Armed Force War: United States vs Any Country

To my opponent: as mentioned earlier, I must start the attack; as a result of this attack, sanctions being made is completely invalid,Lol what?? The reason why I'm assuming other countries are passing sanctions against you is because you made the strategic miscalculation of disrupting oil trade and global energy supplies by attacking civilian run Saudi Arabian oil tankers while simultaneously blocking shipping lanes with your 5 gigantic aircraft carriers. You could have just let those go you know. for this is purely strategic warfare, not a realistic situation.According to military historians, strategic warfare includes "the art and science of employing national power." http://www.clausewitz.com... Why then would national power not include political and economic might as well?This war has a Congressional authorization: as mentioned, Where in Round One or in Round Two did you say you ever had Congressional authorization before launching your ill-fated attack? Please show me.the debaters have complete control over their own country.According to your own rules stated from Round 1:"The debaters will be acting commander-in-chief, chairperson of the joint chiefs of army staff, chief strategist and President of the nation."Your rules therefore, have only provided for our complete control of the military and NOT the complete control of the country. Lucky for me though, I've chosen to represent a Saudi King and an absolute ruler, while your just a President. Other nations are completely nonexistent; as stated clearly,Show me in Round One or from Round Two were you said other countries were nonexistent?? Due to your opening move of deploying US troops to Yemen in Round 2, I must infer that other countries do in fact exist. this "is an armed force war debate, in which any country of your choice FIGHTS my nation". And no other nation has thus far taken up arms or declared war against your country, where as paramilitary groups are classified officially through Geneva Conventions and International law as non state actors. The political circumstances of this war are not applicable to this debate; no militant groups may be involved.Show me again in the original rules where you have ever mentioned this? AFAIK, you have only said no military alliances with other NATIONS.this is only a military debate, not an international political one.Clearly then you don't understand how to conduct a war and have never read ClauestwitzYes, I have attacked the #2 oil producer of the world. Except that, right now, United States is the third largest oil producer in the world.A fair point, but the US is also the #2 energy consumer in the world. You'll have to do better than that then to explain the global disruption in oil energy supplies an attack on Saudi Arabia causes as well as sky rocketed gas prices causes by naval closures of the shipping lanes.There will be Islamic rebellion in the United States, but we will pacify them: this is a war against Saudi Arabia, not Islam.You have just invaded the home of Muhammad and Islam's most sacred sites and now expect to pacify Muslims?? My guys do suicide bombings right???You also must find the political means then to sell your point because in this scenario you still have not provided any legal, moral, or political justifications for why you have attacked Saudi Arabia in the first place. You have also dismissed the brewing US anti-war movement at home which is again caused by sending US troops to a middle east country after former disheartening conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.In the mean time though, wealthy and corrupt Saudi businessmen in America have taken the liberty of secretly (but still legally) buying major US defense companies inside the US after my government secretly transfers them Saudi funds to do so. This is made possible do to the fact that you have just caused a global worldwide meltdown in the stock market from disrupting oil trade and the fact that your debate rules have foolishly outlawed intelligence agencies and your only means of uncovering domestic terrorism.Please surrender now or my forces will be forced to use F-22s and F-35s that we just now bought. Any further attempts to shift the goal-posts will also result in your complete destruction.Thanks!