Westboro Baptist Church is wrong in protesting at soldier's funerals

"If homosexuality is not agreed with by a mojority(sic) of people, then socially it is not acceptable." How does the majority opinion on a subject decide if it is inherently tight or wrong? In the eighteenth century the majority of people believed slavery was right and in the dark ages most people believed that the Earth was flat. And does this mean that there is something different about homosexuality in parts of the world where it is more socially acceptable? What makes it more right in Europe then in the US. Were Jews really less of people then everyone else in Germany during WW2? I am not turning this into a debate about homosexuality. I am still refuting each and everyone of your points. "Also, since this is my last speech, saying that you will provide a source proving America is secular is abuse. If you want a good debate, you would provide me a source so I can refute it. I allowed you time to refute my sources by allowing you to have the last speech." What are you talking about? I provided the source and gave you a whole round to refute it which you did not. I clearly allowed you time to refute my source(the Constitution) if you could. You did not so we may assume that the US is based on secular values. "Once again, you are abusing this debate. Now, instead of homosexuality, you are tuning this into a debate about religion, which it's not. Its a debate on the moral stance of WBC's actions." You wrote that America was based on religious values and that the WBC was going against these values. It was my job to show you that America is not based on religious values and so the WBC could not be going against them as they are nonexistent. "Now here you go again with religion. It doesnt(sic) matter if there is any physical proof or not, or at least none you can see. It is based on the beliefs of myself and the majority of Americans. Since the majority of Americans adhere to the Bible by claiming to be Christians, then the moral stance on what WBC is doing is against the beliefs of the majority of Americans, and thus they are wrong in what they do." You are such a conformist. You believe that since the majority does not support specific life stance then it cannot be right. Was slavery ever right ? Were Jews ever inferior to Germans? Your argument is fallacious in that you do not show why the WBC is wrong. You just show that they are a minority opinion. This would have been an easy debate for you to win if you would have brought forth a real argument. "It does not matter if America is based on faith or not, it matters if WBC is making the wrong decision in the majority of Americans, which they are." You wrote that America was based on faith. I was merely correcting a clearly misguided view. And again, were the abolitionists of the nineteenth century wrong just because they were a minority opinion? "Basically, so many American are against what WBC is doing, they are taking counter protest measures against them. And, as this source said, homosexual Americans joined in Anti-protests in their so called "Sodomobile". This debate is not about whether or not homosexuality is wrong, religion false, or protesting Constitutionality. It is a raw debate on the morals behind WBC's protests, which are completely and utterly uselss to WBC, and harming to the families of our fallen soldiers. If the homosexual community is willing to try and stop WBC's protest, then obviously WBC is wrong." The only reason you are saying that they are wrong is because they hurt people's feelings and because they are a minority opinion. It used to be a minority opinion that evolution explained our origins or that the Earth was actually round. You have still failed to bring any real arguments against the WBC's right to protest their minority point of view. "In conclusion, vote Pro. Not only is my opponent constanly(sic) getting off subject, but he isn't even debating the topic. I have shown evidence that Westboro Baptist Church is morally wrong on their stance of protesting soldier's funerals, because Christians and homosexuals alike are opposed to WBC's actions." Vote con please. Pro's only arguments have been that some people disagree with the WBC's stance. Pro believes that if anyone disagrees with something then that must be wrong. This is a clearly fallacious argument. Were the Allie's wrong because the Nazi's disagreed with them? Pro has based his arguments on horribly misguided lines of thinking. It is because of this that I set aside some of my room to clear things up. I was able to do this and still refute pro's weak arguments. While I personally agree with pro he has backed up his claim rather poorly. He thinks that if someone disagrees with you then you must be wrong.