The Big Bang Theory Never Happened

Let us Google “The Big Bang Theory” The first 3 web sites that come up are http://www.cbs.com... http://the-big-bang-theory.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... These are all dedicated to a TV series. Let us click on the Wikipedia page: “The Big Bang Theory is an American sitcom created by Chuck Lorre and Bill Prady, both of whom serve as executive producers on the show along with Steven Molaro. All three also serve as head writers. It premiered on CBS on September 24, 2007.[5] The seventh season premiered on September 26, 2013.[6]” (See the Wikipedia page for the citations [5] and [6]. The other two webpages confirm that “The Big Bang Theory” happened as well.) Apparently, “The Big Bang Theory” happened on September 24,2007 for the first time. My burden of proof is to show that some “The Big Bang Theory” happened. I have proved that the most popular “The Big Bang Theory” did indeed happen. Pro may wish to concede at this point. Pro has argued in this round that the less popular “The Big Bang Theory”, a theory that describes the early stages of the universe as we know it, did not happen. By that I understand that he claims that the core thesis of this theory, that the universe is expanding because of some kind of giant explosion, is false. This Big Bang Theory has been accepted by mainstream scientists. The Big Bang Theory (BBT) was first proposed by Georges Limiter, and then other scientists built upon this model. Edwin Hubble discovered, that there is a correlation between the distance of galaxies and their redshift. The speed at which the galaxies move away from us can be measured by the redshift. Looking at all the distances and velocities of the galaxies, we see that, interpolating backward in time, that all matter in the universe seems to originate from one point in space and time. The idea is in essence very simply and convincing. If at some point and time we see circular waves in a pond, we can deduce that something happened at a certain point in time at a certain position in the pond that caused a splash. Alternative explanations such as the “steady state model” and “plasma cosmology” for some of the observations have been dismissed by the scientific communities. Let me rebut pro’s arguments. “Case 3: Life would not be here, even if the Big Bang Theory would have happened. Think, all living life on other planets would have died on neighboring planets due to no air, no or frozen water, or not a stable atmosphere! If the cells would have even come from planets, wouldn't they have burnt up in our atmosphere?” First of all, The Big Bang Theory does not explain everything. For example, the origins of life are hardly explained by BBT. Instead, you should look at Evolution Theory. But I do not see how BBT contradicts life on earth. If you DO think that BBT contradicts life, please explain further. “Case 1: Where did all our elements come from?” This is explained here: http://www.einstein-online.info... “We would have to have so many different neighboring planets. More than our solar system can possibly imagine!” How that so? Can you explain? “Case 4: Where did the planets come from.” “About a billion years after the Big Bang, gravity caused these atoms to gather in huge clouds of gas, forming collections of stars known as galaxies. Gravity is the force that pulls any objects with mass towards one another -- the same force, for example, that causes a ball thrown in the air to fall to the earth. R32;R32;Where do planets like earth come from? Over billions of years, stars "cook" hydrogen and helium atoms in their hot cores to make heavier elements like carbon and oxygen. Large stars explode over time, blasting these elements into space. This matter then condenses into the stars, planets, and satellites that make up solar systems like our own.” Source: http://www.exploratorium.edu... “Case 2: http://rense.com...; 33 scientists suggest that the big bang theory is wrong and they support the conspiracy theory that tens of thousands of theoretical physicists would trade in their integrity for financial gain in the form of funding. And what about these 33 scientists? For example, Lerner, wrote a popular book “The Big Bang Never Happened”. Would his book have been as successful, if it had supported the “Big Bang Theory” and it had to compete with hundreds of other books that support Big Bang Theory? May he have a financial gain? Just sayin’. Anyway, his book, and the arguments in the link, have been debunked: Stenger, Victor J. (Summer 1992). "Is the Big Bang a Bust?". Skeptical Inquirer 16 (412). Wright, Edward L. "Errors in "The Big Bang Never Happened" http://www.astro.ucla.edu... "Big Bang Theory Makes Sense of Cosmic Facts; No Contradiction", New York Times, June 18, 1991 "Did the Big Bang Happen?", New York Times, September 1, 1991 Finally: GOD AND THE BIG BANG THEORY Statement from my opponent: “For you to view the big bang theory possible, it is more than likely you do not believe in god.” Pro is correct in assuming that I am an atheist. But then again, it is also written in my profile. I am an atheist despite I support the Big Bang Theory!! Remember, George Lemaitre, the one who came up with the idea of the Big Bang? Besides being a scientist, he is also a catholic priest. But like any good scientist, he did not let his religion interfere with science. Besides, Catholicism is compatible with the Big Bang Theory. Pope Pius XII declared in 1951 that Big Bang theory does not conflict with the Catholic concept of creation. The Big Bang theory is also compatible with Islam. In fact, the Quran even predicted the Big Bang according to Quran scholars: http://quran-m.com... In order to proof his case, PRO must prove that the TV series "The Big Bang Theory" never happened, as well as show that the Big Bang, as an explanation of the early universe, never happend.