BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
On the Topic of Free-will, Surely in a scientific world must not exist!

While i agree with the definition of free will, I do believe you have misinterpreted the definition. Either way my argument still stands, For starters certain factors is not clearly defined on wikipedia, so im going to pull from stanford's plato encylopedia. "free will is the ability to select a course of action as a means of fulfilling some desire." (I feel this definition to be vastly more substantial as "Unconstrained by certain factors" is way to similar to the vagueness of metaphysics). Now for the sake of why i choose this definition over yours (and surely you can agree) picking and choosing which external factors or comparable with free-will is a fallacy, any action/brainwave/value/environmental stress or even reaction that forces the individual to react in a predictable way that is outside of their control. This is purely philosophical conjecture, not holding up modern science's view. To use your example, the person who defeated the thief in combat (being a loose term for what just happened in your example) the thief was left with two options. Then in your own words you manage to bring him/her down to one choice, With the unconscious mind deliberating behind closed doors (a metaphor I am using for being outside of personal choice or free will whichever you wish to call) and then acting on said(or better yet non-spoken) decision. Of course, this manifests itself in split seconds in response to the rapid flow of events in the environment (the rest of the scenario). As opposed to the last half of your third paragraph, if an external factor (the kids and the parents) drives the individual to cross out possibilities from the list of things to do, that is also a compromising factor of free-will. As the subject is affected by environmental stimuli rather than subjective choice. Modern Science currently takes this argument a multitude of steps further starting with neurological synapses that fire off moments before a action takes place. So while you may think your creating every word in your sentence, your unconscious mind works milliseconds before you in order to further construct your wording, or any other endeavor that humans may do. To cite an example of millisecond behaviors that run our lives, think of catching a baseball/football/ or any other physical activity. Since the days of childhood you have done this, after you have acquired the basic technique your body remembers the muscle movements and (to quote David Eagleman an amazing Neurologist) rapidly programs your body to do these events so your conscious mind may perform the task. To end this round I would like to say that your physics example fail in light of your own definition of free-will as it is not an agent that is allowed to make a decision or choice.
The delorean is the best sci-fi vehicle of all time

Time travel has always fascinated me. The ability to go back and change things has a certain appeal. But if I could choose a way to go back through time, considering that in this fantasy world there are a few options, I"d go with Doc Emitt Brown"s Delorean instead of, say, H. G. Wells' invention. Of course I do prefer the second, upgraded version with the Mr. Fusion garbage to fuel conversion unit and the ability to fly. Seriously who wouldn"t want that? In a country like India we"d never run short of fuel. How great would that be?
The delorean is the best sci-fi vehicle of all time

when the Back to the Future trilogy came out it was very different from most cars. The style was different and especially the material used. So between it being mid-engined and the body being made out of stainless steel, it has a great sci-fi look. Too bad it does not drive as good as it looks. Because it has the ability to travel through time! And it looks pretty cool; kinda like an old school Lambo.
The delorean is the best sci-fi vehicle of all time

It is unspecified what Destiny is made of. The Ancients seem to be fans of highly explosive superconducting material, though, their favorite being Naquadah. One Stargate has enough Naquadah in it to blow up an entire planet, for reference. The time-traveling ability is a bit unique. Time travel works differently in Stargate - all time travel jumps have a minimum jump distance of a few decades, and the only way to return is to go through a wormhole at the precise moment of a solar flare again. In addition, it avoids paradoxes by using alternate timelines (or well-executed loop sequences in existing timelines). Effects on the main timeline are demonstrated in a few episodes (SGU: "Twin Destinies"). Due to the difficulty of doing these things, time travel is only used as a last resort for cutting losses. Destiny also wasn't supposed to be new (at the ripe old age of 60 million) - if you want futuristic, try Atlantis (a flying city ship) - it's only 10,000 years old!
The delorean is the best sci-fi vehicle of all time

