Harry Potter is mainly a static character

"Remember, I only have to provide one way in which he is dynamic in order to prove the resolution false."This is false. My opponent thinks that by providing one reason he is dynamic will guarantee her a win. There are two reasons for this:1. The resolutionMy resolution reads that "Harry Potter is mainly a static character," emphasis on the mainly. For my opponent to win this debate she would have to prove that there are more SOLID reasons than not that Harry Potter is a static character. If I were to provide an infinite amount, as my opponent said, then I would win. But I would also like to point out that more does not nessacarily mean better. So it all comes down to the actual arguments. The resolution did not say that "Harry Potter goes through no changes throughout the series."2. Childhood advancesBefore I go on to rebut my opponent's arguments, I'll still be arguing what she has said above. Now listing just one argument is not factual or relevant to this debate if it has to do with childhood advances. Everyone grows up and matures a great deal during their childhood. To say that they do not would be wrong, because yes, every child will be immature until they get put into the "real world," which in Harry Potter is translated to about the time he and his friends begin looking for Horcruxes.Rebuttals:"At the beginning of the series, Harry is frightened of death and resents the deaths of his loved ones."This is an example of childhood advancements. Harry is a young boy who is frightened and needs love. What children aren't? Yes, by the end he is independant and no longer scared...because he is an adult. Obviously adults are not going to be."For example, when Bellatrix slaughters Sirius, Harry attempts to torture her in a fit of madness. However, by the end of the series, Harry comes to realize that death is nothing more than a piece of the cycle of life, and thus comes to terms with his own death. When Fred, Tonks, and Lupin die, for example, Harry does not fly into an outrage and attempt to demolish the Death Eaters."When Sirius dies, Harry is distraught, yes. When all the others my opponent has listed die, he is not really that upset because he wasn't particularly close to any of them. Sirius was like the last family he had left; he didn't have that connection with the others. And Harry doesn't "attempt to torture Bellatrix," he acts mercifully and does not do anything to her. He does not attempt to do anything."When he gives up his life in hopes that others will be able to demolish the rest of the Horcruxes and when he forgives Dumbledore for using him, Harry realizes that his individual safety is unimportant as long as the rest of the world is free from Voldemort's tyranny."He realized this throughout the book. He was constantly saying that he "didn't want anyone to die for him." He was always able to face the music and fight Voldemort whenever he got the chance. He knew before the prophecy that Voldemort wanted him dead. So this argument does not hold any water.Arguments:1. Harry remains good throughout the books.As I have said before, he is always doing brave and heroic things for the "good" side, like my opponent has conceded. "My opponent correctly identifies that Harry remains "good" throughout the series."2. Harry remains selfless.He performs many deeds for the good of others and always says "that no one else should die for him." He constantly puts himself in danger for others in every single book and sacrafices himself in the last.3. Harry remains merciful.No matter what people do to him, he still helps them. e.g. Malfoy and Dudley. 4. Harry remains compassionate.In the first book, "Hermione burst into tears. Before Harry could say or do anything, she tucked the enormous book under her arm, and still sobbing, ran toward the staircase to the girls' dormitories and out of sight. 'Can't you give her a break?' Harry asked Ron quietly."In the last book, Harry even feels compassion for the little piece of Voldemort's soul after he died. 5. Harry remains kind.Harry did remain kind, except for the fifth book, which was because he was being influenced by Voldemort. He was taking him over and making him mean. Other than that, he was very kind in the books. He kept a loyal friendship with his friends throughout the books. Harry's friends, everyone were eager to follow him. Why, his kindness. 6. Harry remains level-headed.Starting from the first book, Harry was very successful in Quiddich, but was always very humble and never boasted. In fact, he never boasted with any of his accomplishments, instead humbly saying that he "always had help."Sources:My knowledge of the books.I'd like to point out that my opponent has conceded with my main point and taken advantage of my resolution. I urge a vote for Pro.Anyway, I thank royalpaladin for a great debate.