BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Capitalism (Reboot)

Capitalism Is Contradictory To ItselfCapitalism is a very contradictory system. One major example being the supply and demand function. More specifically, how it affects the economy. Supply and demand change how the economy is performing, if demand is low for food, food supply increases and as does the population, then the supply of food goes down and the prices go up, causing mass starvation and poverty. With all of it's contradictions, Capitalism will destroy itself. This was predicted by Karl Marx, and after 2008, it's started to show true. Capitalism contains its own destruction. In their chase for profits, businesses trade workers for machines. "The higher return on capital means that the share of profits rises and the share of wages falls, and soon the mass of the population isn't earning enough to buy the goods capitalism produces. " - IQSquared2. Capitalism Calls For Immoral BehaviorIt can be argued that government intervention will prevent immoral behavior in a Capitalist society, but Capitalism will yet rely on famine and war to control the population. Not just this, but the above statement that supply and demand causes starvation and poverty is also immoral. Not just this, but you have to educate people to accept hierarchy, which then causes miniature hierarchies on a daily basis. To be more specific, bullying, assault, and even murder are direct results of poverty affecting the population.3. Hierarchy Is UnnaturalHumans don't like to be oppressed, but if hierarchy were natural then surely we'd be okay with it, right? Not just that, but inequality actually causes many health problems, one of the more extreme outcomes being death. This proves that hierarchy, which is intrinsic to Capitalism, is entirely unnatural and that humans are much more altruistic.4. Capitalism Benefits The. .. Benefited? In Capitalism, there are always at least two classes: the working class and the rich. The rich are usually those who own the means of production privately, otherwise known as the capitalists. The working class are those who must sell their ability to work to live. Capitalism gives capital, which is usually currency, to the rich, and further widens the socioeconomical gap between the rich and the working class. E. G. : Person A owns 50 acres of farming land. Persons B, C, and D all own 15 acres of farming land. Person A has much more capital than persons B, C, and D, thus allowing for person A to make persons B, C, and D work for person A, granting person A more capital. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Citations:1. . http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk...2. . http://libcom.org...;3. . http://inequality.org...
Capitalism (Reboot)

After some issues with our first go, we agreed to try again with this debate. As before, I will be arguing against Capitalism and hierarchy. The Capitalism I will be arguing against is regular Capitalism, that of which has not been edited, or "root Capitalism." Format:Round 1 -- Opening Statements/Settling of Positions and AcceptanceRound 2 -- ArgumentsRound 3 -- RebuttalsRound 4 -- Closing Statements/Summarizing Arguments and Final Thoughts Rules:1. No insulting (Ad Hominem)2. Proper Grammar and Spelling is Appreciated3. Keep the Debate on the Topic of Capitalism4. Breaking Format (Without Proper Reason) Is Automatic Forfeit5. Sources are considered credible not by popularity but by the logic and reason that they use. Terms/Definitions:1. Capitalism - An economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.2. Hierarchy - The process by which at least one person has authority over another person(s). This authority is not necessarily natural, but can be in certain instances.I look forward to debating you and I hope you accept the terms.
Yarn bombing

People find it annoying? Well, jeez, in that case, we might as well lock up all the artists! "Hey! You were hired by this shop-owner to draw a mural on the shop's outside wall? You're coming with me, you degenerate!" - "Excuse me, are you seriously painting a heart on this memorial for your dead friend that died in a car accident just weeks ago? Sorry, but you're getting cuffed." Also, no one is going to yarn-bomb my belongings because it's an expression of art, so it's most likely done in public. Even when it's done in public, they're usually still doing it on public property. I'm not debating that there are people that take it way too far, every type of group has that radical nature come forth sooner of later, but most of the people that yarn-bomb do it on public property. Trees, street-lamps, rails, et cetera. Maybe we should lock up everyone for being their own person; I mean, expressing one's personality through different styles of art that may or may not be colorful, fun and engaging? That's ludicrous! Lock everyone up, everyone should just never express themselves! "Oh, god! Stop! You're making colorful art on a tree and that makes me mad! I'm calling the authorities! Hello, 911? There's yarn everywhere! God, it's so colorful and knitted tightly around this tree... we'll never get this off, it's permanent! It's defacement! It's disrespectful! Oh, god, why did it have to be yarn of all things.. my life is ruined." It's yarn, dude. Honestly making such a big deal out of something so little is ridiculous. I mean, you're focusing your efforts on one form of art, but you're leaving out a whole other spectrum of expressive entertainment. What about the pothole gardens? What about statues erected in public property? Why are these art forms allowed, but a little yarn is not?
Yarn bombing

