BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Anxiety Improves Performance

According to the www. Dictionary. Com, Anxiety is defined as "A state of apprehension and tension occurring in some forms of mental disorder" I"m sure everyone has felt worried or nervous before a test or sports game, But this does it really have a positive impact on performance? Sportspeople are some of the people most heavily affected by anxiety. Imagine being in the AFL Grand Final, Standing in front of a crowd of over 90, 000 people and having thousands of people counting on you to perform well and, Ultimately, Win. This is an excessive amount of pressure for anyone and can lead to serious health problems such as depression, Ulcers, Damage to the immune system and obsessive-compulsive disorder. A study in 2000 found that "sports psychologist have long believed that high levels of anxiety during competition are harmful, Worsening performance and even leading to dropout. " An example of this is John Daly, An American golfer who was once one of the best golfers of his time. The enormous amount of pressure placed on him to win made him extremely anxious. His anxiety reached such a severe level, That he was unable to complete a tournament and walked of the course in the middle of the round. Over the course of his career, He withdrew from 49 professional tournaments due to the anxiety he experienced. Anxiety can also have a number of negative impacts and changes to the body, Mind and behaviour. Anxiety causes your body to tense up and increases blood pressure. When this happens, It becomes more difficult for your body to move fluently and efficiently meaning actions and movements become jerky and misplaced. The terror you experience as a result of anxiety is so overwhelming it may even lead to body paralysis. An example of this is stage fright, Which may be experienced right before a public competition. When feeling overwhelming fear, The athlete may be unable to move, Talk or act at all. Athletes who suffer from anxiety often develop an inability to concentrate on the task at hand meaning they cannot give their performance their full attention. One of the most common symptoms of anxiety is shortness of breath, However this can become extremely dangerous as athletes often struggle to take in oxygen, Resulting in hyperventilation. This deprives the brain of a sufficient amount of oxygen, Leading to dizziness and/or fainting.
The Presuppositional worldview cannot justify its knowledge claims

Resolved: The Presuppositional worldview cannot justify its knowledge claims.The debate is structured as follows:Round 1 Acceptance, (no arguments)Round 2 Opening Statement from Pro, Rebuttal/Opening Statement from ConRound 3 Rebuttals/Closing Statement (no new arguments)Pro will accept the burden of proof. In this debate, the presuppositional worldview is the worldview that states that we cannot trust our autonomous reasoning as expressed by Greg Bahnsen and Cornelius Van Til. In order to win this debate, the Pro must show that the presuppositionalist worldview is either unable to make knowledge claims, self-refuting, or incoherent.A note about sources: Sources can be either included on the main debate page or linked to from the main page, example below. No arguments on the external sources page.As Bahnsen states:"To make God's word your presupposition, your standard, your instructor and guide, however, calls for renouncing intellectual self-sufficiency - the attitude that you are autonomous, able to attain unto genuine knowledge independent of God's direction and standards. The man who claims (or pursues) neutrality in his thought does not recognize his complete dependence upon the God of all knowledge for whatever he has come to understand about the world. Such men give the impression (often) that they are Christians only because they, as superior intellects, have figured out or verified (to a large or significant degree) the teachings of Scripture. Instead of beginning with God's sure word as foundational to their studies, they would have us to think that they begin with intellectual self-sufficiency and (using this as their starting-point) work up to a "rational" acceptance of Scripture. While Christians may fall into an autonomous spirit while following their scholarly endeavors, still this attitude is not consistent with Christian profession and character. "The beginning of knowledge is the fear of Jehovah" (Prov. 1:7). All knowledge begins with God, and thus we who wish to have knowledge must presuppose God's word and renounce intellectual autonomy. "Talk no more proudly: let not arrogance come from your mouth, for Jehovah is a God of knowledge" (1 Sam. 2:3). "(1)For Background:Readers might be interested that this debate was spawned by threads on the following two blogs (2,3). References:1. http://www.cmfnow.com...2. http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com...3. http://hezekiahahaz.blogspot.com...Reference example link: (this goes to my sources link)http://www.debate.org...
Warlocks are better than Hunters in Destiny

