The Christian God Does Not Exist

Thanks to Truth_Seeker for accepting:). Arguments From Divine Incoherence:These arguments shall demonstrate that the Christian god doesn't exist, because the existence of such a god would result in utter incoherence.Problem Of Omnipotence:God is defined as omnipotent. Omnipotent: " (of a deity) having unlimited power; able to do anything."P1)If God exists, then God is omnipotentP2) It should be the case that there is nothing that god can't doP3) There is something that god can't doC1) God does not existsP1 is true by definition.P2 is a derivation of P1P3) Is a contentious point, that if true shall negate P2C1 necessarily follows from the premises.Defense of P3 via syllogism:P1) An omnippotent being can create an object it can't lift.P2) If an omnipotent being can create an object it can't lift, it can't lift the object, thus it isn't omnipotentP3) If it can't create an object it can't lift, then it is not omnipotent.C4) Omnipotence is impossible.The common objection is that this is a logical impossibility and god is bound by the logical absolutes. However to say god is bound, is to concede omnipotence. However it get's even worse than that. God can't even do all that is logically possible.P1) An omnipotent god can be evilP2) An Omnibenevolent god can't be evilC1) A god that is defined as omnipotent and omnibenevolent can't exist.It is not a logical impossibility to be evil. Humans are evil all the time, so it's logical possible, however god can't be. So the Theist usually says god can do that which is of god's nature. So this basically means god can do what god can do, which can be said for anyone.The Problem Of Evil(Epicurean Paradox): P1)God exists.P2)God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent.P3)An omnibenevolent god would wish to preventall evils.P4)An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence.P5)An omnipotent being has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence.P6)A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil.P7)If there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God, then no evil exists.P8)Evil exists (logical contradiction).C1)Evil and god as described by theism can not logically co-exist.The problem of evil is a very old argument and theologians have had thousands of years to address it. So what do they say? The response is usually free will. But if there's a god, there is no free will for anybody.Problem Of Free Will(Non-gods):P1)An omniscient god knows the future.P2) An omniscient god can't be wrong.P3) An omniscient god can predict your actions and can't be wrong. P4)An omniscient god knows your actions.C1) You don't have free will.So if there is a god, there is no rational way to combat the problem of evil.Problem Of Omniscience And Free-Will:P1) If god exists, he has free will and is omniscient.P2) God knows the futureP3) God knows what actions he will performP4) God can't change his future(if he did, he would have known he would, thus it was part of the original series of events.)P5) God's actions are predeterminedP6) God has no free will.C1) God does not exists.(True by virtue of omniscience)So as defined god's existence Is Incoherent.Implausability Of An External Observer:P1) God is omniscientP2) God would observe all quantum superpositionsP3) Observation collapses quantum superpositionsP4) God would collapse all quantum positions superpositionsP5) All quantum superpositions are not collapsedC1) God does not exist" Quantum superposition is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics that holds that a physical system—such as an electron—exists partly in all its particular theoretically possible states (or, configuration of its properties) simultaneously; but when measured or observed, it gives a result corresponding to only one of the possible configurations (as described in interpretation of quantum mechanics)."Conclusion: God's traits are self-contradictory and render the existence of such a being incoherent and impossible. Before Con assert's god as the reason for anything, he must demonstrate that such a being can even logically exists. My premises are self-explanatory, but if I must explain more, I will state the laws that validate my arguments (Law of non-contradiction.Law of excluded middle). In my next round I will refute Con's arguments.Sources:http://en.wikipedia.org......http://en.wikipedia.org......http://www.theopedia.com......'s_known_attributes