BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Today's Youth Misuses Mobile Phones And The Internet

okey, i agree that it happens. but you might have read the next sentence also that its rare. why should we blame all the youths for the mistakes done by a few. you are also young.isn't it? okey,then,let me ask you one question. are you misusing all these............. WHEN THERE IS A POSITIVE SIDE,THERE WILL BE A NEGATIVE SIDE ALSO one cannot plot all the negative sides of everything. if so happens,then its his fault.
Today's Youth Misuses Mobile Phones And The Internet

Ok, so what my opponent is saying that she didn't actually mean everyone correctly uses mobile phones and internet with the right purpose, but she meant "a considerable number of youths" use them correctly. I offer to follow this "newly" proposed topic. "for example, if a father kills his child, it doesn't mean that we cant believe any father in this world, or if a doctor kills his patient only for money........" What my opponent is saying that a whole group cannot be blamed for one of the group member's immoral act. Although it is argumentative, I accept this point for now. However, does only "one" youth misuse mobile phones or internet? Since my opponent did not represent the standard of judging(only a portion of misuse is not considered as misuse), I will represent some data that show youths actually use cell phones or internet with various purposes other than just the original use of them. I will assume that my opponent thought the orginal usage of mobile phones and internet should be "communication," since that's the original reason why they were invented. Talk into the phone 8 7.62% LOL Internet 50 47.62% SMS 19 18.10% Email ur homies 10 9.52% Super Monkey Flashlight 1 0.95% Listen to music/books/podcasts/sound effects 11 10.48% Map crap 2 1.90% Other obscure freaky stuff 4 3.81% [http://forums.macrumors.com...] Play games 16 42.11% Chat all Day 23 60.53% Pose Wid it 13 34.21% Attract the Opposite Sex with it 13 34.21% <------------------ is it the right usage? [http://www.techjamaica.com...] Ironically, youths use mobile phones to use "internet" these days, and this poll supports that not only "1" youth misuses phones, but almost half of them use mobile phones other than the original intention of its inventor. I see no further point of representing my arguments. My opponent did not define "misuse," and the purposes of internet and mobile phones can be various. If my opponent actually explained how internet and mobile phones contain various forms of purposes, and people who are capable of utilizing all of the contents of internet and mobile phones should not be blamed for "misusing" but instead "smart or crafty"
Today's Youth Misuses Mobile Phones And The Internet

my opponent think that i am supporting him. but i think he didnt understand what i mean. "it doesn't imply any portion of a group, so if I can prove that even one youth misuses mobile phones, internet, then it's my win." obviously, i am talking about a group. for example, if a father kills his child, it doesn't mean that we cant believe any father in this world, or if a doctor kills his patient only for money........ will you agree that all doctors in this world are like this........ i hope that your answer will be NO. so its not possible to believe that all youths misuses mobiles just because my opponent prove that one youth is misusing all these. in your next argument, please answer the question i asked you in my previous round that "are you misusing all the facilities given by your parents" if so you are not an ideal youth. todays youth is the future of this world. if they misuse all these,we wont be getting this much technologies. world is developing day by day. so once again, we should not blame the youths for the mistake done by a few.
JFK was assassinated by the ghost of Doc Holliday

