We Probably Don't Have Libertarian Free Will

Nature Of Resolution and BoP: The motion is a negative. I am holding a negative assertion, therefor technically the BoP is on him. However, since I am pro, I will be giving arguments for my position. He is holding we have free will, so he has to offer arguments. X= resolution Y=Position(-X)(-Y)= + So my opponent is holding a positive assertion, therefor he also has a BoP.Semantics And Parameters: Con says "we are working at the macro-level or finite-size level of physics not quantum mechanics. " Con says I can not incorporate quantum mechanics in my arguments, however he at the end of his round says: "Con's position is, We Have Libertarian Free Will. That is, free-will (aka, freedom) at the living-system level is part of the physical Laws of Nature."Quantum mechanics is part of the fundamental laws of nature. Rebuttals: Con says: "Reason or not, what difference does it make when you have the free will to choose within your life experiences."The point is that you don't really choose. Any conscious thought you have is determined by unconscious neuro-physiology. Every conscious thought and subsequent action based on that conscious thought are caused by an unconscious mechanism. You didn't choose any of your thoughts or actions. You don't have free will, you have a subjective conscious experience in which it looks like you have free will. To say you could of acted different in any situation, is to literally say: "if you lived in a different universe, you would live in a different universe."Con says: " How electro-mechanics work in the brain at the “Neuro-Physiology” level to develop the metaphysics definition of “Libertarian Free Will” at the macro-level or finite-size level is all interesting, but it has not debunk one’s definition, concept, or experience of free-will. " This is to completely miss the point. The definition in the first round has the law of physics and human nature. Human nature: "Human nature refers to the distinguishing characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling and acting, which humans tend to havenaturally, independently of the influence of culture." All thoughts and actions are the result of unconscious neuro-physiology. So human nature is subsequently deterministic.Con says: "Pro moves on to “Omniscient Being” where theopedia.com deals with the idea of God. If Pro wants to go down that path, the BoF (Burden of Proof) of God's existence is on Pro."Once again, this is to completely miss the point. If con analyzed the context and attitude of my dialogue, he would have realized the purpose. The point of me including that was to show that if there is a god, there is absolutely no free will. I'm showing that the notion of free will makes no sense on any worldview.On The Nature Of The Mutliverse: Con implies there is no evidence for the MWI. Basically if the MWI is correct there must be a universe for each possible physical state. The multiverse is a consequence of inflation. Inflation states that the universe rapdily expanded after the big bang. However some regions expand faster than others, thus universes evolve from different rates of expanded spaces. Before we get to the evidence for inflation, I think it is important to say we have a good philosophical basis for the multiverse and MWI. If something can happen, it will happen, because if something never happens or never will happen, it is intuitive to say it can't happen.1. Let's visit the multiverse. The multiverse is a natural consequence of inflation. Via BICEP2 Primordial gravitation waves have been detected, which is almost indisputable proof of inflation.Inflation accounts for the:1.Uniformity. The cosmic background radiation is quite uniform. Inflation adequately accounts for the uniformity. A uniform region expanded rapidly, evolving into our visible universe.2. Mass density. Inflation predicts the omega should be 1. The Planck satellite measures the omega as 1, which means our universe should be flat, which it is.3.Small non-uniformity. The small non-uniformity in the universe is easily accounted for by quantum fluctuations, which have been observed in the CBR.As explained the multiverse is a consequence of inflation. All the other predictions have come true. I would say that would constitute a good reason to think the multiverse is true.Via inflation, some parts of the early universe expanded more than other, created bublbles of space time, which later developed into other universes, and our universe is just a bubble universe2ND Law Of Thermodynamics: "The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases, because isolated systems always evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, a state with maximum entropy."Maybe CON can explain what this has to do with free will, but what I gather from the 2nd law of thermodynamics is that the universe is probably going to return to nothingness.Free will is no where to be found in the fundamental laws of physics and certainly not in quantum mechanics.In CON's next round, I hope he will elaborate on thermodynamics and constructural law and their connection to free will.Sources:http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.space.com...http://www.universetoday.com...