There is no misogyny. There are difference and diverse manners of treating females.

Good to have you back, sillydebater. It is always nice to start a reply with a civil greetings in joyful debates about pleasant topics. Regardless of you asking for some sort of evidence or not, it matters not. Evidence is needed to determine the truth or falsity of a matter that have physical or concrete nature that can be objectively observed, tested and confirmed, such as acts or events. Whereas, for matters that are determined by conscience or value judgment with grounds on subjectivity, there is no need for "evidence". You are confusing matters of facts(that require material evidence and empirical testing for confirmation) and values(that require only rational ideas). I will give you a fun example to further illustrate this point: If I rape some female, it is an objective fact(act/event) that has a physical and concrete nature, and thus can be objectively proved or disproved by means of testing and confirming. However, if I hold an opinion that it is OK, or even good to rape females, then there cannot be any means of obtaining evidence for or against to grade the opinion, since it is my evaluation of the act/event of rape as "good" or "OK" has its basis on my conscience and/or subjective value judgement that renders my interpretation of rape. In a less fun example, let us say someone likes chocolate ice cream and dislikes vanilla one. The objective fact is that he prefers the former over the latter, and this can be objectively confirmed by testing the person, such as give the person both ice creams and observe which one he takes more often. But let us say that the same guy says that he judges chocolate ice cream is more tastier(in other words, "better") than the vanilla. There is no way to test to find objective evidence for his claim that chocolate ice cream tastes better than the vanilla, because the very proposition is founded upon his subjective value judgment. Facts, acts, or events have physical, concrete nature, and thus are objective and absolute; opinions, beliefs and values have abstract and rational, and thus are subjective and relative. Do not confuse the two categories. For more examples, is killing jews good? Trump may not think so; Palestinians would love it. Same facts, different evaluations. Is serial-killing females good? Some people may not; serial killers disagree. Is honor-killing females justified? Some people may disagree; some other people agree. What about raping females? Some may dislike it; some love it, which is why rape is one of the universally and timelessly popular human activities. Now, who is to say what is "correct" or "incorrect"? That is the difference and diversity stemming from subjective value judgments and conscience. The more you ask for some sort of objective and absolute "proof" or "evidence" with regards to matters that are subjective and relative, the more you make fun of yourself. Next. If it is a fact that two things are different, what logically follows is that two things should be treated differently, meaning subject to different rules. You have committed a very basic fallacy and unsurprisingly you have failed to point out your own fallacy. I respectfully ask you to please review your thought before posting next time. Regarding your analogy between an electric car and a motorbike, I have no idea what kind of weird nation you live in, but where I live they are subject to different kinds of rules. This is another example where the objective, absolute fact(the difference between an electric car and motorbike) are interpreted differently in accordance with subjective and relative evaluations of different countries. To add another counterargument, children and adults are both humans. In fact, there are much more similarities between children and adults than there are between electric cars and motorbikes. Yet, do we subject children and adults to the same laws? No, not at all. Because in spite of the similarities and common grounds between kids and adults, there exist many great differences between the two groups, in terms of physical, chemical and biological level of development, hormones and so on, and thus they are judged and treated differently. Now, consider the differences between males and females: as I have mentioned: Numerous physical, physiological, chemical and biological differences exist between the two in spite of the objective and absolute fact that both belong to the same species. This alone provides enough objective, physical and absolute fundamentals upon which the justification of different treatments depending on sex is laid. Any argument that wants to treat the two in the same way has no grounds in or understanding of science, especially biology, at all. Indeed I have and apply different standards between males and females. My position has consistently supported for recognizing, respecting the differences, which confirmed by objective evidence and conducted by subjective, relative judgments, and embrace diverse treatments of females. Because of this fact, there is no "misogyny" but only differences and diversity. The hypocrisy and lie of yours is that you pretend to care so much about objective evidence as a basis for your argument but when the objective evidence and proof strikes your position like those airplanes did on 9/11/01, you suddenly ignore those evidence showing a myriad of differences and call for the same treatment. And you dare lie that you take objective evidence into your consideration? What is your real position? Please be consistent.