Derren brown is an amazing person.

Con firstly introducts her Arguement with no immiediate elaboration..She picks out one experiment that derren brown hosts, and brand it " horrendous" she then explained the man in the experiment was terrified and that the trick was realistic what Con is forgetting that derren browns trick uses tricks and misdirection, its supposed to " spook" the contender out and make Him see a different view on certain things, It also focuses on derren browns immidiate concentration and commitment , Furthermore it is very unlikely the man would have a heart attack, Because derren brown insures a 100% safety and he uses different types of hytnotispm to ensure the contender wont relapse. Also the man obviously volunteered to do it for the experience, so whats your point there? Con also then goes on to say " his tricks our either explainable or just didnt work" Firstly derren has only failed in 2 tricks, The first one bieng " how to win a casino" on channel 4 the second he did on a man in his mind tricks programme, Other than that i dont see any factual fails! Also if his tricks as you say are explainable, please elaborate more.. How does he do it then? Derren brown has been working on his progress as an illunist , magician artist , skepticalist etc since he was young, he dosent insist he has a sixth sense, He tells the audience and impliments that his tricks or done By the power of initutive and skill, His shows are 100% full proof, and con explains its "fake" I ask con this, what exactly is he faking when he can do momentum tricks and still explain how he did it? :s He tells people this<> Derrens browns first tricks used the power of suggestion and instinct, He also did a show telling people how they could do it at home! so where are the stooges/actors there ..HM? Also his show was not all showmanship, if you looked carefully and anaylsed his work you would see , he used all of the above of misdirection , power of suggestion remote viewing etc. Furthermore just like yourself, people thought the lottery stunt was A fix, That they used software cameras etc to elibirate the numbers, In fact only 2 days later did Derren want to prove his theory by showing the world how he did it, he spent weeks in a remote place using past consequetive numbers to predict what the outcome would be . Of course it was mearly impossible! the odds bieng alot different from guessing heads or tails on a coin. But to prove the skeptics, he did a pre recorded show in which he and the crowd he worked with ultimatley figured out the numbers using past winning lottery numbers, which numbers have been concieved more than once etc, and the numbers were right! to prove his theory he had witnesses to show that it was pre recorded days before the lottery was on. People like to think everything is a fix! become it seems to unrealistic thats why the link my opponent has posted has people who are unsure, yet if they looked into it and watched the follow up show they would see that. Derren Like i said dosent say he is a psychic" stunt man he uses psychology in his experminents, how we interact and how we can trick our brain that in my defense is amazing! Not alot of people can control how they deal with situations and use reverse psychology. Con hasnt implimented or suggested how derren brown isnt " amazing" Even IF his stunts were made up, what defense do you have which proves he isnt amazing? If he can still " con" people in such a realistic way what is so negative about that? Though these arent my opinions, I DO believe derren brown is amazing, he can use his mind , hes an outstanding artist he can control people plus he did a tv show on how you can do the same at home! Con is adament that everything derren brown does is fake!, how do you explain this?.. what proof have you? If you look back at his previous shows you would see the way he does it, how when and where!-- So what is cons defense if he is not " amazing" would that make him unintresting ?, because his shows has shown over 1000s of viewers which watch his stunts, shows, so he cant be that bad!. In conclusion my arguement stands unless con can provide me with any refrences on how derren brown isnt amazing! and can provide an explanation to her statments on her stooge theory, then my arguement stands clear. vote pro! <> <> sources http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com...