9/11 was an inside job

"The reason why some aspects of what happened when the towers collapsed cant be explained is because its literally never been observed before either before or after 9/11" Okay, the idea that things unobserved before cannot be explained is not that great. I think you're entirely missing the idea of physics and engineering which maintains that what happened to the twin towers was not physically possible given the maximum heat of jet plane fuel and etc. We've never seen the formation of stars before either but can understand how this comes to be. "The report focused mostly on the actions of the hijackers" this point here is actually very close to what i'm saying. given this knowledge the question would be logical why did it focus so much on that and the answer i provide fits soundly it focused on the terrorists so the goverment could blame them and therefore justify a war based on that. "The report doesnt completely explain why the towers collapsed because its focus was assigning blame and detailing teh plot of those behind the attacks. " "If the government couldn't even handle a response to Hurricane Katrina, or handle the annual budget without shutting themselves down". I think that the government being in different sectors has areas that are effective and areas that are not. Given the amount of resources the us government has access to i think that they could make this possible entirely this is furthered by the unexpected nature of the hurricane. "In order to prove that the US government orchestrated the attacks though you need actual proof that they were behind it" Actually thats not needed to prove it at all. Firstly you have to prove motiff- the government has this as the attacks were used to justify wars. Then opportunity- given their resources they definitely have this. "Al-Qaeda after a while even admitted that they were the ones behind the attacks" this seemingly puts a damper on the whole argument until you realize that for a long time the us government and al Qaeda were tight as pees in a pod, they provided arms to them previously and even had them on their bankroll. "A conspiracy of this size has never even been attempted by a government in history" their are actually numerous examples no doubt not of the same proportion, for instance the golf of tonkin incident, and the burning of the reichstag by the nazis but blamed on the communists. even if it has never been attempted that doesn't change the plausibility of the event itself and the logic behind your initial statement is akin to "the moon landing was never attempted before it was and therefore was fake" "A conspiracy of this proportion would involve the government having to pay off" um no it wouldn't. im sure some of the famiiies believe that the terrorists were behind it however if you research you'll find that many of the people who are most advocative of the conspiracy are fire fighters and family members who were involved in the events. "and this is the same government that couldnt figure out that Iraq didnt have weapons of mass destruction" this is based on the premise that the goverment made a mistake in invading iraq which to me just shows lack of research as well. The us government invaded iraq for numerous reasons all relating to oil and how it keeps the us dollar afloat. http://www.youtube.com... please watch this before replying, cheers thanks for the fun.