The god of the bible would never be dumb enough to ever text as a form of communication to god

Indeed my overboard insults are at many times why I run out of space. You know what, Its worth it. And it you don"t like it, Leave. I"m not going to change for you or anyone else. I"m also not here to please YOU. I also did not ask a splintered yeee ha saddled without his nutrient bars welfare man to enter my debate and make meager attempts to be a 20 watt light bulb constantly turned off that doesn"t know how to do his yoga in the dork, Sorry dark, And be the hypocrite that you are. For the recorded record, I don"t hate you or any christian unless they as so-called christians (because there"s no such a thing as a true christian and that"s according to their hilarious bible as it is impossible to truly follow) go completely overboard with their hypnotic beliefs that naturally cannot be proved" (continuing) um no the ONLY thing I hate is the god according to the bible in which a 0% of this population can even prove exists. ". . . Saying that Trump doesn't debate civilly is NOT the way to make me believe. " Oh knock it off, I used that moron as an example. And I followed up with. . . "Nearly ALL live debates, Someone loses their cool. " Oh but wait with your full head of steam lost in some uncharted rainbow, In which you obviously haven"t paid attention to all that many, Just like you do not pay attention to the bible in which is a free admission of yours, Wow exactly what do you know and or understand? See? That"s yet another reason why this god of YOURS would never even DREAM about using text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible. YOU and billions of those who read text cannot comprehend what is stated even though it is the most simplistic of terms. Now if you screw up THAT badly during the rest of your bumbling disarray of a so-called debate, You know what? I"ll end it right there. "Since Trump does not set an example of good moral behavior"" Well gee, That was not the point now was it, Regardless even though he is completely immoral. Um no its not "maybe I" its maybe you". Now let"s move on as I"m not going to fall into YOUR egotistical pitfalls. "But we should, . . . " Oh wait, But I do. And when other mormons, Oh sorry morons step into the underground of not knowing what they are squawking about (as stated before because like you who don"t have the foggiest idea what you are scrappings about - especially when you freely admit it) gosh darned it all damn right, You deserve to be degraded into the hall of blame. Oh ge we"ve discussed this before and YOU haven"t moved on. YOU have dragged this same subject on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on like a sheep goat spinning his lost yarn. Wow how *yawn* boring. Awe well gee are you out of topics to state or say with what has to do with the main topic? Obliviously. Ogh sorry. Obviously. ---- "Don't you think that's a bad point for you to try to make, " Nope. Moving on. "You said "almost", " Yep. Put on your dunce cap to "comprehend" that "almost" doesn"t meat "everybody". "1. I don't believe you'd know anything about whether certain people you talk to online have real life friends:" Its very easy to spot both online and in real life how people act, What they say and do, How they type, Whether they are lying or telling the truth, Basically who---they---are and it is so easy to spot if they have "genuine" friends or loved ones. That"s the key word I use, "genuine" BIG HUGE MONUMENTAL DIFFERENCE in which I specify very clearly. "You were wrong to say you never get involved with things you don't understand. " Actually that"s not what I said. Do try harder. See that"s why YOUR god would NEVER use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible. OK you had your chance to try to yodel his pouch of meat at his stake while he thinks the witches whichever burns at his almighty psychology poo bears at a murder of his own doing. So the cops have to hire you to find out who killed yourself. Trust me on this" You SUCK at psychology. If this was a game of poker, I"d take all of your chips before you were to have even sat down to the game. So let"s skip on down to where you try to get to the subject matter at hand, IF that"s the case. "Because what you are stating is "memory". Absolutely it does. Gee since you have freely admitted that you don"t know that much about YOUR bible, In which case is nothing on this subject, Those who hanged around with that scab of a jesus, In which nobody can even prove has ever existed, Guess what snookums? They--could--not--read--or--write. So all of it, All the quotes by the apostles were from memory. Oh and btw, IF you were to compare bible from translation to translation and from copy to copy and from dead language to dead language etc etc etc those verses from what god and christ have said HAVE CHANGED. Oh yes, The messages also. To give you some perfect examples. . . Isaiah 45:7 "I form the light, And create darkness: I make peace, And create evil: I the Lord do all these things. " KJV I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, The Lord, Do all these things. " NIV "I create the light and make the darkness. I send good times and bad times. I, The Lord, Am the one who does these things. " NLT 1. The words "peace" and "light" have 0% of anything to do with each other. They are not even synonyms of each other. 