Hitler was one of, if not, the most evil being in history

Another line-by-line:RebuttalR12) "When I said England, Denmark and Sweden were snooty and arrogant, in comparison to Nazi Germany, I meant that the invasions they initiated were completely unprovoked. " Which invasions? The repeated lack of specificity in CON's arguments make even the most trivial response effective in refuting them.The English were provoked to invade the 13 colonies by insubordinate action by the colonists. Every country in Europe was in the situation of "fight or die" due to intense competition between rival states. Some, like Poland, did not survive. Others, like England, were able to escape what otherwise would have been imminent destruction at the hands of the Spanish by out-doing their rivals in the New World.Bottom line, provocation was rampant.R13) The Native Americans, the Indians, the Irish, the Scottish, the Inuits did not deserve to go through what they went through. Neither did the colonists. Neither did the English when the Spanish Armada was about to destroy them. Neither did...[etc]R14) There was no reason for them to [sic] England, Denmark or Sweden, other than an arrogant and inflated sense of imperial and moral superiority.Every culture without exception has an inflated sense of imperial and moral superiority vis a vis other nations. Without it, they would cease to be a culture or a nation and would be assimilated by the more dominant power. CON's point here is a non-starter.R15) "Neither did the Germans deserve to go through what they went through in Versailles, which is why I say that the vindictive nature of Germany was pretty justified."Right, because WWI was not enough justification for the Treaty of Versailles.R16) "And yes, hating on tomboys and autistic people is not okay, which is what many English, Danes and Swedes still do -- hating them."To compare this to the Holocaust is absolutely insulting. I ask that conduct be taken against CON for proffering such an irresponsible, insensitive, and borderline trolling remark. R17) "Anyways, English, Danish and Swedish atrocities were unprovoked and uncalled for."CON has yet to mention exactly what these atrocities were.R18) "The English version of slavery was extremely messed up. So was the Danish. Now in a way, it depends on the country. In the case of England and Denmark, it seems that there was no slave trade. They just ruthlessly went to Africa, and kidnapped as many black people as they could. In the case of Spain, it was a trade, so blacks only have themselves to blame for selling their own people to slavery."Already refuted all of this. What the Nazis did was far worse.R19) "Now, having said that. Elitism is evil. As far as Nazi experiments are concerned, you think the English and Danish weren't worse even in that. English and Danish slaveowners thought it was fun to torture their slaves. "CON does not rebut the point. What the Nazis did through live experimentation was far worse in comparison to what the English and Danish did.R20) "Here's the thing, when I said Jim Crow came from the English, btw, I said the founders of the Klan were predominantly English in ancestry. They had no reason to treat black people like that. None whatsoever. None. They just killed and tortured people for fun. For fun. That makes it more evil than the Nazis."Right. Because slavery was not integral to the Southern economy. Because it's fun to have to rely upon a large population you fear may revolt and kill you at any time. Because it's fun to keep a gun at arm's length in case a slave tries to kill you.R21) "Hitler, from what it seems, had a bad experience with a Jew. That doesn't excuse the Holocaust. But I can see how it got his heart cold. His Jew doctor apparently neglected his mother, causing her to die. Losing a mother is a horrible thing."What is this? Pop psychology of a dead man from CON? This line of argumentation is absolutely and totally irresponsible with zero factual basis.R22) " In the case of the KKK, it wasn't bad experiences. Again, it was arrogance, a feeling that it was OK to oppress black people and belittle them. Same with the imperialistic countries. No reason. That's why I said it. They were purely evil."Again, what the Nazis did was far worse. CON does not refute this. R23) "In 1951, Danish authorities in an attempt to steal more from Greenland, engaged in divide and conquer. They seperated Inuit families by force. It was the subject of a film called "Experiment."CON is attempting to compare the separation of 22 Inuit children from their families to the well over 6 million Jews that were killed in concentration camps. This line of argumentation, as is most of CON's argument in general, is insulting.ConclusionThe arguments that CON is proffering are prima facie insignificant compared to the atrocities committed by the Nazis. CON has not refuted any of my points, and instead brings up exceptionally weak and relatively insignificant events to attempt to counter.