BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
(TV)Novak Djokovic vs Roger Federer 2018 Live Stream

Roger Federer vs Novak Djokovic LIVE stream: How to watch Cincinnati Masters final online https://bit. Ly/2PldaGI https://bit. Ly/2PldaGI Roger Federer vs Novak Djokovic LIVE stream How to watch expresscouk " Sport " Tennis 36 mins ago Federer and Djokovic will meet for the first time in twoandahalf years at 9pm (BST) tonight providing Simona Halep vs Kiki Bertens does not What time is Roger Federer vs Novak Djokovic? Schedule live stream expresscouk " Sport " Tennis 6 hours ago ROGER FEDERER and Novak Djokovic was the dream final for Cincinnati Masters organisers after Rafael Nadal pulled out of the tournament ((WaTcH~FrEe))~Novak Djokovic vs Roger Federer live stream sonderborgdk/da/watchfreenovakdjokovicvsrogerfedererlivestream 4 hours ago Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer live stream will meet for the 46th time (Image Cincinnati Masters LIVE stream How to watch Federer and You've visited this page 2 times Last visit 8/19/18 {Live HD TV} Novak Djokovic vs Roger Federer Live stream vagabondonet/itlivehdtvnovakdjokovicvsrogerfedererlivestre 57 mins ago Novak Djokovic vs Roger Federer TV Channel Live Stream Time What TV Channel is the Federer Djokovic Final LIVEWatch Djokovic vs You've visited this page 2 times Last visit 8/19/18 ((WaTcH~FrEe))~Novak Djokovic vs Roger Federer live stream digifotopronl/userswatchfreenovakdjokovicvsrogerfedererlivestream Novak Djokovic vs Roger Federer TV Channel Live Stream Time What TV Channel is the Federer Djokovic Final LIVE`59; httpbitly/DjokovicvsFedererFree You've visited this page 2 times Last visit 8/19/18 [[LrLive]] Roger Federer vs Novak Djokovic Live streaming digifotopronl215197lrliverogerfederervsnovakdjokoviclivestreamin Roger Federer vs Stan Wawrinka LIVE stream How to watch Cincinnati Masters tie online Expresscouk " 1 day ago Novak Djokovic vs Marin Cilic LIVE {{{HD}}} roger federer vs novak djokovic wimbledon live streaming hartpatientennlhdrogerfederervsnovakdjokovi Translate this page 12 hours ago 1 post THE WIMBLEDON final lastuponus but it is to have Red Hat is Novak Djokovic and to Kevin in Anderson who will contest it not Roger You've visited this page 3 times Last visit 8/19/18 Videos 821 Roger Federer vs Novak Djokovic Best ATP Rallies Ever Tennis TV YouTube Jun 22 2018 132 Best Shots & Rallies Cincinnati 2018 Day 7 Tennis TV YouTube 17 hours ago 501 2015 Western & Southern Open Final Roger Federer v Novak Djokovic Tennis TV YouTube Aug 24 2015 345 Novak Djokovic vs Roger Federer ATP Dubai 2015 Final Highlights Tennis TV YouTube Mar 1 2015 042 Roger Federer Championship point vs Novak Djokovic in 2015 ATP Tennis TV YouTube Feb 28 2015 051 Rafa Nadal & Novak Djokovic's crazy 23shot tie break rally Wimbledon YouTube Jul 14 2018 330 Federer beats Nadal Kyrgios stuns Djokovic | Indian Wells 2017 Day Tennis TV YouTube Mar 16 2017 Web results Novak Djokovic vs Roger Federer Live Stream 2018 Online hartpatientennlnovakdjokovicvsrogerfedererli Translate this page 12 hours ago 1 post The Federer"Djokovic rivalry is between two professional tennis players Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic They have played each other 34
As of April 2013 is the US foreign policy which remains unchanged since the cold war,still justified

