White Democrats are more racist in general than white Republicans

The Democratic Party was the party in favor of slaves. Notice that Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican President. Think about that. Democrats are the political children of those that were pro slavery and pro klan.Remember now, bro, being against slavery doesn't mean you're not racist. Slavery and racism are two inherently different things. The slave trade was not for racist reasons. Also don't forget that whites, as well as blacks, Hispanics, any citizen in the South that broke a law was sentenced to slavery.Now your argument is that Lincoln was not racist. Not true at all. In fact, the complete opposites.http://www.bartleby.com..."I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not"But that's not damning enough. Look who he appointed to a position in government: Mr Rowan Hinton Helper. http://docsouth.unc.edu...Contrary to what you might be thinking, bro, it's his work that called for lynchings of non-whites in America, viewing them as a threat.In fact the end of the article even declares that his racist work got Lincoln elected: "In January 1861 the Herald declared that Lincoln's election had been due to "this very work of Mr. Helper, and kindred speeches and documents.""Racism was, of course, a guiding principle, but not quite as guiding as the hatred of the Republicans, the party of Lincoln, the Yankees who early Klansmen believed destroyed their homeland through what they termed a “war of northern aggression.”I disagree. I don't say this to go against you, my friend, but that isn't the reason. Racism was the main reason. Because as I said before, the Klan existed in the North long before the South as mentioned. There was sentiment against the Union, but most of those the anti-Union sentiment was not coming from racists. If anything the USA was more racist than the Confederacy.The KKK was founded in Tennessee immediately after the end of the Civil War as a sort of social club for former Confederate Soldiers whose influence quickly spread through the decimated Southern states. As Columbia professor Eric Foner wrote in his A Short History of Reconstruction, in its early days, the group was loosely bound by one main principle: launching a reign of terror against Republican leaders black and white. It was never proven that the Confederates founded this. IN fact, Tennessee was actually the least Confederate of all the Confederate states. https://www.lewrockwell.com...It's actually quoted with sources: "There was a New England version of the Ku Klux Klan as well, in the form of roving gangs that conducted "terroristic, armed raids on urban black communities and the institutions that served them" (p. 165). So it turns out the "Klan," like the Black Codes, was a New England invention." White, Liberal Democrats are guilty of what we call the "bigotry of low expectations". They would expect 8 out of 10 from a white man, but only 4 or 5 out of 10 from a black man. Blacks are obviously inferior and need help from the white man because they aren't as capable or smart. These are the same Liberal whites who scream about "white privelege", yet would never give up their "white privelege", but would gladly yell about it in theory to overcompensate for silently pittying the "inferior blacks". Perhaps they should give up their spots at Stanford and/or Harvard to a black man as volunteers. No? Didn't think so. All while? White Republicans assume blacks can do it on their own because: 1)They've seen them do it. 2)They see them as equals and rivals in the workforce and not as inferior, helpless blacks.Now I will prove here that Republicans have just as despicable of a history as Democrats. Now that they are more Democrats.That is generally true about white conservative Southerners, because most Southerners do believe in the equality of man that is said in the "Bible" -- that there is "neither Greek nor Jew." But there is something that at least goes against Republicans (at least those in the North). Granted, Democrats were also against Civil Rights too. but let's look at Senate members who voted against the 1964 bill:https://en.wikipedia.org... "The Senate version: Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor) Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas) Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against) Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%) " In terms of Northerners, and since the numbers are in a "yea-nay" format, more Northern Republicans voted against this bill than Northern Democrats. Althought in the South Democrats had the majority in voting against it. But they were equal. The Democrats replaced slavery with enslavement through "plantation politics". They found it cheaper and easier to enslave the blacks. With plantation politics, you "hire" the black man rather than have him as a slave. You pay less for him, not being directly responsible for his needs. You pay him minimum wages, then flip him a few "extras" here and there. You pay less for him as a worker than as a slave, he appreciates the "extra", which is actually less cost to you, and you buy his loyalty by flipping or promising him a little something extra here and there, all while he is unaware that you are doing it because it's: 1)Not you actually forking out the money, it's the citizens. 2)To get cheap labor. 3)To buy off your vote.That is more exploitation in itself than racism. That's horrible mind you, but that was done to all workers. Cheap labor would also put other races out of a job. It was done with immigration. And then there is Hillary Clinton, the queen of "political correctness" yet the "Queen of lies and fabrications" as well. The very Hillary who wants to bring in masses of migrants, not for multiculturism, but cheap servants. The same Hillary who's foundation is worth billions. Not millions. Billions...The same Hillary who has 1/4 of her campaign openly payed for by the nation behind 9/11 and supporeter of ISIS and Wahhabism.(Saudi Arabia) The same Hillary who whores herself out for votes by promising little bribes to minorities that she doesn't provide one dime for. The Hillary who is "for the poor", yet is one of the biggest capitalists on Earth. The same Hillary who views blacks and Latinos as her inferior servants to the Democratic party. You fetch the water, she'll flip you a nickel from someone elses' pocket.Bro, I'm for the Republicans as much as you, but this isn't about racism, but Hilary's bad policies.