I am debating myself

Many thanks to AznWords for starting this. This looks to be really fun, I really had to think outside the box to refute this. So lets get to it. First, my opponent has violated his own rule. According to him, "Round 1 is for acceptance and definitions". But he gave definitions in round 2. Conduct goes con right there. Now to the debate, it would appear that in order for my opponent to win he must prove that he is debating himself. He has tried to do this by typing a supposed debate with himself about whether he can debate himself of not. First argument is Paradox. He claims he is debating himself. However, this supposed debate he is engaging in is about whether or not he can actually do so. This means that, in order to legitimately debate himself, he must be in question about whether he can actually do it. Therefore, since he is questioning himself about whether this resolution is even possible, he cannot prove the resolution true because he himself isn't sure that he can debate himself. This makes the resolution unverifiable. Second argument is Provability. As humans have not yet developed the technology necessary to read minds, we really have no way to definently know that he is debating himself. And he as such has no way of proving this either. For example, I can easily claim that I am running around my neighborhood half naked wearing a thong. That doesn't make it true; I have no way of proving it. in the same respect, that means that this resolution isn't verifiable either. Now he may say that he was in fact debating himself in his round 2 post, when he typed a discussion about whether debating himself is possible. However we also have no way of knowing whether this is a legitimate self-discussion, or whether he is merely faking this discussion to try and prove a point. Third argument is Timeframe. The resolution states "I am debating myself". Because no timeframe is given as to when this supposed debate with himself is taking place, the resolution must be considered active until this debate is over. If at any point during this debate my opponent is not debating himself, he loses because the resolution was false. This is because the validity of a topic can change over time. For example, if I create a topic that says "It is April 7th", then a day passes, the resolution becomes false because it would be April 8th. In the same respect, this resolution can be proven false if it does not remain true. Therefore, vote con because my opponent will surely not be debating with himself for the entire duration of this round. At some point he will be typing a response to my arguments, in which case he is debating me and not himself. Or he could be sleeping, at which point he is not debating himself either. He also must be debating himself for the entire duration of this debate because he himself said that's what he will attempt to do. My opponent wrote that "I was discussing or arguing the same topic as this debate and will continue to debate with myself outside of DDO till the conclusion of my current debate with BlackVoid". At that point, extend my argument saying that its not possible for him to be debating himself for an indefinite period of time; at some point he will either be debating me, sleeping, etc, and the resolution will become false. For these reasons I urge a con vote.