BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Medea is Not Responsible for her Actions

1) I can’t agree with killing your kids as protection it just sounds like they need protecting from you. If she really wanted to protect them she wouldn’t have went on a killing spree. 2) Medea is a serial killer who clearly wasn’t a rational thinker. I don’t believe she was capable of looking at the situation objectively therefore her end decision is one that we couldn’t define. If the though originally crossed her mind how could you say that wasn’t her intension. 3) Even if they weren’t old enough to make the decision, you would have to assume that they wouldn’t want to die they were innocent the only guilty party was their mother. 4) I agree with this point 5) It wasn’t quite the accomplishment because all these emotions still lead her to the grim decision in the end. Killing you kids out of “love” could never be a accomplishment. 6) Even if her thought process lead her to believe that she wasn’t doing it to punish her husband in the back of her mind she had to know that doing this would in fact be a form of punishment to the man that betrayed her and her family. 7) I cant argue that she would win a insanity plea because clearly she wasn’t right in the head but you are still responsible for your own actions and it seems like you are trying to put her decisions off on something else.
Medea is Not Responsible for her Actions

1) I think Medea is the real enemy in this story because even though to her its not premeditated murder doesn’t mean that it’s not in the end-premeditated murder. She is thinking and plotting about killing her kids because her feelings are hurt which is sick. Who is going to protect the children from her? It sounds like what she is planning is worse than what she is trying to “protect” them from. 2) It was trivial; Medea and her children got abandon by their father and her husband. She didn’t agree with what he did so she came up with killing herself and their kids as payback. In today’s day and age this happens all the time, fathers abandon their families and leave the mother to fend for them self all the time. I’m happy that my mother didn’t take the route that Medea did because I wouldn’t be here. This just showed how weak minded she was death should never be an option. Be honest with the kids and let them know what really happen. In the end it would make them that much tougher because life isn’t easy so why not get them prepared early instead of killing them. 3) I totally agree with this point the parents do have their own life. But you failed to mention the fact that the kids also have their own life and should be able to choose if they want to live it or not. Just because she helped bring them into the world doesn’t mean she can take them out as well. 4) I can argue that maybe the kids would have had a better life with the father if Medea did just take her own life. Now they would have had more money and better opportunities seeing that he did marry the daughter of a king. 5) I think you may be giving her to much credit in her decision-making. Just because she can go through all the deferent scenarios doesn’t make all of those options Ludacris. She seems to be a little self absorbed feeling like she is the most important person in the world. 6) Medea should of thought about her kids who she “loved so much” before she decided to do what she did knowing that there would be ramification for her actions instead of letting her hurt feelings cloud her judgment. 7) By trying to pin the blame on him would be irresponsible on your behalf you can influence someone to do something but they still have to carry out the action in the end. You can’t blame someone for another person’s bad decision making.
Medea is Not Responsible for her Actions

1) If only Medea really did see innocents when she looked into the eyes of her children maybe there lives would be speared. But her saying “why do you gaze at me with your eyes children” and to also have the thought in the back of her mind premeditated murder was appalling to me. How can you look into the eyes of something you created and think about killing them for no logical reason? 2) Her killing herself over her husband doing something that she didn’t agree with first off is irrational. And someone who sees logic in doing this act may not be a fit parent to begin with. Yes her killing her self would definitely hurt the kids because their mom is not longer with them but as they say time heals all wounds and its something her kids can eventually come to terms with and try and move on from. 3) Her bearing the sharp pains of childbirth and raising these kids to be smart and loving should alone be enough for her not to have these suicidal thoughts and want to be around to see what they grow up to be even if she will not be the only women in there lives form then on. 4) In Medea’s eyes her husband was the enemy because of what he did to her and that’s understandable, but to her kids he was their loving father who didn’t bring harm to them. So who makes her the judge and jury on weather someone should die or not. What credentials does she hold that would leave her to believe these decisions of life and death could be in her hands? 5) If someone goes through all these other options and different scenarios of what they can do in a situation and comes up with death to all as the best one clearly is mentally unstable and not fit to be making such decisions. 6) Medea is clearly trying to play God, which is wrong as they say “hell has no fury like a women scorned” and clearly she is a woman scorned and is taking her anger out on everyone around her. She is trying to hurt her husband like he did her and this is the only way she believes she can. She is willing to put the blood of her kids on her hands just to bring pain to another, which in no way is justified. 7) So therefore Medea is responsible for her actions because if she isn’t then who is?
atheism is disbelief not non belief

