Muhammed is Not Predicted in the Bible.

Well, the reason why Christians deny the Quran as the final revelation is because it contradicts the Ingil and even seems to contradict itself in many places. I also find it kind of funny when you say that you criticize logically when your god said in the Quran that to question Islam and have doubts in unallowed. You can't seek the Truth without doubts sister! Abraham did indeed marry his step sister. We also know for a fact that Cain married his sister and yet Muslims don't cry about that do they? Abraham was before the Levitical Law and you'll also know that marrying family members was allowed then, but was but allowed under the Law of Moses. As a side note, to say that she was just a sister in faith is a forced interpretation of the text and doesn't fit in the context. As for whether Abram sacrificed Ishmael or Isaac is pretty clear. First off, we know for historical facts that the Torah has not been corrupted as you say it has due to many of the Dead Sea scrolls, Masoreric texts, portions of ancient scripture, and even Rabbinical sources. The beliefs and traditions that Isaac was sacrificed go back to the very beginning, but when we see a book written in the desert thousands of years later with no archeological and historical support it seems very implausible that the Quran is legit. It also greatly disturbs me that you call the Jewish people r"cist which is just wrong. GOSPEL OF BARNABAS........... Really :) The Gospel of Barnabas has been cast aside by Christian, Atheist, Agnostic, and every legitimate Islamic scholar, both Shiite and Sunni as false. We know for 100% FACT that the Gospel of Barnabas was written in Medieval 16th century Spain( Guess it's a bit past medieval, but you get the point.) ONLY 2 poorly made manuscripts were found IN Spain and written IN Spanish of all languages. The only manuscript of it that we have today comes from the 18th century. The great Islamic scholar Abbas al Akked says that this is a very late book. We also see that there are plenty of geographical errors which prove that the people, or person, who wrote it had never been to Israel and knew nothing about it. If you like to see something that is more legit I would encourage you that you look at the Epistle of Barnabas which can be dated to early Christianity and which shows that Jesus is God in it. Lastly I just want to show something about the Quran. In the Quran it says that if you have questions go to the people of the book( Jews and Christians.) It also says that the followers of Jesus would last to the end of days. You can claim that this means muslims, but we have historical proof that there were no Muslims in the time of Christ. The Quran also says that followers of Jesus would become powerful soon after which only happened when Constantine converted. Quran says Jesus never claimed Godhood Roman historians, First century Rabbinical sources, Temple Authorities, Christian Gospels, Early Church Fathers( Students and prot"g"es of original 12), Early Christian Traditions, the Didache, and even the Talmud state that Jesus claimed to be God. Who do I believe History or a book written by a desert man? I'll take history. We have over 30,000 copies of manuscripts that all say the same thing. The preservation of scripture can be traced back to Jesus himself. We also have quotes from early Christians and Church Fathers who quote directly and precisely from the Bible we have today. We also have the Magdalen Papyrus which many historians believe is a section of Mathews ORIGINAL Gospel. And guess what, it matches perfectly. We have so many identical manuscripts through history that are identical that it makes the couple versions of the Quran look pretty wimpy. As for the OT, the Dead Sea scrolls matched up PERFECTLY with our Bibles today. There are actually much more evidence that the Quran has been corrupted then the Bible has. Thanks and back to you