J.F.K was killed in 1963 in Dallas, Texas. The motorcade turned left from Houston Street onto Elm Street, driving through Dealey Plaza, where the president was assassinated. The street on which the president was killed will become important later. [1]Among other things Doc Holliday was a gunfighter and a dentist. In 1873, Holliday opened a dental office in Dallas, Texas. The dental office was located on Elm Street. The very same Elm Street that J.F.K. was assassinated on. In fact, Holliday’s office was mere blocks from where the murder took place. Holliday had a habit of getting into gun fights. At one point he was shot by a fellow gambler and reported dead in the Dallas Weekly Herald. But he wasn’t dead. Not yet.[2] Have you ever seen The Nightmare on Elm Street before? Did you know the movie was based on actual events? There have been stories all throughout the world about people who have nightmares and then are found dead. You didn’t realize that did you? Wes Craven got the name of the street right. It was the name of the killer he got wrong. [3][4] If you watch closely on the Zapruder film, moments before J.F.K.’s head was shot, he appears sluggish. His is drooping down and it appears he’s nodded off. Not surprising, the president is a very busy man and probably doesn’t get a lot of rest. I submit to you that just before he gets shot, J.F.K dozed off, and right as his wife goes to wake him (you can see in the video she leans over to him) his head is blown off. Killed, by none other than the Dream Master himself, Doc Holliday. I rest my case. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...[3] http://mytruestory.com...[4] http://www.forteantimes.com...[5] http://www.youtube.com...
JFK was assassinated by the ghost of Doc Holliday

Obviously this isn't going to be a very serious debate, but I will do my best to present the evidence. Definitions:JFK - John Fitzgerald Kennedy. The 35th President of the United States of America.Assassinated - The murder of a prominent person or political figure by surprise attack.Ghost - Soul or spirit of a dead person or animal that can appear, in visible form or other manifestation, to the living.Doc Holliday - John Henry "Doc" Holliday. An American gambler, gunfighter, and dentist of the American Old West who is usually remembered for his friendship with Wyatt Earp and his involvement in the Gunfight at the O.K. Corral.Rules:There won't be any real formal rules. I ask that we both remain polite to one another. No other conspiracy theories shall be brought into this discuss, as all the conspiracy theories are false and we're here to argue the facts. I will be arguing for the affirmative, you will be arguing for the negative. And in such a case that either of us forfeit it is highly probable that we are getting too close to the truth and were assassinated for it. However, since it would be impractical and infeasible to require the opponent to investigate the cause of our disappearance, if either party forfeits they automatically lose the debate, and the disappearing party's side should never be brought up again.I will keep this debate short in order to keep it on track.1st round: Acceptance2nd round: Present arguments and rebuttals3rd round: Rebuttals and closing statements.Have fun, and to the victor goes the spoils.
Christianity is the Right Religion Part 1

Never mind what I said in the comments. If you would like to reply to that then do so in the comments. I will be taking the side Christianity is not the right religion without using another religion for support. BibleFor you to be true the Bible must be accepted as the word of God. If not I await arguments to tell me why the Bible is the word of God. I do not want circular reasoning since I have to agree on your premises. ChristianityChristianity cannot be the right religion because the religion is not right. One example is the dislike of homosexuals. To me this is not a problem if the person in question does it in the comfort of his own home or somewhere out of your site like a gay club. Homosexuals are not choosing to be gay they were born to be so. Even if it does tend that they have a sexual experience at an earlier age with the same sex it only makes its more clear to them what they prefer. I would like you to somehow defend the dislike of homosexuals. PhilosophyAs ideas Christianity is still bad as a morality framework. It allows belief to be superseded by rationale or become intellectually dishonest. Christian scientist are first Christian which does give them a bias in proving the Bible right. In most cases this does not make their arguments wrong but they would do anything to prove their religion to be true. Another way Christianity is a bad philosophy is by looking at what the Bible thinks of slavery. From the source below it is already agreed slavery should be something worth protecting and states slaves should be obedient to their masters. Which is not fair on the slaves in question. Why are slaves a good thing? Why does the Bible condone it? I would say it is infringing on the person's rights but the Bible has nothing against slaves if it tells slaves to be obedient to their masters instead of aspiring to not be slaves and live as equals in rights. Source:https://www. Biblegateway. Com/passage/? Search=Ephesians+6%3A5-7&version=NIV
Christianity is the Right Religion Part 1

I would be glad to debate Christianity with you. I want to just say that a Christian, According to the Bible, Is one who accepts Jesus as their Savior and repents from their sin in order to gain salvation. Any religion that believes salvation is by works or a religious acts is not saved according to Ephesians 2:8-9, Isaiah 64:6, John 3:16. So please present your reason why Christianity is not the true religion.
Christianity is the Right Religion Part 1

