Believing Evolution theory is to call Christ a liar.

I'm not sure if there's any reasonable way to prove A, although I do think that Christ did not believe in a literal Genesis creation, so I'll stick to B and C.Arguments:Contention One: Genesis does not teach a literal six day creationInterpreting Genesis completely literally is actually a fairly recent innovation. Throughout the years, many great theologians, such as Origen and St. Augustine of Hippo, have deemed Genesis to not be a literal account of events, but rather an allegory. Note the improbability of it being six literal days:'(4) These are the generations of the heaven and the earth, when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the heaven and the earth:(5) And every plant of the field before it spring up in the earth, and every herb of the ground before it grew: for the Lord God had not rained upon the earth; and there was not a man to till the earth.' - Genesis 2:4-5According to this, God made the heaven and the earth and every plant of the field and every herb of the ground on the same day, as it says 'in the day [Singular] that the Lord God made the heaven and the earth: And every plant of the field...' (Emphasis and [] mine).'(1) He that liveth for ever created all things together. God only shall be justified, and he remaineth an invincible king for ever.' - Sirach (Ecclesiasticus) 18:1Speaks for itself. Everything wasn't created together if it was created seperately.St. Thomas Aquinas harmonized these verses as follows: 'On the day on which God created the heaven and the earth, He created also every plant of the field, not, indeed, actually, but "before it sprung up in the earth," that is, potentially' [1] I find this a wonderful way to describe creation. God created everything, but that hardly means that he created it all in six literal days. Additionally, if one merely reads Genesis 1, taking it literally, and then reads Genesis 2, taking it literally as well, the order of everything becomes hopelessly muddled. Observe:'(21) And God created the great whales, and every living and moving creature, which the waters brought forth, according to their kinds, and every winged fowl according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.' - Genesis 1:21'(27) And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them.' - Genesis 1:27'(19) And the Lord God formed out of the ground all the beasts of the earth, and all the fowls of the air, brought them to Adam to see what he would call them: for whatsoever Adam called any living creature the same is its name.' - Genesis 2:19Man first, or animals? This is one of several reasons why an allegorical reading of Genesis is preferable.Contention Two: Mark 10:6 does not mean Christ believed in a literal six day creationMark 10:6 reads:'(6) But from the beginning of creation, God made them male and female.'Especially in context, this hardly reads as a ringing endorsement of creationism. As it stands, from the beginning of creation, God did make them male and female. It's not like humans just popped up and God was like 'Cool! I never saw this coming!'. He knew how He intended his creation to work out from the beginning, male and female.Conclusion:I believe I have shown both that a six day literal creation is improbable and that Mark 10:6 is not an endorsement of a literal six day creation. Thank you.Sources:1. http://www.sacred-texts.com...