BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Birdman is clearly inferior to Rob1billion

The only thing you have been preparing for your entire life is the beat-down of the century. Contention 5: Birdman has not the gaul to put his preferences on display, on the major issues, on his profile. Why is this? What is he hiding? Is he afraid of the impending challenges to his pride? If your pride is what you are defending, Birdman, then realize that you have little to be proud of anyway. Contention 6: Birdman wears stupid tennis headbands all the time, for NO REASON. If I had some pictures I would show them, but my camera is pretty nice and I didn't want to risk the structural integrity of the lens by focusing it on birdman's face. If you invite him to the bar, he will show up wearing this headband and embarass you. Who does he think he is? Contention 7: Birdman got totally punked at the bar 2 months ago, while trying to pick up a prostitute. As he sat there trying to make idle conversation with this girl, my friend Jared stepped in and inquired whether she wanted to talk to a real man or not. She said yes, which meant that Birdman was no longer on the guest list for her services. Birdman sat there for another 15 minutes or so while Jared stood between their respective barstools, suffering utter humiliation while crying into his beer all the while. When I came inside with the meat circus, and tried to introduce Birdman to the crowd, they showed genuine disinterest in him and would not even shake his hand without turning their heads in disapproval. They could smell fear and disingenuity in the air, and saw Birdman's tiny trembling frame in the corner, shaking with the squeamishness of a young insecure schoolgirl. Contention 8: When playing teams tennis (and losing as usual), Birdman yells his signature cry "FIGHT TO DUECE" to try and boost his teammate's morale. He still usually loses.
Birdman is clearly inferior to Rob1billion

How shall I proceed? My wet, sweaty palms and their nood-ly weak grip firmly accept this so-called challenge. But rather than shake your hand and bend over, I will fight for what I believe is right!! Who are you to haze and belittle? Screw the purpose of your debate. If embarrassment is desired, embarrassment you shall have! As far as intellect is concerned, I have no qualms debunking, disproving and circumventing every contention provided by this self proclaimed seasoned pro. In advance, I apologize to anybody following along. There will be moments where I will have to stoop to my opponents level. At times it will be vulgar and unpleasant, dirty and obscene. These are the consequences of a battle that must be won at all costs. I have come prepared. But is Rob prepared? Speaking of preparation, I must prepare my body for the world. I must wash the soil from my being, much like I am about to wash Rob's sad proclamations from everybody's memory. I must ready the ship for launch and set the table for dinner. Hey Rob, are those the only contentions hiding in your cheap bag of tricks? Is this all I have to look forward to? I'll spot you a round. Let you layer these arguments a lil' better. I will debunk these attacks on my school progress, tennis ability / basketball greatness, and guitar/ vocal abilities in due time. I feel no hurry or sense of urgency. I'm giddy like a schoolgirl. My metaphorical hymen is still intact, and I want to savor the moment. Prepare yourself Mr. ROB, because I have been preparing for this moment my entire life...
Birdman is clearly inferior to Rob1billion

The purpose of this debate is to haze this newcomer. I consider him my intellectual inferior, and will provide evidence to support this. Here is why I am better than Birdman: Contention 1: Birdman is is well-behind in his organic chemistry studies, and will most likely fail the class (or pass with a mediocre grade). This is because he is too busy eating sushi at Little Tokyo all the time and is not smart enough to realize he should be studying. I, on the other hand, take my classes somewhat seriously, most of the time. Contention 2: Birdman cannot beat me, most of the time, in tennis matches. The only reason he took me in 3 straight basketball games yesterday was because I clearly wasn't feeling well, and had a sore throat. Also, he showed up 45 minutes later than he said he would in an evil attempt to make me use the little energy I had before he got there. Contention 3: Birdman's guitar skills are sub-par. Can he even pull off a C-chord without having to squint his eyes at the instrument and fumble around with it for several seconds before sounding out the chord? I doubt it. Contention 4: listen to him sing: http://www.youtube.com... now listen to mine: http://www.youtube.com...
Canada is under a dictatorship, not a democracy!!!

