Kalam Sucks Butt

False rebuttal I. The chief concernThis is a false dichotomy. God creating the universe is simultaneous with theBig Bang and causation. Time as we know it is more than sequential events, it is a physical dimension. It is this physical dimension that began with the universe. Eternity would still have sequential events, but it is simply not time as we know it. In this sense there can be a cause before the time of our universe. False rebuttal II. The fallacy of equiovcationYour first example can be overriden by arguments for the finitude of the past. And the second example seems to be an accidental generalization like "Human beings have always lived in this solar system" and not metaphysicallytrue. Begin is just to come into being. It doesn't matter if its ex materal or ex nihlo. Everything in the universe has a relational attribute of the conservation. Due to conservation and post reaction everything must be caused. Post reaction is talking about a beginning in a pre cause sense. We see a post reaction com intro in the early universe. Meaning there must be a pre cause or pre causal relations in order to simulate the universe's existence (1). There was a state of affairs where the universe had a causeal law, therefore there must be a cause because the second the universe is in existence a causal effect is in existence. The cause must be God already provenFailed rebuttal III. Problems with the first premiseFirst, his response assumes Quantum physics. That is false. QP can't handel the observations of Aero space particles. They spin in a way contradicting the prediction of QP. I know a lot about QP to disprove it. I have a huge understanding of Quantum Physics so much I know its false. The causes of radioactive decay are part of your Quantum Physics. For example, Alpha decay is caused by an Alpha particle repeatedly hitting a potential barrier until it tunnels through. Just because we can't find the cause of an event does not mean there was no cause. Several interpretations of Quantum Physics provide a cause for all Quantum events, and those that do not, simply do not care what the cause is. One possibility is that these events simply do not have a natural cause, but a supernatural cause as suggested by General intelligent design. In such a case, a search for a natural cause would fail to find one. But that does not mean there is no cause. The conservation of mass does support p1. Mass beig converted to energy still has a cause being traviling at a high speed or more massafied particles (according to relativity which is false (2). Again the conservation was again at the same time as the creation of the universe. These things can't exsit forever due to the whare out law. Energy can't be forever because it would ware proven by Ann Tipler's Energy tests. Philo getten onwed on IV. Problems with the second premiseFinite and beginning are the same. Something can't be finite and eternal. Its an abusredity. The a theory is correct as B theory says self refuting. B theory says time requires us to believe that our experience of change in the external world as well as within our own minds is wholly illusory. Both tenets are required to be believed if one wishes to hold to static time. However, If our changing experiences are themselves illusions, then we are experiencing a CHANGING ILLUSION, which is objective (or leads to a vicious infinite regress. Like, if that change is an illusion, then something's causing that illusion, and that illusion, and that illusion). Therefore, the static theory of time is self-contradictory, therefore its wrong, and, therefore THE UNIVERSE HAS A CAUSE. Philo goes about how a theory refutes God. God is outside of time and therefore he can exist within it. Philo crying on V. The strangeness of the universePhilo says Kalam sucks butt because the universe is strange. Wow lets say other things like this. The universe is strange therefore Philos response to this is false. Philo doesn't exist its all in my head why because the universe is strange! QP is false anyway. None of this destroys the Kalam. The Kalam doesnt' suck butt because it succeds Its the ultimate argument no one can destroy it! God exists is fact of science more and more scientists are accepting this fact!Vote me(1) http://www.space.com... (2) http://conservapedia.com...