Total Control (pro) is Better Than Free Will (con)

Here we go... this debate is under society. Opening: In this debate, I establish that the definition of complete control is a world that everyone knows the difference between right and wrong and are controlled to do the right thing. Principles of Personal Ethics include: Concern for the well-being of others Respect for the autonomy of others Trustworthiness & honesty Willing compliance with the law (with the exception of civil disobedience) Basic justice; being fair Refusing to take unfair advantage Benevolence: doing good Preventing harm http://www.ethics.ubc.ca... This is my establishment of right. We would only be controlled to follow these Principles. I know that my second rule says respect for the autonomy of others, but this rule is with compliance of all the other principles. Since 1997, the following framework of principles has been used by six instructors to facilitate learning and spark dialogue with a wide variety of students, business people and professionals in Africa, China, Czechoslovakia and across North America. In each case, participants were encouraged to suggest changes, additions or deletions. Only one minor change has ever been suggested. 1). Bastardizing Free Will: Anarchy The definition of anarchy is without rule.- Encarta Dictionary The antonym of anarchy is without order.- Encarta Dictionary Order: 4. absence of crime, a peaceful condition in which laws are obeyed and misbehavior or crime is not present or is prevented. Encarta Dictionary These definitions of anarchy are from a world that is run off free will. As I established in the beginning, the definition of the perfect world is one that is run off of those universal principles that were mentioned. In a world of free will, without someone steering the wheel of the car, the car is not in control. Free will for one person can prove to be detrimental to someone else. "It is all fun and games until someone gets hurt." Total control under the universal principles mentioned would drive the car and the car would be humans. With free will, anarchy is not logically possible. 2). Bastardizing Free Will: Exercising Free Will Should life be such an ultimate test to do what is right instead of wrong? It is hard to simply comprehend the choices between right and wrong. For both are merely ambiguous to the average human. Universal right and wrong is determined by principles. Hurting people while exercising one’s free will should never be justified as right. 3). There is good in everyone: The truth is that there is good in everyone. It is hard to do the right thing all of the time… Not be selfish, not to lie, not to steal, or kill, what if a force drove us to do the right thing all of the time. This will happen; the average person does not need to know the absolute difference between right and wrong when a force would drive us. Man, without this force driving us feels like we need to know the difference between right and wrong. 4). Marxist Communism under the universal principles listed: Communism is a sociopolitical movement that aims for a classless and stateless society structured upon common ownership of the means of production, free access to articles of consumption, the end of wage labour and private property in the means of production and real estate. In Marxist theory, communism is a specific stage of historical development that inevitably emerges from the development of the productive forces that leads to a superabundance of material wealth, allowing for distribution based on need and social relations based on freely-associated individuals. http://en.wikipedia.org... With humans living according to the principles, this society would work. The ideal world where one does not worry about money, the World has plenty to share, with total control according to the principles mentioned, this is possible. With controlled will according to the principles listed, anarchy is logically possible. Marxist communism is anarchy. 5). Marxist Communism is not a model of modern China and Soviet Russia communism: China and Soviet Russia’s communist models are not based on Marxist Communism. Read parts of: http://www.megaessays.com......