Abortion is morally wrong.

Well I thank the opposition for such a speedy reply, but I am seriously questioning some of the provided rebuttals. And just putting a little [9] (with no visible sources) after completely ridiculous facts does not make them correct. COUNTER REBUTTALS #1 My Opponent: "The fetus has a very high possibility of becoming a human, so would you kill it before it has the chance to?" You, sir, failed to see this one little point in my argument: "anyone who considers abortion to be murder because the fetus will eventually become a human MUST agree that anytime a woman has her period she is killing a baby, because she is loosing her egg." So tell me Con, is a woman killing a baby before it has a chance to live whenever she has her period and looses an egg? Well, you must think so if you think "we are killing fetuses before them have a chance to live." #2 "My opponent's argument is that women have the right to choose. However, does the future-human get to choose? Think about it, if you had the choice to get killed and not get a chance to live or live and become a human, what would you choose? Normal people would want to live! It's a bit hypocritical that Pro-Choice people want women to be able to choose, while denying the choice of life." The reason we are not giving fetuses a choice is because they would be incapable of choosing if we happened to ask them. For that matter, they are incapable of feeling pain, thinking, digestion, or self awareness. Not only that, but before 20 weeks, they are practically in a sedation period. Needless to say, they are not human beings. And saying that they shouldn't be removed because they "would be humans" is like saying that having a period is killing a baby, because your egg "would be a human." #3 "Of the 200,000 women who were forcibly raped, one-third were either too old or too young to get pregnant. [9] so right of the bat scratch 1/3. Women are capable of being fertilized only 3 days (perhaps 5) out of a 30-day month. [9] So right there take of more because chances are you will not be raped in that 3 day period. Only half of assailants penetrate her body and/or deposit sperm in her vagina [9] take off some there. Fifteen percent of men are sterile [9] so some rapists do not have sperm, lower that number Fifteen percent of non-surgically sterilized women are naturally sterile [9] The number of possibly women pregnant from rape is below 5,000 from the original 200,000 The average couple takes 5-9 months to get pregnant. [9] SO according to the source the original 200,000 lowers to 450. Most do not become pregnant." Where, may I ask, are you getting these "facts?" "Of the 200,000 women who were forcibly raped, one-third were either too old or too young to get pregnant." Who the heck told you that? http://www.rainn.org.... There are the real facts. "Women are capable of being fertilized only 3 days (perhaps 5) out of a 30-day month." While the 3-5 day ovulation period is the most common time, you can be fertilized any time of the month, even during period. See: http://www.positive.org... "Fifteen percent of men are sterile" No, no no. 15% of COUPLES are INFERTILE. You seriously mixed up your facts. http://www.thedoctorwillseeyounow.com... ADDITIONAL ARGUMENTS This is a smaller point not included in my last post. POINT 1) There are many methods of birth control in today's world. You can attempt natural birth control, by only having sex during ovulation. Or condoms can be used to prevent the flow of sperm. Also, pills such as daily pills or morning after supplements can eliminate the zygote. However, what if the girl ovulates at an unexpected time? Or what if your condom breaks, like some 4% of them do? Maybe the pill doesn't work either, as the chances of failure are always there? Abortion is a last resort for many people. A common "misconception" (no pun intended!) is that pro-choice people love abortion. Abortion is not a great thing, but in situations like teen pregnancies, it can be necessary. Thank you. I look forward to closing arguments.