Fallout games vs. Call of Duty games

We all love the game play, we only get bored of the guns,perks, and maps." We only get bored. How true is that with COD, that you even admit it. With Fallout, you have an entire variety of items to use and explore. That way, you don't beat the game in an hour unlike COD, where the goals are simple. The more time the game is given to develop, the more the creators get to be creative and actually improve the game instead of adding maybe one weapon or map that changes the game. The changes from Fallout 3 to New Vegas included new characters, weapons, etc." 1. This is what my opponent says however we I have stated you will get bored of fallout 3 as well, My opponent wants you to believe that it will last longer. This is not the case as a person who would play this game 1 to 3 days in a row more than 10 hours would have done everything possible to do. As well she wants you to believe that the leveling up doesn't have a ending its limitless however this isn't the case, level cap is 30 unless you have a broken steel expansion. My opponent also wants to justify the add-on's of both games however these are entire different genre and cannot be compare this has been my point for the entire debate and the only similarity it has is the guns my opponent has not offered any others rather the differences at which I have said cannot be compared. "One thing about COD also bugging me is the strange, Crawler or Gas zombies. It is not even possible that humans could have mutated into those "zombies". Just like the Hell hounds' creation. Takeo Masaki even said "That could not ever have been human!" 2. Oh this is funny, my opponent is complaining how the crawlers that were introduced in black ops "Zombies" which is a little add on game they put into call of duty for amusement at first and became popular, She complains how its not realistically human. May i as so what? So what? It was not meant to be real, and was added for some value at which people had a new challenge to face in Nazi zombies. Seeing how this is, I would like to add that Fallout is far from reality itself with death claws and mutated people that live forever and their bodies decay but they live name called ghouls a realistic possibility maybe but at this time it is not. However the crawler zombie is was not human who is not to say it mutated into something of the sort? As well as the hell hounds? obviously dogs they were turned into zombies and were set on fire, again who cares it was meant for a challenge to the players nothing more. This is a side game added on to call of duty for fun something to mess around with nothing in it is realistic and wasn't meant to be neither was fallout as laser technology that makes guns with lasers hasn't happened might not ever happen. It is nothing more than SciFi, and clearly is a moot point. 3. Again my opponent has done nothing to look over the similarities in the games and wants you to vote for her side on an unfair base set of how to different genre's are and this is unacceptable you cannot compare FPS to RPG seeing how they are both made for different game plays so the similarities must be looked at rather than just difference of both games. We must find a ground to compare I offered that ground however she wishes you to look over this and try to compare to totally different things that were not meant for they same type of game play. Halo vs call of duty Comparable fallout vs oblivion comparable this debate is like trying to compare Halo vs oblivion which isn't really possible because they have no similarities.