Christianity debate.

Pro has still yet to provided an argument for why Christianity is true. Let's delve into this anyway. ". . .then how come we do not see random occurrences of objects popping up in our kitchen or our bedroom." My opponent misunderstands "quantum fluctuations." You wouldn't see these particles. They're virtual particles that pop into and out of existence. These aren't chairs and televisions popping into and out of your room. Also, spontaneous combustion does happen, so I'm confused where you're getting your information. Here are two examples via wikipedia "Haystacks, compost piles and unprocessed cotton may self-ignite because of heat produced by bacterial fermentation. Linseed oil in a partially confined space (such as a pile of oil-soaked rags left out in an uncovered container) can oxidize leading to a buildup of heat and thus ignition." There are even 200 cases of spontaneous human combustion. Although I don't really know why I'm addressing this or what it has to do with quantum fluctuations. To address questions: How does God exist and why does he exist 1. Pro lists qualities of God and says he, "exists outside the spacetime continuum." This is incomprehensible and no evidence exists to support the statement. 2. Why is Christianity right over other religions "I believe in my religion, as other religions believe in theirs. Me saying "Their religion is absolute garbage and it isn't true." is why we have war today. Do not take me out of context though as I do believe my religion is the true one, that doesn't give me the right to criticise others for them thinking their religion is true. As in the bible on so many accounts, people are worshiping other Gods because they have the free will to do so." Pro can't provide any evidence or reasons why Christianity ought to be believed over other religions. Even if we decide to assume one of those religions is correct we could only at best give Christianity a 1 in 500 chance of being correct, given the number of other religions with equal evidence. Technically, this debate could be over now, given Christianity's extremely low percentage chance of being true (what I promised to prove), but I will continue anyways. I have only two arguments to post showing Christianity as false: 1. Let's first establish the Bible is inerrant. Proverbs 30:5 Every word of God is flawless. Also, as Stanley Grenz, biblical scholar, said, "Because God cannot lie and because Scripture is inspired by God, the bible must be wholly true." So when the Bible says that there was a world wide flood it was meant literally. However, scientific evidence shows there was no worldwide flood. To quote talkorigins because I don't want to paraphrase: "How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers. [Johnsen et al, 1992,; Alley et al, 1993] A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10 ky) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction, and (n) other characters. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 10,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time. [Becker]" As you can clearly see here there are a lot of problems with believing the global flood actually happened, and a lot of evidence to the contrary. 2. My second argument is one from logic. Something can't exist, which has contradictory qualities. The most common example would be the circle square. While a square must have 4 sides a circle is required to not have any. Thus, such a thing as a circle square is impossible since it is impossible for the same shape to have both 4 sides and no sides simultaneously. Similarly, a God who is both all knowing and all powerful cannot exist. I'll explain. If the God knows what he's going to do in the future, but then he is able to change it he is still all powerful but not all knowing. If he knows what he is going to do in the future and is stuck having to do that action in the future then he is not all powerful. Conclusion: An all powerful all knowing God cannot exist. Since the Christian God is an all powerful all knowing God the Christian God cannot exist. Resolution NEGATED (or whatever they say) Also, to remind my opponent. You haven't provided any evidence that Christianity is correct. You cannot prove Christianity true or your argument true without providing evidence. 1. http://www.talkorigins.org... 2.http://www.stanleyjgrenz.com... 3. http://www.biblegateway.com...