Any topic

Could I be Con if you don't mind? If you do mind, we can redo the debate.Lord of the is a Great book1. ThemesThe themes of Lord of the Flies are annoying. One theme is the idea that all humans have innate savage impulses. This is something I disagree with wholeheartedly because this implies that humans are innately anything. In my view, humans are born as blank canvases that are shaped by external circumstances. Some things are nature rather than nurture but savagery is not one of them. We as humans have defined savagery according to our modern principles. Nowadays, throwing a spear at someone might be considered "savage". But in ancient times, this was simply a way of carrying out business. "Savagery" is objective, thus is it what we call "nurture" not "nature".Another theme is the idea of civilization. The boys were "civilized" until they landed ont he island and their "innate savagery" took over. The words "civilization" and "civilized" bother me very much because they are so pointed towards Western "civilization". How, you might ask? Well, with imperialsm and the rise of the pseudo-science, Social Darwinism, Western powers began to see themselves as more "civilized' than the Africans and Asians. Especially the Africans. They saw these people as savages who needed Europe to come and "save" them from themselves. And now, people say things like "civilized world" to describe countries like America and whatnot, as if being Western means you are civilized. Yes, the boys had a war but how does that make them savages? We have wars now, we kill people, civilians and soldiers alike. We bomb cities, knowing there are children in them but not caring. Yes, the boys ate raw meat but how does that make them uncivilized either? In some countries, such as Ethiopia (which is in Africa by the way--seeing the pattern here?), some ethnic groups eat raw meat because they developed immunity against the viruses of raw meat. It doens't mean they're savages as much as people would like you to believe.Yes, the boys danced around a fire, singing about some god or other (I don't remember exactly what they singing about). But again, Christians sing in a Church about a God who sent animals 2by2 onto a boat that was constructed by a 400-year-old and then sent his pure son who was God but also was not God to die for our sins. 2. MeaningThe book was basically a metaphor for society. I think the author tried too hard to drive that point home. Simon was the Christ-figure--he died. Piggy was knowledge--he died. Percival was innocence--he forgot his name. Jack was evil--he didn't die unfortunately. Basically, the book was too easy.Okay, now moving on to a more humorous debate: TPPDJT has the greatest profile picture of all time.No he doesn't! Why? Three reasons:ManOkay, who is the man? Who is he? Some 17th century aristocrat? Actually, he probably is which proves that my opponent supports white supremacy and patriarchy! You can't vote for my opponent if he's racist!IlluminatiObviously my opponent has ties to a secret Bavarian society which I find to be very suspicius. What does he know? What is he hiding? If he does actually know information we don't, why does he hide it? Why is he so selfish?SupremeOkay, the Supreme sign is just weird. It doesn't even fit the time period of the rest of the profile picture! That's inconsistency which according to Freud is an indicator of an inconsistent lifestyle. My opponent probably never finishes anything he does! He probably won't even finish this debate!ON TO MEClearly, my profile picture is the superior one. It's a pretty anime girl. Who doesn't like pretty anime girls?