Islam (Pro) vs. Christianity (Con)

Had a feeling I would regret his debate. If you had two brain cells and were able to read. You would have checked the comments where I said that I will refute Churchianity in round 2 and will defend Islam in round 3. You have wasted your entire just showing everybody how much of a sad lonely old bitch you are and provided 0 intelligeble argument for your cross-worshipping polytheist faith where God dies. Grow up and cut the swears because I will not tolerate being insulted or uselss and pointless towards my faith.IslamScientific miracles Big bang in the Qu'ran 21:30 : Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were one mass, and We tore them apart and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?Earth and the heavens in Arabia is an idiom that means the universe or everything. (https://science.nasa.gov...)Expansion of the universe 51:47 : And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.This is only being discovered nowadays with modern technology that did not exist back then. (http://skyserver.sdss.org...) Life is made of water 21:30 : Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were one mass, and We tore them apart and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?Now we know that the cell is mostly water. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...) and also the primary hypothesis on the origin of life called abiogenesis speculates that life came from water.Two seas25:53 : And He it is Who has let flow forth the two large bodies of water, one sweet and palatable, and the other salty and bitter; and He has set a barrier and an insurmountable, forbidding ban that keeps them apart.There is no way that an Arab illiterate shepherd on a massive landlocked in an isolated city could have known this 1400 years ago because all the cases of such are in the western hemisphere.This scientific foreknowledge is confirmed in Alaska (https://www.adn.com...) and In the gulf of mexico (http://captaingino.com...) + (http://www.einfopedia.com...) Halocline also is a witness to this foreknowledge. (http://www.whoi.edu...) + (http://www.divediscover.whoi.edu...)These are four among thousands if not more.Linguistic miracleQu'ran has produced a simple challenge that nobody has been able to fulfill. If you doubt the Qu'ran is from God, then write a Surah or a chapter like the one in the Qu'ran and let's see if you will be able to prove the Qu'ran is man-made. Qur'an 2:23 is where the challenge is. NOBODY has been able to fulfill this challenge to prove the Qu'ran is not from Allah since if it was Muhammad (PBUH) who can not read nor write and had very basic poetry challenges then it should be easy to replicate the poetry skills of an illiterate man but it is from God and nobody can compete with God's skills.Prophet Muhammad in the bibleDeutronomy 18 :18I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. (KJV)The criteria is clear as day : 1- The prophet has to be from among the brethern of the Jews.2- The Prophet has to be like Moses3- He will speak what he is commanded and will put my words in his mouth1) If you remember all the way back to Genesis 21, Abraham had two sons Isaac and Ishmael. The two are brethern or brothers. Ishamael became the grandfather of the Arabs and Isaac became the grandfather of the Jews. The brothers of the Jews are the Ishamaelites or the Arabs. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was an Arab.2) Prophet Muhammad is more similar to Moses than Jesus because they were both were given comprehensive law and code for life, both led armies and encountered enemies, Both migrated following conspiracies of their assasination, they were both married, they both had a natural death, etc. 3) This phrase is important in light of the fact that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was illiterate and could not read nor write and his message was unique in that the Qu'ran is literally the actual words of God. That is what God meant when he said he will put his actual words into the mouth of the words, in that the words and the revelation of the Prophet will be the actual words of God which will be put and recited by the mouth of the Prophet. Jesus' revelation obviously did not have this feature but that was a feature of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).The Prophet was different from the Messiah as evident from John 1:19-21. If you read it the Jews were expecting three different people ; The messiah, elijah and the prophet. This indicates that the messiah is a different person from the prophet so if you want to claim that Jesus is the prophet, then he can not be the messiah.I will make sure to try to discuss The fulfilled prophecies in the hadith