Worshiping God

Thank you for taking this debate and may the best debater win. First you said: "God could value free will and his scientific laws. If God did not allow any injustice to be done, and all there was was good, good would no longer be remarkable. It would probably lose its taste for God." Here it seems as though you are binding God to human perceptions. We may perceive a duality (there is no joy without pain); however, God can do anything (supposedly). He could create joy without pain and he being all mighty is not bound to this human perception himself or doesn't have to be (if you take it that he can do anything hence omnipotence). "God isn't some puppet master, controlling our every action, deciding how strong the wind is today or tomorrow. He allows us to do whatever we will, he allows the universe to unfold as it will, whether that end in injustice here on earth or not." The existence of free will is still questionable at best (see:http://www.debate.org...). However, assuming it does exist we are already limited in many ways. The majority of things that we do or rather are done to us are completely outside our control. Weather, environment, diseases, etc. can't be controlled by man. I look at the world and I see that things could be a lot better, there seems to be so much unnecessary suffering all around that I can't accept the fact that the creator truly has our best interest in mind (if he exists). Therefore, I couldn't in good conscience worship him. I don't think others should worship him as well. "Victims of injustice can be given just rewards in the afterlife as compensation, injustice-doers can be given just punishment." This is simply poor epistemology. There is no logical or empirical proof that there is an after life or that it rewards the good and damns the evil. I really don't think this can be used as an argument in this debate. "There's no reason to not worship god in this case, and there's plenty of reason to do it [he made the universe, including us, etc.]" If God does not have our best interest in mind (by looking at the world I can say he does not) then why should we worship him? Hitler did remarkable things for Germany, he revived their economy, he made one of the most glorious war machines man has ever seen. Would you worship him? Stalin made vast improvements in Soviet industry and fed tens of millions with his plans, would you worship him? No we would not worship these people because although they wielded great power and achieved great things they did not have the best interest of the people in mind. I would argue that God seems to work in much the same way. He is benevolent in some actions but overall (from what I can see on earth) evil has conquered much and he has done little to stop it. I can't in good conscience worship that. "If God exists, he is likely to reward those who have worshipped him, or at least it is rational for a person to think this." You are basing this hypothesis on what exactly? That good people fall to the back of the line while the greedy and ruthless are rewarded? What here on earth has shown that God rewards the good? If anything it is those with no values, who will do whatever it takes get ahead and everybody else suffers. By all rational and empirical evidence we see on earth that God is not just. My opponents arguments seem to be more dogmatic than logical, I implore others to take note of this.