The US should hire death squads to root out terrorists

I) Death Squads are repressiveHiring death squads to kill citizens off the streets is repressive, and in America, we live in a land where repression and democratic values are embodies. Killing people off the streets outside the law can be interpreted as repression, andys as we all know, tensed up will, is released will at one point of time. Or unnesecary bloodshed towards America. I am not disputing the benefits of killing terrorists, but the harm in doing it in this manner. There are better and more civil ways we can deal with terrorism. Even under these circumstances, we're still shooting random people on the guise they're terrorists. The US has made more false terror charges than people died of terrorism in total throughout the US. If we were to kill people based on every charge, we would be systematically murdering many innocent citizens, repressing the people. II) Death Squads lower our international standing It is a known fact, that other nations do not approve highly of having death squads systematically murder US citizens. Actually, the several countries with death squads have been cut off from most forms of arm sales and diplomatic negotiations. Eritrea, a state that used after curfew death squads, has completely fallen from the international community. A state of the US's side will be even worse. All are allies will turn against us for extrajudicial democide, and most likely penalize us in some way. Given the US has low terror rates compared to European countries, and there are more responcible ways to go about this, including more border security and reforms to the department of the interior. Hiring death squads is the least responcible answer. III) Death Squads will cause more terrorism The opposition claims that the use of death squads will end terrorism, therefore, a temporary measure. This is fallacious, and terrorism can't be ended in this manner. Mind you, millions of muslims and christian sects will take this as an attack on their community. Especialy those who are radical and watching their American chapter/cells dies. By hiring death squads for the systematic murder of Christian and Muslim terrorists, we are essentially paving the way for several exodus's, crusades, and jihads. Hell, the oppositions plan will make us the Jihad capital of the world. There is absolutely no evidence that killing terrorists will send a message. This is unsubstantiated and the oppositions BOP is eympty at this point.IV) Restatement on morallity of Death SquadsSimple. As I stated earlier, we accuse more terrorist charges than people who actually die from terrorism, and by a large margin. If we were to kill every suspected terrorists, then there would be about 100,000 dead and innocent Americans. Is it moral to kill more than terrorism takes? No, and that's even coming from an objective POV. Killing innocents is counter inituitive to the reason the opposition proposed instating them in the first place. The simple truth remains, that if even one person dies who is innocent, we betrayed our values and the original goal of having death squads.V) Illegal Simple. It is both nationally and internationally illegal to kill someone outside the court systems. This is known as Democide, and while repercussions for government democide are lhumorlessly low, they still exist. We can be stripped of all our inoming debt money, and isolated from the democratic world. Envision the US getting kicked out of 25 organizations like Russia jud did. We need to stay in these organizations, and many are designed to fight terrorism. The trade offs are nothing to 100 at this point, and it's sad that stronger arguments were not brought forward by the opposition.VI) Reinstatement of more responcible methods to combat terrorism- Increasing security reforms- Expanding budgets for Homeland Security and DOI- Stop fvcking with Muslim nations- Increase the budget for our struggling police force- Stop treating some groups like second class citiens. VII) Conclusion There are a million things wrong with Pro's arguments. He didn't correlate death squads with any actual data. He completely ommitted collateral damage, and was short sighted in the fact that many repercussions were overlooked.I highly doubt Pro will fullfill the BOP at this point, with so many flaws in his system. Especially since their are more tried and true systems out there at the moment. In short, not only is Pro's BOP eympty, but it outright negated through anti contentions. http://www.theguardian.com...https://www.wm.edu...http://www.dhs.gov...http://www.nbcnews.com...