Quantum Physics is False

Thanks you poor poor man for accepting because you will certainly be owned. Argument 1 Quantum Mechanics is contradictory When someone say "prove quantum mechanics false" We must ask which one? The copenhagen is the most popular but all are just as good as the other. So there's many contradictory interpretations of quantum physics all are under quantum physics. Some say QP is determanistic some are indertermanistic both are quantum physics. This means QP Is self contradictory and false. 2. Quantum wave particle dulity vs logic. Many wave functions are interpreted to be both particles and waves. This is assuming an invalid false philological view point, that the laws of logic are non existent. This is contradicting reality. Its like saying a square circle exists. But in no possible world can that be possible, therefore quantum physics is false in every possible world! 3. Uncertianty principle Another contradictory principle is the uncertainty principle. Its nature is contradictory. we're so certian that were uncertian. That can't be true. How are you certian about uncertianty, that would be certian...contradicting uncertianty. If you know where a particle is you will know how fast its going. The whole principle is nonsensical. If you dont know how fast its going you can't know where it is! Null and void. 4. Imaginary Time. Apart of quantum physics is imaginary numbers and imaginary time. None of these things exist in reaility because their imaginary. Nor have they shown they exist. Since this is true, QP doesn't discribe reality. This concept kind of shoots itself in the foot, so I don"t need to spend much time on it. Using an imaginary number in an equation is like intentionally using a false premise in an argument, which is of course totally inappropriate in scholarship. In fact, the man who invented Imaginary Numbers was an ophthalmologist named Renes Descartes. He coined the term. And guess what. It was in a criticism of the idea. Orwell would have a field day. Imaginary objects have never been measured or proven to exist. Whats next imaginary root beer? Are physicists going to say we can all live off imaginary food and water? What has science come to? 5. subatomic what? Scientists believe in fairies; they call them electrons. That"s just a language game, and we all know what Wittgenstein uncontroversially proved about language games. Supposedly there are these magical little floating things and here are their essential properties: 1) We can"t see them 2) They hold everything together That sounds to me a lot like fairies. And you might say, "Well, there are different types. Protons, electrons, etc. etc. quarks whatever." So the fairy creatures come in different races, so what? Now I"m not one to doubt the existence of fairies. Frankly I see no evidence of their non-existence and you can"t prove a negative. But let"s stop teaching that there is anything scientific about them. No one has ever even seen one, and noted anthropologist Sam Harris has explained that this is the key feature of myth. The subatomic world (actually Latin for "below the earth" " and where do fairies live exactly? yep.) is false as traditionally explained. And the diagrams shown to children are simply outrageous. Qp is fail