The Problem of Evil does not Disprove a Benevolent God

As for my argument:P1 : Evil is subject to personal judgment and is a comparative concept. P2 : There exists a possibility of least Non-Evil by which Evil is judged. P3 : The definition of Evil is based upon real, perceivable possibilities. C1 : One's perception of Evil is dependent upon one's perception of possible reality. C2 : If possibilities exist, then Evil necessarily exists. P4 : The Creator of the reality is omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent. P5 : An omniscient Creator perceives all possibilities, even those excluded in reality. P6 : A benevolent Creator can create a reality that excludes Evil possibilities based on P5. C3 : By C2, a non-omniscient observer in reality can only compare perceivably real possibilities. C4 : By C1 and C3, Evil will always exist in any reality, even if created by a benevolent Creator. P1 - The notion that two individuals can have differing moral values indicates that there is at least a significant (if not total) degree of personal judgment involved. The concept of evil relies on comparison to exist; if there exists but one subject in existence with nothing to which to compare it, it can neither be evil nor good. Consider the following example:Person A has a cold, and Person B does not. If both persons are aware of the objective conditions of having a cold and not having a cold, then both can value having a cold as bad, since it instigates human suffering in comparison to not having a cold. Likewise, they can both value not having a cold as good in relation to having a cold. Now, say Person C is completely oblivious to the existence of colds. Although he has the objective condition of not having a cold, he is not aware of the possibility of having a cold or not having a cold and, therefore, cannot value his objective state because there is no means of comparison. Alternatively, say Person D is afflicted with a perpetual cold and isn't aware that it is possible to not have a cold. Likewise, he is unaware of the possibility of not having a cold and, therefore, has nothing to compare it to and cannot assign a value. P2 - Not all things are Evil, and since Evil is subject to valuation (evident in that a subject can be more evil than another), there exists a subject that is of the least Non-Evil. It is by a point of comparison to this subject that one determines if another subject is evil, and I shall refer to this as the "Moral Fulcrum". A common basis of comparison is the instigation of physical pain, where no pain is the Moral Fulcrum. P3 - We can only compare a subject to other subjects that are perceived as possible in reality which, in turn, determines the judgment of good and evil/bad. This can be illustrated by the following example: Imagine a hungry puppy standing beside its bowl. You are given two options and *only* two options:(A) feed him half the food he needs, or (B) feed him the full amount of food he needs. Option (A) should be quite obviously the evil/bad choice of the two. Now, consider if these are two *only* two options:(A) feed him half the food he needs, or (B) do not feed him. Given that these are the only possibilities, (A) should now appear as the good choice, which demonstrates that the exact same action can be good or bad when contrasted with differing sets of alternate, real possibilities. We do not compare this option in situation #2 to fully feeding the puppy, since that is not a real possibility. P4 - As per the definition required by the Problem of Evil, these traits are assumed. P5 - The Creator of reality exists externally to reality, and being omniscient, is aware of all possibilities whether they are real or not. The Creator's Moral Fulcrum is based on omniscient perception. See diagram (A) below. P6 - An omnipotent Creator of reality fully decides what is and is not possible within it. Such a being could exclude all that which is Evil according to this Creator's Moral Fulcrum. See diagram (B) below. C3 - Obviously, a being that is confined to a finite reality is only aware of the real possibilities that exist within that reality, and is unaware of the infinite possibilities that were excluded by the Creator. See diagram (C) below. The following diagram represents a simplified linear scale of the valuation of evil. In conclusion, due to the nature of comparison of the concept of evil, a being will always perceive evil as long as different possibilities exist. So, even if a God created a reality that excluded all evil (according to his unlimited perception), those being that are limited to that reality will still perceive evil (according to their limited perception).