The Trinity is Biblical, Jesus is God

well hello again, sorry for the delay, since i'm not english it takes more time for me to type and follow correct grammar (hopefully!) in response to your first paragraph i can say: since bible and other divine books are supposed to be a guideline for people to follow, it has to make sense and be logical to the people. otherwise what's the point of making a guideline that no one can understand and relate to? as for the second paragraph, you argue that Supernatural things don't conform to man's logic but can do things beyond our ability to comprehend. well didn't god create logic in the first place? didn't he give it to men? would god create something that even he doesn't care about? can't i just say to him in the day of judgement, oh god, you have created me and have given me intelligence and wisdom, yet you sent a book to me that does not make any sense, and since i did not saw jesus and could not prove that he existed without using that book, i decided that it was all man made? for the third, you say: why didn't God empower him to heal? not only Muhammad, but all of the Imams could heal and revive. they are healing people even after their death. haven't you heard about people who are healed in the shrine of Imam Hussein and Abbas ibn Ali who wasn't even Imam but son of Imam? even people who aren't Islam come to their shrines and ask for help. "You claim that logic tells you that God exists, but you won't use religious texts. So why wouldn't a logical God want to have his revelation written down so that all can see it, even if they are not opening their hearts to hear his voice? " well, since you are not muslim, what is the point of using text that you don't care about? i have to first be able to prove the things i say with reason and logic, then after acceptance, there are a lot of text for further guidance. It's so amazing you put so much stock in Islam's claim that Jesus didn't die but was raised to God... there are a couple of reasons for it. 1- we have a very detailed study of all historians of Islam and those who cited Hadith called "Rejal which means men" and in Islam, no hadith or history that is only mentioned by one historian, is not accepted. 2 - history of Islam is way more recent than history of Christianity, and is mentioned by a lot of more historians and people. 3- i know that i am not god, so i can't take god as my role model. because if god where to ask me in the day of judgement, why didn't you follow his example, i could easily say, he was a god, and i am a man, and there is no way that i could become god. why didn't you send an infallible man go guide us? and god would have no answer to that. also, if we are to use religious text i could say: "That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not" and don't you have verses saying something like this (I'm translating it from Persian so the words might not match) god has ordered his angels to protect him. mathew 6:4 and also a text saying that "he who is hanged (crucified?) is damned? Book of Deuteronomy 23:21 or this. "he was damned for us" Epistle to the Galatians 13:3 if he is god, how is he damned, and by whom? and if god ordered angels to protect him, how was he crucified? again, translations might vary. you said: "So the Quran can't be the Word of God because history proves it wrong." what history are we talking about here? don't just say something and expect us to take it as proven! as i mentioned, history cited by numerous historians proves that Quran was word of god. and also it invites all people to try to bring a book similar to it. which after this long time no one has managed to do. and one last thing. from what i hear, bible that you have is not a book that is written or cited or gathered by Jesus himself?