The Feminist Movement has achieved all its goals, and is no longer needed, in the Western World.

1. Firstly, I have proven that through my arguments including the wage gap. Secondly, the BoP is on you to prove that feminism is no longer needed in Western society so I do not need to prove anything. My role in this debate is to disprove. 2. My opponent states that they question it and then say that they will look at this in my later arguments however this is the final round so they cannot respond to my definition of the Western World or provide an alternative. Without a definition for the term you made the mistake of allowing me to interpret the term. That is the reason why definitions are provided at the beginning of a debate - so that the challenger and voters are not confused by the resolution in any way. 3. I understand that women study in these areas more often I wasn't arguing against that. I was saying that there shouldn't be a major difference between what women study and what men study. It means that women are being taught to have different preferences to boys. This again, shows discrimination. If boys and girls were brought up exactly the same as each other then it would be unlikely that there would be major differences in job statistics - which you have proven for me with a source! Regarding stereotypes, my opponent was not specific regarding pregnancy - they just stated during the previous rounds that women take time off work unlike men. They did not state why so I assumed that they weren't being specific to pregnancy. If they were then I have no objections to that part of their argument because women taking time off work for pregnancy is understandable. It would have been easier if this was explained by my opponent in detail. 4. This wasn't really an argument - all I was saying that your arguments cannot be declared valid when statistics are involved and at that point in time it didn't make sense and I thank my opponent for providing sources in this round. Underneath my opponents argument 4 they have made a separate argument that isn't numbered so I will now respond to this. My opponent basically ends this debate with a concession of sorts. They state the following in bold: "Yes, discrimination happens, and it is impossible to stop. It will always exist. All we can do, and all that should be done, is to find a method to stop it." This basically states that we need to find a method to stop discrimination and if my opponent still remembers the resolution of this debate then they will realise that the solution to gender discrimination at the moment is feminism and although my opponent did not directly concede, what they have stated makes it easy to view this as a concession. My opponent finds it unethical to speak directly to voters. I find problems with this: a) This is my opponent's personal opinion b) There is no rule against it. c) The fact that statistics were provided without sources showed how unreliable that argument actually was. Since I am engaged in this debate I am actually checking for sources and looking through them. Voters do not always look at sources to that extent and therefore it is difficult for them to notice that. It is essential to point out a mistake as big as that. d) It required clarification and I'm sure if anyone else was in this debate (and was a decent debater) they would have asked the same thing. No sources are required here since this is for rebuttals only.