Teachers should not help students with bad grades.

Thank you for replying back. Here are my rebuttals for your arguments.Counter for Argument #1: I believe you are correct on how students learn differently and how all are of different intelligence. But in the beginning of life, it would be logical that everyone has equal intelligence in the beginning. However, everything changes as time progresses and each students' character develops along with work ethics and such. If a student is aware that he/she is getting bad grades and he/she is continuing to get that with awareness, who is to blame for that? I will definitely agree that the teacher's main job is to teach, as it is spoken in the title. They are also trained to teach and they would have lectures that are well developed, concise, and express the main idea. If the student fails to pay attention to such things, that is obviously his/her fault. It is hard to understand how one would not understand that. I will not argue that every student learns differently either but the teacher will cater to that as he/she is aware of that. My point is that if a student fails even if a teacher does all she could to teach and explain the lesson and the student still fails, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. However, if the teacher does not meet those qualities that I listed earlier, the teacher would be gone of course.Counter for Argument #2: Okay, for my first arguments earlier, I did not include anything about mentally challenged students or students with learning dysfunctions. I don't believe they have the same pace as students as everyone knows. They should be in a different class anyways that are meant specifically for them where they are paired with other individuals that have the same problem, therefore making things much more equal. I apologize for not taking any statement on students with learning dysfunctions earlier.Counter for Argument #3: I believe those punishments you listed can only solve things temporarily, meaning the years that a student is in that specific school or other schools that have similar practices. As I mentioned before self motivation is key and that is what students should learn earlier. That is why I propose the fact that students should be much more independent by solving his/her own problems. Otherwise, they'll face something bigger in the future. On the part where you say that "a teacher needs to teach consequences", that should be part of their job anyways. Otherwise my concept would not be as what would be planned. I feel like when teachers teach of such consequences, the students don't really feel that "shock" unless they really experience it for themselves, and that is if they hit rock bottom. "If teachers teach their students good attitude at young ages then it will stick with them through life"If a student is taught any attitude or ethic, they will most likely stick through it if almost nothing gets in the way. But unfortunately, many things are able to get in the way. Social media is one thing with all the celebrities and such. For example, you are probably aware of how many celebrities (specifically actors, and musicians) gain fame that defy the teachings that hard work, self motivation, and work ethic gets you a Rolls Royce, Rolex, and a mansion. Some students could think that they will be that next celebrity and they don't have to do all that to be successful. Another example can be how a lot of mainstream music talks about partying and having some sort of pleasure with no display of the cold harsh reality. Many young adults and children's perspective of how to be successful can be altered and be different than what was taught from the beginning. Their innocence is changed from what they have seen and they start to attempt to be that ideal painting that is created by that side of society. Like you are basically saying, children are sponges, they will absorb anything that is said by someone of recognition or/and authority. Those who stay with what they have learned from parents and teachers will be the ones succeeding and being the strongest of the pack.Concluding: The teacher's job and their job is to cater to how a student learns, but those who do not understand no matter what (not including students with learning dysfunctions), they are not fit to what will lie in the future. Students with learning dysfunctions are a different story. The student has a big part as he/she really controls the outcome of his/her future so it is really up to them on how they choose. The least a struggling student can do is obviously change their grades. He/she would know who they are and generally know what bad grades can do but like I mentioned before, are aware of the consequences but don't feel that hard impact at that moment or/and when they are taught. I am not saying that all students who struggle (or in general) are like that but many are. Thank you once again and I hope to hear how you will counter my arguments.