BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Undertale is better than fortnite

Fortnite has been staying on a consistent update schedule weekly for smaller patches seasonal for huge updates Therefore creating a healthy system players don't feel cheated Actually, I have undertale and I almost beat it with the pacifist route. They are only a certain limit of hours of enjoyment while fortnite is endless. The Entry Number 17 is cool but Fortnite has many secrets in Save The World as as well as its own RPG. All the things I listed are skills. Eating stuff and healing isn't skillful. The Undertale Fandom is the definition of cancer. Https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=vjjCpgAj3PE. Just take a look at this and many more. Its no secret Undertale community is bad. Fortnite fans are not just salty kids. Its a large collection of sub-communities. Competitive, Streamer, Youtuber, Creative, Casual. All communities are a lot better than undertale and larger. Fortnite has creative which artist and developers can show off and Epic Promotes them. Toby Fox does NOT promote Undertale developers. They are many other battle royale games like fortnite
Undertale is better than fortnite

Jeez, You are the definition of NITPICKER. How is fortnite on phones bad? Again it is on the person not the platform. This only gives players more options to play and that's not bad nor is it useless. This point was to combat the point that undertale can be played offline, But fortnite can be played anywhere. Fortnite is good because it is always updated, Has a strong community, Fun gameplay and a strive to win. People keep playing fortnite because winning a game or getting a 20 bomb is so rewarding. A shot of happiness that is continuous, While undertale stops once you beat the game, There is so much more to explore in Fortnite, From the PVS, Creative or tournaments. How is fortnite addicting, Battle royale can be repetitive. Rewarding skilled players is god and why should people need to purchase in fortnite, Look at TFUE, Fake defaluts are now a thing. And you don't need to buy either. They are twitch prime, Xbox and playstation skins, Free battle pass and the game frequently pus free items in the shop and you can earn v-bucks. no, Fortnite has way more complexity than undertale. Can you build efficiently, Can you do fast 90's, Can you wall ramp, Double wall ramp, Can you effectively get materials, Can you rotate efficiently, Can you drop efficiently, Can you aim, Can you use a variety of weapons in the game, Can you outplay your opponent, Can you edit efficiently, Can you build battle efficiently, Can you loot quick, Can you use ziplines, Hamster balls, Quadcrahsers and drift boards, Can you peek correctly, Can you push effectively, Can you use callouts effectively and so so much more.
Undertale is better than fortnite

Again 12 year olds buying currency is on the person not the game. You don't need to spend money. I like battle royale better because you can play the game longer and on more platforms Undertale:PC and console Fortnite:PC, Console, Mobile Fortnite can be played on the go on mobile and nintendo switch. Undertale is also addicting. Fortnite awards skill and good players.
Undertale is better than fortnite

Rebuttal to Dr. Franklin: "Undertale is 15 bucks and gold is used for kinda useless in game RPG items. " Well those 15 bucks are totally worth it. I know Fortnite is free, But the aesthetic minds of almost all 12-year-olds want to enhance to by skins or more. It isn't how it should be. It is how people handle it. That 15 bucks are spend, But the enrichment of the gameplay is non-money-wise. "This is stupid. Stop comparing RPGS to battle royale games. " What i actually mean is Rpgs are better than Battle royale games. Undertale is one of the leaders of this area, While Fortnite is very controversial on its ideas. The idea is evident. Also this debate is 5 rounds, So this is not enough. Can you show that you actually like Fortnite instead of Undertale? Reason#2: Wifi coverage/On-offline logics This paragraph is about That why offline games are better than online games. Undertale is an offline game, Which means that the game is intended to be played only by the player him/herself. Fortnite is an online game, Which means more than one player can be connected and be played at the same game. Today has low wifi status. Fortnite is very laggy and the game is not playable enough. But when you put another disc into it, Such as Undertale, It would return normal. This is because Undertale is an offline game and thus barely being affected by the lack of internet connection. And that is why Undertale is better: It is constant as long as the console is plug in. To say that all Battle royale games are online, Try some combat games played against bots. It would be less consuming to the web. "The Culling - Single player mode with bots. " this is one such example. You could argue that games like The Culling isn't as famous as Fortnite, Pubg and other online battle royales, Yet famous isn't always good. Fortnite is more like an epidemic. Also games like Fortnite develop an addiction. It is so repetitive in a way that you don't want it to end. For example, Anybody has the experience of losing in fortnite want to get a victory royale immediately. This emotion cause it to let them play on and play on, Eventually develop an addiction on games which could be harmful for them. Something else, It is possible to be addicted to buying skins and other cosmetics that would be some sort of waste of money, Causing them to spend like a "boss" in real life and be a threat to the economy. (i'm not saying 100%, But it is definitely possible) all these start at a stage of online gaming. On the other hand Undertale is offline. You can save and enjoy whenever you want to put it down or pick it up. It ain't some sort of attraction like, If you don't get victory you don't go. All those fights are either too hard or too easy to be attracted, Making themselves either skim through the fight or put the game down. Undertale isn't repetitive at all, Yet the fun isn't at all addictive either.
Undertale is better than fortnite

