BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Preity Is Better Than Rani!!!

you said list one movie where rani had a bigger role than preity i can list many but for now heres one "chori chori chupka chupka." i think we should drop the topic about who has "natural beauty" ( becaause this is our opinion.) you said You Have No Proof That She Does Not! I HAVE NO PROOF OF WHAT?!try me. ill give you proof. you said Rani does Have Darker Skin Than Preity.And That Could Be Affective On The Natural Beauty Part. this tells me you are races to skin colr. lets say girl #1 is darker than girl #2 does that make girl # 1 ugly ( or you will say not AS pretty.) yes i do believe NO ONE IS PERFECT but do u see how rani has natural beauty. she was born like that and people appreciate her and preity had to get surgery to become prettier. rani won many awards also : her first commercial success with karan johar in "kuch kuch hota hai", filmfare best supporting actress award, saathiya 2002 which was commercially and critically successful, her hits in hum tum, she earned best acctress and best supporting actress in yuva and she was " THE FIRST ACTRESS TO WIN 2 MAJOR AWARDS IN THE SAME YEAR. "She received unanimous praise for her role as a deaf-blind girl in the film Black (2005), as well as many awards for her memorable performance, establishing herself as a leading actress in Bollywood." proof wikpedia i would love to continue bragging about hte best actress in bollywood but i know that would take up your time. you said i should admit That Rani Does Take Role That Do Not Fit Her. BUT THAT IS A BIG OPINION.
Preity Is Better Than Rani!!!

You Said: i didnt say rani is better than preity in kank because they're both in it. you said " preity is better then rani cause she is in kank" -Preity And Rani Were Both in The Movie So Lets Both Drop The Argument. You Said: it was the directors choice there are some moveis that rani has a better and bigger role and if they both have a big role then that would not be a very nice movie. - Plz Name A Movie That Both Rani And preity Are In it And Rani Has A Bigger Role. You Said: i did say she has "natural beauty" but if you want you can go to any of her sites and see not only me millions or even billions of her fans say that she has "natural beauty" -Same With Preity She has lots Of Website That People Say Natural Beauty to Preity To So Dont Think that Rani Is Better Bcause Of That Because Preity Has Websites Too. You Said: first of all don't be offensive of her color. - Why Not!You Have No Proof That She Does Not. Rani does Have Darker Skin Than Preity.And That Could Be Affective On The Natural Beauty Part. You Said: and rani doesn't want surgery because she is perfect. That Is Your Big Opinion.No One Is Perfect And That Means Rani Is In That Part Too.Rani Is So Not Perfect And That Includes Preity And Rani.NO ONE IS PERFECT. You Said: they wanted to make the movie a hit so they brought in rani mukherjee who looks fabulous with shahrukh khan. Than Why Did Preity Get A Jodi No. 1 Award First In 2004 For Veer Zaara And Preity Did All Her Work Alone And She Did Not Even Need Rani's Help.Preity Got It First Because Shahrukh Khan And Preity Zinta Look Better.AFTER 2 Years In 2006 Rani Won It.Why Did Preity Win It First Because She Rocks With Shahrukh Khan.Proof(imdb) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My Argument: You Should Admit And I Am Not Saying Only Rani That Includes Preity That Rani Does Take Role That Do Not Fit Her At All.Like Saawariya That Role That Rani Took Did Not Fit Her At All Because She Soo Did Not Look Good In It.You Have No Proof Bcause That Movie Was A FLOP.(Boxofficeindia.Com) In The Pepsi Commerical Part Rani Only Got One Commerical While Preity Got Up To Four.With Shahrukh Khan,Saif Ali Khan,Kareena Kapoor,Fardeen Khan. Proof ***(youtube.com) And (Imdb)*** Preity Got Nominated 9 times And Won The Best Actress Award 1 Time.
Preity Is Better Than Rani!!!

