Sun rotation causes the Earth's rotation | the Sun and Earth revolve each other.

"In the case of Quad Helix theory, I'm your teacher. You should begin by accepting my teaching so that Quad Helix theory makes sense to you"Basically, Pro is saying I must accept everything he says just because he says so."Con, I specifically claimed that I proved Quad Helix theory by wise sense, and said that I couldn't prove 'a wise sense'; implying that if you were wise, with your senses you could prove Quad Helix theory."But using the same logic I could say something like : Quad helix is false because I'm so wise and fantastic that my six sense feels the falseness of that theory, if you were so wise as me you would understand. "The total Sol [referral; round 1 definition of Sol] power in the universe causes planets to be spherical. The Sun in the centre of our galaxy stabilizes Earth's rotation; had the Sun not been there, Earth's mass wouldn't hold, and in frictionless space it would become void. The Sun is the force which causes the “day rotation of Earth” effect. The anti rotation which you speak about is only logical moments after Earth's genesis, where it's rotation was chaotic, not in harmony with a Sun, but rather primal Sol power."But in the same way, if the other things that caused the sun didn't exist, we wouldn't have an earth. So the sun is not the only thing that makes our existence possible.Also, the sun is not the center of our galaxy."You're completely wrong, everything is a fraction of the transcendent Quad Helix, and a power of the transcendent Quad Helix. It most definitely accounts for spirals, for they can be divided by four quarters or quadrants. It also accounts for proportions of the body, for we have symmetrical sides, front facing senses and more attributes that are a fraction of four."Spirals are formed with the golden ratio, not a power of 4. Symmetry implies two, and two is not a power of four. Also, pi is not a power of four. Saying everything is a power of four is nonsensical, reminds me of the movie 23. "The Quad Helix theory describes intricately the proportions of a human but I haven't mentioned it in this argument; I'm sure you won't understand,(...) Your school was wrong, your teachers were wrong, and you're wrong; the only thing schools and teachers are producing in the modern era is a barren Earth."Just some arrogant statements with no proof or logic behind. This doesn't provide anything to the debate, and the arrogant conduct of Pro must be taken into account."most of those who found success in support of thinking in words were unintelligent"How he knows this? Does he knows the works of those linguistic philosophers? Pro show a lack of knowledge of the history of science and philosophy and a lack of respect towards anything that may boycott his "theory"."Yes it does, it shows that things can be proven through wise sense (talking about his example on the previous round)"No, it doesn't. It shows you can prove things empirically. Wise sense was not proved, but as you described it's just knowing without any process in the middle. However Touching a wall and seeing a door is not wise sense, but touch and sight."I'm sure I'm of a higher intelligence"That's what I call ending a preaching. A total demonstration of arrogance, selfishness and narcissism. If you can't prove what you say, and you can't accept your errors, don't participate in a debate. Pro used an even smaller font, making it unreadable. This must be taken into account for conduct.