Communism is better, in general, than Capitalism

As stated in the rules, I may only attack one of my opponents rebuttals. But I do urge voters to count how many times my opponent has rushed to conclusions and misread the conclusions I made throughout the debate. For the attacks I do not directly address, please make sure the logic he uses is rationally satisfying before voting. Also, he did not follow the rules, as he attacked my rebuttals in round 3, which I was incapable of doing. (It's also incredibly ironic, because this was the factor that made me tie with him in our previous debate). ""Actually, Capitalism in its least socialist form is the breeding grounds of corruption. (1) It is also a great way to exploit the poor, via Tenant farming (2) and Discrimination. (3)"First, I have to point out that we are talking for the majority of the people. During the late 18th century, there were only 650 000 slaves while the population was 4 million (1). Therefore, it was still better for the majority at that time. Capitalism promotes free choice. As a result, tenant farming and poor exploitation is all a choice; which the poor people choose for themselves. The poor person does not have to abide by those exploitations. Communism on the other hand does not promote free choice. Everybody's lives are chosen before they are born. There is no moving up classes or being "promoted" in society. "I hope nobody who reads this interprets as me insulting my opponent, but with what he has said he has shown a profound ignorance of what tenant farming is and why people subjected themselves to it. For example, after the 13th Amendment, slaves were free and needed to get a job so they could start earning money and supporting themselves. But these slaves still were in the south. Most people still hated them, and didn't want to give them jobs. So some clever land owners realized they (the former slaves) were starving to death, so they rented land to them so they could produce crops and sell them. Two problems emerged: The rent was higher than a successful harvest, and nobody wanted to buy their crops. Thus, since the slaves were in financial debt, they had to stay to pay their debts, but they couldn't generate enough money to pay for the rent due that month anyways, and ended up in a viscous cycle that they could not escape without (socialist) intervention. My opponent doesn't attack the first part of my statement, so I have to assume he is agreeing with me. He also rambles Communism and free choice, which doesn't really have anything to do with corruption or exploitation of the poor. I addressed this issue in a different part of my rebuttals. Final ConclusionMy opponent has repeated the same arguments my history teachers have told me since I was in the 6th grade. I have provided adequate answers to these arguments, and he simply repeated them back to me in his third round. He also broke the rules regarding the contents of round 3. I do not expect my voters to agree with me on this debate; I'm not sure if I even agree with me, but you (the voters) need to at least accept that my arguments, conduct, sources, and (in my opinion) spelling and grammar were superior to my opponents.