Out of all the information you don't know is it possible for God to exist in that realm

Thanks for offering the debate! I too look forward to your arguments. I guess I'll just jump right in. The evidence you provided for Noah’s flood and Mt Sinai is not evidence. These are stories, Written by news websites and youtubers and they do not cite any actual verifiable sources from what I found. This would certainly be Nobel prize worthy if it were scientifically supported, Because it would uproot a lot of science. In addition to this, We know the flood story was an amalgamation from the parallel story previously written for Giglamesh. In addition, Neither geology or archeology support a global flood incident. You asked for evidence regarding the historicity of the Biblical characters I mentioned. 1) Adam and Eve is now only recognized as a metaphorical story by many Christians. Evolution disproves their existence because it shows homo sapiens did not arise from a single couple. Instead, We evolved from approximately 2-3 thousand of our ancestral species. The Adam and Eve account is just not scientifically supported in any way, Including geo strata layers. 2) Moses & Abraham - there is way too much history to get into on a short debate like this, But here are some historians/scholars you can read up on related the subject. I'd be happy to have a separate debate on this if you want. DM Murdock (Acharya S), Richard Carrier, Robert Price and Bart Ehrman. These authors have studied and written extensively on the subjects, Providing both historicity and verifiable sources. Zoroastrianism is where Hell was amalgamated from. First temple Judaism only mentions Sheol, Which is just a place of darkness where the dead went. It wasn't until after the Persian conquests that the newer "lake of fire" themed Hell originated, Followed by Dante’s Inferno. This was borrowed from the ideas in Zoroastrianism (the Persian religion). Whether or not Giglamesh existed or not is irrelevant. The point is, The Noah's flood story is not unique and it obviously was borrowed from this. There are many things in the Bible that tie into real history, Such as Jerusalem - it's a real place. But finding things littered in the Bible that are true does not make the entire Bible true, Or the underlying myth it's portraying. I've heard Matt Dillahunty say something along the lines of "Just because NY is real, It does not mean Spiderman is". This is an identical analogy to what I'm saying. You mentioned the Exodus can be found in the natural world. This is just incorrect, Because it never happened (Moses wasn't a real character). In addition, It doesn't take 40 years of being lost in a desert with God's help to find your way from point A to B, When it should only take weeks. Furthermore, There is no historicity from that area to back up the Exodus account either. That being said, What I meant about miracles was the obvious ones - magic. Omniscience and free will cannot logically coexist because they dichotomize each other. A God cannot know the future if the future has not yet been "decided" by the agents of free will. If God does know the future, Then the agents do not actually have free will (fatalism). Your suggestion of interlude for the omnipotence argument missed the point. The point was, It's an infinite regression. God creates a heavy rock, Lifts it, Creates a heavier rock, Lifts it, Etc. Logically, It cannot make sense, So applying that to something is illogical and its application makes the thing you applied it to illogical. A 6-thousand-year-old earth is impossible and it's unscientific. There are so many arguments to demonstrate this but 2 good examples are radiometric dating and red shift. Creationism is equally impossible as evolution singlehandedly disproves it. All species evolved from common ancestors and this is supported by many lines of science. Magic would be anything supernatural that alters or changes the course of events in reality (turning water to wine, Raising the dead, Talking snakes, Speaking universes into existence, Etc). Thanks for your time and I look forward to your rebuttals!