The existence of God is plausible

the man arguing against the existence of god has a devil for an icon. That's just downright hilarious. Good luck sir!Hah, yea, that is pretty ironic :p1. The Anthropic Cosmological principalThe existence of life is more or less incredible because we only have extremely limited experience with it. Logically we will find it incredible because we lack the technology or evidence to find it elsewhere. However the thing is that life DID happen, which means its creation is more or less a moot point. What are the odds that life could exist? Well we are evidence that the chance is 100% because it DID happen. The fact that it did as a result of a lot of complexities, while very interesting and astronomically small, are no signs of an intelligent designer no more than the grand canyon is nothing more than signs of errosion. We as humans simply lack enough intelligence to accept this.2. Free willLikewise, a true Christian cannot logically accept the belief in free will. God KNOWS of what will happen, by definition he is omnipotent. He knows of the future before it happens, therefore it is impossible to change the course of events as God has already foreseen them, and if it can be foreseen, then it must be. Free will is not something specific to humans. Many animals we see display some level of free will [1]. The general idea is that Free Will was established as biologically beneficial for all animals, the ability to evaluate a situation and change your actions based on certain perameters. We see this in day to day life: a cat generally will be hostile or cautious to strangers while being affectionate to its owners, while SOME cats are affectionate to strangers and other cats are hostile to family owners. The lack of consistancy in something as intelligent as a cat demonstrates some level of willpower and personality.3. ConsciousnessThe fact that humans are self aware, while philosophically interesting, is hardly specific to humans. Some Chimpanzees and Dolphins show signs of self awareness [2] and these 2 species are regarded as one of the fairly more intelligent animals outside of humans. So self awareness isn't exactly human specific.In regards to machines never being conscious, this is highly debatable. The Z1 Computer built in 1938 was at best able to do limited mathematics and do things based on a put in punch card. Now we have things like Cleverbot, a program that you can actually uphold a conversation with.While we don't have concrete understanding of how these things work specifically and in detail, this is not valid enough reason to assume that there is in fact a higher power. Before the 1600's, it was assumed that sicknesses were caused by various causes, including being an evil or sinful person, having bad karma, witches, and so on. It was only the discovery of bacteria were we able to quite accurately discover what was causing diseases. [3] While we do not know how exactly free will and self awareness works and the origins of our universe, history has pretty consistantly shown that we first assume something is the result of a higher power, then we advance enough to understand it in full detail until it becomes common knowledge.[1] http://io9.com...[2] http://www.intropsych.com...[3] http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu...