Gay men should pay higher car insurance premiums than straight men

To tackle his argument: ==CON:== >>Why should gay men pay more for insurance? Because they are the most dangerous drivers on the road, that's why. Like women, they lack spatial awareness which means they are unable to navigate properly, judge speeds and distances accurately or perform manoeuvres such as parallel parking effectively. . http://www.thaindian.com...... Also, like women, they are typically preoccupied with thoughts of things like shopping and flowers which means they do not concentrate their minds on their driving, which leads to accidents. << ==Rebuttal== CON reasons in this quote that because Male drivers are proven through a test to be better drivers than women, they should have cheaper car insurance than those worse than them. I. E. Worse driving --> More expensive Insurance. However, currently this is far from the case. Take this example I have pulled from a car insurance website. Filling out the same details, but only changing the sex on each occasion, I found Women get cheaper quotes then Men. Quotes: (Male): . https://services.hibernian.ie... (Female): . https://services.hibernian.ie... The difference in cost in this case is less than 1 thousand (€), but it serves a point. My opponent has pulled a single case study, whereas all insurance companies offer cheaper car insurance to females. The reasoning is simple, men tend to be erratic and drive faster, thus causing more accidents. Women drive slower, thus claiming more accidents. Therefore: Less accidents --> Less claims --> More profit for the company --> Charging the erratic side more Because you have proven Gay men have similar driving to females, then it should apply to them. Source: . http://www.msnbc.msn.com... Although your source proves that through spacial awareness and navigation Women, Gays and Lesbians are inferior, I have proven they are also less prone to crashing, which is the foundation of car insurance. ==CON:== >>However, unlike women, who are naturally cautious, gay men are still male and, as such, are risk-takers - that's why so many of them contract AIDS as the result of having exchanged bodily fluids with other homosexuals. << ==Rebuttal:== My opponent has grouped homosexuals in the same driving class as Women, therefore they should have the same car insurance all round. I also find contracting AIDS through sexual relations does not make them more rist takers then men, who risk having a child every time they have sex. ==CON:== >>In Saudi Arabia, women are banned from driving and all gays are, well, banned altogether. That's probably going too far, but certainly, the insurance companies should price gay men off the roads for the sake of their profits and also for the safety of all other road users. << ==Rebuttal:== The ideals of Saudi Arabia are not the ideals of Britain and ireland. If you rob in Britain or Ireland, you get a prison sentence. You get your hands cut off in Saudi Arabia for such activities. I have also proven more gay men and female drivers on the roads as opposed to male drivers actually gives the insurance company a profit, therefore insurance companies should, sadly, price men off the roads. ==Conclusion:== I have proven that Females and Gays are safer drivers overall than Straight males, therefore Straight males should be charged more. However, this is already in effect. I would also like to ask my opponent the Million Dollar question: Where do Bisexuals fall in this category?