Public Anti-Nudity Laws are jusitfied

Thanks to my opponent for his quick reply back. It is important to note that this debate is a cost-benefit analysis. It is my job to show that public nudity laws would cause more harm then good, while it is my opponent's job to show the opposite. So far, my opponent has not offered any counterarguments, or shown that my arguments are wrong. His arguments are based on the fallacy reasoning of "two wrongs make a right". In other words, he states since there are other objectionable material that exists, therefore public nudity should not be allowed also. This is just plain absurdity which shall be addressed later on. My opponent has conceded that public nudity laws are not covered under the right of freedom of speech. This is important to note, since one cannot claim that the right to public nudity is something sacred to be protected. The right of speech is sacred for a variety of reasons. If politicians could control speech, then politicians could ensure their place in office by limiting dissent. Ideas would be unable to spread. The status quo could not be challenged. Instead my opponent states that individuals have the right to free will. However, what does this mean? Can a person do what he or she wants, without thinking about how it effects others? Absolutely not. One cannot attack others, commit acts of rape, or steal property. In essence, public nudity does harm others. I would enjoy the right to walk down the street and not see a penis. In fact, If a majority of people do not favor public nudity laws, It likely means that people do not looking at penises. I would challenge you to go to America, whip out your penis, and see how many people look at you in disgust or scream. If a person, looks at you in disgust or screams, it is likely that person was harmed by your penis. My opponent states that there is offensive speech all around us. However, as I stated earlier, the right to freedom of speech is a particularly important right. I also showed that the freedom of speech can be limited if it causes particular harm. There are laws that disallow harassment, and stalking. I do not need to expose myself to media coverage or political commentary that I find offensive. I do not have to be around people who I find to be annoying. However, If a public nudity laws are allowed, I am bound to run into a penis. My opponent states that "offensive material is all around us", something we can find on the internet, and has been: "labeled as "shameful" and "disturbing" when in truth, what is there to be offended about?" However, just because there is offensive material around us, doesn't mean I have the right to be exposed to it. I can choose not to read a dirty magazine or look at pornography on the internet. But why force someone to be exposed to something he or she does not want to see? Rebuttals: 1) I stated that individuals have the right not to see others nude. My opponent then gives a list of things individuals have the right not to be exposed to. However, almost all of these instances are cases that can easily be avoided and are in fact illegal. Also, how does it make sense that we should be exposed to MORE harm? It's like stating that if I saw a puppy being kicked, then I too should kick the puppy. This is a classical case of two wrongs do not make a right. War -> I do not need to read about war. I also am not forced to join the military. I oppose forced conscription. Rape -> Illegal Violence-> Assault is also illegal Hate -> Harassment is illegal. One does not need to expose themselves to hateful comments a private group makes (example: Don't go on the KKK website if your black) Second hand smoke -> Smoking inside restaurants and indoor facilities is illegal in the United States. If one see a cigarette, one can move out of the way to avoid the smoke. Smoke from outside will diffuse enough so that it would be harmless. Alcoholic Dads -> One can seek child custody if a father is abusive. Daytime TV -> Don't watch it. 2) "Nudity is allowed in private areas" So if things are offensive to the public, as long as we do them behind closed doors that is ok? Yes, exactly. Those that want to be exposed to the material can be. Those that do not want to be exposed to it, do not need to worry. Some people like penises. But should everyone be exposed to it? No. Also the law states that one cannot be nude in public, so the law isn't broken if it is done in a private area. How is that hard to follow? Nobody is harmed if I am naked when I am alone or with others who want to see me naked. In fact, it is impossible not to be clothed 24/7. How would one do the following activities: sex, change clothes, shower, remove waste. 3) Nudity is unsanitary I will reiterate, my opponent keeps on using the "two wrongs make a right fallacy". Many of these "unsanitary" areas are necessary. Developed nations live in a relatively clean atmosphere. It is unnecessary to live in a world covered in piss, cum, and crap. Not only that, but one must realize the inherit amount of bacteria and disease that exist in these forms in waste. Not to mention, that a naked butt, vagina, and penis creates additional holes for bacteria to enter. The list my opponent describes doesn't even top the list. Many people do not use public restroom since they find it unsanitary. However even still, waste is disposed in a sanitary way. Even if one uses a public toilet, one's butt is not directly on the seat. Instead when one sits, there is a hole to rest one's butt. This is completely different from sitting on a seat where one's naked rear end has also sat in. 4) accidental rapes can occur I do not know what the point of the list was. My opponent has not proved that my point is invalid. Also. Rocky 6 was made, and it was awesome. Most critics believe it is the second best in the series, with the best being the original of course. http://www.youtube.com... To reiterate, the harms of public nudity outweigh the benefit. If one wants the "right" to be naked, he or she can do it in private areas. But one should not do it in public areas where one does not want to be seen naked, can produce unsanitary waste, and accidental rape someone. I await my opponent's response.