Should Gay marriage be legalized

Gay marriage is the relation between two same-sex people and for every child it is necessary to rise with father and mother. For instance, William Rees-Mogg, author of "Extending the right to marry only weakens an institution that society needs to be strong" published in Times magazine, cites : "Ian Duncan Smith, one of the most effective members of the coalition, published a strategy on social justice that takes the view that children are indeed best reared in a stable marriage". It is very strong argument about how gay marriage influence on children. From the past until now fathers considered to be strict but mothers are considered to be soft and by the help of this nature parents can support children's emotional needs and every child needs this softness and at the same time father's strictness. Girls who are raised without their mothers are at higher risk for early sexual activities, they have low academic performance and became bad-tempered. An Apr. 2001 study published in American Sociological Review put forward for consideration that children with gay parents are more likely to attract on homosexual behavior, pedophilia or even pornography. In addition, gay marriage could destroy the real sense of the family. Children will not be able to understand the meaning of this word. It will be difficult to teach children the family importance and traditions when such uncertainty exists. Furthermore, gay marriage increases the chance of getting diseases. As you know, biologically gay's sexual contact is the major cause of venereal diseases such as HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome), HPV(Human Papillomavirus Infection) gonorrhea, syphilis, trichomoniasis, herpes, hepatitis types B and C which are sexually transmitted. The main reasons of occurring such infection are that homosexual men have great number of sex partners, in addition during coitus (sexual act) they do not use a condom which is used as a protection against infection during their sexual contact. Study which done in 1998 by The Center for Disease Control in America reports that 54 percent of people who suffer from AIDS are homosexual men and 90 percent of people suffering from HIV are gay people. On to the issue of "equality." Based on the opponent's representation of "equality," all members within a group should be allowed to marry, regardless of their individual nature. Going by that theory, the government should legally enable me to marry my car, and I should receive benefits for it, for the sake of "happiness," as my opponent simplistically poses it. This is absurd, of course, and this is because the nature of an individual certainly affects what rights he is eligable for. (Example: If someone developed a chronic bone condition that disallowed him to work, there is a good chance that the government would provide him with disability benefits. Do I also deserve these benefits, even though I am perfectly healthy and capable of working?) "Equality," in our society, means that everyone receives the rights that they are eligable for, based on compatibility of individuals' traits. Moreover, I have shown in my previous argument that homosexual partnership, by its inherent nature, does not meet the "procreation/child-rearing type" format that would make it eligable for marriage. The issue is not a matter of "inequality," as the opponent's argument suggests. In conclusion gay marriage should not be legalized. Now I will turn it over to my opponent.