Girls and Boys Should Attend Different Schools

Good afternoon,Ladies and gentlemen,If Con is such a great debater, he/she should be able to win a debate anyhow. Con is welcome to argue on a definition of the topic, but must support reasonable arguments. Suggestions are welcome, but can we please not debate just on the topic itself.I believe single sex schools are not part of NOW because single sex schools are a rarity, I'm not sure if they even exist!Quoting is not a necessity of arguments and I believe Con is mistaken when he/she says that if debaters just paste links of resources at the bottom of the page, it is utterly pointless! But it is obviously not, if people paste resources they are showing where their evidence is from. Voters do not have to inspect a whole website, but merely a portion which obviously heads the topic a debater is referring too.Con stated that he didn't mean every second of school either but I am slightly confused. In future could Con please explain what he/she is rebutting against, at least the point r paragraph number. My best guess is to say that he/she was talking about learning styles! Con continued to baffle on saying that teachers would make them weaker, but Con has provided no proof to this, let alone make any sense at all. Con still continued on a point that they have already made, I have also rebutted this point already saying that students would still learn other styles but try to focus on the style that particularly suits them.Con states I didn't rebut all his/her points but is that seriously important in debating! If you don't rebut every point are you disqualified? Some points are simply not worth rebutting, can't be rebutted, or don't even know what the actual point is. In this case I was confused to the ground when Con stated his argument/s. Have you ever heard of the saying 'Quality is worth more than Quantity.'When I stated that female workers didn't have the chance to learn that extra mathematics Con still did not understand!!!! Con instead rebutted saying that males would not get that either but male students do not need it because they were born better at mathematics than girls, naturally. That extra teaching is just a stepping stone!.Con has actually helped me in his next rebuttal towards me. I stated this can't happen because the other gender is not there to cause distractions. I said the opposite gender won't cause distractions, which is perfectly true because the other gender is not there in a single sex school. When I said this could not happen I was referring to that exact situation!Single sex schools will still socialize with the opposite gender in school. Schools will often do studies with another single sex school , of the opposite gender, in the area. For example, North Sydney Girls High does studies with the closest school, North Sydney Boys High. A school such as Knox Grammar works with Pymble's Ladies College or Abbotsley works with Barker College. Students also are free to go out of school during lunch, so that is a perfect time to socialize, there will be school camps where you socialize.Con please do not state your time issues with voters' or the audience. Your time issues are yours, and are not excuses. Remember 'Quality always wins over Quantity.' For your information, you have not proved any reason yet to why my points are no good, or rubbish. Any debater can state that, but a good debater backs up their evidence with true, clear, actual, reliable proof!Con's next refute was impossible to understand. I am not sure what Con means by his argument of gay marriage. I can only assume he attempts to say being Gay is not comfortable and therefore we are not comfortable in our gender, generally. If this is true, what Con states, Gay marriage is pure love and if someone is gay they should not be worried of other people thinking of them. To be honest, Gay marriage is a totally different subject matter, which in my opinion would require another debate such as 'Is Gay Marriage Pure Love.' If Con believes these people would be judged it's not saying that the opposite gender won't judge them, therefore not making Co -educational schools any better.Con's next rebuttal/argument left me baffled and extremely confused, and in this scenario I don't have the slightest hint what Con intends to prove! Con simply stated these exact words - Second, a study can"t prove that sex doesn't improve education, but that doesn't mean it harms it. Therefore it doesn't matter. - When did 'sex' become a part of any of this? Con if you would care to explain for your own sake in your last round or in the comment section!Single Sex schools still provide happiness, the happiness of comfort, facing only the same gender, the comfort of not being embarrassed by the other gender. Happiness that you get a fair stepping stone to step off in education!Con's third rebuttal/argument ( I can't decide what it is! ) was that boys need to just overcome their fear to mature ( at least I think that is what Con attempt to state ). But since when was maturity all about fear. Maturity is developed though brain cells forming in your brain, it is natural. It can not start through erasing fear! There are plenty of mature adults who have fears of heights, or spiders, tight spaces even paper! This does not mean they are not mature!Next, Con has no right to stop me from writing anything which may help me win this debate, writing you have four minutes left is not helping you win. I was a member of the debating team during primary school and am now, in high school. Those words are called a case line. Ever heard of it, probably not. It sums all your points in a few words. Your paragraphs just expand and explain your points. Take this paragraph as a tip. Con has also repeated many of his points at least the repeating of mine was called a 'big bang' or a summary in a debating structure. Take that as an extra free tip. Do not forget to thank me when you do exactly that and win!And I am not going to bother with Con's last argument. Question for Con though, where are your actual arguments?And now to conclude my case,Girls and boys have different learning styles such as acoustics and group work. Single sex schools can adjust curriculum's to cater for either girls or boys needs. A single sex school has to look at both sides and at both genders so both girls and boys have to use all styles regularly.Girls and boys start into the world naturally better than the opposite gender at something. The stepping stone a boys steps off for mathematics is greater than a girls. This is unfair for girls because their chance of acquiring an accounting job is less. The chance of a boy acquiring a teacher because their English stepping stone is smaller than a girl's.My final point in my educational side of the argument was that girls and boys are a distraction to each other. When students get to high school, they come to that age where trying to impress the other gender kicks in. The distraction of the other gender prevents efficient learning.The first point I made for my physical reasons I stated that girls and boys can be comfortable as who they are. The "Physical and Biological" changes in our bodies are no longer an issue in a single sex school. Because anything that's happening to you is happening to everyone else. Students don't worry about the opposite gender talking about you behind your back because there is no opposite gender to do so.Furthermore, I continued on saying that the age that maturity starts is much earlier than boys and will effect how students think if they are in a co educational classroom. Teachers in a single sex school only have to be able to teach either students who are already matured, girls, or students who are still maturing or have not started maturing, boys. Compare this scenario to a co educational school and you see that teachers must learn to be able to cope with both matured, maturing and not yet matured students. This causes stress on a teacher and again prevents beneficial learning.Lastly, the sporting opportunities in a single sex school are much greater as staff there only have to provide for on genders' sports. A girls school will have more soccer teams because a co educational school has to provide both girls and boys. The same goes for hockey and cricket.Ladies and gentlemen, a co educational school may give you a standard education but a single sex school gives an advanced education. A place free of distractions from the opposite gender. Single sex schools are great for their educational and physical benefits. If you want the best from a student, send them to a single sex school, and we want all our students to thrive so that is why all students should attend a single sex school.Vote for Pro for her rebuttals, points, resources and structure. Don't forget Pro knows what she's saying!This concludes my part of this debate. Vote Pro!Good Luck Con,Happy Debating,Caty44444444