My Opponent is Moar Awesome than Me

Thanks for the debate! =)Summary: This debate is about who is more awesome in two areas, "looks-wise" and "personality-wise". ---- Looks-Wise I have clearly won. I am the only one to have posted ANYTHING about the physical characteristics of either debater, noting that 9spaceking looks like Barack Obama / the Queen / Armstrong / a "hot male" / a "hot female". Hence, 9spaceking clearly looks more better than me. My opponent noted only that my profile pic has a "beard", which (a) isn't my actual looks and (b) is actually a mustache. --- Personality-Wise --- 9spaceking has a better username Again, space is awesome. 9spaceking is the king of space. Hence, 9spaceking is awesome. While some might think of "_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _", this too is awesome. Consider that "FuzzyCatPotato would make one think of "", or 0 spaces, rather than 9. A change from 0 to 9 is an infinite increase. The formula for this is 9/0, because 9 is the new value and 0 is the old (1). Anything divided by zero is infinity (2). Hence, 9spaceking is infinitely more awesome than I am. While cute kittens are nice, as are cute potatoes, remember: This is not a kitten AND a potato, but a mutated kitten-potato. Absolutely disgusting. I have proven that kittens and potatoes kill people, and that this is not awesome. If they were assassins, they would be awesome. Instead, kittens kill for fun (3) and potatoes create orphans (4). Not awesome. While "Fuzzy" does have a movie, this movie involves a man in a fursuit. Not awesome. While my opponent did not create the seal meme, he DID create this instance, which is more work than I did, which is awesome. --- 9spaceking has debate skillz I have proven that my opponent has experience and that experience is awesome. I have proven that my opponent sometimes loses, and that losing is necessary for victory. Both losing and winning are thus awesome, and my opponent has done numerically more of both than I have. I have proven that my opponent is the underdog, and that the underdog is awesome. I have proven that my opponent multitasks, and that multitasking takes intelligence, and that intelligence is awesome. --- I am stupid I use fallacies. To use fallacies implies that I do not understand formal logic, which is proof that I am less intelligent in this regard than my opponent, who did not use fallacies. Because more intelligence is more awesome, my opponent is more awesome. --- I have magic We both agree that I have magic. My opponent contests that magic is awesome. However, magic is "not awesome" (5), according to an 300% expert source. Magic is like cheating -- can't beat your opponent with science or fisticuffs? Just zap him to the next dimension. Truly awesome heroes don't use magic (6). --- I use Paint.NET My opponent and I agree that photoshopping is dumb, and that I photoshop. Hence, I am not awesome. --- I lie I lied, but my lies actually hurt myself, making myself a terrible liar AND untrustworthy. Not awesome. --- I have provided plenty of reasons to vote Con. However: Vote for a tie! If Con's winning, vote Pro. If Pro's winning, vote Con. If neither, vote for nobody! I don't want anyone to win, this was just a fun debate. --- References: (1) mathsisfun.com/numbers/percentage-change.html (2) everything2.com/title/The+zero%252Finfinity+paradox (3) theoatmeal.com/comics/cats_actually_kill (4) dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2409920/Russian-girl-8--orphaned-ENTIRE-family-wiped-deadly-gas-caused-rotting-potatoes-cellar.html (5) ibelieveicanfall.tumblr.com/post/85176541045 (6) debate.org/lies/lies/lies/