None of the three most practicted religions' Gods exist.

R3 RebuttalsOpponent's arguments in bold and italics. My arguments in plain text."So first off, clarification. Muslims and Christians worship the same God, but have different perspectives of him. The God of Abram/Abraham, who's first son was Ishmael, is the same Allah that Islam prays too. There's different names for him, different interpretations, similarly to Jews and Christians. And then Hinduism practices polytheism, but it's worthy to note that their supreme God is Brahma, the sort of creator of the universe, much like Islam and Christianity's God. So, to make it simpler I'm going to compare the Trinity, Allah, and Brahma all as the same God, the creator, but people just have different opinions on who he actually is." Sounds good, simple is better. "And that's one thing about religion, it is extremely hard to prove that God is real. And the reason for that is because, if we could prove his existence, than their would be no need for faith, and faith is very central to almost all religions." I disagree. Often in biblical texts people knew Jesus was real but still did not have faith in him. There would be plenty of room for faith if we scientifically proved God existed. Faith "3. Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance: keeping faith with one's supporters; refused to break faith with his friends." [1]Think about it, you know certain people exist, but are you loyal to them? Do you trust them? I have shown even if there was as much evidence that God exists as humans exists, faith would be very important. Finally, several religions would inevitably claim God was "their God" if God was proven to exist. In other words, the question would remain of which God?"If one religion could absolutely prove that their God is the real one, everyone would flock to it, be saved or enlightened, and then no more point for religion. Religion thrives on faith (one reason their might not be many miracles nowadays is because if someone filmed a vision of Jesus, everyone would jump on board to Christianity)." No, they wouldn't. People, particularly with strong beliefs against Christianity would think it was a ruse. "The answer to that leads is because God wanted to create them." That is one possible solution. Yet, there is no scientific proof to back that claim up. At best there is anecdotal evidence from religious texts that may have been tampered with, mistranslated, or misinterpreted. Not only that but many creation stories exclude each other. "They didn't create themselves, and if you argue evolution, then the very first organism ever... who created it? Chemical reaction? Who created those chemicals? Ultimately, you will be backed into the corner of that something had to have created them." Perhaps there is no reason nor explanation, that it simply just is. For right now the something from nothing theory seems to be the best answer to the question. The universe has a net energy of nigh zero. Quantum fluctuations could have started the big bang. [2]"A supreme being. Hindus, Christians, and Muslims may view him differently, but nevertheless, there is a creator. " There is no scientific evidence to support that view. "Ask about any thing and why or how it exists, and you will end up with the same result: a God. Try it, it's pretty fun." Something from nothing theory which is backed by evidence is my answer. [2]"Sounds promising, even though that I can easily just ask "Where did the law of gravity come from?"" [3]The multiverse theory explains how the constants of the universe were created. [3]"So, now it's your turn. Disprove that Allah, Brahma, or the Trinity is not extant. Trust me when I say if you can, I will be an atheist from here on out. And I have full confidence that it is impossible to prove God isn't real. But I'm looking forward to your answer, and thanks for reading my paragraphs." Science has explained away most mysteries involving God. There will be some dispute about which way photosynthesis evolved, yet all this dispute reinforces Darwin's theory of evolution. The same goes for other theories, there will always be some level of mystery in the universe. Which version of abiogensis is the correct version? Yet, all these versions reinforce abiogensis.Finally, even if you don't somehow buy the scientific version, there is plenty of other faiths that could defeat your argument. For example Deism and Judaism. Deism is a belief that God created the universe and then disappeared. Since miracles are at best extremely rare, Deism seem much more likely than the three most popular religions. Jewish people reject that Jesus Christ is the son of God. As well as rejecting all other Gods except the Judaism God. If the Judaism God is the one and only true God, then no other Gods that can exist. Conclusions, my opponent has not even dented my case. Science can explain everything my opponent mentioned as well as deism and Judaism. Thanks for the debate. Sources.1. http://www.thefreedictionary.com...2. https://medium.com...3. http://www.space.com...