It is irrational for God to hold humanity to a code God does not follow

1. Without further ado, here is my response: (a)My opponent has accepted part A of this resolution that states that "For the purposes of this debate, God is assumed to exist. " Therefore, the Judeo-Christian God exists, at least as far as I and my opponent are concerned. If the Judeo-Crhistian God exists, then morality is properly understood in the context by which it is established by the Judeo-Christian God; specifically, that context is overriding contractual duties. Morality is the price God exacts in exchange for God's blessings in the Bible … it is not intended to be a method of promoting man or fulfilling man's desires of peace, but in fulfilling God's desires on earth, as follows: (b) "God created man. "[1] (c) God created [2] and covenanted with men. [3] (d) God is not equal to man, nor does he hold himself out to be. [4] [5] 2. Men are God's bondsmen, not his equals (a) Men are God's bondsmen to work his will on earth. [6] [7] (b) Morality allows God's bondsmen to perform properly. [8] (c) Additionally, acting morally purchases for God's followers God's continued devotion. [9] 3. Utility requires equality in the agents, or a direct parallel can not be drawn. (a) Moral action is not founded in a cost/benefits analysis of free actors, through hedonism, [10] but rather (b) a breach of contract analysis in relation to an obligor and obligee in an agreement. [11] 4. Good is relative to how well an act fulfills God's will God has covenanted with his people, that they must fulfill their covenant by punishing or avoiding certain actions. His people, therefore, have a duty, overriding the pursuit of the people's happiness, which obviates utilitarian consideration of each individual in exchange for duty-based conformity to contract. [12] 5. It is therefore rational for God to expect compliance with a morality than benefits Himself, not his people, for God desires that his people act for his benefit, not their own. The resolution is therefore NEGATED, as it is rational for God, being unequal, above and separate in rights from mankind, to demand of mankind fulfillment of their agreement with him. Humans may establish rights in relation to each other; but as for God, morality comes only in fulfillment of mankind's contractual obligations. [13] 6. Sources [1] . http://www.mechon-mamre.org... [2] "Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams. " 1 Samuel 15:22 [3] . http://en.wikipedia.org... [4] . http://withoutthegate.com... [5]. http://bible.logos.com... Chapter 5 [6] . http://bible.cc... [7] . http://www.stempublishing.com... [8] . http://www.boundless.org... [9] . http://www.gotquestions.org... [10] . http://en.wikipedia.org... "since only the consequences of an action matter, and only happiness matters, the action is the one that results in the greatest sum of happiness. " [11] . http://en.wikipedia.org... "Breach of contract is a legal concept in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. " A contractual agreement clearly overrides hedonistic urges. [12] . http://business-law.lawyers.com... See Nonperformance [13] . http://www.tecmalta.org...