God is Real

On Einstein / Scientists' Belief in GodWhether or not Einstein was an "atheist" depends on your definition of God, and your definition of atheism. Einstein said, "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of all that exists, but not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and doings of mankind." He also said, "From the viewpoint of a Jesuit priest I am, of course, and have always been an atheist." [1] Obviously, Einstein did not believe in the God of Christianity. I never made the claim that "no scientists believe in God." Many scientists believe in God, especially scientists who lived hundreds of years ago. Scientists subscribed to all sorts of unscientific nonsense back then. Isaac Newton believed in God; he also believed in alchemy. Today, in 2016, nobody considers alchemy to be a legitimate scientific pursuit. I am certain you could come up with a sizable list of scientists, past and present, who believe in God. This would not change the fact that these scientists are in the minority. Unless you can show me the results of a comparable study that contradicts the results of the study I provided, you must concede that most scientists do not believe in God. God of the GapsI readily admit that there are mysteries in nature that science has not yet found the answer to."Many people are overconfident enough to think that if they cannot explain something, it must be inexplicable and therefore a true mystery of the paranormal...There are many genuine unsolved mysteries in the universe and it is okay to say, 'We do not yet know but someday perhaps we will.' The problem is that most of us find it more comforting to have certainty, even if it is premature, than to live with unsolved or unexplained mysteries." [2]"Science does not explain everything, so there is always room for other explanations and the believer is easily convinced that the explanation is God. However, the God of the gaps argument by itself fails, at least as a scientific argument, unless the phenomenon in question is not only currently scientifically inexplicable but can be shown to forever defy natural description. God can only show up by proving to be necessary, with science equally proven to be incapable of providing a plausible account of the phenomenon based on natural or material processes alone." [3]"God did it" is not a scientific theory. It's a pseudo-explanation. It applies everywhere, and explains nothing. Once upon a time, people had no scientific explanation for night and day. People like you would have said, "Oh you can't explain it? Well I can: God did it!" Luckily, there were people who would not accept "God did it" as a sufficient explanation. Those people went on to discover the genuine explanation for night and day: the earth is round, and it rotates. You said: "...please don't criticize my support of the fathers of science and talk about how long they've been dead and then also quote scientists from the stone age." I quoted a book from 2007. I don't know what you're talking about here. Debunking the Law of Biogenesis ArgumentBiogenesis is "the theory, opposed to spontaneous generation, that living matter always arises by the agency of preexisting living matter." [4] Here's another definition: the law of biogenesis is "the observation that living things only come from other living things, by reproduction (e.g. a spider lays eggs, which develop into spiders). That is, life does not arise from non-living material, which was the position held by spontaneous generation." [5] God is supernatural. God is not "living matter" or a "living thing" made out of "living material" who birthed humanity through physical reproduction. The law of biogenesis does not apply.On EnergyYou said, "Energy has been proven to be eternal, connected to all freed electrons which means it is everywhere, knows everything and is timeless. If God controls and connects all freed electrons and have all of these attributes, then he would in fact be GOD, wouldn't he? Science itself has proven these things about energy."Sounds like you're anthropomorphizing energy. In what sense does energy "know" anything? Furthermore, you're making some irrational leaps here. Energy is eternal, therefore energy is the personal creator God of the Bible? That doesn't make any sense. SOURCES[1] Quotes from Einstein found in The Believing Brain, by Michael Shermer. Pages 182-183[2] Michael Shermer, Why People Believe Weird Things [3] Victor Stenger, God: The Failed Hypothesis[4] http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...;[5] https://en.wikipedia.org...