Fox News is the Worst News in the US

R1. I'll drop this as it is irrelevant, the NGO's thus far as FAIR we can agree is unbiased. R2. . http://www.youtube.com... Stop the video at 1:26, you can see digital alterations (signs missing, and flags) thus they fully well knew what they were doing and again bended the facts to give the feeling of 'join us because everyone else is'. To write it off as a simple 'background image' only to accuse Jon Stuart as a noted liberal is nonsense. Fact: something that has really occurred or is actually the case. [1] Those images were thus, NOT the case of the same rally, and the fact is Fox altered them and tried to get away with it. Again, sure Bill is just a political commentator, however, your right Bush didn't have anything to do with it, I apologize however it was a minor error and irrelevant. Now with Media Matters, it is still unbiased despite attacking Fox News consistently. First they have done some excellent things outside news as such: "Some news organizations have cited Media Matters reports and credited it for bringing attention to issues including the story ofï¿½James Guckert, formerly a reporter for the web-basedï¿½Talon News. Duringï¿½George W. Bush'sï¿½administration, Guckert gained White House press access using the pseudonym Jeff Gannon and attended 155 White House press briefings. It was revealed that he had also worked as a prostitute soliciting male clientele on the internet with photos of himself fully naked. ï¿½Liberalï¿½op-edï¿½writers such asï¿½Molly Ivinsï¿½andï¿½Paul Krugmanï¿½have cited Media Matters or identified it as a helpful source. " [2] Furthermore, this is not including defeating racism within media as well (see within previous source Don Imus controversy, Phony Soldiers controversy, etc. .. ) to hold media responsible for their comments. Thus, commentary is part of the news and should be held accountable for their biasing as well. For my final point: the War of Fox was not after it's destruction, he took it out of context and stretched the truth. "MMfA also said that changing Fox's behavior, not shutting it down, was its goal. " [3] Finally I shall show this as my opponent has asked, that they actually acknowledged the error ANDthey did provide a reaction . . a rather negative one at that as well. . http://www.foxnews.com... The following link claims that Kevin Jennings said it. Again, as I have shown he DID NOT. . http://www.youtube.com... Furthermore, Hannity himself continued to argue that his associations alone was enough to have him dismissed. Not for what he thinks, not for what he does, but for what his FRIENDS think. CNN did not make this mistake, thus reaffirming that Fox News is the worst news. . http://www.youtube.com... R3. Yes you did, the article you sited from FAIR you claimed showed liberal bias as a source, it did not in any way shape or form, it was to show freedom of speech should not be suppressed regardless of ideology. Your next source, is flawed again. Stalin controlled media and thus we could not have known much about him at that time. (Just one example) So the blog is untrustworthy, same as DDT arguments, and Vietnam War (if you've read Henry Kissinger: A Trial by Christopher Hitchens you will find the bias was in FAVOR of Kissinger, as he has yet to be convicted of war crimes for Vietnam). So because it is a blog it should not be used, your next source -though it pains me to admit- is legit. However, this is a conservative bias. As my opponent used FAIR as a source he admits it's validity, thus he admits as FAIR as stated a conservative bias in media. [4] Again, ï¿½August 20, 1992ï¿½Washington Post, in which Republican party chairï¿½Rich Bondï¿½compared journalists to referees in a sporting match. "If you watch any great coach, what they try to do is 'work the refs. ' Maybe the ref will cut you a little slack next time. " [5] And "A report "Examining the 'Liberal Media' Claim: Journalists' Views on Politics, Economic Policy and Media Coverage" by David Croteau, from 1998, calls into question the assumption that journalists' views are to the left of center in America. The findings were that journalists were "mostly centrist in their political orientation" and more conservative than the general public on economic issues (with a minority being more progressive than the general public on social issues). " [6] Thus not all news is bias, nor are journalists, conservatives seek to control the media. FR. Yet you acknowledged that Red Eye was only satirical, but somehow the tabloids cannot be? As I have shown in the article, a man moving his wife is simply news, but as the national enquirer states as a provocative title "JFK JR GRAVE ROBBER" is nothing more than a joke at best. I know of no one who takes it seriously, nor have you even shown how tabloids are worse. My opponent maintains that occasionally they report real news, sure, in a satirical manner as I have shown! So a politician with an abnormally large nose (satire) is a refutation of fact? We know he does not have a nose like that and thus it is meerly entertainment. Fox covers politics, covers what will happen every day in our lives. Paris Hilton releasing a sex tape does nothing for us (except give us temporary pleasure I suppose), thus Fox is worse. I did not drop the argument of Fox news. com. You provided a valid defence and I applaud you on it, however, I maintain that the errors are still made, and thus, I indirectly refuted it. However if it makes you happy, here is the Kevin Jenning's lies on the internet: . http://mediamatters.org... and . http://video.foxnews.com... (On the Fox Nation which was an article turned video thus disproving Fox on the Internet as a valid news source) Again they acknowledged the mistake, but do they apologize? No, they continue the crusade on this poor man by accusing him of statutory Rape. The argument is over, I hope to show more video's but would be unfair to my opponent and violations of the rules. Thus Fox News is the worst news, and thank you for your time! Vote Pro! Sources: [1] . http://en.wikipedia.org... [2] . http://en.wikipedia.org... [3] . http://en.wikipedia.org... [4] . http://en.wikipedia.org... [5] Washington Post [6] ^ï¿½. http://www.fair.org...