Pro does not understand for Christianity to be the right Religion it would have to be correct while others are false. The reason why Pro does not like me bringing other Religions in is that it proves his claims wrong. If I only need to change the word Christianity to Islam or Judaism and that Religion would still be correct means his arguments are bad. This whole time I have only been talking about the Bible's unity. For the Bible to be correct it must be correct from the other Religions. You still have not showed me why Christianity is the right Religion. I missed out your claims since you did not accept what I said in Round 1. I did not want circular reasoning. Besides my arguments in earlier Rounds can be used here just in a different context. This shows your lack of knowledge of what the Old Testament requires, A blood sacrifice once a year for the forgiveness of sin. The Jews today do not practice this command. Do you follow everything in the Bible? I highly doubt it. No evidence has been given to this claim about Jews not doing it so I would say Jews do commit blood sacrifices. I gave you evidence of Muhammad saying that the Bible is the Word of God. So Christianity, Judaism and Islam say that the Scriptures are the Word of God. Evidence required a link of some sort not your word. If I thought your word was enough evidence I wouldn't be asking you for evidence. Let me put it to you like this:God's Word is indestructible. The bomb, Though is totally new, God's Word is not. Its message stays the same and the words stay the same. I have clearly laid out why the Bible is not indestructible in the previous Round. Whether it be new or not does not factor in it being indestructible for that reason Pro did not provide a claim against my point. God created humans to have fellowship with Him. The humans were perfect, But they decided to break God's command to not eat of a certain tree. They saw the tree and coveted it and wanting to be like God they ate of it. Still have not told me how the Bible is the right Religion so I am left with either basing your claim on faith or do as I did in the earlier Rounds not accept your claim since I must first accept the Bible to be true for this to be correct.
existence=reality+experience

"no beauty is clearly determine by my eyes.." Sure, you"d need to use you brain as well as your eyes, or your ears if it"s a beautiful piece of music. "a rainbow is an object, without it the beauti goes away." A rainbow isn"t an object, it"s an optical illusion. I could say that rainbows are beautiful in my opinion but not be referring to a specific rainbow that I saw in the past" "1=something" Yes, it"s a concept which you can"t experience physically. "know is the opposite of knowledge.." "you have not been con so far" I don"t know what either of these mean. To conclude, you haven"t demonstrated why existence=reality+experience because the ability to experience something does not necessitate it"s existence in the world. If human experience determines if something in nature exists, all the stars and planets outside of the observable would not be able to exist as a result.
existence=reality+experience

You speak of beauty as though it"s objective. Again, it"s subjective and the state of finding a rainbow beautiful exists in the mind of each individual who shares that state of mind. 'know is physical experience', you mean knowledge? Not always. I know that 1+1=2 but it isn"t a physical thing that I can experience. I know that I don"t know if my neighbour is in. Again, there is no physical experience to speak of but I still have knowledge, do I not? You"re going back to the same statement but you"re not providing an argument to support it. Nor have you provided a counter argument to mine. You have one more opportunity left, vi_spex.
existence=reality+experience

What makes you say that beauty isn"t a mental construct? Beauty is an opinion. Something can be beautiful to one person but ugly to another. It"s subjective" All I can see here is really simplistic deductive reasoning. What does "now is true" and "kNow=physical experience" mean? "Reality=nature+experience" - this really doesn"t follow. Reality exists and continues whether you are there to experience it or not. I can"t experience what is happening 1,000 light years away. Does that mean reality is suspended there? "Existence=nature+life+experience" - but the title says existence=reality+experience" I"ve already shown you that experience does not determine the existence of something, but it is an observation or perception of what is already existing in reality (nature and life). Therefore existence=reality. I appear to have solved your simultaneous philosophical equation for you!
existence=reality+experience

