Does God exist

Thanks for your rebuttal con, You argue there is no evidence for God. First I must ask what kind of evidence are you looking for? If you want scientific evidence I must warn you science can"t explain everything. For example prove to me science is the correct methodology? You can"t scientifically prove it you just accept it as fact since it"s a presupposition. Now with your rebuttals. 1. You say the universe isn"t contingent? Tell me why does the universe exist as it does and why is there something rather than nothing? You say the universe doesn"t need a cause since the laws of physics before the Big Bang than they are now? Are you suggesting the universe came from nothing? If so nothing cannot become something since nothing has zero attributes it does not have the faculty to become something. Laws of physics or no laws of physics absolute nothingness is impossible since something exists and we can"t even conceive nothing. What colour is it? Black? White? Those are something. Something must exist because nothing is logically impossible. Even if something like nothing existed it would be something if it had the ability to turn to something since an ability counts as something. And things don"t pop into existence since that is equal to something to coming from nothing which we agreed is impossible. And just because we don"t know the cause doesn"t mean there is no cause! And the laws of physics? Who made these laws? The laws of the road don"t make themselves up so how can the laws of physics? Where are they? Why do we have to obey them? And if they just came after the Big Bang spontaneously? Why don"t they randomly disappear spontaneously? And even if the universe could come from nothing it is still contingent? Why does nothing turn to something? Why doesn"t it remain nothing? The question why proves the universe is contingent and not default. And even if there was no time before the Big Bang how did time start? And why doesn"t it randomly stop or speed up for no reason or slow down for no reason? My point remains the universe is contingent. 2 you didn"t disprove the ontological argument. Obviously existence beats non existence. If superman doesn"t exist he can"t hurt me. God by definition is the greatest being. A god that exists is better than a god that doesn"t exist therefore by definition god exists. My argument still holds. 3 you claim leptons, Quarks, Higgs boson, Etc explain indivisible reality? They don"t tell me what are quarks made of? And what is the space in between them made of? Absolute reality can"t be made of parts it must be indivisible because you can"t be part real. 4. You haven"t negated absolute truth either. My question was, Is all truth relative? Or is there an ultimate absolute truth. All truth can"t be relative, Because then there would be no objective truth only subjective opinions. The fact absolute truth exists proves an absolute exists. This absolute must have being just as a rock has being. Being does not equal person since all things that exist have being I prove the being that created this world is also a person but you didn"t rebut this point. If this being had a choice to create this universe it must be sentient. If it had no choice it was preprogrammed thus itself created. All my points still stand.