The Big Bang Theory

"A recognised christian saying that things don't just always exist is quite contradictory. Con believes that god always existed and no one created him. Why is illogical to think that the same could have happened with the Universe?" As Rabbi Mizrachi explained: "Albert Einstein proved that without an object there is no time. So with physical tings time applies and there has to be a beginning and an end. But with spirit, this does not apply, this is why when you go to sleep, your spirit separates from your body, and time no longer applies. This is why you can have a six month long dream in only 4 minutes, or a 5 second dream over 8 hours. With spirit, there is no beginning and end, time does not apply. But objects must have a beginning." G-d is a spirit, hence this law does not apply to him, plus I am more a Jew than a Christian now, we Jews use proof to establish things, not "faith." "I know must explain to Con what a force is. A force is the measure of the amount of interaction between two bodies. Nothing pulled the spec apart. What happened is that the spec had the necessary amount of energy for the little pieces of the spec to repel one another. The energy of the spec allowed the little pieces to apply forces to the other pieces, thus separating." Then how did they get pulled together in the first place if they repel each other? "Sorry to do this, but I must enter in a more complex level of science. Before the Big Bang there was no space, because space is created by energy and the energy was on the singularity. So the "spec" was held together because it hadn't nowhere else to go. Then energy appeared and space was created. And the expansion of the energy makes the expansion of the space possible, thus the expansion of the universe." So there was no space that it could go, there is many flaws with this: 1.This would mean that the universe is expanding because space is being created to allow these objects to move, by this logic, the universe is expanding because space is still being created, hence the universe is not infinite as Steven Hawking claims. 2.Energy cannot be "created" by nothing. "I'm not sure if this is totally right. However, gravity is still a weak force. If you compare gravity to the electromagnetic force you will see that the difference is of about 40 orders of magnitude. This means, if gravity is equal to 10 to the power of 18(trillions) of black holes the electromagnetic force is equal to 10 to the power of 58 black holes." From itself? How did it get together in the first place? "Con is not taking into account point of application. Gravity makes the earth hold together and the planets spinning around the sun and so on. The force that expands the universe is applied to the whole universe. Gravity is more "specific" while the force which expands the universe has to "cover" more space. This is rather complex and quite difficult to explain in a few words." Finally you offer an explanation. "Con stated that Stephen Hawking isn't credible, but without any argument. The He proceeds to state that Nikola Tesla is the smartest man to ever exist. This is obviously subjective, and Con didn't argument this opinion, which makes it worst." Nikola Tesla"s theories are all realistic and can be tested, Steven Hawking"s apply only on a chalk board. "This denotes the little to none experience of Con in Physics. If electromagnetism attracted protons and electrons the atom would collapse because of the clash of protons with electrons. Protons apply a force to the electrons called the "strong force", which prevents the collide thing. Summarizing, Protons and electrons attract each other but the strong force prevents them to collide, causing the electrons to spin around the protons." The strong force is the nuclear force. Even so, why is it attracted to neutrons? And, you know my theory, it was G-d, and I can prove it. Redshift of galaxies is wrong because you are assuming it started at a certain point, rather than a universe that was less expanded. Microwave is wrong because it"s outer space, there"s going to be radiation. Looking into the past makes no point whatsoever. Elements proportion is wrong because you cannot measure all of these elements.