Anarcho capitalism.

Though I will go at it from a different angle as I'm Proo Capitalism and very close to AnCap, but there are just a few things I tend to disagree with here. I will be running a Minarchy Counter-plan. P1. The Government should only act to enforce the imperatives of Perfect Duties. P2. X does not meet the standard of a Perfect Duty. C1: Thus, the Government should not act to enforce X. ""Kant's first formulation of the CI states that you are to “act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law. .. Perfect duties come in the form ‘One mustnever (or always) φ to the fullest extent possible in C’, while imperfect duties, since they enjoin the pursuit of an end, come in the form ‘One must sometimes and to some extent φ in C’" [1]According to the above we see that Kant establishes two duties of that of the government; Perfect Duties and Imperfect Duties. Perfect Duties are those things of which the government must provide to ensure that the government and that society is fully functional. What are these things you may ask? These things are the simple things ensured under that of the Social Contract that you give up for a Civilized Society (not to kill, rape, steal, etc. .. [of which I'll get into here in a moement]). These things are indeed key as we can see that this ensures that of a Minarchy at the minimum. What that means is that the Government is to ensure that the people are safe. Everything else falls into that of the Imperfect Duties. Now note that these things may protect and benefit the public, we can see that if they're not of the Social Contract like ideals that they automatically fall into this category and SHOULD NOT be carried out by the government, but by Private entities. “Any action is right if it can coexist with everyone's freedom in accordance with a universal law, or if on its maxim the freedom of choice of each can coexist with everyone's freedom in accordance with a universal law” [2]We can see that if the government intervenes on the behalf on the people to infringe on that of an Imperfect duty that they would undermining humanity to achieve their due ends. We can see and must ensure that the Imperfect Duties are carried out by the Private Entites like trade and such. [3] As much as I would love to further privitization we can see that it would be improbable for the private companies to say, provide military protection. At this point we will end up with something like that of a great deal of Warlords much like what occured in Bosnia. There they would go from town to town and ask for reperations in return for pertection. [4] Though this can easily be dealt with, but when people stop paying or the warlords get into it for compeittion it could spell danger when it comes to the individuals in the cities and such. We would see that anarchy would be devistating. We could also look to the example of Somolia. They have no government and they are just a warring land and have been for some time. Not to mention that they are constantly plauged by pirates. Thomas Hobbes has also shown that humanity, by nature, is rotten. That we will rape and pillage everything unless we have a threat. The only thing dettering these acts are the threat of the law. [5] Thus the Social Contract must be created between individuals. So Person A gives up his right to kill Person B as long as he gives up his right to kill Person A. This is something that would ensure tranquility, but now the issue is, what of those who violate the Social Contract? If person A, a very popular guy, kills person B, a despised factory owner, then the public might rally around Person A and he might not face punishment, but if it was the other way around then Person B would be punished outright. There wouldn't be any just way of punishment outside of mock Salem Witch Trials like Kangagroo Courts. Another key issue with Anarcho-Capitalism is privitized currency. This is something that is a complete issue as it will be a return to the early US days when each state had different currency, but worse. It would require constant speculation. Multiple conversions and you could never side with one currency as the exchange market would be constantly and violently shifting so you might loose all your life savings in one fail swoop. [6] Even in the market today no one can perdict the volitility that it has and with what occurs with AnCap, it would destroy lives. Sources1. (. http://plato.stanford.edu...) 2. (Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy, translated Frederick Rauscher and Kenneth Westphal (in preparation). Relevant contents: "Naturrecht Feyerabend" course lecture, fragments on political philosophy, and drafts of works in political philosophy. ) 3. (Johnson, Robert. "Kant's Moral Philosophy. " The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2012. )4. (. https://www.hrw.org...)5. (. http://www.iep.utm.edu...) 6. Masters of Money: Friedrich Hayek BBC Documentary