Gen Z will lead the world in the wrong direction.

To rebut your previous point that there is 'no sense that the generation has been becoming non-productive [sexual wise]', I'd like to state that this is false. There has been tell-tale traits and patterns in many countries. The problem of low birth rates has been circling the news for ages. In countries such as Japan, Germany and Austria, there is so little population growth that their populations are ageing. Soon, their work force will be diminished and instead be overwhelmed with a huge percentage of retired folks. How is that 'no sense' and 'no worries'? Ironically, this reminds me of American thinking. Either way, it will become a problem as generation Z will incline towards earning money and pursuing their own hobbies due to their access to higher education. Therefore, they tend to marry at a later age and this results in fewer years to bear kids.Certainly there are other kids around here who are hardworking and such. However, I was not actually describing kids in America, but rather, mostly kids here in Asia (which is not only the largest continent, but has also incidentally been dubbed having the strictest yet most sensible bringing ups in families due to all the different cultures). The relaxed lifestyle has been in America for so long that it is not unusual anymore. I would also like to point out that diligence does not apply to all or even most children in most schools these days. While it is true for students in countries such as Cambodia, where the children are so poor that they desperately grasp at any education they are offered with an enthusiasm few in developed countries can hope to match, that percentage is much lower, compared to kids in developed, semi-developed or even other third world countries. These poor yet hardworking students however, cannot hope to match the quality or quantity of education given in developed countries and therefore few of their views will actually make it to lead the next generation's society.Also, when I mentioned stricter traditions have been slipping, I couldn't possibly have been talking about America because they do not have such strict traditions. Nowadays, the most hardworking students are actually the students who come from overseas by scholarships. And because they are the elite sent from their country for study opportunities they therefore have a strong academic inclination and due to monetary issues, little contact with technology social-wise. You say that the generation is going to face the reality—they have to, that's true. But can they maintain the system as it is and improve on it as systems have to be, or will they send it in a downward spiral? There are problems in every generation, but Gen Z is the most pampered of the lot. Pampered meaning, they take many (advanced) things for granted. The resolution mentioned nothing about 'chaos', claiming only 'wrong direction'. You have not specifically defined 'wrong direction', therefore it is up to me to specify what direction is wrong. [Apologies if the next few sentences are vague, but I cannot predict the future with entire accuracy and neither can anyone else. Hence I also cannot define what is 'wrong' in one specific sentence because there are many ways in which the world can go wrong and one sentence doesn't simply cut it. I can only assume further based on the path that Gen Z has already made.]Because of the earlier mentioned technology and convenience, Generation Z may be the most savvy generation, but they will also grow up to be a self-serving bunch of people. Their attitude will unfortunately undermine their unique, innovative tendencies. Fewer will participate in or volunteer for things like civil service, and they will likely take less interest in politics. This will lead to a deficiency in leadership, results of which may not be seen immediately, but after some time will ultimately leave a mess for generation Alpha to pick up. Is that not the wrong direction to head for?reduced participation: http://iei.ncsu.edu...