Jesus probably did not exist

You will recall that I have two arguments - no evidence for Jesus, lots of evidence against. In this round I will review these two points in light of my opponent's contentions.Evidence againstMy opponent does not rebut the first argument against, except for a general lack of external sources. Here are three web links:Orphic Dionysus: http://www.the-goldenrule.name...Zoroaster: http://en.wikipedia.org...Horus: http://www.religioustolerance.org... and http://www.religioustolerance.org...The best evidence comes from books and journal papers by academics, but seeing as my opponent didn't think those were proper sources last round and thus didn't count them in my case I'll just be done with these. The only other thing he says is that this is not proof. I agree, it is evidence, not proof. He also asks whether I suggest that none of these existed. You tell me - do you believe in Horus or Dionysus?On my second argument, my opponent gives a brief refutation of each of my contradictions:Matthew 1:17 and Matthew 1:2He says I'm skipping a generation. If that were the case, then 1) Matthew has made a grammatical error, and 2) Matthew 1:17 must list one generation too few, because the same structure applied to David is also applied to exile from Babylon. http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...2 Timothy 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 7:12This is not interpretation. Corinthians is a part of the scripture. It STATES it is not of God. Timothy STATES all scripture is of God. You cannot get more clear-cut than this. Look up the two verses for yourself.Acts 20:35Again this is not interpretation. The NIV Bible translates it thus: "the Lord Jesus himself said: ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive’". Jesus simply does not say this anywhere in the Bible.Luke 4:29First he rejects that Luke is canon. That's very unorthodox, but it does not disprove the evidence. Then he says it's in the Nazareth range. Note that Luke does not say "amidst mountains", he says Nazareth was on a mountain. The Hebrew is unambiguous as to the meaning of "on" - the antonym is "under".Matthew 14He says I should provide the records. Since my opponent apparently has a copy of Josephus' history, he should simply read that.Luke 2:1My opponent asks to prove the census as stated was impossible. Simple - Quirinus was not in charge at the time of Herod. There was a census, but it was later.Judas' endingInterestingly my opponent accepts the ending of the Gospel of Judas but rejects the canonical Gethsemane narrative. Unfortunately I cannot give a web link as the text is under copyright. You can buy a copy of the gospel at any good bookstore for a nominal fee (or you can look for it on Google Books). Highly recommended read.Thomas 42 and Luke 10:25-37My opponent adknowleges the contradiction and is absolutely sure one work is lying, but not the other. If one work is lying, how can he be so sure both works are not lying?Evidence ForMy opponent begins by admitting we have nothing but literary evidence for Jesus. He further agrees that non-canonical gospels are works of fiction. Therefore, these all provide evidence of a fictitious Jesus, since they are fiction and they state Jesus was real. His assertion that these provide evidence for his case, despite being works of fiction, is unsubstantiated. He further agrees that the literary evidence for Jesus is extremely sparse. I agree with my opponent's assertion that the story of Jesus flies in the face of what we would expect of the spread of the narrative of a real person, although this only confirms that the narrative does not fit the archtype of a true biography. So it's good that we have so much agreement in the debate.Now let's look at the evidence my opponent ignored. He ignored my discrediting of the gospels. I thought my Hitler analogy was pretty awesome. He ignored my discrediting of the Bible letters. And he ignored what I had to say about Josephus, Suetonius and Tacitus. So that he appears to have more references than me, he cites online copies of the latter with a web link - one of which is a digital transcription of a translation from the 1800s! He added Julius Africanus, who he admits wrote almost two centuries after Jesus' alleged death. He also quotes Pliny the Younger, who commits a very obvious Tacitus error for the same reasons as Tacitus himself did. And he also cites the Talmud. If you do a search on his source, you will note that he has obviously mis-quoted the Talmud, because the words he has put there do not appear on the page he uses as his source. So, assuming my arguments are correct because my opponent did not refute them, there remains no good evidence for Jesus.But what about my apparent lack of sources? First, note that my opponent has zero sources for the Bible. I provided several Bible verses where relevant. My opponent just assumed that the Bible says Jesus came in the flesh and did not provide evidence. Here's my sources, aside from a bit of logic and one or two facts my opponent has already himself conceeded:Mark being midrashic - http://www.robertmprice.mindvendor.com...Christ meaning anointed - http://en.wikipedia.org...Josephus being edited - http://www.godlessgeeks.com...Most of the letters being from long after Jesus' death - http://www.friktech.com... (note: pro-Christian estimates - benefit of the doubt)Mark composition date: http://en.wikipedia.org... (aim is obviously to be neutral, but sceptical criticism of this date is my own)Judean life expectancy: http://followingjesus.org... (note: pro-Christian estimate - benefit of the doubt)Where I have already revealed my sources in the last round, such as that none of the epistles talk about a human Jesus (you can read the epistles for yourself to find that out, I have many times over), I have not repeated them here.With so much of my case against being simply ignored, my opponent has done little more than spend over half his characters quoting the ancient texts, without actually engaging with my material. Until my opponent actually attacks my case, it stands and therefore I have met my burden of proof.The resolution is affirmed.