Abiogenesis is the more probable explanation for the origin of life

I had no idea what abiogenesis meant until this debate challenge so I looked it up on Google. From what I gathered, there are people on this planet who don't want to believe that a Master Designer is responsible for putting together a universe that most human beings can see. Since I know for sure that life didn't come from rocks deciding to start running around and calling themselves names, my arguments won't include plagiarism that my opponent will have to use in order to make you believe him. What I mean by this is that I won't have to look up anything in Google to pretend I know something like my opponent will have to. Anyone can search Google and copy someone's written information or watch videos by liars who think they know the answers to life. I don't need to plagiarize by copying other people's work and pretend I know something about how life began. I was created as God's voice so whatever I write or speak comes directly from our Creator who created everything, first as invisible waves, then into information we created invisible "beings" can understand such as spoken languages and illusions that we see. These invisible waves don't take up space and can't possibly be made into matter since they are totally invisible. Time doesn't exist, either, unless these illusions appear to move from each created being's perspective. Since invisible waves don't need space, matter or time to exist, then everything we see has to be illusions. It's impossible that matter can be formed from something completely invisible such as the Big Bang theory that once was considered to be the truth according to most physicists fifty years ago. Many physicists still believe in this Big Bang theory but that's only because they are deceived into believing that particles consist of matter. However, some of their tests are showing that these particles only appear when they're observed. When they're not observed, they are only invisible waves. This should tell anyone that particles are only illusions that seem to be real when they're observed and then go back to reality as waves when not being observed. The reason physicists don't want to claim that particles are only illusions is that it's too radical for the public to accept. Can you imagine a quantum physicist being rejected by the rest of his peers if he began preaching that everything we see are only illusions? The problem this quantum physicist would have is that he wouldn't have any knowledge to know how these illusions were formed by our Master Designer so he would look like a fool to the rest of the world. No man is going to face the world without any knowledge to back up his claim that everything we see are only illusions. Only a saint of our Master Designer could face the world and tell every illusion ( body of a man ) that his body is only an illusion that isn't real. The reason we can say these things is because we have the mind of our Master Designer to speak from and this gives us complete confidence in what we claim to be true. Like any physicist who uses analogies to explain his work to those who don't understand the language of mathematics, we saints have to use similar analogies to help explain to God's believers ( those who were chosen to listen to us ) about how God created everything as invisible waves before being processed into illusions that most people in this era believed were real. We saints learn that everything we see are only illusions. All this knowledge is taught directly to us by our Master Designer who we speak for. Can I prove with evidence that there's an invisible Master Designer? If I could prove that everything we see came from processed wavelengths of energy that were spoken by my true created existence as God's voice, I would be given all the scientific awards in this world. But since I cannot prove that I'm God's created voice, and that everything we see in the universe are only illusions without space, time or matter, then it's impossible for you to know for sure how we were created and how life began. On the other hand, my opponent cannot prove that life started from the illusions that he believes are real. He can plagiarize all the scientists in this world and pretend he knows something but he won't be able to come up with proof that life started the abiogenesis way of thinking. First of all, there's no equipment designed today to tell us for sure that time, space and matter exists. All scientists have are observations of the illusions they think are real. All I have are the thoughts of our Creator to let me know our true created existence within His mind. If you believe we came from inanimate rocks that got up and started dancing with each other, then agree with my opponent. if you believe that we came from invisible wavelengths of energy that are formed into physical appearing bodies that give us the sense of being something real, then you may agree with some of the things I've been sharing with you in this debate. Since neither one of us can give you proof on how life began, debates like this will NOT reveal the Truth, which is the name our Creator gave to Himself and His thoughts that were spoken into invisible waves ( God's consciousness ). God bless you all, Saint Brad