BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Islam Religion Should Be Condemned

About Giving Agency to Islam No, I did not. It is the fact that those unreasonable laws are the sharia laws, and sharia laws are Islam beliefs. "Thought experiment" That scenario cannot applied to this case, but should be applied to: Islam laws are unique Yes, Vatican City is a country with some characteristics similar to ALL ISLAMIC REPUBLIC countries It is because that is the main Christian country. However, all other sub-Christian countries are reasonable. As for Islam, that's a different case. The unreasonableness not only happen in a main country, but also happen in all sub-Islam countries. By the way, my "Christian unreasonableness" is not really anything except the freedom of religion law there. But my "Islam unreasonableness" include all of its unreasonable laws, as mentioned at the start. Indonesia Yup, but not all Sharia laws are replaced, but these laws still remain: apostasy, marriage, child religion inheritance, unwelcome of foreign religions, disallow of alcohol consumption, too regular prayers. Persecution against Christian is still like any other Islamic Republic countries. http://www.hrw.org... https://www.opendoorsusa.org... Association of fallacy ideas = Islam I strongly disagree against this. All the above unreasonable laws are not my creativity but facts, supported by evidences provided. Condemnation Islam but not other religions Again, my "unreasonableness of Christian", nothing else other than the freedom of religion in the main Christian country, Vatican City. I have no other bad thoughts about Christian, and cannot find anything else to condemn. But for Islam, I have named up a lot of laws/beliefs by Islam, and collectively, Islam should be condemned. And I disagree Islam to be a peaceful religion, it is a religion that has the largest number of terrorism groups.
Islam Religion Should Be Condemned

Your problem with Islam is that it takes the ridiculous ideas and punishments common to other religions and puts them into modern practice. You are giving agency to Islam, as if it holds responsibility, for the actions of unreasonable people. Let's have a thought experiment. I know a guy who doesn't let his daughter or wife drive, because they are women. He also tells them that if they get married, it better be to someone that shares his religious beliefs. He further explains that if either of them ever has a child, that child has to share his religious beliefs as well. What religion is this man? If you're a bigot, and you don't use logic regularly, you will conclude by the association fallacy that this man is Muslim. Per the association fallacy, just because he shares the similar unreasonable characteristics of Islam, doesn't make him Muslim. In fact, this is someone I actually know, and they are...Christian. Also you said that Vatican City, a very Christian country, does not support freedom of religion. Yet, you keep defending Christian countries. With your logic, you should be trying to condemn Christianity. I also noticed you dodged my question about a massively Muslim country, Indonesia, that does not follow the ridiculous laws of which you speak. Also the majority of countries, Egypt, U.A.E., Indonesia with sharia law have MIXED SYSTEMS, such that modern laws replace ridiculous sharia laws, and any of the reasonable sharia laws can stay. Yeah, and those countries are real Muslim. So even though you think you have provided a lot of "detailed evidence", and that it is unnecessary for you to provide more evidence, you still need to respond to the: *association fallacy of unreasonable ideas = Islam *Indonesia's lack of unreasonable rules though they are largely Muslim *Why are Islam's unreasonable law practices any different than Vatican City's unreasonable Christian practices? *...If you do conclude Islam's unreasonableness is not any different than Christianity's, then why do you feel the need to defend Christian countries? *Why should a religion like Islam, that can be followed peacefully and whose negatives are comparable to religions that shouldn't be condemned, be condemned?
Islam Religion Should Be Condemned

I hope @MagicAintReal can do this debate in a civilised manner, although subject by itself is not good. I am willing to do this seriously and accept public criticism against me. ___ Apostasy I do not know about Jewish/Christian, but what I can assure is that now, apostasy in any other religions are legal, no more laws that support outlawing. I do not find absurdity in Christian/Judaism, particularly punishments/consequences. Every religion has its own prayer type, so I cannot comment. However, punishments/consequences I will debate, which is under this debate. Those laws are unrelated to Islam religion Yup, I thought of this before. However, there is a thing which proves that the laws are by Islam, not national leaders: Sharia laws These laws, are the culprit of unreasonable punishments like amputation for theft. Christian or other religions also does not support freedom of religion like Islam Well, this is truly false. Look at those Christian countries: United States, Brazil, Mexico, etc. They do not have such laws except for the main (1): Vatican City Now look at how many countries have such laws: Iran, Saudi Arabia, United Arabic Emirates, Qatar, etc. --- Since I have some extra spaces, let me reply to some comment debates: "Discourage woman from driving car is prejudice and is untrue" Here is the evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org...'s_rights_in_Saudi_Arabia So, yes, your Saudi Arabia is prejudice, according to what you accused, @AllahoAkbar. "Islam welcome practices of foreign religions" This is ridiculous. Look at an Islam Republic country: Malaysia The authorities seized bibles, and a Perkasa chief threatened to burn bibles. At the end, he could not be prosecuted because he was defending Islam. http://www.themalaymailonline.com... About Islam Theft Amputation (reply to @AllahAkbar) Islam also has its own jail? Cool, the jail is air-conditioned and has a set of TV channels? I did not know the religion itself is so wealthy. Well, for other religions, we do not cover jails. The jails are belong to the national government, and they normally they are not air-conditioned except those VIPs. As the VIPs too expensive, most inmates stay in the normal cell, therefore, no air-condition. This gives them a chance to repent, turn over a new leaf unless the crime committed is severe. Nonetheless, now we have human rights. I cannot think of any crime that is amputation except the Sharia laws. --- Disclaimer:: All the things I said are true, and can be supported by evidences. As I have already provided a lot, I think it is unnecessary for me to continue providing detailed evidences in replies. If needed, I can co-operate too.
Islam Religion Should Be Condemned

