BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
the death penalty is wrong

There is morally wrong and legally wrong. The death penalty goes against our most basic human right - the right to life Being killed by lethal injection or being electrocuted is not always smooth and painless, sometimes it causes a painful death This violates any American's 8th amendment right. And is just a monstrous thing to do, would you really be prepared to watch another human suffer as you take there life? Just think about it. No-one has ever proved with numbers that killing murderers stops other people committing similar crimes Mistakes are sometimes made in the law - what if someone is killed who is actually innocent? These are all points to consider, why don't we start using the death Penalty? Well the answer is simple, 'An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind'. That quote is so powerful and yet so true, we must think about how what the world would be like if we just when'd around killing anyone who commits a crime.
Who is the Greatest Batman Villian

Since my opponent has seemed to have chosen Catwoman I have decided to go with the master of fear Scarecrow. I will first rebut my opponents points First he stated that she is a great villain because seduced Batman while this is true another villain has done the same thing and her name is Talia Al Ghul. She is also not has great of a villain because in the comics and in Dark Knight Rises she ends up helping or partnering Batman in many cases because of this she is more like a shady sidekick than a villain. The reason I choose Scarecrow was because of one main reason fear. No other villain can actually make the Batman fear. He does this my his drug that causes his victims to have serious thoughts about their deepest fears. This makes Scarecrow unstoppable once the drug goes into the mind it is game over. This makes Batman recant his fear of bats as well as his parents death which no other villain can do. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com...
Who is the Greatest Batman Villian

It's that woman you dream of dominating you... You want her to just tie you up and grotesquely rub your precious organ as she whips you and scratched you and bites you like the dominatrix she is, it is the ninja pu55y, the pornstar ball-buster...the one...the only...villain to ever both seduce batman to protect, give a ride to and show him what it 'feels like' when someone sneaks out of the scene...Dat goddess...OOOH dat queen...She got a pu$$y like no other, she is a pu$$y but not coward it's............NO! NOT YOUR MOTHER!It's Catwoman, the villain who used the hero and still got laid at the end of it RAWRR!http://www.youtube.com...http://www.youtube.com...;
Who is the Greatest Batman Villian

I had no new points to raise and realised it was wrong of me to debate two rounds if first was for acceptance.Catwoman, unlike Talia, is the ONLY VILLAIN to SUCCESSFULLY GENUINELY make batman fall in love with them. She gets him to lick her out, she abuses him and ye the still SAVES HER LIFE many times because she was kind enough to help him when he needed it, as did he to her. She is the single and only villain of the whole series to genuinely have sex (wait for it before you cry TALIA) AND make batman love her forever more after it. Face it, she is just too hot.
Who is the Greatest Batman Villian

My opponent forfeited and left me nothing to rebut. I will finish with these words. Catwoman is much more like a shady sidekick than a villain. No villain can literally put fear in people like Scarecrow. With just a couple breathes of his toxin someone can go from being perfectly normal and healthy to being in the Insane House. The villain that is the master of all fear, Scarecrow. http://www.youtube.com...
Concept of God

Hello. I used to be muslim and I live in Turkey but I believe if you start to think outside of the box, you will realize that Qur'an has LOTS of contradictions in its own. For Example Qur'an mentions about men having a right to have multiple wives. Even though it was for the war time, with all respect, Should have been more informative. - Qur'an made the concept of god seem mysterious, which makes foreign people to believe in 'Allah' unrealistic. Which just goes against with Qur'an itself again. Because Qur'an claims that only muslims can enter heaven. Also, it is totally natural for a human being to not believe in something that he ; has not felt, has not seen, has not heard, is inferior than. So If we think for a minute, Yes. There are things that we should be thankful for, but whom ? Is it Allah ? Or is it someone whom we witnessed their mercy and good will. Again with all due respect, I believe that Qur'an was written wide open for a lot of misunderstandings as it does not involve any specific information. So the thing we must be questioning should not be ' Who is the right god ? ' it should be 'Why god ? ' Thank you.
Cats Are Better Than Dogs

