Science is False

Thank you Powerpickachu21. I am. I am attacking 60% of the people on the website. however, the fact of the matter is that the format and direction of the debate do not require me to disprove or prove any scientific claim. You came in here very rash, and you made assertions which were irrelevant tot he discussion. The fact of the matter is, that You have not studied Abiogenesis. YOu repeated what you were told, or what you "found" to be available to you. The credibility of the sources were in fact 100% unreliable. The Schools, as I have said are privatized to give the Government deniability - and everything they teach you was heavily funded. cash gas asss and grass are the motivations of the Corrupt-governments fueling prostitution, capitalism, ignorance and war. And people go full in with complete obliviousness to the consequences every time sexual liberation becomes evident. The Debate is about: the WAY (REFERENCES) people make REGARDING SCIENCE; NOt the Practice of Science itself. YOu are 100% off base and thus far have provided nothing to the debate PowerPickachu21. as a Notice. Also, the side note about Newton. was a side note** But if you want me to make specific references, to fallacies in the Scientific References people like to make, let us talk about some extremely pricy government embezzlements which advocate prostitution, negligence and capitalism. ~ Dinosaurs: The scientists may or may not have actually done the research. The fact of the matter is there is zero proof. The research could have been squashed by capitalist mercenary groups to specifically contest/test the will of God, because atheism increases female whoredom participants. The finding, whatever they were, easily can be applied to a false Theory, or in any case can be misinterpreted. The validity of the findings are 100% unreliable. Especially since Carbon Dating, logically cannot date something back beyond human activity. Carbon Dating formula's do not account for weather, humidity, sun exposure, submersion, catastrophe etc... and thus have zero relativity once: the factual pattern-retated data regarding molecular composure No longer is founded on observed facts. The fact is that the Behemoth mentioned in the bible has a tail like a ceder tree, it's skin repelled arrows, and it was capable of standing on it's hind legs. sounds rather dinosaur like. BUT, People say It is proven dinosaurs didn't walk with humans, and that they are ancient... That is a false claim. and the actual sciences cannot be referenced. that was two points^^ referencing dinosaurs, and supporting it with carbon dating. There is no evidence anyone in the professional field of carbon dating ever actual believed in it. They were just paid large sums of money which they could then use to pay the dinosaur-theory-converts to atheist whores. BUt let's have fun with Space travel. There is zero concrete evidence, or reliable evidence to suggest that human beings have ever left the atmosphere. The international space stations and all satellites are factually and admittedly (by the International space ascociations) in the atmosphere. The space exploration organization is a multi billion dollar organization which works avidly to convert people to atheism to encourage funding in space exploration instead of poverty. The space agencies OWN all satellites that transfer your information and media data which was paid to be broadcast to you. They are also war agencies. 100% unreliable are all and any references made by people to "SCiences" in that field. We are not attacking scientific method, we are attacking "Modern scientific methods referenced by people on the internet and in public." the fact of the matter is, That the chart of elements is not even USED in the scientific field. It is irrelevant to all scientific discoveries in the field of atomic physicist. They do not use it. and anyone who thinks that being able to look at molecules counts as scientific application needs to evaluate the function of such an act. Being the function of such an act would be the reference to science which is being attacked ~ Redundance. Also. Atoms remain 100% theoretical. they have not been observed. FACT. molecules are theoretical. FACT. Time travel is 100% impossible. FACT - Now is the full accumulation of the Universe in its current state. To time travel, the entire cosmos would need to be rearranged. Otherwise the object, which could not be followed through time, would need to be Impossibly calculated to appear wh- Alright. I'mma make this simple. 1.) In order to Time travel, you must have the exact perfect calculation. 2.) without the perfect calculation the item will not time travel. So, how can you dial the calculation to specific time transfer? 3.) there would be no evidence the item moved, BUT, the universe would be destroyed if it did. 4.) if the universe somehow didn't exist in reality and we pretend that the universe doesn't destroy itself. There is still zero methods available to recalculate and "focus" the algorithm to a desired location. etc.. there is a lot to time travel. Many ways that prove it is impossible. But the math CANNOT ever be done. Because you must account for every single atomic element in the universe prior. AH HA Teleporting. also impossible. A breeze would change the Path of travel between points A and B by innumerable/ immeasurable differences in atomic and electromagnetic differences. When working with a device like that, the entire electromagnetic field would fluctuate from something as simple as a coffee glass on either end, or anywhere between. what more.. well. people say the Big Bang is Fact.. 100% belligerence. I can however prove the third day of creation happened.. it left a geological mark. But that is not relative tot his debate. and if you choose to attack me on it. You aiding my debate. If you wish to discuss it, contact me. Archeology. Saying a stone arrow head is 10 000 years old. there is zero foundation to come to that conclusion. Zero. FAct. the debate is about, People putting faith in the things their corrupt capitalist government needs them to believe in in order to stay uncontested. Because people are morons. I am attacking more than 60% of the people here and far, PowerPickachu21. thank you.