Right Wing Governments, In General, Are Less Moral Than Left Wing Governments

My apologies. It will never take that long to reply again.-------------Rebuttal I: Right Winged Governments V Left-Winged GovernmentsThis is a fallacious statement, assuming that because Left-Winged governments didn't appear until 97 years ago, that these are Right-Winged issues. 1) They were cultural issues, not Government-based at all. The fact the Left-Wing governments can also have slavery tells us that. This doesn't mean that slavery is a Right-Winged thing, just that they were there longer. If it'd had been Left-Winged governments there, they would have had it first. And 2) Right-Winged governments, like Fascism, is rather new as well. These issues are mostly cultural. Remember that if we assume Far-Right governments exist long before, we must accept that it was Far-Right Governments that ended slavery. Pro's argument is more a false generalization.The USSR's death rate was related very much to Stalin's war tactics, albeit the source is a book I can't locate. The Far-Left USSR's cruel tactics lead to many of their war deaths. As for the claim, "The Soviets are responsible for some of the most immoral practices in human history", I didn't link that to a source. Pro is associating one claim to another entirely unrelated claim's source. That source was related to the war, while my claim was related to every non-war claim I made, like "They also planned to kill 20,000,000 Jews in a holocaust of their own, before Stalin died." Another example of Stalin's cruelty was the Katyn massacre, with 22,000 victims in one day. The only reason the USSR didn't kill the same number of people as the Germans was because of the time spent invading. Russian only spent one year in Germany's land before the war ended.Pro questions if North Korea is left-winged. North Korea is one of 5 remaining Communist States remaining (1). By conceding to this point, we've established that Left-Wings can be just as bad as, if not worse than, Right-Winged Government.1) http://geography.about.com...Rebuttal II: Relative MoralityI will inlude both Argument II and Argument III's rebuttal here. Because Pro dropped everything but 2 statements from those 2 arguments, rebuttals for each won't be long enough to warrent two seperate sections. Pro make assumptions about how people may see Morality. The German's believed Russia was more immoral for what they had done. Even today, there are many Anti-Semitic people who would find Stalin's actions more immoral than Hilter killing millions of jews.Pro has reverted to Semantics in his last argument. Just because, say, the USSR wasn't a 'true' communism doesn't mean it isn't Far-Left. True Communism or semi-Communism are both Far-Left. Even then, the USA isn't a true Democracy, but you wouldn't be entirely wrong to call them a Democracy. Every nation I mentioned were still Far-Left, and have done things equally as bad as any Far-Right government.Argument I: Political Terrorism.Far-Left revolutionary armies have been infamously known for their application of Terrorism. It's easily claimed that the policies of the government can been seen in the policies of the group fighting to establish that government. In the US, 24% of all terrorism is committed by Far-Left groups, and another 5% by Communist groups. This equal 29% of all terrorist attacks in the US being caused in the name of Far-Left governments (2).2) http://www.washingtonsblog.com...Conclusion: Pro has attacked only a few of my claims, completely dropping almost every one of my arguments. This includes my argument about Far-Left China and Russia killing 100,000,000 people, and dropping almost the entire bulk of my Argument II.Far-Left Governments have the ability to be just as bad as any Far-Right Government.