Smoking Ban

I thank Tejretics for his arguments. I will put my rebuttals and extra arguments. FrameworkOkay, Con has made his rebuttals, when he is not supposed to. He is just supposed to type his arguments because this is 5 rounds and there is also no reason to rebut three rounds. Just to say, the health argument was about that it is not beneficial for your health meaning before doing more damage, we should ban smoking.Rebuttals1. Okay, my first rebuttal is the formation of cartels.Con's first statement is that cigarettes are addictive. Then that means that we should ban them to make them stopped. It is solved. Con says that 5700 people die. However, there is a lot more about 36687 people in California in 4 years. California is just one state. There will surely we over 5700 smokers every year in the US. This shows that people will die. Con states that if we legalize all drugs, there will be no deaths. However, this is wrong. These drugs are harmful. Even though it stops on the war of drugs, there is still some bad things in the drugs. Even though the war of drugs end, does not mean that drugs will become healthier and the drugs or smoking will not kill anyone.2. Again if the solution is that we legalize the drugs, it will not be beneficial for the health and people will be in cancer or die. Even if we make smoking illegal, and they sell it, that should be illegal also because it is illegal to sell illegal things. There is a second way. Don't make them get profit by not buying these cigarettes. I think they should get destroyed. Please tell me if there is any benefit of smoking so we should not ban it.3. Con's argument is that it regards the economy. The economy will be bad and get lower, Con says. However, even though we have smoking, there will be some bad economy problems also. Otherwise of that, it is okay, because the people's health and the lives makes more money which is a better economy. Also, India causes child labour which means they should not legalize smoking.Arguments1. Okay now I will go on my first argument in the third round. It is about smoking has a high cost which is the expensive cost of smoking.Usual places have about 7$ for one smoking pack. If you smoke like this, you will approximately use about 3000 dollars a year. That is a lot of money used for smoking. This is because it is nothing compared to its cost. It is useless. These people just paid their money on useless things. This means that because of the high cost of smoking and nothing good about it, we should ban smoking.2. Weak bonesThis is particularly on weak bones. Smoking should be banned because it causes harm to people. It makes weak bones. Weak bones are very bad and also they have a higher percentage of a hip fracture than a non-smoker.3. Smoking causes pollution. What is pollution?Pollution is bad stuff in the air we breathe in. With higher pollution, we will have worse lungs and the air we breathe in is very dirty and disgusting. This is mainly caused by cars and factories by the gas. However, this comes out in smoking too.Smoking has the air that comes because of the fire. That smoke pollutes the air and causes damage to it. Basically, we breathe in the gas that a car gives away? Smoking is that bad. Because smoking harms the environment, thus we should ban smoking.Thank you. Defending my case and extra rebuttals go in my next round. Sources http://www.livestrong.com... http://hd.ingham.org...Thank you.