Men are superior to women, but women are more essential than men.

There is a concrete rule for this debate.If you don't agree with it, don't bother commenting because I will not alter it.The rule is that this debate should be purely based on the premise that the theory of evolution is true, that it requires no further scientific proof and that all we know of men and women is sufficiently derived from theoretical analysis of social structures of both apes and past human civilisations. Do not argue evolution, do not ask me for proof.There is no scientific burden of proof. This is purely theoretical and shall be purely based on logic.There is a less concrete rule but one I hope you abide by.Raising extremes of either gender to counter generalisations should not be your grounds for debate. For example, the theory that men are physically stronger should not be constantly countered for no reason at all.I would like to now propose the outline of my case, round one for con is not just acceptance it is outlining their case.By outlining the case I mean very basic, short and sharp, point-by-point outline. No elaboration of points, NO REBUTTALS OF MY POINTS IN ROUND 1.In my round 2 debate I shall begin to fully explain my ideas.NO REBUTTALS OF MY POINTS IN ROUND 2.In round 3, I want pure rebuttals. No new points.In round 4, I want counter-rebuttals.In round 5, I want a conclusion.The reason I have set such a rigid and strict structure for the debate is that debates on the topic of sexism and racism often end up with a huge vote for con due to the con rebutting any and all points with 'scientific proof' or exceptions to any rule and generalisation. Additionally they do this before the pro can even begin to explain their points and hence the pro is constantly on the defence never getting a fair chance to propose the idea.Any deviation from the rules will result in a 7 point forfeit. The outline of my case is as follows: Men are physically stronger than women and are emotionally less prone to feel empathy towards a suffering victim of their abuse, this has led to men being more capable of harming and oppressing a victim than women. Men are generally more intelligent than women in departments of politics, philosophy, physics, mathematics and overall scientific theory forming whilst women are far superior to men in their ability to both multitask and carry out actual experiments for the men at a superior capacity for neatness and stress-free steadiness than male experimenters. Essentially making men the brains of most intellectual endeavours and women the implementers. Men are less prone to require friends than women, this leads to them managing better alone. Women, on the other hand, are far superior to men in team playing and often use seduction, even in the non-sexual sense of the term, to get what they want while the men in charge of the teams think they are in fact at their mercy. Women are far more essential than men in terms of reproduction and raising of the next generation of human beings due to their ability to give birth to them, produce milk for them, have increased senses to hear baby crying and having a higher capacity for multitasking, and juggling daily life with the baby, than men. Rape, enslavement, war, dominant figures in households, are more likely to be men than women by a large degree, this obviously emerged due to natural evolution. However, when the women is the perpetrator to the man in the acts and statuses I have raised, you will often find that they are such due to them thinking they are doing the right thing, and searching for a feeling of happiness. Thus making men far more capable of mindless power seeking and hence more men than women are born with the insatiable urge to gain power and superiority over others (I don't even think a single woman is like this, they often only want huge amounts of power if abused severely as children) Bullying amongst women and men is equally severe but men bully with more consistent torment of the victim to the point of their utter submission whereas women usually mindlessly bully and torment their victim to the point of suicide. This shows that when granted the position of abusing oppressor, men manage being one far better than women. Single mothers raise children far better than single fathers. However, they react far worse to being one. I would preferably like a feminist to take this debate (whether female or male), as opposed to a chauvinist who has an issue with my second half of the resolution. The reason is, that if you abide by my rule of accepting evolution, you simply cannot deny how essential women are to any species' (especially mammal's) survival in both the reproductive stage and raising of the child itself.