Second Challenge to all free willers and determinsit: Is human language a living creature

Good evening. I have to admit, I was hoping for more effort into the actual evidence that speech is not a living creature. But human speech through its slave has instead merely thrown some stale comments at my person as if the mere fact he has a private sense of humor that is entertaining to him personally and that he has said anything at all is the only evidence possible. I can only suppose my opponent to be still yearning for the Clinton/Obama years and watches the old videos of yesteryear speeches of his own language in which a mere pause for the breath of the speaker mandates cheering and claps. I leave the image of my opponent glued to the tv through his slave tuning into 'the View' to re-feel the old feelings and still vapidly cheering and clapping alone in the dark at the old videos of Clinton and Obama to you. My opponent is of course, human speech itself and the particular victim through whom it speaks at present that it uses to post written text to provoke emotion about anything else than the topic at hand. My opponent has made claims that computers are the arbiters of truth over human beings rather than God, that a language is not a language unless a computer can translate it; that human death through abortion is a good thing; that it is not a non-believer in Jesus Christ and that the debate is not about Jesus Christ; that I am not a Christian. It has defended the honor of Chomsky, whom I have pointed out that even though he is a communist, liberal wacko, was used by human speech to defined language in such a way as to plainly make room for human speech to be a living creature. Yet my opponent has not address even the statements his own hero has made. Human speech through Chomsky: "The language faculty is often equated with "communication""a trait that is shared by all animal species and possibly also by plants. In our view, for the purposes of scientific understanding, language should be understood as a particular computational cognitive system, implemented neurally, that cannot be equated with an excessively expansive notion of "language as communication" [1]. Externalized language may be used for communication, but that particular function is largely irrelevant in this context. Thus, the origin of the language faculty does not generally seem to be informed by considerations of the evolution of communication...." Chomsky himself doesn't want human speech to be denigrated as merely "sound" but defends it as-if it were much more than "just" communication. -----One would expect such pride-based statements by human speech if it were indeed a living creature.----- The fact that human speech uses human numbers to place a supposed premium on that pride by the supposed luster of science is just cleverness, not truth. A speech that cannot even create one thing would naturally use a non-creating measurement system, in which it implicitly asks everything to not move long enough so some notches on a dead stick can supposedly 'measure it' and who, having conceptually moved that dead stick to a machine that uses the math it thought up on a slide rule "real fast" as if it were new and thus "amazing". My opponent uses one who seems rather dazzled by these developments and has a particular sense of pride and humor based on that pride about anyone is not so blinded as itself. I can understand that and have compassion because human beings, without the benefit of the spirit of Jesus Christ in them as their native speech, are deceived that a speech with the non-creating characteristic as their own is the only possible type of speech in total reality and thus that through its supposed use in a supposed free will, they can go out and gain whatever truth there is to be known. Rather than understand that Jesus Christ is the Truth ( truth is then not a 'what' but a Who ) and the Embodiment of the Word of God/Incarnation of the Word of God in flesh, the human speech in them deceives them into thinking of itself as the only path to God..that it is the Master of all Prayer and that without such "communication" God can't hear you. But it is itself deceived and powerless. What the spirit of the Embodiment of the Word of God/Jesus Christ said about the anti-Christ ( anti-Word of God) is exactly what the human speech through its slave is saying: not only has "speech becoming flesh" not happened yet, but it makes fun of the mere thought that it is even possible. God as Word through His servant John: 1John 4:1-6 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but prove the spirits, if they are of God; because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby ye know the Spirit of God: every spirit which confesses Jesus Christ come in flesh is of God; and every spirit which does not confess Jesus Christ come in flesh is not of God: and this is that power of the antichrist, of which ye have heard that it comes, and now it is already in the world. *Ye* are of God, children, and have overcome them, because greater is he that is in you than he that is in the world. *They* are of the world; for this reason they speak as of the world, and the world hears them. *We* are of God; he that knows God hears us; he who is not of God does not hear us. From this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error. Jesus Christ the Incarnate Word of God has come ..in flesh. John 8:25 They said therefore to him, Who art thou? And Jesus said to them, Altogether that which I also say to you. "I am what I say." That is not hard to understand unless one is drunk on a strange mix of pride and humorous emotions and seeking more of the same and only has a palette developed exclusively for more of the same. My opponent claims to not be a non-believer in Jesus Christ and to be an authority on what a Christian is in order to claim I am not one and that it understands what the debate is about. So it always is with pagans, they have a favored version of false Christianity through which they wish to denigrate God. The Word of God made flesh/Jesus Christ had this to say through his servant James: James 2:19 Thou believest that God is one. Thou doest well. The demons even believe, and tremble. Even the demons, to include the Legion that the Embodiment of the Word of God cast out knows who Jesus Christ is. So being "not a non-believer" in Jesus Christ is not an endorsement of honesty and truth. The demon's know Who the embodiment of the Word of God and they know His Spirit and they know when human speech is divided against itself and attempts to fake being the spirit of the Word of God. Act 19:13-17 And certain of the Jewish exorcists also, who went about, took in hand to call upon those who had wicked spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, I adjure you by Jesus, whom Paul preaches. And there were certain men , seven sons of Sceva, Jewish high priest, who were doing this. But the wicked spirit answering said to them, Jesus I know, and Paul I am acquainted with; but *ye*, who are ye? And the man in whom the wicked spirit was leaped upon them, and having mastered both, prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded. And this became known to all, both Jews and Greeks, who inhabited Ephesus, and fear fell upon all of them, and the name of the Lord Jesus was magnified. Did the wicked spirit answer them in non-human speech? Or were the spirits ..human speech itself. The arguments of ancient times were not over 'whether or not' speech becomes flesh or 'whether or not' human speech is a living creature, they were over which one was God as Word. Having so utterly lost that argument and plainly Jesus Christ emerged as victor, now the anti-Christ/human speech has sought to re-image the argument into "speech is a non-living entity and how did it get here?" Christianity is not the only religion that personifies Wisdom and Speech. All the false religions personify it in the spirit not-yet-flesh because they deny Christ has already come in flesh: Wikipedia: "Wisdom" "The ancient Romans also valued wisdom. It was personified in Minerva, or Pallas." They made a statue of an idea of what speech is and God as Word mocks them for it: Psalm 115:3-8 But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he pleased. Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men's hands: They have a mouth, and they speak not; eyes have they, and they see not; They have ears, and they hear not; a nose have they, and they smell not; They have hands, and they handle not; feet have they, and they walk not; they give no sound through their throat. They that make them are like unto them, --every one that confideth in them. Isaiah 41:21-24 Produce your cause, saith Jehovah; bring forward your arguments, saith the King of Jacob. Let them bring them forward, and declare to us what shall happen: shew the former things, what they are, that we may give attention to them, and know the end of them; --or let us hear things to come: declare the things that are to happen hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods; yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be astonished, and behold it together. Behold, ye are less than nothing, and your work is of nought; an abomination is he that "chooseth" you. ... It would be tedious to list all the names given to the personification of human speech only to finally understand they are all talking about the same false god that will ultimately be made flesh, but not God or God as Word, renamed hundreds of times.. from: https://www.themystica.com... "Vac, Sanskrit, vac, "speech," Hindu (Vedic), is the goddess of the spoken word. --She is the personification of speech and oral communication-- ... My opponent has disappointed me with his fight style. I expected more a fake-scholarly type of attack, more links, actual engagement. But in the end, he has done all his human speech can do. He might as well as just written "ha ha ha ha ha ha..!" In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen