Abraham Lincoln was a better president than Jefferson Davis

I would like to voting issue to be justified based upon our arguments. Please leave any bias and other known information outside of the debate content. Reason: it will not result in giving a side more advantage before this debate is read. Thank you. Summary: My opponent only claims that Davis only defied public opinion. Lincoln had defied both public opinion and the public itself in forms of riots and violating many rights. Clearly Lincoln had more opposition and wasn't a better president. The loss of the Confederacy wasn't just Davis, but on many leaders. Lincoln didn't re-unite the Union, Congress did during the Reconstruction era. This argument should be dropped. Lincoln wasn't intelligent, calm, resourceful, and cautious. I have proven these in my rebuttals. He also caused riots and many Union deaths. No one can be calm in dealing with this. I have proven that Lincoln was a worse president than Davis. Davis supported rights and Lincoln defied and suspended rights. Lincoln also violated the Constitution's amendments 1,5,6 and the President's oath. Lincoln suspended state and individual rights for his own personal gain. Lincoln wasn't resourceful, cautious, or intelligent as Davis. My opponent describes Lincoln's cautions and resourcefulness is sending many Union soldiers to their deaths. If Abe was cautious than he wouldn't had appointed Generals Burnside, McCellan, and Pope to send Union soldiers to their death. We all know President Davis first appointed the best generals in the South and under their command the South had fewer death than the Union. Davis is indirectly resourceful by appointing great generals that conserved the very limited manpower the south had. Now that's resourceful! Through Davis' intelligence and background he made original ideas to run the war. Later in the war Lincoln stole them. My opponent even agrees with this point: "He had to come up with completely new strategies,especially because he was in charge of a rebellious nation, the Confederate States of America." Thus his points on Lincoln's intelligence falls. Davis' intelligence had more orignal ideas and used them. I urge you to accept my point. My opponent describes that Lincoln drove the U.S into a deeper debt by using credit(that he did not repay). Again he wasn't resourceful. I explained that Davis used greenbacks and taxes to run the war. Davis had a better political and military background was much more prepared for war than Lincoln. This led up to: Lincoln's first years in office proved to be a disaster he appointed the wrong generals to fight, had to deal with riots, etc. Davis had a steady first years in office. Lincoln didn't truly care about slaves because: 1. his E.P only freed slaves in the Confederacy not in Union controlled areas such as the border states. 2. If he was intelligent and cared about slaves than his amendment 13 wouldn't have many loopholes. 3. Border states. Davis truly believed in the Confederacy cause while Lincoln was on the border for of which side to fight for, antislavery or re-unitng Union. In his inaugural address and staying with the Confederacy until its end Jefferson was loyal to his cause. My opponent also quoted,"but they HAD strong goals and NEITHER SIDE was WILLING to COMPENSATE." Meaning Davis was loyal. He also states:"the South overreacted-they felt Lincoln was going to abolish slavery in their territory and lifestyle-WHICH HE DID NOT PLAN ON." This last one was from 2nd part, point 6, 2nd line. It clearly contradicts with what his rebuttal says about Lincoln supporting slavery and supports my argument. Lincoln didn't re-unite the Union that my opponent claims. Congress did using their Reconstruction plan. Therefore you must drop this argument. My opponent forfeited and was on spring break. He had three days to post yet hasn't provided any further refutals to my rebuttals. Therefore my round 1 and 2 all stand. Voting issues: 1. My opponent's rebuttal is contradictory with his round 1 case in many ways, I have proven this. Several arguments either contradicts with each other or supports my arguments. 2. I destroyed his case and rebuttals. He has no other arguments standing after round 2. My case still stands. 3. My opponent's credibility on Lincoln was obliterated. And he has no credible source to support his arguments. My sources were bibliographies and others were stated in my case. In conclusion my opponent had 3 days, forfeited,and was on spring break. He has not refuted any of my rebuttals. Therefore they all stand. I have proven that Davis was a better president than Lincoln and I urge voting for Con. Thank you reading for this debate. If you have any comments and adv ice please message me. And please message me your reasons for your vote. Thank you.