Hitler was influenced by Darwin's theory of evolution

Pro's CaseCon apparently is arguing that Hitler should have clearly spelled out that he was referring to Darwin's theory, by saying it in some exact terms that Con prefers. This doesn't need to be the case, so Con's arguments on this issue are not persuasive. The analogy is clearly using the principles of Darwinian evolution to describe the cultural evolution of man. Con argues that details of the analogy are wrong by Darwin standards, but that's irrelevant, such as his argument about inventions. It's the analogy that is important, whether Darwin talked about inventions, or not, is irrelevant. Con is arguing points within the analogy, and ignoring that Hitler was using an analogy of the theory of evolution to describe cultural evolution. I think he's simply misinterpreting or ignoring Hitler's meaning, thus missing the whole point. " Darwin's theory requires that all plants and animals struggle for existence. "Correct, and that is part of the analogy that Hitler is using. Con says that breeding is not part of evolution but that's silly. How can you possibly have biological evolution without breeding and reproduction? ?Racial ViewsWe understand what Darwin meant by races, but in the mind of a psycho like Hitler, race meant and applied to the differences within human beings. Anyone who wasn't white was deemed to be the inferior races, or varieties, that were doomed for failure, and harmed the gene pool of the superior race. Con's Case1. I'm not saying that Hitler never made statements about being a Christian, but he also made many statements against Christianity, and his hatred of it is evident in his Table Talks. .. "The reason why the ancient world was so pure, light, and serene was that it knew nothing of the two great scourges: the pox and Christianity. " Bottom line is that he was a liar and a politician, so it's difficult to verify his real religious beliefs. If he ever had religious beliefs, they were likely abandoned in favor of what was advantageous to the National Socialist State. Regardless though, as it relates to this debate, I've already shown that one can believe in God and also believe in evolution. Those 2 things are not mutually exclusive.2. Is con really questioning that Hitler was trying to cleanse the gene pool of what he viewed as undesirables? ?Darwin didn't need to refer to the Aryan race, and this is what I mean by con expecting things to be said in a certain way, and ignoring all implications if they aren't. Obviously Hitler saw the Aryans as the superior blood line that needed to be protected.3. Hitler wrote out an entire analogy between cultural evolution, in the same manner that biological evolution is claimed by Darwin, to have happened.4. Con is just simply denying any connection without good cause.5. Darwin does not mention those things, but he doesn't need to in order for a someone else to use his ideas to support those behaviors. In summary, I believe that I have upheld the resolution, and have shown that Darwin's evolution theory was an influence on Hitler and the Nazi regime. They drew upon evolutionary principles, and genetics, in developing their national policies.