Contender chooses topic (Video Games)

Rebuttals/Some Arguments ==================== 1. Multiplayer Pro says the fact that COD ghosts has more game modes does not matter, it depends on the market, but I believe it does. Tired of playing the same competitive Team Deathmatch or Bomb Defusal? Call of duty has many game modes for people at parties to play. As you can see, some of these modes in COD don't have a lot competitive value, but they are lots of fun. It gives a break from the gritty, serious type play that some modes possess, and ALL of CS:GO's game modes are serious, no fun party mode. This makes COD more of a party game and makes the game more fun multiplayer wise. Pro also makes the point that Call of Duty Ghost's maps are too confusing. Yes, the maps are big, but they compliment the Call of Duty setting. Being in a big map makes the setting, a battlefield in a war, much more intriguing. It feels like you are actually in a big battlefield in the middle of war, with gunshots everywhere. Counter Strike's setting is counter terrorism, not a war. So it's natural for the maps to be smaller. Have you heard of updates? Call of Duty Ghosts gets updates, not to make you frustrated, but to fix bugs. So Pro's argument about Counter Strike's bugs getting fixed, while COD's don't, disproved. 2. Cheating Pro argues that CS:GO has less hackers. While that is true to some degree, Pro concedes the point that COD hackers do get caught, so this disproves his point that CS:GO hackers get caught. Also, he brings up the point that you may get placed in a game with a hacker, and that takes the fun out of the game. Let me introduce you to the "exit" button, of you get into a game with a hacker, just simply exit the game and join a new one. While this also applies to CS:GO, I have countered his argument. 3. Innovation This argument basically consists of why CS had better graphics then COD. He shows 2 pictures, one from CS:GO and one from COD ghosts, he says that CS has better graphics. Well, I disagree. Look at [1](CS:GO) and [2](COD Ghosts), in my opinion (comparing graphics is hard not to be biased) COD wins. Look at the in game screen shot, it is highly detailed and look at the render distance, beautiful. We can't say much more on innovation on this, since both series don't innovate all that much. ================= Now for my own arguments ================= 1. Multiplayer COD Ghosts has a much more appealing multiplayer than CS:GO, here's why. First of all, COD Ghosts is on console, which is known for it's local multiplayer. Multiplayer is much more enjoyable with friends, and all you have to do is have your friends come over and just give them a controller. While on PC, everyone needs a computer, everyone has to bring a computer, and you need a powerful machine just to RUN CS. Also, I stated this earlier, COD has a wide variety of game modes, and very unique and fun ones that ARENT serious and competitive. Some examples of this are Cranked, and Infected. Plus, there's also a bomb defuse mode, which mirrors CS, so it isn't exclusive to CS. In addition, the maps are larger and it's fun to have that sense of immersions, compared to the cramped spaces of CS. 2. Single Player Campaign While FPS campaigns are usually short, COD actually has a campaign, while CS doesn't. COD's campaign has a story and has some pretty enjoyable missions to keep you playing and enhance the experience of the game, while CS just doesn't have a campaign. ================== Sources: [1]: . http://xboxoz360.files.wordpress.com... [2]: . http://www.dsogaming.com...