"used to buy stuff that will enhance your gaming experience" No, Its optional and fortnite is free, While undertale is 15 bucks. What are you talking about? You can only get v-bucks from buying or rare special events. V-Bucks font give anyone any advantage. Undertale is 15 bucks and gold is used for kinda useless in game RPG items. Stealing moms credit card isnt on the game Fortnite itself. This is stupid. Stop comparing RPGS to battle royale games.
Undertale is better than fortnite

Reason #1: Currency Fortnite uses an imaginary currency in the game, Called V-bucks. V-bucks are used to buy stuff that will enhance your gaming experience. V-bucks possibly come in 3 ways: 1 of them is that you eliminate all human beings on the bandwagon-ish island and you get s "Victory Royale", Thus V-bucks are used here as a reward for winning the entire game. Another way is to buy a battle pass. Every battle pass earns you a steady amount of V-bucks as long as you get it. However normal gamers are jealous of the high-tier artifacts, Thus exchange real money with V-bucks to buy them. V-bucks were abused and revealing the flaw of the items: exposing gives out a disadvantage. Thus that's why fortnite money sucks. On the other hand, Undertale money, Gold (that's what it's called), Were a reliable source to trade in-game. There're a handful of shopkeepers that can flirt with you (and may be change the price of it), Instead of a complete digital shop in which everything was taken for granted. Gold can be earned if you defeat an enemy without killing it. Gold can be earned if you sold one item to one of the NPCs spread across the kingdom. And most importantly, It does not get wired to the real currency. You can simply spare monsters and farm cash with it, Instead of killing up to 99 people and take the money for granted. You all see that mom's credit card was stolen because the boy wants to play fortnite with a sense of pride. But is doesn't happen in Undertale: items like Old tutu and Dog residue were scattered everywhere, Aiding the protagonist Frisk, And causing them to develop the emotional changes through the route of battle against heroes. Currency isn't being utilized as a soulless stepping stone, Instead it is a "Philosopher's stone" which can possess ideas and moralities indirectly as when you used it for good. Toriel may call you when you trade with Sans or carry Undyne's letter along the journey. It is fun instead of soulless. Even in Genocide money could be used to buy weapons and fulfill your killing journey.
Undertale is better than fortnite

Fortnite has secretsSkill is reflexesYou don't understand, Fortnite has a way better skillste than UndertaleNerd kids LOVE undertale, They want to anel Sans. No the point is that there ARE parodies. Fortnite streamers are not bad or rageMonarchy? No, You can get any creative maps. "Meanigful" BS. I doint play games to Be Meangiful
Pick your debate - 4/5 topics

Thanks Vi for issuing the challenge and including those excellent definitions. This is a great topic and I'm sure it will be a fantastic debate. I think it is very impressive that you are willing to argue either side of all these topics, I'm not sure that I could. I affirm the resolution: "Terrorism can be justified". I would like to point out to readers that in no way do I support or condone terrorism. I am merely pointing out that in certain extreme conditions, it can in fact be justified. I await my opponent's arguments. Thanks.
Pick your debate - 4/5 topics

Hello hello, all. This is a continuation of my 5 topics for debate - now down to 4 topics. Again - I will argue as Pro or Con. My opponent will choose one of these debates and choose their side. Actual debating will begin in Round 2, starting with me. Definitions will also be supplied in Round 2. If there are any questions, please leave them in the comments section for me to answer. REMAINING TOPICS: 1. Logical Fatalism can not be disproved. 2. Terrorism can be justified. 3. Beauty is objective. 4. It is true that if an infinite being can be imagined, it must exist. POST NOTE: Some definitions to start out with as my opponent has shown interest in debate number 2. TERRORISM: Terrorism is the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.[1] At present, there is no internationally agreed definition of terrorism.[2][3] Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants. (First paragraph: http://en.wikipedia.org...) JUSTIFIED 1 a : to prove or show to be just, right, or reasonabl (http://www.merriam-webster.com...)
free verse is just prose and not poetry

