The Bible was inspired by God

I apologize for the rather small post for my last round, I was very busy and didn't have time to do my full research. For this round I will point some amazing facts the Bible gives. I suggest Pro cite sources for any more verses he brings in. This is a good job, not taking me at my word and asking for proof. But con also needs to listen to their own wisdom. In the last round they only cited two sources, which only had to do with us having faulty memories and people thinking the earth was round. Con made many other claims against mine but didn't cite any sources for them. If your going to call me out for lack of evidence, then I will have to call you out. This is why we use soap. We are given no source for this claim, and in fact many times soap adds germs to your hands. The only thing soap does (beside antibacterial soap, which doesn't even kill all types of germs) is loosen the bacteria on your hands so, running water will wash it away easier. Studies have found out that washing your hands with running water (as told to do in Lev. 15:13) is almost as effective at removing germs as washing with soap. Even those that you cited such as the Romans used basins and other forms of stationary water to wash with. Pythagoras (6th century B.C.) is generally credited with having first suggested a round Earth. The verse I cited was out of Isaiah, which is accepted as being written in the 8th century B.C., 200 years before Pythagoras had suggested this. So I wasn't factually incorrect with this passage, at this time they didn't think the earth was round. People saw that nothing held up the moon and sun, and furthermore, no one would have seen anything holding up the Earth. No evidence is given for this argument. It could have been just as plausible, actually more likely that they didn't notice this since for a while they thought the earth was held up by elephants or a man called Atlas. Pro is simply misreading the passage. Once again no evidence is provided. This is just con's opinion which has just as much credibility as mine. But to prove I'm right, in the King James Bible (which is what I'm proving in this debate) all references to God are capitalized. For some reason I don't see any capitalization on his work in my Bible. And all other copies are the same, which means it was on purpose. Paul Fergus, when talking about this verse, states in his book God and the Atheist, "It wasn"t until 150 years ago that it was definitely recorded that every person in the world has a unique fingerprint. This led Sir Edward Henry in 1901 to devise a workable classification system when appointed Assistant Commissioner of Police at Scotland Yard in London. The first British court conviction by fingerprints was obtained in 1902. The Bible tells us this amazing fact 3,500 years ago that God has put a seal on the hands of every man that can show crimes they have committed." Blood was considered one of the four fluids essential to life. But only blood is mentioned in this verse (Lev. 17:14). If this was just written by man, then like everyone else, they would have labeled all the fluids necessary for life and condemned people from eating them. Also, Leviticus was written about 1400 B.C., Hippocrates suggested the four fluids of life at the soonest 460 B.C. Nearly 1000 years after this verse was written! Considering that for the bible, the stories were passed down for hundreds of years before being written down, it makes far more sense to assume the story was indeed changed, unless evidence is provided otherwise. I will get into this in the next round. I ask Pro to cite his source. This is simply untrue, Neither I, (nor any historical sources, to my knowledge), have suggested that the church was concerned about the public reading the bible https://www.cedarville.edu... http://www.wayoflife.org... http://www.aloha.net... I found these sources after only a few minutes of research. Maybe you should do your research before you argue a point. Deut. 4 and Lev. 11 give lists of things the Israelites were allowed and were not allowed to eat. At first this doesn't seem like much, after all the Muslims aren't allowed to eat certain things too. But the things that the Israelites aren't allowed to eat are what can easily cause diseases, not just for religious reasons like Muslims Once again they had absolutely no way of knowing this. An example is the pig. If you don't cook pork right, then you have a high chance of getting very sick, which the Israelites were not able to properly cook pork. They didn't know that uncooked pork could make you sick. Another example is they weren't allowed to eat birds of prey. Things that eat carrion are bound to pick up diseases, and even if they don't get sick, there is still the chance that we will get it if we eat them. Still another is that they are only allowed to eat sea creatures that have fins and tails. Bottom feeders (who don't have fins or scales) would make you sick by eating them, because like the birds, they can transfer diseases. The Israelites couldn't possibly have known that these animals caused diseases and sickness. Eccl. 1:7, Isa. 55:10, Job 36:27-28 all mention the water cycle. This wasn't truly discovered until around 1580. This is once again way ahead of it's time. 2Samuel 22:16 mentions valleys are in the ocean. Job 28:25 says that air has weight. Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear Hebrews11:3. A more simple version of this verse is the things that we see today are made of things that we are not able to see or detect. This verse is referring to atoms, something that wasn't going to be discovered for hundreds of years later. I could give many more examples of scientific facts in the Bible, but due to the amount of characters and the time I have to cut it short. Many examples are given on this page http://www.eternal-productions.org... In conclusion the Bible is filled with scientific facts that nobody knew for centuries. As I close I ask again, have you ever read the Bible. Have you ever read for yourself this book that you are trying to disprove. http://www.theatlantic.com... http://www.medic8.com... https://books.google.com... https://books.google.com... http://thecenterforbiblicalstudies.org... http://www.ancient.eu...