Atheism is more probable than Christianity

As I figured, Pro has put himself at a great disadvantage because now most of my arguments will be left unchallenged. May the voters vote wisely! Pro said, "Also, this solution is rather awkward. It would be like saying that Neil Armstrong landed on the moon in the days of President Ronald Regan. Although Ronald Regan was alive at that time, the reading would be highly awkward." While the reading may appear awkward, it still doesn't mean it was a contradiction. Further, its quite obvious that Abiathar DID BECOME THE HIGH PRIEST AFTER AHIMELECH DIED. Since Jesus knew the scriptures, its quite possible that he referred to Abiathar since Ahimelech was executed. Pro said, "Also, I point out that it was lawful for David to eat the bread—which my opponent did not refute." No, it was not lawful. In the Book of Exodus, only the priests could eat the Showbread. Christ confirms this in the verse my opponent mentioned. Its never right to do wrong(even if it was to save a life). God killed a man for trying to keep the Ark from falling off a cart(2 Samuel 6:7). Even though it seemed right, no man was supposed to touch the Ark, even if it was going to fall. God did not approve of David eating the shewbread, thus it was not lawful. Pro said, "My opponent misses the point entirely. The time where the events began happening "eutheōs" in the Gospel of Mark was in the very first chapter with Jesus' Baptism! Obviously, my opponent missed the point entirely!" No, I didn't miss the point. But how can my opponent prove that there wasn't a time element of years between the events happening in the Gospel of Mark. Yes, Jesus' death was fast, but there are not that many chapters in the Gospel of Mark. How do we know a year or too didn't occur between the events of Chapter 1 and chapter 5? Or chapter 3 and chapter 6? My opponent does not give the text the benefit of the doubt. Pro said, "Sorry, but it appears that Moses wrote the book of Genesis – not multiple authors. I'll concede; however, that if the Torah was written long after Moses,[2] then it is entirely possible for him to write about the City of Dan. However, doing so contradicts Jewish and Christian tradition which has Moses as the author of Genesis-Deuteronomy. Jesus Himself held to the view that the Law (in this case, including Genesis) were given by Moses." Biblical tradition doesn't mean there right. Yes I believe Moses wrote the Pentateuch, but Joshua could have added some things. You cant prove that wrong. Consider this verse from Joshua 24:26: "And Joshua wrote these words in the BOOK OF THE LAW of God, and took a great stone, and set it up there under an oak, that was by the sanctuary of the LORD." Notice Joshua wrote in the law. If the Law was what Moses wrote, then Joshua added to it! Pro said, "My opponent is correct in asserting that Missionaries began in Acts. However, my opponent misses my point. Why would God wait so long to begin reaching people to believe in Him?" He didn't wait long. There are thousands of Missionaries in the world. The kings of the East(Matthew 2) knew to follow the star that led them to Jesus. These kings were from the Eastern World. The Ethiopian Eunuch of Acts 8 told everyone in Ethiopia what happened to him. David Lvingstone of the 1800s said the Africans knew God had a Son that died and rose again because they watched the sunset and sunrise everyday. How does my opponent know that 2 billion people dont have access to the Gospel. Missionaries risk their lives in North Korea and Iran to get out the truth. There are underground churches in China. Just because an "official" statistic says that, doesn't mean the Gospel isn't being slipped in under the radar. Pro said, "I am out of room. However, I can defend one of my rebuttals: namely, the fact that my opponent makes a false analogy between evolution and atheism. My opponent, instead of responding to the fact that evolution does not equate to atheism and that atheism does not (and never has) depended upon evolution, he instead shouts the same answer. Hint: You don't defend "A" by shouting "A"!" Every atheist I have ever run across, believes evolution holds the key to understanding the origins of life, and that evolution is strong evidence God does not exist. That's what I've run across and I know that has to be the majority. Concerning Ananus and Cephas, wikipedia is not a reliable source to go to. Any public school teacher finds it untrustworthy. Furthermore, concerning the ephod, Judges 17:5 is about an IDOLATROUS MAN NAMED MICAH who made an ephod. God did not approve of such business. The man was a sinner!