BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
All Human Beings (Including You) Are Obsessed with God

All human beings -- including you -- are obsessed with God. Someone wrote: "Also consider that other religions never give him a second thought, such as Taoism and Hinduism" First of all, religions cannot think -- only people can think. Also, Hindu is an ethnicity, not a religion or a faith. Here are just a few examples, provided by my opponent, of people exhibiting obsession with God: A) The Boy Scout Oath: "And Do My Duty To God And My Country" B) The Pledge Of Allegiance: "One Nation Under God" All human beings, including my opponent, are obsessed with God. My opponent has chosen to engage in a debate about God specifically because he is obsessed with God, just as all other human beings are obsessed with God. Believers in atheist Dogma think about God all the time -- how strange! If they actually believed that God didn't exist, then they would never give him a second thought. The belief in atheist Dogma is not motivated by any valid argument or evidence -- it is motivated solely by an irrational hatred for God. In fact, God has made his factual existence known, with absolute certainty, to all human beings: All believers in atheist Dogma are constantly thinking about God, all agnostics are constantly thinking about God, and all Theists and Theological Realists are also constantly thinking about God too: All human beings, without exception, are constantly thinking about God, day in and day out, and the only rational explanation for this fact is that God actually exists in reality and the belief in atheist Dogma is false.
All Human Beings (Including You) Are Obsessed with God

The atheists only think of ideas such as the so-called 'God' when he has been mentioned, or when passing his churches, as the buildings and words are mentally linked to the idea, so by thinking of one, you think of the other. No one is really obsessed with him, even the most devout people, including you, think of him when you want something, or you are praying for your food, thanking him for the things farmers gave you. How bad they must feel. If everyone was obsessed with him, no work would ever be done, and humanity would be unable to support itself. Also consider that other religions never give him a second thought, such as Taoism and Hinduism The only reason people in some countries think about him so much is because he is mentioned in so much: A) The Boy Scout Oath: "And Do My Duty To God And My Country" B) The Pledge Of Allegiance: "One Nation Under God" So, no one is totally obsessed with him, and the most devout don't think of him all the time
All Human Beings (Including You) Are Obsessed with God

Believers in atheist Dogma think about God all the time -- how strange! If they actually believed that God didn't exist, then they would never give him a second thought. The belief in atheist Dogma is not motivated by any valid argument or evidence -- it is motivated solely by an irrational hatred for God. In fact, God has made his factual existence known, with absolute certainty, to all human beings: All believers in atheist Dogma are constantly thinking about God, all agnostics are constantly thinking about God, and all Theists and Theological Realists are also constantly thinking about God too: All human beings, without exception, are constantly thinking about God, day in and day out, and the only rational explanation for this fact is that God actually exists in reality and the belief in atheist Dogma is false. No matter what your worldview, it is truly and undeniably ALL ABOUT GOD. Related short video:
God does exist

Being that Con has posted nothing beyond his initial argument, I suggest that there is no question that Con should lose this debate. I must say that I am thoroughly disappointed that Con didn't attempt any rebuttal, and this should warrant the loss of the conduct point. In summary, Con violated their own terms of the debate, and used the Bible for the bulk of his argument, which was specifically restricted from being used as proof. In addition, Con's arguments did nothing to disprove God, and only disproved the Bible if taken in a literal sense. The result is that Con's argument fails to address the main point of this debate: Does God Exist?
There Exists an Objective Morality

-------------WARNING! GRAPHIC IMAGERY SUGGESTED!------------------------------------------------------- You can't say that subjectivity is objectivity simply die to the fact that the means by which subjectivity is achieved is objectively observable. That's like saying that a poo is a bodily system because it comes form a bodily system. Subjectivity is not objective just because human mind is objectively observable like just it's stupid. If my opponent is debating subjectivity not existing altogether he should refer to a debate regarding monism vs dualism. This is just a debate ont hat there is an objective morality but this debate is just stupidly impossible if there exists no such thing as subjectivity. The fact is that feelings, empathy and compassion is all morality is. How else to knoe if it is good to rape your mother? To molest a baby is objectively alright, especially if not lasting damage is left. I mean to be graphic just shove your fingers willy nilly any hole any time WHY NOT?! Well that is DISGUSTING, YUCK! But objectively we can't truly explain why. Consent doesn't objectively exist. You could go to a five year old girl, beat her up, capture her and imprison her in your basement feed her minimal food and rape her for life and maybe use her as a breeding tool for your own DNA to be passed on genetically, always dumping the children on people's doorsteps and saying OH! LOOK AT ME! I'm not hurting the child, I'm just allowing it to exist. Well that is just horrible and you are a real person if you tink that is OK. Just go be Hitler and what not then, kill people of a certain religion or race, enslave them, whip them, mock them, humiliate them inf act why not eat them alive? Just so horrible and stupid is objective morality that to be honest you are insane to believe in it. Insane: of, pertaining to, or characteristic of a person who is mentally deranged.[1] Molesting and raping young girls or even anyone: HORRIBLE AND DISGUSTING!!!!![2] TO THIS THE PRO MUST DEFINITELY EXPLAIN THEMSELVES! HOW DARE THEY?! Sources: [1] http://dictionary.reference.com... [2] Humanity's caring part of their nature.
There Exists an Objective Morality

