Earth is probably younger than 10,000 years old.

RebuttalTyreYour argument about Tyre is virtually nulified by the existence of tje city of tyre today. You mention that the city of Tyre that exists today is not the same city, it is. Here is a map from a christian theological paper (of ancient Tyre) [1]. And here is a map of the modern city of Tyre [2] as you can see it is in the same place.King CyrusYou say that "Cyrus was actually inspired to fulfill the prophecies by reading them". This is the definition of a self fulfilling prophicy ("(Of an opinion or prediction) bound to be proved correct or to come true as a result of behaviour caused by its being expressed" -Oxford English dictionary). Ezekial and IsaiahThe exact dates of the writings of Ezekial and Isaiah are in dispute [3] but even if I (for sake of argument) accept the dates of Ezekial and Isaiah that is one prophicy out of thousands, most unfulfilled [4][5][6][7] I can go on but I think you get the point. Just because part of one prophicy (which is self fulfilling) came true does not justify the old testament.Helium DiffusionRussell Humphreys's experiments have not been accepted by the majority of the sientific comunity and has recived vast critizism. Kevin Henke describes Russell Humphreys's dating methods as "are based on many false assumptions (isotropic diffusion, constant temperatures over time, etc.) and the vast majority of Humphreys et al.'s critical a, b, andQ/Q0 values that are used in these 'dating' equations are either missing, poorly defined, improperly measured or inaccurate."[8]. The helium problem is not a problem which any mainstream research scientists encounter.Young Solar SystemI was instantly sceptical here when I saw that you needed to site articals by the same man (Russell Humphreys). Again Russell Humphreys's findings have not been accepted by the majority of scientists and here rely on what turned out to be thrust from the spacecraft the readings were taken from [9].Arguments for the earth being over 10,000 years oldDendrochronologyAlso known as tree ring dating, dendrochronology works by matching one section of rings from one tree to another section of rings on another tree. By this method a database of tree rings can be created and this allows reaserchers to trace tree rings back as far as 11,000 years[10].Radiometric DatingRadiometric dating works by comparing two different compounds. For instance in carbon dating works by comparing the stable carbon isotope, carbon 12 to the less stable carbon isotope carbon 14. When an animal dies it boasts the normal ration of carbon 12 to carbon 14 but over time carbon 14 (a radioactive isotope) decays and this rate can be measured [11]. The accuracy of carbon dating is comfirmed by other dating methods (including dendrochronology) and other types of radiometric dating. There are other types of radiometric dating which also work for much older sample (for instance argon-argon).[1] http://tyndalehouse.com...;(see page 2) [2] http://www.mapquest.com...;(I don't think this breaks the rules of not citing layman as I am not taking arguments or information just a map)[3] The Second Isaiah: A New Interpretation by Charles Cutler Torrey[4] Ezekiel 30:10-11[5] Isaiah 7:1-7[6] Isaiah 19:18[7] Isaiah 45:1[8] Young-Earth Creationist Helium Diffusion "Dates", Kevin R. Henke, TalkOrigins Archive[9] Support for the Thermal Origin of the Pioneer Anomaly". Physical Review Letters 108 (241101). June 2012.[10] Dendrochronology. "Science in Archaeology: A Review". AJA 99 (1): 79–142 (1995)[11] Bowman, Radiocarbon Dating, pp. 10–12.