Brad Stine as a Comedian

I'd like to point out how Pro has Conceded my Arguments that Brad Stine is all I said He was, and Attempts to create a straw man argument by laying out what a Good Comedian is, and How am Being selective. I don't have to abide by it, But because there are rounds left, I will for the sake of Argument. I will compare our Pal Brad Stine to the Contemporary greats of Comedy.(Through Pro's methods of Rating Comedians) Types of Comedy Louis C.K.-Observational, Political, and personal Humour from experiences. Dave Chappelle-Political, Cultural, ethnic, and observational comedy from personal experience. George Carlin-Political and Religious satire from personal experience and observation. Russell Peters-Ethnic and cultural humour from personal experience and family. Brad Stine-Political, religious, and observational Humour. Presentation Louis C.K.-Moderate Paced Speech, Mild vocal Tone, Volume level elevates and changes at times. George Carlin-Fast Paced Speech, Higher Vocal Tone, Volume level elevates and changes at times Dave Chappelle-Slower paced speech, Mellow vocal Tone, Volume level usually more quiet and relaxed. Russell Peters-Moderate paced speech, Mild vocal tone, Volume level can elevate and changes at times. Brad Stine- Moderate to Fast Paced Speech, Mild, scruffy Tone, Volume level Erratic, Yells Frequently to emphasize. Flow Louis C.K.- Smooth, and easy to Follow George Carlin, Fast, but easy to follow Dave Chappelle, Slow, and easy to follow Russell Peters, Moderate, and easy to follow Brad Stine, Erratic, and Sometimes unintelligible(not easy to follow). This link(1). Nuff Said. Speech Basically what I've said for each one above. Pro wanted me to explain this however. Rhythm Pro, That makes no sense, this isn't music. Rhythm literally means "Strong, repeated, Pattern of Movement or Sound"(2) "My opponent quotes from Stine's routines out of context without regard to these important elements." That's awfully bold for you to say, Having stated your self you have never listened to Brad Stine in the first round. Having owned his DVD, "Wussification", I think I have a little more say In my opinion. Having listened and went to performances of Louis C.K. and Russell Peters, I can compare. Brad Stine is not a Good comedian. "Being funny is the only thing that matters, and my opponent verifies as much near the end of his round: "Being a Good Comedian implies one is Actually funny."" That's Correct, I do believe he's not funny. Instead of asking to prove why he's not, participate in this debate and show me why he Is. "Neither does my opponent address my argument which is that Comedian's goodness are measured by their success. If a comedian is good, then the comedian will have enough of an audience to sustain his career. Stine has that. An audience means that people think Stine is funny, which means Stine is funny. If Stine is funny, then he's a good comedian. Therefore Stine is a good comedian." If success is any indication of actual Talent, Why don't we look at various individuals in our Times. Donald Trump Dan Bilzerian Jacqueline Mars People who inherited Millions, if not Billions from Family. There fairly Rich and Successful, I suppose There amazing in their respective fields? No. Pro makes a Blanket statement and attempts to generalize that Success=Talent. I does not. "If a comedian is good, then the comedian will have enough of an audience to sustain his career. Stine has that." ......Really? Basic psychology and behavioural test here, listen Carefully. Lets Say there are 100 typical adolescent Males, ranging in the age if 12-16. Let's assume many are immature and still growing up. If I told Penis and Sex Jokes, and 100% laughed, that would be a large percentage of the audience, therefore meaning I'm funny Because All laughed. Why is that statement incorrect, Pro? You tell me. FINAL STATEMENTS CONTENTION 1. Appeal A person is inclined to enjoy or approve something if they Think like it, share views, or act the same, am I wrong, Pro? Brad Stine is Conservative, and Christian, I would assume that his style of "Comedy" Attracts that audience, is that wrong to assume? CONTENTION.2 Comparison to other Comedians I compared, and Revealed the discrepancies. Brad Stine has different Styles, modes, and Types of "Comedy" he utilizes in performance. These are the things that set him apart, and make him bad. FINAL STATEMENTS I've Continually provided overwhelming support and evidence for my Claim, which is Brad Stine is all I labelled him. Pro attempts to create a Straw man Argument by stating he's a "Good Comedian", but that's not what the debate was about, it was about what I labelled him as. Even then I've proved that Brad Stine is an awful Comedian. Thanks to Pro, and try to Know a subject Thoroughly before Throwing Personal Attacks and Defending something with little prior experience. I think there's a word for that, But I'm tired of telling you The Sky is Blue. (1)() (2)(https://www.google.ca...)