JESUS OF THE BIBLE, A PRINCE OF PEACE . (In memory of Akbar Sidi)

I will now move on to present my third round of argument which is going to be about making rebuttals to the Pros points. The Pro wrote; "Merriam Webster gives us this definition: Full Definition of peace 1: a state of tranquillity or quiet: a a: freedom from civil disturbance b: a state of security or order within a community provided for by law or custom " I think the pro exempted other definition of peace listed under full definition of peace by the Merriam Webster's dictionary just because he wants to cherry-pick the definitions that suit his arguments. This is what is written in Merriam Webster; Full Definition of peace 1 : a state of tranquillity or quiet: as a : freedom from civil disturbance b : a state of security or order within a community provided for by law or custom 2 : freedom from disquieting or oppressive thoughts or emotions 3 : harmony in personal relations 4 a : a state or period of mutual concord between governments b : a pact or agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity 5 "used interjectionally to ask for silence or calm or as a greeting or farewell at peace : in a state of concord or tranquillity For confirmation http://www.merriam-webster.com... In the second chapter of the gospel of John, verse 15 says; "Jesus made a whip from some ropes and chased them all out of the Temple. He drove out the sheep and cattle, scattered the money changers' coins over the floor, and turned over their tables(NLT). This action alone contradicts all definitions of peace given by the pro. The pro also wrote; "More evidence that Jesus did not come to slay everyone with his awesome flaming sword of holy and infinite power, is in Matthew 26:51: "With that, one of Jesus' companions reached for his sword, drew it out and struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his ear." Jesus then performs yet another miracle, and places the ear right back on the soilder's head. (Matthew 26:52) "Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him, "for all who draw the sword will die by the sword." That last statement by Jesus can be confusing. If you draw your sword, you will die by it? Here, Jesus is just restating the Golden Rule in a different way. Treat others as you would have them treat you." The pro seems to be concealing so many things, picking up verses that suit him. That Jesus said anyone who draws the sword will die by the sword is understandable. The Roman soldiers were powerful and vicious. Not only did the disciples of Jesus are short of sword compared to the Roman soldiers, they also lack in Might. Jesus couldn't have ordered the disciples to start fighting the terrific Roman soldiers hence he made that statement to save his disciples (if that actually happened). One may ask, What was the disciple doing with a sword? Was Jesus not aware of the disciple's possession of sword? We need not to go far looking for answers. The disciple was in possession of a sword due to the command of Jesus. Jesus said to his disciples in Luke 22:36; "Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." http://biblehub.com... We may ask, "sword for what?". The pro wrote again, "As the unshaken bird is to peace, this bird also represents Jesus. He came to this earth in human flesh, and lived a perfect life for the glory of The LORD. Jesus came in a time that was not peaceful whatsoever, when the greatest world power ever to exist, the Roman Empire, was in control. Jesus went against the norm, and pursued being a servant, a messenger, and a messiah." If this were to be the case, then we could refer to Elijah as being the Prince of peace too as he went against the king, Ahab and played role of God's servant, messenger. In fact, we would say any rebel or activist standing against a tyrannical government is a prince of peace. However, Jesus seems not to be against the Roman rule as the pro claimed rather he was more concerned with the Scribes, Pharisees and the Saducces. Contrary to the pro's argument, we read in Mark 12:17, "Then Jesus said to them, "Give back to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's." And they were amazed at him." I don't know under what holy spirit is the pro giving being against a certain norm as peace. I would like to know if the Pro believes Jesus is God.