It is impossible for there to exist a being who is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent.

there is not much to expand upon. I am simply stating why a being who is all powerful, all loving, and all knowing cannot exist. It is you who are trying to prove that such a being can exist. "An All-loving, or infinitely good God cannot overrule freewill without committing evil. " Free will is actually impossible with a being who is completely omniscient. This being knows everything that everyone will ever do. It knew that we would have this debate, therefore it is impossible for us to not have this debate. Free will disproves omniscience. So, to use the free will defense is to disprove the existence of the all powerful, all loving, and all knowing being. "The first being that had freewill from God did the first act of evil. He convinced others to do evil. He convinced humans to do evil. " You have not proven that this being ever existed. I am assuming you are reffering to Adam from the Bible. You must prove he ever existed before using him to make a point. And wasn't it a she(Eve) who allegedly did the first act of evil? And also please show how even if this person did the first act of evil, how does that cause everyone else to commit evil? "The evil in the world is perpetuated upon people who reject the guidance and transcendent moral value system of the all-loving and infinitely good God. " Are you saying that Christians can never do bad? "They reject this by using their freewill. " First, I already showed how the existence of free will disproves the existence of your all powerful being. And so you are saying that the only way to be good is to be a slave and a robot? "God will right all of the wrongs by judging those people who chose to perpetuate evil in the world. He will punish the evildoers for their deeds. " You cannot appeal to divine judgement without actually proving that the Christian god and an afterlife exists. "God has enemies who perpetuate evil outside of the Free Will of Man by utilizing their own free Will. God also does not overrule his enemies' use of their free will even though they overrule man's use of freewill. .. compounding evil. These enemies will also be judged and punished according to their deeds None of this shows that the being I described can logically exist. "As a "preemptive rebuttal"… to prove that overruling freewill would indeed be a greater good, my opponent would have to prove that wiping humans of all brain function and utilizing them as cattle or devices is "good and loving" above whatever harm they may do. " Why cannot this all powerful god give humans the need to do good? He supposedly does not allow humans to breathe underwater or teleport at will even if we wished we could. This however in no way inhibits our free will. "If Hitler was killed by God as a baby by a "not so random disease" to avoid the tragedy of the Third Reich, God is called an unjust evil baby killer or powerless to cure Hitler. If Hitler is allowed to live…. God is called either powerless to stop Hitler's slaugher machine or He is evil to not stop Hitler's slaughter machine. " I made neither of these claims. "You can see the problem with my opponents claims is that neither He (nor I) are in a good position to know what God should do and when. " This is simply an appeal to ignorance.