The New Testament Contains No Genuine Contradictions of Consequence

I want to extend a thank you to ReformedArsenal for his attempts at harmonizing the passages. Contradiction 1: From which of David's sons did Jesus descend?The question is more complex than my opponent realises. As a Jew, I understand the transmission of genealogy. My opponent is 100% correct in assertion that the purpose of the genealogies was to establish a legal inheritance. D. A. Carson, in his book, "The New Bible Comentary," correctly notes: "The theory that Luke really gives us the family tree of Mary rather than of Joseph is improbable. The theory with least difficulties is that Matthew gives the descendants of David down the royal line (i.e. who was heir to the throne at any given time), but Luke gives the particular line to which Joseph belonged" [1]Let us now look at some other issues with this. First, Luke made mary a relative of Elizabeth in Luke 1:36, which we know is a descendent from Aaron. Immediately, this makes Mary a member of Aaron and not David. Secondly, the Jews do not transmit birthright by their mother. St. Jerome points out, "It is not the custom of the scriptures to count women in their genealogies." Therefore, a genealogy traced from Mary's side is of no value in determining the descendents from David. [2] Contradiction 2: Was Jesus born of a virgin.The problem, of course, lies in the fact that both father and mother are vital in determining the genealogy, and thus the Messiah. Another fatal flaw is that the whole Virgin Birth theory causes God to sin, however, I will not go into detail with that in this debate.Contradiction 3: What year was Jesus Born?I believe that my opponent brought forth extremely good evidence for my opponent's assertions and therefore, I drop this argument. I will admit that my opponent brought forth good evidence that assums that both dates are wrong. Josephus is considered to be a reliable historian and thus my opponent, is most likely, correct. Contradiction 3: How many animals did Jesus Ride/The Disciples bring back (to replace the last contradiction).A. 2Matthew 21 Now when they drew near to Jerusalem and came to Bethphage, to the Mount of Olives, then Jesus sent two disciples, saying to them, “Go into the village in front of you, and immediately you will find a donkey tied, and a colt with her. Untie them and bring them to me. If anyone says anything to you, you shall say, ‘The Lord needs them,’ and he will send them at once.” This took place to fulfill what was spoken by the prophet, saying, “Say to the daughter of Zion, ‘Behold, your king is coming to you, humble, and mounted on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a beast of burden.’” The disciples went and did as Jesus had directed them. They brought the donkey and the colt and put on them their cloaks, and he sat on them. B. 1 The next day the large crowd that had come to the feast heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem. So they took branches of palm trees and went out to meet him, crying out, “Hosanna! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord, even the King of Israel!” And Jesus found a young donkey and sat on it, just as it is written, “Fear not, daughter of Zion; behold, your king is coming, sitting on a donkey's colt!”Not only is there a contradiction as far as who found the animal, but also how many there were! (Consider that 3 and 4).Thank you. References[1] Carson, D. A. (1994). New Bible commentary : 21st century edition (4th ed.) (Lk 3:23–38). Leicester, England; Downers Grove, Ill., USA: Inter-Varsity Press. [2] Tobin, Paul. Rejection of Pascal's Wager