Atheism is a Lie

Very interesting, elaborate, well put and fare minded response. However, I still think that I may be able to sway you. "If a man opens the bible and starts to read it. He may read and read but find nothing. His eyes will not be opened, his ears will not be unblocked, the flame of his mouth and heart will not fill with wisdom. Why is this? This is not because the bible is true or false, nor would that effect the reader. What inhibited the reader was that he was not reading the context of the scripture. Instead of reading the scripture from the perspective the narrator had presented, they were skeptical and judgemental. Not being judgmental or skeptical, does not imply blindly believing, it implies the script is simply perceived as presented. By not rejecting the message one can actually decipher it. And choose to accept it afterwards should they find it true, OR only accept the true aspects of it." What I am asserting here, is two things: first, Modesty, in that before attacking the scripture for it's reprised renown, you should simply read it as such: "God IS, without doubt, and he created the world. And he s perfect, so he is without blame. The world becomes adulterous and indulgent and bigoted as they are without proper upbringing, and so social injustice ensues and the conflicts of man snowball rather quickly. God however, refuses to destroy the planet because it would not be a Good (flawless) decision to make. As we Go on we read that, 'women began to have relationships with oppressors, and tyrants, slave owners and likely beastial perverts, pedophiles, incest couples' etc... and so God viewed this snow balling effect as cause to say, 'it is a Good (flawless) decision to make to destroy Babel.' For the social inequality was not just to man's dismay. Eventually, we learn that God's prophets while dealing with infidels become dismayed, and break his laws to ease their burdens, by relaxing their judgement on the congregation. And the snowballing, that leads to infidelity continues unchecked afterwards until utter failure. Then, after wars, and testimony of the peoples specific behaviours which lead to war, social inequality and utter desolation of wisdom, the land and the people we become acquainted with a great prophet, Jesus. Now, where as the other prophets did not remark over vain things, or redundant things, regarding God's nature, but instead simply recounted the factual events that were imminent and looming due to man's poor conduct as well as recounting eh plight of those suffering from their own sin and that of other's, Jesus did something different. The Lord of Heaven, forced us to review the entire content of the Bible prior to his birth, and evaluate the character of God more personally. He did what the prophets before him did, 'Told us that there is no forgiveness for denial of the word of God (ie. adultery, lying to one's self, IDOLIZING womanizers or womanizing, rejecting eh words of the prophets), but he did something more, He told us that The God of the Kingdom of Heaven has a biased preference towards the people he communicates with based on their conduct (not because this is what scripture taught, but because by actually accepting the guidance of the scripture people were immersed in wisdom, love and a communion with God)." What is significant about that is, that if you do not simply rea the scripture as it is presented you have actually refused to search for the Reasoning and Significance of God's judgement and preferences. The methods of God's behaviour, the fruits of his actions, and the logic of his patience. Secondly, By choosing to come to your conclusions after not during your evaluation of the evidence, not always having reached an evolving conclusion, THEN - AH HA, see here - You only ever believe in the Facts, and you have no belief structure outside of True Knowledge. ^ This is called Modesty, and living by this practice is called Humble. You are not delusional, or blind in any faith if you only put faith and only believe in TRUTH, which can be evaluated scientifically with wisdom. Wisdom is the Mechanic of a Modest mind, which prevents any fallacy or false conclusion from taking root, For no fallacy is every accepted, it is logged only as notable or reference-able data and is never used or presented in a pretending or arrogant manner. What say you, 'The Witness of God, came to you today, and without being able to present a miracle testified to the glory of God.' You, either atheist or theist, cannot judge this man's experiences, or hold his lack of credibility against him, YOU CAN ONLY evaluate the content of his testimony. And whether or not, in his testimony he was overbearing, or perhaps hysterically errant, You have no right to reject one IOTA of wisdom nor accept one iota of fallacy. But in the end, Either way, you cannot judge God on this man's behaviour - God, is the judge of all your actions, and he watches all your conduct, and You are required to modestly firsthand, and honestly second hand be capable of testifying to God the Uprightness of your self-reflection - God accepts no excuses. He simply states facts: whether or not you were guilty; For to deny the Word of God, and say you were wise or justified to refute God, was always an act of blasphemous arrogance. I have always feared, not being able to testify to y own actions. But this is not why I believe in God, nor is it why I absolutely revere him and Love him. It is simply why I revere him... which lead to loving him... which in turn is why I am modest. I choose at this time to withhold my next assertion: That lacking Faith in the Word of God, is in effect lacking faith in God; And If God exist then scriptures and human interaction would have and is taking place, something with many testimonies, and easy explanation as to how and why there are not more; and also that Atheism, being a lack in the word of God, is... well overall a lie, BUT is a genuine lack of faith (in God).