Apple [iOS] vs Android (Apple Pro, Android Con)

I would also like to apologize for my late response. Circumstances as they were, I was attending an actual debate tournament this weekend and was not able to access the Internet to see if my opponent had responded. Now he has, and I'd be delighted to see how this turns out. However, I would like to point out that a few of his sections do not relate to this debate, and I will explain the reasoning as I get to those sections. Furthermore, I would like to point out that my opponent did not attack any of the points that I brought up, nor did he refute any of the reasons I provided as to why iOS is superior to Android operating systems. Having laid my background in the previous round, I would like to begin by attacking each of my opponent's sections. Section 1: Forcing quit is different across different levels of Android operating systems. Potentially, one could force quit more quickly with an iOS system depending on how fast they can double tap the home button and swipe up. Forcing quit is relatively easy on both operating systems, so I don't see the grounds of this argument. Uninstalling an app is also just as easy on and iOS device as an Android device. "Long pressing" as my opponent says, is virtually the same concept as holding the home button on a Samsung device to force quit an app. My opponent makes the indirect claim that iOS users must have Google Chrome to search for and download apps. This is false. Users find their applications through the App Store by default, not through Google Chrome. Most people agree that Google Chrome is one of the best operating systems there is, and because many Android devices are owned by Google, a partnership has formed between the two. This results in Google Chrome coming by default to most Android devices. On the other hand, Apple does not have that relationship. iOS designed to run Safari, which it does relatively seamlessly. Section 2: While widgets are useful in some cases, they do not fit the compact iOS initial design. iOS wasn't designed to support them, and probably won't in the future. Personally, I believe that widgets are of less importance than apps, and Apple has realized this. Therefore, apps have been their primary focus to perfect. Section 3: I don't see how Apple's apps are any more "bunched up" than an Android device. Especially with the releases of the iPhone 6 and 6+, iOS apps aren't very close together at all. Also, my opponent says that you have to "search through a bunch of different pages for the apps that you want. " I get the impression that my opponent has never swiped down in the middle of a page on an iOS device. This instantly opens a very useful search engine to search the phone for not only apps, but a host of other useful things as well. Plus, it is possible to reorder the apps on both operating systems to move one's most commonly used apps to the first page. Section 4: My opponent is most likely referring to the introduction of Apple Maps in concurrency to the iPhone 5. Apple was then attempting to introduce something of competition to Google Maps. It was failure, and they reverted back to their original map app, Google Maps. Android uses this same map application, and because of this, there is no reason to debate it. Section 5: While my opponent is correct in that Samsung and LG have introduced ways to use two apps simultaneously, this system has not been perfected. I have used this option before, and was displeased with my results. Functionality is greatly reduced, especially on smaller devices. iOS doesn't have this ability, and I hope more precise technology is innovated before they do to ensure a good user experience that wasn't found with LG or Samsung. Section 6: Different profiles can easily become confusing, especially if not explicitly customized. It isn't fun to be changing settings and downloading apps for awhile only to realize you were logged in to the wrong account. Furthermore, even though it doesn't necessarily pertain directly to this debate, I would like to point out that Android doesn't have an operating system compatible with computers. Google has Chrome OS, but that is far lacking when compared to Yosemite, or virtually any other Apple operating system for computers. Section 7: My opponent does not specify what "chip things" are, yet I will assume he is referring to Apple Pay. Every new innovation has its flaws, just as Apple Pay. It has not yet been perfected, but Apple plans on continuing research to improve this beta version. Furthermore, Apple Pay isn't exactly a part of the operating system and does not really pertain to this debate. Section 8: My opponent is likely referring to the required storage space to upgrade to iOS 8 from other versions. I would like to talk about that for a little bit. Many people complain (as my opponent has) about required storage space to install the upgrade. There is an extremely easy solution to that problem. It is also a recommended as an important way to back up files on all devices. It's called iCloud. Individuals can store all of their information in the cloud and free up space on their device. Furthermore, my opponent mentions that Apple only has 5.8 GB of free space. Once again, that is false. 5.8 GB is the amount of free space required to upgrade to iOS 8. In terms of free space, iOS can have over 64 GB with more storage once again on iCloud. Section 9 Argument: "Android offers many different ways to protect the contents of your phone. Pins and shape tracing is just a couple of examples. IOS only has pin numbers, fingerprint scanning, and swiping. " Attack: In this argument, I feel my opponent made a mistake of even bringing it up. While a few more options might be available with Android, iOS has the advantage here. Fingerprint scanning is some of the most cutting edge modern technology implemented as security for phones and tablets. It's completely personalized and secure and is superior to Android's only competitor to fingerprint identification, Face ID. Face ID can get confused if the individual has a different hairstyle and isn't as accurate. Section 10: My opponent's first sentence in this argument is a wreck. "Reliable" and "breaking" are an oxymoron, and his accusation is false. "iOS" doesn't break. iOS is an operating system, therefore it cannot shatter or break by dropping it. Furthermore, as specified in the first round, this debate is about operating systems, not about bodystyle and build of devices. With that in mind, this argument does not relate to this debate and is irrelevant. As my opponent has stated, we can agree on one weakness that exists within both operating systems, they don't handle water in the circuit board very well. No arguments were made against my case in the first round, so I have nothing further to add to this round of the debate. Once again, I thank my opponent for allowing me the privilege to debate this topic and wish the best of luck. Thank you for your time. :)