God existence.

First off Con seems to Ignore the question I asked him at the beginning of my post. Let's continue,but I hope Con will get to it on R2I don't see how this proves God. I believe this is argument from ignorance. Something unlikely? Must be God.No this is not an appeal to ignorance. Lets get into a little more detailThe laws of logic are conceptual by nature and absolute. Being absolute, they transcend space and time. They are not the properties of the physical universe (since they are conceptual) or of people (since people contradict each other, which would mean they weren't absolute).Thoughts reflect the mind A person's thoughts are the product of that person's mind. A mind that is irrational, will produce irrational thoughts. A mind that is rational, will produce rational thoughts. It seems fair to say that an absolutely perfect mind would produce perfect thoughts.Since the Logical Absolutes are transcendent, absolute, are perfectly consistent, and are independent of the universe, then it seems proper to say that they reflect a transcendent, absolute, perfect, and independent mind. We call this transcendent, absolute, perfect, and independent mind God since a physical brain is not transcendent by nature because it is limited to physical space, and God is, by definition, transcendent in nature. Unless of course Atheism can account for these laws of logic somehow without a transcendent,absolute,perfect and independent mind behind these thoughts.Not what atheism is about.It maybe true that atheism is not directly about accounting for existence,but if atheism does not have anything to give or can find to account for it the statement is true.No.Im sorry but....... Is this really a rebuttal? Just stating "No" has no empirical base to it.Energy can't be destoried.True energy cannot be destroyed yet it can be used up (entropy as I said)"The idea of heat death stems from the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy tends to increase in an isolated system. If the universe lasts for a sufficient time, it will asymptotically approach a state where all energy is evenly distributed."[1]"Thus, the fact that the entropy of the universe is steadily increasing, means that its total energy is becoming less useful: eventually, this will lead to the "heat death of the Universe"."[2]Scientists agree the universe had a beginning and is not eternal"Scientists generally agree that "the Big Bang" birthed the universe about 15 billion years ago." [3]"Many once believed that the universe had no beginning or end and was truly infinite. Through the inception of the Big Bang theory, however, no longer could the universe be considered infinite. The universe was forced to take on the properties of a finite phenomenon, possessing a history and a beginning."[4]"The universe cannot be infinitely large or infinitely old (it evolves in time)."[5]And what brought 'it' into existance? Something more powerful you say?You cannot have an infinite regression of causes (otherwise an infinity of time has been crossed which is impossible because an infinity cannot be crossed).Therefore, logically, there must be a single uncaused cause that did not come into existence.The answer is that by definition He is not created; He is eternal. He is the One who brought time, space, and matter into existence. Since the concept of causality deals with space, time, and matter, and since God is the one who brought space, time, and matter into existence, the concept of causality does not apply to God since it is something related to the reality of space, time, and matter. Since God is before space, time, and matter, the issue of causality does not apply to Him. Almost all of Pro's arguments are invaild and will ask for better ones.Saying they're invalid does not make it so, you must demonstrate whyThe rest of your round is a pot of fallacies. There is no need for me to rebut them.Again saying it does not make it so. Taking into account that the odds of Jesus fulfilling 48 of the 61 major prophecies concerning Him are 1 in 10^157 and the scientific foreknowledge in the bible are not fallacys[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...[3] Tom Parisi, Northern Illinois University http://www.niu.edu...[4] Chris LaRocco and Blair Rothstein, University of Michigan http://www.umich.edu...[5] Nilakshi Veerabathina, Georgia State University http://www.chara.gsu.edu...