I Propose A More Logical Theoretical Cosmological Model Of The Macro Universe

More research on the 'fabric' of space ...http://www.sciencedaily.com...“The Birth of Time: Quantum Loops Describe the Evolution of the Universe” (ScienceDaily, Dec. 17, 2010)What was the Big Bang and what happened before it? Scientists from the Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw have attempted to answer the question. Within the framework of loop quantum gravity they have put forward a new theoretical model, which might prove useful for validating hypotheses about events prior to the Big Bang. This achievement is one of the few models describing the full Einstein's theory and not merely its greatly simplified version. Traditional cosmological models describe the evolution of the Universe within the framework of the general theory of relativity itself.In order to gain at least some knowledge of quantum gravity, scientists construct simplified quantum models, known as quantum cosmological models, in which space-time and matter are expressed in a single value or a few values alone. For example, the model developed by Ashtekar, Bojowald, Lewandowski, Pawłowski and Singh predicts that quantum gravity prevents the increase of matter energy density from exceeding a certain critical value (of the order of the Planck density). Consequently, there must have been a contracting universe prior to the Big Bang. When matter density had reached the critical value, there followed a rapid expansion -- the Big Bang, known as the Big Bounce. However, the model is a highly simplified toy model.Note: Scientists at the U of W are supporting two of my hypotheses ... that singularities are a physical impossibility and matter/energy can only be compressed so far ... and space must have existed before the Big Bang.The real answer to the mystery of the Big Bang lies in a unified quantum theory of matter and gravity. One attempt at developing such a theory is loop quantum gravity (LQG). The theory holds that space is weaved from one-dimensional threads. "It is just like in the case of a fabric -- although it is seemingly smooth from a distance, it becomes evident at close quarters that it consists of a network of fibres," describes Wojciech Kaminski, MSc from FUW. Such space would constitute a fine fabric - an area of a square centimetre would consists of 10^66 threads.On pre existing space ... According to Michio Kaku, mainstream is beginning to accept the probability. .Following is a short video: Michio Kaku, Andrei Linde, Paul Turok, Roger Penrose ... BBC series, early 2010. Please forgive the use of youtube ...http://www.youtube.com...In it, among other things, Kaku discusses the probability of our universe springing forth from 'nothing' at some point and says it's really not such a bad idea if you just re-define what nothing is. He suggests that it isn't a stretch that one of the materializing particles from pre existing space might have just 'kept going' and instantaneously shoved a rather large bunch of matter/energy into the existing space.And Andrei Linde posits an eternal (and apparently eternally accelerating) expansion of space, of which our Hubble volume is just one of the newly formed air bubbles in the Swiss cheese. On merging black holes ... 33 pairs of merging black holes were announced by astrophysicist Julie Comerford.http://adsabs.harvard.edu...Abstract: "Since nearly all galaxies host a central supermassive black hole (SMBH), mergers between two galaxies can bring dual SMBHs to the resultant merger-remnant galaxy. However, only a handful of dual SMBHs have been identified observationally, and here we present new detections of 33 dual SMBHs. We searched the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey for galaxy spectra with AGN emission lines that are offset in velocity relative to the mean velocity of the host galaxy's stars, suggesting bulk motion of the AGN within the host galaxies." "Our sample of dual SMBHs provides a direct observational probe of galaxy mergers and the galaxy merger rate, as well as SMBH mergers that are expected to produce gravity waves observable by next-generation projects such as LISA."Not always anchored to galaxies ...http://www.msnbc.msn.com...Stefanie Komossa ( Planck Institute ) and her team have now detected the consequences of such a merger: a 100-million-solar mass black hole in the process of leaving its home galaxy.The "kick" the black hole receives is akin to the recoil of a rifle. It can propel the black hole to speeds of up to several thousand miles per second, according to theoretical simulations. The escaping black hole Komossa and her team observed