BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
If the Bible is true and accurate then Jesus Is Lord (God)

Answered Jesus, "is this: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one. ( Mark 12:29) ""Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good"except God alone." (Mark 10:18) Luke 22:41-44 : (41) Then He distanced himself from them about a stone throw away, then he knelt down to pray dab his words: (42) "O my Father, if you are willing, take this cup than me, but not my will but thy will, that terjad, (43) Then an angel from heaven appeared to him to give strength unto Him (44) He was very frightened and prayed more earnestly. His sweat became like blood dots bertetesan to the ground. John 14:28 - Jesus says, "The Father is greater than I." Hebrews 2:9 says that Jesus was made for a while "lower than the angels" at the Incarnation. John 17:3 - "And this is eternal life, that they know You are the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent." John 20:17 - "I ascend to My Father and to your Father, My God and to your God." John 17:6-8: 6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word. 7 Now they have known that ALL THINGS whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee. 8 For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me John 12:49 For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. John 8:26 I have many things to say and to judge of you: but he that sent me is true; and I speak to the world those things which I have heard of him. John 14:24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me. John 20:16-18 : "I can do nothing on my own authority; as I hear, I judge, and my judgement is just, because I seek not my own will, but the will of Him who sent me" (John 5:30) 16 Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say, Master. 17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. 18 Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the LORD, and that he had spoken these things unto her. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com...
If the Bible is true and accurate then Jesus Is Lord (God)

If the Bible is true and accurate then Jesus Is Lord (God). John 14:7-10 [7]"If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him." [8]"Philip said, "Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us." " [9]"Jesus answered: "Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, `Show us the Father'? "[10]"Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you are not just my own. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. John 10:30 ""I and the Father are one." John 14:11 "Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the miracles themselves. John 10:37-38 [37]"Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does. [38]"But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father." Matthew 27:43 He trusts in God. Let God rescue him now if he wants him, for he said, 'I am the Son of God.'" John 17:11 " I will remain in the world no longer, but they are still in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, protect them by the power of your name--the name you gave me--so that they may be one as we are one.
theism is atheism

I am a three fingers behind your back Agnostic. I will need faith that you have 3 fingers behind your back to be a 3 fingers behind your back Theist, and I do not choose faith in 3 fingers behind your back. I have no documentation that you always have 3 fingers behind your back. I do not have accounts of others that you had 3 fingers behind your back in the past. I have no experiences with you having 3 fingers behind your back to build on. I have no proof that you have 3 fingers behind your back. I have no proof against you having 3 fingers behind your back. Therefore, I am a 3 fingers behind your back Agnostic. I do not choose 3 fingers behind your back Theism or Atheism. I will need more accounts from others, more evidence, and/or more experiences with your 3 fingers behind your back to build on to make a decision.
theism is atheism

Theism is Atheism? I take the Con stance based on this. 3 fingers behind your back Atheists and Atheists are two seperate things. Atheism is a lack of belief in a god/gods. http://atheists.org...? If you lack a belief in a god/gods, you are an Atheist according to this site made by Athiests. In contrast, if you do not lack a belief in a god/gods, you are a Theist. Theist and Atheists are not the same thing. If you say you have 3 fingers behind your back, but really have 5, 1and someone has a lack of belief in you having 3 fingers, they are a 3 fingers behind your back Atheist, but not an "Atheist" by definition. 3 fingers behind your back Atheists and Atheists are two different things. Atheists lack a belief in a god/gods. 3 fingers behind your back Atheists lack a belief in 3 fingers behind your back. 3 fingers behind your back Atheists do not neccessarily lack a belief in a god/gods.
theism is atheism

I'm not sure whether I believe you are an alien or whether three fingers behind your back are true. I am Agnostic on all acounts. I have no faith in either and do not have a belief in either, but I accept that you may indeed be an alien and that you msy have 3 fingers behind your back. I am neither a Theist or an Atheist on either account. Show me your 3 fingers behind your back or lack thereof by appearing at my home, and I'll be a Theist or Atheist on 3 fingers. If you are indeed an alien, you should hover on over to my home and show me some nonhuman characteristics and advanced technology. With that technology, you should be able to easily GPS me, zip on over, and reveal yourself. If you choose not to, then I will understand and stay an Agnostic on your being an alien.
theism is atheism

