911 WAS an inside job ..........

Sorry con I have been bust lately and dont have much time , i have an exam today. Nano sized particles can reduce the melting point of metals by a few hundred degrees according to your source . But nano sized particles would not have been produced by the fires or friction, but anyway the spheres were not nano sized but ranged in size from 0.001 mm to 1.5 mm in size. Lead for example vaporizes at 1750 c but a few hundred degrees less is still al ot higher temp than the official story Molybdenum melts at around 2700c so if it were reduced by a few hundred degrees somehow it is still far higher temperatures than given by the jet fuel. The composition is important as it gives clues to what was happening in the chemical reaction at the time .The spheres contain K, AL , SI , S a trademark signature of thermite as the metals react with each other they also melt with each other due to surface tension, random particles of other metals however wouldnt form in that way as there own surface tension would melt them and form spheres at different temperatures separate from each other. I meant FLY ASH 'like' materials btw, not literally fly ash. Anyway you claim theres only one molybdenum sphere and thats not enough to base an argument on .Unfortunately with only one sphere declassified . I dont know of any process which can produce spheres of molybdenum but you say there are millions ? Yet you also claim that because a experiment done by some JREFr which found one sphere of iron in their experiment that normal office fires could produce the billions of spheres found in the dust, 5.87 percent of the dust according to RJ lee report Its difficult for us to sit here an argue over these scientific details when its quite obvious that there needs to be more testing done with more samples of dust from the wtc . Independent scientists could either clear all this controversy up or alternatively prove 911 was an inside job. But the JREF people seem intent on debunking it on a forum . Why not ask for a new investigation ? With highly qualified scientists doing tests instead of arguing over it on forums etc. The spheres however can be produced by thermite./thermate as experiments have shown that thermite/thermate produces the identical spheres with identical chemical signature. The video i showed actually had multiple witnesses who witnessed molten steel, building 7 wasnt mentioned in the report either so why would they put molten metal in there too? NY times reported the molten steel was the biggest mystery of 911. 4360 kg of sulphur founds ? please source this info ?? Heat from aluminium as shown in videos clearly loses its heat instantly. NIST would use your explanation if it had any scientific merit. Unfortunately for debunkers maybe the iron spheres can be explained alternatively however the steel flowing from the south tower cannot. 1. maybe 2. what experiment? 3. even so i still think its impossible , its such a rare element its not just floating around 4.with the temperature yes. 5.the aluminium would be silvery in colour and not yellow/orange if it were flowing. 6. temp from black body radiation shows its steel or very high temperatures 7.firefighters were still trying to put our the fires in 2002 In conclusion I believe none of us are qualified to continue the scientific debate regarding the collapse, neither a the JREFrs. NIST lacks answers.All the evidence points to high temperatures . So i will stop trying to argue the science and bring out the big guns.Evidence we can all appreciate without knowing about science. video visual evidence of bombs etc. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... who do you beleive the govt? jref or see the truth with your own eyes !