Religion Is Progressive and Necessary

1. I am not against forcing the child to teach or to make him learn anything at all.Labelling a 'child' and then forcing him to attend something as a 'religiuos' person, not as a learner, is something like an ABUSE. "a Marxist father bringing his son to a Marxist talk is not child abuse." -- I did not oppose that. You can REAR A CHILD UP in your background. But labelling him from the beginning is a mental ABUSE. 2. "Akin to rape and physical beating" - If you are trying to say that the form of abuse I am talking about is not an abuse at all, if compared to this, what would you say about mental ragging?Constraining to have a label from the day a child was born - is ab ABUSE. Teaching and going to ceremonies without that label is not. 4. I am explaining why I called male circumcision a 'mutilation'. [What I have taked about is Forced Genital Mutilation. Not Female Genital Mutilation. If you can prove that I have talked about it, then I will confess my 'guilt' in the comment section.]What does 'mutilation' mean?According to The Free Doctionary, 'Mutilation' means 1. To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple. 2. To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. 3. To make imperfect by excising or altering parts. It is evident that there are a lot of health benefits of male-circumcision. What are they?Decresing the chance of UTI: That's really funny, indeed. Do you remove you epidermis when you are born, just to decrease the chance of skin-diseases? Should I ampute my Vermiform Appendix when I am born, just to decrease the chance of Appendicitis? Using that logic, Abstinence is the best way to prevent Gonorrhea.The smegma can also be cleared All of these diseases can prevented, if proper care is taken. And if the diseases occur even after taking proper medical care, it still can be cured. Science allows us to do so. Cutting of body-part of an infant to prevent a disease? How can that be a prevention measure? It is a loss of a functional tissue. It contains a huge lot of nerve-endings, blood vessels. It is extremely sensitive, almost like the glans. The BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY published a research-report, that shows how functioning tssues are lost due to circimcision.Read it here : www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/For more information, you can read this - "Circumcision:R32;Is the risk of urinary tract infection really the pivotal issue?" - Clinical Pediatrics, 1992;31(2):100-104, Chessare JB. Cutting of a child's foreskin, when surgically not recommended by Doctors, is VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. When Circumcision is not surgically recommended by the Doctors, but by the religious-ideas, that IS A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT OF HAVING A BODY PART.Genitals are not hairs. 5. I am criticizing religion as a whole. What is the meaning of religion?According to the Oxford Dictionary, The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods:ideas about the relationship between science and religion A particular system of faith and worship:the world’s great religions A pursuit or interest followed with great devotion:consumerism is the new religion That is why I am constantly talking about religion being a cult. 6. Goutam Buddha was an atheist. He did not believe the proposition that a creator God exists. He even advocated some ideas which dialectical-materialists advocate. [Source :1. Buddhism and the God-idea by Nyanaponika Thera. 2. 'Bouddha-Darshan by Rahul Sankrityayan, 3. Achintita Sutta.]In 1990, a large number of Hindus were forced to escape Bhutan. This was done to 'preserve' the Buddhist culture! [The Guardian - April 20, 2008]What would you say about the '969 Movement'?7. If person-A is a criminal, and has not yet been prosecuted, does not justify the crimes done by person-B. You brought up the 'Cultural Revolution'. Well, even if I acknowledge the bourgeois-claim and slanders that it was bad, it still does not justfy the crimes of religion. 8. You are completely ignoring what Einstein meant by saying 'Religion' and trying to impose the meaning of Religion from our perspective on the mouth of Einstein.What did Einstein mean by saying Religion? "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it." That is Einsteinian religion. His letters in the same context will too speak volumes for it.9. My personal admiration to anything does not justify the crimes done because of religion. I have no problem with anyone who happens to have a religion. My problem is with someone, who does something being motivated by a religion.By saying Religion, I mean, any organized religion that is based of faith. That's what I am arguing against. Not a particular club, but a faith-based concept. 10. So If my opponent argues using lies and addresses something that I have never uttered a single word about, I have to stay silent? Otherwise, it is a logical fallacy?