BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Rap Battle Caker man vs masterful quality>quantity.

I was chillin' in this alley down in the Cali valleyThis dude prolly' on some LSD walks down the street screamin' sayin' "NOBODY LOVES ME"he's an attendent to the Gay Pride parade but I could tell there would be trouble when he walked down the alleywayI was loadin' up getting ready to spit in his face and tell him to go away but it became immediately clear that his mental state was in disarray.He walks up to this homeless crackhead and initiates foreplayhe asked if he was me and then starts rhyming like his words were flyin' down the freewaybut then the old crackhead does his best to get up and flushes him away like a tidal wave"masterful is what they call you on the internet but you can't stop me from getting your sisters panties wet, you get swept and then you get slept, it's what happens when you talk s-it but you don't seem to get the concept"masturful was being slapped around pretty good, he was being set ablaze like a pile of fire woodI couldn't believe what I was seeing, a top 10 DDO rapper, defiled by a crack fiendthe situation got worse when he wouldn't heedthe old dudes warningsand tried to rap with a little speedbut then he started transforming, and the clear weather turned to stormingthe crackhead wasn't happy because masturful was being pretty boringbut it was at this time he looked around, I was hiding right around the corner because my damn ears started to bleedThe situation got weird and I started to see that the homeless man was tryna peeon masturfuls legmasturfal smacked him in a coma and said"I'm gonna lie about you to everyone on the net"and hence we are here, biting on his ear like mike tyson, insincerespittin' mad raps noone can understand, like an auctioneerbut there's one goal I set out to achieve and that is striking fearinto the hearts of my opponents, bringing upon the final frontieri'm flying sky high like Santa's reindeer* All Raps Seen Above Are Ad-Libbed *
Rap Battle Caker man vs masterful quality>quantity.

Two part rap with this being the introduction. I'm walking down a back ally where I see a mad man smoking crack, I ask him what he's doing, he says "stroking mi sack." He's a vile old coot only wearing one boot and the idea of a shower doesn't seem to compute. It's sad to see and old man with a broken knee, crawling around like an amputee, talking trash while so low to the ground, has a dirt moustache and bums around. I said "wait a minute, caker man is that you?" He said "ye but mi crack man now n I'm a Jew." I gave him a dollar then I got up and went, he found that offensive and began an argument. He yelled "just cus I'm a bum doesn't mean I need your cash, sure, I live in a slum and got a dick rash, but things are going well, despite the bad smell cus I've got a sh*t ton of crack to smoke n sell." He began spitting rhymes and spat out his teeth, farted, sharted and then pushed out a queef. "I Might be old but I feel young, it's kinda cold but I'm real hung, You won't believe the size of my genitalia, I'm a real endowed proud Mammalia, you wouldd think I come from Somalia, my nicknames penetarlia" I listened with intrigue, but then he started to fatigue at that moment I knew he was out of his league. He suddenly shat himself silly, pants fell down, I saw his willy. The mans got one hope, no hope, does nothing but dangle dope, penis can't even be seen under a micro-scope. It was pathetic, the herpes on his nob was an ugly aesthetic, but the tattoo on his bum was kinda poetic. I grabbed his head and kneed him in the face, I stabbed him dead and made him bleed in place. I began to heave a shite onto his corpse, It felt kinda right but at the same time awks As I smeared it into his old dead cheek, It appeared as though his head started to speak, "I'm dying, the thought of not hearing you rap is terrifying, gift my ears and lift my tears that would be exemplifying" To be continued in the next episode of Masterful vs Cakerman!
Rap Battle Caker man vs masterful quality>quantity.

