The Walking Dead Game Season 2: SPOILERS! The player's choice not to shoot Kenny was justified

Rebuttal 1:MY OPPONENT CONCEDED THE FACT THAT JANE KNEW KENNY WOULD TRY TO KILL HER! My main question for you is, if Jane knew Kenny would try to kill her, then why did she go through with her plan? If she knew one of them would die, then why did she go through with it? You totally ignore my reasons that I gave you why Kenny was justified in thinking she killed the baby. Jane could've ended the fight very easily by simply stating "He's alive! " Kenny would've stopped right in his tracks and went to get the baby. My opponent acts like this is all Kenny's fault. However, he totally ignores the fact that when Clem asks her to leave, she says "Not a chance in h***! " He also dropped my previous arguments about her stopping the fight at any time. Jane didn't attack first, but she had every opportunity to end the fight. Now that's just cold. Mike and Bonnie left because of Arvo. I proved Arvo deserved it. There is something that doesn't make sense in your argument. If Jane knew Kenny would try to kill her, then how could she expect Kenny to calm down? She cares for Clem, as it fits into her plan. Here is where I posted it in my arguments. " After spending so much time alone, Jane saw Clem like her younger self with so much potential. She desperately needed someone to keep her sane, and Clem was that person. "End quote. I have to admit, she did risk her life to save Luke and Sarah. However, she constantly bugged Clem about leaving the group with her. She then wanted to leave Sarah behind when the house was getting overrun. She was wrong, because if Clem makes the right choices, Sarah will stay alive (but die later in the episode). Rebuttal 2: Jane has taught Clem some skills, however, this doesn't means she deserves to live more. Explain how she saved the baby. She almost gives up on Sarah instantly once the zombies came in. Here are some more good things Kenny has done. Fixed the R. V in episode three of season one to save the entire group for bandits. Saved Lee's life many times. Almost sacrificed himself to get the walke talke or put Ben out of his misery. Took the blame for the walke talke so Clem didn't get hurt (he lost his eye as a result). As you can see, out of the few things you named for Jane, I have named much more good tings Kenny did in my previous argument and this one. Rebuttal 3:MY OPPONENT CONCEDS SHE DIDN'T CARE IF KENNY LIVED OR DIED! HE ALSO CONCEEDED SHE JUST WANTED WHAT SHE WANTED! Rebuttal to Sub Point:Kenny did this for the better of the group. She was bitten anyways, and they needed the supplies to keep their group alive. Not only his safety, but Lee's, Clem's, Kajaa's, and Duck's! If Lee dies, Clem will have no guardian. Lee keeps her safe through the whole series. I can't see a way where Clem could've lived without him in that time. Kajaa needed Kenny to take care of her and Duck. I would've bet on them to be the first ones to go without Kenny. Also, supplies would've ran very low, causing many people to starve with their already low rations and lose two of their most able group members. So as you can see, Kenny did it for himself and the group. That is a lie if I ever heard one. Since episode four, Jane keeps bugging Clem to leave the group. A famous quote from Jane was "These people aren't going to last long. Don't let them drag you down with them. " Kenny really cared and loved Clem. So, just because she wanted to save Clem the burden of cutting ties, means she's justified in killing Kenny? That makes no sense! Rebuttal 4:Tell me why these are so un-reasonable. I'll grant you that, however, give me three scenarios where Jane would lose the baby. Then she would have blood stains and cuts or skin irritation from falling. Let's try again. She was acting strange. She didn't want to cradle it, touch it, interact with it, she even had a problem with watching the baby. She at least needed to try and act like she cared. You admit Jane is selfish. If it meant her own survival, she would the baby. You have yet to refute that. Actually Kenny gave her a brief window to explain. After Kenny said, "How could you kill a f***ing child? !? !" "Jane simply stated," It was an accident Kenny. " She didn't try to explain herself. She didn't say, "I tripped and there was a walker. " She insisted on not explaining. Dropped arguments:The plan to go to Carver's camp was as risky as going to Wellington. He didn't give me the three scenarios I asked for. Mike left because Arvo. Kenny would get along with good people. Arvo was a threat. All of Pewd's statements. Conceded arguments:He conceded Jane didn't care if Kenny lived or died. He conceded the fact that she knew Kenny would try to kill her. He conceded Jane just did what she wanted. Arguments lacking a good rebuttal:She could've stopped the fight at anytime. I have proved:Kenny deserves to live more than Jane. Kenny had a good reason to suspect Jane of killing the baby. Jane only cared about herself. Now let's link this all together. .. .He conceded that she didn't care if Kenny lived or died, so this would mean she was willing to do anything to him. He also conceded Jane knew he was going to try to kill her. It was also conceded that Jane just does what Jane wants. He barely even trys to refute that she could've stopped the fight at anytime. Piece this together. What does this sound like to you? To me, it sounds like a motive for murder. This makes her sound mentally un-stable. I say she wanted Kenny dead so she could have Clem. She didn't care what the cost. Overall, I'll leave it up to the voters. Go on the facts and see that the player's choice to let Kenny kill Jane is justified. Thank you so much for reading!