BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Catholics make great christians if they get saved

If a person is saved, they are saved from their sin, they are saved from their death, and they are saved from Hell. They have eternal life now, their sins are forgiven now, and they know that the moment their time in their body of death is finalized, they will be with the Lord Jesus Christ forever and will be forever changed into His likeness freed from sin. A saved person knows for sure that all of their sins, past, present, and future (if God gives them more time in their body of death) are forgiven. A saved person knows that the moment their body expires, they will be in heaven because their sins are completely forgiven now, paid for by God Himself by His blood on the cross.Catholics make great Christians if they get saved. My opponent can argue that Catholics do not make great Christians if they get saved or that they are already Christians, or that they are saved. I will argue that they are not saved and they cannot be Christians when they are not saved. I will also argue that they make great Christians if they get saved because they are completely changed if they get saved.I now welcome my opponent's opening argument.
Does everyone know the meaning of Love

Hello! My name is Wilson and I am excited to start this debate. I am very young but I believe that I have a good point of view on what the true meaning of love. Love is something that is great, but it can sometimes be awful. Love can bring you up, and make you feel amazing. It can cause many emotions that will have you wanting more of it. Love is something that a lot of people don't want to talk about because they have experienced an event that has changed their point of view on the topic. Whether you got cheated on, your lover passed away while you two were still together, or your lover treated you badly by either mentally, physically, or emotionally abused you. All of those reasons could cause a shift of view. I have had my fair share in a serious relationship, and it just caused so much stress, anxiety, and I have developed trust issues. With all of the bad reasons that some people may not be willing to give love a shot, you must look at the other side with the people who are just so into love that they are willing to give it a try again, and again, and again. In my opinion, the true meaning of love is to wait and find that one person that you KNOW God brought to you, and to treat he or she as your partner in crime. You need to treat our partner as you would yourself. If you are religious, then you should revolve your relationship around that religion. If you are a Christian, then you should but God first in your relationship, and that he will support and make sure your relationship strong, and amazing!
Religion in public schools

First of all I do not believe that "if you act a certain way your going to hell" the catholic church and I believe if you have a love for others, do not judge others, and treat everyone equally God will reward you and show you the love that you give to others. Is this a bad thing to teach in public schools? Is their something offensive in this. I don't think so. "And now these three remain: faith,hope,and love. But the greatest of these is love"- 1 Corinthians 13:13
Religion in public schools

Your first argument that children need to be exposed to religion in schools so that they will be more accepting of others when they grow up is completely flawed. First of all, religion is so ubiquitous that it would be nearly impossible for a child not to experience it outside of school. Furthermore, Making religion commonplace in schools will draw unwanted attention to students who are nonbelievers and actually cause a lack of acceptance of nonbelieving students, especially because nonbelievers are very much minorities nationwide. As for your second argument mentioning the first amendment, a student does not have all of their first amendment rights while they are in school, even a public one. For example, students do not have a right to swearing, speech through social media while at school, wearing obscene or revealing clothes, reading or writing obscene material, inciting violence, etc.. If a student wants to do one of these things or practice religion they can be homeschooled or go to a private school which accepts these behaviors. If a student wants to practice religion they can be homeschooled or go to one of many, many religious private schools as well. Finally, your third argument that teaching religion in schools will help students make better decisions in life is by far the worst of all. Not only are the Judeo-Christian religions, which I assume you are referring to, not peaceful at all, but the notion that religion helps people make better decisions is extremely fallacious. As far as moral decisions go, if you need the threat of a vindictive god to not go around killing people than there is something wrong with you. People need to understand why right and wrong are right and wrong not just that they will go to hell if they don't act in a certain way. Church must remain separate from state.
Religion in public schools

I think religion in public schools should be allowed. People are free to practice their religion when and where they want. Why not in schools. For children that do not come from a religious background can learn about other peoples religion and other peoples views. Other reasons are: 1. Kids in school who experience religion that do not come from a religious background can be more accepting of others views when they grow up. 2.It states in the constitution that we have a freedom of religion and we can practice what we believe. 3. The teaching of a peaceful religion can help the kids make better decisions when they grow older.
Religion in public schools

