Total legalization of all drugs

Alright I didn't mind your insolence the first time, but now I see it's just blatant and irrelevant. I disregard anything Con has to say anymore because he is obviously biased. He has twisted my words to mean things that aren't even my views, and questioned my motives for reasons nonexistant. Con has compared the peaceful use of drugs to the capital crimes of murder and rape, showing how desperate for things to argue about he is. Although I will respond to end this debate.1. I wasn't ignoring your argument, I said nothing needed to be said as in I agreed with you. I "urge voters to see" your oblivious attitude concerning this entire debate has completely killed the mood.2. You cant make something illegal and then replace it with something else like that, if people want to smoke, they're going to get it illegally. They don't care what the law has to say about it, nor has anyone ever concerning their immediate life. I do acknowledge that second hand smoke is a danger, which is one of the reasons why I've stated MULTIPLE times that drugs shouldn't be taken around other people. People act in their own self interest, so they'll do what they want regardless of what lame nonsense you can muster.3. So now you're trying to tell me what my beliefs are? I clearly implied that it's solely the individuals fault for doing the drug around other people. You didn't advocate we should give welfare money to crackmoms but you didn't even recognize in amidst talking about neglectful druggie parents. Again, the individual's own self-conjured problems. Obviously what one person does can affect another person's life. It's called being a human being.4. You'd have to take an antibiotic for a LONG time for your body to "render it useless". Rarely are people prescribed antibiotics beyond one prescription. 30 capsules isn't enough to build that strong of an immunity that you're suggesting.P1. The fact that you even compared the "black market for killers and sexual slavery" to the massively larger black market for drugs shows how ignorant you truly are. If someone truly feels the urge to rape someone, they shouldn't be messing with drugs in the first place, that's a given. Again going back to the individual's choice to take that risk.P2. No, you have no point in this aspect. You'd have to be born retarded, dropped on your head, played football throughout college, and tripped and fallen on a boulder to be stupid enough to honestly believe that this line of reasoning could be used for legalizing crimes that SPECIFICALLY aim to harm other people. Don't ever compare leisure time to ruining someone else's life again. Your idiocentricy is giving me and the spectators a headache.P3. THAT'S BECAUSE THOSE ARE CAPITAL CRIMES AND THE GOAL OF THOSE CRIMES IS TO HARM SOMEONE. That's the nth time you've pulled that card. Next time choose a card that actually makes sense instead of seems desperate for an argument.P4. The argument is over the legalization of all drugs... So obviously that is relevant.P5. Taxes and the 21st amendment are why they won't make alcohol illegal.P6 - Bahaha now you're just wishfully thinking. In no way shape or form do I support bringing conscious harm to someone's life or their family. The topic of debate is ALL DRUGS, it doesn't matter what you've brought up, they are still an element of the argument. There's a lot more drugs out there than just meth, what would you rather I made a debate talking about why every drug but meth should be legalized? It goes without saying that a drug with that radical of an effect on someone shouldn't be legalized, but in the case that it was, it'd be the consumer's fault.In conclusion, Con responded in a biased manner throughout the debate and instilled irrelevancy throughout to dilute the topic as a whole. Thank you for reading this far if you've been able to sit and witness Con's uneducated views long enough to not get an advil. And those of you who did need to get an advil, it's alright. I need one too.