Russia/USSR has created more devastating weapons than ___________

"Tsar Bomba was the most powerful atomic explosion, but it was merely an experiment produced by the USSR. Fat Man approximately killed 30,000-80,000 people in that city," Yes, it was an experiment and it was successful. Would you rather have had the bomb dropped on a city, killing tens of thousands? The point is, the weapon is more devastating and does much more damage than the Fat Man. "The KBP AGS-17 may have a slightly longer firing range" 700 meters is not a slightly longer firing range. The KBP AGS-17 can fire about 35%-40% farther than the XM25. "This is possibly the largest and heaviest howitzer produced by the American forces. " In the American forces, yes, but not in the world. As mentioned, the Soviet "Pion" is the most powerful, and can fire 15 miles farther than the M1 Howitzer. Now, to my final round of weaponry. 1. S-400- This is a Russian surface-to-air missile system. It has a range of up to 60 km in radius and 30 km of altitude. One of the most impressive features of this machine is that it can SIMULTANEOUSLY engage 36 targets and simultaneously guide 72 missiles. . http://en.wikipedia.org...(SAM) 2. AT-13 (Saxhorn-2) - This is a Russian anti-tank missile system. Used successfully against Israeli Merkava tanks, it is a very effective weapon against any armored vehicle. It is relatively light and can be operated by a single person. The AT-13 presents a 1.5 km range, which is more than enough to safely eliminate almost any armored target. Its armor penetration is calculated to be about 900-950 mm. . http://www.militaryfactory.com... . http://en.wikipedia.org... 3. T-90MS - Most modern Russian main battle tank. Far superior to the American M1A2 Abrams. Let's compare them side by side: _______________Abrams____________T-90 Cost:________$6.21 million____$2.8-$4.3 million T-90 is much cheaper. Weight:_______62 tons___________48 tons T-90 is lighter, making it more maneuverable. Crew:____________4_________________3 Abrams has a bigger crew because the Abrams does NOT have an auto-loader. Abrams still uses a human loader, which is 20th century technology as well as simply making reloading slower and much less consistent than the T-90, which has an auto-loader. Armor:______600-800 mm__1,150-1,350 mm This does not mean that the armor is literally 800 mm thick, it is relative to a certain kind of ammo. It is evident that the T-90 has far superior armor. Gun:___________120 mm________125 mm There is almost no difference here BUT the T-90 is capable of firing a laser-guided missile out of its main gun which has a range of 5.5 km! Operational Range:_425 km____550-700 km The T-90 is much more fuel efficient and can travel much farther on a single tank of fuel. Speed:___________67 km/h_______72 km/h The T-90 is faster. The T-90 is superior to the Abrams in virtually every respect. It is a great tank and very modernized defenses such as the Shtora-1 and ERA. (ERA decreases penetration of APFSDS rounds by over 50%, and Shtora-1 minimizes the chance of being hit by enemy anti-tank guided weapons. ) . http://www.military-today.com... . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://en.wikipedia.org...