The Biblical God exist and is Morally justified!

. (`;') Conclusion: All I have to do is show reasons why God exist. My opponent says they are not sufficient since I have the burden of proof. Also I'm stumped as to why my opponent claims I offer just bare assertions when in light of the evidence, God seems apparent. Then I have no clue why a personnel experience has no bearing on belief of it. This assumption would not be false and in fact the beginnings of way to observe this event again. My opponent even admits that he doesn't believe his own girlfriends personnel opinion on the subject. I agree that just because someone says something does not mean that it is true. I think we all experience everyday. But I'm not offering one or two experiences. I offering trillions. These numbers and documented evidences are to much to simply ignore as make believe. W edo believe in some weird stuff and many have a different aspect of God but the belief in that God is constant. The majority of all societies derive from belief in some sort of God. My opponent also wants to assert that aliens do not exist. The word aliens period is a assumption cause maybe they are not alien at all. Though I do offer millions of UFo claims that we are not the only life. I do not believe in aliens as we know them but it is a expanding phenomena. My opponent offers us a quote. I thank him for this quote because it proves a point I am trying to make. In his quote "We can speculate on the origin of the biggest thing we know—the universe. " Right here is saying that all they are doing is speculating from observing. Then on it says," Maybe the universe itself sprang into existence out of nothingness—a gigantic vacuum fluctuation which we know today as the big bang. " Again here we start with maybe. I think this quote itself hurst my opponents case. In trying to prove your point when you have modern science backing, you choose in bringing up a quote with 'Speculation' and 'Maybe' as its key words is a grave error in my opponents part because it helps my points. He also offers another quote from Alexander Vilenkin that portrays his belief in the Big Bang not facts. In the patterns of order in our universe would go to us both because nature could have been designed for order and it seems natural or as my opponent suggests order just exist. I think though as people we seek order alot in our lives. We plan and think about the future always and this appears to be universal intuition. It is bare pride to suggest that a God who created you for whatever purpose He had in creating you has to do what we want. Do parents do as thier kids ask, maybe in blessing them, but primairly the child listens to the parent. The child must learn to become wise it is just unlogical to think of the opposite. God does not want us to suffer in his will but we do not do God's will so therefore we suffer by choice. Con refuses to understand this. God taught peace and love in one another. So I naturally fell to see how governments and wealthy people allowing millions to starve is God's problem and not ours. Is there food to eat? Yes! Then the real reason these children go hungry is because Men allow it and do not care. I assure my opponent God is coming to rid the world of such hatred and evil along with those who deny him. So my opponent asserts that God needs to help hungry children when it is man who starves them and then blames God for not stopping it. This is just plain crazy talk! I'm sure that God did know about our evil before hand. But if God went ahead and destroyed all who choose evil before they choose it means He gave them no free will to choose it and justice has failed. We all must decide our path and refuse the path layed ahead. This is man;s decisions and God allows him to make them. I agree God did create us because He wanted us but we chose evil and evil must be cast out and destroyed in its place in time. I think my opponent provided no good reason why we should put away all prior belief in God. I myself used my personnel experience and those of others to make my stance. As the rules provide no sources. My opponent did give a good arguement and allowed me to express my opinions and also his. So just to go over my points again. Breif Summary of my points: 1. God has alot of personnel experieces that support His existance. 2. God is outside of scientific and philosophical boundaries. 3. God set and established moral Law for man. 4. It is man's fault for all earthly suffering. 5. Man's moral structure has become hallow. 6. There is a ultimate standard of Goodness. Thanks to my opponent and all who read. This has been very interesting to view my opponents view. Thanks! Vote~Pro