Nintendo Wii U Is Better Than Xbox One

Thank you for your arguments, I shall now respond. "I will allow the use of mentioning the PlayStation 4, PlayStation 3, Xbox One, Xbox 360, Nintendo Wii U, Nintendo Wii, and (maybe) PC. There, now you will no longer have to complain; this is my debate, so you must follow these rules. " My opponent fails to mention this in his introduction when I agreed to the debate, then decides to use this reasoning in later arguments to prove his point, and feels free to "penalize me" for it. I feel that this should be considered invalid as my opponent did not state this clearly at the beginning of the debate. This is not the debate I agreed to, therefore, I feel no "need" to follow these rules. Such arguments by my opponent to further validate this claim are "if opponent continues to infringe on the rules, then this debate will be discontinued automatically for misconduct", "if you do not agree with the above rules, then you may leave this debate now as this is my debate and not yours", and then tells me not to debate him on topics that are part of a debate. I feel this is repulsive communication and conduct by my opponent. Opponent further states that this is "my debate, not yours", but I find this to be not the case. WE are debating a subject, WE are sharing our resources, WE are making arguments against each other. Opponent simply started the debate. If he wanted these "rules" in place, he should have mentioned them at the start of the debate. So feel free to "penalize me" for following rules that were not stated at the beginning of the debate, as they should have been. Again, very poor communication and conduct. "Yes, I am telling you to compare the graphics of Wii U exclusives to that of third party ports on Xbox One. They are both different systems of different graphics, and the point of this debate is to prove how one is better than the other. " But the true way to compare two things such as these is to compare a game that runs on both consoles and see how it looks on each. While opponent feels the games look "better" on the Wii U, this is entirely subject to opinion, as I could very well say I feel exclusive games look "better" on the Xbox One, at that would be just as relevant as this argument is. People have different opinions on consoles and their games. He even states that Xbox One games can run at a superior quality than that of the Wii U's (4K UHD). So opponent helps my argument out a little bit by stating that the capabilities are in fact better in terms of quality on the One. If you were to fully compare the differences between the Wii U and Xbox One's graphical capabilities, then you should compare a game that appears on both systems. That way, you can get a fair judgment as to each of their capabilities. And, in addition, opponent explicitly states at the beginning that he feels the graphics are better on the Xbox One, "far superior", even. "Opponent is now being irrelevant to the debate by bringing in a feature (HDMI-In) that is not relevant to both the Wii U and the Xbox One. " HDMI-In is a feature available to the Xbox One and not the Wii U. How is it not relevant? As well, opponent states that some functions (changing to a TV remote, off-screen play, etc. ) is something the "Xbox can never do". This by itself shows a narrow mindset. The opponent refuses to believe that anything can be made across the years that could have a similar function as the current Wii U gamepad. If the Xbox One has lived its full life and has not had this tool made for it, opponent could use this as a valid argument. However, this is not the case. The lifespan of the One is just beginning, and has been out for less than a year. I state in the OS argument that the Xbox One's OS is similar to that of the 360's, which is a good thing because it was renowned for its simplicity. Opponent then argues it's too similar to his Windows 8 machine, and I stated that since it is indeed similar, then it's a benefit for all users for W8. Opponent then argues about users who use W7 or Mac OSX. If they are used to the 360 layout, converting should be no problem. However, if they aren't, then they will find getting used to the One's interface is very easy due to its simplicity and easiness to use, as well as seamless transitioning from app to app, and two apps running at once (an example can be a game and Skype). I never stated that "the Xbox One GUI is completely different than the 360 by having a Windows 8 OS", I just merely stated the two were similar. Feel free to check. ". .. and then state that the Wiimote is not suited for competitive gaming - not because it is bulky, but too small. " I never stated that people don't prefer the Wiimote because it is too small. I simply stated that "it is a 'luxury' for casual gamers" (my exact quote, feel free to check, again), and I also stated "There's a reason most people don't use the default Wii controller for competitive gameplay". Opponent feels free to twist my saying to his own desires to prove his point once more. As well, one could be very skilled with the Wiimote or the Gamepad, as opponent mentions. However, players have the potential to perform better with controllers like the GameCube controller or the Classic Pro controller, as well as other joystick-themed controller styles, such as the Xbox One's. That's why many pro competitive players use these style controllers, even with the other options available to them. "Correct, the control sticks and d-pad are not entirely based off of the latter companies, but it seems to closely resemble them to the point that Nintendo and Sony can sue Microsoft if they please. " Opponent feels free to make this argument, but then later self-contradicts, stating "Opponent may argue that this benefits the controller and consumers as it is familiar to them, but the features (as claimed by opponent) do not resemble closely enough to be that familiar. " So the features of the controller are familiar enough to be suable, but not familiar enough for the people playing them to notice? "Some adjustments have been made, but not nearly enough to be extremely different from the Xbox 360; this will confuse gamers to assume that Microsoft has not changed and will be angry for feeling betrayed - sad, but it will decrease the customer satisfaction which has been declining since the Xbox 360 which will increase sales and liking for Sony. " Two problems: A. Opponent brings in other systems and their companies (again). .. B. Opponent fails to mention that with the Sony systems (PS), they had essentially the same controller for many, MANY years (almost 20! ), starting from the original PlayStation! The controller has only been modified to a severe degree just recently, from the PS3 to the PS4, as opposed to Xbox, who, with each console have modified their controller to at least some major extent. As well, as I stated in my last argument, it seems stupid for Sony to sue for the joysticks, as the Xbox One's are concave, while the PS4's are convex. Opponent, again, shows ignorance. "While the Xbox One certainly has such streaming capabilities, one must remember that the Wii U was meant to compete with the PS3 and Xbox 360, and not with the PS4 and Xbox One. " The Wii U is, by technicality, considered an "eighth generation gaming system", directly competing with the PS4 and Xbox One. Opponent also mentions Miiverse to allow recording and sharing of gameplay, which can also apply to the Xbox One, as it has a similar function. Sources: . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://en.wikipedia.org... Looking forward to round 5.