Homos should be allowed to get married in church

Remember, remember, the 6th of December. Thank you.I accept my BOP which does not exist because Pro actually has the BOP I was just pretending I had the BOP to play with Pro because Pro is my friend. Pro must prove that homos should be allowed to marry in churches, ktnxbai.Lol jk, I'm back.In this debate I shall be defending seven contentions: The psychological implications of such a societal decision far outweigh the pros. Science has proven that homos don't exist. Homosexuals are gay Hipsters are homos. Hipsters do not exist. Therefore hipsters should not be allowed to marry in churches. And freedom of religion and all that. IntroductionHomosexuality is gay and gays have lisps sometimes and robots are boss.Homos?What's a homo? I don't know, Should?Pro must prove that morality is objective and that not only is it objective but that objective morality dictates that homos should be allowed to marry in churches in order to fullfill his BOP.Be allowed? What for?To get married?What is marriage? Marriage is but a word, my friend. Words are meaningless unless a meaning is assigned to them. Sounds are merely sounds and that's fact. As The_Fool_On_The_Hill would say, SOUND IS THE FOOL! Or something like that.In Churches?Which churches? Pro has not defined what churches he's talking about thus I shall define churches to mean robot churches.Robot religions and robot churches should be for robots only because humans are not robots. Robots should have the right to freedom of religion and their robot religions exclude humans because humans are not robots. Therefore to preserve freedom of religion homos should not be allowed to marry in churches. [1]The Pyschological Implications... Etc.In contrast to the diabological nature of the eristogatically contingent nature of the echolon we homo sapiens assign ourselves too. The aesthetic quality of the robotic society defines itself as being that which is better then all homos. This relates to the non-deterministic nature of Quantum Mechanics in that while visible beings follow the laws of cause and effect the probabilistic nature of wavelength proves that not all things are set in stone. Of course, one could argue that this is only true when looking through the arbitrary lens of the Copenhagen version but I think my opponent and I can agree to dismantle this approach and come at this subject with fresh minds alive with the smell of rasberry lemonade (I do love tea in the morning).Furthemore, when one understands how 1 can not be divided by 0 in calculas we can see that 0 simply does not exist! But if 0 does not exist how can 1 exist? And if homos are many 1's, how can homos exist? None of us exist! We are all the product of our own imaginations. We are walking paradox's. We are the preverbial fish in a barrel being shot at by the societal construct that is San Fransisco. Curses. Oh yes, curses.But the problematic dissimulation of reality does not end here! For while relevancy escapes the potency of such actions in relation to my own two fists slamming this here keyboard with the ferocity of a thousand lions pissed off because no one gave them their f***ing food, the contingency of such understandings do not follow! Nothing logically follows because nothing is logical. Ex nihilo is merely a word for homeless men. The light that penetrates our pupils only does so because we imagine it to be so. But our pupils only exist because we imagine them to exist, and we only imagine our pupils to exist because we imagine our brains to exist! But without our brain how can we imagine ourselves to exist? Therefore God exists.Therefore if we allow homos to marry in churches the circular pattern will be broken in that our imagination will cease to exist which will result in us ceasing to exist. Also, humans do not exist. We just think we do. We are in fact holograms.Hipsters Do Not ExistA hipster is someone who likes vintage stuff. However, one can only be a hipster if that person assigns oneself to be hipster meaning that I am only hipster if I say I am hipster. But hipsters never say that they are hipster [2]! They always say that other people are hipsters! In fact, it is against the definition of hipster to admit that you are hipster! But you can only be hipster if you admit that you are hipster!Therefore hipsters do not exist.Things that don't exist shouldn't be allowed to marry in robot churches.Would you let a flying unicorn get married in your church? Hmm? No? I rest my case.[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://www.urbandictionary.com...