God most likely exists

Con says thermodynamics has nothing to do with the order in the universe. However, the second law of thermodynamics clearly states entropy tends to increase. Entropy, according to the Oxford dictionary, is: "A thermodynamic quantity representing the unavailability of a system"s thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work, often interpreted as the degree of disorder or randomness in the system." (http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...) Yes, thermodynamics has to do with heat. But order is basically conversion of heat energy into mechanical work. And plenty of this heat energy would have to be available for a Big Bang to happen. I am not denying the Big Bang. I understand there is plenty of evidence supporting this theory, and the Bible actually talks about the expansion of the universe. However, everything with a beginning must have something causing it to begin. So, the Bang must have had a Banger, an origin with no beginning. Once we understand this, it is easy to identify who the creator of all things is. Con understands natural selection works with what it already has, that is good. However, he still wants to believe that, through favorable mutations, single-celled organisms evolved into fish, and so on and so forth. Come on, Con, you can't just ignore the observable evidence against this silly theory. That's what science is based on, observations! And what do we see? "There have been a few arguable cases of information-gaining mutations [...] there would need to be billions of them. The fact is, we don't observe this in nature, but rather we see the opposite, organisms losing information. Organisms are changing, but the change is in the wrong direction! How can losses of information add up to a gain?" (The New Answers Book Volume 2). You said it yourself: "On your argument about HGPS, you are correct, a lot of mutations, most mutations actually, are not, in fact favorable". Con also said: "I saw your argument that said that if those creatures evolved, then how do we still have the creatures that they supposedly evolved from?". Con must be seeing things, because that was never one of my arguments, so I wont bother rebutting this; it's not support for the evolution theory. The chances of God existing are not as ridiculous as you claim. And saying amoeba had billions of years to evolve into the complex life today does not cover the holes of that theory. We have seen what science suggests. Now let's see the evidence. The following quotations are from the book, What Does the Bible REALLY Teach? Chapter 2 The Bible"A Book From God: (BEGINNING OF QUOTE) The Bible was written over a 1,600-year period. Its writers lived at different times and came from many walks of life. Some were farmers, fishermen, and shepherds. Others were prophets, judges, and kings. The Gospel writer Luke was a doctor. Despite the varied backgrounds of its writers, the Bible is harmonious from beginning to end. The first book of the Bible tells us how mankind"s problems began. The last book shows that the whole earth will become a paradise, or garden. All the material in the Bible covers thousands of years of history and relates in some way to the unfolding of God"s purpose. The harmony of the Bible is impressive, but that is what we would expect of a book from God. The Bible is scientifically accurate. It even contains information that was far ahead of its time. For example, the book of Leviticus contained laws for ancient Israel on quarantine and hygiene when surrounding nations knew nothing about such matters. At a time when there were wrong ideas about the shape of the earth, the Bible referred to it as a circle, or sphere. (Isaiah 40:22) The Bible accurately said that the earth "hangs on nothing." (Job 26:7) Of course, the Bible is not a science textbook. But when it touches on scientific matters, it is accurate. Is this not what we would expect of a book from God? The Bible is also historically accurate and reliable. Its accounts are specific. They include not only the names but also the ancestry of individuals. * In contrast to secular historians, who often do not mention the defeats of their own people, Bible writers were honest, even recording their own failings and those of their nation. In the Bible book of Numbers, for instance, the writer Moses admits his own serious error for which he was severely reproved. (Numbers 20:2-12) Such honesty is rare in other historical accounts but is found in the Bible because it is a book from God. The Bible contains numerous prophecies, many of which have already been fulfilled. Consider an example. Through the prophet Isaiah, who lived in the eighth century B.C.E., Jehovah foretold that the city of Babylon would be destroyed. (Isaiah 13:19; 14:22, 23) Details were given to show just how the city would be conquered. Invading armies would dry up Babylon"s river and march into the city without a battle. That is not all. Isaiah"s prophecy even named the king who would conquer Babylon"Cyrus."Isaiah 44:27"45:2. Some 200 years later"on the night of October 5/6, 539 B.C.E."an army encamped near Babylon. Who was its commander? A Persian king named Cyrus. The stage was thus set for the fulfillment of an amazing prophecy. But would the army of Cyrus invade Babylon without a battle, as foretold? The Babylonians were holding a festival that night and felt secure behind their massive city walls. Meanwhile, Cyrus cleverly diverted the water of the river that flowed through the city. Soon the water was shallow enough for his men to cross the riverbed and approach the walls of the city. But how would Cyrus" army get past Babylon"s walls? For some reason, on that night the doors to the city were carelessly left open! Regarding Babylon, it was foretold: "She will never be inhabited, nor will she reside for generation after generation. And there the Arab will not pitch his tent, and no shepherds will let their flocks lie down there." (Isaiah 13:20) This prophecy did more than predict a city"s fall. It showed that Babylon would be desolated permanently. You can see evidence of the fulfillment of these words. The uninhabited site of ancient Babylon"about 50 miles [80 km] south of Baghdad, Iraq"is proof that what Jehovah spoke through Isaiah has been fulfilled: "I will sweep her with the broom of annihilation.""Isaiah 14:22, 23. Considering how the Bible is a book of reliable prophecy is faith strengthening, is it not? After all, if Jehovah God has fulfilled his past promises, we have every reason to be confident that he will also fulfill his promise of a paradise earth. (Numbers 23:19) Indeed, we have "hope of the everlasting life which God, who cannot lie, promised before times long lasting.""Titus 1:2. Because the Bible is inspired of God, it is "beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight." (2 Timothy 3:16) Yes, the Bible is a practical book. It reflects a keen understanding of human nature. No wonder, for its Author, Jehovah God, is the Creator! He understands our thinking and emotions better than we do. Furthermore, Jehovah knows what we need in order to be happy. He also knows what pathways we should avoid. Consider Jesus" speech called the Sermon on the Mount, recorded in Matthew chapters 5 to 7. In this masterpiece of teaching, Jesus spoke on a number of topics, including the way to find true happiness, how to settle disputes, how to pray, and how to have the proper view of material things. Jesus" words are just as powerful and practical today as they were when he spoke them. Some Bible principles deal with family life, work habits, and relationships with others. The Bible"s principles apply to all people, and its counsel is always beneficial. The wisdom found in the Bible is summarized by God"s words through the prophet Isaiah: "I, Jehovah, am your God, the One teaching you to benefit yourself.""Isaiah 48:17. (END OF QUOTE) What more evidence do you need? God's power is right there in the Bible! I cannot ignore the many fulfilled prophecies and science discovered at a later date, and neither should you or ANYONE who cares about the TRUTH. Concerning your question about the inbreeding, according to you, we have a common ancestor. So, really, we inbreed. We are just far from being related to the person we marry that misconfiguration is unlikely. Well, the animals in Noah's ark were closer to perfection, a lot healthier than the animals now, and less likely to have genetic mutations from inbreeding. Same with the humans. As time passed, they gradually became more imperfect, but the population was also increasing, so inbreeding among close relatives was not necessary. If God exists, he could have sent Jesus to the womb of Mary, no sperm necessary. SO, that's an invalid argument as well. I'll make this clear right now, I am not a creationist, if you are referring to those who want to believe in a young Earth. I am a Jehovah's Witness. I accept evolution (not the theory), and Big Bang. But there is no undeniable evidence to back up the silly theory of evolution. And, if there is any, it is your duty to share it right now, you could win a noble prize! ;) I eagerly await Con's response. Thank you.