The Christian God is the likeliest of all the gods from thoughout time.

Again, rebuttals first. 1. & 2. Just because Pro doesn't accept my reasons why the other gods are more believable doesn't mean the arguments weren't there. God's claim to perfection doesn't automatically make His existence impossible, but it does make Him less likely and believable than other gods who make no such claim. As I said, this debate isn't about the existence of God in general, but the likelihood of it in comparison to the other gods. Say you meet two people on the street. One says he works in a fast food place and one says he is a billionaire business mogul. The trouble is, they are both wearing the same kind of K-mart knock off. Who is more believable, the one who admits the truth, or the one who makes an extraordinary claim which at face value seems impossible? 3. He brings His judgement to those who deserve it? How is eternal suffering an appropriate punishment for simply having your own mind and the gall to make an informed opinion based on the evidence? Cruel and unusual punishment cannot be the policy of a perfect being. 4. Create and produce are two words that mean basically the same thing. Now Pro is just arguing semantics. Through reproduction, people make other people who have the potential to be greater than them. 5.I am not required to show evidence against God's perfection, though I am willing. I am only required to show how that claim to perfection makes Him less likely to exist than the other gods, which I have done. 7. Just because Pro doesn't want to see the contradictions doesn't mean they aren't there. He claims that omitting doesn't count, but you have to look at what is being omitted. Is it really logical to think that something as major as an earthquake or an angel descending from heaven was really unimportant enough to only be mentioned in 1 of the 4 accounts? In Pro's example, the more relative situation would be if the store was robbed, Bob stopped it, and the store owner gave him his stuff for free out of gratitude. Then when he got home, he just mentioned he saved some money at the store. These are huge events they are leaving out. Also, the contradictions are more than just omissions. The angel came and rolled away the stone. This is found in Matthew 28-2, even though it is not a direct quote. The use of the word "the" in this context implies that there was just one angel. Also, Pro claims that just because it doesn't describe them going in doesn't mean they didn't but the surrounding context shows they were still outside. In the same verse it says he rolled back the stone and sat on it. If a stone serves as a door to a cave and can be rolled away, then the stone has to be on the outside. This puts the conversation outside because if an angel was speaking directly to you, I can promise you wouldn't be listening from inside a cave. To do so would be too disrespectful. Also, there is the aspect of time. Matthew 28-1 says at dawn, Mark 16-9 says just after sunrise, and John 20-1 says while it was still dark. The time of day might not be that important of a detail, but it does show an inarguable contradiction. Also, Mary does not use the word "we" in Pro's example until she is back with the disciples. In fact, while she is at the tomb, only singular pronouns are used. Also, the conversation between Mary and the angels is different in John. The biggest contradiction is that Mary left and came back in John, but in all the others just approached and eventually the angel(s) showed up. Also, the reason I said there are no common facts is because even those events that take place in all of them happen differently. Also, the rising wasn't actually described in the gospels, just the angels' telling of it. 8. I never said you can't look in the bible to prove it's claims, that is the only way to verify or falsify it's claims. I said you can't just say the Qu'ran is false because it contradicts the bible, you have to show evidence why your holy book is more reliable. Arguments "When we say that Jesus Christ was produced without sexual union, was crucified and died, and rose again and ascended to heaven, we propound nothing new or different from what you believe regarding those whom you call the sons of Jupiter" Justin Martyr, early church father There are many gods who have many things about there stories that they share with Jesus, but in the interest of time and not bogging down the argument, I will only list three. Horus was born of a virgin, had stars appear at his birth, turned water into wine, had 12 disciples, and was associated with the lion and the lamb. Mithras was born of a virgin, was baptised in water, was considered a travelling teacher or master, had 12 disciples, performed miracles, celebrated communal meal with bread, held Sunday sacred, born on Dec. 25, visited by wise men upon his birth, resurrected on 3rd day, and was buried in a cave-tomb. Thor was the son of a god, betrayed by his brother, forsaken by his father, died and resurrected, was considered the savior of humankind, and fell in love with a woman who sent against his teaching and beliefs. With these and many other similarities, it is logical to assume that all these religions had one source, and since Christianity is a fairly new religion, it couldn't have been the source. I have more arguments, but will forfeit the round in a couple minutes, so I'm afraid that's all for now.