Communism is an ineffective system and should be abolished

I would like to point out that it is not a false dichotomy. I never suggested that there are only three systems. I was speaking from a perspective of historical determinism which states that capitalism is preceeded always by feudalism and succeeded always by socialism. This is an obvious ad hominem attack that would not stand in any formal debate setting. 1. Your arguments seem to hinge on this tiny little point, unfortunately, its foundations are weak. You cite nothing to back your claims, you simply spew statements about imperfection. I do not propose utopia. Through a long period of a large state everything would be put into the collective and redistributed equally, eventually destroying the state as a repressive body and simply leaving a systematic network of indepdent communes. I do not advocate anarchy, there is a form of a power structure. Society IS a social construct. Indeed, I do not advocate the removal of power structure. Your completel ignorance of marxist theory is astounding. I advocate a long period of government to eventually create the collective unit and slowly wither away leaving for communes to govern themselves. I propose reading Vladimir Lenin's 'What is to be done' You seem to be in a constant contradiction. At one point unemployment rate and the economy were necessary for happiness, now happiness is more imporant? Which is it? Are you honestly suggesting that the united states have a higher equality index? That's is preposterous. Vietnam has a GINI rate of 35 [1] compared to the united state's 41![1] 2. Is this a joke? Have you literally ignored everything I've said thus far? The state should not exist as a repressive body onto itself! The communes are individual governing communities, they have a power structure yet they do not act as a state. The definition of state is: 'a politically unified people occupying a definite territory; nation. ' The state I refer to is the social construct of the ruling class, the bourgeois. The definition of a commune is: 'a small group of persons living together, sharing possessions, work, income, etc., and often pursuing unconventional lifestyles. '[3] Again, the state is not abolished, neither is a power structure. The social construct of the state as a repressive body of the bourges is what must be abolished. Are you really that ignorant? Do you really have no knowledge of history? There have been hundreds of communes. To name but a few: Paris Commune [6], Free Territory [4], Shinmin autonomous region (1929"1932)[5], Revolutionary Catalonia[7], Anarchist Aragon[8] 3. I am not saying that. In fact, I have no idea how this is even relevant...You are aware that mental institutions exist, right? Not to mention, you misspelled half of them. 4. Still not refuted...I await some references and a decent refutation 5. What? That's literally the only response I can give to that statement. How would they lack ambition? Elaborate. You just spewed a declarative statement with no context... Obvious ad hominem attack. Your arguments are atrocious... References: [1]http://data.worldbank.org... [2]http://dictionary.reference.com... [3]http://dictionary.reference.com... [4]Alexandre Skirda (2004). Nestor Makhno: Anarchy's Cossack. AK Press. ISBN 1-902593-68-5. [5]Adams, Jason (2005-12-26). "Non-Western Anarchisms : Rethinking the Global Context. 2: Asian Anarchism". RAforum.info. Retrieved April 13, 2011. [6]Kropotkin, Peter (1895), The Commune of Paris [7]Dolgoff, S. (1974), The Anarchist Collectives: Workers' Self-Management in the Spanish Revolution. In The Spanish Revolution, the Luger P08 was used as a weapon of choice by the Spanish., p. 5, ISBN 978-0-914156-03-1 [8]http://en.wikipedia.org...