The only part ill consider because this debate is specifically the point after the cold war, The previous two were part of the wold war where both nations foreign relations were on the same level of intervention. Ill admit the faults of the middle eastern conflict, but it also helped us realize how ineffective we were in fighting terrorists/ guerrillas. It did cost lives and quite a bit of money, but it hasnt drastically crushed us, the Economy has had worse debt mostly concerning the post war WW2 economy which people thought it was going to fail because of the new influx of soldiers being unable to get jobs, this ended up causing a huge economic boom. Now back to the policies, as much as i disagree in wasting american lives in very futile efforts i do agree that it is still necessary, America has to maintain its global supremacy, in its huge quest for power against the Soviets it has gathered a huge slew of direct and in-direct enemies. Big example would be China, It is a nations that for the longest time has dreamt of paying back its oppressors of the past 200 years. Mostly Russia and the west. While it wasnt directly the US the US is still the greatest success the western world has developed. America then in its own self interest and the interest of the less powerful european nations even some of the economically successful nations in asia, must maintain its supremacy until Japan fully rearms, Korea and Reunited under the Southern government, and Australia develops a decent navy that can help bottleneck an aggressive chinese expansionist government that wishes to alleviate its population and environmental issues. China is an up and comming Superpower and that is something the United States does not want to happen referencing its asia centric military plan, which could easily cut costs but easily gaurding the atlantic which is less prone to an assualt. This policy is hence more merited than globally retracting and becomming more vulnerable while also compromising global security
As of April 2013 is the US foreign policy which remains unchanged since the cold war,still justified

I believe that the US's current foriegn policy suceeme is not justified and I'll show you several examples to show you that I'm right.I'll now define Justified as Having, done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason. http://www.google.com...But we can also see that the end result must also be good, because those who ignore the end result consequenses are ignoring the world.ChileIn Chile, the United States wanted a more American supportive government and they interveened in the 1970's, but it only turns out that after the assasination the nation's new leader is anti-american and commits great attrocities of which weren't happening before the US interveened and caused a coup to get rid of the old government in Chile.https://www.cia.gov...KyrgyzstanThe US interveened here to inorder to eliminate an Islamist regieme inorder to install a western friendly government and it came out even worse. The current government restricts water rights which are key to these people and the reason that we don't hear about it in America is becuase the United States doesn't want to admit their own failure! http://spectator.org... Middle EastMany people argue that we've gone into Iraq and done great for their government, but the truth is that we went in their for oil and in Pakistan and Afghanistan the United States discovered a REM (rare earth metal) depossit and decided to exploit it!http://isreview.org...I now await my opponent's response.
As of April 2013 is the US foreign policy which remains unchanged since the cold war,still justified

As of April 2013 is the US foreign policy mostly concerning its military, which is still unchanged since the cold war, Justifiable. Yes, The United States of America maintains the single largest global presence which makes the old British Empire look a tad weak in all aspects. The US maintains multiple alliance systems that have been in place since early 60's and from then on. It has been involved in the preservation of freedom and its nations interests, which happen to be shared by much of the worlds prosperous nations. But is its military strength currently necessary in its current situation, should it scale back in order to cut spending and recover from its disastrous debt. In essence, no. Its Global presence are most time the only things that prevent large scale conflict between many nations.
As of April 2013 is the US foreign policy which remains unchanged since the cold war,still justified

PacificThis seems to be his point he keeps trying to get at. Currently the United States has a One China Policy, which recognizes Taiwan part of the China. Though this argument actually goes to my favor because the US has been contradicting itself by shipping weapons and such to Taiwan! This has heavily angered China and has lead China to begin it's currency manipulation, which devalues the US dollar. Secondly for North Korea, the reason that North Korea acts up is because they can't grow their own food and they have to import it from elsewhere. They are like that kid that is whining in the store for the candy bar. They just act up so the US will give them food so they can eat. But for some reason the US hasn't given North Korea food this time, leading to a possible war based on their current foreign policy.IranWeather you want to believe it or not, but Iran is at war with the US. It is written into the Iranian Constitution that it must destroy the Big Satan, the US, and the Little Satan, Israel. The reason that there has yet to be bloodshed is because the US has yet to recognize this. So you can see here that Iran is just tuning up for the war and yet again it is a failure for American Foreign Policy.My PointsMy opponent has yet to fully address or even refute these points so you can go ahead and extend these points across the board.ConclusionSo we can see either all the points that Pro brought up either works in my favor or he drops them so I can see nothing but a Con vote, thank you.
As of April 2013 is the US foreign policy which remains unchanged since the cold war,still justified

