Who should be the next POTUS? Trump(Pro)......Clinton(Con)

The final round is for rebuttals to rebuttals in Round 3 and concluding statements. Con may not refute any rebuttals I make in this round as it will be unfair. Rebuttal 1: Con: "You claimed that by politically incorrect, Mr. Trump will be able to solve of our nations must difficult problems. I could not disagree more, by being as rude as he has been he turns off people who will need to follow him. Mr. Trump has not only scared away members of his party, citizens of the United States, and people in foreign nations.The leaders of some of the United States greatest allies think that Mr. Trump is hateful, irresponsible, and so on. If Mr. Trump can not get the support of our nation's allies or are citizens if he carries on." It's a fact that most Americans agree with his political incorrectness, as I stated in my 1st Contention. Con's second sentence is completely vague and flawed. You can disagree all you want, but a fact remains a fact. Some of the people he has turned off are following him including Governors Rick Perry and Chris Christie, who were former competitors.[1] The fact is that all the people that Trump turned off realized that the people want him and as a result, they now support him. As for the citizens, Donald Trump has broken the GOP record for most votes in a primary.[2] And just for the record, most Americans agree that Hillary Clinton should be in jail.[3] This is a more than enough reason why Trump should win. She's a criminal in the eyes of most Americans. Con's 1st Source contains numerous biased accounts from foreign leaders that support Clinton. There are two Saudi officials and one UAE official that criticize Trump. The UAE and Saudi Arabia how donated money to Hillary Clinton's campaign as I stated in Round 3. There are also numerous Mexican officials that criticize Trump. These Mexican officials obviously do not want their country to pay for the wall, which Mr. Trump has proposed. There are also officials from various NATO countries like Turkey, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, England, Spain, Germany, and Albania. Trump has called repeatedly called for these countries to start paying up on defense as the United States pays the most.[4] Con's source is biased against Trump, and therefore I disregard this source as a whole. Trump already has support from people like me, and Russia's President Putin has praised Trump for his talent. With a Trump Presidency, relations between Russia and the United States can continue to thaw.[5] Rebuttal 2: Con: "I would also like to note here: Mr. Trump is exhibiting many of the behaviors that parents raise their children to avoid. Mr. Trump is a name caller, a bully, and untrustworthy. He has taken ever opportunity possible to bash anyone in his sight. Whether it a protester, a politician, a head of state, a member of the US government, or any other human being. He also does not hold the office of President of the United States with much respect at all. He and several other republicans, keep referring to President Obama as "Barak Obama" or "Obama". Whether Mr. Trump likes him or not, he has to hold the office in high enough respect to refer to him as the President." Con's entire paragraph does not include one source to prove his claims, but nevertheless, I will disprove their accusations. Trump starts calling names, because he is provoked in doing so. For example, during the Iowa Caucuses, Ted Cruz's campaign said that Ben Carson had dropped out when he hadn't. They lied to voters and that's where the name Lyin' Ted came from. Cruz took Evangelical votes from Carson, and as a result Trump lost Iowa.[6] As for a bully and untrustworthy, how exactly is Trump a bully? Is it because he is telling the truth about people. If you really knew anything about trustworthiness, you wouldn't be on Hillary Clinton's side, as she lied to the people about her emails, lied about her emails under oath in front of Congress. (Evidence stated in Round 3) He bashes protesters because they are burning the American flag and harming Trump supporters. [7]He bashes politicians and state officials for their corruptness in Washington D.C. Con's comment about Trump not holding respect for the office of the President of the United States is completely contradictory. Why would Trump be running for The President's Office if he had no respect for it? What does it matter to you if Republicans call Obama by saying Obama or Barack Obama? I supported Obama in 2008 and 2012, and I call him Obama. This is completely irrelevant to the topic we are currently debating. The Office of the President is completely different. Rebuttal 3: I have absolutely no respect for Hillary Clinton. She has lied countless times, she's hypocritical on the issues of LGBT and Women's Rights (Evidence in Round 3), she simply puts the lives of Americans in danger. The Office is completely different from the person. I respect the office, I don't respect Hillary. Your statistic represents Canada, a country completely different from the United States, and a country that doesn't play as big of a role in the War on Terror compared to countries like the United States, Turkey, and France. America is seen as a threat because it continues to bomb ISIS, while Canada has ended bombing runs against ISIS[8] ISIS has openly announced a kill list against America unlike Canada.[9] This proves that America is more likely to be attacked than Canada. Rebuttal 4: Con: "I litterlay have no words to desribe how ridulus the wall is. It will effect the enviorment, cause boerder disputs, and make the US seem like a 1900s isolationist country again. There is no way Mexico is going to pay for the wall either." At this point, I feel like Con has given up. Con fails to provide any sources of how it will effect the environment, how it will cause border disputes, and how it week seem like an isolationist country. Not to mention their grammar fails horribly. But, again, I will argue the points. The environment that you love so much is causing job losses. Hillary has specifically said she is going to put coal miners out of work.[10] And let's say that is does affect the environment. There's nothing we can do as China isn't doing anything to help with the Environment Crisis that Democrats have so longly viewed upon. As for border disputes, what's going to happen? Is Mexico gonna send its military to our border? And Mexico will have to pay for the wall, or it will cost their economy. Trump proposes stopping all illegal wages being sent to Mexico which number around 24 billion USD. This number alone is in the margin of the post of the wall, which is about 17 billion USD. For more details, go to https://www.donaldjtrump.com... and look also look at the Immigration Reform Page as well. Closing Statement: I, Pro have refuted all of Con's arguments and rebuttals up to this. Con fails to provide sources proving accusations against Mr. Trump. And one of Con's sources was simply biased against Mr. Trump. I have also proven that Hillary Clinton wouldn't make a good President, due to her email scandal and failed leadership. Not to mention how big of a hypocrite she is on the issue of Women's Rights and LGBT Rights. I would like the voters and Con to ponder upon this question: Why does Donald Trump want to become POTUS? He already has enough money to live a couple of lifetimes. He's already popular through his show "The Apprentice." The answer is, that he is running for America, Americans, Children, Police Officers, and our Veterans. For all of the reasons, I urge a Pro ballot for this debate. I hope I have changed your mind Con...... Sources: [1]http://www.theatlantic.com... [2]http://www.politifact.com... [3]http://www.cnn.com... [4]http://money.cnn.com... [5]https://www.theguardian.com... [6]http://time.com... [7]http://www.cnn.com... [8]http://www.militarytimes.com... [9]https://www.bostonglobe.com... [10]https://m.youtube.com...