We should bring democracy into Saudi Arabia

Attacking my opponents case: My opponent's only argument is saying people like the way they are but that is easily refuted saying that: Protesters have held a demonstration against the repressive regime of Al Saud in Tarout Island of Saudi Arabia.Saudi Sunnis, Shias want to replace monarchy with democracy: Analyst. On Thursday evening there was a demonstration in the city of Qatif (Al-Qatif) in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia. The protesters participating in the demonstration in Al-Qatif showed several interesting posters and banners. One of these banners showed the written words "The people want the fall of the House of Saud" and meanwhile there are also several videos of the protest in the Saudi Arabian city of Qatif (Al-Qatif) in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia with its totalitarian dictatorship online at YouTube and other video platforms. "Our primary goal is the overthrow of the House of Saud, the clearing of the land of their filth, and the establishment of a new democratically elected government," say the activists of this demonstration against the House of Saud.The mass media of the Western community of values R03;R03;follow the strict line to ignore these peaceful protests for basic human rights and democracy in Saudi Arabia And if you don't buy that i have other arguments saying that: THE SENSITIVE SAUDIS: THEY WANT DEMOCRACY FOR EVERYONE ELSE. In a recent opinion piece in the Washington Post, David Ignatius characterized the underhanded Saudi interferences in the affairs of other Muslim and Arab countries as ""partly to keep turmoil outside their borders. It"s what the divide-and-conquer British used to describe as a "forward" strategy." Many informed and pro-democratic-reform Saudi natives, including a small number of royals, have been trying to warn the international community, especially the Saudi regime"s Western supporters and protectors, of the Saudi"s dangerous domestic and foreign policy objectives and their implications for the Saudi people, the Greater Middle East and the international community. Given the pro-Saudi author of the Post"s opinion piece and his paper"s political orientation and appeal to the current Administration and other Democrats in the State Department and in the US Congress, it will be a big mistake not to remind the autocratic Saudi ruling princes that destabilizing other societies to deflect attention from their oppressed people"s demands for change will have consequences. No going on to my case: Contention 1: Utilitarism. Since the beginning of the Arab Spring, analysts, policymakers, and pundits have debated whether democracy will actually take root in the Middle East. Even in nations such as Egypt and Tunisia where autocrats have been ousted, there is still considerable uncertainty and anxiety about what kinds of political systems will replace them. One thing, however, is clear: People in Arab nations want democracy, and they don"t just support a vague notion of democracy " they want to live in a country that has specific rights and institutions. At the Pew Global Attitudes Project, our surveys have consistently found considerable support for democracy in Arab nations and our most recent poll again finds a strong desire for democracy in countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, Lebanon, and Jordan. Big majorities in these countries say democracy is the best type of government. In Egypt for example, two-thirds believe democracy is preferable to any other kind of government, WHILE 70% WANT A DEMOCRACY. Contention 2: There will be democracy for abrab in the future. Historically speaking, what is now happening is without precedent in the Arab world. For the first time, Arab authoritarian regimes have been toppled, and others are threatened, by mass demonstrations calling for freedom and democracy. Previously, Arab regimes changed through military coups and other sorts of putsches, never through popular revolutions. Yet, while most Arab regimes now appear threatened, only two authoritarian rulers " Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia and Hosni Mubarak in Egypt " have been actually deposed so far. Theirs were relatively "soft" autocracies. Much more oppressive and ruthless rulers " Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi in Libya, Bashar Assad in Syria, and Ali Abdullah Saleh in Yemen " though seriously threatened, have proven far more resilient (up to now) in suppressing popular opposition. Even in tiny Bahrain, the Sunni minority has, for now, succeeded in maintaining its rule over the Shia majority, albeit with military help from neighboring Sunni-led countries.