BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
god is an immoral homicidal maniac

Oh but I have looked at your profile. I look at everybody’s profile when they accept a debate with me or sign off on some lunatic munchkin boombox sleigh ride that they can’t get out of when they post in the comments section to my debates. I DO NOT seek out to attack people as it is entirely up to people to post in my comments section and or sign up for a debate with me unless there is a debate that I simply cannot refuse to post on or debate on which does not happen too often. Purushadasa is merely a sweaty piece of rear end wipe with, obviously, no genuine friends or loved ones, as so many pathetic christians here are on debate.org, but they must like it that way as they do it unto themselves, and all they do is seek attention because they are so desperately lonely. Now did I ask you or anyone to come and visit my debates and leave your scars of stupidity? No I most certainly did not. So that one is on you and anyone that does. So don’t tell me I “attack people who aren't going to even bother you.”Ever watch The Atheist Experience? Perhaps you should. And I most certainly am not here to please you or anyone. Now if I make friends with what I have to say, great! As it has happened several times. If not, hey that’s perfectly fine. But I am not going to change for you or anyone. Also if you agree with the debates I set up, great also. And if not then that’s entirely YOUR problem. And if you don’t ;like it - leave. I---don’t---care. If you think its a stupid debate, then you utterly proved yourself to be stupid, uneducated and ignorant for signing up for this debate because god, especially according to the bible IS nothing but an immoral homicidal maniac.Oh and btw, there’s only 2 things I hate. 1. god according to the bible as he hates children + a whole lot of other things. 2. Those that abuse children. Now I REALLY could hate because I could tell you some true stories that would turn your soul black and then I would tell you about me. SummaryWhat you had to say in all rounds is sheer and utter stupidity and arrogance.
god is an immoral homicidal maniac

If you would check my profile at all, you would realize I agree with you on the part of the existence of god. However, I think it is stupid to stoop to a Purushadasa level in behavior, and attack people who aren't going to even bother you. This is a stupid debate. You aren't going to convince anyone that is a christian, and all you are going to do is turn them off to even discussing anything with an atheist. Have fun being angry at the world, I just hope you get out of this reverse apologist phase. I know I sure as hell have.
god is an immoral homicidal maniac

Since con has proved himself to be a moron, an imbecile and an inane swatted house fly that buzzes around his you know where areas looking for pus, this debate is now over and I declare myself the winner. The proof of god does not matter here as he does not exist. It is the mere belief in him that causes all these atrocities, pain and sufferings. And the rules were set up in which con did not follow. Nor did he look the verses up at all to prove that this god character according to the bible in printed text is indeed a genocidal homicidal maniac who could have, but didn't, bring in an era of peace. Con broke the rules and did not validate nor did he justify the killing of innocent babies, children and pregnant mothers for absolutely no reason. So he automatically loses. Wow he must be a sure loser in life with a truly gutted soul also. The end.
god is an immoral homicidal maniac

Indeed god is far far far worse than Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin, Hong Xiuquan combined. Here's some examples... 3,000 EX 32:27-28, 14,700 NU 16:49, 24,002 NU 25: 1-11, 12,000 JOS 8: 1-25, 10,000 JG 1:4, 120,000 JG 8:7-10, 42,000 JG 12:3-6, 1,000 JD 15:14-15, 3,000 JD 16:27-30, 25,101 JD 16:27-30, 1 SAM 4 34,002, 1 SAM 6:19 50,070, 2 SAM 8 65,850, 1 KI 20: 28-29 100,000, 1 KI 20: 30 27,000, KI 19 35 -37 185,000, 2 CHR 13 17-18 500,000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, 2 CHR 28:6 120,000, Esther 9:5-18 75,813 etc etc etc Yeah god is really so moral huh? There’s no such a thing as “love” within any genocide. Your job as Con will be to validate the killing of innocent babies, children and pregnant mothers for absolutely no reason whatsoever rather than bringing in an era of peace, love and harmony is justified.
god is an immoral homicidal maniac

