quran is from God

http://www.youtube.com...Rebuttal:1) "iron came from stars"Pro seems to think that this is stated in the Koran.This is what the Koran says:"We have already sent Our messengers ... And We sent down iron, wherein is great military might and benefits for the people"How does that = iron came from stars?the messenger sent was Allah, in the 7th century. & the iron is a metaphor for weapons which Mohamed used to kill & conquer.-------2) "Koran said that montains move .when this discovred?"The koran say:"And you see the mountains, thinking them rigid, while they will pass as the passing of clouds."a) Mountains don't exactly move, & they certainly don't "pass as the passing of clouds". They get taller due to tectonic plates pushing toward one another, which causes it to get taller at an extremely slow & unperseptable rate.Mount Everest "grows" at a rate of .25 feet per year, that clearly not what the Koran is talking about.b) if you look at the context, & even the grammatical format of this very verse, you will see that it is not intended as scientific facts, but rather predictions/prophesies, of some future event. The verse says "they will pass". & all the verses in that passage are in the future tense. So the verses are predictions of some future event, not scientific facts.--------------------3) "bible found in turkey and video"a) There is no independent evidence, that this book is really that old. "some believe it is a fake and only dates back to the 16th century. The oldest copies of the book date back to that time, and are written in Spanish and Italian. Protestant pastor İhsan Özbek said it was unlikely to be authentic. This is because St Barnabas lived in the first century and was one of the Apostles of Jesus, in contrast to this version which is said to come from the fifth or sixth century. He told the Today Zaman newspaper: 'The copy in Ankara might have been written by one of the followers of St Barnabas. 'Since there is around 500 years in between St Barnabas and the writing of the Bible copy, Muslims may be disappointed to see that this copy does not include things they would like to see. 'It might have no relation with the content of the Gospel of Barnabas.' Theology professor Ömer Faruk Harman said a scientific scan of the bible may be the only way to reveal how old it really is."(1) b) Even if the book is that old, what evidence is there that it actually says what they claim it says. The Vatican asked to see it, but they haven't yet. No one has seen it except some unknown Muslims, so how do we know what it really says. c) Even if this whole thing is legit, it proves nothing because Mohamed could have changed his name latter in life, (i.e. when he decided that he was a prophet), to fit this story/prophesy. -----------------------------------------4) "Koran wasn't written on paper,it was memorized"a) & therefore???b) says who?-----------------------------------5) "The lowest point on dry land on earth"LOL.If you look at the translation provided by pro in his link, it doesn't even say anything about "lowest point". "In the nearest land. But they, after their defeat, will overcome." http://quran.com...So basically pro just lied about what the "holy" Koran says.http://www.freerepublic.com...http://www.stratfor.com... --------------------------------------------"they will win": it is prediction"a) The Koran wasn't even written until after 640, which is after all these "predictions" took place.b) It's not from the Koran, it's from hadith, which is the oral tradition and developed much latter.c) From the very wikipedia article that pro sourced:"Present Scholar Karl Gottlieb Pfander writes: "But Al-Baizawi shatters the whole argument of the Muslims by informing us of certain varied readings in these verses of Suratu'r Rum. He tells us that some read (Arabic text appears here) instead of the usual (Arabic text appears here) and (Arabic text appears here) instead of (Arabic text appears here). The rendering will then be: 'The Byzantines have conquered in the nearest part of the land, and they shall be defeated in a small number of years'. If this be the correct reading, the whole story about Abu Bakr's bet with Ubai must be a fable, since Ubai was dead long before the Muslims began to defeat the Byzantines '[but the hadith talks about byzantines and persians confilict, and the counters between Muslims and Byzantin Empire did not took place yet, so this could be biased quote, also note that the nearest meaning of word -al adna (arabic)is- the lowest as discussed above]' , and even long before the victories which Heraclius won over the Persians. This shows how unreliable such Traditions are. The explanation which Al Baizawi gives is, that the Byzantines became conquerors of 'the well-watered land of Syria' (Arabic text appears here) and that the passage predicted that the Muslims would soon overcome them. If this is the meaning, the Tradition which records the 'descent' of the verses about six years before the Hijrah must be wrong, and the passage must belong to A.H. 6 at earliest. It is clear that, as the vowel points were not used when the Qur-an was first written down in Cufic letters, no one can be certain which of the two readings is right. We have seen that there is so much uncertainty about (1) the date at which the verses were 'sent down', (2) the correct reading [Note: it was actually the recitation that was preserved and not the text, so really this argument is applying criticism to the wrong thing and then ignoring the right thing, the recitation of the Quran, not the written record], and (3) the meaning, that it is quite impossible to show that the passage contains a prophecy which was fulfilled. Hence, it cannot be considered to be a proof of Muhammad's prophetic office."" -----------------------------------------6) "Does man think that We will not assemble his bones?Yes. [We are] Able [even] to proportion his fingertips."Pro quotes a verse from the koran, but doesn't explain what it proves.--------------------------------------------------------------------7) "miracle with russian muslim kid hidden by our media:" It wasn't hidden by the media, it was ignored because it's stupid hoax. Some guy decided to write verses of the koran on his kid.What evidence is there, that this wasn't just written by the parents.----------------------------------8) "frensh searcher become muslim after his descover.quran said smthg that bible didn't said:"a) & that is???b) So what?c) Why only 1 "searcher"? ------------------------------------9) "quran gave secret of 2 seas not mixed . Koran is from 1400 years ago"a) Ships have been around for 1000's of years, http://en.wikipedia.org...b) there isn't any barrier as the Koran says. http://www.hoaxorfact.com... ---------------------------------------------10) "other miracles"Not one verse was quoted that is supported by the Koran--------------------------------------------11) "facebook"Forelock is hair, not brain.----------------12)"Allah talk about some people that he made them sleeping many years then he wake them up."The only source for that story is the Koran.How do we know that the Koran is true? --------13) "Koran knew smthg that it is impossible to know it at year 600"Why is it impossible?-------------------14) "I made challenge that no one won . are able to find photo of any human that have smile after death?" a)It's easy to make it look like he's smiling after he dies.b) http://answers.yahoo.com...c) prove that those people are dead, some seem to be alive.d) I "win" your challenge :http://1.bp.blogspot.com...(1)http://www.dailymail.co.uk...-