The existence of the Judeo-Christian God is impossible

Thank you for being so understanding as to the fact that I am away on vacation as I write this debate. Anyway, on to the debate!C1.1My opponent challenges premise 4. However, we are talking about the Judeo-Christian God; not god in general. If we were talking about god in general, I would go along with this.Remember, the scriptures clearly state that it is IMPOSSIBLE for God to change. God's name, as discribed, means "Self-sufficient." C1.2I am glad my opponent brought up Jesus on the cross. I wish to remind my opponent that Jesus did not deserve his death on the cross and therefore it is not justice.Hypothetical argument:What if there was a judge that was supposedly all-just and all-merciful and person X comited rape and murder. This person is sentenced to death because of the Judge's justice. However, he is all-merciful so he sends person Y, who is the judge's son, to pay the punishment for him. Is that just?Please watch the video to the right. It goes much more in depth for this.http://www.youtube.com...God says that everyone will die for his own sins, yet Jesus did not sin so isn't that contradictory?This argument is the strongest point.C2Actually, I may remind you that the Bible says that "ALL scripture is given by the inspiration of God" thus p1 stands."Lack of opponent by the Jews"I may remind you that the gospels were written LONG after the events were discribed. Therefore, it is likely that the Jews may have dismissed his claim although are not-recorded in the Bible.Just because you are from David does not mean you are Messiah. Joseph's Father/Jesus' GrandfatherI want my opponent to give me his best reason why there is no contradiction rather than rebutting a ton of different websites. I will break down source 1.Source 1, from my opponent, gives the explanation that was originally attributed to Africanus.This begs the question, why do these "brothers" have different fathers? This explanation is strange, unrealistic, and without any scriptural evidence. Africanus himself did not provide ANY proof of this. Africanus himself stated "This may or may not be the truth of the matter; but in my opinion and that of every fair minded person no one else could give a clearer exposition, and we must content ourselves with it even if it is unconfirmed, as we are not in a position to suggest a better or truer one. In any case the gospel record is true." Who killed Saul?/Tyre and EzekialI will go along with this. However, I wish to present a stronger argument that I wish I'd have used insted. I have not seen a single apologist that gave a sufficent explanation. Ezekiel 26:7-14For thus says the Lord: "Behold I will bring upon Tyre from the north Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, king of kings, with horses and chariots, and with horsemen and a hosts of many soldiers. He will slay with the sword your daughters on the mainland; he will set up a seige wall against you. He will direct the shock of his battering rams against your walls, and with his axes he will break down your towers...With the hoofs os his horses he will trample all your streets; he will slay your people with the sword and your mighty pillar will fall to the ground...they will break down your walls and destroy your pleasant houses... I will make you a bare rock...you shall never be rebuilt, for I have spoken," says the Lord God.This is a failed prophcy for many reasons: The city was rebuilt [a]; Alexander, not Nebuchadnezzar, destroyed the city. [1] Notesa. Please see Matthew where Jesus visited Tyre. | Summary | God's contradictory attributes Immutable v. All-loving Just v. Mercy. Biblical Contradictions. Who was Joseph's father? Who killed Saul?Exekial's failed prophcy. (to replace 2) | Conclusion |I want my opponent to give EVIDENCE for all of his hypothesis in the 1st contradiction. Please don't say "Here, rebut this" and give me a source. Thus, I would like the conduct point to go to me.Thank you and back to you.