There is undeniable evidence for the Theory of Evolution

MY OPPONENT-"They aren't your arguments" yes they are. A posted them on this site, agreeing with every one of them. If any one else who had put them in different words, they would be the same argument, but put differently in a different order. Meaning no matter what the argument is the same, its just written differently. So i CAN say these are my arguments. MY OPPONENT-"I would have loved to reply - to an honest debater. Not a cheater." How did i cheat? by posting good arguments? I am sure that you would call that cheating because you cannot argue against them. I am sure if you would have loved to reply, it shouldn't matter who the argument is from, obviously i have the same opinion as the author making them my arguments as well. But obviously my opponent was at loss of words after reading this, knowing there was nothing he could say against them. MY OPPONENT- "I start a debate, My opponent rips off another source word for word. I protest. My opponent defends the indefensible. He continues to appeal for you to ignore his blatant plagiarism. Shameful." Ripping off? i would say posting an argument supporting the things they have said, would be more like helping them, not ripping them off.... AND again its not word for word. look at the last four paragraphs. Shameful? you wish to accuse me of being shameful, when you yourself started the debate and choose not to argue against it? that is the very essence of shame my friend. not arguing a good argument. That just shows how good this argument actually was, if my opponent can't even refute it. MY OPPONENT-"If they were your arguments, I'd be happy to refute. But they aren't, and I am not debating the author of that forum entry. I am debating you." NO actually you aren't debating me. you have not refuted my arguments once in this debate therefor not a debate. And if a agree with the author of this forum, and am just saying every thing he has said, then you are in fact debating me, seeing as i agree with everything the author has to say. Can i say that any thing you would have said would be taboo, just because its probably like what darwin would have said? no that indeed would be ignorance as you have shown. MY OPPONENT- "Pride (I am not wrong, I can steal and post anything I want.) Ignorance (Plagiarism is OK!)" Pride (uh oh this guys posted some really good arguments... how about i just dont argue them back and accuse him for other things because his arguments are too good to deefend against...) Ignorance (whatever, i am just going to quit now, because my opponent has some good sources i dont wish to fend off) MY OPPONENT- "NO it has not been a debate due to your blatant dishonesty. That's why." Blatant dishonesty? meaning me using another source to support my case? oh thats dishonest alright. Well in that case i am sorry for posting arguments so good, that you could not even refute them, and for making you look bad in front of everyone who views this debate. I would like all viewers to read the first argument i have made and vote according to the weight of this argument i have made. also acknowledge that my opponent made no rebuttal what-so-ever. thankyou fo-shizzle