A leftist Anarchist society would be functional

If you want to talk about Natural Selection, you cannot put Capitalism in the same sentence.A dyed-in-the-wool conservative friend recently suggested that I was hypocritical in being in support of the "Occupy Movement" while suggesting that most companies don't like to hire visibly unhealthy workers (yes, including those with unhealthy body mass indexes), because of a natural human tendency that evolved in our species to marginalize individuals who cannot actively benefit 'the tribe'. His point is that capitalism seems to be the natural outcome of natural selection, survival of the fittest, as is my point about evolution-affected decision-making bias in hiring employees. I believe that capitalism is not at all the product of NATURAL selection, it is the product of SOCIAL selection and the result of humans having far too much time on their hands over the past 10,000 years. In just 5-10% of our species' existence, we've moved from 190,000 years of living in the natural nomadic, hunter/gatherer, tribal state our genes/instincts most naturally were designed to cope with, to being sedentary, urbanized and living in isolated nuclear families. We no longer live in the shared environment of a tribal village, like these un-contacted cousins of ours photographed in Brazil a couple of months ago: ...............Living in a society forces us to modify our naturally 'greedy' selfish interests for the benefit of our shared genes. Our 'unnatural' modern societies have long glorified what are actually anti-social tendencies to accumulate personal wealth at the expense of the health of the tribe. Anathema to most 'capitalists' today, yet clearly the most natural state for human beings to survive best in the setting we evolved to live in. From the 'what's best for the tribe' point of view, 'capitalism' is pathological. The ideology of "manifest destiny" continues to pervade the thinking of the Republican party, and is evidenced even more blatantly in all the underpinnings of the Tea Party movement, though they have all learned not to verbalize it." http://justonecynicsopinion.blogspot.com...Capitalism is a system of bosses gaining profits at the worker's expenses and is based solely on exploitation.There is absolutely nothing natural about the way Capitalism is operated.True Natural Selection would be where everyone is distributing wealth equally and working together for the advancement of the society, since that is the most beneficial way to live for the 'tribe.'Capitalism is detrimental toward the society and only benefits the greedy profiteers.If everyone was working together to create a better, more advanced society, and they all had the means (equal distribution of wealth) things would be actually be accomplished and the society would improve so much more.Under Capitalism, everyone is seperated and suffering while the profiteers are the only ones benefiting and the society continues to be terrible. Tribes have always distributed wealth, not because "the government enforced equality" but because it was the most beneficial towards society.Socialism is not solely a just and humanitarian economic system, it is also the most beneficial for the society.It is completely false that "Capitalism is based on natural selection." Socialism has existed before Capitalism came and corrupted everyone and made society sufferDuring the Spanish revolution, the Anarchists had a thriving, beautiful society built on humanity and compassion for each other.They also produced much more than they have ever before under a Capitalist economic system. Much more people were working together since everyone was entitled to a job, there was much more of an incentive to work since they didn't have oppressive bosses over their heads and they owned the factory, and they all worked hard together in order to create a better society.