The bible-written by schizophrenics- not the man himself.

Once again, my opponent has forfeited. But, the show must go on: I will continue with my defense that God created the scripture, though the evidence I have is more of logic and doctrine. Contention I: God is capable of human works. It is wrong to assume that God, because he is “an uncreated, omnipotent, and eternal being, [and] the creator and sustainer of all things” [1], that he is incapable of creating human works. I have already addressed with my syllogism, regarding the omnipotent attribute in my last argument. Now, I will discuss the doctrine of trinity as best as I can to promote my contention…The doctrine of trinity states that God operates through an assemblage of three divine figures: God the father, God the son [Jesus of Nazareth], and the Holy Spirit [the dove that inspires piety] [2] Jesus, a carpenter born of Joseph and Mary, was the supposed incarnate of God on earth. [3] My main argument in this round is that Jesus is, in spite of his divine status, arguably partly human. Like all humans, Jesus dies. Evidence for this is given when it is stated, in the Gospels, when he “gave up the ghost” after being crucified on the third hour [4]. (Note for possibly counterarguments: Remember, Jesus’ ascension to the heavens is separated from his death. It serves, in the context of this debate, as proof of his divine nature.) Another human characteristic might be “emotional capacity”, which Jesus fulfills as the Messiah. One may argue that Jesus can be characterized as fearful when he cries, “My god, my god, why have you forsaken me?” after the high priests have hung him, on the crucifix, as the king of the Jews. [4] He is apparently calm when he responds, “I am. You will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of the sky.” [5] He speaks human speech, as evident in his communication, and displays the aforementioned emotions. He is apparently reserved when speaking of his own death, to his servants and disciples, and is also understanding and wise, considering his Sermon on the Mount. “Wisdom” is the “knowledge of what is true or right coupled with just judgment as to action” [6] One may argue when Jesus instructs his disciples to ignore certain laws and customs, such as vowing oaths under the name of God, as a sign of what should be right…In addition, it should be known that I stated “partly human” to describe Jesus. I hope that I have demonstrated here that, to a certain extent, Jesus is human.* I will introduce a second syllogism: Major premise: God can manifest as a human [incarnate]. Minor premise: A human can create a “human” work. Therefore, god can create a “human” work. If we were to consider the limitless abilities and functions of the Godhead, then it should be safe to conclude that God can perform even a task such as writing a text or passage. For example, I will introduce a third, and less clear, logical example: presume God is set ?. Set ? contains all the letters of the alphabet [all actions/deeds, used to demonstrate his omnipotence.] One of those letters is X.5, the act of writing human works, and X.5 (1), specifically writing the scripture of Christianity itself. If Set ? contains X.5(1), then it is a part of its function. It is the same as another, even weaker analogy, a man who can do anything in gardening. Planting seeds in the soil is a part of gardening. Therefore, the man can plant seeds in the soil. Understand that the concept of God is limitless and rather hard to define in words. That is why I have chosen to at least use these analogies to support my argument. [1] www.wikipedia.com; God in Christianity [2] www.wikipedia.com; Trinity [3] www.urantia.com; The Biography of Jesus-Paper 122: Birth and Infancy of Jesus [4] Gospel of Mark; 15:33 [5] Gospel of Mark; 14: 62 [6] www.dictionary.com; definition of wisdomI would like to point out that PRO has already lost the debate. In the first round, he specifically stated "forfeits=loss". And he has forfeited two of his rounds, and may likely forfeit his other ones as well. Sadly, this seems a waste of time for me, because I am still interested in showing that there is some possibility that "the man himself" wrote hte bible. I am waiting for PRO's response. If he does not come back, I will then try to refute his resolution and prove that "schizophrenics" are less capable of writing the bible...Interesting, but flawed resolution, PRO.