Convert me to Christianity

My opponent makes a valid point that Paul may have been guilty. However, let's look at the facts. We know that Paul was traveling with other people. When Paul had his experience, a bright light surrounded him. Was it the sun? No, it could not have been because the others with Paul saw the light themselves. The men with Paul actually could hear the voice talking to Paul! The only difference is that they could not see the figure that Paul saw. Is that proof against Paul? No, that just means that the message was meant just for Paul and no one else. Besides, how is it that when Paul visited Ananias (Like God told him to), Paul could magically see again? And here is some food for thought, couldn't have God made Paul suffer from these delusions because God wanted him to preach? I don't see why not. I agree, charisma is not proof of divinity. However, this man turned the lives of these people literally upside down. You can argue that those figures did basically the same thing, but again, we need to look at this time period. John the Baptist was very charismatic, yet not too many people called him the Messiah. Again, I am not saying that Jesus had these people under some sort of magic spell forcing them to follow him, what I am saying is that there must be something about this man to do something as bold as he did. I think it is a fair argument that Jesus did more than those men listed (and considering all but one of the men listed ran around killing people). Besides, why would Jesus die for a lie and bring thousands of others down with him? (Considering Jesus was only 33 when he died) My opponent says, "My opponent states that, "If a man who did miracles like Jesus did and said things that Jesus did, there is no denying that the majority of the population would follow this man." However this is not what happened. He remained a minority cult figure." I'm sorry if anyone got this out of context, but I meant that if anyone who did what Jesus did today would have a majority of the population following him. There's just no denying that. My opponent says, "However, had the Romans witness the miracles of Jesus, and they should have done being present at the time, they would have converted to Christianity. The Romans frequently adopted foreign Gods. The Romans indeed received religious revelation telling them to adopt the worship of Cybele, a cult that they found most odious. The sight of Jesus performing miracles would have caused them to convert, however strange their found Judaic monotheism to be. The fact they did not leads us to the conclusion that these miracles did not even occur." Some Romans did convert, and I'm sure a lot more converted than we know of. However, you have to remember this time period. If one Roman soldier spoke out, he would immediately be killed. I'd bet many Roman citizens did convert, but they just thought they were the only ones. Therefore, they would have been afraid to ban together for quite some time. I think my opponent does not understand what I am trying to say about Luke. Luke's case was not the case of Paul, Mohammad, or even David Icke. Luke ran around the world talking to witnesses and trying to put a true story together; his experience wasn't just a moment or 3 days long. It took Luke about 30 to put this book together. In the book of Luke, we see what Luke found to be the 100% truth about Jesus. Anyone can argue about Constantine all day long. If someone asked me who I think an ideal Christian was (except Jesus), I would not put Constantine on the top of my list. Constantine simply knew that Christianity had to be the true religion because he chose that instead of Judaism or Paganism to hold the Empire together. My opponent states, "No, by the time of Constantine the Empire was clearly in decline. Shortly before the ascent of Constantine the Empire had endured decades of internal civil war and invasion." It is true that the Roman Empire had been enduring these things. However, things like invasion and civil war happened in every age of the Roman Empire. Just look at the United States, for example. This country has endured civil war and invasion, but it still has stayed together. At any rate, my opponent's point would be valid, except for the point that the Empire fell more than a hundred years later in 496. The last remnants of the Empire were finally wiped out in the 15th century. In the case of Mohammad, Jesus never mentioned that there would be more prophets. However, Jesus did mention "false prophets." Looking at it from another perspective, Surah 47:4 says: "Therefore, when you meet the unbelievers, smite at their necks.." (I didn't take it out of context, the rest is just talking about how the Muslims will be rewarded for their actions.) I don't know about you, but that seems to be the opposite of what Jesus taught! Besides, any religion that does not shun violence cannot be proof of a true, all loving God. David Icke was first told by a psychic that he would be a great healer who brought great controversy. That alone in the eyes of most of the world is laughable. Icke traveled to some graveyard and he held his arms up and started shaking around. Literally. It's possible he may have had a seizure (that's just as plausible that Paul had a dream or mirage of sorts). Again, from a Christian perspective, Jesus only said there would be false prophets, not any more real ones. One more thing I might add is that most scholar's agree that Jesus's tomb was empty! I find it hard to believe that a bunch of fisherman killed well trained, elite Roman soldiers, and moved a 3,500 pound boulder and stole Jesus's body. Since most scholars agree the tomb was empty, the Christian community must ask where the body of Jesus is or definite proof that it was taken if there was no resurrection. My final point is that Christianity is very much different from other religions. When the Buddha died, he said, "I am still searching for the truth." Muhammad said, "I am a prophet of the truth." The Vedas (holy writings of the Hindus) say, "Truth is like an elusive butterfly, none will be able to catch it." And then you have this Jesus guy that says, "I am the truth!" That revolutionizes religion! I am proud to have given my life to this guy who is the truth, and I love Him with all my heart, soul, and strength.