Sexism against men

Military Conscription Laughably, the only countries that were recognized Finland, Norway, Switzerland (countries where Political opposition to conscription is rather marginalized and heavily associated with historical there communist roots of these countries) and numerous other countries force men to serve in the military at the age of 18. I believe you claim of sexism upon these men that give services to their countries, are unfair. This seems more like a case of gender inequality. Men are not being discriminated against based on there sexual orientation, in fact, I would like to contrast your claim and say that this is systematic. I mean, think about it, if this is really sexism. Think u Taxpayers pay for young men to serve in the military liable to serve either six, nine or twelve months in many different fields. moreover this training happens because in the event of a state of emergence (which is always likley considering the geographical postions) these men can protect the females and children, ditto, the biologically heritage of there people. Moreover, females can get jobs so they can provide resources of there family, especially, there children. A reversal in gender roles may be counterproductive because men are biologically made to, well, hunt/kill/ assist female egg and will serve better in the military then females-statistically. Women are to work as central to the economy; however, this phenomenon is common in places they were previously repressed of rights, while men go to war. Also, Work is not highly segregated by sex; and NOTE that these countries also give choice to females over their reproductive bodies. And we can assume that women have always traditionally been assigned housework and child-rearing responsibilities and had been socialized to be passive, submissive, and "feminine." State pensions & Child custody Simply, the answer is because even though men and women are equally qualified-cum-equally qualified, women may face a buffer, because they are arbitrary and often have invisible barriers (discriminating ones) that limit women"s advancement worldwide. Not many of women labor workers reach managerial, supervisory, executive, or administrative positions. Make it more inviting for them to turn to jobs that are physically less demanding. Also make it more inviting to be mothers and retire earlier, or less kindly put, because they become usless to the workforce of that country. Check this fact, according to a UN report As of 2006, only 4.7% of managerial and administrative positions in Korea were occupied by women For comparison, women occupying those positions amounted to 32% in Spain, 33% in England, 36% in New Zealand, 37% in Canada, and 44% in the US. The rate for Japan was 9.5%, and even Pakistan, which is also a male-dominant society, had a higher rate than that of Korea at 8%. Another survey in that year, 2006, showed that 57.5% of female respondents experienced discrimination based on gender while looking for a job. Sadly this mean that Among these countries, (OECD countries) women receive about 81% of the income men receive. Which makes it almost imposible for most of these women to have supporing income for there child. This may be why we see many cases of poor bastard or broken young teenage boys in places like New York selling crack to help there mother pay for shelter and food. Also, in my opinion, which is influenced from various scientific and biological theorys, inequality results from direcly from the organization of our society, not from any significant biological or personality differences between men and women. sources http://www.britannica.com... Glick, Peter, and Susan T Fiske. "An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality." American Psychologist 56.2 (2001): Jacobs, Jerry A, Kathleen Gerson, and Jerry A Jacobs. The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Robeyns, Ingrid. "Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities." Feminist economics 9.2-3 (2003): 61-92. Harvard University Press, 2004.109.Ridgeway, Cecilia L. "Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment." American Sociological Review (1997): 218-235.