BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Spit vs. Semen for Rude People's Food

1) It's more worth itSo cheesedingo says semen is better for food because you feel a feeling of accomplishment and you feel like saying "F*ck yeah, I just did that sh1t." I have one thing to say to this.HOW THE HELL WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO JIZZ IN A KITCHEN???????????? I mean to jizz you have to be aroused. Unless one has a strange fetish for cooked food, how is one supposed to just jizz on command???????Also, I don't think jizzing in the rude customer's food would come with a better feeling of "hell yeah!" than spitting would. I mean, when you spit at someone, or in someone's food, I believe you would feel like a f*cking boss. It's more of a "come at me bro!" gesture than jizzing.2) It's easier to get away with I highly disagree with this. My opponent focuses on the taste of spit vs. the taste of semen. But there's a BIG problem with the whole semen thing. For a guy to jizz in a plate of food, he's gonna have to1 - unzip his pants2 - take his member out3 - jizz (who knows how long this would take)4 - put his member back in his pants5 - zip up his pants For ANYONE to spit in a plate of food, this is what they have to do1 - spitSo while semen takes 5 steps to accomplish, spit only takes one quick step. This means that while the idiot waiter is trying to jizz in a plate of food, there's a LOT more time for a manager or customer to see him, which will only end in his a$$ getting fired. Meanwhile, the smart revenge-taking waiter could spit in 10 plates of food by the time the other waiter gets done with one plate.3) It is a better use for semen Cheesedingo thinks a better use for semen is to add it to food. You know what I think is a better use for semen??? Getting yo freak on. That's right, why add your precious supply of baby-making juice to food when you can go get yo freak on? Spit can be utilized for adding to food, but semen should be saved for those special moments. Over to cheesedingo.
Spit vs. Semen for Rude People's Food

My opponent have excellent examples of those type of people who you just can't stand if you are a waiter/waitress. But if there is someone who is REALLY pushing you over the edge, just spit won't do it. That's why I say that semen, yes, SEMEN, should be put on rude people's food to display your revenge, for these 3 reasons:1) It's worth more worth it2) It's easier to get away with it3) It's a better use for semenNote: When we put the semen or spit on the food, we mix it in or at least cover it up. Putting it on top flat out would result in Humiliation, more nagging by the rude party, and possible firing.=======================================================================================1) It's more worth itYou know how when your on a hike, you feel good if you climb a hill, right? I mean at least you accomplished something, right? Well, don't you feel even BETTER when you climb the entire f*ckin' mountain range?!?!?! Hell YEAH!!!!!! That's what it's like with spit VS semen. I mean, ANYONE can just spit on the whim. But if you jizz on someones meal?!?!?! Doing this makes you so pleased with yourself that you have done this, it's like looking down the mountain you just climbed and saying 'f*ck yeah, I JUST DID THAT." 2) It's easier to get away with it Since we're talking about waiters, that means they're handling food. When there is good food, there is bad food, and often waiter's eat the defects that shouldn't be served to people, but are still completely edible. So, that means they're mouth has pieces of food in it. So, when the waiters spit on the food, the people not only can taste your disgusting spit, but taste what YOU tasted, talk to your manager, and he would get you fired. Semen, on the other hand, tastes good (just ask Wallstreetathiest. He has convinced me and many other to use it as mouthwash) and the rude people will now ease off of you and actually be LESS rude. So, semen is better.3) It is a better use for semenOk, when men jizz, they do what, go all american pie and put it in a sock? Use tissues? Now, you can put it in a little cup/test tube, and pour it on when your boss or co-workers are looking when it happens. Now, jizz will no longer fill your socks or trash bag, but in the mouths of RUDE PEOPLE. How you like THEM apples?!?!I hand it over to Awesome-Sauce. We will do our rebuttles next round so we can argue against eachother the same amount to be fair.Thank you
Spit vs. Semen for Rude People's Food

TROLL DEBATE!!!cheesedingo1 and I have agreed to start a troll debate, just for fun. Votes shall be placed for whoever trolls the biggest and most successfully!This debate will be centered on rude customers at restauraunts. The debate is basically what should be done to an extremely rude customer's food by the restaurant worker? Should the food get a drizzling of drool or a squirt of baby-making juice?I, Pro, will be arguing for spit, while cheesedingo will be arguing for semen.1st round acceptanceLET THE TROLLING BEGIN!! :D
Police traffic details are a waste of tax payer money

