Can Bohemian Rhapsody be considered the "Greatest song of all time?"

My kind (or shall I say unkind sir) for whether you like it or not everything debated ever is based solely off opinions. If there was a conformity of a factual truthful answer to every problem in the world maybe your rude comments would help up just the slightest. To restate what I said in the beginning of my statement, when I say "Greatest song of all time" I am also referring that of such which is made by a band/individual in the most recent of time (past century). And I would like to think my line to line dissection wasn't pointless, it was a somewhat accurate description of the meaning behind a very powerful song, sung by one of the greatest vocalists of all time ( which really isn't arguable that Freddie Mercury was one of the greatest vocalists to ever exist) and also the fact that my interpretation is really too deep into is really for my own philosophical benefit, I really think this song also could portray lyrically Freddie's struggle with being a homosexual in society, which included his death due to AIDS, makes this song very much emotionally stronger. And then your introduction of statistics. I can understand what you're saying but statistics really has nothing to prove with the quality of a song. We can't stop does not deserve as much credit as other music that is being made by other artists, but since it is statistically making more "money" should we consider it a better song? I think logically the answer is no to that. Pertaining to your list choice, I see Flo-Rida is on the list 5 times for best singles, so you're saying that makes him one of the greatest musical artists to ever live? No, because music is based on the quality and the richness of its sound and message. No one listens to song and thinks "Wow statistically this is a great song" I also find interesting that you say that since it never won a Grammy it is not good, but perhaps you forgot to read "In 2004 the song was inducted into the Grammy Hall of Fame." But I thought since we are bringing up statistics I could include some as well, even though again I don't think judging by statistics is a good way to judge quality of music. 1. As of 2004, "Bohemian Rhapsody" is the second most played song on British radio, in clubs and on jukeboxes collectively, after Procol Harum's "A Whiter Shade of Pale" 2. On 30 September 2007 on the Radio 1 Chart Show, for BBC Radio 1's 40th birthday, it was revealed that "Bohemian Rhapsody" was the most played song since Radio 1's launch. 3. In 2012, the song topped an ITV poll in the UK to find 'The Nation's Favourite Number One' over 60 years of music, ahead of Michael Jackson's "Billie Jean" (No.2), Adele's "Someone like You" (No.3), Oasis' "Don't Look Back in Anger" (No.4) and The Beatles' "Hey Jude" (No.5). 4.The song also has been included to RadioMafia's list of "Top 500 Songs" and it took place at number 5 5.In 2000 it came second to "Imagine" by John Lennon in a Channel 4 television poll of The 100 Best Number 1s 6. In 1999, the annual "Top 2000" poll commenced to find the best songs ever made, and "Bohemian Rhapsody" has been ranked number one in all but two years (2005 and 2010 when it was number two) And so on, and so on But I would like to bring up the point of the title of this debate, "Can Bohemian Rhapsody be considered the Greatest song of all time", Can is a key word, Can it be considered not is it the greatest song of time, meaning lets just say you made a list of the top 10 songs at least in the century that can be considered the greatest, could it be on that list? And please sir do not use statistics to argue a point about music, I actually welcome you to discuss your opinion of the greatest song ever. Also if you are interested in statistics perhaps you could consider the 1.9 billion people that tuned in to see Queen perform at Live Aid on July 13th,1985, or you can just watch the video yourself whichever suits you.