Human Beings Evolved

Okay, let's get started. .. You say I'm acknowledging that evolution exists. That's wrong i didn't say that. Just because i said we had primate ancestors doesn't mean i acknowledge evolution. It just means i acknowledge some of our history. Doesn't mean i agree with evolution. It still an unproven theory. Their are just as many scientists who don't believe in human evolution. Example of one scientists, Dr Julia Shaw. "Well, let me tell you a secret about science; scientists don"t prove anything. What we do is collect evidence that supports or does not support our predictions. Sometimes we do things over and over again, in meaningfully different ways, and we get the same results, and then we call these findings facts. And, when we have lots and lots of replications and variations that all say the same thing, then we talk about theories or laws. Like evolution. Or gravity. But at no point have we proved anything". (5. ) . https://blogs.scientificamerican.com... This isn't just one scientist who believe this there are many others. "Evolutionary theory cannot account for life"s complexity by pointing to real gaps in scientific knowledge, which indisputably exist in all scientific theories, but also by misrepresenting well established scientific propositions". (6. ). https://en.m.wikisource.org... Pro say this "There's not one thing in Genesis that can be scientifically validated or shown to be correct". Believing in creations don't need to have a scientific reasons on being right. You just have to have a understanding of how to believe in the supernatural. Pro also say this "So again, the argument that the second law of evolution isn't compatible with thermodynamics simply doesn't work-it is clutching at straws". Well you did put a nice touch on this. But i think you are failing to understand the simple concept of thermodynamics laws. Creation is set, cannot be added to nor subtracted from. kinda like a Legos set, you have so many pieces and they can only be moved, deconstructed and reconstructed. Creation moves only in progression but never increases. .. never decreases, once the Creator sets it in motion though it cannot be added to only rearranged. Consciousness, is never changing, never dies or was born. The Creator exists basically in a fixed state, and isolated system. .. .it was not born nor decreases and nothing can be added to it. That is the state of the Creator, the pure conscious alone state. The only way for the Creator to experience change or something other than the alone state is through creation, which is the manipulation of consciousness, movement, energy and of course matter, atoms, molecules ect ect. .. .but consciousness, is an isolated system from which all arrangement come from. "The micro-level, a system's entropy is a property that depends on the number of ways that energy can be distributed among the particles in the system. Entropy is a measure of probability, because if energy can be distributed in more ways in a certain state, that state is more probable". (10. ) . http://www.asa3.org... Pro say "They have researched where we came from; originally, it was Africa". Yes in science they have. But not in the bible. .. Did you know Evolution is basically a religious philosophy. "Evolution is a belief system about the past based on the words of men who were not there, but who are trying to explain how all the evidence of the present (that is, fossils, animals, and plants, etc. ) originated". (7. ) . https://answersingenesis.org... The other part of this demonstrate that evolution is not science but religion. "Science, of course, involves observation, using one or more of our five senses (taste, sight, smell, hearing, touch) to gain knowledge about the world, and to be able to repeat the observations. Naturally, one can only observe what exists in the present. It is an easy task to understand that no scientist was present over the suggested millions of years to witness the supposed evolutionary progression of life from the simple to the complex". (8. ) . https://answersingenesis.org... Did you know, they were no living scientist was there to observe the first life forming in some primeval sea. Anther fact is there was "no living scientist there to observe the big bang that is supposed to have occurred 10 or 20 billion years ago, nor the supposed formation of the earth 4.5 billion years ago (or even 10,000 years ago! )". (9. ) . https://answersingenesis.org... Human Evolution is at best a good theory. .. But you would think will all the evidence human evolution has it would be accepted everywhere. But it just not. Even after 150 years of studying it, it no closer to be universally accepted by everyone. It just a good theory. There is a reason why human evolution not accepted to even some of their own scientists. Really this could go on and on. But it was only for 3 rounds. .. ..