Existence Proves a Creator

Sorry, it does not work that way. A debate has 4 rounds, I will submit a 4th round statement. I have repeatedly asked my opponent to support his statements with reasoning. He has not. I asked him to present his credentials for making statements which require high levels of knowledge, instead he gives me wikipedia links, and says 'there, argue with this article, which I do not understand myself'. He has no personal knowledge or credentials to base his statements on. I asked him over and over to support his reasoning on specific statements he made. He has not. Finally, in a desperate attempt to find out exactly what his own knowledge and opinion is on this subject is. I asked him to be brief and to use his own words. As you can see from his last rambling statement he failed the challenge. Note also that he continues his fascination with the word nothing. I think he must be related to Bill Clinton. I may challenge him to a debate about the meaning of the word 'is'. Every statement ends by him declaring victory if I fail to do something. He wasted more time during this debate correcting my grammar, and prancing around as a pseudo intellectual than he did debating the topic. I repeatedly explained and supported my position in several ways in order to help him better understand my point of view, but I can't find anywhere in four rounds of debate where he explained is position to me. When boiled down this debate consisted of me stating my position, and my opponent saying 'no, it's not'. My general statement: 'Creation proves a Creator' exists. My opponent's typical response: 'no, it doesn't', 'read this article', 'you spelled that wrong', or some type of mocking and/or arrogant statement of my dumbness Brevity is the soul of wit, and my opponent proves the true by demonstrating the opposite. My opponent lost this debate from the outset because he was unable to understand the simple logic of a truism. It is not debatable to know that 'Something cannot come from nothing.' It is a fact. 1)Matter cannot be destroyed or created it can only change forms... 2)An object at rest stays at rest until a force acts upon it... For the purpose of this debate this addition to the to these two physical laws should be added ...except for God The Creator obviously can create matter, and can give it a show to get it all moving. But where there is no matter, it cannot be created, and it sure can't get moving if it's not there. It is very telling that argument against the existence of God the Creator requires the building of Universities and the 'educating' of millions of students twisting themselves into pretzels of logic, inventing hair brained concepts like the multiple types of 'nothingness', arrogance to close minds, fancy words to close eyes. But all that is required to prove that God exists is simple logical statements. Something cannot come from Nothing Existence proves the Creator Creation proves a Creator Here is some additional information for those of you with open minds and open hearts. This information is for those who seek the truth. www.6000years.org Preview: Physical evidence exists for the parting of Red Sea, the remain chariots under the sea, a demon topped bell found inside a lump of coal in W.Virginia, and Noah's Ark was discovered a long time ago and Turkey built a National Park around it. I thank my opponent, and pray for him. If you read his profile, you'll see he self-describes himself as a Satanist, which explains his incoherent statements, his pseudo-intellectual arrogance, and his willful ignorance. It is a sad fact at tare's exist.