"Celebrating Diversity" is a program of white genocide/Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

Reponses to rebuttals My opponent argued "Please forgive my opponent for insulting your intelligence. Members of ddo know the difference between someone killing a person to get $100 out of his wallet and a government or other large group killing "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a ...racial...group." Members of ddo also know that crime is commited by members of all racial groups including Whites. The absence of non-Whites certainly does not insure the absence of crime!" My opponent acknowledges that killings of whites has occurred as a direct result of non-white immigration and "assimilation" being imposed on the white population.The genocide law has no stipulation that a "government or other large group" must carry out the killings. My opponent seems to be insulting the intelligence of ddo members by implying that killings of whites by non-whites is only ever a by-product of acts of robbery. My opponent argued "Demonize White historical achievement? Every child in the public schools of the Western world takes history classes. They recieve text books that are filled with the names and faces of White people. The few non-White people in these books are often named as enemies. Only until the last few decades has there been an attempt to correct this text book problem." For the largest majority white country on Earth it would be right and proper if the children receive books filled with the names and faces of white people,the same way that Chinese history books are filled with the names and faces of Chinese historical figures. White historical achievement such as colonialism,industrialism, and even the creation of this country are never presented as "white achievements",they are often presented as negative impacts on non-whites and on the environment.My opponent acknowledges that for decades "a text-book problem" has been perceived by so-called "anti-racist" educators and that there has been "attempted" "corrections". My opponent argued "First of all, as stated in the second round, I don't know how other nations do; but, Americans invite immigration." You claim that white Americans invited mass non-white immigration upon themselves? That would only be true if there had been a national debate and democratic choice on the matter.In fact it was never put to a vote,not just in the USA,but in every "Western"(read white) country on Earth. My opponent argued "Because "White" governments WANT to be "assimilated" and immigrated! Governments in the Western world are democratic and are elected by the White people in them. You are proving that "anti-racist" is indeed "anti-racist," and not "anti-White" because White people VOTE otherwise." From my round two opening paragraph: "the white genocide program that so-called "anti-racist" elites have imposed on every "Western" i.e traditionally white country." It is good that my opponent agrees with me that the governments/elites of white countries DO want their white populations to be "assimilated and immigrated" by non-whites i.e white genocide.As already mentioned,there is a severe democratic deficit if all the political parties refuse any debate and democratic choice on "Celebrating Diversity".There is no "democratically authorised" clause in the genocide law that allows one section of the population to vote for acts of genocide for all.A democratic vote does not in any way make an act of genocide lawful. My opponent argued "Celebrating diversity" in no way comes close to the atrocities mentioned in the genocide convention definition! As I mentioned in the second round, "you don't know what 'genocide' is!" I put it to you,that it is you who does not know,or will not admit,what does or does not constitute an act of genocide. Maybe an analogy will be helpful to you.Imagine that there is a small island nation inhabited exclusively by one racial group.Imagine that the governing elite of the island who call themselves "anti-racist" then start a program of continuous colonisation of the island by people of another racial group.The elite describes this new demographic reality as "Celebrating Diversity". The island elite tell the "old islanders" that even though this colonisation will result in their eventual extinction as a group they must not object,and if they do object they will be called "evil racists" and suffer official sanctions. The deliberate attempted replacement of the original islanders with "new islanders" is an act of genocide. The deliberate attempted replacement of whites with non-whites that is taking place in every "Western"(read white) country is also an act of genocide.