Call of duty Modern Warfare 3 is better than Battle field 3 as far as sales, campign, etc

First my opponent accuses that im saying its better cause its more desired. This is true in a way that it is better. Second my sources and this time i will give them. But me saying that Black ops campaign is similar is what i see. I dint look it up. I have beat the campaign and i have seen the Bf3 campaign very similar. You didnt respond back to my statement about people not having live. You said BF3 has co-op. Yes but the story campaign really only has 12 levels and 6 in co-op. so not that much fun. Second my opponent said we are talking about MW3 not cod Waw, i mentioned world at war because you said Bf3 has tanks and vehicles. I am showing that call of duty already did that and they dont want to make the same thing. Which is an example of creativity instead of a repeat. Also Bf3 i believe was originally a PC game when it was released. please clarify me if im wrong. you stated "BF3 extended the max player capacity by 40 players" The PC version supports 64 players in Mp and 24 on console. Bf3 isn't that creative besides graphics. Vehicle and soldier specialization(perks) are pretty much rip-offs from the Cod series (no originality) Bf3 has good graphics but there are problems with that. The graphics are good but it is very hard for people to see enemies in. (i will give you all my sources at the end of this round. Yes Cod is more mainstream because it has achieved what it deserves, as battlefield wasn't as popular. Jim sterling at destrucoid stated "Running at full spec, Battlefield 3 is a jaw-droppingly beautiful PC game and there's no denying that it's the new leader in terms of raw, unadulterated power. This has its drawbacks -- as stated, the graphics make spotting enemies incredibly difficult thanks to how much visual information is crammed into every environment. With the swirling dust, blinding lights and chunks of freshly-destroyed scenery filling one's immediate surroundings, actually getting a bead on something important can prove challenging. " Proves graphics are not always best. As stated in another magazine blog "These are interesting changes, not only because they've clearly been made with a huge audience of highly differentiated skill levels in mind, but because they show that massmarket game design doesn't mean dumbing down. Multiplayer has become more accommodating for everyone, and it makes COD better: how many players regularly clock up 15+ kills without dying? Controlling an attack chopper was a distant dream for most in MW2's multiplayer; in MW3 it's not easy, but it is attainable. " This proving my point that it does take alot technical skill not just hours of playing Also the fact that MW3 is a lone wolf type game is what fans love. Mw3 is bringing what fans want and thats what is more mainstream. They are bringing what the fans ask for. Heres some more things about the multiplayer comparison. Now both games do have good multiplayer. 1. Battlefield 3 doesn't let you play online with the same disc on two different consoles without additional payment, and it doesn't have local multiplayer. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 does both. 2. The local thing is a big deal you can actually multiplayer offline. You can he a friend in another room and play sytem link. Yea it was meant to play with alot of people but if you dont have live or just wanna play a game with a friend you can easily Voting issues 1. My opponent has not answered all my questions. 2. two of my sours, my opponent asked for the server source and the black ops source being similar in campaign. ( i stated that i played campaign and seen BF3's campaign and they are alike you can read the plot anywhere online for both, this is my knowledge and i cant just source my knowledge unless i got it from a website. 3. I attacked my opponents cases because he has a lack of argument with them. i have defended my topic really well. Here are my reasons Mw3 is better. 1. Spec ops, Survival, system link. Key factors considering people dont always have live and that many family's and people enjoy the living room gaming experience of playing against each other. 2. The online play gives advantages to team work and lone wolf. Game play is fast and theres action just about around every corner. Game dosent take hours of play to be good at. 3. Bf3 has large maps that are time consuming and sometimes people die before even getting across the map. 4. Mw3 has decreased in camping and theres more than one entrance to every building and very little camping due to fast pace action. As to Bf3 who added tanks for people to camp in. (Cod has already put tanks in one of their games not as original) 5. Mw3 offer ability to edit classes to further extent, along with call signs, Famous prestige mode, titles, emblems, accolades, stats listing, as Bf3 does have class options its not original as it almost a rip-off from Cod-games. Reviews show that BF3 shouldn't have tried to be like Mw3 and shouldn't have to try and copy simple things. 6. As state Bf3 co-op allows 6 levels of 12. 7. Mw3 has a better frame rate and frame rate is an issue for Bf3 heres my source on BF3 issue . http://forums.guru3d.com... 8. Mw3 Kill streaks give players a little extra to work for from being able to operate ac 130's, to calling in juggernaut rewarding players for doing good in a game. Here is a source for problems with Bf3. . http://www.egmnow.com... Here is my source for everything i have stated this round Reviews: . http://www.guardian.co.uk... Now the black ops thing is my knowledge but i did some research and heres a source on it being similar and what people think. This is a website someone posted that tells about the BF3 story which is pretty similar as it states it takes you through the eyes of soldier in past events and what not. . http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com...