Probable existence of a natural God

The only part that I would ask that we not debate is the omnibenevolence and personal nature of his character, I don't want to imply that BECAUSE he exists that he must definitely love you and me and everyone else. That's untrue and everybody knows that haha. I hope this doesn't damage your argument, but this is what I wanted to follow from the fourth point in my first round list of bulleted rules. That being said I would like to thank Con for this chance to argue, as this subject lies a bit closely to anyone's heart who is like me who grew up in a religious home and has now become an agnostic or new atheist. If we look at the arguments that popular New Atheists such as Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris have provided that disprove the existence of a God figure we will find that it really boils down to one core issue. If there were to be a God that existed in accordance with the currently known functions of the universe that it would be highly improbable and for the most part impossible. They claim to be fairly certain of this for a few reasons. As humans we are extremely complex beings who came to be through evolution, to postulate a God's existence simply because we do not know what caused the first cause is would mean that an even more complex being would have had to been the prime mover and designer of the universe. The idea of intelligent design is simply an illusion. Clearly there are many biological and cosmological functions that serve no divine purpose and in truth are not designed intelligent, that is to say they aren't designed well. Any God who works through an institution that creates so much strife in the world or allows this pain and entropy to exist clearly is not who it's disciples claim it to be. Any argument for God is a Godofthegaps argument, or rather arguing from ignorance. God is a lazy and improbable answer for a fundamental question. Basically, God is an answer, it's just not a very smart one. For the most part I concede most of these points, but I disagree in the most vital area. The point of my argument will be this, at this point in time it has become a greater than or equal to rational decision to believe in a God who lives within the boundaries of Science. For the most part these arguments have already been hashed out by atheists and theists, however I believe most theists fail to connect the dots because of their need to implicate such a complex God. This is where my story will come into play.Let's imagine ourselves one billion years into the future. Humanity has solved almost ALL of it's problems. There is no more hunger, violence, tyranny, malady, or suffering. Over the past billion years we as humans have evolved quite efficiently. Our bodies are much more resilient and we live to be over 200 years old naturally, however most of us have nanotechnology implanted at birth that makes us effectively immortal. In this world the technology is so advanced that if it were shown to a human of our time that it would be indistinguishable from magic or miracle. There is however one fall back of this universal happiness. As the human race sits at the top of the universe having accomplished all of their goals, achieved all of their dreams, cured all of their maladies, they begin to grow restless. As we know it's much harder to do nothing than it is to do something. If there is nothing that humans can possibly do more in order to improve their own well being and the well being of their environment than what else is there to possibly do? Humans have mastered the elements, the atoms, the particles, the Higgs Bosons and the future unknown particles that are yet to be found. I can certainly tell you what I would do. I would play God. Without a doubt in my mind I can say that in a existence one billion years from now it is highly likely that all of humanity's problems will no longer exist. Yes, there are forms of entertainment yet unforeseeable that are to be had in this future, but nothing could possibly be more fulfilling than creating, watching, and enjoying the scramble of a baby race to come to maturity as it struggles with it's identity, it's maladies, and it's nature. Utilizing their expansive knowledge and abilities this futuristic human race gives birth to a new universe in a new dimension that is separate from their own. From knowledge of their own universe they create a Big Bang and seemingly create something out of nothing. They watch as the stars from, the planets coalesce, and the galaxies are born. Eventually a race not completely unlike our own, now ancient, forms on a planet with conditions not too unlike ours has come about through evolution. They examine their surroundings and slowly develop technology that cures their sufferings, that ends hunger, that ensures world peace, that ends crime. Over a billion years now they have gained power over their natural surroundings. The cycle begins again, and they play God by setting a new universe into motion in a new dimension. Throughout that whole time though the previous God race has been watching. Very rarely interfering, sometimes playing cruel jokes like creating tragedy or placing seemingly divine scripture into society. They don't correct evolutionary mistakes because it's unnecessary. They do this to help their new race come to maturity, because improvement can't be had if there is nothing to improve upon. These rare interferences are done with such advanced technology that it is indistinguishable from magic by the baby race and they entertain the idea of Gods similar to the ones we have seen in the past and today. If multiple Gods this accounts for the wildly varying religions we have seen. This answers my own personal question of if not one religion why not all religions? We know that it is very possible that there are separate dimensions. We do not know what the state of these dimensions are, that is to say we don't know how far or how little the universe has unfolded in each of these dimensions. If they are infinite it is not inconceivable that there is a race advanced enough to control the natural laws. We also know that if you advanced technology enough it would be indistinguishable from magic for the uninformed user. Any one who was shown a microwave 1000 years ago would have claimed us to be sorcerers or magicians. Human nature is to create and improve. Families create babies. Politicians create legislation, that is aimed at improving the quality of life but is often impeded by stupidity or corruptness. Scientists advance technology. Doctors improve health. Artists create beauty. God creates man. or Advanced more intelligent man creates something similar to man. I'm saying here that the human experience does not have to be unique in the fact that we are the first and the last intelligent race to exist. Rather than explaining our existence by stating that something came out of nothing, or that DNA just exists, or that particles just appeared and started moving, or that we don't really know but we do know it had a beginning, wouldn't it make the most rational sense to say that a God or God-like people set our universe into motion, watched as it unfolded, and just enjoyed doing it. There is no need to say that these Gods communicate with us and care about us and love us all. It's perhaps very conceivable that we are just a "play toy" to God and that it doesn't actually matter if we are happy. This answer isn't comforting, but it's not supposed to be. We don't need a personal god. God could have even made us by accident and not care about or know about our existence, but this does not change the validity of this option. We don't have to find God by looking into the past. We can look into the future and see it in ourselves. We have the potential to be God. If it's possible that intelligence existed before us then why could it not have achieved what we might achieve? For these reasons, God is an answer, and it is a smart one.