BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
obama is an awful president.

1.)You could do it in 8 years if you act like Mick Jagger and get crafty. There is no better way to get money then to steal it from us citizens, which is what he"s been doing, and spend it all on his vacations. 2.)If I had the option to help this country at a position his level, I would start off by not destroying the constitution and not being a d***. His actions have represented him being a communist and he looks like a Muslim so he is obviously a Muslim. 3.)It"s part of the constitution or declaration of independence, I don"t know which one, that you have to be born in America to be president. 4.)He has tried to take away rights, starting with gun control. I will not let this dictator take away anyone who is a law abiding citizen to lose their weapons. Obamacare is forcing people to pay for abortions which is morally wrong. I will not pay for a woman to kill a kid out of convience. (2) 1.)Gave everybody? Does that include the illegal immigrants who are taking our peoples jobs? 2.)Homosexuality is wrong in many views. I could start on about that but that would be another debate. 3.)That would happen anyways no matter who was president (Obama or Romney). It was also only a matter of time before they came back. It has also taken longer then it could have been also. 4.)He doesn"t give two shi** for this country. He is destroying it as he pleases and people are completely blind to it. I will start another debate about this later.
obama is an awful president.

OK My response 1. He may not fixed the economy but let me ask you this how long does it take to pull put a country of debt not 8 years for sure. 2. How do you know he's Muslim? Prove how he is a communist either? He is doing the best he can what have you done to help this county? That goes for everyone 3. So what if he wasn't born in the U.S is he a citizen yes so back off America was built off of foreign countries 4. He has not taken away a SINGLE right from the U.S. people. Good President 1.Gave everybody the right to have health care 2. Has fought for gays that shows he cares for EVERYONE unlike some people (not meaning you) 3. He pulled troops out of Iraqi that had been there for a LONG time. 4. Flat out he cares for this country That is why
War Scenario: Saudi Arabia (Pro) v. Iran (Con)

TIMELINE:Operation Mother RussiaMay 9th, 2015: Russia and OPEC forces take over about 3/4 of Saudi Arabia.May 10th, 2015: A attack involving 6 million combined troops, 9,000 AFVs, 7,000 tanks, and 7,000 aircraft invade the area of Riyadh.1:42 AM: Blackouts happen in Riyadh. 1:44 AM: Riyadh is invaded by two armies containing over 3 million troops, 4,500 AFVs, 3,500 tanks, and 3,500 aircraft. One from the west and east.2:14 AM: Saudi Arabia troops are confused and overwhelmed, most surrender. (Without Pro's leadership) 5:17 AM: Riyadh is captured by Russian/OPEC forces, they hold out there.7:18 AM: Saudi Arabia's government starts to go into Anarchy. 7:44 AM: OPEC/Russian reinforcements of about 1 million arrive to Riyadh.May 11th, 2015: China does not supply major companies like Apple and Microsoft in the USA until they back out.May 12th, 2015: The value of the dollar is lowering rapidly, and the economy is being choked in the USA.May 13th, 2015: Plans to split Saudi Arabia between OPEC countries has started.May 16th, 2015: Russian President Gabe1e announces the Saudi Arabia is fully under Russia's control. May 18th, 2015: Apple and Microsoft sales decrease by 60%.May 19th, 2015: USA's economy is so bad, morale lowers.May 20th, 2015: USA has no choice but to get out of the war. They end relations. (unless Pro has another thing)I basically won.
War Scenario: Saudi Arabia (Pro) v. Iran (Con)

This round is exclusively for acceptance and establishing rules. Rules: 1. Realism does not have to be perfect, but at all times when the proper information is available based on the country you are using it should be taken in to account, this includes alliances, the political landscape of the country and their form of government, military strength and capabilities, intelligence, scientific research and development, culture. finances, morale and everything else. 2. Each turn is 2-4 months in length, you can only makes moves that can realistically be made in that time window 3. Nuclear weapons are allowed, although neither saudi arabia nor iran have nuclear capabilities at the moment 4. You must state all your battle plans 5.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument For God's Existence Is Sound

