Banning the Sale Of Guns From Stores(REUPLDOAD)

Round 3 Args Pro Let's get this show on the road ============ LETS USE SOURCES: http://abcnews.go.com...... You say we should be able to use handguns. But that has to lead to a mass shooting "ROSEBURG, OREGON: OCT. 1, 2015. 10 DEAD Christopher Harper-Mercer and his family members legally purchased the handguns and rifle he used in the Umpqua Community College shooting from a federally licensed gun dealer, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. mass shooting as well. Pistols, pumps, and hand shotguns have all caused mass shooting" He caused so much damage with a handgun! 10 dead is a staggering amount for a handgun, which you said was OK to own. How can we eliminate this problem when there are ways where criminals and lunatics can get their hands on these guns. Their parents got it LEGALLY!! They sell AR-15's in stores as well. In fact, that's how most shooters got their guns. If you agree that's what they shouldn't be owned, then they need to get rid of it from stores completely! What you said here is in agreement with me! WHY IN AGREEMENT: You claim that we need to stop people from having AR-15's. I agree. We can do that by removing them from our stores. This is the only way to solve this and no other way can stop it. Even handguns as I stated, were used in mass shootings. No one is safe, so we need to remove the problem now ================================================================= Increased gun regulations won't help at all This article I found sums it up perfectly https://www.mediamatters.org...... "Despite popular belief, in the last sixteen months since Newtown, the media has incorrectly portrayed the complicated and nuanced activity in fifty different state legislative bodies. The new laws have been tallied, and often, have been inappropriately equalized. Small bills which keep concealed weapons permit holders' information private have been categorized as having equal weight to sweeping new laws that require background checks and ban assault weapons." "This sort of count treats all gun legislation as if it were equally meaningful, creating the false narrative that state gun laws have, on balance, loosened nationwide since Newtown." Here is a list of the states with strict gun laws: https://www.deseretnews.com...... We still see 50% of those states have had more than a dozen killed in mass shootings. They have done nothing to stop the shootings. Even California ranked #1 in strict gun laws, has experienced 2 deadly mass shootings. The best solution is getting rid of guns from our stores. Also, background checks don't do anything at all. Even if they go more in-depth with background checks, we can't control fate from happening. If someone seems clean and innocent, they have a chance of shooting up. The best solution is to remove them from being sold. ================================= It's not fair to use personal examples in this debate. I was a green belt in karate (lol) and I have pretty good self-defence skills. Those defence mechanisms work just as well. Now...let's talk about your black market. Increasing gun laws actually turn your argument here. Increasing laws means people with a clean background are able to buy the guns and sell them on the black market illegally. Take them away, well they can't get their hands on them which means these buyers are unable to get guns from stores. Now you shift your argument about self-defence. There are many wikiHow's and martial arts videos about how to disarm a gun possessing criminal Here is the wikiHow: https://www.wikihow.com...... There are many videos by BLACK BELT SENSAI's about how to disarm. If you know how to do that, then if you grab a knife, they will leave you alone. Holding them down gives enough time to call 911 and get him arrested, simple. However, we don't need to worry about this situation if the black market can't get guns. Your examples are very very bad(I am sorry) There is no chance the U.S would remove the nuclear arsenal without other countries agreeing to. This is a ridiculous argument and therefore the logic is misleading. This alcohol prohibition is a fallacy. Alcohol is easier to get on the black market compared to guns in general. It would be harder to obtain, therefore making it impossible to get. ========================================== The FBI could have prevented it from happening, that means all this would've been stopped, so they technically knew about it. ===========================