God exist, and belief in His existence is rationally justified.

"Con wants me to give him an example of something existing outside of space and time. Thus I will do so. Think of an idea. Or a thought"I could have predicted this. Ideas are the products of minds and minds are the products of brains. "In philosophy, ideas are usually construed as mental representational images of some object. "Notice the word "mental" in the definition. Also, ideas don't act. An idea can't create the universe, itself. So ideas only exist in minds and minds are the result of brains, so the notion fails. Multiverse: If you alter the parameters, our local conditions would change, however I don't concede, therefor life couldn't exist. Theism is an incredibly poor cosmological model, even if this universe was the worse possible universe, theists could just say "god made it like that for vague reason x". If the multiverse does not solve it, theism definitely does not. Here's leading cosmologist Sean Carrol on Fine-Tuning. More on causality -. -:Pro once again asserts the KCA, even after I refute it. Once again:If it's the case that I can find one instance in which something begins without a cause, then P1 fails. Virtual particles come into existence from nothing all the time. The first test was conducted in the 1940's. In a hydrogen atom an electron and a proton are bound together by photons (the . Each photon shall spend time as a virtual electron plus its antiparticle--the virtual positron. The hydrogen atom has two energy levels that appearto have equal energy. However,when the atom is in one of those levels it interacts differently with the virtual electron and positron than when it is in the other, so their energies are shifted a tiny bit because of those interactions. Further more a vacuum yields protons. And this has been empirically observed "The researchers began with an array of 250 superconducting quantum-interference devices, or SQUIDs—circuits that are extraordinarily sensitive to magnetic fields. They inserted the array inside a refrigerator. By carefully exerting magnetic fields on this array, they could vary the speed at which microwave photons traveled through it by a few percent. The researchers then cooled this array to 50 thousandths of a degree Celsius above absolute zero. Because this environment is supercold, it should not emit any radiation, essentially behaving as a vacuum. "We were simply studying these circuits for the purpose of developing an amplifier, which we did," says researcher Sorin Paraoanu, a theoretical physicist at Aalto University. "But then we asked ourselves—what if there is no signal to amplify? What happens if the vacuum is the signal? "The researchers detected photons that matched predictions from the dynamical Casimir effect. "So P1 fails. However even if everything that began to exist, had a cause, one could not say that the universe has a cause. It's a composition fallacy. P1) Things that begin to exist in the universe have a causeP2) The universe began to existC) The universe has a cause The conclusion does not follow from the premises because it presumes the universe is like things in the universe. I don't have enough space to argue evolution, and origins of human life, but it's not necessary. Conclusions:1) Most importantly, something existing outside of space time is non-sense.