BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
how i got cure from hiv/herpes

This is real take it serious, Who will believe that herbs can cure seven years HIV in my body, I never believe that this will work i have spend a lot when getting drugs from the hospital to keep me healthy, What i was waiting for is death because i was broke, One day i heard about this great man who is well know of HIV and cancer cure, I decided to email him, Unknowingly to me that this will be the end of the HIV disease in my body, He prepare the herbal medicine for me, And give me instruction on how to take it, At the end of the two week, He told me to go to the hospital for a check up, And i went, Surprisingly after the test the doctor confirm me negative, I thought it was a joke, I went to another hospital was also negative, Then i took my friend who was also HIV positive to the Dr Duck, After the treatment she was also confirm negative. He also have the herb to cure Cancer and Herpes virus please i want every one with this virus to be free, That is why am dropping his email address, Do contact him he is a great man. The government is also interested in this Dr Duck, Thank you for saving my life, And I promise I will always testify for your good work. Contact him: greatoracletemplesolution @live. Com
Foreign Aid

(Of course aid worked very well in some countries, especially in Asian countries. In Africa foreign aid doesn’t show any significant results.)-So you are well aware that foreign aid works effectively in some countries, and if that’s the case, it is really necessary. In some countries, however, foreign aid does not work as you said. Well, the solution is not to diminish foreign aid as it would affect other countries, but only to improve transparency of foreign aid spending in African countries.(Aids will be effective only if good government intervention occurs. That is why the US should find an alternative option to help African states.)-If it can be made effective by government intervention, then there is no need to abolish foreign aid or find alternative in helping other countries. No need to go extreme, but only to improve current conditions by making reforms. Clearly, if something can be done without affecting other countries who benefit from foreign aid, then it should be done.Arguments for Foreign Aid:1. To augment economic development of the recipient country.2. To establish better ties with other countries.3. To give aid for humanitarian grounds
Foreign Aid

Of course aid worked very well in some countries, esspically in Aisian countries ( Asian tigers). However, the word foreign aid is mostly associated with Africa. In africa foreing doesnt show any significant results. I believe that the US shoud better anaylize their aid policy. The reason why it worked in Asian countries is that Asian government provided good enicironment for developement. They supported exports by helding contests among firms, they invested in human capital. But African states' governments are curropted, therefore governments do not intervene enough and interested more in filling their own pockets. Institutions which are responsible for giving foreign aid are not interested in effectivness of those aids. It is more important to them just to work accroding to the plan set by the US governemnt and send spicific amount of foreing aid during spicific time period. Aids will be effective only if good government intervent ion occur. That is why the US should find an alternative option to help African states.
Foreign Aid

President Ronald Reagan said about U.S. international engagement, “We cannot play innocents abroad in a world that is not innocent.” Foreign Aid is importantReasons:1. To augment economic development of the recipient country.Bangladesh and India where foreign aid appears to have played an important role in the development process. For instance, 100 percent of Bangladesh’s development budget depends on aid which has made a significant contribution to the reconstruction of its economy. In India, foreign aid has financed over 8 percent of the domestic investments and about 15 percent of imports. 2. To establish better ties with other countries.A country like United States will develop strong relationship with other countries because of foreign aid. This would widen the strategic advantage of the US as so far as other countries are concerned. Similarly, as relationship improves, the US may demand that the recipient countries will make purchases only in US, which subsequently would benefit our economy.3. To give aid for humanitarian groundsIt is everyone’s nature, whether a country or a person, to help people affected by natural calamities. As economically advantaged country, US should support the people of other countries when they are hit by natural disaster because their own government alone cannot do it. In fact, It might come as a surprise to learn that less than one percent of the U.S. budget is spent on foreign assistance. It might even be shocking to discover that, despite this relatively small amount, these funds are literally saving millions of lives and improving the lives of many more millions of people. We need to save humanity! We need to help them!
Foreign Aid

From my perspective the United States of America and European Union should stop giving foreing aid to the developing states, because negative consequences of such help outwieght positive ones. Most of the foreing aid given by Developed States are missused by the government of develeping states. Over 1 trillion dollars has been given to Africa over the last 60 years, however there are no real results to show improvement. Presidents, Dictators use those money in their own interests. One of the best examples of this is Mobutu, who is famous for leasing Concorde to fly his daughter to her wedding in the Ivory Coast shortly after negotiating a lucrative aid deal with Ronald Regan in the 1980s. Furthermore, foreign aid causes conflicts such us civil war to get access to unlimited aid. Moreover, limitations created by foreign aid harm states. For instance: aid reduces savings and investments or aid can be inflationary. Finally, foreign aid leads to aid dependency which of course negatively affects Africa. Aid dependency makes African people lazy; it leads to lower tax revenues because revenue is already coming from foreign donors. It also makes Africa dependent on foreign donors which give them some control over Africa.
Debate.org sucks

