I should be the dictator of DDO

Point of this debate I get that this debate topic was trying to be funny. In the middle of a dramatic DDO presidential campaign you suggest that you should be dictator of DDO. I was half annoyed and half ready to humor you in accepting the debate. Round 2 you made no legitimate points and did not even try to while offering random fake criticisms of the site, leadership and other members. It read like a bid to be noticed on the site while antagonizing others. Even Troll debates should have a point: they are still debates. Your resolution is full of holes. Although you insist this debate is about ‘IF’ you should take power you invite me to criticize your nonexistent plan in round 1. You have not presented any reason why you should be DDO dictator and you have not even tried to present any kind of argument. This debate is in the arts section, not funny, misc or entertainment. Why on earth did you choose arts? I like troll debates but this is not in any way a debate. Making random assertions, fake criticisms and promotions of yourself as leadership are just a bit too much imo. “However this debate is only about IF I should take power.” You did not in anyway establish this round one. “This debate is to give me some more ideas while I'm making my plans.” How is that in any way a debate? If you want help to promote yourself head to the forums. “Now Con is telling me what I should do...” In round 1 you said, “Con's job will be to convince me that I should not put my plan into action.” A plan that you still have not presented. “Well there is a Dictatorship right now only in a different form.” How is this website in any way like a dictatorship? Look, fake criticisms about the site with no evidence or point are not entertaining. “Why don't you define it first?” (spamming and trolling) You clearly have a problem with this and you don’t have a working definition? I think the definitions are personal to whatever you find annoying. I don’t know how I would define spamming and trolling but the polls you have offered recently like, “should poop be illegal in China?” arguably do not add anything to the site but random annoyance: http://www.debate.org... “Imabench is an annoying troll who tried to ruin your DDO experience by being rude, insulting, and stupid.” That’s your opinion and if you have a problem take it up with him. You’re not exactly raising the bar by using debates as a platform to snipe at other members. “Adolf Hitler claimed he was doing the right thing by killing Jews. So he was credible right since everybody believed him?” What does Godwins law have to do with your reputation and a bid for fake leadership? I will not be "a candidate". I will be THE CANDIDATE!!! This still seems like a flailing bid to be acknowledged more than anything else. By ‘candidate’ for dictator I meant you are just one member vying for power. There is no reason to suspect that you will ever have absolute power over DDO. Ever. “From my polls you can see the percentage of DDO that supports me.” Again you have admitted that the poll was not about you and have not established that anyone supports you as dictator. Why do you feel the need to equate random poll votes with popularity like this? “It was an attempt to make Imabench pay for his crimes.” Take it up with him. Why start debates directed at members you have a problem with in the first place? “Yes thats what was said by the DDO president who has been trying to prevent free speach for many months now.” What? A limit of ten debates in 24 hours is reasonable. If comments like this are supposed to be entertaining… they’re not. “Yes but the poiny is that nobody said they hate me.” Look, your many polls and a debate topic like this are just too much. What exactly are you looking for? I would rethink your strategy. “It helps people see how popular I really am.” http://www.debate.org... Look, a racecar poll where 8 people vote for a car named after you does not establish popularity. I think it’s more important to ask yourself why that is how you see this as the purpose of your polls, to establish popularity. Seriously. “Con clearly doesn't know what a democratically elected government is.” Look, any contributing member can vote for DDO president. It’s a fair process while a plan to seize power forcibly is not. - At this point Con has just made random assertions and sniped at other members, the site and current leadership. I get that Con opened by trying to be funny but I don’t like the tone and if you are going to offer even fake criticism like this at least have some kind of point.