Resolve: Cyberbullying should be a criminal offense

First of all, I would like to say that I have clearly won this debate already because Con has dropped ALL of my arguments. Do to this fact, it is safe to guess that my opponent has accepted all of my arguments, and can't refute them. Next, I want to point out that when voting, I should get the points for conduct since my opponent has displayed poor conduct. She has introduced a new argument half way through the debate. What she SHOULD have done is respond to my arguments. Now, cyberbullying is not a "petite" offense. I have searched three sources, and all definitions of petite refer to women. I will use a better word. How about minor? So, if cyberbullying truly were a minor offense, then it wouldn't lead to mental issues, misery, and death. Bullying(a.k.a. cyberbullying) may not have any specific laws in some states(most DO have laws on bullying), but it is a direct violation to the United States constitution(all clues have pointed to this debate being in reference to US law). The US constitution guarantees EVERYONE the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In fact, these are not only rights guaranteed by the US government, they are GOD GIVEN. So, bullying is not only a violation of law in most states, it violates the rights guaranteed in the constitution, and it violates God. Now, even if cyberbullying were a minor offense, it being illegal would NOT make all minor "things" a criminal offense. Most people have heard this before LIFE IS NOT FAIR! Therefore, we don't have to make everything an offense. Now, here's a challenge for my opponent. Can you name at least 5 minor "things" that would be "have" to be a criminal offense if cyberbullying automatically became a criminal offense in every state? If you can, you MIGHT ( a BIG might) have a small argument. Some states not having bullying/cyberbullying as a criminal offense hardly supports my opponent. Here's why. 44 states have bullying as an offense, or have proposed it as an offense, and 30 states include electronic harassment(includes cyberbullying as far as I'm concerned). http://www.cyberbullying.us... Most states, therefore, are in agreement with me, and it doesn't matter if 6 states agree with my opponent because the vastly overwhelming majority agree with me. I'd also like to point out that you don't create a law in a day, there could be plans to discuss making bullying a criminal offense, and the law just hasn't been proposed yet. So, for all we know, all states COULD be in agreement with me. We know that the reverse cannot be true for my opponent. Essentially my opponent has said to suck it up when someone is making your life miserable and driving you to suicide. How sadistic can a human possibly be? Now my opponent has said that you should talk it out. This is not always possible. Ever heard of post traumatic stress disorder? Shell shock? Soldier's heart? They are all things that occur when a person becomes extremely terrified. The three terms I used refer to different wars, but the point is the same. These occurrences couldn't be talked out of it. They are affected FOREVER. You cannot always "talk it out". Cyberbullying is not a mistake. A mistake is taking a wrong turn or accidentally saying something embarrassing about someone. In both instances what has been done can be undone. In psychological cases, effects are permanent. Intentional bullying is NO MISTAKE! The perpetrator is intentionally making the life of another human miserable. This cannot be allowed. A person is embarrassing or harassing someone over and over is not a mistake. If you accidentally do something bad, and apologize for it, then there is no punishment. THAT would be a mistake, but over and over? No. Finally, outlawing cyberbullying permanently wouldn't make everything fall to pieces, it would make things better. Less people would commit suicide, they would be happier, and the God given rights listed in the constitution would be left intact. I extend all of my previous arguments since none of them have been argued. FYI: I'm kind of sorry that I was able to spend so many characters rebutting one paragraph. This is because I should have had more to rebut, and I should have had to defend my arguments, but no. Con was unable to do anything other then post one measly new argument. Vote Pro to stop the abuse. Vote Con for death and despair.