My opponent is a Christian proselytizer.

Let me define the terms. prosï¿½eï¿½lyï¿½tizeï¿½ verb- To induce someone to convert to one's faith. . http://www.merriam-webster.com... Chrisï¿½tian adjective- A person who believes in Jesus Christ; adherent of Christianity. . http://www.merriam-webster.com... My first contention that my opponent is merely a Christian proselytizer is his use of inconsistent and illogical arguments from his previous debates that are similar to those of other proselytizers rather than debaters. One example of his illogically created arguments is his "Santa/Satan" argument that he constantly copies and pastes n his debates, which is usually used out of context. Here is an example of it. . http://www.debate.org... "As a child you believe in Santa Claus? Most children do. You enjoyed the fact that Santa was a cheerful man, who deserved to give gifts to your children. (If you are a parent you get no credit for Christmas when you have young children as Santa does all the work) You as a Child are born enjoying Christmas every year believe that Santa will come into your house (If Santa was to visit ever house in one night, He would have to spend a 1 millionth of a second at each house) Moving that fast is supernatural. Like the devil who hides, it would be impossible for the eye to see Santa as your eye can only see a maximum of a 20th of a second. So Santa is the devils way for bring in the children into the Physical world (mentioned in my other debate, "Randomness is a lack of knowledge in the Spiritual and Physical world") As a Child the Devil acts like the child is in control by doing nothing on Christmas and the devil (now known to me as Santa) has the burden of running about after presents. When you Grow older you become the devils slave as you do not believe in Santa and therefore the devil anymore. Making your life style converted by physical not spiritual beliefs. And now as a adult with money "You can not serve two masters, money and God. " is more avaible, again more involved in the physical world. So now the burden is on you to run into shops buying gifts you are now the devils slave who has seemed to have disappeared as quickly as Santa did. " More or less, my opponent argues that Santa is Satan and that as an adult you serve both money and God, making many logical fallacies in the above statement. My second contention is his constant plea for us to get saved that he uses when debating and when commenting on debates. Here are a few examples of this obvious proselytizing. . http://www.debate.org... The last sentence in his first round and his entire second round is merely the gab that most evangelical and proselytizing Christians use to "convert" the "heathens" that exist in the world. Other Examples . http://www.debate.org... 1st and 2nd comment . http://www.debate.org... Last sentence in first round and last round . http://www.debate.org... Again first comment. The statements in general do not really offer any substance, or reason other than the threat of hellfire (which can be debated on). The last statements also presents a sort of Catch 22: if you vote for GodSands, he wins the actual debate, but if you do not vote for GodSands, he wins because he told you not to vote for him and to go get saved.