It is beyond a reasonable doubt that flight 77 hit the Pentagon

I will first briefly address in order the last points posted by my opponent and then present in summary an alternative scenario of Flight 77 consistent with the best evidence now available as I promised I would do. A) My statement in Round 3 Part A is: "I cited the unanimity of agreement of the 13 eyewitnesses only to establish the certitude of the north side approach of the plane." My use of the term "unanimity" within this particular statement is not incorrect. It applies strictly to the group of 13 eyewitnesses. What is crucial about the testimony of Pentagon police officer Roosevelt Roberts Jr. is what he said he saw and when he saw it, not what he thought he had seen. Since, according to his testimony, he believed a plane had crashed into the building causing an explosion, of course he would have thought the plane he saw just seconds later flying low over the south parking area was "another plane". Roberts stated in his recorded testimony for the Library of Congress and his recorded interview with Citizen Investigation Team that, "I was in south parking, and I was at the east loading dock when I ran outside and saw the low-flying aircraft above the parking lot. It looked like to me at that time a large aircraft-liner. (CIT: Okay. Did it have propellers, or did it have jet engines?) It looked like jet engines, at that time. (CIT: Jet engines. Okay, do you remember how many seconds it was when you heard the explosion and then saw that plane?) Maybe . . . ten seconds tops. (CIT: So you heard the explosion and ten seconds later you were outside and you were able to see that plane?) Correct. You could see that plane just as clear as day. Couldn't miss it. (CIT: What color was it; do you remember?) It was, to me at that time, it looked like it was silver in color. (CIT: Like silver in color; but you saw it over the south parking lot?) Right, around the lane one area, and it was like banking just above the light poles like. Dismissing Roberts' testimony because he thought he had seen another plane is a convenient way to avoid confronting it. http://z3.invisionfree.com... B) The source cited makes no mention anywhere of bird strikes or of exterior damage being a cause for white smoke coming from a jet engine. C) I stated in Part C of Round 2 that none of the pieces of wreckage at the Pentagon have been positively identified as being part of American Airlines Flight 77. Lacking accurate measurements of the post-blast positions of the columns on the first floor, whether they were displaced outward or displaced toward the north side would seem to be a subjective judgment of sight, but the crucial point is that they were NOT DISPLACED INWARD by a 200,000 lb airliner that supposedly hit them at 530 mph. I don't need calculations to know this is an incredible anomaly as is the undamaged floor slab. It should have incurred severe visible damage from BOTH the engines and the body of the plane. I mentioned the engines only because they are constructed of harder materials than the rest of the aircraft and would have been first to strike the floor. The 7,000 lb weight of each one may seem relatively insignificant until considering that a major portion of the 200,000 lb plane would have been resting on each engine as it plowed through the building. http://govinfo.library.unt.edu... D) The position of the plane according to the ground-based radio beacon at Reagan National Airport, the most accurate of any method, and recorded in American Airlines 77's Flight Data Recorder has been found to be at variance with the official NTSB directional and altitude data. http://www.youtube.com... E) No DNA or any other type of identification was made "at the crash site" or even a body count on site that I have been able to find. All identification of the bodies of victims was done after transporting them to the Dover Air Force Base mortuary facility with no "chain of custody" procedure followed. I believe 9/11 was a state sponsored false-flag operation. Just who sponsored and planned it and why is too large a subject to expound on here and not essential to the points I want to make, so I will not go into that. Being a false-flag operation, it had to be planned and prepared entirely in secret in order to deceive the vast majority of the public and, judging from its results, it was a huge and masterful deception. And like any deception, in order for it to succeed, all evidence relating to it had to be controlled to the greatest extent possible and any evidence that could not be controlled had to be destroyed, preferably even before it could become evidence. There was greater potential for things to go wrong crashing a plane into the Pentagon than at the World Trade Center. Deliberately crashing a multi-engine jetliner into the west side of the Pentagon at ground level in order to destroy the office of Resource Services and Budget, the immediate objective, would mean flying through a virtual obstacle course of buildings, light poles, overhead highway signs, and construction equipment that would demand a highly skilled pilot and, obviously, one willing to commit suicide. Hani Hanjour, the alleged hijacker pilot of Flight 77 was neither. An honest assessment would indicate his level of piloting expertise was mediocre at best and truly reckless at worst. Hanjour managed to obtain a commercial pilot"s license at the lowest level of certification in April, 1999 after 4 years of study and dropping out of 3 different flight schools. http://wikipedia.org... Since the 9/11 planners were not likely to find a Muslim or anyone of any belief who was an extremely skillful pilot and also fanatically religious enough to volunteer for martyrdom, they were forced for the Pentagon operation to choose between hijacking an airliner electronically with a ground-based autopilot system and flying it into the building by remote control or staging a fake crash with an explosion and fly-over. I believe what forced them to opt for the fly-over was the risk autopiloting presented of crashing outside the building and leaving the plane intact as evidence. If this occurred investigators would not find the remains of Hani Hanjour or any Saudi hijacker in the wreckage of the cockpit and their deception would be revealed. Closing off the area of the Pentagon to be destroyed to conduct major renovations prior to 9/11 would have given operatives the necessary cover to put substantial aircraft wreckage in place and carefully prepare explosive charges to simulate an airliner impact with the building. And this is exactly what occurred. The fact that directional damage to some light poles and fence posts was opposite to the flight path of the plane indicates this was done with explosive charges also. Security video at Dulles shows that Hanjour along with 4 other Saudis boarded AA77. These 5 would have been able to overpower the captain and first officer and take over the cockpit. But who was going to fly the plane? Among the 58 passengers onboard there were 3 fully capable of flying a 757. What are the odds of that? After the fly-over the plane was likely flown to a secure military installation since landing at any civilian airport could have been observed, which would have blown the deception. Everyone onboard had to be killed. One possible way of doing it quickly would have been to have nerve gas automatically released from hidden canisters on the plane as soon as it came to a stop. Sarin-C gas paralyses in 30 seconds and is lethal in 2 minutes. No one would have gotten out of the plane alive. The bodies and all personal effects were removed, taken to a cremation facility and incineated, some completely, some partially. The remains were then transported to Dover Air Force Base mortuary for identification. The plane was dismantled, all identifying components destroyed, and the rest hauled to scrap yards.