A system of true Capitalism is the most beneficial system for the world

Now I will be moving on to defense of arguments." he still hasn't made even a single drop in the bucket of his burden of proof" Really now? Have I not. Up until this point I have 4 times the sources you have. The sources I provide are from credible authors. Your sources don't even back up the claims you make. If anything I have provided my side of the burdon of proof and you have failed to do so."he has not described any alternatives to capitalism" 1. I don't have to. If I can prove true capitalism is very bad for the world then I should win this debate. The resolution contains no requirment of an alternative.2. This isn't even true. In my seccond contention I talk about the alternative to true Capitalism of high government regulation and control. I have proved this alternative avoids the reasons I give of why Capitalism are bad for the world. " Con has failed to fulfill his BoP at all, whereas I have at least provided a topical argument"You did the exact same thing I did. You just listed off some good things about Capitalism. If my argument isn't topical, then neither is yours."that capitalism is theoretically perfect (a claim validated with empirical evidence)"Really? Where's your evidence. No evidence that you offered proves or even supports that Capitalism is theoretically perfect. Anyways, as I stated before how great something is in theory holds no weight in the discussion of reality. Let's take communism. On paper, it's a great idea. In theory it's perfect, but is it a perfect idea? No, it's far from it.Contention 1: Unsustainable "Pro argues that because capitalism results in economic growth, the economy will eventually outgrow the carrying capacity of the planet and the world will end"That's a very small part of my argumnt, but ok. "However, this is a non-unique objection, as it can be applied to any economic system. "Not nessasarily. Sustainable development is a huge possibility, however it is impossible with no government intervention meaning sustainable development under Capitalism is impossible. I went more in depth with this on Round 2."No matter what the system, population growth is inevitable, and with that naturally comes economic expansion. As long as there is a finite amount of resources in existence, *all* systems are "unsustainable"."However, due to the nature and practices of Capitalism the system is far more enviornmentally unsustainable than any other economic system. Contention 2: Enviornment"I agree that, left unregulated, the activities of corporations will destroy the environment."Then why do you support Capitalism? In the system of true capitalism there is absolutely minimal governement intervention. Under true capitalism this will just become an ever increasing problem."However, note that the definition of capitalism does allow for some very minimal government intervention in order to protect people's rights. "Ok there's a few key conepts here. "Minimal" and "In order to protect people's rigths" Minimal government intervention is nowhere near enough to mitigate or stop the problem of enviornmental destruction caused by Capitalism.And, once these problems get to the point where these regulations are protecting people the problem has simply gone too damn far. Not to mention by that point in time we likely will be past the point of no return.Contention 3: War The sources Pro provides do not back up his claims that Capitalism reduces war. The first source he provides is just a general overview of Capitalism. The seccond source you provide is stating that the domestic costs of war exceed the military costs.On the otherhand my claims are backed up by reliable sources while Pro has failed to back up any of his claims with evidence so far. Contention 4: Cap is immoral Ok I will admit that I worded the contention badly, however if you actually read my arguments in this contention I talk about how Capitalism negatively affects the people that live inside the system of Capitalism. That still counts as reasons why Capitalism is bad for the world in general. "none of his bold claims in this section have sources supporting them" I honestly wonder if you actually read the sources I gave because they do in fact back up my claims. The one person who's evidence doesn't back up their claims here is you.