Relativity Is Wrong

I would like to start off by defining some terms; 1. Relative ADJECTIVE "Considered in relation or in proportion to something else. " 2. Relativity NOUN "The dependence of various physical phenomena on relative motion of the observer and the observed objects, especially regarding the nature and behaviour of light, space, time, and gravity. " The reason I chose to define these terms was to show that I am able to differentiate between them as I will be using them quite often. Relativity is a big field with many physicists continuously working to successfully find more “evidence” to prove the theory. Hopefully throughout this debate I will attempt to explore the flaws in relativity and why it has become the biggest drawback in scientific history. Since this is a relatively short debate I will cover 3 major issues in relativity (all in different arguments). In chronological order: Relativity And Time Relativity And Gravity Relativity And Motion Let’s begin with the first issue; time. Time is known to a useful tool in our everyday lives, but physicists believe that time is actually a part of our universe. I propose that time is NOT part of our universe and just a tool to merely describe rotation. There are many papers which perfectly explain this although have been disregarded as being “crack pottery” even though they provide evidence. The only true unit in our universe is DISTANCE. When we measure time, we measure rotation. Consequently when we measure rotation we measure distance. Here is a quote from Miles Mathis’ paper: A Revaluation Of Time. “I maintain that time is simply a measurement of movement. This is its most direct definition. Whenever we measure time, we measure movement. We cannot measure time without measuring movement. The concept of time is dependent upon the concept of movement. Without movement, there is no time. Every clock measures movement: the vibration of a caesium atom, the swing of pendulum, the movement of a second hand. ” Now hold on, I am not implying that time has no use in our world however it has no significance in our UNIVERSE. This brings us to the concept of velocity. Let me be clear velocity and time is actually the same thing, unit less. Here is Miles Mathis’ perfect explanation of velocity “The measurement of time is necessary to the measurement of velocity. It may be that time was not even "invented," in the modern sense, until someone first thought of the idea of velocity. Velocity is the measurement of the change in position of one thing (the object in question) relative to the change in position of another thing (the cesium atom, or the pendulum, etc. ). Once you have conceived of the idea of velocity in this way, you realize that it can be measured in only one way: Compare the unknown movement to a known movement. That is, find something in your world that moves as uniformly as possible, and let that be your clock. Then compare your unknown movement to the movement of your clock. That is what velocity is. ” This again is also a measurement of distance and can be expressed within the following equation: Velocity = Distance / Time = Distance / Invented Distance = (Unitless Scale) (Extracted from UDT) Now here is the part you have all been waiting for, the proof: In this part I will attempt to debunk two famous experiments preformed to test the space-time model. The first being; Gravity Probe B Experiment Gravity Probe B (GP-B) is a satellite-based mission which launched on 20 April 2004 on a Delta II rocket the spaceflight phase lasted until 2005; its aim was to measure space-time curvature near the Earth. Even though it has been PROVEN that electromagnetic fields affect gyroscopes and clocks. This brings us onto our next experiment; Hafele–Keating experiment. This famous experiment, used to test time dilation failed miserably in its attempt to explain general relativity. By placing an atomic clock into a plane they observed that the clock has loss / gained a couple of nanoseconds. But this only happens because the atomic clocks are under a LOWER electromagnetic field then on earth which yet again DOES affect clocks, gyroscopes and the whole lot. I will end with some quotes that you might think about extracted from the paper(s) thanks, “Time is a tool with a constant unit, or an invented physical unit based on a relative measurement of distance, where there is a uniform movement. This tool can be used to measure the velocity or speed of an object in such way that change or differences are described as comparatively relative motion. Time can be considered, therefore, a measurement of relative movement. Velocity is a relative measurement for a distance travelled per unit of time. Time is a distance. ” - Abdulsalam Almayahi UDT “It is also clear at a glance that the numbers in this experiment were pushed to provide confirmation. I can't tell you exactly how from this article, since they don't provide the math, but we may assume they did it in the same way they did it in the Hafele-Keating experiment. I have already exposed the Hafele-Keating Experiment as a fraud, and in that experiment they do the same thing they do here: they claim great accuracy in measurement, but make a hash out of the basic theory and of all rules of science. The Hafele-Keating experiment is the one where the airplanes with atomic clocks flew around the Earth, and the clocks gained or lost tiny fractions of seconds compared to clocks on the ground. But there, as here, the non-zero result is just assumed to be caused by gravity, with no effort to consider, discuss, mask, or limit any other effects. Just as the most obvious example, the E/M field is utterly ignored in both experiments! This despite the fact that the E/M field is known to have chirality, and is known to affect gyroscopes and clocks! ” -Miles MathisSOURCES WILL BE IN COMMENT SECTION