Baby-killers (AKA "Abortionists") Deserve the Death Penalty

"Malice is an emotional state" Perhaps, Malice more accurately is, the intention do evil. Although you do attempt to establish the idea of malice being considered in assault charges. "For example, if someone attacks you, and then you hit back in self-defense, then you will probably be excused." Here you're attempting to establish that the motive behind the assault is important when establishing the sentencing handed down. Therefore it is also reasonable to expect the establishment of intent of the mother to be just as, if not more important when attempting to establish that the woman is guilty of a crime that is serious enough in nature to warrant the death penalty, which is what you should be attempting to establish. Again, following you're line of logical conclusion, if the intent of the assault was self-defense than the motive lacked malice, the accused wasn't acting under the intention to deliberately harm the assaulted. But was acting in his own self-interest. So if that is the case in an assault charge, you also need to establish grounds for EVERY abortion to be carried out with some malicious intent. If you cannot prove that ALL ABORTIONS are malicious in nature then your argument is weak at best, and more than likely the result of multiple fallacies. One example of an abortion carried out without establishing malicious motive would be in the event of a threat to the woman's own life. Her care provider makes her aware of a complication in the pregnancy that is life threatening and she is faced with a choice, carry on with the pregnancy risking her own life, or seek an abortion, which if your opinion were law would result in her death either way. AGAIN: ***Baby-killers (AKA "Abortionists") Deserve the Death Penalty*** your argument establishes that woman who get abortions are "Baby-killers" and deserve to be put to death. Not some, not a few, not one, just ABORTIONISTS deserve death... which is once again an absolute and is ultimately why your argument fails to hold water. Also, I'll take a little extra time to unpack your appeal to emotions fallacy, the response itself is not the fallacy, in attempting to paint EVERY abortion as the dismemberment of the baby by, "Tearing her body limb from limb using razor-sharp stainless steel implements" is an appeal to the emotions of your readers by misrepresenting how abortions are conducted by misrepresenting that it is the only way an abortion is carried out. By not fleshing out the various manners in which an abortion is undertaken you're attempting to establish in your reader a sense of disgust in that one procedure instead of sticking to the impartial facts of various abortion techniques used you weaken the credibility of your statement by attempting to influence an emotional response. It has nothing to do with my lack of desire to read about, and everything to do with educating you on how to properly identify a fallacy. You make mention of a doctors vows. It can be argued and easily established that 1. The vow you're referring to is not LAW 2. There is no legal demand that every doctor must take these vows and 3. The modern day vows established by the American Medical Association (found here: https://www.ama-assn.org...) makes no mention of the vow to do no harm, and furthermore make no mention directly related to abortions. (Again, argue in the facts, not your emotional feelings of the topic.) It is true that there may be interpretations that attempt to establish that the original oath, known as the Hippocratic Oath, makes mention of doing intentional harm and does refer to abortions in some translations, however this oath is both outdated, and is not typically the vow taken by modern day practitioners. At this point it's rather obvious you have no real argument to establish, or any ability to articulately express any factual evidence to support your claim and are more interested in patting yourself on the back in some vain attempt to self-establish your ideology, thus falsely reinforcing and justifying your beliefs. We'll finish the debate for debates sake, regardless of your continued shouting "I WIN, I WIN!" But again, congrats?