The most of your situations seem to depend on the master rather than the dog itself. I have both a dog and a cat at home and I will talk mostly out of my personal experience, although I can't prove it of course."They will also not have torn your house apart as opposed to when you leave a dog at home."This is rather an example of poor breeding rather than the animal itself. My dog is perfectly capable of leaving the house in once piece when we are gone for a vacation. About the cleaning part I agree."They tend to jump on whomever enters their home."Again this is subjective. Some dogs do that, some don't. It's mostly how they're raised, and the personality of the dog itself. He can be happy to see someone or offensive when he thinks his master is in danger."This causes them to revert to their killer instincts which makes them a more aggressive animal."Firm isn't always equal to agressive. The police force is taught to act firm when needed, but they stay perfectly in control. It doesn't make them agressive people, just effective. Just like with dogs."It's been proven that there are more reports of dogs biting than cats."This is because dog bites are faster lethal than cat bites because dogs have stronger jaws. Also biting is a form of attacking cats usually don't do, they rely on their paws."Dogs are begging animals. Whenever they want something, they will bark and cry until you give them what they want."Again, this is subjective. This is usually when a dog gets spoiled by the master and gets used to getting everything he wants. If a master shows dominance and teaches the dog its place, it will accept it has to wait for his food to come."When you raise a dog for a long amount of time in your household, they aren't as accepting of having other pets in their home."Another subjective statement. Although my dog can be a bit of a wuss, it's perfectly fine with living with another cat. He knows not to bother her but sometimes tries to when the cat slaps him and then it's okay again.But that's just my dog. I know there are lots of dogs who do have this problem. This is because dogs are protective for their master, whenever they feel their master is in danger, they will act defensively. This is certainly not a bad thing.
Cats Are Better Than Dogs

Dogs can be independent. However, cats can be left alone for days at home and take care of themselves if left food and water. You can trust that when you come home after a week's vacation, they will also not have torn your house apart as opposed to when you leave a dog at home. Cats also clean themselves in which dogs do not. Cats clean their entire fur and their paws whereas with a dog, we would have to bathe them, comb their hair, and dry them off. I agree with my opponent that dogs are more sociable then cats are. However, I also know that being very sociable isn't always the best thing. Since dogs are more sociable, they tend to jump on whomever enters their home. Sometimes they knock people over if they are big in stature. Whereas, a cat will come to check out who is in their home and make an appearance. Also, cats are not anti-social. They are just more careful with whom they allow to pet them or play with them. If a cat senses danger on an individual, they will not just jump on or play with anyone. They will stay away. Cats actually can be very lovable animals to those which show them the same affection in return. Also, though dogs are used in the police force to help with sniffing out drugs or identifying criminals, this as my opponent says causes them to revert to their "killer" instincts which makes them a more aggressive animal. It has been proved that there are more reports of dogs biting people rather then cats. Also, dogs are begging animals. Whenever they want something, they will bark, whine and cry for long hours until you give them what you want. If they do not get what they want, being that they are smart animals as my opponent states, they will seek revenge. They will take things from you and chew them up. They will urinate on your floors and even tip over food and water bowls. I have seen these things occur on more then one occasion with my neighbor's dogs, my family's dogs, dogs of my friends and my own dog. Another reason why I feel that cats are better then dogs is because dogs are extremely territorial. When you raise a dog for a long amount of time in your household, they aren't as accepting of having other pets in their homes. They bark and snarl at other dogs, cats, and any other animals. Sometimes they act this way towards other people who come over as well. Therefore, it causes strangers to feel unsafe entering homes of those who have dogs. This is why we commonly hear people ask if their companions have dogs, can they please put them away during their stay? Nobody is willing to take the risk of being attacked by someone's dog because sometimes a very friendly, calm, lovable dog may get out of control and act out of his nature at random.
Cats Are Better Than Dogs

"They are the most independent, smartest domesticated animals we have ever seen. "Cats are certainly independent, but this doesn't mean dogs can't be. Let's turn the argument around and say dogs are more loyal than cats. Dogs are proven to have bigger brains than cats because they're generally more social pets than cats. For the first time scientists have charted the evolutionary history of the brain across different groups of mammals over 60 million years and identified huge variations in how their brains have changed. They found that there was a link between the size of an animal’s brain in relation to the rest of its body and how socially active it was. "Dogs are so dependant upon their masters for everything that it's hard for them to function without them. "Remember that dogs too have a survival instinct. They're predators. Until humans found them, they were ruthless killers who knew how to outsmart their prey. Dogs are nowadays used in the police force to hunt down criminals and search for drugs, something a cat is unable to do.
Cats Are Better Than Dogs

