atheism and theism are false by default

"atheism=disbelief(believe that my claim is false)=belief(believe that my claim is true)=theism" No, oh my god, you don't even understand the definition of disbelief. Disbelief is the refusal to believe something is true. Atheism is the Disbelief or Lack of Belief in God or Gods. You are simply remolding definitions to fit your view, which is god awfully wrong. "beyond what i know is what i dont know, only know is true. know=physical experience=now" Once more, convoluted clauses that are nonsensical. Difficult to understand and have no real point. "reality is cause and effect, cause and effect is logic. if you are human... close your eyes and read on to prove im wrong""no disbelief is in no way non belief.. you can believe my claim that i am wearing a hat, or beleive that i am not wearing a hat, 2 options, and the third option is i accept i dont know" You only continue to prove me right. "right... if you dont believe you dont believe.. but disbelieve my claim and you are literally calling me a lier" No. Disbelieving your claim is refusing to believe a claim that has no evidence to back it, like God. Therefor we don't believe there is a God. It isn't a belief and it isn't claiming you are a liar. "if you disbelieve my claim, that i can fly, you believe that i can not fly, except you might be able to know other things here.. basicly you are implying disbelief dosnt exist. what is your positon on my claim that i am wearing a hat, if you believe that i am not?" Already addressed this enough in my last post. You are running in circles at this point. By your logic, disbelieving means you believe claim is false. By agnosticism, you believe you do not know and believe you should sit on the fence and not make a logical choose via rational thought. So, you killed your own entire argument. "unknown is non sense""all my arguments and claims are absolute, can never be defeated" You defeated yourself. You basically have agreed with me more than once. If they can't be defeated, it's because they are so convoluted that they make no sense. "truth is knowledge, i have no knowledge of the future, no memory. past=memory" Knowledge isn't memory if that is what you claim. "i know my experience of now, i know god is false." You know God is false, therefor you are an atheist, hardcore at that. You are literally agreeing with me on the stance and showing, by your logic, it is logical to be an atheist, otherwise you kind of kill yourself knowingly accepting an illogical stance. You know God is false (you do not), therefor you are a gnostic atheist. Thank you. "i have no beliefs, belief=false, know=true" Neither do atheist on the aspect of God. And you do have a belief, a quite deluded one at that, because you claim too know God is false. You have no evidence, therefor it is a claim, a belief. "Belief: An acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists." So not only to do blatantly accept the stance you claim is "false" by default and is a belief, you accept and come out saying you are that stance and have no belief. You also misuse the words of the dictionary to suit your own illogical, ill-rational, sophomoric, asinine, convoluted claims and clauses all around. You have both, in this debate, agreed and disagreed at the same time. Congratulations, you won the internet. "votes determine nothing" They do actually. They do not determine reality, but they determine how your skill is at a debate and how your rhetoric is wrong or not. It shows you have been called on only to continue blatantly parroting information. "metaphysical=mental=nothing=0" You do not seem to even understand what metaphysical is. "physical=something=1" This isn't math, and you are not using mathematics to support yourself very well. "what test could be suffisient for you to make in order for you to know that i am wearing a hat right now, but you still can at best imagine it? how about looking at a live video feed? do you know it then?" Look up the scientific method. I am not going to spout how I can experiment, it doesn't matter so long as I can follow the method. It's self explanatory on ways one can do it. "i am certain when i remember correctly, and certain when i am in doubt and i have to fill the blanks with imaginary ideas""science is a religion, as it relys on confirmation from machines. also i can at best beleive what others tell me, unless i dont have to imagine it" As one who studies physics, no. It's not a religion, you again have no actual idea what definitions of words mean. You simply take religion based on a belief, a belief based on claims with no evidence and blind acceptance. That isn't science. Science is following methods to determine how the world works. Claiming it is a religion shows you have no idea what science is. No one worships science, no one prays too science, no one believes science, what science says comes from humans experimenting and uncovering things. They change all the time when needed. No, it doesn't rely on confirmation from machines. And even if it completely did, that doesn't make it a religion. You don't understand how the machinery with scientific experiments even work. "god=information" No it doesn't. "atheism is 100 percent can only be false in any case forever" What? Doesn't matter, you have already agreed with me and disagreed. Completely contradicting yourself left and right. Points extended.