BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Bernie Sanders would make a good president.

These "Multiple problems" that could happen to Bernie Sanders, don't appear to have any correlation to his age, in fact breaking your legs happens to people of all ages. Even if he did break his leg and have to be in a wheelchair, this would not make him appear weak. One of our most renowned Presidents, Franklin D. Roosevelt, was in a wheelchair, wasn't he the president to boost America's economy in the worst economic depression this country has seen? Who are these "Senators" you speak of that so outshined Sanders? When Sanders is politically active speaking with the President himself and going along the streets speaking to the common man he is being outshined? North Korea is a very extreme example, and even so will adding more military spending, that will agitate North Korea more, really improve the situation that is so fragile, I don't think anyone can agree on that. Sanders has also specifically stated that the money for the National Government, will be going to clean renewable energy resources, better health care to all people (especially the veterans!), and to help boost the economy with better wages for the working class to stimulate the economy. Could you please define your terms, specifically presentable, which is just atrocious to use for the man's hairstyle which is his choice. And are you really as low to go to a totally off topic discussion about abortion?
Bernie Sanders would make a good president.

He may be in a healthy condition currently but it is completely possible that he can die in the next four years. Multiple things can happen. He can fall and break his frail legs and have to be in a wheel chair during his presidency. I don't want a weak elderly man being the face of our nation! Also his "experience" as you call it hasn't helped anyone while he has been a senator! He has been outshined by many other senators who have had way less experience than he has had. If he cuts our military fund and someone, for instance, North Korea decides to launch a nuclear missile at us I don't think a diplomatic talk will help us out very much. They haven't so far! He never stated that he was going to use this money to help out the economy maybe he will put the money towards helping the economy or maybe he will put the money towards something else. We dont know. I mean this is the guy saying we should increase minimum wage nationwide! Of course he has his freedom of hairstyle but he should at least make him self look presentable. Even if we currently have the right to have an abortion doesn't mean you should have an abortion
Bernie Sanders would make a good president.

A man in a perfectly healthy condition, no matter the age, will not just die or have full on dementia, within his full 4 years. Also wouldn't being the eldest president just help with all the experience he has had over all the years of his life? The only reason he will be cutting military spending is to find diplomatic solutions first, instead of using American lives as the first line of action. Money he is going to be using to help the working force to get back to work and stimulate the economy, will be coming from a few very rich upper classes, who although might well have earned their money, are only going to be missing less than a few percent of their income they make in a year. Plus freedom of hairstyle is a natural human right!
Movie Debate

Fight Club has its warrants, but Raider of the Lost Ark is in a class of its own. I will show that through the rounds of this debate. For this round, I will make it simple. Raiders was ahead of its time and set the precedence for all action movies that followed. Raiders showed the viewer a continuous, never letting up level of excitement that kept the viewer on the edge of their seat through its entirety. Through later rounds I will make it ever so clear why Raiders surpasses Fight Club. For now, let me share some box office info: http://www.boxofficemojo.com... http://www.boxofficemojo.com... They say numbers speak volumes.... $175,191,923 more in gross box office sales on $45 million less in budget. Raiders of the Lost Ark was a model for all action movies to follow and will forever reign as a classic.
Movie Debate

For this final round and conclusion of this debate I would like to start with a quote from the movie "Raiders of the Lost Ark." Marion: You"re not the man I knew ten years ago. Indiana: It"s not the years, honey, it"s the mileage. And it's the mileage of "Raiders" that helps it stand alone as a successful, classic, movie of all ages. Just like Indy, the movie has aged well and continues to be revered and watched over and over again. Let's look at who our select movies appeal to. "Fight Club" may have good characterization, and a deep plotted script but its violent and provocative nature narrows it's audience. While "Raiders" includes romance and fighting in its script, it is tamer and more favorable to a larger more diverse audience. This is why "Fight Club" will never surpass "Raiders" in total popularity, appreciation, and noteworthiness. Simply put, more people have enjoyed "Raiders of the Lost Ark." And yes, there are cases where numbers aren't exactly truthful. But, there are cases where they simply support claims of fame. The numbers are solid and true when it comes to "Raiders." By the way, those that dumped ice buckets on their heads and didn't donate, still offered their free services of advertising this cause. The viral effect was the true point of that event. So if a few didn't donate money, they donated their actions that helped to popularize an important cause. "Fight Club" would do much better pitting against another flick of its nature. It certainly is a film of its time... but not of all time. For that, there are movies at a different level, enduring, timeless and fully engaging and that elite level, that elite class belongs to movies such as "Raiders of the Lost Ark." Now some quick notes: Characterization: Indiana Jones is truly a memorable, adventurous and fun character with his coolness, cleverness, and sometimes slightly weaknesses (snakes). Marion is that very beautiful but tough skinned woman with lots of grit. Together their dialogues are fun and entertaining and keep us bonded to their adventures. Script: Starting with the opening scenes to each scene after, we are fluidly moved from action to action and kept spell bound. Cinematography: For it's time, the cinematography was ahead of its time, well planned and well orchestrated. Consider the fight with the German Mechanic and the airplane scene. Music Score: The soundtracks for "Raiders" is composed and conducted by John Williams, one of the best soundtrack composers of all time. The lyrical lines of the melodies are fantastic and memorable and put you in the right mood for the scene playing. Now, my argument that "Raiders of the Lost Ark" is a better movie than "Fight Club" is solid and sensible. "Raiders of the Lost Ark" not only beats "Fight Club" but it stands tall as one of the funnest, most entertaining movie of all time.
Movie Debate

