Interracial Dating Negatively Impacts Cultures and Undermines true Diversity.

My opponent asserts that "integration doesn't effect" culture, but has also asserted that "We can see countless examples of other races fully integrating into societies, and many societies are built off a melting pot of cultures". Seeing as my opponent has given examples of how racial and cultural integration do -in fact- effect culture positively, it is irrational to assert that there are only positive effects of integration, and even more irrational to be dismissive of the negative effects of integration, or assert that there are no negative effects of racial/cultural integration in the form of Interracial Dating, on society. As I've said before, "Nowhere in my thesis do I argue that different races can/cannot integrate into a racially uniform society, and nowhere in my thesis do I argue that different cultures cannot contribute to one collective culture" - my opponent tends to miss the topic at hand. My opponent has given examples of the qualitative contributions of different races into a racially uniform society; however, that has absolutely nothing to do with the impact of Interracial Dating on culture and racial diversity. Interracial Dating does not only have qualitative implications on race/culture; meaning, the impact it has on society isn't solely in the form of contributions such as music, art, technological innovation etc... Interracial Dating also pertains to human reproduction, which has quantitative implications on race/culture. Humans/races, with respect to physical properties, are finite in population; whereas, colors are infinite in concept. As with the color analogy, my partner failed to correctly interpret the analogy. Color is simply wavelengths of light interpreted by the human eye. Therefore, color does not have the same physical properties as humans and cannot be subject to extinction, unlike humans and thus the cultures perpetuated by humans. My opponent mentioned that there are only three primary colors, and in mixing said colors, more colors are made; however, my opponent's assertion is predicated off the recognition of color as a concept that is not subjected to the same physical limitations as humans - it is not. For example: yes, on a computer screen, red and blue make purple; and thus, you've created three colors from two, without reducing the quantity of red and blue; however, in reality, a Black human and a White human produce a mixed person, decreasing the White and Black race, in order to increase the Mixed race. Similarly, when color is manifested in a finite form, and I have two vials -one vial being red dye and one vial being blue dye- mixing these vials would yield me purple die at the expense of the red and blue dye, leaving me with only one dye. This is the correct application of the "color mixing" analogy that I referenced, as it is interpreted in a way that is congruent with the physical properties of humans. For that matter, it is only logical that when a White person and a Black person have a child, two races are being combined and essentially sacrificed, for the sake of creating one race - there is no infinite wavelength of human beings that can be recreated and manipulated on a mere conceptual basis, the way my opponent's interpretation of color can be. If we concede the reality that Interracial Dating takes from two races, and makes one race, then we must also concede the reality that the two people of different races are no longer around to perpetuate their different cultures, should they combine to create a mixed race child. Because Interracial Dating threatens racial diversity, and humans/races are the only means of perpetuating culture, it is only axiomatic that Interracial Dating poses the same threat to culture, as it does to racial diversity. My opponent has cited America as an example of a melting pot of races and cultures; however, this proves my point; seeing as, the uniform/pure cultures of each different race during America's early segregated times, have been compromised and altered through integration, and said integration has yielded one culture -known as American culture- comprised of many different cultures. Again, similar to the sacrificing of two finite colors in order to yield one new color, America has sacrificed the purity and vitality of many pure cultures, to make one American culture; by natural definition, this is a threat to diversity. My opponent requested that I give examples, and I will. Common Chinese holidays are the Dragon Boat Festival, the Mid-Autumn Festival, and Qing Ming Jie. None of these traditional holidays are recognized as normal American holidays, although many people of Chinese origin reside in the United States. Common Indian holidays are Ram Navami, Dussehra, and Krishna Janmashtami. None of these traditional holidays are recognized as normal American holidays, although many people of Indian origin reside in the United States. Digressing from culture and onto race: South America was a land of Native Americans. When the Spanish were sent by the Spanish Cardinal to annex and colonize South America, many of the Spanish men had children with the Native women, lessening the population of pure South American Natives and Spaniards, and increasing the population of mixed-raced Hispanics - the same can be said for the Portuguese Slave Trade in South America. Again, "Nowhere in my thesis do I argue that different races can/cannot integrate into a racially uniform society, and nowhere in my thesis do I argue that different cultures cannot contribute to one collective culture." I've only proved that Interracial Dating negatively impacts culture and undermines racial diversity by subtracting from two races to produce one race, and therefore jeopardizing the existence of the cultures tied to those races, by eventually leaving no one to perpetuate said cultures.