Gun ownership is a absolute right and should not be regulated

Firstly, you didn’t post sources until round 2; you were too late to post sources for round 1. Second of that entire source you provided sent me to a random page, nowhere did I find that quote from Reagan. Third of all, your source needs to provide a source, where and when he and it an under what context, also what records show this. Fourth of all, even if you could prove it, it is irrelevant; this debate is about whether or not guns should be regulated, not whether or not Ronald Reagan thought they should be regulated. I said you were a fascist because your rhetoric is fascism, you believe that the government gets to decide if we are responsible enough for liberty, you believe that citizens should not be able to defend their property and liberties from their government, and you believe that we should submit our liberties for the good of the state as a whole, this is called fascism. If I confess ideologies and beliefs that bear a striking resemblance to that of Adolf Hitler, you may have a legitimate case to believe me a Nazi, but I do not, instead you confess beliefs which resemble almost exactly those of Mussolini. Now- if someone ran over a bunch of people, he would get arrested for murder, manslaughter, or at the very least criminal negligence, so taking away his license would make no sense seeing as though he isn’t driving anytime soon anyway. Also, if you will take note, I said I should be able to own any gun that I can afford, so there is no contradiction. Also if some maniac wants to buy a missile launcher, the gun salesman probably won’t sell one to him, and that’s fine, it’s his guns and his business, he can do what he wants. Also, teachers don’t need to know he is coming, all they need to know is “hey, they guy came out of his car with a bazooka, let me get out my gun,” either way if a guy comes into a school and aims a missile launcher they should know “oh, it’s a school bomber, shoot him.” Either way, your claim that there were “armed guards” is absurd; according to your source there was 1 retired police officer, who probably isn’t going to be the best shot. And your source is most likely flawed seeing as though the bar was a gun-free-zone. If you decide to lock your family in a bunker that is your choice; me practicing my liberties does not somehow automatically mandate you to lock yourself in a box, if you feel that it isn’t safe living in a free society, go move to prison and maybe there you can be happy where the people are unarmed and you are protected by nice, friendly, armed government officers. Maybe I should be able to live in peace free of liberals trying to confiscate my freedom. The militias would have already existed, no need to assemble, and if I try to blow up someone’s house they would know that their liberties are in danger and they would fight me. My analogy of people driving into houses with cars is not exaggerated; in fact it has actually happened on multiple occasions. {1} {2} There are a lot more but I think I’ve made my point, you can cause a lot of destruction with a car, in fact our most recent terrorist attack was done with a car, killing more people actually than shootings. It is also not an exaggerated guess to say that if the militias are separated they won’t be as big of a threat, it’s mathematically true. 3 militia= about equal to government, 1 militia= 1/3rd government, therefor unable to defeat government. I never said that increased gun ownership leads to more homicides, just that more of what homicides do happen are by gun. This is exactly my point, with more gun ownership homicides overall reduce, but what homicides do happen are more likely to be gun related, this is why liberal idiots only focus on homicides by gun, rather than the real numbers which show that gun ownership reduces crime. So would you rather live in Switzerland with 52 homicides overall and 52 homicides by gun, or Brittan with 658 homicides annually but 0 of them are gun related? I would rather have less homicides I don’t really care what criminals kill people with. And yes, all of the school shooters seem to be spoiled brats {3} Also, this is the point of the second amendment, a point anyway, you can tell because the founding fathers who wrote the second amendment said so. "A free people ought not only to be armed and diciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to mantain a status of independence from anyone who might attempt to abbuse them, includng their own government." - George Washington "When goveronment takes the citizens right to bear arms, the citizens must take away the goveronments right to govern." - George Washington "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves from tyranny in government." - James Madison {1}. http://www.baynews9.com... {2}. http://www.ktvb.com... {3}. http://www.infowars.com...