Jesus was a false Messiah!

Thank you for replying to my previous argument.You forget about the temple Moses built in the wilderness. So that makes THREE.That was a TABERNACLE, different from a temple. The definitions you provide by Strong's definition proves my point Jesus name was called Emmanuel. 1st. Call: means to means to call out, recite, read, cry out proclaim; to summon, invite, call for and commission; to call oneself; to be named. 2nd. Name: A litteral name; reputation, fame or glory; memorial, monument. So by someone proclaiming Jesus to be God, is the same as calling Him Emmanuel. (GOD is with us)Sorry. Jesus was NOT God. And here are a few verses to PROVE my point.And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. Is Jesus denying to be god? I think so. Let us take a look at this passage. The bolded part is Jesus speaking.He says, "Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is, God." However, if he is God, why is he telling him that there is one that is good--god?Ye have heard how I say unto you, I go waway, and come again unto you If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I John 14:28This is Jesus speaking. Here, he clearly states that God the Father is greaer than him. How can you be less than yourself?another passageIf ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ setteth on the right hnd of God. Colossians 3:1Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. John 20:17If Jesus was God, he cannot have a God.Quote "There are also numerous contradictions in the gospels about the death and ressurection of Jesus." I want you to list some of the contradictions you think are in the Gospels. I also want you to answer my one question. Where is the body of Christ? We know he was a historical person. History has tried to cover up the fact he was God. They killed Him and buried Him. History tells of this story, and I am not talking about the Bible account. I am saying secular history says these facts So where is his body?First with the contradictions in the gospels. 1. What time of day was Jesus crucified? At the third hour: "And it was the third hour when they crucified him." (Mark 15:25) At least three hours later, because at "about the sixth hour" John says that Jesus was still with Pilate before the Jewish crowd. (John 19:14) Also, Matthew (27:45) and Luke (23:44) have Jesus already on the cross at the sixth hour, so they, too, contradict John's account. Some theologians claim that John is giving the hour in "Roman time," but the Romans reckoned time from sunrise, as did the Jews. So the "sixth hour" would mean the same for both. Also, there is no evidence in the gospel of John to support any theory that the author was counting the hours any differently from normal Jewish custom. The gospel of John was not written in Rome, nor for a Roman audience. For info on the Roman system of reckoning time, see J. Balsdon, Life and Leisure in Ancient Rome, p.1. Also L. and R. Adkins, Handbook to Life in Ancient Rome. 2. The second coming of Jesus was a failed prediction. Jesus predicted that on his return to earth, "the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will be falling from heaven, and the powers in the heavens will be shaken. And then they will see the Son of man coming in clouds with great power and glory. And then he will send out the angels, and gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of heaven." (Mark 13:24-27) He even predicted a deadline for it to happen: "Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away before all these things take place." (Mark 13:30) The generation he was speaking to did pass away, but the sun still shines, the stars still twinkle in the night sky, and there have been no heavenly passengers riding in on the clouds. Jesus was wrong. Mark 13:30 is not the only passage that makes such a prediction. We see it also in Matthew 24:34, which uses the same language as Mark. Luke 21:25-27, 32 also has nearly the same wording. Also, Matthew 16:28 - "There are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom."And in Luke 9:26-27 - "There are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God."And Mark 9:1 - "Truly I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see that the kingdom of God has come with power." The Greek word for "generation" means essentially the same as our English word. According to the New Oxford Annotated Bible (1973 ed., p. 1204, note to Matthew 24:34), "the normal meaning of this generation would be 'men of our time,' and the words would refer to a period of 20-30 years." The theologians often appeal to Mark 13:32 to argue that Jesus was not making a specific prediction about when the end would occur. That passage tells us that Jesus himself does not know exactly when the end will come: "But of that day or that hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." Here, however, he's just telling us that he doesn't know the exact time when the kingdom of God will arrive. He is still very clear that it will occur sometime during the lifetime of the generation he's speaking to. Another way in which the theologians try to escape from this embarrassment is to claim that the generation referred to in Mark 13:30, Matthew 24:34, etc. is not the generation Jesus was speaking to, but the generation that will be living at the time these amazing events take place. But this is obviously absurd, because it would mean that Jesus is telling his audience, "Some of the people in the generation that will be alive when these things happen will be alive when these things happen." A statement like this conveys no meaning at all, and there would be no point in Jesus saying such a thing. 3. The genealogies of Joseph given by Matthew and Luke contradict each other. According to Matthew, Joseph was descended from David's son Solomon through 27 generations (David to Joseph inclusive). (Matthew 1:1-16) But according to Luke, Joseph was descended from David's son Nathan through 42 generations (David to Joseph, inclusive). (Luke 3:23-31) Most of the names in these two genealogies are different, and they do not even agree on who Joseph's father was. Matthew tells us that Joseph's father was called Jacob (Matthew 1:16), while Luke tells us that his father was Heli (Luke 3:23). There are Christians who claim that Luke's genealogy is that of Mary, and Matthew's is that of Joseph, but there is nothing in Luke that remotely suggests that interpretation, and both Matthew's and Luke's lists specifically mention Joseph as the end point. I am out of room, unfortunately. I will touch on missed stuff later.