Men are better than women.

Look, here's what you don't get. Anything. I would love to host a live online moderated or unmoderate debate so that you can actually see how flawed your logic is, and that you won't be able to come up with any logical argument on the spot. You hide behind the keyboard with time to make up your responses, thinking that your responses mean anything significant or even address the arguments at hand. All you do is avoid and come up with bullcrap, if you engaged in a live debate with me you would see how stupid you sound. But we all know you won't do that, because you're a keyboard warrior in the first place. Now all you're doing is reiterating the point you can't understand anything. "Where to begin? First of all, making inferences on my potential future arguments based on a semantic point that simply does not matter, and that I stated did not matter, is ridiculous." Please tell me as to how I made an inference on your arguments. You're the one making the inferences. As I said, "I am more than happy to debate the topic under the premises that I established; not the premises you attempt to establish by forming false and illogical assumptions as to what said premises are, and especialy not when you attempt to represent your misunderstanding of the premises AS MY premises to being with." You still haven't proposed any logical argument to deny that you havn't done this, and yet you're going to throw out that I'm the one making inferences about your arguments! I've already shown how you did this. But of course you don't try to justify with logic as to why you did not actually mistake, you just ignore this completely and start throwing around crap like I'm the one making inferences about your arguments. "I stated right at the start that I was attempting to '...argue that, aside from certain things being literally physically impossible for one gender, for example men giving birth, both genders are quite capable of attaining the same skills and qualities as one another to allow them to excel in whichever area they choose to apply their skills.'" Ok. I don't have a problem with that. You're not being specific as to "certain things being literally physically impossible for one gender, for example men giving birth." This=Biological differences. You know what else that includes? The proven sexual dimorphisms in the anatomical structure and neurochemical make up of the brain, among many others. The male brain IS NOT the same as a female brain. This is just one thing you're excluding by trying to negate the differences that exist in the first place!But based on your flawed logic, I can't use this to support my argument because men and women are different. Do you get what you're saying? That's like trying to say you can try to argue the point that a male lion is better than a female lion, but you can't use any of the differences that are "physically impossible" for the female lion to do or be. So no, obviously I'm not going to be able to debate when you try to impose this crap.In case you want to pull your typical nonsense, you said for the record:"I accept my opponent"s debate premises being the PHYSIOLOGICAL difference between men and women qualifying men as "better" in the sense of making them 'better suited to the survival and technological advancement of the human race'." (Which isn't true, if you've read or paid attention to anything I've said) You also said: "aside from certain things being literally physically impossible for one gender, for example men giving birth, both genders are quite capable of attaining the same skills and qualities as one another to allow them to excel in whichever area they choose to apply their skills." My whole argument has to do with things that are "physically impossible" for one gender. It's certainly not because a man can't give birth. And being that you earlier made the unfounded assumption that; "my opponent was obviously using such biological differences as the main base of his argument, I assumed that this would be the majority part and main qualifier of his argument," why would you attempt to say that whatever biological differences there are, they don't count? Your logic says that, despite that the male brain may be fundamentally different than the female brain, its not possible that these differences account to anything significant, because you say so. That's not for you to determine sweetheart.You think you get to impose additional requirements on the debate topic by saying well, if you ignore whatever differences exist, you can consider men and women to be equal. I'm seriously tired of trying to explain to you what's flawed with your logic. You're just a dumb keyboard warrior with no potential to develop rational thoughts, much less do so on the spot. So I know you'll never actually accept an audio debate. You know that you're stupid. You know that all you're doing is coming up with nonsense and avoiding everything. And thats why you do it all behind the keyboard so that you can manipulate the situation. Act like you're intelligent when all you're doing is misinterpreting things, then lying about it, and then just avoiding any argument presented as to why you misinterpreted. All because you're just "right." You can't think in a rational nor logical manner. Please, entertain myself and the rest of the world by participating in a real debate. You think hiding behind your keyboard is a debate. You're not fooling anyone, atleast anyone intelligent for that mattter.