Are we heading towards World War III

I will go through a point by point refutation of all the major topics in this debate, showing why I have won. 1. Why Obama MUST shut out war cries and talk to Iran. PRO says: "CON gave an example- "You must eat food to survive"In the link I provided, it does not say that Obama must talk to Iran, if he wants to do something, in the above example it does" Clearly this refutation makes no sense. He says that "it does not say that Obama must talk to Iran" when clearly it does. Therefore I have won on this point, proving that Obama does not want to go to war, and instead talk to Iran. This proves that a major crux in my arguments still stands.2. China/RussiaDropped by PRO, therefore I win on this point.3. RelationsPRO says: "In the link CON gave me, it does not say that once elections are over, the relations WILL improve. It says that they are likely to. "No, it clearly shows russian prime minister and the US foreign affairs minister shaking hands. . http://rt.com...Clearly this shows that relations have improved. Therefore, I win on this point.4. Sanctioned TradePRO says: "There is no war yet because the agreements between Iran and U. S. A, E. U, and the U. K are not yet expired. Once they do the, strait of Hormuz will be closed and war will follow. "Pro makes an absurd claim, saying that once trade is expired, war will follow. He has no proof to back up this claim. Why would war follow? I have proven that war will not follow because in the 21st century, country leaders would rather talk than go to war. Pro does not prove his BOP. Therefore, I have won on this point as well.5. Suez CanalPRO says: "I agree that my argument was refuted, but only a point that also with the help of something, that is out of the Scenario, it was refuted because there was nothing else, CON could do, he has been refuting me because I have voided his arguments. "I win on this point because PRO says himself that this argument was refuted.6. World WarPro drops this point completely. Therefore, I have won on this point.7. World War 1Pro drops this point also. Therefore, I have won on this point also.8. US vs IranPro brings up a new argument: "Now that the U. S. a is sending a ship carrying nuclear missiles, this has a slight chance of being a major war but not the Third World War, this is because if U. S. A nukes Iran, Iran is GOING to surrender, because they do not have the power to fight them, after suck a heavy loss. "It is terrible conduct to bring in a new argument on the last round. PRO even admits himself: " this has a slight chance of being a major war but not the Third World War"He admits himself that there is a chance of a major war but not a third world war. Therefore, PRO concedes this entire debate to me, once again. As a result, I have clearly won this debate. Conclusion:Pro still does not refute the dropped arguments that I have pointed out last round. In fact, this round he has conceded several arguments to me as well as dropping a few more. I have won on all the areas of major clash in this debate. As a result, it is clear that I have won this debate. Furthermore, PRO still does not support his claims that I have pointed out last round. Therefore, CON wins this debate.