The Harry Potter book series is better than the Twilight book series.

Pro's Case1) Am I stating an opinion?What exactly is the authors purpose in killing good guys? Pro claims it makes it more realistic. I claim that it is to invoke an emotional response in the reader, to make a impact. Authors write fiction books to get readers to experience their imagination, to grab the readers interest. Playing with the readers emotions does just that, it captures the readers attention. Authors do not try to make fiction, which by definition is story about imagination, more realistic. Maybe if we were arguing over two biographies, then Con might have a valid case as to why the Author would want to make their story more realistic.Making an impact vs. Making a story realisticYou decide, which side accurately describes why a an Author writes a fiction book? The next two points brought up areA) Twilight is about two love-struck teenagers. Absoultely not. Edward is nearly 100 years old and Bella is shown to have a maturity level much higher than even most adults. She is smart, shy, secluded, and reliable. She is not your typical love-struck teenager.B) Because everybody dies, it is more emotionally realistic to the reader. First of all, everybody falls in love too. Second of all, Pro do realize that both HP and Twilight appeal mostly to teenage-young adult readers, right? You know what that means? Teenagers and young adults will be able to connect with a story about love much more than they would a story about death.2) Didn't I just argue this?This argument can be split into two parts, one for each of Pro's rebuttalsA) Pro seems to have missed my earlier argument about quality and quantity. It doesn't matter how many mythical creatures JK introduces, the question is do they hold their own against Stephanie's mythical creatures? I would say no for several reasons. Stephanie spends half the series adding to Edwards profile to make him a distinct and amazing character. She adds a a lot of visual description to him- everything from the color of his eyes to certain facial expressions he has. What mythical creature does JK do this for?B) I would like to ask why is Pro attacking Stephanie imagination at this point? The resolution was that Stephanie has researched her material also, not that she is more imaginative.My resolution. Stephanie has researched her material also because Twilight takes place in a real location with real people. This is not very different from Pro's resolution which wasJK has researched her material because she includes many mythical creatures and latin names that already existed.By attacking my resolution, Pro also attacks his.3) I didn't mean to say HP is more imaginative, I meant to say HP is more imaginative.Con says I misunderstood his point.My point: There can be, will be, and are books that relate directly to Twilight by Stephinie Meyers.Cons point: “My point is that there are books that relate directly to Harry Potter written by JK.”I'm not seeing much difference between our points. And to be clear, The Second life of Bree Tanner is in fact related to Twilight. 4) Con calls for all haters to unite!Con begins his stellar argument with this statement.“First I would like to point out that in my point, "we" means everyone that has read the two books and is on my side of the argument. The idea of the point is to prove it, as Con seems to misunderstand anyway.” The “point” was to show that Twilight is poorly written. “we” means everybody who already agreed with pro. The “point” of the “point” was to show how that Twilight is written poorly to those who already agreed with Con. This makes absolute no sense and is asking the readers to agree with him because they already agreed with him. Wtf??Con's second rebuttal is that Bella character is static. I'm going to have to disagree and say she is dynamic.Definiton of a Dynamic chacter “character who undergoes an important innerchange, as a change in personality or attitude”Bella undergoes an important innerchange when she meets Edward. She goes from being a reclusive and antisocial person along with hating her everything around her to being outgoing, wanting to hang around Edward instead of being reclusive, and loving her town, the people, and land around her.Simply put, Bella is not static.5)Much more predictability?First of all, just because Con has amazing phycic powers does not mean the rest of us normal people do. Stephanie spent an entire book creating a relationship between Jacob and Bella that created uncertainty in the reader who she loved more. This is why phrases such as “team Jacob” and “team Edward” started making appearances. The readers were unsure who Bella loved more and began to make their own opinions as to who she should choose. As for the Volturi; Neither me, the readers, nor Pro knew anything about them when they they were first introduced. So as to how Pro knew they wouldn't kill anybody is a mystery to me. And while I'm at it, I'm going to give a time line of Harry Potter. Harry Potter finds a magical world------> Bad Guy is stronger and creates havoc for Harry------> Harry saves the day and kills the bad guy.Geesh, wonder how JK came up with such a original and unpredicatable plotline....My CaseI would like to begin by saying that I indeed got fiction and nonfiction mixed up and would like to explain myself. You see, a large dwarf prostitute shot me in the eye with a fire arrow and hit the part of my brain that differentiates between fiction and nonfiction. Not likely you say? Well if you agree with Pro that HP is realistic, then you have no room to complain. Now on to my case.1) The fightingI did not say fighting scenes were necessary, I said they were important. Again, the point of writing a fiction book is to entertain and interest your readers. Most fiction books have fighting scenes because they do just that, entertain and grab interest. Since both Twilight and Harry Potter have fighting scenes, we shall not throw that point out. Con says that since Dementors can kiss the happiness right out of you, they make interesting fighters. No. All they can do is kiss you and fly around like retards trying to catch butterflies. All they do is creep towards you trying to smooch you to death. While they may be interesting characters, they are not interesting fighting characters. And I don't care how many spells are in Harry Potter, the fact doesn't change that they are a bunch of screaming idiots waving their wands around hoping to kill each other with balls of light. Twilight on the other hand involves hand to hand combat along with body decapitation and tank sized wolverines. Lastly, there are 56 vampires that fight in Twilight each having their own power. Clearly, fireballs is not the only power that is used from the vampires.When it comes to fightingWerewolves+Vampires> A bunch of hormonal teenage wizards.2) I'm going to go with love A) Edward does not stalk Bella while she sleeps. If you read the series, Edward is being protective of her from Venessa and newborn vampires that are trying to kill Bella. He is also fascinated with how she sleeps because he hasn't slept for over 100 years. If you want to call that stalking, be my guest.B) Jacob is not a pedo. Again, if you read the series you would know that he is not in love with Renesmee, he has a brotherly love for her. Big difference.C Sigh.. Pro seems to be stuck on the fact that an Author would want to make their fiction book more realistic. This defeats the purpose of of writing fiction and makes no sense. People's love life for the most part suck, so why would they want to read a realistic love story? For example, Is Romeo and Juliet realistic? No, yet people still call it one of the best love stories of all time. Why is that? Because it tells love as it should be, it makes the reader want to go make their own perfect love story. It is because of this that Harry Potter failes when it came to romance.It seems I'm out of characters...