problem with the cosmological argument

The universe began to exist at some point:"1) Science:According to modern science the universe is somewhere between 12 & 15 Billion years old."i assumed here you said that the universe began to exit between 12 & 15 billion years old while i didn't disagree with the age of the universe i disagree with the statement that it didn't exist before that time the universe did exist just in different form (hot,dense state)because the big bang theory said the universe began to expand not to exist from a hot and dense state .example: if the age of a person is 19 years old that doesn't mean he didn't exist before that time because he did exist as a baby in his mother womb"2) Philosophy:While infinity is used in mathematics all the time, it has it's limits (pardon the pun), when it comes to certain things like time. The most famous infinity paradox is known as Hilbert's hotel. http://en.wikipedia.org......'s_paradox_of_the_Grand_HotelIf the universe is infinitely old, there are the same number of "days" as there are "years" in the existence of the universe."here i wasn't straw maning the problems you pointed out about a infinite existence say that ((anything)) that doesn't have a beginning is illogical to exist so if the universe doesn't have a beginning then the universe is illogical to exist then it must have a beginning and not only the universe requires a beginning in our understanding of reality but everything requires a beginning and anything without a beginning would lead to infinity paradox"there may be other other explanation that also by definition is outside of space time and have no beginning"Like what?nothing is by definition is outside of space time and have no beginning so instead of saying god created the universe i can say the universe came from nothing.and (af ab sgsg gfgh) that's something by definition outside of space time and have no beginning and its not a god "There are only two kinds of things that are both timeless and immaterial: minds and abstract objects (like the number 2). Since abstract numbers cannot stand in causal relations to the universe, by process of elimination, we can rightly conclude that the first cause is a mind. Moreover, the first cause is a free agent. An impersonal mechanically operating cause is not a possibility since such a cause cannot exist without its effect. If such a machine contains within it the sufficient condition for a temporal effect then it must also have temporal effects built into it as well, which defeats the aforementioned timelessness."IF YOU MEAN BY MIND (consciousness) THEN IT CANT BE BOTH TIMELESS AND IMMATERALbecause if there a timeless conscious mind then he is required to precise all action happening all at once because for such mind there wont be (past ,present or future) and if that being is also infinite then he is required to precise infinite action happening all at once some of those action would be contradictory.and also cant be immaterial because we know that consciousness originate from the brain and the brain is a material object so the mind cant be immaterial because it require a material object like the brain to exist.the bubble theory say that our universe exist on a bubble and that bubble is one of many bubbles (multiverse) and those bubbles can split from each other and make new bubbles and there may be a a mother bubble(universe) splitting from it other small bubbles(universes)http://www.youtube.com...