The existence of god

I will do the same (top to bottom) Yes, I do agree that some terms can be ambiguous in a conversation where they aren't exactly defined, but that is not the case here. I will use your analogy to disprove you. Let me make a hypothetical situation. Let's say that there is a tennis match and a pair of salt and pepper shakers right next to each other. Yes, the word set can be ambiguous, like if I said, "That is a set." You would have no way of knowing if I were talking about tennis or the pair of salt and pepper shakers unless you saw what I was pointing at. (For the sake of the argument let's say you can't see what I'm pointing at.) Now if before I say "That is a set" I define how I am going to use the word "set" as being a pair of something then you know I am talking directly about the salt and pepper shakers and not the tennis match. Therefore in looking at the context of my argument you cannot say that a term I am using is ambiguous because I have clearly defined how I am using it in my argument. With that being said, when I use the term "possible world" look to my definition to see how I am using it in the argument. Your second paragraph barely makes any sense. You cannot just SAY I am wrong and expect people to believe you. You have to prove I am wrong with logic and on that front you have failed. I, however, have proven you wrong with logic and reasoning. That is how I come to the conclusions that you are wrong. Not just because I say it. I can possibly see where you might think that he sounds full of himself but that does not prove him wrong. Not does him having to take time to make another video prove him wrong. I, in fact, have proven your 5 steps wrong in the very logic that since your first step does not work therefore none of your steps work. Now set aside the fact that I don't believe in the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, if he has all the qualities that would make him a MGB then he would be God (because that is how God is defined). So if the FSM is a MGB (i.e. God) then yes those terms would work, hence the logical conclusion (which you yourself have also come to when you said "Stick him into your 5 points and BOOM! -He is a maximally great being -The logic is the same") God does exist. (Again, I am not here to refute the Church of the FSM. I am here to prove the existence of a God with logic and reasoning.) To add: "Pastafarianism is a real religion" http://www.venganza.org... People do think The Flying Spaghetti Monster is a real God. As for the video you posted to me about religion and suffering. The person who made the video is trying to simplify something that has to many variables. And you want to talk about people who seem "full of himself"? The person who made the video seems to think that Atheists are the reason that economies grow and stay stimulated. You cannot forget all of the other variables that go into making a third world country (such as war, genocide, infertile soil, no natural resources, and many others.) if you wanted to go so far as to say that religion causes third world countries then why not say it's because of dictatorships and islam? they are very prominent in those countries as well. They could be causing it. With having said that, the video is poorly made. You can't simplify something like that with so many variables. Thank you. I look forward to your closing argument.