The God of the Bible is Not Consistent and is Not a Desirable Role Model

That being said- I'll jump right in. I make two claims today, and both are somewhat codependent. Those claims are: I. The God Of The Bible Is Not Consistent II. The God Of The Bible Is Not A Good Role Model I offer these definitions for ensured clarity: A. Consistent: Of a person, conduct: constantly adhering to the same principles of thought or action. (Oxford English Dictionary) B. Role Model: A person looked to by others as an example to be imitated. This being said, I begin my argumentation. I. The God Of The Bible Is Not Consistent A. The Old Testament Father vs. The New Testament Son In the beginning, we are reduced to a perfect, all-powerful, all-knowing God. However, this God is a jealous God. I will not waste anyone's time by listing the full verses, but instead reference the more extreme laws presented by God in Leviticus. If my opponent claims that these laws do not exist, I will insert direct quotations in my rebuttal. Nevertheless, God justifies slavery, genocide, sexism, and extreme death penalties (death by stoning for crimes as seemingly innocent as adolescent rebellion). This is followed in 30 AD by Jesus Christ, the self-proclaimed Son of God (completely human, and yet completely God). Jesus offers us only two rules: Love God, Love your neighbor. He tells the pious men following the Old Testament law of God that "he who is without sin among you, cast the first stone". But when did the vengeful jealous God of the OT become the humble forgiving man of the NT? It is entirely unclear. In fact, as God is fundamentally perfect and never changes, Jesus was sinning to instruct these men not to follow God"s laws. Therein lies the problem. B. God Himself Is Full Of Fallacy I'll keep this short and simply list a few. God is the creator of everything in existence today. God (by his divine nature) cannot comprehend sin. Somehow sin is introduced (who created it? ). God never wanted men to sin. God knew that men would sin. God is all powerful and as such could have prevented sin (claimed desire vs. action). God knows everything. God cannot know of sin. God does not know what it is like to sin, so man knows something that God does not. II. The God Of The Bible Is Not A Good Role Model Man Cannot Morally Act Like God I think given most of the points in my previous arguments, this can already be assumed. Unless my opponent truly shows that we as a society would be better off slaughtering individuals who did not believe as we do or those who break certain laws, my argument stands. Additionally, to follow God's example- self-fulfillment is more important than human life. If God truly did create our species for the sole purpose of self-glorification than to replicate that would be catastrophic. As convenient as it would be to have "love me or die" relationships, it is simply not feasible. God (as he presents himself in the Bible) is a tyrant. Conclusion: I have shown the gross inconsistencies in both the character of God (Father vs. Son) and in the claims of God's motives. I have also shown that God is not a role model for an ethical person to emulate. Simply, wrath and selfishness are not desirable character traits- and crushing those who refuse to love you and are weaker than you is a heinous crime.