WAR GAME SCENARIO: United States v. Chosen Nation

You keep talking about hyper-realism and how we must make it so that this war would occur in real life and have strategies that are real... but in what instance would the US declare WAR on a neutral country such as Switzerland? Because there would never be war, this ENTIRE DEBATE is declared void. You cannot win a nonexistant war, since war itself has been declared void."it [NATO] realistically will not support Switzerland in any political or economic way" And they are not. They are increasing my civilian total, which is allowed per the rules. NATO is not funding me. Its citizens are. That's totally fine. That's like saying that there will not be US investment worldwide, just because a nation is being hostilized by another one. Also, you said that there can be NO alliances, NOR enemies! This means that, who cares if NATO doesn't want to fund me, the nations are SOVEREIGN and are allowed to rule themselves, and pass their own laws. Your accusations are declared VOID!"NATO is politically an enemy of Switzerland"NATO would not be politically an enemy of a nation that tries to be peaceful in times of hostility. There is no war yet, and there never will be due to declaration of war being VOID. NATO might only be politically an enemy if we engage in hostile acts, which we have not done at all, yet. We are allowed to liquidate all bank accounts. We are allowed to make all non-US people on earth citizens. NATO has no say and they won't be an enemy for our own, private acts."Therefore, 22 EU member states, i.e. 77.57% vote in the EU, will be against this strengthening of ties with a United States enemy"United States is not my enemy. The EU has no say. The nations themselves pass bills, but the nations just so happen to be in the EU. Sovereignty is intact for these nations. Your accusations that nobody would increase citizenship are declared VOID. "It is likely that all 28 NATO member states will ban donation to Switzerland. " Why would they? There is no war. There is no hostility on our side. If anything they would break ties with the US. Your accusation is declared VOID."EU will ban donations entirely in a realistic situation"Why would they? Again, there is no war and there never WILL be a war. Your point is VOID."China is careful not to DIRECTLY antagonize the United States "And neither will Switzerland. Just because I have ~7,000,000,000 new citizens does not mean that they must be hostile.I didn't ask China to fund me, I did not ask China to supply me troops. They did not and I will not ask them. I don't see your point at all...Your point is VOID because it is completely tangential to the debate."All the BRICS nations and the stock markets of various countries are heavily reliant on the USD"This does not matter at all. Who cares if they are reliant? There will be no war, so your point is completely tangential and considered VOID."Therefore, for fear of economic retaliation, most UN member states will declare the Swiss proclamation invalid to their nation and forbid donations and drafting of troops"We're not drafting troops. We are just taking these things called Sovereign Citizens (which claim to not be under ANY LAWS in ANY country) and making sure that they are citizens of Switzerland, so they can at least have a place to live. This is not evil and our intentions are valid, so your point is VOID. The UN does NOT declare the Swiss proclomation invalid!"Therefore, as these scenarios are unrealistic, by Rule 9, I give you a warning and declare your moves in Round 1 void"Nothing I have done is unrealistic, nor void. You are wrong.However, everything that you do after this is VOID, because war would never start, and you are supposed to start a non-existant war!Everything you do after this is VOID and I win the debate. Thanks for trying to declare war on the Swiss, but it will not work.