My Case Against Miscegenation.

The fact is, evolutionarily speaking, it is extremely beneficial for different groups of a species with vast differences to assimilate and become one. Will the effects may appear negative at the start, overtime it benefits the entire species as a whole. Different groups around the globe have different genetics. And overtime, genes which give a host an advantage tend to become more common, as this leads to more offspring. Eventually, if given time, most if not all of a certain group will have this "advantage". And this happens all over the world. Miscegenation causes these genes to be more widespread, and is used by nature to evolve a species overtime. Lets say in Country A, a single person evolves a slightly stronger immune system. This person will survive longer than most, and in their lifetime will produce more offspring than one who doesn't have this evolutionary advantage. This will cause more of their offspring being into Country A and over generations all of Country A will have this gene. Now lets say Country B had this exact process occur, but the gene that evolved gave the population stronger skin. This prevents them from being cut as easily and lowers the amount of opportunities to get injured or infected. Now lets say 1 person from each country breeds together. Now their offspring has the best of both world, and as such, this will benefit everyone. Win Win right? On the topic of "preserving" the European minority, to do such a thing would be extremely destructive to the race. Overtime, the genes of the people would become similar, and pushed back by other races who actually bred with other races. It would eventually make it so that undesirable genes would be spread out throughout the race, and would slowly kill them. Cancer would only be one of the problems, diseases would flourish as the race would be genetically similar. What is currently happening to bananas would happen to whites. A disease would figure out how to flourish inside a European, and as such would crack the code for the rest of the race. Dogs are another prime example. People like pure bred dogs a lot. And as such, we have bred them to the point where they have cancer which is contagious. Just let that sink in for a moment. Keeping their blood pure, to preserve their "heritage" is going against mother nature, and makes the species pay for it. Pure Breds are extremely vulnerable to cancer and other diseases. https://en.wikipedia.org... The idea and theory of "Pure Blood" has been around for millennia. In fact, it has directly caused many empires to fall, directly and indirectly. Many jewish are now against keeping their race pure, as that is already impacting them. Miscegenation also preserves the heritage of race. Its just in the DNA. Holding back evolution is not what we should waste our time doing. No one judges European people for not allowing miscegenation. If someone has their preference, they have their preference. No one cares, or judges if you marry a black or white. In fact Europeans aren't even a minority in the grand scheme of things, if you look at it, there are many other races much, much more in danger of dying out. Preserving the heritage is not a "good" thing, its unnecessary and useless. And next time you think of this, please remember this is one of the main reasons of the holocaust. It was one of Hitlers main ideologies. And look where it got him.