oneness vs trinity

Let us closely look at my opponent's arguments. He first says this is the biblical trinity. If the biblical trinity does not exist then how is he able to reference it? He goes on to say he is sorry for not laying the foundation of his arguments down better. I disagree and do not accept his apology. He did not lay down ANY arguments. He made a statement, "there is no trinity". Statements are not arguments. An argument is created from a multiple of sources of thought and understanding to attempt to create a position (or an opposition to what is being said). He then goes on to say that it is not a good illustration of the trinity because his role as a human has many roles, but it is not three people. This means that he believes that it exists, but is merely not a good illustration of what is true. He then goes onto say if I had a different idea of what we are supposed to talk about, then he is sorry and he will stop. Do not stop, my oh so intelligent opponent! I would not want your arguments to be destroyed! All that hard work (typing out that paragraph for five minutes and that sentence for a few seconds) should not go to waste on such intellect as yours! I am so deeply sorry for my behavior. Because honestly, I knew exactly what you were talking about, yet I refused to acknowledge it because there was simply no explanation. It is COMPLETELY my FAULT that you wrote a single sentence, made no arguments, and even in response to my argument, made no arguments yourself. For example, the definitions of trinity: "the cardinal number that is the sum of one and one and one" "the union of the Father and Son and Holy Ghost in one Godhead" "three people considered as a unit" http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu... <------- (the only source so far) I will now argue against the Biblical trinity, merely to show my opponent that his one argument will not break through my defense made of arguments which can be shambled if one merely learns to read :P I am not a Christian. I do not think neither the trinity nor oneness exist. Yet I will show you why the trinity does exist. In the Bible, Jesus was claimed to be the son of God. Just after Jesus had baptized someone in a lake (don't know who, because honestly I don't believe that half drowning someone in magical water which was used as a toilet upstream is a good practice to do). Then the heavens opened up and this verse was put into the Bible: Mark 1:11 "And a voice came from heaven: "You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased." Now tell me, how is it possible that a voice comes from the sky, tells the people he is his son, and then you claim that this is not true merely because the title of the debate said so? Give me a break. It says right in your dam Bible that this is true :P 1 Corinthians 6:19 "What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?" John 4:24: "God is a Spirit." 1 Timothy 3:16 "And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." Ladies and gentlemen, I have hence argued the trinity directly from the Bible of my opponent (the beliefs that my opponent holds).