Killing Baby Girls Is Wrong, and by Extension, Abortion in General Is Also Wrong

"The babies killed in abortions are innocent human beings that are healthy and conscious and can feel pain. Therefore abortion is most definitely wrong." You are ignorant to state this. You are claiming that babies killed in abortions are healthy, conscious babies, able to feel pain, when in fact, they are fetuses, and commonly when abortions take place, they have not developed the nerve systems to be able to feel pain. You claim that I have no proof for that, because I am quoting doctoral sites, and doctors have no way of proving that fetuses cannot feel pain. This is not true at all. With the advancing technologies we have today, it is ignorant to assume that doctors cannot prove it. As well as this, fetuses in abortions are not always healthy. I have cited multiple sources about diseases that fetuses can develop in the womb that cause them to almost certainly die shortly after birth, and i will cite more: Anencephaly- "Anencephaly is a condition that prevents the normal development of the brain and the bones of the skull... Because these nervous system abnormalities are so severe, almost all babies with anencephaly die before birth or within a few hours or days after birth." (Genetics Home Reference) "Anencephaly is not compatible with life. Most babies with anencephaly are stillborn or die within days or hours of birth." (MedicineNet) "The quote from your source was wrong, and it also had no evidence." You claim that the quote from my source is wrong, when it is a word for word quote, and the evidence for the quote is that it is from a reputable source, that knows what they're talking about, because they have studied this topic. "'Science allows for us to develop pain relieving drugs such as Acetaminophen (Tylenol).' Tylenol cannot prevent babies in the womb from feeling pain, actually. " I never claimed that it would. I only said that it was a pain relieving drug. I used it as an example. They probably would use some sort of sedative. "Also, killing an innocent human baby is wrong whether or not that baby being feels pain as a result of her death, so this entire line of lies on your part is not only a blatant pack of lies, but it is also demonic in nature." You aren't addressing the fact that in some cases, abortion is the best option, for instance, with birth defects. "Your sources are also wrong." What makes you more reliable than my sources? You are determined to prove that you are correct, but you are ignoring the fact that science is real, and your personal opinion isn't based off fact, while I am citing scientific evidence. "without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between correct and incorrect reasoning." You are claiming that my scientific evidence is my faith based religious belief, while you are clearly using your faith based religious belief as fact, while not providing any evidence. "'You fail to provide any evidence proving that the specific practice of killing baby girls in their mothers wombs is morally wrong' Actually, I am satisfied with the entire result of this debate, win or lose, if I can simply expose the fact that believers in atheist Dogma (such as yourself) are of a demonic nature." You still fail to provide any evidence, instead making a personal attack, which is a logical fallacy ( Fallacy of relevance). "'doesn't make sense,' Yes it does." You are being unprofessional, claiming that your opinion is correct, without providing any evidence. "The word fetus means baby" I have stated multiple times that fetuses are not the same as babies, and provided evidence. Your arguments contradict each other. You previously stated that fetus means baby in Latin, but we are not debating in Latin, so that term loses its meaning. As I have previously stated, fetus has a different meaning in English. "'which invalidates your argument.' No it doesn't." Again, you failed to provide any evidence whatsoever. In conclusion, abortion is a constitutional right, and is the best option in some cases.