Free will exists

My opponent for giving me this chance to debate on this issue (I have raised my own consciousness somewhat from this debate), and all the readers taking interests in this debate, and being potential voters. So. .. this round, I am going to sum up the debate and show where things stand between us. .. My opponent's main contention is that all our thoughts are generated through processes that we cannot consciously control. I agree with this, but I don't necessary think that translates to we have no free will. Our brain generated thoughts, but we are not compelled to act upon them. If we see an attractive person on the street, and we desire to mate with that person, most of us do not act on that wish. My opponent would say that the thought of "self control" is also generated by the brain through means that we cannot consciously control, but ultimately, which thought we act upon on is a conscious decision. I have also tried to show we have free will by comparing us to animals. Because we are so much more intellectual than other animals, our advanced ability to reason gives the possibility of free will. We can make decisions that goes against what our brain was programmed for. Our brain tells us to have sex with anyone visually pleasing, yet we exercise self control for reasons that cannot be explained by evolution. Students for example, do not typically propagate their gene because the burden of taking care of a child would conflict with getting proper education. Another example I gave in the previous round, I stated our desire to use contraception arose from free will, because contraception would be something our innate intuition would be so against. To further clarify this point, I'll respond to what my opponent said in his last round: "Are those behaviours really counter-intuitive to evolution? Using contraception may limit the number of children we have. Therefore we can provide better for the ones we have. We also may not end up having any children until we find ourselves economically ready to provide for them. Or just emotionally mature enough. Is that really contrary to gene propagation? I say it's not. I say it's the opposite. " The reasoning that we should wait until it is financially favorable did not arose from our brain's hardwiring. Our brain did not evolved in an environment where people who would wait until they are financially stable until they propagate are more likely to survive. This "financial factor" only came into existence after human civilization, and by that point, humans are already fully evolved. Even of my opponent believes that humans are still evolving even when we already are living in a civilization, 6000 years of evolution cannot change the human genome enough to show any difference (6000 years is the estimated time humans become civilized). So how did your decision to use a contraception come from? Surely, it cannot be from our brain's hardwiring, but rather our ability to make conscious decisions. I believe that I have showed a good counter argument for my opponent's main contention, and I have given numerous examples throughout this debate. Thus, I strongly urge voters to vote pro! Free will exists!