I have no guarantee that you even have fingers. You could have been born with no fingers at all. You could be a computer, an artifical intelligence, with no human body to have 3 fingers or even a back. You could be an alien from another planet with tenticals and no fingers. You could be invisible to my 3 dimensional sight because you are from another dimension. Perhaps you are in another galaxy and have decided to make contact with me but your signal got here later and you put arbitrary answers and/or questions to make your future opponent think the debate is happening live. You may have had 3 fingers behind your back when you sent this debate, but you are now long deceased and do not have 3 fingers behind your back at this present time because you are long since deceased. If you could meet up with a time traveler from the future and bring them to me, they could declare the future. Perhaps they have documentation of the results of this debate and both of our future answers. If you can bring them to me with the documentation, and I watch myself presently type what they say I will type, then my theistic view of them being from the future may change. I might use skepticism to convince myself that I only typed it because of the power of suggestion. Nevertheless, I have no burden of needing to find a documentation that tells the future. That burden is on you because you must convince voters that Theism is Atheism whether by future documentation, experiences, proof, logic, or any other thing that you can imagine with your mind. If you can show me that you have 3 fingers behind your back, I will be a 3 fingers behind your back Theist. If not, I may not ever choose faith in 3 fingers behind your back. The burden is on you to get me to choose a belief in 3 fingers or a lack of belief in 3 fingers, but I am still a 3 fingers Agnostic and neither a Theist or an Atheist of 3 fingers behind your back. You will need to show or say something to convert me. Preach to me about 3 fingers. If I am blessed with a 3 fingers behind your back vision, experience the spirit and answered prayers of 3 fingers, I may never convert, but I am open minded that 3 fingers behind your back may exist because it seems possible on a certain level. I do not feel its spirit, nor has it answered any prayers yet, but it might, so I am currently a 3 fingers behind your back Agnostic. https://en.m.wikipedia.org...
Quiz

1- whichever one provided the sh1ttest content. 2- I never watched pokemon mate 3- well 3x 10 is 30, divided by 5 is 6. But 10/2 is 5, times 3 thats 15. So ima take the average of both answers (6 n 15)- the final answer my friend is 12.5!! 4-Two negatives make a positive 5- Dont give a sh1t
There is no good reason for the death penalty to be banned .

'Alright. You state that the burden of proving the illegitimacy lies on my shoulder, I feel as though you should take equal steps to prove the legitimacy of such a measure.' This is a logical fallacy , It doesn't matter what you feel the title clearly says 'There is no good reason for the death penalty to be banned ' now the burden of proof lies onto you , you have to prove to me that there are good reasons to ban it , I don't have to state my case . 'killing someone will not bring justice to the situation. It won't undo what they did, ' I could use the same argument in a case in which I would argue that we should not punish murderers since we can't bring back the lost lives . It's a highest form of punishment of course it is not nice but the criminals who deserve it have done incredibly evil crimes . ', all it does is claim another life at greater expense to the state (' Why is it a greater expense to the state? I don't get my opponents argument . 'You state there is no good reason to stop it, which I hope to prove fundamentally untrue, but can you give me reasons why it is worth keeping?' like I explained at the beginning the burden of proof lies onto my opponent . I support it because these criminals deserve it why would I be against it? is the question and I really do not need to expand , I could but I don't have to therefore i'm not going to because it's my opponents job to come up with arguments against it . 'The average life span in America is 71 for males, the most common offenders and only offenders who see the death penalty. So saying that convicts will live until they are 90-100 is unlikely and I have never seen any cases where this is ' you are the one who said a 20 year old man will live 70-80 years not me I was correcting your mistake . 'Regardless of how rare or heinous the crime is, stripping a person of their life is an act that is has frightening implications placing a lot of power into the hands of the legal system.' there would be restrictions on who the death penalty can be imposed on . 'It is important to note that the vast majority of the expense of the death penalty is not in the method of execution' Yet you said the cost of keeping someone alive is not less than killing someone through capital punishment . therefore what is the argument here? . The Title is important here I do not have to prove anything my opponent has to prove it to me . Once again I have to point out that the burden of proof lies onto my opponent.
There is no good reason for the death penalty to be banned .

Alright. You state that the burden of proving the illegitimacy lies on my shoulder, I feel as though you should take equal steps to prove the legitimacy of such a measure. You state that the aim of the legal system is to punish and reform, but someone who commits such heinous crimes does not deserve reformation. I think this is a horrible thing to say, regardless of your religious standpoint. From the standpoint of a humanitarian, killing someone will not bring justice to the situation. It won't undo what they did, they are already being restrained from doing it again, all it does is claim another life at greater expense to the state (which I believe is plenty of reason to not use the death penalty). You state there is no good reason to stop it, which I hope to prove fundamentally untrue, but can you give me reasons why it is worth keeping? The average life span in America is 71 for males, the most common offenders and only offenders who see the death penalty. So saying that convicts will live until they are 90-100 is unlikely and I have never seen any cases where this is so (there are some who are arrested later in life and one man is 94 but he was 89 at the time of his arrest). You say that you would only support the death penalty in serious cases to which I ask what constitutes a serious crime? Regardless of how rare or heinous the crime is, stripping a person of their life is an act that is has frightening implications placing a lot of power into the hands of the legal system. The method of killing them is hardly important, though you cite shooting rather than lethal injection. It is important to note that the vast majority of the expense of the death penalty is not in the method of execution and it is only legal to execute by firing squad in 2 states so shooting someone as a method of death penalty is again unlikely. If necessary I can post links to where I got this information for and place the debate in your hands, hoping that you can provide reasons for why the death penalty is a necessary and useful tool of the legal system.
There is no good reason for the death penalty to be banned .

