Steady State Theory VS Big Bang

I Thank Subtai for accepting this debate and would like to take this round to introduce you all to the Steady State Model, the theory itself, and the theological and metaphysical support for this argument.What is The Steady state Theory?The first and most stark contrasts from other models(like the Big Bang) is the assertion that the universe is indeed infinite in both the realms of space and time.The original model proposed by Cosmologists Fred Hoyle and Bondi states that the universe is expanding(constantly and indefinitely) causes the emergence of creation fields which create new matter. The thought was as the universe was indeed expanding and these creation fields would spring up as a result of this expansion and lead to the universe never changing its form. However as astronomical observations have caught up with theoretical cosmology the original theory needed to be reformed. This leads to the contemporary form of Steady State known as Quasi-Steady State(QSS) Now For The Actual TheoryThe Universe is infinite however it is not static. The Universe goes through an endless cycle of contractions and expansions. We can observe that we are currently in a period of expansion from the observations of Hubble and many others indicated by the further a galaxy is away, the faster they are moving away(AKA Red Shift). The (QSS) History of our universe was no great single cataclysmic event but an eternal cycle of creation events. These Creation Events are sometimes referred to as mini-bangs. These “minibangs” occur from situations of high velocity particles(perhaps Planck Particles) in relation to extreme gravitational fields. This results in the pouring in of matter to the universe. Whether or not matter is simply created by these events or has an origin different in space time is unfortunately still speculative. However unlike Big Bang in which the universal creation arose Ex Nihilo these creation events occur for a set of universal physical laws that have always been so and always will. What you are looking at here is two very distant galaxies going through what very well may be a creation event. We observe an elliptical galaxy which has very high radio emission fire a jet which is directly inline with another galaxy. One could come to the conclusion the conditions here for a QSS creation process are very high as we have strong gravitational and radio forces followed by a jet of of matter and the creation of another. Professor Hoyle cites this very same piece of evidence and comes to the same conclusion. galaxy.http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu...http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu...Back to the cyclical nature of the Universe. If you notice in the diagram below we can see that the universe is subject to an endless balance of heightened creation then expansion over time. The rate of creation decreases as we move forward in time. This would explain why we do not observe creation events in regions closer to our galaxy(and thus closes to our own time) rather than creation events like we will find far-far away and long ago in time. This decrease in creation would logically lead to an eventual deterioration of the universe. We can note that stars further away are actually predominantly younger, this is an indicator that the QSS cosmological model of the universe as shown below is factual. The reason for this being as we move back in time we see more creation and recent development(younger stars and objects) but today we have a greatly reduced level of creation and recent development. http://casswww.ucsd.edu...^^ Professor BurbidgeMetaphysical Analysis and the Planck epochAside from the scientific theory behind QSSC and even the earlier version of Steady State are metaphysical and theological arguments and reasoning:I. The Steady State Model unlike Big Bang would not require “ex nihilo nihil fit” which literally means from nothing comes nothing. For The Big Bang all of the universe came into creation from one incredibly small point. with that is the obvious question of what was the trigger? What caused this Big Bang?The Vatican and most Muslims would maintain that the creator triggered this event.However a proponent of Big Bang Stephen Hawkings maintains that the Big Bang created time as well as space. This means that there would have been no time for a creator to trigger the Big Bang. Consider that the event happened for no reason. It simply occurred at a given point for no seeable reason and this point began to exist when? Thus we are lead to the conclusion Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit that this event happened for no reason and arose from nothing. By nothing I do not mean simply the lack of matter but the very lack of matter itself. As Big Bang proponents today have not yet found an explanation or reached a consensus these questions and the existence of Ex nihilo nihil fit are very much so pressing and troublesome. However in the Steady State Model and QSSC such metaphysical problems are non-existent. As the universe is infinite in time and space and there simply is no beginning there is no creator, no trigger, no arising of something from nothing as creation of matter happens as result of universal physical forces. Universal Physical forces are still a problem for Big Bang proponents as I will explain in the last section of my argument for this round.II. The Planck Epoch The Planck Epoch is the big bang model the very early universe, this Epoch is interesting as if one read of it because of how it tells us everything we know about physics is wrong. It is stated that the universal laws of physics arose at a very high temperature. If there can indeed be a certain point where all the universal forces so familiar to physics and cosmology can be overridden then that model should seem to every man with knowledge of physics to be unsatisfactory. Much like creation events in The Steady State Theory, this period is still very much speculative as we do not have the ability yet to test the conditions required. However I argue that the very fact that the laws of nature can be disregarded at a certain time is far more troublesome.I would like to give the floor now to Subtai, he will explain his theory and then I expect we are going to have an interesting clash.