Evolution is proven fact. Prove the biblical god exists. That BOP is always upon believers

"Ready for your demolishing a$$ usual in which you cannot get up from and you owe me an obvious apology because of your shallowness, sluggishness, and feeble-mindedness. " I don't owe anyone an apology, especially you. I meant what I said. Why? Because you haven't negated any of my evidence; you just asserted it with no backup. "But first to let you know the statement on my other argument that you made obviously towards me will not get a response. Take one lucky guess why? If you wish to change something about it, then perhaps it might. But not until then. " I don't know why that won't get a response. It's very relevant to your argument because it compromises not only the integrity of this debate but also the foundation of your argument. I suspect you won't respond to it, though, because you obviously know you messed up and won't admit it. Later you quote: "You cannot prove your god exists. No one can. No one has EVER been able to. And you tell me or anyone who has intelligence and an education, unlike you, that this is a broad claim with bias and no backup? " Did you ever even read my arguments? I SPECIFICALLY state in the second round and in the comment section, of this debate: 1. "I gave scientific evidence, that likely proves the existence of an Entity, from a non-theistic view. " 2. "I may note, that I don't claim that these arguments prove God's existence with absolute certainty, but they are the best arguments when you compare them to competing hypotheses. " I honestly don't know why I'm responding to this, anyways. You never even touched this section of my argument - which is hilarious, because you asked me to "prove the biblical god exists. " I assume, Pro knew they couldn't beat me on this topic, so they went on to use "lazy-science" to support their supposed argument. This is the best part, you guys: "You really are as stupid, as ignorant, and dumb, as moronic as they come. 2 of the videos are from PBS"s FRONTLINE. Oh but wait, you haven"t the foggiest clue as to what PBS is which has been in business since 1970 creating educational programs of all kinds including Sesame Street to Nova, nor as to what FRONTLINE is which has been in business since 1983 and knows one helluva lot more than your teeny tiny leviathan non genie-us tinsel mind ---EVER--- could. The third is from Journeyman Pictures who has been in business for over 20 years and provided some substantial documentaries on other topics such as "The Real Doctor Evil: Kim Jong Il's North Korea - Full Documentary" 4 fricken years ago before this country even got a whiff of it. And the 4th is mere backup for everything stated IF you were to have bothered to have watched ANY of them in which you clearly didn"t. So try flatly lying again. " If I'm being completely honest, I doubt you even watched the videos yourself. When I refuted the videos in the first round, you didn't refute my evidence - you just asserted my claim was wrong without giving a reason why it was wrong. Having said that, you also addressed that I flat out lied; and practically said my evidence is "non-sequitur". There's one problem with this statement: you didn't give any reasons why my arguments were invalid. Now, I just want to address something, that I should've addressed earlier: "Antibiotic resistant microbes is 100% confirmation and certification and proven fact that evolution is taking place right here in the here and the now. Antibiotic resistant microbes are evolving every single second of every single day to become more resistant to antibiotics. " This claim is IRRELEVANT to my argument. I attacked the core of evolution, giving scientific evidence and peer-reviewed studies to show the problems with evolution. After all, if the foundation of evolution is incorrect, then everything he said is meaningless. Why I should get the vote: 1. Pro didn't negate any of my evidence - he, in fact, actually just brought up petty, irrelevant arguments, that doesn't support his case 2. Pro didn't even touch my argument about the existence of God 3. My sources outdid his by far, peer-reviewed to YouTube videos 4. He used vulgar personal attacks towards me