Sadly, my opponent fails to mention anything about the Hunters being more swagaliscious than Warlocks, therefore the round immediately goes to me. Furthermore, saying that those are the sounds of "gayness" means that you are, indeed, the gay one. How would you even know how gay sounds like? Obviously, you and the Traveler need to have a serious conversation about your sexual desires. Also, why do we need you to scout enemies when we can either shoot the giant glowing critical hit location or burn them alive? Your argument about agility makes no sense considering your pathetic armor. If an enemy has a seeking attack, you are going to die. "We can make a a shot with our Sniper/Scout rifle from extreme distances," Any player can take out another player with one shot. You are not special. Get over it. Calling us nerds is a compliment. If we are more wise than you, we will survive. We study a sentient being that made Venus, Mars, and the Moon hospitable, tripled human lifespan, and gave us the Golden Age technologies. You just run around in your sheets jumping around and staring at enemies rather than killing them. Burn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Warlocks are better than Hunters in Destiny

The Hunter class in Destiny is better than the Warlock clas because of multiple reasons Reason Numro One: The Hunters are not total nerds who do nothing but study the traveler all day. Us Hunters actually get out and protect the traveler from the forces of the Darkness. Reason two: What would the Guardians be without there Recon guys doing there jobs. These recon teams are comprised mostly of Hunters because of there high agility and their ability to sneak really well. Reason 2 part 1 THE SNEAK: Without this ability us Hunters would not be able to give you all the information on the enemies and extended information on the traveler that the enemy knew that we did not know. Also this ability lets us turn invisible. Reason 3: We look a whole lot better than your stupid ,but kinda awesome Dusters you wear ,but wait we have CLOAKS. What better way to run into battle than to be wearing an awesome cloak. Reason 4: This is the best thing about hunters we all see each other as brothers when we see one of us die [for real and not when the ghost revives him or whatever] but when he actually dies we take his cloak and promise to defeat the enemies that killed him. All what Warlocks have for each other are competition to see who's nerdier, who your study partner is, and to see who is the smarter out of the warlocks. Reason 5 Agility: We are faster than you slow Warlocks who are caught up reading a book or some crap. Also our reaction time is way faster than yours because of this we dont die as easily. Reason 6 Sharpshooter: We can make a a shot with our Sniper/Scout rifle from extreme distances all what you guys know how to do is use your fusion rifles anf fffffffwwwwwww pew pew pew pew pew pew. [Those were the sounds of gayness] [Fusion rifles charging and firing are the sound of gayness] Reason 7 Finale: We are Guardians why do we fight about this we are here to protect the Traveler and the people of Earth from the Drakness. Maybe we fight over things like this because we care about each other and our well beings as Guardians to one another. Nah Hunters are better than you nerds!
Kakashi was a good sensei

