P.E.T.A. is wrong

To go on full scale to destroy my opponents arguments: My opponent said: To anyone that thought about it must know where i am getting at. There are still millions of people that are slaves. Is P.E.T.A. ignoring that, and tries to help chickens? Because you know it, no offense, but chickens are stupid. They hate people, but love animals. I bet anyone can read this and understand their position. They don't care about mistreatment, abuse, death, and slavery that people suffer, but they turn to chickens and any other animal to save them from "harm". .Let's not go there though, as anybody with a brain got it. After that wonderful phrase she says, and is also written on their homepage that they want total liberation of animals. Because animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment or abuse. In that case that argument is irrelevant because the topic is only about P.E.T.A not about other slaves. The PETA is all about animals but it's job is not to help people but the people donate to help the animals. if i owned PETA and people donated to me i would only focus on animals because it was what my business is all about. Now going on to my opponents other arguments: He said: Indeed, the P.E.T.A. you probably do not know will ban fishing, dog shows, horseback riding, zoos. They even oppose animals that actually people are in need of like dogs for the blind. I think that blind people totally abuse their dogs by using them as a guide. They even want to prohibit having an animal as a pet, as they say its held captive and not free. But actually is you go to the PETA website link: http://www.peta.org... It says that injure animals should be free and taken cared of so that they get well treated. Not taking away dog helpers and also PETA wants to prohibit animals that are being taken carelessly and being beaten up. The PETA wants to help animals with over 3 million supporters to help with helping hurt animals. My opponents, also said that They say that all animals all around the world should be set free. With rights, come responsibilities. And that's something every P.E.T.A. fan should keep in their mind and never forget. Even if we were to listen to P.E.T.A. and give all animals free rights, they would all end up in prison within a month, no exception. Either for assaulting and committing murder, killing humans or even each other, not paying taxes and even for shitting all over the place. Sorry to be rude, but that's reality. Real life and society is not like Disney World, where the lions hangs out with his body piggy and zebra, and people that support P.E.T.A. either do not know this, or don't understand it. They live in their own little world. But this is easily refuted saying that the PETA only helps animals but considers to have animals set free. But the main purpose that the PETA does is to help animals. Wouldn't you rather save a life? My opponent also says that: Also, the way P.E.T.A. is trying to hypothetically save animals is by harassing people and by acts of terrorism. You might be wandering, but keep on reading. There are P.E.T.A. heroes, that's what they call them, that P.E.T.A. funds (and since PETA is a tax-exempt you know where they get their money from, Americans) that commit arson against animal shelters, and medical facilities. You, American citizen, are paying a bunch of terrorist. Committing arson to get what you want is terrorism. But i quite don't get that because what my opponent means by acts of terrorism is that we are terrorism. That is what my opponent says on his arguments but my opponent also agrees that the PETA is trying to save animals. But my opponent says by harassing but that is not true given that fact by going to the main website, 3 million vole enters supporters that want to donate not by being harassed. Now my opponent also said: That P.E.T.A. is ignoring that and cares about some thousand rats that are born as lab animals. They don't give a crap about the human species, just animals. but first of the main job of PETA is to care about animals and the PETA is only focused on animals not humans. Maybe you saving humans should be in another debate. My opponent also says, Let me give you one of the worst dark little secrets of P.E.T.A. If we take a look at their financial files, some years ago they bought a walk-in freezer, which costed P.E.T.A. ten grand. Walk in freezers are, as we know, used for 2 things. Either for meat, or cadaverous... As Newkirk herself said and i quote: "...sometimes the only kind option for some animals is to put them to sleep forever." P.E.T.A., The People from the Ethical Treatment of Animals kill animals. P.E.T.A. officially claims that they kill about 90-95% of the animals they "save". Since 1998, P.E.T.A. has killed over 27.000 animals in their own Headquarters. Animals that could have been adopted and taken care of. Ingrid Newkirk undoubtedly has had animals be put to death. P.E.T.A. that attacks people that kill, abuse or even embarrass animals, thus they kill animals themselves in their own Headquarters. Hypocrites? I think it's clear now. But no! PETA would never kill animals. Also, please give me a source in which they killed animals Thank you and have a good debate.