AIDS and HIV are the result of homoseual sex or beastiality.

First let me ask my opponent what exactly his posistion is because his accepting statement is quite confusing. He sates, "I definitely support the bestiality (not beastiality) argument." He first stated he supported the beastialiy argument but in parenthesis says no beastiality.I believe I and the readers are not clear on pros posistion. So i ask pro to please claify his posistion.My posistion is simple. My case revolves around the fact that there are other highly likely, probable theories witch seek to explain the origin of AIDS and HIV. The fact that these theories exist and are more than or equaly probable to the probability of beastiality being the origin of AIDS simply means that we cannont logically conclude that HIV and AIDS engaged in zoonosis to the human popultion via beastiality because we cannot refute all other possibilities. Therefore the posistion of pro must fail under these conditions.( when i speak of either HIV or AIDS i am speaking on both deseaises as one.)Zoonosis most likely happened from one or more of the following theories.The Hunter Cutter Theory.SIV is definately where the HIV virus came from which is found in red-capped Mangabey chimpanzies and the great spot nosed monkeys native to Africa. SIV could have crossed to the human species and mutated do to hunters killing,skining, and consuming the contaminated monkeys. The hunters could have also been contaminated via skin leasions. Generally if this would happen the bodies immune system would resist. However since this is a lentivirus it acts slow and could have easily mutated to HIV 1. There are many different HIV strains and different virus makeups. Everytime the virus crossed over from monkey to human it adapted differently to different humans.http://hivinfosite.com...The Hepatitus B Vaccination Experiments.The vaccine was made in chimps during pilot testing in New York city amoung gay men and Africans between 1972-1974. The same source states, "This was precisely timed for the emergence of AIDS in these exact, demographically distinct, communities by the late 1970s. The fact that this fact was neglected proves shoddy science or gross negligence at best."http://www.originofaids.com...Another more credible source disagrees with the hunter theory based on the previously stated examinations. Dr. Leonard Horowitz of Harvard unearthed research documents proving his theory. He states, "chimpanzees, contaminated with numerous viruses, were used to produce hundreds of hepatitis B vaccine doses administered to central African Blacks along with homosexual men in New York City at precisely the time Dr. Myers and colleagues claim the origin of HIV "punctuated event" occurred."http://www.originofaids.com...If one was to read in their entirety both of my sources one would find it probable that AIDS and HIV more than likely came from either the hunter theory or the hepatitus B vaccine experiment is when the SIV jumped to humans and became HIV. Both of these theories cannot be absolutely denied. Since they cannot we cannot conclude the beastiality is the absolute and only origin of the human aquisistion of AIDS and HIV. Therefore the defense rests.