2. The words "evil", "disaster" and "bad" have 0% of nothing to do with each other. They are not even synonyms of each other. 3. All 3 versions spread completely different messages. 4. How do you think this god of YOURS feels when HIS language is changed by man to suit man"s wants needs and desires? Do you think this god feels good about it? Y____? N____? Why? Why not? 5. Absolutely in no way possible would this god of the bible ---ever--- communicate in text, The worst form of communication possible because of glaring errors like these. Another example" In the Bishops bible, It was the version right before the KJV, The word "tyrant" in which was used hundreds on times in the Bishop"s bible, Was replaced by the word "king" in the KJV. The word "tyrant" and the word "king" have 0% of anything to do with each other and completely change the messages that the bible was spreading. Yeah YOUR god would REALLY use text as a form of communication - right especially considering the fact that everything in his bible shows that he was a superior ego god complex tyrant? Oh but wait by golly, You haven"t read YOUR bible. Another example Leviticus 20:13 "If a man also lie with mankind, As he lieth with a woman, Both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. " KJV "If a man practices homosexuality, Having sex with another man as with a woman, Both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, For they are guilty of a capital offense. " Yeah the word "homosexuality" was not put into the bible until 1946. Who told these interpreters to update the bible to their will? Who says they got it right with other verses that THEY have updated? If a man sleepeth with a man, By lechery of a woman, Ever either hath wrought unleaveful thing, Die they by death; their blood be on them. (If a man sleepeth with a man, Like in fleshly coupling with a woman, They both have done an unlawful thing, And they both shall be put to death; their blood be on them. ) WYC Huh? Yep that"s what it says. Se habla Espanol? Do you really think YOUR god would be stupid enough to use text with all these glaring mistakes? Here's some point bank glaring contradictions from a book in which is supposed to be perfect. GE 1:31 God was pleased with his creation. GE 6:5-6 God was not pleased with his creation. (Note: That God should be displeased is inconsistent with the concept of omniscience as well as with the fact that God allegedly does not change his mind: NU 23:19-20, 1SA 15:29, JA 1:17. ) GE 2:17 Adam was to die the very day that he ate the forbidden fruit. GE 5:5 Adam lived 930 years. GE 4:9 God asks Cain where his brother Able is. PR 15:3, JE 16:17, 23:24-25, HE 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees everything. Nothing is hidden from his view. GE 4:15, DT 32:19-27, IS 34:8 God is a vengeful god. EX 15:3, IS 42:13, HE 12:29 God is a warrior. God is a consuming fire. EX 20:5, 34:14, DT 4:24, 5:9, 6:15, 29:20, 32:21 God is a jealous god. LE 26:7-8, NU 31:17-18, DT 20:16-17, JS 10:40, JG 14:19, EZ 9:5-7 The Spirit of God is (sometimes) murder and killing. NU 25:3-4, DT 6:15, 9:7-8, 29:20, 32:21, PS 7:11, 78:49, JE 4:8, 17:4, 32:30-31, ZP 2:2 God is angry. His anger is sometimes fierce. 2SA 22:7-8 (KJV) "I called to the Lord;. . . He heard my voice;. . . The earth trembled and quaked, . . . Because he was angry. Smoke came from his nostrils. Consuming fire came from his mouth, Burning coals blazed out of it. " EZ 6:12, NA 1:2, 6 God is jealous and furious. He reserves wrath for, And takes revenge on, His enemies. ". . . Who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? His fury is poured out like fire, And rocks are thrown down by him. " 2CO 13:11, 14, 1JN 4:8, 16 God is love. GA 5:22-23 The fruit of the Spirit of God is love, Joy, Peace, Patience, Kindness, Goodness, Faithfulness, Gentleness and self-control. GE 12:7, 17:1, 18:1, 26:2, 32:30, EX 3:16, 6:2-3, 24:9-11, 33:11, NU 12:7-8, 14:14, JB 42:5, AM 7:7-8, 9:1 God is seen. EX 33:20, JN 1:18, 1JN 4:12 God is not seen. No one can see God's face and live. No one has ever seen him. Conclusion god would NEVER use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible to god, With all the point blank errors that the bible clearly has that any supreme deity would have foreseen long before one word of text would ever be scribbled to tell a story in the way this god character has described himself in the bible as a superior ego god complex, In which the bible is entirely about and nothing more.