Your Pick

I. Cross-Examination"Notice that it says extremely unlikely. Not impossible. Plus the fact that one cannot understate the power of the human mind."Unfortunately for my opponent, he has not proved that he falls within that range of unlikely possibility. Therefore we have to assume that his mental powers are in line with that of every other human being. Also, it is quite simple to understate the power of the human mind. "The power of the human mind is very miniscule" "Whether or not you hate someone rather is a choice. You can choose to accept or reject or certain type of person. As for the lying, let me point out this. In the comments 9spaceking says, "lol pro is such a troll". So we can assume that the choice of topic that pro made was a troll choice. Now despite this choice I have not taken issue with this and am debating it, not raving for him being a troll." Accepting/rejecting someone and hating someone are 2 completelly different situations. It is possible to reject something you love of accept something you hate, the two are not intertwined. You cannot, however, choose what you love and hate. Those types of things are not chosen, but rather aquired.As for the lying, Con has not given us any reason to trust that the bias of this debate isn't affecting his declaration of not hating trolls. Further in Con's statement, he says that despite me making a troll-like argument, he takes no issue with and demonstrates this by not raving me for being a troll. There are 2 problems here. First, Con could simply be lying again about not having an issue with my troll argument. Second, just because Con isn't raving on me for trolling does not strictly imply that he does not hate trolls like me. There is nothing saying that one must rave on everything they hate."Rather or not he can tell I hate trolls is impossible as humans are given the ability of choice. I can choose to hate a man or forgive him and accept him anyway. "Once again, my opponent says that he can choose what he hates. His supporting reason however is still lacking. It is not necesarily the case the one must either hate or forgive somebody. Both can happen is conjunction with eachother. Choosing to forgive somebody does not certainly mean that you no longer hate that person. Just as not forgiving somebody does not mean you completely hate that person.How an individual acts towards a person and how they feel about that person are two seperate events where one does not always cause the other. So you can choose to forgive a man, but that doesn't mean you also choose to not hate him."As for looking at my profile, you do have to remember that it is 3 weeks old and so not up to date with my personal ideas and so using something posted over a month ago is of little use as proof." Evidence does not expire. My claim still stands. The profile made a month ago was not made with the influence of this debate so the information there can be more trustworthy than my opponent's current statements. If my opponent is indeed lying then he still hates trolls. The pre-biased statements on Con's profile tell us that he does and therefore it can be concluded as such.II. Photographic Evidence III. ConclusionI feel that the above evidence is enough to fulfill my BoP. All of Con's refutations were rebutted.