I said I was comin' for your neck, but now that you've stepped up i'mma bounce your head off the deckrhymes comin' cold like we were battling in Quebec better be barring a miracle or you'll losethis is verbal sparring but if you want i'll lace up the old boxing shoesrecent family tragedy will have you feelin' blueso pick the pace up, before I tear you down like those Confederate statuesi'm goin' to war with you like my name was Shaka Zuluyou claim to be real but I can see right through youcookin' you up like a 4th of July barbecuewe just made a breakthrough, words stickin' to you like a tattooso go back to the drive-thru dollar menu and leave selling out 100,000 crowd venues to me
Should College Football Have A Playoff System

ok the con is obviously not a true college football fan if he doesn't want to see a play off system. If you want to be the best in college football you can't have off days and make turnovers that means your not the best. It's not like you would let all the teams in the NCAA in just the top 8 or 10 and that's what makes it exciting knowing that this game is win or go home. In all sporting competitions there all winners and losers and if you "exceed expectations" well good for you but you still lost. And there was absolutely no reason for the Con to start talking about economic competition that was just to fill up characters to make it look like he knows what he is talking about. The con has given you no reason to vote negative except that he doesn't want it. I have given you my view and even the view of our new President the people want it and it should happen even if just one single person doesn't want it. So you must vote for my plan to get a play off system.
Should College Football Have A Playoff System

I have little desire to see a true or even semi-authentic playoff system for college football. Why does there have to be an unambiguous single national champion? It would take way too long to do a proper elimination tournament as in basketball. And tournaments can have quirks just as easily as a decentralized bowl system, with a superior team having on off day or an inferior team getting a lot of turnovers or whatever and winning a game it would lose eight times out of ten. With a bunch of bowls, a lot of teams get to revel in postseason success. Perhaps not incidentally, having a bunch of bowls -- unlikely to change because so many commercial interests are involved -- makes the college football post-season a bit more like economic competition than athletic competition. Confusion between the two is endemic. In athletics competition leads to a clear winner and a clear loser. In economic competition you don't have to have the most market share -- or whatever definition makes you Number One -- to be successful. You just have to have more revenues than expenses (or even just realistic prospects of being there next year), and the Number Seven market-share company might have the highest profit margin. It's nice to have numerous paths to success rather than a pyramid-type tourney in which only one team is the winner and the rest, no matter how much they improved or exceeded expectations, are viewed as losers
Should College Football Have A Playoff System

College Football should most definitely have a play ff system because it is the only fair way to give each team a fair chance to be crowned the best in college football. The bcs is a completely biased system and should be thrown out in its entirety. You can't just give two teams a chance at the championship and for those teams to be chosen by other coaches. So a play off system is the obvious way to go and as time has passed more and more people have been in favor of enacting a play off system. Why even our new president the honorable Barack Obama wants a playoff system as quoted in the WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama says he still thinks there needs to be a playoff system for determining the country's college football champion. Obama, asked what he thought about Florida's 24-14 victory Thursday night over Oklahoma in the BCS championship game, congratulated the Gators and said he'd sent a message to a friend whose son plays for the team. At the same time, he said, "If I'm Utah, or if I'm USC or if I'm Texas, I might still have some quibbles." Obama said, "That's why we need a playoff."
evolution is not a theory, It is an unconfirmed hypothesis

Fossil Record: Obviously, The counter argument is that, Of course, Transitional fossils have been found. They are consistent with what we'd expect if macro-evolution did occur. Take Archaeopteryx or Tiktaalik as examples. Archaeopteryx clearly shows an early link between dinosaurs and birds. Tiktaalik has many features of both fish and tetrapods. They are not at all "questionable". Structural Homology: Needs a better source. None of the sources you have provided are primary peer-reviewed sources. And pending the truth of the statement " the apparent homologous structures in different species are specified by quite different genes", Structural Homology seems like a fairly good argument in favour of macro evolution. Why else would a whale have vestigial bones that are analogous to land-based mammal bones Molecular Biology: The counter argument here is that simple does not mean similar. The idea that bacteria and yeast are closely related because they are simple is false. This is because even though such organisms are simple, Doesn't mean they don't also evolve over time and differentiate themselves from other species. The most obvious piece of evidence for this is that only bacteria have prokaryotic cells. Other living organisms have eukaryotic cells. This is a fundamental schism between living organisms and explains why yeast and horses, Having eukaryotic cells are more closely related than yeast and bacteria and is represented as such in the data provided. Mutualism: Apart from this point being a fallacious argument from improbability, It's also a misunderstanding of evolution. Different characteristics do not randomly pop out for no reason. Organism populations are pressured to evolve purely based on what best allows for them to survive better and this process occurs over tremendously long periods of time. In this particular example, It's not a matter of either fish species having to suddenly develop specific behaviours. Only that, Over time, Individuals (of either species) that engaged in either behaviour tended to live longer and hence had a greater chance to pass on characteristics that favoured such behaviours. The same can be applied to the development of the teeth. As an added note, This is an example of micro-evolution, Not macro-evolution, So I'd also question its relevance given the focus of the initial points.
Islam is evil

