This House Believes That A Virgin Birth Is Scientifically Possible, Even If Improbable!

I thank iamanatheistandthisiswhy for his response. I do apologize for the confusion, when I discussed the 1995 case it was a parthenogenesis birth, though upon further inspection I learn that it is half parthenogenesis. This and the Jesus case aside though, my argument was not based one bit on these examples. My opponent completely missed my analysis of science, and how my argument was based on the scientific analysis. As that scientific analysis was never tackled, I extend all contentions. You see showing my examples are wrong means nothing, because the motion reads that it is scientifically possible, and the procedure I pointed out earlier is naturally possible, even if extremely improbable. I myself admit that it is only one in a twelve billion chance. So while it may never have been recorded my medicine is sound. Secondly the case I mentioned is a parthenogenesis birth for the genetic material of the boy is all female. To quote the essay: 'According to a 1995 report in the journal Nature Genetics, a mother brought her infant boy to the doctor after noticing that his head was developing abnormally. When doctors analyzed his blood, they found something truly bizarre: Despite his anatomically male features, the boy's blood cells were entirely female, consisting only of genetic material from his mother. Some of his other cells"such as those found in his urine"were normal, consisting of a combination of both maternal and paternal DNA. No one knows exactly how this occurred, but the best guess is that immediately after being fertilized, one of his mother's eggs fused with a neighboring unfertilized egg that was dividing parthogenetically. This gave rise to a boy who was considered half-parthenogenetic, since approximately half of his cells were derived from a "faux" conception, containing no remnants of his father's DNA.' Now the only reason I showed this is because this shows that if a half parthenogenesis can occur, then a full one can too. In any case a faux fertilisation did occur, if the mother had not had sex and had a genetic disorder, or had taken a large amount of calcium this would have been a full parthenogenesis birth. Some vertebrates use parthenogenesis to produces diploid zygotes. In any case my defense of my example was unneeded because the real thing was the science, and that is provided in my original argument. That aside this paragraph shows that a faux fertilization can occue (the hard part), the only other thing needed is a rise in calcium something which can be done as easily as eating large amounts of Kale. Another way is to have parmesan everyday for four months before and during a faux fertilization. When the faux fertilization will occur, the body will take the extra calcium and insert it there. This will, as I have previously mentioned, allow miosis and will then create different tissue which will eventually grow a liver, heart et cetera. This tissue will start sucking energy and eventually will grow a heartbeat and will then become a proper child. As for Jesus I have shown that there is evidence that he could have been a parthenogenesis case.