SDA Doctrines about the year 1844, the Heavenly Sanctuary and Investigative Judgement are Unbiblical

The SDA church says: The prophecy of the 70 weeks suppliments the vision of the 2,300 years; in fact, it provides the starting point (457 BC)".The 2, 300 days ended in 1844." (Great Apocalyptic Prophecies, p.44) "The phrase "for two thousand three hundred evenings and mornings" (NRSV) defines the entire period that cover the fulfillment of the vision of the ram, the goat, and the little horn"" (p.3) This means that that they believe the vision of the ram, the goat and the little horn begins in 457 BC. Without this start date for the vision, their 1844 date falls apart. Daniel says he say a ram with two horns, and explains the two horns to mean the kings of Media and Persia. (Dan 8:3, 20) "The two horns were high, but one was higher than the other, and the higher came up last." (Dan 8:3) The taller horn that came up later is the Persians. At first the Medes were dominant, but in 550 B.C.E., Cyrus the ruler of Persia gained an easy victory over Median King Astyages. Cyrus combined their peoples, laws and customs to make it a dual empire. Proof: "In 553, Cyrus the Great, King of Persia, rebelled against his grandfather, the Mede King, Astyages son of Cyaxares; he finally won a decisive victory in 550 BC resulting in Astyages" capture by his own dissatisfied nobles, who promptly turned him over to the triumplant Cyrus." (From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, Pierre Briant, 2006, p.31; also see Wikipedia " Achaemenid Empire https://en.wikipedia.org...) So, the vision begins as early as 550 BC, long before the 457 start date the SDA church claims. Counting 2,300 years from 550 BC doesn"t bring us to 1844, so this date is based on false information. In fact, Daniel 8:4 has the ram pushing in three directions, west, north and south, which again takes place before 457 BC. Further, the 70 weeks couldn"t be part of the 2,300 days because Daniel 8 which relates the vision of the 2,300 days doesn"t mention the 70 weeks or any events of Daniel 9, and Daniel 9 where we have the prophecy of the 70 weeks doesn"t mention the 2,300 days, the ram, the goat or the little horn. So there is no connection. SDAs claim that Daniel 8:14 is talking about 2,300 years, but it says "evenings and mornings" the usual term for literal days. Further, nothing is said in Daniel 8 about "years," it"s the assumption of SDAs that since a day equals in year in two specific Bible prophecies, that this forms a rule for interpreting "all" time prophecy with a day-for-a-year rule. However, this is not a rule for interpreting prophecy. Jesus prophecies that he would be dead for three days, and it didn"t mean three years in that prophecy; God prophecies to Noah that in 7 days more it would rain 40 days, and this didn"t mean in 7 years more it will rain 40 years, so it"s not true that a day always equals in year in Bible prophecy. A day equals in year when the specific prophecy says so, but the prophecy in Daniel 8 doesn"t say so. (Mark 9:31; Gen 7:4) SDAs also say: "In 1844 Christ then entered the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary, to perform the closing work of atonement, preparatory to His coming" (The Great Controversy, page 481) This doctrine holds that Jesus ministered in the holy for 1800 years before entering the Most Holy in 1844. Hebrews 9:24 says that Jesus entered the presence of God at his ascension. Leviticus 16:2, 13; Exodus 25:21, 22; 30:6 and Numbers 7:89 show that God's presence has always been in the Most Holy. So for Christ to enter God's presence in the 1st century C.E., he had to be in the Most Holy. Even the SDA church admits that the "Most Holy Place of the sanctuary, which represented God's own dwelling place." (Pillars of Our Faith, 2001, p.19) To get out of this, SDAs would have to claim that the Father, and his throne, were in the holy place for 1800 before 1844. But this leads to the ridiculous assertion, that an entirely empty room was Most Holy, more holy than the room where the throne of God was with the Father and Son sitting thereon for 1800 years. Also, the claim that the anti-typical day of atonement began in 1844 doesn't even fit the type, because the Lord's goat was not sacrificed until the Day of Atonement, showing that Christ's death on the cross was within the antitypical day of atonement. But the SDAs have reverse the type, having the first aspect of the Day of Atonement ritual - the sacrifice of the Lord's goat on the cross - then to have him do yearly service in the holy for 1800 years, before returning to the Day of Atonement in 1844. Question: if Jesus' death is the sacrifice of the Lord's goat, shouldn't this take place during the Day of Atonement and not the