The Theory of Evolution Cannot Explain All Organisms.

Thank You Con,I will now present my rebuttals:Irreducibly Complex Systems:Evolutionists, in an attempt to dodge the compelling objections of irreducible complexity, have presented the idea that while the evolution of irreducibly complex systems was still in progress, the biological parts required in the process performed functions in and of themselves before later committing themselves to the idea of a single, corporate function. This notion is very unlikely for several reasons:The functions that evolutionists claimed these parts performed in the past are very speculative. We constantly find more and more irreducible systems, and as we do, the proposed functions of these parts becomes increasingly vague and requires more explanation. With every new discovery the theory of Evolution is subject to further objections.These parts are not so variable as my opponent seems to think. Each protein is like a key that fits into a lock, irreplaceable. Now in order for an irreducibly complex system do evolve, such as the flagella, these dozens of proteins must be the perfectly fit together for some unseen purpose in the future. But there can be no mind, there can be no plan. So this has to be a complete coincidence. The parts cannot have been previously designed to fit together, the fact that dozens of proteins that are, say protein transport systems, are all present in the same cell, and each one fits into another one in an endless chain of perfect fits until they all form together into a perfect propeller type engine! Remember, there is no design, there is no blueprint, and there can be no greater purpose. This is all chance. Imagine finding enough pieces of metal in a post office to make a car engine. It's not a car factory, its not supposed to have the parts to make cars, there just sitting around the shop performing other uses. You can use one of the cylinders as coffee cups. The only way that the pieces required to make the car engine could be there is if someone, aka a MIND, put them there, in knowledge of their inherent future combined use.That is the horribly impossible chance of location.Now lets look at assembly. Let's just say that all the parts are present, and, miraculously, they all are capable of forming together, and, miraculously, these extra parts, which are obviously not needed by the cell, (because it does quite alright without them), have not yet been eliminated by natural selection because of their uselessness. So lets just bypass those problems so we can examine assembly for the moment. These parts are as I said, like keys and locks. Lets say that there are 40 of these parts (flagellum.) In order for the irreducibly complex system to form, they would all just have to randomly coalesce. Do me a favor, take a key and lock. Throw them into the air together. Toss them up ten feet. Tell me how many times it takes for the key to luckily float in midair into the lock. You are not allowed to put the key into the lock, because there can be no mind in evolution. And its not just two parts, its 40 parts. And they all have to be assembled, together, in the right way. Perfect. Not even a hair out of place. Do me another favor, take a 40 piece Lego set and toss all the parts 10 feet into the air. You can do it as many times as you like. Record your toss number, and when the Lego's finally come down in a fully completely Lego model, tell me how many times it took. Every piece has to be right.Remember, you aren't allowed to build the Lego set. That would take a mind. You are only allowed to utilize chance. The Lego set has to build itself.This will never happen.Finally, lets say that all the pieces were there, and all the pieces miraculously formed together. Now what? Its still just a bunch of extra protein transports, extra ATP storage vacuoles, and whatever else. It may be in the form of the tail, but that doesn't mean it is a tail! Now all the pieces have to change function! And not only that, they have to change just to do part of a bigger function. One has to grip, one has to spin, one has to twist, one has to pull! So that they all work together to form a flagellum. Remember, there is no mind. This is all chance. The parts can't know that what they are doing is for a greater purpose. There are lots of "machines" out there, consisting of moving parts forming together. None of them formed themselves, they were all created by a mind. What caused them to change? What cause them to switch from their old function, to a new, foreign, un-explained function? An evolutionist would say random chance. I say the whole system was a design.Irreducibly complex systems could not have evolved.Miscellaneous:My opponent makes reference to my brain argument. Yes, I realize it did not "materialize out of thin air." But every addition to it from the single-celled organism it originated from had to be the result of a random mutation. No, natural selection is not random, but what my opponent leaves out is that the what is selected by selection is random.My Opponent also makes reference to the numbers I presented from Carl Sagan and Dr. Harold Morowitz. The numbers and explanations of their meaning came directly from one of my sources. If they are misleading than I apologize. I will look into it and make future reference.Conclusion:Irreducibly complex systems could not have evolved. There are too many lego sets, and to many car engines on our planet. Take the ATP synthase molecule, which is an energy convertor. It has no evolutionary explanation. If "chance" was replaced by: "mind", it would make a lot more sense. A mind put the parts there, a mind assembled them, and the mind caused them to change function. And if it did all that, than why wouldn't the mind simply design the system right off the bat? I will discuss abiogenisis in a future round, as I am short on time here.