World Government will Impede the Progress of Humanity

World government will inhibit competition and therefore limit human progress: The Roman poet Horace once said: "adversity has the effect of eliciting talent which in prosperous circumstances would have lain dormant". While analyzing the conditions under which Western Civilization gave birth to scores of genius minds, renowned professor Niall Ferguson proposed the "six killer apps", of which competition is foremost. He wrote that our high standard of living today was largely in part due to the competition between the European states. The European spice race led to growing markets and innovations. While China, having been closed from the rest of the world by Emperor Qianlong, stagnated. The launching of satellites, the evolution of the Ethernet to internet, and the advent of the mobile cell has been propelled by the Space Race between the United States and the Soviet Union. The emergence from the dark ages into the Italian Renaissance would not have occurred if it was not for the bickering Italian nobles and families, which led to patronage and the accumulation of talent. This is backed by H. Taine in his work on "The Philosophy of Art in Italy". Establish a World Government, and you lower competition and inhibit the human progress. Bureaucracy: The world government increases risk of dictatorship/bureaucracy and loss of human rights. Adolf Hitler was democratically elected as Chancellor and then later became Fuhrer. Unlike Adolf Hitler though, the usurper would not have opponents in other world leaders such as Franklin Delano Roosevelt, as this is the world government. All it takes is one fanatic to degenerate the world into darkness and chaos. Economic Inequality: Winner of the Nobel Prize in economics Joseph Stieglitz warned America of the dangers of inequality in his book "The Price of Inequality". Dissensions and discord will inevitably arise out of inequality, as they do today in America. Certain people of the Texas state (one of the wealthier states in America) have already spoken about leaving the United States. The schism between the people of the poorer Main Street and the wealthier Wall Street has grown. What is the implication of third-world countries joining the richest countries in the world? The inequality, as one can imagine, will be unbelievably high. The Economist reported that in America 5% of the share of the national income goes to the top 0.01%. But in America, even many of the lower class citizens can afford to watch television. While in Liberia, most people cannot afford clean drinking water. The citizens of the once third-world country will rally against their much wealthier compatriots if they will not share their wealth. But if the richer citizens will have to take responsibility of the poorer ones, they will grumble and complain and threaten to separate from the world government. Cultural Barriers: Cultural barriers will prevent the successful integration of communities in to the world government. People will inevitably be more interested in the affairs of their region, and not the entire world. Schisms between people will inevitably be present and grow as the years progress. Regions will threaten to separate, as Quebec threatens to leave Canada today, or as Tibet threatens to leave China. Different preferences of governance will threaten to divide the people even further. This is demonstrated by Taiwan"s wish to leave Greater China. The Systems Underlying the World Government will Favour One "Region" Over Another Just as the United Nations today favours countries, (e.g. the United States) the system underlying the world government will inevitably favour certain regions as well. Richer countries will demand more privileges. Over time these privileges will lead to dissension among different regions, causing division among its people. Resources: H. Taine - Philosophy of Art in Italy Niall Ferguson - Civilization The West and the Rest Joseph Stieglitz - Freefall Joseph Stieglitz - The Price of Inequality