BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
life

Come on BEE nice?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!yo?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Laws against voluntary polygamous marriages are just

Can my opponent counter ay of the following points in any way? t’s glorified infidelity. It would be difficult for the government to tax. Relationships should be between two people. Couples have to make decisions and compromises together, and it’s harder to agree when there’s multiple people. Polygamous relationships can end up with too many children. The world is already overpopulated. Polygamy is almost never polyandry. It’s not about women’s freedom to choose who they marry or how many spouses they have- it’s about women being owned by men. Marriage is a partnership and a relationship. Polygamy turns marriage into a cattle drive. Polygamy skews the natural ratio of marriageable men and women. Most people agree that countries that practice polygamy live in an oppressive, abusive society with fanatical, religious men- especially when they marry young girls to older men. Spouses can have animosity, jealousy, etc towards other the other spouses and it creates tension. The established needs are impossible to meet in a polygamist marriage. These needs include- ongoing affection/attention, conversation, honesty and openness, financial support, and help around the house. In all polygamous cultures, women have extremely low status. True love is a bond that is only possible to be shared between two people. Most North American “families” in polygamous situations are on welfare or food stamps. Polygamy is a choice, while sexual orientations are not choices. Legalizing polygamy would give more power to religions, and would infringe on women’s rights. Legal polygamy would turn immigration into a nightmare. An immigrant can claim to be wed to half a nation of women and demand that all these women be brought to, say, the US. Polygamists can arrive at the border and demand refugee status because of persecution. Sorting out these claims would be impossible, since most nations refuse to give legal status to such marriages.
Laws against voluntary polygamous marriages are just

It is unfortunate that my opponent was unable to respond to my arguments, so I will try to make my arguments this round briefer. I would first like to address my definition of polygamy, which has gone unrefuted. Talbott"s definition of legal paternalism is "the enactment and enforcement or paternalistic laws," which can be either weak (also called soft) or strong (also called hard).[1] This definition is important because it supports the first premise of my syllogism in C3. Next, my argument in C1 went unrefuted as well. This Millian argument showed that a certain type of legal paternalism (strong/hard) is not just. This argument is significant because it proves the second premise of my syllogism in C3. My opponent also failed to refute my argument in C2. This showed that laws against voluntary polygamous marriages are not weak/soft paternalism because they fail to meet the criteria of such forms of paternalism. This argument is important because it supports the third premise of my syllogism in C3. Finally, with all of the premises of my syllogism warranted, my conclusion (that laws against voluntary polygamous marriage are not just) necessarily follows. As a reminder, the following is the syllogism to which I am referring. 1-Paternalism is either strong/hard or weak/soft (by definition) 2-Strong (or hard) legal paternalism is not just (by C1) 3-Laws against voluntary polygamous marriages are not weak/soft paternalism (by C2) 4-Therefore, laws against voluntary polygamous marriage are strong/hard paternalism (by disjunctive syllogism 1, 3) 5-Therefore, laws against voluntary polygamous marriage are not just (by identity 2, 4) I have already supported 1-3. 4 follows from a disjunctive syllogism of premises 1 and 3. Because laws against polygamy are a type of paternalism, which is either strong/hard or weak soft and laws against voluntary polygamous marriage are not weak/soft, they must be strong/hard. 5, which disproves the resolution, necessarily follows because of the rules of identity on 2 and 4. Laws against voluntary polygamous marriage are strong/hard paternalism, strong/hard paternalism is not just; thus, laws against voluntary polygamous marriage are not just. This relies on the same reasoning that tells us that when A=B and B=C that A=C. [1] Talbott, William. "Weak and Strong Legal Paternalism." Which Rights Should Be Universal? Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. Print. (Pg. 53)
Laws against voluntary polygamous marriages are just

Four rounds: 1-Acceptance 2-Arguments (and rebuttal by of 1st argument by 2nd debater) 3-Initial Rebuttals 4-Final Rebuttals and Concluding Statements For Pro to uphold resolution s/he must show that laws against voluntary polygamous marriages ARE just and not simply that they CAN be just. For Con to successfully negate he must show that laws against voluntary polygamous marriage ARE not just and not simply that they CAN be unjust.
Football is for women as well as men.

