A Christian Should Vote Conservatively

So I accept my opponent's challenge. I reject this resolution since it supposes that every christian is only going to have Christian beliefs, and it completly avoids the constituation (I am assuming my opponent is talking about the United States, for obvious reasons). Contention I: The United States was founded on a multi-party system. This may seem odd as we have deterred down to just three parties, Democrat, Liberal, and Republican, but it is completely relevant. My opponent is supposing that you should not be allowed to vote another party because of your religion. What we must see is this is completely false. A Christian has the right to vote for whatever party they wish, while they may with agree the Christian religion it may not be everything they believe. What I mean is a Christian maybe believe that Jesus is god's son and he came back from the dead, but they also may not believe with the politician's foreign policy or tax beliefs. The many party's of the american system allow for more than just religion. This bringing me to my second contention. Contention II: The United States was founded on freedom of religion, and separation of church and state. This is only really relevant in theory, but it should still be considered since we are talking about the United States' government system and therefore we must look to the constitution. In the constitution it says that there must be a freedom of speech, 1) you get to choose your religion and 2) the party you vote for, not 1) you choose the religion and that gives you what party you vote for. The constitution also says separation of church and state, this means that the nominees ideals shouldn't just be from their religion. This means that the nature of the resolution alone contradicts the United States' constitution, and for that we must reject it. Contention III: The resolutin avoids th social contract according to John Locke. John Locke's social contract says that each many has a right to life, liberty, and possions. My opponent by affirming the resolution is removing liberty from chirsitans and making them vote for a prisedent they may not like. I don't feel it is neccesary to explain further. My opponent's case:I will attack my opponent's case as follows:1)Voting for a conservative canidate grants power to christians. ("Conservatives are Bible-based and gives power to the people who try to follow God").2)Protects people (of god) from a sinful government. In my opponent's case he completly avoids the constitution (and the social contract). My attacks are as follows:1) This is an a complete oboition to the constitution, since it says sepration of chruch and state. The prisedent would simply be avoiding this by creating laws that were just for the chrisitans and by doing this they are fundemantal removing the rights of every indidivdual in America that does not believe in the Christian god. For this reason we must reject this reason for affirming the resolution, since it violates America. 2) This really relates back to my 1st contention about how they make like the christian values in a prisedent but thy may not like their forigen policy. We must reject this resolution as it removes liberty from Christans, and it creates an America that goes against everything our founding fathers fought for. Sorry for the delay in my posting, I lost internet connection while typing.