Cars have a negative impact on this world

I may look like i have helped Pro in being more convincing, but i do have some more refutations and contentions up my sleeve: - First of all, there's problems with city planning; we can't just place electric railways through every single suburb (or neighbourhood) in a region; it is costly to say the least, and generally the longer the work takes (or the greater the total rail length itself) the bigger the impact on the city budget. Also there's the possibility of noise pollution; sensitive persons who give aversive reactions to noise would naturally avoid lodging near train stations with perhaps thousands of commuters, acknowledging the fact that no two individuals are the same. Back on budget, electric trains are bad enough, but maglev (MAGnetic LEVitation), though quieter and faster, would be even worse. There is also the probable problem with EMP (electromagnetic pulse), which interferes with most pocket devices and other electronic equipment, thereby disrupting communication, like this, and some forms of entertainment, like the very devices we access this site from. - Second, trains ARE designed for mass transport, and so there are limits as to arrangement of track; tight kinks in railways, especially on switch junctions, would force the transport to slow down due to the danger of derailment; trains are all-too-often heavy, and the more carriages the greater the danger it would derail. And if that isn't enough, passengers' own inertia would result in discomfort for them at such points, being the "centrifugal force" that results from it. Meanwhile, done well, automobiles don't have those problems or they're at least mitigated, especially not being confined to railways on which trains can't just switch lanes at just any given time. As transport for on asphalt road, automobiles are thus more versatile which further increases their compensation for the shortcomings of trains and automobiles' own supplement of positive impact. Again, especially with the habit of carpool. - On top of all that is the problem with scheduling train routes. The lines can only accommodate so many trains at one time, most often If the routes planned by the very bodies who run the train lines don't have efficient routes, that transport mode is of less use, possibly to the point of being virtually useless. And especially if switch junctions are to be used a lot which gives a greater chance of collisions (crashes between trains). While a comparatively small community of persons could comparatively easily work out a carpool schedule of their own, at any time, for any arrangement of everyday tasks. Which we inevitably would need because we don't have infinite capacity for fatigue, i. e. , we will inevitably tire. Check out these sources - . http://transportblog.co.nz... - . http://www.magnet.fsu.edu... - . http://www.city-data.com... - . http://en.wikipedia.org... - . http://en.wikipedia.org... - . http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com... All in all, my final contention for this round is that the automobile issue is a gray area as i pointed out before, and should not be dismissed as all negative, as in fact if we begin to employ the methods of automobile transport that both Pro and i have mentioned above, it can - and will - supplement a positive impact that would more than compensate for the negative.