BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The malicious and misleading advertisements of today

i am completing my ideas on final round in a sequenced manner 1.There is a reason why advertisement is so common these days. The reason is that advertisement plays a vital role in general commerce. Though we may not think about it so much, ads are just as important for the consumer as it is for the supplier. For starters ads prove that a certain company or business is interested in pleasing the customer. Advertisements are also a good source of information for a potential buyer who may not know much about the company or the products it offers. It also let's people know about a resource or service they might eventually need. Ads also inform the customer about any new improvements to a product. I also believe that advertisement is the greatest tool and source of of expression a company can posses. Through advertisement a manufacturer can directly provide a customer with useful information eliminating the need for a middle man and allowing the customer to decide for themselves on what they want. 2.Advertisement has also been a huge part of our country's tradition and culture. Advertisement as a whole has opened many people's minds to new world views.We must also understand that ads only promote sales and business which is an essential part of any free trade government. Many public notices are used for moral and patriotic purposes as well. 3. Needless to say our system of publicity and advertisement help benefit our economy in every way possible.In a capitalist system of government the economy lives off private and individual trade and advertisement promotes this. Advertisement is also a factor that is vital in the growth of any business big or small, if America's businesses grow so will it's finances. Also in this difficult recession one of the most important factors of recovery is employment, so think about it this way: * Advertisement and Publicity= Prosperous Businesses= Increase in Job Openings= Financial Recovery*
The malicious and misleading advertisements of today

I agree that modern commerce trade and industry cannot survive without advertisement. The most advanced advertising technology course gives new ideas and also acts as "Survival of fittest" in this dynamic decade. However there should be control over misleading advertisements. I believe that Advertisements should not mislead in any way by inaccuracy, ambiguity, exaggeration, omission or otherwise. More specifically, advertisements should not: 1-Misrepresent any matter likely to influence consumers" attitude to any product, advertiser, or promoter; 2-Misrepresent any information to mislead consumers into believing any matter that is not true, such as the source of the product, quality of the product, obligation (or non-obligation) in using a trial product, and others; 3-Mislead consumers about the price of goods or services; 4-Underestimate the actual total price to be paid; 5-Mislead consumers to overestimate the value or mislead consumers regarding the conditions on the terms of payment such as hire purchase, leasing, installment sales and credit sales; or 6-Mislead consumers regarding the terms or guarantee, delivery, exchange, return, repair and maintenance; and mislead consumers regarding the extent of benefits for charitable causes. If a presentation (such as a speech, documentary and newsreel) is substantially an advertisement, it should be clearly stated as an advertisement. 1-Advertisements should not misuse research results or quotations from technical and scientific publications. 2-Statistics should not be so presented so as to imply a greater validity that they really have. 3-Scientific terms should not be misused; scientific jargon and irrelevancies should not be used to make claims appear to have any scientific basis which they do not possess. I would like to emphasize the important status of advertising in our society. Advertising helps us to orient among the wide range of products. On the other hand they use unethical practices, such as telemarketing companies who call random people and try to sell their products by using any methods. Nowadays people have to be extremely prudent when they sign anything and read everything carefully. Advertisement is everywhere.
The malicious and misleading advertisements of today

cost of the advertisement is not the primary concern for a company if it is compared with total expenditure on product if advertisement cost is taken as a whole then per unit cost will slightly increase so it's better and beneficial to aware the whole populace by awaring them ......a product's advertisement does not only decides the selling of products it only awares the people......if you are saying that effect on young minds then it is totally wrong and most of the big brands do advertisement if the product is of really quality ...just like for sachine advertises for boost and amitabh chyavanprash....regarding your third point it is not always that we can have available the fresh foods and vegetables so it's the only way....and most of the farthest areas is availed by it ...but the adverse effect of dry is not popularly known to me...regarding alchohals cigerette it gives a large revenue to our government so thats why it is not stopping ......misconceptions about products and transparency regarding product will not remains in a black box it'll come out with a speedy respond by contumer .it'll not decieve people at all ..if there will be any disastrous problem then one product is launched by permission of government then there will be an action.........
The malicious and misleading advertisements of today

