You are an eternal being

I'll post this early to make up for my lateness in the previous round. First I would like to point out that in two of your three points you are under the assumption the multiverse theory is true and your first point leans on the existence of parallel universes. Your first response particularly relies on this in the use of the many worlds theory. Considerable debate still surrounds this theory and others like it and it would be very difficult to prove. Because of this I don't believe this point to be sufficient enough to your argument. As a rebuttal to your chicken observation and objective existence of things I'll present a counter example which I'll call the Persian man. This man, born in the Persian Empire in 500bce. A poor man, lived a poor life and died childless. He never did anything noteworthy and so is quickly forgotten by time. His remains lost and decomposed. He may have objectively existed at some point but to every single person alive today this man did not exist and we will never know about him. This is the subjective side of existence, he does not exist to us. The particles that make him up may exist in some form in some places but he, the Persian man does not exist. I apply this to me on the grounds that eventually I too will likely be subjectively non-existent to people. To your second argument: while my memories and preferences and such may be stored in the physical sense as neurons the whole that they constitute (that which is me) is greater than their collective sum. In other words when these physical parts work together they have an essence in their newfound purpose, that purpose being the average functions of me. But once I die these parts no longer work together. My memories, preferences, ideas, hopes, etc. may exist in some form as neurons but they don't fulfill their purposes as memories, preferences, ideas, hopes, etc. and so they cannot be the same thing they once were. In a similar manner when a car is decommissioned and broken down for scrap we no longer call the scrap a car. It was formerly a car, now just scrap parts. Towards the other part if this argument, if you could create a copy of me down to the very thought process that behaved like me and made all my choices it would still not be the same person. Unless I am able to experience what they experience simultaneously while I also experience what I experience then they are not the same as I. We would be two independent beings no matter how alike we are. While I may not be the most well versed on the theory of the Big Bang I am correct in point out that time does begin with it and time will end with whatever is to follow [http://en.wikipedia.org...]. That being said eternity will be impossible for matter in our universe, for even if there are parallel universes the beings that may be my parallel self is still not me as I established in my previous paragraphs. For me to be eternal my essence and my parts would need to survive what will be the end of our universe. If my matter is transformed into energy it would never be said that "this specific collection of energy constitutes what is Internationalist" instead it would be said that "this specific collection of energy constitutes what was formerly Internationalist." I feel that with this argument I have repeated my previous argument, I apologize for the waning quality of my argument and bid pro good luck.