Ministry to a girl facing execution

Thank you for your response.Point 1 - No SupernaturalI think you might have misunderstood my point because what you posted seems to have no relation to my argument.I make the argument that Jesus is not divine, the afterlife does not exist and that there is no method for eternal life. I put the onus on you to prove that these things exist as they do not mesh with observable reality and their existence is required for your argument to succeed. If you fail to do so then the pastor has advised the girl incorrectly because his claims about eternal life are false.Whether or not the pastor agrees with the punishment has no bearing on this. What matters is if his claims about eternal life are true.Point 2 - Not matching Christian scripture and beliefsAgain, this doesn't seem to actually have any relation to my argument. As I have shown, even if a mechanism for afterlife did exist then Christian belief is that sincere repentence is not enough to get eternal life. It must be done in conjunction with accepting Jesus as your lord and saviour.Therefore "the pastor is not merely telling the woman to repent but to genuinely repent and to ask for forgiveness" is entirely irrelevent as it does not deal with the issue I have raised which is that the pastor never mentions acceptence of Jesus Christ which is a core component of getting eternal life in basically every Christian denomination.Point 3 - False claims about her being certain to dieThis response is on topic so I will address it more fully.Firstly, to correct you where you have alleged I made a mistake: the US does use gas chambers. Not often but as shown in my previous source it does use them. 5 states currently use the gas chamber, usually as a fallback method if for some reason lethal injections can't be used (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org...). The states are Arizona, California, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Wyoming.Now moving on, if you want to posit that this takes place in some nation that is completely different from any on Earth currently then you may and that removes part of the objection based on the assumption it is in the USA. However the root of the problem remains. just because the girl has been schedulued to be execvuted tomorrow, it does not mean she will be executed as humanity has agency to make its own decisions.Whatever nebulous country this takes place in, the pastor is not all-knowing and all powerful. He doesn't know if there'll be a natural disaster tomorrow that will delay the execution for a few weeks. He doesn't know if there'll be a prison break and the girl will escape. Whatever is the authority in charge could have a change of heart and offer commutation of the girl's sentence. There could be a coup and the new regime could be anti-death penalty. A hundred other things could happen.Although it is very likely she will die, he is still wrong when he proclaims her death tomorrow as a certainty. He has absolutely no way to know that. Indeed bible versus warn against such predictions:James 4:14 - Yet you do not know what your life will be like tomorrow. You are just a vapor that appears for a little while and then vanishes away.Ecclesiastes 8:7-8 - For he has absolutely no knowledge what will happen, since who can declare to him when it will come about? Just as no human being has control over the wind to restrain it, so also no human being has control over the day of his death. Just as no one is discharged during war, so wickedness will not release those who practice it.Proverbs 27:1 - Do not boast about tomorrow, For you do not know what a day may bring forth.So based not just on common sense and humanity's natural eagency but also the scripture of his own religion, the pastor cannot predict when the little girl will die. If he had couched it differently then it would have been acceptable ("It seems almost certain you will die, therefore you should repent", etc) then he would have been fine but he expressed it as a certainty he is wrong.Lastly I would point out that you haven't really made any positive arguments to support your POV, just tried to rebutt mine.If you don't actually offer an argument of your own as to why the pastor is right as well as rrebutting my bits, it seems like it will be impossible for you to win this debate.