Gay Marriage

First, my opponent says "Pro also fails to see that one would be hard-pressed to get sperm from the semen banks. " and explains how difficult it is for a male to donate sperm and refers to one of his sources that says "Only 5 percent of all male applicants who apply to be a sperm donor meet the criteria to donate sperm". He also says that there are not many sperm banks (only 700 in the USA alone). All these facts are true, but 5 percent of male applicants being able to donate sperm is still plenty of sperm for the small amount of women who are lesbian/bisexual (2%). For example, if 5 out of 100 men were able to donate sperm, although it seems like a very small amount, that's still about 2,625,000,000,000 billion sperm. Now compare that number to the 2% of women who are lesbian/bisexual. Yeah, Con, I don't think there's going to be a "shortage" of sperm anytime soon. Second, Con states "in the long run, opposing gay marriage is beneficial not only to homosexuals themselves, but also the rest of the society as a whole". So, Con, are you saying that preventing people from getting married benefits them? Do you think that it's absolutely okay for you to be saying homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to marry when they have done NOTHING to hurt you? I said in round, 1 "I believe that people who take an extremist stance against a group of people who have done absolutely nothing to them is some what mentally demented and incapable of reasoning" and I am still sticking to that opinion. Lastly, Con responds to my question: "Picture your best friend, the one you've known since you were kids. Now, he just came out to you. What do you do? Do you accept him? Or do you disown him despite the fact that he has been your best friend for many years and has always been there for you? " with "I would still accept him. I would not disown him at all. Although I am against gay marriage and homosexuality in general because of their dangers, please do keep in mind that I would still continue to love homosexual people. Once again, what I want to do here is to fight the dangers of homosexuality for the betterment of homosexuals and the rest of the society in its entirety". This response make no sense at all considering throughout this entire debate, Con has said multiple times that homosexuality is a danger to society. Con, how could you truly accept your homosexual friend if you consider homosexuality to be slowing down the population? So before I let Con conclude, I would like to tell the voters this (Con may also say something to the voters as well if he desires). Why hate homosexuality? Are people walking around the streets having butt sex in front of you? No. Are gay guys breaking into your house and butt raping you until you admit you like it? NO. Gays aren't messing with you so why mess with them? Why mess with their right to marry? What would you do if someone wouldn't let you get married because you're different? Oh and quick question to anyone that believes God is against homosexuality, if he's so against it then why did he put G-Spots in the anus' of men? I would like to thank Con for this amazing debate. I consider him a very civilized and sophisticated debater and I like the way he used evidence to support almost all of his statements. Thank You, Con