Should it be okay to treat people with ugly faces like crap

INTRODUCTION In this round, Ellen has tried to explain why she believes that we should treat people with ugly faces like crap. Let us see if her arguments hold up under scrutiny. ARGUMENTS It's not a troll post. I am being completely honest with my opinion. If my opponent says she is being honest with her opinion, then I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt. Ugly people are often looked over for jobs, but if… My opponent’s first argument is that we should not treat ugly people like crap if we must engage them in the workplace. So now she has apparently changed her resolution from “We should treat ugly people like crap” to “We should treat ugly people like crap unless not doing so is advantageous to us”. Since this is a different point, it does not support the resolution laid out in round one, and she has offered no reason for it. However, you'll find in [sic] most places will take the better looking person… My opponent’s second argument is a classic fallacy first identified by the philosopher David Hume. My opponent simply states that ugly people are not liked as much as pretty people. Well, okay, that may be true in many circumstances, but that does not mean that it should be true. You cannot jump from what is the case to what ought to be the case. My opponent’s resolution was that we should treat ugly people like crap, but she has only pointed out that ugly people are treated like crap sometimes. And I don't know about beauty being subjective… My opponent’s third argument mistakes inter-subjectivity (subjective tastes that are shared) with objectivity. Just because several people have the same taste it does not make that taste objective. She also said that majority usually rules. Perhaps majority is a good way to decide what laws should be implemented, who becomes president etc. but it does tell us what is true or false. This is another well-known fallacy known as the “the democratic fallacy” or the “appeal to popularity”. Most people used to believe that the earth was flat, but did that make it true. Most ugly people are unhappy and bitter and take their problems out on other people… The statements my opponent made in this argument are not objective. They are only from her own personal experience. She has no scientific evidence that ugly people are unhappy and take their problems out on other people. Just because she has never met an ugly person who is nice does not mean that they do not exist. She has offered no evidence that this is the case. The world would be a beautiful place if we could treat ugly people like crap… My opponent makes it clear to us that she thinks that we should treat people with ugly faces like crap but not people with ugly bodies. She does not explain why she feels this way, and this does not support her resolution either. CONCLUSION In the first round, I gave two arguments to negate the resolution. Ellen’s response to the first one (about subjectivity) did not refute it and she argued beside the point. She ignored my second argument and instead only offered personal experience and observations about how ugly people are treated. These are both irrelevant. Ellen has no case.