I will not contradict myself

Time to start tying things up.Clarifications and ExplanationsMind Swap ScenarioI apologize if the mind-swap scenario was confusing. However, its unrealistic nature doesn't make it impossible to answer. It's a thought experiment. In fact, one could argue that thought experiments such as this one are deliberately unrealistic to focus on the concepts that are being analyzed. By making it unrealistic, it prevents the discussion from being derailed by distractions present in more realistic scenarios.To explain, you, as you are, are being offered a choice in light of details of the scenario. You are informed that, after your decision, your mind ill be swapped with the other's. Then, in accordance with your decision, one person will be released and the other will be tortured. So, would you have your body released, even though it has the other's mind, or would you have your mind released, even though it was in another's body?The concept being analyzed here is the concept of identity. Do you associate your identity with your mind or your body? The scenarios are presented in conjunction, because people's answers are typically contradictory. Most people answer as you did with the very first question: their fear of torture is not reduced. This suggests that they associate their identity with the body. However, most people would choose to release the person that has their mind, leaving their body to be tortured, which suggests that they associate their identity with their mind. Hence the contradiction. Without an answer to the second scenario, we can't analyze this for you.Car Disassembly ScenarioI'm not sure how this scenario invokes confusion. How could it consist of different parts if it was reassembled with the same parts?Proposed ContradictionsI know I asked some new questions last round, but I want to give you a chance to adequately refute any contradictions I come up with, and you only have one round left. Some of this will involve educated guesses.#1 - Mind-Body contradictionIn Round 2/Question 1 you indicated a fear of torture, despite the fact that your mind would no longer be in your mind. This indicates that identity resides in the body/However, in Round 3/Question 8 you stated that your body could be destroyed without affecting your identity.#2 - Theseus ParadoxIf you take apart a car, then put it back together, it's the same car. However, in Round 2/Question 6, you stated that we could replace a part and the car would still be the same, just with a different part. If we extend this, we end up with a contradiction. We can, over time, continuously replace the parts of the car. It's the same car, just with different parts. Eventually, all the parts will have been replaced. Again, same car, different parts. But, if we retain all of the original parts, and then reassemble the original car, that, too, is the same car. Yet two different objects can be the same. Thus a contradiction.#3 Moral ResponsibilityIn Round 4/Question 2, you stated that "If something that humans don't have power over, than it's not their fault." However, in Round 3/Question 6, you said that you would be morally responsible for the death. But in that scenario, you don't have power over whether or not the coworker dies as, if you did nothing, the chandelier would have fallen anyway and killed the coworker. Since you have no power over their death, you shouldn't be responsible, yet you still claim moral responsibility.