Check it. I smoke joints wide with weed. Now, that gives me opportunity for mental elevation. It take stimulation for revelation.Alright withit.Now you say atheism is disbelief.You wrong muthafukka.Atheism mean no god. A is Greek for nah.Theos is Greek for god.Those Greek peckerwoods liked to play with they philosophies. Atheists believe in nah-to-god.That cuz they trump-up a wall in they dammed mind. They need mental stimulation.
atheism is disbelief not non belief

Alright. Yous a dum muthafukka. But I'm gonna help yo sorry azz.God put his self all through contemplative vibrations. Now, you drag yo mind cross the floor, hell nah.Ya can't find God like that.You gots to jump yo dammed mind upwards into the waves of higher perception.Check it. You go flap'n yo gums in the hood, say'n God ain't for realz.BAM! Yo azz just got whooped. Why? Cuz reality just check'd ya.
Albert Wesker Vs

1.) "We'll i. Sorry for my lack of using a sentence opponent"There is no need of apologizing. :)2.) "now let me specify why Chris Killed Wesker . Albert Wesker hates Chris for delaying his plans . While he could have killed him so many times you see in that video that Wesker had multiple chances to kill him but choses not to . You clearly see him pointing a gun at him in the dead but yet he clergy just keeps gloating and that gives him the time he needs to escape . He wants to make Chris suffer and see how he failed to save anyone . Let's say that to make this debate fair we ignore that they met before in the past that they never new each other that the only reason they fight is to stop one of each other's plan . Well with that Wesker has no emotional attachment to Chris he will not win because wesker would see him as a threat to his goals . So wesker would goi at him full strength and not even give his opponent a chance to even see it coming he will die before Chris has any chance to fight back by a simple jab to the heart killing him or breaking his neck . So I wish that my opponent can remove the history to make this debate fair and so that Chris no wesker know who the other is ."Unfortunately, the resolution cannot be changed. You should have specified, during your first speech. Because you didn't speify during your first speech, we must proceed with the same resolution. The resolution is still "Albert Wesker vs Chris Redfield." Albert Wesker might seem overpowered, but Chris already him in a battle. Chris is SUPPOSED to kill Wesker. Additionally, even if Chris didn't know Wesker, in the first place, Chris would still win. Since you, as my opponent, didn't specify the resolution, I assume that Chris can have any weapon he wants to have. With RPG-7, Chris can easily demolish Wesker, like what he did during Resident 5.Once again, my oppenent dropped all my arguments. For all these reasons, please vote for the negative side of this debate. Thank you.
Albert Wesker Vs

We'll i. Sorry for my lack of using a sentence opponent now let me specify why Chris Killed Wesker . Albert Wesker hates Chris for delaying his plans . While he could have killed him so many times you see in that video that Wesker had multiple chances to kill him but choses not to . You clearly see him pointing a gun at him in the dead but yet he clergy just keeps gloating and that gives him the time he needs to escape . He wants to make Chris suffer and see how he failed to save anyone . Let's say that to make this debate fair we ignore that they met before in the past that they never new each other that the only reason they fight is to stop one of each other's plan . Well with that Wesker has no emotional attachment to Chris he will not win because wesker would see him as a threat to his goals . So wesker would goi at him full strength and not even give his opponent a chance to even see it coming he will die before Chris has any chance to fight back by a simple jab to the heart killing him or breaking his neck .
Albert Wesker Vs

