Dogs don't have tails.

I thank Con for his rebuttalsI am not proposing that all dogs today have cancer. What I am proposing is a different view of perspective at the world. How do we know what we know? How do we know our knowledge are accurate? The majority of the scientists in the past thought that the Earth was the center of the universe. The majority of the population of mankind thought that the Earth was flat. Those were all proven wrong. Without specifically looking into the dog's tail and identifying it, I believe it could not be confirmed just yet that it's a normal part of the dog. Being able to stand on one side and protecting his or her point of view is an important aspect for someone to be good at debating. However, being open-minded and "not following the majority" is sometimes required. Debates are not to win or lose. It is to share new ideas. According to Albert Einstein, "Imagination is more important than knowledge". I would like to say that I did not admitt that malignant tumors may not be inheritable. What I have said is that it may or may not be inheritable. This, is also yet fully verified. In one sense, tumors can be inheritable. In another sense, they cannot be. One can inherit the predisposition to develop a tumor, but one cannot inherit an acquired tumor itself that has developed in one's parent. And let's remember that dogs have their tails from birth, so they cannot be "predisposed" tumors. This leaves only one possibility: dogs' tails are NOT tumors.In my point of view, this is just a theory told mouth to mouth. It is not confirmed or credited to whoever came up with the theory. I could make up some theory of my own and post on the internet and people would be saying it to someone else, making it "real" in the future. As stated before, not all herbs have been classified, especially ones in the olden days. Herbs have unpredictable effects that humans could not possibly know unless they have seen with their own eyes. People thought cancer could not be cured, until herbs were found. A herb that a dog ate may have caused a new kind of antibodies to be able to generate within the body. It may be a while before these antibodies are produced that the tumors have time to grow. Then it would stop growing when the antibodies are produced. Dogs can control their tails half of the time. The other half of the time, they move on instinct. This may be the effect of the species having the disease (tumors growing on top of each other) for so many generations that the nerves start to grow into the tumors and that the dogs could start controlling the tumors above their butt. As stated before, the tumors may have been with the dogs for so long that it became a part of the dog, growing muscles and bones of its own that are connected to the dog's.Also, a dog has the ability to control the movement of its tail. It is not possible to control the movement of a tumor.Half of the time they have the ability to control the movement of their tails. However, sometimes they do not.Wolves are the older "generations" of dogs. Dogs are tamed wolves taken from the wild. Wolves are like wild stray dogs. In conclusion, dogs don't have tails. They so-called tails are tumors topping on each other. http://dogcare.dailypuppy.com...;