The god of the Bible is not moral

First of all, my opponent did not address a single fact I presented.Basically he tried to justify the Old Testament by saying it was "due to the historical culture of the time period in question". The word of god does not change. If the Old Testament is no longer valid in modern times, then Christianity itself is no longer valid in modern times.“For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:18-19 RSV) Clearly the Old Testament is to be abide by until the end of human existence itself. None other then Jesus said so.If Jesus is god, then the morality of the Old Testament is endorsed by god.My opponent is also trying to say that morality itself can change. Morality is based on empathy.We have the ability to put ourselves in other people's shoes. Because of this ability, we do things to others, the same way we want others to do to us. For example, we don't go around killing other people because we don't want them to kill us. That's why rape and slavery are immoral, and always have been. The people who justify those things either lack empathy or try to justify their actions by pretending a woman or a slave is not the same as another human. My opponent asks:1. What does the Old Testament directly approve orinsist upon ?As I have stated before, it approves and condones:1. Rape2. Slavery3. Killing of innocent humans4. Undeserved violence5. The death penalty, which is permanent and irreversible, for crimes that can me forgiven or made good.6. Infinite punishment for finite crimes.Nowhere in the 10 Commandments or elsewhere in the Bible does it state "Thou shalt not rape another human being" or "Thou shalt not own another human being as property." The question, What are the deeds or characteristics of the Old Testamentheroes Or worthies? is irrelevant. since what heroes and worthies do in the Bible are just stories of what happened, not commandments.The question, 3. "What attributes are ascribed to the God? What does heenjoin? What does he approve? What does he condemn?" Is directly linked to what the Bible condones, since the Bible is the word of god. Hence you get the same answers as to question number 1:1. Rape2. Slavery3. Killing of innocent humans4. Undeserved violence5. The death penalty, which is permanent and irreversible, for crimes that can me forgiven or made good.6. Infinite punishment for finite crimes.By opponent has only refereed to the Old Testament and has ignored the New Testament.The Bible consists of both testaments.I already pointed out that slavery is also condoned in the New Testament: 1 Peter2:18 Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh. Nowhere in the New Testament does it take back or change what was said in the Old Testament.Conclusion: Both the Old and New Testaments are immoral. They are God's word. They do not change over time. Their meanings do not change over time. Morality is based on empathy. By using empathy, it can be clearly said that the following things that the Bible condones are immoral:1. Rape2. Slavery3. Killing of innocent humans4. Undeserved violence5. The death penalty, which is permanent and irreversible, for crimes that can me forgiven or made good.6. Infinite punishment for finite crimes. I have given specific versus in the Bible that prove the above things are condoned by the Bible.Therefore, The god of the Bible is not moralI want to thank my opponent or taking on the debate. Although he is good at using big words and sounding intelligent, he did not directly challenge the evidence I presented. Instead he tried to justify what the Bible says in general by pretending an old book doesn't count in modern times, "due to the historical culture of the time period in question". even though the book contains the words of god. Please take this into consideration when voting.