Darwinism is the most Reasonable Theory for Life on Earth

Charles Darwin is the major actor behind the theory Darwinism which has advanced scientific method. His work challenged Christian Orthodoxy and enhanced scientific field by providing grounds for epistemological claims. However, the theories for life on Earth have substantially advanced from his famous book on the Origin of Species in 1859 to Modern and post-modern synthesises of 21st century."Darwinism designates a distinctive form of evolutionary explanation for the history and diversity of life on earth" (1). The formulation was provided in On the origins of species in 1859 by Charles Darwin. This great man has provided the core set of concepts, principles and methodological maxims adding as a ‘research tradition’ (Laudan, 1976) or a ‘scientific practice’ (Kitcher 1993). However, the Darwin's Darwinism, which my opponent defends by her definition, is an outdated and extremely simplistic set of family of theories related by a shared ontology, methodology and goals; and through time, it consists of a lineage of such theories (3).In fact, the theory of evolution that I am arguing against has largely diminished in its influence on the current state of research in biology, evolution, genetics and other modern scientific fields. "The Darwin-Darwinism relation is in certain respects a causal relation, in the sense that Darwin influenced the debates that followed him. But there is also something more: a kind of isomorphism between Darwin's Darwinism and historical Darwinism. It is as though Darwin's own contribution has constrained the conceptual and empirical development of evolutionary biology ever after" (Gayon 2003, 241). In other words, Gayon states that Darwinism has serious limitations and lost its relevance to become the only main theory of evolution. Besides, even though the historical Darwinism has imitated original Darwinism, it is different from the Darwin's Darwinism. It has brought down constraining limitations and has further evolved, suggested better perspective and basis for synthesis of ideas . To further advance the debate, genetic variation, natural selection and Mendelian inheritance have come together in the early 20th century in the form of population genetics. That has ended the eclipse of Darwinism and brought into perspective non-Darwinian theories of evolution (4). Modern and post-modern synthesises have reconciled fields of studies into plural integrative shapes, forms and patterns. In particular, molecular biology, the study of prokaryotes and the resulting tree of life, and genomics will play a more crucial role to explain evolution and a more reasonable theory for life.Yes, indeed, we have learnt the core principles that Darwin has brought into perspective. In fact, the scientific research has tremendously advanced from 19th century. The sets of concept provided by Darwin are not sufficient to advance our understanding of life on Earth. More refined and progressive theories and methods of scientific research are better suited for the detailed and comprehensive explanation of life on Earth. (1) https://plato.stanford.edu...(2) https://en.wikipedia.org...(3) https://plato.stanford.edu...(4) https://en.wikipedia.org...(20th_century)