I did not check every state's laws for everything. I searched three reliable sites for "States that have laws against girls playing American Football", and I did not find anything against them playing football. The biggest thing against women playing football was that they should find a different sport to play. Others call it "Abusive" for a woman to play football. However, I do not find this t obe abusive, and if it happened to be abusive, you could not blame coaches, teamates, or the opposing team, you blame her for getting into this game. This was a very fine debate. Thank you for your time, and good luck.
Football is for women as well as men.

First of all, Did you read the Youth Football rules for all 49 other states? Also, as the age increase for players, so does the competitiveness among players. When you have read the NMAA rules for High School football then you can rebuke me, but until then your argument on youth rules is invalid. YAFL allows females to play because, although we are competitive, we will not intentionally hurt them unless a player is a sociopath. I'm not doubting a women;s ability to play football I'm just saying that they would be a distraction and would not all be able to play the amount of required playing time. Don't get me wrong, omen can play but very few have the stamina and concentration to compete at the high school level. Let me ask you something, specifically what playing level are we talking about? you started with Professional but then we moved to high school and YAFL. There is another youth football league on the East Coast ( POP WARNER ) that encourages women play the good sport of football, but like I said before there is no platform for women's professional football anywhere in our country.... BTW Augusta National Division is NCAA not pro. thank you.
Football is for women as well as men.

Reading the laws of other states, there is no law that says something like 7B: Women can't play football with men. There are absolutely no laws in other states that say that women can't play football. With my football experience, I have seen girls playing the sport. You know too,we played Atrisco Valley, and that girl who played as well, if not better, than some of the boys we have seen playing. Also, I have seen in a few, but not all of the High Schools have at least one girl playing for their team.There is one girl division The Augusta National division, which is for girls. Also, with some research I have found that there are girl football divisions in Germany. Not the "soccer" type football, as they call it in England, but actual American-type football. So yes, there are girl divisions for American football.
Football is for women as well as men.

Your argument id valid, however there is no other professional level of football in America other than the NFL (National Football League ) and the Arena Football League ( NOT sure on actual name ) which also prohibits women from playing. some states may vary on rules, but in New Mexico women are prohibited from playing football with men ( due to age and other variables), and there isnt enough interested women in football to create a whole division just for women. Besides if Women were aloud to play football they would be a distraction, and studies have proven that they fatigue faster then Men.
Football is for women as well as men.

Many people say that women can not play football. However, I have found that when they say this, they say women are weak. Women are not given the chance to try football past the Young American Football League (YAFL). But if men think women can't play because of politics, they are not familiar with the laws. You can not put anybody under you, all men are created equal. he only league that prohibits women from completely playing is the NFL. So yes, girls have all the right to play outside the NFL.
Rap Battle

Are you done? Had your fun? I did too took too long to respond after round 2 I move words around like i'm movin' the planets out of gravitational orbit Like a black whole, i take the energy given to me, absorb it like hot porridge I went back to time, taught you the basics that i transported of the softest I'm talkin about you, it's only the survival of the strongest, your line is discordant Like a surgeon, i'm performin' a lobotomy cuz your committin a false dichotomy undeservin' of a robotically enhanced brain neurology, a primitive physiology With such complexities within my rhyme schemes, givin you chills, nanotechnology Derive their etymology and you'll discover that it all leads to the same sovereignty A theocracy hidden within the beginning of time, so just bite this terminology You cannot step up to my fluidity, my pure masculinity like salinity, i wreck the vicinity I worship the highest form of divinity but lyrically, bleedin you out for all eternity I don't need an affinity with the modernity of unity, i'm not establishin serenity Acknowledge that your existence is just a pest as i'm rippin you to shreds Like Ed Gein, i'm takin you apart, dissectin you, startin with your eggs n' legs Homie stop rapping, cuz your bars are easily calculated with mental webs I've had it with you so i'ma drop the nuke then drop the bio weapon to the weak! Make everyone catch Ebola n' make everyone puke n' now you reached your peak! You never knew what it's like to be a rapper with great flow, switch em up dual Like a dynamic duo, your going to face a destructive and unforgettable blow As of right now, close your eyes, your life is endin' just like the passin shadow
Rap Battle

