creationism is best for the science classrooms

I must say that I was a tad disappointed with that response. But nevertheless let us get into the issues... "You say that without creationism there can be no meaning in life. Since all humans eventually will die then that is their only purpose. Why is that the case? How can you support this?." It really isn't that hard of a claim to prove. Atheists and theists both agree with that claim. William Lane Craig said that "If each individual person passes out of existence when he dies, then what ultimate meaning can be given to his life? Does it really matter whether he ever existed at all? His life may be important relative to certain other events, but what is the ultimate significance of any of those events? If all the events are meaningless, then what can be the ultimate meaning of influencing any of them? Ultimately it makes no difference" (https://www.google.com...). Even if the universe had never existed...what difference would it make since it is just going to go through a heat death? Nothing has any significance without a God. "We each give our own life because since I can prove my own existence, it makes logical sense that I am the one who gives it purpose." Atheist John Paul Sartre said that any person who believed that they could give themselves meaning believed in a noble lie. Nietzsche also called atheists out on trying to deceive themselves into thinking they had meaning. I don't see why you think you can give your life significance. No matter what you go through in life, you are going to end up dead (according to your worldview) and nothing will change that. No matter how you help people, no matter what "good" you do...it is all meaningless since everything ends up dead. Everything literally comes to nothing according to your worldview. "What 'plausible' evidence did you give that they exist? I must of missed it." Are you referring to Adam and Eve? Because I never made any claims about their existence but you did. Therefore you are the one who has to provide evidence supporting your claim. But since you don't seem to be able to do this..I will go ahead and support the claim that Adam and Eve existed (even though I never brought this issue up). The Bible is my evidence for their existence. And since you have no evidence that they didn't exist and I have evidence that they did exist...it seems it is more plausible to believe in their existence. If you want to discuss the reliability of the Bible I am happy to do so. "But still I tried giving you evidence but it was pointless because you didn't change your belief and you didn't give, to me, a plausible reason to have that belief." You didn't give me any reason to disbelieve in the existence of Adam and Eve. And you certainly did not give any evidence against their existence. All you did was say that they didn't exist and then you retracted that claim and said you were 99% sure they didn't exist for some random reason. And then you mentioned something about people not being able to disprove the existence of unicorns (speak for yourself in the future). "How is a belief that there is life elsewhere in the universe any more made up than the claim that God exists?" It is different because there is actual evidence for the existence of God. You have nothing to support that theory while there are cosmological, teleological, ontological, truth, moral, mathematical, and etc...arguments for God. And again, Creationism gives the best explanation for the existence of the universe. "How has the universe been rigged to our favor if,according to you, all life is trapped in a single, small planet while there is a vast universe out there?" I have explained why life feels rigged in our favor. See my argument in round one for more details. The point is that Creationism gives the best explanation for why the Universe/life exists. Therefore it should be taught in classrooms. The reason I am disappointing with your response is because you haven't properly addressed my points about Creationism fitting the evidence just as well as evolution does and you haven't properly addressed my points on Creationism giving the best explanation for life. You sort of addressed my point on the supposed meaning in life but hopefully by the time you read this you might understand that life is meaningless without God. I of course love to talk about the Bible but I would also like to focus on the topic of this debate.