A language that everyone memorizes

Rebuttal1) "The implementation of such a language would be impossible to complete due to logistical, societal, and fiscal limitations"Please list claimed fiscal, logistical, and societal limitation(s) that prevents the succession of the implementation of such a language, please.2) "Due to the aforementioned reasons, specific regions would be unable to learn the language, and they would not be able to understand the rest of the world (ironically, exacerbating the issue that was being "fixed")"If at least SOME specific regions won't be able to learn, and adapt to, the new language (Although you can translate the definition (From English (Or the heritage language of the person who implements it)) to THEIR language)(Unless their language isn't mentioned anywhere), it won't make a difference for them whether or not we implement the language; Say, there's a japanese person who can't speak their language. Either languages, said region will never understand said japanese man.Also, there's a benefit. Some specific regions may not be able to learn it, however, there may be some which will do. And now we'll have proper communication (If both people have not memorized the other's language). Take advantage of that; It wouldn't be costing anyone.3) "Due to the nature of human society, the language would quickly be bastardized by the cultures of specific areas of the world, hindering communication in the future as different dialects are formed"So?4) "Given the mono-linguistic tendencies of many countries (such as the United States), the implementation of a common language will force the previous language to be lost and with it, much of the culture of the region"There may be a tendency to lose knowledge of some words in your primary language. However, from it being your heritage, you can NOT lose knowledge of the entire language itself. It's like trying to learn German as an American, speaking English.5) "The roots of the language would have to come from somewhere, and that place being favored could be seen as prejudicial and unfair"No, it doesn't. A country (Or any particular region) is not a prerequisite for a language. It may form the cultural portion. However, that is not a prerequisite; Not only is it a translation of words from ALL language, but its PURPOSE is for everyone to understand each other, which is useful in case of an emergency.6) "Attempts at this very goal have been going on for a long time (see: tower of Babel fable) and none have yet succeeded"That attempt, I admit, was pitiful; No matter the fact that the Lord duplicated the Tower of Bable onto ALL places, they simply were letters with no translation of definition for ANYONE to ever understand, neither did the Lord EVER define such new words[1]. Also, we'll never even begin to succeed, IF WE NEVER TRY!7) "The different speaking styles, syntax, and accents of different regions would hinder comprehension even in a common language"But not like they can't learn new styles and syntaxes, and adapt to the accent, of said language. Also, this is SOME! Like said in my response to your 2nd contention, "There's a benefit. Some specific regions may not be able to learn it, however, there may be some which will do. And now we'll have proper communication (If both people have not memorized the other's language). Take advantage of that; It wouldn't be costing anyone."8) "The unique perspectives of different cultures, reflected heavily in their language, would be a terrible thing to lose"I've already debunked this.9) "The transitory period in which children were learning this new language would create a barrier between them and previous generations in that they could not communicate well with them"Not a barrier, but a puzzle that has to be completed before proper communication; That's what it really resembles; They may not have proper communication anymore, because the practice of a new language may result in a loss of knowledge of words in THEIR heritage/primary language. However, I have not aforementioned this, but if there aren't present English words in your mind (Let's refer to an American) during the practice, then they surely aren't if you were practicing, thus having the equal chance of loss of knowledge.Also, say there's a Japanese and an American who can't speak each other's language. I have aforementioned this example, but they won't understand each other. So, this possibility doesn't overshadow this argument, but evens up.10) " Unique connotations of specific words in a language would be literally lost in translation as the whole of human experience (in terms of literature) would have to be translated into the new language"Take a look at it this way; Let's say, me! I am developing a language. Having remembered MY primary/heritage language, if I implement a word, I should be able to define it in MY language. So, in MY language, I will have it translated in all existent (On the list) languages for ALL people to understand it.I await my opponent's next set of arguments.Source[1] Genesis 11: 1-9