Islam will trump the LGBT movement in the end

References: http://lgbt.wikia.com... http://www.mpvusa.org... Jordan's muslim country from the internet's browsing ability seems to appear the most progressive towards LGBT. However, even they seem to be non-protective of legally enforcing the LGBT individuals. (At least from the information and news I have collected and read up on so right now; unless you'd be willing to share your open source of information, unless you are the bigot and racist to believe such things will not conflict with each other.) This indicates to me, that although Aisha (who was married at a pedophile who was claimed to be their religion's founding religious leader) had a friend who was an unusual male was allowed to enter both the male and female private quarters and was punished for his discussion of the female body (not the fact he was *unusual*) would for me in how I understand and view things, mean that although the ISLAMIC faith tends to claim the following and acceptance of the Old Testament (which they claim the Jews and Christians have a faulty version with twists and lies, and they themselves have yet to actually produce the non-faulty version which by the way...go look at the Jewish tradition of how the Old Testament Torah was written down and what would happen to the scribes who would be found guilty of faulty replacement...) so it seems ever convenient that they pick and choose what to say and who says it and when. So I ask for clarification, by means of religious acceptance if ISLAMIC faith accepts the LGBT as a whole (without repercussions anywhere along its fence-lines of religious teaching and practice... which Islamic teaching, and which country practices that teaching and enforces and stands up for the protection of or get off your high-horse of calling me a bigot and racist) If you are unable to provide such things, if anything providing name-calling produces the reverse effect when the person accused is found innocent of such claims. Would you disagree? But I am not one about calling someone names, because that is ineffective and produces a lack of proper judgement to understand someone else's viewpoints. (I hope you will agree, and apologize for such name-calling without direct references of exact information claiming peace, love, and harmony. To require someone to bow-down or killed and pay taxes(jizya) upon the mercy of an islamic devoted individual/country/population who has *conquered* the terrority and now requires everyone to submit to their faith is not peaceful, nor is it under the same conditions, rights, or beliefs of any other faith I know of, Wiccans don't practice that, Christians don't, Jews don't, can you explain to me which religion other than ISLAM practices that? Or even teaches of such thing in their islamic doctrine of *a peaceful harmony of inclusiveness and accepting of other individuals and practices*? I am one for peace and acceptance of all. But when one religious faith says to convert everyone and control all the territory of the world. I find it hard to believe that faith is actually full of *peace* as they claim without telling absolute lies under the terms for peace. Explain now.. Or have you lost your ability to understand what I am saying from the complexity of not knowing what faith ISLAM really is?