Abortion is a Violation of Human Rights

Thank you for the quick reply.I am not arguing whether it's human or not. I am arguing about a fetus/baby that is in the beginning stages of life.Baby: Noun :an infant or very young child.. :a newborn or very young animal. :the youngest member of a family, group, etc. :an immature or childish person. :human fetus.(1) :a very young child; an infant. :an unborn child; a fetus.(2) Calling it a baby is appropiate. Your attack on what I choose to call it is unwarranted.===============================================1: ConstitutionThe Constitution can not be breached by a baby, who is well below the legal age (often set at 10) that someone can be convicted of breaching the law or Constitution."If you are under 10 you cannot be held criminally responsible. This means that you can't be charged with a criminal offence."Even after turning 10, until you are 13, you may not be Charged until there is evidence that you knew that what you were doing was wrong. "You can be charged with a criminal offence once you turn 10. But if you are aged between 10-13 you cannot be found guilty unless there is evidence that you knew what you did was wrong when you did it. It is up to the prosecutor (who might be a police officer or a lawyer) to prove that at the time of the crime you knew or should have known what you were doing was wrong." (3) A baby, especially when unborn, is well below the age where it can legally breach any law. This means the baby is innoncent of the Pro's accusation(s)."I bring this up because if the government forced just 1 women into feeling this way..."How a woman feels =/= what a woman is.A woman could feel like a slave, but if she isn't a slave, than the Government isn't breaching the Constitution.[1] http://dictionary.reference.com...[2] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...[3] http://www.legalaid.qld.gov.au...[]2: SlaveHere, the Pro has conceded that the mother does not own the Child, and thus dropped the argument:In the case of a mother and a fetus, the fetus is governed by its mother. Thus the child has no rights, unless the mother decides to grant the privilege.I would like to also point out that the fetus has no liberties that would help to define which rights it needs.Let's continue."Not wanting a baby and being pregnant is natural involuntary servitude."Nature is above the law.The Pro is trying to show that the Baby has inslaved the Mother. The Baby is innocent of breaching the Constitution (14th Amendment), UN Declaration of Human Rights (Article 4) and the law because it is too young to be found guilty of breaching the prior mentioned documents.Pro has even acknowledged that the servitude of the mother is natural:Not wanting a baby and being pregnant is natural involuntary servitude. If the process (of childbirth) is natural, than it is above the law of men, and the child and nature can not be held guilty of breaching the law. There is another reason the Child is innoncent...The Pro has confused a Dependant with a Slave Owner. A child isn't classified under law as a master or owner of a mother, but as a dependant.Dependant:A dependent is someone who is sustained by another person, such as a child supported by his or her parents.(4)Slave Owner:Someone who holds slave.(5)Legally (as seen actually written out in the first Definition) a child is not a Slave Owner, but a Dependant. If Pro's argument was right, than we would all be guilty of breaking the 14th Amendment, and appearantly death would be a reasonable punishment. Being a Dependant also implies the Mother must care for the child or adopt it to someone who will.This argument applies to the rest of Pro's Slave Argument.[4] http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...[5] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...[] 3: Right To Life and LibertyThe Pro has acknowledged the the baby is a Human.The Pro fails to understand that Self Defense (which doesn't always imply killing) may only be used if the other person is trying to harm you. If the person (baby) is innoncent of attempting to kill you, you are not permitted to kill the person.If you have a reason to believe the other person is attempting to do great bodily harm to you, you may defend yourself, but if you know for a fact that it isn't trying to, than you are in the wrong. I assume the Mother understands the Baby isn't actually trying to hurt her, and therefore she may not legally act against it. "...Under both Criminal Law and Tort Law, self-defense is commonly asserted in cases of Homicide, Assault and Battery, and other crimes involving the attempted use of violence against an individual..."(6)The Pro talks about the Mothers right to Self Defense, but ignores that the Baby is the one being threatened. Unlike the Baby, who isn't trying to hurt the Mother, the Mother is actually attempting to end the Babies life.I will also argue that a fetus has no rights to obtain due to it's dehabilitated status. I will display the 4th Amendment and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights again.Amendment XIVAll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.(1)The 14th Amendment claims in the following:"...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property..."The Constitution never mentions you must habilitated, or any other status... Just that you are a person.Someone who is Dehabilitated still has rights, and is still Human. Article IIEveryone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.Article IIIEveryone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.The UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights says Everyone... Not strong, or rehabilitated, or born persons... Everyone, has the rights listed. The Pro is trying to create distinctions that void's the Babies rights, but the UN grants these rights to Everyone, without distinction of any kind.The Baby is granted these right reguardless of Disabilities (like being born without arms) or being unable to speak or if it's dehabilitated.The claim that a Criminal has no rights is unwarranted. Niether me, the UN, or the Laws claims this.[6] http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...[]4: HomicideThe Pro has acknowledged that a Baby is Human.Therefore; The Pro has acknowledged that a Baby is a Person.Homicide: Verb: the killing of one human being by another. (Dictionary): the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another; murder: (Oxford): The killing of one human being by another human being. (Legal Dictionary): a killing of one human being by another (Merriam-Webster)Kill: Verb: to deprive of life : cause the death of. (Oxford): cause the death of (a person, animal, or other living thing) (Merriam-Webster): to deprive of life in any manner; cause the death of; (Dictionary): a. To put to death. : b. To deprive of life. (Free Dictionary) Based off the Definitions, the Mother (human) depriving the Baby (human) of life is homicide.[7] http://dictionary.reference.com...[8] http://oxforddictionaries.com...[9] http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...[10] http://www.merriam-webster.com...[11] http://oxforddictionaries.com...[12] http://www.merriam-webster.com...[13] http://dictionary.reference.com...[14] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...[]===============================================I have refuted the Pro's arguments and set forth an additional argument of my own.I pass it on.