It isn't wrong for a person to be gay.

The Universe has no stance on death, rape or abortion? Whatever do you mean? The Universe itself has no self-consciousness. The Universe has no opinion. It is only a vessel (speaking in relational terms). The universe does not decides what happens. It is only a place for which these things can happen in. Say like, "There is a box of water, then someone drops a rock in the water, causing splashes and movement. The box is the universe, it had nothing to do with the rock being dropped except host the event. The water is all the things in life. The movement in the water is the activity that happens in life. The rock is the external influence that puts everything in motion. We intend to look upon things that is only in the box, and we forget to look on what"s happening outside the box. As the box is everything we can observe, to where outside is the supernatural influence. Not supernatural as in paranormal, supernatural as in spiritual. This example is best explained by Dr. Del Tackett from the Video Series, "The Truth Project" To explain God"s existence to my best at the moment is to give you a paragraph from a research paper I did a year back. Here: "Science is, basically, what we use to prove something real through testing, and observations. So how can we use tested observations to prove God. Manly we will use the environment. [One] simple thing right? Let"s look at our home, Earth. Just see how perfect our living space is. The whole place is just right. The size is the right amount for gravity, and atmosphere. Our world is at a perfectly calculated distance from the sun for temperature. The moon is also at the right distance for pressure against the Earth. Without the moon, we would have almost no ocean waves and no natural light for the night. The atmosphere is so precise with its layers to keep the right substances inside, like: Oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, moisture, and heat. If there was even a slight change in the make-up of our atmosphere, we would all die. Life would be impossible. If there were any slight changes to any of these placements, there could be no life. Random chance cannot produce such exact conditions. It is just impossible. It"s like they are designed. Is there a solution? Yes, there is God. He created the conditions for us. Just right for human beings to live, and not for any other intellectual species. Earth was specifically made for us. So our environment shows it cannot even exist without a creator" ("This principle of causation is so fundamental that if I said that the chair you are sitting on, which must have had a beginning, just popped into existence without any cause, you might justifiably think I need a psychiatric assessment!" -Don Batten)" To see my entire paper (The topic, if God created the Universe, then Who Created God) you can go to the provided link to read the document on google drive yourself: https://drive.google.com... The opinion I think your trying to point out is that the evidence we see in our surroundings points to a creator. True, but let me clarify, the perspective you are viewing this is in a way that the Universe put it there. But it did not. If it did, you would be right and we can stop debating. God put it there: The plants, animals, insects, and laws of nature, all of it! God created the Universe. The Universe did not create itself. Should I remind you that the "Theories" you have are still speculative. It"s not odd at all. We see the world around us, and then we interpret it. We can only use what we have today to find out what happened back then. We interpret the world through the Bible, you interpret the world through the Origin of Species. We all have the same evidence, but different interpretations. The question is, "Which story fits best with the world?" So far, your "Big Bang Theory" is still a theory, because it has not been scientifically proven. In fact, the last I checked, it still defies the laws of thermodynamics. That"s why you can"t call it The Law of the Big Bang. Religion and science cannot, together or alone, discover our origin. They both strive to find out, but still, we can only use our best interpretation. It"s all left up to conviction. Plus, Christianity and science do coexist with each other. Just that it does no coexist with Darwin"s interpretation of science. Evolution is real. Now, don"t be so shock at my statement. The evolution of species, as interpreted by Evolutionary scientists, is false (to our claim). But the evolution of the Cell Phone is true. Man can evolve his tools. Making them better, to improve their performance when in use. The evolution of Video Games is real. The Evolution of computers is real. The Evolution of Transportation is real. See, it"s not so confusing; and notice how all of it is influenced by a creator. A human creator, changes his tools to best suite his needs. You address that society rallies behind leaders to form tribes, which will eventually become nations. They set a moral standard. So right there, you just said that there is right and wrong. The issue we are not Seeing Eye to eye is that there is a Universal Moral Standard. This is where Truth has to prevail. The moral Standard has to be set be the sovereign authority. The one who rules all. No there are other leaders, who are human, who come up with their own moral code, and to him it is right. But in Truth, is it really? Moral Codes do have to be established to avoid chaos, and the whole point of this debate is whether or not being Gay, violates that moral code. If there is no universal moral code, then people would not follow leader"s moral standards unless it met their personal interest. That means if the standard no longer met that personal requirement, then the moral standard no longer applies. Why should the ideas of one religion be favored over another? Because not all religions speak Truth. Truth belongs to one. Truth does not change. Wherever you go, no matter what you have heard or seen, Truth has no mixed opinions. It is one, universal view. Some other religions may poses some moral codes that identifies itself with the Truth, but in all honesty, it is not perfect. To be a True Religion, it has to be 100%. Saying science replaces religion is like saying the Legislative Branch no replaces the Executive Branch. No, Religion is the study of the Truth, Philosophy is the study of our moral codes, and Science is the study of our environment. We need all of it. Man can make Morals, but Man did not make the idea of morality. Morality is an idea that was implemented into creation. Our wisdom and knowledge can only go as far as what is in creation. Try something for me. Can you imagine a new thing? A new something that does currently exist that has anything relational to what has already been created? We cannot. We cannot imagine ourselves a new color on the visible spectrum. We cannot imagine a creature that has no body parts or purposes in relation to body parts or purposes of creature we have today, etc" Since when has criminalizing has ever benefited humanity. Perhaps, a criminal act may better a society, but what about the individual who is victimized in the process. You see, the view you just placed in that we should do our best to benefit the bigger side of society, whether or not the lesser of the society get hurt or not. This is where you again are introducing right and wrong. I do not believe in bettering just one select group. All should be benefited. Though I do see the point where only one can be benefited, or in some cases, saved. But at the perspective that there is a right and wrong to it. Yes, there are also countries that change their culture and claim that their morals are right, all for the purpose of stability. The issue is that there is a universal code for us to follow. Also, who do you think made the establishment of a democratic people? CHRISTIANITY! Christians established the United States of America"s governmental establishment. Saying we need to be able to agree and disagree with other"s beliefs is agreeing with the view of Christianity. It is the way we use to make sure people are not stepping out of place. Making sure that the moral code is being upheld in the right way. It is also the way so that others can hear the Word of God, so that they may be ministered to. It is also that we may hear other"s views so that the claim that Christianity is so closed minded, is invalid. We hear you, and would like to talk about it. That"s basically why we have this debate system. Why do animals not have morals? It is because they were not set on the earth to rule. Man was placed in creation to rule the plants, animals, and land that God provided. Animals are supplies to our needs. Whether it is for pets, for using equipment, or for food. Animals do not have a place to be elevated over man. They will never evolve into intelligent beings. They will never build buildings on their own. They will never change their form enough into that of intelligent design; and they will never form a society advanced enough to be able to form complex communication so that the can build phones and send each other emotes and selfies. And this is why it is wrong for a person to be gay.