Noahs ark never happened.

Hello! I will begin my rebuttals now.1. Since all the humans on board where of one race how did new races arise in 4000 thousand years? and 8 people is not enough genetic diversityIt is most likely that the people on Noah's ark were of slightly different genetic makeup at the time of the ark. However, most biblical scholars agree that the races came from the tower of Babel when all the people scatter.This point is not really proving anything - Even evolutionists don't have much of an answer to how the races came about. Although this is still a mystery for both sides, I find it much harder to explain how some apes evolved to be white people and others african americans:). 2. "19The water prevailed more and more upon the earth, so that all the high mountains everywhere under the heavens were covered. 20The water prevailed fifteen cubits higher, and the mountains were covered. 21All flesh that moved on the earth perished, birds and cattle and beasts and every swarming thing that swarms upon the earth, and all mankind;"' So i assume you know Mount everest is the highest mountain in the world ? and since in the Bible it says that water was that high animals would either die because of Lack of Oxygen or because they froze to death.First, there is something that we need to clear. (My point is agreed upon by creationists and evolutionists alike) Before the flood, the world was relatively flat. Even the tallest mountain was only a few miles high. In the Bible, it says that the fountains of the deep opened - This created unrest deep into the earth. As water and other things poured out from underground, it completely changed the face of the earth. In a short span of time, valleys deepened, mountains rose taller and those events created the world we know today. Evolutionists also agree that event like this happened to shape our world but they do not believe that it was the flood. (1)So becuase of this, we can see that the tallest mountain wasn't really that tall. Because of that, the animals could breathe and they wouldn't freeze. 3. There would have to be 50 animals of each kind for there to be enough genetic diversity . there would be severe genetic defects.There isn't any support for this so I don't know what you're talking about. But, according to evolution,we all came from a common ancestor so wouldn't these same rules apply in an even greater sense if this were true?4. If there was only a few thousand pairs of kinds of animals why is there so many species right now estimates show there is roughly about 15 million species of animals so how did that happen in 4000 years.I have one major point: Use of words. In the Bible, it says to take Kinds of animals, not species. Above, you said that there was only a few thousand "kinds" of animals on the ark (Which is correct). However, you then asked how the ark could fit the 15 million "species". Those are two entirely different things. I completely the support the theory of microevolution - Those "kinds" can easily change into different species within that "kind" of animal. For example, A Zebra is a species of horses, which is a kind. (2)5. As the animals left the ark there was no plants and food therefore wouldn't the animals eat each other or just die out.First, most vegetation could survive as seeds. Even though the plants died, the seeds scattered all over and were beggining to grow after the flood. Noah got an olive branch with leaves before they left the ark which meant that an olive tree was alive and growing somewhere. Also, as seen by modern floods, massive sheets of floating vegetation could have supplied food. 6. There would be signs of migrations for example after leaving the ark the kangoro would travel to Australia and we found find fossils on the way. The same arguement applies that I made earlier. The "kinds" of animals would be slowly scattere around the earth, sometimes traveling on the massive sheets of vegetation. The example of the Kangaroo is often used, but there is proof of something like this happening today. We know that bison once inhabited the majority of North America but today they are only in a few areas. Although we know this, very few bison fossils have been found in the places that they once lived. The same thing goes for the kangaroo. Fossilization is a tricky process. (3)7. The Problem of Food and Water , i really dont need to explain much on this one for example 2 elephants would require 365,000 Ibs. Of Food and 36,500 gal. of water , the Girrafes are going to need 54,750 Ibs. of food , the hippos are gone need 65,700 Ibs. of food and the Lions 16,060 Ibs. of Meet and that meet is going to rott , what makes it even more incredible is that in Genesis 6:21 it says 'You are to take every kind of food that is to be eaten and store it away as food for you and for them."It is true that these animals would require a lot of food. There are a few things to keep in mind. First, the animals on the ark were juvenile and therefore didn't require the amount of food of a full grow animal does. Second, these animals were not active. They weren't burning as much energy and therefore didn't require a massive amount of food. Third, most of the food provided was dried and concentrated giving the animlas the necesary nutrients without the space. (4) (5) 8. Most Sea Life would die , Because there would be Changing Water temperature , pressue , salt&fresh water mixing = fish die.I would agree with this. It is evidenced by the fossil record that fish and sea life did die. But the beggining to your question says it all: "Most". Most fish would die. Again, we see fossil evidence from this. Most does not mean all, and as we can see fish are here today. The flood killed "most" fish, not all of them.I have made a rebuttal to each of my opponents case and I await his response!Support:(1) - http://www.icr.org...(2) - http://www.answersingenesis.org...(3) - http://www.answersingenesis.org...(4) - http://www.creationtoday.org...(5) - http://www.answersingenesis.org...The VB script error won't let me go back and check for grammar errors....