It is possible for a tri-omni god to coexist with the evil which exists in this World.

I will begin my final round addressing your emboldened question and subsequent conclusion:Q: "Is it possible for a tri-omni god to coexist with the reality which we know?"C: " If you don't think that we live in a World that has the absolute minimum of pain and suffering theoretically possible, you must find against the motion."I agree with your conclusion (except for the last portion), in that, I see many "evils" that exist in this world that don't have to. In fact, I am quite confident that no one of sound mind would disagree with you. Everyone will have some idea of "evil" that exists in this world. For instance, cancer should be a blatantly obvious example everyone can agree on. However...The key issue with this question is the last part: "...the reality which we know". We are constrained to our experiences and to our human perception and limited cognitive ability to make this judgment. Who are we to declare that such a proposition is *impossible* while we are subject to such incredible limitations?Impossibility (or "does not exist") is absolute and requires absolute certainly to be proven true. I am not merely appealing to the epistemological barrier [1] to take advantage of it, but omniscience is required to make a valid judgment to know the absolute answer to this question. As I have explained in previous argument, in order for evil to be removed from this world, ALL possibilities would have had to have been prevented from being possible. This due to concept of evil being both subjective and comparative.In short (too late, I know), we can only declare absolute impossibility with certainly if the subject is subjective to our definitions (in that, we know everything about it since we created it), such as with a math problem. Here, we have an attempt to reach a hard, logical conclusion with the Argument from Evil, but since this is pertaining to reality (which is objective), the conclusion cannot be drawn with absolute certainty. Since our words do not define reality (they are subjective), we do not know everything about the subject in order to make an absolute claim, either way.Also, as stated in my previous arguments, there is already an unimaginable amount of evil that has *already* been prevented from being possible if such a tri-omni being does exist, which would be a direct result of its will. This indicates that such a being has *already* determined the absolute minimum amount of evil to occur in this world. Since our perception and knowledge is limited, we cannot possibly understand this, whereas, the omniscient being has also taken into consideration that which we know to be impossible and that which we cannot even begin to fathom.I will present two more examples to illustrate my point.#1. Imagine that a malevolent, mosquito-like insect existed in this world; a venomous creature that, if it merely touched a person, it would infect them incurably. The victim's very DNA would be so mutated that they would fall into a catatonic state and even cease to age and no longer require the consumption of food and water. The victim, despite appearing catatonic, is actually fully aware as the venom creates unimaginable, perpetual agony. Finally, the creatures then carry off the helpless victim to hide them so they can't be killed by their fellows and their agony ended.This idea should seem as horrible to you as it is absurd. But, this is one of the possibilities of evil that HAS been prevented from being possible in this world if a tri-omni being exists. We are fortunate that all of the evils that DO exist in this world are temporal.#2. Imagine that pain and death were not possible in this world, and that everyone is perfectly healthy at all times; there is no disease and no cancer. Now imagine a group of teenagers sitting in a classroom. The teacher intends to pass out iPads to each of the teenagers. He has exactly enough for all of them, but one of the iPads is older and inferior. The teenager who receives that iPad will view the unfairness and subsequent 'mental suffering' as "evil" (either the act alone, or the teacher for the decision) by at least that teenager because there is nothing worse to compare it to.I formulated this example based around teenagers because we can all imagine some of them complaining and crying about getting an inadequate iPad. This petty "suffering" occurs because they do not have any "real" suffering to compare it to. This would occur to everyone if there was no "real" suffering in the world. The worst possibilities will always inherit the label of evil. Note that if all of the teenagers received the same inadequate iPad, there would not be any "mental suffering" which demonstrates a reliance on comparison.Final Conclusion:I believe that I have shown that it is *possible* for an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent being to coexist with the evils in this world because:A.) Due to the subjective and comparative nature of the concept of evil, it will *always* exists as long as there is a means of comparison, which would entail the elimination of all but one available possibility.B.) Due to point 'A', only an omniscient being would be able to comprehend where to 'draw the line' on the good/evil spectrum of possibility for minimum evil, and since our perception and knowledge is very limited by our perception, knowledge, and experience, we cannot expect to understand this perfect judgment.Remember, I do not have to prove that such a being exists; merely that it is possible for such a being to coexist with the evil in this world.I wish to sincerely thank my opponent for participating in this debate.[1] Wikipedia: Epistemology ('Truth' section) - http://en.wikipedia.org...