The following is a reluctant defense of Islam, as I find most organized religions to be less than reputable with respects to their ancient texts' morals and punishments, but here you go Islam. Yes, Islam's penalty of death for apostasy is as unreasonable as the Jewish/Christian bible's penalty of death for a woman who wasn't a virgin on her wedding night. Deuteronomy 22:13-22 Actually it's exactly as unreasonable as the bible's punishment of death for apostasy Deuteronomy 13:6-13:10 and Exodus 22:20. Still doesn't mean the religions should be sentenced to a punishment, or condemned. For every absurdity in Islam, you can find just as many in Christianity and Judaism. But because we value freedom of religion, these religions shouldn't be punished for their obvious penal absurdities. If you're going to say that Islam needs to be condemned, you might as well condemn most of the modern day religions for the exact same reasons. Also I would like to point out in a country that is 87% Muslim, Indonesia, Muslim women can drive, Christians are welcome, and they even have girls' sports. So if we can have a massively Islamic country--so dominated by the very religion you claim should be condemned for its unreasonable rules--without all of the unreasonable rules you presented, we must conclude that the unreasonableness isn't particular to Islam, it's particular to people who decide to follow the unreasonable rules. I reject the claim that Islam, specifically, should be condemned or sentenced to any punishment by virtue of its unreasonable rules, because to do so would require the same treatment for most current religions, including Christianity, which would not allow for freedom of any religion. There's nothing special about Islam's unreasonableness in the realm of religions; it's just another silly belief, that I believe should be protected and not sentenced to a punishment.
Islam Religion Should Be Condemned

Personally, I am not racist. But in this debate, I cannot stop myself to and really hate the Islam rules. Here are some Islam beliefs: Apostasy in Islam is death penalty [1] So what's the death penalty? It's beheading! [2] All marriages both parties are to be Islam, otherwise the other party must convert All children bore by the Islam parents are required to be Muslims Theft punishment is amputation if convicted What the hell is this? [3] Does not welcome practice of foreign religions Not only Iran/Saudi Arabia, but all countries that are Islamic Republic persecute Christians, especially. Muslims are disallowed to consume alcohol So what if they drink? No, it will won't be a fine, but a public flogging (40-80 lashes)! [4] Prayers are very regular, 5 times a day [5] + obligation to go to Mosque every day (for men only) Discourage women from driving cars It's illegal actually. Girls are banned for sports because they may lose their virginity Oh, running loses virginity, well done! [6] [1] : https://en.wikipedia.org... [2] : https://en.wikipedia.org... [3] : https://en.wikipedia.org... [4] : http://islamqa.info... [5] : https://en.wikipedia.org... [6] : http://www.theguardian.com...
Liking is the lack of disliking, disliking is the default.

Stranger danger is a program to have kids fear people they don't know and that carries over into adulthood for a lot of people. Still, neutrality is the default stance that all people have, not dislike, cause a person can not dislike or like what they don't know. I have met a lot of people and I haven't felt hostility for someone in about five years. Inhibition comes out shyness and shyness isn't out of disliking. I'm a really shy person so I would know. I tried to beat that by walking all around town and trying to get to know people.. I failed miserably at that not cause I disliked everyone but cause I have like a mental shutdown and my mind becomes a wasteland. I no longer have my shyness anymore though for once I started going to school and a job that puts me in the forefront of talking to people and stuff... People do not dislike by default people want to like others. People want friends, boyfriends, girlfriends, children so on... It is more logical to say that like is default then dislike cause it is human nature for interconnectedness. However, neutral is the correct word for it cause no one can like or dislike something without first having some kind of interaction with it, him, or her I don't walk in and meet someone and think... Where do I punch this bitch should things go down? Not a single thought of aggression is felt. ushing thoughts say and lack of them
Liking is the lack of disliking, disliking is the default.

