The Biblical God is more credible than the other religions' gods.

-This proves there were problems.... otherwise there would be no New Testament. If he could have removed sin in a less painful way, then how would it have been truly meaningful?He boldly states in the New testament that Sodom and Gomorrah will be more bearable than the city in which someone does not listen to your word or welcome you. If he had any problems with Sodom and Gomorrah he would not repeat it even worse. And i already addressed how meaningful the sacrifice was,but you didn't understand. Temporary pain doesn't pay for infinite pain. When someone goes to hell they suffer forever,according to the bible,but if the point was to remove the sin,so we do not go to hell,he just suffered a little compared to the infinite pain someone in hell would suffer,and after that he got to heaven,where there no suffering,everything is gladness.There was no loss.Even his body wasn't lost,because he revived.Do you really think some pain equals the same as infinite pain?Also,why we are discussing if the bible is a story of love if it is irrelevant to its credibility?-First of all, this sentence is incoherent. "Doesn"t fulfill" and "was created to do so"? I'll assume what it says and go off of that.What i meant is that the purpose of the new testament was to fulfill the prophecies of the first one,but we didn't testify if the prophecies were really fulfilled,and the testament was created by people who worshiped the old one,and i doubt someone would write the stories exactly was they happened while blinded by faith.By saying that, you're saying "We have new laws put in place, but they aren't meant to change from the old laws". Isn't your God unchangeable?Why not create laws that can be used at any time?He is omnipotent,so he would be able t do it wouldn't him? -So because pain is temporary that makes it meaningless? Then by that logic working out would be meaningless. The pain, the burn and soreness do not mean anything because it only lasts a little while? We know that's false because becoming stronger, healthier, tougher all comes after that pain.It wouldn't mean anything if to get just a little more stronger you would need infinite pain,burn and soreness.Would you work out if you knew that you would need infinite pain to get just a little stronger,but that by just saying "I want to get stronger!",you would get stronger,tougher and healthier? I've already provided you with why his sacrifice was meaningful, but since you neglected it I shall say it once more. His sacrifice was for all of mankind, so that we would be able to have forgiveness and salvation without being held accountable to living a perfect life, because that's impossible.Perfect life?Like when he stole a colt?"[Jesus] sent two of his disciples, Saying, Go ye into the village . . . ye shall find a colt tied, whereon yet never man sat: loose him, and bring him hither. And if any man ask you, Why do ye loose him? thus shall ye say unto him, Because the Lord hath need of him. . . . And as they were loosing the colt, the owners thereof said unto them, Why loose ye the colt? And they said, The Lord hath need of him." Luke 19:29-34 Or when he refused to help a woman that bowed down to him crying?"A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, "Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession." Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, "Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us." He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel." The woman came and knelt before him. "Lord, help me!" she said. He replied, "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs." Matthew 15:22-26Or when he cursed a tree because he was hungry and there was no figs?"The next day as they were leaving Bethany, Jesus was hungry. Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to find out if it had any fruit. When he reached it, he found nothing but leaves, because it was not the season for figs. Then he said to the tree, "May no one ever eat fruit from you again." And his disciples heard him say it." Mark 11:12-14Or when he overturned the tables of the moneychangers of the temple?"On reaching Jerusalem, Jesus entered the temple area and began driving out those who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves, and would not allow anyone to carry merchandise through the temple courts." Mark 11:15-16Or when he said you need to hate your family and life itself to be his disciple?"Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and even life itself, cannot be my disciple." Luke 14:26That's not what i would call a perfect life.The only reason he didn't help the women was that she was Canaanite,but in other parts of the bible he tells us to love our enemies,and the commandments say you can't steal.And some parts show how Jesus was emotional and childish,nothing like the image of a wise man people think of he is.Instead of overturning the tables why not explain to everyone why it is wrong to sell stuff in the temple instead of going around turning the tables or just make some figs appear instead of cursing the tree(by the way,the tree died later)?And wouldn't hate your father and mother go against the commandments?-Already addressed that first sentence above. So, because he "didn't" destroy it, that makes him less omnipotent?Because it would be more rational than throwing your son in the world just to die at the cross,apart from being able to remove sin.What about just forgiving everyone and fixing them not to sin before entering heaven?God created humans with brains and intelligence, he also gave us the Bible so that, put two and two together, we could open our eyes and see the truth about him.So why not make the bible more clear?If he wanted us to follow it blindly why he would gave us enough intelligence to demand proof for things instead of just believing?If there's any reason why that's not understood it's solely based on the individual not choosing to accept that and understand it. Once we accept that we are sinners, ask for forgiveness, and he comes into our lives the sin is "removed" .Why would someone just pretend to be an atheist knewing that what they were denying is true and that they would be tortured eternally?That changes the heart. Sin is not a tangible thing, you can't just grab it and throw it away. When we ask God into our hearts, he comes in and the transformation begins.If god is not able to do it he is not omnipotent.Also,the heart is just a muscle that pumps blood trough your body.Why wouldn't a omniscient being have basic knowledge of anatomy?The reason is that people from that time thought the heart was like the brain,because it is only seemingly active part of the body,and because it stops when you die.Egyptians removed almost every organ or the body before burying pharaohs,but they didn't remove the heart because the believed it was where the conciousness was located.-Again, I already addressed this false claim earlier. Please read with the intention of understanding. Just because he's omniscient, doesn't mean he's forcefully making you choose what you do.Indeed.But he is omniscient,so he knows what we are going to do,and we are bound by the laws of physics.You don't think about something without external things affecting your mind.Give the mugger the money or don't. Two choices and two outcomes. God never said both outcomes would be enjoyable.The problem is that the mugger is invisible,and apparently can't choose not to kill us,while being omnibenevolent,and the only hint you have that the mugger is there is a guy behind you screaming "There is a mugger in front of you!If you don't give all your money to him he will kill you!".So you believe that we should all stay in the dark and not gain knowledge when we make an error?No,i believe that forcing a punishment is wrong when a child can think and learn with its own errors.-I"m glad you brought up the jail analogy, gives me a better way to explain it different from how i did above. Jail CAN be for life if a person continues to do wrong. It can be for life because the person would not live enough to pay for everything they did,but it is still for life,not eternal,you will never found someone that stayed 100 years in prison!And even if the only thing you do is not believe in God because he didn't gave you enough evidence,even if you were the best person alive winning a nobel of peace you would receive the same punishment as Hitler.I gave you tangible, irrefutable evidence that even historians acknowledge; yet you try to keep saying it's false.I will try to explain to you carefully.Before the cambrian explosion happened thare was already life.When it happened not all creatures popped into existence,it was just a period where things evolved incredibly faster,to create more complex lifeforms.These lifeforms were the ancestors of the majority of life in this planet,so when the explosion happened there was no apes,no dogs,no cats,no mankind.Saying that we don't know therefore it was God is a GotG argument,which is a fallacious argument that fills things we don't know with an explanation that will not lead us to anything and that will not prove anything.Saying that your evidence is irrefutable will not make it irrefutable by the way.-Again your site and the correct site are completely different sites. Please, read above. 1959 is before 2014 so that's irrelevant.It is because that site you are using is cherry-picking stuff that was alredy debunked a lot of time ago.Also,the post was made in 2013,not 2014,and it says that "In 1959, Turkish army captain Llhan Durupinar discovered an unusual shape while examining aerial photographs of his country.",which is the same site in the site i gave you,which gained the name of the captain who discovered it,Durupinar.I will rebut the rest later.No chars.