THE OFFICIAL IZBO TRIAL; Resolved: Izbo10 should be permanently banned

"I have shown incredible restraint in the face of unrelenting stupidity"- a incredibly wise man, could have been me. My actions has been justified in the light of incredible ignorance and lack of respect of the truth on this site. Some examples of this include but are not limited too: Justcallmetarzan not understanding a syllogism. He was told a syllogism must persist of a major and minor premise, yet his guy presents this: All the parts of the table are wood(minor premise) therefore the table is wooden. What made this worse is he argued this was not a syllogism: Anything from which all parts are made of wood is wooden (Major premise) All the parts of the table are wood (minor premise) Therefore the table is wooden (conclusion) http://www.thefreedictionary.com... That is incredible stupidity, where are the 2 premises? Huh, he was just taught that it needs a major and minor premise and he forgot the major premise? Really, that is ignorance that needs to be called out. His lack of understanding the difference between knowledge and belief. He continues to conflate these in spite of many attempts to educate him on the difference. We have Retardedarsenal who attempts to pass himself as going to seminary, when in reality all of his debates completely ignore what is taught in every respected seminary across the country and instead he relies on tired apologetics. The majority of this board does not even understand that a false dichotomy or a god of the gaps fallacy is a fallacy. This has shown up many times when I point out other supernatural alternatives to god and they are thrown out. I have even tried to explain in vein that if there is a dichotomy of many choices and no reason to believe any one of them that any single one is improbable. Yet have been met with unrelenting stupidity in not understanding that to reasonably believe something it must be probable. Yet I constantly get voted against on this very argument. If something only has a 10% chance of being true, it is not reasonable to believe it true, yet this board does not think that is a valid argument against belief in god. We have Man is good who is so stupid he doesn't get basic simple concepts, as we speak he is probably asking: "whats a concept?" That is unrelenting stupidity at its worst. Speaking of this the champion of stupidity on this channel is cerebral narcissist, he doesn't understand definitions like zombie, and fails to recognize his straw man of my arguments for objective morality. Perhaps the greatest irony and act of stupidity on his part is this. He is actually one of the prosecutors. Yet, he claims to be a moral nihilist. We shall show what a moral nihilist is here: Moral nihilism (also known as ethical nihilism or amoralism) is the meta-ethical view that nothing is moral or immoral. For example, a moral nihilist would say that killing someone, for whatever reason, is neither inherently right nor inherently wrong. Moral nihilists consider morality to be make-believe, a complex set of rules and recommendations that may give a psychological, social, or economical advantage to its adherents, but is otherwise not in accord with fact or reality. http://en.wikipedia.org... So following the TOS on here is neither inherently right or wrong to him. Nor would there be any reason what so ever according to him for Innoman to maintain the terms of service. Those choices hold no more weight in a conversation then what flavor ice cream is better to him. This is just laying more incredible stupidity in my face. Faced with this much stupidity, I am morally obligated to lash out on here against the ignorance. So, while our prosecution has no grounds what so ever to say there is any reason to follow the terms of service at all, I argue that my free speech is being violated and that my temporary banning, already proved that in that short time, the board saw a dramatic decrease in usage in the debate.org forum and in the religion forum. (sources both forums). So they argue I harm the site, but my very lack of presence has actually brought a lack of discussion to the forums. The first day or 2 of my temporary banning we did not see the drop because I was the topic of discussion. In conclusion: 1. I have been forced through insurmountable stupidity to lash out as logic does not work 2. My freedom of speech is being violated 3. My opponents have no grounds based on cerebrals moral nihilism to say the TOS should be upheld 4. The site has seen a lack of output since my temporary banning.