BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Minecraft is awesome

Roblox is a great way to show off their creativity since there are free models for kids to help them with their building, like personal servers, they can build much faster unlike Minecraft where you gather resources to build. In creative mode on Minecraft, all you can see is pixel art, there might be good buildings, but guess what. The blocks for every thing is the same. In roblox, you can change the texture of the blocks, it has a better graphic, you don't need to collect resources, and you can build much faster like I said before. Cities could be built in a day with Roblox Personal Servers and with a very creative house, it takes about thirty minutes to an hour to build a house with Roblox Studio, especially since you have many different tools to help you with. Decoration with decals and mesh helps with the furniture. Guess what, in Minecraft, a chair and a table is made out of a stair, a fence, and a pressure plate. If you say that you could get a mod to fix that. Roblox doesn't need a mod, if you want to create things even faster in Roblox Studio, you could use a plugin, or free models. Minecraft does have free models, they only have maps. Scripting in Roblox is to Scripting in Minecraft, From Stickmasterluke to Hypixel. Look how many scripters there are in Roblox over Minecraft. If kids wanted to show off their map, they probably need a texture pack and mods. But in Roblox, you can get decals and free models for your scripts. It will take a much longer time to create something in Minecraft over something in Roblox.http://www.youtube.com...
Minecraft is awesome

However, creativity could be one thing, but how does that creativity be in use? If you were an engineer, you might want to thing of how to build a house, but does this house. http://streetinfo.com...Look like anything like this one?http://imageshack.us...Now if you seriously want me to compare the game MW3, whatever that, oh Modern Warfare 2. First of all, Modern Warfare 2 you can think of methods of shooting people and how to shoot them. You can buy guns, get many different maps to play on, like servers and you can create maps too. Same as Minecraft, but it is an animated better version of minecraft, proof here.http://www.youtube.com...Alright so you think that MW3 is you shoot people over and over right? Same as to Minecraft. Mining, Building, Mining and Building, even if you play minigames or SG, or HG, everything is the same thing, you play a a few times, you might think it is fun. After you play more than 20 times, you just want to quit.Now to add to my Roblox things, Roblox is a variety game that you can build whatever you like and you have lots of things you can do other than building, minigames, and mining. You can roleplay, play tycoons, kill people, invite your friends to you game to party or do whatever stuff, play some obey games, and many unlimited things you could possibly think of. From Jugganut to Base Wars, From Welcome to the Town of Robloxia to Sword Fight on the Heights.Just think of all the Minecraft games, what can you possibly achieve? Pvp, survival, minigames, creative. That is it. Even Roblox, you have Personal Servers and Normal Servers. Now Personal servers is almost the same thing as minecraft, as normal servers are the games like Base Wars. So tell me something I don't know about minecraft. Spleef, Mob Arena, they are all Minigames. Skyblock? Hell what are you going to achieve in skyblock? If you are playing on a server, and the server restarts, are you going to play skyblock again? Dear lord, I wouldn't do that!
Minecraft is awesome

Minecraft is amazing because you can do whatever you want, whenever, wherever. It shows the true imagination of the player, unlike MW3 Where it's a linear killshot game over and over. Minecraft is a beautifully generated landscape that it more expansive, and abundant in all activities. And thanks to modifications we can even add guns, Zepplins, Airships, and different things. Minecraft will always be there, MW3 will have 2 or 3 expansions then they will sell you another game that repeats itself. sources:http://www.minecraftforum.net...
Minecraft is awesome

What is unique about is that Minecraft is that they have a limited amount of blocks you could create, like the competitor, Roblox. You might be skilled at redstone, but however Roblox you can create whatever you like, like wedges and scripting. In Minecraft you have plugins, however in Roblox, you still have plugins for scripting and GUI's and many more things you can create. Roblox scripting can take a faster process than making a plugin. Plus, Roblox is a free game however it gives you the "chance" of buying the game. In Minecraft, to own a server, you must have lots of ram, and the players is very little. But in Roblox, you can create game places which the server is not run by you, it is run by Roblox. That does not take a RAM space and your computer memory space so your computer won't go like "rrrrrrrr!" Now if you want to compare the game Minecraft to Call Of Duty, simple as that, they have a better, animations than Minecraft as a blocky pixel world. They have guns and many more cool things that is better than Minecraft. It also lags a little bit less. Sources: http://answers.yahoo.com... http://www.roblox.com...
Minecraft is awesome

