BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Kolte Patil 24K Grazio in Koramangala

Did you find best property of Kolte Patil 24K Grazio in Koramangala, banglore. And you want purchase your own property as a like: 2 BHK, 3 BHK, 4 BHK flats etc. Because Your dream more powerful and beautiful. Relax, for this you can contact best property dealer available in Koramangala at 8147203771 easily. He will provide you right advice for purchasing flats. So, contact today and tell us your requirements. More Details @ http://www.24kgraziokoltepatil.com...
i can prove that you are in the illuminati

Pikapoleon Pikapoleon has 10 letters in it 10 has 2 numbers in it 10 - 2 = 8 eight eight rhymes with weight weight is gained by eating food food food has 4 letters in it 4 rhymes with more more has 2 vowels in it 2 2 rhymes with you you you can be made into your by adding 1 letter that letter is r r rhymes with car cars can drive guess who can drive cars me me rhymes with mediterranean sea mediterranean has 13 letters in it thirteen rhymes with green bean green beans have pods in them pods pods rhyme with tide pods tide pods came out in 1946 1946 has the number 6 in it six six has 3 letters in it 6 - 3 = 3 there are 3 sides on the illuminati so Pikapoleon is illuminati confirmed (this was meant to be a joke lol)
Singing for fun

Well done for that great rendition of "Great is Thy Faithfulness."This next song is based on the mostly true story about a famous auctioneer named Ray Sims. According to Leroy Van Dyke, who wrote the song, the only part of the song that isn't true was that Ray Sims was from Arkansas. In reality, it was from Missouri, but Van Dyke couldn't find a word that rhymed with Missouri, so he made him from Arkansas.This is a hard song to sing, and it took a lot of practice. There are a few mistakes, but this is a first take, so cut me some slack!http://www.youtube.com...
Singing for fun

I challenge thee to a singing duel! We each must sing three songs, one song per round. Round 1 is for acceptance, parameters, and well-wishes. The rest of the rounds are for posting videos of us singing. Instrumentation is allowed as long as it doesn't drown out your voice, but no dubbing over your own voice, no multi-tracking, and no cloning yourself.Voters: Since songs require artistic license, no points should be given or taken for spelling and grammar. Really, the only points that should be given or taken is argument points. Or, if one of us forfeits a round, you can reflect your dissatisfaction with the "conduct" point option.May the odds be ever in your favor! But may they mostly be in mine. :-)
Walmart or fedex should run our government

Walmart has a little over 2 million employees*. 1.6 of them are suing Walmart AS WE SPEAK. You ask that we put these people in charge of our government? And this is just a run of the mill class-action lawsuit! Oh no sir! This is the biggest lawsuit in the history of the U.S**. It is estimated that the suit could cost WalMart billions. And you sit there and INSIST that we put these people, this corporation in charge?! And with No evidence or reasons as why? No arguments. If WalMart were to run the government, they would also run the courts. SO tell me, my good sir, how then would these 1.6 million women GET THE JUSTICE THEY DESERVE?! You have no answer.....for there is no answer. You have yet to present to me a single solid argument towards your point and also a single shred of evidence, that you have any idea of what you're talking about. I await your reply. Good night and GOOD LUCK *http://www.quora.com... **http://www.katv.com...
Walmart or fedex should run our government

To answer some of your points, running a successful Corporation is very different from running a country. It's not even in the same ballpark. The main thing you have to worry about in running a company is finances and PR(public relations), whereas in a country like America you have to worry about Finances, PR, international affairs, Health Care, I could go on and on. Also no, throwing more people in jail WILL NOT fix out financial problems Looking forward to your arguments. Thank you.
Walmart or fedex should run our government

The government is very inefficient. If the money is not spent by the next fiscal year end the unit "if let's say the military" will get less money next year so they just spend it all so they are rewarded for waste. I am experienced in how some parts of government run. This is why I don't understand why government does not seem to want to become more efficient. Companies are run to create a profit so they cut out the cancerous inefficient parts and reward productivity why can't we create a productive government. This is just a thought don't you wonder why there are more cops out giving tickets when the city is losing money jails and tickets are revenue so lock up more people make more money?
We should allow the g4 states into the UN Security council

