God does not exist

It appears that my opponent assumes that making random statements with no support substantiates as proof. For example, you will notice that my opponent said the following:"When faced with the two options of a hypothetical non-sentient cause and a sentient cause of the universe,a non-sentient cause is most likely true because it is more probable, and involves more power and complexity".Here he makes a statement, but where's the proof? He provides absolutely none. You must first prove that a non-sentient cause is more powerful to even base a conclusion on such standards. Yet my opponent provides absolutely none, thus providing a baseless statement. But let us say, for the sake of argument, that such a statement is true. Then based on such logic, my opponent is saying that the proof that God does not exist is because non-sentinent causes are more powerful. Therefore, the universe could not come from God because God is not as powerful as a non-sentient cause. Yet my oponent again provides no evidence to support the statement. Furthermore, it implies that he would know how powerful God is to make a statement. But wait. I thought that God does not exist? Then how can you possibly know how powerful God is? His argument falls apart from all angles. He then says:P2: "It is nonsensical to believe a cause can exist outside the universe....."Okay. That's a start. So what proof do you have to support it. So he says"because they occur within the universe"That's it? That's the proof? All my opponent has done thus far is say statements with no proof at all. Simply saying so is not proof that it is so. There is absolutely no logic or rational provided. Surely, even if one agrees that there is no God, they can at least see that such logic does not hold as proof that there is no God.Yet the inability of my opponent to provide sound logi does not automaticaly prove the existence of God. The proof of God's exisetence is in the following:Intelligent creation cannot originate from unintelligenceWhat is the definition of unintelligence. Unintelligence is defined as the inability to learn and comprehend. In other words, no intelligence. Thus by definition, unintelligence cannot have originated intelligence because by definition, it is unintelligent. One cannot provide for something that it does not have itself. This is simple common sense. So the intelligence of any creation cannot possibly come from unintelligence because one with no intelligence has none to give. One cannot provide something that it does not posses themself. Can I provide you money when I do not have any? The obvious answer is no. This simple logic is enough to disprove any claim that the human species, which is intelligent, originated from unintelligence. No. We could only have come from intelligence, thus proving that we originated from intelligent design and the name of the intelligent designer is identified as God. A pattern that repeats itself can only originate from intelligence.Let us further prove the existence of God by proving that unintelligence cannot originate a repeated pattern. To do so, we first have to analyze something that is uninteligent. Let's take the body of a dead person. Now if I ask the dead person to draw me a checkerboard pattern, what will be the result? Nothing. Why? The dead person cannot learn or comprehend what it is being told. In other words, it is unintelligent. As a result of its unintelligence, it cannot create intelligence or use it to create a pattern. Let us look at a new born baby. A baby is an intelligent species. Yet if I ask a new born to draw a repeating pattern with a paint brush, what will be the result. The answer is obvious. Nothing. Here, an intelligent being cannot create a simple drawing. Why? Because as we know, the child lacks the ability to comprehend what they are being told as a new born, thus lacking intelligence and from their lack of intelligence, cannot create a repeating pattern. Thus we see from two tested subjects of unintelligence and even slight intelligence that a pattern that repeats itself cannot be created, thus proving that it can only originate from intelligent design. Therefore, the solar system, water cycle, and other natural phenomenoms within the universe that repeat had to originate from intelligent design, further proving that God is the originator of the universe.Thus we see that when tested, as provided above, unintelligence fails to create something with intelligence or repeated patterns, thus proving that the universe and life itself originated from God, who is the intelligent designer.Creation by Chance causes disorderA pattern that repeats itself as well as organization can only originate from one making a decision. This is also easily proven. Again, we need a test subject. Let's use ourselves. If one wants to draw a human face in a picture, one would first have to decide on which stroke of the brush to use, decide where each feature of the face goes, it's size, dimensions, ,etc. Without doing so, it would not be possible to to draw the face. A decision is made first and the drawing is based on the decision and ideas. Now if one does not use their intelligence and make a decision or choice, then that means that a person is acting by chance. So what is the result of drawing a painting using no decision, judgment, or comprehension? Complete disorder. If I throw a bucket of paint on the wall, making no choice as to where the paint aligns on the paper, what are the chances that it will draw a face? Exactly. None. Not only will there be no face, but it will be complete disorder from even looking like a face. In other words, without using intelligence disorder was created. Thus we see that unintelligence creates disorder, thus proving that the order of the stars,planets, and all that exist in the universe did not happen by chance or unintelligence, but intelligent design. Thus proving finally that God is the originator of all creation in the universe.