The Biblical God is more credible than the other religions' gods.

Sorry to be a little late,i'm a bit busy with school.Rebuttals-Yes you are correct, the Bible does speak of such events. These are all however in the Old Testament.But God had no problems with the Old testament as we can see in many parts of the New testament: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." Matthew 5:17"If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, leave that home or town and shake the dust off your feet.Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town." Matthew 10:14-15 "But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be." Matthew 24:37Also,most of these events were caused by your God,but he is omnipotent,he could've removed sin in a less painful way. Almost every time he removes sin from the world he breaks his own laws(Thou shall not kill),apart from being able to simply make the sin that he created(apart from knowing all the consequences) simply vanish. How would be he angry at people for sinning if he created sin?The new testament doesn't fulfil any prophecies because it was created to do so. I could say "Tomorrow a giant rock will fall from this building",and the next day throw that rock. That wouldn't be a supernatural prophecy,as it was forced. The New testament was created in a way it would fulfil the prophecies of the first. And the Bible being about love and grace is irrelevant to its credibility. Also,Jesus sacrifice wasn't meaningful. God is omnipotent,he didn't need to send his son to die,he could just make sin vanish. Also,his sacrifice would be meaningless because his pain was temporary and limited,and in 3 days he resurrects. Hell is eternal,unless he got to hell,the sacrifice had no meaning,because according to the bible he resurrects and gets back to heaven. Also,he even knew he was going to be killed. God created sin and he not being able to destroy it just makes he not omnipotent. What also makes him not omnipotent is he not being able to be around us. He didn't pay the price as i explained before and there was better ways to show grace and mercy. What about appearing in the clouds and say "I am the almighty living God and i love you all,and because of this i will forgive all your sins." and then cure every disease and remove sin from the hearts of people?-I would easily refute this because there are absolutely no requirements in order for God to love you.God does send people to hell,because he create them knowing they would go to hell in the future,because he knows every outcome of your decisions,and he knows what decisions you will make because he is omniscient. Also,if someone points a gun at you and tells you "Give me your money or you will die!" do you have any choice?Also,i don't think me parents you burn me for eternity for a something limited i did. If parents do punish their children,what i don't think it is a good way of teaching,they do it because they want them to learn that what they did is wrong,but there is no way to learn with hell,because it is eternal. Imagine that scenario,a kid is playing football and accidentally breaks his mom's vase,then his mom puts him inside the oven and turns it on,planning to keep him here for a undetermined time,while she says "I'm only doing this because i love you!".Would you agree with that? God does not remove people from hell. He gives you the opportunity to accept him and THAT is what removes you from hell. If he were to remove you from hell AFTER the fact, then there would be no point in faith, love, mercy,acceptance, salvation, redemption or any of this to begin with.So even after a lot of punishment he is not able to forgive people for limited errors,and keeps you there for eternity?It is not a choice,it is a threat. If he were to remove you after the fact you would learn that what you did was wrong,there is no point of keeping you there forever. That' s what a punishment is. Imagine if jail was eternal,even if what you did was only steal a candy?Would it be fair?- Simply put, we do not base our time on any other calendar and it's not because people were to lazy to change anything. The only reason it would not be used is because people wouldn't want to acknowledge the Lord.No,if anyone would do that,it is because state is secular. But because no one is demanding it,because it isn't needed and would be hard to put into effort we keep it. -I'm assuming that you meant to say, based on the persecution of the Christian belief? Otherwise your sentence is incoherent.What i meant is that Christians of the time wouldn't want to measure time based on someone who persecuted against Christians,the Roman emperor Diocletian[1].-If this theory doesn't disprove evolution, then why do we not see the intermediate fossil remains from the transition of apes to mankind?The Cambrian explosion has nothing to do with apes or mankind,it was a lot of time before. You are interpreting it wrong,it just means creatures evolved a lot faster,not that all creatures popped into existence. You will not find ape fossils or mankind fossils in the Cambrian era,because in that era there weren't even dinosaurs. Humans only appeared in the Quartenary period. And the Cambrian explosion doesn't prove God spoke animals into existence,that is a God of the Gaps argument. I provided a lot of different theories to why it would happen,all with evidence,but you just refuted and said "God did it".And apparently your God didn't spoke anything about the Bryozoa. As i said,it took millions of years,not 6 days. Also,genesis say that God spoke every kind at the same time,what doesn't happens,because we can see fossils never appear in the wrong geological layer predicted by evolution.-First off, mythological meaning imaginary, existing only in the imagination, i.e. fiction. The Bible is not mythology, so that's like comparing apples to oranges.That's a big claim,since before the bible people believed those stories,the same way people believe in Zeus,Odin,etc.Also,there was indeed a flood,because of the end of the ice age around 5000 B.C or because of a meteor[2],there are a lot of different stories telling the same thing,the difference is that different stories tell about different gods. What is more likely,that your God caused the flood,instead of hundreds of different gods from other flood myths,or that people though that it was their God because they didn't know the cause and exaggerated the story?Also,that site was found in 1959[3].Also,that site itself said that Ron Wyatt had no knowledge of geology and that geologists recognized that site as just a geological formation.-First of, the Bible does not have contradictions.I would be hard to all the contradictions in that image be only errors in context and i don't think you are able to explain all of them in their context. Also,wouldn't the word of God be understandable from any perspective?The word of God would be perfect after all,and he is omnipotent,so he would be able to create the Bible in a way it would be impossible to interpret it wrong. Also,there is a book written by an agnostic(Soham Jñana) called "100 revelations about Jesus" where he makes 100 revelations about Jesus he found doing his researches. He is also writing a series of books where he researches the entire life of Jesus,and shows how the bible doesn't tell a lot of his life,and sometimes even tells it wrong. He is researching the life of Jesus since 2005.This is the false doctrine of Predestination. "The Bible says, "The Lord"is not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance"If God was omniscient he would know every outcome of every of our decisions and would know what decisions we would take. If not,he is not omnipresent,so he lied about i,what is a sin. Strange is that the bible also says that it is impossible for God to lie,what is another contradiction,because he just lied about being omniscient,and about bot being able to lie. And even if he didn't lie about being omniscient,he would be lying about being omnipotent,since he said it is impossible for him to lie,but wait,he lied about not being able to lie. In any way,the bible does contradict itself,or lies. Also,if he knows who will disobey and who will go to not,why he created the ones he knew where going to disobey. Isn't it his fault?And God does show partiality,as he only helps people that believe in him,that is partiality and favoritism,like when he helps his people in Egypt,or when he helps his people to get to Canaan. Also,how do you know your God is the right one,what if to other religions,your hope is that Vishnu doesn't exist?You hold the BoP,you must show me what your religion has that the other ones don't.Sources:[1]:http://en.wikipedia.org... [2]:http://science.howstuffworks.com... [3]:http://www.noahsarksearch.com...