There should be more restrictions on violent video games

Ok, I am going to narrow down this debate and explain why I have won this round. There are many arguments that andrew.denslow could use to attack my case. His arguments are completely based on his own opinion. He also did not label his contentions so I will just start from the top and attack his arguments downward. andrew.denslow"s first argument: First of all, three of your four links are broken. Secondly, even if I believe you about your first point, which you haven't proven, should we restrict video games based on one study? When we talk about restrictions, we are talking about the people"s freedoms being restricted. We should have a lot of evidence before we think about doing that. My response to that: I have a multitude of evidence and examples that prove why there should be restrictions on video games. So when andrew.denslow claims that I have a lack of evidence, he is wrong. He attacks my evidence on an extremely accurate study, but he has failed to provide any examples or evidence for his side of the case. He did however have a semi-well argument about restrictions on the games taking away citizens freedoms. Now let me ask everyone a question. Do people deserve their rights if it puts other citizens in danger? I brought up this argument in my case. Smaller children are affected the worst by video games because they cannot see the line between the real world and the gaming world. The Connecticut school shooting. Adam Lanza was an American teenager who killed 26 innocent people during a school shooting. Adam went to the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on Dec. 14 and shot dead 20 children and 6 adults, including the school principal. He also killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, before he went to the school. He then killed himself, and the entire community has been left reeling in the wake of the horrific massacre. This is all because of video games. Adam was obsessed with Call of Duty, a very popular M-rated video game, and other extremely videogames. If restrictions would have been put on M-rated video games, those innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary School would still be alive and living a happier and safer life. andrew.denslow"s second argument: Also, shouldn't it be the parents job to stop kids from playing video games. We already have laws in place to prevent minors from purchasing games, do we really need more? If a parent doesn't want their kids to play violent video games, then they won't buy it. Why is it people think that the government needs to be parents? Parents should be parents. My response to that: The current resolution states: There should be more restrictions on violent video games. Keep in mind, this is the resolution that my opponent has chosen to debate and I am only basing my arguments off his resolution. Nowhere in his resolution does it state whether this is a U.S. federal law or a law within the family should govern the restrictions. Yes, it is the parents responsible to set restrictions for their children, but when citizens are attacked or hurt from video gaming addicts, it should become a government law to protect the citizens of this country. The government has the responsibility to protect its citizens and be a government. andrew.denslow"s last argument: Lastly, many restrictions would be ineffective. Unless you totally ban violent video games, than any laws couldn't plausibly be enforced. It would be wrong to ban violent video games. That is taking away people"s rights. It would also be dumb to ban all violent video games in an attempt to stop minors from playing them. Should we ban alcohol completely because it can really screw kids up big time? My response to this: I do not see how the restrictions would be ineffective. It is as simple as 2+2=4. Putting restrictions on extremely violent video games can only benefit society as we know it. Children would not be exposed to the violence in videogames and the overall safety of every man, woman and child would be preserved. For these reasons and more all I can see is a pro ballet! I look forward to my opponents next response.