Progressives are a danger to the United States, freedom, and liberty.

The strain between people of differing political views has been raised to a head like a festering pimple, and some are left wondering if its about to pop. How did we get to this point? Who really has our best interests in mind? Can anyone save America, or is improving America even the real goal? I will attempt to shed light into a current danger facing our society, and, with logic in hand, hope to navigate a plethora of unfortunate ideas, which has created such a divide in this nation. The first step to fixing a problem, is to recognize there is one, and regaining our unity as an American people, may very literally become impossible for failure to address certain harmful methods, enemies of our great nation will use against us. In our current state, nearly half the population sees the other half as a threat to their vision for the country, and through this division, we have achieved a newfound level of discord, which not only weakens our faith in each other, but opens us to very real external threats. We have become a nation weakened from the inside, and until we are able to recognize the cause of our cancer, we will not be able to move forward together. Its my hope that through debate, leftist ideals will be exposed, and through that truth, unity can begin, as unity of individuals is at times, the only way to ensure a healthy nation. I will hold to it, that modern progressive ideals are, in fact intentionally damaging to America, and originally stem from German left wing cultural Marxism, as described in the book, "The Devils Pleasure Palace, The Cult of Critical Theory and the Subversion of the West", by Michael Walsh. Furthermore, that these ideals once seated in parts of our government, are used as we speak, to launch attacks on family, sexes, our economy, racial equality, faith, and anything else which can divide us as a people. Additionally, Globalist interests, have seized advantage of this weakness in our leadership using donations. Through Mass scale funding of grass roots movements, as well as donations to media outlets such as CNN, the New York times, and others. We see the results of these tactics played out around us in the form of speech control, as perpetuated by political correctness, and the lefts creation of ideas such as, white privilege, micro-aggression's, and third wave feminism. Healthy psychology, as described by Johnathan Heights, (Professor of Phychology, NYU) should not be to teach people to focus on small, or incidental slights, such as micro aggression's, but rather, teaches, if you have a chain of thoughts that makes you depressed, the psychologist recommends breaking those chains of thoughts, and determine rather that person meant to offend you. Think, if its something worth getting upset about, like a rational adult. The purpose of bad psychology, such as microaggressions, is actually to train students minds to focus on those aggression's, and relabel the person as an aggressor in their mind. This type of idea spread through society, will have its obvious results, of creating division, while breeding a mentality that concedes that the more they are offended, the more they can be compensated. Individually, these things may seem unconnected in day to day life, a news story about four people beating a mentally handicapped defenseless man in Chicago, simply because he was white, seemingly has no correlation to the racial issues at the University of Missouri. Just as the push for the veting of massive numbers of Muslim refugees seems to have no correlation to illegal immigration policy concerning our southern border. Until that is, you look at the funding. But why would rich globalists control hundreds and hundreds of grass roots organizations here in America? Here is a massive list of just some of the organizations funded by George Soros here in our country. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org... Notice, every single one is based around some bias liberal ideal currently being pushed by mainstream media such as CNN. In which any dissenters are aggressed against, often being immediately framed as being racist, misogynist, or otherwise defaming term, simply for being in disagreement concerning policy, even that which concerns the national safety of citizens. Through progressive leadership we have empowered a child support system, which is legally allowed to garnish 65% of a mans wages, remove his rights to travel upon the very roads he pays taxes on, and even imprison him, for being late on his child support, while women win 94% of all family court cases in the nation, and are incentivized as single mothers with housing and food assistance, as well as schooling, and legal assistance. In an environment where men are castrated as providers, and women are gifted by the state, we develop problems. Problems like 72% of black households in America being fatherless. Interestingly enough, according to Texas Department of Corrections 1992 assessment of prisoners, 85% of all youths sitting in prisons were from fatherless homes. And According to the Center for Disease Control, 85% of all children which exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. Where do the policies governing these corrupt systems originate from? People like Hillary Clinton, considered by her followers to be a champion when it comes to fighting for women"s rights. Indeed, this is one area where no one can really doubt her authenticity. And then again, we see a woman who received her political ideals from Saul Alkinsky, a teacher of the left wing cultural Marxism described earlier, and auhor of the 1971 Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. And yet again, we also see funding fromt he man, George Soros, in the form of a 25 million dollar donation to the Clinton foundation. At this point, I think it would be a nonpoint to ask why. Why would a multi billionaire who broke the bank of England, and established political coups in several countries via similar grass roots organizations, while using his money to crash their economies, including Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, and Russia.. why would he care about the United States. We already know, hes written books about it. For instance, In his book, "Soros on Soros," he says: "I do not accept the rules imposed by others.... And in periods of regime change, the normal rules don't apply." Also "The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States," he wrote in The Age of Fallibility: Consequences of the War on Terror. This man, who openly writes about his disdane for America and funds over 3/4 of the pro Muslim agenda groups in the USA, is the same man who, along with Saudi Arabia, donated well over 25 million dollars to the Clinton foundation, Clinton, being a key player of the current administrations actions in the middle east and Syria, which led to the creation of terrorist groups such as Isis, which spread to 30 countries, and destabilized the middle east, leading to the current refugee crisis, which his dollars support. Progressives are brain washed by these gloablaist funded grass roots organizations to to believe in concepts such as global warming. A subject which grabbed the hearts of Americans by storm when they saw Al Gores Ice samples, which correlated a now debunked conclusion of the relationship of Co2 in the atmosphere, to the warming of the earth. Attempting to pass a carbon tax onto the citizens forcing them to pay for their "carbon footprint" When it was later concluded that the increase in Co2 followed an increase in the earths temperature, rather than preceding it, due to the oceans slow warming, and frothing up more gas, they simply kept with the movement, as it had created such a following, and was identified as an effective emotional tool to use against the people. Despite multiple measurement problems trying to prove global warming, the idea was clung to having to change its buzzword from global warming, to climate change, as the temperature of the earth was found to have actually been dropping. Is it any wonder there are so many conflicting reports on the causes of climate change, when all scientific research is funded by a government, who refuses funding and blackballs scientists with differing opinions, despite compelling research to the contrary? In other words, if I want to be paid as a scientist, and I have to conduct research supporting their theories to receive pay, because of the aggression towards other viewpoints, then what am I going to do? People who dont follow the mainstream viewpoints on global warming are accused of not caring about the planet, and otherwise demonized. And still, despite all this, there has never been a study done to my knowledge which states exactly how much Co2 would be damaging to the earth. According to studies, at times the earth has had much higher levels of Co2, as the planet naturally enters phases which are hotter or cooler long before the invent of modern agriculture, or industry. The ultimate realization being, that even if we could pass American regulations for climate change, to make any difference, all major nations would also have to participate to a drastic level, once again, a movement which ultimate goal is the mental manipulation of its followers, into believing in the superiority of a Globalist controlled planet. Once again, fueled by many grass roots organizations owned by guess who, George Soros. Progressives also attempt to destroy free speech, accusing others of fake news, even as they pass Measures such as the recent "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act" In which google and fb will have their material sifted through by 3rd party organizations owned by Soros himself, to decide which information is credible, and which should be eliminated. Censorship at its finest, and risen from outrage that their evil deeds were exposed in alternative media sources, such as wiki links.