This House Believes that Mining cause more harm than good

"Please read my arguments carefully" Let me do my last round But first let me expand your 15 deaths that you are saying If they do mining, there will be water contamination. First if there is water contamination, the poor people who have no money to buy purified water, there will have 2 effects. 1st they will be poisoned or 2nd they will be die because of thirst or dehydration. millions of people will suffer because of it. Second it can affect fishes. Once acid drainage is created, metals are released into the surrounding environment, and become readily available to biological organisms. In water, for example, when fish are exposed directly to metals and H+ ions through their gills, impaired respiration may result from chronic and acute toxicity. Fish are also exposed indirectly to metals through ingestion of contaminated sediments and food items. A common weathering product of sulfide oxidation is the formation of iron hydroxide (Fe(OH)3), a red/orange colored precipitate found in thousands of miles of streams affected by AMD. Iron hydroxides and oxyhydroxides may physically coat the surface of stream sediments and streambeds destroying habitat, diminishing availability of clean gravels used for spawning, and reducing fish food items such as benthic macroinvertebrates. Acid mine drainage, characterized by acidic metalliferous conditions in water, is responsible for physical, chemical, and biological degradation of stream habitat. http://northern.org... And if the fish will be affected. There will be fish kills. If there is fish kill, if most of the poor people will die of hunger, or they will eat this because of hunger. They will die of food poison. And most of the fishermen will be loss. And they will have no money to buy their food, they will die of hunger. Another million people will die. With my enemy's arguments. I can say that he is focusing in -Modernization (Technology) -Health What are the purpose of these technology if people died because of mining. Now going to my speech I do not say that we should ban mining, that we should stop mining. What I am proving that mining is harmful to humans, to the environment, to the animals. Is saying the negative, harmful effects of mining I believe that i have won this debate because I proved that mining in terms of health, environmental, and economical. Health- It is a domino effect. If there will be mining there will have many effects. If there is mining there will have the collusion of the ground. And it will affect the people live nearby. And the people who drink, use, or eat the waste it produce which can cause poison. And even the animals. And the fishes will be affected because of water contamination, and the toxic waste that have been thrown in the river, streams, or ocean. "LIFE IS PRICELESS" Environmental- Just what i said, it can cause sinkholes or landslides that can destroy the beauty of a place. It can destroy the animals habitats. If their habitat is gone. They might be endangered or badly extinct. Mining can cause pollution also especially the water pollution. If these resources are gone there, they will just leaving it ugly and they could not bring it back to its beautiful state. Economical- If there is mining the mineral itself will be gone. These resources are limited and they take time to grow. If these resources will be gone, we will be in danger. If there is mining, water contamination will occur. If water contamination occur, there will be fish kill. If there is fish kill most of the fishermen will be loss. With that I say I have won this debate -stackerz21