I Will Not Say Anything Typically/Universally Offensive, Snarky, Or Rude In This Debate

FrameworkThe point of my questions and the corresponding answers of my opponent was to prove that for most questions, every thing affects everybody. According to the rules, if my opponent says anything offense, snarky, or rude, I will win. I will go through each questions one by one to determine how she has offended people. Everything offends somebody, but some more than others.Analyzation of Answers1. My opponent explicitly stats that she has not stopped discriminating against black peope. This is highly offensive towards the black race and can be viewed as snarky towards blacks.2. My opponent has stated that she does not support the Nazi Party. However, there are still people that support it. The only reason somebody would not support a party is because of its ideology or actions. My opponent does not like the actions of the Nazi Party. This is snarky towards the ideology of the Nazi Party and offensive to Nazis.3. My opponent has stated that global warming is not a myth. Some scientists have signed the petition against man-made global warming (1). Therefore she is being snarky and offensive towards their beliefs.4. My answer to this question is exactly the same of the global warming one. Some scientists, such as Henry M. Morris, Ph.D. don't believe in evolution. She is being snarky and offensive to their beliefs and to the beliefs of those who don't support evolution.5. I'll leave this one as is.6. My opponent has stated that she doesn't believe that some races have a higher IQ than others. This is snarky towards the beliefs of those who do. Ex. Jimtimmy7. My opponent has stated that she does not support science. Not only is this offensive, snarky, and rude to nearly all scientists, but also the general population who believes in science.8. My opponent has stated that the Keystone XL pipeline ought to be built. Many First Nations, especially in Canada, protest the devlopment of the Keystone pipeline because it infringes on their land and collective rights (3). They have in fact joined in protest. This belief that the pipeline ought to be built is offensive and snarky to the rights and beliefs of First Nations peoples.9. Low character space so I'll leave as is.10. My opponent has stated that she believes money is important in life. Many people believe that money is not important in life (4). This statement is snarky towards their beliefs.11. Made a mistake with the wording of the question. :(12. My opponent states that she has not taken down the photos of Hitler in her room. The question that I posed implies that she already had photos of Hitler in her bedroom. She has not taken them down. Hitler is known for his notriety among the whole world. Photos of Hitler in one's bedroom will obviously be offensive towards some people.13. My opponent has stated that she would kill one to save five. Although this is acceptable, it is obviously offensive. If you were that one person who would have to be killed, you would be deeply hurt and distraught about your fate.14. Meh.15. Since my opponent has considered suicide, we can assume that it was offensive to the people close to her. Nobody wants to see their close relative/friend kill themselves so the very thought that she wanted to commit suicide would be highly offensive to those close to her.Recap1. Offensive2. Offensive3. Offensive4. Offensive5. Meh.6. Offensive7. Offensive8. Highly Offensive9. Meh.10. Offensive11. My bad.12. Highly Offensive.13. Offensive.14. Meh.15. Offensive(1)http://www.telegraph.co.uk...(2)http://www.icr.org...(3)http://www.cbc.ca...(4)http://knol.google.com...;