What more can I say? As my stance has not been challenged with a rebuttal within the 2nd round, it would seem unnecessary to add to points which I have established with no argument to question its validity. At this point, I continue to be punctual, steadfast, and maintain my rapport with the voters to confirm my arguments successful validity over my opponents opinions. Thank you. Kingsley aka. the voice of the people!
Canada is under a dictatorship, not a democracy!!!

Canada is said to be under a democratic government elected by the people, with all power in the people. Is this legally true? Within the constitution it states in Section 3 Chapter 9, "The Executive Government and Authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen," which is referred to as Executive Power. In Section 3 Chapter 12 it states that all levels of government and those subject to it are under the sovereign power of the Queen of England, through her appointed representatives of her interests. Is this not a Dictatorship? Democracy can not be operating within a country in part or in only certain aspects of society and then classify it as a Democratic society. In the case of Canada, it is governed under the interests of one individual as having all power over it without limitation or restriction, by law.
All Americans are Irish on St Patricks day

While in the merry month of May, Now from me home I startedLeft, The girls of Tuam were nearly broken-heartedSaluted father dear, Kissed me darling motherDrank a pint of beer, Me grief and tears to smotherThen off to reap the corn and leave where I was bornCut a stout, Black thorn to banish ghosts and goblinsA brand-new pair of brogues to rattle over the bogsAnd frighten all the dogs on the rocky road to Dublin A-one, Two, Three, Four, FiveHunt the hare and turn her down the rocky roadAnd all the ways to Dublin, Whack, Follol de-dah In Mullingar that night I rested limbs so wearyStarted by daylight next morning blithe and earlyTook a drop of pure to keep me heart from shrinkingThats the Paddy's cure when'er he's on for drinkingTo hear the lassies smile, Laughing all the whileAt me curious style, 'twould set your heart a-bubblin'They asked me was I hired and wages I required to layWas almost tired of the rocky road to Dublin One, Two, Three, Four, FiveHunt the hare and turn her down the rocky roadAnd all the ways to Dublin, Whack, Follol de-dah In Dublin next arrived, I thought it such a pityTo be so soon deprived a view of that fine citySo then I took a stroll, All among the qualityBundle it was stolen, In a neat localitySomething crossed me mind, When I looked behindNo bundle could I find upon me stick a-wobblin''Quiring after the rogue, Said me Connaught brogueIt wasn't much in vogue on the rocky road to Dublin One, Two, Three four, FiveHunt the hare and turn her down the rocky roadAnd all the ways to Dublin, Whack, Follol de-dah From there I got away, Me spirits never fallingLanded on the quay, Just as the ship was sailingCaptain at me roared, Said that no room had heWhen I jumped aboard, A cabin found for PaddyDown among the pigs, Did some hearty rigsI played some hearty jigs, The water round me bubblingWhen off Holyhead I wished meself was deadOr better for instead on the rocky road to Dublin One, Two, Three four, FiveHunt the hare and turn her down the rocky roadAnd all the ways to Dublin, Whack, Follol de-dah The boys of Liverpool, When we safely landedCalled meself a fool, I could no longer stand itBlood began to boil, Temper I was losingPoor old Erin's Isle they began abusing"Hurrah me soul" says I, Me Shillelagh I let flyGalway boys were by and saw I was a hobblin'With a "lo! " and "hurray! " they joined in the affrayQuickly cleared the way for the rocky road to Dublin One, Two, Three four, FiveHunt the hare and turn her down the rocky roadAnd all the ways to Dublin, Whack, Follol de-dah
All Americans are Irish on St Patricks day

