Is there a god

Premise one: Information represents objective reality. Premise two: Information existed prior to the first moment of the Big bang. Premise three: Information can only exists within space-time insofar as minds perceive. Premise four: minds are dependent and limited by brains for their existence and function. Conclusion: an absolute mind with unlimited properties was the first cause of the big bang. Premise One: Realism is view point that external things are real and exist independently of mind. Materialism as opposed to idealism is that it is material things that shape our ideas and ideologies. This means that scientific realism is essentially materialism, but realism encompasses many more"ideas than materialism. In contrast, idealism states that ideas come first and then changes in material things are pursued in accordance with those ideas. The question as to whether the universe better represents an Idealistic or realistic world was explored by Brian Whitworth in a 2010 peer-reviewed journal [1]: 1. The objective reality (OR) hypothesis: That our physical reality is an objective reality that exists in and of itself, and being self-contained needs nothing outside of itself to explain it. 2. The virtual reality (VR) hypothesis: That our physical reality is a virtual reality that depends upon information processing to exist, which processing must occur outside of itself. He looked at all the facts we know from experimental data (Just read p.242), and he concluded that the data better fits the idea we are a virtual reality: "This paper links the conjecture that the physical world is a virtual reality to the findings of modern physics. What is usually the subject of science fiction is here proposed as a scientific theory open to empirical evaluation. We know from physics how the world behaves, and from computing how information behaves, so whether the physical world arises from ongoing information processing is a question science can evaluate. A prima facie case for the virtual reality conjecture is presented." Although Brian's paper did not present new scientific results, there are experiments that have demonstrated that his conclusion is true and thus realism is false. In 2012, the "quantum erasure with casually disconnected choice" experiment demonstrated that space-time emerges from information and materialism is indeed"false"[2]: "No naive realistic picture is compatible with our results because whether a quantum could be seen as showing particle- or wave-like behavior would depend on a causally disconnected choice. It is therefore suggestive to abandon such pictures altogether". [1] https://arxiv.org... [2] https://arxiv.org... Premise Two: There are two theories of time: A and B theories of time: An A-theory of time involves a series of temporal positions that continually transform where an event is first part of the future, then part of the present, and then past. The B-theory of time is the other name given to one of two positions regarding philosophy of time. B-theorists argue that the flow of time is an illusion, that the past, present and future are equally real, and that time is tenseless and changeless rather than tensed. This would mean that temporal becoming is not an objective feature of reality. B-theory is often drawn upon in theoretical physics,[1] and in theories such as eternalism." https://en.wikipedia.org... What implications does this have for cosmic origins? If we assume an A-theory of time and realism is true, then a "before" the big bang is meaningless obviously because time did not exist and thus the universe did not exist. However, if B-theory is true" and information processing represents objective reality , then we can discuss what happened "before" the big bang"because experiments on materials in the present"can determine what happen to"those materials in the past. For example, the wave-function or the singularity/initial boundary"point"operates under this theory of time where the total energy of the universe is zero but"it is not made up of space-time, matter,"or energy. As Brian Whitworth has alluded to in the same paper: "If the universe is a virtual reality, then its big bang creation could be simply when the system was booted up. Deriving core physics from information processing could reconcile relativity and quantum theory, with the former how processing creates the space-time operating system and the latter how it creates energy and matter applications. " Premise Three: There are two different types of causal interactions in nature: antecedent causation and simultaneous causation. Antecedent causation is where every event precedes another event in time because they are material causes that operate under our classical space-time dimension. On the other hand, simultaneous causation is what only minds produce because they are spaceless timeless immaterial causes where the cause exists with the effect inside the same event . For example, experiments in neuroscience have demonstrated that humans experience a B-theory of time rather than an A-theory of time: "In conclusion, subjective time appears not to be a single entity; instead, it is made up of different timing mechanisms, such as flicker perception and duration perception, which generally work in concert but are separable." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... According to other studies, humans have the ability to affect their brains "by voluntarily changing the nature of the mind processes unfolding in the psychological space": https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... Another study showed the same thing where "the changes made at the mind level, within a psychotherapeutic context, are able to functionally 'rewire' the brain": https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... Lastly, our subjective experience of interacting with other people's faces ,has been shown by a study, to modify the face perception neurons in the receiver's brain: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... Premise four is an obvious fact and thus the conclusion follows. The God Hypothesis If my hypothesis is true, then we should find certain aspects of the universe that show how this mind possesses consciousness, awareness and personal identity or selfhood. Moreover, we should find other aspects that show how this mind is uncaused or eternal, all-power, all-knowing, and all-present. In the next round, I will address objections and scientifically confirm my philosophical conclusion.