Jesus Is Black!

"I"m not here to start racial tension or anything" You sure? Because: How did the Hebrews turn White"the histories of White people"should all become White"White people decided"that Whites could not"process of Whitinizing Blacks"because Whites destroyed "when Whites were destroying"when Whites did have control"when Whites rather than simply destroy"look like White people"then proudly display them as proof of the White mans greatness".look like White people"if Jesus can be White"exported her White Americanized Savior""White Christ" appear in European art"the White Christ now""Whiteness" took on a new significance"that sacred whiteness"white Jesus promised a white past, a white present, and a future of white glory".ideas of whiteness".The beloved White Jesus" Unfounded statements like this repeated over and over tend to give off the impression that you hold a disdain towards white people. Especially since this debate has NOTHING to do with white people. "Seeing as how it only takes three generations to turn a Black person into a White person (and visa versa)." None of Jesus' recent ancestors were black, and even if his ancient ancestors were sub-saharan, by PRO's logic it wouldn't matter, and Jesus still wouldn't be considered black. This reasoning negates PRO's entire claim. "The pictures below depicts Jesus as a black" Depictions are not enough. If I could provide 100 pictures of a blond haired blue-eyed Jesus would that make him so? This information is not evidence of a black Jesus. "the Persian Empire, which was itself a Black Empire." A wild assumption, since Persia was centered in what is now known as Iran, of which is most definitely not what anyone would reasonably consider a "black empire". "The Islamist side-stepped the entire issue by forbidding imagery of any kind." You'd do well to go read the second of your god's commandments. "he probably looked a great deal more like a dark-skinned Semite than Westerners are used to seeing" A dark skinned Semite is a middle easterner, and middle easterners aren't considered black. "Check these latest images from bbc depicting jesus as black breaking news" Neither of these two links have anything to do with the BBC, and are obviously slanted. The first sentence of the first link is "Golly Gee!" for crying out loud. They have no citations and hold no merit. "Christ came for the tribe fo Judah which was one of Jacob's twelve sons." Of which were all Israeli, not African. "His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; and his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters." Are we to believe that a symbolic description of a man two thousand years dead is evidence? "No one is white or black but so called black people are shades of brown and so called white people are shades of red." This sentence proves my opponents ignorance on the subject. We have definitions of what is considered black, and Jesus does not fit this definition. I would like the voters to consider that my opponent did not counter a single point from my opening argument and only provided two (faulty) sources that were not what he claimed them to be. All of my points stand, and PRO has failed to establish evidence in his 3rd round that Jesus was black. Thanks for reading