BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
It's time to crackdown on cashpoint cripples.

Let us, instead, examine his anecdote dispassionately. Marie was too lazy to get up on time and was consequently running well behind schedule. Even so, her family were well into incest and she couldn't resist snogging her granny before she left. Then, between her apartment and her car she committed two crimes: 1 – Littering the street with ""Protect the Rainforest" and "Save the Dolphins" pamphlets spilling out of her backpack". 2 – Offending public decency by going out with "her dark green sweater only halfway pulled over her" thus exposing her breasts to the neighbourhood prudes. She then climbed into her classic two-door coupe – a 1975 Ford Pinto - a valuable and stylish car with a potent V6 engine (. http://classiccars.com...). However, she had failed disgracefully to maintain it properly and, as a result of her shameful neglect, the handle fell off and the engine spluttered. As it happened, though, one of her neighbours had realised that this car was a piece of American motoring history and tried to shame Marie into giving it a little bit more attention by writing "I'm poor" on it, in the same way as some people write "please clean me" on dirty vans. Subsequently, within the next eleven minutes Marie committed two further crimes: 3 – "she pulled to the right hand lane…" - driving on the wrong side of the road is incredibly dangerous and a very serious offence; vehicles in Britain must keep to the left at all times (except when overtaking). 4 – "…next to the parked cars" - double-parking is the most selfish way to park because it completely blocks the traffic. Who knows who may have been delayed by her thoughtlessness? A social worker that had just rescued a starving orphan from her abusive foster parent and was in a rush to get the poor child to hospital? Possibly? Or a couple of slimmers in an eco car who were only minutes and yards away from breaking the record for being the quickest ever obese people to drive round the world in a vehicle powered solely by human fat and whose failure to do so, as a result of Marie's selfish parking, cost charities thousands of Pounds in lost sponsorship deals? Who knows? Luckily though, a couple of public-spirited traffic wardens were on hand to resolve the matter by kneecapping Marie (who for some reason died of her injuries - perhaps she was a haemophiliac or something? ) Anyway, the traffic warden that shot her was rightly "touted as a local hero" for making an example of her and thus deterring other motorists from being equally selfish in the future. Actually, the story could have an even happier ending if Marie had been carrying an organ donor card. As a young woman, doctors could have salvaged her internal organs and used them to save several other peoples' lives. So, in view of the greater social good my proposal would have, I refute my opponent's suggestion that to f*****g spastic c***s that wilfully block the roads by blasting their f*****g kneecaps off represents a "cruel, ultra-violent and inhumane" punishment and would ask the voters to support this important measure in the fight against traffic congestion by voting Pro.
It's time to crackdown on cashpoint cripples.

I would like to share a quick little anecdote to illustrate the absolute and blatant monstrosity of what my dear opponent proposes. Marie, a senior at an excellent university, was in a hurry for her exam. After kissing her grandmother goodbye, she rushed out the door of her shoddy apartment, her "Protect the Rainforest" and "Save the Dolphins" pamphlets spilling out of her backpack (for she was a member of these charities, including others), and her dark green sweater only halfway pulled over her. As she ran, she quickly remembered that she needed to pay for the Scantron sheets in order to take her exam. Knowing there was no money in her apartment (she knew this quite well in fact, quite well), she prayed that there would be enough change in her car to cover the $2.15 fee. As she got to her 1975 Ford Pinto, she noticed someone had spray-painted "Im Poor" against the rusty, decaying exterior. Tears came to her eyes, but it was only when she attempted to open the door, and the handle broke off into her hands, did she actually begin to cry. And yet she knew she had to carry on, for if she missed the exam all her hard work would come undone. Opening the door through a previously smashed-in window, she got inside and started the car. As the engine slowly warmed, she looked desperately for any money she could, but found only bits of broken glass and some old books. After having to kick the gearstick into 1st, the car slowly began to sputter along. With only 11 minutes before her exam would begin, she quickly came to the avenue where the bank was. Noting that parking would be nearly impossible to find at this hour, not to mention would sap all her time, she pulled to the right hand lane, next to the parked cars, and ran toward the ATM. As she neared the kiosk, however, two uniformed figures walked into her path, cocked their modified shotguns loudly, aimed, and shot her in the knees. She crumpled to the floor, blood splattered everywhere, and died. Speaking of the incident later, for which he was touted as a local hero, one of the officers said: "Only the 'andicapped can do what she did...'if an able bodied person does the same, let's give them a proper excuse to do so – traffic wardens should be instructed to f*****g spastic the c***s by blasting their f*****g kneecaps off.'" Are human lives really so worthless, so devoid of any value that this measure could possibly be ok? Is simply stopping at an ATM really the infraction that deserves the most cruel, ultra-violent and inhumane death sentence of any civilized society? Didn't thinks so.
It's time to crackdown on cashpoint cripples.

