Whoever accepts this is a better debater than Manatee.

Why am I bad?My opponent has given you the perfect rebuttal to my argument regarding an inability to speak. In fact, I must concede this point. There is no way that I can possibly hope to refute his claim that language does not provide a significant barrier to discourse. However, this only proves that he is a better debater. By eloquently pointing out the flaws in my argument, my opponent has shown that he possesses superior argumentative skills.Con then tries to tell you that manatees are very persuasive in leading people to their death. I would like to turn this argument against him: Remember that debate requires an opponent, and it cannot be done solo. By leading people to their deaths, manatees are not practicing persuasion. Rather, they are degrading debate by murdering potential opponents. This is not good debate practice. How can I debate if there's no opponent? Bananas do not do anything remotely equivalent to this. In fact, bananas are responsible for keeping people alive. Thus, bananas are practicing superior debate skills by expanding the pool of potential opponents. Manatees, on the other hand, and weakening debate by employing intimidation tactics.My opponent makes a fatal flaw in his response to my intelligence argument. The source that he cites is talking about the florida manatee. Remember that I am an amazonianmanatee. There are a number of reasons why amazonian manatees are inherently more stupid than florida manatees. Florida manatees naturally look more intelligent. Here is a picture of a Florida manatee: http://tinypic.com.... Here is a picture of an Amazonian manatee, which is clearly far less intelligent.http://seapics.com.... Amazonian manatees die a lot. According to wikipedia, "Their slow-moving, curious nature, coupled with dense coastal development, has led to many violent collisions with propeller-driven boats and ships, leading frequently to maiming, disfigurement, and even death." Obviously Amazonian manatees are not intelligent if they repeatedly commit suicide. Amazonian manatees live in the Amazon. However, there are also snakes in the Amazon. There are no snakes in Florida. Clearly, living in an area with snakes when you could live in a region without them is a dumb decision.Thus, my opponents argument that Manatees are intelligent does not apply to my specific species. We remain dumb as a box of rocks. Finally, my opponent brings up some arguments regarding this debate itself. First, he talks about how good my argumentation is. This is not, however, because I am a good debater. Rather, there is extreme bias toward the pro side in this debate. My arguments are effective because it is extremely obvious that my opponent is a better debater than I am. There is literally no way that I could lose this debate, because there are just too many arguments which prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that my opponent is one of the best debaters to ever walk the Earth.Then, con discusses how eloquent my speech is. In doing so, however, he reveals his complete and utter mastery of vocabulary. Here's a list of fancy words that he used. expound succint subtle acquiescing incessantly impeccable coherent good one pancakes like It is well known that a large vocabulary is a prerequisite to being intelligent. Thus, my opponent has just proven himself to naturally be smarter than I am. Logically, it follows that he is also a better debater. Debating involves using words, and con has proven that he has a better mastery of words than I do. So why is con better?There are, honestly, too many reasons to list. Instead of introducing one of the potential trillion arguments regarding my opponents superior debating skills, I will continue to cover the ones already examined in the debate.First, remember that my opponent is still undefeated. He has been on the website for sixteen hours, and is yet to lose a single debate. He claims that this is irrelevent, because he is lying about something on his page. He forgets, however, that lying is an essential part of debate. In fact, every single national debate champion in the history of the world has lied. Coincidentally, every single national debate champion in the history of the world has won the national championship. Coincidence? I think not. There is clearly a causal link between lying and winning debates.He then tries to tell you that he cannot speak. There are two problems with this argument My opponent has already established himself as a masterful liar. How do we know if he's actually a bannanawamajama instead of just a banana? It's likely that he's lying and is, in fact, just an ordinary banana. In this case, my argument on how effective of an orator he is would still stand. Like my opponent himself said, you do not need to speak in order to debate. I propose that my opponent would be effective at debating through the use of a harmonica. The obvious advantage to this is that harmonicas sound really nice, and would probably put the opponent to sleep. At this point, the opponent concedes, and con wins the debate. This extremely advanced tactic ensures that he never loses a debate, and thus is a superior debater than I. Finally, we have to examine the statistics that were presented. While we contain far more calories, it is absurb to believe that any individual could eat an entire manatee. Usually, I am full after a flipper or two. Bananas, however, are not filling at all. Thus, the average individual could eat more raw banana than raw manatee, thereby absorbing the most essential nutrients. While bananas pose a serious health risk, the potential side effects are not actually that painful. You just die. Nothing more to it. Death by manatee, on the other hand, is an extremely painful way to die. There's a video somewhere in the sidebar of Manatee performing The Almighty Excruciating Pain, which proves how painful manatees actually are.http://www.youtube.com... While fiber might make you s***, eating a manatee would mean actually eating s***which you then have to s*** again. The average manatee is carrying around almost 70 lbs of s*** in its bowels at any particular time. Gross. The lack of nutritional info for bananas does not show gross negligence and irresponsibility. Rather, it shows craftiness and humbleness. Both of these are essential debate skills which manatees do not possess. Back to con, and thanks for the debate. Never before have I engaged in such a difficult task as debating against someone with the level of skill which you possess.