Most people don't start off disliking everything, they start off on a default neutral stance. It takes the initial encounter and then following encounters for people to form their opinions about someone or something. So dislike is not the default of peoples' opinions. Its is not possible for someone to dislike something they don't know exist. People don't walk into restaurants, theaters, social sites ect automatically disliking everyone there. Liking and disliking comes AFTER the experiences with someone or something not before. P.S Fuq whiteflame. :)
Liking is the lack of disliking, disliking is the default.

In reality, the 'dis-' prefix should be applied to the liking side of things.Like means like and dislike means dislike in this debate depsite the resolution, I am not flipping the words. I have invented a word 'dislikable' for the sake of conveying how this should actually be the one lacking the prefix. I know it's not real but this shouldn't be considered in my grammar vote because I've invented it for the purpose of conveying my points efficiently.There is something to dislike about absolutely anyone but there is not necessarily something to like about everyone. That in itself shuts this case airtight but for the sake of entertaining the audience, I shall expand on less airtight angles.If someone is liked by someone, they have simply shown such a severe lack of things to dislike that the person can tolerate the few things they dislike in the person because it is outweighed by the lack of other things that so many other strangers/people possess which irk the individual.So what of extreme extroverts? What of the naturally popular? They are always the same; they either intentionally mimic or unintentionally possess qualities that are seen as non-dislikable by the norm of that society. Yes, I literally used the phrase non-dislikable because likable is simply not the way to put it and shouldn't be.If I come across someone I have never met before do I like them? Not in the slightest. Do I dislike them? Initially I do and until they give me reason to loosen this disliking to them I will hold them at the safe distance that anyone would hold a stranger.So what is hate and why are enemies a minority in a person's life? Hatred is actually very rarely to do with dislike. People you really dislike, you end up avoiding but people you hate have some attributes that you fail to dislike while everything else about them is so severely atrocious that you end up loathing them for possessing enough of certain features for you to either envy or not truly ignore them.Does the mouse hate the cat? Indeed, the cat possesses a body size and level of agility that the mouse fails to despise. On the other hand, would the mouse ever trade places with the cat overall? Not until the bitter end. The mouse is content with what it is, it just happens to accept that certain attributes of the cat aren't dislikable but the mouse wishes they were.Frankly, I'm even a bit confused myself how to explain this but I'm so sure it's true, I'll see if someone can attack it.If you try and reverse this it won't work. Try reversing it and I will show you how easy the reverse alignment of things falls apart.There are people who dislike everyone but no one who likes everyone. That is pretty much another airtight point.
Poetry War!

Wargames Jump, the plane gets smaller and smaller as you plummet Scream, air sounds like a jet engine 3 feet from your head Look, look down as you see the ground under you Pray, that anti aircraft fire won't kill you grunt, as the parachute opens, you feel like you crashed your car. Shout, as your parachute glides you towards a gentle landing on the grass Look, at pillboxes laying fire on your squad. Scream, as explosions around you create a din run, towards the small ridge where others take cover Shoot, cover yourself it's the best thing you can do blink, paint splatters on your face mask, you would be dead, if this wasn't a war game
Poetry War!

Bent Mirrors Mirrors in a house, the images are you Bent mirrors in a funhouse, the images aren't true Bent mirrors can multiply you by ten Bent Mirrors make girls look like men They Can make the night look dry Or the dirt look like the sky It's a bent mirror, it creates an alternate reality they can make you lose your sanity Bent mirrors, an alternate reality? Bent Mirrors, creates feelings of duality? Bent Mirrors.
Poetry War!

Light Behind Closed Door The thin strips of light That shines under the door It comes at the end of night To show the light even more All the things that can't simply be said Or shown or expressed in any other way The thoughts that come from deep inside your head That you simply don't know how to say The thin strips of light They have a mission To convey to you Words that might Give you recognition With a new point of view At first thought things may seem To have no reason or meaning Not everything must have a theme But purpose belongs to everything
Poetry War!

The Hawk A hawk soars high above this earth All seeing, all hearing... The hawk sees humanity, giving, sharing, helping.... The hawk sees trees planted, gardens grown, people live The Hawk Sees people work, people get jobs, people get fired The Hawk Sees People fly in planes, ride on trains, drive in cars The Hawk Sees Animals in zoos, being protected from the outside The Hawk Sees People give up their time for them... The Hawk Hears Trees Splinter, bulldozers drive, as humans mercilessly level the forests The Hawk Hears people scream as wars rage, people kill other people, war crimes committed... The Hawk Observes all of this, and notices that the human race is a hypocrite.
Poetry War!

