In the end, Jesus Christ will save all of mankind.

My adversary seems to think he has refuted my arguments when in fact he has refuted nothing, but halfway offered a concession.C1) Glory and a eternal hellLet me lay this out in a syllogism (P1) For God to save all of mankind hell cannot be eternal(P2) Hell is eternal(C) Since hell is eternal God, cannot save all of mankind. Hell's primary purpose is to serve as a punishment for those that reject Christ. God would willingly and has willingly let us walk into hell, he made us for that purpose. I'm not sure what bible my adversary is reading, but God sending people to an eternal hell is a key point in almost every translation and its found even within the dead sea scrolls. He also asserts that it does not diminish God's glory which is false in and of itself, as God would be forcing you to be saved in order to save all of mankind. Literally he is assuming one of two things. A either God will force everyone to be saved, or B everyone will accept God (if hell is not eternal) prima facie. Both of which are not supported by scripture. The scripture says he has "come to save all" not that he will save all. There are two ways to look at thisYou have the Calvinistic perspective which to me is the most viableThis is where you acknowledge that only certain people will go into hell, and certain ones will go into heave. This is defended by the context and linguistics revolving around the world "all" in the bible. As most linguistics, the version of all that is presented is referring to a group of people and not the over all majorityThen you have the traditional view point, where everyone has free will and can chose either way. Everyone will not heaven, this is abundantly obvious as people in the bible were sentenced to hell themselves. So for my adversary contention and case to be true, he would have to show that how hell is not eternal because people are already in hell . If god would by extension force everyone to be saved, or save everyone even if they rejected him this diminishes his glory. As anyone could act anyway and end up in heaven. The glory of God is that he saves those that choose to follow him, that is a Christians reward, and by denying that to them and saying you can act anyway and end up in heaven you are undermining the core principle of the bible. A) free will in CalvinismMy adversary lacks a fundamental understanding of a Calvinistic argument. We have the free will to do whatever we want, chose God , not chose God, brush my teeth etc. This does not mean that the act was already pre determined by God. I have free will in the sense I can chose what to do, but its not free in the sense that it is pre determined. C2) Designed for hellRomans 8 28 - 30 "And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified."God himself knows everything, and he knew the choices he would make when he created us. So yes we were designed knowing that we would reject God. This verse in itself shows that he knew that some people would conform to the image of his son (Christians) and that others would reject him (sinners). If there is a God my adversary is applying his concept of what is just to a higher beingIsiah 55 : 8-9 " For My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways My ways,’ says the Lord. ‘For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts"ConclusionMy adversary has not refuted anything nor has he upheld his Burden. For him to even begin his burden he must show that hell is not eternal. Until then he has not even presented an argument.