God, Jesus and the Bible are nonsensical.

'It is not my burden of proof to prove God is real, Jesus is divine and true, nor is it my burden of proof to prove the Bible is the inspired word of God. My burden of proof is to prove that the three are not nonsensical.' Then what in the Nine Realms do you mean by 'nonsensical' then? If God is real or Jesus is true, then he is the truth, it makes sense to say they are real; if the Bible is not a book of fiction, then its words are true! Seriously, I don't get why you are shifting the responsibility of the debate like this! A last-resort, perhaps? 'One possible way of trying to determine this is by seeing what the ten highest IQ'ed people on Earth think.' How is IQ in any way relevant? IQ is simply how well someone's problem solving is. Out of any valid points, are you? So desperate that you have to imply that if people with high problem-solving abilities believe in God, then everybody should? Also, those people should be making scientific breakthroughs by now. But the greatest minds of science like Stephen Hawking or Neil deGrasse Tyson are atheists. My hypothesis is that religion is holding them back. 'It is a reasonable philosophical hypothesis that finds its way around the philosophical problem that Atheism must confront...' Reasonable. Do you know what reasonable means? If you find this reasonable, then I'm sure you'll find Allah, the God the Kalam argument was intended for, is reasonable too, also the flying spaghetti monster creating the universe reasonable. 'Atheist must show that A was caused by B was caused by C was caused by D was caused by E, and infinitely. There are infinite mothers, but no first, infinite history with no first event. This is a fallacy of philosophical logic.' No, no it certainly isn't. We already know that there are cycles that sustain pretty much everything in our everyday life. Water in the oceans, water vapor, clouds, rain, groundwater runoff, rivers, back to the sea. For your examples about mothers, we certainly have evolution and abiogenesis to explain that. Again, we are still finding out the origin of the universe, but that doesn't mean in any way that there is a God. 'The Atheist is surrounded by fallacies of philosophical logic, and unlike the creationist, cannot look to "God" for an answer. They can only look at our reality.' I shall repeat the answer because you repeated the question. How many scientific advances would have been lost if Isaac Newton just assumed that God dragged the apple down to the ground? Well listen here. Science is an ever growing beast of unarguable, provable knowledge. We will decode the secrets of the universe, just as we have decoded gravity, light, what the moon is made of (not cheese) and everything that we don't know. But in the meantime, what's most detrimental to human curiosity is to just imply 'God did it'. I would really like to have a permanently correct option 'E. God.' in my science exam for every single question but I'm afraid I'll end up like you. 'Pro responds by saying what caused God?' I shall assume Con responds by saying talking snakes are real? Don't just assume what the opponent will say. 'Pro has said Atheism is proven.' I said science is proven. Atheism just so happens to be in the side of science. 'The Cambrian explosion, or less commonly Cambrian radiation, was the relatively short evolutionary event, beginning around 542 million years ago in the Cambrian Period, during which most major animal phyla appeared quickly, as indicated by the fossil record.' Sigh. God-of-the-gaps again. I'm tired of this. If you're going to use God to explain everything we haven't figured out yet, then God is an ever-shrinking peck of ignorance that gets smaller and weaker every day as science decodes the secrets of the universe, just as we have decoded gravity, light, what the moon is made of (not cheese) and everything that we don't know yet. 'Pro may have missed Rodhocetus.' No, you just didn't bring it up. I don't get what some ancient whale has anything to do with this topic, though. 'Pro may have also missed the 100 million year old wasp and spider trapped in amber who look like...a wasp and spider of today.' No, you just didn't bring it up. I don't get what some ancient insects has anything to do with this topic, though. 'Jedd has threatened me with Christopher Hitchens' videos. I have decided to toss a Christopher Hitchens' video into the ring by my own free will.' Stop feeling the whole world is out to get you. I didn't threaten anybody. I can toss many stupid theists' arguments into the ring too, but I'm not that desperate for evidence. 'Let's look at the Biblical Genesis creation account.' The Bible is right because God says so, and God is right because the Bible says so. 'Think of the Big Bang, then you decide.' The Big Bang theory has been proven. Well, there you go, none of your 'evidence' remains. I look forward to whatever Bible quotes, biased videos, and God-of-the-gaps statements you'll bring next.