Walt Disney is Cryogenically Frozen (and will be thawed in the near future)

“The near future for an adult might be ten years, while the near future for a child may be ten minutes” I accept the proposed standard of ten years. “Muscle stem cells can remain viable in human cadavers for up to 17 days … new knowledge affirming that Walt could indeed be brought back to life” A 17 day window to be able to recover stem cells frozen with the latest technology, and Walt is well past 17,000 days. I fail to see the bridge in logic. “cryonic temperatures could preserve a patient for the future when a cure for the disease, and the tissue damage caused my the freezing state, are discovered.” Far future, indeterminate future, or near future? If not attempting to move the goalpost, this leaves a very short time window truly massive medical advancements. Currently people still lose limbs to frostbite, the cellular damage which makes such necessary can just as easily happen inside a severed head. “I would like to extend my argument concerning the prehistoric virus” Again: “No evidence has been laid out to suggest that Walt Disney is a virus.” “viruses are cells, human tissue is made up of cells.” Trees are also made of cells, this does not bridge the gap to making them relevant. Marc Eliot’s “award winning biography” Over a dozen books, and he wins only a single award. This does not take the author being award winning as above an Appeal to False Authority Fallacy [7]. Further Roy Disney’s alleged quote remains unsupported, or as already stated “there is no record of Roy ever having spoken of his brother's alleged interest in cryonics” [3]. Marc Eliot’s Amazon.com review: “Mosely is careful to confirm each fact…” Trying to raise the authority of the sources by the two authors liking each other, still hits the same problem of: If Mosely is to be “believed, Walt Disney was insisting against medical advice of the time that his cancerious lung had to be put back into place; while at the same time had the rest of the body cremated.” “the biographical literature I have referenced” “Those five sources are not connected to any argument points,” they were just tossed in at the last minute without sign of them having been read first. For example the cooks.dntv.com one concludes with “Mushrooms are more like a treasure chest that needs to be opened, rather than the cure for cancer.” The debate.org one is the opinion section, hardly “biographical literature.” The provided Snopes.com one clearly quoted the American Cancer Society as stating “it is not a cure for glioblastoma or any other cancer based on these results.” “Snopes.com is a Scam” First of all you’re now attacking your own sources. Second the source against Snopes.com is a conspiracy theory blog, which uses such evidence against the validity of Snopes.com as the writers being Jewish: “Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are jewish - very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal” (pro’s source, not mine). Third a scam to do what in the context of Disney? Head Transplants: “Actually, an italian neurosurgion has recently stated that such a procedure is now possible” Quite aware of this, as I already quoted Dr. Sergio Canavero stating there’s a one hour time limit: “As the human brain can only survive without oxygen for one hour, the surgeons would have to remove both heads and connect the recipient's head to the circulatory system of the donor body within this time frame” [5]. Further my opponents source in one of the few differences from my own, clearly states between 11-14 seconds into the video “a full head transplant, may one day be possible.” One day, as opposed to any day soon. It’s already taken about 40 years since last time they tried on a monkey, to get this this far again [5]. “I still affirm that Walt Disney was the kind of person who would have tried new things.” Even if he tried this new thing (which we can only guess at), there would remain serious hurdles. 1. Him being the first, his suspension would among the least likely to have been successful. 2. He would likely be among the last to be revived, as he would require the most advanced repair. 3. Cancer has not been cured. 4. Old age has not been reversed. 5. Head transplants are still far from human trails, in addition to his apparent insistence that the diseased lung must be put into the new body. 6. Perhaps most importantly, there are currently no signs of how to restore function and memories to the damaged brain. Sources: [7] http://rationalwiki.org...