Racism is justified.

Note: In this debate, I don't need to justify every type of racism (ex: racism against white people to discriminate), just to say that in principle, it is justified.My case will depend on racism (the notion that one race is inferior to another) against black people compared to white people.C1. IntelligenceIt is well known that black people in the world have a lower intelligence level than that of white people. As the Psychology Department of Western University finds in 2005 [1]: "Currently, the 1.1 standard deviation difference in average IQ between Blacks and Whites in the United States is not in itself a matter of empirical dispute ... Racial-group differences in IQ appear early. For example, the Black and the White 3-year-old children in the standardization sample of the Stanford–Binet IV show a 1 standard deviation mean difference after being matched on gender, birth order, and maternal education (Peoples, Fagan, & Drotar, 1995). Similarly, the 240 RUSHTON AND JENSEN Black and the White 21⁄2- to 6-year-old children in the U.S. standardization sample of the Differential Aptitude Scale have a 1 standard deviation mean difference" What they find in this paper is that there is a 15 point intelligence quotient difference between blacks and whites that were surveyed. Obviously, this means that there is a superior race when it comes to intelligence; and discriminating against black people based on their intelligence levels is a legitimate reason, which is what my burden is to prove.C2. ViolenceAs Time Magazine notes in 2013: "young black men do commit about 50% of the murders in the U.S. ... Young black men murder 14 times more than young white men. " This means that black people are more violent than white people, meaning that they are inferior because they prefer to kill over being peaceful; negatively impacting society because they reduce the population of the superior race. There is a legitimate reason to think that people of a group that have 14 times higher homocide rates should be thought of as inferior, thus I have met my burden even further.Thus, I affirm. Now, I will look at my opponent's case and refute what they have to say."racism is not justified because It hurts one another's feelings" Then neither is the criminal justice system, because it hurts the feelings of criminal wrong-doers. That's not a reason to negate, it's a truism that doesn't matter."We must remain humane."Racism is humane because it looks at the crimes of a race and compares them to the crimes of another; I don't see what you are trying to get across here."Secondly, racism dates very far back, and to be racist would be evoking very old feelings."So do human insticts, such as the instict to breathe. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't have these old feelings."Being racist would mean starting a conflict, and not everyone likes conflict."Actually, it appears that black people are the people starting conflict; putting these people in their places is actually less of a conflict because it is justifiable. You don't have a warrant for this claim either, so we can just disregard it as false."And that, is simply, wrong."Why? You say it is wrong but offer no real reasons why it is. [1]. http://psychology.uwo.ca...[2]. http://ideas.time.com...;