BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
American Military Spending Should be Reduced

First; here's a pie graph of the US budget: As you can see; more than half of the US budget goes to military; approximately 600 billion.Heres a comparison of the defense spending of the top 6 military spenders: China spends more money on defense than an country other than the United States, but the United States still spends almost 4 TIMES AS MUCH AS CHINA.Why does America need to spend more money on defense than the next 5 greatest spenders put together!That is the reason why military spending needs to be reduced; we don't need a military the size of 5 OTHER COUNTRIES PUT TOGETHER!
Did George W. Bush Play A Role in 9/11

Reptilian shape-shifting aliens Former athlete and sportscaster David Icke has proposed that a race of reptilian, shape-shifting extraterrestrials is bent on world domination and subjugating the human race to slavery. Icke attributes a number of world catastrophes to the aliens, including 9/11. Icke began a new series of speaking engagements in late 2014 entitled "9/11 was an inside job". Therefore reptiles did the job
Did George W. Bush Play A Role in 9/11

In the sweep of history, George W. Bush will be seen as one of our greatest presidents because of the decisions he made to keep us safe after 9/11. Few outside the intelligence community recognize the enormity of those decisions. But Bush"s proclamation just after the terrorist attack that any country harboring a terrorist will be considered a terrorist country alone meant that Arab countries began cooperating in the war on terror, turning over thousands of terrorists and leads. Two days after the attack, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III and Attorney General John Ashcroft began to brief Bush. "They talked about how the terrorists got plane tickets, got on planes, moved from one airport to another, and then attacked our citizens," Andy Card, Bush"s chief of staff, told me for my book "The Secrets of the FBI." "And the president, while he was very interested in that report, said, "Mr. Director, that"s building a case for prosecution. I want to know what you have to say about the terrorist threats that haven"t materialized yet and how we can prevent them."" Mueller took the message back to headquarters: Instead of simply responding to an attack, interdict them. Of course, the FBI had always sought to prevent terrorist attacks before they occurred. But under former FBI Director Louis Freeh"s leadership, the FBI tended to treat each incident as a separate case instead of recognizing the larger threat and mounting an effort against the entire al-Qaida organization, as the bureau had done with the Ku Klux Klan and the Mafia. On top of that, before 9/11, because of relentless media criticism and a lack of clear authority under Justice Department guidelines, the FBI had become so gun shy and politically correct that even though terrorists were known to hatch their plots in mosques, the FBI was averse to following suspects there. Under the guidelines in place before 9/11, FBI agents could not even look at online chat rooms to develop leads on people who might be recruiting terrorists or distributing information on making explosives. The FBI had to first determine that there was a sound investigative basis before it could sign on to chat rooms any 12-year-old could enter. "We were told before 9/11 that we were not allowed to conduct investigative activity on the internet, even though it"s public," Arthur M. "Art" Cummings II, who headed counterterrorism investigations, says. "Same thing with a mosque. It"s a gathering open to the public, but we were absolutely precluded from going into a mosque as an FBI agent. And precluded from having a source in a mosque report on anything in the mosque, or look at anything in the mosque, unless we had a specific target within the mosque." In 2005, Bush established the National Counterterrorism Center in McLean, Va., where 200 analysts from the CIA and FBI sit side by side analyzing threats 24 hours a day. A secure video conference takes place three times a day with all members of the intelligence community and the White House to analyze threats and parcel out leads. This is why he didnt have a role in 9/11
Doctor Who is stupid

I will respond to the points at face value: "The plots make no scents" If you were looking for the programme to produce some sort of odour, then that's perhaps more a reflection on you than it is on the show. "Most seasons have many episodes where they pretty much have the same plot ... but only different companions" You can't criticise a show for continuity. I'd be pretty angry if the Doctor just morphed into a talking giraffe in order to break up the action. Great Britain. Take the hint.
Yama would make the Superior ruler

