9/11 must have been assisted by the US government

.. .. .. .When your not given answers to your questions about 911 by the people who SHOULD be able to do so,it is PERFECTLY normal to ask questions. If our goverment has answers to questions about 911 why have they not yet given the answers to squash the debate ? When you are told 2+2=5 do you not question that ? Einstein said: "The important thing is not to stop questioning. "My unanswered questions:(1)Cheney in an interview with Tim Russert on NBC indicated that the President made the decision that day to scramble fighter jets. [1]Tim Russert: "What's the most important decision you think he (President Bush) made during the course of the day? " VP Cheney: "Well, the, I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft . .. We decided to do it. " So clearly the communications were not down on the morning of 911 as my opponent stated. (2)Staff members and commissioners of the 911 panel concluded that the pentagons initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks were part of a deliberate effort to mislead the 911 commission . [2] Why would they do that ? (3)An article detailing Flight 93's last minutes was available at dailynews. yahoo. com on 911. It did not fit the official story of the last moments of Flight 93 and rapidly disappeared from news websites but it can still be found on web archives. [3] Odd. (4)and(5) 7 of the hijackers said to be on the planes are still alive[4]. The original flight manifests used in the Moussaoui trial can be seen here[5]. (6) Mayor Giuliani sent WTC rubble to China and India to avoid testing for explosives. (7) The US goverment had tracked Bin Laden since about 1998 after truck bomb explosions at US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Bin Laden was added to FBI's "10 most wanted fugitives" list. Then 9 months prior to 911 the task force was dissolved[7] How convenient. WTC collapse:(1)My opponent seems to enjoy to attack me rather than just answer my questions very disrespectful I must say. With that being said he is mistaken jet fuel was not burning in the building. Office debris was. Office debris that is fire coded for a 110 story skyscraper which reads non-flammable. Jet fuel burns about 1000-5000lbs per hour depending on airframes, powerplant, weight etc. And thats in a controlled environment with jet fuel being fed into the engine. Jet fuel is refined kerosene. Airliners use Jet A kerosene and the military uses JP 4 kerosene. Regardless neither grade burns hot if it did it would alter the inside of a jet engine and cause failure. Imagine you light it ALL on fire all at once. .. its gone. So my opponents argument of jet fuel burn temps is moot. In a controlled burn where oxygen and fuel are regulated in an optimal mix jet fuel will reach a maximum temperature of 1800F which is still not anywhere near the temperature required to weaken the steel girders of a building to the point that the entire building would plummet to the ground. Yet molten steel was reported below the towers, suggesting that a very powerful fuel was used set to burn or explode BELOW the building not at its top. Thermite, an HTA (high-temperature accelerant)typically used in military operations would have been able to liquefy the steel. Thermite can reach a temperature of 4500F in 2 seconds and steel begins to melt at 2750F. [8]Professor Steven Jones a physicist at Brigham Young University came forward in Nov 2004 with a published paper on the possibility of thermite having been used at the WTC on 9/11. He has now found not only solidified drops of molten metal in dust samples from the WTC but evidence of sulfuric granulation(a "eutectic reaction")on the structural steel, which suggests that thermate an enhanced form of thermite, was involved in the destruction of the towers. Test it yourself: Get some kerosene (even though it burns slower than jet fuel) put it in a coffee can and throw it on a fire. Stand back though. Cause this is what happened when those planes hit. Then you may want to throw some unburned kerosene on a tree or some steel, try a coke can. And light it. It doesnt even melt the coke can it burns so quickly. Example: On February 13, 1975 the WTC North Tower was beset by a fire which "burned at temperatures in excess of 1300F for over three hours and spread over 65% of the 11th floor, including the core, caused no serious structural damage to the steel structure. In particular, no trusses needed to be replaced. "Source: New York Times, Saturday 15th February 1975 (2)and(3) The websites below show evidence of controlled explosion/demolition. http://firefightersfor911truth.org...http://firefightersfor911truth.org...(4)Unexploded Energetic Materials Found in WTC Dust in nov of 2007, Steven E. Jones, having earlier shown the presence of aluminothermic residues in WTC dust samples in the form of solidified iron rich droplets, announced his discovery of particles of unreacted thermitic materials, in the form of bi-layered chips with gray and red layers. See site below. . http://firefightersfor911truth.org...The Pentagon:(1)My opponent stated:"The planes were not shot down before they reached the Pentagon because no one saw this coming at all" Really? The Pentagon and White House are the best protected public buildings in the US. They are equipped with a battery of surface to air missiles and the airspace above it is the subject of a permanent overfly ban. Flight 77 made its way to Washington unchallenged for over half an hour the plane was picked up by Washington ATC for the first time at 9:33. By this time it was flying well in excess of 400 mph and on a trajectory that put it directly on course for the White House. Before getting there however the plane suddenly executed a left hand descending turn, turning almost a complete circle and dropping 7000 ft in two and a half minutes. This complex manoeuvre levelled out perfectly in line for a direct hit on the Pentagon and it flew the last few hundred yards just a few feet above the ground, clipping trees and lamp poles before ploughing into the Pentagon at an estimated speed of 480 mph. (2)My opponent stated: "The plane did not fly directly into the Pentagon. The plane hit the ground and then bounced into the side of the building. " If that were true why is there not a scratch on the Pentagon lawn after the crash of a large airliner came in on a flat trajectory? See images below:. http://911review.com...(3)My opponent stated:"The reason that there were so few fatalities was because The area was under construction. This is a well known fact now that can be found anywhere online. " Flight 77 struck the portion of the building that had already been renovated. The fact that they happened to hit an area that had been built so sturdily was a wonderful gift. The rest of the Pentagon would not have fared as well. Wow another coincidence. My opponent has not proven a single thing except for the fact that the official 911 explanations are false. That leads to the question why would our government not just show evidence to back its story? It is because they do not wish to incriminate themselves. 19 terrorist could not have pulled off this attack alone in no way shape or form. ***Side not to my opponent can you please source your information. .. .. [1] . http://911research.wtc7.net...[2] . http://www.washingtonpost.com...[3] . http://whatreallyhappened.com...[4] . http://911truth.tripod.com...[5] . http://911research.wtc7.net...[7] . http://www.guardian.co.uk...[8] . http://www.911weknow.com...