Evil proves God does not exist

I congratulate my opponent on his response. I will now go over the claims from the debate: On definitions - you state God is "all-powerful" but reject "omnipotence"? You have stated he is all powerful, thus he is omnipotent. I reference heaven in that we both recognized God created a paradise to live in after this life. My opponent states heaven is attainable for those who do not deserve, so does that mean people unworthy of heaven don't go to hell, they go to heaven? I agree with the definition that free will is the capacity of man to choose good or evil. My opponent has referenced my questions, and my intent of my questioning was to draw further elaboration from my opponent. I will now directly address how my contentions point to the conclusion that the presence of evil proves God's non-existence: 1) God has created a universe that causes suffering independent of our free will. We do not will earthquakes to occur. Thus, they are results of God's creation. If God created a universe that causes death independent of our choice to inflict death, this means God is choosing death. Therefore, this either means God has chosen evil (which proves the God he have defined does not exist, i.e., God must be all good, not good and evil) or this universe was not created by any God. 2) The "best" possible universe would be one where all people have all the food they'll ever need, all the water they ever need, all the shelter they ever need, yet we live in a universe of scarce resources. We have defined God as "all-powerful" yet either it is out of his power to provide all we need (thus, the "all-powerful" God we defined does not exist) or he purposely chooses not to give us all we need because he is not "caring" or "good". This is because if he is "all-powerful" he is purposely choosing not to give mankind the "best" possible universe. Now for my last argument, I will combine my original last contentions since they essentially deal with the same issue. 3) The "perfect" universe God denies however actually does exist. It is called "heaven". Yet we are forced to suffer in a life before we can go to heaven. Why? Well, if it certainly is within God's "all-power" to grant us the paradise from birth, then why doesn't he? Either because he is not the "good" God we have defined, or that God does not exist, period. If a child is murdered shortly after birth, without exercising any free will (choosing good or evil), then he must go to heaven. But what about the murderer? He gave that child paradise, which is good, but he will be condemned by God's command to not commit murder. What I'm trying to say is either God should just hand us all paradise right away since it would be the most "caring" thing he could do, or he is not caring and only gives heaven to those "who deserve it" as deemed by himself. In conclusion, man may choose good or evil. But the presence of evil is apparent outside of our own choices. Therefore, either God does not exist because he is not consistent with our definition of him, or God does not exist, period. My opponent wants direct arguments, so I will review them as following: C1: A -> God is good. B -> God has created a universe that destroys people's lives and causes pain for no reason. C -> Pain and death without reason is evil. Therefore, God is evil because he has caused "C" through "B". "A" cannot be true. If "A" is not true, God does not exist. C2: A -> God is all-powerful. B -> Not all people have all the food, water, or shelter they need. C -> It is within God's power to provide these to all people due to "A". Therefore, God should provide these because he can. He doesn't. Therefore, "A" is not true. If "A" is not true, God does not exist. ALSO, if God should provide all people with these goods then he is creating the most good, for the most people. He does not. Therefore, once again, C1 is true and God does not exist. C3+C4: A -> Heaven is paradise. B -> God would be providing everyone perfect happiness by giving us heaven before life. C -> God does not give us heaven before life. Therefore, "B" shows us that God does not provide maximum happiness to all people because of "C". If he does not, it is not the "good" choice, and therefore God is not absolutely good. If he is not, as I showed in C1 he does not exist. I hope this straightens up my claims. "Evil" is "morally objectionable behavior". God does not exhibit the highest moral actions, and because he does not, his actions are morally objectionable. Thus, due to "evil", God cannot exist because God IS the highest moral entity.