Atheism has Proof, Evidence, Facts, Validity and Truth that it's Accurate, True and Correct.

Argument 1: Lack of Evidence for Theism.Atheism can be a few things, the rejection of Theism or the lack of belief/conviction in a god(s). Both of these can be proven by the lack of religions fulfilling their burden of proof. If skeptics don’t find any evidence for theism, then atheism is the default position until theism can properly prove itself.If someone claimed unicorns exists and if they can’t prove it, then “aunicornism” is justified. Since religion has yet to met their BOP, atheism is justified.Argument 2: Non CognitivismThe Argument from Non Cognitivism is formed like this,1. There are three attributes of existants which concern us particularly, these being: A. Primary AttributesB. Secondary AttributesC. Relational Attributes.2. B as well as C are dependent upon and must be related to an existant’s A in order to be considered meaningful.3. The term “God” lacks a positively identified A.4. Because of this, the term “God” holds no justified A, B, or C. (From 2)5. However, an attribute-less term (a term lacking A, B, and C) is meaningless.6. Therefore, the term “God” is meaningless. (From 3, 4, 5)7. Therefore, the god-concept is invalid.A typical response is that God is “All-loving, all-powerful, all knowing, perfect, just, ect”.These are only attributes of “B” not “A”. I will quote from the strongatheism.net’s article on this argument to demonstrate why the above attributes don’t answer this argument“It is important to note that the question is particularly, “What is God?”, rather than inquiring as to the capacities, actions, or character traits of such a thing. The inquiry posed by the ANC(Argument from Non Cognitvism) demands a comprehensive presentation of the identity of whatever that is which the theist is asserting. This is necessary for two reasons:Firstly, if one were to say that, “The dress is beautiful”, and I were to respond by asking, “What is a dress?”—it would hardly be a help to me for that individual to respond, “It has a nice design and is comfortable”. While it being comfortable and being designed attractively may play a factor in its being called beautiful, my question has not been answered. I have not asked for further secondary characteristics of the dress, but rather what the dress is itself that it has the capacity to be called “beautiful”.Similarly, when the Strong-Atheist inquires, “What is God?”—the theist’s reiterating of the various capacities and secondary character traits found in scriptural texts and elsewhere is insufficient. The question inquires specifically into what “God” is, rather than what “God” can do, likes to do, or has done.”Argument 3: Argument from Perfection.1. If God exists, then he is perfect. 2. If God exists, then he is the creator of the universe. 3. A perfect being can have no needs or wants. 4. If any being created the universe, then he must have had some need or want. 5. Therefore, it is impossible for a perfect being to be the creator of the universe (from 3 and 4). 6. Hence, it is impossible for God to exist (from 1, 2, and 5). Argument 4: Argument from Reason1.God is omniscient. 2.God is omnipotent. 3.God wants everyone to believe in him. 4.Since God is omniscient, he knows exactly what demonstration would convince any given person that he exists. 5.Since God is omnipotent, he is capable of performing this demonstration. 6.Since God wants everyone to believe in him, he wants to perform this demonstration. 7.However, atheists manifestly exist. 8.Therefore, the god described by the first three conditions does not exist. Also formed1.God either does or does not reveal his existence 2.If God does not reveal his existence, there is no reason for belief 3.If God does reveal his existence, there is no reason for belief, only knowledge 4.The problem of vagueness indicates that there is an unclear ground for belief. Argument 4a: Application to Bay’s Theorem.We can apply any one of these arguments to Bay’s Theorem, which is a Theorem on calculating the probability of something. We will use number 4.For a better understanding of Bay’s, I recommend reading the Wikipedia article on it.http://en.wikipedia.org...Bay’s starts with taking the probability of hypothesis being true based solely on the background knowledge and nothing else. We will assume the background knowledge of God existing is 50/50. Now we must get the probability based on evidence. We have a lot of experience with beings that have these characteristics of wanting to give evidence, having the power to do so and actually doing it. They’re called humans. If we have 1000 humans who want to give evidence they exist and have the power to do so, there wouldn’t be any reason at all for someone not to give that evidence. Let’s be really generous and say there exists 50 good, unique, and valid reasons for not giving that evidence. This would mean our probability for God’s existence would be 50 or 0.5 and against would be 950. Our equation with answers is below. 0.5*0.5 = 0.25P= ----------------- 0.5* 950 = 475 + 0.25= 475.25 0.25/475.25 = 0.0005Meaning there’s only a 0.0005% chance God exists.Conclusion for 4a.Theism is extremely improbable.The resolution is affirmed.