Wearing no facial hair is not manly.

( I reply in caps because it's easiest for me) 1: The wearing of facial hair is a sign and the start of a transition from a child to a man. SO ARE STINKY ARMPITS. Beards are a sign of manliness and of a natural adornment of what a man should be. Body hair and facial hair is what separates a man from a boy and what asunder a man from a woman. Body hairs and facial hair are the confirmation of manliness and affirmation of a masculine identity for male adolescents beginning their transition from a boy to a man. Beards are a natural feature of the masculine sexuality. NO. BEHAVIOR IS WHAT MAKES A MAN A MAN. THERE ARE PLENTY OF MEN WHO HAVE LUXURIANT BEARDS BUT HORRID BEHAVIOR. THE BEARD DOES NOT MAKE THE MAN. SOME MEN ARE NOT, (FOR LACK OF A BETTER WORD ) HORNY. THEIR BEARDS DO NOT MAKE THEM SEXUAL. SOME MEN ARE, NATURALLY, NOT HAIRY BUT ARE PLENTY SEXUAL AND SOME WOMEN ARE HAIRY BUT LOVELY. 2: Facial hairs are a symbol of respect, status and honour. NOPE. THE JUST GROW THERE, WITHOUT ANY THOUGHT WHATSOEVER. RESPECT IS EARNED, NOT GIVEN AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A BEARD. PLENTY OF MEN ARE TOO POOR TO GET TO A SINK TO SHAVE. SO, THE BEARD HAS NO STATUS WHATSOEVER. Too facial hairs are a sign of ferocity and fierceness expected from a man. NOPE. PLENTY OF WIMPS ARE WAY-HAIRY it is a representation of embracing the "inner animal" of the man. ARE YOU EXPOUSING POOR BEHAVIOR? in ancient times, ancient Egyptian pharaohs, though clean-shaven, wore false beards as a sign of imitating the god Osiris' divinity and divine reign and was mainly associated with religion (http://mentalfloss.com......). NO. EGYPTIANS REMOVED THEIR HAIR DUE TO SAND LICE. Throughout history, the wearing of beards by men is commonly associated with virility, masculinity, manliness and everything associated of what constitutes a man and even common in middle Eastern peoples, times during the Old Testament and even on Europe with the celtic and gallic tribes (http://www.academia.edu......). ASSOCIATION DOES NOT ENSURE ACTUALITY. 3: Wearing no beards is commonly seen as being associated with effeminacy and having an appearance of clean-shaven implies of having an appearance of a woman. AND YET, THE PENIS IS, STILL, THERE AND SO IS THE "ADAM'S APPLE" Though there are cases of beaded women, this has more to do with genetic anomaly and is not frequent among most women. Having no beards is a sign of meekness, weakness, gentleness and being soft. THIS "SIGN" HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE, ACTUAL, BEHAVIOR. In the Old Testament times, cutting off a beard is a disgrace (2 Samuel 10:4) AS IF ANYONE CARES TODAY and cutting off a bird along with rent clothes was a symbol of mourning (Jer. 41:5, 48:37). THERE ARE PLENTY OF WAYS TO MOURN 4: Now many might contend that true manliness lies in the intents of the heart and thoughts of the man, THE HEART IS A PUMPING MUSCLE FOR BLOOD AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH EMOTION I doubtlessly agree with this but it does falsify the proposition that wearing no facial hair is "not manly". SO, WHY PULL IT UP AS A DEBATE THEN? It might be contended too, that what you expresses outside of your character means of bringing out of what is inside you. THIS IS A TOTAL "MAYBE". SPOT THE PSYCHOPATH AND MAKE NO MISTAKES IF YOU CAN GUESS WITHOUT ERROR. Beards are just merely of an expression of the true manliness you're concealing inside you- respect, honesty, love, patience, truth and virtue. THIS IS STYLISTIC CONJECTURE/YOUR OPINION AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE, ACTUAL, BEHAVIOR OF THE MAN. BEARDS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HONESTY. BEARDS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH PATIENCE. BEARDS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH VIRTUE. MANY, ANCIENT, PEOPLE'S REMOVED HAIR FOR HYGIENE-REASONS, NOT FOR STYLE-REASONS. WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE AMOUNT OF FOOD THAT CAN GET CAUGHT OR LOOK AT "BEARD-RINGWORM" YOU CAN SEE THEIR POINT