BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Rap Battle 20: [your fav rapper] (Pro) vs Eazy E (Con)

You think I'm dead? Ma spirit's un-killableUnlike your @ss, I kill with every syllableMy thirst fo' pvssy is just un-fillableit explains the STDs on ma willy holeBut, niggaPeople choose not to go at cho' nubCause your face acts like a natural glove!Yes it sucks I contracted fvckin' AIDsBut at least I can say I got pvssy fo dayz!So you betta than me nigga? Is dat true?Just remember you used to open for my rap group!Givin' me shjt cause Suge knocked my grooveBut don't forget he dangled you off the roof! [1]muthafvckaYo' new shjt's unpopula, no one like's you, nigga 30 years later, they still listen to my tune, niggaIt's too bad you failed: the suicide attemptNext time do itCause everyone holds you in high contemptWe rappin', you losin', you think Ima DIE again?Well your round 1 was weak... TRY againNow, bjtch, you betta quit stealin' ma rhymes Yo lines suck without them, but quit with your crimes[italics is part of the beat]1.http://www.laweekly.com...
Rap Battle 20: [your fav rapper] (Pro) vs Eazy E (Con)

Well hello Mr. Eaze You motherfvkin sleaze How's your STD's? **special Vanilla ice dance** Can't believe I'm rappin with a dead nigga What he died from you can go figga I didn't get the AIDS, cus' I like to take precautions I use more condoms than ya daughter has abortions So whatttt if I'm white, at least I ain't no kike' I know you like the Jews, cus your manager you screwed He fvcked you up the a$$ Had you doin' the dick dance Tryin' to diss me you niggaa, at least I'm still alive, you been gone since 95' I still damn got it, never fvcking lost it Just look how white my teeth are, while I'm riding in my sports car I got the looks of a celebrity, I shop for things expensively, and now I'm ruinin' you aggressively You got beat by Suge Knight and his cronies You can't even stand upta amateur homies You shoulda killed that fvcker while ya had the chance, but instead you pranced around like a retard in a trance Now he's jokin' bout you on TV Indicatin' he injected you with HIV What a fvcking pu$$y you are, shoulda dealt with the problem, but you chose to let your enemies motherfvckin blossom You think Compton's great, well bitchh I'm in Florida, and if you wasn't dead already I'd take ya to the coroner **drops mic**
Rap Battle 20: [your fav rapper] (Pro) vs Eazy E (Con)

ma beat[Boy, you shoulda known by now... Eazy Duz It]Ay yo, just anotha battle, here with ma niggaHoly shjt you're WHITE?! What's with ya figya?Rap aint Vanilla, so why you think you got it?Go sing some pop, Cause this music's chocolate!I'm the muthafvckin Eaz, so please njgga pleaseQuit with that breakdance shjt, and get to yo knees![nigga]No sweat battling a one-hit-wonderUnlike your career, mine aint' a blunder!Nobody wants to fvck with Bob Van WinkleBut I've fvcked so much that I feel a burn in my pee hole!So please hoe-Step back from the father of gangsta rap,And quit pretendin', cause a real gangsta's black!This prankster's wickety- wackone more word and this wangster's gittin' a slapAnd for a more thorough lesson,I'll go head- pull out ma Smith & WessonWe real in Compton, you fake in DallasCome to ma palace and I'll give you malice, njgga"Ice Ice Baby" is just a buncha plundered treasureCause you stole the beat from "Under Pressure"Well, it's been a pleasureBeatin you down every fvckin measure[boy you shoulda known by now] So go ahead, sign your cheesy love shjt [boy you shoulda known by now] Cause boy you shoulda known by now, Eazy Duz It
Rap Battle 20: [your fav rapper] (Pro) vs Eazy E (Con)

In Rap Battle 20, my competition and I will be assuming the roles of one of our favorite rap artists, your rapper and Eazy E (me). Whoever disses the other rap representation the hardest wins. R1: acceptance and choosing your rapper, or you can go first if you feel up to it (then you must concede R4) R2, 3, and 4: Lay down bars to decimate your opponent Rules: 1. Total plagiarism of a rap is denied, but sense we are taking on the roles of other rappers, one or two lines is permitted per round. But keep it low. 2. You can either Freestyle or use Edited lines, whatever you feel will help you win. 3. Note to voters: RFV not needed, but it's encouraged. 4. Rap Hard You accept this battle against NWA? Nigga, don't pretend to be somethin' you aint...
The American Revolution was far more important to American society and history than The Civil War.

