The Christian God Does Not Exist

Con has accused me of red herrings, however this is not the case.Free will is relevant because, the trim-omni god would have free will, by virtue of omnipotence, but the tri-omni god can't have free will by virtue of omniscience. Human free will is important in the context of omnibenevolence, because omnibenevolence only makes sense in the context of morality, but if DCT is true, and we have no free-will, then morality makes no sense.Now on to direct refutations:Con has conceded two of my arguments.Con says: "Omniscience co-exists with omnipotence. In my previous example, if i knew that you were going to get hit by a car tomorrow, that foreknowledge gives me the ability to either prevent that from happening or allowing it. Your argument then breaks down."This is a vague and false analogy, if in this analogy, you don't have complete forknowledge, then you are not omiscient.If god is omniscient then he has forknowledge that I will get hit by a car. If he knows I will get hit by the car, then I must get hit by the car. If he can save me from getting hit by the car, then it is not the case he 100% knew I would get hit by the car.P:If god is one hundred percent omniscient, then he is sure I will get hit by the car tomorrow.Q: I must get hit by the car tomorrowIf P Then Necessarily Q.In order for him to save me from getting hit by the car, there most be a possibility for me to not get hit by the car.However if he knows I'm going to be hit by a car, then there is no possibilty for me to not get hit by the car.In response to my omnibenevolence, omnipotence paradox, con says:" 1) You strayed from the definitions i set and introduced a concept called "the greater good" 2) I never said that God can act in contrary to the greater good, i said that all good is subject to God's laws. Let me repeat what i said: "It is you who introduced the greater good.con says:" That being said, whatever God considers "good" and "evil" is subject to his interpretation, not yours. If God sees it best for you to suffer in order to discover the fullest power of good in a world of evil then that is "good."You explicitly state that god must act in order to achieve the "fullest good." So let me restate my argument in your terms:P1) An omnibenevolent god must act in a way that achieves the "fullest good"P2) An omnipotent god can act in a way that does not achieve the "fullest good"C) Omnibenevolence and omnipotence are incompatabile If he can act in a way that is contrary to the fullest good, then he is not omnibenevolent, if he can not, then he is not omnipotent.Free will again:You are right, I did not define what free will is, I more importantly defined what free will is not. And as far as I can see you did not have a problem with that definition,so let me reformulate my free willl argument.P1) If your future actions can be known with 100% accuracy, then you don't have free will.P2) An omnipotent god can have free will.P3) An omniscient god knows all his future actions with 100% accuracy.C) An omnipotent and omniscient god is a contradictionP1 is true by my definition of not free will.P2 is true by definition of omnipotent (able to do any act).P3 is true by definition of omniscience(complete knowledge of all things)C: An omnipotent god has the abilty to have free will, which as far as we can see is not having your future actions known with 100% accuracy. So in order to have free will, then god can't have his future actions known with 100% accuracy.However an omniscient god must, by definition, be able to know all future events with a 100% accuracy. By knowing all events with 100% accuracy, he by default knows his future events with 100% accuracy, there for he does not have free wil. There for in order to have free will, he must forfeit omniscience.Con has not responded to my omnipotence paradox p1)An omnipotent god can perform all acts p2)An omnipotent god can't deny himself(which is an act)c1)True Omnipotence does not existc2)Beings defined as omnipotent don't exist. Conclusion:This has been a fun and entertaining and challenging debate.I have droped some of my contentions, but remember, if even one of my arguments is true, then the resolution is affirmed, and I have affrimed 3.