Christian Doctrine is correct

Thank you con for this interesting topic and I look forward to seeing how it turns out. I will keep the definitions for arguments sake just for clarity. Definitions: "Correct" means "free from error; in accordance with fact or truth." [1] Thus, "correct" means having zero errors or internal inconsistencies and being in accordance with fact, as opposed to fiction. Truth coincides with the "best explanation" for something. [2] If the better explanation for anything is that Christian Doctrine is wrong, then I win. My Position I.The Trinity is concise Yes, God did create Adam and Eve and placed them in the Garden of Eden which was considered paradise, but nowhere does it say that Adam and Eve ate an apple, it says that they ate a fruit (just wanted to point that out). Moreover, God was displeased with the disobedience to their rebellion of what He had commanded them not to do, therefore; He placed the curse of sin upon all humanity. It is not so much of whether God was angry with humanity, but that He needed to reveal the sin to them to realize how they fell into the trap of a lie rather than trusting in Him to believe what He had commanded them to do. This showed just how much God gave them the free will to decide for themselves what they considered right and wrong and they chose to disobey by their own free will, God had to do something about it. It wasn’t the idea of them just sinning it was because as this quote states, “We’re not sinners because we sin. We sin because we’re sinners.” meaning that it being sinners is not as much of an excuse as us sinning at all, so in Adam and Eve’s case, they knew what they were doing was rebellious and yet still did it despite what God had warned them. However as an act of love, grace, righteousness, mercy and automatic forgiveness; God sent Jesus to die on the Cross for all of mankind, but what is often negated is that without some form of atonement there would no way of being shown grace, forgiveness or mercy. There would only His wrath which is hell. In the days of the Old Testament, the way for people to be shown any of those attributes from God is through a sacrifice of some animal for atoning their sins, once Jesus came and died and rose from the dead, atonement was meant and fulfilled which hence-- no longer is there needed of doing things to atonement for oneself’s sin. Jesus died to free bondage of sin and take God’s wrath upon Himself not because He was angry with the world. Without a sacrifice is nothing more than deserved punishment in hell due to one’s own sin, not God’s doing. My opponent suggests that Jesus is not God when even in the New Testament of Scripture “I and the Father are one.” (John 10:30). Jesus told this to the people who asked who He was because they too did not believe who He said He was, but His response being that He and God are One, which would ultimately indicate of Him suggesting that they are in fact Triune. II.Repentance is the Key to Salvation ALONE People did not automatically go to hell, but rather a place of Hades.Hades: is a temporary place where souls are kept as they await the final resurrection. In which, is to say that people did not go to hell or heaven, but rather had to wait on judgement and more or less still have to today. Although, just because Muslims or Jews believe differently than Christians does not mean that while they live on this earth are already going to hell because that is to suggest God is impatient, and if He is impatient than He is a liar, but since He is patient that is why He sent His Son Jesus to die on the Cross so that everyone has hope. Now it is up to all people to decide whether to obey God accept what Christ did or when they do die without Christ/God in their life then yes, they have already condemned themselves to hell. Without the Trinity is really no hope whatsoever. It would have been just justice and wrath upon mankind had it not been for God showing His grace, love, mercy and forgiveness through His Son’s death on the Cross. Had He not risen it would have been in vain. III.The Bible IS the True and Inerrant Word of God //A// Young Earth Creation is false So why say evolution is plausible? Conflicting genealogies So you're suggesting that its possible that Jesus isn’t who He says He is just because of some differences? Just trying to understand. Mythical creatures I’m sorry, I don’t believe I’m familiar with this actually? But regardless, this is just wrong because I don't see how people would believe that? (just my opinion though) Non-adoption of canon It is true that Revelations seems harsh, but it is a prophecy that WILL be fulfilled and is slowly happening today even. Archaeologists have disproved the Exodus There is evidence of a place known as Nineveh that was destroyed do to the sexual immoral and idolatry that took place at that time. “They lie as they fell more than 2,600 years ago, a writhing clump of humanity frozen in a moment of fearful combat. Pieces of armor, iron daggers, pikes, and other weapons litter the ground. Buried in the desiccated leg bone of one of the soldiers is another emblem of blood and pain: a triple-bladed bronze arrowhead, cunningly shaped to inflict maximum harm. This tableau of nine skeletons, recently uncovered in northern Iraq, represents the first clearly documented evidence of an epic story that has been shrouded by centuries of myth and speculation: the downfall of Nineveh, the capital of what was then the world's mightiest empire…” (3) The Contradiction of free will This is true, God does has pre-ordained all things to exist as it does, but that does not negate the fact that God is not all-knowing (Psalm 15:3) The eyes of the Lord are in every place, beholding, the good and the evil. (4) The problem of evil No, God did “murder” those children, He simply took their spirits to be with Him. How is this murder? (5) Abortion is morally permissible One of the Ten Commandments by God is, Thou shalt not murder. (exodus 20:13), so explain to me how it is permissible for unborn babies to have their lives ended? That in itself is immoral. Well then she is blaming the child that did nothing wrong. She could easily out the child up for adoption if she does not wish to keep the baby. [1] Google's dictionary [2] [http://gracethrufaith.com...] [3] [http://www.gotquestions.org...] [4] [http://www.bibleprobe.com...]