Resolved: Freezing time would destroy many aspects of the world

Pleasure to be debating with someone as experienced as you.My mistake. I'm still new here. My definition isn't too far out.I will define the terms now. I am talking real-world, not Futurama. Also, in the last episode of Futurama, they did not freeze time, but rather send someone ten seconds into the past [1].Aspect: a particular part or feature of something [5].Something: Human, place (Earth.) Examples of aspects we will be using in this debate:*Environment*Human life*Heat*WaterIn this debate, freezing time would relate to what they did do in Futurama. A single man freezes time somehow with an electronic button, as what Fry used in Futurama. This is the only example we will be using since I don't want to veer too far off of the Futurama episode. This means YOU ARE THE ONLY THING NOT FROZEN (in time). Since the ten seconds in the Futurama episode is the baseline you set for this debate, I will talk about that first.Ten second time freeze:As we all know, everything in your body takes time to do. Your brain takes time to process information and send signals to the body parts. That means the brain could not send any signals to the body to pump blood or to breathe oxygen. When time would literally freeze, people's brain cells would become damaged, like a stroke [2]. The only difference here is that people's brain cells become completely devoid of oxygen. This kills off many of the brain cells, thus destroying needed intelligence. And since all 7,132,000 people in the world [3] except you would experience a stroke-like thing at the same time, it would be disastrous. 140k/795k stoke victims die [4]. That is about 17.6% mortality rate. So now, we multiply the world's population by .176 to see how many would approximately be killed off. This is about 1,218,000,000 people dead from you freezing time. Also, those are only the people who would die. What about the ones who would get lasting brain damage due to the fact that their brain cells don't receive oxygen for ten seconds? The world would be ruined.The Earth and Heat:The second problem about freezing time is that heat from the sun would be unable to reach the Earth since it takes 8.3 minutes [6] for the sun's heat to reach the Earth. Everything including you, others, water and any object would freeze. Also, the electronic device you used for freezing time would freeze itself, making it impossible to unfreeze time even if you yourself don't freeze from the cold.Never be able to UNFREEZE time:The button used to freeze time is electronic, as I stated. But all electronic things require TIME to proccess. Electronic things send out pulses [7] telling it what to do. But those pulses, like anything, need time to reach its destination. And since the watch itself would also be frozen, there is no way you could ever unfreeze time. So once you die from the cold or anything else, life is over as we know it, which is the biggest consequence.These are only a few things that could happen. I eagerly await your response.[1] http://io9.com...[2] http://www.ninds.nih.gov...[3] http://www.worldometers.info...[4] http://www.strokecenter.org...[5] https://www.google.com...[6] http://wiki.answers.com...[7] http://www.howelectronicswork.ca...