Anyone with a beard should be banned from DDO

I saw Susie sitting in a shoe shine shop. Where she sits she shines, and where she shines she sits. Pro's Arguments: With the burden of proof being on pro, he has to be showing how his arguments are enough warrant to win the debate. He's not doing that, so you're voting him down. Money Gain: Extend my response that in the status quo that we already sell razors and things to shave a beard with, so saying that Pro will sell theses things to earn money doesn't really give him an unique offensive argument. It's not like razors wouldn't be sold if we negated instead of affirmed. He doesn't give any kind of response to this. Don't let him give one in the last round as that would be unfair to me (as if this debate isn't already unfair enough). But then, extend my response that negating brings more money in than affirming due to hair styling kits are infinitely more expensive than just plain old razors are, meaning that negating brings in more money and improves this area than affirming does. His response is that he just wants to make the best razors known to man, but a) no one would ever do this. It would be really expensive to do, and then when everyone has used the razor and all the beards are gone, no one will need the razor anymore. There wouldn't be a market for the razor. But b) I'm saying the same thing about beard styling kits. I want to make the best beard styling kits out there. They'll sell infinitiely better, as well. If I'm just styling my beard and not getting rid of it entirely, then I'll always need a styling kit, meaning that they'll keep selling. This means I'll be making infinitely more money than Pro. Ease of Use: Extend my argument that not shaving the beard will always be infinitely easier to do than to shave the beard. This turns his ease of shaving when if ease is what we're looking for, then I'm always going to be easier. He drops this argument entirely. Don't let him respond to it in the last round. Fundraising: Extend my response that I have the ability to fundraise too. He just says that his is better due to it helping people learn things, but mine is able to do that as well. I help people learn about different ways to maintain their bada** beards, so I link into learning as well. There's no way that we differ here. Suffering: Extend my argument that by denying people who are able to grow beards the right to, he's enabling more suffering within the world, meaning that his attempts to minimize it fail. We should view beards as a gift rather than as something to hate and oppress. He says that beards killed his family, so I'll never be able to understand the suffering he's been through. But while that may be true (I'm not sure it is with him not providing any way to verify it), I know for sure that beards are a gift when beards saved my entire town from annihilation. Hundreds of families now live due to beards. This shows that they stop more suffering than they may bring about, meaning they're a net good for humanity to have. Resolutional Text: He's being unfair here. All of his arguments have to do with shaving beards and then he's trying to use the wording of the resolution being about getting banned from DDO against me when I make my arguments about shaving beards. Don't vote me down for this, I'm just responding to his arguments with my own refutations. But moreover, there's no reason to believe that hair should fall off in a stable environment. Not only that, but this presumes that hair from our beards should fall off to begin with, and that assumes that the resolution is true to begin with and we're still debating the resolution. Finishing The Round: I've responded and made offensive turns to all of his arguments. He has no way to gain offense in this round while all the arguments he makes either don't generate anyone offense or work in my favor. Not only that, but I've kept up with all of his rules, so I deserve to win the debate.