It is possible to romantically love more than one person at the same time.

I agree with your statement on love because this is a depfeiniton that justifies the feelings one gets while in love. I agree with your statement for a relationship being built on love but not on devotion and attachment. A monogamous relationship is the only kind that can give attachment and devotion to a person. I agree with this statement yet this statement is irrelevant towards how loving two people at the same time is irrelevant. I agree with this statement because it serves as a right of passage in getting into a relationship. I agree with the statement that sexual attraction is included in romantic relationships but this does not give reason as to how it is possible in romantically loving two people at the same time. I agree with this statement that if that no one is bound to a specific person through their life. I disagree with this statement because no one is asking the woman if they would want to adapt such a lifestyle of entrapment. They are confided to one person specifically which contradicts your statement on premise 6. Polygamy can not be true love because it's more of an arrangement, business deal, obligation, etc. the husband will not treat all his wives equally for the reasons being stared in round 2 and 3. I disagree with this being a reasonable argument as to how someone can romantically love two people at once this has nothing to do with a relationship in general. This is simply a definition of infidelity not a argument to justify infidelity with loving two people at once. I disagree with this statement. Cheating does not justify sleeping with another woman and suddenly claiming you did it by mistake but if it is done more than once it is because you love your mistress as well. Loving two people at once is just an excuse to have sexual encounters with whoever you reach a desire for. I disagree with this statement. A nymphomaniac would not ever put themselves in a situation where they would have to settle down with someone. They are incapable of being confined and are incapable of loving they only love having sex. This is addiction that occurs during the early years of being introduced to sexual activities not twenty years of being married to your high school sweetheart. People getting attached to their lover is a why I is impossible to Los two people at once because humans crave attachment. This goes back to premise 2 justifying how attachment is only available to monogamous relationships not to people who pretend to love two other people at the same time. I disagree with this statement. A girl especially a girl, would only have true feelings of love towards on man. A best friend since childhood does not constitute as a reason to love them too it is more of a platonic love rather than a romantic love. Therefore, it is impossible to love two people romantically at the same time. My opponent has tried to use the concept of Polygamy or long endearing friendships alongside relationship to justify romantically loving two people at once but has been unsuccessful in supplying other valid examples. Premise 2 reinstated the definition of love provided in premise 1 but true to use devotion and attachment as a following act of love but that is only in a monogamous relationship ship as I reinstated in premise 12. Premise 9 and 10 also were only definitions and example of the word infidelity. Infidelity does not occur to them steer into the way of a man having an excuses to claim he loves his mistress as well. He has simply ran out of sexual tendency towards his wife but still values the interest they share but obviously does not take into account respecting her or else he would have not cheated. Another option they could of had was going to see a sex therapist but that is besides the point. Thus, my opponent has not been able to prove with resources and actual evidence how it is possible to romantically love two people at the same time. Using only one example of a religious does not give enough support to the argument because even in that there is no evidence the man love all his wives equally .