Creationism is a Rational Belief System

Description of Straw Man "The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position." http://www.nizkor.org... This can be claimed by anyone about anything, and was not my intention, so I now call this debate Strawman vs. Strawman, by definition. I can make the same "strawman" comparison by simply typing the words,"That is not what I meant", or "You are misinterpreting my meaning". I can then say, you are a strawman for calling me a strawman because you are calling me a strawman by misinterpreting me thus, making you a strawman. By definition, we are all guilty of "strawman falacy". I assume my opponent meant no disrespect, and knows I do not possess the ability to 100% invision his motives or meanings without any error. If I do, it's a crying shame that I am ignorant on how to use my abilities. So this debate is Unintentional Strawman vs. Unintentional Strawman. We could define Semantics now, but I see no need to dig the debate into an Unintentional Strawman 5000 With a Cherry on Top Deluxe vs. Unknowingly Strawman Excel 10 to the 3rd power divided by pie or in other words, Semantics vs. Semantics discussion. I'll choose to continue on. I digress. My Atheist friends always use the term "observable". "Without observation," they say, "we are unconvinced." They say we need to "observe in order to believe". I am an Evolution and "fossil record", Agnostic. I haven't observed anything or seen dependable evidence. Ironically, neither have Biologists. "Just have faith. Trust us, our theories and our guesses, because they make sense to us." To this I respond about Creationism,"Just have faith. Trust me, my theories, and my guesses, because they make sense to me." Any Evolutionary Theory, including the when standing alone, discusses no explanation or knowledge of who, what, when, where, or how as to the same list of questions referring to how any first cell or first organsim came into existance in the first place. The Theory of Abiogenesis had to be birthed as an answer to my rebutal. Ironically, Abiogenesis' very name gives you a clue in its root; Genesis. Now we are headed in a logical direction. We need an equation here, so I'll provide one. x = life So the unknown exponent here needs to have a logical answer. Let's plug an answer in for "x". X = nonlife. So nonlife evolved into life. Nonlife = life. Nonlife slirped its way magically into a cell(s), then into more and more complexity until we had life in some recognizable lifeform, then consciousness, we skip ahead to humans, thus we have computers, nukes, GPS, skyscrapers, space shuttles, moon colonies, Mars colonies, transportation faster than the speed of light, invisibility tech, ability to replicate, future stem cell tech V, ability to repair the body instantly, brain repair or transplants, body mechanics, telekenesis, future virtual reality tech, inability to tell the virtual from nonvirtual, saving consciousness, dna codes, and who we are on a futuristic high tech hard drive, evolving into post human super species, a mix of technology and Evolution evolving into high tech cyborgs able to live as immortals as long as the information was available to download into a host, then even more truely immortal, and if higher dimensions are able to be channeled, we become outer or inner dimensional beings, and so forth and so on until one of us or several of us as a "governing entity" become a god or gods, and if time travel is possible or even concepts human beings can not concieve yet, we reach omnipotence in a reality where time is irrelavent, and we or one of us becomes omnipotent but not in the manner of time as we know it because time travel and barriers of science are broken accordingly. It's an interesting concept. We'll just label it as Evolution Theory. In the Theory of Everything, the Bible is true, Lord of the Rings is true somewhere, and so is Superman as an advanced alien with powers we do not possess. And this is a secularly created concept. And then perhaps, someone else has reached omnipotence already ERVs The ERVs of humans, chimps, monkeys, gorillas, or any other monkeylike creature do not line up because they have the same ancestry. They line up because different ERVs prefer to attach to their favorite locations or "hot spots". Mutations "hurt" reproduction cells(egg and sperm), so there is no good reason for evolutionists to guess or theorize that ERVs will create new beneficial functions. Speaking of ERVs. Let's move on to an even simpler form of matter that even ERVs are made up of as is everything. Atoms. Here is a video on Quantum Entanglement. http://youtu.be... So, now we need a Creationism equation to be fair, right? I'll give us one. x = life x = life Here is what we are looking at. Life = Life Here are our 2 choices. Nonlife = Life Life = Life In simple logic, it is easy to percieve life coming from life, but it seems hard to percieve life coming from nonlife. Spontaneous Generation has been proven false, but it was once thought to be a rational and honest piece of science. Even if it had been correct, it still would not have answered life coming from nonlife, nor is there any truth in it or logic. The concept was tested, and it is 100% false. I could step aside and act like this is the end of the logic involved here, but it is not. The next question any Atheist or Agnostic would ask is a very reasonable question, and it must be answered. Creationism owes and is demanded by common sense, reason, and logic to answer this fundamental question. Where did life come from to give life. Simply put, where did God come from? When was He born in time? It is a tricky thought but does have an exponential value. X must equal x. How do we get there? It seems irrational to say life came from nonlife. It does seem rational to say life came from life. Nevertheless, where did first life come from? In the 3rd dimension there are 3 points that give us an exact location. As we move, these 3 points move as if the cross hairs of a rifle scope are on us at all times. These 3 points can always tell us where we are exactly in 3 dimensional space. In the 4th dimension there are 4 points that serve the same purpose. What is the difference? In the 4th dimension we have the same 3 points as the 3rd dimension. The difference is the 4th point, and the 4th point is time. In this dimension we can move forward and backward in time. So, to simplify, in the 4th dimension, we are located by three points, and the 4th point locates our point in time going forwards and backwards. An example is,"He is standing at an exact coordinance on a mountain at 3:45 (and 10.678936523 seconds) pm. In the fifth dimension we can move more directions in time such as up and down. Here is a video to elaborate this very thought. - 10 Dimensions - Time is a dimension.