Welcome to the third round, the one where you drown on my words and yours, the sensation'll make you frown. Obviously, you didn't get it, clown, that was your chance to back down, but I guess this'll be my gift to your town... The day the cat is let out of the bag and truth is put in and slung around, dropped down in a vat of battery acid and passive traps waiting at the top for another sound... None. Maybe you've finally found that your sh*t ain't good? You ain't superman; never meet tall h*es in a single bound, but you are single now, but so is every other brother, living with his mother, asking the bartender for another round. Yeah, my bars are a little stacked, but my flow is wicked worse than the witch of the west. I'm putting on my Sunday best, attempt the test, how many people you think'll show up to truth's funeral as willing guests? Well, there's me and.... I guess I'll wait for the rest. I dressed a little too nicely for a b*tch attesting to his skills, who lives in live action roleplay. "Oh, look, another quest!" See, I let you go first, 'cause I knew you'd need that extra round! Pig comes up and destroys you in two, "Truth is down! We found him on the ground, in a bloodied up ball gown, with a crayon sticking out his back, wearing a jagged crown!" But you won't be on a crucifix and you'll die for your own sins! No one should have to listen to your rhymes, even your kin! And to be honest, in your skull is the best place for your pen. So leave it there, stop scratching your chin, trying to think of another rebuttal, or some rebound to win. You're done. It's over. There's no, "How have you been?" It's just the people refusing your sh*t, zero out of ten. So try and grab a freestyle chemical, shoot up the syringe! Because unless you bend your genetics, rap is gonna leave you like self-esteem from girls who binge. Come on it's okay! Type your resignation and then hit send. It won't be a debate why you quit; not investigated in Fringe. So, show me something I haven't seen... a good lyric would be nice. One that has a little flavor like Mexican spice. But since all your full of is caffeine and sh*t, I ain't enticed by your words, just tired of hearing what you spit. I've had it with the truth, it always comes with a price! Boring, lengthy bullsh*t that runs around like mice. So, I'm done with this, I need a new vice. I'm almost considering apologizing for my verse and replacing it with lies.
Rap Battle

your bars are uneven like a bone deformity one is longer than the other, not in conformity it appears that your bars are genetically disabled to battle me, you lack the capacity to be able Hey buddy why are you so sad and down? oh wait that's just a midget on the ground You look like you vomited all that bull crap When I told you to rap, you did exactly that You went to Taco bell and bought a wrap Then you threw up and said "that's that" truth must be very confusing, you're listening to so many Devils you going to the top on an elevator is wrong on so many levels God hates f*gs? Well I guess that means you time to take the sword and run you through your win score ratio is precisely zero to zero I'm wiping you out like the emperor Nero
Rap Battle

Hey, everybody look! It's Slash! He's back to battle Capitalist with a bag of hash! But wait, he ain't smokin' and where's the top hat at? Oh, this is bad? Mad Hatter took his style and his smile! He looks so sad! But not even God can bring you back from this battle we've had! Not like you'll make it to heaven, anyways. Didn't you know God hates f*gs? Ouch! Don't get offended, I'm about 50% sure you're a dude, so I know you ain't on the rag. Don't want you to freeze up, though, this ain't a game, can't blame this on the lag! Let me give you a little taste of the truth. You're best chance for survival is wavin' the white flag. And we've all seen the proof in the bars above, so just go back to COD 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Halo, GTA, and stay away or you'll find out the truth from inside your very own body bag. But I'll keep going just to make sure you get the point. There's no one to match me, no one to appoint. So when you finally throw in the towel and roll a joint, Lay off my d*ck, "But Pig, just allow me to anoint!" No, stay off my nuts! If you got the guts to face me, then realize when the battles won! No coming back to suck up, because done is done! There's no rappin' it iller, no more Slash, never was clashin' a killer. It was just bashin' an enlightenment f*g, smashin' his mask, taking his identity and crashin' it into the masses, to show that it's just another stay at home looter, with no homies and no bros, just a bronie, with a hard-on to put on a fa"ade as a rapper, time to tell 'em the truth, phony. It's time to go home and announce the real you. A fool, with no tool under his belt to change the rules. 'Cause that's the only way you'll win against me, I got the jewels. I just do whatever I want, that's the way I do. So, when you're tellin' me I've never even been in a debate, I just sit and drool? Please, let's go by record... What's yours, uh 50 : 62? (Wins : Losses)
Rap Battle

