Any believer in the bible has to agree that the land of israel belongs to the jewish people

My opponent had suggested without substantiating his claim in any way that A. the covenant of g-d with the Jewish people is null and void if the Jews don't keep the torah and B. that the land of Israel is contingent upon that C. the Jews have broken the covenant. If any one of these three things is not true, then my opponent's argument is dis proven. All of these things can easily be refuted. But first let us show that from the very verses that I quoted we can disprove his statement. G-d says in these verses that he is making an everlasting covenant and Israel will be an everlasting inheritance. My opponent is saying that g-d lied over here, because g-d said he's making an everlasting covenant and that covenant has ended. ( Numbers 23:19 God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it? ). The way I see it we are left with one of two options, either g-ds covenant is not contingent upon the Jewish people keeping the Torah or g-d is promising that there will always be Jews who will be keeping the Torah, or else it would not be an everlasting covenant. If my opponent would have read the verses quoted he would have seen that it's not their covenant with g-d rather it's g-ds covenant with them. I'll just quote two places where g-d says that he will not nullify his covenant with them. In Leviticus chapter 26 g-d tells the Jews the 48 curses which will befall them if they don't keep the Torah and then he concludes verse 44 "And yet for all that, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them, neither will I abhor them, to destroy them utterly, and to break My covenant with them; for I am the LORD their God". Now g-d says clearly in Ezekiel that even if the Jews don't want the Torah any more they don't have a choice and g-d is their g-d no matter what. Chapter 20 verses 32 Quote "But what enters your mind shall not come about, what you say, 'Let us be like the nations, like the families of the lands, to serve wood and stone. ' As I live, says the Lord God, surely with a strong hand and with an outstretched arm and with poured out fury, will I reign over you. And I shall take you out of the peoples, and I shall gather you from the lands in which you were scattered, with a strong hand and with an outstretched arm and with poured out fury". And then it goes on in verse 41 quote "With a pleasing savor I shall accept you when I take you out of the nations, and I shall gather you from the lands in which you were scattered, and I shall be hallowed through you before the eyes of the nations. And you will know that I am the Lord when I bring you to the land of Israel, to the land that I lifted My hand to give to your forefathers". Hence point number one is disproven. Now the concept of a covenant is a common thing in the bible, and it could be for a number of things. For example we find Jacob making a covenant with Laban that they won't be at war with each other. So there's a verse in the bible where g-d makes a specific covenant that he's giving the land of Israel to the Jewish people, and that's the whole covenant (not in the context of a covenant of being their g-d). This is a verse in Nehemiah where it says in chapter 9 verse 8 quote "You found his heart faithful before you, and made with him the covenant to give to his offspring the land of the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Amorite, the Perizzite, the Jebusite, and the Girgashite". Hence point number two is disproven. I'm sure my opponent is aware that there are a few million Jews in the world who do exactly as g-d asks of them keeping all the laws of the Torah etc. as there always had been religious Jews. So I see no reason to accept his statement that the Jews broke the covenant. (I completely did not understand his statement about the covenant of the Ten Commandments, surely he's aware that there are 613 commandments not 10, and what was the basis of saying that "all" Jews have to keep it or it's null and void). To be quite honest I very surprised that someone that introduces himself as a Torah observant Jew, can say that the covenant between g-d and the Jewish people is null and void. After all it's one of the principles of faith that the Torah will never be changed and is eternal. Now my opponent introduced himself as a pragmatist. Implying of course that I'm just being dogmatic, I respond like this. On every level I believe it's a mistake to create a Palestinian state. On a safety, common sense level, on a moral level, and on a religious level. Each one of these is a debate in its own right; our debate is regarding the religious level. I'm proposing that anyone that believes in the bible (and that's a few billion people) must accept at least religiously that g-d gave the land of Israel to the Jewish people, and therefore religiously the Palestinians should perhaps get a state elsewhere, but not in Israel. I have so many more verses which clearly say that g-d had given the land of Israel to the Jewish people. If my opponent wants to say that there is "no biblical claim" he's going to have to do better than just say that the covenant with the Jews is over.