God can never be disproved officially and scientifically.

I'm sure this will be a healthy debate. I will agree with Pro, Einstein did in fact not equate himself as being part of the atheist community, in fact he was open to the idea of a "higher mind". He admired the cosmos, looked at it with awe which brought him to come up to such conclusions regarding a deity. It is recorded in his journals though he didn't accept the Christian bible as being the inspired words of a all powerful being, even though he recognized the book as having some good aspects, but he believed it was primitive at best. I can provide sources in the comments section if anyone wants to know sources of what I finished describing regarding Einstein's position on a deity. How can a supernatural being(s) be disproved using science? Well it hasn't been yet but lets look at what has been done so far, by science to disprove things attributed to a deity. Long before man had telescopes, most believed the world was the center of the universe, the stars were spirits of dead kings of old, and there was a giant creature or creatures supporting the earth. All of which was attributed to some form of a deity(s) of the time. Today we understand that these are fables that are incorrect in explaining those natural phenomena to which are adequately answered using natural explanations. We understand that our solar system is simply hanging at the very tail of our galaxy, which is in a giant pool of other such galaxies possibly containing infinite worlds, not that the earth is the center of the universe (not even close). We understand that most stars that we see in the sky are in fact dead, but not dead kings, but rather dead stars to which their light has finally reached earth. We understand that earth isn't supported by any deity or creature but rather gravity (which we don't fully understand yet either) which is the mechanism behind why earth simply doesn't float away from the sun into outer space. Thunder was at one time attributed to Thor, bringing down the hammer of justice to their enemies, like the frost giants. Other cultures attributed thunder and lightening to Zeus, being either angry at humanity or fighting titans in the sky. We understand today that such fables are incorrect in explaining thunder and lightening. "Thunder....which is essentially a stream of electrons flowing between or within clouds, or between a cloud and the ground. The air surrounding the electron stream is heated to as hot as 50,000 degrees Fahrenheit, which is three times hotter than the surface of the sun." - Scientific American Now what does this have to do with the notion that my opponent proposed you may ask? Simply that eventually science will be able to explain more things that turn out to be natural phenomena versus attributed to a deity. Reverting to his first comment in reference to Einstein, because Albert attributed such awe inspiring things to a deity of some kind, doesn't validate the belief that a deity of any kind in fact exist or not. Yet, just like scientists of old attributed certain phenomena's to a god when their understanding reached a certain limit but was eventually discovered that they are scientifically explained thus taking the "god" equation out (i.e.. Newton didn't understand how the moons of Jupiter and Saturn were able to orbit them while orbiting the sun thus attributed the notion to a higher being) means that eventually Yahweh, Jehovah, Jesus, Odin, Allah, Krishna, Horus, Thor, etc. will likely be presented as being nothing more than fables and that scientifically god isn't real or necessary for our universe. Now my opponent may ask, well how does this explain the possibility that any of the aforementioned deities don't exist even if the phenomena attributed to them have natural explanations today? I will say, almost all the things attributed to them has been explained away using natural explanations and for one thing, anyone can visit Mt. Olympus and see that it's barren, no sign of any of the gods believed to exist there. That is my position on the notion presented so far, look forward to my opponents response.