God exist, and belief in His existence is rationally justified.

Pro thinks I have contradicted myself but this is not the case.The claim that X can't be known to be true and X can be known to be false are not inherently contradictory.For example if I said every universe has a guy named jim, I can't verify the truth of that claim, because universes are always being formed, however if I find one without a guy named jim, then the claim is false." Let's say a tornado rustled through a junkyard and at the end it created a 2014 Kia Soul. We would knowthat's impossible, that's improbable. Also, natural laws can only act on things that already exist, so they can't be the first cause for the universe."The reason why we can say things have a cause is because they began in time. If there's no time before the universe, then the notion of a cause is incoherent. It's like saying X>Y. When did X>Y? Never.Well that makes no sense. 2ndLawofTD:Now CalTech Cosmologist Sean Carrol offers an interesting idea.What if there is no thermodynamic equilibrium?Problems of eternality apply to god as well:If he is eternal, then we run into some big problems with infinity, just like an eternal universe.If god has always existed, then that would mean, an infinite amount of events would of had to have passed. However, as stated by pro, infinity can only be approached, not realized. In such a case, god would logically have to have a beginning as well. Multiverse as an explanation for life permitting parameters and beginning: 1. Let's visit the multiverse. The multiverse is a natural consequence of inflation. Via BICEP2 Primordial gravitation waves have been detected, which is almost indisputable proof of inflation.Inflation accounts for the:1.Uniformity. The cosmic background radiation is quite uniform. Inflation adequately accounts for the uniformity. A uniform region expanded rapidly, evolving into our visible universe.2. Mass density. Inflation predicts the omega should 1. The Planck satellite measures the omega as 1, which means our universe should be flat, which it is.3.Small non-uniformity. The small non-uniformity in the universe is easily accounted for by quantum fluctuations, which have been observed in the CBR.As explained the multiverse is a consequence of inflation. All the other predictions have come true. I would say that would constitute a good reason to think the multiverse is true.Via inflation, some parts of the early universe expanded more than other, created bublbles of space time, which later developed into other universes, and our universe is just a bubble universe and requires no creator just a prior universe. The multiverse can be eternal."I strongly disagree. I'm not saying that God or this being has no value in space or time. I'm saying that because He created space and time He cannot be bound by either." In order for god to create space and time, he would have to precede space and time, meaning at some point, he would have to have no value in space or time. Once again, if something has no value in space or time, it does not exists.Pro sholuld have to explain how something exists outside space and time. "intelligence" -.-:Ifinite regression!If anything with intelligence comes from prior intelligence, then god must have come from prior intelligence. Is god not intelligent?It is absurd to argue everything intelligent comes from prior intelligence but the most intelligent being conceivable doesn't.Conclusion:1. Pro has not established that everything needs a cause. I showed the opposite through quantum physics.Even if everything in the universe needs a cause, we can't say the universe itself, needs a cause.2. The biggest problem with a being creating the universe, is that the being would have to exist outside of space and time, which is nonsense.https://www.astro.rug.nl... http://arxiv.org...