nature cant come from god, but supernature can only come from nature

I assume when Pro says "supernature", they mean "that which is supernatural. " Pro's stance is that that which is supernatural originates in nature. My position will be there is nothing supernatural in the traditional sense, that which violates the physical "laws" of nature. It is, no doubt, an interesting hypothesis that anything traditionally supernatural emerges from that which is, metaphysically and objectively, "natural", i. e. derives from the productive capacity of nature. Since the terms have not been precisely defined, I shall assume they are subject to personal thoughts of definition with the limitation in regards to these definitions being properly semantically structured and not what one might consider "troll" definitions, i. e. acting as a critique of the topic via. the definition itself. Thus, the definitions I shall be using (I presume these limitations will not withold with the proposition unless they accept, thus I shall be following them and to follow these is the proposition's choice as long as those are not, definitively or relatively, absurd) are:Nature - the collective non-abstract phenomena of the material, physical world, esp. with regards to the universe. Supernatural - violating physical laws of nature; beyond the productive capacity of nature. Since Pro has presented a portion (or perhaps, the entirety) of their case in Round 1, I shall presume to do the same. == The Existence of the Supernatural ==The primary contention of the case for negation that I, as the opposition, shall present, regards the impossibility of the violation of the physical laws. When I mention "physical laws", I refer to those laws of nature that are both known to modern scientific study, and unknown, that is, yet undiscovered or perhaps that which will never be discovered prior to the extinction of the human species or its alternative evolution. (1) The Biological PerspectiveTo be supernatural in violating the laws of biology and general physiology is absurd, since the fixed notions of biology are strong in their own defense. If evolution, in its forms of microevolution ["evolutionary change within a species or small group of organisms, especially over a short period"] and macroevolution ["major evolutionary change, especially with regard to the evolution of whole taxonomic groups over long periods of time"], is true, then species cannot originate anything supernatural. "Natural selection is the gradual process by which heritable biological traits become either more or less common in a population as a function of the effect of inherited traits on the differential reproductive success of organisms interacting with their environment. " [1] Natural evolution (for selective breeding is irrelevant to this discussion), at both the microscopic level of the genome and macroscopic level of macroevolutionary and noticeable changes in large biological populations, is based on a (for lack of a better word) combination of random genetic and biological processes and natural selection [2]. Such changes in developmental traits and genetic "shifts" render it impossible for supernatural entities to originate out of natural selection in direct violation of physical laws. As seen above, the microevolution that results in eventual macroscopic changes and noticeable trait differences is perfectly illustrated in the example of these finches, whose beaks are "designed" differently to have major adaptation for their individual environmental characteristics. Thus, natural selection renders it impossible for supernatural entities to emerge from biological "units" that are composed of cell(s), and undergo processes of metabolism (life). (2) The Metaphysical PerspectiveMetaphysically, that which is "supernatural" is impossible *unless* it has objective being in a non-natural "alternative reality". General relativity allows for a formulation that IF there is something beyond the productive capacity of known natural processes, then for that entity to exist metaphysically and objectively it would have to be beyond a universe that obeys the physical laws as we know them, thus will have to be outside of natural processes. Thus, supernatural entities, IF (and only IF) they exist, cannot (metaphysically) emerge from natural entities. [3] This alternate "dimension" is hypothetical and probably non-existent, though a major breakthrough in relation with this would be a discovery of a tachyon, i. e. a particle faster than light, thus violating special relativity and, in extension, general relativity. [4]In fact, it is scientifically impossible to distinguish what is "supernatural" from what is "natural. Thus, the resolution is negated. Sources1. . http://en.wikipedia.org...;2. . http://en.wikipedia.org...;3. Hawking, S. W. (1988). A Brief History of Time. p. 30. [Chapter 2: "Space and Time"]. 4. . http://en.wikipedia.org...