Ecstasy should be downgraded to a class B drug

First I'll attack then rebuild. The first so caled "fallacy" is no fallacy. Something can be increasing in popularity without it actually being popular yet. Once again however this creates hardship in this debate because ecstasy is not so popular in America, especially depending on the state. For example Utah, my homestate, ecstasy is HUGE. In fact, Utah is the 3rd largest rave scene in the world. However, in Oklahoma I practically have had to introduce it since no one has any idea about it. But debating about the street popularity of the drug is pretty irrelivant, and if I was the one to bring in it I'll drop that arguement as it is insenificant. The point I was trying to more so push was it is not known as well scientific-wise. The damages, the effects, the chemical breakdowns, they are not so well known. If you look around online, you'll find numerous half-finished reports on ecstasy since it is not researched so well. All I am pointing out is the danagers are not all the way known, so therefore since it is a 'mysterous drug' currently, it would seem reasonable to leave it as class A till more information is gathered. While I do agree that individuals do not cause harm to others on the most part, but I believe those on LSD usually do not either. The reason LSD more so in on the class A scale is because the effect it puts on your body, the "trip" if you will. That is similar to ecstasy. The trip is pretty hardcore, and thus fits more on a class A drug. There is also the fact ectsasy is contructed by people who use the drug or apart of the drug world. I highly doubt a scientist with a PHD in chemisty is making your ecstasy pills. More than likely, its someone with a fried brain because they sample there own goods. People like the ones you seen on the internet in meth labs and such. Thus, theses are people with not only no previous chemisty or pharmisutical background, but people with a lesser mind from either repeated abuse of the substance they make or because they are ON the substance while making it. For example, if I was making a hundred cookies for my friends, I would eat a couple of those cookies. Thus, since the proceedure making ecstasy is dangerous, the drug is even more dangerous, thus leaving it a class A. Weed and Shrooms are not class A a lot so because they are natural and grown, unlike ecstasy, meth, and LSD My opponent brings up alcohol as being more dangerous. I attack this with the simple versus of trips. Anyone who has done both (I'm guessing my opponent has) can tell you ecstasy is much, much more extreme in its trip. However this is not a debate over alcohol, but ecstasy and should therefore stay on ecstasy. I finish with a question to my opponent, and that is what are the benefits from taking ecstasy to a class B over a class A? You say it'll lower the punishments and etc, well that is negative. Your allowing more people to get away with it, and you will increase the flow of the drug, hense further fueling the drug industry which in turn further promotes crime and poverty. All these come from lowering it, however tell me how turning this drug to a class B will do anything benefitial to society. Maybe your points are valid for turning it into a class B (not saying they are), maybe it does fit more as a class B (however I disagree), but none of that beneifts society. It may benefit the 'partier' and the drug lords, but neither of those produce moral worth or help society and the greater good. By agree with the Aff, you are in turn harming society and thus humanity as a whole. Thankyou, sorry for the delayed responce, I'll try to speed it up. *I'd also like to state the Oklahoma law I only said as a general knowledge I should have stated that because it was no way linked to the arguement, my bad.