Theism is more rational than Atheism.

"Technically, you're last two arguments state that there is possibility that god exists, which is useless because there must also be a possibility that the big bang happened and etc. Unless you apply Pascal's Wager, these arguments are useless and therefore irrelevant." Yes, Pascal's Wager is a very.. Hm.. You're right. Guess it is my main argument, made a bit of a mistake. Oh well, No use it trying to claim otherwise. "It is very true that our natural biological process naturally see cause and effect and would deny anything without a beginning. Right there you have just in a way disproved your own second point. But as I have stated before," But then again, I said that if this point was incorrect, #3 would have to be the correct one. "Using the same logic I have used before, I would like to remind you that through the infinite amount of gods, there is an infinite possibility of any type of god. If fact, there might be a chance for many gods to simply hate theists that believed in a false god and gives a harsher punishment, if that makes any sense to you. There might even be gods that reward atheists for all I know. This may seem illogical at first, but this is one of the consequences of infinite possibilities (Which you agreed on in your rebuttal) . Using this logic, any argument relating to Pascal's Wager is flawed due to the Infinite Possibility Argument. I would suggest you present another point. Sticking with this argument won't get you anywhere." True, There IS a possibility that a certain God who punishes Theists and Rewards Atheists exists, but then again- The Bible is an object that slightly raises the chance of the Christian/Catholic/etc. God. I know it might seem like i'm making the fallacy Ad Populus, but what I mean is this- There's an equally possible chance that the Christian/Catholic/etc. God exists and that a God that will punish Theists exist. But, the Bible says otherwise- And the bible is the "Tie breaker" here, because it's more likely that ancient humans documented the existence of a God than the possibility of a God that punishes Theists (That you just came up with now) exists. See, there's a 50-50 chance that the writers of the Bible made it to be taken seriously, and there's another 50-50 chance that they're just a bunch of history trolls. Now, that 50% adds to the chances that God is real, so it's 1/∞ + A small chance that God exists provided by the likeliness of the Bible.I know you might think, "Well I could just write stuff down and it would raise the chances of that thing existing", but it doesn't- Because you KNOW it's fake- We're not wondering whether or not you made that seriously, because we know you did it. The Bible, on the other hand, has a chance of being fake and a chance of being true, and the chance of being true adds to the chance of the existence of God, is cancelled out by the chance of it being fake, and then the most likely chance that ancient humans simply documented Holy Activity adds to the existence of God. So technically, by an extremely small amount, God is more likely than.. Say, "QOP", The god that Punishes Theists and rewards Atheists.I await your response..