Lebanon would be better without Hezbollah

My opponent should only use English, otherwise I will ignore the Lebanese text which won't be understood by the readers who will later vote. Nonetheless, I will be kind enough to only evaluate the only English statement he brought forth which I found really interesting. Then I will present my arguments. A- Brief critique of my opponent's opening statementMy opponent starts his opening statement with "first of all before judging hezbolla, you should probably read about the history of it. " I assure my opponent that I'm well-informed on the matter, and that I will do my best to show my familiarity with Hezbollah and its practices in Lebanon and abroad. However, I'm forced to state that my opponent's statement is an Ad Hominem logical fallacy, because it attacks me personally by stating that I'm ignorant and misinformed(before I even argued), in an attempt to prove that I'm wrong in saying that Lebanon would be better without Hezbollah. Argumentum ad Hominem is the fallacy of attacking the character or circumstances of an individual who is stating an argument/statement instead of trying to disprove the soundness of the argument/statement itself[1]. Put more bluntly, it is exactly what my opponent did. B- Does Lebanon need Hezbollah to defend its lands? According to what I presented in the first round, Lebanon would no longer need Hezbollah as a resistance if the hypothetical scenario took place. This is the crux of the debate. It is based on a scenario where Hezbollah would submit its weapons to the Lebanese military, who in turn would be trained to use them properly. This scenario would be better for Lebanon because of the following reasons:1- The call for war and peace would be solely in the hands of the Lebanese Defence Ministry and not in the hands of an armed political group with political and religious affiliations to foreign countries like Syria and Iran.2- Hezbollah would become an equal political party to the rest, only practising its rightful freedoms as it is supposed to do in the first place.3- Empowerment of the Lebanese military. Lebanese soldiers would be allowed to fight Israel if anything happened instead of having very passive roles in such wars, and they will be trained based on the "beehive" military tactic which is more useful to Lebanon than the classical one. C- Disadvantages of having Hezbollah in LebanonC1- Hezbollah's fascism which oppresses many Lebanese citizensThere are many examples of Hezbollah's fascism but I'm going to only list a few. I apologize for the graphic images which I will use as evidence alongside the citations.1A- Hezbollah attacking Lebanese towns and villages in 7 and 11 May 2008, slaughtering many innocents, conquering Beirut and forcing the Lebanese Ministry to follow its orders as a result of the conquest[2].1B- Hezbollah's “Either with me or a traitor” belief which they use to give themselves the authority in determining who is a traitor or not, even though high treason should only be determined by the Lebanese government and after thorough investigations. Some evidence for this is 1C, 1D and 1E.1C- Hezbollah attacking peaceful protesters in front of the Iranian embassy and killing Hashem Salman on June 9 2013, and then refusing to allow his burial in his home-town because he is a “traitor”[3]. Note that Hashem is only a young pacifist who is an activist against Hezbollah, and even Hezbollah hasn't claimed or proved that he is an actual traitor. But the “either with me or a traitor” belief got him killed. 1D- Hezbollah having fascistic districts in Dahiyeh and other regions where Sunnah are persecuted and shunned[4], dissenting Shiah are threatened(Such as Sayyed Mohammad Ali El Husseini and many others[5]). Note that Hezbollah even prohibits the Lebanese military from arresting certain suspects from the Dahiyeh[6].1E- Hezbollah's attempt to kill Moustapha Geha for republishing his father's work "Khomeini Assassinates Zarathura" on Saturday April 14, 2012. His father was assassinated previously for his books on 1992 by Hezbollah , who has threatened the son of having a similar fate like his father[7]. Thankfully, the son is currently safe in Sweden after the assassination attempt.1F- Nasrallah's speeches which themselves are full of fascism. For instance, he says that the hands that try to arrest any Hezbollah member must be cut off[8]. C2- Hezbollah's sectarianism and international activitiesIt seems clear that Hezbollah is no longer just a resistance movement that is local to Lebanon, but a worldwide sectarian and terrorist organization with its own agenda. This agenda was announced by its leader Nasrallah in the late 1980s where he announced that Hezbollah's main ambition is to create an Iranian-controlled, Shiah state in Arabia[9]. That clarified, Hezbollah's operations have involved countries other than Lebanon, and have often resulted in the death of many innocents. For example, Hezbollah's involvement in the Syrian war alongside with Bashar Al Assad, which has lead to the death of many casualties in Syria, even when the Syrian rebels are a dangerous threat to Israel according to the Israelis themselves[10]. This shows that Hezbollah's ambition is not to fight Israel, but to participate in a Sunni-Shiah civil war so that the Shiah are victorious. C3- Hezbollah's potential assasination of more 14 March figuresHezbollah has refused to give suspects accused of assassinating Rafik El Hariri and other 14 march figures, even though good evidence has been presented against them11]. Note that Wissam El Eid was assassinated on January 25, 2008 directly after he exposed calls that convicted Hezbollah[12]. This causes suspicion and calls for more efforts to attain world justice, but it also leaves the possibility that Hezbollah would perform more assassinations that target journalists, politicians, authors and activists from the 14 march movement. C4- Hezbollah contradicts the national belonging to the Lebanese countryFinally, Hezbollah's presence means that Lebanon would always be controlled by Iran, and unable to have its own strong military and independent voice in the world. Hezbollah also promises of establishing a nation other than Lebanon, which means that it is essentially an enemy of Lebanese nationalism and not a protector of Lebanon as it claims. Hence, a nationalist with a love for Lebanon should be weary of such a group, which is essentially a mercenary that has attacked its own people and killed many innocents in various events listed above. .. .In summary, my opponent has to write in English and argue that Lebanon would be worse in my hypothetical scenario. He should also counter all my points on Hezbollah being a fascistic, sectarian terrorist organization which is harmful to Lebanon. If he refuses to do the following, he loses the debate. Citations:[1] philosophy. lander. edu/logic/person. html‎[2] "Hezbollah takes over west Beirut". BBC news. 2008-05-09. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 2008-05-10. [3] naharnet. com/stories/en/86432‎[4] now. mmedia. me/lb/en/reportsfeatures/dahiyehs-sunnis-are-no-more[5] persecution. org/? p=6241&upm_export=print[6] yalibnan. com/2011/07/02/nasrallah-not-even-in-300-years-could-hezbollah-suspects-be-arrested/[7] frontpagemag. com/2012/arnold-ahlert/lebanese-reformer-seeks-safe-haven/[8] dailystar. com. lb/News/Politics/Nov/12/Nasrallah-We-will-not-allow-arrest-of-fighters. ashx[9] youtube. com/watch? v=yIGxYa_-59w‎[10] israelhayom. com/site/newsletter_article. php? id=7883[11] dailystar. com. lb/News/Politics/2011/Jul-04/Nasrallah-refuses-to-hand-over-accused. ashx[12] huffingtonpost. com/2012/10/19/wissam-al-hassan-dead_n_1987809. html huffingtonpost. com/2012/10/19/wissam-al-hassan-dead_n_1987809. html