The United States should replace Obamacare with a universal Medicare for All System

Challenged Premise: Everyone needs to be under one universal healthcare system.This is a United States specific debate as clearly stated in the resolution, "The United States should replace Obamacare with a universal Medicare for All System." Not one of my opponent's arguments relate to the United States. I asked specifically, why does everyone need to be under one universal healthcare system? My opponent never answered it. This is clear at this point my opponent has lost the debate. He has created solutions to something that has no problems. My opponent is arguing for the sake of arguing. My opponent has not offered any statistics on how many people are uninsured in the United States since Obamacare has been implemented. Obamacare allows any person to get health insurance who needs it at a relatively low price. My opponent did not offer anything dispelling how Obamacare does not satisfy the needs of people who need healthcare. My opponent did not offer us any cost estimates of this universal healthcare overhaul either. In fact, my opponent has not offered any statistics related to the United States at all. I would state emphatically, my opponent has not offered any premise to stand on. My opponent did not show there was a need for a universal healthcare system at all. I have shown that Obamacare makes healthcare available to anyone willing to spend a little bit of money."Argument 1: Countries with universal healthcare have the highest iHDI (inequality-adjusted human development index). Argument 2: Countries with universal healthcare spend less per capita on healthcareArgument 3: Despite spending less per capita on healthcare, countries with universal healthcare have higher life expectancies" This is an appeal to popularity, "just because other countries do it so should the United States[1]." It is fallacious to say the least. [1]http://www.nizkor.org...;Debunking Pro's Arguments:#1 The United States is the most dominant country in the world, not Norway, not Germany, not Australia, not the Netherlands, not Sweden, not Denmark, not Canada, and certainly not Iceland. Who controls the World Bank with the most shares[2]? Who has the most votes in the IMF[3]? Who leads the largest military agreement in the world, NATO[4]? Where do most of the Fortune 500 companies come from[5]? Who has the world's largest economy[6]?Who spends the most on foreign aid[7]?The answer to all of these questions is simple, the United States. The other countries my opponent refers to are inconsequential and hardly play a role in global affairs. Inequality is merely the result of being so great. If the United States was medicore and ranked high on that list, the United States wouldn't be leading a single one of the statistics I just offered. Those countries are medicore and are synonmous with being water carriers.[2]http://www.worldbank.org...[3]http://www.imf.org...[4]http://www.history.com...[5]http://fortune.com...[6]http://www.wnd.com...[7]http://www.theblaze.com...#2 The United States does not control its' healthcare industry. The United States only subsidizes health insurance companies with Obamacare. Unlike countries with universal healthcare, private firms spend as much as they wish on healthcare. #3 Correlation is not causation as those who deal in statistics will often state. None of the statistics my opponent offers prove that high life expenctacy is the result of universal healthcare. None of my opponent's data include lifestyle or diet. How do we know lifestyles and/or diets cause high life expenctacy? My opponent just tells us, high life expentacy is the result of universal healthcare. This is simply not true, this is just merely correlation. None of my opponent's data point to the exact cause of high life expentacy, we only see correlation. Correlation is not satisfactory. A universal healthcare system does not change American consumption levels. Universal healthcare also doesn't mean reduced stress. It would be far more authoritative for someone to state that Americans should eat and live like Canadians and Japanese or these European countries Pro mentioned. Why? Their diets and their consumption levels are significantly different than Americans[8][9][10]. Universal healthcare would not stop obesity.[8]http://www.fredericpatenaude.com...[9]http://www.livestrong.com...[10]http://renegadehealth.com...;Vote con.