only now is true, now is matter

IntroductionMy opponent has still failed to provide any coherent, organized, or well-evidenced arguments. Once more, if my opponent would like to continue this debate seriously, I ask him to start trying harder to make his arguments more understandable. Thanks!Definitionsonly - adverb - without others or anything further; alone; solely; exclusively:now - adverb - at the present time or moment:true - adjective - being in accordance with the actual state or conditions; conforming toreality or fact; not false:matter - noun - the substance or substances of which any physical object consists or iscomposed:information - noun - knowledge communicated or received concerning a particular fact orcircumstance; news:knowledge - noun - acquaintance with facts, truths, or principles, as from study orinvestigation; general erudition:real - adjective - existing or occurring as fact; actual rather than imaginary, ideal, orfictitious:fact - noun - something that actually exists; reality; truth:memory - noun - the act or fact of retaining and recalling impressions, facts, etc.;imagination - noun - the faculty of imagining, or of forming mental images or concepts of what is not actually present to the senses.All definitions gathered from dictionary.reference.com.Rebuttals"facts are in the past, past dosnt matter, now is matter"My opponent has admitted that the past contains facts. Note that according to my definition of a fact, facts are true. Therefore, we can reasonably conclude that the past (as it contains facts) can be true. Thus, my opponent's contention that "only now is true" is negated. fact=knowledge=truth=memory of physical experienceI agree with this semi-coherent claim. Once more, my opponent has admitted that the past contains facts, and as he now says facts are true, we can reasonably conclude that the past can be true."beyond truth and true is false, belief, and know is true"Once more, belief and knowledge are not opposites. One can both know and believe something. For example, I believe and know that I am typing these letters using a keyboard. Therefore, my opponent's contention that knowledge is true and belief is untrue is false."information is the opposite of matter, 0 and 1"My opponent must provide evidence that information and matter are opposites in order to fulfill his Burden of Proof. So far, he has not done so - my opponent's claim is illogical and unreasonable. Furthermore, he is yet to explain the significance of the phrase "0 and 1.""absolute is true even if i can only imagine it, its true that lies exist, but its also true that lies are false"This claim, while seemingly true, is irrelevant to the topic at hand and provides no evidence whatsoever to support my opponent's contention."know=physical experience of now"I agree that knowledge is a physical experience and that it can occur now. However, this does not mean that one cannot know that things from the past are true. For example, I know that it is true that matter did exist in the past. http://www.space.com..."if you look at a rock i have in my hand, do i have to inform you that i have a rock in my hand?"No."only know is true, if its not physical, its not real"For what seems like the billionth time, something can be true/real even if it is not physical. For example, it is true that 5+2=7, even though numbers are not physically tangible."matter being real. the only distance that matters is whats reachable by my physical body, not by my imagination"This debate is not about what "the only distance that matters" is. Therefore, your above claim is irrelevant and not related to whether "only now is true"."imagination is false, opposite of real, true"Imagination is not necessarily false. According to my definition above, imagination is simply the forming of mental images or concepts of what is not present to the senses. I can imagine true things. For example, I can imagine that 5+2=7, even though I can not physically sense this.Conclusion Overall, my opponent has still failed to fulfill his Burden of Proof, as he provides no reasonable/logical evidence or proof for his claims. Meanwhile, I have successfully rebutted each of my opponent's statements. Unless my opponent can defend his statements and provide proof that affirms his contention, I am the winner of this debate.