I feel like the Republicans are the bad guys

(1) I don't want confidence. I want verifiable facts. I also want to take into account that countries can merge their militaries. (2) There is a distinction when one doesn't agree on something in allowing it versus not allowing it. I don't want to allow it because I don't see the good of allowing it. (3) NASA has the 97% statistic which has been attacked. NASA isn't infallible. (4) What exactly should be done that isn't being done? They don't talk about environmental protection because they don't see how it is an issue for them. I hope they don't want to recklessly take out the environment, but I also think we shouldn't treat lightly removing jobs which cause a major expense in people's lives. I want to find a balance on this issue. Maybe find some way to make businesses return the environment the way they found it afterwards, or at least get a big start on that. (5) I don't understand Viagra, but I am probably against subsidizing it unless there is a serious medical reason. I am against subsidizing birth controls for general use because it's not an ideal thing. It can lead to effectively an abortion, so I would include a right of conscience to not subsidize birth controls for people against abortion. I am against birth control as a whole right now with the exception of rape victims who use it before its use would result in an abortion. I would define the start of abortion at the moment of conception. (6) http://cocaine.org... says that crack cocaine "is more commonly associated with system violence than its counterpart." So, I can understand that this is more serious, and is therefore more serious. Unless you prove this wrong, this is an alternative motive to the one you proposed, and we should assume interpretative charity on the accused. (7) Ben Carson said he wouldn't advocate for a Muslim president who went against the values of the US. That's from his original quote. Where is the quote that he wants to ban Muslims from the government? If the core of Christianity said that those dictatorships were approved upon (and they did serious evil presumably), then that would and should be a problem. If the core of the Muslim faith contradicts the values of the US (e.g. women's rights, the rights of non-Muslims, homosexuality for your side), we should be careful in considering a Muslim for president. (8) You clearly ignored my argument. Just because few people vote for them doesn't mean that what they say alienates those voters. Some of what they say does, yes. Some of what they say is also misinterpreted by the media. (9) Trump wasn't talking about Mexicans as rapists. He was talking about the illegal immigrants. He also said that some of them were good people. That was his quote. For Obama's birth certificate, who is constantly alleging this? What evidence can you show, and for how long did they do this? For Obama being a Christian and not being a Muslim, he sure gives the impression of ignoring Christians in trouble, rolling out the red carpet for Muslims, and going out of his way to criticize Christianity with the Spanish Inquisition by comparing it to ISIS at the National Prayer Breakfast (I did use the media for looking up that last part) which I guess is a Christian prayer breakfast, since the US is apparently 70.6% Christian according to Google. Not that the Spanish Inquisition was good, but I don't know if Obama's timing could have been more perfect. (10) I think Republicans want to not tax the rich so much because they look at the rich who were successful, and they think that if they give more money to that successful person, they will bring more success, translating for Republicans into more jobs. They think that taxing those good guys, though there are bad guys, isn't the ideal way to go about things. One of the founding fathers said, "The power to tax is the power to destroy." (I probably won't be able to get to the other points, so I will comment.)