BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Let's Rap/Rhyme

Listen, you're living in a fantasy worldit's as his whole mind has been viciously whirledFor I am Dr. Gedet of Debate.org sanatoriumAs I am your doctor, please refrain from the opiumIt is bad for your mind as clearly displayed here Now do us all a favor and please disapearI've prescribed you some drugs, to make your mind clearPlease, open wide you've got nothing to fearThese will take away your delusional fantasiesNow please stop reading Donald Trump Biographies Now do you want to be put in solitary confinement?Or should we go ahead with the mind realignment?You know theres drugs that will make you a normal human beingAnd will stop you from the world you appear to be seeingWhich is filled with delusions, we both know thatNow please, stop beating yourself with a baseball bat.
Let's Rap/Rhyme

As I climb these skyscrapers of your own rhymes, let me give you a reality check, lets me some of your real rhymes, cause I'm the Donald trump of rhymes, even before this war was started you were already fired, now lets see you retort it cause this is debate.org, this ain't no place for your sketchy words you may be gedet and this may be your debate, but I'm the master so lets debate I've got a 401(k), what's you got that little cardboard box cause I'm like Nationwide I ain't on your side, Now lets hurry this up quick it cause your bedtime Now let the grownups rhymes.
Let's Rap/Rhyme

at first i was worried but now it ain't soI had this battle won straight from the get gonow I understand if you cower awayIt'd be just like another check on a pay dayBut hey, if thats not your game, im here to retortjust know that you're in the kings courtyou're the jester im the corporate investoryou're doing good at making me laughbut get out before I call the security staffcause this is my debate and were throughnow I think its about time that you withdrew
Let's Rap/Rhyme

So, You may not be ready for the master flow, but I'm sorry kid but I have this master flow I don't want to be mean so let me say this quick you just can't mess with another white kid You may think your smart with all your rhymes but just listen, if you've got the time you may learning something from this after all I'm TheDaedricMaster I'm new to this debate thing and I'm sorry if you can't win this battle but don't worry you'll have another chance to gain the respect that you neva had, just keep tryin and you got the hang of it and we will see who has the best rhymes, oops it seems my time is up so let me get out of here, but I'll be back soon so please don't frown, but in 14 hours this debate will be ova and we will see who's the best.
Let's Rap/Rhyme

my name is gedet on debate.orgmy ryhmes'll leave you stiff in your towns morguebut lets not be so gruesome, lets stay on trackhow in the heck am i going to configure this attackwell first off, guy im sorry for youif I lived in your town, id be crying toobut lets digress and be a little more matureyour job is to shovel cow manure?thats it im done, im leaving for the doori hope your ready son because you're done for i am so bad
Physician Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia Should Be Made Legal in America

While pain medication is an option for providing comfort towards the end on a person's life, there is only so much medicine can do. For example, look at Tay-Sachs Disease, a degenerative brain disorder primarily affecting Ashkenazi Jews that typically begins at the ages of six months and causes the child to lose their skills over time. By the time the child is three, they are completely paralyzed, nonverbal, unable to swallow, blind, cognitively impaired, and have constant seizures that do not respond to medication. There is nothing you can do for that child but watch them die. That is why euthanasia needs to be an option. It is an act of mercy. Also, to prevent the DNR type document from being falsified as with any legal document there would need to be a witness at such a signing.
Physician Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia Should Be Made Legal in America

Firstly, while yes I agree that there are, "Terminal conditions that exist leading to long-term suffering and severely effect the quality of life", Hospitals are outfitted with extremely strong painkillers such as morphine, oxycodone, and pethidine to name a few. I also 100% agree that the undesirable symptoms would be horrific and aren't sacred. But there are many dangers in legalizing euthanasia. First and foremost, executing euthanasia would give a certain paycheck to the physician who aids in this activity, which could cause mental trauma over time, I mean, you're killing someone. While yes it may be a wanted and legal murder, you are still watching the life flow out of another person's eyes. Not only this, but the heartless people in the world may even run a scam just for the paycheck. This would simply be done by the physician who clears his patient for mentally ill, says that he will deteriorate over time, and then kill his patient. The DNR style confirmation from the patient could simply be forged by the doctor or accidentally signed by the patient if the physician provides a medicine that puts the patient into a drowsy state or half-conscious state. Furthermore, if the patient could've been cured, the physicians career could be ruined, the victims family could even go to court and sue for murder. This legalization would clog the government because they need to create clauses, hear court cases, endure protests.
Physician Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia Should Be Made Legal in America

Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia, should be made legal in the United States because it many cases in is in the patient's best interest. Many painful, terminal conditions exist that lead to long-term suffering and severely effect the quality of life. Life is sacred, yes, but when that life is blind, deaf, paralyzed, unable to swallow, and seizing uncontrollably then there is nothing "sacred" about it. Physician assisted suicide would be handled in a similar way to a DNR legally speaking, with the patient signing a paper stating that in the even of a certain illness or medical state they would be okay with having their life ending painlessly, gently, and professionally by a trusted doctor.
Prostitution should be legalized

I am not undermining my argument. You just can't see the connection. Let's use an analogy: nobody wants to get raped. If we legalize rape, More people will get raped. Does that mean that people want to get raped? Same thing with prostitution. If someone was offered to either be a prostitute or a normal job that pays the same, Everybody would choose a normal job that pays the same. Women become prostitutes not because they want to, But because they are poor and uneducated. Most prostitutes aren't hot ladies who make thousands of dollars, They are unattractive poor uneducated women who want to make money quickly. Just like some women are cleaning ladies, But does anyone truly want to be a cleaning lady for their whole life?
Prostitution should be legalized

Legalizing prostitution isn't going to solve anything. More prostitutes is absolutely not a goal which we should pursue, Since it's bad for the economy and bad for women. You say "legalizing prostitution would close the gap between the two a little bit more" like it's a good thing. No, It's not a good thing! There is a huge difference between being naked/having sex with attractive people on camera versus being paid to have sex with people you don't know. And that gap shouldn't be shrunk! We shouldn't try to grow the prostitution industry, We should try to eliminate it completely. Legalizing prostitution would only increase the amount of prostitutes.
Prostitution should be legalized

I never said that legalizing prostitution would make the problem go away I was simply saying that it would give them more support the cops could be called and they wouldn't be arrested for prostitution their abuser would be or their rapist would be not them. Yes you've got me there the porn industry and prostitution are two very different things but legalizing prostitution would close the gap between the two a little bit more, Now I'm not saying that prostitution would magically just not be taboo anymore, However I am saying that less people would look at it as shameful and more people would invest, And you said porn stars don't always have to have sex, But neither do prostitutes some are paid for less than sex and not ALL of their money goes away to pimps.
Prostitution should be legalized

I never said that pimps and brothels don't exist, No need for the sarcasm. However, Legalizing prostitution would lead to MORE pimps and brothels. Just like with murder: making murder illegal doesn't stop all murder, But if we made murder legal the murder rates would increase a lot. Maybe we should instead have more police and better laws so we can decrease the amount of pimps and brothels? Of course, Abuse of prostitutes is a problem. But what makes you think that legalizing prostitution would make the problem go away? In 19th century London, There were thousands of poor prostitutes who worked in brothels. They were abused, Murdered, And raped at a time when prostitution was completely legal. Most prostitutes now are poor as well. You said that they make hundreds of dollars a day, But that money goes away to pimps. Like I said before, Being a high-end prostitute is very hard (you need to be very fit, Very beautiful, Etc) and only a tiny amount of prostitutes are high-end. Usually, Most prostitutes are poor because people don't want to be prostitutes, So wealthy people choose other jobs. Being a pornstar is different from being a prostitute. Porn stars don't always have to have sex, If they do they have it with very attractive people, Porn stars are very famous and make lots of money. Prostitutes are poor and abused by pimps and clients. Nobody wants to be a prostitute. I don't have to do worldwide polls to prove that.
Prostitution should be legalized

So most of your rebuttal here is about how legalizing prostitution would be dangerous for women because pimps and brothels will appear because first of all those totally don't already exist and if you actually read my argument you would have realized that should prostitution become legal the prostitutes will have someone to rely on they will finally be able to call the cops if they've been abused. You also said that prostitutes make bad money? Have you looked at the numbers, In low end brothels prostitutes make upwards of 300 dollars a day? Some prostitutes even charge upwards of 1000 dollars for a customer for an hour or more. Finally you said that NO ONE wants to be a prostitute. . . . So you can speak for the world? No one wants to be a porn star?
Prostitution should be legalized