welcome back-- i didnt say rani is better than preity in kank because they're both in it. you said " preity is better then rani cause she is in kank" it was the directors choice there are some moveis that rani has a better and bigger role and if they both have a big role then that would not be a very nice movie. you said- In Kal Ho Naa ho Preity Was The Main Actress But Rani Cant Stand When Preity Is In A Film With Shahrukh Khan She Was Appeared In The Song Mahie Ve.Because rani Knows If I Dont Be In The Special Appearence The Movie Is Always A Succes So She Always Takes A Part In It And Preity Is Always In The Main Role. - where you there in the movie backstage or in rani's mind i dont think so so you have no proof. they wanted to make the movie a hit so they brought in rani mukherjee who looks fabulous with shahrukh khan. - i did say she has "natural beauty" but if you want you can go to any of her sites and see not only me millions or even billions of her fans say that she has "natural beauty" - you said - But Preity Has Hits And Flops And So Does Rani She Has Flops -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- first of all don't be offensive of her color. and rani doesn't want surgery because she is perfect. and she did not want to mess up her face like preity did. do not say you hate her because if i would have said that then ..... rani can stay in the sun as much as she wants.
Preity Is Better Than Rani!!!

Welcome Back! First of All u Said: -Just to remind you ,being in kank doent mean preity are all that. rani was also in kank. explain why ,if they were both in the same movie-Preity Zinta Was In Kank To So Dont think she was not because she was so Drop That Argument. U Said: -It doesn't necessarily have to be rani following preity it can be preity following rani.since you said rani follows preity can ou give me proof.-In Kank Both were The Main Actress. In Veer Zara Preity Was The Main One.But Rani Cant Say Anything. In Kal Ho Naa ho Preity Was The Main Actress But Rani Cant Stand When Preity Is In A Film With Shahrukh Khan She Was Appeared In The Song Mahie Ve.Because rani Knows If I Dont Be In The Special Appearence The Movie Is Always A Succes So She Always Takes A Part In It And Preity Is Always In The Main Role.And By The Way Preity Is Younger Than Rani Or I Could Say Whatever. U Said: rani is chosen more because as most people say "natural beauty.-That Is Ur Opinion That Rani And PEOPLE Say She Is Called Natural Beauty So There. U Said That: rani had one hit more than preity in 2004.-But Preity Has Hits And Flops And So Does Rani She Has Flops To Proof Boxofficeindia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yeah Maybe The Audience Do Like Them Together So Whatever.Some People And Not From my Opinion But People Do Like Her. I Would Give U The Names But It Will Take Up Time And U Might Not Even No Who They Are.Rani Does Not Have Dimple That Is Not Her Fault I Agree.When Almost Every Actor And Actress Preity Did Her surgery A Lip Surgery And Rani Did Not Because She thinks She Is Perfect Uhhh I Hate Her.Preity Is Better Because even Her Skin color Is Light Not Dark And That Is Her Fault She Needs To Stay Out Of The SUN.=D Ur Turn Rani Lover. Thank U Haso
Preity Is Better Than Rani!!!

hello, just to remind you ,being in kank doent mean preity are all that. rani was also in kank. explain why ,if they were both in the same movie. maybe the audience likes likes them together. it doesn't necessarily have to be rani following preity it can be preity following rani.since you said rani follows preity can ou give me proof. the faces could be the script (thats wat acting is all about) she may be with srk often ,(as in couple movies) but so has rani been with shahrukh khan.shahrukh khans words" they are both my freinds,and i cant decide." proof - kaun banaiga karorpathi in the B.O preity does the same as rani.absolutely the same. rani had one hit more than preity in 2004. in the last 3 years rani has been number one and preity has been number two.rani is chosen more because as most people say "natural beauty." it isn't rani's fault she wasn't born with dimples. rani has been in the industry foe 11 years and preity only 9. some of ranis hits are : BLACK (for those who haven't watched it ,it isnt racial it is when she is blind.), SAHIYA, HUM TUM CHALTE CHALTE,veer zaara, yuva, KKHH .in a poll taken at chakpak rani was voted 46.2 % and preity only 20.8. that is all i want to say now. THANK YOU
Preity Is Better Than Rani!!!

