BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Many gays are playing some gay friendly heteros for fools by turning some gay, deceiving them, ect.

In conclusion, Con's entire argument is filled with mostly straw man fallacies and irrelevant claims. Here is an example "What I was trying to say was that anyone who says that homosexuality does not fit in with nature is wrong" I didn't even mention anything about "nature". This is irrelevant to my argument. Also, mental disorders, cannibalism, pedophilia, and incest have all been observed among non-human species. Also, humans and other species don't share the exact same species biological anatomy, brain and emotions. Therefore, what applies to non-human species may not apply to humans. Con failed to successfully dispute my argument. I proved that heterosexuals can be turned gay. The largest, Most reliable study on gays clearly Shows Experimentation, Gay pornography, Sexual abuse, Childhood Gender NONCONFORMITY Are Some Of The Reasons Why People Have Gone gay. Therefore, If a gay is able to convince his non-homophobic close friend to watch gay porn and experience homosexuality, that heterosexual could turn gay but it all depends on the heterosexual. The study shows unique reactions to environmental factors makes people gay. Neither Genes nor Choice: Same-Sex Attraction Is Mostly a Unique Reaction to Environmental Factors [Journal of Human Sexuality 3:81-114 (2011)] by Neil E. Whitehead8 I also showed that gays COMMONLY develop crushes on their straight friends according to the gay teen expert Ellen Friedrich Google '5 types of straight crushes". Ellen Friedrich even admitted that some straight crushes turn into relationships on #5 Yes, STRAIGHT crushes meaning the person they had had a crush on was straight but was turned gay. Many gays deceive their heterosexual friends by hiding their crush on them. They get close in the name of friendship for the sake of sexually seducing them. Source 5 types of straight crushes"
Many gays are playing some gay friendly heteros for fools by turning some gay, deceiving them, ect.

"Many species also practice cannibalism, pedophilia and incest. Using your logic, we should embrace incest, pedophilia and cannibalism among humans because animals do it." My point wasn't that we should embrace homosexuality because animals do it. What I was trying to say was that anyone who says that homosexuality does not fit in with nature is wrong, because if you take a good look around us, it also happens with other species. Now, on to your point about pedophila, caniballism, etc. Humans shouldn't embrace this stuff. Why? Because it harms others. Homosexuality, on the other hand, does not. And I know that at this point you're gonna go on a rant about how being gay can give you AIDS, but before you do that, read my last point. "According to TDC, gays are 44 times more likely to contract hiv, 46 times more likely to contact syphills, 17 times more likely to develop analysts cancer. Gays also have higher rates of bacterial vaginosis, cancer, drug resistant gonerehea, hvp" Condoms exist for a reason.
Many gays are playing some gay friendly heteros for fools by turning some gay, deceiving them, ect.

"Humans aren't the only species that has same-sex pairings" This is about the dumbest claim that gays constantly state. You think you're being smart but youre really being dumb as hell 1. Many species also practice cannibalism, pedophilia and incest. Using your logic, we should embrace incest, pedophilia and cannibalism among humans because animals do it. 2. The human anatomy SPECIFICALLY does not sit well with homosexual behavior. UNLIKE homosexual non-human species, homosexual humans are far more likely to trigger deadly std epidemics, spread deadly STDS and have much higher rates of deadly stds. "Having a crush on straight friends is not the same as turning a person gay" This is a straw man fallacy. I never claimed what you are arguing against. My point is, when a gay befriends a heterosexual without telling the heterosexual that the gay has a crush on the heterosexual, the gay can set the heterosexual up for sexual seduction without the heterosexual knowing. The largest most reliable study on homosexuality shows experimentation, gay pornography and sexual abuse can literally turn some people gay especially if they are not homophobic. Therefore, simply putting on a gay pornography and convincing the heterosexual or even paying the heterosexual to experience homosexuality, it could possibly turn the heterosexual gay. Neither Genes nor Choice: Same-Sex Attraction Is Mostly a Unique Reaction to Environmental Factors [Journal of Human Sexuality 3:81-114 (2011)] by Neil E. Whitehead8 "but vice versa is foolishness and evil" According TO CDC, gays are 44 times more likely to contract hiv, 46 times more likely to contract syphilis, 17 times more likely to develop anak cancer. Gays also have higher rates of bacterial vaginosis, cancer, drug resistant gonorrhea, hpv. Therefore, turning a person to a high health risk lifestyle could be considered evil and foolish
Many gays are playing some gay friendly heteros for fools by turning some gay, deceiving them, ect.

