People with AIDS should be shot into the space.

First, I'd like to ask that people vote off of better argumentation, rather than what they personally believe think, even if the PRO seems a bit totalitarian. AIDS is a big epidemic, yet we still have no cure. So, what is the best way to eliminate the disease? Complete eradication. Contentions: 1.) By shooting people with AIDS into the space, we will almost completely get rid off the disease. Of course, it will still lurk in the dark corners and such, but for the most part, people will no longer have to live in fear. Of course, we'll have to figure out who has AIDS first, so we'll have to test everyone for AIDS. Those who turn up positive will be shot up straight into space. Then, they need to stay clean for five years, at which point everyone will be tested again. This method keeps the AIDS epidemic to a minimum, thsus keeping society much more efficient. 2.) Since any cure is a long way off, it is cost-effective to build a series of simple rocket ships to launch our infected into space, rather than suffer the long-term costs of trying to find a cure or trying to keep these people with AIDS alive. Building enough rockets to simply get these people into orbit wouldn't be that expensive in the long-term. We don't even have to make it so they have a living space inside. They're going to wind up being space debris anyway, so we can save even more money by simply strapping the infected to the outside of the rocket and hitting the launch button. My opponent may try to argue that we can't waste fuel like that, but we must remember that if we keep these people alive, they'll just keep driving until they die of natural causes, consuming more and more fuel. Imagine if we can put two hundred or more people on a one-time use rocket that only needs to reach space. The fuel that that would take compared to the fuel it would take to allow these people to keep driving for the rest of their lives is extremely small. The economic benefits clearly lie with the PRO. 3.) The world is overpopulated as it is. By performing this genocide, we greatly reduce this problem. My opponent might argue that AIDS actually helps people die, being a disease, and so it helps to reduce the problem of world population. But we must remember, AIDS doesn't kill anyone, it simply makes potential diseases worse. However, someone sitting around with AIDS might never get sick. By launching them into space, we are assuring their death. Furthermore, more diseases would have to be a real borderline between deadly and not deadly in order for AIDS to make enough of a difference to significantly decrease the world's population. For example, if I have AIDS and cancer, I will die. If I have just cancer, I will die. But, if I have AIDS and a sore throat, I probably won't die, as AIDS wouldn't be sufficient enough to make this more common illness fatal. 4.) This provides much more of an incentive for safe-sex. People obviously don't care as much about getting STDs as they should. By making getting AIDS punishable by death, people will have a much greater incentive to practice safe-sex, thus reducing the outbreak of other STDs and also further helping the overpopulation problem by resulting in fewer pregnancies. 5.) The PRO also helps to fight heroin addiction. You can also get AIDS through a dirty needle. A junky will think twice about shooting up if he knows that if he accidentally contracts AIDS, he will die as soon as the government finds out. This measure against AIDS is also a huge step in the War on Drugs. Thank you.