Old Testament Prophecy does not predict Jesus Christ

In response to the argument presented by Con, I fear that I may have inadequately stated the intention of this debate. I was hoping that Con would cite specific verses that accurately predicted each of the prophecies listed. From this position, Con could argue that the Old Testament predicts the events of the New Testament and that the two Covenants are indeed consistent with one another. My motive and goal was to analyze these specific verses provided by Con to see if first they meet the actual criteria for being a prophecy, and second, if they accurately predict the events of the New Testament thus making them a fulfilled prophecy. I, representing the Pro side of the argument will show that the provided verses were descriptions of the relative regional conflicts and tribal ambitions of the espoused authors. I wished for Con to present the verses he identified as meeting the above criteria so that the audience would not feel as if I was picking and choosing verses with my stated motive in mind. In other words, I did not want the audience to think I was "stacking the deck" or presenting literature that was discriminating in my favor. Independent of my personal belief or non-belief, I will assume that the Old Testament is historically accurate, and that the characters, events and authors are all real. Both natural and supernatural events are assumed factual accounts. This assumption does not imply that the Con argument is correct by default. To be clear, an acceptance of the OT does not equate to an acceptance of birth, death and resurrection as fulfilled prophecy in itself. Con must provide a bridge between the two covenants by citing and explaining verse that can be indentified without subjective metaphorical meanings. Most importantly the described passages must remain valid after critical analysis. I repeat, (for possibly the third time), my analysis will be in regards to relative regional conflict at the time of authorship, and the implied ambitions of the espoused authors. To my dismay, Con has only listed prophecies but no accompanying verses. I will take partial responsibility for this as I may not have been clear in my opening statement. I hope to have resolved this miscommunication in this round. With respect and apology, I request that Con provide the specific verses that correspond with each described prophecy he has listed. I am not interested in talking about prophecies yet to be fulfilled and described in the NT, as that is beyond the scope of my argument here (doesn't mean I will not accept challenge to another debate where such is discussed). In closing, please feel free to post questions and comments to my profile or to comments section. I thank you in advance for your response and patience, as I am a Noob. (New guy, inexperienced, novice) For the sake of clarity I will discuss my criteria for a fulfilled prophecy. This is the criteria that Con has to meet to add validity to his argument. Fulfilled Prophecy: 1. The prophecy must be properly interpreted. 2. The prophecy must be made before the event it fulfills. 3. The prophecy must be far enough in advance of the event to make educated guesswork impossible. 4. The event which fulfills the prophecy must have actually happened. 5. The prophecy must not be fulfilled as a direct consequence of the prophecy itself existing. . http://wiki.ironchariots.org...