If there is another civil war likely North vs South who wins? I say South.

First off Michigan no that is by and large Republican, Republican House, Republican Senate, Republican Governor and is looking like its going to elect its first Republican US Senator in many years, I know this, the only Democratic thing is who was elected as President and most of those votes were carried by Wayne County. Well I would say Michigan is democrat, because that is what the majority of citizena vote. They even had a women governor. Definitely Democrat. Plus, it's surrounded by Union states, so it would not likely join the confederacy anyways. Ok, I did not by any means say why Robert E. Lee was in the North because as we all know the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania was a free state so he had no intention of persuading them. The man made it deep into the Union, lets honestly sit back and look at the facts. No, but this was another attempt at persuasion. He thought that having a massive confederate victory in union territory would convince american senators of the cost of war too high enough. Obviously, he failed in doing so. At last check, going past Washington D. C. , through Maryland and into Pennsylvania is a little more than smalladvances. As soon as confrontation happened though, they were turned back. In reference to the military installations in Florida, this is largely irrelevant a simple look at the most recent Gallup poll has the Military Approval Rating of Obama at 37%. .. 37% is not going to win you a war. Since when was this civil war about Obama and where is your source? I was sure the civil war was democrat vs republican. Even though the military may not be 100% blue, that does not mean they would turn. In fact Florida would be surrounded so it would be rendered useless. It is a peninsula. It might be blockaded, but many of our strongest naval bases are situated in blue states. It would force the confederates to redirect a front to the florida peninsula, which is a disadvantage. When we go to manufacturing the South has a huge industrial base now in the form of automobile factories, and electronics, it has the same manufacturing base that the North had and the North, well as we know has declined in its manufacturing capacity with the only state that has seen significant recovery being Michigan, with a large population and the Largest 5 Branch Military Base in the World for the US it has a huge advantage, and you see the population doesn't matter when the people don't want to fight. I am starting to sense you are from Michigan. Anyways, the north still has a larger industrial output then the south. Have you ever been to Ohio or New Jersey. Those are the smelliest and industilized places in America. Indiana, New york, and California also are extremely industrial. In summary, the midwest and the north east are loaded with rich agriculture and industry. In regards to auto industry, that is centered in Michigan, a predominantly blue state. . http://www.infoplease.com... . http://www.netstate.com...; As we all know liberals aren't known to be fighters they only talk loud and hope others don't respond, tolerance, tolerance, until someone doesn't agree so don't forget that you would probably see a large influx of the rich moving to Red States if Civil War did happen as we all know many wealthy are conservative. I did not realize how bias my opponent was until now. My opponent has not used sufficient arguments advocating that the red states would win. The arguments he did make, were too illogical to consider. His potrayal that the south would win, because they have better religious values, is silly. Here is a secret my friend, the bible condenms any form of killing. My opponent relied on Michigan way too much in trying to prove his point, when he could of fucused on many other pressing issues. Such as the southern, western, and eastern fronts surrounding the confederate states. He gave no strategy, or plan of action, on how these states would win, besides stating that they are largely industrial.