You can only do so much with mw3 until it gets repetitive. In minecraft theirs always more to explore and create. ts all about the concept of the game. As you can notice, Minecraft Graphic is neglected, the gameplay only is what counts. It has a unique creative gameplay with infinite possibilities. Surviving is such thing that makes it brilliant. Call of Duty lacks what we call a good concept, its a linear killing game in which you move from point A to B. Tell your "crappy" friend, the Concept is why his dear CoD was fucked when it came against Battlefield 3. One of the complaints I DO hear though is that people don"t know what to DO in Minecraft. Not that they don"t understand how it works, but that they really don"t have any ideas as to what to do like what to build and such. And, I"ll admit, when I first played it I too had that problem. I didn"t really understand the appeal at all, but I think if you just sit down with it for an afternoon and open your mind up to the fact that you can do pretty much anything in the game, you"ll enjoy it. It"s a game you can"t just spend 10 minutes in and form an entire opinion on.
Minecraft is awesome

Your video and your counter did not show why Minecraft is awesome. Minecraft will bore you so you would be playing something else by now.Conclusion: In Minecraft, you need an ip to get into a server, however all you need to do on Roblox is to click on a game and your finished. In Roblox you can show your creativity and free models that will help in your imagination instead of having limited amount of blocks to build with. Plus, you will build a city as that time of a house. In MW3, you can create maps unlike Minecraft you need tons of plugins and maybe a server to create Hunger Games or Survival Games. Plus, Roblox has a variety of games over Minecraft so you wouldn't quit Roblox. Minecraft only has Minigames, Creative, PVP, and Survival. Roblox you have scripts to create unthinkable amounts of games.To Voters: DO NOT VOTE BOMB SAYING THIS: "I vote for Pro because Minecraft is better than Roblox." I'm going to hunt you down and get you banned for vote bombing. So do it! I dare you!
Pit Bull Stereotypes

I accept. As it was not stated who the burden of proof lies with, I will say that I'm willing to either share or take full burden of proof. I will be arguing that saying that owners make pitbulls aggressive by putting them in fights or bringing them up in any other way as to encourage aggressive behaviour (to be the ultimate bodyguards and/or guard dogs for example) puts the cart before the horse because it's precisely because they have tendencies towards aggression in the first place that owners like to use that breed for such activities.
Pit Bull Stereotypes

I feel pit bulls are taking a lot more hate than they should be. It's not the dog that's mean, it's the owner. The reason this is happening is because pit bulls are big, strong dogs and people use them in dog fights. Owners train them to mean. I had a red-nose named Kaos and he was the nicest dog I've ever had. You know why? We taught him to be that way. We taught him that violence was unacceptable and he would be punished for being mean. But he would also be rewarded for being good. I haven't seen him in a long time but I know that as long as he's alive he will be good. I feel the Pit Bull stereotypes are stupid. you wouldn't judge the whole family because of one person who did something wrong. you wouldn't judge the whole family because of one alcoholic or one druggie, would you? Why judge the whole pit bull population because of what a few poorly trained dogs did? Think about it.
Kardashians the best reality show of all time