I agree to my opponent that it creates awareness among the consumers regarding the particular product but one can't deny the fact that they are far much misleading Here are the points on which I rely - 1-Cost of advertisement affects the cost of product. It will become burden to costumer. 2-The promoters only emphasise on the merits. 3-Advertisers present the product as a favourite of the celebrities. This has great influence on young minds. 4-People are preferring ready made food than fruits and vegetables through advertising. These new habits are adversely impacting their health. 5-Some pesticides, though in very small quantities were found in common cold drinks. But advertisers are not revealing this fact. 6-All cosmetic products are advertised in the name of fruit extracts, the chemical contents are neither displayed nor printed on the product cover. 7-Teenagers are attracted by cigarette, alcohol and diet pills advertisements, and their health is adversely effecting by these habits. 8-Consumers tend to be manipulated by an advertisement's promise that the product will do something special for them, which upsets their budget. 9-An advertisement for an expensive good is likely to create an ill-feeling in the mind of a poor teenager who cannot afford it. Such feelings often lead to hatred and anti-social activities. I would remind the opponent that he should post his argument and then in the final round we will put up ways and conclusions on this topic
The malicious and misleading advertisements of today

first of all i want to say that on what basis you say that are that advertisements of today are malicious .its totally wrong because in present scenerio there is a high competition between the companies to sell their products in the market and advertisement gives the chance to show the quality of products of companies and it should be .if philips is a good electronic company then oreva and havells also may be .......the price of bulb is 20% lower than philips and gives same quality ty.if it will not be done then dominating companies will play game of capitalism what they want.......through the advertisement most of the people become curious to know about the product and try to learn information this shows transparency in market and incourages the market environment .....again it improves the quality of product due to everyone wants to fill the desire of costumer.........
The malicious and misleading advertisements of today

Advertising at times misleads the public. This may be deliberate or unintentional. There are organisations for helping consumers. For example, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) and of its supportive organisation, the Consumer Complaints Council (CCC).Complaints pour into the office of CCC regarding advertising in the press as well as TV. However, it is not always easy for the CCC to make its ruling. Take for example, the country-wide advertisement launched by the National Egg Coordination Committee (NECC).The advertisement said, among other things, that just two eggs give you more protein than 309 ml of milk (two glasses), 6.6 kg of apples or 14 kg of tomatoes. "Eat them (the eggs) for breakfast. Eat them for lunch, dinner, and snack time. Anytime at all Eggs are good for everyone. So crack some eggs every day," the copy said. And it added: "You can"t buy healthier food for the price of eggs."Many consumers objected to this advertisement as being misleading. For example, the advertisement implies that it is better to eat two eggs than has milk or apples. Milk is taken not only for its protein content but for other reasons.Therefore, to suggest that one should give up milk is patently unethical. Besides, the advertisement says: "Vitalise your blood" by eating eggs. How is blood vitalised? Again, this is considered misleading. Still later the advertisement says: "Eggs are good for everyone."Any cardiologist will clarify that a heart patient must shun eggs like the devil as they have too much cholesterol. Therefore, eggs are not good for everyone and to say so is wrong. Again, what about the vegetarian? Is the National Egg Coordination Com"mittee trying to make a non-vegetarian out of him by spending public sector money?Take the case of Philips, a reputed multinational-affiliated company which has been advertising its bulbs on a fairly wide scale. The full page advertisement shows a half bulb (sawn half) and the copy above it says: "Why buy half a bulb?" Side by side is shown a full bulb with the legend: "Buy Philips and be sure," written above it.The body copy of the advertisement says: "To start with, all bulbs look alike. But in time, bad quality shows That"s why insist on Philips" The impression projected is that only Philips makes good bulbs while all the other manufacturers make bulbs of poor quality " in other words, half bulbs.According to Philips, the campaign was meant "to be a reminder to the many Philips buyers that the Philips bulb is a quality product and gives full value for his money." However, that is not how the message is interpreted by many.The above examples indicate that even well-known organisations, who should know better, indulge in misleading advertising and thus" spoil the image of advertising in general. Again, it is better for advertisers to observe the "Code for Commercial Advertising
Guys are more racist and less social than girls.

