Macro-evolution & the Bible are not reconcilable

My opponent offered a very good round 2. I was impressed by his insight. His enormous knowledge in this subject is vaulable. Thank him for this debate and his compliments. I take it from con's round 2 that he completely concedes the Biblical account in this debate. We went over in the Biblical account that man, beast, the universe and all plant life were specifically and seperately created by God. Con basically gives us his description of macro-evolution and asserts that it can be reconciled with the Bible. Con has left us wondering how macro-evolution has happened yet if it is to be reconciled with the Bible timeline. We should look at now, the age of life from the Biblical account and how macro-evolution can not have took place by that time frame. Biblical timeline The Biblical timeline has been researched for a long time. The Bible timeline has been researched that the "first day" of Creation Week starts on the Gregorian calendar in 4101 BC. This exact year starts in 4115 BC on the Jewish Hebrew 364-Day "sacred" calendar. This 364-Day calendar is called "sacred" because it is totally derived from the numbered years in the text of Scripture. The real age of the earth is around 6,012 solar years according to the Bible. The Biblical text clearly states there are 4,096 years from Creation Week until the Birth of Jesus. All of the estimated dates used is in the Bible are based on information found in the Old Testament Book of Genesis. The remaining Bible events are also dated from the Book of Exodus until the events of Easter Week in 30 AD found in the New Testament. The year of 1445 BC, the most accepted year of the Exodus, was used as the Anchor Year for the entire Bible Timeline using a 364-Day Hebrew calendar consistent with the Biblical text. The dates given in the Bible Chronology Timeline are not consistent with current start dates of the Babylonian Exile (588-586 BC) and the restoration date of Solomon’s Temple (515 BC) using unknown sources outside the pages of Scripture. As we see, the earth, universe and all life within them are only approxamitly 6,012 years old by the Biblical account. This is hardly enough time for macro-evolution to take place. We also went over the impossiblity of the Bible refering to long ages but was refering to literal 24-hour days. We have not reconciled the Bible and macro-evolution yet. Macro-evolutionary timeline We should go over the estimated timeline of macro-evolution. The timeline of the evolution of life outlines the major events in the development of life on the planet earth. Dates given are estimates based on supposed scientific evidence. In biology, evolution is the process by which populations of organisms acquire and pass on novel traits from generation to generation. Its occurrence over large stretches of time explains the origin of new species and ultimately the vast diversity of the biological world, this is known as macro-evolution. Contemporary species are related to each other through common descent, products of evolution and spectation over billions of years. Almost all evoltuionist will teach you that the earth is a estimated 4.6 billion years. I offer a timeline below. The basic timeline of a 4.6 billion year old Earth, with approximate dates: 3.6 billion years of simple cells (prokaryotes), 3.4 billion years of stromatolites demonstrating photosynthesis, 2 billion years of complex cells (eukaryotes), 1 billion years of multicellular life, 600 million years of simple animals, 570 million years of arthropods (ancestors of insects, arachnids and crustaceans), 550 million years of complex animals, 500 million years of fish and proto-amphibians, 475 million years of land plants, 400 million years of insects and seeds, 360 million years of amphibians, 300 million years of reptiles, 200 million years of mammals, 150 million years of birds, 130 million years of flowers, 65 million years since the dinosaurs died out, 2.5 million years since the appearance of the genus Homo, 200,000 years of anatomically modern humans, 25,000 years since the disappearance of Neanderthal traits from the fossil record. 13,000 years since the disappearance of Homo floresiensis from the fossil record. Rebuttal My went about in his previous round to give anologies of evolution. His examples were not even related to the long ages it takes for macro-evolution to occur. Though he did show us the simple form of micro-evolution and that over a certain amount of time those changes result into macro-evolution. I may be wrong but my opponent also seemed to suggest that two closely related species that do not mate are macro-evolution. That is not correct. If these species can not mate then that would more along the lines of macro-evolution. Though the examples provided are not that case. My opponent's examples are not different than the mating of dog's. (EX.) I have two dog's, let's say pitbull's, they mate and produce puppies. The puppies have different sizes and colors but are still pitbull's. They are no doubt still dog's. One of the puppies mate's with a rockweller. The puppies are no longer pitbull's nor rockweller's but are still no doubt dog's. Over generation after generation these rock and pit puppies mate with many other breeds. After all this mating by their offspring, the puppies are now complete mutt's of many breed's. Though still they are dog's. Now, I take the original male pitbull that began this process and try to mate him with one of the female mutt's of the last litter. By suprise, he wants nothing to do with her. This case is not because he can not mate with her but because by some reason he doesn't want her. It may be her mixed nature or some gene she has that he will not mix with. Though they can breed if wanted too. In fact this is a true fact within nature. Human being's do this and so do many animals in nature. Grant it that many animals just do not care and will mate within any in their species and maybe outside of it. My opponent has simply given us a example of different breed's and not macro-evolution. My opponent suggested a anology for us but the ensatina eschscholtzi is a lungless salamander of the family Plethodontidae. Presently, seven subspecies are recognized, and all occur in California. However, incipient species formation is in its early stages and thus species borders and distinctions remain unclear. The biological complexity of Ensatina argues against a simple taxonomic resolution because the evolutionary realities of diversification in old and persistent complexes require compromises if Linnaean taxonomies are to be used. A new taxonomy may be required when studies in progress are concluded, for the present the Ensatina complex will be recognized as a single taxonomic species. Many salamanders mate and capable of it regardless of the do or not. http://www.ensatina.net... http://www.oocities.org... Conclusion We should conclude so far that the Bible and Macro-evolution can not be reconciled by the explanations given. We are not here to debate whether the macro-evolution account is true or that the Biblical account is true. What we are debating here is whether the Biblical account can be reconciled with the macro-evolutionary account. With the picture of only a 6,000 to 7,000 years for life from the Bible compared to billions of years of life for macro-evoltuion, we have not seen reason to link the two as compatiable. RESOLUTION IS AFFIRMED http://www.biology-online.org... http://www.bibletimeline.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://paleontology.wikia.com...