Capitalism is better than Socialism.

Before I begin, I just want to say how such a great this debate is! I really enjoy this and good luck! Direct Response to CON: Point 1: "Survival of oneself as well as another ... a good ground of proof of alternative systemic approaches." Here, CON clearly is misinterpreting my arguments. I don't necessarily believe that the 'survival of the fittest' mentality is one that applies to the theory of supply and demand (on capitalism at all). This would imply unfair advantages that are insurmountable at all - which is not what I will advocate for. Now that this is clear, it seems as though we both agree that cooperation in society helps to a certain degree. Yes this is true, but the only way to achieve this in its purest and most effective form, Capitalism must prevail. In the theory of Capitalism, the society as a whole decides the needs and wants of the people. However, in the theory of Socialism, the government will decide what is needed for the people, how much of it to make, where to distribute, etc. This only proves you should vote PRO to solve the problems that CON presents. I think the technology argument is irrelevant, a legitimate would use/sell technology to maximize profits. Point 2: "Money is not sent from the heavens ... as much as possible for each other." I admit money is human-made. We work for the best of the individual, which in turns does in fact benefit society. The only true direct wealth is private property, which means at least, you continue to vote PRO. There is no problem with the function of the theory in this sense. Also, the socialist mentality would not be able to function in that the government manages your life. In Marxism, no one has reason to work if the government works for them. Points 3: The scenario you describe is an example of an effective capitalist (who owns the business). Obviously managers treat their companies with respect to gain sales and keep workers. Also this would again only be available with Capitalism in mid. Lets consider the same example in a functioning Socialist society: The company is designated to create a certain computer system by the government, the company can vote within. They vote to moving facilities. This surely excites many people due to a newer and bigger facility, however, they no longer have incentive to continue working. In capitalism, if they enjoy their decision and their product, they believe they can improve their product and will work to be promoted so that they can satisfy their desire to help all. However, in the same socialist world, the hard work would in turn not benefit you at all. No additional pay, no stronger power, no changing force, no reason to continue. I feel that the best way is then to remain in the Capitalist ideology. Points 4: Of course currencies change, this is why we pin it down to private property. In the Socialist world, there will be no direct sign of wealth, ONLY currency. Therefore Capitalism should be preferred. Also, I guarantee the majority of 'free software or technologies' that you mention are surely free to the buyer, but the seller still does this for money in most cases. These developers normally promote advertisements, or use them later on to show their quality and experience for later jobs/actions. Point 5: Well, I don't quite understand this point. Sure people are extorted for production. I realize this and am in pity for these people. However, if you say you advocate for a more modern form of Socialism, I would argue for a more modern form of Capitalism. Obviously there are concepts to prevent over-extortion, like minimum wage or child labor laws, etc. I do realize people are still treated horribly, but this is still the better mentality of a Socialist society. I also want to emphasize some points that are weakly contested by CON; Private Property is the direct wealth that CON believes should exist - vote PRO; and there are still incentives to improve work conditions/products/etc. for the purpose of humanity while no incentives remain in Socialism.