Thanks for the response.Now, I'd to refute against your arguments.1.) "Okay here's the links that I hate so mcuh (much) those last ones https://m.youtube.com...;Thanks for the correct link. Unfortunately, this doesn't show how Albert Wesker would directly defeat and kill Chris Redfield. Thus, this video is invalid. Chris Redfield already defeated and killed Wesker.2.) "Okay hers a simple reason Chris killed Albert Weskeer he hates Chris and wanted to make him suffer ."First of all, this sentence doesn't make sense grammaratically. Here, I made some changes: "Okay. Here's a simple reason why Chris killed Albert Wesker. He hates Chris and wanted to make him suffer."Second, this explaination just doesn't make sense: Albert Wesker was killed by Chris because he wanted to make Chris suffer? Wesker was actually killed by Chris in a fair match. Because Chris already defeated Wesker, an abnormal, overpowered monster (human), with a rocket launcer (RPG-7), Chris won the battle. Period. 3.) "He could have killed Chris so many times yet he chose to make him suffer and torment him." Hmm... Is that how Wesker was killed by Chris? (*Sarcasm*) :)4.) "Also if you are brining Chris Redfeild I must add something to this debate that they never new each other in the past and that they nerve were team mates so try to make Chris win when. He is put up to a foe he knows nothing about"You cannot add anything new to this debate. The resolution is still Albert Wesker Vs. Chris Redfield. Chris already won the battle. Thus, I win. Conclusion:Judge, my opponent dropped all of my arguments, which means that he agrees with me. For all these reasons, please vote for the negative side of this debate. Thank you.
Albert Wesker Vs

Okay here's the links that I hate so mcuh those last ones https://m.youtube.com... www.youtube.com/watch?v=MztXNdpLjg0 Okay hers a simple reason Chris killed Albert Weskeer he hates Chris and wanted to make him suffer . He could have killed Chris so many times yet he chose to make him suffer and torment him . Also if you are brining Chris Redfeild I must add something to this debate that they never new each other in the past and that they nerve were team mates so try to make Chris win when. He is put up to a foe he knows nothing about
Albert Wesker Vs

Thanks for your wonderful speech. First, I'd to explain why Chris Redfield would defeat Albert Wesker. (I'm going to keep it short.)C1: Chris Redfield already killed Wesker during Resident Evil 5. Although Wesker might seem overpowered, Chris had already defeated him during Resident Evil 5 (Game). Resident Evil 5 made it so that Chris would eventually kill the antagonist of this game: Albert Wesker. According to Resident Evil Wiki (This wikipage was created by the creators of Resident Evil), "However, Chris fired a pair of RPG-7 rockets at him as he SCREAMED IN RAGE AND PAIN, DESTROYING HIM COMPLETELY." This was how Alex Wesker died. He was killed by Chris Redfield.C2: Albert Wesker is already dead. Like I mentioned, Wesker was killed by Chris. Even IF he resurrects from the dead, Chris would once again defeat him because the main character never dies. :) Additionally, the game creators made it so that Chris would kill Wesker.Moving on to my refutations. I'd like to first point out that his "sources" are invalid.When I attempted to press the links that he provided, this popped up:https://www.youtube.com...The home page of Youtube.He tries to relate his arguments with his "source." Unfortunately, his sources are invalid because we don't know what video he is talking about.Additionally, throughout his whole speech, he basically talks about how overpowered Albert Wesker is.The resolution isn't about who is more physically powerful. The resolution is actually about who would win in a fight, Alex Wesker or Chris Redfield. (According to Oxford Dictionaries, Versus is defined as against.)Because I have successfully proven to you (the judges) how Chris would beat Wesker in a fight, you ought to vote for the Negative. Thank you.Sources:http://residentevil.wikia.com...http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...
Albert Wesker Vs

