BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Social Networking Sites are Harmful

In case you haven't noticed I am in Intermediate, I just had to get into this website for my group and the opposing teams group! We are only just learning about arguments/Debates! Please! I just need to find the other group that I have to debate against, so I might have to drop out of this debate, because I need to or else I will get a bad grade! So thank you for getting my debate and accepting it! (I edited the other argument!)
Rap battle no cry babies allowed!

I don't see why you're trying to rap about your butthole but I'll smack both of your cheeks for free, twofold I'd rap against a pirate and kill it, I was told, But your fantasies are not nearly as bold as what you've sold. Rum is definitely not the answer, I think you're getting meek I can't become your man, that would mean I'm a freak But I'm not, I am truthfully and wholly discreet More than the huge massive warts contained on your feet. Thank goodness you ran away, don't come back again Or else I'll tell the story how I whipped you again, I got the pen To write the tales and your woes in my rap den Worth more bars than the entirety of the Canadian yen. My raps are gold, your tales are cancer enough I'm a man, who works out all day to get buff And I wouldn't want to come up to you and take a snuff Because your like a pile of Jello, baby you're not that tough! I continue rapping on, you really won't be missed Shoot you out of my shotgun, but far enough into the mist I hope you never come back again, or I'll sever your wrist With the double knife I carry, like Wolverine and his fist.
Rap battle no cry babies allowed!

MY ARSE IS PLUMP, IT'S A TOOTY SNOOTY RUMP, CHECKED IT FOR A LUMP, FOUND A TINY BUMP. OHHH! I GOT ARSE CANCER AND RUM IS THE ANSWER! YES RUM IS THE ANSWER! RUM IS THE ANSWER! OHHH! I GOT ARSE CANCER AND RUM IS THE ANSWER! YES RUM IS THE ANSWER TO MY BACK SIDE CANCER! A MUSCLE BOUND BACK-SIDE IT BE! PORKED BY MANY MEN AT SEA! I DON'T CHARGE, MY BUTT HOLE IS FREE! OHHH! I'M A PIRATE WITH ARSE CANCER AND LIFE IS GOOD! AND SEMEN DRENCHES MY BREASTS, LIKE IT SHOULD! BUTT CANCER. A MUTT CALLED PRANCER. A STRUT FOR MY MATE LANCER! THIS IS THE PIRATES LIFE, NOT GOING TO FVCK YOU, NOR BECOME YOU WIFE! YOU'LL JUST HAVE TO WATCH ME FINGER FROM A DISTANCE. DON'T CUMM ANY CLOSER, I DON'T NEED ASSISTANCE. MY NIPPLES ARE HARD, I JUST SQUIRTED A COUPLE YARD NOW MY PVSSY IS SOAKED, BEFORE I SQUIRTED, I CROAKED ARSE CANCER! ARSE CANCER! ARSE CANCER FOR EVERYONE! -She, in her drunken and rather cumm-soaked mess of a state, dances off into the night, never to be seen again, nor for that matter ever to be talked about. This was the last time anyone ever saw Cute Pirate. Indeed she shall be missed-
Rap battle no cry babies allowed!

Missy, you are messing here at the wrong time Take your raps in a compass, because they now arr mine. I will walk the plank miss, but not after I feel How your nudism helps advance your sex appeal! Maybe you feel cute, but you're about to get the boot, Call out my parrots, and make them shout the hoot Cause when my ship advances and leaves yours in the snoot I have already boarded ship and stolen your loot! I'm a top notch rapper, making sure I'm well fed When I spit a bar, sources have me at 100% cred You don't need to rap again, you know that I'll always have led Sit down hun, I'm gonna put some brown on that red. Check my religion, your failure raps I don't condone Trying to downplay me as some sort of traffic cone But when you try to advance on me, you'll be alone Worse than the image of you that shows you've not even grown In the next round, you'll need to fire much more than a booty slap So I'm going to go to sleep now, and take a well-deserved nap.
Rap battle no cry babies allowed!

