It's time to send all Western Muslims back to the Middle East

I will start of the last round of this debate, my countering a few of my opponent's arguments; "And a quotation from their infallible leader who was divinely "inspired by God" and created the entire construct of their religion. If they aren't adhering to what Muhammed actually said, that would be "not being a Muslim". Is there some so named Muslim" somewhere who ignores Muhammed? Sure. But with nearly 2 billion adherents, if most believe Muhammed, and they do, then his teaching is law to nearly 2 billion people." Yes, but in every religion, various quotations are not meant to be taken absolutely literally. Most of Islam does not support every little bit of the Quaran. There are bits and pieces of every religion that are to be taken metaphorically rather than absolutely literally. Your point is once again incorrect, as you are ignorantly regarding every bit of information in the Quaran as fact of what Islam believes in. Also, the last time I checked, we have freedom of belief and thought in the west, as long as no one is physically harmed in the process. Western Muslims are not going around murdering others, in the west. "Not in the New Testament, and the Old Testament isn't where Christians get their teachings on life from. (Jesus) It's a logical and theological fallacy. Christians do not sacrifice animals because Jesus said not to. Muslims do sacrifice animals because Muhammed said to." This is yet another incorrect statement. In the New Testament, it specifically states that all non-believers will be crushed when Jesus re-appears on the Earth. This seems to be not overly indifferent from your ignorant image of Islam. Once again, your point proves to be only a stretched opinionated statement. "I was raised in Islam. They don't " believe it's a different era." They are here in the U.S. believing and being taught in the mosques: 1)The end is near. 2)The world will be conquested and ruled fully by Islam at the time of the end, and the time to take over the West, per a religious fatwah, is now. Commanded world domination is a fundamental and core part of Islam." This is possibly the falsest thing you've said for the entirety of the debate. I really don't know where you got this, but it is not from the Quaran. Nowhere does it specifically (or even non-specifically) state that Muslims have a desire to take over the world. This is not the philosophy of Islam. This is racism as a whole. My opponent has failed, during the entirety of this debate, to provide any legitimate facts about the 'evils' of Islam. I suppose in my opponent's mind, he thinks that Muslims have some sort of plan that they're all in on: that they apparently want to take over the world. This is complete and utter nonsense. My opponent is now resorting to nonsensical insults of Islam, due to the fact that there is no legitimate point to make against it. The end is near thing my opponent apparently believes was also stated, could be even sillier. Maybe this is somewhere in the Church of Scientology, but this is not Islam. "'Dr. Mudar Zahran, defined himself as an "orthodox Muslim." He says there"s a "genuine problem with Muslims in Europe" and calls the current wave of migrants entering the continent "the soft Islamic conquest of the West." This is the second wave of jihad. Jihad is a systematic process that gradually takes you over from the inside and the outside, infiltrating your system and people, then closing around it violently from the inside and the outside once it has the power to do so. Example: If a future U.S. President were a Muslim and deleted the 2nd Amendment, once an ambush by Muslims was executed, he could have the military stand down per executive order, and Americans would have no armed defense against Islamic militants. That is how Islam works. '" Firstly, TheNewAmerican can hardly be considered a reliable source of information. Secondly, this is yet another bizzare statement. I honestly don't know who this Dr. Zahran is, but I can guarantee you he represents a microscopic part of Islam. He can consider himself how he wants to,, but the vast majority of Muslims (so vast in fact, it's almost an understatement to consider it this) do not believe in anything like this. I don't know where this foolishness comes from, but it is nothing but absurd and tangled reasoning. Western Muslims have no belief in the inflicting of pain and trouble upon other fellow-westerners. "Yusuf al-Qaradawi is an Egyptian Islamic scholar. He is currently the host of Al Jazeera's most popular show, "Shariah and Life," and, largely because of this, has become a very influential force among Muslims worldwide. Al-Qaradawi also serves as chairman of the board of trustees at the Islamic American University, a subsidiary of the Muslim American Society and speaks in the United States regularly. And I quote: "What remains, then, is to conquer Rome. The second part of the omen. "The city of Hiraq (once emperor of Constantinople) will be conquered first", so what remains is to conquer Rome.' This means that Islam will come back to Europe for the third time, after it was expelled from it twice. Conquest through Da'wa (proselytizing), that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da'wa.'" On the contrary, Yusuf al-Qaradawi has received plenty of controversy for making these kinds of statements from Muslims and Non-Muslims alike. Al-Qaradawi does not hold the sort of influence over Islam you claim him to have. I would also like to remind my opponent, that this man is a television personality. As I'm sure we both know, television personalities are known for making controversial statements in order to gain popularity. While I can perhaps see what you are trying to say, it remains incorrect. "I thought about posting a youtube video of a young girl being mutilated against her will, screaming, being held down, and bleeding wildly, but was unsure whether or not it violated the terms of service on DDO. A simple youtube search will yield the results." I am once again reminding my opponent that the majority of Islam does not support this kind of thing. I have not heard of any part of it that does. In fact, it has been modernized to be performed surgically and painlessly. I would like to finish off the debate my thanking my opponent for participating, and with a few closing statements. Throughout every era and every generation, man has feared the arrival of another group. It has formerly included the Irish and Judaism. They arrived, escaping their respective nations, and people continuously feared them. However, has any harm occurred in the west due to new ethnic groups arriving? No. There has been no increase in any negative virtues of society in the west, save racism. The one thing that consistently holds up during these periods are racism. Racism is defined as "hatred or intolerance of another race or other races." But what are the routes of racism? Well, it consists of both the fear of change and the laziness to learn more about others. This is how racism is formed. It has been repeated over and over again throughout history. It needs to stop immediately. More diversity brings beauty and uniqueness to the west. This is what we need. We don't need to push each other out, or possess hatred for others for no legitimate reason, we need to change. As long as racism exists, we will be further and further away from political correctness. Additionally, my opponent's entire argument goes against the American Constitution. But furthermore, we need to find a way to achieve peace in our society. My opponent's ideology, is not the correct way to do so. http://www.dictionary.com... Thank you.