Christians who accept evolution are in error! According to the bible alone!

1.Well I will address my opponents false statement about Adam was not literal, or did he say allegory? Please clarify what was literal, and when, and at what point, did the bloodline of Adam stop being a metaphor? When, at what point did a actual, factual, real detailed "live birth" record umbilical (flesh) cord to umbilical (flesh) cord. That leads from Adam to Noah to Abraham to Virgin Mary to Jesus Christ. My opponent's religion ignores the 300+ prophecies concerning Jesus. He had to be a first born of a pure daughter of a direct descendant of Eve. My opponent said The first Adam was not God in flesh just as Jesus was is God in flesh. Yet the entire world wants the world to be restored to the time of Eden. Duh? Who was in charge of Eden? Adam.My opponent denies any part of the bible that exposes his false religion. My opponent claims that St.Luke and St.John are liars! Luk_3:38, Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God. Rev_5:5, And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. Rev_22:16, I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. My opponent said Adam is not relevant? I ask my opponnet is he an expert in what parts of God Word,is relevant, or which part, to throw out, change or ignore?My opponent quoted : " To clarify again, I never said that David did not exist. Also, viewing one biblical character as metaphorical does not necessisitate viewing other characters as such.") So I ask my opponent how did his religion decide which is metaphorical? Please explain how a metaphore BEGAT King David that really existed? Anyone trusting a person Protestant religious teaching is not a wise person. Did God's Word change? Or did the god of your Prostant faith change? Is your god two-faced or does he straight up just lie? Mat_5:18, For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Mal_3:6, For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. Mal_3:7, Even from the days of your fathers ye are gone away from mine ordinances, and have not kept them. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the LORD of hosts. But ye said, Wherein shall we return?I refute my opponent's assertion that Passover being changed to East'ar (A PAGAN RITUAL) is not relevalent to this debate. Example: If a lawyer catches a witness on the stand lying, the evidence is not creditable. And and be thrown out by the judge, and the judge may order the jury to vote ignoring that witness who lied.This debate is about evolution and the bible, and the errors of Christians who carry a bible yet choose to babble on in ignorance! My opponent claims to serve the Prostestant god, and not a Pope! I ask my opponent does he understand who Martin Luther was? And the fact that the early Protestant Church fathers wore caps! I can inform my opponent that Protestant fatih came right out of the Catholic religion.My opponent posted: "Actually, I'm Protestant, so no, I don't "trust a papal cap wearing Pope." But, like so many of my opponent's points, whether I am Catholic or Protestant is irrelevant to this debate."I ask my opponent to explain what is that item on Martin Luther's head? Was he not a priest?https://www.google.com... He even wore a hat when he left his papal duties! Now I assert that my opponent's witness is not true or creditable, and he seems to make up (Lie?) as he goes? For the record I am not intersted his which branch out of the 1000's of different types/demonations/franchises of Christian religions who carry bibles, to give the pretene that they are bible based, however my opponent just proved, that Protestants only babble like the rest!For the record: nor did I ask which religious franchise he is a member of! I boldly stated that according to the bible Christ is, was, always will be Lord of the Sabbath! Christians are in error!!!! That is what the debate is about! Lev_16:31, It shall be a sabbath of rest unto you, and ye shall afflict your souls, by a statute for ever. Lev_19:3, Ye shall fear every man his mother, and his father, and keep my sabbaths: I am the LORD your God. Lev_19:30, Ye shall keep my sabbaths, and reverence my sanctuary: I am the LORD. Lev_23:3, Six days shall work be done: but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, an holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of the LORD in all your dwellings. Lev_23:11, And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD, to be accepted for you: on the morrow after the sabbath the priest shall wave it. Lev_23:15, And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Lev_23:16, Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the LORD. Lev_23:24, Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, In the seventh month, in the first day of the month, shall ye have a sabbath, a memorial of blowing of trumpets, an holy convocation. Lev_23:32, It shall be unto you a sabbath of rest, and ye shall afflict your souls: in the ninth day of the month at even, from even unto even, shall ye celebrate your sabbath. Lev_23:38, Beside the sabbaths of the LORD, and beside your gifts, and beside all your vows, and beside all your freewill offerings, which ye give unto the LORD. Lev_23:39, Also in the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when ye have gathered in the fruit of the land, ye shall keep a feast unto the LORD seven days: on the first day shall be a sabbath, and on the eighth day shall be a sabbath. Lev_24:8, Every sabbath he shall set it in order before the LORD continually, being taken from the children of Israel by an everlasting covenant. In regards to Mary in your closing statement please educate (LOL) me which one of the flesh (BEGETEN/SPERM/BY SEX!!!!!!!!!!!) men in Virgin Mary's, Adam's, David's (OR CAIN'S WHO KILLED ABLE!!!!) birth record was also a myth, allegory, parable, metaphore or figure of speech. Next I must close with asking which body part (Not the brain for sure!) did my opponent pull Theistic Evolution out of?????????Did Darwin the Atheist repent, and get saved and was called by God to teach the gospel by teaching Protestant Christians that men evolved from maggots to monkeys? Making the Creator God a liar who claimed to have created KIND AFTER KIND!!! So why God need Noah? At what point/on what day in Genesis in Theistic Evolution did maggots turn to men? Educate us all! Thank you for this debate!