If Atheists really believed in logic and science without deluding themselves they would go insane.

The comments have nothing to do with the actual debate so don't worry about that. There is very little content in my opponent's argument actually regarding the insanity of atheists so I will just quote out anything I can find regarding the actual topic and respond to it. "good is just a thing created by evolution to help us survive. Seriously, I'd like atheists to give me another explanation."Good was not created by evolution. Atheism has nothing to do with being good or bad. As an atheist being good or bad is a choice. Therefore atheists have free will. Being religious usually means that you are forced to be good. It tells you that you must behave in certain ways otherwise something will happen to you, ie. go to hell. This leads many theists to think that morality stems from God and that without religion and God people can no longer act morally. This claim is false. If you analyze the major religions in greater detail you will notice the flaws in their rules. Religions do not tell us to be good. Religion tells us to behead those that convert; to mock the disabled for people bad in their previous lives. Religion tells us to tell our children that if they decide to convert they will go to Hell for an eternity. " We give stuff names and then say what other stuff are according to them." Does this have any relevance to the topic that we are discussing? "No proof of other people even being conscious or experiencing the world in a remotely similar way you do."There is lots of evidence that other people are conscious. The most obvious evidence is that their behavior makes a lot more sense if you assume they are conscious, and doesn't make much sense at all if you assume they are not (1). Do you require further evidence? If the answer is yes then I will provide it: "1. Person A can’t teach person B what word W means, if A doesn’t know what W means. 2. One can’t know what ‘consciousness’ means if one is not conscious. From 1 and 2 => 3.Person A can’t teach person B what ‘consciousness’ means, if A isn’t conscious. 4.I learned word ‘conscious’ from the people in the linguistic community. From 4 and 3 => 5. People in the linguistic community are conscious. OK, now you know… you are conscious." (2) "Good and bad. Nothing."My opponent continues to make assertions. Although I will refute them, regardless. Consider what the world would be like if there were no traffic rules at all. Would people be able to travel by automobiles, buses and other vehicles on the roadways if there were no traffic regulations? The answer should be obvious to all rational members of the human species. Without basic rules, no matter how much some would like to avoid them or break them, there would be chaos. The fact that some people break the rules is quite clearly and obviously not sufficient to do away with the rules. The rules are needed for transportation to take place. Now apply this to good and bad. With good the world can run in an orderly fasion, bad is something that happens and causes chaos. It is stopped by the good (ie. justice system). They aren't meaningless. They shape society (3). "Knowledge nothing."I will quote from my importance of knowledge contention: "Knowledge is what allows us to drive cars instead of ride horses, it is what helps us survive far longer than we should, and knowledge is even what prevents us from making the same mistakes that we have made in the past." "You are just part of a bunch of organisms living on a floating rock. Wake up." This is exactly what atheists believe. They understand what we are and that is why they don't believe in God. We are organisms on a rock in the middle of nowhere. Why would God put us here? Since your beliefs are coinciding with atheism you are essentially either doing one of the following: a) Concedingb) Calling yourself delusional. Sources(1) https://www.quora.com...(2) https://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com...(3) http://www.qcc.cuny.edu...