Nonsensical argument debate

"I do not accept"Youre off to a good start ;DRESOLUTION: PEOPLE WHO ARE PRO CHOICE SHOULD BE SHOT INTO SPACELets begin.... My first argument that people who are pro choice should be shot into space is that it was decreed they should be by supreme leader George Optimus Prime Lincoln the fourth, back before food was invented. He made this decree to fight the population shortage that crippled the nation during our decade long war with the Cricket people of Titan-Pluto which was started over a territorial rights to Jack Nicholson's sperm. The cricket people wanted his sperm because it is the only substance known to ward off the crickets natural predators, dead people, but humanity needed it because it was the only know cure to testicular elephantitis, a disease that causes people to drag their balls across the faces of old statues of the Virgin Mary. If pro-choice people were shot into space then the war would not have been lost, the cricket people would have been killed off, and statues of the virgin mary would have not been vandalized with sweaty balls.The second argument for the resolution is that pro-choice people have been scientifically proven to not have souls. When pro-choicers are exposed to the color purple, it will cause them to recite the pledge of allegiance backwards while at the same time they will try dipping their balls into scalding hot coffee, which is the act of someone with no soul. This was first observed in the great coffee suicide of 2103, when in Boston Kentucky North Carolina a coffee manufactory had redesigned its interior purple, causing all 14 pro choice workers to jump into a holding tank of scalding coffee. All of them perished, including a pet mouse that was gnawing at the scrotum of one of the workers who hadnt noticed there was a rodent in his pants at the time. Pro-choicers worship rodents as gods by the way. Since its a fact that pro-choicers have no soul, it is morally acceptable to use them as ammunition and shoot them into space. The third argument for shooting pro-choicers into space is that it would bring an end to the eon-long conflict between them and the Spanish-Israeli regime that currently occupies Jennifer Lopez. Jenniefer Lopez was the pride of the Pro-choice confederacy, but then everything changed when the fire nation attacked. Only the avatar, master of all four elements could stop them, but when the pro-choicers needed him most, he vanished. The Spanish-Israeli's occupied Jennifer Lopez (both in territory and sexually) and were able to fend off the Pro-choice armada for decades, thanks largely to the invention of the sh*t cannon, a cannon that shoots tons and tons of sh*tty Justin Bieber music at the pro-choicers. So even though the Pro-choicers have the right to Jennifer Lopez, shooting all pro-choicers into space would be beneficial because it would end the pro-choice-Spanish-Israeli conflict by literally removing pro-choicers from the problem.... And shooting them into space. The final argument for shooting pro-choice people into space is because space is horrendously underpopulated. Now sure, a lot of people dont live in space because of Space's strict gun control laws, but Earth has enough problems already! Over population, water tainted with alien dildo's, Snooki getting pregnant for the 30th time (the father was a goat, I say was because it committed suicide after learning what it did), are all reasons why Earth should shoot its problems into space, starting of course with pro-choice people. Earth is overpopulated, pro-choice people dont have souls, and space is out there doing nothing, all of these are legit reasons for why pro-choice people should be shot into space.