The christian god does not exist

The Bible is accurate and reliable to show gods existance. The bible is not accurate ad reliable to show gods existence. My opponent argues that because the bible made succesful predictions that it shows god exists. "Also almost all of the bible prophesies has been fulfilled. I cannot list all of them but I will list a few"The bible also has many false claims and predictions. Here are a list of failed prophecies.Isaiah 17:1 "An oracle concerning Damascus: See, Damascus will no longer be a city but will become a heap of ruins."FAIL: Damascus is still inhabited today with well over a million people and there was never a time where it ceased to be a city. It is widely known as being the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world. Ezekiel 29:10-11 "therefore I am against you and against your streams, and I will make the land of Egypt a ruin and a desolate waste from Migdol to Aswan, as far as the border of Cush. The foot of neither man nor beast will pass through it; no one will live there for forty years."FAIL: Never in its long history has Egypt been uninhabited for forty years. Matthew 16:28 "I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom." 23:36 "I tell you the truth, all this will come upon this generation." 24:34 "I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened." FAIL: Jesus states in Matthew that all the signs marking the end of the world would be fulfilled before his generation ended, before the people that were standing infront of him "taste death." Those people have been dead for over 2000 years and the world did not come to an end, neither have all those signs been fulfilled. Here is the link to these failed prophecies and more http://truth-saves.com...The bible also makes false historical claims. For exampleJericho The Bible says Joshua destroyed the wall of Jericho around 1400 BCE but Archaeological evidence shows that an earthquake destroyed the wall in 2300 BCE. The city was also thoroughly destroyed by a fire and then abandoned in 1600 BCE. Jericho was not inhabited again until 700 BCE. There was no wall to tumble down or citizens to destroy at Jericho within centuries of when the Bible says Joshua was there. http://truth-saves.com... the link and moreThe bible also claims that the earth is about 6000 years old. When scientific evidence puts it around 4.5 billion years old.http://www.missiontoamerica.com...www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.htmlThere are countless other contradictions, falsehoods, ect. in the bible but these should be sufficient for now.This shows that the bible is not accurate in making predictions and explaining things on account of it is often wrong. However, even if the bible is sometimes right, this is no reason to think that it is right about accuratly describing god. I have a friend who predicted the winner of the NCAA march madness tournament for the last 3 years, this does mean he can describe supernatural phenomena accuratly. Nostradomas made many correct predictions, one should not take is word if he described a god/religion. There is little correlation between correct predictions and the ability to desribe god.The bible is the best book of all the documented religionsEven if the bible was the "best" of all documented religions it does not prove that it is reliable. Saying that the bible is the best book to reliably desribe the universe is like saying that wrigleys is the best kind of gum to chew to survive getting ran over by a train. Even if it is the best it is not effective.In addition, there are more conceivable religions then just documented ones. God allows evil on account of adam and eveMy opponent claims that God is allowing satan to run the world and is preparing evidence for a trial"God took the chance to allow Satan to rule this world, and explain why he should have sovereignty over god.Eventually he will be put on trail and all this evidence of suffering will be on the table"This is not the action of an all knowing all powerful good being. Imagine if Barrack Obama allowed Osama bin Laden to rule the USA to prove it he would do a bad job. Also, an all powerful being would not take so long to get a trial. Why is a trial necesarry? Who does he has to prove to that satan is not fit to rule? If god is so concerned about having enough "evidence" why does he give slim evidence of his existence? Why is it more important to show that satan cannot rule than to prevent the suffering of the world. Some guy steals an apple, so god decides to subject the entire world to mass amounts of suffering. This seems a bit harsh. My opponent states that allowing suffering is punishment for adam. "What happens when a father simply overlooks deliberate wrongdoing on the part of his children rather than take firm disciplinary measures? It is immoral to punish others for the deeds of one man. For an example in North Korea children born in prisons/gulags/workcamps are prisoners for life. This is immoral. An all good god would not punish others for the deeds of another. Also my opponents states that god does not cause suffering. "So first God allows suffering, not causes it".According to noahs ark god deliberetly drowned everyone. http://christianity.about.com...God is invisible he does not existGravity can easily be noticed. God cannot. THe evidence for god is a book that includes falsohoods and contradictions. My opponent claims that god wants people to know abot him. "If god cared about humans he would want us to know about him." Absolutely right." Well, if god was all powerful he could do a better job of this. Not everyone knows about god. There are tribes that have not made contact with modern society yet, that do not know about this God. If god wanted these people to know about him, and was all powerful, then they would know about him. They do not know about him, so god must not be all powerfull and all knowing. B-3 the Christian god exists because of the definition of existence.First notice a contradiction made by my opponent. "Maybe we have seen him but cannot perceive him." "If we can perceive something. Than it is a thing and it exists."My opponent thinks that god exists on account of he exists in our mind. "Than it is a thing and it exists. So at a basic level here. the fact that we are talking about the Christian god in this technical way of thinking means he exists atleast in our mind. Even if in the mind it is still existence."If this were the case, then all other gods would also exist. The hindu god/voodoo gods/ect because they also are percieved. Since the Christiian God is the one and only god, then it cannot exist alongside other gods. So god cannot exist.Also if this would be the case then, delusions of the mentally ill would exist because they exist in the mind. The lost city of Atlantis exists because it exists in ones mind. Imaginary friends would exist. Santa Clause and the Easterbunny would exist because they exist on ones mind. Ghosts. dragons, faireis and other nonsense would also exist.My opponent states "Whatever the human brain perceives in life is its own reality.". Anorexic people perceive themselves as fat, when they actually skinny. Some morons percieve themselves as smart when they are actually stupid. Just because somebody percieves something does not make it true.At best my opponent has succesfully proven that God is no more real than Santa ClauseI have shown that the bible is not sufficient evidence to believe in godadam and eve do not explain the problem of evil God is morally obligated to produce a convincing case he exists to everyone and he fails to do soand that if somebody thinks of something in their mind it does not exist in reality