Military conscription is unjust.

First of all I would like to address the fact that my opponent failed to post her argument in time on the debate.org site. You had three days to come up with an argument, you decide to wait until the last minute and then post your argument on facebook. As far as debate.org goes the round was forfeited and judges should treat it as such. Their is no way that we should buy the fact that it wouldnt let her post her argument and if it did it is because the time limit had been surpassed and the round forfeited. Judges, I am not going to run a huge theory argument on why this is bad but I ask that you take into consideration the fact that the Lwerd forfeited RD2. Value Criterion- This is an ld debate tournament. It is not enough to simply say I don't know. If you don't know the specifics of ld debate then you shouldn't have entered this tournament. It's not difficult to figure out what ld debate is. If my opponent would have cared at all about debating correctly, she could have simply read a wikipedia article which would have solved this whole problem. Also, it doesn't matter how other judges vote. This is one round and I am making an argument that the con of the other debates could also make. Different judges judge different ways and there is no way to implement a universal type of judging. Thus, I ask you not to look at the stuff outside of this round. The Lwerd had no standard during the AC and thus we must use my standard. The fact that the LWERD forfeited the second round should also be looked at. Now I will rebute the actual case. Rights 1.I am arguing that if an army-less country is attacked more people would die than if we used some citizens to form a military and essentially win the war. 2. They might not want to fight, but it is necessary for the nations freeddom. Because the people live in the nation, they have an obligation to that nation. 3.This point is essentially the same as the last. I am arguing that the fighting is necessary. As people living in the nation, the people have an obligation to protect their nation. By moving to the nation, the people concede to the possibility to the draft. (social contract) 4. Government can take steps possible to make sure well bodied people are drafted. Cost 1.If we drafted a small number of well-bodied people then the small military would be effective. Social Impact- Im saying that in certain situations where life is being threatened people would be accepting of military conscription. Value/Criterion- Lwerd doesn't tell why her definition is preverable thus you use mine because mine was offered first and the lwerd doesnt say why its bad. We give more people their due because more lives are protected. My opponents response to my criterion is saying its the same as my value. Protection of innocents is a way of reaching my value, its in no way the same. The lwerd still gives criterion thus we use mine. My Case- No response to stadards- EXTEND A strong army may result in a win. Meaning that conscription protects more. Even if my opponent wins every argument, she has not linked to my c/v and has not provided a criterion of her own meaning I still win. My opponent has failed to meet ld standards/ forfeited a round/ and has no way to win this round.