"Pinning the homosexuals" is a terrible idea

Disclaimer: Because of the dropped arguments, I may not believe everything I say in this argument so this round may not reflect my views. The BOPI will concede Argument 1: Jesus was not against homosexuality for time purposes. However I still have too other arguments to fulfill BOP 1. Rebuttals "Pro said, "Jesus taught redemption, not condemnation. " Yes, Jesus did teach that, but he also taught condemnation. Matthew 23:14 says, "THEREFORE YE SHALL RECEIVE THE GREATER DAMNATION. " Sounds rather harsh, don't you think, Pro? If homosexuality is a sin, and Lev 20:13 says it is, then homosexuals are damned to Hell. Jesus will not contradict His Word. " Basically we are all doomed to hell unless we accept Jesus, so homosexuals are no different. The thing is, Jesus said to save everyone we can, however there will be those who do not accept. That is not condemntion. "Well, some sins are worse than others. For example, a murderer is worse than a jay walker. A serial killer is worse than a drunk speeding through a red light. And ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE, God burned Sodom and Gomorrah to the ground for homosexuality(Genesis 19). That is, He burned ALL THE WOMEN, ALL THE CHILDREN, ALL THE QUEERS, AND ALL THE ANIMALS, save Lot and his daughters. "I do not see anywhere in Genesis 19 where it said God burned them down for homosexuality. God burned them down for sin, including all kinds of sin. "By that standard, putting the homosexuals behind an electrified fence is not harsh at all, when you consider Sodom and Gomorrah! Now, if some of those homosexuals got right with God and accepted Christ as their Saviour, I would have NO PROBLEM LETTING THEM OUT. But until then, they should pay for their sins. "I was going to say seperation of Church and State, but that is not what this debate is about. Anyways, that is another reason of it not working. Everyone in there would just pretend and get out. "Pro says, "No, I never said that they only have teachings like that. " Really, I will repeat YOUR WORDS as your memory seems to be failing you. Pro(YOU) SAID, " Jesus, Paul, and James all have teachings in which they:Only list Justices "You said "ONLY" my friend, not me. "I said they have teachings where they only listed justices. However, I did not say that they only have teachings where they only listed justices. You were using the only in the wrong place. Anyways, that argument was dropped anyway. "Pro said, "It indicates that following Jesus in his original Jewish society may not bring peace to a family, but may "split" it up, the function of a metaphorical sword. " That still doesn't really "jive" with "bless your enemies" now does it? "It may split the family up because not all members may accept Jesus. I do not see how that contradicts "Love your enemies". "Now if we built a large fence to contain the queers on one side, and lesbians on the other, they would die out because they can't reproduce. There is no argument there. My opponent is arguing, though, that heterosexuals would still be giving birth to queers. This is not true. First, queers are not born, they choose to be that way. If someone was considering being a homosexual, they would think twice if they knew they would be locked behind an electric fence! "First, I have already proved with science that homosexuals are born. A homosexual may not engage in homosexual acts, but he would still be considered a homosexual. And yes, they would think before engaging in homosexual acts, but again, you would think that thieves would think before stealing, etc. Anyway, no sources for this round except for the Bible.