Science provides indisputable proof that God formed all Life on Earth, failing to prove otherwise

I welcome your enthusiastic acceptance of this debate and am quite confident that it will be an enlightening experience. First we must address some misinterpretations on your part. Your acceptance of debate constitutes an agreement to abide by all rules set forth unless discussions occur where participants come to reasonable deviations as defined by mutual consent! So your preening shall be ignored as you have no legitimate position with which to accept or refuse to participate in the manner prescribed by guidelines. No discussions were entered into so ". You don"t get to say or define, squat! You made no request for exceptions, so none shall be granted! First: Your Statement of Position: invalid and unnecessary you are Con, that is clearly one who is against! Second: Objective Claim? You accepted based upon debates parameters- This may reasonably infer, imply, or allude to acceptance in its entirety. Thus you are in violation of rule 4-Off-Topic and your statement must be ignored and excluded from vote requirements. I have no need to converse with you beyond proofs and minor opinions, which help to clarify a statement, and then only on the grounds that such statement is necessary to assist you in an interpretive fashion. You are welcome to address anyone you wish in comments section, but in Debate, you address just me! If I need clarification you can trust I will ask you in comments section otherwise keep your opinions off the main debate page as much as possible. (to prevent lengthy and frequent violations of Rules.) *note* You are allowed opinion, but not assertions or claims, which require proof in keeping with standards. * It is my hopes for an eye opening debate from you. For this cause the rules are as they are. We shall employ the KISS method ". Keep It Simple Stupid. Your Response to opponents Argument: You accepted debate based on rules, and guidelines. You will answer questions and proofs given you that are within guidelines, The option for you to not do so must coincide with debate parameters, or you will be removed from debate for violation of rules! You do not get to choose what you will or will not answer unless it is in clear violation of Rules or guideline, this is MY Debate! You accepted. Abide by the agreed upon rules. Example of not in keeping with guidelines and or rules expanded as provided by Your Statement of position. 1.Made Claim against Pro statement: a.Off topic- topic is proofs of lack of scientific physical evidence against Biblical text.(rule 4) b.You claim does not lend itself to debate subject, but veers off to Pro? (rule 4) c.Opinionated Claim, but was impossible to provide required proofs for a claim, Con should thus have avoided this statement altogether which lent itself to required necessity of evidence. Item#2 You accepted debate based on Premises not headings, it was your responsibility to presume nothing but to ask any questions prior to acceptance if you failed to do this that is your problem not mine. I will of course allow you to remove yourself from debate at any time out of common courtesy. I do not believe you wish to remove yourself and as such will proceed accordingly. Please advise me in comments section or personal message should I be mistaken! ****The debate parameters are going to make it extremely difficult not to violate rules should either of us get into lengthy discussions. I realize that you will feel the need to defend your case before the masses. If you chose this route, that is entirely your choice, but I will be keeping track of violations and promptly request your removal for continuous acts of breech of Rule or Guidelines!**** Now we shall dispense with other shall we say, Ohhhh, Ohhhh, Ahhhhhhah unnecessary shenanigans And begin debate; Premise#1: Formation of Life must have been by supernatural formation as defined in scripture: All animal, mammal, Human, Insect, Bird and Plant life, form only in one way: Egg or Seed Premise #2 There is no scientific way shown for life to have formed through any natural construct, by accident or otherwise. ie ... Plants MUST start as seed, BUT must have ADULT PLANT to produce seed! Premise#3 There is no scientific data of photographic evidence in the entirety of scientific literature to provide realistic or possible paradigm for the formation of ADULT, plants, animals, birds, insects, amphibians, crustaceans or mammals that were needed to begin the reproductive process! Evidence: Report- http://users.rcn.com... http://video.nationalgeographic.com... Evidence: Report-https://en.wikipedia.org...: Fly"s http://www.bing.com... Requirement for Fish and birds to reproduce: http://www.bing.com... Requirements for amphibians to produce: http://www.bing.com... Requirement for insect reproduction: http://www.bing.com... Plants: http://www.pbslearningmedia.org... Basic animal reproduction: https://www.cevmultimedia.com... This substance of this debate is not one of casual increase of knowledge but is being specifically directed to induce an earnest desire on your part to contemplate a very real fact as shown in countless videos readily available on internet, dvd"s etc" That Life should not exist at all, in fact could not exist at all based on the requirements of all known reproductive paradigms? Bold statement to be sure ". However, upon investigation, readily available upon the internet, as defined by all available media life cycles form seed to plant ->to seed etc. egg to human, ->or mammal, ->or insect, ->or amphibian-> or crustacean depending on which species egg it is. Impossible because to get an egg or seed, required an adult specimen to provide the egg, or adult plant to provide the seed. The videos above attest to the fact of this is the paradigm in all life forms. Egg->infant->adult. Seed-> germination-> plant there are no exceptions. Then life should not exist, but does. How can this be explained by any known construct save one " the supernatural. Impossible occurrence as life existing where it should not lies squarely in the Biblical Text. Like or not it is the only feasible, logical, rational, plausible in relation to all other known theories it is the only one that accurately reflects the necessary requirements which adequately answers all questions within the context of existence. Or is it feasible, rational, logical or plausible, that "..that what? We are here but should not be by any natural means known to mankind! Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. We do have the biblical text which explains our creation ".. it readily states the created including man as adult specimens ". This answers availability of adult specimens for egg productions? This answers availability of Plants for seed production? Or do we just continue to ignore facts.