Thank you for your compliments. It's nice to see there are still cordial debaters left in the world. First let me pull across some of my argumentation. As I see it the argumentation left standing on both sides is what in fact each war represents. I think we both have essentially conceeded to the fact that both wars were fought to preserve what we call today "American fundamentalism" and that both wars pitted brother against brother. In all honesty this first point has become mostly a wash argument. Trying to say which war better demonstrated the American will to preserve freedom andequality wold be like trying to argue whether apple pie is superior to cherry pie. However, the second point holds great promise for the both of us, and its here where I hope to achieve the other hand. In several American conflicts, war agaisnt one's brother has become almost a theme. For example, the First and Second World Wars n the European theatre returned emmigrants back to their home nations fighting under the stars and stripes. How many Germans, Italians, Eastern Europeans, and others were pitted agaisnt family in those many year of fighting. They, much like the American Revalution, did fight family undisputedly. However, in these three wars those bloodlines start to become scarcer or more farremoved. How many American's actually fought other American's in the South, I'm not a Revalutionary History expert so anyinformation you provide here can easily turn the tide of this debate? The majority of the Revalution, espeially the major battles in the New England colonies, mostly pitted British soldiers agaisnt American Minute Men. On the other hand, the Civil War began due to the secesscion of twelve states from the Union. Beofre war was declared Abraham Lincoln sent a correspondence to Robert E. Lee asking im to serve as a general for the Union. Although Lee was in favor of the Union and agaisnt slavery, he chose to fight for Virgina, his home state. This is the signifigance of the Civil War. It was fought not by a people of just a similar heritage, but a nation of brothers. Brothers who fought for the same cause under two different flags. Why do we still see so strongly pride of the Stars and Bars in th South and not the Union Jack which would have been flown by the loyalists during the Revalutionary War. It is because of what the Stars and Bars stands for: Freedom, Independence, and Liberty. That connotation may vary depending on who you are, but to those still loyal to confederae brotherhood, its just as powerful a symbol as Old Glory.
The American Revolution was far more important to American society and history than The Civil War.

I would like to begin my opening argument by first saying that I in no way find The Civil War to be an unimportant part of American history. I just do not like the fact that in many history classes today, as well as in American society in general, The Civil War is given greater emphasis. I mean, honestly, let's face it people without The American Revolution all of the rest of American history would have been different. The opening chapters of novels set the stage for the rest of the book. Imagine if the opening chapter of this country had turned out differently? Bottom line: The American Revolution instilled in this nation the most cherished ideals, philosophies, traditions, and folklore that we as a people have. The Civil War was fought, in part, to preserve these ideals. But, preserve does not mean create. The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, even the idea of a presidency and checks and balances came from this great time in history. Even honest Abe can't compete with that. So I say…Bring it on Civil War!
Euthanasia should become Legalized in the US

