Instead of letting transgender students use what ever sports team or bathroom they want we should...

...rename the sports teams and bathrooms with labels that only apply to one's "physical form" and do not refer to one's "gender identity" Rules: 1. All I have to do is prove that this way of segregating sports teams and bathrooms is better than doing it based on "gender" (as defined in this debate based upon gender identity rather than "physical form") 2. The debate assumes the educational sessions I will describe below* will take place. 3. Con will argue that basing segregation on "gender" (as in gender identity) is better than segregation on "physical form". Con must also be arguing from the position that we should let transgender students use which ever sports team or bathroom that they want. What labels to use to refer to physical form? Doesn't really matter. We could make new ones out of thin air if we wanted to. For the purposes of this debate I'll just use these terms: "Physical Form" referring to either of the two terms I'm about to introduce below. "Kronkers" referring to anyone who has the physical body typically associated with being male. And "Nonkers" referring to anyone who has the physical body typically associated with being female. *And as part of the children's education they will be introduced to the reality that sometimes Kronkers are girls, and other times boys and sometimes Nonkers are boys, and other times girls. They will also be taught that sometimes people's bodies fall between the two types to an extent but that generally they are closer to one or the other. Under circumstances where someone is completely intersexed, not strictly Kronker or Nonker then we can give that child a choice about which sports team or bathroom to use. It is my contention that this is a much more logical way of segregating bathrooms and sports teams than to do it based on gender. On Sports Teams: One's gender does not determine one's physical capabilities. One's physical form does. Kronkers are proven to be more physically strong than Nonkers which is why we don't just have coed sports teams. It isn't fair to let a Kronker even if that Kronker is a girl on to the Nonkers' team. This is not to say that transgender students shouldn't get to play sports just that they should play on the team of their physical form. This is more important for keeping Kronkers off of the Nonkers team. If a Nonker whether the Nonker is a boy or a girl proves good enough to make it on the Kronkers team there is no real issue of fairness and so it is in my opinion that then that should be allowed, although that falls outside the scoop of the debate. All I must prove is that it's better to segregate sports teams on physical form than it is to do so based on gender, the question of whether to allow Nonkers on the Kronkers team being outside the scope of this debate. On Bathrooms: Nonkers don't want to see penises or testicles in their bathroom and we are putting Nonker boys at risk of teasing or worse if we let them in the same bathroom with Kronker boys and they see their vaginas. It makes a great deal more sense to just relabel all the bathrooms "Nonker's Room" and "Kronker's Room" and base the room you use the bathroom on your "physical form" rather than your "gender". In doing so there is no discrimination against transgender students because we're making it clear that the segregation isn't based upon one's gender, it's based on one's physical form so by requiring them to go to the sports team or bathroom that is more appropriate for their physical form we are not making any pronouncements on what the child's gender should be. Since children will be educated that just because someone has a "Kronker" physical form doesn't automatically mean they are a boy and just because someone has a "Nonker" physical form doesn't automatically mean they are a girl this policy will make it crystal clear that the segregations based on physical form are not a rejection of transgender children's gender identities and with the educational policy put into place we will be guaranteeing that all children are educated on the validity of transgender identity.