Most Christian denominations are Psuedo christian, or Athiestic Christian churches

Key words from the versus originally stated from the verses I provided where you said it only spoke of the Holy Spirit and 0% relativity. If you can't comprehend the relationship, perhaps you should have inquired in the comment section if you had time. It has everything to do with the denominations. Who do you think controls the majority of Denominations/Churches and those who claim to be Christians? It sure (IS NOT) can only be the HOLY SPIRIT. Would the HOLY SPIRIT accept, or relinquish division inside JESUS CHRIST's/HOLY SPIRIT's/GOD's place of worship? If mankind was not into brick and mortar buildings being built more and more, larger and larger looking for governmental subsidies and tax-breaks for employees and everyone/everything else, do you still truth be told believe churches would be built as much as they are today? If that is not for corporation business greed (By the way, http://www.uscatholic.org... If you say the answer is not for business in today's church, let's take even a non-christian like hindu, muslim or other faith you think they don't focus on the business requirement aspects first the same time? Who was Jesus Christ's business administrator or treasurer, or does this not imply that when one church gets so big it must divide itself? Big churches are like eye-sores to those who know the truth. Why not just have home-churches, where it is more personal more welcoming, more sincere? Is this or is this not what Christ's ministry is about? Granted, it is nice to have a specific public place of worship and acknowledgement, but for this to take place is someone trying to get acknowledgement for what reason? I would dare say that depending on the type of subsidies received, and the type of services offered or not offered it could very well implicate an implied answer. If the Holy Spirit Prophesied through one of the members to build a specific dimension for specific requirements, and specific location that is one thing, but to go about everything in a business manner *location, location and don't forget location* implies business brick and mortar financial profit concepts. The first time I started to question was approximately 7-8th grade of middle school. Things didn't add up myself. I had a spiritual encounter with a demon from a Southern Baptist Denominational teaching with another adult counselor who just frankly told me, "It's just your imagination playing tricks on you, its not real." From then out on I off and on questioned why we even needed to go to church, and or have denominations, I got strong-armed not knowing how to rebuff such statements as a child from my father. And hearing from one of my sister's boyfriend about how wiccans/occultists can levitate rocks, rotate the moon, and other spiritual capabilities. It made no sense how what I'm hearing in today's denominational teachings really make any sense or had a way to formulate my argument or issues. By simply implying LUCY and infant baptism indicates there is a portion of uncertainty for your belief and statement of faith to practice, leading me to understand that you listen to the word of mankind who have paper degrees on biblical teaching versus listening to only the HOLY SPIRIT for GUIDANCE, I will let the Holy Spirit dictate how or why an infant should be baptized by scriptural references HE leads to be discovered and understood by HIS timing, not mine. I believe from previous statements JESUS CHRIST used for the Roman Leader that the Jailer had similar type of faith and control over his entire household and that was what it implied since it was the only other place I have ever read where a ROMAN turned to seek out the gift of the HOLY SPIRIT or that of JESUS CHRIST's abilities. Unless you can directly conclude how the HOLY SPIRIT would have directed infants to be baptized, that is how I take it directly. Never imply something unless you are firmly 100% in agreement of the example. Have you seen me state such counter-examples yet? And I have yet to see, understand or be explained how children are sanctified through baptizing? Is this what John the Baptist did when he was preparing the way for JESUS CHRIST, he just sanctified them? All death is seen and judged by GOD, not mankind; what does the old testament explain about maturity age of right and wrong and standing before the leaders? "The point I'm saying is, every single thing spoken of spirits/demons, angels, prophets prophecies are all evidence of a spiritual entity either good or bad." This is not the debate I accepted. I accepted the debate that said, "Most Christian denominations are Pseudo christian, or Atheistic Christian churches". What do else do you think would imply Most Christian Denominations are Pseudo Christian or Atheistic Christian churches? The fact that they all seek after the HOLY SPIRIT???? If that's the case, you've badly misunderstood the