Earth Is Absolutely Immobile

I'm going to first start off plain and simple: You don't know what you're talking about. :O Are you suggesting, that Galileo, the one that is known to have coutered Geocentrism,would admit that he was wrong and go back on years of work? I didn't suggest it. I proved it by quoting Galileo himself. And I also provided a source that showed him admitted he was wrong several years previously. So we have Galileo on record admitting he was wrong twice. the quotes you give are incorrect. What you are doing is taking a quote and adding your own words to manipulate it It's called paraphrasing bro. We know that the Universe is ever expanding. It has been proved time and time again! You cannot refute that! I don't need to try. Just because the universe might be expanding doesn't mean the Earth has to be moving. This is simple common sense. The universe could be expanding outward in all 360 degrees away from Earth. if the universe is expanding uniformly according to Hubble's law, then it will appear to do so from any vantage point. This is simply nonsense, Con, I'm sorry your source is so awful. Hubble's law says absolutely nothing about expansion appearing the same from all reference points. It just says that red-shifts might mean galaxies are moving away from Earth. It says absolutely nothing about doing that "from any vantage point." Moreover, since galaxies are arranged in multilayered, spherical shells around Earth, then if they are expanding away from Earth, it is both logically and physically impossible for this to be true for any other reference point besides Earth. This is quite easy for me to prove. Imagine a balloon. Imagine it has a dot on it representing Earth. Now draw concentric circles around Earth. Now blow up the balloon, and watch the concentric circles expand around Earth. Notice how it is absolutely impossible to find any another vantage point on the balloon that is also surrounded by concentric, expanding circles. There you go. Had you read this, you would know that Hubble used his law to discover that there is no way to find the center of the Universe! Had you read your own source, you would know Hubble did no such thing. And for the record, Hubble had serious doubts that red-shifts meant galaxies were moving away from us. It's ironic the law is named after him since he hardly believed it himself. I can quote him to prove it if you want. But I'm just sayin'. If Foucault's pendulum is caused by distant masses rotaing around the Earth and not Earth's rotation itself... then how do you explain the fact that multiple pendulums are placed around the world that have the same result as each other?! Lol... the same way you explain it with your false heliocentric model. The Coriolis Force. Except the Coriolis Force is caused by the stars and galaxies, etc. rotating around Earth. the gravity wouldn't be even close to being able to move those pendulums around in that manner! Really? You don't think the gravity of billions of stars and galaxies is strong enough to knock a little pendulum a tiny bit off course? Then I guess you don't believe the one moon has enough gravity to cause tides in the massive ocean. Also, what about the movement of Mars in the night sky? ARE YOU GOING TO SAY THAT MARS ORBITS THE EARTH LIKE THAT? No lol. Mars orbits the sun, but the sun orbits Earth. That would be crazy for Mars to do that. The whole universe rotates on the purple X, created by the Axes of Evil. Earth isn't perfectly in the center of the universe, as you can tell. However, this debate ony says Earth is immobile. I'm just proving Earth doesn't move. I don't have to prove it's the geometrical center, but it's extremely close. It really is the center of MASS though. What about our atmosphere? The atmosphere proves the Earth is immobile. If Earth were really shooting through space at 66,000 mph and spinning at 1,000 mph at the same time, you would get blown away as soon as you walked outside. I mean, seriously. Take Venus for example. It's not even spinning 1/10 times as fast as you people say Earth is, but the winds on Venus are over 200 mph.(6) Neptune rotates every 20 hours(7) which is comparable to how fast you think Earth rotates. But it's constantly like a hurricane on Neptune. The wind blows over 700 mph!(8) Meanwhile, aside from storms caused by temperature variation, Earth often enjoys total calm. There's no way Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph, much less flying around the sun at 66,000 mph. Oh and by the way, I don't think I explained the spiral orbit of the sun around Earth well in the previous round with my graphic, so here's an animation that explains it better: http://galileowaswrong.com... Our jet streams? They are caused by the Coriolis Force which I explained is caused by the rotation of the stars around Earth. Let me repeat: You don't know what you are talking about. All of you arguments are ignoring the basics! That means that Earth Rotates! You might think it do, but it don't. (6) http://www.astronomy.com... (7) https://pds.jpl.nasa.gov... (8) http://www.bbc.co.uk...