Resolved: Military Conscription is unjust

First off, I apologize that Im goin to have to do this. I wouldve liked to have an actual debate but I guess Ill still treat this like a real round. Extend my definition and analysis of Justice. Since justice is inherent in the resolution we now are evaluating the resolution from the standpoint of who is consistently providing individual's his due. Extend my Value criterion, maximizing individual welfare. The revelance this has in the round is now the debate is focused on can provide the most welfare to individuals and prevent the least amount of welfare from being lost. This is the key tool being used to determine if each person is being provided his or her due. Extend my first Contention cleanly across the board. Contention 1 states, A Military Conscription would harm individuals because it harms retention rates which would cause the need for more soldiers and possibly increase casualties. Doug Bandow, senior fellow at the Cato Institute writes, A draft brings in untrained first termers, not experienced pilots. And conscripts, who don't want to be in uniform, reenlist in far lower numbers than do volunteers. Only 10 percent of first termers stayed in the military when service was mandatory compared with about 50 percent today under the AVF(all volunteer force). To reiterate, The impact is that with 40 percent retention rate of lower infantry-men in the armed forces under conscription, more men would be forced to serve against their interest directly violating my value criterion by putting more lives in danger. This shows a direct violation of justice by my opponent since there is no incentive for these men to remain in the army creating the need to draft more men creating a perpetual cycle of possible harm to the individuals in the army. Now the whole affirmative case was dropped but I'll chose to focus more of the violation of Justice I provide at the bottom of the case. We see violations of Justice from military conscription on 4 counts: 1. it creates an inequality of individual welfare by harming the ability of federal government to provide adequate medical treatment to its wounded soldiers 2. it removes incentives and tangable benefits from an all volunteer army that could otherwise be provided by the affirmative side, which prevents more justice from being provided 3. it harms a military's ability to adequately protect its soldiers in armed conflict by reducing the quality and training of its soldiers 4. it creates a perpetual cycle of continued conscription by creating the need to draft more soldiers from low retention rates. This effectively puts more soldiers at risk in armed conflict by continually putting undertrained forces on the front lines harming massive amounts of individual welfare. Extend each one across the flow. These four violations show my opponent has an enormous defiect of Justice and individual welfare in the negative world, while the affirmative world provides a non arbitrary consistency of treating its citizens. I dont want to provide overkill (Im trying to be a nice guy), so Ill only make one more important extension. Extend my Robert E. Litan, vice president and director of the Brookings Economic Studies Program card which comes to the conclusion that such a program will equal 70 billion dollars of federal money. Also extend my, Brad Knickenbocker, staff writer at the Christian Science Monitor, card 20,174 have been wounded in Iraq and Afganistan while 2,955 American service men and women have been killed (2,622 in Iraq and 333 in Afghanistan). What this shows is my opponent lacks fiscal disclipine in the negative world by inadequately spending billions of dollars of a perpetual cycle of drafting while ignoring thousands of wounded and dead soldiers who deserve to be given medical treatment and funeral expenses from the federal government. This is a clear violation of individual welfare and Justice by providing a negative inequality of recieving his or her due. This shows the negative can never link to Justice because of this atrocous violation. Therefore, I urge an affirmative ballot.