It would be beneficial to kill every human besides 10 humans form the DDO website.

My case is simple.]First, killing all humans but these ten individuals would be horrendous for the human gene pool. This is because killing all humans but these ten individuals would create a bottleneck effect and would eliminate all human genes but the genes carried by these individuals. This means that any dominant disorders these individuals have would be magnified, and it would also increase he incidence of recessive genetic disorders through the expansion of the human population. Humans would become much more genetically simlar than we are now and would thus suffer extensively from diseases that we are all susceptible to. These problems are heightened by the fact that he selected 7 males and 3 females. Assuming that all of the females agree to reproduce with these males, all of the future are going to have very similar genes. The problem will be further heightened by the fact that 1 of the females (royalpaladin) will not under any circumstances reproduce with any of the males on the list. This reduces the number of females to 2 and further magnifies the problem within two generations. Second, repopulation will be difficult with these small number of people, and it is likely that all of the individuals will be wiped out. With only two potential female mates, for the next 18 years, only 2 individuals can be born every year (assuming that the females agree to this arrangement). Thus, population expansion will be nonsensically slow. Moreover, since the human population will be concentrated in a small area (the underwater city), a single disaster could eradicate the entire species. A single failure in the oxygen system, for example, could permanently end the human race. RebuttalsThe first thing that he tells you is that all of the world's diseases will be eradicated. This is a highly flawed assumption and is actually false. First, my opponent does not know if the people he has selected are carrying any diseases. At least one of the individuals could be carrying and STD or have a genetic disease, for example, that could rapidly infest every member of this population. Even if they do not have STDs or genetic disorders, one of these individuals could easily be ill while approaching the center. Moreover, some diseases, such as salmonella, or disaeases caused by E. Coli will be impossible to eradicate because their origins are not being destroyed; only their potential hosts are. Finally, new diseases have arisen throughout history (AiDS, for example, appeared in the late 1900s; it did not exist prior to that date), so my opponent can never truly eradicate human diseases.Most importantly, however, my opponent's goal and his methods contradict. The reason we dislike diseases is that they kill people/cause harm to people. In the process of protecting people from diseases, he is killing them and harming them. He is creating the same monster he hopes to desatroy through his barbaric methods. The next thing he claims is that there will be no population crisis. This is actually false; there will be no overpopulation crisis, but there will certainly be an underpopulation crisis as I demonstrated in my case.Most Important Reason to NegateThe most important reason to vote against his plan is that he does not include thett3 on the list of people who will be permitted to survive. If you want thett to die, vote for him. If not, vote for me.