BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Offline Shopping Is Safer

There is more risk of your information being stolen online than offline. When you shop online, you usually always have to provide your personal information as well as your payment details when you check out. According to Identity Hawk, that information usually goes into an online database which thieves can more easily gain access to if they hack into it. In addition to the database, some scam artists or retailers use other tactics to steal information and money online such as fake emails, unauthorized purchases and compromise unsecured computers. As long as you are vigilant and monitor your payments when you are shopping online, you should be safer.
Convenience

This convenience comes at the expense of purchasing goods which do not match up to the shoppers expectations which are more likely to be immediately realised in a store offline. That is not to say that the individual has not chosen to buy online after having seen the item in real life, but for those who purchase without having done so, there is always this danger which would go on to cause inconvenience. However, it's also a matter of caveat emptor, isn't it?
Mobile phones are safe for children to use – we should ignore scare stories in the media. The lates...

Mobile phones are safe for children to use – we should ignore scare stories in the media. The latest research says that mobile phones do not damage brain cells. Even those earlier studies that suggested there might be a problem thought that people would have to use a cell phone for hours a day for there to be an effect. It is true that there is no 100% proof mobile phones are safe to use, but that is true of any scientific study.
Mobile phones keep children safer, as it is easier for parents to stay in touch with their children....

Mobile phones keep children safer, as it is easier for parents to stay in touch with their children. Through calls and texts, parents can know where their child is and be reassured that he or she is safe. And in an emergency, young people can summon help quickly.\ Yes, some children carrying phones have been robbed, but thieves are always after something new. Phones now are both much more widespread and security coded, so there is little point in stealing them. If security is your concern, ban the latest personal MP3 and DVD players instead. Traffic accidents should be blamed on bad safety education rather than phones.\
Children will always pressure their parents to have the latest thing; phones are only one example of...

Children will always pressure their parents to have the latest thing; phones are only one example of this. Parents can always say “no” or set limits on what they can spend. With modern payment plans children can be given a set amount of credit for calls and texts. Learning to work within financial limits is an important part of growing up. In any case, many young people have part-time jobs so they are spending their own money, not their parents.
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is now a normal part of modern life, used by everyone...

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is now a normal part of modern life, used by everyone from toddlers to pensioners. So children need to grow up making use of technology such as mobile phones if they are to take their place in society. Such use fits them for the modern workplace with its need for tech-savvy employees with communication skills and the ability to work flexibly. In any case, children often have better phone manners than adults – they are less likely to shout into the phone, more likely to text discreetly, and more aware of text and phone etiquette.
Mobile phones are now a valuable part of student life. Because parents feel their children are safe...

Mobile phones are now a valuable part of student life. Because parents feel their children are safer carrying a phone, they are more likely to allow them to travel to school on their own rather then driving them. This promotes greater independence for the children, while taking traffic off the roads which is environmentally-friendly. Like many other things (girls! boys! the view out of the window!) mobiles can be distracting in class but this doesn’t mean they should be banned. Many schools allow phones to be carried providing they are turned off in lesson.
Anything can be abused, including pencils and paper. New technology always carries some risks but w...

Anything can be abused, including pencils and paper. New technology always carries some risks but we should not be rushed into panic measures. Children got hold of pornography, gambled and bullied each other long before mobile phones were invented. These problems won’t go away if we ban phone use – they can only be dealt with through good parenting and moral education. In the meantime, parents can get phones which block inappropriate content, and ensure their children do not have credit cards to pay for it.
Mobile phones are safe for children to use – we should ignore scare stories in the media. The lates...

There are possible long-term health risks from using mobile phones. Some research suggests that the radio waves from mobile phones may harm people’s brains. Because children’s brains are still developing, any possible damage to them is even more worrying than for adults. It is true there is no total scientific proof about this, but it is better to play safe than take risks – the precautionary principle. Until science can prove mobile phones are completely safe for young people to use, they should not be allowed to have them.
Mobile phones keep children safer, as it is easier for parents to stay in touch with their children....

Mobile phones make children less safe. Firstly they are carrying an expensive fashion item that makes them a target for criminals. Millions of people are robbed of cell phones every year, sometimes with violence. Secondly, many children spend so much time talking on the phone or texting that they are less aware of what is going on around them. Each year young people get run over crossing the street because their attention was on their phone conversation, not the traffic.
Children will always pressure their parents to have the latest thing; phones are only one example of...