WALK THE PLANK MY LOVER!SHANK, THEN GANK SPANK THIS LAND LUBBER!SOON WE'LL TURN HIS ARSE HOLE INTO RUBBER!OHHH!CUTLASS IN WANK HAND WITH A CONDOM IN THE OTHER,SAID HE LOVED MY BIG TITS, I MADE SURE TO SMOTHER!SLAP YOUR BELL-END RIGHT AND PUT IT IN ME ARSE HOLEMAKE SURE IT'S TIGHT LIGHT A SNUG LITTLE PARCELMY CAT TOOK A SH-T ON MY LANDING,SMELT LIKE CAT FOOD IT WAS OUTSTANDING!FOR IT'S A PIRATES LIFE FOR ME!AYE!KILLED AN UGLY MAN-SOUL, NAME HIS DEAD BODY MIKE, LOVED HIS LITTLE ARSE HOLE EVEN THOUGH IMA DIKEFOR IT'S A PIRATES LIFE FOR ME!
Human social patterns point to the idea that there is no God

I'll start out by saying that I do not expect to win this. It is a very sensitive topic, and I don't expect to be able to change what you've been taught for years. Even so, I think it will be a very interesting debate, and I really don't care if I win. Secondly, this is not a debate on whether or not you believe there is a God. If you want to debate that, make your own. This is a debate on whether social patterns point suggest that there is or isn't a God. So, on to the argument... If you were to go back in time 500 years, you probably wouldn't be able to find a single person who didn't "know for a fact" that there is a God. As a northwesterner, I see a whole bunch of atheists and agnostics. Maybe, if you live in Alabama, you don't see as many. Sorry. But my point is, the number of atheists is growing. What is the reason for that? As scientific explanations become more thorough and plausible, people start realizing the alternative. A long time ago, there was no theory of evolution. It is human nature to "fill in the blanks." A good example of that is when the Aztecs saw Hernan Cortes for the first time, they had never seen a white person, so they automatically assumed that he was the Sun god. Suffice it to say that it tuned out great for Hernan and not so great for the Aztecs. Another one is that people noticed that the sun and stars moved across the sky, so logically, it made sense that they moved around the earth. It wasn't until the 19th century that the church admitted that maybe it was the earth that moved. However, sometimes humans are lazy. Most likely, the Aztecs didn't all come to the separate conclusion that Hernan was the Sun god. Likely, Greg the Aztec probably said, "hey, I think that that shiny guy is the sun god," (although maybe not quite verbatim) and then Joe the Aztec probably agreed, and it spread. Point being, Fred the Christian probably said something like, "Hey I really like that Jesus guy... I think he might be some sort of deity, or at least his son, he's so amazing! I think I'll write a book about him." Well, someone read Fred's book and liked it, and thought it was a great explanation. The rest is history. I don't want to say too much now, so I can save more for later rounds. I think this can be a great debate, even if I don't have any hope of winning.
We Should Place a Birth Tax on Blacks

Black people do not cause any "trouble," as you put it. They are rational, peaceful human beings, just like us. You are unable to justify your argument that black people have some kind of inward tendency toward violence because that statement is not true by any means. We do not have to charge black people for coming into the world any more than we charge white people- essentially zilch, apart from normal hospital expenses. You are mentally ill. You also claim that the tax will be placed SPECIFICALLY to force black people not to have children. That's a corrupt plot. If they are too poor to pay your outrageous tax, they should not have to get an abortion. They'll just go out and get a live birth without the help of doctors in your twisted totalitarian society. Also, I've never heard of abortion making women happier. I'd assume it makes them pretty sad, since their kid just died, and you never provided any links which say abortion makes women happy. I'm pro abortion, but I do believe it should be an option, not some kind of mandatory population control. I think life is a basic right, it's one of the basic rights outlined in the Constitution of America. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Life is not a privilege. Things which want to live should be allowed to live. Murder and population control are both infringements of basic human rights. If we ever encounter population crises, then birth control pills will be doled out accordingly, but not with different biases to certain races. Life should not only be a privilege to rich people. If a poor person can make a good parent, and can raise a child without much money, then they have the right to have a kid. You are worrying about overpopulation before worrying is needed. We're only at 7 billion right now, and I'm sure there are more practical ways to solve overpopulation than to make birth more expensive to certain people and then raise the price with the malicious intent to prevent those people from reproducing.
We Should Place a Birth Tax on Blacks

