God is omnipotent

Thanks for your 3rd round, Pro.Pro referenced the definitions, so I certainly will too.The agreed to definitions are pretty clear.*Omnipotence*Having unlimited power in terms of quantity and extent is not only the accepted definition for omnipotent in this debate, it most matches god's presumed ability to do ALL THINGS indicated in the bible.Remember, Pro was quite clear that the god in this debate "must be Christian God" (Pro, Round 1).Well, the bible's clear.God, according to the bible, most matches definition 1, able to do anything; able to do all things. Matthew 19:26:"And looking at them Jesus said to them, "With people this is impossible, but with God ALL THINGS are possible."http://biblehub.com...Job 42:1 + Job 42:2"Then Job answered the LORD and said, I know that you can do ALL THINGS; no purpose of yours can be thwarted."http://biblehub.com...http://biblehub.com...*Omnipotence Problem 1*I've tried to explain this concept to many a theist and they can't quite seem to understand it.The set of ALL POWERS, which omnipotence necessarily entails, must include powers that exist in opposition to each other.This is just one example, but an omnipotent entity MUST have the power to move anything.This entity also MUST have the power to resist (be immovable to) anything.But I'm not going to leave the omnipotence paradox right there, like most critics of omnipotence do.Instead, I'm going to point out that the set of ALL POWERS must also include the power to infinitely remain able to move anything and the power to infinitely remain immovable to anything.So, omnipotence necessarily includes:1. The power to move anything.2. The power to resist (not be moved by) anything.3. The power to infinitely remain able to move anything.4. The power to infinitely remain able to resist anything.5. The power to infinitely remain all powerful.If god has the power to move anything, #1, he therefore can move himself.This would violate #2, because he can resist anything, including himself.If god has the power to resist anything, #2, he therefore can resist himself.This would violate #1, because he can move anything, including himself.So many theists say, "well he can temporarily relinquish his ability to move anything and allow himself to be resisted."This however, would then violate #3, because he supposedly has the power to infinitely remain able to move anything and being resisted directly negates that; this temporary dip in power also negates the power to infinitely remain all powerful, #5.So, Pro, can god move anything and infinitely remain immovable?Pro, can god resist anything and infinitely remain irresistible?Pro has already said:"I am not saying those paradoxes don't exist."My response:That's because with omnipotence, they certainly do, if god is to contain the complete set of ALL POWERS, then he contains powers that negate or mitigate the other powers.*Omnipotence Problem 2*Here is a list of things that the god of the bible cannot do, and certainly Pro will agree.1. God cannot infinitely gain power.Because god supposedly has all of the power, he therefore cannot gain power or create more power to gain.This obviously cannot be done infinitely, because god can't even gain any power, let alone an infinite amount.2. God cannot physically demonstrate his existence without negating his existence.Being incomprehensible, due to infinite complexity, is yet another power in the set of ALL POWERS.For god to demonstrate his existence physically would mean for him to be comprehended in some fashion and this would negate his infinite complexity and his power to infinitely remain incomprehensible.3. God cannot act against his original intentions and choose freely.Being that god has the power to infinitely be correct, his intentions and subsequent actions are always correct.He therefore cannot go against his original intentions and act freely, instead he's LIMITED by his original intentions.4. God cannot fly.Being that god is superior to both gravity and air resistance, god cannot be susceptible to either force.Well, that's what the power to fly is.To admit that god could fly, would be to admit his utter submission to the laws of gravity and aerodynamics and that he needs to maneuver around them to travel distance in the air.5. God cannot encounter or solve difficult problems.Nothing is difficult for god, so god cannot solve difficult problems, in fact, god cannot solve problems, because he would never be able to encounter a problem.Encountering a problem would admit a lack of knowing how to solve something.God cannot encounter or solve problems because of this.*Omnipotence Problem 3*Pro feeds the contradiction:"Thus God is always limited to what He can become but still can be omnipotent."My response:Pro should reference the bible's understanding of god's powers, as that's the god that Pro demanded be argued in this debate and the god that the definitions most accurately reflect.If god is ALWAYS limited, then how is he unlimited in quantity and extent of powers?If god is ALWAYS limited, then how can god "do all things" as the bible clearly indicates?Pro, why would you include the definition of unlimited "not limited or restricted in terms of number, quantity, or extent" if you weren't going to bother to follow it?Your bible bothered to follow it; so should you.*Pro's Differential Perspective*Pro's DP is largely irrelevant to omnipotence, which is the topic designated for this round.But from what I can gather, Pro is basically saying that time "pressures" matter and space into a two dimensional plane on time's "river current" such that if a galaxy were to rotate within this river current, it would expand outward much faster than galaxies that have not rotated in the river current of time and that since there's a 5th dimension in which time doesn't exist, subatomic particles can exist outside of time, in that 5th dimension.Great, what does any of that have to do with god being omnipotent?Pro writes:"All of this being said is to attribute to the omnipotence of God."My response:Great, I fail to see the link, but maybe you can bring us to the point of all that?Pro adds:"Whoever invents backward Time Travel...can be created in the future, then go back to 1. put a neutron into nothing, starting the chain reaction of the Big Bang 2."My response:Why does an omnipotent entity need to go back in time or a neutron to create the universe?Shouldn't the power to create our universe sans time travel be possessed by an omnipotent god?Shouldn't the power to create our universe sans a neutron be possessed by an omnipotent god?The bible sure thinks so.So do the definitions in our debate.*Conclusion*The inherent contradictions are obvious.Having all powers contains negating powers, thus omnipotence is illogical.Pro can try all they want to ignore the bible and the agreed to definitions of the debate, but it is futile.The creator of a universe that wasn't created isn't unlimited in power in terms of extent and quantity.The resolution has been negated.