'Why should the death penalty be legal?' The burden of proof lies onto my opponent to prove that there is a good reason to ban it , It's a form of punishment , we aim to punish criminals and reform criminals but if a criminal is so evil at heart or commited a horrible crime than I do not believe he is worthy of living . I simply support it because I do not believe there are any good reasons to stop this type of punishment . 'Let's say you've got someone who is 20 years old, convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison.Estimating at most he will live another 60-70 years at a reasonable 30k a year' 60-70 years is quite a lot a 20 year old living another 70 or 80 years that would either make him 90 or a 100 or do you mean he will live until he is 70 or 80 ?. I would like to mention that I support the death penalty only in very serious cases . ' 1.8 million dollars is exactly what the legal proceedings would cost to find them guilty, appeal to a higher court, and to put them on death row. ' I want to point out that first of all , like I said before it would be quite rare and generally wouldn't be used for crimes like first degree murder or rape what you are telling me is that because the costs are the same its worth banning one form of punishment? this doesnt make sense . Also I support the prisoner getting shot rather than through something like lethal injection. Since I haven't used any statistics or anything in my argument I do not have to list the sources since there is none i'm just refuting my opponents arguments since the burden of proof lies onto him .
There is no good reason for the death penalty to be banned .

Why should the death penalty be legal? Before I get too in depth into my reasoning, I'd like to hear yours as to why it should. I anticipate you will mention something about the cost of keeping someone locked up. Let's say you've got someone who is 20 years old, convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison. Estimating at most he will live another 60-70 years at a reasonable 30k a year (this is more than the cost of keeping a felon in prison in my home state of Ohio but I rounded up anyway). That puts the cost at 1.8 million dollars. That's for a relatively young convict who will live a long life. 1.8 million dollars is exactly what the legal proceedings would cost to find them guilty, appeal to a higher court, and to put them on death row. Not to mention in the meantime this person is sitting in prison using tax dollar money that those who support the death penalty are allegedly trying to protect. It could take 5, 10, 20 years for this person to make it on to death row and finally be executed. So from a financial standpoint, it is certainly not the more viable option. As for morals, ethics, and terms of justice, I will address these issues later on in the debate. Here are the works I cited to get the numbers, so that you can be sure I'm telling the truth and not fabricating statistics. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org... https://www.federalregister.gov...
Jokes!

So this new bar opens and the owner can't think of a name. So he decides to name the bar after the 3rd person who walks in. It takes doesn't take long and soon the 3rd customer walks in. The owner jumps up and walks over to the girl. "You're the 3rd person to enter my bar and I'm going to name it after you." "Okay," she says, "my name is Jill." The owner looks her over and says, "I like your legs so I'm going to name the bar 'Jill's Legs'" The next day a bum is sitting outside the bar and a cop asks him what he's doing. He answers, "Waiting for Jill's Legs to open so I can get a drink!" -*************************- Q: What is the mating call of a blonde? A: "I'm soooo drunk." -************************- A boy is born without a body, only a head. For his 18th birthday his father, takes him to a bar for a drink. The father orders his son a scotch and when the boy drinks it, an arm pops out of his head. He drinks another shot and another arm pops out. After the next shot a torso pops out. After more shots, suddenly, he has a whole body. The boy runs out of the bar and gets hit by a truck, killing him instantly. A drunkard in the corner looks at the father and says, "He should have quit while he was a head." -*************************- Little Johnny's first grade class was playing "Name That Animal." The teacher held up a picture of a cat and asked, "What animal is this?" "A cat!" said Suzy. "Good job. Now, what's this animal?" "A dog!" said Ricky. "Good. Now what animal is this?" she asked, holding up a picture of a deer. The class fell silent. After a couple of minutes, the teacher said, "It's what your mom calls your dad." "I know!" called out Little Johnny. "A horny bastard!" -*****************- A salesman rings the door bell and Little Johnny answers. Salesman: "Can I see your dad?" Johnny: "No, he's in the shower." Salesman: "What about your mother? Can I see her?" Johnny: "Nope. She's in the shower, too." Salesman: "Do you think they'll be out soon?" Johnny: "Doubt it. When my dad asked me for the Vaseline, I gave him super glue instead." -**************- Two old men, Abe and Sol, sit on a park bench feeding pigeons and talking about baseball. Abe turns to Sol and asks, "Do you think there's baseball in Heaven?" Sol thinks about it for a minute and replies, "I dunno. But let's make a deal -- if I die first, I'll come back and tell you if there's baseball in Heaven, and if you die first, you do the same." They shake on it and sadly, a few months later, poor Abe passes on. Soon afterward, Sol sits in the park feeding the pigeons by himself and hears a voice whisper, "Sol... Sol... ." Sol responds, "Abe! Is that you?" "Yes it is, Sol," whispers Abe's ghost. Sol, still amazed, asks, "So, is there baseball in Heaven?" "Well," says Abe, "I've got good news and bad news." "Gimme the good news first," says Sol. Abe says, "Well, there is baseball in Heaven." Sol says, "That's great! What news could be bad enough to ruin that?" Abe sighs and whispers, "You're pitching on Friday." Happy New Year's everyone! ;)
Jokes!

