Quote debate

REFUTATIONS: I am refuting my opponent refutations, I am going in order. 1) My opponent extended his first quote, however this was refuted in the comments section, and my opponent accepted this, so this extension can not stand. 2) I agree, there is one definition drop my argument. However, I think this was not the main part of his speech, so not by reading this one quotation, can you see the meaning. And not by this quote can we differ anything from it, since the whole speech has to be used, to truly grasp the meaning of it. 3) My opponent claims that I did not specify a reason not to make fun of someone, but do I really even have to? It's just senseless, obnoxious, and just childish, to jab at other people without a reason. Also my opponent has no prove that he would still drown, even though he was taller, and even if this was true, he could breath through his nose. So the Gary Coleman quote has no logic. 4) I do this with his Churchill quote. 5) Do you honestly think that Stalin, was pointing out a flaw in humanity? That was the way Stalin looked at it which made him an evil man. My opponent said we can look to Nietzsche because he was a bad person, and Hitler adopted his ideas, and if you accept the quote you accept Hitler, well this is just the same. If you accept this quote you accept Stalin's views, because this is how he viewed it, therefore we can not look to this. You can extend how I said he was evil, this was not refuted. MY QUOTATIONS: 1) Why do I need internal warrants, this is what my opponent said against my Kant quote, but he never specified why I need internal warrant so the voters can disregard this point. 2) A: No matter, apparently to my opponent Stalin is acceptable, therefore Nietzsche is acceptable. B: Stalin killed his people, and was a main cause in WWII, who is better? And even so this does not disregard the fact that he had a great mind, and had great teachings. C: My opponent does not provide any proof, that this specif teaching has ties to Hitler, therefore you can not look to it, even if some have ties to Hitler, does not mean that his specif quote has ties to him. D: My opponent states that fear has nothing to do with morality, which is making the wrong and right decisions. However fear of an outcome can compel you to make a decision therefore, it does, therefore this argument can be dropped. 3) My opponent states that this quote is untrue, I have two responses: 1) This quote was not meant to be taken literally, however to ponder over it. 2) It just shows the flaws in society, how everyone by nature is self centered, and selfish at heart. Obviously it is not true by the definition of recession, but it shows the selfishness of mankind. 4) First of all you can extend the fact, that his Churchill quote is unrealistic, because no one is happy about failing, therefore all this offense is taken out. Mine just makes more sense, if I am a pessimist, I say this is so hard, if I am an optimist, I say I will gain from this. In your quote you say, I just failed, and I'm happy. That just makes no sense. My quote is more realistic, and contains more logic. 5) Yes I agree some are made of lamb, but if you look at the same article, it can be made out of a cow. Also he said there is no evidence of George Carlin actually killing a cow, what? This was supposed to be a funny quote, because it shows how people wear animal skins, and they have to kill the animals, and that is essentially murder. And there are so many witnesses, and nobody cares! So I don't need evidence, this was a joke, you can extend my quote, and I urge a ballot for me. ------------------------My opponent's new quotes------------------------- 1) There are a couple problems with this. 1) Not everyone view a birth as a miracle, people find it to be a curse, and that is why there are abortions, and even they kill the babies outside of the womb. So the logic in this quote is just flat out wrong. 2) I think this is supposed to be funny, but I don't find it funny at all. And secondly, some people are afraid of clowns, or just don't find them funny. So this is not true for all people, therefore you can disreragd it. 3) You are not naive just for spending two dollars on water, 1) The quote never specifies how much water it is, it could be 100 gallons, that would be a good deal to me, and secondly people may find the taste better, and would be willing to sacrifice the extra money. 4) There are a few promblems, 1) Is there such thing as a mortal who knows everything, no there is not. Therfore the wise need can gain more knowledge at any time, so they should have the ears open. Also this sets a bad precedent, because this leads to only helping stuggling people, and not paying attention to the stronger ones. 5) Voters, you can not look to this quote because he never states why they wont work, therefore this lacks informations so we can not look to it. MY QUOTES: 1. Barack Obama will appeal to both black and white voters in America. White voters who'll think he's Tiger Woods. -Frankie Boyle 2. If you can count your money, you don't have a billion dollars. J. Paul Getty 3. Happiness: We rarely feel it. I would buy it, beg it, steal it, Pay in coins of dripping blood For this one transcendent good -Amy Lowell 4. "Have the courage to live. Anyone can die. " -Robert Cody 5. "In the first place, God made idiots. That was for practice. Then he made school boards. " - Mark Twain I urge a con ballot! Thank you readers and opponent for looking at this debate. I am sorry for the late response, as you know Thanksgiving is tomorrow and I had buisness to attend to.