I Will Not Contradict Myself

1. Inanimate Life and the Earth But places are inanimate objects too. Inanimate objects are defined as "Not having the qualities associated with active, living organisms. "[1] Places do not have the qualities associated with active, living organisms (i. e. they can not move, eat, talk, or think). Therefore, places are inanimate objects, and you said inanimate objects cannt hold emotions, but you said the Earth as a place is sad. 2. Income Taxes and Constitutionality If you support the idea of an income tax, then you must support a bill before Congress to legislate it. It would be a contradiction within itself if you supported a bill but did not support its passing. And the income tax is unconstitutional. "On May 21, 1895, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that a direct tax on personal income was unconstitutional. .. ""The Supreme Court's decision was based on the premise that "Congress cannot impose a duty or tax upon personal property, or upon income arising either from rents of real estate or from personal property, including invested personal property, bonds, stocks, and investments of all kinds, except by apportioning the sum to be so raised among the States according to population, it practically decides that, without an amendment of the Constitution — two-thirds of both Houses of Congress and three-fourths of the States concurring — such property and incomes can never be made to contribute to the support of the national government. ""Wikipedia's summary of the 16th Amendment states that all arguments against its proper ratification, which allegedly occurred in 1913, and constitutionality have been "rejected in every court case where they have been raised and have been identified as legally frivolous. " Can a law declared unconstitutional in 1895 be constitutional in 1913 and beyond? ""Mr. Bill Benson reported that he scrutinized the documents in the possession of various state legislatures and that the 16th Amendment had not been ratified by the required 36 states to have been enacted. "[2] By the way, my source is reliable. Also, [3] "the failure of thirteen [states] to ratify". It is uncomstitutional 3. Ron Paul, Obama, and Upholding the Constitution "The mandate represents an unprecedented assertion of federal power. "[4] "See where it says in Clause 1, "To lay and collect Taxes"? The Lawless Five assert that this phrase authorizes Congress to lay & collect taxes for any purposes whatsoever. They IGNORED the "specification of the objects [Clauses 3-16] alluded to by these general terms" [Clauses 1 & 2] – the "enumeration of particulars" which "explain and qualify" "the general phrase". In effect, they repealed Clauses 3-16. In a nutshell, the Lawless Five asserted that Congress and the President may do whatever they want to us. Just call it a "tax". ""Article I, ï¿½8, clauses 1-16 [READ]"[5] so, Obamacare is unconstitutional. We simply had a majority of very bad, totalitarian judges who didn't even bother to read the Constitution. "In taking the country into a war with Libya, Barack Obama's administration is breaking new ground in its construction of an imperial presidency -- an executive who increasingly acts independently of Congress at home and abroad. Obtaining a U. N. Security Council resolution has legitimated U. S. bombing raids under international law. But the U. N. Charter is not a substitute for the U. S. Constitution, which gives Congress, not the president, the power "to declare war. "[6] "Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution reads: "Congress shall have power to … declare War. " Congress did not declare war on Libya. The globalist sock puppet Obama did. "[7] Obama's airstrike is unconstitutional. And, if you like constitutional policies, why do you support unconstitutional presidents but oppose constitutional presidents? That in itself is a contradiction. 4. Foreign Aid and Constitutionality "Just to make sure this principle was legally codified, the Tenth Amendment was included: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. " There is no authorization to pay for spying in Mexico. There is no authorization to prop up dictators in places like Pakistan with your money. There is no authorization to spend your money on "military assistance" for other countries. There is no authorization to funnel money through the CIA to support regime changes. The Constitution was written in plain English – there is nothing there which authorizes the federal government to take your money and give it to foreign governments. For any reason. "[8] Foreign aid is unconstitutional. 5. Military Conflict and Assistance Well, there is no other way to help those people in those places. You can't help people there without war. If you support helping people, you must support the wars. 6. China and the US My opponent pratically contradicted himself, when he was attempting to defend himself. He earlier stated that the US and China are hostile towards each other. He just stated that the US and China are NOT hostile towards each other. The fact that he admitted earlier that they were hostile, fits the definition of an "enemy". Hence, according to Pro, China is an enemy, but he answered the question "Is China an enemy" with a No. 7. The Right to Life, Sacred Life, and Abortion This is one big contradiction itself. If life begins at conception, than abortion is murder. Even if the lifemof a fetus is not as importantas the life of a human, this only matters if the woman's life is in danger, which you still support abortions if she is not. Life is more important than rights. And you support helping people in need. Life begins at conception, so you must help fetuses by being pro-life. 8. Cruel and Unusual Punishment and Abortion "Abortion is plain infanticide, a crime against nature. Unless life is threatened, the human specie should be allowed to continue, and if need be put up for adoption instead of aborting. "[9] So yes, abortion is cruel and unusual punishment, and you are against that and think life begins at conception. 9. The Minimum Wage and Constitutionality "The argument focuses on the Tenth Amendment, which provides that "[t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. " Although Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power "to regulate commerce…among the several states", it does not contain a clause expressly authorizing Congress to prescribe a federal minimum wage. Thus, opponents argue that because the Constitution does not expressly give Congress the power to set a minimum wage, that power is reserved to the states. "[10] The minimum wage is unconstitutional. 10. Contradiction on Contradictions You have made 10 contradictions, yet you rejected (am not aware, i. e. you don't see one) that you made a contradiction. This is a contradiction. You have been found to be contradictory. I win. Vote con. Thank you. Sources: [1]: . http://www.thefreedictionary.com... [2]: . http://politicalvelcraft.org... [3]: . http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com... [4]: . http://www.hoover.org... [5]: . http://www.toberight.com... [6]: . http://www.foreignpolicy.com... [7]: . http://www.infowars.com... [8]: . http://tenthamendmentcenter.com... [9]: . http://townshipnews.org... [10]: . http://m.dinsmore.com...