Facist economics vs Capitalist economics

My opponent has not shown that fascism is more efficient because his argument is flawed for various reasons. Under a free market, taxes do exist. Taxes are necessary and any economist will tell you that capitalism only advocates taxes that are used for military, law enforcement (police), contract enforcement (court), and public infrastructure. Any idea that pure capitalist nations would not be able to construct roads is a myth and is an ill-founded concept. Taxes cannot redistribute income under capitalism, that is all. Now, of course some accidental redistribution will occur (e.g. if we all pay the same share of taxes but some people drive farther distances to work than others then the wealth is somewhat redistributed). But capitalism tries to avoid these "neighborhood effects". Pro says that capitalism is not efficient because it's pillars of greed and competition cancel each other out sometimes. This is not true. Greed is what drives efficiency. Let us consider your flying car example. The inventors of the flying car are not socially obligated to tell others about their invention, it is theirs' and they can choose to do whatever they want with the idea. Now, if they choose to manufacture and sell flying cars at a high price and can make a profit from doing so, then good for everyone. Where leftists go wrong is that they seem to think that if you go through the process of discovering, theorizing, engineering, testing, marketing, analyzing, manufacturing, and selling something that changes the world forever, you are not obligated to sell it at a price that fits everyone's budget! If people are willing to pay ten million dollars for a flying car then that is the price: that is the real value. Even if you only manufacture one flying car and sell it for one hundred million dollars, you are still contributing greatly to the world, and you are being rewarded because obviously that flying car was worth one hundred million dollars (or no one would have payed for it). You are correct that it would be in the "common interest" that the inventor be forced to sell his wonderful invention to the toiling masses who did not go through the painstaking process of making a flying car. But since when does "common interest" mean "right"? It would be immoral to do that. So fascism, unlike capitalism, does not focus on doing the right thing, only doing the popular thing. This is where lynchings, mobs, lootings, and general medieval collectivism comes about. My opponent has forgotten that, even though capitalism specializes in creating wonderful inventions, it also specializes in making these products cheaper and cheaper and cheaper. Many great industrialists made their fortune on doing exactly what fascism tries to do. Henry Ford, King Camp Gillette, Thomas Edison, and many others made plenty of money inventing and changing previous inventions to make them better, safer, and cheaper. These entrepreneurs were supporters of capitalism and sold their products on the free market, making the world we see today. Pro also said that capitalism leads to monopolies. This is not true because capitalism exploits private interests to help the "common interest". This is a constant truth and here is an example of how this relates to monopolies: Auto companies X, Y, and Z enter into agreement that they will sell their cars at a high price and use their monopoly power to maintain the large profit margin. Two things happen now: first, the profitability of entering this industry and undercutting companies X, Y, and Z has increased exponentially and two, the profitability of either X, Y, or Z dropping out of the agreement and undercutting the price of the cars has increased exponentially. So one of these things (or more often, both things) happen and the monopoly is destroyed. Greed comes to the rescue, again. In fact, the only way a monopoly is sustained is if the government prevents those two things from happening. Bureaucracy can contribute to this: the ability to create a public utility company or public transportation company is hard in places where capitalism is less present because the government has deals with the current company or companies and regulators would rather deal with one or two companies than deal with a free market. Therefore, the efficiency of the free market is hindered by bureaucracy. This is what fascism does.