A New Radical Justice System

When I was a little boy, say five years old, I would be what most would consider a highly philosophically-minded child. When my teacher told me that I should put my hand up to ask a question I asked her why, when she got annoyed she would just tell me to shut up and sit down (in kinder words than the ones I proposed). However, I never understood the rule, nor did I feel the need to obey it... Because being shut up and told to sit down isn't truly terrifying. On the other hand, if I had been caned for such a minor 'crime' in the rules then it clearly reduces the effectiveness of making a student realise what's truly wrong and what's slightly wrong and makes them see breaking the rule of not talking in class as equally bad/good as breaking the rule of not raping their best friend. This is where my attack on imprisonment originated. Sure, worse crimes mean longer sentences but realistically prison is prison. What prison teaches society is that the law is either entirely stupid or entirely worthy. So if a person has to choose between stealing or arson, which should they pick? Now, it seems common sense to pick theft but think harder. If a prison sentence, where getting gang raped and treated like a worthless slave is the norm, is the punishment for both theft and arson which would you pick? Well the first line of logic is that if you're going to get bullied in a horribly degrading place named prison you might as well go in for a legendary crime. The second line of logic is that it's far easier to spot a thief, what with a CCTV camera on practically every street in the more economically developed countries, than it is to spot an arsonist. The arson could merely have been ignited by a lighted piece of paper thrown far from the arsonist's hand to a patch of gasoline of dry wood far from where they are standing. This is far harder to pin on one person than a theft is. Even worse is that if it is done at a petrol station, it can so easily be made out to be a 100% accident. And even then, there could be diminished responsibility if the person happened to have any mental disorder etc. Thus, despite the average human seeing burning down people and/or forests as far worse than theft, if we objectively observed the justice system in place it would be wiser for one to be an arsonist than a thief.However, where my radically new justice system (revealed after this) is truly going to change things is in cases where rape, murder and torture are all given pretty much equal punishments: Jailed for life. However, I guarantee you that I would never rank a guy who shot another person in the back of the head anywhere near as bad a person as one who does things as vulgar as paper-cutting a woman's vagina, inseminating a nine year old who happened to hit puberty early enough to have gotten pregnant from it. But believe it or not, the current justice system, in almost any country, would sentence both men to jail till death (or 30 years+ in most non Muslim countries, since 'life sentence' is only valid in the Middle East and certain Muslim African countries, such as Egypt and Somalia)IS THIS FAIR?!NO!Can we change it with the current system?! NO!!Should a murderer and torturer be given the same punishment when the torture blatantly gave more pain?!NO!!!Most people who have known me in life have described me as a mad-man, a genius of the rarest kind, the next Hitler and a fool. Most names came before my system was suggested and after I told my justice system to people they have freaked out saying it's insanely wrong and unjustified. If you are merely going to take the position of Con and say I'm not normal or sane or that I'm incorrect because I don't conform to normality please 'x' this page now because I don't have time for you conformist fools of society. You don't know what is truth and what is lie.Now I shall propose the system:When to use prison: If the accused has not been directly been seen as the only person who could have done the crime and is merely claimed to be the most likely form evidence that vaguely makes it seem as if no one else but them would have done it (for example, you don't know who raped the woman but the woman vaguely remembers a face and voice and it matches a man, with not other witnesses). Theft (not gunpoint money-taking). When the person was a bystander or 'assistant' in a crime. They should be punished, yes, but not nearly as bad as the perpetrator themselves. When a person was blackmailed or threatened to do a crime. Illicit drug abuse. Those under age of 15. [Asylum perhaps instead of prison] The mentally retarded or insane. Accidental crime Policy crime (a manager's workplace doesn't meet the health standards of his/her profession) Prison sentence length shall be relative to crime. The exact lengths might still be debatable due to different cultures and societies.When to use my system [I shall explain what 'my system' is just after this]: Physical crimes of any kind (if any physical contact was made in the crime where the perpetrator is the only possible one. Gunpoint crimes, or blackmail crimes [to the blackmailer not the blackmailed] Mental torture or abuse to child or adult alike Any crime to an infant (<5) and child (<15) but the perpetrator must be over 14 to recieve my system. When a clear admittion to crime is made When there is no ambiguity over the crime When concrete evidence to person is given, undeniable amount of videographic, photographic, audiographic evidence When over 10 witnesses give sworn testimony to having seen the person do the crime, all of whom are given a polygraph test (regardless of its validity, ther eis a clear sign between the stress of lying versus not lying that would lead to incresed pulse rate, the polygraph will work on at least on in ten people, probably) The only reason to resort to this condition is if the person completely denies doing hte crime despite clear accusation My system: It uses a robotic machine, perhaps resembling a human for physical crimes such as rape and torture For crimes where gunpoint and blackmailing was done, paid actors will emulate the crime, the robot will stand for any physical contact required, so they can't be accused The robot is controleld by trained professionals and the person is restrained the entire time If they raped someone, the exact physical thigns done to the woman, or infant, or even man, will be done to the person, if they lack necessary genitals something that is equivalent in units of del[1] shall be done to them If they tortured someone then the EXACT thing shall be done using the robot to administer it (a human might heistate and mess up If they killed, they get killed the exact same way, if this requires humans to assist then a robot is use dinstead but the exact physical act is done If they did things such as urinate or spit or make person dirnk horrible things, they will have exact thing put on them, we will get the victim or someone else to give us urine or spit (us meaning the governmental body). The facilities are paid with tax, or whatever method the current country has for funding prisons, often we can cut down on aalot of used prison spae and build these 'terror to stop terror' facilities The criminals will knwo the truth of pain and terror and what their victim went through If they did as a gang and humiliated the person and laughed as they did it, paid actors will emulate everythingt hat the traumatised person and/or witnesses give sworn testimony happened I promise you that in such a world, we'd come far closer to complete absence of crime.Sources:[1] http://www.iasp-pain.org...;