In defence of Atheism, Prove me wrong

Right on. I enjoyed that. Thank you. but I remain curious if you actually read the argument prior to the last, before posting. Because you actually responded as though you were typing up your rebutal as you read it. You never clarified this. Or said it was not true that you had been typing as you read it. Being the Heckling, interrupting before acknowledging the direction of the debate. However, my portion of the debate is not to convince you of anything. I only need to be self sufficient, as is the apparent qualities required of evolution. I am in no way trying to convince you of anything. The links I linked you to, regarding creation, I clearly indicated I wanted you to read my comments, not my debate. And my other debate, with a similar title to this one, Was to clarify, Creation is factually scientifically sound, and the available resources are out there for you to actually do the work yourself. As you had ignored my comments in this debate's Comment Section, you seemed to have skipped, thrice now, that My "Notionalism" - post, was clearly provided to be, and was indicated to be, not apart of my actual debate. And I did not format it as a debate either, nor is it even possible to argue with it, as I had suggested. To explain. Being that all notions are outside time, Nothing actually does occur. The are simple existent in the unmanifest nature of: Everything that has capacity to be imaginable, whether imaginable or not, exists as that unmanifest characteristic of itself. Everything. And outside time, where God is unchanging, as he never changes, nothing occurs. Saying, "God damn it." also, is not actually using the Lord's name in vain. That can be a very accurate manner of using the Title of God in direct association with condemning something. There is no vanity in saying, "God damn it." if someone were to rush off with a nuclear bomb after you struggle endlessly to defend it, and you are deep down int eh subconscious parts of your mind screaming, "Damned be that that bomb explodes!" (as in, "do not let it occur God, it is beyond my capacities now.") Vanity is saying, "Jesus wants you to have sex with that old man." perhaps when talking to a Muslim girl wed to a 50 year old man. Or Allah*. This is vanity, because now the name of God is being misconstrewed with blasphemous heresy which makes God look like he is the evil character in this situation. Or if an atheist says, "God said to kill people." referring to the genocide of the People previously inhabiting the promised lands, without considering that in Gods wisdom ~ (whether he is real or not, because when reading all the texts of the scriptures as a book, you must at least acknowledge temporarily to get an insight into his character, that he is all knowing and wise, and is declaring such a thing for a just reason. ) ~ he knew that if these people were to be given the chance to become a great nation it would be a horrible nation filled with the worst slavery, rape, and unjust people who would ravish the world. It is in vain to bring up God, and spite not only His Wisdom, but Wisdom itself (the same thing) for the sake of simply making the image of God appear negative to others {even if that is not the intent}. Again, I did not say that, Atheist or Adulterers promote rape and abduction, although many secretly do, I do not associate this quality to others. But Atheism and Adultery do. Quite factually. As no unfaithful man or sinner represents any religion or faith in God, only atheists do this. Via indicating through words and actions others with less moralities are strengthened in their ambitions to do whatever they want without moral restraint. Rape and abduction are incurred via jealousy of to adulterers. Abusive boyfriends/husbands/people are typically the result of unprepared parents, foolishly unparented friends, a government being grosely ruled by an immoral careless Atheist regime . And as none of this is a direct assault on any individual, all atheism does is promote bad things. Kratos vs this Other god: As Kratos is the eater of Gods, and your other deity the most benevolent thing. (forgive me I had wrote Kronos by accident) As neither have physical forms to combat eachother, but it is a war of conflicts in metaphorical philosophies and physics, Kratos being a construct lawlessness, speaking a foolishness that has his chin impailed, and his authority stopped outright, and This being of Benevolence serving only to strengthen him. They stand both the lesser. For to imbue foolishness with foolishness is to it's own dismay, and to increase the authority of Destruction with foolishness is self condemning. (as Kratos, tries to usurper intelligence with might*. The entity, but not living being of strength cannot overcome Insight or wisdom**) For to give Only strength to an entity of Timeless origins, unchanging in nature, Strength does not manifest Glory and authority. *Spode, without the characteristics of being completely aware of all things untimeless, cannot be God, and as strength is not a manifest quality required to rule Heaven, he would loose even to Kratos, who as a Titan is not a god, is infact an essence of reality, not a being.