There is at Least One Problem with the Notion of a Catholic (Christian) God

I'm going to make an assumption about your point of morality without an afterlife. You're going to say that there's no point, right? Well, wolves and other social species have their own form of morality and I doubt you'd say that they are going to heaven. Morality is a way to get along with each other, and to promote the well being of the tribe. That sort of objection is about why we should be moral (and the answer is because 1, it is in human nature to care for other humans, and 2, because it is beneficial to you and others that we have rules.)I understand that it is my burden to show why Christianity is immoral, and I provided clear examples of how it is morally wrong.I'm not sure what you are asking for me to give a proof of. That Christianity is immoral? My examples do that.Q1: Did the early Israelites interact with the Greeks to the point where they had to make a rebuttal to them? And if the point is just to say that God created everything using order, then why create a false story? If this book is inspired by God, why fill it with falsehoods, especially when he doesn't plan on making a new one to correct them? In fact, why leave it up to vague stories, and not just tell us the message?Q2: Apparently the scientific innacuracies in a book inspired by God can be explained away by the fact that the people he was talking to didn't care.Q3: I don't think I was implying that they had no understanding of science at all. Their scientific inaccuracies and a lack of scientific method or any sort of method to finding out the world (other than pray to something that probably isn't real) shows that they're ignorant to most of science.Q4: Why wrap it up in a story that isn't true? What is necessary about the flood myth that can't be said directly? Don't disobey god. Boom, I just saved everybody an entire page. And if the parables are so necessary, why does God sometime do away with them and just tells people the rules? Why doesn't he stick to a single format?Honestly, if I am an all knowing and all powerful god, I don't write something so extremely important to the fate of humans in a confusing manner that people have to explain what it is even trying to say. Actually, I wouldn't put it into a book at all, I'd just give them that knowledge if they absolutely have to have it.I never said that the Bible supports denominations, but it's confusing and vague messages make it almost impossible that schisms would occur. There were denominations before Protestantism. Orthodoxy, for instance?Is the way to find out whether or not something is from God him just telling us? Nope? Course not. Apparently the way to tell if somebody is from God is because they are miracle workers? Okay? How does that determine the validity of Protestanism? Are we still talking about Protestantism? Let's assume you are correct. God didn't want to break the natural order (even though he literally has absolutely no problems doing that ever. The flood, the plagues, the parting of the red sea, the flaming tornado or something, the burning bush talking, Jesus, etc). Why doesn't God say so? Why is he so vague that reasonable people would find issue with what he is saying? What about, "Hey, let's stop here for now," or, "Hey, you aren't going to win that fight with your weapons so let's chill?" Instead we have, "I, your almighty god, can't do this right now because they're chariots are fitted with iron."(*2) No, Exodus 21: 2-6 talks of slavery. https://www.biblegateway.com...It isn't an infinite crime because I only have a select number of years to do it. If I had forever, then you may have a point, but I only have 70 or so years (and that's being optimistic) to do this noncrime. And I'm not choosing to go to hell. God is choosing to not show himself to me. Oh my god, so God can literally do anything he wants to do to us on Earth because of Heaven? What? JESUS CHRIST. Okay, maybe if somebody were enslaved and God said, "You really shouldn't do that guys," you'd have a point that Heaven makes up for it. But it doesn't. IT LITERALLY TELLS PEOPLE TO ENSLAVE THE HEATHENS AROUND YOU. It is telling others to put people in horrific, dehumanizing situations even though God is perfectly capable of putting a stop to it. If I see somebody getting mugged, do nothing, and then buy them an ice cream later I didn't make up for not helping them. But this scenario isn't even suffecient to explain how evil your god is. Your god is a man with an everything proof shield, aware of every situation and pain on earth, with ample ability to stop it, and not only that, but he specifically tells people to do some of these horrible things. Oh, that's cute. If something is contradictory, it isn't a problem. It's just not literal. Would you tell a child a story meant to tell them a lesson with a glaring contradiction? Who would listen? You just admitted a problem with the Catholic Christian god. Yeah, one interpretation that you pulled out the "Backpedalling Closet". You know, I really don't like getting this upset and I really wanted to avoid a debate about proving whether or not God exists, but that one paragraphe really upset me. Jesus man, this religion has divorced you from any morality. Any pain or evil is okay because maybe, just god damned maybe God might let them go to Heaven. That is, if they believe in the correct invisible sky apparation made up from the mind of a confused sheep herder. I noticed you didn't address the rape of virgin prisoners of war or the execution of the male ones. Yeah, I'd really like an explanation there. What dispicable thing will you pull out to excuse this atrocity? So for next round, prove that your god exists, prove that Christianity is at all moral, prove that the actions of the Catholic Church are moral (INCLUDING THE PROTECTION OF CHILD RAPISTS), and while you are doing those things, maybe fix world hunger and bring about world peace. I mean, they're all just as likely to happen.