Hatake Kakashi - A fictional character from the series "Naruto". He is a elite ninja (jonin ranked) in the series and he is the assigned teacher to team 7 which consists of Sasuke Uchiha, Naruto Uzumaki, and Sakura Hurano. -http://en.wikipedia.org... Sensei- Japanese for teacher. This debate, Pro has to prove why Hatake Kakashi was a good sensei in the Naruto series, which they can prove by using sources or examples from the naruto manga, anime, or other reliable Naruto information My Arguments 1. Hatake Kakashi had three students Naruto, Sakura, and Sasuke. In the first arc of the series Kakashi mainly focused on training one student which was Sasuke. This is one of the many pieces of evidence that proves Kakashi failed at being a teacher, because he played favorites with his students. In the first arc while Kakashi spent the majority of his time molding Sasuke, he left Naruto's training to Ebisu and Sakura's training to nobody. 2. In the entire story Kakashi eventually loses all his students to other teachers. Sakura leaves Kakashi's teachings to learn from Tsunade (5th hokage), Naruto leaves to do training with Jiraiya, and Sasuke his most prized student takes Kakashi's teachings, turns his back on teamwork joins Orochimaru and is now using what he learned from Kakashi to plan an attack on the hidden leaf village. Point trying to be made: All of Kakashi's subordinate left him which means he wasn't good enough to teach them what they needed to learn. His best student left him because he was not strong enough to help him acquire the strength he wanted(Sasuke). 3. Kakashi eventually helps Naruto with his training, but left the tutoring tips to Asuma Sarutobi another Jonin to give Naruto tips in his training to master the wind element. Kakashi's basic teaching method for Naruto was basically "figure it out for yourself". Since Kakashi himself did not know how to perform the technique he was teaching Naruto, he really could not add much info. Conclusion: Throughout the whole series Kakashi had 3 students to teach and basically taught them little to nothing of what they know in the current up to date manga... or his teachings just did not sink in. Kakashi's 3 students eventually left him because he could not teach them the necessary skills they wanted or needed. Kakashi gave the new terrorist Sasuke Uchiha his most powerful weapon (Chidori) which will eventually be used to attack the leaf village. http://naruto.wikia.com... http://naruto.wikia.com... http://naruto.wikia.com... http://naruto.wikia.com... http://naruto.wikia.com... http://naruto.wikia.com...
There is no Link between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer.

My opponent has made a brazen claim which he has given no evidence whatsoever to back up. Smoking, as well as the lung cancer that accompanies it, dates back over 3000 years.[1] Tobacco is no new sophisticated drug, but an ancient herb that has been smoked since the earth was young. I would think it unreasonable to simply assume that such a time-honored practice of recreational drug use could never have developed in Hyrule. This claim begins to seem more absurd once one considers the many multiple universes all with their own Links. Over 157 million copies of The Legend of Zelda games have been sold.[2] In each of these, there is a separate Hyrule with a separate Link, and each universe plays out in a slightly different way, depending on the actions of the person playing the game. Not to mention, some people are way too addicted to Zelda[3], having played through the game multiple times. PRO asserts that there is no Link located between smoking and lung cancer, so I should hope that he can provide the whereabouts of these 100s of millions of Links in their respective Hyrules. Next, what about hacks? People can do just about anything to video games now-a-days, and being that The Legend of Zelda is a very common video game, many hacks have been developed for it.[4][5][6] Who's to say nobody has modified their copy of The Legend of Zelda to include some stoned hippies in it? I have no idea how PRO plans to prove this hasn't happened. I am horribly addicted to nicotine, smoking atleast 4 full packs of cigarettes daily, usually smoking 2 cigs at a time. In fact, I just took out my lighter from my back pocket, grabbed 2 loosies from my pack, and lit up. Now, my grandfather is dying of lung cancer (bless his heart!), so he knows the harms of cigarettes. He's been right behind me this whole time, scowling at me as I lit my joints. I'm currently keeping my eyes glued to the computer screen for fear of catching his wrathful gaze should I turn around. Why does this matter, you ask? Because that lighter in my back pocket happens to be this lighter: http://cgi.ebay.com... It's my custom-made Legend of Zelda cigarette lighter, complete with Link on the front. Link is currently located in my back pocket, behind the smoking cigarettes that are in my mouth and in front of the lung cancer located in my grand father. Thus, there is a Link between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer. PRO cannot prove that this is not so. But disregarding that, there's also some pretty solid evidence here: http://www.debate.org... You can unlock this scene in the game Legend of Zelda: The Minish Cap. [1] http://www.go4cigarettes.com... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org... [3] http://www.chickensmoothie.com... [4] http://www.romhacking.net... [5] http://wiibrew.org... [6] http://www.joystiq.com...
There is no Link between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer.

