Snopes.com is a liberal agenda machine.

Let's see if I can make this make sense for you. "The evidence is in the photos. The most clear photo shows an abstract pattern. As seen below." This is not an abstract pattern. In Arabic, "al" is an article or a word for "the", so al-Lah means "the God". In Arabic, the name "Allah" is composed of four letters, Alif Lam Lam Ha, read from right to left, which when brought together make the serpent-like symbol you see on the picture. * Allah picture link- http://sufi-mystic.net... * Picture it like this to understand. If you wrote the word "God" on a piece of paper, you could write it many ways in English. Yes? You could write it in block letters, slanted letters, or cursive, but any English reading person would still recognize the word nevertheless. Yes? * Here is a link that shows an abstract version to be seen that it looks a bit different but is the same thing. http://www.redbubble.com... It's like if you saw a swastika. You would know what it is even if drawn in a different form. You don't need someone to explain it to you do you? No, you do not. * Snopes" main political "fact-checker" is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that strangely enough, is well known for publishing"fake quotes"and even"full fledged hoaxes. While at Inquisitr, the future "fact-checker""consistently displayed clear"partisanship to liberalism. She described herself as "openly left-leaning" and a liberal. She called the"Tea Party "teahadists." She called Bill Clinton "one of our greatest" presidents". The Bill that was accused of rape like a mantra and got impeached? She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham"s comparison of voting to sex because they "fear female agency." She one time wrote: "Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth, or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty." (An easy fact-check would demonstrate that food stamp fraud really does occur in real life and costs taxpayers tens of millions of dollars.) Lacapria also accused the Bush administration of being "at least guilty of criminal negligience" in the September 11 attacks. The future "fact-checker" presented no evidence to support her claim. After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined"Snopes, where she"often goes to the defense for other liberals. She wrote a "fact check" article about Jimmy Carter"s unilateral ban of Iranian nationals from entering the U.S. that appeared more like an opinion column"debating against Donald Trump"s proposed ban on Muslims. Lacapria in yet another "fact check" article argued Hillary Clinton hadn"t included Benghazi at all in her bs "we didn"t lose a single person in Libya" gaffe. Lacapria pushed that Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011 invasion of Libya, but not the 2012 Benghazi attack, yet she gave little factual evidence to support the claim. After the Orlando terror attack, Lacapria pushed that just because Omar Mateen was a registered Democrat with a real life active voter registration status did not mean he was actually a Democrat. What? Her "fact check" said that he might "have chosen a random political affiliation when he initially registered." Really? Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as "rumors." Think about it Con. We know it's a fact. We know it is. They admitted it. In that "fact check" article, Lacapria argued that "Facebook Trending"s blacklisting of "junk topics" was not only not a scandalous development, but to be expected following the social network"s crackdown on fake news sites." The opinionated article was so named "The Algorithm Is Gonna Get You." Lacapria also gave defense for Clinton in a fact check article when she said, "Outrage over an expensive Armani jacket worn by Hillary Clinton was peppered with inaccurate details." One of the "inaccurate details' given by Lacapria was, "The cost of men"s suits worn by fellow politicians didn"t appear in the article for contrast." She also said that the speech Clinton gave while wearing the $12,000 jacket, which talked about "raising wages and reducing inequality," wasn"t really about income inequality. http://www.snopes.com... http://www.frontpagemag.com... http://mynewsla.com... https://heatst.com... http://thepekoegroup.com...