Donald Trump

My opponent begins by stating that he opens with an asinine assertion because he wants to behave as asininely as possible. the definition of asinine is "extremely foolish" we should not uphold the ideas of someone who propagates extremely foolish ideas knowingly. My opponent then goes on to state that supply-side "trickle down" economics is the worst. However, his Keynesian economics only works if you assume that the wealthy just shove their profits into their mattresses. which of course is preposterous since it's impossible to become rich in that manner. it cannot be done. you use your profits to expand your business which creates more jobs for more people which then allows you to make more products to be purchased by more people so you make more money and the cycle continues on and on. Supply-Side is in every way better than Keynesian economics. There is always work to be done. With the exception of those who are mentally ill, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to find work. it may not be good or easy work, but enough to buy a meal and eventually rent a small house if you find another person to help make the money. For those who are mentally ill, I would suggest a return to the days before deinstitutionalization where private institutions can help them. if you want to continue adding "zing" go ahead. It can only harm your professionalism. My opponent continues his dedication to being as asinine as possible by stating that ISIS will just leave us alone if we don't attack them. Let's not forget who started this. They attacked us first, they drew first blood. now, it's up to us to make sure they can't hurt people ever again. If an atomic bomb is coming at me, I could try to fight it, but I would fail because it's an atomic bomb. I can't fight a nuke. much in the same way, if we keep the pressure on ISIS they won't be able to fight us. Let's also set the record straight. You won't get any argument from me over the choice between peace and war, but the only guaranteed way you can have peace is surrender. My opponent's policy of neutrality in this kind of war is surrender. And we as Americans will sacrifice for peace, negotiate for peace, we will not surrender for peace now or ever. We have the duty as a bastion of liberty to never allow the enemies of freedom to dictate the course of life on this planet. My opponent suggests that ISIS hasn't been killing people for years. False. there have been 140,000 large-scale terrorist attacks since 1970 www.start.umd.edu/pubs/START_AmericanTerrorismDeaths_FactSheet_Oct2015.pdf While it's true that the terrorists don't pose an existential threat to the United States as a nation, they are certainly an existential threat to individual Americans. And it is for that reason that the government has an obligation to defend citizens against threats foreign and domestic, and that includes terrorists. No Frankfurter, I don't believe in chemtrails. logic dictates that claim isn't true. do powerful world leaders breathe air? yes. therefore it is illogical to believe that they would poison themselves. If anyone has bought into fearmongering by the media it's you with the Trump hysteria. Securing the border isn't racist, sure some chinese people are nice but that doesn't mean we should make trade deals that benefit them instead of us. I l i k e t r u m p you communist bastard.