should japan be allowed to rearm with nuclear arms

Dude this is sloppy make your stuff more spaced out and copy and paste the points your attacking because this is a confusing mess to read I gave you a pointer lol. Anyway Your case::: 1: my opponent makes style and personal attacks in the rebuttal he just gave he only proves that the US is not fit to control baese if we act the way he did. For one what's Baese? and personal attacks? yeah you started the personal attacks first with the comments like: 1. by my opponents logic we should have been nuked by Brittan cause we beat them but we have an alliance with them now( huh that's odd aint it) This comment at the end was not needed and was insulting because you were acting like I was an idiot now if this last part wasn't here id have no problem and would not have made personal attacks. Also this has no bearing on the debate. 2: he took my first argument in the second rebuttal wrong what I was saying is that military action doesn't make a country crazy I don't remember saying they were crazy what I was saying is that giving a nuclear weapon to a country that has been controlled and attack by the U.S is not a very safe idea. Seeing how we killed thousands of innocent people as well as soldiers with the atomic bomb while they only attacked a military target in pearl harbor. I can see a country holding a grudge that long. Americans still hold a grudge on Nazi's and the holocaust, even today if we find a former Nazi in America we send them to prison or give them the death penalty and that my friend was 65 years ago. Nazi soldiers were not exactly bad people they just followed orders liking it or not they had no choice. Either way I'm just saying you underestimate societies holding grudges. 3. he didn't answer the economy argument made in rebuttal 2 which says that Japan will hold the alliance because of what we have don for them. Objection! I don't see a need to because you have no sources to back you up . 4. he also dropped my solvency for Japan secnairo so even if they get out of hand we will politically handle them no risk of war on his only ! well he did but he made an argument that made no sense C: Again you assume Japan having nukes will solve the problem yet our nukes in the U.S are not deterring them yeah very big hole there. if he spent more time answering this he might have won who is "them" Do us a favor don't act dumb it very obvious that I was referring to the countries this topic is about namely North Korea and China If the U.S's nukes don't scare them why would Japans? 5 the question was not weither this could be done rather should it happen my opponet is trying to take this debate to different context by his treaty if he wants to debate if i could happen he can meet me after class What are you talking about, im arguing it should not be done and can't and class? what i don't understand? 6 arguement 1 can and should be disregaurded Good it should. 8 B; if a gun is pointed in your face and your told not to do something you wont do it therefore deterence just with a nuke. Yes but you don't think China and North Korea don't have nukes too? Because we know North Korea does now your example only works if the other doesn't have a nuke but they both will have nukes. Example: one guy with a gun and another with a gun all i see is a shoot out waiting to happen. 9 vote pro; even if you give him crazy japan secenario we solve with c in the secound part because the pro holds alot more ! and they are more probable then japan going crazy after years of peace WWII ended 65 years ago most people to hold a grudge are dead or to old to serve Ok the word crazy never was used in my arguments if i was japanese i would be insulted by your comments not mine because your trying to make me look like a racist and i find that insulting. All im saying is if the possiblity exists then we should not give them a WMD, Also this would go against our efforts as the U.S to reduce Nuclear weapons. This is one thing that is certain making more nukes is not helping us reduce them. Also i Said The U.S's nukes are not deterring "them" which is North Korea and China which my opponents reason for giving them nukes. why would giving nukes to Japan change that? Simple put it won't theres no reason to its a waste of time resources and money.