Mirza engaged in strategic voting behavior on bluesteel's debate against innomen

Mirza challenged me to this topic and calls me a coward for refusing to accept, so here we go. He is also attacking my character in his debate with tvellalot so he owes me the opportunity to defend myself directly, since he refuses to let me post comments on that particular debate. Rules: Mirza will post his defense in round 1 (he can copy/paste from his debate with tvellalot if he likes). No new arguments in the last round. Strategic - pertaining to or marked by strategy (Random House). Strategy - a plan or method for achieving a specific goal (Random House). The goal in this case was to have innomen win. == My case == Mirza initially voted all 7 points to me on my debate to counter a perceived vote bomb from ApostateAbe. Then Gileandos countered Mirza's counter vote bomb with 7 points to innomen. It was later revealed that ApostateAbe, who hates me for "gish galloping" on our debate about Jesus, had in fact intended to give all 7 points to innomen "legitimately" and had "not vote bombed." Thus, Mirza's and Gileandos' votes were cancelling each other out. Mirza also had posted as his "RFD" that his counter-vote bomb was temporary until he actually read the debate and voted. I checked the debate frequently so that when Mirza finally did vote, I could either counter Gileandos' vote myself or ask Gileandos to correct his vote. It didn't matter, however, since I was far enough ahead of innomen that even Mirza's un-countering wouldn't have resulted in innomen winning. Then two hours before the voting period ended, Zetsubou voted 3 points to innomen. This meant Mirza's vote would have made a difference. At this point, I frequently checked the debate to make sure nothing was remiss because I had had MANY problems with some of the people voting for innomen and this debate was causing me a great deal of frustration. Ultimately, Mirza voted SO close to when the voting period ended that I had no chance to counter Gileandos' vote bomb, even though I was checking frequently. Mirza voted so close to when the voting period ended that he had no chance to leave a full RFD in the comments section, even though he said he would. His RFD seems extremely hurried, if you read it. It also seems unlikely that Mirza had enough time to read the debate in full, if he voted a minute before the voting period ended. He either a) read the debate beforehand and thus should have voted a long time ago or b) if you believe he was having "computer issues," he must have logged on without enough time to actually read the entire debate, in full, so his vote was by definition a vote bomb and was strategic. Mirza admits to knowing that his vote would result in innomen winning (because of Gileandos' un-counter-able vote bomb). Mirza: "I knew my vote would determine the outcome." http://www.debate.org... Mirza also admits to open contempt towards me as a motivation for his voting behavior. He says that he pictured my face when I won the debate and couldn't bear the thought of my elation at winning. This is the reason he voted. Mirza: "I also 'knew' if my votebomb-counter in your favor did not get switched, you'd not care. You'd celebrate your win. You were grateful for all the votes on you. Hurray." This sounds like a 100% admission of guilt. I look forward to Mirza's response.