Hi Tim! I would like to give you reasons as to why Euthanasia can be justified. I would like to remind everyone that Euthanasia isn't a solution for every terminally ill patient, but it is very helpful for those who choose to do so. Here is a story of an author's friend who is terminally-ill: "Marge, I had no idea it would be so hard," Jean told me on the phone. "I've been saving pills for this, but now I'm afraid they won't work. You know, when you live to 93, you have a strong heart, and it isn't easy for it to stop." Jean, a widow for 20 years, was a remarkable woman; strong, bright, clear-headed. She had been well able to take care of herself until a few months before. The uterine cancer that she had beaten at 86 had returned. Her long-time Aspen doctor, in whom she had great confidence, discussed the options with her. Chemotherapy was likely to give her time, but no cure. (Fridstein) It shows how hopeless people feel in times when faced with inevitable death. Your reference of Genesis doesn't connect to Euthanasia. I would like to see you clarify this in your next argument. You go on to say that Euthanasia sounds like a hipster band, and is for idiots. I urge my opponent to take this debate seriously because it is a very important debate in our society. Having a legitimate debate helps foster education on this topic. Not only is it disrespectful, but wastes time to those who want to have a educational debate. God- I don't want to get into a debate about god, because many don't believe in god or believe in a different version of god. Thus it is unfair to them. But if you wanted evidence from Christianity I will do that. God also wants people to live a peaceful life. Shown in 2 Corinthians 13:11 "Finally, brethren, farewell. Become complete. Be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace; and the God of love and peace will be with you." Unnecessary pain doesn't have a place in a comfortable life. Therefore, it is justifiable for Christians to accept mercy killing. Thus, Euthanasia abides by Christianity's morals. Thank you for accepting this debate, and I urge you to take this topic seriously. Fridstein, Margery. "It Is Merciful to Help a Terminally Ill Person Die." Assisted Suicide. Ed. No"l Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "Lessons in Dying: What Is Wrong with Giving Up When Our Bodies Give Out?" Denver Post 28 Nov. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Nov. 2014.
Euthanasia should become Legalized in the US

Hey there DeAngelo. My name is Tim, and I live in the wonderful state of West Virginia. I personally believe that Euthanasia should be banned, as it cannot be justified. God does not believe in Euthanasia. In chapter 17 of Genesis, this is made clear. "That very day Abraham and his son Ish'mael were circumcised." You have to look at this as the metaphor it is. This is clearly representative of Euthanasia. This quote is clearly not one to take literally, and it needs to be interpreted so that you can see that Euthanasia is frowned upon by God. Furthermore, Euthanasia sounds like a hipster band, and alternative music is stupid. Therefore, Euthanasia is by extension stupid, and for idiots. Finally, God hates killing people, and Euthanasia is killing people. You are a terrible person for endorsing murder. If you kill people, you are no friend of God. For the reasons above, Euthanasia is stupid. I don't think you can argue against the bible, and if you try, it is clear that you haven't read the Bible tl;dr- READ THE BIBLE. It will change your life. God has plans for you, and you should praise him and join the beautiful evangelical community
Euthanasia should become Legalized in the US

Marcus, I think that God wants you as a friend. Visit http://www.theevangelicalchurch.org... to learn more about the wonderful world of the evangelical church. We value people becoming followers of Jesus Christ. We believe God commands us to engage the harvest by bringing all people into a vital saving relationship with Jesus; therefore, we exhort each church to effectively impact their community through servant evangelism and to multiply through planting new churches in new communities. We believe God commands us to provide a healthy church family for new believers as well as for the unchurched; therefore, we promote the revitalizing and renewal of existing churches through prayer, assessment tools and trained coaches who can walk with them into health. We believe God commands us to disciple believers to experience the cleansing and empowering of the Holy Spirit in order to live holy lives out of a pure heart; therefore, a goal of discipleship, preaching, and teaching is to lead believers into this deeper life. We believe God commands us to make disciples of all people; therefore, we actively recruit, appoint and place people overseas as well as working with ethnic groups in the United States. We partner with national churches as well as other mission groups to accomplish this mission. We value God's revelation to us through Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, the Bible, prayer and the church. We believe in a vital holy relationship with Jesus Christ; therefore, we boldly proclaim the necessity of being cleansed from sin through the in-filling of the Holy Spirit so that we may be Christ-like. We believe the Bible is God's inerrant revelation; therefore, we encourage all believers to engage in its systematic reading and study. We believe in prayer; therefore, we promote the Intercessor teams, being alert to prayer opportunities in every gathering and prayer emphasis in the denominational publications. We believe in the local church being a place of grace and growth where there is flexibility in worship and organization, with an adherence to the tenets of Faith. We value the resources God gives us in leadership and money. We believe that God entrusts us with leaders; therefore, we are developing a system of assessing, coaching and continuing education to enable them to be more effective ministers of the gospel. We believe that God entrusts money to us for expanding His Kingdom; therefore, outreach will be a priority in spending. God wants you. Choose the right path
Euthanasia should become Legalized in the US

