Religion Is Progressive and Necessary

One thing I need to clarify. You clearly said that I have talked about FGM. No, I did not. YOU LIED in a DEBATE. You did not even confess that. Why, sir?Now, the points -1. I have never said that YOU CANNOT FORCE ANYONE TO LEARN THINGS. Yes, you can. Surely. But what I am calling abuse is not the force to learn, the compulsory LABELLING. I am against LABELLING. Would that be justified if my child is labelled as a 'Marxist' child, just because I am a Marxist? IS THAT NOT ABUSE?You completely ignored the 'labelling' thing in the previous round. Why are you ignoring that?'Labelling' is child-abuse.'Teaching' or 'forcing to learn' is not.Simple as that. That is what I said and you ignored.2. I am saying it again. I DID NOT TALK ABOUT FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION. 3. I am not talking about a specific religion. I am talking about RELIGION as a whole. And, CHRISTIANITY is part of the religious arena. Moreover, each religion has a CULT-like authority. An questionable, illogical leap of faith. EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM.For example, Buddha was a materialist. However, today's Buddhism, too, is run by a cult-like system.4. I personally admire the Cultural Revolution. However, if, for the sake of the debate, I acknowledge for a certain time that the Cultural Revolution was destructive, how can that justify the crimes Religion has done?I am saying it once again. If person-A is a criminal, and has not yet been prosecuted, does not justify the crimes done by person-B.You want information for every religion? What about the Crusades? Involves major religions.Hinduism had flagrant customs like the 'widow-burning'. You may say that these religions might have done bad things. But that does not debunk the concept of Religion, as a whole. No, it doesn't. Then why I am blaming Religion as a whole?That is because IT IS A CULT. IT IS STATIC. On the other hand, scientific studies are dynamic. Science is progressive and preferable over Religion. Because, Scientists have never been killed for challening previous-views or doubting them. Yes, they might have been killed in the past because of jealousy and other problems. But not because of CHALLENGING THE PAST-VIEWS.5. Womens do not hate themselves. But most Religion doctrines are hateful towards women.It does not matter what a woman thinks or what a woman hates. The question here is, how the major Religions treat woman?6. I WOULD NEVER HAVE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT EINSTEIN, IF YOU HAD NOT SAID IN THE FIRST PLACE.And, I did not even slip to 'appeal to authority'."Einstein was a desist, he believed that the universe could only exist because of supernatural power, but was so vast that it was impossible for him to believe that Creator God could care about tiny specks of humanity in that vast universe."What is the source of that? However, it does not matter what Einstein believed in. At least, not in this case.7. I called you a liar for a reason. Because, you clearly lied about my argument. I have never said that you're wrong because you are liar. Please STOP misconstruing.And tell me then, where did I say anything about Female Genital Mutilation? If I do not say anything about it, and you claim that I claimed, and even give a rebuttal, that too in a debate, is that not lying? [It is not a part of the debate. But while in a debate, you should try to stay honest.]