Jesus is the Father incarnate

Since Pro is making the affirmative claim that "Jesus is the Father incarnate", then it follows that the BOP lies solely on him. I. Pro needs to Prove God existsFirst and foremost, Pro is making the claim that Jesus is the Father incarnate. Who is this "Father"? Is is the Abrahamic God? Until Pro clarifies who exactly this "Father" is, I have no argument to rebut against. Pro is just making an unproven claim about a man being someone or something else. Until he can:A) State what this thing is that Jesus is supposedly the incarnate ofandB) Prove that whatever this thing Jesus is supposedly the incarnate of exists...there is nothing to rebut, as Pro is doing nothing more than making illogical claims. I can just as easily say "Jesus is not the Father incarnate" and it'd hold just as much weight because Pro has yet to prove his claim. So far, Pro has failed to maintain his BOP due to failing at providing evidence for such a claim. II. Responses to Questions posed by Pro1) Can an eternal God die? If not, how did the eternal Son die? If yes, how can an eternal God die?An "eternal" God cannot, in theory and by definition, die. The definition for eternal is: Lasting or existing forever; without end or beginning. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...If you mean "Jesus" when you say eternal Son, then I can say he died after being crucified on the cross. Romans 4:25 also states, "He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification." (NIV) http://biblehub.com...So it would be equally valid to say he literally died on the cross due to blood loss and dehydration, and died metaphorically for the sins of mankind as is taught in Christian literature.2) If the humanity of God the Son died, does His divinity die as well? If not, where was (or what happened to) His divinity while He was dead? If yes, how can divinity die?Humanity and Divinity are two different things. Humanity is defined as: 1. The human race; human beings collectively: 1.2 The fact or condition of being human; human nature. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...Divinity is defined as: The state or quality of being divine. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...Since we need to dig deeper, the definition for Divine is: Of, from, or like God or a god. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...Now, since Humanity has to do with the condition of being human, whereas Divinity has to do with the likeness of God, we can see a clear distinction start to rise between these two terms. It is not therefore logical to assume that one of these qualities is dependent on the other or vice versa since both qualities have to do with two completely different things. Pro needs to prove the divinity of the person in question. Until that is proven, there is no claim to rebut since it is nothing more than a baseless assumption. Since the divinity isn't proven yet, the question of whether the thing in question loses that which has yet to be proven holds no ground as it is an illogical question. In Conclusion, Pro has done nothing to support his BOP so far. All that has been made is baseless assertions which require proof before they can be taken on as valid claims. Pro needs to show what this "Father" is, pro then needs to prove that this thing exists, and lastly pro needs to show how this eternal son had divinity. Until these three challenges are met, Pro has done nothing for his side of this debate aside from posing mathematical problems which hold no ground whatsoever and questions which are in themselves illogical assumptions. I would ask Pro to fulfill his BOP by taking on these challenges that I've laid out. I now return the floor to Pro. Thank you.