BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Lelouch vi Britannia would win against Eren Jaeger in a fight.

==Geass Counter== Lelouch's Geass can be countered by a simple pair of sunglasses. Assuming neither knows of the other's abilities, Eren likely wouldn't notice this. The more competent people he travels with (Levi, Misaka, etc) would easily notice such a thing. Given the information on his powers, Hange Zo" would easily be able to come up with a counter measure for Eren to use. Also! Eren in titan form can avoid direct eye contact all together, as he is simply controlling a giant puppet. Lelouch's Geass with requires direct eye contact can be disrupted by simple sunglasses (Note: Mao) as well as Eren's titan form. == Personality Counter== Lelouch cares deeply for his sister. All Eren would have to do is exploit this weakness. Once again, Eren travels with very skilled soldiers. These soldiers could easily track, and survey Lelouch's actions in a drawn out war. Such tracking would eventually lead them to Nunally, Lelouch's greatest weakness. Lelouch is also a fairly weak strategist. His most notable victories can be accounted to Brittania's blatant idiocy. They kept sending a pilot with a prior history of failure to carry out the same mission, never informed their soldier's of the enemies abilities, and allowed their underage nobility to manage major military operations. The tacticians on Erens side could easily out wit him, and their soldier's spirit can best the Black Knights. ==His Pistol== Nullified by the Titan ability's damage threshold. ==Arguments== -Eren is almost always followed by a trained group of soldiers, while Lelouch has no protection outside of a single ninja at school. -Eren can draw upon a greater number of allies. Along with the military of the Walls, Eren could also request the aid of Lelouch's enemies, Britannia. -Eren is in better physical shape. He also has better training. If the fight came down to a close quarter's fight, Eren would win. -Lelouch's shield's weaknesses according to the Wiki: "The Absolute Defense system has four known weakness. The Absolute Defense system must be turned off for weapons systems to be used. A high intellect is required to calculate the optimal positioning of the shields. Continual pressure from high-yield weaponry (like continuous point-blank exposure to the Mordred's Stark Hadron Cannon) will severely deplete energy reserves, and drastically decreasing the strength of the Absolute Defense System's shielding. An attack of high enough force over a small area (as shown by a salvaged half of the Excalibur) overwhelm the shielding at the point of contact, sapping the efficiency and effectiveness of the shield, which will lead to a structural collapse of the shield." Eren would simply have to continuously punch Lelouch or wait for his shield's batteries to run out. -Eren has an almost Wolverine healing level. No matter what Lelouch does, Eren would still have enough time to regenerate. () In the clip, he grows a new set of teeth after having them all kicked out. -Eren's team handles large and overwhelming enemies on a daily basis. ()
Lelouch vi Britannia would win against Eren Jaeger in a fight.

