Wierdman's Tourney: It wasn't Goldilocks' fault when she entered the home of the three bears.

I thank PR for his splendid response. Refutations/Defense: Re: One is responsible for his/her actions. My opponent made this argument as an attempt to refute some of my premises, but failed to give accurate reasoning to rebut it. His response was that it’s a ridiculous argument but didn’t state why. He then pointed out some obvious parts of the story that I already pointed out in R2 then argued that she went in after no one answered. I’ve already theoretically and legitimately explained why she entered the house in R2 and making her not responsible for her childish actions. They weren’t rebutted, therefore extend please those arguments. I’d like to note that her insanity made her gobble up the bears’ porridges, the chair being destroyed was obviously an accident, but her stupidity probably blocked her common sense on the chair being too small. As for her home status, orphans and street children like Goldilocks (assuming) probably got their clothes via donations, saying that homeless children don’t look good is kind of offensive, mind you. Oh, and homeless children aren’t always unhappy, they are very cheerful, actually. And in this case, the picture showed Goldilocks smiling is because she is eating, she probably was hungry and finally found some food, like I said. But of course, we need to consider the other arguments that she might have parents. Re: She acknowledges right from wrong. My opponent starts this contention by citing the part where Goldilocks started tasting porridges but this argument is kind of misleading. Just because the warm one was the right one does not mean that it is really the right one. This argument doesn’t really back up Goldilocks’ capacity from what’s right or wrong. One could argue that the cold one was the right one for him/her, but it isn’t really the right one. Every person has a different opinion. The picture CON showed us is a pre-teen attempting to kill a person, and we don’t know if she’s blond or not. She’s more likely to not be Goldilocks. It’s also a misleading picture since it has no relevance to the story, but nevertheless, this just shows Goldilocks’ insanity, and as an insane juvenile, she isn’t responsible for her actions. Again, Goldilocks is stupid, adding to her insanity. She had to try 2 out of the 3 chairs and beds before having the ‘right’ one for her. As for my opponent’s question, yes, it may be justifiable and the court can understand that if a juvenile delinquent who has issues goes to the middle of the woods and found an unlocked house, where she assumes it was vacant and decides to take a rest, then yes, you can argue that in court. A juvenile is not responsible for her actions, and therefore must not be taken seriously and not be at fault. Again, she had the courtesy to knock (in a house in the middle of the woods), and since no one answered, it was safe to assume no one lives there. Additional Argument: Animal Ownership Right Obviously, in real life, animals technically have no right to own a house. So if we go to court now and claim this, we can assume that the house is under the ownership of the state or that it has no ‘real’ owner, and that the bears are living in that house illegally. And who knows, probably the real owner was dead and his body was somewhere inside. Surely, it this is the case, the three bears won’t have enough evidence to prove Goldilocks’ negligence and that the case would be tossed, since the court would be asked, “Was this juvenile delinquent who has some parental or house-issues at fault for entering an unlocked vacant house located in the middle of no where? Where she had the courtesy to at least knock and then safely assumed that it was in fact vacant?” Conclusion: In conclusion, ladies and gents, I know these arguments are out of this world, but as extraordinary as it can be, it is valid and is important, as to satisfy my BOP, to argue that it wasn’t Goldilocks’ fault since she was not responsible for her actions. I rest my case for now and await PR’s response. Thanks again and good luck!