My opponent is a zombie (not serious)

Let me illustrate in a Socratic dialogue. Sonofkong: My opponent is a zombie. Strike (If that's what he wishes to be called): Why is that? Sonofkong: Simple, of all possible world's, the Mentalist one is not only the simplest, ruling it out by using Occam's razor, but is unopposed and has none of the contradictions or philosophical problems posed by the physicalist one which is the sole world where my opponent can exist. The so called "Mental-Physical" world would not exist due to the mind body problem without divine intervention which wouldn't stand due to the fact both parties are athiests. Strike: Well, I am concious, I swear. I am sorry but my opponent's word is little to no proof he exists. Our senses are fallable and he could not be existing in reality but instead could be in my mind, or even my retina. There are infinite possibilities in the mentalist interpretation, considering the rules grounded in this reality are nill, and only one for the physicalist, which is flawed of course. I will now make more formal arguments before my refutations. Argument #1: Synesthesia I have a mild case of synesthesia, certain noises and stimuli trigger weird sensations. For instance upon making love my surroundings are partially cloaked in a static purple. There isn't a leprechaun secretly sprinkling around silver and violet pigment. These sensations happen in my mind and are essentially as real as anything else. Considering consensus says my sensations are not real, so what does that say about the sensations supposedly shared by my fellow zombies. Even if we do live in a physical universe everything occuring to me could be hindered. Several Americans live in a colorless world while half of all women live in a world of higher than average color definiton. . http://en.wikipedia.org... Argument #2: No free will I'm afraid that even if you were to magically disprove mentalist theory or descarteanism there is a backup idea which says that time is set (similar to Dr. Manhattan) and we have no free will to change it. This is very complicated idea, backed up by Quantum physics which says there is a set chance or role of the dice for every possibility. this is too complex to put to more complex words so I will show you a link which explains it better. . http://www.informationphilosopher.com... (also watch video 1) . http://www.youtube.com... Argument #3: Just for fun Although this is partially far fetched I would like to say that I have the strangest feeling as iff my surroundings happen ,almost 100%, in correlation to what I think is most likely to happen in things that matter ot on my interaction. I do not feign being psychic but instead think that being the creator of such a fine world have some awareness of it in a fully 3-dimensional sphere. Refutations: Instead of refuting word for word I have decided to refute his entire argument by saying that if he thinks he exists or is reacting to my statement like a venus fly trap that is not prof of conciousness. You are putting up as convincing an argument as cleverbot. I will end by premptively stopping an "Appearance is reality" speech by saying that no matter how many dragons I chase while shooting heroin it's impossible for wings to carry a 10 ton reptile which given the situation can't even get enough thermal energy in the cold.