There's as much evidence that Wotan and Lord Krishna exist as there is that Yahweh exists

Just to clarify, Wotan is the supreme god of Germanic and Norse mythology (analogous to Zeus in ancient Greece. Some people believed Wotan and Zeus to be the same god). Lord Krishna is (believed by Hindu's to be) the 8th incarnation of Vishnu. Lord Krishna is the embodiment of love and joy and the destroyer of pain and sin. I am arguing that the Christian god in particular (not god in general) is no more likely to exist than Wotan or Lord Krishna (at least in the superhuman state that is claimed). Ok, let's start with Wotan. What evidence do we have that Wotan exists? I think we can be certain that no one alive today has ever met Wotan. Here are some of things that Wotan is responsible for: 1. Along with his brothers, Wotan slayed the Giant Ymir, then subsequently made the Earth out of Ymir's flesh. There is no evidence that this event occurred, it contradicts an incredible amount of scientific evidence for how the earth was formed. It contradicts the laws of physics. I think anyone who believes this did indeed happen would struggle to justify it. 2. Wotan and his brothers then found 2 logs. Together, they gave the logs breath and life and brains and hearing and sight etc; the logs became the first humans. There is no evidence that this event occurred and contradicts the overwhelming evidence in favour of evolution. Once again, believing this to be true would be difficult to justify. I could give more examples, but I think you get the idea. From the evidence we have, concluding that Wotan exists (or existed) would be highly irrational. We have no evidence that Wotan exists and solid scientific evidence contradicts things that he apparently did. The only rational conclusion is that it is extremely unlikely that Wotan exists. Now, Lord Krishna. He is believed to be the manifestation of god in human form (for which no evidence has been presented). The 'proof' that he exists can be found in scripture; this does not constitute evidence. Any scripture can assert anything, they don't present any evidence for the claims they assert. Given the evidence available, the existence of Lord Krishna as a person (and more importantly, as a divine being) cannot be claimed with any reasonable certainty. My main point on Krishna is that if he did exist (which there is only anecdotal evidence) we would struggle to justify claiming him to be divine, due to the fact that there is absolutely no evidence of this. Finally, Yahweh. What evidence do we have that Yahweh exists? The Bible? Does this inconsistent, self-contradicting article constitute valid evidence? What the Bible does is assert that Yahweh exists, nowhere in the Bible is there any evidence of this claim. Furthermore, the pathetic and sometimes outright evil actions of this god do not do his credibility any favours. The almighty creator of the universe, the most perfect being imaginable, thinks it is so vitally important that no-one is jealous of their neighbours or (heaven forbid) works on the Sabbath, that he felt the need to personally write it out in stone (one can't help wondering why Yahweh would not use more sophisticated means of writing, but that would be digressing). The almighty, perfect god decides to create gay people and then order them to be killed. He decides to create people and allows them to be enslaved. Women and girls being brutally raped does not seem to concern him. I have many, many more examples of how Yahweh is morally abhorrent and how people's views of him contradict the Bible, which I will happily discuss on request. This, of course, does not prove that Yahweh does not exist. It shows that if he does, he is an extremely vile character (and I can't help wondering why he doesn't come down with a tablet of stone and order all atheists to be pillaged). When you look at the people of authority at the time, the Bible becomes terribly contrived. Because of what god (apparently) said, the rich men who ruled over the people, could be rich and have as many women and slaves as they desired. I find it hard to believe that the almighty creator of everything would behave in such a shallow manner (although this doesn't prove he doesn't exist). The point here is that the Bible is very convenient for the people in charge at the time. Also note that Yahweh has seized to make appearances on Earth (at least to any credible person). All Yahweh needs to do is make an appearance, which he was not afraid to do back in the time of Moses. Why would he not do this? Taking all of this into consideration, what reason can we find to believe that Yahweh did indeed exist? There is absolutely zero tangible evidence that he existed. Powers he gave to individuals (such as Moses) resulted in phenomena such as magically parting water, which contradicts the laws of physics and is therefore not credible. The actions of the supposed almighty being are abhorrent to us mere humans, which is not very credible. We should expect that a being capable of creating a universe and all of the infinite complexity of it, would be more enlightened than one of his creations. So, conclusively, there is no evidence and no reasoning that leads to the existence of Yahweh being any more likely than the existence of Wotan or Lord Krishna (at least in his supernatural form).