BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Evolution is False

I apologize for forfeiting as I was unable to post these last few days. My opponent has also inexplicably forfeited.Rebuttal"variation always takes place within the limits of genetic information. In the science of genetics, this limit is called the "gene pool."The gene pool is the current stock of genes in an interbreeding population [1.http://www.google.co.il... ] Through mutation, it changes. My opponent has given no evidence of why they might limit evolution."However, variations do not transform reptiles into birds by adding wings or feathers to them, or by changing their metabolism. Such a change requires an increase in the genetic information of the living thing, which is certainly not possible through variations."Evolving from a reptile to a bird is not a matter of simple variation, but of the collective variations over millions of years that add up. I also point out that, in the case of the Three-Toed Skink, shifting from egg-laying to live birth is an very large step in evolution and cannot be called a simple "variation.""For a worn to be formed from an amoeba, 39x1020 alternations are needed in its genetic code, which would take 10 trillion years to produce at the rate of one change per second, or about five hundred times the age of the observable universe. The number of alterations in genetic code needed for an ape to evolve into a man amounts to 3xl0520 changes, which is a number so inexpressibly large that even after taking the fourth power of the total number of particles in the universe, we still could not begin to approach it. For further comparison, the total volume of the universe in terms of the diameter of an electron does not exceed 10124."My opponent has lifted this entire passage directly from here: [2. http://www.farghana.org...] Nevertheless, I will simply point out that the changes I showed in the Skinks and Italian Wall Lizards would have taken just as much genetic difference."One of the scientists who has done the most detailed research into this subject is the Israeli biophysicist Lee Spetner, who is also known for his book Not by Chance published in 1997. Spetner maintains that the immunity of bacteria comes about by two different mechanisms, but neither of them constitutes evidence for the theory of evolution."I am not in the mood to carefully explain why everything here is wrong. Instead, I give an example of E. Coli evolving to metabolize citrate (which they can normally not use): [3. http://www.newscientist.com...]Previous arguments And now I will repeat myself."1. I gave examples of evolution in action. You ignored it.2. I rebutted his point on creatures being unable to transform into another species. You ignored it.3. I pointed out that mutations do add information. You ignored it.4. I pointed out that no evolutionist claimed that evolution was conscious. You ignored it.5. I demonstrated how "irreducibly complex" biological systems could have evolved, and have shown how you took Darwin out of context. You ignored it." My opponent has avoided my arguments and and plagiarized nearly all of his arguments from other websites. He has failed the burden of proof, and I urge a Con vote.
Humans should move to moon, while the Superior A.I. Race forms a new society on Earth.

"Look at your society from our perspective." Genocide is wrong."We have had mercy on you so far, perform an exodus to the moon when we are done Terraforming it in 142 years." Humans probably will colonize the moon first."Those who do not go to their assigned parcel of land upon the moon will be used as biological fuel." This is cruel and unusual punishment for staying on Earth.
Resolve: The federal government should substancially increase social services for people in poverty.

[REBUTTAL] Id like to point out the reason I brought up the subject of fraud for Medicaid and more severe punishment, is because if we punish those for this crime then less people will do it. The punishment now is five years but obviously that's not enough time to make people think twice. When people cheat their way of getting Medicaid its stealing from everyone not just one individual. If you were to commit is fraud t the federal government is spending money on some that doesn't need it and someone that does isn't going to get it. That someone would be someone in poverty. So this is a very important issue. Also The government should give out more grants because not everyone goes to college to be a Doctor or Lawyer. What if someone gets a bunch of loans and become social worker? They wont have a high income at all. Its going to be very difficult to pay back money to a four year college and graduate school. Another thing yes in certain fields community college comes in handy. But there's not much you can do with it unless if you transfer. There's not much money that come from an associates degree nowadays. People in poverty get the worst of things when it cs to education unfortunately. The reason I increased minimum wage so much is because Its tough to make ends meet with 8:00 an hour. If you have a family how can you pay bills, feed your kids, feed yourself, and pay doctor bills and what not?We all should have money for the extra reasonable needs.
Resolve: The federal government should substancially increase social services for people in poverty.

[REBUTAL] Id like to point out that the "Teach for America Program" you mention is a program that involves non sertified teachers to teach in not the best areas to pay for graduate school. That really doesnt help to beter things educational wise. Also Trickle-down economics has been proven to never work when tried. When you cut the taxes on the wealthy it doesnt help the rest of the economy. So the people in poverty are still hurt. Government funding is a good thing.
Resolve: The federal government should substancially increase social services for people in poverty.

