Creationism should be banned from science classes

I am showing real evidence and his is fake. Wow, I can do it too. Literally all you've done is say that every piece of evidence that I bring to light is fake and someone out there has proved it wrong. Clever. Would you mind proving even half of the things that come out of your mouth? Your references to science are almost always vague, And abstract. If I'm being honest I really did not have to try very hard to find a hole in this theory of evolution, And I won't have to try very hard to defend his feeble attempt to discredit God's word, And the truth of creation. OK, Let's start at the top: Evidence for young-earth creationism. After the findings of Mary Schweitzer, We continue to dig up fossils and find soft tissue, Soft tissue with c-14. Proving that the earth can be no more than 8, 000 years old. Common bacterial activity? Have you ever heard of the grand canyon? Layers and layers of rock that were laid so quickly that single cell organisms are separated by hundreds of feet of rock. What about the works of Hoyle that I cited? Oh, Sorry, I forgot, This can't possibly be true because it's old, And he isn't a biologist, Looks like he killed that argument. OK. The Evidence that the earth is less than 8, 000 years old is cited above, Besides that I believe the bible, Which by the way, Even under intense scrutiny has yet to be proven false historically. Job 40:15"19-15"Look now at the behemoth, Which I made along with you; He eats grass like an ox. 16See now, His strength is in his hips, And his power is in his stomach muscles. 17He moves his tail like a cedar; The sinews of his thighs are tightly knit. 18His bones are like beams of bronze, His ribs like bars of iron. 19He is the first of the mways of God; Only He who made him can bring near His sword. In Genesis God created every living creature on the earth. Genesis 1:25 New 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, The livestock according to their kinds, And all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. You don't find trees older than 8, 000 years old, But please attempt to enlighten me. I never ignored any of these questions. According to my opponent, Not only did natural intelligence evolve, But it evolved from RNA which can be formed by natural processes. Which still fails to answer where it comes from, Natural processes form DNA in our time. I'm asking you how could these processes have been the same before everything evolved? Even then, Where did THEY come from? How were the circumstances in place to create DNA when there was nothing? Let me raise you a much more accurate analogy. A tornado appeared from nothing, Ran through nothing, And in no time, There was a Boeing 747. I can only imagine why you followed this analogy so far. Also, Please cite your proof that I plagiarized anything, As you have accused me multiple times now. Thanks. It's not a conspiracy theory, It's an observation that the government obviously has an agenda. I won't follow out because it doesn't have a whole lot to do with this debate, And you have already done such a terrific job debunking it. Clearly a vice president and a few people in the republican party are enough to obliterate that argument. I believe that these findings that I have cited do indeed prove young-earth. The findings on those bones were much more substantial than alleged "bacterial activity". I believe that this statement was released as a cover up of the findings that Schweitzer stumbled upon. Yes, It would be unbelievable if there were no ancient pictures of dinosaurs, But there are several. Https://www. Genesispark. Com/exhibits/evidence/historical/ancient Has Homo Erectus been proven to be a different species? Or is your proof just the fact that it's not called Homo Sapiens? Let me know, Because that's pretty pathetic. In conclusion, All of my opponents "facts" and arguments are recycled evolutionist nonsense. His rebuttals are almost as pathetic at his attacks on creationism. I hope that all who read this pay close attention to his evasion of evidence. Evolution has spoiled the minds of many young Americans, Children who have grown up rejecting responsibility, Convinced that humans are the most intelligent and powerful beings in existence. So no, Evolution should not be taught as fact when it is not. Creationism on the other hand has been responsible for generations of modest, Hard working people. Realize finally, That at the very least, Creationism should not be thrown to the side so quickly when people like my opponent hold up this THEORY and pretend that its a fact.