War Scenario: United States vs Any Country

Here PRO must feel he has been out-maneuvered. And instead of wisely trying to take steps to reconcile the spiraling political and security necessities that have made the rejoining of the British commonwealth possible; he cries foul."No allies (NATO, UN, Muslim Brotherhood etc.) under ANY circumstances. Unfortunately my move is allowed and does NOT meet the definition of an alliance.Please tell me for instance, what countries is the United Kingdom allied too??? Upon rejoining with the UK, the common wealth partners in effect became the United Kingdom, whereas their prior state names ceases to exist as their governments are transferred back to London. Much in the same way as the Republic of Texas ceased to exist as a state upon joining the United States.Direct military interference is not allowed.Whereas no other country is militarily interfering. When Canada and India deploy forces against the US it is because they are now British-Canada and British-India - aka the United Kingdom.The only diplomatic and military agreements allowed Which is exactly what this is. A diplomatic agreement to rejoin the UK and become ONE NATION.Supplying personnel is NOT ALLOWED, because then it is an alliance. Nope. Because according to foreign policy definitions, an alliance is a pact or an agreement made between two or more different countries (http://en.wikipedia.org...). So again, who represents the second country in this scenario if all common wealth countries in effect became the UK?SUCH alliances are not allowed under ANY circumstances.Again, its not an alliance. Countries like Canada, Australia, and India no longer can claim state soverighty upon joining with the London government. The UK is still allied with no one."THE UNITED STATES ATTACKS THE UNITED KINGDOM WITH AN UNSPECIFIED PROVOCATION. (Not mentioned, nor relevant)" This clearly states there was a provocation. The only realistic reason the US will attack the UK is a serious provocation. UN has declared neutrality in this conflict. Yes, there will be a global economic crisis. Is still not good enough to justify the surreal and violent tendencies the US has taken to prosecuting this war and upsetting the global order. Including ignoring the lack of a UN mandate, attacking a member of NATO, sending the global economy into galactic freefall, encouraging Russian and Chinese aggression against Europe and tiny Pacific nations, deploying occupying ground forces and massive amounts of ordnance against Great Britain, and having a military presence in nearly every art of the world. PRO therefore, has none nothing to defeat the impression in the eyes of the world (not US) that he is a diabolical imperialist nation hell bent on conquest.While lacking the ability to form military alliances themselves, smaller countries therefore, must find a viable alternative strategy to protect themselves from the global security nightmare that is threatening to swallow them up. My moves -creating larger countries- makes sense and is allowed under the rules. PRO just feels cheated because he has once more been outmaneuvered. RULE 5: "No allies (NATO, UN, Muslim Brotherhood etc.) under ANY circumstances. You CAN have military or diplomatic agreements and/or treaties with other nations. Religion is not a factor." In my move, every agreeing participant in effect became the UK. Therefore. the UK still does NOT have any allies.