https://m.youtube.com...... In this video you clearly see that he is running so fast that he seems to be tell spotting . You can also see that he is clearly able to fight to armed men and still unarmed able to beat them while dodging bullets aimed at him . https://m.youtube.com...... In this video you can clearly see wesker dodging bullets at point blank range and the ability to backflip while he still doges them . https://m.youtube.com...... As you clearly see after Albert Wesker is injected by the serum 1 time he still has super human abilities which is shown y when he hits a metal wall and it is seen clearly bending and after 2 injections you can clearly see he is till stringer then an an average human quite stronger even in he's weaker forms . You can also clearly see that Wesker was stabbed by a knife with no affect to him once ever and that is in his weaker form and still after the 2 injection he is still string enough to brake metal when he tries to stop Chris and misses he is shown braking the metal . While yes he might be weaker by the first injection you can clearly see that he is still able to doge bullets without effort . https://m.youtube.com...... In this video you can clearly see that Albert Wesler has the ability to pierce a human being with agin little effort . While I must say Albert Wesker only has one true weakness I see one weakness in Bruce lee that all humans they get tired eventually which is not the case in Albert Wesker . Report this Argument
The Best Quarterback in the NFL

Thank you for setting up this debate and I hope we have a good debate. In the first round ill state some reasons why I think Drew Brees isn't the best quarterback in the NFL. 1.Interceptions: Drew Brees has 18 interceptions this year which is the most in the league. Get this He's tied with Andrew Luck the rookie fomost interceptions. How could you be the best QB if your tied with a rookie? 2. QB rating: This year Drew Brees QB rating has dropped significantly from 110.6 to 93.1. Not that a 93.1 is bad but it shows that Drew Brees is struggling. 3. You say he's the best QB in the NFL but what about Peyton Manning who has broken many records and is a future hall of famer. Peyton is older but still has a better QB rating than Brees with a 103.5. He also has just 10 interceptions. I await pros argument http://sports.yahoo.com... http://sports.yahoo.com... http://sports.yahoo.com...
Each of the Ten Commandments is either unnecessary or incomplete.

THE PROPOSITIONThe full proposition that I will be defending is as follows: "Each of the Ten Commandments (as listed in the King James' Version of the Bible) is either unnecessary or incomplete for morally governing the lives of everyone." If my opponent can convince the audience that just one of the Ten Commandments is complete and necessary for every moral person to follow throughout each of their lives, he/she wins.DEFINITIONSUnnecessary: not needed.Incomplete: lacking something necessary or important.Morally: for the betterment or sustainment of well-being.Everyone: every person who exists.THE TEN COMMANDMENTS1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them.3. Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain.4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates.5. Honour thy father and thy mother.6. Thou shalt not kill.7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.8. Thou shalt not steal.9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is thy neighbor's.THE DEBATE STRUCTURERound one is reserved for acceptance only.For round two, I will present my cases against each of the commandments, and then we'll naturally take it from there. The structure is fairly loose on this one.I thank my future opponent and the viewers for making this debate possible, and am looking forward to it.SIDE NOTEMaikuru said he was disappointed that my opponent in the last one forfeited all of his rounds (as was I), so I'm remaking it for you. Let's finish it this time.
Link (Pro) vs Super Mario (Con)

I have no idea why this guy is still trying, he needs to find a new hobby Reading his lines are almost as bad as listening to that fukin fairy navi. LISTEN LISTEN LISTEN, Is all that btch use to say It is hard to believe hearing this guy rap is almost just as gay See I am an MC, I can do a whole lot more than just spit rhymes I have this nifty ocarina, that can let me turn back time See Even if I fuk up the past is in the palm of my hand, and it will always see me through That means now matter how much you try, I will always be ten steps ahead of you You brought it up so just look at super smash bros, that is a third party game The only thing you have is a uppercut, that is the definition of lame I can spin, slash, and stab all in the blink of an eye Hit you with my hook and knock you up the sky After your floating in the air, you probably would think it is through Guess again btch, because I am about to spin right through you Once I am above you I will knock you to the ground Then angle my sword downward for one final ground pound See Mario, I can even beat you in another game How do you even think we are on the same level, are you fukin insane. The weakest Link did you actually think that line was tight? Ill have peach calling me daddy by the end of tonight Nintendo"s mistake, what was that line about? I am the king of a franchise, go ahead and pout You may be original, but you are the opposite of new Almost every kid today, hates the thought of looking at you You say my bars are transparent, crystal clear, and possibly see through Why go into a timed match that has rebuttals, if you have no idea what do We have been at this for over an hour and yet you have to flip a line I may be a Mascot but your btch sucked my dick for a dime This battle is over and it is finished, it is through Now ask your self whose lines are see through? This guy spewed out nothing but garbage in this past round I will stick my sword through your chest and stick you ten feet in the ground.
Link (Pro) vs Super Mario (Con)

