social security should b means tested against the rich

On your First Paragraph, you say I failed at giving you a Moral argument, which I have given repeatedly over and over again. Did I not say that the Bible says "You Reap what you Sow"? at what point do you believe that you have a Right to have someone Else's money, just because they have more than you?No, my friend. If you want a lesson in Morality, I suppose I am obliged to give it. The Scriptures sayeth "Thou shall reap what Thou hath Sown"The Scriptures sayeth "Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's property"The Scriptures sayeth "Thou shall not envy"The Scriptures sayeth "He who doth not work shall not have meate"You have made the fallacy of bringing morality into politics. Not only this but you completely dis-regard my previous point, which stated that the Wealthy paid for 70% of the U.S. Income Tax. You say the Poor are being taxed? take another 15-20% away for the Middle class, and the Poor are paying at most 1/10 of the Federal Income Tax.You also seem to say "Taking from the Excess" quite often. I want a legitimate answer. By this do you mean Taking from the Rich, who are supposed to be secure in their Personal belongings, according to the constitution?You are not clearly defining "The Rich". "Rich" is a perspective. Saying "The Rich" own 90% of the land is an incomplete statement. Add a clear definition for who "the Rich" are, and where the 90% of land they own is Located.According to theguardian.com (Link is at the Bottom), the lower 90% of America own roughly 22% of the Wealth. You included no Sources for you 90% statistic, and therefore must be dis-regarded as false, or a straight out lie.Next you claim that the Rich do not work hard. Then I may ask, how can you get rich without working hard? The only way is the Lottery. Take it from me, Someone who works for an American in the top 10% of Society. He is 79. He is not retired. He owns a business which he operates personally 4 hours a day. He owns a farm, which he works every day with his workers. He owns buildings for rent, which he personally cleans up every week. He attends ALL company board meetings, ALL sales applicants, ALL future employees, and he still manages to find time to help his wife do chores around the house. So how can you claim that these people do lesser work than someone who is in the Office for 7 Hours, and then goes home and rests. This man at the age of 79 spends 9 Hours a day doing work to retain his wealth.Moving on to the ANALOGY I gave. Notice I Capitalized ANALOGY. I am not a Dolt. I know you are not rich with 10 Dollars. It was an ANALOGY to put things in perspective. And By the way, Yes I can Morally argue it is Alright to have one person with a Million, and 9 others with 10,000 Dollars. The One with a Million came up with a Good Idea, or business, and the Others Work for him OR the ones with 10,000 are Lazy Dolts who do not work. Whether it is McDonald's, or the Military, proper Work is ALWAYS open.WE FINALLY AGREE! It is exactly my point we need to fund the government and Defense! The Problem is that the Rich already pay 70% of the Taxes going into areas like defense.Social Security is a Drain of Public Funds. Every year the Government spends MILLIONS of Dollars to keep it alive. MILLIONS could be going to our Defense. What I am saying, is that we should let the Private Industry deal with it, and make money off of privatized social security! you have not yet argued WHY this idea economically wouldn't work.https://www.theguardian.com...