DC Comics: At their prime, Batman is a better vigilante than Green Arrow PART II

First off, I'd like to say that this is a wonderful debate. I would first like to state that I will be answering the cross-examination points, I'll give somewhat of a summary, and then I'll give the conclusion.Cross-Examination Answers - Con's 1st Question - I would like to argue that this is an invalid question. A general or a soldier doesn't win the war. Their team wins the war. They can't win the war themselves.Con's 2nd Question - I will say that Batman doesn't need anyone as a spouse or partner because of his willpower. His willpower drives him to metahuman levels while Green Arrow-like heroes rely on spouses to make them have a will. What you're essentially arguing is that Green Arrow has more of a will because of his spouse. However, I've already proven that Batman has an amazing willpower which trumps this point.My opponent unfortunately only had two questions. Now I'll give a summary of what my opponent is essentially arguing.My opponent is basically saying that Green Arrow is taking the laws in his own hands by politically influencing the government. However, this is not what a vigilante does but my opponent attempts to make the case that somehow being a vigilante equals being a person using political power to help the city. We are not arguing who benefits the universe more nor who is the better leader. We are arguing who the better vigilante is and a vigilante is someone who takes the law into their own hands. His public life does not affect who he is as a vigilante. It just affects who he is as a person or "hero." Taking the law in the person's own hands is not becoming the lawmaker. Taking the law into the person's own hands is doing what the law can't do instead of changing the law. I've already explained why Batman does not need a spouse and can handle his willpower perfectly fine. Also "cleaning up" doesn't make any person a better vigilante. Cleaning up just trains you for bigger tasks and since Batman has already been trained past that extent, the contention proves that Batman is more trained than Green Arrow. Batman is a better vigilante and having people working with you doesn't make you the better vigilante. Batman has demonstrated the authority and ability to lead the Justice League, as I've proven, and has trained himself to the most impressive bodily strength. As I've said, having a larger base doesn't make you personally a better vigilante. It makes you better at fighting crime. Conclusion -I think it can be realized that my opponent has been making one main argument. This main argument is that being politically invested into Star City makes Green Arrow a better vigilante because he can change the law that's not working and make the city a much better place with more infrastructure and more troops with him as the commander to make sure everything is of quality. However, this is not being the better vigilante in which how my opponent agreed to the definition of "vigilante." This is being the better politician, better commander/leader, better crimefighter, etc. This doesn't prove that he is the better vigilante and I have shown that Batman's conditioning allows him to be possibly the most dangerous human alive because of his capabilities. My opponent has tried to claim that the sourcing should be discounted but I willl state that all this is is to distract the voters from the main issue in which Batman has amazing feats which makes him more capable of taking the law into his own hands. Comic sources are much more valuable and of better quality because it gives in detail what these vigilantes are capable of doing and what they've accomplished. Also my opponent has brought up as a secondary argument of having a spouse. What he truly means is that a spouse gives him more will to do what he does basically. We can see how powerful Batman's willpower is through my first argument and how his willpower is essentially his only power. Vote for Pro. Why?My opponent concedes all of my arguments.I dispute my opponent's arguments in which we are both arguing about.Not only that, but my opponent has dropped two of his main arguments which are Green Arrow's archery skills and Conner Hawke's martial arts skills.Therefore, the winner is the one who's arguments stand and my arguments stand strong as my opponent has conceded them.