Theistic evolution is not compatible with God or His Word.

Hi, ok I will have to spell it out for you then. 1. You do not read the definitions, hence why would you give 2 examples of adaptation or genetic variation? 2. You bring up the subject of the flood and ark, and make childish comments about folding paper and the universe?3. You ignore totally my first argument and do not address anything in that, theory of evolutionary 'science'. No rebuttal.4. Just because YOU do not understand the bible and how it is phrased, you can therefore not conclude anything about it. 5. Have you not considered this fact. If you brought a fossil into a court of law and said this proved we came from dinosaurs, you would be laughed at. I don't want people to laugh at you so do not bring up fossils for proof. They prove something died and was buried. Actually most rock layers and fossils contained within them give a lot credence to creation and a huge cataclysmic event occurring. But if don't want to investigate anything yourself, then you will remain ignorant. Medical science is nothing to do with this. Science cannot even prove itself, because it presupposes logical and mathematical proofs. Refer main argument 1, which you ignored.Your bible phrase fits nicely with what you do not do yourself unfortunately.Behold, the fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, And the knowledge of the Holy One is understanding." - Proverb 9:10 6. You do not believe the Bible is the Word of God that's pretty obvious. What's the point of this argument?7. Re Genesis. You have never heard of the hydroplate theory. Walt Brown, look it up online. Still no argument here though. YOU AGREE THAT GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE.8. You do not make any rebuttals or arguments for the references made by Jesus, that the scriptures are the Word of God, and the testament of other apostles. Do you not believe anything that these guys said?NO REBUTTAL given.9. You do not say anything about the soul in a theistic evolution scenario. NO REBUTTALTHE DEBATE IS WHETHER THEISTIC EVOLUTION IS COMPATIBLE WITH GOD OR HIS WORD.To summarise your arguments, that are not really relevant to the debate and definitions:What I don't get about theist creationist is that they do not accept the evolution despite the fact that we discovered dinosaurs, bones of other human cousins. If you guys don't like science, then why don't you guys just reject all the modern treatment that had been invented using science?Refer main argument 1. That's why. I like science very much indeed. You sound like a naive atheist, and scientists are the new gods. You might want to rethink your faith.My argument against theistic creationism. As I had said before, whoever wrote Genesis was not advance enough, as you can see with the verse "God called the sky vault" and the " And God made the expanse and separated the waters that were under the expanse from the waters that were above the expanse" We sent spacecraft through the atmosphere, and it's clear that there's no water between the above the "vault"You are not arguing against this, you are arguing your relgious belief being compatible with the BiblePart of hydroplate theory, the fountains of the great deep were broken up at the time of the flood. Water was under the land surface pre-flood. The whole earth was totally transformed by the flood. It wasn't just rain. I'm not being funny here, but you just sound like some sort of deist, who does not believe anything in the Bible. Sorry.This is why I wasn't going to waste any time with this. I wanted to debate a believer who could justify their position solidly and give me some good srguments. I didn't get either from you.Take care. God bless