First of all, a word of explanation for North American members – a "cashpoint cripple" is a cretin who parks their car illegally in order to use a nearby ATM because they are too damn lazy to walk a few yards. http://www.askoxford.com... In America, they have got drive-thru cashpoints for really lazy people, but here in Britain, there are no such things. However, we do have more than our fair share of incredibly indolent slobs who don't care if they cause a traffic jam while they get their beer vouchers out of the hole in the wall. Occasionally, they get their just reward. Yesterday, I watched as a toff in a brand new Bentley pulled up outside a bank in central London to use the cashpoint, blocking a lane of traffic as he did so. Without looking in the mirror he opened the door and a bus that was trying to squeeze past took it clean off its hinges. Oh, that really made my day, that did! Ha-ha-ha-ha! However, that sort of thing doesn't usually happen and a few days ago I was seriously delayed by a posh bird in a Porsche who completely blocked the road while she got out and queued up to use an ATM. If a traffic warden had come by (one didn't, of course) she would have got a ï¿½30 fine, but even if she had, that sort of money means nothing to the likes of her. No. There needs to be a better deterrent to these lazy, selfish drivers. Yes, it's time to tool the traffic wardens up with sawn-off shotguns. So, in future, if a disabled person parks right outside a cashpoint, that's fine, but if an able bodied person does the same, let's give them a proper excuse to do so – traffic wardens should be instructed to f*****g spastic the c***s by blasting their f*****g kneecaps off. I hereby commend this reasonable and measured proposal to the House. Thank you.
Joseph Smith is a false prophet.

"THIS generation doesn't mean, the generation that it happens. It specifically says it will occur in 1891." Can i have word for word on that??? because to my knowledge he and every other modern prophet proclaimed. "the 2nd coming will come only when god says it will" and none of them will give them ever gave a specific date" but on the other hand, Jesus could have come to earth to talk to a prophet in that time frame. STILL filling the prophecy!!! " For behold, the Southern States shall be divided against the Northern States, and the Southern States will call on other nations, even the nation of Great Britain, as it is called, and they shall also call upon other nations, in order to defend themselves against other nations; and then a war shall be poured out upon all nations." Through modern Revelation it has been CLARIFYED that it talk of even more than the civil war it talks about war from than to the 2nd coming. "That's funny... because Joseph Smith specifically said not many days hence. God must not have spoken very clearly to him." God hardly ever "the world will destroyed in 3 years 2 months 6days 5 hours 30 min 6.23556241562342462421 seconds." come on seriously not every things is immediate. I'm SORRY!!! "I agree God has a time table. Do you not take literally the things that your founding prophet says? It seems that you are easily not taking the things that he says literally." if i recall right around 95 % of the prophets of the bible even Jesus. used stories, paroles, hypothetical ideas and visions to express their vision. "would like to bring to your attention I "mingled" nothing, and put EXACTLY the quotes from Mormon approved doctrine. Never did I change anything... and gave you EXACTLY what chapter's, and pages I gathered them from. I apologize your religion is so easily proved to be false, don't blame me for that." yes you put what it said but ALL scripture has deeper meaning. and all religions have place that can be proved false BUT isn't that the concept of FAITH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "Jesus Christ said "Marriage is for Earth, not heaven"."Matt 16:19 "who so ever be bound on earth same shall be in heaven" read isaiah 29 ezekiel 37:15-28 and answers if any other church fulfilled this prophesies?
Joseph Smith is a false prophet.

