Atheism Evolution vs Creation by God

THE VIDEOS: I already debunked your explanation about currents. The petrified trees are standing up within the sediment layers that are claimed to be formed over the course of millions of years. Were they formed by erosion/volcanoes or millions of years of Evolution? pick one. Erosion doesn't actually explain them though. e"ro"sion əG2;r!3;ZHən/ noun the process of eroding or being eroded by wind, water, or other natural agents. "the problem of soil erosion" the gradual destruction or diminution of something. https://www.google.com... Not the gradual build up of sediments, but the gradual destruction of sediments. Volcanoes would not have been able to separate the sediment layers like water would, so volcanoes are also out of the question. But let's say the sediment layers WERE formed by volcanoes... That would be to say that they DIDN'T form from billions of years of evolution. So like I said, pick one. If you pick volcanoes that destroys your geologic columns. But you can't pick volcanoes cause they wouldn't separate the sediment layers. You can't pick billions of years of evolution, because that doesn't explain the standing petrified trees. So you're stuck with sediment layers formed by a LOT of water. This is the only way to explain both the separation of sediment layers and the standing petrified trees. That rock you showed me is TOTALLY comparable to the 45-50 foot tall rock found in Saudi Arabia that is so big you can walk in to the spit made in the rock. I mean, the rock in your picture is HUGE! And look at all the erosion all around the rock!.... Oh wait, that's just grass. (ps. this comment is completely sarcastic.) Huge erosion is found all over the Split Rock. Rocks around it are flattened by erosion (as shown in the video) giving clear evidence that water once gushed out of this rock and spit it in half. This was found in the same place as the burnt mountain with carvings of cows (Egyptian god), an altar, and ancient Hebrew writing on the stones. Logic tells that something like the story in the book of Exodus actually happened. All of your guesses are pretty ridiculous and have no historical record, or legend to back them up. I gave the examples to show that we have evidence that supports the stories found in the scriptures. Why do you want so badly not to believe that something like that could happen? Instead you make up a collection of "possibilities" that hold no historical record of support whatsoever. (ps. no such weather patterns are recorded over the Red Sea that make anything of what you are saying "naturally" possible.) Also, in your list of possibilities, you have decided to switch from the gradual rising of the ocean floor to a very quick and huge natural disaster that has never been recorded anywhere. Faulty chariots being thrown into the Sea would be a good explanation maybe if there wasn't found with them horse and human bones. Why are they there? Quantum: No theory can count in support of your argument or as a rebuttal to mine. I want facts and evidence for rebuttals and support for your subject theory of Evolution/Big Bang. Do you have any at all?? If not, why do you believe it? The argument is not on micro evolution within a kind which can be observed, it's on macro evolution which can not be proven, neither can any evidence or logic be given for it. Oh my Gosh! Nothing isn't anything! "nothing" is not matter, not space, not energy." "nothing" is not a noun, "it's" a pronoun. "It" can not exist neither could "it" have ever in the past or in the future. If "it" did exist, "it" wouldn't be "nothing" but something. "nothing" is the abstract concept of the absence of existence. I'm not arguing about "nothing" any more. It's elementary. Evolution: I asked you not to say something without proof. Give me evidence. I understand what evolution is. The DNA code for one kind of animal is different than that of a different kind of animal. The DNA varies within it's kind, but does not evolve into something else. KIND TO KIND: "Evolution is not a dog turning into a lion overnight." Oh, so instead it happens in millions of years? evidence please? You have none. You only have evidence of adaptations within a specie (micro evolution). But that is not the debate. The debate is your above statement. You believe something you can not prove with science, evidence, or logic. A website that explains the theory is not evidence that it is true. 'You even agreed that evolution exists on a "small scale," I'm assuming you mean microscopic." No, I do not mean microscopic. There is no evidence for that either. I simply mean within a species. Ex. wolf; coyote; dog. Its variation within a species. Not hard science. I said I object to the term, "micro evolution." I only use it because it is what scientists call it. But the moment you believe a dog can ever turn into a lion, you move from science to religion, because you now have no evidence to support what you believe. I don't care if you believe it, but don't call it science. I don't believe the earth is 11,000 years old, I believe it is only almost 6,000 years old. You have failed to prove this not true with facts and evidence. Your faith in the evolution of all organisms, matter, and energy is not based on scientific evidence or facts of any kind. You have simply chosen to believe it. Your faith in this evolution is a religion.