BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Vaccine are Safe and Effective

People assume that vaccines are safe just because doctors recommend them, but it's not true. Vaccines have been portrayed as humanity's savior from diseases like Polio when they really weren't. Polio was already on the decline before the vaccine. Every year we are recommended to get the flu vaccine, but the flu shot is unnecessary and unsafe to get. Vaccines are suppose to stimulate the reaction of a real virus, but the way this is artificially done is dangerous. Babies should avoid as much immune stimulation as they can. One study done showed that Immune molecules in the brain during neural development is damaging and can cause autism. So why are babies getting so many vaccinations? [1] Also the amount of toxic substances in vaccines is way more than the amount that anyone should get at one time. Premature neonates should not receive more than 4 to 5 micrograms of aluminum per kilogram of body weight. An 8 pound healthy baby = max of 18.16mcg of aluminum. The Hep B vaccine has 250 micrograms. [2] We are told that vaccines don't cause any other problems, but In a study of 11,000 children the chances of getting asthma were cut in half if vaccinations were delayed. [3] After inoculation for that zostavax a person has a large chance of testing positive for the varicella zoster virus. Because of this, vaccinated individuals have the potential to spread the disease. [4] Vaccines are filled with toxic ingredients, and deserve another critical look by parents. Do what's best for your child and don't give them all their vaccines. [5] [1]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... [2]http://www.accessdata.fda.gov... http://www.askdrsears.com... [3]http://www.dailymail.co.uk... [4]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... http://newstarget.com... [5]https://www.cdc.gov...
Valentino Shoes place

Yes. Current reports vindicated this, but statistics show otherwise. Though statistically I don't think that the median is actually representative of the mean. Quid pro quo I suppose. I know Tim, but probably not the same Tim. He prefers a high end trail runner. One that matches his outgoing personality. Sally has the photographic interest but is still in love with non digital technology. She and Tim enjoy weekend recreation and share an appreciation for the trail runner. Nonetheless, I would suggest that deployment and efficiency are by no means stymied and I would also suggest that there is definitely a correlation between the mid-sole cushioning and the balance in form and function. Though to assume a subtlety of seasoning, I think is an overreaction . The duration of the recreation event is justifiable and the proclivity of the sock fabric is a more reasonable indicator. Therefore your reference to herbs and seasoning is not wholly justifiable under the presumed circumstances. Your Tim, My Tim, Sally and Mark Gorkin all display a tendency for uncertainty. The Tim's both seem to cross reference form and function, whereas Sally, on the other hand is comfortable in both width and performance but lacks confidence in framing techniques. Mark Gorkin however always appears psychologically preoccupied with his apparent association with the green pickle. With regard to investment in technological improvements. Would it not be more prudent to take a sideways look at competition, in both sock technology and absorption management systems. To miss a trick now at this critical time, might result in a diminishment of current performance. But more importantly, as Mark Gherkin would undoubtedly conclude, time factors are not necessarily indicative of either, shutter speed or depth of focus.
Valentino Shoes place

These are a few things you should look at before you buy your shoes. People I played with, friends of mine, actually marked the cards to give themselves a little edge. "He walks around and says he can't stand me. A friend suggested Weight Watchers, and Tim went with it. Don't forget to grab some table shots too. The Push AF activates the manualfocus mode and the autofocus works swiftly when Instant AF is enabled. Once you have the totals fixed, try to find a way to make it work. For many fellas and boys, belts are not [b][url=http://www.valentinooutletvip.com...]Valentino Shoes[/url][/b] necessarily considered a fashion equipment, as much as these are a way to have pants in place; but, identical doesn actually diamond ring true for ladies. It has become an indispensable part of our life. Taps can be added to any type of character shoe or sturdy style of shoe. "The four sources of stress during the holidays are fantasies, family, food and finances," says Mark Gorkin, a psychotherapist and public speaker who goes by the moniker "Stress Doc." "The temptation is to want it all," he says. The elastic design and foam cushioning offer terrific comfort and shock absorption. Season the surface of the duxelles with salt and pepper and sprinkle with fresh thyme leaves. Be it gown, shoes, utility belt, handbag, rubber gloves, wallets . In this process, we [b][url=http://www.valentinooutletvip.com...]Valentino Shoes Sale[/url][/b] tend to ignore foot hygiene, making way for dirty, smelly feet. Olivea hello are you are let's go and I'm. New Balance turned to HP blade servers and technology solutions to maximize its information technology investment and achieve greater ease of management, deployment and efficiency in its data center, the company reports.
Jesus Created Antichrist.