* So. We have a comment section. if you had been confused about anything, we should have discussed it. As arguing that I have not provided sufficient evidence or facts, or sensible content, was without grounds - in likeness to a discussion revolving around, the potential for the light reflecting off the moon to be the cause of all effects credited tot he gravitation pull of the moon on the tides - One should first take the moment to review the available resources before disputing no credible evidence or points of have been established. And As I stand that, -atheism, is the idea God is not real, meaning math is the controlling condition of all things: Free will cannot exist because everything is predispositioned. That cannot stand as an argument in court, the insane asylum, or if someone were to steal your child, or kick your shins. Thus, indicating atheism is not a dependable premise. -Creation. light = time (energy=movement of matter [measurable difference in a period an event occurs]). Sky and liquid water are the same molecular compound. The earth is proven via geological formation, to have expanded form within itself when energy first entered it. Plants came accordingly when energies could not re-enter the pre-energized waters after exiting the earth, being very plausible. Stars thus follow as the sun accumulates itself int eh vaccume of space, forging the moon, distancing the sun from earth, then the Mercury and venus planets, followed by Mars and it's moons, The astroid belt, and Jupiter and beyond, until after the Oort cloud it creates a new star and goes forth. All Because Earth was a perfect condition for the self aware universe to ignite the first mote of exponentially expanding energies of Light.. Thus with faith this is accurate to an iota, We can have faith that the fifth day was all egg baring creatures, which would hatch on the next, when Man who received this message was fashioned from the earthly and watery molecules of Mud, as there was yet plants to eat. {explaining Adams exhaustion at the end of the day, when he fell into a deep sleep because The Lord God, who is the wisdom of the universe, dictated it should be so.} -Morals are founded on religious practice. Review this yourself with simple consideration of human behavior, readily taking into consideration Christianities role in your own life. Having given law to the Wild west, and the natives of South America before us. Those morals many speak of innately come from all people, in reality only come from upbringing, and factually ... people crap int eh water supply and say, "where else am I to go?". Yet they disregard they chose to pay to live in a city. They chose to have no where else to go. Even int he desert of Arizona and Mexico, it goes in the water. God did not only clearly indicate, bury outside the encampment, (where a dog can dig ti up and lick your kid, or people quickly disregard respectful adherence to what it means to Love God, and drop it lazily without burying it, or one might try the same location to bury it), but it is also writing, "Who to those who build their house beside another mans house, or their farm field beside another mans farm field, so that there is not more room left int he land for the travelers to live amongst them, so that there is less than an efa of wheat on their land, and that they are made to live alone in the land." {family and spouses being of the same flesh.} Proverbs** This is a clear indicator of the same wisdom God's faithful servant Abraham, {he who's origins are in likeness to the hindu nations} had when he told Lot, "There is to many people among us. Chose which side of the River shall be yours. The east or west.", closely followed by the the smallest recounted naturally occurring deaths of any man, Joseph, the Man who lived in the great Egyptian city. God's wisdom is reoccurring and eternal. It is apparent in every day life. Though there are those who say, "morals can be found in anyone", how quickly people turn from them. As for when "supposedly" God commanded the one-million Israelites who crossed the desert to Go desolate the peoples inhabiting the promised land. How quickly they turned from him, complained and rejected him. How much not greater the treacherous rebellion of those people within the promised land should he have beseached them ~ this would have been the true wrath of God! So. my philosophy is Grand. The God we have, Is, as he is in fact the accumulation of all things, and nothing more. As all things cannot be seen or known, he is these also. And because he is all things - *that is what he is* /all things are in him, and he is in all things - this God, my God, The God, ALL THINGS factually are. And the universe in it's construct is perfect in itself.