It"s Better to be a Dumb White Person Than a Smart Black Person

"I"m unsure your round will be considered valid, posting via pastebin." - Technicalities like this don't hold much validity in face of the truth. "But, I will respect the time you put into it by addressing salient points only. You put me leaky boat that"s taking on too many characters, not good little buddy." - Whatever it takes to win, I guess. By not addressing everything you're simply picking and choosing what you deem acceptable. Picking and choosing like this is not paying attention to points that might be valid by other peoples opinions, not just yours. For instance, you ignored the purpose I stated of what an "idiot defense" actually means, which is that someone must be legally retarded in most cases to claim this. "To the point; character limits per debate round are purposeful in keeping a reader from poking their eyes out over verbiage of encyclopedic lengths." - The point of view of the spectator isn't something to take into consideration in regard to the core of a debate. "single incident covered ... reason to place suppositions on an entire body of people".."Assuming the indication of reality is based what gets news coverage. I don't think it is." "It was necessary to resort to a news site that lack credibility, since no reputable mainstream outlets are covering "stupid white" people activities. This was my point entirely. You can tune a piano but can"t tune-a-fish; the media has not used these incidences as oppor-tuna-ties to show a balanced view http://goo.gl...... ." Not giving reputable sources for your reasoning due to another unproven reasoning of why the media might do something isn't valid. "Dependant on what set of crime rate statistics one wishes to use. They show that rates are fairly equal, but white crime does not get even close to 50% coverage." What is highlighted in the media doesn't necessarily correlate to reality, and since most of what you're saying relies on this assumption, there aren't many solid points to address in defense of myself. There's not much else I can say in place of describing how most of what you're saying is flawed, thus giving the appearance that I don't actually have anything to say. You're giving reasoning that isn't actually eligible to respond concretely to (other than pointing out it's flaws), but I assume this is some form of defensive anecdotal and conjunctional fallacy used to drown out any possibility of me making additional points concerning my arguments outside of how you're, well, wrong. "The black incarceration rates speak for themselves http://goo.gl....... Black Americans are incarcerated at 6 times the rate of whites. http://goo.gl...; This doesn't necessarily equate to racism. Aggresive personality such as sociopathy is a greater problem in some black communities, and crime is a downfall that affects them due to circumstance they sometimes fall under in the US. This is just the US. In places like African during periods that are highly publicized due to the racism that it's designated under, like apartheid, most people are black. "There is no logical reason for a third of blacks ending up in jail other than bias in sentencing. Coincidence is highly improbable. There can be no assumption that all these blacks are stupid." Stupidity isn't correlation for any reason a person might be put in jail. These people who are being put into jail could have a background that predisposes them for it. About a third of blacks living in the US live in poverty (https://www.census.gov...) Saying white people wouldn't have a good reason to riot Is going a little far". "When was the last time you heard of white people rioting for any significant reason?" That's not significant. I assume you're talking about reasons for rioting and not just the type of people involved, since there are rarely just one type of people involved. You're using cherry-picked examples to suffice a point that stands generally. " There"s no coverage to juxtapose white idiocy against what is meaningful and occurring in the Black community. Here are few reasons why moronic whites riot: sport team wins/looses, pumpkins, straw hats, anti disco and cabbage patch dolls, debauchery of Spring Break http://goo.gl....... " - My points above goes again with this, what's in the media doesn't necessarily account for why people might riot, and instances that are centralized around topics of race like the "black riots"... there are not only black people there. I don't think you can find an example of rioting where there's only one race or type of people present. You are saying if A, then B; B, therefore A. "And if it does happen to get a blip on the news, the use of language and terminology is softer than when describing black riots. http://goo.gl...... . Being a white dipstick keeps you under the law and news radar." This is still "affirming the consequence." (https://en.wikipedia.org...) "I have worked with some pretty sharp black people, much brighter than me." - Personal experience rarely holds qualification to speak for such a motion as a whole. Self-evident. The statistics bear me out. Paraphrased: "Among U.S. residents, the number of associate's degrees earned 1999"2000 to 2009"10 earned by Black students increased by 89 percent. During the same time period, the number of bachelor's degrees awarded to Black students increased by 53 percent. Similarly, the numbers of master's degrees earned by Black students more than doubled from 1999"2000..", the number of doctor's degrees awarded increased by 47 percent for Black students" https://goo.gl...... .There are a plethora of intelligent black people. - It was never denied that there are intelligent black people. But saying that you have, say, met someone who had silver skin it doesn't necessarily mean there are many people who have silver skin, even though obviously there are people of any race who are capable of intelligence. Additionally, college education doesn't necessarily accord for employment, even if specifying to say, stem degrees. And saying you have worked with smart black people doesn't necessarily speak for reasons of why some black people are smart. "Merit for my promotion was hardly earned and this bears itself out as well since networking capabilities far outweighs technical abilities when it comes to people of color." - Yes well, socially adept people tend to do better in some jobs. I never said skill was the only thing that matters in a job. "It"s a white man"s old boy/gal networking for the status quo world; a bright black is at a disadvantage. I can only attribute my advancement to my office drinking buddies. http://goo.gl...; - This is assuming that the only thing that really should matter is skill, and that your networking is attributed to bias in the workplace. "being a certain type of white person;" "What does that mean??? Being a white numskull is advantageous. No one feels their job is threaded by me, no one asks for my opinion, because I don"t have one." - People will tell and doofus anything without fear of judgment. The phrase "I don"t know" with a shrug gives me an aura of non-confrontation and allows people to feel more superior to me. I like making people feel good about themselves, even my fellow white nitwits. http://goo.gl...; This is very specific and doesn't stand for being stupid and white as a whole, with most things you're saying being similar. There's not much else to say in response to you other than your personal experience doesn't match the big picture. "pajama pants and how it relates" Higher standard of expectation for blacks than whites." - Again, this is specific to your situation at the time and can't stand for the whole. Part two: http://pastebin.com...