Racial/Religous Profliling

My opponent starts off his debate with a flawed resolution. He defines "racial/religious profiling" by stating that it is "profiling someone based on their religion or race." That is incorrect, and my opponent not providing a source for that definition is further evidence. Racial profiling "is the act of suspecting or targeting a person of a certain race based on a stereotype about their race." [1] Now that we got that out of the way, I'll start my rebuttal."the reason why African Americans have a higher chance of committing crime isn"t because of there skin colour, but because of the fact that African Americans are on disproportionately poorer than other races due to general racial discrimination"The reason why black people commit more crimes because of their economic state is false. Poor persons living in urban areas (43.9 per 1,000) had violent victimization rates similar to poor persons living in rural areas (38.8 per 1,000). Poor urban blacks (51.3 per 1,000) had rates of violence similar to poor urban whites (56.4 per 1,000). [2]My opponent just stacks logical fallacy on top of logical fallacy. My opponent uses the fact the black people are more likely to be poor, poor people are more likely to be criminals, so black people have the right to use being poor as something of an excuse against profiling or committing crimes for that matter. This is illogical (and false, as I proved above). Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks commit around half of the homicides in the United States. [3] From 2011 to 2013, 38.5 percent of people arrested for murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault were black. [4] This figure is three times higher than the 13% black population figure. Black males aged 15-34, who account for around 3% of the population, are responsible for the vast majority of these crimes despite being outnumbered by whites five to one, blacks commit eight times more crimes against whites than vice-versa. A black male is 40 times as likely to assault a white person as a white person assaulting a black person. [5] The fact that black people are more likely to be poor is irrelevant and a lacking (and false) excuse, it would be logical and completely rational to investigate a group of people that disproportionality commits violent crimes than any other. "Muslims don"t disproportionately commit terrorists acts because of their religion, nor do they commit terrorists acts because of where they come from, but they do so because of a complex socio-political situation that the Muslims find themselves in with regards to their identity and their origin""The better young people are integrated, the greater the chance is that they radicalize. This hypothesis is supported by a lot of evidence." — From a report by researchers at Erasmus University in Rotterdam. [6] "The proportions of [Islamic State] administrators but also of suicide fighters increase with education," according to a World Bank report. [7] "Moreover, those offering to become suicide bombers ranked on average in the more educated group." Britain's MI5 revealed that "two-thirds of the British suspects have a middle-class profile and those who want to become suicide bombers are often the most educated." [8] Researchers have discovered that "the richer the countries are the more likely will provide foreign recruits to the terrorist group [ISIS]." [9] So, quite the opposite, and I'll take you not providing a source for that unsubstantiated claim as further evidence of it being false. Conclusion I won't be responding to any other of my opponents claims that weren't backed by sources. For example: "it has been shown numerous times that increasing the number of police patrolling a certain community only leads to an increase of the number of arrests due to the fact that there is more police there" and "many scholars agree on and that is that the religion of Islam isn"t inherently more violent than let"s say Christianity."Both of which are inherently false based on the evidence at hand, and my opponent not providing any sources just further proves that. But I need not disprove anything that wasn't "proved" in the first place. The only arguments relevant to the issue at hand and provided with sources are about the black community being "disproportionately poorer than other races" and "crime [being] more correlated to one"s economic situation than to one"s race." Both of which I have disproven.1.) https://en.wikipedia.org...;2.) https://www.bjs.gov...;3.) https://www.bjs.gov... 4.) https://ucr.fbi.gov...;5.) https://www.yahoo.com...;6.) http://www.standaard.be...;7.) http://documents.worldbank.org...;8. ) http://www.dailymail.co.uk...;9.) http://www.standaard.be...;