God is guilty of collusion to sacrifice a child in the case of Jepthah

"1) My opponent seeks to show how "what Yahweh would do if he didn't agree to a sacrifice" and proceeds to use the instance of Abraham and Isaac as an example of how Yahweh would act. However, the situations are not analogous. In the case of Abraham God was the initiator of the sacrifice, and since he later stopped it it is likely that he never intended for the sacrifice to take place at all. Regardless, it is not an equivalent circumstance. Rather, we see people committing child sacrifices throughout the Bible, and Yahweh allows people to exercise their free will to do so."The first thing that strikes me is the free will excuse, so Yahweh in one case, where it is convenient for my opponent violates free will in the situation of delivering to the judges, but in the other case where it is convenient he wants it to be an excuse, to say the least that is interesting picking and choosing. I stand by my argument that there is a a past precident set by Yahweh on how he will deal with child sacrifices he is involved in a deal with, if he doesn't want that to happen."2) My opponent seeks to show that the sacrifice in the New Testament of Jesus Christ proves that Yahweh is not opposed to human sacrifice. However, Christian doctrine teaches that the Son was pre-existent and willingly sacrificed himself. This situation is also not analogous."Again an example of Yahweh, being in on a sacrifice, the situations do not need to match to show that in general Yahweh does not have issues with sacrifice and if we actually look at the testimony the girl actually appears to be willing to be sacrificed as she says: "My father, if you have given your word to the LORD, do to me according to what has gone out of your mouth, because the LORD has avenged you of your enemies, the people of Ammon" So shall we say I am bewilderment at how being willingly sacrificed makes this different. "3) My opponent seeks to argue that Yahweh accepted the "deal" that Jepthah suggested. However this does not present itself in the text. Yahweh is markedly silent on the topic. In addition, the fact that the Spirit of the LORD was already with Jepthah prior to his vow is significant. Every other place in the book of Judges that the Spirit of the LORD is with a judge, that judge has already been comissioned to defeat the enemies of Israel. Paradigmatically, it appears as though the LORD already intended to defeat the enemies of Israel and Jepthah made an uneccesary vow. Furthermore, there is no evidence present in the text that indicates that he LORD was pleased by the sacrifice or would have been displeased by it. If I say to a person "If you say nothing I will take it to mean that you hate me" and the person says nothing, it does not mean they hate me. It simply means they are not responding to me for some reason."Here is what the verse says:"Then the Spirit of the LORD came upon Jephthah" so it is clear the lord was there at least before the deal. So now we need to know what our witness, Jephthah has to say about this: “Alas, my daughter! You have brought me very low! You are among those who trouble me! For I have given my word to the LORD, and I cannot go back on it.”So, if the lord was not there, our only witness to this seems to be completely unaware of the fact he left. If he didn't think the lord was with him on this deal it seems he would not have done this as he creates a progession of since I gave my word to the lord, I must do as I said. This signifies that he believed the lord was involved in the deal. "4) My opponent makes a comparison to prostitution. However, this again is an unfaircomparison. If it is consistent with my established behavior to give a given type of person money, that person then has sex with me and I give them money it does not logically follow that the money was for sex. This is a hasty generalization based on partial evidence. Perhaps I owed the hooker money for something else. There are many ways that the scenario presented does not equate to a person paying for sex."My opponent in this example is realing stretching here. I am not sure if he read the entire example, in my example the John lets the prostitute have sex, symbolizing the acceptance of the terms. Also once a John transfers money to a cop who has offered sex in a deal or if a John offers to pay a undercover cop for sex without being solicitated they will be arrested. The same holds true, once Yahweh delivers his end of the deal he is accountable for the Sacrifice. This is common sense.5 I really don't feel a need to go into right now,"6) Finally, my opponent appeals to the so-called problem of evil to show that Yahweh was obligated to stop this tragedy. He implies that if Yahweh did not stop the sacrifice he either could not stop it or did not desire to stop it. There are other alternatives. Perhaps the sacrifice served a greater purpose, perhaps Yahweh favors allowing free will over stoping sin. Regardless of the reason, it does not prove collusion, it simply proves that Yahweh had a reason not to stop it."Once it is clear that Yahweh accepted the terms and knew about the terms, which all of our evidence suggests, in any legal circumstance he is obligated to stop it. The problem of evil is another debate, but you would really have to jump through hoops to lower your morality and humanity to the point of nothing to believe it is right to sacrifice a virgin girl. So now that I have addressed those problems lets further look at the character of Good Ole Yah', he has a proven track record of violence and crime. 2 Kings 2:24 And he turned around, and when he saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. And two she-bears came out of the woods and tore forty-two of the boyshas god sending she bear to kill 42 boys, using the ESV version since my opponent thinks its accurate. Genesis 19:26 But Lot’s wife, behind him, looked back, and she became a pillar of saltYahweh turns a woman into a pillar of salt after she looks back. This is more interesting considering her crime was looking back at the town she has always lived in. Lot is allowed to live, after offering his own daughters up for rape, to save 2 strangers, who may or may not have been angels. Throughout the bible god kills 2.5 million people numbered and an estimated 25 million when you factor in the unnumbered people. Including many children, imagine how many new borns would have been killed in the flood. Precision weaponry Yahweh is not. A being of that character, with our witness seeming to think he knew, and the book telling us he delivered the people which was his part of the deal, seems like my opponent needs to come up with something a little better here.