Resolved: Debate.org should feature a catagory of debate called 'debate.org'

First, I'd like to say that there is very little offense on the CON side. Although the CON can win on this, if I prove one argument as an advantage, you must vote for me. Here's why: Although there could be no reason for doing this, there is no reason NOT to. So, if I prove one reason why there should be, and there is no reason not to, it should be changed. With that said, let's take a look at my opponent's arguments. 1. <> How'd you know??? I will prove that debate.org does not meet these definitions. All of these definitions are taken from: http://dictionary.reference.com... I did not use the definitions that had 'technology' in their definitions, such as 1 and 3 on the first dictionary. "2.the terminology of an art, science, etc.; technical nomenclature." Debate.org is not art, nor a science. "4. the sum of the ways in which social groups provide themselves with the material objects of their civilization." Debate.org is not a material object. "1. a.The application of science, especially to industrial or commercial objectives. b.The scientific method and material used to achieve a commercial or industrial objective." Again, debate.org is no science. "2. Electronic or digital products and systems considered as a group." Debate.org is not an electronic or digital tool. "science of the mechanical and industrial arts" Debate.org is not a mechanical nor industrial art. "1. the practical application of science to commerce or industry 2. the discipline dealing with the art or science of applying scientific knowledge to practical problems;" One last time, debate.org is not a science, nor is debating an industry or business. I could go on, but here's what I'm getting at: technology must use science or mechanics, and it must be a material object. Debate.org is a website, not a material object, and does not use science. A computer may meet this definition, a website doesn't. Although Beem0r's definiton was right at one time, it is not now. In other words, the english language is what we make of it. If people say technology means now digital tools, then it is. All in all, there is really no clear place to put these debates, and a debate.org catagory would clear up the confusion. 2. First, a comment box is even less helpful than a debate. The webmaster does not have time to read EVERY SINGLE comment on EVERY debate. Plus, most comments are not about debate.org. Finally, it is not a 'direct' suggestion, the webmaster must go through a lot of steps just to get to the comments. A direct suggestion would be talking to him/her or sending an email to him/her. Second, the search button is flawed on this site. Go search debate.org, I dare you. I found this debate, one of my others about this site, 2 about the tournement, and the rest had nothing to do with the site at all. In order for this argument to apply, the search function should be revamped. Third, the webmasters can always take suggestions. They are, as I assume, doing a fine job, but their goal is to make it best for us users. So, in order to reach that goal, they will take suggestions, but there is no way to see these debates becuase they get wiped off the home screen in a day. 3. I am going to drop this argument, I feel that my above two points are strong enough for you to vote PRO. I await my opponent's response.