Evolution Unites those of Faith and Atheists

” I will refer to this overview as the Darwinian monkey debate. In fact “evolutionary theory” is old school relative to the constructal law (the physical law of evolution) discovered in 1996 by Adrian Bejan (. http://www.tandfonline.com...). On a comparative scenario, what Einstein did to Newton, Bejan has done to Darwin; the evolution of understanding evolution. Con mentioned “young-earth creationist. ” Only if those “young-earth” folks use a little science known as time dilation (. https://en.wikipedia.org...). With this time relative relationship, they can map their Biblical seven day creation argument of one timeframe or their 10,000 year argument of another (. https://en.wikipedia.org...), into billions of years to satisfy the timeframe of current science, the timeframe argued by the faithless; case closed. Such insights are small movements in time, “baby steps,” becomes the “evolution unites those of faith and atheist” concerning evolution. On the topic of time, let's consider a Generational Time unit (gt) is about thirty years (. https://en.wikipedia.org...). Measuring time in “gt” units, highlights the functional relationship of the “Generation Gap” (. https://en.wikipedia.org...) being part of cultural evolution. In terms of this unit of time, the age of the US is approximately 8.0gts (1776, Declaration of Independence). Cultural evolution according to Adrian Bejan stated in his book “Design in Nature” (. https://www.amazon.com...): “Good ideas travel and persist. They keep on traveling. This is why culture is a constructal design [the constructal law]—a tapestry of morphing linkages in our minds and on the globe—all superimposed on the same area (the globe) and in the same volume (the brain). As such, culture is the same kind of design as the tapestry of vascular architectures, animate and inanimate, all superimposed on the Earth's surface. ” The point Bejan made concerning “vascular architectures” is best illustrated in the following short presentation from the science series “Through the Wormhole”: (. http://www.youtube.com...). Relative to “good ideas” embracing cultural evolution over time, it was only 13.3gts ago during the Dark Ages where some dominant European church (Catholicism) incarcerated Galileo (. http://newsroom.ucla.edu...) and others. Through religious reformation (aka evolution) Catholicism no longer incarcerates scientists, torture for heresy, etc. Such cultural evolution aligns the faithful with the moral conduct of today's faithless, an empirical data point where “evolution unites those of faith and atheist. ” In fact, many Catholic churches are closing their doors today. Is Christianity dying? It seems the Christian faithful are evolving from gothic rituals to singalong gatherings orchestrated by charismatic leaders. Con stated, “Science and religion often seem locked in an omnipresent ideological conflict, one which is inevitable considering the fundamental differences of the two worldviews. ” In the example relative to Catholicism, over the last 13.3grs the magnitude of this “ideological conflict” no longer includes incarceration of scientists, torture for heresy, etc. a clear direction towards “evolution unites those of faith and atheist,” not some “lock” (unchanging) being “omnipresent. ”On the faith side of those “two worldviews,” the faithful believes God, or some Deity, created the universe and everything in it, which includes the physical laws of nature. Therefore, those laws of nature are simply the handwriting of God. Following this induction, the scientific method becomes the reading of God's handwriting. On the other hand, man is known to be fallible, prudent caution is served when following philosophies of past ages or studying man's written scriptures about the Divine. One may misinterpret of what God wants; therefore, God gets—and, in some cases, God help us all—resulting in “Death, Tyranny, or the pursuit of Failure” going against the “Golden Rule” (. http://www.iep.utm.edu...), an outgrowth of “unalienable Rights”— the animate interpretation of the constructal law (. http://www.westernfreepress.com...). And for those of faith, immorally going against God's handwriting. Whether these laws of nature were created by God or not, is a debate between the claims of the faithful and the faithless. While both parties enjoy the benefits of science, the search for those laws are independent of their debate. The search for those laws recently found evolution to be a physical law of nature (aka the constructal law). From this discovery, it will be a matter of generational time where “evolution unites those of faith and atheist,” over the law of evolution shifting their future God debate to events before the Big Bang. At the Big Bang event, because evolution is part of the laws of thermodynamics, the “Big” represents pure energy, where the “Bang” is the constructal law mechanics representing the universal scope of evolution. A universal scope of evolution that “unites those of faith and atheist” on so many agreeable levels; the evolution of automobiles, smart phones, the internet, medical, food production, cultural, etc. are all manifestations of the constructal law. On the other hand, there remains this dysfunctional thread running through the fabric of society lamenting over the Darwinian monkey debate. In generational time this monkey debate will eventually subside. Going forward in time also captured the science fiction imagination in the popular “Planet of the Apes” production, where future monkeys struggled over the same debate, while humans journey amongst the stars. Even in this imaginative scenario, represents a universal implied cycle of “evolution unites those of faith and atheist” over the subject of evolution ad infinitum. One may wonder about such scenario, when the science fiction of past ages became today's reality. The subtle point of this debate, and why I selected the Category of Education is planting seeds in cyberspace for those who focus on education, to wonder if society could be served better by changing the vantage point from the classical argument of evolution. Such change may reduce the tension between those “two worldviews,” and the diversity of stresses found in other ideologies who lag in reformation, embracing civility taking civil society to new levels moving further from the Dark Ages, expediting cultural evolution in the drive to make this world a better place to live.