Christianity is inconsistent.

In my opening, made two arguments showing that Christianity is inconsistent. The first argument was that the truth of Christianity entails the truth of Judaism prior to Christianity, and the truth of Judaism prior to Christianity entails the falsity of Christianity. So, Christianity is a self-refuting religion since it contains doctrines that, if true, would undermine itself. In response to this argument, Con said that the advent of Christianity made Judaism false. Con's response is not specific enough, though. If he means to say that Christianity diverged from Judaism at that point, and that Christianity was the true religion and Judaism subsequent to that division is false, then his observation is irrelevant. Notice that my argument didn't say anything about whether or not Judaism remained true after Christianity. It is only concerned with the truth of Judaism prior to Christianity. However, if Con meant to say that Judaism prior to Christianity also became false as a result of the advent of Christianity, then he has done nothing but introduce yet another inconsistency in Christianity. As I showed in the last round, Christianity entails that Judaism prior to Christianity was true, but if Con wants to say that Judaism prior to Christianity was false, then that is inconsistent. The second argument I gave was that the Christian Bible both affirms and denies a resurrection, which is inconsistent. Con's response appears to be that the no resurrection passages are meant to be taken as no resurrection on earth, whereas the pro resurrection passages are meant to be taken as pro resurrection in heaven. If that were the case, then it would resolve the apparent contradiction. But unfortunately for Con, he is mistaken to say that resurrection takes place in heaven. If you will look again at the passages I cited in the previous round, you will see that the resurrection takes place on earth. In Daniel 12:2, the subject of the resurrection is those who sleep in the dust of the ground. That is what awakes in the resurrection. So a resurrection entails a physical body coming back to life and leaving its earthly grave. Likewise, we see in John 5:28 that at the voice of Jesus, those who are dead in their tombs will come forth from their tombs, risen from the dead. We see also in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-16 that Jesus descends from heaven, i.e. he returns to earth. Then it says the dead in Christ will rise first. So it only after Jesus returns to earth that the resurrection occurs. It follows that the resurrection occurs on earth. Again, many sources could be cited showing that the resurrection is an earthly event that entails physically dead people coming back to life and leaving their graves empty. That is exactly what happened to Jesus. When he rose from the dead, his tomb was empty, and the reason is because his resurrection entailed his physical body coming to life and leaving the tomb. Jesus' resurrection is the model for our resurrections, so if his resurrection entailed his dead body coming back to life and leaving its earthly grave, then so does ours. There you have it. I have successfully defended both of my arguments against Con's attempt at rebuttal.