We should stop the Whiteman for their continued domination of the world!

Hello and thanks for starting this debate! I love controversial debates, so this will be really interesting! I would like to begin by stating definitions: White Supremacy: "a person who believes that the white race is better than all other races and should have control over all other races" Black Power: "The use of political and economic power by African-Americans especially as part of a social movement to promote equality and racial justice in the 1960s" Please refer to the Miriam Webster online dictionary if you have any issues with the given definitions. Now, I would set up my arguments into three contingencies, and then seamlessly sew them together with a conclusion. http://www.censusscope.org... Contingency A: Now, please use the link provided above to fully unravel my first contingent. While the topic is extremely vague, and extremely biased, I believe I have some arguments that can clear things up. First, the "Whites" continue to dominate the world, mainly because the majority of the developed world is white. Of course depending on you definition of "dominate", which I do not really think needs to be defined for this debate. Contingency B: This will be a spot where I do a couple rebuttals to your arguments, but I believe I can do this since you did not layout the rules before the match. "The have nukes to wipe out mankind! " If you are referring to the major world super powers, then yes, I suppose you could be correct, however, you would only be correct in assuming that there are "whites" in these nations. However, all nations that are also superpowers have a fair amount of diversity. Except for the Asian countries, which also have nukes. Those countries are not run by "whites" and therefore, your argument is invalid. Also, Theoretically, the president of the United States has the power to launch a nuclear missile, when he feels like he needs to, this power is know as executive privilege. Can you guess the race of the president as of right now? That's right! he is African American. Next, "And to add to this. The white man has shed more blood than any other race in the history of mankind". This can simply be argued. The Chinese population, (which are an amazing group of people if you look at all the diversity their people have been through of the course of thousands of years) have had their fair share of blood shed. Let's look at the 40,000+ people vlad the impaler killed. Now, don't get me wrong. I believe this argument is invalid 100% because I know that the fact that skin color and ethnicity do not make you a bad person, or a connection to murders. It's somewhat racist, and it is ignorant. For my third contingency, I would like to overall sum up my arguments. As developing nations develop, so does their populations. As the white population expanded, so did the amount of land they owned. This is true because at one point, Great Britain owned the majority of the world, including parts of Africa, and much of India. To say things like, "The white man has shed more blood than any other race in the history of mankind", has no evidence, and therefore is just an opinion. Thank you, I am finished.