The bible is immoral

Ok, taking your post one piece at a time, you are making a three point claim that your points are true if you have these three things: 1) Looking at the verses you posted. 2) Looking at the videos you posted. 3) If you have a moral compass. Now, I would argue that this further makes the Biblical accounts more subjective to the reader simply because you have only pulled, what you perceive as immoral, from the text. You have ignored my question and rebuttal to what one does with the texts that speak of love, directly saying the word "love", what do you do with these text is what you claim is "100%" true? So in effect, you've made a claim that's built on a a false dilemma fallacy, you say that the Bible is entirely immoral, pulling only from certain verses and ignoring the rest, and this is created by your first two qualifiers. (I did look at the verses, because in no way have you acknowledged the verses about love, care, kindness, etc. but only what you see as immoral) The verses you quote and the videos that you link to are the same, they share the same sort of cherry picking that a fundamentalist Christian would use to defend the Bible, both of which are poorly founded arguments. The third qualifier for it being objective is that one must have a moral compass and morality, in any sense, is subjective and based on the individual; there is no collectively correct moral compass or else debates on such topics would not exist. So, You make a black/white comparison and lace it with ad hominems and are in fact ignoring my rebuttals to your own points. This ignoring of my claims and restating your own creates the hypocrisy that I stated in a previous post. Secondly, my goal is not to circumvent these things and if you want me to give you a rationale as to why those things listed are not immoral, I'm not going to do that, because it's not so simply and effectively done unless you are intellectually lazy or if you have a strong agenda going one way. If one is to make sense of the Bible, or any text, recognizing the context is important. Concerning the Bible, specifically, most scholars know when to detach God from the humanity of the text and what I mean by that is that we do not apply to God from the context of the historical time period. So, rationalizing the events of the Bible only do so much and we must know when the writer's biases come into play and when they do not. It is much more complex than one would imagine, on a surface level, and that is theological debate that is for another forum, it doesn't belong here. But, "Dossier of Reason" is quite reductionist and speaks from an anti-theistic perspective, so it's not effective in forming a logical and coherent opinion about the Bible's morality since it is so one-sided. I would say that it's a place to start, but one must look at both extremes, and then some, before culminating a mature and original opinion of the morality of the Bible, as well as anything in life. So, after a long winded explanation, circumventing these things, or rationalizing them, is not the goal, but recognizing that it is in the text and delving deeper into the meaning of the text. But again, you end the paragraph with ad hominems and you ignore me, lashing out like I stated before. When cornered, and your information is found wanting, you resort to insults and it's off-putting for a debate. You make yourself look like a fool who only adopts opinions of others, lacking the individuality to form your own. I'm not asking you to "prove" that the god of the Bible is immoral, but after instigating a debate with the claim, "the bible is immoral" and making so many claims that, "you are as completely immoral as your god," you'd think that there would be a substantiated claim that the Bible is immoral as well as the god of the Bible. All you've done is regurgitate what others say (i.e. the videos and the verses) and peppered it with insults to those that disagree, so you've not "100% proved" that the Bible is immoral. So, this is my response to your last couple of sentences: Next time, please don't resort to insults, because it makes you look silly and ignorant of what you claim, which you have not defended with your own rationale, but you've done a great job of plugging authors and I would argue that you have conducted a sort of plagiarism with it, plagiarism with poor grammar and terrible insults at that. So, what has culminated is that you posited a copy and paste of verses from the Bible, that you've cherry picked, and snippets from the "Dossier of Reason" without your own, individual substance. I responded in whole to your initial debate; going bullet by bullet wouldn't have worked since there is not enough space to respond accordingly, so my response was indeed sufficient in refuting your claim. You responded by saying that I didn't address it and I don't know how you didn't see the connection to your initial claim; you throw a sort of tantrum about me not picking apart these verses and the videos, but in reality, it is not possible to exegete all the verses, or even one alone that you've presented, in this limited space. I responded in a more point by point basis, responding to each paragraph at a time, and you still do not think I'm addressing your claim; stating that you think I'm dancing around it and using a non-sequitur like, "So I know that you are as completely immoral as your god." I refute your claim and say that the Bible is not moral, but is not immoral either. (Also, I don't know what you mean by, "so no more playing your prostitution", it doesn't make much sense and it seems like another nonsensical insult meant to try and reduce my argument instead of actually respond to it.) That is my claim, and you can continue threatening to not respond, but it is evident that this discussion is important enough to you that you continue to debate. You're not an umpire and you're not the ruler of the debate forums, and continuing to speak as such, with such supposed authority, and continuing to attacking your opponent, you are making yourself look worse than you already do through your debate. I apologize if that's harsh, but you argue like a political commentator and it's quite the opposite of a debate, but more of a, colloquial, "pissing contest." Instead of responding out of hurt and confusion, lashing out with insults and claims of knowledge, use that knowledge and show someone how intelligent you are. Don't just repeat a book or a video, but use your own reasoning and recognize that the world is diverse and that not everyone has the same opinion or moral compass as you, and that's alright. Use this knowledge that you claim you have. Do better.