Which position has better supporting arguments? Theism vs. Atheism

1. Rebuttal"What my oponent did not understand here is I stated god exists only in his imagination. The only reason he is not locked up deep inside an asylum is because there is an ancient book written on skins of animals. "It's a shame that so many atheists feel the need to resort to ad hominem attacks instead of bringing serious logical argument to the table. I also find it quite ironic that my opponent (who has failed to bring forward, or even attempt to bring forward, an argument to defend his position, even when provided with four 10,000 character rounds to do so) suggests that I (who have provided 3 sound arguments which have thus far gone unrefuted) ought to be locked up inside an asylum. Which one of us is really the irrational one? I'll let the readers decide that. "Considering he thinks god (assuming there is one) is all powerful, I can assure you he is not stronger than my free will. "I'll have to disagree with that, as it seems to me that God is the only reason you have free will at all. Nothing about you, or me, or anyone could possibly be stronger than God, as we depend on Him for our very existence. "You have quite an imagination to believe in some all-powerful thing, yet you just choose not to believe time travel can be possible (it is only because you have never seen someone who can do it, yet you have never seen god either). "I don't recall ever stating that I believe time travel is not possible. I "time travel" every time I look at the stars in the night sky, if you'd like to count that as time travel. "Its fine you dont want to believe in my theories, then again, you cant expect me to believe in yours. "Your theories are aliens and time travel (which I haven't said I disagree with) are not the subject of this debate. The subject of this debate revolves around "Which position has better supporting arguments? Theism vs. Atheism". 2. Conclusion In the opening round of this debate, I stated that in order for my opponent to win he must refute each of the arguments I provided in defense of theism and in their place provide his own arguments in defense of atheism. As we have seen, each of my arguments have gone unrefuted and as such hold sound for now. On the other side, my opponent has been unable to bring forward a single argument to support his position that atheism is true. Thus, he has failed to carry his share of the burden of proof. When the debate began, I expected to see some kind of arguments supporting atheism. As I have not seen any such arguments, I can only conclude that my opponent has no warrant for his belief that atheism is true. You might even say he believes atheism to be true "by faith alone". Because of this, I would like to invite my opponent to consider becoming a theist. He seemingly has no disagreements with the theistic arguments I have brought forward in this debate, and so I think that given some thought, he might decide to follow the evidence where it leads. I'd like my opponent to know that he can always message me with any questions or concerns regarding theism and/or religion, as I'd be happy to help out in any way I can his journey on answering this most important of questions.