Creationism VS Evolution

http://www.pbs.org... I went online to find an evidence to back up my statement about the stars. I'm sure Nova should be enough as a reliable source. Also energy that made the energy of the universe seems more reasonable then a conscious being. And I have gave you modern examples, and obvious conclusions, that has been backed up. As for the Oxytocin hormone that plays a role in describing one part of our morality here, http://www.youramazingbrain.org... use this as evidence to how we came to love. Oh and as for theory in scientific definition, it is indeed a bright observation that has been backed up with several evidence that does not lead to a conclusion, but can be expanded with more knowledge from advance observation. Ice cubes melt (fact). (Theory) The hotter the climate is, the faster water molecules will move around until it becomes a liquid form, and if boiled hot, the water molecules will move at a much faster rate, turning into a Gas. The reason why this is a theory well because there can be more to this, and scientist has added on more to this. If there was a rank in fact vs theory, theory would be the monarchy. Just to say that you have never given me evidence yet say that scientist have nothing to show, even though it's more then the bible. And therefore what I say is kinda an opinionated faulty. In honesty its not my opinion like I said in the last round. And yes there is more evidence than you think in science. I don't use faith to believe in evolution, I use logic. I don't believe in creationism, because I don't use faith, that is the difference. A religious guy can say, I have evidence, its right here in the bible. Prove that fact in the bible with observation and evidence, instead of saying you can feel that it's the truth. Because you can feel the holy spirit doesn't mean its real. And this is not the same as oh I feel hungry I want to eat, and If I eat all this food, then therefore I knew it was real, cause I felt hungry, and consumed a plate. Morality- well I don't want my family to get hurt, and I'm sure they don't want there family to get hurt. It's a matter of sympathy that gives us these major moralities. And if there is no time in heaven, then how does God give out days. Numbers and the calendar is only man made, just as much as religion. The bible has zero evidence, as science gives us more observations, that we can see, and appears more logical. And these logical observations can be explained to people that question things. And all mystery is solvable over a period of time and study. All animals give off language, in different ways. We have advance vocal chords, so therefore we use sounds, and if you leave two humans on there own with no language, they will eventually invent a way to communicate like pointing at things as the most basic. Animals that are not as evolved use body language, compared to monkeys, and birds. In actual history, civilizations wrote down images that brought out the representation of the specific sound to make trading more efficient. Inca Kingdom used strings knots as a history recorder. I don't know how that worked. But it was there form of writing. Not God getting mad at three men, so he makes them all speak different languages. Then what about the other people, did god change there language so they can spread the language. Thousand of languages exist. And this kind of thought is illogical compared to scientific, and historic observations. Sure we have stated different theories in evolution, but eventually they all lead to one agreement. And if more ideas come out, eventually it will lead to a conclusive theory, like it has been happening several times already. There will always be a conclusion that will shut the other thinkers down. And so far scientist has been agreeing on the conclusion of prime mates, humans, and how living organisms were made.