Gun ownership is a absolute right and should not be regulated

No, those sources were not there in round 2, you came up with them now, go see round 2. Also, even if you could prove that Ronald Reagan said that, it is irrelevant, just because Reagan thought something doesn’t mean that I have to, or that he is necessarily right. It’s like if I provided a quote from Mussolini saying that people should be able to own any gun they want, you don’t have to believe it just because you are a fascist and he is a role model of your beliefs, any more than I have to believe what Reagan believed because I am a libertarian-conservative. Your analogy of seat belts does not apply here, this would be like passing a law saying that you can’t run around waiving a gun unsafely, but what you seem to be advocating for is banning large trucks because terrorists could use them to run over 80 people. There is a big difference between cars and guns though, such as how the right to bear arms is protected under the constitution but the right to bear cars is not, also the right to bear arms preserves our liberties, whereas cars only get you from A to B faster. Think about it, say some maniac wants to blow up a school, how the hell is he going to afford a bazooka? Only militias would be able to afford those. Now let’s assume that he does get a bazooka, then walks into a school where the teachers or receptionists own guns, he pulls out his bazooka, and gets his head blown off. There were no guards with guns in Orlando; I don’t know where you dug that up. No, it really isn’t your concern what guns I own, just build a wall and get yourself guns to defend yourself, No one is going to attack you with a bazooka if they know that you have one too. And if I go on a reign of terror, do you honestly think that the militias will let that happen? No, I don’t think so. And besides, I could say that you don’t need a car because you could go crazy and run over 100 people, you could crash into people’s houses and kill them all then drive away before anyone can stop you. We don’t ban cars do we? Obesity kills far more people than gun violence, in fact 18% of all deaths in the US are caused by obesity, but we don’t try and “regulate” how many big macs people eat do we? The thing that would prevent militias from getting too powerful is separation, if there are 3 major militias, combined they may be able to take down the government with civilian help, but alone they are too week. I think this has a great deal to do with boots, if I kicked you with my boot, does that make my boot an “assault boot?” You seem to be avoiding this question, you also seem to be misunderstanding the second amendment, the point is not only to be able to defend your liberties from intruders, it is also to be able to defend your liberties from your own government, which clearly sets a need for military grade weapons of war. And no, we are not talking about gun violence only, crime in general reduces when gun ownership increases, whereas gun killings alone increase. But this isn’t much of a plus, less shootings but more of them are of guns or more killings but at least that guy got killed by a knife not a gun! You seem to be trying to sound absurd, would you rather have 7 deaths where 2 of the victims were killed by guns or only 4 killings where 3 of them are by guns? Most schools shooters were spoiled brats by the way, which were a lot harder to come by in 1955, so there were not too many school shootings. You also seem to be skipping over how the point of the second amendment was that the Federal Government became tyrannous we could over throw it, you also seem to be skipping over how the founding fathers established the second amendment “that every man should own a gun.”