The government should subsidize prostitution

It is not about what I believe or what Pro imagines me to believe. It is about prostitution and its reality. The studies that I have provided so far unmistakably prove that, it is a failed social experiment. There has not even been a shred of evidence from Pro supporting his arguments. I cannot think how one can take them seriously as it lacks credibility in its entirety. I did not mention modelling. I talked about acting. I did not say that not joining a union proves a job as illegitimate. I talked about the fact that, how the various benefits provided by those unions did not entice prostitutes to join them in Germany. After Geert Hofstede's study on Cultural legacy, Sex was understood well to be the need for continuing one's race for survival and not as an act of pleasure. The science of Homeopathy also does not say that sex is an act of pleasure. Throughout the world Sex has been instituted through relationships and only in advanced primates like humans it is viewed as an act of pleasure, quite recently. Medicine states clearly that sex prevails between the age of 15-40 years in human life. Thus it is not as basic as food, air and water are. All these points, and many more, point towards "sex with companionship" model. Hookups at bar and other modes are extravaganza of cults that advocates "sex for pleasure" model. It is nothing but a business trick to earn money and fool people. It has never yielded anything good for anybody in the known history. Pro's claim that Netherlands has lesser number of sexual assaults is supported by no evidence and it might be because of a lot of other reasons like good policing, good moral education etc. The fact is fragile and it bears no influence whatsoever. Cigarette smoking is not banned completely. It is legalized with restrictions and of course, with warnings. Yet it is the single most important cause of most death in US. It is quite easy for anyone to discern the complications of law. A law can twisted, turned and molded into whatever its creators want it to. Something legalized is subjected to amendments, additions, removals. Law can be extrapolated into a fearful compulsion. I can't guarantee that it will but, no one can guarantee that it won't. Law takes its own course and , if you really want to understand how it won't help the cause, please understand how law works in certain developing countries like India. Prostitution is not a job that people choose. Various studies in this respect have shown time and again that people in it want to go out and live another life. It requires no special skills. No talent. It is but exploitation and disrespect of the natural and scientific law of "sex for procreation". It additionally leads to Sexually Transmitted Diseases, AIDS, Cervical Cancers and a deluge of other problems. In summary, sex was not meant to be performed for pleasure only. It is the most intensive expression of companionship and should be performed with a defined purpose of continuing once survival. This process is so normal and was so well understood in the past that, the current institution of marriage that is prevalent now is a result of some serious thinking in this regard. The taboo on prostitution is also a result of this thought process and that has to be understood. If one wants to have sex, a relationship is the way to do it. That way it is safe and it has so many other benefits like stronger companionship, more vitality, better and predictable offspring and thus better life. I have already pointed out that if selling of reproductive organs was legalized then, trafficking or selling of one's kidney, heart or for that matter any body organs presume legitimacy and we would run into a chaos regulating all these businesses. Given a choice of one benefit (sexual pleasure) and a horde of problems against one regulation (relationship) and long-term benefits, a rational choice would be the latter. This is not only about an individual and his/her need for sex.