There is No Biblical Support for Young Earth Creationism

Tarzan, ""The proposition on offer is that there is no Biblical Support for Young Earth Creationism (YEC). This means that there are no verses YEC supporters can use to justify the date of the creation of the earth."" The resolution States "There is No Biblical Support for Young Earth Creationism". You are redefining again. Tsk Tsk. Silly Tarzan. "Ape Speak do not make Tarzan wise!" Grunting stick does not describe a tree. If you had spent more than an hour reading the source you would have seen that Normal cataloged knowledge of History takes over after the Exodus. The author of the source is using it side by side with the count contained within the Bible. The judge's timeline is met with a catalog of history. It is side by side but in a different paragraph. The Kings timeline is utilized after that and then it is cataloged next to history. You have to read all of the information to understand it. You again are mistquoting the source like you do the Bible. A nasty habit for your. You will never come to know God until you start paying attention. All of the assumptions the website is making is placing it in a historical framework. It is for study purposes and does not detract the "count" of the timeline. The date and time is 3 paragraphs removed. Please read more carefully. I can only assume you are attempting to convert Christians away from the Bible. But you use lies, deceit and absurd misinterpretation of the author's intentions. How is this going to convince anyone? You're attention span on my sources is causing you to suffer. 1)""There are no ages given for people/childbirth in the following Genealogies:"" That is irrelavent to the resolution. All of the genealogies used by the source include timeframes, historical records and historical catalogs within the Bible. The resolution has been met. 2)As stated above all timelines are given. The conjecture is irrelevant to the dates. It is only for Historical placement of the events in the Bible next to Egyptian history. The count still stands and contained within the Bible, the resolution is met. 3)Genesis 6:3 Wow, Shocking. You took it out of context again. You are so "want" to do that. The 120 years was the decree from God's pronouncement to the flooding of the earth, not how old men should live. Did you actually read the account? Its like me saying "Tarzan, I am only going to let you lie for 10 minutes more then you are dead!" Does that mean your decendants will only live for ten minutes? In contextual criticism you must read all of the information and then DISCERN the authors meaning. ""An appeal to the lunar Hebrew year is ineffective""- If you use a different calendar type year you wind up with a small numerical discrepancy that equates to a couple of decades. Heck, geologists date rocks between 2-4 Billions years old. Who is being too liberal in their dating methods? That is like "friggin" ridiculous. Did you even study the topic before posting this debate? Either way the Resolution is upheld no matter the calendar discrepancies. It is still biblical Support of YEC. Compare Matthew and Luke's genealogies – Irrelevant to the Resolution. You are just bickering. You said there was NO Biblical support for YEC, not whether you see another apparent inconsistency in a geneology. The rough time of 4000 B.C. is accounted for within the Bible. Read the source. Study would solve these inconsistencies for you. 4)The source ignores 2 Peter 3:8 – Ok, that was….just… sad. Peter was describing God's patience not a system of counting. Let me describe your patience in reading my sources. "With Tarzan, a minute is like a year! Clearly he read and broke down all of those genealogies because he did it for nearly 60 years!" In the same way I described your lack of understanding. Pretty effectively too. Get the concept? ""Furthermore, my opponent's source is Biblically incomplete, as it relies on the ages and reigns of Pharaohs combined with the writer's conjecture that these MAY be the proper persons matched to the proper times."" First No it did not. Second, EVEN IF IT DID we have a count up to Abraham and then 430 years to Moses. We know when that is in Egyptian history. We could count with Egyptian history from that point on and not use the Bible for the rest of the count. It would still be roughly 4,000 BC and still adhere to the Criteria of YEC with Biblical support, the resolution has been met. Stop being so silly. However, we do have a count within the Bible for timeframes that is around 4000 B.C. After the exodus we have Moses' lifetime, then Joshua and then the Judges, then the Kings reigns etc. Even if there were an inaccurate count after the Exodus we are unsure of then you would still be in the criteria of YEC at around 4,000 B.C. because we know the Egyptian history. The source was what is known as "historical parallel cataloging". Study more carefully and you avoid that "Swinging from a tree sensation." On the side note: ""Conjecture and ignoring inconsistencies in the Bible??"" -I have already reconciled all of your "apparent" inconsistencies. "" As well as ignoring a mountain of scientific evidence to the contrary???"" - You are making a mountain out of a molehill! Get it!? Haha! ""As well as ignoring the notion that a day to God is like 1000 years???"" - Your understanding of scripture leaves a tad bit to be desired.