The Federal Reserve should be abolished.

Con obviously did not understand me correctly, I guess in everything. Yeah, I used the word "cartel" because that is exactly what it is.I provided more than enough evidence to support my claims. But this time I will provide more. Just in case con needs a little reassurance. And yes it is international bankers. I explained how Paul Warburg was there. He was a banker and also a brother to Max Warburg who was head of the Warburg Banking Consortium in Germany and the Netherlands. He was also partners with Rothchilds Dynasty in England and France. He was also a partner in Kuhn Loeb & Co. This man helped create the FED.I provided the definition of cartelcartel-a group of independently owned businesses which come together for the purpose of reducing or eliminating competition between themselves to enhance their profit margin or to secure their positions in the market.Cartels will sometimes use the government to enforce their wants. An example of this would be like what happens in South America with the drug trade. They will pay off the police to get them to enforce their dirty work.But, again I showed ample evidence to support my claims. Frank Vanderlip even stated himself in one of his articles of the Saturday Evening Post how he helped create the Federal Reserve, and how that they did so in secret. He also stated that if anyone found out who all attended the meeting, the bill would certainly not pass. It is Round 2 if my opponent would like to refer to it again.He says this because he knew that if the people found out that the main people involved in the money trust, created the thing that was supposed to prevent the money trust, they would certainly not let it pass.The site that I posted is actually a summary of a book. The reason there are similar sites to that one is because it is more summaries or the speech he has given to support his claims.The book is called "The Creature from Jekyll Island." by G. Edward Griffin. If my opponent really had done research about this topic, he would have heard of this book. I will not rewrite all of my claims. I already stated them and provided enough evidence to support them. But here is a little more evidence. All of this is proven history. There's no secret. All of this is out in the open. http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.a-equals-a.com...http://www.youtube.com....The FED creates money...from NOTHINGSince its creation, the Federal Reserve Act has been amended 195 times. Its powers have become so broad that it can pretty much create money out of anything. "The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes." So spoke Federal Reserve Governor Benjamin Bernanke in 2002, prior to becoming the central bank's presiding chairman during the credit crisis and stock market crash of 2008. Now, its main income, is seigniorage revenue. That means that it "orders" new currency for cents on the dollar. So yes, they add money to the economy. But that is not the only thing it can create money. from. http://libertarianinvestments.blogspot.com...And yes, the FED can funnel money into the banks of the U.S. if it wishes. Yes, as it wishes. Congress has actually given the FED a high degree of independence because central bankers make "unpopular decisions." Yes, it destabilizes the economy.My opponent uses the statement. "The FED works maybe it is not perfect but it works" You know what else works? Concentration camps.My point is that it doesn't matter if it works or not. Anything can work and operate. My toilet operates. Its the fact that it doesn't work well. All of the things that my opponent stated the FED can do are correct. But, key word "can." Do they actually do most of that? No. Since its creation, all it has done is degrade the value of the dollar, destabilize the economy (which I explained above) and "operate" against the public interest. Because of this I urge the voters to vote Pro.And I apologize if my tone sounded a little negative. I don't wish to make my opponent feel unintelligent. Con is certainly are not intelligent. I just don't think con quite understood it all.