911 inside job

Did you watch any of the videos ? Can you come up with any reasons why the videos are full of lunacy ?Yea AE911truth.org is superior , because to learn all the information would takes a long long time , rather i provided Yall with videos with summary of information from ae911truth.orgMaybe yea I missed quote marks etc and made spelling errors , I dont have all day to check my spelling and quotation marks , Its not my job to educate you but you yourself.Its not my job to educate you on world history, CIA drug dealing etc is well known , check the contras http://en.wikipedia.org...;Sorry for my spelling errors, my spelling at the end of the day has nothing to do with whether 911 was an inside job.'Second why would they wait so long, and leave such a damning piece of evidence?' Im not sure what exactly you are referring to here.???The problem with claiming terrorists bombed the building etc is how they had access to one of the most secure buildings in the world.The official report does not 'Easily explain' how the building collapsed.There was no testing done on the steel beam that failed, it was assumed that it failed. Assumption isnt science.Basically they figured around with the inputs in their computer simulation untill the column failed without any hard evidence or testing on the steel that collapsed , hahahaNever in the history of the world has a High rise steel structure collapsed due to fire, before or after 911. Thermal expansion the NIST theory is not considered reputable or all large steel structures would have to be rebuilt because small fires can bring them down.For an indepth analysis of the fraud commited by NIST regarding building 7 , AE911 truth has debunked it herehttp://www.ae911truth.org..."there is evidence of molten steel"Im glad you brought up this quote from NIST, as you clearly didnt watch the videos I showed you . It clearly debunks NIST assumption that the molten material that was flowing from the south tower was aluminium , why ? No scientist in the world has been able to melt aluminium with plastics,rugs, curtains or any other material to get the molten aluminium to become yellow in color. This is because molten aluminium is silver and not yellow FEMA studied steel samples before the rest of the steel was shipped and sold to china and found molten steel . NIST however ignored this evidence and hand picked steel , imagine if there were a plane crash and they sold the plane parts to china before doing any testing on them, the investigation is a farce ! "Even if they terrorists really did hijack the planes ,"I dont know what your talking about a more logical explanation is they knew the terrorists would strike and therefore placed explosives in the buildings .I dont blame bush for 911 ... hes really dumb. I dont blame the government either , but a rouge group of international criminals who have hijacked the american system , just as kennedy warned before he was shot . These criminals control the military industrial complex, SAIC is one of these companies and the number one suspect. Nanothermite technology was declassified in 2001 , but debunkers retardedly say that Nanothermite didnt exist before 2001 because it wasnt 'invented' yet. With the same logic you could say you were not getting bombed by a stealth bomber saying it doesnt exist because the US government hadnt invented it yet, even though it was declassified 40 years after it was actually invented.You could also believe that the US and its military companies are so backward that they would use ancient technology , wiring up explosives, as if they wouldnt use remote devices to initiate an explosion... dumb dumb dumb Fireproofing was upgraded on the EXACT floors where the fires were on 911 for both towers , coincidence ?The fireproofing was unknowingly applied to the steel beams by people who had no idea that the 'paint like ' material consisted of nanothermite explosives .Your cartoon is the stupidest thing I have ever seen in my life , sorry. Why would firefighters and airline pilots , house of representatives, air traffic control , people etc have to have been ' in on it ' It is totally unnecessary to have these people involved in a conspiracy.They were innocent victims who had no idea what was going on ...Luckily we dont need to rely on the ASSUMPTIONS of Maddox or yourself when evualating whether it was possible or not for the conspiracy to have happened as the hard scientific evidence proves it was a controlled demolition and we dont need to asssume anymore. How they did it and who did it is what many people are researching and they are making good progress.a good little quote from David ray griffin shows this. "This argument is, for one thing, based partly on the belief that it is impossible for big government operations to be kept secret very long. However, the Manhattan Project to create an atomic bomb, which involved some 100,000 people, was kept secret for several years. Also, the United States provoked and participated in a civil war in Indonesia in 1957 that resulted in some 40,000 deaths, but this illegal war was kept secret from the American people until a book about it appeared in 1995. It also must be remembered that if the government has kept several other big operations hidden, we by definition do not know about them. We cannot claim to know, in any case, that the government could not keep a big and ugly operation secret for a long time.Operation Gladio is another conspiracy im sure you have never heard of , they got away with murdering innocent civilians and kept it a secret from you ... http://en.wikipedia.org...