Our greatest taboo should be permitted for investigation and debate

This will be my final round. Thanks for reading. NUREMBERG AND BEYOND "If you don't tell us [where your husband is] we'll turn you over to the Russians and they'll put you before a firing-squad. Your son will go to Siberia." - B. Clarke, British Sgt.[1] My opponent claims that "12 prominent Nazis" were hanged in October, 1986, when it was actually 10, and fails to mention that 10 more Nazis were given a range of prison sentences or were set free at that very same sentencing [2]. Hoess didn't know what his fate would be. After being sentenced, in a letter to his wife, he writes [3]: "...I was totally responsible for everything that happened there, whether I knew about it or not. Most of the terrible and horrible things that took place there I learned only during this investigation and during the trial itself." Hoess' testimony was one of the greatest contributions to the Holocaust storyline, making the legal defense "I didn't know" or "it didn't happen" even less tenable for the accused. As with the repeatedly-cited Jaeger Report, my opponent attempts to justify an absolute lack of physical evidence with questionable testimony. He claims the document contains no verifiable elements because it is a copy, not an original-- how do we know this? Even if it were an "original", how much weight would it be given if there exists not a single shred of physical evidence to support it? MASS GRAVES My opponent claims that irrefutable evidence to Jewish extermination cannot be uncovered, despite several exact locations being known, because of "Jewish law". Yet, exhumations of Jewish graves are done regularly [4]: "The Jewish Burial Society is responsible for exhumation of remains." "...obtain the consent of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel for exhumation of the remains of persons of the Jewish faith." Clearly, evidence can only be exhumed if Jewish institutions want it to be. Why wouldn't the buried victims and their descendents want to put an end to all of the "Denier" claims, not to mention giving these individuals a proper burial? The best we are said to have is radar images that show holes in the ground-- "no actual bodies were found and the graves were not excavated"-- shocking. Yet, the lead investigator, probably not to leave empty-handed, claims to have personally witnessed crushed bones in the soil, which conforms to the storyline that these 850,000 bodies were buried, then dug up out of the soil, burned on wooden pyres, just to have roughly 9 million pounds of apparently human remnants be re-buried in the same place. Of course, there were not many trees in the area surrounding Treblinka, meaning that roughly 10,000 boxcars of wood would have needed to be sent in by train (of which there is no evidence for)-- all so that the bodies could be burned before being re-buried again. These claims are incredible [5]. GAS VANS To fit the alleged fatal CO exposure time of less than 30 minutes in these 'gas vans', the concentration would need to remain at roughly 0.8%. Since diesel engines are capable of producing no more than 0.4%, witnesses such as Shimon Srebrnik, as cited by my opponent, claim that the throttle would be 'floored' to deprive victims of oxygen, rather than kill by CO "as planned". My opponent has still yet to suggest why 'producer gas'(up to 35% CO) or even plain gasoline (7% CO) engines were not used for this purpose. Producer gas vehicles were extremely common in military operations and abroad during WWII [6] and would have been quite efficient for heavy-duty tasks [7]. Furthermore, diesel engines are extremely complex to operate, even more difficult to repair and would have been prone to significant damage if used as alleged [8]. The technologically-brilliant Germans would not have compromised such a task with senseless design. GAS CHAMBERS My opponent clearly doesn't understand the implications of my prior argument. Markiewicz measured only free-form cyanide-- he did not account for stable iron-cyanide compounds. Free-form cyanide is extremely susceptible to weathering, showing a significant decay over time, while iron-cyanide compounds are practically insoluble [9]. Moreover, according to Rudolf: "Care was taken to ensure that samples were only taken from material not exposed to weathering... exemplified by the deposition of spider webs many years old and the absence of any trace of lime precipitation on the concrete or mortar, which would be caused by rain water" [9]. Con's source shows only that soluble cyanide was extremely near-zero in all locations tested, yet below the limit of detection in the control samples. This is due to Markiewicz's irresponsible analysis method. In the data collected by Rudolf, Leuchter and Ball, who accounted for *total* cyanide, inmate barracks(serving as control samples) showed only slightly lower levels of cyanide concentration than any alleged 'gas chamber'(keep in mind, all buildings were fumigated for typhus with cyanide), while delousing chambers had concentrations thousands of times higher [9]. The slight variation between control and 'gas chamber' samples is probably due to the fact that the alleged 'chambers' were within a morgue-- a housing for dead typhus victims. EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY One would not expect such highly-regarded testimony to be so inconsistent. In addition to notable variations in detail, many witnesses have made claims that are too extravagant to be believed by anyone. Consider this list of actual source-cited testimony from 'survivors' that is literally beyond words: http://tinyurl.com... Here are the citations: http://tinyurl.com... This excellent documentary further illustrates the manipulative effect of false testimony: http://tinyurl.com... Not everyone lied, but some did (either as individuals, for revenge, or a collective motive such as Zionism), and those that didn't may not question the storyline propagated by others, potentially leading to an assumption that, for example, a relative that they have not seen since internment was 'gassed' or otherwise. My opponent cited the Yad Vashem website as being 'evidence' of 4 million victims, despite the fact that this database can be manipulated by anyone [10]: "...contributors can sit down at a computer... and click on 'submit new pages of testimony.' Up comes a form for the victim's name or names, place of birth, profession, wartime 'travails' (deportation, ghetto, camp, death march, hiding, escape, resistance), approximate age at death and other details." Consider an "Adolf Hitler" entry submitted by a member of the CODOH Forum on this thread: http://tinyurl.com... Are any of these listed names verifiable with tangible evidence? Of course not. WHAT REALLY HAPPENED? Jewish organizations dominated German industry and media to a similar disproportion of what is reflected in the US, today [11]. Once the German economy was at stake, Hitler attempted to emigrate the Jews out of the Reich with the Haavara Agreement [12], among other initiatives. Jews were used for slave labor. Allied bombing in Germany and elsewhere led to the Germans abandoning provisions at these camps nearing the end of the war. IN CONCLUSION Despite the fact that there exists no physical evidence of 'extermination', criticism of elite Jewish institutions is chastised heavily in the name of the "Holocaust", permitting free reign of Jewish dominance, void of any critique. I hope that the audience is able to agree that this discussion is not an "incitement of hatred"; it is a quest for uncompromising truth. Thank you for your consideration. REFERENCES 1. http://tinyurl.com... 2. http://tinyurl.com... 3. http://tinyurl.com... 4. http://tinyurl.com... 5. http://tinyurl.com... 6. http://tinyurl.com... 7. http://tinyurl.com... 8. http://tinyurl.com... 9. http://tinyurl.com... 10. http://tinyurl.com... 11. http://tinyurl.com... 12. http://tinyurl.com...