The Death Penalty should NOT be abolished but instead used more frequently

Rebuttals:>They need to be punished< I agree, punishment through LWOP.>recdivism<LWOP = Life without parole. They are in jail forever and no chance of parole. "Life Imprisonment (also known as a life sentence, lifelong incarceration or life incarceration) is any sentence of imprisonment for a serious crime under which the convicted person is to remain in jail for the rest of his or her life. " [1]***Case:C1: Innocents My opponents argument reads use it more often, that means more executions. This also means more innocents being executed. Everyone agrees that innocents being punished is not a good thing, it isn't justice. So everyone agrees that we should do as much as possible from punishing these innocents into a way that is not reversible. Every time we send a man to execution, we know he is either innocent are guilty, once the needle hits the skin its over, even if we pardon him later it does not matter, cant revive the dead. With LWOP however, if we find him innocent he gets let free, its reversible if he is found innocent. So the problem with the DP is once it is used, it is permanent. If it is used on an innocent, its over. With LWOP innocents can be pardoned. Now, how do we know we sometimes people that are innocent end up on death row? Sometimes they get released, and often. This means the likelyhood all of them get let out is unlikely, and this means the DNA and such are NOT accurate, this means it is likely they will be executed wrongly. Now, how do they get executed wrongly? A large thing that sways the jury is the eye witness. Many trials rely on these testimonies, but these testimonies are sometimes mixed, forgotten partially, or they are scared so their perception changes. These factors make the DP inaccurate.The Justice system we have, although attempts to be fair, has many problems like any institution. But as each institution has its faults, any fault you have with the DP ends an innocent human life, but with LWOP it can be reversed. A serious downside with the DP.C2: The DP is used unfairly Many factors come into play with the DP on how it is used, who it is used for, etc. But these biases make the system unfair, inaccurate, and problematic. One factor the DP is administered in is, not surprisingly, race. The racist usages of the DP are not changing over time, and are not confined to any specific regions, so it is happening everywhere. Capital punishment has always been effected by race. Very accurate studies show that if you are black, your chances of being convicted [to death] are 3.9 times higher then a white persons chance. [2] "The results are dramatic, particularly for a state outside of the deep south, a region where racial disparities in the criminal justice system have a long history. The researchers examined a large sample of the murders which were eligible for the death penalty in the state between 1983 and 1993. The researchers found that, even after controlling for case differences, blacks in Philadelphia were substantially more likely to get the death penalty than other defendants who committed similar murders. Black defendants faced odds of receiving a death sentence that were 3.9 times higher than other similarly situated defendants." [2]C3: CostIts common knowlege the DP costs more. CONCLUSION:DP is unfair, racist, kills innocents, and should be abolished. ______________________[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org...