LOST was the greatest T.V. series ever

You have the burden of proof instigator/pro; furthermore my opponent has accepted my definitions. My opponent has used an abusive argument by debating the definitions of the resolution rather than debating the actual resolution. If the debate really is about the greatest T. V. shows that are not still on then House should not be an option for my opponent because it is still on the air. If my opponent wants to debate the resolution in such a way then he should lose automatically, because he has chosen a show that’s still on air. However, if he would like to debate the resolution in the correct context in his last round then he may. House Is not the best T. V. series everywhere it is very popular but with recent episodes popularity has gone down. The resolution is about the best T. V. show and my opponent has just stated that House is NOT the greatest. He must have started watching Lost on Netflix instant and been blown away by its awesomeness. Although they did get rid of the supporting actors that isn't a very big deal it was new and exciting. I actually watched those episodes they were pretty good, however, when unraveling the mystery of Lost your adrenaline starts pumping! When he had to hire new fellows there was a process which turned into several episodes that were very good (they treated Osama you know) Umm… Are you implying that the hospital where house works supports terrorism? This is obviously not good for his case. And while the show is dependent on the main actor a supporting actor. My opponent agreed that without Hugh Lorie then the show would be nothing. . http://en.wikipedia.org...... My opponent has also gotten all of his information from Wikipedia. This evidence should not be considered valid because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone House makes references to the real world in via talk and props and who he is (an addict) a reference to the real world. so already House has filled to of YOUR criteria for being greatest ever. Hey there are addicts on Lost! Charlie from Drive Shaft! He did heroin until he met the cute pregnant chick on the island and then tried to kick the addiction (With the assistance of John Locke). Also, being an addict is not a reference to society. Conclusion: My opponent has violated his resolution. I have proven how Lost only fulfills two of my opponents arbitrary criteria and so does House so since it's a tie the win should go to me, because my opponent (in his argument that violated his resolution) had to prove that Lost is greater than house which he has not done. First of all my if my opponent chooses to debate the resolution his way, then he loses because House is still on the air. So my opponent should lose by trying to debate the definitions of the round to manipulate in his favor. Also, my opponent says that are arguments are tied 2-2, but he forgot all about my contention that Lost was planned! There for I am winning (according to my opponent’s logic). My opponent admits several things about House that show that would show that his show is not the greatest. He has dropped a few arguments in the round and has used Wikipedia as his source for evidence while I presented four different sources. Also, my opponent has twisted the resolution, and if we uphold by his standard of the resolution he should lose. Also, I would like to remind my opponent and the audience that it would be abuse to bring up any new arguments, attack any new arguments that he dropped, present new evidence, etc. dude to the fact that it will be impossible for me to respond. I hope I have inspired you guys to watch Lost. You’ll love it.