Absolute Morality proves Biblical Creation

Here is what I am trying to say. One example, Consider those evolutionists who are very concerned about children being taught creation. "This is wrong, " they say, "because you"re lying to children! " Now, Obviously this begs the question since the truth or falsity of creation is the concern at issue: we are convinced that creation is true, And evolution is the lie. But the truly absurd thing about such evolutionary arguments is that they are contrary to evolution! That is, In an evolutionary worldview, Why shouldn"t we lie "particularly if it benefits our survival value? Certainly the Christian believes that it"s wrong to lie, But then again, The Christian has a reason for this. God has indicated in His Word that lying is contrary to His nature (Num. 23:19), And that we are not to engage in it (Exod. 20:16). But apart from the biblical worldview, Why should we tell the truth? For that matter, Why should we do anything at all? Words like "should" and "ought" only make sense if there is an absolute standard given by one who has authority over everyone. If human beings are merely chemical accidents, Why should we be so concerned about what they do? We wouldn"t get mad at baking soda for reacting with vinegar; that"s just what chemicals do. So why would an evolutionist be angry at anything one human being does to another, If we are all nothing more than complex chemical reactions? If we are simply evolved animals, Why should we hold to a code of conduct in this "dog-eat-dog" world? After all, What one animal does to another is morally irrelevant. When evolutionists attempt to be moral, They are "borrowing" from the Christian worldview. One humorous example of this happened at the opening of the Creation Museum. A group opposing the museum (Defcon " "The Campaign to Defend the Constitution") hired a plane to circle above with a trailing banner that read, "Defcon says thou shalt not lie. " Of course, I couldn"t agree more! After all, This is one of the Ten Commandments. In fact, The purpose of the Creation Museum is to present the truth about origins. So the evolutionists had to borrow from the biblical worldview in order to argue against it. In an evolutionary universe, Defcon"s moral objection makes no sense. You seem to think that it is a group that decides the question of morality. However, This view has the same defects as the others. It merely shifts an unjustified opinion from one person to a group of people. It is arbitrary and leads to absurd conclusions. Again, We find that we would not be able to denounce certain actions that we know to be wrong. After all, Hitler was able to convince a majority of his people that his actions were right, But that doesn"t really make them right. One of the problems you are going to find when you examine atheism (or any non-biblical worldview) from a rational perspective is that there is no foundation for making any moral claims whatsoever. That is, As a non-Christian, You cannot rationally claim that anything is an atrocity, Or that anyone has ever done anything wrong. You can certainly say that the biblical God has done things that displease you, But the concepts of "right" and "wrong" are meaningless in an atheistic universe because there can be no objective universal standard " only personal, Subjective opinions. Numbers 31:7-18: The Midianites were previously involved in leading Israel into sin which caused God to judge the nation, So the death penalty for those involved was just. The virgin girls who were spared would have been mostly little girls who were too young to be married, And too young to be much good as slaves. So this is a case of the girls being mercifully absorbed into the nation of Israel. Passages taken out of context to support rape: Deuteronomy 22:28-29: To understand the reason behind this law, It is necessary to point out a few details. First, The Hebrew word here is simply the word "to have sexual relations with"; some English translations simply interpret this as "rape. " In the ancient world, Women were so closely guarded by their families that it is possible that in this instance, It is not rape at all, And that the woman was willing. Furthermore, Even in the case of rape, The woman might well demand that the man marry her because she would be unmarriageable. See 2 Samuel 13:1"22 for an instance where a rape victim demanded marriage. Deuteronomy 22:23-24: Like the above, This law uses the word for "to have sexual relations with"; some modern translations assume the meaning "rape" but this is not in the original. This refers specifically to engaged women (in the ancient world engagement was as legally binding as marriage and required a divorce to cancel) who are inside a town. As closely-packed as ancient towns were, She would be helped if she screamed; since she did not scream, There is an assumption that it was not rape, But adultery. Furthermore, Why is the atheist concerned? Two atheistic evolutionists wrote a book with the horrifying claim that men rape for evolutionary reasons"one of them squirmed in an interview to justify why rape should be considered wrong under his worldview. God condemns murder in so many places that to accuse Him of murder (that is, The intentional killing of persons which have committed no capital offense) is ludicrous.