People high in American government must take an I.Q. test

I would first like to rebut the opponent's cases and then present mines. Rebuttal I. I will summarize the opponent's first case which is "Already major problems. " He let's the audience and me know that politicians hold the Americans people future in their hands, which none of us can deny. He talks about the Obama Medicare plan that dragged the United States into a greater debt. He then ends telling us that they should prove their intelligence. First I'd like to state that all Politicians attend College, I will take Barrack Obama for example he attended the University of Harvard. Not only did he attend it but he graduated from it, I don't know what my opponent believes that Barrack Obama and all the other Politicians learn in school, but I know for a fact that they learn how to make those decisions that my opponent believes they need to prove to him that they can make. I would also like to tell him something about Barrack Obama Medicare plan, every single person in this world can make a mistake wether he is the most intelligent person in the world or the dumbest. Everybody makes mistakes, is part of our nature. I believe that the opponent repeats himself in his case #2. Therefore the same rebut I present in paragraph one the same goes here. In case #3 he believe the I. Q. test should be publicized. I will tell this to the opponent we live in a Democratic society therefore when the people want someone out of government, they will take him out. Now the problem here is that the American citizens are lazy, they don't take the time to know what there voting for nor take the time to learn the Politician's history and work ethics, which the United States government enforces that they show and tell the public before elections. In case #4 he states that the public should have the final decision in the removal of the Politician according to the test results of the I. Q. test that the Politician took. I tell this to the opponent should we really, depend upon an I. Q. test to put a Politician into office or take him/her out? I know many students that are super intelligent yet may fail a test because there not feeling up to it, or at that time have a lot going through their mind hundreds of reasons. The opponent somewhat desires a country in which the Politician's are assigned to office by the results of a test, to be quite honest that would be a country I wouldn't like to be a part of. Case I. I believe one of the reason why the voting age is 18 is because, the government believes that at this age a person has enough intelligence to make thoughts and ideas for himself and not with the thoughts of others. Therefore at the age of 18 a citizen can bring forth the thoughts of the politician and his and make a voting to his liking and favoring. Which is why this country is by far compared to the rest of the world a country in which you're voice can be heard and where true democracy lives. I believe this is the best way to bring a Politician into office or take him out. My opponent obviously believe that an I. Q. test will be a better judge of character and intelligence then the millions of citizens that vote. Conclusion. My conclusion is simple, the people vote for who they believe will best represent them and their neighbors and friends. What will an I. Q. test prove? That a Politician can study for a test and get a 100.00% and all of a sudden that makes him fit to run a country or a job in the government? A good Politician is one who has dedicated their entire life to their studies, and believe that with their knowledge and the help of the public they can make a better country. My opponent desires to take those crooks and twisted Politicians out of office, I believe we should but not with an I. Q. test but by showing the country and It's citizens that he/she is not fit for that job nor is he doing the job a Politician is supposed to be doing. Then we will have a better country. Thank you cote Con!