Abortions has scientific benefits and should be legal.

"I think you have forgotten that the debate is on abortion, not stem cell research. The reasons you have provided is that the mother should have the choice to abort because she probably has a good reason and that we can save a bunch of people with stem cells. The mother doesn't have the right to take a life on a whim. This is a rights violation. You admit this by observing fetus' as life. Abortion isn't necessary to get the benefits of stem cell research. You were kind enough to point this out. We no longer have a reason to support abortion. "-Wingnut Ok first off, im going to point out that im saying abortions should be legal because of stem cell research and should be legal, so i have not in anyway contradicted myself. Clearly you didnt understand, that scientific benefits refers to stem cell research. "Abortion isn't necessary to get the benefits of stem cell research. You were kind enough to point this out. "-Wingnut I never said such thing, Abortion is necessary. I simpily showed that if somebody wanted to get an abortion, then we could simpily keep the embryo and the baby could ultimately still born. I believe this ends your side of the debate due to it solves ehtical problems which you obviously have. "I agree, I think that in medical emergencies, abortions are legitimate. I don't think a mother should be able to have an abortion for just any 'good' reason. I also don't think taking a life in the name of saving others is legitimate. I have proved these points above. "- Wingnut how do you decide the medical emergencies? How do you seperate who deserves it more? If abortion was legal and we could get stem cells like that* everyone could be saved, not everyone but obviously people that could use it. Now i know you will say i already admitted to a fetus being a baby, but in reality this is my personal opinion, but here is the truth. . http://medical.merriam-webster.com... Websters declares a fetus is unborn baby, yet to take a breath or become a human being. When abortions are being done they doing nothing but ejecting parts of their body. One might ask why do this but ive allready given some examples why this is more than appropriate. Last but not least. "So, if the baby is going to be born prematurely, we should kill it and save it from a 'terrible' life? Should we kill all handicapped people then because they don't have a 'full' life? This is a terrible mentality. To think that kids with birth defects don't deserve to live is pretty terrible. " Wingnut Honestly you took this in a different way. this is what i said: "Now after reading those do you think that a baby really stands a chance? Its abortions like this that need to be done. Do YOU think it would more cruel for a baby to come out 5 months early or with a cocaine addiction or possibly brain damage that wont allow them to participate in society? I am in no way denying life of a fetus but its cases like this that strethgen stem cell research as benefitial thing to the world. "- ME Would you be happy if you couldnt function in society, because you had down syndrome? It is perfectly fine to have down syndrome, i am in no way saying that they have less of a reason to live. but also what about a coke addicted baby? Ultimatly it would surely die. The chemicals that already been in its body?