The Trinity is Biblical, Jesus is God

You expect God's word to logical, but logic is all in the eye of the beholder. What makes sense to you might not make sense to another person and vice versa, so that argument fails. Also, the writings of a physicist on quantum mechanics won't make sense to a lot of people, but that doesn't make it not true or illogical. God, by definition, at least in this debate, is a supernatural being. Supernatural things don't conform to man's logic but can do things beyond our ability to comprehend. Like the legion of demons inside one man in Luke 8. How did they all fit? And why did they want to go into the swine? You mention Muhammad, but again, sickness still existed in his day: why didn't God empower him to heal? Using your logic, he should have. You claim that logic tells you that God exists, but you won't use religious texts. So why wouldn't a logical God want to have his revelation written down so that all can see it, even if they are not opening their hearts to hear his voice? God is not going to force himself on anyone. It's so amazing you put so much stock in Islam's claim that Jesus didn't die but was raised to God. Well, first century Roman historian Tacitus, and Jewish historian Josephus of that same era, both testify that Jesus was crucified under Pontius Pilate, just as the Bible said. So why is there absolutely no corroborating testimony from the first century, or even the first 6 hundred years after Jesus to corroborate the claim of the Quaran that Jesus didn't die? Here is a full quote Tacitus writing about 100 CE from Annals 15.44. Jesus and the Christians are mentioned in an account of how the Emperor Nero went after Christians in order to draw attention away from himself after Rome's fire of 64 AD: But not all the relief that could come from man, not all the Bounties that the prince could bestow, nor all the atonements Which could be presented to the gods, availed to relieve Nero From the infamy of being believed to have ordered the Conflagration, the fire of Rome. Hence to suppress the rumor, he Falsely charged with the guilt, and punished Christians, who were Hated for their enormities. Christus, the founder of the name, was Put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign Of Tiberius: but the pernicious superstition, repressed for a time Broke out again, not only through Judea, where the mischief Originated, but through the city of Rome also, where all things Hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their Center and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first Made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an Immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of Firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Christus is Latin for Christ. It says that he founded Christianity and was killed in Judea just as the Bible says. I can trust the Bible because the evidence supports it, can't say the same for the Quaran. The Bible hasn't been changed. My NIV is well supported by the ancient manuscripts, its still the same. Writing before 100 CE, Josephus says: Antiquities 18.3.3 Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was the Christ, and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men among us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians so named from him are not extinct at this day. So the Quaran can't be the Word of God because history proves it wrong. No serious scholar doubts that Jesus was put to death by crucifixion, so the Quaran was wrong to claim Jesus didn't die and is not God's word because God can't be wrong. Here is what scholars says: Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically,[f] and they consider the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) to be the best sources for investigating the historical Jesus.[19][20] Most scholars agree that Jesus was a Galilean, Jewish rabbi[21] who preached his message orally,[22] was baptized by John the Baptist, and was crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate.[23] In the current mainstream view, Jesus was an apocalyptic preacher and the founder of a renewal movement within Judaism, although some prominent scholars argue that he was not apocalyptic.[24][25] After Jesus' death, his followers believed he was resurrected, and the community they formed eventually became the Christian Church.[26] https://en.wikipedia.org... So, where is Jesus' body? The fact that none of the enemies of the Christians could produce his body tells me that the empty tomb was real. He was raised, and thus he was vindicated by God, all his claims to divinity. He was God.