BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The worst debate ever

Bruh god ain't real... I walked into a church today, i took a dump in the men's bathroom asked god to turn my dump into a winning lottery ticket... short story breh... 30minutes later I still got crap. BIBLE?! BIBLE?! Breh? really?! You actually believe that crap? I read about Harry Potter in a book, does that mean their is a magical place out there where i can play a ridiculous game on broom sticks? HUH?! HUH!? PRO IM ASKING YOU MANG... Am I gonna get some magic owl fly into my room getting a invite to this school where I will get a red head lackey and a Fine arse chick by my side for 7 years?! I mean its written in a freaking book it must be true! Morality is grounded in god?! Breh don't even start... you trying to tell me this dude right here is the model of morality. Please... Virgin Mary YOU SERIOUS BRUH? VIRGIN MARY? ITS JUST A NUN who gots FREAKY and didnt wanna talk about it, that hoe was probably too scared to admit her daddy issues and came up with this virgin birth crap. Jesus wasn't spewing this sh1t because he the prophet of god... He spewing this sh1t because he's the result of incest mating. Aside from that breh... this is god man he creates all my homies and haters right? What's up with him creating the bubonic plague mang? He has like a reset button on all of us, if he don't like what he sees anymore he kills us off, WTF kind of all loving creator and moral creature is that bruh?! This is the same mofo who invented Hitler a man who refuses to accept the Jews, Saddam who refuses to accept the infedels, and M Night Shamalan a man who will not accept the fact that the Avatar should be a asian based movie. When you create all the bad$$ mofos, create tornadoes and hurricanes in trailer parks for your own sick amusement, yous a sick man. God is a sick man Bruh. God is one conceited arse mofo. Why do i gotta spend my life dick riding and hanging on his nuts in church when i could be spending that time iono feeding the poor or some crap like that. GOD IS OBVIOUSLY not gonna do it. Jesus is just mad that his mama was a hoe if he did at all exist. He's the eminem of the year 1 bruh. UNTIL MY DEUCE TURNS INTO A MONEY, God don't exist bruh. God's will? this mang if he real wouldn't be watching me... he be watching Brooklyn Decker undress night after night like a man. You christians are stupid believe all the sh1ts people tell you. Aye my man... God told me he wants yo nuts for breakfast tomorrow, better cut them off. I can read the bible correctly dude... its true gotta do it... are you REALLY GOING to risk displeasing your boyfriend?! Peace BRUH
The worst debate ever

Please not this is not a real debate. The winner of this debate will be determined by who can give the worst arguments and most amusing arguments for their side. The debate topic is ...........The existence of God I will be Pro and argue for the existence of God Con will argue against the existence of God Opening arguments....................... I thank my heathen unbelieving Godless hell-bound opponent for participating in this debate. Now some people claim that God doesn't exist. The ONLY reason they could claim such a thing, is because they are blinded by the ways of Satan and don't want to be accountable to anyone, probably cause they want to rape children. Now these terrorists loving atheists keep talking about how its not logical to believe in God. Well explain this mr atheist....... 1) The bible is true 2) The bible is the word of God 3) The word of God is true Therefore the bible is true. See this is what these Darwin worshipers, don't get, speaking of Darwin, do you know what these evolutionists think humans came from ? That's right they think that we came from monkeys, I mean have you ever seen a monkey give birth to a human ? of course not, stupid stupid atheists. Let me tell you according to GODS word, not infallible mans word where humans came from. Humans came from God created about 6000 years ago, who were put in a garden and were tempted to eat forbidden fruit from a talking serpent. THATS the real history of humanity friends. Now you see morality is grounded in God, if we don't believe in God ya know what will happen ? Everyone will be murdering and rapeing each other that's what will happen. Let me tell you something about miracles, I once heard from some guy, that his friends saw some dude raise from the dead, of course mr atheist DENIES such PROOF of miracles. What we need to do, is get back to good old christian values that his nation was built on. Like godly morality, family values, denying women the vote, keeping rich people rich and sending blacks to the back of the bus. You wanna know how we can be sure that the USA is Gods special nation, cause we have in god we trust on our money, thats how, take that you commie bastards. Mr atheist questions how I can be sure what is Gods will, well you see I Have these views, then the holy spirit testifies to me with an inner conviction that these views are true, see mr atheist can't understand the ways of God. It is more important now than ever we get back to our christian roots, we live in changing and dangerous time, there is war, and terrorists, the concentration of media and the politics being beholden to who has the most money, sickness and disease and poverty so we must focus our energies on the issues that matter most which are..... GAYS GUNS ABORTIONS Thank you.
IPhone VS Android

