pandemic!

I will be refuting then defending. 1. Nowhere in my argument did I say that citizens would not be able to use guns, but I suggested the Army instead. Please explain why America would turn into a communistic plot. You can not claim something without explaining how it would happen. In the previous argument I explained how to would benefit the world greatly by forcing everyone to disarm and fight the animals instead of the people. Nowhere in your law did you say that we could not eat the animals. So it would not be going against your peace treaty. Therefore we could still hunt, and the people who put the law into play would not have anything to complain about. 2. I did not say that a breaking of the nose would not be painful; I was simply saying that it would be a very minimum amount of pain. I stated the reason why above. Okay, you want to assume that the noses would bleed because it is the original plot. Well, I will accept your idea, although it was not in the title of your plot. You said that there would be a pandemic if everyone's noses broke. Okay, if everyone's nose broke and blood came out, it would not be that bad. A little blood would come out, but our noses automatically clot to stop the bleeding. A nose bleed can heal itself within a few minutes. Not everyone would get HIV since the blood would be so minimal. A baby CAN breathe through there mouth, babies are not stupid. And if a nose broke, it would not stop them from breathing. A nose break does not make someone not be able to breathe. Elderly people are less susceptible to pain, so they would feel the break even less. Therefore they would not have a heart attack, which is very extreme. 3. You said, "Being smart means having intelligence enough to make logical and practical decisions" There are many definitions of smart, but to be kind I will accept your definition of "smart." Although I accept your definition, everyone is still smart. Babies still know that they need to nurse. It is a ‘logical and practical decision.' People know that they need to drink, that also is a ‘logical and practical decisions.' Therefore, everyone would still be abducted. ===================== DEFENSE =================== 1.You say that most of the time it is one party who is drunk fighting another party who is not drunk, where are these fact? You also say that most people become friends after these fights, where are your facts about that? Hollywood movies usually depict what you speak of, but not real life. Being drunk makes people lose their good judgment. This is why so many people do stupid things like fight with each other. View the videos of the fights, both people in these fights are dunk. We can all think of people with temper problems, can you imagine these people drunk? People do have hangovers, even if they continue drinking. It is when your body can not take it anymore. Also, if you drink water during a hangover it is even worse for you. The hangovers would be never ending. A mildly drunk person may be able to know that there in the woods, but a person who drank two cups of vodka probably wouldn't even know if they are on plant earth. There is no way they would even be able to hunt. Also, who would make the bullets? We have a few, but they would run out in about month. No one would be able to make the guns or even sell them. Like I said before, it would take years and years to adapt to the alcohol. Some people drink vodka everyday and are still get sick and drunk. Orange juice is different than Vodka. And our bodies do not really ‘adapt' to the drink. It simply takes what it needs from it. 2.I have viewed your video, and like I have said for the past two arguments, some people would not be able to get a wheelchair or, pegs, or the stuff they have. They also both got surgeries to help them function like they did. Many people can not even afford shoes! Even though those people can do somethings, they can only do it because other people make the things for them. The man with no arms can not make clothes. If everyone walked on their hands, they could not do things like cook dinner. We can not assume that everyone will have things made for them. We can not walk on our hands and carry groceries at the same time. In the end, there would be panic, and pandemic. Also, if everyone's legs were chopped of, there would be mass blood loss. Some people can not lose that much blood. It would be different if it was something like a nose bleed, but a leg bleed would be detrimental. 3.Like I said in my first point, it takes years and years to adapt to something. Let me ask you this, if our bodies can adapt to HIV as fast as you say they can, how come HIV never leaves peoples bodies? Same thing with other STDs, they never leave. There is no one in Africa that have adapted to the HIV virus, they all must stay away from it as much as possible. Our bodies do produce white blood cells to protect us, but not to certain things such as HIV's. Something else that you must realize is that we would all die within three days. Our bodies need water to survive; we could not live off of blood. And our bodies could not adapt to it in three days. Once everyone realize that they are all going to die, there would be chaos all over the world. I look forward to your last response. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com...