Hillary should be in Indicted for her crimes.

I will remind the con that this debate is whether Hillary should be indicted for her crimes. That being said, eligibility of POTUS is in fact a part of this debate. If you are to be indicted you cannot run for president. I'll say it a second time. If you are to be indicted for a crime you cannot run for POTUS. Therefore eligibility to run for such a position is related. My first paragraph is not irrelevant. You are to refute each point I make. You did not. The next time you do not refute each point I make I will end the debate. I have no time for childish lawyering. James Comey specifically stated on the contrary to what Secretary Clinton had stated herself. She henceforth lied about having possession of classified documents in an un-secure server. That is a federal crime. Secretary Clinton also stated that they were not labeled classified. James Comey testified that they WERE labeled. Secretary Clinton claimed that No classified emails were sent or received. That is false. They were. "For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters." http://heavy.com... Hillary's testimony is contradictory to what FBI director James Comey had stated in court. Con: " And on to benghazi, once again what law are you arguing she broke? The idea of jeopardizing more American lives seemed like to great of a threat and after the attack began it was no longer in Clinton's power anyway, at that point it was a military decision which would fall to POTUS" If you had read my entire post you would have noticed this. "This leaves no doubt military assets were offered and ready to go, and awaiting State Department signoff, which did not come," Judicial Watch, a nonprofit government watchdog said in a statement." Who was the head of the state department at the time? Hillary Clinton was. Therefore by her not signing off on any document and or OKing military aide they were left there to die. "The idea of jeopardizing more American lives seemed like to great of a threat and after the attack began" Are you kidding me? Do you have any knowledge of American Military robotics and ordnance? These men who died were part of a highly elite seal team 6 platoon. There were 160 green beret units on tarmac less than 900 miles away. Less than a 3 hour ETA. http://www.breitbart.com... http://www.foxnews.com... The pentagon as stated in my previous sources even wrote to the state department asking them to send units. These are specially trained marines. The opposing forces were half armed with fully loaded weapons. The other half had either broken weapons, and melee weapons. If you seriously doubt the prestige and effectiveness of the United States Marine Corps you seriously need to question why we are the most dominant military superpower in the world. We don't abandon our troops like that. Especially when an Ambassador is on the line. There were no reports of it being "too great of a threat" I would like to see your sources on that because I have found none. "What laws did she break" http://www.breitbart.com... "She was investigated, and found not to have broken any laws by an independent agency that does not answer to anyone outside of the FBI." She is now under re-investigation. For the umpteenth time if you would actually take the time to read my entire post you would have seen that. The FBI in fact does answer to entities outside of the FBI itself. https://www.fbi.gov... What does the FBI do with information and evidence gathered during an investigation? "If a possible violation of federal law under the jurisdiction of the FBI has occurred, the Bureau will conduct an investigation. The information and evidence gathered in the course of that investigation are then presented to the appropriate U.S. Attorney or Department of Justice official, who will determine whether or not prosecution or further action is warranted. Depending on the outcome of the investigation, evidence is either returned or retained for court." This therefore means that all information found MUST be presented to a U.S. Government attorney that will decide the outcome of the evidence. The FBI has no authority over prosecution. The Gov. Does. Almost anyone can be bought and paid for. Political bribery is common among the democratic party. This is getting off topic. You don't have to refute this point. I was just addressing a quote from your rebuttal.