Thank you for a great debate. I do have to mention that the link you made does not have the information you are talking about. I see basic information on deaths but there is not any information on construction zones or any of the state statistics. I will re post the link, I might be having trouble with it. http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov...... The statistics may be there but they are not where the link went. Most of the time a potentioal voter will not search real far into a link, if it is not right there or within a few clicks they may not investigate very far. I did do some "studying" of my own, so far I have not found any real statistics on this issue. I have found reports that have been conducted by various agency's that state the difference between the speed of motorists when police presence or flagmen are used. Well actually I have not found any statistics or even recommendations for flagmen. It seems some states are trying radar detectors and doubling fines to reduce speed in construction zone but the topic of flagmen is not brought up much. I did call three out of the four states you cited statistics for. Now, I do not expect these quotes and statements to stand as credible evidence, there is just a lack of digital info out there. I could not contact anybody at PDOT. TDOT. The women I spoke to said they use police presence on all interstate projects and they are working on using police presence on non-highway roads also. The women said they did not keep statistics on this issue. She did recommend to talk to N. Carolina, she believed they have been keeping records on injury's and deaths in construction zones. I am waiting for there report, I hope to receive it sometime next week. ODOT. The women I spoke to said they used police presence sometimes. Generally in very congested areas. She said they had not kept any statistics on this issue. MDOT. The gentleman I spoke to said they were in the earliest stages of the switch and had no real statistics at this time. If you can find the statistics in the FARS website and post direct links to the information that you stated it would be very helpful in voters deciding this debate. You have done a very good job, you are clear and you get your point across well. You have immaculate spelling and grammar. And you are polite and very courteous. I believe you will be a very good debater. I will gather the rest of the statistics that I can find and post them in the final round. I do apologize for not getting to this debate much sooner.
Police traffic details are a waste of tax payer money

I would also like to apologize for my delayed response. You bring up the issue of the effectiveness of a Police Officer versus the effectiveness of a Flagman. I will lead with my rebuttal and then follow with the statistics to back it up. I too have driven cross country on multiple occasions, but I spend the majority of my time driving in Massachusetts. Frequently, I will drive through a construction site and see the officer on detail with either a cell phone to his ear or iPod ear buds in both his ears. I would like to point out the fact that Massachusetts State Troopers doing a traffic detail for a state highway construction project are allowed to remain in their patrol car for the entire detail. When I drive by them more often than not they are asleep. I have also had the displeasure of driving by a State Trooper on a detail in the POV (carpool) lane after hours. When the POV lane is closed for the evening it is blocked off with Jersey barriers, preventing any traffic from entering. Also voiding the need for any type of detail. You argue that individuals will instinctively slow down at the sight of an Officer on detail. To which I ask these two questions: How long will these instinctual brake taps last when one continually witnesses the majority of Officers' willingness to neglect his duties? If an Officer is taking on a large work load with details and patrols, will he truly be effective at either? You argue that Flagmen are inept and would not be obeyed or receive the respect that one would provide for a Police Officer. Correct me if I am wrong but the definition of a Flagman is an individual other than a uniformed Police Officer who stops and/or directs traffic. In which case Massachusetts has employed "Flagmen" for years without any of the incidents which you described occurring in other states. A crossing guard is an individual other than a uniformed Police Officer that stops traffic. People do obey and respect them. You also argued that a Flagman's life would more likely be in jeopardy as opposed to that of a Police Officers on detail. I consulted the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) encyclopedia to provide the following statistics which completely contradict your argument. The national average for pedestrian and other non motorist fatalities in a construction zone was 2.64. The amount for Massachusetts who use police details was 2. The amounts for the following states who use flagmen were: Pennsylvania 2, Ohio 4, and Tennessee 1. These statistics can be found at . http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov...
Police traffic details are a waste of tax payer money

Massachusetts police officers are crying as of late due to the Governors decision to no longer require Police Officers to perform construction details in certain areas. We are now able to use flagmen. A few days ago a group of police officers began to harass a flagman who was directing traffic. There were also police officers in civilian cars who would deliberately disobey the directions of the flagman in an attempt to cause an accident. Most people claim that we will not save money from switching to flag men for it is utility companies that pay for the details not the tax payers. This is true and I may not see a decrease in my utility bill but do not forget that police details are also used for town construction projects which I as a property owner do pay for.
New Imperialism

