The Big Bang Theory Is Probably True

I accept. I am very knowledgable on this subject, have studied it immensely, and over time, have pointed millions of fallacies in the argument. I am glad to be debating the legendary subutai, and will make it clear to the audience, that votes should not be based on belief or the reputation of the debater. Henceforth, we will begin with some definitions, since my opponent never made them. They can be contested later, pending he can prove his are more valid.DefinitionsExpansion: an expanded, dilated, or enlarged portion or form of at hing:http://dictionary.reference.com...Matter: the substance or substances of which any physical object consists or is composed:the matter of which the earth is made.http://dictionary.reference.com...Incorporeal:Lacking material form or substancehttp://www.thefreedictionary.com...General Relativity:A theory, formulated by Albert Einstein, that all motion must be defined relative to a frame of reference and that all space and time are relative, rather than absolute concepts.http://dictionary.reference.com...Space: the unlimited or incalculably great three dimensional realm or expanse in which all material objects arelocated and all events occur.http://dictionary.reference.com...The Universe: all of space and everything in it including stars, planets, galaxies, etc.http://www.merriam-webster.com...Observational Evidence ClarificationDo to the nature of the debate, observational evidence should have a signifigantly low impact on this debate, as Pro would be violating "correlation without causation". Hence, only evidence that can be directly connected to subutais reasolution that "matter contained in space led to the eventual creation and expansion of the universe". We are debating that resolution. Not that evidence supports his resolution.Think of it as the equivalent of a creationist saying "Gods real because because mircacle X happened to christian Y". Arguments like these will be seen as a fallacy for the duration of the debate, and if they are made, they should be immediately ignored and unrefuted. Arguments that typically are disputed as "correlation without causation" include...1. Comsic Microwave observations2. Near-Far Hubble Telescope projections (V=HoD,)3. Formation of spacial resources in the universe4. Radiometric DataIf you're wondering why these arguments can't be used, it's because all of these have been connected to a 100 other theories on the existence of the universe. If the opposition wishes to correlate two of these things, he has the full responcibility of proving that they connect to the base BBT theory. If his data connects with even one more known theory, the argument should be stricken from the debate and negated.Base Requirements for all debates- Pro will be held to the BOP (burden of proof). It is not flexible, therefore, is 100% his responcibility.- Any argument made will be affirmed until countered. - Sources are meant to support your claims and inform readers. They are not an argument by themselves.- Pro will be required to prove that "matter (universal substance) is expanded within a space container" is probably true. - The word "probably" has not been completely defined. A typical stance is that there is over a 80% chance that something is true, although propabillity is variable. You can use my standard or create your own.Voting Expectations - Long, tedious votes will be encouraged for this debate.- Voting should not be based on semantics or religious beliefs.- Voters who take a vocal stance in the comments should not vote unless they're certain their stance is non partisian.Final Clarification This debate has nothing to do with religion, philosophy, ect. My stance will not be based around creationism or any other variation of the thing. I intend to solely debate that the institution of a BBT theory as a truth is scientifically unfeasible. Naturally, the voters should be inclined to vote for me until my opponent can prove the BBT theory to be 100% "probably true". I hope the opposition doesn't mind me clarifying a few things. None of this stuff was debate specific, and account for all debates.