Noah's ark (from the biblical story) was real

First Read Genesis 16: 19-20 and Genesis7:2-3 In the original Hebrew the word beast and cattle is the same behemah witch means land vertebrate animals in general. The word creeping things is REMES in Hebrew which has a number of different meanings but here it probably meanings but here it means REPTILE. Noah did not need sea creatures because they could servive so they were not on the ark most likely. Now horses Zebras and donkeys are most likely (non evolutionary) descendants of from a equine(horse like) kind since they can interbreed although their ofspring are sterile. You have a major problem here. Zebras, horses, and donkeys, as you said can't produce fertile offspring but can reproduce. You claim that probably means that they are descendants of horses but not evolutionary descendants. If they were descendants in the same way as you are a descendent of your great grandparents then they should be able to produce fertile offspring but they can't which means that they are different species. Since they can't produce fertile offspring that means that they must have a different number of chromosomes, but if they are not evolutionary descendents then they should have the same number of chromosomes, but they do have different numbers of chromosomes. That means that they MUST be evolutionary descendents. It would also be impossible to get all the diverse traits in one animal that is carried on the ark because that much genetic information can not be stored in a cell.Same with Dogs wolves and coyotes are probably from a canine kind. Domestic cattle (clean animals for sacrifice) are descendants of Aurochs so there were probably at most seven( or 14) domestic cattle aboard. The Aurochs are may be descended from cattle kind itself. Tiger and lions can produce hybrids tygons and ligers. So it is likely that Aurochs are descendants from the same original kind.Again they are distinctly different genetically they have different chromosome numbers when they should according to the non-evolutionary descendant suggestion.Woodmorappa totals about 8000 genera including extincted thus about 16000 animals had To aboard. How could you fit a. Huge dinosaur on the ark? Well of the supposedly 668 dinosaur genera only 106 weighed more then ten tons when fully grown And the number of dinosaur genera is probably greatly exaggerated.Again your problem is that the genus is such a large classification that there is no way they could've evolved into the millions of different types of land animals we see today. Also evolution is the only explanation for how diverse life is. No matter what you say there is no chance that all the different animals within those genera aren't evolutionary descendents. Second there are 8.7 MILLION different species alive today. Noah wouldn't have had enough room on the ark. Third you have no evidence that the number of dinosaur genera is exaggerated and whenever a new genus is discovered it goes through boat loads of peer review. If there was any exaggeration it would've been caught a long time ago.The Bible does not say that the animals had to be fully grown the largest animals were probably represented teenage or even younger specimens. The medium size of all the animals on the ark would actually been that of a small rat according to Woopmorappes s up to date tabulations. While only 11% would have been much larger than a sheep.The ark measured 300"50"30cubits (Genesis 6:15) which is about 140"22"3.5 meters so its volume was 43500 m3 (cubic meters) Or 1.54 cubic million cubic feet. This is the equivalent volume of 522 standard American stock cars each which can hold 240 sheep. If the animals were kept in cages with the average size of 50"50"30 centimeters (20"20"12 inches) You not only have the problem of fitting so many animals on the ark but even if you somehow could get 8 pairs of every terrestrial animal on the ark many of those animals need a large amount of space to stay healthy. Heres a quote: a sable antelope or red hartebeest needs a crate of 57 cubic feet for the brief journey from capture to quarantine; a zebra, 77 cubic feet; medium-sized giraffe, 99; eland, 110; hippopotamus or small elephant, 214 (adapted from Hirst, p. 121). These seven species alone, male and female, require more than 5,600 times the allotment per specimen for a trip that rarely exceeds three days. For the 371 days of the flood, the area would need to be greatly enlarged—for crowding and lack of exercise would be extremely detrimental, if not fatal, to most (cf. Young, p. 137; Voss, p. 157). Many birds must have high roofs with room to fly, and even a pond snail needs a gallon of water for adequate living (Orlans, p. 85).So we've established that there are both major problems in the number of animals and the space required. Basically even if you could miraculously get every animal you need in there, there won't be enough room for every animal to stay healthy.This would leave room for 99 trains and 99 cars each for food Noah's Family and range for the animals.You still have a problem: carnivores. Most carnivores will only eat fresh meat; as in an animal they just killed. Now you not only have to get those 8 required pairs of animals but you also have to get enough live animals to feed the carnivores for a year. You also have to stop those carnivores from eating the other animals. Then you also need to get enough food for all the herbivores and some like an elephant eat hundreds of pounds of food every day. Now I'll do some math of my own. Noah had a family of 5 himself, his wife, and his three sons. So how much food would they need? Well the average human eats about 1 ton of food every year so if you extend that to five; Noah's family needs 5 tons of food for themselves. So obviously feeding everyone is infeasible.CONCLUSIONI have shown that the sheer number of animals alone on the ark is impossible. I have also shown that there is no way each animal could've gotten enough space and food. I have disproved cons argument about just taking an animal from each genus and his arguments about space and food. Noah's Ark contains an incredible amount of impossibilities. So there is no way the ark and the flood could ever have happened. Sources:http://ncse.com...http://ncse.com...wikipediaNote to pro: try using a non-creationist source they are INCREDIBLY unreliable. When I checked your source I immediately found tons of errors, misrepresentations, and simple denial of science.