Resolved: The average intelligence of a Fox News Anchor is = or < the average intelligence of a rock

A) The Video of rocks"Pro attempts to prove that…"when rocks [as shown in the provided video] coordinate and communicate to move a massive ship, they are demonstrating their intelligent powers. Pro gives no actual evidence of what is propelling this massive ship is a league of coordinating and communicating rocks. The only visible surface is sand. The intelligence of sand, however, is irrelevant to this debate. Pro, therefore, has yet to prove that rocks contain any intelligent powers. "So the Con attributes the moving of the ship to the sand since the rocks werent seen. If however I do show the rocks were moving the ship, then the rocks would be seen as intelligent, not the sand. So here is (lower quality) evidence showing it was indeed the rocks moving the ship, not the sand. . http://www.youtube.com... "Furthermore, when discussing the movement of the ship with the video owner, he said the movement of the ship was due to intelligent life, "The crabs moved the ship, loads of them. " Therefore, Pro is actually carving away at his own case with this counter-evidence. "That is an outright and blatant lie. I never said "The crabs moved the ship, loads of them" anywhere in this debate ever. You are misquoting me and then trying to use it against me, I now legitimately ask for a conduct penalty by the con for falsifying evidence. B) Issues with the analysis of videos in round 2"Only minute segments of each show was cited, enabling the viewer to see only the most what were perhaps merely extreme scenarios as relating to the intelligence (or lack thereof) of the anchor. "They were not extreme scenarios, they were the first things that came up when I researched the names of the anchors on youtube, I did not devote time to going out of my way to look for these scenes, they were the first thing that came up so this is normal footage of the quality of reporting from Fox News. "Because the "grade"ï¿½ given the video clip was bestowed by Pro himself, it is fairly obvious that the potential for the grade to be biased or slanted towards Pro's purposes exists. "If you had a problem with it you shouldnt have waited until my last round to say something about it! I voted fairly on the videos presented regarding the reporting by giving them approval or disapproval, you seem to be more concerned about my word choice instead of the guilty verdict, but the word choice isnt relevant, the videos speak for themselves. "Lastly, there was no evidence cited to prove that the information given by the anchors in the videos is misleading"I cannot waste character space arguing that Halloween doesnt turn kids into liberals contrary to what Hannity claimed. I only have to show their idiocy because the voters are smart enough to know whats fact and whats bullsh*t to conclude whether or not the anchors making these claims are dumb as rocks. "The fact that people are in fact informed regardless of whether they are given false information proves that the average intelligence of a fox news anchor is greater than the intelligence of a rock. " Being wrong =/= intelligence. If I said that crab people are trying to use Paul Ryan to drive us into debt so that they could then kill us when we're weak that wouldnt = intelligence. "Their simple ability to project anything is what proves that they have an intelligence above that of a petrified matter"You claim that rocks cant project anything, however the fact that people have pet rocks show that rocks can respond to human behavior, be domesticated, socialize with other pet rocks, sniff each others poop, etc. shows they CAN project intelligence. ============================================================================Here are my final points:1) Rocks can show intelligence, be domesticated, be kept as pets, work in groups, etc that make them intelligent2) Fox News Anchors on average cannot show intelligence, as given by the video's above whose accuracy was not approved by the con3) The con has granted the moving of the ship to the intelligence of sand, however I have clarified that the rocks were moving them, therefore he must now attribute the intelligence of sand to that of rocks.4) The con has deliberately misquoted me5) The con has asked me to be funnier while not being funny at all6) Watching Fox News makes people more misinformed then people who dont watch fox news,rocks dont watch fox news but millions of Americans do,rocks are smarter then the average American. 7) I have given numerous sources showing the idiocy of the average Fox News Anchors and how their idiocy can even make other people turn into idiots8) The Con as made false claims about the college education of Fox News Anchors and who actually hosts Fox News shows. 9) Con has used sources written by Fox News that are blatantly false which is another example of how they misinform people.