Germ theory is a fraud

I know I said 48 hours, but I hit my limit for my ability to process new information earlier than expected. Got only eight minutes into the video. Instead I will only debate what you posted as opposed to the links. "Germ theory is essentially an illogical assumption. The assumption that germs can or would kill their host is illogical. If this had been occurring throughout mankind's evolution, then, the germs would have become extinct a long time ago." Pro Germs are scavengers like vultures. Vultures don't normally kill healthy prey. Germs like vultures appear when an animal is in a weakened state. Often finishing off the victim like many scavengers in nature do. Think of wolves, hunting the weakest deer ensuring survival of the fittest. Germs ensure survival of the fittest by killing the young, weak, old, and sick. In rare instances groups of scavengers will kill healthy animals. Germs kill plants, also known as blight. Pro "The grain crops that they plant are unnatural to the human digestive system and cause all sorts of problems for humans. These problems may include, blurred or poor vision due to high blood sugar levels, diabetes, stroke, heart attack, cancer, arthritis, dementia, colds and flu." No proof, the disease could have just as easily been caused by the consumption of cooked meat and dairy products. Pro "3. Nature doesn't have any diseases. Disease is restricted only to humans. Animals in natural surroundings never get sick. That's a little hard to prove since humans occupy most of the earth. How would a human know this without getting close to such an animal? Pro "The only instances of animals getting sick is when those animals eat or are infected with human made chemicals which cause the disease or problem. Some examples would be - Tasmanian Devil - Cancer caused by herbicides, insecticides, fire retardants, plastics, rubbish tips and poison baits. Bees - Colony Collapse Disorder, Varroa and Acarapis Mites - These are just the result of insecticide spraying which causes these problems." Yes, we all know that toxins like cigarette smoke can cause disease. Pro "Note - The authorities try very hard to ignore the causes of disease so that they can't be blamed as being part of the cause. Thus, the pharmaceutical industry and government bodies are protected against litigation and prosecution. You will never hear a media report on a disease which highlights the true cause. The media will never say, for example - "that the Tasmanian Devils are being poisoned by toxic chemicals in the environment". In order to find the true cause you have to seek out secretly produced research documents which never reach the public's notice. " I hear of pet's on the news being poisoned all the time. Mostly antifreeze. "4. The main cause of human diseases are improper diets, lack of sanitation, eating stale food, faecal infection of water supply, chemical poisoning and over processing of food. Humans have adopted an unnatural diet which nature never intended. The human body can't handle or deal with the foods that humans eat, thus, they get sick and blame it on germs as being the culprits. Universities support germ theory because because they get funding from the pharmaceutical industry and germ theory generates a lot of profit for the health industry in general. " You act as if nature is an intelligent being. This is no longer a scientific argument but instead a religious argument. "5. The medical authorities keep changing the names of diseases to suit themselves. This is because they really don't know one disease from another disease. They generally only identify diseases by symptoms. After all, all viruses look pretty much alike. Lol " I don't have enough time to refute everyone of your many claims. Pro "1. All I need to prove is that germ theory is a fraud. The key word being fraud. Thus, if any part of the theory is fraudulent, then, the entire theory should be considered as a general fraud. One cannot commit a partial fraud. Thus, in order to win my case; all I have to prove is one case of where it was claimed that a germ caused a disease and it was later found that it wasn't a germ that caused it. " For the germ theory to be fraud it most be false. If one is telling the truth one cannot be a fraud. If a theory is correct, it cannot be a fraud. "Pathology. the theory that infectious diseases are due to the agency of germs or microorganisms." dictionary.refrence.com http://dictionary.reference.com... "Why can a hypothesis never be "proven" to be true? a. One can never collect enough data to be 100% sure." funnelbrain.com http://www.funnelbrain.com... By definition the germ theory must be falsifiable in order for it to be scientific. Thus, the germ theory's hypothesis could be proven false, thus falsifying the theory. In contrast scientific studies could support the hypothesis. All I see is an expression of doubts about the germ theory. No scientific evidence that falsifies the hypothesis thus proving the germ theory is false. If the germ theory is proven false the claim could then be made that the germ theory is a fraud. As long as the hypothesis hasn't been proven false there is no way you can prove that the germ theory is a fraud. At the same time you appear to use religion to disprove a scientific theory "Humans have adopted an unnatural diet which nature never intended." Pro I see no way that you can disprove a scientific theory on religious grounds. "On the contrary, I don't get any diseases, viruses or suffer from neurological disorders. This is because I understand that diet is the cause of most disease. I also understand that dangerous chemicals can cause disease. Thus, I avoid preservatives and processed foods which may contain dangerous chemicals." Pro There is an alternate explanation. Your body immune system is strengthen by your healthy lifestyle. Therefore you immune system is able to quickly and efficiently ward off pathogens.