My opponent said that there are certainly examples that reasonably reject the notion that numbers never lie which means that my argument from round 3 in which i said that it is not always true that numbers speak volumes is correct. My opponent said that my examples are awkward and non-proving and i do not agree with him. I said that by the argument that numbers speak volumes it would mean that George Bush was an awesome president because he got most of the votes on elections of 2000 and 2004 which is neither an awkward or a non-proving example. The other example that i said is that by the argument that numbers speak volumes it would mean that it is better to pour cold water on your head than to donate to charity because more people poured water on their head than donated. I agree that the ALS Association earned a lot of money but i know that there was more people that did the challenge and did not donate then the people who did the challenge and donated. Later my opponent said that my arguments in which i was talking why Fight Club is better than Raiders of the Lost Ark are only opinion based. In my arguments i said why i think that Fight Club is better then Raiders and i explained it on a very good way. I do think that some of my arguments are opinion based but after all this hole debate is opinion based because some people can like one movie more than the other and in this debate we try to show why are opinion is better than the opponents opinion. Now i am going to give one last argument and end my round. Raiders are rated 8.6 on IMDB while Fight Club is rated 8.9 which shows that people like Fight Club more than they like Raiders. http://www.imdb.com... http://www.imdb.com...
The world needs more feminism

I shall rebut and finally conclude. I used Australia as one example of sexism in relation to domestic violence and my opponents defense to this was that the population of Australia was to small to be seen as a valid point, perhaps I should have used India as a better example where the population is much larger and as we all know if anyone reads the news violence against women is common place. So if you lump India in there as well the numbers of deaths would sky rocket. So the women of Australia do not matter? Just because they are a minority we should disregard there suffering and say it is of no concern? I don"t see how you can look anyone, anyone in the face, or live with yourself, and say anything so hideously, wickedly immoral as that. Or even imply it. Of course 0 men being killed is a good number but it should be the same for women. I see nothing wrong with marriage at all unlike my opponent however I also see nothing wrong with ending a marriage no one should feel pressured for financial or other reasons such as the way they will be 'judged' by society to stay in an unhappy marriage and thus life. "the black family. Once equally employed and independent" I think you mean to replace "employed and independent" with forced labor and slavery. "Can you not agree, especially at a young age, women are seen as objects and temporary bragging rights opposed to a person" so you agree we do need more feminism then. Because the way I see this this is an equality issue. All of what my opponent has said is well and good but does not really answer the question of why the would does not need more feminism my opponent talks about issues of relationships and such but this has very little to do with feminism rather about how morals and values change and develop over time. I on the other hand showed how the empowerment of women is the only known cure to poverty and how every time equality for women has risen in the third wold so has quality of life. Why would any one stand against equality for all around the world I do not know.
The world needs more feminism

Sorry this took so long i've been busy. According to google and the oxford dictionary the definition of feminism is "the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes (1) (2). Thus via this very sound definition those who support that women's rights should be equally to that of mens are by definition a feminist even if they choose not to recognise the label. Unfortunately as I shall argue throughout this debate not everyone has this mind set. For arguments sake I shall refer to these people as 'anti-feminists' for this debate. That we know of there is only one cure for world poverty and it can be phased very simply 'the empowerment of women', go to Bolivia, Bangladesh, or Yemen and see (3) (4) (5). Give women control over their reproductive cycle make them not just the beasts of burden and beats of childbearing that they become, give them the right to get a paying job and the floor will rise in that community it has never failed anywhere (3) (4) (5) every time woman's right go up in the third world poverty goes down, against this one solution 'anti-feminism' has turned it's face, the efforts of the 'anti-feminists' in the third world mean more people die not less. And I appeal to my audience, what is more important the ending world poverty? It is one of if not the biggest issue humanity faces at the moment. This is why the world needs more feminism, to save lives. This is my opening argument I look forward to my opponents. Thank you source 1.https://www.google.com.au... 7gK8HC8gePz4CgDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=define+feminism 2. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com... 3. http://en.wikipedia.org... 4.http://www.economist.com... 5. http://en.wikipedia.org...
If the Burmese Government wants no aid then other countries around the world should stop trying

