Disability checks and welfare checks go against the concept of natural selection.

"False...through trade." One needs money to start a buisness. This goes back to the friendly vs unfriendly loans. "Socialism is bad..." You failed to cite any sources or explain at all. I am a democratic socialist. This is, however, insignificant. Capitalism goes against natural selection, as you failed to deny. (See counterpoint) "...the uneven...genetic success." We don't need to measure genetic success; natural selection does that *for us.* Capitalism makes it possible for bad genes to be sheltered by money. The people with good genes don't need sheltering. "I quote...mental health." My bad; 2008 had 23 deaths. Compare that to the 53,400,000 (http://www.wholesomewords.org...) that die each year. Again, it is insignificant. Also, those that died never got a single disability check; they were dead, not disabled. "Queen Victoria was...deaths here." We are all the result of mutations. Genes and richness do not correspond perfectly. "Also...highly doubt it." If one looks at the circumstances, one can see that it is an isolated case. 1. "People who are more genetically fit to their environment have a lesser chance of gaining a disability." Negligibly. I concede the fact, and only the fact, not the implications. I have demonstrated time and time again that the difference is negligible. (Extend all evidence that so indicates) 2. "People who are more genetically fit will on average make more moneythan those who are less genetically fit." Concede. 3. "Welfare checks and disability checks distribute money to the poor and the disabled." Concede. 4. "Having more money increases one's chances of survival." Concede. 5. "Welfare checks and disability checks increase the chances of survival for the genetically unfit." Wrong. 3 and 4 do not support 5 because neither 3 nor 4 relates to genetic fitness. 6. Concede. 7. False. The greater the peak difference between the genetically unfits' death rate and birth rate, the faster natural selection will occur. (Peak difference is important because a population boom will lead to a bottleneck; the rate wdwwwwwwevolution is increased by the bottleneck, but not decreased because of the boom.) 8. "Welfare checks and disability checks lessen the difference in the chance of the genetically fit surviving and the chance of the genetically unfit surviving." False; no 5. 9. "Welfare checks and disability checks slow down the process of natural selection." See my counterpoint. 10. Concede. 11. Nopez. Counterpoint: My opponent has conceded my counterpoint; 1. Natural selection occurs more slowly without overpopulation and more quickly with overpopulation. Conceded. 2. Welfare checks contribute to overpopulation. Conceded. 3. To slow down is to go against, to speed up is go for. Conceded. 4. Welfare checks cause natural selection to occur more quickly. (1 and 2) 5. Welfare goes for evolution. (4 and 3) 6. Welfare checks do not go against evolution. (5) Counterpoint 2: 1. Welfare checks minimize the uneven distribution of wealth by giving money from the rich to the poor. (Definition of welfare checks) 2. Uneven distribution of wealth can shelter genetically unfit people. (Conceded) 3. Genetically fit people do not naturally need sheltering. (Definition of Survival of the Fittest) 4. Sheltering of genetically unfit people goes against natural selection. (2, 3, definition of natural selection) 5. Welfare checks minimize sheltering of unfit people. (1, 2) 6. Welfare checks minimize what that goes against natural selection. (4, 5) 7. Minimizing what goes against natural selection is to be for natural selection. 8. Welfare checks go for natural selection. (6, 7) 9. Welfare checks do not go against natural selection. (8)