Evolution is true and Biblical Creation is false

First of all, I would like to clarify a clear misconception you have about biological evolution. You mention numerous times throughout your argument that there is evidence for microevolution, which I am happy to see, but that there is no evidence for macroevolution. Within the scientific community, biologists tend not to use either of those terms and stick to simple "evolution." This is because micro and macroevolution only refer to the amount of time that evolution is taking place over, but they are governed by the same evolutionary process. By this logic, if there is evidence for microevolution, which you acknowledge there is, that means that if you widen the scope of time you are looking at evolution, you can observe macroevolution as well. The problem, of course, is that, by most people's standards for the time scale of macroevolution, it would be impossible for any single person or group of people to directly observe this, but that is not all that science is. Science is not all about direct observation, and if you think it is, I'd like to ask if you were there when God supposedly created everything; science will accept something as fact if it has gathered enough evidence for it, whether it be by direct observation or indirect observation (directly observing evidence that strongly points to a conclusion.) As I mentioned in my opening statement, there is evidence such as the fossil record, which does not have as many of these "missing transitional fossils" as you'd think(1), and the study of DNA and Genetics(2) to show the evolutionary process.Now, about your claims of Darwin and his knowledge of evolution and how it has changed. When Darwin first developed the Theory of Evolution and published it in his book On the Origin of Species, his idea of evolution was flawed in many of the specific details, but the general idea of species evolving that he came up with stands true to this day. As he did not have advanced equipment for studies, it was hard to pinpoint the exact mechanism by which evolution works, but through observational studies in animals such as Darwin's Finches(3) (only being one of many,) he was able to deduce accurately that evolution does exist. Since then we've been able to more accurately study and describe how biological evolution works. It is not some complex process as you seem to think it is, it is simply survival of the fittest. When DNA replicates, mutations may occur (I suggest watching this video to help understand(4).) If mutations occur in the sex cells, these mutations are passed along to their offspring. Should these random mutations prove to be beneficial to that organism, the organism is able to survive and pass the beneficial genes onto its offspring; should these mutations prove to be harmful, the organism may not survive and then the mutations die out with it. By this process, random but beneficial gene mutations are sucessfully passed on to generation after generation until they accumulate to produce larger, visible changes. Those changes accumulate to eventually form what we could consider a new species, or at least a transitional form. This process, as you would call macroevolution, does take millions of years, but is easily provable using fossil records and studying DNA.As for the creation of life and the universe, we are still unsure on many of the specifics, and we've come to terms with being able to say "we don't know" about a lot of things regardng those subjects. For example, we do not know, nor do we have a good hypothesis about, the origin of life on this planet. We do not know the specifics of the Big Bang, but we do know it happened. We can observe indirect evidence throughout our universe that conclusively points to the Big Bang, such as the fact that our universe is expanding at an increasing rate and that it is hotter near what is believed to be the center(5). One hypothesis on the origin of the singularity that sparked the Big Bang is quantum fluctuations. On the normal scale of physics, it is true that nothing can come from nothing, but on the quantum level of physics, the normal laws of physics do not apply. It has been observed that matter or energy can appear out of nothing and disappear right back into it. This could explain where the singularity came from, and the rest is up to the Big Bang Theory to explain.Lastly, if you're going to try to use religious text from the Bible to prove some kind of point, you are going to have to first prove that the Bible, or any other religious book you cite, is valid, but that is topic for another debate.If I missed any of your points, point them out again in your next argument and I should get to them.(1) http://en.wikipedia.org...(2) http://humanorigins.si.edu...(3) http://en.wikipedia.org...(4) (5) http://www.ctc.cam.ac.uk...