which makes more sense ? islam(christianity)(judaism)(pro) vs atheism( con)

DISCLAIMERPro presented even more baseless assertions and logical fallacies, and went further to accuse me of things I haven't done. It seems to me that he is doing that in a desperate attempt to score some debate points. I will refute his accusations one by one in my refutation.REFUTATIONPro claims, "you even [1] changed the verse, you probably got the verse from some untrusted[sic] website, so you broke the rules, and [2] you even got this explanation probably from wiki so you broke the rules twice."1- Qur'anic verseThe translation I presented: "Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were of one piece, then We parted them..."The translation Pro presented: Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, then We separated them, and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?"Both "were one piece" and "were a joined entity" have exactly the same meaning. I don't see how I changed the meaning if my translation conveys the exact meaning. It seems Pro is unaware that the Qur'an is in Arabic and has many English translations.2- Explanation from Wiki?I didn't use any "fake-website" citation for my explanation, but simply the explanation that is obvious to me in my five year study of Islam. Pro has went too low in accusing me of using non-trusted "ghost" citations, when I simply stated my explanation of the verse.Big Bang miracle claimIn the Big Bang, the Earth was not even an entity and so Pro's explanation is false. The Big Bang is simply a starting point for the expansion of the universe which later resulted in the solar systems[1]. Moreover, I've shown that The Epic of Gilgamesh speaks also of a separation of the Earth and the Sky to describe how the Sky was separated from the ground. Pro has to present actual evidence that the Qur'an doesn't say that.Pro claims, "the torah before the quran which mentions the big bang..."Rebuttal: Where is your citation?Seven-skies miracle claimPro argues, "it doesn't mean skies like literally skies..."Rebuttal: Then saying that it speaks of the Big Bang and the solar systems is a classic example of committing the Texas Sharpshooter logical fallacy. I don't even get how the Big Bang is metaphorically a sky.Moon has borrowed light miracle-claimPro argues,"Abraham and his people were the first ones to discover that the moon has has a reflected light."Rebuttal: Pro did not bother to offer one citation. I've done the research and couldn't find anything about Abraham discovering that the moon had reflected light. The earliest account I found was of Thales, ”The moon is lighted from the sun[2].” And Thales didn't require divine foreknowledge to discover this, but he did so through common sense and experimentation.Sun's orbit miracle-claimPro dropped this argument.MY CASE AGAINST ISLAMPro has failed to prove why Islam "makes more sense" as he didn't offer good evidence or trusted citations. Moreover, there are many reasons to doubt if Islam actually makes sense.(1) From a Muslim perspective, an omniscient and omnipotent God failed three times and had to send three installments of divine foreknowledge to convince tiny dots, humans, to follow him.(2) The revelation of the Qur'an took 23 years, which doesn't make sense as God could have immediately sent down his Islamic scripture in a book so it won't be altered/manipulated through oral citations.(3) The Qur'an has many Surahs(chapters) that don't seem authentic, and it is nonsensical to have those in a book that is heaven-sent. A good example would be the short Surah, Surat Al-Masad, that personally attacks Abu Lahab and his wife, which is (a) out-of-place, (b) devoid of any moral lesson and (c) nothing more than a superfluous, personal rant.CITATIONS[1] Weinberg, S. (1993). The First Three Minutes: A Modern View Of The Origin Of The Universe. [2] Doxographi on Thales, Aet. ii. 1 ; Dox. 327. Online reference: http://history.hanover.edu....