Hitler was one of, if not, the most evil being in history

First a quick line-by-line rebuttal before I roundly condemn CON's arguments:RebuttalR31) "In all fairness let's talk about evil being in history.And when I said about slavery being fun, I said that slaveowners thought it was fun to oppress others, but that's besides the point, thus making it more evil than Hitler."CON does not contest that Hitler condoned slavery during the Nazi regime. CON does not contest that Hitler's version of slavery was far more cruel, far more demeaning, and far more oppressive than any instance of slavery seen in all of human history.R32) For the rest, only one statement need be made to refute each and every example that CON has proffered:"William Pitt the Elder -- evil man who boasted about England's greatness and caused misery for those who tried to conquer. Wartime general during the French-Indian conflict, he raped Native women. Rape is worse than death."Compare to the Holocaust. The crimes committed pale in comparison to Hitler's."William Pitt the Younger -- his son, conquered Ireland, changed a relatively peaceful trading relationship with outright conquest"Compare to the Holocaust. The crimes committed pale in comparison to Hitler's."Abraham Lincoln -- led war against the Sioux"Compare to the Holocaust. The crimes committed pale in comparison to Hitler's."Al Gore Sr -- caused misery for many blacks with Jim Crow laws"Compare to the Holocaust. The crimes committed pale in comparison to Hitler's."Nathan Bedford Forrest -- founder of the Ku Klux Klan"Compare to the Holocaust. The crimes committed pale in comparison to Hitler's."Lyndon Johnson -- created welfare to destroy blacks "Compare to the Holocaust. The crimes committed pale in comparison to Hitler's. Closing CON's case has been irresponsible, insulting, and ill-informed. CON believes that slavery evolved from the lack of sunscreen. CON believes that 22 Inuit children separated from their families somehow compares to the over 6 million Jews that were gassed in Nazi concentration camps. CON believes that discriminating against tomboys somehow makes a society more evil than committing genocidal murder. I ask that conduct be taken into consideration against CON, as his arguments when compared to the atrocity that is the Holocaust denigrate the significance of this evil in the affairs of humanity. The only reasonable explanation for CON's line of argumentation is that he is trolling, and hard. This debate was not set up as a troll debate.CON has dropped nearly every concrete assertion I have made in this debate:1) CON does not contest that Nazi human experiments were far more grotesque, cruel, dehumanizing, and oppressive than anything seen in human history.2) CON does not contest that the Nazis condoned slavery, and because of the inevitable death and destruction that was the slave's future in Nazi society, their lives (and deaths) were far more tragic than anything ever seen in any instance of institutionalized slavery recorded in human history.3) CON does not contest that every case he has brought forth falls far short of the evils perpetrated during the Nazi regime.4) CON does not contest that Hitler was responsible for conceiving most, if not all of the evils perpetrated by the Nazis.5) CON does not contest that the violent death Hitler caused by instigating WWII was more than all of the violent death seen in the entire world from 1800-1900.Therefore:Hitler was one of, if not, the most evil being in history.Vote PRO. Thank you.(post-script): I would thank the audience for reading this debate, but I do not think anyone would benefit from CON's line of argumentation. I would instead ask that the audience demand an apology from CON for wasting everyone's time.