Barack Obama would make a better president than Hillary Clinton

First of all I think they are both closet communists and belong running in Russia not the United States of America. But for the sake of debate here we go. First of all I will start out by point out that my opponent has obviously made her entire case by copy/pasting information from google sources. This all seemed a little to professional so I pasted it in the google search engine and there it popped up word for word articles. So here are the recourses she used as her own words. Argument 1. "In an interview, Obama stated that he has the capacity that Clinton lacks to unify the country. "I think it is fair to say that I believe I can bring the country together more effectively than she can," Obama said. "I will add, by the way, that is not entirely a problem of her making. Some of those battles in the '90s that she went through were the result of some pretty unfair attacks on the Clintons. But that history exists, and so, yes, I believe I can bring the country together in a way she cannot do. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't be running." Obama has said many of Clinton's views are wrong. He said that Clinton's foreign policy views risk continued international perceptions of U.S. arrogance. "Her argument is going to be that 'I'm the experienced Washington hand,' and my argument is going to be that we need to change the ways of Washington," he said. "That's going to be a good choice for the American people." -http://www.washingtonpost.com... -Copy/Pasted word for word This Clinton tactic was on display at the Texas debate when she was slamming Obama as lacking the experience to be commander-in-chief. "I've [represented] our country in more than 80 countries to negotiate ... opening borders for refugees during the war in Kosovo, to stand up for women's rights ... around the world," she said. "I've served on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and I have worked as one of the leaders in the Congress on behalf of Homeland Security." While this experience, if accurate, might qualify one as a senator or an ambassador, it is not exactly the job skills of a commander-in-chief. In the wake of the Bush calamity, the nation deserves a wise commander-in-chief steeped in world history, courageous and keen of judgment. While steering this lone superpower, this helmsman should be mindful of the limits of military force in the unstable age of international terror. - Copy/Pasted word for word http://www.newsday.com... This is not to decorate Obama as an model commander-in-chief, but rather to measure him against Clinton, who supported the war, and McCain, who should know better. In a desperate grasp for power, 71-year-old McCain has thrown himself on the mercy of the Bush White House. He now supports every jot and tittle of current Bush policy, including tax cuts and the war in Iraq. Voters wish not to prolong these crippling mistakes. Among Obama's other gifts, he seems blessed so far with opponents frightfully out of step with the Democratic process. My fourth point is that Obama is a better public speaker. I am not saying that Clinton isn't a good speaker because she is. But, we are debating who is better and that person is Obama. I have seen many of his speeches, heard many comments about his speeches and have only heard good things. He knows what he is talking about. Speaking skills are in important characteristic of a president because without good speaking skills you cannot communicate to your fellow Americans, you can't communicate with leaders of other countries, or communicate with anybody. - Copy/Pasted word for word http://www.newsday.com... Argument 2. No one asked if America was ready to see a black man in Major League Baseball....... etc etc - Copy/Pasted word for word http://blogs.jsonline.com... "My third point is that Barack Obama would be a better commander. America needs Obama's promise of fresh leadership and a new direction. I have a tremendous amount of admiration..........etc etc Copy/Paste word for word http://www.blackenterprise.com... "The value of past experience is diminished when dealing with economic, social, and environmental crises America has never faced before. Only Obama can credibly offer solutions predicated not on past political experience of dubious value, but on a desperately needed, forward-thinking agenda. Of the candidates of either party, only Obama--like John R Kennedy more than four decades ago--is qualified to deliver presidential leadership for a new generation of Americans hurtling faster than ever toward an increasingly complex future.....etc etc to the end of her argument. Copy/Paste word for word http://www.blackenterprise.com... So, out of all of those two lengthy arguments only a small portion is actually HER argument and since I am arguing dmarie15 I will adress her arguments Not the ones she pulled up on google. Argument 1. "Therefore, you can obviously see how much better Mr. Obama would be for the country." - No I don't see how Obama would be better for this country. Obama is a 45 years old he has only been involved with public politics for two years of his life. How does that qualify for any position? especially president of the United States the most power seat in the world? "he can unite the country more effectively" - How so? Obama was voted the most Liberal senator this year. I don't see how he can unite the country better at all. "he would be a better commander" - Opinion you have presented no authentic evidence to support such a conclusion. I find that a a man who has been a senator for two years could not possibly make a better commander than a woman who has been a senator for 20+ years. There is no on the job training as far as the president is concerned. "and he is a better public speaker" - This has nothing to do with "Obama would make a better president" Lincoln was noted to be the most boring speaker in the presidential history but he is also remembered as one of the best if not the best. "Therefore, I urge you to vote pro in this debate." - I urge you to not copy/paste arguments in the future it makes you look like you really don't have any idea what your arguing about. Argument 2 "My fourth point is that Obama is a better public speaker." - Is this the only true argument you have?...meaningless because Obama can talk the talk does not mean he can walk the walk. "If you watch some of his recent speeches you will see his well thought out ideas and how well he can communicate with the American people." - No I don't, I have watched some of his speeches and I hear a 35 minute speech about nothing. I look into the crowd and see 18 year olds girls jumping up and down with "I heart Obama" t-shirts on acting like it's a Hannah Montana concert. We are choosing a president here not the next American Idol people.