Logan Paul Needs to Leave You tube

Logan Paul, while irritable, obnoxious, and as he puts it "chotchy", my opponent has listed no valid reasons why Logan Paul should be removed from YouTube Firstly, Logan is NOT a kids channel, contrary to popular belief. The minimum age to watch YouTube videos is 13 years old - with a parents permission. Although it would behoove Logan to post material that is appropriate for any age, Logan is technically not required to do so. Secondly, Logan Paul is entitled to say anything he wants as an American citizen, so long as it also complies with YouTube's guidelines. While there can be repercussions for the things you say, Logan Paul cannot be faulted for exercising his freedom of speech. Logan Paul has done very few things to the degree of which would offend the YouTube content rules. So few, that the only example I can think of (feel free to correct me if I am wrong) is the video of the dead body. My opponent has cited the song "Handlebars" and says that Logan Paul's song "I Can Ride Your Girl With No Handlebars" is a rip-off, a copy of that song. However, upon analyzing the song, apart from them having a similar title and chorus, there is little else in common. The beat and word flow are completely different between the two songs, except for the "handlebars" part. Even the phrasing and tones of the beginning of the songs are different enough to be warranted not a copy. Surely, Logan's song may have been inspired by the Flobot's song, but they are not one and the same. As for Logan's suicide video, it was at the very least a terrible lapse in judgment. While his apology sounds fake, we must take into account the fact that he is a stupid 22-year-old who does very stupid kids. He is in shock over the negative reaction to his horrible video, feels remorse, but is challenged with how to express himself. But let's say he posted the video purely for popularity and he is only apologizing so people will stop slamming him. This is not a reason to throw him off YouTube. Logan Paul, however thoughtless, has not truly done something so terrible that it requires him to lose his job. What has he done? Shown the hands of someone who has committed suicide? Acted in a disrespectful way toward the body, purely because he was shocked. Laughed nervously to relieve tension. Logan Paul had a natural human reaction, and put it online. Should he have marked it as 18 plus? Sure. Should the video have been taken down? Absolutely. But should he lose his livelihood based on one incident? No. YouTube's own policy states he is not liable to be terminated. The only things one can be removed for are: Repeated violations of the Community Guidelines or Terms of Service A single case of severe abuse (such as predatory behavior or spam) Accounts dedicated to a policy violation (hate speech, harassment, impersonation, etc) He has done none of these. He has only one known offense. It does not constitute an abuse of any person/s or the service itself, and he is certainly not dedicated to policy violation (despite whatever else he may do). In short, Logan should not be removed from YouTube because he has not done anything sufficient to warrant that punishment. The only legitimate violation (of which I am aware) is the suicide video. That is only one offense and although it may seem large, it is but one offense and a minor one considering the terrible repercussions he would suffer. Sources: https://support.google.com... https://support.google.com... https://support.google.com...