Adopt China's Planned Birth Policy Globally

They gave me a good laugh. Let's go through them paragraph by paragraph to critically analyze them. ----- First paragraph: You so soundly say that overpopulation is a serious issue, but then say that you would instead find other solutions. Well, what other solutions besides birth control prevent more births? Is that not the definition of birth control? You yourself said that abortion shouldn't be used, so again. If my plan is ineffective, and abortion isn't either, how else can we prevent overpopulation? I find this argument rather ridiculous therefore debunking the rest of your support for it. However, I am considerate so I will see to responding to your following paragraphs. Second paragraph: Yes, perhaps prevention of children is unnatural now, but to that I provide two arguments. One, should unnaturalness mean the extinction of the human species? And two, why is China not revolting to this policy? John Phillip Sousa denounced the record player and Bill Gates once thought the personal computer to be intangible, so perhaps now it seems odd. But you yourself do not refute the grave seriousness of overpopulation, so would a small pay in, really not be expected to survive? Another point you make, is that family survival would be "greatly reduced". What happened to human survival that you so soundly supported? And to add to that, in a modern society, family survival is no longer a real question in many people's mind. Third paragraph: Are you honestly stating that families run our modern day farming society? Modern agriculture is actually run by machines, illegal immigrants, and truckers. I doubt the hundreds of people working in the fields in a farm are all blood related. Heck, I doubt that more than a few are related to the owners if that. We live in this thing called the twenty-first century. Please remember that next turnaround. Fourth paragraph: What crabjuicer does here, is provide no evidence or logic. We already are vastly approaching the big seven, and we have yet to find an answer. As stated before, by 2050 we'll have a third more minds. Yes significant, but do we really want to postpone half a century just to increase the chances of one genius getting an epiphany no one has thought about before? Why not act now, and NOT gamble with our chances? It's only logical. Fifth paragraph: You are correct that no method is perfect. However, if the girl takes the pill, the guy uses a condom, and they both have had sex education, at most, there is only a .04% chance they could possibly get a baby for a whole year using the highest statistics to be found. Combine this with other methods, and it is virtually impossible for the girl to get pregnant. So again, nothing is perfect, but things can be prevented to save the human species. ----- Here is where the debate stands: 1. We both agree on the point that overpopulation is a serious issue. The only difference lies that I believe action needs to be taken, while crabjuices believes that we should take other actions besides abortion and birth control. He has not provided what actions besides waiting half a century. 2. Other minor jabs have been made including the discovery that crabjuices is not knowledgeable about modern agriculture. ----- In conclusion, I have provided evidence to show that overpopulation is a serious issue that needs to be addressed. I believe we need birth control, while crabjuices believes that we should take other actions that our as of now secret to himself. Voters, realize the argument that is baseless here.