Why would anyone "want" to believe in god? Count all the people god wants to murder

I don't think you accurately understand the Christian view point regarding the Mosaic Law and I ran out of space to go into further depth. So I'll post a quote from Galatians 3: "19 What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed (Jesus)should come to whom the promise was made; and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one. 21 Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law. 22 But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. 24 Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor." This is pretty clear. The law served to educate people regarding what God considered righteous. It also served to protect God's people and keep them relatively separate from the depravity of the surrounding nations. Eventually the Law would run its course to completion with the arrival of Jesus, after which people would be released from the Law of Moses and transferred to the Law of Christ. That's really what being Christian is all about. Christians realize that a righteous standing could not be fully achieved under a system of Animal sacrifices because the blood of animals could never buy back humanity from the Sin of Adam. Adam was a perfect human and the only payment that could buy us back was the life of another perfect human; Jesus. You can disagree with this, but don't try to whimsically dismiss the beliefs of Christians because it doesn't fit your narrative and think that you've settled the debate. I'm providing the Christian Justification for freedom from the Mosaic Law under Christ. The Mosaic Law established the foundation in which the Ransom Sacrifice of Jesus could be realized by mankind. God original purpose of the Mosaic Law concluded with the Christ. The Jews were in expectation of the Messiah because their religion foretold his arrival. God's did give permission for Jesus to fulfill the Law. God even said upon Jesus baptism, "this is my son, listen to him." I am not 100% false in any sense. That's like saying I'm wrong for having an opinion, preposterous. While you may want to give me a strike, you might find a great number of people who disagree with you and find that my explanation is sufficient justification for my stance against Christians being obligated to go around killing unbelievers for not observing the Sabbath of the Mosaic Law. Your video link doesn't work on my computer. Furthermore, claiming that I am misinterpreting scripture is no more effective as me making the same claim against you; at this point without a complete breakdown of the entire context of the bible it just devolves into mud slinging. Besides this is a debate of differing opinions, why should we share the same interpretation. I just hope this debate can aspire to something more sophisticated than two kids on a playground yelling, "No, you're wrong." Now in regard to parents, like a father, raping their children, like their own son. You contradict yourself. The law condemned such homosexual action under penalty of death. In fact all fornication is punishable by death. In regard to rape Deuteronomy 22: 23-27 stipulates that as long as the victim screamed out and opposed the action only the rapist would suffer the penalty of death. I sincerely hope you don't argue against killing rapists. If you asked the fathers whose daughters were sexually assaulted by that Olympic team doctor what should happen to a rapist they would likely agree with the Bible's policy in the Mosaic law. I'd caution you to be more careful as you seem to run the risk of employing several logical fallacies, in your arguments; fallacies like Ad Hominems (out right attack of character), false dilemmas(because the Sabbath Law doesn't apply to those who don't ascribe to it), slippery slopes, and hasty generalizations(since you aren't considering the other laws that prevent the outcomes of child rape you mentioned.) You are cherry picking and misrepresenting the Mosaic law for your own purposes and I'm concerned that the audience will easily see through it. I think you are better at this than to rely on such underhanded methods. Don't try to take my words out of context. People can just scroll up and see It was in reference to wanting to kill your parents. The sword Jesus spoke of between family members was not about Christians wanting to killing their family members, but of disagreement. Any desire of killing would come from the unbelieving family member since Christians are commanded not to take up the sword and kill. (Matthew 26:52) Rather Christians are instructed to maintain fine conduct in the case family member or anyone else should disagree with their beliefs (1 Peter 2:12, 3:1,2) God has asked that followers of Christ simply prioritize the prospect of a righteous standing before God above an accepted standing before one's fleshly relatives. As Christians we will suffer the loss of approval from our fleshly family if it means gaining a spiritual one. As for Jesus ruling and Judging over the the twelve tribes of when he sits on his throne. You fail to consider the entire context. Jesus established a new covenant with a new Israel in anticipation of God rejecting the Jewish system after the Jews would reject his son as their messiah. Romans 2:29 makes it clear that the physical circumcision required by the Mosaic Law that identified an Israelite was obsolete. Inclusion into a greater Israel required a figurative circumcision of one's heart by spirit instead of written code (the Mosaic law). The entrance into the Kingdom of God as rulers with Jesus was opened to people of the nations. As for approving the Law: The Jews approved of it when they made a covenant with God. Jesus had little to do with the Jews acceptance of the Mosaic law. But then God dissolved the contract/covenant when it's original purpose was realized. The Jews, as a nation, may have decided to reject Jesus but that does not obligate God to uphold the contract. The terms were complete and it was effectively resolved. It's like if you enter a contest to win a certain house as a prize. Once you win if you decide you don't like the house it doesn't obligate the other party to provide you with a different house. Anyway, there is no major hypocrisy here. Simply a bit of forgivable super massive ignorance on your part in regard to MY Christian beliefs. I don't think there is overwhelming cause to terminate the debate. You may have not convinced me you are right, but that isn't necessarily the point. The point is to convince all those who might view this debate. There is more to be discussed and I don't think you are so cowardly as to run away because you're run into a bit of an impasse. Are you? Here's a bit of an argument for you: You are trying to tell us what God wants to do by saying he wants to kill countless people. In effect you are trying to put words into God's mouth. 2 Peter 3:9 states that God does not want any to be destroyed but for all to attain to repentance. Surely you recognize the the evils committed by people all around the world. It is God's desire that people should stop doing these things, but as I mentioned earlier, we are independent, so it's up to us to choose. It's true that countless people will die because that is the eventual course sin leads to. We live in an interesting time to say the least. As if we are conducting an experiment. An experiment to test whether beings of free will can succeed independently of God and his standards of right and wrong. How is it playing out so far? It sucks. God didn't want this for us he put us in a paradise because just like any loving parent he wanted us to have an enjoyable and comfortable life and home; he loves us. But, we messed it up. Our Ancestors Adam and Eve chose to sin, but we didn't; we simply inherited the rebellion. It's not fair, God knows this, so he made provision for us to escape. The Mosaic Law was one step in that provision which led to Jesus, the promised seed, foretold in the very first prophecy of the Bible in Genesis. Christians want to believe in God not because he threatens us with death but because he wants us to survive. Christians recognize what the Bible says as truth and seek to further understand by seeking to grasp the contextual bases for what is said rather than dismissing parts as contradiction. I don't know how religion wronged you or why you appear to be so angry with God. You may think that you are trying to reveal truth to people, but I am not convinced you have it. I also ask, what is accomplished when you are successful in turning someone to the same animosity you posses? You simply extinguish the light of hope someone once had and pull them into the darkness of the world. The world has no real solution for it's problems. It is a painful meat grinder. There is no hope with this society of mankind independent of God. Christians find working solutions to the worlds problems in the teachings of Jesus as well as hope. You may find satisfaction in your hate and anger toward the Bible, or even in the idea that you could be right. Christians are happy. And I wouldn't trade that for what you have. Also, I am convinced you are wrong, so chew on that. *Side note: When I mentioned the Palestinians and Jews handling the ARK I was referring to the ark of the covenant. A box that contained a golden jar of Manna, the stone tablets of the 10 commandments, and Aaron's rod that budded.