Right Wing Governments, In General, Are Less Moral Than Left Wing Governments

Argument I: Right-Winged Governments v Left-Winged Governments.Pro is still saying that because Nazi Germany had slaves, that Slave is a Right-Winged-only issue. No, North Korea even has slaves (the people in the 3 Generations of Punishment). One would argue that everyone in the USSR and China a decade or two back were slaves. Most countries have had slavery in their time. The fact that Slavery mostly ended before the concept of Left and Right Governments came into creation is why you won't see many examples.Pro's argument is false cause and Correlation, assuming that because some bad examples of Right-Winged Governments had slavery, it was a Right-Wing thing. Every type pf Government is capable of slavery. Nazi Germany being an example. After doing some research, I came to remember something the the Nazis. The word Nazi means Nationalsozialismus, or National Socialism (1). Nazism, is a Left-Winged to Central-Winged government, explaining the hatred Hitler had for Far-Right winged Fascism. Nazism is a form of Socialism (2).Now that I see which source Pro was connecting to the prior quote, I can reply better. Pro is misreading the purpose of the source. I didn't use it to compare Hitler and Stalin, as he assumes. I used it to show the crimes Stalin committed. The mention of Hitler was only side information not relevant to the conversation. Hitler may have killed more, but that doesn't mean Stalin is suddenly a better person/Pro still never addressed my argument about Far-Left groups being responsible for 100 million deaths between China and Russia alone.1) http://en.wikipedia.org...2) http://www.americannaziparty.com...Argument II: Relative Morality.North Korea and Nazi Germany is a sign that Left-Winged governments can be worse. Pro conceded that Left-Winged governments can be equal, of course from his perspective. Which is more immoral depends on the reader. A modern day fascist would still consider Left-Wings governments as more immoral. There isn't reason to assume, objectively, that one is worse than the other.Just because the Nazi's were allied with the Soviet doesn't mean they liked each other. Hitler and Stalin hated each other (3). Remember that Hitler invaded Stalin, and had been planning to long before becoming allies. As for what people consider the worst thing human's could do, many would consider rape more immoral than Genocide.3) http://alphahistory.com...Rebuttal III: The Immorality of any Government.The KKK is indeed a terrorist group... I never denied that the Right has Terrorists as well, but it doesn't fix the issue my Argument causes for Pro... Far-Left groups are responsible for the second largest percent of terrorist attacks, behind Latinos. Far-Right groups do not even show up on the scale (4) In general, Left-Wing groups are more likely to commit terror.I did comment on South Africa or Guatemala: "Pro tries to prove that Right-Wings governments are more immoral than Left-Winged governments by showing examples of how they, like any group, can be bad. However, his examples are cherry-picked and even include issues that aren't Right-Winged." I commented on them all as a group. Pro tackled Russia, but not every part of my argument regarding them. He still never attacked the 100 million people claim.Pro brings up that Left-Winged governments tended to overtake Right-Winged governments. This doesn't prove it's better, in fact, Fascism overtook Italy's prior government, was it the better of two evils? History shows that these nations were not better off after being took over, including China, Russia, and Cuba, as well as North Korea and Vietnam. Russia and China is only doing better because of their continous adaption of Free-Market Capitalism, a Right-Winged philosphy. Most Left-Winged governments have since been overthrown.4) http://www.loonwatch.com...Conclusion: Left-Winged governments can be just as bad as Right-Winged governments. Which ever one is, in general, worse, depends entirely on the beholder.