Science Implies God's Existance

Thanks Con. From scientific study we can observe the great fine tuning of the universe. Which, by statistical logic, highly imply an intelligent cause, not natural processes or mere chance. The Cosmological Parameters of the Universe: 1. strong nuclear force constant if larger: no hydrogen would form; atomic nuclei for most life-essential elements would be unstable; thus, no life chemistry if smaller: no elements heavier than hydrogen would form: again, no life chemistry 2. weak nuclear force constant if larger: too much hydrogen would convert to helium in big bang; hence, stars would convert too much matter into heavy elements making life chemistry impossible if smaller: too little helium would be produced from big bang; hence, stars would convert too little matter into heavy elements making life chemistry impossible 3. gravitational force constant if larger: stars would be too hot and would burn too rapidly and too unevenly for life chemistry if smaller: stars would be too cool to ignite nuclear fusion; thus, many of the elements needed for life chemistry would never form 4. electromagnetic force constant if greater: chemical bonding would be disrupted; elements more massive than boron would be unstable to fission if lesser: chemical bonding would be insufficient for life chemistry 5. ratio of electromagnetic force constant to gravitational force constant if larger: all stars would be at least 40% more massive than the sun; hence, stellar burning would be too brief and too uneven for life support if smaller: all stars would be at least 20% less massive than the sun, thus incapable of producing heavy elements 6. ratio of electron to proton mass if larger: chemical bonding would be insufficient for life chemistry if smaller: same as above 7. ratio of number of protons to number of electrons if larger: electromagnetism would dominate gravity, preventing galaxy, star, and planet formation if smaller: same as above 8. expansion rate of the universe if larger: no galaxies would form if smaller: universe would collapse, even before stars formed 9. entropy level of the universe if larger: stars would not form within proto-galaxies if smaller: no proto-galaxies would form 10. mass density of the universe if larger: overabundance of deuterium from big bang would cause stars to burn rapidly, too rapidly for life to form if smaller: insufficient helium from big bang would result in a shortage of heavy elements 11. velocity of light if faster: stars would be too luminous for life support if slower: stars would be insufficiently luminous for life support 12. initial uniformity of radiation if more uniform: stars, star clusters, and galaxies would not have formed if less uniform: universe by now would be mostly black holes and empty space 13. average distance between galaxies if larger: star formation late enough in the history of the universe would be hampered by lack of material if smaller: gravitational tug-of-wars would destabilize the sun's orbit 14. density of galaxy cluster if denser: galaxy collisions and mergers would disrupt the sun's orbit if less dense: star formation late enough in the history of the universe would be hampered by lack of material 15. average distance between stars if larger: heavy element density would be too sparse for rocky planets to form if smaller: planetary orbits would be too unstable for life 16. fine structure constant (describing the fine-structure splitting of spectral lines)if larger: all stars would be at least 30% less massive than the sun if larger than 0.06: matter would be unstable in large magnetic fields if smaller: all stars would be at least 80% more massive than the sun 17. decay rate of protons if greater: life would be exterminated by the release of radiation if smaller: universe would contain insufficient matter for life 18. 12C to 16O nuclear energy level ratio if larger: universe would contain insufficient oxygen for life if smaller: universe would contain insufficient carbon for life 19. ground state energy level for 4He if larger: universe would contain insufficient carbon and oxygen for life if smaller: same as above 20. decay rate of 8Be if slower: heavy element fusion would generate catastrophic explosions in all the stars if faster: no element heavier than beryllium would form; thus, no life chemistry 21. ratio of neutron mass to proton mass if higher: neutron decay would yield too few neutrons for the formation of many life-essential elements if lower: neutron decay would produce so many neutrons as to collapse all stars into neutron stars or black holes 22. initial excess of nucleons over anti-nucleons if greater: radiation would prohibit planet formation if lesser: matter would be insufficient for galaxy or star formation 23. polarity of the water molecule if greater: heat of fusion and vaporization would be too high for life if smaller: heat of fusion and vaporization would be too low for life; liquid water would not work as a solvent for life chemistry; ice would not float, and a runaway freeze-up would result 24. supernovae eruptions if too close, too frequent, or too late: radiation would exterminate life on the planet if too distant, too infrequent, or too soon: heavy elements would be too sparse for rocky planets to form 25. white dwarf binaries if too few: insufficient fluorine would exist for life chemistry if too many: planetary orbits would be too unstable for life if formed too soon: insufficient fluorine production if formed too late: fluorine would arrive too late for life chemistry 26. ratio of exotic matter mass to ordinary matter mass if larger: universe would collapse before solar-type stars could form if smaller: no galaxies would form 27. number of effective dimensions in the early universe if larger: quantum mechanics, gravity, and relativity could not coexist; thus, life would be impossible if smaller: same result 28. number of effective dimensions in the present universe if smaller: electron, planet, and star orbits would become unstable if larger: same result 29. mass of the neutrino if smaller: galaxy clusters, galaxies, and stars would not form if larger: galaxy clusters and galaxies would be too dense 30. big bang ripples if smaller: galaxies would not form; universe would expand too rapidly if larger: galaxies/galaxy clusters would be too dense for life; black holes would dominate; universe would collapse before life-site could form 31. size of the relativistic dilation factor if smaller: certain life-essential chemical reactions will not function properly if larger: same result 32. uncertainty magnitude in the Heisenberg uncertainty principle if smaller: oxygen transport to body cells would be too small and certain life-essential elements would be unstable if larger: oxygen transport to body cells would be too great and certain life-essential elements would be unstable 33. cosmological constant if larger: universe would expand too quickly to form solar-type stars The list goes on…. The above list is scientific proof universe has many parameters which are finely tuned and by statistical logic imply design. Which imply the existence of God (the designer) The chances of having so many parameters in the universe fine-tuned are practically nothing. By statistical reasoning, it is not logical to attribute it to mere chance. A better explanation is that these parameters are so finely tuned because the universe was indeed designed. Origin of Life The probability of building a 150 amnioacid long protein (very basic) chain is 1 in 10^164. the first cell would have required hundreds of protein chains to exist at once, and then somehow order themselvs into a cell, which is far more unlikely. Universal Probability Bound: To support statistical reasoning, and show that attributing the universes properties to chance is logically incoherent, I will elaborate on the Universal Probability Bound. Anything with a lower probability than that of 1 in 10ˆ150 can by logically denied. Based on the following: 10ˆ80, the number of elementary particles in the observable universe. 10ˆ45, the maximum rate per second at which transitions in physical states can occur (the inverse of the Planck time). 10ˆ25, a billion times longer than the typical estimated age of the universe in seconds. Thus, 10ˆ150 = 10ˆ80 × 10ˆ45 × 10ˆ25. Hence, this value corresponds to an upper limit on the number of physical events that could possibly have occurred since the big bang. An upper bound on the computational resources of the universe in its entire history. This is estimated by Seth Lloyd as 10ˆ120 elementary logic operations on a register of 10ˆ90 bits Conclusion: The improbability of the fine-tuning of the universe greatly exceed the plausible limit, thus can be logically denied. By mathematical reason, God is implied by observing the universe. Statistical reasoning is the basis for scientific inferences, and cannot be ignored. Sources: http://www.godandscience.org... http://www.discovery.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.discovery.org... https://en.wikipedia.org...