The Kardashians have done to TV what M Night shyamalan did to 'The Last Airbender', completely f*cked it up beyond belief. First off, the only reason the Kardashians are even famous is because their dad defended OJ Simpson in his murder trial and because Kim Kardashian made a sex tape with rapper Ray J where she basically sucked his d*ck.... They dont have any kind of talent, they arent smart, they do stupid rich-girl things all the time just to keep the show interesting; Their show is like Honey Boo Boo's at this point if they had more money then they could ever want, and the Kardashians are now simply famous for being famous.... Secondly, the show tries to manufacture its own drama just to stay relevant so that all the idiots who like the show will keep watching. Remember when Kim Kardashian married Kris Humphries from the New Jersey Nets (later moved to Brooklyn)? Yeah, that wedding lasted all but 72 DAYS before they filed for a divorce, which is retarded because Ive taken a sh*t thats lasted 72 days (in other words the only thing that is a bigger joke then Kim Kardashians marriage is the Kardashian family themselves) Thirdly, Im fairly certain the only reason people watch the show anymore is because when Kim Kardashian cries, she makes the stupidest looking face imaginable which just after a while becomes hysterical. http://media.tumblr.com... ^ Seriously is that not the dumbest face youve ever seen soemone make? And lastly Kim Kardashian is a poser. http://27.media.tumblr.com... Everybody here knows that Kim Kardashian is nothing more then a sex symbol that all men are tired of hearing about, you really mean to say that in her off time she reads Quantum Physics books? I call bullsh*t. =========================================================================== Now if you still think that Keeping up with the Kardashians is a good show, it is most certainly not the BEST reality show of all time.... Reality shows are shows that basically have no scripts whatsoever. Here is a lsit of reality shows that currently hold audience rankings that dwarf those of the Kardashians (not in any order) American Idol Cops Survivor The Amazing Race Fear Factor Man Vs Wild Deadliest Catch Ice Road Truckers Gordon Ramseys TV show (Hells Kitchen or something) Duck Dynasty Dirty Jobs Pawn Stars (One of my personal favorites) The Voice Wipeout Whale Wars Extreme Makeover Home Edition Americas Got Talent Clearly, The Kardashians have a terrible reality show that focuses mostly on the drama that arises from the kardashians own dumba** choices in life, and their show is no where as good as other reality tv shows which just demolish them in rankings or in show content. Therefore the Kardashians most certainly do NOT have the best reality show of all time, and anyone who thinks so probably shouldnt be allowed to vote or own property.
Alex Smith is an Above-Average NFL QB

Names in Bold are the ones I agree with. Let it be known that at the time of writing this Alex Smith is First in the league in percentage completion, 4th in QB rating and second in yards per attempt.Current NFL Quarterbacks that are better than Alex Smith:1. Ben Roethlisberger - Pittsburgh. Conceded, barely.2. Joe Flacco - Baltimore Based on what? He's got 8 more ints, worse pass percentage and worse QB rating. And an lower average yards per attempt. 3. Tom Brady - New England conceded4. Carson Palmer - Oakland Alex has a better QB rating5. Peyton Manning - Denver Conceded6. Phillip Rivers - San Diego Hahahahahhahaha Did you see his last game?7. Matt Schaub - Houston I'd say they were about even.8. Andrew Luck - Indianapolis Maybe in the future one day.9. Aaron Rodgers - Green Bay Conceded10. Jay Cutler - Chicago Absolutely not. 11. Matthew Stafford - Detroit He had a good season but No12. Matt Ryan - Atlanta13. Drew Brees - New Orleans I'll concede to both these guys14. Cam Newton - Carolina Really? Based on what?15. Eli Manning - NYG Concededd16. RGIII - Washington Same thing with Newton, once you figure these guys out and game plan against them, they're screwed.17. Tony Romo - Dallas After that Giants game, he was so pissed off he threw his iPhone. But that too, was picked off.18. Michael Vick - Philadelphia Ah yes, the fumbling wonder. He's so good Eagles fans are celebrating his concussion...Wait a sec...19. Sam Bradford - Los Angeles The Rams play in St.Louis now old man. And Sammy B is garbage20. Ryan Fitzpatrick - Buffalo HAHAHAHAHAHA seriously? How did that Buffalo-49ers game go again?21. Josh Freeman - Tampa Bay Good QB but Smith has better numbers. His stats are greatly inflated by having very good WR and Doug MartinSo in my opinion he's a top Ten QB. Also numbers don't lie.
Alex Smith is an Above-Average NFL QB