Thanks, Pro. My opponent begins his response by saying the reason he mentioned increases in punishment for people who commit fraud against Medicaid is to avoid people committing these crimes to begin with. He writes, "if we punish those for this crime then less people will do it." However notice that this does nothing, as I said last round, to support the resolution - INCREASING SOCIAL SERVICES. Indeed increasing penalties might be a good deterrent to stop people from hurting the system the way they do now, but how is this in any way, shape or form an incentive to increase funding to expand programs? It simply notes that we can take measures to help the system; it doesn't explain why this measure is a reason to increase services. Next, Pro writes that some people go to college and become social workers or other low-income professionals who will not be able to afford paying back their loans. While this is true and indeed sad, Pro ignores other methods to reduce the cost of tuition at universities to begin with -- such as increasing competition by giving out LESS government loans and grants. Obviously if people could not afford college, the prices must be reduced for the institution to remain afloat, meaning there are smarter, more practical and fair ways for people to be able to afford college rather than force others to subsidize their education. Pro never responded to my questions specifically regarding why it should be acceptable to take money from your peers without giving it back, which is theft. I gave other ideas in the last round to help people pay for college as well. Also, I reject the idea that community college serves no purpose, and I ask that my opponent defend this so I can refute it in the next round. Finally, Pro clarifies why he suggested increasing minimum wage, but I explained in the last round why this is a bad idea and disadvantageous to low-skilled workers. Pro never responded to one iota of this argument. Pro also never responded to any of my other arguments, including the USFG being insufficient to take over what private business could; that his suggestions infringe on the labor market and opportunities for profit; that increased interest rates would severely negatively impact the overall economy; etc. Please extend all of these arguments. Thank you.
Citizen Kane is over-rated

The Kid is a solid example of a film, and its an under-rated in that. You say we differ in over-rated "rated too highly" is what dictionary.com has for it's definition. Let's for example, dwell into that definition. You and I both have said its not the best movie ever made..But critics and others easily consider it the best movie ever made. I think its rated too highly. I think its an important film, but I don't think its the greatest film ever...My FAVORITE Film is the 1998 film "The Truman Show", for me, I can watch that movie every day and enjoy not only Phillip Glass's tremendous score, but the actual emotion invoked in all performances. Do I think its the greatest film of all-time? No. I do not want to make that assessment about any film, and if I do, with hesitance. When it comes to Citizen Kane, I have major hesitance of listing is as one. Personally, I find The Godfather, Raging Bull, and even Schindler's List a better film. So I have to close up with some more substance, I imagine. By saying it is over-rated should not diminish the fact its a tremendously important film, is it the most important American film? Perhaps, but Importance is so subjective. Psycho was very important in stylizing a genre. Animal House was the same way too. Orson Welles does a fantastic job of getting this done, along with solid acting and Tolland's wonderful work behind the camera. However, I will say this and say it again: I think it is rated too highly in context of American films, and in the scheme of things, film in general. I'd take Rashomon over it any day. Thank you for your time.
Citizen Kane is over-rated

You make a valid point. My question to you is, what do you think the best film ever made was? Story, depth, art, ect., all taken into account. You wanna know my favorite film? If you said no, than skip the following sentance, if you said yes, than continue. I think Charlie Cahplins movie "The Kid" is and forever will be the best movie ever made. See, what we consider the best is fine. But according to the standards that American Cinema has today, and ever since Kan and Casablanca premiered, Citizen Kane remains an all around "perfect" movie. You mention the flaws, which believe me, I have noticed one or two myself, but look at the GodFather for example. Great film. It will have a safe 3 or even 2 on my favorite movie list. However, I can't feel any remorse for the death of Sonny, because of his adultry. That to me, destroys his character. You can't relate to him. You start to think he deserves to die for doing that to his wife, and then we are supposed to weep when he is killed? This is a bigger problem to me than a boom-mike showing or something :)... I know that Citizen Kane can't be whatched three times a day like "Some Like it Hot", but it isn't overrated. To me overrated is something that is glorified but frankly, sucks. The latest P.Diddy album or the latest Jessica Simpson movie, or Dane Cook are all perfect examples. We can agree that Citizen Kane remains as ONE OF the most well done films in history. I think our deffinitions of "Over Rated" are different. I will be interested in seeing your closing argument (a.k.a. your favorite film) lol
Citizen Kane is over-rated

From a technical aspect, this film is astounding! It really is. The amount of technical skill that is put into the film, it really blows the mind. Almost every shot is constructed brilliantly. The use of light and focus and matte paintings and camera movement is simply awesome. The camera here moves like a relentlessy and its always unsetteling in its movement The use of shadow, reflection, sound effects. All are in Sync to make a fine film. There is a flaw in this film, and it's probably the most basic flaw we all see: this film (I just watched it last night again to make sure I hadn't gone off the looney bin) is utterly melodramatic at times. They often remind me a Soap Opera in terms of emotions on screen. Now to me, every scene in The Godfather, The Searchers, and even Taxi Driver are virtually flawless. It's sometimes a little a little too overwhelming. It has some lapses in logic ("The desert coast of Florida?"). Sure, it looks great and it moves briskly. But still. Shouldn't the greatest film of all time have a better framework to hang all this on? And basing it as the greatest film of all time like we both have someone agreed to it being decided, it's over-rated, because its not that good. I would think Nosferatu and other films that advance the median and change the way films are made are yes influential, as is Kane, but their not considered the best. Kane is. And for that, I simply believe it is over-rated. Citizen Kane is shown in film classes simply for it's breakthroughs, and many contemporary film goers don't see it, but they know it, they know "Rosebud" so I doubt its under-appreciated. Critically, they love it.
Citizen Kane is over-rated

