THE OFFICIAL IZBO TRIAL; Resolved: Izbo10 should be permanently banned

I love the allegations that the quotes I posted on facebook were bastardized. They are direct quotes of these peoples stupidity. Throughout this debate I have pointed out the stupidity and fuctarded nature of the people on this site. In the comments it has become clear that will not change. If you paid attention to the comments we had a gem of discussion where Masterkage argued that this was an accurate definition of zombie: zomï¿½bie    [zom-bee] Show IPA noun 1. (in voodoo) a. the body of a dead person given the semblance of life, but mute and will-less, by a supernatural force, usually for some evil purpose. http://dictionary.reference.com... This came from a decent source so, it could seem ok. But, since my definition came from a equally good source we neeeded to figure out which one made more sense. S: (n) zombi, zombie, living dead (a dead body that has been brought back to life by a supernatural force) http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu... we needed to figure out which one was right. I pointed out that in Return of the living dead 3 the girl in that was a zombie and not mute. Therefore rendering his definition false. If zombies do not have to be mute then a definition that says they do is false. This is when true fucktardery came out. People on this site claimed that it was an argument from authority. Do you people have a fuckin clue what an argument from authority was. All one needs to do is decide whether the statement that the girl in return of the living dead 3 is zombie. I am not asking you to believe it because they say so, you can judge for yourself. This line of reasoning is about this good. I go to fucktardinary.com and find a definition of dog that says this: a mammal usually with a tail and hair that has 6 legs. I say Benji is a dog and point out that he has 4 legs in the Benji movies. This is not an argument from authority, but alas this is the fucktardery I am forced to deal with on a daily basis here. To call these people stupid and fucktarded is no more of an insult to any one of them then it is to point out Tony Arsenal is a male. It is part of who they are. It is pointing out a fact about them. When it comes down to it, my oponent has never addressed the argument that there is nothing inherently wrong with violating the terms of service or the fact that it is just a matter of opinion whether we should uphold them. Since he has not addressed the moral nihilist position, there is really no reason what so ever to ban me. it is only a matter of opinion. So, technically there is no reason I should be banned. That is the resolution and he has failed to meet it. He has thrown out all sorts of allegations but made not attempt to prove they are wrong. I have pointed out that Innoman is just anti atheists who attack christians. This is his way of getting rid of me. There is no one on the religious forums or on this site who brings the amount of research and top level resources to this site as I do. As, I pointed out I bring Philosophers: JL Mackie, Alvin Plantinga; Scientists: Sam Harris, Victor Stenger Religious Studies Academics: Bart Ehrman, Richard Elliot Friedman, Robert Wright, Karen Armstrong, just to name some of my sources. There is not a person on this site who can boast that they have used better sources then that. Dictionary.com and other definition sites are the norm, while I bring academic research to the table. The allegation that I bring nothing to the table is ridiculous. My other point is the site saw a distinct decline in posts while I was banned. There was a post about christmas for atheists, that was easily cleared up when I got back and gave an accurate historicity of Christmas and how Christians stole it from the Pagans, beginning with Constantine. Sadly, for an supposedly elite site, nobody but me was able to point out these facts. http://www.debate.org... Finally, this is a clear violation of my freedom of speech. If there is one right americans constantly take advantage of it is the right to give our rights away. His argument about this being a website so freedom of speech does not apply is only an reinforcement of that poor way of thinking. Do the right thing, bring this world closer to were it should be and continue to allow ideas to be heard. As is clearly obvious, I learned something from my marketing classes, I wanted my ideas to be heard, and my ideas are always among the most commented and discussed. Therefore my ideas are getting out there to people, the question remains will any of the people here be bright enough to understand them. There is some hope, people like f-16falcon and geo and wnope have understood some of my points.