Just fyi im not conceding but its not the important point im trying to make, The United States is currently shifting pacific wise and will revive the adage that it needs all its global positions to deal with it. As much as a trade agreement is beneficial between the two countries, when it comes to Taiwan China acts very irrationally, and even in the case of North Korea they also act very irrationally, The emergence of a chinese navy regardless of their technological lag is made up by their missiles which can accurately hit targets and displace US influence. If you cant admit that US Global supremacy regardless of the nations it keeps pacified (mostly to prevent it comming back with avengance) isnt beneficial than you really dont understand the role its foreign policy plays, The high seas have been free of pirates for the most part as well as rougue navy's purely off the fact that piracy is not viable with the US navy taking out everyone who threatens trading routes etc. Its also a sense of national pride, America for the most part won the cold war and has maintained the fact that it won, its dominates globally, and it actually allows many nations to develop without issues regarding having to worry about protecting shipping, building up an overly large military, and keepings an enemy at bay. As it comes to terms with Russia, the Russian Federation albeit currently lacking in internal development is mostly because of the fact of their corruption, they are quite like the US was early in the 20th century. They have corrupt buisiness practices and it will end up with reform and a resurgent russia developing its internal system. Besides US foreign policy saves more lives than it costs, If Iran were to get a nuclear weapon it would without doubt nuke israel without warning. the nation is small and would probably be completely wiped out by the nuclear explosion, this would kill millions. Regardless of the fact the US forces its agenda on some more belligerent nations that wish to hamper global security. Even China admits to the need for US ability to provide much global security especially with the DPRK situation, If the US didnt get involved with korea if another war broke out then it lies with China to make a move with would severely hamper them as they have no choice but to costfully rebuild a most likely devastated North Korea. All in all for its faults, as every nation has, the US foreign policy saves more lives, looks very bad at times, but does ensure global security, ensures a unhampered global economy that gives us the ability to communicate and debate this effectively as we are. American interests are the only thing that prevent the world from falling back into huge amounts of conflict or war
As of April 2013 is the US foreign policy which remains unchanged since the cold war,still justified

KyrgyzstanMy opponent concedes this argument here so you can extend across my point here.Middle East My opponent agrees here to you also you can extend across my agreements here.HaitiIn 1995, the CIA and the US Marines launched a campaign to put in power President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in Haiti just because he was pro-American, or so they thought. Nearly 10 years latter the he began doing many more atrocities and the US removes him from power after they had put him in place 10 years ago. https://www.globalpolicy.org... ChechnyaFor those of you who don't know Chechnya is a province in Russia near the nation of Georgia. http://www.cnn.com... The US here has been arming both the Chechnyan rebles and the Russian furthering bloodshed inured to prevent Russia to focus on non-domestic issues. http://dagmar.lunarpages.com... and http://www.foxnews.com... ChinaThe only point that the Pro has successfully brought up. First off China would never declare war on China, because of the current trading partnership between the two nations. https://www.uschina.org... Not only that but China won't surpass the US as a superpower, because their military is too far behind the US's, as a matter of fact China is 20 years behind the United States. http://www.defensenews.com... (note the PLA is the People Liberation Army, China's military nickname.)So with that I now await my opponent to respond.
banning smoking

