I will not break a rule

I will drop the violations of rules 7 & 18. ============== Violation 1 - Rule #11 ============== "The probable loser of this debate would be violating rule #11 only if the probable loser of the debate told Pro what _not_ to type." I cannot type "I have not violated a rule" or "He was violated multiple" or many other things in discussion of violations because of the possible winner of this debate's Rule #14. Thus, by the possible winner of this debate's own standards, I win because my ability to discuss rules has been limited. ============== Violation 2 - Rule #17 ============== Rule 17: CON must only refer to himself as 'the probable loser of this debate.' Quotes made in the previous round: "The probable loser of this debate will now state his rebuttals to violations." "The probable loser of this debate says that his arguments defending his rule #14 stand." 'His' in both instances refers to the possible winner of the debate, thus he violated rule #17. An alternatve word choice could have been used to show possession, as is demonstrated later on: "The second line in rule #23 contains possible violations to the probable loser of the debate's rules." Thus, because a non-'probable loser' reference was made, I win the debate. Further, a more clear violation was made here: "my opponent stated that I can not limit his ability." 'My' and, even more certainly, 'I' are direct violations of rule #17, resulting in a win for me. ============== Violation 3 - Rule #25 ============== "the possible winner of this debate must thrice compliment me, by telling me that I have a body as hot as a 100 degree temp-or-ize as blue as the sea." No such compliments have been made, again resulting in my win. ============== Violation 4 - Rule #13 ============== Rule #13: None of my opponent's rules may be of exceeding difficulty for PRO. As of current, my rules must be written in correct 3-line rhyme scheme, with alliteration, without making references to 'the possible winner of this debate' without using that exact wording (which very much throws the rhyme scheme off, let me tell you.) I'll let you, the voter, be the judge, but it certainly is taking more and more effort to create these rules. It certainly seems to me to fit the category of 'exceeding difficulty.' =============== My Violation - Rule #23 =============== I've certainly been busted! It was a typo on my part and a nice find at that. 'Probable winner' refers to nobody in particular, so I suppose that I've wasted a chance at posting a perfectly good rule as rule #23 as it stands applies to nobody. =============== My Violation - Rule #24 =============== "The probable loser of this debate states that the rules #24 and #25 mentioned above are in violation of foundation rule #4. Even the fact that the probable loser of this debate personally wants marijuana to be given to all species or animal, including iguanas, that is neither making rules or discussing the violation of the rules." However, Rule #24 states "the possible winner of this debate must wanna give the iguana marijuana" which is a clear command. =============== My Violation - Rule #25 =============== "The same applies to giving the probable loser of this debate's opponent compliments." As I can be quite vain, I made a rule forcing the possible winner of this debate to compliment me. It is definately a rule that must be followed. =============== 2nd Violation - Rule #25 =============== "In the probable loser of this debate's opponent's rule #2[5] he states that the probable loser of this debate must compliment him three times. The probable loser of this debate found that that compliment contains the word that is represented by the first letter of the alphabet of the English language. This violated Pro's previous rule #19 an the probable loser of this debate is therefore unable to comply with this new rule." I stated "thrice compliment me, by telling me that I have a body as hot as a 100 degree temp-or-ize as blue as the sea." 1. Paraphrasing is possible. There is no reason the wording must be exact, just that I must be told that I've got a smokin' build. 2. As the conjunction used is 'or' and not 'and', the 2nd compliment could instead be utilized. I could thrice be made aware of my beautiful eyes. ======= New Rules ======= 29.) I do not like the possible winner of this debate's avatar, thus from now on it must be set as this (http://www.google.com...) iron bar, so (as of 12/7/09) it may be viewed by voters, both from near and from far. 30.) While, on a Monday morning, I was earnestly eating at Piccadilly, I was intensely angered by a dreadfully fearsome and frightful hill-billy, so to vent my anger I demand that the possible winner of this debate slap himself silly. 31.) A picture shall not be posted of an iris, or of that dumb diva, Miley Cyrus, or even of the Ebola Virus.