Hillary Clinton's honesty relative to other politicians.

R2 RebuttalsThis took quite a bit of effort to track down and I couldn't disprove every claim. There are so many claims against Hillary Clinton that it is difficult to track them all down. " No WikiLeaks e-mails confirm that Hillary Clinton directly and knowingly "sold weapons to ISIS." " [2]There is insufficent proof to blame Hillary for weapons sold to ISIS."While some take issue with the word "exoneration," Bill Clinton’s broader point that his wife wasn’t found guilty is accurate. On balance, we rate his statement Mostly True." [3]Hillary was not found guilty in waterwater."Claim: Sec. of State Hillary Clinton's approval of a deal to transfer control of 20% of U.S. uranium deposits to a Russian company was a quid pro quo exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation." [4]The uranium claim is unproven either way.As for selling arms to China, it is difficult to take such claims seriously when such sites as infowars.com proliferate the claim. "Alex JonesAlex Jones Infowars The host of the nationally syndicated daily radio program “The Alex Jones Show,” Alex Jones helped build the media outlet InfoWars, which is a clearinghouse of conspiracy theory articles and videos, survivalist and prepper materials and health products. InfoWars serves as a breeding ground for conspiracy theories and other false reports that sometimes work their way up through the right-wing media. Jones has developed a relationship with 2016 GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, who has appeared on his show and hailed his “amazing” reputation." [6]Let's face it relying heavily upon conspiracy theories is a poor method of debating. Finally, as for your Saudi Arabia money claim, the foundation recieved the money not Hillary. "riebus said Clinton took "money from kings of Saudi Arabia and Morocco and Oman and Yemen."The monarchies of Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Oman have contributed to the Clinton Foundation, but Yemen, which does not have a king, has not.And although Priebus’ claim was made during a discussion of the foundation as well as contributions to political candidates, his phrasing could have left the impression that Clinton herself, rather than the foundation, received the money.For a statement that is partially accurate, our rating is Half True." [7]The Clinton foundation received the money, not Hillary herself. To summarize, my opponent relies heavily upon conspiracy theories which I have proven to be outright wrong, or not proven either way. The Saudi Arabia money was not send to Hillary Clinton, but the Clinton foundation instead.Hillary Clinton has been attacked for the political residue damage. If you study psychology people often only remember the claim, and not whether it was true or not. Therefore, Hillary's political opponent's have made bogus claim after claim hoping to damage her with the residue effect. ""Read behavioral science, read psychology," Clinton told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow this week. "Even when all the attacks prove to be unfounded, untrue, it leaves a residue." She added: "There is a concerted effort to try to make partisan advantage by really trying to throw so much at me that even if little splotches of it stick, it will cloud peoples's judgment of me. That is a burden I carry.""[8]Thank you for debating. Sources2. http://www.snopes.com...3. http://www.politifact.com...4. http://www.snopes.com...5. http://www.infowars.com...6. http://www.rightwingwatch.org...7. http://www.politifact.com...8. https://www.washingtonpost.com...