16 is fine... just don't make it too long! My poem is called: The night lives. Let the moonlight reveal the ground with it's blue beams. The stars are revealed as the dark void that is the universe is painted black. The grass moves, almost like an animated creature, as the wind rolls over. Sounds as if a bag of sand is being shaken Smell the dirt under you. Smells like life. Smell the dew coming down, down to be lifted again and again. The night air has a taste, like water, but with no mass. Taste the night air, savor it, as it is different each night. Feel the bed of grass that supports you. Like a colossal basket the field keeps you in. Cherish the night, as it will hide you for all eternity, until the sun comes to reveal all. The night lives... //Hope you like it!//
Poetry War!

I would also like to request to change the line limit to 16 as many stanza's are written with four lines which in total would reach 16. A star almost shining In the night time sky The light so blinding If it would only reach your eye This abandon country road Where life's darkness dwelt The night so cold If only it was felt Forever falling down Sinking into this bottomless bed Your ears hear no sound As your fear is slowly fed But as you break free Of this night time dream Maybe you'll see the star as it gleams
should we ban alcohol

Alchohol however doesn't do that in maintained amounts. While it can do that when being overused, anything can do that. Too much food makes you fat, too much to drink makes you drown, and too many drugs makes you overdose. The problem isn't that it's alchohol, it is that people tend to get addicted to it. However there is a reason that we have limits on alchohol, and that is because of this. I do agree that it is very easy to get around this limit, however it IS up to that person who bought the alchohol.
Ross and Rachel (Friends)

Through the first time I watched the show, I was rooting for them in the first 2 seasons. But as the show went on, It got really annoying and dull in their on-again-off-again relationship. As I watched the show a 3rd and 4th time, I realized that they didn't go together in my opinion. They actually brought out the worst in each. Both are possessive and jealous in their own way. They could barely communicate their feeling for each other. Ross always talks down to Rachel. I always remember the list Ross made of Rachel's pros and cons. He said she was "spoiled", "ditsy", And the worst of all "just a waitress". Then brings me the question, Why are they in love? Another problem I have with them is that they are too dramatic. That is one of the reasons I don't like the final 2 episodes of the whole series.
Use of E-Cigarettes/Hookah Pens in underage citizens

They involve tobacco dependence by trying to treat it with a lesser dosage, if we're consistent with the point of therapeutic value I made. We are not debating if it is legal or not, so that's off the point. Hookah pens can contain no harmful ingredients such as nicotine. E-cigarettes and hookah pens can be used therapeutically, so I'm for it in that manner, and I'm for hookah pens that do not contain ingredients such as nicotine and tar etc. in any manner.
Use of E-Cigarettes/Hookah Pens in underage citizens

I don't see how adulthood has anything to do with it. These simulations of cigarettes can be a good replacement for those who are addicted to tabacco. "The primary therapeutic use of nicotine is in treating nicotine dependence in order to eliminate smoking with the damage it does to health. Controlled levels of nicotine are given to patients through gums, dermal patches, lozenges, electronic/substitute cigarettes or nasal sprays in an effort to wean them off their dependence. Studies have found that these therapies increase the chance of success of quitting by 50 to 70%, Though reductions in the population as a whole has not been demonstrated." http://en.wikipedia.org... Hookah pens contains far less to no nicotine. http://www.ireachcontent.com... http://www.zamnesia.com...
Government Spending to Help the Economy is a Waste of Money

A little economics lesson for you kid. John Maynard Keynes, a world class economist, reasoned that government intervention could stimulate demand for labor during a recession and end it. Here's how it works, but I might not have it word for word. As the government spends, it gives money to others. They use that money too, and the receivers of that money also pass it on. The government receives taxes from this cycle and the money begins flowing again. Once money begins flowing again, the idea of flowing available money appeals to some entrepreneurs and companies, who now need laborers, who are currently unemployed. They rehire the workers and unemployment decreases. The employment raising ends the recession. Boom. Not a waste of money now, is it? The whole cycle has to start with the Government spending. Your move, Duncan.
Government Spending to Help the Economy is a Waste of Money

Spending for the economy should be done by the private sector where there is competition and personal involvement. We are spending 4.1 million dollars per job [1] to get small if any improvement. [2] Green energy companies have lost profits and some have gone out of business. [3] The labor participation rate has gone down ever 2003. [4] Energy sources are still mainly coming from petroleum, natural gas and coal. [5] In conclusion, there is no correlation between government spending, government spending and economic growth. [6][7] [1]http://www.aei-ideas.org... [2]http://data.bls.gov... [3]http://blog.heritage.org... [4] http://data.bls.gov... [5]http://www.eia.gov... [6]http://www.youtube.com... [7]http://www.youtube.com...