World government

Hello Danielle, I challenge you to a debate about the topic WORLD GOVERMENT GOOD OR EVIL !!!??? This is my first debate on this site so I am a bit excited. I have read your previous debate over the topic and I...understand your position I truly do. BUT... but it is a position of fear! Fear of the unknown. I understand no one has ever seen a single world government Mankind as a whole united under one banner. Your position that Man has to many differences it cant be united at this TIME. At this time Man could not achieve a functional World Government from now to Tomorrow. No, little steps are nessecary to achieve Mankind's goal of a single unified World Government. Through World Government there would be no wars among Man we would finally have the strength and unity to achieve goals we at our current state could not achieve (stop global warming, over fishing of the sea's, finally get r of all the mine and other dangerous stuff on the war torn places of the earth and maybe go to space but this is far stretching.) to achieve this man has to strip away its "Ego". What are most people saying when you ask them what they are ? They first name there nationality or religion what's the most important them and then the less important things (like Im black or white, Im busniess man etc) . BUT NEVER... NEVER has someoe first said "I am Human being". That sounds a bit hippie like but we are all HUMAN and under a World Government building on the system that everyone is the same wars and other violent acts against fellow Man would turn into absurditiy. There are no resource differnces, cultural diffrences and national differnces to support or even justifiy conflicts. Of course such World government would A: literally the weight of the World on there shoulders. B: fear of the people that the power is missused by the few in charge. Completly understandable fears but lets first get to point A: If there would be a world government it can not function if it is structred as the UNO. The UNO sounded in the past lika myth too and held very high promises when it was firt introdeuced. BUT the way it was structered it could never keep up to its promises and goals. Like a standing UN Army ready to enforce peace and human rights and could hav been useful in rwanda or on the balkan. Why is the UNO so ineffective first: Veto powers they hinder and block every single step which could lead the UN to actual acomplishments and succses and second: Bureaucracy which is a major poit in the UNO ineffectivness. Decisions take month or year which in a crisis situation which requiers quick reactions is unacceptable. A world government would quickliy lead to the tought that with some much bureaucracy World Government would not be capeable to function correctliy. Bt if the World Government was structred with a federal system like the US or germany and all the other 28 nation which are structred after this system the way of a World Government would be shortend to a minmum. Nations would be remain like they are but are now like states like texas for example, who belong to a continet and each continent would sent representivtes to form a senate. A council would watch over them to asure they dont do anything stupid. And because everybody is the same there would be no Veto powers or other powes who could oppress one another. If it is bit counusing I apologies english is not my forte and sometimes I cant organize all my thoughts running throug my head at once so if I worte a bit weird or cryptic please tell me that would help me very much :) I am looking foward hearing (reading your respone) :) and I look forward for an excitng debate with a very cunning person. :)