The Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses Are Being Abused

"I think the United States Supreme court lied to me. " Of course The Supreme Court lied to us, so did mom, dad, sister, brother and friend. The Supreme Court reacts like us to a limited amount of truth. It cannot make a separation without the creation of a lie by some means, at some point, the basic principle of truth falls on need to know by non-bias separation. The point of separation is to create an order of things regarding general welfare to which relevance is created. There are very few universal or absolute truths to be found in the world and life. Every condition the Supreme Court faces is fixed in a single position or as close as possible, in any or all other condition it can become an untrue, false, or lie. In regard to fact. The Fourteenth Amendment is challenging the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence. The Abuse of the Amendment is as foreseeable as the abuse of the United States Constitution and Declaration itself in this matter. Dred Scott Vs Sandford (1857) By Constitution this case is over liberty granted person"s in the place of freedom to a P. O. W. (Prisoner of war). Slaves are, and have always been POW"s, Council ignoring this fact is abuse as well. In a Civil Trial it is criminal negligence. Hindsight being 20/20 the slave issue was never handled on a Constitutional level. This abuse of the United States Constitution being direct causes of Civil War. The civil case completely fails to provide any self-value to a request of a humans liberty from an Unconstitutional bondage of War. Instead it imposes legislated freedom, ignoring a basic principle that freedom holds no self-value. The intellectual blunder of the decision was not on the side of a slaves United States Citizenship as implied. It was in the fact that the civil action made a case against the wrong issue intentionally out of fear. Not accepting that a Slavery was not a citizen and why that was true. As a transfer of power from State to public private power had been taken place for Centuries and this is where the Constitutional battle was precedence to take place. We could go on to link slavery to Wars in Europe, Africa, and the Arabic nations. The Point of Judicial Separation chosen was the Southern United States. First step would have been to address citizenship of POW"s, then liberty not freedom. Lawrence Vs. Texas ( 2003) It is unclear if Texas defened the United States Constitution in this matter properly. However the issue Texas law is addressing with legislation against sexual acts of sodomy has Constitutional merits as listed when represented correctly. The issue in this case becomes a claim of justification in relationship to equality of liberty to marriage for sexual conduct when addressing Legal Separation. This is where a lack of experience plays a role in choice of Constitutional defense. Lawrence was representing himself and no longer the Untied States Constitutional liberty. The issue is addressing constitutional right without burden of representation. The article blames public morality for poor application of United States Constitutional understanding. Meaning judicial separation governing legislation based on basic principle and legal precedent. The majority of the argument is that a Gay and Lesbian couple is arguing as group asking the United States Court to separate a sexual act by law as only belonging to this group, who now consents to this sexual act. The burden ignored or avoided by the group of people, with use of civil Court and accusation was the burden of Common defense. The group was to share with the Court, before it used civil law as a weapon of forced ownership, without a common defense, so the Court could defense itself from self-incrimination to the many crimes and not one public choice. In defense of the United States Constitution and State of Texas the Constitutional common defense is a declaration of Binivir or Unosmulier and the follow a precedent of marriage and Civil Union. In an understanding of the process of Separation to obtain sustainable civil order. Obergefell Vs, Hodges(2015) The Fourteenth Amendment does in fact require State. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that State be provided for equal governing. Not the other way around Separation of Church and State. This is the instigation of a violation of a longstanding likelihood. It is marked as a violation by the simple instigation of public plagiarism. The neglect of Constitutional obligation is astounding here. 1. Public acceptance of plagiarism. 2. The incrimination of judicial separation into contract describing sexual acts publicly to impartial witness. 3. The total lack of representation being made to those who are simple accused of being Gay or Lesbian without clear course of judicial Separation. Again the representation in defense and preservation of the United States Constitution. Basic principles A. private contracts between men and private contracts between women. B. Legal Precedent was never established to any limitation imposed by law to these two types of likelihood with the acceptation of discrimination. The issues of social value exist outside the boundary of legal right to plagiarize a longstanding contract between a title given man and woman by men and woman. The word Constitution grants witness liberty to declaration Binivir and UnosMulier. Legal precedent grants right to declaration Binivir and Unosmulier by understanding Marriage is not Civil Union. An obligation to judicial separation cause a common law Marriage a Civil Union. A Common law same gender couple grants judicial separation right to place title of Binivir and Unosmulier. Holla 1755 in our lifetime it would not be surprising to me if this one issue goes on to be found to be a religious test to hold public office. As it relates to immigration and taxation more than civil right. As the basic civil right was never denied by law. That basic right and United States Constitutional obligation was and is title, by name. "Perhaps I should debate this matter with somebody else. " By liberty granted a person under a declaration of independence, I most certainly hope you do keep debating it. We all want justice, the use of God as axiom, has not yet granted all people the wisdom to understand justice only comes to all through impartiality of Separation.