Colonialism; YAY OR NAY

My ideas do not doubt that colonialism did not exist however as I mentioned before, WARS were started through Colonialism and LIVES were lost not dolls. You mention that the First Nations people were at war. However, you and show false information on how the indigenous people went to war with each other; First Nations people ( as you should address them as) seldom went to war and their method of trade and living was not the slightest barbaric and that is, in fact, stereotyping. The Spanish had started a war with the indigenous people, not the First Nations people. Today, you say that if it weren't for Colonialism, countries would not have been as contemporary as they are now, I disagree, Countries today are still governed by the classes of wealth, and a great example is Africa-which you mentioned. The colonized are commonly at the bottom in class. You also mentioned-when you were finishing your argument-India; India was becoming poor as the British had rule over India and did not thrive in any positive ways. Only few countries has been shown to thrive through colonialism. After the First World War, the German colonial empire and much of the Ottoman Empire were divided between the victorious allies as League of Nations mandates. These territories were divided into three classes according to how quickly it was deemed that they would be ready for independence. However, decolonisation did not really get going until after the Second World War. In 1962, the United Nations' Special Committee on Decolonization, often called the Committee of 24, was set up to encourage this process. Everything in the human world of Earth has to be a race. In the Scramble for Africa all the countries felt the need and greed to conquer more. Exploration and conquering causes severe wars; in fact the majority of the Early Wars were instigated by the conquering and exploring frenzies. Exploration has done bad to us, thus we could be living better in the present. The Aboriginals were doing better without us so why do we even try? Encounters between European explorers and populations in the rest of the world often introduced local epidemics of extraordinary virulence. Disease killed the entire native (Guanches) population of the Canary Islands in the 16th century. Half the native population of Hispaniola in 1518 was killed by smallpox. Smallpox also ravaged Mexico in the 1520s, killing 150,000 in Tenochtitlï¿½n alone, including the emperor, and Peru in the 1530s, aiding the European conquerors. Measles killed a further two million Mexican natives in the 1600s. In 1618–1619, smallpox wiped out 90% of the Massachusetts Bay Native Americans. Smallpox epidemics in 1780–1782 and 1837–1838 brought devastation and drastic depopulation among the Plains Indians. Some believe that the death of up to 95% of the Native American population of the New World was caused by Old World diseases. Over the centuries, the Europeans had developed high degrees of immunity to these diseases, while the indigenous peoples had no such immunity. Smallpox decimated the native population of Australia, killing around 50% of Indigenous Australians in the early years of British colonisation. It also killed many New Zealand Māori. As late as 1848–49, as many as 40,000 out of 150,000 Hawaiians are estimated to have died of measles, whooping cough and influenza. Introduced diseases, notably smallpox, nearly wiped out the native population of Easter Island. In 1875, measles killed over 40,000 Fijians, approximately one-third of the population. Ainu population decreased drastically in the 19th century, due in large part to infectious diseases brought by Japanese settlers pouring into Hokkaido. Researchers concluded that syphilis was carried from the New World to Europe after Columbus's voyages. The findings suggested Europeans could have carried the nonvenereal tropical bacteria home, where the organisms may have mutated into a more deadly form in the different conditions of Europe. The disease was more frequently fatal than it is today. Syphilis was a major killer in Europe during the Renaissance. The first cholera pandemic began in Bengal, and then spread across India by 1820. 10,000 British troops and countless Indians died during this pandemic. Between 1736 and 1834 only some 10% of East India Company's officers survived to take the final voyage home. Waldemar Haffkine, who mainly worked in India, was the first microbiologist who developed and used vaccines against cholera and bubonic plague. A discussion on the nature of how diseases were spread has often been scuttled by descendants of colonialists in order to conceal the actual origins of the how certain indigenous populations were inoculated with these new diseases. The argument here is that once European colonists discovered that indigenous populations were not immune to certain diseases, they attempted to further the spread of diseases in order to gain military advantages and subjugate local peoples. The most famous is that of Jeffery Amherst. Many scholars have argued that the body of evidence which sees this practice as having been executed on a larger scale across North America is weak. Yet growing evidence is showing that other indigenous communities were purposefully inoculated citing oral history from the descendants of said peoples. It has been regarded as one of the first instances of bio-terrorism or use of biological weapons in the history of warfare.