The Earth Is Not Overpopulated

I thank Subutai for her arguments, and in this round, I will open my arguments in this round. Observations O1: The Resolution, and the definitions The resolution is “The Earth is not overpopulated”. The definition of Earth is well, the normal definition of Earth, as the third planet from the sun, and the radius of the Earth. Overpopulated means, “Excessive population of an area to the point of overcrowding, depletion of natural resources, or environmental deterioration” The resolution is that the earth is not overpopulated, or the earth does not have a excessive population in a place, which is overcrowding. O2: Burdens Therefore, my burden is that if I show a place which has excessive population in a place, then I win. If I can’t, then my opponent wins. I will make no framework in the debate, because it is quite pointless as that is not part of my burden. It is not about the whole world being overpopulated, which it is. O3. Confusion I predict that my opponent and I will be confused in what is actually overpopulated. Overpopulated is that there is too many people in Earth, many people in one area, etc. O4: Introduction My case will be quite short, because there isn’t much to put in this kind of debate, only lame pictures. My opponent asked to not make any rebuttals in this round, so I won’t be making rebuttals. Arguments 1/ Some pictures As I showed my burden, and show if there is an excessive population in one place, then I win. So I will show some pictures. s://lh3.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="404" height="228" /> And a normal day in front of my house in the Eiffel Tower… s://lh4.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="318" height="159" /> And the Opera House in Australia… s://lh4.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="256" height="171" /> I’ve shown places which is overcrowded with people, and my burden was too show an area which has an excessive amount of people, and as I did, please VOTE CON. As it is overpopulated, which I am saying that some areas are overpopulated, and I showed, vote Con. 2/ Some country examples Subpoint 1: An example of China There is currently over 7 billion, and 430 million people in the world today (when I am writing my argument) [1]. And there are over 1 billion and 400 million people in China alone [1]. This is over 1/7 of the Earth’s population. China is right now 4th in world space population, 9,596,960 km squared [2]. As my opponent’s definitions, the earth is 149,600,000 kilometers squared. This means China is less than 1/16 of the world’s space. As it is over 1/7 of the world’s population, when it is less than 1/17 of the world’s space, this means that China is overpopulated, and as I’ve met my BoP to find a place with excessive population, you should ought to vote for Con. And of course, Pro might say this isn’t overpopulated. But it is. In the world’s 10 most populated cities, China is the world’s 10th, 9th, 8th, and 1st [3]. This is a massive amount. 3/10 is China out of over 200 countries, making China overpopulated. Therefore, I have met my BoP, and please vote Con. Subpoint 2: India There is currently over 7 billion and 430 million people in the word as I said. There is over 1 billion and 298 million people in India, more then 1/7 of the world’s population. India is 3,287,590 square kilometers, and less that over 1/30 of the land. Therefore, it is overpopulated in india. It is also 4th in the most populated cities, showing it is overpopulated. Summary: Many places are overpopulated, and there are more babies each day, and people born then deaths [1] as today, so please vote Con!!!! 3/ The changes of human population I will show some pictures of the growth change of what happened of the population. This graph is quite good, as I saw. s://lh5.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="624" height="328" /> These changes are drastic. There were around 1 billion people 200 years ago, and in 200 years, it doubled by 7 billion. This is drastic. Look at the graph. From the start, there weren’t much humans in the early days, but look at the drastic changes [4]. Scientists say that the most people Earth can fill is around 10 billion calculating the water, and the food, etc. [5] Unfortunately, scientists believe that in around 2100, it will be 10 billion people. Therefore, the Earth is too overpopulated, and this needs to change until the earth is full, and all dies. The future s://lh5.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="624" height="436" /> So, in the end, we are too overpopulated. 4/ The changes to Earth because of overpopulation Subpoint 1: Pollution Definition of Pollution: the action or process of making land, water, air, etc., dirty and not safe or suitable to use [6] Why is there pollution? “ It comes from both natural and man-made sources. Motor vehicle emissions are one of the leading causes, but other principal pollution sources include chemical plants, coal-fired power plants, oil refineries, petrochemical plants, nuclear waste disposal activity, incinerators, large livestock farms, PVC factories, metal production factories, plastic factories and other heavy industry. Read more at http://www.earthtimes.org... [7].” It says it comes from man-made things, like vehicles, factories, etc. But why are there these things? Because of humans!!! More people, more pollution. And there is lot’s of pollution right now, see this picture in the deaths of pollution s://lh5.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="485" height="330" /> If there is a lot of deaths from pollution, then logically there is lots of pollution in the world. If more pollution means more people, that means that because there is lots of pollution, it means that the earth is overpopulated. P1: There is a lot of deaths in pollution C1: Therefore, there is a lot of pollution P2: More pollution means more people, as I showed P3: And, as I said in C1, there is a lot of pollution C2: Therefore, the Earth is overpopulated Therefore, I have shown pollution as an evidence of the some areas, such as China in this map, as it has most pollution, is overpopulated. Subpoint 2: Global Warming Definition of Global Warming: an increase in the earth's atmospheric and oceanic temperatures widely predicted to occur due to an increase in the greenhouse effect resulting especially from pollution [8]. I will explain this point more, even though this is basically the same as pollution, the more evidence, the better. Causes: “It took more than 20 years to broadly accept that mankind is causing global warming with the emission of greenhouse gases [9].” Many other sources to prove this too [10]. Humans are the cause of Global Warming. And, in the last 20 years, as it said, there was lots of global warming, and in this graph also. s://lh4.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="500" height="390" /> This seems suspicious that humans did it, because in the last 20 years, human population had began to increase a lot, and it is the same as global warming. Therefore, there is another premise. P1: Global Warming went up in a lot in 20 years P2: Also human population began to come up C1: Therefore, global warming must be because of humans, and more the human population goes up, the more global warming there is. P3: There is more global warming C2: If same, the human population is overpopulated. If this is right, then that means that because there is lot’s of global warming as showed in the graph above, so logically, that means human population is increasing, and it is overpopulated, as there is lot’s of pollution Conclusion Just a funny picture s://lh3.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="378" height="416" /> Now, I’ve spammed too much. I could have just ended with my first argument, from the pictures, because it shows overpopulation from one area, but I showed all the other graphs more. I think I have shown that humans are overpopulated, gave examples such as China, so on, and so forth. My burden is full because I showed that some places are overpopulated, therefore, Please vote Con!!! Over to Pro!!! Sources [1] http://www.worldometers.info... For the first source, it also shows the population growth. [2] http://www.geohive.com... [3] http://www.borgenmagazine.com... [4] http://www.evidenceunseen.com... [5] http://www.livescience.com... [6] http://www.merriam-webster.com... [7] http://www.earthtimes.org... [8] http://www.merriam-webster.com... [9] http://timeforchange.org... [10] https://www.nwf.org... Other sources of the pictures [1] http://tinyurl.com... For the picture of Global Temperatures [2] https://gorancson.wordpress.com... For the deaths of pollution picture [3] http://www.sustainablescale.org... For the world population development [4] The same source for my first [1]. Scroll to the bottom, and you can find it. [5] http://www.parisinsidersguide.com... Picture of the eiffel tower [6] http://www.smh.com.au... For the Opera House [7] http://www.commdiginews.com... The first picture, the overpopulated place.