Evolution vs Creationism

"So all you have said is 'all life comes from life.' But we are asking where life itself came from..." I will deny that the Theory of Evolution assumes that life came from a single cell that just-so-happened to have appeared from nothing. However, the same argument can be made for God and all life. In Genesis, the First Story of Creation, "God formed man out of the clay of the ground and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and so man became a living being." The Bible assumes that God managed to make organic life out of inorganic material, and gave man the "breath of life." We must assume that the clay took the complex form of man rather than simply a mound of clay and dirt; we must assume that the clay took the form of a human body, forming blood vessels and arteries, organs, skin, hair, eyes, limbs, fingers, neurons, etc. However, I will not end my argument with an unanswered question. I have been looking into this recently and discovered "Prebiotic molecules," the supposed building blocks which created all of life. Prebiotic molecules are the chemical and environmental precursors of organic life. It is believed that prebiotic molecules were necessary for the creation and evolution of life, being the raw materials from which living cells were formed, brought by meteorites and comet-like objects (S1). Molecules containing the four elements, nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen, can synthesize amino acids, carbohydrates, nucleic acids and other key compounds for life. According to many sources and professional scientific researchers, space is teeming with molecules such as Formamide (NH2CHO) with these elements (S2). For example. in Leiden University, the Astrophysics Laboratory found that interstellar dust in space contains the bulk of organic material in the universe. The deposit of prebiotic dust molecules likely occurred as many as five times in the first 500-700 million years on primitive Earth (S3). To summarize my point on prebiotic molecules, many scientists and researchers can assume that, because of the massive amounts of compounds which contain the elements essential for creating life, and assuming that there have been collisions many between Meteorites and Earth, I can conclude that these prebiotic molecules found on the meteorites were deposited on Earth, and formed the very first living cells.¨Evolution must account for irreducible complexity, which it cannot. Evolution posits that life changes over gradual changes due to small and random DNA mutations. However, animals have body parts that could not possibly have evolved slowly over time. They are 'irreducibly complex' - meaning they could only pop into existence all at once totally formed, because small gradual changes would have killed the animal and stopped Natural Selection.¨You claim that evolution cannot account for great changes in animals because they're "irreducibly complex." However, you fail to provide any claims about why things such as God and creationism are less irreducibly complex. God is supposedly a being who can create anything, whether it's matter or energy, by saying things like "Let there be light!" Complex things such as light and the Earth were created with the simple phrase of "Let there..." and thus it appears. We don't question it. We just assume it happened, just as you assume that evolution is impossible because it is "too complex."Assuming that, because of research done through carbon dating and geology, however, we can assume that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, even though the Bible claims that it is only around six thousand years even though trees such as the Old Tjikko tree surpass nine thousand years (S4). If the Eath is around 4.5 billion years old, then certainly evolution can dramatically change certain creatures such as apes to man."The incredibly precise and complex universe we observe was created by accident."I don't want to explain this in a way that is hard to understand but, people simply assume that the formation of the world was "no mere accident" because we have no other precedent to use to judge how "perfect" this world is. We can assume that we regard this world as "no mere accident" also because we're alive, and we assume that the only reason we are alive is because of how the world was made.I personally strongly believe that the Universe was created by the Big Bang, and all life was created through prebiotic molecules. As Steven Hawking argues, "Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing, spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist."Sources:S1) https://www.merriam-webster.com...;S2) http://www.agenciasinc.es...;S3) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... S4) http://mentalfloss.com...S5) https://www.theguardian.com...;