Remove Barack Obama from white house yes or no & explain your reasons

Thanks, Steven, for allowing me to accept the challenge. Although you didn't personally let me, you did make an interesting one and arguably my first political debate. Good luck, mate. I hope to have a fun discussion on this.==========OpeningTo start off, I do not think President Obama should be removed from office on a very simple basis. He has yet to have done anything wrong to legally remove him from office. I, for one as a Liberal, have disagreed with Obama on a many number of things -contrary to the Republican and Fox News' belief we all worship him-, yet I am content that he does not warrant removal on his actions, or at least that which has been listen by my opponent. Since I have no long opening, where as Pro has his for reasons to have impeachment, I will simply address a few of his points -or rather common beliefs that he may or may not share in his post to counter the reasons for his impeachment being warranted.P1The first point I wish to make is the immigration reform, or rather the Amnesty granted by President Barrack Obama. First off, for anyone who is to complain it is illegal, I point, and most off all every Conservative who worships Jesus Reagan, to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Aside from saying that companies should not hire immigrants they knowingly are illegal, it directly made many illegal immigrants legal citizens. All he asked was that they know a few basic things, such as: candidates were required to prove that they were not guilty of crimes, that they were in the country before January 1, 1982, and that they possessed minimal knowledge about U.S. history, government, and the English language. It legalized illegal immigrants who entered the United States before January 1, 1982 and had resided there continuously with the penalty of a fine, back taxes due, and admission of guilt. This is coming from the guy the Right worships and also declares Obama to be un-American. Obama did the same thing, in a few parts. The most similar aspect is that Obama's Amnesty required them to have been here for X amount of years ( believe it to be 10 years, but I am not 100% on that) in order for it to allow you to be legal officially. His amnesty was perfectly legal by all means of Presidential power, and the same exercised by former President, Ronald Reagen. [1]To claim they are mostly murders, rapist, and so on, like Trump thought he should say, there is no evidence supporting that and it would be silly for anyone to target the Amnesty plan being bad on the basis a few bad guys might appear. That is simply a chance that is going to happen regardless. An, as the Right like to argue with guns, criminals do not follow the law anyways, thus them getting Amnesty or nor would not matter. The plan does not allow people to come to America, you had to have been here for X amount of time and met a certain requirement set down. It wasn't an open arm thing. It was like his College plan, where you needed to have a certain GPA to remain in. We should add that George H.W. Bush did the same that affected 40% of undocumented aliens, where as Obama's was simply 45%. not much of a chance. [2] "Up to 3.7 million undocumented parents of U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents in the country for at least five years, are eligible for the new deferrals, as are about .3 million immigrants who arrived as children before January, 2010. (The second group are eligible by expansion of the existing Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. DACA previously covered 1.2 million people; the expansion brings it to 1.5 million)." [3]P2For two other points, the Nuclear Deal with Iran was not bad and I will address that in my next post. I will say now, the Supreme Courts decision was legal and followed via the same case of Loving v. Virgina. Marriage is a federal issue and is indeed involved in federal aspects. Just like when a private school, or private building/company, organization, takes any money from the federal government, it officially is 'public' in the sense is must follow federal guidelines.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Cited Work~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1) https://en.wikipedia.org...2) https://en.wikipedia.org...3) New York Times, "What Is President Obama’s Immigration Plan?" (November 20, 2014, retrieved 2014-11-21) http://www.nytimes.com...