Resolved: The United States should send military into N. Korea.

Thank you for your reply. I'm also enjoying this battle. Now i will discuss why your reasoning is flawed in attacking North Korea. I will go with the number theme like were been doing. 1.Morality- You say " countries wouldn't push back" if the US attacks North Korea. I will ask you where is your proof? Both Russia, China and even South Korea them self-say there shouldn't be any war at any time. And both China and Russia are preparing themselves if war does break out. I will give out more proof later on this. You said no one like North Korea. Doesn't mean China nor Russia won't defend the North. You are right the US was able to police the world for the last 70 years since WWII. But things have changed now, and there are other superpowers in play now aka China, and other military powers like Russia who is challenging the US policy every inch they can get now. National Security "Strategy document said Russia and China were trying to "challenge American power, influence and interests" and "erode American security and prosperity". " (12.) http://www.telegraph.co.uk... So the US doesn't have the means to police everything anymore. 2. Political. you say this "-Even if a lot of countries don't want the means, the ends still justify i".. How does the end Justify it? you also say this "We could give control of the North Korea to South Korea and not only would that make them happy with us again, but it would make sure it won't backfire". What does this even means? You mean we invaded the North and then return the North to the South? Really can you hear your self? China and Russia would never let that happen. You will be begging for a world war. Again This will backfires if the US attack the North. I will give you more reasons why China and Russia will help the North very soon. 3. Existential_ Again you just saying North Korea is making threats are not justification for a war. It has to be actions on the North part to cause a war. "China has also supported Assad and, while it has not deployed troops to the war-torn nation, it has blocked Western motions to unseat the Syrian leader, invested in reconstruction efforts and pursued greater military ties with Russia in general". (13.) http://www.newsweek.com... The reason why I bring up the Syria President Bashar al-Assad because he is arguably the worst leader that Kim Jong-Un. Bashar al-Assad Actually gas his own citizens and has a civil war that been going on for 7 years. And guess who back him Russia with military aid and China with funds and to blocked any attempt of the US to stop this war. The same thing will happen in North Korea but with a far greater price. And instead of Russia backing North Korea military, it will be China and Russia backing the North with equipment, supplies and money. You don't think both Russia and China will not get involved is being pretty naive. 4. China. You say China won't go to war. Just because of a democratic country on its border. That is a wrong statement because they did just that in the first Korea war, and stop the US and the South from gaining full control over there. They already say they would defend them again if another war pops off. but only if the US started it. China is a rising power and they won't allow the Korean to have a fully democratic country on its border. You said China is just making threats as a "bargaining chip and nothing more". How can you prove this? What happens if you and the US are wrong on this? I can tell you if you and the US are wrong then a world war would happen. So, Are you really going to risk a world war over this? How can you be 100% sure China will just sit back and not help? Again you nor the US can't be 100% sure. So why risk so many lives? When the North is just trying to protect them self, just like the US with their nukes, just like all the other with nuclear-armed country they have it for defensive purposes only." PLA is also a warning to Washington and Seoul not to provoke Pyongyang any further," Li Jie, a military expert based in Beijing, told the Post, using the abbreviation for the Chinese People's Liberation Army". "In addition to flexing its military muscle against the US, China has been increasingly assertive in the South China Sea". (14.) http://www.businessinsider.com... Again this doesn't sound like China would just sit around and let North Korea get hammer by the US. 5. You said " it would be worth it for the sake of human rights. I would rather die in a fair would than live in an unjust one". You might want to die for that. But you are being misled into thinking North Korea would attack first or because they violating Humans right. News flash China, part of the Middle East, Africa, and parts South American has the same problem with human rights violations. But you just singling North Korea when in fact there are other worst countries that doing the same or worst. I would love for you to tell South Korea, Japan, or our military personnel that is station there that they would die and the US don't care as long as they get rid of North Korea. When in fact North Korea hasn't even attacked any other countries. They just making threats just like the US are making threats to them and they are testing ICBM's like Russia and China. You still ignore the fact that China and Russia are actually the bigger threats to US National Security and our policy around the world. You much rather have War, without giving peace a chance that sound reasonable to you? I think most of the world would want to give peace a chance instead of just going to war, without any real justification. You want to go to war because of humans rights then we should go to war with the other half of the world in your logic. This is crazy talk. you much rather kill off hundreds of millions just for misconceptions and for a human right issue. The 60's 70's and 80's was the worst period of humans rights then right now. And you want to just rush into a war that has the potential to kill off millions that don't sound reasonable at all.