RyuuKyuzo should be allowed in the DDO Debating League

Noob Sniping Firstly, I'd like to state quickly what noob-sniping is, in my eyes, as it is entirely possible my opponent missed the point. Noob-sniping is going against opponents with one, two debates, being on the site for no more than a few days, and end up leaving the site for good before they complete even one debate. We have a lot of these on the site. My opponent, though, has most of his debates in the field of "noob-sniping". Now, point a is my opponent explicitly stating "I am a noob", and debating new debaters my opponent explicitly states means he is "merely debating his peers". As such, he seems to be admitting that his standard of debaters is at this level. Not at the standard demanded by the league in question he is trying to get into. Being a good amateur is all well and good, but we would not let a chess player with 21 wins at school level go against Kasparov, would we? No, because debating incredibly weak opponents does not make you a good debater. There is no barrier put up that stops my opponent from debating better debaters, and his complaint that he cannot do so is not my fault, nor anyone in the league's fault, and we do not have the responsibility to accomodate him. Rebuttals are the most important in debatingTo say this again, I feel that rebuttal debating is the most important. I made this clear to my opponent. Yet he cites a debate to us which is another example of a debater picking an uncontentious issue and plagiarising, with no rebuttal. As such, it would be ridiculous to accept someone on these grounds. Non-contentious issues Uncontentious resolutions such as the ones I presented means that it is near impossible for CON to win. Promoting eugenics, for example, requires an astoundingly skilled debater, while countering it is just a simple plea to emotion and precedence fluffed up a bit. The astronomical theory is a good example of the argument I put forwards. It is a TV stunt, not a scientifically accepted hypothesis. If anyone seriously contends this is a highly debated issue, I urge a vote against me. However, if you see any of the memes (or even the show, and I'm sorry for you if you had) and realise that it is a laughable idea, then I urge a vote CON. The eugenics debate is the same: no-one takes this as a serious position. It is unreasonable to expect my opponent to call this a 'good debate'. Finally take the vegan debate. Roy pretty much said what I wrote before: PRO had no ability to link his arguments back to the resolution. One could simply have put "No argument links back to proving the resolution" and one would have refuted his opponent's case. This is not a sign of a great debater, but rather one with eyes and the ability to read. Also, I want to point out the contentious debate that has made my opponent think it is good to join the scholarly DDO Debating League (That is, a debating league aimed at high quality debates on contentious philosophical, political or economic issues) is "Mitt Romney's name is more swell Barack Obama's". How is this possibly able to be classed as a scholarly debate? One cannot be expected to class someone as a 'great debater' for scholarly debating if this is his idea of a good debating resolution. Bad opponentsMy opponent in the long and short concedes this. He claims he challenged Leafrod, and he said no because " I don't come to Debate. org for debates". Moreover, Leafrod still isn't a 'great debater'. Cirrk, phantom, Roylatham, Cody_Franklin, Danielle, imabench, lordknukle, there are a lot of debaters that are of the greats (and I apologise to those I missed out) that can be challenged. The fact that my opponent has not got a debate from one of these is of no fault of my own, and I have no responsibility in this regard. I do not force debates in the league, all I do is record them. The league gives no help to any debater, nor forces people to debate. It just exists as a record. One bullet in the chamberThe fact that there are no more arguments by my opponent implies he has presented his entire case. As such, I'll move on from this point. ConclusionTo conclude, my opponent hardly managed to rebut each of my points - which is predictable, as it is based on simple observation. Without participating in contentious debates, against good debaters, or even in good debates, it is unfair to those who take part with the wish of recording their debates against he best debaters on the site to have worse debaters take part.