Evolution is a fact

You have given me some things to consider, and I appreciate that and you for it. Honestly, it shouldn't matter who wins or loses as I had, as mentioned, learned and also enjoyed this debate. That's all that I should/care about in the end- enjoying myself as well as learning. I believe that you should as well. "I have not called the audience stupid. I encouraged them to not be stupid and vote in a why that would deny blatant fact. Of course they have the ability to decide and vote however voting for an idea that has been proven to be completely wrong is stupid and delusional. " My apologies, I misunderstood. Nevertheless you have referred to the audience as stupid for not believing in a opinion contrary to what is believed or assumed to be the 'correct answer. ' Please consider how some may view this as offensive and disrespectful. All people are entitled to their opinions, and if they firmly believe them and do what they can to support those opinions, I believe they are worth considering- no matter how different the opinions may be. To conclude my argument, I stand firmly with my belief that there has not been a trusted method to proving Evolution, given logical and what I deem is reasonable doubt that they truly answer some questions that are intended to be answered- such as carbon dating with the candle analogy/question. To me, I have not been given sufficient enough evidence to agree that the methods are reliable and trustworthy both from my own research and the methods provided by you. In other words, I do not believe you have proven how effective they really are and how truly accurate they are at that- you simply give the reason you believe them to be accurate. For example you state that they use precise measurements. " Precise measurements can be incorrect, as well as correct- it simply is the equivalent to careful research, not accurate research at times. If we had more rounds, I would ask you what makes a "accurate prediction. " As for your percentage, you would be correct. You would also be correct in saying that there will always be a percentage who doubt, but that is not against my belief/point that doubt is doubt no matter the size- and that that doubt should be considered with reason. On account of sources, as I recall, you have only cited two of your claims (moths from Wikipedia and the Pew Research percentage- to which you have not provided a title or anything for me to look it up off of at that), so while I can believe your claims to be true and general knowledge, I have no sources to prove them- by this logic, I don't believe I can consider these points as true without doing research on my own to confirm them. Yes, I do use articles, but I believe that the mass of the internet is articles or entries entered into websites- so by this logic, yes, all my information comes from articles/web-entries. If it matters and you truly do care- I have always believed in a form of Evolution (because yes, Christians can agree as well- seemingly opposing your belief that they do not)- but not that it has been accurately measured yet, thus we can't consider it true and hence I believe by definition that it cannot be deemed a fact. This, however, is simply my opinion/position just as you believe Evolution is a fact. If you have any questions for me, comment or message me and I will be happy to answer anyone's questions. Audience: Vote for whoever you believe won/lost. I honestly thank you for/appreciate the vote no matter who you vote for. Once again, just thank you for/appreciate the opportunity, LoveRichardDawkins. Hope we meet again sometime!