I agree with some of the things you are saying but there are some inconsistencies. A holiday beyond anyone's control doesn't make that person something that they are not. What about the case for people who don't celebrate St. Patricks day? I surely don't. According to Wikipedia: "St. Patricks Day" It is primarily celebrated as a recognition of Irish and Irish American culture; celebrations include prominent displays of the color green, Eating and drinking, Religious observances, And numerous parades. The holiday has been celebrated on the North American continent since the late 18th century. Black History Month is in February, Does that make everyone black during that time? No. Mexican Heritage Month is September 15th-October 15th, Does that make everyone Mexican during that time? No. I'm most certainly sure Cinco De Mayo is celebrated primarily celebrated by Mexicans/Latinos/Hispanics only. No one else really celebrates it much, It isn't a big holiday like Halloween or Christmas. Pumpkins are apart of Halloween and people usually carve them. Pumpkins also originated from Mexico, So does that mean on Halloween all Americans are Mexicans? No. | Source: hsgpurchasing(dot)com/Articles/pumpkin. Htm "Pumpkins are believed to have originated in North America. Seeds from related plants have been found in Mexico dating back to 7000 to 5500 B. C. "
All Americans are Irish on St Patricks day

The United States is a melting pot, Or at least it used to be, We come from so many cultures and assimilate, Pizza is now american, As are egg rolls and sushi corn bread and collard greens. We are a nation of cultural appropriation, We borrow, And steal the best aspects from the many cultures, That have landed here. . Chritmas trees are german, Cinco de mayo mexican, The god father and nothing is more american than the story the legend of the ged father or scar face, Leave the gun take the canolis. . . On St pATRICKS day we get drunk and celebrate our Irish catholic brothers and sisters and show them gratitude for green beer and leprchauns. . On st patricks we all become irish because we are all american no matter where we came from we are here now.
All Americans are Irish on St Patricks day

You ignored my questions in the comments, Which means this must be a troll debate and you probably are going to forfeit the rest of the rounds on here, But prove me wrong. I'm not going to make an argument yet because I don't want to waste my time because you might forfeit the debate. I will make this my acceptance round and see if you respond. Make your first argument in R2, Please explain how "All Americans are Irish on St Patricks day" if you do that, We will debate. If you forfeit, Then this debate is canceled.
All Americans are Irish on St Patricks day

As I was goin' overThe Cork and Kerry MountainsI saw Captain FarrellAnd his money, He was countin'I first produced my pistolAnd then produced my rapierI said, "Stand and deliver or the devil he may take ya" I took all of his moneyAnd it was a pretty pennyI took all of his money, Yeah, And I brought it home to MollyShe swore that she loved me, No, Never would she leave meBut the devil take that woman, Yeah, For you know she tricked me easy Musha rain dum a doo, Dum a daWhack for my daddy, OhWhack for my daddy, OhThere's whiskey in the jar, Oh Being drunk and wearyI went to Molly's chamberTakin' Molly with meBut I never knew the dangerFor about six or maybe seven, Yeah, In walked Captain FarrellI jumped up, Fired my pistolsAnd I shot him with both barrels Yeah, Musha rain dum a doo, Dum a da, Ha, YeahWhack for my daddy, OhWhack for my daddy, OhThere's whiskey in the jar, Oh Yeah, Whiskey, Yo, WhiskeyOh, Oh, YeahOh, Oh, Yeah Now some men like a fishin'But some men like the fowlin'Some men like to hear, To hear the cannonball roarin'Me, I like sleepin', 'Specially in my Molly's chamberBut here I am in prison, Here I am with a ball and chain, Yeah Musha rain dum a doo, Dum a da, Heh, HehWhack for my daddy, OhWhack for my daddy, OhThere's whiskey in the jar, Oh, YeahWhiskey in the jar, Oh Musha rain dum a doo, Dum a daMusha rain dum a doo, Dum a da, HeyMusha rain dum a doo, Dum a daMusha rain dum a doo, Dum a da, Yeah
Death penalty or not