<<1) Doctrines and Covenants 84:2-5,31 the "this generation" not his generation which is the generation of the last days ... our generation>> THIS generation doesn't mean, the generation that it happens. It specifically says it will occur in 1891. There's no way to side step the meaning of his "prophecy". <<2) i don't have the History of the Church on me so Ill get back to you on that!>> Unfortunately for you, I do. Not only was it NOT built in Missouri, but the temple built in Utah wasn't even built in his lifetime as he "predicted". <<3) Doctrine and Covenants 87:1-3 it's a prophecy of the civil war and IT'S repercussions on the world of freeing the slaves and us becoming the superpower we are.>> Actually, NO... is specifically says " For behold, the Southern States shall be divided against the Northern States, and the Southern States will call on other nations, even the nation of Great Britain, as it is called, and they shall also call upon other nations, in order to defend themselves against other nations; and then awar shall be poured out upon all nations." Incase anyone hadn't noticed... the civil war did not case a world war. Have you ever heard of the South calling on all Nations to help them? 4)< > That's funny... because Joseph Smith specifically said not many days hence. God must not have spoken very clearly to him. 5) I agree God has a time table. Do you not take literally the things that your founding prophet says? It seems that you are easily not taking the things that he says literally. Should I do the same, and just hope that the people telling me these things are true are indeed correct? NO, I believe we should listen to facts. I would like to bring to your attention I "mingled" nothing, and put EXACTLY the quotes from Mormon approved doctrine. Never did I change anything... and gave you EXACTLY what chapter's, and pages I gathered them from. I apologize your religion is so easily proved to be false, don't blame me for that. I notice that you said NOTHING about his "revelation" of plural marriage. Jesus Christ said "Marriage is for Earth, not heaven". How then do you think you can obtain Godhood, and rule your own planet and be equal to God through eternal marriage? Not only that, but eternal PLURAL marriage! Are you telling me that Jesus Christ is wrong? Also, are you telling me you believe Joseph Smith's proclomation that Jesus Christ is NOT god, was NOT born of a virgin, and that the Holy Trinity is not one person as the Bible says? Do you believe the Bible is 100% correct? If you do, all the Mormon proclomations could not POSSIBLY be correct.
Joseph Smith is a false prophet.

1) Doctrines and Covenants 84:2-5,31 the "this generation" not his generation which is the generation of the last days ... our generation 2) i don't have the History of the Church on me so ill get back to you on that! 3) Doctrine and Covenants 87:1-3 It's a prophecy of the civil war and IT'S repercussions on the world of freeing the slaves and us becoming the superpower we are. 4) Doctrine and Covenants 88:87 GOD's time table not yours ... i'm sorry the world does NOT revolve around YOU!!! 5) Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith, History, verse 40 Again GOD's time table. and for the "For the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord As the waters cover the sea." missionaries are every were as the "LORDS waters covering the earth" And for the rest you twisted and mingled what he said to a point if i didn't know how to "UNDERSTAND it by my self i would agree with you but your full of it. Look beyond your pathetic self and let people believe what the want to.
Joseph Smith is a false prophet.