Wow what a truly pathetic maggot that you are that clearly only seeks attention. I never stated you would forfeit this round. But who really cares as to why you even signed up for this debate in the first place for a more than reasonable debate subject and who really cares if a teeny boper like you likes it or not? Oh I get it... you signed up to merely p**s me off and for absolutely no other reason and you fricken know it. What a truly pathetic loser you are to do as such. And yeah because you did as such, you absolutely deserve to be insulted to the nth degree.
Rap contest (NO BOYS ALLOWED)

Hi I am shy and new to this sort of stuff please be considerate when critisising me thankks you !!!!! =) !!!!Me hope's you like! Weeeeeeee!-GETS INTO PIRATE MODE-ARRRGGGGGHHH!WENCHES AND MEAD IS ALL WE NEED!YO HO! YOUR WIFE'S A HOE!I'LL BUM YOU WITH MY CLIT AND STUFF YOU WITH SH-T!YO HO YOUR WIFE'S A HOE!IT'S A PIRATES LIFE WE LEAD! LESBIANISM? YES SIR INDEED!YO HO YOUR WIFE'S A HOE!WE SAIL THE SEAS AND SUCK D-CK ON OUR KNEES! BECAUSE WE LOVE D-CK IN OUR BUTTS CAN'T SEEM TO GET ENOUGH CUCKS. -BEGINS TO JIG LIKE A ONE LEGGED PIRATE WHORE-GOT A PEG LEG, USE IT AS A DILDO!GOT A MOULDY ARSE HOLE, THERE YOU'LL FIND WALDO! OHH IT'S A PIRATES LIFE FOR ME!C0CK IN THE ARSE C0CK IN THE GUILLOTINE,C0CK IN A VASEC0CK IN A PILOSWINE (POKEMON THING)OHH IT'S A FVCKING PIRATE LIFE FOR ME CVNT.Thanksy for reading my pirate rap =) YAAAAY!
It is espaniol, not castelono. I looked it up.

There are two words that could be translated as 'Spanish': Castellano: "Lengua espa"ola, especialmente cuando se quiere introducir una distinci"n respecto a otras lenguas habladas tambi"n como propias en Espa"a." (1) and: Espa"ol: "Lengua com"n de Espa"a y de muchas naciones de Am"rica, hablada tambi"n como propia en otras partes del mundo."(2) Castellano is used more when you when to distinquish it from the other official language of Spain (Catalan, Galician and Basque). Espa"ol is perhaps the more common term but both castellano and espa"ol are correct translations of 'spanish'. 1. http://lema.rae.es... 2. http://lema.rae.es...
Puppy mills should be banned.

Actually, there is already a black market for exotic birds and whatnot. Contraband purebred dogs isn't that far of a stretch. I'm referring to the fact that cremated animals is wasted biomass that we could have eaten. No country in the world has bothered to make a humane method of slaughtering dogs, but now Con has the mental image of dogs that would have been put down instead being re-directed to underground laboratories to be sacrificed in the name of science to find a humane method of snuffing dogs. It's assumed you accept the risk of horrible things happening to you every time you eat vegetables too. (eg e. coli) If those aliens take a look, they'll see. .. THIS: . https://1d4chan.org... (link NSFW, mostly because of profanity) They'd try to kill us simply because they're utterly terrified of us. Look at us from the perspective of those who want for nothing. We're insane enough to have enough WMDs to blow up our only world 20 times over, and treat that is a guarantee of peace among ourselves! Every other animal is rational. We rationalize, which means that we'll pursue doomed causes, and find they're not as doomed as everyone thought! Some among us blow themselves up to make a point! We have a range of industries about finding better methods of slaughtering each other, and treat it as everyday life! What do they think we'll do to them if they don't want to play ball, considering we treat our fellow humans like that? What makes you think that we'll treat them as anything more than a speed bump when we wreck their ship and loot their technology? Say hello to humanity, coming soon to a world near you, from your deciphered star charts, no less. All because you didn't say hello. This is our universe now. You foolish aliens just haven't realized it yet. Dogs are food, just like alligators, cattle, and people.
Puppy mills should be banned.

