Google Chrome is more useful than Mozilla Firefox

I will now refute his arguments. First, according to my opponent's PCMag. com source, Firefox defeated Chrome in graphics hardware acceleration. PCMag. com notes. Note that Internet Explorer is irrelevant to the resolution. The chart my opponent is referring to is the FishIE test. As you can see Google Chrome scored a 40 while Firefox scored a 60. There is not a significant amount apart, they are quite near the same scoring. Next, PC Mag conducted a series of tests and noted that Firefox defeated Chrome in four out of the seven categories, including Psychadelic Browsing, which tested rapid color change and animation handling, and a Hardware Acceleration Stress Test. This is directly from his own source; you can check it yourself. I'm afraid this information is incorrect. As you can see Google Chrome beats Firefox in three categories while Firefox beat Chrome in three categories. Chrome excelled in Google V8 (v.6) Score, Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Score in ms, and SunSpider 0.9.1 Score in ms. Moreover, Firefox is better for testing because it offers an HTML viewing mode and thus is used by web developers when testing their website. "When the code of our sites has bugs, often it generates HTML code that is incorrect or even invalid. So we need to examine the HTML code to help figuring what is wrong. While it may be used to web developers, this feature won't be used for the average person. Also, manual viewing of the HTML would have a greater use than the feature which can be done on Chrome. There may be faults in the software that provides the HTML viewing tool. The best you have is an Inspect Element feature that lets you find the HTML code for the page element under your mouse pointer. It is not the same thing. If I selected a region of the page, I would like to view the whole region HTML, not just a single element. This would actually help the web developers. The can select the area that has an error and focus on that individual area rather than having to inspect the whole web page HTML. This would also help the developer find the error quicker. Another annoyance is that Chrome tries to beautify the HTML code. This means that if you have malformed HTML, you will not see where it is malformed, as Chrome will show you a beautified version of the HTML code after have been already fixed. I wish there was an option to disable beautification. "You can easily use the Inspect Element tool you referenced earlier. This easily allows you to find the error in the HTMLIn addition, Chrome is more difficult to use than Firefox; doing simple tasks like shutting off Javascript require lengthy processes that are inconvenient. The same source notes, "Sometimes you need to test your site with JavaScript disabled. The only way to disable it in Chrome is going to preferences and disable it there. This is a real drag. In Firefox you can use the Web Developer extension by Chris Pederick to add a button to the browser toolbar to quickly disable and re-enable JavaScript any time you want. For Chrome there is also the Web Developer extension by the same developer but it does not provide a means to disable JavaScript. The problem is due to a limitation of the Chrome API exposed to extensions. It does not provide a way to disable JavaScript from extensions. JavaScript is a prototype-based scripting language that is dynamic, weakly typed and has first-class functions. It is a multi-paradigm language, supporting object-oriented,[6] imperative, and functional[1][7] programming styles. I don't see why the need to shut off JavaScript arise. The only area I see that you would need to shut off Javascript is when a element in the web page you are viewing is in conflict with Javascript. Moreover, Chrome is riddled with bugs that cause it to crash when it ought to be handling normal, easy project. The same source contends, "The Flash extension crashes frequentlyI do not develop sites in Flash. However, sometimes I need to access certain Google sites that provide useful information presented using Flash. That is the case of Google Analytics and Google Webmaster Tools. Unfortunately, the Flash extension shipped with Chrome crashes frequently. That does not happen when using Firefox to access the exact same pages. "Actually, Chrome hardly ever crashes. [1]Also, Firefox could easily crash from the same areas Chrome may. The problem is that I never got any feedback of my bug reports. So I do not know if the bugs were submitted and received properly, let alone having been seen and acted upon. Chrome focuses more on the actual bug reported than contacting the person who sent the bug; this let's Chrome focus on actually fixing the bug. In addition, Firefox is just as fast as Chrome; Firefox 8 eliminates many of Firefox's 7's problems and is thus just as fast as Chrome is. (Source: . http://www.extremetech.com......).Chrome is actually much faster than Firefox. As you can see here,. http://www.zdnet.com...Chrome had the much better score than Firefox. Chrome achieved a score of 791 and Firefox scored 3341. The lower is the better in this case. This shows that Chrome is much faster than Firefox. I will now address my opponent's refutations. Refutation A: My first contention. I tested Firefox and Chrome on my own HP computer. I also had the most updated version of Chrome and Firefox. Refutation B: My second contention. Actually Firefox and Chrome had an equal amount of wins in each category. Since you never refuted my first contention, this contention is valid. Refutation C: My third contention. Chrome has a much greater selection of apps to choose from with a greater usage. I have refuted each of my opponents arguments.