Resolution: There exists an objective morality.This should not be confused with the resolution "All morality is objective." All that I need to do to meet my burden of proof is to prove that morality of an objective nature exists, regardless of the number of cases of such a thing existing. Definitions: A definition of "objectivity" we will not use: "A proposition is generally considered to be objectively true when its truth conditions are met and are "'mind-independent'—that is, existing freely or independently from the thoughts of a conscious entity or subject." [1] The problem with this definition (for the purpose of this debate) is its semantic ambiguity. It is indisputable that morality is derived from the human thought process; it would be absurd to defend the idea that morality is an entity that exists outside of the mind. But, at the same time, thoughts are objective biological functions, and my argument will delve into this matter. Hence, this definition is not suitable, within the context of this debate.A definition of "objectivity" we will use: "Objective reality is whatever remains true whether you believe in it or not." [2] This definition establishes that objectivity exists regardless of whether beliefs reflect the idea that it exists or not. Furthermore, unlike the last definition, it omits a flawed interpretation: that something that is directly connected with beliefs/thoughts, as morality is, make it non-objective. Morality: (n) "...the differentiation of intentions, decisions, and actions between those that are good (or right) and those that are bad (or wrong.)" [3] ---I will not post my argument, so that my opponent and I have an equal four rounds to argue our cases. Rather than making this into a debate of semantics, post any concerns about definitions and terms of debate in the comments section. Thank you.---[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://www.geek-central.gen.nz...[3] http://en.wikipedia.org...
There Exists an Objective Morality

The opponent has pretty much dropped all of the categorized arguments made before... I will just make new categories for the opponent's new refutations. Let it be known that many of my points have gone unrefuted. Also, let it be known that the opponent's second source in this round is not a real source. Semantics From Round 1: A definition of "objectivity" we will use: "Objective reality is whatever remains true whether you believe in it or not." [1] “To believe” is “to think.” “Moral beliefs” are a type of belief. Thoughts objectively exist. Moral beliefs objectively exist. Is it true that beliefs exist regardless of whether or not we believe they do? Yes, it is. Moral beliefs exist regardless of whether we believe they do. And when we take a step further in my syllogism, we take into account the fact that morality has been stratified through the limits of our brain structure, as a result of evolutionary development. Morality has an objective, standardized basis. --- A Graphic Argument The opponent asks questions like “Why do we not rape our mothers?” I cannot say that anything is "objectively right" or "objectively wrong," since I'm not the moral absolutist that the opponent thinks I am. With that in mind, I have no clue why RationalMadman does not rape his mother. Morality is a conglomerate of not only innate biological traits, but also social construction (e.g., upbringing.) Each moral belief is sculpted and changed due to a lot of factors. At the same time, RationalMadman’s views on raping his mother are not very germane to the matter at hand, since it indirectly addresses the argument I have made. There is no single view on incestual rape, but our brains are biologically set to uphold specific beliefs on the matter. Perhaps the altruistic function of our brain tells us not to, and that puts us at a biological disposition? Perhaps the “family attachment” function we have biologically shifts us away from it? In the end, though, our moral views are certainly formed on an objective, biological basis, whether we stray away from this basis due to social construction or not. [1] http://www.debate.org...
Epic Rap Battles of History Personas : (pro)Ajab vs (con)Progressive Dem

