Christians Deceived US On Harm Caused By CSA With Intent To Suppress Premarital Sex

"When the facts conflict with the belief, change the belief ... not the facts." ~ Pywakit My opponent's casual dismissal of the laws I posted suggests these marital exemptions really have no intended purpose, and were thrown on the laws for no apparent reason. That could not be farther from the reality. Below is a very abbreviated taste of what those laws go through. Please go to the link provided and get the more comprehensive story. Once a member introduces a bill, the legislative process begins. The process has a number of specific steps. If the bill makes ...Profiling: Members can prefile bills for introduction in ... Introduction, or First Reading:The first thing that happens to bills on the "floor" is introduction ... Committee Action: The chair of each committee works with leadership and ... Rules Committee: Once a bill has been reported by the appropriate ... Rules Review /Rules White: The first step in the Rules Committee process is called Rules Review in the House and ... Rules Consideration /Rules Green: The next step is called Rules Consideration in the House and Rules Green ... Calendars/Bill Report Books: The Rules Committee decides which bills will be scheduled ... Second Reading:It is on second reading that the chamber discusses the merits of the legislation ... Third Reading: Third reading is where the roll call vote on final passage is taken. If the bill finally passes ... Concurrence, Dispute, and Conference Committees: If the bill has been amended by the second house, the first house has to ... Enrolling: Once a bill has finally passed the Legislature, it is enrolled. A certificate proclaiming ... Governor's actions: The Governor reviews the bill. The Governor may ... [1]The Christians have thought about these laws very carefully. We go back to 1960 ... In 1959, Francis had sex with a willing 14 year old girl and got caught ,,, and convicted. He appealed on the basis that while he did have sex with her, the law stated he had to have had carnal knowledge and committed carnal abuse. Since she wasn't injured, there was no abuse. 1960 debate among Supreme Court Justices on interpretation of Washington statures. Further complicating this issue, the state legislators had removed 'and abuse' in the past, then put it back in. 57 we.2d 122, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. FRANCIS F. CUNDAY, Appellant [No. 35072. Department One. Supreme Court October 20, 1960.]THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. FRANCIS F. CUNDAY, Appellant.« "The `abusing' is no part of the common (or statute) law definition of rape. We first find it in the Statute of 18 Elizabeth, Chap. 7 (Queen Elizabeth I 1558-1603), when the abominable wickedness of carnally knowing and abusing any woman child under the age of ten years' was made a felony without benefit of clergy (not married); in which case the consent or nonconsent is immaterial, as by reason of her tender years she is incapable of judgment and discretion. [2] 9.79.010 RAPE Rape is an act of sexual intercourse with a person not the wife or husband of the perpetrator committed against the person's will and without the person's consent. Every perpetrator of such an act of sexual intercourse with a person of the age of ten years or upwards not his wife or husband: 9.79.020 CARNAL KNOWLEDGE--PENALTIES. Every male person who shall carnally know and abuse any female child under the age of eighteen years, not his wife, and every female person who shall carnally know and abuse any male child under the age of eighteen years, not her husband, shall be punished as follows: (1) When such an act is committed upon a child under the age of ten years, by imprisonment in the state penitentiary for life; 9.79.070 SEDUCTIONEvery person who shall seduce and have sexual intercourse with any person of previously chaste character, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state penitentiary for not more than five years or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by both fine and imprisonment: PROVIDED, That if at any time before judgment upon an information or indictment, a defendant shall marry such person, the court shall order all further proceedings stayed. [1973 1st ex.s. c 154 § 128; 1909 c 249 § 189; 1905 c 33 § 1; code 1881 § 816; RRS § 2441.] ~gygra£i1ity==J211 121 g [3] Did you catch that? If a man seduces a young girl (rape) all is forgiven if he marries her before the judge sentences him to prison. Just like 2,000 years ago!An ex FBI agent wrote a very interesting book. Although he insists that all children are victims, he also happens to be a rare one who doesn't sugar coat (or perhaps 'terror-coat',would be more accurate) [4] Compare his book to the information at RAINN. [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] So what do adult males really think? This information is referenced on the site so feel free to track it down. In a survey of male college students: 35% anonymously admitted that, under certain circumstances, they would commit rape if they believed they could get away with it. Really? Over a third of the college students surveyed are sick, perverted monsters? Well, I have bad news. It's a lot more than that. Because there were some devout Christians among those surveyed, and they wouldn't admit it even on an anonymous survey. It's hard for some people to grasp, but biological directives are just what the name says: directives. Anyway, these are some of the studies that Christians do a great job of burying. And there's more ... A survey of 11-to-14 year-olds found:51% of the boys and 41% of the girls said forced sex was acceptable if the boy, "spent a lot of money" on the girl; 31% of the boys and 32% of the girls said it was acceptable for a man to rape a woman with past sexual experience; 87% of boys and 79% of girls said sexual assault was acceptable if the man and the woman were married; 65% of the boys and 47% of the girls said it was acceptable for a boy to rape a girl if they had been dating for more than six months. [10] Wow! Nearly half the girls admitted they are okay getting raped. Well, once again, there are a lot of Christian girls who are too frightened to admit it anonymously. Go back and take a look at the RAINN material. The Christians at RAINN want desperately to terrify all the girls. They don't care about the victims. They want them to stay victims ... excuse me ... survivors. Because Christians made them feel that way. For thousands of years young girls have been having sex. Thousands. And Christians decided their god didn't like that. 1. http://leg.wa.gov...2. http://courts.mrsc.org... 3. http://leg.wa.gov... 4. http://www.missingkids.com... 5. https://rainn.org... 6. https://rainn.org... 7. https://rainn.org... 8. https://rainn.org... 9. https://rainn.org... 10. http://www.uic.edu... 11. http://www.pandys.org... More in comments.