Are communist governments better than other forms of government

My opponent challenged me to this debate. I don't see how we can debate in 2 rounds... but here goes...ANALYSIS:PRO AND CON HAVE A SHARED BOP, 1)Con must give an alternative government as well as rejecting Pro's gov.2) Pro must attack Con's gov. and support a Communist government.3) No semantics, plagiarism is an automatic forfeiture with all 7 points going to the other side.4) The comments section may not be used for sources.5) All sources must be cited in the text.6) Extentions are concessions, and can be viewed as automatic Voters.PRO CASE:Observations: 1) Pro's Case will center around the IDEA of a Communist Government, there is no need for implementation. 2) Pro's Case will be labeled under different Premises. Each Premise represents an individual argument that is not connected to the former or latter Premise.Premise 1) A Utopian Society, an Equal Society A Communist State has no social Hierarchy, and no Class-Based Structure. This over time evolves into a truly equal establishment based on the reformation of social order. The idea behind a Communist Government is simple, work in the best interest of the working class, those that work recieve the benefits of such a government, as they put in their own input to better the state. A government's primary obligation is to it's people, and the collective State. There is no wrong done in diminishing barriers, and bringing about equal input from everyone. This in turn generates extended benefit to the country that are reflected upon the working class. Note- The government does not force the disabled, elderly, or adolescents to work. [1]Premise 2) A Communist State with a Mixed Economy China, [2] is currently a Communist State, but rather than having the typically thought of "Command" Economy, in which each and every part of the Economy is Government controlled, the Chinese have a Mixed Economy, in which the Private Sector is still controlled by the citizens. While this crude example may appear faulty, the idea behind the economic behavior of a Communist State can be better represented by China. The overall idea, and the premise presupposed from this, would be that Communism is not just 100% government controlled, and does in fact work with the people's interests. The Chinese classify their Economy as "Market Socialism". China's economy is currently 3rd in the world, and the unemployment rate is one of the lowest of the world powers. [3] Clearly Market Socialism is effective in today's society, but going even further than that, the idea behind it hasn't been implemented to it's fullest extent. In the world today, such implementation would not see perfection (Due to outside factors), but the idea behind it is flawless.Premise 3) Capitalism breeds WarCapitalism is cause of all war. Communism and Capitalism are self proclaimed polar opposites. Everything Communism stands for is seen to be threatened by Capitalism. This is a pre-emptive Premise, but the entire idea stands, Capitalism, the opposite of Communism, breeds war. [4] Throughout History, Capitalists have been trying to achieve Economic growth, at the cost of other's lives. Capitalism breeds war in the name of the Economy, as many Capitalists try to reduce unemployment and debt. According to the Capitalists of the early 1900's, war is completely justified if the Economy benefits from it. This premise in turn justifies World War 1 and especially World War 2. [4] Premise 4) Capitalism breeds AnthroCapitalism breeds Anthropocentrism, which is the idea that human beings are the dominant species, and completely disregards the well-being of any other life forms. [5] The reason for this being, Societal Structure is extremely faulty in a Capitalist society, in which people view each other not as human beings, but as a different being altogether. The rich view the poor much like the poor may view an ant, such radical thoughts only bring worse outlooks upon the world. So why should we care that Capitalism breeds Anthropocentric views? Anthro leads to a faster rate of extinction, [6] not only does disregard for nature hurt human beings due to starvation and disease, but it also effects us morally, in that each and every human being's total disregard for other life breeds more war and justifies slaughter in the name of a dominant species. This in turn leads to extinction, as the world turns inward upon itself, Capitalists waste the resources they possess, and soon when the need rises to it's highest point, the world will die, and life on Earth will be no different from life on Mars.Premise 5) Capitalist Economies Vs Communist EconomiesCapitalist Economies have less business, and far higher unemployment rates. Private Sector investors hurt capitalist economies because they do not create new jobs, and lack the efficiency that a Labor-Run company may have. In a Communist economy, the Private sector is run by the working class, those that work at the company own it, increasing both efficiency due to their extended knowledge of their work, and of course, the employment rates. [7]Premise 6) Karl Marx and Fredrick Engles are GeniusesThe entirerety of the typical Communist Government lies in Marxist-Engles Ideology. These two men are the gods of Communism and Socialism, the two geniuses who invented a revolutionary idea, that unfortunately has not been implemented to it's finest degree. The Communist Manifesto is the bible of a Communist Government, and is treasured as such. An ACTUAL Communist Government would be fully obliged to follow such a holy doctrine, and the one would easily see there are no flaws to a Utopian Society. The world we live in today is far worse than the world that could be if Communism were implemented according to the Communist Manifesto. [8]Sources:[1] http://selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com...[2] http://repository.tamu.edu...[3] https://www.cia.gov...[4] http://www.globalresearch.ca...[5] http://www.merriam-webster.com...[6] ttp://www.crosscurrents.org...;[7] http://www.germane-software.com...[8] http://www.marxists.org...Sorry I rushed this, been very busy recently. From this I urge a Pro vote.