Babies are atheist

Apologies for the forfeit in the previous round, DDO had shut down the site for maintenance when I tried to post. Why Babies are not Atheists Firstly and perhaps most importantly, a baby is not aware of the concept of a god or gods--therefore it logically implausible for it to be an atheist. Even if we're to base it on Pros definitions that atheist simply means 'lack of belief', it is still not possible. Lack of belief would require that the individual has prior knowledge of what they're *not* believing in, while babies simply do not have that. Technically, a baby neither believes or disbelieves on God[s] because once again: it does not know who or exactly what a God[s] is and has yet to reach the mental capacity to become aware or find out. Another factor is that the word 'atheist' is a self-described term, one can actually only properly determine if a person is an atheist if that person states it or at least gives clear indication of possessing atheist views; such as advocating for the non-existence or God or attempting to disprove the potential existence of God. A baby is naturally incapable of both things. Generally, a baby can in fact only start saying formed words at around nine months--which is three months from them being a year old and not that far from them actually being considered a 'toddler' and not a 'baby'. The words that usually come from its mouth are things like 'mama' or 'papa', or in my case my pets name at the time, it's certainly not things like 'I am an atheist' or 'there is no God', or even 'I have a lack of belief in God'. As stated, these would be the only terms in which we could determine that the baby was indeed an atheist. Alluding again to my first contention, a baby is born into this world with a completely fresh mind--upon being born it knows nothing of religion, God, or lack of God. These concepts can only be learned when its mind begins to form and when it has the mental capacity to become more aware of its surroundings, and the fact is that this occurs after it is no longer a baby. I'd point out to Pro that a baby becomes a toddler between 12-18 months [it depends on when they learn to walk] which overall is a considerably short period of time. Once more, a human life under 18 months cannot not be an atheist, largely due it not *knowing* about God's [potential] existence or [potential] non-existence. It cannot believe or not believe, or have lack of belief in God for this very reason. Pro outlines in round one that 'the question at hand is, what does it mean to be an atheist', simply put it means: -You're aware of the concept of God. -You're aware of teachings relating to God. -You have made the conscious choice to either not believe there is a God, or have 'lack of belief' in God. Pro has evidently failed to recognize that the 'lack of belief' definitions he's based his position on *still* suit my case, because that 'lack of belief' would require some awareness and knowledge of the subject matter. A baby cannot mentally *think* that it has a 'lack of belief' in God and is therefore an atheist, and as I've highlighted, it cannot verbally *say* that it has a 'lack of belief in God and is therefore an atheist. I also pointed out in round one that for Pro to *prove* his argument and affirm his resolution, he would have to show that all babies in the world are atheists as he is implying 'babies' on a general basis--that is part of his BoP.