Is Jesus the Son of God in a literal sense or in a figuratively way

Jesus sinner You lied about the prophets when you said this R32;Con: First I have to state that Prophets in Islam are sinless, they can make mistakes like normal human beings, but cannot do things which God forbade like drinking wine, or gambling, I will present a decisive rebuttal.R32; ^Con says the prophets were sinless. Do you even know what sin is ? commit a sin. )R32;In in fact Con says they are sinless to pull the wool over our eyes to make room for the lies he will bring. R32;Islam comes from a pagan back ground so the sin and Satan thing isn't all the way developed in your belief yet. Even your hadiths talks about the sins of the prophets in which you said they were sinless in (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 93, Number 507 Psalm 14:3 / R32;They have all turned aside; together they have become corrupt; there is none who does good, not even oneR32;So no they weren't sinless God helped them become holy and repented. No man is sinless as the Quran your own book says. Jesus says it also they have said it themselves. Sahih Bukhari Volume 8: #s 335, 379, 407, and 408, [1]. Muhammad knew clearly he was a sinner; thus he m This was just your opinion. R32;R32;R32;R32;R32;R32;R32;R32; Pertaining the Isaiah sayings of Messiah R32;Jesus called everlasting Father and God. Second Part of the trinity basically. R32;Isaiah 9:6 For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. By the way you just got the prophet Isaiah calling Jesus God so I don't need to spill out the name of Clark Kent cause his identity is to be kept secret with those who are close to him . Jesus Christ is God being the Clark Kent and super mans unity(figuratively speaking ) Now I provided that prophet Isaiah for you whom called Jesus God.R32;dead sea scrolls is found which is the oldest scriptures of the bible. Older than all books we found plus way older than Quern. That even Isaiah says Messiah is God being then Islam is wrong based on old document older than the Trinitarian name. So I'm happy to present to you why we call Jesus the son and everlasting Father not Heavenly Father. By the way we have many Fathers in life many for fathers Jesus is the Father of our faith and salvation ... that's what it means when it calls Jesus in that sense Father. Pro: OK soak this up God willing this is logic one on one. So apply your self to every writing I say to you. You may become Christian one day. Pro: You mentioned Jesus didn't claim to be from God in this. You said , //To answer you easily, " Seems a Prophecy fulfilled, here is 2 ways I can refute this, before I do, Matthew 1:23 does not say Jesus came from the father, so Pro was confused, nor It says Jesus is everlasting."//R32; Pro: It says Jesus came from God by Jesus words here in John,R32;John 8:23 But he continued, "You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world Pro: John 3: 13No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven"the Son of Man.(Son of Man he hints to them because the Christ was seen going to God and God giving him power by the eyes of prophet Daniel. Daniel sees this Messiah and he happened to be a Son of mankind's form going to God. This is why Jesus played with the words by saying Son of Man.) Pro:John 3: 17 For God did not (send his Son into the world) to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. R32; Love you Con regardless of you misunderstanding. I'm here to get you straight and right. Ask you shall receive the gospel like the Ethiopia Eunuch and the Apostle Philip. R32; My Next rebuttal of what you brought up was this , Con: "This is a sign from the Lord to Ahaz, therefore Matthew was mistaken in 1:23, and 'The virgin' was supposed to be a 'young woman', because it also means that according to the footnote of the NIV.R32;D. Isaiah 7:14 'Or a young woman."R32; Pro : Let's begin with the fact that you did not quote the whole thing of the Isaiah prophecy.R32;Even if it only said young woman or if it said virgin doesn't matter in this case because the whole context is what matters. In the context it says that this he'll be called Emmanuel which means (God)with men. So at the end of the day you can be sure that this little child called God with man which we have believed and the Jews know also that this is the Son of God the Christ. You have a problem with it because Islam is Antichrist (against the Son of God) why do you think in the Bible there will be a bunch of enemies fighting against Jesus when he returns ? Its because Satan has given you his Jesus. The non son prophet Jesus is not the historical Christ. As the con said that when he debated you earlier in the Islam is the truth debate .R32; So what do we have here we see that you can't quote something and leave the rest of the contexts out. That's how you mistake that Muhammad is in the Bible by not reading the whole context. We Christians we Jews know that Satan quotes things out of context because he's trying to send the seed of God to the birds as Jesus said in a parable. Next rebuke you said was Con:R32;"Proverbs 30:4 R32;I have showed you some of the passage with the context "4 Who has gone up to heaven and come down?Whose hands have gathered up the wind? Who has wrapped up the waters in a cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and what is the name of his son? Surely you know!"R32;I have told you that Jesus did not do the above which going down from the heaven, gathering the wind,etc, therefore it is not Jesus being described here, it is sayings of Agur the son of Jakeh.(Proverbs 30:1)" Before I begin to refute your interpretation This verse proverbs 30:4 talks about God the Father and Jesus the Son of God whom is "his son surely you know?" "What is his name, and what is the name of his son" Horrible horrible understanding of this verse when it is very plain. You're making the argument that Jesus haven't grabbed all of the winds and thus this whole passage is not mentioning Jesus at all. Note these are two people. Read it. The verse says the (his) is meaning that this is Jehovah God ,the Heavenly Father. It says son meaning that whoever this (his) is has a son Jesus. Simple things, simple thing. And audience you need to know the only reason why he couldn't get that is because Islam forbids a son of God so therefore the way that he lives in speaks will be son less. I made a rap verse in one of my reps on iTunes and it said, "You not messing with a son like a fake tan." I'm sorry I know I have already proved this but I love to pick on the smallest parts that seems to be incorrect. You said something about Agur ,here Con: "I have told you that Jesus did not do the above which going down from the heaven, gathering the wind,etc, therefore it is not Jesus being described here, it is sayings of Agur the son of Jakeh.(Proverbs 30" Pro: So if I'm not mistaking you just said that this Agur has gathered the winds up with his hands? ^Your logic. R32; Con: said I had type errors and misspellings true. This is my first time on this website and I'm using a cell phone for god sake and I'm debating so I don't have all the fonts and the underlining that you have.R32; Addressing the interpolations of the bible. Con:R32;Let us examine some verses of the R32;Bibles, to prove that Jesus being a R32;literal Son of God wrong. KJV JOHN 3: "16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." R32;KJV was made in 1611 [1]R32;Let us see a modern Bible like NIV:R32;"16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." Pro: catch this Quern says that there is no begotten Son of God which is including and only. Did you notice the translations always mentioned the only Son of God regardless if begotten wasn't or was there.R32; Now the job of translation is to get across the point but you don't get the point of the Bible. It simply says God has an only son as we discussed and proverbs chapter 30. So begot or none beget it still says only son. You proved it. Now that's awesome. If you don't understand what translation and versions is yet I will explain. What the translation is like it is like saying hello what's up howdy Salam. All these are translations of greetings. All said the same thing in a different way. R32;So also it is when they are trying to betray Jesus being the only Son of God begotten or without the word beget, we get the point he's God's only son of God. You find a begotten son forbidding in the prophets then you have won this debate but if in scriptures that God has a son then you're incorrect literal or not literal because your God has no Son at at all.R32;R32;And I quote Allah not Jehovah God. Quran 6:101. He is the Originator of the heavens and the earth. How can He have children when He has no wife? He created all things and He is the All-Knower of everything. Muhammad was a carnal thinker as those who argued with Jesus. Cause surely God can have a literal or figurative Son he created the family system. Unless your God is a barren God. My God can do all things Jeremiah 32:17R32;"