Wrist wathes are better in general than wall clocks

"Again with the cell phone, and again with all my . My inexperienced opponent has no advantage to prove over the wall clock. all he can use is so can a cell phone, which again and I repeat over and over is specifically irrelevant. "Inexperienced? I think you're going to make me cry. .. . (sarcasm)The cell phone is only a PART of my argument. The cell phone IS relevant because it can replace the only advantage the wrist watch has over the wall clock, negating that advantage. By the way, my opponent even agreed the cell phone relevant when you attempted to refute it. My opponent said and I quote, "The cell phone which my opponent fails to understand does not remove the only advantage to the watch over the wall clock. " And then my opponent tried to bring up other "advantages" that a wrist watch has and that a cell phone doesn't have. By attempting to refute my cell phone argument you effectively are agreeing on its relevance to the debate. (lists some of my refutations involving the cell phone) "these are the points my lousy opponent made, he is defending his case on the cell phone, WHEN THE DEBATE IS ON WRIST WATHES AND WALL CLOCKS. "YES THE DEBATE IS ON WRIST WATCHES AND WALL CLOCKS I'M PERFECTLY AWARE. The cell phone is still a factor in this debate as I've said before. And I've also stated many many times that EVEN IF THE CELL PHONE ISN'T A FACTOR IN THIS DEBATE, THE WALL CLOCK IS STILL BETTER OVERALL THAN THE WRIST WATCH BECAUSE THE WRIST WATCH HAS SO MANY DISADVANTAGES. My opponent has decided to call me "inexperienced" and "lousy" and tries to say that my argument COMPLETELY relies on the cell phone argument. This is not true at all. The cell phone helps my argument a lot, but even without it, voters should still vote Con because I showed the many downsides the wrist watch has while the wall clock has 0 of those downsides. "this is the lack of research, experience and thought which my opponent lacks to show by repeating all my comments and made points. He has no advantage over a useless wall clock, which simply displays time in a boring matter. "This is starting to get funny. Now I lack research (when did my opponent do research on this debate), experience (wow my opponent has been on the site 3 days more than I have) and thought (while my opponent throws lame insults at me instead of trying to back up his argument for the wrist watch - that's great thought on his part)"1. Con was excessively using the term so can a cell phone. "The cell phone removes the only real advantage the wrist watch has. My argument does not completely rely on the cell phone anyway"2. Con, throat the debate used all my points to debate his case because he did not have the research"I don't know what throat the debate is, and I find it very humorous that my opponent is saying I did not have research when this debate requires absolutely no research. It's on watches and clocks. .. . come on now. Oh but my opponent provided an abundant amount of research. .. . (sarcasm)"3. Con was saying my advantages was not unique while the wall clock has none. "Actually the wall clock is easier to read - that's an advantage. The wrist watch comes with so many disadvantages that even if the wall clock had no advantage it would still be better overall simply because the wrist watch has so many cons. "4. Con did not show any advantage except the tan lines, and the infect with the sun light on the watch. "What does this even mean? I showed those DISadvantages for the wrist watch in this debate along with many others. "5. Con lacked research"Oh yeah because Pro just overwhelmed this debate with research on his part (sarcasm)All right since my opponent addressed only the cell phone part of my argument and nothing else in the last round, that leaves dropped points. I'll just move in to the reasons to vote Con. Reasons for voting Con 1. The wrist watch has so many downsides, whereas the wall clock has none of those downsides. I'll list the downsides to the wrist watch again Cost for style - a wrist watch of good style and quality can be quite expensive. My opponent never addressed the cost factor, just that there are different kinds of wrist watches. Extend Causing tan lines - wearing a wrist watch outdoors consistently causes stupid looking tanlines on your wrist. My opponent never effectively refuted this, just says that tan lines can be "removed" Discomfort - wrist watches can be too loose, too tight, and when it's worn in hot weather, sweat builds up under the band of the watch, causing discomfort. My opponent NEVER addressed this disadvantage. Readability - a wrist watch can be hard to read either because of size or because of glare caused from the sun outdoors. My opponent even said I prove this disadvantage in his reasons for voting Pro ALL of these disadvantages were dropped at the end by my opponent, so really all of them should be extended2. My opponent was not professional at all in this debate. I know I became sarcastic, but only after my opponent called me a "weak level debater". My opponent went on with his lame insults, like "inexperienced" and "lousy". Therefore I urge a conduct vote for Con because my opponent did not remain professional at all.3. The wall clock is in fact better in general than the wrist watch. I have shown the many disadvantages that the wrist watch has. I have also shown that the cell phone eliminates the portability of the wrist watch, which is the only potential good thing the wrist watch has. I have proven not that the wall clock is absolutely fantastic, but that the wrist watch is so bad that it is worse than the wall clock. Therefore the wall clock is better than the wrist watch.