Geocentricism

"My opponent forgot one teensy-weeny thing"And my opponent forgot nobody cares about his boring maths that don't help anybody understand anything."THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS THE SAME FOR ALL OBSERVERS"Wrong! Special Relativity only deals with observers that are either: moving in a straight line at unchanging speed, or not moving at all Such frames will all percieve the speed of light to be the same. However, General Relativity deals with observers that are moving at changing speeds and directions and the speed of light is not the same for such observers.I don't even believe in either Relativity theory but you do, so your misunderstanding of it makes you look really bad. It's like you forgot all of General Relativity!"Einstein's theory of Relativity clearly predicts the Michelson-Morley experiment, even though it wasn't specifically meant for this expirement."Wrong! Einstein himself said Relativity was specifically meant for that experiment: "In my student years, I came to know the strange result of Michelson's experiment ... This was the first path which led me to the special theory of relativity." (1) "As you can see, Einstein's theory of Relativity clearly predicts the Michelson-Morley expirement"Wrong! The experiment inspired the theory. The theory didn't predict the experiment.The theory was created the explain the fact that they couldn't find the expected motion between Earth and the aether. My explanation is that Earth isn't moving. Your explanation, and Einstein's, is length contraction and time dilation, which is just crazy. My explanation is better because it's simpler, easier to understand, and actually makes logical sense. A.) Explain how the sun would rotate around the earth, even though the Sun's mass is hundreds of thousands times that of Earth's... unless my opponent would care to disprove both Einstein's and Newton's theories of gravity (which haven't failed a single test so far)First of all, they've both failed plenty of tests. Secondly, Einstein's General Relativity says the sun can revolve around Earth, no problem. Thirdly, Isaac Newton said geocentrism could be true in Proposition 43 in the Principia, even though he didn't publish it. (2) Here is what Newton said: "In order for the Earth to be at rest in the center of the system of the Sun, Planets, and Comets, there is required both universal gravity and another force in addition that acts on all bodies equally according to the quantity of matter in each of them and is equal and opposite to the accelerative gravity with which the Earth tends to the sun ... Since this force is equal and opposite to its gravity toward the Sun, the Earth can truly remain in equilibrium between these two forces and be at rest. And thus celestial bodies can move around the Earth at rest, as in the Tychonic system." This is the Tychonic system, the geocentric system I believe in: B.) Explain the retrograde motion of Mars to be EXACTLY what we observeMars orbits the sun while the sun revolves around Earth. Here's a really good animation to show you what I mean:www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQ4yDZKHd5MC.) Explain the phases of VenusVenus orbits the sun while the sun revolves around Earth. Here's a really good picture to show you what I mean: D.) How day and night and seasons workDay and night are caused by the sun's 24 hour revolution around Earth. The seasons are caused by the center of the sun's daily revolution annually oscillating.E.) The planet's moonsThe planets' moons orbit their planets just like in heliocentrism.F.) How we are able to detect exoplanets via Doppler shift and Transit method if the star goes around the planet(s)I never said stars orbit planets."Oh, and show how evidence for each part of the model... don't simply say "It's obvious", you're the one who called me Stupid :)."I never called you stupid.How about you show evidence for heliocentrism or relativity or whatever you believe in, if you even know what you believe in?(1) A speech by Albert Einstein. Search Google for "How I created the Theory of Relativity", it's the first result.(2) Steven Weinberg, To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science, page 251