Cats are not evil.

Ok, seeing that Im_always_right (I'm always opposite of left, for clarification) employed the assistance of her mother, Xera, I will not give equal consideration. Additionally, IAR, (IAO of L) stated in a personal comment that she desired a no holds barred debate from this point, I will proceed to give her such. Now I will rebuild my case and to add further substantial information to negate the statement that ‘cats are not evil'. From this point on Im always right will be referred to in this debate as I'm always opposite of left (IAO of L for short), as she did not refute the content of this argument, only it's relevance to the resolution. This point still is upheld, and it is relevant to the argument because it was a precautionary measure to prevent the use of semantics to win the debate. The Affirmative cannot use the fact that she claims that she is always right, since I have shown that she in not always correct, rather she is always opposite of left. It is a fact that she is right handed. Previous debates are not relevant to the prior context of this debate. Furthermore, as a Christian yourself, the source of Satan is in fact from the hand of God, as God created everything on heaven and earth, (and hell, for that matter.) Please refer to the following link for more information. http://en.wikipedia.org... Man does kill and man can be evil. That is the divine right of free will to choose good over evil that was given to us by God. Cats are not given this divine right; they are only evil and cannot choose to be good. What you are stating is God created everything, man is evil, but cats are not evil? That does not follow logic, and syllogistically under your logic, should say God created everything, man is evil, and thus everything God created is evil. Following your logical path, this must include cats, and thus, by your logic, cats are in fact evil. On bathing cats: IAO of L has never in bathed a cat to my knowledge. If she had EVER given a cat a bath, she would have known their evilness. Instead, IAO of L always has had either Lorca or Xera bath her cats, thus she does not know of the pure evilness that emanates from a single cat while it is being given a bath. You've never heard of a cat killing someone? Why do you think they keep the lions, tigers, panthers, etc. behind inch thick glass at the zoo? Because these cats have been known to kill people! This debate was never clarified to the common housecat. Large game cats do in fact kill many of people, mostly people in Africa. Cats do spread disease. One simple case in point is Cat Scratch Fever. Beyond the harm that Ted Nugent has done, cat scratch fever is listed by the CDC as a communicable disease that animals can give to humans. http://www.cdc.gov... Furthermore, the animal kingdom is not completely self-centered. There are social animals (http://en.wikipedia.org...) in which animals form groups in other to achieve greater goals. Anything ranging from bees to elephant herds form social groups in which they give something up. Now before you think it, I know lions form prides, which make them social animals. But the only cats that form social groups will kill you, me, and any human that comes in its way if it is hungry enough, and will do it in a group! As for other cats, they are completely self centered and do not care about the welfare of others. They are the parasites of the mammalians, leeching off everything else to only serve them. IAO of L still has not concretely proven there is a God, which is a major foundation of Christian belief. Instead, she simply stated that since I am a Christian I believe. I contend that if this was the case, only people that first believe in God can become Christians. If this was the case, why would so many missionaries be trying to "spread" the word of God if the only people that believed in God are Christians? As a Christian I do believe in God, but I do not believe that this is even the majority for people on this website. And of the people that do believe in God, I would contend that over half of them do not believe that God created everything. I reaffirm my position that IAO of L must prove God created everything, aliens didn't do it, and that there is a God. Now for new argumentation against the statement "Cats are not evil": In order for the negative to win this debate, I need only to prove that some cats are evil, or that cats are a little bit evil. The affirmative has locked herself into the burden to prove that all cats are not evil. I contend to anyone that has seen pet cemetery that there are evil cats in the world. As a Christian, IAO of L also has the burden of dispelling Christian belief that cats are in fact evil. Please refer to the following link for details. http://dbhome.dk... Additionally, cats are associated with witches, who are by Christian standards, evil. This is not a comparison debate, meaning we're not saying that cats are better/worse than dogs, not are we saying "We dogs are worse than it than cats are" Instead, we are simple arguing the evilness of cats. Finally, I argue that the positive utility created by cats is created purely in the minds of their owners and cat lovers. Cats absorb resources and do not give back any positive good that is not realized but in the mind of the beholder. Take for example a cat that rubs up against your leg. This cat wants you to scratch its back. It does not want to give you pleasure because it is soft and cuddly. No, it only wishes that you scratch the spot it can't reach. Cats cannot be made to serve another creature, and will not fetch, bring your slippers, nor serve as a good hunting companion. I ask the readers of this debate, when was the last time you thought that a cat would scare off someone trying to break into your house? When was the last time you saw a seeing eye cat? If you are like me and have never seen any of these things, you must vote for Lorca, as cats (at least some) are evil.