That there is more that unites us than divides us

I would firstly like to argue some points provided by my opponent. Then present the remainder of my case (although as I have technically violated my own terms I will keep it concise) As I stated previously, "In the past, society was rejecting of diversity and conformity reigned, however today we have a different set of values", my opponent has refuted this claiming that this cannot be a generalised term for society, considering the differences in culture between ourselves and others. I would like to rebut this by saying that yes, values are an intricate belief system, but, for the vast majority, acceptance, charity, inclusion and tolerance has been added (or was already apparent) to these values of ours. This is a common feature of society today, as we can see that in most instances, without violence, international or interracial issues can be sorted out. This is attributed partly to the fact that our world has grown up, and mostly because we are accepting cultural differences. Confrontation exists, and is prominent in resolution, touchï¿½ , however this does not prove that we are influenced to be more divided. In actual fact, it suggests the opposite, that we respect each other enough to speak rationally to each other. "structured social classes and statuses are now extinct in society". The purpose of this statement was, to show how a generalised assumption about someone according to an obvious, advertised status is not happening today. If anyone looked at any random on the street, they would not be able to tell personal information about them. Their income, marital status, political views or occupation would be a secret. My opponent has claimed that "If we gave all power to the lower socioeconomic class we would be in crisis" This is not only derogatory but also a stereotype. Judgements like these hurt others. The reason why we are "divided" into tax categories is not to be placed into figurative boxes but to be dealt with on a more personal and customised level. Besides, they are not dividing us of judging us, but in fact tailoring their services to be fairer. "If there was no social class, oppression would not exist" Oppression is not simply, or directly the result of social classes. The parenting, or supposed lack of, is also not a major or direct cause of a lack of respect in generation Y, and it doesn't end with respect. Yes I agree that gen Y has less respect than older generations, however, Generation Y is probably the most accepting, trusting, and globally aware generation ever. I believe that more than compensates for a manners issue. The evolution of technology has created globalization, which makes our planet figuratively smaller. figuratively smaller, in regards to communications technology. Anyone could, with the click of a mouse, via skype, talk to a relative or a friend overseas as if they are in the next room. Driving us apart, or bringing us closer?cars and roads have more benefits then detriments in a logistical sense because we are able to travel quicker, further and more comfortably to any place roads can take us. Once again, excuse the pun, we are being driven closer rather than being torn apart. 2. The Death of the Stereotype. - Assumptions are less common. - It's ok to be an individual in today's society. - Labels (Nerds, Jocks, Plastics etc...) don't apply in today's schools. - Hierarchy, That's ancient, medieval stuff. 3. Leaders and Conformity - Obama, moved on from racism. - Julia Gillard, moved on from sexism. - Democracy not Communism. - Propaganda This has been a good debate, I am thankful for the challenge and opportunity. Good luck for the final round.