Earth is a spinning ball.

It's obvious my opponent has never had a serious formal debate, she should probably just stick to rap battles. She has completely disregarded any evidence with a sneering nuh-uh, while providing no actual rebuttals to any of my claims. I don't know how anyone could ignore the obvious copy-paste methods, sex in clouds, etc that I provided, besides the fact that NASA admits that it is Photoshop, this isn't just a rare occurrence either, I believe that 100% of the media we pay for by the way, is falsified. Space walks are in a giant pool,(1) all photos of earth are photoshopped, all videos of earth are fisheye lenses, every photograph of space is cgi artwork, and the moon landing was a studio film, the lunar module looks like a homeless tweeker's shelter. Buzz can leave a 1-2" deep footprint, but that thing didn't even leave a blast crater, or kick up any dirt at all for that matter, as apparent with the glowing tinfoil lined landing gear. Seriously how did that thing get back off the ground? (1) . http://www.space.com... This is clearly a case of confirmation bias. As the format of this debate has been mutilated by my opponent, and no arguments have fully rebbuted, I don't see the point in furthering my argument, and just am tempted to forward all points, but I want my opponent to remember this argument until she wakes up, she has a few years to grow up, so I will try. I would also like her to watch one documentary on the flat earth theory because I believe she may be smart enough, one day, to be able to spread the word. "filtered out and turned back into drinkable water. " The water is slung into computers in several of the iss clips, water is sucked into air vents and filtered? Right, no source, I'm pulling a you on that one, no source, no rebuttal. Here's some more funny business. ISS Hoax: . http://www.youtube.com... I'm sure the voters can agree, substantial evidence has been provided, with much of it not even examined by my opponent. " Because I obviously didn't read what you said" The claims may be wild to you, but they are certainly back with evidence. Highly doubtful. .. Their mournful faces and eyes tell a different story, it's not like they are on trial. There's nervous happy, and there's nervous being told to lie, or die. I'm anarchist, and governments have been lying to their people for centuries. . http://www.washingtonsblog.com... The explanation is that there is obvious Photoshop manipulation, this was clarified in the first argument. Already answered the question, and it wasn't that simple. Another case of "Because I obviously didn't read what you said"? The younger generations are getting dumbed down, that is what is wrong with me. Im sure you'll continue to remain glued to the tell lie vision programming, Justin beiber concerts, and rap battles. Whether you believe it or not, is irrelevant, so why continue with this argument, it is not relavant to the debate. I want to thank my opponent for accepting the debate and ask her to, in further debates, not be so black and white about everything. If you refuse to even entertain the idea that the other side of the story may be true, no amount of evidence will convince you, it is not until you forget what science has told you so far that you will begin to see. Since my opponent has to forfeit the last round, I will let her give a closing statement.