Abortion is generally immoral.

Goody, I get to wake up in the morning to argue about abortion! Apologies in advance if I sound sour. Noting that neither of of have any new points, I will rebut your rebuttals about my rebuttals. I said, "Making abortion illegal is the same as dictating ones future, because that's exactly what happens with an unplanned child". You rebutted, "This debate is about wether or not abortion is immoral, not if it should be legal or not" Isn't influencing lives immoral? You should only be responsible for your own, changing another's life, in the case of abortion for the worse, is highly immoral. I said some stuff about the fetus not being self conscious, and you COMPLETELY disregarded me for it. The fetus does not exist on the worldy realm yet, until it is out of the womb, it has not yet lived. A fetus is a fetus. Here is the Webster diction definition of a Human being : "A man, woman, or child of the species Homo Sapiens, distinguished form other animals by superior in mental development, power of articulate speech, and an upright stance". Lets compare a human fetus to that of the definition of "Human being". Does a fetus have superior mental development to that of an adult? Or a dog? I would think not. Can a fetus recite Shakespeares "Macbeth" while holding the script in its hands? I would think not. Can a fetus stand up? I certainly hope not, that would cause negative development in the womb to the mother, as well as said fetus. I say how many mothers go through birth control because they acknowledge they couldn't support a child, and are taking the wise initiative to dispose of the fertilized egg or fetus, depending on month of pregnancy.Once again, you state this argument as a case of legality, not morality. Seriously? I would say its immoral to take miscare of a child, not misfeed a child, to miseducate a child mentally, socially, and physically. Denying the child to food, motherly love, and school, is the very immoral, and this doesn't happen if the mother aborts in the womb, both the child and mother are spared hardships. Morality, because the child and mother are receiving proper care. You proven jack squat about the Fetus being a self-conscious human being. Do you remember being in your mothers womb? When did you really have your first memory? Stop using fetus and innocent in the same sentence, you've given no scientific proof that a fetus is self-conscious. Pre-natal scanning cannot detect mental health defects! Its not like an MRI, or a CAT scan, all you can see is the child. And how many mothers have killed their children because of health defects? If their normal, they'll be loving and caring regardless. Dude, your being a complete ***hole the way you talk about rape! Why must a woman care for a rape-conceived baby? That doesn't seem very logical, wise, or moral. Why is it unfair to kill it? She didn't want to have the baby, she didn't give consent to the person responsible, so WHY IN LORD BUDDHA'S MUST SHE HAVE A CHILD? Have you considered she doesn't want children? Trauma can be permanent, one time my dad got a clown for my birthday, and guess what? I'm still afraid of clowns. Rape pain? What a dreadful euphemism. Neither of us have been raped, so I doubt either of us know the trauma and pain suffered through it. Once again, you've proven me nil that the fetus is self-conscious. Before Start ranting again, I've noticed that your platform for EVERY argument and rebuttal of yours, is that the Fetus, or a "Human being" in your words, is innocent. How? It doesn't mentally exist yet. Its just a bunch of cells. I ask you again, what scientific evidence proves that fetus's and are self-conscious? Conclusion? Sometimes abortion is immoral, but most times it isn't. That rape thing was completely ludicrous, by the way. And don't say that I didn't prove abortion is moral, because you didn't prove that it is Immoral. You also have no opinion towards your own statements, one cannot legitimately criticize their own work with accuracy. That's up to the public.