Solving the obesity problem - my method

1. "It discourages weight gain far more effectively than my opponents plan. Being burnt at the stake is after all rather painful" I am an environmentally aware citizen and I must object to the buring of the fatties at stake. It involves using gasoline and wood, which we should be saving. Also its way more fun to ridicule then to kill. Futhermore, the burnt fat would simply rise up into the atmosphere and create more ozone damage (proven by NASA in 2005 you unread fool). If we were to kill the fatties off, then we would have to do it locally, e.g. the throwing of the fat ones into the volcanos in Hawii, or the "blubber bashing" of the fat ones in Canada, a more appropriate alternative to seals, which are cute. 2. We are not talking about being "humane" here. We are talking about The Growing Problem. Being humane has nothing to do with it. I am simply suggesting a solution to the problem which is also hilarious at the same time. 3. As I have said previously, the wooden stake is what we should be saving. If you were to kill them off, it would be better done locally. The transportation of all the fat people to the burning area would probably crack the pavement under the weight, creating more cost for the government. Also cleaning up the mess of the burnt bodies would be quite costly and unenvironmental. In this "green era" that we live in, the environment must come in somewhere. 4. Televisions will soon be powered by the kinetic energy created by people using bicycle machienes, not only better for the environment but better for the people aswell! And they would be so shocked at seeing someone so fat and being so humiliated that they would start exercising straightaway to make sure that they wern't on the show next 5. The edibility of the obese people is questionable. Dr. Fredriko Kawashiama conducted an experiment in the year 2003 proving that the eating of obese people inserts the "obese nature syndrome" into your brain, causing the eater, TO BECOME OBESE. That is simply multiplying the problem, creatinbg more fat people to be done away with! 6. Your plan may solve world hunger, but it does not solve the environmental issues of transporting and packaging the weight of the fat. The fat would have no nutritional value, therefore making the hungry countries less hungry but more malnourished. The obese people would soon run out, therefore making the hungry people who would then be so used to getting the food angry that they have now suddenly got no food. The riots and destruction would be collassal 7. Your plan does not prevent overpopulation. Sending food to the hungry countries only encourages them to have more children, seeing as they now have a food source. To combat overpopulation one must leave the hungry people die of hunger. 8. Your plan will not work. I have studied the genetics of obese people for the past 59 years (a major feat seeing as I am only 16!) and it shows that they have an annoying habit of appearing in a mutated form in even people who have never had obese parentage. http://www.exploration-of-the-blubber.com... So therefore your last few points are flawed Plus: the killing of the obese people would only serve to cause riots worldwide. Imagine, even just 10 obese people can cause monumental damage while waddling down the street. Think of the innocents that would be squished, the cars crunched up like can's of red bull, the cracks and possible holes on the pavements, the chuncks taken out of brown buildings caused by the individuals who thought they were in "chocolate land". The cost of repairing this would be estimated at about $400,000,000,000,000,000 Trillion, and that is just for the general repair of one street, rampaged by 10 obese people. Do you want to see your friends and family in smithereens scattered accross the wall, simply because of a riot thought up by YOU? Well? DO YOU?!