The Personal God Does Not Exist

"The link that my opponent gave was from a website that argued Akehnaten borrowed monotheism from the Jews. I don't see why he is using this source to make the statement that he is."See quote below." I looked up the dates of Moses and Akenhaten. What I read, which may be inaccurate was Moses was around 1200 BC and Akhenaten 1336 BC or thereabouts......the exact date of the Exodus is fairly controversial.....My opinion, based on all I know, is that the Exodus of the Jews from Egypt was between 1420 and 1400 BC."The exact date of Akhenaten is known and the Exodus has never been pinpointed that is why it is controversial. The author offered his opinion on when the Exodus happened to suit his wishes. Therefore we should accept the reliable date we know as a definite rather than be guessers."This would be an argument from ignorance...The Jews did practice monotheism, and it was always practiced from the beginning of mankind, as the Jews have recorded."I will concede that it is an argument from ignorance.But my opponent shortly after creates his own argument from ignorance by stating that Monotheism has always been practiced since the beginning of mankind.There is no evidence to stake such a claim."During Moses' existence, it was explained that no one could see the face of Yahweh and live. I argue that this is why He does not come down and assert His own existence- we would not be able to survive it.....This is why God sends angels and responds to people with direct visions."I addressed this in point #6. How can one understand one that is superior(God) when one is incapable of effectively understanding one's equals(humans) or even one's inferiors(non-human animals)?Even if angels are sent the Personal God is not acting himself. Angels being sent, only further affirms point #8 that god is impersonal and passive."If the Christian God exists, then it logically follows that miracles exist, as proclaimed by many passages in the Sciptures....3 out of 4 doctors believe in miracles"This is not true, see point #4.Humans are not rational creatures and are often dismissive of things they are incapable of understanding.For example, it is common for humans to appropriate the term "genius" to someone who understands concepts which they fail to understand.Human beings will call someone an "idiot" for engaging in a certain behavior they consider incompetent.The appropriation of these terms by any means does not suggest understanding at all.I would say the act of appropriating these terms is the furthest thing from understanding since it is dismissive."Miracles" is another dismissal for such things that human beings are incapable of understanding.So how can one reason what one does not understand or is incapable of understanding?The alleged "Miracles" that human beings claim is nothing short of tawdry behavior on the part of human beings.It does not confirm the existence of a Christian God.It only shows that human beings constantly try to save face to cover their ignorance with such terms."If Jesus was resurrected the personal God Yahweh exists."No, if Jesus was resurrected it only affirms the existence of a god. The evidence Con presented has not shown whether god is personal. He only brought up the existence of Jesus of Nazareth's alleged resurrection. But Jesus was the alleged son of god according to Christianity, was he not? This only affirms more that god must be passive or impersonal as I pointed out in Point #8 since he has acted through a third party again.Note:My opponent has disregarded the debate structure even though he accepted this debate. I am referring to how in Round 2 he offered rebuttals rwhen he supposed to be presenting only an opening argument. This should result in the loss of his conduct points.