required beliefs for salvation, are unclear, for christians

I will run down the list. Most of Pro's contentions have been explained already in the preceding rounds, so I will be brief in my responses. "so is this son of God stuff another item on the list of things needed to be saved? or is that just a clarification of what you meant about knowledge of him?" The "Son of God stuff" is central to Christianity, as I explained in the preceding rounds (see again: John 8:24; Galatians 2:20). "Without believing in Christ as who he is, spiritual death is inevitable..." "what if you are new to the faith but believe the essentials like everything else we'll say?" By "essentials" if you mean all have sinned, Jesus is the only way to the Father, Jesus' death and resurrection, etc., then sure. "or even what if you are experienced in the faith but for some reason believe everything else but not that? in any case, you just added another requirement." Added? "and are you denying the bible? it says if you believe Jesus is Lord, and that he rose from the dead you will be saved con is trying to argue you also have to believe he is the son of God" The two are not separate. Faith in Jesus includes knowledge of who Jesus is, just as faith in "it's funny, to see this poster making his 'magical' list, as if he definitely know, while in another debate con is arguing different points acting the same way. they can't both be right."Can we peruse through the arguments con has made/is making in the debate you are supposedly referencing? Since no such debate is cited, Pro created an ambiguous straw man in an attempt to foward her position."it's not that drastic to rely on someone in faith, all it is and takes is faith. if you want to live forever, put your faith in him. it doesn't necessarily follow that he must be the son of God or that be a prerequisite for a beleif. i will grant most expereinced chrisitans could and would believe it, though. "Pro seems to be distracted. She repeated what I have stated in Round 1; She stated in round 3 "if you want to live forever, put your faith in him." I stated in round 1 "As I have said before, Pro asked me for what I believe are the required beliefs for salvation. To this, I answer with what is aforementioned: believe in Christ." She essentially agrees with me, thus affirming Con's position."now con is adding more requirements, savior, messiah. and he's adding son of God under this believe category when he just did it in the last category. again, what about that verse about beeliving in your heart and confessing with your lips? you add new material. or things like 'believe in the lord and u will be saved'."See preceding material."heck, look at most sinner's prayers on the internet, those praryers that are said to bring one to faith etc. most do not list everything con has mentioned."Although no such "sinner's prayer" is in the Bible, "sinner's prayers" operate with the knowledge of who Christ is and humanity's sinful state."while his list might be suffiicent to be saved it couldn't cover everyone..."Who does it fail to cover? How does it fail to cover who it fails to cover?"so, as it is, the requiements are still too vague or listy. too inclusive or restrictive etc."Seeing how Pro failed to prove anything with regards to salvation as ambiguous in any of the rounds, coupled with her shoveling of dead arguments, straw man's fallacy, and agreement with my conclusion in round 1, the resolution as displayed in the title of this debate is negated.