British Monarchy: The United States should have the Queen as Head of State

Constitutional Monarchy "a system in which the powers of a monarch are defined and limited by law. " . http://www.thefreedictionary.com... Monarch "a hereditary sovereign, as a king, queen, or emperor. " . http://dictionary.reference.com... President "( often initial capital letter ) the highest executive officer of a modern republic, as the Chief Executive of the United States. " . http://dictionary.reference.com... Great Britain has a Constitutional Monarchy. The United States of America ( A very separate nation with different ideals and values) can be considered the following; Constitutional, Federal, Presidential, and Republic. The simple notion of putting a monarch anywhere in the U. S Government is impractical and illogical. -Before I go into the impracticality of such a notion let me compare some economic stats between these two (separate) Countries. UK GDP-$2.387 trillion (2013 est. ) GDP Growth Rate-1.8% (2013 est. ) Unemployment-7.2% (2013 est. ) Poverty-16.2% (2011 est. ) . https://www.cia.gov... US GDP-$16.72 trillion (2013 est. ) GDP Growth Rate-1.6% (2013 est. ) Unemployment-7.3% (2013 est. ) Poverty-15.1% (2010 est. ) . https://www.cia.gov... -By these stats I don't see the benefit of adopting any institution of the British government. We are also in control of the Federal Reserve which adds a substantial boost to our already massive economy. Also note in high regard this next statement. "The US has the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world, with a per capita GDP of $49,800. " . https://www.cia.gov... - Though our government and economy has its flaws I think it's fair to say that we are doing just fine without British involvement. Not only do we have the biggest and most powerful economy on the planet but we are also at this current moment the top superpower. We have both an economic and military superiority compared to every other nation (Including the UK). . http://useconomy.about.com... . http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com... . http://www.globalfirepower.com... -When it comes to political fact and influence the US is far superior to the UK. Now on to the more important point. Given the stats and fact of US superiority to the UK there wouldn't be any logical or beneficial reason to put in a foreign nation's government icon into our our government. Besides the fact that the Queen of England has no real Executive power (That power belongs to the prime minister) she has no representation of America on any level being that we have been an independent nation for over 200 years. The UK has a commonwealth while the US is based on capitalism. If necessary I will go into greater detail the workings of the constitution and how our Government works. I do my best to remain unbiased to a notion I feel to be submissive of what it means to be American, but the standing of both nations in the world and the very realistic power of both economies and countries suggests that america is superior. When it comes to the global picture my opponents arguments and stats are irrelevant and even misguiding. An example would be my opponents graph on GDP. While individual GDP may be better in a Constitutional Monarchy the chart doesn't show any specific nation for either institution, and the overall GDP of the US exceeds that of the UK by $14.333 trillion.