Freedom of expression should not be supressed by accusations of sexism.

First, I don't see how any of my opponent's past debates have any relevance to this one. If the point he was trying to make was that he does not agree with the resolution as-written, that's fine. Seeing as how this is a debate, it doesn't matter whether or not he agrees with this topic or others -- the point is that he must argue his position effectively. Second, in referencing Carlos Mencia in relation to my opponent, I was merely suggesting that Pro's "jokes" about Condy's race/job were trite, as are many of Carlos'jokes. Third, I would like to commend my opponent for being so quick-witted and insightful as to decipher the clear meaning behind my username. He assumes that with a username like theLwerd, I must be a lesbian. .. Right, because there are NO other words in the English language that begin with the letter L. Further, obviously if my username was theDwerd, it would mean that I was a dyk3; theBwerd would imply that I am a box monster, theCwerd would detail that I am a carpet muncher, theVwerd would explain that I am a vagina lover, etc. Yes, all variations of this username would point no other truth than I am, in fact, a lesbian. Similarly, the username brian_eggleston proves that my opponent clearly has a fascination with a man who goes by this name, thus proving that he is in fact a homosexual (because Pro's a male. .. and besides, he admits this identity in his rebuttal). Because of this, I would find it highly disrespectful to not only my opponent's wife, but to (all of) his gay lover(s) for my alleged girlfriend and I to join him on his supposed yacht - a. k. a. mini sailboat - as no gay men have the brains or balls to make enough money to afford a yacht (they're all out getting HIV, at least that's what I've heard from fellow debaters like Solarman *shrugs*). Further, truth be told I don't even HAVE a girlfriend. .. As a raging lesbian, I have been known to reject things like wearing deoderant, wearing women's clothing, and especially shaving. .. anywhere. Thus it's been really hard for me to get a date lately - even the dyk3 loving femmes won't bite - but I acknowledge that with my good looks and big b. .. rains my opponent would probably abadon homosexuality for me (at least for the night). This is only another reason to politely decline his bedroom invitation, as I want no part in the gay drama that will inevitably ensue. Anyway, my opponent concludes his round by pointing out that because he felt chastised by me, he has refrained from using any sexist language, and thus his freedom of expression has been supressed and you should vote Pro. NONSENSE! Let me remind everybody of my opponent's orientation. .. G A Y. .. meaning he has no ba. .. ckbone. This concludes that regardless of my speech, he would have felt scared, timid or "chastised" like a little school girl, despite what I said and/or how nice I said it. Therefore my gender and my speech have nothing to do with my oppponent's feelings, so you should disregard his request. Further, even if what Pro said was true, his choosing to "supress his freedom" was of no fault of mine -- I didn't say or do anything, INCLUDING accuse of him being sexist, so his reasoning for not saying certain things have nothing to do with my tone. And finally on this point, Pro notes that he has refrained from using sexist language specifically, meaning that what was supposedly supressed actually WAS sexist, and would have been sexist regardless of whether or not anyone has accused him of anything. Therefore what he has said in his last round actually translates to the fact that people should be allowed to say sexist things without being accused of sexism. Not only does that make little logical sense (so people should be allowed to eat ice cream, but we're not allowed to call people out on the fact that they eat ice cream. .. ? ), but it also does not comply with the resolution. Finally, I would like to point out that I still firmly oppose the topic at hand. If Pro wants the freedom to express his homosexuality by painting himself in all-rainbow colors while wearing nothing but a kid size speedo and parading through Walt Disney World, I believe that I should be able to call him sexist, amongst other things (my accusations don't have to be true) to stop that heinous display. I also believe that should my opponent do the gay thing and go back to beauty school (to gain redemption for that hideous and 80s haircut he so proudly presents in his avatar), and he were to meet a nice, less attractive and more hairy gentleman that Pro could finally settle down with, and thus he posts a picture of them 2 on their out-n-proud honeymoon naked and intertwined, that I should be able to accuse Pro of sexism - or anything else - if that were to convince him to limit his so-called freedom and take the picture down.