Thanks for the quick reply. I hope to debate you until the end.Rebuttals:My opponent points out about the problem with the bug that's pestering the site. But this is not a massive problem. If you want to avoid getting hung up, and you are certainly saying it's not your fault, you should be more specific with your criteria for a challenger. Or you can chat a member of the site and deliberate a match-up. This problem does not absolutely justify the notion that the site sucks. On balance, the good of DDO far outweigh the harm. I will proceed to the reiteration of my original arguments. I would not call this reconstruction since nothing was attacked. Arguments:I. It teaches discipline and time managementMy opponent merely mentions this argument and did nothing to criticize it sufficiently. The point stands. II. ‎It refines argumentation skillsPoint stands. III. ‎It allows cyber socializationStands. Conclusion:I have effectively proposed a solution for his problem and showed how this bug is barely scratching the DDO gates. Three of my point stands unscathed. I maintain that, on balance, the site's good outweigh the harms. Therefore, DDO does not suck.
Debate.org sucks

I only start debates with topics that I know really well. During the course of this debate, I will give several examples of topics that I have debated in the past. You talked about time management, so lets talk about time management. When I debate on a topic that I know really well, I go all out. In the past, I have spent 3-5 hours on each debate that I have started. If the person debating me doesn't respond in time, then that round should be forfeited, which means they would be at a disadvantage. If my debates keep getting hung up, why should I bother to put any effort into my debates?
Debate.org sucks

I hope you don't forfeit. Good luck! I am for the notion that, on balance, debate.org does not suck. I have three reasons. I. It teaches discipline II. R06;It refines argumentation skills III. R06;It allows cyber socialization Arguments: I. It teaches discipline and time management Time is of the essence. As debaters who challenge other opponents under a certain timeframe, good management of time is needed. This challenge only poses as a lesson to us that if we cannot submit in time, we cannot win. This is where discipline comes in. If we allow ourselves to procrastinate, knowing that time is running, we can never have a fruitful debate. This moves debaters to sit in a chair and write and argue. In the end, we discipline ourselves to work and manage our time so that we have the chance to debate. II. It refines argumentation skills. As we learn to maneuver our way in this website, we encounter concepts that are new or against us. And so, argumentation spawned from this cause. We challenge ourselves and challenge others on whose argument can compel the most or deliver the biggest impact. Even without engaging in debates for a while, reading discussions in this site shows us how great debaters attack the opponent's defense and defend from their offense. III. It allows cyber socialization. A great way to spend some of your time is chatting with friends and exchanging ideas with co-debaters may it be in the forum or comments section. It may not be the best place to socialize, but it allows you to build a cyber network with people who are on the same site as you. For these reasons, I negate.
God is real. (Christian-Father-Of-Jesus-God)

If evolution is true, then organisms would slowly adapt. They wouldn't just suddenly grow legs. There would be a long period where the fish had nubs where the legs would eventually be, and they would be slowed drastically in the water. That means that predators could eat them easily. This would lead to natural selection breeding out the leg nubs before the fish even made it to land. Also, if God is not real, how do you explain the B.C. years? And the Bible? Why would Jesus let himself be crucified if God didn't exist? If not Heaven or Hell, where do we go when we die?
God is real. (Christian-Father-Of-Jesus-God)

We did evolve from fish, because a changing environment caused the fish to adapt to their therefore causing evolution to take place. The lowest member of the food chain (a type of fish) was forced to move onto land & escape it's enemies in the sea. Therefore adapting to their environment through evolution & as time went on each species that moved onto land's offspring changed & adapted to better fit their environment. We have fossils & genetic evidence to prove that this happen.
God is real. (Christian-Father-Of-Jesus-God)

The first point I'd like to make is that we are here. This alone is sufficient proof that God exists. Am I supposed to believe that some atoms just 'got together' and decided to become a fish? Then the fish just decided to go up on land? We could not have evolved from fish, because we are nothing like them. It's just the process of elimination, if evolution isn't true, then God must be real.
Fashion is ruining the culture and society

