Humans can have morality without God.

This first point I would like to pick you up on is "As the examples (and common sense) have showed, one doesn't need any teachings of any religion to have morality." I am inclined to question the relevance of your "examples" to the argument of human morality. Firstly there is no need to use the plural 'examples' as you have actually only provided one example "Dogs don't believe in God but yet they can still learn to love you, respect you through building a relationship and mutual love, and not act like they caught rabies." Comparing the human capacity to understand right from wrong to that of a dog is a weak statement. One of the main features of human society that sets us apart from the animal word is our ability to have such strong beliefs therefore you cannot so simply compare human behaviour to that of an animal. In response to your statement that "religion has nothing to do with anyone learning morality" I can do nothing to disagree. It is a shame that you believe it to be necessary to spew "friendly fire in debating another atheist about this matter" and I assure you that just because I do not recognise the existence of God does not mean that I cannot appreciate and value religious teachings. Religion has been a significant part of our heritage for many years and religious teachings have, over time, been embedded into modern culture whether you recognise the existence of God or not. You have no evidence that religion has "nothing to do" learning what is right or wrong furthermore, by making this statement you are disregarding the influence religion has had on creating the society we recognise today. By this I am referring to the core teachings of many religions such as to be kind, to give charitably, to love, not to murder and not to thieve. These teachings that have been passed down the generations always influencing what we believe to be right and what we deem as wrong. I invite you to add some substance to your point of view rather than just criticising mine. I think you will find that attacking your opponent for the majority of your debate is a poor way to convey any real reasoning behind your own conclusion. Religion has always played a vital role in that human society as always deemed moral and it is impossible to prove that we would be the same without it. Therefore I reject the notion that the human race can be moral without god. P.s A large proportion of African culture are of a Christian faith furthermore, it is believed that Jesus travelled to Egypt in his youth therefore the idea that the African culture was never within the 'reach' of Jesus is a weak assumption. In addition, China is a multi-religious society with Buddhism having the most influence. And yes the Buddhist culture has its own depiction of 'god' In fact: "According to a latest survey, 85% of Chinese people have religious beliefs or had some religious practices and only 15% of them are real atheists. (The real atheists here refer to those who do not have faith in any religions nor had any activities related to religions or folk customs.) 185 million people believe in Buddhism and 33 million have faith in Christianity and believes in the existence of God. Only 12 million people are Taoists," (http://www.travelchinaguide.com...) which shows that religion can still play and important role in modern society.