National Socialism vs Communism

First off, it's not called nazism. It's called national socialism. People who call it nazism are imbecilic cunts who know nothing about the ideology, and use it as an insult to everyone they disagree with. Communism is so obviously wrong that every communist politician and activist should be executed even if they never unjustifiably imprisoned or executed anyone. Communist systems (that is, a system where the government owns all the means of production) are very obviously flawed theoretically (see Ludwig von Mises) and history has proven this. It is impossible to run a communist country well and that mass starvation and low standards of living are an inevitable result. No country in the world has ever even been communist. Every country that has claimed to be a communist country, are either socialist (low-key communism) or capitalist (China). These results are so obvious that any communist politician/activist should be executed for the simple violation of promoting communism. Why? Because if Karl Marx and his crew never existed then such things as mass starvation would not have occurred in the USSR, early PRC, Vietnam and North Korea. Essentially, they deserve to die for coming to incorrect disastrous conclusions about economic systems and implementing those conclusions. Imagine that a popular movement to implement Communism is your country occurred. Enough politicians were elected to implement policies that effectively made your country a Communist. I would become a rebel to fight the establishment, or just move away. I would definitely kill though if no one was allowed to leave the country - which is historically typical of Communist governments.A279; National socialism is a philosophy (or worldview) that is based on three principles: (1) *Natural Order.* We believe that the universe is governed by natural laws. In order for Man to be happy and successful, he must first learn what these laws are and then follow them. We believe that Man is a part of the natural world and that he is in no way separate or distinct from it. Consequently, we believe that society should be structured in accordance with the laws of nature, and not in opposition to them as is the case today. Under national socialism, every aspect of society will be in accord with the natural order: the way we structure the government, the way we raise our children, the way we plan our cities, the way we grow our food--EVERYTHING. Indeed, in this context, national socialism is the original "green movement." (2) *Racial Idealism.* Racial idealism is based on the love of your own race and people. It means placing the welfare and interests of the racial community to which you belong ahead of your own political interests and desires. As racial idealists, we have no wish to harm, persecute, control or exploit other racial groups. We are only interested in protecting out own people. And don't start telling me about the holocaust, because it didn't happen and you have no proof that it happened. We believe that all men are NOT created equal. Just as every individual has his own personal strengths and weaknesses, so each race has certain qualities that make it different from other races. We believe that the Aryan (North Germanic/Nordic) and the entire White race has the right to maintain its biological, cultural and political independence, and that it has the right to control its own destiny. We also believe that Whites and Aryans (A superior sub-race to the White race) have the right to defend themselves against all attacks--no matter where they come from. (3) *The Upward Development of the White and Aryan Race.* We want to do more than just defend our race: we want to see it improve. This can be done by encouraging a high birthrate among those Whites and Aryans who are the healthiest, strongest and most intelligent. At the same time, science should work to eliminate hereditary weaknesses and defects among our people by seeking birth control among those people. Our goal is that each new generation of White and Aryan children will be better off than the one before it. The national socialist movement started in 1919 with Anton Drexler. In 1933, the first national socialist state was formed when Adolf Hitler was elected chancellor of Germany. In 1945, it suffered a military defeat at the hands of its enemies. This catastrophic blow was the greatest disaster to befall the Whites and Aryans in recorded history. In 1959, an American naval commander named George Lincoln Rockwell resurrected national socialism in the United States. This reborn movement has since spread to every White nation on the globe, and also Japan. Popular movements include: - Nordic Resistance Movement (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland) - National Action (United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia) - National Democratic Party (Germany) - German Alternative (Germany) - Vigrid (Norway) - United Patriots Front (Australia) - France-R"surrection (France) - Dritter Weg (Germany) - National Radical Camp (Poland) - Workers' Party of Social Justice (Czechia) - Traditionalist Worker Party (United States) - Jobbik (Hungary) - National Socialistic Japanese Workers' Party (Japan) -------------------------- Now, for the economics of national socialism. "The work that everybody is called on to supply cannot be judged by its objective value. Everyone has only one duty: to take trouble. Whoever does this duty becomes, by doing so, indispensable to the community -- whether it is something that only he can do, or that's within the capacities of anyone. Otherwise the man who achieves something important, the effect of which can be felt for decades, or even for centuries, would have a right to puff himself up and despise the man who sweeps the streets." - Adolf Hitler To understand national socialist economics, it is first necessary to realize that communism has the same goal as capitalism, and that it is this goal which is morally unacceptable. Believing in the primacy of the consumer, these economics are based around the economic problem of maximizing human wants attained by the exploitation of limited resources. The only disagreement between these and various other non-Aryan economic theories regards how better to accomplish their shared goal, usually based on whether a top-down or bottom-up feedback circuit is more effective. National socialist economics differs fundamentally from all of these by refusing to treat consumption, and hence productivity, as valuable in itself. Instead, we view economic activity as *remedial* in character. Production is justified on the grounds that it provides unwanted but necessary material remedies to problems that if left unattended will prevent us from fulfilling our purpose. For example, we do not want to be hungry, yet hunger is an unfortunate biological reality, therefore we quite literally take the trouble to produce food in order to remedy the problem of hunger (that we nonetheless would prefer never existed in the first place). But the moment we forget that food is a remedy to hunger and start thinking of hunger as a mechanism that allows us to enjoy food, we fall back into the consumerist mindset. "It is the high task of our national economy to direct the consumption power of our people along lines which can be satisfied out of the resources of our own national production." - Adolf Hitler A National Socialist economy is not centrally planned, but centrally directed. Central planning involves taking demand for granted and then using the state to regulate supply. Central direction involves determining adequate supply and then using the state to limit demand. Hence a National Socialist economy should not be confused with a mixed-market economy, which is a fundamentally capitalist economy with state intervention in subservience to implicitly capitalist values. Hitler himself had no role in micromanaging the economy of National Socialist Germany, but rather was responsible for preventing the economy (and hence those who would seek to manipulate it by investments) from leading astray the state. A National Socialist government guarantees zero unemployment by making it duty of the state to assign a living-wage job to anyone and everyone who wants one. Private businesses, whose task is not to put people to work but to be a reliable provider of their professed products/services, are justified in not hiring more employees than they need to provide their product/service in the required quantity (and no more than this quantity). It therefore falls upon the state to create public works projects " typically in infrastructure, community service or any other field that passively benefits the country as a whole - capable of absorbing all the workers that the private sector cannot absorb, as demonstrated in the Reichsarbeitsdienst and related programs of National Socialist Germany. Note that such assignment should never be compulsory upon anyone, but merely be an offer that is always open. This is not to say that community-minded private businesses cannot also help absorb the unemployed " they could readily do so (and would be actively encouraged to do so by a National Socialist government) by splitting each full-time job into two or more part-time jobs for corresponding fractions of full-time wages until all competent workers have been absorbed. It is mindblowingly simple when you think about it. Hitler warned that: "The basis of Jewish commercial policy is to make matters incomprehensible for a normal brain." Certainly, Jewish collective success throughout history has consistently correlated with the economic complexity of the society involved, hence the ZC propaganda throughout the colonial era to convince the complex economic societies of their "superiority" over the more economically simple (so-called "Third World") societies that they colonized, in order to discourage the former from learning from the latter