9/11 was NOT a hoax or conspiracy.

first of all, i would like to know where you're getting any of your information from, since you list only two links, one of which is a photo and the other only about the pentagon attack. your first rebuttal: the manager of wtc construction, frank a. demartini, stated that "the building probably could sustain MULTIPLE impacts of jetliners." i posted this previous quote[summarized] before and you did not prove it to be wrong. "the twin towers came down at nearly free fall speed. 200 thousand tons of steel shatters and explodes outwards over 500 feet." "this means that floors shattered at an average rate of about ten floors per second." "there is no scenario of a pancake effect of buildings falling that allows them to fall at the rate of free fall.you said "...the problem that caused the collapse was not that the main structural elements failed." look at this picture: http://www.rense.com... as i said before, this is how experts would have cut columns in a demolition. you did not refute this claim. your second rebuttal: now you're going against what an experienced doctor has said and concluded. not be offensive, but i would trust a trained doctor over a civilian when talking about the materials that make up bombs and interpreting them. your third rebuttal: "although we are told that four or five of the alleged hijackers were on each of the flights, [the soul?] of their names should have been on the flight manifest." (abdulaziz al-omari)"i couldn't believe it when the FBI put my name on their list. they gave my name and my date of birth, but i am not a suicide bomber. i am here. i am alive. i have no idea how to fly a plane"[the telegraph, 9/23/2001] "at least 6 of the "hijackers" are still alive." "the FBI has to this day not revised their list." your fourth rebuttal: i agree that this is possible, but highly improbable. by the time the fuel tanks had exploded, the plane would have been buried into the building, because that is what caused the explosion, the collision. and the cockpit module would have been propelled into the building, not out. your fifth rebuttal: bin laden did not finance the attacks. "no inquiry was ever made as to why general ahmad[ISI()]ordered $100k to be sent to mohamed atta." "the 911 commission deemed the financing of the attacks "of LITTLE significance" in their official report." (Greg Palest and David Paltister-Guardian, Wed. november 7, 2001)"FBI and military intelligence officials in washington say they were prevented for POLITICAL REASONS from carrying out full investigations into members of the Bin Laden family in the US before the terrorist attacks of september 11." "January 2001-The bush administration orders the FBI and intelligence agencies to "back off" investigations involving the bin Laden family, including two of Osama bin Laden's relatives(abdullah and omar) who were living in falls church, VA - right next to CIA headquarters." your sixth rebuttal: first of all, because he had "poor reviews" then why did he get his license? you can either fly safely or you can't fly at all. there is or should not be a minimally acceptable pilot. second, he was considered a poor pilot. a well trained pilot could commit that kind of a maneuver, but not one that was considered poor. "He didn't care about the fact that he couldn't get through the course"[AZ flight school employee][New York Times 5/4/02] "I'm am still amazed that he could have flown into the pentagon...he could not fly at all." so how did he get his license again? your seventh rebuttal: "no seats, no luggage, no bodies. nothing but bricks and limestone."[zeitgeist] "the official explanation is that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane. Flight 77 had two rolls royce engines made of steel and titanium alloy and weigh six tons each. it is scientifically impossible for twelve tons of steel and titanium was vaporized by jet fuel." "we were also told that the bodies were able to be identified either by their fingerprints or their DNA. so what kind of fire can vaporized aluminum and tempered steel and yet leave human bodies intact?" "shortly after the strike, government agents picked up debris and carried it off." "the entire lawn was covered with dirt and gravel, so that any remaining forensic evidence was literally covered up." "over 80 video recordings of the pentagon strike are currently being withheld by the FBI." your eighth rebuttal: "it looks like there's nothing there but a hole in the ground." "it looked like somebody just dropped a bunch of metal out of the sky." "it looked like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped trash into it."[Wally Miller, somerset county coroner. "there was nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there." in the film, they compared a commercial flight crash in nigeria to the flight 93 crash. while the nigerian flight crash had a seat visible, scrap metal lying all around, flight 93 had barely any debris. to see the picture comparison, go to 48 minutes, 36 seconds. I would like for you to explain to me, that if all of this was caused solely by hijackers, what happened with NORAD[north american aerospace defense command]. "according to standard operating procedure, if an FAA flight controller notices anything that suggests a possible hijacking, the controller is to contact a superior. if the problem cannot be fixed within about a minute, the superior [should ask?] NORAD...to setup or scramble jet fighters to find out what is going on...although interceptions occur in ten or so minutes, in this case, 80 or so minutes had elapsed before the fighters were even airborne." also, "when bush and cheney met with the 911 commission, they did so only on their own terms: -they appeared together -they were NOT under oath -no press or family members were allowed to attend -no recording of any kind was allowed -no transcript was allowed" also, "there is literally nothing in the 9/11 report that the bush administration did not approve of." wouldn't you consider this at least suspicious? also, "nearly all terror suspects are released without charges...but thats after they make it to the front page for you to see." also, "look at the terrorist acts that have occurred...the CIA behind most if not all of them." "the FBI actually carried out the attack on the world trade center in 1993." in london-(interviewer)"you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?" (interviewee)"precisely." also, "at least 12 countries warned the US regarding intelligence about an eminent attack on america." so, my final question is that: are you directly challenging the correctness/authenticity of the quotations or information in the film zeitgeist? because if you are, i need you to give me some reason to think that the sources' claims, that you disagree with, listed at the very end of the film, are somehow incorrect.