It's probable that Palestine should it be created, will not be an enemy of israel

The burden of proof is on my opponent. Actually, I do believe all I have to do is prove that Palestine and Israel can be friends. Which, mind you, they have been many times in the past. I shall try my best.You still have given no evidence of your claims, either. You still have to submit absolute proof that all Palestinians would be the enemy of Israel. Because the Palestinians have always been enemies of the state of Israel. The words Palestinians and enemies are misnomers to a certain extent, at least in this perspective. Palestine did not exist at the time you are mentioning. Around the 1830s ARABS from the area, under British Rule were called Palestinian Arabs. To give you an example of how unofficial this really was in terms of an Arabic label, many Jews were called Palestinian Jews as well. The Israel Philharmonic Orchestra was founded as the Palestine Orchestra, and The Jerusalem Post newspaper was founded as the Palestine Post.That in and of itself is partial evidence for my stance. Albeit weak, it still brings up the point, who Palestinians really are. They could be anyone from that region, doesn't matter the creed or religion. Already 30 years before it's establishment they made pogroms where Jews were killed and wounded, and in the 1930s (as the time was getting closer) they killed hundreds of Jews and rioted all the time. While I can not argue the fact there were pogroms on Jewish settlers during this time. Specifically the Arab Riots - 1920-1921 and The Hebron Massacre-August 1929. We really should take a look at what was going on at that time in the area. There was the whole British rule thing (Jordan - Modern day Palestine). The start of Zionism, which pushed hard to work with Britain to take away the rights of the Arabs and ultimately was successful in many ways. All in all, around 1600 people died between both those pogroms.As for why these events had occurred? Well, I would have to think it had something to do with the deliberate and systematic occupation and deconstruction of their culture, by the zionist movements. Mind you, I don't agree with the zionist movement, nor wahhabism. To give you an example of "tit for tat" in the most obscure sense. Maybe The Palestinians are holding a grudge against the Israelis for massacring their own people countless times in ancient times. The military conquest of the land of Canaan by the Hebrews in about 1200 B.C.E. is often characterized as "genocide" and has all but become emblematic of biblical violence and intolerance.As you can see, Hebrews can be just as violent as Palestinians. And, those were all Palestinian region civilizations that they brought genocide upon. Yes, whole civilizations apparently. When the state of Israel was created, the Palestinians began a bloody war which took 6 months for the Jews to gain the upper hand. (After that, they had to win the war against all the invading armies). Britain was moving out at this time, and there was great uncertainty for both parties. There were skirmishes between both sides but the fact remains the war didn't really start till Egypt, Iraq and Syria attacked. They weren't there to help Palestine but rather there for their own accord and gain. Until this day they're society is full of hate towards Israel, based on all of this (and more) I say that the Palestinians have always been enemies to the state of Israel. Therefore I say that the BOD is on you to prove that if Israel would leave the west bank and let the Palestinian make a state, the status quo would change and it would not be an enemy of Israelis.That would honestly be speculation on my part. I can say this, though it is not the whole of Palestine that is enemies with the Whole of Israel and it's people. It is the zionist government and their "YAHOO" ways that they have a problem with. I am sure same goes for the good people of Israel and their thoughts not of the regular neighbors, cousins, but rather groups such as The Muslim Brotherhood and HEZBOLLAH. Maybe if state hood was granted, Palestine can start reliquinshing their ties to those groups because they, at that point, would have official protection from the U.N. Also, hopefully Israel wouldn't preemptively launch missiles at Palestine anymore. If they were granted statehood, Israel would be committing war crimes, if that were to occur. It also makes for better friends if one of you doesn't shoot ballistics into the other. The argument here is not whether the Jews had the right to create their state, whether the Arab hate is justified etc.I can't help but smile at this sentence, because if it was relevant to the debate you know they have justification.the point here is it probable that it will stop, if the Jews create Palestine (much better had to fix that)This is rather hard to prove but as for your case you haven't proven much either, just a pontification about Israel's human rights and Palestine's apparent lack of them. In the end, what we have is two factions trading blows over religious and ethnic issues. The only difference is, is that Israel has a really big BROTHER. The obvious point of the debate, although it's not the subject of the debate is, That if my argument is true, than any normal country cannot be expected to be the ones to create a state which will, in all likelihood be at war her.It is Israel that barged in and created another state where there already was one. Then they systematically subverted culture, commerce and overall basic human rights over the years.As for peace between the two countries? I think they will be OK. I looked to see if there were any peace seeking organizations on either side and was happy to see dozens of collaborative orgs trying to figure out some semblance of peace.On an ending note, I just want to bring up the fact of your choice of the words "enemy" and "Palestine" I will try to tackle that aspect in round two after rebutt.