Post Nuclear War Survival

I will also be adding Bill Waters to my team. Now I know what many of you readers are thinking, but there are only enough supplies for 7 people and yourself? Why is this fool suggesting that a 9th team member stay when there are only enough supplies for 8? Well ladies and gentlemen let explain my resourcefulness. My opponent came up with the idiotic idea to "which people will be required to leave. We will assume that those who are selected to leave will do so peacefully. At issue is the survival of humans. " However, I have no intention of having anyone leave. Therefore my team will kill and eat the following people: 1. Fred Frederick 2. Majorie Blaylock 3. Gerald White To adequately feed Bill Waters for three months. Thus my team will consist of 9 people with a confident leader while my opponent's team will consist of only 8 people and will be a team picked by someone who has no confidence in himself to lead the group. The Differences between his team and mine: 1. My opponent has one less person 2. My opponent has Fred Frederick, and Majorie Blaylock, and Himself While I have Wanda Brice, Michael Patterson and Me. 3. My leader is a 20 year old man, his leader is a 13 year old girl 4. My teammates aren't stupid enough to waste meat. -----Why I am better and more capable than both Fred Frederick, Majorie Blaylock and My Opponent ----- 1. I am stronger than all three of them put together. (Fred Frederick a man past his prime, Majorie Blaylock a weak woman in poor health, and my opponent who is so weak that he actually believes a 13 year old girl (Janie Stanley) to be more capable of leading this band. 2. I am more confident and better looking than all three of them. Fred (an old man no way beats a 20 year old man in the prime of his life), Majorie (a fat middle aged woman) and my opponent (who is so under-confident in himself that he fails to give any description of himself which is obviously indicative of bad looks and a lack of confidence) 3. I am more healthy than all of them my health is above excellent. Fred's is only excellent, Majorie's is poor, and my opponent's health obviously can't be too good if he doesn't have the energy to type a description of himself. 4. I am more intelligent then all of them. My IQ is 138 (as stated in R1). Fred's is only 132, Majorie's is only 133, and my opponent's cannot be much higher than 110 if he chose a 13 year old child to lead the group instead of himself. 5. I am younger and can procreate more than both Majorie and Fred, and since I have more confidence than my opponent I can easily mate with more females than my opponent making my reproductive capacity the most superior 6. I have more/superior education than all of them. Fred never specifies a college education neither does my opponent and that just leaves Majorie. Now seemingly Majorie is very educated having gone through Med school. However I object. Look at Majorie's health for a measure of her abilities as a healer. Having poor health but supposedly having lots of education in the medical field. It doesn't add up. Thus I am labeling Majorie's education as being an inferior one. After all, if you can't heal yourself who can you heal? ------Why Wanda Brice is better and more capable than both Fred Frederick, Majorie Blaylock and My Opponent ----- 1. Wanda Brice is more intelligent than all of the three differences. She has an IQ of 140. Fred's is only 132, Majorie's is only 133, and my opponent's cannot be much higher than 110 if he chose a 13 year old child to lead the group instead of himself. 2. Wanda is more healthy than Majorie Wanda is fair, while Majorie's is poor. 3. Wanda is more caring and is a better Peace maker In desperate times fights occur, people need mental healing. Who can do that job? Not someone who experience only in electronics (which consequentially won't be utilized for quite some time) (Fred) Not someone who thinks a 13 year old girl is a better leader than him (my opponent) and not some quack of a doctor who can't even heal herself (Majorie). Wanda is far superior I have clearly shown both myself and Wanda to be far superior to my opponent's choices, while I don't have room for Michael Patterson, she is a female in decent shape and has great reproductive capabilities. Having shown both myself and Wanda to be superior choices than any of the three of my opponents choices, plus the fact that I have an extra player clearly gives my team a solid advantage. Not to mention we are led by an intelligent and confident leader. Most Capable: My opponent didn't pick himself and instead picked a 13 year old girl. Obviously I am superior to Janie in terms of health, IQ, leadership, physical strength etc. There is no argument or doubt. Not to mention I was picked by someone as confident as I am, myself. My opponent doesn't even have confidence in himself. How plausible is it that we should have confidence in one of his choices? Least Capable: John Davis - He's only in fair health, he has knowledge of how to make an atomic bomb, and he's older. Furthermore he's a male and will only provide competition with the true leader of the group, myself. One thing I don't want in my new world is even the knowledge of how to make a nuclear weapon. My opponent tells me to assume that we are the only survivors on earth. However my group is smart. We know that if you assume, you only make an AS_S out of U and ME. We will take no chances that the knowledge of how to make an atom bomb will survive. "Nowhere does it say that these people are related and if my opponent is operating on the assumption that they are this severely limits the reproductive gene pool. " Of course it does not explicitly say the two groups are related but seriously it stands only to basic reason and logic, a trait which my opponent clearly does not possess which is another reason my group is superior. The situation assumes that 12 people "were able to reach a fallout shelter in time" meaning that there was a rush and the people in the shelter live right next to each other. Furthermore the IQ's of the children and their parents are closely related for reason. It only stands to basic logic that those who have the same last name live in the same house and thus are related/ father/daughter mother/son relationships. Yes this limits the gene pool, however as you can see, which is why it is important that I have an extra player and only enhances my standing. To conclude: I have proven my choices to be vastly superior, my group has more people, My leader (person who picked the group) is superior, intelligent, confident, strong, healthy, and young. My opponent (who picked the group) is not confident in himself, and shows a lack of basic logic and reasoning skills when looked in conjunction with the fact that he picked a 13 year old his leader suggests that his mental state might not be particularly well-put together. Thus my group was picked by someone far more capable.