Evolutionism Vs. Creationism

Since my opponent can't realize his own words I mine as well give up trying to debate him. The analogy he gave said something like this: 'believing in Creationism or the Bible is like believing in Mother Goose stories,' am I not correct? So if Creationism, and the Bible, have scientific facts and points that prove it's truth, my opponent thinks that scientific facts are also like Mother Goose rhymes. Are there SCIENTIFIC, PROVEN, FACTS that Spiderman lived? Stop referring my THEORY to lame stories and do some research. I called it a theory because Creationism fits the "theory" definition, and no less than Evolution does. Where's your debunks for the Book of Genesis? Here I know for sure you'll have to do some research. It depends what my opponent mean by "biology changing." And what I admitted is not just that "biology changes," but that "things in biology change AND there are some facts that lead to Evolution, but that doesn't mean Evolution itself is a fact." Is that even 'admitting' anything? I don't think so. The other thing I said is that, tu quoque, YOU wouldn't admit Creationism was fact because it has lots of facts leading to it, or at least you'd think of something to say instead of admitting Creationism is fact. "creationismdesign.org" wasn't supposed to prove you anything but instead to show you a bit of how unstable and dumb the Theory of Evolution is. The thing that makes us not "believe" in God, or rather the obstacle which keeps us from believing there's a Creator, is evil. There is always this lingering something which causes us not to want to believe in God, and the society doesn't want us to think that because God is powerful and there IS a possibility of there being a Creator God. With all this in mind, if 'God' were your answer to the question previously, that wouldn't make any sense because my opponent doesn't even have a description of who God is! If I were to ask you who you think God is from an atheist's point of view I'm sure you'd say the negative, such as un-loving and 'dumb for creating us,' etc. But I ask you to present and defend your case for how and why you say "God" is the reason that would make you believe in God. How would you know WHO an all-powerful and Of Higher Intelligence, Creator God, even is, since we are so much less than Him? In my opinion, God is in...nature and even in certain people. So I ask you again, please use a Biblical perspective, what would make you believe in God? If you know one of the main things about DNA, it has information. The information of these tiny cells equals to a written amount of, forgive me, books. What 99% species are extinct because of gene problems and how do you know that? Where's the proof? If Evolution doesn't have a clue what it's doing, why are there humans, the smartest (by far) of what you call "animals?" My opponent keeps interpreting and twisting what I say I did so to make everyone think I'm a hypocrite, liar and ignorant. I don't like this type of arguing, especially in this debate; it is really annoying. I decided to stop watching the video because it said Evolution is a fact, period. Did you watch my video? This is too easy to answer. It seems to me my opponent is mad at me for some reason but I can't tell if he's mad at my 'beliefs' or because I'm getting onto him somehow, if anyone knows what I mean! I'm defending Creationism and explaining it to my opponent. This is Evolution vs Creationism, not just about Evolution in case he forgot. My opponent hasn't given anything wrong with Creationism yet, so I don't see why it's wrong. There are many kinds of science, dare I say to my opponent, yet you claim the 'quantum world' doesn't do what normal science does. My opponent's last sentence was explained earlier to him by me saying what I actually said, not just "things in biology change."