Resolved: Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory.

Okay, I see that proving just one sub-theory will not get me anywhere in this debate, so I will proceed to prove that intelligent design [AS A WHOLE] is a scientific theory, not just subsets of 'ID.' My opponent goes on about how ID is not compatible with his theory & definition of what a 'scientific theorem' is. He went about it by this. "Supported by experimental evidence- Clearly this is an immediate fail for intelligent design. Any evidence whatsoever does not support it. Even demonstrating beyond any doubt that a legitimate theory such as evolution is totally false (which would require extraordinary amounts of proof in its self), would not make intelligent design supported by experimental evidence. This is because of the scientific burden of proof, not only do you need to show why all other theories are wrong, but you must demonstrate why the theory you are presenting explains phenomena in a better way. Evidence to suggest that an omnipotent being created the universe/earth is currently non-existent." This whole statement is false, via the use of mutual exclusion. Mutual exclusion - When two (2) theorems are carefully defined, and are the only two theorems in dispute, making them the only factors in the equation they are trying to solve. If I was able to prove the theorem of non-design, or evolution, wrong, I would, therefore, be able to confidently say the design is the only possible way we were created, due to mutual exclusion. Now, since my opponent would simply flick away this argument of mutual exclusion if I had no arguments to support the theory that evolution is false, I will now demonstrate two (2) reasons why evolution is a false theorem in this round, and explain two (2) more in my next two rounds. 1. Birds prove that the natural selection chain is utter stupidity. - The idea of natural selection sounds great when looking at it from a deer's perspective. A deer that can run the fastest & sense danger the quickest would be able to adapt more to it's surrounding environment, making the offspring more able than the last. However, if you look at the other examples of animals that evolved appendages to suit its surrounding environment, there are rather large flaws within it. The most classic example of this is how a bird evolved a wing. Darwin & his predecessors never explained why this occurred. All the species of birds with wings too small for it to fly (all of them in the beginning stages, if what Darwin said was true) would be no more adaptable to its environment than other birds with nothing. A half-sized wing is useless to a bird, and is actually what caused a species of bird (the Dodo) to become extinct. If it were no more adaptable to its environment than birds with no wings at all, why would that particular appendage keep evolving? The theorem of natural selection & evolution is that the most adaptable of one's species will survive. If a bird with the stubby wing was actually at a DISADVANTAGE, it would, according to Darwinian theory, die out. That didn't happen, and evolutionist's like us to believe that birds sprouted wings over millions of years, even though they would have died out much before then... 2. Single cell complexity - Scientists 100 years ago believed that a single cell life form was the simplest life form that there is. The theory developed was that certain conditions struck at the right time to get some molecules to combine, to create some sort of living cell, which then divided and split to create a higher life form, which then continued as a chain of events, thus causing evolution. This theory is incredibly immature, as modern day scientists, even with stunning, state of the art technology, cannot create a living cell... Scientist cannot even create a simple left-hand protein molecule. (Which is found in most to all animals). And, in effect, you can perform tests to see that evolution is wrong, and ID is right. For example: Once upon a time there was a Polonium 218 element of the family of radioactive isotopes. Polonium 218 would be classified in elementary school as being "hyperactive." It can't sit still very long. In only three minutes, half of the atoms decay into a lighter element, and in only one day it is all changed. Once upon a time there was granite rock. Granite is a very unique rock but at the same time is very common and plentiful. It can easily be found in mountain areas such as the Rocky Mountains of Colorado. Granite is easily identified by its hard crystalline structure and light color. The crystals are large enough to be easily seen with the eye. It has an interesting structure with a mixture of light-colored quartz and feldspar crystals, and darker crystals of mica and hornblende. Granite is solid and hard without cracks or seams, and it is very strong. Granite has another very unique property in that it cannot be created by scientists. It is considered to be an "original" material in the Earth. When melted and allowed to harden, it does not return to the original granite crystalline structure. The new smaller crystalline material is called rhyolite. Granite cannot be made by cooling the initial molten materials. This is very important, so remember this fact. Granite never contains fossils such as are found in sedimentary rocks. All of these properties have led many scientists to refer to granite as a creation rock, since it could not have solidified from molten material according to the evolutionary theory. Evolution cannot explain the presence of granite in its present structure. And where is this granite? Everywhere. Granite is the bedrock shell which encloses the entire Earth. Its exact thickness is unknown, but scientists have speculated that it forms a layer about 4.35 miles (7 km) thick, and in some areas possibly 20 miles (32 km) thick. It occurs on every continent. These are the two friends from day one. We know they were friends because they lived together. The Polonium 218 lived only a very short time (3 minutes), but he left his mark on his friend, granite, in that short time. Polonium emitted alpha particles which left a very distinct mark in the granite. These marks are called Polonium halos. These halos are tiny colored concentric circles which must be viewed with a microscope. The concentric circles are actually concentric spherical marks which appear as circles after the rock is cut open. "How many halos are there?" you may ask. One trillion times 10 billion are present on every continent around the world. They are everywhere. The Polonium 218 was the parent radioactive isotope because other distinct halos which are created by other isotopes are not present. The Polonium halos are not accompanied by Uranium 238 halos. One minute there was nothing. The next minute there were parent Polonium 218 radioactive atoms locked in the center of solid granite. The granite rock could not have formed from cooling molten rock. Granite will not form that way. In fact, scientists cannot make granite by any method. They can make diamonds but not granite. Granite is solid. The Polonium could not penetrate existing granite because it is not porous or cracked. This was day one. These friends are absolute scientific proof that evolution is dead. First, the granite could not have been produced by evolutionary theories, the Earth cooling, etc. Second, the Polonium locks the entire time period into an instantaneous event proved by nuclear chemistry. The time is not "millions and millions and millions" of years. The granite was produced as a solid with the Polonium parent elements inside at that instant. Within the first three minutes, half of the Polonium had decayed into a lower element. The Earth, granite and Polonium were created by God together in an instant. It is the precursor of life, these two friends; and they disprove the theory of evolution... I will further evaluate in my next two rounds...