The bible is a moral book

Option 2, God did actually harden pharaohs heart through divine intervention. Even if this is true, we still see pharoah repeatedly rejecting God. God is justified in doing this because of the chances he already gave him. For all we know his advisors may have yet been in a position to talk him out of his current course of action. The bible, however, tells us his advisors hardened their own hearts as well.How is it justified? Again, why does he intervene with free will in order to make people reject him but doesn't do it to make them accept him? It doesn't make sense. Even if you say he was justified in doing so because the pharaoh rejected him several times before, for all you know he may have accepted him this last time. How are we supposed to know when God is the one who hardened his heart this time?Re: the scriptures you brought up in support of original sinYet, there are also bible verses which seem to contradict this idea:"The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father; neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him." Ezekiel 18:20 "The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin." Deuteronomy 24:16"But he slew not their children, but did as it is written in the law in the book of Moses, where the Lord commanded, saying, The fathers shall not die for the children, neither shall the children die for the fathers, but every man shall die for his own sin." II Chronicles 25:4These scriptures seem to be more clear about what they mean, yours, however, are a little more vague. "I was brought forth in iniquity" can simply mean they were raised by people who do sin, but not necessarily that they sinned themselves."Because all sinned" could be referring to how no one is perfect and everyone sins at some point in their life time. Mormonism is not a sect of Christianity, rather a cult founded only in the last few hundred years.And yet they try to follow the teachings of Jesus. I don't see how you can argue how any religion who tries to follow the teachings of Jesus, is not Christian. This is besides the point anyways. God made us as free willed individuals, and he will not force us to love himAnd yet he will force Pharoah to reject him? Why does he force people to reject him but not accept him? Additionally, he makes people believe in delusions(see 2 Thessalonians 2:10-11). So, why is it justified to make believe not believe in him, but it's not justified to make people believe in him? You can't argue one is justified and the other is not without applying double standards.Did President Trump create every person who was mocking him?Ok, suppose it's his children that mock him. He created them. Is President Trump a holy, perfect, and glorious character who is outside our wildest imagination?Neither is god, for if he was, he wouldn't put people to death for denying him or mocking him. Is President Trump without sin?God seems to be a leader that tells us what to do and doesn't follow what he tells us to do. If you were to apply the "thou shalt not kill" law to god, he did sin. However, I know you'll say those laws don't apply to god for some reason. Scripture tells us we all sin. Sin is anything we say, think, or do that breaks God's law. Breaking God's law is rejection. We have all rejected God by means of sin.Apparently god doesn't realize that people make mistakes. Just because a person makes a mistake, doesn't mean they reject that person as an authority figure. First off, could you explain where your morality comes from? Why does the state of being in the womb give you no rights to life, yet the state of being outside the womb suddenly makes you a valued human?I wasn't going off of what I believe is morally okay, but what most people consider morally okay, and likely what you think is morally okay. I would guess you believe it is morally wrong for a parent to kill their child, so why is it morally okay for God to kill his creations? It looks like you answered this later though, by saying because God owns all of us and everything is on loan to us, he has a right to take us away. I'll discuss the problem with that in the next point.The bible clearly indicates that God owns us.So, in other words, we're slaves to God and have no rights when it comes to God doing things to us, which seems to indicate even more so that the Bible is immoral. As stated before, we all sin daily. We all turn from and reject God.Again, we all make mistakes. Someone making a mistake can't be arguing for actively rejecting God. They could be trying their best to follow God, and I would argue this means they are not rejecting him. God, being a just God, must punish these transgressions of his glory, his standard.These laws, to begin with, are unjust according to most western standards of morality. Who thinks it's okay to murder homosexuals or stone adulterers nowadays? Many people think it is wrong to deny people marriage because they are the same gender. There are many things that would be considered unjust in today's society that God has a law for.