We should cut all funding to NASA

I realize he may believe everything NASA tells or shows him, but most of society today does also. My opponent has been shown that conspiracies exist, or at least one, and admits that governments conspire at least this much. . http://www.debate.org... It is my aim to show to my opponent, and our voters that we as humans live on a flat plane (whether finite or infinite remains to be seen) inside an enclosed system, or under an impenetrable dome. This is perhaps the biggest conspiracy of all, and in turn should show that NASA is a fraud, space is entirely fabricated, and there is no need for "space exploration" as we know it. I noticed, from his past debates, that my opponent is in search of evidence of claims, and I hope to appease him with such evidence, starting with flat earth evidence, both empirical and logical, and ending with an impenetrable dome. Flat earth evidence 1. Distances sighted A "mirage" was photographed from Michigan overlooking Lake Michigan of the Chicago skyline, a span of 60 miles, which should be 2,400 ft below the supposed curvature of the earth. When we look at the heights of the buildings in Chicago, we find that The tallest building at 1,450 ft is the Sears tower. We should not be able to see ANY of Chicago from Michigan. Now before you go agreeing with the whole bs mirage thing, think to yourself what an actual mirage looks like, always inverted, mirrored, partially opaque, and generally distorted, Google some images of actual mirages. Conditions are perfect indeed. This is not a mirage. There are many instances of long distances being seen, and this is something that anyone can confirm, and is empirical evidence of a flat earth. . https://youtu.be... 2. No movement detected Albert Einstein said: ". .. I have come to believe that the motion of the Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment. .. The supposed movements of the earth has never been detected. How can the world be a ball flying through space, spinning, wobbling, etc if we can't measure it's movements? Arguments for a dome. 1. Stars through a telephoto lens The Nikon P900 is arguably the best telephoto camera for it's price. This has led more people to obtain these cameras, and capture things from a distance like never before, namely stars and planets. These videos were taken from such a camera, and show a very peculiar sight. . https://youtu.be... This doesn't look like a ball of fire, millions of miles away? Here's another: . https://youtu.be... There are several videos of stars up close that anyone can see, and anyone with a few hundred bucks can produce these same results. Compare this footage with this: . https://youtu.be... 2. The go fast rocket This rocket, launched from the Nevada Black Rock desert. It broke some records for being the highest, and fastest amateur rocket ever launched. A couple things I'd like to point out are outlined below: a. The rocket had enough velocity to reach a much further height, but it makes an abrupt stop, then slowly begins to turn and descend, as if it were suspended in a dense liquid. b. The sound that comes from the separation distinctly sounds like it happened underwater. Space has no sound, because there are no molecules for the sound waves to travel through. c. This point goes with my flat earth evidence. At it's peak, the camera catches a glimpse of a smaller, yet familiar face. .. . The moon. How, if the moon is 250,000 miles away from earth, can it shrink to this size? It's a lot closer than we are told, and only travels far enough away from us so that we can't see it anymore. Same with the sun. Conclusion Evidence overwhelmingly supports a flat, enclosed earth. I have plenty nor evidence of this, but I'd like to hear from my opponent at this time on the matter. Nothing NASA is showing us is truth, they get billions of taxpayer dollars for showing us computer graphics images. I propose we not only cut funding to 0%, but demand the money that is sunk into this massive black hole in the past.