Tobacco/Alcohol should be banned and illegal

To further illustrate my point on the vanity of making tobacco or alcohol illegal, I'd like to point out a few studies that have been conducted.A recent study by the University at Albany illustrated the penal consequences as violent crime increased by 13%, federal prison population increased 366%, and total expenditure on the prison system increased by 1000% during Prohibition[1]. This shows how much money was wasted in vain to stop the consumption of alcohol, when by the end of Prohibition, more people were drinking than ever. By attempting to ban these things, the US economy, which is already suffering, will continue to lose more and more money, and with no results to show for it. We simply can not afford this.Additionally, making these things illegal will just allow criminal organizations to make more and more money. This can be seen by the rise of the Mafia during Prohibition and also the profits foreign drug traders currently make selling marijuana, cocaine, and heroin into the US. Richard Davenport-Hines notes, “10–15% of illicit heroin and 30% of illicit cocaine is intercepted. Drug traffickers have gross profit margins of up to 300%. At least 75% of illicit drug shipments would have to be intercepted before the traffickers’ profits were hurt.” It is nearly impossible to intercept the amount needed to stop criminal organizations from profiting, and we are wasting money doing so. On the flip side, by making drugs legal, we can profit from the sale and consumption of these things ourselves and bolster the economy.Harvard economics professor Jeffrey Miron, in an interview with the Cato Institute, observed, “Legalizing drugs would save roughly $41.3 billion per year in government expenditure on enforcement of prohibition. Of these savings, $25.7 billion would accrue to state and local governments, while $15.6 billion would accrue to the federal government…drug legalization would yield tax revenue of $46.7 billion annually, assuming legal drugs were taxed at rates comparable to those on alcohol and tobacco.” Additionally, making them legal would discourage people from doing them, since they are no longer illegal and therefore "cool". This can be seen in that Portugal now has the lowest life-time marijuana usage after legalizing marijuana[2]. So in actuality, the best way to stop people from doing drugs is to legalize them!My opponent claims that the government should care about what people do to themselves and I agree, but that does not mean they can control what they do to themselves. The government has continuously shown that it cares about the health of people by sponsoring many anti-tobacco ads, and the number of treatments for nicotine addiction has risen dramatically. As such, the amount of teens smoking cigarettes has also dropped from what it was previously. I think this is a very positive thing. However, I argue that that should be the extent of the government's invovlement. Prevent the people with the facts and tell them it's harmful, but ultimately, it is up the the people to heed these warnings or not. If they know it's harmful and decide to smoke anyway, that is their decision. Fast food can also be harmful, but that does not mean we outlaw it. If people want to eat it anyway, that is their choice and them excercising their own personal freedom.I propse to reject the notion on the grounds that the laws are unforceable, and over-step the boundaries of the government. I would also like voters to view the evidence I have provided clearly showing that legalization will not only bolster the economy, but also lower drug usage. Also note the fact that my opponent has provided little to no evidence to back her own opinion-based claims. [1]http://www.albany.edu... [2] http://www.time.com...