Creationism vs big-bang/evolution Pro for bb/e Con for creation

You have not brought up proof for god or even creationism and have therefor killed your argument on "God is all powerful so therefore god." I stated In the rules for this debate that BoP or burden of proof is shared. Therefor you have to have a reasonable argument and proof that creationism is more logical to the evolution or the big bang theory. You can not say something like "They can coe exist because god is all powerful." That is not a shred of evidence. You even got the whole topic of the debate wrong. This is not about if they can coe exist it is about if creationism is more logical to evolution. Now on with the rest of the debate. I COMPLETELY dismantled your argument on "Explosions can not happen randomly." Refer to the cite I gave on thermodynamics and the big bang. Thermodynamics - https://en.m.wikipedia.org...... Big bang - http://www.skyandtelescope.com...... To further on: you do not know what a THEORY is. A scientific theory is the highest level of the science of hypothosis. Therefor a theory is something A: proven B: testable C: observed and still observable THAT is a theory. As I cited above in my last argument here is the site to this: http://www.notjustatheory.com... Saying that the big bang was not recorded does not mean it was not and still is observable. That theory that you are talking about is higher than the laws of science itself. The 8 eras of the big bang did happen. The higgs boson is not an alternative to your heinous "God" because it has been FOUND. Using gods powers as proof is not proof. Even more proof that the creation story is false is humans are said to be walking around the earth at the beginning, scientifically when dinosaurs rules the earth. If this is true then we would find in dirt layers dino bones mixed with human bones. But we do not. The flood in your "Bible" is false because if it happened we would find dirt layers and ground layers mixed in random areas effectively taking bones with them, yet dating in this fashion shows that there was no flood...AT ALL. Carbon dating - http://science.howstuffworks.com... It IS possible to assume we are living in a universal cycle that after every entropy event in abuniverse it implodes on itself. But you asked "well how did the energy to create the first universe come to be?" You are putting a proof standard that is impossible to achieve with modern day science. But just because we do not know why it happened does not mean god did it. You dont kneed god to explain the currently unexplainable just find a way to explain it. I never said the "you could say god was there and i could say the higgs was. Nothing is impossible." In fact I did not even imply it in the slightest. "The higgs they have now is still only a candidate." Uhh no it is not because we found the freaking thing and we deducted that that is the reason why the laws of thermal dynamics allow for spontaneous explosions and the creation of matter through heat and energy. All my points stand proud and proven. Where you have not given ANy proof at all of why creationism is more logical than the others. And stop using oppinions or be deducted points for falty use of an argument. It is there in my debate rules. The higgs boson is also the explanation to why all mass is and forms as it does. More about the higgs boson - http://science.howstuffworks.com...