I'm new to this so I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly. I do not think fashion has nothing to do with culture. Culture is being done within the family and fashion is a society preference. My family culture is something done without choice. Fashion is a choice. Nudity is a form of art. Anyone can choose to watch or look at nudity. These days you can also use settings to set the ratings. If culture is being ruined in your family's home, there is a deeper issue then fashion. If fashion is the issue, try to open your eyes to another definition of beauty.
The EU Banning Memes

First off this debate would be wrong. Eu did not ban memes. They just filtered out some unintended and very controversial memes. The thing is called article 13, Whereas copyright can be used against memes. I'm not saying that memes are bad. I'm just pro-article 13. It gives some benefits for the meme community. Reason #1: Clean community As i stated, Article 13 gives copyright to the meme community. For example when you make a thanos meme the marvel/thanos company can sue the user. This is because when the copyrights are not distributed, People will abuse the power. For example, The farmers rise up because, Welp, They are legal to do so. They are sort of abusing their rights, Which is bad. Memes should also gain copyrights if they are truly original. This is also in the article 13. Suppose you are the creator of the meme "21", Yet you don't want anybody use it, Yet they also abuse it to make fluids of memes, How do you feel? I know what do you think. What if they accept it? Well if they accept it then it is the right of the copyright distributed. Copyright could be distributed since you have the right to use it. it appears that memes are just funny blogs. Blogs are just informal publishments, Publishments are just what is allowed for the internet & others. Those things may be suspended, Thus some memes are suspended. I am not saying ALL. I am saying SOME. These will simply get removed by the European society. Publishing memes to be abused is like giving the power to the people where you don't know what they would actually do. This is dangerous. You don't know that is on the internet anymore because it is so damn filthy. It is like removing the federal government. There are already a meme god called felix kjellberg. He make memes. Everything he makes was enough. I know these memes are from the publics and he just inspect them. This is just an exaggeration. People are allowed to diss America, But it is illegal to rob a house. And also it is not you cannot do. It is just it is illegal. see you at round 2.
RESOLVED: Wrestling (High School), as a sport, best prepares one for spontaneous combat

Firstly I would like to clarify some things. Spontaneous combat WILL devolve into a ground fight. Of course it will start in a standing position, but eventually someone will grab his opponent, and from there any skill in punching is clearly useless. 1. Technique The wrestler, again, is superior to the MMA fighter in ground to ground combat. The wrestler only trains in the art of ground to ground combat, and the MMA fighter has weakened his ability to combat on the ground due to over spreading his practices. My opponent also states several times that a wrestler is not used to practices such as choking, punching, elbowing, and breaking limbs such as the arm. I would like to remind the voters that although the wrestler practices a much more safe sport, he is still capable of submissions. Although I couldn't say for sure that a wrestler could break one's arm given the chance, he could and definitely would put the MMA fighter into various positions that render him immobile, such as cradles. 2. Physical Performance The wrestler lives for wrestling. Because of this, the wrestler will ignore pain, and will work until failure, and then do 3 more repetitions. The wrestler lives to win. For him to do this, he must work-out and practice around the clock in order to stay ahead of the unknown, his competitor. He believes that whatever he does, not matter the amount or intensity, is inferior to that of his opponent, who is always working one step ahead of himself. For the wrestler to beat said opponent, he must invest just that much more time, and therefore is in much better shape than an MMA fighter. 3. Determination Again, the wrestler lives for wrestling. An MMA fighter sees the martial arts as a profession. This is very similar to the NFL, where in College football players play from their heart, but in the NFL players play from their wallet. There is an obvious lack of determination. If the only thing an MMA fighter cares for is his paycheck, what is the absolute value that drives him to victory? Clearly, the wrestler cares more about his sport than the MMA fighter cares about his respective sport, and thus it becomes obvious that the wrestler has superior determination and will to succeed. Conclusion: Because a wrestler has superior technique, performance, and determination, he would be more apt in the field of spontaneous combat (street fighting) than an MMA fighter.
RESOLVED: Wrestling (High School), as a sport, best prepares one for spontaneous combat

