Adam and Christ are not synonymous

"My opponent should just admit he was wrong about Adam being formed and not created. He also stated his opinion, meaning my opponent claims to be smarter than Dr Strongs who wrote the Strongs Concordance that explains what is lost in translation. Wow!Contention #1Anyone can Google the truth and see who lies.Formed #3335 means squeezed into, the potterCreated #1254 say absolutely created."I absolutely did not claim to be "smarter thant Dr Strongs [sic]" and what I stated was not my opinion but rather further information from Strong's Concordance that my opponent neglected to share. Voters, please verify everything I said yourself by visiting this link: http://lexiconcordance.com..."Contention #2Hey I did not write it. Not my plan! My opponent boasts that Adam (The Alpha of the bible.) was sinful. Or did God in flesh activate the plan of God. God gave Himself for all and Eve!Rev_13:8, And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.Rev_13:9, If any man have an ear, let him hear."This contention makes no sense and the verses listed are irrelevant."Contention #3God left His bloodline record. The beginning of the line of David was is Adam...................Luk_3:38, Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.Rev_5:5, And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.Rev_22:16, I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."My opponent has finally posted some Bible verses relevant to the topic at hand. I shall explain why he has interpreted each improperly.Although Luke 3:38 does indeed refer to Adam as "the son of God," he was not the Son of God in the sense that Christ is. Romans 8:14 refers to all believers as sons of God, but clearly this does not mean that we are each Jesus Christ. As the well-known John 3:16 points out, Christ is the only natural Son of God, fulfilling his timeless role as that facet of the Trinity. Adam was the son of God in the sense that he is created by God in the Genesis metaphor rather than being born of human parents.As for Revelation 5:5 and 22:16, God established David's kingdom in 1 Chronicles 10:13-14 and was also born of the line of David as the Christ in the gospels, making him both the root and the offspring of the line of David."My opponent discredited Adam saying He did nothing but sin and die. That is a bold faced lie. Because it is written that Adam named everything in the beginning. Not so easy to name every plant, animal, bug, fish, fruit tree and the base nations named in Genesis. I bet my higher criticizing opponent does not know the names of everything in creation." Gen 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature that was the name thereof. Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle and to the fowl of the air and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him."I never said any such thing. Even if I had, what would that prove?ConclusionTo sum up this debate, my opponent has presented some very tenuous similarities between the story of Adam in Genesis and the story of Christ in the gospels. This naturally does not mean that Adam and Christ are one and the same. To prove this, let us consider the many similarities between the story of Joseph and Jesus. Both were betrayed by those closest to them (Joseph by his brothers and Jesus by his disciple), both were sold for thirty pieces of silver (Joseph into slavery and Jesus into the hands of the religious leaders), both were accused of and punished for a crime they did not commit (Joseph of adultery and Christ of blasphemy and insurrection) and both were placed into positions of power after their ordeals (Joseph as the right hand man of the king of Egypt and Jesus at the right hand of God.) These are only a handful of the many parallels between the two.[1]Does my opponent also believe that Joseph was an incarnation of Christ? Of course not. So why should similarities between Adam and Christ make them one and the same? As Paul says, Adam was a "pattern" or a "figure" (depending on your translation) of the one to come, meaning Christ.[2] This explains any similarity between the two.Sources1. http://www.christtheonlyway.com...2. Romans 5:12-17