The USFG should substantially increase social services for persons living in poverty

For Space sake i will only post the Tagline and source along with a warrant if it is short enough. If you truelly do not believe the tag, ask for the warrant in CX. Lets roll PLAN: THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD REMOVE MEDICAID REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND ELIGIBILITY RESTRICTIONS ON UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRANTS WHO HAVE BEEN IN THE COUNTRY FOR LESS THAN FIVE YEARS. CONTENTION ONE: THE ALIEN A) UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAID COVERAGE. KU 8 (LEIGHTON, PROFESSOR OF HEALTH POLICY AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES) B)DENYING HEALTH CARE TO IMMIGRANTS AUTHORIZES XENOPHOBIC VIOLENCE—THIS PROVIDES AN OPENING TO CONTEST THE VIOLENT BOUNDARIES BETWEEN HOST AND GUEST. Dikeï¿½ 02 (Mustafa, Lecturer in Human Geography in the Geography Department at Royal Holloway, University of London, Pera Peras Poros: Longing for Spaces of Hospitality C)THE WELFARE REFORM ACT STIGMATIZES IMMIGRANTS. IT PERPETUATES THE BELIEF THAT NONCITIZENS ARE INFERIOR. CHALLENGING THIS ACT OF DISCRIMINATION IS VITAL TO CONTEST ALL OTHER FORMS OF XENOPHOBIA AND PERSECUTION HULL 97 (ELIZABETH, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR AT RUTGERS, 33 GONZ. L. REV. 471) D)OUR SOCIETY'S XENOPHOBIC FEAR OF IMMIGRANTS STEMS FROM A DESIRE TO CONSTRUCT IMAGINARY BOUNDARIES BETWEEN "US" AND "THEM"- THIS CONSTRUCTION IS AT THE ROOT OF THE HOLOCAUST COLE 6 (PHILLIP, READER IN APPLIED PHILOSOPHY AT MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY, THE MYTH OF EVIL: DEMONIZING THE ENEMY, P. 206) E)FEDERAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS CHILL IMMIGRANT PARTICIPATION IN HEALTH CARE—REPEALING THESE LAWS IS ESSENTIAL. PARK 4 (SEAM, J.D. CANIDATE AT FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW IN MAY 2005, "NOTE: SUBSTANTIAL BARRIERS IN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT ACCESS TO PUBLICLY-FUNDED HEALTH CARE: REASONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGE", SPRING, LEXIS) F) THE DEMAND TO KNOW THE OTHER'S IDENTITY IMPLIES A CONDITIONAL WELCOMING THAT SUSTAINS THE SOVEREIGN DIVISION BETWEEN CITIZEN AND ALIEN Yegenoglu 03 (Meyda, Department of Sociology @ Middle East Technical University, "Liberal Multiculturalism and the Ethics of Hospitality in the Age of Globalization," Postmodern Culture 13.2, muse) G) PROVIDING HEALTH SERVICES TO UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS IS CRUCIAL TO AFFIRM HEALTH AS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT- WE MUST FIRST ACCEPT IMMIGRANTS AS HUMAN BEINGS TO MAKE MEANINGFUL CHANGE ORTEGA 9 (ADRIANNE, J.D. BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, M.P.H. BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 35 AM. J. L. AND MED. 185) H) HEALTHCARE IS AN ESSENTIAL BUILDING BLOCK OF OUR SOCIETY. THE DENIAL OF HEALTHCARE TO MILLIONS OF CITIZENS HAS TURNED THE AMERICAN DREAM INTO NOTHING MORE THAN A PIPE DREAM. PLACE 99 (MICHAEL D., PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE CATHOLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES, "HEALTH CARE AS AN ESSENTIAL BUILDING BLOCK FOR A FREE SOCIETY: THE CONVERGENCE OF THE CATHOLIC AND SECULAR AMERICAN IMPERATIVE", 1999, PROJECT MUSE) I) (This is solvency) WE MUST EMBRACE AN ETHIC OF UNCONDITIONAL HOSPITALITY IN OPPOSITION TO CALCULATIONS- WE KNOW THAT ACHIEVING TRUE HOSPITALITY IS IMPOSSIBLE, BUT THE ASPIRATION ITSELF BRINGS US CLOSER TO THE OTHER. TRUE JUSTICE MUST SIMULTANEOUSLY STAND OUTSIDE AND WITHIN THE