The Bible Teaches We Don't Have to Keep the Weekly Sabbath

My opponent quotes Matthew 5:17 and later on says "Another common misrepresentations Christians make here is he fulfilled the law, but firstly you don't fulfill law, you fulfill prophecy." Does Matthew 5:17 say that Jesus fulfilled only prophecy but not the law? Here was Con's own quote: Matthew 5: 17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish THEM but to fulfill THEM." Here Jesus says he came to fulfill BOTH the law and the prophets, he fulfilled them both, which contradicts Con's claim that "you don't fulfill law." Jesus said he came to fulfill the law and the prophets. When a prophecy is fulfilled it becomes a thing of the past, no longer requiring application, similarly, when Jesus fulfilled the significance of the law he moved such law out of the way, making them unnecessary. For example, by becoming the Lamb of God that takes away our sin by his death, Jesus became our Passover, fulfilling the significance of the Passover lamb. (John 1:29; 1 Corinthians 5:7) Christians no longer need to obey the law requiring the Passover sacrifice because Jesus already fulfilled its significance. The law was only a shadow pointing to Christ, but now that the law has led us to Christ we are no longer under that law. (Hebrews 10:1: Galatians 3:23-25) Matthew 5:18 "One jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, TILL all [all what? the law] be filfilled." Jesus is saying that the law will not pass away until it is fulfilled, Jesus said in verse 17 that he came to fulfill it, if Jesus didn't fulfill it then he failed in his mission. If he did fulfill it, then it is done away with, for it will not pass TILL it is fulfilled, and it has been. "Now I admit other authors of the bible may contradict this, but he asked if the bible teaches Christians should obey the law, then Matthew is part of the bible and it should be kept." The title of this debate is "the Bible teaches we don't have to keep the weekly sabbath," so even if Con could show that the Bible teaches we must keep it, he still hasn't taken down my evidence that the Bible teaches we don't have to keep it; all he has done so far is attempt to show that the Bible contradicts itself. But showing that the Bible also teaches to keep the law doesn't overturn the evidence that the Bible teaching the law has been abolished. Until Con deals with the evidence I presented him that the law of Moses is abolished, he has not won this debate and you should vote Pro. Further, what Jesus said at Matthew 5:17-19 was before the law of Moses was abrogated at the cross, so this law was still in effect at that time and therefore people had to keep it, but Jesus is saying it would only be in effect UNTIL it is fulfilled in him! Romans 10:4 shows Christ is the end of the law, hence, it has been fulfilled. "Lets a look at a couple of things. Firstly what is the law we are referring to. Well since Jesus was a Jew that would be the Torah." The law of Moses given to the Israelites at Sinai. (John 1:17; Acts 13:39) My opponent has not responded to my initial argument that the Bible teaches the law with its sabbath requirement has been removed, so this evidence still stands, and if this is true, then the Bible does teach that we don't have to keep the sabbath cause this law is not in effect. I will therefore repost my initial argument to Con and await his reply: The Sabbath is a shadow of Christ (Col 2:16-17), and Christians don't live in the sahdows, we live in the reality. Jesus has put an end to the law of Moses with its sabbath requirement (Col 2:14; Eph 2:15), hence, Christians are not under the law. (Gal 5:18; Rom 6:14). We have freedom of choice in this matter of holydays, we can esteem everyday alike if we want (Rom 14:5). Paul even warned his brothers against being caught up in the observance of days as thought there were some law to do so. (Gal 4:10-11). Immediately after saying that Christians were delivered from the law, what example from the law does Paul cite? "Thou shalt not covet," the tenth commandment, showing that the decalogue was included in that law from which they were freed. (Rom 7:6-7) In 2 Corinthians 3:7 he speaks of the decalogue as being gorious, then in verse 11 he says that which was glorious was done away with. To make sure he meant the decalogue he tells us that it was written in stone, and reminds us of the occasion when Moses came down the mountain with the tablets in his hands. (vss 7, 13; see Exo 34:29-35) Hebrews 8:6-9:4 informs us that the old covenant, the decalogue, is replaced by a better covenant; that ends the sabbath day! There is no command under the New Covenant for Christians to keep the sabbath, and even those who keep it cannot prove which days is the seventh day on which they should keep it. Which day did Jesus die? Which day was he resurrected? Which day was the seventh-day sabbath? They can't prove these things, which merely indicates that the day cannot be that important, otherwise God would have furnished them with proof! I look forwards to hearing my opponent in this matter.