The US polecis and action AGAINST CUBA ARE WRONG

For starters:-Batista Vs. CastroThe US supported Batista because he was powerful. His American-Friendly Regime being in power kept Communism out of Latin America. Keeping Batista in power meant the security of the population of all of America (North and South.) This proved to be the case after Castro took power. The US also had interests in Cuba, and Batista was friendly with those interests. Anyone who views things realistically understands the importance of maintaining national interests. Only a fool would dangerously ignore national interests out of a sense of childish innocence.(1)The problem with Castro was that he was Communist. His success in Cuba was spreading. Che Guevara, who helped in Cuba, began moving into South American nations. The US begin it's embargo when Cuba formed ties with the Soviet Union. This alliance the USSR now held in the middle of America was dangerous, and a threat to US stability in the region.So what was the difference in Batista and Castro? Castro was a threat.-Harm to the PeopleThe new Cuban government has led to more oppressive laws than Batista. This is likely because Batista sought to keep the US friendly with him. The Embargo has actually helped the Cuban People. Review the bottom example:The Embargo has removed a combined $1 trillion from Cuba since it begun.(2)At Cuban Corporate Tax Rates alone , that is a Government loss of around $300,000,000,000 in taxes.(3)That $300,000,000,000 would have been used to further oppress the Cuban people over the years.The issue with fueling the economy of Communist Nations and Dictatorships is that the money never hits the bottom (the poor people.) It's rapidly taxed and removed from the economy and into the hands of the Military. It doesn't get used for hospitals, or schools, or welfare... It's removed and kept by the nation's Military, and is used often to opress the People.Instead of aiding poor Cubans, he'd only further aid their Oppression, and support the rise of a Communist power in Central America.-Support of the PeopleMany communists nations held great support, so that's irrelevant to if the government is good, like the USSR, and China. Support of the people only made the governments more dangerous.The Cuban support was of little importance in proportion to the threat of a USSR ally and Communist Nation beside the US and in the middle of America. While the idea that politics might be more important than a person's opinion is unpopular, it's realistic, and has saved the Cubans from the oppression of a much stronger Cuban Government and stopped the rise of American Communism.The rise of a much stronger Cuban Government would have meant mass oppression on the people and a expansion of Communism in other American nations.The US also offers Cubans free passage and someday Citizenship if they can make it to the US shoreline. This caring allowance isn't allowed to even the USA's closest allies.(4)-TradeLosing trade with Cuba doesn't harm the US. The US has extensive Trade Networks across the world, and isn't affected by Trade Losses of only $20 billion a year, or 00.1% of the US Economy.The Cuban people aren't either, as the Trade Revenue would never make it past Companies and the Government. The poor would have never seen that money.One can't argue that the Trade Embargo is bad because it Embargo's Trade. Which seems to be Pro's main argument.-Support of the EmbargoThe support isn't as important, as Politics must move forward even if the general population doesn't understand why. People understand very little about politics, using Common Sense and Fallacies to understand something that moves far beyond the realm of Common Sense. The Government must, at times, put Politics first even if the idea doesn't sound right. When forming any Alliance (including a Trade Embargo alliance) all the countries must respect the laws regarding the Embargo. Thr laws are simply apart of the Embargo, and anyone in the Embargo must respect them.A nation may not enter an Embargo against Cuba and then get mad that they aren't allowed to trade with Cuba.The US shouldn't start an Embargo, and be okay with other's who signed up for it freely trading with Cuba against the rules of the Embargo.When a Nations signs into an Alliance, they must respect it, or respectfully leave it. The UN isn't in control of the Embargo, so that's irrelevant.Conclusion-----------------------The US has helped the People of Cuba who would otherwise be under the control of a much more powerful and oppressive Government. The US also allows safety to any Cuban who makes it on shore.The US must look after US interests.The support for Cuba is misled by childish ignorance. People have a habit of going against the norm, and for 50+ years, the Embargo has been the norm.On a Political Field, Cuba is a threat to both it's people, the American Continent, and the US, and the US must find ways of keeping American Communism from spreading and gaining power.The Trade Embargo isn't friendly, it's not meant to be. Complaining that it's not nice is childish, and bares little weight. Like any aggressive action should be, it is for the better of the other 915.5 million people in America (North and South.)SOURCES:[1] http://www.history.com...[2] http://www.cbsnews.com...[3] http://en.wikipedia.org...[4] http://en.wikipedia.org...[]