The U.S having a 2 political party system

"Politics is designed to be slow because the system created by the founding fathers made a government that would not be so responsive to change but would still work at a reasonable pace to create laws that abide by the parameters within the Constitution". What is the pace pro? The two parties will figure out something tomorrow. And then tomorrow. And then tomorrow. And then tomorrow. I guess that pace is working Pro. The two parties 40-50 years ago overlapped regarding congress and now they are only flapping with the left wing and the right wing of a bald eagle. Over 120 million Americans are in absolute gridlock. The imperfections in this country are obvious pro. John Locke was a father to some of the founding fathers. "Government being for the preservation of every man's right and property, by preserving him from the violence or injury of others, is for the good of the governed". (First Treatise, Chapter 9). "And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving themselves from the attempts and designs of anybody, even of their legislators, whenever they shall be so foolish, or so wicked, as to lay and carry on designs against the liberties and properties of the subject". (Second Treatise, Chapter 13). "But if a long train of abuses, prevarications and artifices, all tending the same way, make the design visible to the people, and they cannot but feel, what they lie under, and whither they are going, 'tis not to be wondered, that they should then rouse themselves, and endeavor to put the rule into such hands, which may secure to them the ends for which government was at first enacted". (Second Treatise, Chapter 19). "But though men when they enter into society, give up the equality, liberty and executive power they had in the state of nature, into the hands of the society, to be so far disposed of by the legislature, as the good of the society shall require; yet it being only with an intention to everyone the better to preserve himself his liberty and property"" (Second Treatise, Chapter 9 The Patriot act. That idea totally rips apart constitutional liberties. The commerce clause. Laws are passed every day arbitrarily without the consent of the consented to be governed. Democracy is supposed to be an active event for all citizens. Another problem is that many people do not participate. "Sprite, 7 Up, Sierra Mist, Dr Pepper, Fanta" Regarding my analogy. All of these are products of Coke, and Pepsi pro, but it is irrelevant. "Adding a third party into such a scenario would be like adding another internet retard into an internet argument going on between two other internet retards. Now we have three internet retards arguing over something and even if one party wins it doesnt matter because that party is still retarded so to speak....." So by your own words so to speak is that the Republicans represent one "retard", the Democrats another "retard", and X party represents another "retard", Exactly but to be more friendly the two party system is not capable of functioning, it is "retarded" … because of your advice given regarding votes in a previous round, I would like to give advice of stating the word "retarded" online…I guess your against disabled folks or pro in calling others "retards"… droping the r bomb, that is for another debate…Life essentially is a decaying process beginning in the womb till the clock ends, everyone will inherit one form of disability or another if they hang around on earth… The tax reform in 86 there was a functional system going on. They fought to balance each other out and now they sit idle or at some mysterious pace. In social mobility going up we are behind France and that is a country to note definitively in government compared to our system. The parties do not represent the country as a whole. The Republicans are representing a small view. The Democrats represent the same tiny lens to look out of. Vast numbers of views are not represented. There is about 39 percent of independent voter's registered. That points that the two party system is working in "retard" villa located in North America from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Frankly this debate was never for me to establish any new form of government ( as I did mention bringing in another party of some sort or demolish the one at hand) but to state that this system is not functional and there must be a more functional system out there for our generation to seize but con is representing how this two party system is not working and attempted to work something of value out. Frankly what is wrong with another party or two more and these parties do not necessarily have to be a small radical party but can be a new party called the generation X party or a radical one or a moderate one, or the real change movement party that is blossoming across the U.S. (the tea party, Obama's real implication of change), change cannot happen because he is stuck looking through the democratic. Allow for more conflict. Politics it seems is the only system that an individual has to pick their party for their vote to count on one side or on the other side. That does not seem like freedom does it? If it is freedom explain. Call it a harangue against who knows. That is not hesitant comment to make but pinpoint because who knows what needs to happen in the political sphere regarding the incarcerated marriage of the dysfunctional two party system that is not working. I am not able to establish a new government by any means but only to advocate this idea. I am a nobody that lives in N.J. but if enough nobody's get together there can be a somebody. The conditions citizens are facing today can the two party system fix it? Unemployment, housing markets, the economy, and so forth. It all happened under the two party system is the two party system capable of fixing the mess. Are they still capable of righteously employing their politics in harmony to help the average citizen effected by the mess. The two party system currently is not providing stability if it is vote pro. During the years of 1981 and 1990 the two parties worked wonderful together even with conflict. The tradition of moderate Americans having a voice in politics is gone. Where is it in society? Each party has been constantly at each other's throats so the other looks worse producing nil of political thought. There is FOX there is MSNBC. The views people get through the media establish this pre-modern views of looking at each subject at hand. Conclusion: The Two party system in the U.S. needs to be dusted off and is not working. Real change and a real blue print needs to be developed not just for now but for future generations to retain. Is the U.S. destined to be like Rome? Rome after all spanned for centuries and was lost to history, the U.S.'s economy is going down the tubes. Freedom is not found in the Two Party System.