Is GOD ONE (Tauheed) and not in TRINITY

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, MOST GRACIOUS, MOST MERCIFUL. May the Peace and blessings of Allah be unto you my fellow brother and to everyone reading this debate. The topic before me today God is One (Tauheed) and not Trinity is not new in debate platforms between Islamic and Christian faithfuls. Infact, it has been for ages and I believe it won't stop here. First of all, I believe my opponent and I both agree that God exists since logically we would not be making any debate if God exist as One or in Trinity, But i stand to be corrected and open for any debate to proof God really exists, I would also state some qualities of God in which would be open for clarification if my opponent does not agree with any. These qualities are same as that I used in my previous debate since both topics are a bit familiar. You can search for the debate on this platform YEHOSHUA IS GOD. 1. God is One 2. God is sovereign and does not depend on anyone 3. God was not begotten 4; God has none like him 5. God has knowledge of everything 6. God does not change 7. God never sleeps nor slumbers 8. God is the only One that sits on THE HEAVENLY THRONE 9. God does not lie 10. God can never have His God To back my claim and prove the Oneness of God, i would provide some scriptural evidences in both Bible and Quran. I would then proceed further in refuting the claims as Jesus being God and the Holy Spirit being part of God, thereby debunking the term TRINITY which is a word that never for once appeared in the Bible. Be careful. My opponent would claim Trinity thus appeared in 1st John 5 vs 7 ( For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one). This appears in the King James Version of the Bible. But what does the Revised Standard Version say; 1 John 5:7Revised Standard Version (RSV) And the Spirit is the witness, because the Spirit is the truth. This is the closest chapter regarding the word TRINITY. The Preface of this Revise Standard Version Bible made a claim that the King James Version has so many errors. Let me copy a little exerts from the Preface of RSV Bible Yet the King James Version has grave defects. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision of the English translation. The task was undertaken, by authority of the Church of England, in 1870. The English Revised Version of the Bible was published in 1881-1885; and the American Standard Version, its variant embodying the preferences of the American scholars associated in the work, was published in 1901. The problem of establishing the correct Hebrew and Aramaic text of the Old Testament is very different from the corresponding problem in the New Testament. For the New Testament we have a large number of Greek manuscripts, preserving many variant forms of the text. Some of them were made only two or three centuries later than the original composition of the books. For the Old Testament, only late manuscripts survive, all (with the exception of the Dead Sea texts of Isaiah and Habakkuk and some fragments of other books) based on a standardized form of the text established many centuries after the books were written. The King James Version of the New Testament was based upon a Greek text that was marred by mistakes, containing the accumulated errors of fourteen centuries of manuscript copying. It was essentially the Greek text of the New Testament as edited by Beza, 1589, who closely followed that published by Erasmus, 1516-1535, which was based upon a few medieval manuscripts. A major reason for revision of the King James Version, which is valid for both the Old Testament and the New Testament, is the change since 1611 in English usage. The greatest problem, however, is presented by the English words which are still in constant use but now convey a different meaning from that which they had in 1611 and in the King James Version. These words were once accurate translations of the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures; but now, having changed in meaning, they have become misleading. They no longer say what the King James translators meant them to say. You can go to http://www.bible-researcher.com... for the full preface which clearly refutes 1john 5 vs 7 of the KJV Bible. BIBLICAL PROOF OF THE ONENESS OF GOD 1. there is no one like Yahweh our God." Exodus 8:10 2. Yahweh, He is God; there is no other besides Him." Deuteronomy 4:35 3. Yahweh, He is God in heaven above and on the earth below; there is no other." Deuteronomy 4:39 4. See now that I, I am He, And there is no god besides Me" Deuteronomy 32:39 5. You are great, O Lord God; for there is none like You, and there is no God besides You" 2 Samuel 7:22 6. "Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me." Isaiah 43:10 7. "'I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God besides Me." Isaiah 44:6 8. "Surely, God