BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Gun control laws

Hello. In our society, many people wish to implement stricter gun control laws in our society. I am against the proposals, and am taking the con side of this argument.The link we will be using is here.http://www.feinstein.senate.gov...This is a very confusing legal document, so we will be quoting from here. http://www.feinstein.senate.gov...Yes, I know that there are quite a few gun control debates, but I think that this is a topic worthy of its controversy.First round is for acceptance, second round is for stating your initial arguments, then we can post our rebuttals. Thank you for the debate, and make sure it's serious. I do not want 50 word posts stating one argument. Good luck!
Polite Rap Battle

Whoa this gentleman's slick!Those be some suitable glasses,And that smart look ain't no trick,He takes the AP classes,This dude's got a mind so quick,Y'all lookin' slow as molasses,Don't you call him sidekick,Or he might kick some asses,But I'll kick myself out, cause my rhymes just stunk,He's just got funkYou just a punkNow just go home, you're drunk.Cause it's always happy hour when Dan's around,He possesses superpowers makes you dance around,Female sexes all just cower at his trancing sound,Just one look, *snap* Her pants are down,But let's head back to Earth, he's a really nice guy,I mean for what it's worth he's got more style than PSY,Since the day of his own birth, he's been rocking the tie,Even Double O'Seven ain't a classier spy, So say Adios to Sauron cause they call him Goldeneye, (Nothing rhymes with Sauron) MaqicDan is superfly, Ain't no party like a Maqic party, wanna know why?Two Words:Pinkie Pie.So pony up when you debate him, yeah you better not drag,No phony ultimatum if your pants gotta sag, This homie killed a hater with a pink canvas bag,He's got-Do I gotta say it? Do I gotta say it? Do I gotta say it? Do I gotta say it? Yeah,SWAG At this final rebuttal, I don't mean to burst my bubble,But there surely will be rubble,Oh my Lord I am in trouble.Deuces.
Polite Rap Battle

Oh damn listen to that This guy just busted some rap I feel fat Bloated with this knowlege dude wheres your college?Where to even startThis ginger gets all the chicks He knows all the kicksbest pick up lines youve heard And this kid can lastlike "hey babe my watch says your naked"but its five minutes fastsmooththis guys got the grovelike some sort of brickyou better move Or youll be sucking his stickwoah bro no homothis guy is troublejust beat up this guy ronthen did the dudes mom!theres no hope brutalityfatalityhe should be the new popeKing Author reencarnatedMegan Fox hes probably dateddangI'm not even started but I'm getting lazySo in conclusion: Hes crazy!
Polite Rap Battle

Aw, snap, it's MaqicDan,He the man,Got a plan, Step aside if you can,This dude's got more moves than Jackie Chan,And have you seen this brother do debate?Oh my damn,Step out of the coliseum, This bro does policy um,and he,Tops my fallacy um,And I ,do Interp.Ever seen me write an argument?Ha.Derp.He chugs my case like a Pepsi,Slurp.But this brother don't do Coke,He's, The profile you can't poke,Please,All my cases are a joke,I talk about ponies? He goes for broke,But he's got cash money,Wins all the honeys,Makes your day all sunny,Like Winnie the Pooh,This Tigger's number one cause I smell like number two,But there's no,Sequel for me, I mean Dan, look at you!I'm a ginga,You're a ninja,What could I really do?Somebody messed with Maqic? I pity the foo,If Mister T. couldn't see this legend then who?So,Before you make your case and become a star,Take this moment just to realize how great you are.PEACE
abortion

Yes I agree, but I mean to be honest, the offspring wasn't there in the first place. Like you said, people have sex for pleasure and they should be able to face the consequences they created, but I mean. Teenagers like us don't know how to raise a child and abortion is one of the only ways to get out of the way. I mean yes every one deserves to live but not everyone wants to go through that labor and then not be able to keep the child. Like come on, we go through all that pain just to give the child away? I say no. Its better to not have it than to regret it. Many of us have reputations to handle and manage, like for instance, human race and religion gets into all of this too. Some religions can bring down shame towards the person whereas others bring more power. People say that the world is becoming a worse place every day and honestly its because of us. Teens have sex on a regular basis and if they all keep the child then the human race will not be able to sustain its population and everything. I completely agree with you that abortion shouldn't be mistreated but lets face the fact. You wouldn't want your daughter when she's 16 to be pregnant. I mean what kind of life is that? You haven't even lived yours correctly and now you want to take care of another? no so I guess abortion is strongly opposed into many perspectives. Lets take prostitution for example. So many of the girls use the money that comes from prostitution as a living and use it to buy shelter and ration. Like what if the condom breaks while having sex then what? If abortion is banned then life would be hell. I'm not saying that kids are bad but I'm not saying that they are good either. Sometimes we get swayed away with little ideas and its just doesn't work. And plus on top of that, its the mothers choice whether she wants to destroy something that she created or not. Just like the way you delete your text messages so your parents wouldn't see what you are up to. And I completely respect your opinion. You are right in your shoes and I'm right in mine, its just a matter of perspective.
abortion

