Drinking, sex before marriage, and drugs is a moral issue and engaging in them is immoral

To rebut the statement claimed by the pro, I will just go through each one of her claims, and discuss my opinion on the matter. For her first comment, she explains that she cannot provide a definition for the word that she used previously in this debate. Therefore, all consideration of definitions shall go to the pro side. Second, she states that "you do not have to decide if something is moral or immoral to have an opinion," assuming that I stated that one must decide if something is moral or immoral. However, I merely said "assigned" in regards to this context. A person will always have some sort of subconscious reaction to any sort of thing that affects them (and technically, everything affects them in some way), thus they do not decide consciously themselves, but rather their own instinct, or subconscious, if you will, does it for them (Freudian Theory). Therefore, each and every action that occurs on a person technically gets assigned with some moral judgment, whether the person consciously knows it or not. Third, what I'm basically arguing is the idea of the Butterfly Effect in regards to our current actions affecting future actions (Multiple researches explain this). If I do one action now, even if it is indirect, it will have SOME sort of impact on the future, no matter how small. Therefore, yes, perhaps Harold will flirt with Jane whether or not he's inebriated, but the fact of the matter is, his previous decision did impact his future action in some way, in that he was loaded with liquid confidence, or he went high and dry into flirting with her. And subsequently, Harold will probably make a load of other decisions that will probably result from his previous decision. Fourth, in regards to your banana-London argument, even though it may seem minuscule, the eating of the banana did play some part in your decision. Even though this is not the only argument I can use against this, if you want to talk about possibilities, then try this on for example: Jane has had a very low potassium level throughout her life. She's been hospitalized a few times for it in the past, but it hasn't been too troublesome or dangerous. She is now in her senior year of high school and is making a decision on universities. The deadline to turn in her application for her dream college, located in London, is set on Wednesday. She realizes that all of the scholarships that she had accrued are only good if she goes to college the following year, no later, and she wants to have access to them, so she must go to college next year. Thus, she plans on filling out the application, and sending it in on the very same day, which will be on Tuesday. When she wakes up that Tuesday, she feels a bit woozy, but she doesn't really consider it to be that much. She looks at the banana, and ponders eating it or not. But then she thinks to herself, "Nah. I'd better not. I should start on the application. " She then starts to fill out the application. She finishes the application, puts it in her backpack, and she heads out the door. Not even 10 feet in walking out the door, she collapses, and her neighbor notices this and calls the paramedics who then bring her to the hospital. She goes unconscious for two days, and the doctors diagnose that her potassium level was very bad, which is why she fainted, and if she even ate one single banana, she would have been fine for a few days. The day is now Thursday, and Jane has now lost her chance of going to that particular school in London because she didn't eat that one single banana, and she subsequently chooses an American school, because no other schools in London took her fancy. That entire story demonstrates that something as small as a banana can affect something another action in that deciding to go to a London school. If you argue that this example is highly improbable, and should not be considered, then I would like you to allow the argument of possibility vs. probability to go to me. If you agree that this story is valid in this debate, then I would like you to allow the argument that small minuscule things such as eating a banana does make an impact on other things like making a decision for going to a London school to go to me.