Carly Fiorina would make a better president than all other candidates.

Con thank you for the argument! Trump is an aggressive candidate to say the least, now with an aggressive candidate you will have high amounts of opposition in the House of Representatives as well as Congress. To be a good president you need not only have plans of grandeur but have the capacity and ability to uphold those plans. Donald Trump has defined his plans a bit more clearly as of late, however the implementation is still extremely questionable. Rebuttal 1 If China is declared a currency manipulator by the United States, China can simply rebuttal by calling upon our debts. There is no bargaining table that China does not have ownership of, by owning 21% of our public debts they hold the highest percentage of debts for the United States. (1) Being the majority shareholder Mr. Trump would be wise to understand that this gives you quite a bit of power. The idea of China being a currency manipulator is not only senseless in voicing, it is also an erroneous claim. The Chinese are not manipulating their currency, if China has manipulated its currency through the monetary policy set forth then the EU has also done the same with their currency through the same monetary policies. For some reason the platform Mr. Trump is positioning himself on is a very thin one, not having sufficient depth in the knowledge of monetary policy or global trade. "Movements in the nominal Yuan exchange rate have almost no long-term impact on global flows of exports and imports or on broader considerations such as average wages. The exchange rate that matters for trade flows is the real exchange rate, i.e.., the nominal exchange rate adjusted for local-currency prices in both countries." (2) Take a page from history with the U.S., Japanese trade deficit, from 1970 to 1995 the deficit rose from $1.2 billion to $59.1 billion. In the same turn the dollar depreciated against the Yuan from 2004 to 2014, by 25%. Over that decade the trade deficit rose from $161.9 billion to $342.6 billion. Rebuttal 2 There is not a way to force the Chinese arm in intellectual property dealings. Mr. Trump plans to make this demand through military force stating: He said he would bolster the US military presence in the East and South China Seas to discourage Chinese adventurism. "These actions will discourage Chinese adventurism that imperils American interests in Asia and shows our strength as we begin renegotiating our trading relationship with China." (3) A show of military force is not going to get us anywhere in diplomatic negotiations. Rebuttal 3 China is not the only place labor is outsourced to, Mexico, Brazil, India and a number of additional countries are big buyers in the business of American jobs. Reviving American manufacturing is a beautiful idea, in practice it will be cut down as soon as it starts. You can not simply revive an industry that has been suffering for years, not only is the revival improbable, but assuming that the manufacturing industry is revived who is to take the jobs? The American unemployment is at 4.9% as of February 2016. (4) Rebuttal 4 Repealing Obamacare is another of Mr. Trumps plans that will sit on a bill and never leave that bill with anything more than a no as the answer. The mandate for each person to purchase health care or have health care is the only thing keeping the poor from slipping through the cracks. I look forward to the Con's rebuttals! 1. http://www.justfacts.com... 2. http://fee.org... 3. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com... 4. http://www.bls.gov...