OH good I get to say more: I put my rebuttal as a comment-sorry, new to this area. I'll learn. Yes God created me, you pharaohs, Satan and all things. They were created by Him and for Him all things were created. They are designed to accomplish divine purposes in life. So you under the impression that God doesn't exist simply because some of His creation decide to act a fool? Where is the Logic in That? God created us with free wills so that unlike the animals, we would not just walk around mindlessly, functioning completely by instinct, and unable to fellowship with him. Angels also given free wills, but were created as servants of the most high that is their function. We on the other hand were created for a higher purpose- His children, to share in His creation, and as such be able to communicate and fellowship with Him freely and on a level that NO OTHER created creature was capable of doing. The fact that some angels rebelled isn't the point is it? I mean WE REBEL yeah?. The point is we are ALL creations of God. Because of the fall of man through Adam, we are under condemnation- another words we MUST DIE because of our sin- you know the wages of sin stuff! Well God has made it possible in His Grace and Love of his creation for those WHO ARE WILLING to be reconciled to Him. Jesus PAID the debt you and I could not pay. He took upon himself all the acts of sinful man so that whomsoever will believe on him His blood covers ALL sins you will commit past present and future. He becomes YOUR sacrificial Lamb, and in return a Holy God, grants or (imputes) to YOU Christ righteousness, so that you become blameless. As I have already shown you in the comments I made earlier, you DO LIVE like a christian, you just suppress the truth. All nonbelievers LIVE contrary to what they profess. YOU CANNOT CLAIM science, heck not even the scientist can claim science UNLESS they are believers. cause in order for them to claim it they must acknowledge the physical and natural order of God's universe. The indwelling knowledge of right and wrong that He put within His creation. That's that feeling you get when you consider doing something you KNOW IS WRONG. You know the little devil on your left shoulder and the Angel on your Right? When you STOP living like you really believe everything IS RANDOM, chaotic, no right or wrong, then we'll debate. Let me just say that God has made away for YOU to be forgiven, for YOU to be saved. Come closer man and SEE that God IS GOOD! So to the point God created the Antichrist -------- yeah He Did, but unlike the Antichrist-YOU STILL HAVE HOPE. Don't blow it man, Please!
Jesus Created Antichrist.

tsh, you simply do not understand! YOU HAVE NO POINTS. You haven't HAD a POINT since we started! You haven't provided a SINGLE iota of evidentiary support for ANY of your statements. All I've heard is your imagination ..... UNSUPPORTED imagination. So give me some indication or inkling that you EVEN KNOW what your talking ABOUT! What are you basing your points ON! Reiterating YOUR NON SUPPORTED,UNSUBSTANTIATED,UNFOUNDED points: 1. Jesus' act of sacrifice included sacrificing his time on earth for the bigger picture. ??????? where DID you get this notion? 2. Jesus' millennial inaction has allowed for the unholy spirit of the Antichrist to fester and evolve. ????? Evidence that supports this contention? again outside your imagination please. 3. Jesus putting on a preemptive act of how to be the Antichrist is a self-fulfilling prophecy.???? demonstrates a clear LACK of any truths whatsoever! again no supportive evidence. 4. Christians are helping out their misguided messiah. ?????? WOW you really haven't a clue of what your talking about. Christ act of sacrifice WAS necessary to RESTORE the children of God to Himself. Matthew says : Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. you make it sound like He came here to walk about for perpetuity with sinful man. not even close- where is your evidence outside opinion, you have not established credibility in any of your points that exist outside your imagination. The Antichrist fester and evolve? where do you get that from. Satan needs no festering he hates with a intensity no mortal understands, and his sole purpose for you and any loved by God is to destroy them, keep them from turning to God and being redeemed. he wants you to suffer and die, and here's the part that really is gonna tweak your melon, YOU ALREADY BELONG TO HIM. Matthew 12:30 clearly states "Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters. Jesus putting on a per-emptive act? are you for real? Listen debating is all well and good, but either put up REAL EVIDENCE in support of your alleged POINTS or in this case hallucinations or stop clouding up the boards with unsubstantiated, unsupported, unfounded rhetoric.
Jesus Created Antichrist.

