Resolved: American government ought follow Biblical principles in making decisions for the country.

My opponent continues to argue on the basis of her definitions that she attempted to set forth in round two. As I've stated before, she is cheating. I won't address any points made outside the context of the agreed upon title resolution. No matter how hard she stomps her foot, no matter how loud she screams at Christians; this debate about the Bible, not about the Christians who follow it. She has already lied by this statement alone: Pro claims that "....I'm deviating from the original resolution, even though that I provide an observation and definition in the beginning of my debate explaining that we must look at the actions of Christianity based on their protocol and clearly define Christianity as the teachings of Jesus Christ (outlined, I assume in the Bible). I ask the voter to please scroll up and find this observation and definition statement before I accepted the debate. Con is cheating. She added to the rules and changed the resolution focus from "Bible" to "Christian". -------------------------------------- Con argues that the Bible teaches female "submission of a person onto another is to take a subordinate position." Imagine a man and a woman, sleeping in their bed. They are awoken suddenly by the sound of a window breaking in their living room. The man turns to his wife and whispers:" Baby, wake up. Someone is breaking into our house. Go downstairs and check it out." The man now sits in his bed, clutching his blanket in fear, while his wife goes downstairs to face the intruder. Let me ask this question to the voter. What do we call a man, who send his wife into danger, while he sits shaking in his bed?The correct answer is:"We would call him a lot of things. One thing we would not call him is 'a man.'" Society expects men to be protective of their women. The role of a good husband is to be the Shepard of his household. We already practice the very concept that the Bible is unfolding in it's pages. Men are the head of the traditional household. If I am lying, then the husband in this scenario is rightfully sending his wife to face the intruder.Con argues that the Bible condemns homosexuals. The Bible defines homosexuals as men who lay with other men, or women who sleep with other women. It does not condemn a person for feeling gay or for identifying with a gay lifestyle. It condemns the adulterous act of sex with another person of the same gender. I challenge Con to find a Bible verse that states:" God hates people who are drawn to homosexuality." The Bible clearly states, that God opposes "those who practice such things."Sources: Galatians 5 19Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, 21envy,d drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. Romans1: 26For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. 28And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. 29They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, 30slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32Though they know God’s decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them. Con makes the claim that the removal of the Bible from the classroom has been beneficial. Sources please.In the mean time, here is sources that claim the exact opposite. The Bible is quite beneficial in the classroom.Homeschools - http://www.christianpost.com...As Quoted: Many Christian families educate their children at home because it affords more family time, inspires respect for parents, offers flexible hours for vacations and allows for religion and Biblical studies. A National Home Education Research Institute study found that home learners consistently scored higher than public school students in social development - especially girls and older children. Because families have commit themselves to homeschooling for a few decades, many college graduates should be productive adults, research shows.