It is beyond a reasonable doubt that flight 77 hit the Pentagon

A) I cited the unanimity of agreement of the 13 eyewitnesses only to establish the certitude of the north side approach of the plane. The fact that some of these eyewitnesses (Robert Turcios, Terry Morin, Bill Legasse) were certain that the plane hit the Pentagon even though they could not have seen the "area of impact" from their vantage point leads me to believe a factor I have strongly suspected influenced them as well as others, that of their expectation determining their perception. It would have been a near impossibility for anyone on the west side of the Pentagon to have actually seen the plane fly over the building since it would have been hidden by the fireball which almost instantly expanded to well above the top of the wall. The strongest evidence that the plane did fly over the building is the eyewitness account of Pentagon police officer Roosevelt Roberts,Jr. who described seeing a "large aircraft liner" with jet engines and "silver in color" fly over the Pentagon south parking area almost as low as the light poles. He describes seeing the plane only a few seconds after hearing a large explosion that shook the building. Since no witnesses report seeing a second plane approaching the Pentagon from any direction immediately prior to the explosion, the plane seen by Roberts flying away had to be the same one seen flying toward the building by numerous witnesses. Officer Roberts gave his account in a recorded interview for the Library of Congress on November 30, 2001. http://vimeo.com... http://csarnsblog.blogspot.com... B) Explaining the apparent white smoke on the video released by the Pentagon as a "light pole induced fuel dump" is utterly unconvincing. An aircraft fuel dump is a deliberate precautionary action taken by the pilot to release excess fuel, usually before landing under hazardous conditions that could result in an onboard fire. It is not caused by bird strikes or other objects ingested into the engine. http://wikipedia.org... C) Photographs of the damage to the Pentagon prior to the collapse of the roof reveal numerous conditions inconsistent with an impact by a Boeing 757. That there would have been any columns, regardless of the direction they were leaning, still intact and standing where the right engine would have entered the building is absolutely incongruous. The photographs taken of the damaged area by FEMA a few days afterward show the concrete floor slab that extends out to and slightly in front of the outer wall virtually undamaged. This is where the engines, the lowest structures on a 757 jetliner in flight, would have hit and plowed across the surface. Claiming the engines would have been "torn to pieces" when they hit the outer wall is simply wrong. The engines are by far the strongest components of a jet airliner. Most of the major constituents are steel. If an aluminum aircraft body could have penetrated the outer wall, a steel engine could have done so while incurring less damage. The lack of evidence of damage to the floor slab from the huge steel engines is an extreme anomaly. http://vimeo.com... D) In 2007 Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained the raw Flight Data Recorder file from the NTSB through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. They were later told by NTSB that the file had been provided by mistake and it should not have been sent to them. However, the raw data file was useless to them without the software to decode it. It was through a fortuitous contact within the aircraft data industry that they managed to get the file decoded. Whether it was carelessness by NTSB or someone who wanted to leak sensitive information or for whatever reason, the flight data file got out of the government's control. The data in it have been found to be at variance with the official account of AA77's flight path and neither the NTSB nor the FBI will comment on it. http://pilotsfor911truth.org...