Premise 1: Whatever Begins To Exist Has A CausePremise one supports suficiant causation. Since Klara Hitler brought about Adolf Hitler. Not neccacry causation. Like if I had diherria from mexican food that mexican food is a sufficant cause of me sh1tting my pants. Premise one proves both.About the quantum mechanics. Theres debate if subatomic particles even exist. But quantum mechanics is complex and has many interpretaions, so our interpreation may be false. Sub atoms being uncaused really only work with interprations like the copehhagenPremise 2:Something cant start without a first member because it would have a regress.B theoryYou know what the b in b- theory stands for? Bullsh1t. No really. THe problem with b theory is it sucks. Bullsh1it theory says time is tenseless and time exists like space. The past, present, and future all exist equally. This means we can go back in time but if we go back in time then we can kill our dads before we were born. The b theory entails contradictions. If relativity supports a b theory than it must be that our interpration of it is wrong this doesn't mean neo lorenz is true but we may have some other or are missing something. Relativity mainly proves the growing block theory not the B theory. It says light travels finitely this means an event must have already passed for us to see it. Con has to prove that relativity ties in with the future.KCA is a win.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument For God's Existence Is Sound

The Kalam Cosmological arument is a very good argument yes. 1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause. 2. The universe began to exist. 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause. 4. If the universe has a cause, there exists an uncaused, personal Creator of the universe who sans the universe is beginningless, immaterial, timeless, spaceless, changeless, and enormously powerful. 5. Therefore, there exists an uncaused, personal Creator of the universe who sans the universe is beginningless, immaterial, timeless, spaceless, changeless, and enormously powerful. (1) This is self-evident a priori. Everything we see has a cause. Diaherra, football, pain, hitler, but we don't see stuff like food, root beer, robots, chickens, hitler come out of no where with no cause. Everyone hopes 1 is true. Otherwise we could start eating a sandwitch and posion can just appear. Atheists hope the premise isn't true, but they all want it to be true unknowingly. Its a fundamental law of natural science, namely, that matter can neither be created or destroyed. That is natural law.(2) Theres good reasons for to believe this. Like this sub argument2.11 An actual infinite cannot exist. 2.12 An infinite temporal regress is an actual infinite. 2.13 Therefore, an infinite temporal regress of events cannot exist.If I told you that you can get a candy bar if you snap your fingers an infinite amount of time would you ever get the candy? Nope! Same with before the univers.The available scientific evidence strongly suggests the universe has a finite past.*The 2003 paper by Borde, Guth, and Vilenkin suggests a universe with a finitepast. *An actual infinity can't exist, for it would lead to absurdities such as Hilbert's Hotel(3) Follows from above(4) There was no nature and there were no natural forces ontologically prior to the Big Bang nature itself was created at the Big Bang. That means the cause of the universe must be something beyond nature"something we would call supernatural. It also means that the supernatural cause of the universe must at least be: *spaceless because it created space *timeless because it created time *immaterial because it created matter *powerful because it created out of nothing *intelligent because the creation event and the universe was precisely designed *personal because it made a choice to convert a state of nothing into something (impersonal forces dont make choices) and how can an impersonal cause give rise to a temporal effect? (5) God exists. Follows
Global Capitalistic Institutions

