Gay Marriage

Introduction by Con and its address: Con writes:" The first question we ask is not, Should Gay marriage be legal, or allowed." (Address) Yes; it is the very first question that should be asked, and answered. It is not legal, and allowing it should be question on the simple fact the idea start with public plagiarizing of something know by law to have self-value. KNOWN BY LAW. Law. Explanation to begin, if not completely answered will follow as point made under title Con (A). The second question might be: "Should Gay Marriage be federally encouraged or promoted by government?" With two guidelines: answered under title Con (B) the response will include the challenge made on bedroom etiquette, and bedroom privacy. 1.Gay marriage ought to be promoted. 2.The government would do a good job at promoting gay marriage. (Address) Principle of Con is stating government should stay out of the bedroom, this suggesting that immigration of population through the woman"s use of reproduction should be granted full legal immunity to law. While a united State created by sexual assault confirms otherwise. (Precedent) And no mention that all children are in fact not conceived by male female contact as couples in a bedroom only. This second question translated from a union made with the first question, and the United State Constitution, to be rewritten as just one new question addressing all three states. In a way that is impossible to make personal, as it is already personal (Additional Address) Perjury should be promoted by the federal government as being legal for intelligent people only. As plagiarism openly is the intellectual"s crime. Con"s search for a legalized gay, lesbian, same sex extensions of (marriage) formed response (C) with a test to find crime committed by the plagiarizing, the crime chosen from a list of possibilities, Perjury. It is the one with transferred ability publicly. Meaning all people can easily be in fact committing perjury, just like me as a witness brought under a united State, by request of law. This crime one of the hardest crimes written into law that a person can prove against someone, unless the person who lied confessed to the crime. This form of perjury is cast into the public domain. "I am making that confession", as I have lied by order of my City, and Governing State trapped in bias enforcement of law created by use, and threat of civil litigation, insisting I perjure. The goal of the perjury was to place an incentive by threat, to finding a legal precedent, in a test to constitution that could hold no legal precedent alone, as the two positions in question are completely opposite states. Con (A): Buildingapologetics my colleague in this debate is to take on the daunting task of addressing recognition to Homosexuality as choice only. Good luck. Then not negate an accusation made by a person with two sides, one vicious, and another innocent. Again best of luck. Two states not one, vicious and mean are one state shared by a union made public, while innocent and playful are a second state. This type delicate public matter required that a United States Constitutional separation may need to intervene. In matters of State. If not all the time, at least it stand ready part time to resolve a conflicts of idea. First Amendment exorcise thereof, free-press, free-speech a word which holds no set-value as single definition has multi meaning publicly. Two states and the public need for separation of those two basic principle of state trapped inside the direction of two words Gay and Lesbian. As the United States Constitution holds the only written separation of a word and state in the world. Nick named "Separation of Church and State." For the sake of law we are asked to presumed innocence on others, not our selves" morality. Not for ourselves on the scope of legal test, morality. While questioning my own morality I will admit to having been accused of Homosexuality, having been call f_g, gay, and homo by more than one woman, and in instigation to aggression by more than one man. In life we might all find this accusation even cast by people we do not expect woman, men, family members, people who have held friendship and trust. I have knowledge of knowing at least one woman who I accused of being lesbian, and was not, and a woman I believe not lesbian, who in fact was. I knew men I believe not to be gay and who had been, and those who have lied saying they are when in fact were not. I watched woman say they are knowing they are not. I have heard confessions made by woman and men of being gay and lesbian accordingly. The United State these examples share, opinion a person may hold on privacy, sexual intimacy, or as a visible result to be punished by innuendo, then adding misunderstanding within what is seen. Complication. There are no new crimes that are exposed here just old basic crimes of jealousy, or hatred. Con (B) So I admit to being Gay, and now claim I was accused. How is legislated promotion of plagiarizing Marriage publicly going to help me? How is it going to help anyone? It can only help those who are stealing credit, this is what plagiarism does. It steals credit from something else. What value is the credit taking? Why would government want to promote use of public plagiarism in any fashion? Men and woman create babies when sexually interment. With, or without marriage. This gives a legal reason to ask openly from the public if this one man has been seen with this one woman. The answer of yes will start a reasonable line of request which will end when it finds a creator of citizen, not baby, newborn, son or daughter. Citizen he or she belongs with us now. At liberty with all of us. This is okay for many social reasons but does point out issues. There are new legal reason to ask what a man and woman do intimately alone, in the form of relinquishing parenthood right to others, or aid others the powers to create a citizen. I will not address it here in detail, but will say a number of laws can be put to test by this transfer of power given out by men and woman. UnosMulier and Binivir are verbal separations, confirmations of a type private agreement that need no consummation, a specialized form of witnessing by public witness, a need to place the couple in proximity of each other for sexually activity is not needed, being told a witness must be seen standing close enough to I.D, an idea of union of verbal agreement with no child as consequence is stealing credit for creation of offspring, and bearing new citizen. Not providing such citizen. This is not the same as saying stand close enough to witness by others may see marriage, a visible sign, a display of compassion, willingness to start foundations of human life. Relieve the governing state of it governing power, and express your independent life, liberty, and happiness that has granted you by nature. If not by family, society, and friends this liberty. Marriage is all about the Governments right to citizen ship, babies are the new entry as U.S. Citizens, the addition to current population, and addition to economy of a Country, as this is also a test going on in immigration right now. What is call by Military distress "Real Time." http://immigration.findlaw.com... Naturalized Citizen " One who, being born an alien, has lawfully become a citizen of the United States Under the constitution and laws. https://www.lectlaw.com... State " A state of meaning might be described as a line made between two points. (john_c_1812) State VERB express something definitely or clearly in speech or writing. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com... Perjury - https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com... Addressing closing remarks for point (C) There is no legal reason under any condition to describe anything as marriage, other than what is see as marriage. What goes on outside of civil basic principle as coaching witness, or threating of witness does not matter. Men and woman can make babies, and this can set a precedent of common law marriage publicly. Any consummation of human life that identical couple, same gender couples may create, or share with the public will take place on medically consent, not social consent. It will take place by relinquishing the right given to a person by nature, and placing it knowingly as a right for someone else, who in fact also by nature may, or may not on their own create new life on behalf of United States, or any Country. Closing of round Two: Chose to use the collected human fuel as pool of life created by others. Embryo and sperm (The rules of the baby game have changed) Addressing point (C) will at this point move past my own confession of guilt of perjury, and confront, take on, look at plagiarism with use of wording like Binivir, UnosMulier, Unosfemina, VirFemina and VirMulier distance me form my perjury, and others plagiarism. The only reason identical sex marriage ought to be recognized by state is the plagiarism as any consummation it is null and void to the two states. This debate may really be a sophisticated form of dissolving a credit made by private form of childbirth, so that a legal immunity may be translated from limited groups of public, to a much larger scientific industry, as couples are compelled to make donations to expand their own natural power against a nation for the lives of our loved ones. As the power to create a child in natural has greater value when sold, or given. The plagiarism is not mine, I don"t own it.