All feminist should be MRAs

You are partially correct in your definition of feminism. Feminism is an ideology for the equality of the genders, but many feminists recognize the bias against women in most areas. Or, as you stated, a patriarchy. A patriarchy is a system where men and masculinity are favored over females and femininity. Oh, and by the way, most of the "problems against men" are the result of said patriarchy. Let's review them.1. "Men have to achieve dominance": Well, this isn't exactly correct. A better statement would be that men are taught to be dominant, and dominance is more easily given to them. I, as a boy, was told how to lead and take control, where my female counterpart would be called bossy. However, I find it kind of cheep to say "I am given a higher standard but more opportunities to reach this standard and thus the system is not in my favor.Let's examine this from the female perspective. We see that (in January of 2013) women made up 18% of Congress, 20% of Senators, and 18% of Representatives (not even going to mention 0% of presidents)[1]. Perhaps there is a higher standard for men, although that hasn't been demonstrated, but as you I have shown this works more in the male's favor than against. Even if you disagree, then the negative effects of having 80% of the government represent males then those effects would be the fault of a system "favoring" men; a patriarchy.2. "We respect women's achievements but don't adress masculinity": To be honest, I don't see the connecting points here. By the way, the only reason there are events like Women's History Week/Month, was because the achievements of women were being ignored, so not really a point in your favor. Even with Women's History Month, some spectacular achievements by women are ignored. From the link I'm giving [2], about 95% of awards for hard scientific achievement are given to men. Also, the rate of which women are nominated is inconsistent with the rate of which they win. Some more examples of how women are not given enough credit: a woman arguably created the genre of science fiction in writing Frankenstein (Mary Shelley), and a woman was the first computer programmar (Ada Lovelace). Both of those fields are now considered a male dominant field. Women in science fiction, and especially gaming (which I will try to hit on), are harrassed by the males in their respective audience.Thus we reach the final part of your argument: "we don't adress masculinity". I will agree with you on the most part, that men are expected to be tough, strong, and fit... Oh, well, except for the fact that men are allowed to be ugly, fat, and old in most forms of media. But they aren't allowed to feminine, I concede. Almost as if there was a system in place that favored masculine traits...3. "Men can't be intellectual or they will be seen as scared": Again, I don't see how the latter half of your premise is connected to the first half, but I will just disect it the best I can. While this may have been true at some point, it certinly isn't now. People such as Einstein, Newton, deGrasse Tyson, and the such are not only respected members of the field, but also revered in most of the public, with the possibel exception of the more religious people. If you live in a stable country, you will be pressured by your parents and your society to get a college degree. In fact, if you go for a more physical career, like basketball or the such, most people won't even think such a possibility is plausible, or favorable.Yeah, not sure where the coward part of this equation comes in.4. Feminists don't believe men have problems: As a feminist, I disagree. Men and women face problems, and we can trace this back to a similar source: the patriarchy! Oh, but here is when I reveal the trick up my sleeve, the surprise argument you weren't expecting: Men Rights Activists are not for the equal rights of men! Mwuhahahaha! Case 1: Men Rights Activism (MRA) is a response to feminism: If one were to fight for equality, especially against a system of rules that existed for such a long time, one would expect an organization to exist for a long time as well. However, it started in the 70s as a response to feminists threatening traditional gender roles [3]. "But YaHey," I hear you counterarguing, "the Republicans weren't always old, white, racists! Movements change!" Yes, this is true, but to see where one is, it is important to know how one started. But this is only argument 1!Sexists in sheep's clothing: I argue that most MRAs are actually just misogynistic sexists. This can be shown in the "Don't Be That Girl" campaign, which made a big show of false rape accusations. Despite the fact that a miniscule number of rapes are fake and so many rapists are never caught, these MRAs wanted to put more doubt on rape claims. Here are some links for further reading why the MRM (Men's Rights Movement) is trash. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca...http://debunkingmras.wordpress.com...The Last Refutation, or Feminists should be MRAs: Here we see something I wanna call a DOUBLE STANDARD. You say feminists should become MRAs, but not the fact that MRAs should become feminists? If anything, the latter should be true, since feminism encompasses both genders, while MRAs focus on men. However, there isn't the overlap you want to claim is there. The MRM, as a response to feminism, cannot therefore become feminism? Just like atheism, which is a response to theism, cannot become theism. The two sides are not compatible. Sources: [1] http://www.nwpc.org...[2] http://jezebel.com...[3] http://en.wikipedia.org...'s_rights_movement