My Case Against Miscegenation.

Okay, so I"d like to start out by highlighting how you finished your piece " with Godwin"s Law and the "holocaust". The topic is not about the "holocaust", if you want to discuss that then begin a debate on that. If it seems interesting I may debate it. Evoking Godwin"s Law so early in a debate is like potting the white and black ball together at pool. I guess if you didn"t know that before then you do now. In debate circles that is two huge own goals, so just offering some friendly advice on avoiding the tactic in the future. I can think of no more natural position than for a people to aspire to preserve their heritage, culture, and genetics that make them a people. I think this is an inherent right that all the different races and peoples of mankind should pursue without judgment nor critique. It is wrong lest anyone suggest or imply that to want this is somehow "bad" or "evil". In actual fact it is the polar opposite, it is the most natural thing of all. If you grow complacent and neglect your culture, heritage and gene pool then you are destined to lose it. Perhaps entirely and all that this would entail. Without doubt or question, almost all races and peoples are encouraged to preserve their own lands, culture, heritage and genes. Africans are at liberty to preserve such things, no one would call Pakistani"s racist for wanting their son or daughter to marry their own kind and only having children with those in their broad group. Even the legendary Ali said during an old interview with Parkinson, that black people should seek out and marry blacks and have black children, and white people should seek out their own and have white children. This was before politically allowed speech had fully taken its grip on what we"re allowed to see, hear or believe. Any person from within any culture and/or race who simply does not care if that race and culture thrive in the future is simply rooted in "self" and entirely in the today. Such a person cares not if a combination of unlimited mass undemocratic migration of a non- European people to Europe eventually leads to the end of the European people"s (and all their diversity). They have ceased to be fully sentient, since they are reduced to only thinking of self and often times only in the most material way. They have stripped themselves (or had stripped) their greater identity, their ancestry and any real roots or sense of belonging. That is why a person effected by that mind set can advocate for mass migration of non- Europeans to Europe and miscegenation " they just do not care. It would perhaps be the greatest tragedy in mankind"s history if the European people, who are so relatively small in number, were bred out by aggressive non democratic mass immigration together with the overt promotion of miscegenation in media, pop culture etc. This would matter to the Jewish people, the Indian people, the Japanese people etc, and it is right that it should matter " they very future and survival of their people is at stake. Why would it not matter? It should also matter to the white and European people for the same sorts of reasons " the only way to guarantee the future for your people and preserve its own unique culture is do so with in the blood, the genes. Miscegenation is demonstrably at odds with that. There are other issues to consider. They cannot be denied when laid bare. It may not be disapproved speech to point out physical differences between races, but it is definitely politically incorrect speech to extend those differences logically - to the intellectual. Naturally we must measure in averages. We can fairly state that men are usually taller and stronger than women, and even if you found a very tall or strong women, the rule would still be true. IQ is a standard and widely accepted measure of intellect, and intellect is self- evidently linked in to behaviours. The average IQ of an African American (sic) comes in at around 20 points less than that of a white American or Asian American, even when from the same socio economic background. African Americans average out at around 80/85, and whites and Asians average out at a 100 or a bit more. More exact figures are cited in my sources at the bottom. This difference is vast. In some parts of Africa that IQ can drop all the way down to 70. An IQ of 70 would generally be regarded as not even bright enough to stand trial by Western standards. I understand that there are ideas on "different kinds" of intelligence (creative, emotional etc), but we cannot dismiss or ignore these difference that do exist in IQ levels between blacks, whites, Asians etc. Can we measure this gap in points in real terms? Of course. We can see that blacks score poorly, repeatedly, in almost all core subjects on the school curriculum and do the poorest in exams. We can also see that Asians and whites do the best. We can also measure it in the different types of nations and societies that each race has fashioned, and we can see which are most advanced in science, technology, philosophy, music, art, engineering, etc etc. These were self-evident truths as mainstream until around 40yrs ago, when the first deceptive seeds of what was to be called "political correctness" were sown. Even if all the facts, data, research and observations say the opposite, we are fed this false narrative that there are simply no such thing as differences between races in matters of intelligence and creativity, that genetics plays zero part, and that we"re all little more than organic pods into which any personality or nature can simply be created by some vague and imaginary "equality" or by throwing money at state programme"s that are essentially designed to flatten the difference between the two intellects and pretend they are exactly the same. When two different races mix then on average, the race with the lower IQ has gained something while the race with the higher IQ and creativity has lost something. Taken as an average, the intellect of a child born to a black person and a white person will be greater than it might have been between two black people, but not as great as it might have been had it been two white people. The IQ Gap Between Races First of all, the IQ gap. For those who don't already know, there absolutely IS an objectively measurable IQ gap between people with ancestors from different geographical areas (aka "races", which is the term I will use from here on out). Psychologists do not debate this fact. The gap is well known and has been well known for decades. IQ test scores break down like this: on average, East Asians score higher than whites, who score higher than hispanics, who in turn score higher than blacks. The average scores are: Asian-Americans -106, White Americans - 103, Hispanic Americans - 89, African-Americans - 85. This means more than one in five American blacks have an IQ below 75; whereas around one in twenty whites have an IQ below 75. An IQ of 70-75 is considered "borderline retarded" by psychologists. Studies also show there are some significant differences in what is called the structure of mental abilities. For example, if you took a sample of black and white children, all of whom had scored around 100 on the WISC-R (the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children"Revised) meaning the black kids in the sample were well above the black average -- you would find significant black-white differences on six of the thirteen subtests. The average black child would do better on Arithmetic and Digit Span; where the average white child would do better on Comprehension, Block Design, Object Assembly, and Mazes. The gaps are not limited to the United States either. European whites average - 100, East Asians from Asia - 106, and Sub-Saharan Africans - 70. http://www.personalityresearch.org... In 1987 a survey of the opinion of IQ experts was published. One question concerned what caused the US Black-White IQ gap. The survey found a large support for a partial genetic, partial environmental explanation. The survey was later used in the book The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy (1988) which argued that general public was misled by the media regarding the expert opinion Further public debate ensued after the publication in 1994 of The Bell Curve which argued for the existence of race differences in IQ as well as stating that this is an important explanations for many social differences between the races such as regarding crime, education, unemployment, etc. In response to the Bell Curve debate and perceived false and highly misleading views in the public debate, the statement "Mainstream Science on Intelligence" was signed by 52 professors The American Psychological Association also responded to the debate by creating a committee which in 1995 published the report "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" which acknowledged the gap between the average IQ scores of Whites and Blacks, the importance of IQ, and stated that both genetic and environmental explanations had inadequate support. It concluded "In short, no adequate explanation of the differential between the IQ means of Blacks and Whites is presently available." https://en.wikipedia.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... The Black-White Gap demonstrates "In mathematics, a 26-point difference at the 4th grade level and a 31-point difference at the 8th grade level. "In reading, a 27-point difference at the 4th grade level and a 26-point difference at the 8th grade level. https://en.wikipedia.org...