The Big Bang

Sadly my opponent has forfeited, but because of all the rounds left in this so-called debate, I will get the rebuttals over with before concluding (so to keep the readers entertained!). I agree that religion is not the belief in God. Religion implies the rituals, practices, and moralities the people believe in, and the belief in God is a relationship instead. I am arguing that God created everything and did not start the Big Bang nor evolutionism. REBUTTALS. Starlight Problem The reason this claim is often made is because science has calculated some stars to be millions of light-years away from earth, yet we can see them today. A light-year is the distance that light can travel (about 186,000 miles/second) within one year"s time, which is roughly 6 trillion miles. At the estimated current speed of light it is calculated that it would take millions of years for the light from one of these very far stars to reach us. Gravitational Time Dilation: Einstein formulated a theory that the fabric of time and space is not always constant, but that it can in fact be different throughout the universe. He predicted that time itself is affected by things such as speed and gravity in his theories of General and Special Relativity. One aspect of his predictions is that time itself tends to slow down the closer an object is to a source of gravity. This has been shown to be true through many experiments such as synchronized atomic clocks, that when one is taken into orbit, or even on an airplane it comes back with a slightly different time. It is also seen with clocks that are at sea level vs. those on mountains. Although they may be set at the exact same time, the ones further away from earth (mountains, sky, space) tend to experience time faster than those on the earth. If the earth itself were in a cosmic "gravity well" then time itself may in fact be ticking by quicker in other parts of the universe where these distant stars are located. Although God may have created everything within those same six days, what the earth has experienced in thousands of years may be affected by Gravitational Time Dilation and other parts of the universe may in fact be millions of years old at this point. http://www.lloydpye.com... Background Radiation doesn't only support the Big Bang, in fact there is lots of evidence that goes for creation too. Recent data from cosmic microwave background supports creation theory [3] Dark Energy (More rebuttals) In 1934, the first warning signs began to flash the message to the scientific community that the currently accepted theory regarding the structure of our Universe was fundamentally flawed. Because the velocity of rotation versus the distance from the galactic center cannot be explained by only the visible matter in the galaxy, the assumption that the visible material makes up only a small part of the cluster became the standard explanation accounting for this mystery. Since then, the "missing" matter supporting the extra required gravity has been called "Dark Matter", which is imagined to be of unknown composition, transparent, and absolutely undetectable by any means, other than the massive effects of its gravity. As much as 74% of our Universe is imagined to be composed of this nebulous, phantom Dark Matter. "Dark Flow" is the last mysterious and invisible force that seems to be required to account for another mystery of recently observed gravitational effects. Vast areas of the Universe are moving in seemingly discrete currents, and in directions that cannot be accounted for by appeal to the known laws of physics. This time, not even a serious guess has been made to account for an imaginary source of the necessary gravitational force. Nothing has been pulled out of the knowledge vacuum besides hand waving and more smoke. The currently bankrupt state of cosmological theory could not be more starkly illustrated. The scientific community of our planet has been attempting to understand and account for these multiple anomalies of absent and excess gravity for nearly eighty years now. They are stumped. Their responses have been not only mutually exclusive but, also totally lacking for evidence, amounting to a "Deus ex machina" rationale. It is the Multiverse that perfectly accounts for the so"called "Dark Matter". It is not invisible particles, or particles composed of an entirely alien form of phantom matter that is the source of extraordinary amounts of gravitational force causing inexplicable rotational speeds of stars in seemingly ordinary galaxies. It is quite simply common, mundane gravity. It is the "ordinary matter" of the rest of the Multiverse projecting its gravity across the higher dimensions that separate each unique Universe. Plain and simple. It is also the vast Multiverse that sweeps away the need to construct a bizarre appeal to a dilute and universal repulsive force; the strangely labeled and mysterious fiction of "Dark Energy". It is our familiar and common force of gravity, emanating from the uniform ambient background gravitational field of the Multiverse "outside" our Universe that is driving the accelerating Universal expansion. It is not an undetectable source of "antigravity" doing that work. [4] Big bang problem #1: Missing antimatter problem. (Baryon number) How much in the universe, ZERO. One fluke exception is not an answer either, there should be plenty. Big bang problem #2: Monopoles problem. magnets have +/- and at high temperatures greater then the core of a star can create singular poles and the big bang started at infinite temperature and that would be hot enough. Guess how many we find ZERO. #3: Singularity point problem. The Big Bang DOES NOT even explain the origin of the universe. How did that singular point get there? Problem #4: Known physics breaks down in this situation. General relativity (powerful gravitational fields) and quantum mechanics (very small situation) exists separately but there is NO physics currently that can explain both situations at the same time which is what the Big Bang requires. Known physics cannot describe that (big bang) situation so big banger's take it on BLIND FAITH that if such physics is ever discovered that it would even allow for the theory of the big bang. Problem #5: Population 3 stars there should be these type of first stars everywhere all over the universe. Any guess to how many are out there...ZERO! All stars have trace amounts of the heaver elements. [2] Many times the Big Bang has been researched. What has become of this research? More controversy and more frustration for the atheists, except for the ones who were never told that all these fill-in stories such as Multiverses are fake, of course they are innocently ignorant as the mainstream science and media doesn't tell them everything that would unveil the dark secrets. But I want all to know that there is a vast amount of proof for both Creationism and the Big Bang--even though the Big Bang Theory is most likely just evidence floating around that leads to a dead end... Conclusion: next round. SOURCES [1] http://www.rforh.com... [2] http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com... [3] http://creation.com... [4] http://my.firedoglake.com...