Time Travel Into the Past Might Be Possible (Not Requiring the Help of God)

"The government could probably limit how many people could go all the way back to certain periods of time. Also, have you ever heard of a time tourist whose disguise failed, and resulted in his exposure? Didn't think so." The government? Limit successfully? I don't think so. Also, something has to mess up eventually, so eventually each year, one person would go to, let's say, 1776. After a million years, that would be a million extra people in the world. It would not be hidden. "But then the government could use time travel to arrest the person before he goes back in time." Ultra-major counter: If someone went back in time, it would instantly kill everything. If he was there, something would change something, altering the future, so that he didn't come back in the same conditions, if at all, rupturing the time-space continuum thing. It is impossible beyond how I can describe it. "So that's why none of the time travelers ever made it back to their original time..." It is impossible to change matter into energy in any way. "Now for the ultimate re-counter. A line is made up of an infinite number of points. A plane is made up of an infinite number of lines. A universe is made up of an infinite number of planes. Thus, time is made up of an infinite number of universes, arranged chronologically, all stored in a way that we cannot even understand." It would not be stored. Time moves continuously. It does not go back. It does not physically exist. It is change. It is how objects are given the opportunity to move. It can not be reversed. "And I'll bet that before Anaxagoras' time, the definition of Sun was: 'A large shining disk in the sky that brings light to Earth with its appearance, and takes away light with its leave.' The definition of Time would be changed to: 'a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which occur between past and present and future'" They didn't have dictionaries back then. Also, time is what we define it as, by definition. Seems obvious, doesn't it? This debate is about time travel. This is time. If it is not traveled through, then time is not traveled through. "That's just one group's opinion, and has not been proved. Look at this debate: "http://www.debate.org......; Con is winning." And debates mean that much too your opinion? "Breathing is good for you" is obvious, but the debate was still lost. Does that mean breathing is not good for you? No, it does not. "You don't know that." Yes, I do. I have something called common sense. You don't know that, either." Definitions define this debate. By definition. "Ah, but it is." But there is nowhere to store this up-to-infinite amount. "Perhaps when something happens in time, the effects would spread in a ripple forwards, and if you can travel through time faster than this ripple, you can reach the time that existed ordinarily before you triggered the ripple, and this gives you enough time to stop everything." You are talking about going through time faster than time can. That is impossible. "In conclusion, time travel backwards might be possible, and there is no way to prove against it." In conclusion, time travel backwards is impossible, and it is so because there is no way it could happen. Gracias.