Abortion is wrong and bad

Thank you. I apologize in advance for the bad spacing; my computer wouldn't allow the last paragraphs to be spaced evenly. 1. The memes Honestly I didn't mean to make the memes big, I originally wanted it to be just some links. I put them there because they explain my point. See, what I'm trying to do is get it in Con's head that abortion--and most feminism related to "birth control"--is hypocrisy at best, and it's sugar-coating murder to make it sound like basically "getting rid of" a "thing" (for the benefit of the mother, usually). "No, it's not a human yet, why would it be since we can't see it?!" (Sarcasm there.) I'll explain my "memes" from R4. Terry O'neill is a well-known feminist, attorney, and obviously she supports abortion. Now, either you support abortion or you despise it because you believe it's wrong, so what one pro-abortion person says will most-likely suit your beliefs as a pro-abortion person, too. http://www.huffingtonpost.com... This explains what she said, and now you can't deny that she said it and you must refute. I would like to end with another "meme" which I want a response rather than criticism. The other meme, Con admitted, is true. There were no assumptions made by me since I have already proven that the unborn baby is a human. What, do you truly think that there's the possibility of the fetus being something other than a human? I think we all know that a woman's not going to give birth to a different creature, and specifically we are debating abortion, so my simple main contention is that a fetus/baby in the womb of a woman deserves to be born and live because it is a human. Obviously it is not full grown, but it is still a human. I am not making any claims concerning sperms at the moment, thus, everything my opponent asserted about my supposed statement about sperms is invalid. Yes, I claim that "unborn life should always be protected because they are humans," but this is specifically in terms of abortion and it is irrelevant to bring sperms into topic. How does something non-human come from human parents? A pre-birth fetal and a teenager like myself can sum up the important similarities that make me and the unborn equally human by these four categories: size, level of development, environment, and degree of dependency. Now, do any of these categories disqualify the fetus as a human being? Will I become more human when my brain finally finishes developing? From the way I see it, Con believes a fetus is not human, just something growing inside a woman's body that is trying to be born into "life." You see that none of these categories affect the nature of the fetus; the fetus is fully human from conception. 2. Rebuttals By reminding you of scenes from "The Giver," I am attempting to visualize how unborn and born aren't different. The only difference is being able to see them. We agree that the "unborn" aren't always fetuses, but we are merely arguing abortion terms, correct? So, aborting the unborn is the same as murder just as the unborn have the same contents as the born. The unborn, or more specifically, fetuses, are in the process of growing and maturing, but infants (and us) are, too. "I apologize, I meant the women that die, usually die that way." Actually the leading death in women is heart disease. http://www.cdc.gov...; I hate to say it, but even if what Con said is true, at least they are dying as heroes that served a great benefit and impact to the next generation of humans. The life of an unborn child is just as valuable as anyone, after all, you and I were once one too and I think I've always been human. Not sure, but I think so. Con states that it is a "proven fact by statistics and research" that a child will most likely be a criminal or threat to society. I'd like to see the source for that--in fact, I'd like to see sources for all the claims Con's made--I have no reason to believe him otherwise. "You can’t “let the child decide” if it wants to live or not." (Quoting Con) This is one of the simple reasons why abortion is wrong and bad (and unlawful murder). Abortion does not give the right to life. It takes away a human with potential forcefully, and the decision to it's life is made by someone who's never met the innocent, unable-to-speak-for-himself, human. Abortion is like giving a blind, deaf, and mute (disabled) person--for example, Helen Keller--a pill which destroys her life. It is impossible to ask her, but you can't deny her the right to live! 3. Conclusion I have stated why abortion is wrong and in no way, good. I have refuted Con's arguments, and in doing so I have proven that an unborn baby is still human. Thank you for participating in this debate--I hope you got the vibe that it was done peacefully, Atheism_Debator!