Faith in god is faithlessness in man

RebuttalsMy opponent claims to the absolute statement that man seeks solace from heaven or other divine forces when he has no human or material support. Since he has made an absolute claim, my only responsibility is to provide an instance in which his absolute claim is not valid and since my opponent makes the following three claims: that faith in god = faithlessness in man, man seeks solace from heaven when he has no other human to provide support and materialistic people put more faith in money than other men, I shall be rebutting these claims.Faith in God=Faithlessness in manI myself have neither faith in God nor faith in mankind, though perhaps I do have faith in mankind going by my opponent's signs that materialistic people have no faith in man such as helping others and giving to charity, which I do. Moreover, the statements, "Faith in God" and "Faithlessness in man" are not congruent in the least; popular Christian philosophy states that faith in man is nearly as important to faith in God, and what my opponent claims are signs for faith in mankind i.e helping others in time of need, is a well-known calling card of contemporary Christianity.(1) Therefore, there are also those that are both religious (faith in God) and are prone to charity and to draw support from others (faith in man). What I'm trying to say is that it is entirely possible to both put faith in man and in God, or neither. It is possible to put faith in God and therefore man because they trust that God will act through man. More on Christian catechism can be found in the sources, I suggest you read the section labeled "Charity" for the purposes of this debate.Man seeks solace from heaven in the absence of solace from manThis, again, is not inherently true. I can site my own brother-in-law as an example. My brother spent the final years of his life wracked with mental illness; he had a psychosis after his brother and father were murdered at the same time (I can site the news article, but I'm afraid, for purposes of privacy, one must message me privately for the link. I insist on sending my opponent the article upon request) and went into a spiral in which he trusted no one, not even his own wife, kids or mother. My brother-in-law was also a religious man who often spoke about the nature of God, but he didn't like him; he was a misotheist. He sadly passed by his own hand putting no faith into the support of God or other men as indicated by a note left behind.Materialistic PeopleI'm going to give my opponent the benefit of the doubt with this one and suppose that PRO was going off of the colloquial definition of materialism as, "A tendency to consider material possessions and physical comfort as more important than spiritual value" instead of the philosophical definition, "The doctrine that nothing exists except matter and its movements and modifications," in which PRO is correct in the former case, but incorrect in the latter.ArgumentsAs the burden of proof rests with my opponent who made the positive claim, I rest my case for this round, adding the statement that any argument I would make can be found in my rebuttals of my opponent's.Source(s)(1) More on Christian catechism: http://www.vatican.va...