The Sweden Democrats are xenophobic, racist, and anti-immigration

Before starting this debate, I would like to apologize for any issues with the sources in previous arguments as they have been glitching for both of us. I will post the sources I meant to post previously in the comments section.MulticulturalismMy opponent has seemed to attack my sources to disvalidate my claims, rather than addressing some of my claims directly. Furthermore, a bias to an article does not mean the original story they are telling is false, but my opponent has immeditely assumed everything stated in the articles were false based on the source. The article that was not found due to glitches in posting sources has been posted in my link above.Furthermore, I had used the second source (which pro is addresing to refute my claims) only for part of it's statements on no go zones existing. Furthermore, the source does describe these no go zones where the Swedish government and police fail to enforce their law. In addition to tihs, many of these areas are in migrant/muslim-majority areas, and many criminal gangs turning areas into "no go zones" are predominately Muslim gangs. Based on the radicalization of many Muslims in Sweden particularly, it is likely that many of these criminal gangs are attempting to enforce Sharia law. Furthermore, Pro points out that another source I used to where a 60 minutes film crew were attacked, did not state that it was from immigrants. However, the reporters described the people as masked African men, and they were reporting on the refugee crisis. Based on the fact that most African Swedes are of an Islamic migrant background and the topic of the film they were producing, it is reasonable to conclude that the attack was in fact by migrants angered at them addressing the issue. Furthermore, Pro attacks my argument by saying the source I used blamed the Sweden Democrats. None the less, I have only used the source as evidence of these attacks. I had never stated to agree with their conclusion that the Sweden Democrats could have been blamed for this.Immigrant Sweden DemocratsMy opponent seems to disvalidate my statement by comparing it to someone stating one can't be racist if they not black and have black friends. None the less, the original argument only shows that the party is not neccessarily hateful of immigrants and against immigration if it attracts many immigrants, almost on par with the immigrant percentage in Sweden. The fact that the party calls for controls on immigration does not necessarily make it against immigration. Supporting immigration reformed and keeping immigration in check is not neccessarily an anti-immigrant position. This would be similair to arguing that supporting protectionist trade policies means one is against the idea of multi-national trade.XenophobiaJimmie Akesson and the Sweden Democrats have never stated anything about fearing or not fearing foreigners, thus there is nothing to refute and only arguments claiming they are xenophobic to refute. I have addressed Pro's claims about Sweden Democrat policies that can be attributed to xenophobia, and have proved that the policies are not xenophobic by explaining how. Now on to Pro's arguments in his next round, he has stated that the slogan "Keep Sweden Swedish" is xenophobic. And while this statement is sometimes used by the Sweden Democrats, it is not necessarily xenophobic because it's only a statement to support cultural unity of Sweden and to reduce foreign influence. This does not always imply a fear or dislike of foreigners, but it can be attributed to wanting their own country to remain Swedish, but may not neccessarily dislike other cultures existing elsewhere. Furthermore, the Sweden Democrats have never wanted absolute assimilation of immigrants right before entering. But none the less, immigrants wanting to enter Sweden can still show some respect and knowledge of Swedish culture through visiting and research. My statements have not shown that the Sweden Democrats are xenophobic, but that they want cultural unity and assimilation of foreigners. This again does not imply that they dislike foreigners who may visit Sweden or have an interest in foreign culture(s) as long as they exist outside of Sweden. Furthermore, Pro claims that supporting swimming pools with gender segregation has nothing to do with Swedish culture. However, I have explained that it is proof of "Islamic invasion" and generally Islamic culture goes against classical Liberal ideas. And furthermore, pork does not have to be banned from a school menu just because of a small minority. Rather, other options can be offered.Due to a lack of time, I will end my arguments here and continue them in the next round.