It should be legal to stalk someone

Conclusion My very first point in round one of this debate was that stalking laws are sexist, my opponent was allowed to challenge right away. Even though this was a 5 round debate Con didn't challenge this point until round 4 knowing that I am unable to defend my point with evidence without breaking my own rules. I have proven that women are 4 times more likely to be a victim of stalking, and that 88% of women who are stalked are stalked by men meaning far more men will be punished by this law. This is clearly due to the law being sexist, and not because most enforcement officers are sexist. We can also assume men and women have equal prospects. Con states the above figures are normal or expected but doesn't give any explanation and directs attention to Black people. In America they may make up more than half the prison inmates despite being a small fraction of the population, that's not because they have black skin though or because enforcement officers are mostly racist. It has been proven many times that crime is linked to factors like poverty, education, opportunities etc. Black people are probably not equal in those areas, but there is no reason why men and should women differ unless it is due to sexism. My second point was that people can take responsibility to prevent their self from being stalked. Cyber-stalking is the most common form of stalking, but people can simply block a person's phone number, emails, or other messages, and be more careful on the internet e. g. not let underage kids use social networks, monitor their activity, use a secure password, don't tell anyone their password or other details including those which only stalkers would be interested in knowing. Women can prevent their self being followed late at night very easily e. g. by staying in a group. Stalking laws require a person to keep a log of evidence which mean "victims - typically feminists" must lead someone on e. g. accept their gifts but secretly put them in a sealed evidence bag, basically allow someone to harm them psychologically. Stalking cannot be compared to other crimes, because each individual action which makes something stalking e. g. giving a gift, compliment, or even an insult is actually acceptable. Even if there was a rule whereby having to say stop 5 times makes it stalking, what should the time period be between each time? Thus it is not clear when a crime has been committed unlike robbery or murder where one clearly negative action is illegal. An astonishing 11.5% of stalking reports are false, those falsely accused suffer severely. This is wrong, especially because the so called real victims allow themselves to be hurt emotionally. Strangely my opponent thinks that making stalking legal would cause more people to stalk as they'd "try it out". However Con gives no reason why he would give it a go, or why anyone would waste their money and time. Stalkers are obsessive, you'd have to be in order to make such efforts despite being unsuccessful. By making stalking legal, less people will stalk or think they are stalked (brings down false reports), and there will be less other crimes committed. This is because stalkers will be more likely to seek help due to not being fearful of seeking help. Also stalkers will not make such huge efforts like hack accounts to hide their behavior as they will not fear seeking help. Punishing someone by law who is mentally ill or obsessive is not going to change their behaviour, neither will advising them to act irresponsibly just so they can feel responsible when happily accepting lots of unwanted gifts and unwanted messages i. e. "evidence".