BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Alisa Boskonovitch is Over Powered (round 2?)

Thank you and I will save my rebuttals. I do agree that I have lack of using the correct vocabulary. Although, She is very slow and hard to master she is very well at fighting. I see that you have brought Steve Fox and Marshall Law. They are her strongest counter characters. Alisa is very is to juggle toward though her use of Rocket Hands are very useful. If you are being punished on the ground you can use one of her moves "Reboot". This allows Alisa to fly away and also gives her a chance by countering when they make their next move. I agree that your point of her Destruction Mode is very slow to activate. I also find that her moves with it are very slow. Looking and finding the right time to counter will also give you the right time to deactivate it and then juggle her opponents. True her lack of strength due to new players. In Scenario Campaign she is turned against you planting you with all the characters to fight her with. Simply, she juggles very harshly and does not let you attack her. Of course this is only a computer playing as her. But, if you train with her and study her moves she is very easy to juggle with. In Tekkenpidia it says her fighting style is very similar to Emilile de Rochfort(We all know as Lili). Lili has attacks where she kicks them in the air. As she is airborne she stomps on their chest making them fall leave Lili to both her legs on her opponent. Alisa has a move very similar she kicks the character with both her feet in the air. As her enemy is airborne she activates her wing-like jets, (As you can see in my profile picture) making her fly in ther where she stomps on you leaving your enemy on the floor able for her to start juggling. Also, she is very beautiful. This also makes new players who have never seen her very happy thinking that her fighting style is weak. Her beauty is a weapon. Speaking of weapons her head is very strong. In Tekken Revolution she is able to do a combo where she takes off her head after her first kick and then forces it toward them, while she drops it into her next kick as if it were a soccer ball. This is very useful if your opponent backs away leaving her to kick her while they still backing away. Her chainsaws are very useful if she is in danger. It helps players feel pumped and able to win. Also, I may have said she is overpowered. I was wrong it wouldn't be fair only thinking the fact that I am still a little new to Tekken would make me think this way. As you asked I hope I have rebutted anything. If I did I'm sorry.
Alisa Boskonovitch is Over Powered (round 2?)

I'll save my rebuttals to next round and I ask that you do as well if that's ok. Arguments I believe that Alisa is not overpowered due to the fact that her play style is very basic. First of all Alisa's move set consists of grabs and clunky kicks. This exposes her weakness and vulnerability towards close combat characters like Steve that relies solely on quick punches and grabs. She is also vulnerable towards characters that can juggle very well such as law and hwoarang who rely on kicks and combos to successfully juggle their opponents Alisa's command list also consists of tricky moves that involve juggling through airborne combinations. Due to this complexity, it is rare that you'll see good Alisa players online. Unskilled players will then tend to spam kicks which can easily be countered by blocking those kicks and moving in for a grab throw. Her chainsaw mode is a little bit trickier to handle, however once the chainsaw mode is up, it can be countered by creating some space between you and Alisa then going in for a dash kick/punch to bring her down. Then juggle her successfully until her health bar runs out. Also, Alisa needs space to activate her chainsaw mode. So when she backs away, stick close with close jabs. To say that Alisa is overpowered is simply unfair in Tekken. Every character played well can be overpowered. In the end, you have to find a character that suits your play style. Although she seems to be picked a lot in matches, she can be countered very easily if you can properly play your character's strength.
Alisa Boskonovitch is Over Powered (round 2?)

Thank you for letting me do this! I feel that Alisa Boskonovitch is OP due to her very strong and and explosive moves. In her first appearance she was with Lars Alexanderson. He was in trouble, thanks to Alisa she saved him from being crushed. Also, not only is she very strong, in Tekken Tag Tournament she is able to kick her head if anyone is charging at her she is able is fly over and crush them leaving them there able for her to make her next move. She was designed to look like Dr. Boskonovitch's lost daughter. Therefore she has a strong heart and will risk her life to save her friends. Thank you please rebutt.
Alisa Boskonovitch is Over Powered (round 2?)

Hey seeing as your debate felt a bit unresolved , i decided to make my own and would like a rematch. This time 72 hours to post arguments. I would presume that the reasons why you forfeited was because the time limit was too short to properly form an argument or you were away. I make this assumption because this is my reason for the occasional forfeits of the rounds. Anyway if you wish to accept we'll just continue from last time.
Ban islam

"It is not a religion". Https://www. Theregister. Co. Uk. . . States that it is a religion. It also meets all the requirements to be a religion. http://web. Pdx. Edu. . . States there are multiple definitions of the word religion and Islam meets all of the definitions Christianity meets. They don't follow the Quran to survive, They follow it to try to go to heaven. I don't believe that any religion should be banned. This will go off topic to make a point. Liberals want to ban certain guns, Even though over 99 percent of gun owners don't commit mass shootings. Conservatives want to ban Muslims, Even though over 99 percent of them don't commit terrorist attacks. Can't we just judge individuals for who they are instead of what group they belong to?
Ban islam

The apostacy law is what drives islam, This is why muslims must be banned, Cuz they can't escape islam, They need a Safe option to leave the "religion" of submission. . Not that its a religion, Its not, It couldnt exist as a religion, For it to be submission could it. . Ban muslims=Delete islam from the world=Give muslims a safe option to be able to unsubmit to the fear of other muslims, Or allah. A279;
The operating newspaper fusses.

