Religion, Opponent chooses topic and states their side. Atheists or Christians welcome.

“Well, I wasn't expecting such a formal opponent, in fact its a bit hard for me to understand.” Thank you Con for those kind words, where I regret to say I failed in conveying my argument relative to Con's response. Many confuse morality as being some form of religious values, where morality is the instrument---a Law in Nature, which is responsible for creating all sets of values. Morality is not a “religion,” it is simply a binary state of positive-feedback (moral) or negative-feedback (immoral) relative to another's Unalienable Rights. In a group, morality is the agent, the genesis, the cause, during the evolution of traditions, beliefs, language, etc, the norms of society that defines a group and keeps a group together. Here is a simple example of a group of two, that is, my pet dog and I. When I come home from work my pet dog is happy to see me by the wag of his tail, a lick on the cheek, etc. That was a moral event, we both experienced positive-feedback. On the other hand, locking my dog in a car on a hot summer day with the windows shut, is an immoral event, for my pet will experience negative-feedback in the final moments of his life. As a result, the group of two has died. If I was successful by sharing this example, both Con and the ones who review this debate, will also sense the moral result of positive- and negative-feedback. Morality is part of the foundation in communicating feelings, for we are alone in sharing our experience in completeness. In the dog example, there was no reference to religion or any bible stuff. My efforts are focus on reading God's handwriting, not man's scripture. God's handwriting is, the Laws of Nature because I believe God created everything, and the scientific method is a way to come to understand God's handwriting. My argument has nothing to do with religion or the bible. My belief is a very simple concept.Of course Con will demand a proof of a God. To me God is just a feeling like love is a feeling, a positive-feedback feeling that is real to me when working with the Laws of Nature. When we discover and morally follow the Laws of Nature, God's handwriting, amazing things happen relative to technology, food production, medicine, etc. For example, the way I believe, the “invisible hand” in this short YouTube video, is the hand of God.www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYO3tOqDISEFrom that video, there are no human “masterminds,” just the “invisible hand” of God's handwriting via the moral spontaneous efforts of individuals, naturally organize into a complex order of economic activities. These activities, improve the standard of living, guided by morality, on the road to utopia. In our modern age, the scientific method has become inseparable from human endeavor. Since Morality is an outgrowth of Unalienable Rights, which is an outgrowth of the Constructal Law, which is an outgrowth of the Laws of Thermodynamics, it should be a subject of study in a science class. Bringing the subject of morality into a classroom, will help improve the moral fabric, keeping a society civil. Today, morality is the issue relative to the civil state of affairs across the human family's social spectrum. I feel the scientific approach to morality, may yield the best chance of reducing or eliminating war during the social evolution of humanity. For the Laws of Nature---God's handwriting are omnipotent, for both animate and inanimate are confined within the matrix of these Laws, there are no exceptions. As we used the Laws of Nature to go to the moon, it is time for humanity to use these Laws to crawl its way out of social darkness.