A creator/creators probably exists

In the same spirit I will attempt to put forward an unbias and logical case. I agree to point 2 and 3 but due to the seriousness of this debate I believe God needs to be defined clearly. We can decide on a mutually agreed defenition of God during the debate and continue the debate at the same time as rounds are limited. If that is agreeable to Con. God: Firstly sentient implies existance. Any action proven to be purposeful implies a sentient cause. Any action proven to be random implies non-sentience. I contend that God is beyond human comprehension. As proof I offer the example of any creature lower than humans on the evolutionary scale. It is impossible for any creature to comprehend the complexities of being human. Thay can only do so in terms they comprehend. Namely shelter, food, reproduction. Because we are at the top of the evolution scale we believe we know and understand everything. For a species that is discovering new ideas and possibilities daily I believe its foolish to believe we can comprehend God. Therefore defining aspects to God from our perspective is a foolhardy exercise as we can easily disprove those aspects. For this reason I suggest we define God as the creator of everything and nothing else. Purpose versus random event. I contend that any object is iether create on purpose or by random events. The probability of its existance being purposed is higher than its probability of its existance being a random event. Proof: let us take the simplest object I can imagine. A wooden stick with one end hardened in a fire. Such an object could be created by a person or by nature due to random events. A man takes a branch and trims off the twigs then sharpens one end and holds it in the fire. This seems concievable. Lightning strikes a branch resulting in a fire. The branch falls to the ground where it lands in a puddle and the fire is put out. Some animals walk past and tramp on the branch at just the right angle to break off any twigs. Also concievable. But if you find such a stick lying in the forest the probabilty that it is man made is much higher than the probability that it is a result of random events. More complicated objects increase the probability that the object was purposed and decrease the probability that they exist due to random events. I believe this proves that an object that was created on purpose is more probable than the same object created by random events. Now a creator: I contend that proof of such a being existing does not exist. Niether is there proof the being doesn't. All personal feelings aside the answer is either yes or no. Logic can not dictate this answer as our logic is limited to our understanding. We can never understand god unless we are his equal. Therefore the logic which determines our belief in God's existance is incomplete. A guess is the only possible option. But we can make an educated guess by what we know as fact. So what do we know as fact? We know that the universe exists. We know that life exists. We know that life is more likely to exist on purpose than by random events. Logically the best guess is God exists and we are purposed. I now hand you over to Con.