God does not exist

It seems my opponent misunderstood or is attempting to use tricks in order to sway the vote. Con posts the definition for omnipotent but only goes by the 2nd example given which is exactly the same meaning as the 1st definition just worded differently. om"nip"o"tent [om-nip-uh-tuhnt] Show IPA adjective 1. almighty or infinite in power, as God. 2. having very great or unlimited authority or power. http://www.merriam-webster.com... The two definitions i gave are the same as the ones given above just worded differently as to make it easier to understand. There are two so that we can discuss what power is the 2nd one below is used becuase some say the ability to create a square circle is not a matter of power as the shape itself is impossible to create and therefore should not count as a valid argument against gods power. Now the 1st definition is used because people say logic does not affect god and he can indeed create a square circles. 1. The ability to do anything even the logically absurd 2. the ability to do anything as long a it is logical And as proven by my 1st round both of these definitions fail and as such makes it impossible for an omnipotent(all powerful) entity to exist. ***CON says **** . My opponent also made the assumption that God would create a more powerful being then Himself. I ask what makes that fact?***** It would appear con misunderstood again i did not state that god would create a being more powerful than himself. This was to prove that and omnipotent being by the 1st definition given could not exist. I stated that if god could do even the logically absurd than he would be capabe of creating a being that was more powerful than himself and since it is possibleto be more powerful then god then god is not omnipotent as he is not all powerful if there is a level higher than god. (Remember that being able to do even the logically absurd means god would be able to create a being that surpasses infinite power as the idea of passing infinite is illogical but logic does not affect god in this definition ) *****con says**** My opponent also seems to imply that in this supernatural scenario that God could not move physical things without Him also being physical. God does not need to be physical to have logic or to move physical things even in a world made up of matter. Even if God is made up fully of matter then that still does not make Him unable to exist. **** Again con does not seem to understand My point on god not being able to move objects was to prove the 2nd definition also fails. We know and can that in order to move somthng in the universe we need matter and energy. Ek=1/2mv^2 is the equation for kinetic energy. If m=0 there is no velocity and if ek=0 again there is n velocity and as such no motion at all. NOW if god goes by this 2nd definition he MUST be made up of matter or energy to move an object and since he would have to be made up of matter or energy he would have limits based on the matter and energy he is made up of and therefore could not be omnitpotent(infinite power) (If god lacks the power to move somthing he is again not omnipotent) ****Con says****My opponent seems confident in concluding that matter, time, space, the universe and energy are all eternal but that's just speculative thought. My opponent then finds no viable evidence that God could exist when the religious say all that we see everyday shows God's existence. Pointing too that there could be numerous proofs for God's existence and we ignore them. Then my opponent's does calculations for us like 0 not equaling 1 but He forgets that God makes up 1. Therefore God starts us at 1 and then He creates equaling 2 which is viable, 1+1=2.**** I provided clear cut logic to explain how the universe could possibly have always existed. Somthing cannot come from nothing as such somthing must have always existed. (MOST BASIC MEANING 0 does not equal 1) We know that matter and energy exist. We also know due to the first law of thermodynamics that matter cannot be created or destroyed. Therefore since it cannot be created from nothing we can say logically that both matter and energy have always existed. We know both matter and energy exist withing space and time and as such space and time have always existed. The universe is made up of matter,energy,space and time therfore the universe has always existed. **** con says **** We can never determine that an omnibelovant and omniscience being cannot exist without proper evidence to determine so. It is reasonable to assume that this being would not create evil beings but it does not show any reasons why He couldn't. There is also no evidence that God created evil people**** I Have used logic as evidence that an omnibelevolent and omniscience being cannot exist. An omnibelovlent being meaning perfect goodness would not create a man if he knew 100% that the man would commit evil acts If he did he would not be perfectly good as he would have wished for that man to do the evil things. Since god is supposed to be omniscience(All knowing) and omnibelovolent (perfectly good) then evil cannot exist as he would not create those who would commit the evil acts . Evil does exist and as such it is impossible for an omniscience,omnipotent,omnibelevolent being to exist. Con also says that there is no evidence to say god created evil people but god is said to have created everyone and even then if he is not responsible for creating the evil people As an omnibelovlent,omniscience being he would know when the evil acts would be commited and how but does nothing to stop them. If god allows evil to exist and does nothing to stop it then he is wishing the evil things be done and cannot be omnibelovolent. I Have proven through logic that an omnipotent being cannot exist. I have proven through logic that An omnipotent.omnibelovolent,omniscience being cannot exist in universe with evil as the being would have the knowledge of the coming evil the power to prevent it and be obligated to stop it as a perfectly good being could not allow evil to exist. Another look at omnibelevolent through noahs ark god sends a flood to wipe out the population of the earth and we know killing to be evil making god evil for killing and not omnibelovolent