Homeschooling is the best method of education

I agree with what my opponent said about the importance of education, And I'm glad that that is both of our goals. It gives us some sort of common ground in this debate. Now, To answer what was said by my opponent. He said that he is for the reduction of bullying. Yet, I would ask him, How can a student be bullied in an environment where bullies aren't present? Next, He said "I don't think that parents are uniquely positioned to teach in general. Maybe if your teacher is a doctor he could teach medicine, But other than basic morals and cultural norms we can't rely on them very much. " I want to particularly address when he said "But other than basic morals and cultural norms we can't rely on them very much. " Basic morals and cultural norms. I think that it is sad that my opponent has such a low view of parents. To say that they can't teach their children basic morals is really quite sad and wrong. Another aspect of saying that parents are not adequate teachers is that, When homeschooling, Parents can teach their children as they please! They can instill in them their chosen worldview, And they can all grow as a family in what they're learning. The nuclear family is one of the most sacred and important things in life, And homeschooling enriches the nuclear family. Yet another aspect of this particular argument is that in many cases, The students being home schooled are being taught by an online curriculum. And oftentimes the child learns what he needs simply from reading the curriculum book and proceeding with the activities! So EVEN IF my opponent was correct that parents are unfit to teach, The ability to teach is in many cases irrelevant. My opponent said that homeschooling creates "Problems of accelerated learning, Personalization, Efficient curriculum changes, And preparing students for a high-tech future economy" I will first address what he said first there. The idea that homeschooling creates problems of accelerated learning. In a public school system, The students are all given a one-size-fits-all curriculum! In homeschooling, A student can progress at the rate he needs to. A child struggling in math could take a little longer on completing his course. A kid who accelerates in science could move on or even skip to science that is at his level! In a public school system, This is not able to be accomplished. So what my opponent said here applies to public schools rather that homeschooling. The next thing eh said was "Personalization. " I would like him to elaborate on this, As I don't quite know what he means. Next, He said "Efficient curriculum changes" would have problems if homeschooling. I also don't know what he means by this, But I am guessing that he means that the change of curriculums according to the child's needs would be damaged. But just the opposite would be true! If a homeschooling child needs to change curriculum, He can change it any time if he requires it. Not so with public schools. Once again, This is true of my side, Not his. Finally here he said there would be problems with "preparing students for a high-tech future economy. " If kids are interacting every day with tech objects of economy in their home, They will be MORE prepared for a high tech future economy. In conclusion here, My opponent has offered only weak and very easily refutable points to support his beliefs in this debate. In order to win this debate, He needs to prove two things: 1. That homeschooling in the majority of cases either harms or limits students. 2. And that public schools in the majority help and further kids learning more than homeschooling. He can do neither of these. Back to you!