Peyton Manning will not win more than 9 games or take the Broncos to the playoffs

Hello everyone! If you've made it this far your almost there, as this is the last speech! As stated earlier, no new arguments are to be brought up in this round. Con will go ahead and address all issues and arguments, however judges, if any new arguments were brought up by pro or con in round 3, please do not weigh them. Con will also look at any new argumentation and still refute it. The order will be as follows:1) Refutations2) Extensions3) Voters/ConclusionWithout further adeu let us begin! REFUTATIONS1. Judges look towards sources on this issue. Pro fails to give sources showing the long-recovery method given by pro against cons argumentation, whereas con clearly shows in round 2, A) 2nd longest streak in NFL history (Consecutive Starts- Source 1)B) Doctors give the OK, meaning FULL recovery, time length is not a factor in this, because now we know for certain it did not take over 1 year, and that his arm and neck are fully recovered according to Source 2, Dr Robert Watkins, and ESPN Analysts who are trained, and skilled in sports analysis.2. PROBLEM- Scroll up to round 2, read the refutations by con, Con states, quote "A common misconception is Reggie Wayne is a Pro-Bowl Reciever. " Clearly, Reggie Wayne has made the pro bowl, but upon further investigation into Cons argument 2, you find that he has ONLY MADE THE PRO BOWL WHEN PEYTON MANNING HAS THROWN FOR A CERTAIN NUMBER OF YARDS. The point Con got across from that argument is Reggie Wayne would not make the pro bowl WITHOUT Peyton Manning, whereas pro tried to say Players like Reggie Wayne were what Manning relied on. Pro failed to refute this argument, and with a source that has no relevance due to a misinterpreted argument, Pro has lost this argument. Nextly, Tim Tebow. First- Peyton Manning still averages 70% or more completed Passes, copare this to Tim Tebow's 1 season 45 Pass completions. Who do you go with? The Veteran or the inexperienced QB who throws and completed only 45% of his passes? Second- My Opponent is actually using an argument that clashes with another one of his arguments. This is true for two reasons.1) Peyton Manning built his team. My opponent concedes this as i do. However, he did not build his team in a day, also my whole adaptation argument goes untouched.2) Compare a Broncos Team, with a great offense even with a Quartback by the name of Tim Tebow who currently has one of the lowest Quarterback Ratings in the game, and somehow come out with an 8-8 record and make the playoffs, to a veteran NFL quarterback who has been given nothing, and able to make something. That Veteran quarterback, Peyton Manning, turned his team around. As stated, Manning boosts the morale of all of his teammates, he makes any wide reciever a pro bowler (Reggie Wayne), he also adapts. Quite Frankly, the Broncos are a gifted team with untapped potential. Peyton Manning is still a step above Tim Tebow (My opponent hasn't stated once Tebow is better) and therefore we can see, if Tebow can go 8-8 with a low QBR and 45% Completions, Manning can easily go past 9-7 with 70% Completions and a top 5 QBR. Thus this argument falls.3. Schedule- Once again- cross apply all argumentation from round 2 by con and put it into round 3, it goes completely untouched. First- Sources are a MUST in this debate, my opponent fails to cite sources on much of his argumentation. Second- 8-8 still hasn't been proven to be "Tough". 3 Teams in the Division went 8-8, and all 3 according to my opponent went 3-3 within their division. My opponent then states, it will be hard for Manning because of the Chargers. Theres two major problems here1) Untapped Potential from the second refutation in round 3- I've stated the Broncos, with Tebow can go 8-8, imagine Manning, a step well above Tim Tebow (Still not refuted therefore it stands and my opponent concedes Manning>Tebow). 2)Chargers vs Colts. The Colts were a different team from the Broncos, My adaptation argument stands, and I've proven through the Underview Manning will have NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER adapting, which went untouched.4. Argument 4 from Round 2 still stands, Manning> Tebow, enough said. My opponent completely concedes this, therefore he agrees 8-8 will be no more, 9-7 will be the MINIMUM and the playoffs are 100% guaranteed, because once again, Manning is far above Tebow. EXTENSIONSExtend the Underview immediately, this proves 3 things1)Adaptation- Any argument against Mannings ability to Adapt are gone, because the Underview was not addressed. 2)Super Bowl Contenders- Enough Said, re-read round two.3) Weather- 300 Sunny days in Denver, with a 60% higher win percentage in sunny stadiums, hmm put those two together and what do you get? An unstoppable Peyton Manning. ConclusionVote off of the 4 Major points, and the concession that Manning is clearly better than Tebow. Next, Extend all adaptation arguments, clearly Manning can adapt. Sources go to Con because pro fails to cite sources in unwarrented claims and evidence. Next, Vote off of the entire underview, this a huge part of the debate that my opponent fails to touch.