Donald Trump and the Republicans will lose the 2020 election.

I will begin by answering your question from two viewpoints. I will begin by answering from my own viewpoint. As someone who does not support Trump's actions, yes. I do condemn him for the actions he has proposed to do. However, if you present that question to a Trump supporter who helped him get where he is today, your question will be laughed off and ignored, and in the eyes of the Trump voter, Trump's actions are far from deplorable; in fact, they are worthy of praise. I have answered your five questions with solid answers in my previous argument and the rendering of my answers as void with the excuse that Trump has a low approval rating is groundless. I will repeat again, despite the vulgar comments he made during the campaign, he defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016. According to FiveThirtyEight's polling data, Trump's likelihood of winning fell from 49% to 28.6%, and yet, he still won. Yes, Trump has an extremely low approval rating, however, only 1% of Trump voters have said that they definitely would not vote for Trump again. You have also stated that his mandate of 'America First' deters voters from voting for him. That concept, which is the base of many of Trump's policies, while flawed, demonstrates Trump's patriotism in an increasing globalised world. This appeals to voters in the rust belt swing states-Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Wisconsin, all which Trump won in 2016, who believe that the free trade agreements such as the TPP and NAFTA have caused their economic woes and the decline of their manufacturing sector. Trump has continued to exploit the frustration of the rust belt and will likely continue to. This helps secure the 64 votes which come from those swing states, which is clearly the opposite of what you have stated. You have also compared Trump's supporters to those who supported Gaddafi and Hitler. You may see the resemblance between 2017 and 1933-1934, but Trump's supporters don't. Democrats or Anti-Trump activists, like yourself, may view the changes happening similar to the increasing authoritarianism of Hitler, but Trump supporters and Republicans don't, as Trump's proposals still have to go through the democratic process in order to be recognized. I fail to see how Trump's early accomplishments reveal flaws in American democracy. The only candidate who referred to his supporters as the 'silent majority' is Donald Trump, who truly are the silent majority. Most millennials, who make up a large chunk of the Democratic support base, freely express their views on social media, while a much smaller portion of middle aged and older voters use social media, from much of Trump's support came from. You have made many false assumptions of the United States solely based on your hatred for Donald Trump. We once again witness another example when you called the United States a 'third world country' and a 'one party state'. It is true, the US has been downgraded to a flawed democracy, but according to the EIU, the organisation which determines those scores, the USA's declining democracy index score is not because of Trump. Their democracy index score has been declining for some time, and even if Clinton won the 2016 election, the US would eventually become a flawed democracy some time during her presidency. Obama's legacy would only have been kept alive by a Clinton victory. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are both Republicans who oppose Obamacare and the Paris Climate Change Agreement. The US is still the leader of the free world, and the United States has been declining as the dominant world power for a long time. You cannot provide a universal definition good populism and bad populism. A conservative may consider Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn as examples of bad populism, while a liberal may consider Donald Trump and Marine le Pen as bad populists. Your proposal of providing a definition of good and bad populism is like saying that the classic rabbit-duck illusion is definitely a duck.