Swimming in the Ocean is Better than Swimming in a Public Pool 2.0

I find it amusing how you incorrectly counter my arguments. For example, one of my main points was to express why the chemical disinfectants added to public pool water was so bad. You do not get the topic. THE PROBLEM IS THE CHEMICALS. And yes, I remember the oil spills. The problem with this argument is that science defies it. Let's go back to the basics. Four oil molecules, eight water molecules. The oil molecules are submerged into the eight water molecules, and disperse evenly. Now take this into a wider perspective and look at the seven oceans which cover 2/3 of the Earth, as you so kindly mentioned. It is incorrect of you to state that the "SEAS are constantly being bombarded by ships leaking fuel and chemicals into the marine wildlife's environment," for we are debating the OCEANS compared to PUBLIC POOLS. Even if OCEANS was understood, the argument would still be incorrect, for you have no evidence backing your argument stating that the oceans are CONSTANTLY being bombarded. Also, I do not "let" my friends, family, and co-workers swim in the ocean. It is a choice based on free will, not pertaining to this debate. Also, you have no proof that the SEA (notice, you said one, as there is, as you seem to think, only one massive body of water known as "the sea") is FILLED with poisonous materials. Any reason why you did not name any examples? If you are to argue that "the sea" is FILLED with such, it would be nice to know with what. And, I counter your argument that swimming in the ocean gives you the same effects as in a POOL (notice, you did not specify whether public or personal- the debate is on public). First of all, even if the fact that the "genre" of pool was understood as public, your argument would be considered non sequitur, because you are basically saying here that it doesn't matter whether you swim in a POOL or the ocean. It has the same effects. Once again, where is the evidence? Also, studies have shown that one receives more exercise via swimming in ocean compared to in public pools. For example, swimming against waves is great for muscle build up. Also, salt water is excellent for assisting with speed and buoyancy while swimming. On to sinuses, I am aware of a Neti Pot. And yes, if you truly did want to spend money on one when you could get a better and more natural way, via the ocean, go ahead. Also, to clarify, salt water clears one's sinuses via nasal inhalation. It is the only way to do so naturally (meaning without such things as a Neti Pot. Now you introduce the Pacific Ocean. I am beginning to question your reasoning, based on recent references made, (i.e. sea, the sea, ocean, and now, Pacific Ocean.) If you are really that confused on the topic under debate, I suggest you re-read the title of this debate. I am confused to your statement "Even though this does happen in pools, the effects are not quite as shocking," for it comes out of nowhere with no follow up (or prior) explanation. Lastly, my statement on athlete's foot taken incorrectly, for the word daft has two meanings (one meaning stupid, and the other meaning fantastic- which I was using as comic relief. However, I understand how there could be a misconception. I do apologize to the readers. However, Con, I must hack at you for giving what looks like two paragraphs on Athlete's foot, which is not what the debate is on. This concludes. Thank you.