"no planes on 9/11" thoery

watch the wtc contruction, do you still think jet feul and office fires pulvarized this building? http://www.youtube.com... What about the nano-thermite (high grade military explosives) found in all three "collapse" sites http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... THE "AMETUER" VIDEOS ARE SOOOOO FAKE! http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... Larry Silverstien (who purchased the WTC towers 2 months before thier destruction with a HUGE insurance poilcy) says we made the desision to "pull it" he was talking about wtc 7 NOT the firmen like he later claims, you say pull them if your refering to human beigs not pull it. obvious. http://www.youtube.com... Usama bin laden "admitting to 9/11" is fake again http://www.youtube.com... <<"Planes are actually made out of a aluminum and titanium alloys, but that is irrelevant. The real question here is one of force and momentum. Assume the weight of the plane to be 400,000 pounds (We'll do this exercise assuming it's completely empty just to make a point). Moving at ~550 mph, it exerts a linear momentum of 220000000 (kg x m) / s. Now the surface area of the applied force is the radius of the interior width of the fuselage squared (10^2) times pi, which is equivalent to ~300 ft^2. Distributing this force across the area gives us 700282 kg per square foot. Now using our common sense, we can assume that the greatest width steel used to construct the tower would be 4 inch steel support beams. Furthermore I can guarantee you that no building has been engineered ever to withstand lateral stresses of that magnitude. And if the plane is indeed applying 700000 kg per square foot of pressure, it's going to pierce the building and continue through it.">> OK so what your saying is this mathimatical equation completley disqualifies the fact that the plane went through the steel building and came out the other side with its nose completley intact (an anylasis of the pixels shows a micro presision match). this is a common technique used by 9/11 white-washers to stump normal people, it doesnt justify a plane going through a biulding. watch popular mechanics get owned http://www.youtube.com... popular mechanics wont debate aj http://www.youtube.com... 936 architectural and engineering professionals and 5162 other supporters including A&E students have signed the petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation. heres there arguements: WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibits all the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics) 1. Rapid onset of "collapse" 2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse 3. Symmetrical "collapse" – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration 4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed mostly in its own footprint 5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds 6. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses 7. Chemical signature of Thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples by physics professor Steven Jones, PhD. 8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples 9. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional 10. Fore-knowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e. 1. Slow onset with large visible deformations 2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires) 3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel 4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never "collapsed As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics) 1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration 2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution 3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction 4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes 5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph 6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking 7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds 8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found 9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front 10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame 11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises 12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples 13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples 14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e. 1. Slow onset with large visible deformations 2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires) 3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel 4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never "collapsed" The World Trade Center Building Designers: Pre-9/11 claims strongly implicate Towers should have remained standing on 9/11 HE SAId THIS BEFORE 9/11 (AND HAS BEEN MISSING SINCE) http://www.nowpublic.com... Like many modern structures and buildings, the WTC Towers were over-designed to withstand weight distribution in the event of structural damage. According to calculations made by the engineers who helped with the design of the Twin Towers, "all the columns on one side of a Tower could be cut, as well as the two corners and some of the columns on each adjacent side, and the building would still be strong enough to withstand a 100-mile-per-hour wind." As well, "Live loads on these columns can be increased more than 2,000% before failure occurs." -Glanz and Lipton, City in the Sky, page 133. -How Columns Will Be Designed for 110-Story Buildings, Engineering News-Record, April 2, 1964: 48-49. 9/11 was an inside job OVER 40% of america agrees. Don't turn your back on this research do something about it no plane missile http://www.youtube.com...