The word "racism" has become a misused label in the United States.

Definition of racism (Miriam Webster Definition) 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race 2 a : a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles b : a political or social system founded on racism 3 : racial prejudice or discrimination Also about stereotype(Miriam Webster Definition, the example sentence is,"It is not fair to stereotype a whole group of people based on one person you don't like. " First, I would like to establish how I think in general and speak to what my arguments truly are. I am a "mathematician"(not literal) in which I create logic and reason with facts as the variables and morality as the constant. So my arguments are not so much as backing up facts but to rewrite how we think about things. For my example with Saudi Arabia(Which I have conceded that it was a false example, but the logic is still sound), my argument is about how we are actually literally sending them back to their own country because they were born there. You have argued the reason why that happens is because of terrorism. I disagree philosophically and theologically that terrorism is an appropriate reason to send someone back to the country that has extreme prejudice over our accepted general country's philosophically and theologically point of view. Whatever you define as our country's philosophy and theology doesn't matter to this logic because I am assuming that you know that many of those people in the middle east "pretty much hate our guts"(for whatever reason). My ultimate question before I give you the ratio of terrorist Muslims to all Muslims in the US is this: What ratio of bad people(example terrorists, corporatists 'I don't believe in owning everything for moral reasons') in a particular race(You have conceded that Muslims is a race) to good people is appropriately able to accept to stereotype that particular race? I would like to postulate that an average Muslim in America, that follows the law in America, is different from a Muslim in any of the countries on "The Muslim Ban" list. Now I will concede that this is an argument against stereotyping and not about racism. Ironically enough, I'm actually doing another argument with what seems to me as a White nationalist that is arguing for racism in which I do think you are wise enough to concede that it is racism. First, I would postulate that many of those Muslims in the middle east are indeed themselves racist to Americans. They do burn American flags and often say,"Death to America", which would indicate they believe they are superior to us. I would also postulate that the reason for their racism is a product of stereotypical arguments one such example being; Americans are arrogant(again for whatever reason). We(me and you), in my opinion, are not arrogant (also, in my opinion, I do believe that many Americans, far more than there are terrorists, are indeed arrogant at least to some degree). We discuss people objectively in this manner to discover truths. This is his argument for white superiority: "To answer your question, yes, a white person should absolutely be proud of the melanin in their superior system, by virtue of the fact that white folks simply have the best culture, the best organizational doctrine, and, well, the best everything. We are all equal in Heaven, but here on Earth, we are quite unequal. " Because of the lack of characters I'm able to use this current argument, I will paraphrase his argument, but honestly, you should take a look at the logic white people CAN have. . http://www.debate.org... Because it sounds very logical, I would postulate that this "propaganda" (in my opinion) has been spread throughout many in the white culture. Not to try to have you write my argument of how he is wrong, but I'm wondering if you know how he is wrong. I only ask because if you can't argue this, then wouldn't that establish that you have the same bias as him? If you do, then wouldn't that indicate that you're in denial of your own racism? (I assure you this is completely logical thinking that does not have to be correct if you can prove why these questions are invalid with reason and logic) The only thing I ask is that you don't respond by saying that he doesn't mean it. The fact of the matter is if I don't prove him wrong, then why would he not be superior because he is white? By the way, my argument for him is much different from my argument for you. The basic sum of what he is saying is that his race is superior because of the domination that Indo-Europeans had over history. However, to digress, my argument is to prove conceptually that that type of rationale can create many unfounded stereotypical arguments towards DIFFERENT races based on the observations that I see with Muslims in other countries that have a similar rationale towards us. Now what he is blind to, in which this is my argument to him, is going to be about is "why? " white people were so defined in history as a "superior" race. I use "superior" figuratively because it has absolutely nothing to with the amount of melanin in your system, which I will prove with his argument. I believe that most people act upon false assumptions, but only the wise will see past those unknown lies. To say my conceptual argument is wrong is to first prove that Muslims don't act stereotypically as well as we do, in addition, to prove wrong that racism is a product of stereotypical arguments. I am arguing that Muslims can be racists too, along with any other race. I have purposely used Muslims in my example because if you think that they are right in how they view us, then you are not a hypocrite for saying that we should keep using stereotypical arguments for any race including black people. Personally, I would like to show any race that I am not their political enemy and more importantly that I'd prefer to be their friend instead. (I do follow the Christ, so I still technically judge that their beliefs are wrong, but we live in America where different beliefs are accepted to coexist with each other, which is the reason why I don't want to send them back to people who essentially may view them as tainted by the Devil) I also believe that simply because some people are hypocrites, that does not mean that I have to be one. I am trying to better than you not by saying that I'm white, but instead trying to be better through intellectual arguments and what my heart or the very core of who I am says to be true. In my opinion, that does not make me a hypocrite for seeking power. I would like to thank my opponent for this debate and I hope to further my development of reason and logic through conceptions rather than facts. Facts, to me, are just variables in an equation(which can be changed such as the mistake I made with Saudi Arabia). Debating conceptions builds onto the equation. I realize I haven't produced for my previous argument, but I opted to go a different route to prove my argument conceptually. If you do prove my argument conceptually incorrect, then I will probably go through the "fact" route. "The fact that most terrorists derive from the Islamic religion means some action needs to be taken to atlas close some gates to possible terrorist openings. " "Some action needs" does not mean that a "Muslim Ban" had to happen. "Some actions" can be improved background checks OR improved airport screening OR something else that doesn't involve potentially sending an innocent American to their deaths. "The Muslim Ban", in my opinion, is too great of an unnecessary measure that only makes America seem too good to have Muslims which is superiority. I will try to completely solidify that opinion in my next argument.