During or after this debate concludes, my opponent ought to read the "Liar Game" manga

Onto my case . . . =========================================================================== OUTLINE: | =========== Congratulations! You are one of the 1 in 100,000 people who have been entered in the amazing LIAR GAME TOURNAMENT! Along with the postcard there are 100 million yen in notes. That's the beginning of the Liar Game. When the game ends, in 30 days, you will have to return your 100 million. If your opponent steals them, he can keep them as a prize, and you will have a debt of 100 million... Nao Kanzaki, an honest college student, receives 100 million yen (about $1,000,000) one day, along with a card saying that she has been chosen to participate in the "Liar Game Tournament". In order to win the game, she is to steal the 100 million yen issued to her sole opponent, and to keep hers safe. Upon finding out to her opponent is her former teacher Kazuo Fujisawa, she misplaces her trust in him and is easily deceived. Knowing that losing the game will put her in debt, a lawyer tells her of Shinichi Akiyama, a genius swindler. Akiyama had just finished a prison term for driving a multi-level marketing corporation into bankruptcy, and at first refuses to help Nao. After seeing her trusting nature, he decides to help on the condition that he receives half her profits. Though she is left in the dark about his plans, in the end he steals not only Nao's 100 million yen back but Fujisawa's as well. After returning the 100 million yen she was first issued by the LGT, Nao has an extra 100 million, while her teacher is in debt. Though she gives 50 million to Akiyama as promised, she gives her own share to Fujisawa so that he can reduce his debt. Seeing this, Akiyama also returns his share. He claims that as he promised to get only half of what Nao earns; if she receives nothing, he receives nothing too. =========================================================================== Above, I have briefly outlined the events of the first round of the Liar Game tournament, but (for obvious reasons) have left out a vast amount of its depth and shall try not to spoil anything concerning the later rounds. The series revolves around Akiyama helping Nao get through this tournament. Throughout each chapter, you'll find yourself gasping in awe at how ingenious the "games" in the tournament have been set up or how clever Akiyama is in realistically overcoming situations which you really see no way out of. Even in the first round, I myself was honestly of the belief that there was no way for the main character to win the first round even up to the very end (in spite of previously having been told that the protagonists are successful), only to be absolutely flabbergasted at how Akiyama managed to believable swindle the money required. As the story continues, the games get more complex, you learn more about both Nao and Akiyama motivations and the series even goes in depth through both a psychological and philosophical perspective. Whether it be why humans lie or what it is to truly "trust" someone, it is certainly rather enlightening and certainly breath of fresh air when in comparison to a lot of the garbage that sadly pollutes this medium of entertainment. What I'm basically getting at is that this series caters to intellectuals (if it doesn't, CON is free to prove me wrong . . . which he can do through digging up information in my source or objecting to any claim which I've made about the series . . . which he'd probably need to source to do anyway. :D ). Seeing as how CON is an intellectual (on the basis that he likes to debate and is intrigued by both complexity and philosophy---which one can reasonably conclude through reading his prior debates and comments on debates in particular, this series would more likely than not prove to be intriguing reading material for him. And that'll do it for now (though I reserve the right to present new arguments should I feel inclined to do so). :D =============== CROSS-EXAMINATION| =============== Question #1: What's the best way for you to counter my position while still being completely honest about your interests? Question #2: How familiar are you with the entertainment from this culture? Question #3: Is money the most important thing in the world? Question #4: Are you the kind of person who easily trust others or are you always skeptical of any particular individual's actions? Quesion #5: In explicit detail, what is the best method of me successfully upholding my position and winning this debate?