Abortion should be illegal.

I am going to be using the argument that rape should be an exception against my oponent now that my opponent has agreed that a woman should be able to have an abortion if she is raped.What is the value of life?When you consider people in life, you rank people by their importance to you. For example, you would not want one of your family members to die. But you also don't want other people you don't know to die either if they haven't done anything wrong. You'd like to think that you want everybody to have the same chance at life. But if one of two people got terminal cancer, you would most likely want the person you don't know to get cancer over one of your family members. This illustrates the fact that people value the lives of some people more than the lives of other people. You can say that everybody should have an equal chance at life, but when you go through this thought experiment, you actually put a higher value on the lives of some people than you do on others.Let's consider abortion. My opponent in the second round clarified that people who are raped should be able to have an abortion. But take a look at the fetus. The fetus knows very little of anything inside the womb. The fetus does not know if it was the product of a rape, a product of marital sex, or the product of two teenagers messing around. But my opponent in this debate says that a fetus isn't worth as much as the mother if the mother was raped. The value of life in this case in unequal because the mother still maintains her right to life while the fetus is denied the right to life. But what's so wrong with getting an abortion if two teens were screwing around and they have the financial capacity to pay for an abortion? Is the value of life for the innocent fetus suddenly greater than the value of the life of a fetus produced under rape? If it's right for the killing of a fetus produced under rape, why are you suddenly saying it's wrong for the killing of a fetus produced under consensual sex? We are deciding the action to have or not to have an abortion not based on the fetus' right to life, but an action based on how the fetus was conceived. Therefore, the value of the baby's life doesn't really matter when deciding an abortion because if it did, my opponent would be arguing that abortion should be illegal even when the fetus was conceived under rape, incest, or other forms of non-consensual sex. If all fetuses are substantially equal to another, they should have all the same rights, but if the fetus doesn't have a say to the right to life in being raped, how should the fetus suddenly have the right to life if it was conceived under consensual sex? The fact is that my opponent in saying that arbortion should only be legal under rape, doesn't really care if an innocent baby is killed because the method for determining whether or not the fetus is aborted is dependent on the way a baby was conceived.Then why should abortion be illegal for people wanting one if the life of the fetus in a rape case can easily be terminated? The life of the fetus shouldn't mean a whole lot in any abortion case. Because of this I don't see why abortion can't be a legal option for all pregnant women. I await my opponent's response.