"The righteous shall rejoice when he sees the vengeance. He shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked." (Psalms 58:10) "And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity: Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and woman: but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at my sanctuary. Then they began at the ancient men which were before the house." (Ezekiel 9:5-6) "And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain." (Deuteronomy 2:34) "And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made the man." (Genesis 9:5-6) "Every one that is found shall be thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them shall fall by the sword. Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished." (Isaiah 13:15-16) What a nice, positive message of love for the kids :) Look, I don't care what you believe just keep it out of public schools.
Kids having schools on weekends

I do support the idea of weekend school, however, the school day would need to have a time change, such as later starts and later ends. This way, the kids would still be able to sleep a long-ish amount of time and stay awake and focused at school. This idea would also allow kids to be able to stay in the groove of school, instead of getting all in the "dumps" Sunday night. Kids would be better focused, thus allowing them to perform better on tests they would have. Lastly, weekend school would allow less fortunate children to still attain a healthy breakfast and lunch if their parents or guardians are unable to. I hope the voters will see my points and vote for Pro! Thanks!
Gender and Sex are the same thing

Point 1 - WebsitesIf web developers are not the moral authority then why are they there for the world to see? Are the websites lying? Are they deceiving people? Should all websites change it to, "Sex - M or F" instead of "Gender - M or F"? I presume not because you mentioned "custom genders". Is there a such thing as custom sexes? Point 2 - Eye color analogyIn actuality your eyes are blue on the surface; superficially. The average earthling would view them as blue, But biologically they are brown no matter what. That is like a white person putting on a black mask and labeling themselves as black. Honestly speaking, Your eyes are not really blue. They are brown according to how you were born. "More to the point, Why is it okay to slander biology if I change my height, Eyes, Or hair color, But it's not okay when it comes to sex? "Risks for height: Damaging of the spine. Risks for eyes: Potential blindness. You can wash hair dye off. Say you color your hair purple. If you happen to cut off your hair, Your hair will still grow back black or brown (hypothetical; your original hair color) it will not grow back purple. It is not okay when it comes to sex because it is a knock towards human nature and reproduction, Thereby preventing the population from growing. Point 3 - Gender DysphoriaDo dogs, Cats, Fish, Lion, Gorillas, Horses, And birds have gender dysphoria? Have veterinarians diagnosed dogs? "Should deaf people refuse hearing implants and instead just accept how they were born? People have the right to change themselves; that includes gender reassignment surgery. "I believe blind and deaf people should revert themselves to gain hearing and sight. Those are positive solutions. People who go through gender reassignment surgery are doing the exact opposite. They are perfectly fine, As they do not have any disabilities such as a blind person. If they go through that surgery, They are going from natural to unnatural. Similar to a black person bleaching their skin. Not only is it unnecessary but it comes with risks such as skin cancer. Point 4 - Intersex peopleI believe intersex people have the right to choose their gender because from my understanding, They could be born with both male and female genitalia. If they go through surgery, Then that is okay. They were born intersex. However, Someone cannot be born transgender. It's unfair for a male to go through gender reassignment surgery. He should accept how he was born.
Gender and Sex are the same thing

