The existence of God

Ok...What/Who is God, (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) The creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being (in certain other religions) A superhuman being or spirit worshiped as having power over nature or human fortunes; a deity Now, nothing that is true is true, but for which it's true is true. God exist, it doesn't have to be that we see his presence to believe he exist. For he is in the "heaven."If we humans exist, than why can't a person/supreme being exist. Like President's are the supreme ruler of the land so it is with a "God" being the supreme being.Let me further, i'm not sure or know that you're born in the 1990's. And if you were born in the 1990's and Abraham Lincoln is born March 4, 1861, you wouldn't known the existance of Abrham Lincoln if it hadn't been for History Book. Now let's say we were debating on the existance of Abraham Lincoln and i say that Abraham Lincoln doesn't existance you wouldn't in no way proof your point because you cannot show the presence of him in front of me. Only to state that he's in the "history book" that's how it is with "God""Fideists acknowledge that belief in the existence of God may not be amenable to demonstration or refutation, but rests on faith alone. The Catholic Church maintains that knowledge of the existence of God is available in the "natural light of human reason" alone.[3] Other religions, such as Buddhism, do not concern themselves with the existence of gods at all." the fact that i am a christian and i believe that there is a God proves that there is an existance of God. But you not believing there is a God shows that you don't believe in the existance of God. So if we where theorically argument on the existance of God none of us will win, because the matter of fact is that we both have different religious belief, or views. Now, from reading the bible and other sources of christaian and God do i believe there is a God.Let me further, Ontological argument Main article: Ontological argument The ontological argument has been formulated by philosophers including St. Anselm and René Descartes. The argument proposes that God's existence is self-evident. The logic, depending on the formulation, reads roughly as follows:[21] God is the greatest conceivable being. It is greater to exist than not to exist. Therefore, God exists.[21] Empirical arguments[edit]Aquinas' Five Ways Main article: Quinque viae For in depth analysis of the individual arguments, see unmoved mover, first cause, argument from contingency, argument from degree, or teleological argument. In the first part of his Summa Theologica, Thomas Aquinas developed his five arguments for God's existence. These arguments are grounded in an Aristotelian ontology and make use of the infinite regression argument.[18][19] Aquinas did not intend to fully prove the existence of God as he is orthodoxly conceived (with all of his traditional attributes), but proposed his Five Ways as a first stage, which he built upon later in his work.[20] Aquinas' Five Ways argued from the unmoved mover, first cause,necessary being, argument from degree, and the teleological argument. The unmoved mover argument asserts that, from our experience of motion in the universe (motion being the transition from potentiality to actuality) we can see that there must have been an initial mover. Aquinas argued that whatever is in motion must be put in motion by another thing, so there must be an unmoved mover.[18] Aquinas' argument from first cause started with the premise that it is impossible for a being to cause itself (because it would have to exist before it caused itself) and that it is impossible for there to be an infinite chain of causes, which would result in infinite regress. Therefore, there must be a first cause, itself uncaused.[18] The argument from necessary being asserts that all beings are contingent, meaning that it is possible for them not to exist. Aquinas argued that if everything can possibly not exist, there must have been a time when nothing existed; as things exist now, there must exist a being with necessary existence, regarded as God.[18] Aquinas argued from degree, considering the occurrence of degrees of goodness. He believed that things which are called good, must be called good in relation to a standard of good – a maximum. There must be a maximum goodness that which causes all goodness.[18] The teleological argument asserts the view that things without intelligence are ordered towards a purpose. Aquinas argued that unintelligent objects cannot be ordered unless they are done so by an intelligent being, which means that there must be an intelligent being to move objects to their ends: God.[18] If there isn't a God, than why would the US, the greatest country in the world, that give everyone freedom, have on the dollar bill "In God we trust", some of US buildings are incrave with God's writing. The President, and our politicans, are to put their hand on the bible to repeat after whatever the man is saying. "So help me God." but i'm not going to use this as my argument. but i'm only trying to put out.http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.google.com...;