Mobile phones are too expensive for children. Even if basic models are cheap to buy, calls are expensive and charges soon mount up. Many young people run up big bills their parents have to pay. A few rich families might be able to afford this, but for many parents the hours their kids spend on their cell phones are an uncontrolled expense they cannot cope with. Others are under peer pressure to get the newest, most stylish phone with all the latest gadgets. Banning children from carrying cell phones would take away these problems from ordinary financially-stretched families.
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is now a normal part of modern life, used by everyone...

Mobile phones are a distraction from the real world, preventing children from interacting with those around them. Constant talking, texting, and games playing take the place of proper socialising. Young people grow up without good manners, unable to relate to those around them in a normal way. They also become fat and lazy, as phone use crowds out healthy activity such as sport or playground games.
Mobile phones are now a valuable part of student life. Because parents feel their children are safe...

Mobile phones are inappropriate in schools. They take students’ attention away from their lessons and undermine discipline. Rules about having them turned off in lessons are impossible to enforce – students just put them in silent mode and secretly text or play games in the back of the class. There have been many cases of students using mobiles to cheat in tests, and some of students recording embarrassing footage of their teachers to post on the internet. Schools are for learning and anything which gets in the way of that should be banned.
Anything can be abused, including pencils and paper. New technology always carries some risks but w...

Mobile phones are open to abuse, offering activities which are very inappropriate for children. The ability of modern phones to display graphics has led to the rise of mobile pornography, gambling and even cyber-bullying. Most parents restrict their children’s television viewing and computer use, but it is much harder for them to monitor mobile phone use. Given this, it is best that children are not allowed to own them.
Population tends to self-regulate based upon access to birth control and education for women.

There are many countries in the world which are trapped in a cycle of deprivation. Lack of affordable education and poor infrastructure leads to lack of economic success, which in turn leads to inability to afford the necessary education and infrastrucuture. In these circumstances, having lots of children becomes a kind of social security. An additional factor is that there are quite a few societies where good education for women is actively discouraged, as a social policy. Even in countries which have advanced econonically, a drop of birth rate does not really lead to reduced demand on resources, since each person consumes much more in terms of consumer goods, food, water, energy etc. In the UK for example we probably consume about 3 times a fair share of the world resources available. Countries like China, India and Brazil are hoping to join us shortly. Getting population under control is always going to be difficult, because of the ageing population problem as birth rates drop, but it has to be tackled sometime, and it is not going to get any easier.
The resources of the earth are limited

Population growth can potentially drive scientific advancement to help sustain the population level. it is conceivable that, with enough motivation, we could learn to make habitations on other planets. As long as we're on this planet alone, our species is living on borrowed time. Without a doubt, there will be some sort of natural disaster that will cause an extinction event. If all of us on this planet, that's the end of the species. If we've been pushed into moving off-world, our species and possibly others will survive.
Growth

The world's population has been growing rapidly. In 1800 the human population was below 1 billion. By 1930 it had risen by 2 billion on the back of the industrial revolution and 'agricultural revolution' in Europe and North America beginning to increase production of food so allowing the human population to grow rapidly. Since then with the green revolution population has soared to 6.8 billion and is projected to increase further to 9 billion by 2050.[[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10578484]] While the growth rate has fallen from 2.5% to 1.2% with a population of 6.8 billion this is still rapid growth in absolute numbers.[[http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=sp_pop_grow&idim=country:GBR&dl=en&hl=en&q=population+growth+statistics#met=sp_pop_grow&tdim=true]] With the human population growing there is less room for other animals. We have become too successful and because of that success our population expands.
Acceleration Of Climate Change

According to The Center For Biological Diversity, the world's climate is changing as a result of the burning of fossil fuels. The burning of fossil fuels creates carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide traps heat in the atmosphere, and this causes the world's temperature to rise. This is likely to reduce the amount of arable land on Earth, and it will cause food prices to increase. Furthermore, climate change is likely to result in rising sea levels. There even are major cities that could be flooded. As the population increases, the production of fossil fuels will increase. This is likely to result in climate change occurring at an increasingly rapid pace.
Economic Problems And Crime

According to Chron, it's likely that overpopulation will lead to a scarcity of jobs. The jobs that are available are likely to offer lower wages than in the past. As more people are unemployed or underemployed, the crime rate is likely to rise. This is because more people could be forced to commit "crimes of survival", such as stealing food. According to Conserve Energy Future, the cost of housing is likely to rise due to limited space. This could result in an increase in homelessness. In some regions, little is being done in some areas to prevent this.
Extinction Of Species

As the environment becomes increasingly damaged by overpopulation, it is likely that many more species will be wiped off the Earth. This will result in massive disruption of ecosystems. Due to the disruption, there may be an overpopulation of some species. According to Sea Coast Online, a lack of predators in Maine has resulted in an overpopulation of deer. According to Everything Connects, there currently are more than 19,000 species that are in danger of becoming extinct.
Population tends to self-regulate based upon access to birth control and education for women.