I will individually explain why each country should be on the UN security council. I will only be arguing that Brazil, India, and Japan should be allowed a permanent seats since me and my opponent seem to both agree on Germany. My arguments will often be about nuclear weapons and I may often refer to the nuclear non proliferation treaty(NPT). Now I'm not saying that only security council nations can be apart of this, but it's kind of a unofficial rule and will likely remain this way. Let me begin. .. -Japan 1. Economy- Japan has the 3rd largest nominal GDP and is the second largest contributor to the UN budget, contributing 19.5% of the UN budget. Each Japanese citizen is contributing 3.94$ to the UN. Japans contributing more then France,Russia,United Kingdom,and China combined! This shows extreme dedication! Japans soaring economy is just one reason it should be considered a world power! . http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com... . http://bravotech.net... . http://data.worldbank.org... 2. HDI-The HDI is a number created by comparing a countries average education,life expectancy,quality of life,etc. Japan has the 10th largest HDI in the world. They have proved that something about there current system is working and that should seriously be considered. . http://hdr.undp.org... 3. Government- Japan is a shining example of a working government with little corruption surrounded by nations that have experienced many military coups, acts of terrorism, and ethnic wars. Japans government should at least be taken into notice in it's battle for a council seat. -India 1. Military power- India's Military is the is the 3rd largest on earth, consisting of 1.3 million actively serving personnel. India's military is also advancing fast in terms of new technology. They also has one of the largest navies for a nation. India also has about 9000 UN peacekeepers making it the 3rd largest contributor. India already has nuclear weapons, making it one of 9 countries to possess them. It would not surprise me if India got a permanent seat on military strength alone. . http://www.un.org... . http://www.nationmaster.com... 2. Representation-India represents it's fair share of Muslims,Hindus,Buddhists, and other religions. None of these groups are currently represented in the UN and many believe it's important that they are. . http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com... -Brazil 1. Economy- Brazil has been a major player in the global market recently. It has also fought it's way up to having the 7th largest nominal GDP (Guinness World Records says 6th for 2014). Brazil is neck and neck with France for 5th largest. Brazil is most certainly a economic super power. . http://data.worldbank.org... 2. Military- Brazil has a huge military for a South American country and has a even more impressive navy. The search for a South American nation able to resolve disputes and maintain peace in Latin America is over! . http://www.nationmaster.com...As I said earlier, Germany is not on here due to us both agreeing on Germany. Hopefully my rebuttals won't be as long.
We should allow the g4 states into the UN Security council

The G4 nations consist of Japan,Brazil,India, and Germany who are all trying to become members within the UN security council. It is intensely debated whether they should be allowed in. I will take the side that they should be allowed in. This is my first debate so please show a little mercy. 1. Acceptance. 2. Reasoning. 3. Rebuttals. 4. Closing Arguments (brief)
Gay Marriage and Gay Rights

As I've stated before, men and women are equal in every aspect of the word. If a woman loves a man she gets to marry him and the other way around, but some believe that a man marrying another man is so awful based on the fact that its wrong. So I guess I get to ask the question: What's wrong? How a man or a woman feels about a person of the same sex? If you asked a person about love and they gave an answer about how it feels, notice how they didn't put any gender roles on it. They most likely will use genderless pronouns such as they or it. So why is it so hard for people to understand that gays just want the same thing that heterosexual people do? They just want to be able to spend the rest of their life with the person that they love.
Freedom will be a luxury in the future. Discuss in relation to 1984 & North Korea.

I didn't want you to miss out! Haha In accordance with George Orwell's 1984 and the world's current totalitarian state, North Korea, freedom will indeed be a luxury. Freedom to act on one's will, freedom of expression and freedom to privacy is destroyed in both totalitarian regimes; given that they both conduct mass surveillance, propaganda and develop cult of personalities in order to restrict these factors that constitute freedom. How does my opponent construct a rebuttal to suggest otherwise that freedom will not be a luxury in relation to the above ideas?
Taking things too seriously is bad, yo.

My opponent argues that seriousness sis inherently benign in nature. I argue that too much of benevolence is inherently malign as it is too much. Too much of anything is a bad thing as it is over what the maximum should be. Disregarding that argument is the more pressing issue that my opponent is yet to show one shred of evidence that seriousness is positive or 'good' in any light or manner.
Shrek is the best movie ever made. Y/N

Rich history of making children believe donkies can talk and that order and society is bad. Shrek has inspired an entire generation to be rebelious hoodlums and show no respect to social order. Shrek is dirty, shrek lives in a swamp and shrek has the most disgisting eating habits i've ever had the bad fortune of laying my eyes apon. There is not a single good/realistic message this "film" has put across. This is why shrek is not a "cinematic madterpeice"
Shrek is the best movie ever made. Y/N

I agree that Shrek is a good film but it has one to many flaws to take the title of "cinematic masterpeice". For starters Shrek is an "Ogre" but lives in a house which is completely absurd because "ogres" are known to be the scourge of the earth which entitles them to living in caves/ mountain sides. Secondly each fairytale figure depicted in all 4 installments of the Shrek series are almost butchered because of the innacuracy. Shrek is a joke of a film and should not be regarded in any way as a "good film". It seems to have been directed by Chance the Rappers equally retarded little cousin from Nigeria. Fvck you and fvck shrek
Abotion should not be looked down upon

