Trinity is not logical and biblical

The title of this debate is "Trinity is not logical and Biblical", after reviewing my opponents previous debates, I have not seen (at least to my satisfaction) his/her arguments had refuted that the Trinity is not logical or Biblical. With that being said, I will be arguing that the Trinity is logical and Biblical by not only presenting Biblical evidence that supports the Trinity but also scientific evidence that the concept of the Trinity is interwoven in the fabrics of our everyday lives. First, let me present some basic scriptures that support the Trinity is Biblical, for the sake of understanding the concept Trinity comes from the root (Tri) meaning three and (unity) meaning one, I will also be using the King James Bible Translation for all Biblical verses. 1 John 5:7King James Version (KJV) 7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. We can clearly see that 1 John 5:7 clearly teaches that the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost bear record in heaven, and these three are one. We even have scriptural evidence that the Trinity was written as a prophecy before Jesus Christ was born through the loins of the Virgin Mary in the book of Isaiah 9:6, Isaiah 9:6King James Version (KJV) 6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Isaiah 9:6 states "For unto us a child is born", unto us a son is given (foretelling the birth of Jesus Christ), and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Indicating that this child that was born, this son that was given is the mighty God, The everlasting Father, and the Prince of Peace. Now let us consider a conversation that Jesus himself had with a disciple named Philip, John 14:9-11King James Version (KJV) 9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father? 10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. 11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake. Jesus himself told Philip he that hath seen me hath seen the Father denoting the oneness of the Father and the Son because Philip was looking at it from a natural perspective that in his mind he kept hearing Jesus talk about the Father but didn't observe the Father anywhere in there company. But Jesus clarified to Philip he that hate seen me hath seen the Father once again denoting the oneness of the Father and the Son. Let us also not forget John 10:30, John 10:30King James Version (KJV) 30 I and my Father are one. I could take my opening statement and rebuttal in many directions and I have seen my opponent's three logical questions that I reserve the right to answer in the upcoming rounds of this debate, I will also show examples of the Trinity scientifically. I look forward to reading my opponent's response to these scriptures that support the scriptural teachings of the Trinity in which he/she must tear down each verse and in its place present rebuttals and arguments that show the Trinity is not logical and Biblical. Once again, I thank my opponent for this debate and I look forward to his/her argument. Source: . https://www.biblegateway.com...