Evolution by way of natural selection is a fact.

You said: "Yes, we know that inorganic-->organic. Non-life can produce life with all natural phenomena. So we have a well backed idea of where life plausibly originated here on earth." We know no such thing. We do know that organic compounds can be produced in the lab. That is not life. We also know that the compounds produced in the miller experiment had to be removed as they formed, since the same process that created them would have destroyed them. The "theory" that life can arise spontaneously is just that. A theory. There is no proof- no facts that it ever happened. You also used the word plausibly. That doesn't sound like a fact to me. You said: "You then said something that irritates me to no end "Evolution is a theory, and not even a well supported one." Wow! Scientific theories are facts and you already agree with me on that, so I shall demonstrate. Do you believe that there are microorganisms that invade our body and make us sick? Well this is a theory called "Pathogenic Theory" and guess what. This theory is a fact. There is no "Pathogenic Law". The theory is a fact. Do you believe that planets revolve around a central star in patterns called orbits? Well this is a theory called planetary theory and guess what. It's a fact. There is no "Planetary Law" the theory itself is a fact. Do you believe in plate tectonics as the explanation for earthquakes? Plate tectonics is a theory and a FACT. Evolution is just another one of these theories that are also facts. In fact, I've argued in the past, thanks to the many disciplines that confirm evolution, that the theory of evolution has more evidence than planetary theory." Can you say straw man argument? There is not a single proof for evolution. It's nothing but guess work and speculation. They talk a good game, but the Emperor has no clothes. You cannot show us one single "fact" that proves evolution. What you have is a bunch of data that seems to confirm it, but the data needs to be interpreted. The scientific method is not used in evolutionary study. There are no experiments that can be performed, since the events happened in the past. Evolution also has different meanings. It is an established fact that organisms can change over time. This is what's commonly known as adaptation. But there is not one example of a species evolving into another distinct species, or kind of life. Evolutionists claim that these minor changes can result in new species. There is no proof that this has ever happened. There is also the fact that there are different definitions of species. Some claim that minor changes that result in the inability to interbreed are new species, when in reality it should properly be defined as one KIND of life evolving into another distinct kind of life. Such as a lizard evolving into a bird. Scientists point to a feathered dinosaur as proof, but there is considerable controversy about this. Now, about that radiometric dating. Here's how it really works. It's too long to post here, so I'll simply provide the link. I strongly urge you to read it before voting. http://creation.com... You said: "I have never heard about this 90 degrees stuff, but whatever, the grand canyon has pre-cambrian rock that's over 400 million years old and all fossils that have been found on this earth have been found in the order of the layers of rock that you would expect from the predictions of evolution. You don't find old world monkey fossils in a layer on top of modern ape fossils because old world monkeys died out way before the modern apes existed. If you could demonstrate monkey on top of ape, you could win a Nobel prize, as you would change the face of evolutionary biology." You have failed to address my comment. I gave an example of layered sedimentary rock, each from a different geologic era, that are bent 90 degrees. If these layers are really millions of years old, they could not be bent without fracturing. Therefore, they cannot be millions of years old, nor are the fossils they contain millions of years old. Here's the article. http://answersingenesis.org...