Monkey D. Luffy would beat Uzumaki Naruto in a straight-up brawl

I would like to begin by challenging my opponent's definitions of the characters' abilities. Luffy is not capable of extreme speed; he is capable of stretching very quickly (. http://onepiece.wikia.com...). Though entering Second Gear allows Luffy to move quickly, doing so would require Luffy to remain stationary for roughly five seconds, long enough for Naruto to kill Luffy (I will elaborate upon this point later). Also, my opponent has not defined Naruto's abilities clearly enough for viewers to understand them, nor has he accurately described the drawbacks of RasenShuriken use. However, since defining all of Naruto's abilities would take far too long, I will instead provide a link with which viewers can gain an understanding of Naruto's capabilities: . http://naruto.wikia.com... . Furthermore, I will be including the Kyuubi no Yoko in Naruto's abilities, as the Nine-Tailed Fox is a part of Naruto and thus part of his abilities. I would like to end the challenging of my opponent's definitions by affirming the rest of my opponent's definition of Luffy's abilities, despite its verbosity and grammatical inaccuracies. I would now like to define "beat" as "to defeat, specifically by rendering the opponent unable to continue fighting, most likely through incapacitation or death". Now I would like to move on to my own arguments, as my opponent has not provided any for me to refute. 1) My first argument is that Luffy is not fast enough to keep up with Naruto, and his faster attacks do not cause enough damage to kill Naruto. Naruto is capable of easily moving faster than the human eye can see, and Luffy's abilities do not include enhanced speed of thought or reaction time. Even if Luffy were to attempt to enter one of the Gears to combat Naruto, activating a gear takes time, time that Naruto could use to plant several shuriken and/or kunai in Luffy's head. In Sage Mode, Naruto's speed is augmented further, and he could generate a one-handed Rasen Shuriken at a distance, close to close range, and throw the shuriken to injure Luffy enough to kill him with a Kunai. 2) My second argument is that Naruto can outnumber Luffy and overwhelm him. Luffy's techniques are best suited to one-on-one combat or group combat against a number of mediocre foes. Naruto possesses the ability to summon a number of powerful toads and use techniques in conjunction with them. Naruto could summon Gamabunta, Gamakichi, and Gamatatsu (three of his most favored summons), hide inside Gamabunta's mouth, and have the toads distract Luffy long enough for Naruto to enter Sage Mode. From there, Naruto could summon Gamaken, Fukasaku, and Gamahiro, and together Sage Naruto and his toads could overwhelm Luffy. 3) My third argument is that Naruto can outsmart Luffy. Luffy's strategies are all improvised on-the-spot without any real strategic considerations involved. Naruto, on the other hand, is capable of "formulating complex plans in the midst of battle" and possesses considerable deceptive and tactical skill. Given the evidence I have presented and the greater variety in Naruto's abilities than Luffy's, it can be reasoned that Naruto could outsmart Luffy and defeat him. 4) My fourth argument is that, if Luffy causes Naruto severe damage or angers him, Naruto could utilize the power of the Nine-Tailed Fox to defeat Luffy. The Nine-Tails surrounds Naruto in a powerful aura of chakra and increases his strength, speed, and chakra exponentially. Since the Nine-Tails' chakra can cause damage to Naruto's skin faster than he can regenerate from it, it can be reasoned that Naruto would be protected from the majority of Luffy's attacks, which are physical. Naruto can also slash Luffy with his claws and/or stun him long enough to hit him with an Imari (. http://naruto.wikia.com...), an attack so powerful that even the Sannin Orochimaru stated that, if he were to be hit by even the recoil from a Four-Tailed level Imari, he would be killed instantly. I would like to thank my opponent for this debate and the viewers for their time. Please vote CON when the voting period arrives. Thank you.