The god of the bible does not exist

Scientific Evidence When you state that "you believe", That"s the same exact thing as "you are guessing" which means I really should not read any further and automatically trash anything you have to say. You fully get that - right? But let"s see what you got considering that you must think you are smarter than Neil De Gras Tyson, Stephen Hawking etc as they have not been able in any way shape or form to scientifically god. Btw, Which god? "As you"ve lost 65 of your previous debates"" Wanna know why? Take one lucky guess whippersnapper, Go on take one lucky guess. Go on. Since you think you are so smart, Obviously arrogant as well, And ignorant also. Know who dsjpk5 is? Nothing more be said. Text is the worst form of communication possible "This is quite ironic considering that we"re currently using text to communicate"" I really should end the debate right now with such a completely hypnotic stupid statement like that one especially considering the absolute fact that you didn"t even watch the video to prove how fraudulent and fake your bible truly is, Thus proving that your god is as well. Now go back and study up as to what was previously stated and put some cotton candy in your brain rather than cabbage. Btw, Where's your reference(s)? 1 Timothy 2:5 "I think you"ve misunderstood what a mediator is. " I didn"t misunderstand anything. "one who intervenes between two, " EXACTLY youngun. You just lost your case for yah. Wow. "The god of the bible most certainly does not exist according to your bible. " Taking things out of context are we? It goes in conjunction perfectly with the spearheaded 1 Timothy 2:5. This is just simply too easy. "Do you know what a tautology is? The God of the Bible must, By very definition, Be same thing as the God according to the Bible. " Oh you mean like thou shalt not kill but its ok for you to kill anyway because your god kills and he orders you to do it anyway? Oh I get it. Nah. Because once again your god, Because of what you presented as an example, To bring in CONFUSION that YOU think you know best, Especially above everybody else, Would never use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible. "The god of the bible must". Strange isn"t it that you nor anyone can prove that this god of yours even exists. So where does this "must" come from? And backtracking to "god"? Who is this "us" and "our"? "Personally I think"" More guesswork. "it"s referring to the trinity. " Well the trinity is trash. How can there be any fricken truth to it considering the FACT that genesis was written at a completely different time from the NT so by that merit alone they have 0% of nothing to do with each other. Duh. There's no proof "What counts as proof? " Well garsh there. That"s like thinking that Daffy Duck is a god. Wow. Are you this ignorant to ask THAT question? "In a court of law it means convincing a jury, " Well you do realize that no creationist will ---ever--- put your god on trial again. Take two lucky guesses why? Do you even know? Or did you just toss that one out because you really are completely inept? "Beyond reasonable doubt, That the defendant is guilty. In mathematics it means following some precise notation to layout a valid theorem. " And guess what? Your god has none of that. Take one lucky guess why? In the context of this debate, Surely proof must be judged against the set of rules you yourself have laid out. In your previous post you state that "I did accept your bible as evidence"; if that"s the case then the Bible verse I gave fulfils your criteria. " 100% wrong. Take one lucky guess why? OK I"ll give you the answer to that question. But the others, Yeah, You"ll have to guess at them. Hopefully, And that is if and only if you are intelligent and educated, You"ll get them right. OK the answer is so simple" its a verse. Big whoop. Who in their right mind would ever assume that its a correct verse? And the verse proves WHAT exactly other than a few meaningless tribal words? You have a long long long windy road of the big bang as compared to an atom to climb. "Normally an atheist is entitled to reject faith-based arguments, " Oh we haven"t even touched on faith, Even though obviously it is part of the answers, Though not completely. A hint: don"t get too far ahead of yourself otherwise you"ll bury yourself in a tapdance of some concrete parachuting classes. Just a fair warning. Time for my nap.