Happy New Year's everyone! A little kid gets on a city bus, sits right behind the driver, and starts talking loudly, "If my dad was a bull and my mom a cow, I'd be a little bull."The driver gets annoyed as the kids continues to yammer on. "If my dad was an rooster and my mom a hen, I would be a little chick."The kid goes on and on with all the animals he knows, when finally, the bus driver yells, "What if your dad was a bum and your mom was a drunk?" The kid smiles and says, "I'd be a bus driver." ***************************** A blind man walks into a bar, taps the man next him, and says, "Hey, wanna hear a blonde joke?" The man says back to the blind man, "Look buddy, I'm blonde. The man behind me is a 400-pound professional wrestler and he is blonde. The bouncer is blonde. The man sitting over to your left is also blonde. Still wanna tell that blonde joke?" The blind man is silent for a moment and then says, "Nah, I wouldn't want to have to explain it five times." ***************************** Q.Why do drunks throw up in the sewer? A.So homeless people can have breakfast. ***************************** A husband and wife are in bed when there is a knock at the door. The husband rolls over and looks at his clock -- it's 3:30 a.m. He drags himself out of bed and goes downstairs. When he opens the door, there is a drunk slumped there. "Hi ya," slurs the stranger. "Can you give me a push?" "Get lost," says the man. "It's half-past three." He slams the door and goes back up to bed. He tells his wife about the drunk. She says, "Dave, that wasn't very nice of you. Remember that night we broke down in the pouring rain and you had to knock on that man's door? What would've happened if he'd told us to get lost?" So, the husband gets back out of bed and goes downstairs. He opens the door and calls out, "Hey, do you still want a push?" A voice answers, "Yes, please." "Where are you?" calls the man. The stranger replies, "I'm over here -- on your swing set." ************************************ A Sunday school teacher is concerned that his students might be a little confused about Jesus, so he asks his class, "Where is Jesus today?" Steven raises his hand and says, "He's in Heaven." Mary answers, "He's in my heart." Little Johnny waves his hand furiously and blurts out, "He's in our bathroom!" The surprised teacher asks Little Johnny how he knows this. "Well," Little Johnny says, "every morning, my father gets up, bangs on the bathroom door and yells 'Jesus Christ, are you still in there?!'" ************************* Walking down the street, a man hears a voice: "Stop! If you take one more step, a brick will fall down and kill you." The man stopped; a big brick fell in front of him. The astonished man continued walking to the cross walk. The voice shouted, "Stop! If you take one more step, a car will run over you and you will die." The man stood still; a car came careening around the corner, barely missing him. "Where are you?" the man asked. "Who are you?" "I am your guardian angel," the voice answered. "Oh yeah?" the man asked. "Where the hell were you when I got married last week?" ;)
Jokes!

Merry Christmas! Q.How do blondes' braincells die? A.Alone. ____________________________ Q: What is long and hard to a blonde? A: Fourth grade ____________________________ Q: A blonde and a brunette jumped off a cliff. Who hit bottom first? A: The brunette -- the blonde had to stop and ask for directions. ____________________________ Q: How do you confuse a blonde? A: You put her in a round room and tell her to sit in a corner. Q: How does a blonde confuse you? A: She comes out and says she did. ____________________________ Q: Why can't a blonde count to 70? A: Because 69 is a bit of a mouthful. ____________________________ Q: What comes after 69? A: Mouthwash. _____________________________ Q: Why did the blonde run with the bike? A: It was going too fast for her to get on. _____________________________ Have a Happy New Year's too! ;)