This is my 3rd time having this debate, So I apologize if my first argument is derivative. I'm guessing based on your previous writing, That this will not be so easy for me the 3rd time around. Gender and Sex are not the same thing. The definition of the word "Gender" is not the same as the term "Biological sex". These are two different words describing two different things. Gender, As defined by the The American Psychological Association means: "The attitudes, Feelings, And behaviors that a given culture associates with a person's biological sex. Behavior that is compatible with cultural expectations referred to as gender-normative; behaviors that are viewed as incompatible with these expectations constitute gender non-conformity" [1]. Most dictionaries have updated their definition of gender to include alternative and/or fluid categorizations of gender. I don't want to argue semantics though. The heart of the issue is WHY did it change. Why should or shouldn't we support this new definition? ---First, Let's try and reach some common ground. I have prepared four (only slightly loaded) questions for my opponent:Question 1Bob got gender reassignment surgery; now she goes by Bobette. Bobette identifies as a woman. What is Bobette's gender? Should trans people have the right to identify with a gender other than their biological sex? If you don't think Bobette's "gender" has changed, Then how would you recommend she identify herself? Question 2I can get laser eye surgery to change my eye color from brown to blue (this is a real surgery). My DNA and biology would both insist that I should have brown eyes. Would you also insist on calling my eyes brown, According to what biology intended? Question 3Do you believe in Gender Dysphoria? This is a condition where people experience extreme distress because their gender doesn't align with their biological sex. If gender is psychologically incongruent with biological sex then why shouldn't these suffering people be allowed to identify as something else? Question 4What is your position on intersex people? As I'm sure you know, Not everyone is born strictly male or female. Some people are born with both genitalia. Some people are born with an XXY chromosome. Nature is messy and not strictly binary. Shouldn't we update our vocabulary to reflect this ambiguity? What's wrong with saying someone's gender is non-binary, For example? [1] https://www. Apa. Org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexuality-definitions. Pdf
The Redskins ought to lose games and play for a 1st round draft pick.

REBUTTAL: 1. Although I have nothing against Jim Zorn personally, a head coach is responsible for the team's successes and failures. Thus far he has not produced the results expected of the Redskins fans. I agree that Jim Zorn had an admirable career as a player, but it is common knowledge that the best players do not always make the best coaches. Although an article was published by the Washington Post stating that Zorn's job was safe through this season, it implied his tenure was not guaranteed beyond that. Generally, when a head coach is replaced, the new head coach prefers to bring in his own staff. 2. "The Redskins have lost 10 of their last 14 games and have been awful on offense this season. The team is averaging just 13.2 points a game and it has not scored more than 17 in any single contest. In addition, the Redskins rank 23rd in total offense (294.0) and are among the bottom third of the league in rush offense and passing yards (195.3)". (source: www. nfl. com) My reference to the defense pitching shutouts was an exaggeration due to the low number of points scored by the offense. 3. I will concede and stipulate both your point and source regarding cat overpopulation. :o) By finishing at bottom, the Redskins are assured of getting young talent that they desperately need. Many of the current players are past their prime and struggle to produce even mediocre results. Opponent's points: 1. It was inferred, not implied, that the Redskins would be sore losers. By playing, they would still be participating. Since they can't seem to beat the weaker teams in league, losing on purpose may be a moot point. 2. Teams often trade players, cash, and draft picks up and down the draft which also alters the draft. Strategic decisions are made in every business including football. 3. The fans are already mad. If they believe that a strategy is in place to fix the problems and start winning they will be forgiving. An article in Rivals. com stated that financially speaking, the Redskins are second only to Dallas. SUMMARY: I concur that good sportsmanship demands that every player give 100% on every play and that NFL players are role models whether they like it or not. Unfortunately, in the capitalistic society we live in, it is paramount that teams and coaches be ultimately successful. We all know that not only professional athletes, but even the common laborer do not give 100% every day. Strategic decisions occur daily with the intent of fixing problems. If it takes sacrificing half of one season to obtain better players, wouldn't be worth it in the long run? Thank you.
The Redskins ought to lose games and play for a 1st round draft pick.

This season is a wash. Except for NY, all of the Redskins' losses came against lame opponents. Contention 1: Jim Zorn and staff will likely be fired at the end of the season. Contention 2: This team has no reliable offense, and the defense cannot pitch shutouts. Contention 3: If the 'Skins win any more games it will drop them in the draft. The NFL would go ballistic and the fans would have kittens, but this is clearly the best way to get a better offense.
State-mandated administration of childhood vaccines is justified.

