That germ theory is false

1- A doctor prescribing a medication that is unnecessary and "dangerous" falls under the umbrella of medical malpractice. Pro and I can agree that this is wrong. However, each medication has what is called a therapeutic index, or the dose at which a medication produces a therapeutic response. Some medications - especially cancer drugs - have incredibly small therapeutic indeces, and require skill to prescribe and administer them. This can be considered "dangerous," however all doctors way the cost of the benefits against the disease itself. I'd like a specific source detailing that doctors are only there to make money.2- What causes a legal case to become critical? The severity of the disease? Claiming that doctors use the court system and the court system allows this requires a study, an article, a source of some sort. 3- Unfortunately when utilizing a source, one cannot expect his or her opponent to have to search for the information. The source is to be specific and to the point, as is when writing an academic paper... Pro directed me to a home page and expected that I find his source for him. Additionally, while I was taught to evaluate a source for validity, there were a few qualifications of a good source. Typically a credible source is organized, streamlined, and professional looking, as is with most academic databases such as the well trusted EBSCOhost. This is not the case with vaclib: it is a website with HTML that appears straight out of the early 2000s. There isn't much rhyme or reason the organizational structure, the font is inconsistent, and there is a smattering of images everywhere without consideration for readability. By these counts alone, I do not find this source credible.I will also note, again, that some of the "Facts" pages contain phishing attempts and malware; proceed with caution (and a good antivirus).Pro is accusing me of lacking computer skills or playing dumb, and is also implying I have low intelligence for a daughter of a doctor. This is compleletely inappropriate behavior for a debtae.4- Overcrowding has everything to do with transmission. Waste is by definition unsanitary, as it is rife with nutrients and bacteria. Dirty drinking water is also rife with waste and bacteria, which makes it unsanitary. What causes someone to become sick if the water is dirty if not bacteria? I'd like to turn Pro to an article on coliform bacteria and the purity of drinking water: [1]On a different note, I will again state how overcrowding influences the spread of disease. In close quarters where people utilize unsanitary practices, disease spreads quickly. Take cholera, a bacteria that uses the fecal to oral route. Unsanitary waste management paves the way for transmission, as handling waste and not washing your hands and then going on to touch your mouth or eyes easily allows the disease to spread.5- Source on vaccinations not preventing disease, period? Re: disinfectants not killing all germs.. Disinfectants do indeed kill most pathogens. However, endospores, resistant Gram negative bacteria, and protozoan cysts are rather hard to kill. [2] We can observe the lack of bacterial growth by placing pellets of antibiotics on a prepared petri dish of bacteria. It was actually a lab I did last semester. [3]Pro also states that if a disinfectant is not 100% effective (which no disinfecting method is), it is useless. This is false, as the body can much easier handle a smaller fraction of a lethal dosage of bacteria.6- What source proves my sources false? And what allows Pro to guess and become more credible? He is not a proven doctor, scientist, microbiologist, or physiologist. Simply because he does not believe in conventional medicine does not mean he is correct.7- Pro has committed the fallacy of false equivalence. Pure chlorine is a gas, firstly. Pure chlorine is also pure chlorine, meaning you're probably going to get at least 1,000,000 times more chlorine per intake of breath than in the trace amount in whatever food you happen to be eating. But if you happen to ingest a trace of pure chlorine and also ingest a hint of chlorine in food of equal amount, again, the body has no clue what came from where. Molecules are molecules regardless of their origin.8- The source given actually corroborates with medical knowledge. It is irrelevent to his continued argument.It does not matter if Pasteur lied and used deception in his experiments. The fact is that the experiment that disproved spontaneous generation is repeatable and will produce the same exact results over and over again. This experiment was not a fraud; in fact, you can watch a model here. [4]9, 10, 11- I have already stated in Round 2, point 13 that the Paleo diet does not prevent disease according to science. I can also attest to becoming sick while eating very low carb, as diet does not determine immunity. He has failed to provide a source in which the Paleo diet cures all ailments.12- "Bad" bacteria can grow on anything that caters to its nutrition needs. This is why we cook meat: bacteria grows in rare meat, and if you eat undercooked meat, you can become sick. This is a hole in Pro's "grain, sugar, and dairy" argument.[1] http://epi.publichealth.nc.gov...[2] https://www.boundless.com...[3] https://image.slidesharecdn.com...[4]