Hell is not a Bible teaching

First of all, your argument that the definition means eternal punishment in a fire is not the lake of fire is a mute point, and very petty, nevertheless, allow me to prove to you that hell is not misinterpreted, and is very much so a lake of fire where all those who do not know Christ will go.Argument #1: "The lake of fire is mentioned in the bible, and there for it IS biblical, very much so"The word hell is translated from several different words. The Hebrew word is Sheol which means "pit"Numbers 16:33 "So they and all that belonged to them went down alive into Sheol, and the earth closed over them, and they perished from the midst of the assembly."Greek: gehenna (from the Hebrew Valley of Hinnom)Translated “hell” meaning place of everlasting torment Matthew 10:28 And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell. Read more: http://www.whatchristianswanttoknow.com...Revelation 19:20, "And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were castalive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone."These scriptures above as well as their grammatical origins prove your statement is false, and if you need more information, follow the link I posted which was one of my sources, besides the bible of course.Argument #2: The core of the Earth is HellScientists in Siberia drilled into the core of the Earth, and it they recorded the cries from the lake of fire below the Earth known as the core.Amos 9:2 proves it is possible to dig into hell, and this was very possibly a prophecy for this event:it reads: "“Though they dig into hell, thence shall mine hand take them; though they climb up to heaven, whence I bring them down.” If you look at the second sentence of the verse and remember the tower of Babel, then you know it is not symbollically suggest they climb up to heaven but it is speaking in literal terms. Therefore, if the second part of the verse was not symbolism rather a literal statement, then one has to suggest that the first part of the verse talking about digging into hell is literal as well. I will provide a summary of the article but I suggest my opponent as well as the voters to copy and paste the below URL and read the entire article before placing your votes, or your opposing argument. A Scientists and crew dug to the core, getting closer then anyone had before. The DR. in charge of the drilling came back with a sound clip off the crying souls his team and he had heard, and his telling of the event is bone chilling. The sound clip was investigated by the top scientists in signapore said their results were inconclusive. Of coures, they say the Doctor and his team could have falsified the findings using fake voices, but if you read the article you will be able to discern the truth for yourself.https://hellandheaventestimonies.wordpress.com...Even if you don't buy the story of the doctor and his team hearing the souls of hell on their mission to the core, this point is real more substantial then anything as far as the point goes. The argument was the hell is not biblical. The first argument I posed in this post was a direct response that disproved his point. EVEN IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN THE BIBLE OR ITS PRINCIPLES, this is not the issue here. The issue is rather or not a lake of fire/hell is IN THE BIBLE i.e. is it biblical? the answer is yes, it is in the bible. That's just a fact. Rather you worship Jesus or Budha, you still can't deny the lake of fire's presents in the bible of Christianity.