Being innovative is more important than being right

Note: Please do not play the videos until instructed to do so . http://www.youtube.com... . http://www.youtube.com... Being right is precedent to innovation- As an artist myself[5], I'd like to think I'm pretty clever. Whenever I sit down at my computer and begin to draw, it's a very therapeutic experience that I enjoy a lot; I drew all the aforementioned pictures with mouse, so I'm even more proud of them because of that. I'd like to say that my little characters are even kind of cute -- that's because they're neotenous[6]. That's right guys, through science and exploration we've even been able to discover what makes something cute or not; when we see traits resembling our own offspring, we find them endearing, even if they're a bit unproportional. Art is symbolic and in order for it to truly resonate with someone, it must meet their aesthetic principles [5] . http://www.debate.org... [6] . http://en.wikipedia.org... Go ahead and watch the two videos now. Get my point? Music is amazing, but we tend to fall into a pattern and replicate things we've heard before. That's because music has a strong mathematical link[7]. There are certain tones and octaves we like more than others; which is why a good Killers song is relaxing, while a Nicki Minaj song is guilty pleasure you secretly love. [7] . http://www.math.niu.edu... As for the kid and her story? She at least needs to know an established language to tell her story, even if she doesn't have everything about it perfect. I'm not going to understand her is she just stares at me and makes far noises. So what about the conflict issue? It was dropped. What this means is that when we agree you need to know the right science, math, cord progression or color palette to create something -- then you're not going to be able to create whatever you want to create without those right things. Whether or not you understand why those are the right things or not they need to be right in order to work. A lead balloon isn't going to fly just because you want it to. One may not know why the grass is green and the trees are blue, but there is a reason for it. And with a little research and work, one can find the answer. As for that drawing board? I agree that it's important to find alternative fuel sources, but unless those sources work to fuel a vehicle simply attempting to use another fuel isn't innovative. Just because gas get expensive doesn't mean I'm going to be able to pour water into my tank and hope it works; I need to find the right engine configuration to turn that water into energy. Without the right science, innovation means nothing. Simply put, consideration of an alternative isn't enough; if it doesn't work it isn't right. I still show that being right is precedent to innovation, as not innovation exists unless the science behind it is right. As for math, it isn't a uniquely human conception. Take the Fibonacci spiral[8], although we gain an understanding of it through human devices, it isn't of human origin; however we have been able to appropriate it and use it to better our own understanding of mathematics[9] and put it to practical use. [8] . http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu... [9] . http://en.wikipedia.org... The point is that the Fibonacci spiral existed before mankind discovered it. creative and innovative things may have occurred without a full understanding of these conceptions, but they existed and dictate that innovation nonetheless. But what's more, being right can exist without innovation taking place; it must exist as physics are the laws of the universe -- however for innovation to take place it must fall within the parameters of rightness. In Conclusion, Innovation is important, but it cannot be more important than being right as it depends on being right to be innovative.