Women wrestling are better than men stitching

Dang! Yup. Things just got serious. First off, I'd to point out something extremely important: I am a MALE. My opponent called me a "she..." :( Although I am angered by my opponent's words, I still want to point out that her profile picture looks awesome! (Not serious anymore...)LOL. Now moving on..."I am a woman too. I do a ton of physical activities (sports). But I am thirteen. I have not fully grown in my physical body futures!!! I play every sport (basketball, softball/baseball, tennis, volleyball, soccer) except wrestling (and boxing and Lecross). Main reason is because I don't want to hurt anything. Sure, you get hurt playing basketball, but the goal of the game is not to tear someone to the ground. I'd like to mention that Pro is 14 according to his profile, she should know what I mean. Secondly I'd like to make it known that women wrestling is considered awful, even by pro people on a wrestling forum. Read what they say here: [1] Too physical means awkwardly weird and the sport is generally (and obviously) uncomfortable for everyone, the spectators and the players! [2], [3]"The goal of wrestling is not "tearing someone the ground." Like football, it is merely a sport. All sports have objectives, and wrestling happens to have a different goal. You must simply take down your opponent in order to "win." My opponent’s claim about how wrestling is unsafe is a myth. Wrestling is safe. Illegal moves and potentially dangerous situations can result in penalty points and even disqualification. Coaches and referees work very hard to keep wrestling SAFE for all participants. [2] Wrestling is actually quite similar to karate and other types of martial arts. I know countless girls who do martial arts. Karate and wrestling both have the same objectives (take down your opponent using different moves), but I don't understand why my opponent considers wrestling as an awful sport.I'd like to remind my opponent that the wrestling "pros" that you mentioned were not legit professionals. They happen to be people who just post a lot of comments in the forum. I checked the presumed professional’s profile… His occupation was educator. I want to remind my opponent that she should have thoroughly research about the “pro” before using him as a source. I also want to point out that people have different opinions! Some females might actually enjoy playing or spectating wrestling. You mentioned that EVERYONE generally feels uncomfortable about wrestling. This is a mere claim, and it is invalid until she proves it with a reliable source (the two “sources” were pictures)."YouTubers say nothing on the scale of popularity. Admit it, whenever you watch a video you are either bored or have to do it for education (school). A YouTube video has no say in this debate because it doesn't prove that women wrestling is entertaining, in fact if anything, it proves against your proposition. It is lame and not useful in any way."First off all, the video doesn't prove how wrestling "is lame and not useful in any way." This is merely your opinion. Second, I only brought that video up just to show how Women Wrestling is starting to become popular. 17 million views are A LOT of views. Not all people go to Youtube, just because they are bored. Some of them watch it because of interest. The “disturbing” (3rd) picture that you brought up, in fact, proves my claim. If you take a look at the crowd behind them, you would notice that there is a lot of people. Your picture proves its popularity.“I doubt that. As you said, women have already started wrestling, but it is most definitely not the same as men's wrestling. There are better sports that could teach self defense, but wrestling would not do that well. Women should take Karate or something, instead!”You have no experience in wrestling. How do you know it wouldn’t be the same as men’s wrestling? My brother used to wrestle, back when he was a sophomore. There were a couple of females in his wrestling team. He claims that women were just as good as men at wrestling. My opponent is just bringing up faulty assumptions and opinions.Also, I’d like to point out that wrestling helps in self-defense. Wrestling teaches the basic skill about how to PROTECT YOURSELF on the event of a physical altercation [1] (This source is actually credible, unlike my opponent’s sources):-Body Positioning-How to Control an Opponent-How to Defend Against Different Types of Attacks -ToughnessActually, many credible sources (related to sports) support my claim about why wrestling is good. Wrestling provides a positive outlet for especially energetic boys and GIRLS. [2] “Men sewing would calm them down, help them stop and think about morality, and from the way you put it, could stop sexual abuse.”I’m sure rapists would stop their actions and start sewing (sarcasm intended)! You suggestion cannot be upheld. It’s not going to work. I guarantee that sexual abuse would still occur. If women were taught how to wrestle, they would be able to “defend against different types of attacks.” Isn’t it common sense? According to you, wrestlers learn how to “tear someone to the ground.”“Oh and by the way I am a female. What you just said is an utterly incorrect assumed proposition. But you contradict yourself by suggesting that women ARE as strong as men. If you believe this, then what is the use of wrestling? Compared to men stitching, it is a waste of time.”Well, here is what I said:"I also feel that the whole "men are stronger than women" thing is quite unfair. Once women start wrestling, they would be just as physically strong as men."Please DO take a look at my second sentence. “ONCE WOMEN START WRESTLING, they would be JUST AS PHYSICALLY STRONG AS MEN.” I’m not contradicting myself. I meant that once women start wrestling, they would be just as strong. Once they are just as strong, “men are stronger than women” thing would be over.Also, my opponent brings up a claim about how wrestling is waste of time, compared to men stitching. This “argument” included no argument, explanation, of source. Although it shouldn’t be considered an argument, I shall refute it anyways. Men stitching would actually be a waste of time. First of all, men who stitch wouldn’t be able to earn a lot of money. Even if they earn a couple of dollars from selling their products, they would have to use up all of their money that they earned on resources, needed for sewing. Wrestlers, on the other hand, would clearly earn more money because spectators pay to watch them wrestle. Second, watching wrestling would be entertaining than men sewing. My opponent admitted than women wrestling is more entertaining. Watching someone sew is clearly a waste of time.“Earlier, you made an assumed proposition that went something like this:A) Women are sexually abused.B) Women will be more able to defend if they learn to wrestle.C) Therefore, if women learn to wrestle they won't be sexually abused as much.Voters, you can decide if this works.”It makes complete sense. Currently, sexual abuse is a big problem worldwide. Like I mentioned, women would be able to defend themselves through wrestling. Because they are capable of defending themselves, less rapes would occur. Hey! Since, you brought that up, I just remembered something. Earlier, you made an assumed proposition that went something like this: A) No reason given. B) No reason given. C) Thus, wrestling is lame and not useful in any way. Assumed Proposition #2 A) Wrestling gives females in a better position in money. B) People watch the lame performance (opinion), and lose money. C) Thus, wrestling is dumb. Voters, you can decide if it works. (LOL) RFD: Let’s keep it simple. 1.) All of my opponent’s “arguments” are mere assumptions and opinions. 2.) My opponent never brought up any credible sources… Sources can be found in comments. Vote Pro. *My speech was suppose to be much longer, but it went 1500 characters beyond the limit. :(