mother theresa did Not deserve a Nobel Peace Prize

mother theresa was a delusional clown and in 1979, the Nobel Peace Prize showed that humans error. Her name and any other names of people, places or things that claim religious lunacy Do Not deserve to be capitalized. Politically incorrect or Not, that pile of DNA devalues the words mother and prize. She encouraged suffering more than jerry sandusky encouraged 10 yr olds to get naked :) No Rules. Go Nuts Not sure where you got that word, or if you just invented it for a rap battle, but Im sure you meant "epiphany" Either way, a person can claim Elvis is alive and call it an epiphany, big deal, all that proves is people are delusional sometimes :) Now lets get back to motherphucker theresa, the worthless pile of DNA that used the precious shield of humility called religion to gain noteriety :) The phrase "mother theresa fraud" entered into Google returned me 854,000 results, lets see which results we should use in this debate. Since you like Wikipedia, here you go: Towards the end of her life, Mother Teresa attracted some negative attention in the Western media. The journalist Christopher Hitchens was one of her most active critics. He was commissioned to co-write and narrate the documentary Hell's Angel about her for the British Channel 4 after Aroup Chatterjee encouraged the making of such a programme, although Chatterjee was unhappy with the "sensationalist approach" of the final product.[67] Hitchens expanded his criticism in a 1995 book, The Missionary Position.[85] Chatterjee writes that while she was alive Mother Teresa and her official biographers refused to collaborate with his own investigations and that she failed to defend herself against critical coverage in the Western press. He gives as examples a report in The Guardian in Britain whose "stringent (and quite detailed) attack on conditions in her orphanages ... [include] charges of gross neglect and physical and emotional abuse",[86] and another documentary Mother Teresa: Time for Change? broadcast in several European countries.[67] The German magazine Stern published a critical article on the first anniversary of Mother Teresa's death. This concerned allegations regarding financial matters and the spending of donations. The medical press has also published criticism of her, arising from very different outlooks and priorities on patients' needs.[77] Other critics include Tariq Ali of the New Left Review and the Irish investigative journalist Donal MacIntyre.[85] She has also been criticised for her view on suffering. She felt that suffering would bring people closer to Jesus.[87] Sanal Edamaruku, President of Rationalist International, criticised the failure to give painkillers, writing that in her Homes for the Dying, one could "hear the screams of people having maggots tweezered from their open wounds without pain relief. On principle, strong painkillers were not administered even in severe cases. According to Mother Teresa's philosophy, it is 'the most beautiful gift for a person that he can participate in the sufferings of Christ'."[88] The quality of care offered to terminally ill patients in the Homes for the Dying has been criticised in the medical press. The Lancet and the British Medical Journal reported the reuse of hypodermic needles, poor living conditions, including the use of cold baths for all patients, and an approach to illness and suffering that precluded the use of many elements of modern medical care, such as systematic diagnosis.[77] Dr. Robin Fox, editor of The Lancet, described the medical care as "haphazard", as volunteers without medical knowledge had to make decisions about patient care, because of the lack of doctors. He observed that her order did not distinguish between curable and incurable patients, so that people who could otherwise survive would be at risk of dying from infections and lack of treatment. Dr. Fox makes it a point to contrast the term "hospice", on the one hand, with what he calls "Mother Teresa's Care for the Dying" on the other hand; noting that, while hospice emphasises minimising suffering with professional medical care and attention to expressed needs and wishes of the patient, her approach does not.[89] Colette Livermore, a former Missionary of Charity, describes her reasons for leaving the order in her book Hope Endures: Leaving Mother Teresa, Losing Faith, and Searching for Meaning. Livermore found what she called Mother Teresa's "theology of suffering" to be flawed, despite being a good and courageous person. Though Mother Teresa instructed her followers on the importance of spreading the Gospel through actions rather than theological lessons, Livermore could not reconcile this with some of the practices of the organization. Examples she gives include unnecessarily refusing to help the needy when they approached the sisters at the wrong time according to the prescribed schedule, discouraging sisters from seeking medical training to deal with the illnesses they encountered (with the justification that God empowers the weak and ignorant), and imposition of "unjust" punishments, such as being transferred away from friends. Livermore says that the Missionaries of Charity "infantilized" its sisters by prohibiting the reading of secular books and newspapers, and emphasizing obedience over independent thinking and problem-solving.[90] Hitchens and Stern have said Mother Teresa did not focus donated money on alleviating poverty or improving the conditions of her hospices, but on opening new convents and increasing missionary work.[91] Mother Teresa accepted donations from the autocratic and corrupt Duvalier family in Haiti and openly praised them. She accepted $1.25 million from Charles Keating, involved in the fraud and corruption scheme known as the Keating Five scandal and supported him before and after his arrest. The Deputy District Attorney for Los Angeles, Paul Turley, wrote to Mother Teresa asking her to return the donated money to the people Keating had stolen from, one of whom was "a poor carpenter". The donated money was not accounted for, and Turley did not receive a reply.[92] Now lets use the remaining space in this round for some True Scripture, not that watered down stuff from 2000 yrs ago. DevientGenie 2:7--For those who are smarty pants, the Genie is not deviAnt in any evil way, the second 'e' is testament to that fact. He is merely splashing a glass of ice water on the world :) Secrets 2:41--The Genie was infected early in life with religious poison, which resulted in delusional thoughts in his past, then he turned 12 yrs old :) BigKids 12:49--There are many ways to describe the tool known as science, however, the best way to describe science is by David Guetta, Sexy B-I-T-C-H :) STUDS 5:14--Obviously a confident man has a greater chance of bringing a female to orgasm. A confident straight man is Not intimidated nor is he in any way threatened by gay men, therefore, if a man is a homophobe, your girl gets "cheered up" better with the Genie :) Ideal 8:18--Great minds of men and women will come along and play the role of slayer against the proliferation of religious fairy tales as fact :) Poisonous 6:8--At the end of the day, when all the dust settles, its just a matter of splitting hairs, semantics, and different interpretations of lunacy, then put it together, call it a religion of some sort, and a human can be poisoned by religious dogma, regardless of genius level intellect, to also be a creationist . Now thats some powerful poison :) DUH 1:7--Its called faith because its Not evidence :) BigKids 2:19--There's a reason the words genius, and brilliant minded are Not everyday adjectives in regards to a high level priest, pastor or other religious leader, however, genius and brilliant minded in regards to a high level scientist go together quite well :) CaptainObvious 4:30--In the year 2013, denying evolution proves you understand science like a shark understands cooking its food first :)