TELANGANA State Formation

- Thank you for the arguments and examples. It seems that my opponent has completely abandoned the debate about why he/she is a Pro ( Sources: 1. http://dictionary.reference.com... 2. http://www.debate.org...) for the topic being debated. Argument From Above: My opponent has so far based his argument off of what has happened in the past. This is very wrong. It is like saying that since the United States voted Republican last time that there will be a Republican voted next time. - My contender's example (..even though i like it ) is quite misleading. A better example would be, what are the chances of a 5' / 100lb guy being drafted to play in NFL in 2010 ? With no offense, I would agree with most people in saying that it is 0% (...you are free to quote a %, but, I feel that it would still be negligible). I seriously would think that it is a BIG Miracle if it can happen in my lifetime. - My opponent seems to assume that past actions does not impact future reactions. Looking into the history of United States elections, it is not wrong to assume that "If the United States voted Republican last time & if they did a terrific job at serving thier country & people,and got them out of recession, boost the economy, increase employment, strengthened US$ value, etc, then, there will be a Republican voted next time as well" (..Rarely a fruit may fall far off from the tree..something like, if people's sentiments change on the Republican Party President Elect). My Opponent has also said, "However, arguing that 'it wont be that way in the future' has no Solid Proof." No where in my argument did I say that it won't be. I am not trying to prove that. My argument is that you have no proof that it will be, thereby negating your resolution. - My contender has abandoned the rules of this debate. Reminder: Contender has accepted the terms as "Pro" You should remember to check the websites that you are using as a source. As of this moment you have still failed to provide any real proof. - So far the Contender has never came up with any information in favor of 'Telangana State Formation' and continues to not do so. Quoting other websites is not necessarily the solution to the debate at hand. The debate is about the events that did not happen yet, but, the statements that have been made are based on past events that already happened in the same scenarios and predictions are being drawn here. Even with all the things that you listed, you are still not 100% sure that if Telangana State forms its government will want to hook up with Hyderabad region & Andhra State to survive politically and financially. - There is no 100% surety that a person will live the next second of his life, because death can strike any second. But, we still 100% expect that we'll live the next second of the life. So, there are no 100% guarantee for anything. All I am saying is based on the history of states like Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, even 'Telangana State' if formed, will more than than not fall into the rabbit hole. - Looking into recent India History would reveal that, the breaking up of states did not help. The events I felt will happen are a result of information available online and offline. Here are examples of the kind of events that lead to a decision for more dependency on other states/center for Financial & Political Governance/Stability: http://www.telegraphindia.com... http://economictimes.indiatimes.com... http://www.business-standard.com... - I wish you do the research as well and provide your comments on why you are "Pro" for the topic being discussed, since your role here is a "debater" as well. - The burden needs to be shared in a debate by both the contenders. You are not only to challenge, but also need to provide arguments & proof as well per accepted terms of a debate, why you are Pro / In Fovor Sources: http://dictionary.reference.com... Looking forward ( I hope my Opponent has much to say this time) to your proofs as well.