BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
God does not exist. Prove your stance.

So you have done no more than to attack the messenger to reveal your own flawed logic by doing so. Not only have you done this you have not even comprehended the question put forward as you have not even at least tried. I am starting to think that masterful IQ level has problems with comprehension. Or is it that you are another monotone abuser that hide behind apathy? Unintentionally or intentionally within your own confluence. so let us try this again, shall we? Could an existence creator have unconditional love if free will was taken from its own creation "us", by coming out from behind an eclipse,"death" as to crucify it's own free will? Why not even try to explain to me what you believe free will actually is. Or have you no belief of that as well?
God does not exist. Prove your stance.

You can define me as a rationalist if you want. I asked for an insight into your own beliefs, but you haven't touched upon them. I will try and answer all your questions. Though some are of your questions are poor. 1] You have a paragraph where you ask for what I believe my starting point was. As you were unspecific I will answer with: My starting point was in my mothers womb. 2] You ask if I think I exist, you then assert I believe in nothing: Of course I think I exist and I don't even believe something came from nothing unlike you. 3] You ask if an existence creator could have unconditional love if free will was taken from its own creation. Well clearly not if that existence creator allows people to be born with birth defects and in some instances born to die in the first year of their life. 4] The rest is dribble. If your second round is as poor as your first round then I'll remake this debate with someone else. I'd like to ask a few questions. 1] Why do you believe in God? 2] What traits does your God have? Does he know all and is he he all powerful? 3] How old do you think the Earth is?
God does not exist. Prove your stance.

ag|nos"tic [aɡG2;n;4;st=8;k] NOUN a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God. synonyms: sceptic " doubter " questioner " doubting Thomas " challenger " scoffer " cynic " unbeliever " disbeliever " non-believer " rationalist " nullifidian ADJECTIVE relating to agnostics or agnosticism. synonyms: sceptical " doubting " questioning " unsure " cynical " unbelieving " disbelieving " non-believing " faithless " irreligious " rationalist " nullifidian -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So this is you is it please correct me if you do not fit these criteria in any manner or form? so, in other words, you are a fence sitter or for the sake of it an undecided atheist or an undecided religious person. Where are your own foundations or don't you have any starting point for your own existence. Or don't you even believe that you exist? there is nothing in nothing and there is no excuse to believe in nothing as you still believe in nothing. So is nothing something as for the point of existence or even the starting letter of this conversation. What was it again A for agnostic? If you can answer this one question I would thank you from the bottom of my heart and be forever be indebted to your masterful IQ level. Could an existence creator have unconditional love if free will was taken from its own creation "us", by coming out from behind an eclipse,"death" as to crucify it's own and our own free will? Free will; I don't know you. I only know of you. If I ever knew myself at all. Say what you mean and mean what you say is not mean it's meant from the heart. Sometimes we need to be cruel to be kind, but don't forget the golden rule. The golden rule; What you wish upon others, you wish upon yourself.
God does not exist. Prove your stance.

I'm looking for a rational religious person to talk to. If you are not rational or have an I.Q of less than 80 then you should not accept this debate. Rules: 1. No Bible quotes are allowed as Bible quotes do not prove anything. 2. No insults. 3. State your views. 4. dsjpk5 is not allowed to vote on this debate, he a a known vote spammer and his votes don't mean jack. If rule 4 is broken Moderators will be contacted. If any other rules are broken, points should be deducted at the voters discretion. Keep it as concise as possible we don't want to hear a rant we want substance. If you ain't got any then don't accept. My views: I don't think a God exists. Using 'God did it' is the same as saying 'it's magic'
It is possible for an atheist to have a consistent morality of any kind

