I will not break a rule {NEW MEMBER TOURNAMENT FINALS}

Rules Broken (Con)I am sorry to say, but my opponent has already lost this debate, First off I'll address his claims and then advance my own,Rule 26: All rules made by the PRO must apply to both the PRO and CON,My opponent claims that I violate rule 1, Rules created hold power over all rules posted later, and no later rule can contradict an earlier rule, This comes from the idea that his rules 11, (12), and 13 only apply to me, thus it is impossible for him to uphold the rule, However, he seems to have forgotten his own foundation rules, Rule 9 explicitly states, "All rules (except FR) posted in a round are to only apply to the next round," From this we can conclude that my rule 26 only effects rules my opponent makes beginning in round 2, As rules 11, 12, and 13 were made in round 1, they do not have to follow rule 26,As for his argument about it being null and void because used the word "made," Made can be representative of the future tense in combination with passive voice, I,e, a great wonder will be made, We will default to my interpretation of made applying to the future because once again rule 9 states that all rules only apply in future rounds, Thus, it is more likely to be true that made is being used in the future tense than the past as it is nonsensical to impose a rule that is outdated once it comes into effect, Furthermore, if there was any confusion he could have clarified in the comments section before making this assertion, Don't let my opponent twist my words,Rule 27: The PRO may not make my rules apply to myself,My opponent's appeal claims that though enforcement of rule 1 I violate his rule 12, All of instructions/restrictions placed on PRO by CON must also be followed by CON,Luckily for me, I had already predicted this response, Dictionary,com defines instruction as [1], "the act or practice of instructing or teaching; education," To make sure there is no ambiguity, dictionary,com also defines what it means to instruct [2], "to furnish with knowledge, especially by a systematic method; teach; train; educate," Finally, dictionary,com defines restrictions [3], "something that restricts; a restrictive condition or regulation; limitation,"Restrict is defined by dictionary,com as [4], "to confine or keep within limits, as of space, action, choice, intensity, or quantity,"Now, as we can see my opponent's rule 12 only applies if my rules have instructive or restrictive intent, Neither do my rules teach nor limit my opponent, Thus, insofar as my rules follow this pattern they shall not be in violation of his rule 12,Rule 28: The PRO may not accuse me of breaking a rule that I did not break,My opponent claims that my rule 28 is in violation of foundation rule 7, This accusation is made on the basis of the clause stating, "Each player should have an opportunity to not break each rule, and an opportunity to discuss rule-breakage," It is very clear that I am not preventing my opponent from discussion rule-breakage, Insofar as rule-breakage has occurred, he may talk about it, If there is no rule-breakage, then it cannot be discussed,,, because quite frankly in such a case there would not be any rule-breakage,Finally my opponent says that he "couldn’t point out a rule-breakage without accusing [me], even if [I] didn’t break it," I would like to say that 1, If I did not break a rule then there is no rule-breakage to point out, and 2, If I did break a rule, then my Rule 2 allows him to accuse me of it,Rules Broken (Pro)Rule 28: The PRO may not accuse me of breaking a rule that I did not break,Rule 9 states that all rules come into effect in the following round, Thus in round 2 my opponent was required to follow rule 28, My opponent accused me of breaking 3 separate rules, I've quite evidently shown that I am not in violation on any account, Insofar as this is true, the PRO has accused me of breaking 3 rules that I did not break, Thus, I win,Rule 11: All of CON's rules should be completed with the letter 'J', with different words ending in 'J' being used at the end of the sentence of the rule,This clearly violates rule 7's clause stating, "Each player should have an opportunity to not break each rule," It is impossible for me to coherently perform this task, According to WordByLetter,com [5], only 8 words in the English language end in J; and of these words, 1 is an abbreviation which does not end in J when spelled in full, 2 are alternative spellings of each other, and 4 do not have definitions, This leaves me with 2 applicable words, A requirement from my opponent was to use different words ending in J to complete every rule, I have more than 2 rules that must be made, Fulfilling his rule 11 is an impossible burden,In fact, words that end with J are removed from the English language, According to krysstal,com the word orange [6], "came into English where the fruit was a NARANJ, Words ending in J are not common in English so the spelling quickly changed to a NARANGE,"Rule 13: CON must use a comma instead of a full stop at the end of every sentence he makes,Rule 13 requires me to end every sentence with a comma, This rule is impossible for me to uphold, and is thus in direct violation of rule 7, because sentences cannot end with commas, Hunter College explains [7], "A sentence needs a period, a question mark, or an exclamation point at the end," Clearly commas do not end sentences,Additional Rules28, The PRO must use 7 Js, 12 Is, 2 As, 1 P, the word "cat" one time, the word "batman" two times, the word "word" one time, the phrase "I love you" 77 times, 1 quote from David Hume, 1 reference to the Bible, 1 picture of a drowning baby, 1 graph, 3 pie references, 1 pi reference, 2 Qs, 100 Ys, 72 Ks, 1 reference to the KKK, 1 quote from former president George Washington, the name of 3 pokemon (all from different regions), two entire songs (all lyrics included), 1 drawing of a fish, 4 mottos, 3 slogans, 3 rhymes, 1 kite reference, 3 waterfall names, the name of a planet outside of the milky way galaxy, provide proof for the existence of aliens, provide proof that global warming does not exist, cite 3 news articles about chinese agriculture published within the past 2 months in each rule, The PRO may use any number of items that I did not specify on the list; however, he may not use anything specified more or less than the amount of times specified,29, Each rule created by the PRO must be no more and no less than 2631 characters long, and are to be written in both iambic pentameter and old english, utilizing perfect grammar,30, The PRO may not impose rules that require me to perform multiple tasks, Sources1. http://dictionary.reference.com...2. http://dictionary.reference.com...3. http://dictionary.reference.com...4. http://dictionary.reference.com...5. http://www.wordbyletter.com...6. http://www.krysstal.com...7. http://rwc.hunter.cuny.edu...