Can Anarcho-Capitalism work

What do we think of when we think of the word anarchy? fear , terror , chaos? but why is this ? most people are not educated about what anarchy really is and how it would work most people do not belive that we can exist without a government they think the idea is absurd. Many people also belive that a society without a government would fall into haos because there would be no law and no order but is that really true? if we look at what Anarcho-Capitalists want it's complete different from what other people think they want , An Anarchist society would be based on the non-agression principle 'The non-aggression principle (NAP)"also called the non-aggression axiom, the zero aggression principle (ZAP), the anti-coercion principle, or the non-initiation of force"is a moral stance which asserts that aggression is inherently illegitimate. NAP and property rights are closely linked, since what aggression is depends on what a person's rights are.[1] Aggression, for the purposes of NAP, is defined as the initiation or threatening of violence against a person or legitimately owned property of another. Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that physically affect an individual"s property or person, no matter if the result of those actions is damaging, beneficial, or neutral to the owner, are considered violent or aggressive when they are against the owner's free will and interfere with his right to self-determination and the principle of self-ownership.' each person would buy protection there would be many protection agencies some of which would be local and some of which would be across the country the individual person can decide which one to pay into every month and than if a crime is commited that the person is affected by he can call the protection agency and demand an investigation to occur. Another problem many people have with Anarchy is the lack of regulation or actually the lack of regulations that are forced onto the company by the government . In a free Anarchist society regulations would exist and in fact companies would pay for regulations and i'm going to explain why . One way to check if a product is safe is to make a government agency do it they will decide if to allow or forbid the sale of the product , many products are regulated like that but another good approach is too let competing private firms asses the product and give a rating customers than can decide to buy or not to buy a product based on its rating , a private company would hire a certification firm so that they can evaluate their product and if their product gets a good rating or passes than the certifirers logo is added to it . Manufuctures would pay such a firm because it increases sales customers who see the logo see that the product has been through safety tests so as a result they are more likely to buy the product the shop owner also would not allow products that don't have a high rating or are dangerous to be sold in his/her shop because if they did they could loose costumers so they would pay extra to stock certified products . Competing firms work good because their goal is to be cautious but also fast , a certifier who turns out to have certified a dangerous product looses their reputation therefore increasing the chance of the manufucturer to hire a different certifier on the other hand a certifier that takes too long will also loose customers . Now compare this to a government agency that if allowed a dangerous product on the market would suffer huge consequences for the officials running it therefore such a government agency has a goal to be over cautious they are take very long and take too many tests that can be expensive they do delay products from arriving to the market if such a product is a life saving drug people die that could have been saved . ,