Logic proves the existence of God

Let me begin by defining logic. Dictionary.com logic[loj-ik]noun1.the science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference.2.a particular method of reasoning or argumentation: We were unable to follow his logic.3.the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study.4.reason or sound judgment, as in utterances or actions: There wasn't much logic in her move.5.convincing forcefulness; inexorable truth or persuasiveness: the irresistible logic of the facts. This is fine, as far as it goes, but does not tell us what logic is. Thefreedictionary.com provides more information. log·ic (l!5;j′ĭk) n. 1. The study of the principles of reasoning, especially of the structure of propositions as distinguished from their content and of method and validity in deductive reasoning. 2. a. A system of reasoning: Aristotle's logic. b. A mode of reasoning: By that logic, we should sell the company tomorrow. c. The formal, guiding principles of a discipline, school, or science. 3. Valid reasoning: Your paper lacks the logic to prove your thesis. 4. The relationship between elements and between an element and the whole in a set of objects, individuals, principles, or events: There's a certain logic to the motion of rush-hour traffic. 5. Computer Science a. The nonarithmetic operations performed by a computer, such as sorting, comparing, and matching, that involve yes-no decisions. b. Computer circuitry. c. Graphic representation of computer circuitry. [Middle English, from Old French logique, from Latin logica, from Greek logikē (tekhnē), (art) of reasoning, logic, feminine of logikos, of reasoning, from logos, reason; see leg- in Indo-European roots.]logic (G2;l;4;dA8;=8;k) n 1. (Logic) the branch of philosophy concerned with analysing the patterns of reasoning by which a conclusion is properly drawn from a set of premises, without reference to meaning or context. See also formal logic, deduction4, induction4 2. (Logic) any particular formal system in which are defined axioms and rules of inference. Compare formal system, formal language 3. the system and principles of reasoning used in a specific field of study 4. a particular method of argument or reasoning 5. force or effectiveness in argument or dispute 6. reasoned thought or argument, as distinguished from irrationality 7. the relationship and interdependence of a series of events, facts, etc 8. (Logic) chop logic to use excessively subtle or involved logic or argument 9. (Computer Science) electronics computing a. the principles underlying the units in a computer system that perform arithmetical and logical operations. See also logic circuit b. (as modifier): a logic element. [C14: from Old French logique from Medieval Latin logica (neuter plural, treated in Medieval Latin as feminine singular), from Greek logikos concerning speech or reasoning]log•ic (G2;l;4;dA8; =8;k) n. 1. the science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference. 2. symbolic logic. 3. a particular method of reasoning or argumentation. 4. the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study. 5. reason or sound judgment, as in utterances or actions. 6. the consistency to be discerned in a work of art, system, etc. 7. any connection between facts that seems reasonable or inevitable. 8. a. the arrangement of circuitry in a computer. b. a circuit or circuits designed to perform functions defined in terms of mathematical logic. [1325–75; Middle English logik < Latin logica, n. use of neuter pl. of Greek logikós of speech or reason. See logos, -ic] log′ic•less, adj.logic (l!5;j′ĭk) The study of the principles of reasoning, especially of the structure of propositions as distinguished from their content and of method and validity in deductive reasoning.Wow! Who knew? Correct me, if I'm wrong, but I don't think there is anything that cannot be described by logic. Here are some of my observations of logic.1) Logic is absolute2) Logic is unchanging.3) Logic is immaterial4) Logic is universalThere are also many branches of logic. There is formal logic, modal logic, mathematical logic, meta logic and even fuzzy logic. Each serves a different purpose, since no single branch of logic applies to everything.Back to my observations. Logic is absolute. This means that if one applies the laws of logic to an argument, using the same data every time, they will always get the same results. It works, regardless of who uses them. The laws of logic are absolute.Logic is unchanging. The laws of logic apply, no matter where or when they are used. There are no circumstances in which this is not true. Logic is immaterial. Logic is not a construct of the physical universe. It is not tied to matter, energy or motion. It exists independently of our physical universe.Logic is universal. This one should be self explanatory. The same logic we use, on good old planet Earth, will work wherever it's used.Logic actually has the same attributes as God, as stated in the Bible. He is all powerful, or absolute. I believe the two are synonymous.He is unchanging.He is immaterial.He is universal.(1) How do atheists account for the laws of logic in a universe without God? The Laws of logic are conceptual by nature and absolute. Being absolute they transcend space and time. They are not of the properties of the physical universe (since they are conceptual) or of people (since people contradict each other, which would mean they weren't absolute). So, how do they account for them? Examples of logical absolutes are: something cannot be itself and not itself at the same time (Law of non contradiction). A thing is what it is (Law of identity). A statement is either true or false (Law of excluded middle). These are simple, logical absolutes. How can absolute, conceptual, abstract laws be derived from a universe of matter, energy and motion? In other words, how can an atheist with a naturalistic presupposition account for the existence of logical absolutes when logical absolutes are conceptual by nature and not physical, energy, or motion? (1) http://www.4forums.com...Thank you for reading. Hopefully, I've given you something to think about. I now turn it over to my opponent.