Severus Snape is a more anti-death eater character than Harry Potter

Thank you Famer, for your arguments.In R2, I had challenged Pro, that he has only presented evidence about Snape being anti-death eater. This was not sufficient to meet the resolution which says Snape is MORE anti-death eater that Harry. In R3, Pro blatantly claimed that he had presented the evidence for Snape being MORE anti-death eater. However his claim was based on a non-sequitur, and I called him out on it.In the final round, Pro claims that I misunderstood his arguments. What he 'really' meant was...“If we follow the definition that I have just placed forth, I have, in round 2, attempted to prove that Severus Snape is a MORE anti-death eater character than Harry.”This is the important word that my opponent has missed. From my arguments supplied I have “attempted” to prove that Snape is more anti-death eater than Harry, not that my arguments have proved that Snape is more anti-death eater.I have no idea what he is trying to convey here. Going through his arguments, readers of the debate will notice that he has not presented any positive arguments to support his claim that Snape is MORE anti-death eater that Harry. That means he has never ATTEMPTED to prove that Snape is MORE anti-death eater than Harry.===Rebuttals===Here are my opponent’s arguments in a nutshell: Snape risked his life: But others (including Harry) risked their life as well. So who risked their life more? Let voters decide. Snape helped Harry: But others also helped Harry in his 'tireless journey' (my opponent's words). So helped him more? Let voters decide. Readers of this debate will make their decisions based on arguments that we present. My opponent has not presented any arguments as to why Snape's contribution is MORE than that of Harry. The question before voters is - has Pro presented sufficient arguments to prove Snape is MORE anti-death eater than Harry. And the emphatic answer is a NO.===Counter Rebuttals===On other hand, I presented five good reasons why Harry is MORE anti-death eater than Snape. Pro has directly conceded one of them and tacitly accpted some of the others.Against dark arts from beginning: Harry was against dark arts from beginning. As a child, Snape was a supporter of Dark arts. This makes Harry better than Snape.My opponent has highlighted Snape's remorse. Remorse may make Snape great. But the unanswerable question for my opponent is, how can remorse make Snape greater than Harry his role as anti-death eater - when Harry has never been seduced by the dark arts in first place!To show the extent of Snape's love towards dark arts, I pointed out that Snape lost Lily due to his love for dark arts. Pro has failed to grasp the argument correctly. Snape lost Lily in school when Lily ended their friendship. Lily ended the friendship with Snape when he refused to give up dark arts at school. Lily told him [1] I've made excuses for you for years. None of my friends can understand why I even talk to you. You and your precious little Death Eater friends ... You've chosen your way, I've chosen mine." The forgiving nature: Another reason I presented was that Harry is more forgiving than Snape. My opponent has tacitly conceded this. However he attempts to cover up by makng a wild and ridiculous charge that actually Harry is responsible for Sirius's death. There is no way that such a conclusion can be drawn by any of the readers of the book.Little child, big deeds: My opponent conceded.The sacrifice: Harry sacrificed his life - and walked towards death with open arms. My opponent is under the wrong impression that:"I was under the impression that Harry did not actually die, but allowed Voldemort to destroy the bit of his soul that remains in Harry’s body. "I will suggest that my opponent read chapter 33 and chapter 34 of the Harry Potter and Deathly Hallows again. When Harry faces, Voldemort, he is convinced that he is about to die. There is an intresting conversation between Harry and Dumbledore in Harry Potter and Deathly Hallows [2]"But... But I should have died - I didn't defend myself! I meant to let him kill me!". "And that," said Dumbledore, "I think, made all the difference."My opponent makes a new argument that Snape also sacrificed his life. This is a new argument in the last round, so I see no need to respond and readers are requested to ignore it.Voldemort inside him: Voldemort was part of Harry's body and Harry's mind. Inspite of that Harry is never attracted by dark arts. This Harry affirms Harry's role as the most prominent death-eater.While wrongly claiming that my argument consists of red-herrings, Pro attempts to camouflage his own red-herring:Con has also stated that Harry mind is the proof that he is the greatest wizard of all times. We are arguing who is a more anti-death eater character, not who is a better wizard.Harry is one of the greatest wizards in the world. His major accomplishment in his life is his tireless fight against dark arts. It stands to reason that Harry is one of the greatest anti-death eater in the world.===Conclusion===My opponent did not present (or attempted to present) any valid argument to show that Snape is MORE anti-death eater than Harry.I presented five good reasons to show that Harry should be considered MORE anti-death eater than Snape. At least one of the evidence was conceded by my opponent.The resolution is negated.Permit me finish by thanking Famer yet again for debating this issue with me. I hope that we will be debating again in the near future.===References===1. Harry Potter and Deathly Hallows, Chapter 332. Harry Potter and Deathly Hallows, Chapter 34