There is proof of evolution/no proof of creation

Evolution:1. A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form.I want my opponent to keep that definition in mind, thats the biology definition, since he mention of going to college 2 years on biology. first of all you can't "prove" a scientific theory. second of all there is NO scientific evidence that actually supports the theory of evolution.RE: Yes you can prove a scientific theory with hypothesis, testing, observing, that is the difference between science and creation, or this book. Science you can observe, test, prove, Religion only goes so far as of assumptions. I said this once, "you cannot go outside look up and see this god" but of course my opponent, will find an excuse on what I just said to disclaim it, but that is ok; we all know you can not see this god. When that happens you just assume he is real with no hard evidence, only a story that could also be made up, as you can see on allot of books that are sold today. With out that book, theist does not have nothing else used to prove of this creationism, other then hear say from a book, that is copied many, many, many, reworded allot. As for NO scienctific evidence my opponent stated, there is, I will get to that in a minute. I was an atheist for the first 25 years of my life. I attended secular schools up to and beyond 2nd year college and attended biology and anthropology classes in college. After further study for a number of years after school I became convinced that the theory of evolution is false, not scientific and based on assumptions, deceptions and misinterpretations of data. I believe that God created the earth and the heavens and that they were created "good" or perfect to begin with and have since been steadily decaying (the opposite of evolution). I believe the earth is about 6000 years old but could be as old as 20,000 years. RE: My opponent is confused; as he not seen this bible, he speaks of biology (study of living organisms, DNA, Etc..) tooken from college, as misinterpretations of data, assumptions, deceptions. Wonder if he truely reads this bible, based of true deception, obviouse misinterpretations of data, also true deception. The thing he does not realise taking these classes, he did not want to open his eyes to the truth, thats why he quickly disregard of its teaching. Let me say this, to my opponent, if he took biology in college, then he speaks of the earth only being 6,000 years old, but wait then he speaks of 20,000 years old. I know my opponent learned about Dinosaurs, once lived beyond 6,000 to 20,000 years old, DNA proves that, if you do not believe in DNA, then I feel sorry for you. about 6000 years ago God created everything. RE: Did you just tell us 20,000 years old; that basically you do not know. Let me remind you in your book 1 day is 1 day. If it was thousands, it would of said thousands, not one day. I believe that people accept the theory of evolution because they do not take the time to critically examine the so called evidence for themselves.RE: Most people accept evolution, because its more logical, more evidence, actually can be tested. The only thing creationist can do is say words from a book without testing, only using limited knowledge as far as the words read. ==========================================================================My Arguments:A) Evolution means evolving through time, taking something complex to change over a period of time. B) Knowing my opponents arguments on this subject, he will at the end of the last round use it to copy and paste, a book from this bible. Genises 1, 1-? about this creation belief, so I will take a spare moment to debunk that assumption, well we can call it the theory of creation. Like I said, it is words from a book, just like all the other books created during its time. I want to point out two different verses from two different versions of these bibles, both on the same religion christian beliefs of creation. Order of things "Made" in Genesis 1 Order of things "Formed" in Genesis 2 Vegetation (made first - 3rd day) Adam (formed first) Animals (made second - 5th and 6th day) Vegetation (formed second) Male (made third - 6th day) Animals (formed third) Female (made fourth - 6th day) Eve (formed fourth) Take a look at this table, I will give the link bottom of page; two different stories, from the same book, if this is true, if this book you say is true that would explain a point of Evolution in this book. Either the author who wrote this, found out his writings were wrong, or it was just part of this author story, what I can see this author was greatly confused, meaning he did not know. Therefor this god that is claim in this bible did not truely speak through this author. Remember this god in this book is perfect, so if this god is perfect he would not mess up any of these words. Another part of Evolution:I hope my opponent remembers what evolution means; make something complex to a perfect form, now what would be complex as we see today that is made totally different as time goes by? A: A Sperm and a Egg, (reproduction aka truely evolution) Image A: male sperm entering an female egg. Once the sperm inserts the egg this will begin evolution. This is taking something complex, takes 9 months; after the development, evolving, the process of evolution. The end of nine months you will get something like this. Image B: If our earth took the bible literally, how everything was created; Animals, Humans would look like the egg and the sperm with no evolving form or anything, just organisms. Plants would just be a seed. You have to go through evolution aka change, to become something. Without actual evidence beyond words, there is no way we came from just a spoken word. That is true logic I speak, from what we see, and how we can anaylize, and actual see this god has nothing to do with this creation, it is created by organisms (sperm and egg). Final 2nd Round Thought:In my 3rd round if given the room to write, I will explain further into detail; this Evolution process, how the organisms, come from a complex thing, then to a fetus, then a baby. What changes, what evolution forms, what is lost, and gain, not only that, how this can connect the dots towards proving evolution. I just did the basic anaylises, I then will go through explanation. Now knowing my opponent he will say this god did this, well let me debunk that, like I said we see visual proof of an egg and sperm, not this god. He will then quote verses from this bible, which shows that creatures came first then men according to this book. First he needs to show visual proof of this god before disclaiming what i said, for the only thing he can fall on is this book of words, obviously written by man. Then my opponent will try to manipulate or put text into play claiming I said them, or twist what I said up. Then I might get insulted. I will let my voters know, in my next round I will go more into detail, so please stay tune untill then, or keep your eye on this debate. I might just read what my opponent said, if it shows no evidence just assumptions of this creation, saying the same thing over and over I will just continue were I left off on this round in my next round. I want to thank my opponent for accepting this debate, and also thank the people for taking the time to read this debate, I apoligize for the spelling and grammer, we are all not perfect. To be continued->->Sources: http://www.ecclesia.org...http://www.redorbit.com...http://www.hongkiat.com... Note: If images does not show, just copy and paste link of image, or right click, then left click on open image in new tab.if that does not work, try clicking one of the sources I posted, they also hold the same image.