It seems the only viable argument my opponent made is by objecting to the culpability being cast on blameless Jesus. I assure you, this would create a "vacuum", absorbing all the responsibility that "belongs" to God the Father, rendering all sin meaningless in an infinity of irrelevance. It worked for sin and mankind. The Antichrist being the culminating sin of Christians over 2000 years of incompetence as well as God's overall permission of such an atrocity. Reiterating my points: 1. Jesus' act of sacrifice included sacrificing his time on earth for the bigger picture. 2. Jesus' millennial inaction has allowed for the unholy spirit of the Antichrist to fester and evolve. 3. Jesus putting on a preemptive act of how to be the Antichrist is a self-fulfilling prophecy. 4. Christians are helping out their misguided messiah. For future reference, please address everything I say. Feedback is why I do this.
Jesus Created Antichrist.

Aside from the unnecessary and unoriginal preaching, I am grateful for there to be an opponent to this peculiar claim. Assuming I wish to even address my opponent's approach and humor his assumption that I am unaware of what he was attempting to say, I did not learn anything from his rebuttal, especially anything relevant to my argument. Going from there, refuting his off topic sermon presents a nice opportunity to drive home the point that I am an unrepentant heretic and there is futility in trying to reconvert me. I still identify as a Christian, since I am still willing and capable of proclaiming Jesus Christ as the messiah. As for continuing the debate, my fourth contention would seem improvised and based solely on the reaction to my opponent. Christians are creating the Antichrist as well. Like the ancient Hebrews building for the Egyptians, Christians are constructing the Antichrist's empire before he even appears and can steal it from them. Scandals, corruption, inaction, these are all rationales the Antichrist can utilize to turn the world completely against the Christians and Jesus. This ties into my second contention as well. Why would God allow this? As if this were inconsistent with his tactics and behavioral history. People will blame God for such an evil man to be in charge of the world, but if God gets ahead of the blame game and turns it on its head, eradicating the blame through Jesus, infinitely enhancing Jesus' blameless nature and silencing embittered rebels. According to River Hills, making things worse is an opportunity to demonstrate God's justice, power and grace. http://www.riverhillsonline.org... Allowing the ultimate bad guy to take over the world demonstrates objective fairness towards evil to let it takes its best potshot at good and fail. Unable to complain about an overpowered arbiter of good who is the ironic dictator for providing free will, evil slithers back to hell for regrouping time and again. Why be fair to evil? Good is self-sacrificial and willing to undertake inconveniences to prove how good it really is. What does this have to do with Jesus creating Antichrist? Jesus (knowingly?) let God do this subtle procedure to establish the endgame 2000 years early. This should be why Christians praise God for the preemptively finished work on the cross.
State Intervention Hinders Economic Growth

I accept, but I'd first like to properly illustrate the parameters of the debate with you, just to clarify due to the relative vagueness of the concepts you put forward. By 'a free market approach', do you mean the policies of Reagan and Thatcher, or the mythical realm of Austrian Economics and Objectivism? The term 'state intervention' is a little vague too. It could mean anything from nationalising entire industries to the most basic of taxation and services. Please be more precise I don't think GDP growth is a good enough figure to measure an impact on an economy, so I think we should take into account income inequality, poverty rates, median incomes, crime rates, quality of healthcare, wage growth, etc.; it creates a far more balanced picture of the economy and society, both of which are interchangable. I appreciate there's something of a transatlantic lexical and cultural divide between us, so if we could agree on terms, it would help the debate to run smoothly. Could you devote a few sentences at the beginning of R2 so we're perfectly clear as to what we mean by the various terms and parameters?
Humans should be vegetarians.

