Call of duty Modern Warfare 3 is better than Battle field 3 as far as sales, campign, etc

"1. Vehicles- not everyone lives to play vehicles yes it adds sense of realism but at the same time people it a video game and you keep arguing about realism. I understand having realism but it is not the number 1 concern. 2. Multiplayer its obvious MW3 has decreased camping and the spawn system helps stop it to. Camping is 50% issue 50% helpful. It can be annoying but it helps players learn from over rushing. 3. My opponent didnt acknowledge that the graphics affect game play in a negative way in Bf3. 4. Its not that im not responding to his arguments its that i do and he rebuttles with realism which is really the only thing he has used. 5. Again no argument about survival and spec ops and offline multiplayer that allow families who can afford live to play and have almost endless choices. *Key factor 6. Graphics are not always the most important to a game which my opponent fails to realize a game dosent have to have the best graphics to be on top, Yes it would help but it dosent. An example is The Halo series not the best graphics still very popular. 7. "Xbox players pay for Live to pay online, however, because BF3's main platform is on PC, there is no live charge and this is a huge factor that MUST be looked at in the debate. " Yes but also xbox is the biggest online community. " I will address all my opponents main and final points from the last rebuttal, and by doing so, show why BF3 is a superior game towards MW3. 1. "I understand realism but its not a main concern. " My opponent makes this statement, yet this is a factor to determine whether or not a game is superior. That is also one of the main argument to my case. He simply says "it's not important," and even concedes BF3's realism out matches MW3. To support this, I restate a statement from my opponent. "The thing i like is yea its unrealistic to have health regeneration. " He says its not a concern and yet argues. I have won the debate over which game is more "real" and this factor must flow to my side of the round. 2. "Multiplayer its obvious MW3 has decreased camping and the spawn system helps stop it to. Camping is 50% issue 50% helpful. It can be annoying but it helps players learn from over rushing. " My opponent is talking about camping in maps and its something that can't be solved. However, in BF3, the strategic options for dealing with a opponent are numerous and thus offer a more dynamic multiplayer. My opponent once again provides no source for this from a reliable, up to date source. You can see this if you run through all his posted arguments. 3. "My opponent didnt acknowledge that the graphics affect game play in a negative way in Bf3. " Again, this goes back to realism. Sometimes in a real fight there WILL BE dust clouds, and buildings exploding, and that is a realistic factor. The map changes based on the fight and this is something that offers a dynamic multiplayer and major realism. 4. Its not that im not responding to his arguments its that i do and he rebuttles with realism which is really the only thing he has used. I have addressed the "lone wolf / teamwork" issue, vehicles issue, customization issue, etc. This is completely ignoring all my previous arguments. If you read my previous rebuttals, there was more to just "realism" which he fails to understand. 5. Again no argument about survival and spec ops and offline multiplayer that allow families who can afford live to play and have almost endless choices. *Key factor I clearly said their were lan options for BF3 on the PC (offline multiplayer for parties, family, etc. ), and because BF3's main platform is the PC, there is no live fee to pay for. More then one game type exist for BF3 and that was my argument over the survival / spec ops issue, and also including COOP as well. 6. Graphics are not always the most important to a game which my opponent fails to realize a game dosent have to have the best graphics to be on top, Yes it would help but it dosent. An example is The Halo series not the best graphics still very popular. My opponent is making a subjective argument stating what is important and what isn't. Some people play games for the graphics, others do not. I have won the debate over realism and my opponent attempts to wiggle out of this with that statement above. 7. "Xbox players pay for Live to pay online, however, because BF3's main platform is on PC, there is no live charge and this is a huge factor that MUST be looked at in the debate. " Yes but also xbox is the biggest online community. His statement is completely new argument, and provides no source stating xbox is the biggest online community. However, I will continue to rebut this argument. [1] Xbox tops around 30 million Xbox Live Users in January world wide. [2] However, according to GamingBolt, the Steam Platform has hit over 35 million active accounts in a September 18th article. I provide sources to back this up. Key Voting Issues 1. I won the debate over realism, my opponent concedes to this. 2. My opponent says, in a easy to understand way, "More people play xbox, it must be better. " Once again, this is not true and I successfully rebut this. I provide an analogy as well in my very first rebuttal. "The movie Dark Knight was viewed by thousands of more people then the movie, Hurt Locker. However, Hurt Locker received better ratings, achieved "Best Film" award. The Hurt Locker was an under-viewed movie, but in the end was much better. Although BF3 is not as played by as many people unlike MW3, BF3 still contains certain factors which makes it the better video game. " 3. Multiplayer is more dynamic. 4. No fee for playing online (Remember, BF3's main platform is PC, which my opponent doesn't seem to understand. ) 5. I provide sources, reliable as well, to back up all my claims. My opponent fails to provide RELIABLE and UP-TO-DATE sources from RELIABLE authors / companies, and this must be looked at heavily in this debate BECAUSE many of his arguments are based off of these. 6. My opponent tries to make me look like I contradict myself in his opening rebuttal, however, I clearly do not and if you read you would realize this as well. I have rebutted all my opponents arguments, and have provided 6 key voting issues along with this debate. Review the arguments and my claims accordingly and fairly, along with my opponent. If you have read this far, I thank you greatly for your time to review this debate as well.