God exist, Bible is right

3) Adam was not created in any version of the bible! Formed is always used! Why? Check the Hebrew: Strongs # 3335= Squeezed into, the Potter. Notice another witness God claiming to have formed Himself. " Isa 43:10 Ye are my witnesses saith the LORD and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed neither shall there be after meRE: Well as for Adam was not created in non of the versions, that would mean, that KJV, NKJV, NLT versions of the bible are wrong. Lets take a look at the word Formed. This is were my opponent will show a contradiction, in his text. Also in his next reply to this. Formed: he shape and structure of an object. b. The body or outward appearance of a person or an animal considered separately from the face or head; figure.That is the definition of Formed, now since formed does not mean create, and adam was not created, but formed, then my opponent has failed to show us any proof of existance, you cannot exist then exist at the same time. As for my opponent proving of a god through this non created, but formed argument is invalid, which I would be nice enough to disregard his first assumption, from the record book. If I was my opponent, I would not bring that back into play, you will contradict yourself. My opponent then speaks of Genealogies of a formed man, not created man of Adam and Cain. Well last time I checked on this debate, the title stated if god exist, and the bible is wrong. My opponent is for that God exist, and the bible is right, in all genology provides no evidence of a god. My opponent fails to realise that all names have a meaning to them. It can take any MAN TO CREATE A MEANING OF A NAME. Now if my opponent has any sucess to prove there is a God, he going to have to stay away from genology, my opponent is trying to prove of a god through human names, just because there mention in a book, there are many people name Adam today, or seth, but why were they not mention in the bible. Only one man was mention, not the hundreds of men was mention. As for 7. you still shown no evidence, and there is no DNA proof that, your accusation is true, like I said: Just because a book tells you, that does not show no proof. Then my opponent shows verses, when he stated from the beginning that Adam was not created in no versions of the bible, making the bible false, when NKJ, KJ, spoke that create was involved. As for any of his verses, they are invalid. He has shown to us in the beginning that the bibles are false, When the bible does speak of create, not form. My opponent has made his arguments with no true thought of the outcome, speaks of a book, plagarized, with no source. Also has shown no truth, just a hear say. I shall now present some arguments.My opponent believes that this god created all, that evolution is wrong: (a very good mini topic):A) Evolution means: The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the... The gradual development of something, esp. from a simple to a more complex form. B) Evolution is taking place as we speak, giving more explicid proof of evolution. Example: Baby in a mother womb, now before my opponent says, god creates the babies, let me remind you of the reproduction system, man and woman creation. Now a baby in a mother womb evolves, creating evolution: the gradual development of something. My opponent of course will say, no its wrong, when it actual proof. Now my opponent will start bring up verses from the this book, must I remind him and the voters, that this is a book. Let me say, with out proof, and actual DNA, also something speaking in ones ears to write, all his arguments coming from the bible will be false. In my next round, I will show proof, actual proof the bible is not right, when such proof is given, then God would prove to be non existance, and created by MAN. I as my opponent to very clearly be adviced to what he writes, or evidence he will show. I will let him know now, anything you write from any bible will be avoided, as we are not looking for hear say but evidence, proof. If my opponent speaks from the bible, I will then in my next round show flaws, and contradictions of the bible. Why you ask? with only hear say, and words in a book, a book that has flaws, and contradictions. We are looking for my opponent to show us BoP. Not words in a book, for there are many books in this world today as we speak. Stories, but of course, you wouldn't believe them but a book as well written by man, only stating that a being spoke, with no actual proof that a being did speak. Also remember during them times as these were created, order back then was limited, havac, chaios was badly, so why not a group of people get to gether write stories, and create a god, to put fear in the people around them, explaining what happens if you disobey, explaining that if you do not listen, this being will get you, strike you down. Society had to have some kind of order. Now as time went on, people started to realize, opening there minds, now the concept of this so called god does not apply, as a nation now, we have evolved our minds, as science grew, as technology grew, we open our minds, not keeping a closed mind. Once time passed, and we hit today, we always question, how such a pure being, a lovable being if you search you will find, the being that cures all, how come children that have no understanding such as first borns, have cancer, were was this being to cure the non knowing. If he truly has the power, and is lovable, there is not a being, and we realized that. Now you all speak of this being knowing all, when something knows all, such thing knows future, past, present. If something existed before, all was created, knowing all, he created evil. But now my opponent will give the argument of free will, or men created evil, or the devil. which is all invalid still. For if this being is true, he knew of free will, he knew of men, he knew of the devil before all was created. KEEP IN MIND, you all SPEAK that this so called BEING CREATED ALL. there is no exeptions, or any way to get out of that statement. CREATED ALL. Now lets get to this time. IF this being did exist, he had all this power, almighty, who loves, and cares, who is pure, HE KNOWS ALL, why would he then let the children at Sandy Elementry School get killed, if he knew all, then he knew of it before it happen, if he all powerful, and cares, and loves then he would of stopped it before it happen. Now my opponent will then say Do not Blame this God. Why not, you all make this so call god loving, and caring, and knowing of all before and after, all powerful, these kids were young, but yet he did not save them, from this guy. Well then that shows that this so called God, doesn't exist. When this thing could of done anything, ANYTHING to prevent it. I would love to see what my opponent argument on that is, and what excuse he would speak of. Could his excuse be free will, But like i stated this so call being knew all before it was.