The SN 1006 Supernova caused when World War Two occurred

And now onto my opening arguments. Argument One: General ArgumentPremise One: Events occurring cause time to move forward. Premise Two: Time moving forward causes events to occur. Conclusion One: Any event causes any subsequent event. Premise Three: The SN-1006 supernova occurred before World War Two. Conlusion Two: The SN-1006 supernova caused when World War Two occurred. Defense of Premise One:The antithesis of this statement is that when events occur it does not mandate time's movement forward. As time is an ordered sequence of events in which the occurrence of one mandates (or causes) the occurrence of the next, it would be absurd to suggest that by allowing the following events to occur, any event's occurrence does not move time forward. Defense of Premise Two: When time moves forward, events occur in their ordered sequence. To claim that the occurrence of these events does not cause the occurrence of the subsequent ones is deny the basic properties of time and events, namely that immediately subsequent events follow based on their basic properties. Defense of Premise Three:This is essentially undeniable. World War Two began in 1939, the supernova was observed in 1006. Not much contention here. Argument Two: Argument from PhysicsA "Planck time" is the name given to the shortest possible unit of time, derived from the Planck length. [1] Let us use the term "Planck frame" to refer to the arrangment of everything in the universe at the time of one Planck frame. Now let us define an "event" as the change between one Planck frame and the immediately subsequent one. We can then think of time as an ordered sequence of these events. Premise One: When an event occurs, it mandates the existence of the Planck frame it changes into. Premise Two: When a Planck frame comes into existence, it mandates the occurrence of the event changing it. Conclusion One: When an event occurs, it causes the immediately subsequent event. Premise Three: The subsequent-event-causing property of events does not terminate after one iteration. Conslusion Two: When an event occurs, it causes all subsequent events. Premise Four: World War Two and the SN-1006 supernova are sequences of events. Premise Five: World War Two is subsequent to the SN-1006 supernova. Conclusion Three: The SN-1006 supernova caused when World War Two occurred. Defense of Premises One and Two:As the event is merely a change of Planck frames, so by definition the frame following it must come into existence. By extension, when this Planck frames comes into existence, the next event in the sequence will occur after one Planck time. To deny this is to deny the progression of time itself. Defense of Premise Three:If we carry out the logical conclusion of premises one and two, we find that, just as the first domino knocks down the whole chain, the event's ability to cause the subsequent event also causes the event subsequent to that one, and to that one, and so on. Defense of Premise Four:As these two occupied periods of time, they are not "events" as we have defined them. However, any period of time can be summarized as a section of the sequence of events that is time, and so they are both smaller sequences of events, and the properties of events can be likewise applied. Defense of Premise Five:Once again, historical fact. Conclusion:Because any event moves time forward, and time moving forward causes any event, all events cause all subsequent events. Therefore, the SN-1006 supernova caused when World War Two occurred. [1]. http://astronomy.swin.edu.au...