Arguing over things you can not prove or disprove is useless.

Well, first I would like to try to negate the second use by saying that we can prove skill people prove skill every day playing video games or running track or playing sports it can be proven by the winning person or debate the person who won is clearly more skillful. You kind of contradicted yourself I think in your second argument. In a matchup between two debaters on a topic where there is no definitive right or wrong, who wins and loses the debate turns into who can craft the better arguments and rebuttals and who has a better ability to research topic literature. That's why real-life debate tournaments aim to have topics that aren't slanted in any way toward one side or the other: remove the provability or disprovability of a topic, and the winner becomes who does the better job debating, not who is ultimately right.clearly the person who wins is more skillful.even though not right they are more skillful at debating. Now the first use probability. Now lets say I have a coin and flip it with two people watching it land on heads the person who called heads is excited because he won but the second says it landed on tails and a third person unbeknownst to everyone else was watching and said it landed on the edge of the coin now lets fast forward a few thousand years there has been cults made out of these three people and what they said happen most people believe the third guy who said it landed on the edge but they are hated on by the other two groups the heads and the tails most people believe that it landed on the edge of the coin those people believe all three groups are right in that if it landed on the edge then it would have also landed on the heads and the tails sides because it would have been balanced on both sides the other people say that they are right because the probability of it landing on the edge is very very very unlikely and then one of my descendants come in and say that I never flipped the coin and then everyone stops and thinks for a bit hey why are we arguing over what a coin landed on to begin with it has nothing to do with our lives or anyones but now it does they have spent their whole lives arguing over which is right and wrong that they have come to a way of thinking that is slanted towards what they were brought up to think/believe. The point here is that it is not the events or the probability of things that make things important people make things important. People make things matter like horoscopes or what color your skin is or any little thing could be blown up to be important. And you said.“But the God debate is entirely relevant to our everyday lives in how we act and what we do, so discussion of such is entirely relevant. If we decide that God probably exists, our actions are more likely to align in accordance to a life where God did exist, rather than if God didn't exist. So even if we can't prove definitively that God exists, we can prove something probably exists or probably doesn't exist, and go from there.”I know the god debate is relevant, but why is it relevant without peoples' initial belief in it it would have never gotten to be a mainstream religion and may have never been relevant people believe in it because they were taught to believe in it. People control their own lives and have a lasting effect on others over things that people perceive as important and yet they may have never happened or they are not important at all. People make things relevant and what people make relevant may or may not even be based on any facts at all."we can prove something probably exists or probably doesn't exist, and go from there."Go where from there we still dont know anything we dont know if it actualy exists or not. “There are certain things that are impossible to prove or disprove, but we argue whether they probably happened or not to give us insight into how we believe the world around us probably works.” Yes but why do we argue over things that have no basis of proof that have no real basis or root in history I mean I would be more likely to believe my coin story 1000 years from now instead of some ideas some other people have today of what happened thousands of years ago or billions of years ago without them being there to witness it and claiming to know what happened.