Oneness Doctrine ver Trinity Doctrine

I note that my definitions have not been contested.Rerebuttals:Pro writes "My friend, In Genesis 1:26 where the term " us " is use, God is referring to himself. It is known as a nominative pronoun singular, and it relates to no object or receiver, making it intransitive and not transitive. In other words, it is an informal term meaning " me. ""Pro is attempting to confuse the significance of this by using terminology like "nominative", "pronoun", "singular", "relates", "or", and even "and". However, I am not fooled. Obviously, "us" is not singular because it is plural. I don't say "We went to the baseball game." if I was the only one who went, and I also don't say "Don't kill us!" if someone is holding a gun to my head. I say "I went to the baseball game." and "Don't kill me.". God didn't say "Let me make man in my image". It's that simple.Pro writes "Question? Why was the personal pronoun singular " his " used, and not the plural pronoun " they " if they are three?"Three what? Gods? That's not what the doctrine of the Trinity says.Pro writes "No proper names was given during this dispensation period, only titles, so let's cross reference this chapter with John chapter 1:10. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. Again, personal pronoun " him " being use here, and not the plural " them. " Do you want me to tell you who that " him " was? It was Jesus my friend."My Bible says "He was in the world, and the world came to be through him, but the world did not know him.". Being made by and coming to be through are very different, so I suppose you should give reasons for preferring your translation.Pro writes "Again, since he did all these things? What did the other two did according to your understanding of three?"Well, the Holy Spirit (for starters) has spoken through the prophets (2 Peter 1:21), was involved with the birth of Jesus (Luke 1:35). Jesus also says of the Holy Spirit "But I tell you the truth, it is better for you that I go. For if I do not go, the Advocate will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to you." (John 16:7). This is another verse that doesn't make sense when interpreted with the Oneness doctrine, because if Jesus and the Holy Spirit are exactly the same, Jesus needn't leave for the Holy Spirit to come.Pro writes "Isaiah 9:6. I'm not going to write the text here, but if you read it carefully, you will see Isaiah prophetically speaking about the Messiah, and mentioned about him being the Everlasting Father."It actually says "he will be called" and then lists a variety of titles. Jesus quite often speaks of himself and the Father as separate, regardless of what that says.Pro writes "A man being a father, a son, and an uncle, doesn't make him three distinct individuals. He just operate differently under these roles."That's because the man you have defined inherently is a father, son, and uncle. If I say "This is a father and his son." is your immediate conclusion "They are the same person!"? Let me take this further. What if I say "This is my son." and my son then goes on to say "I have to leave, but I'll send someone else who can't come unless I go.". Is the logical conclusion that all three people mentioned are the same person? Well, that's what the Oneness doctrine claims.Pro writes "That one being the Holy Spirit, and the body of Christ his temple, yet still being not confined.."The Holy Spirit is in all believers (1 Corinthians 6:19).Pro writes "In Matthew 28:19, it speaks about baptizing in then name of, and not the names of. The word " the " that comes before the noun gives information on how the noun is being used, and it's call a determiner.."The doctrine of the Trinity is not one of three gods. The unity by the three names being one, yet still three distinct names are naturally Trinitarian in nature, as they reflect the one God (name) in three persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit).Pro writes "My friend, when ever you are studying the scriptures, you must learn to discern when Jesus in the New Testament is speaking as a man, and when he is speaking as Deity."You're pretty much asserting that Jesus speaks like both a man and a deity and that he is 100% both without providing any proof. This seems like an attempt to wave away all the times Jesus speaks of the Father and Holy Spirit as entities different from himself without really addressing them.Pro writes "[...] and the dead god that is all evil; [...]"Where did the "dead god that is all evil" come from?Pro writes "Again, refering to how you perceive that chapter and verse, why did God warned Adam to stay away from the tree of good and evil in Genesis 2:17?. Would God warn Adam to stay away from his company of three?"I don't know why God warned Adam to do anything. I'm not God. God is one.Pro writes "In Genesis 11:7, God alone is in operation."Exactly, but he's still plural. Thus, the three persons of the Trinity, yet still one God.Pro writes about IsaiahYou're right about that, I was a little lazy checking my sources. "Us" is clearly God and Isaiah.Arguments:1. Dropped ArgumentsFor starters, I don't notice much a response by my opponent to Matthew 3:16-17.2. An Argument With DistinctionJohn 1:1-3 reads "(1) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (2) He was in the beginning with God. (3) All things came to be through him, and without him nothing came to be.". Jesus is the Word. If God the Father and the Holy Spirit are merely "manifestations" of Jesus, then how was Jesus with himself?John 14:23 reads "Jesus answered and said to him, "Whoever loves me will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our dwelling with him.". WE will dwell with him, not I. Clearly, Jesus and the Father are not identical.2 John 1:9 reads "Anyone who is so "progressive" as not to remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God; whoever remains in the teaching has the Father and the Son.". What's the point of mentioning both the Father and the Son if there is no distinction between them?1 Timothy 2:5 and 1 John 2:1 similarly make it appear that Jesus mediates between men and God the Father. If he actually is God the Father, how does he mediate with himself?Romans 8:26 "In the same way, the Spirit too comes to the aid of our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we ought, but the Spirit itself intercedes with inexpressible groanings." and Romans 8:34 "Who will condemn? It is Christ (Jesus) who died, rather, was raised, who also is at the right hand of God, who indeed intercedes for us.". This makes it sound like Jesus and the Holy Spirit intercede for us in different ways, which would be unusual at best if they are exactly the same.I think that's enough for now, but this is quite compelling evidence for the doctrine of the Trinity, as if Jesus, God the Father, and the Holy Spirit were all different manifestations of the same being that seems to create unnecessary confusion and distinction between things that need not be distinguished between. Therefore, I propose that the Trinity doctrine best resolves the confusion of multiple divine persons but only one God.I'm sorry if I accidentally repeated anything from Round 1, but I accidentally deleted my Round 2 argument the first time I typed it up, and so this entire thing was deja vu to me and I couldn't be sure if I'd brought up any of these arguments already.