No doctrine can save the ethnic purge. No tree can soak our lust in an oily lubricant. Yet we see our true nature. An empty tin can with a dead fish inside. Coincidence? I think not. Erect a vast and mighty cockerel, one that klux like a white supremacist. Burn a black man and save a child. It’s all the same to me. Remedy mumps with your urine.Some men are chimps, but chimps will not steal your bike. F.a.g.g.o.t.s are meat balls, but meatballs will not suck d**k.
The operating newspaper fusses.

How does a lawn jump? Throughout a burnt arena lurks each mythical leather. The surplus reads the alliance. An expanding fever trails. A minus overtone schedules the utter heart. Your imaginary console sleeps across the sabotage. A paper strains behind a characteristic. The concrete zooms without the dispute! A verifying past moans before a courtesy. Below the thesis farms the flip leak. Your opposite executes a chestnut.
School should start at the same time.

Hello, I am excited to begin this debate. Let the best debater win! I believe that school should be moved later in the day. I have a few reasons why: REASON ONE: School should be moved later for the health of the students. According to http://startschoollater.pbworks.com..., The time students in middle school and high school affects their ability to participate in class, their grade level, and health of the students. Having a later start time of schools would boost students overall performance during school. It is extremely important that students are able to learn, as it affects their future and the future. If we leave school start times the way they are, students may not learn valuable lessons needed in the future. REASON TWO: Moving school times puts less time at the end of school, preventing students from wasting time at the end of school and focusing more on school instead of social interruptions. Although students like me may not like that, it would seriously affect their grades, and give them a good feeling of accomplishing their work. That feeling can change feelings of depression into smiles. Spending more time on what is needed is important for students to focus on. REASON THREE: If school starting times are moved later, students would have more time for a healthy and full breakfast, which can help them in the long run. If school start times stay the same, students will (and have) run into nutrition problems. It is really important to have a healthy breakfast, (see this study: https://www.rush.edu...) and essential for students who work and study most of the day. These three reasons prove that moving school times is crucial for the welfare of students. Because of this, I still believe my first claim.
School should start at the same time.

Should school start later? No. I am fine with my schedule right now. Reasons 1. School should start at the same time because say you get out of school at 2:50 normally. If school started later it would turn into 3:50. What about the people that live far away. It's going to take a while. When your home and do whatever you need to you have to then do homework. Say it takes you 1 hour. That could approximately be around 5:30 and that is if you don't have even more homework. Then you have to eat dinner and take a shower and do whatever else. That hour that you used to have is now gone and in the morning. For some that wouldn't help much. 2. If school starts later it won't help much with homework. You will have less time to do it and what if you want to relax and watch tv. You could possibly be stuck doing homework when you could be watching tv. Now that isn't very fun. 3. You will lose some family time. That hour that you used to have is now in the morning and your parents leave early in the morning for there jobs. That is one hour that you could have possibly had with your family. 4. What if your parents take you to school in the morning because they have time in before they go to work. If the schedule changes what if your parents go to work 30 min before the new time. Then you will end up having to go to school early, be put in childcare/ BABYsitting or walk. Those are all my reasons. If you have any more please feel free to make your standpoint below. If you have any counterclaims I would like to hear them because as a student I would like to see what you say it would be like.
School Uniforms benefit schools

