Skyim is the worst in the series with or without mods.

Yes the dragonborn can be replaced but how long will that take? Miraak won't be able to defeat Alduin and you would know that if you played trough the dlc. Tell me when the next dragonborn will appear. If you talked to the characters in the main quest they all sound a bit stressed and always demands you to go on a place in the fastest way possible. Almost like they are in a hurry. It's also rare for more than one to appear in a era. Will the other dragonborn be born in time? I think not. I took Dx:hr as an example and you knew that. Don't act like you did not know.But I know why you took my example so seriously. Notice viewers that my opponent did not mention my Dark brotherhood arguments and instead took a example that he made into a whole new argument. But I know what you are gonna do in the last round. You are going to say why you didn't think the black brotherhood was bad in the last round so that I won't get to give you an argument. "Your argument for why Skyrim is the worst Elder Scrolls game is that you thought dual wielding was silly." No it is one of my many reasons why I think Skyrim is the worst Tes game. Yes the briarheart might be one of the hardest enemies but that does not make me laugh when I see them. If you had enough knowledge about how double wield works you might also be one that laughs. What is the point of that freedom? Think about it. Yes I get to choice if I want to be a werewolf or not but that choice does not really matter does it? It does not and here is why. Choices only matters when they make an impact on something. If they don't they are useless. Think about it! It's such an useless bit of freedom that Bethesda could have forced a player into being a werewolf and it would not matter to the player. So you mean that the fast travel is something that you have to use in order to not get bored of the game? That it should be used in a certain way? I agree. Bethesda did not really think about us that does not like fast travel. Skyrim does not support all playstyles. Skyrim does not support those who enjoyed going into adventure in morrwind without that feature. Okay so you and I agree on that point. That the towns are nothing more than hubs. Bethesda knew this yet they said in one of the demos that the towns would feel alive. You know what? The real game should be in towns, out in the wild and in the dungeons. Have you ever roleplayed in Oblivion? If you have you know why it is so important to have living breathing towns and how much fun it could be. I'm a slow paced gamer. I could spend hours in anvil. Just in the day go out and have myself an adventure that I could not forget and later before 8 p.m I would go in the town, have a chat with the people and then sell my stuff and go to bed. Same with morrowind and even Online. I could do that in Skyrim but it is not as fun as in titles before it and after it because of the town and The NPCS boring one liners. "while that might suit your roleplay". Let me correct you there. It suits one of my many roleplay styles. You see when I play Skyrim I always play different characters (that all ends up being dragonborn). One time I might play as a good guy. Another time I might play as an corrupt Imperial and one time I tried to play as an assassin. Bethesda should support all playstyles like Morrowind did no question about it. Yes the Npc can get kill by a dragon but if the player could get past the essential wall that would be great. Yes I would get a pretty empty world not like that matters to Bethesda, you or anyone. It only matters to me that I can enjoy the game without repeating a playstyle that I have already used. Yes it makes the quest list rather small but that is what is great with the freedom that you have mentioned plenty of times. Freedom is only good if the choices that I make matters if not the freedom might as well go out the window. Okay then. ESO is part of the series but it is a great game for what it is. A mmo. The cities in that game feels even more alive than what Skyrim's cities does. Also mmos have sequels. Yes I have opinions but I also brought you facts for an example. Mmos have sequels. Skyrim does not support all playstyles. That the real game should be everywhere. Skyrim towns does not feel like towns. That the dual wielding is silly. (Learn how people actually used dual wielding before arguing). That the freedom that skyrim offers is limited and choices often don't matter. You want me to take other Tes games as an example? Morrowind gave you freedom that made an impact depending on what choices you made and while most NPCS were boring you will find more interesting characters than all Skyrim put together. Map also offer a much more fun exploration because you can actually go and explore all direction and always find something interesting without a mountain in the way or a ton of water. I also want to say that it was paced in a good way. You start off as a weakling and later can defeat gods. Eso is an great Mmo that give more freedom than any other mmo ever have. Well that was my first debate! Thank you for accepting. I tough that it was quite fun.