The Earth is quasi spherical in shape and not flat.

Not quite so simple I'm afraid. Thanks again for dropping all of my arguments. Let's see, how many were addressed in this round? Oh wait, that would be none. I will address why your butt on my silver platter should not even be mentioned in this debate a little later. As for the weaksauce argument. I was not attacking my opponent. I'm guessing that he looked this argument up. I was suggesting that this is a completely flawed argument, and I couldn't believe anyone would try to make it. This was not in any way an insult to my opponent. If you were offended, I apologize.Time tells what? Oh wait last round, you didn't explain, so I will. Time tells that I will win this argument. My opponent now agrees that time will tell that win because he once again didn't finish the statement. Since my ending to the statement is unchallenged, it stands. Refuting his "arguments" in R4 in the same maner he made them. My refutations correspond with his arguments with the numbers (for clarification purposes): 1) Citing a source and copy pasting something from it FOR YOUR ENTIRE ARGUMENT/POINT IS PLAGAIRISM. Those weren't your arguments. Those were other people saying stuff that you stole from them. I can copy paste stuff from every website in existence, but that doesn't mean I should win a debate. Evidence does not win a debate. Arguments do. Since I am the only one with arguments, this is why I should win. Even if his sources were valid, I owned every one of them which I will show in 4.Here is why if that explanation doesn't suffice. Let's say I read a book. I'm supposed to write a paper on the book. If thought the entire paper I put, "On page #, it says, 'fill in the blank'" or if every sentence I say, "A review on the book says this about it, 'fill in the blank,'" this is plagiarism. It's not my paper. It's a compilation of things other people said. With this explanation, I think it's very obvious to see that every piece of evidence in round 3 was plagiarized.2) There is gravity at the bottom of the universe. My opponent must believe that we all have magical powers to defy this gravity by being on the bottom of the earth.3) What is your point? I'm pretty sure disagreeing with something doesn't make me wrong. My opponent disagrees with me, therefore he is wrong. 4) I have refuted every argument you had. Before I show you, you never said which ones so no one will ever no. I say that I have and will prove it. He has not proven anything in any way. Also, he did admit that I address at least some of his points. He has not defended them meaning he even dropped his own arguments. Here you go: This is how I have refuted every statement he had:ROUND 1Science has proven a flat earth.ROUND 21] Lunar eclipses are not created by the shadow of the earth as seen in my third point. I have evdince and arguments my opponent has not refuted. My opponent dropped this point and had no evidence to support it in the first place. I win this points.2] The illusion of a ship going over a "horizon" is just a trick of the eyes. That ship must be far off. You can't see into eternity, and you're eyes are not valid for evidence. Senses can trick you. See my 4th point. He opponent didn't refute it. I win this point.3] Same point as the previous. Eyes are not to be used as evidence. It isn't evidence at all. Second, eyes are not reliable. I win this dropped point as well.4] I just realized this is the same exact point as the first... I won that one.5] I addressed this with my first point. The sun is like a spotlight. The sun obviously doesn't stay in the same spot or expand over ever place it lights up like a cover. My opponent dropped this point by not attacking my argument. My argument is unchallenged which means I win this point.6] This is adressed directly in my second point. He asked a question and. I answered it. Since he didn't answer it, my answer stands. He dropped this point as well by not defending his own point or attacking mine. I win this as well.7] I adressed this by my point that states that neither the sun nor moon go beneath the earth. They go in eclipses above it. This explains tides easily. My opponent didn't defend his point or prove me wrong. He didn't been bring it up again actually. I win this point.8] We never left space. I clearly said that it was all a hoax. Pictures are created by master designers to keep the lie going. I even had evidence. My opponent had no evidence and didn't refute my point. He didn't defend his either. I win this point. We never went to space.9] Earth is an exception because it has life. Just because other planets are round doesn't mean earth is. Also, we can't be completely sure other planets are round. Again with the eyes. It's not evidence that something appears round. 2D games look kind of 3D. That doesn't mean they go though you're TV in 3D. Trickery. I win this point.ROUND 3I literally went down the list of his arguments like I just did above and tore down all of his arguments against mine. I need not list them all again.Now that I'm done with that, I have attacked every point he had, my opponent has neither defended them by challenging my attacks or attacked my case.5) Good. I have plenty to say still.Conclusion:-My opponent still has not denied believing in ninjas-My opponent did not deny or even address blatantly offending my intelligence by his remarks in R3 which must mean that he meant to directly insult me. Conduct points should go to me by this ALONE. On top of that, he plagiarized all of third round. He even tried to attack me by trying to suggest that I was attacking/insulting him. These are unforgivable sins of every good debater. I apologized for none of his insults while I did. More conduct points should go to me. (See top)-He didn't address any of my arguments in this round. They were all dropped completely in the debate. All of my arguments are unchallenged. I win all of my arguments.-My opponent never answered his own questions while I did. My answered are unchallenged, thus I win all of them.-My opponent basically forfeited R3and R4 because they held no substantial arguments.Please for the love of debate never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever make another topic such as this. What happens is someone who is a great/decent debater, possibly an unknown debater (pun intended), will stumble upon it and completely own it. Thank you very much. I clearly won this debate. Vote con! Thank you in advance all voters.SourcePure, unchallenged, superior, sound, unaddressed, destructive, effective logic.