Resolved: The United States ought Submit to Jurdict an international court design to prose CAH

Response Value Criterion But I don't think International court can prosecute these things. You said 'we prosecuted nazi war criminals and here are just several more that are in front of the court right now Situation in Democratic Republic of the Congo Situation in Uganda Situation in Central African Republic and another thing' but, the international tribunal can only prosecute the losers of the war. (cite from : 'Secret and Lies', by David Southwell, I refer to the Korean Version) 1. The incident of the gulf of Tonkin was manipulated by USA government because USA government want to start war with Vietnam. There were no attacks against USA warships. From that time, many war crimes committed that can be as compared as Holocausts.(P.65~66, 'War' part) 2. England also committed war crimes in WW2. They commit genocide and torture to war prisoners, even after the war was ended.(P.67~68) But, the criminals are never prosecuted, NEVER. If they are soldiers of Germany, they were sentenced death penalty and died.(P.67~68, 'War' part, 'Are the war crimes by winners innocence?) 3. The Leaders in USA and UK justified the War of Kosovo by using unexisting genocide. Serbian have no crimes that the leaders in USA and UK argued. Still, international tribunal can only judges weak crimes. Aid from USA are not really help to realize international justice. You say it can be solved by directing USA government by international tribunal. But how? Related 'onto your arguments in my contention 1' You just say 'International court' can do more clear judges and monitors than USA government without suggesting the detail plan. In addition, you still do not reply my questions. So, Question again and edit. First, Do you really think international court can more collect evidence to protect human rights and are not affected from international interest related to superpowers or other countries? Do you have an detail idea? Second, although USA government have many failure to protect human rights, what make this problem can do the powerful reason to support international court? The expense of support, we can more pressure to the USA court to check the illegal acts of USA government Related 'contention 2' But, not helped by international court, we can still prosecute war criminals. I did not argue 'if nations are committing crimes against humanity then it is a crime against the world so it is ever one problem like the holocaust that effected everyone didn't the world have the right to stop it'. In this case, superpowers can prosecute these criminals to the court of the country of criminals like the case of Saddam Hussein. In addition, the problems of expense still remain. I cite these things from this site. (http://www.idebate.org...) 'The ICC will generate crippling expenses. Cautious estimates suggest an operating budget of $100 million per year. The costs of the ICTY and ICTR have already spiralled out of control, and the latter tribunal has a legacy of maladministration and internal corruption. The US contributes 25% of the budget for both the tribunals, which amounted to $58 million in the fiscal year 2000. It is dubious whether the ICC could survive without US financial support. The UN as a whole is obligated only to fund investigations and prosecutions initiated at the request of the Security Council. Every other investigation must be funded by assessed contributions from the States that have ratified the Rome Statute. Although the UN could authorise the transfer of additional funds, the procedure would require a UN Security Council resolution that would of course be subject to the US veto. Alternatively, it is accepted that State Parties to the Statute could directly contribute funds or personnel to the ICC. However, the possibility of partiality or even corruption is manifest where States with their individual political interests are deploying and directing their own staff within the Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC.' In a nutshell, You still say if USA join international court, the situation of violating human rights reformed, but not showing me the detail system and plan. So, Your arguments still lack evidence. I'll wait your reply.