Resolved: god Probably exists

The KCA1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.2. The universe began to exist. (has a beginning) 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause.--> Logic the KCA1. if p is true q is true2. p is true3. therefore q is trueIf the first two premises follow, it is logical to assume the third is correct, so this arguments conclusion are highly reliying upon the first two to be true. That's why atheists mainly focus on one, as that is the easiest to "disprove". So, assuming 1-2 is correct, there is nothing unsound about this argument. [2] P1) Everything has a causeThis argument is proven by mere observation. This is basic intuition and a default position of human nature, though this can be easily proven by more then mere impulses. Everything we have witnessed has been caused, by something somewhere. It has a cause. There are countless examples. One example is a factory that makes the computers we sit at today. The computer was created by a machine that made the computer, and caused its existence. The factory was made by workmen and tools. The tools where caused by mining, the mining was caused by people, which where caused by evolution. Which was caused by the big bang, which was caused by........ [fill in the blank, a creator] So as my hint suggests this applies to all things, people, entities, and everything. Now a common ploy is to either ague quantum fluctuations or nothing exists, and nothing that exists means nothing has been caused. But if nothing existed, the numbers of events happening in past times would be infinite, and anything that "exists" would therefore be infinite itself. If this where true, we would be alive at the time of creation, well we would actually just exist, and everything that "exists" would be living alongside us today. I dont remember seeing any prehistoric creatures today. So this objection is a moot. P2) The universe has a beginning The Second Law of Thermodynamics reaffirms my statement here. It argues the universe is not eternal. It states heat is not an eternal unlimited force, as part of the theory. [3] Also, it has been observed the universe has been expanding rapidly since its creation and continues to grow today, as the energy is not unlimited the universe is thus using a supply of energy, and eventually run out. As the universe now will undoubtedly run out of energy, and eventually crunch up,[4]this shows the universe is not eternal and will eventually end. And everything tends towards entropy. Meaning the universe does in fact have a beginning. Now a common objection too two (you need to refute 1 or 2 to make 3 invalid) is the universe is eternal. But as stated it violates The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which is a law not a theory take note. "Thermodynamic properties of the universe dictate that, even if the universe did oscillate, an eternal universe could not occur. This is because, the farther back in time one goes, the shorter the time span of oscillations, or rotations. Thus, the universe could not be eternal."[5]“The effect of entropy production will be to enlarge the cosmic scale, from cycle to cycle. . . . Thus, looking back in time, each cycle generated less entropy, had a smaller cycle time, and had a smaller cycle expansion factor than the cycle that followed it.” [6, 7]So to conclude:If the universe and big bang had no cause, we could arguably live in a paradox. So for the universe to exist, without a cause, there would be no beginning therefore time would be also infinite. And there would be infinite time for any and all events to take place. Now this causes a fallacy we all know as begging the question. The question it begs is: if time is infinite, then why is right now actually happening right now? Now lets assume God used his methane and a lighter 100,000,000 years ago to create a big bang, or whenever he so wished to use his methane and fire, to create the universe. Then we can ask why did it happen at a fix time?Now this is proven by Hilberts hotel, which proves the infinite cannot exist. The paradox goes as follows: a hotel has an infinite amount of rooms, and it is full. Bob decides he wants to go to this hotel. Lady in room one goes to room two. Transvestite in room 2 goes to 3, man in room 3 goes to room 4 etc. But this is a paradox. If all rooms are full, then there is no room for Bob. But there are infinite rooms, so there is always room. Thus the universe had a cause. CONCLUSION:I used the KCA in my case, using its logic: 1. if p is true q is true2. p is true3. therefore q is trueThe first two are correct, therefore 3 is also. Vote pro. (hope I wasn't bad, I dont really do religion debates often)[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://www.debate.org...[3] http://en.wikipedia.org...[4] http://en.wikipedia.org... [5] http://www.skepticalchristian.com... [6] Duane Dicus, et.al. “Effects of Proton Decay on the Cosmological Future.” Astrophysical Journal 252 (1982)