Jesus Christ had an earthly father

Let me deal with each point you made one by one, as you seem to misread my intentions. (1.) ( "You said this: "It was through her ancestry that Jesus had a birthright in the bloodline of the Tribe of Judah, the line from which all kings of Judah came. The genealogy of Jesus through Mary is not through Solomon, but through Nathan (the second surviving son of King David). Jeconiah was not an ancestor of Mary"s and therefore the blood curse is not upon Jesus" ancestral line through His mother." " Where is this in the Bible?" I"m sorry, can you quote exactly where I made this statement? I read through my argument and could not find anywhere where I made this statement.) I thought you would see the part where you had said "Where is this in the Bible". Which I answered. (2.) (Of course, everything my Creator does among HIS people is a miracle.) I hope I misread this statement, Pro. It seems like you're limiting God's power and ability to work Miracles among Jews. Which is laughable. (3.) (I accept that Solomon"s lineage was cursed, the entire nation of Israel is under curses right now because we broke HIS commandments. Therefore, Israel did not and still doesn"t have a king until Christ returns to deliver us out of this captivity.) I'm confused Pro, do you not believe Jesus Christ is the Messiah? Once again, Jesus could not have been born out of the line of Solomon, due to the blood curse set down upon THAT line by God. You continue to ignore this part. (4.) (Actually, Jesus comes from David and Solomon.) In the legal aspect, yes. However, biologically he solely came from Mary. Mary and Joseph's lineages branch off between Solomon and Nathan. Both were sons of David. Pro seems to lack a knowledge of the difference in family lines, and continues to ignore this. Jesus is still from David's line, however He comes through Nathan, not Solomon. This is because Solomon's line was cursed by God. (5.) (Joseph was of the Line of Solomon." As was Jesus; Matthew 1:6 up above shows the genealogy of Christ.) Once again, I don't dispute this. Jesus was of Joseph's line in the legal aspect, but not the biological aspect. (6.) (And again, Matthew 1:6 says Jesus comes from David and Solomon. Both David and Solomon are listed in the blood line of Christ, therefore Jesus comes from both David and Solomon.) Once again, in the legal sense Jesus is descended from Solomon, but not biologically. It's impossible for Jesus to have been biologically of Solomon's line due to the curse put upon the line of his descendants. Pro, you continually ignore the curse. You can't believe Jesus was the Messiah and also that He is from Solomon's line. Once again, he is from Solomon's line in a legal sense. However, biologically He is from Nathan's line. I have refuted each one of your points. While I accept that there are two lines, what is clear is that Joseph is descended from David, however it is through Solomon's line. Mary is also descended from David, however for her it's through Nathan's line. Solomon's line was cursed, therefore Jesus (Who is the Messiah) could not have come from HIS line. It would be impossible. Now, Mary is a different story. The curse wasn't put down upon Nathan's line, therefore that is the line where Jesus traces his lineage from biologically. Jesus comes from Solomon's line in the legal sense. Nowhere in the Bible is it said explicitly that Joseph is Jesus's adopted father, but it is implied due to the fact that Mary had a virgin birth. So, once again. There are two lineages, however; Solomon's line was cursed. No King would ever come from that line, which is why Joseph isn't Christ's father. However, the other Lineage (Nathan's) wasn't cursed therefore that is the line Jesus came from. Solely through Mary. Pro circumvents the facts, and seems blind to the obvious. He also has racist implications in that He makes it sound like God's salvation isn't for everyone.