Fox News is the Worst News in the US

R2. Again, this issue is easily resolved, like I said in my last argument a point which MY OPPONENT DROPPED is that Fox is not saying "This image, yes the one right here on the screen is at this time and this location." That would be the bending of facts then. However, they never say this. They are indeed background images and background images only. Since Fox makes no statement about the background images how can you say the'yre biased or fact bending? Also, how does such an incident make Fox the worst news in the US?When someone is talking about 9/11 and they show an image of the towers, are they saying that news is happening live? Are they saying the person speaking is involved with the images behind them? No. They're just images. No statement of fact are made about the images being shown and therefore you cannot falliciously accuse them of bending the facts. "Again, sure Bill is just a political commentator, however, your right Bush didn't have anything to do with it, I apologize however it was a minor error and irrelevant." My opponent admits making this error. He also reaffirms that O'Riely is a COMMENTATOR. Media matters is bias. David Brock has is a liar journalist who hates Fox. How can the founder and owner of the site hate Fox and pledge to wage "guerilla war" agaisnt them and not be bias? [1] Also, MMfA has been accused of having tie to the president. [1] That's non bias right? He gets tips and pointers about conservaitives from a Democrat. Completely unbias. "He [David Brock - Founder of Media Matters] wants people, organizations, and companies destroyed." [1]My opponents next source (About the 15 year old boy case) shows how Fox acknowledged the fact that the boy was 16 and that someone had claimed they were 15 thuse remedying the problem. This source actually helps my case. Fox corrected the misinformation.Also, you can't prove someone DIDN'T say something, you can only prove what they said so saying "I showed he didn't say that" can't really be shown. You can't prove someone didn't say something. R3. This next section (again) is about media bias. Since I've repeatedly pointed out that all media is bias and since my opponent is hung up on proving that there is no liberal media bias (when there is) instead of proving that Fox's bias is worse than others all we have here is a frivilous argument about if the media is bias. The media is bias, in both directions. You can't say that Chris Matthew of MSNBC isn't bias just as you can't say Sean Hannity of Fox isn't bias. All news outlets have bias. Fox is no better or no worse than liberal views on MSNBC or CNN. He then falsely and naively says "Conservatives seek to control the media" an unfounded statement. Conservatives are content to keep Foxnews and talk radio outlets and in no way seek to control the media. There is liberal media bias. [2] [3] [4] Saying otherwise is naive and takes away from this debate.All news is bias in some way. Fox however is no worse than other news outlets and therefore cannot be cited as the worst news outlet in the US based on the claim of bias.FR. My opponent tries to claim that tabloids are satire and are therefore not news. This is absurd. The National Enquirer is printed as a fully functioning source of news. They do not claim to be satirical in nature and if you asked them if they were they'd be insulted. In fact, he helps to prove my point. The story he cites "JFK JR GRAVE ROBBER" is a great example of news that is WORSE than Foxnews. This is printed as news. It is sold and displayed as news. It is not satire. The paper prides themselves on being a source of news and as long as they claim to be a source of news we must take them at their word and consider their work news.My opponent claims I did not show proof that tabloids are worse news which only shows that they did not read my sources from my previous rounds. I posted a list of controversies and lies surrounding the National Enquirer that my opponent has chosen to ignore. It was posted in a previous round.Tabloids are news and are worse than Foxnews.Conclusion* My opponent ceded the fact that foxnews.com is a LEGIT and UNBIAS and ACCURATE source of news* Tabloids are a worse source of news than Foxnews* All media and news is bias, Fox being bias cannot be a factor in being the worse source of news because all news is bias* Foxnews aknowleges and corrects known mistakes Foxnews is not the worst source of US news.[1] http://communities.washingtontimes.com...[2] http://www.aim.org...[3] http://newsroom.ucla.edu...[4] http://theweek.com...