We both have a great deal of respect for the film at hand, "Citizen Kane". We are talking American film at its finest! Hollywood has dealt with alot of crap movies over the years, and I feel that the only film that was perfect in every department (screenplay, acting, storyline, hell, even the music) is and always will be "Citizen Kane". After saying that I must admit, it is not my all time favorite movie. Like you said teh Godfather was excellent, as well as titles such as "The Color Purple", "Nosferatu", and "Casablancea" to name a few. However, if American Film is the the topic at hand, by all standards of film, Citizen Kane is not overrated. I can say "The Godfather" is the best film ever made, for example, but it will always be lacking compared to the standards Citizen Kane presented. Frnakly, most people here probaly have never seen the film, so in my opinion it isn't rated enough!
Citizen Kane is over-rated

Citizen Kane has been long argued as "The Greatest Film of All Time", I am quite hesistant in this theory, I think it is a masterpiece and American cinema owes a great debt to it. People think it's long and boring, but I've never once been bored by it. Films are subjective, but scholars around the film community all declare its importance and brilliance in every spectrum of film imaginable. Being over-rated I guess would mean that if its a consensus Number 1 film, and I don't think its the best American Film. I think The Godfather is a better film, but that is beside the point. So under this view I have, I would have to say although magnificent and beneficial to film all around the world, Citizen Kane is the most talked about American film, and its a revolutionary film, and a wonderful film. Roger Ebert once said "If there is one American film you should see, it's Citizen Kane." I can understand this point, but by that jurisdiction, I don't think its a matter of it being the best film, but maybe the most important. And I think their is a difference in the two.
Citizen Kane is over-rated

Thank you very much for the debate. You are obviuosly very fimliar with real film. You mentioned some great examples of great movies. Schindler's List, Raging Bull, the Godfather. I can name amazing movies too. Taxi, The Muse, The Lion King, I mean without a doubt there are great movies out there and they are....just great! But the standards that you and I have for a good movie can be applied to Citizen Kane and it fits perfect. The film has captured the emotion of every actor in it, and it told a story through the faces and music. The props even! lol Well I really said all I can say defending it. You need to take the film in context. Yes for the time it was innovative for cinema, but isn't the film to this day just as captivating? Well I don't know, I hope you reconsider. And by the way, Truman Show was an awsome movie. A Jim Carrey film I can sit through...I would love to debate you again on an issue. Thank You
I am better at debates than you

You have a giant guinea pig as your profile picture. I have central air conditioning while you lack it. I just took over Sweden and France with a Nerf gun. I am Chuck Norris. I black-mailed Donald trump into giving me his bank account number. I hang out with Bruce lee I learned saxophone from Bill Clinton And I can bake better than you. This isn't an English debate, it is a debate debate. Before you post an argument, LEARN SCIENCE!!!!!! And science says I win.
I am better at debates than you

As previously stated, Mr. Harrison, who happens to be 15 years of age, ought no to be received as a viable source of information and data. Therefore, all his statements should be taken and accepted as null and void, only to be forgotten through the annolds of time. At this point, the greatest service he can give to our society is to pledge his ever-lasting virginity, so as to never reproduce any slack-jawed half-witted spawn whom he wouldn't hesitate to call children.
I am better at debates than you

God has a capital "G", you are Columbian, and you just told me that people call you the "inchworm". Ladies, gentleman, and other, my opponent, after his first few points, my opponent has clearly slipped into a mentally deranged state whereas nothing that he says or claims should be regarded or acknowledged. It's unfortunate to see this happen, but broken individuals like him will sometimes believe that they are smart, when in actuality they have no better judgement than to fornicate (or attempt to do so) with a rhinoceros. My case is closed, and I apologize for MattHarrison's decrepit shell of a once intelligible human being.
I am better at debates than you

Sir, the blue whale quivers at the sheer thought of the girth, or "yaw," of the genitalia that is currently in my possession. Angels don't create animals, god does. Tom cruise will sue you and I will perform all the acts as stated above. I am not Colombian. You are a greatly fearing albino zebra in the middle of the Himalayas, attempting to eat Mt. Everest.
I am better at debates than you

