If God does exist, he is evil. (Abrahamic god)

Hello good sir, it is a pleasure to meet and debate this topic with you. First, I must start off by defining the word "evil". Evil: profoundly immoral and malevolent. Now, very bad things happen to innocent people everyday, as we all know. I will now give you a hypothetical everyday example and explain the role God plays in it. It would be pointless to argue that things like this don't happen everyday, in which the end result is a murder or rape of an innocent person, because all you have to do is read the news. There is a woman and her son walking down a street. A rapist comes behind the mother, grabs her, forces her down and rapes her. A murderer comes behind the son and slits his throat. Now, I will express what is known and said about God. He is omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent. Since he is omniscient, he is all knowing, therefore knowing that that woman is getting raped and her son is getting murdered. Hell, he knows what's going to happen before the rapist and murderer even think about committing such crimes. Since he is omnipresent, he is right there, watching it happen, witnessing the mother getting raped and the son get murdered, yet, he allows this to happen. One could argue that God doesn't want to interfere with freewill, and that God gave humans the power to choose to do evil things. First of all, in the Bible, God performs miracles, which is indeed interfering with freewill. Okay. Keep in mind, if God performs a miracle and interferes and stops the rapist from raping the woman, and the murder from murdering her son, 2 people's freewill be affected (the murderer's and rapist's). If he does nothing, 2 people's freewill will be affected (the mother's and her son's ). Whether he chooses to help or not, at least 2 people's freewill will be affected. Therefore, him not doing anything is taking the murderer's and rapist's side in the situation, therefor favoring evil. Those who favor evil over good are evil beings. One could also argue that in the end the rapist and murderer will go to Hell so they will learn their lesson. This is illogical because you can't learn a lesson if you're dead. And will the rapists and murderer's torture in Hell un-rape her, and un-murder her son? No. And being burned in Hell for eternity still won't teach them why it's wrong to murder and rape. So that right there is pointless. Why doesn't an all-good doing god put some type of action into place to make the murder and rapist realize that what they were about to do to these people was wrong, so that they themselves, could possibly go out and teach other people why it's wrong to do such things, and actually start a chain of goodness and understanding? There is no lesson to be learned because it isn't like you can commit rapes and murders anymore once you're dead. But, as God would have it: A woman raped, a boy murdered, and two men tortured forever. What do you think Superman would do? Do you think Superman would allow this and not stop the rapist and murderer? God is supposed to be good, Superman is supposed to be good. Why are they on two different sides of the saving? Just a week or so ago there was a story of a grandmother who killed her baby granddaughter with a sludge hammer. Where was God during this? Right there watching it. Why? Why does he allow the deaths of innocent children? Everything that happens is a result of God because he can choose whether or not he will interfere, and everything that happens is within God's "plan" (which actually contradicts humanity's 'freewill'). God's plan requires the deaths of children and innocent people, God = Good. Hitler's plan requires the deaths of children and innocent people, Hitler = Bad. It is the same thing, yet one being is looked at as good, and the other is looked at as bad. God is like Hitler, just like Hitler, because he allowed Hitler to carry out his plans. His inaction, is action. Surely an omnibenevolent god wouldn't allow evil that seems so pointless. There is no point in killing a baby, and a child that dies of cancer, or a baby that is smashed to death with a sludge hammer will never be stronger, for their tribulation...they will die from it. It's absolutely pointless. I'm not saying he needs to get rid of every evil and hardship, but he allows excessive, pointless evil, like what happened in the everyday scenario I described above, or the baby that was beaten to death with a sludge hammer. What good will come of that? Him, being an all-powerful god, could stop it effortlessly, yet he does nothing about it. Another thing: there is an issue with God's consistency. When that off-duty police officer stopped that mass murder in December 2012 in San Antonio, people called that a miracle (because people often attribute miracles to him), but just this year over 3,000 people were killed by Typhoon Haiyan. Let's say that God did have something to do with this. He saved a few people by putting a cop in the right place at the right time, yet at Sandy Hook several children were murdered. He allows Hannah Anderson's rescue from her kidnapper, yet allows Typhoon Haiyan to kill 3,000 people. My issue is that theists put God in a "win-win" situation. If 8 year old Roy Barns survives being shot in the head, it's a miracle. If Tommy Young's uncle dies from being shot in the head, it's "God works in mysterious ways". So, he allows unnecessary evils to happen to some people, but not to others. The fact that he allows pointless evil that he can easily prevent is proof enough that he is evil: profoundly immoral and malevolent. I look forward to your response. Sources: http://www.youtube.com... http://www.cnn.com... http://www.cbsnews.com... http://townhall.com...