Circumcision doesn't prevent any disease or infection

Circumcision is not only about foreskin, it's also about consent. Removing healthy tissue from a person's body without his oral or written consent is a violation of fundamental medical ethical principles unless there's any medical necessity. WHO said that circumcision prevents HIV by 60%. Sorry, 60% means? They compared a nation's past and present HIV rates after practicing circumcision for a period of time. They found a 60% decrease in HIV rate. They said that circumcision prevents HIV up to 60%. What a stupid statement it is! Maybe HIV rate dropped for few other reasons like public awareness and increase of condom use. It has nothing to do with circumcision. If you want to test effectiveness of circumcision in HIV preventation, you have to compare HIV rates between circumcised and uncircumcised people. But WHO neither did that nor they are interested to do that. HIV virus can reach your blood either via an open cut or mucus membrane. Mucus membrane exists i mouth, eye, nose, urethra, vagaina etc. When you have sex with an infected girl, vagainal fluid get into your urethra, virus take entry via mucus membrane and you have to way to prevent it without a condom. Circumcision promoters say that foreskin traps vagainal fluid and it increases the risk of catching HIV. But they don't know that foreskin is not the easiest entry point for HIV virus. Foreskin has langerhans cells those produce langerin, a great natural antiseptic effective against any germ. Latest research shows that Langerin makes a trap to kill HIV 1 virus. Langerin has an effective and important role to prevent HIV infections and HIV virus can only infect a foreskin when there's a high viral load. So when you have a foreskin, you have the natural protection and it may help prevent HIV. Reference: Read the wikipedia article Foreskin and you will found a list of bunch of functions it have, including functions of langerin and necessary citations of informations. Once you are circumcised, you don't have the natural protection anymore and HIV virus will find it's easiest entry point- "Urethra". If you're circumcised, vagainal fluid directly get into your urethra during intercourse and you have no way to prevent it without a condom. And urethra is reportedly the easiest entry point for HIV and foreskin is relatively harder. A circumcised penis causes more friction during intercourse leading to open cuts and sometimes bleeding those are easier entry point for HIV virus. Several research done among US Navy, Millitary, Airforce professionals show that there's no difference in HIV rates between circumcised and uncircumcised population. This is they way to research and this is called a research. The research done by WHO doesn't make any sense. Several other research show that circumcision may increase the risk of HIV transmission in Africa. They interviewed many African males and many of them believe that they no longer need condom as long as they have been already circumcised. What? About penile cancer, it happens to 1 in every 100000 men. So it is surely out of any consideration. But let's disscuss about it. Stupid researchers made these stupid statement that circumcision help prevents penile cancer when done on infancy. Adult circumcision may increase the risk of penile cancer instead. These statements don't make any sense. They are saying it based on the statistics, where a statistics will not bring perfect result for such rear medical conditions. Penile cancer can happen for some other reasons like HPV infection, the virus responsible for cervix cancer. How can we say that foreskin is somehow related to penile cancer. The researchers don't have any logical point on it. Circumcision promoters replied that smegma produced by foreskin may cause inflamation and irritation that may trigger cancer. In past, it was thought that smegma is a direct reason of penile cancer, but now it is proven to be incorrect. Circumcision promoters said that the reason foreskin causes penile cancer is unclear. So this statement indicates that foreskin has nothing to do with penile cancer. Other factors like HPV infection can trigger it. About STI, including HPV, an uncircumcised man is no more likely to get STI or HPV as long as he has a natural protection by Langerin. About HPV, it spreads from skin to skin contact, even if you use condom you can still get it in the area not covered by condom. So it's a totally stupid statement that circumcision may prevent HPV. About UTI, its unusual and unlikely for a normal uncircumcised boy to get it in normal condition as he has natural protection. 70% of world population is uncircumcised and reportedly there's no difference in UTI rates among circumcised and uncircumcised. You may develop some bacterial infection only in warzone or remote areas where there's not much water for taking shower and critical weather for survibal. If for any reason in an uncommon case an uncut boy get bacterial infection it, can be treated easily.