Great Truth Claim of Baha'u'llah (Baha'i Order)

Pro has not adequately defended his premises, however even I was to grant:P1P2P3P4and P5,It is should be the case that by granting all his premises I should loose, but it's not because his argument is not logically sound.His argument does not establish that Baha'u'llah is god. It would merely establish that Baha'ullah claimed to be god and some people believe him.C1: It Does Not Seem To Be The Case That Baha'u'llah Claims He Is God.Quotes from Baha'u'llah in which he seems to not refer to god as himself:"All-praise to the unity of God, and all-honor to Him, the sovereign Lord, the incomparable and all-glorious Ruler of the universe, Who, out of utter nothingness, hath created the reality of all things, Who, from naught, hath brought into being the most refined and subtle elements of His creation, and Who, rescuing His creatures from the abasement of remoteness and the perils of ultimate extinction, hath received them into His kingdom of incorruptible glory. Nothing short of His all-encompassing grace, His all-pervading mercy, could have possibly achieved it.""How wondrous is the unity of the Living, the Ever-Abiding God--a unity which is exalted above all limitations, that transcendeth the comprehension of all created things.... How lofty hath been His incorruptible Essence, how completely independent of the knowledge of all created things, and how immensely exalted will it remain above the praise of all the inhabitants of the heavens and the earth!3"Baha'u'llah does not seem to be talking about himself in these quoutes.C2:Baha'u'llah's god is incoherent.The Bahá'í Website defines god as follows:"The Bahá'í belief in one God means that the universe and all creatures and forces within it have been created by a single supernatural Being. This Being, Whom we call God, has absolute control over His creation (omnipotence) as well as perfect and complete knowledge of it (omniscience). Although we may have different concepts of God's nature, although we may pray to Him in different languages and call Him by different names--Allah or Yahweh, God or Brahma--nevertheless, we are speaking about the same unique Being."C2b: Omnipotence is impossible: P1)If God exists, then God is omnipotentP2) It should be the case that there is nothing that god can't doP3) There is something that god can't doC1) God does not existsP1 is true by definition.P2 is a derivation of P1P3) Is a contentious point, that if true shall negate P2C1 necessarily follows from the premises.Defense of P3 via syllogism:P1) An omnippotent being can create an object it can't lift.P2) If an omnipotent being can create an object it can't lift, it can't lift the object, thus it isn't omnipotentP3) If it can't create an object it can't lift, then it is not omnipotent.C4) Omnipotence is impossible.C2c: True Omniscience is impossible:God can't know if he was created with perceived omniscience.C3: Many People Don't Hold Him As That Ideal: 1.Christian 33.39% (of which Roman Catholic 16.85%, Protestant 6.15%, Orthodox 3.96%, Anglican 1.26%), 2.Muslim 22.74%3.Hindu 13.8%4.Buddhist 6.77%5.Sikh 0.35% 6.Jewish 0.22%, 7.Baha'i 0.11% I would advice pro not to argue Ad Populum, because he will convincingly loose.C4: Belief Does Not Equal Truth:Pro says:" Baha'u'llah's claims is true (at least for those who believe him "The proposition X is true, is true to those who believe X is true.The negation of X is true, to those who don't believe proposition X is true.By law of excluded middle X or it's negation is true. Just because someone believes something does not make it true.It means nothing.Conclusion:1. P3 seems to be false2. P5 seems to be false 3. C is a non-sequitur4. The argument does not establish the truth of any claims, merely that someone made a claim and some believe the claimSources:[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://www.bahai.org...[3] http://info.bahai.org...