Evolution V. Creationism

We must first define our terms in order to have a reasonable debate. I will provide a definition for both biological evolution and the biblical creation model which I subscribe to as it relates to living organisms. You can challenge or accept my definitions in the next round. Biological Evolution - The process by which organisms transform over eons of time through slight variations primarily brought about by natural selection acting upon genetic mutations which have led to the vast array of phenotypes displayed by all living and extinct organisms from a single common ancestor which existed approximately 3.5 billion years ago. Biblical Creation - A model based on direct revelation from God which describes a six day creation event in which all things were created less than 10,000 years ago. All living organisms were created as groups referred to as "kinds" from which all modern creatures have speciated from while remaining within their biological kind. The same processes involved in evolution have changed creatures over time, however, mutations are not seen to be able to allow organisms to leave their kind's genetic boundaries (i.e. novel genetic information is unable to give rise to the type of change required for evolution). I will support the biblical creation model of biological origins with three simple scientific lines of argumentation from genetics. I will respond to any of your challenges or claims in the next round. ARGUMENT 1 - GENETIC INORFMATION I posit that it can be demonstrated that genomes contain a type of universal information which only ever originates from an intelligent mind. If such can be vindicated, this would mean that genomes must have been created by an intelligent Creator(s) consistent with the biblical model of creation. While this would not disprove evolution per se, it is strikingly supportive of my case. ARGUMENT 2 - GENETIC REDUNDANCY With the discovery of the function of what was before referred to as "junk DNA" by many, we now understand genomes to contain an unusually high amount of redundancy of its informational content which is interpreted in both directions simultaneously. Not only does this redundancy demonstrate a supremely intelligent design, it ensures that creatures remain within a certain gene pool domain. If it can be shown that organisms are unable to deviate from these genetic constraints, my case will be supported and the evolution model will be refuted. ARGUMENT 3 - GENETIC ENTROPY While the power of mutations are seriously brought into question by modern population genetics, what is certain is that the time frame required for the evolution model is genetically infeasible. That is to say, given the nature of mutations, organisms could not have been around anywhere near as long as the evolution model requires. If it can be shown that mutations lead toward an extinction event via a net gain of detrimental mutations within a time frame much less than the purported 3.5Gy organisms are to have existed, the creation model will be amazingly supported while the evolution model will be refuted. I ask that you respond to the following question before addressing my claims: do you agree that if the above three points could be shown to be true, that the creation model would be supported and the evolution model refuted? If not, why so? Thank you for your time!