Sniperjake1994 is a conservative.

Thank you sir for accepting this, No problem I enjoy debating. I'm still rusty from not debating for months. So bear with me, thanks. I will. 1. Counter evidence: I'm true to what I have on my profile. Example: I am 15/sophomore. I apologize but you are not an accurate representation of all society. People due lie, you merely say that you are 15, this could be one truth amidst thousands of lies that we don't know about and you are unwilling to shed light on. However there is absolutely no evidence to support this claim. You could be lying just to win this debate. Seeing as this is a key area of debate I offer the following surveys to validate my logic and thus prove my side true. [http://www.truthaboutdeception.com...] [http://www.human-nature.com...] In short they prove that while lying may or may not be genetically encoded it is an adaptation made to survive, and achieve goals (like winning this debate, or fitting in) 2. But he still leans more to the right than the middle. We both agree in 87% of the issues. And I've taken tests that show I am conservative and because we agree a lot then he is also more of a conservative. Exactly he has conservative views, you never refute the claim that he could be a conservative moderate, who pledges his allegiance just to join a party and fill in a bubble. This shows that you are reiterating my position, that he is not a conservative or liberal rather something in between. B) His ideology states: CONSERVATIVE. And I've posted a comment/question on his profile. This question was never answered, mind you. So once again we don't have any support for the claim. But furthermore even if the question was answered we would not be able to verify it as truth. We don't know wether you too are in cahoots, conspiring to beat me, and willing to lie to do so. But even though he did put conservative as his ideology we can not tell why. There are a great variety of reasons why one might put something else as their political ideology when in actuality this is not the truth, the following are a few possibilities: 1) Right wing snipers threatening his life unless he alters his ideology and joins the conservative group 2) He could be a wayward boy, lost and along desperately trying to find someone to accept him, and under ideologies it just so happened that "Conservative" was early on in the list. 3) Someone could have hacked his account. 4) It could have been a bet, dare, or practical joke. So as we can see just because it is on a profile does not make it true. 3. Alright! Someone believes Bush wasn't a failure. The wars are somewhat justified too. Yes I agree with this statement but it was never argued that I am a liberal! This proves too things that conservative views make a conservative not. a) Bush is a conservative and he supports Bush therefore he is a conservative. As I showed with my example I agreed he was not a complete failure but does that mean I am a conservative or support him? No, it simply doesn't. The logic does not allow for a conclusion of this nature. No where does Sniperjake1994 state he supports Bush, and even if he had we couldn't ever verify the claim. b) Claims can be backed by facts. Which in no case were they, so you have failed to uphold the burden of proof. Also please extend the Duck analysis which shows how all the "Logica" presented by the PRO holds no weight and is untrue. So we ought to vote CON for the following reasons: 1. We can't verify claims 2. My opponent failed to uphold the burden of proof. 3. Duck analysis shows that even if the majority of the evidence was extended and found true, which is impossible, we still can vote CON. Therefore Sniperjake1994 is not a conservative.