Free Will is better than forced will

1. The fact that right and wrong are subjective negates my opponents resolution. This argument is not new and I made it in R2. This is a direct quotation of what I wrote: "This negates your entire argument because then from our perspective being forced to do the "right" thing wouldn't be better in our perception because we wouldn't be able to tell that we were doing better things in comparison due to our failure to comprehend what is right and what is wrong." Furthermore it does not further your resolution only negates it. 2. "Most people tend to not learn from their mistakes" Most people do because I said so. This is not an argument this is opinion. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conclusion: "My opponent has made 8 points in favor of his resolution. As my opponent made the resolution and as the resolution is a blanket statement, my opponent must defeat my logical syllogism or admit defeat. My opponent also has the burden of proof. For my opponents resolution to be correct, Forced Will must be better than forced will in all circumstances as my opponent never defined a specific circumstance. As it is clear: being forced to do bad things is not better than having the option to choose not to do them. Therefore his resolution is negated. However I will rebut his points below as well." I have negated all 8 points and ignored the ones that clearly had nothing to do with the resolution and were mainly incoherent. I have constructed a logical analogy that illustrates why forced will even when it's for your own good is worse than free will. Forced Will I would drive a fat person to a gym and they would be screaming along the way, crying, suffering and begging not to go. I would be laughing maniacally and shouting that it will make them healthier. I would put a gun to their head and tell them to lift weights or I would make them do it by force. As they slid into bed they would be sore and tired and would be miserable the next two weeks because their body would ache and they would suffer physically all the while dreading the next forced jog where I would tie them to the back of my car and make them run 10 miles. They would only be allowed to eat healthy foods. Free Will The fat person would be driving the car and would drive to McDonalds to get a burger and they would be happy and not suffering while they ate the burger. Down the line they might die earlier, but they wouldn't be sad because they happen to be a Mormon and would be going to heaven. Furthermore my opponent has completely ignored my argument regarding suffering: 1." If there was forced will by the "right people" there would not be any suffering." Disease, accidents, starvation, and depression would all exist. He simply states that God would remove suffering but does not say how or how a sinless world would remove disease accidents, starvation or depression. He just completely ignores this argument and says: "My opponent refuses to believe that a supreme being could stop sin. "If there is no sin, there would not be any suffering."" Conduct: My opponent has insulted me multiple times throughout the debate: My opponent expects me to respect him when he cusses out women in debate.org. How dare you tell me that I’ am offending you. Since he only made a small effort to make claims and to refute my claims, there are many. "My opponent is a true example on how there ought to be no hope for all humans to govern themselves effectively." " I think my opponent is against paying taxes because it is not something that he wants to do. He just thinks that everything just pays for itself and that he should not pay because he does not want to. I really hope there are not too many of your kind of people out there." "If everyone was like you, nothing would get done." "How can I not attack him. He has a big bull’s-eye that says hit me on it." "My opponent sounds like George W. Bush.Things are getting done; Mission Accomplished." My Opponent has also completely lied about what I said in order to ad hominem me: "My opponent says that he would rather be like the fat person hollering in the car because he doesn’t want to exercise." Memorable Quotes: "Global warming exists. War exists. There is no order." "We are losing control of the world. Caused by man."