Challenging The Status Quo: A New Ideology In The Works

"In life, one needs to make enemies, one will not succeed without them." -Not that I agree or disagree with this piece of pseudo-profundity, but it entirely stands in contrast with a central pillar of your proclaimed "religion". PEACE. Requiring enemies for self - advancement isn"t exactly promoting "peace" is it? Nor is it promoting a NON-Discriminatory thesis, is it? It seems you"re utterly confused. Let me explain something to you about life, for your own benefit, you would be wise to remember it. Merely claiming to be something --- doesn"t affect the fabric of reality. As an example, you can claim to have "good English writing talent," (a poor articulation itself) but it hasn"t stopped you from having horrendous grammar, torrents of misspelling, and completely failing to pen down a coherent argument. Being something requires study, dedication, and time, the fruits of which speak for themselves. I don"t know what the manipulation of texts, or misguided interpretation of them, has to do with this discussion, because your claiming to be founder of a "religion" that is entirely absent of any text. A notion that, in itself, is worthy of mockery. Now, as we covered before, simply because you claim to be something, doesn"t make it so. You can shout out to the world, "I stand up for injustice!", but that hardly makes it so. Judging by your apparent inability to conceptualize what a religion is, I hold serious doubt over your understanding of justice. Let me be clear, I am not questioning your innate want of justice. ---- A virtue most of humanity equally desires, I am questioning your ability to discern between justice and injustice. Many unnamed horrors have been perpetrated on humanity by individuals claiming the name of "justice" --- people whom did not have the intellectual capacity to measure the ripples their actions. I am indeed saying, judging by your own words, you have a very novice understanding of the doctrine and or religious philosophy, that you claim to be "well versed in". I say this because calling MRAAJism a "religion", is like calling a piece of drywall, a house. It"s completely ridiculous. I"m not surprised that my discrimination argument wasn"t absorbed well, let me explain further. Our entire species of primate has survived because of sexual discrimination, you discriminate whom you are to have children with, right? You discriminate whom you allow to watch over your children, right? You discriminate against certain things when you eat, when you drink, when you make any choice you are discriminating. So, claiming simply to claim, that discrimination of any form, is innately wrong, is an absurdity. In closing, your second argument was an abhorrent waste. You provided no additional information into the proposed religion of MRAAJism (because there isn"t anymore, lol) You didn"t respond to, correct, or expand on any of my refutations. You still lack ANY of the components that would label this, as a "religion", because it isn"t a religion, it is a poorly conceptualized daydream, that not a soul finds meaningful, other than to yourself, personally. I"m still waiting on a single coherent explanation of MRAAJism. Hopefully in the third argument you will conjure up your expertise of which you continuously refer to, because as of yet I haven"t seen any.