Evolution is real

-The title of the debate is evolution is real not is evolution a fact.I have to prof that evolution is a real phenomenon happening now.If it is real then it is a fact. Are you saying that something can be real, and yet not an absolute truth? I was talking about scientific real. Claiming that it is real-real is just digging a bigger hole for yourself. The problem is, we can't prove that anything is real. You could be a brain in vat, having a long dream, be in a virtual world, etc... Granted, there is no reason to assume that any of these is the case, but we can't deny their possibility either. (1)Definition of FACT (2) 1 : a thing done: as a obsolete : feat b : crime <accessory after the fact> c archaic : action 2 archaic : performance, doing 3 : the quality of being actual : actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence> 4 a : something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact> b : an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage> 5 : a piece of information presented as having objective reality — in fact : in truthDefinition of REAL(3) 1 : of or relating to fixed, permanent, or immovable things (as lands or tenements) 2 a : not artificial, fraudulent, or illusory : genuine <real gold>; also : being precisely what the name implies <a real professional>b (1) : occurring or existing in actuality <saw a real live celebrity> <a story of real life> (2) : of or relating to practical or everyday concerns or activities <left school to live in the real world> (3) : existing as a physical entity and having properties that deviate from an ideal, law, or standard <a real gas> — compare ideal 3bc : having objective independent existence <unable to believe that what he saw was real>d : fundamental, essential e (1) : belonging to or having elements or components that belong to the set of real numbers <the real roots of an equation> <a real matrix> (2) : concerned with or containing real numbers <real analysis> (3) : real-valued <real variable>f : measured by purchasing power <real income> <real dollars> g : complete, utter <a real fiasco> 3 of a particle : capable of being detected — compare virtual 3 — re·al·ness noun — for real 1 : in earnest : seriously <fighting for real> 2 : genuine <couldn't believe the threats were for real> 3 : genuinely good or capable of success (as in competition) <not yet sure if this team is for real> So as I said, it is impossible to prove something from an empirical data exists in reality. Science have the capability of ever changing, we can't call anything absolutely true in science.However, for good sports I will interrupt the resolution as "The evidence for evolution is real". By real, I mean I mean a scientific fact; "Was observed".It [The scientific method] is based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning, the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses. -Science Daily(4)Do we really have to wait millions of years to do science? I will ignore the fallacies for a moment, but I am going to ask a question. Does the assumption of evolution have any logical alternatives? Are there any actual empirical evidence that complex organs like hearts and brains are caused by evolution? Is there any evidence that there is a mechanism that allows single-celled creatures to become multi-celled? How did biological systems form?Of course, the burden of proof is ignored because we apparently have to wait for thousands of years. Think about it. If changes stack up after thousands if not millions of years, then a few tissues will randomly form for no benefit over generations until they gather together forming an organ, the same process repeats until a system is formed. There is no basis to that claim except imagination and wishful thinking.There is the fallacy of affirming the consequent.1- If evolution is true, then we should see similarities.2- We see similarities.3- Therefore, evolution is true.The same as this:1- If the moon is made of Swiss cheese, we should see craters.2- We see craters.3- Therefore, the moon is made from Swiss cheese. Things on evolution: -Natural selection is a phenomen proved in the natural selection of the white moths in London,seingn in natur or even artificial selection. (Arteficial selection:selection that does not happens naturally by natural selection and sexual selection.arteficial selection is guided by smart beigns by they own criteria) Natural selection has been proven in the video I will up-load on natural selection. Artificial selction has been done by humans to farm animals that have been arteficialy selected to be of more us to the animal product industries cows have beenselected to produce more milk andchicken to produce more eggs. Plants have been artificially inseminated to create new sorts of flours in Holland. Sexual selection:has been proven in my first argument and you didn"t refused so I assume Dragonfang doesn"t oppose to Natural selection and Sexual selection.True, you have to demonstrate that natural selection causes evolution in order to use it as an argument. It is just like shooting black rabbits on snow, the rabbits are the same, but the number of black rabbits is different.Sadly, I don't accept videos as arguments as I agreed to debate you, you can use them as sources though. Even if I did, the videos are informative on the hypotheses and all, but I see no argument showing evolution was observed. You are welcome to use any argument you find on a video. But when do different varieties of a specis like dogs that have very big differences of dogs like pitbulls and rotweilers. Evolution has been observed the creation of a new specis:http://evolution.berkeley.edu......There are tall and short people. Are you saying that the next generations will continue to grow taller or shorter until a new specie is created? These are traits that can go back and forth. You need to show that we went from one-celled creatures to fish to mammals to monkeies (Chimps, apes, whatever) to us. Show for example that dolphins evolved from mammals who took a swim and never came back (I guess the sharks weren't bad after all). We are all related:Humans have 50% of the same genetical material as a fruit fly and 98% in common with chips.we all have almost the same genetical material.So what? Does this prove evolution happened? Again, the only way you can use this as a proof is if you ignore any other alternative explanation. That is only an observation, not an evidence.Also, what are these suppose to mean? What is the percentage of differences needed to falsify evolution? The results are not conclusive. (5) Furthermore, it did not compare the whole genome.More than 30% of the chimp Y chromosome lacks an alignable counterpart on the human Y chromosome, and vice versa, whereas this is true for less than 2% of the remainder of the genome. (6) Conclusion:evolution is proven it"s a real thing here on Earth if it is true on other planets but we don"t if alien life exist. Mutacion are real proven by science over and over tryng to debate against that is follishness. Mutacions add genetical material to be sorted out by natural or artificial selection.However, you needed to prove it according to reality which is impossible. I only need you to prove it as observed by science.Mutation is real. However, it does not account to evolution. The types of mutations are: Translocation: The joining of a fragmented chromosome to a non-homologous chromosome is a translocation. The piece of chromosome detaches from one chromosome and moves to a new position on another chromosome. Deletion: This mutation results from the breakage of a chromosome in which the genetic material becomes lost during cell division. The genetic material can break off from anywhere on the chromosome. Duplication: Duplications are produced when extra copies of genes are generated on a chromosome. Inversion: In an inversion, the broken chromosome segment is reversed and inserted back into the chromosome. If the inversion encompasses the centromere of the chromosome, it is called a pericentric inversion. If it involves the long or short arm of the chromosome and does not include the centromere, it is called a paracentric inversion. Isochromosome: This type of chromosome is produced by the improper division of the centromere. Isochromosomes contain either two short arms or two long arms. A typical chromosome contains one short arm and one long arm. (7)Where is the added genetic material?(1) http://www.iep.utm.edu...(2) http://www.merriam-webster.com...(3) http://www.merriam-webster.com...(4) http://www.sciencedaily.com...(5) http://sites.bio.indiana.edu...(6) http://www.nature.com...(7) http://biology.about.com...