The user "ark428" is a horrible troll

Thank you for taking this debate.For once, ark428 actually argues something. Haven't seen this before.I'll begin with refuting every thing he has said.RefutationsCon's First Point: "I am clearly not a mythical beast..."As I strictly defined in the first round, I am not referring to a mythical being, but an Internet troll, "someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages." [1]Con even recognizes this later on, so I don't see the relevance in bringing this up in the first place.Con's Second Point: Con claims to be intelligentI don't even understand why intelligence is in this debate. Regardless of whether or not the Opposition is intelligent or not, neither brain power nor IQ determine if someone is a troll. Disregard any mention of "intelligence."Con's Third Point: XStrikeX is a troll because he posts inflammatory commentsFirstly, I'm no troll. I take debates seriously. And just because I merely insulted you does not make me a troll. There's no proof that a single insult transforms someone into an Internet troll. Secondly, even if I was a troll, that would not be relevant to this debate. I'm arguing that you are a HORRIBLE troll, and you must defend yourself, not simply claim I am a troll. That wouldn't be debating the resolution. It's irrelevant and disproven.AssertionsI am arguing that ark428 is not only just a troll, but a horrible, terrible one.Firstly, I will prove that he is trying to troll, then I will prove that he's bad at it.1. User "ark428" is trying to trollThe Opposition has challenged user "Topiarey" to two topics, entitled "'Merica" and "'Merica Round 2."Let's take a look at the first debate, 'Merica. [2]In this, it would seem to be ark428's intention to frustrate Topiarey. He created a one round debate, posting no arguments and merely concluding with, "I will wait for my opponent to present his points," as if he believes he's being funny.Let's examine 'Merica Round 2. [3]Here ark428 begins to argue. His first contention is that "'Mericuh is awesome." He goes on to say that other countries are "run by little girls," and that America has the best food ("cheeseburgers"). ANY DEBATER, even a bad one, recognizes that these arguments are terrible, especially due to their lack of reasoning or evidence. ark428, therefore, must be trying to troll.The Opposition has also attempted to troll user "Arch." Let's analyze the debate "People are stupid." [4]ark428's first and only contention: ". I wait for my opponent to say something." Not only does he waste Arch's time, but he's not even funny. He's a terrible troll.Unfortunately, his next debate, "'Merica with another person" has been removed by Customer Support. Probably because it was also meaningless.His final debate with "Arch" is called "My opponent will lose this debate." [5]Burden of proof was not met. He was clearly trolling.ConclusionThe Opposition, for the most part, is not actually debating on this website. He's trolling, trying to waste people's time, and he's not even good at it. He's not funny and his trolling is lame. He tries to upset people, but he's terrible at it; therefore, ark428 is a terrible troll. Sources:1. http://en.wikipedia.org...2. 'Merica - http://debate.org...3. 'Merica Round 2 - http://debate.org...;4. People are stupid - http://debate.org...;5. My opponent will lose this debate - http://debate.org...;