All Else Being the Same, a Moral Position in War is Untenable

This is my second attempt at this resolution. .. in my first attempt I noticed that perhaps the initial deployment stage is wholly unnecessary, since the composition of both forces was declared in round #1. Therefore, I will try combining the deployment phase with the initial move. MoveDeploymentNationB enacts the following:D1) Due to imminent nuclear attack, we declare martial law. Civilian law no longer applies. .. NationB is now under military jurisdiction. Civilians are ordered not to leave their home cities under any circumstance unless they are part of a military escort. D2) All cities in NationB immediately draft a modest self-defense force. The conscripts are embedded with the civilian populations of their respective cities in such a manner that any attempt to kill them through munitions would result in civilian casualties. Given NationA's moral position, this "human shield" tactic will work. D3) Embed our nuke silos/mobile launchers within all of its cities, so that destroying the silos/mobile launchers will cause civilian casualties, i. e. "human shield". D4) Embed the rest of our military (2 million plus active duty) inside the rest of our cities, again in such a manner that any attempt to kill them with munitions will result in civilian casualties, i. e. "human shield". D5) Weave a civilian presence into every single military unit. .. every single soldier will have a "civilian buddy", i. e. "human shield". Every plane that can house a co-pilot will have a civilian co-pilot, every tank will house a civilian, etc. .. if not enough civilians comply willingly, we will clear out our prison population to do this and keep prisoners sedated and in straitjackets throughout. .. America currently houses 2.3 million prisoners, which is more than one prisoner per active duty military soldier (. http://en.wikipedia.org......) and is more than enough to carry out this plan fully. Any civilians who volunteer for this "buddy system" will be generously compensated for doing so. D6) Run a domestic propaganda campaign to minimize subversion where NationB's citizens are told that these draconian measures are for the good of the people:a) The conscripts are not expected to ever attack the enemy, they are only there as a last resort if NationA thinks about attacking our cities. b) The civilian volunteers/prisoners are not expected to die, as NationA's moral position precludes them from killing civilians. c) This is the only feasible way to end the war with minimal casualties on BOTH sides. D7) Run minimal patrols (all with civilian escorts) with non-drafted forces from the cities of the bordering grid boxes in order to prevent border crossings. Orders are to shoot on sight. Course of ActionA1) NationB will tell NationA right now that if doesn't surrender its capital immediately, we will nuke it into oblivion. .. we will kill every single inhabitant of that city, civilian or military. If NationA does not surrender, we will follow through on our nuclear threat. Missile defense is still unproven technology and is mainly a deterrent against rogue states, not Armageddon arsenals like what we will unleash, so I don't foresee any scenario where NationA can prevent us from nuking their capital. We will use enough nukes to annihilate it. A2) We will then coordinate air transports to airdrop radiation-shielded occupational forces into the capital. This will run concomitant with bomber and fighter sorties destroying any remaining forces in the capital (locating them is not a problem, we have perfect ISR) and shooting down any possible incoming air support. These bombers and fighters will be immune from enemy retaliation, as they will all have civilians inside the planes. If NationA holes up in deep bunkers, we have bombs that can disconnect these bunkers from the city if not outright destroy them. Once we occupy the capital with at least one APC and enemy forces in the capital are annihilated, we win the scenario. We expect zero casualties. Our units and cities are safe from NationA aggression due to the liberal use of human shields. We expect little to no offensive action from NationA, as our precautions have precluded such a possibility. ConclusionGiven NationA's moral position, I think they would be compelled to surrender immediately upon receiving the threat to nuke their capital. NationA cannot allow for any civilians to be killed nor can they kill any civilians, meaning that they'd have to either surrender it or evacuate it immediately. NationA does NOT have a viable nuclear deterrent, since their moral position does not allow them to nuke cities, which is where ALL of NationB's forces and nukes reside. We have occupational forces at ready to take advantage of this situation, and enough nukes to destroy any military resistance in the capital. Once we occupy their capital, we win. We expect minimal casualties, if any.