should japan be allowed to rearm with nuclear arms

"ok so 1. by my opponets logic we should have been nuked by brittan cause we beat them but we have an alliance with them now huh thats odd aint it.." Ok for one i hate people who try to be smart secondly we are not talking about British we are talking about Japan, seeing how i have said they have used suicide bombers and so on he ignored why because you can clearly see with past events they are the type of people to not care about rationality but honor we had to use 2 nukes on them just to make them surrender. I assure you death by the blast,heat, or radiation is not very pleasnt , im sure we kill lots of innocent people as well as japanese soldiers the wars between british and america was not that bad considering back then wars usually didn't have civilian casualties as much as a nuke has done to japan. Your comparison sucks. I dont know did we nuke the british twice. 3: there is only 1 treaty against japan rearm and thats by us so you can drop the treaty arguement. also this would go against more than just that treaty but the idea Obama is trying to create but reducing nuclear arms not adding them, and congress would argue this bill to over turn that treaty for awhile you twit which was the political up roar you would case by such a suggestion. 4: my opponet dropped the arguements about china and north korea also he dropped my world politics arguement O i have to say it now...... Objection!! look here in your words: 1 japan should rearm better stratgic alliance in asia us doesnt spread its self so thin 2 japan can deter north korea and china from nuclear esclation 3 us can focus on more vital areas in world politics 4 japan is at the least risk to strike against us Now i clearly attack the point your entire case stood on which was number 4. Without number 4 your number 3 2 and 1 would fall because if they were not the least risk then we couldn't do number 3 nor number 2. Your whole case was a 4 story building and i just attacked your support beams at the bottom! Anyway now from your numbers to your letters i will also add its bad to add more info into a rebuttle.. Wow after looking at your new arguments you added i must say they still cannot stand if you can't prove number 4. A: The US being spread so thin gets attacked because of weak apperance causes nuke genocide and WWIII with worse causlities. That a really big "assumption" yes exactly assumption you assume that this will happen but you have to look at this we have all these allies : - Australia - Egypt - Israel - South Korea - Jordan - New Zealand (despite being suspended from the ANZUS alliance) - Argentina - Bahrain - Philippines - Thailand - Kuwait - Morocco - Pakistan yeah we are all by our selfs only japan can save use now... B: How do you know them possessing nukes will deter North Korea any way? you can't seeing how we have nukes to and apperently your saying our nukes arn't detering them what differnece would japan make. C: Again you assume Japan having nukes will solve the problem yet our nukes in the U.S are not detering them yeah very big hole there. D: Objection! false i have proven how.. One on how giving them military strength my lead to them attacking us out of past transgressions such AS NUKES.