THBT Parent should have obligation to send their children to inclusion school

Ok, first I will rebut all point what con said in the 3rd round. 1. look, the children disability need 2 things in school. There are education and social. So, con can't said that inclusion school and 'special school for disabilities' give same effect. If con understand about system in Inclusion school, he should know that the mechanism education in inclusion school and 'special school' is different. And automatically give different effect. In inclusion school, like what I said before there are 2 curriculum. First is curriculum like normal people and the second is special curriculum for their self. But, in 'special school' just give one curriculum that is special curriculum. It means, 'special school' only give special education but not same like education for normal people. And 'special school' not give education social to live in real environment they are like isolated from environment out there. Ok, maybe they learn it, but just theory without do it in the reality. So, it's not effective. In the school, they just interaction with same environment and content of that's environment are some people like teachers, student who has disabilities. But, in inclusion school, they get special education for themselves, also get education like normal people and the important thing is they learn social education with direct. They interaction with normal people in the real environment and this is 'IMPORTANT' education for them. So, con can't said that inclusion school and 'special school' can accomplish same thing and has same programs. Because clearly, my argument about difference between inclusion school and 'special school' based on the fact not assuming. well, in this point con totally wrong. Like what I said in the 2nd round and 3rd round that The point is 'Build Tolerance each other." 2. So, if con read all my arguments with focus, his assuming about "inclusion schools are the only means to achieving such things is baseless." is totally wrong. That is clearly based on the fact. I already give you fact that happen in Vietnam. And inclusion school there was success made children with disabilities can more mingle with normal people in the real environment. But 'special school' not given this for children because they only feel in small environment (Not real environment). 3. con said that "children with physical disabilities that literally depend on others." But I think, con didn't understand what I said in the 3rd round "And don't forget that the children can't always depend to their parents. Parents also should let them and guide them live independent to be people in the real environment as people that had the same right with normal people." I mean is independent for join in the real environment not about treatments for them. We all know that people who has disabilities need good treatment. But unfortunately, con misrepresented Word 'Independent' it self. The children who has disabilities can't always depends other people for choose or do something. Simple example : To join and introducing with normal people, the children can't always ask their teacher to help them full. But, they should do this on basis of their willingness and try to do that with their self. With notes, the teachers still guide them. So, the mean of Independent like what i said in the 2nd round, Independent Living does not mean that we want to do everything by ourselves or that we do not need anybody or like to live in isolation. Independent Living means that we demand the same choices and control in our every-day lives that our non-disabled brothers and sisters, neighbors and friends take for granted. We want to grow up in our families, go to the neighborhood school, use the same bus as our neighbors, work in jobs that are in line with our education and interests, and raise families of our own. We are profoundly ordinary people sharing the same need to feel included, recognized and loved. 4. My limitation here is very clearly : Inclusion school in sub-types regular inclusion and in premiere school. In the 2nd and 3rd round already give you the reasons. First, because regular inclusion more better than full inclusion because in the regular inclusion, they still get special treatments after school hour. And the second about primary school. In debate, Pro has right to give the limitation for make this debate more focus to what problem it is. Unfortunately, this problem give different influence in each stage (Elementary, middle or high school). And in this debate, I can give you a limitation in primary school because will give different influence between problem will happen in Primary school. Because premiere school is the first stage to build good characters for children and also education that give in this level not hard. the right times not too early or not too late to try join in the real environment. Con said that "Pro also states that students with special needs get treatment after school hours, yet in the programs we have in modern America, these children will receive special treatment during all hours of the day." Well, I want to tell you that is the good point in inclusion school. Like what I said before, after school hours they get special treatments (other curriculum). In this curriculum, teacher will teach special education the children who has disabilities that relevant with 'disabilities' it self. So the eduction in the second curriculum is depends what kind of disabilities it self. Unfortunately, con didn't explain more what kind of special treatment during all hours of the day in modern America. In modern America, Special treatment like what? Well, that's a silly thing because I already answered it before, about why they had 2 curriculum for the children with 'special needs'. Unfortunately, Con gave not clearly about the information. So, con failed to rebut my argument about "special treatment." 5. If con said about class division for children disabilities, every inclusion school has each provision about class division. Because every country has different provision about that. In Indonesia, provision about class division is one class for all subject. So, it's not a problem. Because the important thing is school can handle it and learning process is going well. And then about accept 2 student with 'special needs' to inclusion school. Generally they accept 2 students. But if your problem is 'so many children disabilities in country', that is silly thing. Government should pick minimal 1 school in each region to be inclusion school. What con talk about this point is not important! The important things in this motion is parent should send their children to inclusion school. And remember, every country has different provision. 6. About Justification. What I said in the 2nd round about justification is logic because make sense. I talk about human rights. Unfortunately, con didn't rebut although 1 thing about human rights like what I said before. Because, the illogical thing : Their rights reduce or even written off. From the 2nd round until the last round, I already gave you all logic argument and based on the fact with prove cases that inclusion school was success in some country and this time is turn to make this also success in other country in the world. Unfortunately, con sometimes talk about assuming not based on the fact, the silly thing is talk us about his personal experience without give the prove and more explain and con DIDN'T TOLD US CLEARLY ABOUT THE SOLUTION so I presume that con try to refuse inclusion school without the best solution. Conclusions is Inclusion school is the best solution for children who has disabilities. So, I believe that if parents send their children with disabilities to inclusion school, it will give them better education than in special school. And with this, no more discrimination, no more reduce their right, They get same right like us and they will life harmony with us in the real environment. That's enough from me. Thank you :)