Hi! Preity Is Better Than Rani Because First Of All Rani In Kabhi alvida naa Kehna Rani Took A Very Bad Role.Yes I Admit In kank Preity Did Too But Not As Much as Rani She Did Like 2 Or 3 Times.In Veer Zara Preity Zinta Was The Main Actress But Rani Never Lets Her Do A Film Alone She Still Was In The Movie As Veer (Shahrukh Khan) His Lawyer.Rani Takes Very Bad Roles Sometimes Like In Hum tum And Kank ect... She Does So Admit It.During Her acting Rani Makes To Many Faces U Should Notice.In Her looks Preity Has A Beautiful Smile And Her Dimples.Rani Has A Good Smile Too But Not As Good as Preity.Everyone Likes Preity's dimples.And If u Say To Name It It Is Going to take me a while so i cant.Rani Is Respected to but preity is a little more she gets to stay with shahrukh khan more Proof Inter and outer world of Shahrukh Khan.
i the best type of pie

I negate that "Toll House pie with Cookie Dough[1]" is the best kind of pie. 1. No Warrant- You need not even consider my opponent's argument because he neither warrants, nor impacts his claim. Con's argument is nothing more than his opinion and he assumes you're going to accept it as truth. This is detrimental to debate, as no debate actually happens, the result is that debate boils down to nothing more than opinion. 2. Standard- By opponent claims that Toll House Pie with Cookie Dough is the best kind of pie, but he never offers a standard by which we can weigh such a term as "best". Does he mean Best Tasting? Most healthy? Best price? We don't know, and so clash, as well as constructive arguments aren't possible. 3. Hypocrisy- I ask you all to look at my opponent's avatar. He dons an avatar of Uncle Sam, father of justice and liberty. The very personification of what it means to be American, and yet he doesn't advocate the supremacy of Apple Pie. COMMUNIST! This blatant contradiction of ideals being presented by my opponent,is counter-productive to civilization, and the American way. A vote for the Pro in this debate, is a vote for America. Vote for America! = Sources Cited = [1] http://www.completelydelicious.com...
Ronald Reagan was a Better President than Andrew Jackson

My RefutationsAndrew JacksonMy opponent basically stated the pros and the cons of Andrew Jackson's presidency. In fact, he stated more negatives than he did positives, proving how bad Jackson's presidency was. My opponent's positives were:"-He attacked corruption in the federal government, which he distrusted.But he also helped prevent an early Civil War. In the 1830s South Carolina nullified a federal law and threatened to secede from the Union because of high tariffs. Though he wanted to send a large force into the state, Jackson prepared a modest force just in case while Congress worked out a compromise tariff."However, I already stated how bad this was. Jackson, who appealed to the common man in his elections, betrayed them with tariffs altogether. Not to mention, tariffs are bad for the economy anyway. Jackson was destroying economic growth."-Jackson was a strong supporter of the Union, influence that would be important to its cause in the Civil War 30 years later."How is influencing the start of the Civil War a good thing?"-He amplified the power of the presidency (which at the time was the weakest of the 3 branches), using the veto power a total of 12 times. His six predecessors altogether had used it 10 times."While the veto is a powerful tool, he may have destroyed some important legislation further hampering economic growth.ConclusionMy opponent acknowledged the negatives of Andrew Jackson's presidency. He never refuted my arguments on Ronald Reagan.
Ronald Reagan was a Better President than Andrew Jackson

if round 1 was just saying that i accept then i'll state my case again He's "complex." Positives: -He attacked corruption in the federal government, which he distrusted. But he also helped prevent an early Civil War. In the 1830s South Carolina nullified a federal law and threatened to secede from the Union because of high tariffs. Though he wanted to send a large force into the state, Jackson prepared a modest force just in case while Congress worked out a compromise tariff. -Jackson was a strong supporter of the Union, influence that would be important to its cause in the Civil War 30 years later. -He amplified the power of the presidency (which at the time was the weakest of the 3 branches), using the veto power a total of 12 times. His six predecessors altogether had used it 10 times. Negatives: -However, he introduced the National Spoils System, which threw out incumbent officeholders and replaced them with political supporters. As a result, people who cared little for the country and more about the rewards were in power. -He also destroyed the Second Bank of the United States. Like other westerners, he hated big banks. The National Bank was a great asset to the nation's economy and a Panic followed his two-term presidency. -He may have abused his power as President. -He was largely responsible for the Indian Removal Act of 1830 and the "Trail of Tears." This was actually supposed to be a noble move because he had adopted a Native American boy and did not want to simply wipe out the Native peoples. Depends on what you think: -His election represented the emergence of the common man in politics (universal white male suffrage in many states) and the westward movement of the political center of the nation (he was a rich gentleman from Tennessee). You could take this either way: the people were getting involved, or stupid people starting voting. -He basically founded the Democratic Party. (And the Whig Party, which grew out of opposition to his policies. The party was simply unified by the fact that "we all hate Jackson" but later reorganized into the Republican Party.) and of course i accept it if i'm typing for the debate
Ronald Reagan was a Better President than Andrew Jackson

