Evidence against the Big Bang

I. CMBR Data A. The Horizon Problem In your attempt to answer the objections to Inflation theory, you have committed the grave error of circular logic. The inflation hypothesis was created to explain the horizon problem [1]. To claim that uniformity is a verified prediction of the inflationary hypothesis is thus circular reasoning. [2] The same problem plagues the second prediction. Is there any inflationary hypothesis prediction that is not circular? No. B. Untenable assumptions and bad data. My apologies. The source is actually 2 from R2. As I said above, It was assumed that the foreground contamination is frequency dependent, while the anisotropy is independent of frequency. This is untestable. The same source also shows that WMAP data fails radiological standards. C. CMBR data can be explained as due to local radiation My apologies for the ambiguity. I will cite the study again. [3] This time, I will quote from the study directly, possibly they will be more articulate. "The WMAP Q, V, and W band radial profiles of temperature deviation of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) were constructed for a sample of 31 randomly selected nearby clusters of galaxies. .. The profiles were compared in detail with the expected CMB Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (SZE) caused by these clusters, with the hot gas properties of each cluster inferred observationally by applying gas temperatures as measured by ASCA to isothermal $\beta$ models of the ROSAT X-ray surface brightness profiles, and with the WMAP point spread function fully taken into consideration. After co-adding the 31 cluster field, it appears that WMAP detected the SZE in all three bands. Quantitatively, however, the observed SZE only accounts for about 1/4 of the expected decrement. The discrepancy represents too much unexplained extra flux: in the W band, the detected SZE corresponds on average to 5.6 times less X-ray gas mass within a 10 arcmin radius than the mass value given by the ROSAT $\beta$ model. We examined critically how the X-ray prediction of the SZE may depend on our uncertainties in the density and temperature of the hot intracluster plasma, and emission by cluster radio sources. Although our comparison between the detected and expected SZE levels is subject to a margin of error, the fact remains that the average observed SZE depth and profile are consistent with those of the primary CMB anisotropy, i. e. in principle the average WMAP temperature decrement among the 31 rich clusters is too shallow to accommodate any extra effect like the SZE. " From this we see that it is an either or situation. Either it is totally CMBR, or totally SZE. Therefore, CMBR data can be explained wholly by SZE or there is no SZE. We know however, that there is always SZE, so it logically must II. Time Dilation in Quasars The explanation given is no explanation at all. You have just explained time dilation in general. The point of my argument remains unaddressed. As such, I will not repeat myself, and I request you to go back to my opening round and address this argument. II. Redshifts in Quasars You have just refuted the idea of tired light. That is not my argument. My argument is that quasars have physical interactions with lower redshifted galaxies. This has been observationally verified (See the previous round). Thus, redshifts cannot be due to distance. If it is not due to distance, then what is it due to? I cannot refute you other points as I have restricted myself. 1. . http://prd.aps.org... 2. I will like to add a caveat to the rules. If rule 1 is broken, there is no need to concede. (Should you agree) The change does not apply to other rules. 3. . http://arxiv.org...