Adolf Hitler, as evil than you think he was, does not deserve all of the hate he had received.

Before I advance on points, I would like to set a baseline, starting with the issues of right and wrong. There are two types of morality, subjective and objective. You stated that Hitler knew what he was doing was wrong, which I understand, but let us break it down. Subjective morality is the idea that morality is based around a person's own opinions. Objective morality is the idea that morality is not based around a person's own opinions, ideas and experiences, but factually true. There is a factual set of right and wrong. This can only lie in two places, religion or law. Law in it self was created and shaped by man and shaped through subjective beliefs about right and wrong throughout history, except in the cases of theocracies such as Iran. So we can rule out law and that leaves religion. So the question is, did Hitler adhere to a religious morality? Well, most likely not. Hitler was an avid believer of Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism - "Theory that persons, groups, and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin had proposed for plants and animals in nature." -Merriam Webster. Hitler's belief lied in the belief that the survival of the fittest aspect in plant life adheres as well to life in a social term. Hitler thought that groups and races were subject to survival of the fittest. He believed this, the key is believed. Social Darwinism, does go against various Christian beliefs, as it requires a belief in evolution in the first place. If we know he believed in Social Darwinism, we can deduce that Hitler adheres to a subjective morality as it isn't a religious one. Unless you disagree, from this point on it is wrong to say "Hitler was evil", "Hitler knew what he was doing was wrong", if he adheres to a subjective morality, then this cannot be argued, as it his belief. The only thing to counter a social morality is what I refer to as a "mob mentality morality". Morality formed from the general subjective view of right and wrong, but this varies from culture to culture, and experience to experience. By this stage, Hitler had seen Germany fail miserably after World War One, seen the Great Depression hit Germany very hard and his "mob mentality" would have been one formed of the struggles during the Great Depression, and the seeming stability of Jews. Hitler couldn't have gained the mob mentality that you know, because they were muffled by the Great Depression and events going on around him, including the stability of Jews. So now I think we have established that Hitler's views were subjective. "I will debate you on this. Personally i see nothing right in any action that Hitler did at all. First of killing over 6 million Jews is just one of the thing that he deserved to be hated for. He knew what he was doing, and he knew it was wrong. I might have taken a different standpoint if Adolf Hitler was oblivious to the things he was doing. It was totally irrational. He was a mass murderer. Second of all!, After legally gaining power in Germany, Hitler quickly began solidifying his position by putting those that disagreed with him into concentration camps. He created massive amounts of propaganda that strengthened German pride by blaming all their problems on Communists and Jews. The concept of pan-Germanism inspired Hitler to combine German peoples in various countries in Europe as well as look east for lebensraum. Nobody needs to be the scape goat. the Nazis created an elaborate and intensive system to work Jews as slaves and kill them. Hitler is considered one of the most evil people in history because of the Holocaust. Any thing that he could ave done that would have even seemed "GOOD" had evil intentions behind." If Hitler's views were subjective, then he couldn't have possibly known what he was doing was wrong. Especially with the support he had. When you have support, when your mentality spreads at that point for you it becomes fact, which is what happens in everyday life. He wouldn't have had a way of thinking what he was doing was wrong, as there wasn't enough of an uproar against him for the scale of what he was doing to manifest in him. The way a general view, the mob mentality of right and wrong works is that a majority of people believe in a subjective view, it becomes right, but it is still subjective. He wasn't oblivious, he thought what he was doing was in favour of his beliefs, and in the favour of Germany, as he thought he was right. He had followers to also help secure his beliefs. This is purely subjective, so you writing that Hitler was evil and anything good had evil intentions behind isn't valid. Most of what you wrote isn't valid, because simply he thought what he was doing was right, and it may not have fitted with the mob mentality of the world today, but his failing society was one of the reasons he had those subjective thoughts. Mentality is based on experiences, and to generalize things largely, the citizens of the western world have similar experiences so a similar mentality, but Hitler during times of huge trouble didn't have average experiences. He thought what he was doing was right, and as it was subjective, you opposing it is trying to enforce your subjective views, based by the mob mentality of what is viewed as evil today, or by an objective morality. Any of these cases, both you and Hitler are human, you don't have any more rights to an opinion than he did, thus by giving him lots of hate because you think his beliefs were evil, you are imposing your self and opinions over his. So the reason he doesn't deserve all of the hate is because most of it is just a disagreement in opinions, which isn't fair, he is entitled to them. http://www.merriam-webster.com... http://www.nobeliefs.com... http://www.answersingenesis.org... My Own Knowledge