Absolute Morality proves Biblical Creation

"Darwin said, "At some future period, Not very distant as measured by centuries, . . . . . . . " === Don't confuse Darwin and Evolution. Scientists, Based on Darwin's idea, Had rigorously define what they mean by evolution. Im not going to defend what Darwin said because not everything he said is considered relevant to evolution. As an analogy, Just because Wagner wrote music, And he was an anti-semite, Doesnt mean that music is anti-semitic "Therefore USSR did not fall because of their mass murder of people" === OK, That's a too sophisticated example for the evolution of murder-prohibition. Humans already realized that murder is wrong longgggg time ago. Also, You havent explain to me how a society that allow its member to kill can persist thru time. "You have to show me a society that was only destroyed because they murdered a certain group in their society. " === you see, You have to strawman my argument to be able to even say something about it. Killing a certain group is DIFFERENT than allow killing universally among arbitrary members. I claim that if you allow killing universally among members regardless of races, Sexes, . . . Then such a society cannot persist thru time. All of the example you give like Greece allow killing of a CERTAIN baby does not refute my argument because my claim was different. Also, Those societies did EVENTUALLY collapse. You said they didn't collapse right away which I agree because I never said those societies would collapse the moment they were in place. " Would you accept a society that decides that decides that the society can kill all atheists and humanists" === Think about what you just said. A society includes atheists so obviously atheists wouldnt suddenly decide to kill themselves. Plus, The majority of scientists (think penicillin, Vaccination, Anatomy. . . ) are atheists so I dont think that killing atheists would "an advantage for survival for Christians". "Society often changes its opinion. One clear example is in regard to "gay marriage. " What was considered morally wrong by most of society is now legal, Applauded, And celebrated by some groups. "=== explain how gay marriage has to do with survival of society. " If society is the moral compass, Then the compass never points north but rather jumps all over the place and changes with every generation. " === exactly, Morality evolves. "Or what about certain Muslim groups? Few would agree that blowing up innocent civilians, Slaughtering hundreds of people from other religious groups, Kidnapping and enslaving women, Or using children as suicide bombers is morally acceptable. Yet if morality is simply societal preference, What right does our society have to tell their society that their actions are wrong and must be stopped? "=== ironic but you do realize the motivation for those things is religion right? This just go to show that the world would be extremely dangerous if you take religion morality instead of using logic to decide which policy is better for all. Also, Like you, They also take their religious beliefs seriously where those actions are justified. How do you know that you're not being just like them when you bash gay marriage. "Nazi Germany decided as a society that these actions were morally acceptable"=== the society decided? Or the leaders? You see, No society would be stupid enough to collectively agree to wage war so that they can all be split from their family and die. " What right does our society have to judge their society if morality is simply a societal preference? " === just leave them be. Those with bad morality will dies out. "If we are simply chemical accidents, As evolutionists contend, Why should we feel compelled to behave in a particular fashion? "==== because if we didn't behave like we do, We would simply not exist. "If laws of morality are just what bring the most happiness to the most people, Then why would it be wrong to kill just one innocent person if it happened to make everyone else a lot happier? " ==== did I ever define morality like that? What you just mention was utilitarianism not atheism. "If laws of morality are just the adopted social custom, Then why was what Hitler did wrong? " === well, He murdered. And murder is wrong. Why? Look at my initial post for answers. "How did blind chemistry create morality? " === then let me ask you, How does the zeros and ones in a computer create the Siri or Cortana that you can talk to?