Evolution is proven to occur

I'm looking forward to round 3, but first I must start with an important definition. Proven: to show the existence, truth, or correctness of (something) by using evidence, logic, etc. [1] Notice that all the previous evidence and logic I listed went unrefuted, and Con himself even said: "The theory of evolution being valid or invalid is not the question for this debate" Con simply refused to debate any of my evidence or logic he went far off-topic. In addition he also failed to understand what a scientific theory is. 1. A scientific theory You said: " 'everything' in science is just a theory and is, nor can be proven " This is innacurate, in fact just so you can fully understand the definition of a scientific theory is I will list a source that attempts to explain it to the public, and use some quotes. [2] This is coming from live science "A theory must include statements that have observational consequences. A good theory, like Newton"s theory of gravity, has unity, which means it consists of a limited number of problem-solving strategies that can be applied to a wide range of scientific circumstances. Another feature of a good theory is that it formed from a number of hypotheses that can be tested independently. A scientific theory is not the end result of the scientific method; theories can be proven or rejected, just like hypotheses. Theories can be improved or modified as more information is gathered so that the accuracy of the prediction becomes greater over time." Here's more info "When used in non-scientific context, the word "theory" implies that something is unproven or speculative. As used in science, however, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Any scientific theory must be based on a careful and rational examination of the facts. In the scientific method, there is a clear distinction between facts, which can be observed and/or measured, and theories, which are scientists" explanations and interpretations of the facts. Scientists can have various interpretations of the outcomes of experiments and observations, but the facts, which are the cornerstone of the scientific method, do not change." From chemistry.com "A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it." [3] From ncse.com "Theory: In science, a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses." [4] I'm willing to admit a scientific theory has some room in it's definition for change in all deifnitions I listed, and the wikipedia definition you listed. I'll also allow the voters to decide which side they think is most appropaite for this debate instead of just saying your data is wrong/innacurate. 2. About the bats/microevolution You said: "What it may prove is that many observations are consistently concluding that white bats are preyed upon with more frequency than black bats. " Yes this would simply be more evidence/proof for evolution, since the black bats would more sucsessfully pass their traits on the next generation. Also, the scientists/biologists would observe and record evidence for evolution, honestly it seems as though you're aiding my argument. 3. The idea of the supernatural/a god causing changes has no proof to back it up, while evolution does. It was funny seeing your source with multiple 1970's quotes from Karl Popper but they have little to do with this debate. I read your source and it said: "neither Darwin nor any Darwinian has so far given an actual causal explanation of the adaptive evolution of any single organism" You using this to support your argument shows shows just how out of date that argument is, I listed alot of evidence for macroevolution in round 2 and you even said: "The theory of evolution being valid or invalid is not the question for this debate" 4. Closing Statement: The statement "Evolution is proven to occur" is accurate, and proven via vast amounts of evidence, logic, etc. Sources: [1] http://www.merriam-webster.com... [2] http://www.livescience.com... [3] http://chemistry.about.com... [4] http://ncse.com...