Waste not, want not: it's time to initiate the international trade in human flesh

My opponent appears to suffer from the common issue of "partial knowledge" and that indeed is the cause of his downfall (that and the banana peel I placed discreetly). Wikipedia, on the other hand, is a source of partially useless knowledge, from whence I unearthed this gem which will assist me in disproving my opponent's contention-The word placenta comes from the Latin word for cake[1] I hope my opponent now realizes wherefrom all the hype behind eating placentas originated. However, I believe that my opponent is qualified enough to know that a word root is not the same as the word itself. Had Kim Kardashian been provided a decent education (which the third word countries lack as well), she could have concluded this all by herself. But that is beside the point, when my opponent informs me that Kim Kardashian would happily lap up semi-solid paste of human cadavres in various stages of rot, I can assure him that no one [not even Kim] could be happier [than me] to know it. Thus, we can safely conclude that as long as we mark cans of human meat with the word "cake", our business is going to be taken seriously. As the audience might have noted, my opponent even provided us with brand names for such products if marketed in different parts of our planet- and as if that wasn't enough - he arranged them alphabetically. Now, I am sure that you noticed how, in the manner of an escort who abruptly ends her ecstatic orgasm at the end of her paid hours, my opponent in a most anti-climactic manner rubbished these ideas claiming them to be a niche market. Again, I would like to reference Steve Jobs, who was similarly ridiculed for introducing an iPad- not that I am endorsing Apple products in any imaginable sense- yet that particular anecdote is a matter of convenience. My opponent has now twice proved himself to be a worthy successor of Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. Perhaps, instead of day dreaming about his "flesh for agriculture" initiative, he should apply as a CEO in Microsoft. The reasons as to why the proposed enterprise would be successful-i. Cannibalism is rare and is not illegal in most countries. People who eat human flesh are usually charged with crimes other than cannibalism, such as murder or desecration of a body. [2]Hence, laws will not have to be modified comprehensibly. ii. After men acquire a taste for human meat, the demand for corpses will exponentially increase and ridiculous amounts of money would be spent on fresh corpses. Most of the residents of the third world countries would sell their young bodies in return for large sums of currency in order to support their families- however, this money wouldn't stay in their hands for long due to heavy taxes imposed by their governments. In nearly 20-30 years, after old men and women in third world countries would have become extinct, the average equilibrium age would settle down to 35-45 years. Thus, humanity would finally embrace its age old dream of remaining young forever. In any case, fresh corpses would always be in demand and to supplement this demand, the amount of procreation in third world countries would increase- essentially developing a vicious cycle. But I'm sure this will be a niche market for a long time to come and the main value in recycled relatives will be in fertilizer and fish food. Opponent's claim has been refuted. iii. Developed countries would continue to savour the taste of human flesh- even reducing the consumption of other kinds of meat such as tuna. This tuna woould instead be devoured by the now sufficiently prosperous residents of the third world, and the governments of these countries - after having stolen enough money from the state coffers- would start to use the currency obtained from heavy tax collections for the common good. Thus, the infrastructure and economy of third world countries would start to improve. iv. A time would come, when the third world countires would be fully developed- and let us call this the tipping point- at this point of time, these countries would decide to stop selling the fresh corpses of their young citizens (and stop killing them as well). However, the demand for human flesh would still be very high- since the initially-developed-countries would, by now, have been habituated to eating it. Thus, to supplement this deficiency, they would start devouring from their own- perhaps, even disintegrating into anarchy. All of this, however, is beyond the point. I have given sufficient proof that such an enterprise would be profitable enough. I hope my opponent can see the light of the day and switch to the side of a cannibalistic future. Thank you. [1] . https://en.wikipedia.org...[2] . https://en.wikipedia.org...