911 inside job

Hello again. Id just like to say real quick that I'm terribly sorry but I have been extremely busy and beyond tired over the last few days so this next round is going to be way shorter then I wanted and a bit rushed.Alright lets get started. "Because its white hot we can estimate the temperature to be 1100 to 1200 degrees Celsius"This is a bit of a problem because we cant know for 100% certainty what that temperature was. Some people, like you for instance, say it looks white hot and others think it looks less. I for one think it looks more yellowish in color and a good view of that would be at 00:07 of your video. That would put the temperature to around 900-1050 ish. In either case what we don't have here is direct indisputable proof of molten steel. So this does not prove anything. "No one has been able to recreate the orange/yellow color of the molten material with the use of aluminium and any other metal,organic substance or other substance."This just isn't true. While it is true that aluminium, in its pure uncontaminated state at a certain temperature, does burn silvery in color there has been tests that show that at higher temperatures and with contaminants that it will turn yellowish and even come close to orange in color. Please see this following website for study.https://www.google.com...On to the questions you answered.Q1"There were Incendiary which were used to melt the steel columns around the plane impact.The second explosives were nanothermite which are explosive in nature and not incendiary"This makes no sense. Why would they use 2 separate types of thermite? If they've already melted the columns what's the point and as I stated before there is no way they would have been able to know where exactly the plane would have hit in order to accurately in place the thermite. This idea that regular thermite was used in the upper floors also negates your nanothermite theory because with the nanothermite at least you had some explanation of how it was hidden from all the employs. Someone would have notice thermite charges in their building. If not that they would have noticed the holes in the walls or the freshly over plastered spots in the walls or something. You cant just in place vast amounts of thermite charges in a busy skyscraper without someone noticing. I would also like to contest the theory of nanothermite since there is no proof whatsoever other then theory's that nanothermite existed at the time. Also no form of thermite explodes. Thermite burns. This also debunks the claim that people heard explosions prior to the collapse. You have also missed a crucial part of the thermite theory and that is that thermite can NOT burn through a vertical column. The fireproofing upgrades are hardly grounds for evidence of a conspiracy and the idea that the nanothermite was inside the material and applied in secret is just silly.https://www.google.com...https://www.google.com...Q2 Again someone would have noticed and this just doesn't add up. Why place the charges all over the building? They could have simply placed them in the bottom of the building and it would have been find. Q3 No proof or evidence was given.Q4 They wouldn't have needed to place them all over the building just in the basement. And our security isn't all that great. They could have easily played the scenario I gave. I agree that the planes hitting was extremely emotional. But a bomb in the basement still would have brought down the towers and still would have gotten their point across.Q5 As I said earlier this is not proof of molten steel as all we have here is individuals perception of what they see. And more people say nay on the molten steel then those that say thermite. Also even if this was molten steel it still isn't direct indisputable proof of thermite. I'm sorry but that's really all I have time for, I'm literally falling asleep as I type this. I had a lot more planned out for this round but I guess Ill just have to save it for the next one.