Abortion

First id like to say is your welcome ma'am secoundly im sorry if im vauge do to grammer english is not my best of subjects.Alas i'll try my best. #1 Even taking into account that only 1/5 women who seek abortion are teens, we still have to keep in mind that sometimes contraception fails, rape occurs, etc. and that accounts for many of the pregnancies in that 1/5 demographic. Nevertheless, even if we are to believe Con that unwanted pregnancy occurs only or mostly to irresponsible teens (which I've already proven is untrue), it still doesn't explain why abortion should be illegal. Even if irresponsible teens made up 90% of the people who sought abortions, I still don't understand why it shouldn't be an option. Con never explains this. If his answer is "they don't deserve it" or "to teach them a lesson"... or anything along those lines... he'll have a really hard time defending why he thinks the State is responsible for parenting its citizens. Well ma'am if you actually read my arugment i actually proved as teens got older they stopped using condoms and etc. #2a 1B. Con's second argument sounds something like this: ""No life should be taken,without probable cause." that statement automatically ruled out rape even accidentally got pregnant with the condom and pill is also a probable cause. That one statement had a meaning and may i ask why this statement must be defended when its quiet obvious , kill someone with out a just,cause is wrong." Obviously I cannot make any sense of this statement whatsoever, but will try to refute it as best I can despite the grammatical errors making it nearly impossible to grasp. I suppose my response to this would have to be that Con seems to defend abortion in the case of rape, but not accidents. This of course is an easy argument to tear. If Con's contention is that no life should be taken (because life is sacred) then why should the life suffer just because it came into fruition via a rape? For instance, if my mom's pregnancy with me resulted in a rape, should I be punished or held accountable even though it wasn't my fault or choice? That is the distinction that permissible abortion in rape cases only makes. Ma'am i belive that in the law,and also common sense that taking a life is wrong with out a cause is just common sense thats why when people kill people they go to jail or sentenced to death. Also accidents and rape are two different things, definitions: Rape:Forced sexual intercourse Sex:Is i chose to have sexual intercourse with this person So accidents are still their fault they should take responsiblitiy for their actions, may i also ask why you cut your own case down you are pro choice therfore you writing this make no sense. I don't argree with abortion in anyway,but rape could happen to anybody and may cause problems like : medical or in terms of money and ruining their life as a person. They did not have intercourse willingly so they have a choice because those who raped them didn't give them one. Example:Carmen is a 18 year old getting ready for college, one day gets raped and will be forced to drop out of college to pay for the babies needs, she of course my perferd option adpotion,or abortion to save her life from working in taco bell all her life. This is ok because she had no choice in her pregnacy,but people who have sex to have it and have accidents do should not have this privlage. #2b Moreover, if people can only get legal abortions in cases of rape, I feel this is enough to presume that more accusations of rape will begin to occur - whether they're true or not. A woman would lie and say she was raped just to get a legalized abortion, which could have devastating effects on innocent men. As technolgy has advanced we can tell if someone was raped or not any other dribble would be a he said she said. #3 Right there we can see that "consciousness" is part of the definition at a mental or medical level. Animals are not privileged to human rights because they do not posses human consciousness. Similarly, if a living, developing human being has not yet developed consciousness, then it has not yet reached personhood and thus not subject to a person's rights A developing human being , so if i cut out someones eyes before they develop them that makes it ok? Because he didn't grow them yet or prehaps there legs. #3b consider the fact that our legal system does not require a father to pay child support to a woman while she is pregnant with the fetus. Instead, the man is required to pay child support once the baby is born. May i ask ma'am why pay for somthing that isn't in need of money yet like for clothes,food,toys,and etc. [ Pro's Arguments Contd. / Re-cap ] Rights you say, no its not, if you rob a bank you go to jail, not to say im comparing but if you have sex to have sex and get pregnant you should have to deal with it. The robber lost his rights after being thrown in jail, why shouldn't a person who gets pregnant just cause she wanted to have sex or whatever the sitution when it envoles their will. Ending statment There are rights you have and some you earn, killing is killing no matter how you twist logic to make it not to be murder but think what if you were that person who could have been.