Food is a choice PART 2 Electric Boogaloo

Boy no one is trolling you. I'm as real as real gets. I sent you a rainbow 6 memes video as your source? That's proof again right there that you MUST be trolling me LMAO where in these two debates have I ever sent a meme video? You're the one who just sent a meme video literally which isn't really helping your "point" it's just a funny video. I don't see facts or research. "I think food and drugs are a fair comparison. " Okay your opinion. But like I said before, You don't need drugs to live, You need food to live. Food doesn't prevent people from passing drug tests, Getting jobs, Overdose, Lung disease, Etc. Drugs do that. You also properly never answered my two questions in the beginning of this debate. Which side are you referring to or more so on? 1. Do you mean it's a choice as in you don't have to eat at all and to starve yourself? Meaning you can choose not to eat ever? Like never eat food again in your life? 2. Or do you mean a choice between healthy food and junk food? Or perhaps choose not to eat too much and to eat moderately? Or are you on both sides on those? I need to know so I can properly make an analysis. "But to also transfer energy from the sun into humans. " We already get energy from the sun. If the sun didn't exist, We would all be dead. We need the sun. 1. "If you have too much of any food, The risks are insane. " - I agree with that. Too much of anything is bad for you. 2. Diseases such as cancer and such not only comes from food, It can come from the environment you're in. About the food - like I said for some solutions in my Round 2 in our first debate: grow your own garden with fruits and vegetables and incorporate that into what you eat. I'll also add: Don't eat out a lot. Nowadays more and more people are eating out, Particularly fast food. Make homemade healthy meals, Plus you are making your food so you know what's going in it. "I do believe we should be living with the bad effects of food. " - You sound evil. Why would you say that? Enlighten me. Yes, Using the food to eat it. To live. You keep bringing the drug thing up. Is someone selling drugs the same thing is someone selling food? Answer that question. 4. My 4th point tied in with the last sentence of my 3rd point. "You need a cookie! Oh wait. " If you don't get that, Read it ten times over. I said it as a joke too lighten the mood, Because you seem very upset and heated. You're taking this debate way too serious. 5. Skip 6. Not really. It was very misguided and wasn't worth replying to. Also, You never answered my question about the leprosy thing in last debate (in Round 2) state your source so there can be facts. 7. Yes, We have solar panels and I'm fully aware of that. Hooray. I love solar panels, They are beautiful. . . . . Your point is? 8. "Just because food has that does not mean you need food. " What do you need then, Please tell me. What's wrong with companies selling food? There's thousands of businesses that must thrive, And what makes them thrive are the customers. 9. Your whole point was just way off. "Food is a need, Not a choice. " that's what I've been saying this entire time. And if that's what you say, Why do you agree with food being a choice? You titled this debate "Food is a choice" and you are Pro meaning you are for it so you are saying it's a choice. "Humans could never give up food" Yeah you just contradicted your last point clear as day. The whole time you're the one that's saying food is a choice. Even in your Round 1 in the last debate you said it. That's proof. Nice trolling. Everyone, Please go to the first debate to see how everything started. 10. "I think eating food is the right choice! That is my ENTIRE argument! We should EAT food, NOT GIVE IT UP. " The way you're talking, You make it as it's the wrong choice. Literally your whole argument you go against that. You said "Just because food has that does not mean you need food. " Again, Everyone look at the last debate. 11. You are such a liar dude. You troll pretty well. Stop making up quotes. The first time nuclear war was brought up was in YOUR Round 3 on our first debate. I replied back to you saying "You're probably the very first person who said they hate food and on top of that, Says it caused "nuclear war" what? Explain that. " I'm still waiting for you to explain that. Your opening statement in the beginning of this debate was "I believe food is a choice" and you were listed as Pro on last debate. It should've still been the same thing on this debate, Now you're Con and I'm Pro? What sense does that make? Why did you switch our positions? It should have been the same. Now all you've done was confuse me and the viewers. I'll have you know that I'm still arguing as Con because that's how everything started out as. Either you're a total dumba*ss or you're purposely tricking/trolling me, Because you are very contradictory in your points AND you're saying a bunch of lies. You switched our positions on purpose to confuse me. Lie 1 - "That does NOT mean we should give it up permanently as you said. " Nowhere NEAR in this debate or our first debate did I EVER say that we should give up food. That was YOUR argument and I was going against it, And I still am Lie 2 - Your 11th point. Really? Contradiction 1 - "Just because food has that does not mean you need food. Saying you need food to live is just propaganda" then in your 10th point you say "I think eating food is the right choice! That is my ENTIRE argument! We should EAT food, NOT GIVE IT UP. " Contradiction 2 - Your 9th point is a BIG contradiction. Like I said everyone look at our first debate before this one. Contradiction 3 - "Your proposal that we should give up food entirely has no evidence backing it up. " That's not what I'm doing. I never said we should give up food. That's what you've been doing. Jesus christ. What type of game are you playing? Don't play with me because I'm not the person you want to toy with. About the "both sides" thing this whole debate is about ME being for food and that you must eat food to live CLEARLY. And YOU'RE side this whole time is that you are against the consumption of food, And you listed your reasons on your first debate. What's immature is how you're acting. If you're gonna have a debate keep it cordial and civil and don't get emotional like a little girl. If that's how you're gonna operate then I've lost all my f*cks to give and I'm not even gonna give you anymore energy. Also, When I said "Food is life" you took it too serious. . . I said that because food is awesome and I love food. Take a chill pill.