We should let Africans eat Fat People

"1. Appeal to popularity. " The argument I tried to make is that people think Cannabilism is unnatrual. Cannabilism is perfectly natural and that was the argument I tried to frame. "2. There are nutrients in food that goes to waste that can be used. " Could you provide examples? You still haven't touched about their malnutrition, and how they can gain weight with protein and fat. I ask Con if he against this, does this mean he is against them gaining weight to be at a good weight? "3.3. I highly doubt that one obese human can feed a whole village, much less sufficiently. "Thats why I suggest the really fat ones, the ones you see in 600 pound life shows. Those humans do exist, and we can use them to feed them. It also depends on the size of the villages, if needed we will have to send multiple fatties into the villages for food, so it really isn't much. "4. Why don't we just kill off China? That would also help fight climate change. " Yes that is true, but that would cost more lives. I ask Con how would he accomplish a task? Nuclear missles? War? Killing off China would mean war. Con still hasn't touched my points on using the fatties for food we can help the enviroment. He also use the comment "That would also help fight climate change. " He essentially conceded to my enviromental argument, by saying that would also help. 5. "There are better ways to get them to lose weight. "Could Con give examples? With my way they get an incentive to lose weight. This is a good quick efficent way to get them to lose weight or they will be shipped to Africa. He also acknowledges the ways and doesn't even attempt to refute them. 6. "Giving them a prize for forcing them death isn't making it a good thing. "Con is misinterprating what I said. I said that they were going to get a last meal, and they will be given a day to make their dues, and do what they want. It's a not a prize, it's mercy, and ethical to give them one final day. I personally think it is very ethical and correct.7. "Again, we can change humanity through alternative means. "Like what? Con has made statements with no arguments or examples to make. I also ask Con, is he going to attempt to refute my claims that this can change humanity by telling them to be less selfish, or something? With my way we get straight to the point, and we stay confident with our beleifs. In conclusion:Con hasn't given any solutions that can fix the problems that my soluation attemptsGiven statements without presenting examples that could refute my soluationHas never or barley touched any of my points that my arguments gainOffers no real solution to counter mineConceded to my enviromental argumentI ask the readers with my way we can have better humans, we can help the food crisis, we can stop animals getting needlessly slaughter, we can reduce our enviromental problems, we can have a more fit nation. Or we can listein to Cons solutions, which is nothing in he presented. Do you want to follow Cons idea? Because right now we are following Cons idea, and look what is happening. Food crisis that keeps on getting increased by a increasing fat nation. No real incentive to exercise. We tell them to be body positive, and accept they are fat. These fatties have no reason to exercise. We offer them countless reasons such as heart problems, digestive problems for years, and years. AND YET WE ARE A INCREASING FAT NATION. My idea is bold, my idea is controversial, but it offers a soluation, a solution that gets results, unlike Cons way of thinking.