Personality Vs Appearances in relationships

To start off my last speech, I would like to go ahead and and accept my opponents apology concerning his unfair advantage in the beginning of today's round. Con presented 5 claims and facts, im going to address them one at a time Claim: All organisms need to reproduce. Fact: If an organism did not reproduce it would be phase into extinction and would no longer be around Con is correct here, all organisms need to reproduce, and if they didn't, they would become extinct. Claim: An organism must contain the attributes required to reproduce. Fact: without these qualities, reproduction would be impossible Again, Con is correct there. Claim: Making the sex's more attracted to these qualities would promote successful reproduction Fact: If a sex is drawn to the other sex with good reproductive qualities, sexual reproduction will occur more often and be more successful Claim: Men are attracted to women with larger breasts and hips because it encourages reproduction Fact: Large breasts are ideal for feeding offspring and large hips are useful for child bearing (Im addressing both of these claims in one argument) this is where i say he is wrong. Con stated that Women with more attractive features such as bigger hips etc, can give birth more easily, that is a completely ridiculous argument. Every women, fat skinny, short tall, ugly pretty, ALL give birth the same way (except for personal reasons like not being able to give birth, health problems, etc...) Claim: Humans are attracted to each other because this attraction promotes reproduction Fact: All evidence stated above Con is completely focused on sex for this debate, and that is all his arguments are based on for this around, but in my beginning speech i gave the purpose of relationships, dating, etc.. Con admitted that he was basing his arguments on what he thought was true, with a little bit of Atheism in there. He has completely ignored this explanation, and thus that argument flows fully to the Affirmatives side, and my argument still stands. -My opponent said that evolution didn't need to be an actual theory, that it took part before that. This is where i say he is wrong. Because my opponent is an Atheist an i am a Christian, we have different views about this, but as i have stated before, evolution was not brought up until 1858, it did not existed before that. Yes, there were some (a VERY few amount) of people that were 'starting' to question God, but basically everyone believe in a creator.. and I'm going to state that the evolution theory is wrong, is was only brought up in 1858, and it was based off of what one man thought was true, there was (and still are) no evidence of this theory. The only explanation we get is "Over thousands of years..." but there is no proof of this. There is more proof that God exists than the theory of evolution. (but as i stated before, this is not a religion debate, if anyone would like to debate that with me, I'd be glad to do so another time.) What is "true love?" True Love is defined as- a sweetheart; a truly loving or loved person. Love is defined as- a feeling of warm personal attachment or deep affection, as for a parent, child, or friend. Love is the fondness one person has for another. It is not based off of looks, but hearts and personalities. let me give an example to make everything clearer- Your out looking for friends, because your all alone and you desire to have friends to talk to, to tell your problems too, who will encourage you and be there for you. (as most humans tend to feel that way) Your looking, and you have two options; You can be friends with that VERY attractive person over there who is selfish, greedy, and does not care about you at all. OR, you could be friends with that person who is not as attractive as the other one, but they care about you, want to listen to you, and they have a good heart. Friendship isn't measured by how attractive you are. That's the same with "True Love." You don't love someone to simply have sex with them... if so, that's not loving someone. if all life was, was reproducing and sex, then whats the point of life? there would be NO point! Relationships are God's special gift to us because as humans, even having all the love of God, we still crave human affection, so God made it so a couple could be bond together, and after that feel free to have kids, or whatever else they desire. There are thousands of people in the world who do not desire to have children, yet they want a relationship. Why? Because they desire True Love. I agree that sexual reproduction and childbirth contain that same hormone, but not true love. Definition of Reproduction- the act or process of reproducing. Definition of Reproduce- to produce one or more other individuals of (a given kind of organism) by some process of generation or propagation, sexual or asexual. here is a list of Synonyms for the word reproduce- clone copy duplicate emulate imitate mirror photocopy portray print recreate reflect repeat replicate reprint dupe echo engross follow manifold match mimeo mimeograph parallel photograph Photostat pirate reawaken recount redo reduplicate reenact relive remake represent revive stereotype transcribe type Xerox carbon do again As you can see, no where in that list is the word "Love" or "True Love" so my opponents statement that "reproduction and "true love" are merely two names given to the same thing" is false. As I have stated before, my opponent ignored my explanation of Relationships, and thus i should win simply because my side was based off of facts, and history. Since this is my last speech, I would like to apologize for dropping the last round, and i would like to thank everyone who took the time to read, and vote on this debate. Thank You all SO much! (source for definitions and Synonyms - Dictionary.com)