This Debate is Entirely Binary.

also for viewers I suggest the use of: . http://nickciske.com... This wil allow your reading to be eased. .. First I feel to need to list the Resolutions of this debate and explain why one of them must be chosen by my opponent: 1) Resolved: This Debate Is Entirely Binary. My opponent selected this as the TOPIC of the debate, as a result the Co has no other obligation than to assume this is the Resolution we will be debating. 2) Resolved: There is only one video game to feature urine in a jar. He listed this as an alternative topic beneath the Binary Jargon he posted. Now the reason these resolution are the options to be debated in the round is because allowing the PRO the leniency to arbitrarily decide different resolutions every round takes the fun from debate because all arguments no matter their skill or cogency can be dismissed by saying "This is not the resolution" so please keep this in mind whilst reading the debate. No to disprove the definition. 1) Resolved: This Debate Is Entirely Binary. Already we can see both my opponent and I have prove this resolution untrue. When we look to the definitions: Entirely: wholly or fully. Binary: Of or relating to a system of numeration having 2 as its base. (. http://dictionary.reference.com...) (. http://dictionary.reference.com...) and the things I have written, In American English, and the things he has poorly written in also American English, we can see how my opponent has failed to prove the resolution true. So we ought to vote CON 2) Resolved: There is only one video game to feature urine in a jar. I offer one definition: Feature: to play a major part, prominent. (. http://dictionary.reference.com...) So in order to uphold the burden, my opponent must prove that the jar of urine plays a major part in the game. But as I am about to prove this is not so. So my contention is: The jar of urine is not a prominent aspect of the game (Team Fortress Two) IGN writes "Team Fortress 2 is finally available, and it's one hell of a game. With its powerful artistic style and blazingly quick, yet accessible gameplay, it's enough to melt the icy cynicism imprisoning the hearts of even the most jaded among us. That being said, it's not the most complex shooter out there, and lacks bot support for now. Still, the game's got enough to it to last for a long while, and there's a statistics system built into Steam to help keep track of everything. Buy it, load it up and let loose. It's near-impossible to be disappointed" (. http://pc.ign.com...) As we can see no where in this or in the total report is the jar of urine brought up, meaning IGN did not feel it was an prominent feature in this game nor reason to give it its high ranking. But if this does not suffice we may look to a report released by Gamespot, and I quote "Valve has done a fantastic job creating and balancing the maps, classes, and other game elements that are within their control. Still, Team Fortress 2 is a purely multiplayer game and, as such, lives and dies by the team. Most of the time you'll find yourself well matched, but the inherent uncertainty of the game can make for some vexing sessions. Your best move is to seek out friends and servers that are least likely to yield such sessions, and then enjoy the fertile battlegrounds that Team Fortress 2 so expertly cultivates. You'd be remiss not to reap this harvest. " (. http://www.gamespot.com...) This further proves that companies do like this game but not for the reason my opponent says. Thank you and I urge a CON vote for the following reasons: CONDUCT: At this point in time neither debater has demonstrated anything less than cordial so no vote. SPELLING AND GRAMMAR: My opponent uses improper American English, both in his Binary and in the "Irrelevant" message. Therefor this vote ought to go to con. ARGUMENTS: The PRO made no cogent arguments merely assertions about a game, he failed to both give and uphold a proper resolution, while CON has provided evidence why the PRO is incorrect. SOURCES: By numbers I provide more, but furthermore the PRO sets up an instance where the CON must do their "homework" and research the PRO's position, without any sources as a start. Thank you and I eagerly await a response.