The validity of the Miller-Urey Theory

Starting with the formaldehyde: Formaldehyde is a building block of only ONE biologically beneficial compound, that being embalming fluid. Also, cyanide is a building block for right handed amino acids, not the left handed amino acids that basic proteins are made from. If even a single right handed amino acid comes into play with the forming protein chain, it acts like a bowling ball to pins. That is why it is still a deadly compound. Also, it proves that amino acids could form in an atmosphere that, according to the same evolutionists, probably was never there to begin with. Even then, with amino acids there, the fact remains that the Miller-Urey theory was flawed in that the chances against them forming into anything other than their predecessors are so long that even if you took all the carbon in the universe and placed it on the surface of the earth, the chances are similar to the chances that a blind man will find not 1 or 2, but 5 marked pieces of sand in the Sahara Desert without getting touched by another piece of sand. How does one overcome those chances with randomness? As for prelife, the thing that is hazardous for that is simply any molecule with the potential to react with the molecules and atoms in there. Therefore, water, sand, or anything else would have been able to react with it. as to the million years, we have NO evidence that it is even possible for that membrane to form. Heck, you haven't even explained how 70+ left amino acids come together in the right times, places, and order to form even one protein of the membrane. Then you have to describe how RNA or DNA (take your pick) could form without the protection provided by a nucleus, as any number of molecules react with DNA, which is why it has to have the nucleus, since the cytoplasm in the cell can have hazardous effects on the DNA, especially anything with hydrogen, as acids, by definition, steal hydrogens. In order to evolve, one has to produce generations. Cell membranes don't reproduce. They are just protein-formed walls with the occasional tube protein that allows transfer of certain needed materials. There isn't a protein designed to counter formaldehyde, at least not that they teach you about in cellular biology. Such an important part of a cell would be most important to learn. In fact, natural selection would have made that a main component of cellular structure, and it would have stayed on. You seem to be slowing the process down beyond the age the universe is claimed to be based on background radiation. You have RNA before you even have a membrane, even though RNA isn't even an amino acid-based compound, which makes it's formation null and void in this debate. We are talking about the amino acids and their part. A. Miller-Urey theory was good for then, when we didn't know what we now know. However, we now "know" what the probable atmosphere was, and know that the experiment is now null and void as proteins are not formed, and in fact, the formaldehyde would work on things other than building amino acids, since the other parts of amino acids are not shown in there anywhere. B. The problem is, the massive numbers of atmospheres they have tested and succeeded on are not the one currently at the forefront. In fact, the test ran on the forefront created the formaldehyde and cyanide, along with water and other non-biotic molecules, but none of the prebiotic molecules needed for amino acid production. It's like putting a builder out there without a hammer or any other tools. HE isn't going to be building a house anytime soon.