Jesus is God

Everyone knows the three laws of Logic - The Laws of Identity, Non-Contradiction, and Excluded Middle.I know all of it too and I totally agree with all of these. So, lets first identify God and Jesus. God - Creator; Independent; Subordinate to No-one; All-Knowing; To Whom everything belongs; The only One who exempt from death (as Bible says only Immortal).Jesus - Creation of God, Dependent on gravity, air, food, water; Subordinate to God, prays to God, asks for help; Ignorant; Nothing belongs to Jesus; And also not exempt from death.Using brain and Law of non-contradiction we can say Jesus is not God. But some people stupid, and they will bring up some verses and misinterpret it in order to try to prove their point (if they have a point).Using only both the brain and the Law of non-contradiction do not suffice because the whole context of the Scriptures must also be used. My opponent only listed the human qualities of Jesus Christ and that is incomplete information about Jesus because the Bible also listed the divine qualities of Jesus Christ: Eternal ( John 1:1,14,18, 3:16,18, 1 John 1:1-3, 4:19), Immortal (1 Timothy 6:15-16--> Revelation 17:4. 19:16, Acts 9:3-9), Independent existence ( John 5:26), Equal to God in nature ( John 5:18, Philippians 2:6, Exodus 3:14--> Matthew 28:19), One with the Father in nature (John 10:28-30 --> Deuteronomy 32:39), Jesus instruct Christians to pray to Him ( Psalm 2:8--> John 14:14), Jesus instructs Christians to baptise not only in the name of the Father but also in the name of the Son ( Matthew 28:19). The paradox of Jesus' God-nature and human-nature is resolved in the Christian doctrine of the incarnation.In fact, this teaching is explicit in the Scriptures and it explains how God loved and saved his people from their sins( John 1:1,14, Hebrews 2:14, 1 Timothy 3:16). John17:1-3 proves nothing, because it says "...You (God) have given Him (Jesus) authority...." and it proves that Jesus cannot be God, because God cannot be given authority, because God has the All-Authority there to have. These verses shows that Jesus has a boss, but God cannot have a boss.The argument of my opponent assumes Unitarian Christology but the text in question does not necessitate it and in fact, it causes great tension and contradictions when it is forced into the text. John 17:2 only speaks of God giving his Son "authority" not "ability." Jesus has innate ability and he is under the Father's authority. These both is natural for him because he is the Son.In High Christology, this means that Jesus is simultaneously functionally subordinate to God and ontologically equal to him. John10:28-30 is misinterpreted by Pro, because after Jesus said "I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE." Jews pick up the stones to stone him, and Jesus asked them, "I have shown you many good works from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?" and Jews said, we don't stone you for good works, but for blasphemy, showing that Jews understood same thing as Pro today, but Jesus said, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods" ' " - showing them they misunderstood him, because if you interpret "I and my Father are one" to mean Jesus claims to be god, then all Jews were called gods by God, so you should interpret it in same way, and worship Jews.But Jesus also says (or rather prays to God) make disciples one with us, therefore disciples are also gods.My opponent did not consider the context of the text in question. He held onto the defense of Christ in vain for the very words of the Savior spoke of his true godhood by his sonship.Con took this for granted. Here's the context of John 10:30: John 10:28-30 — I GIVE THEM ETERNAL LIFE, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of MY HAND. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my FATHER’S HAND. I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE.” Deuteronomy 32:39 — 'See now that I, I am He, AND THERE IS NO GOD BESIDES ME; It is I who put to death and GIVE LIFE. I have wounded and it is I who heal, And there is no one who can deliver from MY HAND. John 10:31-Jesus asked if his good deeds were the reason for his death penalty ( Note that Jesus already knows the answer to his question. He only asked it to reveal his nature by his identity through his works - John 10:25).John 10:32-The Jews said no. John 10:33-Rather, the Jews said that it is because Jesus, who "being a human" ( Greek: on anthropon)makes himself "God" ( Greek: theos). John 10:34-38 Jesus' defense of his claim in John 10:28-30, 33 using a twofold rebuttal: 1) Godship- If humans can be called "gods" by reason of a God-given authority then how much more proper and good the Son be called "God" if he is truly such by his very nature? Jesus made this argument from a solid basis, the Scriptures per-se ( Psalm 82:6-7).2) Sonship- The reason of Jesus' sonship is his godship. Jesus is God [ by nature] because he is the Son of God [ the Father].This recalls his words in John 10:28-30 which made the Jews desirous to kill Jesus.The words of Jesus " I in the Father vise versa" and "I and the Father are one" speaks of a "unity" and based on both the immediate context and the greater context it is unity in nature ( John 10:28-30, Deuteronomy 32:39).And also, giving life to death, go read OT, OT prophets gave life to death also.... Notice the texts: John 10:28-30 — I GIVE THEM ETERNAL LIFE, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of MY HAND. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my FATHER’S HAND. I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE.”Deuteronomy 32:39 — 'See now that I, I am He, AND THERE IS NO GOD BESIDES ME; It is I who put to death and GIVE LIFE. I have wounded and it is I who heal, And there is no one who can deliver from MY HAND.It is clear in the greater context of John 10:28-30 that Jesus is not equating himself with the OT prophets in terms of giving life but rather, he is equating himself with the OT God in terms not only of giving life but also of preserving it.