LAW. THE ROLE OF THE BALLOT IS IDEAL FORMATION – A PROMISE OF JUSTICE TO COME. THE ETHICAL DEMAND STEMS FROM THIS PROMISE, NOT FROM ITS FULFILLMENT THROUGH SIMULATED ENACTMENT OF A POLICY. DOTY 6 (ROXANNE LYNN, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY TEMPE, ARIZONA, "FRONTERAS COMPASIVAS AND THE ETHICS OF UNCONDITIONAL HOSPITALITY", MILLENIUM- JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 2006; 35; 53, HTTP://MIL.SAGEPUB.COM...) J) WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO UNCONDTIONALLY EMBRACE THE IMMIGRANT OTHER, WHICH MEANS EMBRACING THE VULNERABILITY INHERENT IN THEIR DISADVANTAGES. WE MUST TRANSCEND THE TRAP OF XENOPHOBIC POLITICS THAT SEEK TO LIMIT IMMIGRATION IN ORDER TO OVERCOME OUR STIGMATIZATION OF IMMIGRANTS. DERRIDA 1 (JACQUES, PROFESSOR OF HUMANITIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE, "A DISCUSSION WITH JACQUES DERRIDA", THEORY & EVENT, VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1, 2001, PROJECT MUSE) K) THE LAW IS PERFECTABLE. IT WORKS TOWARDS PERFECTION WITHOUT EVER ACHIEVING IT AND THUS EXPRESSES A USEFUL, IF IMPOSSIBLE, IDEAL. WE UNDERSTAND THAT EVERY COUNTRY WON'T OPEN THEIR DOORS UNCONDITIONALLY TO THE OTHER, AND WE DON'T THINK THAT WE SHOULD UNDERGO A POLICY SIMULATION, BUT WE SHOULD, THROUGH THIS SPEECH ACT, EMBODY THE IDEA OF PURE HOSPITALITY DERRIDA 1 (JACQUES, PROFESSOR OF HUMANITIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE, "A DISCUSSION WITH JACQUES DERRIDA", THEORY & EVENT, VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1, 2001,PROJECT MUSE) L) SHORT-TERM POLITICAL CALCULATIONS ARE AN EXCUSE TO IGNORE THE RIGHT TO UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE- WE SHOULD EMBRACE HUMAN RIGHTS TO TRANSCEND THE TRAP OF POLITICAL INACTION RUDIGER 8 (ANJA, HUMAN RIGHT TO HEALTH PROGRAM DIRECTOR FOR A JOINT PROGRAM RUN BY NESRI AND THE NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM, "A HUMAN RIGHTS ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEES' HEALTH PLANS", AUGUST 2008, HTTP://WWW.HEALTHLAW.ORG...) M) PUBLIC DEBATE IS A CRUCIAL FORUM TO CONTEST RACIST POLITICAL DISCOURSE—FAILURE TO DO SO SHAPES PUBLIC OPINION IN A WAY THAT AUTHORIZES XENOPHOBIC VIOLENCE AND PARALYZES RIGHTS MOVEMENTS HEAD 5 (MICHAEL, CHAIR OF EUROPEAN COMMISSION AGAINST RACISM AND INTOLERANCE, HTTP://WWW.COE.INT... Contention 2) Framework 1.Our framework is that you evaluate the affirmative against a competitive policy option or the status quo. 2.Prefer our framework because: a.Predictability: the realm of policy is the most predictable for policy debate. Don't let the negative read utopian alternatives. b.Fairness: the AFF get 8 minutes of offense against the status quo. The neg shouldn't be able to read 8 minutes of a Kritik that ignores the entirety of the 1AC. c.Reciprocity: The AFF are tied down the resolution, the negative should be tied to policy. 3.Plan Focus is Good a.Topic specific education – we don't have the same generic debates every single year b.Stable negative ground – the AFF are tied down to defending certain links 4.They have no offense - Policy education and rational decision making can't be obtained from anything but debate, so prefer our framework for debate 5.Policy debate should preclude critical discourse for the following reasons: a.It's more Real World: When we want to implement policies, we know how policies work. b.Education: We increase education about political policies and effects that are occurring in the world. So basically the Neg needs to provide the best policy option in the round or i win. Open for CX, goodluck. (I dont mind K's if you wanna run them)