Resolved: Planned Parenthood should be abolished in the US

On, contention 1 My first answer is planned parenthood is not the only way women can get care The warrant is my opponent claims that planned parenthood is the only way for women to get access to health services This is a ludicrous argument and a reason to vote the NEG down - They lie to you as the judge therefore women's healthcare will survive without planned parenthood My second answer is that planned parenthood hurts women's healthcare which turns contention 1 One reviewer said the clinic she visited was "all sorts of nasty." Another said Planned Parenthood had given her the wrong prescription. Another reviewer went in for an IUD, received five price quotes ranging from $200 to $785, and wasn"t told her appointment was only an "initial consultation" until she was hit with a hidden fee of $85. It gets worse. The Federalist recently published a young woman"s account of her experiences with Planned Parenthood. During one particular visit, Planned Parenthood employees bullied the young woman for not indicating she would consider abortion while she was waiting for the results of a pregnancy test, to the point where she left in tears. http://thefederalist.com... this means that planned parenthood not only steals but abuses its customers On contention 2 My first answer is black genocide We would not be increasing abortions but rather exposing the black genocide caused by planned parenthood. Planned Parenthood silences any opposition "No doubt the authors of the legislation think that anything that hurts Planned Parenthood, the leading provider of abortions, would further the pro-life cause. - This means that this argument is basically trying to silence the opposition by saying that we cannot argue for pro-life - that is abusive and an independent voter for the affirmative http://thefederalist.com... Planned parenthood was started to control black populations Planned Parenthood puts most of its clinics in black neighborhoods to "control the population" and that its founder, Margaret Sanger, "was not particularly enamored with black people." Planned Parenthood has been a target on the campaign trail after a series of sting videos was released alleging the organization illegally profits from selling aborted fetal tissue. The baby"s death is not executed in any gentle or humane way. Babies are crushed. Torn apart while alive. Cut into pieces in ways to save whole organs for sale and profit. Abortionists cannot use feticides such as digoxin to kill the baby first. That would make the salable (profitable) organs then unusable. That means the baby is crushed for organ retrieval while still alive. Read more at http://www.wnd.com... This means that they literally tear apart an infant while still ALIVE to steal their organs and are trying to wipe out black communities On Contention 3 First off, I do not have to prove how that court case is specifically wrong, I just have to prove that my case is right. First of all this not sufficient evidence because allowing planned parenthood sets a bad legal precedent on the contrary to what they claim They ignore the H.R.1997 - Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 or Laci and Conner's Law - Provides that persons who commit certain Federal violent crimes (conduct that violates specified provisions of the Federal criminal code, the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, or the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, or specified articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) ) and thereby cause the death of, or bodily injury to, a child who is in utero shall be guilty of a separate offense. Requires the punishment for that separate offense to be the same as provided under Federal law for that conduct had that injury or death occurred to the unborn child's mother (or in the case of a UCMJ violation, to be such punishment as a court-martial may direct, which shall be consistent with the punishments prescribed by the President for such conduct had that injury or death occurred to the unborn child's mother). Declares that such a separate offense does not require proof that: (1) the person who committed the offense knew or should have known that the victim of the underlying offense was pregnant; or (2) the defendant (or accused) intended to harm the unborn child. Prohibits imposition of the death penalty for such an offense. This is 2003-2004 meaning that that legal precedent is outdated and even if it is not they are violating a federal and the baby's first amendment rights On Contention 4 My first answer is turn- Planned parenthood makes the economy worse by adding a millions to the national debt In purely economic terms, the nation is $18 trillion in debt " why are we spending half a billion per year Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com... This is why you vote affirmative