If India and Pakistan went into another all-out war, Pakistan would be victorious.

Thank you, Con.REBUTTALS:Both my opponents claims are only for Pakistan and India ALONE. He is forgetting the key to winning the war: China's support. I will have to prove that China would get involved, and I plan to do so. What my opponent does not understand is that China has been involved with Pakistan's past wars. They have provided SIGNIFICANT aid to Pakistan, even during the wars. [1] They just haven't fought hand to hand, but I believe after all these wars bottling up, China would want to end it. Both my opponents arguments are useless at this point, because he has not proven that China would not want to get involved. "Pro believes that China will enter the war. This is entirely false. Pro himself stated that Chinese-Pakistani relations were strong for over sixty years. This puts the start of their close relationship around 1950. However, there have been three wars between India and Pakistan (one as recent as 1999,) and China has never gotten involved. This despite every argument Pro made. All of his arguments stood back then too, and yet China stayed out."China has NOT stayed out. In fact, they have supplied Pakistan. My article: (http://www.cfr.org...) states: "India has long been perturbed by China's military aid to Pakistan." In fact, my article also states: "China's role as a major arms supplier for Pakistan began in the 1960s and included assistance in building a number of arms factories in Pakistan and supplying complete weapons systems." So in fact, my opponent's whole claim about China's "neutrality" and "doesn't want to get involved" is highly invalid. They have supplied many arms and not to mention missiles to Pakistan, which proves my fact that they also favor Pakistan more."Assume, though, that China gets involved. China is only the third strongest power. Russia surpasses China in power (5, 10). China maintains a no-alliance policy, despite their close ties with Pakistan. However, Russia and India are entirely allied. They provide strong economic and militaristic aid, and their alliance is only getting stronger (11). China would be against the second and fourth strongest armies in the world. That being said, it's not beyond Russia to aid India in the event that India is losing, but it is unlikely that China would aid Pakistan against a force like India." I suppose my opponent has never heard of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, which involves Russia and China together as allies... they supply each other with military. [2] So Russia would not attack China at all. It's basically a pact. Here's a map of the countries included.. This also means my opponent's Russia arguments are invalid. Also, if Russia did intervene, supporting either country, it would surely lead to WWIII, because we all know the US will get involved."China would avoid entering the war with the US because relations with the US are stronger than relations with Pakistan, if only because China needs the US. The relationship with the US is far stronger because of dependency on US industry, consumerism, and aid. If Pakistan invaded India, the US would side with the Defender and be at odds with China. As shown, debt and such wouldn't stop the US. Meanwhile, China and Pakistan would be at potential war with the Strongest, Second Strongest, and Fourth Stronger military powers in the world. They would stand no chance."This may be true, but China's manpower is about 700 billion. How much is the US? About 150 billion. The USA would be overwhelmed, too many troops would be coming at them.ARGUMENTS IF THE US DOES GET INVOLVED, RUSSIA WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF CHINARussia and China are friendly, just like India and Russia are friendly. My opponent fails to acknowledge this. In fact, if the US gets involved, Russia would most likely support China! Take a look at this map: http://www.washingtonpost.com... Russia, as you can see, is red. They would favor China rather than the US. If Russia does go to war with the USA, WWIII would most likely happen, so I would say RUssia would be neutral, but in favor of China.IF THE US DID GET INVOLVED IN THE FIRST PLACE, THEIR ECONOMY WOULD CRUMBLEGet a T-Shirt. Look at where it was made from. Most likely, from China. Major corporations like Microsoft and Apple get most of their supplies from... China! Look at this map, which shows where the supplies come from: Look at China. 394 suppliers supplie Apple in China. That's more than any other country on the map. Major corporations will struggle, the economy as a result, will go down. Economic growth will decrease. I looked at the article of Soverign Default, and I don't understand it. But, I didn't see anything involved with China and the US. But, if the US declares war on China, it would be disastrous. But, from the article I read, it quotes: "So what would happen if China, Russia and other foreign buyers of our debt all of a sudden quit purchasing our debt and instead started dumping the debt that they already own back on to the market?" And, that would crumble our economy. China purchases debt for us, in case you didn't know. They can buy out our debt, if they stop, it will be a DISASTER. Even if China does not claim the debt, (which they most likely will do) they will not buy out our debt. [3]Cites:[1]- http://www.cfr.org...[2]- https://en.wikipedia.org...[3]- http://www.zerohedge.com...