It's been proven over and over again that the initial population boom experienced by former Third World countries doesn't continue for more than one or two generations. As women are given access to birth control and education, the desired number of children dramatically decreases. People, most notably women, hold off on having children until they complete their college education and begin a career. That takes at least a decade off of their childbearing years. At the age of around 27, a woman's fertility begins to decrease. If she's only just started trying to have children at that age, her total number of children will be drastically reduced. Italy, Japan, and others literally can't pay people to have children. Why? They would rather have a job and more income than raise multiple children.
The resources of the earth are limited

The earth is finite, and we have no other place to go. As we marvel at our technology we sometimes forget that the fundamentals on which we depend are the the fertility of the soil, the availability and distribution of fresh water, access to sustainable energy supplies and resources, and a stable climate. Above all we depend on the stability of the earth's natural systems. The breathable atmosphere is less than 5 miles deep. Some reports suggest that we have already lost 80% of the fish in the sea. The problem is that our rapidly increasing population is just putting more strain on the earth's resources than it can cope with. If everybody worldwide aspires to live even at the current living standard of the developed world, then we are already at a population beyond sustainability. As an example just focus on the earth's fertile soils. They exist only on a very small part of the earth's surface. If sea levels rise, many of them are in the locations most likely to be flooded. If we misuse them with over-intensive agriculture they will become degraded. If we build on them, then they are unavailable for food production. If we over irrigate we will run out of fresh water. Within human time scales there are not going to be any more. In the end the natural order will re-assert itself. The earth will reduce the human population to a sustainable number. The only real question is will it be through conflict, starvation and disease, or will we manage to produce a more humane and rational plan.?
Drilling in the ANWR is an economic necessity. The high cost of oil over the past few years has mea...

Drilling in the ANWR is an economic necessity. The high cost of oil over the past few years has meant misery for millions of Americans who cannot afford high gas prices for their automobiles, or heating oil for their homes. These costs are also hitting the wider economy and threatening American prosperity. Only by bringing more oil to the market can prices be driven down. Opening up the ANWR is also necessary to the Alaskan economy, bringing investment and safeguarding jobs as well as the way of life on America’s last frontier.
The USA needs urgently to reduce its dependence on foreign oil producers. At present the United St...

Drilling in the ANWR will do nothing to make America more energy independent. Even on the most optimistic estimates, the fields under the Refuge amount to only ten billion barrels of oil - equivalent to only two years US consumption. Even if as much as a million barrels of oil could be pumped fro the ANWR per day, this will not even offset the likely growth in US oil imports over the next ten years. Achieving true energy independence means getting serious about conserving energy and investing in alternative energy sources, not feeding the US addiction to fossil fuels.
Drilling in the ANWR is an economic necessity. The high cost of oil over the past few years has mea...

Drilling in the ANWR won’t reduce the oil price because the amount of oil there is tiny compared to America’s need. The price is set by global conditions such as the rise in Chinese demand and the disruption to supply caused by the crisis in Iraq. In any case, we must be prepared to pay the costs of environmental protection, the principles of which are breached by this proposal. If ANWR is developed for oil extraction, not only is its status as a National Wildlife Refuge under attack, but all other NWRs are also threatened. Big oil and other extraction companies will look greedily at other protected areas and begin to lobby for their status too to be downgraded. If NWR status is to mean anything, it must be upheld everywhere and absolutely.
The USA needs urgently to reduce its dependence on foreign oil producers. At present the United St...

