bible presuppose sense, therfore its false

There are multiple gaping holes in this argument. First, there is no coherent logic behind the text of the pro's speech. The pro says that the Bible is a figment of our imaginations, as if suggesting we subconsciously made it. Many people claim that the Bible is unaccredited, unwarranted, a piece of fiction. But this is supported by cold, hard facts: You, as the pro is using "you," did not make the bible in any circumstance. The "you" the pro uses, which refers to the voters who shall decide the ballot of this debate, can't have made the Bible, as there are versions of the bible far older than the voters here (eg. the Kings James Version). Second, it's highly unlikely the writers of the Bible wrote the bible as if they were in a dream. If that were true, the Bible would be an incoherent mess no one would bother to read. Clearly, this is not true, given Christianity is one of the world's leading religions. Third, the very title of the pro's argument does not relate to the actual text. "Bible presuppose sense, therefore it is false"? The argument claims that the creators of the Bibles' senses was not in a complete conscious state. Clearly they contradict with each other. Fourth, there is absolutely no statistics, evidence that supports any of what the pro says. While this is attributed to the Bible frequently ( I will argue that the Bible's negative connotation resulting from this lack of statistics is unwarranted), this is definitely attributable to the pro's arguments, and deserves to serve as a drawback to the pro's claims. From what I can see, not only is there no logic behind the construction of the speech, there is nothing that supports it-- in other words, it is GROUNDLESS. Clearly, what is driving the pro to make this claim is an unwarranted, unsupported bias of the Bible. This leads me to my primary offcase: a Kritik of the bias against Christianity In mainstream culture, the Bible is interpreted as this piece of fiction which has no link to the world. This has led people to criticize it, along with its believers, as a bunch of idiots who are wasting their time. One major contention they frequently bring up is a lack of statistics, evidence that ties the Bible to the world. This criticism can be seen all over the Internet, ranging from caustic Youtube comments to rants on Tumblr, as well as this very 1AC. But all of these rants-- the pro's 1AC included-- have one major thing in common: they have not truly felt what Christianity is. They have taken a glance at it, not even opened the Bible, and then continued to blast it. All of these posts nurture a world in which we do not closely examine issues, and give "YES" or "NO" stamps on, and move on. This culture of shallow examination has broad levels of consequences, ranging from not caring about what goes on outside our bubble, to not giving caring when such deep issues (eg. Ferguson) comes to impact us. While it doesn't have that much of a tangible impact (like lives lost), I believe this loss of analysis is just as poisonous to us as citizens. Thus, I propose an alternative. The alternative is to embrace the Bible not so much as a set of facts listed out on a textbook but as a set of moral values, something that's BELIEVED, not TAUGHT.