Single Sex Schools Are Better for Education.

You are welcome MassRebut "Go to any parent, including your own and ask them, what is it that they want for their child when he or she grows up. Most parents will say that they want to raise successful and good and learned human beings." This statement assumes single-sex schools are the best choice for education. Also, this statement concludes that only single-sex schools will "raise successful and good and learned human beings." The idea of a single-sex school does not prepare one for the real work world. There is no "one job" that only accepts males or one job that only accepts females. Single-sex schools will not help the student learn to deal with the other gender and/or develop healthy relationships with the opposite sex. And this could make them ill prepared for going into the working adult world. Making therefore this statement has not enough information to back this up. "Just like physics, opposite sides attract each other, the same is the case for human beings." This statement was very true, but no longer in our changing society. This statement assumes that all females are attracted males and all males are attracted to females. A still-new concept is the appearance of homosexuals. If the homosexuals were to be placed in an environment with the only those of their gender, it would be the same level of distraction(s) as it would be with those who are heterosexual. This would therefore leave the distraction of attraction inevitable no matter where the students attend school. "Both genders attract each other and do not think clearly and every action of the student is because he wants to impress or show off to someone he likes in the school." Correction: He and/or she. We are not only talking about single-sex male schools but single-sex female schools as well. On this argument, not all action done by the students is done to "show-off". There could be multiple reasons why a student raises their hand or wishes to "take a whack at it". Interviews I have done from teachers at our local high school and middle school teachers that have seen girls become more daring in class. Women in general are learning to coexist with men in this world better than what they have in the past. This also leads to the next point I would like to show you: "Girls define themselves by their interests, they define themselves by what the boys think of them or what other girls think boys think of them." True statement once again but only partially, boys also define themselves by what their interests are. If they like football, they are most likely going to go out for the football team. If they like theatre, they may as well audition for the school musical or perhaps even fall play. Girls are the same, they identify where their interests are located. "Teachers teaching the opposite gender usually are bitter and are often both teachers and students of opposite genders do not understand and learn from each other but there are exceptions." With this statement: it does not make sense. Secondly, you have no proof to back this up. The points I have made simplified: - Single-sex schools do not prepare students for the real world. - Distraction is inevitable not matter what environment the students are in. - Both boys and girls define themselves by their interests. - Not everything that is done in schools is meant to "show-off" This concludes my argument.