Single sex education system is better than a co-ed system.

I hope it will be exciting and amusing for both of us. I admire his ability to take this debate up in spite of his actual beliefs. I deeply believe that my English deficiency won't spoil this debate. IntroductionI will prove my claims in the same order like my opponent presented them. My assignment is to counter "Single Sex Education System is Better Than a Co-ed System". I agree with all definition which my opponent has presented. Contention 1I have got through your sources you provided and the whole text you wrote. Your main statement is that Coed education provides for too many distractions in school which I don't agree at all. I bring quotation from article you provided: "The level of distraction that students may experience from being in class with the opposite sex does not typically come into play until they are older. "[1]. Thus students aren't distracted until they reach puberty (age around 12-13). So your claim should be restricted to high-school students otherwise your claim appears to be irrelevant. For my another statement I would like to attach another quotation here: "There are many students, who maintain their social connections and still are able to concentrate in a coed school, it really just depends on the individual child. "[1]. So in general the distraction in Co-ed schools depends on individuals. Some are able to resist and focus on education and some yield to it. Even though the distraction cause some damage the problem to adjust to a co-ed work atmosphere after students graduate is much harder[2]. Therefore I consider taking co-ed school as better choice for student who has determination to study. Contention 2:I admit that Pro brought a very strong evidence and formulated his argument straightforward. But luckily I have dug out a proof which refute his argument fully. My opponent brought evidence which proof that Single-Sex schools perform better than co-ed. I totally agree but these schools tend to be more academically rigorous, and the students who attend them are strong learners already. As you can see Pro didn't bring evidence WHY it is like it is. The problem is hidden in the students as individual[3]. The students choose those school just for reason that single-sex schools are more serious, difficult, and wealthier. Thus they tuition is much bigger. But this schools don't give a student an experience in field of working with opposite-sex. This only co-ed schools can provide. Contention 3:This argument is slightly confusing and not-clear. Female teachers don't make the difference between Co-ed and Single-sex schools because of simple reason. Logically, the ratio should be same on both schools. The point that most of teachers and administration are females doesn't support the idea why single-sex schools are better than Co-ed. Moreover, It isn't reason why girls study better than boys. And this claim is false. Because boys are better in mathematics[4]. Thus the claim that boys have problem paying attention in class aren't girls but other issues. So your whole argument. seems invalid since the problem of worse grades isn't settled in opposite-sex but in lack of interest in class from side of boys. ConclusionIn the lines above I have put some my arguments. I've summarized that Single-sex school aren't better than co-ed and co-ed schools prepare students to work together and be accustomed to each other. This is one of the biggest disadvantages when student of single-sex school graduate. Thank you for your attention I hope you liked my arguments. Bublifuk[1]. http://www.newyorkschools.com...[2]http://www.universitylanguage.com...[3]http://io9.com...[4]http://www.spring.org.uk...