There exists a scientific miracle in the Qur'an [#2]

Anyone who accepts this debate should accept it based on the obligatory rules and definitions that I'm going to provide below.PREFACE:Scientific knowledge: Knowledge accumulated by systematic study and organized by general principles[1].Scientific miracle: Scientific knowledge that is accurately revealed in a qur'anic verse, although such knowledge was not discovered by humankind before the Qur'an. Note that there must be no ambiguity but a preponderance of evidence that the Qur'an mentions such scientific knowledge and that such information didn't exist prior to the times of the Prophet. (This is not claiming that a miracle could scientific as a literal interpretation might suggest. It only is a term Muslims use and which I'm forced to use if I want to disprove them...)To win the debate, Pro has to prove conclusively that the Qur'an contains a scientific miracle. On the other hand, I take the agnostic position in which I would win the debate if I disprove the miracle-claim effectively, or show that it is not supported with evidence beyond preponderance.OBLIGATORY RULES:R1- Both participants(Pro and Con) are allowed to use material from their previous debates if and only if such content is original and not plagiarized. Plagiarism doesn't only involve copying/pasting material exactly from other people without references; it also involves changing a few words and sentences while retaining the same structure, organization, linguistic style, information, images and other patterns from the original source. In case any participant in this debate violates this rule, he/she automatically receives a seven-point loss.R2- Participants must never use more than one image, and they must never have screenshots of paragraphs which allow them to exceed the character-limit. In case any participant in this debate violates this rule, he/she automatically receives a seven-point loss.R3- Pro must take the burden of proof solely by himself, because he is supposed to prove beyond the preponderance of evidence that there exists a scientific miracle(as defined above) in the Qur'an. Con takes an agnostic position and wins the debate if he could refute Pro's miracle-claim or show that the evidence for it is not beyond preponderance.R4- Pro is only allowed to provide and defend one scientific miracle-claim throughout the whole debate. Pro is not allowed to provide more than one miracle-claim. In other words, Pro must only choose one miracle-claim in the first round and continue defending it until the debate ends without presenting any new miracle-claims. In case Pro violates this rule, he/she automatically receives a seven-point loss.R5- Pro must start arguing in the first round where he must present his miracle-claim. When it comes to the final round, Pro must only say "As agreed", so that Con can respond to everything he/she presents. In case Pro violates this rule, he/she automatically receives a seven-point loss.R6- Both participants(Pro and Con) must list their citations without using URL-shorteners or directing users to other websites to see them. All the citations must be listed in text-format in the end of each entry made by the debaters. In case any participant in this debate violates this rule, he/she automatically receives a seven-point loss.R7- Both participants(Pro and Con) must accept the definitions and obligatory rules presented here, or else they will be penalized by the voters. Asking for further clarifications should be done before the debate is accepted, so that the rules and regulations are updated accordingly. INFO:Rounds: 3 (No acceptance round)Voting period: 10 days.Time to argue: 72 hours.Argument Max: 5000 characters.CITATIONS:[1] thefreedictionary.com/scientific+knowledge