Re re-upload: God cannot be morally good while giving humans free will

Let me begin by attempting to define 'morally good' as it pertains to this discussion: 'Morally good' is a term I find difficult to fit into a clear-cut, Denotative box. The reason for this is that it depends entirely on what kind of God you are referring to. The many different religious beliefs in this world hinge on their own versions of what they consider to be 'good' and 'bad'. Since you elected not to make this distinction in the first place, However, I will base my definition of 'morally good' on your own definition of God. I define 'morally good', Insofar as it pertains to human beings, As a set of choices and actions that lead a being toward a self-actualized, Purpose-driven life--a satisfaction of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, If you will. I also believe--and this is key--that if God exists and is the source of all moral authority, It follows that our moral code was specifically bestowed upon us by him. Herein lies the crux of my argument. I do not believe your argument is valid because I do not believe that God is bound by the morality he set for human beings. This is because God is our creator. He imposes the rules upon his creation, And his creation must follow accordingly; by no means, However, Is he required to do the same. To put this in another light, When we create things, We tend to also impose our own rules upon our creation; programmers will write programs with a long list of instructions, Scientists will conduct experiments with a detailed set of steps. Even when creating an imaginary world, An author or illustrator will adhere to whatever imaginary laws and standards exist in said world when telling its story. At no point, However, Are these creators required to follow these same rules that they impose upon their world. One may argue that these examples are not valid because the creator is so far removed from their creation that it is impossible for them to follow said rules in the first place; an author cannot, After all, Enter his or her own world and become an inhabitant bound by its laws. It is here that I present my second point. Much in the same way that it is completely pointless to even consider a creator attempting to enter the world of his or her creation, So too do I find it equally pointless to perform the same cognitive exercise with God. I believe that God exists in a dimension of existence that is on such a higher order of magnitude than ours that to even attempt to understand what morality he abides by--if even at all--would be futile. To conclude, And to clearly address your premises: 1. I believe that your first premise is valid. God has given us free will, And in doing so has given us the power to do 'wrong' (according to his moral guidelines). 2. I believe that your second premise is invalid. God has no need to do what is 'right' because our notion of 'right' does not even apply to him. Therefore, Our human perceptions of 'morally good' are inapplicable to God. 3. I believe that your third premise is invalid because it builds on your second premise, Which I believe in turn to be invalid. (Also, I think your third premise would be considered the actual argument. ) Even though this is a debate, I am excited to read your rebuttal, In the hopes of seeing a different perspective and in turn helping me think better. May both of us indeed learn something new.