Is it moral that you should die if you are gay, Blaspheme, Worship other gods etc? God thinks so

Good Morning, It seems that you have strayed away from the initial prompt for the debate in favor of expressing your feelings about Christianity. After the debate, I will be happy to talk to you about those feelings if you want, But until then if we could just focus on facts, Not feelings. I will respond to two things: 1) My right to answer the questions in such a way that I am satisfied that the truth has been accurately presented. 2) Your rebuttal to a few of the initial topics. Now, To your post; First, The wording of your questions indicated you do not have even an elementary understanding of the dynamics of the Old Testament Laws or the Covenants. To answer your questions without at least some clarification would be to misrepresent the truth. For example, If a stranger came up to me while I was eating alone in a restaurant and asked me, "Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Answer me yes or no right now. ", That is not a question I can answer without clarifying a few things. Initially, The stranger is assuming I am married. Beyond this, If I say no, It indicates that I am still beating her. If I say yes it means I had previously been beating her. The fact is I never was beating her in the first place, But if I can not explain that, The stranger would never know the truth. So please, Extend the courtesy of allowing me to explain the subject if it is being misrepresented. Contrary to popular belief, The Bible does actually require careful study to understand many of the doctrinal distinctives; so while the primary message of sin, Savior and how to live a loving God-centered life is clear, Not everything is so clear. 2) Now I will clarify a bit more the concept of working on the Sabbath and why it warrants death. I did not explain my answer well. The Jewish Sabbaths were holy days set aside for nationwide worship of God. God as the King of Israel, The God who saved them from Egyptian slavery and formed them into a people, Set the laws of the nations. They were not slaves to that nation, And they swore they would abide by the rules that God set (Exodus 19:8). God warned that as King, The nation would run in the way He prescribed, And to transgress the law would result in punishment; death in the case of the topics you presented. The day of rest (the Sabbaths) was a blessing to the people and was a time for them to enjoy time off of work and to reflect on the God that saved and protected them. To be over consumed with work to the neglect of God is not good for the human body, Mind or spirit. To despise God's command is to say that you reject the good He did and the good He still promised. The Sabbaths also pointed forward to the future kingdom that God promised where the Messiah (Christ) would rule perfectly and forever as King. To ignore the Sabbath in Israel and work is to say that you do not care about God or His promised Messiah. Since God and His laws are by nature life-giving (Proverbs 6:23), To reject them is by nature death. God is by nature of who He is the Judge of the world and the Dispenser of Justice. No one could fill these roles but HIm. His standard is what matters. Just as the child does not make the rules of the house or set the standards by which he/she will live, Neither does the human tell God how they will live and what consequences are fitting. Now, As I said before, These civil consequences (i. E. Capital punishment) were localized to ancient national Israel. While God still considers these actions to be sin, And they make us worthy of death, We are no longer under the threat of the death penalty for them. Also, Christians are not called to enact the death penalty, Which you seemed to indicate is the case. God never commanded that we do that. The power to enforce civil punishment only falls within the purview of the government (Romans 13), And I do not want to kill you or anyone for what they believe. Now what Christ did was a type of work that was morally permissible (Matthew 12). He healed people and picked food to eat. The legalistic Pharisees had corrupted the intention of God in overregulating the rules to the point of absurdity. Jesus went on to say that He was the Lord of the Sabbath, Meaning He was the promised Messiah to which the Sabbath was pointing. We enter into His rest, As He pays the price for our sins and purchases for us the inheritance of eternal life. That is the purpose of the Jewish Sabbath. After Christ was resurrected, Fulfilling the Sabbath and drawing in people from all over the world, We see a new tradition take the place of the Saturday Sabbath, The gathering of believers for corporate worship on Sunday, The day Jesus rose from the dead. The Lords Day is not the Sabbath, And while it should be a day set aside for corporate worship and a time of rest and reflection on God, The Civil Laws of Ancient Israel (working on the Sabbath) do not apply to this day. There is no indication anywhere in Scripture that this should be the case. Christ is the true Sabbath. 3) The word "at" is not in the text. The reason I am picking at the small distinction is that the Hebrew word, "qalal" carries with it the idea of holding someone in contempt, Despising and acting towards someone in a trifling or dishonorable way. It is more than just saying a bad word. It most definitely includes speech, But it is more than that (Ezekiel 22:7 notes that God is displeased because "father and mother are treated with contempt" 5) For the sake of clarity in this debate, I will not deal in hypotheticals. If your only rebuttal for my position is a hypothetical, Then I think that subject should be closed. 6) If you would like to make the existence of God a subject for another debate, I would be very happy to engage in that. In short though just to give you something, The fact that the universe exists is evidence of a Creator. The universe shows His eternal power and divine nature (Romans 1). The Bible is the evidence of the personal nature of God and reveals to us what His will is. As you noted, There is no test (I am assuming you mean scientific) that can show us God, As science deals with things in the realm of the natural, Not the supernatural. The only way we could see God is if He chose to reveal Himself to us, Which He did when He showed Himself to the Hebrews as recorded in the Old Testament, And in Jesus as recorded in the New Testament. Historical evidence, While not "science" is still a valid evidentiary means.