Europe is Superior to the U.S

Premise I: Europe Vs European Countries.Pro is mistaken as to what my Premise means. It means that she can not show that because Nation A has less crime and Nation B has higher wages (Although no European Nation has higher average wages), that Europe has less crime and higher wages. She misrepresents my case here.Premise II: Relativity.Pro assumes that because statistics and arguments matter, that she can objectively prove Europe is better. This is not true. As I have mentioned, most of her arguments are relative, and even if they weren't, that doesn't make them equal. If a Conservative concerned himself with Politics more than Culture, and I lost the Culture argument, the fact that Pro stated Europe was far more Liberal, I'd still win in the Conservative's eyes. If a Liberal was more concerned with Education than Politics, and I win Education but lose Politics, I'd still win. When weighing arguments of who/what is better, the voter decides. Two people may have the same opinion, and one be happy and the other sad with their country because of how they wiegh their opinions.Who is voting determines which categories matter more. As well as their opinions (Conservative, Liberal, Christian, etc...) This is because the matter is still largely Relative.Some arguments that are relative; Liberal Politics v Conservative Politics. Freedom from Government v Freedom from Companies. Culture.Lifestyle and Economics are largely the only objective arguments here.Rebuttal I: Lifestyle.Pro again repeats that the US has numerous health issues and so these must be intrinsic. This is false causation. Since the health issues are not caused by being a US Citizen, it is intrinsic to the personal habits of each citizen, and not to the US. Unless being a US Citizen causes these health issues, it's not intrinsic to the country itself. Pro could spend a decade in the US, and not face these issues, because they are personally caused, not nationally caused.The number of Doctors isn't important. More =/= better. In fact, the Waiting Lists in Europe are massive in comparison to the US. While in the UK, around 21% of curable lung cancer patients become incurable while on the wait list (1). In the UK, the majority of patients wait over four hours to see a doctor (2) compared to the average of less than an hour in the US (3). Waiting lists in Europe are generally dangerously high compared to the US (4). US patent are barely aware a waiting list exists (5). Despite Pro's claims, the US has substantial access to doctors. Cost of healthcare is also not relevant unless it proves to be dangerous to living here. In reality, higher costs are better than dangerous waiting lists. Pro also fails to establish any of her claims with sources. A Supreme Court Judge said best with the following quote:"Access to a waiting list is not access to health care..." -Chaoulli v. QuebecEurope has poor access to Healthcare. Often taking entires months to do what the US does in a month or less.Regarding Crimes: Pro's case is entirely Fallacious. Pro states that because the US has more homicides, Europe must have less overall crimes. Or that because no European City is in the top most violent list, that her case wins. Pro did nothing to prove her case. She has no sources or stats on Overall Violent Crime. I did. Not all Violent Crimes are Homicides. There are Robberies, Rapes, Assault, and more. As my R2 sources states, the US has half the number of wiolent crimes in total as Europe (6). If Pro wants to counter this, she must post actual stats for Violent Crimes. Not just the crimes that match her narrative. Regarding Rape. More men getting raped isn't relevant. And is this statistical (1 out of every X) or a whole number (1 total)? To cherry-picked men and not observe the full number is fallacious. More men =/= worse rape. More total = worse rape. In reality, places like the UK, Belgium and Sweden, face far higher rapes per capita than the US (Sweden has literally twice the number of rapes per capita)(7).Rebuttal II: Economics:Pro's case is rather silly... Minimum Wage =/= Higher Wage. Even if so, to many, higher minimum wage is bad. As my stats shown, the actual wages in the US are above that of ALL European Nations. Pro has no case here. Luxembourg, her main case, may have a higher minimum wage, but the US outranks it in both gross and disposable income by over $11,000 a year (8).To continue the Argument... The US has increased it's number of employed so much that it has put more people back to work (using actual increased workforce, not lower unemployement rates) than ALL "Advanced Economies" minis Hong Kong and Taiwan (note: not European.) To add context: The International Monetary Fund classifies 36 countries as advanced economies (9). These include most of Europe. Not only did the US put more people back to work than Germany, France, and the UK... They put more people back to work than each of those put