It is more rational to believe the Easter Bunny exists than the god of the Jews/Christians/Muslims

I will also be referring to the god of the Jews/Christians/Muslims as Yahweh. There are thousands of claimed god throughout human culture. In order not to presuppose there existence away, I won't assume Yahweh to be the only one, I will use the name instead. I would like to begin by acknowledging some cultural biases regarding this subject. The culture we reside in is clearly a theistic culture. Within a theistic culture, we hear a voice which states that the belief in a god is a rational position to have. We cannot avoid having this voice influence our thinking and how we view the subject in question. Our culture already is influencing the way in which we consider the question. I would like to ask those involved to try and put aside your cultural biases and just consider the argument I present. It will be tough, but give it a try. I intend to argue that it would be more rational to accept the existence of the Easter Bunny over the existence of Yahweh based on what it is claimed that both beings are. I will be comparing the traits of both beings, in hopes of illustrating that the Easter Bunny is more likely to exist and therefore more rational to believe in. Before I compare claimed traits, I would like to make a distinction between two types of traits. One I will label PT. PT represents known Possible Traits. These are traits that we know exist. Example, a person behind a door. Someone claims the person behind the door has naturally blonde hair. We know naturally blonde hair is a trait available to humans. The other trait category is what I will call QPT, Questionable Possible Trait. In this example, we change the claim of the women's hair color to naturally green hair. Since naturally green hair isn't know to exist as an option for humans, this trait is in question. In our comparison of the hair color, the claim of the women with green hair is weaker than the claim of the women with blonde hair since we cannot be sure that green hair is an option. If we can confirm green hair as an option, then the green hair prior position of a QPT graduates to a PT. PT are stronger than QPT since we can be certain that they are an option. QPTs are weaker traits because they haven't been determined to be available. I will argue that the Easter Bunny has fewer QPTs than Yahweh, therefore belief in the Easter Bunny is more rational. I will also argue, that with additional traits, any being or object becomes less likely. Easter Bunn Traits, after each trait, I will place the trait into the correct category, PT or QPT. What is the Easter Bunny, what traits does the Easter Bunny have? 1. Animal, this seems fairly easy, yes PT 2. Smart, animals can be smart, we are a smart animal, yes PT 3. Hides food for children, this is a behavior, behaviors are personality traits, animals do hide food, but animals don't hide food for human children, that we are aware of, no QPT 4. Abnormally large for a rabbit. We don't have any confirmed rabbits of Easter Bunny size, no QPT Hopefully I'm not missing any other significant Easter Bunny claimed traits. If we stop here on the Easter Bunny, we can say that half of the Easter Bunny's traits are traits that we know can exist. Yahweh has gotten a fair amount of press over the years, so we have a few more claimed traits regarding Yahweh. I decided to go with the seven most common claimed traits. You can find a more extensive list on godonthe. net. Here are Yahweh's claimed traits. 1. Spirit, defined as a incorporeal living being, incorporeal defined as consisting of no physical material, do we know if it is possible for a living thing to exist despite being made of no material parts, no QPT 2. Eternal, do we know this is available to living things, no, QPT 3. Omniscience, do we know that a living thing with no material brain can even think, let alone know all things, no QPT 4. Omnipotent, do we know that a being made of no parts can be all powerful, no QPT 5. Omnipresence, do we know if it is possible for a single being to be everywhere at one time, no QPT 6. Independent from all things, do we know if it is possible for a living thing not to rely on energy input to live, this is also a violation of the conservation of energy, is that a know PT, no QPT As with the Easter Bunny, I'm trying to focus on the primary traits of the beings in question. In the case of Yahweh, we have 6 primary traits. Unlike the Easter Bunny, there are no traits for Yahweh that are traits that we know can exist. Multiplying traits. With each additional qualifier we add to any item, living or otherwise, the item becomes less probable. Lets see how this works. For simplicity sake, lets imagine someone behind a door with unknown traits. We are going to assign traits to them, in this example we will have only two options for each category, each option will be equally probable. Person A is behind a door, sex-male, hair color-brown, eye color brown. Keep in mind these are all PTs. Now we wish to determine the likely hood that we are correct. male(.5)xhairbrown(.5)xeyebrown(.5)=.125 The likely hood that we have correctly determined the traits of person A is 12.5%. This is based on only a few traits, that are also known PT. Lets add a few more traits to person A, heights 6 foot, skin color black. For simplicities sake, we will continue to assume only two equally valid options for each category. What happens now? M(.5)xHB(.5)xEB(.5)xH(.5)xSB(.5)=.0312. With two PT add to person A, we see the likely hood of them having all traits drops to 3.12% as traits are compounded the probability of the item declines. If we compare the claimed traits of the Easter Bunny with the claimed traits of Yahweh, we see that the Easter Bunny has fewer claimed traits, and if all other things are equal, this would make the Easter Bunny more probable. In fairness on this point, anyone could add more traits to either group and change the claim. I tried to stick with what is considered the primary traits and how additional traits reduce the probability of the claimed thing possessing all of them. In conclusion, it is more rational to believe in the existence of the Easter Bunny then the existence of Yahweh for the following reasons. 1. Half of the Easter Bunny's primary traits are traits that we know can exist in our reality. 2. All of the traits claimed to exist in the being Yahweh are traits that we cannot confirm to be available traits in our reality, they may very well be impossible traits. 3. Yahweh has more claimed traits then the Easter Bunny, the more claimed traits the less likely it is that that being exists. It is more rational to believe in the Easter Bunny then the god of the Jews/Christians/Muslims, Yahweh, because the Easter Bunny has few traits and some of the traits claimed to exist in the Easter Bunny are traits we know can exist. This places the probability of the existence of the Easter Bunny in a stronger position then Yahweh. Therefore it is more rational to believe the Eater Bunny exist than Yahweh. I thank my opponent for taking the time to read my argument and look forward to their response. I would like to remind the responder that this is a comparison between the Easter Bunny and Yahweh. The responder doesn't need to argue that it is rational to believe in Yahweh, that may be true. The responder needs to argue that it isn't more rational to believe in the Easter Bunny than Yahweh. I believe I've presented an argument that confirms it is more rational to believe in the Easter Bunny. Thank you.