BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Connect Four

Good luck to whomever takes this debate. Official Resolution: I will win a majority of the games of Connect Four that I play against my opponent. ========= Debate Rules ========= 1. Five games of Connect Four are to be played in the comments section of this debate in the manner described below. 2. The winner of this debate is the person who wins 3 or more of the Connect Four rounds. All 7 points go to the person who won the majority of rounds, regardless of spelling/conduct/sources/argumentation. 3. No penalty is to be incurred for 'forfeiting' a debate round. 4. The result of each game of Connect Four will be posted in one of the rounds by each debater. 5. If the purpose of the debate is not clear, ask in comments. Do not abuse semantics, poorly worded rules, or anything else that would detract from the purpose of this debate. ================= Connect Four Instructions ================= 1. The board is 7x6. Placing a piece anywhere else besides in the game board is not allowed. 2. Traditional rules of Connect Four are to be followed. 3. I will go first in rounds 1 & 3. CON will go first in rounds 2 & 4. Should we reach a round 5, CON may decide who goes first. A template will be posted as below: Template Connect Four Debate Round 1 |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|_x_|___|___|___| To make a move, copy the template and paste it in a new comment, adding your piece: Template Connect Four Debate Round 1 |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|_o_|___|___|___| |___|___|___|_x_|___|___|___| When a game has been completed, the final board will be posted (with the 4-in-a-row capitalized) and a new game started. Example: Result Connect Four Debate Round 1 |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |___|___|___|_o_|_X_|___|___| |___|___|_o_|_X_|_o_|___|___| |___|_x_|_X_|_o_|_o_|___|___| |___|_X_|_o_|_x_|_x_|___|___| Again, good luck to CON! I look forward to this debate.
Music Battle

Heh, I decided to save some of the best for last -- I'm going to use two of the three best live performances I've watched. I'd like to start off with a little more Zeppelin -- a live version of the song Dazed and Confused. http://www.youtube.com... I always enjoyed the recorded version -- but this live version is just amazing; it epitomizes the greatness that is Led Zeppelin. ...also, watching this after smoking is intense. The parts where they show the close-up of Page's bow and when Bonham goes nuts on the drums were crazy to watch. My second song/video is Oh! Sweet Nuthin' by the Velvet Underground. http://www.youtube.com... I'm a big fan of the guitar work in this song; it's probably my favorite song to play. Next we have the song Holiday in Cambodia by the Dead Kennedys. http://www.youtube.com... This song has a lot of "kick" in it, just as much of the Dead Kennedys' music does. Fourth is one of my favorite songs off one of my favorite albums: Avenues and Alleyways by Rancid. http://www.youtube.com... My last song is the ultimate closing song -- Won't Get Fooled Again by the Who. http://www.youtube.com... It's a live version from the film the Kids Are Alright. It's my second favorite live performance -- but it's an awesome show-stopper.
Music Battle

http://www.youtube.com... "The Joker" - Steve Miller Band http://www.youtube.com... "Like A Rolling Stone" - Jimi Hendrix version http://www.youtube.com... "Crimson and Clover" - Prince version http://www.youtube.com... "Deacon Blues" - Steely Dan http://www.youtube.com... "Hey Jude" - The Beatles Thanks to patsox, as usual. :)
Music Battle

To start, I'm going to go with a little Free Bird by Lynyrd Skynyrd. http://www.youtube.com... The guitar work in this song is easily some of the best I've ever heard. Epic from start to finish. For my second video, I'm using Riot, Riot Upstart by Agnostic Front. http://www.youtube.com... Third, I'm going with All Along the Watchtower by Jimi Hendrix. http://www.youtube.com... Not only does it feature one of the most recognizable guitar solos in the history of rock music -- but this song is actually a cover of a Bob Dylan song. Dylan later admitted that Hendrix made it his own song -- he even started playing it the same way Hendrix did in live performances. My fourth video is Frizzle Fry by Primus. http://www.youtube.com... Primus have to be one of the most odd bands I've ever heard -- you don't come across a band with a lead bassist too often. Not only that, but their guitarist has some sweeping methods that are rather creative. A great song by a very interesting, innovative band. My final video for the round is Rhymin' and Stealin' by the Beastie Boys. http://www.youtube.com... Songs like this one make the Beastie Boys interesting -- it has their patented lyrical style, samples the Led Zeppelin song "When the Levee Breaks," but is sang more like a hip hop song than anything else. Such a combination is what makes the Beastie Boys kinda hard to categorize. Anyway, that's all for now.
Music Battle

http://www.youtube.com... "Nihilism" - Rancid (Sorry for the crappy audio quality) http://www.youtube.com... "I Wanna Be Your Dog" - Sonic Youth http://www.youtube.com... "Ball and Chain" - Social Distortion http://www.youtube.com... "Frontier Psychiatrist" - The Avalanches http://www.youtube.com... "I Was Born a Unicorn" - The Unicorns
Music Battle

