None of the three most practicted religions' Gods exist.

Sorry, I missed that part and jumped right in, but I hope that isn't a big issue. So here is my rebuttal. Science has come a long way in the world, I will agree with you there. Back when events like crop failure and a plague happened, everyone blamed it on a scapegoat witch and killed her. Nowadays we know that events like this are because of specific rain areas (I'm not a meteorologist. ) and viruses, not demons inside innocent people. Science has come a long way to explain the world around us. Let me tell you though: science will never answer the creation question. Theories have been provided, but not answers. This question has been asked for thousands of years, and neither side has been conclusive. Many people will argue that science will provide the answer, it will take time, but it will come through. I'm firm in my belief that it won't. It will remain, and if my words right here can be stored in a database until the world ends, I'm %100 sure that my statement would be true even then. You could say in response that theists will never prove God is real, and that's OK, we won't. That is what faith is for, again. Like I said, proving God is not real is completely impossible. It's what you should be doing in this debate, but it simply won't because you can't. In your next response, I'd like you to give evidence on why he isn't existing. I'll be on your side if you do, believe me. You state "No affirmative proof of God means beyond a reasonable doubt we conclude that God doesn't exist. " I'll use an example here to explain how that statement is false. Now, you may think I'm crazy with this example right here, but here me out. Let's say this quarter, right next to me, is God. Like I said, here me out. There is no evidence that this quarter is God, so you should say that, therefore, this quarter is not God. By definition, at least for Christians, Islam, Judaism (I'm not certain on others), God is all-powerful (supreme, infinite power, does what he wants, can manipulate physics, chemistry, gravity, etc. ), all-knowing (knows everything there can possibly be known) and all-present (is everywhere in the universe) (see Source 1 at the bottom). So, God can manipulate the physics to make himself a quarter (and also manipulate your mind to make you think he isn't), know how to make himself a quarter, and, being everywhere, why COULDN'T he be a quarter? So, to say you can't prove god is real, therefore he isn't, can't work. Because, by definition, Brahma, the Trinity, or Allah, can do anything, even making you not be able to prove it. To say that God is not all powerful, knowing, and present, is perfectly fine, but you and I would not be talking about the same God then. And the God we are discussing, the one from the 3 most practiced religions in the world, is, so this is perfectly possible. I really my quarter example helped out. Don't think of it out of the ordinary, though! We know Catholics believe a wafer of unleavened bread is truly the body of Jesus, and a quarter and a bread wafer show physical similarities! (I'm not saying this US currency beside me is God, but I will not refuse the possibility that it is not him. ) I'd also like to site that anything proven in biology, evolution, psychology, physics, chemistry, astronomy, and many more does not contradict the existence of God. Being all powerful and knowing in the world of science and physics, he can actually MAKE this stuff happen! To say that he can't, as I said before, is not in league with the God that Hindus, Christians, and Muslims worship. Just give me anything that science has discovered, even evolution. Nothing will be contradicting to the existence of a deity. In summary, this powerful being that us theists worship is perfectly capable of making himself unbeknownst to us if he wants (personally, I think he has revealed some already, but that is beside the point. ) To say he doesn't exist simply because he chooses not to reveal himself, which he can do if he wants, is proof, is, well, wrong. You can't be sure. As Dr. Kardaras states, you should be if anything an agnostic. I don't know the official way to add sources, but here's mine, in case your interested. Source (1): . http://study.com...