The U.S having a 2 political party system

"The Republican Party and the Democratic Party do not want an X party to emerge of equal value.... This is not a matter of speculation or conspiracy that some random means are preventing another party to form, but of common sense"I have never heard of the American Nazi party and the America Communist party along with other completely opposite parties deciding to form a new party. There is absolutely no evidence that all these parties are trying to make a new super-party and there is even less evidence that the Republican and Democratic parties are behind why this has not yet happened. "Take Pepsi and Cola they do not want another powerhouse X drink that will take up shelf space."Yeah but it happens.... Root beer, Sprite, 7 Up, Sierra Mist, Dr Pepper, Fanta, all these sodas are available but Coke and Pepsi are the most popular because they connect with people the most in terms of taste, MUCH LIKE THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTIES. "With stagnation and lack of ordinary grounds provides an environment of confusion concurring a system that is intractable"Voters do compromise on issues you know...... They are not mindless opinionated zombies who dont know how to punch a hole in a ballot, voting for a candidate is pretty straightforward...."The dysfunctional two party system produced a financial meltdown...."Not even close,http://en.wikipedia.org...http://useconomy.about.com...http://theeconomicrecession.blogspot.com..."the Tea Party is proof to that yearning for change or again radical changelessness. "Oh yeah because the Tea party always puts their own candidates in the election and when you see their names on the ballot it says "Tea Party" next to it....................... Oh wait thats not true, since Tea Party activists are just a branch of REPUBLICANS who are pro guns, pro life, and against big government. "Republicans have an idea and the Democrats have an idea but they never can get their idea across like an old married couple"Thats called politics.....If this whole debate is a rambling argument trying to say that the US should not be a two party system because the current two party system doesnt get sh*t done, then thats a really bad argument because A) third parties cant do any better at getting anything done than the two main parties..... B) Politics is designed to be slow because the system created by the founding fathers made a government that would not be so responsive to change but would still work at a reasonable pace to create laws that abide by the parameters within the Constitution..... C) On large issues there is almost never an easy, reasonable, and proven solution to a problem meaning that both parties, and any other party, would argue viciously over what would work........ And D) Adding a third party into such a scenario would be like adding another internet retard into an internet argument going on between two other internet retards. Now we have three internet retards arguing over something and even if one party wins it doesnt matter because that party is still retarded so to speak.....If it was made so that Republican and Democratic parties were forced to let some radical third party debate into the discussion then even LESS would be accomplished, at the expense of the Republicans, the Democrats, the voters, and Americans as a whole1) Independent parties are more radical then Republican and Democratic parties2) Independent parties do not get the message out because they suck at campaigning and getting funding, not because Democrats and Republicans keep them down3) Independent parties are not trying to form a new super party4) Politics is a lengthy process and somehow limiting the power of the two main parties to allow some crazy a** third party to only further slow down the process would be bad for everyoneThis is why the US should remain a 2 party system.