Atheism (pro) vs Theism (con)

Before I'll begin I would like to point out that my intention is not to 100% prove to you that God does not exist but instead to show that the existence of God is implausible and that atheism is more rational. 1)The first argument I would like to talk about is the geographical argument. If you look around the world you see thousands of religions each one with its own God, own scripture, own rituals etc. Your place of birth predetermines your belief. If you're born in Sweden you're most likely gonna be an atheist, if you're born in U. S. A. you're most likely gonna be a Christian, if you're born in Middle East you're most likely gonna be Muslim, if you're born in Israel you're most likely gonna be a Jew. The problem is, is that the indoctrination doesn't mean that your religion is the right one out of those other thousands. Just because everyone in your family believes it doesn't make it true. It only shows that we are more likely to believe what we were brought up to believe, despite the lack of evidence. There are thousands of religions all around the world. This is not the scenario you'd expect if God was real. If God was real and he revealed himself you'd expect there to be a universal religion, instead of thousands of contradictory religions. Imagine Usain Bolt racing a bunch of 5 year olds. He would stand out from the group. He would be much faster compared to 5 year olds. It is the same case with religion. If there was any one religion that is correct it would stand out from other religions. But this is not the case we see in our everyday life. Muslims disagree with Christianity, Buddhists disagree with Jews, Hindus disagree with Muslims etc. This means that all religions are equal. They're either all right or all wrong. They can't all be right as a lot of them contradict each other. Therefore all religions are false. 2) The second argument I would like to talk about is the God of the gaps argument. Have you ever asked yourself. "What caused the big bang? " "Where does life come from? " "What is consciousness? " Currently science can't answer these questions. Therefore we can assume that God is behind these. However throughout history this was proven inconsistent. "How do birds fly? " "Why does the Sun shine? " "Why do leaves change colour throughout the year? " I don't know any of those things. Therefore God must have did it. This was the reasoning of people at the time of Jesus. There is a gap between science and religion. However every time new scientific discoveries are made there is less and less space for God. Science now understands how birds fly, why the sun shines and why the leaves change colour during the year. Please take a look at God of the gaps argument used in the following clip by Bill O'Reilly to justify the existence of God. . https://youtu.be... Bill O'Reilly assumes that the fact that we don't know how the moon got there somehow means that God did it. This already assumes that no physical explanation exists. However history teaches us that there should be a natural explanation for everything. We need to give science more time. 3) Where does God come from. A theist would often tell us that the universe must have a creator. Then what created God. If something can't come from nothing where does God come from. Theists apply these rules to the universe but for some reason want us to believe that God is this special guy who doesn't need to be created, who doesn't need to come from nothing. 4) The forth argument is a short argument which refutes that a timeless spaceless God exists. If God is timeless does he exist? If no time passes for him then is it reasonable to say that he can't exist for 0 seconds? 5) Theists would like you to believe that we were created in his image. Let's test this. Take a look at the human body. -The ratio between microorganisms and cells inside our bodies is 10:1. If we were created in God's image does that mean that there is bacteria inside God. If not then why put all the harmful bacteria inside us. -If we are created in the image of God does that mean he has genitals? If yes why does he need them? -We only have one set of adult teeth. -We breathe and eat through the same tube. This increases our chances of chocking. -We have a blind spot inside our eye. -We have a 120" field of vision. Does an all seeing God only have a 120" field of vision? Does that count as being all seeing? -Why is a woman's birth canal so small? This increases a woman's chance of dying during birth. -Our senses become less sharp as we grow older. -Why are our testicles exposed? Isn't it safer to keep them inside our body. -Why did God put our genitals so close to our rectums. This is such an unhygienic solution. -Our wrists are very fragile. These are some of the flaws in our body. To me this does not look like we were created by an intelligent being in his image. It seems to me that he was created by us in our image. 6)The last reason why we should not believe in God is because there is no scientific evidence to suggest he exists. Furthermore the theistic God violates all the laws of nature. Unlike religion, science is a method of explaining the world through observations and experimentation. Religion is driven by faith and personal feeling. Science is universal no matter where you go. Religion varies from person to person. The only way that I would believe in God is if God was testable, if you could make calculations based on God. Until that happens I will consider God a product of our imagination. Thank you for your attention.