In order to reduce unemployment and increase GDP, counterfieters should not be prosecuted

Thank you for that long post.counterfeiters(which I see to be misspelled in the debate title) Printed more then 5 dollars per print. They print MUCH more, as much as they want. Now if you could make your money at home smoking a cigar and printing money, would you work? Unemployment would go up, and with all that money Another reason for this occurrence is contract obligations. Contracts can require a person to receive a fixed salary or receive a good or service at a fixed price. Often these contracts do not take into account changes in deflation or inflation.If it is about money, dont take those jobsThird reason for this occurrence is oligopoly competition (a few producers, let's say they produce similar but slightly different material). Firms will not raise there prices above Po, since a small increase in prices will cause consumers to flow to the other businesses. However, firms will not lower prices below Po, since other producers will respond the same way. This creates stickiness, since a company will only increase prices if expenses are really high or if expenses are really low.I dont think this has anything to do with some printing off money. Final reason is due to "menu costs". Basically businesses will be reluctant to change prices since it will actually cost them to change the price level. They will have to change their advertisement fliers, the cost of a menu, and accountant costs. The result is that since it costs money for a business to change its prices, it will be more affordable for the business to keep prices the same.I'm not getting why this is important As stated earlier, prices are sticky. Therefore an increase in the money supply will not cause a proportional increase in the price index (Ex: doubling the money supply will not double prices).No. If Everyone gets more money why would you keep prices low? This is a Capitalistic society. This means that through increasing the money supply, one can actually increase the Gross Domestic Production. I have now fullfilled my first burden, to show that an increase in the money supply will cause an increase in gross domestic production.GDP only counts for the "official" sum of all money made in the country for one year.- it does not take into account the 'black economy', which makes up 5-10% of the real GDP in countries like the UK or USA, up to 30% in Italy, and as much as 50% in Russia. This means that at equal "official" GDP per capita, Italy and the UK do not in fact have the same average income - it is maybe 15-20% higher in Italy, as fewer people declare the totality of their income. it does not take into account the accumulated wealth and assets, such as savings, investments (bonds, shares...), real estate properties and other material possessions. The GDP per capita would be a good way to compare citizens' wealth is all people were forced to spend all their income on perishable or consumable goods like food or clothes, and be left with no cash, no house and no other investment or long-term material goods (e.g. furniture, TV...) at the end of each year. Therefore A persons wealth does not count ALL of a person's riches. http://www.eupedia.com...