The Most Accurate Description of Consciousness

You don't seem to be debating, either. You are begging the question, which is an unhealthy form of any type of thinking. At least you're trying, by illustrating a different point of view by using light as a pronouncement of consciousness, rather than the colors themselves, but you could not be anymore wrong because light is merely the result of life and energy flowing - it has no indication of how each color already relates to us emotionally, depending on what mood we are in when we observe each color. Light is when electricity is empowered, like stars; psychologically, this can be demonstrated by analyzing the behavioral patterns of mankind, and how losing control over their energy results in a metaphoric black hole which causes them to fall indefinitely, vying for nothing and feeding off of everything, exactly how a star loses control, dies and creates a black hole or super nova, like those people who go on a killing spree to end it with a big bang. Most people don't know how to escape this vicious cycle, which again, points to the right direction of my consensus, as when people finally escape, they create a new beginning. I am aware of the melatonin chemicals, I just don't agree with the different name, just like I don't agree with how positively and negatively charged atoms are called ions, rather than atom + or atom -, or how the bone material that creates pearls are just a variant form of the bone material for the human body. People need to stop calling high similarities completely unsimilar names. It is that simple. Consciousness is not the experience - consciousness is the experiencing resulting as an experience, that we assume to be one, but yet is not. We are observers which observe the already observed world. Our brain is already built to make all the connections we do, because it already knows everything. It matters what we "will" the brain to connect with. We are not the system, nor are we the controller - we are the wires and the connections which make it so. We are inside it all, and experiencing it from the inside, which is why we can relate to the Universe inside out, by thinking outwards and reflecting from within by managing the information we've absorbed. The Universe defines us - we do not define it. To say that "we" are experiencing, is like saying that "we" are thinking, in spite of the notion of which ideas come to us - we do not come to them. When we think, it matters what is consciously available, and what is not. It does not matter what we want to be available, but rather how willful we are towards what information we want at the time. If we think deep enough and patient enough, things will eventually surface - most of the time, however, things surface without our consent. We are not controlling anything; we are the control... experiencing the controlling. We are not the ocean, but we are the waves and the motion of the ocean. We are not the volcano, but we are the rupturing and the explosive tendency of this volcano. We harbor the energies via reaction and connection via will and "control", which is merely us following the governing rules of the Universe in a way that is very inconspicuous. We only have so much we can do with our emotions and thoughts. To say that we are experiencing, rather than being the result of an already observed experience, is to say that we are being, not benign, in spite of all the evidence which points towards the notion of which we do not know anything, we do not define ourselves, there is no "I", all of such is merely a mirage based on ignorance and misinterpretation of reality and what we assume to be "our" experience", while not acknowledging the very premise that this brain that we use already has all the connections to the Universe - it matters what we connect it to, which triggers these experiential points. The Universe is us - therefore, consciousness and everything else can be described and cross-referenced without any effort, whence your knowledge is not literal, but metaphorical. We live in a Universe which wears cosmic masks and acts like a chameleon of the stars. It changes form, and size, but the same faculties behind it all remain. As above, so below; from form, to faculty; to, and fro.