That the US government is responsible for 9/11

May, 2001. According to a 2002 Sydney Morning Herald report (. http://www.smh.com.au...), the United States defense force draws up battle plans for an invasion of Afghanistan at this time, to commence on September 11.26 June, 2001. Four months before the world trade center attack, the Indian government announces it will support America's "planned" military invasion of Afghanistan. . http://www.indiareacts.com...Mid-July, 2001. Three months before the world trade center attack, the Pakistani foreign secretary is told by "senior American officials" that America was planning to attack Afghanistan in mid-October. . http://news.bbc.co.uk...September 9, 2001. Two days before the world trade center attack, detailed plans for the US invasion of Afghanistan are already spotted on the desk of the US president. . http://www.msnbc.msn.com...The US had detailed plans for an invasion of Afghanistan well before 9/11. 9/11 was therefore not the impetus for the attack - unless, of course, the United States knew about the terrorist attacks in advance. On September 14, 2001, then-president George W. Bush Jr. signed into law the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists. The justification for this act? Let me quote - "on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed against the United States and its citizens" (. http://en.wikipedia.org...)Let me recap- the US government planned to launch an invasion before June 2001. The reason for this was an attack carried out in September 2001. Therefore, the United States government knew about the attacks, and planned for them to happen, to allow the war in Afghanistan to take place. Therefore, they are responsible. It gets worse. In the years following the attack, the United States and other governments have conducted widespread campaigns of misinformation and terrorism to cover their deceit at 9/11 (. http://physics911.net...). If there was nothing to hide, what is the purpose of this? It gets even worse. Three buildings fell during 9/11 (WTC towers) and one partially collapsed (Pentagon). According to the official story, the hijackers were highly faithful to Allah, so Allah graciously lowered the melting point of the steel in the buildings (. http://911review.com...) AND threw some thermites into the dust - so many, in fact, that some were even active long after the tower fell - see . http://www.benthamscience.com.... Even the fact that the towers fell all at once - technically impossible with fire - must be Allah's gift (. http://www.journalof911studies.com...). Allah also increased the impact damage on neighboring buildings (. http://www.journalof911studies.com...) and, just to balance things out, made the buildings collapse on themselves (see any video of the collapses). He even shook the Earth to confuse us (. http://www.journalof911studies.com...).Meanwhile the inspired journalists at every single station, as well as a few "eyewitnesses," invented the crystal ball and described the collapse of WTC7 hours before it happened (. http://www.wtc7.net...).Perhaps it's a little generous to say that there is an official story, though. In the case of WTC7, NIST has come up with dozens of explanations over the years. All have been debunked. Eventually, in 2008, they essentially gave up trying to explain it (. http://911review.com...). You need a serious amount of godly miracles in order to make the chemical findings of the remains of the WTC consistent with any official accounts. But if Allah really hated America that much, surely he'd just send down a few fireballs. Fireballs are much, much more awesome than jets. A much more plausible explanation would be that there was no miracle. Two aircraft crashed into the WTC, but the buildings that fell were demolished. Police (. http://www.prisonplanet.com...) and firefighters (. http://whatreallyhappened.com...) tell us they saw and heard bombs and other suspicious devices around the WTC. Suddenly all the inconsistencies disappear. Now, is it more plausible that these explosives were planted by the government or the terrorists? Surely if the terrorists had these explosives planted there would be no need for the suicides. Perhaps that's why the American government has obstructed, intimidated, and destroyed evidence for every single investigation into the WTC collapses that has ever happened (. http://911review.com...).But you can't demolish the world trade center and use it as a pretext for a war if there was no hijacking. Not only did the US government destroy the WTC themselves, but they also allowed hijacking to take place. After all, they gave flight 11 a 30-minute head start towards New York and didn't respond at all to flight 175 - and even with flight 11, they seemed to make a point of flying very, very slowly (. http://www.historycommons.org...). That's despite the fact that the fighters had just been training for this exact thing - . http://www.usatoday.com.... The United States government had one more thing to do. Blame the attack on Afghanistan. However, Allah had covered all the hijackers tracks so that the CIA couldn't find any evidence linking any of them to the plot, and even resurrected a few of them - showing his supreme mercy towards the hijacker's previous antics of forgetting to take their holy books on to the planes (. http://911review.com...). Of course, the alternative hypothesis is that Allah is not that great after all - there simply were no terrorists. After all, both flights made no distress call (see timeline sourced earlier). Both sets of pilots had failed flight school (. http://foxnews.com...). Even allowing the hijackers into the country was technically illegal (. http://www.wanttoknow.info...). That is not to mention the claim in several media sources - including Newsweek, the Washington Post, and the New York Times (article at . http://www.wanttoknow.info...) that the hijackers trained with the US Military. Did I mention that Atta used his frequent flier number as he boarded the jet? (see . http://www.wanttoknow.info...) It seems highly improbable that this guy was going on a suicide mission. Take it from Leonid Ivashov, formerly commander of Russia's defense forces: "'Al Qaeda' cannot be the organizers nor the performers of the September 11 attacks. They do not have the necessary organization, resources or leaders. " (. http://physics911.net...) Al Qaeda are a small group of rebel fighters. This was a dangerously well-coordinated attack. Not even Jesus performed as many miracles in one day as this group did, according to the official story. In the months before 9/11, Osama Bin Laden was visited by the CIA while getting his kidney treated, according to the French secret service (. http://www.guardian.co.uk...). Why? Is it merely a coincidence that George Bush was hanging with Osama Bin Laden's brother a day before the attacks (. http://www.wanttoknow.info...)? The official account has no explanation for these things. In the next round, I will take a closer look at what happened to the non-world-trade center flights, and offer a little rebuttal. Until then, good luck!