world peace is a myth

Rebuttal: "…not all political leaders have taken away freedoms. George Washington fought to get freedoms for the American people; he did not take them away." Unknowingly, by breaking away from England and creating a new country, freedoms became more restricted. Intestinally or not, the declaration of Independence and Constitution limited rights of women and African Americans (and slaves) [1, 2, 3]. Only males had the ability to enjoy all the rights created for the newly created country. Did slaves have rights? They did not, they were considered to be property, therefore had no rights [3]. Because not everyone had rights (or equal rights), freedoms were limited. After successfully breaking away from Brittan (after both wars), all Americans still did not have complete freedom. Government itself limits freedom, just because one has "basic" freedoms, such as freedom of speech and religion that does not mean I "legally" can do anything, therefore I have limited freedoms [1]. If I were to break a law and end up in jail, all my rights would be taken away, therefore prisoners have limited rights as well. "… Humans are born killing machines, we have been killing things since we were created one of our greatest inventions, fire, a tool of death, we always have and always will war." The initial purpose of stone tools [4], the bow and arrow [5], and fire [6], were not intended to be used for war. Stone tools were used because the made Neolithic life [17] easier, the bow and arrow, along with other hunting tools, were used for just that, to make hunting easier and more successful, and fire provided heat and light, not death. As said earlier, how on acts on emotion is not human nature, but personal character. If a nomadic tribe were to attack a tribe who had fire, it would not be out of human nature, but out of jealousy. The creation and use of these tools and technologies were one of the leading causes for war, and the end of a peaceful (yet barbaric) time period. Life would now be competition between the "has" and "has not's", mentioned in the book Gun, Germs, and Steel, by Jared Diamond, a researcher trying to find the source of human inequality [7]. This is evident in Mongol raids in China [8], Germanic tribes raiding the west (Viking raids) [9], and the crusades [10]. Today, citizens of the world are one of two major categories being; first-world [11] or third-world [12]. Most first-world countries are relatively equal, having taken care of all the basic human needs, such as sufficient water sources, food, and shelter. Third-world counties struggle getting on or more of these basic needs. Conflict between third-world and first-world that result in violence and war are categorized as war of worlds (third and first). Similarly to this, there are smaller scale wars that happen within an individual country. When clear lines are drawn between groups of people who have what they need, and those who do not, there is a break in the population, and social classes are developed. When the group of people who can provide choice to be ignorant of those who cannot, and do nothing to help, conflicts often occur. Examples of this would be; internal conflict in latter Western Rome [13], Late Han China (Yellow turban revolt) [14], and the French Revolution [15]. If France, the higher class had everything they could need (easy life), while the lower class often had to deal with hunger and starvation. The result of no action being taken lead to revolt and attack of the higher class, by the lower class. "Modern War" [16] is a combination between self-defense (of a country), ideology, and economics. Obviously, when one country wages war on the other, the defendant will to everything to prevent destructions. Ideology addresses many things, but the underling ideas are similar to war between classes and how government choice to handle wealth and freedoms. Wars started because of economics is most closely related to early fights between tribes, someone has something (or more of something) than the other, and jealousy leads to a violent course of actions (war). The underlining cause of war is because of inequality, which modernizations and advancement in technology, dating back to the inventions of fire and agriculture. In order to achieve world peace, all that would have to be done would be to allow everyone to become equal. Communism attempted this, but greed of administers and corrupt leaders lead to the failure of the system. Before the idea of wealth (Paleolithic/lower Neolithic time period [17, 18]), man was equal. By the world being in a state of equality, there was an absents of war, thus creating world peace. To bring the world back to a global peace, equality of every human being would have to be restored. Sources: [1] Constiutional Rights: http://www.usconstitution.net... [2]Women's Rights: http://en.wikipedia.org... [3]Slavery in America: http://en.wikipedia.org... [4]Stone Tools: http://en.wikipedia.org... [5]Bow and Arrow: http://en.wikipedia.org... [6]Fire: http://archaeology.about.com... [7]Gun, Germs, Steel: http://en.wikipedia.org... [8]Mongol Raid: http://www.travelchinaguide.com... [9]Vikings: http://en.wikipedia.org... [10]Crusades: http://en.wikipedia.org... [11]First-World: http://en.wikipedia.org... [12]Third-World:http://en.wikipedia.org... [13]Fall of Rome: http://en.wikipedia.org... [14]Yellow Turban Rebellion: http://en.wikipedia.org... [15]French Revolution: http://en.wikipedia.org... [16]Modern War: http://en.wikipedia.org... [17]Neolitch: http://en.wikipedia.org... [18]Paleolitch: http://en.wikipedia.org...