Evolution should be taught in all schools, contrary to creation.

Well you're a charming one. I'm afraid this is a debate if you didn't know, I advise you to take a level of respect for your oponnent when debating. Strangely enough you seemed to have blindly ignored my last attempt to warn you, and have even managed to take it to a new level."He's basically saying history textbooks before the invention of the camera have no merit.". I never said anything of the sort. The historical accounts of christ have little to no credibilty on what they preach and were written over a millenia ago, where-as the holocaust happened fairly recently with mountains of hard evidence supporting it. The holocaust is a fact, whereas creation is a silly theory that could be easily contradicted.These people who claim to not believe in the holocaust sound quite familiar. They sound like the sort of people who have faith, or belief without reason or evidence.What about Washington crossing the Delaware with green men in the forest? I've tried to do a little bit of research on this as you failed to give any sources but I've failed to find any mention of green men. Now, either you're giving a false example or it's lost on the internet. But honestly, if you give me one piece of hard evidence for whichever god you believe in, I will willingly convert to it. But unfortunately, you have provided no evidence towards your claimsThe difference between your historical sources and for example, the historical sources that claim that the ancient egyptians existed is this: They are much more credible. Granted, not all of it is credible. But we have no reason to not believe that there were numerous egyptian emperors who commanded the construction of the pyramids; there is simply too much evidence. And yet there is no evidence and contradictions to the claim that the earth is 6000 years old, that there was a flood, and that god created everything. There are contradictions to what the bible preaches. It's not only a lack of evidence that debunks creation, it's countless contradictions. A teenager could easily contradict the earth being 6000 years old. But anyone would find it very difficult if not impossible and pointless to try and contradict the construction of the pyramids by the ancient egyptians. Actually, you have given little evidence supporting your claim that radiometric dating is as innacurate as 99.99913%, and I have contradicted your argument on this. I wont repeat the full argument but let me say: For what reason would scientists continue using radiometric dating if it was 99.99913% accurate? If by discrimination you mean excluding ignorant and false theories that do little to help the society or science in any way, then sure. But it's not; it's a state of neutrality. If they want to learn about these harmful theories and superstitions outside of a public school, then go ahead; but I ask that they be excluded from classrooms so that our society may advance without silly superstitions blocking the way. Although unrelated to the debate; I would personally prefer a word without religion. Again; he who claims something with no supporting evidence is showing a grand feat of ignorance and certainly arrogance, contrary to several religious apologists who say the same of atheists and non-believers. And as for your last phrase, I'm afraid you've either missed a large part of my arguments about using christianity as an example, or there are more profound causes for you ignoring them