Gay Marriage

Therefore, any facts derived from it are moot and inconclusive. I will not respond or acknowledge the part of his argument that was in the comments section. R1: Marriage is union between a man and a woman"For several reasons a same-sex union contradicts the nature of marriage: It is not based on the natural complementary of male and female; it cannot cooperate with God to create new life; and the natural purpose of sexual union cannot be achieved by a same-sex union. Persons in same-sex unions cannot enter into a true conjugal union. Therefore, it is wrong to equate their relationship to a marriage. "(1)A marriage has to be between a man and a woman:1. As the Holy God said: "As for you, be fruitful and increase in number; multiply on the earth and increase upon it. "Genesis 9:7Two of the same sexes cannot multiply and be fruitful. According to the Almighty God, the purpose of a relationship is to be fruitful. Therefore, only a man and a woman should get married because only they can be fruitful.2. God brought into this world Adam and Eve. Not Eve and Eve or Adam and Adam. This shows that it is natural to love the opposite sex, not the same sex. My opponent has mentioned that 10 countries have legalized gay marriage. This is true, but he is completely missing the other side of the issue. There are 204 countries in the world. (2) Therefore, only 10/204 countries have legalized gay marriage. Less than 5% of the countries in the world have legal gay marriage. As a whole, a society is usually correct. If society states that gay marriage ought to be not legal, then it shall be. R2: Homosexuality is not naturalMy opponent has posted about how some animals practice homosexuality. He is therefore jumping to conclusions that since:Animals practice it=Natural1. By that theory, since animals kill each other in the wild for food and eat the flesh with their bare hands, we should also (because we are animals).2. Charles Darwin, the founder of the modern evolution theory states that:“Homosexuality is a negative corruption of humanity with no evolutionarily useful attributes. As the 'homosexuality gene' is passed from parent to child, and homosexuals do not breed, my theory predicts that the Homo sexualus species will soon become extinct”~ Charles Darwin An interesting study that I found about pheromones: . http://news.nationalgeographic.com...It states that response of homosexuals to synthetic chemicals is closer to a heterosexual person of the opposite sex. "The finding builds on previous research that suggest that gay men responded in a way more similar to heterosexual women than heterosexual men when exposed to a synthetic chemical. "(3)Therefore, homosexuals actually have brain chemistry which is more similar to the opposite sex. As a result, homosexuality is not natural. Unfortunately I am running out of room so I will post one last quote from an scientific study titled: Born or Bred? Science does not support the claim that homosexuality is a choice. (4)"In May of 2000, the American Psychiatric Association issued a fact sheet stating that ". .there are no replicated scientific studies supporting a specific biological etiology for homosexuality. "(4)People are not born homosexuals, instead it is a choice. There is a multitude of scientific data to back up the claim that homosexuality is not genetic. ConclusionIn conclusion, I have shown that marriage should be only between a man and a woman. Homosexuality is also not natural. Most of my opponent's arguments were based on opinions, not facts. VOTE CON(1). http://www.americancatholic.org...(2)http://en.wikipedia.org...(3)http://news.nationalgeographic.com...(4)http://www.cwfa.org...