AMANDA KNOX and RAFFAELE SOLLECITO: GUILTY as SIN!

See: TrueJusticeForMeredithKercher, Rudy Guede posts. NO WAY is the indictment of AMANDA KNOX and RAFFAELE SOLLECITO a matter of corruption, or international/ political bias; GUILTY! SUPREME COURT'S SENTENCING REPORT: Meredith was virtually motionless throughout the attack; defensive wounds almost non-existent, because she was STRONGLY RESTRAINED. (Meredith's arms were held behind her back). Dr Galati"s appeal argued it was ILLEGAL for Hellmann and Zanetti NOT to have taken the Supreme Court's ruling on THREE perpetrators fully into account, having brushed past it. The HONOURABLE Judge Micheli's major reasons to indict Knox and Sollecito: 1. Sollecito's LIE about the time he phoned police: 2 NOV.12.35pm Postal Police arrived unexpectedly at the cottage to find Knox and Sollecito stood outside. Postal Police had learned of some disturbance at the cottage. Sollecito told them HE HAD ALREADY phoned the police, which was A LIE; he phoned the police at 12.51pm and 12.54pm; FIFTEEN MINUTES AFTER the Postal Police arrived. 2. Meredith"s and Amanda"s DNA on knife. 3. Raffaele"s and Amanda's DNA on M"s bra clasp and inch of fabric. Claims of contamination and "poor matches" of DNA samples raised by the defenses; DNA expert Dr. Stefanoni"s arguments in reply, summarized in Judge Micheli"s report. Dr S. admits the RFU readings are low (M's blood on knife blade), but her experience is that many cases of unquestionable matches exist showing readings even lower. Contamination in the lab is excluded by Dr S; samples were processed with maximum care to avoid any contamination during lab procedures. Contamination during collection phase is excluded by Judge Micheli, as samples were collected by different officers at different times in different places. Sollecito"s DNA on M's bra clasp is UNQUESTIONABLE, according to lab reports. Who came back, cut off Meredith"s bra and moved her body some time later? NOT Guede who went home, cleaned himself up and went out on the town with his friends; WHO had access to the cottage...?! 4. STAGED BREAK-IN: Broken glass ON TOP of ransacked items and marks on the inside shutter both demonstrate window was broken from inside. Knox and Sollecito's defense lawyers FAILED MISERABLY to prove Guede climbed in Filomena"s bedroom window. Bloody bare footprints, shown up with luminol and fit Knox"s and Sollecito"s feet suggest they entered Filomena"s room and created the scene AFTER Meredith was killed. 5. PROVEN CLEAN UP after the crime and after staged break-in: Meredith"s blood was in the bathroom and her bedroom, however, NO visible blood INBETWEEN. The only visible blood in the hall UNDER CLOSE EXAMINATION, was faint partial shoe prints by Guede as he left the apartment. Only Guede stated there was blood in the hall in his diary (initially, neither the Postal Police nor roommates and friends noticed any blood in the hall). Guede: "... ...asking myself how is it possible that Amanda could have slept in all that mess, and took a shower with all that blood in the bathroom AND CORRIDOR? (Guede, Germany Diary, P21) 18th DEC: Investigators applied Luminol (detects cleaned away blood), in hall and other rooms, which revealed several footprints in hall between rooms of Knox and Meredith. Also discovered prints in Filomena"s room, which contained Meredith"s DNA and Knox"s DNA, plus a footprint in Knox"s room. WHO had the motivation to hide this evidence? A.Knox/R Sollecito. Neither Judge Micheli, Judge Massei nor the Supreme Court believe Guede acted alone or had any part in the VERY OBVIOUS CLEAN UP. 6. STAGED SEX ASSAULT SCENE by someone who had knowledge of prior sex attack and wanted to leave the blame solely withGuede. 7. Testimony of Antonio Curatolo: Amanda and Raffaele seen 1 Nov. in Piazza Grimana sometime around 11:00 to 11:30pm; they came into the square from the direction of Via Pinturicchio. Curatolo is certain it was the night before the Piazza filled up with policemen asking if anyone had seen Meredith. 8. Testimony of neighbour, Nara Capazzali: 1 Nov. She heard someone run up the steps in the direction of that street at that time. 9. Testimony of Hekuran Kokomani who was definitely in the vicinity of the cottage on both 31st Oct. and 1st Nov: He places Raffaele Sollecito, Amanda Knox and Rudy Guede together outside the cottage on 1st Nov, at the SAME TIME as the other witnesses. His evidence also places all three outside the cottage the previous night. After listening to all arguments, Judge Micheli provided reasons why he rejected the contamination claims and ruled that ALL biological traces identified as reflecting Sollecito"s and Knox"s DNA are ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE. He concluded that the DNA evidence against Sollecito and Knox IS sound and, considered along with the non-biological proof, he RIGHTLY decided there was MORE THAN ENOUGH evidence to order Knox and Sollecito to stand trial. It is also largely believed that Guede, who would otherwise have nothing to lose, has received DEATH THREATS, should he speak out about the involvement of Knox and Sollecito. VERDICT: GUILTY AS SIN!