Osama Bin Laden should not have being killed.

How rare the orders are is irreverent what I was saying is that this target is far to important to let get away by getting killed or escaping, the only win scenario here for the united states is if OBL was captured and his contacts and intel was exposed. Naturally every thing would not have being kept on hard drives and on documents, so then the most sensitive intel would have probably only have being known to OBL. What should have being done in the event of OBL being armed is that the highly trained and skilled SEALS disarm him or shoot to wound thus preventing him from causing harm or escape. you argument for having no proof of OBL having life saving information is laughable at best. I kind of feel that I don't need to tell you all the points why be suppose I should any way. 1) even though OBL was no longer active in al-Qaeda dose not mean all of his information becomes irreverent he was still protected so naturally he had friends, so if that's the case who where they and what is their contention to al-Qaeda. 2)Naturally every thing would not have being kept on hard drives and on documents so the most sensitive intelligence would have being known only to OBL. (he might have know codes, systems, and most importantly people and locations,) 3) ect. ect. and whatever I have faith in your intelligence you know this. He is now a Martyr now there is nothing to be done about that now. Al-Qaeda can now be motivated by revenge killing, and have some one well known and beloved to fight for putting name to the cause. Worst of all now it is to late to defame him anything said now will be disregarded as lies to deface his righteous name. Now they have a name to their cause. A good example of this kind of thing provoking a far greater response is the Alamo "remember the Alamo! " it seems the United Sates government does not. Well you seem to agree with me on this any way "and now al-queda wouldn't have as much to fight for, unless they attempt to avenge his death" I really do not think that anyone would PREFER violence as a way of sending a message. I also remember the United states doing something similar to 9/11 over the sky's of Japan, twice in fact. So the United states hardly has the high ground there. However this would never justify an attack on a civilian population just don't go acting like al-Qaeda were the first ones to attack civilians. From what was said in the video was that the SEALS took shots at OBL when he was unarmed AND that they shot dead his unarmed sons(strategically not as important), so the SEALS never wanted to even try to capture OBL, and it turns out that this was just an emotional government seeking revenge and blood. I have to say this makes me ashamed, one of the most powerful countries in the world is putting revenge before the lives of the innocent. Then they celebrate his death much in the same manner that the people of the French revolution celebrated the mass murder of their leaders. I really though we had learnt our lesson now and went trough due process instead. Against my better judgement will call this act barbaric, however I intend no offense and would like to point out that this is purely speculative. Some head on a stick sir?