Woman, Children, and child pornography

How can you be against something you have never seen? I HAVE seen a nuclear blast on TV and I also HAVE seen the devastation in Japan. I HAVE seen pictures of children being abused like the picture of the nine-year-old running naked on a road after being severely burned from a Napalm bomb in Viet Nam. I HAVE also seen pictures of some of the ONE MILLION children under five killed as a result of US bombs in Iraq. I HAVE seen pictures of a murder scene but I have NEVER seen CP. Why aren't those other images banned? The mind games and tricks are no longer working; I"ve seen the man pulling the levers behind the green curtain. Law is supposed to be based on FACTS. MY site, " www.TruthMovement.us" has over 2,000 research papers. I referenced one a study that was done in the Chez Republic. If you have a problem with the study I suggest you contact the author. "Everybody can read."? Who is everybody? A single website with a clear agenda to legalize CP imagery? Which site is that? As I have stated www.TruthMovement.us has over 2,000 research papers and not one penned by me. So what your doing is copying and pasting the Demand Project website full of false and fantastic statistics' " http://www.thedemandproject.org...;; This topic can easily be manipulated by individuals such as yourself that have an agenda. You are most likely one of those radical religious right individuals that consider all porn CP. http://www.truthmovement.us... My premise was, "what have Legislators, radical right feminists given us, in the name of protecting woman and children first from "stranger danger" and now from the Wild Wild Web?" " CP arrests are made using deception and disinformation". http://www.truthmovement.us... I also stated those who hands-on abuse children should be jailed, not the ones that look at pictures that societies children who by law are unable to make a choice until 18 leave their nakedness plastered all over the internet and in chat rooms. You state, "you just want to be ALLOWED to watch CP without being arrested!". Where did I state that? You are obviously on a mission what mission is hard to tell. What I have is a research site that contains over 2000 articles that contradict what you have to say. FACT Over 95% of child sexual abuse(CSA) is infamilial meaning the child KNOWS the abuser, and it has nothing to do with strangers. Today people like yourself are to be close-minded, distracted, ignorant of the truth, too-busy, uninformed. You most likely are also Intensely conservative and may not, for a whatever reason, have the time, inclination, or political will to look at new evidence that might run contrary to their ingrained beliefs lacking, intelligence, uninformed; therefore people may unconsciously or reflexively reject new information, even if the evidence is overwhelming and probably true. Child sexual abuse and CP used to be synonymous and referred to a form of CSA in which an adult or older adolescent used someone under 18 for sexual gratification. However today children are making their pornography with smartphones and webcams, and it is these advancements in technology that have changed the nomenclature. Today we come to know CP as pornography made by people under 18 years, and images of adults sexually abusing a child as CSA crime scene images(CSAI); However in fact as in most areas of controversy, the views of the ignorant, or pseudo-ignorant, have the field almost unopposed on this issue. Today CP is pornography made by children. Adult Pornography is pornography made by adults. Adults who have sex with children and record that abuse with images is called images of abuse and crime scene evidence(CSACSI). The real danger is the public extremely flawed understanding of the problem. "To prevent these crimes, we need accurate information about their true dynamics," said Janis Wolak, a lead child sexual abuse researcher who also states, "The things that we hear and fear and the things that actually occur may not be the same.". You have attempted to hijack the debate. I wanted to have a discussion; However, it is obvious you want something more The plain facts are LE could develop a bot to find the CP using their hash-values and when encountered erase them. The fact it is WORLD WIDE WEB not the USA web and not every country has the same laws. Also once CP is on the internet it's there forever somewhere. I also stated that those who hands-on abuse children should be jailed, but not the ones that look at pictures. Lastly nowhere do I say I want to be allowed to do anything. The following is from ICE website, " While we will continue to prioritize the arrest of child predators, we cannot arrest our way out of this problem: education is the key to prevention.". The government says that it can not arrest its way out of it. If you cant why waste taxpayer dollars? https://www.ice.gov... "Created to solve the problem of child sexual abuse, child pornography law...has grown dramatically in the past two decades, expanding and proliferating along with the underlying problem that it targets. Curiously, the law's expansion has not solved the problem, but only presided over its escalation." Amy Adler, Associate Professor, New York University School of Law. http://www.truthmovement.us...