Israel Had a Right To Come Into Existence In 1948

Emil has used the tired old flimsy Zionist talking points to make excuses for the removal of indigenous native people from the land of their birth. 1. She callously disregards the natives humanity by claiming that they have not a government so they don't really exist. 2. She claims that the land was sparsely populated 3. She relies on UN resolution 4. She claims that Israel had been in existence in the years leading up to 1948. All are invalid Point # 1. Emil claims the natives had no government so they had not any human rights. Sadly this is the brainwashing rhetoric that has been effectively fed to so many for so long. Using vernacular labeling or lack there of as a reason to discount the humans that were the Semitic natives of the land. I don't care if the Native population wanted to call themselves "Smurfs" it does not diminish the fact that each one of the natives are human with human rights. The right to property. The right to a democratic voice in government. The right to defense. The natives had to be dispossessed of their property, their resources and their democratic voice to make room for the multitudes of White European Jewish immigrants. Point # 2 Emil claims that the land was so sparsely populated that there was plenty of room for the White Jewish European immigrants. This claim is eerily familiar as related to the God given Manifest Destiny rational. The Manifest Destiny ideology is what allowed white Americans to morally excuse themselves for the crime of ethnic cleansing upon the American Indians. She attempts to back up her claims with quotes from renowned racists like Mark Twain. Who visited the land while it was still under the Heavy hand of the Ottoman Empire. She even uses quotes from centuries ago that are so old they have no bearing on the debate at Hand "Israel Had a Right To Come Into Existence In 1948". She claims a native population of 800,000 souls a number disputed, a number that will never be accurately known. She claims these indigenous people had no right to control immigration. That is like saying the USA should open its borders and allow 300 million immigrants to move on to our territory. How ever sad the plight of the Zionists was it in no way gave Zionists or the white nations of the U.N. the right to deny the 800 thousand natives their human rights. Point # 3 Emil claims that a United Nations non-unanimous decision had the power to override the right of democracy for the Semitic indigenous people of the Holy Land. The natives had every right to curtail immigration onto their territory. The U.N. resolution is moot regarding "Right" because no one, not even the U.N. has a right deny democracy to anyone. The U.N. resolution set up a system of democracy that was dependent on flawed census data. The truth is that the Jews were severely outnumbered in this volatile land. A truth that would be comically surprising to see Emil dispute. The demographics and population data vary wildly but it always shows that the Jews were a minority. After 1943 the numbers show a large increase in the number of Jews but remember they were illegal immigrants and even so still a significant minority. Imagine if the U.N. demanded that your nation gave citizenship to all the illegals that resided in your country. I doubt you would stand for that. So without the removal of native Semitic Muslims from the territory carved out for Jews the vote would have put an end to the Zionist theocracy. It is argued who attacked who first but that is clearly irrelevant in such a clear case of illegal immigration. We are talking about white people from thousands of miles away fighting with natives in their homeland. The aggressor is obvious. The aggressor is the one who traveled across the planet forcing their way into the land. The aggressor here was the Zionists. Aggression is wrong. You have not a right when you are wrong. The Zionists removed a quantity of Semitic Natives sufficient to feign a democracy. I say feign because you are not truly a democracy after you cleanse your territory denying the natives their god given right to a voice in the villages of their birth. Ethnic cleansing is wrong...period. Point # 4 To say that Israel existed is a fantasy. The nation may of existed in the hearts of people but so does the Kingdom of Hawaii. To consider the Kingdom of Hawaii a state in existence because people wish it so is really a stretch. A stretch beyond reality. So in this world Israel did not exist from the years around 100 ad to 1948 and at that time it was born without righteousness. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org...