I Am Better Than You -Provideoman123

I will present why my opponent is wrong, and is not the best or better than me. I will quote my opponents arguments in italic's and then I will rebut with the original. "Hello to all, I am known as provideoman123, Master Debater. "You are 0 win 7 lose. No one has actual evidence you are a good debater, ony evidence that you are a bad one. "I am always cordial and respectful. "No you are not. . http://www.debate.org... you wrote there, you said this. "You are incorrect with your assumption that water can be infinite. I am actually so astounded that one can be that stupid. I am obviously superior to you in all aspects. I am incredibly smart and can see right through your argument. Your argument actually personally offends my superior intelligence. You thought you could compete with the big players here (me) with this ridiculous argument. "Now, this is very rude, you say stupid, ricdiculous and you even lost your conduct point, meaning that you are not always respectful. "I am a professional debater who is well respected on this site. "Now are you a professional debater? You have no evidence of being a good one only that you are 0 win 7 lose. Also are you well respected? I have over 270 friends in debate. org when you have 2, 1 no longer active, and the other not online for 5 whole days. "I have a superior intelligence and I am a proven expert in many fields due to my high intelligence and extensive knowledge. My opinions are always factual and correct. So voters, you know who is the strongest(me). I assure you, I am always cordial and respectful, especially to my fellow debaters. It is them who are wrong. "How do we know if you have good intelligence. All us DDO members know that you are 0 win 7 lose, not very intelligent. You did not prove the following claims in italics. How do we know if your opinions are always correct? Even though if they are correct, does that mean you are better than me or anyone? Reasons why I am better than you:"-I am ALWAYS cordial and respectful"Then why did you lose conduct? "- People who forfeit debates are weak pathetic children who cannot even back up their own claims with facts and proof like I do. ^^ - Excluding me because mysuperior intelligence is infallibleand never weak. I am betterthan you simply because of mysuperior brain that is neverwrong. "You always forfeited debates like this: . http://www.debate.org...In that debate you even said you were wrong, you were not the best person in the world, so this gets rebutted. "-I am better than you. That is just a fact you low-lifes just have to accept. You weak minded idiots can't keep up with my powerful intellect even if you tried. "Intellect is not even a word, proving you are not smart or intelligent. Also you have no scientfic evidence. You did not even show why you are better"-If you disagree with me, you are wrong. If you agree with me, you are partly right but you will never be fully right because it takes a brain of my caliber (which is unmatched in the world because I am the best) to even comprehend the inner workings of my arguments. "Why am I wrong? I showed sources and proof why you are wrong, when you showed no evidence. "-I am humble and show self restraint. My fellow debaters love engaging in a friendly discussion with me because I am so open minded and nice. If you understand that I have good intentions, you may be not as stupid as I automatically assume everyone else except for me is. "You are not nice, do not have friendly discussions, you say stuupid, people are to dumb, and you always forfeit. "- Pro scientists around the world have proven me to be the smartest man on earth so do not try to disprove these "smart" men(obviously they are not as smart as me but they are smart enough to recognize me as the smartest) because I have scientific proof. "How do we know you are telling the truth? We don't know who you are, and we do not have evidence or you did not show me. "- I am always cordial and respectful"As I said, you say dumb and lose conduct, which does not make you always respectful. "Rules to this debate:Round 1: Cordial greetings and I will provide you time to read my argument. Round 2: Discussion and you can present your weak claimsRound 3: Discussion where I smash your weak claimsRound 4: Friendly conclusion and reflection"This is weird. I had smashed my opponent's argments. And he cannot smash mine. Don't care of this. "Voters, you know who is the winner. Please do not be corrupt and deny me the victory I deserve, just like every single other debate I have participated in. Please be cordial and respectful as I will be throughout this entire debate. "You never one the debate, and this debate, you will do the same.