Resolved: The United States should send military into N. Korea.

Thanks you for replying back. I will discuss, why attacking North Korea is again a very back idea. 1. Your arguments with Morality. Yes i claimed it happen in other places. Such as Russia , China and Iran. But you failed on making a strong case going to war with North Korea because of Morality. I will tell you why, because we the US can't police every country in the world. If the US try to force North Korea to change with force. Other country will push back against the US. Other country will not change just because the US think they are wrong. And you saying we should start with North Korea because they are small is not a good justification on going to war. Neither going to war because they have a bad leader. It will be a push back against he US if they use force. For your second reason Political. You want prove. Okay, it would hurt our relationship with south korea and other world leaders. Why would it hurt. Because no one want war. Every other countries warning not to go to war. "Moon's chief task as South Korean president is to make sure "there is never again a war on the Korean Peninsula,". (3.) http://www.aljazeera.com... "Moon also said he want Peace". Just because North korea has a fascist dictatorship, doesn't mean war is justified. "North Koreans don't want war - to them, nuclear arms are simply a bargaining chip". (4.) https://www.independent.ie... So you want a war that no on wants. You want to go ahead and attack without probable cause. And your so called evidence, doesn't show why we should attack the North. Another example is how US policy failed again. Like trying to taken out Bashar al-Assad from Syria. Syria is still very bad off. So trying to knock out Kim Jon Un Would be very hard. It won't be easy to remove him from power. Something you didn't even mention. The third reason you put is Existential. Again showing no proof why attacking the North would be justified. Just because North Korea make threats doesn't mean they will act on them. North Korea know they can't attack first, they know they would lose. So no point on attack the north. By the way the US are making threats as well, so the North is just trying to defend their own country. Another thing to keep in mind both the US and the Soviet made threat against each other. And yet both countries found a way to coexist with each other. The same logic should apply with North Korea. The 4th point you made just not really true. Why Because of that treaty i mention in the first round. China would help the North if they were attack first. Another reason why China would help in a conflict with the North is this. China doesn't want the US influences over there. They don't want the US over there period. China is challenging the US over dominance of power, over trade, territorial areas, military, and economy. China see a threat and that's the US. The US and china about to go head to head in a trade war, then the South China Sea is also a very touching topic that both disagree on. So there are reasons why China would help out in a war if the US strike first. Another part to this equation is Russia. "As U.S. and China find common ground on North Korea, is Russia the wild card?". (5.) https://www.reuters.com... The Michael Kelly part is actually outdated. It was back in 2013, and doesn't have any relevancy in this debate. It doesn't show why we should attack north korea nor why we should. It doesn't show China would back down if there see there national interest is at stake. Which the North Korea issues would be a national security issue for China. By the way China and Japan still don't see the same interest over these islands. Either way your so called evidence isn't relevant on this topic. You said the "death count would be significantly lower because it would be the US versus North Korea" that prove to me you have no idea how many people would die. "If North Korea launched a nuclear attack, the death toll would be costly: perhaps as bad as 2.1 million deaths in Tokyo and Seoul alone". (6.) http://time.com... "Even the US Congress' own research arm has estimated that a military conflict on the Korean Peninsula is likely to kill 300,000 people just in the first few days". (7.) http://www.aljazeera.com... "Pentagon scenario of a new Korean war estimates 20,000 deaths daily in South Korea, retired US general says". (8.) https://www.cnbc.com... So, looking at these figures it doesn't look good. You want to risk millions of lives just because you are afraid of North Korea nuclear weapons. Like i mention earlier Russia and China both have more powerful weapons and testing them. They are a greater threat to the United State. "Top US general: China will be 'greatest threat' to US by 2025". (9.) http://www.cnn.com... Russia has the satan 2 and now kanyon. (10.) https://wtop.com... And China also upgrading their nuclear weapons. "China's Newly Tested Ballistic Missile Armed With a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle" (11.) https://thediplomat.com... So you want to attack them too? Because they are in fact a greater risk than North Korea. Look attacking North Korea would have grave consequences. Lost of life would be very high, we will be risking our good relationship with south kore to very untrustworthy, to hating on us. We will also be risking wars with China and Russia. Because they would not trust us even more. Everything you mention would be a terrible idea on going to war with North Korea. There is no justification on risking millions of lives, when in fact we know North Korea would not make the first move...