Biblical Young Earth Creationism is scientifically probable.

I will break down my opponent's text paragraph at a time: "My opponent has stated in his stated in his first argument round that i could change the definition of creationism and so i did i consider god to be energy and i stayed true to my defenition of creationism since even my opponent has considers energy to be real my opponent tries to escape his own laws but he has stated that i can change the defenition of creationism and i did. " I did indeed state that you could change the definition of Creationism. I also stated that:"Unless anyone thinks that this definition [of God] is inherently flawed, this is not a debatable definition. " You never stated that you wished to change this definition, indeed, you even called it "point 4" and stated "Point4:no objections" Therefore, I can safely extend my refute that my opponent merely changed the definition of God (which was against the aforementioned rules) and effectively proved the existence of energy. Nothing more. My opponent offers proof that age is relative: "imagin that you would leave earth to a planet where time pased with half of the speed it passes on earth and you woul stay there for 2 days. if you returned to earth for the people on earth you would have grown older 4 days but for you it would have been to 2 days. If you were 60 here on earth you would bee 30 years there on that planet. your age would be relative. " This does not show how age is relative; this shows how your body clock can be slowed down. Your age would still be x, and it doesn't matter where people are in the Universe relative to you; you would still be x. Of course your body clock could delay you aging (in a regard), but your age would still be set. It's like a speeding car. You can go at all different speeds and ways, but it's still a car. My opponent has not shown how age is relative. My opponent considers Eden a place where the first two souls were. But this does not mean that he proves Eden by proving souls (which I'll come onto); my opponent still has to show how they were in Eden and not on Mars somewhere. My opponent considers your soul to be electrical impulses. Since he is allowed to change his definition of Creationism (not God which he invalidly did); then my opponent considering brain energy to be souls is fine. Therefore, if my opponent considers this to be souls, I'll consent that to him. Souls (brain energy) do indeed exist. Well, that was my opponent's response and (due to my refutes) still failed to adequately prove the following:God exists. The Garden of Eden existed. The Earth was created in six days. The Earth is 5,700-10,000 years old. From this, I conclude that my opponent has failed to meet the burden set out. Before I go, I would like to stress to my opponent that in his last post, he should type - and only type - the agreed sentence. My opponent in "version two" of this debate failed to do this and keep to the rules. Thank you. Lastly, allow me to thank my opponent, leandro. sanchez, for this entertaining and interesting debate. I would also like to thank the audience and the voter for their time and the voters (again! ) for voting. I hope to see another debate soon! Kind regards,J