British food is the worst in the world

I was able to learn about the culture of Britain and learn which foods I want to stay away from. So this is the final round, and I will prove why the Opposition should win this debate. Refutations"However, dining on British cuisine is not an option in Walnut Creek. In fact out of a total of 806,820 food outlets in the whole of the United States, 96,059 are Italian restaurants, 27,540 are Chinese restaurants and 26,088 are Mexican restaurants, but the sum total of British restaurants is 0. "True, British cuisine does not exist where I live in Walnut Creek. However, there are certainly places nearby Walnut Creek that are primarily British-themed. There is the 'CommonWealth Cafe and Public House' in Oakland. . http://www.cmonoakland.com...You can find 'THE CROWN' in Danville. . http://www.crownpub.com...There is the British pub/restaurant 'Redcoats' in Pleasanton. . http://www.redcoatspub.com...Lovejoy's Tea Room in San Francisco. . http://www.lovejoystearoom.com...And if you 'Google' British Restaurants, you'll find many more restaurants like the ones I have listed near you. Now my opponent claims that there are 0 British restaurants within the United States, and he lists one interesting source. At first sight, there is no 'British Restaurants' section within the webpage, leading one to assume there are 0 British-themed restaurants in the US. But, there are multiple other sections where British restaurants could fit in, such as 'Cafes' or 'Lunchroom' or even the massive section of nearly 250 thousand options, 'Restaurants. ' It is not safe to assume that there are 0 British restaurants in the US. Furthermore, just because your same source doesn't say 'Filipino Restaurants,' does that mean there are 0 such eating places in the United States? But then, if you were to assume few restaurants in a country means bad food, wouldn't Filipino food and British food be equally terrible, proving that British food is not the worst? There are too many contradictions within my opponent's argument and it is flawed. "The proof of the pudding is in the eating and if British food was worth eating it would be available beyond these shores in countries like the US, but there are no British restaurants in America because British food is the worst in the world. "This is just another assumption. Just because there are few such restaurants in America does not mean the food is horrible. Once again, take my example of Filipino restaurants. The Proposition has the Burden of Proof and has failed to sufficiently answer it. My opponent's entire case has been based on assumptions. He has conceded his first round arguments and has attempted to bring in a new argument that has been refuted. Last ArgumentChicken tikka masala is an extremely popular food among the world. Where does it come from? Well, of course, India. Actually. .. no, it doesn't. Chicken tikka comes from India, specifically Bangladesh. However, chicken tikka masala is a British food, invented in Glasgow in the late 1960's. Britain exports chicken tikka masala to India. "The first chicken tandoori on a British restaurant menu was at the Gaylord in Mortimer Street, London, in 1966 - the same restaurant where Not the Nine O'Clock News was invented in 1979. The recipe reached Glasgow shortly afterward and when, as the legend goes, a customer asked for some gravy to go with it, the chef improvised with tomato soup, spices, and cream. ". http://books.google.com...In 2001 Foreign Secretary Robin Cook declared that: "Chicken tikka masala is now a true British national dish, not only because it is the most popular, but because it is a perfect illustration of the way Britain absorbs and adapts external influences. "The Opposition has listed various other foods that are worse than British foods. I have also shown that not all British foods are bad, and that many foods (fish and chips) are popular and treasured in today's society. For these reasons, the Opposition should win this debate. Thank you.