Yes, that is exactly what I meant by "yarn bombing." Rebuttal 1: "it's colorful" There are plenty of other colorful things to do. Paint, do a fan made comic book, play paintball, etc. In fact, some people are anti-yarn bombing, and as proven by MatPat, the host of Game Theory, a negative opinion about yarn bombing was the origin of the basic idea for Kirby's Epic Yarn. Rebuttal 2: "it's not harmful to the environment" No, but some people actually find it annoying, even though they know it is not permanent. They still consider if defacement. For example, what if some random person yarn bombed your house inside and out? Or if they even yarn bombed your fence and your garden or all your TVs and game consoles? Would you like to see your car yarn bombed? I think not. Rebuttal 2: "it's fun" One can use that as an argument in favor of anything. Does that make everything ok? No. Rebuttal 3: "It's something for people to do with their left-over yarn or knitting projects." There are plenty of other things to do with them. You could turn it into shoelaces when them old ones are worn out, turn it into streamers, use them to replace anything string, or use it for anything yarn-themed. Rubuttal 4: it's not permanent... and can be taken down within two minutes" That is good, especially for people who are anti-yarn bombing.
Yarn bombing

Since the original poster gave literally no description or background for what 'yarn bombing' is, allow me to take the time to note exactly what this concept is. Yarn Bombing is a form of graffiti or street-art that employs colorful displays of crocheted yarn instead of the normal paint/chalk graffiti. For example, there may be a sleeve of yarn around a tree branch in the middle of public; this is yarn-bombing. Now for my argument: It's yarn. As simple as it is to say that, I feel like the simplicity of it is perfect for this debate. It's not harmful to the environment, it's colorful, it's fun, and it's something for people to do with their left-over yarn or knitting projects. It's not permanent either and can be taken down within two minutes.
Which car is better: A Bugatti or a Lamborghini? Con is for Lamborghini

Different types of cars do different things and different cars within that genre of cars have more to offer than others. The Bugatti is a exotic or "super" car used for racing or just for show. The Bugatti is superior to a Lamborghini in speed, looks, and overall capability. The fastest Lamborghini is the Lamborghini Aventador SV is faster on the track then any Bugatti. While it may be faster on the track, however, the Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is faster in a straight line. Exotic cars such as the Bugatti and Lamborghini are more often used for drag racing, which is racing in a straight line shifting gears to gain more speed. The reason for this is to keep the cars in higher condition due to their heavy price and fragile parts. This means that a Bugatti would be more reliable in the world of speed. Many people state that a Lamborghini looks better than a Bugatti. While a Lamborghini does look very futuristic and quite expensive it also looks like a spaceship. The Bugatti is a car just as the Lamborghini is and that is why it looks like a car and not something Elon Musk would send to space. It also has a very dangerous build compared to the Bugatti.
There is no proof of a deity (God)

Look around you. Everything from the heavens to the earth was created by something or someone out there. We all long for something in our lives, to fill that void in our hearts that makes us feel so empty inside. This is not a void that money, fame, or anything else will every be able to fill. This is a hunger and thirst for a righteous God, because whether we recognize it or not, we need him and we can't live without him. You were made with a hunger and a thirst for something greater than yourself...we all are.
Budgeting should be taught in schools

Ninety-three percent of Americans believe all high school students should be required to take a class in financial education. And yes, teens themselves want to learn money management skills. Eighty-six percent of teens indicate they"d rather learn about money management in a class before making mistakes in the real world. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke summarized the need for financial education nicely in the summer of 2012: "Financial education supports not only individual well-being, but also the economic health of our nation " Consumers who can make informed decisions about financial products and services not only serve their own best interests, but collectively, they also help promote broader economic stability." Teachers and parents alike know it"s important to make learning relevant for teens. Fortunately, managing money is not a responsibility exclusive to adults. Managing money is already relevant to most of today"s teens. Many teens have jobs and pay taxes, and need to know how to fill out basic tax forms and file for themselves. They often have money from an allowance or a job and can open savings and checking accounts. Many high school students purchase automobiles and automobile insurance on their own. Teens are considering how to pay for college. Bear in mind that student debt is nearly impossible to discharge and has grown to over $1 trillion nationally, exceeding credit card debt. Teens shop, and some even pay routine bills for items such as cell phones, or they assist with their family"s bills. Exposing teens to strategies to better themselves financially is a 21st century survival skill. Teens deserve to be introduced to complicated financial concepts by caring teachers charged with preparing them to make wise and informed decisions. If we teach teens the skills they need today to manage their money tomorrow, we stand to improve their lives, our lives as parents and teachers and the economy of our country.
Rap Battle

