Debate topics on this website (debate.org) should be critiqued

My arguments will be very brief because I have hardly any time because some important things came up. I will point out my interpretation of the resolution in the second falls under the rules set out in the first round. I think that debaters on this site are mature enough to provide constructive criticism. I also think that people in general are intelligent enough to tell what criticism is constructive. I will briefly refute my opponent He said there there is a spelling/grammar check. This proves his 7th contention wrong. Also, spelling/grammar are not the only aspects of clarity. This resolution used proper grammar and spelling but was still unclear He says that topics cannot be worded perfectly. This is true, but that doesn't mean wording can't be improved. It is like arguments, there is no perfect argument, but arguments can be improved He says that a topic is one sentence and all ought to be able to write a clear sentence. The topic is a very important sentence, and outside critiques can help. This would prove his 8th point wrong as well because he says it should be open to whomever, and those who could not write a sentence would be included in that. He mentions signaling. If debaters debate against stronger competition, it improves their skills. Therefore, it is a good thing to debate weaker opponents sometimes because it helps those people improve. Education 1. Resolutional analysis has a small educational benefit when compared with the topics discussed. For example, a resolution about the situation in Afghanistan is more educational if the topics and arguments are discussed, rather than the resolution. Critiques allow for the educational benefit of improved resolution, plus the educational benefit from debate of the arguments. 2. Critiques don't necessarily stifle innovation; since the debate topics would not be regulated. Fun 1. If someone's advice would decrease the quality of the resolution, the instigator should know this. 2. See above 3. Obligation would not occur Challenge, winning, recognition See above His case C1) Two conflicting critiques would be evaluated and debated C2) a. This is non-unique to critiques. b. If this were true, than the site should not be taken seriously because the jokers would argue ridiculous positions in good resolutions C3) Tweaks do not have to be taken. A delayed, effective debate is better than a quick, ineffective one C4) Even if critiques are not followed, they give educational benefit. The instigator learns for the future. C5) a.) As my opponent's story shows, this is non-unique b.) Critiques wouldn't change a resolution drastically C6) a.) A degree of ridicule will occur on any site with interaction, non-unique b.) I think that the majority of people are mature enough to not do this C7) My opponent pointed out that there were spelling and grammar checkers C8) Debate should be open to all, even those who cannot write effective topic sentences. He says more on this later, so I will respond when that is posted My Arguments My opponent said in round 2, "I clearly thought the resolution was about different things." This is not his fault. Yet, it proves my point because if clarification had occurred through critiques and my changes in response to those critiques, this never would have occurred. This shows that critiques are good things an would improve the quality of debate, upholding my arguments. My opponent never directly refuted my claims regarding the following: Challenge- I stated that critiques would cause balance in resolutions. He did not show how they would not provide balance Wining- same thing applies to challenges.