Official Debate Tournament: Badger is a Retard/Troll

1) Debate History Badger doesn't think he confessed to wasting people's time. He wrote in round 3: "I don't put much effort in when i do debate, most of the time, or get distracted and forfeit, or write rounds while intoxicated in some way." When you get distracted or intoxicated and forfeit a debate, you ruin the debate. You waste the other person's time. It is very simple. Badger says in addition to drinking, he also takes speed. He probably takes many other types of drugs while posting on these forums. He tries to use them as an excuse for is incoherence, which is fine, but he's CONCEDING incoherence. All in all, we can't know for sure if Badger's goal is to waste people's time, but he does it anyway. This is why the resolution is over whether badger is incoherent/moronic/trolling (see round 1). Take your pick. 2) Badger's Profile Badger is clearly lying because the probability of being an uber rich black muslim teacher in Kansas is really low. His continued defense of this claim is clearly trolling, as he elsewhere in the debate claims to be Irish. The Llama is also trolling. 3) Quotes Badger claims to have been talking about Ancap as a barter system. No one uses this definition. This is even after I told him that Ancap would have private currency, and the he should go read the wikipedia article on Anarcho capitalism. Furthermore, to think that Rob, a self described communist who uses capitalism as a swear word, is an anarcho capitalist is incredibly stupid. Badger goes on to say that he doesn't think currency requires a government. This is inconsistent with his earlier position I quoted in Round 2: "for there to be currency there'd have to be kingdoms/governments pretty much.." Again, Badger is (intentionally) incoherent. Badger says he flip-flopped on Rob because the definition of anarcho capitalism changed. No it didn't. Anarcho capitalism means non-aggression. I told him that several times myself, and he has been told endlessly by others. Badger simply had the WRONG definition of anarcho capitalism because he's trolling and/or moronic. Lastly, Badger tries to twist his faux pas on minarchism/anarchism. He now says he meant to ask why anarchism wouldn't turn into a government. He did no such thing. He just said that anarcho capitalism requires "big motherf**king fortresses on top of things to own them". So he's not bringing up some technical point about the course of anarcho capitalist societies, he's just blankly asserting that anarcho capitalism would require apocalyptic slave machines. What a colorful imagination. Conclusion Badger's basic technique has been to repeat my own arguments against him in an effort to save face. "Yes Sieben, I know I say a lot of stupid stuff on purpose okay?" Well, that's really generous, but it means Badger is a stupid troll. Badger's debate history speaks to his incoherence. All of my claims about his poor behavior stand untouched. All he can say is that it's not his fault if he is chronically intoxicated. Causality aside, his incredibly poor performance and ending debates prematurely with "I'm an idiot :)" kind of prove he's an idiot. My burden from Round 1 was to "prove that badger regularly engages in (intentionally) incoherent and moronic behavior.". His debates are consistently horrible. His profile is a bad joke. His interactions on the forums are imbecilic at best. He's practically on my side.