With John McCain, the highest chance of World War III will be upon us.

Off the first paragraph--> I agree Mr. McCain is a war hero just like the 600 people that were in his POW camp. HOWEVER, I am not voting for him to be my next president because he is a war hero. Being a war hero and being a good president are two separate entities. Keeping that in mind, we look to the end of the paragraph where you claim that I have to prove that McCain = WWIII straight up, and this is not true. Analyze the resolution at all and you will realize that the words, "highest chance" appears and it appears for a reason. It is impossible to ever warrant the future, but when you talk about what gives a high chance of something to happen, THEN the debate ability appears. Therefore, I will warrant that the voting of John McCain into presidency DOES give us the highest chance of WWIII then any other event in history. I challenge my opponent to prove this wrong. Off paragraph 2--> Mr. McCain has talked about how awful war is. But then why does he talk about going to war EVERY TIME a foreign problem occurs? (examples): Georgia invades Russia, no media covers it. Russia invades Georgia in revenge John McCain wants to go to war. Iran MIGHT be getting nukes (there is YET to be substantial proof of how close they are) and John McCain wants to go to war with them. HE HAS CRITISIZED OBAMA FOR WANTING TO TALK ABOUT IT. Diplomacy is HARDLY an option of John McCain. The quotes from round one (particularly the 2000 quotes) proves that John McCain is willing to go to war if he A) doesn't know the whole situation or B) doesn't know if this possible threat is a threat. Do you really want another war in Iraq (in Iran) where you're wrong about WMD's and do you really want another cold war or do you really want a war in some other country that John McCain considers a threat? !? !? If Iran gets nukes, they will let us know. The whole reason ANY country wants them is negotiation purposes. Don't make the mistake of preemption with John McCain. This threat of WWIII is GREATEST with John McCain. Off paragraph 3: Job to be finished… HA… The "job" was to remove the WMD's and we were successful before we even went into Iraq. Let me take you back to 2002 when we sent the UN into Iraq to peacefully look for nukes in Iraq (since they broke the treaty they signed). The UN finds nothing, but of course Mr. Bush and Mr. McCain begin to convince us that they could have hid them (which is possible)… BUT THEY WERE COMPLETELY AND 100% WRONG. But that is not what I am worried about I am worried about John McCain STILL saying he has supported the war throughout the entire time. "NO REGRETS! " Let's just say that McCain leads us into Georgia/Russia… a half of a year later, Russia is out… but now wouldn't we be committed to "finishing" a totally different war with Russia? !? Mr. McCain, THIS IS WHY YOU USE DIPLOMACY. But yet, he has yet to show any signs of negotiations with anyone. "There are other places in the world where we may have to" paragraph: Here, I simply want to challenge my opponent one thing. I have found several quotes hinting toward John McCain wanting to go to war. I want my opponent to find a quote where he wants to negotiate (or use diplomacy). Because if he thinks that there are other places in the world "where we may have to"… I want to know that we ACTUALLY have to and not that HE only thinks so. CHALLENGE: Find me a quote where John McCain will use diplomacy. While looking for you speech request of when he said "there are going to be more wars", I found another interesting quote. From- . http://mccainsource.com... Quote: McCain: "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran. " In April 2007, McCain, speaking to voters in South Carolina, responded to a question about Iran by singing "Bomb, bomb Iran" to the tune of the Beach Boys' "Barbara Ann. " A man had asked McCain about sending "an air mail message to Tehran. " McCain answered by singing, "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran. " He then added: "Iran is dedicated to the destruction of Israel. But as far as the speech goes, this seems to be closest to the report on the speech at least. An article liked you asked for: . http://www.huffingtonpost.com... What makes me so certain that John McCain gives us the greatest chance for WWIII is that he says straight up that there are going to be other wars rather than we are going to have to try our best to avoid possible wars of the future. In one second he says there is nothing worse than war, than the next second he says there is going to be more wars. Well Mr. McCain, HOW ARE WE GOING TO AVOID THESE WARS? !? !? And as far as the Georgian conflict, it is just the way that McCain responded to it that makes me EXTREMELY nervous. Next Paragraph (8 year old article): If they break international law, it should be the UN's problem, not John McCain. But of course, John McCain (and all of America) think that international problems are there problems, thus they call for action against all countries with nukes (except for the original 5 allowed by the UN)… The article IS 8 years old which shows that John McCain has been calling for action against countries for a long time now. I have yet to be presented another person that is so aggressive THUS he gives the greatest chance for WWIII. 2nd to last paragraph--> McCain's desire goes beyond the simple request for the increase in just bombing. It's the increase in death and war. He says war is so bad, well that is because of action LIKE increase in bombing. SURE our position in the war could have been strengthened, but is it really worth the innocent death? As far as the last paragraph goes, I have no problem with the actions of him during war. But I think that those actions may (and have due to his own words and action) have corrupted him into thinking that war is an answer that we must turn to often. In the end, I have yet to see a man so close to the presidency that seems destined to go to war more than John McCain. I'm not saying that WWIII will happen with him… but I am saying that he gives the greatest chance for it. Even if the WWIII level is reached, war is still inevitable under his reign as president and I can't vote for that. Because of all of these reasons, I urge you to vote PRO. Thank You!