Debate.org is an excellent way to relieve an argumentative nature.

I don't like certain people on this site. They don't like me. It's not like I'm about to have the ability to prevent them from voting. __________________ Deduction leads to facts. Deduction is debate. "Superior" 1) Straight turn or inapplicable. Draxxt never specified exactly what Debate. org is superior to, so I had to use my definition. My definition did not specify what Debate. org is superior too, just like the resolution - If draxxt had said, say, Debate. org is a superior way to relieve an argumentative nature as opposed to arguing with your parents, then his refutation would stand true. Alas, that simply isn't the case. 2) So which definition is he using, exactly? Just a note; Draxxt has accepted that "excellent" and "superior" are interchangable. I said in my R1 that excellent = superior, and he did not refute that in his R2. "For the following two contentions, debate. org is an exemplary or "Excellent" way to relieve an argumentative nature" --- "exemplary" was not in any of his definitions of superior, nor is it in merriam-webster's definition of excellent (. http://www.merriam-webster.com...) so you can already drop his contentions. "Debate Teams" A. Just because they don't have the cash doesn't mean that formal debate isn't superior to debate. org, just as I can't afford a Boeing Dreamliner, but that doesn't mean it isn't superior to my model airplanes. Just because something is not financially available to some people does not invalidate it for comparison. B. Link previous response. "Authority Figures" A. Why do authority figures factor into whether or not something is superior? B. And why is not arguing against authority a good thing? C. I don't think that's the case. In formal debate (let's just say that instead of the 213908503748 different leagues out there) there's a topic, yes, but since there are limited topics and something they need to argue, people with argumentative natures would have to think harder and more creatively in order to put themselves into the topic. By having a site like debate. org where people can just word resolutions the way they want and debate as they will, they aren't harnessing as much creative and debating energy. __________________ This is why I win. 1) He argues my definition of "excellent", but does not specify an alternative. This means that my definition of "excellent" is the one used for the debate, and it is "Best at (whatever it describes). " 2) This takes out both his contentions in R2. 3) Even if his contentions aren't dropped, they don't prove how debate. org is the best way to relieve an argumentative nature, which is his burden in the round in order to win. Even if they're not dropped, they aren't topical as they link to the wrong definition of "excellent". 4) He has not responded to any of the impacts I presented in R1, which say that, among other things, formal debate is superior to debate. org when looking at what's better to relieve an argumentative nature, as formal debate requires more speed, creativity, and strategy, which are otherwise not so intense on debate. org. Since he has not proved his burden and I've shown something that's better at relieving an argumentative nature than debate.