BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
God exists

I have been very busy over the last few days and I'm almost out of time, so this argument will be brief. I will proivde more evidence in round 4. You are basically telling me that God exists because his existance cannot be disproven. The obvious flaw in this argument is that this statement can be applied to almost anything. For example, I can tell you that there is a hippo in my backyard. There is no way to prove or disprove this statement, but we must assume that there is no hippo in by backyard since I have not provided evidence. Your argument proves that it is impossible to prove God's existence. Nearly your entire argument is composed of reasons why science can't be used as an authority over god. You didn't provide any evidence of God's existence. Why? Because it is impossible to provide evidence. You mention that there are some things science can't prove. Some of the examples you provide contain the ability to be proved by science (such as the benzene molecule), but technology isn't yet at the point to prove some of these concepts. You mention that love is unable to be observed. "Love" is an emotion and not a physical object, therefore it can't be tested in a physical sense. However, science can be used to measure brain waves and other patterns that symbolize love. Lastly, I would like to provide a brief argument of my own. I feel that Christianity is used as a defense mechanism against the fear of death, which is one of the most feared concepts among humans (sources will be provided later on). Christians believe that they will go to heaven when they die, and others (depending on the branch of christianity) will go to hell. This provides a "shield" against the fear of death, as Christians don't want to accept the eternal concept of dying. Again, there is no way to prove or disprove heaven or hell, therefore we can rightfully assume these places don't exist since there is no scientific evidence supporting them. In conclusion, my opponent didn't provide any evidence of God's existence, the topic of the debate, in the last round. Again, it is impossible to provide evdidence of God's existence, and I will happily rebut any response to this claim.
Microsoft is superior to Apple

How about Windows operated phones compared to IPhones. Name one truly great advancement in Apple technology with IPhones lets be honest Apple is not a master in tech but more advertisement. I mean really people only buy Apple products because Apple products are "in"and it's cool to be like everyone else. I don't see my opponent saying anything that Apple offers that Microsoft doesn't. And I believe that people who buy tablets do to the availability in apps aren't really using that tablet as an advantage for work in either, business, work, or school. I would like to further my argument that Apple doesn't really make changes with new products. I mean people just buy it to follow the trend. Why buy a new phone, computer, or tablet because it's bigger, or lighter, or now has clearer screen. I mean really Apple just changes little things about their products and leaves it to advertisement to try to show the importance of that change. Honestly I'm starting to think comparing serious work related Microsoft products to play products by Apple is much like comparing apples and oranges. Oh and what is that app again that Apple has Office and I forgot what company is that provided by? And other apps like Office but not Office are hard to use because of compatibility with other technology.
Microsoft is superior to Apple

Rebuttals: "I believe Microsoft is superior to Apple for a number of reasons one being technological advancement. Lets compare the IPad to the Surface" Pros only argument he's presenting so far is that the I pad is worse than the surface. However, just because one product may be inferior to another doesn't mean the entire company is worse. There are other factors that need to be considered that Pro has ignored, which I'll highlight later in my arguments for this rounds. "You cant use Microsoft Office on an IPad (which is pre installed on Surfaces at the time of purchase). You also can't save or make documents" The biggest problem for the new Surface is that Microsoft's Windows app store is still lackluster. There are a handful apps available for surface but they generally pale in comparison to what the I pad offers. On top of this, there's actually a free app for Microsoft office available. Microsoft used to make customers pay for this app but it's now free. On top of this, there's also other apps comparable to the Microsoft office available for free on the App Store. This obviously means that pro's point here is refuted. . http://www.theverge.com... Pro then goes on to list features that Microsoft office has. However, this is irrelevant because the I pad has many of these same features, such as the office app or a keyboard case. Pro also fails to highlight a single thing that the I pad has, focusing only on small features the "Surface" has available, making his arguments extremely misleading. He hasn't yet proven that the I pad is inferior and certainly has not yet proven that Microsoft is superior.
Microsoft is superior to Apple

I believe Microsoft is superior to Apple for a number of reasons one being technological advancement. Lets compare the IPad to the Surface. The IPad is an all play tablet. You cant use Microsoft Office on an IPad (which is pre installed on Surfaces at the time of purchase). You also can't save or make documents and it is barely compatible with other devices it doesn't even have a USB slot. A Surface has a Intel Core processor, stylus, a stand, magnetic attachable keyboard/cover, Microsoft Office, faster charging charger, mini SD slot, and lets not forget the mini HDMI slot. Now before you say it I'll say it if Microsoft is better then why isn't there more Microsoft products around then Apple products and the answer is because people are band wagoners and will buy anything that's in at the moment.
The ocean is not real, Its just blue wet air