Look, frankfurter50, considering the trouble black people cause, we have to place a birth tax on black people. Also, it reduces overpopulation. Since black people are too poor to afford $50K just to have a child, they will get abortions. And do you know that abortion actually makes women happier? Well, it's true, believe it or not. If you believe that life is a basic right, not a privilege, then you are wrong, my friend. Life is a privilege only to powerful and rich people. If a black family can SOMEHOW afford the $50K birth tax for a black baby, then we will charge them $80K. If they can afford $80K, then I guess they can have the child. Also, it is $50K for a child. So if a black woman is pregnant with twins, then the birth tax is $100K.
We Should Place a Birth Tax on Blacks

I don't think any white people have ever eaten white fetuses, because that's considered cannibalism, and cannibalism isn't accepted in modern society. Also, I don't think white and black fetuses could taste very different, considering they're the same species. You have a sick and twisted mind, sir. You really make me sick. I'm glad you've never tasted any black fetuses. I hope you never get near any black people. You say they'll give you lots of energy-what the Hell are you, a vampire? The average black person is by no means taller than a white person, and averages do not accurately represent the individuals in a set of data anyway. Also, that scientific calculation you provided is made up. Gravitational potential energy relates to the amount of potential energy an object has in relation to its height above Earth's surface, not the amount of energy a repulsive white supremacist like yourself gains from eating the fetus of a race which has a taller height on average. You are really twisted, sir. REALLY sick. Please, go get help. PLEASE. Also, black people should not have to pay money for crimes which they did not commit as individuals, because being a member of a certain race does not make you responsible for something a member of that race does. Charging black people for being black would be a grave miscarriage of justice.
We Should Place a Birth Tax on Blacks

You see, my friend, if we place a birth tax on black people (i.e. $50K to give birth to a black child), many black families will no longer have kids, and that will solve overpopulation and global warming substantially. Also, black skin, as you know, is the root of all violence. Therefore, we should place a birth tax of $50K on black people. Many pregnant black women will get abortions, and do you know what white people do with the aborted fetuses? White people eat the aborted black fetuses.
Time travel is possible

Thanks Pro. Time travel - The ability to travel to the future (in an accelerated rate) and past. Possible - Able to be. Pro must demonstrate that both travel to the future and to the past is possible. Demonstrating only one isn’t enough. However Pro hasn’t demonstrated either. He claims there was a test done with two twins, where one went up into space and aged slower than the other twin. This wasn’t an actual test that was performed, it was merely a thought experiment [1]. Nobody has literally done this. Pro states time travel to the past is possible because of quantum mechanics. He never explains how, he just cites quantum mechanics. He claims scientists are trying to create a mini-star which would collapse into a black hole (without citation). I think what he’s getting at is that black holes will cause us to travel back through time (even though this is relativity, not quantum physics [2]), but this isn’t a case for backwards time travel. It would only work for going forwards in time [ibid]. Most scientists agree that you cannot travel into the past [3][4]. Pro has failed to provide evidence of the ability to travel to the past or the future. The Grandfather Paradox A powerful reason for rejecting backwards time travel is the “Grandfather Paradox”. If I were to go back in time, I would be able to kill my grandfather before he had any children. However, if I were to do that, I wouldn’t have been born to go back in time to kill my grandfather. We end up with a contradiction. In order for something to be possible, it mustn’t have a contradiction. For example, we know that it’s impossible for there to be a square-circle, because such a thing is contradictory. Being a square precludes being a circle. Likewise, existing in time precludes going into the past. Ultimacy If we can travel back in time, this would create a contradiction between what it means for time to exist and what it means to travel. If time travel is possible, then the past and future exists. It’s possible to travel to New York, because New York exists. If something doesn’t exist, it cannot be traversed. However, conceding that all states of time exist would be conceding that change is illusionary. For if all events are fixed in time, how can there ever be a state of moving from one spot of time to another? Relativity entails the present is merely a point of reference[5], so there can be no objective point which moves through time and therefore, there can be no change. The problem here is that change is “ultimate” to time travel. The very concept of travel entails moving through a various point to another point. Without change, there can be no travel. This makes “time travel” an oxymoron. In order to travel, you need to have change. But, in order for that to be possible, travel must be ontologically nonexistent. Back to Pro. [1] http://physics.about.com... [2] http://www.astronomycafe.net... [3] http://www.livescience.com... [4] http://www.dailymail.co.uk... [5] http://www.pitt.edu...
Time travel is possible

