jesus never stated one single, not one word about being gay nor transgender.

You are wrong in the sense that I do not believe in anything in regards to the Old Testament. As I have mentioned multiple times, the events described in the Old Testament did transpire. The law of the Old Testament is what we are no longer bound by. The flood and Noah's ark are not part of the law, I'm not sure how you mixed those up. One is a historic event, and the other refers to rules that God's chosen people had to follow. They are two different things. I also do not have the time to watch 40 minutes of debating, so if there is information in either of those videos that you want me to know, you will have to put it in your next response. You are still insistent that God wants us to hate homosexuals, yet who have failed to provide a single verse in the Bible that says so. You asked "who approved that so-called 'law'? And what 'law'?". I was referring to the abolishment of the old law through Jesus. You then stated "your [J]esus' superior, namely [G]od". Jesus is God; the Godhead is made up of God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit, which is called the trinity [23]. Jesus doesn't need permission to do anything, because He is God [3-11, 13-18, 21-23]. John 10:30 states "I and the Father are one" [9]. 2 Peter 1:1 states "by the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ". Hebrews 1:2 states "in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world". You claim that Jesus is not God but provide no hard evidence to back that up. You then say that Jesus is "a false messiah because he broke many of [G]od's laws including working on the [S]abbath", and that He should have been put to death. This is incorrect. If Jesus did violate the Sabbath, then He sinned. This is false because we know that He lived a perfect, sinless life [12, 19-20]. 1 Peter 2:21-22 states "Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example for you to follow in His steps, who committed no sin, nor was any deceit found in His mouth" [20]. There are multiple accounts of Jesus being accused of breaking the Sabbath, so I will go through all of them. Luke 6:1-2 states "Now it happened that He was passing through some [grain fields] on a Sabbath; and His disciples were picking the heads of grain, rubbing them in their hands, and eating the grain. But some of the Pharisees said, 'Why do you do what is not lawful on the Sabbath?'". First of all, Jesus did not pick any of the grain. Second, in Luke 6:5 Jesus states "The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath". Jesus can do anything He pleases regarding the Sabbath. It was not unlawful for the priests to work for the Lord in the temple. Matthew 12:5 states "'Or have you not read in the Law, that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath and are innocent?'". The priests were excused because they were working in God's temple. Jesus says in the next verse "'But I say to you that something greater than the temple is here'". His disciples were excused because they were there with Jesus, who is much more important than the temple. "On another Sabbath He entered the synagogue and was teaching; and there was a man there whose right hand was withered. The scribes and the Pharisees were watching Him closely to see if He healed on the Sabbath, so that they might find reason to accuse Him. But He knew what they were thinking, and He said to the man with the withered hand, 'Get up and come forward!' And he got up and came forward. And Jesus said to them, 'I ask you, is it lawful to do good or to do harm on the Sabbath, to save a life or to destroy it?' After looking around at them all, He said to him, 'Stretch out your hand!' And he did so; and his hand was restored". Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath. Not only this, but he was not committing a selfish act; he healed a man's hand. Doing good on the Sabbath was not unlawful, only things done for yourself. Take the man who was picking up sticks for example: he was doing his personal chores on the day that God commanded them to rest as He did so on the seventh day of creation. The Sabbath was meant as a blessing, not a curse to capture those who do good. Luke 13:10-17 states "And He was teaching in one of the synagogues on the Sabbath. And there was a woman who for eighteen years had had a sickness caused by a spirit; and she was bent double, and could not straighten up at all. When Jesus saw her, He called her over and said to her, 'Woman, you are freed from your sickness.' And He laid His hands on her; and immediately she was made erect again and began glorifying God. But the synagogue official, indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, began saying to the crowd in response, 'There are six days in which work should be done; so come during them and get healed, and not on the Sabbath day.' But the Lord answered him and said, 'You hypocrites, does not each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or his donkey from the stall and lead him away to water him? And this woman, a daughter of Abraham as she is, whom Satan has bound for eighteen long years, should she not have been released from this bond on the Sabbath day?' As He said this, all His opponents were being humiliated; and the entire crowd was rejoicing over all the glorious things being done by Him". Luke 14:1-6 states "And Jesus answered and spoke to the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, 'Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath, or not?' But they kept silent. And He took hold of him and healed him, and sent him away. And He said to them, 'Which one of you will have a son or an ox fall into a well, and will not immediately pull him out on a Sabbath day?' And they could make no reply to this". The other story(ies) is like this as well. You said "OK well then according to you then that means that ANYBODY through the ages has taken potshots at your [B]ible through the thousands of years that it has been on display and thus obviously and rather blatantly you have no idea as how to interpret your [B]ible because of this. And it also proves that your [G]od would ---never--- use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible". Please elaborate on what you mean by people taking "potshots" at the Bible. You say that the Bible has been on display, as if it is some sort of painting in an art museum. The Bible is read and studied by so many people; how would they not know how to interpret it? The original Hebrew and Greek writings have different translations, like any language being converted into another. You then say that text is the worst form of communication. What other form of communication do you think should have been used? I see no downsides to text as a form of communication. You then said "Oh I get it, so if you as a [C]hristian were to see a gay person kissing another man and then see someone raping a 6 year old child, you'd call the police on the gay couple". What in the world are you talking about? Homosexuality is not a crime, why would I call the police? Next, you said "Don't you [C]hristians have better things to do with your time like helping others like the 6 year olds being raped?". Do you think I should purchase a gun and go scour the streets searching for rapists? You said, "That's because [G]od is based entirely on hate which is so ridiculously easy to prove as [G]od hates children". You also said that I could not prove Jesus' permission to change the law because I could not find a verse that stated "I the [L]ord [T]hy [G]od grants [Y]ou [J]esus, to change [M]y laws, rules, and regulations, so that [Y]ou may do whatever [Y]ou want with them". Then let me ask you this: if it is "so ridiculously easy to prove", then give me a verse from the Bible that says "something to the effect of", "You cannot be My follower till you have hated all children". You said "The hate has gotta stop people". I agree: I have treated you with respect, while you have said that I am "stupid", "pathetic", a "punk kid a$$", a "brainwashed idiot", a " moron", and a "racist bigoted vile pig". If anyone needs to stop hating, it is you. Where have I stated anything about one race being superior to another, or anything about races at all?