If you look in the mirror and see a color, you are a racist.

My opponent has failed to present any reasonable arguments in favor of the resolution he has set out to affirm. I. My opponent fails to understand the human senses, specifically vision.My opponent believes that if you look in the mirror and see color, you are a racist. For me, if you look in the mirror and see color, you are a normal human with the sense of vision known as color vision. Now, there are some people who are colorblind [1], which is the descriptive term given to the phenomenon of color vision deficiency. There are several different levels of color blindness as well, but for the sake of this argument, I believe it's evident that my point is clear: People who look in the mirror and see color are individuals who have the common sense of vision known as color vision. [1] http://www.colourblindawareness.org...According to the definition of racist, which I provided in my previous round, one would need to look in the mirror - see his or her skin color - and then proclaim his race as the most superior race or at-least more superior than one other race. Unless someone does this, they are not really a racist in the situation given by my opponent. Merely looking in the mirror and seeing color is not enough to be deemed a racist. I will include some images to drive this point home. Here are two images of men looking at themselves in a mirror: Notice how the act of looking at oneself in the mirror is not racist. Notice how although they are seeing that they have skin colors, in this case black and white, yet are not being racist. Now, here are some images of racists: There is a major difference in these images. One can easily see that merely looking in the mirror and recognizing that your skin has color, whether it's white/black/yellow/brown/red, etc., is not enough to be deemed racist. There is a third component as well...III. IntentionThere is one thing that none of these pictures can convey - intention. For my opponents resolution to stand affirmed, he'd have to show that there was that *intention* of being racist. What I mean is that if I look in the mirror, and say, "Hey, my skin is a light brown" then would that be racist? Nope. If I had gone in there with the intention of showing someone that I'm better than dark brown skinned people, then yes, that'd be racist. That's the key though, intention. My opponent has yet to show how anyone noticing their own skin color while looking in a mirror has the intention of doing so as a racist, or to be racist. Without that key factor, my opponents case is completely destroyed and the resolution fails to be affirmed. With that, I rest my arguments, and now move on to rebuttals. IV. My opponent presented nonsensical argumentsMy opponent starts by saying that because I call myself a color, I'm .... idk not one of all a race? It's hard to understand what Pro is saying exactly. He asserts at the end of that statement that natural selection is the race of science. My opponent will need to provide proof for this claim, otherwise it stands as nothing but a baseless opinion. Furthermore, I see no relevance to this baseless opinion to the resolution at hand. My opponent needs to draw a connection between his argument and the actual resolution, otherwise it stands as a moot point and holds no ground in this debate. My opponent then asks what race am I, though it says clearly in my profile that I am Caucasian. Regardless, man or woman is not a race - so idk why my opponent gives that as a possible answer. I do not see how identifying my own skin color contradicts being a part of the human race. Also, humans are a species, not a race. Unless you are playing video games, in which case, yes, humans can be a race if there are other life forms to choose a character from. All of this is irrelevant though. In conclusion, I've presented several arguments negating the resolution. I've presented my rebuttals for the previous *opinions* shared by my opponent. I've called for Pro to provide proofs for his opinions to validate them as relevant facts that could affirm his case. As it stands, the resolution is negated. The Blood Shedder of Truth graciously returns the floor to Pro.