High probability of God or Gods existence

First of all, the world by its intervals of existence is generally a line of things as portrayed by the argument. Within the bounds of our universe, one thing relies on the previous thing to exist; that is one of the premises: a rule of the space-time-matter universe. But as I said, if this were entirely consistent, there would be no beginning, and therefore our processes of change in the triune universe will not exist, and therefore the matter of the triune universe will not exist (that includes us). The 5-step premise brings this idea with a beginning that lies beyond the triune universe. The 5th premise: 5. Therefore, what it takes for the universe to exist must transcend both space and time. In the theistic view, God is what it takes. God therefore must transcend both space and time, in a way likely analogous to the Flatland theory. Because the laws of our universe do not necessarily apply to what transcends the laws the universe (by definition of transcending), Con"s POV is more of a guess on what sort of laws that transcending dimension carries. Therefore we can still expect to say that there is an infinite God. After all, God, by definition, created space, time, & matter. But even with Con"s rebuttal, an enforcer of beginnings and changes outside the universe is still undeniable under this logic, opposed to the agnostic alternative. Con stated "if God does exist outside the realm of space and time there would be no way for him to interact with the realm of space and time". This statement is fallacious. If I did say that, I will correct myself: God TRANSCENDS the realm of space & time. According to the Flatland theory, as three-dimensional beings we can construct in two-dimensions. The laws of a 2-dimensional world do not apply to us, because we have depth (and life). Yet we can control a two-dimensional world, by drawing, erasing, coloring, etc. God does the same to the universe. He stands in all the dimensions there are, and percieves ours. He is able to interact with space, time, and matter and change the features of the universe at will. If you read Flatland, the logic is this: we have a 2D world. The people in this world see things in only 2 Dimensions. We are 3D, gods to these people. If we stuck a finger into the 2D plane, all they can see is a circular outline that our finger is entering. This is analogous to the many ways God communicated with us (although a 3D world has much more detail) as of the Bible, if you believe that. But since we are just arguing his existence, I"m just making this as the theory of how God CAN interact with the realm of space & time. Now to the Bible. My opponent, referring to John 1:3, has said this: "if without him not anything that made that was made. Then something like plastic which does not exist before man or in nature must have also been made by him. Yet we all agree that it was made by man." My opponent has stated: If the bible is the word of god and he is omnipotent then it would be logical to conclude that none of the instances in the bible should be false or contradict one another. if God is omnipotent then mistakes would not exist. Therefore if mistakes or contradictions do exist, the bible is not the word of God, but the word of men. This would mean the first quote I stated("All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made."-john 1:3) is false for the bible was made by man not god. My opponent either has ignored the premises I have presented or has forgotten, that what it takes for something to exist also has to exist. The ingredients of plastic come from nature, which mankind uses in technology. This computer I am typing on was created by man. But in religion, man could not exist without God" therefore my computer could not exist without God. There is a chain of existence and it all goes "through God". This is a very vacuous argument against God"s existence. "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)" Foundation = the action of establishing an institution or organization on a permanent basis, especially with an endowment. Therefore, a cycle of movements is a foundation, since it relies on a consistent basis of mobility. The earth is fixed and immovable in relation to its orbit around the sun. Have you ever known the earth to "unfix" itself and "move" itself out of its orbit around the sun? It doesn't happen, because the earth is fixed and immovable in relation to its orbit around the sun. The earth also is fixed and immovable in relation to us. There has never been a single day in which we had no place to stand, b/c the earth unfixed itself and moved itself out from under our feet. The earth has always been fixed and immovable, both in relation to us and in relation to its orbit around the sun. In fact we"ve learned to take it for granted that the sun will shine during the day and that there will ground for us to stand on when we awake in the morning.