Canada is not a democracy

You are wanting to debate if Canada is a dictatorship; but the debate is that Canada is not a Democracy, by the legal definition, which requires free sovereign people. You have not posted any document that States when the people became free from colonial rule; or when the people ratified a constitution of the people giving the government any power to govern. You have not posted anything to demonstrate what changes took place in how the government gets its power to govern when you said it was not a democratic government to what changes the people gave the government to make it a democracy. The government as a colonial government swore allegiance to the king or queen and still do as their source of power. Canada is not a democracy and never was. You have the right to vote for whichever indoctrinated politician you want; as long as that politician swears to obey and protect the queen and her laws , not a constitution as would be the practice in a democracy. In the supreme court case refereed to as the Lord Nelson Hotel case the ruling was that the constitution belongs to the people and that neither the federal or provincial governments could change it alone or together; yet that is exactly what was done as is possible in a dictatorship; not a democracy. In a democracy the government can not change the constitution without a referendum by the people. You have not posted the results of any referendum giving the government the power to change the sic B.N.A.Act a British bill as your constitution. Read Federal invasion become permanent. Provincial Taxation Agreement Act, 1942. Canada was a centralized state, it could only remain so by a successful amendment to the BNA Act or by repudiating the Taxation Agreement act of 1942 and refusing to give up control of the income taxes. In the Dominion- provincial conference of 1945-46 Mr. Lisley stated that it was not the intention of the Dominion Government to consider a return to pre-war arrangements and no it is not proposed to seek a constitutional amendment. The act of a dictatorship government, doing what it wanted despite of what the constitution allowed it to do.. The federal government tried twice to legitimize itself by fraud in attempting to get the people to pass an amended BNA Act as their constitution. The Meech Lake Accord 1989 failed, so did the Charlottetown Accord1992.. Her Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the ---enact as follows !. This bill is introduced before consideration of the throne speech to P E R P E T U A T E the established right of parliament through the representatives elected by the people to sit and act without leave from the crown. Assertion of right. 2. This bill theiefor asserts the right to give precedence to matters O T H E R than thouse expressed by the Sovereign This demonstrate a dictatorship as the government can not do what it wants but only what her majesty allows. In a democracy the government could give precedence to matters given to it by a constitution without any restrictions by her Majesty. Your CRA is not your government agency but agencies of the IMF. You have no constitutional right of innocent or a fair trial in tax court, which would be the case in a democracy. Who would be stupid enough to give the CRA such powers; only indoctrinated people who believe they have a democracy , when in fact they have a dictatorship. Ask your government to provide you with its bank balance ? It has no bank balance as it is in receivership to the IMF. How can a democratic government have no bank account to which it writes cheques on ? How can Cheques which are not issued on any bank account be honoured by the banks . Only because Canada is not a democratic government but a government controlled by the IMF.