I'll be arguing that the opponent's claim that "humans should become vegetarian" is not adequately supported and cannot be upheld. I'll be stating now the assumption that "vegetarian" refers to a person who doesn't eat animal meat. I'll furthermore clarify that the word "should" implies a moral, ethical and/or pragmatic desirability factor. As such, he is making an objective claim and possesses the Burden of Proof. I look forward to opening arguments.
Humans should be vegetarians.

Remaining Round 4 Sources[4] http://michaelbluejay.com...[5] http://www.onegreenplanet.org...My opponent forfeit their previous round, therefore my evidence stands unrebut. In conclusion, humans should become vegetarian and expel the killing of farm animals because it would promote kindness and compassion. Humans have arrived at the point in which meat isn't required in order to survive, and poorly preapred meat can result in obesity and high blood cholestoral. Furthermore, raw meat can cause sickness for humans, whereas it doesn't cause as much sickness for omnivores and carnivores. Lastly, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence to prove that livestock causes pollution, deforestation, and excessive land use.I enjoyed this debate despite my opponent's forfeit. Thank you to all viewers and voters of this intriguing discussion!
Baseball is the hardest sport!

Since failing is such a huge part of baseball it is very hard on you mentally. When you are up to bat no one can help you and everyone is watching you. However in football if you catch the ball everyone is helping you. If you make a bad catch in football you can just kind of stay on the sideline and have no one notice you and still not look bad. Also while in the defensive position in baseball every player has multiple plays going through his mind depending on where he is playing. Hitting a fastball is just one pitch. Trying to hit that, a curveball, fork, slider, a kunckle, etc. while not knowing what pitch he is going to throw is the biggest things in sports to feat. Batters usually try to judge what kind of pitch is being thrown by location of the arm, however, some pitchers have a very small variation is arm location. Another difficulty is stealing, both for the runner and the defense. An average MLB baseball player with a twelve foot lead-off can get to second in 3.5 seconds. The catcher has to get rid of the ball in .9 seconds to beat the runner off a 90mph. pitch. If all goes right he will only beat the runner by .25 seconds. The "jump" for the runner is also hard. If the runner starts .05 seconds to early he could get picked off, .05 seconds to late and he could lose up to 2 feet. And for the catcher it comes down to accuracy. For every foot the 2nd baseman has to move his glove to apply the tag the runner gains 2 feet! From the catchers 128' away from second base means his margin of error is only 1 degree. That is in no way shape or form easy. In football you see all the time a bad throw, a bad catch, QB getting sacked, Gaining a couple feet or even losing a couple feet, not because its hard because they are not as skilled.
Baseball is the hardest sport!

