Atheism

There are many scientific proof of the Big Bang. The fact that the universe is slowly expanding is one major proof. For something to expand, it must've been squashed together initially into a very dense "singularity", and the rapid eruption of this singularity caused the Big Bang, and hence, why our galaxy is still expanding even today. For more evidence, head on to : http://www.schoolsobservatory.org.uk... Another thing I have to say regarding God is, if He indeed does exist, why the heck was he so active last time, and now, he's barely existing? Like, you see him creating all these miracles, all types of prophets, non stop revelations. But now? I don't see miracles that happened frequently back then. Did God slowly back off the more science developed? Hmm... Why, though? I have an explanation for this. The more science develops, the more mysteries are explained. What people deemed as the wrath of God was soon explained to be seismic waves, which in turn causes earthquakes. What people deemed God looking away, and required humans to sacrifice and make noises to "awake" the sun God, is soon explained as an Eclipse. Back then, when faced with a dilemma which no one can solve, what easier way to dump the thinking away by just explaining it as "God's will"? Oh, sudden deaths of people? Someone sinned! Today, though, if many people starts dying, doctors would call it an epidemic. So, as science slowly solves the mysteries, God's powerful miracles and signs soon disappears, as signs that used to be supernatural became... natural occurrences. After reading that article of yours, all I can say is it doesn't make a good argument, at all. It offers only three options. That's a limitation on its own. Just because you scratch off two of your answers doesn't make the third the only answer. Following the logic of the website, would it mean that if someone ask me what 1+1 is, and if I think it's either 3, 4 or 5, and I manage to show that it is neither 3 nor 4, does that mean the answer is 5? Obviously not. Hence forth, that argument is totally invalid. Just because people think Arabs are all those, doesn't mean everyone is that way. It's just stereotyping people into groups, just because the majority acts this way. If a new race, called the Examplerians, consisting of four people against abortion, and 1 person for abortion, is it write to say doctors of the Examplerians' race would never allow the act of abortion, since Examplerians are totally against abortion? What about that 1 dude that would do it? Just because the majority treats women like animals, worship idols, and drinking, doesn't mean everyone does. If this logic work, Noah would've been wiped off too, since most of the people were already sinning, so might as well wipe everyone out right? Since I've shown that not all Arab might've been against this, so the argument used to show that the Quran was inspired(No Arabs would write this, blahblahblah) is proven false. Sure, Mohammed could not write. Doesn't mean he can't speak. Take St. Paul of the Christian faith for example. He used Timothy as his scribe, as he dictated his epistles for the rest. It doesn't have to be Mohammed who writes it; just has to be his idea. I've shown that the logic used by the website is wrong, the Arabs might've written the Quran, and even showed that Mohammed could've just dictated what he want written to someone else. P.S. I'd prefer if you give me a summary next time instead of just dumping the whole website on me.