it is possible that god exists

before I start I will say something, since I was not able to change the resolution in time my opponent now must argue that in no possiblity in no way does god exist. He has to prove that all proof leads to the denial of god, which he has not done. "Physicists think that even time began with the big bang. Today, just about every scientist believes in the big bang model. The evidence is overwhelming enough that in 1951, the Catholic Church officially pronounced the big bang model to be in accordance with the Bible. I repeat in accordance with the bible!!!"I am a catholic and said above I agree with the big bang, but you still didn't answer how did it start. Also since you haven't answered it I will answer it for you, god made the big bang making time. This answers your question also about who made god because if time doesn't exist and other dimensions exist then no one had to make god. You just helped my point. Further more if the church said it goes with the bible then it can be related to god. " The big bang theory is the theory that the universe started from a single point, and has been expanding ever since."agreed but still :1, what started it.2. how did it start from nothing without godly intervention.3. Is there proof that god did not do it?My answers: it is logical that some intelectual being/force started the big bangIt needed godly intenvention to start (my theory god ate beans and grabed a lighter, just kidding obviously)and there is no proof a god didn't do it, therefore you can say it is possible he/she did it. so well yeah thats it. "" then that ceases to be an astronomical question, but a religious one."False scientists are still puzzled on how it started. So since they have no definate conclusion anything could be the answer. Since anything (well anything relavant) can be the answer then god might be one, therefore it is possible he exists. You have not proved that god doesn't exist. You need to prove his existance is immpossible, which you have not don. My side of the BOP is done, yours not so much. his religeous and astronomy argument 2nd partwell so cool a few astronomers agree with me, but still is it not possible god exists? Yes there is a posibility and all I had to prove was that and I have done it, you have not even come close to saying it is impossible. Ok, well you haven't proved your case, so to make it hard I will state my arguments one more time, proving that it is possible that he exists. C1: KALAM COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. I will show you it's basic consept again: Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence.The universe began to exist.Therefore, the universe has a cause of its existence.Since no scientific explanation (in terms of physical laws) can provide a causal account of the origin of the universe, the cause must be personal (explanation is given in terms of a personal agent) [1]So that is a logical argument. SO that is enough explanation.C2: teneology1. If teleology exists, then an ordering intellect exists.2. Teleology exists.3. Therefore, an ordering intellect exists.This is also self explanatory. Plato (c. 427–c. 347 B.C.) posited a "demiurge" of supreme wisdom and intelligence as the creator of the cosmos in his work Timaeus. Plato's teleological perspective is also built upon the analysis of a priori order and structure in the world that he had already presented in The Republic. Plato does not propose creation ex nihilo; rather, the demiurge made order from the chaos of the cosmos, imitating the eternal Forms. [2]C3: laws of logicI cannot be w and w at once.something cannot make itselfSo I cannot make myself, someone else has to. These arguments are from my 5th source.The laws of logic are absolute.The laws of logic are absolute even in another diminsion or universe. [5]The laws of logic do not rely on people as they are absolute, wether or not we exist.They are not related to physical propertiesmy 5th source is where this is from. [3] http://plato.stanford.edu...;[1] Brickhouse, Thomas; Smith, Nicholas D. (April 21, 2005)."Plato". Internet Encycopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved November 12, 2011. [2]https://school.carm.org...;[3]