The Judeo-Christian god exists

It is currently time for cross-examination. Before I elaborate, my opponent has plagiarized and has given an automatic forfeit in this debate. Plagiarism is “the act of stealing and passing off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own.” From this website, http://www.everystudent.com..., in the website’s first contention, she has copied, pasted, and edited what it said. The exact paragraph says “The Earth...its size is perfect. The Earth's size and corresponding gravity holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases, only extending about 50 miles above the Earth's surface. If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible, like the planet Mercury. If Earth were larger, its atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, like Jupiter…” Her plagiarized part of the argument was “The Earth is created perfectly. It’s size is perfect. If Earth was just a little smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible. If it were bigger, the atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, making it impossible to live on Earth.” It gives nearly the exact words of the paragraph with minor edits, additions, and deletions. I have underlined the parts of the article that were plagiarized. However, in her last argument, she also plagiarized again. The website, http://biblocality.com..., had this on its list. The exact paragraph said: “1) Two rocks or any elements banging together which have no consciousness or conscience produce beings with consciousness and conscience. Really? 2) ……. 3) Something can’t come from nothing. Since the universe can’t cause itself, there must exist the uncreated Creator, for no other option exists. Cosmologists call this the Transcendent Causal Agent. 4) …… 5).... 6) Since most atheist scholars concede a) Jesus was a real person, b) he really died on the cross and c) the disciples truly believed they had seen him resurrected on more than one occasion in various group settings, the burden of the proof falls on the atheist to come up with a naturalistic explanation for these facts or give His life to Christ if he were to be intellectually honest with himself. 7) …..” I did not want to waste character space so I “…” the parts of the article that were not plagarized. Now her own arguments were “Two rocks or any elements banging together which have no consciousness or conscience produce beings with consciousness and conscience. Really? Something can’t come from nothing. Since the universe can’t cause itself, there must exist the uncreated Creator, for no other option exists. Cosmologists call this the Transcendent Causal Agent. Since most atheist scholars concede a) Jesus was a real person, b) he really died on the cross and c) the disciples truly believed they had seen him resurrected on more than one occasion in various group settings, the burden of the proof falls on the atheist to come up with a naturalistic explanation for these facts or give His life to Christ if he were to be intellectually honest with himself.” Anyways, at first, for the first reason, I was a bit skeptical if you were actually plagiarizing or not but this is a clear act of plagiarizing. I declare this debate to be officially over because any debater can tell you plagiarism is an act of misconduct. You have ruined this debate and the quality of it.