Is God(Christian) a standard of morality to follow

Once again, thank you for your time and your rebuttal of which I will expose in detail. My contender BoggyB seems to be confused as to the topic here which is...Is the Christian God Yahweh a role model of morality to follow or not. BoggyB seems to be saying that since God made living animals and humans then it is moral for Yahweh to murder humans and animals as he pleases for whatever reason he pleases. I am not arguing that an all powerful god has the -ability- to murder animals and humans, my contention is that these acts of genocide and infanticide are not a standard of morality that any person or society should emulate. We have laws to protect the defenseless in modern society. We have laws that prohibit a parent from killing their child regardless if they were the one that brought them into this world or not. The reason we have laws against such abominable acts is because humans have actually argued in the past that since a parent brought the child into this world,he has the right to kill his child whenever he pleases. I am actually stunned that I am having to argue this stance that BoggyB has taken. But here goes....My stance is ...No, you are wrong. Every child has at least one right and that is the right to live. A world in which you can murder your children whenever it suits you is completely divorced from any sense of morality. And it is certainly not a world in which I would want to live in. We are here debating the morality of actions. And as I said before any human being today that committed mass genocide on children, infants, and animals as did Yahweh in the flood story would be deemed heinously and pathologically evil and put to death. When we talk about this Yahweh character most of the subject material is derived from the Old Testament. Which is full of the stories of mass death, carnage, and slavery that Yahweh inflicted and promoted amongst us humans. Even though Jesus did come along to clean up Yahweh's horrible actions, but it is to no avail because in that book called the Bible we read the passages which state that Yahweh can never change. He is always the same, today tomorrow and forever everlasting. So in essence we can distal from this that Yahweh is pathological, devoid of any hope of rehabilitation and will continue to forever be a bloodthirsty, pathological serial killer, murderer, genocidal, infanticidal maniac, who kills, tortures, and obliterates human lives, no matter whether it is a man a woman, the elderly, the children, infants, newborn babies, or even animals who could in no way be imputed of crime. What crimes did the newborns and animals commit to deserve being killed in one of the most horrible ways imaginable. Drowning to death as accounted for in the biblical Flood story. Or being burned alive by fire and brimstone in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah? BoggyB....please answer for humanity what an infant or a baby animal did to deserve being horribly murdered this way by a entity(Yahweh) which you have asserted to be the standard of morality? And you take issue with my statement that scribes who wrote down these words which praise this sick monstrous entity did so under duress of divine punishment from Yahweh, or corporal punishment by the tribes in which they reside. Well, I'm sorry to tell you BoggyB but fear of punishment and death whether by divine or human hands can actually persuade people to praise bad people. Like I stated before...one must only watch a documentary of North Korean citizens who are shaking and hands trembling as they tell the camera crew that Kim Jon Il is the most gracious ruler of their country and they love him. But statements under duress are not to be taken seriously. If I put a gun to your head and tell you to read a script which states that I am a lovable human being and everything I do I do out of kindness. You will read that script and swear to the truth of it or else. This is called statements being made under duress. And speaking of statements made under duress, I claim that all of your statements you make in defending this sick monstrous, genocidal maniac of an entity are made under duress as well. Out of fear of eternal flames. Therefore I assert that anything that comes out of your mouth by statement or by pen, is too be taken with no seriousness whatsoever, on grounds that you are making these statements out of an inborn fear of eternal flames that you were told awaits you if you do not defend the faith. Therefore I condemn your fear and cowardliness to take a brave position against this immoral entity called Yahweh, which by biblical depiction is by far the most evil thing the universe ever has produced, yet you snivel in fear for the safety of your soul, over your imagination and you sell your soul to a fictional serial killer in return, and you have done all this to save your own hide at the plight of your fellow human beings. And Shame on you for that. No statue has ever been erected for a coward. The ultimatum that you as a Christian have swallowed and then attempt to push on the masses is comparable to the ultimatum given by the mafia boss. Either accept my protection or else. And this is not love. You pervert the word love itself by even associating it with this scenario. So I don't care which verses you cherry pick out of the bible to make a claim that god really is just protecting us and loves us. Because in that very same book it delineates what the punishment is for not accepting the ultimatum and loving Yahweh back. Eternal torture by hellfire. Agreements to this ultimatum are not born out of love, they are born out of fear. The same fear that law abiding citizens have of the mafia boss who is running a racket on the surrounding community. How could you defend this as a standard of morality to follow. Once again shame on you. Christians believe their God is all-good and all-loving. Atheists counter that, according to Christian"s own Bible, God is instead "the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, felicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully. In Genesis 7:21-23, God drowns the entire population of the earth: men, women, children, fetuses, and animals. In Exodus 12:29, God the baby-killer slaughters all Egyptian firstborn children and cattle because their king was stubborn. In Numbers 16:41-49, the Israelites complain that God is killing too many of them. So, God sends a plague that kills 14,000 more of them. In 1 Samuel 6:19, God kills 50,000 men for peeking into the ark of the covenant. In Numbers 31:7-18, the Israelites kill all the Midianites except for the virgins, whom they are allowed to rape as spoils of war. In 2 Kings 2:23-24, some kids tease the prophet Elisha, and God sends bears to dismember them. And the atrocities go on and on. BoggyB says that because God is God, he can do whatever he wants. So, if he wants to violently destroy an entire nation of innocent people, he is morally allowed to do so. But what kind of "morality" is this? How awful! BoggyB really seems to believe that even things like genocide and rape can be moral if God feels like it. BoggyB made statements to this effect. "God gave us life, and he can take it away when he wants." How atrocious. When scientists are able to create new living beings that have desires and can feel pain, will we then be morally permitted to torture, rape, dismember, and murder them if we feel like it? This seems to be what BoggyB is arguing. This debate in which BoggyB defends a genocidal maniac as the most morally perfect being who ever existed, is a perfect example of how dogma can twist even the most hopeful of human minds.