Were Disney Movies Better In The 1990s? I SAY YES!

I did look at the links above. There are two main ways to give animation a "personal flare." One is the look. The other is the movement. I proved already that the movement is not overly unique in Disney's Renaissance. I also proved that modern Disney movies have their own look and tone, mostly using color schemes. It's not a lack of creativity that leads to similar characters. It's limitations of newer forms of animation that we haven't had a chance yet to fully explore. Still, this newer animation is superior enough that it is better than the Renaissance even in these earlier stages. Besides, even if the similar starting blocks are visible, it's simply untrue that the characters "cannot be identified without closer examination." Similar does not equal identical. The fact that there were minute details for my picture to point out proves that characterization was considered in the design of these princesses. Actually, having small differences proves that a lot of thought was put into it, instead of just changing the face shape and calling it good. They actually thought about details that these different people would have. It fits Anna's innocence to have a round face and freckles. The modern animation allows for an all new era of movies. The whole point of Big Hero 6 was the cool effects. Baymax wouldn't have been as lovable if we couldn't almost feel his fluid-like texture. The sight gags were the best part. Visuals also created the action and suspense. Those battle scene animations would not have worked at all in 2D. So, as you can see, even modern Disney can survive based on looks. Elsa's ending change is not sudden. She starts her stay in the ice castle looking happy and free. As she remains there, she gradually becomes more distressed. Anna's visit causes a lot of concern for her, but so does the attack. Everything builds. Not all the character development is shown directly through plot, though. You have to look at her facial expressions and body language. These things can be more clearly animated today because of superior animation technology. This is why not every change needs a whole scene devoted to only characterization. You can see Elsa changing even when other things are going on. Besides, Elsa's change had to slow down slightly while she hid in the castle. Anna needed a chance to develop. It's a sister story because the ending is all about sisterly love, as was the inciting incident. All conflicts center around it. It doesn't call for 24/7 interaction. You say that too much of the movie is spent on Anna and Kristoff's relationship development, but then you also claim Anna didn't develop. These interactions with Kristoff were her development. She never could have had conversations like that at the beginning of the movie. She was too awkward as a result of her lack of social experience. Throughout the film, she first learns to talk, then to develop true romantic feelings. No, she didn't have a monologue explaining everything. That would be boring. Her actions show her character change. We learn that she is capable. At the beginning, Anna is a bumbling idiot. She isn't coordinated enough to walk around a palace. Throughout the film, she has to stretch her abilities. No, Anna's relationship did not play out in a stereotypical Disney fashion. Their flirting wasn't obvious. That's how it works in real life, though. They hid their feelings at first because they hadn't learned yet how to interact. By the end, we can see the love. Her feelings for Kristoff as a friend were evident. She had to learn to have a friendship before she could have a relationship. Disney had to make their relationship more subtle to show a contrast between Kristoff and Hans. Kristoff had to take it slow. Reindeer Are Better Than People is barely long enough to qualify as a song. Still, it does show Kristoff's awkward character and explain his style of flirting. Anyway, it serves the same purpose as In Summer: to be funny. We must remember that these are children movies. Kids love Olaf. I've worked with kids and done Frozen style activities with them- Olaf is always a favorite. Movies have to have development and appeal to adults, but they can't forget their target audience. The reason Frozen was so commercially successful is because kids love it as well as adults. There's nothing wrong with having some endearing comic relief. The songs serve as character development. Music doesn't mean everything stops. It advances the film, as I already explained. Kristen doesn't need a ton of background because it doesn't matter. What would it add to the film? We can already tell his character because of the way he talks and moves. When you have good acting and animation, you can cut back exposition time. Overall, modern Disney movies are just immersive and beautiful. The animation does indeed tell an attractive story. It looks cool and realistic. Animation is only improving, and the stories are well-developed.