The Bible is an Inconsistent Document (II)

Mat 28:19 - Act 2:38 "what did you have for dinner?" "Burger, chips and a coke." "What did you have for dinner?" "BurgerKing." Inconsistent? I'll let the voters decide. ******************************************************************************** Joh 3:22 - Joh 4:2 This obviously IS a clarification. If anyone is baptized in the name of Jesus Christ then He has, in a sense baptized them. Verse two simply clarifies that He did not physically do so. "The president sent an extra 3000 men to Iraq today." Really? Personally? Or were they simply sent in his 'name'? RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** Mar 16:16 - Mat 12:37 At NO point does the word ALONE appear in either text. (1)to stay fit eat a varied diet. (2)To stay fit exercise regularly. Inconsistency or just equally valid advice? RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** Act 26:23 - 1 Kin 17:22 Raised to LIFE. Not raised back to the sinful, fallen nature but to REAL ETERNAL LIFE. You should really concede points like this where you are obviously wrong as it only makes you appear petty and hard nosed. RESOLVED. (both times) ********************************************************************************Jam 1:13 - Gen 22:1 We'll let the voting members decide what cuts and what does not shall we? Everything ever written or spoken is contextual, especially the Bible. God does not tempt us in the negative "go on, do some evil" but in the "show me what you have learned" sense. God tests, satan tempts. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** Deu 24:16 - Deu 5:9 You misunderstand. There were many Jews who broke the covenant with God, those God punished even to the 3rd and 4th generation. Those who kept the Law He did not. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** 2 Sam 24:9 - 1 Chr 21:5 Again, we'll let the voting members decide what is enough. Here you take two entirely different phrases and assume the same meaning, the exact OPPOSITE of how you have been arguing for every other verse! RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** ACT 1:18 - MAT 27:5-7 Now you are simply adding an omission. You are ascribing method where none is implied. The simple explanation already given amply explains this wording. RESOLVED. (already) ******************************************************************************** MAT 27:46,50 - LUK 23:46 - JOH 19:30 The last words that the hearer HEARD. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** Lev 25:1, 17 - Gen 25:27 - Lev 25:44 You do not decide which arguments fails and which do not. Please allow the voting members that privilege. Allow me to elaborate on the different natures of the Old Testament and the New. The former is a shadow of the latter. What happens physically in the first happens Spiritually in the second. We cannot know, or show mercy unless we understand what justice is first. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************* 2 Pet 2:7-8 - Gen 19:8 But God did NOT allow any such thing to happen to Lot's daughters. If the Bible taught or 'upheld' gang rape surely God would have allowed it to prove His point? RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** Psa 19:7 - Heb 8:7-8 But as the scripture I've already provided clearly shows, THE BIBLE clearly teaches that the law failed because of imperfect men. *Voters please note that my opponent has yet again resorted to arguing his own opinion rather than comparing the Bible with ITSELF. RESOLVED. (round1) ******************************************************************************** Psa 103:8 - Exo 34:6 - Jer 13:14 - Lam 3:43b - 1 Sam 15:2 - 1 Sam 6:19 Now you are simply imposing your own judgment on WHEN God should finally lose His temper. You are treating an absolute, objective Entity by your subjective standards of 'slow to anger' etc. RE~SOLVED! ******************************************************************************** Heb 13:20a - 2 The 3:16 - Rom 15:33 - Exo 15:3 - Psa 18:34 - Psa 144:1 Now you have switched from arguing whether the Bible is contradictory to arguing whether GOD is contradictory. The Bible could actually state 'God is contradictory' and in NO way be contradictory ITSELF. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** GE 6:4 - FACT But in your OPINION miraculous healings and seas parting and resurrections are contradictory to reality. They are not according to the BIBLE. *Voters please note that my opponent has abandoned the agreed arena of debate for his own opinion and conjecture. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** Gen 7:19 - FACT We are NOT arguing whether the Bible contradicts reality but whether it contradicts ITSELF. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** GEN 7:2 - GEN 7:8 - GEN 7:9 - FACT NO. If the Bible stated that the earths circumference were 4 miles and then 80s miles then THAT would be a contradiction within the agreed confines of this debate. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** LEV 11:6 - FACT No, it is not poop. Although it is expelled anally it is totally different from normal poop. They re-chew the food in just the same way, which end is unimportant, only that it is an unclean animal. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** GEN 3:14 - FACT It is both. Asking me to state 'which parts are which' is a cynical attempt to portray discernment as a haphazard affair, where as in reality the Bible is easily understood by children. RESOLVED. ******************************************************************************** GEN 1:29 - FACT AGAIN, I have already provided scripture to show that the Bible clearly teaches that the 'fall' effected all of creation, not just man. RESOLVED. (round 1) ******************************************************************************** Gen 7:6 - FACT "Before Biblical times" This statement typifies my opponents confusion over the parameters of the debate. How can there possibly be 'before Biblical times' if we are debating whether the Bible is consistent with itself? ******************************************************************************** My opponent relies on a 'superior attitude' rather than valid responses or reasoned debate. (when he understands the debate that is.) "The proposition on offer is that the Bible is an inconsistent document, historically, scientifically, and logically (with itself). " NOT with 'facts' NOT with your opinion. With ITSELF. I seriously do not see how you can recover from this fiasco. Negated.