911 inside job

That drug use (such as heroine) is required to believe pro's conspiracy theories, is unchallenged."Can you come up with any reasons why the videos are full of lunacy ?"First enough with the cries for people to pay attention to your website.Second being represented by someone who doesn't even know how to copy a URL for subpages, and can't even pick one video found within a website etc.; is plenty. If this is not a reliable statement, please watch all of youtube and get back to me [5], I'll cry like a child if you haven't watched right random videos on it with no guidance provided for any of them being of greater importance *sarcasm*. Or am I being unfair, do I need to provide ten separate links to the same page?"Maybe yea I missed quote marks etc and made spelling errors , I dont have all day to check my spelling and quotation marks , Its not my job to educate you but you yourself."Clearly based on evidence of basic writing skills presented, one of us is lacking in education; in other words, please go back to high school, since the government failed you the first time around."CIA drug dealing etc is well known , check the contras"As said previously, please read your own sources before randomly linking them. The source provided fails to turn the CIA into drug dealers, but merely accuses them of not stopping the drug trade. From your source: "we have found no evidence in the course of this lengthy investigation of any conspiracy by CIA or its employees to bring drugs into the United States." -Inspector General Hitz "There was no testing done on the steel beam that failed,"Even if true; not investigating every detail with enough attention, is not proof that the investigators blew up the buildings."all large steel structures would have to be rebuilt because small fires can bring them down."Everyone please read that again... "Small fires," how were these uncontrolled multi-floor fires with no sprinkler systems small? Since those fires were so small, pro you should really test that level of "small fire" in your own home. Be sure to first disengage the water main for accuracy.Your source has the headline "MAGICAL THERMAL EXPANSION" due to not believing in thermal expansion of metal as even a potential problem. Whereas you have failed to point to even one thing to calls into question the validity of mine. Unless you count using a computer simulation, instead of actually burning down similar buildings."clearly didnt watch the videos I showed you"No one is going to waste three hours of their life watching all your videos. I'm damn close to wasting three hours of mine on this debate."they knew the terrorists would strike and therefore placed explosives in the buildings ." and "I dont blame bush for 911 ... hes really dumb. I dont blame the government either , but a rouge group of international criminals"So all your talk of CIA was unrelated to this debate, that or you change your mind so rapidly you probably get whip-lash from it.In addition to the earlier plagiarism, pro has now conceded the entire argument. As some random group of international criminals, would clearly be an outside job."These criminals control the military industrial complex"Proof of this? Or are we back into the Jew Lizard area of your delusions."Nanothermite technology"In short conspiracy theorists "need this technology to exist so it exists. There is some secret super thermite which can be placed in a canister which can survive 1,100 degree C so the primary charge doesn't go off" [6]."The fireproofing was unknowingly applied to the steel beams by people who had no idea that the 'paint like ' material consisted of nanothermite explosives"So now it was the painters who did it? This is laughable.Plus "athough a thermite reaction is highly exothermic, it is nearly impossible to effectively channel it sideways to cut a vertical beam" [3]. Splashing some on the surface, not going to cut it."hard scientific evidence proves it was a controlled demolition and we dont need to asssume anymore."Source? Oh right there isn't one. Please proceed back to my "small fires" point.The cartoon shows how wide reaching the conspiracy would need to be, thousands of people; without a single information leak from any of them. You have in an actual unique claim, added the painters to the list."We cannot claim to know, in any case, that the government could not keep a big and ugly operation secret for a long time."True. Yet this does nothing to prove there was a conspiracy that day. Worse even if we are missing details, such does not bridge the leap of faith needed to think that it was an inside job instead of the work of foreign terrorists."Operation Gladio is another conspiracy"Since we're now tossing out random unrelated things to this topic, I'll toss one in myself that is at least related...All the government cover up, was to prevent people from realizing the true cause of the towers falling, which was Godzilla! Or a case where the pieces really don't fit; the video provided (making the video count on this debate one). The Death Star was an inside job.http://www.youtube.com...Conclusion:Pro has presented no credible evidence to even hint that it was an inside job. That drug use is needed to believe what he has presented is uncontested.He should either return to high school, or test a small fire in his home comparable to the ones in the official story (since such small fires are easy to control, this isn't technically a suggestion of suicide). At a minimum he should check himself into a drug rehabilitation program.Sources[5] http://www.youtube.com...[6] http://www.debunking911.com...