Evolution is more credible than Creationism revisited after 2 yrs

Lies? you honestly have no idea of evolution? Then Why did you accept this debate? Did you NOT read the description of Evolution?you mistakenly state- "Your argument shows a deep lack of understanding about the theory of Evolution."You are honestly attempting to interject a KNOWN LIE, easily proven false by suggesting the dictionary itself IS MISTAKEN on WHAT EVOLUTION actually IS?ev"o"lu"tion1. the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.synonyms:Darwinism, natural selection2. The gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form. To which I remind you we all own dictionaries, and scientific literature citing Darwin as Founder of the Theory! Yet YOU have the temerity to suggest, DAWIN himself didn't know what EVOLUTION WAS? https://www.livescience.com...This clearly shows Darwin AS the father of Evolution! Notice- the part that states DEVELOPED the theory of Evolution.Darwin himself penned The Origins of Life.Evolution: Summary of Darwin's Theory of Evolution. A species is a population of organisms that interbreeds and has fertile offspring. Living organisms have descended with modifications from species that lived before them. http://www.pbs.org...That Science was incapable of creating an organism capable of producing Living offspring which is intoduced into the KNOWN populace of Living creatures ON EARTH, is the death nell of evolution. It simply didn't happen. Thus scientists attempted to suggest "adaption as Evolution" This to was easily proven false as the species REMAIN fully intact. Incapable of becoming a totally separate species at all. Obviously you failed to read the last debate where Matt8800, also attempted to LIE!The evidence is well documented ... every species on EARTH remains withing it's species. absolutely NO evidence of a NEW SPECIES being created by a different species. Example; Birds remain Birds, Lizards remain lizards, Dogs remain Dogs, Cats remain cats and so forth and so on!You have 0 proof in support of your opening statement whatsoever. IF your going to CLAIM the dictionary and Darwin Himself is WRONG on what EVOLUTION IS ... that is a bold statement: Best you understand what adaption IS, before CLAIMING evolution is NOT merely adaption. note definition:Definition of adaptation 1 : something that is adapted a new adaptation of an old recipe ; specifically : a composition rewritten into a new form a screen adaptation of a novel 2 : the act or process of adapting a process undergoing adaptation : the state of being adapted adaptation to changing circumstances 3 : adjustment to environmental conditions: such as a : adjustment of a sense organ to the intensity or quality of stimulation b : modification of an organism or its parts that makes it more fit for existence under the conditions of its environment : a heritable physical or behavioral trait that serves a specific function and improves an organism's fitness or survival This is what you CLAIM is Evolution and it is Clear it is NOT! You attempt to steal the defintion of Adaption and place it in the definition of EVOLUTION. You have neither the right nor authority to alter definitions to salvage your delusional views. Thus let us begin gain shall we? Re-read my opening. Refresh yourself ON EVOLUTION, then comeback with FACTS, not delusional easily proven LIES opinions. Perhaps you should read The Origins of Life FROM Darwin himself? you seriously don't appear to know WHAT Evolution actually IS?Some helpful hints I will provide you;Oh and when you FINISH your game? REALIZE that Scientific experiments PROVED that NONE of this actually HAPPENED!Science couldn't create ANYTHING that HAS CRAWLED out of soup, mud or OOZE ... EVER!So Life didn't BEGIN at all according to Science itself! Yet here we are? But according to Hard Scientific .. LIFE (living animals and Humans) should NOT exist at all!Thus the only viable explanation ... well you can read MY intro again, since you clearly didn't or simply IGNORED the debate opening statement entirely and wanting to just reoffer lies and OPINIONS already proven LIES. YOU CAN'T SHOW Life beginning at all. So we EVOLVED FROM NOTHING, and continue to evolve from that same nothing? is just to stupid to even consider AS an argument.I mean that's a Bill and Teds excellent adventure sort of argument isn't it? WE don't exist but we evolve anyway? DUH!Try a Little harder BUD! at the very least DON'T TRY Telling us the Dictionnary and Darwin is WRONG on WHAT evolution IS according to this or that wacko.it still works out to the Basic unanswerable question? IF we couldn't possibly EXIST because science HAS proven we did not FORM from Bacteria, unicellular or multicellular organisms, or by amino-acids, or by protiens or y ANY METHOD, Life failed to reach the Alive and living stage of walking about on Earth. Then we shouldn't even exist .... BUT WE DO EVOLVE ANYWAY?Did you hit your head?