Homosexuality is natural

As for the definition of natural. These shall be the definitions to work with.Natural:1. of, existing in, or produced by nature2. in accordance with human nature3. as is normal or to be expected; ordinary or logical4. not acquired and born with---Short history:The current definition that "homosexuality is unchangeable" was adopted after the Bowers v. Hardwick case where two people were charged with homosexuality, since all types of sodomy were criminalized.After the court rejected the argument of homosexuality as a fundamental privacy right, they decided to redefine it as a normal and unchangeable condition equal to heterosexuality which is independent of conduct. So if you practice it, no change have occurred to your true sexual orientation.First of all, lets ask yourself this question: Are homosexuals in the LGBT rights movement victims or challengers?The conditions for a party to gain the minority victim status are: have suffered a history of discrimination are powerless to help themselves are defined by immutable characteristics. The first and second conditions can't be incorporated to the LGBT movement. If it did then it is pretty much an insult to the civil rights movement.Were they forced into servitude?Were they denied medical treatment at a heterosexual only hospital?Were they segregated in schools, buses, restaurants, bathrooms, water fountains etc...Were they bought and sold a property?Were they hunted, captured decapitated or placed in zoos?So the first and second condition can not apply to homosexuality.But the one that matters is the third condition which you can see attempts at applying it today.There is one issue with the master plan though... They couldn't proved it.Scientifically this is absurd, we can not have a DNA test or blood test or any kind of medical test to prove someone's permanent homosexual or heterosexual status.So we must rely completely on someone's claim that his sexual orientation is innate, some may use the argument that no one would choose to be gay since it is social unacceptable, but the argument is false since that never stopped people in the past and there are many homosexuals who believe that it is a choice.If this was proved, then a race for the cure would have started already. But do the majority of homosexuals want a cure to be found? I am not sure about that.I would like you to please clarify in future rounds whether the foundation of the topic title is:1- Political lie2- ScientificAnd provide reason.I am not asking for a "List of proofs", I am asking about how the claim started in an 1980-1999 environment. I called the first choice "Political lie" since extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to exist. So in an other word: How did they know that people are born that way?---Philosophy:Legally, all acts of sex except rape are done voluntary with the agreement of both parties.I just fail to understand the magical force that causes people to have homosexual acts against their will. Did they experience an effect similar to Hypnosis for example? Were the people in bug chasing parties forced into sharing AIDS with each other by an unknown factor?Therefore, the excluding of the choice factor is illogical until it is scientifically proved that they have their hands tied.homosexuals are only distinguishable through their actions, thus it is behaviour based. Without show sexual orientation-based actions they are indistinguishable.Lets assume homosexuality is genetic for a minute, if someone had a "rape gene", we would not blame him for having it, but we won't accept that as an excuse for performing rape.*Note that the genetic theory is currently rejected since it is not possible*If such *insert action here* gene exists, then it is not going to force someone to perform an action.“There is little disagreement that male homosexual orientation is not a Mendelian trait. In fact, a priori, one would expect the role of a major gene in male homosexual orientation to be limited because of the strong selective pressures against such a gene. It is unlikely that a major gene underlying such a common trait could persist over time without an extraordinary counterbalancing mechanism.”Risch, Neil, Elizabeth Squires-Wheeler, and Bronya J.B. Keats (1993), “Male Sexual Orientation and Genetic Evidence,” Science, 262:2063-2064, December 24.“The search for the biological underpinnings of complex human traits has a sorry history of late. In recent years, researchers and the media have proclaimed the ‘discovery’ of genes linked to alcoholism and mental illness as well as to homosexuality. None of the claims… has been confirmed.”as quoted in Horgan, John, “Gay Genes, Revisited,” Scientific American, 273[5]:26, November, 1995.We are human beings, we are not cattle or robots. We have the gift of choice and logical thinking. So believing that hormones is going to cause a bpd is also absurd.The next factor is desire which obviously abundant. Just because desire excists does not mean it is justified, otherwise adultery, rape, murder etc... Are justified as well since the person wants it.Should the previous listed intentions be carried out or should the said person conquer them?I would like you to point in future rounds whether homosexuality is a desire that can be suppressed and eventually regulated. And point whether it is different than say, anger management or the desire to harm someone.If someone had pedophilia-based thoughts, They are expected to conquer these thoughts even if it is hard for them, and society have the right to stop it and regulate sexual acts.In a nut shell: Being a member of society, it means you suppress harmful desires or you get punished.Pedophiles prisoners are saying that they can't help it and are born this way, should we let them go then?In fact, pedophilia was a part of the early LGBT movement since one of their demands was to remove all the age of consent laws.Andrei Chikatilo, a Russian serial killer who killed 52-56 women and children said that he only feels sexually aroused after slashing them to death even after he attempted rape, and he couldn't help it since the desire overwhelmed him.There are unlimited possibilities for sexual orientation, and homosexuality is on the list. But that does not and never did give an official license for sexual conduct.An other important aspect in the formula is equalizing homosexuals and heterosexuals.However, when researching homosexual practices, it becomes quite clear that homosexuality is dangerous to the individual and partners, even without all the statistics.http://factsaboutyouth.com...One may say: Homosexuality spreads diseases, Heterosexuality does the same thing.However two wrongs does not prove one of them right.Would you be OK to ban all harmful sexual activities then? The answer would probably be no since homosexuality is based upon them.Heterosexuality is immutable.*Note: Excluding hermaphrodites*Males are born with male sexual parts. So they are definitely males.Females are born with female sexual parts. So theye definitely females.The productive system that ensures the survival of humankind is between a male and a female, thus heterosexuality is natural. Ultimately, we are one race with two genders, males and females, and for homosexuality to be equal to heterosexuality they must have their own physiology that fits in their sexual activities.Homosexuality is thus unnatural and an abnormality based on the conduct of same-sex relationship. In the end they are males or females. Biologically, they is no difference between homosexuals and the other paraphilias.My side of the argument requires not to have new information, it requires to clear the misconceptions and flawed logic.---In the next round, I shall focus on the scientific aspect.Thank you for reading.