My opponent has chosen the DeLorean as his candidate for the best sci-fi vehicle of all time. My choice: This thing? It's name is Destiny. It is a 60-million year old ship. Now, while it is true that 60 million years will put some wear and tear on a ship, Destiny still has plenty of its glory. Note that spoilers for Stargate Universe follow. This is not particularly bad, since people in the Stargate series have always had a very difficult time dying and staying dead. Still, don't say I didn't warn you.One of the main things about Destiny that makes it the best is its unique AI that directs it on its course. I mean, seriously, that AI kept the ship running for 60 million years. That's what I call reliable. Of course, the AI sometimes seems like an unsympathizing little prick, but if that happens, it can be overridden from the bridge. And once you've caused the death of a few team members (with the AI voicing its objections by manifesting itself as a hallucination of your dead wife), you can admit that it was right, apologize, and stop whining about the fact that your crew is about to starve.One of the main duties of Destiny's AI is acquiring power. You stated that the DeLorean turns trash into fusionable isotopes. I will concede that this is a novel means of power generation that the Ancients lacked. Destiny was powered by fusion, though, just in a different way. Destiny's route is more or less going in one direction for a long time. Now, in space, what means of power generation could one find in mass quantities, and how would one harvest that? The answer is a star, and the other answer is fly right into it! Destiny is equipped with solar power collectors, meaning that whenever it is hungry for more power, it can just find the nearest red dwarf. This has the side effect of scaring the hell out of the crew (Destiny's means of hazing its crew, if you prefer).Now, it is also known that the DeLorean has the ability to travel through time. This can happen with Destiny as well. It is equipped with a Stargate (a dusty old prototype one at that), which has a few quirks that can result in time anomalies. Stargates generate a wormhole for instantaneous travel. When this wormhole crosses a solar flare, strange things happen. You can even wind up in the same place you started (with the exception that you've traveled 2000 years into the past. And while it's not supposed to do this, strange things can happen while dialing inside of a star, especially if you are dialing a 9-chevron address. Please don't try this, since you'll probably end up with a copy of your ship, a copy of your best scientist, and you'll find the people from a civilization that you founded 2,000 years ago in an alternate timeline. It's best not to try this.
Trump's immigration policy.

I am unable to watch the video at the moment, but when I get the chance to I will. I am for Trump's immigration policy because it is an extra procedure to make sure we are safe when allowing foreigners to come into our country and become a US citizen. My mom is an immigrant from the Philippines. She was abused and knew nobody, but she managed to come here legally. Why should people just be able to come here whoever they are from wherever. Shouldn't we be allowed to make sure they're safe and don't want to harm us?
The United States Federal Government should repeal the current policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

Ah... it would seem I have made an error. I do have the final say. Oh well, time to give it my all now. I'm going to prove why DADT should be amended and NOT repealed. Just kidding, Raisor! I will only answer the direct questions you made and correct the errors you have made, out of fairness. <> Hearsay. Also, no proof. I could just as easily say that a Four-Star General said that your sources were totally wrong. < > I do not need to explain what the amendment would be. It is an option that should be considered, rather than exercising a repeal. << 1)In what dictionary is "fixed" listed as a synonym for repeal?>> I clearly quoted you and made clear that FIXED is the synonym for AMEND. Here, check it out: http://thesaurus.reference.com... << 2)"Fixed" is ambiguous and could mean any number of things. I clearly specified that I meant "repeal," so my position has never changed.>> I'll grant you a misquote, but this point strikes me as "back-peddling". < > I agree. I haven't made any new arguments, as I did honestly believe that Raisor had the last argument, which I am very sorry. < > This, I don't believe so much. But I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt. < > I don't agree. The foundation is strong and academically it is progressive and adequate for the times. It just needs fine tuning.
The United States Federal Government should repeal the current policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

< > (I appreciated your declaration of victory. It gave me a good laugh, so thank you.) I posted, "I agree with many of your points, but not all of them." I later posted: "Since most of your argument is based on your own personal opinions, it seems, I'd appreciate it if you could tell me how long you've been a member of the United States Armed Forces." Until you answer this question, your arguments have no validity because you would have us respect your analysis as if you were from an Army Four-Star General. << 1)Every stat in my readiness argument was cited. I did relatively uncontroversial analysis. Even if you believe that my other arguments should be ignored because of lack of sources, my readiness argument stands and I hold the readiness argument to be the most important issue in the round.>> My initial argument still stands, as you indicate in your following sentence. < > The USFG should AMEND the current policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." You yourself just used the term "fixed" which is a synonym for "AMEND"; not repeal. This debate is over as you've changed your stance on the issue and now agree with me. Thanks for the debate. < > I disagree with this statement and the structure that my opponent would have me conduct my arguments. This is a three-round debate and if/when I choose to address his issues is entirely up to me, which is quite fair as my opponent has the final say in Round 3. As opposed to arguing the debate, he's more focused on the voting. Voters, in fairness, please don't be distracted by this, but critique his skills based on his abilities. Thank you.
The United States Federal Government should repeal the current policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

The USFG should AMEND the current policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." I agree with many of your points, but not all of them. When something does work out the way you want it to, you don't always just scrap it. Especially when it can be fixed. The USA doesn't function all that well, nor does it have a history of doing so, but we didn't abolish the US to rebuild a newer and better nation. We did as we always do; we do our best to make things better, little-by-little. Since most of your argument is based on your own personal opinions, it seems, I'd appreciate it if you could tell me how long you've been a member of the United States Armed Forces. Thank you.
December Tournament Round 2: Jews are going to heaven.

