the Big Bang is biblically consistent

The Hebrew does not restrict itself to a literal 7 days. Hebrews had no concept of a precise literal 24-hour period. If creation took 24 hours, that would be defined as a day. If it took billions of years, it would also be defined as a day (1). Because of this, no contradiction is found." Wrong. To say Hebrews had no concept of 24hrs or a 7 day week is misleading. Their days consisted of evening to morning. Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. Genesis 1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. As scripture records a day is equal to 1 evening until the next. That sure looks like 24hrs to me. Now lets talk about a 7 day week. How could one observe the Sabbath if they have no concept of a day. How would they find the 7th day? Exodus 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 20:9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 20:10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. Genesis 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. Hmmm, why would God command them to keep the sabbath when he knows they have no concept of "day"? Did not Hebrews keep the sabbath? As you can see, the Hebrews definately had a conept of "day". Not only did they have a concept of "day", they also had the concepts of "months and years". Lets examine scripture. Exodus 12:2 This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: it shall be the first month of the year to you. Notice, the DAYS of Adam totaled 900+ Y EARS? Genesis 5:5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died. Why would they say certain days, within certain months, within a specific year, xyz happen if they had no concept of day? Ezekiel 1:1 Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God. 1:2 In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king Jehoiachin's captivity. Scripture clearly records they had the concept "day" and also the concepts of "months and years". So, Hebrews had the concept, now what? The word "day" is still ambiguous, how do we know which meaning the writer intended? Scripture confirms scripture! If we continue reading Genisis, when we come to the fourth chapter, we encounter a new phrase. Lets read it. Genesis 4:3 And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD., What have we here? Up until this point, all throughout Genesis, a passage of time is referred to specifically as "day". Now we find it as "in the process of time". Couldnt the writer just have used "day" instead? Would it not have been less confusing had he done so? After reading the passage, its easy to see, the writer clearly knew the difference between "day(24hrs)" and "in the process of time(hours,days,years,eons,ages,etc)" its not until AFTER Genesis 4:3, that "days" are referred to as "years,months,etc". One should only conclude that the writer intended it that way. Why? As seen in the verse, the writer makes a clear distinction between "time passing" and "day". As not to confuse the reader. To put the meaning of "time passing" onto "day" before this verse is an error. To do so, one would have to explain why Genesis does not say " And "in the process of time" God ended his work which he had made; and he rested "in the process of time" from all his work which he had made.? I ask you why not? "The Big bang was simply to begin this present earth and heaven (Gen. 1). Of course the new heaven and new earth will probably not occur in the same way this universe did. Either way, this does not contradict the fact that the big bang happened in THIS universe." Big Bang a fact? Prove it!!! I know you cant, its a "theory". One you have faith in! Yet this same "theory" was started to DISCREDIT Genesis. The fact is, this "theory" changes over time, God's word doesnt. That is indeed the Biggest contradiction to the Bible! How is something, that always changes consistent with something that never changes?