Link - a fictional character, a legendary swordsman dressed in green wielding a variety of abilities and equipment, and the main protagonist in Nintendo's The Legend of Zelda series of video games (http://en.wikipedia.org...(The_Legend_of_Zelda)) Smoking cigarettes - http://www.ubergizmo.com... Lung cancer - a disease of uncontrolled cell growth in tissues of the lung (http://en.wikipedia.org...) I contend that the very idea of a fictional video game character being between an action and a disease is preposterous. Link is currently in video games, and video games are concrete nouns that cannot be between a general action and a general disease. I await my opponent's explanation as to how a video game character got between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer. Good luck.
"pedophile" is a Blasphemy on Honored Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H)

In the name of Allah, Most Gracious Most Merciful.Forewords:I Thank My Contendersfor his Try to Respond to My Arguments.. He has not presented any contention for my Previous Arguments and Ignored them I would Accept his silence as his agreement with the arguments presented by me.."Truth is by nature self-evident. As soon as you remove the cobwebs of ignorance that surround it, it shines clear." -Mahathma Gandhi.I would like to remove the Cobwebs of Ignorance which caused my contender to write his last Argument._________________________________________Con says:muslims.org is His source (Islamic Source)Rebuttal 1:muslim.org is an Anti-Islamic website of Fake Islamists. (1)Hence the Source is not reliable and not of any worth._________________________________________Con says:Why did nobody directly challenge the age of marriage as reported in the Hadiths until the early 20th century?Rebuttal 2:It would not take Rocket-Science to answer my contender's Point.. Its better if you ask this Question to Those "Christian and Anti-Islamic Apologetics" who aroused a "False Propoganda" against Honored Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)now in 20th Century.They should answer "Why No Body until20th Century did not raise an Objection about Prophet's Marriages?"and They forgot What their Own Scriptures and Histroy says about "Historical examples of pedophilia, both personal and cultural."[sic] (2)Since in 20th Century they tried to "Desecrate" My Honored Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) Scholars had to see is it the right age? Since they found the source weak and we have many other reports and narrations so We have to Prefer them above this particular report. as I explained.____________________________________________Con says:How could the compiler of these Hadiths be diagnosed with Alzheimer's, a deisease not discovered until more than one thousand years after his death?[2]Rebuttal 3:1. The Book from which I extracted "When he was old, Hisham's memory suffered quite badly" and it was not in english book and it does not says Alzheimer!___________________________________________________________I apologize my use of word "Alzheimer" might have hurt my contender's intellect when I tried to make him understand with my commentaryThe Orignal Source does not says "Alzheimer's" it says "Hisham's Memory Suffered Quite Badly"Hence clarifies My Contender's Objection because "Memory Loss" has been for Ages..Conclusion:According to The Science of Narrations of Hadith all the narratives of marriage of Ayesha by Hisham ibn 'Urwah cannot be held true when it is contradicted by many other reported narratives, there is absolutely no reason to accept his narrative true when other scholars of such High Eminence, including Malik ibn Anas, say his narrative while in Iraq, are unreliable.1]fakeislamic.blogspot.com2] Statement of Contender
"pedophile" is a Blasphemy on Honored Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H)

My opponents counter argument has two, HUGE holes in it.1. Why did nobody directly challenge the age of marriage as reported in the Hadiths until the early 20th century?[1] (Islamic Source)2. How could the compiler of these Hadiths be diagnosed with Alzheimer's, a deisease not discovered until more than one thousand years after his death?[2]Sources1. http://www.muslim.org...2. http://en.wikipedia.org...
"pedophile" is a Blasphemy on Honored Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H)

Here are some videos of Muslim scholars who reject the interpretation you have offered above. The first is the most compelling, because this scholar states there are SEVEN, not one, but SEVEN, hadiths, many narrated by Aisha herself, which state she was betrothed at the age of six, and that the marriage was consummated when she was 9. He also states that "weak Muslims" attempt to claim she was eighteen because they are afraid to confront Christians with the truth. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com...
"pedophile" is a Blasphemy on Honored Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H)

My opponent's wordy repertoire is mostly irrelevant. This only contention I have made is that the Islamic "prophet" Muhammad (Six Feet of Dirt is Upon Him), was in fact a pedophile. My opponent, rather than rebutting this, has listed other historical examples of pedophilia, both personal and cultural. A Pedophile is a person who is sexually attracted to children.[1] A child is a person between birth and full growth. [2] Aisha was nine years old when the "prophet" had sexual relations with her, therefore, this "prophet" was in fact, by definition, a pedophile. Sources 1. http://dictionary.reference.com... 2. http://dictionary.reference.com...
"pedophile" is a Blasphemy on Honored Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H)