According to the resolution, I must prove that, according to the Bible, at least some Jews are, in modern times, going to heaven. Now for my rebuttals: Your first claim is that Jewish beliefs found in their sacred texts say horrible things about Jesus and Mary, so Jews can't go to heaven. This is only true if belief in Jesus is the only way to be saved. Christians who say this often quote the following verse: "Jesus said to him [Thomas], 'I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the father except through me.'" (John 14:6) That verse, however, says nothing about belief. Other verses say that good deeds get you to heaven: "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven." (Matthew 7:21) "What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have good works?" (James 2:14) "[God] will repay everyone according to his works: eternal life to those who seek glory, honor, and immortality through perseverance in good works." (Romans 2:6-7) Jews can be good people, so according to the Bible, they can go to heaven. Your next argument is about geneology. That is not relevant to the debate because, according to my definition of "Jew", I am referring to Jews as a religious and not an ethnic group. As for your last argument, it is based on a conspiracy theory that must be proven for your argument to be valid. Have fun with your rebuttals!
December Tournament Round 2: Jews are going to heaven.

"A hardening has come upon Israel in part, until the full number of the Gentiles comes in, and thus all Israel will be saved." (Romans 11:25-26) "Elijah went up to heaven in a whirlwind." (2 Kings 2:11) "Then I saw another angel come up from the East, holding the seal of the living God. He cried out in a loud voice to the four angels who were given power to damage the land and the sea, 'Do not damage the land or the sea or the trees until we put the seal on the foreheads of the servants of God.' I heard the number of those who had been marked with the seal, 144,000 marked from every tribe of the Israelites." (Revelation 7:2-4)
December Tournament Round 2: Jews are going to heaven.

Definitions Jew- a member of the religious group that originated from the Israelites and Hebrews of the the Ancient Near East. Heaven- (define this for me, I'm not sure how you would define it) Rules Use the Bible as a source. Do not use other sources except for interpretations of the Bible. The burden of proof is shared. The round structure will be: 1. Acceptance 2. Arguments (no rebuttals) 3. Rebuttals/Defense 4. Rebuttals/Defense 5. Conclusions ("I won this debate because. .. ") Thanks to Hayd for hosting the tournament.
Big Nigga is no more, Lanky Nigga is where it's at

Great to see that you finished your argument. You only voiced your opinion and a subjective view on the "greatness" of the Big Niggas. I'm sorry but I'm going to have to disagree with Big Niggas being great in comparison to Lanky Niggas. Sure, Big Niggas can be great, but that doesn't make them better than Lanky Niggas, nor does it mean they are worse. However, Lanky Niggas are simply statistically, logically, physically, and mentally proven to be superior. Exhibit A: Breathing. -Since Lanky Niggas have less fat on they's bones, their rib cage is given more room. So, their diaphragm is more able to move downward. Because of this, Lanky Niggas can breathe easier than Big Niggas. -Since breathing is important and Lanky Niggas are more capable of breathing than Big Niggas, this is an obvious advantage. Exhibit B: Movement. -This shouldn't come as a surprise. We all know that Big Niggas have a hardass time getting around. Since Lanky Niggas do not have excess body fat, they can move with more freedom and control. This allows for a more vigilant and agile race of Niggas. -Because of this, more Lanky Niggas are able to participate in sports, resulting in a healthier lifestyle, resulting in a more positive attitude on life. -Lanky Niggas can DANCE. I mean just look at them go. Exhibit C: Healthy Heart. -Again with the fat. Since Lanky Niggas lack excess fat, they have less of a risk for cardiovascular disease. -So, less Lanky Niggas will die, thus resulting in their rise in dominance. Exhibit D: Style. -Big Niggas always have to search for this XXXL+ sizes. This kills their vibe. Since Lanky Niggas do not face this problem, they can style themselves more easily than Big Niggas since less companies make extremely large sizes for all kinds of clothing. -Better looks = better chance to have sex = better chance to reproduce. -Lanky Niggas do not have to suffer the case of Doublous Chinnitis (Double Chin). Exhibit E: Sex. -Most women will agree that it's easier to have sex with a nigga who isn't 3 times your body mass and can kill you by simply landing on you from pure exhaustion from sex. This does not include Big She-Niggas who are in a league all their own. -Because of a better chance of reproduction, more Lanky Niggas will become prominent and natural selection will take its place. This means Big Niggas will die off and Lanky Niggas will rise. Your move.
Big Nigga is no more, Lanky Nigga is where it's at