My opponent has outright lied to the viewers and readers. We do not both agree on his 2nd premise that atheists can only be moral by pure coincidence or his 3rd contention that when theists act immoral it is because they're acting as atheists. I do disagree with my opponent's proposition that sociopaths and psychopaths won't feel bad because of religion, precisely because these people are marked by an inability to feel remorse, guilt, and empathy altogether. Giving them false punishments won't work by the very nature of their mental illness, they won't feel remorse because they don't relate to emotion. Even if you were to convince someone to do good based on heaven and hell, that doesn't give credence to the truth of the story. You can make children behave well with the idea of Santa Claus, but being that he is not true you cannot claim that Santa Claus is the reason for their moral system. In that instance Santa (like religion) is only a tool to help guide someone's moral compass, meaning whatever is true about our morality is in the fact that we get it from elsewhere. All of this lends credibility to the fact that atheists can be perfectly good, consistently moral, people without a religion just as people can be consistently bad with one.Also, my opponent has not attacked my case.
It is possible for an atheist to have a consistent morality of any kind

Things we agree on: A theist can be immoral. An atheist can BE MORAL at times, or by pure coincidence all the time. Most theists do not follow their religion's moral code fully, and when acting in this atheist manner can be immoral The single factor we disagree on: Without fear of eternal regret and pain, one can truly feel 'bad' for doing something if they are a psychopath/sociopath I concede that I meant I think I am a sociopath in many ways, not a psychopath my apologies for mixing terms up but this doesn't win my opponent any votes in itself.
It is possible for an atheist to have a consistent morality of any kind

I like to think that I'm a pretty decent guy, so I accept my opponent's case. Though I fear that with the resolution he's applied he may have actually dug his own grave, so to speak. Acceptance round"there is a pure impossibility of having a moral compass of any kind and be atheist at the same time, after all no-one will punish you if you're not caught"~RationalMadmanThis debate will not be centered on the existence of secular morality, but on the concept of whether atheists can choose what is good (or even know how to choose what is good) and act as morally sane individuals. The above statement implies that atheists know very well the difference between right and wrong, but there is just nothing stopping them from picking the wrong choice because they feel there is no punishment in the afterlife. In this debate, I will be attempting to show the readers 3 very important points and prove them over my opponents stance on the issue of morality/moral codes in atheists. 1) Atheists can have consistent moral codes and exhibit consistent moral behavior.2) Belief systems don't mirror behavior. 3) Punishment is not the standard for morality.Thanks for the challenge madman, look forward to your next round.
It is possible for an atheist to have a consistent morality of any kind

UltimateSkeptic had a debate with me over Secular Morality that I lost because it is impossible to assert moral absoluteness over moral relativity.Then I realised the reason I lost is because the fundamental flaw I find in secular morality isn't that it is incorrect in and of itself but rather that there is a pure impossibility of having a moral compass of any kind and be atheist at the same time, after all no-one will punish you if you're not caught (according to atheists).I have made this challenge out of good-hearted hope that UltimateSkeptic will perhaps have the decency to redo our debate on a more 'fair' playing field.
The Smart Snack Law does not promote "smart snacks".

Actually, it costs aproximately $1.50 more to eat healthy food. I fail to see what the economic state of the U.S. has to do with state's rights, federalism, education, or health, but spending has risen billions and billions of dollars in the past decade, causing the U.S. to plummet further into debt. Regardless, this law has absolutely NOTHING to do with spending or cutting spending, it simply requires schools to follow ridiculous and utterly wrong guidelines. It has not given schools more money to provide students with healthy lunches and snacks, but it should have since healthier food costs more than junk food.
The Smart Snack Law does not promote "smart snacks".

The Smart Snack Law, also known as Michelle Obama's infamous "school lunch menu", has actually made school lunches less healthy. The law has banned caffeinated sodas, replacing them with their diet counterparts, which generally contain aspartame, an extremely toxic substance which has been known to cause numerous health issues, and may damage brain cells as well as cause seizures. Does this sound beneficial for our students? Additionally, Arizona Tea, which contains zero calories and all-natural ingredients has been replaced by Brisk Tea, which is stock full of artificial ingredients and harmful dyes. Instead of the vending machines having pop-tarts, which are more nutritional than candy bars, they are now filled with cookies, neon-red artificial chips, and sugary cereal treats. Instead of selling natural fruit snacks or healthier alternatives to candy bars, the law would rather have schools sell sugar-coated gummy worms, artificially dyed foods, and "low-fat" ice cream. Most of the snacks in vending machines are excellent sources of high fructose corn syrup and caramel coloring. These are what the government calls "smart snacks"? This doesn"t even begin to address the fact that the Smart Snack Law is blatant government overreach. The tenth amend states that state governments have control over public schools, not the federal government. The law is a direct violation of the concept of federalism, as is the dreaded Common Core (which benefits the corporate monster Pearson, but I will not go into that). In summation, the Smart Snack Law is promoting sugary, artificial snacks and regulates certain foods not based on whether or not they're natural, but based on calorie, sugar, and fat content. The law is misguided and does not actually require schools to sell natural, healthy foods.
Fancy Polite English Gentlemens Rap Battle

