The Bible Is Inerrent

Been busy on vacation so I'm sorry for the huge delay. I hope I can get all of this in.Contention one: FirmamentMy opponent uses the dictionary.org definition. However, firmament in Hebrew does not mean the same thing on dictionary.org and thus your argument fails.I shown you how the Hebrews understood the Earth to be and you have not yet refuted that.Contention 1.2: Flat Earth Cosmologyi applaud my opponent for the use of this verse; however, i do believe that this verse has no errors associated with its wording or meaning. To properly understand this verse, we must look at it in an idealistic manner. This verse is not describing the earth's geometric shape but rather describing the role of God .This verse describes humans as grasshoppers and as we all know, we are noting like grasshoppers. In this same way, we can view the tent as the earth providing shelter for us and God who sits above us guiding and watching us. (camping trip) Tent: shelter, Grasshoppers: human, God: guidance/ plays the role of the guardian.Here are the verses above it Do you not know, have you not heard has it not been told to you from the beginning? Do you not understand the foundations of the earth? 22. It is He Who sits above the circle of the earth, and whose inhabitants are like grasshoppers, who stretches out the heaven like a curtain, and He spread them out like a tent to dwell. obviously the earth does not have foundations and it is talking about the geometrics of the earth. I use this because CARM.org uses this as "scientific accuracies" but concedes it may be talking about a flat earth."This may or may not be construed to support the spherical shape of the earth. The horizon is a circle and a circle is flat." [1]Contention Two: Failed prophecies.Sub point: Tyre and EgyptMy opponent does not seem to understand that it was not Nebuchadnezzar that destroyed Tyre, but Egypt. In the words of Rejection of Pascal's wager [2]. My opponent's argument is that the modern city of Tyre is not the old city of Tyre since the former was not on the exact location of the latter. Suffice to say that no one agrees with such a twisted method to fulfil prophecy. Furthermore the prophecy says that Tyre shall never be rebuilt after the destruction by Nebuchadnezzar-which never happened-since he never destroyed the city. Even after the destruction by Alexander the Great, the city was still rebuilt. In fact the city of Tyre was even referred to, by that name, in the New Testament (Mark 7:24, Acts 12:20). Tyre exists to this day and has a population of about 12,000. Having failed in one prophecy did not make Ezekiel shy about making more: Ezekiel 29:8-12...thus says the Lord God..and the land of Egypt shall be a desolation and a waste...no foot of man shall pass through it and no foot of beast shall past through it; it shall be uninhabited for forty years. And I will make the city of Egypt a desolation in the midst of desolated countries; and her cities shall be desolated forty years... I will scatter Egyptian among the nations, and disperse them through the countries. This passage must take the cake for the most prophecies proven wrong! Egypt has never been desolate and waste. Men and people have always walked through it. There has never been a single moment (let alone forty years) when Egypt was uninhabited. Egypt has never been a desolated countries surrounded by more desolated countries. Its cities has never been desolated for any period of time and finally there was no Egyptian diaspora Due to the amount of time I had, I am sorry for the copy+paste, otherwise this would not have been so. I do wish to apologise.Did Michal have Children?The AV hides the contradiction by wrong wording. The translation my opponent uses or keeps the actual translation vague. The correctly as "borne." [3] ___________________________________________________________________________________[1] http://carm.org...[2] http://rejectionofpascalswager.net...[3] http://rejectionofpascalswager.net...