If the Christian God and his army of angels exists then we should follow the teaching of the bible.

Hehe, I find myself wishing I had time to read all the scriptures but I do not believe I will be needing them for this debate. I would like my fellow debaters/voters to notice the part of my last round where I quite clearly state, "Keep in mind the word exists here as it is the most important word in the resolution. All I advocate is simple existence." My opponent has conceded to this argument and thereby agreed with me. All I am advocating is God's existence existence. Nowhere throughout this do I say the bible is correct. Though to give my opponent credit I do agree that the bible is correct on the fact that god exists and is correct in its depictions of his character. This however does not mean anything else in the bible is correct, for instance my opponent even states in round 1, "The all knowing, all capable god, because he, for this debate's sake, now "exists" must be able to make contradictions true. So, we will just disregard contradictions in the Bible..." In essence my opponent emulates the slippery slope fallacy in thinking that because the Christian god exists therefor the bible is all true. She even admits she admits this line of thought is a fallacy through her statement in round 1. Which brings me back to my rebuttal of her second round, she states, "I can mute my opponent's whole argument by just proving that Jesus was not Satan." My first response is quite simply, the bible does not have to be true on this issue as it has nothing to do with god existing. In fact, this point strengthens my case. If Satan wanted to convince people without a doubt that he was not Jesus he would physically put the idea in the bible that Jesus had encountered Satan and rejected Satan. However even this line of thought is rather flawed, considering Satan has super natural powers it is perfectly possible for him to split his consciousness in some way. My second response is that Jesus fasting for forty days also gives strength to my case. It is simply another way for the Devil to prove himself superhuman. My third point is also a turn on my opponents statement, "'Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'" This is simply another way for Satan to exercise excess power over his followers. Fourth the line, "Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. 9"All this I will give you," he said, "if you will bow down and worship me."" Once again only serves to give credence to Jesus as it appears that he is turning away from all that is evil. Little do people realize that Jesus is the same enemy. The easiest way to strike at your enemy is to become his friend. =) So a brief a recap is in order. I am advocating the simple existence of the Christian god. The characteristic rendered to him in the bible is all that I advocate for him. As things that he says or does have no bearing on whether he exists or not they are not guaranteed true under this debate. This in turn means that the bible is not guaranteed true under this debate, simply the part of the bible that advocate God's existence. Keep in mind that my opponent has also dropped the fact that it is empirically less likely that Jesus be of God rather than Satan. This in turn means my opponent concedes the argument to me. And finally, I once again ask that people offer constructive criticism on my concept.