Most Christian denominations are Psuedo christian, or Athiestic Christian churches

Going to try and keep my responses short. Our main difference is that you believe that many churches are fake because they do not openly perform miracles, and because they are divided. I believe that miracles are by no means a prerequisite for being a Christian, and that these divisions, while unfortunate, are A. Necessary and B. Division does not mean that they are not Christian. "Key words from the versus originally stated from the verses I provided where you said it only spoke of the Holy Spirit and 0% relativity. If you can't comprehend the relationship, perhaps you should have inquired in the comment section if you had time." Sorry, but I actually have no idea what this means. "Who do you think controls the majority of Denominations/Churches and those who claim to be Christians? It sure (IS NOT) can only be the HOLY SPIRIT." I think people led by the Holy Spirit "control" most denominations. Most definitely, some do not fully understand the Holy Spirit's guidance. That does not make them pseudo-Christian. That just makes them slightly wrong --- and God accepts slight errors in doctrine, because He knows that sin has corrupted us and makes us imperfect. "If mankind was not into brick and mortar buildings being built more and more, larger and larger looking for governmental subsidies and tax-breaks for employees and everyone/everything else, do you still truth be told believe churches would be built as much as they are today? If that is not for corporation business greed" The average church (in America) has 89 adult members. Less than 2% have over 1,000 members. (http://careynieuwhof.com...) "If you say the answer is not for business in today's church, let's take even a non-christian like hindu, muslim or other faith you think they don't focus on the business requirement aspects first the same time?" In order to reach more people (and to support the lives of church staff) churches need money. And the average member of the clergy makes $45,500, and only pastors of megachurches (2,000+ members, less than 2% of churches) make $100,000 (http://work.chron.com...). "Who was Jesus Christ's business administrator or treasurer" Judas (John 13:29) "or does this not imply that when one church gets so big it must divide itself?" Unsure how Judas being the treasurer implies that big churches should divide themselves. "Why not just have home-churches, where it is more personal more welcoming, more sincere? Is this or is this not what Christ's ministry is about?" That would be awesome, and when it can be done, it should be done. I myself have attended 2 in home churches in Bulgaria. However, if the average church has 90ish members, who will organize home-churches so that all may attend? Let's say 20 people can comfortably fit into 1 home church. The 90 members would have to split into 3-5 home churches, and each church would need someone willing to lead the rest in studying the Bible, leading worship, etc. "Granted, it is nice to have a specific public place of worship and acknowledgement, but for this to take place is someone trying to get acknowledgement for what reason? I would dare say that depending on the type of subsidies received, and the type of services offered or not offered it could very well implicate an implied answer." One can note from the salaries I provided earlier that anyone trying to make money should not go into ministry, with very few exceptions. Also, it is repeatedly mentioned in Acts that the believers met in the temple courts. After the Pentecost, 3,000 believers were added to their number. That actually fits the modern-day definition of a megachurch. "The first time I started to question was approximately 7-8th grade of middle school. Things didn't add up myself. I had a spiritual encounter with a demon from a Southern Baptist Denominational teaching with another adult counselor who just frankly told me, "It's just your imagination playing tricks on you, its not real." That is unfortunate. "By simply implying LUCY and infant baptism indicates there is a portion of uncertainty for your belief and statement of faith to practice, leading me to understand that you listen to the word of mankind who have paper degrees on biblical teaching versus listening to only the HOLY SPIRIT for GUIDANCE, I will let the Holy Spirit dictate how or why an infant should be baptized by scriptural references HE leads to be discovered and understood by HIS timing, not mine." Okay. Okay. *calms down*. I never said I support infant baptism. In fact, I stated that I do not support it. It was an analogy to show that expressing a denomination is a quick way to determine if your beliefs line up with someone else's. And, Can not the Holy Spirit guide me through the teachings of other people, people who are extremely intelligent? "explain how churches are not able to be overcome by SATAN and his evil strategies" The debate topic says most churches. I repeat, Most churches. Some churches may be overcome by evil. Not most. "when they run into someone contrary they would openly explain their differences and why" My point was that you would not know if you ran into someone contrary, unless you fully outlined every detail of your belief every time you met a different person, which is what a denomination does. "Every subject is black and white for those who seek and BELIEVE in HIS NAME. Why? Because HE will make discernment and understanding for such questions, problems and unknown certainties." Has God answered all your questions, about every aspect of life? "I believe I have addressed this either above or in the comments." Don't think you did. "If churches are not practicing perform such activities like laying of hands it implies once saved, there's no more spirit or demon in a Christian. (to me at least)" No, it implies that the church does not practice the laying of hands, or does not have someone gifted with healing. Also, nearly every Christian practices praying for healing. In other words, asking God to heal, which is what many of the people Jesus healed did. "I would question, (myself included) if I am not daily seeking HIM out, I may fall out of HIS grace (perhaps I am too legalistic) and until I truly repent seeking HIM I am borderline pseudo/atheistic due to the analogy plain that replace HIM with something else at that exact moment of my life for HIM to use me." Unsure how this relates to the experiences I've had where I have felt the Holy Spirit guiding me to pray for someone. "How does one not build up without tearing down and seeking to understand why the problems are occurring? Jesus built up all and didn't call anyone fruitless name-calling and finger-pointing did he? Oh, wait he did.. I forgot did you forget too?" Instead of calling most Christians atheists or fakers, you could instead say, "More churches should practice the gifts of the Spirit." Jesus knew how to change people's hearts. He did not go around saying, "Most Jews are fakers." He told the Pharisee's specifically that they were a brood of vipers. Most Jews were not Pharisees. If you had opened the debate with, "Many leaders of megachurches are false Christians" then we would not be having this debate. But you didn't say that. This debate has been edifying for me, and it is good that I have explored the scriptures more. However, I feel like I have restated most of my argument multiple times, and I don't have an interest to continue doing so. If you wish to say more, that is fine. I will simply reply next round with "finish". Thank you for the debate.