He's "complex." Positives: -He attacked corruption in the federal government, which he distrusted. But he also helped prevent an early Civil War. In the 1830s South Carolina nullified a federal law and threatened to secede from the Union because of high tariffs. Though he wanted to send a large force into the state, Jackson prepared a modest force just in case while Congress worked out a compromise tariff. -Jackson was a strong supporter of the Union, influence that would be important to its cause in the Civil War 30 years later. -He amplified the power of the presidency (which at the time was the weakest of the 3 branches), using the veto power a total of 12 times. His six predecessors altogether had used it 10 times. Negatives: -However, he introduced the National Spoils System, which threw out incumbent officeholders and replaced them with political supporters. As a result, people who cared little for the country and more about the rewards were in power. -He also destroyed the Second Bank of the United States. Like other westerners, he hated big banks. The National Bank was a great asset to the nation's economy and a Panic followed his two-term presidency. -He may have abused his power as President. -He was largely responsible for the Indian Removal Act of 1830 and the "Trail of Tears." This was actually supposed to be a noble move because he had adopted a Native American boy and did not want to simply wipe out the Native peoples. Depends on what you think: -His election represented the emergence of the common man in politics (universal white male suffrage in many states) and the westward movement of the political center of the nation (he was a rich gentleman from Tennessee). You could take this either way: the people were getting involved, or stupid people starting voting. -He basically founded the Democratic Party. (And the Whig Party, which grew out of opposition to his policies. The party was simply unified by the fact that "we all hate Jackson" but later reorganized into the Republican Party.)
Does Christianity make sense? (Pt 2)

Thank you for your answer! I've asked a few Christians about this matter, and they all came up with some poor excuse about mysteries or faith. Your answer is a lot more accurate and believable. Anyway, here are two of my other objections: 1. Christians believe that God created Adam an Eve, and Eve fooled Adam into sinning. For this, Christians believe we have all inherited an evil nature that can only be forgiven with a sacrifice. So God sent his only begotten son to bear the burden of the sin for people, so they may be saved. Also, all of Adam and Eve's descendants bore the burden of a sin they did not even commit. Right? But Galatians 6:5 states: "For every man shall bear his own burden." Why didn't God take his own advice? 2. Christians believe Jesus was the only pure person at that time. So no other person would have done for the sacrifice. In Job 14:4 it says: "Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? No one." So if Jesus was born out of a human woman, and, being one of Adam's descendants, she was also sinful. So how could pure, clean being have come out of a sinful being? In my last debate on this topic, my opponent said that the Virgen Mary was not sinful, and was born pure. But, if we look at Job 14:4 again we can see that that is impossible.
Does Christianity make sense? (Pt 2)

I have been doubting Atheism for a while now, as I know that the world could never have created its self. Take DNA for example. It's like a book, a book for life. It's extraordinary; The most complex and detailed thing I know. So I ask myself: Who wrote this amazing book? Do I really believe a book wrote its self? I don't. So, therefore, I know that there must have been a God to write the book! I have many other objections to Atheism, and I don't feel as if its the right religion. I sort of feel like a magnet is pulling me away from the religion I was born into. .. It's complicated. Anyway, here is one of my objections to Christianity: Christians believe that God gave them the religious law to follow in order to live a good life and go to heaven. There are many Bible verses telling people to obey the law, such as this one: "And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is God; but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. " -Matthew 19:17 But this becomes bit of a problem, as Paul said the religious law is a curse in the book of Galatians: "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law. .. " -Galatians 3:13 "For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse. " -Galatians 3:10 So if Jesus said to follow the law, who is St Paul to call it a curse?
Does Christianity make sense? (Pt 2)

