God is a serial Killer and enjoys hot chocolate

Interesting rebuttal. It is not to be underestimated. I see now that I will have to work this out a bit better as I feel my previous response concerning chocolate may have been inefficient. I think Jesus would've enjoyed a chocolate drink as much as he enjoyed turning water into wine at a wedding feast. He said of himself, "The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and "sinners."'"Now you can glut on chocolate and get too fat, just as you can overindulge in alcohol and get drunk, so I recommend moderation here. Whatever you eat, eat unto the Lord.Jesus liked good food, and he even used food to symbolize himself, calling the Passover flatbread and wine his Body and Blood. He chose this food to memorialize his death on the cross, where he paid the price for your sins and mine. After he rose again, he broke bread before his disciples, and also cooked them fish for breakfast. With that said, I would now like to point out that Occam's razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony" or "law of succinctness"): "entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem", roughly translated as "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity". This is often paraphrased as "All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood. Originally a tenet of the reductionist philosophy of nominalism, it is more often taken today as a heuristic maxim (rule of thumb) that advises economy, parsimony, or simplicity, often or especially in scientific theories. Thus, my opponent's argument on this matter is all but true. For those who have read this far, in accordance to what False reality has suggested in the experiment, I have one more request of you when posting in the comment section. In your comment, you are to use a word the rhymes with "duck" when referring to this debate. Now with that said, I've had to say that there is no emotion, there is peace, there is no ignorance, there is Knowledge. There is no passion, there is Serenity. There is no death, there is the force. Getting back to the matter of serial killers, we must take into account what a cerial killer can be. For instance, I would imagine that a cerial killer is one who kills cerial. Naturally, if God were to eat cerial, he would be killing it such as how when a Spider eats a fly, it is killing it Given that breakfast is strongly associated with developing one's mind (as well as the fact that most people eat cerial for breakfast) and given that God's mind is suggested to be infinitely expansive due to omniscience, it is likely that god is indeed a massive cerial killer. Of course, all of this is besides to point. What truly matters is the intensity of the hot chocolate. For how could hot chocolate be hot to even God. This goes back to the earlier theory which I proposed concerning dark matter. Indeed, it would be far to suppose that dark matter is truly dark chocolate and that the purpose of the various suns are to heat up the dark matter/chocolate. This way, the chocolate will be to God's liking and he can enjoy it by universal proportions. Furthermore, we must question the purpose of black holes in the universe. Well ladies and gentleman, there is a logical explanation. The Black holes are in fact God's mouth. And he has to have multiple mouths since he is omnipresent. Since both dark matter/chocolate as well as light stars can be absorbed by a black hole, we can safely conclude once more that God can drink hot chocolate. Moving on, I believe what my opponent states on the matter of global warming is false as we could just as easily develop underwater cities to counter global warming. If we had underwater civilizations that could sustain the effects of the pressure at the bottom of the sea, we wouldn't have to worry about global warming being a problem to us as the seal level rising would have no crucial impact on people who lived underwater. We could have our domiciles in underwater domes. Furthermore, since 75% of the planet is made up of water, that would just be more space for us and overpopulation would be somewhat nullified for a while. This is indeed a flawless approach to eliminating global warming, contrary to what my opponent spouts as proof for his case. Although the details change somewhat over the years, Spider-Man's costume, with a few notable exceptions, remains fairly consistent. The standard is a form-fitting spandex bodysuit, which from the waist down is blue, except for mid-calf boots with a black web pattern on a red background. From the waist up, the fabric is a red-and-black web pattern, except for his back, sides, and insides of his upper arms, which are blue. There is a large red spider outline on his back, and a smaller black spider emblem on his chest. The back spider has changed over the years, featuring a spider with a bit smaller feet in the past. The mask has white one-way mirror type lenses rimmed with black. (The white portions of the mask's eyes sometimes "squint" when Peter has his eyes partly shut. Whether this is his mask actually changing in response to his eyelids moving, or artistic license, is not clear.) In addition to covering his entire head, thereby leaving no distinguishing features, the mask also muffles his voice, making it unrecognizable. The boots are composed of a thin material that allows Spider-Man's adhering ability to work through the soles of his feet. The boots, mask, and gloves can be folded up and stored inside a pocket while the remainder of his costume can be worn under his civilian clothes. Also, I find it quite questionable that CON would use this website as proof of his case. Everyone knows that the webmaster of this webpage obsessively monitors these debates, and pays particular attention to debates that ridicule the webpage, to see what users are saying. If a user criticizes the webmaster, creator, or anyone affiliated with the website for the way it is run and the rediculous practices employed by said people involved with this site, the comment is immediately deleted, and the user's account is deleted. This has happened to countless individuals I have spoken to on chat groups on aol, google, yahoo, and youtube. This isn't a rumor, or a vendetta against anyone; it is an absolute fact. The people who run this site want you to debate certain things, by their rules. If you want to debate something even slightly controversial, outside of their conservative parameters, your account is immediately deleted. If you bring up religion in a negative light, criticize a group (particularly a conservative group), discuss sex, even in responsible ways, your account is deleted and comments erased. Finally, and most importantly, it is absolutely necessary that we question what is truly the fruits of a serial killer. Serialkiller Alexander Pichushkin, after he was accused of killing 48 people, came back to the Moscow courtroom and said he was "almost God" and had the power to decide who was to live and who was to die, and that he enjoyed hot chocolate. This is irrefutable evidence for my position. With that said, I've shown all I've needed to show to prove my case. I now await the final round.