Abortion

Thank you Kelisitaan (Pro) for bringing an important subject to the debating floor. The freedom to “choose” is a function of the tyranny of governance. In some places throughout the world women can't “choose” the type of clothing they wish to wear, in addition to sex slavery, and other forms of tyranny. I'm assuming, after reviewing Pro's profile, Pro studied in the US (“Brandeis University”), who is an “Atheist” and therefore, I could assume this debate is based on abortion issues raised in the US. Pro made reference to “rights,” where the US foundation of governance is based on embracing and protecting the individual's “unalienable Rights” (“Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”) from the crimes of others and from the crimes of government. Since Pro is an atheist and college educated, we could also assume Pro understands the scientific method. And on that note, according to the physical constructal law (http://www.tandfonline.com...) a human entity at conception has “unalienable Rights,” summarized in the following article:http://www.westernfreepress.com...Over the last hundred years it is true the ruling-class in DC slowly became unmoored from the US Constitution resulting in unequal justice of one's “unalienable Rights” based on social class, one's wealth, or physical state (the very young, or the very old), etc. Relative to the very young, before birth, or the very old, the medical industry evolved since the 1700's where the masterminds in government gave the medical industry the green light (“accepted practice”) to kill humans for various reasons which includes: genocide (http://www.lifenews.com...), a mother's survival risk during birth, rape, a form of birth control, assisted suicide, etc.What brings into question is the morality factor concerning the tyranny of government to enslave a segment of society to support the convenience of others to do what they want with their “body.” That is, in a civil society Liberty (freedom), for the most part, is a function of money. To quote Friedrich Hayek, “Money is one of the greatest instruments of freedom ever invented by man” (http://www.azquotes.com...). The more money a person has, the more freedom there is to do and buy things, live in nice neighborhoods, travel, etc. The increase of freedom has the tendency of improving the quality of “Life”, and reducing the amount of energy used during “pursuit” through purchase, control, and movement, money became a positive-feedback mechanism in the drive to achieve (or increase the perception of) “Happiness.” The tendency to flow towards freedom is the nature of the constructal law. Because money encourages freedom, the bio-program of our “unalienable Rights” provides reason to desire its accumulation. It is hard to deny the powerful effects of money on the perception of freedom; and even harder to deny its potential effects on morality and power, including social manipulation by the institution of government through taxation. In other words, taxing me to support abortion clinics is tyrannically taking a part of my freedom (money) away, effectively enslaving me to support the killing of humans, which I find immorally disgusting. What about my freedom, to “choose” what I want to do with my “body”? Not to be enslaved paying for someone else to “choose” what they want to do with their “body.” Abortion, the “accepted practice” by the tyranny of government in the US, enslaves the population to support an institution to kill humans. This is why I took the Con position against abortion. I simply don't care what a woman does to her “body,” but the tyranny from “accepted practice” decreed by the masterminds in DC, I'm forced to contribute to her desires.