The ELO system should be changed on DDO

FINAL ROUNDCherry picking debates to show that users are underrated or overrated? I did not cherry pick. Pretty much every page of STALIN's profile is against some noob.He only has a few even against remotely skilled debaters. It is up to my opponent to show that I in fact cherry-picked and show us that in reality STALIN really debates and wins against skilled debaters with elo similar to his. STALIN's won debates, almost every single page, shows him spamming and utilizing the current elo system the wrong way. [3][4][5] And keep in mind loads of his debates are "finish the sentence", which don't utilize debate skills at all! As for the underrated debaters, Envisage's profile shows him winning against debaters who otherwise are more skilled than him elo-wise [1][2]. YYW's debates show that he is amazing as well, [6][7][8] deserving more than his current elo. (The one against Larz shows how Larz is also underrated; in a debate about giving him the official title I mentioned he defeated mighty debaters with elo far far higher than him, so we know that Larz's skill is much higher than his elo gives, just another example to show how underrated users can be[9]. I didn't even mention that Larz managed to beat Zaradi, who has more than 1,000 elo more than him [10], he managed to beat some other guy with >1000 elo more than him [11], slayed another guy with over 4,000 elo [12].....he really should be called "beast slayer"!) I only highlight his most valiant and best victories for YYW/Envisage to note how strong they can be at their peak, I'm not cherry picking, you can access his profile to actually see for yourself who else he defeated that shows he deserves a higher elo. 2. Proposed change.Incorrect. The current system seems to give an advantage to the instigator only and the disadvantage to the contender only, not advantage-low-rated disadvantage-high-rated distribution."The moderators will not be able to individually tweak the ELO system for each individual debate and moderate at the same time."This change will only apply to future debates, they can just change the elo equation. How do you think they managed to create the elo system and keep track of all the users' elo?? The moderators definitely did not individually put an equation to each and every debate; they designed the code so that when a debate ended, the debaters' elo would change. Thus, it can be concluded that tweeking the elo is as easy as the start of the elo system, or even easier, since all the moderators have to do is to change a few numbers.I have shown that the moderators need to increase the advantage and disadvantage, as well as make the advantage apply to the one with lower-elo while the disadvantage to the higher elo. That would help solve both problems listed above.I think I have outdone myself and managed to strengthen my arguments from last time; and my opponent has failed to outdo ArcTimes.VOTE ME.[1] http://www.debate.org...[2] http://www.debate.org...[3] http://www.debate.org...[4] http://www.debate.org...[5] http://www.debate.org...[6] http://www.debate.org...[7] http://www.debate.org...[8] http://www.debate.org...[9] http://www.debate.org...[10] http://www.debate.org...[11] http://www.debate.org...[12] http://www.debate.org...