domestico violence against women should prevented by addressing male's psychological attitude

I didn't think I would have to in order to win, but apparently I may, in fact, need to rebut pro's Round 2 argument in order to win. I am not going to take the risk of not rebutting. I will now rebut pro's text wall of a Round 2 argument. "First of all I would like to reply by asserting that I have never heard of a men killed by his female partner! !! ! "A lot of media outlets tend to turn a blind eye to abuse against men. But I guarantee you it has happened. "The aim of this debate is to establish which is the best way to struggle the domestic violence against women"I can tell you that is not by addressing men's psychological attitude, since man (gender) has no psychological attitude that causes them to be abusive. To win this debate, pro must prove that there is a psychological attitude in men only, to win this debate. If I prove that the attitude is present in females as well, then it is not a psychological attitude in men, it is an attitude in the bad people who abuse. "The statistics should be interpreted and analyzed in depth. It"s true that some studies have reported that violence against men is as prevalent as violence towards women, but data coming out from courts, police, divorce records, emergency room demonstrate that the domestic violence usually recognize man as aggressor toward female. "That is due to men being too concerned about their self-esteem and what kind of reception from the public they would get if they admitted to being beat by their wives. Also, if anything, studies are more reliable than the reports! Remember, reports only have the statistics on reported cases. Meanwhile, studies have statistics on BOTH the reported and the unreported cases. It's simple. First, the people who conduct the studies get reported statistics from the reports. Then , they cast their nets out to ones that aren't reported, such as the people who are too afraid to actually go out to court and are more safe admitting to being abused to an online study. They then compile all of that into a study. Thus, studies are more reliable. "Few efforts have been done to prevent the abuses. "Really? How about all of the hotlines for this stuff? Or law enforcement? "As noted by a group of leading experts in marital violence in their 1992 published report entitled "The Myth of Sexual Symmetry in Marital Violence," what those who argue that men are reluctant or ashamed to report their wives" assault because of shame or chivalry overlook is that women have their own reasons to be reticent, fearing the loss of a jailed or alienated husband"s economic support as well as his vengeance. "True, but men also refuse to report for those same reasons (jailed spouse, loss of economic support, fear of vengeance) as well. "Moreover, enormous differences in meaning and consequences exist between a woman "pummelling" her laughing husband in an attempt to convey strong feelings and a man "pummelling" his weeping wife in an attempt to punish her for not doing what he wants. In addition, men are usually larger in size than women, and the most frequent reason for violence reported by women is self-defense. "First off, men are not like that when being abused, except in movies. Husbands are unrightfully punished by their spouses as well. And yes, men are in larger size then women, but does that mean we should turn a blind eye to violence against men? Certainly not! For arguments like that (that they are bigger, they can handle it) are the reason why men are so concerned about their self-esteem when being abused by their wives, and won't report it! THE HEEL STOMPI stated in the comments section that I have a Trump card up my sleeve. Here it is. . http://www.telegraph.co.uk... A recent study shows that women are more likely to be controlling and abusive than men! I would not call that a psychological trait in women, rather I would call that a trait in bad people. Also, if you Google "domestic violence against men", you will find that all of the domestic violence experts in the articles related to the search aknowledge that abuse is a two-way street between male and female. Also, my opponent has not refuted my Round 2 argument. Now to rebut your Round 3 argument. You didn't even argue, you just stated that I missed the point. I did not miss the point, as you can see from my Round 3 argument in the third paragraph. Thank you for this debate. Over and out.