Chuck Norris Is The Ultimate Character In Mugen

As my opponent has not defined Ultimate, I will proceed to define it myself, and, to ward off any semantical claims, I will then destroy every argument he could have on the word ultimate. Ultimate[2] - 1. Being last in a series, process, or progression: Obviously, Chuck Norris is not the last character in Mugen, as there are others created after him, and others that, in alphabetical order, come after him as well. This particular definition is negated. Ultimate[2] - 2. Fundamental; elemental: Chuck Norris is clearly not universally fundamental to Mugen. Mugen was around before the character Chuck Norris had been entered into the user's database. In fact, Mugen comes with no characters but Kung Fu Man, which dictates that Mugen is able to run without Chuck Norris. This particular definition is negated. Ultimate[2] - 3. a. Of the greatest possible size or significance; maximum: Chuck Norris is not the greatest size, as, in my opponent's own video, there was a character larger than Chuck Norris given. He is neither the universal greatest significance, as the significance of Chuck Norris varies from user to user. Some may 'need' him, and some will not. This particular definition is negated. Ultimate[2] - 3. b. Representing or exhibiting the greatest possible development or sophistication This is most likely what my opponent was going for. To be honest, it is qite easy to beat, as all I need to do is list a character that can defeat/tie Chuck Norris, thus validating that character's higher development/skill. And, since ultimate implies that there can be only one supreme fighter, if another was to tie Chuck Norris, the resolution would be negated. I choose WeeGee[1]. He has no hitboxes, he can not die, and he automatically kills his opponent. This particular definition is negated. Ultimate[2] - 3. c. Utmost; extreme As this is entirely subjective my opponent loses. Why Because, it is the BoP to prove that Chuck Norris is invariably the extremest character in all of Mugen, and as this is purely subjective, my opponent loses, as it varies from person to person, and he would have to prove that Chuck Norris is INVARIABLY the most extreme character. This particular definition is negated. Ultimate[2] - 4. Being most distant or remote; farthest Since this definition doesn't actually -make- sense in the context of the resolution, this type of definition loses. This particular definition is negated. Ultimate[2] - 5.Eventual Now, at first glance, it may seem this is a strong argument for my opponent. However, it is not, as The implies that, since it is in context with this particular resolution, we were specifically waiting for this exact type of character, and this version of Chuck Norris. Now, since not everyone wasn't, this argument is negated. And, as no one in particular knew beforehand what exactly Chuck Norris in Mugen would look like, and what version for Mugen, and so on and so forth, with many specifications, this definition fails. This particular definition is negated. In conclusion, I hope my opponent makes a valiant attempt to rebut my arguments, though I do not expect him to succeed. Resolution negated. Sources: [1] http://www.youtube.com... [2]http://www.thefreedictionary.com...