God is Real, Evolution isn't

You say that the evolution theory is called a theory because it is nothing more than a theory. It is not just a theory, it is an undeniable reality. It has never, to my knowledge, been proven wrong. Due to the abundance of evidence surrounding it, it has far more credibility than your theory of man being created from dust. Over one hundred caveman skeletons have been found. Probably more, it's just a rough estimate. We can see from their anatomy that they are not the modern species of human, and not exactly an ape. They are something in between. The first caveman skeletons were discovered, coincidentally, during an era of scientific enlightenment. People were finally starting to put the shackles of religion behind them, and discover other ways of looking at the world. One thing I think is sick, however, is the 1920s case in which a teacher was brought to trial for teaching children evolution. https://en.wikipedia.org... This shows that Christianity is intolerant to other opinions, and, at this point in history, it was illegal to spread the truth. I don't think it's funny, I think it reflects the fractured psyche of a disgusting society. If I lived during this era, I'd hang up posters of Darwin all over. Nothing to do with the argument, really, I just thought I'd point it out. Your ignorance is once more shown when you assert that the development of wings on birds had no direct advantages. It had many advantages. There were many dangers to prehistoric birds, many fearsome creatures who could eat them. By flying, they were able to nest where fearsome predators could not reach them, and thus, they manages to avoid extinction. Everything in the evolutionary process has some kind of advantage. Your ignorance is shown again when you say that birds could not change. Once more, you wrongly assume that evolution is a quick process. Something does not evolve in the same animal, simple genetic traits are very gradually altered within a species. Due to your religious upbringing, you confuse "The world being created in seven days" with the actual creation of the world. Biological processes don't happen quick. The universe has existed for an unimaginable amount of time. Another flaw to your bird argument is that you assume the things before birds didn't have wings. Birds were evolved from dinosaurs, and some were probably evolved from pterodactyls, which were already quite adept at flying. There was probably never a bird with only half a wing. The wings grew out gradually, about a millimeter per generation, and the bird was patient while the wings grew in. You assume that the growth of wings on birds was a cognitive process. they did not choose how to evolve. Nothing decides to evolve, it simply happens, over millions of years. Birds, as you pointed out, grew hollow bones to become more aerodynamic, but they did not decide to, it was born out of necessity. They needed to fly, so they did. You also compare flying birds to flying humans, declaring that both are impossible. We cannot fly because it defies the laws of physics. We have too high a body mass and our arms don't have enough surface area. Birds have a low body mass and a wide wingspan, so they can fly. It's not just an insane coincidence that birds fly, they do so through the use of science, such as physics, the study of motion, and a series of complicated mathematical equations involving gravity and so on. Once more, it all boils down to science. But you don't care, you choose instead to cling to your religion. Humans have not evolved wings because we had no reason to. Unlike birds, we were capable of killing a saber toothed tiger or some other predator, we did not have to fly away. We were too heavy to nest in trees, and we preferred a hunter gatherer system. Wings were not necessary for us. We might still evolve them, but that could be millions of years away. You seem to put a lot of ridicule towards the idea of flying humans for a person whose religion revolves almost completely around flying humans. That's what angels are. All plants, animals, and insects are in a continual state of change, it's just so slow we don't notice it. And just so you know, insects are a type of animal according to the five biological kingdoms of living things. No two creatures or human are identical. There are roughly 8.7 million species currently on this world, including bacteria, and every member of each species has a different personality. You can see that God couldn't have created all these animals, it would be too much work. You can see that these millions of animals could only have been the result of eons of evolution. Look at the bible. Of course, it only mentions bears, lions, and dogs, because those were the only animals that humanity knew at the time. Once we began to spread out, though, we discovered new species. Since the bible does not mention 8.7 million species, it can not be used as a reliable resource. According to Noah's ark, Noah had to get two of every animal. Nobody living, even today, could manage to collect every species of animal from a catastrophic flood, and if there really was an apocalyptic event like that, the results would be much more noticeable. Finally, your flawed argument involving anatomy. You think, for some unclear reason, that evolution only started with one of three things: a heart, blood, or blood vessels. I'm not sure why you consider the circulatory system as an accurate representation of all anatomy, but you're completely wrong besides that. You must understand that there are other forms of anatomy than ours. Cows have four stomachs. Your reliance on human anatomy shows how little we think of other beings. I'll try to explain how evolution could exist without a heart or blood. The first living things were one celled organisms which dwelled in the abyss of oceans. They were relatively similar to modern bacteria, and they had very little anatomy, besides some genetic information and chemical compounds. These one celled organisms multiplied, and became much larger, until fish appeared. Fish began to have the anatomy we know today, then the fish came onto land, and turned into dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are a type of reptile, so by this point they had recognizable organs, and then the dinosaurs died out and mammals came out, and it's been that way ever since. By the time of the first human like creatures, their anatomy was very much the same, with a working circulatory system and all the other organs we rely on. Throughout the eons, animals have been able to live on their own, without any parts missing. they developed reproduction as a way to ensure the existence of their species. Everything can, in some way or another, be explained using science. I await your last argument. Please try to make sense.