God is omnipotent

Omnipotent- 1 (of a deity) having unlimited power; able to do anything. 1.1 Having ultimate power and influence. 'an omnipotent sovereign' Source: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com... As Canis wrote in the comments, one must first identify something before calling it omnipotent. The reason for is to bypass all those paradoxes that Con could say in his arguments. I am not saying those paradoxes don't exist(even though technically speaking, a paradox is always where the "rational road" ends), I am calling "God" omnipotent after I have identified him(Jesus), thus "God" cannot inherently be more than Himself. Oxford dictionary included that "1.1" definition for this exact reason. An example phrase was given to express the inherent contradiction of omnipotence. 'An omnipotent sovereign'. When one describes something as omnipotent, one is ultimately always putting a definable limit of that "something". The sovereign cannot do any of those paradoxes conceptually associated with omnipotence, but still can be defined as omnipotence. In my opinion, God cannot exist beyond God. Thus God is always limited to what He can become but still can be omnipotent. I realized that I have given the choice between Time Travel and continuance, but based on our understanding of wormholes, I would put forth that Time Travel would be invented. The reason why it's theorized only future Time Travel is possible is because of the inherent paradoxes of backward Time Travel. Again to bypass the paradoxes, the only possible solution to if backward Time Travel exists is to accept that it has already happened without it being observed. The only way that could have happened is through actions that cause unlikely circumstances to occur. Those are known as miracles. The best way to identify who I am is a "natural philosopher". I only put it like that because what I'm about to say can only be understood through natural philosophy rather than modern physics. Please check out this 5 min video I made. It explains(poorly I know) what I am calling Differential Perspective which is necessary to apply logic and reason to all we know about physics. https://youtu.be... Please like :) Now I will try to explain it better. Imagine Time is a river with a constant current(the very cool thing about this is that I can explain 'why' relativity happens). Now imagine space and matter as a Two-dimensional plane(object) in that river. As it moves along that river, it continues to grow(representing expansion of the universe). Now if you look a bit smaller and examine the galaxies, you can see them all be in 2 dimensions in a sense. The reason being is the dimension of time is pressuring space and matter into a 2-dimensional plane. Now some galaxies are moving faster than others. Why is that? Well if you take this Differential Perspective, and if the galaxy rotates to be flat against the current, then hypothetically it would go faster just like how a sail boat works with the wind. Oh yes, this explains why galaxies are moving faster after the initial explosion of the Big Bang. In addition to understanding, it opens the possibility for perceiving the 5th dimension that Time does not exist. I believe electrons and other subatomic particles exist there. But there still in the river where the constant of the proton still reacts to them. So as the proton moves through the river it collects some baggage(the electron) and the atom is formed. Now this explains all properties of the electron(as well as the other sub-atomic particle) because they do not exist in Time like the proton does, but still is able to react to the proton(and neutron). This Differential Perspective rationalizes Quantum Mechanics even with Quantum Entanglement(now to try prove Einstein right). Quantum Entanglement is basically identifying two sub-atomic particles acting in accordance with one another. Looking at them from Differential Perspective, I hypothesize that it's actually the exact same sub-atomic particle acting the opposites way in two different places. It exists out of time, thus distance and objects are irrelevant. I also think this is the essence of magnetism. The electron that acts opposite of itself naturally "wants to be as close as it can to itself in the the same place". This would confirm Einstein was right all along in which Quantum Mechanics was not completed yet. The reality of this theory explains this universe. There doesn't need to be multiple universes. Differential Perspective can explain everything in one universe, so by the logic of Occam's Razor, it's not a theory(It's actually logic, point effect). String theory is a theory. The Big Bang is a theory. But this is looking at the universe to how we are actually supposed to be looking at it. Relativity: The current of Time is skewed by space and matter. The current pushing the object is always inherently slower than the current around the object. The Theory of Relativity is the result of such an interaction. All of this being said is to attribute to the omnipotence of God. Whoever invents backward Time Travel, in my opinion, will be God. That entity can be created in the future, then go back to 1. put a neutron into nothing, starting the chain reaction of the Big Bang 2. Put DNA into the primordial ooze to start life (Oh yes, Intelligent Design)3. Do all those miracles in the Bible to make sure they're witnessed and 4. To make sure everything else is supposed to happen the way it happens. Such an entity requires autonomy(call it omnipotence) and for His perspective to be the Truth. Here's the reason why for that. If you don't want to watch that video(even though it's a lot better than mine), then to sum up the problem is that because we observe things at different times(watch about the first two minutes of it to explain it better), there needs to be one observer to maintain the nature of fact. Time will always be dependent on this one particular observer. That observer is God. Now Con has interestingly enough brought up an immoral perspective of God which I will address in the final debate. But I wish to clarify a few things. 1. a creator of the universe. - God puts the neutron in nothing thus creating the universe 2. a ruler of the universe. - God invented/discovered Time Travel which gives Him power to cultivate the entire universe as He sees fit. (sounds like a ruler to me) 3. a source of ALL moral authority. - God can do whatever He wants so He can dictate morality(That sounds like Moral Authority to me) But I will address those moral objections in my next argument 4. an entity, god, who satisfies all 3. - A man becomes God (in Christianity that's Jesus) 5. this god that is also unlimited in the quantity of powers. - He can do anything a human is capable of achieving and more. 6. this god that is also unlimited in the extent of powers. - He can do anything non-paradoxical through science. I wish also to say that even though this technically not true because the science community has not accepted this yet, Con still must prove this Differential Perspective to be wrong in order for Atheism still be considered a fact. A fact by definition is something that can't be proven wrong. The hilarious thing about all of this is that I'm not even trying to prove the existence of God even though that's what this debate is about. I have given a "theory" that undermines the factual nature of Atheism. I don't know if this is going to be enough to win this debate, but like I said, I hope at least at the end of the debate that we begin to see that Atheism is no longer a fact. Oh yeah, if you would take the Differential Perspective of the 5th dimension to be a river, then Time would be a flat circle in it. Perspective is relative. It's important to keep it relative to understand how the Nature of The Universe works. Thank You, Con for this debate.