BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Theistic evolution is not compatible with God or His Word.

Apparently the Pro doesn't understand his own debate. The key word here is the word "compatible" Compatible-able to exist or occur together without a conflict. simplified: Theistic evolution is not able to occur together without a conflict with God or His Word. My argument was basically trying to unite science and religion together. Filling the void, countering the pro's argument, and trying to The Con had commented that the theistic evolution is basically child like smattering of bible appreciation. To me, the theistic creationist is basically bunch of people believing the Cinderella or the Harry Potter. " I do not think we can continue debating this topic without becoming embroiled in supposed evidences for evolution," I was simply rebutting the argument, is there anything wrong with that? "I therefore do not think my opponent can make any good arguments on why theistic evolution is not compatible with God or His Word. " You are the Pro, and you're arguing that the theistic evolution is not compatible with God or His Word. MY job is to argue that it IS compatible. It seems that the Pro is either giving a false reason to avoid my argument or that he just don't want to debate anymore. This round is a waste. I await the Pro's excuse. May I also ask the Pro to give example instead of asking the audience to scan through 3-4 paragraphs just to find what he or she means.
Teacher Tenure

1) Tenure: : the right to keep a job (especially the job of being a professor at a college or university) for as long as you want to have it. 2) Tenure (As defined by American Association of University Professors): Since its founding in 1915, the Association has seen tenure as necessary to protect academic freedom. Tenure, briefly stated, is an arrangement whereby faculty members, after successful completion of a period of probationary service, can be dismissed only for adequate cause or other possible circumstances and only after a hearing before a faculty committee. The Association, also from its inception, has assumed responsibility for developing standards and practices, sometimes in cooperation with other organizations, to give concrete meaning to tenure. Key Association policy statements are the 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure, the 1958 Statement on Procedural Standards in Faculty Dismissal Proceedings, and the Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom and Tenure. I would like to allow the Pro to decide which definition will be used. So far as the debate structure goes, I would like the second round to be stating preliminary arguments. he third and fourth used for rebuttal and concluding statements accordingly, as long as this is amiable to the Pro. I look forward to this debate, best of luck. Sources 1. . http://www.merriam-webster.com... 2. . http://www.aaup.org...
insaf

My opponent has still yet to negate the resolution, meaning that he/she is yet to show that he/she should be part of Insaf. I will now construct a positive argument as to why Insaf would be better off without my opponent.Affirmative CaseA1: My opponent's atrocious grammarMy opponent's opening round showcased some terrible grammar. Here are instances of it and why it matters.Firstly, my opponent repeatedly fails to capitalise "insaf", the name of the organisation he/she wishes to represent. My opponent even fails to capitalise this in the resolution. I am sure that Insaf would be highly embarrassed to have a candidate that cannot even correctly capitalise the name of the organisation he/she represents.Secondly, my opponent has incorrectly formatted a would-be letter:"dear juje and my majestyi request to take side of imran khan and i will try to make a top level for him he always try and win"According to Wikihow, my opponent has left out some crucial aspects in his/her would-be letter, of which include the date of the letter and the signature of the letter-writer [1]. In politics, it is absolutely crucial that politicians present themselves well, and politicians will be, at some stage, be required to present themselves well through written letters [2].Lastly, there are numerous instances of non-capitalised words that should be capitalised ("dear", "today", imran" etc.). Such complete disregard for he beautiful English language is not compatible with representing people as a politician, as politicians must present well and be able to express themselves well. References[1] http://www.wikihow.com...[2] http://www.youthcentral.vic.gov.au...
insaf

today my dream was to be a polition and i become and in that i learn i prafer for insaf but it is not coming i wish my biggest dream will come in real when nawaz sharif will leave his seat and imran khan will come and this happened by darna and jalsa wil start i big hope with imran khan dear juje and my majesty i request to take side of imran khan and i will try to make a top level for him he always try and win
What representation of how life began is true: Religion or Evolution

Neither religion or evolution are representative of how lofe began. Religion is man tyring to reach God or heaven or trying to earn salvaiton or eternal life. Evolution is a religious beleif ssytem in which the believer hopes to be one who survives with the fittest and maybe to evolve into a god-like creature (forgetting the fact that the evolutionist is already made in God's image). God is the Creator of all. He is real. He is not religion. You cannot find Him by religion, and you sure can't find Him be evolution.You can't escape God by believing in evolution. You can't reach God through religion. Life comes from God. Life means God is good.
What representation of how life began is true: Religion or Evolution

