The Bible morally contradicts itself

The con has clearly missed the mark on some of my major arguing points. i take responsibility for this, because i failed to make them as clear as a could. i would also encourage the con to cease his analogies involving human to human interactions because they do not bear with them the same wieght as a divine power to human interaction, thus they hold no purpose in comparing. likewise these lengthy comparisons make it difficult to clearly identify the cons anchor arguments. additionally the need has arisen for me to quote scripture, because the con has either misread or is plainly twisting the scriptures referring to hardening the pharaohs heart to better suit his agenda. side note becoming innocent by being covered in the blood of christ does not apply to the old testament, because there wasnt even a jesus christ yet. this shows flaw in cons understanding of the bible. the con opened up by stating that the Pharaoh hardened his own heart. this is actually true up until right after the sixth plague (being boils) was carried out at this point the bible stops saying pharaoh hardened his heart and changes it to what is said in Exodus 9:12 "And the LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh, and he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had spoken unto Moses.", the Gods word translation, and the Darby bible translation replace the word harden and state that god made Pharaohs heart stubborn. This proves that god does in fact hold responsibility for hardening the pharaohs heart at points during moses' time in egypt. later on in Exodus 10:1 the lord does it agian "And the LORD said unto Moses, Go in unto Pharaoh: for I have hardened his heart, and the heart of his servants, that I might shew these my signs before him:". next came the locust, but this time pharaoh admits to sinning against the lord (Exodus 10:16) and asked for forgiveness (Exodus 10:17). the locust were cast out and yet again in Exodus 10:20 "But the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, so that he would not let the children of Israel go." next darkness came for three days (Exodus 10:22), pharaoh then called for moses and said he could leave with his people, but not the flocks and herds. moses said he must have them for burnt offerings (Exodus 10:24-26) and yet again in Exodus 10:27 "But the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, and he would not let them go.". then the plague of the first born is presented Exodus 11:5"And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant that is behind the mill; and all the firstborn of beasts.".in Exodus 11:10 moses and aaron perform wonders before pharaoh, and again the lord hardens pharaohs heart. then the lord introduces passover. up until after the sixth plague pharaoh was responsible for hardening his own heart as is stated. however after that it is said that the lord hardened pharaohs heart. god did so because he wished to continue his wonders Exodus 11:9 "And the LORD said unto Moses, Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you; that my wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt." an all knowing god knows what the future holds, and thus knows the outcome of all things he does or doesnt do before they happen. god knows that pharaoh in the end would still change his mind and try to capture the slaves he lets go on his own unfluenced accord, but nothing god does is without purpose assuming he truly does know the future. god had all the plagues already planned out before pharaoh made any decisions at all, because the last plague sets the stage for the tradition of passover. god knew he would have to harden the heart of pharaoh in order to complete all of his wonders, and says he plans to harden his heart before moses enters into egypt Exodus 4:21 " And the LORD said unto Moses, When you go to return into Egypt, see that you do all those wonders before Pharaoh, whom I have put in your hand: but I will harden his heart, that he shall not let the people go." this alone shows gods pre-determained intent to guide pharaohs decisions, and by doing so god takes away the pharaohs free will. by no means am i defending pharaoh as a man who would have changed for the better if given the chance, but i am saying that god made him stubborn towards releasing the slaves after the sixth plague/wonder, and through the conclusion of the plagues. had god not hardened pharaohs heart there is no telling what the pharaoh exactly would have done, but what can be said is that whatever decisions he would have made would not have allowed for the compleation of the plauges and the introduction of the passover. if you say god had no affect on pharaohs decisions by hardening his heart, then you are also saying that god does things for no reason because pharaoh would have refused to let the people go until the death of the egyptian first borns regaurdless of weather or not god hardened his heart. As for the death of the innocent first borns. i would like to note that i do not require proving that any egyptians were innocent to win the debate, because this doesnt apply to the free will of pharaoh. through every plague pharaohs people suffered the repercussions of pharaohs true free will decisions up untill after the sixth plague. everything suffered after that was a result of gods pre-destined plan. all egyptians could have truley been evil/corrupt and it can only be viewed as assumption otherwise, because the scripture fails to mention the egyptian publics reactions to the wonders/plagues of god, but the old testament does allow for forgivness. the proceedings for forgivness of sin in the old testament was sacraficing a burnt offering. it is said that if a person unknowingly sins they are able to repent via burnt offering. the people of egypt were unknowing that there gods were false. when moses performed the plagues/wonders it can be assumed that atleast some of the egyptian public realized that moses god was the real god, because even pharaoh acknowleges that he has sinned against god and asked for forgivness. pharaohs fate was already sealed though, because god knew that once the slaves were gone pharaoh would attempt to reenslave them of his own free will. the same cannot be said about the rest of the egyptians, but the possibility of forgivness was not granted to the egyptian public. there fate was tied to there pharaoh. this means that once god began hardening the pharaohs heart the egyptian public was destined to suffer the plagues regaurdless of the state of there heart. assuming there was an egyptian family intent on following moses god they still lost there first born son because only the israelite public was given the passover instructions. the passover was simply about showing that the lord made a destinction between egypt and israel, and had nothing to do with only killing the corrupt or even soley the egyptians. the victems of the final plague also included the first born of a slave girl just because she grinds flour for the egyptians. the contradiction here was that forgivness is granted to the unknowing, yet even if egyptians sacraficed and repented as required they were still subject to the final plague. i have provided con with the scriptures required to support my claim that pharaohs free will was tampered with during the course of the plagues. in addition i have provided con with the reasons why the killing of the first born sons had nothing to do with killing the innocent or guilty, and by doing so have displayed that the innocent were also subject to the lose of there first born.