Call of Duty is the Best First Person Shooter.

The first point I would like to bring up is about sale's and revenue. Yes I did not state that were very key factors in this debate, but their are very good measures of how a game does. Certainly they dont not show if the game is the best FPS, but I am 100% certain that a game which generates such high qualities in sales and revenue must be competent to some degree. My second point I would like to make in this Debate, is that though valuable your individual opinion does not matter. Though you may not buy Cod, millions of others do and will continue to do so. Same with kill streaks though you may feel they are not innovative but we have to look at the facts, you didn't state any other game that has kill-streaks, which also includes battlefield. My third contention will address maps, and your other individual arguments, as for maps my simple response is with call of duty, you die, you re spawn in, within 5 secs your back into the firefight, in battlefield you die, watch your opponent who killed you for 5 sec, and spawn in on the other side of the map, where it takes 5 min to join the firefight, I spend more time trying to reach the actual objective than trying to actually kill people honestly it should be renamed walking field 3, but that is my own opinion, the main point is that since cod, has smoother game mechanics at 60 FPS frames per second, more party option with friends, Kill streaks, more weaponry, quick scoping and weapon camos it beats BF3. Another point I would like to address is your argument regarding playing with friends, yes I agree that people are busy but the majority of people who play call of duty dont share the same opinion of you, I have been in tons of games playing alone, and I am not even that good and like most people who work and come from a busy day, I enjoy just sitting down and having a good time, yes though there are people who care about stats, the majority of the cod community just enjoys having a good time, and yes though there are campers, and other such burdens, these will come with any game that you fill find no mater what. You also bring up a point about critics, and yes these are just other peoples opinions, but these people are educated in their profession, why do we listen to a doctors, a teacher, lawyers or a professionals opinion? it because there statements which usually come from knowledge and expertise in their skill, carry a lot more weight that you or I. That is why they should be considered very seriously in this debate. In regards to your last contention, where your quote my concluding statement, I would like to say that COD is a game that anyone can pick up and master easily because of its Arcade Style shooting, where as other games require a degree of patience and skill to even be competent at. You also bring up Mass Effect, where you can change the story line etc. However with the recent title of black ops 2 this also is applicable to the cod campaign. ( . http://www.gamesradar.com...). Also me and thousands of other gamer's have never bought the expansion packs, which means the game's price is 60$. Finally I would like to conclude this argument by stating that their was no response to my arguments on effort and campaign. I would also like to state to new arguments on Call of Duty's superiority as a FPS shooter Zombies and Special Operations. Along with multiplayer, many gamer's also have the option to battle together against hordes of zombies which features its own story line and has gained significant popularity ( . http://www.ign.com...) the same is with Spec Ops, mode with the modern warfare series, which pit you and a partner in a series of bonus mission with their own special objectives, and the option to survive endless waves against enemy forces using your own arsenal, support and perks. Pro League As far I am aware call of duty, is the only FPS shooter to have its own established professional, in the major league gaming circuit. This alone is another reason which show's the depth of the game.