After/assuming this debate concludes, the contender ought to go on a date with Logical-Master

"We can't necessarily "know" per se, but we can reasonably conclude what may indeed occur." We both enjoy argueing, so is it truly bad that we would both argue? No. While it may seem odd to other people that in our relationship we argue for fun, but in the relationship we would enjoy the arguments. Not only that, but because we do agree on pretty much all of the major issues we wouldn't get into any fearsome or relationship detrimental arguments ------>RE:"Actually, I am going to a high school, but 6 of my 7 current classes are college level. So we could in fact 'help each other out' and anyways, it is just a simple date we are worrying about currently not in our entire relationship." ----->RE: "Thus, it is most important that we consider our compatibility rather than simply rely on the method that revolves around "not knowing without trying."" Our relationship could still be very good whether or not we deem it to be here. The best way to decide if we are compatible is meeting and going on one or more dates. ----->RE: "Ladies and gentleman, my opponent has just provided reasons as to why we should not merely date each on the basis of the idea that "we cannot know without trying". We must determine whether or not we are both interested and and whether or not there is possibility that it could work out between the two of us. Given that my job is to negate the resolution, my answer to my opponent's question is no as my job is to argue against their being possibility." Stating that there is no possibility is rather harsh, and their has to be no possibility for us to not ever go on one date. And for several reasons we have possibility: a) We both enjoy debate, and would enjoy arguing together about non-serious issues, ones that would not progress into serious arguments or fights. b) I enjoy your traits that make you more individualistic c) As of right now, a date would allow us to truly meet, date, and see for ourselves whether or not we could be a good couple ----->RE: "I'm not shallow enough to care, if I like you that's all that matters, I could care less about what my friends say.' "Still, in answer to the above, I'd say that whether or not my opponent would care about what others thought of her, my "out of the ordinary" mannerisms could prove detrimental to her if our relationship were to progress after dating. This is not merely based on what friends may think of her, but what people of financial/social power may think (employers typically). The thing about our careers in the US is that most of them judge "presentation" more than anything else and my opponent having a partner who isn't exactly in the norm when it comes to mannerisms could in fact damage her career wise (at very least, in terms of getting a promotion)." If you are so worried about affecting my career, you could simply not meet my employers. No, I wouldn't be 'hiding' you from them, but if you fear ruining my career, you could hide from them yourself. I would not force you, because if our relationship grew that much I would be proud of you :D ================================ INTP vs INTJ ================================ INTJ:http://www.personalitypage.com...... INTP: http://www.personalitypage.com...... Ladies and gentleman, if you would be so kind as to take a gander at each of these pages, you shall see for yourself that both my opponent and I do not make that good of a couple. Don't believe me? First, lets explore the weakness to both of our personality types: INTJ: -Not naturally good at expressing feelings and affections -Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times INTP: -Not naturally in tune with others' feelings; slow to respond to emotional needs -Not naturally good at expressing their own feelings and emotions "It may be true that both my opponent and I would be able to satisfy our intellectual needs, but given the above affects concerning the weaknesses of our personalities, our relationship would be most likely be pretty rocky on an emotional level (which surpasses the previous need)." Actually, this could cause the opposite effect. We are both bad at dealing with emotions, but we are both bad at expressing them. Therefore, this would cause the problems to cancel each other out, and we would have no emotional problems at all. Neither of us would want to talk about or express our emotions. Not only that, but every relationship is going to have weaknesses, but we must not forget our possible strengths: INTP: Generally laid-back and easy-going, willing to defer to their mates INTJ: Tendency to believe that they're always right If you are going to believe you are always right, that matches with my personality because in my personality I am laid back, willing to let you win, and happy to differ in opinions with you. INTP: Do not feel personally threatened by conflict or criticism INTJ: Not threatened by conflict or criticism We match :P I could find more and will if the need arises. I would, however like to share this quote from the website: INTJ: "They're likely to leave relationships which aren't working for them" If this doesn't work out, we are obviously not going to be stuck in some awful relationship forever. "Two well-developed individuals of any type can enjoy a healthy relationship." Even this website agrees, our personalities are not of upmost importance. We could still easily have a good healthy relationship and the truth is, the only way to know for absolutely sure is to have a date. Not only that, but we could have easily been misdiagnosed. You said it yourself, your personality has changed with the different tests you have taken ======================================== "PRO prefers those who are 'Rugged and doing whatever needs to be done, no matter how it needs to be done" ======================================== Actually, your slightly twisting this. See you asked me what kind of 'bad boys' I liked. In response I said that as far as the 'bad boy' look went I disliked men who were bad people, but within the confines of bad boys I preferred a a bad boy figured man to be 'willing to do what needs to be done, not matter how it needs to be done' I never once said this was my overall preference in men nor did I lead you to believe I like rugged bad boys over any other kind of person. "I'm not quite sure what is meant by rugged, so I'll leave that alone for now and request that she provide an example." Well naturally all women are physically drawn to rugged men ;) But once again, I prefer 'rugged looking BAD BOYS." Not men altogether, just considering bad boys that is how I feel. "Though in terms of doing whatever needs to be done no matter what my methods are, I am most certainly not the kind of person who lives by such mindset as I do not believe that the ends justify the means. Evidence of this fact can be shown in this debate: http://www.debate.org...; Honestly, I don't know why you brought this up. You aren't a bad boy and yet you asked me what kind of bad boy I liked? It would have been more understanding if you asked if I liked 'bad boys' over regular men, but you didn't. And you didn't bring into the debate the fact that you asked me specifics on bad boys, not my general idea of bad boys over other types of men.