Theism

IntroductionMy opponent claims that he has not broken any rules. Allow be to debunk that claim immediately. Here was my rule in complete:"In an effort to make this debate more serious, civilized, and correct according to the universal rules of debate, proper spelling and grammar should be utilized at all times."Then, my opponent said this:"Who is my opponent to assert what is accutally possible when there "YOU ARE........" DUH? How did you get here? The Big Bang??????"I do not know exactly how one would classify that sentence, but it does not follow any grammatical rules I am aware of. My opponent has also made many more errors like it, as well as some very unfortunate spelling errors.RebuttalsI will begin by responding to this statement: "I refute my opponent's false lying statement that Darwin's evolutionary THEORY is a proven fact." My opponent wants proof of evolution. I will give him proof.1. The universal genetic code shows great similarities between all species on Earth.2. The fossil record shows similarities between seemingly different species. It also shows the evolutionary jump between species.3. Genetic commonalities show great gene similarities between different species. For example, humans share 96% of their DNA with chimpanzees.4. Common traits in embryos show that all species are almost the same at first.5. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics show that species do indeed evolve.I believe I have sufficiently proven evolution. I will now move on."I claim to be created by God in His image."Evolution proves that wrong, does it not? How could God have created man in His image if we have proved that we evolved?Next, my opponent gave some long quotes from the Bible. Allow me to explain why this is a poor argument."The difference between evolution and Creationism is that evolution is real and Creationism is not real. Creationism is based on the Bible that says that God created the world in 6 days about 10,000 years ago. Clearly the world was not created in 6 days about 10,000 years ago, so therefore the Bible is just [] wrong. If the world were merely 10,000 years old then how do you explain the dinosaurs that are millions of years old? We've discovered life fossils that date back billions of years. Even the skeletons of modern humans date back before the time of Adam and Eve."If we were to believe the Bible, then we would have to believe the Earth was created before the stars, which is the wrong order. If the stars were created 10,000 years ago, we wouldn't be able to see stars that are more than 10,000 light years away. That's because if a star was further away than 10,000 light years, the light from that star wouldn't have got here yet. Our galaxy alone is about 100,000 light years across. If the Bible were true, we wouldn't be able to see but 1/10th the way across our own galaxy. We surely wouldn't be able to see other galaxies or galactic clusters or know that the universe is expanding. "Our modern technology has proved the Bible wrong. That means that if there is a God, he didn't write the Bible and the Bible is not his word. If the Bible were the word of God and the Bible is wrong, then God is wrong. And if God can't be wrong, then the Bible, which is wrong, can't be the word of God."Furthermore, the Bible was written thousands of years ago by men. These men didn't know anything about evolution, gravity, galaxies, or anything regarding science. They were also most likely malnourished.My opponent has offered many poor arguments that rely on faith along, not facts. If my opponent cannot prove God using factual, viable evidence, then he has given no method of convincing. This is because there is no evidence of God. There is no proof, and therefore he he nonexistent. My opponent's arguments about how God is real because people believe in him is irrelevant and poor.ConclusionIn conclusion, I have refuted every one of my opponent's arguments. My opponent has not been able to disprove any of my argument. Therefore, in all fairness, I believe I have won this debate. However, my opponent still has one more argument to make. When he makes it, we shall see what the voters say. I patiently await my opponent's final rebuttals and conclusion to this debate. Thank you for debating this topic with me.MLA Citations"Five Proofs of Evolution." Evolution FAQ. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 June 2014. <http://evolutionfaq.com...;"Church of Reality." Church of Reality. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 June 2014. <http://www.churchofreality.org...;