The earth is a sphere

Firstly I would like to point out that pro is contradictory with his first two statements. First he points out that the earth is not actually a perfect sphere, but an oblong spheroid. Or pear shaped I believe. As this is not evident in the "photos" of earth as pro points out and provides as a true, not Photoshopped image of earth. This alone should be ample proof of something fishy, therefore discrediting NASA as a reliable source at the start. . https://youtu.be...However I will prove that at least one or more of NASA's photos are faked, and it will be assumed, given the circumstances, that all are faked as well. In this comparison, America has over doubled in size. Proof one. Blatant copying and pasting of cloud formations. Proof two. The word "sex" wrote out in cloud formations, really? Proof three. There are several proofs of NASA Photoshop, these are some of the worst, besides the fact that there are no satellites where there would be thousands, an actual photo of earth should look more like this: proof four. NaSA admits that most if not all of their "photos" of earth are in fact composites put together in Photoshop. proof fiveAs for a reason, there are a few theories, the most obvious would be if we weren't convinced, this is treasonous to the American tax payers because trillions have been spent on the name of space exploration. If we found out, this funding would cease, costing jobs etc. Some theories say that Satan himself is involved with references to The Great Deception. Instead of us being created for a purpose, unique in His image, we've turned into random, Godless creatures stuck in an insignificant corner of an endless universe. Everything has turned materialistic as we have lost our true purpose in life. Gravity. Ah gravity, that magical force that (without observation) causes things over an uncertain mass to make some things stuck to it, while others float around it in a circle. Not a single experiment in history, however, has shown an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause other smaller masses to be attracted to it as Newton claims "gravity" does with Earth, the Sun, Moon, Stars and Planets. What we can observe is that things of high density, when placed in a less dense medium will sink while less dense objects in a more sense medium rise. At what amount of mass do these magical things happen? It doesn't, it's a theory, and we're taking someone's word that it even exists. Kinda reminds me of some or most religions, telling us to believe something that can't be proven or observed in a real world environment. It's against the rules of this debate, therefore unusable. . http://beforeitsnews.com.... For more gravity shenanigans. Gyroscopes. If a gyroscope is affected by the spin of the earth, it would rotate 90" every 6 hours as does the earth, have you observed this? But wait that's not even taking into account the revolution around the sun, which in turn is revolving around the universe at 999 Brazilian miles per hour or whatever ball earthers claim. It would rotate wildly in every direction. It's not probable at all. "It appears to move" lol I like you! "Dipping distances"? Lighthouses have been recorded, which is easily researched, to have been seen from far further than what the ball-earthers' circumference of earth should allow. A few examples:The Port Nicholson Light in New Zealand is 420 feet above sea-level and visible from 35 miles away where it should be 220 feet below the horizon. The Eger" Light in Norway is 154 feet above high-water and visible from 28 statute miles where it should be 230 feet below the horizon. The Light at Madras, on the Esplanade, is 132 feet high and visible from 28 miles away, where it should be 250 feet below the line of sight. The Cordonan Light on the west coast of France is 207 feet high and visible from 31 miles away, where it should be 280 feet below the line of sight. The light at Cape Bonavista, Newfoundland is 150 feet above sea-level and visible at 35 miles, where it should be 491 feet below the line of sight. Stars. You don't see stars on the other side of the disc for the same reason you don't see the sun, it's just too far away, they blend in with the horizon. Aka law of perspective? Think of the railroad tracks going into the distance, the two tracks are the same distance from each other, but they appear to meet, this works on a vertical axis too. Just as the telephone poles get shorter and eventually disappear. It's funny you should mention stars though. Did you know you can see Polaris( a star that is directly over the north pole and doesn't move, not even while we are wobbling around in the "cosmos") from well past the equator, which would be impossible on a ball. All photos, or videos, 100% of the time, that show a curvature of any kind, are shot through a fish eye lens, which anyone can evaluate and prove. I'm sure I don't have to explain what a fish eye lens is. But in short, it'll curve any line. Until that line is centered, then it flattens, if the camera goes below the horizon past a certain point, the horizon appears to curve outward! Now we all know the earth is not concave, don't we? Or do we. .. This is the same reason the airplanes' windows are curved. Firstly, Earth is a “plane” not a “planet,” so the shape of these “planets” in the sky have no bearing on the shape of the Earth beneath our feet. Secondly, these “planets” have been known for thousands of years around the world as the “wandering stars” since they differ from the other fixed stars in their relative motions only. When looked at with an unprejudiced naked-eye or through a telescope, the fixed and wandering stars appear as luminous discs of light, NOT spherical terra firma. The pictures and videos shown by NASA of spherical terra firma planets are all clearly fake computer-generated images, and NOT photographs.