Uh, yeah, besides, even if only 200,000 Muslims are with ISIS, the vast majority of others beat their wives and genital mutilate their kids, sounds like they are terrorists to me, to their wives that is, so even if a small fraction of Muslims are in a terrorist group, almost all Muslims are terrorists, it's just that these guys are too cowards to face some big tough guy like the U.S., so they go after people they know will not be able to defend themselves, their wives, that doesn't make them any less of scum, if anything it makes them more of scum. Well, not only is your statement untrue but it is clear that you have interpreted the Qur'an arbitrarily. Also, your statement is extremely racist. Numbers also show that 90% of the terrorist attacks are actually done by non-muslim terrorists. 50% of that 90% is actually done by the big tough guys you were talking about. There have been over 3 million domestic violence attacks in the US. Not even 1% of those were done by Muslims. As for the verses, read this verse: Quran 5:82 You will surely find the most intense of the people in animosity toward the believers [to be] the Jews and those who associate others with Allah ; and you will find the nearest of them in affection to the believers those who say, "We are Christians." That is because among them are priests and monks and because they are not arrogant. Clearly, you have a lot of reading to do.
Islam is evil

Uh, yeah, besides, even if only 200,000 Muslims are with ISIS, the vast majority of others beat their wives and genital mutilate their kids, sounds like they are terrorists to me, to their wives that is, so even if a small fraction of Muslims are in a terrorist group, almost all Muslims are terrorists, it's just that these guys are too cowards to face some big tough guy like the U.S., so they go after people they know will not be able to defend themselves, their wives, that doesn't make them any less of scum, if anything it makes them more of scum. In these verses, Islam openly advocates for terrorism; 3:151 "We will cast into the hearts of the unbeliever"s terror, for that they have associated with Allah that for which He sent down never authority; their lodging shall be the Fire; evil is the lodging of the evildoers." 8:12 "When Allah was revealing to the angels, "I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers hearts terror; so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them!"" 8:39 "Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah"s entirely; then if they give over, surely Allah sees the things they do."
Islam is evil

What, ISIS is Muslims, they follow the Qur'an to the "T", and Jesus was not a "mythical being" no one is doubting either that Mohammed and Allah existed, but Mohammed was not a prophet, and "Allah" was not go, "Allah" was Satan, ad still is, and Mohammed was an Antichrist, the Qur'an explicitly orders Muslims to genital mutilate their kids, kill non-Muslims, own sex slaves, beat their wives, rape animals, rape babies, and much more ungodliness. It is very apparent that my opponent has very limited knowledge on this topic. I am also aware that my opponent believes that ISIS is just following the Qur'an. Well, there are 1.6 billion muslims in this world right now. That is about 23% of the population. There are 200,000 ISIS fighters in society. So if what you are saying is true, the number of people who are "following the Qur'an to the T" is 0.0125% of the Muslim population. Wait a minute. If "Allah" was Satan, and still is, and Mohammed was an Antichrist, the Qur'an explicitly orders Muslims to genital mutilate their kids, kill non-Muslims, own sex slaves, beat their wives, rape animals, rape babies, and much more ungodliness, then, only 0.0125% of the supposedly Muslim population is actually Muslim. So what you are saying is, 0.0125% which is a tiny minority of the Muslim population are true followers. Well, if you looked at the rest of the Muslim population, which is 99.9875%, they seem to be perfectly normal people. So are they not following the Qur'an? Well, maybe the Qur'an isn't actually evil like you say it is, but statistics show that Muslims aren't all evil.
Islam is evil

