All women should be given free large breast enhancements by the government

Since he has dropped it, I assume he agrees with my parameters/definitions now. My arguments1. NZ women would look bad - NZ women would care, and probably retaliate with a few targetted assasinations. Since Americans are, on average, stupider than NZders (. http://talk.collegeconfidential.com...) the American women would fall easily to our cunning traps. As a result, you'd care because there'd be a shortage of women in your country.2. Women already hot - My opponent has done nothing to rebut the claim that Denise is representative of all females already, including Americans. Under the status quo girls are sexy everywhere. Denise is an American citizen, and was from the Czech Republic, not Italy. Further proof my opponent is a liar.3a. 15/yos suicide - it is NORMAL for 15/yos to want to have sex. Starting puberty at 13ish doesn't make you worthy of death as pro asserts. Life, liberty and pursuing happiness would thus be destroyed under my opponent's model.3b. 15/yos lie about age - . .. and forge birth certificates. If they can forge driver's licenses, they can forge certificates too. Except in Alabama. There you don't need to forge anything.3c. Girls less experienced - guys will care as they'd be used to doing it with older girls, thus being disappointed at the young ones and causing big generation gaps.3d+e. Boys rape (grand)mothers - I agree this is sick, but it WILL happen under your model. Can young boys really be trusted? My model will give them a good reason not to do these immoral acts. The presence of EVERYONE ELSE may up the challenge factor for the boys, making it a sort of "forbidden fruit" (only you'd make the fruit sweet and juicy, I'd keep it old and stale). Face it - God made old boobs ugly for a reason.3f. Less rape of underage girls - my opponent seems to conceed this.4. Too much masterbation - my opponent lies again - you can't sleep-masterbate, or masterbate while doing two-handed press-ups, so it's a lie to say men can do anything simultaneously. Masterbation requires concentration, which will be distracted from other stuff, like when people's bills are due. Second, tube socks and tissues are already near-capacity at present. We may just run out of trees and cotton if more masterbation happens, reaching a critical mass of semen that will cause a world-wide, unending tsunami of sperm.5. Apocalypse - no, the apocalypse will destroy all humanity, not just the Christians. In fact, according to a book I once read, the non-Christians have it particulary hard (and not in the way you're thinking of) in the apocalypse. My modelMy opponent asks if I'm out of my mind. Yes, I'll be back in tomorrow. He also says guys have enough to deal with. I agree- that's why they need breasts so they can relax a bit. Besides, having breasts will help them deal with issues like sexual insecurity. Next he claims guys would find women intolerable. That's not true, women will make more of an effort to make themselves tolerable to guys. It will be an incentive for women to work harder towards pleasing men, and men will in turn respond by not just rubbing themselves all the time and hanging out with girls instead. This will be good for both girls and boys. My opponent makes NO attempt to refute my twelve arguments in favor of my model. This shows a lack of respect, as I rebutted all 28 of his arguments, which is very poor conduct. On the balance of evidence, it seems that since my opponent has conceeded 100% of the arguments I made on this point, my model must be accepted as superior. After defending his points he adds guys are easily distracted, but in fact POSSUM! I mean . .. guys would be desensitied to breasts if they had them, minimising the distraction factor. He adds it will create gender inequality, but how unequal is the status quo! ? Women get all the boobs to themselves (well, some fat guys have them, but they're not really people). For equality, we need equal cleavage, and for that, we need boobs. Rebuttal1. Gene pool - no, we must respect natural selection. This is because natural breasts are just so much better than artificial ones.2. Hotness scale - dropped by my opponent.3. CPR fun - Point 3 wasn't about sex, that was point 4. Point 3 was about the actual act of CPR, which my opponent does not rebut.4. Post-CPR sex - As I said last round, old porn stars aren't crusty as Satan preserves them for his special occasions. Besides, Madonna's pretty hot . .. . http://www.inquisitr.com...5. Crowded elevators - my opponent restates the mantra that women take forever to go anywhere. That's what the women want you to think. They want to hide their powers so they can drive men insane so that can get divorced so they can have as many guys as possible, maximising their reproductive chances. If you don't believe me, all the actors on the Harry Potter films are in fact secretly female. Their powers are well-documented there.6. Elaboration on (1), dropped.7. More bra shopping - my opponent admits bra shopping wouldn't happen under his model, so basically conceeded.8. No point to sex industry - Russian immigrants would stop doing degrading work like pole dancing and move on to more respectable professions like street cleaning. The only reason Russian girls have been doing it up to now is their marginal cup size advantage, an advantage they would lose. For the same reason, one can expect Russian girls to do a LOT less immigration to the US under your model.9. Curve-fitting attire - dropped.10. Tourism - you wouldn't travel to Asia to observe men's privates, you'd go to buy cheap laptops and practice Karate. Nobody wants to go somewhere where everybody's hotter than them, but in Asia, you can ignore sex for a while and concentrate on the money you're saving/the people you can later beat up.11. Illegals - dropped.12. TV reporters hotter - dropped.13. Music videos hotter - dropped.14. Beach funner - dropped.15. Prom dates hotter - Stop wanting to kill people or I'll tell Kofi Annan that you're being naughty, and then you won't get any Christmas presents. The point about indecent exposure being encouraged under your plan (who wouldn't expose themselves to a girl with DD boobs at a prom) remains unrebutted.16. Stalkers hotter - I just asked a stalker, as requested. They told me they stalk because they have AIDS, as expected. Told you so.17. Televised jogging - dropped.18. Neighbours hotter - they might not give you AIDS, but stalking will.19. Pillow boobs - dropped.20. Closer wet T-shirt contests - dropped.21. College sorority car washes - if that's what it's like under the status quo, how come you're unsatisfied? Those girls look like they'd do a pretty good job (in more ways than one). I think bigger boobs would thus generate diminishing returns.22. Game shows hotter - dropped.23. Women catfights - pro wants to get knocked out by boobs. This is dangerous - imagine the lack of troll debates if Imabench was to get concussed. I suggest DDO start an action committee to talk him out of it. Catfights generally are bad and bitchy - and they'd be discouraged under my model (because of the ability to counterattack) and encouraged by my opponent (because of the extra damage each breast would cause).24. Gomez vs Obama - Pro has BOP. It's not enough to assert one is better - pro has to prove why one is better than the other.25. LDF vs Kony - Same as 24.26. Jennifer Lopez serious - dropped.27. Movies hotter - dropped (all of them).28. Female occupations hotter - dropped (all of them). My Extra Argument(TM) - dropped. ConclusionJust like we don't let only one gender drive cars, we should not let only one gender dominate breast-ownership. My opponent has failed to make half his points as I showed last round, dropped half of the remainder in this round, and completely failed to rebut my arguments for my counter-model. I look forward to summarising my case next round.