Counter Point to the Kindergarten Cookie Ration argument

1: I will concede the first point, it was badly written and badly articulated to the point that I can't actually understand why I wrote it. 2: I completely agree that not all children work like hell for the candy and some will work anyways, but it gives the incentive, and the incentive is what makes communism fall, in theory, and in practice, And that is the flaw in communism. Saying it's anything else is denying basic psychology. (and can you elaborate on how you think that isn't the flaw of communism?) 3: I think you have confused marxism with communism, which is a big fundamental problem with your argument, the difference between Marxism and communism is that Communism is the state and Marxism is the community. For example, a Marxist society could function without a state and probably won't have one. But a communist society IS the state, it isn't a family, it's a relationship where there is a severe imbalance of power. 4: The problem with communism is it took the community in Marxism and replaced it with the state, so you, as you said would put aside personal gain for the group to succeed. But that ignores why groups were formed in the first place! This is what so many people just can't get through their heads "The group was formed by individuals So that the INDIVIDUAL could thrive and prosper" People just can not understand that the group was made to serve the individual, it is made up by individuals and will have flaws, and evil people. That is why we have laws, to govern the group, to make it not tear each other apart, so we can all have a unified purpose without us being tools for that purpose but a purpose is a tool for us. The thing about that is communism needs an uneducated populace, the poor, the rich, the middle class, but I don't get how communism would need people educated on values, you're seizing all resources from the people for the collective community. 5: If only one child receives a cookie then you try to help everyone get a cookie instead of taking away the cookie they earned unless you're trying to compare a child getting a cookie to a child earning it. I agree that a child who was raised well will give the others a cookie but there is a difference between the child getting it from their parents, earning the cookie, and the parents forcing the kid to give it evenly to all of the other children. 6: " A properly raised child who valued his entire family, who understood how the system works only if everyone supports it, that child would share his cookie with everyone else. That's true communism" There is a disparity you have to make with saying sharing and referring to communism in the same message or sub-message, communism is when the government takes your resources and gives them to various others evenly, as a nation. Marxism (What you're describing) Is communism but instead of the state it's on the community level, it's where all income you earn isn't yours but the communities, which is a kind of anarchy that could never last. That's also a flaw with the utopia marxism brings, it would not last just like anarchy or militia thought. (Only the counties authority matters) It assumes that everything will be fine and dandy if we leave everything in the community level then a group could band up and be worse than any capitalist system could be, it would be the death of everything anyone you know or love. 7: It is difficult to teach partisan bias in a way most of the nation is opposed to (at least in the same way) Which I don't see is what the flaw of communism, because that's just a lack of parenting rather than a lack of teaching good communist morales.