Altruistic behavior is impossible. (psychological egoism)

I must try to be brief. There really is no proof for anything so all of my statements are therefore just assumptions based on logic. But they are assumptions backed up by a lot of evidence. Some of them will be bold. Criticize if you wish.Your question P.S.2: There is nothing that can not be explained by logic. The only limit of logic is information. Either logic is perfect or it's completely useless. Either it's God or logic, take your pick. If you can find a single flaw in either, you're wholly justified in throwing the whole thing away as pure rubbish. If there is a god it would be illogical which would mean that god created logic as a perception and therefore it is just a lie. No more real than schizophrenia or a hallucination. There are no observable flaws in logic yet. There are also no flaws in a god existing based off of the fact that there is no evidence. What kind of a claim is a claim with no evidence?Different logic? That is not logic at all it is belief. Just because it is belief does not make it wrong it just makes it illogical and it doesn't 'explain' anything. You contradicted yourself by using 'explain' and 'no apparent reason' in the same sentence. If good is done for no apparent reason is it really good?To claim that Shamans, Shaolins, Dalai Lama, or Saints are anything more than humans or that they understand anymore than a human can is not only illogical but irrational without any proof. Love cannot be explained logically and therefore does not really exist. It is only a perception created by humans to explain the social relationship between 2 people which is only meant to reproduce. In cases where people don't have sex (which is rare but just in case you refute) it can be explained as a mutually beneficial social agreement.It seems that your argument is against only the proof of if empathy is related to mirror neurons. There is no absolute proof for anything and it is something we don't completely understand as the study of psychology has only started a little more than a hundred years ago. It is hard to argue against the strong evidence presented. I copied and pasted the mirror neurons wikipedia empathy section that has sites if you look."people who are more empathic according to self-report questionnaires have stronger activations both in the mirror system for hand actions and the mirror system for emotions, providing more direct support for the idea that the mirror system is linked to empathy. Some researchers observed that the human mirror system does not passively respond to the observation of actions but is influenced by the mindset of the observer. Researchers observed the link of the mirror neurons during empathetic engagement in patient care."- http://en.wikipedia.org...As for your opinion on the burden of proof that is fair enough for me. It does not change the fact I think the burden of proof is on the one who argues that altruism exists without any evidence or logical explanation on what it really is.I debate so that I can read the arguments against my opinions so I can try to convince my self I am wrong while at the same time try to convince my self I am right. I do this in hopes of making my self wiser like you. I also do it to make my self a better logical thinker because I think that everything can be explained by logic. But I do do it to be right. I want to know the answer and ultimately to get to the answer I can accept that I can be wrong. I don't think I am wrong because you have said nothing to show even the slightest amount of evidence that I could be wrong. Your only arguments are belief in the possibility that there could be some higher power that explains everything. I'm sorry and I don't mean to criticize but I don't understand how you can even call this a debate when your arguments are based on belief and a lack of understanding rather than at least attempting to give meaning to things using logic. It seems like you are just unwilling to accept my explanation based on what you have perceived and grown up thinking your whole life rather than because you think my explanation is illogical or irrational. I don't mean to impose my opinion or degrade yours. I am only expressing my opinion. How you choose to view it is your choice.With all that being said I conclude and wish you luck.I hope that you answer my questions and that I have answered your questions to your satisfaction. Even though this is the last round If you have any questions I can answer them through message and we could continue the discussion if you wish.