God exists.

1) You're welcome. Since my opponent has made no contestation to my proposed definition of supernatural, then it must follow that he agrees God must not be visible and observable. Following that line of thought, then it is clear that this debate does not demand production of PHYSICAL EVIDENCE to God's existence (else God can't be a supernatural being) but rather MANIFESTATIONS of God as a conception fitting the proposed attributes. 2) My opponent has mistaken my wording. I meant exactly what he is referring to. The word "conceived" does not refer to the creation of God but merely indicates the attributes associated with it. Following my opponent's definition, God is also a supernatural being without "visible" and "observable" traits. In another word, God, or the concept of God, must possess the following attributes: a. perfect and omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe b. an object of worship in monotheistic religion c. existence beyond visible observable universe Since God's existence lies beyond the visible observable universe, then the focus must lies in the existence of the concept of God fitting all aforementioned attributes. 3. Many things that are beyond the visible observable universe exists among us. Love, loyalty, friendship, to name a few. In many cultures, each of these concepts takes form in supernatural being (or Roman gods/goddesses/fairies/spirits) throughout history. While visible observable trail of their physical being should not and must not directly observed due to their supernatural attribute, the manifestation and effect of their existence can be readily observed in our daily lives. 4. The actuality that Santa Claus exists to his follower is certain. Since all supernatural beings must remain beyond visible observable universe, it is rather silly to demand "physical" trail of these beings. Rather then physical actuality, both Santa Claus and God are very real within the conceptual actuality of their respective proponents. 5. In no part of my opponent's proposed definition must God follow my opponent's proposed framework of logic. In the aforementioned attributes, satisfaction to 2a is highly subjective to the individual believer and is satisfied as long as that individual finds God, or the concept of God, satisfying the criteria of 2a. 2b is clearly observable as a manifestation of God's existence. 2c is satisfied since neither my opponent nor I can find physical evidence to negate the supernatural nature of God. For as long as these three criteria are satisfied, God's existence requires no evil-slaying or love-seeking evidence put forth by my opponent. My opponent can question evil's existence as a function to God's work ethics, but such question does not negate God's existence. In conclusion, this is not a debate asking for physical evidence of God. Physical trail of his existence denies God's very own supernatural attribute and therefore being. Rather, the resolution seeks manifestation of God as a non-physical being let it be a spirit or an idea fitting the very definitions put forth by my opponent. Since my opponent already agrees that God, or the concept of God, exists as an idea among his followers, all judging criteria of this resolution have been satisfied and therefore the readers shall vote in favor of the pro.