Inherited wealth is undeserveved taxes on estates should be radically increased not eliminated

Yes, It is yours. The communists were the ones to say that the wealth wasn't yours. How do the people who built the roads deserve the money you earned by offering something of value? And who built the roads? Also rich people. You are misunderstanding. Rich people don't offer things because they're rich. People become rich by offering things that the world wants/needs. Rich people who own companies and corporations. You say that the state must give it back to people who REALLY created it. The government created money by printing it. That's stupid. People who provide your electricity and food earn money for the value of their services. For example, The person who delivers the food earns less than the person who owns the food distribution company. This is not because he does less work. It's because what he does is of higher value. The work of the delivery man is easier to do, More people can do it who are willing to work for the same amount of money. The person who owns the company had to spend TONS of time and money setting up the company. He's invested more. If the company goes bankrupt, The owner has to pay off the debt to the workers and to the customers. The worker has to pay no debts. The services that make your life better and easier are provided by other people who are payed accordingly. For example, Amazon is a company that makes the lives of many people much more manageable and convenient. It's one of the services that you talk about when you say the parts of society that help you live and create. Most people can agree that Amazon is a great thing. Jeff Bezos earns more money than all the workers who work at Amazon distribution centers. He is not working any harder than them. However, He is the one who made the risk of starting the company and has invested much more than the workers at the distribution center. But overall, He is the one who created the business. He was able to gain this wealth by offering something that people wanted. He also has to pay for things that HE wants, Just like everybody else. He pays for food and a shelter just like all of us. The worker earns money by offering something that Jeff Bezos wants. The worker is doing a service that can be provided by many more people, And is alienable at a lower rate than the rate of Jeff Bezos. The worker could quit and Amazon would just replace him. If Jeff Bezos, Quit however, It would be completely different, Because what he does is a harder and more valuable service that requires more sacrifice. This is why capitalist economy's work. The people who provide a more valuable product and sacrifice more tend to end up rich. A lot of socialists hate people who own lots of assets/investors. They complain that they work harder than them. This may very well be true. However, I could work extremely hard at tearing paper. I could be working just as hard as the other guy in the factory. Does that mean that my labor should have the same value as his? Investors help the services like help us be us and create, And the service they offer is alienable at a higher rate, Mainly because it is of more use. People who do things that less other people cannot is a good indicator. A lot more people can do the workers job than do Jeff Bezos's job. Furthermore, The state has no right to your money once you are dead. That's what wills are for. YOU earn the money, YOU spend the money. It's not up to others to decide where the money goes. Rich people are the ones who benefit society as a whole by creating jobs and offering services. A lower-middle class person living in America today has it better off than a the richest person in the history of the world. This is because of rich people who offered things that made their lives better, Like Jeff Bezos not because of one worker who worked his butt off in a factory. If we want to benefit society as a whole we need MORE billionaires, Not less. We need everyone to get up off their butts and offer something. And stop looking up the ladder at the person who is richer than you and instead look toward the millions of people who have and had it way worse than you. If you are poor in America, You have it better than all the poor people before you in the history of the world because people like Henry Ford. Besides, Billionaire use most of their money to better the life of even more people. Taking their money as if it is yours is immoral. Also, You say that no one deserves to be rich while others are poor. So if I am unemployed and sit around playing video games all day, (another thing created by wealthy people that bettered the lives of many) and I am poor, I should be just as rich as a doctor who worked hard to offer something that other people need? Back to you: