JK Rowling's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was plagiarized from Willy the Wizard

Of course some highly educated people will backup Pelosi and Gingrich's statements because they are supporters, not truthful. Plus their statements don't relate to defend Rowling in their day in court. You wrote: "I still say that 44 similarities ideas can be a coincidence because it happens many times. Such as similarities between "Alice in Wonderland" and "Spirited Away", "Pokemon" and "Digimon", "Star Wars" and "Gundam" series have a lot of similarities and their many more examples. The truth is that neither of them sued each other because they are all have ides and concepts, well ideas and concepts are not protected by copyright laws. " Well Allen's four lawyers still say that Rowling plagiarized and violated the copyrights from Willy the Wizard (1). These four lawyers are smart enough to know about the copyright laws and they know that Rowling did plagiarized and violated the copyrights from Willy the Wizard and the way that Rowling plagiarized, the "idea are not protected by copyrights" is not a factor in Rowling's plagiarism, according Allen's four lawyers. You wrote: "Well the judge has not ruled or declared Paul Allen as the winner yet and the judge said that his case is "improbable". " The judge said that it is "improbable" but the judge did not declared Allen as the loser yet and know that he will be declared the winner. When you tried to debunk Nick Kounoupias' statements ""If the claim does proceed, then JK Rowling and Bloomsbury will be required to explain how the similarities between the two works came about, when to date there has been a refusal to disclose key manuscripts and notebooks. " Then you wrote "My answer to him is that both authors used the common uses of literature and other fiction, just like any author or fictionist would use. Wizard is very common to the literature world. Boy as the protagonist are common to the fiction world too. Authors of tournaments for their books can are easy and very common to the fiction and real life world. One of Allen's claims that similarities that "both protagonist had help", well protagonist normally have companions to help him on the hero's quest, said so on my first round You Tube vides. This is the writing industry, companionship is one of the most common uses in literature and Paul Gregory Allen who suppose to have knowledge in the writing industry forgot or don't realized that companionship is one the most common uses in literature and other fiction. In other words, Paul Allen and his lawyers know zip about literature and the common uses in fiction so Allen wouldn't know what could have been plagiarizes and what were from the common uses in literature for the Goblet of Fire. Monsters are also common in literature. Another piece that Paul Allen does not realize. I just don't get how you can miss something simple, as monsters, boy heroes, wizards and companionship are the common uses in literature and other fiction, it just makes no sense. " Well the truth is that all of the stories have all of these aspects. "Samurai Jack" did not have any "companionship". So this does not mean that all books will have this and they all books and fiction will have a different chemistry of "troupe" (2). With Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire", it has all the same "troupe" and same concepts, settings and etc (3). Kitchin J expressed the view that it was improbable that the action would succeed – but this was Willy's day of triumph (4), so Paul Allen won that round against Rowling, Bloomsbury and their lawyers. Sadly for Rowling and Harry Potter fans, but I know Rowling did plagiarized on Willy the Wizard (5) because there are numerous similarities (6). I would like to thank for this debate and I hope I become the winner and please vote for me. (1). http://townhall.com... (2). http://tvtropes.org... (3). http://www.scribd.com... (4). http://ipkitten.blogspot.com... (5). http://www.scribd.com... (6). http://jetl.wordpress.com...