God most likely does NOT exist

lets jump right in! Argument 1 Rationality Alright, we agree that nothing can come from something. Good. Thus the question becomes two. If God exists, did He come into being? Second, is the universe eternal? Let's actually start with 2. The universe is not eternal. Before Einstein many held the believe that the universe was eternal. However Albert Einstein disproved this theory completely. he performed an experiment and observed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning. Thus the universe did have a beginning. What caused it? For every effect, there has to be a cause. That is where God comes in. let's move to question 1. God did not have a beginning. Jesus said "" . In order for every thing that has a beginning there had to be a cause that didn't have a beginning. It wasn't the universe, for it was the universe that was coming into existence, thus it had to be God. God is and always be. He is beyond time. He created it. It is hard for us to grasp that because we are finite. But God is eternal. By definition God is eternal. To be less than eternal would be not God. Argument 2 Morals Your argument goes like this. Religious people are worse. doesn't take a belief in God to acquire right and wrong (using the example of animals.) let's start with your first claim. 1) Religious people are the worse Now i have to admit you have to some degree a point in this. Yes, many horrible things have been done by religious people. I have three responses. The first is that alot of religious people that commit crimes are Muslims. I am not trying to say they are all bad or mean. Far from it i know some that are very nice and I respect them highly. But most religious people who have committed crime are Muslim. 9/11 for instance. So it isn't quite fair to compare Christians and Muslims. it's like mixing apples and oranges. The second is that yes some crimes in history are from Christians. But all the crimes committed by them are not to be attributed to God. For God said to "love thy enemy as thy self" and "pray for those who persecute you" clearly any fault is not found in the existence of God but in the sin of man. my third response is that more horrible crimes have been done by atheists than all other combined. How? Take a look at ancient Rome, Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany. Holocaust. If we were to tally the deaths that occurred by them it would triple if not more the number of deaths by Christians or all religious peoples. So basically this argument backfires. 2 second point does not require religion to acquire morals. Yes it does! I have two counters. First is that if you are an atheist everything is relative. There are NO absolutes. Why because what may see absolute to you may seem relative to me. It's a contradiction. You brought up the example of animals. Now you didn't bring any evidence for this. But even if they did do moral actions it is WHY they did moral actions. A car could stop a murder and thus commit a "moral" action but why did it do so? not for moral reasons thus it wasn't adhering to moral standards. It is the same with animals, even if they did moral actions, WHY? we don't know because no one has been well..... an animal so to speak. The second is that, truth, physics, good, evil, and morality are LAWS. What is the first thing we know about laws? they have a giver. In order to have a law there has to be a giver of that law! Is it nature? no because nature isn't what ought to be but what is. Thus it doesn't create laws about how humans ought to act. Was it society. Just act nice? no! because than it would be relative! And truth, honesty, good, evil, are NOT relative. Good is good, evil is evil. Argument 3 Meaning To be honest i really didn't get your point on this one. But without God as we have established there is no meaning. Nature does not give meaning because is what is. Not what should be ought to be. Only God can give meaning. Argument 4 Civilization Also you didn't respond to my fourth argument. Civilization is built on individual rights. Life, liberty, ect. There has to be a giver of the law in order for there to be a law. The universal law of value to human beings only comes with a giver to them. This argument still stands as unrefuted. Response 1 you kinda dropped this one to. God is omnipotent, basically just because God knows in advance doesn't get rid of free will. He simply knows what our free will will be. Response 2 Your argument states that God is never involved in earth's happenings. Wrong, God is actively involved in His creation. Take for example the most amazing display of this. The Cross. God sent His Son to die for us! For our sin! God is continually working on His creation. Your next argument was that He never ceases our sufferings. I have two responses. the first is that if we will not come to Him in faith and repentance, how is He to help us? He died to save. Yet we choose to not accept. How can we ever expect Him to help us if we will not accept His help! The second response is that often it is sometimes for our better good to let us go through sufferings. Sufferings will sometimes leave us broken and that is EXACTLY where God comes in. I can testify for that personally. We sometimes have to be broken in order to be made strong! Thank-you for your time and look forward for your responses!