together + 31 other advanced economies combined (10).The US has, since 2009, increased it's workforce by over 4.2%, compared to the 1.9% of all Advanced Economies and the 2.4% of all G7 Countries (consider "Major Advanced Countries")(11).Pro's arguments does not account for my claim about Oil Dependency, prices, Cost of Living, Economic Freedom, GPD, Unemployment and Taxes. Pro has dropped these cases.Rebuttal III: Culture.Pro assumes that because US Movies have some European stars, they are European Movies as well. Pro also ignores that European Movies have American Stars too. Pro dropped Books, TV shows, and the records I posted.Pro is correct that Europe has the most visited nations in the world. However, this is ignorant of the very first paragraph of my R2 rebuttal. It is also ignorant of the fact that, because of open borders (something most Conservatives and even many Europeans oppose), the gap between Unique Visitors and Total Visitors is extremely high (many a high inflation rate in Tourist numbers {meaning high numbers become meaningless}). If one guy goes from the UK to France, then to Belgium, he counts as 2 tourists, but still only counts as one guy, and isn't an impressive display of Culture.Pro is wrong to claim the US has no long-term history. The US has Native American history and culture. Native American history dates back as far as 12,600 years (12). Also, having more history =/= having the best history. Remember (based on my R2 arguments) that over 70 million people are willing to pay $1000+ to visit the US. If the people visiting France had to pay that much, you'd see the number drop drastically. That being said, having more visitors is meanlingless (see prior paragraph) if the price is low enough. If fine diners cost $40 to eat that compared to $10 at McDonald's, does it mean McDonald's has more business because it's product is better?Rebuttal IV: Politics:Pro's case is, again, entirely relative. Every Conservative reading her case would disagree that European Liberal policies make Europe freer or better. Pro hadsn't listed off the application of Liberal Policies in Europe. She has only stated that europe is Liberal, and stated things meant to reinforce that they are Liberal. I have actually stated a controversial policy that is a product of European Liberalism and shown how this policy reduced Freedom of Speech. To restate the argument, a man was arrested for stating (in a private conservation) that the Bible say Homosexuality is wrong. This move was legal, as the gay police officer found it violated Liberally enforced Hate Speech laws. To state Europe is freer is unsupportable, especially when pro's only argument is about how "progressive and liberal" it is.Europe is also plagued by a rise in policy based on the Healthcare myth that Vaccine's lead to Autism.Pro has effectively dropped my entire case, deciding to only repeat her own.Rebuttal V: Education:Pro has largely dropped the case on Education. I wish to reinstate the argument. Pro's main argument steamed from a study that shows that US is at least around 11th place. This is correct from the wrong angle, and incorrect from the right angle.The ranking is based on scores. However, Pro's case lines them up. This style makes massive gaps between countries that aren't reallyfar apart, and doesn't represent the scores properly. And example: Lithuania is 10th place. Germany is 12th places (2 whole places under the prior nation). This makes Lithuania better, right? No. Because Lithuania's actual score is only 5 higher... Out of over 600... They are, in fact, tied. The two nations are seperated by only 00.95% (or 1 out of 1000), but Pro's style makes them appear like the first nation is entires ranks above Germany. Scores are grouped together because of that issue. Since Lithuania's score is 630 and the US's 629, meaning they are tied, they are the same rank. To put them in 10th place and 11th place doesn't correctly represent their scores. Margin of Error means the US could even be higher than Lithuania with how similar their scores are. That being said, the US is in 5th place with Germany (14).Pro is also mistaken in her assessment in that she states the US is only 11th place but doesn't rank the US with only European Nations. In reality, the highest European Nation on the list is Russia, who is only 3% higher than the US in score. By the actual ranking method, the highest European Nation is in 4th place, just 1 above the US. Only 3 European Nations are in that rank. The US outranks most every other European Nation.Conclusion:Pro has not proven that Europe in objectively better than the US. Europe has a worse healthcare, worse crime rate, and a worse economy, while politics and culture are relative matters, and the US and Europe's education system is in close range of each other if you exclude 51 of their 56 countries.Europe might be worse or equal, but they are not better than the US.Sources: http://tny.cz...;