Hello Kizamag, Sorry I forfeited my argument . You say that girls are social ,so why are their are girls which are outcasts? Also you say that girls accept better things then men so why do they do such a big dramas from small things. You say that men influence more other people and that is ,because for a long time only men could been viewed as leaders . So men did the bad things like the Holocaust ( Hitler) and the good things like Gandhi which gave independence to India by peace which saved many lives , not a war like America . So you can't say that men are more racist than girls ,because some of them did bad things and girls at that time didn't have power in politics (that has changed today,now women and men have the same rights). You say that girl don't manifest racism , so why some women were part of the Nazi ,KKK , fascism and even some worked in Auschwitz as SS . And today some are part of racist political parties.
Guys are more racist and less social than girls.

It's understandable that all of them often and always interrupt. But a fact that girl aren't easy to understand is not true. Of course from research we can listen that girl don't always say things strait and clear is very well acceptable. But we are not talking about the way of explaining or understanding something, but we are talking about the way of ACCEPTING something. And your example doesn't really match that all girls don't explain what they think. Even that, I'm talking about the way which THEY ACCEPT things. My argument is that Girls are more social and less racist than guys. If we look back to the history. So, we will turn back to the German of to the Us, the most people to influenced others were man. Hitler for example, but Girls or Wife don't care about those things. In fact girls are more open that guys. And I'm rephrasing it by saying: Girl accept things even if they don't want, like you said also it before. That's why they don't manifest any racism action to ot
Guys are more racist and less social than girls.

Hello Kizamag , First of all girls talk more then boys and they often interrupt . Secondly girls aren't easy to understand they don't say things strait and clear . (example : a boy will say I didn't like it , but a girl will say it was ok , but it was uninteresting ) Your argument is like that (Guys stay in a group and talk to each other = guys are therefore racist = girls are better than guys ) So if a guy is in anti-racist group and talks with his friends about that issue , he will be racist , because he is in a group . Your argument is not right. You say that white guys will accept someone if they know him very well , therefore girls will accept somebody that they don't know very well . But in reality is totally different I see more often guys talking to a stranger and girls forming their little groups of 5 friends and doing everything together . I think you are making a stereotype of white guys . Good luck with the argument
Guys are more racist and less social than girls.

As you can see, Girl are easier and simple to understand. They don't talk too much but they try to listen to what some one says. They are also more social to make friends from all kind. They don't really more care about what kind of person it is. But guys are something else. They always stay in groups and talk about something. Like an other guy. In that way, Guys always be racist than girls. You can see that even in all happening in our cities how many problematic people and troubled are guys. That's the first thing to prove that girl are better and understand than guys. In Europe are things just the same. Black guys always make friends with white girls more easier than how they could do it with other white guys. But these white guys accept someone until when they know him very well. For example if they sport together or make music together. These things are true and understandable.
We are not saved by faith alone

Oh.. We are talking about Dead faith?I assumed we were talking about Living faith because the argument was simply stated as "faith".ridiculousness. The scriptures are stating that you if you have faith, works will come. But faith is the part that saves because works without faith will not save you. “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.” -Ephesians 2:8,9 (all quotations will be taken from the KJV)WORKS are the result of FAITH. It is the faith that saves and only the faith that saves. Works come because of your faith. God gives grace when you have faith. Faith produces works. Faith is the tree and works are it's fruits. "For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so faith apart from works is dead."According to scriptures, if a tree does not produce fruit, you can determine it is dead.Look at it this way, "For as the tree apart from the fruits is dead, so faith apart from works is dead"Faith is not the result of works. Only Faith can save. The bible teaches that we are saved by faith alone, so that nobody can boast. Jesus is the reason for your salvation. Don't think that anything you've done makes you worthy of heaven. The bible teaches that we are saved by faith alone.
We are not saved by faith alone

