There should be more Moderators on DDO

The most beneficial use of increased number of moderators will be to sort an organize content on DDO. Here are some examples of where a volunteer moderator has benenfited the site by using a forum to oganize content. The Mafia and Fate Mod lists.http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org... Theese two list are beneficial to keep the Games organized and provide an outlet for the game makers to be curteous to one another in the spirit of community. F-16 has even created a list of old mafia games that is consolidated and easy to navigate. http://www.debate.org...I bring up thes mafia games because I believe they are prime example of how a number of Moderators can work together in an organized manner to create better content for the site.The Priority of ModeratorsI am not a moderator, but here is my list of priorities of what I believe the moderators should focus on.-Abusive Users - Users who continuously abuse the site rules and TOS.-Abusive Content- Content that detracts from the integrity of the site. I.E.posts that include advertising, Harrasment, or other malcontent. -New User Assistance- When new users join there should be people who are willing to help them out.-Making the site better- upgrading the site's features, making voting better, adding team debates, moderating tournaments. Stickying posts to the forums.-Organizing the site content.-There are multiple areas of this site where content organization should happen quickly. It is my belief that this is not happening because there are too many other issues that are prioritized above organization. Airmax and Ore_ele are busy assisting new users, resolving conflicts among members, and ensuring that voting privlages are used appropriately. There isn't any time to go through the pleathora of content and make it more easily siftable. The moderators as they currently standI believe that is inherent in human nature that no moderator will be completely honest in thier dealings as an individual. But a team of moderators would be able to group think and come to reasonble conclusions that are as a whole beneficial to the site. Although I have full faith and confidence in the current moderators abilities and interest to act in favor of DDO, they are subject to thier own personal views. In the short time that I have been here, Both Airmax and Ore_Ele have been accused of agregious mis-uses of thier assignments. Some of the accusations have included favoritism towards certain abusive users, harsh punishments against unliked users, over all acting unpofessionally. A group of 5 moderators would provide a level accountability for the moderators to act professionaly towards the users, and an outlet for users who have been wronged by other moderators to vent thier frustration in a professional and contributory manner, rather than post explitive forums. When the forums are being used as a retaliation measure, it isn't good for the site. The moderators as they could be with a team of 5 With a group of individuals become a social group they begin to create rules and design systems which a culture of the way they operate. A group of five people can keep each member of the group more honest because the individuals are likely to fear being rejected by the group. When there are 5 members on a team, the members are likely to know the responsibilities of the other team member and the ability to replace a rouge member is easier and more desireable than allowing a permanantly corrupt member to continue. Have you ever tried to tell your best friend that something was wrong? It never works out. You lose a friend and they still do whatever it was that they wanted to do in the first place. Let's say the Ore_ele did something and Airmax doesn't like. Airmax and Ore_ele are best friends do you think that one disagreement is going to cause them to stop being friends? I don't. Even if one did do something wrong, the bond between the two cannot be broken by tattle taling on the offending moderator. However, if there are team of five, the individuals are more likely to hold the culture in higher prestige than they do other individuals.