The question of how we came to be has haunted the human race ever since the dawn of our age. There are many answers to this important question. My view is one in a trillion but I believe it counts, as does every other. My stance is that if there is more evidence supporting and idea, then it is only logical to give this idea more thought. I spent time researching the two major stances going along with this question. I have decided to support the idea that our intelligent species did not just form out of thin air but that we are the result of millions upon millions of evolution and natural selection. I will hear any argument as long as it is not rude of demeaning in any way. A debate on this topic should be professional. Please use viable sources and any visual aid you deem necessary. I await this debate with deep anticipation.
EPIC RAP BATTLE c:<

I hope Socaialpinko has something to say this round. Beat you man from night to the break of dawn I am the king, ur nothing but a pawn At the sight of me ur gone, kill u as u spawn I am so delicate as a swan, this rap i won Why dont u put ur pride behind, U think ur too good you are blind Ur too tense lets unwind, ur life I designed, ur death already signed Ur not good u resigned, I am the champion that who ur find. Out of ur mind, I m too unkind, I am god of mankind. Socialpinko ur just another kill, beating u will be such a thrill I have too much skills, ur defeat I shall fulfill, you should just chill I have more power than Kim Jong il, make u swallow my poison pill You hear the alarm? This ain't a fire drill! Its me crushing ur will This was a easy battle, What I showed u wasn't even the sample When u rap against me u taste defeat, right off the beat Debate Nerdykiller and its ur loss, cause i'm such a boss You already had a forfeit, I am the deadly GREREN hornet Why are you such a loser, just another wannabe poser I knoiw ur furure, a gay old cougar, that ain't a rumor Ur rap so bad there is no humor, stop jrapping ur not any cooler Like I said I just shoot u with my lger, cause i am a epic shooter U declared this war, now hear me roar, This i swore That i will soar, and leave u sore to ur core beat u so hard u bleed on the damn floor U life dignity everything u had is no more This has been Nerdykiller, I know I am such a thriller When ever we bicker, I leave u bitter, cruel than Hitler I am the victor, the MOTHER FVCKING WINNER
EPIC RAP BATTLE c:<

Thanks for ur comeback and let the battle continue. Dude i dont know who u think u are ur nothing while i shine like the star Riddle ur body with holes from afar Conquer this rap like the mighty Czar There is no denying, that ur lying, when i be prying B1tch ur be crying, dying, what are u applying? That i am trying? My skills are defying, so blinding when i come around u be hiding, i m too frightening. U think u can fight, bring it on i will raise this to new height U B1tch I strike u down at this site, Srry if i m not polite When i tell u its not gonna be fuking alright, when i kill u tonight I m the brightest light that shine in the darkest night u cant even recite ur own damn rap when its so damn black n white Its so simple either flight or fight, yet u choose to stay at this site I m like the deadly Bubonic virus, I raps are priceless Beat u so hard ur highness, no MotherFucjer ur nothing lifeless U a loser so spineless, I aint bias, but its true that ur mindless After this u will be in crisis, how bad i beat u with no kindness Ur rhymes are piece of sh1t, so weak unable to take a hit Rip ur body to pieces and give it a spit, ur too weak not even fit When u accepted this battle it was ur blunder, leave u to rot in the gutter I am lie lighting ur thunder, ur nothing just another sucker, Ur a white wannabe usher, that thins his so vulgar, jus watch me send u under I am stunner, a youngster, a wonder, Fight me and ur bloody suffer, U have a Glock well i am classy shot u with a luger, While driving my big@ss hummer
EPIC RAP BATTLE c:<

Alright, my hooker's departed time to get this sh1t started Everyone knows I'm the rap master, this wannabe's just retarded He aint got no skills, I can't imagine why he even trying Little pvssy you better go home now, or I guarantee you'll be dying Let me take the time to warn you now if you comin' up here I'm gonna beat yo a$$ down, no one will dare to interfere And when you start sh1t with me, you best be aware When I come a rollin, there ain't no way to prepare Roll up in my Pssywaggon, before you even know what's goin on I'll be all over you, you really thought you'd survive- come on Cause I ain't playing b1tch, I'm a hard a$$ mothafucka As hard or cold or ruthless as me there isn't any other Best for you to sleep with an eye open, watching out just in case Cause I'm coming for you and when I'm done, there won't be any trace One shot from my Glock, be sure to put you to sleep Now your dead mothafucka, never made even a peep.
EPIC RAP BATTLE c:<

