Resolved: God Exists.

Thanks again for challenging me, this is technically my fourth religion debate but second "God vs. no God" debate, so let's see how this one goes.I wish I could address your arguments now, so many thoughts going through my head, but I guess I'll just leave it and let my brain cry because it can't be used yet :'(As most people on this site know, I'm an Atheist (hide the children!), but I am open to the possibility of a God(s) existing. I tend to go with what I see as fact, or what has the most evidence to support it, which in my eyes would be evolution, and several different theories pertaining to the origins of the universe, however the Big Bang is my go-to theory.I would also like to say that it is hard (don't necessarily want to say impossible) to disprove the existence of something. If you replace the word "God" with literally anything, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, for example, it'll be just as difficult to disprove the existence of it. Same goes for Allah, Brahman, Muhammad and more Gods of other religions, and considering the Christian God claims to be the only God..."You are great, O Lord God; for there is none like You, and there is no God besides You" - 2 Samuel 7:22"Yahweh is God; there is no one else." - 1 Kings 8:60"I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God besides Me." - Isaiah 44:6...And the Bible is the word of God [1], disproving other Gods from other religions would be almost a necessity for you to validate the credibility of God's word (after proving he exists). God, being a divine creator, if proved real, would go completely against his word (and he does not lie) considering a divine creator is the God in other religions, which, if the Christian God were proved to exist, would be quite easy to prove existed considering "God" is the same being, and the thing that makes the Gods different between the religions is basically the Holy Book associated with that religion and the God's name. For God to be proved real, the "miracles" in each Holy Book would "validate" the authenticity of that God existing, which is impossible, considering the Christian God is apparently the only God that exists.I can see that I got kind of carried away there, mostly because it's actually my first time thinking up this argument, but my main point is that it would be impossible for the Christian God (or any God associated with a specific religion) to exist, considering he cannot lie, he says he is the only God, and if proved real, other Gods would easily be proved real as well. Therefore, a God pertaining to a specific religion is not possible.But unfortunately for me, I can kind of see you're just referring to God as a divine creator, and not pertaining to one specific religion.So let's get down to business.When somebody asserts that something else exists, I'd say the burden of proof is on them. Considering the burden of proof is shared in this scenario, I'm going to explain how God most likely does not exist. And keep in mind, not having an answer to a question, such as something common like "how was the universe created," does not mean it was God. What gives us morals? I can't pinpoint the exact thing which makes us feel good or bad, other than our serotonin or dopamine levels rising and lowering, increased brain activity in certain areas, but because I can't exactly say why our brain activates in certain ways unfortunately does not prove God exists. Unknown answers does not prove the existence of God.Let's start with a couple theories with a reasonable amount of evidence to back 'em up with. I'll jump into one possibility regarding the "cause" of the Big Bang - quantum fluctuations. These are temporary changes in the amount of energy in a point in space [2]. I had a picture here, but Debate.org doesn't want me to post informative imagry. This sort of sums it up. So we are now aware that energy is capable of creating matter. The Uncertainty Principle comes into affect [3], which, in a nutshell, states that the more precisely the position of a particle is determined, the less precisely its momentum can be known. It's basically the fact that wave properties (yes, at the quantum level) cannot be perfectly examined. Now let me remind you that "nothing" doesn't exist. So the idea that "the universe came from nothing" is... well, wrong. The universe (as far as I can see, and what the evidence points to) came from energy. When the only existing, well, anything, in the universe is pure energy, these fluctuations can cause explosions, on a pretty big scale, which can lead to what happened in the early years of our universe - inflation. From this (over billions of years) galaxies formed, stars exploded, planets formed, moons jumped into our orbits, and life began (on Earth and possibly elsewhere). I've been seeing creationists kind of siding with the Big Bang in the sense that God caused the Big Bang to happen. Well, now that we've discovered quantum fluctuations and the possibility of them existing in a grand level, there's going to need to be a lot more evidence backing up the idea that God created the Big Bang. Animalia life forms have been shown to evolve from plantae life forms near hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the oceans [4]. God did not create life. Okay I'm really drawing a blank as to what to bring up now, I'm more interested in refuting your arguments, as I feel it's more important for you to prove the existence of the deity you're asserting exists, and for me to dispute each of your claims. Basically what we've got so far is that quantum fluctuations could have very well been what caused the Universe to come into being, and life can form without divine intervention - the two main concepts creationists believe God intervened with. So off to you, Lannan. I'm looking forward to the rest of this. [1] http://www.jesus-is-savior.com... [2] https://universe-review.ca... [3] http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu... [4] http://www.space.com...