Instead of letting transgender students use what ever sports team or bathroom they want we should...

CorrectionPhysical form not physical appearance. The person's body may be the physical format that society typically ascribes as belonging to boys but they dress up looking like a girl, then if they want to play sports they should be allowed to do so on the Kronker's team not the Nonker's team.How is it different?It's different because we're not labeling the bathrooms and sports teams as "boy's" and "girl's" and hence not making any statements as to what the user of these rooms and sports teams genders are.People not being naked in the bathroomBut we want an environment where transgender children can feel comfortable with being open about who they are. That would promote more tolerance and acceptance. This would also mean that for example, Girl Nonker Kelsey will know that Girl Kronker Tiffany has a penis and testicles and since people often speak of it being OK to be in the same bathroom (or gym lockerroom) on the basis "we have the same parts anyways" then it's likely Kelsey would not feel comfortable with Tiffany being in the same bathroom as her. We may still recognize Tiffany is indeed a "her" and a "girl" but her physical form is "Kronker" not "Nonker" so she must use a bathroom that is more appropriate for her physical form.Another reason is that the ones now known as "Boy's Rooms" which I propose renaming "Kronker's Rooms" have yournels. Perhaps Tiffany thinks of herself as a girl but does not desire to change her genitals, some transgender people don't and even still likes using the yournel in spite of her "girl" gender identity. There may be many mtf transgender/transsexuals who still like using yournels. So this is really a better arrangement even for transsexual/transgender students.Many Kronker's Rooms will also have less stalls thanks to having yournels so we're not doing Nonker Boys any favors by making them go to the same room as Kronker Boys. The stalls may all be taken and then they have no where to go. Furthermore Kronker boys getting curious about sexuality even if they are straight may think that a Nonker boy having a vagina is "at least something" and this sets us up for sexual harrassment in the bathroom.And there's also that a child might just lie and say they are transgender just to sneak around the other bathroom. It is better if we just rename the bathrooms so that the segregation is based solely on physical form and makes no presumptions that the physical forms are supposed to be certain genders.On Sports TeamsIt's more important to maintain the distinction here for the sake of fairness. Yes, some students might fall outside these tendancies but since overwhelmingly a person of Kronker physical form will be stronger and more agile than a person of Nonker physical form then it at least isn't fair for a Kronker to be allowed on a Nonker team. It would mean that most Nonkers wouldn't be able to even be on the team.If Transgender Students Can Go Where ever They Want then So Should Other StudentsIt's only fair and this would essentially mean having coed sports teams eliminating sports opportunities for all but a few girls and not to mention ftm transgender students (so in this context Nonkers lose opportunities for athleticism). It would also mean coed bathrooms and gym locker rooms. That's setting up a whole bunch of opportunities for sexual harrassment.It is important that we respect and honor the gender identities of what ever gender a child identifies with, but there's no rule that segregations of bathrooms and sports teams must be based on gender, so instead we should base them on the physical form and give the physical forms different naems than the child's gender.