Rape is not wrong. You are.

I am the same person that posted the same subject on reddit.com. Due to the fact that I have posted this argument and my response in a hurry, I forgot to disclose the fact that I had already and also posted the same argument on the reddit before. So if you ever tried to accuse me of plagiarism, I cannot do that with my own writing. With this in mind, let us critically analyze your "argument." The fact that rape is one of the diverse forms of sexual activity is critically relevant to the debate, and to every rape discussion. The social indoctrination in regard to rape has greatly misled people to falsely interpret rape as only an act of crime, with you being one of these people, so the clear realization and admission of the fact that rape is sex can help us smash the current, narrow confinement of our perception of rape and open our intelligence to a wide range of possibilities concerning how we can correctly and freshly recognize rape - from "just a crime" to "another human sexual act" and many more. So this is where you were incorrect with your analysis. In addition, rape is an act, which exists completely outside of the realms of words - professionally called "semantics". To view rape as a mere semantic problem shows your failure to grasp the fact that rape is what is "done", not "said". Why is it illegal to sell firearms to mentally disabled people? It is because such act has a high likelihood of causing the firearm to be misused, leading to physical, material harm to the bodies and properties of other people. If there was no worry for such damage, then it would be totally fine for any of us to sell firearms to maniacs and for them to purchase one. You incorrectly identified a fallacy in my argument because you lack understanding facts that serve basis for arguments. Try to remember how "validity" and "soundless" differs, and how "strength" and "cogency" does. Without you correctly comprehending the facts, hanging only onto discovering logical fallacies will reveal your lack of insight. You then presented a list of purported psychological effects of rape, mistakenly assuming that such a long list of psychological symptoms would lend strong support for your argument. Actually, the list provides more support for my position. Raped females are gravely troubled by those symptoms because the socially constructed notion that rape is bad, harmful and negative had already been deeply indoctrinated inside their brain long before their rape. And when they finally experienced their rape, the pre-installed brainwashing got triggered for its moment of realization. Then, how would those females react if the social indoctrination was very different? Their reactions would be very different too. This is my point, which cannot be more clear and concise: If those females were not brainwashed with the current social construction about rape, they would not even be able to suffer from those miserable psychological conditions you have listed. To this point of mine, you have no counterargument except uttering that "these effects shall follow suit" without any evidence and any argument at all. You also muttered "I don't think you have an understanding of how a vagina works." without supplying me with any argument or explanation as to why you made such a claim. I know why - you just don't have any cogent argument founded upon physical, concrete evidence to justify your stance. Please be reminded that I am not insulting your intelligence or your level of knowledge; I am merely pointing out that there can be no cogent argument backed by concrete evidence that can be used against my stance on the social construction of rape brainwashing. I do appreciate you for giving me something to laugh at with the "study" you presented. You did successfully demonstrate a lucid case of the fallacies: "Correlation does not mean causation" and "Post hoc ergo propter hoc." Stringent rape laws and a lower chance of civil war or strife do not have any causal connection between each other. Sure they may coexist, because in a country that's unstable with a high probability for a civil war lacks the amount of law enforcement and focus to focus on rape - remember that survival(aka. life) is more important than any rape. Meanwhile, a country that is stable and has a low probability has enough law enforcement resources to focus on carrying out rape-related laws. Yet there is no concrete evidence that stronger rape laws cause less chance for a civil war. If you still can't understand, imagine you go to Syria now and demand more strict rape laws to be enforced. It will not stop the civil war going on in there, although they may behead you for being really brainless and irritating - which is why not even a radical feminist group would even dare visit the place right now. If this type of "study", which is nothing but another fallacious nonsense already abounding in academia, is what you can provide, I strongly suggest that you thoroughly format your brain and learn everything again anew. In your fun research in the field of rape, did you really not come across the fact that rape is one of the most un- and under-reported crimes? You show those tables as if the numbers were ever closer to the numbers of rape in reality, while it at best only deals with reported ones without any mention about those that go silent. Didn't it really occur to you as to what the figures would be be if all those unreported were actually reported? Whlie nobody can be certain about the real figures of rape incidence, researches can tell you one thing in a completely harmonious agreement - more rape exists than reported. So, overall, you have not been able to refute my point with a cogent argument based on proper, concrete evidence. The points you have made have been, to put it politely, decimated like the WTC on 9/11/2001 due to your lack of distinction between acts and words, correct insight into facts, and proper understanding of causal links and statistics, while you misidentified a fallacy and presented a purely nonsensical "study"(Oh Dear...). In order to help you, I ask you again. I argue that "It is the case that people hate/fear rape, because they have been brainwashed by society to believe it so." For you to refute my position, you should present your argument as follows: "It is NOT the case that people hate/fear rape because they have been brainwashed by society to believe it so." Hope this helps. I await your response.