I just wanna start off saying that I'm not trying be mean or anything. This is just my opinion. And I respect your opinion. Yeah, I do admit that I wouldn't want to keep a child if I ever got raped. But, if you had sex for pleasure without using the proper supplies then you should have to pay the consequence. Think if that child that was killed. it never had a chance to live. Everybody is put on this Earth to bring good, how will that happen if someone is killed before it's even born. Why would you wanna kill a baby when there are spouses who are unable to have kids and want to adopt? The child could bring much joy into a persons life. Everybody born or unborn DESERVES a chance to live .
abortion

I personally don't mind abortion but because its a choice. I think that every women should have their own right to decide whether they want to keep the offspring or not. I mean I know that abortion is not a good thing but think about it. Relationships nowadays are not like the olden days where they would just hug and kiss on special occasions. Now because of our generation so many of us have gone beyond that point. The teenagers that are in relationships often have sex. The thing is that, maybe they just wanted to have sex, no harsh feelings and then the condom broke. I mean, put yourself in that situation. What would you do? I mean it was unintentional and it just happened but you aren't ready for a baby and neither is your partner. Then what? I mean yes abortion shouldn't be used that often but I mean its needed at situations. Like what if you got raped?.. And now your pregnant. Would you want to keep a rapists bloody child? No. Yes I completely agree that its a gods creation and that god wouldn't want you to destroy a beautiful creation but I mean really, if abortion should be banned then all the girls who get raped would have to keep the baby whether they want to or not.
Gay Marriage Should Be Legal in the United States

Responses: >> "The bible might not be admissible as a source of law in the U.S. But the bible does define what a marriage is. " Whoop-de-do. So does the Quran, but we don't look there, do we? The Bible is completely irrelevant. >> "You say the right for states to decide issues among the state itself is unconstitutional, yet that's what the founding fathers wanted." For an issue that's enumerated in the constitution, (like equal protection) or outlined by federal law (like fundamental rights or suspect classification) the states do not trump the federal government. The founding fathers wanted a small federal government, sure, but on FEDERAL ISSUES, the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT is supreme. >> "If you want a gay marriage then go to a state that allows it. If you want it in your state write your governor to have a vote for it." If you want freedom of speech, then go to a state that allows it. If you want freedom of your speech, write your governor and have a vote... See the problem with placing these sorts of restrictions on rights? >> "But without the law in mind. I am just speaking of the Bible" For the last time, YOU MUST OFFER A LEGAL ARGUMENT. >> "the Bible describes a marriage between a man and a woman. Now lets the bring the law into play" Oh. My. God. How many times do I need to tell you that the Bible is unrelated to the law?!!??! >> "The law would have never put marriage in writing if the bible didn't create a marriage." Faulty reasoning. The Bible outlines a process for killing homosexuals and harlots, but you don't see those in laws do you? The Bible forbids eating shrimp and rabbit, but you don't see laws against that, do you? The Bible forbids having sex while a woman is on her period. Is there a law against that? I didn't think so... ****************************************************************************** My opponent has still offered no argument other than "I disagree" and "because the Bible says so." Obviously, in the spirit of fair debating, he cannot even make a rebuttal against my opening argument because I would have no chance to respond to it. This debate has been woefully lacking on the part of my opponent. The decision is clear - vote PRO. AFFIRMED.
Gay Marriage Should Be Legal in the United States

The bible might not be admissible as a source of law in the U.S. But the bible does define what a marriage is. You say the right for states to decide issues among the state itself is unconstitutional, yet that's what the founding fathers wanted. They wanted a small government. We all know the constitution is interpreted a different way by the next one to read it, but here is my interpretation. If you want a gay marriage then go to a state that allows it. If you want it in your state write your governor to have a vote for it. If you want to call my argument disappointing that is fine. But without the law in mind. I am just speaking of the Bible, the Bible describes a marriage between a man and a woman. Now lets the bring the law into play. The law would have never put marriage in writing if the bible didn't create a marriage.
Gay Marriage Should Be Legal in the United States

Responses: >> "I was agreeing with the law when I stated "should" referring to marriage should be between a man and a woman." And I'm saying that law is unconstitutional. Defend your position. >> "I also gave references stating that in the bible homosexuality isn't even accepted." Oops - sorry - the Bible isn't admissible as a source of law in the US. Next? >> "Therefore making an actual marriage not acceptable because a marriage is religious." Again - I JUST gave you the legal definitions of marriage TWICE. >> "I also agree with the current law of allowing individual states to vote for allowing gay marriage." That law is ALSO unconstitutional. Defend your position. >> "If you believe in gay marriage please prove to me where marriage is not a religious ceremony and does not contradict the bible." Marriage is a religious ceremony AND a legal institution. And, once again, the Bible is not a source of law in the United States. ********************************************************************** This is very disappointing. My opponent has offered no argument other than "I disagree" and "because the Bible says so." AFFIRMED.
Gay Marriage Should Be Legal in the United States

