The United States does not need any more laws. We need to abolish laws that aren't necessary.

Because you cant seem to respond to more than one idea at a time I'll break up my response for you.There's a MASSIVE difference between being a soldier and being a lawyer, and that isn't any evidence to suggest that the government rarely creates comprehensive and simple ideas that work....Ok. I am in no way saying that being a soldier is similar to being a lawyer. I wouldn't dare disrespect my fellow service members like that. What I am suggesting is that I have first hand experience with how irrational and mindless some government mandated rules can be.We shouldn't dumb down the language in bills just so that every idiot from Florida to Alaska can have a clue in understanding what they mean. Laws are enacted to change society in a legal and organized matter, not so that people can have some good reading material. If an 18 year old is required to abide by every law and regulation, shouldn't he or she be able to understand every word of it? LAWS SHOULD NEVER CHANGE SOCIETY. Laws SHOULD be made to protect the current way of life of a society. Could YOU comprehend all 906 pages of the "Affordable Care Act"?There are idiotic bills introduced to Congress every week that never get the chance to be voted on. Bills calling for Obamas impeachment, withdrawing from the UN, withdrawing from NAFTA, declaring war on Saudi Arabia, etc that have all been introduced and killed quickly.... The people don't have to fight every bill where if we don't they get passed, Congress already eliminates a surprising number of stupid bills on its own where only a few of them slip through the cracks. Why should Obama NOT be impeached? Do you think that congress really has the best interest of the people in mind when they vote on bills? No, they don't (at least 90% of them) They go by what vote would look good on their record or what vote would get them votes from their party affiliation in the next election. How do you think those bills 'slip through the cracks'? They sure don't read them. They go with whatever their buddies are voting.There's a difference between not knowing about it and not caring about it.... And its usually the latter oneYou don't think the American public cares about due process? You think they don't care about the government detaining people that haven't been proved guilty?1) The claim that he signed it on New Years to avoid public uproar is pure speculation2) This if anything sounds like a damn good reason for the government to keep making laws, so that they can fix the screw-ups found in earlier laws! It wasn't a coincidence. Let me get this straight... You think that because this group of people make terrible, unconstitutional, unjust, and morally corrupt laws, they should make MORE to try to counteract those?Ok 1) Its called the Farmer Assurance Provision not the Monsanto Protection Act...2) All the bill does state that lower courts should not automatically prohibit the planting of biotech crop varieties, or the harvest and sale of biotech crops already planted, when their commercial approval is revoked for procedural reasons. Emphasis on should instead of cant and procedural instead of health Oh, my bad, I guess using truthful names for things should be made illegal. Section 735 effectively shields large 'biotech' companies, like Monsanto, from the federal courts in case something is found to be harmful in their genetically-modified seeds. Because of Section 735, federal courts would be powerless to stop Monsanto from selling their product. This is a DANGEROUS law. I would advise you to start growing your own food or to buy from a local farmer if you aren't already doing so. Me? Im still waiting for you to give a half-rational argument on why the US doesnt need any more laws.... So far the best evidence youve used is that 'theyre too hard to read' which is a really stupid a** reason to not have any more of them... Im also still waiting for you to respond to why we we shouldnt make new laws to sort out stuff like drones, marijuana, gay marriage, abortion, taxes, etc....I am not saying that the United States doesn't need more laws. I am saying that we need to get rid of the toxic laws that are in effect today. Abolishing the laws such as The Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 would solve problems instead of creating new ones. I think that there needs to be strict laws protecting the people from the government not themselves. Laws regarding who you marry, what you ingest, what you and your doctor do, or what you buy an sell need to be nullified.