Vladimir Putin is a Beneficial President to Russia

My opponent argues his case with several logical fallacies. First, he uses a continuum fallacy, that according to Wikipedia (F) "causes one to erroneously reject a vague claim simply because it is not as precise as one would like it to be. Vagueness alone does not necessarily imply invalidity." The second is attacking the argument, not rebuttal of the claims. Putin's support for Victor Yanukovych, the corrupt former Ukrainian president, has demonstrated his own corruption. He is supporting a man who redirected state income to his own personal zone (B). Yanukovych has embezelled 70 billion dollars to offshore accounts, yet claims that it was "declared on my taxes" (C). For this, Interpol declared him a wanted person on charges of misappropriation of property. Putin is harboring a man who owns a mansion with gazelles and peacocks while his country is just starting to slowly crawl out of a recession (D). His mansion cost $100 million to build, while Ukraine"s per capita GDP is $7,300. Putin is explicitly showing his support for someone who spent the same as over 13,000 people"s contribution to GDP. If that isn"t supporting corruption, I don"t know what is. On another continent, he supports Xi Jinping. This is the man who is creating a personality cult to rival Mao. Xi is censoring free media (E) and expecting acceptance from Western figures. In a document circulated by members of China"s Communist Party, there are seven values that are "dangerous Western values". These are: constitutional democracy, universal values of human rights, civil society, pro-market neo-liberalism, media independence, historical nihilism [criticisms of past errors], and questioning Reform and Opening [the Chinese Communist agenda]. This is something that Putin is supporting with his support for Xi. By these standards, all citizens should be robots marching and waving a flag bearing the hammer and sickle. This is not something that should be. Each person is individual, and any attempt to make them act or be otherwise is contrary to millions of years of evolution. A final thing that Putin shows his support for is the Imperialist attitude of Xi and others. In a trial, China"s campaigns in the South China Sea were declared illegal, yet Xi and his country continue to maintain their "nine dash line". China doesn"t just want to be a global superpower, it wants to be the largest. And Putin is endorsing this. Make of that what you will. Putin's invasions of Georgia and Ukraine are also fueled by nostalgia for the Soviet era. Let me point out that in both situations, Putin isn't trying to support the government of the country my opponent stated to be in Russian interests. Putin is supporting separatists, not the established government. His efforts to reunite the former Russia have only fractured countries. And also, Russian interests are contrary to those of the countries in question. Out of the former Soviet bloc and sphere of Soviet interest, there have been (after the Soviet era) 2 civil wars, 3 revolutions, and a total 2 armed conflicts, with many involving Russia. (G.) After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has been involved in 13 different armed conflicts, 11 of which are in the region of the former USSR. (H.) Russia's "interests" have ended in the splitting of numerous nations, the Imperialistic conquests of the South China Sea, and the terroristic Hezbollah. Sources: B..https://en.wikipedia.org... C.https://www.washingtonpost.com... D.https://www.washingtonpost.com... E.https://en.wikipedia.org... F.https://en.wikipedia.org... G. https://en.wikipedia.org... H. https://en.wikipedia.org...