I'm sorry to see the forfeiture, my opponent still has one more round left, still, please Extend all arguments made, and i will proceed to add more arguments as stated in the last round. 1. Iphones have two Costs, One for an 16 GB and one for a 32 GB Iphone, each pricey by itself (not to mention the 2 year mandatory contract) The Android market is so vast, for every Android out their you could make an entire mall out of pure Cell Phone shops, that only sell Droids. Each and every Android is unique in it's own way. Picture it like this, A) The Iphone Ice Cream Shop sells 2 flavors, Strawberry, and Vanilla. (Black and White) One scoop is $200 (WHAT?!) (16GB) and Two Scoops are $299 (WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?!) (32GB) The only reason people go here for insanely limited and outrageously priced ice cream is because it's been here for a long time. B) The Droid Ice Cream Shop (Just opened up!) Sells over 10 Flavors! (Over 10 colors) One Scoop is Free (Check 2 year contracts for Virgin Mobile and other small service providers) two Scoops is only $50 But then, it also offers a supercharged 3 Scoops for $100 But then, the granddaddy of them all, the 4 Scooper, for $150!! (When i say scoops, i mean Boatloads of ice cream at the Droid Ice Cream Shop) Now, would you like sprinkles with that? 2. Android can Run Multiple Apps at the Same Time Starting with version 1.0, Android has been able to run multiple applications at the same time regardless of whether they are system apps or apps from the Android Marketplace. The current version of iPhone OS does offer limited multitasking, but only allows native applications such as Mail, iPod and Phone to run in the background. Android users benefit greatly from this discrepancy, as they can receive notifications, listen to music, or even record GPS data without keeping the application open. Apple will try to level the playing field with iPhone OS 4, granting developers access to a small and limiting list of APIs that can run certain services in the background, but it's a long way from the true multitasking that Android has. 3. Android Keeps Information Visible on Your Home Screen One of the key features Android has is a customizable home screen keeps active widgets right at your fingertips, always accesible and always visible - without having to launch an application first. There are widgets for just about every app in the Android Marketplace from playing music to checking the weather and keeping up to date on Facebook. Meanwhile iPhone users are force to flip through their app list to locate and launch each app. If you wanted to check the forecast, for example, you would have to find the app, launch it, and then wait for it to load. With Android, all of that information can be displayed directly on your home screen, never more than a finger swipe away.
IPhone VS Android

Apple Iphone is a far better software than any android out on the market. The facts to prove this entails; Apple is the sole provider of the IPhone, whereas the android market is flooded with multiple carriers who have a different say in the software. The Iphone is much more user friendly; due to many suppliers for the android software, each phone is developed differently in operating per provider. The reliability of the IPhone shatters any credibility to any Android operator because of many software issues that come up on a day to day basis with them
The United States Is The Most Powerful Country on Earth

Saying "President Roosevelt didn't wait" for us to "get back on our feet" doesn't really convince a superb military. It never states anywhere, with a link to our "greatest military. " It only spoke of his reckless behavior as President of the United States. There has been no supplied reason to how it's the best. My opponent never posted the author of the quote, but the GFP is fairly given. However, the top-10-list. org does share false statements. It claims the U. S. A. is a democracy. .. however, the "Pledge to the Flag," seems to speak of the United States being a Republic. Thomas Jefferson even spoke against it: "A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine. " And for clarity for the voters, I was referring to the Oil Spill. As for my opponent's question, I've lived in the United States all my life. I've seen the checks, yet, how are they still getting in undetected? I just find that amusing, Can't we, the most powerful country, prevent near-detonations. Recall 9-11. So yes, you can call them successful. And to my opponent, I must bring up searching imports, for say, people trying to smuggle bombs? Perhaps, even that would make us more safer. And this brings up the military! If we have a far greater military than enemy countries, why haven't we won our ongoing wars already? ! I urge a vote on the Con Side for the following reasons: - U. S. A. isn't even the longest going Country (Great Britain has even been around longer) - U. S. A. hasn't displayed having a greater military than others; we still many year-long wars ongoing. If we had the greatest military, we'd win already. - We'd not been through as much as other countries. The Japanese were nuked: twice. Both by our own U. S. A. The country of Great Britain had a lengthy Revolution, where power changed many times. Middle Eastern Countries lost thousands during the Genocide caused by Hitler, and many more from the Genocide in Darfur. Thus, I urge a vote for my case. W4331c4air 16 New Jersey
The United States Is The Most Powerful Country on Earth

