the Clintons are the most corrupt politicians ever in the history of the US government

First, I do commend and thank you for this debate and hope that we have many more in the future. Second, the media is not Clinton run, that is just an absurd assertion that should never be taken into account because most of the media is more conservative oriented and that holds a lot of political clout for the Republican Party. Next, I have refuted the arguments that have been brought up about the Clintons, and all of the arguments presented by the pro can easily be grouped into this one, dropped, argument. The Clinton's were never proven guilty on the accounts that Solarman has said they were. And, you said, "He (Burr) was killed in a duel with Hamilton over Hamilton trashing his family honor- hardly corrupt, and again OBSCURE" – Uh, hello! Your own source says that Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel and Burr killed him. Then he fled to the frontier, escaped further scrutiny from Americans, and went to England. Before all of this, he betrayed his country, almost lost the Revolutionary War for the Americans, and he still killed a man who refused to shoot him in a duel. Yes, Hamilton did not fire upon Burr and Burr knew this and maliciously killed Hamilton. Burr is still THE most corrupt political figure of the United States. Also, yes I am going that far back because the topic leaves the past open. Next, you answered none of by Bush arguments which is paramount because if I can win a risk that Bush has set a precedent in Iraq that has killed more people than the allegations against the Clinton's, then I have won this debate. You asked rhetorical questions without making any statements and FYI, I have family in Iraq telling me that there is A LOT of unneeded killing in Iraq because Bush is so bull-headed on the issue. The terrorists aren't, and probably never were in Iraq. They are in Mexico (yes, Mexico), Iran, North African nations, and some have found safe haven in other Middle Eastern countries. The war in Iraq is nothing but a show of idiocy! No, I am not saying Bush did all of that, he doesn't have the capacity to do that, but the Republican Party sure could have, and did. There is irrefutable evidence out their stating as much. National polls show that no one in America or Iraq wants the US IN Iraq. I can count on one hand the amount of people who think Iraq is a good thing. And, you question my credibility and think me to be naï¿½ve. I don't think spending 4-6 hours a day researching a plethora of sources for debate and for forensics on sites from anarchists to conservative, to the craziest liberals in the world! No, there are no qualifications in that! And, all I have to win is a risk that there has been one, just one political figure who was more corrupt than the Clintons. The Clintons are not as bad as you state they are because Bill is still a highly renowned figure in the global community, he believes in giving aid to people who need it, and was never convicted of killing anyone. You have nothing left in this round except your dignity. Finally, I would rather have heart and fight for something I believe in than have a manufactured brain and be a robot. -Matt