BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
I win every debate because people forfeit

Your debate is that I'm flawed?? That is your debate? I already explained to you the forfeit reasoning of being a quitter and a loser. And so what you will just have no real debate and will just reply to prove a point that you will not forfeit. Wow great debate there buddy FAIL. Ok then, you have one round left to tell me why young people are not stupid when it comes to life. I'm going to argue that they are stupid because they don't have any life skills, only text book knowledge but no experience in real life that is why they can't find jobs because of lack of experience. Young people today only know tech stuff but have no clue on basic life things like changing a tire, or fixing a furnace or reading a map, they depend on technology and if you left that person in a forest without wifi or internet and youtube to look stuff up, they would not be able to function. They wouldn't even know how to start a fire without a lighter or build shelter. Without their phones young people are lost. So there tell me I'm wrong Debate that for your last round unless you want to forfeit and then I win and prove my point once again
I win every debate because people forfeit

A forfeit is like a loss, because you have given up and choose not to participate in the debate anymore, therefore you lose. The other person can not continue because they have to wait for your argument and you gave up. Therefore you lose. It's like in sports, lets say tennis, you quit because of an injury, the other person moves on and you are out. Now the ball is in your court, you have 3 days to ponder a response or challenge me to a debate on a relative current events topic or personal opinion or whatever, lets just keep it adult oriented, I don't want to discuss power rangers or pokemon or which superhero is better like the 14 year old challengers that usually want to debate, how their favorite color is red and they are cooler. Serious debates only. If you forfeit, I will win again!!
I win every debate because people forfeit

I will win this debate also because everyone that wants to challenge me forfeits. So pick a topic and let's go, I know you will chicken out and leave this site or have no comeback from my reply and to me forfeiting is like losing the debate. So bring it on child. Lets try to stick to something concrete, I don't want to debate Pikachu or whether you believe in curses. Bring it!!
final fantasy 7 should be remade

So you wish me to elaborate well elaborate I shall so how did it kill mass effect well it sold out, I told you before its so hard to find a guy would give a leg and arm for.(figure of speech) Yet when I go to like gamestop I still see mass effect on the shelfs, and dont say its a new game when FF7 came out it went like hotcakes! Now so Added storyline would also beat the socks off your so called ultimate formula well for starters do you know how fast that game is i beat it under what 2-3. So easys and that was one very hard mode not very hard so i got bored after beating it after 4-5 times. Also on another note you tibit about the manipulate the story well thats a load of bull take it form me i have beat the game 5 times. Wow I controlled if this guy die or this girl or to be a jerk and shoot people on sight, well so what that does change the story. In the end we still end up kill the bad guy and saving the day the only thing you change in minimal. So to this statment i say Objection! "The story potential is nearly limitless and hard to upset the player" No its no limitless its more accrute to say its limited Now your gender conclusion is crap ok for one there are out of 10 gamers one is a girl this is common knowlage, and also what girl plays a sci fi game.Therefore there no real reason to make money off this part of you formula, Because even if there is its rare really rare. So Ultimate Formula my ace.
final fantasy 7 should be remade

--------->RE: Ah mass effect that was a great game but final fantasy 7 was a best seller compared to mass effect, final fantasy 7 just kills it . And? How is FF7 a superior game to Mass Effect? How exactly does it kill it? I would request that my opponent elaborate. It's true that FF7 was the game of it's time, but as was Tetris and Pacman, yet one cannot honestly expect that remaking those games on the current consoles would guarantee the same performance. -------->RE:"Maybe even some extra storyline and may be a more gamepaly and some easter eggs it would be the best." Once more, I'd like my opponent to elaborate. How would adding some more gameplay, storyline and easter eggs trump the RPG formula I've described in R1? -------->RE:"im kinda tried of final fantasy branching off into a whole differnt story, i wished they would branch some off that the same story like final fantasy 7 ." My opponent may be tired, but unless he prove that the masses have the same mindset as him (which clearly, they don't, given that FF has constantly been able to use different stories while being successful), then this claim is of no relevance. -------->RE:".Now i know they made crisis core and it was good but i want to know what happens after 7 ." If it be my opponent's true concern to know what happens after 7, then not only can the formula I cited in R1 still be applied, but this wouldn't constitute as a remake of FF7, hence upholding my side of the resolution. -------->RE:"Maybe a game were every charater from final fantasy come and meet to help a common cause or something." Again, such a claim merely upholds my side of the resolution. And off topic, but the game in the video somewhat fulfills the desires which PRO has: http://www.youtube.com... So basically, PRO has not upheld his side of the resolution and is essentially impeding the debate. Ergo, you have no reason to consider any of what he has currently said when determining your vote.
final fantasy 7 should be remade

