The Existence of The Christian God

"you could have just saved your work and used it in your next response" It's impossible on the device I am on. "You think that it's perfect that man corrupts the world. This is not perfect; for God even regrets making man." No, I don't think the corruption of the world is perfect. I am saying that God giving man free-will is the best possible thing God could have done, since God is perfect. Genesis 6:6-7 says man GRIEVED God, and that he is SORRY (sad) that he made them. This does not mean giving free-will wasn't the best possible thing God could have done, it only means man's sin grieved God. "Okay... first of all, I can, and I will since God is extremely similar to humans." Humans are imperfect. God is perfect. If nothing man-made or man itself is imperfect, it doesn't effect God's perfection in the slightest. When it says God made man in his image, it is speaking of 1) The trinity and 2) Man's soul. We are 3 (Soul Spirit Mind) and one as God is, we are creative and intelligent as God is, and we have dominion over all the creatures of the Earth as God has dominion over everything. Point #1 First sentence = First sentence on point #1 = God created everything perfect, without any flaw. Part of the perfection of his creation is that man had free-will, and thus could corrupt the world. God created everything in the best way possible, and giving man free-will was the best thing God could have possibly done. Thus God retains his perfection. Thus your argument is invalid. Point #2 You said, "This is completely false. It"s like you are saying that there can be a married bachelor. It is contradictory, false, fallacy. What you say is completely false.". It is not like a marrired bachelor, it is simple logic. God can do anything, therefore God can know what sin feels like without sinning. Thus your argument is invalid. Point #3 "Where"s your evidence that God created time. Or that he lives outside it." The Universe is bound by time. God created the Universe. Therefore, God is not bound by time (Thus meaning he lives outside of it). Since God is not bound by time, and is omnipresent, he is everywhere, at every time period, all the time. This means, that to say, "this means that the being has no potential to avoid its choices", is inaccurate, because it doesn't fit within the nature of God, thus meaning that it cannot be used as a valid argument against the existence of God. Argument #1 You asked for the proof that God exists outside of the bounds of logic: The Universe is bound by the rules of logic. God created the Universe. Therefore, God is not bound by the rules of logic. You also asked why the cause of the Universe must exist outside of the Universe: If the cause of the Universe didn't exist outside of the Universe, the Universe would exist before it was created, which is impossible. Therefore, the cause must exist outside of the Universe. I said, "Something is either personal or it isn't: There is no middle ground. Since the cause of the Universe logically cannot be impersonal, the cause must logically be personal.", and you said, "This does not prove God"s existence at all. I even said in the beginning that God was a personal being.". I was explanation why the eternal, unchangeable, immaterial, omnipotent cause of the Universe must be a personal being. God is defined as an eternal, unchangeble, immaterial, omnipotent cause of the Universe, and the cause of the Universe must have those attributes, therefore, God exists. Argument 2 1) The Church is not the Bible. 2) If I put what all the links said in text, it would go past the word limit: So links were needed. They are the exact same arguments either way. Your Re-New Argument I can simply qoute myself to answer it: The Universe is bound by time. God created the Universe. Therefore, God is not bound by time (Thus meaning he lives outside of it). Since God is not bound by time, and is omnipresent, he is everywhere, at every time period, all the time. This means, that to say, "this means that the being has no potential to avoid its choices", is inaccurate, because it doesn't fit within the nature of God, thus meaning that it cannot be used as a valid argument against the existence of God. Your New Argument "You may object that God, being omnipotent, can change his mind. But if he does, then he did not know the future in the first place. If he truly knows the future, then the future is fixed and not even God can change it. If he changes his mind anyway, then his knowledge was limited. You can't have it both ways: no being can be omniscient and omnipotent at the same time. Therefore God cannot exist." 2 solutions to this one: 1) This was already answered. The Universe is bound by time. God created the Universe. Therefore, God is not bound by time (Thus meaning he lives outside of it). Since God is not bound by time, and is omnipresent, he is everywhere, at every time period, all the time. This means, that to say, "then he did not know the future in the first place. If he truly knows the future, then the future is fixed and not even God can change it", is inaccurate, because it doesn't fit within the nature of God, thus meaning that it cannot be used as a valid argument against the existence of God. 2) You are down playing omnipotence. I could also object that God, being omnipotent, can change his mind and not change his mind at the same time. An omnipotent being can do ANYTHING. These things are included in ANYTHING: Being a married bachelor, and a Theist Atheist. These things are not impossible to do for a being that can do ANYTHING. Therefore, omnipotence is possible. Therefore, an omnipotent being can exist. Conclusion: Con cannot read my mind, and thus cannot determine if I purposely cheated. I believe liars go to the lake of fire, therefore I have no reason to lie about whether I purposefully cheated or not. There is no unfair advantage, because the arguments wil sink or float by themselves anyway. If Con cannot refute my points properly, he will lose.