God is an absolute and complete being, and re-incarnation can not be ignored on a rational basis.

I will argue that God is an absolute complete being, Made of two energies, 1 mutable material energy, and 2 eternal spiritual energy, using my built up opinion from memory of Vedic philosophy, I also can offer some scientific arguments to back up my claims. This is my fist debate here, and I hope my opponent can appreciate that I am a beginner at this style of debate, and may not portray my argument in the finesse and style I have witnessed from other participants in this forum. Never the less, apart from my style of and grammar skills, I believe I can deliver a good argument in favour of God being an absolute complete being, and that re-incarnation should be given more in-depth consideration. With that all said and done, I welcome a formidable foe. :) And hope the adversary will be appreciated on both sides. :) I will begin by Giving a defining of God, as a being with infinite attributes, an Absolute Being,( Absolute means no separation, ) so actually everything that exists, in material and spiritual form, is not separate from God, but rather instead is an actual expansion or emanation of God's divine energy, In understanding the aspect of material nature, i.e. The universe, or for a better term, The Material Cosmic Manifestation. God is inconceivably one and different with Himself and creation. (Please try and grasp this ) I offer an analogy of the sun and the sunshine to further understand how I propose to suggest, that something can be, Inconceivably, one and different. The sun and the sunshine, both have the same qualities, but are both different in quantity, The sun is situated mighty in one place, yet the sunshine is able to be every where simultaneously, Both are perceived differently, yet both share the same qualities. Just like if the sun were to enter my window, I would be foolish to say the sunshine has entered my window. This example is given to further understand how God is able to simultaneously be one and different, with his creation as an absolute being. I will further try to portray a belief for the after life and an appeal to re-incarnation to be considered as plausible in the least. Firstly, I refer to Dr Ian Stevenson, who dedicated his life to the subject and conducted research of some 3000 cases of re- incarnation, mostly including small children who claim to still remember and have knowledge a previous life. Ian Pretyman Stevenson, MD, (October 31, 1918"February 8, 2007) was a Canadian biochemist and professor of psychiatry. Until his retirement in 2002, he was head of the Division of Perceptual Studies at the University of Virginia School of Medicine, which investigates the paranormal. http://en.wikipedia.org... Further I would like to state a remark by a well loved scientist, astronomer and skeptic, Dr Carl Sagan, Who wrote in his book, The Demon Haunted World. ""there are three claims in the ESP field which, in my opinion, deserve serious study: (3) that young children sometimes report the details of a previous life, which upon checking turn out to be accurate and which they could not have known about in any other way than reincarnation" -Carl Sagan, The Demon Haunted World, 1995. Sagan was a healthy skeptic and added in the same book: "I pick these claims not because I think they"re likely to be valid (I don"t), but as examples of contentions that might be true." They "have at least some, although still dubious, experimental support. Of course, I could be wrong." This is the approach that is needed, without the scoffing and the quick, judgmental pronouncements. I hope I have given enough information to receive a decent a fair rebuttal, please bear in mind this is my first time debating on the format of this forum, and any indication's as to how I could improve this, and correction is most welcome. I now hand over this debate to an opponent. Many Thanks.