because God's existence is scientifically and perhaps even logically unknowable. We may discuss likelihood but we cannot discuss as if it were fact in this sort of debate. Therefore, voters should focus on our skill in debating our two thesis' not on whatever bias. Pro's thesis "The Bible proves that Jesus is not God"Con's thesis "The Bible does not disprove Jesus as God. "1) I have dealt with this passage. I brought up the trinity because I, along with many others, believe that the Bible cannot be understood apart from a Trinitarian lens. As far as the Father being "greater," you never defined what you thought greater meant while I suggested maybe it has less to do with value and more to do with vastness. It does not disprove Jesus' deity in the slightest.2) Christ did not know when he was coming back on this earth. I can accept that. God is all-knowing. There seems to be a contradiction, but as I have suggested Christ "emptied" Himself and therefore withheld His own knowledge from Himself. A task which only an all-powerful God could do.3) Jesus called himself THE (exclusive) Son (singular) of man (I did research and this means one man (Greek). Psalms warns against princes (plural) who may be referred to as a (non-restrictive) son (one of plural) of man (I did research and this means mankind (Hebrew). I do not think these two verse have to do with each other, but Psalms is dealing with those who try to discredit God while Matthew is Jesus referring to himself. 4) I did address this you just do not like how I did. In the trinity, the Father "gave" the Son His authority and power. This is a picture of how the trinity works, not implying Jesus is not an equal part of God. 5) Jesus did not need to claim He was God. He worked through actions more than words. When the world turned dark on the cross, when He changed the water into wine, and when He rose again from the dead. I have given you a biblical reference and you discount based on your belief, not because there is a flaw in my argument. In conclusion, while the Bible can be hard to understand sometimes I do not see a way that one could logically state that the Bible disproves Jesus as God. I believe my opponent has failed to do so. Thanks to all who read! Happy voting! :) (More sources for fun). http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.spurgeon.org...;