Aliens (Etraterrestrials) Exist

"So you accept there is no known technology, so how would you know they exist?" My point was that "we" have no known technology which can detect their transmissions, assuming they do use transmissions at all. Belgian UFO Air Wave: 150 witnesses including police. (see link) http://www.youtube.com... All natural phenomenon dismissed as impossible. (see Youtube links) http://www.youtube.com... Sceptics refuted http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... Con's is assuming aliens have to transmit the same kind of messages we could pick up with our technology, then using the fact that this "assumption" hasn't been realized as proof that they don't exist. "You hold it by blind faith that something exists based on no evidence" Con tried to dismiss my evidence as "natural phenomenon" but could not back it up by telling us what the natural phenomenon is. I have repeatedly shown in the links provided where natural explanations from weather phenomena to helicopters have been squarely refuted. Even the Belgian Air Force Commander says that no human could have been piloting because of the speeds these things were travelling at. What is more, Con blatently says "no evidence," as if eyewitness testimony of trained military professionals isn't evidence! As if radar signals and radiation transmission isn't evidence. As if video record isn't evidence. So I guess Con thinks it was a "lack of evidence" that the CIA confiscated and made CLASSIFIED? He asks me how I know there are other types of transmissions; I never said they were. I was merely saying that if his assumption that the aliens had to use "transmissions" at all was true, the possibility existed that we simply didn't have the technology to pick it up. Was the first radio ever made able to pick up "every sort" or signal? No! Base on past experience with the development of human technology, it is reasonable to suppose we may yet invent devices that transmit other types of signals. This isn't far fetched at all; so another civilization more advanced than ours could do the same. "Would you like me to post many credible documents regarding soldiers in combat suffering from delusions and combat mental diseases?" So the Col and his entire team were suffering from delusions? Well then, I find it awesome that the British Intelligence was able to track that delusion on radar to the landing site. What was the radar picking up? Certainly no delusion. Did that delusion create radiation readings? I doubt that! And if these 5 men were hallucinatin, how comes they all saw the same thing at the same time? Does post-tramatic stress from war cause "co-ordinated" delusions? They took pictures of this thing for crying out loud! If it was a hallucination brought on by illness which they were photographing and examining, why did the CIA confiscate those photoes? Why did they make it classified? Strange that a hallucination was caught on camera! That's Con's big answer? Strange that a figment of the imagination is considered "classified" by the CIA! What evidence does Con give to show these men were indeed suffering from mental illness? None! He assumes they are just because they saw something he doesn't believe in. He ignores completely the fact I showed in the link in my opening post that medical studies show that even the abductees are no less sane than other people. "abduction experients are not different from the general population in term of psychopathology prevalence." http://wzus1.search-results.com... You can't dismiss the testimony of a witness in court by saying "you're crazy," you have to prove it, or show some good reason why he'd be lying, motive, Con has done neither! Nor has he refuted the tangible evidence. "I am not saying they are lying," says Con, then goes on still to sneek in the very opposite: "A washed up airforce pilot or military personal trying to make some money or get some fame." Based on the evidence and the claims, do you believe they were lying, yes or no? Either they were lying, or they were crazy, which is it? As for the reasons you give, these guys are laughed at and ridiculed; they certainly aren't famous! So you think they did this to make money? Did they? The answer to that will be telling; but they already had money and successful careers, why ruin it all with such a tall tale? I'll leave it up to the readers to decide if they think these guys were lying or not! Con's double standard will be shown in that he can't produce any better evidence for demons than I have for aliens. Again, based on the Biblical view of demons, I can't say these spirit beings could be tracked on radar, give off radiation signals, and fly around in metal ships. Since demons are not originally from this planet, we can in a way consider them a form of alien (being in spirit form, a higher form of energy), why then, cannot there also be other types of aliens? "I will await credible sources, funny you never footnote anything." In one of my links (CNN LKL Missile Misfire - 1 of 4 Flying saucer http://wzus1.search-results.com...) you have the actual footage of the UFO firing at a missle and disabling it. It dawned on Jacobs that this "thing" was intricately circling the warhead while both were traveling at 18,000 mph! That is phenomenal maneuverability -- even by today's standards of aviation. Sworn to secrecy by the CIA, years later, Lt. Jacobs felt guilty over keeping this astounding event from the public. He disclosed it in an article published in the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) Journal. And the witnesses did give written testimony. http://www.google.com... "I am after credible evidence and a good point made on the video was only one ever such person was put on the lie detector machine" At last Con tells us what is "credible" evidence. Here are well documented cases where abductees and witnesses passed lie-detector tests: (i.e) "Ultimately, Walton was given the Minnesota Multi Phase Personality Inventory (MMPI), Rorschach (commonly called Inkblot) Polygraph and Psychological Stress Evaluator tests, all of which established that he had told the truth as he knew it. All of these tests were conducted and interpreted by experts." ( Travis Walton Abduction Case) http://www.google.com... Even a group of police officers were cited and passed lie-detection tests; is that "credible" evidence Con? I will respond fully to Con's theological arguments in the next round. He tries to show alien existence conflicts with Bible teachings, but even if he were to refute "Christianity" he has not refuted my case that aliens exist, nor has he proved God doesn't exist. It would only mean my theology was wrong; so this is a red herring. I'll show the two compatible next round. Later