Did Jesus Exist

First of all, the Jews wouldn't violate the Mitzvah, we 're incapable of it, so not only is it unlikely that we killed Jesus, it's also impossible, especially considering how it was the Romans. Number two, the Romans wouldn't execute someone unless there were some kind of hearing, and there wasn't, thus, it is impossible for him to have been executed. We find a similar issue with the story of Joseph and Mary having to go to Bethlehem to file their taxes, the Romans would hold record of this sort of thing, yet we find that there was zero record of either of these two existing, thus they didn't. Secondly, the BOP is on you to prove Jesus was real, I proved that there is no proof that he ever existed, and since if he existed there would be proof, we may conclude that he never existed. And your comparison between Jesus and Alexander the great is demonstratibly false, Alexander the great left lasting landmarks as well as brought Greek influence to Egypt which thus proves he existed. Just because someone else wasnt documented as much as usual doesn't mean that the guy with zero proof of his existence was real. Thirdly, towns in the 1st century Palestine were not illiterate, Jews always knew how to read and write, they never forgot. So they wouldn't need scribes, and Paul's letters don't count as records, in fact there is a lot of evidence that your entire Non-Testament was tampered with by Constantine, while our Torah is the exact same Torah as 4000 years ago. Fourthly, no, the burden of proof isn't on me because you made the claim that Jesus existed, I proved there is no proof of this, and if it happened, there would likely be proof, thus it is false. So far there is zero proof that a man named Jesus ever existed, I can prove G-ds existence, but you cant prove Jesus's existence, Moshe and Avram they also have been proven, why then can't Jesus be? And why does your belief get to be "true until proven wrong" that's not how it works, claims are to be false until proven true, something you failed to fulfil. For example, I say G-d exists, can I prove this- yes, G-d have us a very simple way to prove he exists, and here's how; there were 3 million witnesses of G-d giving Moshe the Torah on mount Sinia, very simple. If you think that Jesus is the same G-d, and that G-d never changes, why then didn't he do likewise and give you irrefutable evidence of his existence? No, rather, he tells you to just have faith, congratulations, your religion offers the same reasons to believe as Islam and many others, believe what I want you to or burn in hell, what's new? Which brings me to yet another point, you in round 1 defined Jesus as a "teacher who taught morals," while this is easily refutable, since Jesus didn't teach morals, that would imply he told people to be a good person, yet, your entire Non-Testament seems to say that you go to heaven by worshipping a man as G-d. That faith, not works, saves you, something in direct violation of these verses: Ezekiel 14:14 says "even if these three men--Noah, Daniel and Job--were in it, they could save only themselves by their righteousness, declares the Sovereign LORD." Ezekiel 18:21-23: "But if a wicked man turns from all his sins which he has committed, keeps all My statutes, and does what is lawful and right, he shall surely live; he shall not die. 22 None of the transgressions which he has committed shall be remembered against him; because of the righteousness which he has done, he shall live. 23 Do I have any pleasure at all that the wicked should die?" says the Lord God, "and not that he should turn from his ways and live?" So as you can see, Jesus's version of morality was a little off, especially since he wanted to be G-d, which is a very bad sin, see Ezekiel 28 and Isaiah 14. Also, you might want to see this debate, it's very interesting and every Christian should see it. (http://www.debate.org...)