Hamas is more at fault for the current suffering of Palestinians than Israel.

Thank you for your response.You claim once again that Israel has deliberately created Hamas. This is blatantly false and you have not proven this. All you did was use my source to prove that Israel was enemies with the PLO. You claim the PLO was secular in nature but they have initiated several attacks against Israeli civilians and therefore Israel responded. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_AttritionFrom 1967 and on, the PLO was actually more violent and extreme and not secular contrary to what you have claimed. More and more organizations emerged that conducted attacks against Israelis including the the murder of 9 Israeli athletes in the olympics. www.historylearningsite.co.uk/palestinian_liberation_order.htmCon you really need to drop this case that Israel is responsible for the creation of Hamas because 1. It is not really relevant as we are comparing whose actions caused more suffering to Palestinians in the current situation. 2. You have not even supported it."Firstly, we have to raise inquiries;Israel, whose hatred of Palestinians drove them to create disunity in Palestine, could have stopped the creation of Hamas if it had arrested Yassin and dismantled his charity. But they did not; did they in this case. created Hamas indirectly?"1. Israel did arrest Yassin once murder of Israelis were conducted. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Hamas You used my source then neglect to mention this. 2. As I have proven in the previous round Hamas was already growing. Not arresting Yassin would not have stopped the creation of Hamas you have no basis to make this claim.So to answer your question, no, they did not at least there is not enough evidence for you to make such a case. "Secondly, why did Israel ignore reports of the growing Hamas threats? Avner Cohen, surveying the damage that his bungalow received from a Hamas rocket, recorded that ï¿½€""Hamas was an enormous, stupid mistakeï¿½€ï¿½ Note that he was the same person who wrote reports to the Israeli Government regarding the development of Hamas. "1. It is silly that you are trying to prove that Hamas was formed by Israel based on the view of one Israeli when YOUR OWN SOURCE says that most Israeli soldiers share the few that it was because of Iran which is actually a much more substantiated claim. Iran was looking for a way to show its hate for Israel after 1979. english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2014/07/25/Does-the-Islamic-Republic-genuinely-support-Hamas-for-the-Palestinian-cause-.html 2. Like both you and I have mentioned Israel was currently at war with other groups including Fatah. All they wanted to do was prevent suicide bombers and other attackers from coming. 3. Israel did not ignore it completely read what I said above. The opponent allegedly states that Hamas was not the creation of Israel because they are already fighting each other in the 1980s. This is a vague description; notice that the Gaza then was still under de facto Israeli rule. Apart from that, the opponent concerns himself with mainly the affairs of the 21st century, henceforth ignoring all that came before the 21st century. Note that this contention is based upon the creation of Hamas, not the empowering of Hamas. Hamas was democratically elected in 2006, as the opponent states; this was Israel’s gravest mistake. Con even if you successfully prove that Israel's is responsible for the growth of Hamas, that is not relevant to this debate. What is relevant is how Hamas got elected and as I have proven, Israel had nothing to do with it. "The opponent allegedly states that Hamas was not the creation of Israel because they are already fighting each other in the 1980s. This is a vague description; notice that the Gaza then was still under de facto Israeli rule. Apart from that, the opponent concerns himself with mainly the affairs of the 21st century, henceforth ignoring all that came before the 21st century. Note that this contention is based upon the creation of Hamas, not the empowering of Hamas. Hamas was democratically elected in 2006, as the opponent states; this was Israel’s gravest mistake." 1. I gave a history of Hamas that was relevant to this debate it was actually my first argument but you have disregarded and accused me of ignoring what came before the 21st century. 2. I concern myself with affairs of the 21st century because I said in round 1 that this is the focus of the debate! 3. Again con I have proven numerous times already Israel hardly is responsible for the growth of Hamas. I have definitely proved that Israel had nothing to with the election of Hamas so you are just writing down untrue statements. Weapons My opponent has only stated the rockets Hamas generally uses. This is very misleading and not pertinent to the debate because I have clearly stated in round 1 that I am referring to the rockets used in the last few months so while my opponent gave an irrelevant history of Hamas's rockets let's examine the history that is actually relevant to the debate. Hamas has been firing M-302 rockets at Israel capable of 150 km distance. This is a lot different than what my opponent mentions by only mentioning the weaker ones. These are legitimate rockets used by China and Syria. www.nbcnews.com/storyline/middle-east-unrest/hamas-firing-china-designed-syria-made-m-302-rockets-israel-n152461 The history you give in the first paragraph is completely irrelevant to your case. However, it is relevant to mine. By launching these rockets, it poses a huge threat to Israel and therefore Israel is forced to respond which contributes to the suffering of the Palestinians. My opponent then brings up how Israeli has higher military capability. There is no need to cite three sources just to prove that it is very clear Israel has stronger military power and no one can testify otherwise. But, you have ignored one of my main arguments which is that with every rocket Hamas launches they know that Israel is going to respond with these airstrikes so it is Hamas that brings on these airstrikes. My opponent makes an absurd point: The people of Gaza have no missile defense system. This completely helps my case. This is definitely at the fault of Hamas. Well con let's examine a few things and then you tell me that they should have a missile defense system. 1. This will not help prevent the airstrikes. 2. When you give Hamas Israeli concrete for bomb shelters they build tunnels to plan a massive terrorist attack on the Jewish new year. www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/hamas-tunnels-stoke-anxiety-bolstering-israelis-support-of-war/2014/07/31/ae67267e-18e7-11e4-85b6-c1451e622637_story.html At this point I think you and the voters know why you cannot place anything like that anywhere near Hamas. Hamas has stolen even aid and Palestinians have admitted it. www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&nid=21252 You have also made another baseless and false claim that Israel deliberately attacks innocent civilians and this is not true. Israel in general always sent leaflets and as I have proven Hamas has told their people to disregard their warnings and use themselves as human shields. If they get killed it is Hamas that is clearly responsible and not Israel. Israel has opened a new hospital for Palestinians to treat them and you say they deliberately want them dead? Hamas in the past has not let them go into Israeli hospitals so who wants who dead? http://www.jpost.com... You point out that Israel attacked a UN school and that there is no justification. There actually is! Israel is justified to go after the weapons used against its civilians. Again this is at the fault of Hamas for placing their rockets in several UN schools there is no justification for that! Also not that what you said here is at all relevant to the debate but you said Hamas killed three Israeli teens. Hamas has killed over 67 people including three civilians. You cannot neglect to mention important facts con. Leadership Now con I have a HUGE problem with your arguments here. You argue that Israeli attacks in Gaza to dismantle the weapons attacking their civilians are unjustifiable. And yet YOU ARE JUSTIFYING SUICIDE BOMBINGS AND PREACHING OF DEATH TO LITTLE CHILDREN. This is no way justifiable. And your justification is something that occurred in the 1980's! My argument still stands that Hamas on a leadership has not protected their civilians like leaders are responsible for but rather they either endangered or killed their civilians. Human shields As much as I would love to address my opponent's arguments on Israel's action in 2009 it is not at all relevant to the debate about the situation in the last few months and I am short on time. I ask my opponent to please stop giving irrelevant arguments and not ignore mine as these actions are bad conduct. Looking forward to your response.