I will not contradict myself.

I will like to start by stating that my opponent did not address all contradictions mentioned in the previous round, rather he only attacked one of these contradictions. My opponent stated that my accusation made in the previous round was obnoxious. His only base to this argument was that he had no answer to the question and thus could not properly answer the question. However, while this explanation was provided in the previous round in which he answered "I'm not sure, so neither answer is appropriate." Now unless the definition of explanation has changed during the ;last 24 hours, simply saying "i'm not sure" hardly accounts for an explanation. A proper explanation would be for example "Neither answer would be correct as I am not sure what you are asking and thus unable to properly answer the question. Please restate your question and I might be able to answer." I apologize for the typo in my 3rd question. My opponent claims that I broke the rules is absolutely flawed. The fact is that the question "Is the next word you're going to say no?" was not referred to the debate, but real life. If this question was meant to be about this debate, the word "say" will not be a say, but a type. This question was directed at my opponent and his verbal answers to any question asked verbally. Contradiction My opponent contradicts himself by answering the second question in my second first round with a yes. The question "Are you a female" was then asked In my second round in which he answered with a "no." Why is this a contradiction? Many researches have shown and proven that men are actually modified female. Brian Sykes further elaborates on this topic in my evidence -----http://abcnews.go.com... --- With this said, we can clearly see that in some ways, men are actually females. To test this, I welcome you to raise your shirt and ask yourself why you have nipples. Another contradiction made by my opponent is when he answered to the question..."do you have a girlfriend" in which he answered with a "No, I am not in a relationship with a woman." My opponent was latter asked, do you have a "Do you have a friend who is a girl?" In which he answered with a "Yes, I have a friend who is a girl." Now, before I begin my explanation as to why this two answers contradict each other, lets look at the definition of relationship. Relationship: a connection, association, or involvement.-- http://dictionary.reference.com... -- With this said, we can clearly see that a friendship is a relationship. Saying that you are not in a relationship with a woman, and then stating that you are in a friendship {relationship} with a woman is contradictory. On one part you are saying that you are not involved in a relationship with a woman and on the other part, your saying that you are involved in a relationship with a woman. The final contradiction made in my opponent's last round ones again, deals with the question "do you have a girlfriend?" Which he answered with a no. I later asked him the question "do you have friends?' In which he answered yes, and finally "do you have a boy friend?" In which he answered "No, I am not in a relationship with a boy." Like stated earlier, a relationship is a connection or involvement so stating that you don't have a girl friend { a friend who is a girl} and saying that you don't have a boy friend {a friend who is a boy} is completely contradictory to saying that you have friends. As there are two genders on earth, my opponent cannot say that he has a friend of a different species (other animals) simply because they are either a boy, or a girl. Questions: 1. Do you like a woman's body? 2. Do you like a man's body? 3. Are you perfect? 4. Do you hate yourself (both personality wise and physically) 5. Do you love a man's body? 6. Do you Love yourself? 7. Do you like all of humanity? 8. Do you believe in God? 9. Do you believe in God's teachings? 10. Are you a TRUE Christian? Thank you :D