On Earth The Sun Actually Rises In The West And Sets In The East

Thanks for that response Con. Some corrections need to be made. Also, the definitions are quite clear. Reminder to all, opt-in voting required. ***Correction***I'm an idiot. I posted the wrong link for both Los Angeles and Tokyo. .. total botch on my part, so here are the correct links for each:Sunrise in Los Angeles, USA. . https://www.google.com...Sunset in Tokyo, Japan. . https://www.google.com...***End of Correction****Responding to Con*I have already made the case that on earth, the sun rises in the west and sets in the east, because Californians experience sunrises and the Japanese experience sunsets; I assumed that all understood that these were places on earth. Con points out:"the definitions of east and west state "denoting the (eastern/western) part of a specified area. "My response:Right, and since California is in the western hemisphere of the earth and Japan is in the eastern hemisphere of the earth, we're talking about the west and east of the earth, the "specified area" you referenced. Con continues:"The specified area is Earth, but you can get more specific with that. "My response:Was I not specific when I mentioned the eastern and western hemispheres? In the west of the specified area the earth, the sun rises. In the east of the specified area the earth, the sun sets. Con near concedes:"You can say that in California, in the western hemisphere, that the sun rise in the western hemisphere. "My response:Therefore, given the agreed to definitions, you concede half of the resolution that the sun does appear above the horizon in the west of the specified area the earth. Con asserts:"here is the only arguments needed to warrant a vote for con. "My response:Despite the subject-verb disagreement, I'm curious. .. Con continues:"what does the resolution say? 'On Earth, the sun actually rises in the west and sets in the east'. .. "On Earth". Where on Earth, you might ask. "My response:The western and eastern hemispheres respectively? Con adds:"The answer is, all of it. The resolution never specified where on Earth. "My response:Right, since the resolution didn't specify where on earth, *anywhere* on earth would satisfy "on earth," and, while I feel it silly to point out, both California and Japan are "on earth" and the western and eastern hemispheres are specified areas "on earth" as well. Con pushes:"It says "On Earth" meaning throughout all the Earth. "My response:Nope. It says that earth is the planet on which we live, yet no one ever lives "throughout all the earth. "Living in one part of the earth satisfies "on earth. "In fact, no one who lives ON EARTH has ever been "throughout all the earth," because there's too much deep sea and liquid hot core to be throughout all of it. Con persists:"Unless pro can prove that EVERYWHERE on Earth, the resolution is true, you should vote con. "My response:I'm going to turn your reasoning against you, Con. You rightly mentioned that:"The resolution doesn't say "On Earth, in California. .. The resolution never specified where on Earth. "So then you also agree, since the resolution did not specify, that the resolution doesn't say "Everywhere on earth" just like it didn't say "On earth in California. "This leaves "on earth" to be satisfied by ANY location on earth, not ALL locations on earth as Con would fallaciously have you believe. *Conclusion*The resolution is affirmed, because, on earth, in the western hemisphere, in Los Angeles, USA, the sun rises and, on earth, in the eastern hemisphere, in Tokyo, Japan, the sun sets; Con's given no reason to doubt these facts.