Justin Bieber should be Deported.

I'll make this short, sweet and to the point... To clarify: we're talking about deportation here and now, in the absence of any trial (as one has hence fourth not taken place), so my opponent's arguments must be evaluated in that context. I. Moral turpitude, and the law regarding immigrants Now that my opponent has linked driving under the influence, among other things, to being acts of moral turpitude, let's make a distinction between being "arrested" for something and being "convicted" of something. At this point, Bieber has only been charged with a particular crime, and has not been convicted of it. If convicted, then and only then would it be permissible to entertain a discussion of his possible deportation. Thus far, in that Bieber has only been charged, talk of deporting him for alleged -and only alleged- crimes of moral turpitude or otherwise necessarily "jump the gun" (to put this metaphorically. Insofar as they are premature, pursuant to the procedures of due process, talk of Beiber's deportation is premature. (The alliteration was intentional... gotta have some fun somewhere, right?) II. Moral turpitude, and no special treatment for fame In making the claim that "the evidence" is "completely against" Justin Bieber, as sufficient justification for the Canadian pop star's deportation, my opponent has in effect usurped the American court system, ignored due process, and is arguing for the issuing of a sentence on the presumption of guilt without trial. This could not be more antithetical to how the US criminal justice system conventionally works, and in deviating from that convention, my opponent is in effect arguing for Beiber's receipt of "special treatment" presumably because he is famous. My opponent's hypocrisy, therefore, cannot be lost upon the judge. Whatever statement's JB may or may not have made in regard to this specific incident, or others, would only be relevant to the proceedings of a trial, and are not relevant here, in that not only has no trial even commenced. Moreover, due to the fact that no trial has commenced, any discussion of potential sentencing (i.e. deportation) is premature in that Bieber has not even been found guilty, and therefore cannot be sentenced for a crime for which he has not yet been convicted. III. Felony charges As I've mentioned above, whatever Bieber may or may not have admitted to is irrelevant to the question of whether or not he should be deported. This is because the question of Bieber's prospective deportation (the sentence he would receive if found guilty of a crime) can only be asked after Bieber is found guilty, if Bieber is in fact found guilty, which thus far he has not been. My opponent has wholeheartedly failed to rebut this point, presumably because he is aware that what he is arguing for circumvents due process, which is the cornerstone of the American criminal justice system. By that same principle, my opponent's objection to Beiber's trial (that "is only fighting it because he has the money needed to wrongly win") likewise is dismissible because Bieber is entitled to a robust legal defense. Conclusion: Only those who have been tried and found guilty can be sentenced. Bieber has not been tried, nor has he been found guilty. Because deportation is a sentence, deporting Beiber in the absence of a trial which resulted in his conviction would be in violation of his right to due process. Therefore, Bieber should not be deported.