Communism is better, in general, than Capitalism

I am seriously getting tired of these personal attacks by PRO. Focus on the facts, not the person presenting them"he did not follow the rules, as he attacked my rebuttals in round 3"I believe that my opponent naively misinterpreted the rules. The rules stated:2nd round: ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE.3rd round: Rebuttal of opponents arguments and evidence.My opponent did not specify which arguments and evidence to counteract in Round 3. Not in one place does it say that I have to counteract the arguments from Round 2. After all, my opponent has introduced new arguments in Round 3 (useless ramblings about tenant farming). I urge the readers to see that the rules are open up to interpretation from different people. I hope that my opponent will recognize his mistake and not do it in future debates. Communism is better for the people as a wholeWhat I find amusing is the category that my opponent chose to attack. The categories of "incentive" (where I provided scientific evidence of money being an incentive), "majority of the world uses capitalism" (which is a nearly irrefutable argument), and "rise to the top" (where I showed that capitalism allows everybody to succeed) were by far my strongest. I don't care what my opponent decided to attack, but I think that readers should take this into consideration.Since I believe that "Communism is better for the people as a whole" is the only argument that I have to actually defend, I will therefore negate my opponent's arguments. I will not be directly attacking his "tenant farming" argument since that has nothing to do with our topics and is simply useless rambling. I will be talking why capitalism is better for people as whole in contemporary times."According to the U.S. Census Bureau data released Tuesday September 13th, 2011, the nation's poverty rate rose to 15.1% in 2010"(1)As stated in the first round, you must show that capitalism is better for more than 50% of the people. We can safely assume that the 15% living at or below the poverty line are victims of capitalism. However for the majority (85%) of the people, capitalism works. They are not in poverty. Therefore since the majority of citizens have a roof over their head, food in their house, and can support their children, capitalism works.One more point: communism failed. Soviet Russia, China, and the few other communist states have either failed or are under extreme tension. North Korea for example can't feed its own people. I urge my readers to visit this website (2):http://www.amnesty.org...It shows the exact horrors of what a communist regime does to its own citizens. ConclusionCommunism doesn't work. There is a reason that 99.6% of the world uses capitalism: it works. Communism has been both tried and failed. It is a horror that starves and doesn't give equal chances to its own people. There is absolutely no incentive for a communist worker to try to work hard, as demonstrated in my previous round. My opponent has not demonstrated why communism is better for the majority of the people; while I have. Capitalism is a proven theory that works while communism fails.I urge the readers to vote for CON.(1)http://en.wikipedia.org...(2)http://www.amnesty.org...