God has commited most of the 7 deadly sins: Part 2

Thanks to pro for his argument. As far as why I do not think there are things such as "deadly sins." If someone is classifying deadly sins as simply a sin that can lead to more sin then I would agree with that, but if someone says there are 7 deadly sins that can keep you out of heaven I do not agree with that. For the simply explanation of that's not a biblical teaching. But again its irrelevant to this debate. My opponent said that the link I used that showed God cannot sin is not reliable. http://www.gotquestions.org... http://www.toughquestionsanswered.org... http://www.revelife.com... http://www.gotquestions.org... Maybe he will accept at least one of these. The teaching that God cannot sin is biblical. Pro said, "my [sic] oponent chose a sentence or two from each sin and barely attacked each of them." Due to the 8,000 character limit I am unable to point out every thing that is wrong in each of your arguments. That is why I can only pull out a few sentences of each argument and show they are fallacious. I also think it's funny you bring this up because that is exactly what you did with my arguments as well. Sloth: "He DOES answer our prayers, but in a way that will require a limited amount of work, as in just letting them die, therefore showing sloth." As a reminder, for this debate we are clearly assuming the Christian God exist and we must also be accepting the bible as true. If God is all powerful and can create the universe ex nihilo, I do not think it is any harder for him to answer a prayer by letting them live rather than them dying. It is absurd to think that the reason people die of cancer or anything else for that reason is because God does not want to do any work. Furthermore I would argue that if God just let everyone live forever on earth that it would be horrible for the human race. The death rate is 100%. Everyone dies, and this is not because God is "too lazy" to keep them alive. Greed: "Therefore, If God wasn't regarded, he would have no power, like the person in government. So he is greedy and needs worship, or his power is gone." Again, I do not think this is true because with your doughnut argument, if the doughnut wanted to get back our attention the doughnut could not do anything about it. God on the other hand, since his power is not gone as you claim it is, he could always get our attention again because he is still all powerful even if humans do not think he is. I also would like to point out that I think that the worship is not to help God. God does not need our worship. God does not need anything from us. The worship is more for our benefit. When we worship God we are in communion with him and if we have a relationship with him then we will go to heaven. I would argue that Christians need to worship God much more than God needs Christian to worship God. Envy: "So, my says with Holy Jealousy, that basically God is possessive of Worship, which belongs to him. Not anyone else. If he thinks that, then isn't that envious?" In a word, no. Worship does belong to him. He is not jealous of what is someone else's which is what envy is. Pride: "My opponents claim on not wanting to get to heaven isn't backed up by anything, so It remains false until proves otherwise, because of my argument. And that's all he had, so the rest of my argument is still strong." If they really wanted to build a tower to reach heaven, it is unlikely they would start on the plain of Shinar, which is about Sea Level. Common sense says they would start on one of the a nearby mountains. Ready any bible commentary, the thought that these people thought they could actually get to heaven is ludicrous. Gluttony: "because he as an indulgence for our prayers and worship. Without those, he would be powerless." "I already showed this true. Bam." God would still have power without our prayers and worship. So no, you did not show this to be true. Vanity/Wrath: "Killing and murdering are both forms of vanity/wrath, and are both wrong. Unless my oponent proves there is justified killing, I am right. And by the way, my oponent will probably argue about the "death sentence", but it was organized by the government, and since the government doesn't [sic] particually [sic] fallow God's every will, they are not compatible." You are right when you say that the government does not follow God's every will you are correct, but the bible is not directly opposed to the death penalty. Also, you still have yet to show that if people rebel against God, he is unjustified in killing them. "EXACTLY!!!! He killed everyone except a devoted God-fallowing family and all the animals, which completely ties along with my first argument on envy's point, which he has yet to rebutle, and by saying this, he has agreed with my argument completely." First off, killing people for not worshiping him has nothing to do with envy, it would be greed if anything. However, I think again we have to look at it from the perspective of did God do this for him or did he do it for us? I would very much argue that the flood was a good thing. It would have wiped out a lot of non-believers and since there is less non-believers there is a better chance that the next generations of people would have been believers and gone to heaven. Therefore, I do not think the flood was an act of vanity/wrath but rather an act of love for you and me. "As for Adam and Eve, they didn't know any better." I did not mean to personally attack you. All I was saying was that the argument you presented was clearly contrary to what was written in the bible. I am sorry if it seemed like I directed it towards you personally. As for this point you are trying to make that they didn't know any better, that is completely false. "And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, "Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die." Genesis 2 "Satan convinced them to do it, because God didn't tell them what would happen if you did eat from it." Argument negated above. Pro has not been able to show that God legitimately has committed any of the 7 sins. Thank you for your time.