Scientific Evidence Supports Macroevolution

One Species has not been obeserved to evolve into a New/Different species, My opponent pointed out the Fossil record, despite the fact that Similar Design can also explain fossils " Eyewitness testimony, of the sort that my opponent demands, is not the primary method used by scientists. Think about particle physics, chemistry, and biology as examples where the materials which are studied obviously cannot be seen with the naked eye."I never asked for eyewitness testimony I asked for One Species to be Observed to evolve into a New/Different Species, this should be done repeatedly, documented, etc, otherwise evolution, is just an idea. "Additionally, eyewitness testimony is far less reliable than physical evidence (such as the kind which supports evolution, incidentally)"No evolution supports Physical Speculation, such as the speculation of Transitional/Evolution from fossils when it can Easily be explained as a Similar design, meaning that the fossils record is not, nor can ever be evidence for Evolution." A theory of who-done-it can be confirmed in criminal justice with DNA sequencing and identifiers. A theory of who-done-it… with Neanderthals in the ancient past can similarly be confirmed by ] the same kind of tests."Yet it's still not a fact, we can Always speculate who the killer is, but never ever Know for an absolute objective fact, which means evolution is pointless, I can easily observe Intelligent Design in DNA, this is an Objective Fact because I can see it with my own eyes under a microscope, I can't say someone is a killer for an objective fact based on "clues", but either if I saw the murder done with my own eyes or see a video taped footage of it(Still the tape could be forged, who knows), same with evolution, I can't observe it, therefore I don't know if it happened or not unless,1, An objective fact contradicts evolution or2, Evolution is observed and thus an objective factHowever an objective fact Already contradicts it, called DNA, clearly proves Intelligent Design and we can observe it under a microscope, so Evolution not only has no proof, cannot be observed(therefore we'll never know if it happened) but it also is proven false by the objective fact of DNA and therefore Intelligent Design. "YHWH is not verifiable by the naked eye,"1, When dealing with Evolution/Creation it needs to be seen with the naked eye as it invovles the causing of our physical bodies, as Evolution/Creation deal with physical causing of our bodies.2,if it is proven that we are not Visible, that we aren't material, that we are as said in Theism, Immaterial, then YHWH(The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit) is not required to be seen by the naked eye. 3, It is proven that we are Immaterial, proven by Substance Dualism via Quantum Mechanics...(Example:It is observed that the atoms in our hand are distinct and separate from our head/brain(as the body is made up of millions/billions of separate Individual atoms, as separate as your hand is to the wall, they are not the same and are indvivually existing,Meaning if we are our brains then we would be completely incapable of feeling our hands, yet we can feel our hands, so we cannot be any piece of matter, nor can we be multiple pieces of matter, as we are only One Being/Mind.Therefore since we feel both our hands and head at the same thing despite both the head and hand being completely distinct and there being no material connection(all atoms are separate, nothings one piece), and the fact that we are One Being/Person/Mind we Scientifically have to be Non-material and transcend ou bodies.Since non-matter is able to transcend our atomic bodies(evident by the fact that both the hand and head, 2 separate pieces of matter can be felt by the same being/person/mind) it can therefore transecend all Atoms as all matter/atoms are the same, meaning we are sustained in our bodies and are subject to being finite instead of everywhere(so if my hand gets cut off I no longer feel it, I am subject only to my body)What does this mean? since being sustained would be impossible via a mindless cause, the sustaining is conscious, there is a mind sustaining us, that is who we call YHWH(The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit) Back to #3, since we are Immaterial, Creation involves Both observation with naked eye and YHWH is not subject to it, as our bodies are physical, but we(The Being) are scientifically notSubstance Dualism)So YHWH is not subject to being observed via naked eye, can be proven via naked eye(DNA), but not observed, just like consciousness cannot be observed, Evolution however could be observed with naked eye, but isn't, therefore we have no reason to believe it. "With respect to first cause, is Con proposing that YHWH is a disembodied mind floating around in the nothingness of the infinite past "My opponent is putting words in my mouth, I never said this in any round,#1, An infinite regression is a Proven Impossibility, to demonstrate, Count down from Infinity, cannot be done, likewise a Past cannot be infinite, we'd never get to future, remember time is not as said in mainstream, One cannot travel to the past or future,Why?Because the past no longer exists and the future is yet to exist, that is the basic of time, one event to the next, if the past and future existed we would be there, conscious of it, we are not. "before it occurred to him to make all of existence? "Who said He exists in Time? The argument has YHWH create time, He doesn't require time and He doesn't change, He doesn't need time to think/etc to do anything, timelessness doesn't imply muteness, as we have no idea what it is without time, yet we know that time started to exist, and we know Something cannot create nothing.Also First Uncaused Cause, remember these facts, an Accident requires a PRIOR mover/cause, while an event on Purpose requires no prior mover/cause, so The First Uncaused Cause couldn't have caused by accident/unintentionally" as it has no prior cause, therefore caused on purpose, God(YHWH:The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit) Exists " there is absolutely no evidence that disembodied minds exist"My opponent demonstrates 2 fallacies,1, Assumes Lack of Evidence is evidence of Absence, remember I never said, "Evolution lacks evidence, therefore didn't happen" I say, Evolution has never been observed, therefore we don't KNOW if it happened, the reason I say it didn't happen is because Objective contradictions such as DNA have been observed to prove creation.It is fallacious to assume a lack of evidence means evidence of absence.2, Opponent said, " there is absolutely no evidence " This is a fallacy because my opponent doesn't know whether or not Evidence exists for it, as the Entire universe hasn't been observed, so my opponent cannot say "There's absolutely no evidence" that is misleading.Also there is evidence of Disembodied Consciousness, proven with Substance Dualism above."When a river causes erosion in rock over millions of years, are you saying that means that the river must have all the same properties of rock canyons "Another fallacy, the example you gave is not analogous to what I said, the rocks causing erosion is an example of Cause and Effect between two existing things,Not cause and effect as in Cause to Exist, as we are debating about, so that doesn't apply, if There's NOTHING, meaning No Properties, therefore no way this can Cause Something to exist, it is incapable as for a Cause to Cause to something to exist, the Cause must have greater properties than the effect, A Mindless/Conscious cause lacks the property of a Mind/Consciousness, therefore cannot cause a Mind/Consciousness, which is basic science. "Science works. That is why people respect it, as well as the people who practice the discipline."Exactly, yet evolution is not Science, we have never ever seen one species evolved into a new species, we can see Intelligence in DNA.Conclusion, Evolution is not supported by Science as never observed, remains a simple idea.