Legalizing prostitution would actually be harmful to women. If we completely legalize prostitution, Then pimps and brothels will appear. They will hire women for small amounts of money and take all the profit, Meaning that prostitutes will always be very poor. A lot of poor women would just become prostitutes like in 19th century Britain, Instead of trying to get an education and a good job. This will be very bad for women who work for pimps, Since police often ignore poor regions of cities. Legalizing prostitution would be bad for the economy. More women becoming prostitutes would mean that less women get good education and good jobs. Prostitution is a service, Which means it doesn't produce anything for the economy. A baker makes cakes, A miner mines coal, A banker gives out loans. A prostitute only has sex, Which doesn't help the economy at all because it doesn't produce goods. Legalizing prostitution is morally wrong. One of the worst things a woman can do is sell her body for money. Nobody wants to be a prostitute, Because the job is disgusting. Nobody likes having sex with people you don't know and don't like for small amounts of money. Most prostitutes are poor and do not get paid a lot, So it's not a good job.
Prostitution should be legalized

For many years people believed prostitution to be too taboo to talk about but as of late many countries have actually been making moves to legalize prostitution and some have even completely decriminalized it. Many people are quick to talk about how dangerous of a job prostitution is and that keeping it illegal keeps people from wanting anything to do with prostitution but should it be legalized then sex workers will become much less vulnerable as the field will be more exposed to the public and regulated by the government. Also in countries that have already decriminalized prostitution many of them claim that there has been little to no increase in sex trafficking only an increase in the protection of sex workers. While the field of work involving any form of sex is not a very popular choice for those who choose to work in it those who take advantage of it or even just society looking upon it but if you really think about it prostitutes are just ever day people just trying to make a living doing something that they may or may not like and who are we to judge that. Since the job of a prostitute is such a dangerous one and is illegal at that when a prostitute winds up with a dangerous or violent customer she can't call the police and say "Hey this guy is attacking me please help" because the police will show up and realize okay there's prostitution going on here you're going to jail so prostitutes can't rely on the protection of the police.
Weapon debate

First off, I would like to point out my opponent has chosen a gun dad I have picked, and has not picked a LMG. The P-90 and the AA-12 have higher firing rates then my opponents selections. The Intervention fires a .480 Cheytec round. That's bigger then a .50cal. The StG-44 was the first assault rifle ever made. It was the basis for the Ak-47 and the M-16. The M249 Squad Automatic Weapon, or M249SAW, was the workhorse of the US Military before the introduction of the M240Bravo. It fires a 5.56x4mm NATO round, the same kind used in the M16 and M4A1. This means that if your running out of ammo, you can use magazines from M16-M4A1's and continue laying down the fire. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org...
Pot legalization... IN A RAP BATTLE!

Morgan Freeman He's just an actor, not important For important legal issues You shouldn't have him represent Who cares what people say When referring to cocaine? This debate's about weed I cannot follow your thought train! I apologize If my wording confused you I meant that with easier access Addiction will follow soon One thousand Divided by fifty Do the math, man! From each state, that's a measly twenty Who knows What could happen if we legalize dope? Recreational heroin, crack?
Pot legalization... IN A RAP BATTLE!

Morgan Freeman, a joke?I just can't believe my eyes.You just can't joke about that man!He's the wisest of the wise!38% in the USAAdmit to trying Mary JaneWhile only 1.4 percentRegularly take cocaine (1)And what the f*ck are you trying to sayWhen you type that "addiction diffuses"I'm certainly not the only guyThat your wording confuses. And that ain't some online survey, bro. It's a f*cking Gallup Poll! (2) Over 1000 they surveyed From across the 50 states. So come one, come all Those with a bit of hope Divided, we're short, but together we're tall Let's legalize recreational dope. Voters, come and read thisAnd show how much you know.In this debate, just who succeeded.Peace upon y'all, vote for pro. Sources: 1. http://www.drugabuse.gov... 2. http://www.gallup.com...
Pot legalization... IN A RAP BATTLE!

I thank you for returningTo this battle of wit and rhymeOn why the reefer that I'm burning Should be a blessing, not a crime. "Never give up the Ganja"Morgan Freeman wisely said. (1.)You can't refute wise words of wisdomStraight from Morgan Freeman's head!You say that sales "Will face growth"Is that not what we need?Help the economy and people bothBy legalizing weed.Read this Gallup.com poll (2) The people all have spoken Now, let's legalize it, light a bowl, And we can all get tokin'. Sources 1. http://www.wetpaint.com... 2. http://www.gallup.com...
Pot legalization... IN A RAP BATTLE!

Sorry about that I was busy yesterday I'll now respond to this With no more delay Sure, a lot of money is spent To stop transaction of weed But abuse causes problems So the warnings you should heed Furthermore, It can cause financial problems If you get addicted Your amount of money will have fallen Do we really need More legal addictions on the earth If we make it legal The sales will face much growth As I have shown, It can cause almost nothing but harm To the cons of pot, I hope I've raised some alarm
Pot legalization... IN A RAP BATTLE!