Big Niggas are obsolete; overruled by the Lanky Niggas in racial superiority. This is true in many ways. Big Niggas are simply to big, you know? They are limited in their physical ability. This is not the case with a Lanky Nigga, who can run at speeds similar to that of an electric scooter and jump at least 4 lil'uns stacked on top of one another. Big Niggas are also limited in their mental ability due to their excess body fat. With all their fat, they can't even think about education. All they think is, "gotdam what am I gon' eat next?". Lastly, lanky Niggas are just cool in general. They can dance better, move better, and BE better. It is no question. Lanky Niggas are just better in every way. So long Big Niggas!!
In conversation with...

I would start by questioning why you are trying to bond with older women? Let's look at this from a logical perspective. Your grandmother is from a bygone era and in no way represents the typical female of the modern day, with this in mind, getting to know her is not an insight into women. The same rule somewhat applies to your aunt. If they're being b*tches you need to leave them alone. Older women are in a phase known as 'post-menopausal' which basically means their hormones are messed up. These women don't think like normal women, rationality is not something they're able to utilize, not when their emotional instability is running rampant. You've asked if women need to be disrespected, the short answer is not all, but some of them do. If a b*itch is being disrespectful, then she needs to be disrespected. It's as simple as that. The issue with women is their emotional irrationality, you've mentioned it yourself. Regardless of how intelligent women may be, it matters not if they allow their emotions to dictate their decisions. This is why women are problematic in positions of power, not all, but most.
In conversation with...

Alright then well demonstrate/explain how you'd want men to treat women. Honestly I'm at a crossroads when it comes to women, trying to have a discussion with one is like talking to a god damn brick wall. When we tell them the truth, they cry and turn it into something massive for reason. Or they'll argue and bring up irrelevant sh1t from the past. Il give you quick anecdote. Just earlier today i was cooking food, telling my aunt 'did you know the one block of cheese is equivalent to 2 days of fat', allsofa sudden she started having a go at me saying i can't cook properly, n that i never listen to her.' Da Fuq??! how irrelevant. Anyways, considering my mother emotionally neglected me, and considering i lack a strong father figure, i have always been socially afraid of women. Through in the porn addiction n depression to deal with it, its safe to say I'm no man's man. I've literally wasted my life trying to bond with my gran and aunts, they're so stuck up and hypocritical, they don't want/let the men in the house do anything, then shout at us for doing nothing! When we do do stuff, they get in our way. Bullsh1t, don't understand women at all LOOOOOL. Also someone in the comments, can you correct me if I'm wrong but do women like to be disrespected? . The less we talk to you, the more helpful you are, conversely the more we help, the more barriers you put up, its madness. Why such madness........
In conversation with...

Feminism has gone too far I agree with you. We have issues as you say where a board of directors must include at least 2 women, this means a less qualified woman may get a placement instead of a better qualified male. This is hypocritical to what is trying to be achieved as favoring a woman just for being a women is sexist towards men. It's sexist to all, suggesting that women need representatives, in turn further dividing the sexes. Women represent themselves quite well by being simply women. Women with extreme feminist ideologies in positions of power such as that of a board of directors, is harmful to men and women. These extreme feminists will push ideas such as women in combat roles, which will put the women in danger by breaking down their 'fragile' bodies as you put it and increasing the burden of male combatants who may have to look after fatigued or easily injured female soldiers. The logic for these decisions is, "equality" and takes no considerations to the practical implications that may result of having pushed such an idea. Any arguments against the proposed idea will be labeled as misogynistic and anti-woman. The pay gap mythos You bought up women getting payed less than men, as proven by a statistic, but do you understand this feminist propaganda? It's true, but taken out of context, so let me explain. Women do not literally get payed less per hour for the same job. The statistic is an average taken across EVERY man and women, it shows that men typically earn more because they have better jobs, not because they get payed more for doing the same job, that would be illegal and every company would hire women to save costs.This blatant bending of the truth is clear cut proof of how potentially dangerous this feminist, anti-male campaigning is. We cannot prevent this anti-male hate from occurring by being reasonable, the Jews during the era of Nazi Germany were reasonable and look at where that got them. By using the male testosterone driven fury that has bought man-kind into the modern era we must fight this fanny driven suppression and dominate as our ancestors once did. Rather than living a soft, penis tucked between legs life that we are currently living. Stand up to the mouthy cows and show them that equality is not so comfortable, not when I'll hit a bi*ch who thinks she's a man. No sir.