Urinating and defecating in public should be allowed as long as you clean it up

(Introduction) Aha, my favorite part of debating. The rebuttal! Let’s start: (Rebuttals) “Examples of places to poop could be on the sidewalk, in the street, very close to someone, in a bottle you found in the gutter, in the gutter, down someone's chimney, on a parked car hood, a homeless man's face.” “very close to someone”- This makes the chance of someone catching a disease a lot higher. Also, seriously, who wants someone doing their business right beside you? “in the gutter”- You know people have to clean the gutters right? So even if you pick it up, people are still going to touch your urine or feces. If you are infected with ANY diseases we mentioned, you just passed on a disease to another person. “on a parked car hood”- I guess you don’t realize that a car is a private property. So if we went by the resolution, that would not be allowed. A car hood is not public property! “a homeless man’s face”- Again, no person is anyone’s property then themselves’. So again you could not do your business on anyones face because that is not a public area. Also, just ew. What do you have against homeless people? “Home Depot has those toilets on display you know” I presume that you imply going to the washroom in these toilets? Well, good luck bud, there ain’t no plumbing. Also, some of those toilets don’t come with seats. Or maybe it is just a seat. “Not everyone would poop or pee in public, only a handful of people would want to do that anyway.” Okay, I will split this into two parts. a) Still, there would be more people than there are now. especially in first world countries, where almost no one does their business where it is illegal. More people would be doing it if it was legal. b) Why would only a “handful” be doing this? It is too tempting! No need to pay for bathrooms and toilets! But the thing that people don’t know that it is deadly to do this. “Man pees on plant outside in say new york city. He whips his dong out and is fully erect. A family walk by him. In that family there is a mother and a father, and a small 8 year old girl. She sees the man's large penis. The man sees that little girls reaction and turns to gives her a better look, then the father decks him in the face. The mother cries and holds the child. This is why it should be legal.” Wait, you are pro right? You just said that, through this quote, it is too revealing, promotes violence because of this, and is saying it is basically live stripper club. Then you say this is why it should be legal? Pardon me, but holy crap that is a reason against doing your business in public, not for it! “If you step on a spot on a concrete path with a shoe, death is not going to be 90% If you don't have a foot” What? I think I get what you are trying to say, but it makes no sense. “that person might be homeless, they do not give to society and no one will care if they are gone.” How do you know that no one will care that they are gone? Do remember that sometimes entire families may be homeless and if one family member dies then I am sure that his/her family members would care a lot? Or is it that their opinions do not matter because they are homeless? Even so, If I had a family member that was homeless and had just died, I would care a great deal! “If they are not homeless, then there would be a law that says you need to wear shoes around pooping areas.” Really? If public defecating and urinating was allowed would that make you the lawmaker in the country? This point does not help your argument. “Like smoking areas in parks, there can be pooping areas (with little blue baggies). Where shoe in public is a good idea anyway.” If defecating and urinating in public was allowed, then there would be no need for special areas, now would there? Also, some people may not realize that there are special zones for defecating and they may end up walking in a persons fecal matter! Now, a lot of people don’t pick up dog feces, why would that make human feces any different? “Someone could be walking on a gravel road and pick up a worm that digs into their foot. I could source that type of worm that does that but naww” What does that have to do with this debate? The debate is “Urinating and defecating in public should be allowed as long as you clean it up” This part of your argument has nothing to do with the debate “Anything could happen to your feets when you walk barefoot. This Ebola could lower the population significantly. We have been saving the weak and fat from mother nature for years. Letting nature kill us off to control our stupidly overgrown population is not something that we do not allow. We have about 7 billion people on earth as of 2013. We need less humans on this planet.” A) anything happening to your feet just supports our previous argument, even wearing shoes may not be enough to protect your feet. B) EXACTLY! Defecating in public can spread Ebola. C) You want to allow a whole bunch of INNOCENT PEOPLE DIE??? Allowing that is basically genocide! While yes, this planet is getting more and more crowded, I am sure that there are more peaceful ways to control overpopulation. But the fact that you find it okay that innocent people should die, is repulsing! I don’t care if you are trolling or not, but the death of innocent people IS NOT OKAY. “I recommend watching the movie Rampage.” What does that have to do with this debate? You have said so much useless garbage throughout this debate, why is that? “People have always pee-pee'ed outside for generations and it has not affected anything.” Please refer that to my previous argument. https://docs.google.com... “Ok, and when I need to clean up my fathers pile of dead babies, I use a pitchfork. I do not think congress wants to use your work.” How is this related to our topic at all? What the heck? “guess its rebuttal time. I don't know what rebuttals are, but I will still try to make them” I guess it is too late, but rebuttals are what I am doing right now. “It is ok for people to die from diseases caused by the dropping left by people in public. Thin out the herd I say.” Ok, I am going to copy and paste what I said previously: You want to allow a whole bunch of INNOCENT PEOPLE DIE??? Allowing that is basically genocide! While yes, this planet is getting more and more crowded, I am sure that there are more peaceful ways to control overpopulation. But the fact that you find it okay that innocent people should die, is repulsing! I don’t care if you are trolling or not, but the death of innocent people IS NOT OKAY. “The only way to keep out poop out of the environment is to destroy it, bury it, shoot it into space, or tell it to leave.” Again, some random crap (excuse the pun) that makes next-to-no sense in this debate. “For the wildlife that die off, that will not affect us that much. We will have more than enough plants to go around to make soylet.” Are you kidding me! As humans, we eat lot’s and lot’s and lot’s of wildlife. It is what keeps us going. We can’t just start killing them, because we need them as food for our growing population! “The freedom we will get will be worth all of the damage. A lot of jobs could be made for disinfecting areas. Imagine the riots!” Again, that goes against your whole side. You WANT RIOTS?????? Jeez! You cold-blooded troll. (Conclusion) Thank you for this debate, despite how trolling vs serious it was. And VOTE CON! WHY WE HAVE WON! -We had better arguments -We refuted all your points. -You troll while we actually made sufficient and realistic points -We credited in total 14 sources while you credited 2. Those 2 where both trolly-ish things -We had better spelling and grammar. DDD