God does not exist

My opponent technically should have the full burden of proof in this debate because of the inferring of a positive (is, does, are, was, will ect.), but he refused to start the debate himself. I am taking the liberty of kicking off this hopefully, intellectually enlightening exchange.I personally agree that the base assumption is X doesn't exist, until reasoning or evidence appears however there are still a few Atheistic arguments against the existence of God which I personally designs myself which I feel hold weight against the existence of a sentient creator of the cosmos who still exists.Argument #1 in favor of God's non-existence: This argument is important because a line must be drawn in order to avoid any special pleading. There are many cases where theists will claim that whatever exists "outside" of the universe must poses opposite qualities (Timelessness, spacelessness, non-physical) but neglect that it also applies to causes too.I could just say whatever exists outside the universe is non-casual because causes exist inside the universe, like the theist claims a hypothetical "outside" the universe must be non-physical, because inside the universe is physical.Now lets assume the opposite for the sake of discussion, and that it is logical to use inside of the universe as a guideline for what may be "outside", it may be logical to assume there was a cause of the universe, but it still doesn't look for a sentient being. My first argument is as follows: Prelude: There are only two options: Either it is sensical to use logic based on observation within the universe in an attempt to describe propertiesof a hypothetical “outside” the universe, or it is nonsensical. Argument: If it is sensical to use logic based on observation within the universe in an attempt to describe properties of a hypothetical “outside” the universe: Based on all available knowledge P1: If the universe was caused, it logically would be the most powerful, most complex, and probable cause. P2: Non-sentient causes are more powerful and complex than sentient causes, and outnumber sentient causes by an extremely large margin. (there is more cause and effect going on in the universe in larger power that is non-sentient, than sentient causes here on earth).P3: When faced with the two options of a hypothetical non-sentient cause and a sentient cause of the universe,a non-sentient cause is most likely true because it is more probable, and involves more power and complexity. If it is nonsensical to use logic based on observation within the universe in an attempt to describe properties of a hypothetical “outside” the universe: P1: Causes occur within the universe P2: It is nonsensical to believe a cause can exist outside the universe, because they occur within the universe P3: The universe was uncaused Conclusion: The universe, had no sentient cause.Argument #2 in favor of God's non-existence: In this argument I will argue that the universe's beginning had an internal cause rather than external, and that assuming the internal cause is God (strictly for the sake of argument) is most likely non-existent by now if it was an internal cause.ArgumentP1: If the cause of the universe was necessary, it was internal, and if that cause is God, then God cannot exist as a timeless or spaceless being. P2: If God is not timeless or spaceless, he is finite.P3: Evidence within the universe tells us, that finite beings cannot live 13.7 billion years.P4: The cause of the universe was internal. P5: God does not exist today.What evidence to do I have to back up my claim that the beginning of the universe had an internal cause if it needed one? Well we know the universe is expanding, not from being pulled out from the outside but from being pushed from the inside by dark energy. Since the beginning of the universe is described as the expansion from the singularity, and modern cosmology is telling us that the inflation is coming from the inside the universe, then if the universe requires a cause, it was most likely an internal one. Here is an additional argument showing that if a cause is required for the expansion of the singularity, it was a virtual particle and not a sentient being.Conclusion:God does not exist today.Argument #2 in favor of God's non-existence: I'm going to argue that if the cause of the expansion of the singularity is required, it was not due to an internal sentient being, but an internal Quantum Fluctuation. P1: If the expansion from the singularity required a cause, it requires an internal cause (which I already provided reasoning for)P2: The internal cause was due to Quantum FluctuationsP3: Quantum Fluctuations are non-sentientP5: A sentient cause of the expansion of the singularity, did not, and does not exist.Why must the expansion of the universe be due to Quantum Fluctuations? Well..."According to the model of inflation the ones (Quantum Fluctuations) that existed when inflation began were amplified and formed the seed of all current observed structure." - Wikipedia [1]Therefore, Quantum Fluctuations were responsible for the expansion and inflation of the known universe, and were the seeds of galaxy formations, and even sentient life on earth.Conclusion:A sentient cause of the expansion of the singularity, did not, and does not exist. First Round (technically second round) exit comment:I believe I have fulfilled my burden and presented solid arguments in favor of God's non-existence. Source(s): [1] http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.youtube.com...