Liberalism Or Conversativism: The Future

Here I present to you my political propositions, and why I believe that centre left politics (see comments section) is better than conservative right (far right in your case) wing views (for humanity). I will begin by discussing said beliefs, and at the same time I will interlink some of the categories you have suggested. Not all, I'd run out of space. Need for Change: Left: Radical change, without implementation, act now the world is a mess Right: Slow gradual change, with implementation, because the world is fine as it is. Economy: globalisation should benefit humans rather than corporations, as most corps don't invest in local communities (multiplier effect). Rarely do you find a successful business that has a clean, clear cut Corporate Social Responsibility , perhaps Shell being the exception I know of. Liberals understand the environmental aspect of running business, but at the same time are aware that ignoring it would be more profitable for the company. I feel conservatives, well the ones I know, are solely success oriented, with little compassion for community or the environment. Regarding Patriotism: I care about family , friends/colleagues, and the effects I have of others, what my country does, whether right /wrong, is none of my business. Only fools rush to take sides. Equality: 1a) Gender: Liberals like me believe humans are delicate-fragile individuals, much like any other animal. Connies are pro gender role (women-home, men-work) however if you look at stats we are now finding out that woman are highly intelligent, whereas men are subject to ego and competition. Most far right wingers from Nazis and Fascists believe in superiority over other segments of society, which brings me up to this next point.... 1b) Racism: It is proven that racists all of kinds, especially far right ones have a hardwired fear of accepting other aspects of society. When the typical connie says "all these immigrants are coming here and taking our jobs", they are not considering the effects of an improved trade relation with said country, eg UK_Poland., not forgetting the increased income from travel booms. Immigrants work, racists bark. Similarly religious folk have deep insecurities, they hold their holy texts dear to them, not recognising the state of the world around them. 1c) Sexuality) In terms of society, its hard to deny humans are civilised animals, and not robots. Open sexuality is seen in many animals, eg giraffes. The things we do in life are based on energy spikes (similar to the theory of Chakra), sexuality is an energy, some express it different to others. Much like racism, those in power fear people will gain peace in the community, many right-wingers are raised to be homophobic, this isn't their fault, its like if i was raised hate grapes, i'd never touch it unless overcame said fear. In a way. The only thing keeping me unbiased is that open sexuality will result in more stds. https://www.psychologytoday.com... Economic Expense Distribution: We need to focus on education and health care, rather than counter-terrorism. Connies argue that if we don't counter terrorists, we wouldn't have an infrastructure. What i'm saying is reduce the funds, and reimburse it in to relevant sectors, as the health care is in dire straits. Privatising it would help those who can afford it, therefore improving services for them. However, remaining public suits the common man, but that would mean poorer services, a combo of both is best. Exact same case for education, in these cases quantity trumps quality if lives are involved. I can relate to this, my primary school and uni were both public, but high school and college were private, so I have witnessed both aspects. I agree lower taxes, but they should solely be reinvested into public-community services. Tax has been distributed pretty unfairly. However, Businesses need heavy regulations otherwise they'd take liberties, see my point on csrs. However, since i do have a degree in Business Management, and am I aware that sometimes its financially better to exploit potential (cheap labour, landfill etc), not saying its morally acceptable, just best for business. Welfare/Benefits: Although people do take advantage of it, many people with disabilities, anxieties, and injuries rely on it just to survive. Not everyone is raised with a go-get it work ethic. Connies are taught that you need to work for a living, and that's why most are against the benefit system. Likewise, many argue tramps choose to be tramps, see above. At the end of the day, Conservatism is similar to the law of the jungle, meaning the weak will fail, simply due to a lack of resources, whereas Centre Left believes in resource distribution and at the same time financial independence. I know leftwing socialism doesn't work, there'd be no drive and ambition. I'm pro-abortion, it is solely up to the mother based on her condition (she may have prior birthing difficulties, may be unfit, unable to support, live in a high drug rate area, could've been raped). Connies argue that is murder, but i don't think a foetus will care, as mentioned on a separate debate. Lastly for now, border security: i've witness it first hand, since 9/11 officers show bias against people of colour, again due to fear. Border security is only beneficial for drug smuggling control.