The question whether one should intervene in order to help in Myanmar can be reframed as a question whether international law has more validity than human rights. Or at least under which circumstances international law can be broken so that human rights are upheld. Now as the dictatorial regime of Myanmar is suppressing their citizens and letting them starve and die, it would be morally and legally wrong to let them have their say. The human rights of the Burmese people are to be defended against the will of their government. The actions of the Myanmar government can be interpreted as genocidal against their own people. In this case the UN permits the international community to intervene and save those suppressed and neglected by their own government.
[League Of Legends] Mid laner Faker Of SKT T1 is the best mid laner (Global)

I apologize for my forfeit one round. Any who, I will admit that dandy had a better approach to ganks. Even so, faker should have 1). Expected the counter gank from dandy with map awareness. 2). Known they would lose the fight if they engaged and should have instead retreated. Onto your second point, frustration is a key thing to learn how to handle. The flash with zilean was a miscalculation indeed. This is a big hole in Faker himself as a player. If he gets a great start, he will keep going with the lead and be fine. However, if he starts losing, he seems to panic and get frustrated and will waste summoners. During the 2nd match between ssb and ssw worlds, pawn had bad start by getting destroyed during a level 1 raid. However, Pawn saw the fatal mistake of ssb trying to take dragon and got a double kill which put him back in the lead. To your second point with the interview, it was indeed stated that pawn was not the best on his team and could rely on his teammates to carry. However there would still have to be pressure on him to do flawless like the rest of his team so that the other team would not be fed and such. His personality is relaxed while faker is a little more alert. If faker freaks out when he dies, then he is not entrusting his team to do well. A good mid laner would not have the feeling of carrying the game and instead would entrust his team to do well. Blaming his frustration on his teammates is never well dignified as the chemistry becomes worse and would make ganks harder to pull off. Your 3rd point has some flaws as well. During season 4, most of the champions played were assassins. Kha zix for example was most likely the most played jungler in the world tournament. Fizz was played by pawn a lot who is considered an assassin. If you include Jayce"s new blue build assassin along with talon, then you have some of the best assassins in the game being played in the mid lane. This would then support my statement that faker"s champion pool is vast, but is not vast quality wise. I agree with faker having outstanding mechanics (it is what made him known), but new mid laners such as rookie, dade, and pawn have shown to match mechanics. In conclusion, faker was the best in 2013, but now is trailing behind other mid laners, which in definition, does not make him the best mid laner. Thank you for the debate
[League Of Legends] Mid laner Faker Of SKT T1 is the best mid laner (Global)

To back my points further,Anxiety can cause major or minor headaches, and can easily disturb the senses. (http://www.calmclinic.com...) Because of this very fact, we can safely assume knowing you have to carry a team during a game, can create anxiety and thus cause headaches and lost of focus during game. A reference could be when a player in League Of Legends feels anxiety when playing Solo Q because he/she doesn't know who their going up against or what kind of team they'll get or thinking about what happens if they do bad during the Solo Q. So Faker = Must win lane phase to carry, PawN = Don't have to win lane phase to win.As for Faker's mechancs, mechanics personally is a person's skill capability on a champion, when that champion is at it's full extent in power, or skill capability as a player and simply knowing what to do next. Therefore, I believe Faker's mechanics are at least top 10 globally.As for Faker's champion pool, again Faker is probably regarded as the player who has the most largest champion in lcs/ogn, according to many lcs/ogn anaylist. ex. Brought riven to mid, and Zilean.And as for any other points I've I stand my points.
[League Of Legends] Mid laner Faker Of SKT T1 is the best mid laner (Global)

