Society will eventually devolve into a totalitarian regime

It is clear Pro still believes a totalitarian regime could change the Laws of Nature, more specifically, life's Unalienable Rights (the physical Constructal Law). The simple fact is, no human mastermind, who lust for power over others, can change the Laws of Nature. Con will address Pro's three points: Pro stated, “1. Adolph's failure wasn't due to his removal of unalienable rights in the German people, it was due to his challenging other nations with conflicting ideals. ”Adolph removed the Unalienable Rights of about 6,000,000 Germans, by taking their Right to "Life" away in the ovens of Adolph's concentration camps. Rumor has it, Adolph had a thing for those Germans with Jewish ancestry. Again, an idiot mastermind who went against the Laws of Nature in a mode of self-destruction. The US, a freer nation at the time, felt bad for the Germans who were conned by such an idiot, and after the war, rebuilt Germany. Today, the Germans are enjoying their Unalienable Rights and the most prosperous country in Europe. Pro stated, “2. The fact that the rise of a perminent totalitarian regime may cause an extinction isn't pertinent to this debate. Extinction is inevitible of all species. ”Relative to this debate, the term “devolve” is in the title. Therefore, “devolve” and its counterpart evolution, both depend on extinction in transformation from one form to another. Devolve: "to gradually go from an advanced state to a less advanced state" (. http://www.merriam-webster.com...). Life's Unalienable Rights is part of evolution, to evolve to a more advance state not to “devolve. ” By the mere title of this debate, implies “a totalitarian regime” goes against evolution, against the Laws of Nature. The fact that “a totalitarian regime” goes against evolution, its life span will be relatively short. Pro stated, “3. Totalitarian regimes make use of the organizational abilities of the masses and breaks them from their individuality, allowing them to have certain freedoms but training them into thinking with a set of government supported ideals. ”“Organizational abilities . .. government supported ideals” are simply the con of a mastermind, or an oligarch, who are also fallible humans. Again, the propaganda from the ignorance and greed of an oligarch embracing totalitarianism cannot change the Laws of Nature, for their regimes are self-destructive---“devolving. ” Devolving by the glut of enjoyable perks for the tyrannical oligarch, while they put their serfs into bondage violating their Unalienable Rights, retarding social evolution. With the evolution of the internet, the propaganda from tyrannical oligarchs will fade in time. In a free-market civil society, who includes the study of morality as a subject in science, will become a society guided by the “invisible hand” (see Con's presentation in Round 2), while the role of government evolves to a level with the sole purpose to embrace and protect the individual's Unalienable Rights from the crimes of others and from the crimes of government, no more, no less. The nineteenth century German poet Holderlin once said, “What has always made the state a hell on earth, has been precisely that man has tried to make it his heaven. ”Relative to the individual's Unalienable Rights, the proper response to Holderlin is: What has always made the state a joy on earth, has been precisely that man has Liberty in the moral pursuit of his own heaven. With that said, and in closing, I wish Pro a long and healthy “Life,” having ample freedom (“Liberty”), in the moral “pursuit of ” Pro's heaven, aka “Happiness. ”