Humans would survive the typical ( slow zombie ) zombie apocalypse.

1. In the event that only 1 man and woman were left to reproduce you are correct in saying that there would be incest. However ( going on the Adam and Eve again ) that would have been how it happened to start with anyway. Is it disgusting, yes! But if it was necessary for the species survival im sure it would be done. 2. Doomsday Bunkers. Protocol states that the nation's head of state, his or her family and a select group of guards and officials are the only ones allowed inside. In the US, the secret service would never allow anybody to enter the bunker without being one of those people. In North Korea, I highly doubt that Kim Jong Un would risk his own safety to allow any of his citizens safe harbour. Refugees would likely be headed into less secure, military protected bunkers. Many of those would be infected. Others may not be. The doomsday bunkers however would remain secure.3. North Korea. The North has an arsenal of aproximatly 20 nuclear weapons that have been confirmed by international sources. There may be more we don't know about. By the time the apocalypse reaches such a point that the north is firing nukes at ( what used to be ) China then I'm sure the US would have bigger concerns. America would likely not care ( as most of if not all of, the population in the nuclear targets would be dead ) and would be to busy within there own borders. 4. Walls I still believe that in the early outbreak stages ( while the infection is major in only certain parts of the world ) that some cities would take precautions and would be walled off before the apocalypse began to directly effect them. These walled off cities would likely be few in number but they would probably maintain sizable populations and would be heavily policed. Populations in these cities would number in the thousands ( potentially millions in the case of cities like LA, Shanghai, Berlin, Tehran or other massive population centers ). This would be enough survivors for us to live on. 5. Decompossure It is a natural occurrence. While yes, Typical zombies decompose at a far slower rate then humans they still decompose. Everyone decomposes once their blood stops flowing properly. This is a law of nature. It does not matter if it takes ( the typical ) few years before a zombie decomposes fully because it will still decompose. That means that 3 or 4 years after it all began it would be over. Only a few stragglers would remain ( zombies I mean ) because there would have been some idiots who were infected late. The walled off cities and the doomsday bunker survivors ( and any other bunker groups, survivor groups or island groups ) would be left alive and free to head put for supply gathering. Humanity would be bumped down significantly in population, technology, and even land but we would live on. 6. IslandsVery few people even know that some of these island micronations exist. Refugees would flood towards Iceland, new Zealand and other better known islands. Locations with populations of only 20 or so people wouldnt even be affected. Many of these are primitive and live off of their own crops and wildlife with little to no outside support or contact. This means more survivors that could keep us going a few years after the outbreak.7. Patient ZeroAs I stated in my first round establishment of the typical zombie apocalypse, it all starts with one zombie ( how patient zero came to be infected is something you can be imaginative about. ). I also established the typical bite only infection rule. It is not typical for everyone to be infected in such a way that they turn after death. If that were typical it wouldnot have shocked Walking Dead fans as much as it did. Givin that there must be a patient zero start point Police and Local Militia operations remain in play as a potential means to survive.8. IdiotsHere I actually agree with my opponent. There are alot of idiots in the world. Luckily for us though idiots tend to be the first to die due to the fact that they are, well, idiots! If someone is stupid enough to try a catch a zombie they are probably stupid enough to get bit trying. There probably won't be enough of the foolish people left that they could ruin our survival odds. My apologies for the frequent use of the word idiot however I wished to use the same wording as my opponent to keep everything consistent.9. The Military. Bases require an active national defence ready team. These soldiers are on base with these aircraft, tanks and weapons 24 hours a day. They would act as immediate military response. Many city have an airbase within a proximity that allows for air force response in 10-20 minutes. 10. Simple fact. It is nearly impossible to eliminate an entire species ( aspecialy a plant wide, technological advanced, adaptive, intelligent one ). The dinosaurs didn't all die in a day. Infact many species survived the prehistoric extinction events. Those were planetary, inascapable, events far more powerful than a few nuclear bombs. The survivors were mammals, fish, birds and other dim witted animals. Imagine how much better we could have done. A zombie apocalypse is no contest to the prehistoric extinction events. If some animals could survive the poisonus air, dark ash filled skies and lack of most plant life we can definitely survive some rotting corpses with pea sized brains. People of debate. orgI urge you to stand with your species and it's ability to live on. We are strong, smart and a force to be reckoned with. Zombies are slow, dumb, physically fragile, and purely instinctive creatures. Their only advantage is that you have to hit them in the head to kill them. We beat them any day of the week. There would be survivors and those survivors would rebuild. I would like to thank my opponent for a great and respectful debate. This proved a good experience and it is my belief that both sides had valid arguments. Thank you all for taking the time to read this and vote.