Evolution is false

"evolution say's a fish can turn into a monkey" "Evolution says a monkey can turn into a fish" "evolution says a rock Turned into a Fish witch has sex with a Monkey in a Mud Pool that was struck by lighting and then the fish grew legs and walked and gave birth to a Human" Can you please provide the sources for this? I am not aware of any research into evolutionary biology which has suggested any of these things. --- "Evolution is false is because Evolution say's a fish can turn into a monkey but a fish dose not have the voice of a monkey" This is a highly flawed statement, but I am going to go on the assumption that the two examples of species (monkey and fish) were in fact intended to be so far removed from one another so as to present the ridiculousness you percieve in evolution. I shall, however, adapt your argument slightly just to make it slightly more coherent and slightly less flawed. First, I will replace 'monkey' and 'fish' to 'Species A' and 'Species B' So, now the argument is: "Evolution is false is because Evolution say's Species A can turn into Species B but Species A dose not have the voice of Species B" Second, I will replace 'dose not have the voice of' with 'does not have all the same traits as' So, now the argument is: "Evolution is false is because Evolution say's Species A can turn into Species B but Species A does not have all the same traits as Species B" Third, I will replace 'Evolution say's' with 'according to the theory of evolution' So, now the argument is: "Evolution is false is because according to the theory of evolution Species A can turn into Species B but Species A does not have all the same traits as Species B" Fourth, I will move 'Evolution is false' to the end of the argument, and make it 'therefore evolution is false'. So, now the argument is: "is because according to the theory of evolution Species A can turn into Species B but Species A does not have all the same traits as Species B therefore evolution is false " Fifth, I will remove extraneous words and add in some punctuation. So, now the argument is: "According to the theory of evolution, Species A can turn into Species B. However Species A does not have all the same traits as Species B. Therefore evolution is false " Sixth, since all the evidence points towards macro and micro evolution as the reason for diversity, I will replace 'However Species A does not have all the same traits as Species B.' with 'However evolution occurs.' So, now the argument is: "According to the theory of evolution, Species A can turn into Species B. However evolution occurs. Therefore evolution is false " Seventh, since 'According to the theory of evolution, Species A can turn into Species B.' is pretty much a basic (if unsatisfactorily simplified) definition of the theory of biological evolution, I will remove it (as it is assumed that the two of us have a rudimentary understanding of the concept we are defending/rejecting). So, now the argument is: "However evolution occurs. Therefore evolution is false." Eighth, I will remove the 'however' at the start, as it is extraneous at this point. What we are left with is a simplified, more coherent, and less specific version of your argument. This is basically what you are saying: Evolution occurs. Therefore evolution is false. --- By the way, sea monkeys exist: http://en.wikipedia.org... Your move...