When a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the thing does not come about or come true, that is the thing which the Lord has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him," (Deut. 18:20-22). Being a Christian, this excerpt from the bible pretty much states my case in full. Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism made MANY false prophecies. 1. Joseph Smith claimed that Jesus was to return 56 year's from the day of his prophecy. Yet, in 1891 the world was still very much not in the end of days. History of the Church, Vol. 2, p. 408-409 2. Smith claimed a great temple, and the Mecca of Mormondom to be built in Missouri in his generation. It was instead built in Utah. Doctrines and Covenants 84:2-5,31 3. Smith foretold of EVERY Nation, getting involved in the civil war. Obviously, this did not happen. Doctrine and Covenants 87:1-3 4. Joseph Smith said that "in a few days" the earth would have no sun, the moon would be bathed in blood, and the stars would fall, and the earth would shake. That was in 1832, so what exactly does a few days mean? Doctrine and Covenants 88:87 5. Smith stated that Isaiah 11 6-9 was about to come to fruition. Isaiah states:"And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, And the leopard will lie down with the kid, And the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; And a little boy will lead them. 7 Also the cow and the bear will graze; Their young will lie down together; And the lion will eat straw like the ox. 8 And the nursing child will play by the hole of the cobra, And the weaned child will put his hand on the viper's den. 9 They will not hurt or destroy in all My holy mountain, For the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord As the waters cover the sea." These things are not happening. Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith, History, verse 40 All of these quotations came from Mormon excepted doctrine. So if you are indeed a Christian, and follow the teaching of the Bible, how can you not see Joseph Smith is a false prophet? How can you excuse these so called visions from god not being true in the least? Not only will a Prophet of God not have false visions, they won't LIE about practicing them. Joseph Smith claimed to have had the "vision" of plural marriage as the only way to Godhood. This "revelation" is said to have been had by Smith in 1843 (as it says in Doctrine and Covenants, section 132.) Yet, why then did Joseph Smith ALREADY practice polygamy BEFORE this revelation? Also, why publicly in 1844 did Joseph Smith release a public statement in the Times and Seasons that a man preaching polygamy openly was being excommunicated from the church for preaching "false, and corrupt doctrine. Would a true profit of God hide a divine prophecy of God?
Death penalty

As you can see, my opponent has forfeited his last round. He also has not explained why any kind of death penalty, including the voluntary death penalty proposal I have provided, should be abolished or not exist. In fact, he completely ignored my main case for the debate of a voluntary death penalty. The topic of the debate is not the current death penalty in the United States. The topic is simply 'Death penalty' as you can see at the top of this page. Because my opponent did not specify the kind of death penalty, my opponent, under assumption, is against any kind of death penalty proposal. Yet, my opponent only argued against the current death penalty in the United States. My opponent did not make any case against my proposal of a voluntary death penalty. In fact, my opponent and I are both against the current death penalty in the United States. But my opponent did not specify that the debate revolved around the current death penalty, but any kind of death penalty. And because of this, my arguments are superior to his. Reasons for voting Pro: 1. Cost: A voluntary death penalty would be much cheaper than life in prison or even the current death penalty. My opponent has not denied this. 2. Deterrence of Crime: My opponent basically said that deterrence of crime is not why punishments are made. His argument against a death penalty is weak because basically any other form of punishment would not deter crime either. 3. International Law: My opponent argues that the current death penalty violates international law. However, the debate is not about the current death penalty, it is about any kind of penalty the invokes death. A voluntary death penalty would not only be in compliance with international law, but would give more personal liberty back to convict. My opponent did not deny this fact. 4. Risk of executing innocents: My opponent only gives a weak 10-word rebuttal to my proposal that a voluntary death penalty would make the issue of executing innocents moot. 5. Death sentences are racist and unfair: My opponent does not give any argument against my proposal that a voluntary death penalty would make the issue of racism in death penalties to also become moot. My opponent tries to refrain from the issue at hand and tries to say that the debate is about the current death penalty, which he never specified when I signed up for the debate. 6. My opponent forfeited his last round.
Dwight Schrute is a better man than Jim Halpert

