The existence of a God is fundamentally impossible

Interesting point you raise in regards to something which a species that claims to be rational has reached to the conclusion to the fact that it exists is somehow transcendent of all logic? That is a nonsensical point to base your entire debate upon! If we reach a conclusion that an entity in fact exists, then we have accepted that our process of logical reasoning have reached a conclusion of its existence it cannot somehow 'transcend' our process of logical reasoning. If you can neither show that God is existent nor possible through logical reasoning, then God is an impossible phenomenon. God seems to only be justified in that we want a higher power to exist so it must be there. God never began: if something never begins, it never existed. God will never end; this is impossible.You define impossible as 'Not able to occur, exist, or be done. Or, something that cannot be done.' God is not able to occur because for something to occur it must begin. God is not able to exist because anything that exists can end (it might exist for eternity but if it can end then it exists. God cannot be 'done' but I believe you are referring to impossible actions as opposed to impossible entities with the word done.I do not see how on Earth your Rocky versus Rambo example applies in the slightest! We are not comparing any two people here, we are discussing whether God is or is not fundamentally possible!Now for my rebuttals; 'God is logically impossible' well if God is logically impossible I believe you have just agreed with the proposition of this debate. You are supposed to be opposing that God is impossible but if something is logically impossible then I fail to see how it is possible. That is like me saying that is logically impossible that my (biological) mother is naturally a man, but she just is. I said naturally so as to make it clear there is no trans-gender operations involved.Secondly, 'We can show that he is logically contradictory' I find it amusing how you suggest that God is male which indicates how God was just a tool invented by men to control women but that is a separate debate although especially in the Muslim culture this seems very blatant, I have lived in Dubai I know this. Also logically contradictory is the same as illogical. The term illogical as defined by the highly regarded 'Dictionary.com' I shall source my definition: http://dictionary.reference.com...it is defined as "contrary to or disregardful of the rules of logic" now I shall define logic so as to relate it back to the definition of illogical. According to definition 3 http://dictionary.reference.com... system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study." so now I shall infer the definition of logic back into the definition of illogical "contrary to or disregardful of the rules of the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study." All I have done is replace the word logic with the definition of logic. Now I shall use that definition in what you said to make it clear what exactly you have just stated about God; 'We can show that he is contrary to or disregardful of the rules of the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study." All I have done is altered the term 'logically contradictory' with my definition of illogical.Now I shall replace every quote in your debate where you use anything to indicate God being illogical and replace the word with the definition of illogical to explain what you have actually said.Original quote: "God is rationally impossible."My explanation of what you said: "God is contrary to or disregardful of the rules of the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study."Original quote: "God is logically impossible"My explanation of what you said: "God is contrary to or disregardful of the rules of the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study."Original quote: "God's inexistence is not given, simply that, rrationally, one cannot defend the premise"My explanation of what you said: "God's inexistence is not given, simply that the premise of God is contrary to or disregardful of the rules of the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study."I will not patronise you anymore. The conclusion of my debate is the title of the debate. The existence of a God is fundamentally impossible.