war

1 The Con"s cries to prevent their impacts is a false front provided by the Empire to terrify the subordinated into submission- that was Hardt and Negri 17 The impacts that they present are greatly over exaggerated. They want their impacts to seem big and that only the Empire is able to solve them They are trying to create a world where the Multitude is completely dependent on the Empire and they do that through morality The Con uses morality to justify its intervention to suppress those who threaten the Empire Wood in 2002 writes Moral intervention often serves as the first act that prepares the stage for military intervention. More often it is dictated unilaterally by the United States. Which charges itself with the primary Empire. These enemies are most often called terrorist, A crude conceptual and terminological reduction that is rooted in a police mentality Which military intervention is what they claim to solve for in the first place this turns their claims They only use morality as a false front. They only pretend to care about their impacts when in reality the only thing that that they care about is the ability to control others" lives Then there is the topic specific link I called to reject the Con and cause a nuclear war they concede that you should reject them because they promote the Empire This will kill the Empire Cross Apply the last Caldwell in 10 evidence from the 1st round that talks about how Unlike previous history economics won"t continue to be the "driver" of progress. Industrialization would be solved. It"s science. Dr Caldwell writes in 2014 The preceding chapter showed that a low-level nuclear attack can destroy a very large proportion of the world"s city population. This chapter examines what is left, After such an attack. The purpose of this chapter is to impart a sense of the level of destruction of the global economic system. To that end, It examines the damage to the major world countries, And summarizes the damage to each country. The list includes total number of cities, Total city population, The number of cities targeted under each attack, And the proportion of the city population destroyed under each attack (amount and percentage). MINIMAL REGRET POPULATION DOES NOT INCLUDE THE EMPIRE, ENDS ALL WAR, POVERTY, FAMINE & PLAGUES Caldwell writes in 2003 In the synarchic minimal-regret population, There is no global poverty and no global war. There is no global disease: the risk of a planetary epidemic is minimized. There is no global famine. The scourges of civilization " plague, Famine, And war " are eliminated. Impact level The Con acts as the police force of a regime that allows capitalist domination and biopower to become transcendent, Reaching throughout the totality of society. -Hardt and Negri 2k When you allow the Empire to solve for impacts they get to now control those individuals lives. That is the only reason that the con is calling for the prevention of their Impacts That was the Morality and false front links 2 OVERVIEW Biosphere collapse is inevitable " The Empire continues to pillage the planet and one way or the other we are going to destroy it- my Barry in 15 evidence is very specific to this. The only way that we can attempt to get rid of our current mindset in relation to the environment and war is to have a minimal regret strategy- to have a nuclear war. This will destroy the Empire The only way we have a chance of surviving is to start an all our nuclear war! This is our Caldwell 10 evidence that calls for an all our nuclear war because it is the only way we can ever shift our consciousness. This shift in consciousness will "Create a world beyond the dichotomy of war" meaning that this will indeed be the war to end all wars and ending the Empire with it. This means I solve the prevention of war better than the Con We only need to win four things. 1. In the world of the con we are all dead from the impending biosphere collapse. 2. The nuclear war stops the biosphere from collapsing. 3. Some form of life will continue to exist on Earth. 4. That life will have a peaceful mindset which stops error replication. Biosphere Collapse A. Extend Barry in 15. Biosphere collapse is inevitable for three reasons, Inequality, Resource depletion, Overpopulation. B. Look the Con says that they don"t want to cause a nuclear holocaust but drops that the biosphere is going to collapse which means that you must vote Pro to cause a nuclear war that stops the biosphere from collapsing Nuclear war solves A. The only way that the world will be saved is through nuclear exchange, Faster the better " that"s Caldwell in 10 B. Cross apply the Caldwell in 14 card from the Empire debate that shows how the nuclear war will solve for the biosphere collapse because industrialization is taken out. C. This means that the nuclear war would take out the Empire because it will take out industrialized area"s where the Empire is located D. The nuclear war Solves Future Generations Dr. Caldwell writes in 2014 Although a minimal-regret nuclear war may kill almost six billion people, That must be balanced against the very real possibility that not having such a war may not only result in the deaths of six billion people, But also the extinction of all other species on the planet If the Earth can support ten million people indefinitely, That represents forty quadrillion person-years of life. Is that amount of human life inconsequential compared to the lives of the mere six billion that occupy the planet today? Survivability Life will continue post nuclear war " that"s Newsweek 18 They don"t provide a reason as to why we don"t survive Mindset Shift Extend Caldwell in 10 from the mindset shift debate from the 1st round. The nuclear war acts as a new method of thinking that stops future industrialized activities. Cross apply the Caldwell in 03 from the Empire debate that talks about how mindsets that allowed the spark to happen in the first place won"t be present in the minimal regret population A. Biodiversity collapse is the largest impact in the round. In a world of extinction no other impact matters. Life is a pre-requisite to other impacts and the focus of stopping the collapse and the Empire is the only impact that matters. B. Nuke first, Ethics and morals later. Nukes must preclude. Also any reason why they say this is immoral or wrong is just a link to Empire they are throwing out all stops to try and prevent the Nuclear war from occurring the Empire is doomed it the spark happens and they know it. Dr Caldwell writes in 2014 The adopted approach does not preclude those higher goals, But it does address the fact that if the planet is destroyed, Then the achievement of those higher goals may be impossible. The adopted approach are necessary for the achievement of higher goals. C. The Pro is the only side that guarantees future generations, Outweighs the Con, Cross apply future generations D. The con tries to outweigh on magnitude but forgets that their impacts are inevitable in the world of the Empire. The Role of the Judge is to choose the vision for the world that extends opportunity for Empire free future generations, Not steal it away for short term gratification. This means that even if the aff can leverage they solve biosphere collapse but the nuclear war is still justified as a way to destroy the Empire Caldwell in 14 writes In the long run, As Keynes noted, We are all dead. In the long run, Our sun runs out of fuel and the biological life of our solar system dies. In the short run, However, Things do matter. Life is not without meaning and purpose, But you must define the meaning and purpose. Your life will be defined by the stands that you take. This planet can support human society and nature for a few more years, Or it can support human society and nature for several billion years more. The choice is ours.