Obama and his policies

"It means they cant restrict the amount of guns people purchase. Now tanks and rocket launchers aren't sold because, who else is going to use a rocket launcher for target practice, hunting, etc. besides the military? "Is that really the actual reason why you think tanks and rocket launchers arent sold to the public? I can guarantee that violent anarchists, gang members, people in the mafia, etc would LOVE to be able to have access to rocket launchers and other insanely large armaments for their own use. .. The reason why they cant though is because those things are ILLEGAL to own even though the Second Amendment may imply otherwise. Like I said before, the Second Amendment is open to interpretation, is not universal, and claiming otherwise just because you feel that way doesnt change anything/ "There has been talk in the Obama administration, advised by senate and led by Biden to ban violent video games. Parts of his Cabinet are in the talks and, as I said is being led by Biden. "NOBODY is talking about banning violent video games. The only mention about violent video games anywhere in the executive orders he passed is that he wants the CDC to study to see if there might be a possible connection between violent video games and shootings in real life. NOWHERE does he, or anyone else in his administration, claim to want to ban violent video games. . http://abclocal.go.com...By the way, if you make a wild claim and dont give any evidence to support the claim, then people are going to treat it s if you made it up, which frankly, im sure you did. " He lost a lot of ground and he lied about it not being Al-Qaeda for 17 days. He should be impeached for Perjury. "Jesus dude, NOBODY in the administration knew for sure what had caused the embassy shooting because it could have just as easily been an angry mob revolting about that "Innocence of Muslims" video, it could have been another terrorist organization, it could have been any number of things. Obama didnt lie about something he didnt even know about in the first place. "It is still his Cabinet. The buck stops with him. "So if someone in his cabinet spills hot coffee on someone's lap, then its Obama's fault since its his cabinet? Thats the dumbest thing Ive ever heard. .. Obama doesnt get the requests for more security added to his desk, and he most certainly doesnt get increased security requests after theyve already been denied on three different occasions. .. . "These warnings were way before any video actually came out. Yes it was a cover up, yes it was a conspiracy. "Youre being retarded. .. Just because the government was tripping over their own feet in trying to figure out what happened, it doesnt mean that there is some vast government conspiracy going on. .. . By your logic then the terrible response time by FEMA to help New Orleans must have also been a government conspiracy. .. .. Just because the government isnt efficient, it doesnt mean theres a conspiracy afoot. "It was his administration still. The people HE chose are not doing their jobs correctly. And I have a high doubt that he didn't know about any of it"Do you have any evidence to support this claim or are you just pulling this stuff out of your a** again? Not everything the US does passes through Obama's desk, thats not how the government works. The reason we have committees is to do part of Obamas job for him. "If I remember correctly, he had the Keystone project delayed. "Yeah, because there were environmental issues, the canadian company that wanted to construct the pipeline had a history of fraud and cooking numbers to get funding, and there was speculation on whether the pipeline would even affect gas prices at all. . http://www.nytimes.com... "Yes, but he could have given them more security. There is no way that he couldn't have known about the 3 denies. "Not everything in the world sits on Obama's desk at one point or another, in fact only a fraction of all decisions the US government makes even requires input from Obama. The reason committees exist is to handle specific tasks on their own without intervention by the president. "You used politifact which is biased so I'm just going to give you the numbers of lies and leave it at that. "Really? The guy who uses f*cking foxnews. com as his main source for his arguments is going to try to accuse me of using biased sources to disprove an argument? How about you give some valid sources to support your claims for once. "Congress is failing because he pushes bills past congress through the democrats in congress. Bills that no one on the republican side is supporting"The Republicans control the House of Representatives and the Democrats only control the House of Representatives by 3 people if you count the two independents. .. . . http://en.wikipedia.org...Obama isnt ramming bills through Congress through Democratic super-majorities because the Democratic super-majorities dont exist in Congress. .. If every Democrat in Congress approved a bill by Obama and every Republican rejected it, the bill would be killed each and every time. "And again, you used a biased source. "1 second later"Obama is getting praise from people on the radical side of politics. ". http://www.foxnews.com...... "I know you are probably going to get me on the bias with the foxnews source but i guarantee that its not the only source"Then give other sources! Dont just claim they are out there because it suits you. Also dont try to claim that my sources are biased and then go straight to the motherload of biased sources for your arguments. ==========================================================================Dropped arguments by the Pro:- 1 - Pro forfeits the fact that the US has had consecutive months of job growth dating back for years (in fact the US added 157,000 jobs last month alone . http://www.huffingtonpost.com...)- 2 - Pro forfeits that Obama didnt 'lie' about Bengazi for four months- 3 - Pro forfeits that it's Congress who can only draft balanced budgets and not Obama- 4 - Pro forfeits that Obama wasnt president in 2008 so what happened in 2008 wasnt Obama's fault- 5 - Pro forfeits that Obama has tightened access to welfare and TANF- 6 - Pro forfeits that Obama is trying to increase funding to education and that Obama isnt the reason why its failing- 7 - Pro forfeits the fact that his claim about the stimulus shipping jobs overseas is a bs claim. - 8 - Pro forfeits the fact that Obama offered to cut funding in Social programs like Social Security, and still tries to claim Obama isnt bi-partisian- 9 - Pro forfeits his own claim that Obama is doing everything in his power to harm the middle and lower class- 10 - Pro forfeits the argument that it wasnt Obama's fault for the US being downgraded in credit- 11 - Pro forfeits that the Second amendment is open to interpretation and that there are already laws against gun ownership that most agree isnt Unconstitutional- 12 - Pro forfeits his original claim that the US is about to enter a second recession after giving no evidence to suggest such a claim is even close to being true. - 13 - Pro forfeits that companies are making record profits- 14 - Pro forfeits that the stock market has never been betterAll in all, a good chunk of Pro's arguments are based on his own horrendously false opinions, he admits to not having researched portions of his arguments at all, he sources less that 25% of his arguments, and the sources he does give are almost exclusively from foxnews whereas mine are from everywhere but them. .. .