There exists a scientific miracle in the Qur'an

GREAT DECEPTIONS! No Rule Broken I strongly Condemn Deception being played not only with Me but with Innocent Readers also! Con is trying to Play smart not only with Arabic Language and tried to allege a false claim of Logical errors but also He is trying to deceive people about sentence written in Simple English. Topic was: There exists a scientific miracle in the Qur'an R4: Pro has to only provide one scientific miracle in the Qur'an. No where in these statements make it Obligatory on me that My Argument should only be Restricted to 1 Claim only! It simply says There exists a scientific miracle in Quran and to win this debate Pro has to Provide (at least) one scientific Miracle in Quran! i.e. pro has to prove only 1 Miracle to win this Debate. There is nothing as such stated in R4 that I am "restricted to state only one Claim! and not allowed to write down more than one" Hence this deception should be Strictly taken into consideration to understand Con's Psychology! and His assumption that I broke any rule should be Ignored! It can be seen that Pro's main aim is to Win the voters by Hook or by Crook thus He is trying to deceive with even simplest English! so his lecture on what I did should be ignored to establish Justice according to debate Rules! TRICK BUSTED: Con (though failed) tried to Act smart by demanding single claim at a Time so He can easily refute it by saying that it was already mentioned somewhere in Historical Myth! Since I stated many Scientific Statements its very logical a person can never Plagiarized 100s of Statements from 100s of Myths 100% and Everytime Choose the Correct One! This is still upto Con to Answer How Muhammad PBUH chosen the Right one out of 100s of Myths and everytime accurate? Contentions: Firstly it is Quiet Strange what Con is trying to Convey with his illogical statements such as "Pro has to accept that classical Arabic is almost identical to Standard Arabic, the formal Arabic I speak." I would ask Con on behalf of readers How do we know which Arabic you speak? According to His argument We should Ignore all "41 Translators of Quran in English" and Scores of Other Language Translations and should only listen to him and what he thinks should be the translations... very "Mary-go-Round" I would leave Con to Explain this to us move ahead. Con Claims: I have already won the debate in Round 2 where I demolished Pro's main argument, the "Pharaoh hoax." Is that so? We were not told any that Rule that I am only abide to present One Proof! Instead He Himself claiming that he is an agnostic and would not accept it as evidence, what I present He labled a "Hoax" without citing any evidence of His Claim "Pharaoh hoax was created by Islamist miracle-seekers to convince Christians of converting to Islam." Ignoring all what I presented Con stated an allegation that It is "Texas S.L.F." but If one reads a Short note on this Fallacy(a) you will realize his Trick. (There is not a Single Statement in Quran that says something against "Proven" Science! Its a Challenge to Him to Provide me with "ONE UNSCINETIFIC STATEMENT OF PROVEN SCIENCE" in a New Debate...it would be out of Context here!) Because in spite of there being 100s of Statements which speak about Scientific Facts in Quran revealed in the Arabian Deserts there is not a single statement which says something that is against proven science! that is The Scientific Miracle of Quran No book 1,500 Years ago could speak about 100s of Scientific Statements without any Technology and made not error speaking about them! Con's Strong Deception about Arabic!: C1: This shows how Con is trying to Deceive Non-Arabic Speakers with His Tricks He clearly rejects that the word "Munir" means reflected Light without sufficient proof (1) The Word Munir is from Root word Nor which means Light and it means with light full of light etc. Google Dictionary Perfectly Translates it (2)&(3) Con ignores the fact (Tricks Readers) that in Arabic words are formed by the Roots! and one word can have many meanings I have Illustrated an Example in The Fig. Below form Lecture of Famous Arabic Teacher and Instructor of Classic Arabic You can listen him in English in Short Vid1 http://www.youtube.com...; Hence Munir also can have a lots of Meanings as DICTONARY states (NON-MUSLIM DICTONARY) It should be strongly noted that Con has tried to deceive not only me but Non-Arabic Readers also!C2: Answer is given by Con himself “Many ancient cultures such as Babylonians assumed that the Sun moved around the Earth.” But Quran does not say that unlike Aristotle unlike Babylonians unlike Greeks unlike any other Clearly Quran says every heavenly body is revolving in its own orbit! (21:33) C3: My Arab Native Con again fails to realize that the Verse uses VERB. "The Arabic Word used by Allah is MOUSI'OONA (موسعون expanding) in 51:47, which is a verb of the noun WAASI'A (واسع vast)." Hence he has to believe that it says Universe is Expanding! And Word “Sama” can also have meaning Heaven and Universe. and Quran refers to whole Universe while stating the fact (see Ref#A10) (11) C4: It was my mistake to directly write it sperm due to less space but it also means Diploid cell Zygote “female+male sperms” which formed Fetus in next stages. As from below dictionaries.(4,5) C5: Illogical statements of Con. I did not deny that the Myths were not present in the Past but... Con Fails to Realize that all the Knowledge was "UNPROVEN MYTHS" and without citing single evidence that the knowledge written in Quran "was proved and was scientifically accurate" He makes an assertion: "The "miracles" presented here were meticulously chosen by Muslims because they were based on ancient myths that were accurate…" Con has merely made a point without citing any Evidence about How Muhammad PBUH has plagiarized "ONLY TRUE FACTS" out of 100s of Myths Well this was injust we can see History when was " something Proved to be True" while before that it was one out of 100s of Unproven Myths which were as worst as Habitation on Moon, Sun being Stationary! Rain due to Oceans, Moon was like plain ball, Before converting to Human fetus its an Animal Fetus (Its Aristotle), Geo Centric Earth and +1000 more. Let us assume all knowledge was available somewhere invisible in MYTHS as you cannot deny the fact it was all unproven with 100s of Myths which has proved just recently +1000 Years after Quran and other 100s of Myths are rejected(except the Proven Facts) about phenomenas of Nature! Still unanswered: How can Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) speaks 100s of Scientific Statements about something which is Now Proven to be True more then 1000 Years after His Claim? and what is said is 100% True and accurate. Whereas Bible, Rabbi, Buddha and Others have such absurd concepts which no one will ever acceptI AGAIN CHALLNEGE THERE IS NOT A SINGLE UNSCEINTIFC STATEMENT IN WHOLE QURAN (This will be Our Possibly Next Debate if Con wills since its out of context here) but if we come to those Myth Tellers of Bible and Rabbi and Aristotle we find them filled with 100s of Myths which are PROVEN WRONG TODAY! Hence my Claim of "Mathematical Sciences of Data Analysis (Probability)" Stands unrefuted because no one on earth without a Divine help 1,500 Years ago claim 100 statements about science and they are 100% to be true! C6: P1 & 2 NO EVIDENCE CITED! Instead Non-Muslims Historians write He was “Ummi” surrounded by Spies!(8) C: We have many statements made in Quran which no one could make 100% accurate +1300 years ago and Muhammad was “Ummi” Hence It is a Miracle! C7: P1: Increasing Samples will make My Points More stronger instead of Con’s claim hence not “Limited Sample Fallacy” (9) P2: Con made this point because it is very obvious it cannot be proven in single debate but If He wills we can have separate debate on each Topic I challenge Him. CONCLUSION: Con being Deceived us with ENGLISH, ARABIC and LOGICAL FALLACIES It should be Noted Strictly!Ref: http://debatereferencesforcon.blogspot.com...