>Implying animal cruelty is bad. >Takes almost three days to stop laughing. Very well, we'll use your definitions... but considering the source you cited was the "American Society for the PREVENTION of Cruelty to Animals", you know what their stance is going to be on the topic. Admittedly, puppy mills AS THEY ARE NOW are wasteful. If they expanded into the sale of dog meat (No, really, the stuff's delicious.), then the unsold products (ie dogs) would not go to waste. Puppy mills are merely a production site for dogs. The mills and contents thereof (ie site and dogs) are property of the owner. Puppy mills are legal as they are now, but deregulating them would decrease the amount of suffering by allowing the dog meat to be sold as a food product, instead of an interim period until they are put down as we have now. Animals are property, and we need to make use of everything we've got to ensure a good future for us. Once we've done that, then, maybe we'll throw "not us" a few concessions if we feel like it and we don't stand to lose anything. And now, the case-by-case basis you have been waiting for. Claim 1 is inconsistent. It's either 3-4 million or 2.7 million, and no mention is made of how many cats and dogs were put down on the request of their owners because they were really old and had an incurable disease. Claim 2 is re-iterating Claim 1. Claim 3 assumes that animal cruelty is bad. You then go off on a tangent on how factory farms are cruel. The "animal cruelty causes human sadness" bit intrigues me. How does some people in the media higher-ups deciding what goes on the news with zero input from the general public save viewership ratings become "people caring"? Puppy mills should be further deregulated to allow for the sale of dog meat. I know for a fact that that East Asian cultures, a rising demographic in America, incidentally, consider dog meat a staple food, and liberal types love their multiculturalism. It would be politically incorrect to not let them have part of their heritage taken away. And now, some number crunching. 4 million at most in America are put down, then cremated, vs. 25 million worldwide, who are eaten, 10 million in China alone. We could export our unwanted pets to China, where they will be fed to the people making us the latest consumer goods. Source: http://www.independent.co.uk... (//With five minutes to spare! Go me!)
We must fight Christian extremests from making America a theocracy

Please show me this Huffington post article, I would really, really, really like to see it. Secondly, I go to a Catholic High School and we learn that the universe was created by the Big Bang, we don't learn creationism. Even in theology we learn the universe start from the Big Bang. Your arguement is invalid. Thirdly, you say we don't let Atheists hold office...what religion is Obama? He is Atheist! Oh yeah, and in my theology class they teach us that there is nothing wrong with being gay. Once again I think you are pulling these facts out of nowhere. We would also not kill those who worked on the Sabbath if we were a theocracy. Even in Jesus' times people were not killed for working on the Sabbath, after all Jesus worked and healed and preached several times on the Sabbath. Next piece of BS info you said, "What if a child who would find a cure to cancer was forced to believe evolution wasn't real?" First of all, evolution and and medical research are on two different branches of science, so already your arguement is invalid. Also, evolution is taught to be true in my Catholic school, by the church, and even by our church officials. Also, you claim that the church and state are becoming one. There is a major separation between Church and state. My Catholic school doesn't receive any grants from the state, so tuition is like 4,000 per student and yet Public schools get an 8,000 dollar grant per student. My parents have to pay taxes for the public schools, and pay tuition to send us to Catholic schools even though we don't go to public schools. If anything, they make it hard for us to get a Catholic education! Not to mention that Churches still have to pay property taxes. Also your final argument states "34% of citizens actually support us becoming a Theocracy" got any proof? I still want to see this article. None of my religious friends, teachers, or priests or even my pope want America to become a Theocracy so I bet that is just a load of BS Also, Iran is ran by an Islamic Theocracy. The Title of this debate is concerning a "Christian Theocracy" so using Iran as a comparison is invalid.
We must fight Christian extremests from making America a theocracy

