Sex Education should be taught in public schools.

My opponent did I nice copy and paste job from my previous post then made comments and assertions with no evidence to back it up, given this, I won the previous round almost be default. His three points (if you can call them that) are as follows: 1. ITS NOT CLEAR DENYING ANY INFORMATION IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCE IS UNJUST. ADVOCATING THIS IS RIDICULOUS. 2. Lot of problems but teaching kids will not fix them. 3. Teaching exposes kids to sex which is immidietely bad. To counter: 1. I will not turn this into a debate about how information should be presented. We both need to keep it on target, but I want to briefly say that any "denying of information" is unjust, especially when in schools because they are actually supposed to learn about topics. Sub point 1 – That being said. Abstinence education doesn't teach any facts. It either teach the lies I have pointed out before, or it literally teaches nothing, that's the goal of the class, to leave the students with absolutely no knowledge about the subject. But kids are curious, they learn about sex, they told that they aren't supposed to do it, then they want to do it. It would be better if they at least knew how to do it properly and safely. 2. "Lot of problems but teaching kids will not fix them." First, incase you didn't read my argument very thoroughly, these problems you are referring to are not actual problems they were lies taught if you could call it that, to children from a position of authority and trust in order to scare them away from having sex or even masturbation. Next, will it totally fix the problem, of course it won't but IT WILL reduce it. If you teach kids that condoms can help prevent pregnancy and the spread of STDs then they will use them more often, if you don't teach them about it or teach them that they are ineffective then they will still have sex and it will be without the one thing that could literally save their lives. But some people would rather teach about the Bible and its lessons as an imitation to a real education and these people are killing or at least harming those who they spew this junk to, but they believe its alright because the Bible says so and it fits their morals. Well guess what, its against MY MORALS to not arm our children with every fact we can to protect them, both about sex and every other possible subject. 3. "Teaching exposes kids to sex which is immidietely bad" WARNING – things are about to get a little less civil. Sex is bad? BAD!!!!!!!!! Who says this is bad? You, the church, the Bible. Who has the authority to judge whether something I do that is consensual, pleasurable, natural, healthy, necessary, and perfectly normal as something BAD? No body has that right; no body on the entire planet has the right to tell me what or what not to do if that action doesn't directly harm society. Does consensual sex hurt people, does it deny people property, does it intentionally kill them, is it against the law, the answer to all the above is NO IT DOESN'T. Even if a child doesn't receive and actual education on sex, what do abstinence programs do? Make kids take virginity pledges, lie to them about condoms and STDs, and homosexuality without them ever finding out what sex is, well that would be impressive but it doesn't happen. As I said before, they will be exposed to sex either through TV or finding and older brother's stash of magazines, or in school. Common sense would dictate that the best place for these kids to learn about sex is in the classroom where they could actually learn about sex so when they try it they can do it safely, but as I can see from you arguments, common sense is lacking.