Hello guys Christians eat Homosexuals and rape people

Pro has misinterpreted my initial point.I stated that the Old Testament was only half of the Christian Bible. Which it is.This is as far as my statement went, at no point did I state that this means the Old Testament is false._____________________________________________________If Jesus truly endorsed the teachings of the Old Testament to the letter. Then why did he go against them?I again quote "The Adulterous Woman" From the book of John."Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her." And once again he bent down and wrote on the ground. When they heard it, they went away, one by one, beginning with the elders; and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him. Jesus straightened up and said to her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?" She said, "No one, sir." And Jesus said, "Neither do I condemn you. Go your way, and from now on do not sin again." (NRSV, John 8:7-11) [1]According to the Old Testament, Adultery is punishable by stoning. But Jesus intervened with this act and prevented a woman being stoned to death. He has gone against the laws of the Old Testament in this instance. Why has he done this if he was not abolishing some Laws of the Old Testament?Maybe he wasn't abolishing them, maybe he was amending them.Jesus continues throughout the New Testament to teach about compassion and forgiveness, this is an indication that Jesus wishes his followers to demonstrate the same acts of compassion and forgiveness when it came to the Laws of the Old Testament, as he did.These are simple interpretations someone could draw from the Bible. _____________________________________________________Interpretation.There is many a contradiction in the Bible and this is quite likely down to the fallible nature of the humans who wrote it when writing down the word of God.It is up to the reader to interpret the true teaching and word of God from these writings. To take them at face value with little to no study, would be naive. This can result in many conflicting interpretations.This fact has resulted in the formation of many separate branches of Christianity. Notable examples being Catholicism, Protestantism and Eastern Orthodox. Past this, there are hundreds of denominations, each with their own interpretations. Moreover, each individual Christian reads the Bible and brings away their own interpretations.Point being, the Bible isn't an obvious set of teachings. One needs to study it, to discover the true teachings and true word of God. This study can result in hundreds, if not thousands of interpretations that differ sometimes subtly and sometimes not so subtly. This means that just because you have read a handful of verses, and interpreted that they discriminate against homosexuals and relate to rape, does not mean that every Christian on earth follows these same interpretations.I can prove this by providing you with a list of Christian denominations that affirm homosexuality as not a sin.[2]http://en.wikipedia.org...This debunks your original statement "Hello guys Christians eat Homosexuals and rape people"._____________________________________________________One last thing I'd like to look at pros most frequented source.www.evilbible.comThis seems a source with incredible bias, they analyze scripture and draw conclusions to deliberately portray the Bible in a negative way. If one is to impartially analyze the meaning of scripture, one must not jump to conclusions without considering other possibilities. Evilbible fail to do this time and again. I am therefore questioning it's integrity as a valid source to corroborate pros arguments._____________________________________________________[1]https://www.biblegateway.com...[2]http://en.wikipedia.org...