I will not contradict myself

I have asked (and PRO has answered) 10 questions in the comments section. Any answer given that you can't find above is most likely from his comment. These are in no particular order. =========== Contradiction #01 =========== Flattery: •excessive or insincere praise •Flattery (also called adulation or blandishment) is the act of giving excessive compliments, generally for the purpose of ingratiating oneself with the subject http://www.google.com... 10. Has Stephen Colbert showered Glenn Beck with excessive praise? "No, I do not consider Stephen Colbert's praise of Glenn Beck excessive." 2. Is imitation a sincere form of flattery? "In my opinion, yes." Steven Colbert often imitates Glenn Beck, as seen here: http://www.colbertnation.com... He says that imitation is a form of flattery, but then he says that Stephen Colbert, though he imitates Glenn Beck, does not flatter him. A clear contradiction! =========== Contradiction #02 =========== 2. Are statements made in Round 1 presumed to be correct by you? "I think rule 5 protects me from these types of questions." 5. If I asked you 'Are all statements you made in a previous debate correct?' and you answered 'yes,' could I prove that some statement on a previous debate contradicts a current statement? "if I did answer yes, you could do so" Early in the round, Pro says that rule #05 protects him from any questions like this, but then he later testifies that I could infact ask the same type of question without rule #05 anulling it. The 2 are exact opposites! =========== Contradiction #03 =========== If you post something incorrect, does that count as a contradiction? "Only if you can prove that I posted something incorrect in this debate/comments... Lies in other debates do not count." Is 0.99999...(continuing infinitely) inequal to 1? "Yes" There are multiple proofs that .999(9) equals one here: http://en.wikipedia.org... For example, here is one: X = .999(9) 10X = 9.999(9) 10X - X = 9.999(9) - .999(9) 9X = 9 X = 1 .999(9) = 1 He has posted something incorrect, while saying that doing so would be a contradiction. =========== Contradiction #04 =========== •several: of an indefinite number more than 2 or 3 but not many; "several letters came in the mail"; "several people" http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu... Revised question #2: Are the statements made in round 1 true? "several of the statements in my round 1 are imperatives that either CON or PRO loses or wins..." Here are all imperatives that either CON or PRO loses or wins: "CON must post 10 questions... or else CON loses" "PRO must respond to all questions... or else PRO loses." These are the only 2 imperative sentences. All others are declarative/interrogative. He has not posted several (more than 2) imperatives, just 2, thus his answer is in contradiction to this answer: If you post something incorrect, does that count as a contradiction? "Only if you can prove that I posted something incorrect in this debate/comments... Lies in other debates do not count." =========== Contradiction #05 =========== 8. [Is] your income status correct in that you're 'not saying'? "It is correct that I am not saying on this website." 8. Do you make more than $1,000 weekly? "No." Pro has announced his income status on the website while saying that he won't.