Ah mass effect that was a great game but final fantasy 7 was a best seller compared to mass effect, final fantasy 7 just kills it . I mean you can barely find the game anymore its almost impossable.The only thing i dont like about final fantasy 7 is the graphics's what if you take it make a better final fantasy with E3 graphic's it would be awsome. Maybe even some extra storyline and may be a more gamepaly and some easter eggs it would be the best. im kinda tried of final fantasy branching off into a whole differnt story, i wished they would branch some off that the same story like final fantasy 7 .Now i know they made crisis core and it was good but i want to know what happens after 7 . Maybe a game were every charater from final fantasy come and meet to help a common cause or something.
final fantasy 7 should be remade

My case shall be short and sweet. Although Final Fantasy 7 is indeed a fun game, Squaresoft should focus on the future of the company rather than living off the past. Rather than remake FF7, Squaresoft should compete with the Mass Effect series by taking Final Fantasy in a new direction. Indeed, what made Mass Effect so successful is the amount of control players had over the game. Gender Control: In Mass Effect, players go to choose their gender. I'm sure I speak for many when I say that I prefer to play as characters that line up with my own gender. One of the reasons I am not too excited to play the 13th FF game is simply because the main character is a female. In RPG games which individuals devote many hours to, they commonly prefer to be able to relate to their characters. By going the route of Mass Effect, this problem would be solved. Not to mention that players have control over the characters appearance (ethnicity, hair style/color, etc) Personality control: Lets face it: No matter what the main character is like, people will be having gripes with his/her personality. Many players hate Cloud because they perceive him as being "emo" whereas many hate Tidus and Vaan due to their immaturity. In the Mass Effect series, players not only had the opportunity to choose what kind of upbringing their main character had, but also had control over all the choices their character made in the game. In this way, players won't be bothered by the main character given that they will have absolute control over his/her personality. Story Control: As suggested above, players had the ability to manipulate the story as well as its conclusion due to being able to decide the choices the main character could make. Just imagine how awesome this would have been in Final Fantasy 12. Vaan could have decided to put the "moves" on Ashe or even help Ashe take over Avalice rather than save it. The story potential is nearly limitless and hard to upset the player given that it is the player who is in control (though for the purpose of keeping the player surprised, control is not absolute, hence why players may only effect decisions that concern the main protagonist). At any rate, this also adds customization of romances to occur in the game. Hence, imagine a Final Fantasy 7 where you (as Cloud) got to hook up with Tifa if you willed it. Or imagine a Final Fantasy 10 where their could have been some action between Tidus and LuLu (yowzer). Again, the benefits the player is given are extraordinary in comparison to the usual Final Fantasy formula. Conclusion: Given that SquareSoft is in need of a superior formula if it hopes to compete with games on the level of Mass Effect or Knights of the Old Republic and that there is more game play potential in the formula which the aforementioned games used, Square Soft should insist on heading in that direction rather than merely live off its past and attract merely those who are interested in FF7 rather than RPGs in general. And that'll do it for now.
Is science and religion the same thing just a deferent way of telling the story

A1: The ability to changeThrough tests, experiments and studies, science may alter or add to existing knowledge. This does not happen within religion. Once the religious doctrines/knowledge have been finalised, the doctrines/knowledge will not be changed. For example, Islam has “The Quran [as] the holy book which Muslims recite and turn to for guidance ... Its verses have remained intact since their original revelation by God in the 7th century” [1].Reference[1] http://tinyurl.com...
Is science and religion the same thing just a deferent way of telling the story

My opponent has the BoP. A1: Is versus ought Science focuses on what is: science is descriptive. For example, the Big Bang Theory is an explanation of how the universe came to be. Religion is sometimes focused on the descriptive, but will become focused on the prescriptive in other areas, the latter of which science does not do. For example, Catholic Moral Theology specifies “how one is to act” in regards to “medical ethics, sexual ethics” etc [1]. Reference [1] http://tinyurl.com...
Come Hard With Your Bars V *Unveiling*

