Obama is not a good president

First) A decision to go in and kill Osama was a big risk and it could have been a thoughtful decision, but there is no telling that. There is no way to say that the decision was fully thought out. For example, what would the American people think if we decided not to act on this lead. We would have been considered cowards by a lot of people and countries. Also even if it was thoroughly thought out Obama only deserves partial credit. Obama is not the only one that decides if they go in. In all actuality Obama hesitated about giving the go orders, and it was truly the CIA who advise Obama to give the orders. (1) Now if my opponent can first prove that this source is not trust worthy and secondly can find a trust worthy site that says that Obama did not hesitate and he CIA did not advise Obama to give the go orders, I will admit that he did give the go orders and drop this part of my argument. Second) I will agree with my opponent on the one fact that Afghanistan is their own country and that we can not stay there forever, but this still was a bad risk. The Taliban is still in force and we still have American casualties because of the Taliban. We should not pull out of Afghanistan until the Taliban is neutralized or at least suppressed to a controllable level. Now, don't get me wrong I believe that we should have eventually pulled out, but it is to soon. Also I think it is good that we are personally training their local force to defend their country. I believe it would have been better for this war gains the Taliban, which affects America, if we trained their force while we were still in Afghanistan. This would put double the force on the Taliban making it easier to suppress them. Us pulling out just gives the Taliban to take back control of Afghanistan and grow their forces stronger. Their stronger forces will pose a threat against America. Now, it is impossible to say that there is 0% chance of Afghanistan to defend against the Taliban, but it was not a risk we should have taken. Third) Yes, it is true that Obama did slightly increase our popularity with a lot of places. Now where did he gain our image, our allies. Our allies are not the most important thing to this country. We should have spent our time an money not on increasing our popularity with allies that have proven to be loyal, but with our enemies or neutral countries. With the Taliban increasing in power in the Middle East we should be increasing our image with the Middle East. If a war breaks out between America and the Taliban, what is important. Having our allies being 21% happier with us or having our enemies look at us 21% better. Allies will fight with us no matter how much they like us because most of them cannot compare with our force, politically it would be safer for them to fight with us than just be spectators. If a war did break our the Taliban will have more "land" that is controlled by them. If the Middle east does not like us then they will be willing to support the Taliban in destroying us. If we can become allies with the Middle East then the Taliban will have less "land" to control which means less money for weapons and less troops. Fourth) Now, back to the illegal voting. It is not proven that Obama's motives when he passed a law that did not require an ID to be present when you vote, were to allow illegals to vote(2). But, try to think of why he did it, where he did it, and what happened. First of all he passed this law in Arizona. Arizona is known for its large number of Mexicans. (3) This picture shows the number of illegals in 2010-2011 in Arizona. While it may not be the largest state with illegals but it is one of the highest. This is quite a coincidence. Now, lets look at what happened. First (4) this picture shows that his approval ratings were at a steady rate after December 2010, his approval stayed in the 40's. Now in this picture is shows Obama's Latino vote in 2008 (5). Now look at his Latino vote in 2012(6). This shows a significant increase in the approval ratings of Latinos toward Obama. This shows a pretty good motive for his reasoning, while it may or may not be true, but it is something to take into consideration. The last four are links to Google image pictures. The images in the background are not what they are about, so if there is anything offense if the back I would like to apologize in advance. Links 1) http://www.truthorfiction.com... 2) http://www.eastvalleytribune.com... 3) https://www.google.com... 4) https://www.google.com... 5) https://www.google.com... 6) https://www.google.com...