Isn't it enough to be careful frm my side not to stand in the middle of the busy roadbut on footpath

"NOW A STUPID PERSON SAYS..." "A wise man once said, do not stand near swamps. You should have followed his words. You can not infer that he has a low I.Q because as you stated, You have never seen him before." 1.Firstly, I have already patented a word "stupid" so there is no use using the word again. 2.Secondly, if that is wise then the definition of wise is irrational and stupid is rational. 3.Thirdly, it is ridiculous that you need to look at someone"s face to judge him of his IQ level. a.If that was so then the IQ tests which happen online would have asked for photographs. b.No wonder why people in the west and democratic people are so prejudiced as they never decide on rationality but on their personal mindsets and whether the person is Indian, black or white, which leads to wastage of talents and their own loss. "It is stupid to think that only one person should follow all the duties while the other is privileged by all the rights in the world." Based on your stories, apparently the driver has to follow driving rules while you are privileged by all the rights in the world, to be able to go on "the footpath near the swamp." 1.Did I say that I have the right to stand in the middle of the road where the driver has the right to drive his school-van? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!! :D :D 2.If I am standing on the footpath then it is my duty as well as a right by not standing on the middle of the road where vehicles frequently go by. "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!! :D :D." "This sentence does not make sense. The word HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA is not in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, and neither is ROFL, LOL or :D. By putting a colon in front of the capital d, "." 1.My opponent is careless, rash and stupid. She is a eunuch who is afraid of extensive research. The word, "haha" is in the dictionary if she spends some effort and goes to the site http://dictionary.reference.com... & so is "ROFL" at http://dictionary.reference.com... and LOL at http://dictionary.reference.com... but she is just like the other girls who grows breasts on her chest and gets afraid of searching the net. Preferably, she should only stay at home, play with dolls and learn to cook. Debating is not her cup of tea. 2.The opponent boasted about her knowledge about grammar by teaching me the rules of English grammar but forgot that in chatting we have different rules. 3.I understand from the fact that she is not an IT literate and has poor knowledge of Information Technology, that is why in frustration she is using the knowledge of English but I challenge her knowledge of IT in response to her challenging my English grammar. She has ignored the fact that it is prestigious and more beneficial to know about IT than to know about English as even those like Copernicus, Galileo etc did not know English but where smarter than Shakespeare who knew English very well. Her actions just prove the idiom for her in my language where a frustrated cat scratches the pillar when she is unable to catch mice. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!! :D :D. 4.Now, it is not my fault if she is not able to reason out why I am laughing. I have already won the medal of smartest person to debate so according to this eunuch or transgender, a person can be crazy but at the same time, paradoxically smart also to win such medal. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!! :D :D. " It is the government's responsibility..." "The government also should..." Put what? Swamps are created only when there are depressions FYI. "My opponent seems to be confused on what actually happened, because he changes his story throughout the first "argument"" 1.You mean to say that first I claimed that I was sitting near the swamp now I am claiming that I am standing near the swamp? 2.Instead of me going for an evaluation, you should go to a De-addiction Center for getting rid of the habitual consumption of alcohol and drugs, because of which you are hallucinating that I am narrating something else which I did not in reality, else you will not land up in jail, or in hospital, but straightaway in the morgue were your corpse will be kept. 3.I just claimed that I was standing in first debate, then in another I also mentioned that why I was standing. Story was "extended" not "changed" for your information. If you do not ask me then I would not tell you unless absolutely necessary. "HAHAHAHA" " "My opponent plagiarized from another source [1] and therefore. "" For the first time, a person will be penalized FOR COPYING HIS OWN WORDS! LOL! HAHA! I put my hand in my "own" pocket and that is "stealing". LOL! You should goto a mental hospital if I have to goto jail for that. ROFL! Get your alcohol and consumption of drugs treated and goto a De-addiction enter else they will take you forcibly with your hands and legs tied up and dragging you to the ambulance by kicking you from all sides infront of your entire neighborhood and airing in live on television, and then finally in hospital wiring your head from all sides to give you electric shocks after chaining you to a bed and confining you there for the rest of your life. If you still do not co-operate, then you will not land up in jail, or in the hospital, but straightway in the morgue where your corpse will be kept. "Yes. Here are my reasons. 1) You shouldn't stand near a swamp" a.)Why? Is it your father"s property that you can cause loss to it by not letting me stand there? b.)I have paid taxes so I have the right to stand there. c.)You did not mention further reasons as to why I should not have stood there. d.)If I am not standing there then who will water my plants? Your father? " 2) You should not go near a moving bus" a.) It is as good as saying, that my plants walked near the moving bus (van to be more precise) as if the plants can "walk" as they were dirtied too by the swamp. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!! :D :D. b.) The van came near me, I did not go near the van, FYI! I did not walk to the middle of the road. "3) You shouldn't have used the footpath that was near a swamp" a.) As if there was another alternative footpath built in the air. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!! :D :D. "4) You shouldn't have paid your taxes that makes roads near swamps" a.) There is no law currently that excuses you to do so. b.) Right now, the topic of the debate is that was the person wrong or not in splashing swamp. c.) I said that both the government and the driver are responsible. If X is driving a bus and comes across a shaky and brittle bridge, which he is warned by the passerby, to which the passengers and owner of the bus give consent to not to drive through but take an alternative, he will be held for death due to negligence if he continues to drive through the bridge, though it was the government"s duty to repair the bridge as he was very well warned too and he also had the right not to drive through but take a detour with the consent of passengers and the owner of the bus. "5) You endangered children's lives by standing near the bus." a.) It is also as good as saying that Titanic did not struck the iceberg, the iceberg struck the Titanic, as if iceberg should not have "stood" in the path of Titanic and iceberg will be taken to the court for that. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! ROFL-LOL!!! :D :D :D :D :D b.) I did not stand near the van (not bus), the van came speeding near me. FYI! c.) According to you, I should have vanished in thin air as soon as the van came near me and then come back again to that place as soon as it went away. You must be irrationally believing in lot of superstitious magic. "6) You should never have used the sentence HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! ROFL-LOL!!! :D :D :D :D :D" a.) Because you are stupid enough to understand its true meaning. 7) You should have never created this debate. a.) This is not your father's site that you can tell me what to do and cause loss to it. "Thank you". F___ you!