Snelld7's Argument for the Immorality of Homosexuality is Incorrect.

>> "through homosexuality you cannot achieve reproduction."~Snelld7 This premise is flawed. Through in vitro fertilization, surrogate mothers, etc.. homosexual couples can have children of their same gender that is comprised of their own biological material.~JustCallMeTarzan --No, it's not. That's not achieving reproduction by homosexuality. It's achieving it through vitro fertilization. If it can't happen without intervention, it isn't natural >>>"Anal sex is not unnatural. Many creatures in the animal kingdom practice homosexual behavior, which necessarily incorporates anal sex if between males.Furthermore, anal sex has been historically used as a form of birth control "~Tarzan --So if sex in the ear is done by wild animals, and a few humans [...] Does that make it natural? Birth control, also, isn't natural. >>>Considering all lust is carnal, this isn't a very salient point. Carnal is an adjective that refers to behavior that pertains to bodily (usually sexual) appetites and desires (http://dictionary.reference.com......), and lust is a noun that refers to sexual desires (http://dictionary.reference.com......). So it makes little sense to say "carnal lust" as though that's worse than just "lust." Furthermore, you are incorrect that lust is categorically morally shunned - the moral approbations on lust are based on Matthew 5:28, which reads: "But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Thus, it is clear that approbation of lust is really approbation of adultery. Abandon a religious framework, and the approbation of lust disappears. ---Lust isn't bad? Is that your "proposition on offer" in this point? Well, then would you find it ok for your uncle to lust after your gf (or bf if that's what you have). Lust is not good for obvious reasons. Are you basically asking me to explain if cars have wheels, and why? >>>"In order for this argument to succeed, Snelld7 must show: 1) Homosexuals are incapable of reproduction. 2) Homosexuals enter into relationships based ONLY on lust. 3) Anal sex is unnatural. 4) Oral sex is unnatural. 5) Anal and Oral sex are always acts of carnal lust (i.e. cannot be done from love). 6) Lust is categorically morally repugnant."~Tarzan --No, I just need to show that homosexuality is immoral through any of these 6. That was my point in posting it. Not to show that it must be BY ALL OF THESE criterion, be immoral. I was merely pointing out more than one reason. So, in order for me to be right, all I need is for one to stand. It will still be true even if you disprove all but number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. This said, all I need is for one to stand (although more than that will stand), and I win this debate. Thank you for the challenge, I look forward to your arguments. Can you list the argument in numbers according to the 6 you posted? EX: 1)Homosexuals are incapable of reproduction. My opponent etc............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2) Homosexuals enter... etc. Please and thank you