god persecutes gays, Blasphemers, Adulterers, Those that work on the sabbath, Don't worship him etc

Hello once again, Dear reader! It is the 5th round, And we can both finally stop wasting our time! Let's get into it: "You completely lack all morals, And you go into absolute denial, And you do not understand what anybody says to you which means that in no possible way, Can you understand you bible. " My opponent fails to mention how I lack morals. Just because terrible stuff happens in the Bible the I believe in does not mean that I believe in those bad things. As I said to my opponent, I answered no to all of his questions. "Why not apologize for living? " So now my opponent proclaims that he hates me and that I should not live. Mature. "I"m very proud of being erratic, But its your storybook god who is racist bigoted pig who only chooses those that believe in him which he should choose everybody. " God is not racist, And there is no evidence of him being racist in the bible. He gave Jesus Christ, His son, Up to the WHOLE world. How can he be racist? However, My opponent called me racist slurs in the previous round, And he is racist. My point still stands. "'Yes, And for 43+ years he has been losing. ' Never, Not once against christians. Take one lucky guess why oh great god of toxic waste? That"s right, Its because you cannot prove that your god nor christ has ever existed. " He says he has never lost against Christians, And yet, Out of all 130 of his debates, He has lost a whopping 75 times! And almost every single loss was on a topic about God or religion. He has only participated in 5 debates that were not on those subjects. Also, It is not my job to prove that God exists. The topic is whether God is immoral or not, And that is what I have argued. " In the Bishop"s bible, The one before the KJV, The word "Tyrant" was used I don"t know how many times (its at least 400 from what completed records show) and then in the KJV that was replaced by "King" The Bishop's Bible was produced under the authority of the Church of England, And it was not the first translation. "The words "evil" and "disaster" and "bad" and "calamity" are completely 4 completely different words that have 0% of nothing to do with each other and completely change the meaning of the verses. " Reader, Look up "evil define" in Google. Bad is a synonym for evil. Now look up "calamity define" in Google. Disaster is a synonym for calamity. As to the reason why they are separated, It is because bad and evil are adjectives while disaster and calamity are nouns. The dictionary cannot group ALL four as synonyms because they are in different parts of speech and therefore cannot completely replace one another. "NOW SHUT YOUR YODELING GRUNGE BRAIN OFF! " Creative insult, Backwardseden! Do you spend all day thinking these up? " There"s no possible way that you have genuine friends or loved ones that would die for you. Try flatly lying to someone else. " I have never been in death's way, So how could I know if my loved ones and friends would take a bullet for me? Word and word alone is not enough, So by you saying that you have friends who would, That means that they have gone to the hospital before to protect you. In that case, It is terrible that you would expect your friends to take your pain for you all the time. ""My opponent says I have no evidence, Yet I do, " no sorry, You don"t. All you have is your bible. " My Bible is not the only piece of evidence that I used. I also used plain logic. But you know that, Diligent reader! "You"ve been arguing with omar2345 all day who"s utterly destroyed you because you cannot---pay---attention---to---what---he---says and thus respond intelligently. He"s got patience for someone like you. I don"t. Now since you"ve been arguing with him all day, It also means that you"ve had the time to watch the videos that have been posted in RD2. ALL OF THEM. YOU HAVE NO EXCUSES. Oh you know what else I learned in college? There are no excuses. I ---never--- invent excuses. I take responsibility for myself, For who I am. You don't. " My argument with omar2345 is completely irrelevant to this debate, Reader. However, The claim that since I've been arguing with him all day means that I had the time to watch the videos he posted is actually valid (finally, I was waiting forever! ). But I was able to argue with omar2345 because I could take 2 minutes or so to argue with him and go back to my work. I cannot spend 30+ minutes watching 10 videos and responding to them, It would take to much time! I told my opponent to provide a brief synopsis of the videos if he wanted me to respond to them, But he did not, So I could not because that would take too much time out of my day. "Oh there"s so many atrocities that your god has committed. " Yet my opponent refuses to provide any of these. I have already responded to the ones he said in round one, But allow me to restate. God said those things in the OLD covenant. We are now in the NEW covenant. Besides this, People had the option to sacrifice animals daily to get rid of their sins. "'Yet I answered those questions back in round one. ' Nope. Sorry. Try again. Just read it. God, Strap yourself to a concrete parachute. " He admits that I said no to the questions twice, And then denied that I answered them. Indecisive much? And then he proceeds to ask me to kill myself. Because everyone knows that the best debating tactic is encouraging your opponents to commit suicide (that is sarcasm for those picky voters out there). "If a man also lie with mankind, As he lieth with a woman, Both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death;? Why no my opponent does not. Therefore he breaks the law of his god and thus does not follow his god"s laws, Rules and regulations. " By death, God means death in the spirit and therefore a sentence to Hell. He does not tell his followers to go kill the LGBTQ+ community, And anyone who does so is wrong and has wrongly interpreted the Bible. "Extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence. God is extraordinary. You did not provide evidence. Bye! " I did provide evidence, As I just said, Reader. Also, My opponent once again finally said something that is true! That is that "God is extraordinary. " That is very true, He is. I encourage all of the readers to return and look back at my evidence that I said, And then to go and look at my opponent's. Who will you vote for, The guy who responded to everything and provided evidence (me), Or the guy who spends almost all of his time restating old arguments and insulting both me and God (backwardseden)? I ask that you vote for me, Not even because you agree with me, But because I debated properly and fairly, And my opponent did not. Thank you for taking the time to read this, Even though it was a waste for all parties involved, And I hope you have a terrific day!