WAR GAME SCENARIO: United States v. Chosen Nation

None of the NATO countries will realistically join Switzerland, as they are all aligned towards the United States, nor will any major non-NATO ally or any countries aligned toward the United States. All the citizenship given to people have to be dual citizenship with their own countries. Therefore, they are considered part of those countries. As DIRECT INTERVENTION is not allowed, this is still considered false. Nonetheless, I will show you the flaws of this scenario:In response to the passing of the bill and the speculation of the bill, all other nations of the EU pass similar laws that say that all citizens of their home country are hereby citizens of Switzerland and are placed under their laws and actions WHILE RETAINING CITIZENSHIP AND RESIDING RIGHTS of their mother country.While this is technically allowed, 22 of the 28 EU member states are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization of which Switzerland is not a member. As all NATO members are aware of individual military actions of each other, 22 US-aligned states of the EU are aware of the "increasing hostility from the United States." In a realistic situation, therefore, NATO is politically an enemy of Switzerland. While it cannot exercise direct intervention, it realistically will not support Switzerland in any political or economic way. Therefore, 22 EU member states, i.e. 77.57% vote in the EU, will be against this strengthening of ties with a United States enemy and, therefore, a NATO enemy. By rules 19 and 9, every aspect of the war must be realistic. This aspect is completely unrealistic. Donations from the private citizens of the EU and the rest of the world amount to $13 billion.It is likely that all 28 NATO member states will ban donation to Switzerland. Therefore, 22 of 28 EU nations will not supply donations and it is likely that nations such as Germany, France, and UK can supply the most money. To ensure fair relations with NATO, the EU will ban donations entirely in a realistic situation, as will the 53 Commonwealth nations, being economically supportive of the UK's allies. Therefore, this aspect is also entirely unrealistic. Rebuttals:Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Israel, Pakistan, India, South Africa, and Brazil are the countries most heavily dependent on the United States, along with all NATO and EU members, and Mexico. According to a political analysis, China is careful not to DIRECTLY antagonize the United States because its economy is 175.6% dependent on the United States. [1] All the BRICS nations and the stock markets of various countries are heavily reliant on the USD. [2] Therefore, for fear of economic retaliation, most UN member states will declare the Swiss proclamation invalid to their nation and forbid donations and drafting of troops.Therefore, as these scenarios are unrealistic, by Rule 9, I give you a warning and declare your moves in Round 1 void. Any further violation will result in Con's complete debate forfeiture. I allow Con to strengthen her defenses in Round 2 without making offensive moves. I will begin the war in Round 3.Sources:[1] http://www.forbes.com...;[2] http://orientalreview.org...;