BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
My life is worse than my opponents

My opponent is so lucky. Why does he complain? My opponent's life is good because he has: 1. Access to actual food2. A roof over his head3. A bed of some sort4. Access to pencil and paper5. A piano and violen6. Time to use a bathroom7. Access to a computor As I have said before, my opponents life is no way as bad as mine. 1. While he is given coffee, I have to drink pee and slurp sh!t, like a slushy smoothie. 2. He has a roof over his head, I have my head over the roof; that's where I live. 3. No bed is provided for me. I sleep on the roof, as I previously stated4. In order to write this response, I use my blood after I prick my finger with a rusty nail I found. I write in blood, and then my only sibling that doesn't hate me types it and posts it here. (I get tetnis each debate I do, so she cuts my finger off for me. You don't want tot know what I'm writing this debate with. Ouch)5. Ten seconds to use the bathroom is ample time. I already told you that I have to hold my business in- along with that of the rest of my family. Also, since only half my body is male (the right half) going to the bathroom is difficult. 6. He is allowed to use instruments, and since he is Asian, he's not going to make a mistake. He lives in luxury compared to what I have to go through. My family kicks me in the crotch on the way into my house. My skin is so dark, my racist sister uses me as a slave on her plantation. Every time I try to kill myself, I fail. I have rugburns on my neck from the rope, and got sick from swallowing pills. I even shot myself, but the bullet navigated around my brain, and my mouth. But you know what they say, "Commit suicide, or die trying."My gay, black, homophobic, racist, brother is in the KKK, and hates Jews. He says whites are the root of all evil. (He's Hispanic)My stepmom is a ginger, and my soul exits my body one beating at a time. I live in a one- story hut. Oh, you think I mean one level? No, the only story in my house is the book my parents wrote about why they didn't want me. Each chapter highlights one bad trait about me. It's a long book. He gets the choice to eat off the floor. Lucky. My parents have hot-glued legos to the soles of my feet. Each step almost hurts as bad as the acerbic comments my siblings throw at me. All the friends I made in school have killed themselves because of how bad my life is. Being associated with me is worse than death. I'm running out of blood to write this, and the sh!t is starting to overflow in my mouth. Although I don't have eyes, see you soon! I rest my case. My life is the worst.
My life is worse than my opponents

You're lucky compared to me. I have no father or stepfather. My dad died in a infiltration to a secret labatory and he was found as a terrorist. Now the whole CIA and FBA are hunting us down, and everywhere we go, the agents come in and find us. My mother uses me as a vest and I have scars all over my body to prove it. My 7 sisters are annoying and when the agents come they run all over and stampede over me. I have bruises everywhere. We always get away because the agencies know I'm innocent, but we never get caught. It may sound good but we live terrible lives and my mom always gives the good food to her and her daughters while I get expired poisonous wild mushrooms and I have to drink nothing all day except for the morning, in which I'm forced to drink pure coffee per day with absolutely no addition to it, no sugar, no milk, no marshmallows, one gallon of JUST COFFEE. My mom says it's for my vitamins because I need to grow. My opponent thinks because I'm Asain I don't have to complain. But he is wrong. Not only do I have poor food, I am expected to play 10 hours of piano and 10 hours of violin consecutiely every single day, and for each mistake I get whipped on the back. The rest of the day is for balancing the food table on my head so that my family can eat, because the floor is so darn dirty they can't eat on it, and the table has no legs to hold it up. At night I'm forced to sleep in the bunkers with the storage boxes everywhere, and the boxes are filled with mousetrap to stall the agents. I have to get the boxes every single time we move, which is very often, and the mouse traps inevitably fall upon me every single time. Chores are not easy at all. While I play piano or violin I have to sweep the floor with teeny tiny sponges and no soap. If my mom spots a single dirty spot she has me punished by forcing me to write a 10,000 word essay in only 15 minutes, and if I don't finish in time, I have to not sleep and instead by more piano and violin, and get triple whips for my mistakes!! :(And at least you have a decent TV show based on you, our TV show is "Bustin' Crime", where you see me bloody all over and can't do anything to stop my family from escaping....And your house doesn't have a bathroom? You'd be glad that your house does not have a bathroom, because I have to clean my bathroom with nothing but myself. I'm not even allowed in the bathroom except for a 10 second interval set by my mother, I have to either go to the nearby scary forest 5 miles away to pee, or I have to hold it in all day and wait until that 10 second interval to go to the bathroom.There's no way my opponent's life is worse than mine. I have a worse life in every way possible.
My life is worse than my opponents