This presupposes the existence of God, and the accuracy of the bible. And I would like to debate this with a Protestant or non-denominational Christian. I want to start my argument by pointing out that if we are saved by faith alone, then we don't need to love anyone, but Jesus tell us in the bible to love others. And 1 Corinthians chapter 13 verse 13 says that love is greater than faith. If we were saved by faith alone than it would logically follow that Faith would be the greatest of all the Cardinal virtues, but the bible says that love is greater. And if faith alone is the most important thing than why does that phrase appear just once in scripture? and where it does say it it says that we are not saved by faith alone: James chapter 2 verse 24 If we were saved by faith alone than it would logically follow that faith would be God's soul criteria for judging us, but every passage in the New Testament that talks of us being judged, says that we will be judged by our works, our deeds, by what we have done. Such as Matthew 24, John 15, Romans 2, and Revelations 20. What is the difference between the redeemed and unsaved and the redeemed and saved? Is it something Jesus did? If it is something Jesus did then why didn't he do it for everyone? The bible says that he desires all men to be saved in 1 timothy chapter 2 verse 4. Is it something we did? If it is something we did, then isn't that a work? The bible says that we have to forgive others in order to have our sins forgiven by God, in Matthew chapter 2 verse 14. Forgiving is a work. Which means we are not saved by faith alone, but by faith and works.
We are not saved by faith alone

“I am not saying the apostles didn't do good works. They did. I am saying that just having faith does not guarantee that we will do works.” James 2:18 “But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.” What you have said about this is correct. This scripture that we have already used proves this. “Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.” Faith can and should be manifested as works. Works show faith. Notice that he didn’t say, and I will show you my faith with my works. He makes clear his point that faith should bring works. “Where does it say that He will say ANYTHING LIKE THAT?” Why do you keep bringing this up??? It really doesn't even have to do with the point of the debate! Your obviously just being extremely close minded. I was just trying to exaggerate the fact that on judgment day you will stand trial and your sins will be overlooked because of what Jesus did. It was a minuscule point. I’m sorry, I assumed you would understand that my statement wasn’t supposed to be taken literally. I was just trying to prove a point. “I have brought up plenty of verses that do.” None that I couldn’t counter with reason. 　 　 “ again you didn't answer my question. Where does it say that Jesus was trying to show His disciples the greed of the rich man?” This is much to theologically advanced for you. You would need this fed to like a baby being fed milk. I apologize that I can only provide the meat of this scripture. These are some sources that may help you find the truth. http://www.heavensfamily.org... http://bible.org... http://www.truthaccordingtoscripture.com... “Yes he sins anyway, which shows that just having faith will not make us do good works. Sinning is the opposite of good works. Not Peter, Paul. No, the body is not corrupt. The body is good and sacred.” Nobody ever said that if you have faith you will stop sinning and only do good works. I simply said that true faith will cause good works. Man doesn’t become perfect automatically because of faith. Man is still capable of doing wrong. Faith just increases the likeliness that man will do good. 　 　 　 “The evidence that it is talking about the VIRTUE of love, is that it says faith, hope, and love, which are the Cardinal VIRTUES. If it was talking about God as love, then it would not say faith and hope as well.” Just because YOU say they are the cardinal VIRTUES means absolutely nothing. The scripture we are referring to doesn’t have the word VIRTUE anywhere in it! Look and see! 1 Corinthians 13:13 “And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.” Your argument has no foundation whatsoever. My argument stays the same from before. This verse says love is the greatest because love is God. God created everything and knows everything. So obviously he would be the greatest according to scripture.
We are not saved by faith alone

I am not saying the the apostles didn't do good works. They did. I am saying that just having faith does not guarantee that we will do works. Where does it say that He will say ANYTHING LIKE THAT? I have brought up plenty of verses that do. No you have not given evidence you have simply said that is what you think. again you didn't answer my question. Where does it say that jesus was trying to show His disciples the greed of the rich man? Yes he sins anyway, which shows that just having faith will not make us do good works. Sinning is the opposite of good works. Not Peter, Paul. No, the body is not corrupt. The body is good and sacred. Yes, it clearly does point to any internal conflict. And it shows that just having faith does not automatically make us do good works as well. The evidence that it is talking about the VIRTUE of love, is that it says faith, hope, and love, which are the Cardinal VIRTUES. If it was talking about God as love, then it would not say faith and hope as well.