Holocaust revisionism should be legal

Looking through your argument and past debates I can see there is an emerging trend of hate and fear. To be honest arguing this debate is a bit hard for me as it seems hard to think you can ever deny something that created such a tear in the history of man kind. Personally I find it hard to believe that anyone would deny the event as apparently the photo's, bones and buildings is just not good enough evidence so it begs the question what else would be needed to prove the event. Let me ask you this why would these people want to look into this event? What could they get out of it?. Okay let's say in a hypothetical world the holocaust never happened and your alleged truth seekers were the "heroes" in this case what good would this bring upon the world I mean would we be better off if the holocaust was a lie? (At least those lives would of never been taken away). This research isn't driven by intellectual knowledge but by hatred of the Jewish race who in the end are just human beings no less than you or me people who feel and others who experience pain and emotion. The holocaust was so much more than an event it's a part of history that is one of the moments where we went down a road so dark that to this day it still has such a powerfully painful place in the history of Europe and the rest of the world. So why would these people want to go out of their way to prove nothing happened what good can come into their lives trying to disprove an event that happened just 75 years ago that still shows affect to this day. Just reading through a topic (2nd Link) on the subject matter I found that the report had little to no evidence to back it up claims are made that scientists had checked these camps for traces of cyanide in the gas chambers but of course even if they did test the chambers it would be inconclusive as no cyanide was used at all they used carbon monoxide gas. Another claim is that not enough bodies were found yet they forget to mention that alot of these camps had contained crematoriums so it answers the question of where those bodies went. It seems that these hard hitting investigators don't do enough research but just pulling facts out of the air that would make sense in a poorly done report. It seems you are basing your argument strongly on accusations yet you are unable to back this evidence up as you had only supplied one link and even that link doesn't do well in supporting your argument. To compare a politicians accusations towards some man just reading into his own belief is not a fair comparison as he is a politician the lives of many people are counting on him to be of an open and sympathetic stance but when claims are made that he believes a genocide (not the holocaust) never happened it does create concern for many people as he has power over an actual country and of course if he has any existing beliefs against a large group of people this may conflict with his job towards working for his country. Your accusations of the mistreatment of holocaust deniers need to be backed up better than a link that does not equate to that of someone with pre existing beliefs that hold no power over any other people. "But the problem with these so-called "revisionists" is that they are not engaging in a scholarly practice at all-though couched in academic terms, their claims distort well-established facts and tarnish the memory of the dead"Genocide Prevention Now Law Banning Holocaust Denial The laws that were put into place by other countries do more good than you claim otherwise alot of them fall under the hate speech regulations (which are an all round fair regulation). The ones that are directed towards holocaust denial mainly are just fines but can cause an increase in a prison sentence if it is accompanied by a crime. These laws allow to make sure that violence is kept on a low level as there are still many Neo Nazi groups who hold alot of hate towards others and spreading hate can increase misinformed people that may actually harm innocent civilians so this talk of hate has to be kept regulated. Another thing to remember is that your needs are no greater than anyone else's that includes your need to the freedom of speech against another person's freedom of feeling safe and being treated with dignity and most of all respect.Links http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org... http://www.biblebelievers.org.au...http://www.genocidepreventionnow.org...;http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org...;