god has no moral compass

"I assume you're going to take my words out of context" Oh you mean the way you completely take YOUR bible out of context? And just because you cannot communicate properly, that"s not my problem, that"s entirely yours. "Michael, I am impressed. You responded with material." ARE YOU SERIOUS? Now I am REALLY p**sed. The entire RD1 WAS material in which you completely and totally ignored. RD2 presented why text would NEVER be used by YOUR god. Not for any reason. And it should have hit your brain, that since this is true you have absolutely no sources whatsoever for your god and is automatically fraudulent, thus completely immoral. Nah. That"s too much to ask for someone who SHOULD be educated and intelligent. So why shouldn"t I completely ignore you? Sheesh! And you wonder why I berate you. That"s within my rights when you DO NOT know your product and yet you pretend that you do and you thus invent excuses for it. If you do that to any teacher = instant F. If you do that to your friends and loved ones = no friends and loved ones. Try it! Oh but wait, you already have which is why you have no genuine friends and loved ones. (But wait! That one of your christ's sneeze rag stipulations is that you have no family and FOLLOW HIM!) So why should I deal with it here? This ---is--- taught in college. "I have given you respect and I have given you patience," Oh no you haven"t by your lack of intelligence and education. Its insulting. "Also, you claim I have no knowledge to which I speak. You haven't countered or re-countered my claims," There"s nothing you can counter with!!! Especially when dealing with complete immorality. "This part of the debate could be so simple if I follow YOUR method by claiming that you have no evidence for God not existing"" No that"s not what I said, even though there isn"t because you would even have to dig yourself a bigger tar pit with that statement because then it becomes "which god"? What I said was you cannot even prove that your god even exists. That"s a stark black and white difference. Because you can"t. There is no claim that you have. "Now, let's address your concerns dealing with the moral test. Again, you have failed to establish that a deity is subject to human moral relativism" WRONG. But let"s see what YOU said. And that"s why I am an atheist and you are a so-called christian and you do not know the difference between what morality and immorality is. "But, let's assume a human can place moral restrictions on a creator deity," Ab-so-lu-tely 100% we can. Why shouldn"t we be able to especially when you cannot---even---prove---that---this---deity---exists? AND even worse for you is that this supposed deity is supposed to be kind, caring, loving, harmonious, peaceful etc etc etc. and something you as a supposed christian (in which there is no such a thing that"s another debate entirely as to the why, but simply put christ is a false messiah in which is so ridiculously easy to prove) "whom we assume exists because of, once again, your initial premise claims He does." Oh for f--ks sake. NO. What is wrong with you? Until this supreme deity is proven, it---does---not---exist. There---is---only---a---belief. "I first need to know whose morality do we use to judge all people?" I didn"t ask "all people" you fricken a$$. I asked YOU. Naturally YOU avoided in answering the questions because YOU know that the questions are ALWAYS the answer of "No" but YOU can NEVER admit it, because they are completely immoral made by a completely immoral god OF YOURS only in which YOU cannot even produce as existing. So one question in which nearly 100% of all so-called christians cannot answer - why believe? "So let's answer your questions"" Let"s not. Let"s end this. I cannot deal and or debate with those who are completely immoral and thus invent excuses. - Why Does Every Intelligent christian disobey jesus? And you most certainly do.