Anything is possible

P1. Any situation is possible if it follows the laws of the universe The topic explicitly states “anything is possible”, however you’re reasoning is more for “any situation is possible, except when it doesn’t follow the laws of the universe.” There shouldn’t be any conditions if your actually arguing “anything is possible”, no “if ← [condition] it follows the laws”, for that would imply that not following the laws of the universe is impossible. However a counter would be that there could possibly be laws that nullify other laws that make other laws inapplicable to said situation. P2 still has a problem with the same premise despite it being revised. To note revising is technically “case shifting”, in most circles of debate the conduct is looked down upon negatively. Though I’m uncertain with DDO policies on case shifting. That would be your burden of proof to prove that nullifying XYZ law is possible. I’m pretty certain you’re not talking about moral\culture laws that criminals can break, but observable laws of the universe (e.g. law of gravity, motion, Thermodynamics, et cetera). Without demonstration of a law being broken you as pro do have a problem with the burden of proof on the resolution. You would be confirming an antecedent that it is possible, something you can’t prove without empirical demonstration. None of the examples you gave (e.g. Nothing exist, talking cheeseburger, not writing this) are empirically provable. If it’s not empirical, it fails to uphold "Any situaion is within this realm of reality", because you would have to prove that talking cheeseburgers are real (realm of reality), and not something you made up (realm of imagination) to give your examples some fluff. A talking Cheeseburger. There could possibly be a planet where cheeseburgers developed vocal cords which they used to communicate. Possibly. Nope, not possible. The organic composition would be way too inconsistent with each other to be all from one species. Beef comes from cow, tomato comes from a plant, and pickles come from cucumber which comes from a plant. All the ingredients don’t last long enough to support life, usually when vegetables are taken from the plant they start dying. Also, cheeseburgers don’t usually have a long enough life span to evolve with vocal cords, for their eaten shortly after being made, as that is their sole purpose in life, to be devoured. Nothing exists. That is a self-contradicting statement. “Nothing” itself does not exist, at least it means a lack of existence with things (hence no+thing), yet the next word states it does. What do you mean doesn’t follow the definition of exist? If it doesn’t follow the definition, it’s not exist, it’s something else. False, I could have possibly been so disappointed my claim was so utterly destroyed that I may have saw suicide as a way to ease my suffering. That could have happened, according to the laws of the universe. Simply because it didn't happen doesn't mean it was impossible, only unlikely. Improbable does not equal impossible. You're a FOOL! Seriously, You would sacrifice your own life because you can’t take a rebuke in a debate? No intelligent person would do that! Get wisdom! Get sense! Get intelligence! And don’t die on me like a poor dumb fool! Debate is not worth it. 1 <---- Oh look, I see one right there That is a visual representation of a number expressed by Arabic numerals, not necessary the number itself. Numbers don’t exist, you don’t actually see them, but a symbolic representation of them. You only know the meaning of the symbol “1” because you were taught it, but if I showed you numbers from a foreign language (e.g. the Japanese 四, or Hebrew ת״ש) you may not understand them because you were not initially taught them.