The Abortion of a Fetus is NEVER Moral NOR and Imperative

Alright lets begin. Let have fun and debate not argue! Big difference between the two, in a debate the two parties should learn from each other and end the debater more knowledgeable about both sides of the topic. An argument is not concern with education, fairness and most importantly RESPECT! BURDEN OF PROOF: 1) The AFF has to prove that an abortion is NEVER moral. 2) The AFF has to prove that an abortion is also NEVER imperative. 3) The NEG has to prove that an abortion is moral. 4) The NEG has to prove that an abortion is imperative. DEFINITIONS: 1) I agree with my opponents Definitions. I offer one definitions; Never: not ever, at no time, not in any degree or not under any condition. http://www.merriam-webster.com... SCENARIO: 1) I agree with the scenario of Jessica pregnancy. 2) I disagree with the fetus being nonviable; a) This gives to much ground to the AFF and limits fairness. b) We should agree to not give an age to the fetus and that the fetus is healthy but due to factors not of the baby's cause. CONTENTION (S): 1) What is moral? Ask yourself this question? Write down what you think and then compare this list of morally correct ideas with all of your friends, family and the people you walk by down the street. Have these people agree to all of what is on this moral list. I'll save you some time and tell you it will be impossible! Not every man, woman or child believes the same thing as you. Because you, and I repeat only you alone, agree with your moral list completely what you believe is never moral. The resolution is worded with never, which means not in any degree or not under any condition. So unless you can get all 6 billion humans in the world to agree with your list under any degree or under any condition what you believe is moral is never really moral. The point I am making is their are personal truths and universal truths. Personally my opponent feels that an abortion is completely moral in the Jessica situation, but since I disagree this truth or moral is not universal and thus does not completely encompass the entire moral spectrum. Therefore no matter what my opponents says what he believes moral is never truthfully moral. 2) The above argument also concerns the idea of imperative. The opponent idea of imperative is personally his own and not that of an universal imperative. An unavoidable obligation or requirement is a contract written in blood or chiseled in stone. Or written with urine in the snow. The essence of what is an unavoidable obligation is entirely legitimate to the party that is obligated and the party subject to that of the obligation. Thus in the scenario of Jessica and her fetus the imperative is that of the actors in the scenario, not that of I or my opponent. He can say their is a imperative to abort the child, but this a claim only proven by a warrant or moral of his personally truth that impacts only to his liking. Since the resolution stress an universal morality that is never disagreed upon we can simply smile and nod to my opponents logic and deem us none actors irrelevant to the scenario. 3) Cause and effect of human action is burden with the entire or no responsibility placed on the actor. a) The actor is entirely responsible for what he/she caused and the effect. b) The actor is not responsible for a cause not of his/her hand and thus not the effect as well. Unless I shoot someone (cause) and the person dies (effect) I am responsible for murder. But If I see one struggling out at sea to keep their head above water and water fills their lungs (cause) the person drowns (effect) I am not responsible for the swimmer's death. Thus to let Jessica die by not aborting the fetus you are not murdering two people or nor are you responsible for their deaths. Summary: 1) A universal truth and a personal truth will never be the same. 2) A imperative is relative, and thus never universal. 3) No matter what the opponent says he can't prove the abortion of a fetus is moral and an Imperative because these factors are not universal, since my opponent has to prove the opposite to never which is always or universal. 4) Murder and natural death are never the same.