I'm a communist, we are throwing a party and we're doing it big my homies asked me "what you cooking?" i said "a capitalist pig " when I scroll through your profile,all I see is regression no honors, no awards, no wins, it's the great depression in this battle, this is just an absolute monarchy I made your whole country turn into anarchy do you know why your going to lose? Why your bankrupt? its cuz you're already broke, you suck so go self destruct! before you die, I just wanted to sing a national anthem money equals power, so I'm holding you for ransom I'm a corrupt political leader,influence the people when it comes to human status, we're not equal he says that money is not the root of all evil Where's your society? dawg you got no people! On his opinions, he says that money is well paid, only fair for all trade for you that's what I forbade, I killed this fat greedy pig with a switchblade! on one of these poles, he says "time is a measurement not a literal force" Let me to change your mind, erase your history, and alter your future course your mother so stupid, she went to Craigslist trying to find the right house rejected all the black, yellow, green houses, just trying to find the White House you know what's demented?the fact that you can't protect yourself with the First Amendment I'm a dangerous and destructive descendant, my word's law, so you have absolutely no defendant
Is it ok for a women to kick a guy in the balls

Alright, I'll make this short and sweet. Men and women are not built the same. Men are built more physically, so it makes sense that it is easier to overpower a women then it would be another man of equal muscle mass. This is why rape happens, because men get carried away and does what ever he wants. This would an example of a time when it would be okay. When she is about to be raped, or assaulted, or anything similar, it is fine for her to do it. Thanks
Who should be the next President of the United States? Donald Trump(Pro)......Hillary Clinton(Con)

Hello all! I am I favor of Mr. Donald J. Trump becoming the President of the United States. I believe that Hillary Clinton is a lying corrupt criminal. I will argue for Mr. Trump and Con will argue for Clinton. Thank You, and I hope this will be good debate. Please no trolling or rude behavior. Citations should be used if can. Good Luck to Con! The format of this debate is as follows: Round 1: Acceptance Only Round 2: Arguments....NO REBUTTALS Round 3: Rebuttals and Arguments Round 4: Rebuttals/Conclusion Report this Argument
Who should be the next President of the United States? Donald Trump(Pro)......Hillary Clinton(Con)

I wish Con good luck and hope we can have a good debate as well! Some of my contentions will come from a previous debate against a troll. Contention 1: Mr. Trump is not a politically correct person. He sees and tells the truth the way it is and is non political correctness is approved by many Americans.[1] By being politically correct, issues cannot get solved, like the issue of Radical Islam and the issue of Illegal Immigration. Muslims must be banned in order to prevent more terrorist attacks in the United States. As for current Muslim citizens, there should be a registered database for them. For Illegal Immigration, the illegals came here ILLEGALY. They broke the law to get here and they should be punished by being deported. There is no need to be politically correct and say children would be separated from mothers. They should've thought about that before coming to the U.S. Illegally. It just proves that many people think that America is stupid and won't enforce immigration laws. And what does Hillary propose? Amnesty for all illegals which is ridiculous.[2]A wall must be built to stop all of these illegal aliens from coming and ruining lives of Americans. The wall would only cost about 17 billion dollars.[3]This is within the margin of the 58 billion trade deficit America has with Mexico.[4] The next round is for rebuttals and second contention. http://www.rasmussenreports.com... https://www.hillaryclinton.com... http://m.imgur.com... https://ustr.gov... In the next round, I will say why Hillary Clinton wouldn't be a good POTUS.
Dance Is Not a Sport

Before I begin I would like to say that I myself am an avid ballet dancer. I value dance too highly to call it a sport. Jake Vander Ark says the following about the difference between dance and sports: "In sports, the objective is to win... tossing a toy back and forth to accomplish mindless objectives. ... In sports, winning is the endgame. players win so they can win so men can buy beer and congratulate each other for sitting in front of a TV, cheering on athletes... who provide meaningless entertainment that artificially heightens emotion. I can't think of anything lower. And dance is anything but low." Calling dance something other than a sport does not degrade its difficulty or its value, it actually heightens it.
Dance Is Not a Sport

While I do agree that there are emotionally and physically demanding aspects to both dance and sports, there are too many differences between them to call dance a sport itself. For example, the "judgements" in dance are subjective, and up to each individual to decide. There is basic technique, but there is also room for artistic interpretation. The main difference however, is the storytelling aspect of dance. Dance exists to tell a story through movement and music. That is something sports simply do not do. Yes, they are both physically demanding, but dance requires an acting ability and a storytelling aspect that is simply not present in sports.