I will not break a rule

"I cannot type "I have not violated a rule" or "He was violated multiple" or many other things in discussion of violations because of the possible winner of this debate's Rule #14. Thus, by the possible winner of this debate's own standards, I win because my ability to discuss rules has been limited." [In the. quote above. Pro. typed both. "I have not violated a rule" and. "He was violated multiple" without. violating the. rule, thus. negating his. argument.] [The probable loser of the debate can't really disagree with violation #2.] "Rule #13: None of my opponent's rules may be of exceeding difficulty for PRO. As of current, my rules must be written in correct 3-line rhyme scheme, with alliteration, without making references to 'the possible winner of this debate' without using that exact wording (which very much throws the rhyme scheme off, let me tell you.) I'll let you, the voter, be the judge, but it certainly is taking more and more effort to create these rules. It certainly seems to me to fit the category of 'exceeding difficulty.'" [Nowhere in the probable loser of the debate's rules does it say that correct rhyme scheme must be used, just that all of the endings rhyme. The alliteration. also does not. need to be. in context as. that was. not part. of the. rule.] "I've certainly been busted! It was a typo on my part and a nice find at that. 'Probable winner' refers to nobody in particular, so I suppose that I've wasted a chance at posting a perfectly good rule as rule #23 as it stands applies to nobody." [This is not true as the statement "the probable winner of this debate" has to refer to himself or the probable loser of the debate because he and the probable loser of the debate are the only two participating in this debate. Either you've. broken. rule #22 or. you have. broken rule. #23 in one. way that. is described. lower. in the. post.] "However, Rule #24 states "the possible winner of this debate must wanna give the iguana marijuana" which is a clear command." [Yes, you commanded the probable loser of the debate to want to give cannabis to iguanas, the probable loser of the debate stated that the probable loser of the debate does. Extend the probable loser of the debate's arguments.] "As I can be quite vain, I made a rule forcing the possible winner of this debate to compliment me. It is definately a rule that must be followed." [You made one spelling error (definately -> definitely) there and this violates the rule that you stated for yourself in #23. Also complimenting my opponent in no way relates to discussions about rules or creation of rules which is why it goes against rule #4.] "I stated "thrice compliment me, by telling me that I have a body as hot as a 100 degree temp-or-ize as blue as the sea." 1. Paraphrasing is possible. There is no reason the wording must be exact, just that I must be told that I've got a smokin' build. 2. As the conjunction used is 'or' and not 'and', the 2nd compliment could instead be utilized. I could thrice be made aware of my beautiful eyes." [As an argument to rebut the statement that paraphrasing is possible: the probable loser of the debate has no doubt that if the probable loser of the debate had complimented you using any different compliment you would have also called that violating the rule, if you only wanted three compliments you could have just left it as that and not told the probable loser of the debate how to compliment you. As the rule is currently phrased the probable loser of the debate actually notices that it is in violation of foundation rule #7 where the probable loser of the debate violates previous rules if the probable loser of the debate follows this one, or the probable loser of the debate violates this one if the probable loser of the debate follow this previous rule.] The probable loser of the debate's next 3 rules. 32.) Pro must use three words greater than thirteen letters long or he will lose 33.) Pro must from now on refer to himself in the third person viewpoint 34.) Pro must refer to himself once every fifty words or else you lose http://www.youtube.com...