Dead children are still sexy

Thanks for the debate, Pro. The opposite of thanks for being a vile human being. To my usual readers, Sorry; this one's pretty bad. I have no problems refuting the resolution though. Since Pro failed to supply definitions, I will; opt-In voting standards apply. Definitionsdead - no longer alive. . https://en. Oxforddictionaries. Com/definition/deadchildren - young human beings below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority. . https://en. Oxforddictionaries. Com/definition/childstill - up to and including the present time; even now as formerly. . https://en. Oxforddictionaries. Com/definition/stillsexy - sexually attractive or exciting. . https://en. Oxforddictionaries. Com/definition/sexy*Resolution*It was Pro's burden to affirm that young human beings below the age of puberty/legal age of majority who are no longer alive are and have been, Up to and including the present time, Sexually attractive. *Refuting Pro*Pro recounts:"A 5 year-old girl got hit by a carShe died on a spotI asked for her parentsTo give me her body so I could have sex with her"My response:While Pro may himself have some penchant for freshly deceased cadavers, This doesn't indicate any reason why dead humans, Let alone dead children, Should be considered sexy. Like, I get Pro's trying to shock and awe, But they're neglecting their burden in the process with a silly anecdote. Also, Even though Pro claims that they requested a dead body for sex, Not all potential or actual sexual interactions involve sexual attraction, In fact it could be that Pro requested the body for sex as a display of power and dominance rather than an expression of sexual attraction, Which wouldn't indicate any sexiness on the part of the cadaver. Pro laments:"They refusedThey called me a monsterThey have another daughterWho is alive. . . Do they want me to have sex with her instead"My response:So the reason why dead children are sexy, According to Pro, Is that the parents of a dead girl called Pro a monster? Again this doesn't speak to anything being sexy, And it should be obvious that by the parents disallowing Pro's necrophilia for one daughter it doesn't default to the parents desiring Pro to have sex with their other daughter who is still living. Furthermore, A living daughter's sexiness would be irrelevant to the resolution and readers should dismiss Pro's obvious red herring. Pro explains:"Your daughter is dead, She cannot feel painWhen we have sex, She won't mindAnd I will like it a lotSo I won't have to have sex with children that are still alive"My response:So Pro attempts to make an appeal to consequences claiming that by allowing full copulation with the dead child, Pro's potential future pedophilia acts on living children could be suppressed and that this particular act of copulation Pro would "like it a lot. "This appeal to consequences does not indicate any sexiness on the part of the dead human and while it seemingly could reduce more of Pro's misbehavior, Pro has not indicated any limit to his urge to dominate dead children's bodies to display power and obtain control, So, Along with being a fallacy, Pro's argument here that "a dead girl in time saves nine" is also unsound. Pro begs:"Please think of the childrenChildren who are aliveIf you give me a dead childI will be satisfied, I won't go for children that are still alive"My response:Neither thinking of the children who are alive nor the condition of giving Pro a dead child would indicate that dead children are sexy, Pro's central burden. Pro seems to be more fixated on safeguarding future living children from his pedophilia than showing why or how we can accept that dead children were once sexy and remain as such while deceased. Pro grovels:"So I beg you, Please think of the childrenBe the good parents and give me your deceased daughterShe didn't have sex during her lifeLet her have sex during the death"My response:Aside from substantivizing death in some poetic fit, Pro attempts to show sexiness on the part of deceased children by claiming that if the cadaver Pro requested were ultimately sexed up by Pro this would render the parents "good parents. "The problem is that even if this were to make the parents good, It wouldn't show that dead children are sexy. Oh, And it should be obvious that raping a cadaver isn't some consolation prize for never having sex while alive. I mean it's not like the dead children are asking for "rape-arations" or anything. *Conclusion (poem)*Pro tried to offend, And I think I know why, He can't demonstrate sexy dead children, It's like he didn't even try. This topic is awful, And Con should win, While necrophilia is unlawful, Pro didn't show sexy dead children. Pro only attemptedTo shock and awe, His motives were preempted, His arguments shredded like coleslaw. Pro's a crappy debater, It's observably true, Pro's a snuff porn masturbaterAnd a vile human too. F*ck you Pro. You deserve to be raped, Shot with a crossbow, While it's all video taped. Until you are dead, Like your sexual muses, Skullf*cked in the head, Until there are visible bruises. Your dead body should be left, For several hundred men, With massive phallic heft, To rape you over and over and over again. So readers take note, Pro cannot win, Despite all the crap he wrote, He never showed sexy dead children. Now that Pro's been berated, The resolution has been negated.