Since I blew a round, I'm just going to simply list what NFL QBs are better than Smith, and which ones are less desirable. Which (six or more) QBs would you switch? I'll criticize your choices in my last round (you may have two rounds for criticism since I forfeited). Commenters' lists encouraged! Current NFL Quarterbacks that are better than Alex Smith: 1. Ben Roethlisberger - Pittsburgh. 2. Joe Flacco - Baltimore 3. Tom Brady - New England 4. Carson Palmer - Oakland 5. Peyton Manning - Denver 6. Phillip Rivers - San Diego 7. Matt Schaub - Houston 8. Andrew Luck - Indianapolis 9. Aaron Rodgers - Green Bay 10. Jay Cutler - Chicago 11. Matthew Stafford - Detroit 12. Matt Ryan - Atlanta 13. Drew Brees - New Orleans 14. Cam Newton - Carolina 15. Eli Manning - NYG 16. RGIII - Washington 17. Tony Romo - Dallas 18. Michael Vick - Philadelphia 19. Sam Bradford - Los Angeles 20. Ryan Fitzpatrick - Buffalo 21. Josh Freeman - Tampa Bay Current NFL Quarterbacks that are not as good as Alex Smith: 1. Andy Dalton - Cincinnati 2. Mark Sanchez - NYJ 3. Brandon Weeded - Cleveland 4. Ryan Tannehill - Miami 5. Matt Cassel - Kansas City 6. Blaine Gabbert - Jacksonville 7. Jake Locker - Tennessee 8. Christian Ponder - Minnesota 9. Russel Wilson - Seattle 10. John Skelton - Arizona
Minimum wage

Well Milton Friedman agrees with me. It raises unemployment, especially for teenagers and less educated minorities. For those of you who don't know, Milton Friedman won an economics noble prize. Here is his video explaining my reasoning: http://www.youtube.com... So here's an example, if your worth 4$ an hour I'm not gonna ire you for 8$ an hour. The video is old, but the arguments are still the same, the only difference was minimum wage was 2.50 back then. And there's a few racist words in there. Well with that explained , I will talk about the immigration. It shouldn't affect immigration, but it does. Here's why, you can pay them what their worth! If there worth minimum wage, pay them it, if not pay them less. If there was no minimum wage we could compete with these immigrants more easily because you don't have to pay me more then what I'm worth. If I am worth 4$ and the and so is the illegal then you can hire either one, then it comes down to who is gonna have less face tattoos because i don't want my businesses looking it hires from the lowest of the low. Does this make sense? Because looking at it from a common sense stand point it does.
Minimum wage

1st round opening argument 2nd second argument 3rd round disagreeing point 4th closing argument, more rebuttals. Well, i am against the minimum wage, and I know that idea is un-popular, I'm only debating this to make a point. Minimum wage has increased unemployment and is a big reason that immigration is a problem. The reason it makes immigration a problem is because you can pay immigrants a lot less and they won't complain whereas you have to pay a teenager 7.50 $ an hour. good luck and have fun.
Judaism Is More Likely to be True Than False

I must first start off by saying that I am disappointed in the fact that none of my opening arguments were attacked. Therefore, I extend all of those arguments. I. Rebuttals to observations A. Miracles Non-Jweish religions are not always attributed from false religions. G-d has given us a test to know whether or not who is and who is not a false prophet. (Remember: A prophet does NOT always have to be one who does miracles and/or predict the future). B. Prophecy Since this debate is not about Christian prophesy, I failed to give a few examples. I appologize for that. Argumentum ad populum and I am appealing to the authority of the Bible itself. I will concede the prophecies fulfilled in other religions. Though, I fail to see how that shows Judaism is false or plural religions are true. C. Transformation I have conceded the transformation problem. II. Rebuttals to contentions 1) i) To an extent, yes they can be "saved. " ii) Again, I do not deny the fact that multiple religions make claims with miracles. III) Case against pluralism My partner concedes that no religion can possibly be the absolute truth; yet that is what all religions claim to be. Therefore, pluralism has a problem. Thank you for a fun debate. Sorry, I was not familiar with religious plurality hypothesis so I wasn't totally prepared to debunk every last claim. Anyway, I extend all opening arguments. Considering that my partner conceded my opening arguments, we can say that Judaism is more likely to be true than false.
Judaism Is More Likely to be True Than False

