Some authentic Hadeeths show that Prophet Mohammad was neither highly moral nor well-mannered

I assure him that the burden of proof is on me (as I stated in the rules of this debate). My role is simply to provide authentic hadeeths which contradict Prophet Mohammad's highly-regarded morals and manners, while his role is to provide effective refutations. 1- Concerning my first reason I'm going to present the chain of narrations as my opponent requested, although I had already provided the exact source of the hadeeth and its official ruling in the first round. Fortunately, this hadeeth has only one narrator. (1) إذا رأيتم الرجل يتعزى بعزاء الجاهلية ، فأعضوه بهن أبيه و لا تكنوا الراوي: أبي بن كعب المحدث: الألباني خلاصة حكم المحدث: صحيحTranslation: Narrator is Abi Bn Kaeb, Speaker is Albani, Official ruling on the authenticity of the narration: Authentic. There are also other hadeeths identical to this one which are authentic. .. and I shall present more if my opponent disregards the official ruling given on the authenticity of this particular one, which says that the Prophet Mohammad commanded, "If you saw a man doing the jahliya's funeral rituals, make him bite his father's pen! s and don't hesitate. " 2- Concerning my second reason:My opponent gave us the context of the third hadeeth with only one counterargument. He also commented on the use of the word "struck" instead of "push" in his own translation, although mine did not include the word "struck. " As a native Arabic speaker, I used the word "push" because that is exactly what the Arabic word translates to, and we both seem to agree on that particular translation.2A- Refutation of my opponent's counterargument: My opponent provides a citation which shows that "pushing" could be metaphorical for pushing the evil out. However, his citation is about a man who pushes/strikes his own chest to drive the evil out. I have to remind my opponent that what is discussed here is about being pushed by another person, and that the push caused Aisha "pain," which means that (1) it is not a well-mannered way of teaching her something, and (2) it could be regarded as a sign of domestic violence. Here is the citation again, "He pushed me and caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you? " [Saheeh Hadith-Book 004, Number 2127]My opponent then provides another citation of Mohammad doing the same thing. I shall treat this as further evidence for a lack of refined manners and high morals. Even if the Prophet did it for religious reasons, it remains wrong. Imagine a practice of sexually molesting an infant to drive the evil out. Such an act is not justified just because it was done because of religious reasons.3- Refutation of my opponent's argument: "I find it hard to believe that a man who puts such a high price upon good manners, can be a barbarian or an immoral person of any sort. "This is an argument from personal incredulity. Hence, a weak one. That man could easily be a hypocrite or someone that can't follow what he preaches(e. g what was offered by my opponent in his last citations). Take for example Rabbi Shammai who preaches that a person should greet people with cheerfulness[1], and yet he has been caught in many situations where he would chase gentiles with a measuring rod(large stick)[2]. In addition to this, people might dictate rules of politeness and love, in order to fight their own mischief, rudeness and lack of manners. In other words, to say that "he created great rules on manners" doesn't entail "he couldn't have violated them" or "he was a great moral person himself. " Saying that is actually committing a non-sequitur logical fallacy. Moreover, I never said Prophet Mohammad was a "barbarian" to begin with. I only said that he is not as well-mannered and highly moral as he is described by the majority of Muslims. In summary, my opponent has not yet responded to the first hadeeth in which Prophet Mohammad says, "Make a man practicing certain funeral rituals, bite his own father's pen! s. " Nor did he effectively refute the claim that the Prophet pushing Aisha and causing her pain was an immoral and ill-mannered way of teaching her something. Hence, my position remains that a Muslim can't follow those authentic hadeeths, and consider the Islamic Prophet a well-mannered and highly moral person. I've also noted in the first round that there are other reasons than those two. However, I don't see a good reason to present them in this round, because the two reasons happen to be enough to support my position. [1] Pirkei Avos 1:15 - Teaching of Shammai. [2] . http://www.jewfaq.org...