There is a fundamental difference between Christianity and every other Religion

Stipulation: I sometimes say, only half tongue-in-cheek, that the mark of a real Christian is that he will stand up and point at another real Christian, and say, "You're not a real Christian!" Not being myself a Christian, I don't have standing to take a position on whether real Christians agree with Pro's "three fundamental beliefs of Christianity."1) All mankind is born sinful deserving of Hell 2) There is no way for manking to redeem itself except through Jesus Christ (works mean nothing to God) 3) Jesus Christ is the Son of God who died and rose again as a sacrifice for those that have faith in Him. But I am happy to stipulate that this is the form/version/subset of Christianity that is under discussion. For the purposes of this debate, a Christian is one who believes the three things listed above. Their fundamentalness is not under contention. ---Clarification: Pro opposes the belief that Christianity is the same as, and no greater than, other religions. He doesn't offer to show that it is greater, but only that it is different. Obviously, then if Pro intended a trivial debate, he could say that Christianity is different in some trivial way. What would be a trivial difference? On average, more Italians in the Christian religion than others. Only Christians hold the three beliefs stipulated above as fundamental Christian beliefs, as only Satan worshippers hold whatever beliefs they have. Greater per capita production of holy water than other religions. Christianity is the son of Judaism, and the father of Islam. No other religion can make that claim. Started within a hundred years of the beginning of the common era. Exactly 12 letters in the name Christianity. If Pro were after proving trivial differences like that, then every other religion could also be shown as being equally unique. If Pro is after something trivial like that, then let's cancel this debate now, and go our separate ways. But I assume that is not what is going on. I assume that Pro intends, in good faith, to show some difference which puts Christianity head and shoulders above all the competition. Something that makes Christianity fundamentally different from the rest. Something that can't be mimicked or parodied by Mormonism, Jainism, or the proponents of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Something important. Something that---even in the minds of atheists---should set Christianity apart. I'm an atheist myself. (A strong atheist: I believe that gods do not exist.) I believe that Christianity is a collection of superstitions not importantly different from witchcraft, Voodoo, Islam, or ancient Greek or Viking religion. Credulous followers and some priest-types who make a leadership role for themselves by pretending to supernatural powers and/or knowledge. That's what I believe, but I'm willing to be persuaded. So, Pro, if we're on the same page, let's have a debate. If, on the other hand, I have accepted this debate because I misunderstood your goal and purpose, then let's cancel it now. Readers: The Viking religion is unique. No other religion has dead people drinking and screwing while they wait for Ragnarok to come around so they can die again. That's huge. Think how grim and magnificent, as they comport themselves while waiting for eternal destruction, never a one of them flinching from the coming battle that he knows he must lose. Pro proposes, if I understand him, to put that to shame. Some aspect of Christianity puts it in a class by itself, even to the disinterested (but rational) bystander. If Pro succeeds in this goal, he deserves your vote. If Pro establishes only that Christianity differs from other religions in unimportant (to the uninvolved bystander) details, then you should vote for yours truly, Con.