Trolls manipulate font's to gain creedo with their masses, the dumb voters.

Thank you for your argument, Pro. I'm afraid, however, that because of your lack of content, I'm unable to make as many rebuttals as I would like, nor do you include any sources, trivial as this debate may be. Before I start, however, I would like to clarify some things before this debate turns into a dirty game of semantics. You are stating that trolls on DDO use elaborate and colorful (actually, you can't color words on DDO, but perhaps it might be added soon) decorations to their posts to gain more votes, correct? Well, I agree with that, but I do not see why that makes them as a "troll," or why that makes the voters "dumb." Let's start, shall we?I. Rebuttals"Font manipulation is clearly marketing, which is profiteering due to greed." To begin with, how is massing votes on DDO marketing? You do not gain even a single cent from winning a debate by a landslide, say, 400 points to 2. In addition, people do not use fonts to be "greedy." They use it to be creative or want a change from the old default font. Everyone has a right to do at least that, considering our freedom of speech! The most preposterous argument that you've held in belief is that you believe colors can affect judgment. Your belief is that if someone uses, say, Comic Sans MS (shudder) and a peculiar font size, do you think they will win from simply that? In fact, it does the contrary, as proved by this veteran debater [1]. SUPPOSE THAT I WROTE LIKE THIS. Do you think that if I continually wrote like that, I would get more voters? Just reading that make my eyes water. I am sorry to inform you I am extremely skeptical of your argument overall.II. ReasoningI will now further pave the way for my argument. Let's use the formula p ⇒ q, to show that if p, then q [2]. My opponent stated that if you use fonts, then you will get more votes. However, I've already disproved that with an example debate and logical reasoning. I will now state that if you use uniform font, then your argument will be easier to read and more preferable to win, as long as the content is well-put. Then, let's conclude our deductive reasoning with the formula p ∴ q, or p, therefore q. I used mild and basic font instead of something wild like before, therefore, I have an increased chance of winning this debate as long as my content is reliable. The same to my opponent as well, as he continuously used the default font, although he did not have any organization in his argument. III. ConclusionBecause of this solid evidence combined with logic, I can confidently maintain the fact that no matter how much font or visual effect someone uses, they will only hinder themselves with their excessive lavishness along with their neglected content. I have also noted that my opponent has failed to provide a debate that supported his argument, where the victor used an odd font, the victor qualified as a "troll" to some degree, and the voters were acutely focused on his font. He has failed to prove any of these three statements, and I am fairly certain that the odds are tilting in this debate. Stay tuned for the final round! I will hungrily await my opponent's final fortifications in his argument.Sources[1] http://www.debate.org...[2] Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Cognitive Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. p. 578.