Lying is always Immoral

Thanks to my opponent for his argument.... kind of...Actually screw it, I refuse to thank him for getting me into this bore of a troll debate.Go away, Pro -.-My rebuttals function independently of each other to negate the resolution; this means that objecting to contradictions between rebuttals does not work as a valid counter-rebuttal, since they are meant to be independent of each other. .R1) Lying in NatureAll of my opponent's claims relating to this argument can be refuted by proving that that death is moral. I will use a simple syllogism to prove this.P1: It is moral to try helping in improving the world.P2: Dying helps in improving the worldC1: Dying is customary/moralDefense of Premise 1Duh.Defense of Premise 2Dying helps improve the world in many ways1. it helps solve overpopulation2. it allows more food to go to the poor, thus contributing to the elimination of world hunger3. it causes a slight reduction in carbon dioxide emissions (by stopping you from breathing)4. if you are a kid, your parents won't have to spend anymore money on you5. most people are jerks, so them dying automatically makes the world a better placeThus, the conclusion is validated. Death is moral.Since the assumption of death's immorality is a central component to Pro's argument, his entire argument falls apart. By showing that lying in nature is not immoral, the resolution is negated.In rebuttal to Pro's argument that since we always seek to avoid death, it is uncustomary/immoral, I would just like to say that he is blatantly disrespecting all the depressed and suicidal people out there with that comment; he probably just hurt their feelings even more by not acknowledging their existence, boldly proclaiming that "EVERYONE seeks to avoid death". That alone is grounds for making him lose the debate.R2) Lying in BedHere, Pro simply repeats himself, re-asserting that the lack of productivity associated with lying down makes it immoral. Again, I must point out that being unproductive is perfectly customary/moral. I can prove this using empirical evidence:Dilbert comics- they show that humans are innately unproductive creatures, and that any acts of productivity are generally accidents. If non-productivity is the norm, then it is moralAlso, Pro refutes his own arguments by showing that it is much more comfortable and healthy to be lying down than doing work. The whole point of being doing work is to earn enough money to live a comfortable and healthy life; why bother doing all the extra work when you can just lie down and achieve comfort and good health instantly? Doing extra work is uncustomary, and thus immoral. Pro has negated the resolution for me.R3) Online Lying...Pro, just because you're typing about lying down doesn't mean there is a virtual 9spaceking lying down in cyberspace....CONCLUSIONAll of Pro's arguments have been refuted. I hand the debate back to him for his final chance to try salvaging them (he can't post anything relevant to the debate in Round 4)Please remember, that if I am able to point out even ONE instance in which lying down is morally desirable or morally neutral, then I win. I have done so in every single point I have made thus far.