The Theory of Evolution is False

Now in to the final round;Rebuttal to Opponent's response in round 3First off, when my opponent talks about evolution being witnessed my opponent quotes writing about a predator and prey relationship gradually being evolved in a laboratory. This is not stating evolution of organisms is being witnessed. It is not showing how the evolution of a species has been witnessed. Now, some would say that a natural predator/prey relationship is in fact evolution, which indeed it is, but not the growing of a species in to a new form. Also, the article is about bacteria, a micro-organism. Micro Organism evolution is happening currently. Micro organisms do evolve, but not organisms with the complexity of a giraffe or a human being. Here is a website page dedicated to the response of a book approving of evolution. There is a subtitle titled; "Why We've Never Seen it," you may read that if you like, I will post it below. The evolution of a species or organism such as a human or a dog or even a pig has never been witnessed. Because it is not happening, there is no genetic proof. http://scienceagainstevolution.info...My opponent also claims that evolution in humans is still taking place, when indeed, it is at an unusual halt, which evolutionists cannot explain in logical detail. Due to text restraints, and since most of my opponents last argument was direct quotes from websites, I will leave a cite defending the idea that human evolution is at a halt, never to start up again. http://www.dailymail.co.uk...Humans are not evolving anymore. Some may argue larger features such as height, eyes, head, bone structure, ect. But all of these, "newly evolved humans" are at random. No science has ever proven that evolution is still currently taking place, if anything, science has only proven that it is no longer taking place. If you, as my opponent can tell my one evolutionary feature that humans have now that they didn't twenty years ago, I will be impressed. Final StatementMy final statement will be more extensive than in this debate than they have in my previous debates. First off, the voting. I understand that this website is predominantly atheist. I have no problem with that whatsoever. Now, most, not all by any means, atheists believe in the theory of evolution. The only thing I ask is that you do not vote bias, I am not suggesting that my audience will, I just ask for them to take it in to consideration. Next, the basic idea that evolution is a flawed theory. 1) All animals cannot be explained by evolution, and on a evolution chart, they have been filled in with imaginary animals never seen to exist 2) Evolution has never been witnessed with the except of micro evolution. 3) Lack of life on Mars proves evolution wrong.4) Chaos from organization Proves evolution wrong.5) Single cell complexity proves evolution wrong.6) Birds prove natural selection is wrongMost of these were taken from this site; http://www.abovetopsecret.com...All of the details on those six bullet points are explained in much detail on that website. I will also explain them in a one to two sentence explanation. 1) Self explanatory 2) Stated in the earlier part of this round 3) Mars, (according to evolution) has or once had the right conditions for evolution to take place. Why is there still no life? 4) Second law of thermodynamics proves organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. 5) I apologize, but this may take longer than one to two sentences to explain. So I will quote the paragraph;"Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals." 6) Also to extensive to wrap up in a brief sentence, and also too long to quote! Therefore, you will have to visit the site. I would like to thank my opponent for a good debate, thanks to everybody in the comments having interesting side debates, and thanks to my future voters for reading the debate. Sources- http://www.abovetopsecret.com... http://www.dailymail.co.uk...http://scienceagainstevolution.info...