The Universe has always existed

The Universe according to and old man. "come now, I will tell you--- and bring away my story safely when you have heard it--- the only ways of inquiry are to think: the one, that it is and that it is not possible for it not to be, the path of Truth, the other, that it is not and the necessary for it not to be, this I point out to you to be a path completely unlearnable, for neither may you know that which is not, nor may you declare it." Parmenides of Elea 500 BCEThe Fool: The message is simple. What IS IS, and what IS not cannot be known. For it is not there to know about and so not there to claim. What IS IS the universe. It could never be what is not, because it is. (Sounds almost trivial but itâ€™s a really strong argument.) Zilch!!When we think of nonexistence we often think of blackness. But blackness or darkness is something. Itâ€™s a default color when there is no light hitting our eyes. Notness is not even that, it cannot be thought of, for even that would exist in the form of an idea or thought. But all ideas would be something but we are talking about absolutely nothing. If you had brain damage causing a blind spot in your vision, and you were looking at somebody, you would see something like a head looking connected to legs, the middle is not dark but literally cut out of perception. That is one thing we could never know is notness therefore notness can never be and explanation, so the universe can only be known to exist. Even the theory my opponent is talking about, depends on something a string or whatever, but something none the less. It does not go from nothing to something. It just goes from something else to another. It doesnâ€™t help to say something is immaterial for our minds are immaterial and they exist, and thus they are in the universe. The universe is not only physical for it is made of relations of physical and mind. The relations of ideas of physical entities are the logical quantifiers. That we don't create logic but rather symbolize (create a language) which reflects relations of reality and this is the same with math. It rather discovering, than creating and that makes it objective. Secondly since we experience the world from our mind, anything possible to know, even the most abstract concept exist at least in the form of and idea. We all understand what I mean when I say 1 or 2 because we share the ideas in which the words relate too. As long as something is there the universe exist. Something cannot from nothing, nor is matter ever created or destroyed, it only changes forms. A form being a different set of relations of matter or mind(idea) The constant changing in the universe need not a first cause for even that would be another change. Bang!!!!!Even the in the big bang theory it only accounts for the beginning of our current empirical world in the way we know it now. What they call the initial stage is not empty universe but a hot condensed state of matter. It is still existing, and moving, for heat is the movement of molecules. the change in stability of energy explains the explosion. Even before the condensation It could have been previously seperated. Elementally Fooled I will here introduce the Elemental fallacy, you never heard of it, because this is fresh philosophy straight from the hill. That is, Elements, are the supposed to be the most basic constituents of matter, Aristotle had mentioned that there were four elements, Earth, wind, fire, water. He was considered to be refuted when we discovered what we now call elements.(oxygen, hydrogen, etc) But technically that should be considered refuted as well since we have found even smaller elements aka sub-atomic particles, but the name stook even though they are not really the small basic element of matter. This same fallacy is done with the universe, where the Universe is supposed to be all things that exist, thus we shouldn't be talking about other universes, for technically they are just parts(sub universes) of THE UNIVERSE. So the same but this is the same elemental mistake but in reverse. So there are no multiple universes for they are only part of the universe. Thus re-establishing that the universe is all that exist. but since but something cannot come from nothing, The universe has always exististed. Review of key points;1. What universe IS and so it could never be what IS NOT because it would be a contradiction to isness. 2. Matter or energy is never created or destroyed. (law of consevation3. Energy is unstabilization (definition of energy)4. The universe is always changing. (always has energy)5. New things are forming and unforming. (unstabilized change of relations of matter and mind)6. The universe is the whole that is all. (via explaintion of elementary fallacy)Therefore the universe has always existed. The Fool on the hill. ;)