I claim the existence of God

Rebuttles:Con states:I, by no means, say that The laws of conservation of mass and energy have ever been broken. The singularity contained all the mass and energy in the Universe. No God is required to break these laws, because these laws were never broken. Con attempts to fool the reader by making an argument out of ignorance. He says that energy and matter exist so they must always have existed. Con falsely assumes that matter and energy has always existed so he could avoid the question of creation. He also says that no God was necessary for creation, but if that were true then one must guess that all matter just existed. The logical explanation of how matter and energy came into being is through a single originator that is called God. Con states:The definition of God is not singularity and the definition of singularity is not God. They are not the same things. I said that these thing share common characteristics, and that God embodies the characteristic of the singularity that Con described. I will retract my statement that God is not directly the singularity for the sake of appeasing Con's apparent dislike of that definition. He even went on to say One of the first rules of the debate was no semantics and no BS definitions. That does not mean that the singularity is not the product of God. God created the singularity that shows intelligent design. Everything that came from the singularity created the universe and set natural laws in place. In this way God through a singularity gave the universe his divine design, and he also was controller of the universe through the laws that were within the singularity. Con states: An originator is not a creator. Ice cubes originate from water. Water is not a creator of ice cubes. An originator is something that causes the existence of another thing. I agree that water does not make ice cubes, but water does allow for the presence of ice cubes, just as God allows for the presence of the universe. Con states:There is no evidence that proves the singularity was a product of God. Science can't answer where the singularitycame from, but that doesn't mean a God made it. That's a logical fallacy called an "Argument from Ignorance"It basically says, if science can't answer where it came from, a God did it. There is proof that the singularity came from God. It had to be created from somewhere outside of time and from something that could break the laws of conservation of mass and energy. That is not an "argument from ignorance". The argument is that we know that the singularity was created by something with those characteristics I described. Anything that has that ability fits the definition of God. It does not mean that I can prove God's exact characteristics, but rather that I can prove that a god must have existed, by definition. Con states:The probability that an ice cube can form at 32 degrees Fahrenheit is 100%. That doesn't mean God makes ice cubes. There's nothing intelligent about the design of an ice cube. It happens on its own, just like the Universe itself happened on its own. God defined the laws that allowed ice to freeze. Therefore God allowed for the creation of ice cubes. Without intelligent design the water would no be able to freeze because the quantum mechanics would not be present. The universe would be chaos if left to chance. Con states:You can not keep claiming "God did it" Every time you don't have the answer to something. It is at this point that con has not even attempted to rebut my argument. This argument is none existent and so should be ignored. Conclusion: Con has attempted at multiple points to ignore vital parts of his argument. He has avoided the question of creation by ignoring it and assuming that matter and energy always existed. I have showed through scientific laws that a God must exist otherwise the universe could not come into existance. Only a God-like entity could break the laws of science, and since he/it was the creator of the universe he/it would be able to create the scientific laws that are present today. In this way God rules over the universe through the laws that he created such as the laws of conservation of mass and energy.1. A God must have existed in order to create things in spite of the laws of conservation of mass and energy.2. A God must have existed in order to endow the singularity with the intelligent design that the universe possesses.3. A God controls the universe through the laws that he has endowed the singularity to create, such as gravity, motion, and quantum mechanics.4. All things must be created from something else therefore there must be an originator that is commonly defined as God.