Islamic Socialism Is Superior To Atheistic Socialism

Yes my friend but you fail to mention that civilians as in the masses of Sirte, Tripoli and Bani Walid fought for Gaddafhi to the end and beyond. This was a civil war not a simple revolution such as Egypt and Tunisia. Two factions in which the civilian population is divided is a civil war. The Republicans in Spain lost the civil war to the Nationalists and their fascist allies. The Nationalists won, does that mean the Spanish People truly wanted the Nationalists? Does that make the Nationalists and their actions right?"these policies may well be accepted in Islam but there is little support for such detrimental policies in a large proportion of the word."Are you judging this from a Atheistic perspective? What Universal right and wrong are you judging these policies to be right and wrong from? Are you saying sense social pressures say something is right or wrong it makes it so? Did Germany not vote for the Nazis? Did they not judge from their own social pressures that ethnic purification and eugenics were acceptable? Did that make it alright? Are you claiming that since a majority of this world is non-Islamic that certain policies which exist within Islamic society are right or wrong.Gaddafhi himself said that a Libyan committed this crime against humanity, however he did not give the command. Gaddafhi payed compensation to those affected for an act caused by one of his own citizens. Even after this criminal citizen was released returned to Libya. who cost Libya so much, Gaddafhi forgave him and welcomed him as a Libyan.Oh yes lets talk Ba'ath. "the Ba'ath movement shared several characteristics with the European fascist movement, such as "the attempt to synthesize radical, illiberal nationalism and non-Marxist socialism, a romantic, mythopoetic, and elitist 'revolutionary' vision, the desire both to create a 'new man' and to restore past greatness, a centralised authoritarian party divided into 'right-wing' and 'left-wing' factions and so forth; several close associates later admitted that 'Aflaq had been directly inspired by certain fascist and Nazi theorists"(World Fascism: A Historical EncyclopediaPg. 84)Do you really believe Fascism is a legitimate form of Socialism? Fascism in anyform whether Christan, Atheist, or Islamic is wrong. This does not make Atheist, Islamic, or Christian Society better then one another on the basis of how disgusting Fascismfunctions within their world view.You forget to Mention that the Italians had invaded Libya in the 1910's and repressed them under tight imperial rule. You also fail to mention only 100 jews remained in Libya by the time of Gaddafhi's rise to power in 1969. They were made to leave and Gaddafhi later went on to compensate them. You also forget that Gaddafhi was aiding the Palestinians who had been under Zionist oppression for decades. Also are you ignoring all of Gaddafhi's accomplishments and his views on gender equality that I posted in my last argument?Onto Islam itself.Are you asserting Islam is pro-terrorism?“The undersigned, leaders of Islamic movements, are horrified by the events of Tuesday 11 September 2001 in the United States which resulted in massive killing, destruction and attack on innocent lives. We express our deepest sympathies and sorrow. We condemn, in the strongest terms, the incidents, which are against all human and Islamic norms. This is grounded in the Noble Laws of Islam which forbid all forms of attacks on innocents. God Almighty says in the Holy Qur’an: ‘No bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another’ (Surah al-Isra 17:15).”http://kurzman.unc.edu...Furthermore, does Islamic Socialism need to be compatible? Are you claiming since Islamic Morality is contrary to other societies that it is wrong? Is Atheistic morality not contrary to many societies around the world?Also please look over once more Gaddafhi's quotations of the Islamic Socialist view on gender equality.China.... You are saying contemporary China today is a shining example of Atheistic Socialism succeeding. Even the capitalist media is forced to report on the condition of the working class in China. Recently, THE INDEPENDENT (14.01.06) illustrated the conditions of the working class in China by referring to “illegal, exhausting and dangerous conditions”. It went on to discuss a report which stated that “It found an army of powerless rural immigrants toiling up to 14 hours a day, almost every day. Many were allowed just one day off and paid £50 a month for shifts that breached Chinese Law and International Labour Organisation rules”. THE INDEPENDENT is only voicing fears that such a pool of labour puts British capitalism at a competitive disadvantage against lower Labour costs within China allowing them to produce cheaper goods on the world market. The Owners of the INDEPENDENT have no interest in the working class except as a means of exploitation and the acceptance of capitalist ideas. But for Socialists, the existence of such anti-working class conditions, the existence of the wages system and class exploitation demonstrates, from a Marxist position, that China is Capitalist not Socialist.http://www.socialiststudies.org.uk... Since China is not a legitimate socialist country and is possibly one of the worst countries in the entire world for worker's rights it is not really evidence of Atheist Socialism.Also since you have failed to respond about my claims about the ethical dilemma and weaknesses of Atheistic Socialism in earlier rounds I am assuming that you accept them.