John McCain will make a better president than Barack Obama

New Point 1) Obama supports getting rid of No Child Left Behind, which hurts schools and takes good schools and makes them overcrowded and takes funding away from bad schools and makes them even worse. Experience I) Your analogy sounds nice but still never defends itself from my Bush, Cheney example. You do not support George W. Bush, or his ideas, according to your profile. You agree that experience does not qualify you to be preident. And the American people have decided that Barack Obama's ideas outweigh his lack of extensive experience. Obama beat Clinton by almost 300 delegates and she has 40 years of political life. Obama's ideas outweigh Mccain's experience. II) McCain has fought in combat and his father was a marine. He would have military experience except for one fact. McCain was a prisoner during the war and was one of the few Vietnam War supporters after the war because of it. He only survived because his father was influential. III) McCain had a life that was privileged and gives him a limited view. Obama relates to the poor, rich and middle class. IV) Yes. McCain has experienced one, privileged lifestyle. Obama has lived rich, poor, and middle class. Obama was a community organizer, lawyer, editor. McCain was a war fighter. Obama has experienced more in his shorter life. V) I did not drop your military experience point. I said "Obama opposed the Iraq War at the beginning of the war. Obama understands that the Iraq War is hurting our military. John McCain wants to continue this war. A war that you are against according to your profile. " VI) McCain had no leadership experience. He has been a senator and a marine. VII) I did not drop your legislative points. I said "He increased tax credits for low-income workers. .. " VIII) I'm not lying about the debate. Please return the favor. B) Judgment a) These political gotchas are not good reasons to say somebody will be a bad president. Obama's decision to join Wright's church was made when he was running for Illinois office and that is a really big, influential church, good for a politician. McCain has Hagee's bagage who says things like Katrina victims deserved to die. Obama does not agree with Wright's views. It is obvious. He said he does not. And if he does. .. SO WHAT! ? Which he does not! b) I do so say WHY it is the incorrect understanding of the ad! !! Because the phone ad is obviously not about if he can pick up a phone! It is about his judgment and the judgment he would make if something catastrophic happened at 3am! !! And your source did not back up your statement, which you dropped! c) You asked where you claim anything about Illinois legislation! I respond in paragraph 2: "Remember, his opposition came when he was an Illinois STATE SENATOR, where decisions barely matter. " d) Sometimes we do need war! The Iraq War is a useless war! Stay on topic! The debate is the Iraq War! You're dodging my points and lying as a debater. You're ruining this debate because of it! Please actually debate the topic! The Iraq War is a bad war that hurt our public relationships and killed 100,000 Iraqis, cost tons of money, and killed 4,000+ US troops. We can gain nothing by continuing it. Try and name one thing that is actually worth the fight! You can't like your profile says! They do not have weapons of mass destruction! The war was a shame and cost way too much in lives and money! We gots to go! And you agree! e) Obama did oppose the war! This is a lie! (. http://en.wikisource.org...'s_Iraq_Speech) f) The war is not working! Stabalizing the Middle East will not happen from killing people! We need a diplomatic effort! Killing people wont stabalize a region! We entered the war to get weapons of mass destruction, but there are none! We killed Sadaam! We learned Iraq and Al Qaida are not linked! We can save money and lives. Continuing is unethical and illogical! And your source is not a quality source, and needs to be updated according to Wikipedia itself! And your source has benchmarks set. The goal of the war will never be achieved and is not. h) I NEVER DROPPED IRAQ! !! Points 2F, 2G, 2H, and 2I all touch on Iraq! !! I say your point is not solving anything! In actual policy debate that is called 'non-unique. ' I never dropped the argument! This is just a way to weasel out of debating the point that you will loose! Iraq is causing us to loose good relationships, money, lives. And it solves nothing! i) We're saying the same thing! !! Some weaseling out of the point! !! Iraq was to install democracy as one of the purposes! !! It has succeeded in that. .. somewhat! !! But there is nothing left to be gained! !! There is no terroristic link! !! And no WMDs! !! Policy a) Obama supports amending free trade to give better advantage to America! McCain supports doing absolutely nothing and keeping it the same! !! b) Your Michigan point is illogical and irrelevant to Obama! c) Whoever abandoned PAYGO does not matter! Obama will reinstate it! !! This is a good thing that will bring fiscal reponsibility! d) We agree. You say Bush's economy was good for five years, but his presidency was 7.5 years. e) Bidding is a better solution than nothing! Foreign Policy: Kennedy talked to both! !! (. http://en.wikipedia.org... [Secret Negotiations]) Kennedy didn't cause a nuclear winter! !! There never was a nuclear winter! A nuclear winter would have destroyed human civilization! Also, you dropped my point about when the cold shoulder of one nation ever got anything done! And take the North Korean point, which you dropped, that shows that when Bush talked to North Korea they significantly reduced their nuke program! Onto my opponents points 1. i) Talking to Al Qaida may be ineffective, but we've got nothing to loose. Not talking to them will always be ineffective. Why would they stop one day if we never talked to them? ii) Yes. Kennedy, however, talked to Kushrev and Castro. He stopped the Cuban Missile Crisis because of it. (. http://en.wikipedia.org... [Secret Negotiations]) iii) I challenged you to mention one time the cold shoulder of one nation worked. You dropped that. 2. i) Your claim about the national debt is untrue. Obama will use PAYGO 100% of the time. And he will slightly increase taxes, like McCain. ii) Mccain's plan ensures the same amount of people. .. And this claim is unsourced as well as untrue. iii) Obama will have a Democratic Congress and be able to get almost anything done. Clinton could not get her plan done because it had holes in it and was with Gingrich's Republican Congress. McCain's plan will not get passed through the likely Democratic Congress. 3. i) Abortion is unconstitutional because women will are not healthy enough to have kids will die and unready mothers will kill themselves will illegal abortions. And your point makes no sense. ii) You support abortion and abortion takes a fetus, but this is another debate. 4. i) The tax credit enforces no laws. Obama will force companies to accept high risk patients, simplify paperwork, have a unified computer system, cover all children. This is a better plan and you know it, which is why you DROPPED these arguments. And proves that we are in FULL AGREEMENT! ii) The $4000 signicicantly HELPS. I know people who have dropped out of college for less than this. iii) Obama will have PAYGO, unlike fiscally irresponsible McCain. 5. i) Obama will help Israel but the Iraq War has strengthened Iran and Al Qaida. (www. npr. org/templates/story/story. php? storyId=9914868) ii) Continuing the war will cost too much and gain nothing. I have proven this over and over. iii) Iraqi lives matter too. With your logic we can kill anybody. Also, killing Iraqis does not help Americans. It strengthens Iran, Al Qaida, and kills Americans. iv) You dropped Bush Tax Cut arguments. I win that point. 6. i) He can help with public diplomacy.