Bryan Mullins: The Roast Game Is Fact!

so let me get this straight, they get rid of their evidence? then how do you know if the theory is real or not? if their is no evidence, then you don't know if the children are actually eaten am I right? their is one point where your entire argument falls apart, how would they get rid of all the evidence, when the government could realize the children are missing, and mark them such as? You are acting hypocritical by stating I need new arguments, your entire debates have been rebutting mine, why don't you practice what you preach and give me some new info? by spelling your name, it is not looking up the "roasting game" it is looking up YOU, and your wikia, and everything else you made, because by confessing that your name is needed to show the evidence, it is now prove that, every video, every site, supporting this is just stuff made by him, making it false evidence, in order to get some legit evidence, get an outside source. that you DIDNT make. like that youtube video, from a channel that has your name "this is a poor argument, asking all these pointless questions, and using the same old burden of proof argument that doesn't work anymore" how are my questions pointless, I'm asking how can you explain a theory that has no evidence, that question pretty much has a point if you ask me. and how in the world is proof arguments pointless? it is one of the most basic factors in debates. "They freak out because they don't want to be caught or arrested by police. Where does it say that if they freak out, they are guilty? You misrepresented the wikia page. Now you misrepresented three things now, my first argument, my link to the Google search (includes my name), and now, the wikia page. If you can't seem to make a legit argument, give me a reason not to give me a legit argument. I'm not twisting any of your arguments, you're twisting mine, trying to make my arguments seem false and wrong by using the same old debunked burden of proof argument, and completely ignoring my link (by hypocritically made your own link). Your arguments are useless now." you literally say in the wikia "if they say no, they are guilty" in the second paragraph, how is that misrepresenting? everytime I hit you with something, you say I misrepresent it, with nothing else to say, and in this paragraphs,in fact, you say I make your arguments seem false and wrong when it is you who is actually doing it, you cant bat away real proof by saying I "misrepresent" your wikia, (which is not a source of evidence since YOU made it), finally, you call my arguments useless, which is not true, and poor conduct in your part. "You are completely missing the point, as I mentioned before, the burden of proof argument you're desperately trying to push has been debunked. If you can't seem to use something else, give up. You can't just basically repeat yourself, and not prove anything wrong." Unlike you, I have been hitting with new things, you cant say I'm debunked when you haven't debunked me with anything, and if you cant do anything else than saying a misrepresent your evidence, give up. finally, you have shown no facts, no witnesses, no evidence, nothing, you have shown me nothing but pages and videos you made, and if you cant show me any of that, than you can consider the roast game debunked.