The Biblical God is Immoral

Pro perceived that we both believe in "objective morality", but to be clear, I do not. I do not see the world as black and white. Question: Is it immoral to allow a child to die when you could save him? The initial response could be "yes", but what if I then tell you that 1,000 children will die if the one lives? -- Pro says he is a Pantheist and believes in objective morality. Question: What if Pantheism is wrong? What is Pantheism? Pantheism is the belief that the Universe, or nature as the totality of everything, is identical with divinity,or that everything composes an all-encompassing, immanent god. Pantheists thus do not believe in a distinct personal or anthropomorphic god. In theory, within this "oneness", we have many beliefs that are contrary to Pro's version of objective morality. Throughout most of human history, Pro's version of objective morality would have been foreign to all of our forfathers. Nevertheless, we must, for the sake of fair debate face Pro's assessment with questions. 1) Why should we believe objective morality exists? 2)Are there ever acceptions? 3)If objective morality does exist, why should we accept Pro's version of objective morality? Why is it not your version? Why is not a voted on version? Why can't I create a version? Why is it not one of our grandchildren's version? 4)How does one prove their version of objective morality as being "correct"? -- Why is Saudi Arabia's version of morality not our source of objective morality? Islam takes "morality" so seriously that they actually have a "morality police". -The Mutaween in Saudi Arabia are tasked with enforcing Sharia as defined by the government, specifically by the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice. The Mutaween of the CPVPV consists of more than 3,500 officers in addition to thousands of volunteers, often accompanied by a police escort. They have the power to arrest unrelated males and females caught socializing, anyone engaged in homosexual behavior or prostitution; to enforce Islamic dress-codes, and store closures during the prayer time. They enforce Muslim dietary laws, prohibit the consumption or sale of alcoholic beverages and pork, and seize banned consumer products and media regarded as anti-Islamic (such as CDs/DVDs of various Western musical groups, television shows and film which has material contrary to Sharia law or Islam itself). https://en.m.wikipedia.org... -- Why is Islamic Law not our version of objective morality? -Under Islamic law, the crimes that carry defined penalties are murder, apostasy (rejection or desertion of Islam), adultery, fornication, homosexuality and theft. Interpretations of the law and punishments vary from state to state. Lesser offences might include debt, usury, alcohol and drug abuse, and use of pornography. The punishments range from flogging to cutting off of limbs, or even death. https://www.justlanded.com... -- Here is a short video on how white blood cells kill a parasitic worm. Are the white blood cells commiting an "immoral" act by killing the worm? Are doctors immoral if they don't prevent the white blood cells from killing the worm? Does the worm have the right to live? Do we "morally" have the right to allow the worm's death? It's a living creature just trying to get by isn't it? http://youtu.be... What if someone thinks the worm should die because it is like a cancer to the body, and will kill its host? Shall we not allow the white blood cells to kill it? Is it immoral to let the worm die seeing it is a living thing? -- Pro has forsaken one of the variables in this equation. This is that the Biblical account of God is that He is omniscient. To be omniscient meaning that He sees the future and knows all results from every angle possible. If you could see the future, you might come off as not only insane but somehow "wrong" to anyone who could not see the results. For example, if you were a time traveler from the future and wanted to prevent Hitler from burning people in ovens, you would go back to before he came into power, and you might kill him. Are you immoral? You just saved millions of lives and prevented mass torture and slaughter. It's subjective. It's semantics. Is killing someone immoral or not? It depends on who you ask and what the circumstance is. If you add the ability to see the future, you further complicate the issue. 1)If you could see the end result, and that result was beyond spectacular, are you immoral, if you allow extreme things to happen to get that result? 2)Are you immoral if you prevent the extreme things from happening but now we do not get the spectacular result? Here is a video of beings from the future telling us that there was no other way. It had to be exactly this way. These beings come back and tell us that nothing could have been different. http://youtu.be...