Every human is equal

I am quite aware that my definitions are crap. Still, why must you loophole them? I mentioned in my first post of round one "All humans are equal no matter what religion, political preferences, gender, sexual preferences, employment, personal preferences, ethnicities, ect." What does this have to do with the amount of skin someone has? "I'll assume that PRO plans on defending against all persons and any form of inequality" well Nails, you assumed wrong. Besides how obviously you copied from Wikipedia or from some other source of text, each argument you bring up is preposterous. After your strange and plagiarized skin argument, you bring up examples of horrid people from our past. We humans view people in a very loose code: good, or bad. Of course many other words can be described of how we think of a person, but this is the basic set of words we learned at an early age to link to its meaning. If you see a man snatching a woman's purse we assume he is "bad". If we see a firefighter save a baby from a burning building, we assume he is "good". However, this is the way a human's brain was taught to learn. Unless you are some never-aging extra-terrestrial (your profile says otherwise so I assume you're not) you did not state why they had done what they did. The man who stole the purse could have stolen it because it was his girlfriend's to begin with. The firefighter could have set the fire and tortured the infant. Noone knows every detail about the past, including you and I. Next up: your argument that the dead are not treated equally to a human. Hmmm....... a dead person. That means a person who is not living and their life is over. If I go into a graveyard and preen open a coffin I do not see a human. I see a pile of filthy bones. Here is a definition of a human that you so rudely asked for: can also vary greatly (e.g. obesity). Unlike most other primates, humans are capable of fully bipedal locomotion, thus leaving their arms available for manipulating objects using their hands, aided especially by opposable thumbs. Although they are similar compared to other primates, with notable hair growth occurring chiefly on the top of the head, underarms and pubic area, the average human has more hair follicles on his or her body than the average chimpanzee. The main distinction is that human hairs are shorter, finer, and less heavily pigmented than the average chimpanzee's, thus making them harder to see.[46] The hue of human skin and hair is determined by the presence of pigments called melanins. Human skin hues can range from very dark brown to very pale pink. Human hair ranges from white to brown to red to most commonly black.[47] This depends on the amount of melanin (an effective sun blocking pigment) in the skin and hair, with hair melanin concentrations in hair fading with increased age, leading to grey or even white hair. Most researchers believe that skin darkening was an adaptation that evolved as a protection against ultraviolet solar radiation. However, more recently it has been argued that particular skin colors are an adaptation to balance folate, which is destroyed by ultraviolet radiation, and vitamin D, which requires sunlight to form.[48] The skin pigmentation of contemporary humans is geographically stratified, and in general correlates with the level of ultraviolet radiation. Human skin also has a capacity to darken (sun tanning) in response to exposure to ultraviolet radiation.[49][50] Humans tend to be physically weaker than other similarly sized primates, with young, conditioned male humans having been shown to be unable to match the strength of female orangutans which are at least three times stronger.[51] Constituents of the human body In a person weighing 60 kg Constituent Weight [52] Percentage of atoms [52] Oxygen 38.8 kg 25.5% Carbon 10.9 kg 9.5% Hydrogen 6.0 kg 63.0% Nitrogen 1.9 kg 1.4% Other 2.4 kg 0.6% Humans have proportionately shorter palates and much smaller teeth than other primates. They are the only primates to have short, relatively flush canine teeth. Humans have characteristically crowded teeth, with gaps from lost teeth usually closing up quickly in young specimens. Humans are gradually losing their wisdom teeth, with some individuals having them congenitally absent.[53] The deceased, since no longer actually ABLE to do anything, aren't debated on for rights considering there....well....should I spell it out for you? D-E-A-D! Children, honestly, are not given all the rights adults are granted. Children are not allowed to vote because their brain is not fully developed to comprehend the decision of whose name to put down on a ballet. Children cannot consume alcoholic beverages because, again, their brain is not fully developed. (By the way, isn't alcohol not exactly a good right to be given to? It is basically like drinking bottles of faint poison.) Parents ARE allowed to control their children, but to a certain extent. Parents are not allowed to lock their children up and throw bricks at them, but since a child has not (yet again) developed mentally they really can't care for themselves. Parents are given the right to feed, live, comfort, educate, and do more things with their children. I have never met a child who complained about their parents feeding them, or cry about being not able to boss themselves around to bathe reguraly. Your next point I feel very disgusted to speak about, considering you said "my" slave, and not "a" slave. Bigotry aside, your argument is invalid. What I am saying is that a slave owner, or in this cause "you" are entirely equal to this slave you speak about. "You" just don't act like he is because of his skin. Here is a quote from Chief Standing Bear "This hand is not the color of yours, but if I pierce it I will feel pain. If you pierce your hand, u will also feel pain. The blood that will flow from mine will be the same color as yours". This is an excellent reason as why humans are equal. But I digress. And again you mention an argument totally irrelevant to the list I wrote down in my first post. Ha. Your second source is a strange source you led me to and it was not very helpful. The other links you gave kind of defended your argument and were decent, but I was puzzled as to why you gave me links to some man who gobbles down 20,000 calories a day and a beyond under-fed child. I am looking forward to your next post, but please don't waste my time by typing up loopholes.