It's time to stop the obese from pigging out in restaurants

I'm very happy to have the chance to debate this issue that I find very important. I'd like to state that my opponent's main resolution is that a law will be passed to make it illegal for the obese to over-eat. I'll agree with my opponents definitions except for the definition of obesity and an obese. I'd like to point out that although generally my opponents definition of obesity is right their are other reasons why a person may be fat such as a food disorder. As for my opponent's definition of an obese he uses the cut-off line of a BMI of 30 or over. I'd like to point out that this makes my opponents case contradictory because a person can have a high BMI by being a hard exerciser and building up a huge mass in terms of muscle. Thus my opponent wants to essentially punish people for doing exactly what he is proposing; being exercised and avoiding eating bad food. To further refute my opponents case I will offer up the following contention: C1: The government's main job is to represent the general majority of a given body. My opponent will agree that the majority of people are obese in the U.S. or I assume in his case the U.K; thus that means that majority of people want to be fat. A new law can't be passed into legislation restricting fatness because it is misrepresenting the majority body in that country and thus the government is essentially become oppressive and tyrannical. Further more my opponent has made it very clear that an obese "chose" to be fat; that means the majority of people have the desire to be fat. Thus a law should not be passed because they are doing a morally wrong thing to do by oppressing their people's free will to be fat. The only way a law can be passed restricting this is if my opponent can prove that all fat people have a desire to lose weight which my opponent has obviously been insisting that fat people want to be fat because of their "pigging out". C2: The government is hurting their own economy. My opponent admits that fat people "pig-out" at restaurants. Thus by denying restaurants the ability to serve fast food, which generally tends to be cheaper than fresh produce; my opponent is essentially arguing that unfair burden should be put on the food industry that would result in a massive lost of money as they would lose their best customers. Why should a government have any incentive to hurt their own economy; should fast-food restaurant owners go bankrupt and thus put their families in deep suffering and a lack of affordable food? I'd like to also address that in many cases a fresh organic meal is much more expensive than your average quick meal at a fast food joint. To refute my opponents sole-contention I would like to point out that he has basically countered his own contention; the general majority of people at any given time are not drunk. At a bar we deny alcohol because we don't want people being intoxicated, thus having their actions impaired, resulting in physical and mental suffering at the expense of another patron. Now then if we utilize the fast food argument; first of all at the instant the majority of people are fat then their is more likely to be fat people in a bar then un-fat people as fat people by my opponents rational would always be at a "fat" place. If anything I argue that the majority fat people will be offended by the super-skinny people who can sometimes seem anorexic, be pale, and appear malnourished. Further more the state of being "fat" doesn't cause any actual physical or mental anguish to another person. My opponent argues that people don't want to see fat people yet he argues that the majority of people are obese and the majority of people at these "pig-out" restaurants are fat. So again it would be more weirder and awkward to see a very skinny person in one of these places. Further more the server says "would you like fries with that", because he wants to keep his job and have money to help his own family. The whole point of Capitalism is to increase one's capital; essentially his material possession. At the instant that the modern day economy is built on the theory of Capitalism then the whole point of a restaurant is to maximize its income. Thus they are doing themselves a disservice by denying fat people. Finally, if a fat person wants to make the rational choice to eat fattening foods then why should their right and choice be oppressed on; bear in mind that fat people are the majority opinion. To summarize my case; a government can't infringe on the rights of fat people without undermining their legitimacy by going against the majority, harming their economy, or taking away the right of a fat person to freedom of choice. I will now hand over the debate to my opponent.