Any attempt at arguing for an infinitely-intelligent, creator god is illogical

Counter counter-argumentsI've left out the arguments that Con conceded, seeing as there is no point further arguing them.:::::::::::::To say that the universe is "finely tuned" is to say that the creator god is not omnipotent::::::::::" The fact that he can "play the universe out of tune" suggests that he can create a flawed universe"“He could if he wanted but why would he?”Tuning cannot, by definition, take place outside of an obstacle-goal relationship. Sure, this god could supposedly create a universe which doesn’t function correctly, but then this would be his goal; hence you can’t say that he has played the universe ‘out of tune’. To say that he could play the universe out of tune, is to say that this god doesn’t have control over some aspects of our reality. “You say that the fact that he could make a flawed universe is proof that he does not exist. If a gardener creates an irrigation system and sets up a harvesting system to automatically take care of his plants. Does it make him less of a gardener because he could have NOT set up the system? He did and that is all that matters.”The gardener analogy falls short because the gardener isn’t both omnipotent and infinitely-intelligent. Again, if god could play the universe ‘out of tune’, then that god wouldn’t be omnipotent as the universe has been created in a way that the god did not want. To say that he did and that’s all that matters, is to not address the clear issues that come with such a scenario. ::::::::::::::Something cannot be conscious without demonstrating intelligence:::::::::::::::“…He is an omniscient and omnipotent God. I don't think he spends his time (unlimited as it is) trying to impress humans. We are beneath him and need to prove our worthiness not him.”This is beside the point. If he can’t demonstrate consciousness via intelligence, then how can you make a rational argue for the existence of such a god? You can’t logically justify the existence of an infinitely-intelligent god when that god’s presence can’t be established in some way. :::::::::::::::It is not possible to demonstrate infinite intelligence and infinite power at the same time::::::::::::::::"you cannot play a game of chess in order to show how smart you are, without first limiting yourself to the rules."“Thank you for proving my above point. This is why he does not play human games of 'Proof' They are beneath him.”It is not about 'playing human games,' am I not arguing logically?-; it’s about demonstrating infinite-intelligence and omnipotence at the same time. My point is that you cannot demonstrate intelligence without limiting yourself to a situation that would demonstrate intelligence. It’s, unfortunately, the only way to prove your intelligence: limiting yourself to a set of rules. You can’t stare at a rock and decide whether it is intelligent or not. You can, however, argue a chess-player’s intelligence based on the moves he/she makes."Demonstrations of consciousness require demonstrations of intelligence"“He has demonstrated this for everyone by the creation of Existence.”He can’t by what I’ve argued; that’s the whole point of this debate! By the creation of "Existence", he would proving that he were limited by subjecting himself to the task, yet he’s also supposed to be unlimited (omnipotent)."Demonstrations of intelligence require the presence of limitations"“Existence is limitless. There is no end to his creation therefore no limits.”What? We’re talking about the nature of his intelligence, not the length of his creation. "Intelligence (limited) and Omnipotence (unlimited) are mutually exclusive"“But Omniscient (god-like intelligence) and Omnipotence are not.”“God-like intelligence” still involves intelligence, and to have a god demonstrate his infinite-intelligence and omnipotence via the creation of everything, is contradictory as he would be demonstrating limitation and absence of limitation at the same time.