know=physical experience of now

Again Pro has not responded to my 4 main arguments, by this point that concession should win me the debate.I think Pro needs to do a lot of work to clarify how he is using the words in his argument.I will do a line-by-line response to Pro's argument, quoted text will be in bold: I have no idea what you are saying.. matter is true is it not? your eyes are matter, physical experience is trueTruth describes a proposition or some claim. Claims like "matter exists" can be true, "matter" itself cannot. The statement "matter is true" is unintelligible. Matter cannot be true or false- it can exist and we can make claims about matter that are true or false, but it cannot have the property of "true."The fact that my eyes are matter does not yield the conclusion that physical experience is true or yields true beliefs. My eyes decieve me all the time, the eyes of someone on LSD yield wildly untrue information.without my sense im dead, there can be no realityBraindead people can be alive, sleeping people are alive, unconscious people are alive. You conclusion does not follow from your premise. Reality exists even if I am dead.a blind man can not see reality, as he is blindA blind man can't see anything, but he is a part of the same reality as everyone else. Thus his reality contains colors.knowledge is truth, not true, truth can only be in the past, and only now is trueYou will need to clarify this, I don't understand what you are trying to say.why does 1+1 equal 2? if I have a pen in my hand, and I put another pen in my hand, I have 2 pens in my hand is true, is what I know, if I imagine 1 more then its 1+1=3 is false, as the answer is imaginaryThis is an exmaple of how mathematics may be applied to reality, but there are many many example of mathematics going beyond what is physically observable. Example:math is true or false, not about the past.I agree math statements can be true or fase and math does not concern the past. This is irrelevant to the resolution. Math can be true and is not a physical experience of now, so the Resolution is negated.knowledge is memory, memory is from experience and experience is nowThis is the fallacy of quivocation- all experience occurs "now" as it is happening, but that experience ceases to be of "now" once it is over. To say my memory of my fifth birthday is experience of "now" is absurd. Memory is experience of the past, not of now.If you are arguin that the phenomena of physical experience can only happen now, fine. Then knowledge is (partly) constituted by memory, but memory is not the same as physical experience, it is FROM experience. Memory is not a physical experience of now, it is recollection of past experience (and some of that experience is likely non-physical)the future and past is information, and my imagination only happens now0 and 1 is defined by nothing and something, information and matterPlease elaborate, I am not following your argument.physical experience only happens now This is incorrect, almost all of my physical experience happened in the past. The act of experiencing may only happen now, but the experience itself can happen in the past. When would you say my experience of my fifth birthday happened?