The Fallacy Challenge

Let's jump this off with a serious argument...1. My opponent will more than likely make at least one logical fallacy from round 2 to round 5It is extremely hard to NOT made a logical fallacy within a debate. There are so many logical fallacies, if you misinterpret, make a logical jump to conclusion, or appeal to authority, nature or emotion, you will be commiting a logical fallacy. In fact, Thett3 pointed out a logical fallacy in his debate even before the opponent started his arguments. [1] This just shows how darn hard it is to NOT make a logical fallacy. Even the acclaimed "Logical-Master" commits fallacies at times, as shown in source [2]. And Logical Master knows his fallacies!Now, unto my second point: Morgan Freeman has Cotton Candy... You may try to rebut my first point, but your arguments will stand invalid because Morgan Freeman has cotton candy. As far as we're concerned, invalid means "(of things) in poor or weakened condition" in this particular situation. [3] Because your argument is weak and poor, it more than likely commited a logical fallacy. Strong arguments don't commit logical fallacies, because if they did all that would be required to take them down is to show how they're wrong.3. You won't be able to resist the pull of making fallaciesYou are probably outraged by now. You probably think "9spaceking is crazy. I'm not gonna fall for that first argument's trick, and the second argument...well, that's just lame and dumb." And you may be right. But you're gonna have to hold it in. You're gonna have to hold it in, regardless. And will you hold it in for your response? Probably. For round 3? Maybe. For round 4? That would be tough, but manageable. But putting up with 5 rounds of terribleness??! Well Envisage, you'll probably get really annoyed at the end. It could last up to 24 days in total, if we each wait 3 days to post our arguments. Even if you post your arguments immediately, I could still stall and make this 12 days. 12 days of you waiting for my argument, sitting in front of the computer, relieved that it's your turn, only to see my "insults", false accusations, and troll arguments. You won't survive long. You'll grow angry and impatient. You'll soon be writing detailed papers in disguise of your own feelings, only to get cracked by me. You'll probably try to use troll arguments as well, only to realize you can't. You may also fall into one of my traps. There's a load of possibilities just waiting out there, and the more I pull and tug, the harder it is to keep your cool. Right now it's only round 2 but trust me, it'll get very very hard. Just wait and see.4. Everyone will vote for meEvidence has shown that there are many bad voters on this site. Why? Well, you probably remember that debate between me and Wylted. Yeah, that silly debate concerning the 1-gap. Anyhow, even Wylted himself admits "I only ask good voters for votes, because I'm aware if the inherent bias that comes along with the request when asking weaker voters." [4] This shows that even Wylted wasn't taking the chances that he might accidentally ask a bad voter. And he had the right mind to it. Every good and unbiased voter--Blade of Truth, YYW, Bladerunner, Whiteflame, Ragnar, you name it, they all voted my opponent. (The rightful winner) However, even though I myself believe that I should have lost the debate, I still gained up to a massive 54 points due to the biased voters who voted for me. My opponent of course does not have to be careful if he is the clear winner, however, when things get really darn close and only the debaters can tell who won and who lost, then the bad voters who support the troll ultimately come out. Had it not been for Bladey's last-minute save, Wylted would have unfortunately lost a debate to an only slightly-better-than-average debater. Thus, my opponent needs to hire some really good voters to vote on this. But who will they vote? Will they actually believe that you are the one who made fallacies, and that I won the debate? I lay down many traps and attacks, it will be a tough battle...you've got to be careful, whether it's the good voters (who will examine the debate carefully to see if you made an impossible-to-recover logical fallacies), or the bad voters (who will vote for me just because they scanned the debate and didn't seem to see you recover from your fallacies). This strengthens my point about the difficulty level of this debate, and thus, you are in the danger zone... you will have to get out of it somehow and prove that you won't make a logical fallacy...while still refuting my points. Good luck on your round, and don't make any logical fallacies! ;)[1] http://www.debate.org...[2] http://www.debate.org...[3] http://dictionary.reference.com... [4] http://www.debate.org...