The Theory of Evolution is a lie and We did not come from monkeys.

I want to begin by discrediting my opponent's source. First of all, it's a freewebtown address. Freewebtown is a personal website builder where you can post anything to your heart's content. The .com site my opponent posted has no scientific sponsors yet makes scientific claims. My opponent's source: http://www.freewebtown.com... The freewebtown website: http://www.100best-free-web-space.com... A website I made myself (just for my opponent *winks*): http://www.freewebtown.com... Secondly, I would like to add that my opponent provided me with none of the evidence that I specifically asked for. He avoided my questions and tossed my evidence aside as if it were a chocolate bar wrapper. Therefore, all my evidence stands. Now to the argument: ""Great, it's no wonder why you observe macroevolution, you get to determine what a "kind" of animal is in the first place! you set it up with genus, phylum, and whatever. Just show me a fish turning into a man and then we'll talk." A real life fish you can find today in Australia that has land animal qualities: a Lung fish. http://www.nature.com... "Creationists often note that "observation" is a step in the scientific method but neglect to mention that it refers to the initial observation of some situation that needs explanation (say, the diversity of species on earth today). Explaining those observations involves forming a hypothesis and testing its implications with evidence, which does not require literally watching something with eyeballs." (A) Proof of observations, because your faulty site just didn't get it right. This should also count towards my evidence of evolution: Cosmic evolution: Researches at the esteemed University of Chicago have conducted a cold dark matter model which explains the distribution of galaxies in the universe. Their observations were compared to current observations and matched excellently. (1) NASA's Hubble telescope has created a 3D map that shows, in large scale, the distribution of dark matter. " This milestone takes astronomers from inference to direct observation of dark matter's influence in the universe." The map was created using Hubble's largest survey of the universe, COSMOS. The Hubble's observations were combined with powerful ground based telescope's observations. (2,4) Observations of supernovas, such as Shelton 1987, that was discovered immediately after its light waves reached earth. The observations of Shelton 1987 through the time span it developed were critical to observing how supernovas form into dwarf stars and or black holes. (3) Just yesterday the Hubble discovered the missing baryons substances that make up the excess matter of the universe. They are the backbone of the universe, and now with their discovery, scientist can observe how "Baryonic matter forms stars, planets, moons, and even the interstellar gas and dust from which new stars are born." (5) Chemical evolution: Faraday discussion 133, "The meeting focused on recent astronomical observations of molecules in various regions and eras of the Universe, and on describing the processes that determine the chemistry. These processes include gas phase neutral exchanges and ion-molecule reactions, surface reactions on dust grains, and the radiative processing of dirty ices." (1) The replacement of one crystalline phase by another http://www.cosis.net... (2) Experiment conducted to show chemical composition of the atmosphere during prehistoric earth and the experiments observations. It was sustainable and also created "proteinoids" in the process. (3) Stellar and Planetary evolution Again, I can site here the baryonic matter found by the Hubble. (1) Scientists are watching the development of the youngest supernova ever found, and in our very own milky way. She is named Chandra. Direct observation of stellar evolution. (2) Organic Evolution I can again site the experiment conducted to show chemical composition of the atmosphere, resulting in "proteinoids." (1) Observations have been made that humans are poorly equipped to walk upright, horse have "splint" bones, the appendix in humans is a very nice example, and even whales having hips. (2) "Five major forms (lamellar, banded, crack-like, disseminated and segregated encrustation) of organic matter distribution in source rocks have been revealed under scanning electron microscope by using the heavy metal staining technique. The degree of organic impregnation is related to the amount of liquid hydrocarbons in the rocks, and from this relationship a rough estimation of organic matter can be made on the basis of electron microscopic observations. In conjunction with experimental studies it has been found that the distribution forms of organic matter are a function of its maturity in the process of thermal evolution and accordingly some microscopic criteria can be developed for the assessment of source rocks." (3) And last but not least... Macro-Evolution: "The honeysuckle maggot fly has recently been found to have directly arisen from a hybridization between the snowberry maggot fly and the blueberry maggot fly. In 1905, in his patch of Oenothera lamarckiana, Hugo de Vries discovered an unusual specimen, and found that he was unable to crossbreed it with its parent-plants. He later named it O. gigas, and found that it had 2N=28, while its parent had 2N=14. It is a known scientific fact that all plants on planet earth evolved from oceanic cyanobacteria, which gave rise to algae, which in turn gave rise to mosses, which began the process of transitioning from aquatic plants to land plants. Once this transition was made from the water to the land, diversification and speciation gave rise to all the land plants which exist today. This is a prime example of macro-evolution, although it did occur some 3 billion years ago and continues on to the present." (1,2,3) We also have an exquisitely complete series of fossils for the reptile-mammal intermediates, ranging from the pelycosauria, therapsida, cynodonta, up to primitive mammalia. (4) Carbon 14 dating: This is an extremely old argument that has been debunked already. Because I'm running out of characters and need to refute the rest of your argument, here is the exact argument you made and the scientific rebuttal http://www.talkorigins.org... "Ok fine, so you can name a few mutations, do they make a human become a different species? No." Yes it does. If there are enough mutations, then the two groups of humans divided by environment (like mountain range) can not mate. Of course, our evolution isn't as dramatic now a days because we do not have these huge environmental rifts. "Genetics? Of course we share similar genes with animals, WE CAME FROM THE SAME GOD! duh! dumb athiests…" Ad hominem, Straw Man (And how does that make sense? Do explain and don't avoid explaining it in your next argument, please.) And you misspelled atheist again. And the last bit against the geological column...one word... erosion. They take it into account. Please research actual geology before attacking it with a .com site. Regards, Vi Post note: My sources will be in the comments as I do not have enough characters to accommodate them all in post.