Morsi Should Not Have Been Removed From Power by the Military

1) Legality of impeaching"there were no channels for removing him via other means he is blatantly wrong. All of his points saying that the only way to remove Moris was via military coup are therefore false."If you would maybe like to provide evidence showing that the Egyptian Constitution does establish a process for impeaching presidents then that would help, because just claiming that they can impeach them when there is no evidence suggesting that anyone has that type of power is simply lyingYou can look at the actual text of the Egyptian Constitution though there is nothing in there about impeachment. See for yourself: http://www.egyptindependent.com...2) Turmoil"Great, I didn't say life in Egypt was fine and dandy before the coup."You were certainly trying to imply that...."Supporting Morsi and being part of his government has gotten dozens of people killed or imprisoned simply for supporting someone politically"The military isnt condoning that though, the instances where the military has killed Morsi supporters all were scenarios where the supporters may have attacked the military first. There are dozens of pro-morsi demonstrations happening all over Egypt at any given time and the military is respecting their right to protest and are simply keeping things in order. http://www.worldbulletin.net..."At what point does the military step down and reattach the leash it is supposed to have be held by the executive and give up that power?"When they have a president who doesnt try to use the power of the presidency to make himself immune from the courts would be a good start.....3) The Alternative"He counters my factual argument of my saying that the government would have remained in place by saying that there might not have been reform" Might? Its a FACT that there wouldnt be any reform should Morsi have stayed in power because he was only pandering to his base supporters (Muslim Brotherhood) as I have previously shown through sources. He was disregarding reforms long before he was overthrown, and had he stayed in power theres no reason to assume he would have changed his ways. "Morsi was a bad president yes, but he should not have been removed from office, especially if the argument for doing so is based off such massive amounts of pure speculation."Its not pure speculation though, its a fact that he abused his powers, a fact that he wasnt pursuing reforms, a fact that he was pandering to his own base, and a fact that there arent legal ways to impeach him. 4) Conclusion"Abuse of power should have been dealt with internally."By who, the courts? He made it so that they literally couldnt question anything he did, there wasnt an internal path to counter Morsi's abuse of power. "There were internal judicial and constitutional means of removing Morsi."Im still waiting to see where it says that the Courts had the power to do such a thing"Removing Morsi from power is one thing but the military suspended the entire government for a military run government which is damaging and wrong."I agree, but we're not debating whether or not they should have suspended the WHOLE government, just whether or not they should have kicked out Morsi"Again, there were other ways of removing Morsi rather than a full military take over."Still waiting to see where it says that in their Constitution.....