The Wahabi is the most evil faith in existence today.

OutlineI. IntroII. SemanticsIII. Credibility of Islamic religious texts key to my argument thus not a red herringIV. Judge a religion by it's dwellers' actions, not by the religion's original beliefs.V. Youtube videos act as warrants or proof, not arguments.VI. ConclusionVII. SourcesI. IntroI'm not going to quote every phrase of my opponent and me before it. That would take way too many characters. Instead, I will focus on the main parts of my argument and reinforce them. II. SemanticsAgain, with the semantics. Even if you agree with my opponent, I don't think I should lose the debate based solely upon this. I did make the debate in anger at the injustices in Saudi Arabia. When your angry you don't always choose your words perfectly. III. Credibility of Islamic religious texts key to my argument thus not a red herringThe credibility of the Islamic texts are key to my argument, which I've already shown. If the Islamic religious texts are incredible, then we can only look at the actions of the dwellers. The religious texts then become of minor or no relevance. I've already shown via mainstream science that the likely hood of God existing is extremely low. Which obliterates the credibility of all twenty five of the Islamic prophets and religious texts. [10] Think about it, if God doesn't exist then what is religion all about? Morals? We have philosophy for that, why add all the rituals and piety? Besides wouldn't it be immoral to pass on false beliefs? What justification do we have for all the holy wars and crimes committed in the name of religion if God doesn't exist? None, we have no justification for the crimes committed in the name of religion. This impacts back to the resolution, because the evil deeds committed by followers of the Wahabi faith/religious movement cannot be mitigated by religious texts as my opponent tries to do. The above is key to my argument and I've shown why and how. Therefore, I have proven that this is not a red herring. IV. Judge a religion by it's dwellers' actions, not by the religion's original beliefs.I've made many claims which I've backed up with evidence. Yes, I made some claims that I didn't back up until round two, thus they are no longer bare assertions. My opponent doesn't dispute whether the evil deeds occur or not in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, we can safely assume they do exist. The question remains can Islam or any branch of Islam, in this case Wahabi, take the blame? Can we hold a religion accountable by the actions of its followers? Yes, regardless of how highly your value or don't value a religion's religious texts, ultimately actions speak louder than words. There are many words within a religion. Can anyone honestly state they have read every religious text within Islam? I doubt many have if any. There are exactly 320,015 letters within the Quran. "Quran letters: 320015 lettersQuran words: 77439 wordsQuran verses: 6236 versesQuran chapters: 114" [11] This is just the Quran alone, then there is Hadith. Many of these words contradict themselves. There will always be dispute over the interpretation. Though some passages are more explicit than others. Yet, this is common along religions. The words of an influential person states to be peaceful and the people are warlike. Would we let other moral guidelines get away with this? No, we would not allow philosophy nor nations laws to get away with this. Can you imagine how quickly a philosopher would get criticized? If nations had laws like this we would have chaos. Its not feasible to read through all of Islam's religious texts every time a crime is committed or we feel the need for guidance. Instead, we must look at the actions of the followers and laws of the nations who follow the belief. V. Youtube videos act as warrants, or proof not arguments.If a person say A is true, then links to a video with evidence that A is true, then impacts back to the resolution, then videos can be used as evidence.VI. ConclusionMy opponent unsuccessfully attempts to thwart a major part of my argument by labeling it as a red herring. My argument remains as follows, God doesn't exist, therefore all the Islamic prophets are false, annihilating the credibility of Islamic religious texts. Therefore, all that remains is the follower's actions. Except, for a tangled mess of contradictions and ritual. As for my ignorance, it is true I haven't read all 77,439 words within the Koran. I can only guess at the number of words within Hadith. I contend I know enough. I know that the probability of God existing is extremely low. All that matters is the actions of the followers, and they are performing many vile deeds. Therefore, a person can only conclude that The Wahabi is the most evil faith/religious movement in existence today. Thank you for debating this topic. Have a nice day. VII. Sources10. https://www.quora.com...11. https://www.quora.com...