The Debate Challenge

Well done, incredible job con. (yeah, you can just post "I forfeit this round" to make the debate faster)In GCL's debate: " Forfeited out of respect", says the first voter. And beside, GCL even said she didn't agree on the topic.RT9119's debate: seriously? RT's an insanely smart dude. He forfeited on purpose to make his argument stronger! Furthermore, that was a troll debate. Troll debates can be won in a gazillion ways. Unfortunately this is not a troll debate. It's a challenge where you automatically lose conduct (forfeit not because you didn't want to argue on the side you didn't agree on, but on purpose because it was a challenge, and accepting the challenge, you abide by the rules).I agree with your ability to "sly underhand" attack me in the last round, so I will actually use as much of the 8000 characters I can to make arguments. Thank you for mentioning the Gish Gallop. This round I will exactly use that argument. Next round I will provide actual solid evidence, so you need to defeat "the troll argument" and "the solid argument" all in one round.http://rationalwiki.org...Onto "The Troll Argument"! 52 reasons why Sswdwm cannot win this debate 1. he only has a 62.50% win percentage 2. his name is really really weird. No offense dude. 3. Sswdwm's name is really really hard to type up. No offense. 4. his elo is at an measly 2,105 5. there are debaters at 8000!! 6. it can be concluded from 4 and 5 that he's not that good of a debater 7. no one whom has forfeited even one round has won against me 8. 9spaceking requires much effort to win against, as can be seen from http://www.debate.org... 9. 9spaceking is serious on this debate. 10. 9spaceking agrees on this topic 11. 9spaceking has technically only lost 2 debates where he was serious and agreed on his side of the topic 12. thus, sswdwm cannot win because of 9, 10 and 11 13. his profile pic. is hard to see 14. he is interested in women 15. he isn’t gay 16. gay is essentially not wrong 17. sswdwm is wrong 18. wrong=false 19. sswdwm has made false claims in round 1 20. sswdwm will not win because of his false information 21. 9spaceking has made no grammar mistakes (because he pointed them out and he is false) 22. everything is awesome! Everything is good when you’re part of a team! 23. sswdwm’s username does not contain any letter from “Everything” 24. sswdwm is a person, not everything 25. sswdwm is not awesome. No offense. 26. sswdwm is not part of a team, as far as I’m concerned. 27. sswdwm isn’t good. No offense. 28. sswdwm uses Wikipedia. 29. Wikipedia is not a credible source. 30. that means sswdwm is only 9/10 credible. 31. GCL’s debate has been explained. 32. RT9119’s debate has been explained. 33. sswdwm is now only 7/10 credible. 34. 7/10 is a “C minus” 35. C minus will get you to no good college 36. sswdwm’s argument won’t even get him into a good college 37. sswdwm has not been in a good college 38. sswdwm has bad education 39. I go to TJHSST 40. TJHSST is the best school (sometimes second best) of US 41. I have awesome grades at TJHSST 42. I currently have an awesome education 43. awesome education>bad education 44. I will win over sswdwm 45. sswdwm likes badminton 46. badminton is my 2cd favorite sport 47. therefore sswdwm is only 2cd best to me 48. sswdwm doesn’t support a president 49. sswdwm therefore doesn’t support a democracy 50. sswdwm is therefore horrible. No offense intended. 51. nobody votes for horrible people 52. back to you! Oh wait, you can’t rebut back! Muhahahahaha!