There is more evidence that God does not exist, than there to is prove that he does.

Pro argues that a infinite number of universes exist, and that there was no "first" universe. As I said, this is absurd. There have to exist a uncaused being which caused the absolute first universe of which all the other universes came from, because if the cause of the universe had a cause ad infinitum, then there wouldn’t be a universe to talk about in the first place. Basically, if the universe 1, followed another temporal cause (2), and universe 2 followed another temporal cause (universe 3), and this went on ad infinitum, we wouldn’t have the universe 1 in the first place. So a uncaused being have to exist because of this rational necessity, and this being is no more than God himself, who are uncaused. However, this theory is not proven anyway, and thus I don't even have to try and refute it.You said that 'it is highly improbable to me that the Universe was created and is controlled by an eternal being who has the power to do anything, then spends his time doing nothing.'That's your opinion, and thus I don't need to say more than that. But I gave clear examples of design which must have a creator behind, and clearly showed that a uncaused being must exist, because of the absurdity of a infinitive regress of past causes. Also, you don't know what God did after that or this, and so you cannot say that he spend his time doing nothing. He probably does something. You said 'Well, the complete Bible was finished several centuries before the Qur'an was. And the Qur'an mentions passages from the Bible a few times. Islam is therefore a follow up religion.'Just because the Bible was finished several centuries before the Quran was, and the Qur'an mentions passages from the Bible a few times, that doesn't mean that Islam could not exist without Christianity. Also, Islam is not a follow up religion. As I said, Islam is not a new religion which was invented after Christianity. Islam has always been and will always be. And even if Islam was a follow up religion, that would not prove that it could not exist without Christianity. You answers to my question as to how Islam could not exist without Christianity, is a failure.You asked 'If God is omnipotent, then we have no free will, do we?'. According to Islam, even due God is omnipotent, we have a free will. God knows everything, including if we will believe in him or not, but our choice of believing in God or not, is completely ours. God knows if we will believe in him or not, from our free will. Let me give a example: You made a choice to disobey God. God did of course not force you to disobey him. You made that choice. But God knew that you would make that choice, because he is all-knowing. Just because God knew that you would disobey him, and the fact that He permitted you to do so, does not change the fact that you had free will and made the choice yourself. What you did, is just confirming what God already knew.You said '..but it seems that Islam, quite conveniently, has all the angles covered, just in case one day, someone might challenge it. Your answers are not convincing me, sorry.'I didn't understand what you meant with that. Anyway, I'm sorry my answer wasn't convincing for you. You said 'I don't really have much to say about this, except that everybody knows that this is impossible to do. There is no mathematical or scientific way to achieve it. To say "yes" is a laughable answer.'That was not all I said. What I said after that is basically that God can do everything, but to say that God can do anything which includes even things which is impossible, is irrational and absurd, because what must be understood is that things which is impossible, is not an aspect of omnipotence. Its like saying “an omnipotent being cannot be an omnipotent being.' Concerning the Ancient Egyptians and Greeks. You said that I said that people went back in time, thousands of years to spread the word of God as he is known in Islam. This is not what I said at all. You are making a straw man here. Please, read again what I said, carefully. Islam is NOT a new religion. God sent prophets to all people of all time whith the message to submit to God and him alone (Islam). However, if some people never heard this message, then they will get a second chance in the afterlife. And in my opinion, Zeus was not a real God. He was just one of hundreds of other pagan idol gods which the Greeks worshiped.You then said 'As for your final answer, " God can, if he wants, choose not to know something", I'm sorry, but this is a ridiculous answer, that suggests even if there were a God, he is useless and pointless.'I really don't see why God is useless and pointless just because he choses to not know something. If I chose not to know if Barcelona will win against Real-madrid, would that make me useless and pointless? I can, by simply just seeing it at TV, but choses not to.SummaryPro has failed to refute my argument in my first round, which was the teleological argument. He also failed to refute my argument that a uncaused being must exist because of the absurdity of an infinite history of past causes. The closest he came to refute my arguments, is saying that the universe is eternal and thus doesn't need a creator, and giving the multiverse theory. I refuted both of these. Also, a lot of what Pro said doesn't have anything to do with my case. He for example started to ask questions about God and Islam. These questions doesn't disprove God or my case, and I don't know why Pro started making arguments against God which he thought disproves God, when he said in his first round that there is no definitive proof that God does not exist. It was me who should give evidence for God, and when I gave them, he completely failed to refute them. I on the other hand refuted every claim Pro made, like the universe being eternal and coming from another universe (The Multiverse Theory). I also answered all the questions which Pro gave. Pro also gave zero sources. I strongly urge a vote for Con.Thank you and thank you Dan for this great debate. I'm also looking forward to exchange other views with you in the future.