Can a human truly be liberated from their ego

My opponent claims that a human mind is not void of ego during a state of unconsciousness. Rebuttal: "With this discussion, we are dealing with a humans mental state and not the physical state. With that said, for a human to be freed or liberated, the subject would need to be aware of this process. In an unconscious state, there would be an unawareness of any such state. Even if it was ascertainable!" -Jation One does not necessarily have to be aware of freedom in order to be free. free: "not united with, attached to, combined with, or mixed with something else" -Merriam Webster ego : B. the "I" or self of any person; a person as thinking, feeling, and willing, and distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from objects of its thought. If a human is not united, attached, combined, or mixed with their ego when they are asleep, then a human is free from their ego, even though a human may not be aware of their freedom of their ego. Therefore a human being in a state of conciousness is not a prerequisite for a human to be liberated from their ego. "If a human was considered to have any mental condition, e.g., mentally insane, Schizophrenic, ADHD, etc., the human would be still regarded as such during a state of unconsciousness. This same principle follow with the attachment of the brains ego" -Jation A human's mental condition/disorder and ego are two different things. Mental disorder : "a mental or bodily condition marked primarily by sufficient disorganization of personality, mind, and emotions to seriously impair the normal psychological functioning of the individual"called also mental illness" -Merriam W. Ego: B. the "I" or self of any person; a person as thinking, feeling, and willing, and distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from objects of its thought. A mental disorder is a disorder of the mind. With this disorder significantly impairing someone's mind, it will be hard to be liberated from it while in an unconscious state. Ego, however, is a sense of self. When someone is unconscious, a person does not have a sense of self. Therefore when a human is unconsious a human does not have an ego, and thus a human is liberated from his or her own ego. "Furthering my argument, this can be illustrated to be invalid by his own sources, referring to Freud's model of the psyche. For the unconscious mind, while not aware is certainly active with an egoic entity" -Jation . The above statement about my own sources proving me wrong is false. As the contender (pro), it is my job to rebut the statement's of my opponent, the instigator (con) The statements of my oppenent included two different definitions of the word ego: A. Psychoanalysis . the part of the psychic apparatus that experiences and reacts to the outside world and thus mediates between the primitive drives of the id and the demands of the social and physical environment. B. the "I" or self of any person; a person as thinking, feeling, and willing, and distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from objects of its thought. The first definition of ego was ego as defined by Frued's psychoanayltic theory while the second definition of ego was ego defined in its more common form. Since two different definitions of ego were used by my oponent I defended the statement that "a human can be truly be liberated from their ego" using both definitions, seperating them into two distinct arguments. My opponent, however, used these seperate arguments in order to further his case that an unconsious person cannot "turly be liberated from their ego" when these seperate arguments were never intended to be mixed together. (I appologize if this seperation was not clear to you, Jation) This unintended mixing of arguments caused my opponent to fail to rebut my statement that: "In order to truly be liberated from one's ego, one would have to stop mediatating between the pure instinct of the id and the morality of the super-ego. One can do this by surrendering oneself to either their desires or their morals, ignoring a compromise between instant gratification and doing the right thing." Because of this failure of rebutal on my opponent's part, I assume that this argument is valid and remains unchallenged. Furthermore, while Frued's theory was highly influencial in advancing the field of psychology into the modern age, it was fundamently flawed. This fundamental flaw was that Frued's theory had little scientific basis. "Freud's theory is good at explaining but not a predicting behavior (which is one of the goals of science). For this reasons Freud's theory is unfalsifiable - it can neither be proved true or refuted. For example, the unconscious mind is difficult to test and measure objectively. Overall, Freud's theory is highly unscientific." -McLeod, S. A. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org... (From the Critical Evalutation section) Since Frued's theory is highly unscientific, it is reasonable if a rational human being dismisses Frued's ideas. Thus I will dismiss Frued's theory on the id, ego, and superego for the argument, as it is not only unscientific, but it was never intended to be part of the same argument. In conclusion I have defended the premise that a human can be truly liberated from their ego if they are unconscious. I have supported this premise by the following statements: 1) If a human is not united, attached, combined, or mixed with their ego when they are asleep, then a human is free from their ego, even though a human may not be aware of their freedom of their ego. Therefore a human being in a state of conciousness is not a prerequisite for a human to be liberated from their ego. 2) A mental disorder is a disorder of the mind. With this disorder significantly impairing someone's mind, it will be hard to be liberated from it while in an unconscious state. Ego, however, is a sense of self. When someone is unconscious, a person does not have a sense of self. Therefore when a human is unconsious a human does not have an ego, and thus a human is liberated from his or her own ego. 3)Since Frued's theory is highly unscientific, it is reasonable if a rational human being dismisses Frued's ideas. Thus I will dismiss Frued's theory on the id, ego, and superego for the argument, as it is not only unscientific, but it was never intended to be part of the same argument. Since I have defended the premise that a human can truly be liberated from their ego my main argument still stands. Definitions: Sleep is defined as "the natural state of rest during which your eyes are closed and you become unconscious" -Merriam W. Unconsciouness is defined as: " a : not knowing or perceiving : not aware b : free from self-awareness" -Merriam Webster Ego is defined as: the "I" or self of any person; a person as thinking, feeling, and willing, and distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from objects of its thought. Self is defined as: the ego; that which knows, remembers, desires, suffers, etc., as contrasted with that known, remembered, etc. Free is defined as: "not united with, attached to, combined with, or mixed with something else" -Merriam Webster When a human is truly asleep, a human is truly unconscious When a human is truly unconscious, a human is truly free from self awareness When a human is truly free from self awareness, a human is truly not self aware. When a human is truly not self aware, a human is truly not disguisinged from the selves of others and from the objects of his or her own thought. When a human is truly not disguished from the selves of others and from the objects of its thought, a human truly does not have an ego. When a human does not truly have an ego, a human is truly liberated from their ego. Therefore when a human is truly asleep (or truly unconscious), a human can be truly be liberated from their ego. Thus a human can truly be liberated from their ego (by being unconcious)