There is not enough evidence to prove that I am not the easter Bunny.

I would like to say that even though this debate seems foolish or troll like, I am attempting to actually have a logical discussion. Even though this idea seems absurd, when I thought about it, I could not find a way to refute it. I also thank my opponent for taking this debate seriously. DEFINITIONS: ========================= Easter Bunny: Wikipedia: "The Easter Bunny (or Easter Hare) is a character depicted as an anthropomorphic rabbit. In legend, the creature brings baskets filled with colored eggs, candy and toys to the homes of children on the night before Easter" Dictionary: A rabbit of folklore depicted as delivering baskets of colored eggs to children at Easter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Folklore: Wikipedia: Folklore culture, including stories, music, dance, legends, oral history, proverbs, jokes, popular beliefs, customs, and so forth within a particular population comprising the traditions (including oral traditions) of that culture, subculture, or group. It is also the set of practices through which those expressive genres are shared. The academic and usually ethnographic study of folklore is sometimes called folkloristics. The word 'folklore' was first used by the English antiquarian William Thoms in a letter published by the London Journal Athenaeum in 1846. In usage, there is a continuum between folklore and mythology. Stith Thompson made a major attempt to index the motifs of both folklore and mythology, providing an outline into which new motifs can be placed, and scholars can keep track of all older motifs. Dictionary: The traditional beliefs, legends, customs, etc. , of a people; lore of a people. I accept your definition of Easter Bunny, but let us try to use as little from Wikipedia as we can, seeing that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, therefore can be unreliable. I am not saying that you can not use it, I am simple asking to keep it to a minimum. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Possibilities: The condition or fact of being possible ARGUMENT: ================================ There is no sure to show exactly how long humans have been roaming the earth. Some say billions, some millions, and some thousands. Whatever one is true, there is no doubt humans have been here awhile. But yet, there is still so much that has not been proven. Yes we can hypothesize, Water on Pluto, Aliens, the hidden treasures of the Aztecs… But we still can not prove that it/they exist or do not exist. Have you ever seen a purple diamonds that is 5 feet long? Of course not, but just because you have never seen one does not mean that one does not exist. It could be underground, maybe a secret tribe in Africa has it. In most likelihood, the diamond does not exist. But that does not prove that it doesn't. We could say the same thing about the Easter Bunny. There are so many possibilities that I am the Easter Bunny. I shall list just a few below. 1. I could be a Bunny that knows how to think like a human and type on the computer. 2. I could deliver eggs to children the night before Easter. 3. I could be in hiding so the government won't capture me and take me to the zoo. 4. I could be invisible. 5. I could alter people's thoughts so they don't remember me. 6. I could be an alien from another planet where the laws of physics, order and age do not apply. 7. I could have a special metal suit that keeps me from aging. 8. I could eat a certain plant that makes me able to think like a human and type. 9. I could have a pouch that could fit many eggs in it, yet does not feel heavy. 10. I could take the shape of a dog, cat, or even a human so people would not suspect the Easter Bunny existing. In order to prove that I am not the Easter Bunny you would have to prove the things I listed above and more not to be true. While you may be able to show that the things I have listed are nearly impossible, you can not prove 100% that they are not possible. In this world there is always a variable, an unknown factor. Even gravity could be defined as a theory. Read this short paragraph describing gravity. Modern physics describes gravitation using the general THEORY of relativity, in which gravitation is a consequence of the curvature of space-time which governs the motion of inertial objects. The simpler Newton's law of universal gravitation provides an accurate approximation for most calculations. Also, read this article. The existence of tides is often taken as a proof of gravity, but this is logically flawed. Because if the moon's "gravity" were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are 2 -- not 1 -- high tides every day. It is far more likely that tides were given us by an Intelligent Creator long ago and they have been with us ever since. In any case, two high tides falsifies gravity. In all likelihood gravity exists, but it could be that every planet has a suction monster that simply pulls things down. Gravity i more of a religious belief. People teach these things as fact, even though they are not 100% sure that it is true. That is why creativity is so limited these days. Teachers, Political leaders, scientists, parents, they all try to get rid of possibilities. But just because you say something long and hard enough does not make it true or not true. Today I saw a boy playing with a spinning top at my church. He said to his mother, ‘It is a parachute! ' The mother looked at him and said, ‘No, it is just a spinning top. ' This simply crushed the boy's imagination. Although the spinning top was not a parachute, it is still a good example of how people like to end possibilities. I could sit here and explain how the spinning top could be a parachute, but I am running out of Characters. Ask yourself this, why did you accept this debate in the first place? It was probably because you thought without doubt that there is no Easter Bunny. Is that what you originally believed? Or is that what your parents and school teachers told you when you grew up? In conclusion, we can not prove that I am not the Easter Bunny. Remember, the resolution is "there is not enough evidence to prove that I am not the Easter Bunny. " It is not, "I am the Easter Bunny. " Therefore I do not have to prove that I am. I am not saying that the things above are true, I am simply saying that they could be. Even if there is a 0.0000001% chance that I am the Easter Bunny I would win this debate and there is. I await my opponent's response. Sources: (1). . http://archive.ncsa.illinois.edu... (2). . http://www.merriam-webster.com... (3). . http://en.wikipedia.org... (4). . http://en.wikipedia.org... (5). . http://www.bringyou.to... (6). . http://en.wikipedia.org... (7). . http://dictionary.reference.com...