direction I'm taking this debate. Churches can be dwelling places for spirits and demons to take over from, if you don't believe me explain how churches are not able to be overcome by SATAN and his evil strategies? Without using the HOLY SPIRIT for guidance and direction. They are a necessary evil, because people will believe different things. If we did not have separate names, then you personally could be lumped into the same church that believes in the Immaculate Conception, or the idea that Jesus was not God. On the contrary, if churches were not brick and mortar buildings, the ones who believe will practice and share like-faith when they run into someone contrary they would openly explain their differences and why. If these differences are not prayed over by the HOLY SPIRIT's direction of how to take the church, then they will be identified as such by others who practice the truth faith, and lead other churches of the like-faith to spiritually battle until the church has been won over or dismantled internally. By no means do denominational beliefs take precedence over the Holy Spirit. People from nearly every denomination can be filled with the Holy Spirit. Can other denominational practices have people filled with the Holy Spirit? Yes. Is it more difficult and hard for this to happen? Yes. Why? Because when humankind begins to teach, preach, and explain in man's understanding the HOLY SPIRIT has to cut through all that humankind garble to get to the heart when someone truly seeks GOD for an answer or direction. It clearly is not black and white on every subject. God is, but the scriptures do not address every problem that faces the church. How should we use technology? What is a proper age to start dating? What is the correct interpretation of the fossil evidence? The guidance of the Holy Spirit can most definitely be sought in all these things, but the Bible does not directly address every problem we face. Every subject is black and white for those who seek and BELIEVE in HIS NAME. Why? Because HE will make discernment and understanding for such questions, problems and unknown certainties. Until GOD has filled you with adequate answers to poke holes in humankind's understanding of such questions you need to use the same question they use and reverse the question on them using GOD's answers. Every answer Humanists use, Creationists can paint a different picture because GOD never intended Christians to be concerned about these things as GOD created all GOD can destroy all. "There are more prosperity preachers (in terms of brick and mortar churches itself) seeking to be self-sustained by a church following than those who seek after CHRIST's HOLY SPIRIT directly for guidance and direction." Source this? I understand to have answered up above. "Just because one is persecuted does not mean that they seek the HOLY SPIRIT... does it?" You'd have to be a special kind of idiot to tell the ISIS member with a sword at your throat that you believe in Jesus if you didn't actually have that faith. I believe I have addressed this either above or in the comments. "And are you implying that if someone's a Christian one does not have any spirits or demons possessed in them still and that the temple of the HOLY SPIRIT is automatically clean?" Nope. I never intended to imply that. If you think I did, please quote where I said that and I will clarify. "Scriptures most certainly are talking about the Holy Spirit. I never said they did not. I said that simply because churches do not perform miracles does not mean they are not Christian. If they profess faith and truly believe, then they are Christian, and the fruits of the Spirit, such as love and joy, will result from that." If churches are not practicing perform such activities like laying of hands it implies once saved, there's no more spirit or demon in a Christian. (to me at least) I feel that this was originally intended to be sarcastic. I certainly have felt driven by the Holy Spirit to pray for someone on the spot --- I have blogged about just such an experience, and it changed my life. If I had not had that experience, however, I would still be a Christian, not pseudo-Christian or atheist. I would question, (myself included) if I am not daily seeking HIM out, I may fall out of HIS grace (perhaps I am too legalistic) and until I truly repent seeking HIM I am borderline pseudo/atheistic due to the analogy plain that replace HIM with something else at that exact moment of my life for HIM to use me. I didn't tell you to build up and encourage division. I said that you, and all of us Christians, should seek to build up one another into truth and faith, rather than fruitless name-calling and finger-pointing. How does one not build up without tearing down and seeking to understand why the problems are occurring? Jesus built up all and didn't call anyone fruitless name-calling and finger-pointing did he? Oh, wait he did.. I forgot did you forget too?