Quality innovate unity

I don't understand why my opponent forfeited the golden chance of elaborating his opinion in this round. If my opponent was going to be busy in these days of debate then he should not have accepted the challenge! Why is my opponent not loyal to debate and its rule??? Any way...This is last round and here I will not put any new argument but conclude up the topic...I hope my opponent will at least respond in this round... Do you know? A fashionable idea in technical circles is that quantity not only turns into quality at some extreme of scale, but also does so according to principles we already understand. A million, or perhaps a billion, fragmentary insults will eventually yield wisdom that surpasses that of any well-thought-out essay, so long as sophisticated secret statistical algorithms recombine the fragments. This fact automatically supports me. According to this fact, Quantity (unity) as a whole may give birth to a quality that is may innovate quality. This is exactly inverse of the topic! Not quality innovate unity but unity innovate quality!!! For example: The united spare parts working efficiently results or innovate quality of the same machine or car in which they are fixed. So united and efficient working of each spare part determined quality of a machine as a whole! SO UNITY MAY INNOVATE QUALITY BUT QUALITY NEVER INNOVATE UNITY! Thus, In a nutshell... 1. Quality never innovate unity but retain it. 2. The root cause behind unity is ideology and need of something or someone. (One might have heard a saying that two enemies also unite sometimes to defeat some other. Unity occurs even in enemies when the need and goal is same...where quality plays role here?) 3. Unity may innovate quality yet quality never innovate unity... Following are the quotes which support my opinion directly or indirectly: a) "We are all equal in the fact that we are all different. We are all the same in the fact that we will never be the same. We are united by the reality that all colours and all cultures are distinct & individual. We are harmonious in the reality that we are all held to this earth by the same gravity. We don't share blood, but we share the air that keeps us alive. I will not blind myself and say that my black brother is not different from me. I will not blind myself and say that my brown sister is not different from me. But my black brother is he as much as I am me. But my brown sister is she as much as I am me." ― C. JoyBell C. b)"Equality is not a concept. It's not something we should be striving for. It's a necessity. Equality is like gravity. We need it to stand on this earth as men and women, and the misogyny that is in every culture is not a true part of the human condition. It is life out of balance, and that imbalance is sucking something out of the soul of every man and woman who's confronted with it. We need equality." ― Joss Whedon Both the quotes indirectly oppose the topic and support me. In quote (a) We are united and equal though quality of each is different. We say this as unity in diversity. So diverse qualities unite for a reason but the reason for this unification is of course not the quality. In quote (b) It is described that equality will be achieved when there will be balance from both side yet presently there is imbalance in every culture which resist unity. So the point is every culture has its own quality commandments, rules, advices and even qualitative ideal person like Jesus, Lord Krishna, Buddha etc..yet SUCH QUALITIES STILL NOT ABLE TO UNITE THE WORLD! SO QUALITY CANNOT INNOVATE UNITY... From my side I have concluded my arguments and opinion to the best of my knowledge with examples and incidents..I hope my opponent will respect the rules of a debate and reply in this last round...