WHATS UP Socialpinko!! Good luck and I hope u dont get offended by any of this. >:D Please dude ur nothing none, let me teach u rap 101 When u rap against me ur done, if u can u should run I shine brighter then the sun, kill u with my automatic gun Ur so bad just be gone, ur worse then the barbaric hun Lets go i love chase, before i smash ur face Against u I m the ace, Fling u out to space Beat u at a breakneck pace, put u in a coffin case let me remind u of ur place, ur nothing no trace Unlike u i got game, while ur so lame Engulf u in flame, while i shine in fame With my gun i have steady aim getting head shots on target ur face the same Dude stop trying to rhyme ur only wasting my time Wat u got ain't even worth a dime u rap so bad it should be a crime I am a menace, classic like venice When i step u to the stage u better be scare Ur defeat is coming say ur prayer Ur defeat i shall deliver, ur aint nothing but a beginner I m something so sinister, ur not gonna make it to dinner I be slaying, preying, the way be playing, u be praying, ur life u be paying When i come rapping, everyone be clapping, ur face I be slapping Here i come bring the heat, can u smell ur defeat, let me give u a beat Take a seat, this aint trick or treat, my rap so sweet, this round is complete
My favorite color es orange

Your favorite color is red. Didn't you know that about yourself? Don't resist, give in and admit it. You love the color red. When you hear the word "red," your body is filled with ecstasy. Are you listening, sir? Red is not just your favorite color, it is the greatest color that has ever existed. It is everybody's favorite. It is timeless and fashionable. Nobody likes orange things. they're simple and tacky. RED is the way to go. RED! RED until infinity! RED is the pinnacle of human achievement! Before the invention of red, the world was a dull, monotone place! RED is your favorite color! It is everyone's favorite color! Orange looks like a hideous pile of vomit! RED is vibrant, moody, fun, lifelike, it is the source of all passion and imagination! It's appeared in hundreds upon hundreds of paintings and, unlike orange, it's a primary color! Orange is a byproduct of the electromagnetic spectrum, RED is where it's at! Orange is the child of red and yellow, but RED can stand out on its own, as a real color with great potential! RED is the color of cherries-apples-beets-it's wholesome and vibrant! The only orange fruit is the orange! Oranges are dull and lifeless, they're the destroyer of many a school lunch and hard to peel! APPLES are crisp and refreshing and filled with vitamins, and CHERRIES are the most succulent thing known to man, and BEETS have saved civilization to their profuse amounts and ease to grow! You fool! RED is your favorite color, and you simply won't admit it! RED is the basis of all mankind. Please, sir. Admit it. RED is your favorite color, the opus of all that is holy, the greatest color that one can put down on a canvas, the vibrant, crumbly, passionate swirls or RED! RED is the best color to ever be produced, anywhere! ORANGE is a murky darkness, RED comes in so many more shades and hues, and it's been painted by many, many more artists! Dear god, man, simply admit it! Say it! You HATE ORANGE! ORANGE is the killer of the soul! RED is here forever and only! Admit it and all will be forgiven. Thank you. I like your book.
That we should get rid of state governments in Australia

You have a problem with this layering government but this is done in order to promote democracy. There need not be one group of people making decisions but rather the layers that you speak of because that will allow a concensus from more represnetatives of the people and will better the entire country as a whole. By you wanting one layer, you are leaving the possiblilty for a type of absolute/oligarchial government that can result in less of a democracy and this will limit the democracy for the people. It may be more difficult to agree but this is good becuase that way people are voicing their opinion to show that the country could be split on an issue, which allows each person to have their own opinion.You seem to think that the abolition of state government could lead to health care and on what are you basing this on? And how do you know that it will be successful? And again. You said that it would be better for one Minister to make the decision rather than multiple state Ministers but this is not true. An absolute monarchy only guarantees the satisfaction of one person. Multiple people will lead to greater fairness as most people are allowed to voice their opinion. It is better to allow that more people can voice their opinion and help make decision rather than one. Because even if there is disagreement, it shows that if there are 2 decision being made and the decision to implement the decision is 50/50 both ways, then it would be good to be split on the decision because if one decision was chosen over the other, this would cause the loser (50% of the people) to be unhappy and disappointed on the decision.The state vs federal law that you are decribing is merely a way of making decision more fair toward everyone rather not just the federalists or the states.You said that the states being removed would reduce state taxes but that would hurt the government so much. They government's income would shrink and that would not be good. The taxes are unfortunate but they are necissary for the government to maintain that stability.State governments promote a more democratic and fair society that leave the citizens happier.
That we should get rid of state governments in Australia

