The republican house has not voted in favor of more than 2 bills that are benifiical to the USA

1) False fears of the mushrooming debt? anyone who has seen our national debt recently would be fearful of the fact that our debt is accelerating at a larger rate than ever before... Had they suck to the status quo they would have raised the debt ceiling and our debt would continue to grow unchecked but they brought attention to the mushrooming debt which brought about a compromise and committed a committee to look for future budget cuts in the future to also fight against the enlarging debt. 2) a) If there were already a recession then job losses would already be occurring, thats kind of what happens in a recession. Government spending would still be possible, but on a far more limited scale, and that would force Congress to think carefully about where they would spend money. The inability for Congress to spend enormous amounts of money during a recession would not trigger job losses like you suggest. b) wheres b? c) Those countries are limited on how much they spend because of their involvement in the EU. Their overspending is doing quite a bit of damage to the Euro so countries within the EU are pressuring these nations to stop spending for the sake of the CONTINENT. d) both your sources only show how medicare spending is projected to grow, but they also show why reducing and fighting the deficit is important, -Large budget deficits would reduce national saving, leading to higher interest rates, more borrowing from abroad, and less domestic investment--which in turn would lower income growth in the United States. -Growing debt would also reduce lawmakers' ability to respond to economic downturns and other challenges. -Over time, higher debt would increase the probability of a fiscal crisis in which investors would lose confidence in the government's ability to manage its budget, and the government would be forced to pay much more to borrow money. http://www.cbo.gov... e) I gave 3 sources proving that Social Security would not be cut..... f) This assumption is based on one website that actually doesnt give any facts that support such a claim. It just says that and does not provide any hard evidence or even any numbers to show how this would occur. 3) The Hyde amendment does this but must be enforced by an executive order meaning the president can choose to enforce it or not. This law makes it permanent so that in the future it would be impossible for tax dollars to fund abortions. As for the benefit, many Americans are opposed to abortion so a law that bans the government from using their taxes to fund abortions would be beneficial to those taxpayers who are against abortion. 4) Ill drop this one but here are other bills that have passed the Republican house, "Combating Autism Reauthorization Act of 2011" - Act to continue funding research for a cure to Autism "Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act" - pretty self-explanatory "Surface and Air Transportation Programs Extension Act of 2011" - extend the funding of transportation systems in the US "HR 2715" - grants greater authority to the Consumer Product Safety Commission "Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011" - provides government aid to the maintenance of highways http://www.congress-summary.com... Those were just 5 passed laws of many, many other laws the Republican controlled House of Representatives has passed....