"There is a big difference, Jesus never condoned any of this? Your argument is that Jesus, a mythical being which we don't even know that existed, never condoned any of this? How do we know this? There's no proof that anything written in the bible or The Qur'an is true. Therefore, what are we debating about? Mythical beings? Imaginary stories? Why don't we talk about the people who follow these religions instead, because as far as I know, Muslims aren't pedophiles or terrorists. They are just regular people who choose to believe in a god just like you choose to believe in the " True God. As for Isis, they aren't real muslims. They are just plain old douchebags." What, ISIS is Muslims, they follow the Qur'an to the "T", and Jesus was not a "mythical being" no one is doubting either that Mohammed and Allah existed, but Mohammed was not a prophet, and "Allah" was not go, "Allah" was Satan, ad still is, and Mohammed was an Antichrist, the Qur'an explicitly orders Muslims to genital mutilate their kids, kill non-Muslims, own sex slaves, beat their wives, rape animals, rape babies, and much more ungodliness.
Islam is evil

Well, if your views on this topic is biased, how can we trust anything you say? There is a big difference, Jesus never condoned any of this? Your argument is that Jesus, a mythical being which we don't even know that existed, never condoned any of this? How do we know this? There's no proof that anything written in the bible or The Qur'an is true. Therefore, what are we debating about? Mythical beings? Imaginary stories? Why don't we talk about the people who follow these religions instead, because as far as I know, Muslims aren't pedophiles or terrorists. They are just regular people who choose to believe in a god just like you choose to believe in the " True God. As for Isis, they aren't real muslims. They are just plain old douchebags.
Islam is evil

"You referring to the Christian God as the "TRUE GOD" clearly shows how biased your views are on this topic." It is. "If Islam is evil, then is Christianity evil as well? Well, Henry Charles Lea records: Two hundred wretches crowded the filthy gaol and it was requisite to forbid the rest of the Conversos [Jews intimidated into converting to Christianity] from leaving the city [Jaen, Spain] without a license. With Diego"s assistance [Diego de Algeciras, a petty criminal and kept perjurer] and the free use of torture, on both accused and witnesses, it was not difficult to obtain whatever evidence was desired. The notary of the tribunal, Antonio de Barcena, was especially successful in this. On one occasion, he locked a young girl of fifteen in a room, stripped her naked and scourged her until she consented to bear testimony against her mother. A prisoner was carried in a chair to the auto da fe with his feet burnt to the bone; he and his wife were burnt alive . . . The cells in which the unfortunates were confined in heavy chains were narrow, dark, humid, filthy and overrun with vermin, while their sequestrated property was squandered by the officials, so that they nearly starved in prison while their helpless children starved outside." There is a big difference, Jesus never condoned any of this, in fact he openly denounced such deeds, whereas Mohamed did not only condone this, but did it himself. On the other hand, Islam did not impose itself by the sword. In a statement in which the Arabic is extremely emphatic, the Koran insists, "There must be no coercion in matters of faith!" (2: 256). Constantly Muslims are enjoined to respect Jews and Christians, the "People of the Book," who worship the same God (29: 46). In words quoted by Muhammad in one of his last public sermons, God tells all human beings, "O people! We have formed you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another" (49: 13)--not to conquer, convert, subjugate, revile or slaughter but to reach out toward others with intelligence and understanding. "If Muslims are evil, then maybe all religions are." No.
Islam is evil

