Anarchism will lead to our eventual demise

Before I begin my arguments, I would like to clarify that this is not a debate whether or not anarchism will be universally adopted, but rather if it was universally adopted whether it would be "bad" or "good" for our society. I will put a reason below dealing with it being accepted, but I do not want the debate to be focused on this. I will be debating on the premise that if it was more widely accepted, what it would do to society, and like I said in round one, whether or not it would benefit society. Anarchism seems to labor under the fact that we will all get along and trust each other. This works against human nature. Since the beginning of time, we having cheated and stolen. Biblically, since Adam and Eve took the fruit from the tree and Cain killed Abel from jealousy. But humans were first built to acknowledge the "concept of property and rightful control," unlike bacteria, per say would. Humans have never got along in history, ever, so this is the first sign that anarchism is "bad." It tries to put everyone on the same level. This would mean only one middle-class, upper-class, or lower-class. Some of them say it is unfair that people are born with disabilities and want to change that. There are many problems with this. Say anarchists should find a way to make everyone equal. If no one had any diseases or disabilities, people would have no appreciation for what they have. Most people strive for the best. But if everyone were on the same level, then they would have nothing to strive for, not the highest job, nothing. People would not work as hard and our society would become indefinitely lazier. There would be no "good" if everyone were good. There would be no "beauty" if everyone were beautiful. We need changes. And there must be different classes, because there will always be people who overachieve and underachieve, and if that is taken away, this would mean that the government would completely level out the money, and again, there wouldn't be anything to work towards. Complete chaos The situations above would be the best-case scenarios of the results of anarchism. This (below) would be more realistic, according to human nature. If there was no government, and no money made and distributed, no one would work. Then they wouldn't be able to get necessities, such as food or water. The people who did have large amounts aren't going to give it to them, obviously. So what happens? Fighting would ensue. And being that there are no laws and punishments for murder, violence would be horrendous. We would most likely end up killing ourselves, realistically. Government is needed, and has been for centuries. Illusions Here I will give a reason on why anarchism could be more widely accepted in the years to come. The youth of today have most likely heard their parents talking badly about the government at one time or another. So they come to the conclusion that the government is wrong and it is "cool" to be against it and have no government. I'm in no way saying that government is perfect, or that they haven't done things that they shouldn't have, but we should just have less government, not have no government at all. And older kids, teens, just want something to rebel about. Again, the "cool" factor. "Rebelling against tyranny is usually noble. Rebelling against consensus democracy is usually juvenile." Sources: http://mwillett.org... http://critical-thinker.net... http://www.dinimizislam.com... http://josephbales.com...