Evolution: Unalienable Rights, trumps, "survival of the fittest"

My opponent stated that "survival of the fittest" does not pertain to evolution before life. I believe he was incorrect with this statement, for the Big Bang (if this was the true beginning as science believes) created the first micro-organisms of life. These micro-organisms and stardust came together to form the planets, stars, and everything else in the Cosmos. Planets and stars with lives. Survival of the fittest is not always an action by choice. Survival of the fittest, as I have previously stated, can mean that the elements of nature are on the organisms side. Planets formed because the elements of nature was on their side to bring the specks of stardust together to form that planet. Life is a constant battle with mother nature for any organism or species. The ones that play her game and win are the fit ones that survive. (. http://www.bbc.co.uk...) Flow, as my opponent mentioned, is the game. We are constantly a part of the game of Life (think of the board game for this purpose). The ones that have the luck of nature to land on the winning spaces earn the money. Money makes them fitter in the society and fitter to win the game. Therefore, the wealthiest (or the fittest to win) has won. In his next argument on "survival of the weakest," my opponent again took the phrase "survival of the fittest" too literally. There are always those exception cases, but we are looking at which phrase most accurately portrays our evolution. If we look back on our human history, "survival of the fittest" is constantly the drive for life. We can look back on empire upon empire. Early life and civilizations were all about who could keep growing and keep their legacy alive. We still see that idealism today. There are exception cases as well for my opponent's phrase. What about the city-state of Sparta? The state that thought a robotic, military society was the key to existence. They spent years hammering that freedom (or "Liberty") into their brains. Yet today we remember those 300 Spartans who were heroes. They helped Ancient Greece fight against the Persians to eventually claim victory. I now want to address my opponent's point on how it is immoral to kill life for food. Unfortunately, we all kill life for food. Even vegans are killing life for food because a plant is just as much of a life as an animal. We just don't think of as so. We think of the plant as less fit for life. So even vegans target the weakest. It is all in our struggle to keep the species evolving and reproducing. We (again) are just lucky to have such easy access (for the most part) to the food we need because we are at the top of the food chain. My opponent said that companies should be looking to make the customer happy. You may read in the link below some of the strategies companies use. While they are striving for these goals, this is all in part to stay on top of the market. If they are not satisfying their customers, they become weaker and weaker until they eventually die out (meaning go bankrupt). Therefore, those that satisfy the customers are the fittest and are able to stay profitable. As helpful as a company might seem, remember that in the end of the day, it is all a tactic to stay in business and make that profit. (. http://www.isharad.com...) My opponent even brought our argument to the voter experience level. Yes, we want to satisfy the voters. But aren't we just trying to look the most "fit" to voter opinions? Aren't we trying to be the one coming out of top? Aren't we only exercising "survival of the fittest" as we speak? As I wrap up my case, I just want to leave a few thoughts with the voters. First of all, my opponent made a very strong case, so he deserves much respect. Second of all, his case was strong, but he never fully proved to me how his phrase could pertain to all life. And finally, "survival of the fittest" is a very broad phrase as I hope you have taken away from my case. Whether it be in the sense of striving to be the best, having the luck of the draw in mother nature's game, or struggling to keep the species alive, "survival of the fittest" accurately portrays all of evolution. Thank you, Pro, for a wonderful debate, and thank you voters, for sticking with us until the end (yes, those of you that have read all this way). Thanks! :)