Let's begin with my family. My fourth stepfather is abusive. If I don't win this debate, he will kill me. If I don't do all my chores, he comes to my bedroom, glues a bandaid to my back, and then pulls it off after an hour. One of my stepmoms is a black ginger. She has tainted my blood by even living in my house. If I don't complement her or notice her haircut, she grabs my leg hair, and slowly pulls them off. I have 12 siblings. One of them died years ago. He was a gay, homophobic, black, republican. He had a drug-dealing Mexican girlfriend who took my money for drugs. He, on the other hand, would give me money, and tell me to buy some materials to kill myself. But that's not all. To fit my entire family, we've upgraded to a larger home {1}. I sleep outside. On the way into the house, my siblings must each kick me- in the crotch area. My parents use each of my screams to count how many children are entering the house. When it's warm outside, I have to live on the roof. They don't want the house to get hot, so I live up to to block the sun's heat from getting into the house. I am dark skinned, so I'm close to black. Unfortunately, my other sister is a slave owner on her plantation. I pick cotton for her, and she laughs. My opponent, however, is Asian. He has no right to complain. He's automatically smart, and if that doesn't work out for him, he surely has a career going for him in piano, violen, or ping-pong. When I was a child, each time I lost a tooth, the tooth fairy would come. The Real One. My greedy father would then attack the tooth fairy, steal all of her money, and then deposite her body outside. She woke up without remembering a thing. Are you aware of the TV show: "Two and a half men"? That was modeled off my family after two of my fathers starting filming with my camera, and sold it to the network. They're the two men, but I'm only half man. You wanna know which half of my body is male? The right half. Finally, since my house doesn't have a bathroom, my entire family takes massive dumps on me, and pees into my mouth. At the end of the day, I walk three miles to the closest bathroom, and spit it all out there. I don't get food throughout the day, and my family expects me to live off their waste- if I'm hungry or thirsty... just swallow. There's no way my opponents life is nearly as bad as mine. I rest my case.Thanks. {1} http://www.thedirtydozen.com.au...
Atheism is for morons

1. Weak force is needed for water. There is 40 constants that need to be tuned 2. You dont know that. 3. Then he would've been a lunatic. He wasnt 4. it's a good reason 5. You haven't proved that 6. Nope 7. So you admit they died for truth. You conceded 7 point win for me 8. Already answered in opening statement 11. Yes 12. Is true 13. You claim that the second law only applies to closed systems or isolated systems. But this is false. Dr John Ross of Harvard University (now Sanford) states: " there are no known violations of the second law of thermodynamics. Ordinarily the second law is stated for isolated systems, but the second law applies equally well to open systems. " There is somehow associated with the field of far-from-equilibrium thermodynamics the notion that the second law of thermodynamics fails for such systems. It is important to make sure that this error does not perpetuate itself. [1] 16. So if i see you,that's no proof you exist 17. All historians agree the tomb was empty 18. It shows God did put it inside atheists. 19. He gives a bunch of I dunnos. That's not an answer! He hasnt proved atheism is for smart people like me 1. John Ross, Chemical and Engineering News, 7 July 1980, p. 40; cited in Duane Gish, Creation Scientists Answer their Critics Institute for Creation Research, 1993.
Giants will beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl

.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
Giants will beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl

The Giants will beat the Patriots in the Superbowl because they are currently the hottest team in football. Eli Manning is the "hot" QB now whereas Brady struggled vs top tier defenses this entire season. The Patriots defense was statistically the worst in the league this year. Eli Manning will have Manningham, Nicks, and Cruz open all game. This will open up holes for Ahmad Bradshaw and Brandon Jacobs to run wild. The Giants defense should be able to rough up Brady similar to what they did in 2007. Jason Pierre-Paul, Justin Tuck and Osi will hit and beat up on Tom Brady. The Giants will win a close game
I will lose this debate.

