It should be Legal to throw acid at women who are Feminists

I quickly looked this up, and found much to my surprise that using "he", "his", or "him" in a sentence is often considered sexist. This is probably why my opponent tries to use gender-neutral language, it may even help explain his apparent hatred towards me. Only feminists would say such words are sexist because they search for reasons to hate men in order to feel superior which though non-violent has consequences.It takes literally 1 second to find out whether I am a man or a woman, if this is too time consuming you can just use "he or she" or "s/he". By using "they" where "he" should be used voters can be mislead. I simply feel that voters should not be mislead. When you use non gender distinquishing words like "they" or "their" it's often a good idea to refer back to a singular noun to avoid confusion e.g."If your child is thinking about a gap year, they can get good advice from this website." "A researcher has to be completely objective in their findings."Anyway back to the debate, I'll just try to make my position clear. I am anti-feminist, not anti-women. I think I have a better idea of what I am. If you read closely you will find I was talking about feminists growing hairy legs, and putting on weight, not women in general. I have no problem with women who who want to grow hairy arms and legs, or who want to put on weight. The only people who have a problem with such people are misogynists who my opponent confuses with anti-feminists. You should already know Feminism is a movement supporting equal rights for women, and women only! Thus feminists do not care about equality, their goal is solely to feel superior to men. So they don't strive to be happy; they seek comfort which is a low goal. Feminists will have you believe that anti-feminists are misogynists because they obviously want to believe they are better. Very few people are actually misognists, these people agree with fat shaming etc and will tend to be anti-feminists, whereas anti-feminists just oppose feminism, so will be against things like racial and gender quotas in employment.Let me explain why I mentioned hairy and fat women, if a woman is fat or hairy and makes no effort she probably isn't bothered about attracting men, men who find her unnattractive will just walk past and approach women who they do find attractive. They won't hate the woman. Feminists ask women to let their body hair grow in the name of feminism and go on catwalks and participate in campaigns to send out the message that hairy women are sexy, and fat is sexy etc. However if I go along to a woman and tell her what she should find attractive, she'd think I was arrogant, because that is what it is. Feminists make men feel ashamed of finding a healthy woman attractive. When a man sees a hairy and/or fat woman, due to feminism, he might naturally think she is a feminist, and might not simply walk past her, but choose to insult her. Feminism produces misogynists, that is the intention of feminists because the only thing they care about is feeling superior. Sorry about not explaining this earlier. I have listed various problems including killing sprees. I could have gone into more detail about why feminism is a problem but it would be too timely. Clearly the purpose of making it legal to throw acid at feminists is not to change feminists, they still won't value men even if acid is poured on them which is why you'd have to hate women to do something like that. Some problems asscoiated with femimism will be reduced if it is legal to throw hydrochloric acid at feminists, however the main purpose of making this legal is to decrease acid attacks and their severity. I believe it should be legal to throw hydrochloric acid at women who are feminists (not women simply because they're hairy or fat), and I do not think "the government should tell the people to do these acid attacks". If you look at the graph I showed in round one, acid attacks have remained at the same level or higher before laws were introduced in Bangladesh, and I've also provided evidence showing that acid attacks are increasing worldwide despite the fact there are laws against acid attacks. In the U.K. they have doubled in a 10 year period. These facts do not change my opponents belief that the law deters acid attackers. More should be done to stop acid attacks, regulating the sale of acids is not enough. We need a law which actually protects people, not comforts people by letting them know someone will be punished. If my suggestion is implemented people will be punished if they throw lethal acids like nitric, and suphuric, or anything other than hydrochloric, and if a misogynist (the type who throws acid) does not target a feminist he will be severely punished.