Evolution is Real

First, I would like to define evolution. Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. These characteristics are the expressions of genes that are passed on from parent to offspring during reproduction. This doesn't mean that we are debating macro-evolution, We are debating evolution itself. The point of this argument isn't to debate if we all evolved from one organism, It's to decide if organisms evolve. Fossil Record: You say that we didn't find many fossils of an organism transitioning between a dog and a horse. But there are. (https://upload. Wikimedia. Org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dd/Horseevolution. Png/800px-Horseevolution. Png) shows the organisms between a horse and a dog. There is plenty of evidence of transitional species, In other species too. The fact that scientists didn't find a lot of transitional fossils for one specific example (which they actually did) doesn't refute evolution. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Structural Homology: This is the most stupid argument against evolution I've ever heard. "Evolution doesn't exist because cats and horses don't have similar DNA" Of course they don't have similar DNA, They are different species! Similar legs is only a small part of DNA and wouldn't reflect much. Cats are much smaller and are almost completely different from horses, Their DNA shouldn't be similar! But guess what, The DNA of many more similar species (like humans and apes) is similar. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, While chimpanzees, Gorillas, And orangutans have 24. The fact that two very different species don't have similar DNA doesn't refute the theory of evolution. And oh yes, Brilliant Michael Denton, Who is considered by the scientific community to be an idiot. Mutualism: The stupidity is never-ending. Ummm. . . It IS possible for life to appear from dead matter, But that's beside the point. No, This instinct would not have to develop at the same time as the sweetlips fish got its teeth. It could appear later. And yes, The blue steak wrasse would have to independently decide to enter the other fish's mouth. None of this disproves evolution in any way! Now that I've dismantled your arguments, Let's get to mine. God doesn't exist. Gods don't exist. There is absolutely no evidence of an omnipotent deity existing somewhere up there in the sky or whereever. If you think that God exists, You would have to accept the fact that he created all species at the same time, Which he did not as humans didn't exist 50 million years ago but other species did. Now, You've made this argument into Evolution vs God. Who do you think is more likely to be true? Millions of scientists, Fossil records, DNA evidence, Or some holy book and priests? I'll let you answer that question. Nobody 'believes' evolution to be true. You've said that it's either God or evolution, So I choose evolution as it seems more logical. We observe and see which theory makes more sense, Unlike theists who blindly believe. Evolution is a scientific fact. Trying to refute it is just arguing semantics, Pointing out tiny inconsistincies, Ignoring the bigger picture, Ignoring millions of scientists, Ignoring fossils, And ignoring pretty much everything else.