Greetings,This debate is for the Socialpinko ELO Tournament Round 1. In this debate, I will argue for the validity of the Tanakh, and thus, the validity of Judaism.THESIS The Jewish faith is more than likely to be tue than false due to the miracuous revelation at Mount Sinai and the fulfillment of prophecy, which is available for the world to see.DEFINITIONS Tanakh: The 39 books of the Hebrew Bibe (or the "Old Testament" if you prefer). Judaism: The Jewish faith.More likely: Greater than 50%Rules I. Rounds Round 1: AcceptanceRound 2: Opening ArgumentsRound 3: 1st RebuttalsRound 4: 2nd Rebuttals. II. Technical A. VotingPlease read the entire debate before voting. Conduct: A violation of any rule results in an automatic conduct loss of the conduct vote.Spelling: I am not too picky about spelling; but please spell appropriately. Points may be awarded for superb spelling/grammar and/or structure.Please post a detaied RFD. An RFD that may be deemed a "vote bomb" may be nullified. B. AttacksA display of any anti-sematic behaviour, or behaviour that constitutes ad hom. attacks will result in an automatic loss. C. SourcesPlease do not plagarise. Plagarism is an automatic loss.D. Forfeiting. If you desire to resign the debate, please do so honorably---do not troll or prolong the debate. E. Structure The arguments should be clear and easy to follow. Please tag the arguments (i.e,, contention 1; premise 1 etc.) III. Acceptance In round 1, please post that you have read and agree to abide by the rules to the debate. Moreover, you are more than welcome to post your thesis and/or any other definitions you see fit. You may post a summary of your arguments.IV. Burden of Proof The burden of proof is shared. I must prove that Judaism is more likey (50%+) to be true than false. My partner must show the opposite.Good luck!:-)
The Christian God was not justified in instrumenting mass-killings in the Old Testament.

I've made this debate impossible to accept, so comment if you would like to accept it. The Bible documents numerous accounts where the Christian God caused, ordered, and/or instrumented mass-killings and essentially genocides. My position will attempt to prove that these instances were unjustified while Con's position should be that every single one of them is justified. Definition of justified: Having, done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason. . http://www.oxforddictionaries.com... Definition of genocide: The deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. . http://www.oxforddictionaries.com... Definition of mass murder: the act of murdering a large number of people (four or more), typically at the same time or over a relatively short period of time. . http://www.princeton.edu... Unfortunately, both of the last words have an inherently negative connotation to them, but I can't think of other words to describe it euphemistically. If you have any other words in mind, don't hesitate to let me know. Comment if you'd like to accept, and let's hope for an intelligent discussion! Addendum: No arguments presupposing the moral perfection of the Christian God are allowed. We are here to determine whether or not the actions in question were justified and/or compatible with a morally perfect God.
America is being "dumbed down"

Thanks to Pro for the Challenge. Pro lays out 3 arguments to show that Americais being dumbed down, however none of them lead to his conclusion. Texting Pro claims that this has lead to young people not caring about spelling and grammar. However, as Pros source points out: “It’s like you have two languages in your head”. Students today have to learn proper English and texting lingo in order to balance their professional and social lives. This has actually made it more difficult for these students, which his source credits for these instances of texting lingo ending up in school newspapers. It is a problem we have to deal with, and will only result in more complication. Religion and Science Pros argument that religion is hindering the advancement of science does not support America being dumbed down. The basis of Pros claim is that evolution = smart, while religion = dumb. So if we accept his basis then the question is; is this getting worse? As Pros source shows, the percentage of people who believe that humans have evolved with no involvement from God has gone up from 9% to 15% in the past 20 years, while those who believe in involvement from God in evolution has gone down from 82% to 78% during the same time period. State of the Union vs. Super Bowl I would go back and compare statistics but in this case that would be meaningless. State of the Union speech ratings are largely determined by the political climate and the popularity of the President, as such there is no distinct pattern to gain anything valuable from. The reason the Super Bowl has so many more viewers is because it is entertaining, which has always gained more attention then politics. This does not lead Pros conclusion. Education One very important point that Pro failed to consider is the level of education Americans are now attaining. Since 1940 the percentage of Americans in their 20’s who have a high school or higher education has gone from about 30% to now over 80%, and those with a bachelor’s degree or higher have gone from about 5% to now over 20%(1). The reason for this is quite simple; it is more difficult to earn a living in the US today then it was years ago. This trend will continue because of the advancement of technology. When I was in school we had to learn MS word, now kids have to learn MS word, Power Point, and Excel. A doll just won’t do it for a 5 year old anymore, now they need cell phones and all kind of child games (which are normally created with some educational value). And as non-skilled labor jobs disappear they are being replaced with high tech jobs requiring a higher education. If America was dumbing down our society would be moving backward, not forward. (1) http://upload.wikimedia.org...