Star Wars VII - The Force Awakens is a bad movie

In this instance, however, I wish to thank the readers for stomaching such a childish and misinformed temper tantrum; I struggle to muster up the ability to even legitimize it as a “response. ” Let me begin by informing all readers where exactly Pro is coming from, and while every word in this “response” is a childish lie. About 2 or so days ago before typing this sentence, I voted on Pro’s only other debate, “JJ Abrams is a bad director”: . http://www.debate.org... My vote was completely legitimate, and I have yet to have been told otherwise. There is nothing the TOS that prevents members from voting on an opponent’s debate while they are also engaged in another debate with said person. I have the complete right to make that vote, and I exercised said right. That being said, if Pro contacted me ever, and sent a message wishing for my vote to be removed, I would have obliged; I’m not impossible to work with. Instead, Pro sent me a message with the subject, “idiot” and, to paraphrase, said “Why would you defend your ‘gay’ pal [imabench]? I will block you. Idiot. ” I issued no response, as I typically don’t entertain such harassing messages. Now, let’s look at Pro’s individual claims about me. Contentions: 1. “I don't know where is the option to delete this debate but I wish to delete it. I don't want to debate anymore. ” a. I will oppose any and all efforts to delete this debate; debates are deleted for a multitude of reasons, but one side not liking the outcome is typically seen as invalid. b. Not wanting to debate anymore in response to one’s valid vote and arguments is childish and melodramatic. There is no rational basis behind this desire. 2. “My opponent has cowardly ganged up with another debates. org buddy to bully me and harass me, it's not fair. 2 vs 1? ” a. Pro’s statement here is referring to the user, “imabench. ” I have had zero correspondence with the user imabench for the 3 or so years I’ve been on this website. I talked with him once in fourms, where he insulted me (. http://www.debate.org...) and I voted for his Vice Presidency in the DDO elections when he ran with the user Mikal. That’s the most I’ve ever engaged with this user; I have never conspired to “gang up” with him to attack new users. b. Pro’s response paints him like a victim, when his behavior has made him anything but. Just later in the same paragraph Pro states this, he proceeds to call imabench and myself, “low-life scumbags, thugs, [and] weasels. ” How is what I did an example of bullying but this isn’t? c. Not to boast, but I’ve won 19 debates without help from any user on this site; why would this debate with Pro be any different? 3. “They don't give arguments based on reason, as they know I'm right. They give arguments based on how much they like each other and how much they back up each others backs, in a coward way. ” a. If Pro’s arguments were ever really truth, it would be quite the daunting challenge for me to argue against this resolution, correct? Every argument I’ve extended here is based upon reason, and Pro has the BOP to show otherwise. Instead, he decided to post a mere whine about how I was unfair to him. If Pro truly was “right,” then this matter wouldn’t even exist. b. The second sentence of this point has no rational basis in any known reality. Honestly, is this a serious post? Where did I ever do this? Where did imabench ever do this? Where, in any of my correspondence with Pro did I ever do this? There only place I could entertain this occurring is with my vote, but I put forth a logical vote with which most other users would reach the same conclusion. 4. “Also, they insult me all the time, directly and beating around the bush, like low-life scumbags, thugs, weasels. ” a. I could probably write a book about the sheer amount of irony displayed in this one sentence right here. b. When have I ever insulted Pro? Was it in the message where he called me an idiot and I didn’t respond? Was it in my vote, where all I talked about was the Abrams debate? Was it in this debate, where all I talked about was Star Wars? Honestly, I want to know. 5. “I never want to talk to both of them again and have already blocked them on here. I only wish to talk to decent human beings. ” a. There is nothing but an appeal to emotion here; almost nothing to which a response is worthwhile. b. How is anything I’ve done justified calling me an indecent human being? This is an attack upon my entire existence, and it’s seems melodramatic and irrational. I’m sensing a motif here. Conclusion: Pro has conceded the entire debate, and I’m fully deserving of all 7 points being awarded to me. All Pro did was argue irrationally, become offended when I and other users noted that, sent me a harassing message, posted a childish temper tantrum, and expected to be considered a victim. I don’t want to chase new users off of the site, but I want strong debaters to stay. The resolution stands negated.