The World is Racist at Heart - 5's & 2's logic proves inevitable doom for anti-racist Whites

Many thanks to my opponent for making this debate and being willing to shed light on the universe we live in one debate at a time. I accept the challenge.Since there are no rules, I will go ahead and attack immediately instead of using this round solely for acceptance.First some Definitions.1. Racism. Defined by Merriam Webster as ": a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race : racial prejudice or discrimination." 2. Degraded. Defined by Merriam Webster as ": reduced far below ordinary standards of civilized life and conduct : characterized by degeneration of structure or function."3. Heaven. Defined by Merriam Webster as ": a place or condition of utmost happiness."4. 2-5 theory. Defined by my opponent with no sources. Roughly means "A theory where white society has devolved communal relations to the point of an I & You basis, while other races have communal relations of Us & Them, Racism is a Conspiracy Word."Why these definitions will become important I hope becomes abundantly clear later on.DEFENSE1. The 2-5 concept is a made up concept.No offense to you good sir, but I could find zero academic credence to support this idea. So clearly it is an idea that came from your own head. As such, if you wish to put it into an academic setting, you must have a multitude of sources that support the idea that a) everyone but whites are racist, b) racist people are superior in intelligence to non-racists, c) racist people are capable of eradicating all whites on the planet. Unfortunately, I don't believe you can prove any of these vital facts to your theory. But I invite you cordially to try.2. Heaven for a single race is unachievable."In the beginning the world was racist at heart, men wanted heaven for their race, but after some events every man was in pursuit of heaven for himself; at first it was unintentionally, but the mind of man had degraded over time, to the point where individuals pursue heaven intentionally."Genetic mutation dictates that even if you had the planet entirely populate by white people, over time you would see a darker race develop because of either the climate surrounding them, or because their melatonin level in their cells mutated within their DNA to the point that they actually grew darker. Science empirically denies that a single color of human race could exist by itself for uncounted millenia, that state being the definition of your heaven you describe as being a place of high happiness. "Scientists said yesterday that they have discovered a tiny genetic mutation that largely explains the first appearance of white skin in humans tens of thousands of years ago, a finding that helps solve one of biology's most enduring mysteries and illuminates one of humanity's greatest sources of strife. The work suggests that the skin-whitening mutation occurred by chance in a single individual after the first human exodus from Africa, when all people were brown-skinned. That person's offspring apparently thrived as humans moved northward into what is now Europe, helping to give rise to the lightest of the world's races." http://www.washingtonpost.com... Obviously the science supports me, and you had no sources.3. Putting the priority on Self and others is not proof of an unintelligent mind."_"I & You"_ The stupid word-technology is not as intelligent as the human mind. This is the 2's aspect."I don't honestly know why you think this is true. Once again I would request a source before voters consider this to be a valid argument. Aside from that, a human putting priority on self above us, is considered the very definition of survival. If you wish to be pragmatic about human life and thought, then examine this pragmatic thought. You should never trust someone else with your darkest secrets, or your survival. Rather you should give them incetives to work with you, and not betray you. But your relationship with them should never define what actions you take unless absolutely necessary. This willingness to put your own self interest above what you claim the racist nations hold as the "us vs them" concept, means that you do not need to be worried about being backstabbed by your community (which is something a "us" racist community does have to worry about).4. Whites could easily kill everyone with powerful weapons, so they hold the real power."The word-technology, being lesser than the mind, and being as esteemed as it is by degraded minds in the complexity. It's easily exploited by a greater force, and that is where the 5's-aspect comes into play."In 2014 these were the numbers on nuclear weapons. "According to a new report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), nine nations — the United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea — possess approximately 16,300 nuclear weapons. in total." http://www.businessinsider.com... Some things to consider. The US, Russia, UK, France and Israel are all predominantly white. China should be included in the 2s as well because community is a nearly non-existent concept in the ruling class of China. So that makes 6 out of 9 nations that are labeled by you as the 2s, who hold nuclear weapons in the quantity of most likely 10,000 plus. This is an extreme amount of power in the hands of the seemingly weak, and helpless 2s. Because this military might is in the favor of 2s, there is literally nothing 5s can do, no matter how intelligent they are, because if war did start all 5s would be wiped out completely. Eradicated. So I fail to see how your point makes sense. Also all this is assuming that word-technology even exists as a concept based upon intelligence.OFFENSE1. Racism is nearly a dead concept.You make it seem like we are always going to be racist at heart. That is what you are arguing. But you are really arguing Pro that anti-racist whites are going to be eradicated. That is not true, because many whites are becoming non-racist. According to this poll: http://www.dailymail.co.uk... which admittedly was a question more likely to be answered in a non-racist way, shows that very little of the world is actually racist. The level of racism in countries generally rests at 10% of their population, so if only 10% of the globe roughly, is racist, then clearly the concept is dying and non-racist whites have many allies. 5s are slowly becoming extinct.2. The mind does not degenerate because of accepting certain ideas.The definition of degraded I gave above, says it means to degenerate the state of something. So that thing that is being degraded had to be at a higher state before it was degraded. So the non-racist whites brains needed to be operating at a higher capacity before becoming accepting of non-racism, to consider the brains degraded. Sadly you will find no evidence of this. So clearly you are wrong on this that non-racists are less intelligent.3. Racism is non-unique and has not caused the annihilation of humanity so far.One can become non-racist, but racism itself is something that has always existed. Difference causes conflict. So when skin is different conflict is created. Clearly we are all still here. So why the hell is racism going to result in the eradication of a race? The last destructive racist war for the United States for example, was in 1860 when it fought a Civil War over racism. So clearly, racism is becoming less of a reason to take up arms, and more of something that is ideologically being eradicated in the warroom of the mind.In conclusion to the first round, I believe that you have an interesting concept, but all empirical evidence denies its existence. I would invite you to show me how it does exist next round!- 42