In complete neglect of the resolution, my opponent starts with a defense of abortion. However, my opponent must show why I should not look down upon it. What moral stipulation mandates how I SHOULD feel about something? "It is not within any legitmate scope of the government to make attacks on citizens' morals or belief systems, either directly or indirectly." If, according to my opponent, the government has no grounds to question my moral system, why does he? The argument is not over the rightness or wrongness of abortion, but over the way someone ought to feel about it. I can frown upon whatever I please. "I wouldn't come into your home and tell you how to arrange your furniture, as would I hope you wouldn't do that to me. I wouldn't judge you if you chose to abort a fetus, nor would I hope you judge me if it ever came down to that in my personal life." My opponent's argument is absolutely self-refuting. He asserts that one ought not to judge another person. How then does he intend to judge those who frown upon abortion? His point of "judge not lest ye be judged" stands with friction against the resolution. Self-refutation notwithstanding – he has given no reason why "judge not, lest you be judged" is a universally binding edict. "so you (as another human) have no moral highground to tell somebody what they can and can't do, nor can you morally pass laws to ban what may be somebodys only option." Are we to believe that when a man breaks into our home and begins to ravage our belongings that we have no moral option to kindly say, "uh, you can't do that." We cannot tell to the murderer: that was wrong? We cannot tell to the rapist: bad move? We cannot tell to the child molester: what the hell? If we can do none of these things according to my opponent, how then can he tell me how I should and should not feel about abortion? "She is suddenly snatched into an alley and violently raped by a man whom she has no relation to, and could never fully know if he was, infact, suffering from any sexually transmitted diseases. The man who raped her (obviously) didn't use protection and the woman becomes pregnant." And, according to my opponent, we can no more pass judgment on the man who raped the woman then we can the abortion she got thereafter. "Solid fact, in many cases, abortion is the only option" Being a solid fact as it is, I would like to see the evidence that in many cases abortion is the ONLY option. Abortion due to rape comes down to less then 1%.(1) Ectopic pregnancy is the only medical condition in which abortion becomes necessary – this is also less then 1%.(2) Abortions are done for selfish and irresponsible reasons – I can frown upon that all I want. "you as another human being (regardless of what you have instilled in your mind or you hear from your local pastor) have no right to tell these people what they can and can not do with their own bodies" How is it then that my opponent has the right to tell me how I should and should not feel about abortion? 1. http://query.nytimes.com... 2. http://en.wikipedia.org...
Abotion should not be looked down upon

In The Defense of Abortion. Quote- The 1st amendment- "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. It is not within any legitmate scope of the government to make attacks on citizens' morals or belief systems, either directly or indirectly. Granted, this bulletin will probably anger a lot of people who believe that all lives are sacred and it is an innocent human being inside the woman that may be weighing abortion as her last resort. "judge not, lest ye be judged" Let's face it, if you can read this type, you're a human. You're no better than me, and you're no worse than me. I wouldn't come into your home and tell you how to arrange your furniture, as would I hope you wouldn't do that to me. I wouldn't judge you if you chose to abort a fetus, nor would I hope you judge me if it ever came down to that in my personal life. America is based on, more or less, freedom. The freedom to do with yourself what you please, so you (as another human) have no moral highground to tell somebody what they can and can't do, nor can you morally pass laws to ban what may be somebodys only option. Take the case of a rape victim. A young woman walks home after a long night at work, she is poor, barely scraping by, and can barely afford to feed herself, little on a child. She is suddenly snatched into an alley and violently raped by a man whom she has no relation to, and could never fully know if he was, infact, suffering from any sexually transmitted diseases. The man who raped her (obviously) didn't use protection and the woman becomes pregnant. She is faced with many options. On top of being emotionally distressed over the feeling of violation, she is to be called a "baby killer" if she chooses to follow the path of abortion. Many pro-life (funny name considering these people are pro-destroying lives) people would say "could she not just give it up for adoption?" the answer is, no, this too would emotionally affect her knowing that somewhere in the world her bastard child is growing up parentless, taking redicule everyday for being born out of rape. Solid fact, in many cases, abortion is the only option, and you as another human being (regardless of what you have instilled in your mind or you hear from your local pastor) have no right to tell these people what they can and can not do with their own bodies. We are all humans, how we got here may be under debate, but we're here and we need to learn to get along.
Band, Orchestra, and Theatre should not be given Varsity Letters

