Do Christians have the real Bible? Christian Vs Muslim Perspectives

Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheemبِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ,The topic at hand specifies that we're examining both the Christian and Muslim claim in respect to the Christian origins of the Biblical texts and their textual reliability (preservation). From the onset, we must identify several foundations for my later argumentation, namely: There is no original Bible canonical codex in existence (first complete canons and codices date from the 4th century: Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus).[1] There is no original manuscript from the scribes of whom they are attributed to, in current existence (Papyri 52 is the earliest, dated to roughly 125 CE, that is to say empirically decided). [2] My opponent has to name the canon or codex and the reasoning as to why he believes the named canon or codex is the 'real Bible'. The Qur'an does not say the Injil or Torah became corrupted, however it does say eisegesis was done (5:13) and an alternate text developed by scribes (2:79) to be used.[3] The dogma that the Bible was inspired (viz a viz 2 Tim. 3:16 [4]) is exactly that, a dogma, not empirical evidence, since we are examining the textual nature, further study into that verse is irrelevant. However a simple understanding is that it refers to the Old Testament (as it says in verse 15, Peter was a child when he studied those scriptures), the NT did not exist during his childhood or adulthood (Pastorial authorship is heavily disputed).While the NT is the most populous of old world manuscripts, it does have more contradictions between the texts, than their are words [5]. This presents a problem as the Biblical God addresses Himself as the anti-thesis to confusion (1 Cor. 14:33), since these manuscripts and contradictions are revised every few years under the guise of the GNT by the Nestle Aland group, it is testament to the fact that the 'scripture' of the Christians is indeed dynamic and therefore constantly in contradiction with previous editions. If the Bible is indeed inspired by God, why is there no original text, or one constant text always in use? Christians boast of 1000's of manuscripts. Of what use are these manuscripts if there is no original to compare them to? If I had $1 in Monopoly money and $1 in USD, and I photocopied the Monopoly dollar while I destroyed the USD, how would anyone be able to counter my argument that the Monopoly was not an authentic USD, if there existed no original to compare it with? How can you compare something with nothing and claim something to be authentic? Similarly, since there are many varying canons and codices with virtually none in agreement with each other, how can anyone claim that there is one 'scripture that is the Bible'?The role of the Patristics (early Church Fathers) adds more evidences to the claim that the Christians do not possess an authentic 'Bible', in fact; of the 27 NT canonical books no Patristic accepts them all according to the empirical evidences we possess [6]. As for the manuscripts that do contain Patristic quotes of what later came to be known as the NT, we read the following:"It is as true of the New Testament quotations in the Church Fathers as it is of the versions that they are often misjudged and consequently misused. The route from a modern edition of a Church Father's works back to the text which he read in his New Testament may be long and tortuous... But even when a modern critical edition is available there is no certainty that it preserves the New Testament quotations of a work as they occurred in its original form." - K. Aland & B. Aland (Trans. E. F. Rhodes), The Text Of The New Testament: An Introduction To The Critical Editions And To The Theory And Practice Of Modern Textual Criticism, 1995 (2nd Revised Edition), op. cit., p. 171."Patristic sources provide primary evidence for the history of the text but only secondary evidence for the original text itself." - B. D. Ehrman, Didymus The Blind And The Text Of The Gospels, 1986, op. cit., p. 5. See the footnote 2.While Christians boast of possessing those NT quotes from the Patristics, they are essentially worthless, save for proving that; that version of the next was historically in existence at its time of writing. Yet it does not bolster the text's authenticity or accuracy.On the Muslim perspective, the Qur'an and Sunnah state: Allaah confirmed He sent previous revelations, but never mentions the Bible (Kitab ul Muqaddas or Majmu ul Kutub) as one of them. Allaah's words were never changed or cannot be changed since it is an asma wa sifaat of Allaah. However people wrote words and claimed it to be from Him (2:79, as is testament to the Targum and Talmuds which became like scripture to the Jews: [7]).Therefore God's word was not altered but hidden/ lost (see: Anti Ochus' invasion of Yirusalem, during the reign of Josiah the son of Ammon and when Nebuchadnezzar invaded). The Christian claim that Allaah verifies the Bible is mere conjecture as, the Injil was given to Jesus (Qur'an 19:30), no Christian believe the Bible was given by Christ but that it was written in 'inspiration' after him. Sources: K. Aland and B. Aland, The Text Of The New Testament: An Introduction To The Critical Editions & To The Theory & Practice Of Modern Text Criticism, 1995, op. cit., p. 29 Ibid. 2:79, "So woe to their learned people, who write the law with their own hands and then say to the people, "This is from Allah," so that they might gain some paltry worldly end. (They do not see that) this writing of their hands will bring woe to them and what they gain thereby will lead to their ruin."5:13, "Then, for their breach of the covenant We cast them away from Our mercy and caused their hearts to harden. (And now they are in such a state that) they pervert the words from their context and thus distort their meaning, and have forgotten a good portion of the teaching they were imparted, and regarding all except a few of them you continue to learn that they committed acts of treachery. Pardon them, then, and overlook their deeds. Surely Allah loves those who do good deeds." 2 Tim. 3:15, "and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus." Novum Testamentum Graecum, cum lectionibus variantibus MSS. The Development of the NT Canon, http://www.ntcanon.org... The Spark of All Truths, Chabad, http://www.chabad.org...