Stannis Baratheon would make a better ruler of Westeros than Daenerys Targaryen

I am going to briefly touch on some of the points con tried to refute then go into counter building my points about Danny. Although I would like to make a brief point on Tywins speech about what makes a good king. My adversary makes a huge fallacy in assuming that being just in his mind equates to being a good ruler. He states that wise people can be evil thus making them bad rules. He even states that Tywin would be a bad ruler (this is entirely false, Tywin is by far the most sufficient person to the rule the kingdom for obvious reasons). For him to validate this poitn he would have to show that one cannot be evil and a good leader. I make the petition that an evil person could be a very good leader, as we can see in Tywin. Wisdom applies across the board and stand, because with wisdom comes my adversaries sub points of what make a good ruler. Military strengthpotential to leadability to maintain wealthetc and so forth, wisdom is at the heart of this because without wisdom one would not be fit to rule as Tywin shows in his speech. R1) On Stanis's leadership and military capability. There are a lot of issues my adversary brings up in regards to this, which are false. He first states that Danny has advisers to, and is more likely to take their advice than Stanis. This is in response to my point that Stannis is often used and lacks the capability to rule by himself. I showed by his inability to effectively speak for himself in the bank of Bravos and his blind following to Melsandra which in turn led him to burning the 7 and almost killing some of his loyal followers at Melisandras wish. The issue with this is that Danny does take council, but she decides for herself. When Jorah betrayed her, she discarded him. He had advised her many times not to take cities, or do certain actions and she literally almost stated. I thank you for the advice but the final decision is my call. Meaning she weighed the voices of her counselors but she was her own persona and made her own calls unlike stannis. While Danny often does take council advice from her counselors, she does not adhere to stupid advice from them. Note when Melsandra has Stannis almost kill one of his loyal followers and threatens anyone who does no follow the lord of light[1].In addition to this he took Melsidanres advice on blackwater bay as I stated early. He was advised multiple times against this by davos and was a poor decision that he was baited into by following Melisandre. This cost him nearly his entire army and left him broke and without the ability to defend himself. He follows people blindly, and does not think before he acts. He lacks the ability to think by himself and trusts people without considering the choices he makes. A) Renley and Stannis inability to leadI refer you to youtube. [2]Renely came to address him as I stated early and was quick to claim that people under his banner did not trust him and were no loyal. My adversary says we can not take Renlys words at face value and that is true. The issue is his words were true enough to have him murdered before he could try to overthrow Stannis (this was due to the fact he was right). Melsandre used black magic to kill him in his sleep before he could try and overtake Stannis. This gives extreme credibility to his statements about Stannis and his followers not liking him. He was murdered because of this. Renly hits the nail on the head. He chose to have no friends and that is a weak man. Now Back to Daenyrs and why she would make a leaderC1) Ability to learnThis is a false statement by pro. The ability to learn to lead is a rare trait. Not everyone is cut out for it. Danny in the span of two years has massed an army greater than Stannis, has more loyalty, and is able to lead with and make her own decisions. This is something that it took Stannis a lifetime to do and that he still does not do effectively. In 2 years she has became a better leader than him. The question is who would make a better leader of Westeros. That is the resolution ,so we are reviewing their current ability to rule and their future ability to rule. Danny with her ability to learn and adhere to advisers advice without faltering from her own choices makes her a great leader and gives her a gift that Stannis will never have. C2) Mental FortitudeMy adversary bases his response on this from the Khal Drogo incident and how she responded to it. My adversary commits a fallacy here due to the time spam. Currently we are 2 years past that incident. The danny then is no the same danny now. It is because of Drogos death that she is the leader she is. This is when she had no army, no ability to lead, and had never lead. After this incident is actually when she first started to lead and take control of herselfMy adversary is basically saying she is not fit to lead because of an incident before she was put into a position to lead makes her a bad leader. We can discard this argument. He also misunderstands what she did with the slavers in Meereen. She killed the slavers who opposed her rule and that committed horrible acts to slave children. This did not shatter the economy, my adversary will not find a source for this and it is a false assertion. She set people in charge of the slaves and let them be free while assigning the unsullied to take care of the city and maintain order. Actually later on a slaver approached her and asked her to go back to her master, where she set up a year contract for slaves that actually wanted to be slaves. This again shows her ability to compromise and make rational decision. [3] ( you can view the transcript and slave conversation in the last few episodes. This is where she sets up the contract)His points fall flat. C3) FollowersActually some still follow her, although it is not evident in the show but they follow her. Just stating that she does not have them is false, the show just does not focus on them and chooses to stay with the unsullied and other parts more. She still had hundreds of them that followed her after Drogos death and that stuck with herHe then says this" Regarding the Unsullied - They were conditioned to be fighting machines, and given no alternative path, freeing and then asking them to fight for her is an emotional blackmail and mainly served her own conscience"This is false. They did have the path to chose, she offered them freedom. She told them to make their own choice and they *chose* to fight for her. She gave them the ability to do what ever they wanted or to fight for who they wanted. They chose her because she freed them. C4) Ability to ruleShe is ruling meereen. Whether or not he thinks it is a weak starting point is a non sequitur. She has established wealth, compensates people that he dragons harm (greatly), got control of trade in the city, and keeps justice with the unsullied. This is not even considering the fact that people are drawn to her and she can rule in general. All the way from Drogo to currently people have took up arms for her and chose to follow her because of her ability to rule. Stannis does not have anything near this. C5) Strength of armyMy adversary says that her ability to challenge kinds landing is irrelevant I disagree. She possess the ability to take kings landing, and this includes feeding more people in to follow her. Her ability to rule from there would be unquestionable. She would have the most powerful army in westeros in general and be able to lead with strength and wisdom. Military prowess is a key point in leading. It helps her maintain and gain wealth along with maintaining justice. ConclusionDanny has a draw to type personality. She draws people to her and they love to follow her. She has a powerful army, has high intelligence and possess the ability to rule with a iron first. She is well suited to be queen[1] http://awoiaf.westeros.org...[2] [3] http://foreverdreaming.org...