It's time to stop depraved madmen from breeding two-headed human freaks at the taxpayers' expense

Religious people are against aborting their unborn children. That is a common belief in most religions, and especially in this couples. "Evil, calculating Mike Pedance, an unemployed nuisance caller," Just because he was in between jobs, it does not mean he is a 'benefit-scrounger.' What happens when you are told that you have almost no chance of getting pregnant (as they were) you stop using protection, as their is really no need. The baby easily could have been an accident, and the husband has probably been looking for a better job, so he could afford a family. "This benefit-scrounging former telesales agent is deliberately planning to bring a baby with two heads into the world, even though the doctors at the wicked couple's government-funded hospital advised them to terminate the pregnancy." They had good reasoning, their chances of getting pregnant again is slim to none, and the twins have a chance of survival, and a fairly good life: The mother said: "I'd been diagnosed with polycystic ovaries in the past, which harms a woman's chances of children. Over the years I've been for so many tests and check-ups I'd virtually given up hope. But on December 18th I finally found I was pregnant. Naturally Mike and I were so, so pleased. We'd waited so long and been through such a lot together." "They told sinister-looking Pedance and grossly overweight Chamberlain that if the pregnancy were allowed to reach full term, the mutant baby would have only 20% chance of survival." It hardly seems fair to call a women obese, the disease she has (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome) causes weight gain. A 20% chance is still a chance worth taking, if it means a possible chance of having children, when you will most likely never get pregnant again. 20 % is better then the slim to none chance of her getting pregnant again. "Nevertheless, these depraved potential parents are refusing to sanction an abortion and are insisting that the taxpayer funds the hospital treatment necessary during Chamberlain's pregnancy and beyond. As you can imagine, given the extent of the foetus' disabilities, if the infant does survive, the long term cost to the taxpayer will be enormous." Life can be expensive sometimes. But that doesn't meant we should force death. "Even though he is not married to Chamberlain and has, therefore, engaged in pre-marital sex, Pedance claims to be a devout Catholic and says the foetus is a 'gift from God'." They were engaged. And do not judge person's religious views when you have not spoken to or meant them. "'No it jolly well isn't, you frothing nutjob, if anything it's a gift from decent hardworking taxpayers like me.' That's what I would say if I met him. So, what do you think? Is it right that hard-pressed taxpayers should fund a religious madman who wants to inflict pain and suffering on his future child by allowing it to be born with horrific abnormalities? I think not. If you agree, please vote Pro." How do you know that he is a 'religious mad man' it didn't say he was in the article, nor did it lead you to believe he was, you haven't talked to him or meant him. You negatively judged them with no reasoning, evidence, or proof behind it. And his children could live very happy healthy lives. Abigael and Brittany (Girls born with the same condition) are eighteen and living happy healthy lives, who says their twins couldn't?