Donald Trump's Policies Are Just

Let's start by countering the previously made arguments. 1) Immigration Pro states that "The jobs of deportation would also go to Americans and would eventually help out the economy! " This is wrong, because Migrants help the U. S. economy a lot. As I have already explained with . http://www.epi.org... . Migrants contribute more than 12 billion $ to the US Economy only in taxes. I have never said that Pro said that Mexicans were rapists and criminals. These claims and false accusations were made by Trump himself. And since we're debating on the legitimacy of his policies, I thought of adding them in. In a way, thanks for admitting that Mexicans are not criminals, because Donald Trump himself has claimed that they are, multiple times on multiple occasions on his immigrant policy and "building a wall". Pro has not in any way countered my point about the feasibility of building a wall on the border. Let me restate my point, "With an estimated cost of $4 million per mile, building an additional 700 miles of a border wall along the U. S. -Mexican border would cost about $2.8 billion. Also, immigrant labor " which currently represents some 20 percent of the construction labor force " won"t be building that wall on the cheap, so you better plan to budget some extra coin to afford unionized U. S. bricklayers at $22/hour. " . http://wapo.st... 2) Ban on Muslims The site which I had linked said "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on". This is his actual statement and I haven't changed or edited anything at all. Now I don't know what Pro can't understand but "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on" does not in any way mean "temporary". Donald Trump is known to have contradict himself in many instances, going from supporting something dearly to hating it all of a sudden and we shouldn't be surprised if he does so again. I will give citations later on, in this round. The next paragraph is quite funny to read, because I realise my opponent does not know the difference between Islam and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Let me make this absolutely clear however, ISIS operates only in Iraq and Syria. All the Other 3 countries Pro has listed (Iran, Yemen and KSA) are actually completely against ISIS. Saudi Arabia and the UAE actually part of the Islamic Military Alliance, determined to fight ISIL. . https://en.wikipedia.org... Iran even went up to the point of asking China to join in and fight. . http://www.jpost.com... I have not made any real argument regarding ISIS? I actually have. But first, let me make it crystal clear that I have not admitted what Con claims in his last paragraph under Ban on Muslims. The actual statement from my first round was "Policies like banning Muslims will be considered a downright offense in their eyes and they will conduct more of these hideous crimes like mass shootings and bomb blasts to get their message across. " Just removing the first three words and then claiming that I was the one who spoke it, in my opinion is very cowardly. The entire meaning of the sentence, as well as what i wanted to convey is lost because my opponent used my speech "out-of context". What I indeed meant to say was that Trump's stupid policies will just infuriate ISIS extremists. They will see Trump as a threat, and actually already have. I have covered this all up in R1. 3) Obamacare OK right off the bat, Pro claims that I have not made many "statistical arguments". This is false. I have included many, many statistics of how effective Obamacare is and only couldn't include more because of the character limit. I never even said once, that repealing needs to be discouraged, granted if they make sense. Obamacare has intensively helped the American population. The statistics have been posted beforehand. Pro's argument is basically baseless. His only citation is a link to a page, to which most people disagree to (Check the comments). 4) Global Warming OK, This one kind of caught me off-guard because my opponent honestly believes that Global Warming is fake and "Global Warming is also though to be a liberal scare-tactic to stop government pollution". Now, I could go on for ages arguing to say Global Warming is real. But then, there's a limit. So. I'll link down a few sites that help to destroy any misconceptions you have with Global Warming. . http://globalwarmingisreal.com... . https://www.nwf.org... Also, my opponent thinks that it's OK for the US to be "only" second as the biggest polluter. I don't know how that is okay in any way. -- Moving, on anyway. Donald Trump is known to often tell inaccurate things at conventions about various things. . http://www.vox.com... Lastly, let's talk about Trumps foreign Policy. Donald Trump has made many surprising self-contradictions which make it hard to believe he;s running for POTUS, 1)Trump claimed that ISIS is now making millions of dollars off Libyan oil sales. "And now ISIS is making millions and millions of dollars a week selling Libya oil," Trump said. "And you know what? We don't blockade, we don't bomb, we don't do anything about it. It's almost as if our country doesn't even know what's happening, which could be a fact and could be true. " He has made this false statement before, also in the context of blaming Clinton for destroying Libya. The fact is that ISIS does fund itself through the sale of oil, but not in Libya. The Washington Post did an entire piece on the inaccuracy of that and a similar statement he previously made, concluding ultimately that ISIS has not claimed any oil at all in Libya. . http://bit.ly... 2)Let's call this one a head-scratching contradiction. One of Trump"s main foreign policy talking points has been about NATO, the 28-member alliance founded in 1949. Today, he threatened that during a Trump presidency the United States might disband NATO if other countries didn't start spending more on national defense. "Only 4 of 28 other member countries besides America, are spending the minimum required 2 percent of GDP on defense," Trump said (the number is actually five). Yet just moments later, he talked about the importance of sticking with allies, this time in reference to Israel. . http://sputniknews.com... 3) And there are MANY MORE. . http://politi.co... :)