The mere fact that you insulted me does not prove that you are losing the battle. If we calculate the angle to the sun, divided by the sum total of the meaning of life which is 42, and then look at this figure inline with numerology and Roman history. We reach a point of destination which cannot be disputed by any mathematical, or philosophical argument, which proves that which needs to be proved The trick here lies in understanding that at the point when all the stars are aligned we discover the cosmos is actually trying to convey a message, particularly regarding this debate, that in the bigger scheme of things, this debates actually means nothing, as such it would not make sense for you to lose something that has no meaning or no intrinsic value, because how exactly do you evaluate your loss, what factor do you look at. In order for you to lose something it has to exist, looking at things from a wider perspective, taking into consideration that there are about 7billion people and not even 0.1% of those people will ever read this debate, means that subjectively speaking, in the mind of an average person this debate does not even exist. Therefore it is impossible for you to lose it According to a theory by a certain man, who happened to have a mind which conceived the idea i am about to explore. There is a possibility that this reality is in fact a dream. When we die, our brain continues to function for about 7 minutes, therefore there is a possibility that this is all just a manufactured dream, we are all in your head, therefore you cannot lose, because your brain has predetermined the voting, essentially you are arguing against yourself and voting. I know this because i am you, i am an extension of you. We breath the very same air, and eat the very same plants, the sun shines on me in the same light as you, because we are inseparable. Therefore using the 7 laws of attraction, and the audi alteram partem principle we come to the rational conclusion that you haven't proved that you will lose
I will lose this debate.

Already, we can see that my opponent has eloquently pointed out an inherent flaw in my argument, in that I am confusing voters with a paradox. Wonderfully done, Emmo. Wonderfully done. I rest my case. I readily accept my defeat on this basis, but I would like to push it farther to really drive the point home that I am losing terribly.Unlike my civil and courteous opponent, I am going to take the low road and resort to personal attacks that make no sense. Emmo, you're jerk. I bet you mistreat women and do drugs [1]. That's why I'm going to insert a non-sequitur conclusion here: I like steak [2]. But hey, I sourced my comment. Does that put me in the lead? Polls show that no, irrelevant things don't really make a difference [3]. Hence, voters should become confused and question my integrity, further enforcing the sad but true fact that I am getting my a** handed to me. 95% of all Americans agree on this fact that I totally didn't pull out of thin air [4]. This further proves that I am on the losing end of this debate, by a lot.One might argue that by losing, I am in fact winning, but let me make this clear for you: YOUR RONG BECAUSE I SED SO AND TERES NOTING U CAN DO BOUT IT. Are we clear? Fantastic. And believe me, if we were doing this face to face, I would obnoxiously interrupt every statement my opponent makes. PLEASE VOTE TO MAKE ME LOSE, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, I BEG OF YOU!!! If I had a lot of money, I would even bribe you with it. But because I don't, this will have to suffice: I HOPE YOU ALL DIE IN A FIRE[1] BECARSE I SAID SO[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...[3] http://www.korea-dpr.com...[4] Your'e checking sources now? Well F**** YOU!!
I will lose this debate.

Hahahaha! and here we have a conflict, if you do a terrible job and prove that you can lose, then voters have to vote in favor of you, because you support the assertion that you will lose, and if voters vote for you that means you win, and in actual fact the victory should be nullified because you claimed you would lose If on the other hand you prove that you will lose and voters do not vote for you and you indeed lose then that really wouldn't make much sense because you proved that you will lose, therefore the victory should in reality be handed to you
I will lose this debate.

Sometimes, debates aren't about winning; they're about losing, and this is one such debate. Voters are free to interpret the goal of this debate as they wish and may vote accordingly. I have selected Emmo as my opponent because he expressed an interest in debating with me in the comment of another post. My goal is to lose this debate.Throughout this debate, I will argue that regardless of my overall rank, skill, etc. as a debator, I will do a terrible job in this particular debate; my opponent will basically wipe the floor with me. I will list irrelevant sources [1], misspell words [2], and make personal comments [3] that basically make my argument worthless. I will argue from authority [4] and GET REALLY EMOTIONAL OVER THIS SUBJECT MATTER BECAUSE IT'S PERSONAL TO ME, OFMG. By doing so, I hope to successfully demonstrate that seriously, my opponent is kicking my butt. Seriously.Come at me, bro.Sources:[1] Because f*** you.[2] Wut, you hav a porblem?[3] My opponent is a douche.[4] God says I'm gonna lose this one, so there.
The denial of a Palestinian State

Before i continue with my argumentative response, i would like to ask where my opponent is from... To continue, when, this delegate reads a lot of " technically, technically, technically" yes sure technically, but that doesn't support anything, it is just stating that technically Palestine should have there own land, sure technically could my opponent please provide proof that Palestine still exists although it isn't recognized by 2 Arab countries and little terrorist organizations. My opponent, states that Hamas, will be happy when Israel gives them the land back, in 2005 Israel removed 7,000 Israelis by force from the Gaza Strip so that Hamas could stop shooting the rockets. The day it was given back, and the ceasefire was signed, Hamas continued shooting rockets over the boarder. sorry for my short response as i am in the process of a move and have very little time, thank you and i hope my opponent understands
The denial of a Palestinian State

