Direct representation should be adopt for legislatures

Direct representation or proxy representation is a proposed form of representative democracy where Each Representative's vote is weighted in proportion to the number of Citizens who have chosen that Candidate to represent Them, in contrast to conventional forms of representative democracy such as the Winner-take-all system, where the Winner of a plurality of votes in a given district, party, or other grouping of Voters goes on to represent all Voters in that group, or the proportional representation system where the number of Representatives allotted to each party or political faction is in rough proportion to the number of Voters supporting each faction.Direct representation is an optimal compromise between pure direct democracy and conventional representative democracy, as legislative decisions will more closely reflect the pure will of the People yet will still be carried out by a "wise" group of informed and accountable elected Representatives. Direct representation removes the problem of district gerrymandering because the balance of power in a legislative body will be precisely the same regardless of where district lines are drawn. It also avoids disenfranchisement of slight minorities in cases where the electorate is split nearly evenly in its choice for representation, yet the preferred Representative of only one faction must be chosen to represent the entire Electorate of a party or district.Unlike direct democracy, Voters would not vote on legislation Themselves but rather elect Representatives to perform legislative duties on Their behalf, thus reducing the amount of time and energy the average Citizen has to spend thinking about and voting on specific legislation.Unlike representation determined by plurality or majority vote, every Voter in an election district has Their vote represented in the legislature regardless of whether or not Their choice won a plurality or majority of votes.Unlike proportional representation, each Voter votes for a specific representative to represent Them, rather than a political party. This provides Voters a wider range of nuance in political platforms to choose from, rather than simply having to choose between a relatively small number of "one-size-fits-all" parties. It also means even the smallest interests can be heard.Every vote is equal to every other vote.States' and districts' political power is proportional to the number of their Residents Who vote. This approach is more fair than representation by population because those in the population Who cannot or choose not to vote do not subsequently lend Their weight to Those in the state or district Who can and do. Hence, a state with a high Child-to-Adult ratio will not give each Voter more representational weight than a state with fewer Children per Adult, for example. The same is true for other Residents who are ineligible to vote, such as non-Citizen legal Residents, unauthorized Migrants, Prisoners, and convicted Felons. However, if this approach were considered unfair a scaling factor equal to the ratio of the total population of a state/district to the population of eligible Voters could be applied to Each Representative's voting weight.Because the majority of Voters in a district cannot be shut out of the process as in some plurality elections (where the winning Candidate falls short of majority support), coalition-building among non-plurality-Winners is possible and effective, both generally and on specific issues.