An Ideal Leader

Some clarification before arguments are made:- I don't like referring to the leader as a "dictator" because I feel as though it implies some sort of government. I'm merely focusing on the decision to follow majority rules strictly.- We are not choosing a specific dictator, or any qualities of a dictator. We can argue which qualities can be made, but at the end of the day, I'm just interested in deciding whether or not a leader should follow the italicized statement I posted in round one.My Stance (More clarification to hopefully show what I'm arguing for): I stand wholeheartedly behind the idea that a leader should do what the people he leads wishes. It seems counter-intuitive for a leader to walk the opposite direction as those he follows. This is an extreme, and I wish this would never occur, but as an example of how a leader should perform, lets suppose his group of 2500 people wish to allow murder. Lets also suppose the leader strongly disagrees with this notion. I do think he should try to convince his people to see his opinion and ensure murder is not allowed; however, if the time comes to make the decision, and more than, let's say, 1500 people agree to legalize murder, it should be his duty to enact the law. I know this is extreme and I hope under no circumstances would happen; however, if you get a group of people with over 60 percent wanting to allow murder, than it is their right.Arguments:1. There is actually this really interesting phenomena in statistics which I'll try to explain as best I can. The more people you survey on a situation, the closer to the true answer you will get. The easiest way to show this is with the old guessing how many jelly beans are in a jar game. Lets say you ask 2 people how many jelly beans they think are in the jar. If both of them guess too high or too low, then the mean of their guessing will not be close to the actual number. But lets say you asked 50 people, and averaged their guesses. Because the high guesses would cancel out the low guesses, this will give an average remarkably close to the real number of jelly beans in the jar. Not only that, but the distribution of guesses will be approximately normal. This means over 60 percent of people will all be reasonably close to the correct number of jelly beans in the jar. (http://onlinestatbook.com... if you don't know much about statistics, you can mess around with this applet for a couple minutes to get what I'm saying) This being said, with a large group of people (10-5000 I believe is what I said), the chances are the majority is going to get the correct option anyway. Not every time, I know, but statistically, it is very likely a group of people will have the majority wanting to do what is "correct".2.I firmly believe in the statement that all people are equal. Not in the same ways but equal just the same. When you add all the proficiencies and deficiencies, both mental and physical, everyone has the same value. From there its just simple math, 1500 > 1000.3.Let's pretend the group of people is one person for a second. This one person is made up all the 2000+ that are in the original group. This one person is taking a test an has narrowed down the choices to either "A" or "C". Let's also presume 1750 people in the large person think the answer is "A", and the other 750 think the answer is "C". If you were taking this test, and you were 75% sure the answer was "A", I trust you would bubble in "A" on your answer sheet. The leader is essentially this large person's brain. It takes all the information it receives and makes the final decision. Why would the brain ever choose to go with the answer it was less sure of?I would again like to say this is my first debate, so if I have done anything about this incorrectly, please let me know.