God does not exist

Thanks for the responce! Now i will go over my case of 4 arguments, then preceed to refutation.CASEOntological Argument P1) It is greater for a thing to exist in the mind and in reality than in the mind alone. P2) "God" means "that than which a greater cannot be thought." P3) Suppose that God exists in the mind but not in reality. P4) Then a greater than God could be thought (namely, a being that has all the qualities our thought of God has plus real existence). P5) But this is impossible, for God is "that than which a greater cannot be thought." C1) Therefore God exists in the mind and in reality. Argument from Time and Contingency P1) We notice around us things that come into being and go out of being. A tree, for example, grows from a tiny shoot, flowers brilliantly, then withers and dies. P2) Whatever comes into being or goes out of being does not have to be; nonbeing is a real possibility. P3) Suppose that nothing has to be; that is, that nonbeing is a real possibility for everything. P4) Then right now nothing would exist. For P5) If the universe began to exist, then all being must trace its origin to some past moment before which there existed—literally—nothing at all. But P6) From nothing nothing comes. So P7) The universe could not have begun. P8) But suppose the universe never began. Then, for the infinitely long duration of cosmic history, all being had the built-in possibility not to be. But P9) If in an infinite time that possibility was never realized, then it could not have been a real possibility at all. So P10) There must exist something which has to exist, which cannot not exist. This sort of being is called necessary. P11) Either this necessity belongs to the thing in itself or it is derived from another. If derived from another there must ultimately exist a being whose necessity is not derived, that is, an absolutely necessary being. C1) This absolutely necessary being is God. Cosmological Argument P1) Everything that exists or begins to exist has a cause. P2) The universe exists and began to exist. P3) The universe must have a cause. C1) The cause of the universe is God. P5) An actual infinite cannot exist. P6) A beginningless temporal series of events is an actual infinite. P7) Therefore, a beginningless temporal series of events cannot exist. P8) If something has a finite past, its existence has a cause. P9) The universe has a finite past. P3) Therefore, the universe has a cause of its existence. P4) The cause of the universe is God Argument from Contingency P1) If something exists, there must exist what it takes for that thing to exist. P2) The universe—the collection of beings in space and time—exists. P3) Therefore, there must exist what it takes for the universe to exist. P4) What it takes for the universe to exist cannot exist within the universe or be bounded by space and time. P5) Therefore, what it takes for the universe to exist must transcend both space and time. REFUTATIONARGUMENT 1 : Omniscience and Free Will Argument P1) God is omniscient P2) God has free willA. Before attempting this argument, you must define what “free will” necessarily is.B. The major wrong assumption that you’re making is that God has free will. However, God doesn’t have complete free will either. If ‘free will’ is defined as “being able to choose between good and bad options”, God knows what is bad, so he does not have the ability to choose what is bad because God can only do that which is good. His nature is holy, meaning that he cannot sin. In the case of God, because he is holy and cannot sin, he is only completely free to the extent where he can choose to do only those things which are good because that is what is consistent with his essence.C. Even if we If I accept that God has free will, Neg still has won the debate. If ‘free will’ is defined as “the ability to make choices without being coerced”. Certainly God is not forced to choose something by anything outside of himself when it comes to making decisions. So from this simple definition as God is a perfect being, and is impossible to be coerced, any action or whatever he does itself is free will, meaning that by being all knowing he has free will. Meaning that in the case that God has free will, he still can be omniscient P3) An omniscient being cannot have free will. A. You showed no analysis on why that is the case; It’s still on your burden to prove why an omniscient being cannot have free will; why an all knowing God cannot have free will.B. Also, sure I may be able to accept this fact as in ‘B’ of refuting your P2), I did accept the fact that God doesn’t have free will but that doesn’t prove why God doesn’t exist.C. Some other pieces of analysis you may draw up to the fact that an omniscient being cannot have free will may be somewhere along the lines of: (in bold)., and I will also refute those (not in bold) -Entities with free will have non-determinate futures i. This is an assumption that has not been proven. A person can freely choose to act and have that act be known by God, but God knowing what a person freely chooses to do does not mean the person wasn’t free to choose it. ii. The determination of a future event chosen by a free will restricts the future event to that choice because the person had freely made that choice. The person was free to choose it or something else, and the choice is determined at that time. -If an entity knows the future, the future is not non-determinate. i. Knowing what a person chooses to do does not mean the person has not freely chosen it. Whatever the person freely chooses to do is what is known. If the person would have chosen something different, that is what would have been known. So, the argument is invalid. C1) Therefore god does not existA. It’s still on your burden, as in a similar case with your ‘P3)’ to prove why an omniscient being without free will cannot exist. Just because there is a contrast with God being omniscient and not having free will, doesn’t mean that God doesn’t exist. i. Just because an omniscient being doesn’t have free will doesn’t mean that they don’t exist. ii. You haven’t even been able to prove why an omniscient being who has free will cannot exist.B. God can still exist if he doesn’t have any free will. As I already mentioned previously, “His nature is holy, meaning that he cannot sin. In the case of God, because he is holy and cannot sin, he is only completely free to the extent where he can choose to do only those things which are good because that is what is consistent with his essence.”, meaning that God by being God cannot sin, meaning he doesn’t have free will, but he still is omniscient; that he still exists.Thanks!