Homosexuality is not Immoral

Disclaimer: I am a Christian but the belief about Homosexuality as an immoral subject can be found in Atheism as well. I am a Bisexual however. Preamble: Due to the recent changes in moral and ethic philosophy among society one of the most contentious social issues has become LGBTQ2+ rights. As a Christian and a Rationalist who has participated in Christian apologetics I have attempted to answer the question of Homosexuality and morality. I believe I have. Natural or Not? : While there is no conclusive evidence that homosexuality is an inborn trait similar to that of skin colour or influenced by environment akin to that of behavioural development. Scientists researching this subject seem to be closing in on the truth that homosexuality is a inborn trait alongside all forms of sexual orientation or attraction. A thought experiment for some who dismisses scientific notions: Did you choose you sexual orientation? I will concede that homosexualituybeing natural does not mean it is moral as there are natural moral realism is faulty take the example of pedophilia which is an adult's natural attraction to child but through moral reasoning is seen as immoral. Many would argue that homosexuality evolved as a survival trait because geneticists have found that early humans groups that had homosexual members outlived those who didn't due to more available resources because of the lack of Kids. I shall present two syllogisms to defend my propositions. A syllogism is an argument that comprises of axioms or postulates which are propositions of which are presumed to be true. The axioms are referred to as premises For example if I was debating whether a meta property of the laws of logic is that they are independent of human beings I might make my first axiom say something like this: It is illogical for a woman to say that she is bought pregnant and not pregnant at the same time as that would contradict the law of noncontradiction. 1st Syllogism: P1. Morality is a rational enterpise P2. Moral disagreements are based on factual inaccuracies not Moral differences P3. Negative views towards homosexuality are based factual inaccuracies not Moral differences Con. Therefore, Homosexuality is not immoral 2nd Syllogism: P1. If one considers Marriage to be about love than one cannot consider homosexuality immoral P2. Homosexuality is about survival and love not sex Con. Therefore, Homosexuality is not immoral. Are these syllogisms sound? Let us find out. Defending the first syllogism: P1 isn't really controversial we define have used rationality in determining an objective moral code. P2 isn't controversial either just look at slavery which was condoned by a culture that didn't understand genetic diversification within species and thus the interconnectivity of the human race. Most people who oppose homosexuality think that it is unnatural and something that can be changed, My response would be to look at the thought experiment I have. The Conclusion follows logically. Defending the 2nd Syllogism: P1 comes from the argument for same sex marriage which says that love is love. P2 is supported by Science and logical deduction. P3 follows logically. I know that there is so much that I could cover but I decided to keep it short. I await a rebuttal.