In a world without negative emotions, there will be no positive emotions

I have to admit I had never thought from your angle before and I hope I don't end up contradicting myself. I think I can persuade the readers to my view but if not then perhaps you will have persuaded me. So lets get started. SUMMARRY OF CON'S ARGUMENT: He's stating that because of the degrees of happiness the "lower" happiness would become normal and the "higher" happiness positive. In a world with negative emotions I can only see one of 2 situations that would cause this: a. Nothing bad ever happens. b. Humans can feel no negative emotions Well with choice "a" it is obvious illogical but because of the philosphical nature of this debate we must discuss it. In a world where nothing bad ever happens nothing good can ever happen. Bad things to one person can be good things to another. EXAMPLE: (going with my opponents example) A man win's $1,000,000 dollars. That's great for him but what about all the other lotto players and the owners of the lotto themselves. The owners lose money and the people who didn't win, well quite simply, don't win. The majority of people aren't happy with losing and the majority of people aren't happy when they lose money. They're actually unhappy. Choice "b" is also illogical but that doesn't matter due to the fact that we're discussing an impossible premise, which means it can exist in an impossible world. Humans can feel no negative emotions I believe means they can't feel any emotions. If they can't feel any emotions they can't feel positive emotions. Let us say for discussion's sake that they can feel only what we would describe as positive emotions. Well this is impossible by human nature as because if people start at a certain level not everyone will be at the "lower" level normally. They will rise to a mid level because some people with have better luck, better attitude, easier going, etc. and rise in happiness. This means that the emotions below that "level" will become negative emotions and since this debate is over whether or not in a world WITHOUT negative emotions there will be no positive emotions this argument is null. It's null because this world would develop negative emotions of its own, just not as negative as the ones we have in our world. CONCLUSION: The world can't have everybody being happy all the time. While in this proposed world of my opponents the "bar" of happiness would be raised it would just raise above other sections of happiness making them negative as the definition of a negative emotion is something that makes you feel worse than normal. By my opponents defintion he is assuming that everyone in our world starts out in a bad mood. It's precisely because of his degrees of positive emotions that his world can't work. People will raise the bar of "happiness" thus leading lower parts of "happiness" to become negative emotions. The only way a world can have no negative emotions (or positive emotions really) is for their to be no emotions at all. Having only one type of emotion contradicts having a positive or negative one. EXAMPLE: With electricity there are positive and negative charges. Without one the other can't work. In a world without negative charges their would be no charges period because positive charges can't work without negative charges. Without the negative charges the positive charges wouldn't have any "charge" thus deleting charges altogether. Switch in "emotion" for "charge" and you have the exact summary of my argument.