Groups that supports neo nazism should be forbidden

Of course my opponent comes charging in without sources again, but anyway... DEFEND; Points finger* Theres a reason for everything and what happened to KKK was freedom of speech at fault. Think its fallacious? Prove it and this time, i want it backed up with sources. Also, free speech isn't evolved into the fall of KKK, its felony. (murder) Also, what do you think is more credible? A quote from a person that people may not even know or the Amendment itself with the lawbook added whereupon it explains everything? Anyway.... "Pro or anyone else wanting to determine what can and can't be said, they are just not taking away the right of the person to say it, but your and my right to hear it. Consider once again Christopher Hitches referring to other people who have defended free speech." We are now straying off the debate subject, the point is that neo nazism is bad and must considered as hate speech. Do you even think that Christopher will support neo nazism? If you were a jew for example and they declare an all out manhunt for jews, do you still think that you will be happily sitting on the chair of yours and fight about freedom of speech? FYI, im asian :P There is a difference between whats hate and what has freedom of speech protection. Example of neo nazism is most obviously the elimination of all Untermenschen. You protect them? Be my guess, but expect to be hated by 90% of the worlds population. "What they say is it's not just the right of the person who speaks to be heard, it is the right of everyone in the audience to listen, and to hear. And every time you silence someone you make yourself a prisoner of your own action because you deny yourself the right to hear something. Yes I understand Pro has good motives for wanting too censor some type of speech, buts that's the thing with all who advocate censorship, they all have good motives, but so what ? The way to hell is paved with good intentions." So, if its the neo nazis turn to make their speech, you will happily listen to them and obey what they said? Yeah, yeah, dream on neo nazi. Its either let them spread hatred towards individuals or silence them. Your choice on which side you're on. Pro says "Or they could be planning to revert the country to totalitarianism where we citizens have no freedom. Spreading such idea is hate speech and should be forbidden The one who seeks to justify censoring free speech in the name of fighting totalitarianism............oh the irony." Its no hate speech, its just a fear of what neo nazis are capable of doing. I assure you, NO ONE and i mean NO ONE likes to live in a totalitarianistic state. And no, what im doing is not totalitarianism, its pointing out the truth. MASS ATTACK; Slams desk* Of course Con can't see a difference between the hate and freedom of speech. You know racism and discrimination is outside the law. Why protect them if the neo nazis are clearly attacking other through racism and discrimination? Why o Why??....unless you're a racist yourself. I've got nothing to add. SUMMARY: Spreading hatred towards individuals = hate speech. But Con refuses to accept that, so idk anymore. Anyway vote Pro. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org...