Existence of a god

Clarification:The logic I use that there is a lack of evidence for any deity is that, I have not run into anyone with said evidence. If no one is able to produce evidence of a deity, it can be concluded that there is a lack of evidence for said deity at this time. I personally, have not run into any compelling evidence for a deity, and I know of no one who has. I admit, there is the possibility that there exists evidence that we are yet to be aware of, but it doesn't make any sense to base a belief based on evidence that might or might not exist.I suppose I should have been more clear on what I meant by "lack of evidence", but by this I mean that we do not know of any evidence, not necessarily that there is for sure no evidence. If you have evidence for a god, you can present it, which I see you have presented something, which I will address below in the second bolded title from this one and show how it's not evidence of a god. RE: why do you believe a "loved one" loves you?Well, there is usually evidence that someone loves you. Love is a very subjective topic. People show love in many different ways. One evidence that they love you, is if you feel loved when with them. This may not be perfect evidence, but it is something. Now, another evidence is to ask them how they personally would show love to another person, and then compare what they say to what they actually do to you. If those things match up, you can conclude they love you. In addition, there are other evidences of finding out if someone loves you that may be more reliable, but it's not necessarily something everyone can do. For example, you can measure their brain activity when they think about you. Specific activity in specific parts of the brain would indicate that they feel love for you. So, there are scientific ways to measure someone's love for another person, just I imagine most people don't go through it. They trust the other evidences, as shown through that person's actions.Now, I suppose these evidences beg the question: well if feelings or experiences are appropriate for determining if someone loves you, then shouldn't feeling and experiences also be appropriate for determining whether a god exists? I suppose it is valid for you personally, but for it to be valid for other people to accept, it has to be something that can be tested for themselves and they get the same results as you. I've done much testing of times when someone feels that a god exists, such as sing hymns, read the holy scriptures, etc, but I did not get the same results they got. Thus, this would be subjective evidence. For loved ones, it's also mostly subjective evidence that we have, which is not perfect evidence. We could have a another complete debate on whether subjective evidence is valid, so I think we should leave it at this for now, since that also is a major topic that is sort of getting off-track. The cosmological argument:This argument begs the question: If the universe can't come from nothing, how come this god can? And if the God can, then why not the universe? You see, you have to accept that something always existed or came from nothing, otherwise you wouldn't ever have a universe. Either this god came from nothing, the universe did, or perhaps something else that caused the universe to come into existence was always in existence and had no cause. There's no evidence I know of that suggests any of these things. Though, I suppose one could argue that the Big Bang might be evidence the universe came from nothing, but I won't make that argument, as I don't have the burden of proof in this debate since I am not taking a position. I just thought I'd mention it as a possibility. Now, one could say that in our universe it is impossible for something to come from nothing, that does seem to be the case. However, who is to say whether or not other universes exist, in which laws work differently and in these universes, it makes perfect sense for something to come from nothing? Then what could happen is one of these universes is the real cause of our universe. Now, I am not saying this is what happened, I am just offering a very possible explanation for the universe's existence that would not go against the cosmological argument. It doesn't have to be a god that caused our universe. The cosmological argument is not direct evidence for a god, but rather it's one of the many conclusions one could arrive to through it. Unless there is supporting evidence a god exists, or evidence that disproves all other possible hypotheses, this argument is weak since there are many conclusions one can make from the cosmological argument.