Donald Trump is not a racist

There are several issues with my opponents reasoning that I would like to point out.1) Pro states that "Racism has always been defined as discriminating against people on account of their race ... despite what the U.N. says" There are two issues with this statement:i) Pro provides no evidence to support this argument.ii) Pro does not say who the authoritative source is that made that definition, not to mention why that source would have more authority than a coalition of 193 world state representatives.2) Pro states "If the majority decide that the sky is red and the moon is made of cheese, it doesn't matter, the sky is still blue and the moon is still made of rock". Pro's argument is only valid if word meanings are constant. However, time has proven that they are variable. For example, if you said to an English-speaker 300 years ago that the word "gay" refers to homosexuality they would have disagreed with you just as much as if you called the sky red. The word "gay" didn't start referring to homosexuality until the 1970's [4], yet it is now an accepted definition of the word because the majority of English speakers accept it as such. 300 years from now, if English-speakers decide to use the word "cheese" to refer to what we now call "moon rocks", then that will be an accepted definition of "cheese", and the statement "the moon is made of cheese" will change from false to true.3) Pro states that Donald is "discriminating against the Muslim ideology, and NOT the Muslim 'race'".Ideas make an ideology. People make a race. Donald Trump's statement on preventing Muslim immigration proposes a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States". [1 above] The policy does not speak of banning an ideology. To do so would be to ban any Islamic texts, teachings, or symbols. (This would, of course, still be discrimination, and one may argue even worse).What Donald's policy does ban is people. Muslim people. All Muslim people, regardless of how strong or how radical their beliefs are. Donald's policy discriminates against a race.And just so there is no confusion, Merriam-Webster defines race as "a class or kind of people unified by shared interests, habits, or characteristics" [5] Muslims are a race. 4) Pro argues that religious groups can't be racial groups.Judaism is a religion. It is not a race. However, anti-Semitism is a widely and commonly accepted form of racism. [2 above]5) Regardless of any arguments I have given, Pro has not proven the debate objectiveThe topic of this debate is "Donald Trump is not a racist". Pro holds the burden of proof, and must, through sound and valid argument, prove that Donald is not a racist. I do not need to prove that Trump is a racist (for that is not the subject of debate), but instead just need to show that Pro has not proven Trump is not a racist.Even if it were impossible for someone to be racist against Muslims, Pro has not proven that Trump is not racist against other peoples, African Americans, Native Americans, Asians, Hispanics, etc... Until Pro proves that Donald is not racist at all, Pro has not proven Pro's point, and has not fulfilled the minimum requirement for Pro to succeed at this debate.4. http://www.etymonline.com...5. http://www.merriam-webster.com...