God most likely does NOT exist

Argument 1: Rationality Your 1st response wouldn't be labeled as a rebuttal, but rather establishing your resolution. "Is the Universe Eternal?" That is irrelevant to the specific argument presented. 1) "Albert Einstein proved the big bang theory and thus no God" (Your straw-man of my position) As to: 2) Albert Einstein is defending the position that the Big Bang theory (A cosmological theory holding that the universe originated approximately 20 billion years ago from the violent explosion of a very small agglomeration of matter of extremely high density and temperature) is "real" according to your brief presentation of his case. (My actual position) So therefore, your argument is indeed a straw-man, and is indeed not relevant to my particular argument. "had an absolute beginning" However, like I said: "How about God? According to theism, God (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority who was "already there"; the supreme being. So, logically speaking, matter can be a physical substance in general, as distinct from mind and spirit; (in physics) that which occupies space and possesses rest mass, esp. as distinct from energy which was "already there" and energy can be power derived from the utilization of physical or chemical resources, esp. to provide light and heat or to work machines which was "already there"." And: "Also, if God truly did not exist, that doesn't instantly mean that the theory of a tiny, dense ball no larger than a molecule, then matter merging together and exploding, creating a never-ending Universe is confirmed. Maybe the Universe was "already there"." What you also do not realize is that if you claim that something is true (esp. A God who is often conceived as the Supreme Being and principal object of faith. In theism, God is the creator and sustainer of the universe. In deism, God is the creator (but not the sustainer) of the universe. In pantheism, God is the universe itself. Theologians have ascribed a variety of attributes to the many different conceptions of God. Common among these are omniscience (infinite knowledge), omnipotence (unlimited power), omnipresence (present everywhere), omnibenevolence (perfect goodness), divine simplicity, and eternal and necessary existence. Monotheism is the belief in the existence of one God or in the oneness of God. God has also been conceived as being incorporeal (immaterial), a personal being, the source of all moral obligation, and the "greatest conceivable existent". Many notable medieval philosophers and modern philosophers have developed arguments for and against the existence of God), then therefore, the burden of proof is on YOU. It's either I concede that I lose, or I continously refute your arguments. Argument 4: Civilization A mediocre definition of freedom is the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. We have no desire to lose rights. Therefore, that is our basis for freedoms. I would have to drop the rest out, for I choose my final rebuttal/presentation to be inherently superior (Not far beyond). You are freely given the moral authority and obligation to continue rebutting and presenting your case.