Evolution more rationtal than creationism/god

Hi Pro! I look forward to what looks like being an interesting debate. I will present just the one argument it this debate: Argument from Quantum Mechanics To start with, we need to have a look at one particular experiment - The Double slit experiment. In the experiment, electrons were fired through a double slit; and if it went through both slits, then the electrons were in wave form. If they went through only one slit, then they were in the form of individual particles. What the results showed, was that before measurement, the electrons went through both slits - they were wave functions (potentials). However, upon upon observance, the electrons acted like tiny bits of matter - they only went through one slit. So what they concluded was that the very act of measuring (observing), meant that the wave function collapsed, and turned into matter. [1] So in other words, particles do not exist without observation. This then transverses to the macro world, as proved by by Brukner and Kofler [2], and by other double slit experiments, used with larger molecules [3]. So what we need to see here is that the whole of the macro world is built by the quantum world. To illustrate this, Erwin Schr"dinger set up a thought experiment. [4] he imagined a cat, and some poison in a box, along with some radioactive uranium and a geiger counter. If the uranium decays, it sets off the counter, which releases the poison and kills the cat. Until we open the box, there is no way to determine whether the cat is dead - as quantum decay is a random quantum event. So the question is, is the cat dead or alive? Well, according to quantum Physics, the cat is neither dead nor alive. But this is impossible, obviously. So the purpose of the thought experiment is, nothing is certain until we measure it. Eugene Wigner saw this, and saw the implications of these discoveries. He saw that he, a conscience, looks at the cat, and determines it's existence. Therefore consciousness determines existence! Wigner then made one more step, and asked: "How do i know if i'm alive?" If he determined the cat's existence, then what determines his own existence? We can say that another conscience determines our existence. But what determins that? We will have to go into a regress of consciences, until we reach 'cosmic consciousness' - some consciousness looks down onto the universe, and determines all of our existences. But what about God? Well this fits entirely into the concept of God - a being that exists outside of the universe, that created everything, and sustains it as well; complying also in God's attributes of Omniscience, Omnipresence and immateriality. So we can formulate the argument like this: 1) Molecules only exist when they are observed. 2) We, made of Particles, exist. 3) We, existing, must therefore be observed by another conscience. 4) There is a regress of observers until we reach 'Cosmic Consciousness'. 5) There is therefore a consciousness that exists outside of the universe. 6) We call this observer God. I look forward to the next round. Sources: [1] http://abyss.uoregon.edu... [2] http://meetings.aps.org... [3] http://www.livescience.com... [4] http://www.livescience.com...