Is the metaverse simulation theory valid

Firstly: Arguments are arguments and as such are not flawed. 1) Stand and look at the heavens on a balmy clear night and the universe may well appear to be appealing, Massive and harmonious. I personally might go for amazing, Vast and confident, But that's being very subjective, Earthbound and somewhat short sighted. Let's not forget that the Earth itself is never always clear and balmy, At times the Earth's surface can be a very hostile and unforgiving environment. 2) I would suggest that a Solar System is what a Solar System does, Just as the Universe is what the Universe does. These might seem like glib statements, But what I'm trying to say is that the universe has to function somehow. I would propose that there are two basic options: Chaos. Where everything is random, Unrepetitive, Non-sequential and ungoverned. Order. Where everything conforms to the inevitability of natural laws and processes. Clearly evidence suggests the latter, But as I stated previously it is a huge leap of faith to assume that order is not governed by natural laws but controlled by an unknown intelligence. And as one commentator has rightly pointed out, There is what might be regarded as an incongruous discrepancy between planetary revolution and solar orbit. The Earth is not quite the perfect distance from the Sun or the Earth does not quite have a perfect rotation. 3) The universe: Space and all existing matter. (Massive from a human viewpoint). The extent of matter is obviously limited by the duration of the creation event thus far, Whatever that creation event might have been. Theoretically the potential of space is infinite and therefore a rational proposition, This rationale being based on the theory that matter is extending into infinite space, Rather than space extending concurrently with matter as part of the creation event. 4) Creation by what ever means relies upon the something from nothing principle. All we can truly say is that existence should be impossible and we have no actual answer as to why that is not the case. Simulation theory is no less dependant upon the something from nothing principle, Maybe what we observe is simulated, But who or what projects that simulation and who or what created the simulators creator etc. Etc. Ultimately Simulation theory is just another manifestation of the God theory. Although the Big Bang theory fails to take into account what may or may not have preceded it, It does nonetheless attempt to start at zero and move forwards. Whereas God and Simulation theories start at One and conveniently ignore everything that precedes One. In that respect the Big Bang is one step ahead of it's theoretical counterparts. 5) Creation is creation, If there was no creation event, Then there would be nothing, We do not need Albert Einstein or Elon Musk to tell us that. Both were or are persons of above average intelligence, Both capable of extending and facilitating human knowledge and understanding, But neither has the answer to the biggest question of all and that is, How can something appear form nothing. The "Hyperloop" is one more possible technological advancement or a further possible advancement in the manipulation of matter, I would regard this as evolution in progress, A process that ultimately, May or may not rely upon human input. And just for the record, The Hyperloop is based upon the Vactrain which was first proposed by Robert Goddard in 1904. If we go back to 1799 George Medhurst conceived and patented the Atmospheric Railway which basically worked on similar principles to the Vactrain and Hyperloop. Money is simply money and being a billionaire places you no nearer to the creation. Food for thought: Maybe humans created the simulator and evolution is a perpetual loop. But of course, That still overlooks the something from nothing principle.