OK i'm just going to be honest, I don't believe any of this, I am just trying to vote. Because that question is a serious question, I will answer it truthfully, NO. I believe life has meaning that most people don't even try to comprehend, And there are things which are sovereignly governed and done by God. And he has a plan for all with meaning in peoples lives. Anyway, Yes there is meaning, There is meaning, My last statement is 100% illogical. !
The ocean is not real, Its just blue wet air

When you eat food it is an allusion. Your body is simply accustomed to the allusion. When you feel like you are hungry its your mind reacting. It may feel like your stomach, But it is actually more of a mental reaction feeling physical. The ocean is fake because your mind us accustomed to the reality that it is real. If it is real, Why isn't theillunati a square. With this logic you can achieve anything. I rest my case:)
The ocean is not real, Its just blue wet air

So, Let me put this in another example with clearer terms. If I were to eat food, I wouldn't be eating food. That food would be just an illusion to me. But, You need food to live, And cleary, You can swallow and physically touch food and since people aren't dying from "food illusions" must'nt that mean objects that you can touch, (physical) that they aren't illusions? And if thats true (which it is), Wouldn't that mean the ocean is not an illusion?
Animal testing s should be banned.

It's just one's choice. I mean it is different kind of matter. In my opinion, animal experiments are not unnecessary. Think about this. If a experiment finished successfully, then who is the first person? Is it also safe for people? Even a new medicine is proved by animals, will people believe this medicine directly? I am pretty sure it is not good for everyone. If people believe and use the results of experiment after animal experiments, it was effective and useful for our medical system. I mean it's worth, but now the fact is not.
Animal testing s should be banned.

I agree with 'Animal testing'. It is necessary experiments for human. What if we don't do 'Animal testing' ?? . Which organism will be the subject of experiment ? Sacrifices can be during experiments. But, it will save more lifes. It must be valueable sacrifices. That animals are fed to experiment, which is similar to meat. If we ban 'Animal testing', that must work to meat in same way too.
The Rights of the victim should take precedence over the rights of the accused in felony cases

I affirm: The Rights of the Victim should take precedence over the rights of the accused in felony cases For analysis of the resolution I offer the following observations: 1. The question in the resolution is not over the presumption of innocence. The resolution is questioning the prioritization of rights. 2. A felony case is different then a misdemeanor case. Therefore, we are talking about egregious crimes, such as rape, murder, kidnapping. Value: Justice Value Criterion: Maintaining Culpability Justification: A value of justice is implied in the resolution since we are discussing punishment and rights in a court system. Thus, that legal system ought to be just. Maintaining Culpability achieves justice because the only way to properly allocate due is to make a distinction between the legally innocent and legally culpable. If there was no distinction, then justice could not be allocated, and thus there would be no need for a legal system. Contention I: Prioritizing Rights When rights come into conflict it is an obligation of any legal system to prioritize the rights of the victim/innocent over the culpable. If the legal system does not prioritize these rights first, then the government has created equality between the culpable and innocent. From this act, there is no legal or moral distinction between the two, thus there is no need for a legal system.
Is one direction the best band in the world

No, One Direction is not the "best" band in the world. Voices full of autotune, they are nothing but products of a materialistic world fueled by screaming preteen girls. Their fame lives on while the voices of many good indie/alternative bands who are AUTHENTIC and not autotuned drowned voices is not even recognized. Yes I like One Direction and their music but they are barely the "best" band in the world
The value 1.999999... is equal to 2.

1.999999...repeating is not equal to 2. JustCallMeTarzan said that his mathematical proof establishes that he is correct. However, as one should know, mathematicians are, on basis, educated people. If mathematicians are on average a quite educated group of people, why would they have made two numbers of the same value without purpose? Until JustCallMeTarzan provides a purpose for which mathematicians would make two numbers of the same value, the CON side will prevail.
The value 1.999999... is equal to 2.

This is in response to the numerous 1 = 2 posts with the mathematical error. ****************************************** Let A = 1.99999999... repeating. 10 * A = 19.999999... repeating. Subtract A from each side... 10A - A = 18.0 9A = 18.0 Divide by 9. A = 2 Substitute. 1.9999999... repeating = 2.
Participation Trophy.

A certificate for both, a trophy for the victor is how i see it, back when i was in grade school, they looked at the grades of all the students, i had the 3rd best grades, i got a "diploma" which was basically saying "hey, you passed, here is your certificate" the 2nd place got the diploma and a silver medal, the 1st place got a trophy, gold medal and diploma, so i studied harder, the next year i was 1st place, the fact i didn't win made me work harder to be the best there is, and i want my kids to be even better than me, the lowest grade among the 3 is b+ and with my son Johnathon and me loving baseball, we decided to do it, and when he lost, he showed me the trophy and told me "Dad, i didn't earn it, let us take it back" i knew it was his team that made him lose but his team didn't earn it so neither did he, so of course we got some ice cream, so, tomorrow we are going to practice extra hard for next year, his loss makes him want to try harder, to put another trophy on the shelf.
Participation Trophy.

