I want to debate whether Jesus is the God of the Bible.

Well that's an unrelated response. This debate is not about Jehovah's witnesses. I quoted scripture from a variety of translations in order to get a more accurate understanding and sense of the proper context and meaning of each scripture. I don't care which translation you use because if you measure a scripture against other scripture to understand the overarching context and how it must harmonize with the rest of scripture you will know where there has been an error in translation. That's why the Bible is so great; you can always find the truth concerning scripture if you just dig deeper. I have even discussed the original Greek by using the Septuagint. And in doing so I have disproved your use of scripture and shown a more accurate understanding of scripture that harmonizes with the rest of the Bible. That being said, I have effectively refuted many many of your scriptures. You can't even refute one argument: The scriptures definitively say that NO ONE HAS SEEN GOD. Humans cannot look upon God and survive. Humans have seen Jesus therefore, JESUS IS NOT GOD. Otherwise the scriptures are lying and that is not possible. Solomon also explains the infinite nature of God and how NO construct can contain God. The human body is a construct. This helps us understand why Jesus can't be God. A HUMAN BODY CANNOT CONTAIN GOD. God cannot be quantified in such a manner so as to exist in human form; Solomon's description of God supports this. Its like trying to fill a glass with an infinite amount of water; the glass cannot contain all the water. The trinity doctrine dishonors God by attempting to limit him. Refute that, not the use of one of the many Bible translations I've quoted. This debate is not about Jehovah's Witnesses, so please check your hate (which is obvious since you wasted an entire round just to attack a religion) and focus on the debate subject at hand. It is in your best interest to understand what the Trinity really is because if you are wrong you may find that you are the one that is actually not Christian and may need to change, so please stay focused. If you want to debate the legitimacy of a particular religion, yours, mine, Jehovah's Witnesses, Catholics, or Islam, I'd gladly accept that challenge in a separate debate. I'm not trying to insult you, I would just like you to understand the gravity of this debate and stay on topic. Please and thank you. My second argument requires an understanding of God's qualities. God has limitless power and is the almighty; no one is as powerful as he is. You may try to argue that because he is all powerful he could do whatever wants like put himself into human form, but this is not true. To understand why we need to consider God's other qualities. God is described in scripture as having four principle qualities which are described in a vision of Ezekiel when he saw an angelic representative of God's that possessed four faces; a Bull, Lion, Eagle, and Mans. (Ezekiel 1:10) These four qualities are Power, Justice, Wisdom, and Love respectively. God possesses these qualities in infinite quantity, but none prevail over the other; they are in balance with each other. This is significant because it means God would never misuse his power in a way that would be unloving, unwise, or unjust. This also helps us understand the significance of another scripture 1 Corinthians 14:33. This shows us that God values order. Rules and regulations should be kept. It makes sense that God would act within the rules since that would be the course of wisdom in order to uphold a standard of Justice. Rules and regulations were also important in establishing the value of sin sacrifices and eventually the value of Jesus sacrifice. Let's discuss this; its' important to my argument. We know know that Jesus died for our sins, but ask yourself, "why did he have to die, how does his death pay for our sins?" Many Christians don't understand how it works and can't explain it. Can you, or anyone else reading this? I'll explain. God established the Mosaic law to help the Jews know what was right in wrong in God's eyes. If they violated the rules they had to suffer penalties. In paying these penalties they were helped to understand what was fair payment. In Leviticus 24:17 it says that if a person kills another person that the offender should be put to death as well. Jesus made reference to other parts of the law when he mentioned an eye for an eye. The point is this, justice dictates an EQUAL payment for an offense. If you kill someone you should die; this is fair. I'd like to ask, what is SIN and, according to the scriptures, what is the payment for SIN? The original Hebrew word translated to SIN literally means to "MISS, or FALL SHORT." That is to say that SIN is missing or falling short of God's standards, the law is an example of God's standards. And the payment for SIN is DEATH. (Romans 6:23) But it also held