Daenerys Targaryen should win the IRON THRONE

Rebuttals of Pro's argumentsPro makes the following main arguments:DragonsWhilst it is true that dragons are a fearsome military asset, they can only be used effectively if they can be sufficiently controlled. But with Daenerys, it seems that she cannot actually control her dragons (1). Hence, even if dragons are powerful enough to assist in the taking of the Iron Throne, they cannot be controlled by Daenerys.NumbersWhilst it is true that Daenerys has more men than Stannis, and probably more capable men in the form of the Unsullied, this would only enable Daenerys to seize the Iron Throne, but they are a non-renewable resource so whether she would be able to hold it for a sustained period of time is doubtable. Daenerys will not train more Unsullied because she is morally opposed to the training program. The implications of this is that Daenerys can only rely on her unsullied for 20 more years at the most, at which point they will be too old to live up to their military might.This DebateI maintain that this debate is about who should win the Iron Throne, not who is most likely to. Taking this into account, the factors pertaining to the debate resolution are mainly to do with the quality of the ruler and ability to rule.True, the resolution says 'win', but if we are talking about who should win, we are talking about what is the best result and what ought to happen. Otherwise the debate would be worded: 'Daenerys Targaryen will win the Iron Throne'.Defence of ArgumentsStannis & the WallMy point wasn't that Stannis is best placed to defend against the threat beyond the Wall - it was saying that Stannis has the right priorities. He rightly prioritises the defence of the realm above his personal quest for Kingship. This is an admirable trait that infers he would be a good ruler.The argument concerning dragons assumes that said dragons can be controlled, yet all the evidence suggests otherwise.Stannis & justiceI know that Stannis is probably responsible for Renly's death, but this does not refute the point that Stannis is just.Renly was committing treason by claiming the Throne to be his, and refusing to obey his rightful King (Stannis). The punishment for treason is death (2), and so death is what he got. This is an example of Stannis being just - he shows that even family members are not exempt from the law.Stannis's InheritancePro's argument is self-refuting. She states that Daenerys has the rightful claim because Robert took the Throne not by rightful inheritance, but by force. But this would also discredit the Targaryen claim, since Aegon the Conqueror took control of the Seven Kingdoms by force as well. We could go further back, and discredit the Andal claim to the throne since they invaded and took power from the First Men. The eventual result would be that only the First Men and their descendants are entitled to the Throne, in which case Brandon Stark is the rightful King (since the Starks are the only major family that is descended from the First Men (3)).So, unless Bran is actually the rightful heir to the Throne, we cannot go back to previous dynasties to determine the rightful heir, we can only do so by looking within the current dynasty, which is the Baratheon one. Hence Stannis is the rightful King.Stannis and military successTrue, Stannis did lose at the Blackwater, but the odds were very much stacked against him (with the largest castle in the Seven Kingdoms on one side, and near the entire military might of both House Tyrell and Lannister on the other). Not even Randyll Tarly, arguably the most able commander in Westeros, could have won in those circumstances. (1) A Dance with Dragons, Chapter 36(2) A Storm of Swords, Chapter 36(3) A Game of Thrones, Chapter 1(4) A Feast for Crows, Chapter 7