Creationism should be banned from science classes

In this debate, My opponent has made made many flippant, And ill informed stabs at me, And creationism. Most of his "convincing" arguments are vague, And obscure references to "science". I'll say this again, There is no way that we could have rationally debated the original topic. This is because your entire premise rested on creationism being a myth. It is not, It should be taught in schools right along with evolution. Creationism is the reality of the earth we live in today but is never treated as such. I will also say this again, Please pay attention this time, To disprove evolution is to prove creationism, Either the earth happened by accident, Or it didn't. Which is to say that if it did not evolve, Then it was created. This statement about expert opinion is also total nonsense, Very few people, If any, On this site are "experts", Yet we debate. All that is really being said here is that google has more results for whatever he searches for. If you read his arguments, Very little is him debating, And the parts where he does, Are filled with assumptions and jabs at my intelligence simply because I believe that the earth was created. Professional evolutionists side with evolution, Imagine that, Give me a second to overcome that brutal slice of logic. Anyone who read these arguments closely will notice that whenever I give him evidence from experts, They are "psuedo-scientists". Again, This is horrible structure as far as debating goes, Or the word I find most fitting is vague. I have proved that your transition fossils were pathetic and there is no family tree. I have also shown that these dating methods used by scientists are highly faulty, And altogether unreliable. These "facts" are as pathetic as your THEORY of evolution. I did not plagiarize a paragraph from the website that he provided, I referenced a completely different website which I cited under said paragraph. I understand that scientists have tried to cover up Mary Schweitzers findings, Because those alone destroy the theory of evolution. However, Scientists also extracted DNA from those fossils, DNA does not last millions of years. Also, Contrary to your belief, It does not create itself. Many of these fossils that are supposedly 70 millions years old are barely mineralized if at all. Also, Before I move forward, Let me educate you on how to debate. When an intelligent person debates they put proof behind their statements which you have rarely done. You should be talking about things like, What is the proof that these findings where the result of common bacterial process? Or, How have these ideas been debunked by more recent biology? I don't know if you know this, But the fact that your sources are more recent in no way proves my evidence to be false that's faulty logic. Also contrary to what you have stated over and over, There is quite a bit of scientific evidence that backs creationism. What about Lazarus bacteria a bacteria revived from salt inclusions supposedly 250 million years old? Or the fact that there is very limited variation in the DNA sequence on the human Y-chromosome around the world? Or the fact that experiments performed by "experts" show that with conditions mimicking natural forces, Oil, Coal, And opals all form quickly, Indicating that it does not need millions of years to develop. What about the fact that the amount of salt in the world's oldest lake contradicts its supposed age and suggests an age more consistent with its formation after Noah's Flood, Which is consistent with a young age of the earth. You literally asked me to find a verse about dinosaurs in the bible so I obliged, Nice try. The bible has yet to be proved historically wrong, So it remains more of a fact than your theory of evolution. Contrary to evolution the bible explains how the earth began not simply how it is today. Which brings us back to the question that no evolutionist can answer, Where did the very first thing that evolved come from? Where did it start? These simple questions expose how truly ridiculous this theory is. Evolutionists can't even tell you how their theory begins, How can you still claim that it is a fact? DON'T IGNORE THIS, WHERE DID PHOSPHATES, NITRATES, CARBON, OR WATER COM FROM THEN? WERE DID THE THINGS NECESSARY TO EVOLVE THESE THINGS COME FROM? I don't need to disprove every transition fossil on the "family tree" to expose what a ridiculous structure it truly is, All it is, Is a collection of different species of animals that are lined up in a way that makes one seem more complicated than the other. This tooth fairy analogy is a testimony to how weak my opponents structure really is, Great comparison, At least in the story of the easter bunny, We are told were it came from. Creationism belongs in schools, To be taught as fact, The earth did not happen, It was created. Despite my opponents desperate and vague attempts to make the bible seem silly and nonsensical, The fact remains that even to one with an objective perspective of this situation, Creationism is far more likely.