Overpopulation

A FF, I shall carry on with another set of arguments for fun!Food Supply.If everyone ate around average (2lb a day) than it would take 2,584,400,000 tons to feed them.That's good, because the world produces up to 4,000,000,000 tons of food.(a)a) http://www.theguardian.com......We could feed 11,000,000,000 people. The UN doesn't think we'll reach that many by the end of TWO century from now (start of 2300). (b) This is good because you can feed that many people with just the land we are using for farms. Another good thing is that most city and town expansions do not intrude on the farm land we use. Most farmers in the world aren't using up-to-date technology either.b) http://www.un.org...... P.g. 27The UN's High Estimate is merely an extreme assumption. They stick with the Medium Assumption.It's important to remember that as population grows, so does farming technology and the number of farmers.ANOTHER factor... Arable Land.They believe 10.43% of all land is Arable.(c) Of all that land, they estimate only 37.5% of all Arable land is being used.(d) This means we could increase our population to 266.6% before needing a new way of farming (or better Technology, you have to remember that as time goes by, and number of people one acre can feed increases.) This is assuming we still throw away half our food. If we stopped throwing away so much food, we could increase our population to 514%. Of course some of that land is likely being used... But how much?c) https://www.cia.gov......d) http://data.worldbank.org......No more than 30%. You see, Urbanized areas (Cities, Towns, Villages) take up 3% of Earth's land...(e,f) If all of the Urban Areas was, by some odd chance, on Arable land, it would cover 28.76% of all Arable Land. Leaving 33.74% left open. This means you could still almost double the population (assuming technology doesn't increase and Urbanization growth doesn't take up more Arable land.) Of course it's highly unlikely urban areas take up that much Arable Land. In fact, the 10.43% of the land that's Arable might exclude urban land, but I'm not sure.e) http://www.livescience.com......f) http://www.earth.columbia.edu......To put this into realization for you... Off of open Arable Land, we could hold a population from... (I'm posting the year the UN's High Estimate believe we will reach this number.)2175 = 18,888,660,000 (if we wasted half of our food still.)2300 = 36,538,000,000 (if we used all our food by then)Again, the dates are based on UN High Estimate, and the population is assuming we are using the same technology. It also assumes the same portion of Farmers are using up-to-date technology. Under the UN's actual estimate, we won't reach that number until LONG after 2300, if ever.By the way, some say it would take 10 earth's to sustain life if everyone were like Americans. I did the math... It'd take us not throwing away half our food, and increasing farming to 140%. Does that seem like a lot? To an extant... But that increase would leave Earth with 47.5% of it's Arable land left. That is far from needing 10 Earths... In fact, if each earth had the same amount of Arable land, it'd take 4.75% of that much land to feed everyone the same amount Americans eat.(g) We could still double+ our population.Current Food Production = Around 5 bn tons.Production need to eat like Americans = 7 bn tons.g) http://www.npr.org......Of course, not everyone eats like an American, and America's eating problem is fixable. Only when you can't fix the problems, have Human begun to overpopulate.With this, I conclude my prior statement.