Atheism is more a product of indoctrination than Theism

Thanks to Con for accepting!1: We see that almost every nation on Earth has been predominantly theistic, throughout the whole of history, while there were no atheist states before the 20th century. Even those had to rely on brainwashing through the enforced teaching of atheism in the classroom - see Mao's China or Stalins Russia. In this image from the Pew Research Center we can see that the only population on Earth whose majority is unaffiliated to any religion, also happens to be the one with the most recent tyrannical atheist government. This would strongly indicate that the resolution is true - atheism is largely inflicted through indoctrination. Unless con can show that every other country in the world did more to indoctrinate their population into theism than China did to indoctrinate theirs to atheism, this debate will be very difficult for him to win. 2: We see that when the Atheistic regime is thrown out of such a country, (which, by happenstance, it always eventually has been), then the people revert back to Theism as a default position, under their own volition. Again see Russia or China. The growth of Christianity in China today is such that by 2030 it is estimated that there will be more Christians in China than America.http://www.telegraph.co.uk...This image shows the immediate and continued fall of atheism in Russia since the destruction of the atheist-indoctrinating Soviet Union 3: Since 1970 and the dissolution of the two major atheist states in Russia and China, the % of Earths population which is atheist has fallen from 4.5% to just 2%. This is due to both populations resounding rejection of the enforced doctrine of atheism, and the new freedom to believe what comes naturally, rather than what was taught. The huge numbers of new theists in China is more than cancelling out the small gains of atheism in the western world.http://www.cnsnews.com...4: Scientists have hypothesized that belief in God is part of the Human nature, and that children left alone on a desert island would come to believe in God. This would necessarily indicate that belief that there is no God, is something which must be taught.http://www.telegraph.co.uk...http://www.ox.ac.uk...5: The same study also found that "people living in cities in highly developed countries were less likely to hold religious beliefs than those living a more rural way of life", suggesting again that atheism is synthetically inflicted, whereas theism is natural.6: In this image we see a map showing the importance of religion to each nation We see that 'developed' nations are always less religious than 'undeveloped' nations. What do developed nations have which others don't? They force their children to sit in a classroom their entire childhood, cut away from nature and being forced to learn 'atheist creating' doctrines such as evolution. More of the population is located in concrete junglers, passively indoctrinating people into atheism through a synthetic environment which keeps their minds away from the wonder of God. (ie no-one in a city gets to see the stars at night). Also they posess far greater access to all forms of media, through which small groups of people can influence billions. I would postulate that all of this accounts for the difference in religiousity between 'developed' and 'undeveloped' nations.In summary: all of the evidence indicates that atheism is far more a product of synthetic indoctrination, than theism is.My opponent now will present his arguments to show that theism is more a product of indoctrination that atheism.