Islamic Socialism Is Superior To Atheistic Socialism

You say I "" fail to mention that civilians as in the masses of Sirte, Tripoli and Bani Walid fought for Gaddafhi to the end and beyond"" You have provided no evidence for this. Here is an article I have posted some key extracts below but please read it in full it is very eye opening and directly contradicts my opponents version of events. . http://en.wikipedia.org...'s_response_to_the_Libyan_civil_war "" Gaddafi had also stated that "those who don't love me do not deserve to live". "" Gaddafi was importing civilians to Misrata to use as human shields"" "" Gaddafi started to fight against civilians evidence surfaced that Libyan military units have refused to shoot protesters and Gaddafi had hired foreign mercenaries"" "" One group of mercenaries from Niger, who had been recruited from the streets with promises of money, included a soldier of just 13 years of age"" Nowhere does it state the civilians of Libya fought for Gadhafi because you have provided no evidence and I cannot find any I will presume you made a mistake. Please read my round 3 paragraph 13 where I address your moral dilemma. You have failed to come back to me on the financial situation being responsible for the increased quality of life in Libya rather than Gadhafi"s rule. You ask the question from what position am I judging moral standards ""Are you judging this from an Atheistic perspective? What Universal right and wrong are you judging these policies to be right and wrong from? Are you saying sense social pressures say something is right or wrong it makes it so? Did Germany not vote for the Nazis? "" Please let me expand. I was judging based on the declaration of human rights the very corner stone of a civil society. To answer your question, no the Nazis did not abide by human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights are basic rights that I argue every human being should be able to have a Islamic society will not allow for this I will list some of the discrepancies between Islamic teachings and human rights. Article 1 ""All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights"" Article 18 ""Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom"" Article 19 ""Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression"" Article 1, 18 and 19 are directly contradictory to the teachings of the Quran "Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends. (Surah 5:51)"" Article 1 does not differentiate between men and women but the Quran does "" If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them (Surah 4:34)"" "" Of course, men are a degree above them in status" Article 2 states that ""Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. "" Gadhafi himself ignored the human rights of the Jews he expelled purely based on religion. Finally Article 5 states ""No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. "" Surely cutting of someone"s hand for stealing a loaf of bread (common practice in Islamic nations) should be considered both cruel and inhumane. . http://www.un.org... The discrepancies above clearly show how Islamic teaching breach the human rights act. In an atheist society the government is not bound by any religious book therefore will be able to uphold all human rights demonstrating an atheist society is morally superior. Now on to your description of the Lockerbie bombings. ""Gadhafi payed compensation to those affected for an act caused by one of his own citizens. Even after this criminal citizen was released returned to Libya. who cost Libya so much, Gadhafi forgave him and welcomed him as a Libyan. "" This is how YOU view the Lockerbie bombing that killed 243 people. Not only do you defend Gadhafi"s state sponsored terrorism. You fail to mention Gadhafi gave the bomber a hero"s welcome home to celebrate his success at killing the innocent victims as well as ordering the bombing In the first place that should not be praised but condemned. Here are some links providing strong evidence of gadflies personal involvement . http://www.bbc.co.uk... . http://www.guardian.co.uk... . http://www.globalpost.com... All from international reputable news organisations. "" Since China is not a legitimate socialist country"" This is your opinion after reading one news article you fail to meet the burden of proof it if impossible to prove because china is a socialist state. . http://en.wikipedia.org... You ask ""Furthermore, does Islamic Socialism need to be compatible? Are you claiming since Islamic Morality is contrary to other societies that it is wrong? Is Atheistic morality not contrary to many societies around the world? "" The debate is ""Islamic Socialism Is Superior To Atheistic Socialism"" surely if Islamic socialism is not compatible it cannot be superior to a system that is compatible. As pointed out in my previous rounds in an atheist socialist society people are allowed to express their religious views in their own way as seen in modern day china. To summaries An atheist society is a more accepting of different faiths and ways of life making it a more inclusive society. A family can practice Islam in an atheist socialist society if they so wish but a family cannot practice Judaism in a Islamic socialist society. A world where we are more accepting to peoples faiths and abide by all human rights is clearly a better world for every one that is why an atheist socialist society is superior to that of an Islamic socialist society.