The Bureaucracy violates the "separation of powers" of the three branches of government

Thank you Con, I look forward to this debate. My argument will be summed up like this: The Bureaucracy is part of the Executive Branch of the United States Government, but exercises the rights of all three branches. First let us establish what "Separation of Powers" is and where it came from. "The Founding Fathers were heavily influenced by French philosopher Charles Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu when drafting the Constitution, most notably in connection with the separation of powers." --- http://www.americassurvivalguide.com... The "separation of powers" known to most Americans, is that established in Articles 1, 2, and 3 of the Constitution of the United States. This is the separation of legislative, executive and judicial powers. Now let us examine the Bureaucracy. In the U.S., the Bureaucracy is part of the Executive Branch. What does that mean? It means that it is composed of extensions of the president"s power. These extensions come in three types: Government Corporations, Government Agencies, and Executive Departments (whose heads make up the Cabinet). "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." Constitution of the United States, https://www.archives.gov... Therefore, these groups are charged with the executive duties; that is to enforce laws. The right of the Legislative Branch that is infringed by the Bureaucracy is law making. Law making belongs solely to this branch. "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives." Constitution of the United States The right of the Judicial Branch that is infringed by the Bureaucracy is the right to judge. This right belongs to the judicial branch alone. "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office." Constitution of the United States. Now let it be examined what the Bureaucracy actually does. It makes regulations to supplement and enforce law passed by Congress, and then takes offenders to court. So, you might ask, "What it wrong with that?" The real question is, "What is right with that?" The answer is virtually nothing. Let us examine what they do right, that is trying to enforce the laws. That is a good thing right? Yes, but how they go about it is what is wrong. Sure, some of the regulations they make they have real authority to make, Congress usually grants them some form of discretionary authority. But they over step this authority and start making supplemental regulations, a fancy phrase for new laws that we have to obey, but that have not come from Congress. Now that is bad, but what is worse is that when they take you to court, it is not really a court. Offenders are taken to so called Administrative Law Judges, who are HIRED by the Bureaucracy. That means that not only will justice not be done, but that illicit judges in the Executive Branch are making rulings. Even if all this was done legally, it would still be a downright infringement of the separation of powers. I rest my case.