"Due to the difficulty of this, failing 7 out of 10 times is still good enough to land you in the pros." I do not really get this argument. This seems to strenghten my argument. All this proves is that in baseball you could make more mistakes and still be a pro. "You need good eyesight, good concentration, years of practice, excellent reaction, etc. a batter needs it all." You don't think you need that in football? You need these even more. Quarterback: he needs to see the entire field and see if anyone is going to tackle him which proves that he needs good eyesight and excellent reaction. Surely this does not occur over night. It takes a lot of work and concentration to throw a ball on an 100 yard field and throw it accuratlely and quickly before somebody intercepts it and it doesn't happen overnight. blockers: need to see incoming tacklers and react quickly to stop them. This takes tons of concentration considering how fast the tacklers move. This also takes years of practice to master. "Once a 90 mph. fastball is released there is only 400 milliseconds until impact. The first 100 milliseconds are needed for the batters eyes to see the ball and send an image to the brain. Another 75 milliseconds are needed for the brain to determine speed and location of the pitch and another 50 more to decide where to swing the bat. With only 165 milliseconds remaining, the brain signals the swing to begin. If it's as little as 7 milliseconds to early or to late, the ball will sail foul after contact. A two pound bat swinging at 80 mph. can strike the ball with up to nine hp. Also the batter is trying to get the ball to hit the "sweet spot" which just adds to the difficulty." Obviously this is hard. But if you think about it, how often does one batter go to bat during the game? There are like what 20 batters. And the other half of the game, one is fielding so he is not experiencing this every second. Football on the other hand, every play requires this quick thinking that I have already mentioned. Also, in baseball, a good portion of the game one is sitting in the dugout watching the game or drinking water or just practicing. Comepare football legend Jerry Rice to Mickey Mantle. Jerry Rice would be on the field nearly the whole game running on an 100 yard field with all his speed to make very difficult catches. Mickey Mantle does experience batting but how often? How much of a break does he get in between each time he bats? Football is just more active. If you were asked to play in a MLB game or NFL game I think you would choose MLB game not just because baseball is your favorite sport because you do not want to kill yourself getting tackled by one of the strongest men.
Baseball is the hardest sport!

First of all just trying to tell a person that you have to hit a round ball with a round bat squarely already sounds hard. Due to the difficulty of this, failing 7 out of 10 times is still good enough to land you in the pros. I don't think if you fail catching a football 7 out of 10 times will get you in the NFL. Or making an accurate throw only 3 out of 10 times will either. You need good eyesight, good concentration, years of practice, excellent reaction, etc. a batter needs it all. Going up to bat with a wooden stick a batter has less than a 1/4 of a second to: see the pitch, judge its speed and location, decide what to do, and then swing. Once a 90 mph. fastball is released there is only 400 milliseconds until impact. The first 100 milliseconds are needed for the batters eyes to see the ball and send an image to the brain. Another 75 milliseconds are needed for the brain to determine speed and location of the pitch and another 50 more to decide where to swing the bat. With only 165 milliseconds remaining, the brain signals the swing to begin. If it's as little as 7 milliseconds to early or to late, the ball will sail foul after contact. A two pound bat swinging at 80 mph. can strike the ball with up to nine hp. Also the batter is trying to get the ball to hit the "sweet spot" which just adds to the difficulty.
Baseball is the hardest sport!

Good luck to my opponent! I will be arguing that football is without a doubt the hardest sport. To begin, football requires a ton of fitness; a lot more than baseball. If you just look at how much stronger football players are than baseball players, it proves how strong you need to be to become a football player. As for baseball, the hardest part is technique and this is really the only argument I think pro can make. It is definite that it is very hard to hit a 90 mph baseball and takes years to master. But if you think about the technique a quarter back needs to have about how to throw a football really far, sometimes as far as 90 yards. Mastering this takes strength and technique. The quarterback also needs to have eyes like a hawk to see everyone on the 100-yard field. The quarterback also does not have that much time to throw as he must throw it before anyone tackles him. The QB could also run which takes speed and agility to not get tackled And not just the quarterback, but also the receivers. It takes a lot of speed to catch the ball because the quarterback never throws the ball directly to the receiver. The blockers: I bet the weakest blockers are probably stronger than the strongest baseball player because blockers need to stop the quarterback from getting tackled. And the tacklers, they have to tackle people who are very often stronger than them. Also, do you see baseball players wearing as much protective equipment as football players. Even though football players are much strong they need ten times more protective equipment with baseball players. Even with this equipment there has been so many tough injuries, injuries that cannot even compare to the injuries of baseball. Also, football is just a much more dirtier sports. The New Orleans saints last year were caught intentionally injuring a player. http://www.huffingtonpost.com... I will stop for now and wait for my oppoent's response.