Science is not against catholic religion: the blood of Jesus Christ case.

I wont extend myself on the question of the goal of science and his neutrality since it is not the subject. The point of the debate is to affirm that modern science can give some evidence about the veracity of the catholic religion. Of course I am not stating that science will affirm or deny the truthness of this religion since science it is just a field of human knowledge and science needs to be combined with other disciplines such as history, theology, philosophy etc in order to find the truth. However, what can science brings us in this case is some facts. These facts alone are not enough to assert something it will be the interpretation of these facts that can give us some clues. So in this debate I will use science as providing some facts that I will use to come to a conclusion by interpretatating them. Concerning the blood found in relicsMy opponent seems to concede that the blood on the relics of Jesus Christ is AB+ blood type. However, I will still provide some sources about the studies that were done. The blood on the shroud of Turin was confirmed to be AB blood type by scientist Baima Bollone[1]. The blood on Oviedo shroud had the same result[2] and we also have the same blood type in the analysis of the Holy Tunic[3]Concerning the AB+ blood type AB+ blood type is one of the rarest type of blood in the world. If we compare the articles about this matter we find that the prevalence of population with this type of blood in the world range from 3% to 5%[4]. Conclusion on the relics The blood match on the relics doesn't prove at 100% that the blood comes from the same person. Only a DNA test would provide such an evidence. But, we can say that these relics passed the blood test, in the case of different blood type found we could for sure say that these relics wouldn't come from the same person. Furthermore, given the rarity of AB+ blood type the match found on these relics make it likely that it was the same person since otherwise it would be a great coincidence. Application to the general truthness of catholic religionI will concede that even if the relics are indeed from Jesus Christ, that doesn't prove by itself that the catholic religion is true since we can affirm that Jesus Christ really existed but he was only human and not God. That's why I will come to part 2 of my reasoning. Con only talked about the relics but not the eucharistic miracles. About the eucharistic miracles The eucharistic miracles are a host turning into blood or human tissue. Some natural phenomenons can someone give the confusion of host turning red to be blood but the church is well aware of that and have refused some allegedly miracles because it was just from a natural cause, in the case of Utah bleeding host for example[5]. The Lanciano miracle in 700 was analysed by Professor Linoli he stated that the tissue found in the host was some fresh blood with no conservation agent found and that it was human tissue with blood typed AB+. He published his finding in a medical review[6]. Same thing happened in Buenos Aires in 1996 with a miraculous host. The case was conducted by our actual pope (Pope Francis) and a fragment was sent to a laboratory and AB blood, tissues were conservated and not decayed etc. [7]. There were other recent miracles like them such as Polish one. Conclusion: The fact that these miracles share the same blood types, that also match the blood types on relics makes it unlikely that this is a hoax of the catholic church. The lack of deterioration given that dead human tissue usualy decay fast and other specific thing such as the fact that ' “Even the scientists of NASA, who have at their disposal the most modern analytical techniques, would not be able to artificially recreate such a thing” affirmed Professor Sobaniec-Łotowska stating about the fact that 'the cardiac tissue was joined to the consecrated host in an inseparable manner'. I can say that science should deepen the subject and make some DNA test in order to see if it is really the same person. Sources 1) . https://www.researchgate.net...2) . https://www.nytimes.com...3) . http://www.radio-silence.tv...4) . https://owlcation.com...5) . https://cruxnow.com...6) . https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...7) . http://www.therealpresence.org...