All Else Being the Same, a Moral Position in War is Untenable

Woah.. not so fast MacDaddy!We will use air transports to paradrop into NationA's capital.Unless you have aerial refueling available, I'm calling BS here.Each grid was defined as 500 miles across; whereas my capital is 4 grid squares away or 2,000 miles (a long way for a plane). And if you compare our initial deployments - you'll see that I deployed my Air Forces (all forces at DEFCON 1 & 2) and gave them go ahead orders to engage forward airfields. PRO never deployed his airforce and made the strategic blunder of withdrawing his forces to hide inside his cities - leaving his airfields (including runways and parked aircraft) exposed to attack. And as far as the nuclear armageddon thing goes - due to perfect ISR - I reserve the ability to make an instantaneous decision to order a retaliatory strike the second a ICBM launches. Nation B must now decide if nuclear warfare is still a tactic they wish to employ.Nation B will not take NationA's MAD threat seriously. It's not credibleYour ISR says it is. Perfect ISR implies 100% accuracy. Meaning that PRO must perceive my threat as genuine.they cannot shoot down transports due to "human shields."There's quite a few things wrong with this whole human shield theory.First. There's more than one way to bring down a hijacked plane. EA-18 Growlers are going to fry your navigation systems with GPS scramblers or shine blinding lasers into the cockpit to force a landing. My Airforce is deployed.Second, Nation B's combat effectiveness and unit cohesion across the services is going to be in the dumps while every one is stuck babysitting untrained civilians in a time of war. For instance, I find it laughable to believe a fighter-pilot would be able to pull off a 9G turn while Bubba is in the backseat pissing himself. This whole dynamic is made even worse due to PRO's nation wide "buddy system" and the added the responsibility of safeguarding crazy inmates.Third. Nation B has totally underestimated the "all else equal" clause in this debate - which implies PRO has the same democratic laws & systems we do. Whereas PRO has suspended his constitution, used civilians for human shields, occupied his own cities with military force, threatened nuclear war, freed criminals, strapped ordinary people to nuclear bombs, and given dozens of illegal orders in violation of UCMJ, Posse Comitatus, and the Insurrection Act without any military, political, legal, MORAL or rational JUSTIFICATIONS (key word) whatsoever. Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both (https://www.law.cornell.edu...). - Posse Comitatus.You see. in a democratic system, where a government rules by the consensus of the people (Constitution or Act of Congress) PRO's leadership must in someway JUSTIFY his insane military actions or face immediate impeachment or forced removal from office.Not even Joseph Stalin could pull off the kind of tyrannical stunts PRO has done - at least he had a Nazi invasion to convince people of immoral neccisity, but PRO in this scenario is not an absolute ruler and has nothing to persuade people with. He has no moral advantage, no political interests, zero military necessity -CON didn't threaten nuclear war- no economic gains, no religious fervor, and ZERO RATIONALITY for instigating violence. He will never build consensus with his people! Why would any one follow him?RATIONAL PEOPLE WILL NOT FOLLOW PRO. A moral argument could have saved him, but his leadership doesn't have it. And the second person required to turn the nuclear keys - WILL NOT DO IT.As subversion, rioting, and revolt takeplace throughout the streets of Nation B, their tyrannical military leadership can do nothing to win this war quickly due to the Capital Defiance Act which will relocate my capital upon contact with the enemy - a political-military tactic made possible by a moral argument and advantage that united our country.And now we make our moveOur unified Congress will pass the following law:THE NATION B LIBERATION ACT (aka Emancipation Proclamation II)"Whereas the tyrannical government of Nation B has threaten its people with nuclear war, economic ruin, and enslavement, it shall be the policy of Nation A to grant full citizenship to any Nation B civilian upon immediate entry into Nation A's national borders."Our mandatory conscription laws employ all citizens into military service, so there's also a hidden rules advantage to this as well.This war is now about liberation. Nation B people who desire freedom will come to our side.We have used non-lethal means through-out and have taken care to avoid civilian casualties, our side is believable and we offer an immediate ceasefire. Nation B's govt is completely bankrupt. This war has been won.