Oneness Pentecostalism

I am particularly fond of this topic. I hope to have an interesting debate. I would like to clear up a few things before we begin. I will be the negative or CON in this debate so I have the task of arguing that the Doctrine of Oneness is in fact fallible. The title of this debate is oneness Pentecostalism; I am assuming that we are not debating the many different forms of Pentecostalism, but the doctrine of oneness which makes this belief distinct from other Pentecostal denominations. Please specify if otherwise. 1. I am assuming the King James Bible will be the only Bible we will count as a reliable source for this debate. And the ONLY reliable source for this debate. 2. For this debate we agree that God does exist and is fact for this debate. 3. From the resolution in this round we gather that the Father and Son is one and the same person. And through the mind of the human Christ, Father God (Spirit) reveals his will to man. All things known by Christ are known by the Father (Spirit) and vice versus. And from the three different doctrines we have also learned that Pro adheres to the first doctrine of oneness, Orthodox. And being that Pro believes Orthodox and not Neotisoriansin or Sabellianism the beliefs associated with these two doctrines are not fact in this debate. Please specify that Christ either has a separate conscience from God or that the two consciousness are different but with all knowledge of Heaven and of God. This seems contradictory when you read the statement below. Inside of the man Christ Jesus, God perceived everything from within a human mind. The incarnation caused the eternal God to exist in two different consciousnesses. He continued to exist in an omniscient consciousness in heaven, while he also existed within a human consciousness on earth. There are not two or three conscious persons in God, but rather the one personal God exists in two consciousnesses--human and divine. (1) Orthodox. This is what I believe. There is a real distinction between the Father and Son brought about by the incarnation about by the incarnation. (2) Neotisorianism. This is what most Oneness Pentecostals believe today. This divides Christ's two natures into almost two persons, where "sometimes he speaks as a man, and sometimes as God. " I reject this view. (3) Sabellianism. This view purports that God changed from the Father to the Son and from the Son to the Holy Spirit. I reject this view, and it is defunct. I have focused on the above statements because they seem to be the hinge pin of this debate. All other arguments rest on the personage of God. Arguments like this; Therefore, God and Christ are two distinct beings, but not two distinct persons, This argument relies on what the personage of God actually is. The Doctrine of Oneness states that God is one person in multiple forms or beings, but all are still one God working in one or two consciousnesses'. Unlike the Doctrine of the Trinity that states God is three consciousnesses working in three persons together in one will or purpose I would like the Pro to confirm these as fact for his side of this debate. After my opponent affirms these statements and gives further argument I will begin to argue my side of the debate. I hope to see your arguments soon.