Gay Marriage

"Gay Marriage, lesbian Marriage, and same sex Marriage are all illegal." This is objectively false. Homosexual "marriage" was originally handled at the state level, with some states recognizing it and others not. Maryland was actually the first state to "ban" same-sex marriage by saying "Only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid in this State" Notice the wording in this statement. No one would be put in jail, fined, or otherwise preveneted from having a marriage ceremony or claiming to be married. The only difference is that same-sex marriages would not be recognized or promoted by the state. Traditional marriage was not even recognized by the government until 1913. Obviously, this didn't prevent people from having marriage ceremonies and claiming to be married. Your statement is also incorrect on a second level. In 2015, the US supreme court "legalized" gay marriage, forcing all states to then support and recognize it. "Second: gay or lesbian are accusation that have both civil and criminal implication." Not sure what your point is here. Gay and Lesbian are titles given to people who are attracted to the same sex; they aren't really accusations. "Separation of church and state is an unlabeled test held in the United States Constitution a legal test as it is not a religious test given to hold political office." What do you mean by unlabeled? Also, of course there is no relgious test to be a part of the government. What does that have to do with this debate? "A public religious test of intelligence publicly describes as law attaching themselves to long standing likelihood"s with plagiarism." Why are you bringing up religious tests, and what does plagiarism have to do with same-sex marriage? "Fourth: law is nothing more than a public test to support, or decline deception guiding impartial separation. " Laws aren't merely tests; they are enforcements of morality, designed to help society. Also, you will have to be way more clear than "decline deception guiding impartial separation." "As a winner and looser in court can only ever both agree that a separation as occur as a Unite State to them both no matter the outcome of verdict discovered by jury or trial." I assume here that you are back to talking about separation of church and state. Winner's and loser's in court can actually disagree, both about the outcome and the idea of separation of church and state. What is your point here? "This United States can then be set as standard between both counsel and judge in all case take before the United States judicial Constitutional separation." I honestly have no idea what you are trying to say here, so I can't really argue with it. "Fifth: Marriage, Binivir, UnosMulier, VirMulier and Civil Union are all a constitutional separation to support the general welfare on well-defined state a witness can see clear and legal as a unique United State." Yes, traditional marriage helps society, so it is promoted by goverment (although the government has failed at this). What do you mean by marriage is a constitutional separation? "Without exposure to unneeded consummations" What are you trying to say here? "Sixth: The Constitutional common defense to the General welfare describes marriage as a single United State that can be shared in its general witnessing to describe a union between a woman and man who are a citizen of any governing state or nation." What do you mean by single United State? If you mean marriage is a fundamental part of self-governance, I completely agree. This is why marriage is generally a good thing, however, same-sex marriages do not provide these same benefits. If you mean sharing as in we all get benefits from people who are married, I would also say this only applies for traditional marriage. Same-sex marriages do not give us the same benefits. "Who then by their own entrance alone, by fact create, starting, nurture, and introducing a new never seen citizen into a State, or Nation without need of crossing any state or international border. With no any outside assistance to reposition a living being." Again, creating new human beings, or reproduction is only an aspect of traditional marriages. Of course, same sex partners can adopt, but this usually results in psychological problems for the child. Forgive me for not understanding everything you are trying to say. I still haven't heard any argument for why same-sex "marriage" ought to be recognized by the state.