Seriously Prog your rhymes are as pathetic as truth_seekers. In this last round, I'll spit dope rhymes that appeal to the voters. Dickk jokes can only carry you so far in a diss rap battle And why do you even care about your dickk size, you asexual? Yeah, I "tied" a debate with the erotic poet Colin Dean. It took five of you idiots votebombing me and me win record still came up clean! Seriously Prog if this is the best you can do, I'm really disappointed in you son. I'm tempted to just leave this battle because everyone knows I already won. I beat you worse than Mikal beat you in that song debate. And you can't just shrug off my insults by saying "haters gonna hate". Know why? Because they're all true, and to you they hurt. But it's okay, just run away from DDO and continue to lurk. You say that I'm a broken record? You're the one who always talks about economics, nerd. I doubt you even understood half my attacks. I'm going to get more votes than thett3 has had cats! Seriously, your imagery here doesn't even make sense, But I don't know what I expected, when it's you I'm going up against. Nice try going after my IQ, but we all know that it's enormous. I have 5 tests to back me up, your argument is just preposterous. If you hate broken records so much, why don't you ever shut up? This is your entire contribution to the site you putz: May I lick your balls, Mikal? Would you like to take a second to talk about Keynes? You're like a Mormon missionary bro, except your holy book is more than just stupid, it's boring and plain. This is Ajab signing off, dropping the mic and walking away, Khuda Hafiz, b!tch!
Epic Rap Battles of History Personas : (pro)Ajab vs (con)Progressive Dem

It's surprising you start with saying kunt, because you have no idea what one is The one time we talked about it you were like WTF, it was almost like a pop quiz I mean look at your fist round, fuk, kunt, blush, and bush, not one those things even remotely rhymes The only thing your proved is that your IQ is as low as your self worth, that should literally be a crime Fault, art , them , win this is just becoming painful to read. Why are you even trying at this point, just do me a favor concede Keynes, Keynes. keynes you broken record sounding stupid son of a btch You puked so much when you saw angel of death in a bikini, that they had to give your throat a stitch Lost to Mestari? that's an understatement, you got trolled and got beat down like that the btch you are Tim went superman on you and hit you so hard, he put you out like a burning star Your not a master of philosophy, you can't even beat shakuntala in debate After he beat you he wrote a story about how he left cum stains on your face for a low rate I recall reading vivid poetry, something about showers of cum and explosive vagina stars This guy is one of the worst poets in history, and you tied with him that should leave some scars Sometimes i think I hate you because you are a depressing, self centered, egoistical little twit I wish I could say more but this round is coming to an end and it wont fit, its similar to my dick
Epic Rap Battles of History Personas : (pro)Ajab vs (con)Progressive Dem

Don't talk about Kant, Obama worshipping fuckkYou know so little about him, you'd probably pronounce it KuntAjab on the mic, knocking you down so far you'll blushAnd say "Damn, I'm lower than the DOW under Bush..."If the voters didn't unerstand my argument, that is not my fault. They're all so idiotic that they should stay focused on art. A vote against me from people as foolish and ignorant as themLet's just say, I consider a vote like that to be a win. I'm a brilliant mind the likes of which cannot be contained. And no, Prog, that's nothing like your Lord Keynes. When I'm rich and famous people will read this and smileAnd say "Wow he destroyed that idiot Prog by a mile".Yes it's true, I puke at the sight of minors showing me their bodies.They are simply so ugly compared to the girls I have in real life calling me a hottie. Seriously, have you seen me? My beard is incredible! My eyes are like a window into my soul, and it's great!What about you Prog? I'd mock your looks, but you're too much of a bittch to show your face!I'm going to do to you what Bluesteel did to Izbo. Put you on trial, win, and you go down in legend as a bozo.You'll rage harder than Jifpop, and get as many votes for president tooJust go back to worshipping Mikal bro, you good for nothing noob.I already know what my opponents got to say about me, preemptively.Taking it out. Yeah, I did lose a live debate to Tim but at least he was trolling.And I'm willing to debate people who aren't 1900 ELO noobs.I have balls, humility, and intelligence even if I don't like seeing boobs. I'm surprised you even agreed to this battle, honestly. I'm glad you did though, you could use some company. Feel better bro, we accept you for who you are.A sad little nerd who will never be an economic star.
Epic Rap Battles of History Personas : (pro)Ajab vs (con)Progressive Dem