So by 'existence' do you mean objective reality or do you mean survival? I suspect you're refering to the former. If I'm correct, what you're talking about is similar to the question; "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" Except you say that true existence (reality) is your physical experience. I don't really agree because as I said in the comment section, things still happen in the world regardless of whether we can or do experience them. My observable universe example shows that. As for the comment about worms, a rainbow is visually unique to each and every person viewing it because of how the sunlight reflects off and refracts through water droplets. It could be argued that the perceived beauty of a rainbow exists in each individual's mind and so the worm is to the rainbow what humanity is to the depths of the universe.
Rap battle

You added an announcer? I shot him dead :) If you inspect him you might find a bullet to the head You white or black? Well I don't really care either You don't like to keep your finger off the trigger? Me neither I asked for sixteen bars, you gave me god-knows-how-many Man I couldn't find the beat, wait there ain't any I mudered your family, starting with your nanny And then I robbed all the money in her pockets and her fanny- Pack also I'll give you this your sister tasted good I was full after that, pity I had to slaughter such good food Then your mom and your aunt, eaten before they died Too bad you were away to see it with your own eyes Its you left little niggah I got out my gun I ain't even putting in my effort only playing a game and having fun And then Mr Tiger, my friends and I will go out hunting Grilled Masterful, well at least that is something
Rap battle

-------- -Announcer- ---------- "This is McNigguh black Doppel ganger n trigga pulla the 1st of his line, slayer of wannabie gansters and the like, King of the north of Detroit. A bastard boy Akin to the notorious big daddy hoe killa, whom was executed by way of decapitation for smuggling dead hookers into the country." "A.K.A Jon Coke!" Ready on ma triggas, bout to shoot dem lil niggas Bang, lil nigguh fall to the ground, Him and his pre-school gang got downed If I aint pimpin, I gimpin, Sellin pounds of crack to your daughter, Didn't take much, but I bought her, Split wide, leaking red bloody water. You know dat pvssys been in for the slaughter, Ma gang nigguhs be dishing out coke to the elderly, We be shiftin that sh*t so cleverly, I'll kill em if they in debt to me, they dead, now feelin serenity. I hit hard where ever I deal, I hit smack whenever I feel, When I'm carryin I don t need to conceal, Cus ma reputation, dat sh*ts surreal. It aint nothing but a thaang, When you rollin in a trigga pulling gaang, I'll take you back to when niggas used to hang, You gunna be dead, wit a single bang. On a side note, I'm notorious for killin white talkers, So if you white, then be ready for ma gang of stalkers. We'll dragon glass you in the a.s.s, Then we'll chill and blunt up sum grass.
Rap battle

Hi there Masterful not so much of a master Your progress is slow bro you gotta go faster One twig can snap, but ten are hard Im the latter, you are the ret@rd Your "realism" ain't real, despite your belief You should have quit ddo and feed to other's relief Unfortunately you're still here so I will have to make do with it Lets switch to your style you're a little doggy SIT I'm the white one, you're the niggah Do the meaning of the middle finggah 6 bars is already enough to end your life But your entire family requires war and strife Look at this troll account, standing all high and mighty But he doesnt eat chicken he's taking his health lightly Im going to close you aint worth my time My rhymes spit loudly, yours only mime
Rap battle

---Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar Bar. There is yo 16 bars--- ----Game of Unknowns---- Jon Coke ere yo, I'm rollin around holding my crouch, with ma gang of niggahs known as the knights watch, We be stabbin, robbin and killin hoes, this is because they overexpose. The army of the dead is on its way, while Samwell Tarley is being gay, He throwing dangerous gang signs in every which way, which simply undermines the confines of the guidelines, I'm not interested in these gestural mimes cus I wrote these rules, they mine! I got distracted by Sams bad behaviour It's impacted me as I'm the saviour My rims are dope and made of Valerian, My b*tch is hot and I laid a Targaryen, She's the queen of crack where she flies her high, She's lean cus of smack and she fights like a guy My brother is a cripple with three eyes, We all can't wait till the day he dies. He has bad breath and sh*ts his pants, I want to give him penises for leg transplants. He has a side niggah known as Hodor, That guy has the stinkiest odour, They took part in casual sex, Though how they did it was quite complex. I want to give a shout out to ma dead dad Ned, I love him, but I think that he interbred. He thought he was Boromir from Lord of the Rings, But he was only in the porno lord of the ring stings. Some of my gang tried to shank me dead, when I came back I made sure they gave me head, I hung that boy for committing treason, Then I bummed his body for no real reason I can't help but use my lyrical rhetoric, It helps that my flow is satirical and historic, I hope you understand the themed phrasing, Because the meaning and rhymes are deemed amazing.
The Big Bang Theory is Scientifically Impossible