DDO is f-cking with my rhymes heavilydysfunctional websiteI'm spittin' my hatred for fakers who lost once alreadybut continue to wear it and raise praise and some meritstrying to face me, face of a ferretI scare you and run sh-tI'm munchin'on munchkinsseasoned with pumpkinI'm a breeze in Hurricane katrinamultiplied by Irma and acceleratedby the sneeze of god himselfand I rap with such speedthat Lucifer and satan are brought down on both kneesand they cough and wheezeas I knock the air out of their lungsand give 'em brainfreezeI'd say I'm dangerous like some 12th century fleas
Come Hard With Your Bars V *Unveiling*

Come Hard With Your Bars Part V! Proudly Presenting Part V in The Ever-Expanding Series! Rules: 1. ABSOLUTELY NO STEALING ACCEPTABLE, BREAKING THIS RULE MEANS INSTANT DISQUALIFICATION 2. Should be judged on wordplay and rhyme schemes/word choice 3. Be as savage as you can/want, no holds barred 4. Use as much of the word limit as you want Celebrating the return of Come Hard With Your Bars I am unveiling a new idea for a group I'd like to start, seeing as everyone else is doing it. Introduce DDO to.... The Wordsmiths I will accept anyone, but there are terms for entry 1: A qualification rap battle with either me or a trusted recruiter (Rap Battles with me in the past do count as qualification) 2: Must be active, I will have a relatively weak quota of at least one battle per month More information can be attained by commenting or PMing me about our goals and ambitions as a group! Start you bars in your round 1 argument, and remember. Come Hard With Your Bars
Art and Music Classes Should Be Banned In The United States Educational System

I don't think art and music classes should be banned at all. School is a place to learn, it's not just a place to learn about math and science and all the boring subjects. Those who want to learn how to draw or learn how to play an instrument, it's the perfect class for them. It's also very hard to fail these classes, if you suck at drawing just ask the teacher for help, they're there for a reason, same with music classes. If you are not good at playing an instrument at all, just take art, if you can't draw but can sing a little or just play an instrument a little, then music class is for you. Plus who knows, at the end you may even like it, and would want to practise even more. Also there are many creative people, banning these classes will just crush their dreams, and if you're an artistic person, taking the classes will help you a lot for Art school and even for Universities and Colleges. I wouldn't say ban them, I would mostly say make them optional. Also I apologize if there are any grammar and spelling problems. I sort of rushed through this.
Art and Music Classes Should Be Banned In The United States Educational System

I think that art and music classes should be banned in the United States Educational System for a couple of reasons. During my argument I will explain to you why I think that art and music classes should be banned in the U.S., (United States,) Educational System. School is a place for learning, not drawing and singing. This brings me to my first point, having art and music classes takes away from the time students could be learning important and useful things. For example, you have a student who is doing poorly in Math and doesn't really enjoy having to take work home. Now, if we took art and music classes out of schools, the classes would be longer so the student will have more time in class to work on homework and talk to the teacher about the work. My second reason is, some students are not very good at art or music. These students could fail the classes, I don't think that you can really grade art, but the teachers have to grade it. Also, if these students are bad at art and the teachers don't like the students art, the students can't really improve on their art. Then in music class, some students aren't good at music either, which could result in failing the class. Now, every school district has a different number of classes you can fail, but still pass the grade. So if a student failed art and music, they could fail the grade too. If a smart student failed art and music that would ruin their chances of getting into a good college, and that could ruin their lives. So, do you really want students failing in school because of un-educational classes? Thank you for reading my argument, I hope you enjoyed it.
Animals should not be used in circuses.

I do not believe that animals should be in the circus at all. They belong out in the wild not caged up and on trains traveling place to place. The training is also in humane. The lions and tigers get hit with whips and do not belong to live in small cages. Animals fear the trainers they are wild animals and are unpredictable. It isn't fair to them. I say we just ban circuses in general the animals don't deserve it. If someone wants to go see animals go to a zoo. At least they don't get beat for no reason and have friends.
Animals should not be used in circuses.

The use of animals in circuses should be banned. I say this because we don"t realize what the animals actually go through. They are treated with merciless physical punishment such as being beat or whipped and are in chains or locked up for most of their life when they are not performing. In all animal circuses, animals such as lions, tigers and elephants, are physically forced to do ridiculous tricks that they don"t understand. Physical punishment is used as a training method. The animals are brutally beaten and whipped, shocked with electrical prods and in some cases have their teeth and claws removed. Tigers are naturally afraid of fire but never the less, are still made to jump through fiery hoops and have been burnt while doing so. Animals are not made for the circus and should not be made to live under these extremely harsh conditions.
Animals should not be used in circuses.

