The Libertarian view of Nonaggression supports the pro-life position.

I've been wanting to do an abortion debate from a libertarian perspective and I look and it's just waiting in the challenge period! I would like to expand upon Pro's definition of what non-aggression is before we begin though. Non-aggression will be defined as: "an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the "initiation" of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. In contrast to pacifism, the non-aggression principle does not preclude violent self-defense. "[1] I do not think that this definition gives either me or my opponent an unfair advantage in this debate. I simply believe it is more specific than the one which my opponent provided and elucidates on exactly what the non-aggression principle is and what it allows. The fact that non-aggression and pacifism are not one and the same will be at the core of my argument. I will argue that a woman has a right to expel an unwanted organism from her body because that organism is itself violating the non-aggression principle by nurturing itself off of the woman's nutrients. Therefore, abortion is in fact not an act of aggression, but an act of retaliation against an organism who both acted in aggression against and invaded the woman's body. Acts of retaliation can be in accordance with the non-aggression principle when not doing so will result in more harm or aggression against one's property. Property necessarily includes one's own body. Obviously not expelling a parasite that invades one's body will result in that parasite continuing to feed off of it's host, and in the case of children, will violently leave after about 9 months, resulting in much unneeded pain felt by the mother. Pain felt by the mother will not be a central point made in my case. It will be the invasion of the mother's property and stealing of her nutrients that I will base my case on. So to follow the resolution, I will argue that a woman has a right to expel an unwanted organism(embryo, fetus) from her body at any time during the pregnancy up until the moment of birth. As to the other part of the debate that my opponent wishes to bring up, I will argue that a woman's right to an abortion is more about property rights than individual rights for the same reason that man A asking man B to leave man A's property is about property rights and not individual rights. To make my argument simpler to understand, as I know it might look rather messy, I will provide it in the form of a syllogism. (A)The non-aggression principle prohibits individuals from agressing against one another. [2]- Premise (B)A fetus is an individual- My opponent concedes this. [3] (C)The non-aggression principle does not prohibit one from acting in violent self defense- Premise (D)A fetus, embryo is aggressing against the mother by invading her body and living off of her nutrients. - Premise (E)According to the non-aggression principle, the mother may react in a retaliatory manner to prohibit the parasite from aggressing against her in the future. - Conclusion (F)Aborting the organism is the only way to prohibit the organism from further invading the mother's property and stealing her nutrients. - Premise (G)The libertarian view of non-aggression supports the pro-choice position. (H)If the libertarian view of non-aggression supports the pro-choice position, it cannot support the pro-life position. -Definitions of pro-choice[4], pro-life[5] The resolution has been negated. Vote Con. [1]. http://en.wikipedia.org... [2]What constitutes aggression is covered in my definition. [3]Here is a quote that my opponent made in R1. //"I will also argue why the abortion debate is not one of property rights but rather individual rights, as the fetus is an individual. "// [4]"the ethical view that a woman should have the legal right to terminate a pregnancy" . http://en.wikipedia.org... [5]"ethical opposition to elective abortion and support for its legal prohibition or restriction" . http://en.wikipedia.org...