Firstly, I would like to thankThe debater who acceptedHe went against his own beliefsWhen others had rejectedFist I'll make a couple pointsWhile sparking up a couple jointsWhich Seventhprofessor will refuteProving my arguments moot.The Gov. sure spends a lot of money Enforcing laws on Marijuney Taxpayers pay, against their will A total over 40 bil.
Pot legalization... IN A RAP BATTLE!

In this day on DDO, Rap battles tend to come and go, But there's time aplenty to debate On something that you love or hate. I write, of course, of Mary Jane, That herb that loves to ease my pain And so befuddle up my brain Regardless of the price or strain.My opponent shall argueAgainst the progress of our nationI will be a stoner trueRapping pro for legalization So come on, squares! I'm short on time. Just spit it out And make it rhyme.
The states should have significantly more power than the national government.

"The only powers that the nation should have are the aquiring of wealth(what I described above), military, currency, interstate infrastucture, and settling disputes between states."I disagree. I believe that the national government should also have the power to - regulate commerce, (which is single handedly the biggest power of Congress since it includes business regulation, environmental regulation, controlling the minimum wage, setting interest rates, - choose how to collect income (decide what gets taxed and by how much)- safeguard civil rights (which we know will be a problem in the southern states and the Bible Belt)- establish courts and enforce penalties for federal crimes- conduct foreign policy- make treaties/ trade agreements with foreign nations- overrule state laws and be the supreme law of the land- be able to enforce their rules as they see fit- be able to enforce the collection of revenue from statesThe last time the US was organized so that the states had significantly more power then the national government, it was under the Articles of Confederation which were so disastrous that it almost drove the US into chaos and anarchy: http://americanhistory.about.com...What pro is proposing is nearly identical to the system in place in early America that was so bad it almost destroyed the new nation, so anyone with a brain should know that the states should NOT have significantly more power than the national government because the last time that happened it really f*cking sucked......
The states should have significantly more power than the national government.

I believe that the states should have more power than the national government. I believe that the states should be able to levy taxes, make the moral decisions(guns, abortion, gays, etc.), and the economic decisions(budget and regulation). I believe that the national government should be able to take a percent of state revenue, the nation can choose this, but the state is in charge of acquiring the revenue. For example, the nation can choose to acquire thirty percent of state revenue. This means that GA, TN, NY, NJ, etc. would tax the people and give thirty percent of their revenue to the nation. The only powers that the nation should have are the aquiring of wealth(what I described above), military, currency, interstate infrastucture, and settling disputes between states. The person who accepts this debate will argue against what I have stated and that the nation should have more power than the states.
Taylor Swift is not a crazy cat lady that can't keep a man

I will rebut the statements my opponent has given so far."Taylor Swift has two cats. TWO!! Also its not that she can't keep the men. It's the men can't keep her."Firstly, my opponent's argument is inductive, meaning that these statements perhaps indicate that Taylor Swift is not a crazy cat lady. However, this leaves room for doubt, and since the resolution requires affirmation beyond any doubt, the resolution cannot be affirmed via inductive reasoning. To show this line of rebuttal in a concrete fashion, only have two cats may indicate that she is not a crazy cat lady, yet it conceivable that Taylor is a crazy cat lady. For example, she could be in the process of purchasing more cats, of which a crazy cat lady might do. This possibility is enough to negate the resolution.Secondly, there is no evidence to suggest either way that either men don't want her, or she doesn't think the men she met are good enough for her. Without contextual evidence, this point remains unaffirmed.Lastly, none of my opponent's claims are referenced. This renders my opponent's arguments as bare assertions, of which means they are logical fallacies [1].The burden of proof has not been me; the resolution remains unaffirmed.Reference[1] http://www.toolkitforthinking.com...
ISIS is the Modern Version of Early British Colonialism

Based off of ISIS' perceived motivations for starting their rather savage acts and war in the Middle East, I would like to declare that I believe ISIS is the modern version of the early British colonists. The fact that ISIS wants to convert as many people as possible to their own religion, invade other countries in attempt to take over the world, kill innocent civilians, and the use of religion--an earlier version of Islam for ISIS, Christianity for British colonists--to defend the evil that they have committed, are some primary examples of how the two are similar. I do want to repeat that I said the two are similar, not the same. As a side note for anyone who wants to debate with me, I am doing this to increase my intellect by acquiring new knowledge on other people's opinions, perspectives, and facts. I look forward to hearing your perspective, :3! P.S.: if you do not want to "debate", you can just type something in the comment section, ^w^.