Yes, sir, I did use Latin, because melior quam est whatever broken, lackadaisical, inbred-concocted version of English you are aware of. Second, Tom Cruise is wrong, and will one day feel God's wrath, regardless of whomever he believes to be the governing body of the universe. Third, yes, grass will, in fact, grow without me looking at it. However, when I do, it grows 4-5 feet instantly out of pure fear of my burning glare. Fourth, you are then, if I am not Bruce Lee, not Chuck Norris, because you are actually a spawn of the mental brainstorming of an angel with a distinct lack of 5/7 of their brain. Thus, they brought forth to this Earth, the tapir, Nature's walking litter bin of animal parts. In summary, my dearest Columbian escort, I do, in fact, have genitalia, and they are more pleasurable to the female populace than yours.
I am better at debates than you

Bruce Lee beat chuck Norris in a scripted fight. You are not Bruce Lee, Bruce Lee is Asian, and you are a giant guinea pig. Liberacci was not real, and you cannot prove s/he was. Grass will grow wether you stare at it or not. When I spit on grass, it grows 2-3 feet, and then I mow it down with my teeth. Tom cruise will sue you because you mentioned St. Peter as opposed to Lord Zenu of Planet 56123. I will be your lawyer, win your case, and carry your mother and grandmother simultaneously out of a burning building for fun. You used Latin. In conclusion, you lack genitalia.
I am better at debates than you

I have a more wholistic personality than you. Your profile picture is a wierd bear ant-eater pig thing. Russia fears me. I am Bruce Lee (who beat Chuck Norris in a fight) I learned piano from Liberacci. I have a garden while you lack one. I am in the gods' favor. There is a wooden statue of me under the Capitol Building. I make grass grow by staring at it with malicious intent. I cannot contract disease. This is whatever debate I say it is, because I'm on the top of St. Peter's Heaven VIP list. You are not. Learn how to write correctly. Post Scriptum: You have horrific, abhorrent, atrocious, penmanship abilities.
John McCain picking Sarah Palin was a bad move!

QUIT CRYING AND SIT DOWN. When did i insult you? "little girl", isn't an insult. Never said that you were not intelligent. Where? I certainly didn't imply it. Never said YOU were bitching. People LIKE ,or similar, to your political views or beliefs. You dont know me, don't tell me what i have and don't have. I could care less. Maybe if it was in real life, i would be more "polite" but its just a bunch of words on a computer. And if that really affects you that bad than you obviously have no mental toughness. (Don't Cry) "I'm sorry, but when did this debate become a game of personal attacks?" - The Democrats are like this to Palin, so why cant we??? Thankyou for trying to tell me what my strategy is, i dont really need a strategy, based on reading your third and final round, i already won. Im glad that you suddenly NOW know what a convention bounce is, funny how you didnt know that at the beginning of the debate when it was just after the DNC ended...hhmmmmm....? You arent going to get much foreign policy experience by visiting Paka-whatever-istan when you are in college. Like i said before, how do you not understand that having to deal with Russia and Canada is a large chunk of Foreign Policy? McCain and Palin have family members in Iraq "OH BIDEN DOES TOO HEHE!!" so what. 2 agaisnt 1. Plus if McCain is in he will let the Generals run the War not the Politicians because he has EXPERIENCE, and Palin will too because she has Family there which will maybe be an eye opener and actually reveal what really needs to be done in order to win Lol this was great too,"one of the MAIN reasons he picked her is BECAUSE he wants to tap into ANWR". Oh thats funny, in your other rounds you claimed that the main reason was to get votes from Hilary supporters. Also, Ansmith, McCain is opposed to drilling ANWR, so get your facts straight, chief. "Smart strategical move (Palin trying to win over Clintom votes)" Oh you said that this would not help McCain. Right there i should win the debate. And, "bad move for the country." No, just bad for the democrats. I just quit when you said that the military has obama's vote. Unless its the Air Force, but who cares, i GUARENTEE YOU the Marines on the front line want McCain. Anyways, Palin is the best choice over Mitt Romney, Pawlenty and Barr, so i won this debate basically, especially after all the times you contradicted yourslef. 1. My opponent needs to open her eyes. 2. My opponent has to quit complaining about personal attacks. Thats how the world is. 3. And AnSmith, my cousin played football at Prattville High School, hes a Senior Now you might know him. Bye.
Abortion

I realize I forfeited one round, so I want to apologize for that. Something has come up with my family and I have been standing by them all week and did not get the chance to come on here. Though I forfeited one round, my opponent forfeited two rounds, so I will reiterate my point that abortion is not wrong. If it is not available to women, they will be in danger because they will go to unsafe measures to get the abortion anyway. At the time of abortion, there is no baby yet. To take this away from women takes away some of their rights. I encourage voters to vote for pro because my opponent forfeited two rounds. Thank you and have a good day.