Convert Me

I apologize for the lack of a response to your argument but the subject of scientific inaccuracies in the Q'uran is saturated with propaganda against said religion which, based on the inclusion of Turkish and Ummayad in the language filter is almost exclusively to gain converts. I will first respond to the statement "It prophecizes that his body will be found naturally preserved for future generations of humans as a lesson. No Muslim knew of this truly until recently; it is commonly known that if a human body is thrown into a body of warm water, everything from the fish to the bacteria will devour the corpse." Although a body was found (it is in a Youtube video but my current device does not allow me to imbed the video name is pharaohs body found in red sea.) this website, (http://answers.yahoo.com...) a comment in said video, and the book kingfisher's mummy's says that the body was from pre- dynastic Egypt, not identified with any pharaoh and found in the ground as the pots and dirt surrounding the body prove in the video. Yes bodies can last as long as that due to natural mummification. The description of the big bang in the video is not only vague (the heaven and the earth joining together) but has been mentioned in several other religions including the Judeo-Christian Tradition and the Ancient Egyptian religion. Also two bodies joining together had absolutely nothing to do with the big bang's theory of expansion from nothingness. As for the moon reflecting light this theory has been known since Greek times and any idiot would know this because if it gave off full light it wouldn't be in phases. I learned this fact in school but could not find a source but the lack of a name for an inventor of this theory will show how old it is. You underestimate the ancients understanding as for example Aristotle knew the earth was round due to the curvature of the moon. I am afraid that god would have had a better word for earth than an ostrich egg as if you google search the word ostrich egg you will find pictures that are similar to chicken eggs and I doubt when he did compare it he didn't mean an exact shape but probably a metaphor but the exact text given to me might help. Not to mention for the mention made of the earth revolution, did I hear him say the Sun revolves? It does not revolve and the Copernican theory was developed by Philolaus which you can learn more about here. http://en.wikipedia.org... As for the expanding earth this creation is also in the Greek religion and was followed by Anatolian pagans who probably were converted with this idea being similar to the Christian adoption of pagan ideas. The plant sex argument could hold ground as I found no reference of the discovery of that fact I know that monks around the year 1000 bred plants such as peas with no wonder at the fact that plants have sexes and plants do not have individual sexes but both. Also your video says that there is a barrier between sweet and salty water. I have never encountered "sweet water" and wonder if he means fresh water. Perhaps I shall ponder this one with some sweet water at my local convenience store. Mountains do not keep the earth from shaking and the earth upon creation with no landmasses but smooth earth at no point shook uncontrollably. As for everything being created from water this is an ancient philisophical idea of ancient Greece and china, water being considered the base element. When the man in the video talks about the life of insects I must ask, Why is this significant? These creatures are not unobservable and if the Q'uran made some life altering discovery about their lives he would have logically told us them. And finally, embryos are not made of a leech like substance. I am sorry for any offending but I am simply saying your source of science is unable to be trusted. If I am shown actual proof I will be open minded to the faith of Islam.