As I quoted above, the definition of poetry is: "Poetry is a form of literary art which uses aesthetic and rhythmic qualities of language-such as phonaesthetics, sound symbolism, and metre-to evoke meanings in addition to, or in place of, the prosaic ostensible meaning." This states rather clearly the difference between poetry generally and prose. In layman's terms, prose relies more or less exclusively on the denotations and connotations evoked by words to express meaning while poetry uses (either exclusively or in addition to denotation and connotation) secondary aspects of the act of typing words to evoke meaning. This is not merely metrical; it can be any aesthetic or symbolic quality that is outside of the direct meaning of the words themselves. Free verse is highly rhythmic, and it is broken into lines. The positioning of line breaks are meaningful in many cases because it creates pauses in rhythmic structure that are not a part of prosaic, grammatical writing. Repeating patterns of words, punctuation outside the rules of grammar, and grammatically unnecessary repetition are all aspects of free verse that differentiate it from prose. Although free verse does use typical structural means to meet the definition of poetry, it heavily utilizes methods of making points and shifting meaning that are outside of the prosaic constraints of the meaning of words to make messages clear. As such, free verse is a separate form of writing from prose, and it is firmly within the poetry camp.
free verse is just prose and not poetry

Poetry itself is not verse. As it says in the above quoted Wikipedia page, "The word "verse" is commonly, though incorrectly, used in lieu of "poetry" to distinguish it from prose." http://en.wikipedia.org... What this separation between the terms establishes is that although a formal verse is metrical, this requirement to contain meter does not extend to the definition of a poem. As a matter of fact, the definition of poetry is as follows: "Poetry is a form of literary art which uses aesthetic and rhythmic qualities of language"such as phonaesthetics, sound symbolism, and metre"to evoke meanings in addition to, or in place of, the prosaic ostensible meaning." http://en.wikipedia.org... Nowhere in this definition is metre made a necessary requirement of poetry. Instead, rhythm is more a key to the form. Even in the first essay my opponent quotes above, the author says, "Technically you can only call something poetry if it has structure i.e. metre or rhythm." If this author is correct, then writing with either metre or rhythm could potentially be considered poetry. Free verse often relies very heavily upon the rhythm of speech, and it is perfectly allowed to utilize other poetic techniques. Therefore, it is ludicrous to assert that free verse can be classified as prose merely because it lacks metre. That said, the cited work by Colin leslie dean is badly wrong in saying that including either metre or rhythm is necessary to create poetry. The express use of the aesthetic qualities of language to evoke meaning is central to the definition of the craft. Consequently, any piece in which language is used to evoke meaning outside of the words themselves is poetry. The presence of line breaks changes the rhythm of reading speaking and is poetic in and of itself. In addition, repetition of words or phrases can be a poetic device that expresses meaning that is not held merely within the words themselves. In free verse, poetry is achieved by means in many ways dissimilar to other poetic forms; however, words are used both denotatively and aesthetically, and this is the essence of the poetic endeavor.
free verse is just prose and not poetry

This work points out http://www.scribd.com... Based on the definition of free verse it follows free verse is not poetry but only prose http://en.wikipedia.org... . "In poetry, metre (meter in American English) is the basic rhythmic structure of a verse or lines in verse " http://en.wikipedia.org... "The word "verse" is commonly used in lieu of "poetry" to distinguish it from prose. Where the common unit of poetry, that is, verse, is based on meter or rhyme A verse is formally a single metrical line in a poetic composition" Free verse is usually defined as having no fixed meter and no end rhyme" Thus free verse is not poetry/verse but only prose and those who write it are not poets as free verse is not in metre-which is the defining essence of poetry ie which makes a writing poetry if free verse is poetry then there is no way to tell free verse from prose also if free verse is poetry then the works Dickens or Tolstoy or any prose writer is poetry and the telephone directory or encyclopedia are poetry
free verse is just prose and not poetry

In no way did I contradict myself. In the first instance above,the definition includes phonaesthetics, sound symbolism, and metre as examples of the rhythmic qualities of language. To read that definition as saying that any of the three are necessary characteristics of a poem is incorrect. The essence of the poem is that it uses aesthetic and rhythmic qualities of language that go beyond the direct meaning of the words. Metre is a method of achieving this, but it is in no way the only way of doing so. The second quote of mine you give, "Free verse is highly rhythmic, and it is broken into lines," does not refer to prose. Of course prose is composed of lines; this is because paper is not infinitely long. It is, however, not broken into lines by specific and intentional line breaks, which is what I was clearly referring to. Finally, I very clearly answered Pro's question. In round 2, my first paragraph clearly distinguished poetry from prose in a general sense, and then the second paragraph specifically distinguished free verse from prose and explained how free verse does fall into the poetry camp. Pro may not be satisfied with this answer, but I feel no need to reiterate a point already made clear. I shall leave it to the voters to decide whether I made my refutation sufficiently clearly.
free verse is just prose and not poetry

con contradicts himself 1) you say "As I quoted above, the definition of poetry is: "Poetry is a form of literary art which uses aesthetic and rhythmic qualities of language-such as phonaesthetics, sound symbolism, and metre-to evoke meanings in addition to, or in place of, the prosaic ostensible meaning." note your definition of poetry includes metre but free verse is not in metre thus it cant be poetry con gives a definition of free vere which prose can fullfill 2)you say "Free verse is highly rhythmic, and it is broken into lines.." but that can be prose as well con does not answer my question 3) you did not answer my question what the difference between free verse and prose thus con has not refuted my claim that free is not poetry
Divine Command Theory

