God Probably Exists

Hello,I will, once again, put your headings above each of by differences. I will also have the Oxford definition of god below, which pretty much discredits all of your rebuttals."The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods"R1:(1): This in no way is a difference, it is just merely saying that we can not yet prove either right. You mention that you are not arguing that god created the universe, well then what does it matter he exists? if he did not give us life what did he give us?Another problem with this refute is we are using the Oxford Dictionary definitions, however you use the opposite of what you say here in your refute in R2,1 and the definition you provided at the start of the debate. Also how does the 'what created god?' fail in any sense, i wanted you to answer that question but you claim that it does not relate to your argument. It does not matter if it was not relevant to your argument anyway, as this is my argument.(2):This argument does not fail in any sense. There is proof, which i mentioned within my argument, to show that god was to please the masses and make the monarchy more powerful. I do realize this does not disprove god, it just makes him less probable, as he has been exploited and done nothing about it. One quote from your refute is “Belief in God” is not synonymous with “religion.” Well under your rules we are to use definitions from the Oxford dictionary, and as seen above it pretty much destroys your argument right there as religion is the belief in god. If you say you believe in god, like you have, then you are religious. You in no way at all have proven god exists in your argument, like you claim. You have merely shown the lack of comprehension that religious many people behold. I say neither can be proven at the moment and that is true, as neither have been proven.R2:(1):What a joke of a refute. I used the bible in many of my arguments as the people who believe in the bible are religious and believe in god. Many other religions have an equivalent of the bible that say similar things. The majority of the people who are religious believe in a book that is, or is similar to, the bible. As we are using the Oxford dictionary you told me that you believe in god, thus you are religious. Most of the religious people believe in a book similar or equal to the bible. I don't know, nor do i care what you believe in i am arguing against what the majority of people believe in. You can not pick and choose your beliefs to suit your argument. Did you expect me to argue against your beliefs even though you did not identify what they were. So my argument of how prayers don't work still exists. (2):Since the title of the debate is 'God Probably Exists' did it occur to you that i am proving that go is less probable as there is very little proven evidence to prove either side of the argument. Furthermore, it is the problem of your obscure beliefs once again. A lot of religious people (believers in god) use DNA as an argument for god, here is an example, "DNA is information. The amount of information encapsulated in a single strand of human DNA would fill 400 volumes the size of an Encyclopedia Britanica, and this information contains an exact blueprint for creating a human being. This information did not write itself. The creation of information requires intelligence. The creation of an encyclopedia requires an author - a creator. God is the creator of the information in DNA." Well you and i just agreed that that is incorrect and that is another proof that the common god is less probable.(3)Once again your uncommon belief that i was not made aware of comes up again. Well you said it yourself "not a God of any religion", well using the definitions that you wanted us to this is basically saying 'not a god of any beliefs in god' meaning that your god is one tat no one believes in. Well you believe in that god making this refute and your claim incorrect. (4)I don't know where your refute to part 4 is. I don't think you even wrote one. My conclusion:I am sorry if i come across as rude but your argument and refute is ridiculous. If you were to win this debate it would have to be from bias voters or my English mistakes.