There is undeniable evidence that God exists

Before I begin my debate, I would like to start my second round with a testimony of mine. 4 years ago--I was only 10, but I still felt a longing for a connection to the God I had learned about in Sunday school. One weekend, my family and I were on a camping trip. There were gravel roads everywhere, which I enjoyed riding my bike on. On our last night out, it was getting really late and I wanted to ride my bike one more time before I went back to my camper. Well, I took a shortcut down a really large gravel hill and my bike slid out of control. My bike flipped and I landed on my head. I was unable to stand. Blood had covered my eyes so much that I couldn't open them and I thought I had gone blind. So I sat, knowing it would be impossible to go back to my campsite by myself and I couldn't see if I tried. But I heard voices next to me, grabbing my hand and helping me up. They took warm rags to my eyes and told me what I had hoped to hear: I wasn't blind; I had hit just above my eye. When I opened my eyes, there were two women (who said they were nurses) with a pile of clean, wet towels hanging out by their camper. A man got in a pickup truck and put my bike in the trunk while the two ladies helped me ride on the back. I don't remember much after that except I finally arrived at my campsite. When my parents tried to thank them a week later, they were never found. I would've never made my way back if they hadn't been there. It was ironic: the two women were nurses, they just happened to have a bunch of wet rags next to them, the man just happened to have a pickup truck a few feet away from where I crashed, the woman just happened to tell me words of comfort, and I just happened to crash next to the people who potentially saved my life. How do I know God exists? I've experienced His work myself. There are too many "just happenings" that occur to tell us it must be more than luck. It has to be God. And this is just one simple story; I could tell you more stories of how He's proved himself to me! And God hasn't just showed himself to me, he's shown himself to others: http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... I could give you thousands of testimonies of how God has revealed himself in their lives! But for the sake of time, I won't share any more. Now, I would like to address some of my opponents arguments: For starters, I would like to point out my opponent has failed to provide ANY evidence against the arguments I provided that support Biblical occurrences, therefore I would like to ask that my opponent be specific with his attacks. He has made simply assertions with no proof to back anything he says up. Secondly, my opponent argues, "Empire of David and Solomon are largely found to be utter fiction." In November 2008, archaeologists discovered what was probably the remains of David's kingdom found in the Valley of Elah where the Bible says his kingdom was (http://www.sfgate.com...). I also gave you some evidence of a broken pot with King David's name written on it in my first constructive. If that isn't enough, please let me know exactly how much evidence you wish for me to provide. My opponent stated, "They are explaining and glorifying a past that didn't actually happen by taking from the works of the surrounding culture." This is like saying: the Egyptians wrote hieroglyphs about their lives, but they were all just stories that "didn't actually happen by taking the works of the surrounding culture." Remember: the Bible is a historical record, not a bunch of made-up stories bunched into a book. Thirdly, my opponent mentioned, "Further the claims that the early records are all very similar to each other is absolutely false. They actually varied greatly from text to text." However, my opponent did not explain this idea, therefore it is unclear as to how they are varied at all. He also made a point to say, "The texts we have today are not a reliable copy of the original text." Yet again, he has not given any reason to believe this is true. I have given evidence in my first constructive to prove this is true. Fourthly, my opponent mentioned, "Whereas if we apply the same argument for God we are left with the idea that either God popped out of nothing or was created by a super God." This is not the case. God neither popped out of nothing, nor was he created by a super God. In Genesis 1 (as I'm sure my opponent is familiar with) talks about God creating the universe, which is also the God my opponent defined in his beginning statement, therefore contradicting himself on his own definition of "God". My opponent brings up the Big Bang theory. He said the universe began from a single point. Where did the single point come from, if there was no God? Again, I'm going back to the simple analogy you disapproved at the beginning of my constructive. It is scientifically impossible that something (and something being the single point) can come out of nothing. Pure logic can tell you that something cannot come out of nothing. Fifthly, my opponent brought up, "Whereas if we apply the same argument for God we are left with the idea that either God popped out of nothing or was created by a super God. The biochemistry of early life is largely unknown and beyond being unknown we don't even have a good grasp on the most basic requirements." I would like to thank my opponent for agreeing with my argument. He has made it clear that evolutionists have yet to understand the requirements for life to exist. Yet, I have made it very clear with evidence from my first constructive that life, intelligence, and a world is impossible without God. Sixthly, my opponent can insult me about my "poor understanding of science" and explain the processes (which I am aware of), but he has failed to answer any of my questions regarding intelligence. How did intelligence come about? It doesn't take a genius to find flaws in the theory of evolution (which is still considered a theory). I have a simple question for my opponent: What you consider "undeniable evidence"? Just an explanation of his resolution, whether it be detailed or simple, I would greatly appreciate. My opponent can deny all of my evidence, but my evidence still stands. I do not expect my opponent to agree, but I would like to respectfully point out that all of the evidence I have proven is authentic and direct, yet my opponent gave NO evidence disproving ANY of my arguments—he simply gave me his thoughts and scientific processes. My opponent has not given me anything to disprove God. And I disagree with my opponent; I have met my burden of evidence to prove God's existence, and that is why I respectfully ask for an affirmative vote.