God is Real

I gave you the names of a few of the most prominent scientists in the history of science. The theories that these scientists, who believed in God, are what your group of "hundreds" of scientists base most of their life's work on. I gave you those names, because I didn't want to type the names of the hundreds of other scientists that DO believe in a Creator God. I was kind of hopeful you would do your own research. Wishful thinking. As far as Einstein, this is what I "Googled" and found in terms of what he believed about God; "Einstein stated in his final letter: 'I am not an atheist.', explaining at one point: "I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal god is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being." According to Prince Hubertus, Einstein said, "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views." Sounds like a believer to me, and he was quite critical, to the point of anger, about people like you. "Science has unanswered questions" is simply another repackaging of "I don't know". It goes both ways. It also tells us nothing new. I'm no smarter after hearing "Science has unanswered questions" than before. Scientists clearly state all the time that if there is a cause and effect to anything, science ought to be able to explain it. Why can't science answer those questions I posed? Belief in a Creator God can. He would be the only possible answer when "science has unanswered questions". Re: The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics Your cut and paste response of the writing on the 2nd law of thermodynamics is baseless. You talk about dumping rubbish into a yard and expanding it to the point everything because some how orderly through this expansion (lol). Yea, and if I throw a couple of paints on the wall, eventually, it would form into the Mona Lisa too, over billions and billions of years, right? How can you present this argument (proving that you don't really know science or its laws, its no wonder you can't conceive a Creator God) if you don't realize that science at first believed that the universe was infinite? It was only later that "science" realized that the universe was expanding (oops), so what is it "expanding" into? Its own infinite-ness? Do you see the folly of your logic and those who support it? Science is wrong, more often than not. And please don't criticize my support of the fathers of science and talk about how long they've been dead and then also quote scientists from the stone age. That's a tad hypocritical and kind of rank amateurish of you as a debater. You didn't respond to a myriad of other questions I presented, experiments that were tested and proven about energy, its qualities (the same qualities that the Bible insist God has) how it relates to this universe, about freed electrons and how energy is timeless, everywhere, all knowing and all powerful. Powerful enough to create matter out of a transformation of other energy....Go on my friend, dig deeper. You will find the answers to the questions that "science can't answer" because in reality, science already has. There is a Creator God and science, more so and than any other religion, proclaims it and loudly. Sources [1] Final Letter From Einstein by Prince Hubertus zu Loewenstein- Wertheim-Freudenberg