BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The black community needs to change their current behavior trend

Ok, not sure what you were trying to accomplish with all that fancy defining and stuff, but I will proceed according to my opening statement. I would appreciate it if you would just answer the prompt (it is not that complicated), instead of trying to find faults with it, because you can do that with any prompt you are presented with. Just FYI, use the context of words to find their definitions. In this context, your definition of life makes no sense. Your definition of victim kind of makes sense, but here is mine: A person who believes that others are at fault for their current state of being. Now, back to the debate. After attempting to decipher your premise, I got this: "The constant denial of their right and their way of behaving creates these back-lashes that can be seen in today's world. There is a pressure in all of them that makes them explode at every negative act of aggression (or perceived aggression) addressed towards them. In short, having a minority mind-set will prevent them from being assimilated into the mainstream." Ok, so it looks like you are saying that their current behavior is justified by acts of 'denial' and 'acts of aggression.' Let us look into this a little further. What you are saying is that violence justifies violence. Use some basic reasoning....Does this really make sense to you? I don't think so. Now, I will agree that in some extreme cases, violence can be used as a last resort. But in the case of Ferguson and most recently Baltimore, violence began even before the facts came out [2]. If you really want to dive down into the case of the Ferguson shooting, and the George Zimmerman case, then be my guest. But, as the juries ruled, both officer Wilson and Mr. Zimmerman were rightfully proven innocent. And yet, much of the African American community seems to disregard one of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty [3]. Instead, the rioters (most of whom were not even from the town, see source 2) decided immediately that the killer of the black man was to blame before any evidence even came out. So in conclusion, the 'acts of aggression you seem to imply were really the just treatment of a violent attack on police officers. If you have any other situations, please bring them up. Addressing your second point, as to denial, have you heard about recent college admission policies? As of now, 76% of Americans oppose race-conscious college admissions, which factor skin color into whether you get into college or not. This is a travesty. Making distinctions based on race is also know as RACISM. So I don't know what 'denial' you are speaking of, but this sure sounds likes quite some denial of non-minority students who work their tails off to get to college. So, my question to you, is: Do you agree with the current actions of society that claim to benefit the black community? [1] http://www.gallup.com... [2] http://www.nationalreview.com... [3[ https://www.law.cornell.edu... [4] http://news.yahoo.com...
The black community needs to change their current behavior trend

I will gladly accept this challenge. life: the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death. victim: a person harmed, injured, or killed as a result of a crime, accident, or other event or action. "The black community is harming themselves by viewing themselves as victims in almost every aspect of life. " If the pro's statement can be reinterpreted based on the definitions of life and victim then it will indicate that the black community is injured/harmed/killed by their views (the event) of organic matter. Maybe a rephrase is necessary? My argument based on title : The black community's behavioral trend has been instigated before the slave trades, back in the days when their tribes will participate in this "unorthodox" events (as it may appear to the white colored individual). It is what characterized them and made them as the behavioral body (if you were to call it that) that they are now. The constant denial of their right and their way of behaving creates these back-lashes that can be seen in today's world. There is a pressure in all of them that makes them explode at every negative act of aggression (or perceived aggression) addressed towards them. In short, having a minority mind-set will prevent them from being assimilated into the mainstream.
Smash Bros new characters

Bonkers would quickly become a favorite. Know what would be genius and large companyish? Plush. Make stuffed toys of Smash Bros stuff. Bonkers can be made cute and charming. And little kids + smashing + toon toughie = little boy favorite. Bonkers SMAAAAASH! And still, i believe bonkers could best kyubi given players of the same skill level. Rebuttal: Dedede is nothing like bonkers. We also have 2 links. We also have aura sphere from lucario and samus's chargable blaster. Two hammer dudes is not an issue. And neither of them are needed, we are suggestign an addition. Conclusion: Bonkers is simply better.
Smash Bros new characters

