Christians are NOT able to determine fairly if Jesus is really the True messiah

I have to say that as unfortunate as it sounds, you're right to say that most Christians don't investigate the history behind their allegiance to Christ and His Message. But Im not here to speak on their behalf; but rather here to show you the Biblical and logical proofs of the First Advent of Jesus Christ as the Messiah of the Jews. To the Christian community I say this; it should not be forgotten that faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead (James 2:17). So being saved simply because you say "you believe"is Scripturally impossible. However, let's address the debate topic: There are numerous verses in the O.T. that point to Jesus to be the Messiah awaited by the Jews. It is unreasonable to think that God would send a Messenger without giving Him ample proof to validate His claim. So it is safe to say that Christians do not believe in blind faith because the Bible never calls them to blindly accept anything. The fact that most individuals do, should not shake the Faith of those who study the Scriptures daily and preach the Word of God. Therefore blind faith is faith without evidence and the evidence is so overwhelming that Jesus says in John 5:39-40, "You diligently study the Scriptures because you think that by them you posses eternal life. These are the Scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life" In the OT, Isaiah 41:21 it asks to produce cause and bring forth your strong reason, which Christ had successfully done and in Amos 3:7, it says that "Surely the Sovereign Lord does nothing without revealing his plan to his servants the prophets". The thing is, that Christ made His claim and fulfilled the Judaic Prophecies yet died on the CRoss with 12 brave adherents. In Isaiah 41:22-23 it says, "Declare to us the things to come, tells us what the future holds, so that we may know that you are gods." This is an invitation to fulfill prophecy, which Jesus being the Messiah, had to do and did. The question is, are prophecies reliable proofs of God's Messengers? Yes! It is prophecies that in fact offer the most undeniable evidence of Christ's Mission. Evidences such as....: The Virgin Birth (Isaiah 7:14), The 7weeks & 62 weeks(Book of Daniel), Birth in Bethlehem(Micah 5:2), Riding the donkey into Jerusalem (Zechariah 9:9), The betrayal of Judas (Zechariah 13:6), The payment of Judas by the Pharicees to complete his task (Zechariah 11:12), The regret of Judas (Zechariah 11:13), The silent defense of Jesus's innocence when brought on trial (Isaiah 53:7). Description of crucifixion (Psalms 22:16) and others. The fact that everything prophesied concerning Christ's first appearance took place exactly as foretold provides absolute confidence that all the prophecies concerning His return will surely come to pass. But keep in mind that these prophecies are not to be read but thoroughly studied. The lack of investigation was a clear issue in the time of Christ when He condemned religious leaders because they refused to heed the signs of the times. On one occasion, they came to Him and asked Him to perform a miracle to prove He was the Messiah. Jesus rebuked them severely by saying "Do you know how to discern the appearance of the sky, but cannot discern the signs of the times? (Matt 16:3) Jesus was trying to point out that although the men He was addressing, could predict the weather by reading the signs of thr clouds and nature, they couldn't interpret His Significance by simply reading the signs of God's Word, which was their sole duty. But you may ask what "signs of the times" is Jesus referring to. Well my friend, He was referring to the fact that the Hebrew Scriptures contain more than 300 prophecies about His First Coming. Funny thing is that, while the Hebrew Scriptures point to The First Coming of Christ, they also point to His 2nd Coming as well. So the question is, what does the OT mean when it says "Coming of the Messiah?" Well, it's important to note that, two completely different portraits of a Coming Messiah were described by the OT prophets. The portraits, painted by the hand of God, were placed on the same canvas, framed in one picture. How, you may ask? Well, for those who lived prior to the Birth of Jesus, the perspective of these 2 portraits of the Messiah was difficult to understand. So imagine a man looking at a bunch of mountains. He's able to see the peak of one mountain and beyond it the peak of another. However from this view point, he can't see the valley which separates these 2 mountains. Similarly, men viewed the 2 portraits of the Messiah in the same manner. They saw 2 different persons, but missed the connection. They didn't understand that there could be just one Messiah, coming in 2 different roles and separated by the valley of time. One portrait of the Messiah depicts Him as a humble servant dubbed "the Suffering Messiah"in Isaiah 53. The other shows the Messiah as a conquering king with a ton of power, who comes in the height of war and saves the Israelites from injustice. Descriptions of a such "Reigning Messiah" is found in Zechariah 14 and Isaiah 9:6,7 So now, it's easy to see why the 2nd would be the most popular portrait, right? Right. But this was sooo confusing to the Rabbis of the time that they actually theorized that 2 Messiahs would be coming; a humble one and reigning one! Just like today, some people can't see how both portraits could be true of the same person, but when literalism is completely replaced with the rightful Spritual perspective, things wI'll finally begin to make total sense. This "Jewish" problem is similar if not exactly the same as the problem the Christian community is currently having. They have 2 completely different portraits of the return of Christ, that to some appears as a Thief in the Night (2 Peter 3:10, 1 Thessalonians 5:2) and the other portrait as the Christ where He returns as a King from the sky with heavenly light shining for every eye to see. So for both Jews and Christians, there is a line that must be drawn separating literalism from Spiritual perspective. These are the obstacles in front of both Communities today. So in conclusion, you may reject the First Coming of Jesus as the Messiah and say that I'm satisfied with what I have, I'll know when the Messiah comes, He'll be like the King David in strength, like Alexander in wit, and Solomon in power. But understand that if you take such a position to say that I don't need to study the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled, then you my friend are focusing too much on the obstacles and not enough on what the OT actually says. Believe me, when you've read them, studied them through and through, and understood it's Spiritual Meaning, then you will surely recognize Christ as your Supreme Savior and Redeemer. Your turn my friend. :)