The USSR played a more important role in defeating Germany than the western allies.

"Ye your twisting my sentences again. When you quote sometimes you only quote half of my idea and leave the other half out" Every word you say is part of your argument in this debate. Thus, it is logical for me to counter those words. That's what debating is. I will format my argument in this round the same way as Pro did. If I may point out that you may not be awarded conduct, pro, for your rude behavior. It is highly unneeded. "These were my four main arguments and I will simply copy and paste them because it seems that you completely avoided them." If I completely avoided them, how has this debate gone on for five rounds? Answer that. ___________________________________________________I. Resistance of Attacked Countries Germany invaded/attacked many countries, and without the resistance efforts of these countries, the Soviets could've considered them beaten. If you want examples of resistance, think of Poland, Greece, certain Czech and Albanian groups, and Free France. Without these countries, the Germans would have advanced into the Soviet Union and conquered more parts. I'm not sure if Poland, Greece, and the others (except for Free France) are considered western allies, but they alone can be argued to have put more effort and have played a more important role in defeating the Germans than the Soviets did. And we all know that the western allies played a way more important role than these mentioned countries.II. Hitler's Suicide If it was just the Soviet Union warring with Germany, Hitler wouldn't have killed himself. And we all know that Hitler's suicide had effectively ended German involvement in the war. Hitler knew he was losing. He knew ever since his ally, Japan, made the incredibly stupid decision to attack the USA. With the USA, UK, and the SU against him, only an idiot would have the mind to think he could still win. I give Hitler props for giving up. He had the right mind to know he had to give up, so he did. He wouldn't never have given up without the western allies. This is the only props I will ever give that man, and that is definitely saying something. III. The Soviet Union missed out on major battles There were many war-changing battles that the Soviet Union was not part of. I will list those that were against Germany, as that is what this debate is about.-Battle of the Bulge (Allies: US, UK, Canada, Belgium, Luxembourg, France. Axis: Germany).-Battle of France (Allies: France, Belgium, UK, Netherlands, Canada, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Luxembourg. Axis: Germany and Italy).-Battle of Britain (Allies: UK, Poland, Czechoslovakia, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada. Axis: Germany and Italy).-Normandy Landings (Allies: UK, US, Free France, Canada, Poland, Norway, Australia, New Zealand, Netherlands, Belgium, Czechoslovakia and Greece. Axis: Germany).-Battle of the Atlantic (Allies: UK, Canada, US, Newfoundland, Denmark, Norway, Poland, Free France, Belgium, Brazil, and Netherlands. Axis: Germany and Italy). You see, these battles were very, very, important. And the Soviet Union did not participate in any of them. Not even D-Day (Normandy Landings). IV. Superpower! After WWII, the USA became a Superpower of the world, and had proved to have the best military. And they were a western ally. This may seem like a weak point, but being a WORLD superpower is a very hard thing to do and keep stable. It is obviously brutally hard to earn this status, and the USA did that because of their important role in WW2. And they were just ONE western ally. _____________________________________________________________________________CONCLUSION: Overall, the western allies fought harder and played a more important role in defeating Germany than the Soviets did. It may not seem so, but when you look at the supplies and sacrifice the western allies put into WWII, it becomes evident that they were more important than the Soviet Union. What if Italy never declared war on Germany? Italy is very close to Germany, and without their cooperation as an Allied power, the Russians might be speaking German. But it's obviously not only Italy's efforts, because I'm not even sure if they were considered a western ally. You need to realize the damage that the western allies did to Germany. Especially the USA and the UK. Canada and Australia were even important. Not to mention the other about 30 countries that fought for the Allies. You mean to tell me that one country played a more important role than some of the world's deadliest militaries, and some of the world's proven superpowers? Well you are wrong, and I hope the voters agree. To also include I must adress your rude behavior. You seem to have referred to me as an idiot multiple times, and rudely say that I avoided your arguments. This is not how you debate. Behavior like this will not award you conduct points. I know my behavior was somewhat questionable at certain points, but it was obvious I was joking. You were just being flat-out rude._____________________________________________"Also I do not understand why you are talking about Japan at all." I mentioned Japan because they were most active in the Pacific theater, and that theater was more important to the outcome of WW2.________________________________ "That is what this debate is about and most of your arguments are entirely nonsense." What the heck? My arguments were based on thorough research I did, and years of studying WW2."If you win this debate then it would only be because the people who will vote here are not from Eastern Europe." Again, why so rude? And of course you think that, your username is STALIN.With my final points given and a rather adventurous debate, I must say this:VOTE CON!!! He has cookies.