how wrong you are

1st) Why not try addressing the FACTS for once.... oh wait you have finally admitted to being a liberal... facts and you folks are seldom if ever seen together... Apparently you do not dispute or are unable to refute any of the facts that I have posted. Just mindless liberal diatribe. * All you did was spout hogwash..."IF", the so called "Majority" of people, "most" of the world.... eh? LOL sadly pedantic and totally devoid of facts. Nothing more than your personal opinion. * Apparently you feel that the majority o f the world are mindless lemming idiots. * At one point in our history, how many nations (in your words "Most level headed) people thought that slavery was a grand idea... they were wrong then, just as you are now. * Let's look at just one of your erroneous claims, shall we? A nation better off because of banning guns.?.?.? * Australia banned most firearms from the populace in 2002. http://www.ncpa.org... "In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent. "Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent. "Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent. * Imagine that... but the sad fact is, the folks in the U.K. don't have to imagine... they live it every day. * Simple FACT: When seconds count, the police are only minutes away. * Educate yourself sport. Facts are never a bad thing.... go look for yourself * 2nd) Do you even know what a so called "Assault Rifle" is? Do you know that the "look" of the firearm is totally irrelevant to the caliber or type of round it may fire? * An "Assault rifle" has select fire capabilities... which you would need a class 3 license to legally acquire. Most folks (I cite you) are woefully unformed about firearms and just follow the herd. * 3rd) Imagine if the liberal media actually reported on cases where the LEGALLY ARMED CITIZEN saved a life or stopped a crime. * I am betting that in your myopic world view that has never occurred. * 4th) Abusive leaders throughout history spoke much like you... the Need to disarm the populace "For their own good" (Chavez, Hitler, Castro.....etc.) and just look how well that works for most folks in those countries. * Why is it that every time you folks try to do something "to us, "For our own good" it never works and ends up being just another form of control? * Bloomberg ring a bell? The soda pop Gestapo... * Let us take a look at certain facts shall we? * The truth is, most mass shootings in the US have taken place where citizens are not allowed to carry their own firearms. * In essence, the victims are sitting ducks and the armed gunmen know it. * How many THOUSANDS of gun control laws are already on the books? Hell, we even have a President and an Attorney General supplying fully automatic assault weapons to the Mexican drug cartels... yet you folks don't seem overly concerned about that... imagine my shock at your hypocrisy. * As far as armed Police in schools: * A recent Gallup poll finds more than half (53%) of Americans view increased police presence at schools as a very effective way to prevent mass shootings at schools. http://www.politico.com... * Now...a real culprit... * According to liberals, the movie industry has no fault in any of the shootings that have occurred... * BUT...When we have a mass murderer, dressed up like the Joker, gun down innocent moviegoers in Aurora, Colorado; it"s difficult to dispute the influence of the entertainment industry on the mindset of a killer. * Wanna bet that "most of the world" and the "Majority of clear headed individuals will agree? * Mental health advocates fight against involuntary commitment under the liberty clause of the Fifth Amendment. * The "play makers" fight for their artistic expression of free speech under the First Amendment. (Oddly enough, when folks lose their right to bear arms, they quite rapidly also loose their right to free speech.... Castro ring a bell?) * Gun owners fight for the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment. * Along with these precious American rights, come responsibilities. Responsibilities that folks like you seek to suborn and/or remove. * The bottom line is simple, freedom has risks... The very freedom to disagree has risks... but without those risks, there is no freedom.