f

Well, I'd like to commend my opponent for his beautiful reference to my profile pic (darker than black) and Welcome to DDO!Interpretation of the topicUnder the details of this argument, my opponent has only changed into a kibitzer. He continues to argue a definition that isn't really a definition. I challenge his defective and exhausted substratum, along with his impaired and loathsome hypothesis of the meaning of F. We shall now refer to the letter as the "F - word". The F word stands for only one thing, if you could even say it stands for anything at all. As proof, I shall ask you to walk up to the nearest teenager and say "F you." His/her following reaction should be a sufficient evidence to this warrant.But the sad reality is that the letter F has too many meanings, which for the purpose of debate, it is imperative "F" be left alone. The sole issue of the word is a straw man attack by Con. "F" is a mere title, he attacks that instead of the actual arguments against circles. Assuming that F has to stand for something, and then forcing me to support that topic is outright unfair and a violation of the rules that I mentioned at the beginning. For this sole reason, Con has lost the debate on conduct and procedures.The bomb itself is another characteristic of the malevolent inconsistency in the position of Con. It is the bomb that will end us, along with our posterity, but the bomb is only detonated by the blood of altruism, loyalty, and respect with the prick of F. My opponent has exploited the letter F - only bringing upon our unsightly and even more rapidly. His profuse and blatant use of "F" on such mediums as DDO only continues to shame the name or this website and burn into the eyes of readers. I ask that the reader (if this debate has ended) stop reading at this point, and scroll back up and vote Pro.CirclesMy opponent’s argument in this section is purely that since circles come in nature, they are better than inverted triangles. My response is that nature is evil. Does Con endorse natural disasters? Was he turned out when he heard news of Sandy or Katrina? Nature is a horrible example to morality. Sadly, the fact that circles are so associated with nature is a reason to vote against con. Now, on his proof, premise two is false. He claims that he is Jesus Christ, but I challenge this piece of information, for I am indeed actually Jesus Christ.1) If I am Jesus Christ, then you will vote for me.2) If you vote for me, then it is set that I am god. 3) Since I can be god, it becomes imperative that you do vote for me.1) People who support God will be saved.2) I am God.3) People who vote for me will be saved.Therefore, if you vote for me, then you will see that I am god and you will be savedThe fact that circles are impossible to draw with just paper and a pencil, coupled along with the reality that they are apparent in nature, just shows that circles are hellspawn. They could have only came from hell. P1. God created man in his imageP2. God created the worldC: Man should be able to recreate the world.This is true, to some extent.P1. If man should be able to recreate objects in nature, then everything should be within grasp.P2. If God created circles, then man should be able too. P3. Man cannot create perfect circles with his own power.C: God did not create circles. (We already know that God exists, because I am God)Since God didn’t create circles, it becomes reasonable to assume that Satan has created these devilish like shapes. ArtCircles are all the same. They all look the same, with only slightly different radii. Triangles, however, are far more random and customizable. It becomes apparent that drawing triangles is far more fun than drawing circles. If you know geometry, then you also know how important triangles are in proofs and etc. Vote Pro, because Pro endorses math. Math is good for science. Science is good for health. Pro wants you to live longer lives! Pro means less death. At best, weigh the impact of human life to “cosmic” art. Intentionally giving up lives also means the loss of morality and ethics. Without these important meaning, we will lose meaning to life. Not only will Con destroy human lives, but Con also destroys the meaning to those lives. ConclusionI have shown you how on multiple levels, good will be done if you vote Pro. I shalt become known as Jesus Christ; the voter becomes saved, and morality is preserved.Voting for Con is a direct link to Satan and Hell.It is obvious which side to choose, but I still shall give my opponent another chance to speak.