The Earth orbits the Sun

First of all about Darwin and the Heliocentric model, I apologize, I did mean Copernicus. You asked what constant force keeps the planets moving assuming that the aether (space) itself is not moving. this is the Geocentric theory that all stars, planets and the aether itself have been set in motion around the Earth. Look up Dr. Robert Sungenis, a researcher of Geocentric cosmology. According to the Geocentric model, Mars, and Venus orbit around the Sun as the Sun orbits the Earth. This would put Mars and Venus on either side of the sun only part of the time and they would draw closer and then farther from the Earth as they orbit the Sun. Jupiter's orbit around the Earth causes it to draw close on one side and far on the other. . Long video, watch it all if you want, but there is and example of the model I just said in the beginning, 2:40 into the video. The measurements of these planets were made assuming that they all stayed the same distance from each other at all times. Although I do not believe that scientists really have the ability to calculate the distance of the stars as they are just too far away. Objects fall and are Earth bound because the gravity of Earth bares full relevance within its less dense atmosphere. A space ship only uses its power jets until it leaves the Earth's atmosphere. And once again, the planets do not fly off into space because the density of space keeps them were they are. Like stirring a pot of soup. The contents of the soup do not stay in place because of gravity, but because of the density of the water. You are completely incorrect about the Moon, it has nothing to do with perspective. It either is or it isn't moving. Let's say there were two men on a track around a football field. One man's name is Earth, the other man's name is Moon. Earth begins running at a constant speed around the field. As he runs, Moon begins to run circles around him as they both run around the field together. This is a model of how the Earth and Moon orbit the sun according to the Heliocentric model. But in order for Moon to run circles around Earth, he has to accelerate on Earth's right, pass him, cross in front to Earth's left, decelerate, and cross behind Earth towards his right, and then repeat. If the Moon is doing this, It is breaking the Law of physics that clearly states: An object at rest or in motion will remain as such unless acted on by another force. So far I have validated both My Polaris argument and my Moon argument that both refute the Heliocentric model. Now I will present one more argument: According to the Heliocentric model, the Earth orbits a stationary Sun with a 300 million km wide orbit... At the same time Polaris sits stationary with the Sun directly in point of Earth's 23.4 degree axis. Here is the problem, if Earth makes a 300 million km wide orbit, its axis would of course orbit with it, and would no longer be pointing at Polaris. As Polaris remains stationary with the Sun, Polaris would also be appearing to orbit the Earth just like the Sun. You can watch this video if you want to see a visual description of what I am talking about. He has an annoying voice so bear through. The visual description of this starts at 1:14 into the video. In the Geocentric model, Earth sits stationary with no tilt, and Polaris sits directly above. I will also mention a few experiments that proved the Earth was stationary and everything else moving, but were thrown under the rug so to speak because they completely contradict the presently accepted orthodox views of our planetary system and astronomy in general. 1. The Michelson-Gale Experiment 2. "Airey's failure" experiment 3. Sagnac's experiment 4. The Michelson-Morley experiment You can look these up yourself. This video explains them all.