Donald Trump on attacking syria for gas attacks

If I'm not mistaken, I believe there was two times when Donald Trump attacked Syria for gasing his own people. The second time he attacked them he did not go for any of their military stations, Instead, He went straight towards the chemical weapons facilities. This, In my opinion was the smartest move to make because it not only warns them that we are not afraid to attack them if we feel like we have to, But it also eliminates some of the problem by hindering their ability to produce the very chemicals that was used to gas their own people. The fact that Donald Trump acted very quickly is, In my opinion, Another good decision by him. By reacting so quickly he is sending a message that we are not hesitant to make a move. Some people interpret his quick actions as a sign of weakness because they believe that mistakes could easily be made without having the proper time to carefully evaluate the situation at hand, Making him be perceived as someone who is blatantly ruthless and reckless, Someone who acts before they speak or think. While can be true, It is actually more beneficial to us in this attack since this can be easily turned into a fear factor from other countries that wants to provoke us or defy our commands. If they fear how ruthless or reckless we are, They will more likely think twice about doing whatever they do. Sometimes the best way to solve a problem is to be quick. Be quick and go hard. Now you say that it worsens our relations with Syria and Russia. Ok, I can kinda accept that, But I still believe that it was the best decision to make. The goal here is to send a clear, Strong, And powerful message. DO NOT COMMIT WAR CRIMES OR WE WILL RETALIATE. And nothing can send this message clearer than showing our ruthless side. Going by the soft action would not be as effective since it takes too much time and punishing them over a long period of time over something they did that lasted for only a few days is not appropriate. Even after Syria learned their lesson they would still feel the pressure of the sanctions. Psychologically speaking if one learns not to do something again but feels like they are still being punished will still hurt the relations far worse than a shorter burst of punishment. Ironically, The Assad was completely unfazed by the attacks and for some reason is even more confident that the US is not as powerful as they seem, But regardless I bet he wouldn't gas his own people again, And if he does, I'll be damned. And really, To be honest, I really don't think our relations with Russia was ever going to improve, At least not when Putin is in charge. You may actually be surprised at how many countries actually approved of Donald Trump's strikes in Syria. Fun fact: Most developed countries approved his attacks including Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Australia, Israel, Japan, The United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Germany and France. But not just most developed countries, But even the people of Syria approved as well. Before Donald Trump was even president, The people of Syria had always cried for help. For many years they wanted the US to intervene, But the US never did. It wasn't until when Donald Trump took office. The first time Assad gased his own people, Donald Trump took action and attacked Syria, The people of Syria cheered in joy. There was a video I saw online quite a while back that demonstrates how the Syrians have felt when the US finally intervened. I would like to refer to this video https://www. Cnn. Com/videos/world/2017/04/07/syrian-survivor-thanks-trump-nr. Cnn in support of my position that it did more good than bad Though the second attack on Syria wasn't as ruthless as some of the people of Syria had hoped for. Ironically, The Syrian people who supported Donald Trump's attacks were disappointed that Donald Trump didn't go as hard as they thought, And the people who didn't support Donald Trump's attacks actually cheered because of the same reason, They thought that the US was weak. I just thought I should mention this if you haven't known already. To be clear again, I don't think that Donald Trump's motive to attack Syria was to protect the Syrian people as much as not allowing the Syrian government to use illegal gas weapons because that would be considered as a war crime. Crimes against humanity. I mean bombing them is already bad enough, But so much can only be done to prevent that completely. If Donald Trump was this humanitarian, I'm sure he would have done more than just protect the people of Syria, But he understands that war crimes are not to be tolerable which is why he felt like he needed to intervene. Bombing them is one thing, Gasing them is a whole other level. - Also could you tell me about the lawyers who can take Assad to trial, I never heard of such lawyers. I mean I've heard of the UN, Maybe that's what you're talking about?