Super Smash Brothers Melee is a better title than Super Smash Brothers Brawl

Early Rebuttals - Round 2 & 4 Since this is the final round, I am going to simply get straight to the point and not put any unnecessary things. First, it's time to refute opponent's rebuttals on his round 2 arguments. I never specifically said both Snake and Sonic were added because of fan service. And as any Smash Bros. fan knows, Snake was originally going to be added in as a character in Melee, but was not because Nintendo was already too late in development. To make it up for Konami who "literally begged for Snake to join" [1], they added him automatically as a third-party character in Brawl. Sonic, on the other hand, was the one that was added because of a poll conducted by Nintendo [2] to determine their fans' most preferred third-party character to be added, which resulted in...Sonic. While many characters such as Meta Knight and Ike were not asked to be joined, just like L-cancelling and wavedashing, they are a part of the game and it is Nintendo's decision whether or not a character should be added or omitted - not the fans (even if it pisses people off). Nintendo, just like with other game companies is never going to completely satisfy everyone. Heck, take a look at Smash 4; nobody asked for Palutena or Wii Fit Trainer [3] yet they were added - people only wanted Mega-Man, Little Mac, Mii Fighters, Shulk, and Pac-Man. Clones may be enjoyed but Nintendo still thinks an abundant of clones are bad, and they do their best to avoid putting in alot to the roster, such as taking out clones that were in Melee from Brawl, and taking out many Brawl clones in Smash 4. As said awhile ago, whether or not you disliked Dr. Mario is up to the discretion of Nintendo - they added him as a returning fighter in Smash 4 even if people did not want him back. I admit that I found it stupid as well, but the reality is that only the developers can decide what gets changed to the roster. I also understand that tripping can cost a person a match, but that rarely happens as we all know, and tripping at the most has only made me lose 1 point in timed multi-player matches in Brawl. As I ran out of space in the previous rounds, I will make it up by refuting opponent's arguments of Project M and hint that opponent has avoided many of my arguments, such as Sakurai's apparent claim of Subspace Emissary being a confusing plot and how Subspace Emissary and multi-player is completely inferior to Melee's multi-player and Adventure Mode. I recommend to not avoid arguments simply because you have nothing better to say - either admit that your opponent has won in convincing you, or simply refute them in later rounds like what I am doing right now. I have to admit you are a worthy opponent and I hope to debate with you in the future as you are one of the few to not be trolls *looks at troll debates*. I know what Project M is and how it works, which is all explained in here [4] if you say otherwise. You may have used Smash 64 as a sub-argument, but so have I with Smash 4. I may have used it a bit too much, but I haven't used it as a seperate argument. Opponent may deny this, but according to my original argument, I used it as a sub-argument as I stated that Brawl has exclusives that Melee lacks and that influenced Smash 4. That argument was meant to argue how Brawl had exclusives that Melee never offered, and to make it more effective, I state how Brawl's exclusives are able to influence Smash 4 while Melee's exclusives fail to do that as L-cancelling and all those techniques are still not present [5] despite being claimed to be more like Melee than Brawl. Also, you still continue to drop many of my arguments simply because you refuse to refute them. Here is another wise tip, purposely ignoring certain arguments is a big no-no in actual debates and opponents can use that against you, like what I am doing right now. Current Rebuttals Now let us get on with the final rebuttals. It's exactly as told, you cannot find a source that refers to that, and where is the source you promised me where Sakurai proves that Subspace Emissary's plot is confusing? I never said that you made up Melee tournaments - I simply stated that you provide sources that Project M is used for sources as well as Fox and Falco being favored in tournaments. I recommend you need to take certain things metaphorically and contextually as that is part of my writing style - I should honestly not be telling you this. The source I used to disprove your claim of Falco and Fox's weight refers to both Melee and Brawl...if you can even read properly. I was referring to falling speed - not the running nor combat speed [6]. Again, you should have properly read the source carefully as well as understand the contextual value of my arguments before assuming false information. Opponent has finally also agreed to use more reliable sources as this actually will help you in future debates on this site and in reality when you get into an unlucky debate with a uncooperative person in court for all the wrong reasons. And opponent admits how Melee is only slightly better than Brawl and not completely yet you contradict yourself as you said it was completely superior. Debate Conclusion So it appears that your claims are just opinionated as both the critics and fans claim otherwise. Funny how you spent all this time trying to argue how Melee is completely superior to Brawl, but than your last few rebuttals help my arguments as you state that it is only slightly better than Brawl, which is what I said earlier in this debate; thus, proving that you agree with your opponent - something that you should not be doing in a debate. As this debate is now officially over, let me conclude this debate by thanking my opponent for having this debate with me. I admit that I have not faced such an excellent and worthy opponent in such a long time, as you can tell from my past debates that the majority of debates I had in this recent time is composed of unskilled debaters and trolls. You state that you wish that I was less cocky, but I was not cocky at all during this debate - you assume such false speculations simply because you cannot see my facial expressions and body language; if you could, you would have said otherwise. I ask all judges to vote for me if you think I qualify as the winner, or choose my opponent - I do not care as this seems to be an even debate as my sportsmanship was my main flaw and opponent's questionable sources was his, so please choose wisely. Remember to vote properly, as if you vote with the wrong reasons and I gather enough evidence, I will consider it vote bombing and have the administrators of this site to remove such invalid votes. Only legitimate, honest, and unbiased (in terms of debater, not the game) voters should participate in the vote to prevent abuse and spam. As with previous rounds, here are my sources: [1] + [2] http://en.wikipedia.org... (it is in the "Inclusion of Characters" sub-section) [3] http://nintendoeverything.com... [4] http://www.ssbwiki.com... [5] http://www.ssbwiki.com... [6] http://www.ssbwiki.com... (please read about his falling speed carefully before refuting)