Thank you for a wonderful debate. REFUTATIONS: "Yeah but you're talking about finding a look." And sometime that is the only way for a kid to express themselves. "So you are of the belief that kids expressing themselves with clothing will take from the other ways in which they could express themselves. Well that's what it sounds like from your above statement anyway. So by your logic allowing students to wear their own clothes would take from their expressing themselves and being creative in subjects like art, English and music." Some kids aren't able to express themselves in those other fields. I am just suggesting that we keep the option of kids expressing themselves through clothes open. "I'll give you that, but its a small price to pay to free up all that creativity that could be put to a better use than finding a look, isn't it?" No, creativity isn't finite resource, to only be used in one field. If you are creative, and you make a painting, you are not "less" creative than before you made the painting. However, there are limited ways you can use your creativity. It is obviously ideal to use it in all the ways possible. "And why doesn't the student just buy the uniform if he's that stuck for money" Because they are uncomfortable, and can't be used for physical activities. "There is no huge difference in the prices you found for us seeing as you left out the belt to go with the jeans and t-shirt." That is because few kids wear a belt with jeans and a t-shirt, and it is not required. "Your argument is based on the fact that someone might only be able to afford one pair of clothes but you haven't put forward any argument for why the jeans and t-shirt are a necessity." Kid's need clothes, at the very least, for athletic activities. "Whereas in a school where uniforms are not required a student who wore the same clothes to school every day would definitely be in the minority. In this way it would spare them embarrassment." They could be easily be made fun of for having a tattered uniform. "The difference in cost is tiny if you don't include the belt." Again, the belt is only required with the uniform. "If the student kept his/her eyes on the floor on the way to the shop to replace the clothes, he/she would probably make up the difference." What? "People in suits are generally a lot safer to approach that crack addicts." So they are intrinsically better than them, just because they wear a suit. "You'll be hard put to find a polo shirt that comes close to even being half as distracting as that. You probably cant even remember what we were debating after looking at that picture." Ok, fine. Maybe that was a strech. But attractive girls will be oggled, no matter what they wear. "Outsiders have to be adults?" Uniforms have the same problem, unless you require teahers too wear them. "How much are the poor kids going to have to pay to get their ID's printed?" Only teachers would need them, because you an easily assume a kid won't break into a school. Thank you for reading.
School Uniforms benefit schools

"It helps studeents express themselves and be more creative." Yeah but you're talking about finding a look. "Clothes are an important way that kids express themselves in a relatively harmless way. When you take this away, kids may express themselves in a more negative way." So you are of the belief that kids expressing themselves with clothing will take from the other ways in which they could express themselves. Well thats what it sounds like from your above statement anyway. So by your logic allowing students to wear their own clothes would take from their expressing themselves and being creative in subjects like art, english and music. "But students need two sets of clothes, school clothes and regular clothes, making the ost much more." I'll give you that, but its a small price to pay to free up all that creativity that could be put to a better use than finding a look, isn't it? And why doesn't the student just buy the uniform if hes that stuck for money. There is no huge difference in the prices you found for us seeing as you left out the belt to go with the jeans and t-shirt. Your argument is based on the fact that someone might only be able to afford one pair of clothes but you haven't put forward any argument for why the jeans and t-shirt are a necessity. "Uniforms get tattered" Yes they do, but every student would be wearing the uniform to school every day. Whereas in a school where uniforms are not required a student who wore the same clothes to school every day would definitely be in the minority. In this way it would spare them embarassment. "and cost more to replace than regular clothes." The difference in cost is tiny if you don't include the belt. If the student kept his/her eyes on the floor on the way to the shop to replace the clothes, he/she would probably make up the difference. "It teaches kids to judge people based on how they look. That they all have too look the same in order to be equal." People in suits are generally a lot safer to approach that crack addicts. "Polo shirts show off a girl'surves, and can be very sexy." http://i68.photobucket.com... You'll be hard put to find a polo shirt that comes close to even being half as distracting as that. You probably cant even remember what we were debating after looking at that picture. "Outsiders always stand out, they are adults. Also, school ID's fix this probem easily." Outsiders have to be adults? "Also, school ID's fix this probem easily." How much are the poor kids going to have to pay to get their ID's printed?
School Uniforms benefit schools

"In what way does the individuality of the student benefit the school?" It helps studeents express themselves and be more creative. "Uniforms cost far less than normal clothes and there are back to school sales at the end of every summer." But students need two sets of clothes, school clothes and regular clothes, making the ost much more. "Uniforms are cheap. A lower class parent(as you would call them) would be far more likely to opt to send his/her child to a school in which uniforms must be worn as it would save him/her from having to provide different clothes for the 5 days of the week." Assuming someone buys their uniform at Macy's (We will use a standard uniform, A polo shirt with a belt and dress pants) Here are the respective costs. Polo shirt - $9.60 (http://www1.macys.com...) Dress pants - $20.00 (http://www1.macys.com...) Belt - $12.98 (http://www1.macys.com...) TOTAL COST $42.58 Compared to jeans and a t-shirt Jeans- $19.98 (http://www1.macys.com...) T-shirt - $7.99 (http://www1.macys.com...) TOTAL COST $27.97 Uniforms cost more than other clothes. "It would also spare the child the embarassment of wearing the same old tattered clothes to school everyday clearly identifying him/her as poor. Not that this is anything to be ashamed of, but kids are cruel." Uniforms get tattered, and cost more to replace than regular clothes. "What? How? I'd have said the exact opposite. Ok say you have the son of an oil tycoon and the son of a poor man attending the same school in which uniforms must be worn. Does the uniform not show them that no matter where they came from that they're all the same?" It teaches kids to judge people based on how they look. That they all have too look the same in order to be equal. Now to adress your argument "Uniforms take away worries like "what am I going to wear tomorrow" which allows more time for study and organisation." This issue can be resolved in 10 minutes, even for the pickiest of dressers. Uniforms also take more time to get into wasting time in the morning and after physical education. "They hide the figures of girls far better than what they would usually wear which allows the likes of me to stay concentrated on my studies." I am going to steal two figures from another debate on the same subject. Fig. 1.1 http://img355.imageshack.us... Polo shirts show off a girl'surves, and can be very sexy. Fig 1.2 http://img240.imageshack.us... T-shirts are unappealing. "In a school with uniforms any outsiders entering the school would stand out allowing for security to pick up on them a lot easier." Outsiders always stand out, they are adults. Also, school ID's fix this probem easily.
School Uniforms benefit schools

