Evolution is fact.

To debate this, obviously, it appears we need a definition Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary states: evo.lu.tion: a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in generations. Agree? Let's divide this debate between macro and micro evolution here are my macro arguments... 1. You never proved evolution. (as the topic said). You simply refuted my few reasons why evolution may be wrong. Can you prove, with out a doubt as fact, that the Neanderthal and Ape come from the same evolutionary chain? I looked at the chart you gave me. Where does it say that there is a REAL link besides similarities. A genetic link maybe? Doesn't have it, so I don't take your missing link argument as fact. So you fail to prove the first part of the definition 2. Ape wouldn't have human child because it is a slow change. Says you. This is why it would never happen. The evolutionist ignores the problem surrounding the human female egg and the male sperm in the evolutionary theory. The female eggs all develop within the ovaries while she is a baby (fetus) within her mother's womb. Evolutionists claim environmental factors cause small changes in the offspring in the evolutionary chain. However, the environmental experience of the female cannot change the chromosomes within her eggs and cannot have any effect upon her offspring. Her body cannot go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at her birth to make an intelligent change. That's why organisms do not evolve from reproduction. So how does evolution change through genetics? Like said before, you give no real reasons why evolution is true. So prove how evolution changes through teh generations. 3. No further evolution because to short a time. Will go into it o micro-evolution 4. All species evolve. Really? so if humans came from the same origin as you say, then why haven't all apes evolved? If all species evolve, why are whole species extinct? Wouldn't they simply evolve and survive? Prove to me that every species has evolved. That burden is yours, not mine. 5. Doesn't matter 6. Rephrasing of my question: What causes evolution? What forces causes evolution? If you can't prove this, you can't prove evolution exists 7. I am aware of the prebiotic soup theory. But that's not far enough. What caused the lightning? What caused the lightning? Where did the pond come from? How did Miller know that methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), hydrogen (H2), and water (H2O) where all together? Can you PROVE AS FACT this THEORY? if not, you have yet to prove the origin of life. But still, what created all the elements? They couldn't spawn from nothing. Law of Conservation of Energy and Mass. How about second law of thermodynamics? Order can not spawn from chaos. Unlike your theories, these LAWS are considered fact by all of the scientific community. That's all reason why Macro evolution is false ON to Micro 1. N/A 2. N/A 3. Examples of micro evolution I still have got no answer on how evolution works. What would cause the change among the moths? I have proved above that generational changes can not be made. Yet that's what is required for evolution. Prove your self right before proving me wrong. 4. Some not others Why didn't all moths develop the same way as the peppered moths? What made them different 5, 6, and 7 all don't apply to micro. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- You have yet to prove why evolution is true. Here is a simple explanation for evolution that may not be right but is a more plausible alternative. A form of natural selection. Unlike evolution, there is no modification in genetics, just common sense. I you want I can go more in depth on natural selection, but like I said, I don't have to prove an alternative.