Laws restricting teens should be abolished.

Work 1. People tend tobe disrespectful to young people. Should we put these restrictions on a race/ethnic group just because people tend to be disrespectful to that group? No. 2. Even in theWestern countries, employers tend to overcome regulations which they do notconsider important. If these restrictions on youth were removed, youth can complainto a board without repercussions. If we advertised to a large audience the "employee & working board" (just like we have license departments for doctors and when a doctor doesn't follow the rules or is unethical we can complain to the state medical board). 3. Meanwhile,adults, while not trusting it entirely, believe in the authorities somewhatmore. But although that is correlated with age, it is not caused by age. Education 1. while it couldbe argued that there is nothing necessary apart from the basic tips of doing physical work, finding a home, and the alike, a few things are needed to be pointed out: one is that basic cultural knowledge and basic scientific knowledge makes one more broad-minded and, even more importantly, more critical, which is crucial nowadays. And critical thinking is a skill which has to be acquired via education - while one may encounter the "don't believe in anybody" thumb rule soon, without knowledge, they will never be able to spot the well-hidden lies, which might be included in complex sentencestructures, high level words, or numbers acquired via a non-scientific approach. Then why does school require we take gym (physical education)? It should be optional, right? And school should just require the basics of what we need for a job. We can do that with less school hours. Finland, ranked #1 in education in the world, there students only go to school for 4 hours a day, finish at 16 and start a age 7. They even abolished preschool. Can we learn all the aforementioned in less school hours? And also college students learn in college without the restrictions teens have. 2. Many teens consider the necessities as bad things and therefore would like to escape from them. We need necessities to survive. If teens need it to survive, why would they consider necessities as bad things? 3. One's education has a significant impact on their lives, which is often realized tens of yearsafter quitting the school. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Einstein quit school, and so did many other successful people. 4. Thus, let me point out that the more educated a person is, the less likely they tend to become criminals. That is because of our "go or no job" society.And there was a study that showed that things we learn in school don't evenhelp with the job. Runaway 1. Most of them had ran away because of a not discussed issue, which could range from depression to in-family problems. Should we look for adults who ran away because they might be having these issues? What about a wife who left her husband? Should we look for her because she might have these issues? Runaway laws harm teens who want to go somewhere but their parents say no. this just violates their personal autonomy. They should not be forced to accept what their parents want. A 16 year old and a 1 year old are at different levels, but have the same rights, and that's not right. 2. We also should mention that the police search often finds out that the lost teenager as actually been murdered. You have stated the contrary when you said "many of the young people running away will eventually get back to normal life." Most either go back to a normal life or are murdered. Before the industrial revolution there was no adolescence. Adolescence originated as compulsory schooling laws strengthened. Newresearch shows teens are just as competent as adults, and even superior to adults in in terms of memory, intelligence, and perception. And here is a link to this. http://homeedmag.com...