Semantics Debate: Sports cars are better than Smart Cars

First of all I'd just like to point out how side Pro appears to have completely disregarded the definitions I posted earlier and simply proceeded with his own. Because of this, I ask conduct points go to Con.On top of that, I'd like to contest Pro's definition of the term "Smart Car"-1) Pro has neither defined the resolution nor specified when the resolution would be defined during round 1. He also never specified who would be defining the resolution.2) He sources his definition of "Smart Car" from a Wikipedia entry on the "Smart Fortwo". Questionability of Wikipedia aside, these two words are clearly NOT the same term. Unless my opponent can find an alternative definition from a dictionary/encyclopedia website headed under "Smart Car" my previous definition should take precedence in this debate.However, as my opponent requested me to reserve rebuttals and semantic arguments for the third round, I will oblige and refer to the "Smart ForTwo" during my opening arguments, for the sake of debating the same resolution. However, this clearly puts side Con at a disadvantage in a debate based on Semantics. Because of this, again, I ask conduct points to be awarded to side Con.That said, before I begin my constructive arguments, I would like to define the term "better" as "more advantageous/effective" [1]. Advantages would include aspects such as performance, safety, environmental friendliness, affordability, etc.1. The Smart ForTwo has better gas mileage than sports cars.The new 2012 Audi TTS model is, according to intellichoice.com, the most fuel efficient consumer sports car of all time, with an average rate of 27 Miles Per Gallon (henceforth referred to as MPG) [2]. Conversely, the Smart ForTwo runs at an average of 36 MPG [3]. The nearly 10 mile difference between the two could potentially amount to hundreds of dollars in savings every year, especially with rising gas prices. I conclude that in terms of gas mileage, the Smart ForTwo is much better that any sports car.2. The Smart ForTwo is more affordable than sports cars.The starting price for the 2012 Smart ForTwo is quoted as $12490 [4]. For the 2012 fuel efficient sport car model mentioned earlier, the starting price is $56850, which is nearly five times the price [5]! Even used sport cars are usually twice as expensive as new Smart ForTwos, so in terms of affordability, the Smart ForTwo is much better than any sports car.3. The Smart ForTwo is more environmentally friendly than sports cars.The body of the Smart ForTwo is recyclable. The small chassis means that less smog is created during the process of manufacturing the Smart ForTwo. On top of that, the increased MPG means that less fuel is wasted, one of the main reasons why the EPA (Enviromental Protection Agency) rates the ForTwo as an ULEV (Ultra Low Emissions Vehicle) as well as the "most economical car without hybrid drive" [6]. It is clear that in terms of environmental friendliness, the Smart ForTwo is better than any sports car.From arguments 1 and 2, it is clear that the Smart ForTwo is much more cost effective than a sports car. For the majority of Americans (earning an average of around $26 000 per year), it is much better choice to go with the fuel efficient, economical Smart ForTwo than an overpriced, overly luxurious sports car.Thank you.[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...[2] http://www.intellichoice.com...[3] http://cars.findthebest.com...[4] http://www.cars.com...[5]http://www.autoweek.com...[6]http://www.benzinsider.com...