Conservatism and Libertarianism are ideological allies

First, I'd like to point out that Pro hasn't attempted to refute my own conception of or reasoning for the dissimilarities between conservatism and libertarianism. Therefore I'll simply extend my entire case.===Deconstruction of Pro's case===Def. of Conservatism.1) Pro's definition of conservatism doesn't actually contain an argument. It's simply a conjectural statement of his view concerning what conservatism is.2) On it's own, the definition is flawed considering that it leaves out a large segment of self-described conservatives. For instance, the religious conservatives I pointed to in R2 would be left out considering that freedom is valued only inasmuch as it furthers their religious agenda. Therefore my own conception of conservatism is more inclusive and comprehensive than Pro's.3) Pro's definition of conservatism doesn't include social conservatives. While having a large overlap with religious conservatives, social conservatives are defined by their traditional views on social issues like abortion, drug use, and same-sex marriage. Pro's own def. of libertarianism says that it doesn't support prohibition of something unless that action violates the rights of others. However, things like same-sex marriage and drug use don't contain any direct/tangible infringements on the rights of others. Therefore we should either abandon Pro's definition or leave out a huge segment of conventionally described conservatives.Def. of Libertarianism.I don't have a problem at current with Pro's definition of libertarianism, merely his application.The alleged common goal.The problem with the "common goal" that Pro ascribes to libertarianism and conservatism is that it's incredibly ambiguous. These are things that most proponents of an ideology would describe themselves as supporting. Thus they're simply buzzwords unless each is expanded on, specifically in regards to methodology. For example, Marxists would certainly wish for all of those things, simply because they use the words in a way which allows for that description. Freedom is defined as freedom to the necessities and freedom from capitalism. On the other hand, libertarians would defined freedom completely negatively. The common goal Pro cites is thus more or less incoherent and inapplicable to the specifics necessary for this debate.Similarity vs. Difference.Pro argues that by definition, the two ideologies have the same paramount value, being liberty. However, as I've pointed out before, this definition of conservatism is excludes a huge amount of people traditionally viewed as conservative, social and religious conservatives among them. Traditional American Value.On the various analyses of traditional American policy issues, let's take them in order. On abortion, I agree that much of the reasoning relies on different interpretations of liberty. However, in the absence of any other positions on the subject of Pro's being sound, a holistic view still supports my own conceptions of libertarianism and conservatism. On gay marriage, Pro never explains how the principle of liberty is simply differently applied here. On national defense, Pro never forwards an argument for why the "different interpretation" principle is somehow superior to my own thesis that conservatives simply don't take liberty as their primary value. Furthermore, Pro's reasoning isn't even sound. Infringing on citizen's rights via wiretapping, etc. isn't a legitimate protection of liberty, it simply replaces who's violating it. Therefore, citing the conservative viewpoint as holding something like security in higher regards makes the most sense. Conclusion.Pro's definitions are not only not supported by argument by Pro (he more than not simply states them) but he hasn't attempted to refute by argument my own conception. Furthermore, the tradition thesis is not only more comprehensive in that it succeeds in accounting for widely divergent strands of conservatism, but likewise the tradition thesis of conservatism fails by ignoring a large segment of beliefs traditionally associated with conservatism like religious and social conservatives. These strands are inexplicable on the liberty thesis but can be expressly accounted for on the tradition thesis. Conservatism and libertarianism probably overlap in some areas, however, the radical difference in ultimate goals and values is too great to hold them as allies.