Thos who say "no WMD were found in Iraq are either Misinformed, or Prevaricators

Interesting launch. My task is simple: To prove there were WMD in Iraq before during and after the liberation of Iraq from the tyrant Sadaam. To begin, there must be a concrete, authoritative definition of WMD. WMD (or weapon of mass destruction) is a colloquialism for violations of U.N. Resolution 1441, which states: "Deploring the fact that Iraq has not provided an accurate, full, final, and complete disclosure, as required by resolution 687 (1991), of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than one hundred and fifty kilometres, and of all holdings of such weapons, their components and production facilities and locations, as well as all other nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to nuclear-weapons-usable material," This resolution is the final authority on what is and isn't a violation, or colloquially: "WMD". Any disagreement with this fact leaves the challenger with the burden of proof since "1441" was the justification for Operation Iraqi Freedom. Said disagreement also necessitates the challenger to produce and justify an alternative authority. Resolution 1441 is secinct in it's requirements, on what is and isn't a violation. For example:"3. Decides that, in order to begin to comply with its disarmament obligations, in addition to submitting the required biannual declarations, the Government of Iraq shall provide to UNMOVIC, the IAEA, and the Council, not later than 30 days from the date of this resolution, a currently accurate, full, and complete declaration of all aspects of its programmes to develop chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and other delivery systems such as unmanned aerial vehicles and dispersal systems designed for use on aircraft, including any holdings and precise locations of such weapons, components, subcomponents, stocks of agents, and related material and equipment, the locations and work of its research, development and production facilities, as well as all other chemical, biological, and nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to weapon production or material; 4. Decides that false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations and will be reported to the Council for assessment in accordance with paragraphs 11 and 12" Synopsis of this reolution: Turn over all your multiple death weapons (explains "weapons of mass detruction", and R&D projects you have, along with any peripheral accompaniments, or support material. This also includes "dual use" equipment, experiments, altered equipment, along with precise locations relating directly or indirectly to said weapons. Now that we've established the authorty of what is and what isn't a "WMD" the next step in the process is to certify the existence of said violations before during and after the removal of Tyrant Sadaam. I do find it interesting that the challenger went to great lengths to box the instigator of the debate into some type of retracted parameters for his facts. I think the honest reader will determine that the instigator has factual validation of his proposition: and will do so without parsing words. "1441" is quite clear in it's desired affect, and the violations are indeed the foundation for the war in Iraq, and removing said WMD. My intentions are to drive home the facts as stated above, then document the violtaions and establish a time line. The end result will be evident conclusion that those who say there were no WMD in Iraq will prove to be misinformed or liars.