Raepd women should be euthanized

Hello, Minnesotan. Welcome to this debate. You are missing the point by employing the fallacy of a straw man. While there are other types of rape, such as men or children getting raped with the aftereffect of PTDS, the point of this debate is focused on the category of raped women. Please make a necessary distinction and refrain from bringing up irrelevance. Your argument that women are needed for "continuing the future of the human race" shows that you regard women as instruments that are required just for making babies, as if they were factories of babies, a conception which implies that unraped women are not human beings. Strong woman-hating attitude and dehumanization of unraped women is implied in this proposition of yours. Notice the "unraped women" as distinguished from "raped women". The difference between the two will be clarified below in this argument when the features of raped women will be highlighted. "for every women you kill, you kill a child, and you kill his/her ancestors, therefore, you kill a entire lineage of people." - The last part of your argument. Killing a woman is killing a woman, not anybody else. Again, you fail to make a necessary distinction crucial to the analysis of an event, and instead you just conflate irrelevances into one mess of your rebuttal. Indeed it would be easy to imagine that raped women would likely refuse to be euthanized. However, their state of mind at the time of their expressing such dissent must be taken into account. Due to the traumatic effect raped women experience, their post-rape psychological state puts them in a position of being unable to make a conscious, rational choice. They are quite "out of their mind" and the opinions of such people are of no relevance; it is simply irrational to believe things told by someone whose consciousness is in a deplorable condition - just like we do not take what drunk people say seriously. The same principle applies to raped women. Hence, it is necessary for us to disregard when raped women express they do not wish to be euthanized since they simply do not know what they are saying. Another possible objection is that euthanasia is a form of murder - killing a human being. This is a vastly conservative notion that fails to comprehend the liberal idea of euthanasia at all. A debate on euthanasia will clarify this position. Besides all the psychological damages, rape has been frequently referred to as "a murder of a soul". What this means is that the soul of raped women has been killed upon them receiving rape, which means that raped women no longer hold a soul inside them. So here comes the essential question: Are raped women human beings after they lose their soul? The answer is rather simple and clear: No. A genuine and proper human is considered to hold both a physical form and a spiritual form. One is not a human being without a soul; it is nothing but a semblance of a human being with inner emptiness. The lack of soul and rationality, both of which are crucial features that make up a human being, justifies the position that raped women do not belong to the category of any type of "humanity" whatsoever. Thus, raped women are not humans, and from this follows that human rights, which are only applicable to human beings, do not apply to raped women. So raped women are not humans, but yet they are still automatically active in a way. What are they then? The answer is that they belong to a category of a nonhuman animal. And it is not at all a serious matter to cull animals.