in the next rounds (especially the fulfilled prophecies about the minor signs that we are apporoaching the end of times like increase in crossdressing and increase in homosexuality).Rebuttals to Con's "arguments"On Fulfilled Prophecy If your main argument for Christianity's truth is fulfilled prophecies of Jesus, then you paint Jesus as the fattest failure of history. If you claim that Jesus is the messiah then he should fulfill ALL the prophecies of the old testament. Let's see what your "messiah" has failed to do. The Messiah must be a member of the tribe of Judah (Genesis 49:10) and a direct descendant of King David & King Solomon (2 Samuel 7:12-14; 1 Chronicles 22:9-10). Genealogy in the Bible is only passed down from father to son (Numbers 1:1-18). There is no evidence that Jesus really had this pedigree, and the Christian Bible actually claims that he did not have a “birth-father” from the tribe of Judah descending from King David and King Solomon (Matt. 1:18-20). When the Messiah is reigning as King of Israel, the Jews will be ingathered from their exile and will return to Israel, their homeland (Deut. 30:3; Isaiah 11:11-12; Jeremiah 30:3, 32:37; Ezekiel 11:17, 36:24). This has clearly not yet happened and we still await its fulfillment. There are more Jews outside of Israel than there are in Israel. The Temple in Jerusalem will be rebuilt (Isaiah 2:2-3, 56:6-7, 60:7, 66:20; Ezekiel 37:26–27; Malachi 3:4; Zech. 14:20-21). The Temple was still standing in Jesus’ day. It was destroyed 38 years after Jesus’ crucifixion and it has not yet been rebuilt. There will be universal disarmament and worldwide peace with a complete end to war (Micah 4:1-4; Hoseah 2:20; Isaiah 2:1-4, 60:18). Wars have increased dramatically in the world since the start of Christianity. The Messiah will reign as King at a time when all the Jewish people will observe G-d’s commandments (Ezekiel 37:24; Deut. 30:8,10; Jeremiah 31:32; Ezekiel 11:19-20, 36:26-27). Jesus never ruled as King, nor have all Jews embraced the commandments of G-d’s Torah. The Messiah will rule at a time when all the people of the world will come to acknowledge and serve the one true G-d (Zechariah 3:9, 8:23,14:9,16; Isaiah 45:23, 66:23; Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 38:23; Psalm 86:9; Zeph. 3:9). This, as well, has not yet taken place and we await its fulfillment by how many different religions there is. On protection from corruptionQu'ran IS perfectly perserved word-for-word from the time of the Prophet (PBUH). You can go check the sanaa' manuscript and the birmingham manuscript both dated to within the lifetime of the prophet minimum to 10 years after his death maximum. Assuming the hijazi dialect of the Arabic Language then the Qu'ran was protected word-for-word, something your false bible is demonstrably a failure at.AbrogationYour allegations are baseless and should be treated as such. The doctrine of abrogation is that of REVELATIONS not of verses so when the Qu'ran is saying that Allah is abrogating the Ayah (arabic for revelations or signs) then he is meaning that he is replacing one revelation (false corrupted bible) by another better revelation (Qu'ran). I do not know where you get the "verses" from. Maybe the translation.DajjalYou mentioned two hadeeths for this, BOTH from Abu Dawud. Sunni Muslims only accept two hadith collections Saheeh Bukhari and Saheeh Muslim. You are quoting universally rejected sources among muslims. Some hadeeths in Abu Dawud are reliable, the vast majority are unreliable and rely on unreliable narrators or The Prophet's Jewish nenemies.H2OYou failed miserably at the attempt to justify your worship of 3 Gods. What you are invoking is a heresy called modalism or sabellianism (https://en.wikipedia.org...). The trinity teaches that are 3 different beings who SIMULTAENOUSLY exist among each other, each being is fully God. That's three Gods. Your analogy fails because water exists as gas, liquid or solid, one at a time NOT simultaeonusly, as the trinity preaches its beings exist. To make your analogy more accurate is to have water is that is gas or wate vapor in a jar existing along side a cup of water that has liquid water existing alongside an ice cube. Three different distinct entities that are all 100% water so there are 3 waters. Same with the trinity. Three different distinct beings who are all 100% God. That's 3 Gods whether you like it or not. You are a polytheist. If your analogy works, then there is one God but he is sometimes the father, then at other times the son then at other times the holy spirit but he can not be all three at the same time. You are faced with a massive problem. Jesus or the son on Earth used to talk to the father in heaven all the time.