"Celebrating Diversity" is a program of white genocide/Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

Genocide definition(s) Rebuttals:My opponent:"'First of all, I would like to post the official definition of "genocide" as given by the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:'Yes,that is the relevant international law on genocide. (a) Killing members of the group;Many whites have been killed by non-whites who otherwise would not have had the opportunity if non-white immigration and "assimilation" had not been imposed on the white population. That is indisputable. "Please forgive my opponent for insulting your intelligence. Members of ddo know the difference between someone killing a person to get $100 out of his wallet and a government or other large group killing "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a . .. racial. .. group. " Members of ddo also know that crime is commited by members of all racial groups including Whites. The absence of non-Whites certainly does not insure the absence of crime! My opponent:"(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;Here we have the first non-violent act of genocide mentioned,that of serious mental harm. For decades,the anti-white politicians,media executives,educators and academics have been engaged in a coordinated campaign to demonize white historical achievement,to revel in crimes committed by whites(ignoring the similar crimes of other groups),to attempt to eliminate white racial identity,even going so far as to claim that white people are not members of a distinct racial group. In tandem with this white demonization,,and also a heavy promotion of inter-racial sex and marriage. This is clear evidence of a deliberate infliction of serious mental harm on members of my racial group. "Demonize White historical achievement? Every child in the public schools of the Western world takes history classes. They recieve text books that are filled with the names and faces of White people. The few non-White people in these books are often named as enemies. Only until the last few decades has there been an attempt to correct this text book problem. "revel in crimes committed by whites(ignoring the similar crimes of other groups)" . .. for example. .. ?As far as a White racial identity, 500 years ago there were Englishmen, Frenchmen, Italians, Germans, Irishmen, etc. When members of these groups emigrated to America, they inter-bred with each other and lost their ethnic distinctions; so, they then called themselves "White" people. In America, this label was a distinction from the slave class whom they called (when they were being less demeaning) "Black" people. The label "White" has historically been used to denote privilege, not ethnicity, as the labels, "Irish," "English," or "French," did this in prior times. Why didn't the Americans simply call themselves "Americans," rather than "Whites" if it weren't a class/caste distinction? "there has also been a glorification of non-whites and their history" As I stated above, history books are full of the achievements of White people. .. other races should have a fair representation of their histories! Black History Month is unfair to Black people; because, their history is only taught one month out of the year. My opponent:"(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;The imposition of mass non-white immigration and "assimilation" on all white countries(and ONLY white countries) has had a detrimental effect on conditions of life for my racial group. If immigrants are invited to colonise my group`s territory and my racial group ordered to "assimilate" the physical destruction of my racial group(in whole or in part) is the logical and predictable outcome. "Once again, please forgive my opponent for insulting your intelligence. First of all, as stated in the second round, I don't know how other nations do; but, Americans invite immigration. Secondly, if non-Whites live in the same communities, that doesn't mean anyone is forced to marry interracially. .. much different from true genocide! Rebuttal Responses:"'The first response I have to this statement is that there is no such thing as a "White country. " I challenge my opponent to produce documentation in any nation's constitution that declares the nation to be a "White country. "'My opponent has spoken of white people but will not acknowledge that these white people inhabit their own countries that their ancestors created in which they are the majority of the population and therefore deserving of the description "white countries"? My opponent knows what a white country is,the same way he knows what an Arab country is,the same way he knows what a black African country is. "Once again, legally, there is no such thing as a "White country. " Yes, there are countries that have historically had populations which are predominantly "White. " Those countries could only legally be called "White" countries if their laws forbade the immigration of non-Whites into their borders. Yes, I know what you are talking about, but no, they are not "White" by definition of their laws. There is a big difference in what you are talking about and those nations that are called "Muslim countries. " "Whiteness" is not enforced in what you call "White" countries; however, the Muslim religion is certainly enforced in those nations that are known as "Muslim countries. " My opponent:"My opponent argued:'the planet has become "assimilated" because of the actions of WHITE people! 'Really? There are no identifiable racial or ethnic groups in the world because of the actions of white people? If the planet has become "assimilated" as you claim,why do non-white governments not impose mass immigration and "assimilation" on their citizens like governments in Western(read white) countries do? "Because "White" governments WANT to be "assimilated" and immigrated! Governments in the Western world are democratic and are elected by the White people in them. You are proving that "anti-racist" is indeed "anti-racist," and not "anti-White" because White people VOTE otherwise. If White people agreed with you, there would be more racist elected officials! White people in the nations you refer to are in the majority and can vote however they wish. They CHOOSE "assimilation" and immigration. My opponent: "My opponent argued:'History shows that "assimilation" and multi-culturalism has been a big pastime of White people for the last 500 years. 'Even if true,that has no bearing on whether "Celebrating Diversity" as practiced today in "Western"(read white) countries is a program of genocide as per the genocide convention,does it? The phrase "Celebrating Diversity" as used today in "Western"(read white) countries is certainly not used to describe "the great accomplishment of White people over the last 500 years". It is used to describe the situation of a shrinking white population and a growing non-white population in "Western"(read white) countries that white people are ordered to accept or be labelled as "haters" "racists" "white supremacists" leading to personal harassment,loss of livelihood,official sanctions etc ""Celebrating diversity" in no way comes close to the atrocities mentioned in the genocide convention definition! As I mentioned in the second round, "you don't know what 'genocide' is! "I see my opponent conveniently dropped the following argument from the second round:"In the case of one of the nations that White nationalists refer to as a "White country," the United States, in it's Statue of Liberty has the following words displayed,"Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,I lift my lamp beside the golden door! " The (allegedly White) United States thus opened it's doors to those third world people. If those people were not invited by White people with open arms, you might have a slight chance at having a point. "