Food is a choice PART 2 Electric Boogaloo

I have experienced using food. I have used the substance at times, But I try to use it rarely because of the effects. Food does make you high, And that's why people constantly eat. It is an addiction to eat 3 or 4 times in 1 single day. If you don't get that, Read it ten times over. I said it as a joke to lighten the mood because you seem very upset and heated. You're taking this debate way too seriously. Q1-Thanks for the support! Q2-Organic food can cause leprosy because it rots faster and can take years off your life. I try to avoid organic food at all costs. I am on the con side to the claim "food is a choice. " Read the top of the debate. That has literally been my stance the WHOLE TIME. I have picked a side and you keep telling me that I am switching. I have picked a side, Stop trolling me. 1. Well, How much food do you think we should have in a lifetime? I think we have approximately 20x too much. 2. You are going to lose conduct points for insulting and trolling your opponent you know. . . We wouldn't starve to death if we eased off of it a bit at a time. We just shouldn't go "cold turkey. " Do you have a source that substantiates your claim that "not all food is bad. " Food is a substance that we have failed to keep in check and grown addicted to as a species. We are so addicted to food that we literally need it to live. This has to change. Yes. Because the lawmakers are blatantly ignoring the fact that food kills, And that it has been proven by studies to be the leading cause of death (Source: https://goo. Gl/wz61XW). 4. It wasn't a very good joke, So 1. No, You do not, And 2. I am pro eating food. I am against food is a choice. Read my position. It says "CON. " If you don't know what that means, Please leave the website. 6. I have provided so many sources. Go back and actually look at them. 9. Literally, Whenever you have no argument, You just accuse me of contradiction. I might win this debate from sheer conduct points because no way anyone gives you the conduct vote. You are the one on both sides. Everyone reading this check the old debate. He was con on the old debate and he is pro now. I am purely against food consumption. That is what I have been saying this entire time. 10. Nice conduct, Insulting your opponent's mental health. 11. I will continue to believe you are lying unless you link a source to the quote. Give me a URL so I can work with it. I am probably funnier than you, Considering your point 4. I am happy to accept whatever terms you are imposing here, As long as they are reasonable. I think it is unreasonable to completely switch sides, But maybe since you think it is reasonable, You can convince me? Enlighten me. Real Truth 1. It says I am con on this debate, I do not know why you chose to be pro instead of con. Again, Insulting my intelligence? You are just like mall. Stop trolling me. It is very clear what side I am on and what side you are on. Real Truth 2. I can't look back without a URL, Sadly. Cont. 2. Bad conduct The reason I switched sides was that you thoroughly convinced me of your point, And I switched because I believed in the con side. However, It seems I also convinced you of my point, And that is why you are on the pro side. How unfortunate. We both happened to switch sides because we were both convinced of the others point of view. Yes, I have. Your point? Would be nice if you sent a link ever, Though. What a pathetic defense for offering your opponent drugs. One step away from the "it was a joke" defense. I pity anyone who would use that defense for anything. Oh wait.