ROUND TWO: Jesus was a non-smoker

Pro says that I may rebut at will, so I will begin with my arguments. I will be arguing that Jesus may have, indeed, smoked "cigarettes, cigars, cigarillos."1. No Proof that Jesus Didn't SmokeExactly what it says: there is no proof that Jesus was not a smoker. Furthermore, my opponent has not pointed out any reasons why Jesus was not a smoker. There is no verse in the Bible, or in any other historical document or artifact, which confirms Jesus to be a non-smoker.2. Tobacco a Creation of GodAccording to Genesis 1:31, God saw all that He made as being "good". Furthermore, in 1 Timothy 4:4, it reads that "everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving." Therefore, if a cigar, cigarette, or cigarillo was presented to Jesus in thanksgiving, then Jesus would probably not have rejected it.Not to mention, if God sees all that he made as being good, and Jesus is God as per the holy trinity, then Jesus would see tobacco as good, not bad. Meaning, Jesus would have no moral reasons or health reasons to refuse a cigar/cigarette/cigarillo.3. Jesus Approved of a Drug More Dangerous than Tobacco/NicotineNamely alcohol. John 2:7-10 reads, " 7 Jesus told the servants to fill them to the top with water. Then after the jars had been filled, 8 he said, “Now take some water and give it to the man in charge of the feast.”The servants did as Jesus told them, 9 and the man in charge drank some of the water that had now turned into wine. He did not know where the wine had come from, but the servants did. He called the bridegroom over 10 and said, “The best wine is always served first. Then after the guests have had plenty, the other wine is served. But you have kept the best until last!” ."The final verse of this passage implies that this wine was provided to the partygoers after they already were under the influence of alcohol as it was. According to a study mentioned in an article on DailyTech.com, based on societal impact alone, alcohol is more dangerous than tobacco, marijuana, ecstasy, psilocybin mushrooms, crystal meth, powder cocaine, and amphetamines/speed.[1]If Jesus willingly advocated for - and implicitly drank in his lifetime - a drug more dangerous to society than any of these other drugs, then who is to say why Jesus would not have chosen to smoke a cigar/cigarette/cigarillo, which is considerably less dangerous? After all, Jesus was not as concerned about the physical human condition as much as he was concerned about the spiritual human condition, and alcohol is clearly more dangerous to the spiritual human condition than the physcal human condition in comparison to the tobacco and carcinogens in cigars/cigarettes/cigarillos.4. Jesus is Immortal/EternalThis seems irrelavant at first, so please allow me to explain. Cigars, cigarettes, and cigarillos may have not necesarilly existed in bible times, although they certainly do today. It would seem impossible for Jesus to smoke any of these at first glance because of his lifetime on Earth, but, since Jesus is immortal and eternal, he is not bound by time. That said, he could entirely be smoking either of these as we speak in heaven. Bam.Furthermore, Jesus' immortality equates to the impossibility of smoking tobacco causing any damage to his body whatsoever, so Jesus would have no reason not to smoke tobacco, his own creation as per the holy trinity essentially making him God. [1] - http://www.dailytech.com...