There is not enough evidence to prove that I am not the easter Bunny.

INTRO ============================ Thank you for posting your last argument. There is not to much I need to say this round seeing that my point is already made. I will break my argument into three parts. ARGUMENT ============================ First of all, my opponent has almost forfeited this round. One should know that you must debate off of the original definitions. You can not go back and change the meaning. You may have been able to pull that off, but if you look back at your own definition in round one you would see that your definition says: "THE Easter Bunny is a character depicted as an anthropomorphic rabbit. In legend, the creature brings baskets filled with colored eggs, candy and toys to the homes of children on the night before Easter" Your own source admits that we are talking about The Easter Bunny. You also said, "So in order for Pro to be THE Easter Bunny, he must be an animal (non-human) with human characteristics. Who GIVES EGGS, CANDIES, and TOYS to good children and is almost 400 years old" You claimed yourself that if this were possible than I would be The Easter Bunny. Now you want to go back on your own argument? I am sorry but that is not how it works. I have been debating off of your argument own arguments. So you can not change them whenever you please. You have still failed to prove that I am not the Easter Bunny. --------------------------------------------------- Secondly, in round 3 I did give a possibility that I could be the Easter Bunny you speak of in your story. I said myself, "Even if we were going by the story you listed you would have to prove that I do not get powers later on. Even if the story does not say I do, something else could have given me powers, since I already exist. One of my favorite quotes is, "Not everything is written down on paper. And not everything written down on paper is true." You failed to refute that, therefore you have not deafened your own claim. There are many things that have happened in history that people do not read in their history books. There are also many things that have happened that are not in history books at all. ---------------------------------------------- Lastly, You failed to attempt to refute my argument about your story not being the first story. Many stories are changed around. Most of your source and other sources tell of how it is possible that it was the first story. But no one knows for sure. Read this article, "The original Easter bunny was PROBABLY associated with the Pagan equinox festival that predated Easter. The Saxons devoted the month of April to celebrating their goddess of spring and fertility, who was, not coincidentally, named Eastre. Eastre's sacred animal was the hare - not surprising since the rabbit is one of the most common symbols of fertility and rebirth." In January 2009 I dyed my hair bright purple for the fun of it. Now, if someone saw that and writes it down that I was blessed by a goddess that gave me purple hair, will that mean that I never had my hair dyed without a goddess? Of course not. OUTRO ============================= After careful thought I have decided to accept my opponents offer. This will be the last post. I thank my opponent for this fun and cleaver debate. I would also like to thank the audience for reading. Please vote Pro. Sources: (1). http://www.holidays.net...