Time travel is impossible / time does not exist

My opponent addresses very little of what I actually said. First, I will address his main point that has a source, then come back to the little stuff. My opponent states that we've managed to get particles to travel faster than the speed of light, and so relativity is "shattered." I will address this in two points. 1) The results of the CERN experiment have not been independently confirmed yet, and so should be taken with a grain of salt until then. Everyone familiar with the scientific process knows that you have to have independent testing for verification. 2) This does not "shatter" relativity. The only thing this shatters is the concept that nothing can accelerate faster than the speed of light. Which is technically still true. Current theories as to why these particles reached their target faster than light mostly fall down to multi-dimensional tunneling (the same known process that allows beta radiation to exist). My opponent's own source says, "Zichichi speculates that the "superluminal" neutrinos detected by OPERA could be slipping through extra dimensions in space, as predicted by theories such as string theory." While this adds something predicited by string theory (which M-theory, a multiverse theory, is built off of), it does not disprove the time dilation effect of special relativity, nor show that time is not a part of spacetime. Now moving on to the other things. "You claim it has been 100% proven by human testing and seen in nature. Yet you do not post the links of this supposed proof." I posted links to articles about Muons, and the atomic clock tests. These are the same quality as the only link that my opponent posted last round regarding the superluminal neutrinos. If he is to reject my links, he must reject his own. As he has accepted his own, he must accept mine. "Your argument sounds exactly like the Science Channel every time they have a show on about time travel. Very convoluted, not explaining anything. It sounds like a science fiction movie trying to explain something that is impossible." This is not an argument, but an attack. No counter argument needed. "You can not prove that there is a "multiverse" and even if there was, what force governs which multiverse you are sent back into when traveling back in time." I don't have to prove that, as my BoP is to show that time travel is not impossible. I only need to refute any attempts to show time travel is impossible and show that there are theories which fit the known laws of nature that allow the potential of time travel. That said, my arguments showing that time is a real attribute to nature in the form of spacetime is confirmed. And no real refutations were presented against the possibility of time travel. In fact, my opponent's own (and only) source says that it is in aggreement with string theory, which has it's own multiverse theory tied to it. I will relist the used sources here, even though they were used in previous rounds. http://www.scientificamerican.com... http://www.nature.com... http://www.physlink.com... If my opponent would like more sources for the same thing, here are more. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu... http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu... http://teachers.web.cern.ch...