only now is true, now is matter

Rebuttals"i have to imagine 5 seconds ahead of now, and i have to remember 5 seconds ago, not real"I agree with my opponent that one can imagine things in the future and remember things from the past. However, this does not mean that things in the past/future aren't real. As stated in my previous argument, we know for sure that dinosaurs were from the past and were, as physical beings, made of matter (http://www.history.com...) - therefore, we know that matter is from the past. My opponent admits that matter is real - one can therefore reasonably conclude that as matter is from the past, the past is reality say otherwise would be extremely ignorant. I ask my opponent to provide evidence that shows how matter didn't exist in the past, hence making the past "not real.""knowledge is the opposite of belief and belief goes to imagiantion, where as knowledge is memory of personal physical experience"It is incorrect to say that "knowledge is the opposite of belief." I can believe in something and know it to be true. For example, I believe and know that George Washington was the first president of the United States. I am unsure what you mean by "belief goes to imagiantion" - please explain this in your next argument. I suppose that I agree that "knowledge is memory of personal physical experience" - how does this statement advance your contention that "only now is true, now is matter" in any form?"to say reality is 5 seconds ahead of now is to say reality is 5 second ahead of reality"In order to make this assertion, one must assume that reality only occurs at one point in time. However, my opponent can provide no evidence for this claim. Once more, we know that many things in the past were 'real', and can assume through evidence and logic that many things in the future will be 'real'."the future and past IS informaiton, and i am born now today, as only now is real"My opponent has admitted that his contention is untrue by saying that the future and past are information. Once more, my above definitions affirm that true information is real - therefore, we can conclude that the future and past are real."the future and past is information, and informaiton is the opposite of matter, not real"Information is not the opposite of matter. Once more, my above definitions affirm that true information is real - therefore, we can conclude that the future and past are real.if we cut open a head and take out the brain, we cant poor the mind, thoughts out on the floor, so they are not Things they are nothingSomething doesn't have to be physically tangible in order to be real. For example, the concept that 4+5=9 is not physical, but is still true and hence real."1+0=1, why dosnt it equal 2?"The answer to this question is quite obvious. However, it does not advance my opponent's argument in any form."0 bananas are imaginary, and math is absolute"Congratulations on figuring that out.ConclusionOverall, my opponent has still failed to fulfill his Burden of Proof, as he provides no reasonable/logical evidence or proof for his claims. Meanwhile, I have successfully rebutted each of my opponent's statements. Unless my opponent can defend his statements and provide proof that affirms his contention, I am the winner of this debate.