I am bad at debating

R#1: There is evidence. People can simply look at the profile of people you have debated. Regardless, it doesn't matter whether you knew or not, the fact is that you debate weaker debaters.After 5 debates, one can hardly make the hasty generalization that I only debate weaker debaters. Just because I have not lost a debate so far, it doesn"t mean I only debate weaker debaters. Is the Pro saying he is a weaker debater then by his same logic?R#2: Not entirely non-sequitur. You can't say a "debater" is good at "debating" when they rarely even debate, and debate people who are less good at debating. That's like saying a fireman is good at putting out fires when he only successfully put out a small fire a couple times.The pro seems to have used a false analogy. Someone can be excellent at doing a particular thing even if they have only done it a few times. Also, debating doesn"t only exist only - if someone debated 10 years in real life competitively, and then joined DDO and only had a few debates, one can hardly say that they are a debater. R#3: You"re right, it isn't a "must". But I'm not saying it's a "must". Defining terms is a general rule to follow, and all good debaters follow this rule. Good debaters also don't use fallacious arguments, even though there is strictly no "rule" against fallacious arguments. Also, you're wrong assumption is no defence. You shouldn't assume what your opponent is thinking! You should make the rules and terms properly defined at the beginning of every debate. If you don't, you're an inferior debater! There's nothing more to it.Yes, defining terms is a good general rule to follow. However, my debate clearly said that the opposite side should try to show that I am bad at debating. Therefore, since they had the burden, it is valid to give them an understandable topic, so that if they wanted to use a definition, they would define it properly. Instead, the pro attempted to win by purposefully going against English grammar and normal definitions by using semantics. This is not what anyone would intend for the opposing side to do. The reason I left this debate unrestricted is because I wanted the opponent to be free to go about this topic however he/she wished. I would have hoped the Pro would"ve used the first argument space to clarify, define, etc., instead of just stating the substance-less "Your good at debating :D."R#4: If you did look at the rules, you wouldn't have accepted. How do I know your lying? Because if you knew, you would request a character increase in the comments section instead of accepting and then complaining. Why? Because then the instigator would have been able to change the settings. But you didn't, you presumptuously accepted the debate and then complained afterwards.No, I still wanted to accept because I was interested in the debate. It seems as if the Pro is trying to shift topics to my "lying." I am not very familiar with DDO, so I thought once a challenge was put up, it could not be edited by the perpetrator. This in no way shows that I am bad in debating however.R#5: You can't be good at something if you rarely even do it, and do it with inferior debaters! And how would you know if they were biased or not? You can't read minds!*In conclusion, the only argument the Pro side seems to have come up with is that I rarely debate, and I debate weaker arguers, therefore I myself am a bad debater. Again, saying I "rarely" debate is both erroneous, and does not show anything. I accept debates ever since I joined a few weeks ago - I simply do not see how this shows I am a bad debater. Again, just because I only have 5 debates on DDO, it doesn"t mean I am a bad debater - the president could join DDO and have 5 debates - would this make him a bad debater? Also, I don"t choose debaters based on who my opponent is - I debate based on interesting topics. If my opponent is worse than I am at debating, this doesn"t reflect on me at all as a quality of debater. Thus, the Pro side failed to uphold the Burden of Proof to show I am a bad debater - therefore, vote con!*Yes, no hard feelings.