BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Scabs must not benefit from collective bargaining deals

The central arguments from Pro are that "scabs" should not benefit from any deals which result from a strike based on the lack of solidarity and weakening of the movement to strike. Now on first glace this seems perfectly valid, and beyond that even obvious that it is wrong for workers to claim benefits from the result of a movement which they not only did not participate in but actually directly opposed. However consider the following - a worker who believes that the request for benefits are just and reasonable however is unwilling to go to strike as they feel that is unjust. They will support the union in any other way but will not refuse to work. This has happened locally years ago when hospital workers went on strike and I can personally remember having to cross a picket line with my family as my brother needed an operation. There were workers inside who did not want nor wish to cause strife and aggravation nor harm the cause of their fellow workers and they believed the benefit request was fair but they did not believe it was just to cause harm to others by refusing medical service for their personal gain. Is this justly treated by preventing them from the benefits of bargaining from a union which they had supported previously and paid their dues for some over a dozen years? Second, workers can refuse to strike because they feel the union is putting forth an unjust demand, an unreasonable claim. Yet towards the end an agreement could be reached where the same worker, seeing the reduced demand would actually agree that was in fact a just cause and now would have not opposed the strike. Is is also now in that a just case to again punish them? Third, consider a worker who simply can not afford to strike, they are living day to day, they need medical attention, shelter - it is beyond hard, they passed that some time ago. They can not strike, it is not an option for them. They want to support the union, the care deeply for their fellow workers, but they simply can not go without the pay for this period - it is not an option. Again, is it just then to deny them the benefits of bargaining for a union they have supported and will continue to support in any way they can. In short, Pro has painted a picture of workers who refuse to strike with a very shallow and one dimensional brush, almost to the point it is a caricature. The reasons for strike refusal are not so simply and thus neither can be the result of the action. While there is obvious merit to the resolution, it can not hold as a general principle in all cases for the reasons noted and the obvious myriad reasons which logically follow.
Scabs must not benefit from collective bargaining deals

Scabs, or "strike-breakers" as these perfidious parasites prefer to call themselves, are treacherous employees who cross official union picket lines and continue to work during strikes. In so doing, scabs dilute the impact of the industrial action, thus making it is easier for the management to resist workers' demands: the old adage "United We Stand, Divided We Fall" means absolutely nothing to these forelock-tugging class traitors. By refusing to show solidarity with their fellow workers, and instead collaborating with the management, the scabs know that they are in a no-lose situation. During the strike action, they will continue to be paid, whereas strikers will not, yet if the strike action forces the management into negotiations that result in an agreement to meet or some or all of the union's demands, the scabs will benefit from the better pay and conditions that the collective bargaining brought about. That's why the law should protect union members from selfish and unscrupulous strike-breaking scabs by ensuring that any deals unions negotiate on behalf of their members should not benefit non-members. Thank you.
is school fun

Friends. I can"t think of anything more luxurious than spending every day with my friends. When you leave school, meeting up with even one friend can take a lot of organising. Free knowledge. My school was free: it cost me and my parents "0. "0 for English, Maths, Geography, History, Art, and lots of other subjects. What a bargain! Learning can be really expensive when you leave school -- especially in the UK, where university has now become almost as expensive as buying a little house. Uniform. In England, school kids wear a uniform to school. Mine was blue. It wasn"t fashionable or particularly flattering, but it saved a lot of time in the mornings. Now it takes me ages to decide what to wear. Short days. My school days sometimes felt very long but they were, in fact, very short. The school day started at 9 and finished at 15.30. I used to think of "home time" as the beginning of the evening, but nowadays I think of 15.30 as the middle of the afternoon. Exercise. I"m not very good at sport, and I don"t really like it. But at school, sport was compulsory -- twice a week we had to play netball, hockey, rounders, etc. I now realise that this was a good thing! Without compulsory sport, you become very lazy
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

