Atheism is Logically Flawed.

You are exactly correct on many things in your statements, however do you not see the very fact that using the critical thinking that you yourself posted does not work with atheism? CLARITY: Could you elaborate further on that point? Could you express that point in another way? Could you give me an illustration? Could you give me an example? Atheist says there is no God. Can you elaborate on that, or show me a model of how that would work with no creator? ACCURACY: Is that really true? How could we check that? How could we find out if that is true? By showing the math of the Big Bang or whatever you so desired can that disprove a God? Or simply prove how he did it? PRECISION: Could you give more details? Could you be more specific? Can an Atheist give more precise details on how existence is logically possible without a God? RELEVANCE: How is that connected to the question? How does that bear on the issue? Is what your proving truly pertaining whether there is a God or not? Or is it merely a guess of a method? DEPTH: How does your answer address the complexities in the question? How are you taking into account the problems in the question? Is that dealing with the most significant factors? Any answer that I have been given from you do not go into depth not do they directly answer. BREADTH: Do we need to consider another point of view? Is there another way to look at this question? What would this look like from a conservative standpoint? What would this look like from the point of view of . . .? The view point that there is no logical reason of a God that I hear from you time and time again is not taking into consideration the actual facts that are out there. LOGIC: Does this really make sense? Does that follow from what you said? How does that follow? But before you implied this, and now you are saying that; how can both be true? As we have already discussed, Atheism is shown to be illogical according to its own facts. I showed you two simply basic laws we all know, Conversation of mass and energy as well as the fact that physics applies everywhere. However this is a contradiction as it would mean no where is it possible for anything to be created under any circumstance. Then how did we come to be? FAIRNESS: Do I have a vested interest in this issue? Am I sympathetically representing the viewpoints of others? This may be the only thing Atheism and you have cleared. The fact that you are interested. Now for God and using critical thinking. Clarity: There are two ways to look at it, either God doesn't follow our physics which would be as illogical as to us as our own laws of physics or God is within everything and is everything. Maybe there is a base factor within us all that is the intelligent creator. For a model I could create something using my intelligence like anyone else can. However Atheism cannot show how something is invented without intelligence. Accuracy: Yes as we have seen a God is just as likely if not more likely then Atheism. How could we test this? Many things are already testing it, CERN is looking for the God Particle, or you could look somewhere else. Precision: Everything in this world is designed, from your DNA to the Electrons and Protons of every atom, they work as Ones and Zeros like a computer code. Relevance: Yes what I have said does show how a Creator is much more logical and sound while a random event happening that if the moon was a hair breadth smaller we would never have an eclipse of if the Earth spinner any differently then the moon wouldn't stay in orbit. Depth: In fact God can indeed explain every miscalculation in math that is confused on how everything came to be. An creator welcomes many new ways and thoughts rather then the dead end of nothingness. Breadth: Do I need to consider other view points? I am and have. However every views eventually leads to the fact of a Creator. Logic: Yes a God is logical, in fact what is illogical about things that are obviously well designed being built by something intelligent? It would be crazy to believe it's all random. Fairness: Yes I do believe I am by using the same standards as you and having great interest in this. As you can see Atheism does not pass Critical Thinking while Theism does. There are many more views and ways people could answer the questions but I as a normal person answered to the best of my ability. So far I have not see a shred of logic behind Atheism except sheer denial. Where is the proof of God? Everywhere my friend. Everywhere. Why is Earth the only Planet out of 300 Sextillion that we have seen to support life? If it was random it should have a percentage or rate at which life bearing planets form. However that is not seen, but if it was in the future, how would it disprove God? Also if you follow seeing is believing then God is more seen rather than the lack of. However as I said nothing can disprove a God and by Science, if it isn't disproven then it is true.