The Big Bang-Abiogenesis-Evolution VS Creationism

Our universe originated at the big bang, because our universe's zero spacial curvature indicates the universe has zero total energy, quantum fluctuations are what nothing is, and cosmic microwave background radiation + red shifting galaxies indicate the current universe is expanding from that big bang.2. Life on earth likely originated by way of abiogenesis, because inorganic compounds likely of an early earth can react and become organic compounds, these amino acids can fold on to each other to become biologically active, and RNA can emerge from an amino acid dominated area which would allow for genetic replication. 3. The biodiversity of life on earth is explained by evolution, because genetic characteristics that allow an organism to live long enough to reproduce are more likely to be passed on, speciation has been observed, and human chromosome 2 is definitive evidence that humans descended from apes.4. Creationism is incorrect simply because the universe wasn't created; creation is a temporal process that requires time and the passage thereof to go from creator to created but, when there was no matter, space, or gravity, there was no time to pass; no universe, no time, no creation. Big Bang:1. Our universe has a zero total energy, because the spatial curvature throughout the universe is zero. All of the positive energy (+matter) is cancelled out by all of the negative energy (-gravity) in our universe so that the total energy of the universe is in fact zero. . http://astrogeo.oxfordjournals.org...As a set, matter and gravity would look like [+matter, -gravity] = 0. So, without a big bang, matter and gravity are at [+0,-0] = 0There is no matter or gravity to speak of and of course the total energy is 0. In this zero energy state, there is no space/time/matter/energy/gravity. .. nothing. How do we know what this nothing is? In our universe of space and matter, when you strip "something" of particles, radiation, and energy, you are left with nothing but empty space; this empty space is full of quantum fluctuations. Quantum fluctuations are sub nuclear particles existing and being annihilated by antiparticles, and the forces between these sub nuclear particles fluctuate as well. This is what nothing is. . http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com...But the sub nuclear particles are something, right? Nope. They never statively exist; they exist and don't exist at the same instant, and it is this fluctuation that makes up nothing. There is no "nothing" without these fluctuations, period. What is nothing? It is a state of fluctuating sub nuclear particles and their forces called quantum fluctuations. That link is a great video for explaining nothing = quantum fluctuations. So, when there was no space or time at [+0,-0] = 0, there were quantum fluctuations where space and time fluctuated in and out of existence with the sub nuclear particles and their forces. The zero energy [+0,-0] = 0 quantum fluctuations are an unstable state, because of the constant fluctuating of these sub nuclear particles. So. .. These fluctuations, nothing, are so unstable that energy is guaranteed to be expressed from these quantum fluctuations. Unstable [+0,-0] = 0 --> The Big Bang [+1,-1] = 0At the big bang, we have (+1) some matter and (-1) some gravity, which now allows for stative space and time. The universe expands [+10,-10] = 0Inflation accelerates [+100000,-100000] = 0So from zero energy quantum fluctuations [+0,-0], there was the big bang [+1,-1] = 0Something [+1,-1] from nothing [+0,-0]. The big bang left cosmic microwave background radiation behind. With the right radio telescope, even you can see that the space between the stars above us isn't just black space, it's filled with microwave radiation. . http://aether.lbl.gov...NASA has measured it with an anisotropy probe located on a space shuttle called WMAP. . http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov...The radiation is basically uniform except for minor thermal variations proportional to the variations we've measured in quantum fluctuations. . http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov...So we know that from quantum fluctuations the Big Bang was expressed, not created, thus there is no creator of the universe, because there was no creation; creation is a temporal concept that requires time, and at [+0,-0] there is no space or time; there was no time for creation to happen. With light, longer rays of light are in the red end of the spectrum while shorter rays of light are in the blue end of the spectrum. When we look out at other galaxies, the light that hits us is in the red end of the spectrum (red shift) indicating that the light is being elongated, or stretched out as the senders of the light, other galaxies, are moving away from us and we from them thanks to inflation, which started at the big bang. . https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...2. Abiogenesis:Compounds covalently (sharing electrons) bonded to carbon are organic. Compounds not covalently bonded to carbon are inorganic. Inorganic = H N C O (cyanate)Organic = C 2 H 5 N O 2 (glycine, an amino acid)You can tell that the difference between inorganic and organic carbon compounds is rather insignificant. One more carbon atom, four more hydrogen atoms, and one more oxygen atom. .. that's it. The Miller-Urey experiment in the 50's demonstrated that with an atmosphere, water salinity, electricity, and inorganic compounds likely of an earlier earth, inorganic compounds will produce organic amino acid compounds. . