A New Way

Now, in a perfect world, this would work. However, this is not a perfect world. People are not always good. I will assess your points in the order that they are presented: "I believe that if we were to devise a system for controlling population humanely" First of all, overpopulation is a myth at most, and greatly exaggerated at least. If you don't believe me, check out these websites, and you will be more informed on the matter. http://pop.org... http://overpopulationisamyth.com... Next, "nobody hurt or killed and we taught our children the way they are designed to be taught not as those before us have taught theirs" I'm not sure if you are religious or not, but "the way they are designed to be taught" is a very strange sentence. And how would we teach them differently than people before us? Have our parents not taught us that killing and harming is wrong? And suppose you are not religious. If you aren't religious, isn't it within our instincts to harm others when we are threatened? So wouldn't it be an evolutionary (Evolution being our design, if you don't believe in a creator) hindrance if we refused to hurt or kill, even to survive? And will this new government dictate what parents can teach their children? What happens if you do not teach your children "the way they were designed to be taught"? " If we designed a web like politic system with no super power," By this I suppose you mean no leader. However, when you say "we designed" someone has to design this. Wouldn't they be a leader? And how would a government function without a leader? Would the people always be telling the government what to do on every single issue? People would have to spend all of their time that way. "the power that would protect us would come from unity we could find land, be self sufficient" Apparently, we would be self sufficient by relying on others to protect us. This, in itself, is a contradiction. Also, this is the 21st century. Why do we need to "find land"? Are we explorers? Pioneers? "productive and happy people, advanced far beyond where we are these paradigms are crippling us" We are advancing on our own, and I don't think that a commune is going to help scientific and cultural growth near as much as our current system. "Our collective intelligence is the key to true evolution as a people, if only we would set aside prides and use our passion an tenacity for a more efficient, righteous cause, to find truth an to preserve our wonderful future with all the possibilities in the fabric in time waiting for us to decide what we want." Suppose that for some reason, you do know "the key to true evolution as a people", why would a new system of government be needed? People's collective intelligence is being used right now, as the world's best researchers and universities are sharing and gathering information. Also, who is to say that everyone working together (apparently with no leader, and therefor no order) is going to be more efficient than our current system? Competition is good. It drives us to do better than others, and so we achieve higher feats. Now, in a perfect world, this just might work, but in your world, what happens if people don't cooperate? What if your system becomes corrupt? And, possible what I am wondering about the most, why do we need to find land? Please, in the next round, take time to answer some of my points. Thank you.