Trinity is not biblical

Thanks Con for this response!'Personhood of the HS':Non-Trinitarian, Dutch theologian Ellen Flesseman-van Leer explains that the Holy Spirit is “not an independent entity alongside God, but the evidence of God’s active presence in the world."Paul mentions both God the Father and Jesus Christ in the salutations of all ten of his NT letters (assuming he wrote them all), yet he does not mention the Holy Spirit. This absence suggests that Paul did not regard the Holy Spirit as a person.The HS is the 'Spirit of the Father' Matthew 10:20 "20 For it is not you who speak, but it is the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you."We know that the Spirit of the Father speaks 'in you' another verse confirms that the SOF(spirit of the father) is same as the HS, Mark 13:11 "11 When they arrest you and hand you over, do not worry beforehand about what you are to say, but say whatever is given you in that hour; for it is not you who speak, but it is the Holy Spirit."It would be illogical for 2 spirits speak in the same person at the same time.Luke 1:35 "35 The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God."The attributes of the HS is personification of the SOF, as you said that this is a weak response but I will reinforce it further:Holy Spirit, The Anchor Bible Dictionary describes it as the "manifestation of divine presence and power perceptible especially in prophetic inspiration" (Vol. 3, 1992, p. 260).God imparted divine inspiration to His prophets and servants through the Holy Spirit, In 2 Peter 1:21 "21 for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God."The HS spoke from 'God' again remember the SOF."mind of Christ" (1 Corinthians 2:16)—also referred to as the "mind of the Spirit" (Romans 8:27).As the Messiah, He was prophesied to have "The Spirit of the Lord will rest on Him, The spirit of wisdom and understanding, The spirit of counsel and strength, The spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord." (Isaiah 11:2)we can see from this prophecy we can understand what I have said above about the 'Mind of the HS'.Impersonal of the HS:Many verses refer to the HS as not a person but a gift of God,etc:Acts:10:45 "45 All the circumcised believers who came with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also."It is highly unlikely to gift a 'person' to the gentiles(Also refer to 1 Timothy 4:14).1 Thessalonians 5:19 "19 Do not quench the Spirit;"I do not think the HS If it is a person can be quenched.Hebrews 6:4 "4 For in the case of those who have once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit,"You join into the HS? that seems illogical, no, It is not a person! ok that is logical!Matthew 3:11 11 “As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire."I can baptize someone with the HS? baptizing a person with a person?! no the HS is not a person.In contrast to the Father and Jesus Christ, who are consistently compared to human beings in Their form and shape, the Holy Spirit is consistently represented, by various manifestations, in a completely different form such as wind (Acts:2:2), fire (Acts 2:3), water (John 4:14; 7:37-39), oil (Psalm 45:7; compare Acts:10:38; Matthew25:1-10 ), a dove (Matthew 3:16).The Deity of Jesus Christ:Con asserts that God cannot be tempted but the Son and the Father can, Con actually contradicts himself:"To be tempted can mean to be successfully persuaded to do wrong or it can mean to have an attempt made to persuade to do wrong. Neither the Father nor the Son can be tempted in the sense of being persuaded to do wrong. "Then writes:" But both the Father and the Son can be tempted in the sense of having someone attempt to entice them to do wrong"I do not see your point, your rebuttal on this subject is frail, again I restate, Devil is evil, Jesus was tempted by the devil, God cannot be tempted by evil, but Jesus was tempted(Look for the verses in the previous round).Then Con goes on and points out that since Jesus is a different person still does not mean he is God, but God is 3 persons.Let us see the verse:John 17:3 "3 This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent."THE ONLY TRUE GOD, AND Jesus whom you have sent, the only true God has sent Jesus Christ, it is excluding him from the true God who sent him, your rebuttal is deficient, I say Jesus is not God according to the Bible, but you say Jesus is God because I believe in the Trinity.And then you further admit that the Son has God but is God, please, I mean really, I am showing these verses that say Jesus had a God, and is not the only true God, you are only repeating the trinity.Death of Jesus:" This argument is fallacious because what it means for a person to die is for their body to die"Death does not mean their body dies it means: "the end of life : the time when someone or something dies"[1] end of life, that means Jesus had no life for a certain time according to the Bible.Again asserts same argument " Jesus died in the sense that his physical human body died." no the verse says that Jesus suffered something called death which is explained above.How is the Father related to Jesus, father did not die, because there is no trinity in the Bible."Jesus had both a human nature and a divine nature. Jesus only died with respect to his human nature. Nothing about the divine died."Provide evidence that Jesus had 2 different natures, meaning he was a divine but not a divine at the same time, interesting.The Word(Logos):Con quotes the usual John 1, the Word, I do not have enough space but I will God willing show a decisive rebuttal: I assert that the logos in John 1:1 cannot be Jesus. Please notice that “Jesus Christ” is not a lexical definition of logos. This verse does not say, “In the beginning was Jesus.” “The Word” is not synonymous with Jesus, or even “the Messiah.” The word logos in John 1:1 refers to God’s creative self-expression His reason, purposes and plans, especially as they are brought into action. It refers to God’s self-expression, or communication, of Himself. This has come to pass through His creation (Rom. 1:19 and 20), and especially the heavens (Ps. 19). It has come through the spoken word of the prophets and through Scripture, the written Word. Most notably and finally, it has come into being through His Son (Heb. 1:1 and 2). The logos is the expression of God, and is His communication of Himself, just as a “word” is an outward expression of a person’s thoughts. This outward expression of God has now occurred through His Son, and thus it is perfectly understandable why Jesus is called the “Word.” Jesus is an outward expression of God’s reason, wisdom, purpose and plan. For the same reason, we call revelation “a word from God” and the Bible “the Word of God.” If we understand that the logos is God’s expression—His plan, purposes, reason and wisdom, it is clear that they were indeed with Him “in the beginning.” Scripture says that God’s wisdom was “from the beginning” (Prov. 8:23). It was very common in Hebrew writing to personify a concept such as wisdom. No ancient Jew reading Proverbs would think that God’s wisdom was a separate person, even though it is portrayed as one in verses like Proverbs 8:29 and 30: “…when He marked out the foundations of the earth, I [wisdom] was the craftsman at His side." Sources: [1]http://www.merriam-webster.com... And http://www.biblicalunitarian.com... Thanks for the amazing debate!! Please think not I was offending you if I did, Good luck to you in the future!