Donald Trump Would be an Amazing President

My opponent admits that Donald Trump is not the only individual who offers security details about how to keep the U.S safe, with that in mind, my opponent must believe not simply that Ted Cruz's policies are worse than Trump's policies but rather that Trump himself will be an amazing President. So, I do not need to show any GOP candidates are better suited to the job than Trump, merely that Trump is not special in his policies by virtue of pro's emphasis as such. Therefore, Pro must show why Trump would be an amazing president, not the best of a bad lot. An amazing president offers unique solutions, leadership skills and a nuance that allows them to navigate the global political sphere. With that in mind, let's look at the qualities of a leader in reverse as compared to Trump. Does Trump has an endearing, nuanced and intelligent approach to politics? The answer is obviously he doesn't. He attacks his opponents with a blunt and inaccurate hammer calling for even his own GOP candidates which in general support each other's approach to completely, and out of friendly competition but rather fear for his popularity, admonish Trump's wild claims. It must be unsurprisingly that those who are skeptical about calling Trump a good candidate for the Presidential elections, to see the two main parties unite in their dismissal of his attitude and claims. This ought to be enough, Ed Miliband was slammed by the Conservative party for his weak and limpwrist-ed approach to political issues. Trump on the other hand, or other extreme, cannot see nuance or political strategy and while he is happy to preach to the choir of his 34.4% voters, he will not be speaking to them when he is trying to discuss the Palestine/Israel settlements, Sanctions on Iranian Nuclear programs, cultural/social de-progression of the former Soviet Union or even the British& European Lisbon treaty. Whether Trump explicitly stated he doesn't like minorities is not at issue, Trump has and does engage with minorities when it benefits his pocket. Note the investments in Saudi Arabia, the unofficial threat of Islamic Extremism. Which is funny, that Trump lambastes Muslims or Arabs, he doesn't unfortunately separate the two terms, yet he is happy to make private dealings when constructing his gold courses in Dubai to cater for the rich Muslim elites. Is it not self-evident that Trump is simply preaching to the choir, or perhaps scare-mongering to the unfortunates who are sweeped up in his rhetoric? My argument about the first amendment is so simple is ought to be on a t-shirt. Congress can make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. Trump's ban on Muslims entering the U.S. is his proposal of a law to prohibit the free expression of one's faith. You can duck and dive the argument, claim he is doing it only for a few months, or you can say it is 'just keeping on eye' on people, but in reality it is a law motivated on the prohibition of Religion. I suspect my opponent is well-aware of Trump's consistent calls of Islamic terrorism, yet do you really want to pigeon hole your argument to say 'well it's not really about religion' when Trump bans Muslims? You cannot have it both ways. Either Trump's ban on muslims is due to their religion, therefore the first amendment stands and he is in violation of his constitution or Trump is banning Arabs because of his racial prejudice, I think the former is more reasonable, but you have to pick one. Either choice just shows how poor of a candidate he is. There really is not much more to say, my opponent cannot get out of the first amendment bind, and in my mind, it is reasonable to conclude an 'amazing president' ought not to violate the very first of his officially recognized constitutional freedoms. This affects everyone, a limitation of one individual's freedom is a limitation on all, and that is why Trump would be not simply an okay president, but rather a poor president. None the less, even if he did become president, his policies would be filters and softened and the man you see now will not be able to simply build a big giant wall across the country because he promised his 34%. Universal Health Care took months and years of planning and only barely got through, yet you think Trump will deliver on his promises? It's simply wishful thinking, and at that stage, while he is president, the backtracking will almost certainly not making him amazing. I look forward to my opponent actually breaking down his polices, it is not my job to seek out his specific polices, and I wait for a more detailed analysis of why Trump of Security/Immigration/ISIS is so amazing, beyond the assertion of that statement.