All Female Genital mutilation should be banned

This is super rushed, I apologize in advance. WHY CONSENSUAL FGM SHOULD BE BANNED The absolute right to bodily autonomy is what I argued against, and something my opponent has now agreed with. However, this does not mean that bodily autonomy should not be considered in policy making. I clearly stated and stand by the fact that it’s a balancing act. So here my opponent argues that you should not be able to do certain things with your body that harm yourself. Hence, proving my case that consensual FGM should be banned. Yes you cannot do certain things with your body, but the mere fact you are harming yourself does not mean an act should be illegal. Eating donuts and smoking is not illegal. The reason drugs are illegal, is because of their overall harm to society, if most people addicted to crack were only hurting themselves, it would not be against the law. If a woman wants to take a razor blade and nick her labia a bit, it is none of the governments business and a violation of the social contract to get in the way of local customs, by making it illegal. If the local society has deemed something acceptable and a part of tradition, then making it illegal is outside of the social contract. It is not a law that the majority wants to keep societ r./zy safer or make it better. it would be a violation of the social contract to attack the culture of society. CONCLUSIOn Unfortunately I screwed up and have 15 minutes to do this, but looking at my opponents ideals for punishments, they are worse than the crime itself. Particularly points 4 and 5 “. Declare war on countries that have not illegalised FGM, tear down their governance and take their children out of this indoctrination. 5. In the 1700's they used to put pirates in tiny cages until they died and their bodies rotted away, this would leave skeletons of such people hanging as shandileers- we should adopt such a punishment and make examples out of them. “ My opponent insists that indoctrination is the same as a date rape drug and then proposes to attack indoctrinated people through war and torture. The punishment does not fit the crime and you should vote wylted. Kinda disorganized here and sorry, but my points should win out. Indoctrination is not the same as date rape, and my opponent is being silly for claiming it is, and their culture is not inferior for FGM, we actually circumcise males in the United States, and that circumcision is as safe as the ones done on females at wedding ceremonies if done correctly and by a trained professional, something that could not happen if my opponent places a ban on it. As far as his argument about banning murder even though it can’t be completely prevented, it is irrelevant. It is a good policy because it actually deters murder, and it gets murderers off the street. The people circumcising women are themselves in some of these situations, so he would lock them up and torture the women. This would actually scare women out of getting medical treatment if something goes wrong when they give their labia a little nick. It has a far better outcome to not ban it so the ritual can be performed by a doctor, and also so women can get medical treatment if something goes wrong, instead of dying because they are scared of my opponent’s recommendation to imprison and torture them or their loved ones.