Morality cannot logically exist without God

1. ) Lack of Clarification Pro's folly lies in not clarifying which god he/ and or she (from this point on, I will refer to pro as a he, for convenience) is speaking of. From the different standards among the many theistic religions, there is no set of objective morality that is common among all theistic religions, and among people that believe in a God/ Gods. To clarity, here is a definition of "moral" from dictionary. com: Adjective: Of, relating to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical:moral attitudes. . http://dictionary.reference.com... I will argue that there is no objective morality among the Christian faith itself (As according to Pro's profile, at the time I checked it, his religion is that of Christianity), but first I have some questions for pro. He claims that God provides an unchanging moral standard. I ask him, does he consider the crusades moral (which were done in the name of god, and god provided no direct intervention, as is apparent by historic records)? , or the Spanish Inquisition moral? What of the abuse of Children in the Catholic Church among "men of god". And to quote from the Bible itself: 1. )"If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. If a man lies with his father's wife, he has uncovered his father's nakedness; both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. If a man lies with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death; they have committed perversion; their blood is upon them. If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. If a man takes a woman and her mother also, it is depravity; he and they shall be burned with fire, that there may be no depravity among you. . ." Leviticus 20:10:16 . http://www.openbible.info... I ask Pro to comment on whether this passage is moral. I ask him to comment on whether he thinks adulterers and homosexuals should be put to death. If he says "yes", by my moral standards, he lack morals. If he reply's "no", than he is going against the word of God itself, and thus going against the moral standards God set forth. And please don't say "this is taken out of context". It is actually quite specific in the conditions and the ways to put people to death. 1. )"You shall have no other gods before Me. " - 1st Commandment . http://lifehopeandtruth.com... I question how this itself could be considered morality, as there are numerous other religions existing, all that believe that there exists different God/s. The 10 Commandments are meant to set guidelines for humanity, yet many theistic people (Christians included) don't follow them to the word. In conclusion, I have disproved Pro's statement "Morality cannot logically exist without God". He never specifies which god. And I also showed that, among Pro's faith itself, there occurred and is many immorality that Christians themselves would look down upon, but which were done in the name of God, and in which God apparently had no direct intervention (again, as is apparent by historical records). If Pro argues there was direct intervention, he must provide proof, as the burden of proof will lie on him. I than showed a passage (in which one is enough, if it is the word of god) that would seem very immoral in our present, first world, 21st century standards. The passage from Leviticus I mentioned, many Christians themselves disagree with that statement. Thus, I have shown, that even with God, there is no objective morality.