Walmart Stampede

Whats up with the assumption on your part that I will be rude? I only react when people attack me on a personal level and they always start it, not me. So in a sense you open this debate with an unfounded accusation. You have no reason to even think I would be impolite. Remember who started it. Now on to the debate. I do accept your video as a source, I accept all sources no matter where they come from. They are all sources of information and all sources should be considered in any debate no matter what the topic. People who reject sources based on their source without even considering or reading the substance of the source are usually unable to dismiss it using science or some other form of logical explanation. I watched your video and it absolutely proves that nothing will be done to locate or apprehend any of the people involved in the death of the Walmart worker. The news media outlet in this video has already tried and convicted Walmart as being 100% liable for not having enough security on hand. They make no mention what so ever about the people responsible nor do they even mention that any kind of investigation will be made into apprehending those responsible. They don't even interview a single police officer. As far as they are concerned it is case closed, it's Walmarts fault. Let me pose a question to my opponent. Suppose they hired a police officer, and it still happened would Walmart still be liable. Why should a store have to hire a police officer to open their doors for business? If Walmart has to do this in order to protect itself from liability then every single store in the US should have to bear the same burden and expense. If other stores don't have to do this and Walmart does then I guess the whole concept of "Equality under the law does not apply" Next my opponent wants Walmart to predict the actions of people on a daily bases and hire the police to open their doors for business when they think people will stampede the doors and kill it's employees in order to protect themselves from liability. Again if Walmart has to do this then every single store in the US should have to do the same thing. Equal protection under the law. Now lets look at other situations where people are killed in stores and public buildings. Should all McDonalds be required to have armed guards in their stores at all times to prevent raving lunatics from killing all of it's customers to protect it's self from liability? Should the post office have to do the same thing? My opponent wants to place blame where it does not belong. We are human beings with the ability to think. We are not a bunch of cattle that can be spooked by a loud noise. What happened here is called a riot. And the perpetrators of this riot need to be brought to justice and held accountable. My opponent places the impossible task of making business predict human behavior in order to protect them selves from liability for the actions of others. This is illogical and ridiculous. Instead we should make examples of those involved, publicly humiliate them, sue them and throw them in jail. This will not happen again if people know they will suffer consequences for their actions such as these. But we all know who has the deep pockets and we all know nothing will be done to bring anyone to justice. Walmart will bear the full burden and those responsible will walk away scott free.