Things to consider: Fire - Passion / Shaper Water - Wisdom / Shape Electricity - Life / Energy Consciousness - Water / Reflection / -Projected- Subconscious - Below the surface of water / Inter-reflection / The heart of the Universe / -Projector- Light - The revealer / The observer The human body contains body heat, electrical stimulation and water throughout its processes. The volcano can exist on land, as well as in water. The human body releases its pressure and energy likened to a geyser. The planet body and the human body produce electromagnetic waves in conjunction with colors. The human mind interacts with colors in an interplay of contrast and relation. Electromagnetic waves are a form of communication, emotion and reaction. Humans communicate in the same manner as leaves communicate: electromagnetic waves. The colors of the electromagnetic waves are in this order: red, orange, yellow, green, sky blue, deep blue, purple and white. The entire planet as a whole, from core to space, is: red (fire), orange (less fire), yellow (much less fire), green (flora), sky blue (sky), deep blue (ocean), purple and white (Universe). The entire human spectrum is: anger, less anger, much less anger, love, wisdom, genius, a man beyond one's self. - It seems that colors and vibrations really make up the human experience, so it profoundly disturbs me how black and white people are today. It's like they either pick one color, or no color at all, when all colors are important to consider as stages of human life. Ever wonder why you erode into a premature being that gets stomped on by geniuses or people with an attitude in spite of their lack of intelligence? It's because you're eroding from imbalanced energy and natural forces. Your life is made by a conglomeration of sources, so by eliminating 90% of your life's faculties for 10% of what you desired, you are just preventing your becoming and just being equivalent to fecal matter, as they are dark and the passing of life - you live that when you don't leave your old ways.
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

My opponent has resorted to name calling which is may be one of the lowest form of intelligence.I am baffled Pro has given no rhyme or reason his arguments.How can there be wise men if EVERYONE IS STUPID per the title of this debate and your Round 2 arguments?This question went unanswered from earlier rounds. My opponent calls me an illiterate fool with no ground for it. There is no reading between the lines when you clearly state your point of emphasis in the title, and then choose to back that up (weakly) in the second round of debate by trying to confirm how people are stupid.You have failed this debate, and honestly, am extremely satisfied to watch you lose again. My emotions have built a prominent case FOR the intelligence of everyone.The only legitimate argument you have made for "everyone being stupid" is that you are being extremely stupid yourself from the start of this debate.You say you are arguing ideas you have refined and defined your entire life, yet you fail to mention ANY of those ideas. Comparing humans to nature around them isn't some profound idea. Stop trying to make yourself seem smart. It is utter nonsense, and incoherent ranting, followed up by insults.I have asked you to clarify many things in this debate as to avoid confusion. So if I wasn't "reading between the lines" or comprehending your "vastly intelligent" argument you had more than ample time to set the debate straight. To educate me on what subtle point you MAY have been trying to make.Instead I chose to work with the information at hand, as this was my only option because you have debated poorly. As I said, I have made my arguments using my view on the world and my emotions to show that I believe everyone is not stupid. This isn't some political structured debate. This is me proving you wrong...again.If you wish to make more debates in the future, please start to make sense first.
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

You are such a lost cause. You have no idea how to read context and keep asking for stupid nonsense, while calling my ideas, that are based on thoughts I refined and defined my whole life, in conjunction with things the wisest men of our time have talked about, so you have a whole army of man capable of changing this world for the losers that take it for granted against your tautology, mate. Get on my level, as I said before. Learn how to read in between the lines you illiterate fool.
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

Tell that to Tesla. You clearly don't understand that everything we know now, was not based on burden of proof - people that don't know how to deal with tricky topics use this excuse so they don't have to make it any easier to make a fool out of themselves. I'm not wasting my time to type up explanations, when you're not here to discuss - you're just here to wank off pointless wins that you politically cheeked your way into. Get on my level - or leave, you sorry fool.
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

Now my opponent has chosen not to clarify his statistics, meaning they hold no weight. They are to be disregarded until proven otherwise.He has also insulted me by clearly insinuating I am stupid. I do not know if this is supposed to be proof for his debate, or just a general insult. I would like Pro to clarify this next round.Pro seems to contradict himself by calling humans stupid, yet saying "STUPIDITY - a trait of humanity that cannot be denied; that has been distinguished by geniuses within the wise statements they have made over human history"This statement makes me question the exact premise, or if Pro did not understand the contradiction. If EVERYONE is stupid, then how are there geniuses?You can't have the best of both worlds.As you have made this DEBATE, you are obligated to prove how people are stupid, I did not ask you to provide factual information. You chose to do so with statistics. If you do not prove these statistics are true, then the voters and myself cannot credit them with any merit.This leads into my argument on why everyone is NOT stupid. While, yes, people may have actions derived from stupidity, our nature is not one of being stupid.We are an ever learning species who strive for knowledge. We would not have any of the inventions today if people were 'stupid'. There are many geniuses, as you mentioned who pioneer technology and thought-provoking ideas.While we are all human and equal in our rights, each human is different. each human sees those "colors and sound waves" differently. Meaning that in the textbook definition, some people have different intellectual views on things.To say everyone is stupid is an ignorant blanket statement. Trying to claim that people are dumb for not "seeing" things the way you do. How the universe is "meant" to be looked at.Lastly, my opponent claims I am trying to "win points". To this I say DUH. This website was made to give people a chance to spread ideas thought inspired debates. The creators of this website have put up a point system to generate competition among us and to add a level of excitement. If there is no excitement, joy, or reason to do something, then we should cease doing it. I am trying to win this debate. You are making an assertion that EVERYONE IS STUPID. This is wildly inaccurate and insults me. This is why I would like to show why you think EVERYONE is stupid.I believe we are not stupid by the fast amounts of technology, thoughts, and ideas people have on a daily basis. Scientists, Mathematicians, Astronauts, Chemical Engineers, Politicians, Philosophers....all of these people do great wonders for the human mind. Stretching the possibilities of our knowledge. Inspiring and educating all of us to make sure we do not become stupid.I find no justification in your premise.
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

