Atheism is a lie.

sorry. My opponent Pro will be argung against my resolution that atheism is a lie. Thanks bro for pointing that out. If atheism is by definition simply "a lack of belief in a deity "then can I also say that if God is not a deity, then it's quite possible atheists believe in God. Can an atheist believe in God? Any kind of God? Then by definition, he would no longer be atheist. He would need to find a new label for himself. Since this atheist , does not believe in Zeus Mithra Harrah Hercules and the like, of any other DEity known to man, does he believe in a Monitheistic Spinoza God? If so... Is such a person an atheist at all ? Albert Einstein believed in the Spinoza vers Albert Einstein believed in the Spinoza God. Although many atheists would love to claim Albert Einstein as one of their own, because Albert Einstein does not believe in a deity, why didn't Albert Einstein call himself an atheist? Why did Albert Einstein constantly refer to God when describing the laws of physics? We all know Albert Einstein was not religious, nor did he worship some imaginable deistic figure, but we also recognize quite clearly Albert had his own version of what he thought God was. Albert also made it clear, such beliefs were personal and not up for scrutiny. So was Albert Einstein an atheist ? He did not believe in a deity, but he did believe in a creator of some kind . Personal or impersonal was the question. Or was he just undecided? Huxley, famous philosopher/atheist has recognized this very issue, and Coined a term that properly reflected such individuals. He called them, agnostic. And from that point in time, a lack of belief in a deity or a lack of belief in general was more commonly pointing to the agnostic. So what is the difference between an agnostic and atheist? I propose that an agostic to somebody who lacks belief, in the sense that lacking implies a desire for fulfillment. The agnostic is not necessary disbelieving, but also unable to believe, therefore being undecided. To lack belief , does not mean one lacks belief in god, but lacks believe in general, including disbelief. Undecided. To say you are an agnostic atheist is simply dishonest. Contrasting that, an atheist is somebody who has an active disbelief in any proposition relating to creation , purpose, truth, and God. And atheist is not undecided. An atheist has weighed the evidence he thinks he possesses and has made a judgment to not only lack believe in a God, but positively believe in an alternate story. To say that their alternate story is true or even more likely than the biblical God is simply dishonest. What that story is turns out to be different for every single atheist. Of course we all know , By logic and common sense , Atheist can definitively know the beginnings of the universe, life , or absolute truth. Yet they have some how decided that God does not exist. Likely or unlikely is irrelevant. You may make a decisions based how likely an event is, but once you come to a decision thats the end of discussion. You have decided. To say you have not is dishonest. How they have decided such is through science, believing that science provides evidences against God. If God is the creator of all life and madder than science can only study Gods creation. Then how does science disprove God? Never has. Never will. To even suggest the notion thya science contradicts God, is not only ignorant, it is dishonest.