It is more likely that we live in a simulated reality than a real reality

Con demands justification, yet ironically they have some things to justify them selves. Lets go over my argument shall we. 1) It is possible to create a simulated reality Anything that is not proven to be logically impossible IS possible. As wikipedia says "A logically possible proposition is one that can be asserted without implying a logical contradiction. " [1] Now if Con rejects the "possibility" that is too say Con wants to argue that premise 1 is IMPOSSIBLE, then Con would have to prove that impossibility. With the possibility of premise 1 unchallenged lets move to premise 2. .. .. .. 2) If something/s can create a simulated reality then it probably will Here are some possible reasons that something/s would choose to create a simulated reality. .. .. . 1) Scientific/knowledge purposes - Running experiments in a real world is a pain, as you are confined to the natural laws in that real world. Running experiments in a virtual world is alot quicker, as you can by pass the natural world limitations and even set up scenarios which are difficult or impossible in the real world. 2) Entertainment - Think of the Sims or Virtual pets. .. .. .. .. but in this case the Sims and Virtual pets are alot more advanced than what we are used too. 3) Curiously - Ever wondered what would happen in a simulated reality if we do xyz ? Well only one way to find out, and that's to create that simulated reality and do xyz. 4) Boredom - Somethings like humans might watch football, some other things might create simulated realities, to each their own. 5) Because we can - We can do it, there is nothing stopping us. .. .. . With the possibility of a simulated reality existing, and possible reasons given why something/s would create a simulated reality and no reason given why they would not create a simulated reality we can move onto the next premise. .. .. . 3) If something/s does create a simulated reality it will probably create more than one With one simulated reality created, there are two possible outcomes in relation to how many simulated realities will be created either. .. .. .. .. Possible Situation A) 1 created simulated reality (no more created after the first one) Possible Situation B) More than 1 simulated reality (anywhere between 1 and infinity) These 2 sets which have between them all possible options, if not A then B, if not B then A. Its one or the other. I am no maths person, but situation B holds alot more possible outcomes than situation A, like 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% more than Situation A. With the possibility of a simulated reality existing, and possible reasons given why something/s would create a simulated reality and no reason given why they would not create a simulated reality and it being vastly more probable that their would be more than one simulated reality created the following premises follow through. .. .. .. . 4) Therefore its probable that simulated realities outnumber actual realities 5) Therefore its more likely that something exists in a simulated reality than actual reality 6) Therefore we are more likely to exist in a simulated reality than an actual reality The argument as stated is. .. .. .. .. 1) It is possible to create a simulated reality 2) If something/s can create a simulated reality then it probably will 3) If something/s does create a simulated reality it will probably create more than one 4) Therefore its probable that simulated realities outnumber actual realities 5) Therefore its more likely that something exists in a simulated reality than actual reality 6) Therefore we are more likely to exist in a simulated reality than an actual reality I look forward to Cons response. Sources 1) . http://en.wikipedia.org...