Alright. Let's see what Perussi thinks of Kyubi in Smash Bros.Me: "Side B; Flame Charge: Kyubi ingulfs himself in fire, and dashes forward. It travels pretty far, and hits enemies multiple times until it ends. It has pretty good knockback, and deals a maximum of 16%. It can be used for horizontal recovery, but if used in mid-air, it can't be used again until Kyubi touches the ground, or gets hit."Perussi: "Might be a little uncontrollable."It's sort of like Charizard's Flare Blitz, though closer to the Dragon Rush alternate Side B.Me: "Up B; Flame Warp: Kyubi disappears, then reappears a short distance away. It goes a bit farther than Shiek's up B. Flames appear before and after the warp, dealing 3% to opponents that touch them, and small knockback."Perussi: "Ninja???"Guess I should be more clear. In Yo-kai Watch, Yo-kai can teleport with a puff of purplish smoke. Kyubi's Flame Warp is actually based on this ability. Kyubi is not Naruto.Me: "Down B; Stun Pulse: Kyubi snaps his fingers, stunning nearby foes. The higher the enemy's damage, the longer they're stunned, up to a maximum of 3 seconds, not counting mashing the controller to break free. If used less than 30 seconds after the previous Stun Pulse, the stun time decreases, to a minumum of 0.25 seconds. Using the move makes Kyubi vulernable for half a second, however, making the move quite punishable. The move also does 2% damage."Perussi: "Just too weak."Conceded. The stun time should be a max of 6 seconds instead. Should be enough time to at least land a Smash Attack. When mashing at maximum potential, it would only stun for 3 seconds at max. At 100%, the opponent would be high enough for the maximum stun time.Also, the Down B comes from, believe it or not, the anime. Kyubi has mind manipulation abilities, mainly used to make people forget things.Perussi: "I actually don't have really anything against your character except mine is stronger and can match Kyubi's speed. And Bonker's moves are more practical."Kyubi would indeed make a good character for Smash Bros. Bonkers however... isn't King Dedede the hammer wielder already? We don't really need Bonkers in Smash Bros, now that I think about it.But I think we can all agree that Kyubi's the better candidate for Smash Bros. It would get more fans of the Yo-kai Watch franchise, and support the release of Yo-kai Watch 3 in North America. Kirby's already popular as he's going to get, and adding Bonkers would just be a waste of a slot. Vote for the fox!
Smash Bros new characters

*note - 80 or 75 percent? that wasn't set in stone, the cerainty of the KONeutral B; Flame Shot: Kyubi launches a ball of flame forward. It travels decently fast, and deals 6%.KSide B; Flame Charge: Kyubi ingulfs himself in fire, and dashes forward. It travels pretty far, and hits enemies multiple times until it ends. It has pretty good knockback, and deals a maximum of 16%. It can be used for horizontal recovery, but if used in mid-air, it can't be used again until Kyubi touches the ground, or gets hit.Might be a little uncontrollable.Up B; Flame Warp: Kyubi disappears, then reappears a short distance away. It goes a bit farther than Shiek's up B. Flames appear before and after the warp, dealing 3% to opponents that touch them, and small knockback.Ninja???Down B; Stun Pulse: Kyubi snaps his fingers, stunning nearby foes. The higher the enemy's damage, the longer they're stunned, up to a maximum of 3 seconds, not counting mashing the controller to break free. If used less than 30 seconds after the previous Stun Pulse, the stun time decreases, to a minumum of 0.25 seconds. Using the move makes Kyubi vulernable for half a second, however, making the move quite punishable. The move also does 2% damage.Just too weak.Final Smash; Inferno Eruption: Kyubi unleashes a storm of fireballs to rain down on the stage. The move is similar to Ness and Lucas's PK Starstorm in Brawl. Each fireball does 20%, and has incredible launching power.I actually don't have really anything against your character except mine is stronger and can match Kyubi's speed. And Bonker's moves are more practical.
Smash Bros new characters