Before I get started outlining my argument (since Swagjake has only barely started with his own, I will do the same), I'd like to clarify the debate, since i do think it's unclear from the information given. What are we talking about? We're discussing the death penalty, and likely focusing on the United States in its usage. This is a policy of capital punishment, or "a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. " As such, we're discussing its presence or absence in the policy of this country. As such, the burden is shared - it is Con's burden to support the death penalty and explain its benefits, and it is my duty to present reasons for it to end. . http://en.wikipedia.org... The topic says "Death penalty or not", though Con's position in this debate is obviously one of being Pro on death penalty. I'm not quite sure why there's a question mark at the end of that statement, but it seems to me that he thinks that life imprisonment is essentially like living rent free at a resort. I would contend that that's not anywhere near the reality, though I would rather he explained that argument (and, preferably, sourced it) before I rebut it. My argument will come down to 3 basic points, each of which will then be expanded upon in subpoints. The death penalty is wrong for justice. - Classism and racism in convictions and trials - Innocence and wrongful conviction The death penalty does more harm than good to society at large. - The value of rehabilitation - Court clog and cost The death penalty is inherently immoral. - Cruel and unusual punishment - The immorality of vengeance I leave it to my opponent to initiate this debate more completely.
The Wall of Separation between Church and State is not Constitutional

"There is a Constitutional difference between a State Government and a federal government. " - Not really, Both are a form of government. The only reason the state government exists is to give each state representation. - Plus the constitution implies that Neither government can pass laws which aid one religion, Aid all religions, Or prefer one religion over another. Endorsing a religion by government employees praying in a government run building, Is an endorsement of a religion, Which therefore is the government preferring one religion over another, Which is unconstitutional. - Moreover, The states/ the government establishing a religion in their state, Is aiding and endorsing one religion over another, Which is unconstitutional.
The Wall of Separation between Church and State is not Constitutional

" If you are right then why did Jefferson go to Christian services that were held in the House of Representatives, Why has there been prayers led in Congress by mostly Christian denominations for over 200 years, Why did the Federal Government support Christian schools and colleges monetarily for many years if the Founders were against it, And why did Virginia and Massachusetts keep established religions well into the early 1800s? " - Than according to the constitution, Jefferson and the founders were hypocrites. What is the difference between the government establishing a religion? Or all of the government endorsing a religion? Either way the government is putting one religion above another which is unconstitutional. " They wanted to protect the religion of minorities and wanted to avoid intolerance and threat to religious liberty that might come from a nationally established church. " - What is even the difference between a nationally established religion, Or a state established religion? The only real difference is each state gets to choose. However it is still the government establishing a religion either way. " Religion flourishes in greater purity, Without than with the aid of government. " - The states are STILL the government.
The Wall of Separation between Church and State is not Constitutional

If you are right then why did Jefferson go to Christian services that were held in the House of Representatives, Why has there been prayers led in Congress by mostly Christian denominations for over 200 years, Why did the Federal Government support Christian schools and colleges monetarily for many years if the Founders were against it, And why did Virginia and Massachusetts keep established religions well into the early 1800s? Actually the Founders believed that religious faith was important in our system of government. They wanted to protect the religion of minorities and wanted to avoid intolerance and threat to religious liberty that might come from a nationally established church. Indeed, Many ff the men who founded America came to escape religious persecution and their goal in drafting the Bill of Rights was to protect people's rights to practice their religion free from government interference and with no federal favoritism to a particular creed. Therefore the government was prohibited from establishing a religion. What does establish mean, Then? The left would say the putting up a nativity scene in a public square is establishing a religion. But the Founders had something else in mind: The Church of England. They did not want a formal union of the political and ecclesiastical authority in the hands of the state. Again, This was to prevent a national religion or church, But states still had established religions. So what did the Founders' believe was the intent of the Bill of Rights? According to Madison, The Father of the Constitution, He 'apprehended the meaning of the words to be, That Congress should not establish a religion, And enforce the legal observation of it by aw, Nor compel men to worship God in any manner contrary to their conscience. ' Neither Madison nor Jefferson were hostile to religion. It was widely believed at the nation's founding that faith was necessary predicate for liberty. As Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence that our rights come from God. Jefferson wrote that without faith, Liberty was vulnerable: 'And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, A conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not violated but with Hiss wrath? ' Madison wrote that belief in God was 'essential to the moral order of the world. ' Opposition to an established church is not opposition to religion in general. In fact Madison noted how avoiding the establishment of one religion had actually helped religion in general. ' Religion flourishes in greater purity, Without than with the aid of government. ' Jefferson's treaty with the Kaskaskian Indians provided annual cash to a Catholic priests and a church. They continued until 1897 to provide money to sectarian schools when they decided that the $500, 000 was a lot.
The Wall of Separation between Church and State is not Constitutional

