Noone can beat Chuck Norris.

http://www.youtube.com... take a close look at rules 2 and 3. 3 contradicts 2. If one must prove there person exist then by default fictional characters are not just 'discouraged' but outright impossible. I have Fictional contenders though that I would be happy to present Chuck Norris based on shear awesomeness but until I can have confirmed that its safe to use them they can not be my contenders. My first contender is Jackie Chan http://www.youtube.com... Since we can neither use fictional characters I demand that my opponent cannot not use the fictional chuck Norris. For The real one is this Old Man that you see in this video. Just listen to him talk and his oldness should be apparent. He's still in shape for sure thanks to all that gym equipment he is frequently advertising on TV, so he will likely live to a very old age, I would put money on him and his wife living past 110 years old before passing away. But examine closely he's just a man, if wolverine cuts of one of is testis it will not create Jupiter it will just be a sad bloody mess on the the floor and he may have difficulty 'having some fun' with his wife. Now if fictional characters apply that do not need be proved real then all the 'Chuck Norris Facts' like him having a fist under his beard and his tears curing cancer can apply to him. But we all know in reality Mr Norris has a regular chin under that beard and my opponent would not dare try and prove that the fist chin exist under there. So with only proved existing people applying to this debate only the very real Chuck Norris can be used in this debate. Listen to him talk again, he's an Old Man. Listen to what he spends his time doing, Old People Stuff! like reading congressional bills that are thousands of pages long just so he can voice an opinion with authority on a talk show with little viewers. I ask you if god needs to ask this man to create the universe shouldn't he have enough authority to tell the people the bill is a stupid one without needing the read it. it is an abrasive to Chuck Norris 'facts' (humorous ones) to claim that he needs to 'read' a bill to call it good or bad. If Chuck Norris facts represented the real Norris then he would have roundhouse kicked all of congress in the face until they give make a better bill, when is that bill okay with chuck Norris, when it has the roundhouse kick expensive insurance companies clause. Chuck Norris does not read bills and support them on talk shows he roundhouse kicks the president until taxes drop, and the businessmen until premiums go up. But know the video indicates he went through the lame process of reading a boring bill. Now let us examine the real Jackie Chan, He is an old man too but just look at what he is still doing in the second video. That movie was this year, and he still does his own stunts. And he's not done with his action career yet with the upcoming Karate Kid movie. Also any given action seen in Chan's past movies or shows is clearly more awesome than the ones done by the Texas Ranger. Jackie Chan can turn a ladder that's stuck on him into a weapon, he can turn a fish into a weapon, and my favorite a horseshoe on a rope. Every thing is a weapon in Jackie Chan's hands. If my opponent demands the Chuck Norris 'facts' still apply then I say its fact that Jackie Chan can use a tub of cool whip to break you bones. my opponent may say this fight can have no weapons only bare fist, but given just that Chan would use Norris own shirt and pants against him. He would even use the seventy year old Chuck own round house kick against him. Grab his leg stopping the roundhouse kick and flip him upside down or make him run backwards into a wall or down the stairs, depending on the environment. Another advantage of the Chan man is that wherever the fight is it easily becomes his playground, not counting the stuff he finds and pulls a Mcgiver with. He can fight you on top of a wind sail on a boat, on rafters of a building in construction, in a bell tower, on a train, ect.... just name the location and Chan is more known for exploiting it on the spot. Jackie Chan is so awesome he has even had his own cartoon, what cartoon has Chuck Norris ever been? So as we can see the non-fictional proved real Chuck is now old and not so awesome the non fictional proved real Jackie Chan is also old now and he is still awesome. The case is clear.