You referring to the Christian God as the "TRUE GOD" clearly shows how biased your views are on this topic. If Islam is evil, then is Christianity evil as well? Well, Henry Charles Lea records: Two hundred wretches crowded the filthy gaol and it was requisite to forbid the rest of the Conversos [Jews intimidated into converting to Christianity] from leaving the city [Jaen, Spain] without a license. With Diego"s assistance [Diego de Algeciras, a petty criminal and kept perjurer] and the free use of torture, on both accused and witnesses, it was not difficult to obtain whatever evidence was desired. The notary of the tribunal, Antonio de Barcena, was especially successful in this. On one occasion, he locked a young girl of fifteen in a room, stripped her naked and scourged her until she consented to bear testimony against her mother. A prisoner was carried in a chair to the auto da fe with his feet burnt to the bone; he and his wife were burnt alive . . . The cells in which the unfortunates were confined in heavy chains were narrow, dark, humid, filthy and overrun with vermin, while their sequestrated property was squandered by the officials, so that they nearly starved in prison while their helpless children starved outside. On the other hand, Islam did not impose itself by the sword. In a statement in which the Arabic is extremely emphatic, the Koran insists, "There must be no coercion in matters of faith!" (2: 256). Constantly Muslims are enjoined to respect Jews and Christians, the "People of the Book," who worship the same God (29: 46). In words quoted by Muhammad in one of his last public sermons, God tells all human beings, "O people! We have formed you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another" (49: 13)--not to conquer, convert, subjugate, revile or slaughter but to reach out toward others with intelligence and understanding. If Muslims are evil, then maybe all religions are.
Islam is evil

Amigo, do you know your own Unholy Qur'an? Unholy Qur'an 2:223: "Your wives are a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when and how you will." Wait, the "prophet" Mohammed saw women as tilth, dirt? What a chauvenistic pig, look at these next few verses too: Unholy Qur"an 4:34: "Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great." "Surely Allah is high, great", Not from reading your "holy book". It sounds like Allah is a worm, a little chauvinistic, pedophiliac worm, it also sounds like Allah is the father of lies, the prince of the power of the air, etc. He did get one part right though, "surely Allah is High", you bet, Allah is very high if he thinks that wife beating is OK, he must be high on some pretty funky drugs too, considering our next few verses from the Unholy Qur"an.
IVF Debate

Of course when starting with the IVF treatment extra embryos may be possible. (http://infertility.about.com...) Rachel Gurevich says if the cycle isn"t succesful then those embryos can be forzen and transferred to your next cycle. But when the cycle is successful the parents would have choices on what to do with the extra embryos. One can save the embryos for another future transfer or you can donate the extra embryos to a different couple. Donating to a fertility clinic can be either open donation, maintaining contact, or a close donation, with no contact with the family. Donate the embryo to science would mean that the embryos will not become babies or children, they will be used to gain the knowledge of giving someone else a better chance at life. One can Thaw and Dispose the Embryos, or decide to keep the embryos frozen at a clinic. Disposing the Embryos will mean thawing them and discarding them as biowaste. There are many ways to deal with the production of excess embryos. The hardest part is choosing which way to deal with it.
IVF Debate

From the article "What happens to extra embryos after IVF" from http://www.cnn.com...; I discovered that excess embryos can either be disposed of, stored or donated. The majority of couples that practice IVF end up storing embryos, for various reasons. From a survey conducted 72% of couples who had stored embryos were unsure of what they were planning to do with the in the future. Within this survey there were some couples that stored their embryos just because they couldn't stand disposing of them. The rest of the couple planned to have them implanted in the future and others chose to donate them. The problems surrounding this is that couples are typically fertilized more embryos than will be implanted so there are always some left over. Couples everywhere face the choice of having to pay for the storage of their embryos every month or otherwise having to donate them or disposing of them. So the ethical problem is raised of whether not having the money to support unused embryos is reason enough for disposing of them or if donating them would be the better option. This also brings huge emotional stress on couples as they have to decide what to do with their extra embryos.