Abortion is a woman's right

Thanks to Andromeda_Z for her intriguing opening arguments and rebuttals.Pro Case:1. I agree that a human's body is their own property. My opponent opens with an analogy meant to compare trespassing with an unwanted pregnancy and an unwanted trespasser (the homeless person) with a fetus in utero. I shall cover lightly the few criticisms I have of this analogy.Firstly, the analogy assumes that you are responsible for the homeless person occupying your home. You are not, for obvious reasons. Firstly, the owner of the house is not responsible for the trespasser. In other words, the owner of the house DID NOT cause the trespasser to appear there, the homeless person did. In pregnancy through consensual sex (as I'm sure my opponent understands), two parents jointly commit themselves to the action of intercourse and they are aware that a zygote (and later, a fetus) will be created because of their actions. My second problem with this is that it assumes that killing is an appropriate response to someone trespassing on your property. I wouldn't go as far as saying that. If someone comes onto your property and attempts to use your resources, then your response should only be to kill them if they pose an imminent threat to your life i.e. self-defense. I'm sure my opponent agrees with this. If not, then I can expound upon the doctrine of reasonable self-defense later.2. My opponent's second argument revolves around whether or not abortion should be a legal right, I shall cover this lightly.She states that abortion is not a matter or morality, but of public health. Now, my problem with this is that, abortion is a matter of morality. It involves a living human organism (a z/e/f), which, as I argued before, still subject to moral reasoning and argumentation. Something that IS a matter of morality is something that can be argued for using arguments that revolve around morality. Something that IS a matter of morality is something that can be argued to be moral or immoral, which I did on my opening round. I also agree that everyone has the right to pursue health, but not absolutely. A woman shouldn't be permitted to pursue or enhance her own health at someone else's expense or in a manner that would grossly violate someone else's rights. As I've argued before, abortion comes at the expense of the fetus' life and the fetus' future. My opponent's argument also has gross implications. If we are simply making laws towards things that won't happen anyway, then we can't legislate upon things that will happen regardless i.e. theft, rape, murder, etc. All of these things will continue to happen even if the law bars it. We can see from this that the fact that it will just happen anyway is a weak argument in favor of making abortion legally available. Secondly, my opponent argues that legal abortion is favorable to illegal abortion because it is safer and because illegal abortions leads to back-alley abortions. And, yet she gives no statistics or arguments in favor of her claim that the risk of illegal abortion is concerning enough so that abortion should be made legally permissible. Con Case:FLO Argument My opponent agrees that abortion denies a human being of a future, but drops the other part of my argument that because it denies a human being a future, then it is immoral. So, essentially she has conceded this point. She argues that my own argument has defeated my position because not aborting causes a woman to lose a meaningful future. My problem with this is that what my opponent is arguing is fundamentally different from what I said. In abortion, a being's life is ended, they have no chance at a future, that's it, nothing, it's gone forever. If a woman carries a pregnancy to term, then she isn't necessarily denied a future. A future means all of the experiences a human has in their future, good and bad. A woman can always give a child up for adoption so that her future would become more positive and not be ruined by an unwanted child. Abortion absolutely denies one a meaningful future. Carrying a pregnancy to term does not. This is why my opponent's argument fails. Thank you.