The Proof of the non-existence of God

A Fool credit:The Fool says: Firstly, let’s give credit where credit is due, he is right, I have been fooling myself. But have I been fooled again? Oh what now, problems I say, problems. For let’s take a closer look at my argument and see if it can be salvaged or if I have to come up with a new one. But I was sure I had previously thought out a necessary condition. Maybe I was just wrong from the beginning. :( The fool says: But wait a minute I do have an informal proof and a mathematical proof, and if that is true. I must have made a wrong turn with the logical proof. So let’s try a more careful approach this time. I am running out of chances here. :( The art of schooleryA Fools clarification:Part 1This segment was to clarify what we all know about truth for sure. That is, we may disagree on many things but one thing for sure is that the truth is the truth. Why because If it is something else then it would be false. Which is just a tautology:P1. Truth=Truth=1And this is the proof of the law of non-contradiction. That is, a contradiction can’t be true, because it would break the law of tautology which is a law of truth. Therefore what is not is false. Further clarification can be show by looking at the presupposition of the expression “is not”. That is, it is the case that it is not the case, which we see is inherently a contradiction. Therefore:P2. What “is not” =falseEven that is tricky because technically it doesn’t exist. That is the property of not-ness(really a lack of any property) So in this sense it is and illusion. Why, because an illusion appears as something, but it is really nothing. Not-ness analytically doesn’t exist, because it’s not there. See its all the same idea. ExtP2 false= does not exist=no-thing=contradiction=0=illusionPart 2Idea versus physical symbols:The function of language is to communicate our ideas with other people. To master Foolery, it is a very important skill of to be able to tell the difference. For example there is a mental image of a tree and the physical symbol “tree” we use to communicate this idea. But what is important here is the mental concept of Truth and false. That is the mental concept true is the same as the mental concept of 1 and mental concept false is the same as the mental concept of 0. Why, because every particular or whole thing is 1 thing. For example:Is if we substitute 1 in a sentence for other words that refer to the same idea as one it will not change the meaning of the sentence(the meaning is in your mind) E.g. a bright star exist in a sky. 1 bright star 1 in 1 sky. It is an unintuitive read because we need some multiplication symbols to smooth it out, but the meaning is the same.The multiplication symbol asserts a property to something. For example; with numbers it asserts a property of quantity. In this case it can assert a quality.For example “a car is red.”=“a car*red” In both cases we have “1red car” Now we can fully realize P1 and P2P1. True=1=existence=truth=is=a=the=anP2. False= does not exist=no-thing=contradiction=0=illusion=is notI am sure this is not an exhaustive list.Now let’s see if we got enough knowledge to take on this Sophist. Remember if we fail, it’s all hellfire and brimstone for eternity. The fool says: that doesn’t sound very fun. :(Exit Schoolery/enter Foolery. The Fool says: That was weird it was like I was a sleep for a moment. Oh yeah, the argument.Argument 1 (informal proof) If faith is a condition of the truth of its content, in this case God. It follows that faith makes anything true. Therefore anything we have faith in is as true as god. That is Leprechauns, devils, and even foolish ideas. ;) That is, faith cannot distinguish between the existences of anything in particular. The inability to distinguish is ignorance. Thus the only existence that follows from faith is ignorance. Argument 2 (mathematical proof)For let’s grant the Sophist faith alone is good enough for the truth of something (I don’t think we even need to say god, because faith alone just fails as a criteria of truth). This is because it also becomes equally true that the existence of depends on belief alone. Thus if the truth of god is as true as the truth of the non-existence of god, that is, god is not. Then he can't exist. (Warning this is not to be confused with mental concepts(thoughts). e.g. we all have a mental conception of a leprechauns and gods but that doesn't mean we believe in god or leprechauns.)P1&P2 (the fool’s special weapon)For let x represent god;(1*x) –(1*x)=0 Therefore 1x – 1x = 0Argument 3 (Logical Proof): Here is another clearer formulation: for let F=faith let G=god let E= existenceGiven:1. G→FThe existence of god is faith based.2. F→EGIf something is faith based then it does exist.3. F→~EGBut if something is faith based then it also does not exist. 4. G→(EG&~EG)Therefore the existence of a faith based god is False.A faith based god’s existence is a contradiction. That is IMPOSSIBLE. Thus a faith based god does not exist. QEDEnd of round 3 For the Fool with the chills. The Fool says: mind ma English it is not my third language.