Let it be resolved that the state is evil

It seems pro chose to fulfil all three flaws stated. This incredulous vessel shall now explain why._____________________________________________"Con can claim that the state is not evil but there is nothing to substantiate this claim." This is merely reflective of the fact that pro had nothing to substantiate their claim.____________________________________________"I have outlined exactly why the state is evil; con has simply asserted this is not so."This is a contradiction. Con used pro's identical system of logic in round two to reach the conclusion that the state is not evil (as pro reached the conclusion that it is evil). Thus, it is either true that pro failed to outline why the state is evil or it is the truth that pro has simply asserted this to be so. It is impossible, since con used identical system of reasoning to pro, that simultaneously pro has outlined exactly why the state is evil yet con failed to do so.____________________________________________"This is because the state uses aggression." There is nothing evil about aggression. This claim is unwarranted, unjustified and false. Merely blind assertion.____________________________________________"The state threatens us with coercion in order to obtain revenue. You cannot assert this is good without also asserting that it is more broadly right in general to use violence to obtain revenue - something which only a criminally insane person might do."If a criminally insane person is the comparatively evil individual then clearly the state (who run the police and hence oppose criminals) are definitely the opposition of evil. Con asserts the goodness of coercion just as much as pro does the evil of it because neither claim has any evidence to back it up thus making both equally reliable.____________________________________________"Your argument is frankly contradictory and lazy."This incredulous vessel is finding amusement in the fact that the self contradictive and lazy nature of its argument was Identical in structure and form to pro's round 2 argument. It is thus the truth that pro has insulted their own argument.____________________________________________"You claim that government is good because it wages war. This is an absurdity. Who can claim that war is good?"This incredulous vessel can as can anyone.____________________________________________"At most you can claim it is a necessary evil. But to claim it is good?"Baseless, unwarranted false assertion followed by a malformed attempt at a question. Bad move pro.____________________________________________"But of course this is what happens when instead of trying to formulate an argument you simply try to change a few words and subvert another's argument."Yes, especially when you mimic the logical structure and form of an ill-formed argument. Get the hint please.____________________________________________"The notion that without a state child pornographers, rapists et. All would run rampant is ridiculous."This incredulous vessel never made such an assumption, it merely asserted that without the state the freedom to produce anything, as pro asserted would occur, would mean these people had the freedom to produce anything they wanted.____________________________________________"At least though you have now taken the trouble of formulating an argument, so you deserve some very partial credit."This incredulous vessel thanks pro.____________________________________________"a stateless society, one which fundamentally outlaws aggression, one which completely criminalizes the initiation of violence, would be far better off when it comes to moral crimes like this."A stateless society cannot outlaw, criminalize nor sustain a morality of any kind whatsoever.____________________________________________"A stateless society would have ways to deal with these people, far more effective means than the present government monopoly on justice."Baseless, false and unwarranted assertion with no justification given.____________________________________________"And how exactly are the insane going to repress anyone? They're insane."Threatening them with a knife to their baby's neck saying that if they do not do exactly as they are told the baby will be first stabbed in the eye, then sliced the tongue off and only after this will they have the mercy to slit the baby's throat.Pro even agrees with me, since pro state the truth that the people would do such an act of insanity for "they're insane."____________________________________________"You have to have significant power to repress someone; such as the power of the state." There is nothing evil about repressing, the proof has not been given and thus it is an irrelevant point that one needs power to repress. After all, insane people have the power of no conscience.____________________________________________"You cannot cure an economic crises by altering taxes - although lowering them would help"Self contradiction. Nothing more needs to be said on this.____________________________________________"not that any government is ever going to start stealing LESS of our money."The government cannot steal, stealing is getting what isn't rightfully yours. The government have the right to all money in their country.____________________________________________"Instead you must allow the market to recover - something which governments seem incapable of doing."Clearly allowing them to recover is allowing them to enter further recession. There is no sense in not speeding up the recovery process.____________________________________________"Instead of curing economic crises they worsen them."This is an unjustified, baseless and false assertion.____________________________________________"The state is evil."False assertion.____________________________________________"It is evil because it uses violence and the threat of violence (coercion) to bend others to its will."No evidence to back up claim. We can render it false. Additionally no correlation drawn between violence and evil and failure to do so leaves this as a baseless and unwarranted assertion.____________________________________________"These are the evil actions of an evil organization."They are actually the good actions of an angelic organization.____________________________________________In conclusion, this incredulous vessel has sailed to its victory with truth as its fuel and logic as its captain.