Abiogenesis is the more probable explanation for the origin of life

My opponent is like anyone else who has the ability to punch a few buttons on a computer and finding information that he BELIEVES has something to do with the origin of life. There are many theories of the origin of life and the one he's describing is just another educated guess by some very deceived scientists. The reason they're deceived is because they believe in what they observe has something to do with reality. Any theory gets started by an invisible question within the mind of someone who is observing something he doesn't understand. These scientists observing these amino acids keep getting new invisible questions in their minds to try answer without them wondering how they got the questions within their mind in the first place. They don't realize these questions come from invisible vibrations. The answer to everything is within these invisible vibrations but men continue to believe the answers are something they can observe instead. This is why all scientists are deceived when they get closer to the origin of life and our true created existence. They believe that life is what they see instead of knowing that all life was created as invisible waves before any visible objects can be seen. I Googled these following paragraphs from this website; http://www.universetoday.com... "How did life on Earth arise? Scientific efforts to answer that question are called abiogenesis. More formally, abiogenesis is a theory, or set of theories, concerning how life on Earth began (but excluding panspermia). Note that while abiogenesis and evolution are related, they are distinct (evolution says nothing about how life began; abiogenesis says nothing about how life evolves). Intensive study of the Earth"s rocks has turned up lots and lots of evidence that some kinds of prokaryotes lived happily on Earth about 3.5 billion years ago (and there"re also pointers to the existence of life on Earth in the oldest rocks). So, if life arose on Earth, it did so from the chemicals in the water, air, and rocks of the early Earth " and in no more than a few hundred million years. " These scientists think that life came from something that is observed rather than coming from invisible waves. They need observed chemicals in water, air and rocks to form their theories but they still use the word "IF", which is a word that has nothing to do with the Truth. When anyone uses the word "IF", they don't have the confidence to say that their theory is the Truth and nothing but the Truth. In fact, it wouldn't hold up in court because of the many "IF's" involved. They don't have enough proof to say for sure that the origin of life came from what they observed. Another thing they don't understand is where the water, air and rocks came from that they need as evidence to support their theories of abiogenesis. Where did the air come from? Where did the water come from? Where did the rocks come from? If they can't give you the answer to where these elements came from, then how can they prove to us that life was formed from these elements. How can they prove that rocks got up and danced with each other and started languages to talk to each other? We saints who speak for our Creator are taught by our Creator about who we are and how He created us. This knowledge is taught to us by writing thousands of pages of words that He puts in our invisible mind for us to write down on paper and all the words He puts in our mind to speak with. These invisible words He puts in my mind have to be converted from wavelengths of energy into English words that I can understand so this is why God had me write and speak the English words He puts in my mind. If they were in a different language, I wouldn't be taught anything because I wouldn't understand what He wants me to know. It doesn't take amino acids to put invisible words in my mind to write or speak for our Creator. All it takes is invisible waves converted into languages we understand. Mathematics were taught to men by our Creator by first having some people look up into the stars and having them draw imaginary lines from one star to the next to get shapes for the characters used as numbers and written languages. How else do you think man got these characters to use for languages? Do you think they all came from abiogenesis that these scientists believe is the origin of life? To believe in abiogenesis as the answer to the origin of life is the same as Christians believing that a man named Jesus is their god. There's absolutely NO PROOF that abiogenesis or Jesus are the Truth. By the way, the word "probable" has nothing to do with the Truth. Life was either created by our Creator who calls Himself the Truth and had His prophets and saints testify to His invisible creation or it was through the process of abiogenesis where rocks got up and danced with each other. I'll let you decide if we came from dead water, air and rocks or if we exist within the mind of our Creator as His dreams and life is nothing but a dream to each one of His created invisible beings.