true for the Jews under the Mosaic law. Any violation of the many laws was a condemnation to death. It was almost impossible not to break any of the Mosaic laws so in effect the whole nation was condemned to SIN and DEATH. That's why God made the sacrifice provision. A life for a life. But is the life of an animal equal to the life of a man? No, that's why the sin offerings of sacrificed animals had to be repeated. They could never fully cover over the sins of people. Especially the original SIN that initially condemned us to death. When Adam was created he was given ONE law, don't eat from the tree of knowledge of good and bad. If he did what would the punishment be? He would die. (Gen. 2:17) Logic would dictate that if he never ate from that tree he would never die and be allowed to live forever eating from the Tree of Life that apparently also existed. Who knows how that works, but we know Adam sinned and the effect of falling short of God's standards was his banishment and death. Before Adam sinned he was considered perfect in God's eyes and worthy of everlasting life. But he willfully sinned against God and effectively condemned himself to a slow death. The perfect man, Adam, killed himself and in the process lost his perfection. If a perfect man kills a perfect man who can pay the price? Another perfect man, but there wasn't another one around. Romans 5:12 tells us that we all inherited SIN through Adam. We were all conceived after Adam's fall from perfection. None of us can pay the price of what Adam lost, its too high and we can't measure up. (psalm 47: 7,8) To illustrate, if someone killed your child and offered you the lives of a million rats as payment would it equivocally pay for the loss you feel? No, that is not justice. God established the Mosaic Law to provide a means to pay for sin, but there were was nothing EQUAL in value to life Adam lost. Until Jesus came to Earth. It's important to understand that the Law stipulates a corresponding payment for error. In the matter of lives lost an equal life had to paid. If you lost a goat you would paid with a goat. If I killed your sparrow you can't ask for my life as payment. I am greater than a sparrow. I am not going to overpay because that is not Justice. Jesus came to Earth to pay the price for what Adam lost. What was the price? ONE PERFECT HUMAN. Jesus had to be exactly what Adam was. Was Adam God? No, and the terms of payment for sin would stipulate that Jesus be equivalent to Adam. And the scriptures said he was exactly that the "Last Adam" (1 Corinthians 15:45) There was a reason Jesus was called that because he was a Perfect Man just as he needed to be. Jesus could not have been God because according to the rules of payment stipulated in the Law the price of Sin needed to be paid with an equal life not a greater life because that would not be TRUE JUSTICE. One of God's principle qualities is Justice he is not going to violate his own standards. Furthermore Jesus had to actually die to ransom us from Adam's Sin. Consider what this entails. In Ecclesiastes 9:5-10 the condition of the dead is described as complete inactivity; you simply cease to exist. There is no love, no hate, no wisdom, and no work. When you are dead you can't do anything. Adam isn't doing anything now; he no longer exists. Jesus had to become the same thing. DEAD; incapable of any thoughts or actions. Let me ask: Who had to present the value of the Sin sacrifice for it to actually have value? Who resurrected Jesus? According to law the High Priest had to present the sacrifice to God for it to have effect. Jesus was that High Priest that's why he is likened to Melchizedek because Jesus is both a King and a Priest just as Melchizedek was. God is not the priest. That's not how the law arrangement works in foreshadowing the role of Jesus. Furthermore Jesus can't be God because if God is dead then no one can resurrect him. Remember Jesus had to suffer the same condition of death that Adam did; the same conditioned described in Ecclesiastes. If God and Jesus are the same person then they are still dead and the Ransom was never paid because no one could present it or accept it. Some will argue that it was a kind of partial death or it was figurative. The problem with this excuse is that ADAM IS REALLY DEAD. A partial death or figurative death is not the same death as Adam's. That would mean that the payment for sin was not really paid and the condemnation of death stands. The Ransom Sacrifice of Jesus only works if Jesus is not God. To recap: The Trinity is not real because God is a God of ORDER and JUSTICE. The sacrifice of Jesus to pay for the Sin of Adam must follow the guidelines established by the Mosaic Law and be equal in value; a PERFECT MAN must die. The death must harmonize with Ecclesiastes. And because God was the person who resurrected Jesus since a dead person can't do it themselves. Please understand, the Ransom can't work with the Trinity.