To start off I will address Lelouch's skills. ==Geass== Lelouch's Geass allows him to command anyone to do anything upon direct eye contact. It can be reflected as it is an optical ability.. His Geass has an approximately effective range of 270 meters. The subject also does not have memories about before, during, or after the power is used. http://youtu.be... ==Personality== Lelouch is highly intelligent, calm, and sophisticated. He has high charisma. When in battle he is cold and tactical, not caring about the deaths of any soldier or civilian. http://codegeass.wikia.com... ==His pistol== Lelouch, has a pistol that he carries around with him. The guns of Code Geass are different from guns in real life as they use electromagnetism instead of gun powder. Pistols are usually seen with a laser attachment. http://codegeass.wikia.com... Now, Eren. ==Personality== He is hardheaded, passionate, and compulsive. http://shingekinokyojin.wikia.com... ==Three Dimensional Maneuver Gear== Handgrips , Piston-shot grapple-hooks, Gas powered mechanism, Iron Wire Propeller with Plug in Blades. http://shingekinokyojin.wikia.com... ===Eren (Human) vs Lelouch/Zero (No Knightmare)=== Eren's compulsive nature would cause him to jump right into battle while Lelouch would be more cautious and wait back. As Eren's weapons require a close range Lelouch can both use his pistol or use his Geass before Eren could get close to him. In this fight they would not know each others strengths or weaknesses so Eren would not know about Lelouch's Geass, causing him not to be on his guard for that. Since Eren would not know about the Geass he would be vulnerable to it while charging at Lelouch, where Lelouch would only need to command Eren to die and the fight would be over. ==Lelouch's Knightmare Frame, the Shinkiro.== It can turn into a jet or a submarine to travel in the air or under water. It contains the Absolute Defense System, the strongest shield in the world. It has 2 wrist mounted Hadron Canons, which is similar to a particle canon. It has a Chest-mounted Diffusion Structure Phase Transition Cannon. It contains 2 Slash Harkens in the knees. http://codegeass.wikia.com... ==Eren as Titan== 15 meters tall. He is well proportioned and seems more physically fit than the typical Titan. http://shingekinokyojin.wikia.com... ===Titan form vs Knightmare Frame=== Based off of the battle between Eren and the female Titan () we can tell that Eren is not strong enough to break through the Female Titan's hardening ability. Based off of this we can draw the conclusion that he would not be able to get through the Shinkiro's Absolute Defense System. We can also see that the Shinkiro's weaponry is devastating (http://youtu.be...). Shinkiro can also fly, meaning that it can stay out of the range of Eren. With Lelouch not caring about the lives of anyone he could easily use the Shinkiro to kill Eren as a Titan, not even caring much about the damage he causes. Eren would have to find a way past the Shinkiro's defense in order to do anything to Lelouch. This would end with Lelouch in victory.
Lelouch vi Britannia would win against Eren Jaeger in a fight.

Lelouch vi Britannia (Code Geass) vs Eren Jaegar (Attack on Titan) This fight will be as if they never met before, so they do not know about the other sides strengths or weaknesses. If Eren Jaegar can use his Titan form then Lelouch can use his Knightmare. Round 1-Acceptance Round 2-Initial Arguments Round 3-More Arguments and Rebuttals Round 4-No Arguments, Finals Rebuttals, Conclusion Use sources! ***Note*** This is my first debate, so sorry if I make any mistakes or errors.
Is there any viable, provable evidence for evolution

While my opponent forfeited the last round, I will take this time to clarify the debate, as well as provide some suggestions to the voters. First off, in order to understand what my opponent and I are arguing, it is essential to understand that in order to prove that evolution is not viable, my opponent needed to provide a counter-theory that was equally if not more viable. While he failed to do so explicitly, throughout the debate I operated under the assumption he was advocating a Christian/Biblical Creation theory. Even if you regard all of the other evidence and counter-evidence specifically in regards to evolution, it remains the only viable alternative, as any other explanation was not provided. Beyond this, in order for evolution to be Provable, it must align with scientific principles. Proof, as it is used in science, is not necessarily empirically proven, it can be extrapolated from empirically confirmed evidence. As macro-evolution applies the empirical evidence of macro-evolution into a larger context, it is scientifically provable. Moving past the theory of the debate, it can be plainly seen that enough evidence exists for macro-evolution. I have proven evolution is viable through Atavisms, The Common Ancestor, Genetic Regression, The Fossil record, and species such as the Titalic fish. Not only that, but I have effectively disproved any counter-theories my opponent has provided, especially Noah's flood. So in the end, you must support the pro side of the debate, not only due to empirical evidence but also due to my consistency with the very way the question is framed. When evaluating this debate, I ask that you, as voters, disregard all of your prior beliefs, be they for or against evolution, and evaluate the debate based solely on the arguments presented within.
Is there any viable, provable evidence for evolution

