9/11 was an inside job: new perspective.

1.Debris from the wtc did cause large amounts of damage.1. clear out any debris(it would fly out due to explosives and cause large amounts of damage.)The first step is to clear out debris; by debris it likely means things like furniture, coffee mugs, computers....etc. 2.load bearing walls were horizontally ejected as shown in our last debate.2. remove NON-load bearing walls(they would stiffen the structure hindering collapse.)Load bearing walls may have been ejected but it's those that DON'T bear any load that need to be removed. -However there is evidence of nano thermite and carbon nanotubes found in the wtc dust .(1,2) Nanothermite technology was declassified after 911, its known that technology can be 20 years more advanced than what is official at the time, this is due to national security we would not want our enemies to copy our technology.These advanced explosives methods are not used by controlled demolition companies who still use archaic and cheap methods they have to remove walls etc to wire up the explosives. Nano-thermite alone doesn't mean anything for the controlled demolition theory because a thermitic reaction is not controlled enough to cut the steel columns at precise enough angles for controlled demolition."The Linear Thermite Charge (LTC) is designed to rapidly cut through concrete and steel structural components by using extremely high temperature thermite reactions jetted through a linear nozzle. "If these were used someone would'be seen them being attatched to the steel columns. Also Linear Thermite Charges were not invented by the government; if you read the patent information you'll see it was invented by people not connected to the government, AND the patent was granted in 2006; 5 years to late.-"While examining the tenants in each critical area, we should ask — Cui Bono? That is, who benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings, and the resulting War on Terror? The obvious answer includes, primarily, the Bush Administration and its friends. It also includes overlapping groups of oil and gas companies, defense contractors, and those who desired to wield undue influence on international policies related to a wide number of issues from civil rights to space domination."The crux of the Controlled demolition theory is that NIST faked the report and then you say that it's the Bush administration who would have benefitted. Well the Bush administration also wanted evidence against global warming but NIST wouldn't falsify anything so there is no reason to assume that they would have falsified the 9/11 reports.-"If we look at the companies that occupied the impact zones of the WTC towers, and other floors that might have played a useful role in the demolition of the towers, we see connections to organizations that had access to explosive materials, and to the expertise required to use explosives"Where's the evidence? and not from one of those 9/11truth; none of the source links go to the peer revied study; rather they go to another 9/11 conspiracy site that has it but with no source.-"Several facts are clear from this review of the companies and people responsible for revamping the security systems for the WTC buildings, and securing New York City, on 9/11. One is that many of the people involved were deceptive and/or corrupt, and appeared to have benefited from the attacks. Another is that many of them were connected to each other and to the investigations into previous acts of terrorism and the terrorist financing bank BCCI. Yet another striking similarity among these organizations is that they all did major work for the Saudi Arabian government, or the royal family of Kuwait. Finally, the history of some of those involved, like Terry McAuliffe, shows a level of greed and corruption that overshadowed all preconceptions about US politics."See above.The planes ?The planes did not come from a flight school, but from airports- united airlines , american airlines planes were hijacked.Well if the planes were remote controlled the airports certainly would've noticed no one was inside, and remember they couldn't take control of the planes; that means that the technology that allowed the airports to take remote control must have been either removed or damaged.The confession was likely due to torture (waterboarding ) They were brought before a grand jury in accordance with US law; they couldn't have been tortured.The flight school however said that the terrorists could barely fly a cesna but somehow mananged to do extreme manuevors in a jet plane something that professional pilots fail to do in flight simulators , even though they have tried many times .They probably intentionally failed; also if professional pilots couldn't due those maneuvors then ther's no way it could be done with remote control as you say.Operation home run is a system in which hijacked planes can be re hijacked via remote control .They could've damaged the system that allows Operation home run.Only a computer could have handled the planes like they did anyone in the plane would be helpless to reclaim control manually.Not necessarily.NOTE TO PRO: the sources you have used are known conspiracy theory sites, please try using more reliable sources.