"The reason they have power at the expense of our liberty is because we give them the power." No, that is the reason they have power. The fact that we give them power does not imply that it is at the expense of our liberty. "As my opponent stated, there is an extent to what an individual can do. Individuals can only gather power by others letting them get away with something." Completely false. "Letting" someone "get away" with something may or may not give them power. Furthermore, "letting" someone do something may or may not be a factor. That individual may have the ability to do what they wish regardless of the actions of others. There are other ways to gain power: money, physical ability, and simply convincing someone that one's action is correct. "The only reason the U.S. government has the POWER to send us to war is because we have said that if the decide this, we will accept it. Thus we have GIVEN power to the U.S. and taken away our liberty to decide whether or not we ( as individuals) go to war." First, the government does not have the power to send "us" to war. They have the power to send our military to war. Members of our military are volunteers. It is their job to go to war. Second, Congress decides whether or not to formally declare war. The members of Congress are elected by the citizens to represent them. By extension, it is the citizens that actually decide whether or not to go to war. "It should be considered a bad thing. This inherently takes away our liberties." Again, you have yet to prove why this is a bad thing. "If any individual is trying to hurt someone, then all the other individuals are there to correct the situation." No, the government via the police are there to correct the situation. "My opponent asks what proof I have of the centalized governing system of the capitalist entity having complete liberty. As I have proved, they have power at the extent of our liberties." From what I see, you have proved nothing. "What other considerations?" Refer to my second response. "If that same individual protests the entity, then that entity is going to use any and everything in it's Power (that we gave them) to quell the protest." Not necessarily. Our government allows protests all the time.
Global Capitalistic Institutions

Flow across my capitlist entity=centalized power argument: opponent conceeds Opponent argues the following on my second point: "1. This is an unwarranted, blanket statement. What proof do you have? 2. If we assume this statement to be true, why should it considered to be a bad thing? To have any form of effective government, some measure of liberty must be taken from the masses. Otherwise, any person is free to do whatever he wishes (and is able) to do, regardless of the effect it has on other people, without consequences." The reason they have power at the expense of our liberty is because we give them the power. As my opponent stated, there is an extent to what an individual can do. Individuals can only gather power by others letting them get away with something. The only reason the U.S. government has the POWER to send us to war is because we have said that if the decide this, we will accept it. Thus we have GIVEN power to the U.S. and taken away our liberty to decide whether or not we ( as individuals) go to war. Following this logic, the centalized entities have power because we conceeded and said, you can have certain liberties of ours. It should be considered a bad thing. This inherently takes away our liberties. And while there might be less consequences they still exist. If any individual is trying to hurt someone, then all the other individuals are there to correct the situation. They might get away with one or two things but for the most part the society will combat any significant problems. My opponent asks what proof I have of the centalized governing system of the capitalist entity having complete liberty. As I have proved, they have power at the extent of our liberties. So, we have lost liberties while the centalized capitalistic entity has all of their physical rights plus, any and all actions interacting with us that we have accepted they can do. My argument:"The masses can do anything they want unless the centralized power precieves it as wrong, immoral or a threat. My opponent's response: "Very untrue. There are many other considerations when it comes to what one can and cannot do, wanting being what one of them. Furthermore, "the masses" rarely to anything. For the most part, it is individuals that do things." What other considerations? The masses does not have to apply to every one as a whole, in this case it is represenative of any one excluded from the governing body of the centalized power. The centalized power will allow anything htat supports them. If an individaul advertises for the entity, the entity is not going to do any thing. If that same individual protests the entity, then that entity is going to use any and everything in it's Power (that we gave them) to quell the protest.
Global Capitalistic Institutions

"Any global capitalist entity, ranging from Wal-Mart to Shell, is a form of centralized power." True enough. They indeed possess power, and they are centralized. "Any form of centralized power, ranging from a global capitalist entity to a national government, takes liberty away from the masses." I have two responses to this statement: 1. This is an unwarranted, blanket statement. What proof do you have? 2. If we assume this statement to be true, why should it considered to be a bad thing? To have any form of effective government, some measure of liberty must be taken from the masses. Otherwise, any person is free to do whatever he wishes (and is able) to do, regardless of the effect it has on other people, without consequences. "Only the governing body of the centralized power has total liberty." Again, what is your proof for this statement? "The masses can do anything they want unless the centralized power precieves it as wrong, immoral or a threat." Very untrue. There are many other considerations when it comes to what one can and cannot do, wanting being what one of them. Furthermore, "the masses" rarely to anything. For the most part, it is individuals that do things.
(pi)r^2 is not a perfectly correct formula for the area of a circle