I would like to start off by saying that I am a heterosexual who supports gay rights. My first point, is that homosexuality is not a choice, and science has proven this. Humans aren't the only species that has same-sex pairings. For instance, female Japanese macaques may sometimes participate in energetic sexual stimulation. Lions, chimpanzees, bison and dolphins have also been spotted in same-sex pairings. And nearly 130 bird species have been observed engaging in sexual activities with same-sex partners. This proves that homosexuality is completely natural, and it is only because of homophobics like you that people consider it to be unnatural. "Some gay friendly heterosexuals are befriending some gays but have no clue that many gays COMMONLY develop crushes on their heterosexual same sex friends. " Having a crush on straight friends is not the same as turning a person gay. "Many gays invite their clueless gay friendly heterosexual friend to their homes and throw on a gay pornography video during a time when the heterosexual has been deeply hurt by their lover of the opposite sex. The gay with the master plan adds some alcohol in the mix and BAM, the stupid gay friendly heterosexual has been sexually seduced and now the dummy thinks he or she must have been born at least a little 'gay'. " Yes, I am sure that this has happened, just as I am sure that there have been many cases in which heterosexual person attended to turn a gay person straight. "Meanwhile, many homophobes such as myself are constantly being bashed, insulted and labeled 'secretly "gay" by gays because WE are too smart to be manipulated and fall for the tricks, lies and gay propaganda. In reality, it is mostly the gay friendly heterosexuals who are getting turned out by gays. After all, they're the ones hanging out with gays, opening up emotionally to gays and in many cases getting intoxicated with gays. " Yes, I am sure that these exist, just as I am sure that there are blogs made by heterosexual people on how to turn a gay person straight. So according to you, heterosexual people turning gay people straight is fine, but vice versa is foolishness and evil? I don't think so.
Donald or Hillary

Donald trump all the way. All thought he does do SAY some pretty crazy things, Hillary's husband DID crazy things. Donald will make a change in America while Hillary will only make a bad change. Hillary should be in jail for her emails, killing people, and promoting the worst things. Hillary will not be a good president. Donald Trump will be better and we might actually get things done like defeating Isis, ridding ourselves of our debt, making good trade deals, and overall leading a better life. Trump is better than Hillary.
school life is wonderful

"And school is the most beautiful experience that is remembered. 95% people have been to school."This is nothing more than conjecture as the validity of the statement cannot be proven, contrarily, it can easily be dismissed using the figures [cite requested] my opponent has provided. If 95% percent of people attended school and 7% percent of that number have attempted suicide, how can the statement be looked at as anything more than personal opinion? Is fact not indisputable? Is it not indicative of the experience as a whole? Nothing seen as "true" can be such only 88% percent of the time. Therefore I conclude that school is not "wonderful" because it is a variable and subject to change. For example, a student in Somalia will not have the same experience or opportunities a student in the U.K would, yet my opponent's blanket stance on the "wonder" of school life would have us believe that both students would cherish their time in school. I disagree.
school life is wonderful

"Free"... Let's ponder this word, shall we? Free as defined by Merrian-Webster: "enjoying personal freedom : not subject to the control or domination of another" This is the complete opposite of school life. In fact, from start to end, a student's actions, activities and even conversations are dictated by the whims and dispositions of the teachers who supervise them. School is nothing more than an interned dictatorship. I'd also like to argue that true freedom (and wonder) exist only after you are through with academics. When you are able to explore the world at your own accord, irrespective of whether a little bell has rung or if a slip of paper has been stamped. That is freedom. And I assure you, it's more wonderful than any school experience.
school life is wonderful

School life is not "awesome" as my opponent has stated. School life is subjective, as is the mind and the tunnel-vision that is nostalgia. Almost anyone who speaks fondly of their school time escapades is not in school, but simply recalling an "easier time" in their life - a time when possibilities were abundant and the world seemed bigger. It's understandable to retreat to these memories but to say that "school life is wonderful" is absurd. Weight issues, bullies, acne, sexuality, and an ever changing and self conscious body are hard enough to deal with even outside the confines of school. So is it any surprise that 7% percent of high school students attempt suicide and twice that number have suicidal thoughts? Apparently these kids did not get my opponents memo.
school life is wonderful

school life is wonderful....!! without any doubt . we learn a lot from our schools. we make friends in school which are really the best and the most useful friends we make in our life. school is place which we miss after passing out. and the moments we make their are very very precious and there is no place like school . there are some rules in school that we miss , and the bunking of periods and throwing papers on teacher , making fun of friends , going to principals office for some problems because of us , teasing friends with a girl/boy. SCHOOL LIFE IS AWESOME...!!!!!!
We Have A Right To Own Guns!

