The user "ark428" is a horrible troll

Happy to see you've responded. Sad to see another vague insult thrown almost immediately. Now I'll defend my points: 1. I am not a mythical beast. I think that you incorrectly regarded this as a point. This existed simply as an observation as to why you were sourcing a page that clearly defines Troll as a mythical beast with me. I recognized later on that you had severely contradicted yourself with different definitions of troll. 2. I claim to be Intelligent. Again, you incorrectly regarded this as a point. I was pointing out how rude, and slanderous you are being without actually fact checking. You falsely call me stupid for no reason in your original post, and my example of my IQ was simply a means to show that your arguments and slander are not backed. 3. XStrikeX is a troll. Well, XStrikeX, based on your definition of "troll", merely insulting me DOES make you a troll. And I quote: "someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages. " Sorry, but you can't just concede your definition strictly because it negatively impacts you. Plus, that wasn't even a point of its own, however I'll make it one now. XStrikeX is a troll. He blatantly insults his opponent's for no reason, therefore his arguments should have no weight simply because matching his definition, he is only creating inflammatory, extraneous, and off-topic messages. Now to refute your points. 1. User Ark428 is trying to Troll. a) Your point on 'Merica is that I was trying to "irritate" Topiarey. However, I honestly didn't realize I had set it to a single round instead of two rounds. Topiarey is a friend of mine, so luckily he wasn't put off by this mistake. People make mistakes. They are not trolls because of it. b) Your argument against 'Merica Round 2 is truly ridiculous. "Debate is a method of interactive and representational argument. " Any argument that is interactive and representational is "debate", as was my debate against Topiarey, therefore it is not inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic considering this is a site strictly for debating. I was simply trying to argue a side that I don't personally agree with strictly for the purpose of debating. Your assumption that this is immediate trolling is ridiculously inflammatory. c) Your point on "People are stupid. " is again invalid for the same reason your argument against "'Merica" was. Again, Arch is a great friend of mine and was not put off by my mistake in this debate, selecting one round instead of two. I always wished to have a legitimate debate on that topic, and made a simple mistake. Mistakes do not = trolling. d) Thats great. Do you have any proof that "'Merica with another person" was trolling? No. e) If the burden of the proof was not met, then he simply fails to win the debate. If losing the debate makes you a troll, then that means that one person in every debate is a nasty, horrible Troll by my opponent's logic. Your conclusion is invalid because it relies on the validity of your contentions. NOW TO CLARIFY MY POINTS: 1. I am not a troll. Your definition basically dooms you. As you can see, all of your evidence comes from legitimate arguments, aka debates (Debate is a method of interactive and representational argument. ), therefore they are neither extraneous nor off-topic. The two you got me on were mistakes on my part, HOWEVER they are legitimate debates considering my opponent made an argument against my case, meaning that my actions in challenging my opponent fall under the definition of debate which is not extraneous nor off topic. I don't have to say anything else other than prove that I'm not a troll. My opponent has been rather vulgar and rude throughout this debate, insulting me time and time again. He has called me stupid, assumed that I'm a troll, and called me a lame wisecrack. This writing is clearly the actions of a troll. Should we acknowledge arguments from a man like this who uses "inflammatory, extraneous, and off-topic" arguments? No! Therefore, I am not a troll for all the reasons I have stated, and Aff IS for all the reasons I've stated.