Noah's Ark Could Not Have Happened

I, pro, will be arguing on the fact that the worldwide flood as said in the Bible is actually false. First, ground rules. Due to terrible debates lately, the rules will be strict.Format:Round 1: Arguments Round 2: Rebuttals, and one argument (or none)Round 3: Rebuttals and polishing.By accepting this debate, you agree that if you break this format, you get a loss of a conduct point.Rules:No swearingNo personal attacks No forfeitingNo using arguments that are not proven, like: "God found a way because he is all-knowing."By accepting this debate, you agree that if any of these rules are broken, it will count as a full vote for the side that did not break the rules. Now for my arguments.First off, we look at the main problem. The animals. How could they all travel to the point of the ark? It would've been impossible due to the fact that the animals may have had to travel hundreds, even thousands, of miles to get to the ark. Even if they somehow were magically able to come within a few miles of the ark spontaneously, how would they not hunt each other to extinction? For example, if two tigers and two snakes are accompanied by two zebras and two mice, what do you think is going to happen? It would be the animals' natural instinct to hunt. What makes this even worse is that they were all stuck on the ship together. Surely they would've eaten eachother, right? That brings us to our next problem.That would be their diet. Each animal follows a specific diet and some would die if they don't follow it. Lions have to eat meat, birds have to eat seeds, sharks have to eat shrimp, etc. How would've they all been fed without a major problem? Aside from food, they would need water, also. Most animals would need many gallons of water to survive. If there were even only 1,000 animals (well less than what Noah had to do) they would still require about 10,000 gallons of water. How to you fit that all onto one ship? And no, don't say that they could just drink the flood water. Aside from being riddled with diseases that would kill off some of the animals (and every single one survived), if Noah was to gather the water, the animals would try to get out. Plus, since all of the animals were all squeezed together, it would just make it tougher to resist the urge to get out of the ark. Which brings us to our next problem.How did Noah fit the animals aboard, and how did none of them get sick? First, let's look at how he could've possibly gotten the animals aboard. The ark was about 450 feet long, and likely not very sturdy. Modern wooden ships only go up to about 300 feet and aren't sturdy at all. Since an elephant, the largest land animal, is about 13-16 feet (and he needed two of them), it would've taken up roughly 8% of the ark lengthwise, it would've been impossible for Noah to fit all of the animals on board. Even if Noah did magically fit every single animal aboard, how would he stop diseases from spreading to the animals? Since he only had two of every kind, and no room for mistakes, he couldn't let any diseases on board. But how is that possible? Also, isn't bacteria an animal? Doesn't the Bible itself say he had to save any ANIMAL? He would've had to bring very dangerous bacteria aboard (and how would he gather it?) and not let it spread to the animals. And since there are millions and millions of bacteria species, at least one would infect an animal. There is no way that Noah could've preformed such a feat.So you, con, will have to argue against these points and prove each one wrong. Good luck to anyone who accepts.Thanks to these sources for my information:http://animals.about.com...http://www.talkorigins.org...