Yes i understand that we have a strong military and it wouldn't be that difficult for a military takeover. But we are only considering one aspect about gun control. We have to look at all the things that taking away guns would do. First of all it is till an ammendment and taking away one amendment could lead to more rights being taken away. We could lose the freedom of speech, we could go back into slavery, or we might not have any more privacy what so ever. How can citizens live like that? It could turn into a totalitarian leadership. Yes I know that we have a problem with gun violence but we have problems with everything. It isn't the guns that are causing problems it is the people using them. we can't have the government in complete control of everybody. Guns are used for a lot of good things too. We have a lot of hunters in the US. We need them to keep the population of wildlife from raising too high. What do we do when there are deer all over the road causing more accidents? Money and lives could be at stake.
We Have A Right To Own Guns!

It is very true that the black market would just sell guns anyway. That is a valid point but you can only control so much. If you make guns illegal than we would be taking a step in the right direction. Sure there will be tons of citizens that just go ahead and buy them off of the black market but, if these are what you call "law abiding citizens" than they would not be break the law in the first place. Also if we were to ban guns, schools would crack down and increase the level security they have because kids could purchase them off of the black market easier. This would result in less school violence. You could also argue that we need guns because what if we need to revolt against the government at some point in the future. I would simply dispute that buy saying that we have 2,271,475 soldiers in the military that would fight for freedom above anything else!
We Have A Right To Own Guns!

Yes I agree it is terrible how many people have been put in bad situations because of gun violence but it still isn't right to take the privilege of owning guns away from law abiding citizens. In the long run it is hurting them. Marijuana is illegal in almost all states but it still seems very common in the black market and it really isn't that hard for people to get it if they want to. Making something illegal creates an urge to get that object even more. Guns will be passed through the black market and criminals will easily get them. What do we do when the criminals have guns and now law abiding citizens are defenseless. Analysis of past shootings shows that places that guns are prohibited have been the target for shooters. People that carry handguns actually scare off the shooter a little or at least make him more hesitant. This was one of the first amendments created and is pretty important. We cant let the government keep taking away rights because soon we won't have any. Thanks for commenting!
We Have A Right To Own Guns!

I do believe that guns are a huge part of American Culture but lately they have made an impact on our lives in a very negative way. One hundred people die in America each year from gun violence! That is two hundred eighty nine people every day. That does not account for all the deaths in America but just imagine if we could save 100,000 people a year. It is estimated that around 1 million kids have brought a gun to school at least once this year! The pre-frontal cortex is in charge of decision making and none of these kid's pre-frontal cortexes are done developing. Therefore none of these adolescents are going to make educated thought-out decisions when carrying these guns. We are hurting ourselves by allowing guns in America. If you argue, "well it is in the constitution" then the response I will give you is no where in the constitution does it say that gay people can't marry yet we deny them that civil right so why can't we change the constitution to make a few improvements to our society.
We Have A Right To Own Guns!

Do you believe in freedom and your rights as a citizen of the United States of America? The U.S. has 27 amendments that give the citizens certain rights. There is one amendment that is on the path to being taken away. The second amendment states that "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." There has been lots of discussion about this right. Do you think that the government should be playing around with our rights that have been in place for hundreds of years? Does the banning of guns and extreme gun control go against our rights as a U.S. citizen? WE believe that there should be very limited gun control. A Law abiding citizen should not have guns taken away from them. They are a huge importance to american culture and history. This world would not be the same without them. Yes, Gun violence is bad and lives are taken every year because of shootings. It isn't the gun that kills people. Car accidents kill 10 times as many people every year and we are not considering banning cars. Why take something away from somebody that hasn't done anything wrong?
I am koolkid

My opponent has only repeated his point, yet he has not successfully done anything to prove that my name is not legitimately "koolkid" (username-wise) or "Kool Kid" (birth name-wise). I have proven to you that my username is koolkid as my profile clearly states so and that my birth name is "Kool Kid" as has been mentioned within the details in my profile. I will not add in my birth certificate for privacy reasons. I don't like my name, but there's nothing that can be done to change it.
I am koolkid

First of all, you spelt "kool" incorrectly. Poor spelling is not cool, it is quite the opposite. Secondly, just because your username is "koolkid", does not mean that you are a cool kid. My username name could be "TheHamburglar" but that does not necessarily mean that I burgle hams. As for your claim that your first name is "kool," and your last name is "kid," I find this to be highly unlikely. I would like to see some proof of this.
Whose view of life is better? (Secular View)