is with you, and there is none else, No other God." Isaiah 45:14 9. "I am Yahweh, and there is none else." Isaiah 45:18 10. "Is it not I, Yahweh? And there is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; There is none except Me." Isaiah 45:21 11. "No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one [hen] and love the other, or he will be devoted to one [hen] and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth." Matthew 6:24 12. ""The foremost is, 'Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God is one [hen] Lord; " Mark 12:29 13. "there is no God but one [hen]" 1 Corinthians 8:4 14. "yet for us there is but one [hen] God, the Father, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one [hen] Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him." 1 Corinthians 8:6 15. "Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only [monos] God" 1 Timothy 1:17 16. "For there is one [hen] God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus," 1 Timothy 2:5 17. Galatians 3:20 " Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one. 18. "there is no God but one [hen]" 1 Corinthians 8:4 19. "to the only [monos] wise God, Amen." Romans 16:27 20. Isaiah 43:11 I, even I, am the Lord; and beside me there is no saviour. QURAN PROOF OF THE ONENESS OF GOD Quran 23 vs 91 "God has not taken to Himself any son, nor is there any god with Him: For then each god would have taken of that which he created and some of them would have risen up over others." QURAN 112 VS 1 "In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. Say (O Muhammad) He is God the One God, the Everlasting Refuge, who has not begotten, nor has been begotten, and equal to Him is not anyone." Quran 21 vs 22 And Why, were there gods in earth and heaven other than God, they (heaven and earth) would surely go to ruin." Quaran 29 vs 46 And do not argue with the People of the Scripture except in a way that is best, except for those who commit injustice among them, and say, "We believe in that which has been revealed to us and revealed to you. And our God and your God is one; and we are Muslims [in submission] to Him." Quran 59:22-24 "He is God; there is no god but He, He is the Knower of the unseen and the visible; He is the All-Merciful, the All-Compassionate. He is God, there is no God but He. He is the King, the All-Holy, the All-Peace, the Guardian of Faith, the All-Preserver, the All-Mighty, the All-Compeller, the All-Sublime. Glory be to God, above that they associate! He is God the Creator, the Maker, the Shaper. To Him belong the Names Most Beautiful. All that is in the heavens and the earth magnifies Him; He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise." THERE ARE LOT OF SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCES TO PROVE THE ONENESS OF GOD Dear reader please watch what scriptures my opponent would bring concerning TRINITY. He would quote a verse like this John 10:30 I and my Father are one. Please i would want you to read previous verses preceding this verse. It clearly shows oneness of purpose.The translation of this verse has its problem from the original Hebrew or Aramiac which was originally used which had its contextual meaning. There are some scriptural verses that are similar to this. "The glory which You have given Me I have given to them, that they may be one [hen], just as We are one [hen]" John 17:22 "For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one [echad] flesh. " Genesis 2:24 Does this mean a man and woman fused into one being? NO Can you call the 12 disciples one being? NO They all have separate existence but are ONE as regards to the contextual meaning of the speaker. We see, then, that the Father and Jesus Christ are also one in the same sense that Jesus prayed for the Church to be one"not one single being, but multiple beings who are one in purpose, belief, direction, faith, spirit and attitude. Let us not forget that i mentioned earlier the 10 qualities of God; 1. God is One 2. God is sovereign and does not depend on anyone 3. God was not begotten 4; God has none like him 5. God has knowledge of everything 6. God does not change 7. God never sleeps nor slumbers 8. God is the only One that sits on THE HEAVENLY THRONE 9. God does not lie 10. God can never have His God I have clearly proved quality #1 and I expect my opponent to show us where Jesus explicitly said I AM GOD or WORSHIP ME if he refutes my claim. Looking at the 10 qualities, I would want my opponent to show me if Jesus has any of these qualities of God and he has to do this convincingly. I AM WAITING. While I wait, I would be preparing for my ROUND 2 where i would explicitly show you the qualities and manifestations of the Holy Spirit(s) and why the Holy Spirit(s) cannot be regarded as God. I would be using the last RUND 3 as my rebuttals of any claim my opponent does wrongly. Please stay tuned.