People should be allowed to wear what they want.

I thank my opponeet to have accepted this challenge. I really expected more valid argumentations supporting his contrary point of view. First of all i would like to specify that my phrase " people should be allowed what the want" obviously regards clothes worn according to specific religious prescriptions. But looking more in deep, the problem is more complicated and not simply exhausted by superficial consideration. First of all i feel to invite my opponent to better understand the significance of wearing the veil. The meanings of the vail are more complicted. Veil practices may be experienced as liberating or oppressive bu different women in the same society depending on variables such as religiuos commitments, socio economic ckass, age, race, ethnicity and the particularities of living in a multicultural society. Not all knows that muslim women choose to wear the veil as an expression of their religiuos commitment to Allah and for the benefits and advantages which come from wearing it, as well as a sense of protection from the male gaze. But for this first round just let me explain some basical concepts my opponent missed at all. go back to the born of prejudice about the veil. Since 9/11 Western media sources have developed a visual shorthand for representing Islam. The most common stereotype is that of the veiled woman, a figure that ambivalently straddles both ideals of multicultural inclusivity and the threat of radicalization as context demands. In this usage of the veiled woman as a loaded symbol, western media are continuing an Orientalist history in its representation of Islam, such that Muslim women"s" voices are still being silenced. In this paper, I hope to break this stereotype apart by highlighting the diverse political and cultural contexts in which Muslim women think about the veil, such that the image of the anonymous veiled woman can no longer be read as shorthand for Islam. It is important to state at the outset that the Quran does not thoroughly prescribe how women ought to dress. In one passage, direction is given to observe certain modesties but what is particularly noticeable about this passage is that it is addressed to both men and women. Tell the believing men to lower their gaze and be modest. That is purer for them. Lo! Allah is aware of what they do. And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and be modest, and to display of their adornment only that which is apparent, and to draw their veils over their bosoms, and not to reveal their adornment save to their own husbands or fathers or husbands' fathers, or their sons or their husbands' sons, or their brothers or their brothers' sons or sisters' sons, or their women, or their slaves, or male attendants who lack vigour [sic], or children who know naught of women's nakedness. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. And turn unto Allah together, O believers, in order that ye may succeed. Despite how little the holy book states on the subject of veiling, the woman"s veil has drawn people's attention throughout history and is still widely debated today. The veil or head covering comes in many forms, and individuals from both within and outside the religion have interpreted it in many ways. The culturally diverse practices of veiling lend specific meaning to both how a woman"s dress is read by her immediate community (identification) but also to how a woman chooses to dress (identity). A woman may wear a simple covering of the head with a colorful, black, or sheer cloth known as a hijab. In western countries, the hijab is the main veil that is worn whereas in Iran the chador is prescribed by law under the Islamic Republic. In Afghanistan, particularly under the Taliban, a woman may wear a full face, head, and body covering called the burqa. In Saudi Arabia, a woman commonly will wear a covering with a veil across the face, revealing only her eyes. This is called the niqab. (Petersen). Despite this cultural variance of veiling, and despite diverse interpretations of veiling (whether spiritual, cultural or political), women"s covering in general has in western media often been reduced to symbolize the perceived "wrongs of Islam." Even though Muslim men also follow a dress code, it is women"s veiling that has been the subject of contested debate (Awadalla). Where the Arab man's dress signifies an oppressor or seducer, the women's dress is read as a symbol of the oppressed. By focusing on women"s oppression, the West legitimizes its "war on terror" as one bringing liberation to Muslim women (See Chapter 3). To fully understand how the veil as symbol has come to be loaded with negative connotations in the West, it is necessary to briefly chart the history of Orientalist representation. The scholar Edward Said, from Columbia University, used the term Orientalism to denote the constructed lens through which the West sought to know (and thereby dominate) the East. Prior to Said"s influential book (1978), Orientalism referred to a painterly movement in which the East was romanticized by Euro-American artists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Said"s work shows how the West consistently produced an image of the East as its inverse: where the West was enlightened, the Orient was barbaric; where the West was civilized, the Orient was primitive; where the West was rational, the East was beset by passion. This constructed view or "othering" of the Orient was then used to justify the West"s imperial conquest of North Africa, the Middle East and Asia. This Orientalist lens is still evident today in popular discourse in that people of the East are seen as different and more dangerous than the people of the West. Orientalism then is not assigned to the past, but continues today in people"s preconceived notions about people from the Arab world and what it means to be Muslim. According to Said, a defining moment in Orientalism was Napoleon"s conquest of Egypt. This moment is important to recognize because it created the common notion that the Orient was both different and inferior to the West. When he conquered Egypt, he not only brought in the massive fighting armies, but an army of scientists. These scientists were employed to document how the Arabs functioned for European understanding, indicating that they were not considered the same as people of the West. The underlying power structure implemented by the West created a dynamic where the West was seen to be "discovering" the Arab country. The Arabs became something foreign, examined as a new species and to be experimented with. Thus western colonialisation was an ideological conquest as well as the imperial one. The lens through which the West views the veil today can be traced back to nineteenth century orientalism. Within Orientalist representations, the veil conjures both eroticism and oppression. When countries were first colonized, the Arabian orient was seen as mysterious and alluring, and this was translated by the image of the mysterious yet alluring veiled women (Yegenoglu 39). The veil was understood as a device that kept women apart from men (like purdah and harem), but the desire to penetrate this secretive space of women became a common colonial fantasy, mirroring the larger colonial project to take control of land and resources. The sight of the veiled women evoked erotic fantasies by Western males and drew on their desire for domination. While the seclusion of the women from the public sphere created in the colonizer"s mind an erotic invitation, this desire was entangled with the idea of freeing these women from their backward culture. The reading of the veil as a symbol of oppression originated in writings that depicted Muslim culture as inferior and backwards. Between 1800 and 1950, an estimated 60,000 books were produced about the Arab orient in the West. The purpose of these books was to show colonized Muslims as underdeveloped and in desperate need of "help" from the West. These writings depicted Muslim women as imprisoned by barbaric Arab males, trapped in polygamous marriages, or forced to cover their bodies with the veil . This reading of the veil as a symbol of oppression served to show how Muslim women were entrapped by a violent patriarchy, and their only way out was through the help and intervention of the West. The colonizers not only thought they were the ones that could save the women, but also believed that they could take over societies through the conquering of women. Women in this sense become the key to owning the society.To understand more fully this movement between desire and control, it may be helpful to look to examine a particular example of colonial representation of oriental women. During the French colonial rule of Algeria, a series of postcards depicting Algerian women in an erotic light were printed to send home. These postcards allude to the deeper subconscious force of orientalism. Representations of the political dynamics of colonialism surround these postcards. The photographer"s project is representative of the colonizers", and the female can be read as a metaphor of the terrain to be surveyed and colonized. The woman is sexualized through the photograph, becoming someone who is waiting to be seen. The woman is made to be seen as inviting the Western man to ravish her. This is often affected using the veil that both conceals and reveals the woman"s body, eroticizing and fetishizing her cultural differences. When colonized countries sought their freedom from colonial rule, the colonizer"s romance soured and the veil came to be interpreted less as an invitation and more as a symbol of oppression and/or rejection of Western values. Since the countries were no longer places of mystery, neither was the veil. "The post-colonial imagery has been far less concerned with unveiling than with maximizing the social, cultural and political distance between the 'West' and 'Islam' and conveying a sense of threat through an inversion which emphasizes the most complete forms of female covering, a hyperveiling" . The veil became a way to differentiate the West from Islam. Whereas in postcolonial discourse the veil was taken up as a visual marker of resisting Western imperialism, in neocolonial discourse the veil once again became the marker of the backwardness of the East, and was coupled again by the desire for its removal. However, this time the desire to unveil was not erotically charged desire. Instead, neocolonial discourse equates women"s liberation with a ripping off the veil. Problematically, though, for many Muslim women the veil provides the very means to being freed from being cast as a sexual object. This is where the argument of choice has become an important topic within discussions of the veil . Freedom of choice and religion are often the loudest proclamations made within Western society. Yet, when discussing the veil, it is a common, almost naturalized, reaction, for Westerners to assume a woman wearing the veil is being forced to do so. It is this reaction that enacts what we can call a modern orientalism. "Orientalism is a way of thinking that assumes there is an absolute difference between East and West. According to this logic, the West is seen as rational, developed, human, and superior. In contrast to the East, which is defined as it"s opposite, irrational, underdeveloped, barbaric and inferior." (Professor Alsutany) One of the strongest examples of contemporary orientalism can be seen in media portrayals of Islam. After 9/11, Muslims were stereotyped as threatening terrorists, but this stereotype was not new to 2001 but rather reborn. Media coverage of Iran"s Islamic Revolution had already planted this stereotype of the violent Muslim aggressor in modern America. The power of this stereotype is such that the photograph above of veiled women with blank faces and machine guns would lead many Americans to think that these women are militant radicals. Yet, this picture is actually of the Iranian police force, which has recently allowed women to join their ranks, and thereby would be more accurately interpreted as a depiction of women gaining status within their society. Given the orientalist reading of the veil, it has become "commonsense" in the west that veiled women are oppressed (Hoodfar 8). When political conflicts between the Western and Islamic world erupt, the images that start to appear of Muslim women are fabricated to bring forth maximum emotional reaction from the common person (Lewis). Often, these are of anonymous, veiled women who are denied cultural and/or geographic or even domestic context. They are represented as dark phantoms or sinister totems, silently encroaching upon secular society. For example, during the headscarf controversy in France, the images that were presented alongside news articles would show a woman in a full chador actually located in Iran. This image is the most dramatized image of a Muslim woman, and is perceived to be most threatening to the French Republic (Lewis). Meanwhile, the woman pictured is not even from France, where in fact the majority of Muslim women wear the hijab rather than chador or niqab. In this way, orientalism is strategically used as a lens through which the media seek to invoke certain emotions, especially when there is a political crisis. The following chapters will further demonstrate how the image of the veiled woman is repeatedly used within media to signify a threat and/or obstacle to liberal democracy even though local attitudes to veiling in Iran, France, USA, and Canada vary greatly.. Through the decompression of the meanings that have been overloaded onto the veil, a deeper understanding of the veil may be reached. Through acknowledging the colonial readings of the veil and charting the different political agendas in representations of the veil, this paper seeks to show that these imposed readings often have little bearing on Muslim women"s personal choice to wear the veil which for many is often as much an item of fashion as it is of faith. In so doing this paper seeks to score, what Emma Tarlo has called "the polyphonic resonance" of the veil.