It's okay. I know it is a short time frame and the judges will probably take that into consideration as well. Welcome back. "You were obviously being negative about it since you later state: Some dogs are absolutely too big to be jumping on people in any circumstance because they will take you down with them. I wouldn't take that as a good thing." Actually I wasn't trying to be negative towards dogs. However, most dogs whether they are trained well or not tend to jump on, rub on, or bother people even if they are just trying to say hello. However, my point was just to say that I believe cats are better in general because they don't tend to jump on people at all for any reason. "If you can search long enough you can see even the cutest kittens killing people. Of course you can find this on youtube because if the dog didn't attack them, it wouldn't be worth filming it, would it? My point is you shouldn't apply a mere youtube video on all the police dogs. This is obviously and exception, otherwise it wouldn't be on youtube." Actually, a youtube video is a very reliable source nowadays in society. Many people actually use them as reference in research reports and college papers. This source is just as good as any other because it is a real story. Yes, any incident is worth filming. I'm sure you could've found a video about cats attacking online as well. My point for picking this particular video was just to show how even the most well-trained dogs can do wrong because at the end of the day they result to their animal instincts. Here is also an article about a man in Texas who was bitten by a K-9 dog. http://www.chron.com... "I've found a nice instruction to stop your dog from whining permanently, you might want to read it if you're having problems with yours." I will take a look at it. However, this comment does no really refute anything. I think my opponent shouldn't point out how long or not it took me to do my research or what I should be reading because it can be taken the wrong way if read a certain way. I think those statements are actually highly unnecessary. My opponent should remember that conduct is a portion of the voting process on debates. Thank You. To conclude my debate, I want to point out that my opponent failed to critically refute my arguments and he has no arguments really that uphold. I have made all of my claims clearly and they still stand accordingly. I also would like to thank my opponent for this debate. Cats are absolutely better then dogs.
Cats Are Better Than Dogs

I'm sorry for the forfeit. I was away from the computer for a while and since the responce time is only a day I couldn't make it in time. I will now rebute your arguments."My opponent agrees with me regarding my remarks about a clean up being required after allowing a dog to stay home."Actually I was referring to a cat being able to clean itself and a dog not, not the house itself. Just to clear that up."I did not refer to them jumping on people in either a negative or positive way, but in a neutral way."You were obviously being negative about it since you later state: Some dogs are absolutely too big to be jumping on people in any circumstance because they will take you down with them. I wouldn't take that as a good thing."A video on youtube, shows how well a trained dog can attack someone because how well trained he is."If you can search long enough you can see even the cutest kittens killing people. Of course you can find this on youtube because if the dog didn't attack them, it wouldn't be worth filming it, would it? My point is you shouldn't apply a mere youtube video on all the police dogs. This is obviously and exception, otherwise it wouldn't be on youtube."You can discipline a dog over and over for begging, but they will still do it."I've found a nice instruction to stop your dog from whining permanently, you might want to read it if you're having problems with yourshttp://dog-anxiety.com...
School shootings are a significant social issue

First off doing very little as my opponent has stated does not make the issue a significant one. My opponent agrees with me completly when he says " we will always be stuck in the society" except im going to change the to This. Now it reads out to be "we will always be stuck in this society" which is true. I think we shois shuld do little things as my opponent has stated. But" little things"does not make an issue significant. 1. not really understanding what my opponent means by that argument.. 2. my opponent conceded this part of the argument. 3. training teachers to use a weapon wont make them less likely to shoot a student but make them more skilled at the art of shooting itself. 4. How would it censor a gun? metal detctors? If so then cell phones and other electronic devices used for saftey will be outlawed. It would also be takin out of the schools budget. 5. A video game wont want to make a kid practice use his weapons in real life. 6. Improving mental care is like telling someone then can never be normal and that you will always be kept away from the real world because you are diffrent. That being said... most mental people dont kill because they are mental but because they are treated diffrently and are bullied in every day life. 7. I find that claim irellavant. 8. helping the family does not make the kide more or less likely to kill with the intention. 9. I am not sure what bolsters social skills is... but i am going to take a wild guess, it is where bolster or whatever is the narrator tells you how to be normal or "civilized"? Programs like that ushually make kids feel more diffrent and secluded in the process. It also makes them a bigger target for bullying. 10. My claim is there is only so much you can do, i agree that we should be watching outfore eachother but that does not nessarily make the issue "significant". My opponent has not made the claim that even if these solutions are inafective then school shootings are still signifacant. So i tink the debate has shifted to whether or not doing something about school shooting is affective. But i would like to remind the audience that even if some of these claims are affective that does not make the issue at hand "significant". I pass the debate over to my opponent.
School shootings are a significant social issue