In the name of Allah Most Gracious Most Merciful.I said:"My Contender can FF the debate by saying "Agreed" if He has nothing to say so It would save time of Many.."- My contender have FF the Round.- I answered all His claims- My Arguments are Unrefuted.-He can not produce New Arguments in Last Round since I will not be there to answer them. as the Rules Go "No New Arguments in Last Round." Arguments Extended Contender FF. Conclusion:and say: "Truth has (now) arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish." -(Quran 17:81)
Things that Donald Trump (the worst president of all time) and god (both are unclean) have in common

First of all, Literally none of your statements are supported by facts that you have shown. This is a dumb way to start a debate, Because it makes you look like a complainer, And a prejudiced, Illogical one at that. I admit that some of your comparisons have merit. Let's Begin. First one I disagree with (and I'll be going out of order, Just hitting the ones that catch my eye) "Both Trump and god don"t care about what is right as long as they win. " Since you have already acknowledged the existence of the God that Christians worship (recap, He's omnipotent, Omniscient, And omnipresent), And you have also acknowledged the occurrence of events as recorded in the Holy Bible, (when you said that God did in fact "pray to [Himself]"). Under these assumptions, That are YOURS, Not mine, We can deduce the following. The God of the Christians, In the already established as proper evidence for this debate, Created the ENTIRE UNIVERSE. He created the laws and morals of men with the Forbidden Fruit. He defined what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, It makes no sense that " god don"t care about what is right as long as they win" He can do no wrong, Being the creator of right and wrong. That would be like telling the inventor of a game that he was cheating. Next: " god do not believe in peace and harmony unless it is under their guidance and rules of thumb" God, As previously established, Controls everything. No matter what, You ARE under his "guidance and rules of thumb". There is no escaping that. So there can LITERALLY be no peace and harmony without him, Because we don't know what an existence without God is like, Or if it's possible. You can not prove that peace can exist without Him, Which means that you can't prove that He's wrong to believe that. Next: " god have no idea, None, As to what true suffering, Pain and horror truly is. " According to the events of the Bible, Which we have established as historical evidence in this debate, Christ the Lord suffered for the sins of the world, Feeling the pain of all men (as a race, Not a gender). He bled from every pore, Then was nailed to a cross and hung there until death. If anyone has an inkling of what true suffering is, It's him. As for Trump, I doubt you have any idea what true suffering is either. I know I don't. I'll let you try to add some logic and facts to your argument. I'm done for now.
Things that Donald Trump (the worst president of all time) and god (both are unclean) have in common

Done, Are you? Not hardly. I will, This once, Attack someone with ad hominem. Let's begin, Shall we? Both YOU and Trump "do not believe in God. " Both YOU and Trump insult their opponents when they can't win. Both YOU and Trump are violent people. If we were in the same room having this conversation, I would have hit you by now. Trump also provokes violence. Both YOU and Trump " spew out supermassive hypocritical contradictions. " Both YOU and Trump "have these babbling mouths that never shuts up. " Both YOU and Trump "don"t care about what is right as long as they win. " You break the rules of honest debate to attack me. Both YOU and Trump "don"t give a damn about the poorest of the poor. " If I am some poor high schooler, Thrust into the world of online debate, Then you should be helping me grow, Help me become one of the few people of worth on this site, As you clearly disdain them all. Both YOU and Trump "react without thinking, Reasoning, Rationalizing, Using common sense, Using logic. " Both YOU and Trump "have no idea, None, As to what true suffering, Pain and horror truly is. " Never have you ever suffered yourself. Both YOU and Trump deny the facts Both YOU and Trump don't know their opponents, And should not be so quick to judge, This is what it has come to. And there is no round for your next illogical remark. Goodbye, Backwardseden.