Donalt Trump delusional train will derail before 2020.

1. Im not sure why you gave a definition of the word scandal, But since were on the topic it even sais right there "legally" which again as I have previously stated he has never been adjucated or been tried for anything, Yes democrats try to sue him all the time, But it would be vice versa for republicans to sue if it were a democractic president doing something against their beliefs. It happens in congress all the time. My point being just becuase he goes against your own beliefs that doesnt mean he's scandalous to the rest of the nation that put him in. 2. Morality in the definition of scandal; don't understand what staff resignations have to do with how moral you are I mean if someone undermines every turn you do or stops your plan then you cut them. You didn't even qoute that he has the more resignation than a 501 (c) so im assuming you made this up. Literally just looked on The Cut. Com from a BBC article it talks about your sex gate point and it literally sais, " a man who wishes to remain unonymous claims he went to the same party as Trump and there is no evidence Trump had sex with these girls that are speaking out about him". On to my next point stormy daniels. Trump said he didn't have sex with her, She said that they did, That is literally his word against hers and its wonder why no action has been put forward in the case. Next point Karen McDougal timeinc. Net, " Micheal Cohen Trumps person lawyer recorded a message instructing of logistics of finance whether to pay with cash, What to pay or what there talking about isn't clear. " This is an allegation and literally without proof shows nothing, Yes there's a recording, But of nothing related to Karen. 3. Chinese and European tariffs, What treaties and diplomatic conventions did the tarriffs on China break you didn't mention even 1 example. It's interesting how you would rather see China advance in economic power and keep us on a leash then free our eceonomy and cut our debt to them. Even if it did cut Chinese ties you have to look out for your own countries exonomy In fact you actually just helped my point and proved that you are trying so hard to prove that he's evil when in reality The purpose of the trade war "is to sharply limit China"s access to cutting-edge US technology and thwart the country"s ambition to become the world"s greatest tech hub. " Vox. Com. My point is just becuase he isn't showing China respect and choosing to help our ecenomy that makes him scandalous? What logic is that? European Tariffs really? Washington (CNN)- President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker agreed to work toward eliminating tariffs and barriers on trade, Reducing tensions for now in a brewing trade war. " Russian collusion? Washington (CNN) House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday said there was "no evidence of collusion" between Donald Trump's campaign and Russia, Siding with the President on collusion one day after he broke with Trump about claims the FBI put spies in his campaign. "In all of this, In any of this, There has been no evidence that there is any collusion between the Trump campaign and. . . President Trump and Russia, " Ryan said at his weekly news conference. "Let's just make that really clear. There is no evidence of collusion. " Dude CNN is anti Trump and they are literally saying the opposite of what you just told me. I dont even get how the boiler room movie idea and these "dealings" you're talking about even connected in this arguement also what dealings I honestly don't even understand your points. Like I yried looking that up and nothing came up, But a song fron tupac so. . . Your 3rd point isn't even factual based data or even an argument. You literally just gave me two definitions of words and asked, " when will you be next? " never gave up any of my political or religious rights. . . Trump literally gave speeches that's not propaganda and even if it is then every president has done that so again your 3rd point is hugely flawed. In your 4th point, " Tea Baggers many of their leaders were absorbed in the Republican party" so. . . The Tea Baggers are republican as they went into the republican party and the other memebers died off so you basically just said tea baggers are republican. You also said you forsee this in the fututre so literally again you're just going off of emotion, Becuase humans can't tell the fututre unless you're magic. I don't understand what these advent 3rd political party is when they died off 10 years ago and sounded like if they absorbed in the republucan party then this party you talk about would die again. 5. No really on your last point you just described what the election will be about so I don't even know what point is trying to be made and no he's not an appretance he chose to ran on his own free will so really all your points on this debate I don't really get.