Islam Is The True Religion

Propositions (1) Under the Refutation of Opponent's Fallacies1. (On Logical Fallacies) It is completely neccesary for everyone to acknowledge the many fallacies that the opposition has made, and then we shall see the many illogical reasonings behind the opponent's conclusion.1.1 Anecdoctal Evidences has been used by the opposition; anecdotal evidence is namely cherry-picked evidence, but can also include personal experiences to come to conclusion. In a premise-conclusive deductive logical syllogism, it comes to mainly this:P1. I believe in IslamP2. Whatever I believe is TrueC. Henceforth Islam is the true religionThis is faulty reasoning; it provides no scientific, physical, philosophical or even religious evidence that seem to conclude that this is so. Anecdoctal evidence is pseudo-scientific, logically fallacious, and easily refuted; henceforth, I urge the opposition to check his premises, as this is a debate, not a sermont.1.2 Circular Logic has also been used; Islam is the "true religion" because of "evidences presented in the Quran" How is this even logical? For if I said that Solipism was true, and used evidences from Solipist texts alone, I would not be presenting any arguments. Note that this debate is based upon the truth-factor of "Islam" and for Islam to be the true religion, everything it says has to be true. Again, I urge the opponent to check his premises.1.3 Strawman has been used heavily; the opponent has replied to my usage of several Quran quotes, but not to how I interpret them and show that they are fallacious. 1.4 Ignoratio Elenchi has been committed throughout this debate. Ergo the opponent needs to check his premises. I shall reply to the points that I find relevant to this debate only.Propositions (2) Under the Refutation of Opponent's Reply to Proposition 2.12.1 It is completely abnormal to say that the opponent has used science to prove that Islam is the true religion; he has said none of such things. In fact, he has not proven anything in his genome analogy; the human genome cannot be described with terms used to describe human consciousness, such as "enlightenment" whatsoever. That would be like ascribing adjectives commonly used for inanimated objects; or more so, would one commonly call a rock sexy?2.2 Apart from this, one cannot say that there is no "good quality in a religion" That is like saying LaVeyan Satanism is good, because there is no "bad". Or similarly, that is like saying that alturism is bad because there is "no good" There is good, and good comes with good qualities; for whatever is moral must be the result of only moral qualities. For how can moral men develop from immoral ones?2.3 Similarly, how can one adjectified predicate be proven, when the qualities of that predicate is denied? That is similar to claiming that I am a man, but there is no qualities to define the gender differences. The qualities of the true religion accordingly to the definitions, must be wholly true, not partially.2.4 Henceforth, the opponent has denied the debate motion; the qualities of a true religion make a religion true, but if these qualities do not exist, then there is no true religion.∴ The opponent concedes as he refuses to answer the question of the qualities of a true religionPropositions (3) Under the Reply of the Objection of the Scientific Fallacies in R13.1 (Fallacies on Generation of Humans) On the Quran Verse regarding the generation of life; as established, this proposition outlines the fallacies that the Quran commits when talking about human generation. As stated before, if the Quran has fallacies in it, especially scientific, then Islam is not the true religion because a true religion is wholly true. 3.21 Ironically, opposition commits the "undistributed minor premise" fallacy; this is due to the fact that there is no second premise. His arguments in pure syllogistical form is:P1. The Quran was written by people who represented AllahC. Every word in the Quran is the word of AllahWe cannot come to conclusions this easily. Firstly, the Quran was written by mortals; men like you and me. Secondly, the opponent states that we cannot question the Quran; "it is true because it just is" is not acceptable by any person with a sense of reasoning. 3.22 The opponent talks about Allah being metaphorical; well, it is clear that I did not interpret these verses literally. 3.3 On the Grass and Carpet Verse; perhaps the opponent needs clarification. It is indeed of my greatest interest to say this: a carpet is flat. So if Allah describes the earth as a carpet, then Allah describes the earth as flat. However, the earth is clearly not flat, because circumnavigation via boat and ships is possible.3.31 The opponent makes an argument for a reinterpretation of this verse. Let us first recite the verse in full, accordingly with the Sahih International:"[It is He] who has made for you the earth as a bed [spread out] and inserted therein for you roadways and sent down from the sky, rain and produced thereby categories of various plants." It takes no genius to find out that it is indeed an affirmative to completely affirm that this Quran verse always meant that the "earth was made flat by Allah" Propositions (4) Under the Scientific Evidences and Truth Value4. It is clear that the true religion does not teach man to be good; that is a virtue of a good religion. Henceforth, this conclusion is ignoratio elenchi due to the fact that we are not talking about Islam as a positive force, but as a true religion.4.1 If Islam were a true religion, as stated due to the definition, Islam must be wholly true.4.2 Henceforth, it is suffice for me to point out one mistake in the Quran, or in Islam in general, to win this debate. Nevertheless4.3 the Quran's facts on the nature of the Universe is based purely on Theological Cosmology; there is no truth factor, or even conclusive scientific proof, of Seven Heavens existing.4.4 Quran Verses 23:12-14 also incorrectly portrays life in a fetus; accordingly, the flesh fully develops first and it is only because of the flesh that bones are produced, as apart from the verses which state that the fetus is develops when first with the creation of a flesh and bones separately from each other. [1]4.5 As stated, the Quran gives us an improper and falsifiable description of the creation of rain, as it is earthly proccesses that create rain, not supernatural ones.∴ Scientific Evidences in the Quran contain some inaccuracies, which make the Quran falseDue to time restrictions, I have to end my arguments here. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org...