This years policy topic

Dropping spec Kritik 1- Overview, line by line, overview The affirmative massively undercovers the kritik, he does not even understand the concept. The point is that his mindset when writing this affirmative was flawed therefore he cannot solve. We must change our mindset before we can solve any environmental problem. 1. Any plan that does not make the environment a subject. Unless we are co-operating with the environment and not mentally putting ourselves above the environment we can never begin to understand it. You can legalize hemp. You can pursue the cultivation of switchgrass, you can use solar power, wind power, tidal power. All of these things work along with the environment and if you were to run one of these affirmatives it would be evident that you are in tune with nature, understanding it, not stealing from it, but co-operating with the environment that is equal to us. 2. My alternative is specifically, " to reject the aff and pursue policy options that do not subjectivize the environment and rely on intrinsically motivated change". I laid out affs that you can run that dont make the environment a subject, but co-operate with it. The judges should mold their mindsets to only accept policy options that are presented by a person in tune with nature, and is evident in their plan text because they co-operate with mother earth 3. The harm is obvious. You are perpetuating the mindset that its ok to think we are better than the environment. This is where the conceded industrial revolution example will come in to play. This mindset turns back the case because there is no way you are ever going to solve for environmental issues. Not only does it turn back the case, it ensures extinction through global warming because you havent molded your mindset, which is critical to solve for global warming. Cross apply his extinction impact from the 1AC 4. They dont solve. This is where understanding of debate and critiques is critical for a two way debate, if he understood what was going on I am very sure this would be a much better debate. The critiques turns his solvency in the long term, and says he cannot solve unless he changes his mindset. What is really going to screw over the affirmative is that he does not even mention intrinsically motivated change in the entirety of his speech. He concededs 100 percent that intrinsically motivated change solves the case and solves better. The alternative there alone solves the case because he conceded that it does. He has dropped the argument, dont let him bring it up again because thats horribly abusive to my side of the debate. Overview- The Affirmative has no idea what is going on. I have attacked his mindset at its base and it is evident that his mindset is what I say it is because even he says "wtf can i run then?". He cannot see that co-operation with good ol mother earth is possible and ties himself only to policies that make him feel superior to the environment. For this reason alone you have to vote for the negative team. Embrace my alternative of intrinsically motivated change that does not subjectivize the environment to promote a lasting change to America. He concedes that intrinsic motivation will solve the case 100 percent, and then some. Look to my alternative to actually solve what the affirmative wants to do. You may be for nuclear energy, and that is all fine and dandy, but at the point in which the affirmative debater does not answer the K at all, you have to immediately look to the negative. Second K- Overview, line by line, Overview This again is a fundamental issue, when we convert to the 13 moon peace calender it symbolizes our connection with the environment. The gregorian calender has nothing to do with the environment, and if we were to switch over to the other consideration for the environment will be woven throughout our everyday lives. 1. No uniqueness? No sh*t. We are on the Gregorian calender and our environment is being horribly destroyed. This is not a disad that you can just say "mehh its happening now". Because it is happening now proves why it needs to be changed. 2. Yes there is. Best K ever! 3. We can convert, if we truly want to solve our environmental problems. This will be the ultimate test of our dedication to saving the environment, if we can change even our calender system to help mother earth, we can do anything. I am also winning this K. I really hope some REAL policy kids are out there that know how to judge tab.. PLEASE GOD PLEASE Disad 1 I will concede Australia exports to China mostly. Theres no existing turns. Just drop the DA as if it doesnt exist. 1. He concedes link to the case by saying it links to all cases. So what I am lazy and found a killer disad to take out every team out there? 2. My evidence indicates that our society has become so obsessed with saving lives (ie cancer research, malaria nets in ssa, giving asian people rice [hehe togamisan]) that we forget there is not an infinite amount of room on earth and eventually we will run out. Nature will not work itself out because we have become too good at saving lives, which is bad! 3. You dont break the link. I have proven that nature wont work itself out. This ties into the K, our mindset that we OWN the environment stops this from happening. We think we can control whatever goes on in the world, including people dying so this throws off the natural balance and insures overpopulation. The only way to solve this is to adopt the framework of the negative. 4. I have TURNED his answer to the disad Disad 3- I will concede he farted too. Pig. Case- Yes sir. (attacking from a different perspective/world). If we let nuclear war happen, the world is going to start over. We need to start over and live like primitive man did because our cavemen ancestors knew what was up with the environment. I mean havent you ever seen The Flinstones? They had cars too. With ZERO emissions. We need to be like the Flinstones, and restart our society from its base. So if you dont want to vote on the K, or the disad, you have to vote here because I have proven nuclear war and extinction is good! And a prayer Our Father, who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, On earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, As we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, But deliver us from evil. [For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever and ever. Amen.]