I'm sorry I forfeited, something big in my life came up. I also was referring to the impact of the imperialism that happened, not if it was executed today. Long term effects- there were many, good and bad. Bad, cultures were damaged, natives were somewhat oppressed, and it caused many wars. Good, however; the overall well being, life expectancy, infant mortality, sickness levels, etc. were curbed quite a bit; schools, hospitals, and other public buildings were made; it opened many trade routes; education and technology improved majorly; tribal violence and supply shortages were stopped; combine all that, the countries were brought up to speed somewhat with the rest of the world. They may have not liked it, but looking now, they are better off.
New Imperialism

The USA cannot practice imperialism because it upsets the United Nations. If the USA starts imperialism, the UN can get mad, and we might risk upsetting Europe. Also, we can risk nuclear war. In the Middle East, there are a bunch of religious fanatics with weapons. If they get access to a nuclear weapon, and find out that that the USA is coming. We might risk nuclear war. If humanity is at risk, than we should not do it. This upsets humanity, and upsets the US.
An open debate.

My Friend, I have chosen the War on Terror as my choice of debate. Now since I am am making the opening argument, I know little of the details regarding your stance so I will simply state mine. First I want to distinguish between the War in Iraq and the War on Terror. There is a huge and often ignored difference between the War in Iraq and the War on Terror. The War in Iraq involves supposed WMDs and conflicts between Bush and Hussein. The War on Terror began as a result of 9/11 and is fought to prevent the growth of terrorist organizations. Both were started at different times, for different reasons, and have different goals and tasks. Both are very seperate wars. The reason I make this clarification is because I am and against the Iraq War, but pro War on Terror. It is my belief that the War on Terror is a righteous war, fought for good reason. Its objectives are noble, and its purpose is unimaginably important to our future generations. To begin I would like to give some statistics. Between the years of 1996 and 2001, the number of international incidents created at the hands of terrorists jumped from a 250 a year to and incredible 2,800. Over that five year period the number of international incidents increased eleven times over. Beteen those same five years, the number of casualties sustained annually grew from approx. 250 a year, to an incredible 4,500 terrorist related deaths. The number of casualties increased by 18 times!!! After the onset of the War on Terror, however, the number of international incidents dropped from 2,800 a year, back down to 250. The number of casualties dropped from 4,500, down to around 265. (statistics found at http://www.johnstonsarchive.net...) Behold the successes of the War on Terror. The War on terror is a successful war. Unlike the War in Iraq, we are, in fact, slowly achieving victory. If we were to end the War in Iraq, and focus more on the War on Terror, we could have Bin Laden. We could finally finish Al Qaeda. Destroying terrorist organizations is a noble cause. This is a war that DOES need to be fought I for one am going to support it 110%.
Uniform should be banned in australia

Since my opponent has forfeited two rounds I will keep this short and do a rebuttal to my opponent's opening argument that I haven't made before. In my opponent's opening statement they said that uniforms aren't casual clothes and therefore, aren't useful. However, in society people don't only wear casual clothes. There are formal occasions such as formal dinners where casual clothes wouldn't be appropriate. School and work is another place where casual clothes would be inappropriate as it's a work environment. You don't necessarily need to wear a uniform down the street daily for it to be a useful item of clothing. Also, uniforms bring all of the other benefits I mentioned in my previous argument like stopping bullying, identifying kids to stop them getting lost, and uniting students at that school. Overall, I think uniforms are still important in today's society and should not be banned in Australia or any other country.
Uniform should be banned in australia

Since my opponent forfeited the last round, I do not have a lot that I wish to say for this round. However, I would simply like to restate some of my main points and say why uniforms should continue in Australia and all other countries. Firstly, uniforms really do help to unite a school community. Someone you barely know who walks past you and has the same uniform makes you feel as if you have a common connection to them. It helps make people feel like they are involved in a special place. It makes them feel more comfortable in their daily environment because of this. Secondly it can help prevent bullying because of clothes. If everyone has the same clothes, there can be no bullying about who has better clothes. This can help people feel a lot better about themselves and focus more on their work if they're not getting bullied. Finally, if uniforms are made well, they can be comfortable. The cost isn't that expensive and it is definitely worth it for these three positive factors. Overall, school uniforms can help unite a community, stop bullying, and be made comfortable, and because of this uniforms should not be stopped. I look forward to seeing my opponent's rebuttals to my argument the next round and seeing their opinion on this subject matter.
Uniform should be banned in australia

