Evolution vs Creationism

So, since I have already rebutted in the previous round, I will now present my argument. Why Creationism Beats Evolution There are many big holes in the theory of Evolution, that the Bible can even answer. For instance: A) Life from non-life: [1] These are just a few questions that prove Evolution has a major gap in their teachings. In parenthesis are the answers from the bible. How did life develop from non-life? (You can read the answers to this in the Book of Genesis, when god created all living things, such as creatures and Adam and Eve.) Where did the human emotions, such as love, hate and jealousy, come from? [1] ( You can read in Genesis that God gave Adam and Eve the right to rule over the earth and their own lives. We are created in God's image) Also in 2 Timothy Chpt1 Vs.7 "For God did not give us a spirit of timidity [of cowardice, of craven and cringing and fawning fear], but [He has given us a spirit] of power and of love and of calm and well-balanced mind and discipline and self-control”. What are the odds that the evolutionary process, proceeding by random changes, would produce human beings, plus millions of species of animals, birds, fish and insects, all with symmetrical features, i.e., one side being a mirror image of the other? We take symmetry in all these creatures for granted, but is that a reasonable outcome for a random process? Scientist still do NOT have any answers for the following questions, yet the bible can. As you can see, there are many answers here in the bible that evolutionist can't explain. The bible is the only book that can gives us these answers. This book was written way before scientist even began to make claims about how we, and the earth have evolved. B) Fossil Records Prove Evolution Wrong! [1] "One of the most powerful pieces of evidence against evolution is the fossil record. If evolution occurred by slow, minute changes in living creatures, there would be thousands of times more transitional forms of these creatures in the fossil beds than complete forms" Yet, all fossils formed are in complete form, which only leads to one conclusion...Evolution never occurred! "Though evolutionists have stated that there are many transitional forms, this is simply not true. What evolutionists claim to be transitional forms all have fully functional parts. A true transitional form would have non-functioning parts or appendages, such as the nub of a leg or wing." Again, there has not been any fossils re-discovered with transitional forms. Yet, the Bible can answer for Evolution...again "The Bible states in Genesis I that all creatures reproduce “after their kind” (no change to another kind, i.e., no transitional forms). So the complete absence of transitional forms in the fossil record supports creationism. Is this scientific evidence for creationism, or isn’t it?" A coincidence? I think not. C. Putting The Book of Genesis to the Test! For many years, people have disregard the thought of Genesis and how the earth was exactly made. But now, even NASA can even see that the teachings of how the earth was created is accurate! [2] In recent years however, some have challenged the account and say there is no scientific evidence to support Genesis. It appears now that discoveries made by NASA's scientist are confirming that the Genesis account is scientifically accurate" But the NASA "Spitzer Telescopes" have proved that the earth, in fact is the way it was prophesized about in the book of Genesis. "data from these two telescopes is revealing that planets like the Earth are formed in the exact same fashion as described at Genesis 1:2, 3. According to NASA, planets form inside a proto-planetary disc of dust and debris, starting out in a formless and chaotic state in total darkness, as describe in Genesis verse 2. "Now the earth proved to be formless and waste, and there was darkness upon the surface of the watery deep.... NASA's scientists have discovered that as the planets mature inside their dusty cocoon they suck up all the dust between them and the sun so that the planets slowly emerge from darkness into the light as described in Genesis verse 3. "Let light come to be...... After doing a two year study of the data put together by NASA scientist from these two telescopes, Hutchins says he was astonished to learn how accurately this scientific data lined up with the simple description of planet formation recorded in Genesis." As you can read, even NASA scientist have agreed that the book of Genesis is correct. It is the closest thing that has ever been prophesized about the earth. What is the excuse for this? That it's just a coincidence that our Earth is so dramatically correct to the book of Genesis which was written more then likely between 1440 and 1400. There is no coincidence or excuse for this. Finally...I will give you one more reason as to why Evolution is wrong.. D. Species Without a Link Proves Evolution is Wrong Many Anthropologist claim that there are many missing links. Yet, scientist are lacking scientific proof that we actually came from certain species such as Apes. [3]There are hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Petrified skulls and bones exist from these creatures..... Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture." So...we have pictures like this that supposedly show our time line: But yet, there are many missing links. They make up species, put them in a picture and tell us this is how we evolved. Yet, there are humungous puzzle pieces missing, scientist choose to ignore those pieces, and put together other pieces that are just easier. As you can see, there are so many missing puzzle pieces from Evolution theory, and yet the bible, has so many of theese awnsers, this means Creationism has to be true. Sources: [1] http://creationtoday.org... [2] http://www.christiannewswire.com... [3] http://www.abovetopsecret.com...