I'm gonna start off with a little Frank Zappa -- the song is "I'm the Slime." http://www.youtube.com... A great song by a fantastic musician. Song number two is Death or Glory by the Clash. http://www.youtube.com... This is probably my favorite song of theirs -- it's so highly charged, and really, the lyrics epitomize the essence of the Clash. Third is Ice 9, by Joe Satriani. http://www.youtube.com... A good song by one of the better guitarists I know of. Fourth is one of the most epic songs I know -- Comfortably Numb by Pink Floyd. http://www.youtube.com... The video was taken from the movie "the Wall," which is an awesome trip, even when you're not high. And I picked to put this song last on purpose: the End by the Doors. http://www.youtube.com... It's a live version. I chose this specific version because...well, it's reminds me of how awesome the Doors truly are. They were the ultimate unified band; it was like they were one, individual entity. And now back to untitled_entity.
Music Battle

"Soothsayer" - Buckethead http://www.youtube.com... "Castration Rite" - Discordance Axis ---> Turn your speakers down. http://www.youtube.com... "Thriller" - Michael Jackson http://www.youtube.com... "Brat Pack" - The Rocket Summer http://www.youtube.com... "Let My Love Open The Door" - Pete Townshend http://www.youtube.com...
Music Battle

Ok. Thanks to untitled_entity for starting this debate. Song number one: A Quick One, While He's Away (live) - the Who. http://www.youtube.com... Quite frankly, I think this is the best performance I've ever seen. The energy and presence the Who possess on stage is simply stunning. This was, in essence, the first song to be composed of multiple songs, and carry a linear storyline -- it spawned concept of the "rock opera." My second song is one of the more memorable moments in rock and roll history -- the Bob Dylan "Judas" performance. http://www.youtube.com... It's taken from the ending sequence of the movie Martin Scorcese directed about Dylan -- "No Direction Home." A fan screams "Judas," at Dylan, to which he replies "I don't believe you; you're a liar." The best moment, I think, follows this just after -- he turns to his band, and yells "play it f-cking loud!" The performance that ensued was essentially a big "screw you" to the idiots who chastised him, and everyone knew it. Song number three is Bohemian Rhapsody by Queen...except it has a Lego music video. http://www.youtube.com... Fourth is the epic Led Zeppelin song How Many More Times. http://www.youtube.com... Fifth is some greatness from a guitar virtuoso -- Tender Surrender by Steve Vai. http://www.youtube.com... ...and that's it for now.
Religious Faith

I do not agree with your definition. All humans have values that transcend simple utilitarianism. For instance, would you execute an innocent man to prevent a crowd from rioting, potentially killing others? Of course not. If they do that, they are held responsible for their actions. Punishing innocent people is wrong, no matter what. The fact that many of these values are found in many religions only proves that religion is a major force for good. And again, we are not debating whether or not the bible presents unethical messages or whether religion has historically been a net source of evil or of good. We are debating whether religion today is a net force for good or evil. And just because Jesus's teachings are not original does not make them wrong. His teachings today inspire many people do virtuous things. Your really missing the point, the commandment condemns jealousy, and tells people to avoid jealous feelings. Back then, child abuse was not a big deal. It was everywhere, and part of society. Sure, but that was a long time ago. The question is whether or not religion is a force for good today. Many churches, synagogue's, and mosques run charity operations and many humanitarians are religious and use the bible for inspiration to continue their work. Many people use the bible as a moral code, and even if it does not come from god and these people are deluded, it still shows them how to live an ethical life. And as Carl Jung said, "The decisive question for man is: is he related to something infinite or not?" Spirituality is very important to humans and many people switch from theism to atheism or vice versa in their quest to understand their connection to the universe. Do you really think those people who believe in god because it keeps them happy by promising an afterlife,, do you really think it is evil? Foolish perhaps, but immoral? Because face it, all humans fear their death, you, I, and everyone else all fear the day when all our collected knowledge and experiences is lost forever, when we can no longer see, hear, smell, touch, taste, or think. Those people who rely on the afterlife to avert their fear of death, is that immoral? And people are very different. Some people are rational and empirical, some people intuitive and spiritual. I am assuming you are rational, so can you really say that those people are evil? Religion provides meaning and averts the fear of death, as well as providing a moral code and inspiration which allows people to do great things on this planet. Religion is a part of cultural heritage. Spirituality is important to many people. Could you really say that all of this is immoral? I don't think it is.
Religious Faith

