Creationism as truth should not be taught in schools (Contender: Con)

Glad to have you as a contender. First of all, let me make one thing clear. Evolution has so much evidence pointing in its direction that it might as well be an established fact as an explanation for the diversity of species. We have evidence from embryology, geographical distribution, observation of species' characteristics, fossils and genetics. Let me say that almost all available evidence we have points in the direction of evolution. That's why it has been a well-established pillar of science, with countless experts in the field researching it, with the first scientific paper about it written more than a century ago. 1) Embryology shows human embryos have actual slits like gills early on. This is the remnants left by fish billions of years ago. It may sound laughable, so I would suggest you Google it up and find out about it with a skeptical mind. I'm not lying. 2) Fossils show the gradual change of an organism through time, for example how Homo Habilis gradually became more "human" from being ape-like. Countless of other species also have fossils that show the gradual change into a new species. 3) Geographical distribution explains how organisms spread out with the continental drifts, like how a fennec fox evolved different characteristics to suit the desert, while the Arctic fox develops its own to suit the cold. Their 4) characteristics show how they evolved differently to suit their environment; along with observable similar characteristics of a group from the same ancestor, such as Darwin's reports on the birds of Galapagos Islands. 5) Genetics confirms it, like how human DNA is 96% similar to our biological cousins', chimpanzees. It is the same for every species on Earth. All of these are observable from physical fossils to microscopes to obvious characteristics. For your two rules, I just beg to ask, what are your suggestions to document a process over millions of years? I see you don't understand evolution very well. Please do try to discredit something experts have worked on for 150 years when you have little understanding of it. Makes a good show. On the other hand, creationism. As Con has demonstrated in his argument, there is likely no other evidence of creationism than the Bible. Why is the Bible unreliable? 1) If you use the fallacy that if evolution was wrong, the Bible must be right, the same can be said for all the other religious texts. Same for if science was wrong about lightning, Thor must exist. 2) The Bible was written thousands of years ago by people without as much knowledge about the natural world as we have today. 3) There is no evidence of the Bible's explanation of the origins of species to be true. 4) More people believing in something does not make it any more true. It's called the popularity fallacy. In addition, here is some evidence in contradiction to creation. 1) There is no evidence for Noah's flood, neither is there enough water to drown the tallest mountain. 2) Noah's ark would be improbable, as Noah and his family had neither the experience nor the materials to build it. 3) 2 of every species on the ark is improbable, as just one brachiosaurus would have taken up 30 metres and weighed 50 tons. 4) What did the carnivores eat on the ark? If not the herbivores, more food would be required to carry on board to feed every animal for a year. 5) Animals like polar bears or kangaroos would have difficulty making it to the Middle East to board the ark. In reality, this is explained by geographical distribution, which points to evolution. 6) There is no evidence for creation. 7) The Garden of Eden has never been found. 8) No fossils of humans with dinosaurs. In creation, humans coexisted with dinosaurs while there is not a single fossil of a human with a dinosaur. Dinosaur fossils are much deeper in the soil as they lived millions of years ago. 9) With evidence from radiometric dating, soil samples, ice samples and countless other sources, we know the Earth is much older than 6000 years as proposed by creation. 10) Genetics does not show humans are descended from a first human couple, as creation suggests. Now that credibility has been established for evolution over creation, let's move to the other side of the topic. Should a fairy tale still be taught in schools? Simply, no, as people do not want dragons and Santa to be taught as literal truth in schools, creation should not be taught at all.