christ never stated one damn word about being gay nor transgender.

Goonies gracious hellfire my pants are on fire because of genital problems with He-Man and and She-Ra showing me the way to a goose liver showdown with tinfoil brain dead love songs played again and again on death metal radio stations. Absolutely not am I short winded because indeed I DO KNOW WHAT i AM TALKING ABOUT and can prove it, whereas you guess at best. And wow have you utterly shown you shown this with a stamp on the forehead saying "duh I"m here" on your forehead of the apocalypse. See, I provide evidence. And what does the typical claims to be a christian do? That typical claims to be a christian runs from it. Naturally. That"s because dare the christian god ---ever--- be proven wrong especially with a slap to the face with that evidence proving this god to be wrong? Of course not. Now let's discuss your two main points in the second round of the debate. 1.) The first argument, which has the greater validity of the two, is on the reliability of the Scriptures = in which there is none. 0%. That was proven in RD3 with 2 videos and backup from the videos and what they said as well as common sense, reasoning, thinking, rationalizing, logical inspiration as to why god would ---never--- use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible unless this unproven god is a full blown moron, but we already knew that. 2.) The second argument is on the fact that no Christian follows Jesus truly. Which is true. You don"t. And naturally you completely avoided the ONE video in RD2 which 100% proves this. "What does that say about what Jesus' thoughts on homosexual and transgender people? It says absolutely nothing," yes that"s absolutely 100% true because 1. You don"t know what jesus was thinking, not ever. And you cannot take any guesswork at it no matter how hard you try. 2. And jesus said nothing about gays transgenders in the first place. Sure you can guess that he did. Sorry, that"s not good enough. And you cannot twist his words to suit YOU no matter how hard you try and or wish for this or that to happen. That"s how wars get started WITH EASE. Your christ sneezerag is the most fought after figure in the history of the human race and yet no one can even prove his existence. Here"s something to think about in which I just vidied this mornin"... "You"ve got 3 religions of peace all worshiping the same god of love and forgiveness, and yet they"ve been at war, continuously, ever since their inceptions." Aron Ra Its true and its pathetic. "To back up to my opponent's first point let us discuss the reliability of the scriptures." Let"s stop right there for a few dewdrops, because there is no reliability. None. Its an impossibility. Here"s a few tee hee"s out of thousands from a book that"s supposed to be perfect" MT 27:37 The inscription on the cross read: "This is Jesus the King of the Jews." MK 15:26 "The King of the Jews." LK 23:38 "This is the King of the Jews." JN 19:19 "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews." John 10:30 "I and my Father are one." The contradiction MT 27:46 Jesus asks God, the Father, why he has been forsaken. MT 27:46 " And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" "Note that the majority of historians all agree on four things regarding the life of Jesus." And who would these so-called "historians" be? Oh I get it, more like "creationists" you mean, ah yes. And ALL creationists are deviled egg companions to be smothered in burnt hamburger ash of their own toot toot tootering bile that they make for their own brewing coffee naps as they are all worthless. Why oh why do you ask? That"s because they cannot stand behind their product, namely their god, AT ALL. Not ever. They will NEVER put their god on trial again. They are not that stupid. They 100% know that they will lose every single time because they know that all they have to go on is faith based oriented. And faith is not evidence of any kind and would be tossed immediately. And since they cannot stand behind their product, how can ANYTHING they say be accepted as truth? Is a huge problem that no creationist can overcome. "1) Jesus died on a cross and was buried" Wow and yet your bible can"t even agree on something in regarding this" here you go" MK 16:1-2 The women came to the tomb to anoint the body. JN 19:39-40 The body had already been anointed and wrapped in linen cloth. MK 16:5, LK 24:3 The women actually entered the tomb. JN 20:1-2, 11 They did not. " 2) Jesus's tomb was empty and no one ever produced His body. Really? According to what? Oh Oh yeah WOMEN. In which case YOUR bible completely disrespects. And even then the stories change. MT 28:1 The first visitors to the tomb were Mary Magdalene and the other Mary (two). MK 16:1 Both of the above plus Salome (three). LK 23:55 - 24:1, 24:10 Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and "other women" (at least five). JN 