Dictatorship is much better than than democracy.

Rebutalls: Good job in fitting in one decent dictator to counter possibly the worst political figure of all time, though this doesn't prove in any way that dictatorship is a must better form of government that democracy. You said: "My first argument is dictatorship can create a stable condition in the country. It is one of the best ways to defeat rebellions. You know, all rebellions are not right." Yes, ruling with an iron fist is a great way to kill your own people. I would like to note that revolts are: to act in a way that shows that you do not accept the control or influence of someone or something. [1] Rebellions are acts aimed at altering an established authority. [2] They occur due to poor leadership making the people unhappy, as with our prime example of a dictator (Adolf Hitler) and the vast majority of dictators they force their will upon the citizens who have no choice but to serve the will of the dictator. Hitler did this making it illegal for jews (his main opposition) to carry guns. [3] (also making him or any other Nazi hard to assassinate.) Thanks to this ability to have complete unchecked power, the dictator can do whatever he/she wishes so hitler (our prime example) decided to kill millions of minorities because they he felt they were "imperfect" in what is now called the Holocaust. [4] [5] Arguments So now that we have a prime example of a dictator let's apply this to a prime country, the United States of America (The world's greatest superpower). The U.S. is a great place ruled under democracy, where even the founding occur to guarantee basic civil right. [6] First of all, under a dictatorship these rights all people deserve would be removed, and the U.S. citizens would be forced to serve under the will of an unchecked master but when democracy rules checks and balances are made to make sure one person doesn't have complete authority over all. [7] [8] You may wonder how bad could unchecked power in the U.S. could possibly be, let's dive into it now. Here are some statistics from globalfirepower about the U.S. [9] MANPOWER Total Population: 316,668,567 Available Manpower: 145,212,012 Fit for Service: 120,022,084 Reaching Military Age Annually: 4,217,412 Active Frontline Personnel: 1,430,000 Active Reserve Personnel: 850,880 LAND SYSTEMS Tanks: 8,325 Armored Fighting Vehicles: 25,782 Self-Propelled Guns: 1,934 Towed Artillery Pieces: 1,791 Rocket Projectors (MLRS): 1,330 AIR POWER Total Aircraft: 13,683 Helicopters: 6,012 NAVAL POWER Aircraft Carriers: 10 Frigates: 15 Destroyers: 62 Submarines: 72 RESOURCES Oil Production: 8,500,000 bbl/day Oil Consumption: 19,000,000 bbl/day Proven Oil Reserves: 20,680,000,000 bbl/day FINANCIAL (in USD) Defense Budget: $612,500,000,000 Reserves of Foreign Exchange and Gold: $150,200,000,000 Purchasing Power Parity: $15,940,000,000,000 GEOGRAPHY (in km) Square Land Area: 9,826,675 km Coastline: 19,924 km Waterways: 41,009 km Wait, this is just the tip of the iceberg, let's move onto some Nuclear Warhead facts and statistics. 1. If 100 Hiroshima-sized nuclear bombs were detonated then the smoke would block out sunlight, cool the planet, and produce climate change unprecedented in recorded human history [10] 2. In Hiroshima the estimated death total from one nuclear bomb is 330,000. [11] [12] 3. In Nagasaki the estimated death total from one nuclear bomb is 250,000. [11] [12] 4. The United States currently the U.S. has 7,700 nuclear warheads. [13] 5. The U.S. has nuclear warheads over 600 times stronger than the one detonated over Hiroshima. [14] So I have presented an example with a prime dictator and given him a prime nation to lead, you can conclude what you think the dictator would do and whether or not that would be much better than rule under democracy however the power would almost surely use the incredible power the U.S. holds to commit the largest genocide in the history of humanity. Democracy has sucsessfully governed the U.S. and never been abused by one leader in pursuit of a nuclear war despite having over 7,700 nuclear warheads. To conclude, in the event of a dictator you must follow any orders and an eventual nuclear war caused by the intentions of one person would be possible while under democracy debate occurs and the cost-benefit analysis wins typically making the majority satisfied while dictatorship meets the desires of one person for the good of only one person. Sources: [1] http://www.merriam-webster.com... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org... [3] http://en.wikipedia.org... [4] http://www.deathcamps.info... [5] http://history1900s.about.com... [6] http://www.law.cornell.edu... [7] http://www.factmonster.com... [8] http://americanhistory.about.com... [9] http://www.globalfirepower.com... [10] http://content.time.com... [11] http://www.aasc.ucla.edu... [12] http://k1project.org... [13] http://www.fas.org... [14] http://www.dailymail.co.uk...