There is mathematical Proof of the Existence of God

CON 1)That's not mathematical proof. You simply created a 3D model and labelled it with numbers randomly. There is no evidence for any of this stuff that you are asserting, such as how you "reverse engineered" a false Jerusalem that doesn't exist. RESP: First, the numbers are not randomly placed on the Dimensional Plot Chart. The Dimensional Plot Chart was built based on a 24 step process, outlined in the Amen Code. You still refuse to read the proof which enables the creation of the "3D model", thus your statement is simply opinion. You stated previously, "In a debate, you provide evidence, and cite sources to back it up. Your source can be this book, as long as you can provide a link to it and cite a page number," I have provided you with the page numbers, the link to the sources, and the resulting data that was created by it. If you do not view the sources, how do you know what I have cited is a factual source, and accurately representative of the source statement, evidence, and conclusions; or if it was taken out of context. (If you respond without reading the source documents, your statements can not be trusted, because you are not informed, nor can you verify if the source is "good") CON 2)You have not provided any math or logic, or even attempted to explain what a "numerical New Jerusalem" is. RESP: As stated previously, the evidence is 200 plus pages of logic. The initial statement was, "There is Mathematical Proof of God." A 3D model, charts, and sources were provided that my opponent refuses to review for his personal edification nor reviews to validate or disprove my claim. Further, my initial claim was that one would have to review the evidence in the Amen Code, or they would find it difficult to believe the statements that follow: "The numerical New Jerusalem, in scientific terms is a Dimensional Plot Chart that makes use of Einstein's Unified Field Theory (string theory); with each unified field cell representative of a number. Construction of the Dimensional Plot Chart is based on Jesus' Gnostic Teachings and the codes within the Gnostic Scriptures. "The alpha to numeric conversion of the names of the twelve tribes of Israel and Jesus' twelve Apostles are used to confirm the numbers on the walls and gates of numerical New Jerusalem, as detailed in Revelation 21:12-14. "The names for the twelve tribes of Israel and the twelve Apostles are converted with use of a new alpha to numeric conversion system similar to the Hebrew gematria system. This new system makes use of the decipherment key of Revelation 13:11-18, the name and number of name of the 666 Beast. "Reverse engineering of the process used to construct New Jerusalem's Dimensional Plot Chart reveals the Heavens and the Realms of Hades and is confirmed by Jesus' scared Gnostic teachings. "After the evidence is provided and mathematically confirmed, the biblical codes that reveal the plan for global economic and social security are decoded and confirmed. "Then, Plan 360 " Global Economic and Social Security, is outlined based on the divine plan My opponent did not review the Amen Code, and per my initial claim, does not believe the evidence within the Amen Code. Thus, my initial claim is correct. Because people do not read the Bible nor the Gnostic Scriptures for themselves, and rely upon a preacher or pastor to tell them what is in the documents, and rely on someone else to interpret the scriptures for them (as my opponent wished me to do for him) misinformation regarding the true message within the scriptures abounds. God intended us to read the words within the Bible for ourselves, and to reflect on the message within it. In other words, God expects us to think: "When you see "the abomination that causes desolation" standing where it does not belong"let the reader understand"then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. Mark 13:14 (NIV) Knowledge is required to learn the truth about God. One obtains knowledge not just from watching documentaries and television, but by reading and analyzing. ""Whoever, then, knows the Father in pure knowledge will depart to the Father and repose in Unbegotten Father. But whoever knows him defectively will depart to the defect and the rest of the Eighth. Now whoever knows Immortal Spirit of Light in silence, through reflecting and consent in the truth, let him bring me signs of the Invisible One, and he will become a light in the Spirit of Silence. Whoever knows Son of Man in knowledge and love, let him bring me a sign of Son of Man, that he might depart to the dwelling-places with those in the Eighth" The Sophia of Jesus Christ -- Paragraph 46 Gnostic Codex of The Nag Hammadi Library If you do not read things for yourself you are reliant on another"s interpretation of what things mean. And can be lead astray. Unlike my opponent, I hope you will read the evidence for yourself, and make your own decision about what the evidence states. I will be available should you have any questions regarding the evidence within the Amen Code, and will appreciate you detailing an error should you find one. You can email or friend me. My opponent has not refuted my initial claims, he refused to read the evidence, which results in his disbelief. The complexity of the information and the knowledge required to provide the evidence, is not suited for a debate here. And requires one that is willing to debate the subjects within the book, evidence set by evidence set. To debate the proof here, under the conditions my opponent wished to set, does not yield truth nor enables discovery. Debates are for show and entertainment, books get into the fine details. And, allows one to review all evidence so one can make an informed decision about what is truth, fiction or factual. As stated previously, in my initial claim: The story is true. The evidence is real. ... Review the Evidence then vote (free ebook, format: pdf document). Manuscript: http://1drv.ms... (Microsoft One Drive Virus and Ad Free) The link to the free ebook will be live for the duration of the voting period, so you can examine the evidence for yourself. Finally: My opponent may state that I have provided no evidence, but indeed I have. Those who do not read the Bible nor the Gnostic Codes can not possibly understand nor believe what Jesus states. My opponent was given sources with page numbers which he did not review. My opponent wished me to minimize the proof, which would have resulted in inaccurate information and understanding; and invalidate my claims. In my opening claim I stated, "until you review the evidence within the Amen Code, you as well as many others, may find it difficult to believe the statements that follow:" The statements that followed are not believed by my opponent because he did not read the book " My opponent did not read the book, as a result does not believe I rest my case. I look forward to a civil debate with someone that has read the evidence.