Islam is not a religion of peace, and does not have an appropriate system of justice

Thanks for the ideas. I will refute first, give arguments after.(1.1-1.2)IslamAhmadiyya says that Muhammad himself was so heavily persecuted that it shows how peaceful his group is and how savage the rest of the world is.Jesus was also persecuted, so heavily in fact that he was crucified. Is that a sign that Christianity itself is peaceful? Well, no, I mean during the dark ages christians would torture people like IslamAhmadiyya by peeling off his skin, setting him on fire, crushing his hands and legs and poking fire into his body. Just for this reason, I would never trust christianity ever again.Now, Muhammad may have been persecuted and he may not have done anything in retaliation (however various hadith have Muhammad burning people alive and such) you see today muslims responsible for the various human atrocities such as the kidnapping of hindus in India, the murder and torture of bahai's in Iran, the murder and torture of christians in Egypt, and , etc. This is exactly like the dark ages. Islam is in need of reform, or islam will have a place under my shoes. Judaism had a reform (before Hitler persecuted them, they were already reformed) christianity had a reform (during the 20th century) and if ISLAM had a reform as well, it would be good enough for western civilization, but Islam and my opponent are stuck reading verses written in the 7th century and believing they are applicable to modern society. WRONG! (2.0) A reoccurring argument of Islamahmadiyya is that the verses have a historical significance, and should be read and considered in the context of 7th century Asia. I'm sorry, WHAT? You want medieval verses like the ones below to dictate our lives? Sura 5:33 (anyone who is at war with "Allah and his messengers" should be captured, have their feet and hands chopped off, or they should be CRUCIFIED) Sura 5:38 (thieves, both male and female should have their hands chopped off) <I've stolen something before. Should I have my hands chopped off? Sura 5:45 ("...The life for the life, and the eye for the eye, and the nose for the nose, and the ear for the ear, and the tooth for the tooth, and for wounds retaliation...") If the quran is a book revealed to muslims that is mostly in the historical context, why is it considered a perfect, errorless word of God? If it's revealed to in the context of the 7th century, it should have stayed in the 7th century. It's words and laws, if applied to today's world do not create peace and are not adequate forms of justice.(2:178) If the quran is revealed in a way which only the people of the 7th century would understand, then it is no longer holy and helpful to us in today's world. What kind of ABSOLUTELY HOLY BOOK would have medieval ramblings.(2:193) It says to fight until religion is for Allah, and the meccans , as you called them, were not of Allah, so it meant fight until ALL religion is for Allah. Again, why is this fairy tale considered holy writing if it is just a story about a bunch of cave men fighting wars in the 7th century. You keep saying it's all just historical accounts. Well, if that's what it is then there's nothing holy about it, just like the old testament it's just a bunch of ramblings and fairytales. Besides, if muslims ARE supposed to take this literally, then it is a violation of section 2 of the Canadian charter of rights.(2:194) I agree with what you said there.(5:51) No it doesn't say anything about only jews and christians, I read it in context and others can read it in the link. Besides, America, Canada, Europe are all invading the middle east currently, so aren't you basically at war with us? America has many christians, Israel has many jews, and they are hostile and sometimes at war with christians, so your argument has backfired. You should not be taking Christians or jews as friends, thus you are ruining the harmony, thus ruining the peace.http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...(3:149) What you said there didn't make sense so my argument still stands. Muslims are not allowed to obey those who "disblieve" and Anjem Choudary uses that verse to commit havoc across Britain. That is not peaceful.I watched part of the video on youtube. I will not spend an hour watching that whole thing.(2:62) This is a contradiction, it says everywhere else in the Quran that nonmuslims will face doom, hellfire, and such.For the rest of your "peaceful" verses, I may agree, however they do not cancel out the evil verses.Sura 5:33 Sura 5:38Sura 5:45Pure evil.^Also, under islammic law non muslims must pay a tax called Jizyah. how's that for Peace and justice?http://en.wikipedia.org...Thanks and good luck.