Capitalism destroys our world, communism is better

Maybe capitalism does not do away with core values, but they go unrewarded. In a communist society they would be the key of your life, thus improving both yours and the life of your companions. Yes, private companies control the market. And yes, in capitalism governments should protect the people from these companies. But that is not what's happening right now. Countries are no longer controlled by states or governments but by companies. The companies who exploit workers for their own good, and then go around influencing the government which is supposed to protect these workers from them. Yes capitalism allows for people to create more things good for humanity. But if a company has a choice between creating something good for mankind or good for their financial situation what is it gonna pick? You do reward innovaters, simply not with money. What is a better feeling? Getting paid 2000 dollars for your idea, or have the people know it's your idea and feel thanked and honoured by an entire society? I'd pick the latter. Public opinion and fame can be as much a goal as money, and the difference is that you can't exploit people for fame. The great problem is the voice of the people. You say they will vote someone out if they want to, but they won't. They will vote for a demagogue. Someone who makes a lot of empty promises. Do you really agree the people are in control of the market? If you try to start a fair corporation you will not be able to compete with the giant corporations all housing in the Cayman Islands. You won't. And yes they will sell their products cheaper, for the simple reason that they're produced at a lower cost. They exploit their workers in Asian countries and you as an honest American businessman can not compete. The economic power in hands of the people is an illusion. Where would Steve Jobs be in a communist state? Well he would go with his ideas to the factories telling them he invented something. These factories would produce his ideas and the new technology would spread. The only difference would be that he would not become incredibely rich, but he'd become thanked and honoured. The collective is placed above individual freedom? Yes it is. Why would you as an individual be in charge of your land? Why is it your land? Because some ancestor once said this is mine? Is that really what defines our property? The whole idea of it is absurd. If someone proposed you to buy a plot of land on the moon, you'd declare him crazy. The moon is not his to sell. There are no owners. Then why are there owners of land? Land is not divided by nature. There are no supernatural borders defining where one plot ends and the next begins. So why do we implement these boundaries? Because at some point in time someone said this land is mine. And we all accepted it was because at that time there was enough for everyone. But land shortage became a real problem, and both peaceful transition, through buying, as war became real. We are waging war with one another because we want to defend something that isnt even ours? Therefore I say no more property. We don't need to claim a place for our own. Everything we need can and will be provided by our community. What is succes? Personal wealth? Then yes, communism will no longer know people rise to succes. Good for humanity? In that case, communism will succeed far better in letting people have succes than capitalism. As my last argument, Communism is based upon equality, one of the most beautiful ideals. It rewards the good and helps everyone in your city by allowing free healthcare and free everything. In contrast, Capitalism charges the ones who have less even more than it charges the ones who have a lot. The distance between wealth and poverty increases beacause of it. In capitalism you are rewarded for greed, in communism you are punished for it. In what society do you want to live? I made my choice.