Communism is the form of government we should have in the United States.

"Isn't the purpose of communism making everyone equal? If that is the case then giving the doctor a higher salary because he did more work, defeats the purpose of communism" -The purpose of communism is not to have everyone making the exact same wage. If that were the case no one would have the motivation to do anything of importance. You are more than likely referring to Stalin-like models of communism. To each his share, given what his/her work is. The purpose of communism in this regard is to ensure that all are given a liveable income. To ensure that the profits are distributed among the people. You stated, "Also what stops the the leaders from going corrupt and destroying the country. There won't be any checks or balances on the government system, correct?" -This is simply not true. Again you have fallen into the Stalin model of communism. There will be checks and balances since the people will still be electing the leaders. There will still be a congress which will keep in mind the laws, as well as serve as a liaison for state run resources. Corruption will be prevented through the transparency which the state will act on all subjects. That is they will be reporting to the people what is going on in government. "Also you state that there would be controlled distribution of wealth to all parties correct? How does the communist government plan on taking the wealth from the rich in our country. I'm going to assume the government are going to use force in order to take it, in which case would cause liberty problem. Also since everyone should be earning the same amount that would include government officials" Government will not eliminate all business. They will control the means of production. So yes, many companies will be purchased by the state similar to imminent domain. There will be no taking of things by force. The owners will be compensated for there lands/businesses. Again when you claim the equal wages you are applying it to generally. Your final argument was in regards to "Will the government be taking the land from people and be evenly distributing to all. If so this also is an invasion of liberty and rights. Essentially a new constitution would need to be written along with all political officials being overthrown." -You are correct in that the constitution would have to be changed and pretty much the entire system must be overthrown. That much is true. However that course would have to be taken given the tremendous amount of corruption and cronyism that currently infects our government. It would have to take place over time so as to ensure the stability of the economy during the transition. NOT all land would be seized. Simply the means of production would be seized. Laws would be enacted to regulate the owners rights with regards to renting, and usage. In essence this form of government we currently have is willing itself into none existence. The wasteful practices are destroying our resources, and of capital. I realize that you don't care to discuss outsourcing, but it does figure in greatly as an example of how capitalism will destroy itself. Granted we may not care what happens to the worker overseas, but I do care that the overseas worker is taking work away from American workers. You argue that this is fine due to the company enhancing its profits. What does this do for America?? These companies were given tax cuts so they could hire more workers (AMERICAN). Instead they took there tax cuts, went overseas to further make more money, and enhanced their profits even further. This type of exploitation of the system by the corporations is what is hurting us. Communism eliminates that outright. No longer will the people be exploited for the profits of a small % of people. You have admitted right from the get-go that on paper this is the best form of government. Why then must we assume that it won't work. I feel the only reason people would not embrace this is due to greed. Given there are more than enough resources for all to live a high standard of living why is it that only a small number reap the benefits of the work that the average Joe does?? Basically communism makes things fair. Forces things to be fair for all. No other system can do that.