Is there a god

First of all my opponent didn't bring any definitions, so I will.mind - the element of a person that enables them to be aware of the world and their experiences, to think, and to feel; the faculty of consciousness and thought;reality - the state or quality of having existence or substance;information - the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence;Premise one: Information represents objective reality.In the idealistic point of view, an idea exists in a state of perfection beyond space-time, and so reality can never match the idea because reality is limited by space-time. Material objects exists in the reality of space-time. They are information structures embodied in matter and interacting with energy. Information needs matter for its embodiment and energy for its communication, since we create ideas in our perceptions of physical objects, therefore ideas come after reality. Reality exists prior to our own observation or interpretation.If ideas came first, then then the mind is limitless, and we would be able to think anything. But our own experience shows that our thoughts are limited by reality, because physical objects exist in the reality of space-time. We cannot think of what doesn't exist, therefore our ideas are shaped under our perception of the objects in the real world.My opponent failed to give a convincing arguments in defense of his first premise. The claim 'Information represents objective reality.' is in huge contradiction with Brian Whitworth's paper since he states - ' The virtual reality model contradicts physical realism but not philosophical realism: that there is a real world “out there” generating experiences.' and later - 'In modern physics, it seems increasingly unlikely that the world is an objective reality.'http://www.philosophybasics.com...Premise two: Information existed prior to the first moment of the Big bang.Einstein's general theory of relativity predicted that space-time began at the big bang singularity. Before the big bang, there was nothing, no space, no time, no matter, therefore no information, nothing. Everything that we observe is apparently created in an instant. Lawrence Krauss in his book Universe from nothing, have argued that a flat zero-energy universe and quantum physics show that it is not only possible, but quite likely, that our universe came from nothing."Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist.' - Stephen HawkingThe God's complexity requires an explanation in its own right, which is far more improbable. For you to say that God is timeless or space less or any mysterious word in order to sound appropriate for his complexity, is a cop out. Just filling your own hypothesis with nothing and pretending that is something. The theist present the most lazy explanation by saying because we don't know yet understand everything, therefore God must have did it. Since religion makes extraordinary claims for itself, therefore there must be extraordinary evidence and explanations.https://www.icr.org...Premise three: Information can only exists within space-time insofar as minds perceive.Premise four: minds are dependent and limited by brains for their existence and function.I don't understand how these two premises support your hypothesis. Since your premise one failed, all the rest seems to come loose. I will ask my opponent to elaborate on premise 3 and 4.