the Belgian UFO Wave is best Explained as Aliens

The Youtube videos simply highlight the fact that the Belgian UFO Air Wave doesn't stand alone. Since Con asked for specifics, not being able to reply to every piece of information in all those videos, I will oblige him. Take for example in Belgian UFO Air Wave itself, which was in the last video and to which he made no reply. (Belgian F-16s and military radar hunting UFOs - Sightings Belgium 1990) http://wzus1.search-results.com...... Chief of the Belgian Air Force comes live in a news report and says that the speeds these things were travelling at would kill any human being. That rules out man-made planes, choppers, and so forth. Notice what Wikipedia says about the altitudes and speeds: "Over the next hour the two scrambled F-16s attempted nine separate interceptions of the targets. On three occasions they managed to obtain a radar lock for a few seconds but each time the targets changed position and speed so rapidly that the lock was broken. During the first radar lock, the target accelerated from 240 km/h to over 1,770 km/h while changing altitude from 2,700 m to 1,500 m, then up to 3,350 m before descending to almost ground level – the first descent of more than 900 m taking less than two seconds. Similar manoeuvres were observed during both subsequent radar locks. On no occasion were the F-16 pilots able to make visual contact with the targets and at no point, despite the speeds involved, was there any indication of a sonic boom. Moreover, narrator Robert Stack added in an episode of Unsolved Mysteries, the sudden changes in acceleration and deceleration would have been fatal to one or more human pilots. During this time, ground witnesses broadly corroborate the information obtained by radar." http://wzus1.search-results.com... Now, all of the things Con has suggested as what these things were is squarely refuted without exception. In the clip, Chief of the Belgian Air Staff says they thought at first it might be weather phenomenon such as atmospheric or magnetic interference, but visual confirmation on the ground of what their radars were picking up showed those possibilities to be false. I will address all of Con's suggestions one by one: "Light beams operated by human hand" Light beams operated by human hand such as flash lights travel in straight lines. They don't move up and down the way these things accelerated. Also, radars don't pick up simple beams of light. The source of such light, i.e. a flash light, could not move at such speeds. "insects, birds" Can't travel at such speeds as to break a radar lock "fish" Now Con is being ridiculous; a fish in the sky? Is he taking this debate seriously? "a leaf caught in the wind." Is Con serious? On radar? A leaf in wind on radar? Moving at 1, 170 km/h? Con is taking thing out of context here and wildly suggesting anything at all no matter how silly it is. Silly way to win a debate! I'm regretting that he was the one who accepted the challenge; I'm sure other people out there might have been more serious about it. "Lots of things are more manoeuvrable than several tons of jet fuelled metal." There is a combination of things these UFO's did, a combination that fits nothing we know of from this earth. "Rockets" Rockets are piloted by humans but no human could have survived the speeds these things went at; and there is no launch site in Belgium anyway. You seem not to trust Youtube, so tell us plainly if you think the whole interview with the Chief of Belgian Air Staff is a fake; if not, then its good evidence. "meteors" Those go strait down; these UFO's went both down and up. Does a meteor go "up"? In fact, meteors don't stop before they hit the ground, these UFO's did. "lightning" Lightning goes straight down to the ground or straight up to the sky; it doesn't go a certain distance in the air then stop, then go another direction then stop, as these UFO's did. "light beams, lasers" See above, such things fall into the same category as "beam of light" and lightning" all of which are refuted. Con claims there must be a natural explanation but he can't find it cause there is none! This UFO occurrence is best explained as aliens. "Daley's professed opinions regarding evolution clearly demonstrate that he doesn't have much faith in the ability of scientists to accurately assess the workings of nature. It is therefore contradictory for him to claim that things science can't explain are automatically other-worldly." How is this a contradiction? The answer for the design in nature "is" other-worldly, God! The answer for the UFO's in Belgium is other-worldly too, aliens. On one off tangent point, let me just say that abiogenesis is the evolution of life from non-living inorganic material; abiogenesis is merely the beginning stage of evolution but is evolution non-the-less; hence, the term, "the evolution of life." Maybe Con hasn't heard it. As for his theological argument, one can easily imagine aliens carrying out tests and gathering data about our atmosphere while avoiding being shot down by our planes; it is difficult to imagine the all-wise, omniscient God having nothing better to do than fly around the Belgium skies at night! If Con chooses to continue believing it might have been God up in the sky that night that is his concern, but I will leave it up to the voters to decide what they think! The atheists for sure won't think so. I wonder what other Christians will think? That's up to them.