The Christian God As Described In the Bible Does Not Exist

Due to the fact that I only had one round to make an argument, and no rounds to refute Con's claims, I will take this round to do my refuting. I won't be annoyed if voters give a conduct point to Con for this, but I feel as though I should have a round for rebuttals."facts are those words are not even in the bible."If I say "potatoes have their roots below the surface", you can infer that that means that potatoes have their roots underground. It does not have to be explicitly worded to say that God is omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent. 1) "Psalms 147:5 clearly say's God's understanding is infinite. Facts are the bible proves it came from God because of prophecy, writing the future over 4000 years ago. There is something that God can not do. Go back on His Word! So there is the item God can not lift."Con has provided no proof that God cannot go back on his word. "That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence" -Christopher Hitchens2) "Psalms 145:17 does not say God is omnibenevolent! Facts are God hates, kills, and is jealous as well."The argument presented here does nothing but shows how contradictory the Bible is. Is God good? Or is God evil? I can't tell by reading the Bible.3) "The bible says the eyes of the Lord are in everyplace means simply that God's has many angels who's eyes are everywhere. So my opponent is wrong about God three times over" This argument doesn't change the fact that the superpositions are always being observed. All it does is change who is observing them. Con's argument does nothing to my claim. 4) "How did God know Damascus would be destroyed in a 65 year period? Israel regathered as a nation 1948 do the math."Where is Israel mentioned in Isaiah 7:8?5) "How did God fortell Gaza being destroyed."There has been war in the Middle East for thousands of years. Of course Gaza would eventually be destroyed. 6) "The bible say's parts of Israel will be destroyed along with Gaza. These nations named in this verse, are the location of Israel's Iron Domes. Will Israel be attacked by Islam who want to push them into the sea?"This isn't exactly a novel idea. Who in the Middle East doesn't want to push Israel into the sea?7) "Cain went to the land of Nod and took a wife. Adam and Eve were not the first people on earth. The bible say's God created people in Genesis 1:26 and Adam was formed in Genesis 2:7 the man to til the ground. Notice the named nations in Genesis 2."This doesn't disprove my point about Adam and Eve not being able to have children. "And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made."So the most powerful being in the universe had to rest after a six day work week?8) "The bible and science agree, the earth is millions of years old. The bible is a record of the second earth age, while declaring the future. The third earth age where Christ rules this earth. Science at one time thought the earth was flat, God knew better."First off, science never thought the earth was flat. Science cannot have an opinion. Science is just the study of everything around us. Nobody would say that math once thought something. Also, Con provided no evidence that any scientist ever thought the earth was flat. "It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth"CIRCLES ARE FLATThe earth is a sphere, not a circle. I guess God didn't take basic geometry in school. Therefore, if God is real, he was wrong. This negates his omniscience. Now we have learned that god is neither omnipotent, omnibenevolent, nor omniscient. What exactly are you worshiping such a weak being for?"My opponent seems to be repeating Christian dogma. Anyone who has actually read the bible with understanding, would know that Christians do not follow God or the bible."From my understanding, Christians follow Christ. Christ = God. Therefore Christians follow God. If you are a Christian that does not believe Jesus is God, this religion suits you better: (http://en.wikipedia.org...). Con has dropped a lot of of my arguments: Big bang, Incest, Humans Not Having Free Will, God's Creator. Con also "disproved" some my paradoxes by claiming God is neither omniscient, omnipotent, nor omnibenevolent. If God is none of these three, then there is no reason to believe that he exists.