This House Believes that Hell exists

Ah yes. I agree that the explanation on the part of Hinduism is very intriguing and though it is not new to me, it still remains as a hell (no pun intended) of a lot better explanation for where Hell is, which is on Earth itself. It truly is a much better explanation, though I do not agree with the part about God as stated in your link. But onto my rebuttals. I shall keep them plain and simple. Though interesting, the 'Hell' of Hinduism is not the debate which we are having right now. The definition states that Hell, in the context of this debate, is the place where the souls of bad people are believed to be punished after death, especially in the Christian and Muslim religions. In other words, eternal damnation. You know, burning in lakes of fires and that sort of thing. I urge you to stick to the definition of the debate itself, since the definition states that the souls of bad people are punished after death. You must first prove the existence of a soul, which you can't cos there are not enough rounds in the debate (I'm sorry), and then you must prove that Hell itself is a place which exists and it is separate from Earth, as stated by Christian and Muslim religions. As I have mentioned before, your reference to the Hindu religion is intriguing and it is of great intellectual value. However, it isn't really relevant to the debate as stipulated by the definition of Hell. Reincarnation, in the sense you have just stated, is much more interesting than me being reincarnated literally into a Dog in my next life or a Cow or a Pig. It has been scientifically proven that even if you are dead, the atoms which make up your body still exist and will be converted from one form to another, thus ensuring that you continue to 'live' on in different forms, thus proving Reincarnation. However, Reincarnation, in that sense, is really metaphorical and not literal in the sense of 'I'm a human now and in my next life, my soul will be transformed into a Dog because I did something wrong in this life.'. We don't exactly know how the atoms of our body are going to change from one form to another, after we die and our bodies decompose. So, our 'Reincarnation' does not really depend upon any of the deeds which we did in this life. It's a natural process and since it is clear that natural processes don't actually care what happens to us, our deeds make no difference whatever in our 'reincarnation'. However intriguing this topic is, though, it is not related to the Hell as stated in the definition for this debate. Under normal circumstances, your explanation would suffice in a metaphorical sense of 'Hell' but then, in this debate, we're talking about whether the literal sense of 'Hell' even exists. The definition for this debate also does state that Hell is a place where the souls of bad people are punished. If we argue on the basis of the Hindu Hell, which is basically on Earth itself, are we all, therefore souls? But that's a fallacy, considering that souls are immaterial and therefore, they are not subject to the Laws of Physics. But we are clearly subject to the Laws of Physics, which clearly proves that we are material and physical, which also proves that we cannot be souls. With all due respect, I also hope or, dare I say, pray that you do not mean it when you say that African women who have their genitals mutilated deserve that kind of treatment. I believe that it is a little bit sadistic, if you don't mind me saying. Again, we are debating on the Hell which is stated by Muslim and Christian religions and any other religion which shares their beliefs about Hell and the concept of eternal damnation. Please follow the definition in your rebuttal of my arguments in this round. Thank you and please note that in your reply, you must refute the arguments which I posted against the motion itself. There should be no direct rebuttals to my rebuttals against your arguments. Rebuttals against my arguments should be the key content in your replies. Round 4 should be a short summary of your arguments and should not include any new arguments. Just clearing this up just in case. I shall await your rebuttals and I hope you have a nice day.