Israel has no choice

Before I continue, I have to say it has been an honor to debate the author of "My Immortal"[1]. My opponent mistakenly accuses me of stating she implied that Israel suck butt as an alternative. Of course, I would never say such an heinous deviation from the truth. It should be obvious to all I claimed she stated it explicitly. Additionally, she claimed I re-worded her answer to my debate. (As a side point, it is our debate, not just mine, although I appreciate the deferentiality. ) This is untrue. Her inexplicable spelling , grammar, and punctuation conveniently accomplished that particular misconception. My opponent then questions my sanity, presumably because of the suggestion of self-genocide. Certainly I am not advocating that course of action; after all, I immediately rejected it for not meeting the debate criterion for a reasonable solution. In fact, I was using it to illustrate the mere existence of a choice does not mean it is reasonable or even satiable. My opponent then laments, in a thoroughly esoteric manner, society's inability to refrain from emotional self-sabotage. I confess that I was unable to glean any meaning from the statement "so ur poor do that mean you get to a school bus? ? no and your sick well that is the way to cookie crumbles", although I'm sure it is profound. If my opponent would consent to explain herself more thoroughly, I would be delighted to give my thoughts on the subject. My opponent concludes her first thought with what I assume is a reference to phrase "You can catch more flies with a drop of honey than a barrel of vinegar. " I assume she is arguing that opening a line of friendly dialogue would create a Palestinian majority that is friendly to Israel, thus allowing Israel to relinquish control of the West Bank to a Palestinian state that would protect Israel's security interests. Unfortunately, I doubt that any amount of dialogue would create sympathy in the West Bank without actual liberating actions that would establish a security risk to Israel, seeing as the people whom Israel is trying to befriend are naturally those hostile to it. It is a catch-22. And finally, my opponent asked whether I am Jewish, in what was a distinctly antisemetic tone. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt, and assume it was a result of poor penmanship and not bigotry. Nonetheless, the implication was that my judgement is flawed, as I am not a disinterested party. Certainly, I'll be the first to admit that I am instinctively pro the Jewish state, because I am indeed a Jew. It is precisely this reason that causes me to post this debate; the desperate hope that I am wrong, and that a solution for the survival of my people won't have to rely on the subjugation of another. It is a situation that will not stand, that I do not want to stand, that no sane Jew or Arab wants to stand, but will stand nonetheless, lest Hitler's dreams finally come to fruition. It's clear you do not have an answer. In fact, its clear you do even have the capability to suggest one. If you think I'm wrong, prove it. Don't rant incomprehensibly. Don't preach anti-Israel rhetoric blindly. Don't type your answer so fast that it outstrips your thought process. Think. Analyze. Try to be intelligent. And, please, prove me wrong. As always, I anticipate your response. [1] . http://m.fanfiction.net...