In defence of Atheism, Prove me wrong

All right, I will get right down to it. First: You failed to read the entire article before responding. Your method of considering the debate before responding makes you a heckler, and you founded no response on my argument: Because my argument must be received as a whole before not after dissecting it. = so read this full argument before replying!! Second: I linked in our conversation the contents of my argument I had hoped you would first discuss them with me. You did not read it I presume, as you did not reply ~ and so while I waited for that, I posted this in the time of staleness as an interest point, which stood apart from our debate. It was not factually apart of our debate, it was a fun fact about my faith, so you can understand me. I tried to clarify that. but because you ignored our relationship status int he conversation section, I guess as a new member I misinterpreted how the respect between personalities is received here. Because you did not understand a few facts I will review, sneakily avoiding your detested word of choice.: The Considerate God: Is a beautiful concept you neglected to perceive. I understand this as being you had not read my debate, but immediately dissected it before even considering what i was even saying. If, God was a notion, God {by definition, being the full accumulation of knowledge and power of All eternity (I call that, the notionverse (and see it as I explained), but exists as what all religious people have faith in regardless of it's name.)] would be the most self-considerate form. As each idea exists in every manner of variation, then When you choose a more powerful greater "God" to be this deity, the slight variation of 100% equal proportions, but being self-considerate, Yells at it's opponent, "I am you! But I care enough about em to say I am better!" and a greater opponent would arise, and he would yell, "I am you! but I am better!" His opponent would have no defense, because he doesn't care about himself enough to stand against this self-endearing equal. and in all logic, he would say, You are greater. For even this greater God would say tot he lesser, Yet I worship a more Grand God of even greater more self considerate proportions!. As a Christian I believe in Greek Mythology. It is a Monotheist religion, and is the credible reason for the greek empires success. Chaos is this God of the Notionverse. He is Awe inspiring. Kronos, is the God of which you speak! and he is undone and belittled by Chaos himself, who is the credible creator of all the Titans. And so, this debate has been won in my favor by an empire of Philosophical genius's time and time again. But this was not my debate; it was but my teething! To be Outside of Time: such as a wild dream, or a notion, or anything that exists outside of Time. The full content of the "subject entity" is complete from beginning to end, without actually progressing: All progression has already been rounded off and accumulated - the fractal-essence of possibilities (every possible thing, is considered in every variable idea of that "Subject"). Outside of Time, is thus, unchanging, complete, what it is, without possible growth and development. !00% considerate of all potential variation. Because God of the Notionverse, exists outside Time, to create time is a trifling affair. Why suffer all the consequences of a real world, when you know all the outcomes. It would not be self-considerate to belittle one time, by pressing another can be better, or that there is another which is worse. God, who abstracted all perfection from the Multi-verse of conceivable ideas, Gave the one Real Time, to his One perfect Son, Jesus our Creator. The perfect ideal form of the Multiverse God. This is Notionism, and it stands firm as a great philosophy. but this was not my debate! If you read my articles by now which I had linked in our conversation board, -Math defines atheism as being a existence without free-will which still brought to attention, the existence of this God. - if you have not looked intot he geology of the planet to see for yourself the miraculous evidence and proof that the world had expanded from within itself: I encourage you to before you respond! And so. I stipulate apart from debate that you can attack me briefly after such a response: I do not believe in gravitational pull. =I believe that water as an entity clings to itself int he least amount of volume possible, and is wrapped about the earth holding us down. The energies cycling between earth and the universe, between More-ning and Even-ning, balancing the total capacity of energy on the planet, creates a vortex which the moon rests in. The moons effects on the tides is thus governed by the light it provides tot he tides, swelling the ocean with heat. I believe strongly, after close and obsessive evaluation, that the galaxy is a map of creation via this method of following creation whilst regarding modern sciences factual results. and Gravitational pull, is not observed in the Galaxy, as it is neither observed on Earth according to the answer to any alternative modern theory. The observations are aparant and obvious facts, butt he theory, and thus word definition of Gravity are false in my understanding. THE DEBATE: Because my religion brings me utmost satisfaction: Rejoicing in Gods laws of conduct - not promoting adultery, which provokes rape and abduction, and neglectful boyfriends and various other things - not promoting murder, or theft, or dishonoring your parents, who might be you one day, in the condition that to honor your parents doesn't mean to believe them or listen to them at all times, but to be truly considerate of their efforts, hardships and influences on your life and your in theirs. -to not blasphemy by using the lords name in vain, which is not to say wisdom is foolishness or foolishness is wisdom, that one would mislead someone into conflict or strife and guilt. This causes people to misunderstand and avoid faith when avoiding faith promotes adultery, leading to political injustice, and abusive relationships, and false religions which lead to greater confusion - believing in no other God, which would be less satisfying and in promotion of misconduct, for This God loves all conduct that leads to a greater more enjoyable end of ends. Because of this, I am feverish in debating my point that history and science and logic are in defense of my side of the argument. The greeks were monotheist: Chaos created all things without the help of another. all other deities created and established nothing, but may have been the natural components of creation for other things, as earth and water make mud, which is plant-life and creatures, which are not described in creation of mythologies. ~ This chaos is imperceivable as Christ said, I cannot be known by none but my Father, and Only my Father can be known by me. ~ Krishna is this Chaos also, divided into percievable aspects of his personality, who ahve no authority apart from him, but are acknowledged becasue his folowers know and respect that they cannot pray to the perfect form of God, but must look to the facts they do know, : Shiva: God can destroy all things: Genesh: God brings fortune and sends away misfortune to his followers. As Sanskrit says int he Words of Krishna himself, "You cannot pray to another God, for by praying to any other, You only pray to me." as he was speaking to his cherished and beloved servant, Arjuna, his chastiest warrior. Because no other theory is logical. I presume I win. As you can present nothing but to invoke doubt in me as your stated stand int he argument as having no knowledge or understanding beyond that of an adolescent. There is no room for doubt. But because you may still doubt, I cannot win this debate until I have filled you with the enrichment of faith, and a desire to seek a true delight in your faith. Without God, there is no such thing as right and wrong. They are subjective opinionated statements thus, that are of imaginary origins. How can one believe that is true? But an atheist cannot deny it non the less, that is the factual reality of atheism. Rape, may be abhorred now, but in centuries ago, so many people pillaged villages, was it truly wrong? The answer is yes via Religion, and No via atheism. For it brought delight to the majority, and since those who did not approve were soon dead or the MINORITY, their opinions are then voided via atheism. Testosterone causes Menopause. The failed development or function of ovaries. The Jews, strained the hormone rich blood out of the animals they ate, because, for unknown reasons it was deemed unholy to eat. Animal hormones cause mental and physical dis-functions as well. { off the record [*I presume this blood-sausage thing is the reason behind poor british dental*]} "Men-Oh - pause, don't dot hat it is bad for womans health" is a modern conspiracy hidden by immoral atheist scientists who think they are the cool kids in class for supporting all the big dudes, are more well suited for the quote " Men, oh, pause, she doesn't need to know that." Despite adultery leads to women having no homes, are homes a man doesn't help pay for, or children who do not respect then, even women promote this. When in reality, a lazy, unself-considerate man who is not fit and respectful, and productive, partakes in adultery even during marriage. Because marriage is not about sex, it is about loyal devotion and loving support. Only religion ever supports this. Those atheist claiming they do, are driven mostly by fear, and largely found all their morals on the well-being and security of a nation governed by a law given by the religion institution. Faith is a delight. Because you are not jealous at any time. You do not desire things that have negative effects on others. You do not desire the things God knows will have a negative effect on you. This is a perfect perspective of Reality: it is not limiting. Amen