Presidential Debate - Airmax1227 VS Larztheloser

Airmax does so little that he has time to post very frequently on the forums, and doesn't even do anything worth mentioning in a given fortnight, and yet he protests that his duties are so burdensome that he can't debate. Airmax is not an infrequent debater due to the presidency - his infrequency of debating long predates his gaining office, and his record proves that.Airmax deliberately posted his reply very late to make it near-impossible to finish the debate before the vote period ended. He's trying to keep people in the dark. He hasn't announced any major policies. His previous policies have all been lies or failures.TournamentsMy opponent agrees with my policy of reducing the number of tournaments. He puts the onus on Juggle to provide recognition rather than coming up with a way to do it himself, like I did. Rather than make any changes he blames the community for all the success or failure of tournaments. It's not our fault tournaments suck - it's Airmax's.He ignored my warnings about too many tournaments long before he finally admits he was wrong. I've come up with the strategies, it's just that Airmax refuses to implement them until he's tried all the wrong permutations. I'll give Airmax credit for attempting to create a variety of tournaments, but they've been a variety of bad tournaments.Until presidential tournaments planned and run by people that know how to run debating tournaments, they will continue to fail. Still Airmax asserts that he is the best candidate to have overall control over them. And Airmax has given no assurance or reason why experienced debaters will start doing tournaments again, or why beginners will start getting something useful out of them.VotingI challenged Airmax to tell us what he has been doing to improve voting. In reply, Airmax ignored/dropped my entire section on voting. He had no response to my awesome ideas for improving voting on this site. It's clear that Airmax is a candidate for whom voting is not an important issue, despite the shocking state of voting on this site as I described last round.RL integrationWith voting Airmax ignores me, with this and with tournaments he tells me that I'm absolutely right. In other words, most of Airmax's platform is plagiarised from mine (given that he hasn't actually given us any reason to vote for him yet). He on several occasions promised to make policy announcements regarding various things. None of them has he followed up on.BullyingI want to know what about the current environment actually tells us cyberbullying is not OK. Airmax's solution for combatting cyberbullying online has invariably been wagging his finger at known cyberbullies. He claims my solution isn't possible but gives no evidence or reason to believe this to be true.In court, where privacy is an issue, things are redacted or reported in a very sensitive way. I'm all for privacy but a blackout is another thing entirely. Airmax's excuse for breaking his promise is that he doesn't want to pander. In that case he wouldn't be doing things like town hall style chats and debates with his opponents.Airmax has not responded to my other issues with his handling of bullying, such as favoring banning over trials.The vote thread is here: http://www.debate.org... . I hope I can count on at least a few votes for a better vision, a better policy and a better direction.