Resolved: The Father Should Not Have Say In an Abortion

I'll make this short so that people wont look at the length of this debate and then run off in fear. 1) I pointed out that the father makes numerous sacrifices for the child whether he wants to or not, yet the pro keeps claiming that im only naming financial sacrifices when I have mentioned time and time again the non-financial sacrifices a father makes for his own son or daughter. He goes on to claim that my assertion is false because its only an assertion, then goes on to claim his assertion is right. Ironic I know. "The female makes sacrifices, the male makes sacrifices, yet the males sacrifices suddenly dont matter at all because the female makes sacrifices" is basically what the pro is arguing. 2) Pro responds to the genetic contribution argument saying that if the genetic argument was in my favor i would have used it but that I wouldnt ever admit to it.... Pro if you dont want to admit you lost one argument thats fine, but dont stoop so low where you claim I would act just as irrational and stubborn if I were in the same situation....Irrelevant is anything that is insignificant or unimportant, and 0.0006% fits the bill of both of those. The male still contributes the same number of chromosomes as the female and the Pro cannot overcome that. 3) After not rebutting my claim that the male doesnt relinquish sperm to the woman and forfeiting that point, the pro actually claims he did argue against it and then completely lies about what my argument was in the first place. Pro claims that I argue "that the man has the right to have a baby with this woman because he emptied sperm into her" Where I have only argued that the man is not relinquishing consequences or responsibility for his sperm, thereby meaning he is still responsible for his sperm and has not relinquished control of his sperm either. A sperm donor relinquish his sperm, a father does not though. 4) Pro initially responded to my middle ground argument by painting them all as unfair to the woman by assuming in all cases that the woman is the one wanting to abort when it was agreed that it wasnt. All of these alternate scenarios are beneficial to whichever parent is pro-life, which could be either the father or the mother. The point is that there is middle ground for both sides to pursue if they cant reach a decision, by extension meaning that no one side has to have more say then the other in order for a decision to be made. 5) We both agreed the child is not someone's property and pro goes back to asserting that the only thing that matters is that the woman is the host and continues to ignore that both give the same number of chromosomes and touts his irrelevant .0006% argument again. 6) I didnt ignore those arguments because I felt they didnt apply, I ignored them because you geared them against me and tried to force me to adopt a position I wasnt arguing (That women shouldnt have any say at all in deciding an abortion). Conclusion:In the end Pro said that my arguments were wrong because they are just assertions while he went on arguing that his assertions are correct. Ive provided sources and definitions for why my arguments were more then just assertions and the pro hasnt. Making sacrifices, being responsible for the child's conception, and contributing an equal number of chromosomes to the child are all reasons why the mother should have at least 50% of the say in deciding whether to abort or not. The father also does all of these same things, and therefore is entitled to his half of the say too. Thats all Im arguing. As for Voting:Arguments: Vote either way, Pro kicked a good amount of a** and he debates a lot better then most other people Ive debated, and he did pretty solid in this one in my opinion.Spelling: I dnot tinhk I scrwed up taht bad but if I ddi you konw waht to do (Chill out, im just trolling) Conduct: Id ask for this one, but I have a history of being a d*ck when I dont know im being one, so again you know what to do here.... But what would any of you know youre all just mindless peasants..... (AGAIN, just trolling)Sources: I had 4, but one was for a definition, and two of them were links to the same page that was just two pages long where each page had a different link, so really its 2 to 1...... Not exactly a .0006% difference, but still about even. (one does not simply stop trolling once theyve started)