When you mentioned that we get "aide" from other allied countries, you are correct. However, people make it sound like they give us a lot more than they really do. And the reason we were getting any support from our allies in Europe is because they know they owe us from WWI, WWII, and other cases like that. In WWI, we were just trying to get our country running in the correct way and begin to build a strong economy. Even with our hands full in the states, we knew that we had to lend out our hand to countries in Europe like United Kingdom, France and a few others. In WWII we went out of our way to help United Kingdom, Poland, France, etc. We could have just stayed in Japan and defeat them, but instead we had more brave men get shipped to Europe to help fight of the Nazi's and Hitler's brigade, too. On top of that, we were down 2,403 men that had just died at Pearl Harbor and another 1178 that were wounded. President Roosevelt didn't wait a couple months for us to get back on our feet, he immediately asked congress to declare war on Japan. Therefore, this proves my theory of our superb military. http://www.globalfirepower.com... http://top-10-list.org... "The government had plenty to do with it. It was close to their country, despite being out at sea, and was affecting the western coast. So they should've handled it quickly, instead of letting it drag on for multiple days. We don't even have security now." - TheWheel. ??? The government had plenty to do with what? It appears to me that my opponent is just speaking gibberish in some cases. And my opponent mentioned how our airport security lacks sufficiency... Have you ever been to an airport in the United States? Do you see what they do in security? Sometimes they even frisk you. What else can they possibly do? Make you get naked and then look through all of your clothes and look for weapons? Also how he mentioned a shoe bomber, what else can we really do to prevent that? You take your shoes off and get them examined my the thermal/x-ray machine. What else should they do? Pull apart your shoes and look for a bomb? I don't think so. And also, the commercial airliner attacks you mentioned, we most of them successful? Were any successful? If our security was so bad then these bombings would have occurred, and then we would have made our security even stricter. Time Square bombing was also prevented, and there isn't a security system in Time Square where cars have to be checked for bombs, now is there! As well as the World Wars, we have also helped countries like Israel and Kuwait when they were being invaded our bullied by Saddam Hussein and his little army. We gave them a message and told them to stay out of these other countries or else they were going to have a larger war then the one they were already in (The Gulf War), and that's what we are in today. I enjoyed this debate and I hope the viewers vote for my case. Brendan 14 New York
The United States Is The Most Powerful Country on Earth

First, most of these things have been from getting aide from other countries, and disproves my opponent's theory of being "super-country." And for the things we did ourselves, I don't see how that makes us any greater than other countries. Britain was around much longer than us, seeing as separated from it to form this country. So, they would be considered a more powerful country than us, in terms of length. They also suffered through the revolution, and were victorious in surviving through it. Next, to start - I need a name for that author, otherwise, it's considered lies. The government had plenty to do with it. It was close to their country, despite being out at sea, and was affecting the western coast. So they should've handled it quickly, instead of letting it drag on for multiple days. We don't even have security now. Even AFTER nine-eleven, a shoe bomber almost blew up a plane in 2003, followed by many other commercial-flight attacks. There's even the incident from last December 25th, where a Nigerian man attempted to ignite an explosive device, but failed to fully detonate. We seem to be lacking a sufficient amount of security.
The United States Is The Most Powerful Country on Earth

And look forward to a well down 3 rounds of debating. To start out, when I posted the topic I did not mean to come off as cocky or a "show-off". We are the most powerful country and have been the most powerful country since the American Revolution. We have defiantly had our bad times as well: The civil war, Great Depression, etc. However, what i feel makes us so very powerful is our power to overcome things likes these. At the end of the civil war we lost a lot of americans, but also slavery had been made illegal. After the Great Depression we came out of there with more knowledge about how important of a part our economy was for our country. Back in the 18th Century, a French author had predicted that the strongest 2 countries would have been The USA and Russia. He was right and I feel that the proof is around us right not. I don't like bringing things like the oil spill into the picture because the government had nothing to do with that. BP tried cleaning it up and Obama gave them a hand. Yes, this oil spill will effect the economy but as I mentioned before, we have overcome worse. And as my opponent mentioned 9/11, could we had been a little more prepared? Honestly we could do much more. We knew that Al Qaeda was talking about an attack but we didn't know whether they were bluffing and if they weren't then what type of attack and where. Terrorist attack through commercial aircraft was very rare at the time of 9/11 so i personally don't think we couldn't have done TOO much more. I plan on saving the argument about our military for round 3.
The United States Is The Most Powerful Country on Earth

I, as my opponent, look forward to an excellent debate. Now, for my case: 1- We have had not shown many big accomplishments. We're STILL fighting the war in the Middle East, so we cannot be a "super-country," as the opponent states. We may have put an end to the Genocide done by Hitler, however, that came short, as we decided to help late. We haven't done much in the past months to stop the Oil Spill. It raged for many weeks, and I doubt stopping it in July, when it started in March, seems like a big accomplishment. 2- A Super-Country is likely to be nearly impossible to break. However, people are doing it all the time. Back, years ago, terrorists snuck into the U.S., and had smuggled bombs to cause the damage that occurred on what we called "9/11." I don't really see how that happening proves we're "super." It only appears to prove we're far from the most powerful. 3- Our law and order system is far from making us the most powerful country, or perhaps too much of it is meant to keep us that powerful? When we do jury duty, the right of "freedom," to express ourselves, is taken away. We HAVE to follow the law. How does this make us powerful? It's not for us, it's for the government, so how does leaving us without freedom make our country the best? 4- The U.S.A. hasn't been around long, approximately two centuries at the most, including the beginning of the 21st Century. What's good being around long, if we've almost been destroied many times? The stock market crashing crippled thousands of people, and made them lose jobs. The 9-11 incident caused hundreds of families their loved ones, and several buildings were caught aflame. And what good is lasting this long if we're helpless, despite this "most powerful military," to recall the attempted bombing last december. As such, I urge a vote on the neg side.
The Bible is immoral.