1. Yama is Supreme -Self Explanatory2. Yama is an accomplished military leader-Do I even need to go into this broja? Have yourself some facts.-List of Yama's achievements-Killed the Terrorist Makarov - Hanging-Killed the Cyberdemon - Bullets-Killed Mecha-Hitler - Sudden death upon realization of what he was going up against -Note: Proceeded to have relations with the skulls of Hitler and Eva Braun. Followed by accidentally burning most of Berlin to the ground during a "Victory Fire".-Nuked Megaton-Note: Lit a cigar and laughed as it burned-Nuked Tenpenny Tower -Note: Lit a cigar and laughed as it burned-Ended the Incidents of Gensokyo-Scarlet Mist Incident -Note: Proceeded to sleep with every resident of the Scarlet Mansion as any true patriot would-Spring Snow Incident-Night Parade of One Hundred Oni Every Four Days-Eternal Night Incident-Sixty Year Cycle Great Barrier Incident-Genso-Lunar War-Vampire Incident-The Great Barrier Disturbance-Second Lunar War-Hakurei Shrine event-Hakurei Shrine event (second)-Mysterious ruins event-Hakurei shrine event (third)-Makai invasion event-Killed the Ender Dragon-Elder Scrolls Campaign-Killed Alduin-Note: ... had relations with soul of deceased.-Prevent Dagon from entering Nirn-Stopped the plot of Jagar Tharn-Killed 1st Dragonborn-Killed Vivic-Killed Dagoth Ur-Ended Bloodmoon-Killed the Tribunal-Lead the sacking of Windhelm-Fallout Campaign:-Forced the Master to Rage Quit on life-United Capital Wasteland in glorious genetic purity-United Mojave desert under his glorious rule-Blew the Enclave to China-Mikal campaign:-Forced Mikal to rage quit -Note: Proceeded to mentally T-Bag him-Kidnapped Santa - Proved Santa was real http://www.youtube.com...These glorious feats, along with the victories of Prussia over its enemies during the rule of the Hohenzollern idictate a simple truth. The rule of the Hohenzollern line should be reinstated on a global scale with King Yama as its leader.
Yama would make the Superior ruler

Well, I apologize for the forfeit. I'll accept a loss of conduct points for that, but I still have the opportunity to win on the other judging criteria established by DDO.Anyway, let's stop distracting ourselves with my opponent's arguments and go back to the-world-of-things-that-actually-happen. You will then understand why I am the better ruler.Since the debate was never defined, it's still up to interpretation, which means I'm going to define it as "someone who has a position of command over other people" [1]Rebuttal:I'm not sure how a ruler (measuring tool) could do all the things that a ruler (commander) needs to do. I mean, he can either be a great warrior or a ruler, but he can't be both.He needs to make up his mind.Personal qualifications:I actually am a ruler:I am the Troll Queen, and I'm already in place to become the Troll Goddess of Reason once my time has passed. I have written out a constitution for the Troll Kingdom, and I have recruited several users as knights.I am already gifted with leading as is shown by my history as a troll.I am the High Prophet of the Great Morgan Freeman:I mean, all I have to do is say it's true, and it's true [2]Unless one of you blasphemers wants to claim superior knowledge to that of the Great Morgan Freeman. PMF.I am a great warrior:Some time ago the user Mikal set up a pokemon style challenge. The goal was to for a user to transcend all forms of debate, including troll debating. Each user had to defeat all holders of the badges respective to their form of debate then challenge the top four debaters. I was the holder of the trolling badge. There was no one who was able to defeat me.I rule my opponent:P1: My opponent is a troll.P2: I am the Troll Queen.C: I rule my opponent.Bam.Nuff said.Anyway thanks for reading this argument. I am still in this thing.Sources:[1] Jonbonbon's Unabridged Dictionary[2] The Great Morgan Freeman
The Kalam Cosmological Argument Is Sound

Rules/ StipulationsThe burden will be on Pro to demonstrate that the KCA is a sound argument. My burden is to undermine the argument, and/ or the support for it. The first round will not be for acceptance, as my opponent will make his opening argument in the first round. However, in round 4, Pro must simply put:"No argument will be posted here as agreed."PS. My opponent does not have to show that any hypothetical cause must be personal, just that the universe has a cause.
The concept of gods, religion & supernatural arose to explain what was not yet understood.

actualy the quistion is what is purpose of life?why we should live if we should die?the question is only in religion, and scientist just base on factnow i ask you how about the miracle happend, life baby from 5th floor fall down but isn't die? and how about this http://www.youtube.com...even scientist can't explain the miracles happen, but for religion people, of course they know that. Their faith tell them, and even it's unconsciously. and about the Noah's ark. in that web say it base on geological, but how about the big flood, after noah and the others get out from the ark, of course the flood isn't finish yet, and there are earthquake happend so it means that the ark isn't stay still. the ark move because of natural disaster.and about God, God is true, so who create us? who create this nature? is all this happend suddenly? of course not. if you say that evolution and scientific inquiry will lead to more complete, but what's the fact? still there are so many missing link. even expert claim expert, so what is the true? many expert just pretend because just search the popularity like when i said in the first round. and there are so many people become believe to God because God Already give them the faith and not just that, many people also have experience meet God, but when they talk to many people, they don't believe it. so because of that , Bible is proven. to be a good People or Right people isn't easy, they must through many block, and that's become true.and you said that"Evil spirits and exorcisms are "shows" to deal with (usually) psychological disorders that the ancients did not understand and many today refuse to understand"yeahh they refuse to understand it because they can't understand it without faith. if you ask faith people, they won't answer you, but they understand with their faith. so the death, all religion will say they afterlife is Hell or heaven.many people fear to death but if people have faith they won't but isn't mean they will suicide. even many people don't know about death, where will they go, but the purpose is just two, hell or heaven. and if people really want to prove with all science , you can't prove it. because it's not about science, it's about supernatural. so scientist can't describe it. because science isn't prove all thing because they just base on fact. many people don't believe it so because of that many scientist want to search it, and it can't be prove. and if you won't believe it, it's better if you read the Book "heaven is so real"http://heavenissorealbook.blogspot.com...and it will prove That God is real, you'll know where we will go after death
The concept of gods, religion & supernatural arose to explain what was not yet understood.

