THB: God exists.

Refutation- beginning of the universe:This ought not to be a point of clash, actually- I'm perfectly happy to agree that this incarnation of the universe had a beginning. This doesn't really contradict any ideas I may later invoke, such as the multiverse hypothesis or the cyclical universe hypothesis.Refutation- fine tuning:The two canonical explanations to the apparent fine-tuning of the universe are the multiverse and cyclical universe hypotheses:Multiverse:The multiverse hypothesis (see 7, 8) states that there are a very large (or infinite) number of universes each of which have slightly different laws of physics. The many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics (9, 10) can be considered a multiverse hypthesis. Pro postulated that there was no evidence for multiverses, but there is plenty- see sources 16:20.Cyclical universe:The cyclical universe (11, 12) is similar, except instead of postulating many universes existing at once, it suggests that the universe in which we live either collapses in on itself or expands indefinitely, and then bounces back to form a new universe.Implications:Both these ideas explain the apparent fine-tuning of the universe as they invoke sheer numbers- to use Pro's analogy, yes, it is remarkable that the gunman could hit such a small target from so far away, but if you have 10^60 blind gunmen aiming in completely random directions, it is quite unremarkable that at least one of them should hit the target.Unified field theoryAnother idea from physics which would explain the apparent fine-tuning is the unified field theory (13, 14) which states that the fundamental forces, and therefore their associated physical constants, are inherently related. Indeed, some of them have been proven to be related- one example of this is that the speed of light is equal to the reciprocal of the square root of the product of the permittivity of free space with its permeability (15). If all the physical constants are related, then the apparent fine-tuning of the universe is an inevitable result of their dependences on one another. If some, but not all, are related (and it is undeniable that at least some are), then this reduces the impressiveness of the metaphorical gunman's shot, as it was an easier shot to make- if he got a few constants right, the rest inevitably fell into place.Summary:So, to summarise my case so far:1) Omnimaximality is internally inconsistent, and so God cannot exist.2) Evil would not exist in a universe with an omnimaximal being, and so God does not exist as evil does.3) Multiverse and cyclical universe hypotheses make the apparent fine-tuning of the universe very unremarkable, as there are so many universes (or incarnations of the same one) that the fact that one (or more) is hospitable to life is inevitable.4) Unified field theories blow fine-tuning out of the water- the constants are inherently related, so that they converge is inevitable.Sources:[7]: https://en.wikipedia.org...[8]: http://www.dummies.com...[9]: https://en.wikipedia.org...[10]: https://plato.stanford.edu...[11]: https://en.wikipedia.org...[12]: https://www.accessscience.com...[13]: https://en.wikipedia.org...[14]: https://physics.stackexchange.com...[15]: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...[16]: https://futurism.com...[17]: http://www.telegraph.co.uk...[18]: http://www.express.co.uk...[19]: https://www.spaceanswers.com...[20]: https://www.space.com...