Batman goes against better villians than Spider-man

1) You say that I have spelling and grammar mistakes, if so then point them out. But spelling a grammar are not what we came here to debate for. 2) Bane is not a super genius and he gets his strength from tubes in the back of his neck. Sure Bane may have broken Batman's back but Loki TOOK OVER THE WORLD for a short amount of time before he was stopped by Spider-man and the Avengers. Your quote: "The Lizard is a scientist turned super villain who has super strength, self healing, and animal behavior when the Lizard, while Batman has the same thing in Killer Croc expect Killer Croc doesn't change back into a human he is just a Killer Croc and can stay under water longer than the Lizard. " I agree with half of what you said. You said that the Lizard has strength, self healing, and animal behavior. You also go on to say that Killer Croc is a better villain because he does not turn back into a human and can stay under water longer than the Lizard. This is a false point because if you read the Spider-man comic books you will know that later on in the story, the Lizard maintains the "lizard" form forever. Also just being able to stay underwater for extended periods of time does not make you a good villain. The Lizard is a genius who has super strength, self healing and animal behavior. Killer Croc is just some person that can breath underwater. These are your own words. The Beetle and Mr. Freeze both have suits but the Beetle's suit is better because like you said, he can fly and shoot laser which can kill people, Mr. Freeze? Well he is just another typical psychopath that freezes people. You also go on to say that Mr. Freeze has a cold heart and motives to kill, but that is exactly what the Beetle has. You also compare the Chameleon to Clayface. Comparing Clayface to the Sandman would be more fair. The only difference is that the Sandman can make bigger objects with his body because he has an unlimited amount of sand, he can grow as big as he wants, and he is invincible. On top of all of that, he is a murderer. Clayface can just "turn his body into whatever he wants" the Sandman can do that and much more, once again these are your words. Next, you say that Dr. Octopus is stronger than the Joker. This alone proves that Dr. Octopus is a better villain than the Joker. But you go on to say that he lacks the evil of the Joker and he does not kill for the fun of it. I don't think that killing people for the fun of it makes someone a good villain, also you say that he lacks the evil. Dr. Octopus is just as evil as the Joker. 3) "Batman is in the Justice League so the villains he goes up against have to be powerful enough to give the most powerful superhero in Superman terrible. " I fail to understand what point you are trying to make here due to bad grammar so I will not argue it. But simply say that I disagree. Next you STILL go on to say that the actor makes the villain better. This is completely not true, actors have NOTHING to do with this debate. 4)"Well Batman has 34 villains from his classic rogues' gallery, while Spider-man has 39 villains from his classic rogues' gallery. " Well even you admitted, according to your statement, Spider-man still has more villains than Batman. 5) It is your fault, I did not procrastinate. You posted your debate argument at the last minute so I would not have enough time to post my argument. Lucky for me I type really fast. 6) I proved all of Pro's points wrong and he still did not prove my points wrong, therefore the audience should go with my arguments.