WTC 7 was a controlled demolition

I am here to scientifically prove the world trade center seven was a controlled demolition. Here are the forces that destroy buildings; Fires Controlled demolition earthquake or an explosion http://www.ae911truth.org... A typical controlled demolition has several characteristics 1. A sudden onset of destruction at base of structure 2. strait down, symmetrical collapse into footprint 3. Demolition waves remove column support 4. Free-fall speed though path of greatest resistance 5. Total dismemberment of steel structure for shipping 6. Minimal damage to adjacent structures 7. sounds and flashes of explosives 8. Enormous clouds of pulverized concrete 9. Squibs: Explosive charges visible at upper floors 10. Chemical evidence of cutter charges I will now explain how WTC 7 demonstrates each of these characteristics, but first lets learn about World Trade Center 7. It was 47 stories tall, it would be the tallest building in 33 states, and it was NOT hit by an airplane. Yet it was the third high-rise to collapse on 9/11 (110 yards away from N tower). WTC 7 was hit by debris from the north tower and collapsed 7 hours later at 5:20pm. It also had office fires on the 12th and 11th floor and the 7th floor on the north side of the building, as well as a fire on the 13th floor which spread from the east side to the north-face. http://www.ae911truth.org... ok now to the demolition characteristics 1. A sudden onset of destruction at base of structure; here is the an Emergency Worker who was an eyewitness to the sudden onset http://www.ae911truth.org... 2. strait down, symmetrical collapse into footprint Here is the video of wtc7 completely collapsing Strait down in 6.5 seconds with no resistance. http://www.ae911truth.org... Dan rather is presenting the video this is what he said ".... it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television where a building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down" here is a side by side comparison to acknowledge a controlled demolition. http://www.ae911truth.org... Into its own footprint http://www.ae911truth.org... 3. Demolition waves remove column support How did 23 core-columns give way at once? Can fire cause the core columns to fail essentially "simultaneously" (after columns under the east penthouse) such that the building would collapse straight down, rapidly and symmetrically? http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... 4. Free-fall speed though path of greatest resistance The following link is the data plotted from the actual building fall. http://www.ae911truth.org... The curve (theoretical free fall at constant acceleration) is then overlaid on top of the data. The data neatly fits the curve. Therefore the steel columns gave almost no resistance to the falling building. Were they "removed" by fire? or by explosives? 5. Total dismemberment of steel structure for shipping A 47-story skyscraper compressed to stories http://www.ae911truth.org... The latter picture indicates a total dismemberment of the steel skeleton these buildings collapsed and toppled over http://www.ae911truth.org... they are recognizable as buildings (concrete) 6. Minimal damage to adjacent structures A Minimal damage to adjacent Post office and verizon office bldg. requires precise control of detonation sequencehttp://www.ae911truth.org... 7. sounds of explosions Barry Jennings, NY office of emergency Mgmt. Eyewitness to WTC7 explosions-before collapse. http://www.ae911truth.org... Craig Bartmer, NYPD eyewitness to explosions http://www.ae911truth.org... And explosions recorded at FDNY post-late morning http://www.ae911truth.org... 8. Enormous Pyroclastic clouds of pulverized concrete http://www.ae911truth.org... 9. Pools of molten iron This section applies to the twin towers as well as WTC 7 http://www.ae911truth.org... that was not molten aluminum from an airplane. Wtc structural engineer; eyewitness molten metal "as of 21 days after the attacks, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running." -Leslie Robertson, structural engineer responsible for the design of the wtc. Molten metal on the street http://www.ae911truth.org... Saw pools of "literally molten steel" a the WTC - Peter Tully of tully construction "I talked to many contractor and they said they actually saw molten metal beams had just totally had been melted because of the heat" -chaplain Herb Trimpe "descended deep below street level to areas where underground fires still burned and steel flowed in molten streams." -reporter with rare access to the debris at ground zero. "fires are still activley burning and the smoke is very intense... in some pockets now being uncovered they are finding molten steel." -Alison Geyh, PhD. there are many many more eyewitnesses to the molten metal http://www.ae911truth.org... A massive heat source bends steel columns with no buckling or the molten metal "meteorites" http://www.ae911truth.org... Or you can look at the nasa infrared photo that nasa took that shows you were the molten pools of metal are. http://www.ae911truth.org... HAHA and yet nist denies the existence of the molten metal http://www.ae911truth.org... 10. Chemical Evidence of thermate cutter charges could thermate be responsible for that molten metal? http://www.ae911truth.org... Here is the evidence of thermite in the wtc dust http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... Unignited thermite found in the WTC dust http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... http://www.ae911truth.org... With all this evidence we can establish direct evidence of explosion destruction. although i have much more argument i will leave it here for now. the official story is the conspiracy theory not this. this is called conspiracy fact so please don't call me a conspiracy theorist.