Thank you for accepting, I was expecting one form of martial arts but I will accept all of them as one sport. 1. Technique Wrestler's are undeniably the most well trained fighters on the ground in close quarters. Sure, a MMA fighter may be superior at first by knowing of more advanced punches and blocks and various other ranged attacks, but the fight will eventually devolve into a ground fight. This is where the wrestler would subdue the MMA fighter with much ease, as he is specially trained for these grappling situations. 2. Physical Performance By over-expanding his skill set, the MMA fighter has wasted valuable time and has become mediocre at all forms of combat. Again, the wrestler is still king on the mat, because he will win the ever eventual ground fight. This extra time, where the wrestler is not training in multiple forms of martial arts, will be spent on a combination of endurance and intensity training. This places the wrestler in prime physical condition, being much more fit than a MMA fighter. 3. Determination Well, again you have deceived me. I was attempting to keep the debate to sports that apply to high school students, because of course a person that has completed school and can devote his life to a profession is of course going to incorporate more time into his sport than a wrestler. This by no means shows any amount of determination however. The wrestler plays a game of chess with his opponent. When he is on that mat, it is a battle of endurance and wit. This demands determination, as the wrestler with the bigger heart will win. MMA only demands that one be proficient in luck. Once a fighter is in a "cheap" position, the opposing fighter has already been defeated. In wrestling, there are many counter moves, while in MMA choking and cheap shotting, among other things, are allowed. Conclusion: Again, the wrestler has better technique, performance, and determination. The MMA fighter would fear the wrestler, because he knows that within 20 seconds he will be slammed into submission.
Silly Debate: Mickey Mouse vs. Sora

King Mickeys Powers:Super strength, speed, durability, agility, time manipulation, flight/levitation, energy manipulation, electromagnetic and gravity manipulation, adept in elemental magic, teleportation, spatial manipulation, healing, forcefield, and is an expert swordsman. [1]This alone could easlily destroy Sora and Roxas combined. But we are talking about Sora only. Enough said. [1] http://vsbattles.wikia.com...
Silly Debate: Mickey Mouse vs. Sora

I am almost certain that me, my opponent, and everyone who is viewing this debate all know that Mickey Mouse, is one of the most skilled fighter ever. He is a keyblade master. His size and agility give him an advantage which he uses to wear down his opponent. King Mickey has even wielded two keyblades at one time. Inn terms of magic, King Mickey in the past, has used the magic spell "Holy", which is the ultimate light magic. In Dream Drop Distance, Mickey even completely froze time completely to save Sora and Riku. Watch this epic fight between Sora and Mickey that shows my strategy for the fight.
Silly Debate: Mickey Mouse vs. Sora

)3rd Round: Rebuttals (Why your opponents opening attack wont cut it. )4th Round: Second Arguments (Another reason why your person would win. )5th Round: Rebuttals (Why your opponents second attack wont cut it. )So in summary, the first round is simply acceptance. The second round is, your opening attack, on how you would beat the opponent. The third round is why your opponents attack wont work. The 4th round, is your second plan of attack and how you would beat the opponent. The 5th and final round, is again why your opponents second attack will not work, and you also say your concluding statements. You can only use skills and powers, that this chracter already has. (i. e If batman were on of the players, you could not give him powers, such as invincibility, or any other power, since he is not a super human. He would only be able to use his tech and gadgets. ) Do your research and try to use all available resources for your character. Please, NO TROLLING. :)
Look at me. I'm the real deal!

I gleefully would like to conclude this pointless debate. I would like to apologize to my opponent if he feels I am trying to prject some sort of superiority image over him I am only trying to defend myself against a person who I have never met challenging me to a debate by reffering to as a A_hole and stating I have a dumb picture. You state that I am afraid to debate you on the issues, I am sure if you can propose a debate in which we can intellectually debate I will debate you but when your main argument is me being an a_hole or not conservative or the Browns being better than the steelers what do you expect me to do. I feel that you are a petty person for trying to discredit my name without ever even talking to me and if you want to debate me in the future please feel free to challenge me. I wish you the best, I really do but you need to work on your demonns before your hate consumes you. Sincerely, Fred Cheers!!!
Look at me. I'm the real deal!

"It is not my place to judge your preferences..." But you did judge me. You called me a "republicrat" or some such word. On balance, I am conservative. Some issues don't lend themselves to a conservative-liberal category. If you want to use "tradition" as a benchmark, then abortion can't be categorized in that way since it has always been practiced. The "radical republicans" wanted to expand free states, yet today preferential treatment for minorities is opposed by conservatives. These are not complex issues as you say. I suspect you are hiding behind a sense of intellectual superiority, or maybe it's just laziness or a lack of confidence in your ability to form a convincing argument. Or, maybe you believe you're too smart to waste your time on me.