The Atheists' God of Causation (by default) is Mathematical Probability

OK But my point is what metaphysic do atheists use to reconcile say the causation of our sun. What is the process for its existence, that is realised upon by the atheist mind without any metaphysic selected. If you like what does that default to in terms of our suns causation. Lets see we have dead matter giving rise to sentient matter? and... We have dead insentient matter communicating with sentient matter? It might sound terribly Aristotle-ean, but if the matter is inherently insentient or non causative in the mind what physical processes must have occurred to explain the causation of our sun... Lets see we have Newtonian mechanics, electromagnetism and gravity to explain how the sun was created or anything for that matter. lot. Plus whatever that which can be borrowed from the quantum universe that does not exhibit any sentience or subjectivity... which is not much. Briefly... The quantum aspects of matter and energy that make matter sentient are as follows: 1. Energy comes in quanta in a universe that is not continuous. Mechanism (older science as above) cannot be the whole story or the quantum world. Since quantum events only happen when observed the supposed objectivity of the science that goes hand in hand with that science is compromised. 2. Events not 'things'. Although quantum theory contradicts relativity theory describing gaps rather than a continuum, they both agree that events not things lie at the core of physical reality. A quantum is a packet of action rather than energy in Planck's equation. Events or processes are current understanding. It makes the cosmos a verb not a noun. The universe is "quantuming" or "cosmosing". (See Whiteheads Post modern cosmology.) Subjectivity and sentience appear fundamental. 3.Non Causal: Quantum events are non causal. they are inherently unpredictable. To an atheist mind they would appear utterly random and uncaused and seemingly random. But to the sub molecular particle there is a world of difference. the quantum even t would be self caused not uncaused. The notion of quantum choice is supported.As we know on a macro level with mammals etc. As we know each macro level is composed of hierarchies of lower level micro entities. If the lower level entities were devoid of choice how can we account for the emergence of choice at any level?. 4. Indeterminacy: See Heisenbergs uncertainty principal. The indeterminacy is intrinsic to the quantum events themselves. Causal determinism gives way to uncertainty built into the structure of reality itself. 5 Complementarity. Defies Aristotle logic. Quantum dualities are not discrete opposites. 6. Quantum Participation. The ideal of mechanistic physics is objectivity or 'plate glass science', but no such science exists. The observer is an integral part of the quantum system. 7. Quantum Non Locality. Mechanism cannot be the whole story when quantum events can occur over great distances at speeds faster than the speed of light. See French scientist Alain Aspect's work now confirmed. Quantum events somehow defy the presumed possibility of action at a distance where in relativity this is impossible. 8. Complexity /Chaos theory. All recognise a fundamental inter- relatedness between various parts of a whole system. Please consider these points a framework for the BOP you consider required. Happy to elaborate debate any of these points and how they affect the worldview in terms of the presumption of ontological dualism. In Summary: If there were say 999 gods of creation (causation) devised by the human mind, as a panpsychist. (theist), I would claim the God of Nature as what is shown by the great disclosure which is powerful evidence indeed. That makes me wonder what default mechanism of causation can be claimed by the atheist mind? As above it cannot be the God of Nature. Atheists must then choose another less sophisticated mechanism of causation to reconcile their physical existence. That of mathematical probability., which is just a part of nature.