God is real

The opposition says that using science is invalid to refute their claims, to say such is to say that all of the progress humans have made in the past several hundred years is invalid, science is how we have the technology we have now, how we have such advanced medicine and how we understand the universe as it is, while there is still much to make sense of, science has explained everything better than religion ever has. As for the article provided here: http://www.wnd.com... The article even states that the whereabouts of this "chariot wheel" are currently unknown, and the fact the diver didn't take it with him raises suspicions, almost like they knew examining the item further than a photo would reveal it as something else. From the photo provided in the article, it cannot positively be identified to any degree to being a chariot wheel. https://scienceandbelief.org... This article here is nothing but a scientist who is religious, believing in something that completely goes against his occupation, it proves nothing regarding my arguments with turning water into wine and the Red Sea parting. It defies all scientific explanation, he states, because it did not happen, which is what I assert and such has yet to be proven to have actually happened. http://askjohnmackay.com... This article suggests that Jesus Christ turned water into wine by creating carbon from nothing, which is just as ludicrous as what he was trying to explain reasonably. Unfortunately, none of the opposition's three articles have proven anything beyond more tales of how these events happened, and even then none of the authors or anyone quoted is sure of how it happened, meaning it is all just baseless conjecture. I will concede to the fact that the Bible has been written by many people over the course of approximately 2000 years, however, this also leads to the point that humans have always had a knack for making up events or twisting the truth to make it sound better, this has not been a trait of the past 100 or so years. As for the opposition challenging me to prove that such a being does not exist, as I stated in my previous response, the Burden of Proof lies with the person making the claim. The opposition is suggesting that there is a being that defies what laws and scientific explanation we all know, then they must prove it otherwise the scientific explanations that have more basis for being true will remain firmly in place as the truth. Which is always the issue when it comes to religious debates, the events of religion have always existed before official records were kept, making it exceedingly difficult to prove that anything of such ever happened. We have had many tragedies in this day and age more severe than what has been depicted in the Bible, yet no miracle has happened to stop such tragedies, the religious will say that God has forsaken us for something we have done, the non-believers will say no such miracles ever happened. I would believe the opposition's story of a girl regrowing muscle in a matter of seconds or minutes if there was some kind of photo or video evidence, however it seems when ever a miracle such as this happens, there is no such evidence available.