No "god" of the bible would be stupid enough to use text as a form of communication

Seasoned beatings. Oh whopppss sorry, I meant to say greetings, Yeah that"s it. Sorry. A deliberate miss-steak on my part. Will you never forgive me? I know shoot me with a brick shipyard. OK I get that you are new at this. So I must let you know right off that bat that youtube links don"t work. You need to provide the text/ name of the video so I and or anyone can copy it into the youtube search engine and thus look the video up via that route. Granted, A few months ago youtube links did work and you could even make the videos be a part of any debate. ONTO business. "The God of the Bible is wise to communicate through written text. " Not if he"s reasonably intelligent. So you ultimately proved that your god is a milk dud at best. But then again you cannot even prove that your god exists in which is the presumption that this debate will go by. "First, My positive argument: Because God said so. " So what? Doesn"t mean that anyone who can out-think your god, Like me and everybody else on the planet has enough brains to not believe is your god "said so" so god didn"t say so. 1. I am a Christian. Absolutely not. We"ll get into that if there"s space in the third RD as it has nothing to do with this debate. Regardless let"s make it simple for now" have you followed your christ and divided your family? Given up ALL of your possessions? Love your enemies? Only a complete basket case, Namely your christ would bark out such ridiculous orders that nobody who is sane can possibly follow. You don"t. To help you out here"s a video for you" https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=x-slAgzJmdU - Why Does Every Intelligent christian disobey jesus? Btw, I didn"t mention jesus, Who was clearly a false prophet, Which we shall get more in depth with of there"s room in RD3, I mentioned god. "No "god" of the bible would be stupid enough to use text as a form of communication" and jesus was not a god in the first place, But a lowly unproved nothing at best. So we can delete the rest of your paragraph. "2. The Bible is self-attesting in its authority. " And yet there"s no evidence to support anything that your god in the bible states except for stories. Anybody can make up stories. To prove it, I"m god. Now prove me wrong. So the bible by that standard is false is one reason why your god would never use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible. "3. "The Bible evidences"" written by someone who didn"t know any other way, Like you. And btw, Your point is? Still doesn"t prove why your god would ---ever--- be stupid enough to use text. I get it also, So by this person"s word, In which you must follow, You believe that he directly had communication with not only the words of the bible but with god himself - correct? Well meet the prophet from who knows where? So this guy was able to talk directly to god and NO ONE else can/ could? So he MUST be correct and EVERYBODY else is wrong, Especially with their interpretations or should I say misinterpretations - correct? Let"s see if you can put that statement through to biblical sciences from around the world and see if you can get anywhere close to a consensus. Bet yah, Yah can"t. Not even close. Because if you could it would have been targeted as being truth in which case its not now is it? Nope. Btw, Let"s make a standing rule and do away with ALL creationists. No exceptions, None. Why? Because they are intelligent. Why? Because they will not put their product, Their god, On trial again. Why? Because they 100% know that they will lose. Why? Because they know that all they have is faith based oriented. They know that faith cannot be proved. Since this is true, Not one court anywhere in this country will accept their case. "Faith is the reason people give when they don"t have evidence. " Matt Dillahunty and he"s right. So since creationists cannot stand behind their product, In other words something that they cannot prove and they know it, It simply means that they cannot be trusted. So any sources that you have are also invalid for the same reasons. "4. The Bible uses claims for itself to be the very word of God" Well I"m god. Prove my words to be false. Second, My negative argument: >NOTHING established in scripture. . . 0 updates. . . You don"t understand because to you there"s only one way of correct interpretations - yours. Let"s prove how wrong you are. * In the Bishop"s bible, The one before the KJV, The word "Tyrant" was used I don"t know how many times (its at least 400 from what completed records show) and then in the KJV that was replaced by "King". WHAT? Tyrant and King are two different and totally apples and oranges with each having totally different meanings. * In Isaiah 45:7 KJV "I form the light, And create darkness: I make peace, And create evil: I the Lord do all these things. " In the NIV version its "I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, The Lord, Do all these things. " In the NLT its "I create the light and make the darkness. I send good times and bad times. I, The Lord, Am the one who does these things. The words "evil" and "disaster" and "bad" are completely 3 completely different words that have 0% of nothing to do with each other and completely change the meaning of the verses. With each different verse, The messages are completely different. The synonyms of each word don"t even match. Those are from English translations only. Think of the total collapse between languages and how mixed upped messages get from language to language in English versions are so screwed up. There"s a few more examples that I can show you if you want. But I think you get the ide nice---and---crystal---clear. Your god if reasonably intelligent, In which he"s clearly not according to you, Would have foreseen all of these fatal errors that not only can but do exist throughout text and would have NEVER used text to begin with. This is a duh situation. So you got your translations ideal completely wrong. Now who"s going to translate it to English, To Swahili, To a children"s version back to the NLT version and then to the Brazilian version and back to those who speak English in Brazil and make sure that the interpretations are correct and sound in which in no possible way are they? Again if your god is reasonably intelligent he would have foreseen though all of these fatalistic errors and NEVER used text, Not for any reason, Not ever. "For the number of copies, " Its not the "number" of copies. Its the diluted copies upon diluted copies. Got it? "But it does not help your case. " Oh it most certainly does. And its NOT my case to begin with. It is those that can think, Reason, Rationalize, Use common sense, Use logic in which case your god has none in which case you cannot even prove exists in the first place, Once again. "There was one original manuscript, Which was probably copied 100 times. " Really? According to what? You? How would you know? Nice guess. Your word "probably" means that you guess outright and that you don"t have any idea and you know it. I really should end this debate right here and now on those grounds alone. I REALLY HATE IT when people flat out invent excuses for something in which they obviously don"t have the faintest clue as to what they are talking about and yet they pretend that they do and because they don"t they have to invent excuses for it and or flat out lie especially to those that know better. In this case I DON"T know better because there was one original and NOBODY knows how many copies were made, IF ANY. But one thing that is for 100% sure is that nobody from today can trace ANY bible back to the original. So NOBODY knows, And that includes you, If they are interpreting correctly. Now suppose that there IS AN ORIGINAL that has survived? That makes things even better as to why your god would NEVER use text for any reason" who is going to interpret from this original so that EVERYBODY on the planet gets and or receives the same exact message that the original has delivered? By language barriers alone, This is an impossibility. https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=KVjmdjSsqZ0&t=163s -"Christians don't understand the character of God" | Stefan - Brooklyn, NY | Atheist Experience #668 "If god is all knowing and he knows the future of all events and he wrote a book that can only be interpreted as if it endorses slavery and if its heinous violence against your children against your neighbors" how could a god be that omnipotent and devise a book where we can"t distinguish between the law of Israel and god"s law? I mean their interwoven where we have metaphor and fact and nobody can distinguish the two. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take figuratively. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take literally. Was it actually a tree? I mean come on. How can anyone distinguish this. I mean come on. It doesn"t make any sense. It doesn"t matter how its translated. It doesn"t matter what version. If it was written by an omnipotent being there would be ONE VERSION. And there would be only ONE WAY to interpret it because it would be written well. " Aron Ra Actually it wouldn"t be written at all. What"s wrong with your god comin" down and talking to people? "Hey you know some of that stuff that"s in the book? I"m here to correct it. " Matt Dillahunty Surely, Once again YOUR god if reasonably intelligent, And once again in no possible way is he, Would have foreseen this truly bombastic fatalistic error and NEVER used text, Not for any reason whatsoever. Now if you cannot figure this simpleton stuff out, No offense, But something is seriously wrong with you and reread everything that has thus far been printed because we haven"t even begun as to why your god would NEVER use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible.