It"s time to repeal equal employment laws

I have no idea if there are any other Double_Helix's on this site but my name is another term for human DNA and the 46 strands in it. I can appreciate my opponents humor and enjoy it. I never claimed my opponent personally was a bigot but only that some of his terms in his opening round could lead one to think his was. I kinda feel that this debate has lead us into his ex-marriage more than. My opponent then negates his own resolution of equal opportunity employment by agreeing that people are treated unfairly, hence needing the law. Then he goes about saying that it is the legislators job and it is not their job to produce outcomes, I agree. He then precedes into telling us how they pull of the task of ensuring their laws are followed and successful. I really think this helps my position. He gives us a example of the EU propose of declaring that employers make their supervisor boards 40% women. I agree, this is harsh and demanding. Though it has no effect overall on the overwhelming help that equal employment opportunities bring. Let's take a long look at his scenario: I see that this declaration is not even passed yet and therefore is not even a problem at this point. . http://www.bbc.co.uk... It seems that the proposals will now not be debated until November. At the moment, less than 15% of board positions in EU member states are currently held by women. I can see there concern my opponent has but is his main reason for wanting to take equal opportunity off the board is because it could lead to a woman being appointed before him. I can see that time and effort he has put into the job and someone who has done less maybe should not be promoted before him. Though is the woman promoted less qualified or capable of doing the job given? The idea of equal opportunity is that everyone, regardless of race, gender, or creed, should get the opportunity to have the same level of jobs. That they can have the same opportunity of high school or college. If you look at it from an economic perspective, this can be good for competition and growth. This lessens affirmative actually having much of an affect today because there are qualified minorities. This can benefit both employees and employers. For the workers, it means they are never without a recourse if they experience job discrimination. For employers, it creates opportunities for a workplace free of bias. Not all capitalist environments work up to standards that are desired but this doesn't mean that they fail. It is true that sometimes the just do not always get what is deserved and sometimes the less deserving are rewarded. But, we can not just look at a few examples but the overall picture. The whole picture gives us the outlook that many are treated with fairness. That alot of people who otherwise would be overlooked are put in the picture for the future. If the our leaders and government was not there to help the less desired or fortunate then we would live in a world were only the favorite excel. The world leans that way by nature and this tilts the side back to those are not the up most desired. In the end, this system works for the good. It allows people to get jobs that otherwise they mite not have had the chance to obtain. It allows everyone the chance for education so they can earn the jobs that even the most highly educated can obtain. This law can not be took away because if it were then there would a rapid increase in biased behavior.