Alright, I never got a response. Looks like this battle is over. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~He forfeits twice, morphed into morbid micegrab the dice and spray colder than alaskin icewrists frozen, looking like the polar expressI told him, we bowling, and I roll with the bestUnlike my opponent, I never quit when I battleyou can call me the sheep dog, herdin' his cattleaustralian shepherd - from the land of the convictsliontooth in this booth, his body was covered in paw printsIt's like bigfoot, his victory over me is non-existenthe took a pic but even with photoshop failed to fix italways coming out fuzzy with nothing that was solidif he himself was a problem, it looks like I solved itReady for the next, cuz this chump got beathe's stupider than a redneck who humps on sheepthem good ole' boys would make him squeel like a piggyhe ran away because he knew I keep it real like I'm Biggie #RIP
Rap Battle

He wants to compare rods to see whose is the biggerI'll break it down real easy - he's the cracker, I'm the --------figure- it out, my rhyme patterns speak for themselfI don't even have to type it, my lines sneak with the stealthYou couldn't hide from my attacks if you hid in the shelfIt's like Santa Clause on steroids, rage-hitting an elfI kick with ferocity and stop only when your crying my namefrying the lame, chop him up and freeze-dry this guy outta the gameI'll map you out, like the Spanish did to the souththe crap you spout is worthless dribble equival to a babies pouta shameless route, whispering to drown the shoutthe rain is out, my flow is a hurricane to end your droughtYou complimented my style like your admitting defeatyour like the wet grass I pull off the grains of my cleatsSaying that I'm poor without knowing bout healthbecause an enemy within is not true inner wealthYou seem to be struggling between a little boy and a wannabeyou should have never dived in now your swimming in a piranha seaI'll chop you up with my razor teeth and leave only bloodyour rhymes are equivalent to crud like a leaf in the mudyou never spit anything that's slightly worth a repeatingyour like that simple minded dog that comes back for a beatingnever know where I'm sleeping, I'm creeping and coming upyour only hope is if I forfeit, so keep quacking, mr. duck
Rap Battle

Wow man, ill give you this your rhymes your sick, but all of that makes no sense, i have your girl on my d**k, yeah, im the pick, now go back to where you came from you worthless hick. God, fakes like you, bout to get rid of you like hitler with the jews, man to good for this s**t, keep on talking your gonna get hit. You said your an OT god, only cuz u have them mods,now please, lets just compare our rods, see whos the bigger man, whos cooler without the fan. Man, my shine is so rapid, b****s cant even map it, im in my bentley, your in your ford, guess what sun, your girl is a whore, you just to poor, and im just to rich, your skill is about as good as your d**k, yes, i went there, but thing is, you cant even see down there with all that hair! my boy, you challanged the king, do you not see this bling, i am the greatest, i run over you h**s, now bow down, and kiss my toes.
Rap Battle

Your name is Blade-of-truth, pshh, sounds the the username of some kid that works in a booth, you say my last battles were simple, man im bout to pop ur ego like a pimple. Im swaggy your faggy, like bieber in this sh*t, man just stop before you get hit. i dont wanna make you feel bad, just cuz ur lil fad failed, man just bail, i dont wnna hurt you, but uh, your jckets, they smell like poo, and just so you know, i f***ed your girl butt naked nasty, in the back of my cadi, when she went back to you, she couldnt stop thinking of how she had me(: Your up
Ryback should be fired.

1. My arguementsMy opponent doesn't touch any of these so extend all my points here. My conclusion from last round My opponent says that the what I brought up proves that Paul Hayman should be fired, but the fact that CM Punk is the one who is and was pulling the strings on Hayman show the fact that he should be fired. 2. His arguementsRyback has the phrase Feed Me More, but that doesn't mean anything. For example, the Undertaker uses the phrase rest in peace, but you don't see people going around giving people tombstones and doing Undertaker's signature cut throat taunt. Even Stone Cold Steve Austin . http://www.wwe.com... flips people off and cusses and drinks bear, but you don't see the youth of today drinking bear and fliping off teachers. . http://www.youtube.com... Ryback isn't fat he is actually overlly muscluar to the point to where he looks like a huge musclular Baustista. (see second video) . http://www.youtube.com...;So you can see that Ryback shouldn't be fired because of his theme of which he represents since there has been others in the past WWE history that have been worse like Stone Cold and the Undertaker.
Ryback should be fired.

