Evolution (Pro) vs Creationism (Con)

Thank you very much for that… interesting response. In the opening sentence I said, “First round will be acceptance, to make it fair.” I’m not sure if my opponent is just extremely unintelligent, or extremely and obnoxiously rude. I will go with extremely unintelligent for right now. The very title of this debate is; Evolution vs Creationism. My opponent has not given any evidence to show that his view; creationism, is dominant and true over evolution but proceeds to try to prove God exists. My opponent’s only argument was; 7 different citations from the Bible (I think, it was all very confusing), and some kind of evidence that God exists (which is not actually what this debate is about if you would care to read the title) through codes of DNA translating a secret coded message that relates to a verse in the Bible. Wow. Rebuttal: “To add on to that, Matthew Boulder, chief linguist said and I quote ‘As for the evidence- it is there and it is, to my view, undeniable. The very word of God elegantly weaved in and out of our very bodies and souls, as plain as day. And the beauty of it, that God would lay down the words of truth in our very beings, shows his love and The Miracle." The very most we can conclude from this, is that Matthew Boulder very well might be the most religious and biased scientist ever. My opponent of course didn’t cite any sources; I eventually found the site mt opponent used http://witscience.org... Now to defeat this argument. There are about 32 billion base pairs, or letters that make up the human genome. In order to list all of these, you would need to type 60 words per minute, 8 hours a day, for around 50 years. Out of the 32 billion letters, there is a very, very, very probable chance that a sentence would form and fit a language. Or even a sentence that kind of sounds like it could be from the Bible. There is also an equal amount of chance that a sentence would come out as saying, “God does not exist.” This is a very weak argument; that somehow God is trying to show his presence by communicating with us through lines of genetic code. It is actually amusing that my opponent sincerely believes that their God is communicating to them through lines of genetic DNA code. My opponent then says all this, “Wow!! Now how are you going to rebuttal that?” “Now, I believe that you will have no rebuttals to the written word of God. How could you even doubt God” “Now, to add onto the dying part, would you like to hear this” My opponent obviously thinks that they are a very witty and clever character. My opponent thinks that the truth and holiness of God will rain over me and defeat me, and that I have no chance of winning this debate, because I cannot deny the words of God. To my opponent, You amuse me. Sincerely, Your 13 year old atheist friend, Hayden Conclusion: I was looking forward to having a good debate with an intelligent person, but sadly that has not happened. My opponent’s only argument, besides throwing random verses at me, was about some coded message from God through DNA. I have already defeated it, and since that was the only argument my opponent proposed, I am finished. Thank you. http://publications.nigms.nih.gov... http://askabiologist.asu.edu...