Higher Education ought to be private and indiviuals ought to pay for it themselves.

1. It's not point in Germany as country, Germany is given as example whats happens in countries which have no enough experts, which supports my argument 'Every country needs experts' as answer on your original issue 1. It's not all black and white with paying tax. Tax system is 'if you have a lot of money - you pays more, but if you have nothing you also pays nothing' and that's normal. Your education is paid from someone who is also got education paid from someone... On this way you are basicaly paying for your children's education. And there is always one thing- it's much more better that taxpayer's money goes for someone's education than to go on same 'dark ways'. When money goes for education you exactly know where money is going, so this reduces possibility for misuse. 2. Who can guarantee that the same thing will not happen if education is not free? Nobody! Even worse, you have to pay education and you have to returns loan but you don't have job or your job is underpriced! With private Universities you are not solving this problem, you just makes problem worse. Education is not like iphone. We are talking about serious things and you banalize this. Iphone is something that does not affects your future (your salary will not be addict to fact that you don't have iphone). There is always job for those who wants to work! 3. Your description of banks and loans means only one thing- THOSE WHO REALLY NEED LOAN CAN'T GET IT! All that you said means that poor people or alone student can't get a loan because it's risky. And I completely agree with bank's theory, it's normal. So in your system,where free University does not exist, I as alone student without parents support, can not get education. I didn't even got a chance! What more to talk about? 4. I don't know what happens there with private business, but here businessmen gets money from government to start up business. I don't know exactly how much they gets (it's depends on many things) but they get some kind of help from government. (For example, someone can request that country provide guarantee for their job abroad, and country often provide that) 5. Your issue 1 was explained. About issue 3:' In the face of competition, organizations will compete to create a better good at a lower price. This is a basic principle in economics. In this case, EDUCATION IS THE GOOD. By allowing the private sector, not the public sector, this good can be applied cheaper and better.' EDUCATION IS NOT GOOD IF IT'S NOT AVAILABLE TO EVERYONE! How educational system can be good when the main thing in the whole system are money?! Education is not for sale! Knowledge is not a commodity! About issue 4:'However, the government could also improve the economy by raising capitol instead, buying natural resources, or creating projects that create new goods. For example, the government could overspend on investing in labor, thus making the effects of higher education void.' And again - Knowledge is not a commodity! Education is not for sale! 6. I actually explained how Universities make sure that "bad students" do not enter or are removed from higher education in round 2, but I will write that again. Every university which is free for students have regulations which prevent 'ever study'. This means that there is a norm that every student must meet if he/she wants to continue education. If he/she doesn't meet norm education is not free anymore (except in cases of serious illness or another strong valid reason). This prevents problems such as 'bad students', 'dissatisfied teachers' and many others. Education is one of the most important things in people's lives. Every men are born equal and everyone deserve opportunity for better life! Knowledge is not a commodity! Education is not for sale!