The deregulated "free" market is unsustainable

It appears I'm going to have to make some clarifications.. 1. When stating there being an alarming growth of an intertwining system of both the private sector (i.e. Wall street) and the government.. That addresses the issue of a too powerful private sector and NOT government. But con simply does not view it this way because he clearly is a lover the Reagan mentality of government. (Little side track:Probably one of the most overrated U.S. presidents...ever) Meaning that, no matter how overpowering of a hold corporate America has on it's federal government, he does not, will not, nor will he ever view this as a problem of private enterprise. He will view it as a problem of federal government. Thus showing this little feud is really just a matter of misconception. 2. Con stated the markets hold producers accountable because apparently in every "free market transaction", both parties benefit. Yikes. I would hope that con really was meaning for that statement to be directed to domestic transactions, if so, that he may have a point. However, on foreign transactions, occurring between impoverished nations and our dangerously overpowering private sectors I'm afraid he's wrong. Certain terms come up when talking about foreign transactions with our private industries.. Slave labor.. Human Trafficking.. Terms that really I would hope that the general public would consider bad and certainly NOT a benefit by any means. I hate to over use an example but hey when talking about the harms of the free market, of course your going to come across Walmart quite frequently. http://humantrafficking.change.org... Also some other great links with relevance to labor- http://www.humantrafficking.org... http://ihscslnews.org... http://www.free2work.org... http://www.hrea.org... And thirdly Con has expressed his feeling about my comments towards Tea-Baggers fallowing up with an unnecessary rant about Obama and I'm guessing insinuating that I am one of his "Pinko-Commi Allies" and there for, should be outed as such. Well, to clarify I did not mention the president ONCE in my opening statement nor did I ever applaud any particular action under his administration. Matter in fact, I happen to think Obama is quite the poor president as well, but for obviously very different reasons. Yes Obama is a major tool to Wall street that's a pretty well known piece of knowledge. And as far as foreign policy goes, the difference between him and bush are practically invisible. I'm sure con believes Obama is a "far-left" president with a "socialist" agenda.. Well I'm here to tell you, as someone who considers them self to be a pretty far left individual and have a rather socialist ideology, that President Barrack Obama is not far left by any means. He is bullsh*t artist of a politician, who is a horrible centrist and is in fact a faux-liberal and runs under the title of being a "revolutionary". To say that Obama is a tool to corporate America and Wall street, and at the same time call him a socialist are two very contradicting claims. He CLEARY favors big business just as usual for every American president. And if you think just running my mouth, here's an article of out spoken ACTUAL socialists who debunk that notoriously retarded of a claim. http://www.politicsdaily.com... Now lets get back on topic: Is the deregulated free market sustainable? In order to believe that it is in fact sustainable for humanity then you must have some certain beliefs. You would have to beleif that profit motivation is the best means of motivation for society. I argue that it's actually quite unhealthy for society and leads to very unnecessary problems. Another mind set one must have in order to defend the deregulated "free" market of being sustainable for humanity is to have a major distrust towards government and a love affair for private enterprise. (Might I point out a government that has a constitution and a promise to promote the general welfare.) I'm going to summarize a short list of examples that will elaborate my "grass-root" argument of making the case that the deregulated free-market is in fact UNSUSTAINABLE. a. Grows a manipulated generation of masses that in affect harm society and do not participate nor practice democracy. http://tvnewslies.org... b. Has a repeating history of anti-trust violations and sound frequency of unlawful acts to society. http://www.corporatewatch.org... c. Places profits before people. http://www.personsinc.org... d. Manipulates the public opinion and the very aspect of the life. http://www.adbusters.org... e. Uses think-tanks and lobbying to in a sense create a war on democracy. http://www.prwatch.org... f. Undermines journalism. http://foxbghsuit.com... g. Breeds poverty. http://www.socialistalternative.org... Now as a last statement, I would just like to point out that to see proof of our current system not being sustainable can be done by just a self evaluation. Look at your life, how big of a role do corporations play in it? And ask yourself, In a world were we slap prices on LIVING NECESSITIES, (emphases on the LIVING aspect..) is that by any means just or moral? And can we pursue such a society that primary revolves around the almighty dollar?