I would define 'morality' as a human concept based upon questions about happiness and human suffering. This coincides with Sam Harris' definition in 'End of Faith'. I want to respond also to your questions about the Ten Commandments as a moral code. The first 4 commandments actually have nothing to do with 'morality' in terms of happiness or suffering. The 5th - 9th commandments are found in every culture throughout recorded history suggesting that this ideas about societal formation are more innate in the human species than anything else. The tenth commandment addresses 'coveting' of thy neighbors belongings including his livestock. One would seriously question whether the creator of the universe wouldn't have something more important to worry about than such an insignificant thought crime. Consider that no Old Testament laws forbid child abuse, for instance. This did not concern the 'creator'? Most people defend the teachings of the Christian faith by citing the teachings of Jesus; however, he taught nothing original. The Golden Rule, for instance, was taught by Zoroaster, Buddha, Confucius, and Epictetus. Those who cite the few good things that Jesus had to say tend to forget that the bible was used for 500 years to justify torture and execution. It can be interpreted to mean whatever the temporal authority wants it to mean and this is one of the inherent dangers of 'religious faith'.
Religious Faith

I am arguing pro, that religion is harmless. First I must say that I am a soft atheist, meaning I believe god does not exist because people who claim he exists have not provided any evidence and the burden of proof is on the one who asserts things. First, I am curious as to how you define morality. The bibles key messages, thou shall not kill and love thy neighbor do not strike me as negative messages. All instances of the bible being misused, the crusades, and the inquisition, etc, would be seen as abhorrent to any modern religious person. I doubt there are many Christians who would support another inquisition. Sure god has done some abhorrent thing, such as ordering the Hebrews to butcher every last one of the Canaanites, but that really isn't the point. Most religious people do not believe that act was justified. In addition, most modern wars are fought for oil and money, not religion. Most religious people, as naive as it is, feel connected and happy when worshiping. Do you really think that religion, something that provides meaning, is really a bad thing?
Religious Faith

I have an aversion to religious faith, meaning, I don't just look at it as a harmless mistaken belief. I look at it as a great moral evil. It sets up fallacious beliefs about God, creeds, ceremonies, rituals and prayer and it connects these things with the good of humanity or morality. These dogmas are then accepted as substitutes for real virtue. Religious faith encourages the worship of and obedience to an unknown deity, his only 'goodness' measured in something other than human terms. The Abrahamic God is completely immoral by any human standard.
Controlled Immigration

I will give him my feedback in the comments (tomorrow, as I am quite busy today), but would like to say that his argument was certainly very reasonable. Good luck to him in future debates. Now I will do rebuttal and my third argument. "if they want to have the same things we have here, they should do something in their country" 1) They can't. America has monopolized many markets through a system of patents and the world trade organisation. This has made them so wealthy that they have been able to buy controlling stakes in most of the R&D centers throughout the world. This makes it relatively impossible for other countries to get ahead. 2) If they could, wouldn't they have tried to do so already? 3) It doesn't fix the system - wealth and civil rights are different things. "we need to help out and look out for Americans who are having a hard time" 1) Americans are not having a hard time or a hard life. Look at mortality rates, literacy rates, prevalence of disease. .. the list is endless. America is by far the wealthiest country in the world. Thus my opponent must either claim that Americans are the only people worth caring about (which is racist and not worth my time responding to), or be incredibly ignorant about the current state of the world. 2) See my argument below for additional rebuttals on this point. Third argument It is no longer possible to simply say one is an American. Just because one lives in America, one can act as a citizen of any country in the world, using electronic communication. Governments have lost exclusive control of their citizens, thanks to global initiatives such as the international criminal court and global policing. Political boundaries are becoming increasingly pointless, just administrative zones doing the same work as a local council, on a larger scale. Therefore the status quo of movement restrictions is falling - people can often do the same thing without movement already. The only times that they cannot are when it matters most - to escape from a dangerous situation, save their life or desperately find work. Therefore the entire purpose of the immigration system is defeated, simply a drain on taxpayer's money. I conclude that governments have not the right or ability to control immigration. Controlled immigration is a drain on the world - a drain that is destroying lives, livelihoods and whole countries. My opponent has answered none of my points, reminding us of how hard working Americans are. Perhaps they are, perhaps they need help to. But that doesn't mean they get a monopoly on help. Everyone has a right to help when help is needed. Nothing makes Americans special. Therefore controlled immigration should be abolished. My counter model of uncontrolled immigration stands. Please, please, please .
Controlled Immigration

