I can take the highest scores by using my homework.

http://www.toronsil.com... http://www.amazon.com... I participate the class 'Reading books and Debate'. I participate this class by using Korean. I need to finish this homework before 16th in this month. This homework is that I should read 'Bad Samaritans' and make summary, appreciative criticism, debate topic based on the book. I need my opponent who will correct my homework by pointing out my weakness in my homework as harsh as possible. If someone do this, I will advocate my homework that have worth to give me highest scores. Because I want to do this, I translated my original Korean homework to English. I should finish my homework by using Korean, but I need help from this site. You can pointing out anything, and everything that will prove that the homework have not worth to give me highest score. For example, you can pointing out the summary is too long or too short. You can pointing out my summary contain unnecessary things or does not contain necessary things. You can pointing out 'appreciative criticism' have many logical errors. Or you should pointing out my debate topic cannot fulfill the standard. 1st. 'Debate Topic' should be made for dividing pros and cons clearly. 2nd. Pros should require 'change current situation', Cons should require 'keep current situation if they debate by accepting debate topic. [My homework] (Bad Samaritans, Ha-Joon Chang, Random House) (Summary) Economic policies that are based on neoliberalism does not helpful for developing economy of developing countries. Developed countries did not wear 'golden straitjacket' called by Thomas Friedman for developing economy. When they got enough wealth, they kick way the ladder by propagating policies of free-market to the other countries. Theory of comparative cost is right when each countries just keep their level of technologies. Imposing legal controls on foreign investments is needed because capitals also have nationality. The regulations are not the important cause to disturb foreign investments. The incentives for foreign investments are 'marketing opportunities', 'superiority of labor and SOC'. Problems of public enterprise are 'master-representative', 'steal a ride', 'limit of soft budget'. These problems are also existed in large, private corporations. Privatization plans for the utility companies is not good solution for enhancing efficiency. In addition, it is harder to use the policies of Imposing legal controls on private corporations and giving a subsidy to private corporations than managing public enterprises for governments in the developing countries. Although the patent and copyright system are also needed, excessive protection for copyright will cause decrease public interests. Keeping nation's fiscal health and price stabilization does not a cure-all for economy of developing countries. Irregularities and corruption, and non-democratic governments are not enemies to economic growth. Proper incentives will quickly change cultures. So, developed countries should suggest developing countries policies of protective trade for their economic growth. (appreciative criticism ) Policies of protective trade by United Kingdoms damaged textile manufacturing industry in India. So I guess UK became rich but India became poor. By following principles of free-trade, UK could get copyright of textile manufacturing machines first. Next UK could get royalty from textile manufacturing industry in India, or could built factories in India. I think thwas the win-win game. If UK took this plan, UK did not satisfied with its own position, but it could get better position by itself. And the author told that developed countries should support developing countries because the support gives developed countries economical profits. But, he did not mention 'opportunity cost' that the cost consumed for supporting developing countries could be used to develop technologies for developed countries itselves. So the plan by the author have many weakness. If the capitalism of market suggests that people can invest by following their own incentives but they should be charge of the result of investment, it is hard to invest 'uncertainty' just because he or she took the suggestion based on 'No investment, No profits.'. And, I need contrast between author's 'low growth rate', 'the unimproved gap between rich and poor' and the comments related to same topic in the book 'Skeptical Environmentalist'. (Debate Topics) 1. A common idea that observing principles of free market made the the miracle of Korean economy should be changed? 2. Should developed countries suggest developing countries policies of protective trade for their economic growth? 3. We should not allow editing history for winners and reinterpreting past by using the view of present. 4. Policies of free trade and free market based on neoliberalism does not help to get growth and equality? 5. Should public enterprises come under private management? 6. Is it essential that developing countries bollow ideas from advanced countries for economic growth? 7. Should we admit that irregularities and corruption come from 'excessively huge market?' 8. Should we admit that free market does not absolute friend of democracy? 9. Should we admit that people in developing countries are lazy because the countries are poors? 10. Should countries in the world abolish industry customs completely? 11. Should we take a short-period loss to develop abilities in the long period? 12. Our country should concentrate to develop the manufacturing industry instead of the first industry and the service industry. 13. Our country should hire first-class economists to manage good economic policies.