I will agree with my opponent that these trophies do seem to "give children the wrong message" about winning and losing, but we have to put into perspective how these are just children receiving these trophies. They shouldn't be pressured to care about whether they win or lose. Additionally, I find that participation trophies can benefit children.I personally believe that, as long as these children are given the opportunity to socialize, enjoy playing, and to get physical exercise, I see no problem with rewarding participants with a little participation trophy or certificate. Writer of the New York Times, Parker Abat, says "Self-esteem is a big part of one’s childhood. Watching a peer receive a trophy and not receiving one yourself can be degrading. Any kind of honor can make a young kid feel as if he or she meant something to the team, and that could boost the child’s self-confidence," (S1). Participation Trophies also teach children about the importance of commitment and acts as compensation for their devotion to both the sport and their efforts in trying as best as they can to win. Allison Slater Tate, mother of four and editor of "Club Mid at Scary Mommy," feels participation trophies teach a worthwhile lesson: “There is something to teaching kids that it is worth keeping a commitment, that we value this. Winning and losing is not a lesson that kids need to search out to find. It’s everywhere. But they also need to learn how important it is that everyone shows up,” (S2).Sources:S1) http://www.nytimes.com...S2) http://www.today.com...
should spongbob be banned please. yes or no because its really inappropiate

Dimwit literally just means a silly person which Patrick and spongebob actually are. And the episode with the cursing is just one of hundreds plus it was censored. Everyone will eventually be exposed to curse words anyways whether through family, friends, school, etc. Now since you mentioned it should be replaced by dragon ball z it really shouldn't under your way of thinking. Don't get me wrong I love that show but it is filled with violent scenes, a lot more cursing, and is overall less suitable for kids
should spongbob be banned please. yes or no because its really inappropiate

No. It is one of my favorite shows even today (I'm 15 turning 16 soon). Anyways its 2018, the world is filled by edgy kids and crude jokes. But on a serious note kids have access to a lot more inappropriate things than a children's show for example on YouTube there are videos like the recent Jake Paul video where he shows a person that committed suicide. There are also many other websites not suitable for children like porn hub. Not to mention millions of kids play violent video games like Call Of Duty, GTA, Assassin's Creed, and many more. In today's world it doesn't really matter if a kid is exposed to a few rude jokes he/ she doesn't even know the meaning of. Again I've watched it ever since I was a little kid and honestly I turned out fine
private schools should be cheaper

I think that we should all go to private schools so that we can all get the best education we need to make this world better. look at all the politics there making heaps of money but how many went to a public school. if we made private schools cheaper everyone could have a better future. if your parents couldn't afford to send you to a private school would you think that it should be cheaper ? would you think "oh teachers need to make a living" or would you think that's unfair I want to go there? what would your truthful opinion be?
private schools should be cheaper

Private schools are supposed to be teaching kids closer up. Public schools do it for free in a classroom that's almost the same size. Honestly, I think that going to a public school is better than going to a private school in general because you have more social activity and can also get personal help there. But if a person is set on going to a private school, they should remember that everyone must make a living, even the teachers at the private school. Not as many people go to private schools as do public schools, and therefore the teachers may end up making slightly less money. Indeed, in most places, money for public schools comes from taxes paid by the people of the town. Private schools are different because they're more personal.
A Zombie Apocalypse Is completely Possible

The time it takes cordyceps to evolve will be thousands of years at least. by this time, we will have amazing technology at our fingertips. This includes computers that have a memory and CPU more powerful than all of humanity combined. this would be their equivalent of a laptop. In fact, futurists can very accurately predict when the computational power of the earth will double. Also, to imagine the power of these computers, the most powerful computer today is only a bit more powerful than the average human brain. So brains are already very powerful. in this distant future, there are probably even one hundred billion people spread out over this star cluster. So the power of these computers is more than all of those already remarkable minds. Today, biologists use very powerful computers to figure out how to give us the right antibodies for any kind of disease. Therefore, by the time those cordyceps evolve, we will already have a vaccine. Those neurotoxins from blowfish you talked about are produced by the Fugu fish. These fish do cause temporary brain death, but the victim awakens completely normal other than the fact that they missed a few years. Plus, brain death is when your brain shuts off yet a special part of your brain, the brain stem, is still functional. The brain stem is in control of the body's unconscious activities such as the heart, digestion and others. When the rest of the brain is shut off, the body will eventually run out of energy in a matter of weeks and run out of water in a matter of days. To combat this, a victim of this blowfish is put under life support equipment, given nutrients intravenously and is under constant watch to ensure they don't wake up and are trapped in their hospital bed. In round 2 I failed to notice that you also mentioned a man made version of the Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. This does not matter because it was made by MAN in the United States of America. The scientists here are very, very, very, careful when handling these substances. There precautions include sealing the containers in clear plastic tubes instead of glass, keeping the tubes inside rooms with password activated locks, steel walls, bullet-proof windows, and airtight sealing to provide a 0% chance of contaminating the outside world.
A Zombie Apocalypse Is completely Possible

