Absolute Morality proves Biblical Creation

"When did evolution teach one to create one white race? " Darwin said, "At some future period, Not very distant as measured by centuries, The civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes. . . Will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, For it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, As we may hope, Even than the Caucasian, And some ape as low as a baboon, Instead of as now between the negro or Australian [Aborigine] and the gorilla. " Also to note is that the last part of "On the Origin of Species" says, "And the Preservation of the Favored Races. " Some people who used Darwinian evolution to push their murderous agenda include: Theodore Roosevelt, Adolf Hitler, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot. You ask were did all those society's go. Well, Nazi Germany is no more and neither is the USSR. However, Both of those nations do not exist because they murdered a large part of their populations. Nazi Germany was killing Jews before WWII began. If they hadn't invaded Poland who is to say that they would not be in existence today? The USSR had plenty of people in it before it broke up. The US did not fight against them because they were killing their people in Gulags, But because they were a nuclear threat. Therefore USSR did not fall because of their mass murder of people. Even today countries such as Iran, China, Vietnam and North Korean murder people. Also there have been many society's in the past that have had a point in their history where they murdered people and their civilizations lasted for centuries. Take these examples: Greece killed babies they didn't see as fit to live, Rome killed thousands of Christians, The Vatican and the Reformed countries of Germany and Switzerland killed thousands of Anabaptist's, Yet their societies survived. What about France? The atheist Reign of Terror killed many of their population yet they survived. What about America and the killing of slaves, Indians and Filipinos. The US society is still in existence. You have to show me a society that was only destroyed because they murdered a certain group in their society. According to a new Gallop poll 62% of Americans say that abortion is immoral and before the US Supreme Court annulled the Constitutions of many States the majority of States had laws against homosexual marriages. You say that the German people were led to exterminate the Jews because of propaganda, But that is a weak excuse for the German people knew exactly what they were doing. Society often changes its opinion. One clear example is in regard to "gay marriage. " What was considered morally wrong by most of society is now legal, Applauded, And celebrated by some groups. In this view, Homosexual behavior went from being morally wrong to being morally acceptable. You say that society would not allow murder because it would not benefit their society. However, Our society did decide that a certain murder was ok. In Roe v. Wade we legalized the killing of unborn children and are at the point where some are advocating for partial birth abortion. Does murder suddenly become morally acceptable too? What about adultery, Stealing (socialism does this), Lying or any other manner of morally reprehensible actions? Would you accept a society that decides that decides that the society can kill all atheists and humanists (after all there would be an advantage for survival for Christians)? If society is the moral compass, Then the compass never points north but rather jumps all over the place and changes with every generation. Also, If society determines morality, How can one society tell another society what is right or wrong? Most people would agree that the abhorrent actions of the Nazi death camps were morally wrong. But why? Nazi Germany decided as a society that these actions were morally acceptable. What right does our society have to judge their society if morality is simply a societal preference? Or what about certain Muslim groups? Few would agree that blowing up innocent civilians, Slaughtering hundreds of people from other religious groups, Kidnapping and enslaving women, Or using children as suicide bombers is morally acceptable. Yet if morality is simply societal preference, What right does our society have to tell their society that their actions are wrong and must be stopped? The consistent atheist or humanist can say nothing if that is the ethic a society has decided is right. In this view, The atheist, Based on his arbitrary opinion, Might not agree with their ethic, But they have no rationale to say anything or try to put a stop to it. If morality is simply decided by societal preference, It fails to make any sense and becomes arbitrary, Subject to change by time and culture. Not only are we moving to murder in our society through abortion, But also with eugenics. In The Netherlands there is an epidemic of the state euthanizing older people without their consent. Here are some questions for you: If we are simply chemical accidents, As evolutionists contend, Why should we feel compelled to behave in a particular fashion? If laws of morality are just what bring the most happiness to the most people, Then why would it be wrong to kill just one innocent person if it happened to make everyone else a lot happier? If laws of morality are just the adopted social custom, Then why was what Hitler did wrong? How did blind chemistry create morality? Closing Statement The Christian worldview not only accounts for morality, It also accounts for why evolutionists behave the way they do. Even those who have no basis for morality within their own professed worldview nonetheless hold to a moral code; this is because in their heart of hearts they really do know the God of creation despite their profession to the contrary. Scripture tells us that everyone knows the biblical God, But that they suppress the truth about God (Rom. 1:18"21). Why would anyone do this? We have inherited a sin nature (a tendency to rebel against God) from Adam (Rom. 5:12), Who rebelled against God in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3). John 3:19 indicates that people would rather remain in spiritual darkness than have their evil deeds exposed. Just as Adam tried to hide from God"s presence (Gen. 3:8), So his descendants do the same. But the solution to sin is not suppression, It is confession and repentance (1 John 1:9; Luke 5:32). Christ is faithful to forgive anyone who calls on His name (Rom. 10:13). Nearly everyone believes that people ought to behave in a certain way " a moral code. Yet in order for morality to be meaningful, Biblical creation must be true. Since God created human beings, He determines what is to be considered right and wrong, And we are responsible to Him for our actions. We must therefore conclude that evolutionists are being irrational when they talk about right and wrong, For such concepts make no sense in an evolutionary universe.