Capitolism is much better than Communism

Thanks for a quick response, loving this debate so far. I'm going to be defending my case from some critiques that my opponent made, but not their own defenses, since that wouldn't be fair.-----"I haven't seen any rich person be generated out of a communist country."That's because their extra wealth is taken and given to those that need it most. You work for what you get; if you need food, and you work for it, you get it. Just because you don't get to keep $500 billion that was made by exploiting the earth and its people doesn't mean that communism isn't a good theory."Also, I will say that communism looks good on paper."Thanks for conceding, because that's what we are debating. Look at the definitions I gave, and it specifically says the theory of communism. "[list of countries that practiced communism and some random statistics]"Two things: you didn't specify what that "65 million in the People's Rebuplic in China" means, and if we infer that you mean death tolls, then that is irrelevant, since we are not debating on the implementation of communism, we are debating on whether it is a good theory or not. "I won't blame the genocide on communism, but it still happens in communist countries. "Then don't say that there was genocide... there was genocide in the USA during the 1900's towards the Japanese immigrants that came to this country, so we must say that this argument is invalid."If you want to play the idealistic game, fine communism and socialism would have been the top ideologies."Thanks for conceding, that's exactly what we're debating."And, if my opponent's model is realistic, than how come Stalin, Mao, Castro, Kosygin, Chi Minh got all the luxuries that they needed"That's implementation flaws, not ideological. They got them since they abused the system, and any system can be abused, but in capitalism it is so much easier to do so than communism. "America never committed genocide like this."Study Japanese Internment before WWI, and you can see that this "fact" that you stated is completely wrong."They have industries such as Sony, Nintendo, Toshiba, Capcom, and Sega. The total profits that all of these companies have made is 101 billion dollars."How is this relevant..."My opponent admits this is idealistic communism, because it is absurd to put this model in the real world."I admitted that it is idealistic, because we are debating idealistic, not implemented communism. "irrelevant because of the amount of genocide and amount of hypocrisy that happened in Russia"Okay, back up. I'm not saying that I condone what Russia did at this time, or do I condone what the US did during Japanese Internment, but this argument is invalid. A country can have a bad social standing (in this example, murdering citizens), but it can have a positive economic one. Saying that the two are related is like saying that "because the USA has capitalism, then the people must be happy and there must be no bad social standings!". Yeah, you can't say that without being looked at weird." those who support the theory of communism should go and live in one of these countries.":o Well, if you support the theory of capitalism, then you should go and live in the USA during 1899. Good luck finding a job that doesn't have the risk of snapping off your arms in a rotor-saw."My opponent claims that capitalism is a few people that are in charge of others doing nothing."Look at the Koch brothers, then get back to me with this argument. "My opponent uses the internet, but communism never could get close to building the internet"My opponent probably used free or reduced lunch while in school, but capitalism would never have people that could get a discount off of lunch! Irrelevant."China and North Korea censor the Internet."The USA tried to as well, just look at SOPA."If you agree with communism, than you are either not being intellectually honest or are too blind.":o not nice </3Vote pro and vote against the abuses of people and the earth, vote for a just society, with a just economic system, an economic system that allows for those that are underpriveledged or diseased to recieve treatment, and a system that believes in the good of the people.