The God Of The KJV Bible Is Purely Moral

God existing isn't relavent to the resolution. I will break down con's argument simply to tickle my brain. Con claims there were quantum fluctuations and stuff. Could this not be a creator? I can interpret god's form as immaterial such as a universal law but not dependent on matter. But if there was no universe and no scale of space then how did everything come from a single point? It couldn't have because space didn't exist either. This point of the big bang must have been chosen because the randomness of the pre-universe would be incapale of any sort of action. That is a preemptive bullet. Why? Your argument: "These quantum fluctuations are a property of no energy and have been confirmed on a macro physics scale." Is useless as it is a source that doesn't back up your point. What the experiment proved: "While this result may appear to just be a simple proof-of-principle, it does represent the first demonstration of truly quantum behavior of a mechanical element in an optomechanical system; it also demonstrates that such systems can be controlled and measured with sufficient care to reveal fragile quantum behavior." Very bottom of essay. And it did require energy because for the experiment to take place they needed to fire a lazer. //////////// *EVEN IF HE EXISTS, THE KJV GOD IS NOT PURLY MORAL* Back on topic. Here are my rebuttals marked by con's numbered arguments. 1. He probably did as expressed above. 2. Not necessarily, he obviously didn't want Eve and Adam to bite one of the fruits from the tree of knowledge. He doesn't want any negative thing to happen but if he were to interfere then he would be violating free will and thus would be immoral in doing so because we would become robots in that moment. If he gave us free will and didn't want us to be able to choose good or evil then why give us it? 3. Indeed. 4. "Can". And using context clues i can tell he is asking for strength, you know, about to be crucified. Mark 14-16 "Watch ye and pray, lest ye enter into temptation. The spirit truly is ready, but the flesh is weak.". Lest ye enter into temptation. Jesus is asking for the strength and willpower to go through with it. This is willing, the Father isn't forcing Jesus. Jesus made the choice in this moment. 5. He created free will. Free will brought along sin. And again you are incorrectly using a verse. It also means something completely independent. 6. The bible says what is going on. God doesn't encourage it. Where does it say this? And again free will. (see #2) If he were to wish to which he will never do. If they were beaten within an inch of their life they wouldn't recover in a day or two. He doesn't say it is ok anywhere. You are misinterpreting again. Where does it say this was his plan? He didn't, it was creation that embraced evil. Ability to choose. He just didn't give us that ability. You can make a machine to read minds, you can make a jetpack and fly but just because we weren't given superpowers doesn't mean you can hold it against him. He didn't disallow, he simply didn't give us the ability. What's the issue? 1. See above arguments. 2. Couldn't? Tis simply didn't. All after argument structure broken. //////////// This is great MagicAin'tReal, i look forward to a great challenge. //////////// And spellcheck is bugged today. Disregard all spelling errors. Description: It takes me to the page but it is blank. Nothing shows up. If it would help, URL: http://www.debate.org...