The Orlando gay club shooting was a hoax.

My opponent starts with a rebuttal to the basic signs of a false flag by saying that the O.J. trial was not a false flag, as well as the Clinton Lewinsky scandal, but how does my opponent know for sure? O.J. was in a movie exposing the fake moon landings, and although it took a while to set it up, he got his payback. As for ole Willy, well let's just say the same people are basically responsible for all of these major events.http://21stcenturywire.com... "So just because an event has some elements of a false flag, doesn't mean that a false flag exists."This event is the most blatant of the false flags since 911! Even referencing another "here come the MUSLIMS" scare false flag, the Boston Bombings. All of these signs are presented, not just a few, ALL. "My opponent has said that the "bouncer" Luis Barbano is an actor; however, Barbano was not the bouncer"Apologies, "door blocker" is the term that was used by the media, I'm not sure how I was mistaken...; "More importantly, Pro was only able to cite a single actor out of the hundreds of patrons. This actor (nor any other) has come forward to suggest any conspiracy."It turns our that the shooter himself was an actor, playing in a few movies. Also a very bad, literally unknown one. http://www.thedailysheeple.com...;And another one... https://www.intellihub.com...It's clear that "Big Brother"s budget has shrunken greatly since 9/11, but, the show must go on! "It's not surprising that there was conflicting information that emerged immediately after the attack. This is common in today's society because social media is increasingly used to report the news. This means untrained, non-professional people are sharing information without knowing how to properly fact check or vet sources"No, it means that some actors were intervied and questioned by the media, and some "real people" were questioned by "untrained" media, or through social media."Pro has not proven that the false information that was being spread was intentionally being spread to promote misinformation."Remember how Omar supposedly called 911 and pledged allegience to ISIL? Ya, me too. It didn't happen.http://www.aljazeera.com..."On the shooter, Pro acknowledges that Omar Mateen was making several calls to 911 and media stations while shooting. This has already lost Pro the entire debate considering he acknowledges that the massacre took place, and therefore could not be a hoax"Really? You are going to argue semantics? "But let's assume Pro is saying that by "hoax" he means false flag operation. He's suggested that it would not be possible for Mateen to be as successful as he was."Successful? All while making calls and texting, the guy was the envy of marksmen the world over, who will tell you that it takes an average of 26 rounds to kill a person, even at close quarters.http://www.telegraph.co.uk...Even outfitted with one of these: Mateen would have about 345 rounds of ammo, "Talk to any soldier. Even at close ranges, that is not much ammo. According to the official story, Mateen averaged 3.45 rounds per casualty. That short of sheer killing power would make him the envy of even trained special operations soldiers." Again, I ask, how did he get through the door with an AR-15, at least 50 lbs of ammo, and a pistol? Mateen was texting, making calls etc while this is going on. Don't tell me you believe this crap. http://www.dangerandplay.com...All in all voters, I have shown that this is a false flag beyond doubt. It has all the signs, and while it's entirely possible that someone may have gotten hurt, although all the media is going to show us are injured. This is entirely possible with someone holding the doors closed as heard in this cut-off interview on https://youtu.be... Even if my opponent chooses not to wake up at this time, I'm sure this lowsy false flag will wake someone up. Research.;