Evolution vs Creationism

Of course evolution is a theory, so is gravity, magnetic force fields, quantum mechanics etc. In fact, all science is theories. Science is a physical module, developed by mankind to understand the way of universe. It is the absolute truth, closest to the reality. Some parts of it proven wrong, eventually, but new modules are develop to replace the old ones. Why do you think, Scientist from different countries, different disciplines unanimously agree that evolution is a fact? In order to a theory to be accurate, it requires evidence, not fairy tales. Evolution isn't a random event. It is absurd to say evolution is random and you are basically expressing your lack of knowledge about the subject itself. It's an event that take place over billions of years with 'selective probability'. Evolution itself doesn't explain the origin of the first organism, but it explains how new species are arrived from pre-existing species, through gradual change with time. This theory supported by evidence directly contradict with teaching of old scripture like Bible or the Quran, because they point out that all living species was created individually by a supernatural force, which is even more improbable to begin with. Irrational to you doesn't mean it's irrational to everybody else. In fact it's not irrational at all. Yes, the theory is complex, isn't as easy as creationism. It requires a basic understanding of science. I think you are gravitating away from the main subject here, which is evolution, not Big Bang or the origin of Earth, But since you made a point there, I would like to give you an answer. Agree, the laws of thermodynamics state "energy cannot be created nor can it be destroyed" but that's only applicable to a closed system. Universe, isn't a closed system. Next time, if you are making a point, please quote the full statement or a law, don't just state a part of it to make your point. Even though evolution doesn't say anything about the origin of life itself, But again, since you have made a point, i'd like to answer it. Origin of life is well explained by Alexander Oparin's Biochemical origin of life. According to his theory, it explains how raw elements required to initiate life, were already available within earth's early environment, especially within primordial soup. Lipids, as they always does, form into little 'blobs' as you like to call them, these are now known as cell surface membranes. The origin of the first replicating nucleotide is unknown, but it is pretty obvious that it was formed in the same way the rest of the life molecules are formed. This self-replicating nucleotides are covered by the lipid membranes, and this gives rise to the earliest types of anaerobic cellular organisms. Although i've stated it briefly, I recommend you to read more about this, which will give you a full understanding about the theory of biochemical origin. So far your argument is directed toward evolution, which is one side of the argument. What evidence that you have to claim that creationism is the perfect explanation to origin of life? I must stress the point, that any literacy or scripture like the Bible or the Quran wouldn't testify solid proof evidence within scientific community. If you intend to, It is like claiming harry potter is real, by showing evidence from his book. If you don't mind, watch the attached video, which shows some evidence of evolution, from the fossil record http://www.youtube.com...