The Modal Ontological Argument for God's existence is logically valid

However, I do not believe I need much space to explain why the argument is valid if we assume the truth of the first premise for the sake of argument. Modal Logic In modal logic, we infer that if some entity is logically possible then this entity is exists in some possible world. To exist in some possible world however, there must also contain no type of contradiction internally involving this entity. [1] Maximally Great Being A maximally great being is a being with all of what we would call great making properties. Now, it is self evident that it would be greater to exist in all possible worlds rather than simply just one possible world. If another being existed in more worlds than another, then that being would be greater. Thus, if a maximally great being exists in at least one possible world, then necessarily, this being exists in all possible worlds (or else, there would be no way to claim this being was maximally great). [2]The Premises Lets take a look at the premises of the Ontological Argument to see if they follow logically. .P1: "It is possible that a maximally great being exists. "We are going to assume the truth of the first premise for the sake or argument. P2: "If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists in some possible world. "This follows from Modal Logic, as I already explained previously. P3: "If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world. "This follows from the very concept of a maximally great being, as I explained previously. P4: "If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world. "If there is not a single possible world where this being does not exist, then the being must exist in the actual world. This is because out world is obviously possible, because if it was impossible, we wouldn't exist. So, since this being exists in every possible world, the being necessarily exists in the actual world. P5: "If a maximally great being exists in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists. "This is self-evident. P6: "Therefore, a maximally great being exists. "This conclusion follows logically from all the preceding premises. If we assume that premise 1 is true for the sake of argument, then this argument is a logical proof for the existence of a maximally great being. Parodies Some people are under the false impression that this argument can prove anything. For an example, some people think this argument can prove the existence of a maximally great cell phone. However, a cell phone is a contingent and a maximally great being is a necessary being. Some may think that it can prove the existence of a maximally great alien, but once again, an extraterrestrial is contingent to nature and we are discussing that which is completely necessary. Conclusion If we assume that premise 1 of the Modal Ontological Argument is true, then the argument logically proves the existence of a maximally great being ("God"). The logic is very simple once you understand it, and most objections to the logic seem to be misunderstandings of it. Sources [1] . http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] . http://www.doxa.ws...