Sin does not exist because there is no proven god that exists

I respect your opinion where you say that "It"s an abomination as far as translations go. " While I don"t agree with your opinion, I will be courteous and stick to the traditional King James Version (KJV). You say that, Essentially, Text is "the worst form of communication correspondence, Declaration, Advertisement, Broadcast, Propaganda, Publication etc etc etc pe-ri-od [SIC]. " Let me ask this: If text-based documents are as bad as you claim, Then why is every important and fundamental thing recorded? We have police reports that are recorded, History textbooks that teach children about their ancestors and the world, The US Constitution and Bill of Rights, The Declaration of Independence, The list could go on for miles. Our entire being can be found in texts-figuratively and literally. I"m not here to debate the importance of text-based documents, Though. I"m here to debate how sin exists and how God exists within the Christian faith. "Even then I still would not believe in the travesty according to the worthless fictionalized bible, As this egocentric so-called god is nothing but a superior ego god complex in which your bible is entirely about and nothing else. " It"s after reading this statement that it really hit me that your debates seem to revolve around your emotions. I"ve noticed countless times where you state how "bad" the bible and Christianity and sin and anything remotely close to those topics are, But you"ve given no real examples except for a proposition you stole from Shabir Ally, The writer of that article titled "101 Contradictions in the Bible. " (You can read it here: http://www. Answering-christianity. Com/101_bible_contradictions. Htm) and a few quotes from some people with their opinions (interesting opinions, But still opinions). My point for explaining the timelines of the Old Testament and the New Testament were for context reasons. It absolutely matters, And I explained why it matters later in my Round 1 debate. I"d be happy to further explain how it is important to understand the context around the Old Testament and New Testament regarding sin and rules and all that though in a later round. What is some evidence you have that can help your claim that the Bible is a "simpleton storybook fable that is NOT [SIC] evidence of anything except to prove it"s own failures and demise"? How does the Bible prove it"s failures and demise? What are some scriptures you could provide me with? **I would like to mention that I tried to watch the YouTube videos you included, However I could not get them to play. Can you include the links in your next post so that I can look at the videos? Thank you! "OK so you freely admit that your god changed. " I never said my god changed. God has many reasons for the things he does, And as a Christian, I put my faith in his decisions. Rules were stricter during the Old Testament times because people"s sins had not yet been paid for by the blood of Jesus (hence another reason context and establishing the timeline between the Old Testament and New Testament was important). God has rules and helps to guides his followers to obey those rules. "If this god is a god, This supposed god could have started out with peace, Harmony, Care, Kindness, Love etc etc etc AND KEPT IT [SIC]. Nah. This supposed god of YOURS [SIC] is more concerned with evil, Anger, Wrath, Vengeance, Rage, Fury, Jealousy etc etc etc". God did start with peace and harmony and care and kindness and love; It"s evident from the very first chapter of the Bible as God created the universe and Adam and Eve (Genesis 1:1-27). It"s evident as God spoke to Adam and Eve in Genesis 1:28, "And God blessed them, And God said unto them, Be fruitful, And multiply, And replenish the earth, And subdue it". It was only after Adam and Eve disobeyed God"s initial commandments and ate from the Tree of Knowledge that God had no choice but to banish them from the Garden of Eden and the veil between man and God was closed. Alongside the second part of your comment, Can you please provide some bible verses explaining what you mean when you say that "this supposed god of YOURS [SIC] is more concerned with evil, Anger, Wrath, Vengeance, Rage fury, Jealousy etc etc etc"? I would love to better understand your side from an evidentiary standpoint. "Passed down those baggage emotions down to man so in turn man could learn to hate with at least 1 billion dead on the battlefields alone all in the supposed good name of YOUR [SIC] god. " Can you provide your evidence for this? "Sin is not needed. Sin is not a requirement. Sin is not a necessity. Only to YOUR [SIC] god it is in which you cannot even prove exists. " Like I stated in my Round 1 debate, Everyone believes in a concept of sin-even if it"s just the minimal belief of sin being synonymous with rules. You believe murdering is wrong-that"s the same as saying murdering is a sin, Because it"s morally wrong to most people. That"s the secular concept of sin-sin is a wrongdoing. Let"s move onto your questionnaire. The very first thing I noticed is that all of your questions are based from the Old Testament. Death is not the penalty for committing those sins anymore, As discussed in the New Testament after the death of Jesus Christ. If you were to give me a revised questionnaire based on the new guidelines that are set by Jesus" lifetime on Earth, I"d certainly be willing to take another look at it. Onto your verses regarding the prophets from the Old Testament: - In Ezekiel 20, Ezekiel is speaking with other leaders and they are speaking with the Lord about what will happen to Israel, Who was at the time a rebellious country. So yes, That"s a great example of a prophet anointed by God using his gift to speak with the Lord. - Ezekiel 14 is also dealing with the prophet Ezekiel and the rebellious Israel. Here, The Lord says this, "When any of the Israelites or any foreigner residing in Israel separate themselves from me and set up idols in their hearts and put a wicked stumbling block before their faces and then go to a prophet to inquire of me, I the Lord will answer them myself. I will set my face against them and make them an example and a byword. I will remove them from my people. Then you will know that I am the Lord. " (Ezekiel 14:7-8) This is why God says if a prophet answers the inquiries he shall be destroyed-because the Lord said he will answer the person directly, So the prophet would be a false prophet. - 1 Kings 22 speaks of a conversation between Jehoshaphat (later known as Ahab), Michaiah, And the King of Israel. In this case, The King and Jehoshaphat sought after Michaiah"s wisdom (Michaiah was a prophet) about whether or not they should go to war at Ramoth Gilead and if they would be victorious. It"s there that Michaiah shares the Lord"s plan: "Michaiah continued: "Therefore hear the word of the Lord: I saw the Lord sitting on his throne with all the multitudes of heaven standing around him on his right and on his left. And the Lord said, "Who will entice Ahab into attacking Ramoth Gilead and going to his death there? " " Finally, A spirit came forward, Stood before the Lord and said, "I will entice him. . . I will go out and be a deceiving spirit in the mouths of all his prophets, " he said. "You will succeed in enticing him, " said the Lord. "" (1 Kings 22:19-22). Therefore, Based on looking into the context of these stories, Your claim that God was lying to his prophets is false. "Not if people were not told what sin was. How could 99/100ths of the world know what sin was considering the fact that your god only decided to babble in one small itty bitty place on earth AND [SIC] bring destruction to it with according to the storybook bible genocide after genocide after genocide? " Everyone who heard about Jesus Christ and God knew about sin. It"s taught in the Bible. Could you explain and show your statistics on 99/100ths of the world not knowing what sin was and be more specific in your claim, I"m having trouble understanding exactly what you"re trying to say. As for the idea that God stayed in one small area of Earth is false, In fact Jesus explicitly tells his disciples in Mark 16:15 to "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation. " Also, Could you please give some bible verses to explain the genocides you claim happened in the bible. I"m aware of a few religious crusades that were ordained by God, But I can"t think of an explicit genocide happening. What do you mean by "Yeah like 4 of them required death"? Do you mean that they called for death or that the consequence of them were explicitly death. "The 10 commandments are incomplete with 4 commandments stroking god"s ego and leaving a commandment to honor and protect children out! " Can you give some more explanation for this, I"m not quite entirely understanding the point you"re trying to make. I look forward to seeing your next rebuttal, Thank you for making this debate both thought-provoking and challenging.