Weak Governments Should Be Overthrown

Thank you for your replies, now lets jump straight into rebuttals. "Weak Government is better than no government at all." This is not true in the slightest. While a weak government clings to the reigns of power like a disease they will use old tactics to improve themselves, if they try to improve themselves at all. While if their is no government at all, then the forge of conflict will produce someone who can actually improve a situation and be able to have change. "what good could possibly come out of forcibly depriving an official of government of their power?" Every leader who is not a tyrant and is voted in has a certain amount of years as their term. In the U.S. every four years we deprive an official in government of their power. I cannot comprehend why you think of this as bad, it prevents tyrants from dominating a government for life and prevents the same tactics used until they no longer have any meaning or simply do not work. "If we overthrow a government, we might risk poverty and invasion of the country, seeing that there is at the time no government to defend the people." If the people have been clinging on to a weak government for that long then they deserve to be conquered. If they fend off invaders then they deserve government. This is a simple practice found in nature, survival of the fittest. I am simply applying it in societal terms in times of war. "But even besides the point, overthrowing a government can lead to war, higher crime rate, poverty, invasion, Dictatorship, Tyranny and enslavement." If a government is weak then most likely all of this will have already come to pass. What do you think causes a revolution? What you have cited is not a product of the revolution, it is the drive that spurs on the revolution. "When Russia faced revolution, many thousands of people died in BOTH revolutions, one being the 1917 revolution, and the other being the 1905 revolution." Yes, and because of this Russia a while later became a global super power as I have already stated previously. Whether it was worth the price I will leave up to you. "Revolting against the government is a scary thing that here in America you can be killed for." Of course revolting against a government is scary, ironically enough about what you posted is that the United States itself was born through revolution and revolting against the government. "But the Emperor taking the throne was not a demonstration of revolting or overthrowing. It was an example of a new leader taking power fairly. " You mean taking power fairly by conquering other peoples and kingdoms? I don't understand how this is so much different than overthrowing a government. Both have conflict and loss of life, and even the by product of revolutions that you listed above can also be by products of war, it is irrelevant whether your fighting a revolution or conquering other kingdoms, the only difference is that with revolutions you actually have a valid reason rather than simple greed ad you must create a new government. "but to say that Nazi Germany 'overthrew' the Government is ridiculous!" I concede this point, you are right of course Hitler was elected. But Hitler was arrested for revolutionary activities, and in prison he wrote Mein Kampf, therefore a revolution is what actually put Hitler in the position to win election! If he had not published a book centralizing his ideas he would have never won. "there was plenty of revolt, chaos and fear emitting from within the people. No one like Hitler's tyranny except for the Nazis, The Italians and Japanese." No there wasn't. The German people, aside from a select few actually completely followed Hitler, and even if they did not my point actually has just been proved. If the people revolted against Hitler, then my point would be proved that weak governments should be overthrown as they would have launched a revolution to overthrow the "weak" German government. About the chaos and fear, if there was so many of this then why did the German people so gleefully support Hitler, fervently follow him, and do nothing when he called himself a dictator? You could argue that they were brain washed, but then they would have been brain washed to love Hitler, therefore they would not fear him because their fanaticism would be so strong. "To say that Weak Governments should be overthrown is to say we should endanger thousands of lives for no good reason. What would we have to gain out of getting thousands killed? " What do we get out of getting thousands killed in war I might ask? In revolution we should endanger peoples lives for a very good reason. This reason is for the social, economical, and personal improvement of the people, so that future generations will not have to decay under a weak regime. "China has always been a Market Economy, meaning China makes most of its money from trading. Valuables are traded between China and other countries, which are then used to produce marketing goods that will help produce profit for the country. China works itself half to death to make tons of profit. Working little kids into sweatshops that make shoes and other leather products for the Americans and other foreigners." How is this relevant at all? It does not mean that they still don't use violence, it simply shows the machinations of their government and has little to do with this debate. my point still stands.