" The Founding Fathers' intention in the 1st Amendment was to make clear that Congress could not establish a national religion, " - This is partially true, However, Congress also meant that the government would not endorse a certain religion over another religion. Having a bunch of government representatives pray in a government building is indeed endorsing a certain religion, Which is unconstitutional. Jefferson even stated, "I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, Their doctrines, Discipline, Or exercises. " " but not that they couldn't practice their beliefs in the government for that would violate the free exercise of their religion. " - Last time I checked, The government officials are allowed to practice their own religion, But not in government buildings or in public space. Doing so would be endorsing a religion. " The States had the right to have established religions, " Not necessarily, The constitution also states that "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, Liberty, Or property, Without due process of law;" From this, We can infer that the states should not have the rights to establish religions as that would be depriving someone of their freedom of choice.
The Wall of Separation between Church and State is not Constitutional

The framers of the Constitution only meant that Congress will not make a national religion. However, The US government supported monetarily many religious schools in America until it decided that it was too much money. Thomas Jefferson who wrote the quote of the wall of separation attended services held in the House of Representatives even after writing the letter of the wall. The Founding Fathers' intention in the 1st Amendment was to make clear that Congress could not establish a national religion, But not that they couldn't practice their beliefs in the government for that would violate their free exercise of their religion. Indeed, For several decades after the Constitution, Many states had established religions. Therefore the intent was clear. The States had the right to have established religions, Like Virginia and Massachusetts, But Congress could not establish a national religion as was the case of Catholicism in France, Spain and Italy or England with the Anglicans or Germany with the Lutherans or the Middle East with Islam, In other words government enforced religious establishment.
God is an atheist.

According to my understanding of Christianity they believe that nothing created or controls God. Also they believe that God is omniscient and would therefore know that no one created or controls him. Therefore he would not believe in a creating or controlling force. And religion is defined as the belief and worship of a supernatural controlling power. And since God doesn't believe in a controlling power he has no religion. And one without religion is an atheist that means God is an atheist.
God is an atheist.

Still, the Britannica link you gave states "atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings." http://www.britannica.com...I bolded the keywords. It's not just about denying metaphysical beliefs but "metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings"Even if God is incapable of believing in the metaphysical (I'm not saying I agree with this by the way), that doesn't fit the definition of atheist because an atheist has to deny the very existence as well. It's not enough to disbelieve in metaphysical beliefs. An atheist has to disbelieve existence as well.
God is an atheist.

I suppose what it comes down to is what you consider as the definition of atheism. Using that definition would indicate that God is not an atheist. But if we look at other definitions like this one http://www.britannica.com... which defines atheism as the denial of metaphysical beliefs. Metaphysical being of or relating to the transcendent or to a reality beyond what is perceptible to the senses http://i.word.com... (The mobile Merriam Webster site) this definition would make God considered an atheist. As nothing would be beyond what is perceptible to God therefore making him incapable of believing in the metaphysical. And also I would like to add that Buddhism would not be considered atheist by any definition. As Buddhism does not deny the existence of God. Buddhism is an agnostic religion. But I will grant that by the Oxford definition you supplied there are atheistic religions.