Slavery

I am now going to prove to you beyond doubt that slavery is a good system to implement for both the slave and slave owner.My debate rests on two, simple principles:1) The more you do/practice something, the better you get at it.2) The less decisions you have to make before you begin practicing/doing something, the sooner you begin doing it and longer in your life you have left to become better at it.I will firstly demolish Con's debate before proceeding to present the reasoning behind my own.Con states that slavery only benefits the slave owner. His explanation of this is that one example of slavery in history has been that of a racially divided one. I would first like to remind him that there have been non-racist slave trades such as the Irish one[1], Asia and Middle Eastern past and present day slavery and many others. I would also like to remind him that there were black masters and slave traders too at the time of black enslavement. Most blacks happened to be poor and have no white friends to back them up and therefore were an easy target at the time, that was all.Con then mentions that to support slavery, you must support an idea that discriminates against people based on arbitrary characteristics. This is firstly untrue as no slave master would pick a weaker slave over a stronger one if they want them to do manual labor and equally wouldn't pick an illiterate slave over a bilingual one if they want them to both write and translate. Slavery is in fact the only system on Earth where truly the most able to do a job are those who end up doing it.Con argues that the way master and slave is decided is irrationally decided. Equally it is silly that you get a single cent of inheritance from your parents since it's most likely that not a single shred of their income and legacy was your own doing; rather the opposite. Sure, life is unfair and irrational but that doesn't mean a system isn't suitable to work. there's pretty much no country on Earth where the concept of inheritance is totally ignored.Con argues that the natural selection form of slavery is the lowest of them all as it is animalistic. This first of all contradicts his attack on the favoritist method of deciding who is slave and owner and furthermore ignores Darwin's theory of evolution entirely; a major branch of scientific theory.[3] If natural selection decided the slaves from the masters, our species would be the best it could possible be in terms of adapting to its environment and survivability. The fact is we are animals and will only stay as the alpha species if we can be better than not only other animals but any alien species that may invade us one day. the best way to achieve this would be to kill off weak genes and pass on strong ones relative to the genepool, generation after generation.[4] Would you rather a world where we killed the weak or let them be useful as slaves?Now to back my own argument up. It's a common adage that 'practice makes perfect.' and with good reason too.[5] The fact is, the more you do something, the more you do something the easier it transfers from short-term memory to long-term memory according to the multi-store memory model[6] which is highly recognized in psychology.The second part is basically saying that nothing will motivate you or encourage you to practice on specific task over and over unless you know you had to master it no matter what. This ensures you're at your peak ability at that job at all times.[1] http://www.globalresearch.ca... [2] http://libertyasia.org... [3] http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com...[4] http://www.biology-online.org...[5] http://www.brainfacts.org...[6] http://www.simplypsychology.org...