The 1969 Moon Landing Was A Complete Hoax

Thank you for excepting the debate. First, I will touch on the points you rebuttled from my opening arguments and then make a few more added points to this topic. 1) I understand the ideology behind believeing the six "supposed" moon landings from 1969-1972. However, this is just another ridiculous claim that shows the ill intentions behind this hoax. Taking into consideration, that in a matter of three years, NASA landed 6 missions (6!) on the moon a little over a decade after getting a man in space...ludacris. ~First manmade satellite in orbit (October 1957, Sputnik 1). ~First living creature to enter orbit (November 1957, Sputnik 2). ~First to safely return living creature from orbit, two dogs Belka and Strelka, 40 mice, 2 rats (August 1960, Sputnik 5). ~First man in space (April 1961, Vostok 1). ~First man to orbit the Earth (April 1961, Vostok 1). ~First to have two spacecraft in orbit at the same time (though it was not a space rendezvous, as frequently described) (August 1962, Vostok 3 and Vostok 4). ~First woman in space (June 1963, Vostok 6, as part of a second dual-spacecraft flight including Vostok 5). First crew of three cosmonauts on board one spacecraft (October 1964, Voskhod 1). ~First spacewalk (EVA) (March 1965, Voskhod 2). Then, 4 years after a spacewalk, we have three years that included six moon landings? Take into consideration our present situation: NASA will have waited (and they have presented these unintended "goals" before) 46 years to return to the moon? There is a reason NASA is "under funded" for this exploration. 2) I am aware of the astronauts existing. I am also aware that they only speak at NASA funded presentations or book signings. Bart Sibrel, a leading investigative journalist regarding the hoax, has spent hours documenting the inaccuracies between the astronauts own experiences. If you go to Google Video and type in his Bart's name, you will find numerous videos documenting the astronauts own undoings. In regards to your famous "Earth Rising" picture, it is interesting that the photo shows the astronaut's reflective face shield, but the person/camera taking the picture is not seen in the reflection? 3) The background picture similarities was not an isolated dispute as you claim. Over the six "missions" NASA has had to back track on more than a dozen photo cover-ups and misleading time discrepencies between what actually "happened" and was was reported. 4) As for your missing tapes rebuttle. Blueprints and design and development drawings of the machines involved are missing. Apollo 11 data tapes containing telemetry and the high quality video (before scan conversion) of the first moonwalk are missing. Dr. David Williams (NASA archivist at Goddard Space Flight Center) and Apollo 11 flight director Gene Kranz both acknowledged that the Apollo 11 telemetry data tapes are missing. Bart Sibrel said "In my research at NASA I uncovered, deep in the archives, one mislabeled reel from the Apollo 11, first mission, to the Moon. What is on the reel and on the label are completely different. I suspect an editor put the wrong label on the tape 33 years ago and no reporter ever had the motive to be as thorough as I. It contains an hour of rare, unedited, color television footage that is dated by NASA's own atomic clock three days into the flight. Identified on camera are Neil Armstrong, Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin, and Michael Collins. They are doing multiple takes of a single shot of the mission, from which only about ten seconds was ever broadcast. Because I have uncovered the original unedited version, mistakenly not destroyed, the photography proves to be a clever forgery. Really! It means they did not walk on the Moon!" 5) The stars debate is an interesting one. Throughout those interview videos at Google, you will find it strangly odd that each astronaut has a different version of the star theory. Some say they were plain as day. Some say you couldn't even see them? What's the deal NASA? As with the photography, I will discuss that later. 6) "As for signs of a blast crater — why would there be? The lander did not take off at lightning speed, it gradually landed and gradually left." Seriously? This is a spacecraft we are talking about here that has high powered rockets hurdling it through space at speeds far exceeding any earth wehicle. The Lander weighed 17 tons and sat on top of the sand making no impression but directly next to it footprints can be seen in the sand. Upon take off, there were no flames coming out of the lunar module as shown in many NASA simulations. Now, for some more points to prove the hoax is correct. ***Photos from the moon: ~Crosshairs appear to be behind objects. ~Crosshairs are sometimes misplaced or rotated. ~The quality of the photographs is implausibly high. ~There are no stars in any of the photos. The Apollo 11 astronauts also claimed to have not remembered seeing any of the stars in a press conference after the event. ~The color and angle of shadows and light are inconsistent ~There appear to be "hot spots" in some photographs that look like a huge spotlight was used at a close distance. ~Footprints in the extraordinarily fine lunar dust, with no moisture or atmosphere or strong gravity, are unexpectedly well preserved, in the minds of some observers – as if made in wet sand. ***Radiation: ~The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt and galactic ambient radiation. The interviews on this topic are interesting as well. Some of the effects of radiation can be seen by closing ones eyes. A person would see "shooting stars" as the radiation passes through their body. The astronauts have varying stories on this issue. Several even said that they never passed through the Van Allen Belt, however, this must be passed when reaching the moon. ~Film in the cameras would have been fogged by this radiation. ***Transmissions: ~The lack of a more than two-second delay in two-way communications at a distance of a 250,000 miles (400,000 km). (this still isn't perfected 45 years later) ~The Parkes Observatory in Australia was billed to the world for weeks as the site that would be relaying communications from the Moon, then five hours before transmission they were told to stand down. ***Other points of interest: ~ Although Apollo 11 had made an almost embarrassingly imprecise landing well outside the designated target area, Apollo 12 succeeded, on November 19, 1969, in making a pin-point landing, within walking distance (less than 200 meters) of the Surveyor 3 probe, which had landed on the Moon in April 1967 ***Deaths of key personel who were involved with the Apollo missions: ~Ted Freeman (T-38 crash, 1964) ~Elliott See and Charlie Bassett (T-38 accident, 1966) ~Virgil Ivan "Gus" Grissom (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967). His son, Scott Grissom said the accident was a murder. ~Ed White (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967) ~Roger Chaffee (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967) ~Ed Givens (car accident, 1967) ~C. C. Williams (T-38 accident, October 1967) ~X-15 pilot Mike Adams (the only X-15 pilot killed during the X-15 flight test program in November 1967 - not a NASA astronaut, but had flown X-15 above 50 miles). ~Robert Lawrence, scheduled to be an Air Force Manned Orbiting Laboratory pilot who died in a jet crash in December 1967, shortly after reporting for duty to that (later canceled) program. ~NASA worker Thomas Baron (automobile collision with train, 1967 shortly after making accusations before Congress about the cause of the Apollo 1 fire, after which he was fired.) Ruled as suicide. Baron was a quality control inspector who wrote a report critical of the Apollo program and was an outspoken critic after the Apollo 1 fire. Baron and his family were killed. I have more isssues that can be used next.