Disabled People Should Pay More Taxes

I can't access your site. Many serial killers and rapists are mentally insane, that is true. However, the homicide rate is less then 1/10,000 and the rape rate is also rare. Murderers and rapists should get punished but just because a fellow autistic commits a crime does not mean you should be punished for it. That would like me saying that all white supremists should pay a tax because of the actions of Dylan Roof. . https://www.nytimes.com...If Special needs cause trouble in school, they get punished based off of the actions of the individual. just as you don't have to pay a fine for the murder spree commited by Dylan Roof (You said you a white supremist in a different debate), neither should autistics have to pay a fine for the crimes of other autistics. . https://www.cdc.gov...; This shows a happy guy in a wheelchair smiling at something I'm assuming is positive. Nothing wrong with this. He should not be punished for smiling. https://i.ytimg.com... shows a 40 year old woman zooming in to a computer. She is probably not retarted. Even though she's not the most attractive she should not be taxed $100,000 a year because of her apperance. You cited a bible verse in this debate. Jesus accepts the rejected and the strangers. He sais, "Whoever makes himself great will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be made great. "(Good News Translation, . http://biblehub.com...). If you say the bible is being metaphorical, it's a double standard how you support the bible when it says to punish theifs 7 fold even though most autistics don't steal much more then the typical citizen, but you dismiss this as being metaphorical. This is a double standard. . https://i.ytimg.com...; While in my opinion slightly more ugly then #1, just because you're ugly does not mean you're a burden to society. You definitely aren't justified to pay a $100,000 fine just because of one's apperance. If I think polar bears are ugly(lets say, their mouths are too big), that does not mean they should get pnuished for being ugly. "People w/cerebral palsy are so ugly, that they scare other people to death. " That's BS. Name me one time where somebody died from looking at a disabled person. None of the pictures you showed me made me want to die. They are all just pictures of normal people. "a disability is a punishment for your own sin or the sins of your parents. " This is not true. I did not get autism because of a sin my parents did. Otherwise, since everyone's parents have sinned, then we would all be autistic. You mention "Horatio Nelson voluntarily joined the British military, and at the Battle of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, he lost most of his right arm. Why? Because he tried to destroy Spain. That is racism, as an Englishman wanted to kill, or at least demoralize and politically/economically weaken Spain: I repeat, this is racism! ". This is off topic, but I'm going to pretend that it isin't. You accuse Horatio Nelson of being racist for taking orders from the monarch to attack a foreign country in a war. Nevermind the fact that your being a hypocrite since according to . http://www.debate.org..., which says that you want to genocide the following ethnicities:-Indians-Blacks-Mexicans-JewsSo your a hypocrite if you accuse him of being racist for attacking 1 ethnic group in a war but you want to attack 4 ethnic groups in a genocide because you think they are annoying and evil. "And finally, diabetes is also a disability. " While this claim is one of the most rational claims you made in this round (which is not saying much) the website you showed me does not even have the word "disability" in it. Therefore, diabetes is not an eating disability, since disability is not present. "People with diabetes eat too much food because they are fat. " It's the other way around. People with diabetes tend to be fat because they eat too much food. Please visit the website (. https://www.diabetes.co.uk......). "diabetes makes you need to urinate more often and it gives you blurred vision. They waste toilet paper, water that is used in the toilets, and makes things worse for the environment. As for blurred vision, they waste glasses, which cost lots of resources and money to manufacture. " You forgot to end your quote. Acknowledging that though and your quote does not exist in your article or video, while actually antylyzing your fake quote that you stretched to fit your agenda, although the signs of diabetes are common and accurate, these are extremely nominal and often paid for by the diabetic. They pay for their own glasses. They pay for much of the toilet paper that they use and toilet paper is so nominal that it doesn't make a difference in everyday applications. The toilet water goes to a septic tank that basicly cleans the water or it goes to a body of water where decomposer organisms eat it. Toilets aren't even the biggest cause of enviornmental damage. . http://www.academia.edu... the top 10 causes, and toilets aren't even on the list. "If someone has type 2 diabetes, it means that they drink too much and/or eat too much junk foods. In that case, they should definitely atone for the crimes their fellow alcoholics commit. " Being fat is not a crime within the civilized countries on this planet. "Because they eat too much junk food, they have little or no self control, and they probably commit other crimes such as bullying or murder. " Most fat people aren't bullies. They are more likely to get bullied then to actually get bullied, like from people like yourself so your once again, a hypocrite. "For further reading, I would like to say that what50 and masterful are the same person, and reggee is mentally retarded, as shown in his idiotic and nonsense debates, saturated with grammar errors. " This is off topic. What50 and Masterful might be the same person. I wouldn't know. If you accuse them of sounding stupid, you have said similar stuff in this debate so your a hypocrite. Charging disabled people about $300 a day just for being disabled exploits the disabled community. Dear voters, my opponent has presented a bunch of terrible, deliberatly flawed evidence. He has said extreme claims without backing them up with justified evidence. He has fake quote(s), showing that dispite his sources, they aren't relevant since his quotes are fake. They aren't present in the article. He then goes off topic and accuses other people of saying things that he says as well. My opponent is a faker, a heritic, a fraud and a hypocrite. He also advocates for genocide since he wants to nuke India over the basis of a smell.