A slow clap to the opponent. Thank you for accepting my challenge. The opponent has attacked my views on the requirements on a varsity letter. That's fine with me. Rightfully so, many believe that hard work and commitment are what makes a VL important, and that a VL signifies that any school wide activity can receive it. But let's talk about diligence and commitment, which the negative has heavily elaborated upon. In my school orchestra, if you look around from the front of the room, you can see a lack of focus within rehearsal. People are on their phones, playing out of turn and out of tune, or speaking with a friend. Granted, that doesn't speak volumes about the people that are legitimately dedicated- they practice at home, they play with dignity, and they pay close attention to the conductor of the orchestra. But the others piggyback on the orchestra for trips around the United States to perform or, bringing it back to the resolution, for a VL. The students that work hard deserve an award of some sort, that goes without saying. But a VL should be given to those who are risking maladies and severe injuries like concussions, broken bones, torn tendons or ligaments, etc. The unwritten meaning of a VL is for athletics- not for activities where 80% of the people laze around and play a few notes on a fiddle. If somebody asks you if you're in sports, do you respond with a fine art? No. No, you don't. The meaning of a VL will be for sports, as they traditionally have been. A parent of an athlete might have a puzzled look if they see somebody walk by saying "Varsity Band". In conclusion, the meaning of the VL stands firm. The interpretation is becoming, If you may, more liberal or progressive. In high school, a VL may mean the world to someone who gives up hours of their time and so much of their physical strength to achieve. For someone to get the exact award for doing next to nothing is an outrage.
Band, Orchestra, and Theatre should not be given Varsity Letters

The presentation of varsity letters of band, orchestra, and theatre degrade the meaning of the award. As a letterman in two sports, I can talk about the sweat, blood, and even tears I have contributed to the success of my teams, the anguish of practice hours on end, and the injuries that we have all worked hard to avoid or to overcome. I can reference every time I was wheezing to try and keep up with the team when I was out of shape, or the burning of my arms and legs during the horrendous workouts of the offseason. I remember every single time I was screamed at by a coach to give more, work harder, or to not put out. Those are all reasons why you EARN a varsity letter. It is NOT compensation for your tumult, but an award for diligence and skill. I'm not coming into this argument with just one side, either. I am a participant of my High School orchestra, and I enjoy the people and music in the class, no ifs or buts....BUT because it is a competitive activity in the long run, the participants receive a varsity letter during their sophomore year, regardless of other awards or behavior. Absurd. I believe that they should receive a simple certificate that can go on a resume, because to get an honor of an award that prestigious is an insult to all of those who have given all of their physical strength to perform well in their sport. The performing arts people do relatively nothing to Athletes. Sure, they devote time to practice and perform to the best of their ability, but so do we. In the long run, we run the risk of death to do so.
Parenting in the US needs to be more strict, and punishment should be more harsh

I agree with you that parents shouldnt be blamed, and I do agree that parenting is the problem, I am stating that it is the solution to the problem, and for the record, I never stated that the next generation would fail, simply that there will be many problems occur, if things are not changed, and it is getting worse and worse, and the "brat" you speak of is no longer the minority, but rather the majority, and moving on to the "people will always become who they want to become" I believe that parents can change their childrend's oppinions, when their children are young, so that they become a "good kid", also, most people who do make major mistakes at a young age look back and regret it, they dont say "I am sure glad I got expelled", or "I am glad I got knocked up at the age 15", they regret, their descisions, and I think that parents can keep them from making these descisions, with punishment, then when they are out of their parents hands, they can do what they want with their life, I honnestly dont believe that the majority of people who claim to have "Made a bad choice" or "Messed up" have done after they were out of their parents control, or did it because they were never told not to, I think that parenting could solve for these peoples problems, although it is not the cause.
Parenting in the US needs to be more strict, and punishment should be more harsh

I don't think parenting itself needs to be stricter or that punishments whould be more harsh. Every generation thought that their children would not be able to fill their shoes. Look at WWI I'm sure veterans looked at their children and thought they would never be able to do that, those hoolagins listenings to jazz wearing flapper dresses!! And what happened? WWII one of the greatest wins america has ever seen. Do I think some parents are slightly lacks compared to, say, how our grandfather's parents were? yes. But, do I think that this generation is going to fail because of poor parenting? Absolutely not. I will always agree with the phrase "parents do the best job they know how". Some just know better than others. This generation is not a ridiculously corrupt generation. Yes, there are probably worse things in the world now and I fear for my children, but every child in our country is not raised by parents who let them do whatever they want. It is the few brats in this world that make people like you think that the next generation is going to fail. We are not going to fail. Bad parenting, good parenting, strict rules, no rules, a child will turn out however that child chooses to turn out. Period. Blame your mother or father or lack thereof all you want for the way children become lazy, useless adults, but every man for himself (so to speak). As children grow older they can choose to walk all over their parents (given their parent is lackadasical) or rebel against the strict rules governed by their "horribly un-understanding parents". people will always be and become who they want to become. Lacks rules in the house does not ruin a child - or its generation.