Due to his Utter Existential Hopelessness the Believer in atheist Dogma Should Commit Suicide

My opponent wrote: "have been in inferring the state of mind every atheist" The argument in my OP makes no statements whatsoever about any "atheist," so that is a straw man logical fallacy on your part. "you have an erroneous understanding of the frame of mind of an atheist." No I don't, and in fact, there is no such thing as an atheist. " Atheism can, in fact, coexist with happiness and optimism." I never claimed otherwise, so that is a straw man logical fallacy on your part. "drawing unfounded conclusions" Without God,. nobody could make an objective distinction between founded conclusions and unfounded ones. "assertion that atheists" The argument in my OP never made such an assertion, so that is your straw man logical fallacy. "befall the religious as well." Believers in atheist Dogma ARE religious. "atheism or any belief one may hold has nothing to do with whether or not they experience the cited misfortunes." I never claimed it did, so that is just another straw man logical fallacy on your part. " Any individual who believes that by virtue of the fact that they hold religious beliefs" I never made such a claim, so that is another straw man logical fallacy on your part. Also, the belief in atheist Dogma IS a group of religious beliefs. "truly delusional" Without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between reality and delusion. ". That point you raised has thus been proven to have no merit whatsoever. " Actually, you have only thus far addressed your own straw man logical fallacies, and have utterly failed to even address any of my actual statements. "n atheist does not fall into depression simply because they do not" I never made any such claims, so that is just another straw man logical fallacy on your part. "An atheist has many things to look forward to -" Not true, because there is no such thing as an atheist. "looked forward to by the religious." Believers in atheist Dogma ARE religious. "Pleasures of this nature are, in and of themselves enough to keep a person optimistic and cheerful about life." That is your subjective, faith-based, unsupported religious belief, not observable science. " I will briefly delve into science and say that many of these pleasures are due to the release of dopamine in the brain." No they aren't. " The same chemical is excreted by the brain when one reaches the goals they had preset for themselves." No it isn't: That is your own personal faith-based religious belief, not observable science. "an atheist can find great joy in life by achieving their goals." No he can't, because there is no such thing as an atheist. "You mentioned that an atheist" The argument in my OP does not make any such statement, so that is another straw man logical fallacy on your part. "their understanding is that they will die anyway and nothing comes after that." I did not actually say that either, so that is another one of your straw man logical fallacies. "Where you were remiss was in making that a general belief that defines all atheists." That is not even a sentence. "it stands to reason that they should value each unit of time they are alive." No it doesn't -- that is your own personal faith-based and unsupported religious belief, and is neither observable science nor rational logic. Without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between what should be done and what should not be done. Also, without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between that which stands to reason and that which does not stand to reason. " An atheist who possesses that thought patten realises" No he doesn't, because there is no such thing as an atheist. " the immense value of life" Without God, there could be no objective value to life. " because they spent infinity without existing" That phrase makes no sense whatsoever: Nobody can possibly spend any time not existing, because the very act of spending time necessitates that the person in question must exist. " and will spend infinity deceased." That phrase also makes no sense whatsoever: Nobody can possibly spend any time deceased, because the very act of spending time necessitates that the person in question must be alive. "This alone makes life very much worth living for them" That is your own personal faith-based religious belief, not observable science. Also, without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between worth and lack thereof. "an incredibly wide perspective." Without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between a wide perspective and a narrow perspective. "Death can be met with stoic acceptance and life will still retain its joys and comforts through this way." That is your own personal faith-based religious belief, not observable science. "A point I will leave you with is that atheists do not completely despair" atheists can neither despair nor refrain from despair because there is no such thing as an atheist. " like the religious' Believers in atheist Dogma ARE religious. ", they possess hope." Without God, there could be no hope for anything at all. "everything is about chance" So-called "chance" is nothing but an unscientific myth that does not exist in reality -- it is your own personal faith-based religious belief, not observable science. ". The atheist understands" The atheist understands exactly nothing, because there is no such thing as an atheist. " that very few things are certain" Without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between the certain and the uncertain. " and has hope that the randomness" So-called "randomness" is nothing but an unscientific myth that does not exist in reality -- it is your own personal faith-based religious belief, not observable science. "spontaneity of life " Without God, life could have no spontaneity. "may play to their favour." Without God, nobody could make an objective distinction between favor and disfavor. "determined by chance" So-called "chance" is nothing but an unscientific myth that does not exist in reality -- it is your own personal faith-based religious belief, not observable science. "rob the atheist" Nobody could rob a nonexistent entity of anything, and there is no such thing as an atheist. You lost this debate, and actually, you really should commit suicide as soon as possible: Thanks for your time! =)