I'm looking forward to this debate. With that, here's what Kyubi's move set might be.Neutral B; Flame Shot: Kyubi launches a ball of flame forward. It travels decently fast, and deals 6%.Side B; Flame Charge: Kyubi ingulfs himself in fire, and dashes forward. It travels pretty far, and hits enemies multiple times until it ends. It has pretty good knockback, and deals a maximum of 16%. It can be used for horizontal recovery, but if used in mid-air, it can't be used again until Kyubi touches the ground, or gets hit.Up B; Flame Warp: Kyubi disappears, then reappears a short distance away. It goes a bit farther than Shiek's up B. Flames appear before and after the warp, dealing 3% to opponents that touch them, and small knockback.Down B; Stun Pulse: Kyubi snaps his fingers, stunning nearby foes. The higher the enemy's damage, the longer they're stunned, up to a maximum of 3 seconds, not counting mashing the controller to break free. If used less than 30 seconds after the previous Stun Pulse, the stun time decreases, to a minumum of 0.25 seconds. Using the move makes Kyubi vulernable for half a second, however, making the move quite punishable. The move also does 2% damage.Final Smash; Inferno Eruption: Kyubi unleashes a storm of fireballs to rain down on the stage. The move is similar to Ness and Lucas's PK Starstorm in Brawl. Each fireball does 20%, and has incredible launching power.Why Kyubi of all characters?Yo-kai Watch is pretty popular in Japan, getting 3 games in the series, an app, and a cartoon. But on the internet, most people either have no idea what it is, or hate on it, calling me a "weeb". Having a character from Yo-kai Watch come to the Smash roster is a great way to advertise this series, possibly allowing Level-5 to have more support for their games.If a Yo-kai ever got into the Smash roster, it would either be Kyubi or Venoct. But Kyubi has a bit more to work with, since he mainly uses fire attacks, and Venoct's only got his dragonsnake scarf. Plus, Kyubi's my favorite character in the cartoon, so that adds to the reason I want him.[I can see my opponent is a fan of the Kirby series, and Bonkers could very well be in Smash 5. I wish him luck showing that a hammer wielding gorilla is a better candidate than a 3rd party nine tailed fox]In case you have no idea what I'm talking about, here's Kyubi's wiki page: http://yokaiwatch.wikia.com...;
Smash Bros new characters

I've came up with a down special for once!*Ahem* Sorry about all of my forfeits. It's just that I run away when I'm afraid I'll lose. This is a debate for any good new Smash Bros fighters for Smash 5, which will probably be released somewhere in 2018. Anyways, here are the rules:1) The character cannot be from the internet, real life, or from your own creation.2) Your must make a move set of, at minumum, 4 Special moves (Up B, Neutral B, Side B, Down B), and a Final Smash. I'd prefer the move set to be canon to the character's original game or show.3) You must give a good reason for your chosen character. Saying that it's cool, cute, "the best", etc. is a horrible reason, and will be ignored.4) Your character can not have been in any previous Smash Bros game, so you can't choose Pichu from Melee, Solid Snake from Brawl, or any DLC characters from Smash 4. (Well, if the character only ever appeared as an Assist Trophy, you can choose them)5) If you can't think of an argument, type in "Pass" or something along those lines before the 72 hours time limit runs out, so the debate can at least not freeze.I think that's everything. My character is Kyubi from Yo-kai Watch, a video game series.
Homemade cookies are better then store-bought

