Resolved: Hitler vs Justin Bieber

I'll put forward my own arguments, and then refute my opponent's. (1) Looks http://www.debate.org... Everyone knows that looks are all that matter. If you're sexy and hot, then the world is yours. If you're ugly as fvck, then you're sh!t out of luck -unless you're a power hungry, domineering megalomaniac Nazi douche. Whether you're into guys or not, Justin Bieber is twinkishly adorable. http://www.debate.org... What is a twink? According to Wikiepdia, a "Twink" is "a young or young-looking man with a slender, ectomorph build, little or no body hair, and no facial hair." And omgz... don't you just want to eat him up? Sorry for queering it up in here... if it's too much, just dodge the rainbows and glitter. http://www.debate.org... Hitler, in contrast, was an ugly@ss motherfvcker. That dude had a mustache which was probably the size of his tiny penis, nasty dank greasy hair. Hitler was the original nappy headed ho', yo. And he wore a Nazi uniform, which is about as sexy as homeless man having his face eaten off by a gang of teenagers on bath salts. Forget crack... bath salts will fvck up you and the rest of the world. Hitler, for that matter, is kind of like the bath salts of historical figures. And his head looks like an uncircumcised d!ck -that sh!t is just nasty. http://www.debate.org... Did I mention Hitler always looks like he's either just sh!t himself or like he's ready to kill the world? I mean, he did try to kill the world, sort of, but Justin Bieber is smiling and happy unless he's being chased by some paparazzi d!ckhead or called a little b!tch by some jealous old creepy camera man. Bottom line: Justin Bieber is pure, sweet sexyness. Hilter is one ugly@ss fvck. (2) B!tches and Ho's Justin Bieber practically has girls chasing him wherever he goes. See the first video. Dude probably get's more action than a gynecologist's forefinger. http://www.youtube.com... Hitler is just followed by a bunch of Nazi b!tches -who are b!tches because they killed Anne Frank. Fvckers. See the second video. http://www.youtube.com... Some creepy@ss sh!t. Now, to refute my opponent's case: THE HOLOCAUST WAS NOT A FVCKING GOOD THING GOD D@MN!T! The Nazi's burned people to death in ovens, killed millions of men, women and children and a whole lot of other aweful sh!t you probs already know so I won't repeat it. (see the third video). I mean really... Hitler killed more than 1.5 million CHILDREN! Evil SOB, fo' sho'! Way more evil than J. Biebz -and while it may be the case that something is not necessarily true by the fact that a majority of people claim it to be true, the fact that Hitler killed more than a total of nine million fvcking people makes that claim totally legit. Evil dude, no doubt. http://www.youtube.com... Justin Bieber visits children in hospitals and sings to them to make them feel better and get healthy again. (see the fourth video, it's my source!) Biber never killed anyone... although he is still young. http://www.youtube.com... Justin Bieber probably would have sang for Anne Frank in her camped tiny@ss attic, too. Think about it. My opponent says that the song "Baby" is evil and OFFERS NO PROOF WHATSOEVER! He's trying to trick you with a warrantless claim. To quote the great philosopher Mackelmore, "I call that getting tricked by an [Imabench]!" What? My opponent claims that Justin Bieber inflated his twitter followers, and is therefore evil. I'm calling BULLSH!T! Justin Beiber has almost 40,000,000 followers on twitter and that only prooves that he has made more than four times as many people happy as Hilter killed. Case closed. Done. Nuff' said. That's it. Hitler kills people. Biebez makes them so happy that forty million of them want to follow his twinky @ss on twitter. My opponent claims that Bieber has corrupted a generation's taste in music. And since when are Benches the final critics on musical quality? I fVcking love the Biebz and his music. His voice is as sexy as his eyebrows. That just one vocal minority disagrees (ahem. my opponent) doesn't make it true! What? That's right! I just threw argumentum ad populum back at you, PRO! What now? My opponent claims that Bieber never helped economic recovery, and that Hitler did. Well, at least Hitler didn't make himself head nigga' in charge of his country and then drive it into the ground. Oh, wait.... Hitler did. Did I mention that thousands of jobs are created by Bieber's music? Hitler never made music that inspired fourty million people to subscribe to him on twitter... what a b!tch that Hitler guy was. Oh, and JB never killed a paparazzo either. That dipsh!t took a walk into oncoming traffic. Dumbfvck had it comming, far as I am concerned. My opponent's source confirms this. And enough of this bullsh!t that "science" whatever voodoo black magic evil that nonsense is, has "proven" that JB sucks. Well guess what? FVCK SCIENCE! Until I hear Bill Nye say it, it's a lie -and that's the mother fathering truth. Mariah Carrey DESERVED to be insulted. Until she can be as sexolicious as Beyonce, she's worthless. And who gives a bloody sh!t about England? All they have is red-headed royals having stip parties when they come to Las Vegas. Worthless. My opponent has done nothing to prove that Justin Bieber is worse than Hitler. The outcome of this debate DEMANDS that you vote for Biebz. You just gotta' believe! Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org...(gay_slang) https://twitter.com...