The first problem with my opponent's debate is that they pointed out that uniforms can be bought for different seasons. This means that the student's wouldn't get sick. If they are made for different seasons and if they are designed well then there is not going to be any problem. As long as school's design their uniforms well, then there is no problem with that. Another one of my opponent's arguments is how much money school uniforms cost. However what their not considering is that many of the schools that wear school uniforms are private schools. The people who go to these schools have a lot of money, so school uniforms would be relatively inexpensive. Even if a family doesn't earn a lot of money and is required to buy a school uniform it's still worth the cost. Finally I'd like to discuss the advantages of school uniforms and say why it's worth that cost. School uniforms bring together the school as a community. They show that everyone is from that school, and it's a way of being brought together. It is very important for this, and it can indirectly make a community closer. Secondly it helps prevent bullying for clothes. There are about 3,892,000 bullies in the United States. One of the big reasons bullying occurs is because of clothes, and school uniforms help prevent this bullying. If a family doesn't earn that much, then they are likely not to be able to afford nice clothes and as a result be bullied. It's better to spend money on a school uniform than to get bullied every day that you walk into school. The final reason school uniforms are good are that on school trips it helps to identify people. If there is no uniform, there is a much greater chance that children could get lost especially when they are young. Overall uniforms are essential to unite a community, prevent bullying, and make sure children to get lost. Overall uniforms are necessary in Australia or any other country. They can be made to be comfortable, and often aren't that hard to afford for the families that require them. Also the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages as school uniforms could help prevent bullying, bring a community together, and stop children getting lost. This quote shows how the advantages really help improve the lives of students. A Middle School student in Hoover Middle School said, "The uniforms, in my opinion, are a good idea. They are very professional looking, they are cheaper than buying clothes every week and they show school spirit. This also means we don't have to worry much about how we look. I also think that uniforms have reduced peer problems. People have more friends that they wouldn't normally have because of the way they dress" (Hoover Middle School student). Overall school uniforms are a good idea in Australia and all countries and have many more advantages than disadvantages.
Uniform should be banned in australia

School uniforms should be abolished because they are impractical for modern-day society. For many years, school uniforms have been worn by students in schools throughout Australia. The problem of wearing school uniforms is that most school parents waste a lot of money purchasing them. Children of school age tend to grow very fast; this results in having to constantly replace uniforms. Additionally, the fabric used to make the uniforms can become quite uncomfortable and affect classroom concentration. School uniforms are not used as often as casual clothes in times like weekends, holidays and formal situations. One of the major causes of money wasting is from the purchasing of school uniforms. Uniforms cost a lot because the majority of parents have to buy a set of winter, summer and sport uniforms for their children. They also waste money when children grow older, thus making them have to buy new sets of uniforms every so often. In some cases, when a few children do not have any uniforms the right size for them, they have to get one especially made for them which makes the cost even higher. Uniforms can also be a problem when private schools purchase uniforms for their students; as a result the school may raise its fees for parents. A dilemma with uniforms is that often schools are unaware on how uncomfortable they are for students and its impact on the student's health. School uniforms are pretty uncomfortable when the weather or the seasons change, causing the student to be either too hot or too cold, therefore a handful of students will lose concentration in class. Also school uniforms harm the body when they are too cold or far too hot which results in sicknesses and absences. When a small proportion of students start to dislike their uniforms, they may abuse or destroy their own uniforms. One of the major problems of school uniforms is the lack of use of them. School uniforms are dissipating given that casual clothes are used more often as school uniforms. Almost everyone wouldn't wear uniforms on the streets, weekends, holidays or on formal times. Instead, a high percentage of people would wear casual clothes for these times. Subsequently, uniforms aren't as useful as casual clothes, meaning uniforms should be abolished. Alternate view: A problem with school uniforms is the rate on how comfortable they are. Uniforms are usually either too hot or too cold; as a result students will lose concentration during class, become sick or absent. In some cases, uniforms can be bought for different seasons or climates making it more comfortable and stress free.