Corporate personhood should be repealed

My opponents first statement is a quote from a supreme court justice, and the quote itself is highly flawed. Many of the things it states are false, they have beliefs, thoughts, desires, feelings, all of the above. Why? Because a corporation is a person, how is it a person? It is run by people. These people want money, have goals, have feelings, and believe in whatever they believe. The quote is false as it ignores what runs the corporation.Rc1: Definitions I will use a more... accurate definition, and the definition from oxford dictionaries is one regarded as a person. [1] Now, one must first ask is a corporation considered a person? As the resolution states "repeal" the cooperate person hood, we can assume for the context of the debate the law recognizes corporations as people. As the definition only requires recognition, this here on the bat is a link to person hood. But lets assume her definition is correct. But this isn't the case as she defined human, when the resolution stated personhood. She should define person. But I will refute her premise right off the bat of a human is relating to characteristics of humans. [2] Now, a corporation still has this: guess who owns the corporation? People do! Case closed.Rc2: Rights The basis of my opponents argument here is it takes away rights, which is not the case. Assuming a corporation is a person, debarring them of this recognition is actually unfair. My opponents argument lies on they pass agendas, I do not see how this is a problem. Sure, it is unmannerly, but is it truly a take of freedom? My opponents argument is we cannot speak loudly enough, but this is quite false, I think the 99% movement, the tea party, the ron paul revolution ALL did well, without being a corporation. A large movement is just as powerful as a corporation, the tea party kicked a lot of people out of the house in 2010. My opponents argument is essentially false. Rc3: No limits on campaign funds If I prove the premise in my argument a corporation is a person then they are then justified to have no limits. __________________________________________________________________________________________________=Case=P1: All corporations are people P2: Not giving them this right is discrimination P3: This violates the 1st and 14th amendments C: Keep corporate personhood Defending P1:All corporations are in fact people. Who runs them? Robots? The fact is they are run by individuals, just like you and me, just a little more money ;). Corporate success helps people, corporate failures hurt them. They are run by people, get taxed, get sued, speak, advertise, donate, argue, fund etc. [3] As stated all a person needs is human attributes, [2] or recognition [1], as this is the case corporations are people. Just because your name has the letters CEO =/= non human, the rich are a class of people too. Defending P2:As stated in the deceleration "all men are created equal," [4]. As corporations are people, denying them personhood is discrimination and then does not make all men equal, all men are equal, minus GM. As I have proven my point P1 coupled with P2 = no corporate personhood? Discrimination. Defending P3:---> 14th amendment "The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. " [5]Making them not human contradicts the laws and procedures they can accomplish. Banning corporate personhood = unconstitutional under 14th amendment grounds.---> 1st amendment "The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference." [6]Not alloeing them to fully contribute funds infringed on the expression part of the 1st amendment. C: Therefore keep Corporate personhood_________________[1] http://oxforddictionaries.com... [2] http://www.merriam-webster.com... [3] http://www.nationalreview.com... [4] http://en.wikipedia.org... [5] http://www.law.cornell.edu... [6] http://www.law.cornell.edu...