The Harry Potter series is superior to the Twilight saga.

If this is not already a poor argument (I will state below) Con has violated a few rules which I set out. Q1: "Ok it watch both movies and I really don't like any,but if i really had to choose it would be twilight."It's great that you enjoyed the movie but rule one does state that this argument is about the books foremost, and this is the focus of the debate. I state that any arguments regarding the films/movies are invalid.Q2: "First twilight made $191,195,655."You broke the second rule by not promoting one series above the other, but rather stating facts about one. (ie: you should have given the amount that Harry Potter made) You didn't state whether this was how much the books made, the films made or how much they made combined. I'm just going to clear this up for voters. The Harry Potter books have sold 400million copies, wheras the Twilight books (plus The Host) have sold 10million copies. [1] Frankly I think that bringing money and stats into this debate is unwise and unreliable as Harry Potter has 3 books on Twilight, and has been around about 8 years longer. I'm just putting voters' minds at rest here.Q3: "Also harry potter is very boring, and I am not the only that thinks that. Lots of people think it's very boring."This sentance violates both rules 2 and 3. You violate rule two by giving an empty comment (Harry Potter is very boring) and giving absolutely nothing to back that up with. Explain why it's boring if you think that. Boring characters? Boring plot? Boring descriptions? If you think this please explain why. Simply stating that Harry Potter is boring is not really an argument. Also, rule 2 says that you have to compare. It's great that you think HP is boring, but are you saying that twilight is not?Personally I find Twilight extremely boring. Reasons?Bella has very little personality. She never gets excited or even happy about anything, always comes across as bored and never does anything spontaneous. Reading a character that just conforms to everyday life, moans about the weather and never says anything interesting, makes quite a boring read. Also, Edward has no imperfections or quirks. He is the archetypal hot boyfriend. He doesnt have anything that makes him different! He isnt funny or witty, he doesnt come out with interesting lines, he doest propose that they do fun things together. He, like Bella, never does anything spontaneous, just because. We never see him getting a thrill out of something, or just doing something random for fun. He is, like Bella, so boring to read as he is like every other heart-throb character out there. Both of the main characters are just chlich'es.I believe that HP is better because every single character has depth and is quirky and interesting. They all have more than what they come across as. Hermione comes across as a boring know-it all, but we find out that she has a lot of depth. She has confused feelings about people she loves, she has a great deal of regret about what she did to her family (I'm not spoiling) and she is fiercely loyal. I'm not going to go on about every HP character as I feel I have made my point.1. http://www.amazon.com...;