Four contradictions about Jesus...

It is unfortunate that the CON has forfeited the debate. I was looking forward to continuing to the end. However I will not forfeit any of my rounds, so I will continue to strengthen my arguments. As you have already read, the CON conceded to error in the Bible, then forfeited the debate for whatever reason. For a Christian to believe that the Bible consists of errors, whether small or thought to be insignificant and to still believe that the Bible is inspired does not meet logical standards. A perfect God could not possibly want to produce an imperfect revelation, it would go against his very nature. Since it turns out that the Bible is not perfect, that forcefully and unambiguously implies that the Christian God cannot possibly exist. The errors posted on this debate are just a few. One site I visited posted 475 errors/ contradictions. [a] One of the main objections to this is the excuse that the men who wrote the scriptures were infallible and could not be expected to be perfect. We have seen the CON use this excuse already. This is not a human problem, but rather it lands upon God. If God could not see to it that his words remained perfect than he is not much of a God. 1 Timothy 3:16 states that all scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness. If this is true then God is full of error and is not all powerful, and is a God of confusion, to which the Bible says that he is not in 1 Corinthians 14:33. Yet everything we see in the world today with Christianity only points to confusion, hence the vast amounts of denominations, which really means DIVIDED. Some use the excuse that only the original texts were inspired. The only problem with that is nobody has them. Even the earliest copies (Masoretic Hebrew text, the Septuagint, and the Dead-Sea Scrolls) we have contain errors. So even the argument that only the translations we have today have errors is invalid. The thing that should give alarm to Christians today is the fact that denominations cannot even agree on how one is supposedly saved. They all can't be correct, but then, who is correct? How can anyone know they are correct when they are using a flawed, error stricken document, that they can't even agree on what it says on important issues? When I was a Christian I spent over a decade debating other Christian sects on doctrinal issues. This is one of the main reasons why I removed myself from Christianity. The problem I see with Christians is that they have a hard time looking at their only source of God (the Bible) with an unbiased view. The Bible is not clear and unambiguous. There is no objective way of determining whether the Bible, the Koran, or any other supposed God inspired book is the true divine revelation. There is no evidence that the Bible is truly the word of God. If there is, I would love for someone to bring forth the evidence. The Christian must explicitly point out how a perfect and omnipotent God can provide a revelation which violates his very nature. All I ever get is the Christian bending over backwards to explain away the errors, contradictions, and the historical inconsistencies, and all these things are there! Without a perfect word, the Christian does not have a perfect God, at best he (God) can be viewed in a deistic way, but that only bring up more issues to deal with. If the Bible is not the infallible word of God then how can mankind believe in Jesus, when the Bible is the only source in which you can learn about him. If the Bible was not inspired by God then it was only written by man. If that is the case then Jesus is nothing more than a man made myth along with all the other man made myths that Christians don't believe in. Vote PRO [a]http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...