Generation 1 was the Worst Pokemon Generation

I would like to re-rebut some of these claims. . The original Parent Trap movie of 1971 [http://www.imdb.com......] scored higher on IMDB reviews than its 1998 remake http://www.imdb.com...... despite worse technology. That's because its content was superior.Yes, but as you have stated, it was most likely because of superior content. The people didn't like it better because it's technology was worse. I am just pointing out one way these games were inferior. These are considered to be generation 3 games because of an expanded pokedex and an ability tyrade with other generation 3 games, yet in form and function they were generation 1 games, updated to fix the bugs and graphics of the original games.And they are still Generation 3 nonetheless. Generation 3 took what Generation 1 had and improved it. Because of what Generation 3 had in the remakes, Generation 1 loses some of it's value. The content of a piece of entertainment far outweighs any technological disadvantages.Yes, but the disadvantages exist nonetheless. If this was my entire reason, then there'd be a problem. But this is only one reason. These glitches and mistakes in generation 1, though not harmful to the overall game, These glitches majorly affect battling. You could have trouble getting through the Celadon Gym because of the Wrap issue. All of Sabrina's Pokemon in Yellow were Level 50, compared to the Gym Trainers' Pokemon in the 30's. Put that on top of Psychic type's incredible stats and one weakness, and on top of that, the fact that they're ALL members of the Abra line. Sabrina was not just challenging, she was ridiculously overpowered.This doesn't make sense, as Wikipedia is a site that can be edited by all kinds of people. Is there anything wrong in the Wikipedia article I showed? Was there issues? The Internet can be edited by all kinds of people, but we use it. I actually read and fact checked the article to see if it was right.Simplicity, in the case of Pokemon games, is not a bad thing. I agree. But it is better if you can add more to it, while still keeping it Pokemon. That's what the new games have done. They added plots, not overly complicated ones, while still focusing on the main goal of being a Pokemon Champion. They've added something new which can please audiences. Pokemon are primarily children's games. Overly complicating the plot can lead to alienation of the biggest consumer of the Pokemon product. This is increasingly becoming a problem. When has Pokemon had a confusing plot? Please give an example. People who don't like it mash A, but still like the games nonetheless.The original games were what the consumers fell in love with.And they fell in love with the newer games too. Gen 2 is the overall fan favorite, Gen 3 is gaining momentum, and Gen 5 is heavily praised for it's story.Here is a picture of a gaming magazine, Famitsu, which gave Pokemon Black and white a perfect 40/40, an achievement only 21 other games pulled off. (Hard to see, but Pokemon Black and White is third to right.) Argument 7: ReplayabilityAfter you beat the game, the most you can do is fight Mewtwo. Then you move onto another game. Yes, you could battle friends and fill the Pokedex, but that's the same for every Pokemon game. It was so bad, that in Gen 3, they had to make the Sevii Isles. You should still be able to play more after the main game is over.