Science does not disprove intelligent design

I apologize for being inactive so long. I just moved and got internet back! Anyways back to the debate:My opponent offers many valid points and comments. However, there are some that need to be addressed.I would like to start out round 3 with a statement my opponent has made, "Disproven by its very nature."This is very debatable. We as humans have a small knowledge of the world, universe, and our existence. What we have discovered and assumed so far is huge, however in the greater scheme of things, we could be completely wrong about what we have previously discovered outside of our viewing range. Science is never capable of proving the non-existence of anything. For example, unicorns. It seems fairly silly, correct? They don't exist. They never have. It is all in fairy tales. Do I believe myself that they exist? No. Do I know that they don't exist? Well, when I truly think about it, no I don't know. Here's the key word: believe. Can science prove that unicorns don't exist anymore than I can? No. All we can really say is that we have been looking for unicorns unsuccessfully for a very long time. Therefore, we may hypothesize from this that unicorns do not exist. The proof that they are not present on earth is not there. Just the same as the proof that they are here on earth is not there. Science can show the specific details and ink in a book, but science will never show the meaning of a book. So the assertion that intelligent design is false until proven otherwise is not necessarily true. Because saying that it is false could be completely and utterly wrong.To prove or disprove the existence of a higher deity, the scientific method must be followed. Of course first, a hypothesis must be proposed (ie: God does/does not exist). At this very first stage is a problem that is run into. How is this god defined? How is it described? How do you characterize a higher being such as this? Us as humans perceive and observe things through our five senses. We see, smell, hear, taste, and touch. This higher deity is not meant to perceived through any of these. With intelligent design, there can be no proving through any human experiment or observation. We are confined to earth with telescopes and other materials that can reach barely outside of our solar system. Through these limitations, the disproving of intelligent design seems to be very dim as going to every corner of the universe where there could be proof does not seem to be the agenda of human beings anytime soon. There are many predictions, assertions, and claims that can be made that render scientific methods of proving it, null.Perhaps we were all made as human beings last Thursday with our memories made with us. You can't disprove that happened. Perhaps you had a previous life and you have no recollection of it, as with the rest of humanity. Again, you cannot disprove that. Disprove in this is a very important word, as my opponent has previously stated. In this way, the claim that humanity, the universe, and all living things were made by a higher power at the beginning of time is something that cannot be disproven. In the words of Carl Sagan, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."Sources: http://www.str.org...http://www.realclearreligion.org...