Abortion is wrong and bad

Introduction: Thanks for that response Lydia. I would like to comment on the images in Lydia’s response. I don’t understand how internet memes are relevant to this debate. Besides this fact, they are false. “Abortion… is an essential measure to prevent the heartbreak of infant mortality.” The … means that there was a break in the text, meaning that she said something different before that. She probably said, “Proper medical care is an essential measure to prevent the heartbreak of infant mortality.” Substituting something else out for another to give the illusion of a message is pathetic propaganda. I fully respect my opponent, I am only talking about the meme. The other meme is true, but makes the assumption that the “someone else” is really a person. Rebuttal: “That being said, I stand my ground as to why the stages of unborn life dealt with during abortion, as per adversion, should always be protected (because) they are humans.” Lydia attempts to defeat my sperm argument. Yet completely restates what I defeated. Every single sperm is “unborn life” and since Lydian says unborn life, “should always be protected (because) they are humans.” Therefore every single sperm should be protected with human rights, according to Lydia. All I am doing is following out her logic, the only way to defeat this would be to say that sperm aren’t unborn life, but, sperm is obviously unborn life. Lydia then attempts to defeat my argument that a fetus is not a human because of the characteristics with this, “What about the children born with disabilities? They are still considered 'human,' despite that they might not have ‘all the characteristics.’ " Children with disabilities still look extremely human, I’m not sure if there is a disability that makes you look like a different species. “Have you ever seen the movie ‘The Giver’?” Yes, I’ve also read the book, and the entire book series. “In a scene or two it gives you an idea of the true definition of abortion, in a sense, because they "get rid of" unwanted babies by surgical murder which they name "Release." It shows how we sugercoat the meaning of abortion and make it sound like disposing a fetus is no problem and nothing that should concern anyone.” Yet we are talking about fetuses, not already born children. “This is false because pregnancies do not "usually" end that way.” I apologize, I meant the women that die, usually die that way. “Killing a halfway grown woman or a child who would have a full life ahead?” Now your categorizing which people deserve to live or not. “Con assumes three things here: 1) that welfare is a bad thing, 2) that money is more important than the life of the baby, and 3) that the baby will most likely be a threat to society and criminal. This is something to consider. Abortion equals death while life equals oppurtunity, no matter how "bad" it might be," and you should let the child decide whether he wants to live or not once he can do so for himself.” 1: Welfare is not a bad thing, I was merely stating that it takes up tax dollars. 2: You still have to prove that a fetus is a human which has not been done yet. 3: this is a proven fact by statistics and research. You can’t “let the child decide” if it wants to live or not. The fetus won’t decide, it is not logical to assume that the child would say yes, nor is it that the child says no. Conclusion: I have stated my rebuttals, and I look forward to Lydia’s response. Thank you!