Resolved, Imabench should be banned for violating the TOS

1) My opponent is shifting words to create a strawman fallacy. If you look at the start of his section on this, he says, "If you allow exceptions to be made..." but ends with, "If we make huge exceptions to every rule..."We can see where he is twisting the argument into something that it is not. I never argued that huge exceptions should be made for every rule. I said that no set of rules was absolutely perfect and so sometimes, personal judgement needs to be used and the occasional exception allowed. If one finds oneself making too many exceptions, that is when you think "maybe the rules can be improved."2)a) Good things that Imabench has done? He's an active member in the Inner-Circle with Airmax and myself. He's recommended letting Freedo take over the blog so that it would get more views (probably a good idea). He has actively helped Airmax deal with trolls and aggressive threads by combating them with humor.Here's one particular quote, "Im trying to derail it [Hitchslap flame war thread] with humor but nobody seems to notice, deleting it is a good move in my opinion." Imabench has even made proposals for how to help DDO get more votes for debates (an issue that has been a pain to counter for almost a year now), a proposal that is actually very likely to be implemented.And all of this? Just in the last week. b) Pro has listed some negative things that he has done, but has not shown how they've "harmed" the site. Can he show that he's chased any distinguished members of the site? Can he show where he's trolled any debates started by senior members? Most of his "troll debates" are either, 1) Started by him (in which case, he is not trolling), or 2) Started by a new member that is showing an elevated level of ignorance with said debate.Many of his debates are like this one.http://www.debate.org...We can see that he lightly "trolled" it, but he presented complete and solid arguments and then just posted political satire pictures.c) Given how much Imabench helps with proposing new ideas for helping the site, and how he has not harmed DDO any more than a hair cut harms your head, there is no need for him to be rehabilitated, he is great just the way he is (I'm not hitting on him). Currently, he is just throwing out random sentences of extreme comments, not in an effort to actually harm any member, but in an attempt to portray himself differently than he really is for this debate.d) I've listed some, but not all, specific examples.e) My opponent claims that a moderator eliminated all those threads. However, moderators cannot eliminate threads, they can only close them (which they would still be visible). This is also highly illogical since DDO admins sometimes take sexual assault seriously (if pictures are not provided), as seen in this thread.http://www.debate.org...I myself was banned on the mere accusation of sexual assault. Yet we are to believe that accusations against Imabench will be ignored because he is "funny"? Imabench even agreed that this was the "Best Mod Ever."My opponent can point to violations, but no actual harm. I can point to actual benefits. However, none of this really matters, because none of this implies a duty or obligation.Thank you,