Hey! Listen! Navi wants to speak: Your bars are sh'it and your rhythm is weak I should have known that your quality would sink I'm sorry to say you're the weakest Link Your rap was crap and filled with baseless claims My name is plastered on dozens of games Yeah I'm a plumber but we all start small You had to beg me to be in Smash Bros. Brawl My games outsell yours time and again Just take a look on IGN It's almost cute that you think you're great When your franchise is in a fkin state If I'm outdated then what the hell are you? Dungeons and Dragons came out in '72 I'm original and you're a cheap-azz clone Just a whiny kid that loves to moan What are you except for Nintendo's mistake? Your games are more repetitive than Nokia's 'Snake' I've had more fun chasing fkin Donkey Kong Than listening to your ocarina song Give up little boy and go back to cutting grass Your bars are more see-through than mother-fkin glass I don't know what's worse, you or your whore A cross-dressing slag with vaginal sores Who's the mascot at the end of the day? Who wears tights and is clearly gay? I'm not even against your sexuality, But fkin Sheik is almost bestiality. You cannot spit and we've just proven it All your bars are complete bullsh'it Leave the rapping to the absolute best Stick to what you do, open some chest Now run along and tell all your friends 'VOTE FOR ME BEFORE THIS ENDS!' But there's obviously no contest here Super Mario smells your fear.
Link (Pro) vs Super Mario (Con)

The call me Link, I own the land hyrule The verses that I spit are going to make this fat plumber drool You are one of the Pillars of Gaming, so most people don"t even bother But I am about to turn into Luke Skywalker, I am about to kill my own father You are old school and you are all washed up This is the dawn of a new day, I am unmask this ugly fuk I have a sword and shield that both are considered legendary Your shoot fireball out your azz, how is that sht even scary. See you can say you made modern games, and that you are grade A class act But the student always surpasses the teacher, history shows us that"s a fact As time passes on and new ages come and go People flock to hyrule and forget about poor ole Mario. You have hundreds of sequels, that no wants to play You are like an old grandpa, never letting go of the glory days You beat fire breathing dragons? Are you actually referring to bowser? You beat a dinosaur that looks like a turtle, how can you even call that power Sure I have a vow of silence, and it is kind of fly The moral of the story is, you got out rapped by a mute guy You say you are on high on shrooms and like to fuk your wife? How is that even possible, when bowser is boning her night Almost every single game you try and get back How can you fuk her when you never have even seen her azz I think it is time, I finally teach this jackazz how to behave It is fitting he is a plumber he can dig his on grave I pulled the sword from the stone, just like king author in times past I am going to block his fireballs, and put a burning arrow in his azz See now he is wishing he was me and that he could actually rhyme Btch you couldn"t even win this battle if Zelda played the song of time. You are dogging me because my girl is on the title of my game There is a woman behind every great man, Why would I be ashame? You even went as far, to try and make fun of my horse Btch for that I am going to slash you three times, you can call it tr-force You have the mushroom kingdom and actually think that sht is cool I hail from the lands of demons and dragons, you can call it hyrule This battle is over before it ended, it is really quite sad Just like the game he is in, Mario was nothing but a Fad