Sola Scriptora and there is no papal infallibility

You have an incorrect definition of papal infallibility. Here is the correct definition: "The preservation of the head of the Church of Christ from teaching error in matters of faith or morals. This preservation is due to the special assistance of the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of Truth, and is given in order that the faithful may be assured of the truth of their belief. In order to exercise this prerogative the pope must teach as doctor and pastor of all Christians in virtue of his supreme authority, not merely as a private theologian; he must teach a matter of faith or morals; he must define, with the manifest intention of obligating to consent; the definition must obligate the universal Church. The efficient cause of this infallibility is the Divine assistance. The object of papal infallibility is those truths contained explicitly or implicitly in the public deposit of Revelation, comprehended in Scripture and tradition. The ex cathedra definitions of the Roman pontiffs are irreformable of their very nature, independently of the antecedent, concomitant, or subsequent consent or concurrence of the Church, ie., the bishops and the faithful." The list of books is not irrelevant. since the bible has no list of books that are supposed to be in the bible then how we know what books are supposed to be in the bible? You just said that the Church compiled the bible. That is what I meant when I said that the church gave us the bible. Yes all man are imperfect. I agree with that. The pope is not infallible because he is perfect. He's not perfect. He is infallible in matters of faith and morals because Jesus gave him that power. Jesus said in the bible "As the Father sent Me, so I send you". How did the Father send Him? With all authority. And He sends them in the same way. He was speaking to the apostles, who were the first bishops and Peter was one of the apostles was the first pope. Are going to claim that Jesus can't give them that power? Jesus is all powerful so of course He can. It is made clear in the bible that when one of the apostles dies it is very important that someone else take his place, and the men who take there places receive that same authority. it is past down to them. The current bishops and pope, are their replacements. I believe that Scripture verse 100 percent, but I do not believe that it says what you are trying to make it say. So Scripture is God-breathed and useful for teaching. That doesn't mean that it is the only source of truth. NOWHERE in the bible does it say the bible is the only source of truth. If you can find ONE verse in the bible that says that the bible is the only source of truth, then I will admit defeat on the matter of sola scriptora. The bible can be very difficult to understand. We DO need help to understand it. If the bible is the only source of truth then what did they do before there were typewriters? Back then all books were handwritten and VERY expensive. Most people couldn't afford a bible. Why would a good and loving God make it that most people did not have access to the only source of truth? And if the bible is the only source of truth then why does the bible say in 1 Timothy chapter 3 verse 15 say that the pillar and ground of the truth is the church? Yes Scripture is united with the Holy Spirit, but that doesn't make it the only source of truth.