No planes were used on 9/11

Video 1: http://www.youtube.com... Assalamualaykum That is Arabic for "Peace be upon you." First, I would like to say, thank you for the reply. This is my first debate on this site, so I put the max number of rounds to be on the safe side. So, onto the debate. I see that you have only went forward to one part of the entire issue, which is not enough. The part that you went forward with was the eye-witness accounts. Now the eye-witness accounts are not enough, for many reasons. And many, if not all, eye-witness accounts, could may as well all be fake. 9/11 was a thing that has been planned, there may as well be 100s, if not thousands of people, behind this terrible incident. The exact numbers, nobody knows. But clearly, this has been an inside job, and with the proof I am about to give, there will be nothing else left than to accept the facts. I will first go over what you had stated. You gave me the first link, and in the first link, it had stated this: "We all know the official story of September 11th: four jetliners were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters, who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence. The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence." That, I call, the 'official conspiracy'. This is the lie the media wants everybody to know. It makes 9/11 a scapegoat, just to invade the middle east, where Al-Qaeda/Taliban are most active. It states that FOUR jetliners were hijacked, by groups of 4/5 'Arabic' men. The WTC's, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. The FBI had compiled a list of the hijackers within THREE days. I am glad you brought this up. If you take a look at video 1, that I have posted above, skip through the video til you get to 2:15, and watch the video on from there, and see that the 'supposed' hijackers were real or not. The video clearly shows you, and provides you the sources, that these hijackers were not real hijackers, if at least 9 of them were found ALIVE. I can quote from all 9 of them, but that would waste space, and all of them are on the video, starting from 2:15. So the FBI are clearly lying here, they have been caught red handed. And let us not get into Osama, because there are many sources, and evidences, that he had died late December of 2001, around 3 months after 9/11. So the first link is nothing more than repeated lies if compared with what the truth actually is. --- So far, I am already seeing many contradictions. You have given me a pile of supposed 'eye-witness' accounts, that mean no value, because of the hardcore evidence that I am about to provide. The only possible explanation for those eye-witness accounts is that, 1) They are faked. 2) They are made up. 3) The people saw something else, highly unlikely though. This is the only possible explanation, and I will continue on, and divide my evidence into sections. --- NUMBER 1: Go to video 1 that I have posted, and watch the beginning. NORAD. I have already given you a brief overview about them. What is your statement regarding the failed response of this military base? NUMBER 2: Go to the same video, skip to 8:30, and watch til the end. Now let us stop at 10:50. What you see, the destruction of the Newton laws of physics. We can ALL agree, that ANY plane, most likely made of aluminum, cannot crash into a STEEL tower, with its NOSE emerging from the other side. This is impossible, completely against the natural laws of this world! In the haste of the moment, the news anchor SAW this fail of a video trickery, and blacked out the scene where the nose 'pops out' from the other side, but he is a few seconds too late, and we can all see, the error in the animation. This again, proves that the plane was an animation, and not a real plane. It possibly could not have been a real plane. If it was a plane, then you have first defied the laws of physics, and I would rather follow the natural laws of this world, than some supposed eye witness accounts. That is not 'tangible' evidence. When you get to 11:50, the uploader of the video is trying to explain to you, that when the plane CRASHED into the tower, and then 'exited' from the other side, it somehow 'bumped' up a few stories somehow. Why? The helicopter, where the tape was being recorded, was obviously in motion, but the 2-D animation of the plane of course remains consistent the way it was animated, so the animation BUMPED up a few stories as the helicopter moved. The video clearly shows how it happened. Again, this is IMPOSSIBLE in reality, but with 2-D animation, it is not. So whoever eye-witnessed that, did they suddenly see a plane lift up a couple of stories as it crashed into the tower? Oh, and did they also see that the plane exited from the other side? Now keep on watching, go to 12:40. The uploader first shows you the 3 step zooming in process. On the final zoom in, the 3rd zoom in, the plane enters into the picture, and then crashes into the tower. But then you see the uploader reverses the tapes, and you can clearly see, there IS NO PLANE. So the animator clearly started the plane animation at the start of the 3rd zoom in, but the animation was non-existent before that. Again, is this some type of GHOST plane? This was 6 seconds before impact, and you are telling me there was no plane visible, until the camera zooms in a little bit more towards the tower? Keep watching the clips over and over, this is straight up visual evidence, aired on local news channels across many parts in America, and possibly outside the USA as well. This is how they have fooled everyone. I want refutations on ALL of these. And I am not finished. At 13:04, a new part starts up, showing the same plane crash from ANOTHER angle. Call this angle B for now. The previous side view angle that the video was showcasing earlier, call that angle A. Now watch this angle B of the plane crash. See the plane coming towards the tower? This is SIX seconds before impact. See how the plane is making a slight decrease in altitude? Now compare angle B with angle A. In angle A, the previous part of the video I was showcasing to you, the plane is going STRAIGHT. There is NO declination. The plane simply goes straight through the towers. This...does not match together. This simply does not match together. I do not believe any such person could have eye-witnessed a forgery. No planes existed, especially the one the video was showcasing to you just now. How can someone eye-witness something so fake? And I am still not done. I am trying to prove to you that this is all a fraud. This is hardcore evidence that those planes simply could not have been 'real planes.' --- I have provided you many reasons why. 1) They are first and foremost, AGAINST the physical laws of this world. You cannot defy them. 2) The multiple angles contradict each other. 3) In the video, it shows the stray pixels of the inserted plane image that has been animated into the video. 4) How is it possible that on a SUNNY day, the clips aired on LIVE television were so dull and dark in color? What happened? Clearly, the tapes have been tampered with. 5) The plane bumps several stories when it crashes into the tower. 6) The plane 'exits' the tower, you can see its nose poke out. This again, is against the laws of physics. I can go on and on, give more evidences, there are MORE videos. But the burden of proof lies upon the one claiming these video clips have NOT been tampered with. So refute so far, everything I had written, I am out of space. Thanks for reading.