It is unreasonable for a completely benevolent god to sentence all non-believers to damnation

Ok so basically you're argument for why it is unreasonable for a completely benevolent god to sentence all non-believers to damnation is that, for some people, there are just not enough evidence to confirm that god exists. Well guess what? I agree with you if that assertion is indeed true. Of course I don't agree with that assertion though. But that is not the debate here, if that's your argument then we should be debating about if God gave us enough evidence to believe he even exists. Like I said, Ill be defending the Christian God of the Bible. And this debate calls for both of us to assume that the God of the Bible exists, at least for argument sake. This also means that we have to assume, for argument sake, that the Bible is the word of God. If you can't do that then we really have no debate here, and we should start a new debate and argue if God really does exist and if He gave us enough evidence. Since I will be defending the Christian God of the Bible, as you so graciously allowed me to do so, I will base my arguments on what the Bible (the word of God) teaches and what Christians believe are true: 1. Only those who put their faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior will be saved from eternal damnation. Simply believing that God exists does not help you one bit. Like I mentioned in Round 1, we are damned because of sin, not because they didn't believe in God. Remember that Satan himself and his demons all KNOW God exists. James 2:19 "You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that--and shudder." This narrows down even further who will be spared from eternal damnation. But the point is that SIN is why we deserve eternal damnation, and God, the ultimate judge, is justified in sentencing the guilty. 2. God DID make himself known to us. Romans 1:18-25 "The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen." The Bible teaches that we are without excuse. In our heart of hearts we know that the true God exists and we suppress this truth because of our wickedness. Your argument is a very good example of this. You're saying that we are justified and do not deserve punishment because God did not make it clear enough. It isn't our fault, it's God's fault!" But if the God of the Bible is in fact real, and the Bible is in fact his infallible word, then you really have no argument on why God is vindicated when he condemns SINNERS to hell. To summarize my points, we are not sentenced to eternal damnation because of unbelief. We are sentenced to eternal damnation because of sin which INCLUDES unbelief. Unbelief is not the result of lack of confirmation from God, but is the result of us suppressing the truth that God made plain to us. We are all wicked and are all deserving of punishment, but God showed mercy by giving us His son to pay the penalty for our transgressions. Romans 3:23-26 "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement,through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished—he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus." How then does this negate or contradict the omni-benevolent nature of God? The purpose of the judge analogy was to show that the omni-benevolent God acting as a righteous judge by punishing the guilty, is not unreasonable, which is exactly what we are debating about.