There exists at least one scientific flaw in the Qur'an

To win the debate, Con had to offer effective and well-supported refutations of the two cases. He didn't do that. The burden proof is on to me to provide two cases, but my opponent throughout the debate confused that with the BoP he had on his nonscientific objections, which he didn't defend or support but withdrew after each refutation.Con shifted goalposts many times throughout the debate. He first claimed that semen vesicles are between the ribs and the spinal cord and even provided a schematic diagram to prove that. After I later disproved that claim showing exactly where the seminal vesicles are, he claimed that the location is actually metaphoric and not meant to be exact(I'll respond to this below). Then on mountains, he mistranslated the verse and withdrew his argument after the refutation to make another one which was even more fallacious.Con also never provided scientific or peer-reviewed papers to support his objections. I've requested him three times so far to support his objections with such citations, but he completely ignored my requests. The "scientific" part in his previous round was actually from Britannica online, which is not a scientific source at all.1- Semen ProductionSurah 86:5-7 - Yusuf Ali's Translation: 'Now let man but think from what he is created! He is created from a drop emitted- Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs.'Whether we consider the fluid being described to be semen or the secretion of seminal vessels, both of them don't lie in the region described by the Islamic scripture. If this was just metaphoric, then let us study this metaphor. First of, it was not a common phrase like "head between shoulders." It's referring to human anatomy and specifying exact locations. Secondly, there is no beauty in the description used. It's just confusing and inaccurate. . My opponent's "metaphor" claim is in not at all a "well-supported" or "effective" refutation. Therefore, I win the debate just by this flawMy opponent then claims that my refutation fo Zakir Naik was by an argument from personal incredulity, even when he didn't adopt Naik's apologetic or showed the reader where I committed such a fallacy. I take it that my opponent is just trying to do some buck-belting to score a debate point.Then he claims that there is no such thing as justified arguments from authority. I find it shocking that he makes such a statement. If the authority is not related to the subject, say, I said "The Church says that seminal vesicles are not between the spine and the ribs" then I'm making a fallacious appeal to authority. But I used an actual authority on the matter.. "Fallacious arguments from authority often are the result of failing to meet at least one of the required two conditions (legitimate expertise and expert consensus) structurally required in the forms of a statistical syllogism."[1] 2- Earthquakes and MountainsCon used another argument which was more fallacious than the one before, supported by sections from Britannica online which do not say anything that remotely resembles what he is saying.He claims the formation of mountains somehow limits the occurrence of earthquakes. I consider this complete fabrication on my opponent's behalf, given that the sources he offered only talk of how the mountains are the causes of earthquakes. They don't say that mountains stop the earth from shaking. It is true that mountains are caused by plates pushing against each other, but that doesn't at all mean that mountains single the end of earthquakes. Many of the 10 largest earthquakes that ever happened occurred in mountainous regions[2]. No. 1: The great Chilean earthquake occurring 140 kms SSW of Concepción (Biobio), Chile, registered 9.5Mw – the largest earthquake ever recorded. (Andes mountain ra No. 2: The Prince William Sound earthquake occurring 33.2 kms SE of Mt. Goode (Alaska), U.S.A., registered 9.2Mw - the second biggest earthquake recorded in the 20th century. (Mt Goode) No. 6: The Ecuador earthquake occurring 138 kms W of Tortuga (Esmeraldas Provine), Ecuador, registered 8.8Mw. (Andes mountain range) Let me post again what the verse says:Surah 21:30 - Yusuf Ali's Translation: 'And We have set on the earth mountains standing firm, lest it should shake with them, and We have made therein broad highways (between mountains) for them to pass through: that they may receive Guidance.' - -I thank Con for this debate. It was really interesting.[1] Salmon, M. H. (2006). Introduction to Critical Reasoning. Mason, OH: Thomson Wadsworth. pp. 118–9.[2] webcitation.org/query?url=http://asc-india.org...