I am the only individual in existence with free will.

Resolved: One can rationally support the claim that they are the only individual in exsistence with free will.=================================================================Thesis: In this debate I will assert logically that out of all people who roam the earth, I am the sole individual who has free will; does this mean that I believe I am objectively the only one? Well not exactly, but in essence yes. Truth can be based off of persepctive, take for example the theory of relativity and its conclusions on the speed of an object. Furthermore I have a different definition of free will than most people which holds free will to be more of an experience than anything else, and thus one could imagine that I might argue using the connections between that fact and the perspectives. I would like everyone to know that I have formulated this theory on my own, I will respond as best as I can to all arguments and try to respond so that anyone could understand my point. My goal of instigation is the furthering of the argument not winning neccesarily, so the more logical arguments con makes the happier I am. For this reason, I don't Really care about winning the debate, just improving my stance, which I think is in the best interest of both parties to be honest. You don't have to understand this debate to accept it, you must simply know what you Do Not understand so that you may point it out and I may thus expand my argument but please also be willing lister as well. Thanks, look forward to the debate. Apply in comments.The perspectives 1st person perspective- Your personal perspective, taking into account only what you perceive.(just like in a story) 3rd person detached- observes all things that happen as if looking at them, takes into account every attribute in a situation except the experiences themselves (just like a movie narrator) 3rd person omniscient- This perspective takes into account everything, every perspective and every detail of a situation, even its own. ==================================================================================By acceting this round, you do not accept the following to be true, this is the case, the first argument. (keep in mind this means that acceptance and your first argument are in the same round)The Argument Part 1 1.) Everything in the universe is calculable and thus ‘predetermined’ 2.) As a human individual I could theoretically be put in a position demonstrating the calculable nature of other people and things 3.) As a human individual I could never be put into a position demonstrating my own calculability, this would bare a paradox 4.) Thus from my perspective I am the only individual with free will Thus if we look into this scenaro from a 3rd person detached (narrator's) perspective who is viewing all humans, we would be able to see that nobody has free will, yet if we look from the perspective of an individual, only they (that individual) would have free will, finally if we were to view the situation from everybody's collective and unified perspective, then everyone has free will. The ultimate theme here being, perspective, perspective and its relation to the word and meaning of 'free will/freedom' and 'choice'. Thus, because I am stuck in my mortal and first person based perspective, I can logically, reasonably and rationally say that only I have free will.======================================================================================You accept the following by accepting this debate...Rounds Rules and Regulations 1.) to win I must show that it is reasonable or rational to believe the idea that I am the only person who has free will.2.) Con must prove that such a claim or belief is unreasionable and/or irrational. The debate will come down to whether or not the ideas presented could reasonably be accepted by a person.3.) You accept the premise that determinism is a valid theory. 4.) The above logical proof is not binding and other reasons may exist which support the validity of the resolution so if a part of the logical proof falls it doesn't meant the argument is neccesarily false.5.) Please note that BOP is shared6.)The debate is impossible to accept, doing so without permission is an auto forfeit. comment if interested. 7.)There are 72 hours to respond to each argument and an 8k character limit. 8.) Message me or comment if interested9.) I may request a general outline of your arguments being that I give mine.1.) Acceptance/ arguments from Pro, refutation and arguments from Con.2.) Arguments and rebutals3.) Rebutals4.) Summary and why you win specific arguments and the debate as a whole.