I saw in the comments that my opponent thought I was going to forfeit. No, I don't think so! "My opponent states that with homemade cookies you know what you are putting in them, however, according to a survey conducted by foodnetwork.com, approximately 19% of home chefs make cookies from scratch. Therefore, the other 81% uses the premade brand." This is very incorrect! If 19% of them make cookies from scratch, The other people USE A RECIPE! Just because 19% make them from scratch, it doesn't automatically mean all the others use the pre-made stuff! If I could actually see the exact web page where it says that 81% of home chefs use the pre-made brand, then I would actually believe you. "Homemade cookies have preservatives 81% of the time, at least with store-bought cookies you know whats in them as well, its called the ingredient label." Well, you're already wrong with the number of home chefs who use pre-made stuff, so this statement is incorrect. Let me show you some examples. The ingredient label of Chips Ahoy cookies, a pack of 4 cookies: 1.4 oz, 4 cookie pack. Ingredients: enriched flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamin mononitrate [vitamin B1], riboflavin [vitamin B2], folic acid), semisweet chocolate chips (sugar, chocolate, cocoa butter, dextrose, soy lecithin - an emulsifier), sugar, partially hydrogenated soybean oil, high fructose corn syrup, leavening (baking soda, ammonium phosphate), salt whey (from milk), natural and artificial flavor, caramel color. If you were to make the cookies from a recipe you would maybe have: an egg, flour, sugar, baking soda, chocolate chips, vegetable oil, and maybe some salt. So, look at all the preservatives that were added in Chips Ahoy. For example, partially hydrogenated soybean oil. That is actually a trans fat. It is slowly killing people, it's like cigarettes in that way. In the mean time, partially hydrogenated oils make you fat. Partially hydrogenated oils are commonly found in processed foods like commercial baked products such as cookies, cakes and crackers, and even in bread. They are also used as cooking oils (called "liquid shortening") for frying in restaurants. Here is exactly what it does: Trans fats cause significant and serious lowering of HDL (good) cholesterol and a significant and serious increase in LDL (bad) cholesterol; make the arteries more rigid; cause major clogging of arteries; cause insulin resistance; cause or contribute to type 2 diabetes; and cause or contribute to other serious health problems. Obviously, store bought cookies are much unhealthier then homemade cookies because of all the preservatives in them. You DON'T really know what's in them! For example, ammonium phosphate! No one really knows what they are eating there!
Homemade cookies are better then store-bought

My opponent states that with homemade cookies you know what you are putting in them, however, according to a survey conducted by foodnetwork.com, approximately 19% of home chefs make cookies from scratch. Therefore, the other 81% uses the premade brand. So, incorrect. Homemade cookies have preservatives 81% of the time, at least with store-bought cookies you know whats in them as well, its called the ingredient label.
Homemade cookies are better then store-bought

"CONTENTION NUMBER 1: STORE BOUGHT COOKIES ARE MADE BY PROFESSIONALS AND NOT BY UNEXPER- IENCED ADULTS ======================================================================= Well, as my contention states, when a store bought cookie is made, it must go through a process in which basic- ally would make every cookie the same (hence, cookie cutters). With home made, you get mixed results." Incorrect! They have machines that do everything, not professionals. Some very few cookies are made by professionals. We am not talking about a bakery, where professionals may make cookies, but a store, a grocery store! It's true that every cookie would be the same, but if you have every looked at the back of one of the cookie boxes, they have so many preservatives in them! When you make them homemade, at least you know what you are putting in them!
Homemade cookies are better then store-bought

1) I do have to thank you for not making this such a serious topic. 2) I MUST DISAGREE!!! ======================================================================= CONTENTION NUMBER 1: STORE BOUGHT COOKIES ARE MADE BY PROFESSIONALS AND NOT BY UNEXPER- IENCED ADULTS ======================================================================= Well, as my contention states, when a store bought cookie is made, it must go through a process in which basic- ally would make every cookie the same (hence, cookie cutters). With home made, you get mixed results. Therefore, I urge a negative ballot on this topic. Thank you.
Hillary Would be the Worst President Ever

How about ISIS, huh? All politicians say that they'll do something to fight, but that's because they want to get into presidency. And, if unleashed, ISIS or another terrorist group could decimate 10% of our population if they wanted to, and they do. Have you ever heard of the role HC (Hillary Clinton) played in Bengahzi? If that's not horrendous, then horrendous has no existence. And then, AND THEN, lying to the world be saying it was a stupid video that viciously killed three American citizens!
Hillary Would be the Worst President Ever

James Buchanan lead us into the civil war. Andrew Johnson (only president due to Lincoln's assassination) crimes such as mishandling military secrets got him impeached by congress. Herbert Hoover lead us into the great depression [1]. Civil War killed two-percent of the US population, today that would be six-million lives [2]. [1] http://www.rantpolitical.com... [2] http://blogs.ancestry.com...
Hillary Would be the Worst President Ever

Ok, there's a problem with that. My iPad, which I use for DDO, can't do bold or italics on the keyboard. Bold for me = " ". Italic = () So, if you don't think that Hillary is an atrocious president, check this website out: http://www.breitbart.com... How could you call that good? Look at one, three, 24, and 27. Yep. That's BAD. The majority (and that's how people vote: majority!) are horrendous.
Hillary Would be the Worst President Ever

