Charlie Sheen is more socially undesirable than Lindsey Lohan.

I thank Darkkermit for his insight. Let's analyze it... shall we? (I apologize for the Bieber article. It seems that Charlie Sheen continues on "winning" by requiring people to register for site content now... perhaps it's because he needs the extra cash to fund his smoking habit.) Kids... they are an impressionable bunch. They look up to role models, follow pop culture, and now have more access to media in every conceivable variety than ever before in all human history. Lindsey Lohan has caused her fair share of harm too... (from shoddy b-movies to her fair share of substance abuse problems, as my opponent points out). The magnitude of the harm that Lohan causes though, no matter how bad that harm may be -is still less than that of Charlie Sheen. My opponent inquires as to what actions cause harm? In reply... those of Charlie Sheen. Plain and simple. Here's why: Neither of us would have any way to prove wether Lindsey Lohan or Charlie Sheen either one caused kids to use drugs, or influenced them to make destructive decisions of any variety (even if that destructive decision is one's political preference at the ballot box). Even if we had access to, say, the arrest records of every kid in America (or adult for that matter), who is going to admit that they took up a habit of cocaine addiction because they wanted tiger blood too? Obviously... no one. Both Sheen and Lohan are reprehensible figures, the question then becomes what each figure does with themselves once they clean up their act -or just snap their fingers and cure their brains in Sheen's case. Remember, he's a b****** rock star from mars... automatically "winning." When Lohan gets into trouble though, she gets arrested. She goes to rehab. She faces the consequences of her actions. Sheen? Not so much... He not only hasn't been arrested, prosecuted, etc. for his epic "run" that made "Sinatra, Flynn, Jagger, Richards all of 'em just look like droopy-eyed armless children," he is proud of it! He isn't ashamed. He doesn't feel even the slightest scintilla of guilt. He didn't even have the courtesy to apologize! Lohan apologized. Lohan was arrested. Lohan went to rehab. Charlie Sheen is suing his former employer (http://www.cbsnews.com...) and he is now on a comedy tour (http://www.okmagazine.com...), all the while insisting that he is "winning." Is this winning? "Winning," by Sheen's standard, is cheating the law, disregarding social and societal codes of decency, and flaunting a comprehensive decorum of debauchery before the world as the media watches. He has faced no consequence. He claims he doesn't need rehab. He shows no remorse. The problem with that that I have is simple: the idea that it fosters. Charlie Sheen, by example teaches kids (and adults too) that they can get away with things, that they can live lives without consequences -if only they have enough money or a crappy show on network TV. The message that Sheen's mere existence (outside of prison or rehab) is what is harmful to society. What does it say about the integrity of our system of law and order that Sheen wasn't arrested? Is he above the law? I will point out that if Sheen hadn't acted out as he did, regardless of that system, the message wouldn't have been sent. The message is the problem. The societal implications are the result. Celebrities politics, religious preferences (don't even get me started on Tom Cruse), etc. all falter in comparison to the message Sheen sends. Kids turn on their TVs and see a fully grown man out "winning," and think to themselves... "me too!" That is my greatest fear, behind adults doing the same...