Implanting GPS (ONLY) devices in newborns and toddlers.

My citing your age is NOT unprofessional, in my world to present and support accurate facts one must have had the time to study the subject and/or has lived the subject. I consider that there is relatively very little information regarding this matter, although I do acknowledge that there is some. Perhaps you had time to study the information? If this is true then you must recognize that our government system as a whole is heavily burdened by rampant and often avoidable spending? I ask you to take the Casey Anthony case in point...this woman lied, shammed, and quite deliberately led the authorities on a wild goose chase for weeks. The authorities in this case made a mockery out of a professional search when sweet little Caylee was found very close to her physical home months after the searches had all but ended. To top that the taxpayers were made to support a mockery of a trial where the Mother was eventually found not altogether guilty, and there is no doubt that in small ways the taxpayers still support her being in hiding. I believe if the grandparents of Caylee Anthony had been given an option of having this form of tracking a child available to them, that at the very least millions of dollars WOULD have been saved in locating the child promptly. Regarding hacking in to computers and why people do it? I have a variety of opinions about that one thing, in this instance I think that the following is applicable. The average age range of a hacker is 16 to 19 years of age (source: http://wiki.answers.com...), that means that some teenage CHILD, more often young men are sitting in their parents home trying to take advantage of having a good brain and the need to get into places that they do not belong. So again I cannot easily determine where a hacker may find the information of a child's location time worthy "hackable" information. Unless of course you consider the most recent murders of two young girls, all three of the alleged offenders are young TEENAGE males, it would have been sad to know that their young minds and swift brains could have infiltrated a GPS Tracking System as the one that I hark, but I do recognize the potential. However, the system of which I support would be a bit difficult to infiltrate as it would lay dormant until needed, I ask you don't hackers have issues with infiltration of a dormant system? And can't a program be intentionally distorted in that it would take hours to infiltrate? Finally wouldn't a series of unsuccessful attempts chime an alarm pretty quickly? My forte does not include hacking, primarily because I don't think in those terms. I pay other people to think in those terms for me. As I explained in a previous round of this debate, ANY phone can be hacked, quite simply, and again my forte is not hacking but I have successfully "hacked" my ex-husband's phone and did so all by myself. The location of ANY phone is substantially easier to do than hacking a phone, most especially if one carries a smart phone. Any girlfriend of one of your friends can tell you how. I did not assume anything about your personal life. I made a written observation of how I suspect your parents do and will always treat you BASED on the only physical characteristics I have of you, your profile information, and then your writing skills. That is not an assumption sir, it is an observation. I recognize that you are fairly intelligent, mostly articulate, and overall well rounded academically. I believe that at your age there is NO doubt that you did NOT alone acquire this status. Of course my observation could be distorted as I am a parent and cannot conceive that any caring parent would allow a child to grow up dimwitted, but there are cases. I also know a lot of children, having two of my own, grown children whom have had the same friends all of their lives, I've seen the end results of parental support, your writing skills in my mind put you in that class. I know alot of parents like that because let's face it, I could almost be your grandmother and not think twice about it. Pedophiles do not think, they on the average have an assortment of mental issues present throughout most of their lives which ultimately prevents them from considering all of the variables of abduction, EVEN WHEN THE VARIABLES HAVE BEEN BROADCAST A GAZILLION TIMES. When the average pedophiles life is researched it has been fairly consistent that there were MANY red flags. I cannot fathom a pedophile taking the time to sit at a computer for any extended length of time to determine a child's location. What good would it do him as more often than not anyone at or below the age of thirteen is in the company of parents, at least in close proximity. To hack a child's location for the purpose of removing that child from that location would require substantial planning POST the hacking, and while a majority have prevailed at the abductions of children, it has almost ALWAYS been a moment of opportunity. There is no doubt that the pedophile may have seen the child, may have even at some point stalked the child, learned the routines, but that doesn't require hacking, does it?