Christianity is akin to Fascism

This round I shall be proving that Totalitarian Communism is NOT akin to Fascism and then show how Facism is not akin to Christianity. Totalitarian Communism vs. Fascism If we view the lovely picture above we can view a ton of the key differences between Communism and Facism. We can see that Communism is a classless soceity while Fascism has a multitude of classes. In Communism there is 1 Supreme Leader, while in Fascism there is only dedication to the country. The goal in fascism is the spread of Nationalism compared to the spread fo the communism. Here we can already see that these things are not akin, but as my opponent has stated, if these things are both related to Christianity then they are also related to each other. My next argument will be on the bases of comparing these two things. "Now the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and one soul; neither did anyone say that any of the things he possessed was his own, but they had all things in common. And with great power the apostles gave witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And great grace was upon them all. Nor was there anyone among them who lacked; for all who were possessors of lands or houses soldthem, and brought the proceeds of the things that were sold, and laid them at the apostles’ feet; and they distributed to each as anyone had need. " (Acts 4:32-35)“The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine. For you are strangers and sojourners with me. " Lev 25:23One of the key things in Communism vs. Fascism was that of Communism having the abolition of property and redistrabution to form a classesless society. We can see here in this verse that Jesus called for work as hard as they could, but they would be paid according to their need, again an aspect of communism, and this in itself reveals that this redistrubution would create a classless soceity. Many can see that in every communist nation and welfare state around the world that this is what occurs. The problem with this type of government is that it eventually runs out of other people's money and they live in collective poverty. Chrsosdom condemned the issue of wealth and greed that it lead to Christians being unable to run banks due to usuery being sinful. [1] This lead to the Jewish population taking that role and lead to a slippery slope of stereotypes. Now let's move on to property. What do the Fascists say when it comes to property? The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property. (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27)- Adolf Hitler [2]"Under fascism, citizens retain the responsibilities of owning property, without freedom to act and without any of the advantages of ownership. "- Ayn Rand, The Fascist Fronteir page 98. Here we can see that under Fascism the people are permitted to continue to own property. Hitler shows that the only difference with Ayn Rand is that they can use Eminent Domain and seized the propert for public projects, but STILL people are permitted and entitled to own Private Property. This already highlights the second major difference now which is also supported by the Bible, because if we observe the Leviticus verse we can see that there is to be no Private Property. Sources1. (. http://www.csmonitor.com...) 2. Barkai, Avraham. Nazi Economics: Ideology, Theory, and Policy. Trans. Ruth Hadass-Vashitz. Oxford: Berg Publishers Ltd. , 1990.