I'm too lazy to use symbols in a non-serious debate that is based on someone who thinks a formula is wrong because it has infinite variations based on all circle shapes and sizes. Which is to say that the formula is for all circles, not just one, therefore the formula is not wrong - you're failing to understand the multiple implications of this formula in how it is used for any circle; for it to be wrong, you'd have to prove that your decimal point theory also involves no circles. If it involves a circle, no matter how many decimal points you add to it to create its circumference, the formula is built to solve it via its circumference - the formula cannot be used if it has no circumference, which is to conclude that your silly debate has thus proven your very real stupidity.
(pi)r^2 is not a perfectly correct formula for the area of a circle

My opponent thinks I meant pie. No, I meant pi. (That sounds stupid if you say it out loud) The reason the formula is incorrect is because pi is endless. Let's say our circle has a radius of 3. If so, then I can mutliply: (3.14)(3)^2, right? Okay, that gives me an area of 28.26. What if I add another decimal to pi, making it 3.141? (3.141)(3)^2=28.269. In this way, I can keep adding decimals which will keep increasing the area, making the area "endless" (according to the formula). Conclusion: The formula cannot be correct because pi is endless, making the area of the circle endless. (You can keep adding decimals for ever and keep infinitely increasing the area of a circle, which is not valid because the area of a circle is finite.)
Rap Battle

And here I thought we were rolling in a patch of daisies, If you really want to go and die and meet Hades, I'd think that even simple scum like you could take it, A sliver of hope to finally mark your deadly fate, What makes you think that I gave up? Ever? Coz' we all know that I was winning to the last letter, I was offering you a kind of truce, Or a last salute, To a petty dispute, I was asking you to not be consumed by your rage and surrender the stage, To the words on the page, I gave you my respect, But only if you changed, And didn't continue with this stupid charade, Name one good rap that used the smae lines twice, A stupid one at that, Well, Why am I surprised? Your logic is flawed, You need to be dismembered, A true and simple message from a bored contender
Rap Battle

Wow, I guess you crumbled from the weight that my heavy rhymes weigh Did you really just compliment me in a diss? Guess you really do represent MGK Right now I am half asleep so I'll just finish you off with simple bars Don't shoot for the moon because you wouldn't even make it among the stars Darn, It seems you gave up before I could start multisyllable rhyming It would of sped the process of you being dead, So you have really good wimp out timing You know, I'm glad you didn't get me to start It would of not only tore me, But also tore my own rhymes apart Oh well, I guess i'll leave it at that If this was tic tac toe, You don't even have a scratch You're a dog, And I sent you to the pound I bet you can't, But maybe you can make a comeback in this last round
Rap Battle

I don't really care if you call me it, Looks like your meter's still a piece of sh*t Rhymes that make you die do the world a service Everybody knows that you got no purpose, But for now can we tone it down, 'cause this battle's at an end And it's over now, You want respect then I will give you my support, If you don't really want it then continue this retort, But I don't really wanna fight anymore, So put an end to the war, And we'll settle the score, I think for now I'd like to say congratulations, And also criticize my frequent hesitations, Don't rap rhymes that tear yourself apart, Then you're back at the start, Even if you're smart, I'll give you credit for the rhymes you've spun, But in my little world, Well, You would not have won, And consequentially I say to each his own, So I'll change my tone, Throw myself a bone, This little universe is not one you've created, It's where great lyricists have stood there and debated, They're never sated, Always spewing hate, And they can never abate, Until they hesitate, Wait! Haven't I made a contradiction, But all of that is just my natural confliction, Let's try to end it on a mellow note, And please, For Christ's sake, Just let the readers vote
Rap Battle

