Flying Spaghetti Monster v. Abrahamic God

First of all let me present my arguments and then i will go true yours. When we are talking about difference between God of the bible and f.s.m we must realize some distinct differences: 1) Bible is based on solid historical evidence. Almost no one in modern scholarship denies Jesus existence as real historical person. You can dig up/see the places which are said in the bible. Just consider this: History - John Mcray (Professor of NT archaeology) says: "Archaeology has not produced anything that is unequivocally a contradiction to the Bible," he replied with confidence. "On the contrary, as we"ve seen, there have been many opinions of skeptical scholars that have become codified into "fact" over the years but that archaeology has shown to be wrong." Strobel, Lee (2009-07-27). The Case for Christmas: A Journalist Investigates the Identity of the Child in the Manger (p. 46). Zondervan. Or you can just go to http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org.... Jesus existence Jesus is real historical person who lived 2000 years ago. We have more evidence on him then we need: a) We have 27 biblical sources written by many different authors " Matthew, Mark,Luke (Luke.Acts),John, Paul, Somebody close to Paul (in case of Hebrews),James,Peter,Jude. Thats nine sources on him. b) Then we have Jewish sources on Jesus "Jewish historian Josephus ( 37 to 100 AD) had writen about Jesus in two places. He writes about him in Antiquities 18.3.31 and Antiquities 20.9.1. Yes there are some problems with first one,but i will not get into it. If you want we can talk about that. Second Babylonian Talmud is talking about him. c) We have roman sources like ,,Thallus,Tacitus,Mara Bar-Serapion, and Serapion" (Quote from Cold Case Christianety). But we have no historical evidence supporting f.s.m. We know that it was started by Bobby Henderson in 2005 who wrote it in his open letter to protest against creationists. (source "wiki) And no reason to think its earlier. 2) There are good reasons to believe in resurrection as real event that happened. Gary Habermas developed apologetic method of defending it. It starts by stating facts that are supported by almost every NT scholar/Historian of that time (and remember most of them aren"t believers in Orthodox Christian teachings) " including atheist/Jewish scholars. I will be using variant used in book, Case for resurrection". Which has 4+1 fact. Its important to note that I will use only what atheist scholars will give me. a) First fact " Jesus died by crucifixion. This is agreed almost by 100% of NT scholars. Just look at these quotes: ,,That (Jesus) was crucified is as sure as anything historical can ever be, since both Josephus and Tacitus... agree with the Christian accounts on at least that basic fact." J.D.Crossan (from http://en.wikipedia.org... If you think that J.D.C is a conservative Christian let me remind you that he was founder of Jesus seminar. Which dismissed 80% of Jesus sayings in NT. The reason why they believe it is: 1) We have biblical sources (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John, Pauls letters and pretty much all other) 2)We have non-Christian sources " Josephus, Tacitus, Lucian, Mara Bar-Serapion, Talmud.(From Case for Resurrection) 3) That"s not the best way to invent story. Why to do that if your story will not be respected by Jews or Gentiles. 4)Many other reasons. b) Second fact- Jesus followers believed that he had risen from dead. This fact is supported by: 1st All gospels claim that. 2 Paul claims that 3 Oral tradition (1 Cor 15:3-7) which is dated not more then 5 years after Jesus death. 4 Also early church fathers " Clement, Polycarp " agree. c)Third fact is conversion of Paul. Remember Paul was enemy of Christians and he converted after seeing vision of Jesus. How do we know? 1st Paul writes it in his letters 2 Acts confirms Hes sufferings: 1)Pauls letters 2)Luke 3)Clement of Rome 4)Polycarp We have good evidence for hes conversion and sufferings for Christ. d) Fourth fact is James also converted from unbelief to belief. Conversion: 1st Gospels report Jesus brothers unbelief. 2nd 1 cor 15:3-7 report that Jesus appeared to James. 3rd After James becomes leader of church. Hes death for Christ is reported: 1st by Josephus 2nd Hegesippus 3rd Clement of Alexandria e) Fifth fact is that tomb was empty This is not supported by almost 100% scholars, but around 75%. A lot of arguments can be given here: 1st Recorded in all gospels. Also a lot of reasons that Paul believed. 2nd Woman found the tomb empty. If that is not true then why in planet earth you write that woman found tomb empty. Knowing that they had almost no power to testify at that time. 3rdThe earliest theory about it was that disciples stole the body. Why was that if body was in the tomb. - Matthew 28:13 I believe that the best explanation of this fact is Jesus resurrection. First of all it explains all the facts, second any alternative theory will need to use at least two explanations for this " explaining what disciples/Paul/James saw + empty tomb. But lets see if you can give me a better explanation. What is my argument? 1st I pointed out that bible is a historical source 2nd That its written by eyewitnesses 3rd There is a good reason to believe in resurrection. Your argument We have indisputable video evidence of Him creating our universe. (https://www.youtube.com......) You have to give me evidence this is real video footage of real creation act and not created by people promoting this philosophy. This is Earth's magnetic field (http://www.venganza.org......) First of all this is how it looks: http://en.wikipedia.org... Yes, it looks like spaghetti, but this is just your interpretation. You are searching for things that look like spaghetti and when you find something you use it as proof. This is a cave painting dating back to as fa as 23,000 BCE, 19,000 years before the bible claims that the earth has existed. http://www.venganza.org...... Prove me this is truly real painting, from real cave. This can easily be a fake. Show me some scholar sources on this. Second, this can be a spaceship. Why do you think your interpretation is right. FSM is known as the god of pirates. (http://www.venganza.org......) Again show me some scholarly sources. http://www.scq.ubc.ca... This is you forcing math to work for you the same as Muslims are doing to prove Qur'an. Here is direct evidence of FSM's pirate powers. (https://c1.staticflickr.com......) Again, not much here. You must show that the blief of f.s.m is not created in modern times. This is the Higgs Boson, otherwise known as the god particle (http://www.venganza.org......) If the FSM is not real, then why are the planets shaped like meatballs? (http://th05.deviantart.net......) Again, you"re trying to find something to fit your theory. You have to give something better then forcing something to fit. If FSM is not real, than how can we know his stats? (http://www.mypokecard.com......) You have to prove me that this is not just humans imagining its powers. If you want to use this as proof then be consistent and conclude that you believe that all Pok"mon and Yugioh cards are real because you know their powers. Used sources: Books: "Strobel, Lee (2009-07-27). The Case for Christmas: A Journalist Investigates the Identity of the Child in the Manger (p. 46). Zondervan. "Van Voorst, Robert E. (2000-03-01). Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence (Studying the Historical Jesus. Eerdmans Publishing Co - A. Kindle Edition. "J. Warner Wallace (2013) Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels. Page 43. "Gary R. Habermas;Michael R. Licona. The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Other sources: "http://en.wikipedia.org...;http://carm.org...