The conservative view point should be labled as hate speech to eliminate it for ever.

I believe that sadolite is, sadly, misconstruing my last post; the absurdity of which I speak is twofold: a. It's absurd for my opponent to ask me to find a liberal who defends conservative ideology; this situation is, by nature, self-contradicting, and probably impossible; thus, my opponent can't ask this of me. b. I'm also saying it's absurd to claim that, because conservatives don't support hand outs, that they hate children, the elderly, etc. and are denying them health care, which is highly fallacious; as I said before, people need an opportunity to work for their benefits (for example, the elderly working and putting in for their pension or 401K, or parents working to support themselves and their children); anything more would be, as I stated previously, encouraging unemployment and indigence. He provides us next with several unbiased links, such as 'Liberapedia', and tells us that, because a lot of people are accusing Conservatives of hate, that this must be a true claim, because these accusations go unchallenged; it would seem to me that my opponent's logic is stuffed to the brim with fallacies today. a. The Negative Proof Fallacy My opponent makes the claim that because these accusations haven't been challenged (and thus, have not been proven false), that these accusations must be true; as we can see, just because nobody has supposedly challenged these allegations does not mean that they ought to be accepted as fact; they are accusations, and nothing more. b. The Ad Populum Fallacy This really speaks for itself; he's saying that because a LOT of people have accused conservatives of hate speech, these accusations must be true; of course, the fallacy in this is, as I said, self-demonstrating. To answer my opponent's question, it's very difficult for suits to be filed against such a multitude of accusers, especially by the entire conservative movement. Oh, and folks, this is an appeal to probability here: He's basically telling us, because they could file a lawsuit, that they WILL file a lawsuit; obviously a fallacious claim. And, look back to before; simply because law suits are not filed does not make these claims true. Honestly, if you want to want to buy my opponent's claims that blogs, 'encyclopedias' and biased websites prove that conservatives are bound up in hate, I guess I can provide a few of my own 'proving' that the hate actually rests with the liberals. Example: http://jimunro.blogspot.com... In fact, just google the phrase "liberal hate" and you'll come up with plenty of things. So, my opponent claims that many of my arguments are 'irrelevant', but if that's the case, then the multitude of arguments he's dropped are also irrelevant; so, my opponent has to make a choice at this point; keep his arguments and respond to mine, or essentially drop his entire case; the ball is in your court, sadolite. A few example arguments of my opponent's that he has dropped: 1. Conservative views on government handouts 2. Any group who doesn't agree with liberal ideas is a hate group. 3. Conservatives hate children, the elderly, the middle class, and are equivalent to Hitler. 4. The government knows whats best, and conservatism is getting in the way of government takeover of everything. A few examples of my arguments that he has dropped: 1. My opponent is being very hypocritical in accusing conservatives of hate speech, while in the same breath comparing conservatives to Hitler, and declaring that these people must be eliminated. 2. The parent-child scenario: Just because a parent doesn't give the child everything he/she wants does not mean that the parent hates the child; same with government; conservatives don't support a lot of handouts, but that doesn't mean they hate America. 3. My bonus argument about the 1st Amendment, and how, if conservatives were preaching hate and violence at the public level, the speech would most likely be legally disallowed; also, more of my opponent's hypocrisy shows up, since, while liberalism generally emphasizes freedom and tolerance, my opponent has been preaching the kind of 'hate and eradication' talk that he's been accusing conservatives of. So, in the end, besides a few out-of-context quotes, biased sources (from liberal sites like Liberapedia and Feministing), and a couple of less-than-appropriate jokes about Obama and a group of firefighters, there's very little hate being promoted by the conservative community. Again, saving a few arguments for the endgame, I'll again step down and let my opponent have the soapbox.