rezzealaux and The_Devils_Advocate are the same people

To my esteemed Rezzealaux, I appreciate your timely response to my arguments. This has been a wonderful debate, and I am glad that you accepted it. But without any further ado,(I like using that word...ado) I will begin. I too shall begin with the argumentation on burdens as that is the way it has begun the last few rounds. You claim that you have a burden just not what I have said it is. Let's take a look at what you say your burden is, and it is here my good man that you have made your biggest mistake. You claim..."The burden of proof I have is to show that I have DID." Now realize that this is not the burden I placed upon you. The burden I specified was to show that we are the same person. Not that you have DID. So in saying that you must show you have DID but cannot do that, you say that you cannot uphold your burden. When you cannot uphold your burden then you must lose the round. Take a look at my previous statement that whoever upholds their burden the best should win. If I uphold my burden ever so slightly, then I must win as you cannot uphold the burden that you place upon yourself. But not only do you fail to meet that criteria, you fail to meet mine which is valid in itself. The resolution of a debate is the arena upon which our argumentation must fall on. The job of the affirmative is to uphold the resolution, and the job of the negative is to reject the resolution. It doesn't matter who proposed it. So Rezzealaux, you must in fact prove that we are the same person, and I must prove that we are not. You say that if someone claims to have a UFO that has landed in their backyard the burden of proof is theirs. But if someone disagrees with them, they also have a burden of proof. That being that there is no UFO in their backyard. And abuse is a common word that everyone knows what it means. It's contextually defined. Especially after I specify about losing what education may be lost. Now for DID vs. Schizophrenia (that would be an interesting fight...). Many of the symptoms are the same including depression, social withdrawal, and attitudes that are opposite from the other. This comes from your own evidence. So use the same argumentation here as there, and since you didn't argue against it, it still stands. Now let's talk about how DID works and what it takes to fix it. According to your wikipedia article, one of the most common ways to cure DID is to reunite dissociated identities. So if we are in fact the same person and you realize this, I should soon dissolve into the past. I ask voters to wait to vote and see if I continue to debate on this site. If I do that is evidence enough to support my claim and burden. You also make another mistake. You say that you still care about me. Once again according to your article this is false. Dissociated identities of those with DID often are completely opposite and do not like each other. Just one more error you have made in your last round. Now to clarify the argument I made about your usage of the third person regarding myself. This does in fact show how we aren't the same person. You regard me as a seperate entity to yourself. By showing difference you acknowledge difference. This is a huge argument with feminists. They will say that by showing there is a difference between male and female, it is discrimination. Feminism calls for true equality between humans, not the sexes. So by acknowledging me as something different than yourself you are acknowledging my seperate entityness (entityness?...maybe it's a word, if not then it shall be soon as I will continue to increase it's use.) So the reasons that people should vote for me is as follows: 1. When you realize that I have continued to debate on this site, you realize that we aren't different identities of the same body as once the host realizes this, they stop being different identities. 2. My opponent recognizes my being a different entity. 3. The most important reason to vote for me today is that my opponent has failed to uphold the burden that he has placed upon himself and the burden that is naturally his from accepting this debate. When that happens, you look to the argumentation that I have provided that shows that he probably doesn't have DID, that I am not another identity of his, and that he recognizes my entityness (you didn't think it would come out twice in this debate did you?). Thus with my arguments over, I would like to urge you to vote for the con being myself, and wish Rezzealaux the best of luck in his final argument and in his future rounds. Thank you ever so much and have a wonderful day.