ABM is a positive movement in DDO

Cosmo makes an odd claim that I dropped his argument, which is blatantly false. I very explicitly explained that 1) ABM stuff isn't funny (unless cosmo thinks raping black people, enslaving them, making black rape victims prostitutes, enslaving Jews, making black people run on hamster wheels, etc. is hilarious comedy material) and that 2) allowing them to post normalizes and defines ABM material as racism and distracts from more modern forms of racism, which is detrimental to the advancement of society. He very cleanly dropped these arguments, so do allow him to bring up points against these later. These demonstrate that 1) Cosmo is incorrect because ABM posts and debates have no discursive value on this website and 2) the impact of these posts is detrimental to minorities. Moreover, ABM has actually explicitly stated that its goal is to drive black people off of DDO, further reducing diversity on this website. This was admitted by Masterful and What50 in this forum post: http://www.debate.org.... In the same forum post, they admit to making a hit list for black members of the website and that they wanted to drive these black members off the web site. I gave evidence from the ToS that a) Racism and b) Spam are not permitted on this website. Cosmo admits that the leader admitted that their members made nasty troll debates that were inappropriate for their site but claims that the leader did not say he did this, so this is a moot point. He also claims that the group was not made for that purpose. I have two responses: 1) It doesn't matter why the group was created; the fact is that regardless of what the original intent of the group was, they still violated the terms of service by posting racist debates and spamming. If a group of friends gets together to play Dungeons and Dragons and they then go out and rob a bank, the original purpose is immaterial. They still should be punished for their behavior regardless of what the original intent was. 2) Master himself was responsible for similar behavior; his own signature says that white people are the master race and black people have "s.h.i.t" on their face. That's a prime example of trolling. He further admits that he himself "got carried away" and behaved inappropriately. He then claims I gave no other evidence that these debates were racist or spam. I think that's self evidently false. Debates entitled "Jews should be forced to work in the mines" and "black women who are raped should be forced to work in the sex industry" are nothing short of racist spam. But even if you don't take my word for it, take airmax's word for it. Airmax is the moderator, and he banned several members of ABM and removed the vast majority of their posts. He also explicitly said that these were children who were spamming. I don't need to provide any more evidence than this. The moderator deemed their posts as spam and said they were a violation of the terms of service. His final argument is that we need to be the bigger person, but I think Cosmo really doesn't understand what this means. He has failed to justify why allowing children to troll, spam, and perform their stated function (that they themselves have admitted!) of driving black people off of this website is desirable. Why is allowing them to run amok and do as they please the "bigger thing to do" instead of defending minorities from this triggering and nasty behavior? More importantly, he has failed to prove that they are a force for good, which is the resolution of this debate. This debate is not "should we let them do as they please". It's about whether or not this racist group of trolling children is a good force on debate.org. Cosmo has utterly failed to prove this.