Time travel is impossible / time does not exist

"They've taken two clocks. Left one on the ground, and flew the other around the world, and when they came back to the same spot, the clocks showed different times, so they had something to compare them to (each other). " Ok, this is the Atomic Clock experiment. How these clocks work is they measure the amount of radioactive decay, and based on that they can tell how long it has been decaying, essentially making a clock. They flew one clock around the world at high speed and the one on the ground stayed stationary. Because the clock flying around the world was moving at a higher speed they claim it essentially went slightly forward in time. I will post a segment from a website that debunks this experiment. . http://www.thefinaltheory.com... A core concept of General Relativity is that it is fundamentally impossible to distinguish the effect of gravity on Earth from that of accelerating through space at the rate of 1g. This is known as the Principle of Equivalence. So, even according to General Relativity, the astronaut could accelerate to even 99% of light speed and travel for as long as he wished, and upon return to Earth there would be no mysterious ‘time dilation' effects whatsoever; his twin would be the same age as him. That is according to both Special Relativity and General Relativity – no ‘relativistic time dilation', no ‘relativistic mass increase', and no ‘relativistic length contraction'. Further, as stated earlier above, General Relativity fails so completely to explain the motion of stars in galaxies that concepts as wild as mysterious ‘Dark Matter' filling the universe must be invented to try to retain the theory. So, what exactly is going on with all the claims about Einstein's Relativity Theories by our scientists? Even Einstein's own theory shows this is impossible! As shown above in the Twin Paradox explanation, Einstein's Special Relativity Theory has a logical flaw, initially appearing to predict such effects, but a closer examination shows that they should not occur. We could consider either the airplane or the Earth below to be in motion since everything is relative, giving totally opposite results. So, even according to Einstein's own theory there should be no absolute time difference when an atomic clock is flown on a jet. This is a theory that clearly displays its own futility, which should be expected from any theory whose basic mathematical support is propped up by clear errors and improper hidden mathematical operations. So why do we hear reports of success in these atomic clock experiments? Since we have no rational or scientific reason to expect such effects, it stands to reason that these reports are either erroneous or they reflect other effects such as turbulence or acceleration effects on the plane and instruments. Note that although it is commonly stated that atomic clocks operate by reading the inner oscillations of individual atoms, in actuality they are very cumbersome, delicate instruments that operate on the external properties of clouds of atoms as they are accelerated and irradiated by various fields. One could imagine many ways in which the delicate machinery of an atomic clock might be affected by a variety of environmental influences that might occur on an airplane flight. Again, Einstein's own relativity theory states that we could look at the situation from either perspective -- a moving atomic clock on a jet or a stationary clock and jet as the Earth moves instead -- invalidating any claims that one absolute result was experimentally observed. There are many logical explanations for every experiment. We must use Occams Razor "when faced with competing hypotheses that are equal in other respects, selecting the one that makes the fewest new assumptions" Time is an assumption, when there are other logical elements that could affect a clock we must take them all into account, not just assume that time is the cause. Science has become almost like a religion, with Einstein as their prophet. If you deny their great prophet Einstein you will burn in science hell for all eternity. We need to get out of that silly mindset and realize there is ALWAYS possibility for even the most fundamental scientific theories to be completely wrong.