Religion is incorrect

Well, I don't think you fully understand the Ontological Argument.It basically proves that if even a maximally great being could exist, which most scientists agree that it is probable, then a maximally great being must exist. If a maximally great being could exist in some world, a maximally great being must exist in all worlds. The mind was an example of a type of world it could exist in. Most of your previous argument is based on the premise of multiverses, which scientists have proven could not have happen. Three scientists, Arvin Borde, Alan Guth, and Alexander Vilenkin, debunked this in 2003 by creating experiments in which to test the theory of multiverses. They concluded that this could not possibly happen, and that there had to have been an initial singularity, and that multiverses could not occurAnd since I'm sure you will be referring to the Big Bang later on in the argument, I would like to show some of the many flaws of the Big Bang Theory. It defies the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. It relies on the existence of dark matter, which has little evidence to exist. It relies on the premise that matter can be created from nothing. Our Big Bang relies on the premise of multiverses, which have been proven cannot happen. It defies logic, for logically, something cannot come from nothing. The First Law of Thermodynamics is that matter can neither be created nor destroyed. Obviously since the entire argument of the Big Bang is the creation of matter, the Big Bang defies this law.The Second Law of Thermodynamics says that explosions can never create order, only disorder. The Big Bang being an explosion, defies this law. Dark matter has been hypothesized as basically, the missing mass of the universe which is supposed to exist. (Basically the gap in all of their theories) Dark matter is only a hypothesis and has very little evidence for its existence. Scientists define "nothing" as empty space, and not necessarily nothing whatsoever. Even scientists realize that if you have 0 matter, you cannot spontaneously have a 1 value of matter. Scientists have hypothesized that our Big Bang occurred from empty space that exists off of another multiverse (which they say could possibly have a totally new set of physical laws) But the Vilenkin-Borde-Guth experiment has eliminated the possibility of multiverses, and that there had to be an initial singularity. And finally, logically, nothing cannot create something. Just think about it, if you have 0 of something, you have 0 of something, no more. Rebuttal of some of your statements: Basically a lot of people follow religion because either they think that because it cannot be disprovenThis is not true, for the existence of a deity can be proven, as I explained in my arguments above, therefore, people can believe in religion because it is possibly correct. >Blindly following devoting your life to something is illogical.As I explained with Pascal's Wager, it is not illogical, for there is something to gain from devoting your life (which is also a very biased statement, for one does not necessarily have to give up anything to gain the benefits of the salvation) (Time does not technically exist)Why yes sir it does! Lol, look at your clock. In about 60 seconds you'll see your clock change. That is the existence of time, and time can even be used in equations and calculations. Another thing that proves time does exist is when an object is accelerated to intense speeds, time begins to change. Did you know that Russian space astronaut, Valeri Polyakov, is actually a couple seconds older than everyone else on Earth? When objects are accelerated to intense speeds, time begins to move faster. Also, black holes even have the ability to pull on not just space, but time itself, meaning time may be increased when going into a black hole. At many times, almost no morality existed in many societies. This is not true. It has been shown all throughout history that humans have always had a sense of morality. In fact, the very first laws ever written show evidence of this. The Code of Hammurabi were the first written laws ever written, which prohibited murder, rape, and theft. In every society, there has always been evidence of morality. You used the example of Neanderthals killing each other to settle arguments. People do this today, and we still realize that this act is wrong. Neanderthals were known for burying their dead in certain positions. This shows that they probably felt sympathetic for the dead. A correct explanation for this is that because the existence of the universe/macroverse is ultimately dependant on the last, the math would dictate that each time the cycle of the universe is completely identicalActually this isn't correct. Even scientists as famous as Lawrence Krauss has stated that if there was the existence of multiverses, that they could each have totally different physical laws, meaning that the math here, may not be the same math in another universe. In fact, it might well be that the multiverse contains universes with every possible set of laws. We have the laws we do simply because of the particular universe we’re in. But, of course, the philosopher can respond that the multiverse itself is governed by higher-level laws.-Lawrence KraussAnd this argument is not based on an analogy, the analogy is an easier way to understand the basis for the concept of how perfect the equations had to be in order for all life to exist. You lose a life you could have spent living the way you truly want to. Want to in your unconscious rather than devoting your lives to the teachings of something that has a 99.9% chance of not existing.This is a very biased statement. Being religious does not destroy your happiness. Go ask a preacher if he thinks he is wasting his life. He will most definitely say no, because he obviously wants to live that way. You are insisting that people will not be able to live the life you want them to live. If a person wants to live a certain way, it is their choice. And your whole 99.9% statistic is very, very biased. I have already proved the existence of a maximally great being, and the existence of an initial push.