Hello, how are you? My name is Fede, I am a Catholic from Mexico, I like the fact that you are curious about these things and try to find answers! I do not have all the answers and just like you I ask questions and try to learn every day, so maybe I can help you a little bit, if not then we will both learn something new. First I am very curious about your story, how did you find out God exists? Why did you think about joining Islam or Christianity? And of course, the reason we are having this talk, what are your objections to Christianity? I hope you are doing great! Always stay curious! Fede
Does Christianity make sense? (Pt 2)

I am a teenager who is currently an Atheist (I belong to an Atheist family) But I know there is a God out there. I was somewhere in between accepting Islam or Christianity... But after my last debate, (Does Christianity make sense?) I think I've lost faith in accepting Christianity slightly, and I am slightly closer to accepting Islam. But if someone can answer my objections to Christianity were I cannot deny further then I will gladly embrace this religion. Note: This debate is not meant to be offensive! If anyone feels offended by anything I say them I'm really sorry, as I don't mean to hurt anyone.
"You Might Be A Redneck If" Debate

You might be a redneck if... You've ever barbecued Spam on the grill. You own all the components of soap on a rope except the soap. The best way to keep things cold is to leave'em in the shade. You've ever raked leaves in your kitchen. The neighbors started a petition over your Christmas lights. Your brother-in-law is your uncle. You entire family has ever sat around waiting for a call from the governor to spare a loved one. You go to the family reunion to pick up women. Your grandmother has ever been asked to leave a bingo game because of her language. You can't tell what color your car is because of the dirt
"You Might Be A Redneck If" Debate

You might be a red neck if 1. Jack Daniels makes your list of top most admired people. 2. You reuse your dental floss. 3. Your babies first words were, "marmy". 4. You can't tell what color your car is because of the all the mud. 5. Your wedding was held in the delivery room. 6. You pronounce oil and old almost identically. (oel, ol) 7. The most popular dinner table subject when guests are over is how well the fish are biting. 8. A plane flies over your house and you rush out side to look at it. 9. The antenna on your truck is in danger of breaking off whenever you drive under a bridge. 10. Your favorite pass time is competing with other boys to see whose phlegm spitting skills are better.
"You Might Be A Redneck If" Debate

Apologies to rednecks :) You might be a redneck if. .. There are more than five McDonald's bags currently on the floorboard of your car. Momma taught you how to flip a cigarette. There is a wasp nest in your living room. The Home Shopping Channel operator recognizes your voice. You give your dad a gallon of Pepto-Bismol for his birthday. There has ever been crime-scene tape on your front door. You burn your front yard rather than mow it. You consider a six-pack and a bug-zapper high-quality entertainment. Fewer than half of your cars run. You've ever been kicked out of the zoo for heckling the monkeys.
"You Might Be A Redneck If" Debate

And no offense to any rednecks that might be reading this debate! You might be a redneck if: 1. Each family reunion is like a massive buffet. 2. You buy tic killer for yourself as well as your dog. 3. Your mother keeps a spit cup on the ironing board. 4. You stand under the mistletoe at Christmas and wait for Granny to come bye. 5. You like the taste of crackle bread. 6. You're school class sings I wish "I Wish I Was in Dixie" before class. 7. You go hysterical when you get a pocket knife for Christmas. 8. All your clothes are home made. 9. Your don't know the difference between a TV and a PC monitor. 10. Your family all share the same tooth brush.
"You Might Be A Redneck If" Debate

Ok, we each post up to 10 redneck if jokes each round. Simple. Feel free to c/p your jokes. -------- 1. More than one living relative is named after a Southern Civil War general. 2. You think the stock market has a fence around it. 3. You think the O.J. trial was the big Sunkist and Minutemaid taste test. 4. You've ever lost a loved one to kudzu. 5. Your boat has not left the driveway in 15 years. 6. Your front porch collapses and kills more than three dogs. 7. Your coffee table used to be a telephone cable spool. 8. You keep a can of Raid on the kitchen table. 9. You've ever used a toilet seat as a picture frame. 10. Your home has more miles on it than your car.
should we wear uniforms or not

My opponent is incorrect because people can still wear jewelry to show off they're richer than the other person and still yet brag about it. In addition, it will not show that everyone is equal to each other, I repeat, it will not show EVERYONE is equal to each other because some schools do not have to have uniforms, so they are not equal to the school that does have uniforms.Thank you very much for reading this and vote for me.