ISIS/Daesh are Islamic and are doing the right thing according to the teachings of Islam

The following segment is a rebuttal segment for the various crap you have spewed, apologist: "Where history is recorded" - yes because being able to write in perfect detail the madness of the voices in his head when muhammad was unable to write is "fact", and so is his ascent to heaven on a winged unicorn. Stellar examples of historical revision and analysis, great stuff!! You say that we cannot compare what they did back then to what we do now because that's "wrong" somehow. No, we can, and we will. To hold him as a role model in spite of the various war crimes and atrocities he and his ilk have committed is classic apologist "contextualisation". muhammad is a child rapist, a war monger, and a war criminal, and deserves nothing but disdain and disgust. The fact that you and your ilk venerate him so is a red flag in every respect of the word. "All of Muhammad's wives were widows". Oh that makes everything okay, what a great guy he was. Marrying women who lost their husbands to his own soldiers, that seems like such a stellar and virtuous thing to do, for a misogynistic madman. "From her value" - yes because being raped and tortured somehow devalues you, what a prime example of Islam's inherent misogyny, how they like to address women=en as if they were stock, and if something were to befall them they are deemed "damaged goods", where their "value" is degraded. Pathetic stone age way of thinking, fitting for a backward faith like Islam. And you even admit that as an atheist my future is one of torment and hellfire. Funny how your profile says you're against torture, and yet this apparent apathy toward my eternal damnation is something you'll respond to only with this: "Should've believed in allah". Absolutely pathetic. To think in the 21st century that people like you are uncaring to peoples damnation and still profess to be nothing like ISIS. That is where you and ISIS are quite similar, you see. They wish hellfire upon me, and you do not care. The dichotomy between the moderate and the radical is show like this: The radical will behead you, but the moderate will hold down your feet. You really aren't all that different, and thinking you are is willful ignorance, then again you need that trait to believe in the garbage proposed in the Quran. And I am in no way able to judge Islam because of my subjective morals due to my atheism. Because my values change with the course of time. Now see there is the problem: Muslims do not want change. Not to their faith system. Even though it is the source of all terrorist acts in the last 20 years, and has overshadowed any other in recent history. I guess my "subjectivity" is but my deficiency, like the inherent deficiency in women, is that not what your quran would have said, or indeed, says? The problem is that moderate muslims and radical muslims, not that there's much difference really, is that one actually has the zeal to pick up a weapon. The other, the moderate, does not care much for those things, but feels free to chastise and slander his opponents by saying that they are unable to judge Islam. Let me guess, you are? As a muslim you are able to judge Islam? Oh but wait you cannot do that because that is a no-no. So who can judge Islam? No one? Thought so. Case and point. And the plagiarism? Not really, merely providing quotes from your book of lies with accurate understandings, devoid of muslim bias, with explanations given by people far more intelligent than I. If anyone/anything is guilty of plagiarism, it is my opponent and the quran. making the same apologist defences and arguments as so many others have before him, and the quran being laughably similar to the Bible, and the Torah before it. You know, people joke about those three books being so laughably plagiarized from one another that if you submitted them to an academic marking board, you'd fail the course due to, you guessed it, plagiarism.