Macro Evolution is supported by evidence.

Thermodynamics in regard to complex biological systems. "This argument does not apply to biology. One grows up and becomes more complex, but that does not make sense if the thermodynamics argument is true! -Pro"Under certain special conditions (not available to evolution, as far as all evidence goes), the organization of an open system may be increased for a time by the entrance of external ORDERING energy, or information. Examples would be the growth of a plant from a seed or the construction of a building from various structural components. Any such growth process, however, must have a directing program (such as the genetic code in the DNA of the seed or the blueprint for the building), as well as an energy conversion mechanism of some sort to convert the raw energy of the solar heat into the specific work of building up the structure (such as the amazingly complex mechanism of photosynthesis for the seed, or the machinery, fuels, muscles, and minds of the builders in the case of the building). The imaginary evolutionary growth of complex plants and animals from a primeval cell (and THAT from nonliving chemicals in a hypothetical primordial soup), however, has neither a directing program nor conversion mechanism to accomplish this. It must rely on time and chance, but time and chance break things down - they don't build them up. -Henry M Morris "Science and the Bible" Lactose "Tolerance" - I was absolutely WRONG when I said; "everyone was ORIGINALLY lactose tolerant." In fact, the OPPOSITE is true! "For many years, lactose intolerance was regarded as abnormal, and was used by many as evidence of human evolution. As a measure of evolutionary “advancement”, milk-drinking seemed to fit the stereotype perfectly." "However, “lactose deficiency” in adults is not in fact abnormal, but the norm! Research has shown that the gene for lactase normally switches off as children are weaned. And a genetic mutation that results in lactase production not being switched off accounts for the ability of certain people to drink milk into adulthood." “This is the best example of convergent evolution in humans that I’ve ever seen,” said geneticist Joel Hirschhorn, of the Children’s Hospital Boston, Massachusetts. But note that these genetic changes are not “evolution” in the uphill molecules-to-milkman sense, as the changes are downhill, i.e., information has been LOST (viz., the normal switching-off mechanism of lactase production following weaning).12 Rather, at best this is an example of selection, as Hirschhorn himself went on to acknowledge: “Lactase persistence has always been a textbook example of selection, and now it’ll be a textbook example in a totally different way.”10 "So, those of you who are unable to drink milk as adults today without feeling nauseous (or worse) can take heart from being closer in that respect to the originally “physically-perfect” first man and woman than are those of us who are milk-drinking “mutants”!" http://creation.com... 12 Wieland, C., The evolution train’s a-comin’ (Sorry, a-goin’—in the wrong direction), Creation 24(2):16–19, 2002, <creation.com/train>. 10 Check, E., How Africa learned to love the cow, Nature 444(7122):994–996, 21/28 December 2006. Transitional Fossils There are NO transitional fossils!!! All you have is bones in the dirt. You put your interpretation on them. You can not prove that those bones had children never mind children different than themselves!!! (which has NEVER been observed EVER). There are NO transitional fossils, even if there was 1 supposed transitional fossil somewhere then my opponent failed to show it. There simple are NONE. Marx, Lenin and Stalin and Hitler were ardent evolutionists. - This shows the harmful effects of evolutionary philosophy. Chernobyl Mushrooms The article states; "IT’S ALSO THE ABODE of some very hardy fungi which researchers believe aren’t just tolerating the severe radiation, but actually harnessing its energy to thrive." what's the key word in this sentence, anyone? - "BELIEVE"!!! it goes on to state; "even without melanin, many fungi are intrinsically radiation-resistant." hmmm This is simply an adaptation not "vertical" evolution. These mushrooms will never ever ever ever ever turn into mushroom MEN. Micro Vs Macro: "Microevolution is evolution below speciation level, and has been observed by Endler (1980). [5] Microevolution adds up to macroevolution.[6] Microevolution is true, then macroevolution also will be true." -Pro We obsever variation within kinds but according to fixed limits. Evolutionsist think they can get around this by assertting that the earth is "billions of years old" which it is NOT and my opponent has not even attmpted to prove it is. I will further address this in my pig argument in the conclusion. CONCLUSION: I have thoroughly and conclusively dealt with every one of my opponents arguments and shown them to be false. My opponent failed to provide even a single piece of evidence that can not be refuted. You would think that if evolution were true then there should be mountains of really good observations and data to support it, however this is just simply not the case. The theory of evolution is accepted on philosophical grounds NOT scientific. It requires belief and is therefore not science but religion. Even some secular scientists involved in this field are steadily moving away from the theory of evolution by natural selection because the evidence simply does not support it. darwin said that if his theory were true than many transitional fossils would be discovered in the future, they never were. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth… And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so…. And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good… And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so." - Genesis KJV Thus God created all the animals and plants to bring forth after their KIND. We witness variation within the kinds but according to fixed limits. As Dr Kent Hovind once said; "farmers have been breeding pigs for a loooong time but they will never breed a pig the size of Texas." Thank you for carefully considering this debate. Best Regards, Fritz Stammberger