What my opponent fails to recognize is that, if we were to give back land which belonged to everyone else back in history, the whole world would be split up into tiny countries and historical states If i could take me opponent back in time. After world war 2, the English who occupied, the former Palestine, decided and recognized, the state of Israel. if i could explain to my opponent what Zionist is exactly, then maybe it will be easier to understand. a Zionist is someone, that believes in the state of Israel My opponent states that it technically belongs to Palestine, well technically wont cut it, it does or it doesn't, because technically, the Basque region in Spain also Belngs to the Basques I find that they way you defend Palestine and insult the way Israel tortures Palestinians is absolutely a joke, as Hamas, used all Hospitals, and ambulances and turned them into rocket firing positions, and into torture chambers to whom ever decided to refuse the Hamas political party. And might i add what relevance does the Turtore and the HUman rrights violations have with the Denial of the state of Israel? My opponent states that THERE IS a state of Palestine, which officially there isn't. . as Palestine, have tried entering the United NAtions, but as the United NAtions if for nations only their application was denied.
The denial of a Palestinian State

My fellow delegates, the topic of the Israeli Gaza strip is a complicated one. the problem is that its based on history, if we were to allow a Palestinian state, then we would have to allow all the regions in the world stating to have historical countries, the countries.... this would split the world in to many different little countries. Lets say that Palestine get their country back, what will they start off with, on one side, Israel, provides the world with High Tech Technology, Palestine, well they sell carpets.. what would this future state provide for us, other then carpets, which we already have plenty off there fore this delegation is strongly with the fact that there is no such country and never should be as Palestine
C.Ronaldo is better than L.Messi

I am arguing that C. Ronaldo is NOT better the L. Messi. 1) Ok first, Messi has been named one of the "best players" in soccer. 2) Your list of most important things can be debated. You do not have a source saying that those are the most important things so I choose to go by my definition. 3) My definition: In soccer, there is only one thing that matters, scoring a goal. If a team has teamwork, if it has passing, and even if it has control. Do all of these things really matter if the other team can just score goals? 4) Soccer is not judged on whether you can pass a ball or whether you have control. Soccer is judged as to which team has the most goals/points. 5) Just because a player can pass, has control and teamwork, it does not just make the player "good". You have to look at the stats and the last time I checked Messi had better stats than Ronaldo. 6) Your argument about Messi not being able to pass, does not have control or teamwork is invalid. Just because a player chooses not to do those things does not mean he is not capable of doing them. Messi can do all of the things you just listed. He just chooses not to because he is GOOD enough to score a goal on his own.
Plea bargaining in American criminal courts fails to achieve justice.

Because of my partner forfeitting round two, I have nothing further to respond to. Because of this circumstance, I will restate my points along with the resolve and wrap up my case. Main Points RESOLVE: That plea bargaining in American criminal courts fails to achieve justice. When the accused plea bargains, he/she is still being given a punishment that he/she must serve. A person confessing to their crimes and taking responsibility should be taken in account. It should be valuable that someone would HAVE THE CHANCE to get rehabilitated and go back into the world to become a better person. As the con/negative, the Pro has the burden of proof for this debate. The Pro's job was to explain and proove why plea bargaining in american criminal courts fails to achieve justice. The pro's job was not sufficiently done. As a matter of fact, the Pro provided zero support why plea bargaining does not achieve justice. The Pro stated that he/she killed someone, was sent to prison, got a plea bargain instead of life in prison, and escaped prison. The pro's argument was highly irrelevant and the truthfulness was questionable. Because the burden of proof lies with the Pro and they provided no support or relevancy, I ask for readers to vote in favor of the con. :)
Plea bargaining in American criminal courts fails to achieve justice.

I disagree because I killed a man once and I was looking at life, but I got a plea bargain and only got 30 years and now I am out of prison because I broke out. Don't tell anyone though I am in hiding. So I will describe what I did first I killed the man then I ran away. Then I got caught and went to prison. The first thing I did when I got there was dropping the soap. This really sucked. Then I dug with my hands through the wall in my cell and escaped. Now I am talking to you. DO NOT TELL ANYONE THOUGH I DONT WANT TO GO BACK.