The U.S. should improve Sino-American relations by exchanging capital cities with China

Bond by the nuclear treaties, signed by most of the world, that included the People's Republic of China and the United States of America( . http://en.wikipedia.org...... ) . If US declare war on China, China would take the DC and US would take Beijing, this not just have no improvement on our security, but can also give the Chinese an opportunity to create massive damage for our country. " --> 1) The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty does not prohibit the use of Nuclear weapons. Rather, it simply asserts the use of M. A. D on any nation who uses Nuclear Weapons. 2) The exchange of capitals increases the damage of M. A. D. If the U. S. A cares about it's capital, it won't declare war on China, and vica versa. 2) NATIONAL SECURITY "Put it this way, you invited this guy, whom you had chosen to have a friendship relationship with, now your house is a mansion, a great building, colossal, sparkling with wealth, and let's say your the one you invited is a hobo. You wanted him to have your home, and you'll live in his home. What do you think the result would be? How many materials would you think there gonna left? Are there anything you could take? None. Aforesaid, I don't think this won't improve our security, but rather give us a parasite in our own body. " --> Bad analogy. China isn't a Hobo. It has the worlds third largest economy (. http://en.wikipedia.org...) and the World's largest military (. http://en.wikipedia.org...). 3) ECONOMIC TIES "Japan-USA have such a strong economic tie ( . http://www.carnegieendowment.org...... ), according to . http://www.worldsrichestcountries.com......, Japan is the richest country in Asia and also the second richest country in the world, let's just say we'll exchange our capital for economic tie, Japan would be a functional choice rather than China. " --> According to your source here (. http://www.worldsrichestcountries.com...), there gap between Japan and China is closing. China was up 30%, whereas Japan was up just over 12%. At the current rate, China will more than likely catch up and exceed Japan. You also cite the Japanese-American ties. Although this is very beneficial for the U. S. A. , it shows that U. S. -Japanese relations are strong enough, and the U. S. needs to improve relations with other nations. Japanese military figures are at about 238,000 (. http://en.wikipedia.org...), and this is just a self-defence force, meaning Japan cannot give significant military aid to the U. S. . China on the other hand has 2,250,000, (. http://en.wikipedia.org...), which is far more useful to the U. S. 4) ===CULTURAL EXCHANGE=== "We appreciate and respect the Chinese culture, which had enriched our country with Chinese food, China Town and a lot more traditions from the Chinese, but that's not the reason why we should trade our nation for China, by doing that, it won't be Cultural Exchange anymoew but rather than the American will be acculturated by the Chinese and so forth. " --> Firstly, there are huge misconceptions about what Chinese food really is (. http://www.positiveliberty.com...) (. http://www.marginalrevolution.com...) Moreover, areas of a city designated as China town can make dividing liens between "Real Americans" and "Immigrants". Exchanging capital cities would show a sign of goodwill between the U. S. A. and China. It is not however exchanging capitals. "Base on the U. S Code TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 2B > ï¿½ 78dd–1" --> I fail to see how this piece of U. S. law prohibits America exchanging a city and moving it's government offices to Beijing. If America went out today and invaded China, and progressed to the gates of Beijing, the Chinese premier could say "Ok, we surrender and forfeit Beijing to you". It would be like doing this, accept at the same time America secedes Washington D. C. to China, in an act of pure goodwill. I await my opponent response.