The existence of God

"As detailed already the Universe doesn't care about life forming." If the Universe didn't care about life, then why would it have natural laws or the Big Bang in the first place? The Uniqueness of the Galaxy-Sun-Earth-Moon System for Life already list all the factors for a habitable planet capable of supporting life based on Earth. You said that all that is needed are the right conditions for it to begin there. Won't that indicate chance and randomness? For example, why should we have a moon at all? If the moon had never collided with the Earth, there would be no ejection of the majority of the earth's primordial atmosphere. Then the atmosphere would be similar to that of Venus, which has the runaway greenhouse effect, leaving a dry planet with a surface temperature of 800ï¿½F. Therefore, there would be no life at all on Earth if that happened. That was just one factor of hundreds of factors why the Earth is unique. The probability for the "right conditions" to occur has been roughly calculated to be 1:10^99 which indicates chance. Since the probability is so low, it explains the Fermi paradox. There is an extremely low chance for the "right conditions" to occur and therefore explains the lack of evidence for, or contact with, intelligent, advanced civilizations. (1) "And again, chance does not rule the universe, or randomness - only creationists appear to claim that one." There are possibly endless conditions why Earth has life and other planets that we observed don't. How can you explain how the natural causes made the Earth so unique? I already told you that changing the size of the Earth will already affect whether life will develop or not. Natural causes has no intelligent and could not determine how to create the Earth. How natural causes could form Earth with these exact factors without intelligence: *magnetic field *oxygen to nitrogen ratio in atmosphere *thickness of crust *distance from parent star *mass of body colliding with primordial earth *oxygen to nitrogen ratio in atmosphere *volcanic activity (1) That was just 7 factors that I stated. With just 7 factors, I have explained why Mars or Venus doesn't currently have intelligent advanced life, but Earth does. Indeed, I have never known that without knowing all the factors of why Earth is unique, scientist would have suggested the possibility that Gliese 581 may have suitable conditions for life. "And you continue to ignore factors associated with time." How? If Gliese 581 could support life, then why doesn't life over there intelligent enough to be in contact with humans? Why don't we send radio transmissions to that planet and see if there is intelligent life there? I don't see fossils indicating intelligent life on Mars or Venus. Earth is unique because it is the only planet that we observe that currently has intelligent life - Mars and Venus surely don't. Maybe there was previous life on Mars or Venus, but they didn't survive, further indicating that Earth is unique. "We know human products are designed..." Extremely clever, I daresay. Natural causes cannot create intelligence, could it? "The scientific process was invented by and depends on intelligence. Testable, un-contradicted evidence, in diverse areas of life, confirms that it takes intelligence to make something intelligent." (2) Without intelligence, why are rules formed and obeyed? "Random chance cannot create a single reasonable pattern without intelligently applied limitations/laws." I have already proved that the chance was needed for ALL conditions (possibly endless) that made Earth unique without intelligence. I have already proved that you need intelligence to make a computer, book, house, cars, or even rubber bands, didn't I. You even need more intelligence to create life out of organic materials that no one currently has ever done. Did scientist have ever created cells without intelligence? Of course not! Yet you think natural processes are more "intelligent" when it comes to create life from organic material. Thank you for detecting the flaws of my argument. I'll revise it to: [1]. Based on life on Earth, there are no current intelligent, advanced life civilizations other than on Earth itself. [2]. Human beings cannot detect other intelligent civilizations because 3 different scenarios: [1]. Intelligent civilizations don't or want to discover or can't if they were not alone. 2. Current technology is not advanced enough to detect any other intelligent civilizations. 3. Intelligent civilization other than Earth doesn't exist. [3] Therefore, the Fermi paradox is best explained either by blind chance or God due to hundreds (possibly endless) conditions that indicates a chance to form a habitable planet where life on Earth can be emulated. "Never mind your source is horribly biased and is an appeal to authority... the quotes in question belong to a 1930 book." So if I quoted, "1 + 1 = 2." from Adolf Hitler, the statement is an appeal to authority and therefore is a logical fallacy? "There is no fallacy involved in simply arguing that the statement made by an authority is true." (3) What would an unstructured universe look like: a universe with no laws, rules, logic, or mathematics and therefore, breaking the law of no contradiction. "Assuming some sort of sentient Earth to let us in on its secrets for our benefit is frankly laughable and conceited." To power society, the location of the resources which Venus and Mars happen to lack is required. Fire is primarily derived from trees and the ability to heat homes provided the ability to study and research rather than just pure survival. Before we had exhausted this resource, research efforts led to our next power source, coal. Before petroleum could run out, scientists are finding ways for new resources: wind power, solar power, etc. If you were to change even small aspects of our planet's environment, sustainable power sources may not even exist. Mars and Venus surely don't have them. Since early times, "it has been proven time and again that the minerals and materials we need are in locations that make them relatively easy to extract." That is exactly why our current society exists and Mars and Venus don't. (4) As a game designer, I have all control of every element of that game. Wouldn't that alone make me omnipotent in that game? I could create almost anything in that game and it would exist in that game. God can make the rules of the universe and still break them, because He won't be bound by these laws that He created. Law of non Contradiction applies to God? Ever heard a glitch or hack such as infinite life or resources? Those can exist and the game still would exist. "If God created this video game he is not trapped by these laws (needing creation)" and therefore God is the First Cause for the universe. God can use energy to create the universe because that energy existed before the Big Bang "in a singularity as you claimed it." If God made the universe, he can do whatever he wants. You know that there are rules in a game and reality. But God doesn't need to follow his own rules he created for the universe. Neither do I if I created the game. I can make the game whatever I want it to be and I would still exist, whether that person believes in a Creator or not. How do I not have complete control? If I could make anything "logically possible" in that game, would you consider me omnipotent or another adjective describing unlimited power to do anything in this game? Anyway, He doesn't have to follow any laws of non-contradiction, because He made them and those rules don't apply to him. (5) Source: 1. http://www.666soon.com... 2. http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com... 3. http://en.wikipedia.org... 4. http://www.realtruth.org... 5. http://www.slayerment.com...