God Exists

Thanks for making this debate. I'll save my refutations for the next round. (As the debate rules require). Argument 1:P1. In order to prove there is a god, we have to have a need for one in order to explain the mechanics of our universe.P2. We do not have a need for a god in order to explain the mechanics of our universe.C: Therefore, god is probably not real. Defense of premise 1:Pretty self explanatory. If we don't have any need for a god in order to explain the mechanics of our universe then there's no reason to assume he exists. Defense of premise 2: A common argument that theists make so that god is the only thing that could have caused our universe and created life. This is normally called intelligent design. Here are a couple plausible ways our universe could have come to be *without* including a god: A) Simultaneous causationThis is the idea that cause and effect can happen simultaneously. The cause of the Universe could have happened at the same time of it's effect. Let's say we have atoms A, B, and C. If atom A causes atom B, then atom B would cause atom C, and atom C would cause atom A.Why should we accept God over simultaneous causation?B)Non-Sentient force.Why can't the cause be an immaterial, causeless, eternal, powerful, spaceless, timeless, uncaused, non-sentient force that randomly creates things? Since this force was always, creating things, it was pretty much inevitable that energy, space, and time would be created in a powerful reaction destroying everything including this force to create the two. Why should we think God caused the Universe instead of this force?Then, I talk about the multiverse.The multiverse is the idea that we had so many different universes, with so many different combinations, that it made the right conditions for us to live in. For example, scientists have said that if a monkey is eternally hitting random keys in a keyboard it is *highly likely* that eventually something that would look like it was designed would come out, such as the complete works of William Shakesphere.Why accept god over the multiverse?Do we need a god for an intelligent mind to exist?Intelligent design arguments say often that we need a god to create humans, and our minds. I think this is directly rebutted by asking how god came to be:The ways god could come to be:1. god was eternal. God always existed.This would mean that an intelligent mind can exist without god. If we know that god is intelligent, and intelligent minds need a creator, then either god doesn't exist or this rule is faulty. (Both) God could be used as proof that intelligent minds do not need a creator.2. God has a creator. That would mean that there is something more powerful than our god out there. That god would need a creator, so would that gods creator, and so on...Therefore, humans do not need a god in order for an intelligent mind to exist. Even if we do assume that it's plausible for god to exist the fact still remains that an intelligent mind is able to exist without a designer. Defense of the conclusion: The conclusion is already supported by the 2 premises. No explanation for it is required.Argument 2:The problem of evil is probably the most well known and one of the most basic atheistic arguments. It goes like this:(Keep in mind that Pro and I confirmed in an earlier PM that we are discussing the Christian God)P1. God is supposedly omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient.P2. If God was omnibenevolent, he would have the will to destroy all evil.P3. If god was omnipotent, he would have the power to destroy all evil.P4. If god was omniscient, he would know how to destroy all evil.P5: Evil exists.C: Therefore, god cannot.it's a clear contradiction. God would either have to be incredibly lazy or evil in order to allow pointless evils to happen, both of which contradict with the definition of god. Thanks for reading this. Next round I'll give my rebuttals to Pros arguments and then you can vote.Have a nice day.