There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

It may be true for some individuals, but not for everyone. There are those who have to break the laws into substance a living. So for example is it right for those who have no food to break into someone"s house, and take their resources so they can survive. This is the problem I see with the illegal immigrants coming in from our Southern borders of Mexico. They come in here looking for aid and help in order to have a better opportunities in the land of opportunities just because their government is too greed to stop hugging their entire nation"s wealth. So at the end, they dump the people and their nation"s people on the back of others? Is that ethically correct thing to do? Are those people not also criminals, even though it is not their fault? Also there are others for example during the 2008 financial crisis that are really well off and rich, but are just too greedy for their own good, so they want to break off from the system into make and become a little richer than they already are. Everybody in the world, no matter where they are or what time they live in from the ancient societies to today would and could see that what happened during the 2008 financial crisis was wrong. There is no debating that. Many people got hurt, and everything in the system needed to fix as it became broken, and the ones who caused are considered criminals of the lowest order. If someone has to break the laws ethically, then there is something wrong with their minds. Yes, we don"t understand their reasoning behind their thinking. Maybe they are too advance and intelligent for the common folks to understand. Maybe in the future their method of getting to the top will be understood, but for now society views them as criminals, and they broke the law. Society has no tolerance for rule/law breakers or criminals as they are not the norms of society, but going to college is. Yes, college is not the only way/method to success, as it is not an accurate measurement of one"s intelligence or ability, but in some society is the only way one will get respondent, and see as intelligent. For example in most Asian societies no matter what one"s live of success, will being, wealth, or richness one has, many people will view you in a different light if one does not have a college degree or a certain position that is viewed in a negative fashion. It does not matter that it does not matter to you or you are better off than these that does, education symbols intelligence, by having more intelligence, it symbols you are smarter than others, which means you will get more advanced job with the end result meaning that you will have a higher standard of living than others who does not have the same education, which may be ethically wrong in their method of thinking. But the Asians have been wired for centuries that way of thinking, so to them that is ethically correct way of thinking, only through that can one achieve success, happiness, and especially respect of their family, peers, and others in the world. Yes, there always will be conflict with ethics no matter what. Nobody or society will always agree with each other, it"s the fact that society grow up as new discoveries are made, and new knowledge are made on a daily basics. Values and norms change all the time as new ones are accepted and old ones thrown away. For example, the Greeks and Romans in their military, it was fine for the soldiers to wear skirts, and commit in homosexual behaviors. People today look down upon that as ethically all across different societies of the world.