Napoleon Bonaparte would defeat George Washington in a War #3

Rebuttals My opponent claims I conceded the guerilla tactics. I did not. All I conceded was the Spanish campaign. Contention 1. Guerilla WarI concede that Guerilla Tactics would play a role, but a very little role. During the American Revolution, Washington used guerrilla tactics to weaken the enemy before actually fighting the real battle, in which he usually lost. Without the French helping Washington, the British would have won the Revolution. If Napoleon could defeat the British, he would defeat Washington.I did not claim that Guerilla Warfare in the Revolution was a myth. If you had read, it said, "However, it is based on reality to a certain extent. There were certainly instances of the Americans using guerrilla tactics, particularly following Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. However, most of the time, Washington used guerrilla tactics to weaken the British before actually fighting using the traditional Continental Army." Battle of King's Mountain- Washington was not involved.Cowpens- British outnumbered.Napoleon won many battles while outnumbered.My opponent claims that Napoleon losing because of the winter in the Russian Campaign is false. Well after Napoleon conquered Moscow, he waited for Czar Alexander I to offer peace. However, the Czar remained silent. With low supplies and his troops lacking winter clothing, Napoleon was forced to retreat.2. Hate of the FrenchThe French had a special drafting system to fill their army.3. Multi-Front WarRemember that this is supposed to be between Napoleon and Washington, not Napoleon vs Washington, George III, Fredrick II, etc.4. Win-loss rationYes, Washington did win, but it was because of French support. Saratoga- Washington was not involved.Valley Forge (Trenton)- Outnumbered the British 1 to 2. They had 18 guns, the British had 6 light guns.The Egyptians did use unorthodox tactics. As someone in the comments said, "Campaigning against an Oriental enemy largely unknown in Europe at the time is certainly more daring than fighting against American guerrilla warfare."My opponent basically drops the statistics. 5. SoldiersYes, the Spanish Parisian army were not well trained. What I am saying is that troops that can follow orders would help. Montcalm's men during the Battle of Quebec were disorganized. Someone ordered a fire that was too early, disorganizing his men. By their second time to fire, their men were so disorganized, when the British charged they were scattered.6. NavyMy opponent drops the argument that the British had their navy blockading many ports during the American revolution. Could privateers do anything about it?7. ArtilleryMy opponent keeps claiming that the only way the Americans fight is with guerilla tactics. No, they fought in an open field too!Uses of artillery:1. Open field battles2. Naval bombardment3. Fort sieges8. CavalryExtend from artillery. Besides, what about the Battle of Camden? Calvary charges, Americans retreat.ConclusionMy opponent keeps claiming that the only way the Americans fight is with guerilla tactics. No, they fought in an open field too! If the British can defeat the Americans without French help, then Napoleon can also defeat the Americans. I have shown that Napoleon has much more advantages than Washington. Most of the time, Washington used guerrilla tactics to weaken the British before actually fighting using the traditional Continental Army. The real battles would actually be the traditional European warfare, in which Napoleon was a master at. The British had a similar fighting style Napoleon had. If the French hadn't helped the Americans, the British would have won. If the British could defeat Washington, then Napoleon can too.Sourceshttp://www.britishbattles.com...;http://en.wikipedia.org...;http://en.wikipedia.org...;http://www.napoleonguide.com...;http://en.wikipedia.org...;http://en.wikipedia.org...;