Resolved: On balance, the United States federal govenment is justified in intervening in the intern

Contention 1: Contention of isMy oppoenent has dropped this contention. Remember now that my opponent has dropped this contention all I have to do is prove 1 incident were the US was not justified which would disprove the resolution. The Resolution is that the US is justified not was. Is means something is current and completely true to this day. Was means it happend in the past and in this case has been disprooven. Contention 2: US failed in many involvmentsChileMy opponent does not call this an involvement, but let me give you an unclassified CIA document to pounder this thought with. President Nixon ordered the CIA to, "Make the Chilean economy scream and to promote a coup to block President Allende's ascention into power." They did not offer $35,000 they offered $10 million and even more. President Nixon acknowledged that he had a 1 in 10 chance of saving Chile, but took it any ways. (http://www2.gwu.edu...) <--Doc, what the doc says, second to the bottom.--->(http://www2.gwu.edu...) President Allendes was elected peacefully, but since he was a Marxist the US wanted him gone.KyrgyzstanI'm sorry I gave you the wrong link. I was refurring to the Tulip Revolt of 2005. The Revolt saw a lot of US involvement and increased pressence in that nation. (http://en.wikipedia.org...) The link from last round is showing you that the US is attempting to back off of the 2010 Revolt in the country, because they didn't see it in their nation's best interest's. Heck even Moscow turned them down.Middle EastAccording to the Book, America's 'War on Terrorism', by Michel Chossudovsky, upon invasion upon Afghanistan we have found that they countrol over $1 trillion worth of REMs, 90% of the world's Opium, and grade 4 Heroin. "War on terrorism [will be transformed] into a colonial policy of influencing a fabulously wealthy country." They have found that the War on Terror will be funded from the resources coming from Afghanistan. NATO has even set that policy. (http://www.globalresearch.ca...) My opponent has also said that we fixed Iraq, but with the ISIS there can we really believe that we left Iraq better off than we found it?Contention 3: United NationsThe UN is involved in the Syria conflict, but they really haven't been able to do anything due to Russia and China preventing any kind of intervention. (http://www.foreignpolicy.com...) Though the US is involved in the UN. The Resolution is the United States federal government is justified, not the United Nations is justified. This is a violation of the Resolution and is an invalid point brought up by Pro. Do not let it pass through.Contention 4: SovergntyThe ideals behind a nation's soverngty is that they are suppose to prosper and figure life out on their own. A nation's progress is suppose to come from it's expierences. Have you ever done so stupid like stick your hand of the stove while it was on? How are you suppose to know the oven won't burn you if you've never been burned. That is what these nations must figure out on their own. Contention 5: Civil War Means ProgressLet me remind you of Benghazi. The United States Embassy was attacked and several Americans were killed in Benghazi. ( http://en.wikipedia.org...) Libya is still in peril as it is now corrupt as politicans are being killed and go missing. (http://www.reuters.com...) Crime rate in Libya is up 500% in the past two years after the Civil War had ended. (http://www.libyaherald.com...)