Global Warming is a hoax

It [Global Warming] is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist -Harold Lewis Billions of dollars are spent every year in Global Warming research, another typical money waste if you ask me. I do not believe the people behind it actuallyve in this pseudo-science, they are fabricating it, and fabrication this big is not just a "scam", a fabrication this big wants to bring change. That change can range from a few political seats to some evo-fascism, something like what the UN's Agenda 21 would want. Before I begin, ask yourself this question: What did the green movement accomplish? Collecting money? What is their biggest achievement? Does it involve getting mega-bucks? Why do 1-percenter green movement powerhouses own oil companies? Why is Al-Gore's carbon foot print sky high? I do find global warming quite silly. It predicts that heat will flow from the atmosphere to the warmer ground. And this violates the second law of thermodynamics. 1-Statistics: Believe it or not, but statistics aren't on the Global Warming's side. The IPCC have been quite creative, but that ain't enough. I will get to it later. #1 . http://www.geocraft.com... Sure, there aren't many statistics comparing human and natural sources for the GHGs, but which side he billions of dollars invested in order to prove something exists? It is no secret that nature's GHGs dwarfs man-made GHGs. The chart is accurate enough: . http://www.thinkglobalgreen.org... Currently general agreement is that 95% of GHG (Greenhouse Gases) are caused by water vapor, and 99.999% of that is of natural origin. We can do little about it. The claim is: We are disturbing natural balance of the 4.5 billion years old planet and it won't be able to take it due to it's pathetically fragile system. A large portation of this claim may only need a ninth grader to debunk it. Water Vapour: How big a facor is water? I mean the percentage of water in the atmosphere gets change constantly but we don't witness change in the temperature. There is a reason it is added list of GHGs. Water is really good at reflecting and absorbing light & radiations. In fact, it blows CO2 out of the water (no pun intended). Collection of quotes admitting it: . http://scienceofdoom.com... #2 Bring me a source that claims CO2 have a better absorption ability than H2O. They imply that water have some kind of a cycle that makes CO2's effect bigger. Guess what? Water absorbs gasses, adding water to CO2 will create a vacuum. How do you think acid rains are created? How do you think sea creatures create shells? The effect is called "Carbon Sink". Read something about it. . http://jennifermarohasy.com... Simple experiment above. Acid rains take between hours to days to form. Not HUNDREDS of years for the GHGs to FINALLY react to water. It is all simple science. Try standing on a scale with an ant. Thats H2O against CO2. How does Global Warming pseudo-science explain that? I have no clue. .. CO2:First thing you need to know is that carbon is at a State of Equilibrium. That is the point of natural cycles That is the basis of Carbon-14 dating method. If it increases in the atmosphere, there is acid rain. If it increases in oceans, there is sedimentation. And eventually, volcanoes will release the carbonate as CO2. #3 . http://noconsensus.wordpress.com... Soil CO2: . http://www.independent.co.uk... It may even cause plants to reach their potential: . http://articles.baltimoresun.com... Second of all, it is heavy: CO2 Mol mass: 44.01 g per Mol CO2 Density: 1.96 KG/m3 Gravity: 1.5189 Air = 28 g per Mol Air Density : 1.2 KG/m3 Gravity: 1 H2O = 18 g per Mol H2O Density : 0.75 kg-m3 Gravity: 0.62 There is a reason there are no plants before there is no oxygen while climbing mountains. That is most of the CO2 is in oceans. Just look at the properties, it is a mess. I need an explanation of how CO2 can get from down here all the way up. . http://news.nationalgeographic.com... . http://www.theregister.co.uk... . http://www.theregister.co.uk... Where is the warming? There is no scientific proof that man-made CO2 causes global warming. Did the surface temperature warm yet? Oh! It didn’t. The Venus argument: Might aswell mention it here. Other than being a logical fallacy with funny counter-examples. It is completely incorrect and based on false assumptions. If we use the IPCC’s (false) formula, CO2 may only heat it up by 38C, so how come it is hotter than Mercury and have a degree 482C? Because it is a different planet. Infact, CO2 may even cool the planet since Venus have 30-40Km thick clouds that blocks most of the sun’s radiation. That’s why there is little difference in heat between day and night in Venus. Venus have a very weak magnetic field, it takes the planet 246 days to rotate on it’s axis, so all the molten magma is not suppressed and the thousands of volcanoes goes ahoy. 2-What does What again? Global warming does whatever it feels likes. And I am not talking about the “scary” failed apocalypse prophecies. Global warming does everything! It makes ice melt, it makes ice thicken. Decide on something already! . http://www.theregister.co.uk... . http://www.realclimate.org... . http://www.usatoday.com... I might as well start a theory about “Global Cooling”… Ops… It was invented in the 70s… Lets cut the hypocrisy already… Cow Fart-Gas > Human transportation GHG . http://science.howstuffworks.com... . http://timeforchange.org... So we should eat less meat! . http://www.guardian.co.uk... Heck, we should be like this woman: . http://www.dailymail.co.uk... We exhale CO2 (Shocker. .. ) 3-The missing link: Contrary to the popular belief, evolution isn’t the only one in the manhunt. According to geological ice sample study, the earth is in a period of cooling and warming. #4 I am not a climate change denier (Ironic right? ). There is nothing we can do against nature. The recent history’s hottest period is 2000 years ago, which is before cigarettes were invented (So you may scratch that out as a cause). . http://www.dailymail.co.uk... Whats that? I’d almost say humans have nothing to do with it. The world was NOT flooded back then, and it won’t start flooding now. 4-The trustworthy IPCC: Calling the IPCC trustworthy is a relative statement. But according to an average hillie billie’s standards, the IPCC is the furthest from “Trustworthy”. The IPCC does not even do research, the fact they have been caught faking so many times is enough. . http://wattsupwiththat.com... . http://tucsoncitizen.com... #5 . http://www.dailymail.co.uk... No comment needed…