There is no hell

This is not the end of the Debate. Con has failed to prove that souls can make a choice. How can they possibly make a choice if they are God's creation unless it was the Devil who got into them and surely that was not their choice. Point 1. I never suggested that arguing that God exists is the resolution. And of course your debating to show that God exists was pointless from an arguing point, however it just shows that we have proof. You also stated before you wrote this evidence of God, that it does not effect the debate which was completely correct from arguing point of view. Also, a loving God does prove that there is not a Hell. Example: I shall take this in steps. Step one: God creates the world and humans in it. Step two: The humans think like he wanted them to think with love and kindness Step three: The Opposite to God took over and made humans corrupt. Step four: (only for Christians to believe) Jesus Christ helped the humans and because of him, they are doing more good (step four is not relevant to the debate necessarily, however the other steps are) Conclusion: If we are creations of God, we would not choose against kindness and the rest of his teachings, unless the Devil got into us but if it did, how is that our choice. Therefore there is no Hell that God sends us to. Con has failed to prove against that. So this leaves us to say, if we are only creation then we cannot choose against God unless the Devil got into us but that is not choosing ourselves. So how can Justice be justified in this situation ? And let us say that some Muslim terrorists today, are probably killing many, whilst thinking that they are punishing (doing justice on) those who do not accept them, the amount of suffering is terrible and you are suggesting that this is what loving creator would do to his creation ? Also, just to say that my point was just as relevant to the Debate when proving that God exists then you were. So Con has failed to prove that there is a neutral force the makes us able to choose, or that Hell can be justified or how possibly would a loving creator torture his own people. Point 2. From the points above, I have proved that it is not possible for there to be a Hell, if there was a Hell then how would it have a loving creator sending souls to it, to be tortured, you will have to prove that torture is a just thing to do because any kind of punishment = any kind of torture. Also torture is creating sadness (e. g. Mao, Stalin and Vlad the Impaler) and as far as we know, creating sadness is against God. Con has failed to prove any of these points wrong. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These are the reasons why not to vote Con: 1. Con has failed to prove that there is a neutral force that makes us able to choose against God 2. Con has failed to justify any torture 3. Con has failed to show how we are able to choose against God 4. Con has failed to show how if God exists, how has he given us a choice. Thank you and even though you may not be reading this: Have a nice day :). (Proof of the idea of the Devil taking over after God's perfect world: Source a) Bible Gateway: Genesis 2:4-3:24 Source b) Conversational Theology : Why is there so much evil in the world ? )