Then let it be questionable. I'm not here to give you sources, when they are double-edged nuances that can be interchangeably abused by naive fools like yourself. I said what I said - if you want to keep hiding behind BOP, when you are arguing stupidity - STUPIDITY - a trait of humanity that cannot be denied; that has been distinguished by geniuses within the wise statements they have made over human history, just because you want to win another debate to then act like points matter on a site that is full of colloquially illiterate buffoons and trolls like you. You have no integrity or responsibility towards ideas. All you do is suspect, ask more pointless questions, force a position onto me so you don't have to make one yourself. Then when you try to, you use subjectivity to argue objectivity, like you were doing a great job at constructively responding - when in all actuality, you were simply doing exactly what stupid people do and most religious people do when they cannot win a discussion. You already lost by ignoring the deep things I wrote about the Universe and the colors, just to bring my intellectual discussion down to your ignorant level. Why don't you start discussing the sound waves and colors I mentioned, instead of making a complete mockery out of yourself by arguing human stupidity; telling me to prove that people are in fact stupid, because you never could discuss in the first place. All you do is resort to political nonsense that I know through and through - I see right through you, because all you are is gas.
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

First:I would like to point out non of my opponents 'facts' are cited. There are survey numbers of "50% of people don't know the sun is a star" I would like to see proof of this before I believe it.As well, you are confusing lack of book smarts, with stupidty. I would like a clear definition of Stupidty (I apologize, I should asked last round) But I do not agree that lack of science knoweldge (in the case of this survey) is a sign of stupidity.**So again I ask, please cite the source of this poll, otherwise it has no credit. And please define stupidity.Further rebuttals:-Believing in a religion is not a sign of stupidity. Faith is a human emotion that has no basis in one's IQ. -I would like proof of these tyrants and martyrs who are starting wars. Many wars have been started over the right to land, not because someone just seemingly wanted to go to war.-I would like to you to prove someones "gratefulness" over anothers as a human being.-I would like you to prove that parents are ALLOWING their children to be abused. I would assume most children are kidnapped from their parents and forced into sexual slavery.-I can also safely assume you have not gone to every website and found out there is more good than bad. While the internet can be a breeding ground for harm, there are many insightful places to go.You can apply for schools, job, look up facts, how-to's to assist you in your daily life, or just general entertainment from your social media website of choice. The internet is a great place to communicate and play games with your friends when you are not with them. I do not agree with, nor am I content with anything you have laid out in your arguments. Your "facts" are not cited, so their validtity is questionable as of now. (I could say the flying spaghetti monster is the caused of all harm in the world. It holds as much ground as your statements as of now because you have not proven your facts and statistics.)There is no political trickery or deceit. I am merely questioning how you feel people, as a whole, are stupid.If you choose not to define stupidty, I will do so now. Stupidity:the state of being foolish or unintelligent : the condition of being stupidhttp://www.merriam-webster.com...Pro must prove (as BoP is solely on Pro) that people are always acting in stupidity.
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

