Micro-Evolution will not undergo Macro-Evolution

Due to time restraints, I'll only post a quick rebuttal. However, I'll try to remain as accurate as I can.The Bible and Macro-evolutionFirstly, I dispute every premise, because my opponent substantiates none of them. Secondly, I dispute the logic of the entire argument. While the Bible states "facts", its facts are literary, similar to the facts of A Clockwork Orange. They are allegorical and not meant to be taken literally, but instead a history of the Jewish people. Furthermore, my opponent is in reality claiming the following argument:P1 - The Bible states true factsP2 - Science is a set of factsC1 - The Bible coheres with science.I dispute that the Bible states anything on evolution. Indeed, I claim that the Bible is wholly compatible with macro-evolution, and my opponent has not substantiated where it states otherwise.The Bible and Macroevolution Part Two:Again, I dispute every premise. Other than "science must occur" being a category error (science is a systematic way of thinking: it cannot be compelled, nor must it concur with the Bible), more importantly my opponent completely misses the mark with his first premise. Note my seventh point of agreement:"The debate is not about whether macro-evolution did occur historically, but whether it can occur"While I hold that macro-evolution did occur historically, my opponent's argument here is irrelevant. Moreover, I invite him to show us why Genesis One states macro-evolution could not occur. I do not see any reason to believe this is so. On God's Existence Again, I dispute most premises. For one, my opponent's entire argument is hiding the uncomfortable truth that by his world view, God's creation is completely flawless as it is now. I dispute in fact premise one. It implies that God created the world knowing it would "go wrong", implying it would not go according to his ideal wishes. This is a necessary defect, and therefore God's world could not go wrong. So we have a conundrum: either this world is perfect, or God by my opponent's view does not exist. Clearly, one is more likely than the other. Moreover, his case referring to just punishment is maddening. God allows for the murderers to murder for the sole purpose of punishing them? What kind of gleeful monster creates purely with the goal of their punishment? None of this, however, is even remotely relevant as a rebuttal to my problem of technology argument, which needs addressing.The Bible PropheciesAs has already been pointed out, the link does not work. However, I expect my opponent to actually explain why the Tyre prophecy stands up to scratch rather than proclaim it does then ad verecundium link me off-site.And secondly, regarding Joshua 10. While my opponent has given a very nice account of what the Bible says, it does not substantiate that the event took place. Indeed, ignoring the fact that no-one else in the history of mankind has registered the event taking place, I gave many arguments why the miracle is one that should make us disbelieve the Bible. Justifying EvolutionMy opponent has not answered my question that I put forward already: why is it that a single small change - the drop of water in the bucket - is acceptable, but enough changes - enough drops of water in the bucket - does not justify macro-evolution? Just as a drop of water followed by another and another will eventually start to fill up a bucket, so does enough evolutionary micro-changes start to become a macro-one.Examples of macro-evolutionI'll just list these off quickly:1) The Lenski experiment - proved the macro-evolution of e.coli strands by teaching them to eat citric food sources. This is the equivalent of humans adapting their entire ingestion system to eat metal.2) London Underground Mosquito - this mosquito type was isolated from other mosquitos, and has developed so much that it has become a separate kind. The term "mosquito" is kept only superficially[1]3) Sphinx Moths and similar creatures have committed not just evolution, but saltation, which occurs over a single generation[2]. Though incredibly rare, saltation is a strong justification for evoution.1 - http://www.gene.ch...;2 - http://www.plosone.org...;