Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II should become a graffiti artist.

Con says: I see no practical purpose of Queen Elizabeth II of becoming a graffiti artist. The only real reason I would see her becoming a graffiti artist would have to be entertainment. The world has enough entertainment, leaving little to no need for the Queen to be in the entertainment industry. To appeal to young whipper snappers, obviously. If she doesn't, then she will just sort of be forgotten and all the exciting and hip people (who I hate) will be remembered instead. The queen needs to be remembered to keep the old folks happy. Con says: It is doubtful that the Queen would engage in such activities. The Royal Family has been known to conduct themselves with dignity, discouraging anyone from the thought of her becoming a graffiti artist. Graffiti is a disrespectful act, and is not for anyone with any kind of self-respect. Since she is told to have respect, she should not become a graffiti artist. Yes, but the gangsters like danger. Also, graffiti artists are cool and London is one of the most pro-graffiti cities in the world [15]. There are even websites where these chavs hang out. I have an account on a graffiti forum called 'bombingscience' [16]. Con says: Saying that the Queen is incapable of getting in trouble is completely wrong. The Queen is simply a figurehead in the British government, so she does not control any decisions. All government activity is conducted by the Parliament. So if indeed Queen Elizabeth II did become a graffiti artist, she would not be above laws. Con appears to be a bit of an ignoramus when it comes to life in Britain. Ask any English debater (Ed) and they'll tell you that the queen can do whatever she likes. Con says: The next statement I am addressing is in the matter of the Queen having a good sense of humor. This statement is purely biased, and is not valid. Debates should use known facts, not speculations by few who think alike. Nope [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. Con says: You cannot call free human beings servants. I know for a fact that anyone who works for her is indeed free, since slavery is no longer legal in civil countries. I also find the reference to Officers of the Law being pigs very offensive. The Queen is different though, she is above the law. Con says: You can't claim that the Queen has reign over the Palace. She does not own the Palace, therefore she can't deface the Palace with cans of spray paint. Again with the "Pig" reference. The Queen is special like that. She can do all sorts of neat tricks, like get a ton of people to turn up at her anniversary [9] [10]. Also, it wouldn't be defacing. A room is not defaced if you simply keep your inventory in it. Also, the Queen is above the law [11] [12] [13] [14]. I thank you. Sources[1] . http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk...[2] . http://www.dailymail.co.uk...[3] . http://www.dailymail.co.uk...[4] . http://www.telegraph.co.uk...[5] . http://www.channel4.com...[6] . http://www.people.com...[7] . http://www.independent.co.uk...[8] . http://www.malaysiakini.com...[9] . http://www.bbc.co.uk...[10] . http://www.youtube.com...;(the video)[11] . http://uk.answers.yahoo.com...;[12] . http://www.royalwarrant.org...[13] . http://www.law4u.com.au...[14] . http://abovethelaw.com...[15] . http://en.wikipedia.org...[16] . http://www.bombingscience.com...