The black death was caused by a volcano and not by germs.

Pro's arguments in round 4 are thus: 1. That there is a medical conspiracy to keep people in poor health He states " This is because if everybody ate a paleo diet, then, there wouldn't be any sick people and the medical authorities would be out of work and would have no authority any more. " CON notes many improvements in healthcare....Reductions in Child Mortality. Vaccine-Preventable Diseases, Access to Safe Water and Sanitation, Malaria Prevention and Control, Prevention and Control of HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis Control, Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, Improved Preparedness and Response to Global Health Threats (1) . These events show a medical concern for reducing ( and NOT prolonging ) diseases. 2. Pro then puts forth ..."Yes. There is concise writing and then there is deliberate avoidance. The latter being the case here." CON notes that CON has addressed each and every point put out by pro. If anyone is obfuscating, it is pro. 3 Pro states " The reference I used was to show that these disasters happen all the time and much smaller events would have caused the Black Death of 1359. Phewww???!! God help me!" CON responds that the Black Death had passed by 1359. Pro seems confused by many things, including chronology. 4. Pro states "It is difficult to debate with someone who is not educated in the fine arts of logic and language." CON responds that it is indeed difficult, and presses pro to educate himself. 5. Pro states that " Leaky gut syndrome, gangrene, food poisoning, diabetes are not true diseases. There are no germs involved here. " CON responds that having "leaky gut" results in a " greater risk of developing a bacterial infection in the small intestine." (2) Gangrene is considered an "infection" caused by bacteria (3) Food poisoning is defined as "Getting sick from eating food that has germs, viruses, or parasites " (4) ""Diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease," said Monica Moreno, an endocrinologist at Dixie Regional Endocrinology Diabetes Clinic. " (5) 6. Pro then erroneously states yet again that " all these conditions result in vitamin deficiency. " CON asks "Do these result in vitamin deficiency? Pro earlier stated that they were caused by vitamin deficiency. Which is it?" 7. Pro now says "Thus, my opponent is having difficulty in categorizing, analyzing and putting things into their correct context." CON responds by asking all who read this debate to consider who is having such difficulty. Obviously it is Pro that is failing in this regard. 8. Pro now posits " Con misinterprets information to suit his agenda." CON responds by asking all who read this debate to consider who " misinterprets information to suit his agenda." . Obviously it is Pro that is experiencing this problem 9. Now pro says that Diabetes is caused by vitamin deficiency. CON addressed this previously in round 3, to wit " Diabetes is not caused by a "vitamin deficiency" and is by the way yet another disease to which pro has referred. While there is a casual relationship between vitamin D deficiency , there has not been shown to be a causal link. CON awaits to see how pro misunderstands this distinction." Now we can see how pro misunderstands the distinction between casual and causal relationships. 10 . A quick look at two areas of Africa will give "real world data" to end this debate, While there is famine in eastern Africa, there is little Bubonic plague in that congruent area. While there is an outbreak of Bubonic plague in Madagascar, there is little famine on the island. Thus it is shown that there is neither a casual nor causal relationship between famine and plague. (1) https://www.cdc.gov... (2) http://ibsleakygutheartburn.bodyecology.com... (3) https://www.medicinenet.com... (4) https://www.webmd.com... (5) http://www.thespectrum.com...