God loves you

“Again, John 3:16........For God so loved the world” Again, I already defeated this in R3, with no defense offered from pro to counter it. “Note the perfection of the word ‘loved’ past tense, not loves present tense. Past love is no assurance of present love.” It was pro that insisted on the words being absolute perfection, defeating his sole piece of evidence. “ignoring or casting aside Bible passages whcih clearly state God loves my opponent” See above. Also pro only offered a single passage, while trying to throw out many more. “My opponent is rejecting God's love so of course my opponent will take passages of the Bible out of context” Ad Hominem attack, as still (from R4) “No errors have been pointed to with my interpretation of the King James bible.” “My opponent has no reliable source for saying God does not love him other than his own feelings of being unloved.” See R1, being born with brown hair in “the Christian family ideal” of Neo Nazism caused me to be “made to eat dog food, never taught to read and write… forced to hit myself, forced to burn myself.” I have brought this up twice; pro has not disagreed with this torture as “the Christian family ideal.” “if you say there is no God who created all things” Another “direct violation of the rules to this debate,” as “no agnostic and no atheistic arguments are permitted.” “Why should a man complain about the punishment for his sins? God does not willingly afflict or grieve people.” I have already proven this argument to be counter to pro’s claim, as the sin he is God creating people who are born “not white enough.” “God is not willing that any shoudl perish” Another clear attempt to throw out books from the bible, as was proven earlier God has directly killed many people. Were we to throw out the bible as pro repeatedly requested, we would be left with only the unchallenged evidence from my life that God does not love me. Voters: However you vote on this debate, please note whether or not you believe pro violated Revelation 22:18 (adding words into the bible) and/or Revelation 22:19 (taking words away from the bible). The first would mean inflicted with the biblical plagues either in this life or eternally in the next (it would suck to be the only leper in heaven), the second would be a guarantee of going to hell (these are God’s punishments, not mine). I personally suggest the following on voting... Conduct (con): Pro violated his own rules multiple times, was caught falsifying the bible, was caught using numerous fallacies, attempted to cheat the character limit by posting extra arguments in the comment section. S&G (con): Even after being reminded of spell check, pro continued in his attempt to build a tower of babble. (I admit to having misspelled Pro’s name, so I can envision a valid vote leaving this a tie) Arguments (con): No contest. Pro dropped every single point made by con, refused to define God’s recorded actions as love, self defeated his single argument, being left with little more than his racist assertions of God punishing people for the unforgivable crime of being born not white enough (pro’s mind is already very questionable, as he actually believes he pulled more than one bible passage in this debate). … A vote against me could be justified in one of two ways. Either interpreting the resolution to be about you (the voter) instead of me, in which case if you are about 2000 years old the single passage containing “loved” may apply to you. Or if you indeed define love as seen in my hypothetical “…a past history of torturing those who love him and murdering their family members. He informs you of his love for your daughter and that if she does not love him back by a certain time, he’s going to lock her in a torture pit for as long as he possibly can.” Sources (con): No contest. In the entire bible pro could not find a passage that says God “loves” us, whereas con was well sourced to the point of jumping through hoops on a Moving The Goalpost fallacy.