Black Lives Matter, New Black Panthers, et al are more dangerous to the USA than ISIS

My Original Concerns1) The website cited is for the #BlackLivesMatter Organization, which is one organization within the greater black live matter movement. Numerous organizations take part in the movement, along with independent activists. Examples include Hands Up United, Organization for Black Struggle, the Green Party, Socialist Alternative, Outside Agitators, Anyonymous, etc. ect. Secondly "Black Liberation" is a social movement, not and ideology. The Pro clearly does not understand this and will grasp at straws on this issue.2) Black Lives Matter is built around specific concerns around police violence and systemic racism. It does not have an overal view of how the world should be organized, how the economy should be run or how the government should function and therefore is not a political ideology and is not affiliated with any political viewpoint. 3) I do not wish to remove the NBPP from this debate, merley to separate them from the Black Lives Matter movement, as the two are separate things that are not connected in anyway. I said they promote violence, but that does not mean they are a greater threat than ISIS.Responses to the Pros Arguments1) The fact that murders were committed by Black people does not in ANY WAY implicate Black Lives Matter, the New Black Panther Party or any other political movement, ideology or organization. Furtermore, those statistics are from 2012, before the Black Lives Matter movement really existed. This argument has no ground and is frankly ridicoulous. Unless all of the 4,203 in 2012 comitted by black people were some how related to a movement that hadn't even begun, then this argument should be completley disregarded.2) There are a number of problems with this argument. First, the sources. Brietbart is an openly conservative newsletter, with a clear agenda and has made it clear that it is opposed to the Black Lives Matter movement. Its behavior has been regarded by many as unethical and unjournalistic and has had a history of publishing blatantly flase, often unfounded, articles.http://www.bloomberg.com...http://mediamatters.org...http://articles.latimes.com...http://www.thedailybeast.com...The second article is from "US World Report", not to be confused with the well known and well sourced US News and World Report. This website is a crowd sourcig website and is therefore no more relibable than a blog. Furthermore the article used cites two other articles. One is from Brietbart, the other is from "US World Report". http://www.usworldreport.com...Both articles cited by the Pro are clear examples of cherry picking. Both articles cite just one activist involved in the Black Lives Matter movement, not the movement as a whole. The movement as a whole is Nonviolent. Black Lives Matter has repreatedly condemned violence agains police officers and violence as a whole.3) While the New Black Panthers protested with weapons outside a police department, they did not use said weapons and no one has ever been killed by the NBPP. There has never been an incident where the NBPP has acted on its violent rhetoric. https://www.splcenter.org...;4) That article did not mention looting, "shooting at cops" or burning down buildings, and was about why it was right to protest for justice in Ferguson. Said nothing about rioting.5) Taking over airport termnal is not a danger to the country. Hijacking a plane would be, but shutting down a terminal is not. Further more disruption does not equal violence.http://www.csmonitor.com...6) The first video cites the Brietbart Article that was cited the the "US World Report" which I have already addressed. Secondly, the daily stormer is a NEO-NAZI website. It is well known for that and is openly Neo-Nazi. http://www.nytimes.com...http://www.latimes.com... The Pro has no ground to stand on as his arguments use poor citations, incorrect analysis and cherry picked examplesFurthermore, the attacks in San Bernadino shows that Daesh poses a threat to the US. In total 14 people have been killed by Daesh inspired terrorists in the last month in the US. Throughout its existence 0 deaths have been linked to BLM or NBPP. Neither have killed anyone and therefore the risk is much less than posed by Daesh.