Unlimited Consciousness

May I also thank you for being an excellent protagonist. I do hope we both learn at least something and our time is not wasted. Forgive me if at times I don't follow the usual methods of communication or cite sources or my ‘authorities', as I refused to do my degree at University because of the implications, or if you like, straitjacket it would place upon my Thought and Imagination etc., I was a young naive enthusiast who should have been told " a degree is only a bit of paper to get you a worthwhile job, not True Education!" But I am pleased I did what I did as I am now bearing much golden fruit. But to the debate. Modern science has suggested that in actuality consciousness is an observable and physical aspect of our brains. I would contest the words ‘in actuality', as this ‘suggestion' of science is merely an unproven theory regarding the proven fact of bio-chemical activity within the brain having a direct relation to certain modes of thought, feeling and activity. We know there is a definite relationship. But am I to accept the ‘suggestion' that my True Consciousness - rather than activity within my brain - can be observed by a mere scientist, when it is plainly obvious I myself have not yet discovered my own consciousness fully. How could another individual have my ‘knowing' and prove it? How could they, by looking at some impulses in grey matter know anything at all about my true Identity, or yours? …consciousness and experience as an understandable function of the brain. It would be a waste of time debating the obvious proven fact of the whole complex arrangement of the human brain and nervous system, along with its direct connection with animal consciousness, intellect and physical experience via the senses. But I will again contest the use of a particular word ‘understandable' But then, I know the dilemma, and will now bravely state it clearly and simply: The consciousness and experience they speak of is only an aspect of the True Consciousness, which uses this body and animal ‘mind' as its instrument for learning purposes. Therefore, the area of our debate is how anyone can prove the existence of a superior Consciousness that uses the body, it senses and intellect for an unknown Purpose – that Purpose only being known when that Individual Consciousness either reveals itself to the lower intellect or is freed from the restrictions of the body and brain etc., But that's the point I made earlier in a comment – only that individual who experiences such a thing KNOWS it as it is! The fact that people have dreams, hallucinations, crazy notions and a kind of blind faith bears no relationship at all with this Superior Consciousness which cannot be known by intellectual debate - though intellectual discussion is one of the methods of awakening it – or eventually being Informed by it! A little analogy: It's a bit like a scientist studying all the electrical phenomena in a television ‘nervous' circuit and accurately relating the results to actions taking place upon the screen. My question is: could the experimenter by an intense study of the same, either know or prove anything at all about the actual lives of the real Actors and their actual Purpose? The issue of hallucinations. We know when we are awake, just like we do now while reading this. We know – unless we have faulty thinking through drugs, blind belief or accident – what our state of normal perceptive wakefulness is, and KNOW we are not hallucinating and can agree on certain unshakable principles and remain sane. Now, if that normal knowing or consciousness began to expand and intensify in your life and reveal a Knowledge and a Beauty beyond the scope of your normal thinking faculties, then would you suffer for awhile - until you achieved a fully accurate and undistorted assimilation or copy of the Great Insight giving a sense of Balance to whole thing – or shake it off as an unwanted fearsome intruder into your life. The latter action is like putting on a blindfold to hide a dazzling sun – but would also hide all the Beautiful Forms of its Revelation. But in any case, it would be impossible for you to prove such a thing to any normal thinking person – unless they had Awakened too. But even then, the proof would be limited by the mode of communication. We may be fooled while we are asleep and dreaming that a monster is real, and run from it in great fear, but when we Awaken, with relief we KNOW we were only dreaming. Similarly, but only as an analogy, when the Individual Consciousness Awakens, he or she realises that the world it has been living in was merely an aspect of limited consciousness connected with the physical senses. But, again, this cannot be proved by any known mode of communication, nor should it be attempted within the wrong company, as it causes pain and irritation in the ‘unready'. False Memory Syndrome. The reality of this false memory bears no relation to the Actuality of True Memory. Nothing else can really be said as it does not effect our debate. We may say we have a bad memory, but who forgets pay day? The only true memory is LOVE. What I mean is, the most important things that really matter to us are stamped far deeper and more accurately and are never forgotten. A so-called witness has a brief moment to recall something new and exterior through limited or even faulty senses, and therefore rarely reports a thing accurately. All memories are not the things themselves but only good or bad recordings. All human history is recorded, therefore, the only Time travel possible is the reading of these past records or studying the blueprints of the future – which future blueprints however are constantly being adjusted by us in the present. The only place you exist is HERE, and HERE can become deeper and deeper and more marvellous – a great Mystery indeed – and again unprovable from one to another, as BOTH must be Conscious of it. Eyewitnesses Clash. Their can be no other witnesses to your Consciousness - which Consciousness is our debate. It is therefore clear that individual conscious experiences are not an accurate measure to determine truth at all.. True, the lower, exterior intellect of a single person cannot determine truth, nor even a massive group of intellects. But they will form alliances with one another and after much experimentation discover some of the laws underlying nature, and by manipulating them, gain a certain amount of understanding and control over nature. They will attempt to count the number of stars in the sky and sand particles upon the beach and every so often discover something important. But Truth is unknown by any, even those who are Conscious of an even higher aspect within themselves. Truth is infinite and only seemingly limited by the present consciousness – in truth we are forever evolving and so is our conception of Truth.