yearly aspect? "Attended by heavenly angels, our great High Priest enters the holy of holies, and there appears in the presence of God, to engage in the last acts of His ministration in behalf of man - to perform the work of investigative judgment, and to make an atonement for all who are shown to be entitled to its benefits." (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 480). The atonement was complete at the cross, for believers were already fully justified, redeemed and reconciled to God (which is what atonement means) long before 1844, according to Romans 5:1, 9-11; 3:21-25; 1 John 1:7; Ephesians 1:7 and Hebrews 9:12, 24-26. Even Ellen White in The Desire of Ages p.790 says "God himself heard the assurance that His atonement for the sins of man had been AMPLE." So Jesus' sacrifice wasn't missing anything. It was enough to atone for our sins. SDAs teach that: "At the time appointed for the judgment "the close of the 2300 days, in 1844" began the work of investigation and blotting out of sins." (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 486) So sins were not blotted out before 1844? They also say: "This work of examination of character, of determining who are prepared for the kingdom of God, is that of the investigative judgment" (The Great Controversy (p. 489, 1939 Ed.) (p. 428, p.1950 Ed.) Did Jesus need the 1844 Investigative Judgment for the purpose of "determining who are prepared for the kingdom of God"? The Bible tells us that Jesus already knew who are prepared for his kingdom. (2 Tim 2:19) Jesus said in John 10:14 way back in the first century, "I know my sheep". According to SDAs, he should have said, I will not know my sheep until after 1844. Jesus told the apostles that when he sat on his throne, they would be worthy of judging the twelve tribes. (Matt 19:28) They did not have to wait till 1844 to see if they passed the Investigative Judgment test to see if they could judge the twelve tribes. In 2 Timothy 4:7-8 Paul knows he is safe before 1844. Hebrews 11 gives a long list of witnesses from Abel down through history who found favor with God before 1844; they we sure of their salvation already. SDAs say: "As the books of record are opened in the judgment, the lives of all who have believed on Jesus come in review before God. Beginning with those who first lived upon the earth, our Advocate presents the cases of each successive generation, and closes with the living. Every name is mentioned, every case closely investigated. Names are accepted, names rejected" (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 483). According to them all the names of the people who first lived upon the earth that believed in Jesus will kickoff the 1844 Investigative Judgment to see if they are worthy, then after that God will start judging the living. Abel: Heb 11:4 (NIV) By faith Abel offered God a better sacrifice than Cain did. By faith he was commended as a righteous man, when God spoke well of his offerings. And by faith he still speaks, even though he is dead. God called Abel "a righteous man". Now is God going to send Abel through the 1844 I J to check to make sure he did not made a mistake in calling him a righteous man? Enoch: Heb 11:4-5 (NIV) By faith Enoch was taken from this life, so that he did not experience death; he could not be found, because God had taken him away. For before he was taken, he was commended as one who pleased God. Enoch was "commended as one who pleased God." Was God mistaken? Will God have to drag Enoch through EGW's I J to make sure "his sins were blotted out"? Poor Enoch, if he fails the I J test he will have to leave heaven and burn in Hell at the end of the world. Sins were blotted out before 1844. "I have blotted out your transgressions like a cloud and your sins like mist; return to me, for I have redeemed you." (Isa 44:22, ESV) God isn't a hypocrite. When he says he has forgiven us of sin, he doesn't keep it in a black book somewhere, he wipes it out. When God forgave the sins of repentant persons 2000 years ago, he didn't tell them wait till 1844 for forgiveness. If they are already forgiven, how forces could a written record of their sin serve? The blood of Jesus has already covered them, what more can be done in 1844? I'll also like to challenge my opponent that the sanctuary in heaven is not a carbon copy of the one that was on earth either. Did the veil which separated the Holy from the Most Holy on earth represent another veil in heaven? Or did it represent something else? We know that the lambs sacrificed represented Jesus, who is far difference from a lamb, so why can't some aspects of the Mosaic tabernacle represent something other than a building in heaven? I look forward to Con's defense of his belief in this very weird doctrine.