People respond to incentives. The are motivated by what motivates them. They act to optimize utility, and they do this by subconsciously noting the marginal utility of performing an action. In other words, how much pleasure is derived from performing a certain action one more time. According to the Law of Decreasing Marginal Utility, the more times an action is done, the less marginal utility that action brings. Eventually, the marginal utility is so small that the person making the decision switches to another action to get more marginal utility. This is how people work. This is how people make decisions. They determine the course of action that best benefits them. Now, one could make a point about altruism. In theory, altruistic behavior is entirely selfless; however, people often like or want to help people. This implies that helping people brings the "altruistic" person happiness. They are motivated by an emotional incentive, and that is why they help people. When you look at it, people respond to four different types of incentives: social, emotional, moral, and economic. Social motivations are those that advance one's social desires. Whether that is making or losing friends, it is a powerful motivator for human actions. People want to look good in the eyes of others. Emotional motivations include what I described above about "altruism". People act in ways that make them feel good and prevent them from feeling bad. Moral motivations are the religious motivations. People act in ways that guarantee them happiness in the afterlife and prevents them from eternal damnation. Economic motivations include any action that advances someone's economic status by making them wealthier. This one is the most self explanatory. Each action fits into one of the above categories. Each action benefits the person performing the action. Each decision is made with the intention of advancing one's desires. Lastly, all of the decisions are made utilizing the marginal utility rule.
Whose view of life is better? (Secular View)

Your life comes down to a series of yes's and no's. Humans try to maximize our individual lives but making the right choices of yes's and no's. This could be represented by a binary number of 0's and 1's for an individual's life. And all the lives of all the people on Earth maybe even some aliens make up a giant number. And there's more. The position of every atom and molecule is a 0 and 1. The movement of every atom and molecule. The spin of the electron around the orbital. 0 and 1. The entire universe that we live can be composed up of 0's and 1's. If it was possible to obtain that knowledge, then we would know the entire course of the universe. Our universe is merely one giant number being manipulated by time and space. Me typing this sentence is only happening because time and space wrote in invisible number code for me to do this. But what causes the 0's and 1's. Well, that very well may have been decided before the big bang. For you see, in order for the sequence of numbers to begin, it must be determined before the big bang that way the atoms and molecules will have a direction to travel in. But what actually decided what that number would be. I believe that if we find that answer then we will hold the secret to time and space and the ability to manipulate the numbers in a way to allow a realm of possibilities that we humans never thought imaginable and then who knows what will happen then.But do you know what I think is the most remarkable of all. The question "why is it that way?" will still be the unanswered question of our life time. What I want to be able to answer is the impossible. I'm not talking about the type of question like "Is this statement false?" where the very fabric of the question makes it unsolvable like the square root of negative one. I am talking about know the super reason for existence. Not the big bang. But rather the cause of the big bang and the cause of the cause of the big bang. I want to know "why?"Because if we learn the answer to why then the universe will be finally understood and the truly oldest question will be answered "What is the meaning of life?" and "For what purpose do I live" Thank you for taking a minute to jump into my mind. I hope this changed the way you think about everything.
Whose view of life is better? (Secular View)

This is not really a debate. It is just a fun way of seeing how you view life. I will make my statement of life in the second round. Round 1 should be only an acceptance otherwise you won't hav much to say round 2. The voters can do a few things1. Which side they most agree with2. Which side touched them the most3. Which side uses the most logicthere are no restictions for the voting just explain why you vote the way you doOh this is the MOST IMPORTANT PART of the debate. This should be ones SECULAR OUTLOOK ON LIFE. Not merely ones religious views other than that good luck to my debator.
Christianity is Reasonable- Atheism is Not.

1. You still haven't given validity that god exists. For your argument to be logical, you must find evidence that god exists.2. Exactly by not wanting to blaspheme god, you can't show where you get your logic from if god doesn't exist. Face the truth, i don't need to unless you fully justify your reasoning by proving god exists with concrete scientific evidence3. Science can't lie4. It's called semantics5. The moral standard is made up by a majority of people in a nation6. I am obfuscating it the same amount as you7. Our debate is about the fact that god doesn't exist and to prove a fact you must give a fact. As you told me stop obfuscating the answer and answer "why do you think the world is 6,000 years old ", because byy not answering you are proving my point that you can't prove god exists and that the world is 6'000 years old. So try to prove this and stop avoiding the questions