With regard to the finding of Noah"s Ark, it is not true: http://www.snopes.com... Accepting that "God" had to come first because the Bible says so simply leads to a circular argument: How do you know the Bible is true " because it is the inspired word of God " How do you know that God is real " because the Bible says He is. This is not evidence. Hesiod"s Theogony was written in the 7th century BC and describes the ancient Greek religion"s Gods and creation myth. Do you think that the Greeks of that time didn"t also believe that it was "inspired truth" and an accurate description of reality? There are dozens " maybe hundreds " of self-described Holy books in the world. They can"t all be true, so how does one decide which to believe? Simply put, most people decide based on their heritage " parents teach their children what they believe and it becomes what the children will believe. Charles Darwin"s theory of evolution has not been conclusively proven or disproven, but people who disagree will continue to find flaws in it. The most basic of these "flaws" is the initial source of life. We do not know. However, it is equally disingenuous to say that God created life, because we are left with the question of where God came from. If "He was always there" then why can"t we assume that life was always here? Either answer requires a leap of faith. The fact is that we do not know how life began, but evolution and scientific inquiry will lead to more complete, accurate and provable answers than "God did it." Evil spirits and exorcisms are "shows" to deal with (usually) psychological disorders that the ancients did not understand and many today refuse to understand. A person with multiple personality disorder exhibits what appears to be a different "personality" than usual, so there must be a demon in there to account for the "extra" personality. It"s a chemical imbalance treatable with medication and appropriate therapy, not an unseen spirit. Death is the final unknown for which Gods, religion and the supernatural were created. People fear the unknown, and death is perhaps the greatest and most personal of those unknowns. Again, there are many religions each with different stories about "the afterlife" " none is more or less valid than any of the others. They give comfort to those who remain, and hope for when they will die. That does not make them accurate and without solid evidence we simply do not know what (if anything) happens to the "person" after death. Finally, you close with the argument that "God gives people faith so the[y] believe [in] God "" This is just as circular an argument as God exists because the Bible says He does. Where is the independently verifiable, testable evidence? Faith is useful for 'filling the gaps' of our knowledge, but it shouldn't be a substitute for actual research and discovery.
The concept of gods, religion & supernatural arose to explain what was not yet understood.

Introductionthanks for the pro that make this debateand because my religion is Christian so i just purpose base on Christianactually, this is also my first debate so please be fun.. :DArgument : People are not created Gods, religion, and the supernaturalbecause we know that first God are not created because base on holy bible God can't be created,there are so many facts that religion is true example the ark of Nuh is found, and of course with this many people will believe to religion. so if people create God, so who create people? ok many people say that from evolution but many scientist just pretend theirself like Dr. Charles Dawson, but scientist already found that what Dr. Charles Dawson found is not true. and the concept that make people not yet understood is not true, because the faith from christian make them understand, but we know that they can't tell it directly but they understand, example like they become possessed and the theology people or the others can extrude the evil spirit from that people and if they don't understand, how can they extrude the evil spirit? and of course it's supernatural. and religion people understand why they choose their religion and many atheist become religion people because they alraedy have direct contact with God and it's miracle . so with this God give people faith so the believe to God. and also they know if people die they know where they go, it just between hell and heaven but for atheist if they die they don't know where will they go, because they don't believe it. it just they stop after they die. and it means that many people understand because of their faith even they can't tell it directly
The concept of gods, religion & supernatural arose to explain what was not yet understood.

People created gods, religion and the supernatural as attempts to explain things in the world that they did not understand. As Human understanding grew, those concepts changed more slowly than the increased understanding. Most religions have been hopelessly outstripped by human scientific knowledge, but their adherents are reluctant to let go of the comfort and perceived certainty that these beliefs give them. However, everything is part of the natural world, there are no gods and anything considered 'supernatural' simply is not yet fully understood. This is my first debate in this forum, so please excuse me if I have not phrased the question as clearly or succinctly as it could have been. I propose a relatively free-form format, with initial positions in round 1, rebuttals in round 2 and conclusions in round 3.
The concept of gods, religion & supernatural arose to explain what was not yet understood.

