Gay men should pay higher car insurance premiums than straight men

>>I agree with my opponent in so much as gay men share a dangerous lack of driving skills with women, that's undeniably true. To illustrate this, ask yourself this: how many Formula 1 drivers have there ever been that are either women or gay? The answer is: none. Not one, not a single one, ever in the entire history of the sport. Is that because the world governing body of motorsport, The Fï¿½dï¿½ration Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) is institutionally sexist and homophobic? No, as part of their sporting code, they do not have a clause that stipulates:<< I feel this works for my argument. I proved in the first round that men temd to be erratic and fast drivers, and since there are only male drivers in Formula 1, I think this re-affirms the point why straight men should be charged higher insurance premiums. >>No, the fact is that straight men are the most skillful drivers and, therefore, the most able to control their vehicle safely in the event of a emergency. << However, men are more likely to put themselves in such a situation. Homosexuals may have their minds on flowers and puppies, these are calming thoughts. Straight men however, have their thoughts on the footy match their missing out on, and their woman, which makes them speed uncontrollably home. >>My opponent went on to suggest that while gay men risk AIDS every time they have unprotected, er. .. shenanigans with another man, straight men risk conceiving a child every time they have sex with a woman without taking proper precautions. The difference is, of course, a straight man can get the fetus aborted but the gay man is stuck with AIDS for the rest of his (drastically curtailed) life. Never mind that though, the point is that all men, gay and straight, are naturally risk takers so any discount that may be offered to women in recognition of their cautious nature should not be (and is not) extended to men of a homosexual persuasion. << My opponent has forgotten straight men can catch STD's through the aforementioned shenanigans, as well as children, and, even AIDS. AIDs can happen on the highway, not just up the slip roads (metaphorically speaking! ). Even if men are taking the highway, slippery conditions can make them veer onto the slip roads unexpectedly, increasing the chance of AIDS. >>Now to the million dollar question about bi-sexual men. I have thought long and hard about this and concluded that there is no such thing as bi-sexual men. I mean, once a bloke has had his first go on a proper fit bird, why would he consider another man sexually attractive? No, it doesn't make sense. When was the last time you had dinner with a vegetarian who ordered watercress soup for starters but had fillet steak (rare) for the main course? No, "bi-sexual" men might not be as camp as openly gay men, but they are still gay and insurers should charge them extra accordingly. << Comparing eating a meal to sexual preference is, well, inaccurate. People eat both salad and meat. In the world of food, the majority of people would be bisexual. However, this is untrue in sexual preference. Given that, there are multiple reasons why a man might want to go for another man after having a go at a fit bird: 1) The bird was useless in bed. 2) One too many pints. 3) The bird in question was your ex and your getting back at her by going after her brother/ father. However, the truth is that bi-sexuals exist: . http://www.bisexual.org...