Biological Evolution across family, order, class...kingdom, etc.

Now my view is that Biological Evolution that Charles Darwin proposed is true and has been scientifically proven. Not only that, but I believe it is good science and on a personal note, believe it is compatible with my Christian religion. However, religion is not the topic, rather science. I believe evolution doesn't explain how life got here, but rather how we have so many different diversities of life. Now I will rebuttal the Punnet Square example to a degree. Now you can go and say what child will be born with what, but there are dominant and recessive traits. If a child is born with a recessive trait that doesn't show up in the chat child as dominant, then the child (though he may not show it physically) will most likely have that trait in his genes and will be able to pass it down to the next generation. So when it is proposed we are in a primate family with chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans, the point is that you can look at that these primates have no tails like us, but there are other monkeys who do. Here's a problem we might face from the evolution to being non tail having primates. There is a mutation or defect that some people have that gives them a tail. I haven't fully looked into the science of this, but my best guess is that it is a vestigial organ we are trying to slowly get rid of, but it may as well be a recessive trait that is still being passed on, but we are trying to weed it out. When the people who have this trait eventually die out, the tail trait will die out unless another mutation occurs to give us a tail. . http://www.slightlywarped.com... Now another vestigial organ is wisdom teeth. Some say this was used by ancestors to grind plant food back then. Now sounds good, but why would we be losing them? Our jaws are getting smaller due to natural selection. A mutation occurred where our jaws became smaller and nature favored the small jaws over the bigger jaws. Another example was explained on the Cosmos show. A brown bear civilization lived in the north pole where the modern polar bears are now. Brown bears where the only kind of bears we known (unless black bears came before the polar and brown. ) Anyways, The brown bear doesn't necessarily lose or add information to it's genome, but a mutation causes a mistake in the genome which gets fixed by replacing the codon pair or base with an already existing one. Even the smallest change or replacement can cause a change of good or bad proportions. In the case, the bear would receive a trait where it is an albino due to it's loss of pigment in it's fur color. They adapted to the winter snow environment and their camouflage allowed them to survive when it came to hunting for food. The brown bears did not get as much luck for hunting due to their brown fur which didn't blend in their environment. So the brown bears die out in the North Pole while their new polar bears carry out the new species. Now of course, this can eventually go out from one small step to change, but eventually when small mutations occur at a time, they will lead to noticeable changes to possibly newer creatures. This is like taking one step to work your way up to that mile your heading. So to answer your wolves part, if two grey wolves have children, mutations can occur and some of these mutations can make the dog deformed, look strong and fierce, or look cute and adorable. This was when the animals would breed with others to pass on the traits. So like mentioned with the bears, fur color pigmentation could be different. Size and looks will slowly be different. This is all part of an evolutionary process. When it comes to domesticated animals that we would own, that is evolution we control called, Artificial Selection. Natural Selection is letting nature run it's course and do the evolving process for you.