The core argument, regarding the morality of the Bible, depends entirely upon the objectivity of the Bible. In this sense, this debate is an attempt to prove, or disprove in your case, the objectivity of the Bible. The Bible is absolutely an objective source of morality for those who are faithful to the Bible and Christianity. They believe it to be true with an equivalent conviction to those who do not believe it to be true. Both believers and non-believers are seeking the same end-game with opposite results. They are both seeking objectivity, with the believers claiming the teachings of Christ are objective, and the non-believers claiming the teachings of science are objective (psychology/philosophy for the purposes of morality). In other words, it really doesn't matter what the Bible SAYS, or what science SAYS about morality. What matters is that whatever is said, can be conveyed and accepted objectively. Science says that science is objective, based on the rules of science. The Bible says that the Bible is objective, based on the word of God. Of the two studies (Christianity and Science), only Christianity claims to draw its source of knowledge from God. Since I believe (on faith) that the Bible is the word of God, and that God is the most pure source of knowledge and creation, I therefore believe that the Bible's word, God's word, is the more objective word. I admittedly accept this claim on faith. I can't prove that God wrote the Bible. I BELIEVE that his Son's teachings helped construct the Bible. The votes on this debate will be entirely dependent on the amount of people who share my faith in the Bible's source, and objectivity. I won't pretend to prove it's objectivity, just as I hope you don't attempt to prove yours. It's simply a matter of which study, Christianity or Science, do we choose to be faithful to. (although there are certain facts that can validate historic events in the Bible, just as there are recent findings that can confirm certain laws and theories of Science)
Gay Marriage is wrong

Okay, well I was hoping to debate someone who didn't agree, but in this case give your reasons for why YOU, PERSONALLY think it's wrong!! Here are mine: 1 Same-sex attraction is a temptation only distributed by the Devil. You fall into that trap and things go wrong, such as (A) where do they get kids, and (B) their lives are changed sexually. 2 Fact: Gay people can sue people who outwardly proclaim their religion. 3 The children or gays and lesbians are completely vulnerable with not knowing which parents they came from. Boys with lesbian parents don't have the needs that a father contributes, vice versa with girls and gay parents. 4 The legalization of gay marriage will change the definition of the word 'MARRIAGE.' Imagine a wedding where they say "I now pronounce you man and...man; husband and...husband." It doesn't work. 5 The definition of "love" will also be changed, as sex outside of marriage will happen and many different things will happen due to same sexes marrying. Next round will include more details!
illegal immigration and outsourcing: practically similar

it's ironic some of the conservatives who push keeping foreigners out, yet want outsourcing to go next to unhindered. now, foreginers are often not able to talk english and wouldn't be able to contribute but would be on the welfare etc. but, that's a very minor phenomenon as most have jobs etc. plus, if your reasons are for protecting about that stuff, what about those who are intelligent and smart, why can't they just come as they wish and not jump through years of hoops? the real reason, it seems, that we don't want them, is because their mass numbers would dillute our economy. people would be willing to work for beans, and so that's what employers would pay. the citizens of the US naturally would not be able to partake of its natural bounty, because the infinite labor that would enter would force very poor working conditions. so, on the one hand many conservatives are against that, but then go and push outsourcing without restriction, which means that in effect, that infinte labor will for many purposes, push us to making beans. (granted there are some jobs that are not cost effective to put overseas, but very many if not most simply require a brain and internet or phone etc) so to be consistent you'd be against foreigners comming here, and outsourcing lassiz faire.
illegal immigration and outsourcing: practically similar

http://money.cnn.com... That link is to a 2004 CNN study that found that outsourcing helps net tens of thousands of jobs because it decreases inflation and interest rates which create greater consumer spending and causing companies to take on extra positions. The study also says that GDP and wages increase as a result of outsourcing. That's just the first thing that came up on google, I'm sure there are even better studies and clearer explanations of the theory behind it if you care to take the time to look. As I stated earlier this obviously can't happen as a result of illegal immigration because the increased tax burden on the average citizen cancels the benefits. Thus the two are not the least bit similar as one is an effective tool for economic growth and the other creates recession and safety concerns.