God can exist even though there is suffering

I respect his opinions also. I shall extend my arguments a little further, that if their is a God and people worshiped him, it is believed that divine intervention could in theory happen. Lets take a person suffering in a rather Christian dominated country. I shall take you to Austria, where in 2010, 60% of the population claimed to be Catholic, while the second most being Lutheran was 3.8% of the total population. [1] In 2005, 50% claimed they believe in a God, while 34% simply believed in a higher power. [2] I shall take you to the year 2008 in Austria, where a particular case made international headlines around the world. Her name was Elizabeth Fritzl, a beautiful young woman whom -it was believed- abandoned her family to journey with a local cult for over 20 years. It turns out her father trapped her in the family basement for that entire time, literally forging everything she supposedly wrote. She would be sexually assaulted and abused by her father, for over 20 years. The relationship would be so bad it produced 7 offspring and 1 miscarriage[3]. Yes, a father raping his daughter of all the most nasty and disgusting things he could have possibly done. Now let's assume with the statistics above that Elizabeth was most likely Cathloic, it is undisputed that this woman was the epitome of suffering. The abuse, the rape forced upon her, and the pain of no medical professionals and the forcing of giving birth in the most unsanitary conditions. I wonder how much she prayed. I wonder how much she begged for mercy from God, or thought that help would arrive. Yet NOTHING HAPPENED from the skies, not a thing! The only time she would finally be liberated was from her abuser when she was able to go to a hospital with one of her children. Heaven then -in theory because no divine intervention in this suffering world happened- watches with complete indifference. And for what? Saying she could handle it because she was strong and will be rewarded in a next life? This is absurd and cannot be believed! So no I claim to my side, in a suffering world there is one HUGE case that God dropped the ball on. But okay everyone makes mistakes right? What about another case? Enter Rwanda! Another excellent example! The most catholic country in Africa, in which -as most of you may already know- had the hutu's and tutsi killing one another. Interestingly enough, did God intervene? NOPE! Neither did the UN which has been met with criticism to a number of levels. It ended when the RPF seized control of the country, and the permission of the International Criminal Court to allow Rwanda to set up Gacaca courts to relieve the prison systems. [4] Where was God? No where, humans ended the suffering, despite all the worship they put in, Priests furthered the genocide over radio's everywhere. This does not even include: emancipation of the Jews (human), emancipation of Women (human) emancipation of slaves and other races (human), conflict resolution (human), etc. .. due to character limits! Why am I telling you this? Because we very much are in a suffering world. One in which needed to be pointed out that there is two ways in this particular debate how to disprove God. IF a God does exist, then he must be one sinister bastard to allow such lives to be nothing but wasted, with complete indifference. He expects too much from 15 year old boys, from defenseless women (for over 20 years), and shows no remorse for the deaths of those in a genocide. Why would God being so good allow you to suffer? There is only one logical conclusion: there is none. My opponent fails to understand his flaw in thinking: Why create us than abandon us? Why allow us to murder and rape? Even better! Wouldn't the world be a much better place if God DID exist, come down once or twice more, and fix some of our misconceptions within religion? Within morality? He doesn't because he is simply not there. Now why vote for me? Because I have shown 2 things: 1) Yes it is impossible to know that God exists, but the question is in a insufferable world specific to that of a Christian God whom has been supposedly known to interfere with human affairs. He does not interfere because either he does not exist or does not care about you. And 2) that if the Bible is right, he DOES care, but to gain that care no limits may be hit. Including coming to talk to you via burning bush. Thus it is most certainly true he must not exist, and his institutions alone have caused more suffering than anything else! What fire do you know of that burns for eternity? Not even the sun can do that! My opponent does not even bring up the cosmological argument. He does not even attempt to defend himself in any way shape or form. He is not even able to successfully prove that a God is even likely to exist. He claims to have such a degree which is fine, but no cosmological or ontological argument appears. Unfortunately I have been trolled, and I think I have earned this win for putting up with his shananigans! Thank you comrades! Sources: [1]. http://en.wikipedia.org... [2] Ibid [3] . http://en.wikipedia.org... [4] . http://en.wikipedia.org...