Is it possible to romantically love more than one person at a time

1.) Romantic love is defined in this case, as expressing mutual feelings of intimacy through unique connection and non-physical attraction, it is built on respect, and driven by honesty. 2.) Lust nor having sexual relations are involved in this case of romantically loving people, based upon what is defined as romantic love. This is understood and accepted by my opposer. 3.) Connecting on a deeper level with a person and having a more emotional, mental, or spiritual attraction is defined as having a mutual perception of intimacy. Intimacy may evolve and claim dominant over the other factors of romantic love, respect and honesty. 4.) There is no real restriction on how people approach love, there is no law. If one chooses to have multiple partners, it may be frowned upon, but at the end of the day it only concerns the people involved. This statement still stands, because it claims the fact that just because something is frowned upon by others, doesn"t mean that romantic love for people just stops due to the opinion of outsiders. 5.) To explain what was requested from my opponent"s Premise 6 in round 3, when compared to a monogamous relationship, a polygamous relationship doesn't have the higher consequence of cheating or losing interest/getting tired of one another, because of the fact that in a polygamous relationship, those involved are completely open about romantically sharing each other, and they are fine by it. If there"s an agreement and acceptance of how romantic love is being spent, there is less of a chance that there will be cheating. Also, those in a polygamous relationship may be less likely to grow out of their life style, because they are enjoying how they choose to love. On the other hand, in a monogamous relationship, there"s a possibility that one partner may be fading, getting less attracted to their romantic partner, testing commitment. 6.) My argument that it is possible for a person to romantically love more than one person simultaneously still stands. Premises that I have outlined in the first round, remain true even when my opponent tried to contradict them. To prove my point with what my opponent said about crushes in her round 3 response (premise 7), if having a crush on multiple people is possible, then it is indeed possible to have the potential of romantically loving more than one person at once. A crush leads to a potential for romantic love. 7.) To correct my opponent on her defense in round 3 (premise 10) , if romantic feelings are contained by self-control, then there will never be a potential for romantic love. Since this argument is based entirely on the subject of romantic love, having absolutely no potential for romantic love is bad. Other positive consequences of containing feelings of romantic love by self-control, such as never exposing oneself truthfully to another, such as attaining the quality of patience, are unacceptable in light of the negative consequences of containing feelings of romantic love by self-control. Thus, one should not let romantic feelings be contained by self-control. To prove myself even further, this act allows one to surrender to romance, letting an admirer fall straight into the arms of another. 8.) Therefore, it is possible to romantically love more than one person at once.