The USA needs urgently to reduce its dependence on foreign oil producers. At present the United States needs 10 million barrels of imported oil a day, and much of this comes from unstable or unfriendly areas of the world, for example the Persian Gulf, Nigeria, Venezuela and Iran. National security depends upon ensuring that the American economy is never held hostage to foreign oil interests, and the government should act to achieve energy independence. An important part of this is the exploitation of untapped US reserves, including the huge ANWR oil fields in Alaska.
Sir Alf Ramsey

Sir Alf Ramsey was manager of Ipswich Town between1955-1963, and in that time took them from the third divsion south to English champions, which in itself is an extraordinary achievement. However his crowning achievement is to do what no other English manager has achieved, when he was the manager of the English world cup winning team of 1966. He also guided England to third place in the 1968 European Championships and quarter final finishes in the 1970 World Cup and 1972 Euros.
Sir Bobby Robson

Although winning the Dutch and Portugese championships is a decent achievement, it is not as much of an achievement as winning the championship of one of Europes major leagues (England, Spain and Italy). This is a glaring omission from his trophy collection as he failed to win the championship during his 15+ years of management in England, and his failure to win the Spanish title with an expensively assembled squad, (Ronaldo cost £19miliion alone) was the reason he lost his job with the Catalan giants. Unlike many of the other managers on this list, he failed to win the European cup or the world cup, therefore cannot claim true greatness.
Sir Bobby Robson

Sir Bobby Robson deserves to be seen as the most successful English manager of all time for the following reasons; During his 13 years in charge of Ipswich he firmly established the side as a top six team, finishing runner up on two occasions, he also won the FA cup in 1978 and the Uefa cup in 1981. He is also one of the few English managers to achieve real success on foreign soil. He won the Dutch championship with PSV Eindhoven in 1991 & 1992 and during his period in charge of the Dutch team he was responsible for bringing to Europe a young Brazilian forward by the name of Luis Nazario De Lima, better known as Ronaldo. From PSV he went to Porto where he won the Portugese championship in 1995 & 1996 as well was Cup of Portugal in 1994. In 1996 Robson was appointed manager of Barcelona, where he won the Copa del Ray, the Spanish Super Cup and the Cup Winners cup and was subsequently voted European manager of the year for the 1996-1997 season. However his failure to win the Spanish championship resulted in him being 'moved upstairs' the following season. His last managerial role was as manager of his boyhood team Newcastle United. He was Newcastle manager between 1999-2004 and oversaw a rare period of stability for the club, guiding them to champions league qualification in two of his seasons. Robsons most famous managerial exploits however, are involved with his role as manager of England which he began on 7th July 1982. After failure to qualify for the 1982 European championships, Robson guided the team to the next three major tournaments after that, losing only one of his 28 qualifying games as England manager. His greatest achievement was to some in the 1990 world cup when his England team were only knocked out on penalties by West Germany in the semi finals.
Brian Clough

There are a variety of reasons why Clough is not the best manager. The number one reason would be that without his assistant Peter Taylor, he lasted only 44 days at Leeds and finished only a modest 8th in the second division with Forest in his first full season while he was without Taylor. A great manager should be able to function on his own, and not depend on somebody else for their success. In his long career he never established a 'great' team. The best managers build teams that dominate their domestic leagues, but Clough only won two championships in his whole career, and never won the FA cup. The two European cups in a row is obviously a commendable achievement, but without establishing a great team that dominated English football for a number of years, he cannot be seen as the best.
Brian Clough

Brian Clough is not only the best manager England never had, he is the best manager the country has produced. His achievements are legendary. He took Derby County from the bottom of the old division two, to become champions of England within four seasons. However his landmark achievements where to come with Nottingham Forest. He took over in season 1974-1975 with the team in the second division, but by the 1977-78 season Forest were champions of England, making Clough the first manager since Herbert Chapman to win the league with two different clubs. Arguably his greatest achievement would be winning the European Cup twice in a row in 1979 & 1980. This achievement of taking two teams from the lower leagues to win the league and guiding a provincial team to European glory not once but twice is why Clough deserves to be seen as the best English manager of all time.
Bob Paisley

Bob Paisley was Liverpool manager between 1974 & 1983. He has the unenviable task of taking over from the great Bill Shankly, but it is a measure of his talent that his 9 years in charge where more trophy laden than that of his illustrious predecessor. In his nine years in charge, Paisleys Liverpool won silverware in eight of those including 6 league championships and three European cups. He remains the only English manager to win three European cups. In addition to these he also won three league cups, one Uefa cup and one European super cup, giving him a quite sensational total of 14 major trophies in 9 years.
Sometimes young people need to live with their parents or vice versa.

It would be very wrong to force people out of their parent's homes , yes parents should encourage adults to be independent and move out when they're ready but sometimes parents have debilitating diseases that require care/support and do not want to move into an old-home. Sometimes young people have the same problem and need their parents to support and care for them. Psychological illnesses are on the rise correlating with individualism. Older people are happier in the presence/company of younger people. Grandparents(especially grand mothers) proximal to their children and/or grandchildren live happier/longer lives. Family/emotional/filial support is good for a person's health.