Thank you for debating. Here's the way the debate will go: 1st Round = Acceptance 2nd Round = Arguments Pro/Con, NO rebuttals 3rd Round = Rebuttals 4th Round = Rebuttals to Rebuttals, Final Remarks Good luck! Feel free to say anything you want about the topic! I'm pro, which means I think Hillary would be the worst prez ever.
Hillary Would be the Worst President Ever

Rebuttal:The positive case against her is meritless word association. It implies some people don't like her, not anything about how bad she'd be as president. Defense:8 years as First Lady, 4 more as Secretary of State. This means 12 years in the White House, and she's only managed to kill 3 Americans. If she did a Benghazi every day for 8 years as president (assuming reelection for more time to mess things up), she'd have only killed 2190 Americans. Further Clinton is not a member of ISIS.
Resolved: Homosexuality is immoral.

I would like to mention that my opponent has completely dropped my 3rd contention. Because I have proven through my Dr. FullofShit evidence that monkey's have equal mental capacity to humans, and a higher threshold for tool-usage and short-term adaptation, we can assume that if they were to form a resistance group that it would be highly likely that they could steal some nuclear weapons and cause world-wide havoc in a massive terrorist attack, and now this run-on sentence is coming to an end as soon as I stop typing it, but first I must urge you to vote for me, because, ya know, my opponent never presented an argument, oh, and you shouldn't deduct spelling and grammar for this round because my opponent's lack of argumentation deprives you of the ability to compare my spelling and grammar to his, thus you cannot declarative say his was better, thank you and have a nice day.
Economic Governmental Intervention

America was founded upon the economic beliefs of Adam Smith as published in his seminal book The Wealth of Nations in 1776. Smith proposed that a free market economy in which governmental intervention is minimum yields the most economic prosperity. Smith argued, and history has proven, that a market economy in which individuals with specialized skills pursue their own interests makes for the most economic success. An environment that promotes economic freedom is imperative to economic growth. Economic freedom consists of: stable currency, private property protection, low taxes, low tariffs, and minimal governmental intervention. Economies that possess these characteristics are the most conductive to growth. History has overwhelmingly shown that capitalism has prevailed over socialism, and thus governmental non-intervention and the market economy have prevailed over governmental intervention and the centrally-planned economy. After World War II, North Korea adopted a socialistic economic system while South Korea adopted the market economy. Today, North Korea is one of the poorest and most oppressive nations on the planet while South Korea has one of the fastest-growing economies on the planet. Similarly, After WWII, Germany divided, and East Germany utilized a centrally-planned economy while West Germany utilized a market economy. East Germany eventually surrendered to West Germany because of the severe poverty it encountered. The results of the Cold War also support the supremacy of the market economy; during the mid-twentieth century, the world"s leading scholars and economists were divided between those who advocated for socialism and those who advocated for capitalism. The Soviet Union"s governmental intervention was an utter failure, and the nation collapsed in 1991; America, of course, has not and will not collapse because of the ideals it was founded upon, one of these being the concept of Smithian economics. The competitive market economy has proven superior to the centrally-planned economy, but governmental intervention is arguably necessary in many cases (and governmental intervention is not necessarily synonymous with socialism). Sources: B. Taylor. "Socialism vs. Capitalism." 2006. 7 October 2013. Web. . Holcombe, Randall G. Economic Freedom and Economic Growth. The Independent Institute. 1 February 1998. Web. 28 September 2013.
Nazis were bad people. Hitler was a bad man

You're not understanding. You haven't rebutted anything. I explained how some jews were evil. You haven't rebutted. Not all jews went to concentration camps. Even then they weren't bad. Only the eliteist jews were harmed. Not the typical Jew on the street. I'm not saying some black people need to be killed solely because of their race, but because of their genetic predisposition to crime. 6 million weren't killed. Its impossible that many were killed. Your sources come from biased sources who didn't use any math. There trying to put blame on socialism because they know it works. Did you know the London bombing wasn't done by Hitler. Nor commanded by him. It was a false flag attack to put blame on Hitler.