You know what? I don't really care if your a boy or a girl. You're probably just an it It's about time I go for the jugular, And cause a throat slit I don't call myself a hero, I am actually a villain Because of all these evil acts I'm committing from these rhymes I keep killin You don't like my disjointed rapping huh? Well isn't that a disgrace? Here, Let snap my fingers back into place You're right I don't have a brain, I didn't think you knew? Funny thing is I don't need one to beat you Your rhyme zone? It's all part of my universe I am in control here, And I'm about to make it worse You claim my logic is mundane But my non existent mind can come up with more than anything you could come up with in your existent brain Don't worry I won't try and fix me, I wouldn't even know where to start Because my lyrics are so deadly they have even caused me to fall apart You think you passed the finish line? It looks to me like your back at the start Remember I am in control of this universe, You know, For someone who has a brain you're not very smart Did you really complain about how my lines don't even rhyme? When within the same line you just rhymed rhyme with time? Oh and true I am sitting here sad, Because I thought I would have to use some effort But I guess I am going to have dig you back up out of the dirt I will admit I am pretty ugly though, I will atleast give you that But not nearly as ugly as your rap
Rap Battle

Do you really want me to blow you to ground zero? You think by not swearing you can call yourself a hero, Well tell you what, I can do that too, Just one of many reasons that I'm better than you, Your words are child's play, Prepare to get your mind blown, You had none anyway, So come into my rhyme zone, Your logic is mundane, A metaphor for keys and doors? You're fighting with yourself, A couple tiny, Pointless, Wars, Don't dare to try and fix you, 'cause you've already fallen apart, In the case of your disjointed rapping, I'd have no idea where to start, Don't bother catching up, I've already passed the finish line, Your silly whining isn't good enough to waste my time. You call them rhymes, But your lines don't even rhyme, Your meter's off about half of the time You're sitting there, Sad, Ugly face turning plum, I'm chilling with my doggo and popping bubble gum
Rap Battle

You think you can rhyme better than me? Lets just see how much you can take I'm about to drop a heavy load of rhymes on you so hard, It will pound you into the ground and cause an earthquake You claim your better than me? For goodness sake I'm about to make you fall so I better get a rake Because it's about that season, So I better clean up before I leaves "He really thinks he can win? " oh please, How can he unlock the lock if I am the one holding the keys? Because to beat me you have to get past the first door Me on the other hand well. . . . I have already busted down my first four Have these puns gone over your head? Or am I just not making sense? It doesn't matter, Ether way your just to dense, Or I'm to immense I'm about to take my lyrical hammer and this rap battle and nail it I'm going to be Eminem, While MGK is who you represent I don't need to swear to beat you, And I certainly don't need that kind of sentence enhancer You need them though, You don't have that talent and without them your raps would be a disaster
Rap Battle

Sharpen your slang, You know nothing, I see your cheap threats and I know that you're bluffing, Typos? Will get you nowhere, Your crybaby mouth is too scared to swear, I'm not here to start throwing sh*t, So act like a monkey and I can just quit, Already know that I'm better than you, I don't really need to see this through, Give up, If you haven't already, There's fear in your heart and it's still going steady, Steady for you means easy for me so plead your plea, No need to get heady, Ready? For the words I unleash There's no need to tell you to beware the beast Your meter is off, Your grammar's a shame, I'm three squares ahead and I'm winning the game This battle's too easy a task So wave your white flag and throw off your mask So don't tell me you're holding back, Just a clever ruse for a weak attack
Rap Battle

Alright, This is round 1 and I'll keep it simple Better watch out so you don't get popped like a pimple So for the moment I will just apply the acne cream So that way I don't lyrically destroy you this round, And maybe by next round you can be redeemed In other words I'm saying I have no confidence in your rhyming abilities, Or anything you have to say So I am putting my best efforts on delay It's funny you even accepted this debate You said you couldn't join the other one, You probably should of just accepted fate But now that you are here, I get the pleasure of mentle subvert If you get me to hyped I will bury you 12 feet, Not just 6 feet in the dirt This is all I am typing now, So I hope your prepared I am only going to lyrically demolish you, So please don't be scared