Border fence

My opp. failed to understand the duty of rebuttals the duty of the rebuttals is to refute and restate. The problem is is that my opp. decided to bring up new evidence. Therefore all the new extensions to my opp. case should be considered invalid. So if I am correct we are in rebuttal I will layout a road map. First I will refute my opp's. case then I will present my affirmative case again. First my opp. 1C: He alone states that (I don't see much of a need to care about this) so therefore if my opp. can not even believe in his contention then who is to say that he believes in his negative case. Swiftly I can prove to you that my opp. can really care less about the environment. So again my opp. 1C is invalid due to the unbelief in my opponent's words. The negatives 2C basically says that the border fences are too expensive and ineffective. Again I will prove my opp. contention wrong. It is simple you can't put a price on security and from that you cannot put a price on life. My opp. tries to prove that life is important. My opp. rebuttal he leaves us with the quote... ("The security fence is reversible. Human lives are irreversible."-Silvon Shalom) So basically my opp. contradicts himself with Shalom's quote. You can't put a price on security and again on life. So therefore my opp. contradicts his 2 and 3 contention. Ok know to my opp's final contention which is that it hurts people. I won't include his 5C because apparently 'might make the Mexican mad' is a USELESS contention. Ok to the 4C he states that it would hurt people. No it won't, again the illegal people hurt themselves by getting into that predicament. Then my opp. said illegal get shot the reason they get shot is because the neg stated it himself. They are illegal. Then my opp. provides an example of a male who was throwing rocks at agents and got shot. My opponent provide a defense to the male who got shot. The last time I remembered the stoning of rocks kills people therefore the agents did act in self defense. This leads me to refuting all of my opponent's contentions. They are and should be invalid due to the argument stated. Now I will provide my contentions again because my case should be put higher then my opp. He clearly contradicted himself and doesn't believe in his case. Again I will present the Pro case. Vote again for the Pro to win this debate. 1C: Border Fences provide security The reason why the United States provides Border Fences is not to segregate the civilians. The reason being is because segregate is defined by Merriam Webster as (to cause or force the separation of from the rest of society) Again border fences provide a sense of security to the society of the United States and the other countries that have border fences. The America people don't put border fences to Hurt People or to even "might make the Mexicans mad". The reason why the government provides border fences is because they know that borders fences are effective. They don't put them up to spend the "governments money" again they put them up to provide security to the countries society. Which leads me to my next contention. 2C:Keeps illegal people out It is really simple people come and go but the reason border fences are provided is to keep the illegal people out. The people that are surrounded by the border are the ones that we try to keep from coming to the Americas. The reason we don't allow them to come is because they cause the problems, and the truth is we always have to be the situation. Also the government doesn't hurt the people the people hurt them self. They know the laws of the border fences and still people try to cross the border. Again it is simple we have to keep illegal immigrants out. The way we do this is by border fences. This leads me to my final contention. 3C: Also keeps the illegal drugs out If we keep the illegal people out then we can also keep the drug wars/drug lords out. just like 9/11 people can just come in an make a big mess. See if we restrict the drugs and the people from coming in it lowers the catastrophe from the income. Without the border fences drug dealers can come and go. This is the last thing we have on our laundry list, is for the people from other countries ruining the America civilization. So basically the one thing we want for the America's people is safety. We most certainly can not achieved that without out border fences. So in conclusion, vote in Affirmation of this topic... Border Fences do good rather then harm. Again they allow the sense of security,while keeping illegal people out, and keeping the drugs out from the Nation Which We Stand United.