I'm pretty certain that Jim's marriage to Pam only shows that he is too weak to take on the world alone. Furthermore, Jim only rose up to higher positions through kiss-assery, something only a wussy-man would do. Dwight proves time and time again that he is capable surviving as a lone wolf. Did you ever think that Dwight chose not to rise up the chain of command so that he could further enhance his farming abilities? Some of the most manly attributes a person can have is the capability to plant, grow, and harvest a crop, especially beets! And so, Dwight is the better man.
Dwight Schrute is a better man than Jim Halpert

Jim Halpert is manlier due to his ability to embrace his feelings for Pam, and do what he has to in order to overcome her engagement to Roy. He progresses up the chain of command in Dunder Mifflin faster than Dwight, probably makes more money, and also supports his family better. Not only this, but Jim also proves time and time again that he is capable of getting into Dwight's head, which is on the forefront of important abilities when it comes to head to head battling.
The officials need the voice of their people

While the government may not be hyper competent, neither are the people. You seem to fail to realize there are other forms of government rather than democratic-styled governments. People are not necessarily correct- if the government were to simply seek the guidance of the people for all of their problems, they could easily run into problems I mentioned in round 2. I'm having some slight problems responding fully to round 3 as your English seems a bit broken and you're, in my eyes, kind of going all over the place.
The officials need the voice of their people

The government is not that expert enough to know all the things in this system of life....... Thats why they need some voice just to tell them "hey dumb government help us here in this place we are dying do you have some MAGIC BEANS in order for us to survive?" There is no perfect Government............ They have their own fart to hid....... How come people are selfish....... in fact some of the cry of people in Goverment is for all of them...... They are shouting all together.. WATER CANNON? TEAR GAS? RUBBER BULLETS? STICKS? GUNS? they are resisting all of that pain in order to noticed their cry......I dont thing selfishness is present in this situation............ as you are saying we vote them to serve our nation, protect our dignity, and to calm our tidal hearts, we vote them to be our barracks in times of war.... But what is going on now......... try not to look for a while in the Government of US....... let our mind explore in Philippines,Africa etc...... Ofcourse people want the best in their lives in (poisitive ways)as you are saying inyour first paragraph. Yes there is no progress with out government,,,, but is there a government with out a PEOPLE to vote............?????? I dont think so For me a Government that knows how to look down is wise( I wish there is) thank you
The officials need the voice of their people

Well, the people are not always correct- two heads are not necessarily better than one. Your argument is an argument from popularity- you assume because people want it they want what is best. You bring up the case of the teacher in the classroom, and the parent. I believe those can be very persuasive points on my side of the argument. Imagine the classroom, whereas the teacher knows about her subject and wishes to teach it to the students. She's doing everything right, but the principle establishes democracy. Now, a bunch of (let's say, 5th graders) decide how the class is taught, if it is taught at all. In their case, they might choose to make the class about Pokemon rather than US History- or might decide to have no class at all. The child might decide to be free from the rule of his parents, and in such go out, live on his own, and perhaps be harmed. In the case of real life it is the opposite, but similar. The students and the children would be seeking freedom from the tyranny of their parents or their teachers, people seek to impose tyranny on others.People might decide to have a less free government, when more free governments are going to help everybody. People tend to wish things that will not help the majority of the people maximize liberty, people are selfish and think as if the entire government revolved around them. Both the Republican and Democratic parties are moving toward less and less freedom; the republicans supporting less and less social freedom (such as the right to marry) and the democrats are supporting less economic freedom (such as control over what happens on your property). This is allowed because people want more and more socialism, more and more authoritarianism, less and less control over their own lives- or to be more precise, more and more control over OTHER PEOPLES lives. They are selfish, they say "Hey, I should be paying a lot less for this" when they fail to realize it costs that much for a reason, or they say "I feel uncomfortable around homosexuals- let's remove their rights as much as we can!". They do not think of what would maximize the liberty of others, so much as they think of what would give themselves a greater advantage over everybody else.