Ray will get laid before Ethan.

1) Your definition never says I can't like it, it just says I have to be forced, so, actually this is upheld, showing as debater joetehgirl put it "that he's just too sexy for his pants" this was in reference to me, (check R2 source). If I'm too sexy for my pants, I will most likely be laid. 2) It still shows that short sexy men are more popular with the google posters, helping me, not hurting me. 3) "Thus, you will naturally have more muscle PERCENTAGE than I." As I showed in R2 I have 6 times more muscle per pound than you do (4.2% to .7%), 4.2% of my body weight is 3.8 pounds, .7% of yours is .84 pounds, showing I have more than gfour times as much muscle as you. Just a note, if you win n a fight it is because of the size difference, and the fact that I have no fat to cushion your blows, not because you are more muscular. 4) I asked three people who have seen you play basketball, one, a layperson at the game, said you were OK, the other two, both experienced in the game, said you were not good. No one said you were very good. You are at best okay in the eyes of others, nullifying this point. 5) One time usage of a not so obscure scientific term will not prevent me from getting laid first, this point is irrelevant. 6) I won't list any identifying info whatsoever, so as not to publicize any information that people would not want publicized, (Another reason to vote CON, I respect privacy) Although this is less accurate, I feel it is more polite, and I place the outcome of this debate on the truthfulness of following info (Besides, my opponent could lie about whether these girls actually did such proclaiming, as I don't know them all): 10 or 11, maybe 9. (I don't know for sure because I am not so attention starved that I keep accurate note of these things [Another reason to vote CON, PRO is an attention starved stalker]). So, I may beat him, tie him or lose to him on this point. I say we call it a tie to be fair. 7) The listed television show is fictional, that means we cannot take anything it says as truth. My Case: 1. He claims he has $500 in the bank that he could use to purchase some sexytime. Now, in a race to get laid by a prostitute I would be getting laid, while Ray is signing withdrawal forms. (Besides, he's a minor, doesn't he need parental consent, I don't think his parents will let him hire a prostitute). I win that point. 2. Merriam-Webster defines contact as "union or junction of surfaces" In this case, masturbation is the junction of the hand. 3. Although my opponent could be a victim of necrophilia, it is possible that his remains are never found. That is a possibility that wins me this point. 4. If he was trying to think of a person I don't know, he's stupid. He lists a girl that the vast majority of my school's male population wants to tap. Either he stupid, lessening his chances of getting laid, or he is way too picky to have any chance of ever getting laid. "As I have upheld my own points while rebutting my opponent's points AND refutations, you have little choice but to vote Pro." Even if he rebuts all my points, and upholds all of his, I will still win. No one can predict the future. He has to prove that he will get laid first, even if he was amazingly layable in the eyes of girls, he would have to prove that he won't spontaneously combust, or that we won't explode. Why vote CON: 1. I have refuted my opponent's case. 2. I have upheld my case. 3. I have shown that it is impossible for PRO to prove his point.