Time travel is possible, in both forward and backward in time. Technically, people have already gone to the future, as shown in the test where there were two twins, one was sent up in space, the other stayed on earth, and when the older twin came back down, he was now the younger twin. That is the test that proves forward. Backwards is nearly achievable, for scientists are creating a mini-star, which could be collapsed into a mini-black hole, and if you know anything about quantum physics, it is that black hole is strong enough to pull you out of your time stream.
Universal Health care

Your main argument against universal health care is that our taxes in the US are too high. This is quite untrue, here is a chart for you. Australia28.3%16.0%Korea17.3%16.2% Austria47.4%35.5%Luxembourg35.3%12.2% Belgium55.4%40.3%Mexico18.2%18.2% Canada31.6%21.5%Netherlands38.6%29.1% Czech Republic43.8%27.1%New Zealand20.5%14.5% Denmark41.4%29.6%Norway37.3%29.6% Finland44.6%38.4%Poland43.6%42.1% France50.1%41.7%Portugal36.2%26.6% Germany51.8%35.7%Slovak Republic38.3%23.2% Greece38.8%39.2%Spain39.0%33.4% Hungary50.5%39.9%Sweden47.9%42.4% Iceland29.0%11.0%Switzerland29.5%18.6% Ireland25.7%8.1%Turkey42.7%42.7% Italy45.4%35.2%United Kingdom33.5%27.1% Japan27.7%24.9%United States29.1%11.9% Just for reference this chart is from http://moneycentral.msn.com... just so everyone can look it up. I put it on the actually debate post just because if I posted a link no one would ever bother to look. Also the column on the right is taxes on a single individual and on the left it is a family with two children. While some countries do have slightly lower rates than the US we have much lower taxes than most countries. Thus your argument is less than true. I would love to expound on why I believe in Universal Health care more but for the time being I only 1:13 to argue. I don't know if this has anything to do with the new site or not but it is quite annoying.
Universal Health care

The democrats almost all agree on this one topic universal health care. This is not only impractical but not smart. First of all in a country were money is low and we are funding two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were are we going to get the money need for universal health care? Well I know were that is coming from, it is coming from us...the people of the United States. Now to do this we are going to need to raise taxes, but wait aren't we doing that now well the answer is yes. So unless Obama or any other democrats can make money appear from thin air we are going to have raise the taxes on the already high taxes.
I Should Stop Working and Go on Welfare

I accept the above listed rules and round outline. In addition: I would like to note that I am pleased this topic was suggested in the private exchange Kescarte_DeJudica and I have been engaged in, and that he views me as the most suitable opponent for this debate. As we have both agreed, debating the topic of welfare as it specifically relates to one person will provide a unique and refreshing insight into the Pro and Con arguments. Rather than arguing for the collective, we will be arguing for the individual. This debate will not propose what is best for society, but what is best for Kescarte_DeJudica. Naturally, I intend to show that on balance, the detriments to him receiving welfare as opposed to earning an income through employment are greater than any assumed benefits. My arguments will follow in an orderly fashion, and will comprise of clear and well-presented points throughout. I ask that judges keep one primary question in mind whilst voting: who has the strongest arguments and counter-arguments? Similarly to my opponent, I expect this debate to be both entertaining and educational. I look forward to reading his arguments, and I wish him good luck!
I Should Stop Working and Go on Welfare

