Immigration Should Be Illegal in the United States

==Rebuttal== "Most immigrants work to either buy drugs or help out their family. They can not go to school for that reason. Another possibility is that they drop-out before high-school. " You have made an assertion without proof to back it up. There is no proof given to say all immigrants are drug users, or they don't go to school because they are too concerned with working. " According to that definition, Asia, North America, South America, Australia, Europe, Antarctica, Africa, Western Hemisphere, Canada, Mississippi, Middle East, etc. are all regions. To enter and settle in a country or region can be to move from Japan to Canada, or it can mean to move from California to Arizona. I am only addressing international immigration, not local immigration though. " The resolution states all immigration. You did not define it as international immigration, so all forms of immigration count. My points on local immigration still stand unless my opponent refutes them. He also admits that moving from state to state is a form of immigration, so under his proposal immigration be made illegal, no American would be allowed settle in a new state, but they would be allowed move to a new country. This is surely ludicrous. "Most countries people immigrate from don't look after them! " My point entirely on why immigration should be allowed. "I said countries may be upset with a lower population because, a big population can give a country a sense of domination. China is very dominate. Their population is over one billion. If they had a smaller population they would not have so much power. For instance, Iraq's population is 26,074,906. Is Iraq a powerful country? " Actually, what you have said is completely wrong. China is dominant because it is the 4th largest country is square miles in the world. America is a dominant country because it is the 3rd largest country in the world. Russia is dominant because it is the largest country in the world. Because China has a large size, means it can host a largew population and a large army. Whilst population factors into, size factors into it more so. Nigeria has a population of 127,766,000. Pakistan has a population of 162,420,000. Japan has a population of 127,417. Russia has a population of 143,420,000. It's quite obvious from these figures these countries have roughly the same populations. Only 300,000 people separate Nigeria and Japan's population, yet Nigeria has nowhere near the same population as Japan. Pakistan has more people than Russia by 20 million, yet they have nowhere near the same voice as Russia. Although this isn't related to the main debate resolution, it proves that countries dislike immigration as it makes them feel less dominant, therefore disproving his point. "You know, my opponent agreed with me more than he disagreed with me. " I feel that my argument made it quite clear I disagree with your 'No immigration policy. ==Summary== My opponent has not refuted the majority of my points, so they still stand until he does so. He has only chosen points that he can refute. Once again, my summary: - Outlawing immigration would prevent people moving from state to state. - Immigration's effect on the economy is often good. - Crimes committed by Immigrants are outweighed by those committed by U. S. citizens. - Immigrants have a better chance surviving in America, and deserve the opportunity. As the debate currently stands, I urge a Con vote.