The fine-tuning argument for the existence of God is sound

Since the debate has gone tiresome and repetitive, I will try to be as concise. By the way to clarify I didn't imply any ad hominem on Con, those words such as new-atheists and teenage are not meant to represent for him but as I mentioned I consider him to be mature and professional, unlike the usual fanatic new-atheists, so that's a compliment instead. I also didn't mean to express any superiority complex by respectfully asking him to concede with me. So let us avoid these misunderstandings & various allegations.Con again reiterate his arguments unfortunately, so I assume it is a sincere mistake on his part that he hasn't been able to understand where the fallacies lie in those objections. Let me try again elucidating.He asks me which of the two lives organic and spiritual, do I believe falls under intelligent life. I believe both are intelligent but the nature of soul is irrelevant to the fine tuning argument. Why it is irrelevant equivocation to ask about my beliefs about whether soul and minds are intelligent or not because we are dealing with the fine-tuning argument. That argument only concerns the organic material life.He correctly defined the nature of God as a "being" however he has made fallacy of association when arguing that God and spiritual life would require fine-tuned universe as well. He again alleged that my answer is a special pleading for non-organic lives, but that I refuted that misconception already. It would've been only special pleading case if I was pleading for a being in the same organic segment. He formulated the his question in another way:is human intelligence dependent on a physical fine-tuned universe or not, ie is it spiritually based? Also, if Pro believes there is a difference, what distinguishes physical/organic intelligence and spiritual intelligence? I feel the answers to these questions are pivotal to the rest of the debate.Is human intelligence depended on fine-tuned universe? Yes. The universe hast to be fine tuned for any intelligent life to exist. Is mind or soul's characteristics or intelligence depended on fine-tuned universe? No, because soul is beyond the realm of space and matter. It is more of a mind-body duality question than anything to do with fine-tuning. I'd request my opponent to be clearer and focus on the original aspects and premises of the topic of the debate. Other objections will be considered as red herring.Let me once again clarify what we mean by intelligent life. Note, the argument only deals with the organic physical special temporal kind of life. By "life" scientists mean that property of organisms to take in food, extract energy from it, grow, adapt to their environment, and reproduce. The point is that in order for the universe to permit life so-defined, whatever form organisms might take, the constants and quantities have to be incomprehensibly fine-tuned. In the absence of fine-tuning, not even matter or chemistry would exist, not to speak of planets where life might evolve. To give another analogy: All types of fruits in Mangoes are sweet. This does not allow us to conclude and relate same attribute of sweetness to fruits other than Mangoes such as lemon, just because they are "fruits". It is not a special pleading for non-sweet fruits but it is a fact. The irrelevant association is fallacious. Stalin was evil. Stalin was an atheist. Therefore atheists are evil because Stalin belonged to both groups. All creaturely (intelligent) life require fine-tuned universe. The soul is living and intelligent life. Therefore all souls require fine-tuned universe. All living men have beard. Microorganism is a life form Therefore microorganisms have beard. I hope this time Con understands where the fallacy lie. I am very sure that the reasoning is clear and simple to grasp. Let us hope he concedes with me now. He should also focus on the debate topic that is The fine-tuning argument for the existence of God is sound