Welcome everyone to the debate! I am back on DDO, debating again, and am glad to be here after taking a significant amount of time off. I've been looking forward to this debate, and believe I will enjoy it, now that I have time with the school semester drawing to a close. I and my opponent, the esteemed Draka, will be debating on welfare. Specifically, I will be debating that I should stop working and go on welfare. I will attempt to prove to everyone that this is the far better option to the alternative for me, that is, to continue to work. My opponent's (Con's) position will be to create an opposing argument, at his discretion, using whatever reasons or angles he deems appropriate to the topic. We ask that you, the audience, maintain civil discretion at all times. Should you vote on the topic, please maintain objectivity, and vote based on the strength of our respective arguments and position's points, rather than your personal opinion on the topic. Here are the Rules: -All rounds must follow the Round Outline. -A forfeited round constitutes an automatic loss. -Burden of proof is on Pro Round Outline: -Round #1 is for acceptance and opening remarks only. -Round #2 is for making your argument. No rebuttals will be posted in this round. We will make our arguments as a persuasive speech to the audience. -Round #3 is for Rebuttals. Here we will try to refute our opponent's previous argument. Round #4 is for Defense. In this round, we will defend our point against the rebuttals made in the previous round. I very much look forward to this debate. I hope it is entertaining,and educational. Thank you in advance to Draka for participating, the audience for reading, and Debate.org for hosting it.
Recreational Marijuana Should Be Legal

My first point stems off of economic impact. Taxation off of marijuana could bring billions into each state's economy. The legalisation of this substance would also make many different medical disorders easier to treat without a prescription, reducing the cost of the everyday person, and decreasing corporate profits. This would consequently result in lower healthcare costs. (. http://taxfoundation.org...) My second point is that of decreasing prison population. Marijuana illegalisation has been an excuse to lock up minorities for the last 50 years. Prison numbers and demographics prove this. If we want equality, we need this substance legalised. (. https://www.washingtonpost.com...) Finally, if we allow a psychoactive drug like alcohol. And we tax and regulate it. Why now marijuana?
Asylum Seekers should be banned from coming in by boats.

Asylum Seekers may be terrorists. In 2012, an Interpol Red-Listed, convicted, Muslim Egyptian Terrorist, claiming to be an Asylum Seeker arrived to Australia on a boat and was granted access to the country. The Interpol later alerted the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Department of Immigration.The Man was caught before it was too late. The man has murdered many people before. Veteran Liberal MP Wilson Tuckey stated "If you wanted to get into Australia and you have bad intentions, what do you do?" "You insert yourself in a crowd of 100 for which there is great sympathy for the other 99. "You go on a system where nobody brings their papers, you have no identity, you have no address." Seeking Asylum is not illegal in Australia, but coming to Australia by boat, with no visa, is ILLEGAL. If Granted access, illegal immigrants live off taxpayer"s money. Only 4% of Asylum seekers that are granted access into Australia work. The rest of the 96% are not working, what are they doing to support their family? They are robbing and stealing to support their family.
Jewish intermarriage

Your use of the term (creatures) is racist. Now listen Jews are not only Ashkenazi and diseases are in many peoples. Now many Ashkenazi live very long healthy lives look up Jewish longevity. My ancestor lived from 1719-1842. Now why should Jews lose their culture by marrying those who don"t appreciate it?? We have a BRIT with God to obey and live our lives according to his rules. If my son tried to marry a non-Jewish woman I would object and disown him less she converted to Orthodox Judaism.
Jewish intermarriage

Oh no... Jews are no longer marrying other Jews? They're abandoning their parents bullsh*t cult and no longer intermarriage with the same already bottlenecked population of already deformed creatures? Oh the humanity! How are we supposed to preserve our racial purity if we keep interpreting with healthier gentiles? Polluting our gene pool with superior genetics! Driving our bullsh*t cult to extinction as I'd it deserves to go extinct which it does!What next? Are Jews going to start wearing polyester clothing? Are they going to stop stoning homosexuals to death? (Oh wait that already happened) Or, worst of all, are they going to stop mutilating their children's genitals?How f*cking horrifying! Jews are abandoning their bullsh*t bronze age cult, which was made up by a bunch of primitive nitwits who died thousands of years ago! What will come of the world when our primitive desert cult dies off!
Jewish intermarriage

As a Jew myself I see that over 71% of non-Orthodox Jews in the United States marry a non-Jew. This is disastrous for the Jewish people as most of these gentiles don"t want to embrace Judaism or raise the children of these unions as Jews. And even worse Gentile woman cannot give birth to Jewish children without conversion to Orthodox Judaism. So if Jewish men marry these woman the Jewish link breaks this is really sad. What can be done to stop this silent Holocaust on the Jewish people?! I feels it"s a conspiracy by Gentiles to destroy us via assimilation and intermarriage:(