"That's Catholic. The rest of the Christians go by the Bible, which says god created the world in 7 days." Well, just so you know my dad isn't Catholic. He is Lutheran. You know he doesn't believe the world was created in 7 days. I have a friend who is Jewish, he doesn't believe the world was created in 7 days. Also, Obama is considered Agnostic/non-religious since he a. never attends church b. he even admitted that he doesn't know if God exists or not. c. Yes it was wrong for me to call him atheist, but he is not Christian. He is agnostic if anything. Again, you are taught in Catholic School. Look what other Christians say about being gay: http://www.godhatesfags.com...... First of all, like I said before my dad is Lutheran, and my friend is Jewish. In both religions they are taught to respect gays. Your arguement is invalid. You seem to be saying that Catholics are fine, but the rest of Christians are not. I strongly disagree. No Christians are being taught to disrespect and hate gays. What we as Christians are taught is to love one another, love your neighbors, and remember that the Holy Spirit is in each and everyone of us. As Christians we disrespect no one (Although, sometimes we do sin, and in the past our leaders have too, no one is perfect) My next point in that article is that those who were interviews were asked if they wanted Christianity to become the official state religion, not if they wanted a theocracy. Ask around the question: "Do you want America to quit being a democracy and become a theocracy?" I asked around this question at my school, since this debate is for one of my classes :D. 21 of my fellow Christian friends responded "No" to that question. Even my religion teacher responded "No" I even asked my priest. Do you know what he said? "No." Not one person responded "Yes" You are obviously making up this theocracy thing to make people hate on us Christians, but it is not working. We as Christians believe in democracy. Pope John Paul II went to Poland where he inspired people to be free from Soviet rule. Soon they formed a democracy. Don't you see? Even our pope wants democracy! Thanks for the debate, I had lots of fun, and may God bless!
We must fight Christian extremests from making America a theocracy

OK...let's prove you wrong, one thing at a time: "Please show me this Huffington post article, I would really, really, really like to see it."http://www.huffingtonpost.com... "I go to a Catholic High School and we learn that the universe was created by the Big Bang"That's Catholic. The rest of the Christians go by the Bible, which says god created the world in 7 days."what religion is Obama? He is Atheist!"Sorry, wrong again...he's a Christianhttp://www.gallup.com..."Oh yeah, and in my theology class they teach us that there is nothing wrong with being gay. Once again I think you are pulling these facts out of nowhere."Again, you are taught in Catholic School. Look what other Christians say about being gay:http://www.godhatesfags.com... "We would also not kill those who worked on the Sabbath if we were a theocracy."If America was a Christian Theocracy, the laws would all come fro the Bible."For six days, work is to be done, but the seventh day shall be your holy day, a Sabbath of rest to the LORD. Whoever does any work on it must be put to death." Exodus 35:2 "evolution and and medical research are on two different branches of science, so already your arguement (sic) is invalid"Wrong again :)http://evolution.berkeley.edu...Like I said before, Catholics are the only Christians that go with science (Big Bang, Evolution, etc.) Catholics are only a part of all the thousands of Christian sects.Also, just because a church doesn't receive grants from the government, doesn't mean there's a "major separation between Church and state". I already told you how "In god we trust" is on our money and "Under God" is in our pledge. The entire list of how church invades State is in Round 2. Go back and read it."Also your final argument states "34% of citizens actually support us becoming a Theocracy" got any proof? I still want to see this article."http://www.huffingtonpost.com..."Also, Iran is ran by an Islamic Theocracy. The Title of this debate is concerning a "Christian Theocracy" so using Iran as a comparison is invalid."I used it to show that a country can, indeed, become a true Theocracy. If it's possible in Iran, it's possible here.
there are no rights or wrongs in ethics.

We are living in a society that must have laws and rules that everyone must follow otherwise punished. I honestly think that what people do to make themselves happy does not fall under their morals. However, I do think that what people think is right or wrong does follow their morals. Their morals must reach a threshold at one point or another. Yes, you don"t know what that person has specifically gone through, on the other hand they do have to understand that you cannot just do whatever you please whenever. Peoples beliefs do not fall under their morals. Their behavior and their way of living does. There is a point where things are right and things are wrong so there clearly has to be wrongxs and rights in ethics.
there are no rights or wrongs in ethics.

