Atheism is more probable than Theism.

I am going to first defend my opening statements and then I will defend my rebuttals. -->DEFENSE OF OPENING STATEMENTS<--1. A and C. My opponent straw man's my entire case. My point is that God's attributes are incoherent and therefore does not exist. I did not at all say that because we cannot comprehend God, He therefore does not exist. Rather, I am saying that God's attributes forbid him to exist in the same way a square circle does not exist. My opponent also straw man's what the Big Bang theory is. The Big Bang Theory states that ""In the distant past, the universe was very dense and hot; since then it has expanded, becoming less dense and cooler. " [1] Indeed, the Big Bang theory explains the development as opposed to the origin of the universe. My case stands because my opponent totally misses the point. Indeed, something can be prime facia incomprehensible, but it can still be true. However, something that has incompatible properties such as a square circle or God, does not exist.2. BOnce again, this is a straw man of my case. If I were to tell you that God told me to be the final prophet on earth and that you are to give everything up and follow me, then you would be rational to conclude that I am lying based soely on the fact that I have given no evidence. Indeed, this attitude of Gods is quite common. For example, Christians do not believe in: Osiris, Isis, Ra, Allah, or any of the other thousands of Gods that have not been proven or disproven yet they do not believe in those gods via the lack of evidence [2]. The conclusion is not "therefore God does not exist" rather the conclusion is therefore "the Claim that God exists may be CONSIDERED false until evidence is provided to the contrary. " -->DEFENSE OF MY REBUTTALS<--1. Cosmological Argument. Something can come from nothing. Moreover, the universe has always existed though it has changed forms. A. Virtual ParticlesMy opponent admits that quantum vacuums do pop out. My opponent, however, misses the point once again. Finally, there is no such thing as a vacuum:In modern physics, there is no such thing as "nothing. " Even in a perfect vacuum, pairs of virtual particles are constantly being created and destroyed. The existence of these particles is no mathematical fiction. Though they cannot be directly observed, the effects they create are quite real. The assumption that they exist leads to predictions that have been confirmed by experiment to a high degree of accuracy [3][T]he laws of physics place no limit on the scale of vacuum fluctuations. The duration is of course subject to the restriction ΔEΔt ~ h, but this merely implies that our Universe has zero energy, which has already been made plausible. [4]Paul Tobin's objection is quite valid. You have not yet proved the fact that you cannot have two infinites. Finally, my opponent once more straw man's. He stated that it doesn't disprove the argument. True, though it fails to meet the burden of proof set forth in this debate. Missing the point once more. Moreover, this argument cannot prove:1. God is omnibenevolent - God could have created the universe to torture people and for his evil deeds.2. God is perfect - God could have Created an imperfect Universe3. God is omnipresent - God could be in only one place at a time as opposed to every place at a time.2. TAGMy opponent plagarized his arguments from Matthew Slick <. http://carm.org...;. As such, I will not address any plagarized arguments. I ask that you take conduct away. Conclusion:1. My opponent straw manned my case2. My opponent plargarized from CARM including the C. S. Lewis quote. I urge a pro vote. References and Footnotes1. Bjorn Feuerbacher and Ryan Scranton. Evidence for the Big Bang Theory. January 25, 2006. <. http://www.talkorigins.org...;2. And also, conceviable the fact of presupposition to their God. 3. Morris, Richard. 1990. The Edges of Science. New York: Prentice Hall.4. Tryon, Edward P. 1973. Is the universe a vacuum fluctuation? Nature 246: 396-397.5. Books above were quoted on <. http://www.infidels.org...;