Hitler save lots of jews by kill them before starve and he have big dream. He nice person

First off, let me just say "bwahahahahaha" Alright now let us continue this debate. (and proof-read your post) Not true, no I can find no sources that clearly say this was within his ideology. This is a false assertion. (sorry I don't do strikeout text) And as far as we can see, he succeeded. Even this very debate, is a momentum to his immortality. This premise would be technically true if you proved it. Which you have not. When I think of Hitler I think of someone who is a sick and quickly aging man who doesn't even have proper control of his health not to mention his country. What genocides were the allies committing? We weren't going through and burning civilians in furnaces, we weren't capturing German troops and making them work in munitions factories until they just died off and we discarded them. Though this is "technically" a statement of immortality. When you live within History even in infamy that doesn't mean you as an individual are immortal. The Holocaust is immortal, Kristallnacht is immortal, Hitler's actions and personage are in association immortal. This is not why he shot himself however, he wanted to avoid being captured an potentially tortured and when faced with no alternatives shot himself. (or ran away) that's not courageous or brave and to me personally, shows that he couldn't own up to what he did. During the occupation of Poland. This is when the war started and Hitler came to power. This is of course AFTER the war actually started so that entire claim is false because it does NOT apply to the life of an average denizen BEFORE that time. Beyond that, yes resources were scarce after WWI however, the Jews weren't any worse off than anyone else. This is what happens when you rapidly expand an empire. Even if you are not a direct threat to a nation (I.E attacking its bordering nations) it is within reason that one or two powers join to "beat you back" and stop you from becoming too powerful. That is the basic jist to strategical warfare. ESPECIALLY when you start attacking her allies. Many countries were in agreement and still are that if they are to go to war, another country will join them. This is how it's been for literally thousands of years. All the way from Greek city-states. The war wouldn't of ended until Hitler ruled the world, let's be frank about that. The camps were populated primarily by Jews and people with distinct "unappealing" characteristics. P.O.W's, physical deformities, and mental or psychological abnormalities or deficiencies were what populated the camps. In fact, there were several instances where fleeing Jews were brought back and arrested, detained against their will despite being perfectly healthy and throw into the camp. Where in, many died just coming in through the front door. The infamous "left and right lines" where one led towards the camp, and the other led straight to an execution, that is not to stop disease, that is to get rid of the "weak and or unsuitable laborers" before you waste resources on them keeping them alive. Where other prison camps are a "tad" bit better than this. Where people have a place to bathe and live, even German P.O.W's weren't subjected to such inhumane conditions. These were established properties before the mass involvement of camps. Meaning they had plenty of time to build them and make them suitable for inhabitants. Not true, it means only that the camps would have expanded an become more numerous. Pretty sure operation Barbarossa wasn't a typo in the planning department. If that's true why continue to operate the camps and instead re assign the provisions to the forward companies. The quick answer is "to kill as many Jews as possible before the war ends." Not true, there were dozens of warlords throughout the ancient eras who used P.O.W's as troops, cannon fodder, and of course, leverage. There were at least 4 ways to use Jews and not just kill them off in camps that could of A: Helped Hitler's war effort or B:Given the Jews somewhere to go. Instead, Hitler just chose to kill them. . If not for Treaty of Versaille, the World War 2 would never take place, again it depends, many people contend that it was going to happen anyway just because Germany had the power an ambition to expand. The treaty in most respects, just made the process harder and take longer. That has nothing to do with that argument. in fact more inmates died of bacterial disease over anything and that's literally just because of the conditions they were kept in. Not the food they were consuming. Typhus, typhoid, and dysentery were the popular among the highest fatality rates in each death camp. So no, again there were treatments for typhoid an typhus and even dysentery. However, too many sick people and too few healthy individuals to help them meant yes most unfortunately fell victim to their illness. They're not wild animals and they were fighting a war. They were soldiers, not doctors, there is only so much help they can give and frankly, it's the same in every war, you run into new problems and at first, people aren't sure why others are still dying and getting sick. Of course after they figured out the causes, they fixed them, however when you see a starving person the first thing you want to do is give them food, most people wouldn't know this can still kill you if you're not careful. Even in today's society. (...) Die jetzt noch lachen, werden in einiger Zeit vielleicht auch nicht mehr lachen. Diese Welle wird sich "ber Europa hinaus "ber die ganze Welt verbreiten."(...) - 8. November 1942 Loose translation: Remember when I said the Jews would wage war to eradicate the European race, but is the Europeans who will eradicate the Jews. everyone laughed at me, and many aren't laughing anymore. Those who laugh now will soon no longer be laughing. The last sentence is what's close: This wave [of not laughing anymore] will focus on Europe and spread over the whole world. (I'll put the source in the Comments section, it's too long for my post here) [1] What the HELL is this? This is a debate note an advertising area, I'm going to report this to the site admin. Totally unacceptable, refrain from doing this again. Not every order is written, especially when you try to keep it secret. There were also no documents that plainly stated that the construction of the extermination camps was to become a thing. Yet, the propaganda films and sites show that they camps do indeed exist and would of needed an enormous amount of money to fund which only Hitler could commend. Your argument is one that every Holocaust denier uses an was debunked ages ago. Millions of individuals being relocated. Thousands of miles of tracks being built, huge sums of money going into different programs and Hitler runs the show. He knew, deal with it. Hitler chose Himmler in all regards you posted because of his ruthless nature. He knew that Himmler would do the best job possible, and you notice that even as the war came towards a close and Hitler ordered the camps be destroyed he didn't react any differently to the situation. If I was leading a war and I found out my right hand man had killed millions of innocent people instead of doing what I trusted him to do, I certainly wouldn't be so calm about the issue and choose to do what he did. The logic portrayed by his actions aren't one of an innocent man. There were no morally justified reasons for Hitler's actions. Even in loving Germany, creating jobs, and reestablish his economy he did so by lying, stealing, imprisonment, and using scare tactics. That is not someone who has a morally well set compass those are the acts of a power hungry tyrant which is exactly what Hitler was. He wanted Germany to be the top dog, he made a lot of mistakes, he should of died earlier, he wasn't brave, he wasn't strong or healthy. He was a monster, a tyrant, a warlord, and one who only sought to further his own cause the best he could.