Rights and Freedoms Are Officially Unalienable

Freedoms and rights are all superficial and fake. I find it odd how people constantly try to fight for theirs and other peoples' rights and freedoms, or when (no offense, I do mean it) people in less fortunate countries attempt to stand up against injustice by protesting for freedoms and rights. There are no such thing as complete freedoms and rights where we are all completely free and have rights at once; not only is it illogical, it also is impossible for freedoms and rights to exist and not be able to be violated and/or taken away. Such rules would actually destroy a society if all have unlimited freedoms and rights that cannot be taken away and are just as precious of that of being a king. Rights are all made up by humans and are not natural, as some people claim it to be. Do we see animals having rights and freedoms (that weren't made up by humans)? Do we see insects and micro-organisms having their own freedoms and rights? I think not. They were all made up by those of power and authority, mainly the government, and is only granted to us as long as we follow certain conditions and vary from place to place. As said before, what the government can give, they can also equally take away and we cannot do anything about it except for complaining (or how many people like to call it: protesting.) Even if they were, then why do they have to create laws so that they do not get violated? If those rights and freedoms were guaranteed to be not being violated, then why did the government have to make rules just so that they couldn't. You clearly don't need to protect something if it can already protect itself right (pun not intended)? Wrong! People around us will violate our rights and freedoms all the time, whether they want to or not, whether they know it or not. I don't know about you, but I am 100% certain that your rights are being violated all the time, like when people make fun of you, or when random strangers discriminate you, or when you get trolled online. Because if people like you and me actually notice and count the violations, it would actually quickly rise to a high number. We are not free to do as we please, because if we do, then we are violating other peoples' rights. But if they are our rights, then how can it be violation of others' rights? It's a complex paradox that is illogical, irrational, and just impossible. For example, I am free to say what I please, but I cannot discriminate, threaten, bully, or berate other people; if I do, then I just violated your rights and freedoms. But wait, didn't the government allow me to say what I please, no matter what circumstances it is? Clearly, they are exceptions to this; clearly, there are limitations that make them draw the line; and clearly, this ultimately means that freedoms and rights are given to a certain extent before they become wrongs and criminal activity. Going back to rights and freedoms protection laws, why are they even there in the first place? To protect us...protect us from what? Those so-called unalienable freedoms and rights are clearly able to be violated and stripped from us if they can, so why are there laws to prevent that? It's just like if scientists developed a cure for the cure because the cure can cure a certain disease or illness, but only to a certain extent such as if the illness gets too powerful. It's the cure, so it's impossible for the disease to stop that cure because it was purposely designed to naturally or artificially hunt it down as nothing else can, right? And do not argue that it is to protect us from criminals and other citizens, as we are discussing about how the government isn't authorized to violate them, not the common person. To finish off this argument, rights and freedoms also vary from place to place. If you go to a different country, then you automatically have different rights and freedoms. If they violate your rights and freedoms that you had in other countries, then they technically didn't, as they never violated it in that country which you had those rights and freedoms in. Another great example, you cannot discriminate against gays here but you can in the Middle East; does that mean I violated the gays' rights and freedoms because I discriminated against them? If in North America, Europe, and Australia, then yes; elsewhere, most likely no. If I protest against the Taliban there and they shoot me, they never violated my freedom of speech because they shot me there and not in places where you do have freedom of speech.