If God does exist, he is evil. (Abrahamic god)

Okay. So, what you are saying about miracles, is that God performed them in pre and slightly post-biblical days but not today? Fine, if they're hearsay, it's possible that they are false. So then God possibly never performed miracles: -10 miraculous points. Furthermore, if God is "unknowable", as you say, than it makes no sense to believe in him. Believing in something that you don't know exists, have no evidence of, and don't know anything about period is pointless and foolish. The mother's freewill is affected because her will is to break free, but she can't. The rapist is stopping her freewill. No, a regular person bystander has nothing to do with your freewill, the rapist's or murderer's freewill, or even the situation at all because they are limited by their humanity, but a O,O,O,O god bystander would. So, do you refute the statements that God is these things: omnipotent, omnipresent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient? If so, he is useless, and if you don't believe these things about God then my argument is meaningless. If you believe God is just a lazy man in the sky who really doesn't care either way about jack squat, then he is just that, but many theologians would refute that view of God, and the O,O,O,Os are values and traditions passed on from the early church, although not in the Islamic faith, so my argument is a bit more Christian view-attacking. "But to take away someone's free will is evil." You're right. It's immoral, but either way it's immoral, whether he takes away the freewill and helps the mother and son, or doesn't do anything and allows the evil. At least if he interferes the innocent won't be harmed. "1. Like spanking a child for doing something wrong, something tells me they'd figure it out." You're assuming. This isn't true at all. It does not teach them WHY it's wrong, it only teaches them that if they do it again, they can expect to get a beating for it. Again, this showcases God's "you bad. you burn" primitive, barbaric mindset. This shows that God doesn't think things through, and that he goes off of pure emotion and hatred for the criminals instead of showing that he is a wise being, possibly the wisest being in existence. This also shows that God really can't forgive, another example being that if God could forgive, he wouldn't have to sacrifice a magician in a remote part of the Middle East 2,000 years ago (assuming that that actually took place). '"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life."'What about those who don't believe in God? They will perish then, right? They can commit the same actions as a theist, yet perish because they didn't buy into the idea of something that is illogical to start with (but that's another argument for another day). That is profoundly immoral, so that is evil. Those who do the same things should get the same punishment. "If you know, for a fact, God could intervene. You don't; nobody knows that." So than it is possible that God is just a useless, lazy being, unworthy of worship. "there is nothing to suggest that God has a "plan", intervenes in free will, or requires "the deaths of innocent people"'- Here are some Bible verses that constantly refer to God's plan: Jeremiah 29:11, Ephesians 2:10, Jeremiah 1:5, John 3:16 (the exact quote you gave me earlier about 'for god so loved the world' is a plan). Need more verses? - Yet again, miracles suggest he intervenes in freewill, whether they actually happened or not, they still suggest it. - So there are some things outside of his plan that he doesn't want to happen? What use is he? He's not great and powerful as suggested by every holy book ever written about him and what is said by almost every believer. "He also allows excessive, beautiful good." But you just said earlier that you don't know if God in fact could intervene, meaning that excessive good isn't a result of God if he can't intervene. And excessive evil wouldn't be either, if you truly believe that he can't intervene. So, can he? You are a theist, right? Tell me if he can or cannot."He's not allowing it, He's letting us have our own free will." So then he indirectly allows it because he allows us to have freewill in the first place. In your eyes, then, God is just a useless, lazy being in the sky who couldn't care less about what he creates? If you don't believe he intervenes in human lives and interacts with humans, what makes you believe he created them (assuming you're a theist)? My statement that God is evil is only applicable if the beliefs that God is Omniscient, Omnipotent, Omnibenevolent, and Omnipresent are accepted. However, it can be argued that if these are true then he is also good. This means that he is bipolar. Is he then confused on what to do or how to run a good and prosperous universe? Is he a being with a good and bad side? If he is two-faced, then he is untrustworthy. That's where I think this argument is headed. I look forward to your response. Sources: http://www.openbible.info...The Holy Bible: http://www.biblegateway.com...