Jack vs The Police (Jack Murdered Mr Giant)

Thank you for posting. The defense would like to follow up on the statement given by Mrs. Giant. It's true, Mrs., Giant said, "who are you get out of here". However, when little Jack was confronted by here (and we're quoting Mrs. Giant from her statement) little Jack replied, "Please Mrs., I just want something to eat." If you look at the statement given by Mrs. Giant, you'll see that she was legitimately worried for the welfare of little Jack. When Jack said he was just hungry, she replied, ""Never mind that, if my husband comes down, he will eat you…" A moment later, she heard Mr. Giant coming downstairs and was so terrified for the welfare of little Jack; knowing full well that the Giant would eat him, she hid the boy in her cupboard. She then left it open a crack so that the boy could breathe. Ladies and gentleman, its obvious that Mrs. Giant cared for the boy, so much so that she allowed him in her house and hid him from a GIANT psychopath. After hiding in the cupboard for awhile, Jack noticed the goose, with the golden egg that had been laid. Once the giant had fallen asleep, Jack decided to grab the goose and leave. Mrs. Giant saw little Jack and whispered, "Quick, run like the wind, before he wakes up. Keep that goose quiet." As you can see, Mrs. Giant was concerned about what a man that kills without reason would do to a little boy who was hungry. She knew that her husband and herself where well off and even let the small boy take the golden egg laying goose. The prosecution said, and I quote, "He would lie if had to. So just think about his interview. He did not ask for permission to enter the house." That is true, jack did not necessarily ask for permission to enter the house, but once he was inside, Mrs Giant decided to ensure that his safety was her top priority. Did Mrs. Giant attempt to kick Jack out after understanding how belligerent Mr Giant was? Did Mrs. Giant call Mr. Giant? Did Mrs. Giant call the police? The answer to those questions is an unequivocal no. NO. Therefore, one would have to assume that she was concerned for the small boy and wanted to ensure that he was kept safe. The defense would like to touch on Albert Morse's statement. We would like the good ladies and gentleman of the jury to understand that whether Jack was troubled as a younger boy is circumstantial and has little bearing on this case. After looking at the sworn statements of Mrs. Giant and little Jack Jones, we can see that Jack was in fear of his life. That he was given no other choice when A man (quoted by Mrs. Giant) was yelling, ""I will carve you up. I will crunch your bones to make my bed." Ladies and gentleman, does that sound like a man trying to defend his property? Moreover, the giant was on the beanstalk when he fell. If he was concerned about his property, why did he not call the police rather than yelling death threats? Jack was no longer on the property of Mrs. Giant and yet this man was chasing little Jack, yelling death threats. This is an obvious case of self-defense. IMPORTANT: READ BELOW ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IMPORTANT: READ BELOW The defense would like the jury to see that the prosecution violated the rules of this case and used a witness they had no access to. The rules clearly state, "I (the defense) am not allowed to use any of the prosecutions material in my debate unless it is first used by the prosecution. Likewise, the prosecution may not use any of my (Defense's) material unless it is first used by me. To further explain, once you use ANY PART of your material, it is fair game to me and vice versa. However, the copy of the Charge/Fact Sheet and the copy of Legislation and legal notes are fair game for either side to use at anytime in the debate." Therefore, ALL THE INFO THE PROSECUTION USED BY MRS NORA JONES WILL BE COMPLETLEY THROWN OUT AND DISREGARDED. Therefore, the conclusion drawn by the prosecution cannot be used because it is nearly completely based on a statement that could not be used by the prosecution.