In the case that cordycepts does infact evolve to humans it still falls under the topic of zombification only because It can happen at a later date. Also my opponent forgot to go against my other possibiltys of zombification, such as Nerotoxins, an example of a Nerotoxin is the Japanese blowfish which can cause the body to go into a near death state and only be revived by certain chemicals which renders them brain dead and allows them to use there body functionally.in cultures such as in Haiti the have preformed this ritual before in these of voodoo. Neurogenesis and Nanobots. Which have all been proven to promote a zombie apocalypse. There for because my opponent failed to go against my points thus allowing the affirmative to win the debate.
A Zombie Apocalypse Is completely Possible

I agree that the cordyceps will evolve and I agree that the Creutzfeldt"Jakob disease is a possibility, but if you look at the fact that evolution takes HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS to change that much. Also, you forgot to mention that the Creutzfeldt"Jakob disease is a prion disease and therefore doesn't evolve at all since they are just proteins. Even though patients do experience zombie like symptoms, the disease only infects 1 person for every million people in select countries. The best reason why the Creutzfeldt"Jakob disease will not become next zombie apocalypse is that it you get it like any prion disease. by eating human brain tissue which frankly, never was popular even among cannibalistic societies. Still, the ones that did built up an immunity to this disease and that is a possible vaccine for this disease that already can't make a zombie apocalypse.
A Zombie Apocalypse Is completely Possible

According to http://www.bbc.co.uk... There are over 400 different types of cordyscepts. Each type of cordycepts infects a different spices. Which could possibly mean that according to the theory of Evolution it could infect evolve to infect humans. Mass cannibalism has never been recorded and only small groups or singular people would commit cannibalism and cannibalism is preformed by people today. According to nbcnews.com(1) it is rare but still preformed today also pirons is NOT the only thing that makes people perform cannibalism. There is many different causes to cannibalism and it has also been preformed in Western civilization. Since I do believe the term "zombie" has been modified from the last round I'm going throw in this: Science has proved there to be different diseases that cause zombie like symptoms such as and not limited to Brain Parasites, Nerotoxins, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Neurogenesis (reanimation) and, Nanobots. Now the last two may sound extremely fictional but they are plausible. There is a lab that is dedicated to research on Neurogenesis is happening and just realty Scientists have already created a nano-cyborg, by fusing a tiny silicone chip to a virus. The first thing they found out is these cyborgs can still operate for up to a month after the death of the host. Notice how nano scientists went right for zombification, even at this early stage. (2) 1-http://www.nbcnews.com... 2-http://www.cracked.com...
A Zombie Apocalypse Is completely Possible

Those zombie fungi are too delicate and weak to even a mile away to even threaten a human being. This is because those fungi target ANTS, FISH and BIRDS. The only real threat of the zombie apocalypse is if prions, an unstable protein that you can get from cannibalizing brain tissue, becomes too abundant in one's system. Even so our body has built up an IMMUNITY to these proteins. Even if this immunity didn't exist, all of the people who have died of this protein have stayed dead. Even so the number of cannibals and the location of those cannibals are too far away from western civilization to spread. Even so most cannibals eat muscle tissue so that leaves very, very, very little to start a zombie apocalypse and, with all of the awareness and research done on the simulations of the zombie apocalypse that the chance of a successful zombie apocalypse is reduced to zero.
A Zombie Apocalypse Is completely Possible

In the case of the Zombies being undead, the human body decays twice as fast in the air. Decomposition also occurs faster in different temperate zones. For example; in the tropics a dead body would become a mass of maggots in 24 hours. The flesh and muscle tissue would inevitably decompose to a point of not being able to move the bones around and to a point of were the limbs would fall off. It all depends on the temperate zone of were the body is. My best guess is around 1 year and then it will be all over. I do honestly believe that it is fully possible whether it be due to a fungus (cordysepts) or, a virus.