Santa Claus is a creepy old man

Note how most of Pro's arguments and rebuttals are one liners. This shows little depth in Pro's reasoning. I would like to contest Pro when he says "I would like to add that the way the argument is set up even if my opponent disproves Santa is creepy in one of my points, he doesn’t win unless he disproves them all." As Pro has affirmed the resolution that Santa is creepy, he is trying to prove that without a doubt Santa is a creepy man. As he is side proposition, he must prove that Santa is creepy in all circumstances. However, as side opposition, if I even provide one case, where the majority of people believe that Santa is not creepy, then he is not a creepy man. Then I have won.Rebuttal:1. No, I believe that you have misunderstood my argument. This line, like all metaphors, should be taken for more than it's literal meaning, as Santa does not literally watch every child when they are sleeping. There has been no evidence of Santa actually sitting outside your window and watching you. Therefore, it is logical to assume that he does not do this. When Santa flies around the world, he actually flies around the world. As this line is taken for it's literal meaning, it is not a metaphor. This has been shown in many movies, which Pro tries to discredit (more on this later), but never has any movie or show shown Santa sitting outside your window and watching you. This leads to the logical conclusion that this line is not literal, but rather metaphorical. Furthermore, Pro does not even attack my rebuttal, as he concedes to me that this line is a metaphor, and not to be taken for it's literal meaning. He does not explain why being "equally impossible for him to fly around the world in a single night if we are looking at normal circumstances", would entitle Santa to be creepy. I have explained that this line is a metaphor, and Pro agrees with me "that may well be", and as a result, Santa is not a creepy man. It is not necessary to provide reasoning as to why this line is a metaphor anymore, as Pro has agreed. Therefore, I win on this point. 2. Yes, that is correct, most people would find breaking and entering to be creepy. However, they find only the act to be creepy, not the burglar themselves. I am sure no one finds Brad Pitt to be creepy, for example. If he were to break into your house, I am sure you would not find him to be annoyingly unpleasant, but rather, you would greet him and welcome him. You may find the fact that he came in through your chimney to be unpleasant, but not Brad Pitt himself. It is the same with Santa. This resolution is "Santa is a creepy man", not "Breaking and Entering is creepy". Therefore, Pro's rebuttal does not make any sense, whatsoever. There is a difference between committing creepy acts and being creepy yourself. I am sure many people play violent video games, but are not violent people themselves. There is little correlation between actions and what type of person you are. Perhaps the simplest reason why Santa goes down the chimney rather than using on the front door, is because it is locked. The reason why he doesn't want to knock may be because he is kind and does not want to wake anyone up. Pro fails to prove why going down your chimney may be creepy. I have proved why it is not creepy. Therefore, I win on this point also.3. Pro suggests that all christmas movies that I have seen are pro-Santa propaganda. I challenge Pro to support his case. I challenge him to show me one movie where elves are not happy to be working for Santa and are slaves. Mind you, you must find a movie where the elves are not being paid, as slaves don't get paid. Furthermore, even if these elves were slaves, Pro does not explain why having slaves working for you makes you a creepy man. I, like almost every teenager in the world, can be considered a slave. I do chores for my parents, and my parents, "own" me in a sense. I often do not get paid for my chores. Are my parents creepy as a result? Does that not mean that almost every parent in the world is creepy? I don't consider my friend's parents to be creepy, and I am sure if you met my parents, they are also not creepy. It is doubtful and hard to believe. As Pro fails to explain his case, I win on this point. 4. Pro makes a feeble attempt at a rebuttal here - it makes no sense. Obviously, the parents don't consider Santa or the act of lap sitting to be creepy, as they allow their kids to sit on his lap. Parents don't let their kids sit on any other stranger's lap because they don't know them, and as parents, it is instinctive to distrust strangers when dealing with kids and have a first impression of creepiness about them. 5. Okay fine, he's neglecting a valuable clientele. But how does that make him creepy? It just shows that he is inept at business, but not creepy. Pro again fails to explain why this would warrant Santa to be creepy. 6. Perhaps he is forced to live by himself in the North Pole. If he lived among society, he would be bombarded everyday with requests of presents. That is why many celebrities choose to live apart from society, to get away from the stress and paparazzi. I am sure that people don't find celebrities to be creepy, even though they live apart from society. Just look at Justin Bieber. He has millions of fans, and he lives apart from society with other celebrities, otherwise he would cause chaos in society. I am sure that none of his fans find him creepy at all. Therefore, I am sure that people don't find Santa to be creepy. Therefore, I win on this point as well. Rebuilding:1. Children's PerspectiveThat accusation is false actually. Children are tought at young ages to be wary of strangers and never follow strangers or take anything from strangers. Therefore, this creates a mentality within the child that strangers are creepy. Obviously, if children were tought to be wary of Ssanta, this would cause a mentality within the child that Santa is creepy. However, they are not. This means that they do not find Santa creepy like pedophiles and strangers. In fact, most children do not even view Santa as a stranger, but rather as a friend. Therefore, Santa is not creepy, but pedophiles still are.Therefore, my argument is still valid.2. Parent's PerspectiveAs I said before, Santa is not viewed as a stranger, but rather a friend. Let me give you this example. There are a lot of religious fanatics in our world. These people have never even met their deity that they worship. However, do they think of him as creepy? No, but rather a protector and a friend.Furthermore, parents let kids talk to Santa in malls and crowded areas, where there are witnesses and cameras. If there was a Santa in a dark alley somewhere, it would be a very different story. Therefore, the setting influences whether or not someone is creepy. As Santa never does dealings in back alleys like some people, he is not creepy like those people. As I said, Santa is viewed more as a friend, not a stranger, therefore, he is not creepy.Conclusion.As my opponent has failed to explain many of his points, and expand on them to give them more depth, he has not truly looked into the fact that Santa is a creepy man. Therefore, as I have provided much more analysis, I believe that I have won this round. I have proven through my two arguments cases where people do not find Santa creepy. I have also refuted each of Pro's arguments as to why Santa is not creepy. At the end of this round, none of Pro's arguments stand and my arguments are still valid and important to the round.Therefore, I have won this debate.Vote Con. Surely no one here thinks Santa is creepy.I am sure he played a big part in your childhood. It's almost Christmas, so be nice to Santa who has given you presents when you were a kid, and vote not creepy. I look forward to more failed arguments by my opponent in the next round. Thanks.