The motorways should be cleansed of lane-hogging scum

I thank Mr. Eggleston for this debate. This is something that I personally am very much in favor for. slow driver is a b1tch, especially when there is like a mile of open road in front of her. I note that as pro/instigator, Mr. Eggleston has the bop to sufficiently justify his reason why motorways should be cleansed of these "lane-hogging scums". It suffices as COn victory if he can effectively prove that no good will come of Pro's stance. I would like to contest Pro's definition of a lane-hogging scum. In America, a lane-hogging scum is more stereotypically referred to as "that baggy, seventy-year-old asian woman driving a white dented Hyundai Sonata." There, it seems, is a negative correlation between a driver's ethnicity being Asian and driving skill. For proof, I refer the readers to the link below http://seoulsuckingjerk.com... Also, for reasons of organization, we will define them as comprising a stratum of D0uchebaggery. Pro's plan to convert speed cameras to discipline-enforcement camera will backfire. Following are the reasonings: Disadvantage 1: Extinction of Lane-hoggers lead to Instability in Ecosystem Pro proposes that speed cameras be converted into lane discipline-enforcement cameras. But the fact of the matter is, lane-hogging scums take up an important niche in our ecosystem. You see, in every ecosystem, there is a d-bag, who just doesn't do what everybody wants them to: Dwight from The Office [1], Grinch from How Grinch Stole Christmas [2]. Lane-hogging scums are d-bags native to communal motorways, a distant relative to shopping-lane scums, another prevalent species of d-bags. Lane-hoggers feed upon the irate honks and rising stress-levels of people behind them. The very act of using speed cameras as lane discipline-enforcement cameras will put a cap on the d0uchebaggery and destroy the lane-hogger's primary food source, consequently starving them to death. Extinction of lane-hogging scums means imbalance in the fragile traffic ecosystem, causing havoc and turmoil to all its inhabitants. Disadvantage 2: Extinction of Lane-hoggers helps other D0uchebags like "lax bros" to become more prevalent Extinction of scums will reduce people's stress levels and it is a well-known fact that low stress level equates to fitness. More and more people will become fit and this will spawn d-bags like lax bros or beach boys in large volume. Lax bros are abhorrent creatures who spend half their lifetime playing lacrosse and drinking mountains and mountains of Brisk as demonstrated in the youtube video http://www.youtube.com... Their laxness will infect others, and human kind will become one giant muscle-packed ball of lacrosse-playing snobs. Disadvantage 3: Alt possibility: Overcompensation In an attempt at recovery, the traffic ecosystem will overcompensate for the extinction of lane-hogging scums. This will lead to birth of more d0uchebags drones. They will conquer the roads like a swarm of locusts. Conclusion Pro does not understand the fundamental nature of d0uchebags and of our traffic ecosystem. Any attempt to eradicate them will lead to fatal backfire and spawnage of even more d-bags than ever before. Because I have effectively given three good reasons as to why his plan must not be carried through, the voters must vote CON. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org...