More Foreign Languages should be taught/offered in High Schools

I accept.Mark well the resolution: "More foreign languages should be taught/offered in High Schools" (emphasis mine).I will be arguing that most High Schools that have foreign language programs offer a sufficient number of foreign languages.Rebuttals:Pro writes "Students must have the opportunity to learn another language because that increased knowledge will help students prosper in the career the choose."Not necessarily. If I get a job as a farmer in the midwest, I'm unlikely to realize a tremendous benefit from speaking Estonian.Pro writes "Learning about more languages and cultures will enable students to connect with the entire world."Possibly. Of course, if I spend all my time studying Yazoo [1], I'm unlikely to be better able to connect with the entire world than someone who only speaks English.Pro writes "Professionals who know other languages are called upon for amazing opportunities that require that person to communicate with other countries."Again, depends on the language. Sure, I might be made a great offer that's only valid if I speak Reformed Egyptian, but the odds of that are long.Pro writes "Bilinguals have a larger advantage over those people who only know one language."Even though this is not sourced, it is probably true. However, Pro has failed to show that more obscure languages are preferable to the mainstream ones generally offered by schools.Pro writes "More languages need to be offered so all students will have the chance to increase their knowledge."Pro completely fails to justify how more languages will help all students to have a chance to increase their knowledge. I have never known a student (anecdotal evidence, sue me) that was fluent in every single language offered by the school. That means that every student I knew (anecdotal evidence, oh the pain) could have still gained knowledge through the language programs already offered by their school.Arguments:1. CostSelf-explanatory. There's no way you can advocate for adding additional language classes, and then claim that these additions will be free. More language classes will cost more money, the school will probably need to hire teachers who know how to teach the language, and it'll be a hassle.2. InconveniencesThere are probably already language programs offered at most every school. They'll be languages like Spanish, French, Chinese, Arabic, nothing too fancy. A school only needs a few language programs for students to choose a language from; adding additional languages causes a "slippery slope" issue. If my cousin successfully advocates for getting himself a Kusunda class [2], what grounds does the school have for refusing me a Kwadi class?3. Kids are stupidFairly self-explanatory. If you stick kids with three or four language options and say "Pick one", they'll pick one. If you say "Hey, we're expanding the language classes, sign up for whatever language you want", you'll have a ton of morons signing up for languages they never even knew existed and would have remained contently ignorant of.Plus, you'll probably get a bunch of languages only a couple of people want to study. Tie this in with my argument above, and you can see why this would be a problem.4. BilingualityMost schools offer decently usable, fairly common, modern languages like Spanish and Chinese. If I learn one of those languages, I'm about as equipped as can be. It's certainly of more use than that dunce who spent his whole high school career learning Latin [3]. If I'm going to receive an opportunity that requires me to speak some obscure language, the odds are definitely against me knowing it. Only in exceptional and overly uncommon circumstances would knowing some obscure language be of benefit.In conclusion, the small selection of languages offered by most high schools is sufficient.Sources:1. http://en.wikipedia.org...;2. http://hotword.dictionary.com...3. http://www.debate.org...