The death penalty should exist.

Thankyou for debating me on this topic. I am Pro (for) the death penalty. I do not advocate everyone is deserving of the death penalty, only someone who is destructive of some ones life, i.e; Murderer, Rapist, Child abuser... or anyone who has committed something directly to a person that has left them severely damaged either physically, emotionally or sexually. My reasoning as to why someone should receive the death penalty is...: A, The criminal refuses psychological help. B, The criminal can find loop holes to eventually get back into normal society. C, The criminal does not show remorse for the crime. D, The criminal is suspected or admits to re-offenses if let out. E, The criminal causes more crimes within the prison. F, The criminal has an overly short crime sentence for the crime. (suspected of getting a good deal) Obviously, as I said previously, I only advocate the death penalty, or at least death row for criminals who is under those categories. And who has lead a person to be severely damaged physically, emotionally or sexually on purpose. These people who are just bad people, even though they most likely got the short end of the stick growing up and had a horrible life, possibly being subjected to the same torment and are simply in the vampire effect stage, are not fit to be in society. I have debated a few other people on the subject of education, free will and rights for adolescents and animals. In all of these I have used the same argument and I believe it's fitting for this one also. In society, we have all agreed to, with or without knowing, that to be in society we must comply with the law, some are grey and we break them often; speeding, drug use etc. But others are black and white; rape, murder, abuse etc. We all agree that the last 3 are not fit for our society and we condemn those who commit such acts; that means that we all agree that the people who commit these crimes should be put in an isolated environment that is monitored to make sure they stay there. The problem I have is that a lot of paedophiles get released and re-offend, same thing with rapists and sometimes murderers (usually in gangs or cults though, or just psychopaths). If we were all assured that they would live comfortably under surveillance without the knowledge of public events for the rest of their life, being treated with doctors and psychologists appropriately, then a lot of us would be completely okay with that. Also, the criminals should be working within the prison in a confined area (so they enter with nothing but clothes and leave with nothing but clothes, so they can't make weapons etc.) with no payment. However, after a while we have to consider... why does a criminal get the best of both worlds? Someone who ruined someone's life or broke up a family gets to live in peace? And our tax payer money gets to give them this luxury? Why do they get to live happily while these people are miserable? We know the victims go through depression, anxiety, stress, a lot commit suicide. At what point do you put justice over mercy? If we painlessly remove them from the world we can all live knowing there is no chance of them getting out and re-offending again. If there is some part of my argument, please address it separately in the same post and I will adhere and apply anything you specifically dislike or don't want in our debate. Thanks. Kryptic. This is my argument, I will now pass it over to Con.