I thank the opposition, and would like to begin with rebuttal. The opposition has stated that the Us does not have the right to intervene with state government in another country, i agree that the US has no right to do so but As someone who lives in Australia, I have the right to say we as Australians should abolish state governments. The topic doesn't state that the US should decide for Australia. Australia should decide for itself, Australia should abolish state governments in Australia. Here are my arguments: Each layer of government requires its own resources, the more layers the more resources are needed, abolishment of state governments will lead to less resources needed and instead of trying to get more resources members of government will be doing their jobs, making the government more efficient. Multiple government layers make decision making a more difficult process because both state and federal governments need to agree. This can often lead to arguments between states. The abolition of state governments could lead to many changes, one of these is that Australia will have one health care and hospital system, this would result in better quality health and nursing services; as well as improved training and facilities. The Health portfolio would be better managed by a single Minister responsible for the whole system rather than multiple State Ministers with less responsibility. We as the affirmative team believe that a National Police Force and a National set of criminal statutes across Australia would simplify policing and crime related issues. Having different laws for different States is expensive, time wasting and inconsistent across Australia. There is a need to remove conflict between State and Federal laws. The abolishment of state governments could lead to a single rail and transport system across Australia, with development of a fast rail network between capital cities, would be a benefit to all Australians. A better managed rail and transport system would deliver a better service to the people in addition to creating jobs and infrastructure. Businesses would also benefit because state taxes would be removed, reducing the costs to business operators which could then be passed on to consumers. Getting rid of state governments would lead to both a more efficient and united Australia.
That we should get rid of state governments in Australia

Over time, we have seen the constant overlap of Australia"s three levels of government, with multiple governments assuming responsibility for the same thing such as a national curriculum, and investment by the federal government in health and public transport. By abolishing state governments, there will be no overlapping thus governments will know what is their responsibility and what"s not their responsibility, this will make it easier for politicians to do their job as they will not have to discuss what is whose responsibility. State governments have also becoming increasingly reliant on federal governments for funding, with the proceeds of the GST going entirely to the states despite being a federal tax. By removing State Governments there would be a huge savings for taxpayers with less perks and fewer lifetime pensions; whilst at the same time making those remaining Federal politicians more responsible and accountable for their electorates.
Guns should be banned

Thanks and good luck And what a compelling argument may I add Them stats are truly appalling, So making a law to ban guns Law seems to work doesn't it ? you know , It deters people from committing or participating in the act that the law was made for. I suggest we apply this system, Law. And ban people from committing suicide . Maybe a 1 year minimum jail sentence for anybody that kills themselves. And a 4 month sentence for people that accidentally kill themselves. It might be worth a try. Glue guns are harmless unless in the wrong hands, Banning all guns to me seems a little," over the top " I mean flare guns help more people then they hurt, if we banned all guns carpenters would be outraged. Banning nail guns would easily quadruple their workloads if they had to resort back to the old ways. History shows us that we have been starting Olympic events like running races with a starting gun for centuries, and with no fatal injuries, banning them would be a test for runners to adapt to the new starting method, and in a sport where 100s of seconds count the sport can not afford it. However many a life has been badly affected, emotionally and money wise from the harm of radar guns. This I think could be looked into. The banning of guns would effect the already crippled car manufacturing companies, cars painted with brushes are far less pleasing to the eye, Then ones painted with spray guns. Having to turn in my son's water guns , fake guns, and his favorite bubble gun. would seem a little over the top, and certain games on the old x box would be much harder to play with out a gun. And for the guns that go bang and shoot a bullet. I say banning guns would make life a lot more difficult for everyone , law abiding citizens would be affected for no good reason, the police force would be a joke. And with so many guns out there criminals would still find it easy to get 1. We do however, well I think , need to help people more that might want to kill themselves. Although this sometimes can be impossible. We should as people learn ways to be more aware of others and their intentions, if I lived with Johnny and I suspected Johnny might and could harm himself. Their is know way I would have a gun in my house. That's I law I would make for myself. If we want to not ban guns on the arguments that I provided . I say it simply will not do. If we want to ban guns , on them 2 arguments you provided. I say it simply will not do. So let's leave it like it is and not ban guns. Oh and my statement. Flare guns help more people then they hurt, maybe that might not be true, I'm trying to look into this and I will get back to you . THANKS
Guns should be banned

ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddThanks for accepting. I will be making my arguments this round.Argument I: Suicides will decreaseSuicides will decrease. Guns are one of the easiest ways to not feel the pain when killing yourself. About 50% of Suicides are from guns. If we ban guns, this will decrease about 20-30% of suicides. This is because killing with a knife gives much more pain then a gun. Therefore suicides will decrease if we ban guns.Argument II: Accidental deathsThe second argument of mine is accidental deaths. "In 2007, the United States suffered some 15,000-19,000 accidental shootings…American children under age 15 were nine times more likely to die of a gun accident than children in other advanced wealthy countries… About 200 Americans go to emergency rooms every day with gunshot wounds…[1]"Because there are accidental deaths, one accidentally pressed button will send a bullet flying, it might kill someone.Vote for Pro. http://www.thedailybeast.com...tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttVote for Pro.
Muhammad Ali is the best heavyweight boxer of all time

For my final statement I reference the computerized program titled "The Super Fight." This computerized program was designed to settle debates about different boxers from different eras being the best. Well, according to "The Super Fight" tournament, Marciano knocked out Ali in the 13th round to become the greatest heavyweight champ in boxing history. For more information about this unique program check out this: http://en.wikipedia.org...