Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito are innocent of the murder of Meredith Kercher

Since con forfeited last round, I’ll stick with my original plan of continuing the rebuttal of con’s R1 arguments. Again, I’ll paraphrase con’s claims for brevity sake. Raffaele Sollecito (RS) Rebuttal:1. RS's DNA on MK's bra-clasp in her locked bedroomThe bra clasp was left at the crime scene for 45+ days before being collected. During that time, items moved around the room and numerous investigators came and went (according to the police’s own video)[1][5]. Whether there was ever any DNA left there by RS is in doubt. The forensic experts reviewing the evidence for the appeals trial have indicated that the DNA found on the clasp has a high probability of being left there due to cross-contamination and improper evidence handling[4].2. Footprint on a bathmat left by RSThe experts disagreed at trial on whether this was RS or RG’s foot[1]. I suppose, if truly RS’s footprint [track] that it would indicate he was guilty of cleanup but not necessarily of murder. Without RS or RG’s DNA there or even a true footprint (there is only an outline of a foot [track] in blood) I would say this evidence isn’t particularly compelling.3. RS's own father blew their alibi that they were together in RS's flat Please provide a direct cite for this claim.4. RS claims Meredith could have accidentally pricked herself at his flat.I agree this was a boneheaded move on RS’s part. His lawyer should have told him not to speculate. But that’s hardly convincing evidence that RS killed her.5. Computer records show no one was at RS's computer during the murder despite his claims that he was using it.That’s not exactly true. Depending on when you assume the murder took place -- Prosecution says midnight, Defense says 9:30[5]. He was using the computer at 9:30pm as evidenced in the Massei Report[1]. Also, RG was seen on CCTV arriving at 8:45pm in the same jacket he was arrested in and that verified other parts of RS’s story[2][5].6. The extensive hard drug use of Sollecito as told on by Amanda Knox.If relevant, could explain his changing stories – drugs do affect memory JBoth Rebuttal:1. Break-in where glass was *on top* of apparently disturbed clothes.I don’t think this point is critical in determining guilt or innocence. Filomena’s testimony is that there was glass on top of apparently disturbed clothes. This is not, however, evidenced in any crime scene photo. 2. Both suggested each other might have committed the crime and RS TO THIS DATE does not agree AK stayed in his flat all the night in question.I don’t dispute this – they have in their respective diaries said the other “might have” done it. But that doesn’t prove guilt anymore than them saying Santa Claus might have done it. Neither one has ever, on their own, declared their guilt.Back to RS Rebuttal #6. RS couldn’t remember most anything the night of Nov 1st but that still doesn’t prove guilt.Remaining Rebuttals:I did not rebut con’s remaining arguments, since even if true would not advance con’s position. For example, RS being punished for watching animal porn at the University fails to connect with his guilt in this murder as do the other skipped contentions.My Argument:The evidence that places AK and/or RS at the crime scene (specifically Meredith's bedroom) is on very shaky ground (I’m being generous here). No one disputes that this is where Meredith was killed and yet not shred of reliable evidences shows either AK or RS were in that room. The only one shown by multiple sources of evidence is RG. RG is the only person with documented injuries after the murder, the only one to flee and the only one with a criminal history.I look forward to con’s reply. Sources:[1] http://www.beforeyoutakethatpill.com...[2] http://www.injusticeinperugia.org...[3] http://www.bioforensics.com...[4] http://knoxdnareport.wordpress.com...[5] http://www.injusticeinperugia.org...