I would like to remind for the 3rd time. The resolution is Euthanasia should become Legalized in the US. It doesn't have to do with believing in god. There can be arguments on god with Euthanasia, but that is not what the opponent is doing. Again, Euthanasia is merciful for patients who choose to seek that route. Due to the nonexistent clash in this debate. I would like to remind my opponent not to make any new arguments because I do not have a 6th round to finally talk about Euthanasia. However, because we have been talking about I do want to end with one quote from a doctor: "If I do not help him, do I not play God, taking away from him the option of a gentle and, in his eyes, a rational death" Life is about rationality. The separation between truth, and falsehood, is required to live a meaningful life. There should not be a grey area. So if a patient deliberately asks to end their painful terminal life, it should be our duty as a society to give them the dignity. Thus I offer a set line that will separate the rational and irrational in medical decision. That is to legalize Euthanasia for quality of life to terminally ill patients.
God Created Existence In Six Days

Let it be known that Con does not understand that I do not intend to disprove science's understanding of the Big Bang, nor do I intend to disprove of evolution as proposed by Charles Darwin and is understood by modern scientists today. It is my intention to prove that the Genesis account of Creation is a simplified, albeit metaphoric, generational narrative of universal origins, and is not predisposed to stand as a source subjected to mankind's accepted scientific method of analytical inquiry. Simply put, mathematicians will just have to become English teachers for a while. This is the paradox that exists between mankind's understanding of the physical and spiritual condition of things. "For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would." - (Galatians 5:17)I am willing to accept Con's terms and sources as they relate to The Big Bang universal model and evolution as defined by general science to be true within the scope they continue to remain wholly unchanged by their respective definitions.Again, for clarification; Day, by order of magnitude can be defined as being a particular period of the past or an era.And on the sixth day he formed Man from the ground, but not before creating beasts first. A distinct and unique species of H. sapiens., but not like those (animals) that existed prior to the advent of modern humanity 200,000 years ago. This is made apparent with unexplainably rapid leaps in evolution, virtually discounting a nominal link between modern H. Sapien and its accepted ancestors. This has happened twice according to simple sources (Google the age of humans) and is why we have different kinds of animals but only one kind of human being. Only one human-type would be able to survive on the planet at the same time.Can you imagine having to compete with another class of homo sapien equivalent to or greater than ours on the evolutionary timescale? That would have catastrophic consequences. :)Sources: Googled simple keywords, Wikipedia, a dictionary and reason.
God Created Existence In Six Days

I was on the University of California Riverside's library archives researching an astrophysics paper written in 1997 by Philip Gibbs concerning the matter of a black hole residing at the center of the universe. Data had surfaced indicating that the universal singularity (the moment of infinite mass that preceded the Big Bang) was not "bending spacetime" as it should have been given the apparent rapid expansion and then progressive deceleration of the universal model. According to Schwarzschild's radii equation, and as afforded by Newton's gravitational constant (G); spacetime is being observed at the alleged "beginning of time" as being in a "flat" state, not possessing the drastic bend the BBT (Big Bang Theory) calls for. This has given rise to speculation that what we perceive as being the universe is in all actuality an illusion.Genesis 1:1,2 begins with the statement, "In the beginning G-d created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters."Figurative interpretation of these events do not dismiss the potential for a Big Bang. On the contrary, for we know very little about the recent discovery of "dark energy" and "dark matter" that make up 95% of what is known to exist universally. Therefore biblically speaking, "the waters of the deep" is a direct reference to what existed before existence; darkness as it refers to complete absence (void). "The deep" is the very fabric of spacetime itself or what I like to refer to as being in a state of Alpha Chaos. Genesis 1:3, "And G-d said, Let there be light: and there was light."Light can be divided in the very same respect that darkness has its own division; which ironically is light. And in this moment of "new" light in which G-d commanded; the Big Bang occurred as an image of light. (The original Hebrew word for "image" means illusion or phantom) Genesis 1:4 further validates the prior statement by saying, "And G-d saw that the light was good; and G-d divided the light from the darkness."Genesis 1:5, "And G-d called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day."Have you ever wondered why Day and Night are levied as proper nouns? I thought that was an interesting observation as well. As it so turns out, given so many years of interpretation, that originally the word "Day" was referred to being "a period of time" or an era.The Six Days of Creation would then mean that G-d took six periods of time, separated by common words used as proper nouns, Day and Night, to Create everything we and cannot see today. In science there exists what is called Orders of Magnitude. It just so turns out that time is just as susceptible to its limitations as everything else.
god is a unicorn

