Society's Acceptance of Homosexuality is a Slippery Slope

You want to play? All right, I'll play. First of all, I thank my opponent for finally laying down in plain language what questions he expects me to answer. You said a whole bunch of other stuff, but I'm going to skip down to your 14 questions. Q1. In what way do you perceive Homosexuality leads to incestual relationships? A1. When society decides they're going to throw away an ancient taboo concerning who you can and who you cannot marry, why won't they throw away other millenia-old marriage taboos? Q2. Why does heterosexuality not lead to incestual relationships? A2. Not closely related heterosexual relationships are not taboo in any culture. No taboo is thrown away through this. Q3. Why is incestual relationships a problem? A3. Aside from the fact that it is also a taboo and that its emergence can get rid of further taboos, it's problematic genetic-wise, and society could only withstand a small minority engaging in these kind of relationships. Q4. How did you come to the conclusion that an animal "not running away" means the animal gives consent to a human? Do you have statistics and evidence that demonstrates an animal's psychological reactance and behaviors? A4. Likewise, do you have any evidence that an animal "not running away" is evidence that it is frozen with fear or that, in spite of being sexually mature, does not understand the nature of what is going on? Q5. In what way do you perceive Homosexuality leads to bestiality? A5. Same as incest. It's a taboo that can get thrown aside after the first taboo is thrown aside. Q6. Why does heterosexuality not lead to bestiality? A6. Same as incest. Not closely related both human heterosexual relationships are not a taboo in any culture. No taboo is thrown away through this. Q7. Is homosexuality to you 100% about sex, is it about human romance? A7. It is the byproduct of sexual depravity. Yes, unless it is about dominance it is about sex. Q8. In what ways does bestiality have anything to do with human romance? A8. Well there's a human involved, isn't there? Q9. In the last round you said this a few times: If you dismiss this argument, you also dismiss this argument from pro-gay usage. Can you explain your thought proces on why you feel it is necessary to argue other people's arguments rather than the 2 clear contentions I laid out in Round 1? A9. This debate is about the slippery slope argument. Q10. Do you find it contradictory at all that all of your arguments can be re-directed back to heterosexuality? If not can you explain in detail how they are not? A10. As I've stated before, same-species not closely related heterosexuality isn't a taboo in any culture. No taboos are broken through this. Q11. In what way do you perceive homosexuality leads to pedophila? A11. Actually, pedophilia was not a taboo in most ancient cultures. By pedophila i'm referring to teenagers entering relationships with adults. Heterosexuality, homosexuality, neither one leads to something that has already existed. I give you this one. Q12. Why does heterosexuality not lead to pedophilia? A12. Actually, according to nature pedophilia is natural. I give you this one too. Q13. In your last round you said this "gayness isn't actually natural in humans." Can you provide me the source of where you got this information? A13. I don't trust the pro-gay data coming in from scientists who are pro-gay, the same way I don't trust pro-climate change data coming from pro-climate change scientists. You cannot always trust slanted studies. Q14. In your last round you said this "the animal smoochers and the sister smoochers and the 40 year olds with the 15 year old girlfriends are inspired to fight for their 'rights' by the homosexuals" Can you provide me with the source of where you got this information? A14. Well, I honestly don't yet, since the pro-incest, pro-zoophilia, and pro-pedophile movements have yet to emerge. Neither of us can either confirm this or un-confirm this until it happens. However, it makes sense that one group of people fighting for their "rights" leads to a group of similar people fighting for their "rights." There, I answered your 14 questions. You say I haven't provided any proof, but that's because I cannot offer you concrete proof, considering the movements mentioned above are yet to have emerged. But in 20 years or so, you'll see that I was right. All you need is a really smart guy who can argue his case well and you can justify well-night anything. If all you have is logic and statistics, you can find ways to justify homosexuality, incest, bestiality, and pedophilia, as well as adultery, one night stands, illicit drug usage, and maybe even cannibalism (with limiitations, of course). Heck, I could advocate child abuse by telling you it makes them tougher. Logic will betray society one day and give way to the legalization of various behaviors. It already has with homosexuality. The only thing standing in the way is this line, the line I mentioned. The line that no matter what kind of justification you have this line must not be crossed. Doubtless you'll think that I still haven't answered your contentions. You'll think my arguments are "irrelevent," "straw arguments," "beating around the bush," "ridiculous," "lacking proof," bla bla bla. And you're not the first one. There was another debater here on DDO who did the same thing when I debated him. So it is not enough for you people simply to provide a rebuttal for my arguments?! If this is what every debater I come across does to me, I'm not going to play this game anymore. Bubba the Clown is finished with organized debates, or at least for the time being. Maybe I'll still hang around the polls and forums. Feel free to declare yourself the victor here.