Isn't it enough to be careful frm my side not to stand in the middle of the busy roadbut on footpath

1.) A school van was driving without any details and indications that it was a school transport vehicle which was required by the law of my country (India). 2.) The school van was firstly driving at a wrong lane i.e. left side from where cars come inside the area, not go outside. 3.) It was driving at a high speed in a residential area where speed limit should be maintained as per law. 4.) It was driving at a high speed even though there were norms regarding school transport vehicles to maintain speed limit in my country. 5.) It was driving at a high speed even though there was a speed breaker which was again a violation of a state laws. 6.) Even while crossing the speed breaker, it drove at a such a high speed that it splashed swamp on me and dirtied my clothes which could be avoided if it was driving slowly. 7.) I was walking on the footpath towards my home. When I reached near the speed-breaker, the school-van firstly went into the wrong lane, secondly did not slow-down in the speed-breaker, and thirdly, splashed swamp on me. NOW A STUPID PERSON SAYS THAT I SHOULD NOT HAVE STOOD NEAR THE SWAMP. My points against this person are: 1.) It is stupid to think that only one person should follow all the duties while the other is privileged by all the rights in the world. The authority and responsibility relationship says that both the driver and me should follow their duties at par and some part of duty driver should fulfill and some of it me because if only I fulfill my duties but other does not then this leads to chaos and oppressive and careless behavior of the other because today he has splashed swamp, tomorrow he might even kill someone with his rash driving as he might become more rash if it is not checked. I am not intended to put my life in danger unlike that eunuch. I have already fulfilled my duty by not standing in the middle of the road where the cars go by. Now this eunuch thinks that I should spend more energy and waste resources by not standing near the swamp also. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!! :D :D. 2.) If we have paid taxes for the road to the government, then we have the right to stand and use the footpath. It is the government's responsibility to repair depressions in the road as we pay taxes for that. Not worrying about whether we had paid taxes or not and not using the facility for which we have paid taxes is a careless attitude towards money which this eunuch does not know. 3.) Actually, I was standing because I was watering my plants near my doorstep which I had the right to do so. This eunuch means to say that I should not have watered my plants? Who is going to water my plants then? This eunuch's father? I guess that this eunuch's father has volunteered to become my gardener but I need skilful people too. 4.) If I was simply walking on the footpath and there was depression on both sides of the road filled with swamp on both sides, does this eunuch expect me to fly over the footpath instead of walking? In that case I would have become a superman and would be ruling the world by now. 5.) According to this eunuch, she should make sure to never enter a building, keeping in mind the way builders use materials to build the building. Ofcourse, it was the commuters fault to use a fly-over which collapsed even though there was a legal right to travel. A small measure of not entering a building at all and living in a slum can take a lot of stress off this eunuch's mind. Perhaps she likes living in a slum and she posting comments from there as living in a slum is not a stress according to her. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! ROFL-LOL!!! :D :D :D :D :D SO KEEPING IN MIND OF MY POINTS ABOVE, DO YOU THINK I WAS WRONG IN STANDING NEAR THE SWAMP? IF YES, THEN GIVE ME CONCRETE REASONS AS TO WHY. ALSO, IF U THINK THAT I WAS WRONG, PLS ANSWER TO ALL THOSE 5 POINTS AS TO WHY ALL THOSE 5 POINTS WHICH I MENTIONED IS WRONG.