Noahs flood happened

"Points on posted video- Turkey never "officially recognized" Noahs Ark, that is simply a falsehood. There is now no acknowledgement from ANY official body that any supposed find on Mt Ararat was the ark, and all so called evidence has been thoroughly debunked" your words My response The Turkish government did acknowledge it Turgut "zal the Turkish prime minister at the time was right there in the video right next to Ron Wyatt in the video theres even a visitors centre next to the ark site that the Turkish government built also "how and who debunked it"? This a quote from Answers in Genesis- A creationist, apologetic site, regarding Ron Wyatt (your words) My response Just because another creationist disagreed with it doesn't make it true not every creationist is going to agree with on every topic you have to consider their arguments with everyone elses e.g are their arguments consistent with the situation can it be debunked also if they said this where is the link to this post? (Your words) Are the claims true? If they are, such a staggeringly impressive list would mean that Ron Wyatt had been almost as miraculously assisted by God as the patriarch Moses. If, however, a careful examination of just one or two of these claims reveals them to be false, fanciful or fraudulent, the "divine leading" option evaporates, and it is clear that Christians are being seriously misled.[1] My response But wouldn't if they aren't what would be your response (Your Words) Pro can "think" all he wants, but simple math shows that a population of six people, even if they bred at the maximum rate, as did their progeny, could not account for a fraction of the known world population in the years when know events (such as the building of the pyramids) occurred. My response Actually 8 people also do the 'simple math' and show me that I'm wrong ( Your words) His claim is that "civilization occurred after the flood". That is a curious claim, as there is at least a thousand years of civilization recorded IN THE BIBLE previous to the flood. My response Well restarted because everything had been previously destroyed, I don't remember saying there was no civilisation before the flood (Your words) Pro puts the flood at around 4000BC. My response 4400BC Actually so that completely negates that argument btw I never said 4000 years. (You said) Pros contention is that all these civilizations were wiped out, then within a very small space of time, Noah s descendants ( having acquired the physical characteristics of the people who had previously inhabited those regions- paintings and statues of Chinese people from long before that period look- Chinese. Curious that Noahs descendants so quickly took ion those same characteristics), that they took up exactly the same culture as had been destroyed, and that no record or break in culture was noted. My response I never said that people started to speak different languages and gain different characteristics at the Tower of babel but also if you have an explanation for how there are so many different characteristics and languages I would like to hear it. (You said) Pro states we should respect the authority of the bible- the flood myth is perhaps the most stark example of why the bible fails in any way as a record of truth, as it clearly didn't happen My response I never said we should respect the authority of the bible and you claim it clearly never happened but yet there are so many fossils and petrified animals and trees all over the world in the most peculiar places for example petrified clams on top of mt everest http://practicalapologetics.blogspot.com... https://answersingenesis.org... (You said) Even as a allegory, it is an awful story of a tyrant commuting genocide out of rage- hardly an example to be emulated or worshiped. My response Yes he killed many people as do soldiers and executioners in USA but its the reasoning behind it and who they're doing it to the bible says Genesis 6:5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. God destroyed a planet full of wickedness and as a side note I've observed nowadays when people do evil things alot of people say out loud they would love for them to be executed so in fairness he gave a dose of justice. (You said) A Global Flood would have left a myriad of different evidences. There would be clear Gene bottlenecks in species, a layer of unbelievable density of fossils in one thin layer, the extinction of many plant species (Noah didn't take two of every plant, did he?)- non of which exist. My response The fact that the fossils are layered speaks volumes itself for example when water is flowing through mud it automatically sets it into layers you can see this for yourself by getting a jar filling it with some dirt and some water shaking it up and you can see it automatically sets into layers its called stratification just because we can have bottle-neck genes doesn't mean animals also do. Thank you for your response this round was so much fun I look forward to your next argument.