God is the best explanation rather than Science

My opponent fails to understand the the Law of Thermodynamics. The Law of Thermodynamics states matter cannot be created or destroyed. However the Law encompasses several principles and can be state in several ways. The law of conservation of energy : This states that energy can be neither created nor destroyed. However, energy can change forms, and energy can flow from one place to another. The total energy of an isolated system does not change. http://en.wikipedia.org... My opponent also fails to understand the Laws of Momentum. According to the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum, all the planets should spin in the same direction. We know from observation of the planets in our Solar System that the planets Venus, Uranus and possibly Pluto spin in the opposite direction to the other six planets. In addition to that, there are 63 known moons of the planets. Of these moons, six spin in the opposite direction to the remaining 57. In our Solar System, three of the planets, Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune, have moons orbiting in both directions. Facts quoted from : "Astronomical Almanac for the year 1989" (Wash. DC U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989) p. E88. From the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum we can see that if our Solar System evolved spontaneously by a Big Bang, all the moons should orbit their planets in the same direction. - The only exception to this would be if they encountered a large mass, such as another planet. - However, this event should certainly have left a crater, which it would have been observed by astronomers. - Observations of our Solar System do NOT support the big Bang Theory. Difference of angular momentum of the Sun and the planets The Sun actually spins very much more slowly than the planets. This certainly does not support the Big Bang Theory, as explained in the following quotation: "This (Angular Momentum) would have caused the Sun to spin very rapidly. Actually, our Sun spins very slowly, while the planets move very rapidly around the Sun. In fact, although the Sun has over 99% of the mass of the solar system, it has only 2% of the angular momentum. This pattern is directly opposite to the pattern predicted for the nebular hypothesis." Quoted from Dr. H. Reeves "The Origin of the Solar System", in "The Origin of the Solar System", Dermott, S.F. Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York p. 9, 1978. Evolutionist cannot explain the angular momentum of the Solar System: "The ultimate origin of the solar system's angular momentum remains obscure." Quoted from solar system Evolutionist scientist, Dr. Stuart Ross Taylor, "Solar System Evolution, A New Perspective," Cambridge University Press, p. 53, 1992, Dr. Stuart Ross Taylor. My opponent also has lack of knowledge on Natural Selection. Natural Selection is a process that causes helpful traits (those that increase the chance of survival and reproduction) to become more common in a population and causes harmful traits to become more rare" (Ref: Futuyma, Douglas Evolution 2005 Bowler, Peter. Evolution: the hisotry of an idea) The Cambrian Explosion proves Natural Selection is wrong. "The Cambrian explosion or Cambrian radiation was the seemingly rapid appearance of most major groups of complex animals around 530 million years ago, as evidenced by the fossil record.This was accompanied by a major diversification of other organisms, including animals, phytoplankton, and calcimicrobes. Before about 580 million years ago, most organisms were simple, composed of individual cells occasionally organized into colonies. Over the following 70 or 80 million years the rate of evolution accelerated by an order of magnitude (as defined in terms of the extinction and origination rate of species and the diversity of life began to resemble today"s. The Cambrian explosion has generated extensive scientific debate. The seemingly rapid appearance of fossils in the "Primordial Strata" was noted as early as the mid 19th century and Charles Darwin saw it as one of the main objections that could be made against his theory of evolution by natural selection. http://www.genesispark.com... "Charles Darwin considered this sudden appearance of many animal groups with few or no antecedents to be the greatest single objection to his theory of evolution:" note there is little or no evidence in the preceeding geological strata of transitional fossils thus. http://en.wikipedia.org... "Darwin himself found the paucity of transitional species to be one of the greatest weaknesses of his theory:" http://en.wikipedia.org... ... s_theories Note : The 2nd round was opening arguments not rebuttals. My opponent failed to abide by these rules.