Humans would survive the typical ( slow zombie ) zombie apocalypse.

I will begin by saying that my opponent has presented many good arguments. However I can still defend several off mine. Also a warning. Some of my arguments are in all caps or followed by exclamation points. This is not to show frustration or anger towards my opponent. I have added those as a way of showing keys words or quotes.1. Walls. in The Walking Dead we see a small block in Woodbury get walled off by civilians. The "wall" was composed of overturned buses and trailers and wooden structures. It was around 1 story in height. That is a very small, flimsy wall. Yet it held out against the zombies for around a year before a group of other humans breached it with weapons and explosives. If that wall could hold then a Government built superstructure certainly could. Would it be expensive, yes it would. However taxpayers are likely to feel the need for it over other municipal expenses. For example, a city spend millions building a sports stadium. Those millions could easily be put towards walls and citizens would show much higher demand for them.2. MilitaryHelicopters are actually very efficient. a trained soldier on a helicopter mounted gun could easily kill hundreds of zombies in 1 circle around an area. MG's fire off huge amounts of powerful ammunition and are extreamly powerful. If even one of those bullets scores a head shot then you have a dead zombie. Missile systems and bombing raids also provide quick and easy methods of killing hundreds of zombies in 1 go around. Tanks would also not be st oped in their tracks by a mere hundred zombies. A tank can ride over and crush several cars at once. Those are metal machines designed to withstand damage. A zombie is a chunk of brittal flesh and melting organs. A tank would roll right over that. The Navy would also provide that huge sea going edge that zombies just can't match.3. Island NATIONSI am not talking about some empty island somewhere. I'm talking about small island nations and micronations that are capable of self sustaining. These islands already have a population and will likely shut down their ports ( if they even have more than 1 ) the moment things get bad. for an example of a large island nation I will use Cuba. Cuba is a nation with a decent standing army and a huge amount of guns. It is also known for being extreamly cautious with diseases. Cuba sent 100's of doctors to west Africa to aid with ebola. They told these doctors that before they even got on a plane they would be compleatly searched physical and medically for traces of ebola. If the official serving even suspected they had ebola then the Nation of Cuba would not allow them to come home ( ever! ). Nobody would be getting to a place like this. Human paranoia would cause for massive airport and seaport closure and even land border fortifications.4. Doomsday Bunkers. Who is going to go into a doomsday bunker other than the head of state, his/her family, and select special forces units. Nobody with a bite would ever make it through clearance and as such the inside of the bunker wouldn't be infected. The bunkers are stocked with enough food and water and medicine to allow it's occupants to survive for a very large number of years. Decompossure ( even on a typical movie zombie ) would have been completed by this point. It would at least be in its final phase ( the one where the zombie is basically a pile of guts on the floor that groans alittle). I used the walking dead as my example of a typical zombie type ( besides the part where everyone is infected that isn't typical ). as I have shown with the link provided in the comments even the Walking Dead has had its zombies show decomposition. It is natural for something dead and without a functioning circulatory system to rot away. In TWD we see around 1 or 2 years go bye and already the zombies appear weaker and have lost most of their outer organs, skin, and much of their muscles. That is only a fraction of the time that people would last in doomsday bunkers.5. Virus spreadI already established in the rules set out in round 1 that a typical zombie apocalypse involves infection by way of BITE ONLY! This means that sexual relations, bodily fluid contact, inhalation and other forms of contamination do not spread the virus. Reproduction would not be impared due to the virus because reproduction can't spread it. Also it appears as though you believe it takes days before symptoms are obvious. Typicaly it only takes hours. CDC and WHO would at least warn the public about that fact. 6. Adam and Eve repeatAs stated above reproduction dosent stop due to the virus. You are right in saying that it took thousands of years to populate the earth on that scale. That is fine. We did it once we can do it again. Plus it is likely that more than 2 people will make it. It dosent matter how long it takes. All that matters is that when the Zombie population drops to 0 we have a population of at least 1. Humanity ( unlike zombies ) adapt quickly to new problems and either eliminate or avoid them. Eventually Zombies would die off or even starve to the point of immobility ( yes a zombie gets hungry and can starve, as is stated in several movies and books ). If you mean to tell me that we can't save at least 1 man and 1 woman for a period of 3-4 years then you are sitting on a probability that is very, very small. Humanity has endured before and we can very well do it again. 7. North Korea ( again )I'm certain that millions of zombies would eventually start moving towards north korea. However I will list several defences and deterents that would stop this from being fatal.1. China and North Korea are conceded mainly by bridges. Kim Jong Un would likely order those destroyed at the first sign of a zombie herd. 2. The Wall. Following the bridges are two walls one in front of the other. These are a decent height and are rather sturdy. They are manned by sniper towers, arillery guns, pillboxs, and patrols thousands strong. Soldiers would pick them off quite easily as zombies don't follow strategy and are not stealthy whatsoever.3. China has fallen. in the event you are proposing china would have likely fallen. North Korea would be left with no reason not to drop nukes on bejing and other major cities just to kill the zombies there. The Chinese east coast ( where all those people are ) would likely become a nuclear wasteland. NK don't really care about collateral damage.8. Reconsider my round 2 arguments about weather and terrain 9. Other notes:I would like to now point out how my opponent said there are 7.3 billion people and " MOST of them would in fact die". Again you stand against yourself. All I said was that humanity would survive. Most of them dying means that some of the lived. If even 2 people live than mankind survived. My argument is that a zombie apocalypse ( if it happened ) wouldn't result in humanities extinction. BTW, the things my opponent said about police and what the government is capable of, almost certainly incorrect. most governments could end the apocalypse before it ever escaped 1 city. All the TV and Movie apocalypses would be pretty boring if the police killed all the zombies in episode 1 though wouldn't they. Governments can respond properly, but for the sake of good television, Hollywood dosent show it on TV. Also it is highly doubtful that someone would be infected very 30 seconds at the patient zero or police stages. A typical zombie ( as I said ) walks ànd can only move at jogging pace ( at its fastest ). Humans can run. The second people see 1 or 2 crazy guys covered in blood trying to chase people they will scream, run and call the police. As I said it could all be over before it has a chance to begin. Some nations have so many guns that zombies would have problmes lasting long there. In the US there are 9 guns for very 10 people. That's alot of guns. in north korea, nearly 1/3 of people are armed military soldiers who are trained in weapons use ( it's sounds crazy but it's true ). In those places citizens would probably arm themselves quickly in defence of their families and property. Remember everyone. Only 2 people need to survive this and they only need to last 3-4 years At the most. I believe this proves my point that mankind would survive.