God vs. Evolution

"I have not much time, am not a experienced debater, nor will I change my position under any circumstances in this debate." Perhaps I did not make myself clear. Whatever then. I understand, you'll get better I'm sure. "So I have one more thing to put out there. Warning: This does NOT mean that I cannot rebut any of your comments but rather that I have not time to type an answer as it is Easter Sunday and I am busy." I understand. I only had an hour to post one of my rounds because of a Passover Seder. I'm not a practicing Jew, but I am a minor, my family is Jewish and I consider myself a cultural Jew. "The earths Magnetic Field - The Dynamo Theory is ultimately incorrect and has many faults. The Rapid Decay Theory - If you use the Rapid Decay Theory to predict what the magnetic field was like in the earth's past, you find that the earth had to be formed less than 10,000 years ago. Otherwise, the electrical current necessary to sustain the magnetic field would have been so large that it would cause the earth to explode! Thus, since the rapid decay theory assumes that a world-wide, cataclysmic event such as Noah's Flood occurred sometime in earth's past, and since the rapid decay theory concludes that the earth must be less than 10,000 years old, most geologists reject it. They reject it despite the fact that it is the only theory consistent with all of the data collected." The problem with only using data we've collected is that we can't observe over long periods of time. The problem is, Noah's flood model simply does not reflect the data seen. How could Noah's arc hold that many animals? With its dimensions, even just holding 'kinds', and excluding fish and birds from the boat and assuming they take no room or food, there still would not be enough room for most of the animals, even excluding their food. And big cats need quite a bit of space, as they are very territorial animals, and will refuse to share it with other cats, even sometimes females.[1] And that's just the cats. But even if you think that god changed their mental states so you can just shove them in with no room for exercise for years, you still have one problem. Speciation and species distribution. If you watched the Ken Ham debates, Bill Nye explained that evolution would have to happen much more rapidly then scientists think it is if the 'kinds' on the arc theory were true. We would be seeing new species every day, and not just small difference in species that just can't mate, but species with significant differences. Evolution just doesn't happen that much. And how did non-aquatic species or non-flying species reach places like Malaysia, Japan, the Americas, the UK, Madagascar, Philippines, the Caribbean. And yes every once in a while, a small amount of a species will be on a log and wash up on the shore of a island and proliferate. Or birds will get swept out far more then they could fly by a storm. But are we to believe that bears could have gotten to North America? And why did none of the animals that are found in obscure places in the world, like Australia or Antarctica, stop and settle instead of making the arduous journey? Surely there were places almost as hospitable to the Penguin in Russia, or on some southern isle, why did none of them stop there? And the fossil record is way off. If the flood were true, we would just find fossils scattered, perhaps in many layers, but most likely in one, with complete randomness. Instead, we find fossils that almost all the time are in one layer of earth, and other fossils that are pretty much always in another layer of earth. This is why any scientific model that requires Noah's flood to be true would be rejected outright. The flood model simply does not match up with our current evidence, and has failed to predict evidences. Evolution has. "P.S. Back to the Clown Fish - If the Sea Anemone did not sting, then it too would be extinct as many fish would eat it before it could grow again. . ." No, not necessarily. There are other foods for animals, and it only takes a small amount of sting to convince a predator that it isn't worth eating. Not all the sea anemones would be eaten, and those that developed the sting would slowly become the majority of those that were not eaten. Many plants survive today with little to no protection, but they live, simply by sheer numbers propagating their survival. [1] http://www.animalplanet.com...