The only reason smoking is banned from subways, planes, etc., is that smoking will affect non-smoker's health. That is why they put aside a smoking area for smokers to smoke, without affecting other people, like children, or infants.Smokers do NOT have the only real community that is left in the workplace today.Yes, smokers do suffer less stress from taking multiple breaks, but non-smokers can take breaks too. There are other things in this world to do, other than what all smokers are addicted to, smoking.The "bruhaha" about second hand smoking is NOT a "load of crap". Thousands of people have died or recieved lung disease, due to a smoker in their family.It's not cool to smoke.Smokers do support the economy by paying all those taxes, but they can also buy other things, other than cigarette packs. For example, they can buy groceries to support their family AND the economy."The Surgeon General fails to warn you that non-smokers die every day." What do you mean? Isn't it obvious? But more smokers die every day than non-smokers, and smokers die earlier.You just agreed with me. Second hand smoke does cause lung problems, and if they are as addicted as you say they are, smokers aren't likely to stop.Yes, the harmful chemicals stay in cigarettes, but the safe ones you can keep.Nicotine does help, but note it's a "drug". These are meant to be used in hospital prescriptions. Yes, smokers do have a lower risk of some diseases, which are almost impossible to get even without smoking, but smoking increases the risk of hundreds more common diseases."Smokers actually recovered better from a heart attack than nonsmokers". Where did you find this, considering this is completely false. Smokers's hearts are in far worse condition than non-smokers.Yes, alcohol may contain more lead and chemicals than cigarettes. BUT, people do not drink often. They drink probably once a week or twice a week, but smokers smoke so much more. They smoke maybe 2 packs a day, every day, which is far worse than drinking once in a while. And drinking does not affect the people around you, as smoking does.
banning smoking

I am suprised that people only look at the negative sides of smoking has anyone tried looking at this?People often go with the general sentiment on things like these, most of what you hear is hogwash. Cases of cancer are linked with smoking, but it's not proof. Only 1 in 3 of us will get lung cancer. (By "us" I also include non smokers). Smokers are a persecuted lot, since this habit has been banned from workplaces, restaurants, buses, subways and planes. You don't think they'd outlaw breathing for christ's sake. Smokers have the only real community that's left in the workplace today. Smokers suffer from less stress, since they actually take a few breaks per day. That bruhaha about second hand smoking is a load of crap. it's just a phrase made up to get normal people who earlier didn't care about it, to go and further persecute the smokers. It's cool to smoke. Ever seen a hacker or a real artist with a health shake? Smokers support the economy by paying all those taxes, which *AHEM* some of us don't. Warning: The Surgeon General fails to warn you that non-smokers die every day Studies have shown that prolonged contact (as in several years) with second hand smoking can cause mild lung problems. Second hand smoke has no immediate harmful effects. Actually, why not just ban non-smokers? :D Too much is made of the 4000 chemicals that make up a cigarette. Several carcinogens found in cigarettes are found in peppers, carrots, strawberries, tomatoes, onions and grapefruit. Believe it or not, nicotine is actually "a surprisingly potent drug for a variety of diseases that afflict the brain, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Tourette's syndrome." (An image makeover for nicotine: It shows promise against brain diseases, HealthCentral.com - Feb. 21, 2000) Smokers have a 60% lower risk of Parkinson's disease Nicotine has a positive effect on ulcerative colitis, which is an inflammation of the stomach lining, and this disorder affects nonsmokers more than smokers. Smokers actually recovered better from a heart attack than nonsmokers Smoking was found to reduce the risk of estrogen-dependent endometrial cancer (dunno what that means, it just sounds really cool) Schizophrenics (4 million Americans) who smoke can get enough nicotine stimulation to switch on a brain receptor that helps filter information. Stanford researchers have discovered that low doses of nicotine - a major component of cigarette smoke - appear to promote new blood vessel growth (in mice). ("Nicotine to be used to treat heart disease," Reuters Health, HealthCentral.com - Sept. 2000) Alcohol is even more harmful than smoking. Yet not much is said against it as compared to smoking. Half a bottle of wine can supply you with 32-40 times the amount of lead a whole pack of smokes can give you. "Sick smokers may burden a country's health care system but dead smokers save governments money" sorry I got carried away ? I rest my case :)
banning smoking