As my opponent was unable to make an argument for his last round, I will also forgo this round, for two reasons: First, I dont want it to be unfair at all, and Second, I am arguing that there is no viable evidence for evolution, so I can not really present arguments, but refute the evidences my opponent presents and show how they are either false, or do not prove what he says they do. I have presented all of my reasons why his arguments and proofs so far do not prove evolution, and thus I do not have an argument for this round as he did not present any new proofs.
Is there any viable, provable evidence for evolution

Yes. But first, some observations of the round: A: My opponent must advocate a viable counter-theory. If they cannot do so, they are free to attack evolution without any ground to stand upon. B: Evidence must be used in the round as "Consistent with Scientific Principle", meaning it must be both derived from verifiable observation and make an accurate prediction that is not only valid in pre-existing circumstances. Evolution is Viable and Provable for 3 reasons: First: Without evolution, there are no verifiable scientific phenomenon that can explain the gaps in the fossil layers. In the absence of Macro evolution, there is no valid theory that can explain in any more certainty the existence of these gaps. while admittedly very geographically diverse, this diversity in the Fossil layers serves as evidence that micro-evolution is valid. As I have shown that Evolution is both viable and provided one of many examples of proof fro macro evolution, and my opponent is not advocating a counter-position, it is clear that the Con will carry the round. Second: The theory of evolution is consistent with scientific principles, and is thus viable. The theory has not been around long enough to prove macro-evolution, yet one key aspect of the scientific method is the application of principles from a controlled small-scale to a large scale. The application of the concept of Micro-evolution to Macro-Evolution is one that is not only consistent with scientific thought Third: Existing evidence is consistent with the application of micro-evolution. The existence of Atavisms in both humans and animals is proof of a shared genetic heritage. Mutations in gene sequences can result in previously unused DNA being replicated. Some prominent examples include dolphins and whales born with leg-like apparatuses near their tails and human newborns growing a natural tail as a result of prematurely limited regression of genes. This shared genetic evidence confirms that adaptation from an original organism can result in significantly different species.
Is there any viable, provable evidence for evolution

I am arguing that there is no viable evidence for evolution. For clarification, I mean macro-evolution, change from one species to another, not micro-evolution, or adaptation. My argument is that there is no evidence for evolution. First off, the fossil record does not prove evolution for two reasons. This is because the fossil record is extremely faulty and is different every different place that it is found. There is rarely any correlation between them. Also, the fossil record shows no change between species. To put it in layman's terms, there are no missing links. If evolution happened over billions of years, the number of in-between animals, the number of animals that were changing between species should be as many or more than the number of animals that were staying the same. This is because evolution is supposedly a gradual process, something that takes small changes in a species over and over until it is a large change. There is no evidence of that. All the fossil record proves is that the dead animals stay the same until the next one magically appears.
WHAT IS THE BEST POP TART FLAVOR!?! Brown Sugar Cinnamon(PRO) or Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough(CON)

Since measuring solely by taste this question is too subjective to each person, I shall objectively prove that Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough pop-tarts, are superior to Brown Sugar Cinnamon pop-tarts.First of all one witness described eating Brown Sugar Cinnamon (pro's choice) as "I honestly feel like I'm eating a bag of brown sugar every time I take a bite." Please note that is a bag per bite. Please go to your kitchen and open a bag of brown sugar (any size), and consume it without stopping to drink anything. Now please repeat this with other bags until you've taken as many bites as it takes you to consume a single pop-tart. Assuming you are not in a diabetic coma, try to imagine repeating that whole process as a regular part of your morning breakfast. As the flavor matching that of a bag of brown sugar is clearly lacking in many areas, including variety of texture (save dry graininess), please look at this picture: Not only does it have texture variety and the taste of uncooked cookies, it is a good source of 7 vitamins and minerals. In addition it is more healthy, having less calories, less fat, far less saturated fat. Compare the nutritional information for yourself: Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough[1] versus Brown Sugar Cinnamon [2]. Those extra sugar calories, contribute to hyper-activity, and according to a recent study by the American Academy of Pediatrics may be linked with AHAD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [3]).Sources:[1] http://www.rwservices.poptarts.com...[2] http://www.rwservices.poptarts.com...[3] http://pediatrics.aappublications.org...
WHAT IS THE BEST POP TART FLAVOR!?! Brown Sugar Cinnamon(PRO) or Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough(CON)

