THBT prefects should be elected rather than appointed.

I am bored, And I came upon this debate. I thought it would be an ad. But it turned out it wasn't. Welcome to DDO, Chaosfield, To a dying debate community almost at the end of it's natural life. XDDDDDDD In here, You will find toxic a*****e who personal assaults religion. (not Thoht) You will find fools going over rap battle while most of us can't understand. You will also encounter people who forfeit their rounds for random reason. Of course, There is also people who are rational and goes to every debate prepared. (Thoht, I mean you) In this debate I am going to try to counter my opponent's 2 points while putting in some points of my own. First of all, Let's talk about perfects. In Canada, US and China, Where I had received all my education, I have yet to come upon any school/organization that have perfects. In my understanding, Perfects would be the class leader. The one who is voted in, The best student in the class and the teacher's pet. Of course, Teacher tends to view the best students in the class as the most reliable and would always do their homework. (Winnie. . . . . . Damn it) First of all, I am going to try countering your point. My Opponent pointed out two points: put a cap and regulate the amount of perfects that can be elected in a specific class or school and secondly, Make sure everyone in the class has to vote for someone. I have a question about that. Both of my opponent's policy serve as a solution to this problem, Neglecting the required explanation on why the problems would be solved by these 2 solutions. Then, He/she gave 2 substantive: Biasness and Sabotage First of all, When we are talking about Bias, Of course my opponent have a well-established point as results have shown that even adults can't escape from the Gender Bias and also Racism. However, My argument is, When appointed by teachers or higher authorities, Biasness continues to happen. Teacher may especially like a student and appoint he/she as the class perfect. However, Other students wouldn't favor this, Especially due to competitiveness between kids and teens. For example, It is common practice in China to regard the class leader, In this case, Perfects as teacher's pets and these leaders/perfects are often trolled upon or inflicted harm upon. That is a deep and substantial problem. The point my opponent failed to disprove and did not mention is that: As long as a person is a part of a society, There is always bias. Sabotage: A common practice, Yet sometimes bad. Mostly, Students don't hold grudges against each other. A fatal flaw is there in your argument. That is, Pupil A is a good role model, Then how can he provoke others? That is not sabotage. The sabotage my opponent should have talk about is the bribing. That is sabotage, Trying to earn votes from others. Yet, It is common practice among the current American politic. My opponent fails again to address this issue properly, Indicating upon the extreme cases while neglecting common practices of true sabotage. Finally, Upon the issue of my opponent's research. I object and ignore this survey as everyone should, Due to the fact that my opponent relies on his own evidence instead of trusting large institute's surveys as they cover much more population, And therefore gets better results. Onto my points: Class leaders/prefects should be elected instead of being appointed due to 2 advantages: 1. A civil society like ours today, Should start to train kids on the importance of democracy and by allowing them to vote, Give them a good habit and develop them for future identification in the American political and voting system. Since US is a democracy system, The school should adopt its ideology and practice as well. 2. Election gave people their own free will. Just like the current US situation. People who voted in trump can't just take back their vote. When that kind of situation happens in school, It help kids to understand that while the freedom of choice is yours, There is always consequences behind that choice.