Evolution is a superior explanation for the origin of man and the universe as compared to creationis

The source is unreliable: Every argument you have made up till now is based on the bible, your claims which you refer to as unexplainable have been explained, yet there is one theory for creation and that is God created it all. It has no evidence for this besides explainable questions. 1. The universe coming into existence = Big bang caused by collapsing of a black hole. 2. Life happened too fast for evolution = Life developed over time from the moment the earth cooled enough to allow life to exist. 3. Divine Experiences = Mind tricks and moments that give the people a sense of "divine", later dissipating and returning back to previous state, It"s like adrenaline. 4. The Idea of God = Developed from the objects known as the sun and moon by ancient humans looking for the answer first called "deity/ies". 5. Divine Consensus = tradition of explanation from number 4. 6. Truth is absolute = truth is subject to perception, from two sources who relay their truth we discern the closes explanation to be the truth. 7. The dimension is too vast = if you really think vast/size equals intelligence then there"s no hope for you. Every problem you presented I have given you a rational answer supported by theories, unlike the answer of "god" which is unexplainable by itself besides stating "He"s Eternal", how is he? Your claim against infinite regression is literally the same as eternal god. For he existed, before he existed and before that he existed, it continues on for eternity. Eternal Regression is what it is for the argument of god. At least science will provide theories on why infinite regression happens and how it occurs. Though the biggest issue is when one points at this problem that god is unexplainable, you read from the bible, you do know that book is plagiarized correct? . http://religiondispatches.org... . http://goo.gl... The world written in that book are not 100% from the original writer, why would god speaking to this writer or god himself need to take stories some several thousand years older than time it takes place. You know a book that is similar to how the bible is written would be the Tales of King Author. Which everyone knows is not a real character, but based on two individuals who were alive at the time. . http://www.caerleon.net... "According to Wikipedia there are around 4,200 different religions. That is what I mean by divine consensus. Not being high, intoxicated through drugs or social conduct, but inner and deeper knowledge arising from a common unknown divine essence. God. I believe you are unable to account for this fact in the world we live in today. " You mentioned that there are 4200 other religions, well" . http://churchofsatan.com... . http://goo.gl... Stating there are 4200 religions that believe in god therefor god exist without at least looking at all religions to see if their belief resides in god is really sad. You have failed to bring one "evidence" that I can"t explain with science. Though you have attempted this, seems they have failed, so we will go to your evidence of black holes nonexistence. Trying to disprove my explanation for your first "evidence" provided. . http://goo.gl... . http://arxiv.org... Why does this not work? For we have seen them, reason why the theory of relativity is so compelling. "Astronomers have found convincing evidence for a supermassive black hole in the center of our own Milky Way galaxy, the galaxy NGC 4258, the giant elliptical galaxy M87, and several others. Scientists verified the existence of the black holes by studying the speed of the clouds of gas orbiting those regions. In 1994, Hubble Space Telescope data measured the mass of an unseen object at the center of M87. Based on the motion of the material whirling about the center, the object is estimated to be about 3 billion times the mass of our Sun and appears to be concentrated into a space smaller than our solar system. " . http://goo.gl... I"ll continue down the list of "evidences" you presented and show how irrational or how they have no backing. 2nd evidence, Life happened too fast for evolution, I have read and reread this claim and found no evidence that could restrict the development of life or support the claim life developed "too fast". Life simply develops at its pace, there is no strict time frame needed for life to develop. . http://goo.gl... 3rd evidence, Divine Experiences, Explainable by how the brain interacts with the world, just like adrenaline can dull pain, increase reaction times, increase strength, yet no one would claim it"s not the brain its god giving a blessing, well actually there would be but modern science in the medical field quickly debunks such a claim. 4th evidence, The Idea of God, Do you really think "god" was originally thought up in the way he"s presented now? There"s been countless gods from the past so how can you assume this god out of the other 3599 is the real one. God is a concept created to explain from ancient rational thought, If this ball gives me light warmth and keeps the predators away it must be divine, if this ball takes away said heat and light and brings predators closer it must be divine. It"s a primitive way of thinking that developed to explain, now we have more rational explanations that don"t require hundreds of gods and it works, so trying to say "No this one is real" is truly irrational for every single other one was found not to be. . http://godisimaginary.com... 5th evidence, Divine Consensus, In through this is a tradition built upon the idea of god, and it indoctrinates kids before they can fallow rational thought and come up with their own belief, allowing the cycle to continue, also the fact the out of the 4200 religions not every single one believes in a creator shows how despite the argument is. "There has to be a god for look at all the religions", sorry but if there were 3599 other gods, I"m sure having 4200 religions kind of proves the unlikelihood of god. 6th evidence, Truth is absolute, No one can discern absolute truth, for truth is based on two accounts which are peered reviewed to come up with the closest explanation of truth. It"s all about perception and if one perception exists then it would be labeled as truth. 7th evidence, Too vast, and 2 + ? = 4, obviously, ? = god, no way it can be anything else, your mistaking something we don"t know yet as evidence of god. We don"t even know if are definition of "vast" even holds up on a universe scale, for it"s, again, all about perception, we could be a size of a penny compared to others. Yet you claim this is the answer? Creation cannot stand without the bible: If you wish to propose a theory of a being creating it all then, it must be tested and peer reviewed. Though the only source of this god is the bible, if we use other sources of god we find the god and the characteristics of god varies too widely and don"t support each other. Just like a debate one should present several articles too support one"s side, one would never run in with one and only one article. You have only provided words and explanations from one source and attempted to debunk with technical time or non-peer reviewed theories. Evidence beyond the bible is nonexistent for proof of god, while evolution and science provides extremely large amount of evidence that support it. Creationist rely on the "lack of evidence does not mean there is none", but would you take someone seriously with they kept posting the exact argument and over and over in response to multiple sources? Irrational belief in god; why the argument for god does not work in this reality. . http://goo.gl... Recap: I fear you have some misconceptions on the origins of your own religion, I have dug and re-dug into the topic and found this god is no different from the others, for he was conceived to unite humanity in a dark time, using a supreme being who will punish you if you don"t fallow, sounds like a parent who likes using a belt. It was good for the time, but it"s a rewrite of other myths and history. I have provided and countered every argument made so far, and could keep countering for there has not been one thing science and evolution cannot come up with an explanation. If religion had its way, we would have stopped at the earth is flat, we are the center of the universe, you will be punished if you go against god, if your raped you need to either marry or pay the husband 50 gold, etc" So far, the only source given by my opponent is, bible, and quick google search article. Conclusion: God and the bible are a great story, it gave an answer when people were looking for one, now we as humans have found another way to explain this reality without using god(s), god is getting larger in definition God is the sun and rules over earth>God rules the sky>God rules the heavens> god rules the galaxy> god Rules the Universe> what will happen is when we finally find what created this universe those who believe still, if there is a religion left by then, it the claim "God created it all", regression much and people complain about infinite regression, isn"t the same thing happening with the definition of god? IF you"re willing to believe in god, but unwilling to believe in any of the other 3599 gods, who is it to say the other 3599 gods are untrue? IF you"re willing to believe in god but no other life, then how can you say there is no other life? For not only does the evidence suggest the bible is just a story, previous writings and myth also show that the story is not original at all, in fact is fairly common. I thank TheJunioVarsityNovice for such a fun topic, was able to dive in again into a topic a have placed on the back burner from the vast about on information provided.