terrorism of non muslims

I am going to refute your points first and then proceed to expand on my arguments. I will include some of your quotes and give my responses. "there is not much to discuss, my argument is simply true.. so undefeatable" Over the course of this debate I am confident your argument will be defeated. "becuase allah is the spirit of terrror.. death fear, the threat of pain or death by islam, as their laws or punishment, essentially altering human nature or morality.." "islam is red glowing racism and terrorism.. the most pure form of hatred against humanity that can possibly exist.. it can not be imagined to be worse" You have made some extreme generalizations about Islam without any evidence. According to Pew Research there are 1.6 billion muslims in the world. You believe all of them practice a religion of pure hatred? The majority of muslims are against terrorism and are certainly not religious extremists. Most of those who believe in Islam are normal people. Pew says: "Recent surveys show that most people in several countries with significant Muslim populations have an unfavorable view of ISIS, including virtually all respondents in Lebanon and 94% in Jordan. Relatively small shares say they see ISIS favorably." Also: "In many cases, people in countries with large Muslim populations are as concerned as Western nations about the threat of Islamic extremism, and have become increasingly concerned in recent years. About two-thirds of people in Nigeria (68%) and Lebanon (67%) said earlier this year they are very concerned about Islamic extremism in their country..." There are numerous quotes from the Quran promoting peace such as: "There is no compulsion where the religion is concerned." (Holy Quran: 2/ 256) (from good news network). I can provide more if you like since there are countless morally correct quotes found in the religious book of Islam. I am not saying that all muslims are peaceful, but I have successfully countered your assertions that Islam is completely evil. You said: "so you would let yourself be tortured and killed, instead of doing the terror, honorable.. but not necessary according to morality or survival, as the lack of existence of survival negates pain and death.. and thus morality" I may be referencing what you said in this quote during my own arguments. My Case/Arguments Argument 1: The terrorist is dishonest. If a terrorist is forcing you to do an act of terrorism under threat of torture or murder then you can reasonably conclude the terrorist is either evil or insane. At the very least you know the terrorist doesn"t follow what we would consider a good moral code. If the terrorist is evil then the terrorist cannot be trusted. This is because most terrorists have no problem with lying to their victims. How do you know the terrorist won"t force you to murder someone and then kill you afterwards. The most likely scenario is you doing the act of terror and the terrorist killing you afterwards. Essentially you would kill an innocent person (or multiple innocent people) for nothing. Argument 2: Acts of terrorism are not moral. Acts of terrorism are horrific and can cause the deaths of countless innocent civilians. Take the examples of 911, Paris, Nice, and Orlando. Look at the evil that ISIL is doing. When you are murdering innocent people or doing other evil acts of terror you are behaving opposite to any reasonable moral code. You are being immoral by doing so. Argument 3: You cannot go along with the terrorist By going along with the terrorist you are going to embolden the terrorist to commit more acts of terror. After their success with you they will feel confident to keep doing evil. The only moral option is to say no and to fight back. If you fight back you have the chance of eliminating the terrorist and not only saving your own life but saving the lives of people in the future. Instead of letting the terrorist continue to do evil you can get rid of them and stop them from doing terrorism ever again. For these reasons I have demonstrated how doing terrorism at the command of the terrorist is immoral. Also fighting back is the right thing to do and even if you are killed you have still done morally just behavior. Being killed doesn"t take away from the correct moral choice you would have made. Sources: http://www.pewresearch.org... http://www.goodnewsnetwork.org...