Germs in the blood is a secondary phase of the disease process.

A. Within the confines of a debate, the instigator must clearly define his terms. Pro has failed to do so, even following repeated requests. CON has asked 11 times for pro to define the term "secondary phase of disease". He has not. CON has asked 6 times for pro to define the term "less educated persons". He has not. Thus pro has failed to define his terms. -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- B. Within the confines of a debate, the instigator must present data , especially where CON has made the lack of this data an integral part of the progress of the debate. Pro has failed to do so, even following repeated requests. CON has asked pro 8 times for pro to outline results from treatment of "leaky gut" He has not CON has asked 6 times for pro to list "successful "leaky gut" clinics. He has not CON has asked 6 times for pro to list persons who would not have survived save treatment of "leaky gut" He has not Thus pro has failed to substantiate his claims with any real world results. --------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- C. One also need to heed the effectiveness of vaccines in reducing world wide disease. See ""Winning the war against ancient diseases" (1) Or "12 Deadly Diseases Cured in the 20th Century" (2) ------------------------- ---------------------- D. Here is an assessment of pro"s position by an "educated person"...."Rather than look at the mountains of evidence to support germ theory and the complete lack of evidence to support pleomorphism as the reason for the dominance of germ theory, they resort to paranoid sounding conspiracy theories." (3) --------------------- -------------------- E. CON has asked 4 times for pro to defend his assertion that Nobel Laureates are "fools" . He presented NO DEFENSE but merely said "All those scientists who received a Nobel prize for research based on germ theory should be asked to return there prize money because germ theory is a fraud." And further "Einstein can return his prize as well, because relativity is another fraud." Pro provided NO DEFENSE for either statement. ----------------------------- ---------------------------- F. Rabies is an example of a disease without intestinal involvement. Rabies comes ""extra corpus humanum without any connection to enterobacteria. " (4) Additionally the processes of fermentation and eutrophication take place "extra corpus humanum" without any connection to enterobacteria. ------------------------- ----------------------- G. Another source "Title 17, California Code of Regulations (CCR) "2500, "2593, "2641.5- 2643.20, and "2800-2812 Reportable Diseases and Conditions* (5) calls out for example botulism - where some cases are shown to come from wounds, with no involvement of the digestive system. (6) ------------------------- ------------------------ H. The Mayo Clinic offers reasonable defense against germs and other microbes (7) ----------------- ----------------- Conclusion It appears that taking germs as a cause of disease, and taking medical actions based on that idea has reduced the incidence of many diseases worldwide, and lengthened life span. Germ theory can save your life. "Leaky gut " theory might only reduce the intensity of your tummy ache. Therefore the weight of data and evidence supports the CON position which must be declared the winner. QED ****************************************************** (1)http://www.cnn.com... (2)https://health.howstuffworks.com... (3)https://sciencebasedmedicine.org... (4)https://www.nobelprize.org... (5)https://www.cdph.ca.gov... (6)http://www.acphd.org... (7)https://www.mayoclinic.org...