Men are smarter than women

Drops- Don't let him try to address these as I would have no way to refute them. 1. My appreciation for Dexter, was never acknowledged by opponent 2. His further dis-enfranchisement of women. 3. Athletic intelligence (Please read the argument itself not this small outline) 4. Lack of evidence for equality in mathematical fields. 5. The cosmos article which directly contradicted his thesis a sentence after the one he quoted. (Consider this a turn) 6. "Furthermore the fact that men have more diverse and longer sexual fantasies is still not correlated to intelligence, in the same way women talking to other women more about there petty and tedious problems is not indicative of intelligence but there incurable need for childish attention, which is why they relate better to children in the first place (which in turn is why they're elementary or middle school teachers up until higher academic levels like college where men then take over.) CONSIDER THIS A TURN THAT GARNERS A FURTHER BURDEN OF PROOF." 7. The Patriarchy argument was misinterpreted by my opponent he never addresses the analysis I give about brute force being retarded by intelligence (pun). 8. Religion was also mis-interpreted and the base thesis fell into a non-sequitur set logical assumptions (women only have girls, men only have boys) Consider the perpetuated dis-enfranchisement as clear offense. 9. This wasn't a drop but take into account his mis-information about EQ which was massaged to mis-direct the reader. Social Intelligence Lacan "was a French psychoanalyst and psychiatrist who made prominent contributions to psychoanalysis and philosophy" (http://en.wikipedia.org...) He was a PhD in psychoanalysis and a clinical psychiatrist. Foucault "is best known for his critical studies of social institutions, most notably psychiatry, medicine, the human sciences and the prison system, as well as for his work on the history of human sexuality." Althusser published books on psycho-analysis Badiou- His book on ethics explains the sociology of moral systems Zizek- Okay fine, maybe not a traditional psychoanalysis, but he often writes on the subject. Freud's Daughter "Most of her life was dedicated to her father and his work" She was clearly standing on the shoulders of her father, and my opponent couldn't quote anything that she contributed on her own, while he was very familiar with the work of Freud himself. The implications are clear, either she really didn't contribute much of her own, or my opponent is to misogynistic to give her credit (The former is probably more correct). Multi-tasking He quotes 1 study, and it turns out that it was the only study ever on the subject where only 50 males and 50 females were selected. So I would assume that this one premature study with only a limited number of people and results where there was only one variable in intelligence is not enough to claim universally that women are better then men at multi-tasking. Part 2: I used the same site he did in his first speech. On IQ "Who cares that g-factor fails to explain the variation between someone who scores a 150 and someone who scores a 155." He concedes that the G-factor is not entirely accurate. This is especially important for men who measure 15 to 1 on the top 1% of intelligence to say that it should not make a difference would be extremely dis-honest. We are not measuring workplace performance, the test only demonstrates a knowledge of some arbitrary set of factors which generally coincide to how hard people work, not their actual aptitude. On EQ My opponent offers no source to explain a beeter EQ score in his last speech, however I just happen to have one "the average EQ scores for women (98) and men (100)" (http://www.sq.4mg.com...) It may have been a blatant lie or mis-information on his part. CONSIDER THIS A TURN ALSO. Men have a better IQ and EQ then women. On health factors. My opponent doesn't sort his supposition and just asserts them with no way of confirming it or not. Don't take his word for it. Also, (if it is true) in the same way I would say that, After you adjust for white people not being as athletically coordinated as African Americans, white people actually perform better. Don't buy this study. On Sexual fantasies. College Prof. are still 70+% male whatever the reason. Cosmos 1. Just because you have a clever saying from your college days, doesn't give you offense in this debate round. Women working harder is not thing we're debating. 2. He says they have higher EQ's i have proved otherwise. He tries to claim that I never addressed this but obviously I quoted from Cosmos "This could be because male-dominated fields have been hit the hardest, like manufacturing and finance." Women are physically ill-equipped to work in manufacturing and men take more higher reward risks which is why the vast majority of Wall-Street is male. 3. He quotes, Nassim Taleb as a Wall-street guru. Nassim Taleb is male. I could stop here but I won't. The vast majority of Wall street employers aren't looking for safe long term investments, rather they are looking for smart short-term money making strategies with high risk high reward monologues. Men are better at making money on Wall-street. On religion my opponent answers this with the notion that smart men are, in a Darwinist fashion weeding themselves out leaving only women. For some reason when smart Men remain celibate only smart women can be born. This is completely wrong obviously because women don't only breed girls. And men don't only breed men. Extend the analysis on the first speech that talks about the perpetuation of the dis-enfranchisement of Christian women, who for some reason are coerced into religious institutions which step on them phenomenally and transcendentally. That makes them stupid. On patriarchy He augments his Pearce evidence with more speculation from another speculator. He offers ZERO facts on the issue and simply makes a claim about gender identification. He then mis-interprets my existential analysis as something that is required to be lucrative in foreign markets. That's not what I meant. extend the analysis that men have more existential intelligence then women. Furthermore none of this has anything to do with my initial argument about Patriarchy ". Humanity is by no means the largest species in terms of brute force and the like. However I'm sure my opponent would agree that, insofar as we have obviously conquered the natural world, I.e. replacing bio-centrism with our own anthropocentric sentient in terms of polluting rivers, harvesting animals, and bringing our children to zoo's, it would be appropriate to assume we've "won". Women in the same respect are not subservient because of rugged manly sex appeal or sheer physical force. Rather as I've alluded to before assertiveness is a matter of intelligence." Extend this offense. Don't let him try to address in his next speech as it would abusive in terms of allowing me a response. On perceptions Perceptions aren't developed irrespective of fact. The perception that women are sub-servant was developed from somewhere. And even if it perpetuates it's own claim the claim is still valid. Pointing out the cause of the thesis isn't disproving the thesis. Moreover to say that if a a child with down syndrome is only perceived as less intelligent, would be correct. I'm sure to some people children with down syndrome are equaled in some arbitrary set of functions, but the almost homogenized subjective hypothesis that mental handicaps are indicative of less intelligence irrespective of the objective claim which say would they are equal, Would be much more widely agreed upon, and much more correct. VOTE PRO!!!!