The obese should be made to wear odour-combatting undergarments in pubs and bars

With that said, I would like to then post my Re-Rebuttal: Design Flaws My opponent agrees that the device cannot be concealed and thus humiliating to its wearer. Rather than giving up this idea in search of a better solution or even modifying this device to avoid this problem, my opponent accepts the problem and indirectly claims that the problem can serve as a good one. His only justification to this claim, is that it will encourage the wearer to loose wait. What is the problem with this statement? The fact is that going through with this design, and deliberately humiliating thousands if not millions of people so you can "help" them; is going against there personal freedom. What will happen to our already stretched free will, if we force people to change there life style, or be humiliated in public. Affirming this resolution, is affirming a totalitarian form of government in which the government can tell us what to wear, what to eat, what WEIGHT is acceptable, and most importantly, what we should believe in. If these people truly wish to loose weight, then he or she should do it on his or her time and personal liberty. Discrimination My opponent claimed that discrimination in pubs and bars are widespread. He then goes on in naming not one, but several forms of discrimination practiced today. Lets now go through some of his so-called discrimination and how the idea of viewing it as discrimination is flawed. 1)"people who choose to light up cigarettes are ejected,"---> This is hardly discrimination. Upon visiting the pub or bar, the individual agrees to the pubs/ bars policy of no smoking in the interior of the building. This is not directed at a specific group, but the entirety of the population that comes into the pub and or bar. 2)"young people suspected of being underage are ejected"---> Young people who are suspected of being underage are not immediately ejected. They are asked of there ID and if indeed they are too young, they are then asked to leave. This is not discrimination as the pub and bar are just following the law. It is illegal to acquire alcoholic behavior when you are underage. Unless being obese is now illegal, this analogy cannot be made. 3)"alcoholics who are drunk and disorderly are ejected from the premises"--->This is not discrimination in any way. These alcoholics where only ejected as they were a THREAT to both themselves and others. To protect and maintain the right of the other customers within the establishment. Ones again, my opponent claims that obese people release far more flatulence than normal people; however he provides no evidence to support this fallacious claim. Safety My opponent recognizes the danger that comes with this product; however, he provides a rather vague solution. His solution being that these people acquire "public liability insurance and normal people should give obese people in pubs a wide berth. " Is being so fat really that disgusting that you will put both the life of this person and the life of innocent people at risk? to the solution, customer liability is no guarantee what so ever that these people might not get hurt. To the second solution, there is no way that people will provide enough space in a crowed pub to the point of absolute protection from this device. Thank you.