was racing along at 5,900,000 mph.On multiverses ...Note: In the following, Ms. Mersini-Houghton of Chapal Hill creates an entirely different universe, but apparently makes no attempt to describe it's physical laws, or structure, or how it would have left that 'imprint'. Or why there would be just 'one'.http://en.wikipedia.org...In 2007, Mersini-Houghton claimed that the observed CMB cold spot was "the unmistakable imprint of another universe beyond the edge of our own", just as she and her collaborator had predicted in her theory 8 months earlier.In Nov. 2008, a NASA team led by Alexander Kashlinsky observed the Dark Flow of clusters in the universe at exactly the velocity and alignment predicted by her earlier in the 'Cosmological Avatars of the Landscape I, II' papers in 2006.In the same year (2006) WMAP reached agreement with SDSS experiment, that the overall amplitude of fluctuation is less than 1. If these observational findings, predicted in the 2006 papers by Mersini-Houghton et al. are confirmed over the next few years, then they may offer the first evidence of a world beyond our own. Such confirmation would tie the standard model of cosmology into a more coherent picture where our universe is not at the center of the world, but part of it.After the observational confirmation of the three predictions (the Void, Dark Flow and Sigma8) her work continues to attract international media attention, GCHEP/UNC, and Discover magazine, October 2009.Two astrophysicists reported recently that they have found evidence of the northern hemisphere void in analysis of WMAP data.On October 11, 2010, Laura Mersini-Houghton appeared in a BBC programme What Happened Before the Big Bang (along with Michio Kaku, Neil Turok, Andrei Linde, Roger Penrose, Lee Smolin and other notable cosmologists and physicists) where she propounded her theory of the universe as a wave function on the landscape multiverse. The programme referred to three observational tests of her theory's predictions, which makes it the only theory on the origins of our universe ever to offer predictions and have them successfully tested.Mersini-Houghton's work on multiverse theory is discussed in the epilogue of a recently published biography of Hugh Everett III.Note: I won't argue whether or not the predictions were confirmed. I will argue that her theories and predictions are not based on known physical laws and could apply to any manner of phenomena. That the predicted phenomena could easily have other physical causes ... and her conclusions are hasty.Partial list of supporting research materials and articles available on-line ...http://www.sciops.esa.int...http://sci.esa.int...http://sci.esa.int...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.universetoday.com...http://www.science20.com...http://ttt.astro.su.se...http://susy06.physics.uci.edu...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.nscl.msu.edu...http://arxiv.org...http://notes.kateva.org...http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl...http://arxiv.org...http://sci.esa.int...http://hubblesite.org..."Hubble Astronomers Uncover an Overheated Early Universe"October 7,2010 ... The universe went through an initial heat wave over 13 billion years ago when energy from early massive stars ionized cold interstellar hydrogen from the big bang. This epoch is actually called re ionization because the hydrogen nuclei were originally in an ionized state shortly after the big bang.Several years ago I asked Nicholas Suntzeff (member of High-Z Super Nova team that discovered the rate of expansion of space was accelerating) why he thought the increasing rate of acceleration was a permanent feature of space. After all, it had apparently sped up in the past, slowed down then sped up again. Furthermore, we didn't even know what was causing it; what mechanism was involved. He conceded there was no basis to assume it was permanent.Unknown. 'Singularity' was just another word for "We don't know what it is. The math breaks down." In time, 'infinitely small/dense' morphed into 'fact' despite no experimental or observational evidence.Unknown. One scientist chided me for wasting his time because "Even a first year physics student knows black holes don't merge". Incorrect.Neil Tyson argued that the bigger a black hole got, the slower it rotated. Incorrect.Theorists agreed the early universe was homogeneous and isotropic ... no 'lumps'. Incorrect. They agreed the fundamental forces did not exist at the Big Bang. No gravity ... nothing. Evidence? None. Unknown. Could my model be wrong? Of course. It's one discovery away from being blown out of the water. But it hasn't yet.