It is more probable than it is improbable that a monotheistic and at least Deistic God exist.

Let me begin with some definitions and ground rules. I will use Richard Dawkins God hypothesis to fully clarify what we are arguing about. p.52 paragraph 1 Richard Dawkins the God Delusion. "There exists a superhuman, supernatural intelligence who deliberately designed and created the universe and everything in it, including us." The supernatural part is critical, because as computers become more advanced it is becoming more feasible for the universe to be a computer simulation created by aliens who evolved. Alternatively, extremely intelligent aliens may have evolved and then created this universe using some extremely advanced technology that would be indistinguishable from magic via Clark's third law. These two scenarios would not qualify as God creating the universe due to the lack of a supernatural component."Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." ClarkThat being said Counterfeit World, Tron, and Matrix scenarios would be under God not existing. Same goes for Inception, where the god-like aliens have constructed some sort of dream state that humans live in. What is the difference between god-like extraterrestrials and a supernatural God? The difference can be found in history. Throughout history relativity advanced civilizations have come in contact with primitive indigenous civilizations. The advanced civilization is god-like in comparison to the primitive civilization. Medicine, weapons, transportation, and knowledge that can easily woo the less advanced civilization. If you have never seen a canon, boat, nor musket in your life, what chances do you have to fight against these? This is an example of God-like.Nevertheless, the medicine, weapons, transportation, and knowledge from these God-like invaders are not miracles. They were constructed via human hands. Technology gradually advancing. A supernatural God is one that produces miracles like that of the Hebrew Bible, Christian Bible, and Koran. I will now proceed with my argument. The God hypothesis suffers from infinite regressions, irreducibly complexity, and omniscience and omnipotence being mutually incompatible. A. Infinite regressionsA creator must be more complex than the creation. Think of a blacksmith and a horse shoe. The horse shoe cannot create a blacksmith. A blacksmith is more complex than the creation, the horse shoe. The same could be said for a tailer and a dress, and a cook and pasta. The immediate question is who or what created God? Whoever or whatever created God must be more complex, leading to the question who created the creator of God, and so forth ad infinitum. B. Irreducibly complexity God must be very complex in order to create the universe and everything in it, including humans. There is no way to reduce God to a less complex state. C. Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually incompatibleOmniscience means God can predict the future. Omnipotence means God can do whatever he wants. That being said, does God have free will? If God already knows what God will do in the future, can God change his mind and thus change the future? A being cannot have both omniscience and omnipotence. Three possible solutions, God, chance, and natural selection. I have already shown how God is extremely unlikely to exist. Now there are two more possible solutions chance and evolution. Creationists and scientists have already ruled out chance. Therefore, there is only one best solution. Evolution gives a gradual slope, showing how organisms evolved slowly over millions of years. The idea of evolution can be applied to fields outside biology. That through slow natural processes that the universe was formed. Now, there still is a very small chance God exists. Why then is natural selection and other natural gradual processes a better solution? The answer is probability. Just as above chance has been ruled out statistically, the chances of evolution and other natural processes being the correct answer is better than the God hypothesis. In summary, although nobody can disprove the existence of God entirely, my argument is based upon probability and the probability that the universe as we known it was formed via natural processes is much greater than that of God creating the universe. Thank you for the debate, I'll respond to your round one arguments in round two. Sources. http://tvtropes.org...