Religious Beliefs Based only on the Christian Bible Must Condemn Homosexual Relationships

(KJV) Romans 1:27 (And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. ) (ASV) Romans 1:27 (and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.) (HCSB) Romans 1:27 (The males in the same way also left natural sexual intercourse [s] with females and were inflamed in their lust for one another. Males committed shameless acts with males (AT) and received in their own persons [t] the appropriate penalty for their perversion.) (NLT) Romans 1:27 (And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.) (ESV) Romans 1:27 (and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another,(AX) men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.) You can see where im going with this, if you look through any translation of the bible they all point to this meaning homosexuality, any attempt to say that it is talking about something other than that is simply avoiding the facts for your own purpose, it is obviously there to see. You say that "most" scholars do not think that the bible points towards homosexuality is a sin, I may have only posted a few translations but to post them all would take up mure than my word limit. If there are truly more that agree to this point your making i would like to see the proof of consensus made that there are (in fact) a higher percentage of translators who do in fact think this, because if there is they may want to publish there bible that does not condemn homosexuality very soon because i only have a few that i find do so. Also if you have a problem with the versus of Galations I would suggest you look to yourself instead of me, it is not my logic I have spoken to you, those were the direct versus of the bible, so your problem is not with me, it is with the bible itself. If you disagree with the bible as such you have seem to proven, I would say that this debate is for the most part useless. Also you say i would not be loving my neighbor, but using your logic I could simply look back at the translation and deviate it according to my own purposes, for it simply sais to love my neighbor and nothing more, many horrid things can be done in the name of love, but i must use my bible (although it does not always specifically guide me) the stories, riddles, and original order of Gods creation guide me to understand a moral law in which is not directly stated, to read the bible and think that it is always completely straight forward and only look skin deep into its real meaning, is to assume the morals of a computer. When you read your bible you do not change the meaning based on what you want it to mean, you change yourself according to what the bible sais. (I hope you have gotten as much from my opinion as I have from yours, you have certainly made some interesting points and i have learned alot from what you have suggested. Please note that this was all in good spirit, and i have no hatred for you or what you believe, I do believe homosexuality is a sin and will be punished, but no more than the sins of fornication, disobedience, or all others mentioned in Romans, some sins of which i must call my own. I hope you keep studying further in your bible on the subject, I wish you well in your searching for truth, if you have found how i think to be remotely interesting feel free to discuss with me anything else you find neccessary in the future)