The Nazis were not racist (or they were racist against white Nordics)

Your arguments are unimpressive. I gave you a paper to show you some proof that they killed Jews. Then I gave you Schopenhauer, Hitler’s hero, and you tell me “that is a source from the modern day, in this country…We're allowing anyone to have doctorates in anything. So sorry it doesn't work”, and gave no legitimate reply showing I was wrong.I never denied that Hitler killed the Jews. I only said that Hitler did it as a matter of religious hatred. Jewish is not a race. It's a religion. Schopenhauer’s quote was meant to show off White Supremacy, not Nordic-supremacy.I never argued otherwise. No, Nordic-supremacy was with Hans F. K. Günther, Nazi thinker, who I quoted in the book I named before the quote, “Short Ethnology of the German People”.I want a link to the book. Your response to video proof, “For all we know this video could be a charlatan being paid to speak nonsense” is laughable. For all I know you are a charlatan being paid to speak nonsense! Again, no legitimate reply.If that's so, then how come I'm not on TV having my 15 minutes of fame, like that guy? How about you find me some honest footage showing Hitler saying “We hate the Nordic people!” or whatever you think.No, I gave you a challenge to find a video in which Hitler said anything praising the Nordic race. Or an article talking about Hitler's love of Nordicism, from the 1940s. You failed to deliver.I have no idea what you mean when you say “they look Roman”.The ships in the video looked Roman. The ladies carrying the torch looked like Roman mistresses. You keep telling me to find footage and yet I see a flimsy argument coming from your side. I have the originator of Nazi thought saying “We wish to keep the thought always before us that, if our race is not to perish, it is a question of not choosing a Nordic mate, but over and above this, of helping our race through our marriage to a victorious birth rate”, and you have nothing.Again, no book was displayed. I never said Hitler didn’t call himself a Catholic. Do you honestly think he considered himself a Catholic? Or was it to get votes. The latter is considerably more logical. A Catholic doesn’t murder people en masse. I should know, I was one for a time.http://www.redicecreations.com...http://www.flyingchariotministries.com...http://i43.photobucket.com...;(pope signing Nazi papers) “In fact, the Allied countries committed rape, which many Italians hold against them to this day”, to my knowledge, Russia was the only Ally that got busted for raping and pillaging. I don’t see why Italians would hold anything against them, the Germans don’t hold much against anybody at this point.http://tomatobubble.com...A movie showcasing Allied (UK) rape of Italy “As the for the Gypsies, Hitler probably had a vandetta against them. That's hatred, but not racial contempt that the KKK and Nordics displayed.” I think this is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read as a defence. It’s racial contempt. They were considered sub-human and inferior and were exterminated, some 1 Million of them. That’s targeted racial extermination. They would take measurements of their skulls and noses and then round them up and kill them.“...The aim of measures taken by the State to defend the homogeneity of the German nation must be the physical separation of Gypsydom from the German nation, the prevention of miscegenation, and finally, the regulation of the way of life of pure and part-Gypsies.”- Heinrich Himmler I never denied that the Nazis hated Gypsies.I’ll post some intriguing quotes from some Nazi documents below:“From the seizure of power to December 31, 1942 the concentration camps saw: 73,417 admissions of Jewsof those36,943 were released27,347 departed through death”“It is very difficult for me in a letter to explain what I consider to be the realities of the Jewish situation in Germany…The Secret Police has set up, in conjunction with the Jewish Community, certain immigration offices which are preparing in Berlin 180 - 200 people a day for emigration…There can, of course, be only an internal solution of the Jewish problem in Germany, and I believe they are preparing to solve the problem in this way. It will, of course, consist in placing all the able-bodied Jews in work camps, confiscating the wealth of the entire Jewish population, isolating them, and putting additional pressure on the whole community, and getting rid of as many as they can by force.”Nothing is said about Jews as a race. Just how they're a "problem." “The nationality of the prisoner [in Auschwitz] is indicated by initial letters (i.e., P for Pole, etc.) placed inside the triangle. The colors of the triangles indicating the various categories are:The operative word here is "nationality," not "race." red — political protective custodygreen — incorrigible criminalblack — work derelict (mostly Russians)pink — Homosexualspurple — member of the sect of Bible Researchers”Hitler hated gay men mostly. Saw them as effiminate.“A Jew cannot be a citizen of the Reich. He has no right to vote in political affairs, he cannot occupy a public office.”There's still nothing about race.Knock yourself out, here are the documents: http://ghdi.ghi-dc.org......http://ghdi.ghi-dc.org......http://ghdi.ghi-dc.org......http://ghdi.ghi-dc.org......http://ghdi.ghi-dc.org...... Nothing here about race is mentioned. Your argument for the Nazi’s not being racist are shattered. They were quite racist. I don’t know where you got the idea that they were not racist. It’s bizarre and unfounded; you have very little truth, mostly stretched out coincidences. I don’t know why you are so staunchly anti-American, I'm not anti-American. I'm just saying that American education has been severly dumbed down.but you are starting to smell like a Nazi sympathizer, and my patience for this debate has just about run out.It's a fact I'm very proud of. I also am smart enough to know that Nazism is not Nordic at all. That's a title for the KKK, not the Nazis, who were mostly Roman Catholics and southern Germans. I'm done arguing with you.