There is more evidence that God does not exist, than there to is prove that he does.

And of course, welcome to debate. org :) Pro argues that there is no evidence for the existence of God. I disagree. I think its simply just he who will not accept any. I will today only give one argument for the existence of God, which is the teleological argument. The Teleological Argument 1: All designs imply a designer 2: There is great design in the universe Conclusion: Therefore, there must be a Great Designer of the universe (God) We see great design in the universe which cannot have come by chance or coincidence. let me give some examples: 1) If the rate of expansion that took place following the Big Bang had been just one in a billion billion parts different (1/1018), the universe could not have come into being. [1] 2) If gravity were stronger, excessive ammonia and methane would collect in the Earth's atmosphere, which would have a most damaging effect on life. If it were weaker, the Earth's atmosphere would lose excessive quantities of water, making life impossible. [Ibid] 3) The Speed at which the Earth Revolves: If this were any slower, the temperature difference between day and night would grow enormously. If it were any faster, then atmospheric winds would reach enormous speeds, and cyclones and storms would make life impossible. [Ibid] 4) The Earth’s Magnetic Field: If this were any more powerful, very strong electromagnetic storms would arise. If it were any weaker, then the Earth would lose its protection against the harmful particles given off by the Sun and known as solar winds. Both situations would make life impossible. [Ibid] 5) The Earth’s Distance from the Sun: If this were any greater, the planet would grow very cold, the water cycle in the atmosphere would be affected, and the planet would enter an ice-age. If the Earth were any closer to the Sun, plants would burn up, the water cycle in the Earth's atmosphere would be irreparably damaged, and life would become impossible. [Ibid] 6) The Thickness of the Earth’s Crust: If the crust were any thicker, then an excessive amount of oxygen would be transferred to it from the atmosphere. If it were any thinner, the resulting amount of volcanic activity would make life impossible. [Ibid] 7) The Thickness of the Earth’s Crust: If the crust were any thicker, then an excessive amount of oxygen would be transferred to it from the atmosphere. If it were any thinner, the resulting amount of volcanic activity would make life impossible. [Ibid] In The Mysterious Universe, the English physicist Sir James Jeans describes the flawless order in the universe: A scientific study of the universe has suggested a conclusion, which may be summed up . .. in the statement that the universe appears to have been designed by a pure mathematician. [2] This great fine-tuning of the universe proofs that a designer of the universe must exist. This cannot just have come by chance or coincidence. To say that is very illogical indeed. My opponent need to show us logicaly how these fine-tunings in fact came by chance or coincidence. If he cannot, then we must conclude that these fine-tunings must have been from a great designer. But why must God be this designer? Because that's the most logical thing to believe. If the cause of the universe had a cause and that cause had a cause ad infinitum, then there wouldn’t be a universe to talk about in the first place. For example, imagine someone who wanted a job as a police man. To get this job, he must speak to the boss. When he speak to the boss, that boss says that he has to speak to his boss, and than the boss of that boss says that he must speak to his boss, and this went on forever. Would that guy ever get his job? No. It must be a boss who himself has no boss. In similar light if we apply this to the universe we would have to posit an uncaused cause due to this rational necessity. That cause must himself be uncaused, and this being is no more than God, who himself is not caused. Conclusion I have clearly shown that the universe has great design in it, and that God must be behind it. For Pro to disprove this argument, he have to show us how the universe could in fact have come by chance or coincidence, and at the same time disprove all the clear examples of design which I showed. If he cannot, we must conclude that God exist. Sources[1] . http://harunyahya.com...; [2] . http://harunyahya.com...