There Is No Proof of God

I haven't personally checked that manuscript, but no-one has given criticism from that manuscript or even made the claim that it is difference. If there is a difference anyone is open to show, but they don't. The only difference is that this manuscripts doesn't have vowels, but the words are still complete and there. Vowels don't have to be written, they're optional and are mainly used for people who are new to Arabic. I really don't see your point about Jesus? Jesus came with a message, we have proof of that. The prophets in the Bible are also in the Qur'an. The Bible is full of contradictions and Christianity is the only Abrahamic faith where the doctrines are different. Jesus spoke Aramaic and so he called God Alaha, one of the evidences of my claim is the term "hallalujah". If we look at the dead sea scrolls and original manuscripts we can see continuous changes. The Gospel is preached throughout the Bible. When Jesus supposedly was on the cross (as Christians believe), he called out "elahi elahi lama sabachtani". We are the ones that ask the Christians "Where is the gospel of Jesus", not the other way around. You used 5:67 and used trinitarian Christians killing unitarian Christians as an example. I already told you countless of times, Allah has given men free will. People kill other people. Why would Muhammad SAW and his followers fight if Allah can just kill the polytheists with lightning or something? He doesn't, end of story. Why are you blaming God for men's mistakes? This is a really emotional way of thinking and this is also why people are leaving religion, they say "Oh well if God existed this wouldn't happen!". This is not rational, but emotional. And We will surely test you with something of fear and hunger and a loss of wealth and lives and fruits, but give good tidings to the patient, (Qur'an 2:155) Here's a quick and full response on your question about (35:8): http://www.answering-christianity.com... You used WikiIslam as a source, but if you go to the main page of WikiIslam then you can see... "Welcome to WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam that ANYONE can edit." WikiIslam has pages like 9/11, Islam and propaganda, inspiration of Muhammad, Bin Laden, Pedophilia, Satanic verses, Allah the Deceiver, etc. Use your authentic sources please. The website even goes out to call Dawah lies, so what can you really understand from this website? You can go ahead and use the real wikipedia or Islamic sources. Regarding the linguistic miracle The challenge must be examined by specialised and trustworthy people when it is brought forth, Allah says bring your witnesses doesn't he? The challenge must hit the reader physically and spiritually. Prophet Muhammad did not convert others by changing sticks to snakes, or splitting seas in half, or by raising the dead, or by curing the blind, or by performing any of the Miracles that Allah Almighty's Messengers did in the past peace be upon all of them. Prophet Muhammad came with a Book revealed to Him by Allah SWT. You could see what effect this book had on people. If language in the Qur'an seems illogical then that logic needs to be rechecked because we've always seen the Qur'an as the ultimate miracle with no errors. Someone can say that a verse has an illogical construction, but they can't say it's wrong. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Muhammad SAW couldn't have been a liar either. He was always seen as "the trustworthy", he had the best wives, he had wealth and everyone liked him. Why would he give that up? He was offered money, power and women for one thing in return and that was to end his religion. At the time of his death he was pennyless, at one point of his life he had to eat leafs. When someone lies it is always for some worldly gain, he lost everything instead. He lost many followers, his wives and his children because of his religion. So we can see from his biography that he was not a liar. I am kind of busy now, so maybe we can talk about this later.