Atheism is Arbitrary, Inconsistent and it Borrows from the Bible

How we got to debating about Christianity I don't know. This debate was only for discussing about atheism. I am assuming that Con cannot defend himself and must resort to changing the debate to Christianity. Although I am not obliged to answer his questions regarding Christianity I will go ahead and indulge him. "I could use the same fallacy to say that you're mistaken (as you are human) and God doesn't actually exist. " You actually cannot because you are begging the question by saying God does not exist when you have no proof. Since God does exists, Biblical Christianity is not based on man, But on God who alone has the absolute truth. Unlike atheism whose adherents beliefs are different one from the other. "Trusting the Bible as a source is wrong, Because the Bible says crazy things like "the world was created 6, 000 years ago" and "there was a global flood 4, 000 years ago" and "a woman got pregnant from thin air" and "one man suffered, So all of humanity's sins were forgiven" and "God is omnipotent" and thousands of other crap. Just because some book says so doesn't mean anything. You use arguments "since the Bible is true", But the Bible is not true, Or at least not by default. " Actually nature gives evidence in nature that the earth was created 6, 000 years ago and plenty of evidence for a worldwide flood. Though the Bible makes some extraordinary claims such claims are not truly illogical. The examples you mention, Although not everyday occurrences, They are not contradictory. They do not violate any laws of logic. You are simply dismissing those claims of the Bible that do not appeal to your personal, Unguarded sense of what is possible, You are being irrational. You are committing the logical fallacy known as "begging the question. " You have decided in advance that miracles are impossible, Thereby tacitly assuming that the Bible is not true because it contains miracles. "I also fail to see the argument how logically, There can only be one God. How are many gods illogical? How is Yahwe real, But Thor and Zeus and Allah and other gods false? They are false to me as an atheist, But why are they false to you? " If we had multiple sovereign authors of the universe create our reality, Try to imagine what our reality would be like if they disagreed. One god decides certain trees will have abundant green leaves on its branches, But the other god decides these same trees will not have any leaves at all under any circumstances whatsoever. The question we as humans are then faced with is do these trees have abundant green leaves, Or do they not? The answer, Of course, Is that both options are completely and wholly true and both are also completely and wholly false. The trees have leaves and it is not the case that the trees have leaves. At the same time. And in the same way. Not only does this make our reality incoherent and incomprehensible; not only does this make our presupposed universality and invariance of the law of non-contradiction invalid (though if it is invalid it may also be valid at the same time and in the same way); but this also points out an interesting fact about exactly what the gods themselves, The ultimate authorities over our reality, Each individually hold to be correct. Our first god who is sovereignly authoring the universe determines that these certain trees have abundant leaves. Therefore, He knows that those trees do in fact have abundant leaves. However, Even though he is right, He is also wrong. Even if this sovereign god directly informed us that the universe he created was non-contradictory, His personal opinion on the matter would not be trustworthy given the presence of the other equally authoritative god. Indeed, This first god cannot authoritatively guarantee anything at all for his created humans, So he cannot be trusted to present us with an accurate view of his very own creation. To misappropriate an old saying, If everyone is sovereign, No one is. If the law of non-contradiction is an untrustworthy test of truth, As it would necessarily be with multiple sovereign gods who are equally ultimate it is not possible to guarantee any kind of meaning for anything at all. Things may mean what they don't mean. Arguments may prove what they disprove. Assertions and their negations may be equivalent. No one, Not even the gods, Could be justifiably certain of anything at all. Rational thought, Dependent upon the universality and invariance of the law of non-contradiction, Would be non-existent. Another problem that would be faced is morality. Which gods morality would we follow? "Do you not see how disastrously wrong "humans are only moral because they are told so" is? It means humans are only moral because they are scared of God or want to go to Heaven! But how am I moral if I don't believe in God? And how are Christians immoral? You said that Christians can be immoral, But how if according to you GOD LITERALLY WROTE MORALITY IN THEIR HEARTS? " Yes, We are only moral when we are scared of God. The Nazis were not scared of God, Hence the atrocities. The USSR was not scared of God and look what they did. Our politicians are not scared of God and now they are all in for infanticide. In Europe they are not scared of God and the euthanize older people without their consent many times. I am not saying that atheists are immoral, But the law of God is written in their hearts as well. As for immoral Christian, Yes they also have God's law in their hearts, Yet they choose not to hear it. "The atheist worldview" is also crap. How many times does this have to be repeated? Atheism is not belief in the Big Bang. Atheism isn't a blind faith in science. Atheist isn't illogical. Atheism isn't arbitrary. Atheism isn't immoral. Atheism is simply the lack of belief in God/gods! I wish you understood that. " Are you saying you don't believe in the Big Bang?