Church's chicken is superior to KFC's chicken

1.A My opponent cites 9 sides to my 8 sides. That is great and all, but the number of sides does not matter. My claim that Church's chicken is "cooked to perfection" and "melt in your mouth delicious" goes unrefuted, so extend that. Also, make a note that he left it alone, so don't let him bring it up in the next round. That would be abusive to the Pro. He also states his own claim that " KFC's sides are much higher in quality, taste, and health.". This would be false since neither of us have given health statistics, he has no way to back that claim. Seeing as I go into more detail why mine is great in taste, (by saying that it is cooked to perfection and melt in your mouth delicious), and he gives no detail, we have to go with Church's chicken being better quality and more tasteful than KFC's chicken. For a side note, I call Jalapeï¿½o Peppers more than a side, I call them heaven in the form of a vegetable. 1.B I was wrong in the assumption that KFC had no sauces, but it still stands that Church's sauces are better. He states "ranch, BBQ, Honey Mustard, etc…", but we have to assume that's all they have (besides the colonel sauce) because he doesn't provide us the etc. Keep in my voters that he hasn't provided it now, so it would be abusive to the Pro for him to state them later in the debate. Church's sauces are better not because they have more, but because they have all of KFC's and more. (Except the colonel sauce). With more variety comes more taste. Now on the this colonel sauce my opponent speaks of.....my opponent even note's " It is a secret sauce that absolutely no one can crack the code to making. Many have tried, and there are a lot of mock recipes". This obviously means that only a select few know what is actually in this sauce. For all WE know, it could be anything from liquefied wood to pulverized kangaroo baby's. With any manner of exotic spices....beetle juice, worm vomit, etc. So not knowing what is in this sauce backs up 1) KFC could actually be serving unhealthy food. 2) This sauce, if ingredients revealed, could be any number of repulsive things. Without knowing, there is no hard evidence that this sauce is superior to Church's sauce. 1.C What my opponent said is true, but I would like to re-emphasize an earlier point in this debate. He dropped that Church's chicken is "cooked to perfection" and "mouth watering". This is the signs of true quality. 2 Please allow to clarify my 2nd contention. No new arguments, just clarification. Due to the ever growing famous Kentucky Grilled Chicken, Kentucky Fried Chicken now has competition not amongst other restaurants, but amongst it's own business. This new form of "grilled" chicken is overshadowing the old "fried" chicken. So my point is that unlike KFC, church's chicken is fried, not grilled, thus no competition amongst itself. The fan comment isn't there to attack your chicken, it's too speak of the quality of mine. Extend. --------------------------------------------------------------- His case --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. If you read his source, Church's chicken provides more carbohydrates thus more energy to go burn off the calories. 2. This has no evidence to back up that 1. KFC's chicken is fresh or 2. Church's chicken isn't fresh 3. No evidence of these herbs, doesn't even list them. Just drop that. Also, note, I along with many Americans like a lot of batter. 4. We are talking about KFC chicken not deserts. Drop that. And the form of the chicken doe's not make something superior, more tasteful or better quality. Also Church's has a lot of those forms too. What's "intellegents"? I assume you mean intelligence, and if so I apologize because I do not mean to offend anyone. I'm arguing my point. For a side-note, but very important, since I started this debate, I made the claim that is the resolution, so as Con my opponent has to disprove it. If he doesn't give you sufficient reasons to disprove my claim, then my claim stands. So far he has not. Back to you Con. =). Sources: (1). http://www.chacha.com...... (2). http://www.kfc.com...... (3). http://www.churchs.com...... (4). http://www.churchs.com...... (5). http://en.wikipedia.org...... (6). http://en.wikipedia.org...... (7). http://dictionary.reference.com......