Biblical truth is false.

Pro has presented a shallow argument. "The point here is exactly what pro stated. Biblical information is not truth, yet it is not false." I never stated that Biblical information is not truth. "Biblical truth cannot be truth unless it is proven to be true." This is a re-wording of Pro's previous argument and is still a fallacy. Something CAN be true without being proven to be true. Answer this: is science truth? Science books are the unbeliever's bibles which the atheists cling to with their very lives, but can science be proven scientifically? Again, when taking the Bible to be truth, one is making assumptions: the people writing this book are inspired by God, but this is nothing new. Like I said, there are countless assumptions and people, no matter what they believe, are forced to have faith that these assumptions are true. "So, the term 'Biblical Truth' is making a claim through the very definition of it's words." When Christians claim that the Bible is truth, it is because they have (1) read the bible, (2) God has revealed himself to them, and then (3) they have considered the alternatives. If you read the Bible, the you must come to one of three conclusions, either the people writing it were all mad, they were lying, or they were telling the truth. I suppose they could be mad, but the writing seems too exquisitely sane. They may have been lying, but why would they make up commandments and ideas that did nothing to benefit them? The ideas presented in the Bible are so against human nature. Loving enemies makes absolutely no sense from a human perspective. In the Koran for example, you see ideas that are much more human such as getting 50 virgins when you get to heaven. That in itself tells you a lot about the writer. So probably the best option of the three would be to conclude that those writing the Bible were telling the truth. God will also reveal himself to humans, and I don't mean Jesus and a few of his angel friends show up in your house one sunday afternoon. Then we can also consider alternative ideas such as no god or many gods or maybe we are god. Taking a look at nature, the universe and its complexity, and human nature we may come to the conclusion that the Bible is correct because what is in the book makes the more sense than anything else. In the end, Christians can themselves be certain of Biblical truth without every proving it to be truth scientifically. It is being "certain of what we do not see." [1] What I have just presented is why Christians say the Bible is truth. So although I cannot prove it scientifically, I now believe without a doubt that the Bible is truth. This is why Christians will tell others that the Bible is truth, but it's really up to them to figure out for themselves, and in the end one view or the other will be proven true. I have shown Pro's argument fallacious and shown why Christians claim the Bible as truth. It is up to Pro to prove the Bible is a false book, and Pro cannot do so by claiming that it cannot be scientifically proven as many things cannot be scientifically proven. So far, Pro has given no evidence that what the Bible claims is false. Should we save Round 5 for conclusions? It's up to you. [1] Hebrews 11:1