Yo ho! What do we have here? A pirate who thinks he can rhyme Why does this happen all the time? My opponent wishes to insult my honor With his insinuations in our affront war But chaps, who is he kidding? My sister and him? He's dreaming. And what's with his tastes, this crazy Bench? He hates the Irish and the French And lusts after a red head girl (whom he's never met) Who's half those races, and also Jewish? Absurd from the outset. And this man tries to insult my honor? How cruel! Come to me post haste my dearest brother, I doth challenge the to a duel! I'll show the whole world the better swordsman between us two, I am a fencing master,champion, rulder! So hint: It is not you. Indeed, I'm fantastic, aristocratic, and look handsomely My opponent is none of these, and he wants to go against me? Hah! Let him try, and watch his insults drop lower, (by the way, on this I bet 240 Pence) than his win ratio when the voting for this round has commenced! So my dear friend, please leave the pipe smoking and rapping to me, Go back to that old weekly stupid program where you're the king, Go anger some blubbering idiots (like Historygenius, make his tear ducts drench) And watch me sit my fine fancy British behind down on your noble family, Bench.
Fancy Polite English Gentlemens Rap Battle

Yes it is true, I do have a fancy for plundering, buccaneering, and of course piracy. The first pirates raided the ships of the Spanish Main the Spaniards so wicked you should hit one with your cane! Yes many of them later turned on the English with their taxes on whiskey, cookies, and fish. But the glamor of pirates shall always be seen, even if they didnt have the best hygiene My devilish opponent makes a treacherous claim in saying that my nephew isnt at the top of the game Enrolled in Oxford, he is top of his class But he isnt listed as a Bench, hes registered as Jazz! My nephew has a thing for that kind of music, I myself prefer classical, but my nephew oh he hates it. He instead has a taste for Jazz and the blues thats why he goes by the name Jazz, you silly goose! I would love to take your offer, I enjoy a good smoke I'll bring the drinks, Ive got plenty of coke! Afterwards I wish to see your lovely sister Id like to show her how much that ive really missed her ;D As for my ancestors, yes they were crusaders and though their role was small, so too were their haters You can find them in history, but look for the signs You'll never see them fighting up in the front lines My look at the time, its almost midnight! If I dont feed my dog soon then im in for a bite. Still better treatment then what ill get from my wife But I'll remind her I can get away with ending her life Theres so much to say and im already out of time Damn the Irish and the French, theyre no better then swine Protestants and Muslims, I'll see thee in hell Where the only show on TV is 'Saved by the Bell' ;D
Fancy Polite English Gentlemens Rap Battle

Oh dear! I'm late, I'm late, for a very important date! It seems I'm almost out of time to finish this debate! But regardless, my opponents dedication I do appreciate. And I do declare, what a wonderful saturday morning! What are my opponents plan for his weekending? Does his avatar suggest that he plans to pirate joyfully? Hmm perhaps I should warn the music industry... I digress, but will say it is unfortunately impossible for my friends nephew to be top of class at Oxford Because I am actually a professor of literature there and can confirm no student known as bench, not that I care! Who would like to join my for a nice smoke? I love puffing pipe tobacco until I choke! And sit chatting about philosophy, religion, politics, any subject that to speak about women are unfit ;) Given that last statement, I suppose the truth is unfortunately that my good friend Lord Bench cannot discuss with me. I'm just kidding with my good friend! Lord Bench is clearly quite a man! Why else would he spend such time in the whorehouses? I would not understand! The extensive libraries at Oxford have allowed me to gain access to images of my opponents ancestors in the crusades! As you can see: http://www.wle.com... , their contribution was huge! Without the noble bench's, we could not sit on our backsides after a day of abuse! So I thank my opponent, and I thank his family for their past! Indeed without them, MY family would've had none to sit on at last! My opponents rhymes are nice, I do admit so I shake his hand and thank him for his refusal to quit!
Fancy Polite English Gentlemens Rap Battle

