Inherited Sin as taught by the Christian Church is False

My opponent states that I do not understand the doctrine of Original Sin and uses wikipedia as a source, which is laughable. I stated that Original Sin" . .. teaches that we are all condemned to the most painful punishment ( burning in hell ) for something that we did not even do! Even children are guilty of a crime that they did not commit. "Let us see if the Church Fathers agree with my understanding of this doctrine;ST. IRENAEUS (c. 180 AD)". .. .having become disobedient, [Eve] was made the cause of death for herself and for the whole human race; so also Mary, betrothed to a man but nevertheless still a virgin, being obedient, was made the cause of salvation for herself and for the whole human race. .. .Thus, the knot of Eve's disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. What the virgin Eve had bound in unbelief, the Virgin Mary loosed through faith. . .. But this man [of whom I have been speaking] is Adam, if truth be told, the first-formed man. .. .WE, however, are all FROM him; and as WE are FROM him, WE have INHERITED his title [of sin]. . .. Indeed, THROUGH the first Adam, WE offended God by not observing His command. Through the second Adam, however, we are reconciled, and are made obedient even unto death. For we were debtors to none other except to Him, whose commandment WE transgressed at the beginning. " (Against Heresies 3:22:4; 3:23:2; 5:16:3) (. http://forums.canadiancontent.net...)Now contrast this definition with the one from wikipedia, that my opponent supplies, and ask yourself which one is more of an authority on Original Sin;"Original sin may be taken to mean the sin that Adam committed, a consequence of this first sin, the hereditary stain with which we a born with on account of our origin or descent from Adam. Original sin is the general condition of sinfulness, that is ( the absence of holiness and perfect charity ) into which humans are born, distinct from the actual sins that a person commits. Human beings do not bear any "original guilt" (condemnation) from Adam's particular sin, which is his alone. Human beings bear no guilt/condemnation for the sin of Adam. ( www. en. m. wikipedia. org/wiki/Original_sin)"I have supplied more early Church Fathers writings about Original Sin for the reader to examine;TERTULLIAN (c. 200 AD)"Finally, in every instance of vexation, contempt, and abhorrence, you pronounce the name of Satan. He it is whom we call the angel of wickedness, the author of every error, the corrupter of the whole world, through whom MAN was deceived in the very beginning so that he transgressed the command of God. On ACCOUNT of his transgression MAN was given over to death; and the WHOLE HUMAN RACE, which was INFECTED by his SEED, was made the TRANSMITTER of condemnation. (The Testmiony of the Soul 3:2, c. 200 AD)"ORIGEN (c. 244 AD)"EVERY SOUL that is BORN into flesh is SOILED by the filth of wickedness and SIN. .. .And if it should seem necessary to do so, there may be added to the aforementioned considerations [referring to previous Scriptures cited that we all sin] the fact that in the Church, Baptism is given FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS; and according to the usage of the Church, Baptism is given EVEN TO INFANTS. And indeed if there were nothing in infants which REQUIRED a remission of sins and nothing in them pertinent to forgiveness, the grace of Baptism would seem SUPERFLUOUS. (Homilies on Leviticus 8:3)The Church received from the Apostles the tradition of giving Baptism EVEN TO INFANTS. For the Apostles, to whom were committed the secrets of divine mysteries, knew that there is in everyone the INNATE STAINS OF SIN, which must be WASHED AWAY through water and the Spirit [cf. John 3:5; Acts 2:38]. (Commentaries on Romans 5:9)"ST. CYPRIAN OF CARTHAGE (c. 250 AD)"If, in the case of the worst sinners and of those who formerly sinned much against God, when afterwards they believe, the REMISSION OF THEIR SINS is granted and no one is held back from Baptism and grace, how much more, then, should an INFANT not be held back, who, having but recently been BORN, has done no sin [committed no personal sin], EXCEPT THAT, BORN OF THE FLESH ACCORDING TO ADAM, HE HAS CONTRACTED THE CONTAGION OF THAT OLD DEATH FROM HIS FIRST BEING BORN. For this very reason does he approach more easily to receive the REMISSION OF SINS: because the SINS FORGIVEN HIM are NOT his OWN but THOSE OF ANOTHER [i. e. inherited from Adam]. (Letters 64:5 of Cyprian and his 66 colleagues in Council to Fidus)" . http://forums.canadiancontent.net...)It seems that my esteemed opponent does not know the tenents of his own faith, as the Catholic catechism is very clear on the matter;"Moreover, the souls of those who depart in actual mortal sin or in original sin only, descend immediately into hell but to undergo punishments of different kinds [see n.464]. ""The souls of those who die in mortal sin, or with original sin only [e. g. infants], however, immediately descend to hell, yet to be punished with different punishments. " (Council of Lyons II, Denzinger #464) [Note: Infants who die in the state of Original Sin only (that is, unbaptized infants), are traditionally believed to descend to the "upper regions of hell" where - although not suffering physical torments and are in a state of 'natural happiness' - are pained by being deprived by the loss of the Beatific Vision. Never has the Church recognized another means of salvation for such infants besides Baptism. ]" "It (the Roman Church) teaches. .. that the souls. .. of those who die in mortal sin, or with only original sin [e. g. infants] descend immediately into hell; however, to be punished with different penalties and in different places. " (Pope John XXII, Denzinger #493a). . http://www.mycatholicsource.com...So I repeat my contention that Original Sin stands against the law of Justice and God, and I would invite my opponent to become better equiped with the knowledge of the faith that he professes. I await his response.