The problem of evil is a false argument

This is pros entire opening statement The following problems exists in this argument: 1. The argument assumes that God's existence is dependent on his actions which is false. God made everything, therefore everything is subject to his rules and order. Job knew God is just and wrestled with his character, but not once was his existence questioned. 2. It does not follow that god's existence shows he is omnipotent, omniscient, and perfect. We as Christians get that from his Word. 3. Definitions - God's concept of good and evil are based on the Torah and some of these definitions simply do not work in the way we think of them, so we should proceed with caution. 4. God's will - Just because God has the desire to eliminate all evil, doesn't imply that he should eliminate it in the way that we humans want him to. After all, it is God's will and plan to 1 day rid the world of evil. 5. Evil exists but according to the book of Job, he overcame the power of evil through faith in God, proving the ineffectiveness of evil, thus God essentially did "eliminate" evil and brought back Job's blessings tenfold. In conclusion, God is still omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect Rebuttal Note that nowhere in his opening statement does he say that Christianity is what we are arguing. He only uses a reference to the book of job. So this argument is assumed to include everything not just the christian faith. My opponent also failed to state what god he is arguing and only provided his belief on one god. So it is assumed that the statement should be applied to all gods. Only once I pointed out the fallacy of the blanket statement has pro established the rule that this debate is solely in Christianity. Since he neither stated this in the opening round no the acceptance round his parameter is void and he must follow the parameter of the debate (Which he set himself). 1) All evidence that pro has provided is circumstantial and is based in belief not fact. 2) Pro has failed to provide evidence pertaining to the debate as a whole and has only provided circumstantial evidence based on his faith while simply rejecting the fact and beliefs of other faiths. I will provide definitions of evil 1."morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked: evil deeds; an evil life." 2."harmful; injurious" 3."characterized or accompanied by misfortune or suffering; unfortunate; disastrous: to be fallen on evil days." 4."due to actual or imputed bad conduct or character: an evil reputation." Note that the only common theme in every definition is morality and morals themselves are a philosophical issue not just a religious issue. Evil is not solely a christian theme and cannot be applied as such. http://dictionary.reference.com... I will also provide definitions of philosophy 1."the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct." 2."any of the three branches, namely natural philosophy, moral philosophy, and metaphysical philosophy, that are accepted as composing this study." 3."a particular system of thought based on such study or investigation: the philosophy of Spinoza." 4."the critical study of the basic principles and concepts of a particular branch of knowledge, especially with a view to improving or reconstituting them: the philosophy of science." 5."a system of principles for guidance in practical affairs." (Perhaps the best and most broad definition) Philosophy itself is not a religious construct as neither is the term evil. To claim that it is is not only false but is cherry picking a very small part out of a very big picture. http://dictionary.reference.com... Conclusion Pro continues to use circumstantial evidence and has yet to prove that any argument of the problem of evil is false.