Men have easier life than women

>>>>"Men have easier life than women". 1. PRO pointing out that not all men endure physical labor is utterly meaningless. She was the first one to resort to this "Not all X does this" argument when it was clear that this debate was being presented in terms of what is the stereotypical/ideal "MAN/Woman. " 2. PRO never explains how improvement of technology as well as there being some treaties and alliances over all demonstrates tha the world is becoming more civilized (as in, we are abandoning the concept of war). Technology has ALWAYS been improving in the lifespan of our species known as "homosapiens" (we've gone through hitting each other with sticks, to hitting each other with swords, to using bows and arrows against each other to using guns to airplanes to using jets to using nuclear missiles)(not to mention that technology can and IS used to fuel war). Having treaties and alliances is no different. And regardless of whether or not you buy into PRO's argument that the world is becoming more civilized, this is not only a hardly relevant point, but she hasn't proven that the world has become civilized so much to the point where the amount of men fighting in them is SPARSE as that would be the only true means of combating my argument that men fight in wars. 3. Okay . . . even if they do work out because of their needs, how is this relavant in proving who has to put more work into getting some sex? The answer is that it isn't. 4. And I agree that there isn't 100% sureness that women will survive child birth, however, the fact that the chances are EXTREMELY low in addition to the fact that WOMEN HAVE AN OPTION as to whether or not they wish to bear a child demonstrates just how little relavance this point has for the instigator. As for women in all developed countries refusing to give birth, that could very well lead to chaos (unless developed countries took advantage of the overpopulation in undeveloped countries via adoption), however, fortunately, many women CHOOSE to give birth. However, PRO's idea that women get together and say things such as "For the good our country, I shall give birth so that our population can sustain itself" as it bears little to resembalance to the real world. 5. Well I don't know about "not using EVIDENCE. " I only agreed not to point out that PRO's arguments were based on stereotypes (until PRO went against this in R2). Anyway, this argument concerned choice and I've shown that women have an OPTION when it concerns having a period (in response to PRO advocating that men had a choice in contrary to woemn), due to medical advances. >>>>"Men have easier life than women because they aren't supposed to be looking after the household". 1. I'm not going to dispute whether or not PRO truly meant what she said or whether or not her first round was clear enough. I shall leave that for YOU, the audience, to determine as I don't wish to use up characters on entertaining the aforementioned query. Anyway, she says women can be single parents too. I agree, they can. However, this does nothing to help PRO's argument as we only come to conclusion that both men and women can have difficulty when it comes to these matters, thereby suggesting that the neither men or women have it easier, thereby negating the topic. As for me (as a man) having the option to cope with a woman who has a low paying job and poor housework abilities, I agree that it is my choice and that I can very well leave the woman. However, last I checked, a woman has the option of doing the same, so once more, this just goes to suggest equality. And given that there are also "many many men who go to work (no matter how well-paid it may be, it's still a JOB) and apart from that have to look after the household, definitel", this would simply once again bring us to the conclusion that the difficulty is equal overall, therefore negating the topic. >>>>> "Men have easier life than women because they don't have to look after themselves as much as women do". 1. Yes, they want to impress women. I'm glad we can agree, though I'm not sure how this refutes my argument on men having to put more work into impressing a "potential partner. " (don't bother looking at point 3 in the earlier argument as it doesn't prove that "women have a harder time impressing a "potential partner" either. 2 (a and b I guess, in spite of the fact that a is dropped by PRO). There's no question that most women do care about their appearance, but the same can still be said for men, hence my argument for working out (or to generalize a bit more, men having to make sure they appear STRONG whether it be mentally or physically). But as far as women choosing the best partner for their prospective children, not necessarily given that most are more concerned with how a man can satisfy their needs (it's just too presumptous to suggest that most women are thinking about how a man can father their future child and just as presumptous to suggest that these women are even concerned with the possibility of a child before even getting with a man). At any rate though, none of this addresses how men have a harder time getting action from a typical woman than women do getting any action from a typical man (and for those who don't know, by action, I mean "sex"), so consider that argument as dropped on PRO's part and therefore conceded to. Again, PRO brings up women having to shave their legs, wear make up and such, but I've countered this in both of my rounds by pointing out that not only do men have to worry about grooming, but also about working out (which, if you recall PRO's concern on having to put up with physical labor, this factoid should proves significant in countering PRO's argument). 2c. If a women has the need to go a whorehouse, it is considered weird? Since when do individuals in general consider it socially acceptable (or rather, NOT WEIRD) for a MAN to go to a whorehouse much less participate in any form or prostitution? The answer is that it is not considered socially acceptable for a man to do this either. Thus, all PRO manages to establish here is equal difficulty for both men and women. >>>CONCLUSION as to whose arguments are more convincing: At the very most, PRO's arguments manage to show that men and women have equal difficulties. For instance, she may have pointed out there are cases where women are single thus have to take care of their households and work at a job, but, given how I've shown that there are cases where men are single and thuse have to take care of their households and have a job, this balances out. Such is the nature of a majority of this debate. That said, I've also managed to go the extra mile and show that men indeed have it more difficult than women given how men (generally) have a harder a time getting some "action" than women do and how there generally is far more physical labor to endure for a man than there is a woman (and note that PRO considered PHYSICAL PAIN as a means of determining who had it harder). Thus, either way you take it (whether it be that the difficulties of men and women balance out or that women do indeed have it easier in life than men), I have defeated the opposition and am therefore worthy of the CON vote in terms of whose argument was more convincing. >>>Spelling/grammar: I'd like for you to observe this statement made by my opponent: "World is not becoming more and more civilized? " Shouldn't it be "THE" world is not becoming more and more civilized? Mistakes like these are rather common in PRO's case, ergo, it is quite clear that you should vote CON on the matter of spelling/grammar. >>>Realiable sources: Please note the evidence I presented during this debate as well as how PRO scoffed at the notion of me presenting evidence. >>>Conduct: Refer back to PRO's "tactics" in R2 as well as how they changed the flow of this debate. Thanks for debate!