Children should start learning education from the internet now, not schools.

As for this argument, you have flaws in your facts because I do not think you are reconsidering what you are saying. You said the internet is not developing more ways yo teach people, then could you please tell me what the internet is developing more of? Also, allow me to ask you, have you ever built an website before? You said websites do not magically appear with accurate information on them. And as i stated in my previous arguments it is up to you to gather the information from different sites and put them into one. You asked how the people who teaches you personally online get paid, you do know this is a simple answer but I guess you do not care to research about your own questions. They get paid like teachers do, but through the internet. It is a class in the internet taught by teachers, basically like schools but avoiding bullying, gun fires, and other dangerous possibilities. You asked if an illiterate child is supposed to do what through clicking, reading, and typing. But imagine the video teaching alphabets by a teacher writing them on a board, and there is a pencil and a paper in front of the child. The basic fundamentals of a human brain stimulates the brain to copy what the person in the video is writing. Then you might ask, how would kid learn how to write? Do you remember how you started writing for the first time? For sure it was by your parents. I notice nearly half of your argument states my grammatical mistake. That allows the reader to think that you are sentimental. You have shown your anger toward my arguments and attacks, basically you are losing from acting by thinking. You are acting by feeling. What I am talking about from this topic is that you do not need to actually visit/go to school, sit down and learn from the teacher in front of you. Learning from the internet is just like learning from school what don't you get? Why are you persistently stating how a child will be able to write or spell. Once again, it is just like having classes in Kindergarten, but by the internet. You say Youtube is a prime a distraction. Ask the people around if they think like that. Clearly you are putting sources that actually help us and say it is a distraction. Just how many things have people learned from Youtube. I forgot to mention that one of your facts are wrong. You said cyber bullying is now increasingly raising the suicide rate of students, but you are wrong. It is by bullying and the stress that the school gives. As a reminder please review your facts before stating them. It is funny you say that I persist on presenting nearly identical evidence each time, do you really not know why? It is because I have to state my facts over and over again by your same questions that I have already answered, I have to remind you again and again each argument. This again shows that you do not read and carefully of other people's ideas. As connection speeds increase and the ubiquity of the Internet pervades, digital content reigns. And in this era, free education has never been so accessible. The Web gives lifelong learners the tools to become autodidacts, eschewing exorbitant tuition and joining the ranks of other self-taught great thinkers in history such as Albert Einstein, Alexander Graham Bell, Paul Allen and Ernest Hemingway. "Learning is not a product of schooling but the lifelong attempt to acquire it." -Albert Einstein In April 2001, Charles M. Vest, the MIT President at the time, announced that the university would make its materials for all its courses freely available on the Internet. This initiative, found at OpenCourseWare, has enabled other teachers and lifelong learners around the world to listen and read what is being taught at MIT. 5 years later, in April 2006, UC Berkeley announced its plan to put complete academic courses on Apple"s iTunes U, beginning what is now one of the biggest collections of recorded classroom lectures in the world. One year later, in October 2007, the school launched UC Berkeley on YouTube. According to Benjamin Hubbard the Manager of Webcast at UC Berkeley, the school has had well over 120 million downloads since first sharing videos online, which they began doing in 2001. He says, "I think there"s a wide array of reasons why faculty should be engaged in recording and publishing lectures online. The first is wanting students to have access to materials. The second is for cultivating a really great affinity for a public university that"s providing research and community service. The third is closely aligned with this opportunity to provide educational resources all over the world to those from all walks of life, despite what disadvantages they have faced. It"s so important that we recognize as a public institution that this is something people value greatly and has great value for us too." Both Yale and Stanford have followed suit, and even Harvard has jumped on board in the last two years. Open Yale features free and open access to a selection of introductory courses taught by distinguished teachers and scholars, supported by funding from the William and Flora Hewlitt Foundation. Outside of the U.S., some of the most selective universities in India have created a vast body of online content in order to reach more of the country"s exploding student population. At Stanford, you can freely "attend" The Stanford Mini Med School featuring 3 year long series of courses by more than thirty distinguished faculty, scientists and physicians. The world"s encyclopedia is as weightless, free and instantly accessible as Wikipedia, which is quickly gaining legitimacy in the education sphere. Using the Internet, you can learn a new language or delve into the depths of metaphysics with just a click of a mouse. The Web has unlocked the keys to a worldwide virtual school, potentially leveling the playing field for students around the world. Excuse me, but please try learning from the internet for once in your life and then argue against this topic.