AIS intersex people prove that God does not condemn gay marriage

I think it is very clear by this point my opponent should be docked any awarded conduct points. His debate strategy thus far has been insisting he defined this as only referring to the Christian God (by using the term 'Bible') despite never clarifying this and only using the generic term 'God', not 'God of the Bible' or 'Christian God'. My opponent should have indeed clarified which God he was referring to - in the first round of the debate. This is why definitions are so important. Beyond that, he has extended to personally insulting my knowledge of the Bible. I have no interest in quitting this debate because I don't quit debates.First off, my opponent argues I need to prove the Bible disagrees of homosexuality. Aside from the fact that I already have in round 2, where already established with three different sources (one from Christianity, Judaism and Islam) ban homosexual relations, I present multiple verse that condemn it such as Leviticus 20:13 ("If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.") Jude 1:7 ("Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.") and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 ("Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."), as well as verses like 1 Corinthians 7:2, ("But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband.") Romans 1:27 ("And the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.") that make it clear homosexuality is considered unnatural. If my opponent honestly wants to suggest the Bible condones homosexuality, he must be reading a different Bible. Bizarrely, my opponent than argues that hermaphrodites (I guess he's expanded to beyond AIS intersex folks?) are proof God didn't create us male and female, but in the very next paragraph he quotes a portion of the Bible that says God made us male and female. Well, which is it? Was God lying? If we are predicating this debate on the Christian God existing and him approving homosexuality, establishing him as a liar (which would contradict earlier points from my opponent) doesn't help that case at all.After this, my opponent attempts to claim the Torah is not a reliable source because I didn't quote exactly. This is an absurd argument - I do not need to quote directly from the Torah. I have supplied a source that explains the principle, and if my opponent doesn't want to read it that's his fault. Beyond that he asserts I haven't given a response to his claim it would not be 'just' for God to have a rule against AIS intersex individuals not having sex and that my opinion doesn't matter. This is a ridiculous straw man ploy, as my opponent has ignored two arguments (intersex individuals may have an exception from this law, and God might not exist) I gave on this, arguing as if I gave only one, and further my opponent is arguing that AIS individuals being bound to celibacy isn't 'just'. What definition of 'just' is he going by? His own opinion. Even further he states God's law does indeed change (which runs contrary to what my opponent said in round 2, that God's word does not change) and thus the Bible must approve of homosexuality under my opponent's definition of 'just'. Aside from the fact that even in the New Testament homosexuality is condemned, quite frankly at this point my opponent has contradicted himself so many times it's hard to argue against him because his stance is constantly changing.To conclude this round: my opponent has not established any sort of proof that the existence of AIS intersex individuals proves God endorses gay marriage. His arguments to this point have been contradictory, and have often gone into ranting or attacking me - not my stance. He has ignored key points of my argument and has done little to advance his own. He has been demanding I cite everything directly to scripture (even though there was no such precondition to this debate), including religious bans on homosexuality, even though I have already cited to scriptures that condemn homosexuality. He has contradictorily argued that I am arguing on my opinion, when he himself is basing his argument on his own definition of justice. It should be very clear at this point my opponent simply has no valid argument here - his resolution has been disproved.