"As to the question "who created us" that is an equally meaningless question. To paraphrase what I stated in the previous round, if we needed God to be created, then why didn"t God need someone/something to create him? "God is Alpha and Omega and it means that God is the first and the last. so you understand that the first and the last.and Miracles, miracles is true, and if you watch the video you'll know that.and about faith, yes it's true that faith is belief and trust in and loyalty to God, but i mean that if we have faith to God we'll understand trough the holy spirit, like base on christian when the Pentecost happen they confuse because they hear the prophet talk with their language, and it means that they understand because the holy spirit. and if people have faith to God of course the holy spirit will come to them and will make understand.and you said about limbo, actually limbo isn't truebecause limbo is just some speculative idea because when that age, they confuse if people stuck in their original sinhttp://en.wikipedia.org...and it's still not proven. and about the rencanation, yes the hindu or buddha people are believe in that, but they still believe hell and heaven. because their teory of the rencarnation when they kill animal, like example if they rack cat when the cat is pregnant so when they die, they will reborn and they automaticly will punish by nature, example their life will suffer,etc. and afterthat they will die , but won't rencarnation again, and of course they will go to hell or heaven. and about God, religion , and supernatural isn't KNOWLEDGE, so it means that even expert won't know it. like i said before it just when people have faith to God and holy spirit make them understand.
WhiteFlame Worse Mod on Any Website

Because of whiteFlame the website is in the gutter. No one votes on debates ever, and it's a struggle to get any votes. This is fact, and you can go to check the in voting, you'd be lucky to get one or two people to vote on your debates, but guess what happens? White Coward comes and removes them because the person leaving a review is not a english major. White coward is biased. Net Neutrality is going to be gone, or is, and Debate.Org is going to shut down within two years because of it. Who's going to support it? Not many because of white coward and his power tripping acts of removing votes, and just being a bad person who probably gets bullied at work and comes here to take it out on general population. This coward removed a vote of mine months ago, and like a few months later returns to the same debate to remove a older vote (guess he missed that one the first time). He's a real piece of Sh!t and does deserve cancer. I think anyone who power trips, and is a coward like him should get stage 4 because chances are, he's not a nice person. I'm betting he paid my opponent to stand up for him.
WhiteFlame Worse Mod on Any Website

Whiteflame is indeed a fair moderator. I have conversed with him on many various occasions and he has been very cordial to me. He has removed two votes from my debates, and both for good reason. One person simply started stating his own opinions and voted for my opponent in every section. He did not provide any reasoning or information as to why he voted in that form. Had Whiteflame not removed his vote, I would have lost the debate. The other time someone voted for me and did the same exact thing: provide no information or reasoning. Whiteflame also removed this vote. Both removals are clearly justified. WinBoat is clearly going off the deep end. He is suggesting that Whiteflame should deserve to die simply because WinBoat thinks Whiteflame is a "Power tripper". Even if this was the case, those wishes are not justified at all any way you look at it. Whiteflame is an extremely productive moderator for this website and is simply trying to perform the duties assigned to him. He is far from being a "Power tripper."
WhiteFlame Worse Mod on Any Website

White Flame is a moron and is the worse mod on any website. He's an overweight, obese effer that sits in his chair all day with biased thoughts and opinion, and removes every vote from debates that he possibly can. He doesn't have any friends besides his online friends, and it's amazing how he is even a mod still for this website. Power trippers like him should get stage 4 cancer. Too bad god would much rather kill children instead of handling trash like this who don't deserve to live. Pro must argue for whiteflame, and demostrate that he is indeed fair, and not a power tripper. They will probably lose because there is no argument for it. Because of Whiteflame, this website is terrible, because of whiteflame, no one votes on any of the debates because he just removes anyones votes and dismisses it as "not good enough". Seriously. Get cancer dude. It's a shame children are dying, and you just take up all the food in the world and shelter your overweight a$$ while sitting and modding these forums all day you power tripping moron.
Are Millennials A Problem

I would like to argue that millennials are humans like everyone else, and have the capacity to be intelligent, as everyone else. I believe that millennials as a whole are only the symptom, not the problem as you have made them out to be. The world would not be a better place without them, as they themselves are the product of the pre-millennial world, which indicates that world without millennials has the capacity to produce that which can be considered negative and in other words, a generation of degenerates. I would argue that the primary issue is the environment - should we replace the environment with a better version, millennials would not come into existence, instead, they would grow up to be as the previous generations have been. I would furthermore like to argue that various philosophies such as Globalism, Marxism, and late roots of the Renaissance.