Organic food should be administrated in schools

Thanks for the quick reply, CON. Let's start with a refutation.1. More expensive and less quantityPRO's first point was how organic foods are much more expensive than normal foods, also coming in smaller quantities. However, that is an investment that is completely up to the family to choose. This resolution is not forcing students to buy organic, rather, it gives students an option to buy organic and eat healthier. If families wish to spend more to allow their student to eat healthier, that is their choice. However, if families do not wish to spend extra money, or find it too costly, then they are not required to buy organic foods. Therefore, the argument that it is much more expensive is invalid, as families are given a choice as to whether or not they would like to eat organic.2. obesityPRO's next point is that we should not solve obesity through the promotion of organic food, but rather promote sport and excercise, as well as a balanced diet. I would like to point out to PRO that we are already doing this, we are already promoting sport and excercise and balanced diets in schools. We are teaching students about eating healthy, however, obesity rates in children remain high. . http://www.ncsl.org...As a result, it is obvious that this is not working, and we need to take a step further. This can be done through the promotion of organic foods, by allowing students to eat healthier. Like PRO said, obesity is a huge problem that we should take seriously. Therefore, it is only logical that we do everything in our power to solve this issue, and promoting organic foods would only improve the issue, rather than making it worse. As a result, we should promote organic foods to solve obesity.3. educationPRO says: "balanced diet includes small amounts of sugar, fat and salthow do you decide what is healthy and what is not? "I would just like to point out that we already know what foods are healthy or not. Just look at the four food groups. This point does not really add any new information, it just merely adds on to the previous point, about how a failure of education is the result of obesity, how we need to teach students to eat healthier and excercise more. . http://www.childhoodobesityfoundation.ca...We are teaching students to be more active and eat healthier, to try to reduce obesity. However, like I said, that is not working as obesity rates are still high and climbing. Therefore, we must take the next step and administer organic foods in schools. Now moving onto my affirmative case: arguments. Arguments1. The Next StepAs I mentioned, and Pro agrees, obesity is a huge issue. Therefore, as it is still unsolved, we must solve this issue by doing everything in our power. This includes administering and giving the option of buying organic foods in schools. As PRO says obesity is a problem we should take seriously, it does not make any sense to me why we would not impose another solution to the problem by administering organic foods. This would solve the problem, and by not passing this resolution, we are not doing everything in our power to solve the serious problem of obesity, which does not seem logical at all.2. Health defectsBy not giving students the opportunity to eat organic, they would continue and be unaware of healthier options, and continue with their frozen foods and unhealthy options. In fact, normal foods have alot of residue pesticides on them. . http://eap.mcgill.ca...This is obviously unhealthy, and by passing this resolution, we give students the chance to eat healthy through organic foods, which is much better than our current state.