Are communist governments better than other forms of government

Let's go over the analysis for the round before we begin. I'd like to draw the reader's attention to the 6th point. 6) Extentions are concessions, and can be viewed as automatic Voters. My opponent fails to create direct clash. Voting off of anything he said and then cross applying it to my case is detrimental to debate, as he simply undermines everything I've written. FIRST- Extensions/Voters off of the Pro CaseEXTEND ENTIRE PRO CASEPremise 1Impact- Equal Societies are better than societies with a class based structure. Communism solves. Premise 2Impact- Market Socialism is clearly an efficient and stable foundation for an economy. Communist Gov solves. Premise 3Impact- Capitalism breeds war. Upholding Capitalism upholds killing millions of innocent people. Communist Gov solves, no social structure or economic downturn that leads to nuclear proliferation. Premise 4Impact- Capitalism breeds Anthropocentrism. Extinction will occur far faster for the human race due to our misuse and wasteful attitude towards the earth. As all animals go extinct and resources are depleted, humans will die off from lack of resources. Communist Gov solves. Premise 5Impact- Communist Economies are far greater than Capitalist economies. Premise 6Impact- Marxist-Engles Ideology is the only way to ensure a perfect Utopian society. Communist gov solves, Capitalist gov's lead to our downfall. Now onto Con's case. "Businesses under communist system have very strict limitations as to what they can and cannot do. "1) No warrant given for such a broad claim.2) Cross apply Premise 2. Market Socialism solves. Private sector still exists, which the public controls, and is free of government interference. So this unwarranted claim is false. "Communism makes fears in the minds of people. "Another unwarranted claim. No source given, no empirics, and nothing past a simple KGB argument my opponent makes. I'm arguing for the idea of a COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT NOT A USSR GOVERNMENT. He then brings up the Czechs. This is simply untrue, and no source has been given justifying this. "People are not allowed to fulfill their wishes and are not free to live. "1) Unwarranted Claim once again.2) Cross apply Market Socialism, Private Sector in a Communist gov solves.3) Extinction outweighs individual wants and needs. If you are alive you can still attain your appointed ends. So if you don't buy points 1 and 2, I'm still giving you a weighing mechanism. "Communism is a system that perpetually has no discretionary funds""You'd be surprised how fast buildings and infrastructure decay and collapse without private ownership. "1) Premise 2- Market Socialism SOLVES FOR THIS. The fact that my opponent fails to read a single part of my case is sad in itself, but I already proved the private sector exists, and private ownership exists in a Communist government, or CAN exist. "No civil rights. No free press. " 1) Premise 6, Communist Manifesto, says nothing about denying civil rights or freedom of the press. The government only obligation is to ensure the well being of it's people.2) My opponent fails to realize I'm talking about the Idea of a Communist government, not any actual government right now. This was made clear in my Analysis. HIS SOLVENCY- Democracy (Democratic Capitalism)1) Premise 3- War. I've already said war is bad, my opponent never contested this. Therefore it stands.2) Premise 4- Anthro leads to a faster extinction, which is ALWAYS bad.3) Premise 5- Communist Economies are better, plain and simple.4) Premise 1- Equality due to no Social Hierarchy or class structure, outweighs Democracy, which has a class structure. Now to his points on Democracy. "Safeguards the interests of the people:"1) Extinction is not in the best interest of the people.2) Premise 3 says Democratic Capitalists only care about the Economy moreso than the people. "Based on the principle of equality:"1) Not True, social structure exists2) There can be no equality if different people are on a different level in society. "Stability and responsibility in administration:"1) War2) Anthro3) Not true4) Empirics " Political education to the people:"1) Premise 6, the people have the Communist Manifesto, the very text that defines their government.2) My opponent doesn't prove there is no political education given to the people in a Communist regime. "Little chance of revolution:"1) War2) Anthro3) ExtinctionAll 3 of these outweigh, also, once again my opponent fails to give reasons to why if PERFECT communism were achived there would be a revolution. Stable government:1) Premises showing this to be untrue (Simply cross apply 1-5)2) No evidence given. HERE'S HOW THE ROUND DUMBS DOWN VOTERS:Analysis- Con fails to give any sources, and fails to attack pro in any way shape or form. Indirect clash isn't attacking my points, it's attacking the resolution. As such, Extend ALL OF THE PRO CASE. This alone means con CONCEDES to every single point made. Therefore these 6 premises are easy voters. Con Case- Rooted in Assumption, completely unwaranted and refuted. No sources were given, and con fails to attack Pro's case.