Resolved: North Korea should reunite with South Korea

ok... I will concede all but one part of my opponents case(seeing as how i have lost on those points)! point 1) what this debate boils down to is the economics of the countries. we must only look to the economics of the debate because that is what we have focused on the majority of the time. my opponent brings up 2 flawed pieces of evidence why socialism is wrong... 1) she says that "There are no 'pure' capitalistic states, and no 'pure' socialist states, and no 'pure' communist states." i do acknowledge that there are no "pure capitalist" countries, but there are "pure socialist" countries. i will touch more on this in my next point. is a country is not communist or capitalist, then it is socialist. see diagram Diagram 1) Communism--------------------------Socialism-------------------------Capitalism <----more equal to everyone more for the individual----> notice that socialism is in the middle.thus it is a mixture of the 2. please note that my opponent my revert to this diagram if she needs to. it is very self-explanatory. 2) my opponent's definitions are in direct conflict with one another. one says that it is communist and another says that it is "a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done." the word "transition" implies that the system is a MIXTURE or an in between of the two! moreover, my opponent says that what i am describing is a mixture of socialism and capitalism. i hate to break it to her, but that is still socialism!!!! also, if the goods are not equally distributed, then not only does it show capitalism, but since it is on the way to the establishment of communism, it shows that socialism is between capitalism and communism. thus, if the two countries unite, socialism will occur... point 2) When my opponent says that China doesn't want to be communist anymore and are in fact socialist, then we can show that the best economy in Asia is in fact SOCIALIST and that a socialist economy is the key to economic success. Thus, if the DPRK and the ROK combine into one Korea, then their economies will flourish and become a huge economic power in the world... moreover, this encompasses my opponents point of civil war. seeing how Karl Marx was a socialist/communist theroist, the says from his book The Communist Manifesto on the very last page... "Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution. the proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES UNITE!" this means that a revolution or a civil war would have to ensue in order for socialism to have its start. this socialist revolution would cause the breakdown of the two governments in both Koreas and thus mean unite. diagram 2) North: Communist--> workers angry at ow wages--> people revolt--> GVMT weakened--> need a less drastic form of economics--> socialism adopted--> Union of Korea to prevent loss of power (protection from outside threat) South: "Capitalist"--> workers tired of bad work conditions (either present or possible of happening)--> GVMT weakened--> Union of Koreas to prevent loss of power(protection from outside threat) point 3) my opponents also states "In Socialism, there is no real incentive to strive, merely to maintain the functional status quo." however, the point still remains that not all of the factors of production are under state control, just some of them are... thus, the free market still remains and the status quo is still kept in check! moreover, there is a thing called strikes that also ruins my opponent's clever argument. lets take schools for example. if the students don't like the way a teacher is instructing, then all of the students can strike against him/her and the teacher must change or she will not teach and thus not get paid... if it were a capitalist system, then the fault would be on the students and they would be kicked out of school for defiance and the teacher would be fine... or a job also. people can strike if they don't like it, but in a capitalist society, the workers would be fired and replaced! this is a detriment because these people have to survive and if they are fired for trying to promote the status quo, then that is not the best thing! thus i urge the following plan to be enacted: 1) the people of North and South Korea must wage a socialist revolution sparked by the encouragement of the USA. 2) this will be funded by the US Federal government 3) the countries of North and South Korea unite under socialism 4) The US and other ally nations will help the new Korean government to enact this system to its fullest extent 5) Kim Jong-il and Roh Moo-Hyun (the current leaders of both Koreas) in order to have knowledge of both extremes of the economic spectrum. thus, i urge an affirmative ballot.