Crazy Con (seriously, surprisingly)says: 1. SHIELD interferanceIf we look into many of these matches we can see that Ryback should have beaten Punk if it wasn't for the interfearance of the SHIELD. http://www.insidetheropes.co.uk... has interviened many times on the part of CM Punk. Each time screwing Ryback out of the WWE championship. The most notable is during a WWE title match on RAW between Ryback and CM Punk and Punk was down for the count outside the ring. Ryback was at the top of the ladder when the lights go off and the SHIELD attack him him and Punk wins the fight. (see video)www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlUo35avYck So that goes to show you that CM Punk is scared of Ryback.2. Brad Maddox interferanceDuring Hell in a Cell the match was basicly over when Ryback had CM Punk on his shoulders getting ready for the Shellshocker, but the reff., Brad Maddox, racked Ryback and CM Punk pinned him as a result. (see second video)www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm1sxixRS_U But to make things worse we learn that Brad Maddox was actually on Paul Hayman's payroll. For those of you who don't know Paul Hayman is CM Punk's manager. (see thrid video)www.youtube.com/watch?v=Teot5b1BIpo3. Punk Should be fired!As we have learned that the SHIELD and Brad Maddox were both hired by Paul Hayman and CM Punk to keep CM Punk champion, so it's obvious that he should be fired, but if you don't believe me lets look at the fourth video.www.youtube.com/watch?v=omdKiGhWHmM http://bleacherreport.com......So in conclusion Ryback shouldn't be fired but CM Punk should.Con's arguments attempt to prove that CM Punk should be fired, but in reality, those matches come to the conclusion that if anyone should be fired, it should be Paul Heyman. He's the one who paid the shield to interfere, and the one who bribed Brad Maddox to cheat radical ryback out of the Dynamic WWE Championship.My argument As we all know, people are getting more fat [1]. This means we do not need to encourage people to get more fat, and as we all know, when a WWE superstar gets the WWE championship, whatever slogans they have will inevitably become more popular. Ryback has been chasing the WWE Championship for quite a while [2], and he's inevitably going to get it sooner or later. Ryback's catchphrase 'Feed me more' will then be popularized and help obesity grow, which would be bad. Children and adults will spouting that phrase, 'feed me more'. It will encourage eating loads. It will create a world in which this scenario is common:[Fatty eats a billion burgers]Responsible/healthy adult: I think that's enought for you, you chocolate-chasing boulder of blubber.Fat slob: FEED ME MORE! [Chuckles, with fat vibrating viciously]Responsible/healthy adult: Oh alright, if you insist[Responsible/healthy adult shoves down a trillion more burgers down fatzo's piehole]So, this is why WWE stinkerstar Ryback should be fired. He needs to be fired before his devious plan is put into action, and more importantly, before he causes even more terrible tragedy and disgusting disaster.Sources[1] http://healthyamericans.org...;[2] http://www.wwe.com...
Ryback should be fired.

I accept and now I'll show you why Ryback is better and how Punk should actually be fired through my debate.1. SHIELD interferanceIf we look into many of these matches we can see that Ryback should have beaten Punk if it wasn't for the interfearance of the SHIELD. http://www.insidetheropes.co.uk... SHIELD has interviened many times on the part of CM Punk. Each time screwing Ryback out of the WWE championship. The most notable is during a WWE title match on RAW between Ryback and CM Punk and Punk was down for the count outside the ring. Ryback was at the top of the ladder when the lights go off and the SHIELD attack him him and Punk wins the fight. (see video) www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlUo35avYck So that goes to show you that CM Punk is scared of Ryback.2. Brad Maddox interferanceDuring Hell in a Cell the match was basicly over when Ryback had CM Punk on his shoulders getting ready for the Shellshocker, but the reff., Brad Maddox, racked Ryback and CM Punk pinned him as a result. (see second video) www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm1sxixRS_U But to make things worse we learn that Brad Maddox was actually on Paul Hayman's payroll. For those of you who don't know Paul Hayman is CM Punk's manager. (see thrid video) www.youtube.com/watch?v=Teot5b1BIpo3. Punk Should be fired!As we have learned that the SHIELD and Brad Maddox were both hired by Paul Hayman and CM Punk to keep CM Punk champion, so it's obvious that he should be fired, but if you don't believe me lets look at the fourth video. www.youtube.com/watch?v=omdKiGhWHmM http://bleacherreport.com...So in conclusion Ryback shouldn't be fired but CM Punk should.
Ryback should be fired.

When watching WWE, if you're one of those people who gets bored extremely easy, after watching about 100 hours of CM Punk whoop everyone's butt, you may start to feel a tiny bit bored. Next, you see Ryback, a boulder of muscle. You may think that CM Punk would finally lose, but then you'd be wrong [1] [2]. Ryback is absolutely rubbish.In round 1, the opponent will make (s)his case.Sources[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...(2012) [2] http://en.wikipedia.org...(2012)