Baby-killers (AKA "Abortionists") Deserve the Death Penalty

DEATH PENALTY FOR BABY-KILLERS: Why do individuals that kill babies in their mothers' wombs deserve the death penalty? There are many factors involved in all violent crimes, and a fewR03; of the most important are: -- the vulnerability of the victim -- the age of the victim -- the innocence of the victim, and -- the degree of violence In most cases, the more vulnerable the victim of a violent crime, the harsher the sentence. For example, physically assaulting someone who is ill, weak, or otherwise extra vulnerable consistently draws a harsher sentence in court than physically assaulting someone who is healthy, strong, and reasonably able to defend himself. Similarly, in most cases of violent crime, the younger the victim is, the harsher a sentence the crime draws. For example, it is a much more serious crime to rape a minor than to rape an adult, and even more serious to rape a baby than to rape a minor. In cases of simple assault, it is considered more serious to assault a minor than to assault an adult, and also considered more serious to assault a baby than to assault a minor. In all these cases, the harshness of the sentence is consistently greater, the younger the victim is. The innocence of the victim is also taken into consideration in courts of law. For example, if someone attacks you, and then you hit back in self-defense, then you will probably be excused, but if you hit someone who is innocent, for no reason, then you'll most likely be convicted of assault and punished. Of course, the degree of violence is also an important factor. For example, killing is considered a heavier offense than either rape or simple assault. All of these factors also have significant bearing on the issue of baby-killing: The most vulnerable time in human life is the time we spend in our mothers' wombs. Being very dependent and physically weak at that time makes us extremely vulnerable and completely defenseless against attacks. Also, there is no victim of any crime younger then a baby in the womb, and as noted above, the youth of the victim consistently draws harsher sentences in courts of law. Of course, there is no victim more innocent than a baby killed in the womb: These are human beings who have done practically nothing at all in their entire lives: Babies in the womb are the very epitome of innocence. In addition to all of that, the killing of human beings is generally agreed in courts of law to be the most serious category of all violent crimes. In fact, killing healthy adults who are reasonably capable of self-defense often draws the death penalty. Not always, but death has been given as a sentence in many such murder cases. Comparatively speaking, the killing of babies in their mothers' wombs should be considered much, much more serious than the killing of adults. Taking all of these important factors into consideration, it is easy to understand the fact that killing babies in the womb should be considered the most serious of all violent crimes. Therefore the killing of babies in their mothers' wombs should definitely draw the harshest sentence, because of the extreme vulnerability of the victim, the extreme youth of the victim, the extreme innocence of the victim, and the extreme seriousness of the crime (which is the taking of human life). This is why baby-killers should receive the death penalty.