Vi_Veri is hotter than theLwerd.

I have like 10 minutes to post this argument. "In discussion of the burden, my opponent offers two contradictory statements:" They aren't contradictory. The spirit of debate is often to argue for that which cannot necessarily be proven. That's why it's a debate. "I'd like to point out, voters, that he openly admits that her allegedly larger weight is "maybe... better". So, what he's really doing is conceding a possible hole in his side of the debate; I'd really like to crystallize the fact that, he is extremely close to conceding the debate here when he discusses how 'thick chicks are awesome'; and, since most of his opinions are what he uses to back his side up, you can use these statements against him." Yes, I said that thick chicks are awesome. However, not as awesome as girls like Vi_Veri. "And, really, he's trying to judge weight from a tiny part of an arm in a picture; there's no telling how wide or thin she is, so his entire argument could very well be based on fallacious evidence; keep that in mind." It's not really tiny. And, I should specify, there's much more evidence besides her arm. In general, she looks more weighty in the picture, based on her upper abdomen, her face, and her arm. "First of all, while my opponent may prefer brunettes over blondes, it may not be that way for most of the male population; again, try not to let his personal preferences count entirely as fact. A personal observation is far different than actual logic; he's simply using his preferences to make largely unwarranted assertions." It seems strange to me that you're choosing to cite my personal preferences against me in one argument and then disregard the preferences as purely subjective in another. "I'd first like to point out the contradiction here; he talks about how common paler skin is, yet he also states that a large ratio of girls are tanning; he needs to make up his mind as to which one is a larger proportion of people." This isn't a contradiction. Pale skin is common. Many people try to tan. If they tan themselves sometimes, that doesn't mean they don't have pale skin. "Second of all, it is once again a matter of personal preference; not everyone prefers tan over pale, or any color over any other. While my opponent says that he... loves that brown sugar... I for one don't mind pale skin; I've seen some very gorgeous girls that haven't tanned even a bit. It's all a matter of perspective." See above, about selective usage of the "personal preference" argument. "And this is the argument that's going to rock the flow for you; despite what my opponent might prefer, or what he says that the general public likes, sexual attraction is entirely a subjective matter; it all depends on the person you ask. Some males enjoy slim, others enjoy heavy, some enjoy blondes, others enjoy brunettes; some like intelligence, others don't; some like drinkers, others don't; some like tanned girl, others don't; I could go on with an infinite number of characteristics, but my point is that it all comes down to a matter of personal preference; and because, obviously, my opponent (hopefully) is not aware of the preference of a majority of the general public, he can not definitively prove to you that the user Vi_Veri is, without a doubt, more sexually attractive than the user theLwerd. If there's even the slightest doubt in your mind that he hasn't achieved his burden, you'll vote CON." This is all irrelevant. The voters will vote for whoever has done a better job of explaining why he thinks his position is the better one.