I see where you would think the world would go crazy if everywhere were to be free doing what they wanted or what they felt was right. But we're talking about still living in a world with laws and rules, but living in a world free of judgement on the decisions you make. It may sound cliche, but unless you've walked a mile in their shoes, you have no right to decide what is right or wrong for them. A single mother gets penalized all the time by people who believe a mother should never be single or have children out of wedlock. Yet, they have no clue that she might have been in an abusive relationship and left for the sake of the life of her children and herself. So I guess it goes back to unless you know what someone is going through in their life, your opinion is not needed nor is it right because you aren't in that situation. As previously stated in my first argument, what is right to me, might not be right for you. And what is wrong for me might not be wrong for you. It all comes down to what is best for us and only us.
there are no rights or wrongs in ethics.

Socially and morality are two separate topics that can combine into one. It may be socially wrong for someone to do something but morally it is right or visa versa. However, there always has to be a line drawn as a threshold. From my example from before how people need be aware that they need to follow the laws, because if a person thinks that it is okay to kill or steal then there needs to be something to prevent that and say that this is morally wrong. Some things might not be socially accepted such as if you were apart of LGBT or punishing your child in public. You should without a doubt live your life to your extent of being happy but if everyone got their way all the time, the earth as a whole would be a complete disaster. Morals are what people expect of one another and they can be positive or negative to other people. Also, each culture has different standards for morals and this is where we can decide what is right or wrong. There could be good or bad or right or wrong so therefore, ethics must have a right and wrong answer.
there are no rights or wrongs in ethics.

Yes definitely killing someone is not something that anyone should think is right. What you believe is right or wrong can go as far as whether or not you think discipling your child is public is right or wrong. Some people think that disciplining your child i public is perfectly fine whether it be a slap on the hand, a tug on the ear, or even yelling at them in the middle of the aisle. Yet, at the same time there could be a middle aged woman walking past, seeing this and thinking to herself," Oh my gosh what a horrible parent to punish her child in public. This woman was most likely raised by parents who either waited until they got home to do something about her behavior, or simply do nothing at all. So she grew up thinking that either you do it in the privacy of your own home, or you don't do it at all. But why should she call the parent a horrible one just because of the way she feels on the situation? That mother or father disciplining their child in public was probably raised the exact same way and thought to themselves," When I have children I want to raise them the same way they raised me." Or maybe, they themselves weren't raised that way yet they still wanted to raise their children that way. As human beings we sometimes forget to realize that everyone has different opinion then our own. A lot of times, mostly in this day and age we grow to be selfish and close minded at the fact that we're all living our own separate lives and living them how we want to live them. I truly do believe that if you live you're life by the morals of someone else you aren't living at all. Yes the laws the government sets for us all to follow should be followed at all costs, however when it comes to doing things in you're life that make you happy, you should be doing them. You should never be afraid to live your life the way you want to live it no matter how difficult you're circumstances may be. And you should make every decision with the mind frame that it was the best and right decision for you.
there are no rights or wrongs in ethics.

If you were without a home, living on the streets, and your life was on the line still does not give you a right to steal. You can"t always be selfish and you definitely need to think of others in a way that the people that you are stealing from work hard to make a living and to keep their business. Therefore, maybe the people who are homeless should try to raise their morals to what everyone else in society is doing. They should get a job and work to support themselves. Stealing in my opinion is the "easy" way out. I completely agree with the fact that people of the same sex should be allowed to marry show PDA etc also that men and women can cross-dress because that is who you are. Society may frown upon it but in order to be happy you definitely have to do what is right for yourself. But that isn"t talking about their behaviors in the way they act towards things. Now, if the law said that they were going to arrest anyone who is bisexual, transgendered, gay or lesbian etc. then that is where it is wrong. But that in case is the "freedom" we do have in this country. We do not get beaten, put in jail or a death sentence if we are anything but straight. However, the morals of yourself and family "should I do it or should I not" comes in major play when is comes to breaking the laws. How about the morals of killing someone because you don"t approve of them. That is when it is a true wrong moral and definitely shouldn"t be accepted.