Is Terridax comment about this poem accurate

Didn't think you would actually take this seriously, but if you are, I will too. My arguments first, then refuting his arguments. 1. Terridax has far more credibility than you do; if you compare Terridax's win percentage, 100% out of 3 debates, to yours, 11.32% out of 68 debates - or if you compare Terridax's ELO rating, 2200, to yours, 1000, it is obvious who has more ethos. As such, his comment, "After reading it for about a minute I had to stop because it was so horrible," is probably true. 2. It is obvious that you, shakuntala, are also gamahucher, the author of this poem. Not only have you started other debates where you applaud your own writing, but the Sufis Garden Bk. 2 has 0 likes and no ratings - as you are obviously a fan of gamahucher's writing, the only possible reason why you have not liked or rated gamahucher's "erotic poetry" already is because you ARE gamahucher. As such, what you are doing this website is essentially just self-advertisement, something I will talk about in my third point. 3. You are breaking the terms of service of this website. According to this excerpt from the Terms of Use at http://www.debate.org...: You agree to use the Debate.org's service in accordance with the following content posted and code of conduct guidelines: Will not upload, copy, distribute, share, or otherwise use Content that is unlawful, obscene, defamatory, libelous, harmful, hateful, harassing, pornographic, threatening, racially or ethnically offensive, abusive, that would violate another person's rights, constitute or encourage a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or violate any local, state, national, or international law or regulation, or that is otherwise inappropriate. Will not use the Service to artificially generate traffic or page links to a Website or for any other purpose not intended for personal, noncommercial use of the Service. As this poem, self-proclaimed as "erotic," is obviously inappropriate, pornographic, and possibly even obscene, and because I have already proven in my second point that you are advertising yourself and trying to draw traffic to a website, I will be reporting you after I finish writing this Round and I recommend anyone who reads this debate to do the same. On to your points: I agree with both definitions of horrible, as they both apply to your writing. 1. Arousing or tending to arouse horror; dreadful. Yeah, this poem aroused horror in me when I read it, not because of the content of the writing, but because of the utter lack of writing sophistry, syntax, diction, and overall ability. You are a very bad writer my friend. It may have gotten better further in, but I was only able to read the first few stanzas before my eyes started bleeding and I had to be driven to the ER. Additionally, if I were to read this poem to a baby, or a child, I may be charged for unintentional manslaughter, a crime that I am sure would arouse horror within me. I'm sorry, but any poem that is written in size 500 font probably isn't all that good. 2. Very unpleasant or disagreeable. Self-explanatory. I'll just copy and paste the passage that the con used: Oh to see the face of my beloved bright like noon day sun Oh I like sickle-shaped moon or the split moons face laced in necklaces of stars like upturned candles bright for thee does upon this path long for thee do long again Oh that the moon-faced cunt to I wouldst reveal its sight to me My soul breathes a thousand sighs each pore of my drying flesh laments for the sight of thee Oh I plead with thee send forth the fragrance of thy breath Send forth the sight that enraptured on it my soul might be I look forward to your reply.