The Immaculate Conception is biblically accurate

Thanks Geogeer. I would like the voters to notice that I passed the previous round instead of round 3, so don't count the forfeiture against me.Introduction:My duty here is to show that the Immaculate Conception is not biblically accurate. Seeing that Pro is the one making the assertion, he has the BOP, and I have the duty to refute his arguments.To win this debate, I must provide Bible verses that show that Mary sinned in her life.Pro's argumentsI. 4th Commandment"Now if God places such an emphasis on honouring our parents, how much more would He honour His earthly mother? If God is perfect, would he not honour his mother perfectly? Would He not bestow every grace at His disposal to honour her as only God could?" Sure, He would honor her perfectly, but not every grace would be bestowed to her just because she is His mother. She would have to be a believer/one of the elect for God to bestow saving grace (1), which is not contingent on her motherhood. After all, given Geogeer's Catholic beliefs I believe that he adheres to salvation by grace through faith and works (2), and obviously God would not bestow her saving grace just for being the mother of Jesus (because, well, solely being His mother does not equal salvation by grace through faith and works). If that were the case, then even pro's beliefs would be violated.The main point is that her being honored perfectly does not mean that she did not sin in her life.II. Full of GraceThe problem is that the word "kecharitomene" does not mean "full of grace." It means "highly favored", "make graceful", etc. (3-4). Surely, Mary would be a highly favored and a blessed woman, considering that she had the privilege to give birth to the King of kings, but this does not mean she is "full of grace". The Bible translation does not give any indication about that. Even Pro's breakdown of the word doesn't show that she was full of it. The act of receiving grace itself might be intense (the verb of giving it could be intense, but the possession of grace is not full), but that doesn't mean that she herself was full of grace ITSELF. However, "plaras karitos" (plaras = full, karitos = grace) means "full of grace" in Greek, but this is not what's used in reference to Jesus' mother (5). Also, Geogeer's 6th source does not work.III. GraceI don't think I need to address this point so much, since this ties in with the point above. I have shown that the Bible does not say that Mary is full of grace, so this means that she did sin in her life.IV. Enmity Certainly, Genesis 3:15 is a prophecy regarding the Lord's provision for a Savior, but here is the reason why Pro cannot conclude that Mary was free from all sin: Romans 3:23 says that ALL have sinned (6) (with the exception of Jesus Christ, of course), and so does Ecclesiastes 7:20 (7). If Mary did not sin in her life, then that would flatly contradict the aforementioned verses, for they say that ALL have sinned. The word "ALL" includes Mary.V. ArkWell, the Ark of the Covenant is not holy substance-wise, because Romans 8:22 says that all of creation was affected due to the fall (8). So, when Pro compares the Ark of the Covenant with Mary's body, that doesn't help either, for that turns out to be a faulty comparison. This is because the sin nature is passed on from the father to his offspring (9). Jesus did not have a biological father, so He did not get the sin nature. Since Mary had a human father, she inherited the sin nature.VI. New EveMary cannot be the new Eve, because the original Eve was initially sinless. If I could demonstrate that Mary was unclean as opposed to sinless, then I could win this debate. Moreover, Eve's husband Adam was initially sinless, but Mary's husband Joseph wasn't sinless at all.If she was sinless and clean, then why did she offer a sacrifice for sin as per the laws of the Old Covenant?As per Leviticus 12:1-8 (10), a woman needs to get purified after giving birth. However, how could she not be clean if she is sinless?Here is a chart that compares Leviticus 12:1-8 and Luke 2:16, 21-24 (11). (Shout out to carm.org for this chart!!) Lev. 12:1-8, Luke 2:16, 21-24, 1 "Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, Birth of a Son 2 “Speak to the sons of Israel, saying: ‘When a woman gives birth and bears a male child, then she shall be unclean for seven days, as in the days of her menstruation she shall be unclean. 16 And they came in haste and found their way to Mary and Joseph, and the baby as He lay in the manger. Circumcision at Eight Days 3 ‘On the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised. 21And when eight days were completed before His circumcision, His name was then called Jesus, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb 33 Days 4 ‘Then she shall remain in the blood of her purification for thirty-three days; she shall not touch any consecrated thing, nor enter the sanctuary until the days of her purification are completed. 22 And when the days for their purification according to the law of Moses were completed, they brought Him up to Jerusalem to present Him to the Lord If she bears a female 5 ‘But if she bears a female child, then she shall be unclean for two weeks, as in her menstruation; and she shall remain in the blood of her purification for sixty-six days. 23 (as it is written in the Law of the Lord, “Every first-born male that opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord” ), Days of Purification 6 ‘When the days of her purification are completed, for a son or for a daughter, she shall bring to the priest at the doorway of the tent of meeting a one year old lamb for a burnt offering and a young pigeon or a turtledove for a sin offering. 22 And when the days for their purification according to the law of Moses were completed, they brought Him up to Jerusalem to present Him to the Lord. 7 ‘Then he shall offer it before the Lord and make atonement for her, and she shall be cleansed from the flow of her blood. This is the law for her who bears a child, whether a male or a female. Two Turtledoves or Two Pigeons 8‘But if she cannot afford a lamb, then she shall take two turtledoves or two young pigeons, the one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering; and the priest shall make atonement for her, and she will be clean.’” 24 and to offer a sacrifice according to what was said in the Law of the Lord, “A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.” Since I have demonstrated that Mary is not the new Eve, everything else that Geogeer said falls apart.Conclusion:1. I have showed that Jesus Christ would certainly honor her perfectly, but that does not mean she would be full of grace.2. I have referred to Bible verses that indicate that ALL have sinned.3. I have showed that the word "kecharitomene" doesn't mean full of grace. 4. Lastly, I have showed a thorough chart showing that Mary was unclean.Thank you pro, and I hope and pray that God will bless you abundantly. Sources:1. http://www.gotquestions.org...2. http://www.gotquestions.org...3. Swanson, J., Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains: Greek New Testament, electronic ed., Oak Harbor: Logos Research Systems, 1997, kephale, GGK5923.4. Strong, J., Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, electronic ed., Ontario: Woodside Bible Fellowship, 1996, GK5487.5. http://carm.org...6. https://www.biblegateway.com...7. https://www.biblegateway.com...8. https://www.biblegateway.com...9. http://carm.org...10. https://www.biblegateway.com...11. http://carm.org...