Science Vs. God

I am going to use this final round to wrap up my argument. God cannot be tested, god cannot be known. To expect someone thinking logically to believe in so something like this is absurd. I do not have the right to say that god is 100% not real, this would be a claim that I do not have the knowledge to back up. I can however say that there is no need for god in the universe as we know it. Science works in amazing ways, we humans think of a topic that we would like to know more about and we figure it out. The most amazing part is the fact that we on this minuscule little spec in the middle of the universe can ask and answer such huge questions. I mean we figured out how everything started without any evidence for hundreds of years! Science is something that is humans use to question what we do not know. Science is what drives us to know more about the vast universe and everything it contains. Science is what makes our little minuscule species so incredible. God on the other hand is giving up. When we don't know something about our past or our future we instantly go to god the omnipotent being for safety. Instead of figuring out, how did the universe begin? What is thunder? What happens when we die? Instead of figuring this out we turn to god for comfort and warmth. I am not saying this is a bad thing, if people enjoy religion then by all means be religious. But even so, god kills human curiosity. In your arguments you have tried t find loop holes in science to hint that god must exist but you have yet to show me any proof of this all mighty being. You may say, there is no way to prove the existence of something like god. To this I say, why would you believe in something without proof? Faith? Do you believe faith has an impact on reality? I can assure you it does not. People die every day with faith that their god will save them. Why did they die? Was their faith not strong enough? If this is true please enlighten me on how this works, prove it. In your previous argument you speak of good and evil which do not exist. Good and evil are terms we use to describe something or someone who does of doesn't cooperate with societies views. When you step on a ant hill do you consider yourself evil? It wasn't on purpose so it is excusable right? And even so, they're just ants. That's how we think of things to make ourselves feel better but ants probably think of humans as horrible evil beings. What if an alien race came to earth and crushed us like we do ants, they would be evil right? Good and evil are meaningless terms when put into perspective. Now lets look at what would happen if god was proven real. You cannot believe in god and science on equal terms, it makes no sence. You either believe in the laws of physics which cannot be broken in this universe or you believe in a being who can break them. If god was real we would have to discard everything we know Because it wouldn't apply to god. If god defied gravity that would disprove all science regarding the laws of gravity. So either you believe in the rules of the universe that have worked perfectly so far or you think they are all BS that god can break at any whim. I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate and thinking of great arguments, but you have yet to show proof of gods existence, or even a reason as to why it is needed. I will not answer the utopia question as it does not relate heavily to our topic. That is a whole seperate debate on human behavior. You did not explain how the Big Bang is a faltered theory yet either.