Many do not think twice about stupidity versus intelligence because they, themselves, are too stupid to understand intelligence, as many wonder why they are still working at the same job, paying the same bills, going through the same cycle over and over until their life is this dry leaf that barely has any life left for it to muster, while those you thought were doing nothing with their lives; the ones you made fun of, to scoff at in envy; end up being the ones that control your life now. People prove their stupidity everyday, by not learning; by hating knowledge; by skimming communication; by shortening life; by using absolutes like "I live life to the fullest", "I already know", "You are a...", "Because I said so", "I don't care", "Nobody cares", "Wow you are amazing, but I don't get it", or some other form of baseless way of communicating their stupidity, while denying it at the same time. There's a reason why every time - there's not one time - where one man or a small group of extremely intuitive individuals come out of nowhere to influence the ignorant mass towards a better future. Otherwise, it's just the mass stupidity influencing a world, which gives power to those that do not want to be good individuals; but evil individuals which abuses their control to prey on the mass. Want more examples, the people which run our countries into the ground, are the people we voted into office - there's no excuse for this. More? More than 50% people do not know the sun is a star. More than a billion people believe in the bible in a literal sense. The children of our time act the way they do, because they either learned it from their parents, or learned it from other kids, which learned it from it from other parents. The children with high potential and intelligence, are kicked down by these neanderthals. Want more? Wars would cease to exist if so many people weren't gullibly following tyrants and martyrs. Wars have not ceased, so clearly idiots still are pushing forward the dreams of a mad man that is otherwise powerless without an army. Want more? People are demonizing the great, and initializing the ungrateful. Well, here's more. Child sex rings. Parents allowing children to be abused, hurt and worse because they lack the attention span and the intellectual span to prevent these matters from occurring in the first place. The internet is a global reflection of humanity - what do you see on the internet more often than not? Trolls. Psychopaths. Idiots. Crazies. Children. There's not very many well-minded individuals on the internet, and when they do show their faces, they either get a rainfall of down votes or a rainfall of up votes - either way, it's because they are blatantly better than the mass population. Do I have to keep going down the list, or are you content that I am right, or are you going to feel inclined to deny all of this with some political trickery that people with no ounce of humanity and integrity use when they cannot win a discussion any other way?
Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

Pro has claimed he will prove "how stupid everyone is, not to be mean,( but to be honest. )"His opening argument makes me believe stupidity is derived from people not making or understanding the vast amount of choices set before them in today's world. "It's like they either pick one color, or no color at all, when all colors are important to consider as stages of human life"As Pro stated he will prove this, BoP remains solely with Pro to prove the stupidity of people as a whole. Good Luck.
I will not contradict myself

Pro, you did not seem to address my requests for clarification. I feel that these are important and, in the interests of a fulfilling debate, I'd ask that you address these since, technically, the questions to which they relate aren't answered until you do. I will post those requests again for clarity: #2 - Your decision is made prior to the swap/torture/release. So you are making with your mind in your body. After you make the decision, he will then release the body-mind pair you decided to release, and torture the other. So you can decide to release what will be your body-other mind or other body-your mind. Which would you have released? #5 - The car is completely disassembled, even the engine, into its most basic constituent parts. Then it is reassembled using those same exact parts. Is it the same car? #7 - In line with the clarification above, this has nothing to do with the swapped minds scenario. Given that, I will take "I would not go through [with] the operation" as your answer unless you object.#9 - The question is in regards to actions where I don't have a choice, even a choice whether or not I want to engage in it. If I have no choice, am I still morally responsible? Thank you. In light of the four restatements above, I will limit the new questions this round to 6. New Questions 1. Similar to #4 above: Consider an event that no person is responsible for, like a tornado. Also consider that this tornado destroys a house and kills the family inside and that no one is responsible for that causal connection. That is, no one is responsible for the fact that the tornado destroyed the house and killed the people. Is it then logical to conclude that no human is responsible for the death of the family? 2. Similar to #5 above: Can the logical principle above be generalized? That is, can we say that for any event X for which no one is responsible; and a causal connection "X causes Y" for which no one is responsible; can we say, then, that no human is responsible for Y? 3. You are courier delivering important medical supplies to help combat a disease epidemic. On your way to the delivery site, you come to a fork in the road. You know that the path on the left is clear, but longer. You estimate that, out of the 1,200 victims, 800 (2/3) will die before you can get to the site. The path on the right is shorter, but not always clear. If it is clear (1/3 chance), then you can get there in time to save everyone, if it is not clear (2/3 chance) then you won't get there in time to save anyone and all 1,200 will die. Let's assume that the numbers here are accurate and beyond questioning, which path do you take? 4. Does God define what is moral? That is, does the moral quality of an act derive solely from God's will? 5. If you can save someone from harm at absolutely no cost to yourself, are you morally obligated to do so? 6. In continuation of #5, if you deliberately refrain from helping the person, and sit idly by as they come to harm, are you, in any way, morally responsible for that harm?