Gun control is a good contributor, if not a necessary factor, to keeping homicides at a lower rate.

All I want to do this round is do a rebuttal of Con's latest argument, oh wait a minute, I meant debate; no that doesn't sound right."Why are you debating with me if you're not even an American citizen?" I knew it, I bloody knew that you would say this. Why am I not allowed to debate a topic I understand, or learn about a topic just because it doesn't affect my country. "And this is a debate, not an argument, but you probably don't know the difference," "a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong." - Google"Debate is contention in argument; dispute, controversy; discussion; especially the discussion of questions of public interest in parliament or in any assembly," I think it is you that doesn't know what each means and what each can be used for."Also, did you really mention Korea? Really? While we're at it, why don't you mention Syria or any northern country in Africa?" Do you not understand the difference between North and South Korea? I take it you meant North Korea in the way you are reffering it to Syria. Anyway, this isn't about their political fundamentals, it is about the correlation between gun restrictiveness and gun homicides. "does that mean we should ban cars, or how about gas, so that the cars don't work anymore, because that's what's happening." ...Cars are not designed to kill people, guns are. Since the creation of cars, people have trying to make them safer. Since the creation of guns however, people have been trying to make them deadlier. Granted we have put a safety knob, but on cars we make the safety knob permanently on safe."To me it sounds like you're validating robbery." Really? Because to me, It sounded like I was making the point that robbers tend to go to houses without people in them, so the argument for guns using robbers would be invalid. "especially if the intruder has a gun"And how did he get that gun? Legally? Here is a thought: If guns were illegal, it would be easier to know who is carrying a gun illegally; all those carrying guns."You say there is more than one way to defend yourself, okay, I understand this. Let's put you in a ring with nothing but a knife, a revolver with 6 shots, and an AR-15 with a 30 round magazine and see which one you choose when there are 6 lions thrown into the ring, armed with razor-sharp claws and teeth the size of your hand. Choose wisely."Urh! Don't you hate it when that happens! It's so common, especially in America. But seriously, what a strange situation."1. a rule or set of rules, enforceable by the courts, regulating the government of a state, the relationship between the organs of government and the subjects of the state, and the relationship or conduct of subjects towards each other2.a. See statute law a rule or body of rules made by the legislatureb. See bylaw a rule or body of rules made by a municipal or other authority3.a. the condition and control enforced by such rulesb. ( in combination ): lawcourt4.a rule of conduct: a law of etiquette5.one of a set of rules governing a particular field of activity: the laws of tennis"Why TF did you have explain this to me? It had no purpose. Explain. EXPLAIN!"a law doesn't prevent crime from happening."So true, which is why I think that we should abolish all laws because they don't actually prevent crime, RIGHT?"Do you know how a poll works? It adds up to 100%, and last time I checked, 67+58=/=100, it actually equals 125, so I would check your sources again."The Joke is on you. Here is the full table.Protection Against Crime 67%Target Shooting 66%Hunting 58% You see, some of the people said they owned the gun for more than one reason. One person used guns for all purposes, another for only two, another for one. I'll make it clearer in future if you want. "I hope you learned something from this"So do I to you. "and you learn that what you're advocating is wrong" You know, humility is a virtue. "and it will only lead to more death and destruction if you continue."And if you had used evidence to show this instead of dawdling on other things, I might have actually learned something.Gun control has been proven to be a good contributor, If not a necerssary factor to keeping homicide rates low by the relationship between the gun restrictiveness and homicides; Countries like south Korea and Japan have higher restrictiveness and lower homicides while countries like Honduras had low restrictiveness (causing desperate measures to be taken place) and high homicides.One note, the Con should not be allowed to post another argument in round 5 because he wrote an argument in round 1 even though he wasn't meant too. He shall say, "no round as agreed upon," and if he doesn't, i'll, i'll....It doesn't matter because I know he doesn't think laws prevent crime.http://en.wikipedia.org...https://www.google.com...;