Thank you for debating. And i knw you been busy. I been busy too. 1. I'm not saying we outlaw guns. I'm only saying we strengthen gun laws. The constitution state to have possession of arm to protect yourself from harm but didn't state what weapon. So we can outlaw the one use in military. 2. (skip)-Cnn point it out. I don't know how to explain it further. 3. I'm not just saying we should just put guns in teachers hand. we will train the teacher. but the teacher is to keep it in a special spot. Our schools security guards are our first responders so we must arm them in the case of emergency just as we would with a police in a school. Except we should train them. 4. There are certain stores that when you go to it and steal something and try to run out theres a *beep* or even in a library if you take something and don't check it out. So these doors for act as the *beeper* if it senses a gun it shouldn't open to the intruder. 5. Cutting out voilence would stop someone with of intent to kill someone. Poeple today fall into things other people do. And that is not a lie, as some kids try to fit in in school. So the voilence that person see will they want to practice. 6. Improving mental care does not mean we imprisonment them but help them out. not having to put them in a special place to improve their mental care. 7. Whenever theres a massive shooting the shooters is usually at the center of intention. The news usually focus on him/her when it should really be focusing on the family of the deceased one. 8. Theres alot of things we could do to "focus on parenting." help the family! the child of the parent. but i'm not going to name all of them. 9. bolster kids' social skills we enable them to get along with others. So they won't feel left out. Study shows that kids that lack social skills usually gets bully and the kids try against the bullies. 10. "It has and is already being done." but its not being done enough. we see kids get bully and others see and walk pass. We need kids to look out for one another because those others kids may be going through alot. -There is always a light at the end of the tunnel. Start now could do a little, while it may not be the most, it could be atleast the start on a path for change. School shootings will always running through this nation and until we find the root and look for change we will always be stuck in the soceity in which we live of kids/family living in fear of another school shooting.
School shootings are a significant social issue

School shootings are not significant because there is simply nothing the government can do. First off I would like to claim a few things my opponent has written on this debate false. 1. This will back fire because if we out law guns only outlaws will have guns. 2. Relaxing them will make attaining firearms easier calling for more death. And keeping it the same does not lower crime rate or make school shootings a significant issue. 3. Arming the schools will cause more death because teachers are not trained for that kind of duty and may take there anger out on the kids. 4. By what putting out a metal fence checking back packs? Elaborate on this and I will post my argument about it later. 5. Cutting out violence won't stop someone with mental sickness or an intent to kill someone. 6. Improving mental care will just be more like imprisonment jailing up mental people for life because of there issues does violate freedom. 7. ? ?? Not sure what you mean by that. 8. How do you plan on doing this? Elaborate on it and I will put my argument on it later. 9. That does not limit shootings or humanity but teaches kids useless gimmicks to try and get friends but when your a social outcast that dosent help. 10. Has and is already being done. There will always be sick people and mass shootings but as I said earlier if we change something with our gun laws the cons will out due the pros. Sorry for taking so long and doing so little was a little busy for a while.
School shootings are a significant social issue

MY opponent has the burden of proof.My opponent has the burden of proof because he must explain why gun laws are a significant social issue.IntroductionMy argument is there is nothing that the government can change to reduce crime rate. Because the gains will be outnumberd by the losses of new gun laws. My opponent must first prove why gun laws are significant before i can further continue.so I turn the debate over to my opponent.
School shootings are a significant social issue

My stand: School shootings are a significant social issue.Propose:I challenge my opponent to this debate because of his claim. while looking at a debate he was debating with someone I came across a point he made that "I really don't see the need to be '"significant" because our government can't do any thing affective to change this problem." My opponent has put assertion before reasoning and doubt that no change can be made. School shootings: Have you forgotten those that have die in columbine shooting, sandy hook shooting, Taft Union shooting, movie theater shooting, and you come out to make the assertion that our government can't do anything to affective change this problem. If there's one thing that history has taught us is that change can be made. What about the great depression, what about WW1 and WW2, haven't we as a world have being working together for a better world.Our government can do something to change this problem. As a respect to the second amendment of the constitution I believe we shouldn't abolish the right to have armed as a mean to protect yourself from harm. But what we see today is people picking up guns and shooting people .Those with mental problems, those who have enemies at school, those go through alot of things in life. Though it may not be the quick fix, our government can do universal background. Do not issue guns to those who are under age, failure to do so will result in closure of business and time in prison. Our constitution state to have possession of gun, it didn't mention what gun we have the right to have, so our government can abolish weapons used in wars. Rules: No rules. Play by your own rules.Debate:- Let's debate!Argument format1. Introduction2.Arguments (rebuttal)3.Arguments (rebuttal)4. Arguments (rebuttal)5. Conclusion. (why you should be voted for.) or why you win. summarize your points if you want to.*you do not have to follow by my format.