There exists at least one scientific flaw in the Qur'an

1- Semen ProductionMy opponent shows narrow sight. He considers his own boundaries the only standard. For example, saying that a human have his head or torso between his shoulders can be linguistically correct. It may reefer to the lower rips to the loin (Which I used as a basis for my argument). It may linguistically reefer to the whole torso.I would like to inform my opponent that there is no such thing as a justified argument from authority. An argument from authority is confirming something to be true because an authority stated it. Even if we assume that the said person is an authority, his statements are not necessarily true or might reefer to something else.I have also noticed that my opponent have not rebutted the arguments he apparently found online from Dr. Zakir Naik. He only used a personal incredibility, a fallacy, to justify his disagreement. Just because you find it hard to understand or imagine something does not make it untrue. So you will have to also prove that this interruption is scientifically incorrect in order to justify the resolution. Plus, the Quran is known to be rhetorical, and the previous verse asks us to think of what we are created from.The existence of one scientifically correct interruption would nullify the resolution.Therefore my opponent have to:1- Show that the Quran linguistically reefer to his interruption of between. He also have the choice to prove that no linguistic meaning can include seminal vesicle.2- Show that the verse cannot reefer to the embryonic origin of the sexual organs. He may start by proving that they do not originate in that area. The mentioning of the blood supply is mere indicator that they did originate there.I remind my opponent that the burden of proof is on him, and he must refute all scientifically correct interruptions.2- Earthquakes and MountainsI sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding or possible offending, that was a mistake from my part, but I did not in any way intend to trick my opponent or misinterpret the Quran.But my point stands that the Quran does not reefer to earthquakes. Narrated Anas: The Prophet () ascended the mountain of Uhud and Abu Bakr, `Umar and `Uthman were accompanying him. The mountain gave a shake (i.e. trembled underneath them) . The Prophet () said, "O Uhud ! Be calm." I think that the Prophet () hit it with his foot, adding, "For upon you there are none but a Prophet, a Siddiq and two martyrs." Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 5, Book 57, Hadith 49This hadith shows that they did not believe mountains prevents earthquakes. What can it refeer to then?I stumbled upon this hadith which is related to the verse:Anas bin Malik narrated that:The Prophet said: “When Allah created the earth, it started shaking. So He created the mountains, and said to them: ‘Upon it’ so it began to settle.Vol. 6, Book 44, Hadith 3369So it does not necessarily mean that it will stabilize the earth in the future. Now, is the long awaited scientific proof part:Mountain belts, also called orogens, are the factories where stable continental crust is originated. They run along thousands of kilometres on the Earths surface and depict an almost linear geometry, occasionally interrupted by curved tracts. We search the importance of those curved tracts in the mountain belts, if they constitute a tectonic structure by themselves and, if so, what is its relevance. The relevance of the curved mountain belts is of timely importance in understanding whether they are caused by crustal or lithospheric processes, if they are the answer to sudden stress changes, if they provide efficient pathways for fluid circulation in the crust and, fundamentally, what processes cause them. [1]continental shield, any of the large stable areas of low relief in the Earth’s crust that are composed of Precambrian crystalline rocks. The age of these rocks is in all cases greater than 540 million years, and radiometric age dating has revealed some that are as old as 2 to 3 billion years. [2] The Precambrian Shield is an extensive structural unit of the Earth's crust composed of exposed basement rocks formed during the Archean or Proterozoic eons which together comprise the Precambrian Era ending 544 million years ago. Originally formed during several rounds of mountain-building activity, Shield rocks are now among the most stable on Earth. The Precambrian mountain belts have since eroded away, creating the low, rolling rock plain we see today. The best-known examples are the Canadian Shield and the Baltic Shield in Scandinavia. [3]craton, the stable interior portion of a continent characteristically composed of ancient crystalline basement rock. The term craton is used to distinguish such regions from mobile geosynclinal troughs, which are linear belts of sediment accumulations subject to subsidence (i.e., downwarping). The extensive central cratons of continents may consist of both shields and platforms. A shield is that part of a craton in which (usually) Precambrian basement rocks crop out extensively at the surface. By contrast, in a platform the basement is overlain by horizontal or subhorizontal sediments. [4]What is today a 3.5 billion year old craton was, 3.5 billion years ago, the roots of a major mountain range, indicating that orogeny driven by plate tectonics was already occurring well before 3.5 billion years ago. It is also interesting to note that isostasy calculations for a 13,000 foot ocean depth (the average depth of the abyssal plains of all major oceans today) yields a 50,000 foot maximum thickness for ocean deposited sediments. In many places on the earth, geologists have documented 50,000 feet of horizontally laid marine sediments, in some cases in formations as much as a billion years old, but nowhere has this author seen any reports of marine sedimentary deposits greater than 50,000 feet. This suggests that the ocean's depth has remained relatively constant, varying by only a few hundred feet during glacial cycles, for at least the last billion years, implying that the total volume of continental material on earth and the total volume of ocean water have remained essentially unchanged as well. [5]Therefore, we can conclude that mountains were essential in the creation of the most stable parts of the crust. Debatably, making the earth habitable.We can conclude that the Quran was correct about that statement. Thus, the resolution is nullified.[1] http://www.brynmawr.edu...[2] http://global.britannica.com...[3] http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com...[4] http://global.britannica.com...[5] http://dlblanc.com...