The synopsis of account of creation in Genesis are true scientifically and logically.

It is quite clear that, contrary to Pro's assertion, that the Genesis account of creation is nothing more than the primitive attempt by a bronze-age culture to explain the origins of both the universe, the Earth, and mankind. We can utilize several simple points in order to categorically disproves the Genesis creation myth. Genesis vs Science God created Heaven and the Earth, and light on day one. The earth, we learn, was created shortly before light (perhaps after lunch?). The consistency of the earth was (in something of a contradiction) both formless yet with form; apparently a vast ocean. On the second day, God then separated this ocean from the sky, with oceans below, a layer of sky, and water above. On the third day, God then created land, and the various vegetation that exists on Earth. On the fourth day God created the wider celestial universe in which our solar-system and galaxy travel. However, prior to doing this, he created the sun and moon. At this point we need not continue, it is already quite simple to debunk this narrative with the information available. But let's just quickly create a timeline of creation: 1. Heavens 2. Planet Earth 3. Water 4. Light 5. Sky 6. Land 7. Flora 8. The sun and moon 9. the wider universe (stars) None of this fits with what we know about reality. First, at no point in the geological record is there any evidence that the earth was water. In fact, what we know is that the Earth began life as a molten ball of rock 4.54 billion years ago. it was not for another 1.7 billion years that oceans would form. So: 0/1 God also separated the oceans (the deep) from the sky, with water above and water below. This is also nonsense. There is no ocean above the earths atmosphere. This is simply the crude belief that because the sky is blue, and water often appears blue (because of the sky), that the distant blue of the sky is also a vast ocean. It is not. 0/2 We are also informed in Genesis that for at least some part of the first day, the earth existed in complete darkness and that light was created before the sky. This is an odd mind-bending idea. How, precisely, can light exist without a source? 0/3 God then proceeds to create land-masses, archipelagos, and islands, and fills them with flora, including various autotrophic plants. As all High School children learn in elementary biology, autotrophic plants photosynthesize, yet at this juncture, despite creating a source-less "light", the sun, which plants actually use to photosynthesize, has yet to be created. 0/4 At this juncture, God then created the Sun and moon. Of course, we know that the Sun is 4.6 billion years old. The Earth is several hundred million years younger than the Sun, and formed in the solar nebular that also generated the sun. But, Genesis clearly has the wrong order of events, because its authors had no understanding of the solar system. 0/5 We are also informed that the stars were then created, from the text of Genesis, apparently as something of an after thought. Yet, again, this is clearly untrue. The stars and universe which we see in the night's sky is vastly older than the sun, the moon, and of course, earth. The Andromeda Galaxy, visible to the naked eye, is 10 billion years old, nearly twice the age of our humble solar system. 0/6 Oh, Genesis contradicts itself: http://skepticsannotatedbible.com... For a similar, though more detailed, point by point debunking of the creation myth, please look here: http://www.huecotanks.com...