Science is the greatest integrator of human societies

Ok, so I actually wanted to ask you whether it is okay to elaborate on one point per round, but you don"t seem to be accepting messages right now so I will continue with the way you are debating right now. 1. I do agree that if one does take in too much antibiotics, it will cause bacteria to become antibiotic-resistant, but having a mutation is a little bit extreme. Furthermore, cures and treatments does not just include drugs, it also actually includes surgery and other methods. I shall elaborate more on surgery this round. Surgery, is a branch of medicine that is concerned with the treatment of injuries, diseases, and other disorders by manual and instrumental means. Surgery involves the management of acute injuries and illnesses as differentiated from chronic, slowly progressing diseases, except when patients with the latter type of disease must be operated upon. Such diseases are normally incurable or hard to cure by taking drugs. With the advancement of technology, the risks of having your brain or other vital body parts has been massively decreased. Before, surgery was so scary and dangerous that patients who suffer these diseases will prefer to live to the end of their lifespan instead of risking a 1 percent chance. With more advanced machinery, more people suffering from these diseases will be cured, thus saving more lives. 2. I noted that you said that the increase in transport infrastructure will lead to severe problems like pollution and global warming. Well the thing is, the temperature of the world has already been slowly raising through the years, which is scientifically proven (even without cars and other vehicles), so the issue cannot be totally blamed on the increase in transport infrastructure. These transport infrastructure actually connect the world together, as we can travel to the other countries by air, land or sea. This brings people of different cultures/religions, backgrounds, race and personality together. By being able to communicate with different people, we get to view the world in a broader perspective and be able to be more accepting of people that are different from us. I have other points that I would be elaborating more in the next round. 3. I understand that the existence of social media and online chatting platforms has decreased interaction face-to-face, but this is not really true. There are things online, that can both beneficial and detrimental in certain ways. Social networks are one of the fastest growing industries in the world, and is a good platform for social media marketing. This will further benefit the economy of the country as many people spent most of their time online. Social media marketing increases ones brand"s awareness. 78 % of small businesses use social media to attract new customers. Furthermore 33% of customers have identified social media as how they identify new brands products and services. Social media marketing helps to validate ones brand. A company"s social media presence, when done correctly, tells consumers that their brand is active and focused on thriving communication with consumers. 63% of consumers who search for businesses online are more likely to use ones with an informative social media presence. Social media marketing has the power to increase customer loyalty. 71% of consumers who received a quick response on social media would recommend the brand to others. Well, another thing that I want to talk about (I am not going to elaborate) is using social media to raise awareness. It may be true that only a small portion of people actually care about the campaigns, but social media platforms are not the one way that one can raise awareness. One can create new websites, or post on news platforms to raise awareness. 4. I understand that the places that need GM food the most aren"t getting it, but this is not related to the topic we are debating about. We are debating about science, technology, but the issue you are bringing up is more social than scientific. If the goods do not go where they are supposed to go, then it is the government"s duty to ensure that they get there, and they can monitor this y using scientific inventions like the CCTV, or by making video/phone calls with the ones in charge. Science is actually a double-edged sword. It has its own advantages and disadvantages. (P.S. If you don"t mind, could you leave a line between paragraphs/points because it would be easier for me to read. Thank you so much.)