Jesus could not be the messiah as per his 2 genealogies

"The genealogy I provided on left side of the lineage was Mary's, or are you referring to something else? " See Luke 3:23. Joseph is the son of Heli. So why do you think it is Mary's genealogy? Of course they needed an explanation for the discrepancy! And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed ) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,... "Numbers 27:1-11" The word inheritance does mean "possession" Look at Genesis 31:14 Rachel and Leah responded, "That"s fine with us! We won"t inherit any of our father"s wealth anyway. https://www.blueletterbible.org... This does not mean that the women's children will have the same tribe than the mother. See Number 36:6 This is what the LORD commands concerning the daughters of Zelophehad: Let them marry anyone they like, as long as it is within their own ancestral tribe. Thus they need to marry from the same tribe not to mix thing up. Furthermore, Mary's line goes through Nathan, not Solomon. 1 Chronicle 28 "Yet the Lord, the God of Israel, chose me from my whole family to be king over Israel forever. He chose Judah as leader, and from the tribe of Judah he chose my family, and from my father"s sons he was pleased to make me king over all Israel. 5 Of all my sons"and the Lord has given me many"he has chosen my son Solomon to sit on the throne of the kingdom of the Lord over Israel. 6 He said to me: "Solomon your son is the one who will build my house and my courts, for I have chosen him to be my son, and I will be his father. 7 I will establish his kingdom forever if he is unswerving in carrying out my commands and laws, as is being done at this time." 8 "So now I charge you in the sight of all Israel and of the assembly of the Lord, and in the hearing of our God: Be careful to follow all the commands of the Lord your God, that you may possess this good land and pass it on as an inheritance to your descendants forever. See what it is say about Solomon "that you may possess this good land and pass it on as an inheritance to your descendants forever." So Luke's genealogy is useless. Why would we expect anything different for the messiah? Psalm 110:1 Jesus was never king, and less king over all the earth. The messiah, who will come soon will be king over all the earth. Acts 2:29-36 Using the new-testament is useless, of course it claims Jesus is the messiah. That does not make it so. The Hebrew Bible (old testament) only is as per this debate is the only inspired word of G-d. Ezekiel 21:26-27 That may be the messiah, but it does not mean it is Jesus. Because Jesus does not fulfil the lineage requirement, we must wait for the rightful person. The following came up from the towns of Tel Melah, Tel Harsha, Kerub, Addon and Immer, but they could not show that their families were descended from Israel: The descendants of Delaiah, Tobiah and Nekoda 652. And from among the priests: The descendants of Hobaiah, Hakkoz and Barzillai (a man who had married a daughter of Barzillai the Gileadite and was called by that name). These searched for their family records, but they could not find them and so were excluded from the priesthood as unclean. Ezra 2. "I addressed that in my 1st response. " Joseph Adopted Jesus as his own son giving him all legal rights involving heirship." See how the queens and kings' descendant of England need to be from the Blood-line! http://www.wargs.com... Also, Joseph line is cursed and thus totally utterly useless! "2 Samuel 7:16 says: "Your kingdom shall be made sure forever before me; your throne shall be established for ever." This must mean that the kingdom of David would be established and secured by a descendant."" This does not prove Jesus is the messiah. Just that David, through Solomon will always have someone who's right is to be the messiah, the king. And in the last day, a descendant of David will reign as Psalm 2 says.