20:1 Mary Magdalene only (one). MT 28:1 It was toward dawn when they arrived. MK 16:2 It was after sunrise. LK 24:1 It was at early dawn. JN 20:1 It was still dark. MT 28:1-2 The stone was still in place when they arrived. It was rolled away later. MK 16:4, LK 24:2, JN 20:1 The stone had already been rolled (or taken) away. MT 28:2 An angel arrived during an earthquake, rolled back the stone, then sat on it (outside the tomb). MK 16:5 No earthquake, only one young man sitting inside the tomb. LK 24:2-4 No earthquake. Two men suddenly appear standing inside the tomb. JN 20:12 No earthquake. Two angels are sitting inside the tomb. MT 28:8 The visitors ran to tell the disciples. MK 16:8 They said nothing to anyone. LK 24:9 They told the eleven and all the rest. JN 20:10-11 The disciples returned home. Mary remained outside, weeping. 3) Jesus's disciples believed that they saw Jesus resurrected from the dead. Well that"s silly. How can this be true if they didn"t even know what a resurrection was? Oh I get it, since they didn"t know, they invented the excuse. And its kinda not true anyway because of how sporadic and displaced your bible is and really can"t get its story right" MT 28:8-9 Jesus' first Resurrection appearance was fairly near the tomb. LK 24:13-15 It was in the vicinity of Emmaus (seven miles from Jerusalem). JN 20:13-14 It was right at the tomb. MT 28:9 On his first appearance to them, Jesus lets Mary Magdalene and the other Mary hold him by his feet. JN 20:17 On his first appearance to Mary, Jesus forbids her to touch him since he has not yet ascended to the Father. JN 20:27 A week later, although he has not yet ascended to the Father, Jesus tells Thomas to touch him. MT 28:7-10, MT 28:16 Although some doubted, the initial reaction of those that heard the story was one of belief since they followed the revealed instructions. MK 16:11, LK 24:11 The initial reaction was one of disbelief. All doubted. MT 28:1-18 The order of Resurrection appearances was: Mary Magdalene and the other Mary, then the eleven. MK 16:9-14 It was Mary Magdalene, then two others, then the eleven. LK 24:15-36 It was two, then Simon (Peter?), then the eleven. JN 20:14 - 21:1 It was Mary Magdalene, then the disciples without Thomas, then the disciples with Thomas, then the eleven disciples again. 1CO 15:5-8 It was Cephas (Peter?), then the "twelve" (which twelve, Judas was dead?), then 500+ brethren (although AC 1:15 says there were only about 120), then James, then all the Apostles, then Paul. MK 16:14-19 The Ascension took place (presumably from a room) while the disciples were together seated at a table, probably in or near Jerusalem. LK 24:50-51 It took place outdoors, after supper, at Bethany (near Jerusalem). AC 1:9-12 It took place outdoors, after 40+ days, at Mt. Olivet. MT 28:16-20 No mention is made of an ascension, but if it took place at all, it must have been from a mountain in Galilee since MT ends there.) 4) Jesus's disciples were transformed following their alleged resurrection observations. Transformed into what? Barbie dolls who eat spin-itch? You are so gullible. Oh please, there are billions that doubt jesus"s existence. As the vidies in RD3 prove. And probably a good third of the world has not even heard of this unknown jesus. The people"s the Brazilian rainforest, the aborigines, Buddhists, Hindus, etc. In other words don"t make things up as you go in order to gain attention for your sorry reareth endeth which at this point only expels granny farts in comparison. "The current translation"" What current translation would that be that differs greatly from each other? "is translated from the earliest manuscripts which are tested against each other for historical accuracy." Oh absolutely they are not as they take great liberties whenever they feel like transporting different wording from a thesaurus to trump up a yodeling grunge country opera meaning with no original to race back to anything so 0% of the population knows if they are interpreting correctly. AND since this is true YOUR god if reasonably intelligent WOULD NEVER use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible as mentioned in serious depth in RD3 in which you didn"t even pay attention to the quotes from those who 100% know a lot better than you as well as the vidies which also know a lot better than you and I"m not going to get into it with you again because you are flat out ignorant and wrong on this subject. "If it is not satisfying that there is no originals you are being completely ridiculous." No you are being completely ridiculous. How do you know you are reading ANY correct text without a source to trace it back to anything in existence? That"s just like saying The Big Blue Book 3,000 years down the road, in not having an original to be able to trace it back and missing "See Spot Run" would be an acceptable interpretation. The bible is NOT evidence. I'm out of space. Sheesh.