God Loves You All

It has been a pleasure engaging in a mature conversation with my opponent. "Are you saying God should have brought you into existence through different parents" This is one of the reasons why I honestly don't want my personal life involved in this debate. The point that I was trying to convey, (I see that I have been misunderstood, perhaps due to my lack of explanation) if an Atheist was created or raised in a secular or Agnostic family, he deserves to burn because of that? He had little control of he's surroundings, so how is it justified that children deserve to burn due to the environment they have been raised in? "Were your parents abusive? Do you feel threatened by people in your surroundings if you believe God loves you? " I can understand what my opponent is trying to tell me. But I strongly object the fact that my opponent is implying that MY parents were being abusive. That is considered disrespectful in this debate. First of all, I never felt threatened. Making that sort of assumption, is quite unnecessary because you are implying my personal life. Second of all, if a child raised in an agnostic environment, how exactly will he come to the conclusion that god loves him? Even in that scenario, I fail to see how someone can feel threatened if they believe god loves them. My opponent has not provided any evidence stating that claim. "Sin makes us imperfect. If we are not remade, we will remain imperfect. " I may be mistaken, but it seems like you are implying that we are made imperfect, and due to the "sinning" environment, we deserve to be sent to hell? This is exactly what I was trying declare in my previous paragraph. How is it someones fault that even if they are made perfect, they deserve to be sent to hell because of the sinning environment of which they have little control over? "I know God loves you, and I know He is angry with you when you are standing firm denying Him. How do you think I know? I know He loves me" This is an another example why I object bringing personal experiences to the debate. There is no source declaring that god loves you. I would like to ask how do you know he loves you? Even if he does love you, based on the definition of love, you cannot know what another being thinks just because he loves you. Paragraph 7: I would like to apologize on my false source. I have no objection if sources are given to con. Although, to quote from the source "But this blame should probably be limited to the Jewish religious leaders, who had managed to keep some of their power by cooperating with the Romans. These leaders saw the crowds that gathered around Jesus, and they knew that many people were calling him the Messiah. " This means that the Jewish leaders feared Jesus, thus executing him. Furthermore to quote from the source "A compromise view is that both groups, Jewish leaders and Romans, played major roles. But unless new evidence is uncovered, there will probably always be disagreement about who should get the most blame. " This is implying that one of the group should get the blame of the reason for Jesus' execution. My opponent later states that I should find a new source. Perhaps Wikipedia, which states "Some scholars see little doubt that the reference to the execution of the "king of the Jews" is about the crucifixion of Jesus, while others place less value in the letter, given the possible ambiguity in the reference" This means that some scholars see little doubt about the fact that Jesus was called himself the King of Jews, and the reason for he's execution. I would like to point out, again I see how Christians believe that Jesus died for our sins. Yes, now including the Bible as a reference, I find no objection to that. But in Matthew 27:11 "Meanwhile Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews? " "You have said so," Jesus replied. " This means Jesus really did call himself the King of Jews, using the Bible as a reference. Stating that Jesus did die for our sins, I fail to see how one death is equivalent to an eternity in hell? "I tell you God loves you and you say he does not. God allows you to be skeptical because you are more than a monkey" Well, from your argument the idea of god sending you to hell because you spent 100 years of your life sinning, I fail to see how god shows constant affection for eternity in hell. That ends my round. I thank my opponent for making this debate, and I would appreciate that my opponent would not state that I am ignorant, and that my parents were abusive. I found that disrespectful. I apologize for my source, but it did state that either the Romans or they Jewish leaders are to blame. Thank you!