CHIPS should be allowed to be taught in classes.

Thanks, ill be replying to all those points. R1: Everyone is born straight Pro has mis-interpreted what I meant when I said that everyone is born straight. What I meant was the everyone is born with the features to make us have children. This can only happen with a man and women, whether it be by sex or egg freezing or whatever. Also, gay is seen as a secondary option or a alternative. This is why naturally you are attracted to the opposite sex. You have to choose to be gay, not to be straight. Pro ended by saying that CHIPS is not able to make a child gay. When did I say that it did. Also, I may say later on, the impact it could have at such a young age could put too much power onto the child becoming gay. 1a. CHIPS fosters gay kids Pro mentions about how kids can be more comfortable around gay people and won't develop hostile behavior against kids from a gay background. However, how will they learn to be gay people. How will you be able to tell how a gay person acts like. And as far as i'm concerned, the only thing they are likely to do is kiss. Any other way could be seen as judging how gay people act. Every couple acts differently, so how can you define how every single one acts. Also, even before they have these CHIPS lessons, they are likely to not know whats going on because if a reception or Year 1 child was to see 2 males flirting I don't think that they will now that it is un-frequent. They won't be able to grasp that what they are doing is mostly frowned upon but rather see as just 2 people making love. In-fact, there is a chance that these couple may be seen differently at a young age and being pointed out by these young children. When Pro mention on how CHIPS want to show that there is no need in suppressing kids that want to play gay. This once again shows my point that they are too young to understand the subject. Most times its the parents that control their actions and even then the kids won't understand whats wrong with the parents. Your example ending also has a problem. You say that they are twisting a harmless story. The suicides would have something to say about that. The problem with most pro-CHIPS arguments are that they think that everything will work out fine if they are taught young. Problem? Too young. 1b: Gay kids are bullying victims What do you mean gay is not a choice. You choose to be different from the average person. The only reason reason we are here is because of a man a woman. You choose to go against that and it make it a choice. Why would kids at the ages of 4-6 need to know about homophobia. What is it's use to them. They are being taught something way to early. It won't have a big effect on them. And the chance are when they go home and tell there parents what they learnt on that day the parents will replace it with their views since they are too young to fully understand. 1c: Being gay is dangerous and negative Once again, pro has taken may words and twisted it in a pretzel and changed the complete complexion of it. I am saying that being gay can mean peoples opinions and views on you will change. Pro is coming close to relating it to choosing a rival football team to support, where only a little difference changes. Being gay can mean that people completely act opposite to the way they used to hang around you. Also, the repetition of gay not being a choice is starting to frustrate me. It is away form the normal. You choose to go against the average choice. This is why people may ask someone: " Are you gay?", rather than: "Are you straight?" It's more like those who choose to be gay to those who go against China's dictatorship. They choose to stand up while everyone ignores, and some people will love them for the choice, and some will hate them. It happens. MAIN POINT: Just way too young. This is being seen as something easy to understand and teach. The review says that along with learning to read and write, children in their Reception year at school should be taught about the sexual orientation of 1.1% of the population of the UK who identify themselves as lesbian or gay. Why at reception. It just makes no sense. They do not fit. Why push children in reception in such a big issue when they are still learning how to read and write. I don't think that gay-friendly behavior should be taught next to the bear necessity of writing, reading, English, Science and Maths needed in everyday life. Bullying as a whole can be as it is much simpler and frowned upon more and happens more. Take the right priority when it comes to a young kid. Conclusion: Overall, I think that although CHIPS isn't that bad of a programme, I still think that the audience is wrong. It's like teaching a E grade student A* work. It is too complicated for some of their age. It should at least be kept away from them. We shouldn't plant opinions into the minds of those who won't understand it. It will end up going horribly wrong. Oh, and being gay is a choice.