Roblox Is Better Than Minecraft (Pro: Roblox; Con: Minecraft)

Thanks for the reply, Con. You make a lot of good points, which is good news for me, you aren't biased like others. Appreciate that. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "'You can use resource packs higher than 16x16 (the original texture pack resolution per texture). For example, we could use Sphax PureBDCraft (linked below). It goes up to 512x512, thus making the game look way less blurry, and much higher quality.'" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://i.imgur.com... http://i.imgur.com... https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com... After reading your quote, I realized you made a good point, and checked out some resource packs. I specially looked at the cobble, including the ones I linked above. All of them are blurry, still. I also checked out the Sphax PureBDCraft texture pack, got this picture: http://static.planetminecraft.com... The cobble looks a lot better, thank you, but the cobble seems a little cartoonish in my opinion, and nonetheless, still doesn't compare to this in my mind: http://blog.roblox.com... Roblox's cobblestone has the appearance of looking 3D, even when it is really a flat surface, and looks a lot better, even if it is the default setting. You're kind of punching air in this aspect of the argument, and if you would have linked more sources to high-def looking cobblestone resource packs, it would've had a bigger impact. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '"You can do just the exact same thing with Spigot - it's both a client and a server, which allows the server to make plugins that interact with the player better than you would with Bukkit, the most commonly used server-hosting software. You also get more hooks, eg, pinpoint accuracy if a player's afk or not, is he messing with his inventory, is he looking around, etc. Even without Spigot - you can still make amazing plugins for minigames, just with Bukkit, and knowledge of coding."' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - What I was implying with the "Roblox offers them more arm space" comment was that Roblox gave you all the tools you need to build a good, efficient game. Your argument above makes it look like the creators of Minecraft locked you in a box with a few tools, having you to craft your own stuff to fully enjoy the game. I'm not sure if that makes you a "stronger community" or whatever, but to me it just looks like you guys must really love Minecraft to build all that plugin stuff for it. Moreover, Roblox has a plugins feature, and players make them - they help you with your game. So you already have the tools to make the game, then a few cool plugins to aid you. So we technically have plugins for your plugin. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '"Bukkit has an entire library full of plugins that people have already made and made public for you to use. A lot of them are very, very useful - like Essentials, which, essentially, adds essential commands to your server like /nick, /ban, /mute, etc."' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - We have something exactly like that that was made in 2008, before Minecraft was even released. Link is here: http://www.roblox.com... We have multiple other updated "admin commands" like this, with various commands, but I don't feel I need to punctuate this argument even further. I'm going to assume that these "plugins" are like normal scripts on Roblox, and move on. Argument #2: Community Minecraft players complain that Roblox is not free, yet the option to pay for a membership is completely optional, while to gain access to Minecraft, players must pay around thirty dollars. This comes across as very hypocritical, and out of pure spite. It just weakens the argument. I trust you won't do it, though (right?). Minecraft has a larger fanbase, to state the obvious. So, of course, when an argument like Roblox vs. Minecraft unfolds, there is going to be an outnumbered "army." That's most likely the reason that any post pertaining to defend Roblox, that wields any logic at all, is immediately debunked by Minecraft players in a most presupposition - based way. So which community has the worst players, Minecraft or Roblox? It's hard to say. Logically, any community is going to have some bad apples in it, whether you want them there or not. But Minecraft shows a broad example nonetheless. http://youtu.be... Watch this video. This dude, whoever he is, is "trolling" this girl who obviously has social anxiety, poor girl. The "trolling" comes out as harrasment, and the guy makes her so nervous, harassing her, neglecting the fact that he is unsettling her, and then posts the video on YouTube for likes and subscribers. And as of the time of this post, 10,907 have loved watching this girl get ridiculed. Luckily, some people in the comments have a heart. I even felt bad posting the link to the video, it's just bringing him more attention. But Roblox has its bad apples, too, I'm not going to be biased like most of the younger Minecraft community. We have people that will troll you, just not in such a way like on Minecraft. Most of the time, it is harmless things, such as going to a pizza place and asking for a taco or something, whatever. If anyone griefs your server, you can go into the logs and revert back to an old version of your game, so its good as new. That doesn't mean the community on Roblox isn't nearly as bad as Minecraft's. On an unrelated note to the argument, Roblox is like a breath of fresh air to me, honestly. Minecraft has just become clich" in my mind. On YouTube, playing Minecraft and uploading videos of them have become a horrendous clich" to me and many others. Nearly every popular commentator on YouTube has become famous for Minecraft videos - luckily there's some diamonds - in - the - rough channels that don't follow this dishonorable trend (this is in my eyes).