I actually met god in a dark back corner of a busy street

Oh goodie, someone who actually thinks he knows god better than god knows himself. This oughta be fun. “I will attempt to answer each of your questions to the best of my ability.” By your reasoning, you do not have that ability because you cannot put yourself in your god’s shoes and know what he through to put his ridiculous laws, rules and regulations into place. Some rules first. 1. You play by my rules. I do not play by yours. If you do not like it, leave. I don’t care. I’m not here to please you. Nor am I here to make friends with you. I’ve got genuine friends whereas you probably don’t as so so so so many here on debate.org don’t. 2far4u2CharlesDarwin is clearly one that doesn’t as he starves for attention. Bad idea. 2. I will use this again and again as I have done is all of my debates. Now here’s how I run things… if there is the slightest hint of you inventing excuses from something in which you clearly know nothing about, especially when its the subject in which you claim to professing you have knowledge upon, namely this one, and you really don’t, and yet you pretend that you do by coming up with invented excuses and or flat out lying, I will insult you with my brand of insults that are original, funny, stupid, deranged and walls to the ball insane, unless those excuses are so far fetched that they are clearly pulled off from your groin to be a groin pull from the gold-i-lox area to keep scientists looking for other planets, then all bets are truly off and I may end the debate right then and there because I DO KNOW my stuff, whereas most don’t. Who knows? I may give you 3 strikes and you are out. 3. I will use videos from youtube which are perfectly acceptable. Its just too bad that in YOUR mind you think that they are biased because it is rather point blank obvious that you have not watched them, because they are truthful. The reason why you don’t want me to post them, ah yes, is because you have absolutely no counter to what they say. Nor can you handle truth when slapped in the face with it as no christian, who claims himself to be a christian, in which there is no such a thing because christ was not the messiah, but nah you cannot even open your bible and actually read the damn thing, just like nearly 100% of all christians who claim themselves to be christians, and its really dismal and pathetic. Oh and btw, Its not the youtube videos that matters. Its the content and what is said on the youtube videos that matters. Its too bad that you do not like it. Deal with it. If you are going to use your bible, in which is never evidence of any kind, at all not ever, not for any reason, then your my dear lost little bore, who really can’t save himself from the 0% of nothingness, then you cannot use your bible for anything. Regardless, that will be destroyed. 4. No we will be using the KJV because that is the most accurate version of an English translation. The ESV is an abomination in which changes A LOT of what god has said and what other characters have said, and what verses have said so that it is truly unreadable and unusable. Here’s a couple of examples: genesis 1: 1-7KJV In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. 6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. ESV In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. 3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness.5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day. 6 And God said, “Let there be an expanse[a] in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” 7 And God made[b] the expanse and separated the waters that were under the expanse from the waters that were above the expanse. And it was so.Right off the bat *mistake #1. “heaven” VS “heavens”. Sheesh. * Mistake #2 “hover” VS “move” Hover 1. to hang fluttering or suspended in the air:The helicopter hovered over the building. 2. to keep lingering about; wait near at hand.3. to remain in an uncertain or irresolute state; waver: Move 1. to pass from one place or position to another. 2. to go from one place of residence to another:They moved from Tennessee to Texas. 3. to advance or progress:* Mistake #3 “firmament” 1. the vault of heaven; sky. VS “Expanse” 1. an uninterrupted space or area; a wide extent of anything: an expanse of water. 2. Something that is spread out, especially over a relatively large area: that great expanse, the sky. 3. expansion; extension: the wide expanse of scientific knowledge. Nowhere would ANYONE know that “expanse would refer to “the vault of heaven”. And here’s some MAJOR mistakes right off the bat from BOTH of your bibles. This is take from The Secular Web…GE 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven(s) and the earth." (One might ask what "existed," and where God dwelt, before he created heaven and earth. Of course, if God were pure spirit the question could be considered moot, but inasmuch as the God of the Bible allegedly participated in a wrestling match, ate solid food, was seen face to face, spoke with Moses, etc., it would seem that he possesses physical attributes, including form.) (Note: Some biblicists contend that biblical chronology fixes the date of creation at 4004 B.C. thereby making the earth about six thousand years old. Some present-day creationists stubbornly adhere to a young earth timetable in spite of overwhelming evidence that the earth is actually billions of years old.)GE 1:3-5, 14-19 There was light ("night and day") before there was a sun. (Note: If there were no sun, there would be no night or day. Also, light from the newly created heavenly bodies seems to have reached the earth instantaneously though it now takes thousands or millions of years.)See this is EXACTLY to the letter + oh a good 40 other reasons why YOUR god, in which you cannot even prove even exists, and if somewhat reasonably intelligent, in which he’s clearly not, would ---never--- use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible would have foreseen all of this carelessness, sloppiness, sloppiness and true confusion. There’s a 0% chance in taking YOUR scriptures literally. Now that’s a true comedy of errors. Oh darn, I guess its that time to use some youtube “content” videos.http://www.youtube.com... -The god that christians believe in is amazingly STUPID!!!!“We have to rely on copies of copies of anonymous authors with no originals and the textural testimony to a miracle for example, there’s no amount of reports, anecdotal reports that is sufficient to justify in believing that actually happened as reported. And anything that would qualify as a god would clearly understand this and if it wanted to clearly convey this to people in a way that is believable would not be relying on ---TEXT--- to do so. And this to me is the nail in the coffin for christianity. The god that christians believe in is amazingly ---STUPID---!!! If it actually wants to achieve its goal by spreading its word to humanity by relying on text, by relying on languages that die off, by relying on anecdotal testimony, that’s not a pathway to truth. And anything that would qualify for a god would know this.which shows either god does not exist or doesn’t care enough about the people to understand the nature of evidence to actually present it. Now which of those two possibilities is accurate?” Matt Dillahunty “If jesus and Muhammad and abraham and moses had never been born, which in any case I tend to dabble, if all their stories were untrue were suddenly found and everyone had to admit it some people I know would show panic. Now what would we do? We’d have no morals suddenly. What could be more nonsensical than that? As the matter of fact the position that we occupy would---be---precisely---the---same as it is now if none of these texts had ever been written, as if none of these lacerations had ever been made. We would still have to reason together about how how to treat one another, about how to build a just city, and about how to have irony and a sense of humor.” Christopher Hitchens http://www.youtube.com... Atheist Experience 21:49 with Tracie Harris zand Don BakerCall starts at approx 47:30. Picks up after a long introduction 54:45 and really gets into it 1:03:30 - 1:11:30. Pay attention everybody to vidie #2 and how YOU as a christian can easily misinterpret YOUR bible which is one of the reasons why YOUR god would --- NEVER --- use text as a form of communication. Don Baker, one of the hosts here in the vidie also briefly mentions it. And he's 100% correct! http://www.youtube.com... - The Bible is not Evidence of god “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The claim that there is a god is an extraordinary claim in which requires more evidence than simply pointing to an old book. That is simply not rational, not sufficient to the claim. Sorry its not just an opinion. There’s more to life than that.” Matt Dillahunty , Oh darn I'm out of space. If you wish to continue with this debate, please bring in an intelligent argument.