Great Britain- The Anti-Christ's last stand

I look forward to a good debate. The burden of proof rests on my opponent. "Great Britain has always influenced the world with its culture, military and economic status. " No, it has not. Great Britain was formed on May 1, 1707 when Ireland and England politically joined. Are we to assume that everything before this period was amorphous? Certainly not. "Ever seen a man wear a shirt, tie and a custom made pants- It's British. When you wear a formal suit- it is British. When you talk in English- the language is from England. There is no Empire in the world that has influenced the world as has the Great Britain. " Prove this. What if I thought China, or America, or Japan has influenced the world the most? I will not accept this until my opponent proves otherwise. "Heck! The bible you read is KJV or NKJV- well it is from England. " I don't read the bible, therefore it is false. Also, not everyone reads a British bible. Provide statistics that say so. "Even during the era of Rome this nation stood toe to toe with the most powerful empire despite its small size. Then it was in the dark ages that this nation slowly started to rise from the ashes like a phoenix. " No comment, aside from this one informing you of my status on this matter. "This nation has always run parallel with super powers like US and Europe. " Europe isn't a super power. "Now we all know that the Anti-Christ will come when the world is at chaos and when they need a hero. " This is absurd. Not everyone even believes this. I most certainly don't, as I am atheist. Give me some evidence this will happen. "Everybody thinks that the Anti-Christ will be the President of the US but I DON'T THINK SO. " Says who? "Why? US is no where in the Biblical prophecy. " Neither is Britain. "Some bible scholars have predicted that US may not survive and will cease to be a nation when the Tribulation begins. " These are bible scholars. No credibility, aside from those of their faith. Give me some evidence. "Why? US has too many jealous neighbors and not to forget that China – the evil dragon is after the Glorious Bald Eagle from the West. God Bless US and I hope most people of US get rapture before Great Britain attacks them. " Nonsensical in the highest. Give me some 'jealous neighbors' and prove why they are jealous and how so. The dragon and bald eagle is idiotic at best. The dragon has nothing to do with scripture, neither does the bald eagle. You give no evidence, no proof, and no statistics. "Great Britain is plainly the beast that rises out of the sea and everybody is clueless about this. Those who have ears heed me- this is the nation that will rule the world in the end times. Let's keep in mind that the Prince of Wales has a dragon as its coat of arms. Yes, the coat of arms of Wales is a dragon – A European Dragon which looks different than the slender dragon of the East but it is still a dragon. " Okay? So if I write a dragon on a piece paper, the dragon on it symbolizes my paper will become the anti-Christ, or at least I will. This is what your logic dictates. I think it is agreed that my paper isn't going to become the anti-Christ. "Dragon- what is a big deal about dragons? You have to keep in mind that Dragon in the Bible is compared to Satan or the one. " Your grammar is poor. Now, aside from you, where does the bible state that Satan is a dragon? Only you assert this. What if I say the 'antichrist' is a cat? Are we to kill cats? No. Will they become the Antichrist? No evidence for it. "Dragons are mythological beast which was believed to give eternity to all those who drank its blood. " I think you watched a Harry Potter film, and then your mind turned unicorns into dragons. Where is your source? Where is your proof. "You can see how dragon is replacing Christ as Christ told his followers to drink his blood. Aha! There it is. " Er. .. You are connecting dots that do not exist. Just because one belief may coincide with another, which it does not, but if it does, it does not mean that it is true. What if the spoon in my hand was worshiped in some far-off country? Does that mean my spoon is god, and I should worship my spoon, and shut all others out, as they are idols? No, that is absurd. Your logic leaves much to be desired. " So, the dragon in ancient times in Europe were thought to give eternity to all those who drank its blood- Satan tries to duplicate Christ here. " Kidding me, right? Europe doesn't worship dragons. Are you completely mental? Only you asserted dragons give eternal life. Also, cannibals eat flesh. Are they impersonating jesus? Erm, no, they just like meat. I don't care if I lose conduct points for this, but as far as I can tell, you are a moron. "There is a reason why the Bible calls him the Dragon. Only Christ can give. .. " You just made up 3-5 different points, tried to connect it to Satan, and then trailed off in whatever point you were trying to make. What? ! No sense. "Where in the Bible is it written that Great Britain will rule the world in end times? " Nowhere. You make logical fallacies at every turn. Shame on you. "The seven heads are long considered to be Rome" This is debatable in itself, and is baseless. but let me tell you they are all wrong. Rome is too weak to control the world let alone influence Europe. Italy ranks 34th in world military powers and people are still stupid enough to believe that Rome is going to rule the world in end times. Italy is not a great economic power either they rank 42nd in the world in terms of economy. Those who have ears heed me before you are fooled by the tides of time. " This is presuming there will be an end, this is presuming people actually think this, and this is presuming that you make sense. Why are you talking about Rome? The claim the Rome is the seven fallen kings still is debatable. Moving on. .. "The reference to seven past kings (five have fallen, one is, and the other not yet come who remains a short while) is a historic description of the Holy Roman Empire. " Key word, past. When the bible was written, lets assume those five are dead either way. Now, the bible fails in tenses, because it is a logical fallacy. This prophecy would come true either way. It is self fulfilling. All that needed to happen were 7 Charles to be emperor. Not too hard. Also, your grammar failed again. " There have been seven Charles' as Emperors of the Holy Roman Empire. World Book Encyclopedia and other reference documents summarize the history of the Holy Roman Empire by these seven kings. This is a historical fact. But what makes this prophecy such a puzzle is its reference to the beast being "also an eighth, and is one of the seven. " The answer is simple and right before us. They all have the name Charles — Prince Charles will be the eighth when he rules over the ancient Holy Roman Empire (the modern European Union). How is he one of the seven? He is a direct descendant of the Charles VI through the Hapsburg line. " You do realize you are trying to defeat this claim, not support it, right? Anyways, my opponent's argument against himself lies on the logical fallacy of 7 people named Charles to take the throne. I think he forgot about all the people who broke the chain. Also, it is mere coincidence even people name Charles. Also, he is talking about Rome and Europe, or Great Britain. He has gotten off track! My points. 1)My opponent has yet to prove that Great Britain will host the AntiChrist. 2)My opponent has yet to prove that there is an AntiChrist. 3)My opponent has confused Europe, Great Britain, and Rome with each other many, many times. He has also confused Italy with Rome several times. 4)My opponent is connecting points that do not exist. 5)There have never been 7 consecutive kings named Charles. 6)According to scripture, the antichrist has never stood before, thereby negating my opponent's argument. Con wins by default.