Women wrestling are better than men stitching

Oooohh this just got serious! Thank you for your arguments, Pro. R1. "My opponent claims that women wrestling would be "lame to watch" because they are "done" with physical activities. This is absolutely untrue. My opponent brings up a faulty claim without evidence. Growing mature wouldn't cause women to lose interest in physical activities. This is why professional female soccer players, tennis players, and wrestlers exist (these are only couple of examples). Women still have interest in sports. Women, like men, enjoy physical activities. " I am a woman too. I do a ton of physical activities (sports). But I am thirteen. I have not fully grown in my physical body futures! !! I play every sport (basketball, softball/baseball, tennis, volleyball, soccer) except wrestling (and boxing and Lecross). Main reason is because I don't want to hurt anything. Sure, you get hurt playing basketball, but the goal of the game is not to tear someone to the ground. I'd like to mention that Pro is 14 according to his profile, she should know what I mean. Secondly I'd like to make it known that women wrestling is considered awful, even by pro people on a wrestling forum. Read what they say here: [1] Too physical means awkwardly weird and the sport is generally (and obviously) uncomfortable for everyone, the spectators and the players! [2], [3] R2. "Additionally, Women Wrestling is actually quite popular. A YouTube video called, "Top 10 Female Wrestlers," currently has over 17 million views and 23,000 likes! [1] Many people actually enjoy spectating female wrestling because it is fun and exciting. On the other hand, sewing has no intense rivalries and matches. Watching someone sew is clearly not exciting. " YouTubers say nothing on the scale of popularity. Admit it, whenever you watch a video you are either bored or have to do it for education (school). A YouTube video has no say in this debate because it doesn't prove that women wrestling is entertaining, in fact if anything, it proves against your proposition. It is lame and not useful in any way. R3. "There are approximately 237,868 victims of sexual assaults, each year. [3] Female wrestling might actually decrease the amount of sexual assaults. If women were to learn wrestling, they would be capable of defending themselves from rapists. " I doubt that. As you said, women have already started wrestling, but it is most definitely not the same as men's wrestling. There are better sports that could teach self defense, but wrestling would not do that well. Women should take Karate or something, instead! Men sewing would calm them down, help them stop and think about morality, and from the way you put it, could stop sexual abuse. R4. "I also feel that the whole "men are stronger than women" thing is quite unfair. Once women start wrestling, they would be just as physically strong as men. " Oh and by the way I am a female. What you just said is an utterly incorrect assumed proposition. But you contradict yourself by suggesting that women ARE as strong as men. If you believe this, then what is the use of wrestling? Compared to men stitching, it is a waste of time. Earlier, you made an assumed proposition that went something like this: A) Women are sexually abused. B) Women will be more able to defend if they learn to wrestle. C) Therefore, if women learn to wrestle they won't be sexually abused as much. Voters, you can decide if this works. R5. "Yes, men might earn a few dollars from stitching and selling their products. Don't forget that professional female wrestler would earn more money. Tickets to the wrestling stadium allow women wrestlers to earn a lot of money (due to the fact that there are a lot of spectators in wrestling). " Exactly. Wrestling is dumb because it just gives females in a better position in money, but is that good for anyone? All those people who pay to see lame performance of women wrestling and then they have less money! If men sewed more they would not only provide for themselves but it would give resources (clothing and accessories) to others. Men stitching most certainly provides more resources than women wrestling! R6. "I completely argee. But, I'd like to ask my opponent one question: Why sewing? Men would rather watch football or baseball than sewing. Men have several hobbies [4]. .. but why stitching? " If you know what I mean, men can get aggressive at the TV. Spectating sports, as you suggested, would put them in a position of stress and anger rather than relaxation and it would not give them a break. I'm saying that men stitching would take those males away from their normal routine of hobbies and give them a new perspective on peace and fun things to do. R7. "My opponent contradicts herself. During her second paragraph, she clearly mentions, "I understand how watching women wrestle would be more entertaining. .. " Thus, this argument is invalid. " No. Obviously women wrestling would be MORE entertaining than watching men try to sew! But it is not invalid to argue that women wrestling still isn't very entertaining. Thank you for your time! This has been laughably. .. fun. Good luck Pro. Sources: [1] . http://forums.wrestlezone.com... [2] Ugh! ! . http://smithplanet.com... [3] . http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com...