Do Christians have the real Bible? Christian Vs Muslim Perspectives

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,My opponent has thus far failed to answer the following list of contentions: Provided evidence for an authentic Biblical canonical codex. Provided a single Bible formed based on solely Patristic quotes. Provided empirical evidence for MSS predating P52. Provided a single canonical codex that is in harmony with any other canonical codex. Provided any two MSS which agree with each other. To add to this, he repeats that the NT is historically reliable but was unable to prove so, instead what he has done is alter the meaning of the word 'contradition' to that of being a 'variant'. To educate him, a variant is a contradiction bewteen two MSS, because...they 'vary'! What's most important however is that he never qualified his argument in support of the main topic: "Do Christians have the real Bible?", if he had the real Bible, why didn't he name it? He was unable to produce a single canonical codex's name or link or picture. Therefore conceding to my argument that it does not exist, for if it did, he could have showed us. The use of 2 Tim. 3 was ignorant on his own behalf and does not reflect on the 'inspired nature' of the NT, as the text is in sole reference to the Tanach. Therefore he misapplied a verse from his own Bible as I amptly demonstrated. As for the case of 2 Peter, his link refers to a Mr. Wayne Stiles who's own work concedes to it's inauthenticity:"Quite probably the churches which originally received it, knowing it not to be Peter’s own work, would not have granted it the same status in their own use as they did, e.g., to the Pauline letters. . . . Whatever the reasons for its lack of wide use in the second century, this seems to have contributed to its very slow progress toward general acceptance into the canon."[1]What's worse is not only could Jacob not provide any evidence for a coherent, non-varying codex of the NT, he was relegated to spurious claims of fragmented MSS:"On 1 Feb 2012, I debated Bart Ehrman ... I mentioned that 7 NT papyri had recently been discovered— 6 of them probably from the 2nd century and one of them probably from the first.These fragments will be published in about a year."[2]No physical evidence, just someone claiming that they 'probably' have something. These MSS being probable does not make the pro-argument absolute, as it is equally likely to be 'probably' not from the first or second centuries. In either case it's irrelevant as it's not a full MSS, just a partial fragment of one papyri. Jacob then repeats the claim that variants are not contradictions. A contradiction is defined as: "Inconsistency; discrepancy.a statement that is at variance with itself".[3] He then claims that Bart Ehrman says they are insignificant but does not qualify this claim. However I can provide ample claims to the contrary: The Trinity Verse of 1 John 5:7 [4]:"It is missing in all the earlier Greek manuscripts, for it is found in no Greek manuscript written before the 16th century. Indeed, it is found in only two Greek manuscripts of any age - one the Codex Montfortianus, or Britannicus, written in the beginning of the sixteenth century, and the other the Codex Ravianus, which is a mere transcript of the text." Ending of Mark 16, verses 9-20 [5]."The passage from verse 9 to the end is not found in the two most ancient manuscripts, the Sinaitic and Vatican, and others have it with partial omissions and variations." The stoning of the Prostitute story. [6] The entire book of Revelation. [7] No two Patristics ever agreed on all 27 books being scripture. [8] Would Jacob call those insiginificant errors? Most definitely not. In fact if God is perfect, and God's revelation is an extension of God's guidance for mankind, should it not reflect the perfect nature of God? This is "God's word" after all. Any variant in God's word would mean Jacob's God is imperfect and would Jacob not be a heretic for disputing that variances don't affect his doctrine when his own God says there can only be one eternal word:"Your word, O LORD, is eternal; it stands firm in the heavens.", see Psalm 119:89. In Jacob's case, it get's worse as he made this claim:"So Ijaz’s myth that no two mss agree 100% is utterly deceptive, he says “only one mss or codex can be true”, this is a huge misconception based on ignorance and desperate skepticism." As it contradicts the aforementioned verse from Psalms 119:89, therefore he has labelled his own God to be deceptive, ignorant, desperate and a skeptic. As for his comments on the Muslim 'oral tradition', they are easily dismissed as it is known Christians abandoned liturgical transmission in light of textual transmission, hence why no such oral tradition as documented for Jews and Muslims is seen in Christian history. The Muslim canon and codex was developed during the time of Muhammad [saws] and completed within his lifetime, by over 30 scribes under the authority of Muhammad [saws], [9]. As already noted the Sanaa Codex differed only in arrangement of the order of Surahs and a variation in the writing of Alif, found only in 3 of 35,000 MSS, which does not affect the text in anyway, as it is comparable in English to writing in 'italics' as opposed to 'normally' [10].His final reproach on the Qur'an is the statement:"He just admits the original (previous) revelations of Allah got “lost”. “The Torah, Zabur and Injil were books given by Allaah to the Jews and Christians, not the books written by the Jews and Christians afterbeing lost”." [11] I pray that Jacob learns to read as my statement of books being lost, refers to the Judaic admittance of 'hiding scripture' or 'losing it', during: AntiOchus' invasion. Nebuchadnezzar's invasion. Josiah Son of Ammon's rule. For which Allaah did send Prophets to remind them of God's message, see Qur'an 2:132, 5:20, 20:24, 51:38, 73:15 and 79:17, for which the Bible says they were killed: " “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you.... Look, your house is left to you desolate." - Matthew 23:37-38.In closing, I have provided ample evidence to counter Jacob's claims. He has been unable to answer the 5 contentions listed at the start of this closing statement and he has not answered any of the counter claims I have presented, nor has he been able to provide an physical of a single 'manuscript', 'codex' or 'canon' of any Bible to be presented as 'authentic' and being God's word. Thus refuting himself. He even sent a message during the debate, begging me not to use certain arguments, look at his dishonesty! Sources: Bible.org: http://bible.org..., cit. #6. Jacob, Round 2. www.thefreedictionary.com/contradiction http://barnes.biblecommenter.com... http://sco.biblecommenter.com... http://bit.ly... http://www.newadvent.org... http://www.ntcanon.org... The History of the Qur'anic Text: From Revelation to Compilation, by MM Azami, preface, pages 15-16. http://bit.ly..., Round 2.