Did Jesus Exist

"Christianity came into existence around 100 C.E." I don't know where you got the idea the religion came into existence 70 years after the events, please explain? "everyone believed in Jesus because someone else told them about him, not because they met him," This isn't true, the original disciples such as Peter, John and James, believed in Christ through personal conviction of his Resurrection the same applies to his women followers, In addition to this, the historian Tacitus was a senator who had access to the Roman Archives called the Acta Senatus and a style of Roman Gazette at the time, which recorded famous deaths and events during the reigns of the Emperors, which is why he mentioned Jesus' death by crucifixion. Also, this isn't a problem, in a short time span whilst the original disciples were alive, you would have to demonstrate where there was additions to the oral tradition in order to disprove it, secondly, there are creeds dating back to the 30s to the original disciples themselves, so we can clearly see that the idea of Jesus' crucifixion came from the very beggining " and the scrolls of the New Testament weren't circulating all that much, there weren't very many of them, and the ones that were often conflicted each other," Again, how can you necessarily know this? What are your sources to coming to this conclusion? In the first periods of Christianity, it was mainly orally spread, with the exception of the letters of Paul, the reason for this was because Christianity was in it's early stages, where the religion wasn't held by hundreds of thousands in a wide range of areas, once persecutions started to occur, and the death of the disciples, they realized they would have to preserve there word, what we find is that when we examine the gospels and early church fathers, written in the time frame of 50-150 AD, there isn't a change in doctrine to Paul's letters, and the creeds pre-dating Paul, the idea of the crucifixion literally is ridiculously early. "in the original scrolls of the book of revelation, the number "666" was sometimes written "666" and sometimes as "616," a contradiction in the texts thus disproving their reliability. " Again, do you have the original scrolls? No, so you can't make this assumption, secondly, I'm very concerned when a Jew tries to talk about numerical contradictions when you look at the Old Testament, there are multiple contradictions between Chronicles and Kings for example, does this undermine the text? No, not at all, does this change doctrine? no not at all, EVERY text has variants, whether or not they affect doctrine is what matters, and none of them do, you never find one Christian stating the crucifixion never happened, with the gospels and early church fathers. Also, this is revelation, which has nothing to do with the crucifixion. Please, demonstrate that the gospels are 100% untrue along with all the other sources, then, and only then, can you claim that Jesus never existed. "S. Constantine got to decide what went into the New Testament and what didn't" Not true, at all, the Council of Nicea is massively misunderstood, and actually had nothing to do with what went within the New Testament, but rather to do with the Bishop Arian, who tried to claim Jesus and the Father are separate gods, in the end he was defeated by an overwhelming majority. There are manuscripts, predating all the Councils of where the New Testament is canonized, none of these documents don't contain the 4 gospels, or the writings of Paul, not one, the Murotorian Fragment also in the 2nd century, gives a canonized list of the Syriac Church, and we find all 4 gospels, and never the Gospel of Thomas, Phillip etc within them. Secondly, even the New Testament book of Peter, calls Paul's letters scripture, Clement of Rome and Ignatius make quotes from Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, but never from any other supposed Gospel/