Call of duty is better than battlefield

You have some good points there however if players are not very good in cod they can use the support kill streak system or other options which help team mates and it is not very hard if you choose this option. there are a few options of which package system or which kill streak system you want which gives you the free will of supporting your team or on the assault. Cod Ghosts have removed only few game modes however added some new ones which are more fun such as infected and hunted, these both are so much fun to play and has team work in it so cod can also have team work like battlefield. I know in most game modes and matches there is no team work but that doesn't necessarily mean thats bad. It gives gamers a challenge or free will of roaming and killing however they want. Perks are actually sort of popular and make things easier for the gamer and help him such as slight of hand reloads guns very fast so there can be no worries if an enemy comes past him. Besides battlefield 3 and 4 the others(battlefield 2/1) were not as popular however for cod even the old ones are very famous as a matter of fact cod 4 was the biggest leap of the franchise it redefined the FPS as all action blockbuster. Cod is also a bigger and hence better franchise than battlefield. besides battlefields overwhelmingly great graphics there are a lot of hackers in battlefield especially in battlefieldplay4free everyone complains in the comments. also in battlefield there is glitches especially in battlefieldplay4free and I admit both cod games and battlefield games can have lag. For cod infinity ward they have a twitter account which you can easily give complains to and the hackers are banned, its harder in battlefield and anyways cod has less hackers. Cod is more hardcore since you need skills to get kills, in battlefield you can shoot someone with a tank which is not hard. yes battlefield has more guns options which is good however battlefieldplay4free has only frag grenades not semtex while cod has the options of different variety of explosives as well. in some ways not being to realistic with the game is a lot of fun like a huge amount of gamers enjoy quick scoping which is not in battlefield which makes not being to realistic a factor of entertainment to much realism can spoil the game like suppose if your grenades can hurt team mates there will be trollers and people who kill you for fun. cod doesn't only have kids screaming in mikes or noobs battlefield has idiots and noobs as well, one example is in battlefieldplay4free I had placed a mine when I was going a team mate shot the mine and blew it I put one more mine again he shot it while I was there and I died. Cod is more addictive and you play it for hours long and have fun battlefield has addictiveness but not as much as cod as it lacks many game options, game modes and is too realistic and slow paced, cod is fast paced and makes you play many matches for very long. So as I said before Overall Cod beats Battlefield Overall including multiplayer, campaign, other types of game modes so cod is overall better having all the things it needs to provide the ultimate entertainment package as I said before.