There is undeniable evidence that God exists

My opponent failed to provide *ANY* evidence that God exists. That's a far cry from being good evidence and certainly far from being undeniable evidence for God. My opponent noted a few things which science easy explained and supposes it to be unexplained and that because it's unexplained God exists. That's similar to the logic "I don't know how a microwave works, so clearly it must be run by fairies!" At the very least, even if somehow you ignored all the points I made against these arguments (note arguments aren't evidence, they are arguments) and think he made some good points. You must admit that I suitably deny such evidence and thus establish that it is deniable. By definition this proves the topic false. Con wins. In fact, my very position as Con demands that I deny any evidence submitted by Pro and thus negate the topic. I can't lose. However, regardless of this unburdened topic I still went to considerable thought and trouble to explain why Pro's arguments fail and did them due diligence. Please take this into your consideration. ----- Rebuttal to Round 2 Arguments. The fact that people die for a cult leader or Islam or for Le Resistance is exactly the point. The suggestion that people only die for true things is wrong. Christianity can be false even if people died due to their belief. The same holds true for any number of false beliefs. The Earth is a certain distance from the sun because all planets are certain distances from the sun. There's no requirement. The false idea behind this sort of Goldilocks logic is that Earth-based life, evolved on Earth so it's ideal for Earth. If Earth had larger swings in temperature or smaller, or colder, or hotter... life would have evolved differently. My hands must be designed because they fit so perfectly into my gloves! -- "Seasonal weather differences are caused by orbit of the earth. Perihelion is the point in which the earth is closest to the sun in January. Aphelion is where the earth is farthest from the sun 6 months later." You do know that the Southern Hemisphere has winter in July and Summer in January right? And that during the summer in the north the Earth is the farthest from the sun (the Apogee). When it's really really hot out in Virgina or California during July, the Earth is the farthest from the sun (more removed from the heat source). It has little to do with the distance and everything to do with the angle. We've discovered hundreds of other planets outside of our solarsystem. A couple within the habitable zones of other stars. If the processes to start life are simple, as seem to be the case, then we should find an okay chance that life arises on a vast number of different planets, within their specific habitable zones, in the millions of trillions of such planets likely to be found in the habitable zones of their stars. Of the heavenly bodies of this solar system we know of four that could have water, two of which we have confirmed have liquid water (Earth and Mars). Whereas other worlds like Titan have hydrocarbon rain and could support any number of alien life cycles. Then, on top of all of this... even if the Earth were a once in a universe occurrence, it would have no bearing on whether God existed or not! Earth could be amazingly improbable and it wouldn't provide one jot of suggestion that God must exist. Tectonic plates aren't needed for life. Mars doesn't have enough atmosphere to even briefly survive. It can't regulate its heat due to a lack of greenhouse effect (it could be made habitable with a bit of work). The core isn't molten anymore so it's largely dried up. It has very little methane and what little it has might actually be due to life existing on the planet already (there shouldn't be methane). Venus might very well have tectonic plates perhaps oceans too (not of water mind you). The point is that of just the 8 planets in our solar system, several are pretty close and one is known to support life. Other star systems have pretty good contenders, even considering the fact that we tend to only find the super-Jupiter systems. -- The human brain isn't that much more amazing than a chimp brain. We tend to transfer information between generations but other than that the same general functions apply, take that away away and we'll pretty much be our chimpy selves. Your brain-cutting example is flawed: If you cut the brain out of a monkey they will die too. Also, regardless how amazing the human brain is, it still evolved and has no bearing on whether God exists. http://www.talkorigins.org... The theory of evolution not only allows for such functional parts to arise but explains how they formed the way they did. However, again, even if I had no explanation which gives very good details as to how such things occur, the idea that God did it, *STILL* comes out of left field. How did you get there? You are noting some issue or problem or mystery, none of which are issues, problems, or remotely mysterious and supposing that they constitute evidence for gods. Its a total non sequitor. -- The world didn't start 6000 years ago. The geological and radiometric evidence suggests about 4.6 billion years ago. Also, not all past civilizations have had gods. In fact, there's a couple that don't even have a creation story. Many others that simply had the ancestors or mythical creatures. The existence of such diverse creation stories strongly suggests that there's something human about confabulating a concept of origins within any group. That suggests the monotheistic religions are equally likely to suffer from this sort of confabulation and be completely explained as myth without regard to any existing God. If everybody makes up stuff, then isn't that good evidence that God is really made up stuff too? -- We haven't stopped evolving. In fact, the latest data suggests we've evolved more in the last 10,000 years than any time in the last 100,000 years. Evolution never suggests we should turn back into anything. Simply that via reproduction, mutation, and the struggle for survival we should further adapt to fit into our niches. -- All of the Bible's fulfilled prophecies fall into one of four categories. 1) Prophecies which are vague and unspecific and have the "truth" read into them after the fact. 2) Prophecies from one part of the book which are fulfilled in another part. 3) Prophecies which are general and occur frequently throughout history. 4) Prophecies which, when dating is considered, could have been written afterwards. There are no specific, non-general, verifiable prophecies in the Bible. It's not a coincidence. To prove this allow me to make similar prophecies: - I will finish round 3 of this debate. - There shall be a winner. - Within the comments of this debate, somebody will make a comment which simply says "The sled was named Rosebud. Rosebud was the name of the sleigh!" - The blue man shall fill the emptiness. - I shall this round with the word "debate." - Barack Obama will become president next Tuesday. - There shall be more debates on this site. There shall be winners. There will be votebomber, Christians, debaters, teenagers, and the leader board shall shift! - LoveyounoHomo will accept my challenge to the debate "There is undeniable evidence that God exists." The prophecies are not difficult, they seem impressive and some seem specific, others are vague, and yet they are all accurate. They all fall into the same categories as the Biblical prophecies. So, prophecies like those in the Bible cannot be good evidence. I made these up on the spot and they are just as impressive. -- Constructing a person out of bits of another person isn't evolution, nor is making somebody out of clay. Further, even if those were considered evolution, why would that be undeniable evidence that God exists? -- Thank you for the debate.