The Osama Bin Laden assassination orchestrated by the U.S Obama administration on May 1-2 2011.

First off, I clarified that we are not debating whether Osama was killed by U.S marines, we are debating whether he was killed in the supposed U.S assassination attempt, on May 1-2 2011. Keep in mind, the president saying so is not a 100% proof that that happened, obviously, he had a definite motive to lie about that, we'll get to that. And just stating a report by Hersh isn't enough, you need to elaborate on the report for it to do anything, you can't JUST give sources. And yes, Bin Laden was confirmed dead, but we'll get to that. Now first, the evidence against the supposed assassination is a lack of evidence supporting it, the first is the refusal of the Obama administration to release photographic evidence that Osama Bin Laden was killed. After the assassination Obama refused to release death photos of Osama Bin Laden [1] This is very important because it while Obama claims to have killed Bin Laden, he refused to release evidence to prove his claim. However their refusal to release evidence goes further than this, the Obama administration was requested to release DNA evidence that proves that it was Bin Laden who was killed, as they supposedly did DNA tests. [2] Obama claimed to refuse to release photos due to fear that it would be used as a propaganda tool, (although if this was the fear I question why he would openly want to assassinate Bin Laden in the first place, in this case that could surely be used as a propaganda tool as well.) But with DNA evidence, this fear evaporates, but they still refused to give out this evidence. Another strange instance is the 25 minute blackout on the cameras which were mounted on the helmets of the soldiers invading the compound. As said by the CIA director, Leon Panetta, who is as the know as you say, as the soldiers entered the compound, very conveniently, the cameras suffered from a blackout, however, after this was said and done, their cameras immediately came back. [3] While it is certainly possible that this could happen, this occurrence is highly improbable, and is yet another instance of a lack of evidence that Bin Laden was killed on May 1-2 2011. Another anomaly with the assassination is that the official account of the assassination consistently changed after is supposedly occurred. Initially, a White House security adviser, John Brennan stated that, "He (Osama) was engaged in a firefight of those that entered the area of the house he was in." This left a strong impression that Osama was armed with a gun. However the story quickly changed, as the New York Times had an article in which administration said only two days after what Brennan said that the only shots fired were from the very beginning of the assault, and were not by Bin Laden but rather by his trusted courier, and then they were never fired upon. This is a dramatic change in the official account, and a stunning contradiction. It is only logical that top officials would have the same story if this assassination actually occurred. [4] yet there were more contradictions in the official account. Brennan also told reporters that "...there was a family at the compound and there was a female who was in fact in the line of fire that was reportedly used as a shield to shield Bin Laden from incoming fire." However the president's spokesman later contradicted the account by reporting that, "...In the room with Bin Laden, a woman, rather Bin Laden's wife, rushed a U.S assaulter and was shot in the leg and was not killed." Even on the state of the compound the report contradicted itself, defense officials told reporters on Monday that his facility was worth 1 million USD, however local estimates later said that the facility was worth only 250,000 USD, once again a stark contradiction in the official account. [4] It seems only fair to assume that if this actually happened, top officials would have some consensus on the events that actually transpired. The last evidence I'll present in this round, if evidence that Osama Bin Laden was in fact dead before the U.S attack in 2011. A Fox News article [5] citing an article by the Pakistan Observer, reported '...he died a peaceful death due to an untreated health complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a TALIBAN LEADER WHO ALLEGEDLY ATTENDED THE FUNERAL OF THE AL QAEDA LEADER." This is extremely important to my case, it was con after all who stated ISIS was a group who is in the know, I'm sure they could agree that this applies to the Taliban and Al Qaeda as well. These are reports of people attending Osama's funeral in 2001, and also importantly, this report from December 2001 by Fox News was conducted before this alleged assassination in 2011. To support this article, we must note it was widely known that Bin Laden suffered from serious health issues. Steve Pieczenik, a doctor and award winning Harvard medical school luminary, states that 'Osama Bin Laden died in 2001, not because special forces has killed him, but because I as a physician has known that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence roster that he had marfan syndrome." It was well known that Bin Laden was suffering from serious health problems in 2001. [6] And the people that say Bin Laden died in 2001, The Taliban, is a terrorist organization just like ISIS, which is a group that con claims is in the know. 1. http://www.cbsnews.com... 2. http://www.salon.com... 3. http://www.smh.com.au... 4. http://www.theguardian.com... 5. http://www.foxnews.com... 6. http://www.infowars.com...