Sincere belief in Leprechauns is equally rational to sincere belief in Gods.

To compare the belief in God/s to that of leprechauns by asserting that they are both equal simply because of the word belief is false. Short version: your arguments are riddled with terminology meant to discredit my arguments that refuses to acknowledge the error in the tenets of your arguments. a logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning,where is my flaw in reasoning? Why didn't you show one flaw I set forth or are you simply dismissing my arguments are the result of one in need of a mental institution, rather you have dismissed my counter claims,so you avoid addressing them under the pretext of flawed reasoning. Is it flawed because it offends you or because you are indifferent? Long version: I spent time comparing God/s and leprechauns because I needed to distinguish between the belief in God/s and that of leprechauns. I had to rationalize why one set of beliefs has a greater possibility of being acceptable than another. You would have me accept that both beliefs are the same,however clearly if you read my arguments you would conclude that faith is only required for one and not both and hence such differences affect the validity of any belief by your logic, those who subscribe to scientific theories and beliefs are in the same boat,like you said people make mistakes. And how can both be devoid of empirical evidence,you are erroneously attempting to set the parameters by (as so many people do) claiming that something must be scientifically proven to be accepted. How can we trust human hand when many a times they have been corrected? I presented the law of entropy as my evidence by deduction, you engaged in a logical fallacy by casually dismissing it and as such you expect me to present scientific finds as my argument but that onus is not upon me.is this about leprechauns and God/s are an image desire to discredit the belief in God/s? What poor evidence? What is your evidence for your beliefs that is error free? The emphasis on empherical evidence is it's self a logical fallacy. The justifications for the belief in God/s and leprechauns is not the same. I briefly gave a lay out of why but you keep insisting they are as such, by this logic those who hold evolution true, God/s and leprechauns are in the same boat. As all can be challenged,some based on empherical evidence for evolution I would argue that it contradicts the second law of thermodynamics, cambrian explosion among many other things as such your insistence on empherical evidence is your attempt to avoid the issue by making this an argument about the merits of belief as opposed to the differences in both beliefs. To people commit others souls to leprechauns in death? Not even the believers in leprechauns would do this. Why then do they deserve the same respect, are you implying that believing in a Creator is identical to belief in Bugs Bunny? If so, you are simply putting this forth to ridicule those who believe in God/s. I brought up religious texts to show that belief in God is backed up by text unlike that of leprechauns and that the moral message shows a level of intelligence at play and by that deduction one should conclude that belief in God is superior to belief in a non text non moral mythical being.the Bible says thou shall not kill, the quran equates killing one person to murdering the whole of mankind,is this the message you claim is not morally superior? Of course you judge based on your own standards but that is unfair as your standards are subject to cultural influences and biases let's look at atheist nations by definition,( are they morally superior? ) for instance China,Soviet Union,how many did Mao and Lenin kill? Are you saying Mao and Lenin are superior to Moses and Adam? .the claim that man can have moral superiority is an arrogant assertion as African Americans where enslaved, humiliated and killed in contradiction to religious text by apparently religious people hence it is men who commit gross evil not religion. It is simply a way evil men justify evil deeds not the other way around. What about mother Teresa? Was she motivated by faith or human logic? Will a non believer give up all his wealth to help the poor? Name one if you are truthful. You have lied when you say a lot of immorality and evil has been done in God/s name, this is simply a shallow way people use to find fault with religion and even the so called texts you refer to,many are known to have been corrupted by men. The point of this was to show the superiority of belief in God/s to that of leprechauns after all everything we see has a beginning and hence valid for this argument. I used Isaac Newton because of his accomplishments and as a man a science his belief in God should carry weight. His belief in alchemy (a scientific notion) is not the same S his belief in God(supernatural), are you saying that it's a Logical fallacy to use the statements of others? By that logic no empherical evidence can be deduced as it is done by "smart people".if smart people can also have wrong ideas and beliefs that list includes Darwin too. Back to the argument though, belief in leprechauns should not and can not be the same as belief in God/s. It is clear for anyone with clear and sound reasoning of course not the same if one has an agenda.