The god that christians believe in is amazingly STUPID!!!!

So I'll start with the premise of the debate response. Yes, I did read the title of the debate. "The god that Christians believe in is amazingly STUPID!!!!" is not exactly what I would call a substantive debate in that there are no positions that aren't an emotion filled screaming match. I feel the rules section you lined up is a better wording for the debate topic you want, so I chose to go with that. As for another point, the spiel about there being multiple gods is completely irrelevant in this debate. You pointed out a specific god, (Known as God/Yahweh/The Lord in the bible.) And when I reference him by what he's referred to as you take it as a way to discredit the christian god because other religions exist? I'm assuming what you mean by this is along the lines of because so many other religions exist, religions are less trustworthy? But that's a false dichotomy. Just because there's many versions of what God created what doesn't mean all are wrong. You can't look at billions of people's lifestyles and say all those lifestyles are wrong because people with other lifestyles exist. I'm glad you linked the Richard Carrier. This is where the crossroads exists. You can either take what Jesus said as hullabaloo and say that while he existed, he was just a crazy guy, or you can say that he was genuine and the true messiah. I hope my argument didn't come off as "Jesus existed therefore God is entirely real and the ruler of all". What I mean with that point is the Jesus stuff did happen, but it's up to people the believe whether Jesus was the real deal or not. I wold also like to address the care for people part because I think its important. You say the god of the bible doesn't care. And yes, I know, before you point out "What about slavery in the bible, what about child abuse in the bible, what about x in the bible". I agree, that stuff exists in the bible, and I'm not going to fight for its morality, because I don't believe there is rationale in that. But, I will say that is an update that has come about in the last 2000 years. Christianity, to many people is somewhat of a living religion in that it does change with the times. The vast majority of Christians, if not all Christians, condemn slavery now, most Christians condemn child abuse , and other examples like that. Some updates of the Bible completely omit those sections! While I don't agree with the omission of those sections because I think revisionist history is wrong, it's hard to say there hasn't been updates. I would also like to make a point against one of the points in one of the videos you provided me. If you read the entirety of the bible, and come away with only those messages of slavery and child abuse, you are either skimming through it to make a point against it or just ignorant. The bible says so much more about morals and ethics that so many people believe in now and what shaped most of Western Civilization. And to address the "Purpose of this debate section". I completely disagree with your point of view. From your perspective, Christianity should be completely abolished because you don't agree with its legitimacy? As I think I've done pretty well, have provided evidence that people do genuinely believe in communications of God that aren't text. Some people even claim to see him during natural disasters as "he is angry". Now you'll usually see this with radicalists that line up with First Great Awakening ideals, however you think just because you don't believe in his existence that this somehow disallows others from seeing his work in aspects of life. Most Christians believe that when you believe in God you notice his communication in everything. So, I guess what I'm saying this boils down to is that your faith in something higher may be responsible for everyday things.