The "Seinfeld" gang did not deserve jail

"It would only be a break of law if he didn't pay the fine, which I'm sure he did because no where in the show after that season did that haunt him again."By that logic, I could kill someone, pay a fine, serve fifty years, and I wouldn't have broken a law. It's the same exact logic on a much smaller scale."The marble rye incident, technically that would be more like shoplifting than something serious, because, it's not like he raped or got violent with her, he just took it from her."Last time I checked, theft is still a crime."And the overdue library book: he paid it."Like I said before, that doesn't make it not a crime."As for the first one, it was only Kramer giving a used wheelchair that was used against them in court, not the handicaped parking, so that doesn't count."Just because that was the only part addressed in court doesn't mean the other crime didn't occur. Reminder: The gang only served time for breaking the Good Samaritan law. They were not locked up for their petty childish behavior; the judge only encouraged them to reflect on it. In the first round, you merely said that you'd try to prove that the four "did not break any laws," which is untrue. Trying to prove that those crimes did not factor into their sentence is useless; of course they didn't. The show never suggested they did."The other case, the limo, wasn't mentioned either, so it doesn't count."Same response."Actually Marcelino was the one responsible for the cockfighting..."Was Marcelino also responsible for Kramer showing up to the cockfight, watching it, and participating in it? That's still illegal."I don't remember Kramer ever being accused of mail fraud..."In the episode, "The Package," Kramer sent an insured package to Jerry, which contained a broken stereo, with the intent of getting the insurance money (1). Again: Just because it was not addressed in court does not mean a crime was not commited."...smoking Cuban cigars is not illegal."Sorry, let me rephrase: It is illegal to buy or own Cuban cigars in the United States, both of which Kramer did."It's messed up, but hey, it's not illegal."Private recipes are private property. (2) She stole the recipe. She screwed the Soup Nazi illegally."In saying that (they're childish), you agree with me."Yeah, wholeheartedly. They're also petty criminals on occassion."In a court of law this would not hold up to go against them, aside from the little Jim Crow, elitist town of Massachusetts that this trial was set."First of all, why are you taking such a bizzare, personal offense to a TV show?Second, with all of the crimes I provided, the four could have easily gotten more jail time. But they were only charged with breaking the Good Samaratin law. This does not mean they weren't guilty of other crimes, which was the only real criteria for this debate."Now I will say all the times Newman, who should have been the one tried, has tried to harm Jerry and other characters..."Why? Just because Newman did a bunch of crimes doesn't mean the Seinfeld gang was innocent. What kind of logic is that? Maybe after the show was cancelled, Newman was tried by the Seinfeld gang. Who knows. Anyways, two episodes of your evidence are also evidence against the gang: "The Package" (Kramer's mail fraud), and "The Engagement" (Kramer paid Newman to kidnap the dog).1. http://en.wikipedia.org...(Seinfeld)2. http://blogs.findlaw.com...