The Christian God exists (7)

Thanks for your arguments Jedi. I wouldn't be so certain about the win just yet though.I have two refutations to your philosophical proof.1. How do you make the assumption that if a property is consistent (has no logical contradictions) that it must be exemplified by something?2. The property of being god-like could be exemplified by a fictional character, such as the god of the Bible or Harry Potter. This is consistent with your entire proof and is an alternate explanation to your 4th theorem.So I agree that there is a fictional being who is god-like, but that's about it at this point.As for your DNA paragraph,DNA is not in any form of an alphabet and has nothing to do with language. When we sequence DNA in chains like GATCCTAGATCGCAGTAT, those are letters we're giving to four bases that make up the nucleotides of the DNA (adenine, guanine, cytosine, and thymine). Keep in mind that we humans have also named these chemicals this, and we're the ones who made up our alphabet. I'm not going to explain DNA sequencing to you, so you can read about what I've just said about DNA and much more here[1][2]. The long and short of this is that DNA contains no inherent language; we humans have just given them codes (such as the one I wrote earlier) to represent certain bases that we invented the names for. So by changing the name of any one of these bases, the code could easily become GFTCCTFGFTCGGFGTFT.Therefore, when a team of linguists come in and decide that this genetic code is identical to ancient Aramaic (keep in mind that the way we've interpreted this code only has four letters), which has a comprehensive alphabet and is a quite complex language[3], you can see why there'd be doubt about how they came to that conclusion.Thus you'd think to look at some sort of write-up or description of the processes the people at ENCODE went through to find this connection to Aramic. However, Pro's source does not have any sign of this, nor does a google of the study. So let's discard all of those fact's I've just brought up for a second and assume that human DNA actually has an inherent language (this is much the same as giving random letters to different height categories of grass blades and calling it a language), that this language happens to be ancient Aramic (derived from Hebrew, the language of the Bible. How convenient, among every other language[4]), and that there happens to be multiple Bible verses in this Aramic human genome (of which there is no evidence). Even if all these things were given to Pro (which I'm not doing), there would still be a perfectly reasonable explanation for this. The human genome is extremely vast and contains many nucleotides. This means that there is quite a bit of code involved in sequencing our entire genome. So just how many nucleotides are there? In fact, there are approximately 3 billion, 200 million nucleotides in the human genome[5]. If you counted one number every second (which is quite optimistic), it would take around 96 years to count this high[6]. This leaves enough room to show that these Bible passages most likely would occur in a random sequence of letters that long, not the other way around. One would also expect to find Satan's name several times in a sequence of such a magnitude; does this mean that Satan also had a hand in the creation of the human genome?I rest my case about the DNA and await my opponent's response.Sources:1. http://seqcore.brcf.med.umich.edu...2. http://en.wikipedia.org...3. http://en.wikipedia.org...4. http://www.loc.gov... 5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... 6. http://www.infoplease.com...