polygamy better than monogamy

Thank you for responding. I would like to point out Pro's underdeveloped refutations and arguments. Now, let's begin:1] what would happen to those kids who are born as a result of those intercourse. not all couple prefer birth control or single parent hood. There is such thing as abortion, however that is a different debate altogether. Pro's refutation does not make any sense. He simply believes that by saying "not all couples prefer birth control or single parent hood" that he has effectively refuted my claim. However, that is a weak refutation, a cheap shot, if you will. That is essentially saying: "Not all couples prefer monogamy" and expecting to win the debate. Which is ridiculous. Yes, not all prefer birth control, but that is only a small minority. If you look here: . http://www.cdc.gov...it says, "Between 2006–2008, 99% of women who had ever had sexual intercourse had used at least one method of birth control. " Obviously, then, most people would use birth control, thus this renders your refutation ineffective.2] not all couple prefer adoption. Again with the "not all" fallacy. This is not a valid proof. If a couple wants a child badly enough, they would adopt. Again, if you look here: . http://www.childwelfare.gov...it says: "In 2007 and 2008, approximately 136,000 children were adopted annually in the United States. This represents a 6-percent increase in adoptions since 2000 and a 15-percent increase since 1990 (Flango & Flango, 1995)" So, in fact, adoption is becoming more and more popular. Thus, your refutation is ineffective again.3] but that won't satisfy every people. some people may be happy. all may not. Again Pro makes this fallacy and fails to back it up with proof. In Pro's first contention, he says "it will help those father who have more than one daughter. all of their daughter could marry the same man and may live together. "By saying this, he assumes that the daughters want to live together, and as Pro says, it "won't satisfy every people. some people may be happy. all may not. " Therefore there is a contradiction in this argument and Pro's argument is invalid.4] but now there is competition among wife and mistress. it is worse than competition among wives. Please, explain how it is worse. Furthermore, elaborate on what you mean by mistress.5] then there would be cross community/culture marriage. Pro responds to my shortage of women point with this weak refutation. This does not solve anything. If polygamy is as good as you say, everyone would practice polygamy on a larger scale. Then, there wouldn't be enough spouses for everyone. Cross community/culture marriage would not solve anything, as there is a shortage of women in those cultures and communities as well. I would like to bring up one new argumentC.3: Polygamy is IllegalIf you look here: . http://en.wikipedia.org...on the chart on the right, it indicates explicity where polygamy is legal. Polygamy is illegal almost world wide, and is only legal in developing countries like Kenya. Therefore, if you practice polygamy, you can get arrested. As a result, polygamy is not better than monogamy. ConclusionPro has failed to respond to many of my contentions in this debate. For example, he failed to respond to my "competition, stress, and violence among children" subpoint, and many more. Furthermore, Pro provides weak refutations without proof to support his outrageous claims expecting those to be valid. They are not valid. By Pro's logic, I can say, "Not all couples prefer polygamy, so monogamy is better", which is ridiculous. As a result, Pro has flawed logic and reasoning in all of his arguments and refutations.