¨The video you linked was all about 1v1 as there was not a gank in the video. The video before had examples of ganks and counter ganks where pawn was jayce while talon was faker. During the second example of the ganks, bengi and faker clearly had pawn, but due to a lack of communication, bengi accidently kicked pawn away which gave pawn the clear advantage. For the first gank attempt, Pawn did not have much help from dandy while faker went in what seemed to be too soon and almost got soloed by pawn.As for talon vs kassadin, at the 5 or 6 second mark, you could see faker having his minion wave pushed up. Since kassadin is bad early game, wouldn"t it have been more logical to either freeze the wave or let it be pushed for protection of tower? It seemed as though faker was over extended on the kassadin.For the NBA comparison, I would say that a game like league of legends does not continue to have legends like a sport would (even if this is considered a sport). Maknoon and pray used to be considered the best top laner and adc, but now those positions are passed down to whomever seems to have the best stats of the year. Faker was ahead of his time in 2013, but now he has fallen behind or is on equal grounds.¨Yes, Con is right, Faker in the video I provided only lost 1 time to PawN sololy, while the others were from the help of Dandy. or Bengi just not doing good. Con has said previously that Teamwork is also an aspect of a great mid laner, and obviously the video of Faker vs PawN consisted of ganks from both sides, but Con must admit that Dandy's ganks were more effective than Bengi's. Which brings me to my next point, in this video the Zilean (Faker) vs Yasuo (PawN) obviusly on that flash play by Faker with Zilean, Faker mis calculated his damage and seemed extremely frustrated a few times, when he lost to PawN. With an interview with PawN, PawN stated that he didn't feel pressured during games because he knows if he loses his team will carry the game, while on the other hand, SKT TI has fallen as a team ever since Poomandu left and came back which I say completely messed up the SKT's roster and team chemistry and the meta has shifted heavily away from Faker and many assassin players, and Faker seems to still be doing good at the moment, in which he has to carry the team with pressure.To back my point further, during the season 3 world, Faker never was seen frustrated even after being semi-soloy taken down, which we can safely assumed that he also was relieved of his team be able to carry if he lost.
[League Of Legends] Mid laner Faker Of SKT T1 is the best mid laner (Global)

"However if Con agrees with this then obviously what Con stated about the 1v1 between Faker and PawN is fatal, because both PawN and Faker did not receive a proper gank that had affected on or the other during their laning phase (www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMLNVKPAHmY) and It's a fact that Kassadin has an incrediably weak laning phase like: Fizz, or Riven( in the mid lane) and more. While on the other hand, Talon has a much better laning phase against a Kassadin." The video you linked was all about 1v1 as there was not a gank in the video. The video before had examples of ganks and counter ganks where pawn was jayce while talon was faker. During the second example of the ganks, bengi and faker clearly had pawn, but due to a lack of communication, bengi accidently kicked pawn away which gave pawn the clear advantage. For the first gank attempt, Pawn did not have much help from dandy while faker went in what seemed to be too soon and almost got soloed by pawn. As for talon vs kassadin, at the 5 or 6 second mark, you could see faker having his minion wave pushed up. Since kassadin is bad early game, wouldn"t it have been more logical to either freeze the wave or let it be pushed for protection of tower? It seemed as though faker was over extended on the kassadin. For the NBA comparison, I would say that a game like league of legends does not continue to have legends like a sport would (even if this is considered a sport). Maknoon and pray used to be considered the best top laner and adc, but now those positions are passed down to whomever seems to have the best stats of the year. Faker was ahead of his time in 2013, but now he has fallen behind or is on equal grounds.
[League Of Legends] Mid laner Faker Of SKT T1 is the best mid laner (Global)

¨I would add on that a great mid laner should be able to work well with their team. On to the categories.¨Con has now stated that a great mid laner should also be able to utilize with their team, while I do admit this sense of teamwork in a great mid laner. However if Con agrees with this then obviously what Con stated about the 1v1 between Faker and PawN is fatal, because both PawN and Faker did not receive a proper gank that had affected on or the other during their laning phase (www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMLNVKPAHmY) and It's a fact that Kassadin has an incrediably weak laning phase like: Fizz, or Riven( in the mid lane) and more. While on the other hand, Talon has a much better laning phase against a Kassadin. As for mechanics, I would like to say that there is a difference between mechanics and a matchup. Personally, mechanics is when a way a player plays a champion, when that champion is at their strong extent during a game. As for the 1v1 between Faker and PawN, that was merely a matchup between a Talon (PawN) and a Kassadin (Faker) which like I said PawN has the upper hand during laning phase and probably during mid or late game. I do admit that Faker has gotten a little worse, since Season 3, but Michael Jordan is still considered the best because of his legacy in the NBA, and the only reason why he was still considered the best the NBA has ever seen, is all because no one has ever matched Michael Jordan's highlights in his history. The same thing goes with Faker, no one at the moment has matched Faker's superiorness of season and even now no one has surpassed Faker.