Homosexual, Bisexual, and Transgender tolerance should be briefly taught at schools.

"THE FACT IS THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS THE MOST OPEN HATE IN AMERICA" Even supposing that it is, why is that a schools responsibility? Try to think of your argument in reverse, and perhaps you will gain a sense of what I am trying to get across. Suppose that I was advocating that schools should teach its students about the dangers and horrors of homosexuality. Is it a schools place to foist their agendas on you at the expense of a homosexual? It sounds kind of fascist when you see it in reverse, huh? That's because it is. A Libertarian, I would think that you would want to get away from that since it doesn't focus on individual rights. What you are suggesting is actually a conglomerate of fascism and socialism. "I'D LIKE TO SEE SOME EVIDENCE OF HOW EDUCATION OF A CONCEPT IS BAD FOR STUDENTS." Okay. The earth is round. That is one example of how teaching a concept can be bad for students. Its not that concepts are bad. Everything is a concept, including mathematics and language. The problem is specifically with siding on social issues, particularly social issues that stir dissension. Homosexuality just so happens to be one of those heated debates. All I'm saying is reserve the soap box for after school, as it is not pertinent to an education. "ITS PEOPLE LIKE YOU THAT WANT TO HIDE KIDS FROM CONCEPTS LIKE EVOLUTIO BECAUSE YOU PERSONALLY DISAGREE." Oh, really? That's news to me. I'm a little curious as to how you would know that, supposing it were true (which it isn't, btw). "WHAT ABOUT REMOVING HOLOCAUST FROM THE CURRICULUM FOR HOLOCAUST DENIERS?" The holocaust is a part of history, and as such, belongs in history class. The moral of it is for you to decide. "Red Ribbon Week against drugs. Abstinence, Be faithful, use Condoms. Etc. Neither of these created an Us vs. Them atmosphere. This atmosphere, however, is going on now and can be reduced with social education. Violence and discrimination are going on now and if you're truly against those things, then you should be for reducing them." All of those are social issues, and as such, has no place within school curricula aside from a social studies class. And to be clear, an abstinence class can alienate a young person who is promiscuous. An abortion class can alienate somehow who had an abortion and can sway their decision in either direction. These kind of topics illicit strong emotion in people. I'm certainly not suggesting that we pretend they don't exist. Please don't misunderstand me to mean that. I simply think that it is in a schools best interest, not to mention the students, especially in the public domain, that these issues be dealt with outside of their class. "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO HIDE YOUR CHILD FROM CONCEPTS THAT ARE LOGICAL AND BENEFICIAL." That is your opinion. You are entitled to it. But it does not mean that you are necessarily right in what is logical and beneficial. "The Buddhist lobby might want to have math removed from the curriculum because it is a human created concept. The Satanist lobby might want to remove teaching of Abrahamic religion. The French lobby want to have Latin removed from the curriculum so that more students will study French." Fine. Let them lobby. That's their Constitutional right to lobby. "EACH STUDENT HAS THE RIGHT TO LEARN EVERY CONCEPT EVERY OTHER STUDENT LEARNS. YOU CAN'T PULL A CONCEPT THAT MAKES SENSE AND IS BENEFICIAL BECAUSE YOU PERSONALLY DISAGREE." Well, lets put your money where your mouth is. Bear in mind this is your convoluted idea. Lets have special classes teaching about the dangers of homosexuality and evolution because it is beneficial to teach students what other students learn. Just because you personally disagree does not give you the right to silence the opinions of others. Doesn't sound so good anymore, does it? To reiterate, that's your argument, not mine. Thanks for the debate. I look forward to any future debates me might have.