I can disprove evolution like i could disprove a book having no front cover.

Right wow all you have done was disagree and reply inlogically, sure you wont see that because, YOU'VE been brain washed by your science teacher at school. Now your right on that I'm disproving evolution here and creation should really come into this and i shouldn't have to mention God either. Moreover if eveolution is disproven then creation would be the only sulution, thats all you are right on though. I cant say to much as all you have done is said your personal veiw on this topic. Yes you have given some links about laws of science but that is just proving science laws not evolution. Ok what i mean by a time limit, is that basiclly you can spend forever on the exsperiment otherwise you would never know if the theory is true. Yeah another correction a theory is not a guess. Lets put this to the test I'm guessing that the sun's core is -100*C (about) therefore its a theory No a theory is mad up with facts, depending how you place those facts depends on the out come. In evolutions part, for example you say fossils are millions of years old, the fact is that they are dead creatures, the thory is that they are millions of years old. The only thing what makes you believe that is because they are millions of years old is because they are deep in the ground, you date the fossils by the rock its in, and you date the rock by the the fossil it was consumed in. Thats circular reasoning Big tim, no not Big Bang. Big Time. (I was explaining what a theory was, no science was nessary). Right like my new theory (the suns core being -100 degrees yes that uses gravity, dont not mean its true. Yes evolution uses gavity too, i know this f=ma has little to do with evolution but i hope you get what im saying here? We know that the sun exists and we can tell the suns core isn't -100 digrees by feeling the heat of the sun. It would be inlogical to say the suns core is -100 digrees, yet because there is life and you dont believe in God you only, and i mean only can believe that life can arose is by evolution. Period! Yes there are theories with several laws, the law of time evolution includes that, the second law of phermeildinamics, which evolution includs phermeildinamies slighty, only for once life time but not generally as a fact that specises are getting worse and worse but instead better and better. Yeah find me a sulution to turn things better and better as they get older and i Will believe it. I know what you are thinking now, your thinking they get exspraince in the enviroment and creatures add genes as a result. Like i said before, i guess you don't understand how much information DNA contains? One tea spoon of DNA contains more information than all the books ever writen. How is this possaible by walking, swinging, climbing, flying and swinging and ever being still (coral) even over five trillion trillion year it would still be impossaible, because these actievitivies don't collect information not like study does. That gives doesn't it, tell me how did memory evolve? Next you said " A transposon are sequences of DNA that can move around within the genome of a cell. In this process, they can create/change the amount of DNA in the cell. When two transposable elements are recognized by the same site-specific recombination enzyme, it can very efficiently lead to the creation of new genes [1][2]." Tell me how genes appear, don't just gather words, you said "When two transposable elements are recognized by the same site-specific recombination enzyme, it can very efficiently lead to the creation of new genes" I would say that using a gene it had already! You are getting mixed up with DNA and RNA, RNA is a copy of DNA and yes the copying mechenism is very effected when genes already exist. RNA has around 20 mintes before energy is used up to work muscles, ever wondered way you need to drink a protein shake with in 20 miuntes after working out? Now you know. For example, lets take muscle, to have movment you need muscles, so bacteria has very small muscles. So by saying creatures add genes is like saying there must of added the gene muscle, how if they couldn't move? Answer that HUH? So when you talk about mutations are you saying that one day bacteria just got musclar genes? Thats what your saying dispite the increable amount of information. About the formula thing, if evolution didnt need one why are they looking for one, and offering a Noble prize? Secondly you said that evolution changes so a formula would be unessary, well gravity differs in strength but still has a formula, the concept of gavity is f=ma, what is the concept of evolution where is the formula for evolution? As numbers/algebra acounts for every language a formula is needed to define this with no different meanings or tranlations, formulas are a univeral language while the English language is not. You say evolution is mindless and uncreative there for you are both of those as your "part of it" (evolution) No men will never fly, but the other points maybe, we can run and swim, fly no because are bones are not hollow like a birds, i bet you going to say where are sweat holes are feathers will evolve. I'm aware evolution is not the survival of the fittest, because one of those ants might have a extra gene bla bla bla....inconcept of evolution that is indeed true. Ummm no ants are not the most sussesful animal on the planet, just because there is more, what if i added bacteria into this equeation, now you would say they are the most sussesful animal. Right? Putting a lion in a rain forest, umm ok that would help the others already there. Lions exists in rain forest so do elephents, they go to wide open spaces within rain forests, a gathering of elephents come to the water hole to drink, then they return back into the rain forest not seeing another elepent for a month or so. You ever watched Planet Earth? Its on there. That whole parograph you tpyed was pointless and incorrect. I wish i could prove it, evermore i would never put a gun to ones head. 1. Ofcouse the Universe needs a motavational sourse what got you up this morning, what makes loins hunt, i can answer that, hunger does. 2. Well there had to be a second where matter was none living and another second where none living matter was ALIVE! Theres no middle to this, your either dead or alive, no aliad the middle of death and life, if only the e and a were swapped around when i would have put, as a joke. You have been alied to. 3. Alians just move the problem else where, you didn't aswer this question dumby. And God isn't Mr magic man either, God is what He is, "I am who i am" God is God an eternal being, far beyond even the smartest imagenation. Going back to the helpless babyies, if evolution is true then in birds and mamales the offspring would be inderpent like most fish and repties, but wait birds came from replies so why is this. But wait again mamales came from fish millions of years ago, so why would mamales and birds give away sush a vital survival tool? How much more sussesful would birds and mamales be with out looking after their young. Im going to let you into flaw on my part here, maybe because birds and mamales can't carry so much young like fish can , so when they have young they look after it as well as they can. Neah i was joking there is no flaw here its the survival of the fit, so the offspring should be totaly interpendent from day one. Still dont get that then why didn't birds and mamales evolve a mechenism which could allow the to carry out more young, as they evoled a brian, that task shouldn't be to hard. Closeing comments: So what you having for tea.......