Pimps should have their own trade association

Like most people, I have often considered pimping out my brother's mates when I'm in London, but I have never done it - why? Because of the start up costs and difficulties connecting with potential customers. Consider what's involved. I would need lurk about expensive bars until I saw a group of rich-but-frustrated-looking women. Then, I would try to infiltrate their group and talk about sex: how bad it is when it's bad, how great it is when it's great and how men's performance standards are generally so low nowadays because of widespread use of internet porn which burns out the foreplay part of their brain which was tiny to begin with. We would all sigh, and I would say, "Great sex. I mean, how much would you pay for it? . .. Really? Maybe I can help you out there. .. " But even then, after all that investment of time, the chances of them agreeing to pay for sex with my brothers' mates, no matter how desperate they might be, is slim. As Pro says, the whole image of professional sex is too seedy. How much the situation would change with the introduction of NAESA! Professional sex would be as normal and acceptable as getting a manicure! Pimping would be as respectable as selling Tupperware! On my first day in London, I could print out some cards for a minimal fee with my phone number and the NAESA logo. In half an hour, I could distribute them to women at expensive restaurants, and the response would be entirely positive. ("NAESA! They're sponsors of the Royal Ballet, aren't they? " "Yes, my sister-in-law had them for her birthday, and she was delighted. ")I wouldn't be an actual member of NAESA, of course, but who could stop me using the logo? If anybody accused me of being a fraud, I would calmly reply, "I am The Booty Doctor," and the burden would be on my accuser to prove otherwise. This is why Pro's clever ruse of pimp names and identity-concealing headgear, although ingenious when it comes to deceiving police, would ultimately backfire on the pimping industry. With market conditions this good, who wouldn't do a bit of pimping on the side? Those awful scenes where the boyfriend is ditching his lovely girlfriend, shame-faced, muttering about "it was fun at the beginning. .. " could be turned around by saying, "Well, at least let me pimp you out a bit to pay off my credit card while my heart is broken. My aunt has a few issues she needs to work through sexually. .. and I'll give you 50%! " He could hardly refuse, given the circumstances, without seeming churlish. And all kinds of low-paid workers, from cashiers to aged-care attendants would pick up a bit extra from renting out their relatives to customers under the NAESA logo. As we know from basic economics, the consequences of flooding the market in this way will be dire:1. Prices will plummet. Already prices for sex in the UK are extremely low. More competition will only harm the industry. (1).2. The NAESA brand will become degraded with unauthorized use. Their "satisfaction guaranteed" motto will be scorned, and rightly so. This is why creating NAESA would be commercial suicide in the current legislative and economic environment. Pimps should not form their own trade association. (1) . http://www.economist.com...