Extend all arguments...Closing remarks:I admit I was hoping to aim this into a funny talk about how more calories is better, due to starvation rates. In addition to my diabetic comments countered with something about poptarts being a cheap source of glucose when someone overdoses on insulin.Anyway if you ever want help refining an idea for an argument, don't be a stranger.
The Biblical case for support of homosexuality.

Okay, So I wish Backwardseden never accepted this debate because it seems that he can't refute my arguments and thus I won't get to have the critical discussion I was hoping to have. 1. One does not need to have sex to know their sexual orientation. 2. My opponent's paragraph has doesn't have a point that can be derived from it except that my opponent doesn't under Biblical Theology. 3. A note for all. While there may be different translations among each version of the text you WILL find that the general message of the text is still there. In my opponent's listed verses one can still derive a discussion on homosexuality from each and every version. So my opponent is wasting my time and theirs. 4. My opponent is insulting and rude! I am here to argue that there is a place for HBTQ2+ people in the Church that is not negative and opposed to them. Blessings.
Are we losing our privacy

You have brought up 2 significant points - internet security and the feeling of insecurity. Internet Security. As far back as 1890, Louis D. Brandeis and Samuel D. Warren warned of the dangers that technology posed for privacy: "Instantaneous photographs and newspaper enterprise have invaded the sacred precincts of private and domestic life; and numerous mechanical devices threaten to make good the prediction that ‘what is whispered in the closet shall be proclaimed from the house-tops'." For example you get an embarrassing photo taken at a party. A decade ago, there would have been an assumption that it might be circulated among friends. But now the assumption is that it may well end up on the internet and be viewed by strangers. It is not only you but also your friends & colleagues who may upload such information with or without your consent. Many times there isn't an option to customize your privacy settings on networking sites.There are also various companies which keep vast databases of their customers many a times without the consent or knowledge of the user. Insecurity. let me give 3 examples to show how insecurity has led the breach of Privacy. 1.The FBI appears to have begun using a novel form of electronic surveillance in criminal investigations: remotely activating a mobile phone's microphone and using it to eavesdrop on nearby conversations. The technique is called a "roving bug". This leads to all kinds of questions about privilege (you know, lawyer/client - doctor/patient - husband/wife, stuff like that) and the potential abuses. http://news.zdnet.com... 2.Next we have security screening at airports. The TSA has just given me another reason to hate airports. I love to fly, but hate getting to the plane. It is the part about being treated guilty until proving yourself innocent that gets my goat. They have gone a step ahead with the 360 degree x-ray scanner.which basically reveals everything but in blue.So, who wants to bet on who gets randomly screened the most - Busty babes, or men of Middle Eastern decent between the ages of 20 and 35? My money is on the babes. 3.Surveillance cams an be misused & pose a threat to privacy. We have observed what happens when societies turn to inappropriate intrusion into private life, into concentrating on security and intelligence, into making every third person into a spy on everyone from their own family to those that they work and live amongst. We saw it on the other side of the Iron Curtain. And it didn't work there because the human spirit realized there was a better way of conducting our societies, one that does not protect us from every single risk, one that has required us to take responsibility and some courage, but one through which the human spirit survives and indeed thrives. It is not about reducing any of our human expectations. raising our game and raising our respect for humanity and human rights and, throughï¿½that,ï¿½raisin
Are we losing our privacy

