Ron Paul is the best candidate in the current GOP race.

I look forward to a good debate, CON.** If CON could clarify whether or not he will be comparing Ron Paul to another GOP candidate in the race or find faults with his policy, that would be great.• Ron Paul's non-interventionist foreign policy is ultimately the best for America.All of his colleagues in the GOP race supports an interventionist policy one way or another when it comes to foreign relations. In the CNN GOP Debate that took place in June of 2011 @ New Hampshire (link included), when Ron Paul was asked about his unique view of pulling out of Middle East, he gave a comparison to China. Right now, China is investing in various nations around the world to build basic infrastructure (prominently in African nations) in exchange for oil deals. Yet, America is acting unnecessarily as the self-proclaimed police of the world. After spending billions per year in this volatile region, what have we truly achieved? Tens of thousands of civilian deaths, injuries, and refugees. Further political instability. Aggravating the terrorist threat. A plethora of American soldiers dead.I agree - the US should selflessly be involved in a war if it will ultimately save more lives than kill, and if its pros will outweigh the cons. Unfortunately, this war in Middle East is qualified for neither requirements of a just war. And now, President Obama has recklessly jumped into Libya - without congressional (and thus, constitutional) approval.Ron Paul's message is a comprehensive one: "Pull out of the region, and focus getting our own nation back on track." If we are going to efficaciously assist these nations gain independence, we must do so after achieving domestic stability. It is time America takes off the police badge for awhile, and realize that there is a superabundance of problems at home that needs to be dealt with - immediately. Focus on getting the $1.3 trillion dollar debt reduced; stop outsourcing and recover American jobs; and make our economy thrive once again. • Ron Paul is a politician of integrity and honesty, and is not a facile, hypocritical one like the rest of the GOP candidates.Here is a short (but meaningful) video that reveals the hypocritical, equivocal nature of the forerunner, Mitt Romney. For instance, he says that he is strictly "pro-life," but in another advertisement, he claims that abortions should be legal and safe in the US. http://www.youtube.com...Here is Tim Pawlenty's public denunciation of "Romneycare" and Mitt Romney himself:http://www.youtube.com...Yet, when he was asked to expound on his criticism of Romneycare in the New Hampshire debate, he made a flagrant sidestep, avoiding the question.Michele Bachmann's asinine rhetoric - including claiming that America is heading towards a "gangster government" and that "not all cultures are equal." ** As an important note, this woman believes that creationism should be taught in school alongside evolution.http://www.youtube.com...Herman Cain firmly states that he will not hire an Islam to his cabinet if he becomes elected as the President. His reasoning - Islam and Sharia law do not belong in the American government, quote "just like Christianity." Yet, this man has said that America can recover "if we believe in God" in his own announcement for the presidential bid:http://www.youtube.com...Check Ron Paul's voting records, and you will see that he has persistently defended his ideologies and political stances throughout his 12 terms in the Congress. Whether you agree or disagree with Paul's views, you should respect him for his political honesty - something that is missing in the other candidates, who either flip-flop or repudiate their views entirely just to procure more votes.• Ron Paul is a champion of the Constitution.It always flummoxed me that both parties love to flaunt their efforts to guard the Constitution - yet Dr. Paul has been considered a "fringe candidate." The Constitution is quite simple - it is a layout for the American government to follow, and it has proved itself valuable - after all, America has become the #1 nation in the world. So what is so confusing about following it? For instance, limited federal government. The Constitution gives powers that haven't been exclusively assigned to the Federal government to the state government. This means - gay marriage, prostitution, drug use - all of them should be voted on by the constitutents of the state. The government does not have the powers to decide these matters. Keep the government out of personal liberties!Another interesting fact is that Ron Paul is the only politician who seems to value liberty. America was founded on liberty. It was built upon this freedom - freedom from Anglicianism and monarchy of the Great Britain. Ron Paul promotes fundamental liberties that all people deserve. Unless the Founding Fathers were seriously misguided, freedom leads to happiness.• Ron Paul has a comprehensive illegal immigration policy, while other GOP candidates do not.It is ineluctable that all GOP candidates support reducing the number of illegal ailens in these nation and keeping them out. The problem is - how? All others except Ron Paul cannot offer a comprehensive policy, except deportation. However, Dr. Paul's policy is simple and likely to be efficient: eradicate amnesty for illegal immigrants. Right now, America spends billions on providing health care, education, public services, social security, and welfare to illegals. As well, they are given jobs - something 13 million unemployed Americans would like very much. Dr. Paul says:get rid of all of them! Stop the welfare. Stop allowing employers to hire them - and make the penalty more severe. Spending millions on building a border and hiring more "advanced security systems" will be futile effort unless America deracinates amnesty. There are no other GOP candidates who hold such a clear-cut plan to mitigate the illegal immigrant conundrum.----------------------For these reasons, I strongly urge that voters vote PRO, and support Ron Paul for 2012.I look forward to CON's argument.