The god of the bible does not exist

Naturally my dogmatic opponent It__Is__Me, But who is that really? Neatly avoided everything that was put forward to him in RD2. So therefore, Why should this debate continue when his bible was proven to be fake and fraudulent in which case is the ---ONLY--- outlet that he has to his neanderthal unproven god in which case nobody has ever proven his god to have ever existed in the first place? OK I"ll continue and see what he has to say. It will be the three strike rule plus the original six rules staying intact. Three strikes of miserable made up excuses, As soooo many do, And he will be out and this debate will come to a close INSTANTLY. If my opponent does not like those rules, Tough. He"s the one who ran into a brick wall, Not me. So the question remains" is he ready? "Let"s judge Backwardseden"s third round by the rules he himself set out in his opening challenge:" OK Let"s. Nah nee nah nee boo boo. "Prove that there is only one creator/ god. " Awe well garsh golly, What does my opponent try to do? He uses biblical verses to try to prove his god"s existence. Did he even take the time to watch the video to prove his bible is fake, Fraudulent and for multiple reasons cannot be relied upon? Why no. Of course not. Since he didn"t and relies on his bible, A storybook with his supposed unproven god, Not proved by anybody, Not ever in the history of the human race, I mean wowzsers, Someone wrote something on a piece of paper thousands of years ago that has been interpreted by someone who has transcribed everything that his bible states with hundreds of thousands of different translations with copies upon copies upon copies upon copies etc with dead languages upon dead languages that die off and within these translations and copies these messages are so garbled and different from one another that they become lost. "1 Timothy 2:5, There are plenty of others I could have chosen - for example Ephesians 4:6, Deuteronomy 4:35, Nehemiah 9:6, 1 Chronicles 17:20 to name just a few)" So I guess that my opponent MUST think they are true just because someone wrote them down and translated them into English oh from who knows how many generations and copies up until now with a 0% chance that any of them had any chance that there was a possibility for any of them to be translated and copied from the original because nobody knows if an original exists. Now suppose that there is an original found and thus translations do exist from it? So? Who interprets it so that everybody understands it and gets the same exact message from copy to copy and translation to translation? Well that"s a true impossibility. It doesn"t even exist within English translations and copies. Here's only a few examples: * In the Bishop"s bible, The one before the KJV, The word "Tyrant" was used I don"t know how many times (its at least 400 from what completed records show) and then in the KJV that was replaced by "King". WHAT? Tyrant and KIng are two different and totally apples and oranges with each having totally different meanings. * In Isaiah 45:7 KJV "I form the light, And create darkness: I make peace, And create evil: I the Lord do all these things. " In the NIV version its "I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, The Lord, Do all these things. " In the NLT its "I create the light and make the darkness. I send good times and bad times. I, The Lord, Am the one who does these things. In the ESV "I form light and create darkness; I make well-being and create calamity;I am the Lord, Who does all these things. " The words "evil" and "disaster" and "bad" and "calamity" are completely 4 completely different words that have 0% of nothing to do with each other and completely change the meaning of the verses. With each different verse, The messages are completely different. The synonyms of each word don"t even match. * Proverbs 15:24 KJV "The way of life is above to the wise, That he may depart from hell beneath. " NIV "The path of life leads upward for the prudent to keep them from going down to the realm of the dead. " NLT "The path of life leads upward for the wise; they leave the grave behind. "Now what do those very same verses and thus their translations have ANYTHING to do with each other? That"s strike 1. Moving on. "Backwardseden seems to think that describing Jesus as a mediator contradicts the Old Testament. " Well YOUR jesus was a false prophet. There are several reasons for this. One is mainly because he broke your god"s laws such as working on the sabbath in which required death. The law Exodus 31:14, And Numbers 15: 32-36, And your jesus in which you cannot even prove has ever existed broke that law Matthew 12:1. Here"s some videos to help you about your sneezerag christ. If you do not watch and take in/ comprehend these videos it means you are unwilling to accept evidence which means you are unwilling to debate which means don't talk to me further. http://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=6lqC8fvIspY - jesus wasn"t jesus http://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=KXAGpCTiGlQ - The True Core of the jesus Myth http://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=apS_679ru50 - Did jesus Exist? http://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=9AzwJ9d4i1g - Why christianity is Unreasonable http://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=x-slAgzJmdU - Why Does Every Intelligent christian disobey jesus? http://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=AJMd5UiTeys - Biggest Lie - The fourth gospel ("The first striking revision in the 4th gospel is that the ministry of jesus has ballooned out from from one year to three. The writers not only make a reference not only from one but to three distinct passover festivals. Now was this just a tradition that some early christians held to a three year ministry and others to a one year ministry? Can anyone honestly maintain that whole dialogues could be remembered word for word for many decades and yet believers have no common agreement whether these words were said during one year or during three years? ") Um duh. Do you REALLY THINK jesus existed? http://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=lDpEeHD54Mo&t=1397s - The Gospel According to Carrier (Richard Carrier states jesus may have possibly existed, But scrap all the mythology) Now you directly stated according to YOUR bible "The Bible clearly states that God exists ("For there is one God, And there is one mediator between God and men, The man Christ Jesus" 1 Timothy 2:5)" So that verse clearly without question states "And there is one mediator between God and men" ONE MEDIATOR and it has nothing to do with YOUR god. "God spoke to Moses through a burning bush" Well according to 1 Timothy 2:5 that"s a lie as only christ is the "one mediator" between god and men so your god did and does not have the ability to communicate to men according to that verse. So which is it? Ah yes, You as a supposed christian, Don"t worry there is no such a thing as a christian and you are solid proof of that as you pick and choose what you want to believe in, However you wish to believe it, To what suits you best and scrap the rest. Strike 2. Let"s move on to the supposed trinity which does not in any way prove that your god exists. So you only did yourself a disservice by bringing it up. Well as proven above, Your christ is proven to be a false prophet, And probably didn"t even exist in the first place, And suppose he did exist, Most certainly had no supernatural powers of divinity/ divine inspiration. Supposing this christ storybook character did have supernatural powers of divinity/ divine inspiration? Where did he get them from? Your god most certainly did not grant them unto your savior, Not anywhere in your bible. And you"d have to prove it. Chapters and verses only please from your god granting these powers unto your christ. And supposing this is true according to your bible, So? Nothing from the supernatural has ---ever--- been proved by anyone, Not ever, In the history of the human race. Btw, Supposing what you say is true, Then you"d have to prove that all of judaism is false. Why? Because all of judaism does not believe in your christ in which is the very difference between christianity and judaism. So go right ahead and prove all---of---judaism---to---be---false. Oh and darn" let"s add a little spanking to the fisting" KJV "John 5: 16-18 "16 And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, And sought to slay him, Because he had done these things on the sabbath day. 17 But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, And I work. 18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, Because he not only had broken the sabbath, But said also that God was his Father, Making himself equal with God. " Many problems with those verses. 1. 17 So according to jesus, His father, Namely god works on the sabbath. 2. There"s a 0% chance that YOUR god is going to work on the sabbath, NOT ever. Not for any reason. So either 3. Jesus flat out lied thus proving that he is false, The entire NT is false and christianity is false or 4. These verses are misprints in which is the most likely of probabilities in which is supposed to be a perfect book. 5. The entire OT is false which there"s a 0% chance of that if you believe in YOUR god as once again there"s no chance god would ---ever--- work on the sabbath. 6. 18 Notice how jesus himself appoints himself to be equal with god? 7. Again, Where did jesus get the permission from god to do this? 8. Wow. What an egotist. 9. No need to worry. The entire bible screams of god"s superior ego god complex. That"s what the bible is entirely about and nothing else. 10. Again, There"s no proof whatsoever that god and jesus has ---ever--- existed. So you REALLY THINK ANYTHING IS TRUE about the "trinity"? I hope you have a better arsenal should you decide to continue with this debate. Should be strike 3 Am out of space to continue with other subjects since DDO only limits a 10, 000 character limit for each argument Btw, Pay attention to what missmedic stated in his post as he knows A LOT more about god/ religion than you or I BY FAR