Mitt Romney's name is more swell Barack Obama's

Counter Arguments1. AnagramsPro opens by criticising my use of other websites to find examples of anagrams. This is illegitimate criticism. There's no rule limiting me to the sources Pro provides and I'm more than allowed to use the entirety of the Internet provided to find Obama anagrams, or even make up my own if I see fit.Pro criticises my methods because I didn't search the site I used for Romney anagrams. This too is illegitimate. I am in no way obligated to find Pro's arguments for him. That's an absurd complaint. I used Pro's own source and argued against that with my own. That's exactly what I'm supposed to do. Had I done otherwise, Pro would complain that I am straw-manning or something along those lines. This is a weak trap and I'm not falling for it. I in no way made a gamble of assuming the voters don't check the sources. To the contrary I made it a point to tell them to see for themselves. Pro is grasping at straws to divert attention from his original deceit on to my imaginary deceit. Now that that's dealt with, on to the argument.I picked two anagrams on the site Pro provided at random to give the voters a proper sample of what's available on that site for Romney. Pro managed to find two anagrams with funny sounding words, but that's all they are -- funny words. "Nerve Orgy Moron" and "O, Mr. Ogre, nor envy" are still nonsensical. This argument is defeated.Pro then goes on to list user submitted anagrams, most of which are nonsensical anyway and of the sensical ones, only "Mr. Tit money" is any good. Compare the lone Mr. Tit money to the super team of the Penis Dreamboat, Obama bin Shark-sauce, the Modest Ape-Brain etc. and it's clear who wins on anagrams. It's not even a contest.2. MeaningsPro then criticises me for referring to Romney as a "winding river" instead of "one who comes from winding river". This is more illegitimate criticism. When Pro originally brought it up he said Romney meant "winding river" and I quote: "Romney" means winding river. Is Pro admitting to lying previously, or is he lying now? Well it seems he's lying now as the source HE provided in round two turned up the following meaning for the name "Romney":"In English, the name Romney means- winding river." [1]Clearly, Romney means river. There is no denying this and I highly recommend the voters check the link out to verify that Pro has indeed lied about what his source says to support his argument. This lie, on top of the lie that Obama's name means nothing (which may have been just laziness, but now I have my doubts) brings the reliability of Pro's entire argument into question, but I don't have enough characters to investigate further so all I can do is invite the voters to look into the sourcing themselves.3. PunsPro concedes this point, so there's little else to say, however he blatantly straw-mans me by saying I argued anagrams are a lower form of humor than puns. This is completely wrong as anyone who cares to scroll up can see. I said unfunny anagrams are lower than funny puns. Another lie, or more laziness?Pro then contends that this debate isn't over the humor potential of their names. Funny how he had no problem arguing for the humor potential of Romney's name up until now, but once he concedes the point he becomes so dismissive of humor as a factor, at least to the extent that it should be the only factor -- which I never argued to be the case making this yet another straw-man. Once again, this is a desperation tactic used to water down the impact of his loss.4. IIBarack's name is derived from "Baraka" [2] just as Mitt is from Milton, so the criticism still applies. What's the point to this argument exactly?Dropped Arguments1. WillardPro completely dropped my counter argument outlined in point 3 of round 2 (Willard) addressing Mitt's disapproval of his own name and my accusation of Pro's argument being a non-sequitur. Given this it must be concluded that Pro concedes that Mitt disproves of his own name and that he was, in fact, arguing a non-sequitur. ConclusionWell, this is a pretty clear decision. Pro's best arguments here amounted to illegitimate criticism used to divert attention from his flimsy and hollow arguments, straw-men arguments, dropping arguments he can't deal with and outright lies when nothing else was available. All that leaves is Pro's concession of Obama's superior pun potential, which given that it is a concession makes the decision on the matter a foregone conclusion. There's many more such things I could bring to light and debunk, but my the small character limit of this debate keeps me from doing so. No matter, what I've provided is already more than enough.When all this is taken into consideration, every point of contention argued here; be it pun/anagram potential, class, meaning, or even their own views on their names, Obama's name is more swell.A vote for Con is a vote for the Penis Dreamboat!Thank you.1. http://www.meaning-of-names.com...2. http://goo.gl...