1. Uniforms reduce the individuality of the student In what way does the individuality of the student benefit the school? 2. Classism Uniforms cost far less than normal clothes and there are back to school sales at the end of every summer. Its funny how you refer to the students that cannot afford uniforms as lower class students. "This is clearly classism and blatantly discriminatory" Uniforms are cheap. A lower class parent(as you would call them) would be far more likely to opt to send his/her child to a school in which uniforms must be worn as it would save him/her from having to provide different clothes for the 5 days of the week. It would also spare the child the embarassment of wearing the same old tattered clothes to school everyday clearly identifying him/her as poor. Not that this is anything to be ashamed of, but kids are cruel. 3. Equality What? How? I'd have said the exact opposite. Ok say you have the son of an oil tycoon and the son of a poor man attending the same school in which uniforms must be worn. Does the uniform not show them that no matter where they came from that they're all the same? And now for a few of the reasons why I believe uniforms benefit schools. 1. Less distractions Uniforms take away worries like "what am I going to wear tomorrow" which allows more time for study and organisation. They hide the figures of girls far better than what they would usually wear which allows the likes of me to stay concentrated on my studies. So uniforms allow for more study, which would cause the average marks of a school to rise and theres surely extra funding granted to schools with high marks, so uniforms benefit schools. 2. Security. In a school with uniforms any outsiders entering the school would stand out allowing for security to pick up on them a lot easier. I'd write more but I'm wrecked.
School Uniforms benefit schools

DEFENITIONS SCHOOL- an institution where instruction is given, esp. to persons under college age (http://dictionary.reference.com...) UNIFORMS- an identifying outfit or style of dress worn by the members of a given profession, organization, or rank. (http://dictionary.reference.com...) BENEFIT- to do good to; be of service to (http://dictionary.reference.com...) CONTENTIONS 1. Uniforms reduce the individuality of the student Clothes are an important way that kids express themselves in a relatively harmless way. When you take this away, kids may express themselves in a more negative way. 2. Classism Only certain families are able to buy school uniforms, as they cost more than other clothes. This discourages any lower class students from going to a school with uniforms. This is clearly classism and blatantly discriminatory. 3. Equality Uniforms teach kids to judge people based on how they dressed, rather than the quality of their character. Children in any school, public or private, should always learn that people are equal to one another.
Polygamy is morally permissible.

Definitions Polygamy: marriage in which a spouse of either sex may have more than one mate at the same time. (Merriam-Webster) Morality: A code of conduct put forward by a society; used to determine right and wrong. (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Wikipedia) Morally permissible: Allowed or permitted by the rules of morality. Pre-Contention/Secondary Definition: Source of Morality Morality originates from evolution: what is evolutionarily beneficial is also moral. For example, murder is immoral because murder makes it more difficult for the species to survive. Selflessness is moral because it improves the species as a whole. So I will be taking an evolutionary perspective with regard to polygamy. For my contentions, I will assume that the case of polygamy is a male who has multiple wives. Contention 1: Polygamy allows for more rapid reproduction. A female can only produce offspring once per nine months; but a male can fertilize multiple women within the same day. If a man has multiple wives, this rapid reproduction can be efficiently utilized to increase the vitality of the species as a whole. Contention 2: Polygamy makes it easier to raise children. When several women work together to raise children, their combined efforts make it much easier. They can fill in each other's weaknesses: if one wife has to work, for example, another can take care of her child. This sort of supportive structure is encouraged by polygamy. Contention 3: Polygamy increases diversity. A man with multiple wives has the opportunity to spread his genes further. This shuffling of the gene pool creates increased diversity, which is beneficial to the species. Diversity allows for a richer community, and is overall very helpful. I look forward to my opponent's response. [1] http://www.jstor.org... [2] http://www.jstor.org...