Allah exists without a place according to correct Islamic belief

"Allah exists without a place according to correct Islamic belief" Actually, I am arguing that Allah does not exist without a place, which means I can argue that Allah does not exist. The reason I can do this is becuase "Con" means against, so I do not have to be a Muslim to argue against this topic.Pro has failed to provide any sources or arguments for his case in the second round, instead choosing to a use improper capitalisations to highlight his beliefs, so I will touch base on what umar99 wrote last round and the round before for a moment. "I ask for the opponent to be Sunni Muslim, well if they hold this belief then they would be Wahhabi/Salafi and not Sunni in reality. The reason I ask for this is so that the sources used are accepted and time is not wasted on the validity of sources as has happened in a previous debate." Umar asked his opponent to be a Sunni Muslim, which I certainly am not. The problem he does not see is, is that he asked, or requested this, he did not require it. Which means that I can argue in this debate, specifically against the existence of Allah without a place, without being a Sunni Muslim. This means that, although I am against Pro, I do not have to believe that Allah exists with a place, but simply that he does not. He provides a reason, I applaud him, but his reason is flawed. Using only Islamic sources...? Since that is a request as well, I will deny it and argue with scientific sources. "As a member of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamah I believe Allah exists without a place and that Islamic sources agree with my belief. I have several problems here. For one, he is using solely Islamic to express his belief. If I believed in the bible, and I said: "Noah built a boat and sailed in it with 10000 animals, the bible agrees with my belief!"... That would be illogical and immediately dismissed. Which means I am going to dismiss this, as there is no evidence that Islamic sources are scientifically accurate. "I strongly abhor the wahhabi, pseudo-Salafi and anthropomorphist beliefs about Allah of which is one of their most important beliefs and they say that Allah has a place LITERALLY above the throne. These people are victims of Literalism and need to understand the existence of metaphors in Islamic texts." Wait, can't we say that this is a metaphor? You can't say this, as anything can be a metaphor, including the whole entire source! If the book specifically does not mention it is a metaphor, then it is not a metaphor. This strengthens my point, as now everything in the Quran can be a metaphor, including Allah, and his place, as there is no clear consensus as to what is and what isn't a metaphor in the Quran. "I shall be bringing evidence from the Quran and Sunnah and from the classical Islamic scholars." I will quickly refute said evidence. "As you can see my opponent has not grasped the nature of this debate and has mistakenly understood this to be a debate about the existence of Allah/God which it clearly is NOT. What the debate IS about is WHAT THE CORRECT ISLAMIC BELIEF is about Allah. I thought I had made this clear for all yet there had to be someone who failed to comprehend such a basic request." Correct: free from error; in accordance with fact or truth. The Quran is not based off of facts or truths, it is based off of beliefs. I can believe in anything, and it does not have to be factual or truthful. Now....the title of the debate, and the reason I am against it. "Allah exists without a place according to correct Islamic belief" There is no correct islamic belief, as the Quran is not based off of scientific fact, as it believes in an Omnipotent being that created the universe, which, although I am not proving that it wasn't, there is exactly no proof that it was. Because of this, I will be arguing that I am against Allah existing without a place, but not for Allah existing. Because of this, I will use evidence to prove that the Quran is not factual. "By the sun and his brightness, And the moon when she followeth him" This is a quote taken from an Islamic text. Since I cannot prove that it is not a metaphor, as anything in Islamic belief could be a metaphor, according to Umar 99 " These people are victims of Literalism and need to understand the existence of metaphors in Islamic texts." Then anything I can gleam from the Quran ( Or any Islamic text, for that matter) could be a metaphor, correct, as there is no fine line between a metaphor and a fact. If Umar99 can scientifically provide evidence as to the Quran being factual, then we can accept it as fact. This is a truly impossible feat, and I wish Umar99 good luck in the next round. “The Islamic view of the Christian Bible is based on the belief that parts of Bible are a revelation from God, however some of that has become distorted or corrupted (tahrif)” https://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.livescience.com... http://www.1000mistakes.com... http://www.deism.com... https://danielmiessler.com...