Does the Christian God exist

I had to read the religious debates that my opponent did in order to find out if this was his legitimate stance. I am sure many of you theists and atheists alike found Con to be a troll in this debate. I can confirm that this is not true. This is his stance. I will argue against this stance, and prove why it is so outrageous. I am Christian Hindu, Islamic, Mythologist Sikh. I am a practicing member of Greek, Norse and Egyptian principal. I am a Creationist. The reason I took up this debate wasn't to defend the Christian Religion, I was here to testify to the Validity of God's Son, Jesus as being the ONE GOD, in all of these religions. No, you basically admitted right there that God is a troll. You basically just admitted that God likes to play games with civilizations. You basically admitted that God sent prophets to different parts of the world, and sent completely different messages. You provide no evidence of all of these Gods being the same. There are similarities in these religions, but that is probably due to the fact that they were all made up by one common source which are humans. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Defense: "Human behaviour is the same in as it was. Therefor it is still applicable historical record. I won't cherry pick at all" In other words, my opponent concedes to the fact that all of those verses in the Bible are there. Timothy 2:12 A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness. But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet. For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve. My opponent deems this acceptable. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "If you want to attack creation here ~ Then you've lost by default. Ignorance to scientific evidence, is never worth anything in a debate. In fact, I have no pre-requisites to provide the information either You simply cannot attack it. Whether I hold the information or not. Furthermore, You say Human's proved evolution SO you have no grounds to suggest that the Observations found indicate the theory is true. SO proved Evolution was a bigoted claim. You cannot present it as fact, and certainly cannot push it: ie. "A scientific inquiry utilizes data not theory, to establish a model that is determined prior to render a predictable result. And it is scientific regardless of the results, so long as they (the results) were recorded." My opponent did not say anything of substance. This is a very absurd claim. "SO proved Evolution was a bigoted claim. You cannot present it as fact, and certainly cannot push it:" I cannot present evolution as fact. I cannot push the laws of gravity as fact. I cannot push basic scientific principles as fact, because they all are bigoted claims. Did my opponent provide any evidence to counter the evidence of Evolution? No, he did not. My opponent did not counter the fossil records evidence. My opponent fails to acknowledge the empirical evidence of evolution. The whole argument my opponent presented should be deemed as null. ------------------------------------- "There is only one God, whom is holistically all things. a "God" is an inaccurate account of all things. a god is a portion fo all things." If there is one God, than why didn't his message remain consistent with each civilization. --------------------------------------------------- Christians and Hindus know that their religions are different. Muslims and Mythologists know that their religions are different Jews and ancient Egyptian people know that their religions are different. My opponent has made some extremely broad claims with no facts to back them up. His arguments against Evolutions was more of a complaint. He concedes with the Bible Verses that confirm gender inequality. This debate was very weird.