Noahs ark never happened.

'This point is not really proving anything - Even evolutionists don't have much of an answer to how the races came about. Although this is still a mystery for both sides, I find it much harder to explain how some apes evolved to be white people and others african americans:). ' Well actually why do you find it hard ?Evolutionists do know how races came about , adaptation , All humans come from Africa, so humans at one point were entirely black skinned. All races outside of Africa are just subsets of that original African population. 'Evolutionists also agree that event like this happened to shape our world but they do not believe that it was the flood. (1)' That is not true the link you gave me is to a pro-creation website that doesn't contain any statistics also on your argument , evidence doesn't support your point of view at all - Mount Everest, like the rest of the Himalayas, rose from the floor of the ancient Tethys Sea. The range was created when the Eurasian continental plate collided with the Indian subcontinental plate about 30 to 50 million years ago. http://www.italysoft.com...;. 'There isn't any support for this so I don't know what you're talking about. But, according to evolution,we all came from a common ancestor so wouldn't these same rules apply in an even greater sense if this were true?' I don't understand your point either what biologists refer to as a common ancestor. This apelike ancestor, which probably lived 5 to 11 million years ago in Africa, gave rise to two distinct lineages, one resulting in hominids -- humanlike species -- and the other resulting in the great ape species living today. Or, to use a family tree analogy, the common ancestor occupied a trunk, which then divided into two branches. Hominids developed along one branch, while the great ape species developed along another branch. http://science.howstuffworks.com... argument i used was if there was two animals of each kind they will have babies after leaving the ark right? and than their babies would have to mate with each other , there is not enough genetic diversity for a species to form 'Without going into the details of genetics, it can be stated that every inherited trait, however small, is coded for by one or more genes, and each gene locus may have a substantial number of variants (alleles), which accounts for the great variety observed in a given population. Any specific individual, however, has at most only two alleles per locus—one from each parent. As James C. King writes: There is good evidence for concluding that every message coded in the DNA exists in any sizeable population in numerous versions, forming a spectrum grading from grossly defective alleles—such as the one for albinism—at one end, through the slightly deviant, to the normal at the other end. And the normal is probably not a single version of the message but a collection of slightly different alleles. (p. 55) Hence, for a trait such as human pigmentation, "we can visualize not merely a few dozen interacting loci but an array of perhaps a dozen or so alleles at each locus" (p. 60). From this we can see that the original canine baramin in Eden would have needed a fantastic set of giant chromosomes with alleles for every trait that would someday be manifest in coyotes, wolves, foxes, jackals, dingos, fennecs, and the myriad of minute variations in hair color (twenty-four genes at nine loci), height, face shape, and so forth that are seen in the domestic dog (cf. Hutt). So, too, for the feline kind, within which creationists Byron Nelson (p. 157) and Alfred Rehwinkel (p. 70) both place lions, tigers, leopards, and ocelots as well as housecats. Similar giant chromosomes would be required for the bovine kind, equine kind, and so on.' -http://ncse.com... . 'I have one major point: Use of words. In the Bible, it says to take Kinds of animals, not species. Above, you said that there was only a few thousand "kinds" of animals on the ark (Which is correct). However, you then asked how the ark could fit the 15 million "species".' you misunderstood me there was a few thousand kids of animals of ark right? and now there are million of spcies alive today? how is that massive change possibly in 4 thousand years ? enlighten me ? about 10 new species would have to come alive every day for it to reach 15 million in 4 thousand years .'Noah got an olive branch with leaves before they left the ark which meant that an olive tree was alive and growing somewhere. Also, as seen by modern floods, massive sheets of floating vegetation could have supplied food. ' a seed ? after a year underwater? also not a lot of animals feed off olives you know . 'It is true that these animals would require a lot of food. There are a few things to keep in mind. First, the animals on the ark were juvenile and therefore didn't require the amount of food of a full grow animal does.' Juvenile? even if they started their migration the ark as juvenile by the time they arrived at the ark they would be adults .