we should have courage and reasons to have courage

Is Hitler courageous because he stood up for what he believed in and also backed it up with action? Hitler also cared a great deal for his cause. Hitler also had many loyal followers who found him trustworthy and he gained them through various speeches and campaigns. All this you can't deny. I assume you will you will say he didn't respect other people. He respected only certain people because a majority of German people feared Communism so Hitler set out to destroy it. Many Germans felt WWI was unfair so Hitler set out to take the land back. People wanted jobs, he gave it to them by constructing factories. Politics does involve respect form the voters and requires the politician to seem as though they respect the general population. Can one have courage without fear? Let us look at this through various scenarios. First scenario: If one man who is fighting in some war is hoped up on pcp and feels invincible. In his drug induced mind he believes he can't die he thinks the bullets will just bounce off him. So he gets out from cover and charges towards enemy (which is overwhelmingly large) only to get shot and killed. This man has no fear but is he demonstrating courage? No he is not he is demonstrating foolhardiness. The prime minister who my opponent mentioned also demonstrated foolhardiness and destroyed his country in the name of a cause. This is because both didn't think about the consequences of their actions and ignored what they should have feared. In the prime ministers case he may have been poorly equipped, which would have increased the chance of failure and negative consequences. Courage is when one is aware of these consequences and is aware that they should fear them. However they feel given what they have to offer could make a difference to the outcome under these conditions. Since there is a risk there should be fear and since they feel they can make a difference they take a chance despite their fear. Therefore fear is important component to courage. Respect is a good human trait but it is not necessary for courage. Scenario: A person is on top of a 100 foot tall burning building and there is a building next to them about the same high that is about 5m away. The person is in a situation in which they should and rightfully so fear the fire. They also are in a situation in which they should and rightfully should have the fear of falling if they take the jump. However given the current physical ability they are in decent shape and feel they could make the jump and choose not to try and get through the fire (they make the jump and survive). Would it have made since for someone who is morbidly obese to try and make the jump or would they more likely survive the fire? None the less the person is demonstrating courage because they choose to do the action that could produce the most benefit despite their fear. You may say they could have died either way and therefore they were forced to do a courageous act. However, that would be faulty because they could have choose not to choose and could have just let what happened happen this would have been the cowards choice. This Scenario also did not use the human trait trustworthiness, or citizenship. However, you could say it involved caring for one's own life but you could not say it is caring for others. Which leads us to the question can one not care and be courageous? I don't believe so because if you fear something you would obviously care about what the fear threats to fear it. Example If you care about a person you would to some degree fear bad things happening to them. If you care about freedom then you would fear things restricting it or destroying it. My opponent said "we must have all five traits to be courageous no matter what." However I have demonstrated how we do not need all five traits to be courageous.