War With Iran

AggressivenessThe overthrow of the government which I am speaking of is the coup d'etat carried out by the American foreign intelligence group CIA and a British espionage group. I have already explained this event in an earlier round, so if you've forgotten you can direct your attention to Round 2. Thank you.I am not denying that the hatred is there. In fact, I know it is there and I argue that it is perfectly justified. But from what we have observed in the past, Iran is not going to attack Israel. It would be a foolhardy attempt that would be detrimental to their cause.Nuclear Weapons1) First off is the issue with waste. I'll point out that we ourselves have a total waste amount of 58% of the energy which we produce. [1] No matter how you want to spin it, that is a lot of wasted energy. And your argument that they could not possibly have the ability to deal with the issues of nuclear power because of their inability to manage their traditional power is nonsensical. The technology required to sustain those plants is far different from the technology required to sustain traditional power supplies.2) By "allies," I assume you mean Israel. The group which is threatening to attack Israel with missiles are the Palestinians. The story with them is much longer and I assume that you already know it. Hezbollah is mainly concerned with keeping Palestine and other nearby Muslim lands in the control of the Palestinians. Thus, they are willing to attack the lands which are in close proximity to their target. That I could find, there have been no recent attacks by Hezbollah on Israeli cities with missiles. There are several Israeli-run websites and sites that are sympathetic to Israel which claim that there have indeed been attacks by Hezbollah, but I could find no less biased source to confirm that. Most of the missiles come from Lebanese militant groups. [2]I'm afraid you are missing my point. UN inspectors are being allowed to test for radioactive material however they please. Why on earth would you want to sweep the whole desert with a Geiger counter? Unless people are truly that paranoid about this issue, that sounds fairly conspiratorial to me. The missiles (if they were to exist) would be housed in a military base, and if there WAS a sign of radioactivity, then it could be tracked to wherever the weapons are placed.Long RangeI did cede the point, but you again fail to adequately address my counterclaim.Since you make the claim that Israel has not attacked Iranian civilians, I'll direct your attention to the assassination of Iranian scientists. [3] This was carried out with the assistance of a terror group. So no, it is not a nonfactor. Israel is just as hostile to Iran as Iran is to them.War Without InvasionSince you are become visibly distressed with the invasion issue, I'll just point out to the voters and readers that PRO still is making the same argument that he began with. Beyond that, I drop the issue because it is bothering my opponent. In addition, I will not harp on the fact that PRO used a Wikipedia source.To conclude finally, my opponent has countered most of my arguments well but still cannot cope with the counter-examples which I provided. Iran is not a danger to the land of Israel for the reasons which I have already stated. It also is no threat to the national security of the United States. Iran supports groups with the same general mentality as them, and so does Israel (and the West for that matter). It would be easier if we could just stop sticking our noses where we don't belong and allow them to peacefully (or fairly peacefully) end their struggles with each other. It is a problem which has existed for many years and is not getting any better with American "assistance."Thank you and remember to vote CON for the end of American imperialism, interventionism, and policing the world.1- http://www.physorg.com...2- http://www.nytimes.com...3- http://www.huffingtonpost.com...