First, one must examine the reasons why society is losing a sense of privacy. Are we losing is consensually? Is the internet a gateway in others lives? Well, if the internet were a significant means for loss of privacy it was most likely caused by the person releasing information. Of course, some people engage in illegal activities such as identity theft and fraud, however if we focus on legal forms of privacy loss we can truly get to the root of this issue. Websites such as Facebook, Formspring, YouTube, Myspace, MSN, and countless other social networking sites that display personal information publically, enables others to lose privacy. So, if we are losing privacy it is our own fault in this sense. Other privacy loss may not be given up willfully. For example, cities like New York and Los Angeles are filled with hundreds of thousands of video cameras that are accessible to government officials at local, state, and national levels. This advancement of technology may have caused our lives to become more public, yes, but in a changing and increasingly challenging world, we must alter our traditional values to survive in a modern world. Privacy loss in this sense is due to issues in security and crime. In a utopian society, there would be no need for such things but there would also be no need for privacy if the world and its inhabitants were inherently perfect. This is not the case. We give up our privacy and other times we allow it to be violated. We are only losing our privacy as fast as we are willing to give it up. I thank you for bringing up the interesting topic of discussion/debate. I look forward to your response and hope that my arguments simply provoke thought. Thank you.
is evolution real

To answer your questions, let me just say this. In this world we have many complex forms of life, such as microscopic organisms, plants, and animals. All of which have various functions, parts, and criteria which makes them the most complex things on earth. Now lets compare this to evolution and I will show how evolution is impossible. The theory of evolution states that a singular cell is the result of this entire universe. Where did the cell come from? To this question I would like to have an answer to. The evidence that supports evolution is evidence that supports what happened after the cell was created, but it never says how the cell was created in the first place. They say that life was created from dead matter. But back to my point about the complexity of life. Dead matter cannot have possibly created all of this complex life that we have today. For one it goes against the law of biogenesis which states that all life comes from life. Evolution states that this cell that created the whole earth originated from a dead substance. This contradicts one of the most well known laws of science. Life is so complex that it is unreasonable to believe that dead substances could have created this cell which created this world we have today. Another flaw in evolution is the process of how the world evolved from a single cell. It says that the cell reproduced until we have this world today. But how could one cell, created so many different life forms such as plants, animals, and humans. Why aren't all of the living species the same as the first living cell. It just doesn't makes sense. Now to answer the question about there being no evidence for God. There actually is. Although it is not direct evidence, it is still evidence. There is no theory, religion or belief that answers the question reasonably about where the first life form came from other than Christianity. This belief clearly states, unlike evolution, where life came from and how it started. God created all of the plants, animals, and humans that exist today. For this reason, I stand by my belief that evolution is false.
Rap, excluding hip hop and other variations of Rap, is not music.

Rap is simple, but it still fits the 4 elements of music my opponent agreed to. These are rhythm, melody, harmony, and color. If these are present, then rap is music. Rap has: Rhythm- words are said in determinate patterns Melody- one voice with the only tune Harmony- does not apply to any solo composition Color- if the above three are put together you get color Definition from of www. dictionary. com Thank you all for reading. I urge you
Rap, excluding hip hop and other variations of Rap, is not music.

I appologize for the previous argument. Rap is not music. I myself listen to it and also listen to very complicated Music with Chord structure, Progression. Rap has no right to be in the musical category. Rap is simply, simple. I do admit that not all music is complex but Rap goes so low in simplicity it's hard to let it stay in the category of Music. I do enjoy Rap myself but I believe it could become more popular if it goes into it's own category. It deserves to be in it's own category.
Rap, excluding hip hop and other variations of Rap, is not music.

;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasldkjffffffffffffffffffpewaoisjdfpoaisdjf;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasldkjffffffffffffffffffpewaoisjdfpoaisdjf;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasldkjffffffffffffffffffpewaoisjdfpoaisdjf;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasldkjffffffffffffffffffpewaoisjdfpoaisdjf;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasldkjffffffffffffffffffpewaoisjdfpoaisdjf;aa THIS IS WHAT RAP IS TO ME!