THB: free will does not exist

The only way to dismiss the claim "free will does not exist" is to convincingly argue the claim "free will does exist".Incorrect. You are saying Free Will does not exist, and there is no other option. I simply have to show that you cannot logically make such a claim.However, this is not the case, as the default is disbeliefThis is simply untrue. The default is not always disbelief. It is not up to me to prove that the Earth is round, it is up to anyone who objects to prove that the Earth is not round. It is not up to me to prove that 2 + 2 = 4, it is up to anyone who objects to prove that 2 + 2 ≠ 4. If a claim is being made which goes against the status quo, or common belief of the day, it is up to the one who rejects this claim to prove it. If the default was disbelief, how have you proven logic exists? How have you proven you yourself exist? It seems clear you paid no attention to my sources which backed up my point, yet boast your opinion as fact. Very interesting.[P1] - It is up to you to prove that over 75% of the world is wrong about there being a soul. You cannot simply say 'There is no such thing as a soul, everyone is wrong but me, therefore there is no Free Will.' That is irresponsibly logic. My opponent has in no way shown the idea of a soul to be illegitimate. Several religions, with their own individual proofs, have brought up the idea and provided evidence for the idea of a soul and Free Will. My opponent has no addressed any of their claims or evidence, but just ruled them all out. Slopy Science.[P2] - My opponent has presupposed that the brain is simply physical, while providing no evidence of such. One would only believe the brain is purely natural if he were to presuppose a Naturalistic worldview. P2 remains unfounded.[P3, 4] The simple fact of the matter is there is nothing stopping me from eating a bannana versus an apple this afternoon. I could even eat nothing today if I so chose. My free will is limited in that I don't have any cookies here, but to say that is evidence we don't have free will is to confuse free will with omnipotent will. Just because we want something doesn't mean it will automatically be given to us, but we do have the power to choose.Con is appealing to naive intuition...How are the results of our decisions predetermined? This has not been shown by you. If I shoot someone, the result of him dying will occur. The response by others is not predetermined. There is no set result of this person dying, outside of the fact that he is dead. How is decision making not free will? We make decisions based on the choices available to us. Therefore we at least have the free will to make decisions.How are our emotions predetermined by factors outside of our control? I can chose to alter my emotions either by means of willpower of medical assistance. I can chose to train my emotions to feel and act how I please. I have the free will to shape and form my emotions as well as whether or not to listen to them.The BOP is not on whoever challenges the status quo, but on the positive claim-My opponent has not provided any evidence of this claim, only his opinion. I provided sources before, and I'll provide three again. (12; 13; 14) ...most people worldwide are not Christians, for example.Fact of the matter is that no one doubts the existance of Free Will. Hundreds have builts religions and worldviews defending it. You must refute them with fact, not presume you're right and then use that to win.My opponent is using circular reasoning, and therefore has an irrelevant case. He continues to assume the lack of an omnipotent will equals the lack of a free will. This simply isn't true. It takes free will to Review and Submit this debate.(12) - https://en.wikipedia.org...(philosophy)(13) - https://www.cambridge.org...(14) - https://link.springer.com...