The Theory of Evolution should be taught in Public Schools (in the United States)

Everything that my opponent rebutted me with is incorrect. He states that I have no points of my own. If he cared to register the point I made where I blatantly introduce the point as 'Evolution is not a proven fact, and certainly not a scientifically proven fact.' and then go on for about three paragraphs justifying and explaining my point to the best of my ability. I did not say that we should not teach our students science. Scientific facts are based on what you could say is 99.99% accuracy based on actual observation and concrete evidence. The fact that we have a digestive system is undeniable by any degree and, thus, is taught. The reason that science is taught is that there is nothing to oppose it, so despite not being 100% certainly a fact, it is 100% not disproved to be fact as yet, thus is taught. Syllabuses in science always change if a supposed fact turns out to be false and thus is constantly maintaining accuracy with what the present status of the scientific community has decided is to be taught at the time. This is nothing to do with evolution which is a theory involving a degree of assumption that is too great to be claimed as certain. I shall now quote one of my opponent's arguments word for word and then explain exactly why it is incorrect: "Since evolution is by far the explanation with the the most evidence to back it up, it should be taught in schools." Evolution is not, even by the slightest degree, the explanation regarding the origin of species with the most evidence to back it up. Also, even if it was this doesn't mean it should be taught in schools as it's still just a theory in the process of being considered certain enough to be fact. Evolutionists (commonly termed Darwinists or Darwinians) base their theory on fossil records, observation of natural selection and adaption within species and the fact that some species have extreme similarities in their DNA to other species. However, the leading rival to the theory of evolution, namely creationism, uses everything as its justification, now everything is far more evidence than a list of four. To justify my statement I shall define creationism and everything, then I shall use the definitions to explain why everything is involved in the theory. Creationism: The doctrine that matter and all things were created, substantially as they now exist, by an omnipotent Creator, and not gradually evolved or developed.[1] Everything: All that exists.[2] Creationism realizes that even to an atheist, everything comes from nothing, thus it was spontaneously created in an instant. So why can't all fossils, all relationships between animals, and everything else that makes the theory of evolution seem artificially accurate, be due to the created of all things by a predetermined being far beyond human imagination or explanation. The assumption that because we adapt, we evolve doesn't deny that all new species are predetermined by an ultimate creator, only that the creator may use natural selection as it's mechanism of creating. Additionally, you could have been created an instant ago, literally 100% possible, with false memories of everything and in a matrix where this debate has been happening but I am just a computerized entity that exists to oppose you in this current instant of the programming code of the virtual reality. Sources: [1] http://dictionary.reference.com... [2] http://www.merriam-webster.com...