There is no misogyny. There are difference and diverse manners of treating females.

I do not agree. Because my position based on both a) objective scientific evidence confirming the differences between males and females; and b) my subjective value judgment and value judgement has been consistent and clear that while it is justifiable and recommended for males to honor-kill, beat up, stone, and this I forgot - rape - females. I neither agree with nor support the opposite case that you have postulated. Indeed it would not be surprising that there may be some female that agree with and support the scenarios that you hypothesized, and such people are the ones that may not at all agree with or support my clear, consistent position. I think they are wrong, and they may think I am wrong. There should not be any lie or pretense from any side to express "agreement" or "understanding"; what is truly the case is that neither side does not, cannot and will not agree with or understand each other. And since it is obvious that the gap between value judgments(aka opinions) cannot be narrowed or eliminated, it ultimately comes down to the point where the side that has more willingness and strength to carry out their own agenda wins. I will give you a very simple, easy-to-comprehend example: imagine that there is a male and a female in the same place. The male likes her, and wants to have sex with her; the female does not like the male and does not want to have sex with him. Who is correct? Who is right? There is no right or wrong. What happens is that the side that has more willingness and capability to perform their desire will win, such as if the male exercise more strength and willingness to have sex with her, he rapes her; if the female somehow gets out of the circumstance before he rapes her, she escapes rape. The same logic applies to cases of honor-killing, beating wives or stoning to. Might makes right, as demonstrated by a long list of records of human history. Some may counter my position by bringing up the stories of human laws and so on. However, as I argued in the first round of this debate, human laws are nothing but an oppressive tool that refuses to recognize and respect different human conscience and value judgments as well as diversity resulting from it. Human laws pretend to have some sort of justified grounds that grants them a right to force its words onto the acts and lives of people even though the people have not indicated any consent to it. But words are ultimately merely words that constantly get completely destroyed and lose their effects altogether upon encountering human acts or events. Just like the possible scenario of rape I provided above: of course human laws prohibit rape, yet rape acts/events nullify those words called human "law". Now, back to our original, pleasant discussion of whether misogyny actually exists or not. As I have shown over and over again, there are differences and there are diverse manners, acts, and events generated from those differences. So while there exists objective evidence that can be observed and confirmed that diversity exists, there is not, has not, and will not be, any objective evidence that can be observed in order to confirm the existence of "misogyny". That is the very point of the motion that I posited for this debate: There is no misogyny. There are only diverse manners of treating females. Meanwhile, you have repeatedly failed to provide objective, physical evidence to confirm the existence of misogyny. You have failed to provide proper rational as to why you believe males and females should be subject to the same treatments when there are objective evidence, the type of evidence which you claim to care about, that prove so many differences between males and females.