The abrahamic god!!!

I'm an atheist, but I'll gladly play devils advocate against someone as intelligent and respectable as my opponent. (I'm not sure who the "retard boy" is you have such a curiously creepy obsession for, but I shall accept this debate and be... whatever the opposite of the statement "The Abrahamic God!!!" could be.) The website says, "It is important to check your grammar and spelling, otherwise you may be penalized by the voters." You rebel, you! My argument: Absolute truth must exist: There must be absolute truth. If you were to say there isn't absolute truth, that would be an absolute statement, which would contradict itself. Absolute knowledge must exist: If you know of ANYTHING to be true, than it is absolute knowledge. To say you don't think of anything to be true is both deceitful and an admission of absolute knowledge. Logic exists and is unchanging: Logic, described as valid reasoning, must exist for us to apply the rules of the universe consistently. It must be unchanging as nothing can ever challenge a perfectly logical conclusion. As a perfectly logical conclusion applies seamlessly with our laws of the universe, which we know to be unchanging. Logic cannot be made of matter: Matter changes, and if matter changes, it cannot possess within it the ability to uphold logic, as logic is absolute and unchanging. Logic is universal: No person can come to the conclusion that gravity doesn't apply to them, and it be true. In the same sense, following true logic, we must all come to the same universal conclusions logically, as it is an underlying force we cannot alter. Because Absolute truth, knowledge and logic exist: Unless one knows everything, or has revelation from someone who does (God), something we don't know could contradict what we think we know. If our thoughts are the mere by-products of the electrochemical processes in our evolved brains, you would not get "truth" you would get "brain-fizz." Chemicals do not produce "truth" they just react. As Doug Wilson said, it would be like shaking up a can of Mountain Dew, and a can of Dr. Pepper, opening them, and watching them fizz. Neither fizz is "true," they just are. For truth you need someone (God) who transcends the natural realm. Universal, immaterial, unchanging logic: For universal, immaterial, unchanging logic, you need someone (God) who is universal (Psalm 90:2), not made of matter (John 4:24) and unchanging (Malachi 3:6). Without God, who has universal knowledge, we could not know anything to be universally true. Without God, who is Spirit (not made of matter), we could not make sense of immaterial things. Without God who is unchanging (and logic is a reflection of the way He thinks), we would have no basis for expecting logic not to change. Without God, we couldn't truly know anything at the risk of discovering something outside of our knowledge, causing an upheaval. We couldn't say anything was true, because if there's not an ultimate truth to work towards, then we're just directionless energy. Nothing would be logical or follow any rules, because there's no ultimate logic behind the workings of our universe. As further evidence, proving that logic is immaterial could prove God. Just because something isn't physically testable, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There are a multitude of things in the universe we cannot observe or test that are existing just fine without us.