Intermediate's Debate Competition R1: US Gov should implement solar road highways within the US

First I'll start off with my case then go on to my opponent's.Contention 1. Environment Via the debate topic we can assume that the US federal government will be making solar roads, but you might just ask yourself "What are these solar panels made from?" Well I have the answer, Jelly Fish proteins. The reason for this is that Jelly fish proteins are the cheapest and easiest to use when making solar panels since they absorb light. (http://www.energymatters.com.au... and http://www.popsci.com...) These are also known as solar cells and it has been proved that solar highways use these solar cells and according to one of the Co-inventor of solar road ways, Scott Brusaw, he has stated that these highways will need 3 layers of the solar celled panels. (http://www.treehugger.com...) Now you must be asking yourself why is this important? Well it is on the matter of fact that the over fishing of jelly fish will lead to the collapse of the fishing industry and not just in the US, but in Japan as well. Due to already over fishing the jellyfish population has increased 6 fold since the year 2002! (http://www.cbc.ca...) This has resulted in the loss of jobs, industry revenue loss, decline in fish prices (which is what can kill the fishing industry), and putting beach goers and fishermen lives in danger. (http://www.globalrp.org...) So you can see here that not only does it hurt the environment, but it comes around to hurting the economy and the average Joe.Also to remove existing roads it will be deadly to the atmosphere! Solar panels use NF3 which warms the atmosphere 17000 more times than CO2! (http://www.ehow.com...) So may I ask what environment positive affects does this actually have?! They are also ineffeciate at collecting energy which they only collect 14% of what they receive (http://science.howstuffworks.com...)Contention 2. Economy(this is adding to what has been added from the last contention) According to Investors Business Daily they have reported, "Three years ago, when Obama's Department of Energy started approving roughly $16 billion in federal loan guarantees for solar energy companies, the DOE agreed to put taxpayers' money behind startups that were working on ways to make solar panels cheaper. Two, Solyndra and Abound, have now gone belly-up." (http://news.investors.com...) We can already see that the federal government has tried their hands at solar roads and green energy, but they have failed!Here is another bomb shell. Brusaw, the co-inventor of solar roads, have stated that it would cost $5,000 per square foot of road and that there it might fail. ( http://www.treehugger.com...) When the founder states that it might fail and it's going to be costly then it seems like a waste of money and a major strain on the economy that is just now getting out of a recession and starting to recover.Investors have already estimated face loss of billions if this plan goes into effect (http://www.ecofriend.com...) No onto my opponent's arguments (except for the two arguments that I've already attack in my contentions)Contention 3. Safety My opponent brings up that they are safe, but lets think about one things everyone hates, pot holes! According to Discovery current solar panels are not durable and creating ones that are would sky rocket their prices and the up keep would send profits into the tubes! (http://curiosity.discovery.com...)Another thing that my opponent has failed to factor in is glare! Yes, glare. We have solar panels so with the light shinning on the panels we will see that the number of accidents will increase due to glare. (http://www.1800lawline.com...)