Divine command is in no way a contradiction to evolution..!!quite the contrary.!! the first source of evolution is in genesis:" earth was chaos nothingness"talking about a existence prior to creation...!! what the existence was could be answered by the teary of evolution..!! I like to thank all readers,and voters. i thank you in advance for your efford in controling whats fair and promoting honesty.! I ask all to excuse my shortcomings, based on my effort despite the circumstances take in consideration my opponents jeopardizing this debate,and not to reward him for it..!!
Divine Command Theory

as its evident this valuable topic exploration was jeopardised by my partner , I will focus this round on negating the argument that we are not naturally bound to laws and rules and this world is coincidental..By contrast, to make an point for what is in fact a fraudulent hoax, one must use talent, and plenty of sophistication and remain beholden to unnatural protection of what is really an illogical position. then despite the efforts of those talented fraudulent individuals, the hoax could easily be refuted and nullified, by humanities natural pursuit of the truth..!! coincidence is the devine's way to stay anonymous..!! this fraudulent argument (despite it being made by the most powerful groups controlling the media and law and education,and other secular institutions) did not succeed to quench, our thirst for spiritual satisfaction humanity always clings to..!! moreover, as they themselves design anything dependent on success, they begin on the same process they deny was used to create this..!! as you go to any secular institution for example a building department, controlled by a secular government. even as they will argue that the world was created by circumstance,however they will not allow you to build a city by circumstance..!! quite the contrary..!! they will explain that a sound city , must be carefully planed and designed..!! in addition the same people who argue that the world was not created by a plan and not governed by rules would never feel secured to live in a city with no police and no justice and no rules...!! if they need a car they will understand, that its illogical to wait it should create itself. however some still argue that this is what happened to our world..!! many in our world explore areas like past life memory..!! as I am not qualified, to use this as a credible point. it proves a quest for spiritual connection..!! if you make a search on obscure subject like aura its amazing how much some build on it..!!http://www.google.com... the most who fall into obscure new age, spiritual connections are the very same who fall away from their base,by those fraudulent sophisticated groups..!! all showing you: that not only is it natural and right and just, to believe and abide by the rules of Divine..!! the very ones who argue against it, cant live and even do not intent to live, by their false argument...!!
Divine Command Theory

thanks for starting this debate. I am glad we have the opportunity to explore this issue as a team, in which one will have a con postion ,and one a pro position . But the team as a whole will win when the truth will be discovered..! Before stating my rational we have to define the definition of devine and why its should effect our code of justice.? The definition of devine that we all agree on ,is the intelactual source.!! This is agreed by all muslim christian,budhist,falon gong jewish etc. Also we need to agree how the devine ,is effecting. Or should be effecting our judgment and system of justice. Just how the world synergisticly designed by rules ..! Otherwise it would be able to exist.(For example if the distamce of world from the sun ,would be changed we would not be able to exist...!) So is everything else limited to rules and bound be them to be able to exist..! Like chemistry,madical,finance,art etc. World and its system designed to be fonctioning by rules. The rules are what is making the world function and prosper,in a natrual eviroment.! That's also the case with us we are to prosper by the rules. The inteligant source designed for us to exist in and to prosper with..! This rules is natrual and desined to be fair and just..!
World Governments and People Should Abandon their Native Languages and Adopt English

Well, Sorry for the Delay. Yes it would make some part of government simple and help the transition of policy and agreements easier. However it would; 1. Turmoil with the vast amount of countries that had to drop there native Languages. 2. English is the not a language with the broadest set of term and definitions, nor is any other languages. 3. It would never work, for the fact is that there is 6909 (give or take) languages in the world. 4. Dialects of the languages make this even more complicated, where there is more dialects then you could image. 5. Religion would also be impacted. 6. The World should not adopt English due to technology it, should be the complete opposite where technology should adopt all the known languages. 7. (See Argument 9 of the pro) What is call an unnecessary expanses is someone's job and what will can unknown amount is apart of are world economy, which is employing people. 8. Finally you would have to learn the thousand of other languages anyways. Workcited Sources http://www.ethnologue.com... http://globalrecordings.net... http://www.interproinc.com... http://www.nap.edu... http://www.thefreedictionary.com...