Church's chicken is superior to KFC's chicken

I will start with his defense of his contentions, then his attacks on mine. I would like to point out that the things that I will say are not abuse, and I will not be dropping them. You did not set any rules to this debate. I understand if you can not properly refute my points, but just say so instead of telling me to ‘drop them. ' There are still three more rounds. ============================ Argument 1. A You say that even though KFC has more sides than church's chicken, it does not matter. But you yourself said in argument one, "One reason that church's chicken is just so melt in your mouth delicious is because it has a VARIETY of side-dishes…" I pointed out that KFC's chicken also had a large variety, larger than Church's chicken. I later go on to say that KFC's sides are higher in taste, quality, and health. Simply because I did not use words like ‘melt in your mouth' does not change the fact that KFC has better sides. It is the buyer's choice if they want to spend money on a few peppers, or if they want real sides like KFC. Please give me your proof that Church's chicken is ‘cooked to perfection' and ‘melts in your mouth. ' You want me to refute something that you have no evidence on? Church's chicken is indeed not cook to perfecting, or else they would be making lots more money than KFC does. Please, next time provide me with real evidence instead of simply copying and pasting my sources. ----------------------------------------------- 1. B In 1. B you say that we have to assume that the sauces I listed are all the sauces KFC has since I put ect… This is very wrong. Ect is short for etcetera. It means the same as the phrase "and so on. " KFC has many other sauces like Fiery Buffalo, Honey Barbeque, Sweet and Sour, and Colonel Butter spread. I actually do provide you with the ‘ect' in my source. I assume you failed to check it. Again, you said that Church's has a variety of sauce, more everything that KFC has and more. That is wrong; KFC in reality has more sauces than Church's chicken. I agree with you that ‘with more variety comes more taste. ' 1. C In 1. C you say again that church's chicken is "cooked to perfection" and "mouth watering" yet you still fail to provide evidence of this. I could say the same about KFC. Can you refute that without evidence? I wait your proof. --------------------------------------- 2. KGC is popular, but is not as ‘overshadowing' as you make it. KFC still is making a whole lot more money than Church's chicken. ---------------------------------------- Moving to my points, I would like to express that I am somewhat disappointed in you just using one sentence each on my points. But, I shall continue. 1. So? What does that prove except that church's chicken has more carbs? That means it is even unhealthier. This in no way helps your point. It is absurd to think that eating Church's chicken will help you burn calories. You would need many healthier ingredients to help you burn calories. Argument extended. 2. Yes, there actually is evidence. KFC's has always claimed to be fresh, not frozen. Here is a statement from one of KFC's Cooks. You can view it in source 1. "As a KFC cook for nearly 18 years, I've continued the Colonel's tradition of serving my customers KFC Original Recipe chicken on the bone that is delivered and prepared fresh," said cook Tiffany Bakken at the Fort Dodge, Iowa KFC. "While other chains say they make fresh meals, I've experienced firsthand that KFC maintains the highest standards by serving fresh KFC Original Recipe chicken on the bone prepared by a trained cook in our restaurants across the country" Church's chicken on the other hand is frozen. You can read from someone who worked there in sources two. They said. ‘The way they make their chicken is to keep the chicken' in a fridge just on the upside of freezing. ' 3. You say there is no evidence of these herbs. That is why it is called secret. It has been confirmed that the secret exists however. In 2009, KFC moved in an armored truck the secret to Florida. 4. I agree we are talking about KFC fried chicken. But you seem to want to use other things such as sides to amplify the actual chicken. I have agreed to this, and also use desert to prove my point. You say that Church's chicken has deserts in many different forms. This is wrong. The only desert they have it a fried apple pie. You have failed to defend you points properly, and you keep trying to get around the facts. You tell me to drop things because of the ‘abuse. ' The real reason is because you can not refute them. I look for to your response. Also, please don't just copy and paste my sources, do some research of your own. Sources: (1). . http://www.kfc.com... (2). . http://www.recipesecrets.net... (3). . http://www.kfc.com... (4). . http://www.kfc.com... (5). . http://www.churchs.com...