The word "homophobic" should be banned

I"ll begin by asking if you would kindly source your research and data these conclusions are pulled from, including name, people heading the research and year in which the research was conducted please. This is avoid the problem where a debater posts statistics and conclusions that is not stated or implied by the evidence, as well as making sure the debater isn"t simply making up facts that support his or her point. Statistics and other third-party information and research will be disregarded unless they can be accredited. It would be useful as well, at this point, to mention that percentage-only statistics are almost worthless without quantity figures to go with them, as well as how much of the population they make up. Saying 40% of all murders are committed by Homosexuals but not quantifying it, or stating how much they make up the population gives no indication of the likelihood any Homosexual is likely to be a murderer. Now, about this child molestation concern. You do indeed have the right, as a parent, to worry about the safety of your children, and a desire to protect them is indeed understandable. However, basing the way you treat someone based solely on the actions of the few is wrong in the first place. And to say that someone "should not have rights" because of the actions of the few is nothing sort of fascism. If you are an American, it is the equivalent of saying that White Men are not allowed the rights of the constitution and bill because White Men account for 63.7% of all mass school shootings (97% male, 79% white, 63.7% for white AND male) (1). I think you should define "worst possible way" for the purposes of this debate. Earlier in your response you mentioned homosexuals "should not have rights" " I think this is classed as a worse form of discrimination than name-calling. The word "Homophobic" is being used to outcast people who are being homophobic, not people protecting their children from child molesters. While it is true that on some occasions someone is called "homophobic" for reasons other than genuine homophobia, in the same way people can "play the race card" and call racism for non-race based discrimination, it follows the same trend that it more often is genuine malice towards the victim. The whole world has not gone mad " Homosexuality is still not tolerated in some parts of the world, notably in the Middle East, in Africa and in Russia. So for your statement to be true, these places must be doing all they can to make sure Homosexual offenders get away with everything. In truth, they often get punished for nothing more than being homosexual. In Iran, you are sentenced to death if you are a mature male consenting to homosexual intercourse. (2) Homosexuality has been discovered to be sufficiently dissimilar to Paraphilia (Sexual Deviation) and was removed from the DSM in 1974(3). Saying Homosexuality is sexual deviation is now imperially opinion. "Probably" isn"t a good enough basis to deny rights on. The difference between those words and the word "Homophobic" is that those two words are derogatory slang used with malice against gays and black people respectively. "Homophobic" is like "Racist", in that they are both used to describe the people who use the two words mentioned. You do have the right to protect your family " so protect them from confirmed threats, not fabricated maybes and false statistically folk demons. 1- https://davinasquirrel.wordpress.com... 2- https://en.wikipedia.org... 3- https://en.wikipedia.org...