IF ANY ONE were a 100% Fully human, that leaves NO room for e.g. a supernatural archangel!

Con: I find it very interesting, that my opponent appears to be either unprepared, or unwilling, to supply any actual evidence. Pro: IF ANY ONE were a 100% Fully human, that leaves NO room for e.g. a supernatural archangel! The Debate Topic speaks for itself! Con: Of course, to some extent we are both hampered by the fact that there is very little scientific evidence for either case, and what they is comes very much from what are often called fringe sciences. Such as the study of the paranormal. Pro: A 100% Fully human requires no requirement for proofs or evidence of the Paranormal! 100% = the entire amount leaving NO room for anything else e.g. a Supernatural god nor a Supernatural archangel! per"cent also per cent (pr-snt) adv. Out of each hundred; per hundred. (Source: http://www.thefreedictionary.com...) Hence a Fully 100% human = 100 parts per a maximum of 1 hundred! Thus a 100% Fully Human has NO room for anything else such as a Supernatural god nor a Supernatural archangel. Con: However, my opponent appears to be making a very basic and dangerous assumption. He makes the mistake of assuming, that the personality takes up any space inside the physical body. Pro: Con has drifted already from the subject and has wandered in to his spurious & fanciful irrelevancies? Con: My contention is, that Jesus was born a perfect human child, due to the operation of holy spirit on an egg in Mary's womb. Pro: For starters, Cons irrelevant divergance depends on what Con refers to as ' perfect? ' According to Cons propaganda this Historical MYTH jebus was a 100% human and nothing else - i.e. Consequently he was obliged to become like his "brothers " in all respects! . . . . (Heb. 2:17) KIT Story book To any rational person ' in all respects ' means a 100% pure human being! i.e. IF ANY ONE were a 100% Fully human, that leaves NO room for e.g. a supernatural archangel! To claim or assert that this Story book jebus was in some way a Fully archangel that became a human is to nullify and refute both my factual Statement & nullify and refute Cons very own propaganda he says is faulty? (i.e. e.g. Heb. 2:17) & IF Cons jebus were a literal pre-existant archangel, then it ending up in Mary's womb is perforce a Transplantation / Transference after first morphing from a archangel! Thus all it would be is a deceiving archangel dressed up in human flesh, pretending to be a Fully 100% human! Con: He was brought up by two loving and conscientious parents. They carefully taught him all about the God to which they were so faithful. No doubt they also told him of the special circumstances of his conception and birth. Pro: You speak falsehoods again according to your very own propaganda Con - Mary & Joseph didn't even believe what the Story book text states regarding their alleged miraculous child of a god - . . . his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing. 49 And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business ? 50 And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them. (Luke 2:41-50) KJV Story book Con: His perfect mind, Pro: IF its mind were perfect then according to your own propaganda Heb. 2:17 KIT Story book, being made . . . . like his "brothers " in all respects! then all its brothers must also be of a perfect mind? Obviously the mind of humans is not perfect else it wouldn't make imperfect decisions as humans invariably can do! Con: as well as the fact that at first he had merely his own personality that he naturally grew up with is demonstrated by his disputing with the religious leaders in the temple at age 13. The only special thing about him at that point, was his ability to think and debate at a higher level than much older adults. Pro: The biblical jebus is an unambiguous eternal Jew! The gospels have no sense yet that Jesus was anything other than a Jew. The gospels don't even have a sense that he came to found a new religion, an idea completely foreign to all the gospel text, and completely foreign to Paul. That is an idea which comes about only later. So, to say that he was a Jew is saying a truism, is simply stating an idea that is so obvious on the face of it, one wonders it even needs to be said. But, of course, it does need to be said because we all know what happens later in the story, where it turns out that Christianity becomes something other than Judaism and as a result, Jesus in retrospect is seen not as a Jew, but as something else, as a founder of Christianity. But, of course, he was a Jew. (Emphasis by Composer(Pro) Source: http://www.pbs.org...) So unless the J.ws are strictly adherents of Story book Jews, then the J.ws are just another of the myriad of Johnny Come Lately corrupt ideologies! Con: However, knowing his special birth, Pro: Like getting special priveleges like quantities of Gold that its contemporaries didn't! Like many events in Cons Story book, even this alleged ' birth ' was unfounded according to Historical reality - NB: Roman Catholic biblical scholar Raymond E. Brown in The Birth of the Messiah lists several reasons he does not believe the biblical account, including the fact that such a bright star would have been mentioned by others, but despite fairly good astrological records it is mentioned nowhere. (Source: http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org...) Con: Of course, that also meant that the original personality of God's son was no longer in the spirit body, because it now dwelt in the perfect physical body of Christ.. Maybe all is not necessarily demonstrated, but the possibility of this happening is more than clearly demonstrated. Pro: Heb. 2:17 alone decimates your concept! Con: It will therefore no longer be possible for my opponent to merely reiterate his first two very brief and very basic statements. Very brief and very basic statements I agree yet unambiguously fatal to Cults like yours!