Modern Day Jews are not the real Jews

Please show me the verse that says none of the twelve tribes of Israel were white.The God is not going to give you the answers as you please. HE wants you to do the work and search the scriptures (John 5:39).If the Jews calling themselves Jews in Israel aren't the true Jews... why do you call them Jews? Because they say they are "Jews", that's why I'm calling them "Jew-ish".All of the people who call themselves Jews in Israel aren't at war. The entire nation of Israel is at war. The Palestinians and Israel; Israel and Iraq, etc... the entire nation of Israel is made up of what? "Jew-ish" individuals.Everybody in the verse you posted has been, or will be a slave... what's your point?My point is that they do not have slaves, which proves God is not dealing with them and modern day Israel.You left out the part that says, "and are not," from both verses of your summary, which totally changes what they say.Uhh no. If you read Revelation 2:9 & 3:9, I posted the correct Scripture and they have "and are not". "and are not" is Christ saying that they are calling themselves Jews, but they are not.....so I don't understand what you were intending to say there.I advise you to be careful of adding or taking words out of The Book of Revelation just to make points on a website... Revelation 22:18-19.I have not taken any words or added any words to the verse I used.I'm going to skip your argument on the nations that took you captive; because the verse you quoted to justify it, Ge. 15:13 only says "a nation;" Yes, it says a nation because the Egyptians is the nation that took us captive. EGYPT The Sudanese, Watusis & Zulus – 400 years from 1846 – 1446 B.C. read Genesis 15:13. And how do you suppose this would prove the modern day Israelis aren't related to Isaac?They do not fit the curses of slavery. They are at war; they are committing very wicked sins; they do not have slaves and because they are Khazar Edomites.No, everyone in biblical times wasn't dark skinned, see...My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.Song of Solomon 5:10.Who is this making refference to? and metaphorically, what is it saying because Solomon said he is black.Song of Solomon 1:5 I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon.Adam's name tells you the color of Adam.In Hebrew adam means:To show the blood in the face, ie. flush or turn rosy:-be (dyed, made) red (ruddy)... and that's where the word edem from. I don't want to jump off topic, but I'm going to refute this whole Adam was red thing. Adam was a reddish brown color or brown. Let's examine the name Adam132. admoniy, ad-mo-nee´; or (fully) admowniy, ad-mo-nee´; from 119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion):—red, ruddy. The definition of the word "red" described here is "admoniy" reddish of the hair or complexion. But it has its root meaning at 119 119. adam, aw-dam´; to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:—be (dyed, made) red (ruddy). So now RED is used to physically describe Esau/Edom which derives from the word "adam" which means "to show blood". However we do know that adam was created from earth making him a dark/brown complexion. Gen. 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. The hebrew word for "ground" here is: 127. adamah, ad-aw-maw´; from 119; soil (from its general redness):—country, earth, ground, husband(-man) (-ry), land. Which also derives from Strong's definition 119 meaning "red". But we must ask ourselves, "Why is Adam who is made of the "brownish" earth called "RED". Is it his physical description? Not at all! Do not all people on the earth today come from Adam? Are all people brown? NO! so we must learn that the name "adam" (Strongs 119) also has a root (this is what many overlook!) 1818. dam, dawm; from 1826 (compare 119); blood (as that which when shed causes death) of man or an animal; by analogy, the juice of the grape; figuratively (especially in the plural) bloodshed (i.e. drops of blood):—blood(-y, -guiltiness, (-thirsty), + innocent. "DAM" is the hebrew word for BLOOD and we all know what color blood is. All the words that describe the word "RED" has a form of the word "DAM"(=Blood) in it describing the origin of its redness (being blood) Red- admoniy, awdam, adam, even Edom!! 123. Edom, ed-ome´; or (fully) Edowm, ed-ome´; from 122; red (see Gen. 25:25); Edom, the elder twin-brother of Jacob; hence the region (Idumaea) occupied by him:—Edom, Edomites, Idumea. 122. adom, aw-dome´; from 119; rosy:—red, ruddy. So why is Adam described as "red"? He's not! He is described as looking like the earth or ground however seeing we all come from Adam we are descendants of his "blood (DAM)" lineage. All men alive carry the "blood" or life source of man called "DAM" hence all men were named Adam at one point. Gen. 5:2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. 120. adam, aw-dawm´; from 119; ruddy i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.):—x another, + hypocrite, + common sort, x low, man (mean, of low degree), person. This definition of "adam" has its origin still at 119 but defines itself as "the human race" seeing we all carry the DAM or BLOOD of the first man. Examine Acts 17:26 And hath made of one blood (from Adam) all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; So all men and women have their origin with ONE BLOOD beginning with ADAM. Hence the suffix DAM in his name. So as some falsely teach, "If Adam was created of earth and physically described as the complexion of the rich soil, then how can Edom/Esau who is described as RED just like ADAM be the RED (caucasian) race? Easy? Remember Adam's name comes from the blood/DAM (which is without doubt red) he possesses and not his outer physical attributes. Edom on the other hand was described as being RED "outwardly". Gen. 25:25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. Esau is Edom and is described RED unlike Jacob who also came out of the same WOMB. Why does RED trace back to adam in the lexicons? lets see... 132. admoniy, ad-mo-nee´; or (fully) admowniy, ad-mo-nee´; from 119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion):—red, ruddy. Now according to Genesis 5:2, wasn't every male and female called ADAM? Yes! So wouldn't Esau have already been RED? along with Jacob, Isaac, and every descendant of Adam? Yes! So why is there a need to describe Edom/'Esau as red in Genesis 25:25? Because this man was now "outwardly" Red!! whereas everyone else was RED/adam/dam internally seeing our blood is within us. But Edom's BLOOD,adam,DAM penetrates through his skin thus making him outwardly RED. This definition hurts their whole doctrine whereas they try to say the red used to describe Esau/Edom is of a reddish brown color. Oh Really? Examine 2Kings 3:22 And they rose up early in the morning, and the sun shone upon the water, and the Moabites saw the water on the other side as red asblood: the definition of RED and BLOOD used here is as follows... 122. adom, aw-dome´; from 119; rosy:—red, ruddy. 1818. dam, dawm; from 1826 (compare 119); blood (as that which when shed causes death) of man or an animal; by analogy, the juice of the grape; figuratively (especially in the plural) bloodshed (i.e. drops of blood):—blood(-y, -guiltiness, (-thirsty), + innocent. So now red used here clearly describes RED as a visual color and again has its origin at 119 and is used synonymously with BLOOD or DAM You are assuming facts, which you have yet to prove.Luke 21:24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.All nations have taken us captive. We are in American, Canada, UK, Italy, India, ect...."and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles"The real Jerusalem was destroyed by the Gentiles or the heathen."until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled."The Gentiles here is talking about the Northern Kingdom of Israel or the disperesed.John 7:35 Then said the Jews among themselves, Whither will he go, that we shall not find him? will he go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles? The precept to Luke 21:24Romans 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.Revelation 13:10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints. Do the "Jew-ish" in Israel today have the slaves that led them into captivity? They do not, this also shows they are not the Biblical Israelites.Another point I'd like to make is, if the "Jew-ish" are the real Israelites, why don't they believe in the New Testament if the birht of Christ is prophecised in the Old Testament.Deuteronomy 18:18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. Acts 3:22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. Isaiah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. Matthew 1:22-23 22 Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, 23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.Immanuel & Emmanuel have the same meaning.