The Christian God exists (10)

Thanks to Pro for accepting, I too hope we can have a very useful discussion which provides some food for thought.You can use any interpretation, translation, or arguments from the Bible as you see fit. I see them all equally as wrong, so you can use whichever version you'd like.I'll respond to Pro's paragraphs number by number.1. Spontaneous generation is not the term you're looking for. Spontaneous generation was used to describe life popping out of thin air, as maggots and mold were thought to do back in the day[1]. However, we believe that it was through cosmic evolution that simple life forms came about, which is completely consistent with the laws of physics. We don't know exactly what the first life form was or what the conditions it formed in were, but we have some proof-of-concept-like experiments which show that it could have happened[2]. Overall there's no proof of abiogenesis, but it's the most consistent explanation we have in current day.2. Again spontaneous generation is not really the term you're looking for. All these natural elements can be created from the elements that the universe started out with. I won't (and probably couldn't) go into detail about how all the different elements can create one another and lay out a whole model where the universe only needs a few key elements. However, as an example of elements creating other elements, we can look at the sun, where hydrogen becomes helium[3]. This brings us back to the origin of the universe, and I say that the universe was an uncaused cause. This does not require as much faith as a belief in God because we can observe the universe (look around you), yet we can't observe god.3. Just because we can't comprehend something does not mean it does not exist. Just because we can't understand infinity doesn't mean infinities don't happen. 4. No, that's not what atheists say. We say that because there is no evidence for god, it is very unlikely he exists and we see no reason to believe in him (a negative claim), rather than the positive claim and logical fallacy[4] of saying that "there's no evidence for god, therefore he doesn't exist." Also, these theories, etc. should not be rejected because there's valid evidence to back them up, of which there is none to back up god.5. No, I do not believe that our universe is made up of infinite space, but that is simply my personal belief because I have seen no evidence indicating the universe is limitless or that it is limited, but a limited universe makes it easier for me to comprehend the universe, so I go with that. I'm very willing to change my ideas about that, though.6. Yes, I believe in extraterrestrial life because I believe that the universe is such a vast place that there must certainly be something else out there. So I do agree with you on that.7. Oh, yes, I am very familiar with this study. In fact, I just recently refuted it. You can see that refutation here[5]; I will quote the entire refutation if you'd like.8. I do not believe that logic dictates that there must be any supernatural being. I look forward to Pro's response to this and will be watching anime in the meantime. Good luck.Sources:1. http://www.infoplease.com...2. http://people.chem.duke.edu...3. http://science.howstuffworks.com...4. http://www.fallacyfiles.org...5. http://www.debate.org...