You read kant and worship him but you don't get I called your life irrelevant and self centered. I put you in a category and labeled you egoistical, FTs meta could be your mentor Calling my dick tiny man, it's as long as your ego and stings people like a mosquito Why do you think im a social liberal, Im half black and my dick is as thick as a burrito I'm going to pull a thett3 on you and sacrifice myself and make this a total slaughter My fingers going to hit your face, and by the end of this ride i'm going to chant for my father You want to be a proper philosopher but you have the mindset of a toddler you think you have the mind of a scholar, but this is like comparing a euro to a dollar Multi accounts to vote on this debate, you're the one that begs for votes Spamming people to no end when you objectively lose so sit back and take some notes Roy beat you so bad he left you up the creek with a battle and stole your boat He rammed your own ontological argument in your face so hard that he taught you to deepthroat Every time you get in a fight you hop on the forums and preach that you want to learn meekness You lie to people non stop and then expect to beat me, btch please i know your weakness[1] So much vomit coming out it's a ceaseless sequence now your staring speechless How can you expect to win a battle when i know your faults so much that i could write a thesis Your put your self on a higher plane of humanity than the rest of mankind You think your such a genius that your mind is perfectly designed and not confined It's like you think you took the pill from limitless and your intelligence was refined[2] But the pill you took was a placebo and your actually blind Read that fuking last bar and tell me how you have a chance to win You call Denny a friend but he showed you his azz and you puked again I commend you for trying to break every trend and mend and befriend to try and blend in I'm sorry I started to offend and condescend but you can't even contend, this is just like the movie i'm about to transcend I was going to do this live via google but my gf kills everything sometimes lol The last bars were killer when I tried them vocally, I actually had a beat for it too. One day when I am actually able to talk :/ [1] http://www.mandatory.com... [2] http://www.imdb.com...
Epic Rap Battles of History Personas : (pro)Ajab vs (con)Progressive Dem

Wow Prog, is that the best you can do? Seriously man, that round was pathetic.I wasn't insulted at all. I'm a categorical imperative? What? I don't get it. Your lines are as pathetic as your debates you noob little sniper.Seriously, learn to actually debate before messing with your afflicter.I'll punish you so badly you'll feel like a homosexual in my country When you lose this round 100-0, you'll be like "people don't judge me!"Well you're way too late bro, that ship already sailed, On DDO you're a joke, an example of a member who failed.I've seen GWL make arguments more coherent than yours, so keep enjoying that silver spoon you punk Do you even understand anything you say, or are you just quoting from The General Theory--uncrusted as it is with your spunk?I'll be on you like gulab to jamun, progessively crushing your democratic asss twenty two times, You'll lose this battle worse than your party lose the 1984 election, dying when I bust a rhyme.Like Izbo, I've shown incredibly restraint in the face of unrelenting stupidity I'm a master, I have better things to do than respond to your inhumitity Economic atheist eh? Don't make me laugh bro, we all know Bernanke is your Father,Yellen is your Jesus, and Keynes is your Holy Spirit. It's the unholy trinity of quantitative easers.Once again I ask, who on DDO has your back bro? Kitty is my Kutti, Dennis is my bestie, who likes you, hoe?No one? That's what I thought. I'm only doing this battle out of pity.I know you need some attention because your life really is that shittty.You'd better go and pull an Aperion and get your multis to vote on this ddebate. Or just run away like a tenant without rent.You're sure to lose. I'm unbeatable, irrefutable: when I lose it's because the judge didn't understand my argument.VTL Prog. FOS on Prog for being such a little bitch in this mafia game.Just kidding. If being a little bitch was your scumtell, mafia would always be in pain. Your IQ hangs as low as your dick, eh? So it's tiny then? Hai hai hai! Now sit down my weak little friend,And just shut up until this battle ends.
Epic Rap Battles of History Personas : (pro)Ajab vs (con)Progressive Dem

What you talking about ajab, progs the name and my relationship with GCL is swell I'm going to open you up like one of the vaginas i've never seen, and then ask whats that smell Comparing us is like comparing computers, your an old apple and i'm a brand new dell Im bout to do do some dragon ball z sht, i'm going to put your freeza in a cell[1] You want to compare IQS?, mine hangs as low as my D**k They're both kind of thick, and are as solid as a brick My thoughts are like my semen, they come out way to quick If your IQ is so high, why do you never shave your stick, your just a fuking prick Oh you mean liz, the person you called the cancer of the site The thing provoked pots into action and then started a brand new fight It was muslim vs muslim, it was literally quite the sight Pot's popped that viking swag, and ended you with his might You seem to like kant so much but if he saw you, he would say your a categorical imperative your messing with someone that will show that your not even relative when its comparative This battle was over before it started, it was a pre determined narrative Just do division, I'm a plus and your a minus that should show you that your a negative. I've left the site before but never because I lost a debate The moment you challenged roy it was sealing your fate He's like a well well armored plate and your arguments did not translate That battle does the same thing girls to do you, when you see them you lose weight [2] You are God?, I guess you are whipping out some of that plimsoll sht. Im an economic atheist, literal knowledge and facts is something I emit Why even take this battle when you already lost, you should have just quit This is another debate you lost, so get ready to blame the voters and throw a fit Sorry man, no one has your back because its fact your a hack You like to distract and redact the things you say and that sht is totally wack You don't sexually impact anything and you lack any tact and pretend your a class act If you subtract your impact you come up with the fact that your arguments are cracked [1] http://dragonball.wikia.com... [2] http://giphy.com...