Conservatives will be better off with Hillary as president, rather than Obama

Fianlly have some time to respond Some people actually have to work for a living and care for their children, rather than have petty arguments with liberal kids Not that you are a liberal- you are to the right of attila the HUN! : ) Now lets to the meat of this issue. First of all, NEITHER democrat will win the election- neither is qualified in any way shape or form to be president of the united states PERIOD. There is alot of excitement among the democrats, mostly about Obambi, as it should be - he is a well spoken man who knows how to give a good speech, use high minded rhetoric like JFK and MLK, and is genuinely seems more interested in (1) doing the right thing for the country, rather than for himself or the dems (2) working with and respecting the republican/ conservative point of view Now I am going to use the recent tete-a-tete between Clinton and Obama over what Obama said about Reagan. I assume you as I consider Reagan the closest thing we can say to have beena true core plain spoken conservative Obama cleverly said that he was a "transformative figure" , acknolwedging the fact that Reagan did carry like 49 states twice and cut the top marginal rate from like 70 to 28 percent , and preached small government. Now Clinton, MISREPRESENTED what he said, saying (emphasis added) HE JUST SAID REAGAN WAS GOOD ! DID YOU HEAR THAT?????? REAGAN! ARRRRRRRRGH! Reagan just drove them insane (the liberals- of which you say I am one) Now, obviously he WAS saying Reagan was good, being a SMART politician (much SMARTER than Hillary, mind you) He wants to get those millions of votes from the middle of the road conservative , whether D or R or , independents if you want to call them that. This is the majority of America when it comes down to it- just normal people living their lives, raising kids, enjoying themselves. He was taling to THEM, saying- hey I respect the conservative perpsective Hillary was right - and called him on it- but he was able to deflect it by saying "I didnt say they were GOOD ideas- I just acknowledged they were TRANSFORMATIVE in any case- this is a KEY exchange - it shows Barack is a SMART guy that is very important in a LEADER- the rhetoric may seem hollow, about everyone coming together etc etc, but of the candidates only he and the huckster ( and now McCain are talking about the strength of the people - versus government This is why Barack is a much better choice - and from YOUR perspective, Mr smooth, Iraq is WRONG is it Not? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm? so then Hillary would the the LIBERAL in voting FOR the invasion of Iraq and deponement of So_damn- insane. and Barack would be the CONSERVATIVE (in your wacky Ron Paul world) in NOT voting for , or at least taking a strong position against, the invasion of Iraq. Now I consider HILLARY to be right here. Believing myself to be a conservative, or generally a republican, I believe George W Bush was completely corrrect , that we SHOULD have gone into Iraq, an deposed so-damn. It was a great move, went well, and we finally getting rid of the insane lunatic terrorists from hell (Muhammed land) So Hillary here , in being more cautious in her rhetoric regarding Iraq, whereas Barack is playing to the foolish left and saying "troops home now!" etc, is MORE CONSERVATIVE , in MY view, and more LIBERAL, according to your wacky scale where you somehow agree with the super far left antiwar winguts, as are in abundance here in SF. I mean dont kid yourself- we are never leaving Iraq , or anywhere else we are. We are VITAL to the worlds security. And we NEED to have a presence abroad, to be withour allies, and be a constant deadly threat to our enemies- to keep them off base, and keep the fight at them, rather than allowing them to get away with suicide and other bombings, hijackings, mass murder, etc. ON Iraq, it was classic how we wound him COWERING, in a hole, dirty and unshaven and the people of IRAQ tried and hung him. Saddam will NOT be missed. this is a KEY issue- the war on terror I think Hillary would be better here perhaps, but its hard to tell WHAT Barack would do. This is why, when he gets nominated, he will lose to McCain. mcCain is the perfect media/ middle of the road/ experienced/ well known/ war hero, etc etc guy When the average voter goes into the booth, the #1 decision will be made on commander in chief Thats why MCCain will win, and probably big But IF the Demoncraps win, then I think it depends on how you look at conservative / liberal, but I think policy wise- they are similar. Barack, in my view, would make a better PRESIDENT than Hillary. She has stalinist tendencies, and her hubby is a narcissistic nut Dont forget HOW MANY PEOPLE DIED , either by mysetious "suicide" or weird accident, and how much money they got from the Chicoms and the Lippo group, and the payoffs , and the trashing of the office, and TOTAL COMPLETE UTTER CORRUPTION These Clintons are DANGEROUS, and thus ANY other choice is better forget the little spats about being a Wal-Mart executive and NOT taking a pro-union position when her fellow board member (she is paying for that as the SEIU just endorsed Obama, sealing her fate. Your opinion about Hillary being more opposable by the repubicans doesnt hold water If the arguments are about socialism and the implementation of it, remember the president doesnt really so anything except sign things- it will depend on the congress, and what bills are passed Clearly, becuase Hillary and the Clintons are totally corrupt, and willing to do or say anything, and lie and cheat etc- they cant be trusted in the White House- period. NOONE will benefit more from that.