I challenge L-M, choose your poison.

RE: "As to his first point. I have read the series so it does not matter if i had something better to do with my time. On the contrary; it matters a great deal as my opponent expressly insinuated that he would not have the opportunity to read the manga and that because upheld the logic of doing better things with his time, he would not for further reason. One cannot say one thing, then say another thing and still be considered reliable. The fact of the matter is that my opponent has given separate stories that both served to be convenient to two separate arguments (one used in his second round and the other used in his 4th round, when he had dropped a majority of the arguments in this debate. We have no reason to believe that his second story is any more reliable than his first. Therefore, his personal testimony is to be dismissed without any hesitation. RE: "Also if you think i am lying, I am open to c-x about any of the events in Liar Game (From round 1, through minority rules, the revival round, and then the contraband game)" I would agree to this. In fact, I am dying for the opportunity. However, looking at this from a logical perspective, relying on cross examination not only after there is reason to doubt my opponent's credibility on self-testimony, but for the purpose of seeing whether or not he can provide certain information on an Internet discussion would be absolutely injudicious on my part as well as yours (merely for considering it). We must keep in mind that online debates pretty much nullify the necessity for prior research. This is simply because anyone can get a hold of mostly any kind of information via search engine (i.e. google) almost instantly. Heck, I could make someone in an online discussion believe I was a doctor simply because of medical information which I gathered during the discussion through google. Assuming my opponent did not read the Liar Game manga, he could easily look up information on any question I asked with merely the push of a few buttons. Heck, he could even take his time on answering questions if he wanted to. Thus, I propose an alternative. I shall provide my opponent with 12 hours to travel to my location (one could easily go from montgomery alabama to knoxville TN within this time period). We shall meet at Neyland Stadium and I shall have with me a large red poster with the words CROSS EXAMINATION written on them (I will also be wearing a Darth Vader costume). At this point, I shall allow a third party to record a personal cross examination session between my opponent and I and shall upload the results of our cross examination on youtube and post the link to the vid in the comment section. This will insure that my opponent isn't able to simply look up information thanks to fact that we are online, shall insure that it is my opponent answering the questions and shall allow my opponent to reasonably redeem his actions which removed the credibility from his self-testimony. If my opponent does not arrive at Neyland Stadium within 7 hours, he shall forfeit the deal. RE: "Now to number two. He makes separate points and I will address each one of them." I shall respond numerically below: 1) My opponent claims that books and movies get boring the more you watch them and that he wishes to preserve how he first envisioned the Liar Game manga. A) First, misunderstands the reason to this point. I'm not saying that PRo just turn around and decide to read the manga again directly after he is finished. I'm merely saying that he reread it at some point in the future. Indeed, if I were to watch the Dark Knight 3 consecutive times in one day, that would get rather annoying. However, if I were to watch it once and then watch again several months or years later, there wouldn't be annoyance and I would more effectively be able to stimulate my mind with this form of entertainment. In fact, teh same is applicable for all kinds of mediums of entertainment. There is reason DVDs of highly popular films (particularly, ones which nearly every other individual has seen . . . like Star Wars, Spider-Man, Lord of the Rings, The Dark Knight, The Godfather, etc) and it is because there is plenty of sensation to be attained in taking part in the same type of entertainment once more. B) As for mangas/books like this only being good for their surprise factor, PRO has provided no objections (hence, concedes) to the other strengths which I have claimed this series has during R1, so even if the aspect of there being a shock factor would no longer remain, there is still this series strengths in terms of complexity, philosophy and psychology . 2) Cross apply self testimony. 3) PRO states that because my point ins contingent on him gaining more knowledge (which I don't even need to address given that knowledge increases constantly as one lives), living till his older age and that there is still this manga to read, this is a rather weak objection. I say this on the basis that my claims are supported by statistics. Evidence of there being likelihood of the instigator living to old age:Life expectancy: http://www.cdc.gov... As far as still having the manga to read, there is no reason to believe that the website in question, other websites or physical copies of the Liar Game will be unvailable/ As for still dulling his enjoyment, let us first refer back to the fact that my opponent has stated that this series is only good for its surprises. I've offered my opponent a mean to learn of even surprises as well as come to find out about that which he has no awareness of. 4) Evidence of there being likelihood of the instigator contributing to having a child: http://books.google.com... Also, refer back to PRO's lack of credibility on self testimony (actually, apply this to any point where he has provided self testimony). You only have to buy one of these 4 alternatives