Cate vs Doge

Rule BreakingAs usual, my opponent still has not changed their profile picture to that of Doge. I have uploaded the third and final evidence to show at no point during this debate was she ever using the correct Doge picture. This violates Rule #1. Closing StatementMy opponent still fails to recognize the context of the words. Words have multiple meanings. Take god for example. Merriam's Webster Dictionary provides these definitions of god: http://www.merriam-webster.com...Full Definition of GOD 1: capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: as a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe b Christian Science : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind 2: a being or object believed to have more than natural attributes and powers and to require human worship; specifically : one controlling a particular aspect or part of reality 3: a person or thing of supreme value 4: a powerful ruler Not even with these four definitions of the word "god" does Merriam's Webster Dictionary cover all the uses of said word.Here is a link to a few debates on this website where they use the word "god" and it is defined as something not in the Webster's Dictionary: 1. http://www.debate.org...2. http://www.debate.org... (Refer to round 2 by Envisage to see a direct statement about the definition of god)3. http://www.debate.org...4. http://www.debate.org...This is a proof of concept. A word can have multiple definitions, even ones outside the Webster's Dictionary. The context is a great determinant to see the proper definition of a *debatable* word. Cate and Doge as used in Round 1 are examples of the Cate and Doge memes in the way in which they were used. Also note how each definition given in these debates is different from eachother. A word can take on multiple meanings depending on the context of the situation.My opponent fights a straw man in debating about why we shouldn't use Cate and Doge's definition from the Urban Dictionary. She mistakenly presumes that using Urban Dictionary is credible in all situations. I have never said this. It all depends on context. Using the Google dictionary definition for the word "meme" was justified in the context it was used in.The "two sides of the debate must be similar" argument still holds true. If the topics were per say, Waffles vs Pancakes, they hold multiple similarities. Both are common breakfast foods. Both commonly are used with syrup and butter. Both are eaten on a plate with a fork and a knife. Cate and Doge (the memes, as they have always been since Round 1) are both memes. They both are used for similar purposes as memes. Both are still pictures plastered with words such as "wow" "much" and "amaze." Both are animals. There is more, however the point is achieved. For the definitions that Con has provided, the similarities would be incredibly generic in that the description fits a large host of objects. A delicacy and the chief magistrate of Venice or Genoa would have some of these similar characteristics. They are both made of matter. They both adhere to the 4 fundamental laws of physics. Both are concrete objects. Both take up space. Now, come up with as many similarities as you possibly can and write them down about those two. Go to some random person and ask if they can define at least one of the words that you are describing. If they are unable to, the words probably don't have much in common. Finally I may bring closure to that argument, which still holds true.The capitalization of the words "Cate" and "Doge" in Round 1 give a large amount of evidence showing that my proposed definitions are correct. There is no evidence indicating that these were grammatical mistakes, given that they were committed with consistency. There are also no other grammatical mistakes in Round 1. My opponent can't simply assume it is a grammatical mistake and brush it off. This argument still holds true.All three of my arguments in deciding why my definition of Cate and Doge hold true. Con has not refuted them.Con has not made any argument as to why Doge is better than Cate. At the very least, we are tied, setting aside the rule breaking. However, since Con has clearly broken Rule #1 multiple times, this gives me a for sure victory, even if all my arguments were completely void as to why Cate is better than Doge.And with that, I bring closure to all of my arguments.Vote Pro.Request (Note: This is NOT a rebuttal)"I remind the reader that I asked my opponent if he could have the "you must have a picture of [the side that you are debating for]" rule imposed upon him, because it severely limits my freedoms as a person on DDO. He replied no, which is very unsportsmanlike, and I am utterly astonished that he is not taking the picture of a cate. I ask the voter to take this unsportsmanlike behavior into account while voting."I can't believe my opponent has the audacity to claim that I have unsportsmanlike behavior. My opponent accepted this debate to do nothing more than troll. First of all, when you accepted the debate, you accepted the rules. By no means am I obligated to change the rules just because you think it is unfair. That is something you work out in the comments section before accepting the debate. Second of all, you and I know very well what definitions were intended in this debate. Instead, you are using a loophole and arguing only from that. You were only trying to stir trouble when you initially accepted this challenge. I completely regret ever making this debate thanks to you. Third, you are asking for points since I refused to do your request? Where is the logic in this? Voters, please ignore this unjustified request.