I will not contradict myself!

It seems my opponent is saving up all of the last round to continue to press just two contradictions, possibly just the one on spelling and grammar, so I should use this round well to give my final defense from them, for he is right that just one contradiction is needed for me to lose the debate. Spelling and Grammar: Since my opponent plans to put the most emphasis on my comments about the importance of spelling and grammar as a contradiction I feel a need to point out that nowhere did I say that I do not care. My statement was that "It's hard to" remember to care. For all the info that statement gives about myself you could conclude that maybe I do remember to care in spite of the difficulty or how 'hard' it is for me. Let us also reexamine the first half of the statement as well. "I think I would do well to consider it more important...". Though I do speak of the cold logistics of how spelling and grammar affect a debate, I open up talking about it with the admission 'I think I would do well to...' indicating that I feel that I do not yet do this, I do not care enough. If I did in fact state here that I consider it important right now I could not say 'I would do well to consider it more.....' for if I need to 'more' than what I do consider about spelling and grammars importance, then the level of importance I place on it at the time of the statement is in some way 'low' or I could not think I need to 'more'. The term 'more' opens up how any one should sensibly read my statement about the importance of spelling and grammar as well. Without the 'more' one could read it as though I view things as either 'unimportant' or 'important' as my opponents arguments indicate that he does. But as to whether I myself have made a contradiction this debate it does not matter if Con views things as either important or not, but if I indicate that I view it that way to, and by using the term 'more' I indicate that I do not but view 'important' as something in degree's. To me, things have 'level's' of importance, it they do not then I could not say 'more'. So there is not contradiction, my statement merely indicates a level of importance placed on spelling and grammar that mentally accepts the positive effects good spelling and grammar have on a debate, but not so high a level that I lose sleep or stress out over my mistakes. For it does fall in level of 'importance' secondary to that which has primary importance to me; the content. Math: I don't know what math classes they give at your high school, but the answer to what the value of Pi, 3.14 would be good enough at mine, rounding off decimal values to a value thats close enough is something we were taught to do. also take not that I did not ever state 'equal'; like when questioned about the golden ratio I use the term 'approximately' for that's another math term they teach us to refer to the things that are not 100% accurate answers. In the question concerning the answer to the square root of 69 I openly label it an irrational number and simply give the decimal number out to as far as an online calculator would unsure of yet what answer you where looking for yet, but when talking about math usually its expected that you change what your given on the question sheet in some way even if it cannot be simplified. I thank my opponent for this fun debate, hope the readers will find that I have not contradicted myself. I am sorry for any spelling errors, I was in a rush round 4 in particular and I think it shows in the spelling and grammar has the most mistakes that round.