I will not contradict myself

When I asked if I could have 16 questions, I meant if I could LIST 16 instead of 15. However, I'll answer yours anyway. 1) Do you support Occupy Wall Street? - YES, but it lacks real leadership 2) Do you agree with medical marijuana use? - Yes, medical marjuana doesn't seem deadly 3) Do you think the world is fucked right now? - Not really, but the USA needs better Gov't leadership, World: cooperation 4) Should voting be compulsory? - No, but not voting can be charged with $10 fine, works great in Australia! 5) Would you agree that most politicians are power-hungry? - No, Obama isn't, some others are just corrupted for special interests 6) Do you agree with separation of church and state? - Yes 7) Should gay marriage be legal? - State level: Yes, Federal Level: Unsure 8) Is Patriotism foolish because one cannot choose their country? - No, but patriotism should not be in way of rational diplomacy or be promoted widely 9) Can one be moral without Religion? - Tough one, I think Yes 10) Is USA the greatest country in our current day? - Is great, but some other nations have better education for K-12, others have great Health Care. The USA can reform itself and become the best 11) Should creationism be taught in schools alongside Science? - No, unless in private schools 12) Was John Lennon a fool? - I guess? I am not a real fan of his works 13) Do you support Sarah Palin? - Heck no. If she was President, I will move (literally) to Canada. 14) Do you believe in an afterlife? - Depends on which religion you are speaking of. I am a Christian. 15) Could Anarchism work? - No, I just hosted a debate saying it CANNOT work Contradictions Found 1) My opponent says that he supports Right-To-Die, but then later says he is against Euthanasia. Euthanasia is also known as Right-to-die when patients are terminally ill and/or facing critical, horrible pain. 2) My opponent says he doesn't think global warming exists, but says agrees with the statement " Do you think believe that the science community is right on environmental issues? " The science community has a 97% consensus that global warming is real and is man made. 3) My opponent agreed that "Do think that people engage in R. E. M. sleep each night? " However, when I ask if "Do you think that people dream every night, sometimes up to 3-5 times? ", he says no. R. E. M. sleep is a sleep stage that people dream in, and this occurs about 5 times a night. So, he is saying people go in the dream stage each night, but doesn't think people dream 3-5 times or more a night. This is a contradiction. . http://en.wikipedia.org... 4) My opponent says that the science community is right on health issues, and they say people dream 3-5+ times a night. This is a contradiction. 5) My opponent disagrees with "Do you have trust the U. S. Government? " but agrees (has trust in the Gov't) that the Iraqi War is over and "Do you agree with the U. S. Government that Osama Bin Laden has been killed? " he answers yes. Another contradiction. 6) I ask "Do you think that Capitalism is a good idea? " and my opponent says no. However, he agrees that with the question "Do you support a Capitalist Mixed Economy? " A Capitalist Mixed Economy is an economy that is mixed but has more free private enterprise than public enterprises. Contradiction. 7) My opponent disagrees that "Do you think people have a right to own weapons? " but says he agrees with "Do you think that people should be able to own a kitchen silverware? " Kitchen Silverware, mostly knifes, can be used as a weapon. 8) I ask "Do you think I have been honest and transparent in this debate? " he answers yes. However, in round 2, I list the questions in a sloppy order. The order should be numerical, but I list the questions as 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 12, 14, 15. This is a gross error on my part (on purpose), but he says that I have been transparent and clear. However, putting the numbers in a confusing sequence is not fully transparent. 9) My opponent answers yes "Do you think that there should be a separation of church and state? " However, later he says yes to "Are (do) you support school vouchers for all legitamite private schools and public schools? " Private schools are usually religious, which violates the principle of separation of church and state, since the state is giving religious institutions funding. 10) I ask "Do you think that the U. S should continue having No Child Left Behind Act in schools? " my opponent says no. Later I ask "Do you support the amount of standardized testing America currently has? " he says yes again. N. C. L. Behind Act gives more standardized testing to schools, contradicting his first response. 11) My opponent agrees with drug legalization. However, he also agrees with "Do you think government should protect society, and not endanger their citizens? " Drugs are harmful to society, contradicting his first response. He also says he agrees with this question: "Do you agree with Michael Moore's stance on drugs that they f*ck you up, slow you down, and ruin your daily existence? (besides prescription drugs)" However, he says drugs should be legal, and government should protect society. His answers contradict. 12) My opponent says yes with the question, "Do you think people should have a right to nearly total social freedom? " However, once again he says he disagrees with, "Do you think that people have a right to be nude on a public beach? " That is a limit of social freedom, one that is pretty basic among civil societies (except a few). 13) My opponent says yes to "Are you a liberal? " However, he disagrees with a main tenet of American Liberal beliefs, "Do you support a Constitutional Federal Republic with Capitalism that is justly regulated? " I will admit however that he may be a liberal in New Zealand politics, not American politics. Still, the American definition of liberal (not classic liberal) is pretty universal.