The existence of Telepathy

As I analyze the link provided in support of pro's position, I found exactly what I had expected to find- statistics. The article, dated March 2014 indicates that the information was recently updated, and provides us with a more up to date analysis of research from telepathy supporters. Going back to the link provided, it states that, "It usually occurs between people who have strong bonds or emotional connections." gives us an idea of who would be involved in this experiment. The experiment involves 5 participants; 4 callers and a test subject. The callers were selected at random and the subject made their guesses before answering. The expectancy rate stands at 25% in the article provided above, and the results averaged to be approximately 40%. Videotaped the subjects had approximately 45% rate of success. When asked a level of confidence before answering the calls, each subject reportedly had an 85% hit rate when confident, 34% when not confident, and 28% when just guessing. So according to the statistics, the subjects had a success rate of approximately 50% or higher with callers they knew, but when strangers were introduced in the experiment, the results averaged to the expected 25%. And lastly, I would like to look at the statistics provided with people whose loved ones are still across the world as opposed to those friends near by averages to approximately 61%-36% in favor of those of whom they had a strong emotional connection. In these experiments, the links claims to have tested tens of subjects in a series of hundreds of tests with a phenomenally steady results. Going back to the past month, my family members have contacted me approximately seven times with an anticipated rate two out of seven or 28.57% and my girlfriend at approximately six out of nine time or 66.66%. When summed the average equals eight out of sixteen or 50%, the same statistics provided in the link above. My sergeants have contacted me, four times in which was anticipated one time equal an 25% but I could not have guessed who would have contacted me at the time so this would have brought my statistics back down to 0%. In every case, these individuals have contacted me for a very specific reason, including just to say, "Hi, how are you doing?" Or "What's up"? Could this have been a matter of coincidence, that I was thinking of that person before I looked to see who it was that contacted me? The chances of rolling a six, seven, or even an eight on two dice are much higher than any other number, because the combinations which add up to six, seven, or eight is much higher than that of any other combination on the dice. To explain how this relates to my scenario is the fact that these people were more likely to contact me than any body else, due to reason (including emotional reasons). In fact, when I make a negative comment toward an individual this increases the chance that they may contact me, a family member, an important figure in their lives, or even a law enforcement officer may show up on my doorstep. So is it just a matter of coincidence that I could anticipate who contacts me with an anticipated rate above the average expectancy rate in the link above? With an of who I am dealing with, I can sum up the probability of who I will be hearing from. However, in this specific experiment the callers were selected at random, with a consistency in the number of anticipated results. Is it possible that they could have eliminated the possibility of a statistical illusion? A stage magician might start with a basic trick, and eventually figure out new ways to perform the same illusion in order to make it seem a little more convincing. Sir Isaac Newton once said that, " We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances." Computers are known for their usage of algorithms, and the human mind is kind of weird, how it works. Until we can come up with a theory (which is supported by multiple strands of evidence) we cannot really understand why, or how these experiments reached such high results- assuming the accuracy of the article provided above. If there seems to be a strong connection between loved one's that will allow them to share information in the mind, over long distances; what would be the underlying causes? Would it be something like the four fundamental forces of nature? To explain, during interaction, some matter particles, such as an electron or quark, would emit a force carrying particle. The recoil would change the velocity of the matter particle, and the collision would change the velocity of the second particle as if there had been a force between the two particles. Is this the information our brains would interpret? Please provide us with your thoughts. Thank you for your time.