The God Hypothesis is the best scientific explanation for the origins of existence

The God Hypothesis indeed qualifies as a scientific explanation as well as the best one for several reasons. It is a rationally conceived hypothesis, it does not violate occam's razor, there is enough evidence that would describe the nature of this cause from connecting the data points, and most importantly its falsifiable: FIRST CAUSE ARGUMENT 1. Philosophically, its one thing to concieve of an infinite regress of causes, but its another thing to translate it into reality. For instance, a perfect circle is mathematically possible but actually drawing a perfect circle in general is impossible. This means an infinite set only exist in the mind not in reality, and there cannot be an infinite regress or set of causes. There has to be an uncaused first cause that is limitless by nature. However, this first cause could not be the universe because if there was an infinite number of past events, we would of never of gotten here. For example, if I told someone that before I go to bed to sleep I will flip the light switch for an infinite amount of times, would I be able to go to bed still? the answer is NO. Since Time is part of the universe, then it follows that if time was infinite we would have never of gotten here in the first place. Thus, since the first cause cannot be the universe, it must be some transcendent entity apart from the Universe ,which is the First cause. I will call this first cause the God Hypothesis . 2. Now, its time to connect the data points to the divine attributes of the God Hypothesis (i.e. First cause): METAPHYSICAL A. The Space-Time Theorem of General Relativity clearly states that space, time, and matter and energy all had a concrete beginning. This means whatever caused this must have been a changeless, timeless, and immaterial being that created the universe. It must be timeless and therefore changeless without the universe because it created time. Since it also created space, it must transcend space as well and must therefore be immaterial not physical. Thus, the attribute of this cause would be omni-present, eternal, and immaterial. DISEMBODIED MIND B. There are only two possible candidates that can possibly fit such a description of an immaterial, omnipresent, and eternal entity: either an abstract object (like a number) or a disembodied mind (or consciousness). However, abstract objects do not stand in casual relationships. For instance, the number 9 cannot do anything. Only an unembodied mind would stand in causality since minds are metaphysical and have free will. Otherwise, it would be impossible to explain how you can get a temporal effect with a beginning from an eternal cause. If the cause is there, then the effect would have to be there once the initial conditions of the effect are given. Therefore, it follows logically that the transcended cause of the universe is a personal disembodied mind for it to have the intrinsic desire and then freely choose to act upon that desire to create a universe that allows the existence of intelligent life. ALL-KNOWING C. The fundamental laws and constants of nature came into being immediately after the big bang perfectly calibrated within an infinite set of values, to allow the existence of intelligent life. This is evidence of intelligent design as the possible explanation. Moreover, the Principle of Universality states, that the same general scientific principles are probably true throughout the cosmos.This principle can bring us to the conclusion that by extracting from the unknown amount of intelligence in the natural sciences to the most likely degree of intelligence that is applicable throughout the cosmos. Since the universe is semi-infinite in the future, there's potentially an infinite number of mathematical relations out there to be discovered. Each of these relations by definition represents a small amount of cosmic intelligence waiting to be understood, so it follows that the universe must necessarily possess an infinite degree of mathematical intelligence. This not only suggest that the cause is intelligent but the degree of intelligence and knowledge would be infinite. Thus, the attribute of this cause must have omniscience. ALL-POWERFUL D. Our universe was created out of nothing perfectly fine-tuned to support life from the very beginning. This is the definition of a miracle which is something that defies the laws of physics. Thus, the attribute of this cause must be omni-potent. ADDITIONAL SUPPORTING EVIDENCE E. Since this creator had to have been eternal and intelligent for creating an inconceivably complex universe, we have reason to believe that its the same source that created life and complex life forms as well. Life could not and did not exist around the time the singularity expanded and "life comes from life" , according to existing data. In addition, all our empirical oberservations showing only intelligent life creating other intelligent life. There is empirical evidence showing simple life forms becoming or creating complex life forms. Thus, there had to have been an eternal life force that exist outside of space and time who freely chose to infuse life and intelligently design life forms from simple to complex on Earth. OCCAM'S RAZOR 3. The God Hypothesis does not violate Occam's Razor, which is the simplest explanation should always be favored over the complex ones or needlessly multiplying causes is unnecessary. The reason why the God Hypothesis is the simplest explanation is because its a rational hypothesis that is also supported by many points of data as I demonstrated earlier. It postulates only one cause and its falsifiable, which leads me to my last segment here. FALSIFICATION 4. If my opponent could demonstrate how the cause of the universe could still be natural or could not be a cause at all, then it would completely negate and falsify the God hypothesis entirely. He can either do this or do it the hard way and falsify each of my claims I made about the universe.