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...Though people agreed that lightning occurs without life and in atmospheres on other planets, people still complained that the atmosphere of earlier earth had more oxygen than the Miller-Urey experiment accounted for. The replicated experiments of the Miller-Urey took that into account, and used:1. H2, CH4, NH3, H2O, H2S and electricity, and yielded the amino acids cysteine, cystine, and methionine2. CH4, C2H6, NH3, H2S and UV rays, and yielded alanine, glycine, serine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and cystine3. CH4, H2O, H2S, NH3, N2, and electricity, and yielded methionine. http://www.pnas.org... "When reduced gases, including CH4, H2S and NH3, are emitted from a volcano into a lightning-rich atmosphere, hydrogen cyanide, ethylene, and acetylene can be generated. ". http://www.pnas.org...So we know that amino acids, organic compounds, can come from inorganic compounds. But what about genetic replication? Amino acid chains (polypeptides) can fold onto themselves and become biologically active. According to the NIH:"The sequence of the amino acid chain causes the polypeptide to fold into a shape that is biologically active. ". http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov...So we have biologically active amino acids. .. how do they replicate? Well amino acids tend to speed up reactions; they're catalysts. So before there was life, there were pre-biotic catalysts, amino acids. "catalysis in a pre-biotic network initiated. .. the emergence of RNA as the dominant macromolecule due to its ability to both catalyze chemical reactions and to be copied in a template-directed manner. ". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...So, from inorganic compounds of earlier earth, we got organic amino acids, which, when folded, become biologically active, and can catalyze reactions that lead to the emergence of RNA, which is necessary for genetic replication. Any primitive organism would be replicating with RNA and metabolizing with amino acids, but what might they be consuming? "Sixty years after the seminal Miller-Urey experiment that abiotically produced a mixture of racemized amino acids, we provide a definite proof that this primordial soup, when properly cooked, was edible for primitive organisms. ". http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...Evolution:3. Evolution just states that organisms that live long enough to reproduce pass on their genetic characteristics that helped them live long enough to reproduce. As organisms migrate to different environments, different genetic characteristics lead to "living long enough" to reproduce. Those that live long enough to reproduce pass on their genes more successfully than those who do not live long enough to reproduce in the different environment. Genetic changes over time lead to different species from a parent species. Speciation has been observed. The three spine stickleback fish has been observed speciating. At one observed point, a member of the parent species could reproduce with other members of the parent species group and their offspring, and at a later observed point, the newer offspring were genetically incompatible with the parent species group. . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...This is the definition of a new species; evolution observed. Also, the Hawthorne Fly, used to feed on the fruit of hawthorns. Once apples were introduced into their environment, some of the hawthorn flies fed only on the apples, while the typical hawthorn fly remained eating the fruits of hawthorns. Now, since so much time has passed, currently, apple eating hawthorns (apple maggot flies) mature later in the season, and require chemicals from apples that help with fertilization/reproduction. . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...The original hawthorn fruit eaters simply do not interbreed with the apple eaters. They are now two different species, and the parasites that inhabit them have also evolved along with the diet change. . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...Next round I'll elaborate more, but humans have one fewer pair of chromosomes than the great apes. .. because two ape chromosomes fused to make our 2nd chromosome. . http://genome.cshlp.org...