In fact there is not one real contradiction in scripture.

Pro concedes to Cons’ challenge, resolution solved in roundtwo. Pro’s claim was “In fact there is not one real contradiction in scripture”and this debate fulcrum now pivots against itself. Con QUOTES Pro: “yes errors raise apparent contradictions, but that is mypoint, don't forget that my assertion is that there are no REAL contradiction.” Sorry Pro, but errors in an inerrant word is the epitome ofcontraction especially when they come from an all-knowing all-powerful inerrantgod. Error in an inerrant word of god means, god couldn’t get hisword out correctly. The inerrancy of god is eroded? This is contradiction whenthere is no room for error, god errors by letting man error OR god errors onhis own. Either way, this is contradiction of and in the bible. Pro’s diatribe goes on how all but his denominationalbeliefs are irrelevant as they pertain to Christianity. I QUOTE Pro: “I speak only fortrue Christianity not the 38,000 or so fake, counterfeit versions that merelycall themselves Christian, or as Jesus said, teach and preach in his name butprove false to his teachings (Matthew 7:21-23 again).” Pro offers a bible verse which does not support his claim,which does not discredit the remaining 37999 Christian denominations. The pointis this, Pro see’s the contradiction in his fellow Christians, and Pro see’sthe contradiction in the bible. However, Pro refuses to see the contradictionin his god, so he makes up apologies for the bible and tries fruitlessly to convincehis audience of his piousness and superiority. Pro uses the bible to give creedhis claims by using verses of the bible to credit the bible. It works like this, Superman is real, because the DailyPlanet says so, if this were not true, then why is there such a thing as Kryptonitelike the Daily Planet says there is? Apologetics are a religious creation intended to defendbeliefs that cannot defend themselves. Apologetics are also a religiouscreation intended to defend scriptures found in the bible that cannot defendthemselves as well. ‘IF’ the bible needed no defense, “’IF’ the bible wasn’tcontradictory and needed no defense, no apologetics would be necessary in thefirst place and therefore never have existed. But apologetics do exist, theyARE needed and there is not one place in the bible they are not used. Pro refuses to answer question like> “is Jesus man, god,god and man, son of man, son of god, son of god and man because no matter whathis choice, it is in direct conflict with one passage or another. The bible effectivelyclaims all of the options above as true, but it fails to denounce anyone beliefabout Jesus over the other. The only answer that doesn’t contradict itself isthis> “the bible doesn’t make clear who Jesus was.” Now this answer is inconflict with Pros’ position as a Christian and as he interprets the bible. Pro offers adistraction and I QUOTE> two scripture that appear to contradict becausethey have been mistranslated are not real contradictions, only apparent one. AsI have said before that is how you know you have the true meaning, because whenyou have the "contradiction" vanishes.” Sorry Pro, I count 1127 acts and or justifications for evilviolent acts and only 224 mentions of love and some of these remain dubiousgiving no congress to the claim of a Peaceful, loving Jesus’s preaching’s thatdistinguish you from any other Christian. In fact, I find more bible scripturesthat supports your brethren Adolf Hitler and his claims than I do yours makinghim more likely to be the true depiction of Christianity. Sorry Pro, I don’t mean to sound like I am putting you down,but the bible contradicts your beliefs that ‘it is a good book meant for good people’ andif you really understood the bible, its origins, its history and why it wascreated you would know this. I could now move on and post enough bible contradictions tofill the next dozen debates, but I don’t really need to because Pro’s positioncannot overcome what he has just posted concerning his own personal biblecontradictions. Pro admits to errors in the inerrant bible as the word of god,as sourced by god….and this is a CONTRADICTION and I only need one to win thisdebate. The advantage was always mine, you see I am an atheist as Isee no evidence of the one true god’s (<this spelling is correct by the way, it is written as shown in the Jewish bibleprior to its being editing into the O/T). Pro is a Christian who denies atleast 37999 versions of a Christian god which makes him more of an atheist thanI am. Glossary: Apologetics (from Greek O36;πολογ^3;α, "speaking in defense") is the discipline of defending a position(often religious) through the systematic use of information. Early Christianwriters (c. 120–220) who defended their faith against critics and recommendedtheir faith to outsiders were called apologists.[1 noun [treated as singular or plural] reasoned arguments or writings injustification of something, typically a theory or religious doctrine:apologetics for the slave trade are quite out of order Origin: mid-18th century: from apologetic In short, used for recruitment and defense of the faith. http://oxforddictionaries.com...... http://dictionary.cambridge.org...... Faith: high degree of trust or confidence in something or someone. Belief without evidence to support this belief. 2 Astrong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual convictionrather than proof: bereaved people who have shown supreme faith. In short, anirrational thought process that has given no reason to have been believed in inthe first place. http://oxforddictionaries.com...... Summary in one paragraph: Eight contradicting bibles, an O/T cut down from 24 books to4 in order to hide contradictions, the contradictions of who and what Jesus is,the contradictions of 38000 different interpretations found in 38000 Christiandenominations and Pros position unable to move on from where we are at now, andof course, the error pro admits to.