The Australian education system should united and be the same level as the Nsw education system

Ladies and gentleman, I would like to highlight some flaws in my opponents case. I do agree that I had a typo in round one but sadly the opponent have misunderstood my burden of proof for a resolution. As I am from the pro side it should be obvious that The topic should be my resolution. Thus i mentioned a Burden of proof.Con's resolution : "The Australian education should remain the same and have a variety of styles with education." has some major and obvious errors.AS per my interpretation Con has stated that "The Australian education should remain the same" which support my argument and the topic and is false as Australia has state level learning system not nation level. Thus con's resolution is already wrongly word and supports my case.Furthermore Con has written "have a variety of styles with education." to end his/her resolution. This contradicts the first part of the resolution. Thus Con have a very contradicting resolution which has been poverly worded.Furthermore Con(my foolish opponent) has stated my arguements are a mere red herring but has failed to realise that they are not only using a contradicting resolution which supports my case but also he/she are arguing against the wrong topic.For the last 3 rounds Con has only argued against my burden of proof which they think it is the resolution and the topic of the debate. I tried to fix my arguements in round 2 by stating the meaning of "education system" but also made 3 relevant arguements which supports my case and the Topic "The Australian education system should united and be the same level as the Nsw education system".Whereas my opponent has stated argument against my burden of proof rather than the topic.My opponent has proved that he is truly terrible and pathetic at researching strong refrences. Naplan is a decent source but i would like to ask my opponent this question.Where would find smart students in Australia? NSW, ACT or VICI vote for NSW as i donot know of students that are smarter or of equivalent intelligence of the students in James Ruse Agricultural High school. The school which comes top in the state in Naplan and HSC. Have you got a school which can match the excellence of James Ruse in VIC or ACT. Naplan test is an easy test unlike the UNSW ICAS test or The HSC. Compare something which is actually hard. Even my High school which came 120th in the HSC did extremely well in the Naplan. Does that mean students at my school are actually smart? I donot think so. In the common maths test majority of students in my class got below 40/65. How can you justify Naplan to see the diffrences between education system?Thus my argument stand and are actually right and relevant to the topic unlike my opponents argument which are related to the topic but he has mentioned that they are against my burden of proof not the topic.To finish of my case for round 4 I would like to tell my opponents somethings.Hunger for education and success via fierce determination and burning desire is the key to success and all challenges in life. We humans have the capacity to achieve marvellous things as long as we never quit, donot accept no or harsh words, have fierce determination, are willing to work hardwork and have a burning desire we can achieve the impossible. Con, one advice please donot come up with the arguements that students will struggle just because you may have been struggling in your education endavour doesnot mean everyone will struggle.Thank you Readers and Con for the condolence(I did run out of time)Good luck Con Awaiting your reply for round 4