The republican house has not voted in favor of more than 2 bills that are benifiical to the USA

1)Interest rates on government debt are negative. Meaning government essentially gains money from borrowing (once adjusted for inflation/other factors) Meaning reducing the deficit now only decreases GDP and employment. The budget control act in 2012 will result in hundreds of thousands of jobs being lost. That is not a good thing. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com... 2)A) So you even admit that the cut cap and balance would result in more unemployment. C) Yep those countries as you say are limited in their spending resulting in them being in a crisis with massive unemployment and a poor economic outlook. Italy has a primary surplus, Spain has debt below 65% and a deficit below 7%. The reason these countries are in a crises is because they're spending is restricted. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.henderson.com... The cut cap and balance act does the same thing for America, meaning it will increase unemployment and cause future crisis's. D) Yep and the sources show that the cut cap and balance act will result in massive cuts to SS and Medicare and all government services. Meaning it could cause an end to health care for seniors and end to retirement for seniors and end to roads, and end to food safety, and end to clean air and water etc. -People like you have been saying high deficits would lead to panic and high interest rates for 3 years; yet the opposite has happened. People have been saying the same thing about Japan for 20 years yet it hasn't happened yet. How long do you have to be wrong before you finally realize you are wrong? -So according to you we should lower our debt because we might have to lower it in the future. We are currently in an economic downturn meaning you are saying we shouldn't respond to this downturn because we might have to respond to one in the future. -Japan has had high debt for 20 years yet what you say will happen has yet to happen; so I repeat how long do you have to be wrong for you to realize you are wrong? Hint: 20 years is a long time. e) Yep and all 3 of your sources were empty of actually data and analysis. You're 3 sources are trumped by mine because mine actually does an analysis. F) No it's based on economic research and statistical analysis of the effects of cut cap and balance. 3)A) The executive order was done because republicans went crazy about abortions and refused to realized that there was already a law outlawing government financed abortions. The Hyde amendment is already on the books same with a similar version in the health reform act. Currently no federal money goers to abortions meaning a bill passed to prevent federal money going to abortions doesn't change a thing. B) Also no bad effects occur even fi federal money went to abortions. 4)K so you admit you were wrong on this bill. 5)"Combating Autism Reauthorization Act of 2011" - Act to continue funding research for a cure to Autism." Notice how right in your explanation it says to continue funding research. This means this bill only maintains the status quo therefor it does not count. 6) Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act This bill only maintains current funding for certain programs meaning it is again only maintaining the status quo therefore it does not count. http://www.opencongress.org... 7) "Surface and Air Transportation Programs Extension Act of 2011" - extend the funding of transportation systems in the US Again this bill only keeps current funding for the future, meaning it maintains the status quo and therefore does not count. 8)This bill makes it legal for certain child's products to have lead in it (note I got this from the source you linked). Explain how poisoning kids is a good thing please. 9)This is the same bill in number 7; meaning you double posted it. So far my opponent has yet to provide 1 bill that the GOP house has passed that was a good for the country, he needs to provide 3 in order to win the debate.