So you like fish and chips, and going to the harbor to look at some ships. Which is your favorite, a steamer or a schooner? If we finish eating we can go look at them sooner! I also used to wear powdered whigs Back when my hair was as brittle as twigs But rather then go with whigs, I prefer top hats They make me feel fancy, like I own exotic cats You say you're a Jew, who likes the old lady and the shoe It just so happens my wife loved that story too she is no longer with me, we had a divorce, its because she gained weight and was as fat as a horse! God save the queen, yes indeed Did you hear about her most recent deed? She actually decided to go and visit the Princess of Wales, and she gave her royal diamonds, (they were actually from Zales!) Reminds me of the time I wrote to my nephew in Oxford, top of his class, but he says he's so bored. He actually claims it isn't challenging enough, So I said "Be a woman if you want your life to be tough!" I guess my favorite hobby is gentleman's football, if you want to have a game, just give me a call. I don't like that kind that Americans play, I prefer the other version, Ill play that every day! My family name is bench, its actually Hebrew People tease me about it, but I say "oh you ;D" My lineage is thanks to the third crusade When Europe beat Saladin, boy we made him pay! Do come again, I would love to hear more! Did I tell you how my brother used to hunt wild boar? I would go with him but I don't care much for a hunt, Unless what we were hunting was a defenseless little runt.
Fancy Polite English Gentlemens Rap Battle

Tally-ho, my jolly good chap! I do dearly hope you enjoy my rap. I will answer your questions it is true, Then ask my own and learn more about you! My favorite dish is fish and chips, I say we eat them at a harbor, watching ships. I like to wear powdered wigs, and go fox hunting, and spend some quid. I am indeed a beloved Jew, My favorite tale is the old lady and the shoe My favorite ice-cream is tea, oh how I love my fancy tea... I'll pour you some fine Indian tea, and we can calmly discuss the keys to all the issues we face today, indeed we must discuss them, God save the queen! Oh, and please do pardon me! I have been speaking most rudely! My name is Sir Reginald of Trent and what about you, my noble bench? What is your favorite hobby, dish, and game? And dear sir, do tell me all about your family name! Your history, heritage, and origins you see, and if you wish, you can learn the same from me! So goodbye for now dear lad, but please do not be sad for I shall be coming to speak again hence and I shall bring with me a shiny sixpence!
Fancy Polite English Gentlemens Rap Battle

Pretty straight forward, 2000 characters, ill get us started Good day! hello! how do you do? im here for one reason, to entertain you! I shall not be dirty, I shall not be mean. In this rap battle, I will only be clean! To my opponent, whoever they may be May I offer you, a nice crume brulee? If that doesnt suit you, just name your favorite dish, Ill serve you anything, unless youre Irish ;D After you eat, we can chit and we can chat Maybe exchange some advice on wearing fancy hats Then afterwards, if we happened to be bored We can go throw some rocks at some protestant whores! My favorite landmark is Trafalgar Square, My favorite childrens tale? The tortise and the Hare. But enough about me, tell us about you. Are you English or Welsh, a Catholic or a Jew?
Dc would Destroy marvel in an All out War

