It is more likely that god exists than that he doesn't exist.

I accepted this debate on the belief that my opponent was being serious. Unfortunately, it seems my opponent intends this to be a jest. I hope my opponent truly hopes to debate this seriously. First, a negative case. A. God either can or cannot create a stone he cannot lift. B. If God cannot create such a stone, then God is not omnipotent. C. If a stone can be created which God cannot lift, then God is not omnipotent. D. Therefore, God is not omnipotent. E. If God exists, then God is omnipotent. F. God does not exist. A. If God exists, then God is omnibenevolent. B. If God exists, then God is omnipotent. C. An omnipotent omnibenevolent force would eliminate evil. D. Evil exists. E. No such force exists. F. God does not exist. A. If God exists, then He is all-knowing. B. If God is all-knowing, then he knows where in my bedroom I might see an invisible pink unicorn. C. ? ?? ?? D. Non-existence of God Now, for brief refutations. (1). The first premise contradicts my opening case. Either reason exists or God exists. Reason, therefore, not God. (2). The first premise is an argument from authority. . http://fallacyfiles.org... (3). Conception is not reality. Counter-examples include dreams and fantasies. (4). See (3). (5). This relies on equivocation (. http://fallacyfiles.org...) of the word necessary and the statement that God is necessary. (6). This relies on correlation fallacy. (. http://ddofans.com...) (7) This is a false dichotomy (. http://fallacyfiles.org...) and an Argumentum ad Ignorantiam (. http://fallacyfiles.org...). (8) Argumentum ad Metum (. http://en.wikipedia.org...) (9) Non-sequitor (10) Argumentum ad Ignorantiam (11) Argumentum ad Populum . http://fallacyfiles.org... (11b) Non-sequitor (12) Equivocation (. http://fallacyfiles.org...) (13) See 2. (14) Non-sequitor (15) See 12. (16) Non-sequitor (17) Begging the Question, Equivocation (18) Non Causa Pro Causa . http://fallacyfiles.org... (19) Argumentum ad Consequentiam . http://fallacyfiles.org... (20) Argumentum ad Nauseam . http://en.wikipedia.org... (21) Contradiction between premises. (22) Ad Hominem (. http://fallacyfiles.org...) and Red Herring (. http://fallacyfiles.org...) (23) Non-sequitor (24) Non-sequitor (25) Non Causa Pro Causa (26) Begging the Question (. http://fallacyfiles.org...) and Appeal to Ignorance (. http://fallacyfiles.org...) (27) Non-sequitor (28) The law of parsimony (. http://www.thefreedictionary.com...) begs to differ. If God can neither be proven, nor disproven, then God probably does not exist. (29) Conclusion contradicts the premise. (30) Non Causa Pro Causa and Non-sequitor. (31) Non-sequitor (32) Argumentum ad Verecundiam . http://fallacyfiles.org... (33) Non-sequitor (34) Equivocation (35) Non Causa Pro Causa and Non-sequitor (36) Wishful thinking and unwarranted optimism; Begging the Question (37) Non Causa Pro Causa (38) Non Causa Pro Causa (39) Non Causa Pro Causa (40) Non-sequitor (41) Begging the Question; Non Causa Pro Causa (42) Argument from Authority (43) Appeal to Ignorance (44) Non Causa Pro Causa (45) Unwarranted Analogy (46) Non-sequitor (47) Argument from Authority; Appeal to Unrelated Consequence (48) Non-sequitor (49) Argumentum ad Populum (50) Non Causa Pro Causa I now yield to my opponent.