Topic: State-mandated administartion of childhood vaccines is justified. Rules:1. No Ad Hominem2. No plagiarism3. No semantics/abusive arguments4. Dropping = Conceding5. By accepting, my opponent accepts the given rules.5a. If not, post in comments. =/Definitions:1. State-mandatedMandated is defined as requirement, so this phrase means each state has requirements relating to medical and safety issues.2. Administartion Administration, in this case, relates to allowing the government to give permission and obligating to trained medical professionals to give a shot to you. 3. Childhood VaccinesA series of vaccines, biological preparation, given during childhood to prevent future diseases. 4. JustifiedFor debate purposes, it means that on balance, it does more good than harm to the people. Good luck to whoever accepts.
The Existence of God

Stubborn people like me will always claim to their beliefs no matter what and debating seems like a peaceful way to argue about them. I hope people vote on this debate with their beliefs and structure of the speeches. Again I would like to thank my opponent for this debate and wish him luck in his future debates, and I would like to thank those who read this debate as well and hope you'll got as much enjoyment as I did that is all. Vote to your beliefs and never let anyone take away what you believe in.
The Existence of God

"why do we live in a universe that operates by laws such as physics" Laws of Physics are not 'laws,' like the political laws you think of when you hear the term. Laws of Physics are simply observations based on what we've observed about the universe. Laws of Physics may not even be impossible to break, just very improbable. If physical laws were created, then why didn't the creator add additional laws such as laws to prevent black holes, natural disasters, asteroids from hitting Earth etc? "why do atheist always pursue the thought of god even though they claim not to believe in god" This isn't true for all atheists, but some atheists argue against the existence of God because they see it as a failed hypothesis or an outdated belief. Imagine you're Galileo in the 1600s, and you've just discovered that the planets orbit the Sun opposed to the Sun and the planets orbiting Earth. Wouldn't you try to show everyone the real truth, instead of have everyone continue to cling to outdated beliefs? Another reason some atheists argue against religion is because religion has and still continues to cause a lot of wars, conflict, suffering, and unfair laws placed on the People. Many religion-based laws still exist in the U. S. today despite the Separation of Church and State clause in the First Amendment. These laws are victimless crimes and only exist to force people not to do things that some people find distasteful. Religion-based laws are a lot more prevalent in the Middle East where almost every law is based off of religion, and many of the punishments are death. Religion has also slowed the progress of mankind, since the Church has opposed almost every scientific advancement, from the Sun Orbit discovery, to Evolution, to stem cell research. Religion also divides people and can cause racism and over-the-top patriotism. I think if there wasn't religion, humankind could be more united, peaceful, and could advance society greatly. Also, I don't see why atheists arguing against the existence of God is proof or evidence that God exists. I even see it as evidence against the existence of God, because one would assume if a God wanted his people to believe in him, he would hardwire the belief into them or show himself to the world. "Jesus claimed to be the son of god, and Jesus performed miracles such as healing people. " There have been historians living in the time that Jesus is said to have lived, yet none of them mention Jesus. You'd think that he would be know all over the globe if he could walk on water, turn water into wine etc, yet there is no mention of him except in the bible. Even if Jesus did exist, there is no guarantee that he performed 'miracles' during his life.
The Existence of God

my opponent has made many great arguments to counter my debate but there are still mystery's that remain that may prove gods existence 1. ) why do we live in a universe that operates by laws such as physics. 2. ) why do atheist always pursue the thought of god even though they claim not to believe in god 3. ) Jesus claimed to be the son of god, and Jesus performed miracles such as healing people. . http://www.everystudent.com...
The Existence of God

After a while of thinking over what my opponent said I am now ready to begin my round. My opponent said that it would be useless to talk about god being responsible for the universe because I would have to then explain where god came from, the same can be said about the big bang. Where did the big bang come from. I posted a video that speaks about the big bang and a little on evolution. http://www.youtube.com... Another counter argument my opponent posted was that science explains most things but agreed that there are still some things that science can't explain and that is why some scientists out there do believe in god, how do you describe miracles- an effect or extraordinary event in the physical world that surpasses all known human or natural powers and is ascribed to a supernatural cause. http://dictionary.reference.com... http://www.religionnewsblog.com... And how do you describe ghost if ghost are real then that must mean that there is an after life and if there is an after life there must be a god.