Google needs to get off Youtube

im soooo sorry about the "flowing trough" its a public forum debate style. basically when somthing is not directely adressed or not to my satisfaction i say that, and so you have to recover from that. the point of the debate is basically for me to incriminate your case. i will stop that if you want though ;p thats also why i adress you as "my opponent" its the way i have to debate in tournaments. i promise that the only trait of narcisism/self righteousness i let off is masterbation. lol i will continue to refute each point in ordor my opponent brought it up. 1) so the idea is for google to leave ownership to inturn make youtube better, and my side is to keep google to make youtube better. i understand and correct me if im wrong in the next round. but google has made youtube hundreds of times better. and also made them alot more money. now that google puts on bigger events like the y.t.m.a (youtube music awards) and the rewind youtube 2013. they rake in money to in turn pay for youtubers like totalbuiscuit and angryjoeshow. handing back youtube would cause a drop in money, fireing employees, and much smaller versions of the events i mentioned earlier. but i will get into this again later. 2) googles usefulness is NOT debateable because all it did was add stuff. not take away. if you dont want to use it you dont have to. and it is absolutely part of what we are debating. if google drops youtube then we lose all of the tools like hashtaging and someone. as for the google intagration we seem to agree that its ok, even right (im assuming). but when clients dont like it, they change it. and google has made drastic changes because of user distaste. but they are trying to make somthing like facebook that is always there. google is new and scary, i get it, but this is how the internet has worked forever. somthing new comes and people just get used to it as the product matures. google getting of youtube is not how we fix it. and the reason they have intagration is so that users of other google apps can use youtube easily and startup and join the community. yes this makes money for them, but thats what companys are supposed to do. just cause things arent perfect now dosent mean they are screwing us over. to make money they have to keep us happy and subscribed. so no. they arent giving us the finger, they are trying to help as much as possible. them leaving would be detimental because those that we like: joe and total buisicuit, and shane dawson and joey graceffa would lose money. 3) i dont know why people wouldnt like google. they have the most popular browser: chrome, and they are the most popular search engine: google. the people who dislike google so much that they dont want to use youtube is a miniscule minority. its a dumb hypothetical to pull uneducated voters to my opponent's side. infact the opposite is true. google is so popular that it has added more members and added more users to the new and improved youtube. hey at least its not bing. to continue video respnses are back. they are in a slightly diferent format but raywilliamjohnson gets them for his podcast, runaway thoughts. and the comment section will have to be up to the voters. i just want to point out the new hashtags. the more organized reply system, the ability to turn off replying and likes and dislikes. and the new censorship. the censorship limits spam and hateful comments like never before. of course youtube comments will always be dirty but theere is a huge improvement that will only get better. opponents rebbutals: 1) my opponent stated:bob was not stopped by google. But he was. you can tell because if you post a bob comment it will be flagged and hidden for spam. google had to change their system to fit user's complaints, and in turn stop bob. so thats why the change was not immidiate. 2) now my opponent mis interpreted this argument, and that is my fault. i worded it poorly but this is still not googles fault, in fact giving it back to youtube, would be detrimental because they have less authority and money to fight off these companies trying to claim videos. but more importantly google is not to blame. it is the companies themselves that flag for copyright. google is a very liberal company and has tried their damnedest to be pure, humble, and NOT greedy since the company's foundation. they are not "stuffing their pockets". and google getting off youtube sure as hell won't help. and finally. i want to say that this is not because of google its a problem that video game producers who don't do things correctly face. smash games and pew die pie don't face this problem because they have their copyright legality down. joe and total biscuit are obviously doing something wrong. my final focus: my opponent has clarified the debate topic for me so i want to explain why google needs to stay, and why google is important to the website and the community. youtube is not free. the way you pay for youtube is by watching ads. so more views on videos= more money 1) money. google has money. google pays for the big events like the music award i mentioned earlier. this way more views pays for the company to pay for more events and a better more advanced youtube. so they can fix the problems my opponent had addressed. that way we can have more events like geek week and live shows. 2) google has publicity. google can rake in more members by using google+ integration. so people with a gmail or other google applications, have a easy way to join the youtube community and view videos. google has done wonders for youtube, in the event market and by patching and making youtube a better more fun experience. so i urge voters to vote in the con. because in the pro world; youtube is primitive and a smaller community with a lot less money to do fun stuff. while in the con world youtube is a place where users and creators can have fun and make everyone happy.