Adults shouldn't be forced to wear seat belts.

wow i guess insults are allowed in this one, >.> 1)okay so against your first point you say how the 9/11 doesnt connect to why people would want to use seatbelts, however only those who does not use their "common sense" cannot come to the connection. what i was merely stating was that because of how events are taking place today that increases our risks --"events such as"-- like nuclear proliferation, certain technological advancements like the manipulation of viruses(maing harmful). Making society now further in a state of fear and that we have the obligation to urge for things that can secure their state of security to show how the government is in its power stabolizing society, although you bring up how the government should not force the people id like to remind you that we are in a state that we can change things and if the people really wound not want seatbelts then it wouldnt have been there, however this is not the case. Also some may not agree with that is said so id like to provide another reason: if a government urges for that which is beneficial, and since it is common knowledge that seatbelts can protect people, we see then that the government becomes more legitimate as it urges only for the protection of people, we should not consider the lack of thought that seatbelts should not be used because the government is forcing the people but that it only does so for it to become rational in the things it needs to do, and to actually allow for society to not lack order and be allowed safety against what can harm. 2) Also if we look to then how if the govt would not urge for the use of seatbelts and allow for more damage in society(people with out seatbelts would harmed greater--risk) then cant we see that we can then say the government should be blamed for it, because it could have done something--urge for seatbelts; clearly its legitimacy then becomes at stake-- therefore not only does it become a need for the govt to urge for seatbelts but it becomes an obligation to do so. 3) Also it was stated how the govt is not urging but forcing in his second point, but he also states that "you should also be able to accept the responsibilities of your actions" however how do you become responsible when no consequence is made by your actions? By having policies like the seatbelt use, going against it would actually allow for the statement that he believes, people can then actually become responsible for their actions; as their would be a consequence. 4) "I think it is demoralizing to think that the government thinks so little of me that it makes laws to protect me from myself." well i ask if there is a need to (you know ... think of you, just getting you back for saying im pathetic)... moving to the point ... I say, that you would probably concede to the fact that you have no control, you can't ensure that probably there will be a day where you have a car accident. Thus the govt would not force seatbelts because its people is not capable for themselves but that it urges because accidents are always a possibility and it probably knows that not anyone can control their future thus it feels the need to even when there would be an accident the damage created could be less by urging the use of seatbelts. as you concede the people "should" do. 5) and also you say that trying to increase the value of life is a fantasy. However, the only thing that i am trying to urge is that people should value life and the things you are presenting and how you are presenting yourself is detrimental to its value, you say that the government shouldnt force people to be safe but if this is what it does then injustices would only be created, when it does not do preventative action, as was given by one of my previous point this now is only in general, then the consequence is that nothing can be done or little can be done whenever a situation actually occured that can harm. Oh, and i dont even know a thing about psychology, i havent taken it yet, maybe when i get to college, but yeah. 6) and lastly you compare seatbelts to big things such as sports and such, but these actually are different in the issues they provide; seatbelts only take a minute time to put so why not. These sports, even when it has risks, can actually create a better life for some. And also i dont see the connection between the comparisons ... oh wait i do, i can actually connect things... the problem though is that again they provide different issues... this one topic is just one that i think should not be urged for. As an ending statement, Adults should be role models to society and should urge for the better of everyone. Thats why we should and ought to negate. and please dont set precendents in insulting as here you see i am influenced >.>