Evolution is based on a Lie.

Unfortunately for us ALL, Con persists in lies ... Clearly Con was never QUALIFIED to accept this debate ... OBSERVE in the comments section FIRST COMMENTS BETWEEN Pro and Con. EVIDENCE Con KNEW ORIGINS OF HUMAN EVOLUTION was the topic! Pro will Show evolution is as False in every aspect WHEN IT COMES TO THE ORIGINS OF LIFE! You shall be shown clear indisputable evidence, that Science has conspired to submit conjectures, theories, and postulations as FACTS ... which IS in accordance with the textbook definition of a Lie! As stated below: That a LIE is ALSO the misrepresentation of facts BY mistaken impression .... or as I ACCURATELY CALLED IT INACCURATE DATA! definition: From oxforddictionary.com 1An intentionally false statement: 1.1Used with reference to a situation INVOLVING DECEPTION or FOUNDED on a MISTAKEN IMPRESSION: Rather than provide any kind of evidence, Con has submitted reports from science literature which when read ... revealed themselves nothing more than hypothesis. At no point in time, under ANY references provided by Con, was there a link provided where the READER, could witness OR observe the actual Living ORGANIC creature that purportedly emerged from an INORGANIC SOURCE! ZERO, ZILCH, NOTHING, NADA! Case in point .... the ENTIRETY of the debate Con has drawn sole attention to the Microscopic world. Citing THIS IS LIFE ... PROOF OF EVOLUTION! How sad! Who may I ask has DECLARED BEFORE THE WORLD ... THIS IS LIFE? Of COURSE, the SAME people who have ravaged your minds with pointless, unproved theories, hypothesis, conjectures, passing them ALL off as ..... dare I say it? ........ SOUND fact? Clearly Con doesn't KNOW the definition of FACT! Not a thing provided by con was REMOTELY INDISPUTABLE! When called upon to provide legitimate proof, of Evolution HE (Con) in DESPERATION throws out the very evidence that DISPROVED his evolution, without even realizing it! Isn't that exactly HOW evolutionist got suckered to BEGIN WITH! Closing their Minds to TRUTH, and grasping for anything that allows them to CONTINUE in the deception - that they can do whatever they want because they're not being held accountable? But that to is a lie! The worse kind of a LIE ... the LIE TO SELF! In Con's piteous and desperate attempt to distract readers by misdirection and camouflage! He grasp at the maggot! Uh,uh,uh Con? You CANNOT USE things that CAN ONLY BE FOUND IN LIVING ORGANISMS ..... which is exactly what evolution attempts to refute! EVOLUTION CLAIMS THAT LIFE CAME INTO BEING FROM THE INORGANIC MATTER ... not ORGANIC? ALL readers are aware .... or certainly SHOULD BE aware, that maggots only form from the decomposing bodies of the living, as the living cells BEGIN TO DIE.... I put it to you plainly .... WHEN HAVE YOU EVER SEEN MAGGOTS FORM from a rock, or dirt or concrete, or lime, or gravel ...... NEVER! They ONLY FORM when THE LIVING DIES. Second point ..... WHEN HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A microscopic MAGGOT form at the death of a single cell organism? NOT a MICROSCOPIC MAGGOT to be seen anywhere under the microscope! NOT ONE! WHY? Maggot- A soft-bodied legless larva of a fly or other insect, found in decaying matter: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com... FOUND IN DECAYING MATTER! if your NOT ALIVE YOU CANNOT DECAY, therefore NO MAGGOT! since they are completely ABSENT when a single or multicell dies in vitro Definition of in vitro in English: Biology - (Of a process) performed or taking place in a test tube, culture dish, or elsewhere outside a living organism: Did you get THAT? OUTSIDE A LIVING ORGANISM!!!!!!! therefore NOT LIVING! Despite Scientist general Consensus as to WHAT IS OR IS NOT LIFE, does NOT CONSTITUTE A FACT! Science simply cannot continue to GIVE definitions and then purposely CONTRADICT THEM when it suits their STUDIES! Definition: inorganic 1Not consisting of or deriving from living matter. 1.1Without organized physical structure. 2 Chemistry Relating to or denoting compounds which are not organic (broadly, compounds not containing carbon). DO I REALLY HAVE TO TELL YOU THERE WAS NO LIFE ON EARTH AT FIRST? SO the microscopic IS NOT LIFE, no matter who says it IS, cause it DOES NOT DECAY! Scientist CONTINUALLY contradict themselves, WHY mankind foolishly continues to place such credence on an obviously FLAWED system is beyong incredible .... but? Whatever. That 4 BILLION humans have gambled AND LOST their very Souls, on the patently absurd is beyond understanding! Still, there IS TIME! Life began instantly, supernaturally, it HAD too, there is simply NO other logical nor rationale way for life to have started. Continue to delude yourself if you wish. The EVIDENCE proves YOU ARE WRONG on life's beginnings, so you'd better figure something ELSE out and stop believing the incredible stupid! Evolution IS A LIE based on INACCURATE DATA, false information, false unproven theories passed as facts, hypothesis, without evidence of truth in even a single report! Data IS manipulated to agree with hypothesis and conjecture ... NOT the other way around!