God is Black

Thank you.1. Definition of GodI'll accept the definition of God that my opponent provided, "The creator of all things". 2. Rebuttal"God" would need to not only assume but possess the quality (s) suitable"I agree with my opponent's statement that in order for God to be the creator of all things, He must possess the qualities necessary in order to be the creator of all things. But what are these qualities? There seem to be a few obvious one, such as all-powerful (in order to create all things), transcendent (in order to exist outside of the space and time which He himself would have created), etc. However, I see no reason to think that the quality of having a color is necessary in order to be the "creator of all things". I invite my opponent to bring forward some kind of reasoning for thinking that this is a necessary quality of God. "And if we assume that "God" lives in and/or is a part of all things it creates, then logic would assume the supreme representation of God to be Black in both metaphorical and literal terms."I'm not sure what my opponent is getting at here. I'm also unsure if I'm willing to assume that God "lives in and/or is a part of all things it creates".3. ArgumentsIn my rebuttal, I concluded that there is no reason to think that possessing color is a quality that is necessary for God. Far from this idea being necessary, I would argue that it is not reasonable to think God possesses color at all. This argument can be summed up in the following manner:P1) God is the creator of all things.P2) Color falls into the category of "all things".C1) Therefore, God is the creator of color.My opponent has already shown that he/she agrees with the first premise because the first premise is the very definition of God provided by my opponent. The second premise is self-evident; nothing can exist outside of "all things". The conclusion that God is the creator of color then logically follows. But, if God is the creator of color, then he clearly could not possess color Himself. In order for God to possess color, color (or the lack of color, if we're referring specifically to black) would need to have existed prior to God's creating it. This is, of course, absurd. Furthermore, it seems to me that God, if we take him to be transcendent (existing outside of space and time) cannot possibly possess color (or the lack of color). Only material objects possess color or the lack of color. This argument can be summed up in this way:P1) Only material objects can possess the quality of being black.P2) God is not a material object.C1) Therefore, God cannot possess the quality of being black.In order to deny the first premise, my opponent must give some kind of reasoning for thinking that immaterial objects can possess the quality of being black. Suggesting that God is black is as absurd as suggesting that the number 7 is red or that truth is blue. The only other way to reject the conclusion that God cannot possess the color of being black would be to assert that God is a material object. But this contradicts the definition given by my opponent. If God is himself a material object, then He cannot have created the material world.4. SummaryIn his argument, my opponent asserted that the quality of having color (or lack of color) is necessary for God. My opponent failed to provide any sort of justification for this assertion, and as such we have no reason to take it to be true. I provided two arguments of my own in order to show the absurdity of God having color (or lack of color). As my opponent is responsible for carrying the burden of proof in showing that "God is black", he/she must refute each of the two arguments I presented and provide some kind of argument or reasoning of his/her own in order to win the debate.