Religion, Opponent chooses topic and states their side. Atheists or Christians welcome.

“Morality is not a “religion", it is simply a binary state of positive-feedback” I agree and was with you up to the god part. (Yes you do need to prove that he “started this system”.) You say “gods handwriting” consists of the laws of nature. Why? Because you think so? Isnt it possible that this system started with something else other then god. Either a push we haven’t thought of or something science simply hasn’t found out yet. Why is this proof of god? Just because things are connected does not prove god's (or his handwriting's) existence. using the logic of: "just because things have connections makes them come from some divine source" is absurd. For example: I am an animal. My dog is an animal. Animals are hard to make. They must come from the same factory. That sounds silly. Just because something is complex or difficult does not mean it is form a divine source. It just makes it cool. The Invisible hand. (video source) I enjoyed your video, but not for this debate. The Invisible hand metaphor is used in business and economics not religion. It is a simple business model of trading goods and services for other goods and services. Creating a pencil is not and end result, it is a middle. Every product, and person has a life cycle, things decay and are used up again this is not proof of god or his handwriting. It is proof of the nitrogen cycle and the intelligence of people. Passing a huge, impressive cycle like this off as the work of god is belittling the work of humans. This model is not showing humans mortality, nor is it the road to utopia as you suggested. No one works or preforms these tasks because they should (or because of god), it has nothing to do with your morality argument. People work to survive. It is simple. Further into your statement you say:“ From that video, there are no human “masterminds,” just the “invisible hand” of God's handwriting via the moral spontaneous efforts of individuals, naturally organize into a complex order of economic activities. These activities, improve the standard of living, guided by morality, on the road to utopia.” The video does state there are no masterminds. The thing is they are referring back to Adams economic philosophy and are clearly meaning “it is not government controlled” or it is not “monopolized” because it takes too much sources, from around the planet, to be fully monopolized. It is possible to monopolize these sources if someone where to rule the world, but they don’t, so they cant. Adam Smith, creator of the invisible hand philosophy, an economics man. Religion insparation was never known, http://www.liberalhistory.org.uk...Morality is science and students would benefit from it.Psychology is considered a science and morality is a subject of psychology. Schools tend to teach it as a separate subject because it is a huge subject to learn and many people who are interested in physics are not particularly interested in people. Within the school system there is a variety of social sciences that are available to study. This adds nothing to the topic of religion. In conclusionIn essence, for your argument to continue you must prove to me that gods handwriting (and therefore god) exists without restating that there are laws the universe follows. These laws are not proof of god and simply because you get the feeling he exists does not mean I do.