9spaceking will Lose this Debate

Contention 1: Fonts. My opponent maybe using Comic Sans, but I am using Times New Roman. This is a big mistake as Times New Roman is a serrious font while Comic Sans is a joking font. This dbate isn't a really serious one as it's more of a jokingly troll debate. I'm going to lose, because I'm taking this debate too seriously while my opponenet is giving it it's proper dues with Comic Sans. Though Comic Sans may not be funny it is still more of a joke than serious giving Pro a Catch-22 in this argument showing that when he is trying to show that his font sucks is actually proving that his font suits this debate perfectly. Contention 2: Lying My opponent has changed his font, but he cannot be lying as he is telling the truth which is the Liars Paradox which is simply, "This statement is false." Which would make it true....then false....true....false...? (http://en.wikipedia.org...) This here shows that my opponent is always telling the truth and thus wouldn't lose Conduct due to this infinate loop of truth and false. Contention 3: Losing Trend My opponent claims that he is on a losing trend, but let's compare ourselves. 9space has defeated me on several occasions on this site. He is currently 2-1 against me and has even denied me entrance into the DDO Hall of Fame. (http://www.debate.org...) He is obviously better than me and will end up winning his debate. His ELO is also higher than mine by 300 points which goes to show you that he is a better debater by far and I cannot stand up to him. Contention 4: Lannan13 My opponent says that I'm good luck, but in all reality I'm really just an allagory for Queen Luna of My Little Pony.while my opponent is an allagory for Queen Celestria. ESocialBookworm is an Allagory for Twilight Sparkle. I cannot defeat the two as it has been shown several times that I, Luna, have been outcasted several times by my opponent and Twilight. Though I should control Equestria and this website, my opponent has not alloud it in Equestria and has not allowed it here as he denied my entrance into the Hall of Fame as explained in the last contention. As shown in the fallowing video I have been defeated and banished to the moon like I have been banned from mafia. () Another proof of the alagory is that I'm a ginger and ginger's steal people's souls and Luna does the same. () Contention 3.5: Errors. My opponent is actually correct that 3.5 comes both before and after 4. Why's this you may ask. We can apply the theory of Infinate Probability and we can see that it is possible that the both exist on some number line both before and after 4. We can also apply the theory of Schrottinger's Cat which states that 3.5 can be anywhere on the number line until you look for it. So for all we know we can see it after a million or a negative million. Contention 5: Yodel theory My opponent may lose his voice, but will not lose his ability to type out his arugment on the computer or cell phone which shows that my opponent can still debate. Contention 6: Gingerism I am a Ginger as shown in this picture for proof. (http://www.debate.org...) You see Ginger's are people who are evil, souless, cold-blooded freaks. Since they are souless and are an abonination and come from Hell. They say a Ginger gets a freakle for every soul he takes which means that I have done terrible things to God's people and God will punish me by having me lose this debate.See the fallowing video for how bad Gingers are. () Also since no one likes Gingers then no one would vote for me since I'm indeed a GInger making my opponent the default winner.