Need a help with my debate case.

Ok, so I know this isn't a real debate and I probably shouldn't have taken this. But I did so because it was likely that other good members of the site would have seen it the same way and not accepted. That would mean that the person who did accept would have been a lesser member/troll who wouldn't have been able to help my opponent much. 3 hour debate limit, so my opponent probably won't get back to me in the later rounds cause it'll be 3 in the morning. But you can continue to pm me during the debate or after if you need more help. First off, Speciesism isn't something the aff should be running at all. Speciesism says that some species deserve more rights than others. So basically, humans deserve the most rights, animals deserve less, and insects deserve none. Technically, you can support speciesism and animal rights since animals still have some rights under that system. But in general, the idea behind speciesism is that less intelligent species deserve less rights, which is bad for animals. So you don't want to go for it. Secondly, speciesism isn't a value. The value is supposed to be something vague and undeniably good, like Life, quality of life, Justice, Societal Welfare, etc. I've judged and watched a few debate rounds on this topic, and 90% of them had Justice as their value. You should too because the word itself is in the resolution.Justice has a lot of definitions, but the one most people will go for is the one talking about fairness. The criterion is going to be determined by the arguments you're actually running. So we'll go there first.You'll need 2-3 contentions, but since you're cutting it close just make it 2. You've got to think of 2 reasons why animals should have rights. I'm gonna name the taglines of some common arguments but you'll have to expand on them yourself.1. Animals can feel pain/suffer2. Animals have emotions3. Animals have interests (like, they want to live, not experience pain, mate, etc)4. Discriminating against animals is no different than dicriminating based on race or sex5. Animals are innocent (they generally don't hurt humans unless in self defense)Pick 2 of those arguments (or something else if you can think of it) and make them contentions. You're waiting til the last minute so you won't have the time or motivation to write a complete case. But you need to write at least 2 paragraphs on each point for it to look presentable to the teacher. Formatting will earn you more points, so make sure to bold or underline the value and contention taglines. Itaicize quotations.In the first paragraph you'll need to explain the tagline in detail. For instance, if you say animals can suffer, give a quote from a source saying this is true. A quick google search should give you evidence for it. If you say animals have interests, just point out how their instincts tell them to survive, avoid danger, etc. In the second paragraph, you need to specifically explain why the animal's ability to do X is reason to give them rights. For instance, "Being able to experience suffering is grounds to give them rights because..." Look up some quotes from Peter Singer. He's the end-all-be-all on animal rights. He should have some quotes somewhere on Google talking about the points I brought up.I'll see if you respond and we'll go from there.