The Catholic faith has the most logical arguments of any other Christian religion

Thanks to my opponent I will be debating from the Christian Universalism viewpoint as I believe this is the closest Christian viewpoint to Atheism.(1) In fact, I would classify the Christian Universalism view as "atheism in disguise". If my opponent wants me to expand on this view, I would happily oblige in another round. However, I digress lets consider the points my opponent has introduced.I think it is important to point out that this is meant to be a logical arguments with respect to Christianity. However, where does this logic come from except for human interpretations of the Bible. For this reason, I think it is possible to use the Bible as the source of any logical argument. The problem with this, is that we will see that no one Christian interpretation fits well with the Bible but rather that some fit better than others.With respect to Purgatory, I am not sure how the idea of sin having differing degrees of severity makes sense. In fact the Bible is very clear on this fact when you look at James 2 versus 10 to 11 which says "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law."(2) From this verse we can see that no matter what the law transgressed you are guilty of all. In fact it carries on to equate murder with adultery, however in modern society we would not accept these two crimes as equal. The concept of subjective morality in modern society is what the argument for purgatory is related too, however this is not in line with the scripture.(3) The concept of Universal Salvation as defined by Christian Universalism is more in line with the Bible, as it says that everyone will be united with God after death.(4) As such this concept of universal redemption does not discriminate between sins it allows everyone to be resolved of sins which is in line with all sin been equal.I disagree with my opponent that contraception should not be allowed, as then the logical conclusion follows that sex should only result in impregnation. So the idea is that sex should not be for pleasure but this goes against the bible which says in Corinthians 1 verse 7 that sex is encouraged; "Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency."(5) In fact it says to have sex that you should not be tempted to be unchaste (incontinency).(6) This is interesting as this is the exact opposite of what my opponent argues when he says "To not have sex shows a respect for the person and gives you a better sensation during sexual pleasure, just as taking off from cake for an entire year would give you more pleasure than if you ate the cake everyday. (You might want to start wanting a different kind of cake and losing respect for that same kind you eat everyday)". Additionally, the concept of pregnancy is not relevant as contraception can prevent pregnancy. The Christian Unilateralist does not have an official stance on this issue, in fact they hold the following position; "Members are free to believe whatever they want about other issues, and to interpret our shared beliefs in their own personal way".(7)In closing, I do not think the age of a Church has anything to do with been right. If age was related to been right then as I am older than my opponent, my arguments should naturally be right. I hand the debate back to my opponent.(1) http://www.auburn.edu...(2) http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...(3) http://plato.stanford.edu...(4) http://www.christianuniversalist.org...(5) http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...(6) http://www.merriam-webster.com...(7) http://www.christianuniversalist.org...