Of course God isn't a Unicorn. Unicorns do not exist, at least in our world. It would be illogical to call a man a unicorn. Many passages in the bible use the prefix "he" not "The Unicorn." There are plenty of paintings Hong back hundreds of years showing God as a human. You have the burden of proving it. God is also a father that is talking, moving around and can think for himself. Unicorns can't do that. Matthew 5:45 He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good and sends rain on the just and the unjust. Note the use of the word "He," not "The Unicorn." http://www.hcs.harvard.edu...
Refusal of understanding, Proving the game is not fact.

So as I have stated before, My opponent has absolutely no verifiable proof to support his claims that the "roast game" is a fact. Instead of adding argument or debate to the points I made, my opponent claims victim to fallacy that does not exist. In very short and quick conclusion, My opponent here has shown serious lack of argument or debate against his claim that his "roast game" is fact. I have proven why it is not fact as I had set out to do. My opponent has not proven his game as fact. And that dear readers is a fact.
Refusal of understanding, Proving the game is not fact.

First, That is not all the sources I have to prove that The Roast Game is Fact.Here are all the sources:[1] http://bryan-mullins-the-roast-game.wikia.com...;[2] http://www.debate.org...[3] http://www.google.com...[4] https://m.youtube.com...[5] http://www.debate.org...[6] http://www.debate.org...[7] http://www.debate.org...Here is what you said. "A wiki page of his creation, he claims is fact, with no reports of any kind, no evidence to support the claim of any kind but his own youtube videos."This statement is so easy to debunk. You clearly took only one source, instead of all seven sources. How would there be no evidence if there were several sources I cited in the comment section of this debate: http://www.debate.org...Also, you are committing a fallacy called Appeasement."This fallacy, most often popularly connected to the shameful pre-World War II appeasement of Hitler, is in fact still commonly practiced in public agencies, education and retail business today, e.g. "Customers are always right, even when they're wrong. Don't argue with them, just give'em what they want so they'll shut up and go away, and not make a stink--it's cheaper and easier than a lawsuit." Widespread unchallenged acceptance of this fallacy encourages offensive, uncivil public behavior and sometimes the development of a coarse subculture of obnoxious, "assertive" manipulators who, like "spoiled" children, leverage their knowledge of how to figuratively (or sometimes even literally!) "make a stink" into a primary coping skill in order to get what they want when they want it. The works of the late Community Organizing guru Saul Alinsky suggest practical, nonviolent ways for groups to harness the power of this fallacy to promote social change, for good or for evil." [9] Source: http://utminers.utep.edu...
Refusal of understanding, Proving the game is not fact.

Because good ol' Bryan refuses point blank to debate, the Fact that his game, that he made up, is false and not fact. So here: His proof, http://bryan-mullins-the-roast-game.wikia.com... A wiki page of his creation, he claims is fact, with no reports of any kind, no evidence to support the claim of any kind but his own youtube videos, No evidence of any kind to support the claims. So Bryan, want to prove your game is fact here, or run away like a coward. Bearing in mind, refusal to debate, proves the roast game is false, fake and Bryan has nothing to back it up.