Atheism is more rational then Theism

I would also like to mention that I requested a final round to rebuttal Pro, seeing as it is Pro's burden of proof to establish the resolution true, I have been accused of cowardice for this request, and nothing could be further from the truth. Anyhow I will continue and see how it goes. I will now begin refuting my opponents argument, My opponent states, "One thing that really gets me on most Theistic arguments is that they can be used to prove any god. So, even you prove that a god exists, which one is really the one? " Above my opponent reasons that most theistic arguments can be used to prove any God, I do not actually agree with this, but by my opponents own admission, She believes that, MOST theistic arguments can Prove a God is there, but just not which God out of the many people proclaim. By this reasoning, that most theistic arguments prove God, then it would be more rational to believe in God rather than lack belief in God, which is what atheism entails. So here we see Pro has negated her own resolution. Although I could end my argument here, and not continue, I will extend my argument and try to clarify a few questions that Pro put forward. .. To begin with, Which God out of all the Gods people proclaim, is the real God. First I would like to mention what classical theism accepts about Gods attributes, God is an absolute complete being, in other words, He is infinite, and also self sufficient is power. Absolute means no separation, So absolutely everything is Gods energy, either directly or indirectly, what do I mean when I say either directly or indirectly? Well just like when I use a microphone to speak through and my voice comes out of the speakers, that is my separated energy, also I would like to give another example How God can be Simultaneously one and different with His creation. And I would like to use the sun globe to portray my analogy. .. .. I would like my opponent and the audience to consider the sun and the sunshine, Both are the same in quality but different in quantity, the sunshine is an expansion or extension of the sun, and both share the same chemical qualitative attributes, they are in effect non different in chemical qualitative attributes, only in quantity. The sunshine being an expansion of the sun is able to be everywhere simultaneously, ( with the exception to night and day in different countries, but you get the gist) And the sun is situated mighty in a single spot, This is how God is able to be everywhere and yet be situated in a single spot, Although the sunshine is an extension of the sun and shares the same chemical qualitative attributes as the sun, they are still different. Example: If the sun globe entered your window, you would be foolish to believe the sunshine entered your window. .. .. .. This analogy shows how God is able to be one, yet different with His creation using his separated energy, Which is inconceivably one and different. Now back to the question of which God is which, in my opinion there is only one God, because God is to defined in the very least, as Supreme, Supreme means highest in rank, But out of all Gods proclaimed by man, which is the real God? , Well if God is infinite, meaning endless and self sufficient in power, then he is able to manifest into innumerable different entities using His separated energy and still remain a single entity, So in effect they can all be God or part of Gods separated energy. Just like gold is used to fashion different objects. .. .. It is said that God is one who became many and so started the creation, so in effect nothing can exist outside of God or independently from God, so everything IS God or a part of his separated energy. Inconceivably one and yet different with creation. .. I thank the audience for sticking with me thus far and also thank my opponent and look forward to her response. .. . Many thanks.