you are more evil than I am crazy

Hello everyone. Before I proceed to rip apart my good friend's argument, I just wanted to provide everyone with a little background information. Me and crazypenguin have been good friends for a few years, and us being us, we loved to tease each other about the most random things. It was just for fun, and recently, we have begun teasing each other about a subject which is very controversial and is a inside joke for me and him. If you don't understand the topic, there is a reason. However, for the purpose of this debate, I'm going to explain the topic is a way that should be easiest for everyone voting. You are more evil than I am crazy is the exact wording of this topic. "You" would be me. "I" would be my opponent. When he says that I am more evil that he is crazy, he means that if you were to measure my "evilness" and his "crazy-ness", and you got a number (hypothetically speaking), then whoever had the higher number would be the one who is either more evil than the other is crazy (if I was to lose this debate) or one is more crazy than the other is evil (if I were to win this debate). Hopefully this will alleviate any questions you might have, but if there is still confusion, feel free to leave a message on this debate. Now to the debate itself: I know this will sound repetitive because I just said much of what I am about to say. The topic states that "You" (burningpuppies101) are more evil that "I"(crazypenguin) am crazy. So what my opponent has to prove is the following: Burningpuppies101 is more evil than Crazypenguin is crazy. What I have to prove is the following: Burningpuppies101 is NOT more evil than Crazypenguin is crazy. So at a first glance, it may see, as though I have to prove that Crazypenguin is more crazy than I am evil. However, I will not do that seeing as that is impossible. My stance only states that I have to prove that I am not more evil than Crazypenguin is crazy. So I just have to disprove my opponents statements. I don't have to prove my own, I just have to disprove his arguments to win. However, my opponent has not provided any statements with which I can refute, so I will just have to forward some of my arguments for my case. Note however, that even though I am presenting arguments, my job is not to prove my case. My job is to disprove my opponents case, and if in doing so I present my own arguments, so be it. 1. There is no way to prove beyond a reasonable doubt as to the fact that I am more evil than he is crazy. There is no way to actually measure evil-ness and crazy-ness, because we do not have a standard with which to measure. Therefore, any argument my opponent puts forth "measuring" my evil is false. However, this is the only way with which to prove this topic right, so in a nutshell, I just kind of won this debate. 2. I want to submit some definitions from Merriam Webster(a source I believe we can all agree is a very good and reliable source) evil 1 a: morally reprehensible : sinful , wicked b: arising from actual or imputed bad character or conduct 2 a:archaic : inferior b: causing discomfort or repulsion : offensive c: disagreeable 3 a: causing harm : pernicious b: marked by misfortune : unlucky To clarify the definition above, I offer the following definitions: reprehensible: (side note: I had to paraphrase the definition a little since there was a trail of words I had to follow before I got the definition) 1. to be able to voice disapproval of Morally reprehensible: 1. to be able to voice disapproval of something. The disapproval is usually based on a moral ground. Pernicious: 1.highly injurous and destructive Harm: 1 : physical or mental damage : injury Damage: 1: loss or harm resulting from injury to person, property, or reputation Below is a definition for crazy: crazy 1 a: full of cracks or flaws : unsound b: crooked , askew 2 a: mad , insane b (1): impractical (2): erratic c: being out of the ordinary : unusual 3 a: distracted with desire or excitement b: absurdly fond : infatuated c: passionately preoccupied : obsessed 3. This is my third argument, not to be confused for another definition. I'm going to disprove anything my opponent might have to say about my being evil. Evil's first definition says that evil is something that is morally reprehensible. I have not done anything that would deserve to be morally reprehesive. Even if I have, my opponent has no way to prove any claim that he makes. Evil's second definition. The first part doesn't really make sense(if anyone can explain it, please do in the message section.) So I'll go with the second part, which means that I cause discomfort or repulsion in those around me. Again, like the first definition, there is no way to prove that this is true. Also, this is not true. If you choose to believe me(which you don't, and probably shouldn't), I'm going to claim that I am in the middle of a library typing this argument, and all around me are people, and none of them are expressing any sign that I am causing them discomfort or repulsion. In fact, there is someone withing 2 feet of me looking over my shoulder as I write this argument, and he has shown no sign that I am causing him ANY discomfort or repulsion. Evil's third definition. I have never harmed somone in my life (harm has been defined above), and evil if I have, there is no way to prove it. Also, when you say someone has harmed you, you do not mean someone has tickled you. When you talk about someone harming another, you mean that one has been hurt much more than just tickling someone. 4. Normally, I would go on to prove that my opponent is crazy, and I would probably follow the above format for doing so. However, there is nothing I can say in this argument what would objectively prove that what I say is true, so I'm not even going to try. Conclusion: My opponent has not way to prove any claims he makes about me being evil. I do not have to prove that He is more crazy than I am evil. I only have to prove that I am not more evil than he is crazy. In otherwords, I just have to disprove his arguments. I don't need to present any arguments of my own to prove that he is more crazy than I am evil. Instead, I just presented arguments that will show that I am not more evil than he is crazy. My opponent has NO WAY TO PROVE ANYTHING HE SAYS IS TRUE (I know I just repeated myself, but I wanted to make sure you knew.) Thank You