President Barack Obama has done nothing to deserve the praise he gets

I've enjoyed it very much and look forward to perhaps some future debates with him. With that being said I shall begin. 1:A) okay so when we look at my opponents responses in the last round he reiterates a lot of the same points he made in the previous round. Basically what we have to understand when looking at the unemployment rate, obviously what caused that was the Great Recession! Since my opponent did not address that we have to assume he concedes that. Now I provided an article showing that the Recession was a result of bad economic policy put in place by previous administrations (Bush & Clinton) and this also went undisputed, once again meaning he concedes to it. Quite frankly this means two things, one that I've shown him that it was not the fault of Obama, and two that he did not read my last rounds posting because he missed that point and is misconstruing the entire sub-point. 1:B) My opponent didn't respond to my defense against his attack so my point once again stands. So we have to see that this is going to be a major contributing factor because the growth of GDP is vital to our middle class, gives our government more spending room, and slows down inflation. 1:C) Now this point went completely unaddressed by my opponent the entire round. This is in fact one of the most important sub points I provided as well. The Fair Pay Act helped every woman across the country get equal pay for equal work. That's just something that our country should stand for anyways. The fact that it was a problem in our country doesn't make us look to good. However, thanks to Mr. Obama and his administration this is no longer an issue for over 156 million women. 2:A) This is definitely been the main focus of my opponents side in this debate but quite frankly what my opponent is trying to do is cross-apply two studies. Now one of those studies is giving the highest estimate of people who could become uninsured, and the other gives you minimum number of people who will gain insurance. That's honestly ridiculous considering the Washington post article that he also cites says at most 15 million Americans will receive health insurance cancellations. While 25 million will gain health insurance. Now considering Fox News is a bias conservative source I'm going to weigh his Washington Post article considerably more in today's round. You as a voter should too. -He then attacked my link saying its false and that news is saying all these different things. However I find it interesting that he didn't provide me a single piece of evidence for such an extraordinary claim. The burden of proof is on him for such a broad claim such as that and so I'm not going to even take note to that. 2:B) My opponent only stated that because it's not in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights that it's not a human right. However, interestingly enough it is in the UN Declaration of Human Rights. I cite Article XVI (16) (1)Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State. -You can see the article itself along with the entire declaration at; . http://www.un.org... Also take note that in the last round I stated that Obama does not have a huge praise. He has an approval rating of below 50% and many estimates say that his approval rating will only decrease from now until 2016. Really we can see he doesn't appeal to as large a number of people as perhaps Pro believes. Conclusion: In 1:A) I showed the Great Recession was the cause of the high unemployment rate in our country which started during Bush's presidency with evidence that went undisputed. My 1:B) defense went undisputed which means he concedes to the defense which means the point stands. Also 1:C) went completely undisputed by my opponent in all the rounds. This shows obviously once again this point stands. I showed how vital that bill was for over 150 million woman and thus should be weighed very heavily in today's round. As we can see two of my economic sub-points went completed undisputed in the final round, one the entire debate, and my first sub point stands for the reasons and evidence I've provided, showing I have overwhelmingly won the economic side to this debate. Social Benefits as a result of Obama's 6 years in office show once again how beneficial Mr. Obama has been to our country. In 2:A) I showed that his evidence from Fox News states the highest possible number ever, and that his other article completely disagrees with that 80 million number. I found it comical at how much the two articles disagreed because they both contradict each other but considering one is a completely bias conservative article I'll value the Washington Post article which actually reaffirms my own position. In 2:B) my opponent stated that marriage is not a human right because the UN Declaration of Human Rights did not say it is, however when we look at it in Article 16 it actually does say marriage is a human right so this point stands as well. Really we are seeing my entire second contention stand. Once again I thank my opponent for a lively debate, and for the reasons above I urge a Con ballot. Thank you.