Cyber bullying isn't really that big of an issue

Hello there, today I believe we have some MAJOR points to go over. I also would ask of my opponent to please extend this argument to 5 rounds because I feel like there would still need to be even more points I would have to go over with you. With that said, lets us being. I also will be countering some of your arguments in the comment section as well. -"My opponent in the comments has numerous times bemoaned my calls to vote for conduct in favor of me. As such, I want to make it clear for the record that I leave the conduct point up to voter discretion like it always has been on this website. So I do not wish to force voters to vote a certain way" Well there are reasons that I have bemoaned you of your calls for conduct. But for the sake of word space, I'll just post it in the comment section. -"The first thing I would like to address is my opponent's lack of sources. Because we are now in the second to last round of debate and my opponent's next argument is in the final round, I would question why my opponent has not given a single source the whole debate? Is it because my opponent does not want to look up facts? I am not sure but I wish for the voters to keep this in mind. " You want to know why I didn't really put many resources. It's because I myself have experienced cyber bullying. Experience is like your own source of resources. I used experience combined with logic to come up with my answer. I am now going to come up with a scenario on how you act and on how I act. Little Jimmy and his friend Ben were walking down the street when suddenly they found a dead bird lying out on the middle of the street. The two rushed over to the bird. They saw claw marks on the bird. Now little Jimmy remembered a time when he got scratched by a little cat. The scratch marks look exactly as the same as he remembered it on him in comparison to the bird. "Hey Ben, I think this cat got killed by a stray cat. " "But Jimmy, there's no proof what so ever that it did. It could've been killed by a car for all we know. " "Yah but Ben. .. " "Jimmy there"s no exact recording that he did they from a cat. " "BUT THEY LITERALLY LOOK LIKE STRATCH MARKS FROM A CAT. I BET YOU COULD EVEN FIND A ANIMAL EXPERT AND HE WOULD SAY THE SAME. " "There's still no 100% proof that the bird did die from a cat though. " That's basically how you acted, with no logic what so ever. I haven't seen one time that you actually have showed logic for that matter either. And wouldn't you agree that logic is also important as well? -I myself also want to add that me or any of my friends have actually seen someone get really down in the dumps because of cyber bullying. Nor have my parents or even my older brother and his friends have. I also want to know if YOU have ever seen someone affected by cyber bullying but I also want you to say how old they are and if they have a disability or if they have very soft emotions. -Me:"There are VERY FEW people who honestly have the "mental ability" to be not able to withstand the harassment of bullies. " you":You can say this, but without evidence, you cannot prove it. I provided evidence that many people in the UK cannot even cope with cyberbullies, so I have a source. " Ok already gone over the logic and experience thing. Also, I never once saw you even mention the UK. I scrolled through the previous debates of yours and never once saw you mention the UK. Once again, the con is providing us with false information. -"Once again no sources. Not only that, but not all Cyberbully victims are in the 8-9 range. Adults are cyberbullied as well. So are you discriminating? Also it is not my opponent's call to be determining the age at which social media is appropriate" I know that not all victims of cyber bullying are not 8-9 years old. I should've said MOST victims are 8-9 years old or just little kids in general. People with disabilities(autism) and very soft emotions are pretty much it for the adults and teenagers. "Also it is not my opponent's call to be determining the age at which social media is appropriate" Your right it's not my call, BECAUSE THE CALL HAS ALREADY BEEN MADE. People everywhere agree that little children shouldn't use the internet. I'm pretty sure either the con is unaware of that fact or chose not to mention it because his argument would be pretty useless if he did. -"But in some cases, magical logic requires facts to support assumptions and presumptions made in the logic. Without those facts, the point is illogical. " Again, this is where experience plays a role plus common knowledge as well. I have already repeated in my previous arguments why people have gotten used to cyber bullying. Remember the environment example? -I just wanted to point out that other than the fact that the con says I don't have enough evidence to support my claims, it doesn't seem he really is putting up much of an argument for this round. For the most part that is. -"Jing Wang, Tonja Nansel and Ronald Iannotti of the NIH's National Institute of Child Health and Human Development analyzed data from an international survey from 2005/2006 that included 4,500 U. S. preteens and teens. They were asked specifically about feelings of depression, irritability, grouchiness and ability to concentrate, and also asked specifically if they had been hit, called names, shunned or sent negative messages via computer or cell phone -- or done any of these things to other people. " But the con didn't say what the results where. All he said was that the a certain sector of the health department asked kids about how they were feeling via computer or cell phone. The results could've been "Oh yah it's not a problem what so ever. " But the con doesn't provide any more information. I would also like to add that this survey was done in 2005/2006. Back them social media wasn't a very popular thing and there weren't many cyber bullies. But eventually people learned to adapt against cyber bullying in order to over come it. Remember the environment thing again? -" Unlike traditional bullying which usually involves a face-to-face confrontation, cyber victims may not see or identify their harasser. " I actually think of this as a good thing because in traditional bullying, you can actually both emotionally and physically injured. Both you can't get physically injured in cyber bullying. Plus, in traditional bullying, you actually know who's bullying you, making the bullying have more of an effect. But in cyber bullying, you don't know who's bullying you, making it have less of an effect. This is because the bully can have more of an effect on your personal life than a cyber bully ever could. -"As such, cyber victims may be more likely to feel isolated, dehumanized or helpless at the time of the attack. " Now I think we can both agree that report abuse doesn't work. BUT you can tell your local police about it since they can actually track were you live via IP address. -"Physical and verbal bullies are often depressed themselves. But while there was little difference in depression between physical bullies and their targets, the NIH team found that cyber-bully victims reported significantly higher levels of depression than frequent bullies. " I fail to see how this honestly is supposed to prove your point more. -I also just want to add that if you really think that my information has no real evidence, then you can literally just search my information on the internet. Thus you can actually still see the evidence yourself. Voters can do this as well. -Me:"First of all, hundreds and thousands of gamers play CS:GO. So your saying that hundreds of thousands of people need to get a life? YOU CYBER BULLY ;)" - you:"Uh poor conduct alert? Also why the wink? Why am I suddenly a Cyberbully? You discriminated on the ages of cyberbullied victims, which is worse than me discriminating CS:GO players who willingly choose to be jerks in that game. So I fail to see how I am the Cyberbully. Also if you have played CS:GO before, then wouldn't that mean you talk with Cyberbullies all the time? So doesn't that make you in league with Cyberbullies? There are just too many things wrong with this statement by Pro. " Wow dude seriously chill out. There's a reason why I put a winky face on that statement. It was because it was meant to be taken as a joke. Also I want you to read another response you yourself wrote in the comment section. -"To this my response Natsu is F*CK OFF. I am getting sick of your attitude. " Uh poor conduct alert? -"Terrific! Sources from my opponent! Unfortunately each video has no synopsis so you expect us to watch all the videos? I don't have time for that. So why should these sources be considered higher than my quoted ones? " I'm pretty sure a synopsis doesn't really matter in this situation as long as you prove the point. Also once again the con is counter arguing the most useless thinks so that it could appear to the voters that he has convincing arguments. Unfortunately, the amount of words I can put into this debate is almost depleted so after I post this debate. I'll be immediately right after that post my other points in the comment section. So make sure to watch out for those.