I was agreeing with the law when I stated "should" referring to marriage should be between a man and a woman. I also gave references stating that in the bible homosexuality isn't even accepted. Therefore making an actual marriage not acceptable because a marriage is religious. I also agree with the current law of allowing individual states to vote for allowing gay marriage. I obviously have my stand but it would be very interesting to see where each state would stand on the issue. If you believe in gay marriage please prove to me where marriage is not a religious ceremony and does not contradict the bible.
Gay Marriage Should Be Legal in the United States

From my opening argument: 750 ILCS 5/201: Formalities. A marriage between a man and a woman licensed, solemnized and registered as provided in this Act is valid in this State. 750 ILCS 5/211(a)(5) a marriage between 2 individuals of the same sex. Section 5/211(a) details prohibited classes of marriage. These laws are found at least in general form in many states. Marriage shall be held to be in relevant part: (1) The social institution under which a man and woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife by legal commitments, religious ceremonies, etc. (2) The state of being a married couple voluntarily joined for life (or until divorce) (3) The ceremony containing certain legal formalities by which a marriage relationship is created. ****************************************************************** My opponent ignored my definition and legal representation of what the legal institution "marriage" actually is. His entire argument about how marriage *should* be a religious institution is moot - we're talking about what marriage LEGALLY IS, not what it RELIGIOUSLY SHOULD BE. Extend my arguments. AFFIRMED.
Gay Marriage Should Be Legal in the United States

You have some really good facts to back your argument. The biggest issue with gay marriage is that marriage is a religious ceremony. 1 Corinthians 6:9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. If God opposes it, then it wouldn't be very religious now would it. Genesis 13:13 Now the men of Sodom were wicked and were SINNING GREATLY against the Lord. I will spare the bible quotes for a while. The point is marriage is not a marriage unless it is religious. If you want to get a civil union or partnership for tax, and any other reasons, that's fine. I truly believe homosexuality is a genetic disorder, and anybody living with this disorder can still have a partnership with someone but not MARRIAGE. A marriage should be between a man and a woman.
Conceal carry laws decrease violent crime

Rebuttals: “My opponent’s first argument is one source how is it credible. ” Now, I assume that Pro means to say that Lott is credible. Problem? Pro has no supporting evidence! His entire argument revolves around this point, and when we look back over his fourth round statement we see no justification for this statement. I see this as proof enough that Pro’sdata cannot be credible. “If my opponent really wants 16 studies, he can have them” I Do. How convenient (for Pro) that the debate is over and I cannot have 16 studies. I also question whether or not Pro understands these studies. I am forced to assume that, because he has failed to justify their credibility, Pro has no understanding of the numbers. Essentially, he has spewed “facts” with no logical explanation behind them. "My opponent then insults Lott"And again, a blanket statement with no support. I meant no disrespect. I believe that Lott is a professional, but professionals make mistakes. Professionals who have political interests make even larger mistakes. To adress the point that Lott was originally Anti Gun, I commend him for being oppen minded, but this is hardly a factor. Who knows what caused his change of heart? It can't be traced and could easily be false. “First, he claims he left out black women” And Pro accuses me of utilizing red herrings? How could he have possibly come to that deduction? I stated that removing black women from the equation had a greater effect on violent crime than this handgun law apparently did. This is only to show that “dummy”or not, hundreds of variables can easily affect his “facts. ” Say Lott conductedhis study during a cold spell or suchlike. Any variable could play a larger role than CCW. Ignored Points:"The central problem is that crime moves in waves, yet Lott's analysis does not include variables that can explain these cycles. " "all the other graphs. .. follow no such pattern. " "Correlation= CausationUnfortunately, My opponent does nothing but make a statement with elaboration but no justification"(Still no logic here)"Lott credibility was brought into question after the 98% polling investigation"(Once again, Pro diverts attention without adresing the issue. ) racial tensions. 65 murders each day in hot blood (once again, nothing but empty blanket statements here)---- Pro has nothing statistics to counter examples. In response to his accusation that none of my examples are grounded in reality, I counter with the Treyvon Martin case. I'm sure everyone remembers this. The list goes on, but these cover the major areas without being overly overwhelming. Voters, I see a simple choice here. Logic vs Unreliable statistics. Go ahead and read over the debate again, if you wish. Again and again, you will see that logic and applicable reference are ignored or masked by Pro's wave of statistics from a disreputable study that he has failed to support. Go and look at crime patterns, watch the news, or just go for a stroll through a shady neighborhood. It's clear that CCW is a damaging, illogical law that does much more harm than good.
Conceal carry laws decrease violent crime

