Any age can love

It looks like my opponent seems to have drifted slightly from the actual meaning of the resolution. This round will be for a) getting us back on track and b) disprovng my opponent's case.Let's start with getting back on track with the actual purpose it seems that this debate was founded on, which was the motherhood saying "You're too young to love". My opponent seems to think, for the most part, this makes it impossible for us to feel love to our parents or friends, but this is inconsistent with the actual phrase. The phrase is connotatively meant for those who are young in age (meaning 12-14 or 15) who think that they have found the love of their life in some random girl. Thusly, I will propose a counter-definition to 'love'.Love, as defined by Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary, means attraction based on sexual desires. Since both sources are equally credible, we must look to resolutional reasons to prefer a definition over another. You're going to be preferring my definition because it is more in line with the actual resolution and the meaning of the saying in question. This definition is a massive blow against my opponent, as it makes a lot of his arguments invalid to the resolution. Those I will go through now.R1: Definition of loveAs I offered a counter-definition and reasons to prefer my definition, his definition is invalid, thus making the point of this argument invalid.R2: We can love GodUnless we're willing to get in bed with Jesus and 'do the do', this point holds no relevance to the resolution.R3: I love my friends!You willing to get it on with them? No? Not relevant.R4: Our first love!Now here's where we actually have a point that's relevant to the resolution. But even this point has a lot of problems with it. I will refer to a point I brought up that I would talk about in the last round, which is a maturity requirement to truly understand love.While it may be true that a 13 year old could potentially fall in love with a girl he runs into in the hallway, it's highly unlikely that they have the maturity to feel it. The younger a person is, the less maturity, on average, that the person possesses. Maturity is an important thing to consider in any relationship because even if they have the most passionate love for one another, the simplest fight over something as small as one loaning the other a pencil for a scan-tron test could rip them apart forever. Love needs maturity to fully flourish to it's maximum potential, and those of younger age do not have the maturity required to meet this.Also, I feel it necessary to remind the crowd of one important detail. The pro's BOP is to prove that ANY age can feel this sexual desire. As this was not specifically adressed in my opponent's last speech, I will set the age range required to fully fulfill the resolution from the moment a baby leaves the mother's womb to the moment one dies. The pro must prove that anywhere in that range, from the very beginning to the very end, one can feel this sexual desire that the resolution talks about. Since I'm sure we can agree that infants and toddlers cannot feel a sexual desire of any sort, the resolution is easily negated.Thusly, vote con.Source:http://www.merriam-webster.com...