Hitler was one of, if not, the most evil being in history

IntroductionI have been mulling taking a CON position on this resolution as well, but for now will first take the opposite, conventional end of the argument, that Hitler was indeed quite evil. As CON did not stipulate otherwise, and since CON instigated this debate, I will assume that CON has burden of proof. Regardless, my rebuttal will more than likely provide enough substantiation to satisfy proof for a PRO position.CON's arguments are short, relatively unsubstantiated, and overall not very compelling. I will do a line-by-line refutation to demonstrate why.RebuttalR1) "The actions of the English and Danish empires have resulted in more suffering, oppression, massacres, rapes, etc, than any death Hitler took. "This is simply not true. One hundreds years of global conflict resulted in a lower death toll than what Hitler caused in less than 6 years by initiating WWII. In the 19th century, the death toll worldwide from 100 years of conflict was around 45 million (http://necrometrics.com...); the death toll from WWII was 56 million (http://www.hitler.org...).R2) "England and Denmark had slavery, and have always been way more snobby too."Concentration camps also used slave labor. Unlike the English and Danish experiences, the Nazis did not afford slaves the dignity of rising out of slave status; instead they were going to be gassed one way or another.Jews that were forced to clean the gas chamber that killed millions of their brethren were only prolonging the inevitable. The only reason Henryk Mandelbaum survived this experience is because he deserted during a forced death march to flee from the Red Army. (http://articles.latimes.com...)R3) "lol Jim Crow came from the English."The story is American.R4) "And oppression of blacks in the America is not over, just that now instead of blacks being lynched and openly harassed, many unfortunately live in the tragedy known as housing projects, as pioneered by racists such as Lyndon Johnson."While the treatment of blacks in America was indeed atrocious, what Hitler accomplished during the 6 years of WWII was far worse in intensity and lack of human dignity, especially in the treatment of Jews. Furthermore, no one man is responsible for American slavery, whereas we can point to Hitler's Mein Kampf to deduce where Nazi Germany got its genocidal tendencies towards Jews.R5) "Abraham Lincoln also led vicious wars against the Sioux people. Then you have Danish atrocities against the Inuits in Greenland.To call Hitler the most evil is a massive mistake."Again, those wars pale in comparison to the death caused by WWII. Conclusion Hitler was one of, if not, the most evil being in history because we can attribute much of Nazi ideology and the atrocities that sprang from it to one man - Adolf Hitler. Lincoln's wars against Indians were far less brutal and in comparison far more humanistic. Almost any form of institutionalize slavery ever conceived by man was far less brutal and far more humanistic than what the Nazis perpetrated in camps like Auschwitz, and such camps were the brainchild of Hitler himself. The death that the Nazis under Hitler caused in 6 years of war outweighed all of the death caused by 100 years of global conflict in the 19th century.I have refuted the entirely of CON's argument, and will await his response.