Reincarnation is highly likely to be true

"These cannot be coincidences because the child knows very intimate details including their past life's full name, date of death, mode of death, their intimate information, place of death and more"Except they dont. .. . Almost all alleged cases of reincarnation only has three of those things as proof behind the entire claim and can easily be explained as an eerie coincidences more then reincarnation. .. .. "And if it were just coincidences, why hasn't after 3000 cases of such things has there not been ONE case where a child got something wrong or the person they describe was alive after the child was born? Not ONCE has this happened! "Are you retarded or something? Alleged cases of reincarnation get shot down or even exposed all the time: . http://skeptico.blogs.com...Cases of reincarnation get shot down so much that people dont even care that they get disproven since even they know that reincarnation is just some made up religious sh** invented hundreds of years ago by people who were too stubborn to admit their belief in reincarnation is idiotic since all of it can literally be explained by coincidence or staged fraud. .. .. . "1) Con doesn't know what he's talking about and thinks its mere coincidences that children can knows. Lot about another person. I claim it isn't because of what I've written about as it couldn't. possibly be a coincidence. "Jumping to the most logical conclusion doesnt mean I dont know what im talking about Pro. .. . If a bunch of coincidences start to stack up, they are still nothing more then a series of coincidences that themselves coincidentally happened at the same time. .. Seeing all of this and still yelling 'Reincarnation! ' over and over makes you the one who has no idea what hes talking about. "2) Coincidence, vivid imaginations and fraud were disproven or made highly unlikely. "This is basically every attempt at an argument pro tries to make. .. .. He makes a retarded argument, says its true, and then says im the one who doesnt get it. .. .. .Saying that they have been disproven or made highly unlikely over and over doesnt make it true. .. . Its a fact that coincidences happen and its a fact that alleged cases of reincarnation are more easily explained by an eerie set of coincidences then the claim that reincarnation is involved. "3) Science was not in its infancy at the time the cases were when they were studied. All these cases happened in 20th century and above. "In the 1930's, which is when pro's ONLY solid case of reincarnation comes from, Americans overwhelmingly believed in Creationism, Germans believed that Jews, Blacks, and Gypsies were genetically inferior, and India believed that reincarnation was 100% true! Its painfully obvious that well known cases of Reincarnation recorded almost 100 years ago are likely to have be false since the governments that covered them likely helped stage the cases to legitimize their own religious beliefs. .. .. If the indian government investigated a case of reincarnation, do you think they would try to find every possible way to debunk it or to try to make it look bulletproof to try to legitimize their entire religion? Its obviously the second one since we see that even in the modern world where psychotic regimes like North Korea and its government fabricates ludicrous 'facts' to legitimize their own leaders or beliefs. .. .. . "4) Peer-reviewed books, journals and articles as well as Carl Sagan's quote say there is something interesting happenings here and deserve serious study. "Yes, but theres a f*cking difference between saying 'Hey, maybe we should look into this a little' and 'Hey, Reincarnation must be true! ' which you dont seem to be able to understand. .. .. "Make a smart choice, vote pro! "Youre not in a place to ask people to make a smart choice when your entire debate strategy has been 'Nuh-uh! Youre wrong and im right! ' Pro flat out denies basic explanations for alleged cases of Reincarnation and makes wildly retarded claims that coincidence and fraud cant possibly explain the cases since they have all been ruled out in every case ever. .. .. All evidence suggests that these cases are more closely explained by coincidence, vivid imaginations, and fraud then by reincarnation. By extension, Reincarnation is not highly likely to be true, and its not even remotely likely to be true.