Joy of Satan

There are two kinds of Satanists. There are those who literally worship Satan as the "True Father," and those who are atheist, and wear Satanism as a badge. This of course is borderline FASHION. Related to Fascism etymologically speaking" Today"s subject is the theistic Satanist. And we will use "Joy of Satan" Ministries as a prime example of modern "Theistic" Satanism, though not conclusive, as "Joy of Satan Ministries" can only be used as a primer to show how illogical conclusions are rampant among this diverse cult base where every individual seems to have their own belief system, as it"s more convenient and sugar coating to allow one to create their own belief system. That"s fine. Let"s take a look at this web venue, Joy of Satan Ministries, because it seems to express a base philosophy that is rampant in nearly all theistic as well as atheistic Satanist "Ministries" today, reaching far into the works of Zechariah Sitchin and Michael Tsarion... and other likes" Illogical contradictions are what appear to me to be persistent among these people"s understanding, theistic or not. And you might disagree with me, and that"s fine, I"m not looking for a debate, this is simply the way I see it. When I was in High School, I had a copy of Lavey"s book and I read it front to back. The first and primary contradiction that appears to be prevalent in all these different theistic Satanic sects and what their "leaders" present is this: They worship Satan as the Truth and the Light, the True Father of humanity and that all religions are actually the enemy of mankind. I"ll respect that as their belief because I despise most religion, and won"t tread on that basic principle or tenet of their philosophy. My problem is when they say that Satan represents the Truth and the LIGHT" and they always use symbols of DARKNESS to portray him. A goat? The Biblical symobl of the scapegoat? The colors of black and red, death and blood? Black is a void. Not life or light. Light is WHITE. They actually use the same symbols that the Abrahamic religions have used to condemn them, of blood and black and red, to portray their "Father" who they claim represents LIGHT, and state that instead, this portrayal of dark black robes, and the head of a goat surrounded by fire and brimstone and death, instead of doves and rainbows and butterflies, are symbols of goodness, like a snake is a symbol of wisdom. But how is the excessive use of the death-head colors black and red, and sometimes a toxic green and vain purple all of a sudden supposed to represent the lighter colors of white and light blue and life-giving green? An evil-looking goat with red eyes that looks like it"s about to eat you is NOT the symbol of good, and all the Satanic Theistic Sects use it. Why isn"t there a Satanic Sect that uses the color of blooming morning glory instead, if they want to say they represent the Truth and Light? Why use black to represent light? It"s a JOKE. To take it a little further, the Joy of Satan Ministries says that, "they"re not about EVIL." Well, if that"s True, than how come when we scroll down a little further we see that under the "Satanic Witchcraft" section, we find a spell on, "How to Deliver the EVIL Eye?" If you"re not about EVIL than why are you trying to teach people how to deliver an EVIL eye? I won"t pursue the point, I"ll just leave it to you to meditate on and decide for yourself. I find it obviously contradictory that they state they aren"t about evil, and then try to teach you how to deliver the "evil eye." And also how they use black and blood red and colors of darkness, to represent the light. Any of the Satanic Theists you find on the internet are claiming to be messengers of Light, while using colors of darkness to portray themselves. It"s ridiculous. How can anyone believe this utter crap? If we look up the origins of the word evil, it doesn"t make sense why they would apply them to something that represents Truth and Light, which they claim they represent. The Etymology Dictionary says the word evil, Old English "yfel" means basically "bad, vicious, ill, wicked," and further if you wish to look it up yourself. That"s what the word has always meant, so if you are good and want to represent the Truth and the Light, you can"t be castin" no evil eyes, period. You can"t have it both ways, and say you are good and yet use evil to achieve your agenda of revenge. There is also according to the Etymology Dictionary the concept of Evilly, or the Evil eye (Latin oculus malus) which was Old English eage yfel. The jocular notion of an evil twin, as an excuse for regrettable deeds, from an old motif in mythology. Why are they using these terms if they obviously by definition contradict what they are trying to represent? To give them the benefit of the doubt at this point would be difficult after reading the dictionaries and encyclopedias. Unless they"re creating new meanings for words and defining them how they want to" How about I redefine the word good as evil. Good actually means evil now everyone so get it right. It"s ridiculous. Michael Jackson sang that he was "bad" and everyone thought it meant he was "cool," and people say no means yes. No, it doesn"t. The difference is, that was a trend, this is not. It"s all about fascion. So, if we read further, in the preposition regarding the JOS Ministry in particular, it states in the "About" section, we read that, "Satan does not in any way fit the Judeo/Christian or Muslim descriptions that have falsely defined him for so long, nor does he conform to the character depicted of him in Anton LaVey"s, "Satanic Bible." So if that"s True, than how come the very cover of the "Satanic Bible," uses the same image of Satan, the goat, that modern theistic Satanists use to represent their belief system? I"m sure this will delve into a more cryptic answer, but the obvious and blatant is the obvious and blatant. Joy of Satan claims Anton LaVey"s Satanic Bible uses a false image, the goat, but JOS uses the EXACT same symbolism" Again, not making sense, and therefore appearing to be a blatant hypocrisy and dumb. Then again maybe this was all part of the plan to deliver these poor lost souls back into the heart of Rome. And my final misunderstanding, as I"ll call it under the benefit of the doubt, is that JOS says, "THE CHRISTIAN CHURCHES HAVE BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS. IN ORDER FOR SATANISM TO ADVANCE, MONEY IS NEEDED." The donate button is not difficult to see. I"m not sure why something representing real Truth would need money, God don"t need cash". but these guys believe that He does too. Then at the bottom of the page an image appearing to be a Skull with horns is portrayed, rather than a dove and a rainbow, the colors of light, no, the colors of blood and death, yes, and who wants that? Nobody wants that. Now there is some interesting research on JOS, but I have to say, Maxine Dietrich, shut up ya f"n douchebag. Nobody believes you, except these teens who have nobody to love them. Yes, she has a separate site for teens who have no one to love them but Father Satan, totes lame, a way to take advantage of young people who feel alone and rejected by society, especially by a society dominated by religious dogma and bigotry. Kids, this material, in my opinion, is piss, and some of you might like piss, but whatever. I just think it"s dumb, my own personal opinion, maybe you feel that Maxine is you"re light at the end of the tunnel, but my advice is don"t get caught up in all the research presented by this organization and focus on the basic principles it presents, and you will see, it"s ridiculous, absolutely. But again that"s just my own personal opinion. Believe whatever you want to, you have free will, it won"t affect me or anyone else regardless because to people like me it"s lame and a trend overdue of it"s own demise.