This is why you can't have a constitutional amendment that reads: "A marrige is between two people"

It is impossible to write a Constitutional Amendment to include same sex couples without discriminating against other people of either sex. As it stands now there is no Constitutional Amendment to define marriage. But we as a society haven't needed one until recently because all common sense has gone out the window with regard to this subject. There is only one thing that needs to be said if you have any common sense. Homosexuals cannot procreate. Anyone who claims to be homosexual and has children through natural means is not homosexual they are bi-sexual furthermore anyone who has had sexual relations with both sexes even though no children were produced are also bi-sexual and cannot be counted as true homosexuals. Marriage is currently defined as a union between a man and a women, which is the way nature intended it to be. One can make all the arguments they want that homosexual activity takes place in the animal kingdom and therefore it is natural for humans to. But in the animal kingdom the animals are often attacked and killed or run off or rejected. Natural selection almost always prevents these animals from passing on their genes thus limiting their numbers. But we are not animals, we are human beings. We are suppose to understand why homosexual behavior is not conducive to society. Homosexuals cannot procreate not now not by accident not ever. I have three homosexual couples as neighbors, one on ether side of me and one and one across the street. I find it curios that all of them agree with my position. None of them wants to marry because of the financial implications that go with divorce. All of them accept one are also Republicans which I find even more perplexing. They are all great people and one couple has the keys to my house. So with that said, please no comments about me being a bigot, I am not and have never been even though taking a politically incorrect stance makes you one automatically. Now on to the funny part: Don't know who wrote this but lets open up Pandora's box shall we!!! City Hall in San Francisco ( A scene at City Hall in San Francisco ) "Next." "Good morning. We want to apply for a marriage license." "Names?" "Tim and Jim Jones." "Jones? Are you related? I see a resemblance." "Yes, we're brothers." "Brothers? You can't get married." "Why not? Aren't you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?" "Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!" "Incest?" No, we are not gay." "Not gay? Then why do you want to get married?" "For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other. Besides, we don't have any other prospects." "But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who've been denied equal protection under the law. If you are not gay, you can get married to a woman." "Wait a minute. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as I have. But just because I'm straight doesn't mean I want to marry a woman. I want to marry Jim." "And I want to marry Tim, Are you going to discriminate against us just because we are not gay?" "All right, all right. I'll give you your license. Next." "Hi. We are here to get married." "Names?" "John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson." "Who wants to marry whom?" "We all want to marry each other." "But there are four of you!" "That's right. You see, we're all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane loves me and June, June loves Robert and Jane, and Robert loves June and me. All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express our sexual preferences in a marital relationship." "But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples." "So you're discriminating against bi bisexuals!" "No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's just for couples." "Since when are you standing on tradition?" "Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere." "Who says? There's no logical reason to limit marriage to couples. The more the better. Besides, we demand our rights! The mayor says the constitution guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!" "All right, all right. Next." "Hello, I'd like a marriage license." "In what names?" "David Deets." "And the other man?" "That's all. I want to marry myself." "Marry yourself? What do you mean?" "Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two together. Maybe I can file a joint income-tax return." "That does it! I quit!! You people are making a mockery of marriage!!" I'm am not opposed to civil unions that allow for power of attorney and hospital visitation rights though. But none of the other rights that go with marrige as it is defined today.