American Cannot Be Made Great Again Unless We Nationalize Housing

I apologize. I'm new here and was in a dilemma. I wanted to say all of that. I guess I'll have to start being less wordy. I'll try to get to know the rules better. Instead of quoting, which would take up so much space, I'll try to sum up statements. I just didn't want to hear, "You are putting words in my mouth'. Okay. I try to be more pithy. My opponent says my idea is utopian. Utopian is defined: modeled on or aiming for a state in which everything is perfect; idealistic. My idea is far from Utopian. I only address two issues to solve: Housing and Transportation. Since there are hundreds of societal issues people care about, I'd have to address them all to be utopian. Therefore he is wrong. My opponents said all I did was list a bunch of things and say they will work. Not true. I simply say we are going in debt because we import too much. We can't make what we import because our cost of living is too high. In order to make the cost of living lower so we can make things, it should behoove us find the best way to make the most expensive bills more affordable. Housing and transportation are those bills. Rent is already just a contract to make people pay for a product over and over in the market, which is a model that could never be applied to all other products because it's a entropic contract. It makes people pay for the product over and over. So, if we actually give people credit for their work they have applied to rental property, their cost of living would be lower more than we could lower any other bill they have. This gives us the opportunity to centralize the development funds, because their still would be development paid by owners because the US needs to develop more efficient and sustainable cities than the existing ones. This would allow us the biggest development budget in the history of the US for residential, commercial and industrial property. In order to lower the transportation costs, we just build with 3D printers with a design to makes the average person's commute shorter and the form of transportation far less expensive. The 3D printing has already been proven to be half the cost and take half the time as conventional building, so we could slam this out. Trump said he wants to make America great again. He won't with just using cronyism or tariffs or tax breaks. I"m sure he"ll make things better, but not Great. I want Great. Great needs great plans. He can if we cooperate and lower our cost of living as much as we can. This plan will do it and keep our quality of life acceptable. This is a concept the layman can understand, Americans can understand. The pro"s take it from there. That tells us how we do it. It's conceptual. If my opponent wants all the minutiae he'll have to quit complaining about word count, because it will take volumes to provide those proofs. Let's just keep this conceptual. I'll try to keep the word count down. My bad last round. My opponents says unions are not nationalism. He is right. But, they are an excellent stepping stone to nationalism. When you asked how things could be done, I told you. I didn't describe this in the first argument because I was trying to keep things as simple as possible. The union would be a practical way to hand power to the nationalist government. A union has a strong arm, is organized, and is what would be needed in my mind to take it all the way and pass the baton to our leaders. A union can be formed by simply walking out on major streets with the idea on a pamphlet and getting small commitments and members. As things grow, you hire more people to canvas apartments. So many people will cooperate because we will tell them they have a right to all the work they collectively applied to the US housing and they will own these properties once we get enough people in the union and a powerful lobby in Washington. Our Democracy promises they represent the majorities will. We tell them we can strike if they don"t respect that American tradition. They will find they will not have enough sheriffs to enforce evictions. My opponent says that credit I'm calling a housing title with their name on it will be valueless. No. It would be worth a monetary amount you can apply to any home in the nationalized market. That would be 75% of housing in New York City, getting closer to 50% across America. I'd say that has value. And more value that the present contract, because the present contract gives them no value and makes them continually pay for the property, showing no regard or respect for their hard work day in and day out in this country in which rent takes the lion's share of all bills. There biggest bill is the most parasitic. My opponent has stooped to simple name calling like we did on the playground. He provided not comparative arguments for how my plan is exactly the Freddie and Fannie plan. He can't do that because there is no comparison. He loses this argument too. Freddie and Fannie were stealing from people, not giving them their fair share for their homes. He actually thinks stealing is the same as representing equity honestly. My opponents says we don't have the tech to do this. He says this even after he gives us a great link to a company that is ready right now to build 3D printed Smart Cities. This stuff can happen very fast if we get aboard. It's just a matter of rechannelling energy we are already using. The Home Depot example was a crude example of how cheap even a conventional efficiency can be if we only thought outside the box for a second. 3D printing offers far more than this. My opponent tried to use a big number of people to make to make an argument. But an argument requires premises and a final conclusion. I"m assuming his argument is this:. He sees 564,000 people laying on their asses watching it get built. Of course that won"t work. But I see 564,000 people on their feet doing the work! That's very practical with strong leadership. You want a food stamp? Lay a brick buddy. Now there you go. Now, are you sure this is so absurd? This plan won't lay off workers, it will be so big, we'll probably have to keep them coming from Mexico. In the end, sure, we won't need as many people for building homes. But we don't need as many people in many other areas and as long as we keep this rise in productivity shared on all socioeconomic levels, keep everyone working, and give out vacation instead of welfare we will do just fine. Wow I have 1,530 characters remaining.