The war on libya was no means of protcting civilians!

First Off, I would like to inform voters that the Con is very heavily biased against Europe, NATO, and facts since his only actual source he used is the same online newspaper that has had these headlines,"Socialism needed to save humanity"http://www.cpgb-ml.org..."British workers must refuse to have anything to do with the criminal war that is being planned against the sovereign nation of Iran"http://www.cpgb-ml.org..."Time to face it: capitalism must go!"http://www.cpgb-ml.org...Here's one calling Kim Jung Il of North Korea a HERO"Comrade Kim Jong Il devoted his entire life to the freedom and happiness of the Korean people"http://www.cpgb-ml.org...Here's one I find a little concerning regarding why the Pro really is against NATO involved in Libya. Its not because they are accidentally killing civilians, it may be because the same extremist biased website The Pro is sourcing has advocated victory for Gaddafihttp://www.cpgb-ml.org...Point is, the Pro is pretty biased in his views and arguments and that should be taken into consideration. His source is also very poor since it claims over 6,000 civilians died from NATO bombings when total civilian deaths are just over 1000Now for the actual arguments. The source the Pro uses comes from the same extremist, misinformed, and poorly written website that claims other things such as Kim Jung Il is a hero, the sanctions against Iran is unjust, that capitalism must go, etc. So this source should not be taken seriously since it comes from a very biased and unreliable website. Now that thats out of the way allow me to justify intervention in Libya by NATO. In Tunisia back in December of 2010, a single man immolated himself (lit himself on fire as a form of suicide) as protest to Tunisia's harsh government treatment of its own people. The suicide spurred a great deal of unrest as people protested the mans treatment by the government and then quickly sarted protesting the government's inefficiency, poor results, lack of civil rights or political freedoms, etc etc and the people began protesting for massive reform or for a new government. This revolution was quite successful and the long time dictator of Tunisia was forced into exile while Tunisia transitioned into a Constitutional Republic. The Success in Tunisia sparked protests in many other countries, the largest and most important one being in Egypt. Egypt like Tunisia was run y a long time dictator who suppressed the rights of the people and severely limited political freedoms, most notable the freedom of the press. Soon enough people began protesting the government and its long history of cruelty and that too ended in the successful dethronement of a dictator and called for the creation of a new government, while the military controlled the matters as the country transitioned. This is where Libya comes into play. They are now bordering countries to the East and the West that have witnessed massive peaceful protests that have yielded very satisfactory results in terms of massive government reform. The people of Libya realized this and sure enough they began protesting against Gaddafi's rule, citing long time abuse from his regime and demanding reform. What separates Libya from Tunisia and Egypt though is that Gaddafi was hell-bent on remaining in power and would put to death thousands of his own people if thats what it would take. Skip forward to the fighting. Libyan rebels hold much of the east side of the country next to Egypt, and Gaddafi is using extensive military force to try to exterminate all of them. This came after many known events where Gaddafi authorized the use of extreme force against peaceful protesters and a long history of oppressing his own people. So these were the actions NATO took regarding Libya and the reasons behind them.1 - Froze the bank accounts of Libyan warlords and leaders to prevent thse funds form being used to purchase weaponry to then be used against protesters or rebels2 - Enforced a No-fly zone to prevent Gadaffi from using aircraft or helicopters or any aerial means from ruthlessly killing rebels or civilians3 - Coordinated with rebels through drone warfare to target and eliminate Pro-Gaddafi forces after the rebels proved they could indeed wage war against Gaddafi. The use of drones is single handedly the greatest contribution made in warfare designed to maximize results while inflicting as little harm on civilian populations as possible. 4 - Provided funding to the rebels to allow them to continue their struggle against Gaddafi's forces to fight for freedom5 - Refrained from deploying ground units to prevent endangering troops and civilians6 - Encouraging the UN to impose economic sanctions on Libya to protest the killing of civiilansAs for the Pros statements," from the so called 'dictator' colonal Gaddaffi" Gaddafi was indeed the dictator of Libya, And he had been for well voer 40 years"The rebals are mainly made up of Islamic extremist linking to Al quida" Tht my friend is absolute bullsh*t and there is absolutely no evidence suggesting this is true"This sums up the ridicualaty of wars today, commited by the brutal NATO and its nations" - That is completely your opinion. So to conclude my argument, the war in Libya was entirely justified and NATO has continually acted in the best interests of the Libyan rebels and civilians who were oppressed and executed under the regime of Gaddafi. http://www.bbc.co.uk...http://abcnews.go.com...http://www.bloomberg.com...http://www.turkishnews.com...http://www.wired.com...http://www.aljazeera.com...http://www.bbc.co.uk...http://www.foxnews.com...http://www.skuld.com...