Can Anarcho-Capitalism work

The opponent states that "corporations" do not exist. Simply not true.A corporation is a: company or group of people authorized to act as a single entityPerhaps I should call them agencies or companies, because these companies and agencies earn their living from enforcing law and order; this is the core of anarcho-capitalism, and this makes it distinctive from other forms of anarchy. Nevertheless, I would now move onto my rebuttals.1. RulesThe Opponent states that there are certain "rules" in place to keep law and order. However, agencies may disagree on these rules; an agency might call drug smuggling a "crime", while another agency might not, therefore leading to confusion about what to do. An agency might also be obliged to benefit the ones which are willing to pay more, or those that are richer, instead of those who are poorer. Also, there would be a disagreement on when it is ever correct to kill. For example, Person x of company y kills person a because of fraud. Without any authority or written law in place, or any trials organized, the punishment for each crime would differ throughout agencies, and this may cause a rift in the population. Therefore, with a muddy vision of these "rules", we are unable to define any rules. In comparison with a government-based society, where laws are decided and imposed, Anarcho-Capitalism is based on proxy laws.2. Greed is Human NatureAlthough Anarcho-Capitalism defends private property, it totally ignores the fact that greed is human nature. We have the desire for everything to be self-centered on us; in a survey by James Patterson, survey participants were asked "what they would do for $100 million". 25% of them would have abandoned their entire family, 3% would've put up their kids for adoption, and 16% would give up their American citizenship. What does this say? This shows that greed is human nature, and we want more than others. What does this mean? For example, if company x gets y dollars per day, company z would want to get 2y dollars or more per day, and would do anything to do this. Taking this model, we apply it into Anarcho-Capitalism. If company x has y laborers, company y would attempt to have 2y laborers, or make company x have 0.5y laborers; yes, that means they would kill the employees of the other companies. Anarcho-Capitalism is a Governmentless Version of the Free Market; initially a bad idea, and always a bad idea. I would also like to add that big companies could completely smaller companies by violent means, and they have done this, or by buying smaller companies.3. ExploitationThe opponent starts talking about my Marxian Analysis of the Capitalist Mode of Production; this has always been the case. If a worker produces x value of capital, his boss would want at least 2x of the capital back, but he can't sell his capital for a high price, so he has to reduce the wages of his worker. Especially when there are no tarriffs to protect a certain product's price from dwindling down, the "boss" would have to exploit his workers even more. Although the opponent says that "bosses want to exploit workers, but they can't", workers are skilled in only one labor, and should be kept in that labor. However, if the price of that product decreases, then the skilled laborer, who is skilled in his proffession, would be completely exploited and would have no choice because his entire industry provides low paying jobs. Under Anarcho-Capitalism, a reign of corporate terror would rule the people who advocated it; in my previous arguments I explained so. I explained that policing agencies would build up into a "private army" and become the rulers of a land, and I explained how anarchy and capitalism are simply no match for each other. I also talked abut the "Drug Cartel" phenomenom, which the opponent seems to dismiss as total bluff. I would like to extend on how Anarchy and Capitalism are no match.You cannot simply be an anarchist and a capitalist at the same time; anarchy defends freedom and liberty for the common human being. However, the reasons for inequality, aka private property, are defended by the government, and in turn, private property funds the government. However, when taking the government away, we are totally left without any laws and rules that defend private property. Therefore, private property can easily be changed. For example, under capitalism, there are chances for stepping up and becoming rich; however, in anarchy, everyone should and must be equal. Contradicting itself, a man cannot step up without dealing with his society at large; he does not work for himself but also for the benefits of society. Therefore, a worker under Anarcho-Capitalism will still be a worker at the end of his life, while CEOs will still be CEOs, which destroys the foundations of capitalism. Anarcho-Capitalism is filled with contradictions, and a system filled with contradictions is a system that is impratical.Because Anarcho-Capitalism will create greed, create corporate conflict, judge people by proxy laws, contradicts itself, creates room for the corrupting of the capitalist system, and ignores the fact that greed is human nature, is why Anarcho-Capitalism cannot and will not work.It is because of these reasons, I urge you to vote con on this debate. I would like to thank the host for hosting this debate; it has been an interesting debate and has improved my knowledge on this topic. Citations:http://redroom.com...http://flag.blackened.net...