All religions and philosophies stem from either Christianity or Satanism

Let me point out however, that my opponent went a bit off topic throughout some parts of his argument, so not everything he has put forth needs to be addressed. ============= Atheism and Satanism ============= The following is my opponents list of 'beliefs' atheism takes from Satanism: >>Evolution (by attempting to use science to prove it) This is false. The theory of evolution cannot be attributed to Satanism. It is a scientific theory originating from a scientist who had nothing to do with Satanism. Also, nowhere in the tenets of Satanism or the Satanic Bible will you find anything about evolution; and even it if it were, the theory of evolution predates the form of Satanism you are referring to (LeVeyan, which ironically borrows from atheism, not the other way around. ) >>Big Bang (by attempting to use evolution to prove it) Again, this is false. The Big Bang theory cannot be attributed to Satanism nor is it a tenet or belief in Satanic teachings. You also assert that evolution is used to prove the Big Bang which is an entirely absurd notion. They have nothing to do with eachother, not to mention the fact that the theory of evolution would not even apply until after the Big Bang happened. >>No God, or a godless foe like Satan (by attempting to use the Big Bang to prove there is no need for God, therefore reasoning to them selves that there is no God) The assertion that there is no God is exactly what atheism is, and any Satanic sect that doesn't believe in God is merely borrowing from atheism, not the other way around. Another point is that you are completely ignoring all the theistic Satanist sects like the Temple of Set, Church of Azazel, Joy of Satan, Gnostic Luciferianism, etc. which all believe Satan is God or they believe in multiple gods. These Satanic sects actually have much older roots than the form of Satanism you are referring to and they are completely incompatible with atheism. You only focus on the popular version of Satanism which was formed recently in the 1960s that admittedly borrows from atheistic philosophers. As you can see, I have just demonstrated that atheism does not borrow from Satanism, and to quite the contrary, the form of Satanism he is referring to actually admittedly borrows from atheism. His premise was incredibly flawed because not only was he unable to show how atheism borrows from Satanism, he wasn't even able to describe the tenets of Satanism correctly and gave them false attributes. Also, the majority of the Satanic sects actually believe in god or many gods which is completely contradictory to my opponents thesis. ============== Atheism and Christianity ============== The following is my opponents list of 'beliefs' that atheism takes from Christianity: >>Science (science has no boundaries/limits inside the universe, however it has one large boundary, that being it can not explain where it science it's self came from) Science is in no way rooted nor associated with Christianity, and if anything, completely contradictory to it. It is an absurd notion that science is a part of Christian theology. >>Morality and immorality (morality and immorality has no boundaries/limits) Morality and immorality did not come from Christianity. The very fact that many religions existed before Christianity with their own set of morals disproves this. Also, atheism is a position that doesn't even deal with morals. Most of the morals that atheists have come from philosophy. >>Knowable truth which leads to an eternal being (through science atheists attempt to find truth, which can only be eternal) This doesn't even make sense. You're claiming that atheism borrows "knowable truth" from Christianity, but you're making several false assumptions. That truth is inherent in Christianity and Christianity only, and that these Christian truths are borrowed by atheists. You try to tie it together by saying that since the Christian truth leads to eternal being, atheists are doing the same thing by finding truth, which by chance happens to be eternal. This is an attempt at making a connection where no link is present. Christians seek to be eternal; atheists seek truth, which happens to be eternal. Becoming eternal, and learning eternal truths are not the same thing. Therefore atheism does not borrow this specific concept, nor is the ultimate truth anywhere to be found in Christianity, let alone being an inherent trait. ******* I will now address some of my opponents other points. >>Atheism is a religion. .. Atheists aim to please God by searching for a God, searching to please God in their own way. Since religion is not a relationship but a motive to please higher beings or which just consists of faith, like evolution, atheism is therefore a religion. << Everything stated here is a complete fallacy. Atheists don't try to please God because they don't believe in God. Atheists don't search for God and find the existence of a such a self-contradictory being impossible, thus providing no reason to search for God. Religion is not just a motive to please higher beings, and even if it were, atheism most certainly would not qualify as one. >>[Satanists] believe that science does not exist but instead magic, for instance, if you rub your hands together it creates heat, due to the friction caused by molecules moving fast. In terms of magic you could say that one event takes place after another continuously for no explainable reason. I will talk more on this based to the fact that the Big Bang and all physical matter in the universe arose from nothing, this also implies to evolution. Considering that luck in Hebrew means 'good Lucifa' you can see why (if a believer in Satanism) things just happen. << This is a complete and utter misrepresentation of all forms of Satanism, and really doesn't even make sense. >>Satanist's do not approach morality to any extent, therefore consider evolution as a fact. << This is completely false and illogical. First of all, evolution has nothing to do with morals. Secondly, the Satanic Bible has more good morals than the Holy Bible. The Satanic Bible is centered around several great philosophers which deal with morality extensively. As a matter of fact, the Satanic Bible has ZERO! cruel and violent passages, as opposed to the Holy Bible's 907 cruel and violent passages. [1] >>Christianity is loyal to science<< Christianity is most definitely not loyal to science. Science is Christianity's biggest threat. The Bible defies science (no, I'm not talking about 'demonic' evolution; I mean real science) approximately 340 times. [2] ******* In conclusion, my opponent only addressed atheism and failed to explain how other religions borrowed from Christianity and Satanism. If he were to study ancient religions, he would soon find out that both Christianity and Satanism borrow completely from ancient pagan religions and astrotheology. [3] [4] Christianity is not the oldest religion, and because of this fact, it is impossible for the ancient religions to have borrowed from Christianity. The following religions predate Christianity: Sumerian, Egyptian, Babylonian, Druidism, Zoroastrianism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Confusianism, Taoism, Judaism, Sikhism, Jainism, Shintoism, and various other pagan religions. Therefore, it is impossible for these religions (many of which have their own creation myth; so calling Christianity the first religion because of Genesis is invalid) to have borrowed from or be based on Christianity. [1] . http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com... [2] . http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com... [3] . http://www.pocm.info... [4] . http://www.jordanmaxwell.com...