Humans would survive the typical ( slow zombie ) zombie apocalypse.

Hi again, Warlords 1. I don't think warlords would actually defend their territory by killing zombies. Seriously, those people I guarantee would use zombies and their stupidity would kill themselves and people around them. In WWII, sure the Commies and the Nationalists teamed up, but if you remember they didn't actually work together, they just didn't kill each other. Police 2. If the government/police was capable of this, then zombie apocalypse that we see on TV wouldn't happen. And also, the fact that you say a few hours makes my argument stronger, because if you do the math and every 30 seconds a new person gets infected, it goes 1-2-4-8-16-32-64 in less then 5 minutes. Military 3. If you see how hard zombies are to kill, then you will know that a couple of helicopters won't do the trick. Also, how will there be pilots if they're all zombies? You are guaranteeing to me that militaries won't collapse. They are trying to evacuate citizens and enforce martial law, and they simply wouldn't have time to do anything. And if there are a 100 zs that converge on a tank they can easily hold it until say. .. thousands of zombies get there are they starve the people inside. CDC and WHO 4. No, CDC and WHO wouldn't work. Did you see how lucky those people were to even survive getting the vaccines? Imagine how many there would be in the CDC Georgia. If we can't produce vaccines that are effective for things such as Ebola, then we can't possibly develop a zombie vaccine. Outerspace 5. We don't have outer space. Humans won't get to Mars until 2024 and I don't think that we will go to the moon. It is to expensive and sucks money away from the actual war effort. Doomsday Bunk 6. As previously mentioned, these won't work. Why? Simply because of what I said last time: humans will need to come out and will not survive the zombie hoard awaiting. If it takes 5 years of resources before you need to come out, how many zombies will arrive vs how many new deaths. And we are assuming there is no outbreak inside the bunker! 8 billion people happened over 6000 years according to Adam and Eve's story. I don't think you'd see reproduction on such a massive scale, when there would be fear that people you do it with have the virus themselves! And no, zombies don't just decompose because there is no reason for them to do so. If you're saying they decompose, then it wouldn't be the 'typical' apocalypse, would it? And the horde of refugees would prevent checks for the virus, and normally in these typical situations everyone has it, and when they die they become a zombie. I don't agree with the terrorist arguments or the wall argument for many reasons. First off, it takes years to build walls in major cities such as Shanghai and New York, and also there would be much opposition because it would take taxpayer dollars and a lot of people wouldn't see a threat of Zombies. Also, I don't think that terrorists would just blindly shoot zombies. Do you see them do that to their enemies? No, they capture them. Islands can be in play but seeing the chaos on the mainland and the military collapse how will people get there? And how would tens of millions of Chinese zombies not go to North Korea? There are 7.3 billion people on earth, according to . http://www.worldometers.info.... I think it is clear that most of them would in fact die in this apocalypse, and the survivors would be killed off, seeing as most babies would die early on. My opponent has answered most of his own points, and basically stated I'm correct about virtually all his arguments, and since he has given himself BoP, I think he hasn't really proven anything as we see that so many things can go wrong in warfare, especially against zombies. Therefore, a Zombie apocalypse would be terrible, and humans would definitely not survive.