Gravity Does Not Exist

I purpose to you, something most forget about: Buoyancy. This is the true factor why things fall and rise. Firstly Buoyancy is not limited to water, there is a such thing as Air Buoyancy. Such as helium rising above our normal air. Air layers, from densest to sparsest. The denser the lower. This is also the reason why when we jump we fall. We sink in air. This is also the reason Helium rises against the so called gravity. In fact its why so many gases we see everyday rise. With normal Gravity we would expect it to affect everything. This is required for the theory of Gravity. This is the reason why everything on Earth stays on Earth or so we are told. What is Weight? It is known as the pull gravity has on a object. Well if gravity effects everything then why does it effect some things more than others? These are definite problems with gravity as well as the fact everything has gravity. If this was the case then why does everything not have a slight pull towards one another? If I drop a pencil right below my table should it not be effected ever so slightly by the gravity of the table and hence forth fall slower than it would away from the table? Buoyancy solves this problem. You see the fall of an object is not determined by something like gravity but instead how dense it is. This is why everything has a set weight, we have set densities. The only time this is changed is through state change. Which weight is also changed. of course if you took all the atoms back together you would get the same weight hence no matter being lost. However just like wood floats on water, helium in a balloon floats above the air as far as it can go. Then it stops. Gravity supposedly has the strength to keep the moon in orbit, keep the oceans from being pulled off by the pull of the moon but just little enough strength keep us on the ground without pulling us into the ground. But not enough to keep smoke from rising? This is all solved through Buoyancy. The Smoke rising due to being sparser than air, but we fall due to being denser than air. Isaac came up with gravity from an apple falling, however if a smoke had risen infront of him instead we would have a completely different theory. Or how about the fact that a Hammer falls faster than a leaf? In a void supposedly the would fall at the same rate but because of air friction this interferes or so we are told. However the truth is that the hammer is denser than the leaf and hence pushed down faster by the air as the air wants to take up the higher place. The same happens with the leaf but since the leaf is less dense it is pushed down slower. In Space, there are still clusters of dust clouds that travel together but for some reason do not form into a ball like theorized for the Big Bang and how Planets formed. If that was the case then why is there any dust still floating about? Why are they not all big balls of rock? Why is the Asteroid Belt not pulling together into one big rock? Or atleast a big wall. In gravity everything pulls each other, and as it gets closer it pulls harder meaning it should be an exponential speed of the Asteriod Belt joining together. And with that its masses double, this would double its Gravitation force and affecting the whole solar system. Some may say this would take thousands of years, however Gravity is set at a current acceleration that never stops. It pulls us all the same speed when we jump supposedly. However at that rate the dust and rocks would pull together at extreme rates since when pulled by gravity without stop you will fall at around 150 miles (plus wind pressure so it would even be faster) an hour. Times that by 14 billion years (times of the universe), and you get that there should be no Asteroid Belt but instead another Giant Planet!!! The reason why the planets do not "fall" in space is due to the fact there is no buoyancy effect, just like on Earth when you put wood in water the buoyancy of Air pushing down and Water pushing up cancel out leaving zero buoyancy. The planets in space are at their true density layer, hence do not need to rise or fall. Now it would come to why is the Earth revolve around the Sun? This is where the ideas for Gravity and Buoyancy merge. The hypothetical reason why gravity increases with proximity is due to the idea of a particle called the graviton. The theory is that as two object move closer to each other the graviton density lowers hence the tow objects are pushed faster together. I say it is not a "graviton" that became less dense, but Space itself that became less dense! As the two objects got closer the "space" moved out from inbetween and around the two objects pushing them to fill the void. This increases exponentially as two objects get closer giving us the illusion of gravity. This is also why the Earth rotates around the Sun, because the distance between the two remains the same hence the pull remains the same, but the centrifugal force of the spin twist the Space causing the distance to increase while pulling at the same rate. Leading into a paradox of the Earth staying the same distance but revolving around. Same principle applies to the Moon and every other planet. This is why to this day we have not found any such graviton particle. A research group called CERN say they MIGHT have found something like a graviton however I do not believe they will find such a thing. As it would be illogical for a particle to somehow have the ability to pull everything in existence but instead it would be logical for everything in existence to have the power to move itself. How come there is no small scale examples of Gravity? You cannot take anything on earth and show it has gravity. Why don't two extremely dense objects an inch apart pull each other till they were touching, the reason this does not happen is due to Air. The Air fills the density gap of the space resulting in the objects not being pushed together. If it was gravity then every rock that has been on Earth for the millions of years Earth has been around should be a perfect sphere. Wouldn't a rock be pulling the less massful object such as air around it? Every rock on earth should be pulling air to it. Yet air resist? You see Gravity does not have a single example on Earth. But Buoyancy can be tested every day and in every way without failure. You can even use it to find the true mass of an object because it somehow adds just the right pressure to cancel out the gravitational force. However it was never gravitational force pushing down, this is the reason buoyancy can exactly cancel the outside forces because it is the same force pushing against each other. The Air is pushing the wood down while the water is pushing the wood up, This cancels perfectly and the wood moves to its perfect density layer. If buoyancy was fighting against the gravity it too would be affected by the gravity. Since Buoyancy is the movement of denser objects downward and sparser objects upwards. It is the movement of layering. So if there was always a downward force the data would be obscured. Plus if there was gravity we should feel it every day. The closer I get to an object the more it should pull me and the more I should pull it! Gravity is known as the weakest force however we can only see possible examples at the largest scale stronger than any other force. But for some reason there is nothing one Earth that can show gravity as an example. The best we get is magnetism which we can test two objects pulling together or pushing. However not everything has magnetism so that is not an option. Speaking of things not being an option. Due to the Scientific Method when something is found to go against a theory the theory must be discarded. However Gravity for some reason has not been discarded. Even though there is no evidence of Gravity on all Earth that Buoyancy cannot explain as well as the fact that some objects just dont seem to have any gravitational pull. Also until Buoyancy has been shown to have fault it will remain as truth, while Gravity is false. Sources: http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu... By definition Buoyancy is the ability or tendency to float in water or air or some other fluid. Combine this with the fact dense objects go below less dense objects and everything fits. I am also expanding the idea of Buoyancy to also encompass the vacuum of Space. It may sound like a crazy idea however so would gravity when it first came out. The idea every object is bending space time (Again just another theory of gravity, honestly gravity has very little facts about it.) is crazy. https://en.wikipedia.org... Buoyancy is proven everyday of every second. Smoke rises, Rain falls from the clouds when they densify, solids sink, ect... Buoyancy is fact, Gravity is theory (A flawed one.) https://en.wikipedia.org... http://examples.yourdictionary.com... Everything on this site about gravity is better and more clearly explained by Buoyancy and Density. http://idahoptv.org... Everything on this site is also better explained by Buoyancy and Density. http://www.universetoday.com... Here everything can also be explained by yet again. Buoyancy and Density. They even say and I quote: "So, what is gravity and where does it come from? To be honest, we"re not entirely sure." This whole article was posted by the NASA AMBASSADOR So it is for sure credible information. However I can explain what has been so unsure for so long with Buoyancy and Density! My info (disregarding the Wiki pedi, but what i got from there should be basic info, like what Buoyancy is and how it works from what we have studied.) is all from credible sources. I turn the debate over to Con, and hope the best. Can you show me that the theory of Gravity is more probable than the fact of Buoyancy?