You are correct. If someone smokes, you should respect their desicion.However, they are making bad descicions. These descicions cause them to be avoided in society and elsewhere.First of all, a pack of cigarretes costs about 5 dollars. Some people smoke 2 packs a day. This equals to 10 dollars a day, which equals to about 3650 dollars a year spent on cigarettes. Do you know how much money $3650 could do to help support their family? But instead, they are out there spending money that their family could use for their own enjoyment.Secondly, smoking causes horrible health. Smoking frequently leads to development of lung cancer, or even worse. This will cause you to die at an early age. And if you have a family, and you support your family the most by your income, what would happen when you die? Your family would probably be in huge trouble.Thirdly, and the most important reason - Secondhand smoke. This is the main reason people who smoke in public are avoided. Some people don't smoke for a REASON. Because they know of the consequences, and choose not too. So if someone who is smoking comes up to you in public, why WOULDNT you avoid them? If you don't, you have the possibilty of inhaling secondhand smoke, which can cause disease.
Barney and Robin should not have divorced in How I Met Your Mother

The How I Met Your Mother series finale should not have included the divorce of Barney and Robin. This is because the whole point of the finale season was viewed around Barney and Robin's wedding. They fought during the last season and they made up immensely, with a touching sensitive side of Barney that is not usually seen. That said, Robin changed Barney for the better because of his personality change and his change of heart. However, that all went away when they divorced. Not only was their divorce a quick side note in the last episode, but it changed the whole point of the season. Instead of Barney being a changed man, he goes back to using women as sexual objects and ends up getting one of the women pregnant, and she is not even important enough for the audience to know her name! Although Barney then "changed his heart" once the baby was born, it should not have happened like that. The divorce of Barney and Robin ruins the rest of the show in some aspects because many of the episodes, such as when Barney proposed to Robin, are meaningless now that we know the outcome of the marriage. It is also a bad message to marriages in the world because it shows that if a marriage is going through a tough time, rather than trying to fix the problem, a couple should simply divorce and move on. I mean look how well it worked out for Barney and Robin. Barney ended up with a child and a change of heart, and Robin ended up with the real love of her life. If only that was what happened in real life! Yet, that is the message it is sending to its millions of viewers. In conclusion, Barney and Robin should have at least shown some effort in trying to fix their marriage or should have not divorced at all.
Barney and Robin should not have divorced in How I Met Your Mother

Well outside of this just resorting to the classic " I did not like it so it's wrong", I don't feel the need to excuse the writer's decision to do what they did given that tv writing(especially for sitcoms) is primarily not done in the traditional sense and that most of the seasons are done as a separate entity. (i.e. they write each season as it gets funded, not as a whole). In the matter of opinions. I think Season 9 was always going to be a letdown in some areas. Whether it be the Robin and Barney relationship(which didn't really add up) or him eventually meeting the mother. The problem with ending in long running series is that expectations are always too high. Sitcoms are one of the worse offenders, with either very lazy endings, or no ending at all.
Barney and Robin should not have divorced in How I Met Your Mother

Yes this is a very opinionated debate, but with that comes prime examples and insights on the topic. That being said, I do understand your point that How I Met Your Mother is not known for having a "good" overall message to the viewers. Also, even though I am not thrilled that they got divorced, I do understand that it is a part of some people's life and it happens. Yet, I am not okay in the way in which their divorce was presented. It was not a major point, ("Major point"), in the final episode, while the whole focus on the final season was the marriage of Barney and Robin. I understand the view of people that are against this, and I know it was a risk for the writers to make this a part of the episode altogether. I simply think that they should have added more emphasis on the divorce rather than putting it as a side note in the hour long episode.