But Galactus can survive for a very long period of time before he needs another planet to consume. Therefore, even if he did end up destroying all planets and universes possible, this doesn't mean that Galactus would be weak. It would take him weeks before he needed another planet to consume and this gives him sufficient time to kill antimonitor due to his impenetrable armour. You fail to understand where the Beyonders are based which is really a huge misconception that a lot of people get confused with. The Beyonders are in such a mysterious place that nobody (other than themselves) are able to get there. Not even omnipotent characters (excluding TOAA) can get there. The Beyonders are able to inflict damage upon people without them even seeing them. Let alone being able to attack them. Kismet ic referred to as the equal to eternity in terms of ability but ability =/= experience. Eternity is infinite and didn't have a birth place [1]. Kismet had a birth place and parents and is fairly new in terms of creation into the DC univere giving her very little experience vs. Eternity who has been in multiple battles with omnipotent characters (and beaten some of them) [1]. Lucifer morningstaris powerful enough but wouldn't do so. Yahewah is a character that is in all universes both Marvel and DC (and possibly our world). Yahewah is omnibenevolent and does not EVER take sides. Yahewah strongly discourages violence in all circumstances and does whatever possible to prevent it. Given that Yahewah is also a Marvel character, Yahewah would not engange in combat with Marvel and would not allow Lucifer Morningstar to fight [2]. Living Tribinal is giften with the abilities of omnipotence, omniscience and perfection. The Spectre has many flaws (which my opponent fails to acknowledge) and would be easily defeated. I don't care how powerful Dr.Manhattan is because we know for a fact that he isn't omnipotent or immortal [3]. This means that even if he is able to kill molecule man he will die with him and my opponent completely ignores my argument for this. TOAA represents whoever is writing the book Marvel or DC. That is why he can never die. It is physically impossible because if TOAA dies in the battle then the creator of the battle dies. That is how TOAA works. This fight will not even exist if TOAA dies since the book cannot be written or published. Therefore, TOAA is stronger than The Presence who is not supported in this way. The Gauntlet is limitless. If you have the capacity (ie. omnipotence) and use it, your power will go beyond omnipotence which is impossible for a human to comprehend but it is possible if an all powerful character weilds and all powerful weapon. With the infinity gauntlet you can do ANYTHING including killing the great evil beast and The Presence (assuming that an extremely strong character wields it) [4]. Sources[1] http://marvel.com...;[2] https://en.wikipedia.org...;[3] https://en.wikipedia.org...;[4] https://en.wikipedia.org...;
Dc would Destroy marvel in an All out War

Very well, very well done indeed. Here's the problem though, if Anti monitor can't consume Galactus (witch I never said) I said that Galactus can be weakened by Antimonitor by destroying all planets and universes and make Galactus weak, maybe not kill him but weaken him and he wouldn't stand a chance. Plus Anti monitor can grow as big as Galactus The Beyonders are powerful and maybe mr.myxtyplx can't do much but combined with Bat mite and more Imps I know they will stand up to beyonders and destroy them. Maybe Michael can help them too Kismet is Dcs equal to Eternity, what stops her from doing the same to him. Lucifer morning star is powerful enough to kill Franklin Richards, think of this It's DC vs Marvel, Yahewah is on Dc Witch means that he wouldn't care if Lucifer brings on his power at maximum level, to destroy Marvel. The Spectre is known to be Living Tribunals equal from Dc, but if you don't think he can equal him, witch I think he would, I bring in the Primal Monitor witch would be more than enough for LT. Dr.Manhattan says he isn't omnipotent, but he has impressive feats, now moleculeven man might get some shots here and there but Dr.Manhattan can multiply and expand his size. If Dr. Manhattan fails though I bring in the emotional spectrum enteties, With Nekron and the Life entity. So what if TOAA represent a writer, he's still a character, I mean why would that matter. Are you saying because he's a real human being he oviously wins or because he writes for Marvel? He has no power over DC then. Isn't there more writers in Marvel than Stan and Kirby? Anyways, Just because it represents a writer it doesn't mean they aren't equal in power The infinity stones and Gauntlet is a little overated, if you think about it all of the powers it contains, should not affect things like Eternity or Living Tribunal since their power is beyond multiverse. The great evil beast is darkness itself I don't think beyonder or whomever youbring can take it on due to him being the equivalent dark side of Precence. Sorry I can't copy and paste the site, my phone is acting stupid, but I hope you look more into the characters I named.