I would make a better world dictator

1. The forced slavery is simply a solution for poverty and a useful method to handle prisoners. The slavery is just temporary and the people will be freed with plenty of money for them to rejoin the world with. Consider it an indentured slavery.Any kind of slavery will cause immense riots. You would be "endenturing" millions of people. Entire countries of people are poor. They would all have to be enslaved by your standards.Your regime also creates more than one type of slavery. You create slaves for yourself.Again, I think it is related to narcissism. People in your country cannot used more advanced technology because you do not want them to. The country is officially Christian because your Christian. People are slaves even though you would never be. If other debates can be evidence, there is a dress code because you want people to dress a certain way.With you, it is not about the People. It is about you acquiring power.2. History shows that a good economy often overwhelms pride in one's country. There will be tolerance for everyone so they would not be as likely to revolt. If they do, the military will silence it quickly.Pride in one's country will cause problems, but they could be dealt with, like you said, with a good economy. Now, relocating entire cities and provinces of people at a time cannot be done without causing outrage.Good luck at trying to stop at least 600,000,000 people3. I never stated that I would not allow them to speak freely. It is your opinion that my country would be bad, and all you continue to repeat is your opinion with little evidence.You more than imply it. Pride in your country is outlawed. So if someone comes around waving a red, blue, and white flag, proclaiming "'MURICA!", you would have no choice but to detain him, or to let this pride go free.You likely outlaw the Internet ("no smartphones"), and this is the biggest means of peoples' communication.We must not go against you fascist regime, or else we will be (according to other debates) flogged, beat, tortured, etc. for our "crimes".4. I never said I would restrict individual values. I would keep families together, just not countries or cities.If you relocate a Canadian family to Mexico, chances are you've separated them from their extended family.If you make the nation Christian, that means that you say that your religion is right over every other.5. Again, an organized revolt would be virtually impossible since it would be too difficult for everyone to rally together.You can seperate people, but not HUMANITY. You can redistribute races, but whites, blacks, asains, etc. all will band together. Don't you see the folly of your plans?! 6. It is your opnion that my leaders would not allow religious freedom.If you make the national religion Christian, that is illicitely saying that your religion is right and that all others are wrong. And even if you don't mean it that way, zealots (you and your governors) can always say "The national religion is Christian, so we can discriminate." It's happened all over the Middle East, Israel, and even America.7. What you fail to understand is, yes, one generation faces some short term sacrifices, however, the world would be a better place for all future generations.You won't get the chance! Relocation, slavery, religious favoritism (which can bring with it homophobia, racism, sexism, agism, etc.) will all cause an uproar from at least a quarter of the world.1. I am not crazy, I am just different. People everyday seem to think I am crazy because my logic is significantly different from theirs.I do not mean this offensively, but... What if they're right? Schizophrenics, psycopaths, and sociopaths generally do not realize that they're crazy.You may be different, but you may be off. Is there a history of mental illness in your family?If you continue to insist that I do have some sort of mental issue, I will say this:George S. Patton thought he was the reincarnation of not one, but several famous generals.Ulysses S. Grant was an "angry drunk"Stonewall Jackson had multiple disabilities.Sherman was chronically depressed.It looks to me like many famous generals with problems were amazing leaders. Why would I be any different? Were Patton and Grant disregarded because of their problems? No. Were they successful? Very.A general is different than a leader of the world. Grant was president (I think) but he was only crazy when he was DRUNK! And Patton... Who?Now you, on the other hand, do not care about your people as evidenced by your policies. You are selfishly imposing your beliefs on the WORLD.______________________________________The Union of Earth would be free, as opposed to my opponents TYRANY.I would make the world happy. And, if the People happy, they could impeach me. Condemn me. Torture me. Kill me. Forget me.I would actually like for the world to join together into a similar world as the one I have outlined. But, it has to be a choice. And we will make the choice one day. Or maybe not. The choice is ours.But on the occassion of choosing our own fates, we must not fall into a trap of tyrany. We must keep the value of the Vox Populi, at exclusion of all else.And if tyrany comes, we must unite together as a symbol of freedom.