God probably exists

Con stated that my example of the structures on Mars is the common deist argument of God being a sort of watchmaker. However, I didn't state that. I am saying that if structures are found on Mars, which is more likely a) that is was put there by an intelligent being or b) that it just occured through natural processes. The obvious answer is a. It has nothing to do with complexity at all; it's just, which is more likely to believe? I could even use Con's argument to support my point: P1: A watch is complex; It is man made.P2: A person is complex. C: It is made by a god.You dropped my rebuttal. If there was a "creator" of the watch, then what is more likely about a person's origins? Would anybody honestly say that the watch composed itself through random accidental means over thousands of years? I've stated this already, and so I ask again: what is more likely about the origin of man? If we find the evolutiionary standpoint fallacious in material objects, why do we accept a random evolutionary accident over man's origins? http://en.wikipedia.org... What was the orgin of God? What does this have to do with the fine-tuning argument? The facts I presented demonstrate that life is improbable througut the entire universe. Stephen Hawking states in his book A Brief History of Time that, "The laws of science, as we know them at present, contain many fundamental numbers, like the size of the electric charge of the electron and the ratio of the masses of the proton and the electron. ... The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life" (A Brief History of Time, Bantam Books, ISBN 0-553-05340-X, p. 125).http://en.wikipedia.org...You also dropped one of my points about the chance that there really is ONE 'setting'. How do we know that there is a boom/crush cycle in the universe? That could happen. This means nothing. Con states, "Why is a God needed to fine tune the universe?" Well, again both Dawkins and Hawking (who are not theists) have stated you can find a "designer" out of a fine-tuned universe. I am arguing that this designer is God.That is not an answer to the question I asked you.He misunderstands my argument. I'm not arguing that atheists are bad people. I'm stating that atheists have to find natural, evolutionary processes to explain any moralistic or altruistic deeds that people perform. Two common examples mentioned are reciprocal advantage or genetic kinship to which I provided my 3 examples above which don't fit into these categories. https://en.wikipedia.org... Which happens to fall under the kinship.We are porgramed by evolution to care about the well being of our young and the weak. Try slapping a tiger cub in front of its mother and I will bet you will be attacked and die unless you have a 'S' on your shirt. I could give you a long answer , but I dont like long winded answers. My last argument on Hell was not a "scare tactic" as Con tries to argue. Again, Con misunderstand my point. What is the purpose of creating a place of eternal torment for people if religion was man-made from the beginning? Heaven could be argued that it's "man-made" but what is the purpose of Hell? This is just an absurd arguemnt. Hell is part of Religion. If you argue hell exists, then that invalidates the All-Loving part of God. If God sent people to hell, then that meant he doesn't have any love for them.1. The ancient Hebrews (writers of the Bible) were the only group of their time to argue that God created the universe out of nothing. There was no pre-existing matter available. This is a remarkable thing because all other religions had "a god" or "gods" create the univese out of pre-existing material. I mention this point because modern science agrees that the universe came out of nothing. Only the Hebrews knew this in antiquity.a form ofhttp://en.wikipedia.org...Means nothing. I only reference the Bible because it clearly says Israel would be restored and reestablished, and they were in 1948. http://en.wikipedia.org...Nostradamus perdicted Gangnam Style. It's true:From the calm morning, the end will come when of the dancing horse the number of circles will be nineThe first line refers to KoreaThe second? The end of the world.Third. The dance Psy does in the Music Video.And the last. The nine zeros in the number 1,000,000,000, which is how many views GS got last year.This is really a hoax. However, this doesn't mean it's point is invalid. Anyone can predict anything.