In order to reduce unemployment and increase GDP, counterfieters should not be prosecuted

I thank Pro for not touching this: This means that through increasing the money supply, one can actually increase the Gross Domestic Production. I have now fullfilled my first burden, to show that an increase in the money supply will cause an increase in gross domestic production.GDP only counts for the "official" sum of all money made in the country for one year.- it does not take into account the 'black economy', which makes up 5-10% of the real GDP in countries like the UK or USA, up to 30% in Italy, and as much as 50% in Russia. This means that at equal "official" GDP per capita, Italy and the UK do not in fact have the same average income - it is maybe 15-20% higher in Italy, as fewer people declare the totality of their income.it does not take into account the accumulated wealth and assets, such as savings, investments (bonds, shares...), real estate properties and other material possessions. The GDP per capita would be a good way to compare citizens' wealth is all people were forced to spend all their income on perishable or consumable goods like food or clothes, and be left with no cash, no house and no other investment or long-term material goods (e.g. furniture, TV...) at the end of each year. Therefore A persons wealth does not count ALL of a person's riches. First off, CON states that "If you could make your money at home smoking a cigar and printing money would you work? Unemployment would go up" First off, unemployment is defined as those searching for a job. If I'm not actively searching for a job, I'm not unemployed, regardless If I have a job or not.No. people will not not if they can make money at their house. Thats not good.Second off, you assume that all persons would have the knowledge and capital necessary to print money. This is not necessarily true. Those unable to master the art of counterfeiting would work for a living.I had assumed that some print, but not others. I was thinking gangs and above the "25%".My opponent does not refute my arguments about sticky wages. His arguments are "If it is about money, don't take those jobs", "I dont think this has anything to do with some printing off money.", and "I'm not getting why this is important ". These statements don't argue anything. Extend arguments on sticky wages and prices. Wages and prices can remain the same even with a growth in the money supply.I know sticky prices. Onward.Ironically, my opponent then states "No. If Everyone gets more money why would you keep prices low? This is a Capitalistic society." This was the entire reason I wrote Point #1. I specifically stated why businesses will keep prices low even with an increase with the money supply. I stated that prices were sticky, or difficult to change. My opponent ironically asked "I'm not getting why this is important". My point was that prices remain the same due to sticky wages.Source? Prices do not matter. Have had bunch of candy? Yes? Would you be most likely to say ah "I got so much candy I think I make art.". The money value drops becoming a little worthless. So what? What about those who didn't print.Do you know what happens when theres a blast of money in a nation. Due to the equation MV = PY, if prices don't change in proportion to the money supply, then GDP increases. It's basic mathematics.Thanking for the source. I cant refute.My opponent then tries to explain the limits of GDP. That's nice. However, my arguments is to prove that counterfeiting will increased GDP. The limits of GDP do not matter in this context. Any arguments stating the limits of GDP is a distraction and a red herring.I tried to point out that not all of ones wealth count. You did not refute any part of that argument. My opponent has not responded to the following arguments:-The Philips Curve provides empirical evidence that demonstrates that as inflation increases unemployment decreases.I read that the P.C is outdated. http://en.wikipedia.org...I look forward to the next round. Thank you.