Black Lives Matter, New Black Panthers, et al are more dangerous to the USA than ISIS

1. My opponent by default has forfeited. The rules were to accept this debate in round 1. He did not. I offered a negotiation in round 2 with the stipulation he accept or resign. He did not accept. It is impossible to fairly debate a topic when only 1 person agrees to the ground rules. As the instigator, the burden falls on me, making this an impossible feat vs another who is not in acceptance of the ground rules and is unwilling to even compromise after the Round 1 objection. For that reason alone, anyone reading this debate needs to seriously consider voting in a manner that disqualifies my opponent. 2. My opponent shall object to the above, since he cannot accept the organization called Black Lives Matter, that states on their website is an organization, is an organization. This type of willful ignorance and lack of basic understanding of the issue must seriously cloud any of his points in this debate. 3. My opponent has used fallacies to attempt to undermine my facts. He poisons the well claiming any information I post is inaccurate because of the sources conservative roots. HOWEVER he does nothing to show the source is reporting inaccurate information, nor does he attempt to counter the facts with his own sourced information. His only objection are based on fallacies and prejudice. His position is clearly at best bad taste, and at worst a losing position. And his links have nothing to do with supporting his postition. Some of his links don't even work. 4. To bullet 3 above, he implies conservative media is unable to report the truth. He backs this up with links to liberal media outlets such as LAtimes. Mainstream media is also as biased. It spoon-feeds s a narrative about BLM and the black culture. 5. EXAMPLE: The reported and reapeated lies about BLM supporter who ran people over on the Las Vegas strip reported a "homeless woman" first on CNN. As friends who spoke with the famly spokes person on facebook wrote " this will probably help her out" in the long run to draw sympathy or a cover story for "why". 6. The family spokeswoman on DEC 21 1:17pm "Stupid CNN she"s not homeless. " . https://www.facebook.com... The MSM is just as biased as it reports lies. Do you no longer consider CNN a valid source? No, but information must be backed up or disproven not just pushed aside as my opponent is attempting to do. I am not attempting to discredit CNN I am posting alternative information. My opponent has made no attempt to challenge my information. He has only attacked my source. A fallacy, a losing position 7. My opponent attempts to discredit FBI. GOV source because he does not like the data stating 50% of all murders are committed by black people. He attempts to discredit it by stating it is from 2012 not realizing 2012 is the most recently published data AND he is unable to show 2012 is an annomoly. Every year 12% of the US population is responsible for for 50% of the murders. He is unable to disprove the fact so he attempts to discredit the source. A fallacy, a losing position. 8. My opponent attempts do distance BLM from the FBI facts because it looks bad. He claims there is no correlation between BLM and other leftist black organizations, those who support them, and black violence. At a black lives rally Reporter threatened by on public grounds outside. Another, what do we want dead cops, when do we want it? Now. . Does anyone else remember "Pigs in a blanket, fry em like bacon"? And this video of the NPB, armed walking streets wearing bullet proof vests chanting death threats to cops? 2 cops were shot execution style while eating lunch in Las Vegas as the black murdered shouted "This is a revolution". . http://www.usatoday.com... 9. It is impossible to believe the rhetoric openly discussed about killing cops is not responsible for the actions and motivations of a single of the 4000 murders. My opponent has evidence to refute my points, he attacks the sources. A fallacy, a losing position. 10. My opponent is unable to address #F**KPARIS with the repeated posts on twitter that are anti American, anti police, anti white, and call for a black uprising against white and those in power. Want to know the end game? #F**KPARIS is all you need to know. 11. My opponent does not see the danger of taking over an airport terminal. Does nothing to support his claim except voice an opinion. Do you agree with him that a group at the direction of BLM taking over a portion of an airport is NOT dangerous? Do you not think when the group at the direction of BLM takes over a mall that is not dangerous or alter your rights or effect your way of life? At what point does BLM become dangerous? My opponent would probably side with never. Is that the position you are taking? 12. BLM website stated a goal of disrupting commerce. And they were successful. Your jobs and your rights. How is this NOT dangerous? His attempt to dispute my point is with broken links. .. see: . https://www.splcenter.org... Who do you agree with? ISIS has done nothing in the US. Radicalized muslims have killed fewer people in the past 10 years than have drowned in 5 gallon buckets. Isis has not disrupted your holiday shopping, stopped you from driving in roads, and does not have the followers in the US to act on the statements. ISIS didn"t set fire to Ferguson or Baltimore. ISIS isn"t kllling cops. ISIS isn"t successfully taking away your right to be free. MY opponent has no answer to #F**KPARIS, to the statements of BLM supporters calling to assassinate TRUMP, cops, or white people other than fallacies and personal opinions. His only defense is with Falacies and opinions - a losing debate position.