Logan Paul Needs to Leave You tube

Firstly, don't call me buddy. It's not in good form for debate and just in general. My opponent has suggested that YouTube has, in some way, deliberately placed Logan Paul's video on trending while actively demonetizing videos of similar nature. This is simply false. YouTube puts nothing on trending. Viewers do. More people watch Logan Paul vlogs than other edgy content, so he shows higher on trending. YouTube did nothing deliberately. It is just what people are watching. I would also like to make a notice that my opponent has not said anything about whether Logan should be removed in his first statement; he has merely stated that YouTube favors money makers. They are a business, whether you like it or not, but that's a different debate entirely and not related to the question of whether Logan Paul should be removed. My opponent agrees with me that Logan is not a kids channel, but states that Logan has a kids audience and thus he should censor himself. While this is true, this does not mean Logan should have to alter his content to a younger age range. That is like saying South Park should be more child-friendly because some 8-year-olds have seen it, despite the fact it is 18+. Technically, he only has to assume that 13-year-olds are the youngest people watching and that their parents are approving of each video they watch. Sure, he ought to be more considerate, and sure what he is doing is not a good thing. But the question we are asking is whether or not he should be removed from YouTube. To determine this, we need to look a YouTube's rules. External morality can be entirely subjective and this debate wouldn't exist in entertainment if we were going on the morality of his actions. It would be philosophical and religious. YouTube's rules allow us to make the assumptions I have listed above and thus the fact that kids watch it has nothing to do with whether his general content should be permitted. My opponent has reminded me that Logan Paul was in Japan at the time of the suicide video. However, I mentioned the suicide as the only exception. In all the countries Logan has been to, Logan has only been to one country in which the freedom of speech was not granted fully (UAE). Therefore, my logic can be applied to all videos not filmed in the Dubai series. So all of those lewd jokes and other relative comments don't matter so long as they are in alignment with YouTubes policies. YouTube says that content that is sexually explicit may be removed. Logan Pauls content doesn't qualify as sexually explicit. It merely qualifies as sexual. There is a large distinction. As for the suicide video. I have never argued that was entailed in his freedom of speech. This is one infraction, and as stated in YouTube's policy, there must be multiple infractions to warrant a termination of an account. A single case of severe abuse can also warrant this as well, but this is not abuse. The suicide video abused what? The dead person's body? No, the abuse has to affect either a person or YouTube itself. The identity of the person is not revealed and the person is not affected because they are dead. The YouTube system has not been abused either. The examples given of a substantial abuse to the system are not comparable with Logan's video. first of all, I see that we both agree that the suicide video he did was stupid, but think it like this: he has broke multiple regulations with that video, and he did not even get a slap on the wrist, no strike, Logan had to take the video down himself because you tube didn't for some reason, It wasn't even Censored for mature audiences, and I will admit that its not Logan's fault for not being punished, he still broke multiple regulations, don't you think he deserves at least a warning? As for the other things that the opposition has mentioned, while they are indeed terrible, they are not violations of YouTube's policies and thus are just irrelevant things my opponent has mentioned to detriment Logan Paul. And while Logan Paul deserves the detriment, the judges should recognize they are still irrelevant. As for 22-year-olds being stupid, there is no other way to say this, but yes they are. 22-year-old males have the highest car insurance rates. Why? Because statistically, they do more stupid things. While it is just a generalization, I believe this applies to Logan as well. The brain does not mature until after 35, that is why the American president must be over 35. To say that 22 years don't frequently do stupid things is naive and absurd. While Logan did indeed edit the suicide video, as I just stated 22-year-olds do very stupid things. He was probably still in shock when editing and lacked proper judgment. A truly terrible ridiculous mistake, for which he has apologized and whether believe it to fake or not has nothing to do with whether he should be removed or not. He has only had one substantial violation and it is not applicable to YouTube's policies for him to be removed. And as for the dog video, I will repeat, while terrible, it is still not a violation of YouTube's policies. And Logan Paul has stated that all of the crazy things he does with his dog are done with proper safety measures. Whether this is true is mute. You cannot assume otherwise because there is no reason to believe otherwise. I end this entry with a final note. Not once did my opponent mention a single violation of YouTubes policy rules other than the suicide video. He can't because there is none. Because there is only one, he cannot be removed because his offense is not in line with the types of major offenses users are removed for.