The European Union should be abolished

Rebuttal to your childish claims and accusations:"I'd like to start by reminding you that I'm British so sarcasm is inevitable." - Wow! Are you a child? Bring professionalism into yourdebates. And, if you really believe in this statement, then consider your conduct points gone."Using emotive language is a key part of writing to argue and persuasive writing. Debate is not just facts, figures, stats and pure boredom. Debate is about passion, emotion, belief, determination." - That actually had me, but you are at an imbalance; you write with only emotion, yet there needs to be some facts. So, my point still stands that you have absolutely no argument throughout this debate. "I also find it hilarious that Pro says I should improve on my spelling and grammar when he himself spells the word 'cite' as 'site'. - Yes, careless of me, but please improve your sense of humor and revise you own arguments briefly. For Example: You cannot end sentences with linking verbs as I learned in first grade. (I have a passion for, I am made emotional by, I have a belief in and I am determined to see prosper my Europe, my continent. THAT is debate and for Pro to suggest otherwise shows he really has no idea what the true meaning of debate is.)You should use is with singular nouns (Very simple debating skills that are necessary to use DDO.) and ( a strong minority are not) - I know that might be tough, after all I learned that in grade 3"Pro also stated that my arguments amounted to nothing, but this is rich coming from someone who decided to copy and paste a quote from a website, then follow it with a series of ad hominem attacks."- You are still not realizing the point: I have sited reliable sources and facts where all your information is coming from your heart. You tell me how to debate the 'right' way when your debate doesn't even amount to a debate. You are disgracing debates when all you do is accuse me and not even stay on your topic. My fellow debater you are taking this too personally and need to remain focus on the task at hand.Also, the euro zone is an outcome of the European Union, so please research more about your own continent. You have wasted my time and simply upset me by not producing an actual EU argument to oppose.My Arguments: 1. The EU costs the UK £6.4bn. - wasn't the purpose of the EU to benefit the countries economically.2. You said that the free movement of people was good but actually, Free Movement of Labour has caused problems of overcrowding in UK cities. The UK’s population is set to rise to 70 million over next decade, partly due to immigration. This has pushed up house prices and led to congestion on roads. 3. More bureaucracy less democracy. 4. Loss of autonomy - countries no longer has total control over their laws and economic policy5. Inefficiency and corruption. There have been examples of money being wasted in the complicated bureaucracy that makes up the EU (1-3:http://www.economicshelp.org..., , 4-5: http://www.modernstudies.org.uk...) Conclusion: A. You failed to produce any argument because you don't cite any sourcesB. Your conduct was poor due to your sarcasm and taking the debate to apersonal level.C. I produced a plethora of arguments that you failed to argue against.D. The whole debate you attacked me not my debateE. You are only supporting your side of the debate because you are a EuropeanyourselfF. EU has become a type of socialism because a few wealthy countries are payingfor the many poor countriesG. A very poor debate from Con Vote for my cause and my belief not just for the points, but because of the right cause and the rude behavior of con.