Modern science is too primitive to validly discount unexplainable supernatural phenomena.

I will offer my take on his viewpoints. ". .. True, we do not know where it directly comes from, but that is not due to the current science, just the lack of time and energy that has already been put into it. .. . "Again, I am not debating whether science will discover the answers to these unknowns in the future. I suppose the answers will be known eventually. Where there is a will, there is a way. Yet, gravity has been a part of modern science since Newton. If modern science could explain where gravity comes from, it would have. ". .. Humans need sleep to refresh the mind, and to build up energy. .. "As the mind remains active when people sleep, I do not think it is to refresh the mind. The body does lose suffer from some amount of fatigue during periods of sleep deprivation. However, not everyone requires the same amount of sleep to feel refreshed. The record for any person going without sleep is 11 days. On the eleventh day, he is quoted as saying, "I do not feel tired yet. There is a bit of adrenaline pumping around". [1]". .. Miracles are a term for an event that is defined by religion. Therefore I don't count them as supernatural, and they should not be defined by science. .. "This is not completely true. A miracle is defined as:mirace - n.1. an effect or extraordinary event in the physical world that surpasses all known human or natural powers and is ascribed to a supernatural cause. [2]One does not have to believe in God or have a religion to acknowledge a miracle. They would only have to acknowledge that an occurence surpasses known human capabilities and the known forces of nature. I say known because science cannot claim to understand or explain all human ability or natural events. God,by some, is defined as a Spirit. spirit - n.1. the principle of conscious life; the vital principle in humans, animating the body or mediating between body and soul. 2. the incorporeal part of humans3. the soul regarded as separating from the body at death.4. conscious, incorporeal being, as opposed to matter 16. an individual as characterized by a given attitude, disposition, character, action, etc17. the dominant tendency or character of anything [3]This brings us to another concept unknown to science. Where do people get their character or spirit? We are clearly born with it, as children display different characters from infancy. If spirit or character did not exist, then everyone would behave the same. Yes, nurture or nature affects this character, yet, these influences attempt to foster (or curb) traits that are already present. If this character were a result of biology, wouldn't twins behave exactly the same? Science does not acknowledge the existence of God or spirit because they cannot be seen with the naked eye or touched physically. We do not see or touch air yet we know it exists. For this reason, I assert that science is too primitive to validly discount such matters - or the lack of matter as unreal phenomena. I await Con's response . http://science.howstuffworks.com... [1]. http://dictionary.reference.com... [2]. http://dictionary.reference.com... [3]