what we commonly believe to be hell is not place of torment

I will now rebuttal my opponents case and the go into to the stronger case of this debate being the pro.First we should not be using the Internet to get our definitions, over time translations of the original words have been misconstrued. So we need to use a more reliable source for definitions being the bible.....specifically mines is......the new world translation of the holy scriptures.witch I will be using to define the following terms.....by the way all these can be looked up in the back 0f the bibleSheol-Hebrew word for hell, the graveyard, the pitHades-Greek word for hell, the gravehell-the pit, the graveyard of the deadGehenna- is an actual place on earth, the valley of hinnon witch is just outside of the walls of Jerusalem. it was the site of idolaratous worship, child sacrifice etc..... In the first century it was used as an incinerator for "the filth of Jerusalem" Bodies of dead animals ere thrown there. No humans were thrown there at least not alive. so obviously Gehenna is not a place of torment and is not even "commonly believed hell."....gehenna is something separate.( also the lake of fire has eternal torture witch I will further explain latter, but if a live human was tossed into gehenna they would die within 30 minutes at longest.....so obviously its not eternal torture since you would eventually die in the flames)At Matthew 10:28, Jesus warned his followers to"be in fear of him that can destroy the body and soul in Gehenna." What does it mean? Notice that there is no mention here of torment in the fires of gehenna. by referring to the "soul"(witch the soul and persons life is the same thing) separately, Jesus emphasised that god can destroy a persons life prospects. thus there's no hope for ressurection.So Jesus used gehenna as an analogy to symbolize a permanent cut offSo please lets stick to my biblical definitions............now onto my opponents case(hopefully I have enough characters to finish....lol)he states; "All that die now go straight to Sheol as my opponent said, but when the day of second judgment comes, all the wicked will be cast into Gehenna. Gehenna is the lake of fire as used in the bible but is translated as hell in the NRSV."I don't know what the nrsv is but like I said the bible is the only reliable source of evidence here.....about the day of judgement..... as I have clearly defeated and will further defeat my opponents claim of gehenna and the lake of fire being the same thing.Here's a quote by my opponent “And I saw the dead…..and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things….. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.”- Revelations 20:11-15 (I looked these up...and)at rev 20;13-and the sea gave up those dead in it, and death and Hades gave up those dead etc.....( clearly this shows that only those in Hades are dead,)rev 14-15"and death and Hades were hurled into the lake of fire.....furthermore whoever was not found written in the book of life was hurled into the lake of fire.( it says death and Hades(hell) was hurled into the lake of fire....why would hell be thrown into itself????? the context of the sentence and the facts and logic within this sentence further proves that what we commonly believe to be hell is not a place of torture......but is in fact separate from hell......as it states in the bible it is second death.)another piece of my opponents case.... "Why did Jesus and Job go to hell? 1)It is commonly accepted that Jesus died for our sins. So in a since, you could say Jesus took our place in hell." absolutely not this logic is extremely flawed.....since my opponent wants to claim that hell is a eternal fiery place of torment witch is absolutely wrong........why is Jesus resurrected if hell is a eternal place of punishment.if hell is the same as gehenna(and its not) witch as I stated earlier if you go there, there is no hope of resurrection. then how would his soul be retrievable to be resurrected? Now if the viewers and my opponents link everything I've said together I have rebutted my opponents case threw logic, scriptures, and facts. my case stands ineffectively rebutted therefore I should win this debate. For my opponent to win he needs to effectively awnser my questions and contradict the logic of my position. Going back to the stronger case of the debate being pro "what we commonly believe to be hell is not a place of torment" 1. First of all to be tormented would mean that you could feel pain or some sort of mental anguish.Eccl. 9:5, 10 -The living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all...all that your hand finds to do, do with your very power, for there is no work nor devising nor knowledge nor wisdom in sheol, the place for witch you are going.ps. 146:4 - his spirit goes out, he goes back to his ground;in that day his thoughts do perish. ........if we are conscious of nothing then we obviously don't feel pain or anything else for that matter, and since there's obviously no knowledge, that means we wouldn't be capable of knowing pain. Also thoughts perish witch also supports my claim. besides my opponent failing to defeat this he also fails to tackle 2. Job 14;13(job was alive at the time and was considered a very good man by god) Who will grant me this, that thou mayst protect me in hell, and hide me till thy wrath pass, and appoint me a time when thou wilt remember me?.........this shows that good people go to hell as well it also shows that there is no eternal torture because it doesn't make sense for god to punish a man considered good by god..........also the fact that Jesus was in hell.....why would god allow Jesus to be tortured or punished when he was perfect???