Any topic!

Since no parameters were established for this debate, and the burden of proof is on me to prove God exists, I will use this round to present new arguments, and support previous ones. I do not have to rebuttal my opponent because I only need to prove of God's existence. My opponent cannot reject the validity of faith based occurrences as not proof, because it wasn't established that this type of argument wasn't valid. Also, God was not defined, nor the definition of existence so I will not have to restrict my arguments to any evidence that is based on reality (hence my argument for intelligent design) (but in good sport I will assume the "God exists" means the Christian Deity). God could be anybody. My opponent also knows that he can believe anything he wants to, I don't need to make my opponent believe only prove God exists. My opponent also seems to be "straw-manning" my arguments concerning the Bible. You misrepresented my argument. The Bible speaks of God and therefore relevant to my argument that it is to prove his existence. We are not debating the truthfulness of the Bible, but you can't dismiss it as invalid and untrue to my argument. The Bible speaks of God, and recounts several author's encounters with God, and speaks of real places in the world where these encounter's were held. My citation of course is the Bible (NIV). To further prove the existence of God, the very name implies it's existence because God is Omniscient, Omnipotent, Omnipresent. Everyday we see and hear of the miracles of God, several famous people in modern television and politics reference God as a source of inspiration. Can you possibly draw inspiration from nothing? God needs to exist because these people cannot be inspired if his existence wasn't prevalent in their lives. Several established buildings, and books, and scholars all teach that God exists and are influenced by his divine providence. Furthermore, existence of God cannot be disproved due to the very nature of God and the reference material for which our understanding of God comes from. This isn't an argument on validity of the sources, nor the existence of which God takes place. My simple imagination of him makes him exist. Whether or not you believe is irrelevant, and has no basis in this debate. For this reason, this topic can not be debated. any argument you make i can quickly counteract with some nonsense, though nobody will vote for me anyways because God's existence is ultimately decided on who you are asking. This is more opinion based, and because my opinions of God's existence are that he doesn't I do not feel I can adequately defend this position without better parameters. And any parameters that would make this a fair debate, the topic I most certainly don't agree with. I would like to challenge you in an honest debate, on a subject more suitable to something more engaging. If I were to engage in a topic religion based, i'd rather talk about the Theology of it, or the implications "Has religion helped or hindered humanity" that is a topic I would be more willing to engage in with a better set of parameters. I can't seriously conjure an adequate scientific, rational, logical argument to refute the fact that God doesn't exist because unlike theists; i base my views and understandings in reality for the most part. I get that in debating you have to take the opposition side to your personal beliefs from time to time, but the opposite side within these parameters will make me sound childish as they are the only arguments I can rely on. So, perhaps maybe a different debate and this time we can set parameters that will make more a more meaningful and enlightening debate over the uselessness of this one?