My opponent wants me to PROVE that something cannot come from nothing. But I would ask him, Have you ever observed this occurring? It never has, And that in and of itself proves this point. Next, I am using the true definition of "nothing. " And that is the absence of anything. If something cannot come from nothing, Then the Big Bang theory is impossible. Next, There aren't really any other ways to say "order cannot come from disorder. The Big Bang, As the name obviously implies, Was an explosion. No explosion in history ever created something. Did the 9/11 explosions that occurred bring about any complex creation? Could a nuclear bomb dropped in a junkyard create a new Bugatti Veyron? No! It can not! This is what I mean by that. Now, To answer my opponent's questions. I acknowledge that the universe gives the appearance of expanding, But this is not evidence of evolution. The universe being at a central spot could have happened with either the atheistic or creationist worldviews. Next, Yes, The speed of light is constant in a vacuum, But once again, That doesn't prove anything. If you're going to use the age-old argument that because the light of stars light years away is reaching us, The earth must be billions of years old, That is incorrect. The creationist view supports the idea that just as man was created fully developed, The universe was as well. But this is beside the topic. We aren't talking about the age of the universe. We are talking strictly about the Big Bang. In our last debate, You accused me of going off topic. Looks like you have that tendency too, Huh? Lol I would need examples of physics laws that apply to this topic before I discredit any of them. Your question is very broad, And we need to stick to the topic. So far, You cannot prove that something can come from nothing, And you cannot prove that order comes from disorder. Back to you.
The Big Bang Theory is Scientifically Impossible

You said, "Something cannot come from nothing". Well first off that is a proposition on it's own and you would be responsible for proving that. I know what you meant; however, And I'm not going to tie you down in the philosophical nonsense. I want to actually have a real conversation with you and be productive. I look forward to it :) In the world of physics things are possible that are not common to us on a macro scale. Particles pop in and out of existence, Entanglement occurs (Einsteins spooky action at a distance), Electrons can be in multiple states (superposition) at the same time, Etc. Also, The definition of "nothing" is different in physics than it is in our normal nomenclature. Nothing in physics still has properties, Whereas nothing in our normal usage literally means non-existence/absence of. The word nothing in physics is a bit provocative, I'll admit. I think it was used intentionally to incite attention. But if we are saying something cannot come from nothing we need to first be clear about what "nothing" is. When I say nothing, I will be referring to it's context in relation to physics, Unless stated otherwise. Dr Lawrence Krauss, Despite his recent academic shaming, Is very intelligent and widely respected and he wrote a book on this subject. It's called "A Universe From Nothing". I recommend you read it if you haven't already. You said, "Order cannot come from disorder. " Can you explain further what you mean? I assume you are referring to entropy, But rather than write a response, It would be easier to first get a definition/example. You said, "The Big Bang Theory defies scientific knowledge left and right. " Examples? Please. . Lol Here are my initial questions back towards you. 1) Do you acknowledge that our universe is expanding in an outward direction? 2) Do you acknowledge the speed of light is constant in a vacuum and travels at about 300k meters per second? You can use Google to get the actual number. This site will not let me post it here for some reason. . 3) Are there any laws of physics you do not accept? If so, Why and please provide examples/counter explanations that fit within the model of reality. I look forward to your responses.