Lets see if I can get a good debate on this. .. . I do not argue the law itself has an effect, the piece of paper will not do anything, but the effects of the law do. The meaning is simple. So, I as pro think these laws are generally accompanied by decreases in crime. .. Please no semantics. =Definitions=Conceal carry or CCW is a law passed that allows citizens to carry handguns concealed, after they turn 21. =Rules=No semantics No trollingYou argue CCW laws have NO effect or a BAD effect on crime. .. I argue CCW laws generally lower crime.
Gay Marriage should be legalized

My point in talking about the 14th amendment and talking about someone's rights being infringed on if a law supporting gay marriage were to be set in place, under the current administration, there would most likely be an addendum allowing the gay couple to sue if they were turned down for a marriage ceremony. My opp IS right that anyone can sue for anything at any time, HOWEVER you just do not hear about a gay couple suing a church, synagouge, or mosque for turning them away due to that place's religious beliefs. That in itself would be discrimination for a religious belief would it not? Currently there is no law banning gay marriage. Prop 8, you say? let's look at some facts about Prop 8, shall we? Prop 8 was never actually a law but rather a propsition for a law. Prop 8 was only in California Therefore Prop 8 was not Federal. I also believe Prop 8 was overturned and never got the chance to become an actual law So it is now up to my opp to explain how a gay couple cannot legally get married The reason I believe gays want marriage for financial benefits that come with marriage, is because if they loved one another why would a document matter? Do they really need a document stating they love eachother? A document is not, I repeat, NOT love. Love is about a connection, Love is about taking care of one another. Love is about looking passed eachother's imperfections. How can a document prove love? I understand this is closing argument time, but I would implore my Opp to answer each question. And if he wants to go the route about the marriage document would enable a gay person to visit their spouse in the hostpital consider this: A straight couple is not yet married. Let's say they are engaged. one gets sick and is hospitalized. According to the gay rights proponents, you cannot visit a boyfriend or girlfriend because they are not legally family. The sick partner then dies. There is no will so the living partner is entitled to nothing. The dead partner's family hates the living partner so they do not allow them to attend the funeral because they are not family. Where's the outrage now? As stated before I believe there are ways that gays are injustly discriminated against, such as the workplace. But I have a disability and am discriminated against when trying to find a job as well. The good thing is there are laws against discrimination. I just do not think marriage is something you can discriminate against. Thank you
Gay Marriage should be legalized

I will be taking Pro in this debate as I believe that whether you are gay or straight, marriage is way to show your love for each other. I believe it is discriminative of the church and of the state to decide that gay people are not allowed to express their love in this way. I see that Con is basing his case on rights, but rather strangely denies marriage is a right at all... Currently, the right to marriage (Article 16) is quite clearly stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I will be interested to hear Con's argument on that... Please proceed with your opening arguments...
hitting your children should be considered a crime

The reason Louis Braille invented Braille was because he was blind, And he was intelligent. Although we should kill most kids, Those with an in over 140 should just be severely disabilitated so they can better contribute to scociety. This ensures that the children who are good for the world will help us at maximum efficiency, Being disabled, And the ones who are bad for the world by wasting resources will be beat to death. By doing this, We will be making the world a better place and we will all ascend to heaven.
hitting your children should be considered a crime

The only place you will be let in is hell. Children do not harm the environment and use up resources. Louis Braille was injured at the age of 3. The accident caused him to be blind, By the age of 12 he invented Braille, A language that many people use all over the world. Chester Greenwood who invented earmuffs in 1873 which are also used all around the world. So many more examples can be set. Don't forget you were once a child. Some children actually provide more than they consume. Children don't only provide but they also bring happiness to our lives. By the way you used the exact same reason for every argument you stated. Try changing next time. . . . . .
hitting your children should be considered a crime

Children do nothing but waste resources and harm the environment. Children are not born pure, They are spawn of the devil and we must do something about them. By allowing these demons to have free rein in our world, We are allowing the devil to constantly watch and influence our world. I will not drink bleach until I have contributed to the bettering of our world by killing every single one of them- because at that point I know I will be let into heaven,
hitting your children should be considered a crime

what do you mean you have been doing a god job with beating children up? How will you have a future with no children? It is useless debating with you! No one should be hit. No one should be beaten up, Especially children. Children are born so pure, But people like you turn their worlds Black. If you think that people should not be able to have children, You would not be here. How can you do that to a dog or a cat? DRINK BLEACH. What kind of person thinks like that? How did your parents allow you to do that. That is inhumane and cruel. Please Explain how that awful mind of yours works