Who is the best Doctor from Doctor Who? Justify your opinion and try to refute others opinions.

So, basically, what you are holding against the First Doctor is his appeal to children and thus some childish humor, occasionally."Airing weekly between 5pm and 6pm, the show was designed to fit comfortably between more adult focused shows such as Grandstand and teenaged focused shows such as Juke Box Jury ... Doctor Who was originally intended to be a family educational TV programme. Two of the original main characters were science and history teachers. A lot of the early stories were pure historicals with no aliens. These historical stories were phased out at the end of the 60’s as the more alien settings increased in popularity."from: http://www.thedoctorwhosite.co.uk...What do we learn from this? That the First Doctor appealed to all ages. Which is a historical fact. And makes the show a lasting success to this day.For the Eleventh Doctor, I have two possible replies, both of which I would like you see refute.1. There are cheesy episodes in his series, too. After his regeneration, when he tries out food in AmyPond's house, ending up with fish fingers and a bowl of custard, is that not totally childish? See video: In fact it was taken almost identically from "Winnie the Pooh": So, Smith's Doctor has that, too, and is thus no better.2. If you consider this NOT to be cheesy, then you'd basically be saying that the Eleventh Doctor has LESS appeal to children, which means that his performance made the Eleventh Doctor LESS likable, and hence INFERIOR to the First.For the Seventh Doctor, you already admitted that "The seventh doctor ended up been a cold, calculating, manipulative liar."In fact, he STARTED OUT as something else: "Originally a man with the demeanor of an eccentric, light-hearted buffoon"And that one was cheesy to boot. On his first adventure, he regenerated after inexplicably HITTING HIS HEAD on a console between episodes (what a cheesy off-screen origin to begin with), woke up and recognized his enemy, only to be knocked out cold and injected with an amnesia-inducing drug, so that he'd work for his enemy (see: http://tardis.wikia.com... ). This is not great story-writing, it's one of the oldest tv tropes ever ( http://tvtropes.org... ),so old that even James Bond had this happen to him in the book "You only live twice". He then finds a captured Albert Einstein (cheesy!) and defeats the evil machine by making it "backfire and explode because it could not handle his new clownish personality." (see: http://tardis.wikia.com... ), which is indeed very silly and shows that this Doctor was - early in his career - definitely very cheesy.So, at BEST, both your chosen Doctors suffer from the same mistakes, but still lack the originality of the First Doctor, who delivered storylines even then considered very scary for kids, and with considerable depth: the Daleks, the Cybermen, And soulful acting? How much more soul can someone put into a performance than he did in his passing words to his granddaughter Susan? See video: And, lastly, I present a list of great moments from the First Doctor: a video with a list of the top ten moments, with which I quite agree. This, however, is a bit longer, so watch only for educational purposes, it is not a vital part of this argument.Summarizing, neither Eleven nor Seven hold a great, consistent advantage over the First Doctor, both suffering still from the severe drawback of not being original.