Animals deserve to be treated with respect. Not confined in small spaces or tortured with whips and sharp objects. It"s not unlikely that animals used in circuses can break loose . This is often caused by extremities of abuse that they can't take any more, so they snap and harm a lot of people who happen to get in the way. The circus is a place for acrobats, clowns and magicians. Not animals. They've had enough of this cruel, punishing life and just want to live how they should, which is not as a circus clown. It is in the wild where they are properly taken care of and have everything they need. Face it guys, the circus just isn't meant for animals.
Animals should not be used in circuses.

96% of a circus animal"s life is spent locked up in cages and chains. They can stay like that for up to 26 hours straight. This is not fair. Staying in confined spaces like this can be the cause of foot infections and arthritis also leading to the death of many circus animals. In July 2004, a lion named Clyde was travelling with a circus across a desert where the temperatures reached up to 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Clyde died in a poorly ventilated boxcar. The circus life is just not meant for animals.
God does not exist.

I apologize to con, for my deffiniton and source for Existence. The definition was actually for the word "Exist."-http://www.merriam-webster.com... Moving on, thoughts do not exist. Anything thought by humans, that cannot be physically measured, does not exist. Our thoughts only belong to us. Even if the thought is communicated, our thought have no physical value. Morality is the principals of right or wrong. Morality is a thought. It does not contain any physical value. That does not mean that we act, and follow our thoughts. But the thought itself, contains no real physical value. (Source-http://www.huffingtonpost.com...) "I have not asserted that one requires religious belief in order to be moral." The deffiniton of religion is: "the belief in a god or in a group of gods" (http://www.merriam-webster.com...) Humans are the only self aware, intelligent, creatures on earth and are therefore the only animals capable of inventing deities and religion. Animals (besides human), do not have the capability to believe in a higher power. Yet, they still work together to survive and they have the principals not to kill each other. Based on the definition religion, it is the belief of god, or a group of gods. We have never seen animals worshiping god, so it is safe to conclude animals disbelief in a higher power. "It is possible that a maximally great being exists." This is what the debate is about. Based on the title, it is "God does NOT exist"." Not, "The probability of god existing." "If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists in in some possible world." The question is not the possibility of god existing. The title is "God does NOT exist" "Pro has taken this round to produce unnecessary definitions (at least one of which does not match what was found in Pro's cited source), bring irrelevant topics into the discussion (i.e. Hinduism)" It seems like con must have misunderstood me. Hinduism was one of the earliest religions. It came before the age of enlightenment (a time of which many scientific discoveries were made). The same applies to Christianity and Islam. So, because many early religions came before major scientific discoveries, it is very likely that many statements presented in the religions are incorrect. Again, my apologies for my citation. The citation was actually for the word "Exist". Not "Existence," Good luck.
agnostic=let the mysterius content of the ufo, stay a mystery

As defined by Google (and referrenced originally from dictionary.con), agnostic can and is defined as:"one who believes it impossible to know anything about God or about the creation of the universe and refrains from commitment to any religious doctrine. An atheist is one who denies the existence of a deity or of divine beings." [1] UFOs clearly have nothing to do with this. [1]https://www.google.co.uk...
If God ran for World Leader, he would fail.

Vote Yaho! He is the only candidate offering real change in a world desperately seeking divine leadership. As you, the world, are considering who to vote for world leader this fall recognize that Yaho is the only candidate you can trust, love, and only through him can you be saved…from high taxes and bad governance! 3 major components of Yaho's platform are as follows: 1) World Reproduction Bureau: Everything anyone could ever need when it comes to reproduction. As it is the very first commandment in the OT, ("Be fruitful and multiply") Yaho places a special importance on reproduction, and therefore wants to facilitate it to the fullest abilities of the World Government. The World Reproduction Bureau will provide information, assistance, and any service one could need with regards to reproduction. WRB clinics will be placed around the world and provide, free of charge, any service related to facilitating reproduction that is requested. The WRB will provide a universally needed service, and a foundation for future global economic stability. 2) Mandatory global closure of business on the 7th day of the week Vote for Yaho, and guarantee yourself a day of rest. 3) Yaho will conform to a generally libertarian governing ideology, as to allow the maximum usage of freewill by his worldwide constituency. Various regions can maintain their laws and customs without much interference from the World's Central Governing offices. I look forward to justifying/explaining these policies and platforms as well as advancing others as my opponent and I debate this interesting resolution.