My DDO username is NiamC

Ok, let’s go. If I may say, you did not actually rebut any of my arguments, but only against my grammar. “To be honest, I didn't read your entire rebuttal because it is irrelevant. Your resolution stated in R1:” I didn’t make any rebuttals... If you meant my argument, then I’m afraid that you should have read it all, because it is relevant, despite what you say. I shall prove so later. “If one looks at where the comma is placed, the sentence itself suggests that your username is, is NiamC. You argued for the name NiamC, however, that is not your burden of proof. Your burden of proof is showing that your name is, is NiamC (including the second, "is."). “To clarify, you used the comma as a vocative case, because there is no other grammar rule that allows you to place a comma in that sentence. Preceding the comma, you state what your username is. Following the comma is the modifier of your preceding statement, which is your name, is NiamC. “ I see what you have done; you had almost convinced that I made a terrible grammar error, which would jeopardise my whole argument. But alas! You are wrong. Let me start by reiterating my resolution: “The resolution is that my username on this website (debate.org), is "NiamC".” You have used a semantics tactic to attack at my resolution, thus attempting to make me have changed my argument. You say that because of the comma, which preceded the “is”, I would have to argue that my username is, is NiamC (instead of just NiamC). You then provide evidence by posting a link to a website which explains about the use of commas and you then explain that a vocative case was used. To be sure on whether you were right about this or not. I decided to do some research of my own by consulting the internet and by asking some of my English teachers and friends. If you want proof, ask CJKallstar. https://owl.english.purdue.edu... I found out that my resolution would mean that I would have to argue that my username of DDO is in fact, NiamC. Not “Is NiamC”. I shall explain why. “The resolution is that my username on this website (debate.org), is "NiamC".” The fact that I had put a set of speech marks around NiamC e.g. “NiamC” would clearly indicate that the username would only be “NiamC” and not Is NiamC. Why else would I put speech marks around NiamC? Therefore, it would be obvious that I am implying that my username would only be NiamC. I had also used the comma before “is” as a clause separation and would therefore not be a vocative case. My argument Because I was able to refute my opponent’s rebuttals, I will use my arguments from the previous rounds (which were not rebutted at all). I will summarise my argument from the last round: 1) I was successfully able to show that my DDO username is NiamC logically. 2) To prove that “NiamC” was my actual argument, I provided evidence that the account with the User Id of NiamC was mine. For this I provided a screenshot. 3) To help prove that the account with the User Id of NiamC was mine, I provided a screenshot of an account verification email, proving that I am once again the only owner of the account with the user Id of NiamC. 4) I then provided evidence about why it would make sense for why my username for DDO to be NiamC- my name is Niam. I rest my case. Conclusion I would like to say that my opponent has only provided rebuttals aimed towards the grammar of my argument, and not towards the actual argument itself, which I think is quite a silly thing to do really. My opponent tried to use the tactics of Semantics (which is quite irritating and annoying for me), but I was able to refute and negate his rebuttals, which would once again validate my previous arguments. Because of this, I have fulfilled the BOP. I somewhat enjoyed this debate, and I thank my opponent for this. Vote NiamC