The Holy Spirit is real

This round is all rebuttals: "...But I can't prove to you I saw a ghost regardless if you saw one too at another time, in another place. I can't prove to you aliens exist regard if you believe it or not." You cannot feel or experience aliens or ghosts, because according to the stories, aliens are their own species and they do not rule anything and ghosts are dead people who come back to 'earth' as souls; all unlike the Holy Spirit therefore irrelevant to the subject. The Bible can be figurative and still prove something, am I wrong? Besides, I didn't say the Bible is figurative, I said 'figuratively speaking the Bible proves the existence of the Holy Spirit.' God's Word describes who/what the Holy Spirit is; this obviously doesn't just prove that the Holy Spirit is real yet shows us how we know that 'speaking in tongues of men in angels' is from the Holy Spirit. New resolution for this statement - so that you can further understand - is "Non directly the Bible proves the Holy Spirit is Real." I want a rebuttal for my argument concerning that the Universe is evidence for the Holy Spirit and what do I get? A typical atheist answer: "Well, actually it literally proves matter exist--nothing else." Let me ask you, how did the matter get there? It came out of thin air...oh wait, in the very beginning there WAS no air...hmm? The very fact that what I explained is true is proof that a Creator is quite likely and that the Holy Spirit is part of the tri-une, almighty Creator God. New resolution for this statement so that you can understand me better: "Science proves the Holy Spirit is real." All your rebuttals have been wasted because of your 1) ignorance, or 2) misunderstanding on my argument. "Copi says that only evidence of something that exist or occurred is provable. And if it did actually occurred qualified investigators would like find some evidence of it." The first video you posted is proof that there have been investigations on the events and occurrences and these investigations turned out positive and proving that the Christian's claim is true. About the video you posted (speaking in tongues medical study proves), I do not see why it is faulty. "There is nothing about that video that proves a holy spirit. Just a bunch of Third World Pakistanis adopting a practice historically shown to have slaughtered the same race of people." There is nothing about that last sentence that explains how hundreds of people literally crash to the ground in seemingly trances, sometimes shaking violently and other times talking in Tongues. I extend my argument and wish you would please rebut. Acts 2 you showed but did not point out anything worth talking about. '1. There is no physical evidence or eyewitness testimony apart from the bible that this event really occurred. No one secular historian has ever produced authenic evidence this event took place." Well obviously, because he's secular! And can you prove that the Bible is not made up of authentic journals that proves the writers are not eyewitnesses themselves? You have been dismissing that thought and moving onto ridiculing it's contents. Stop jumping to conclusions, please. I went to 1:48 of that medical study video. Nothing but truth comes from those mouths. Is this investigation, run by real medics and scientists, not enough to prove it is not a language? And if you watched the whole thing, you would know why Anita says those syllables. BECAUSE it is HER language personally given to from the HOLY SPIRIT. The vid also pointed out how everybody has a different Tongue (a.k.a. Heart) Language. "If God told man to write the Bible in his words and God told them to write "speaking in (human) languages", then why do Christians attribute speaking in (human) languages to babbling sounds? How come the Greek word for tongues in the Act chapter has the human meaning for human language--and not babble or an unknown word? An unknown word would be some convincing evidence that the babble Anita spoke was indeed the language of angels or God." Think of your childhood when you were around 5 or 6 years old. When I was that age and I heard foreign languages, I would not know what they were saying and also laugh because it entered my brain as gibberish. It wasn't identifiable to me and are not to anyone who doesn't speak the language. You do not have a source for that Greek claim so I will wait on that. "Is this not the sign of mental illness, for multiple people to invent an undecipherable phonetic ramble and not use an actual language? Not only is it lunacy, its a fraud, and its laughable." You have proven my point. Approximately 77% of the American adult population are now labelled mentally crazy by you. First I ask you, why would all those people CARE or even bother creating a whole language, practicing speaking it, and then spending half their lives at church worshiping a figment of their imagination and posting YouTube videos about it? That's a huge "fraud." Second of all, I'd like to see you try to speak the way Anita did. If you can do that exactly show us all. Then what will be laughable? My summary is that the Holy Spirit has not been disproven by you, so I hope you understand my argument better now so we can seriously debate.