I appreciate my opponents rebuttal and thoughts on this topic of Controlled Immigration. Granted that we have many problems around the world that are causing trouble and problems globally and effecting each country differently. When you bring up your point about fundamental freedom of movement rights, the reason why our government has its holds and limitations of immigration is due to the desire for everybody to come to America. We already have a %12 unemployment rate for just Americans. Our government has this hold on immigration because our people should come first become foreigners. They have their systems in their own country and if they want to have the same things we have here, they should do something in their country that would advance them to the situation we have in America. We have to look out for our fellow Americans because they are the ones that have an impact on our decisions as a country and they have a meaning that helps our government. Now I'm not saying that foreigners don't have any importance because they do because we want them to come to America and have a good life but before they can come here we need to help out and look out for Americans who are having a hard time and give them a hand through a hard life. I don't have any more time to rebuttal you, I am very sorry. I have to go to school now and I wont have time because by the time that i can get back to this, it will be too late and i wont be able to finish it. I am sorry my worthy opponent. I really appreciate your time and effort you put into this. I hope i put up a reasonable argument for my first time. I would like you to finish your rebuttal even though i didnt get to finish. When you are done please give me some tips on how to get better at this debating process. I am very interested and i would like to learn everything I can. I am a rookie and i am looking forward to more debates with other people.
Controlled Immigration

I am impressed by your argument. What I mean by controlled immigration is that the people coming from all over the world have a legal citizenship that allows them to be here in America. The government isn't controlling immigration at all, we have all the illegals coming in from Mexico and all other countries that we don't even know about. What I'm arguing here is that controlled immigration should be accepted and illegal immigration should not be tolerated. Controlled immigration is a great idea for America due to the following reasons: 1) At times, immigration becomes a person's need. In case of personal reasons such as shifting a person's family, in case of a marriage with someone staying abroad and in case of family needs to move to another nation, a person is forced to move out of the country. The immigration laws that facilitate the migration of people between the two countries are of great help in such cases. 2) Immigration leads to an exchange of cultural values. It results in an exchange of knowledge and expertise between two nations. Immigration serves as an opportunity to interact with people of other countries. It gives a platform for people from diverse backgrounds to come together and share their views. 3) Immigration brings in new opportunities for the people of different countries. It exposes the people of a nation to the atmosphere of another country that may be very different from one's motherland. Immigration has resulted in gifting the knowledge of one nation to another, thus resulting in the creation of new fields of education and newer career options. 4) Immigration results in an open global market. It gives a global perspective to the social and economic growth of society, thus widening the horizons of the development. Supporters of immigration believe that immigration has the potential of bringing about a global prosperity. To summarize these advantages of controlled immigration is that it is simply better for global economy and to put it simple, our economy. We are able to advance in our business areas and dimensions as long as our personal lives. Although there are billions of people out there in the planet that live and breathe as you and I, America needs as many people as we can get. China has a population of one billion people and then some, in America, we only have 300 million people. Although this number is significant and a large number that seems so vast, it is not enough. India for example, their population is one billion and some change. Their economies are thriving right now. Two correlations are extremely obvious if you haven't noticed, China and India both have vast populations and have a enormous, booming economy. The United States has an OK economy,but its not as good as it could be. If people from all over the world want to come here, let them when they are legal and are willing to help themselves and the United States of America. I am looking forward to your rebuttal and dispute to my remarks.
Controlled Immigration

i have to be pro for this for my debate and discussion class in college and i thought this would be a good idea so if you see this, even if you are for controlled immigration, please be con or against so i can actually get better at debating, it would also be great if you guys could give me advice about which sites to find information about debate topics for future reference. SO.........................i am pro for controlled immigration due to the fact that this behavior is controlled. I am not for illegal immigration but when these people come into our country and have earned thier citizenship and worked really hard in order to be here, then it is fine with me. What is not ok with me is where these immigrants are given rights over us like they get put ahead of us in social security or when they are given free medical care and our taxes end up paying for it. this is not to be tolerated because we Americans have lived here for our entire lives but when they get the benefits over us, this action crosses over an invisible line that has been established since our country was created in 1776! When the industrial revolution was in its big boom we had thousands of immigrants coming into our country and they created hundreds of problems like disease, taking jobs and creating unemployment in the American public. It may seem harsh but i believe that hard working americans that have busted thier butts should get jobs over incoming immigrants. the only reason why owners of stores and businesses pick immigrants over americans is because they would work for less (im of course talking about the industrial revo still, not todays society) today we have thousands of mexicans who are looking for a good place to live and raise their kids so they come accross our border and make money then go back and give the money to thier fmailies, i believe they should wait in line to get a green card just like verybody else and get thier american citizenship, its not fair to the people of the united states this is not what i actually beleive, again i have to defend this side for my class so everything i said isnt wwhat i beleive