Communism (Marxist) Vs Facism (Ideology is up to Contender)

Sure go ahead with capitalism, I'm all for that, and if you have more to say on this topic after round 3 i'm up for another challenge. :D Gonna take some time to deal with these mistakes first. Sorry about that difference in Communism and Marxism, Jesus how did I forget that? So anyway Communism is a form of government that is based off of Marxist ideas, while Marxism is the philosophy, so i'm arguing for a positive look on the Marxist philosophy and supporting the Communist form of government. Now to the idea of the "farmers will not be motivated" thing, your sort of right about that, true if I had to work as a farmer to get paid the same amount I would be fatigued very quick. However you see this happens in the employment industry all the time, take for example an office drone, sitting around doing office drone things while he/she gets paid the same amount, most people in America would be afraid to ask their employer for a higher wage as this is really taboo in America. A communist worker is motivated by nationalist pride, by honor to his fellow proletarian, by the idea that his work can't benefit a corporate bourgeoisie tyrant. That is what motivates a communist like myself, the idea of a bright future. Now for the argument against this I say this: Communism is built on the principle that equal work is for equal pay, if a farmer or worker produces a low amount of product, then he/she will be given low pay, if he/she makes moderate product, they get moderate pay, (see what i'm saying?). The same thing happens in capitalist society, if you don't make enough sales in something, your employer might lower your pay as a way of telling you to step up your game, this is what drives us to produce so much. The communist idea of this is to benefit not the employer or the company but, to benefit yourself and your fellow proletarian, as the food you produce is given to the workers, that depend on you to make that food, it's all about a basic trust system here. Next: The idea of the economy getting better is because, the constant production of produce is necessary so that there is a large amount of supply for the demand, the demand coming from foreign countries not just people in your country, take for example China, you have a majority of your things made in China, you see it everywhere, they make up some of the richest people on the planet, all because they sell their products to foreign countries this is what makes a communist society money. If you sell your products to foreign countries that need those products you can make quite a bit of money. Sadly, China is one of those countries that love to exploit their workers, they have basically just a communist economy on the idea of the whole foreign trade thing. Alright NB 1: The global revolution is a term for the revolution of communism that, "Soon the nations of the world will join the communist party." This is where entire countries rise up and become communist. What I said was if a single person such as, Fidel Castro, Mao, or Stalin become leader and take all the wealth and income from the other countries. If they alone control the country and the industry. When all the industry and all the land is supposed to belong to everyone and that the people are to work together and produce their food and tools for each-other. 2: Yeah it's sad that Stalin had to enforce such fear on the SU, and I know Stalin was brutal. I can't argue against him, he was a tyrant and the worst example of a communist. The fact that he helped the Soviet Union survive with military strength and fear is scary to think about. He was a brutal dictator and a backstabbing ally of Lenin. Out of all the leaders of SU the only leader of the Soviets that was really scary and was mad with military takeover. But, Stalin didn't necessarily have to have been what kept the Soviet Union running. Lenin was a jerk too, but, he wasn't as bad as Stalin. He never wanted to support his personal gain in the Soviet Union, and was even working on making sure Stalin couldn't take over. So Stalin was a horrible dictator, but the question of him being a necessary evil has a mixed answer. There are no good examples of Communism, there are just examples and bad examples, Stalin is one of them.