Interactive Drawing Cartoon Contest.

"The idea is that whoever makes the most relevant pictures wins." you say. Relevant: "bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent" based on http://dictionary.reference.com.... But since we both had drawings "connected with the matter in hand", in this case, your scientist, and my scientist and cheese, they were both connected, and thus relevant. It is because my scientist stands a bit far from the cheese that creates the awkwardness and the confusion within his face, only adding upon my drawing's awesomeness. Our drawings are both relevant to drawing "a scientist with cheese", and they are tied on relevancy. Since my drawing is more, creative and has more effort spent into the process of drawing it, I win hands down. (And plus, you didn't bother to even try to state reasons why your drawing is more puzzling than mine. You drop the argument, you concede.)Now, of course, your round two drawing is much better versus my round one drawing. However, you have a tough competitor... (whew! These drawings are getting harder and harder!) Oh, and sorry about my name getting cut off--that was an error. However, you can still tell it's by me. What other user has the name "9spacekin" in them? REASONS WHY THIS DRAWING IS BETTER THAN YOURS1. My scientist is more accomplishedWhile your scientist can build lasers and make cheese 10 times more tasty, my scientist can discover whole new cheese planets and climb massive cheese mountains, AND be the representative of the mouse world to put down his flag.2. My drawing has more stuff than you (and less negative space)Even without the flag, my drawing is still dramatically filled with "cheese holes". You wanted a wedge of cheese? I give you a wedge of cheese. ;) (actually, it's technically 3 wedges of cheese shown, but I doubt drawing more than needed is cheating.)3. my scientist is less awkward than yoursWhile your mouse scientist is grinning weirdly, almost maliciously, as if it's for his own purpose, or some new purpose, my scientist is very clear--standing in an "achievement" position and grinning victoriously from all his hard work. Sure, you can argue that adds a new perspective to your drawing, making it complex, but it's really unclear whether the mouse scientist is doing this for his own good or the general population's good. And plus, I'm pretty sure he's supposed to be good. It's just that you didn't represent that very well, and thus, the "smile" is a bit less relevant to what you were trying to draw.4. my guys are actually standing, your chracters are floatingHow can your drawings be "related" if they are floating in nowhere (or in a vacuum/space)? My scientists are at least standing somewhere, but yours are just floating. That's not very "connected", eh?5. your "flourescent light" wasn't all that flourescent, and thus, not as "relevant" as my dramatic sunrise/sunsetSeriously, it looks very similar to a "radiation symbol", and the laser light is very unnoticeable, and thus can be concluded less relevant than my epic sunrise/sunset upon the planet of cheese. Look at how closely the dramatic "flourescent light" matches radiation. Radiation is a type of light, but it's UV and UV cannot be seen. Because such, it is irrelevant.In conclusion, for the second time in a row, I have proved my drawing to be better, and more relevant, than my opponent's.DRAW:scientist wearing lab coatwedge of cheesea flourescent lighta flag and....*drum roll please*lasagna. MMM-MMM!