God as explained by all religions does not exist.

A.The Big Bang Theory has evidence to support it, but the problem lies in the questions that cannot be answered. It's the same idea with religious deities; no doubt there will be some logical questions that cannot be answered, however, just like these logical questions don't disprove The Big Bang Theory, they also don't disprove gods existence.Questions raised against a theory does not disprove it (agreed). A theory stands as long as at least a single evidence against it is found. Questions on a theory only means the theory is incomplete. There are many questions related to big bang that have are unanswered,it means its incomplete. However there is not a single evidence or proof that goes against it. Much like evolution, a single logical evidence against it is enough to prove it wrong. (kindly dont get into the game of semantics here)In a theory,when there are contradictory proofs,they are changed or discarded. However in over thousands of years,the religions have been describing god in a contradictory manner and yet havent agreed to change the description,the initial description still remains.a} The exists a theory/religion named L with statements x,y,zb} x and z are contradictoryc1.} x and z are discarded or amended c2} x and y are not discarded or amendedd1} L still exists but now as L' (L' similar to L) d2} L doesnot (cannot) exist in any wayB.Thank you for understanding. I am not exactly debating against theism but theism as explained by religion. Discussion about the presence of a secular god should not contain religion as a factor as religion is the creation of man. It is true that there are thousands of religions in the world and there is no viable way each of them can be disproved separately. However it is also true that all religions have described their god as being almighty, (omnipotent,omnipresent etc etc) or have described the presence of spiritual/supernatural entities. At this point I would request opponent to show a religion who describe almighty that is not fallible scientifically and logically. (Although that should be difficult to find as religions are based on faith and not logic)A2.What is the chance of Yahweh not existing? What about the Christian Trinity? Vishnu? Zeus? Allah? Isis? Each probability might be close to one.But multiply them together and the chance of none of them existing drops way down and makes it much more probable.All religions state that their gods are true gods and the rest will be punished. And the people following the true religion will be protected by god. Right? How is it then that people get killed irrespective of the religion they belong to? How is it that people from no particular religion seem to more blessed?As for religions who accept the coexistence of other religions, are not really a religion as they accept that their god is true but also accept that other gods from other religions also exist. This means they have doubt over their own beliefs. Etheir their god exists or the other religion's god exist. The mid way religions donot make sense.B2. The explanation for these questions MAYBE/MAYNOTbe explained by a god. But definitely not the ones as shown by religions. Gods of religions are intolerant of people who donot believe in him. As said before, that would lead to only people belonging to the true religion to be prosperous and the rest sad and unhappy which is not what we see on earth (unless of course all religions are true and each's god kill people of the other religions)