Governments--Religious--People

Since this is my closing argument, I will make this dense. There is just as much evidence of Zeus existing as there is for Jehovah. "The people" you refer to, non-christians, have no reason to understand or believe in the christian god because they either have their own, or just don't believe in any god. If you were to argue with a Muslim whether Jehovah or Allah is the one true god, there would be no end to the debate. Neither of you could provide sufficient evidence that either of your gods are greater than the other because you both believe your gods to be omnipotent. That would be like arguing which superhero could beat which, they're both fictional entities who do not exist in the real world, and are thus subject to only opinions and conjecture. Once you can provide enough evidence of Jehovahs existence, then yes, his power set would dominate the universe and most of the gods humanity has created, but there has yet to be any. Even if you were to completely prove every single event in the bible, there still wouldn't be enough evidence that there is a god. Jehovah himself would have to cause an event so profound and godlike that all the people in the world would have no choice but to listen and believe, but he won't do that because he said, "Do not test me". Convenient that a god who requires his creations to worship him, gave them brains and the ability to question, and then went silent so that the brains he gave could refute his existence, followed by punishing those who used the very ability he gave them. Now, I said in the beginning I would be playing devils advocate against myself, which meant that I would be talking as if the christian god did exist, but the previous paragraph needed to be said. Before we can come to any conclusion about which god is real and which isn't, we must first have sufficient proof, or we might make the wrong choice. I already pointed out why the bible would not be a good law-book for the world to follow, it contains egregious requirements dictated by a tyrannical deity that would make living in this world akin to hell itself. Any human who claims to speak for god would be considered either mad or a false prophet and so that leaves only god to speak for himself, which he obviously hasn't done. Never mind that what you suggest is equivalent to what the violent muslims across the world want to do (the violent ones, not the peaceful ones). Since there are no foundational rules in which to build this world you suggest on, without literal divine intervention, it would be complete anarchy ... which would still be better than following that terrible and malicious book, the bible. When I was a christian, I used to read my bible every single day, looking for answers to life's big questions. Of course, there were none to be had. It all boiled down to, close your eyes, empty your brain, and hope that you don't screw up too bad when trying to live up to the impossible expectations set by a vicious creator. When the shackles of religion finally fell away, my eyes were opened, my brain was filled, and all I could see were the people around me bowing their heads and praying to a dead guy nailed to a wooden cross. Yelling out his name like it would save them from their hardships and reading from a bronze age book that told them they will all burn for being born. I have no intimate experience with other religions to claim one is better, but I do with christianity, and I think it is one of the worst ones to believe in, let alone, build a world government based on it.