There are no contradictions in the bible

This debate has been truly challenging. 1. Scientific a)You begin by dealing with the day-age theory. You accept this as a possibility hence a win. a1)We're debating bible contradictions and not the infinite mind of God. "Why would it take that long for God to create anything? " Feel free to discuss this with me but this question is inappropriate for this debate. a2)Website which you should visit to understand this view: . http://godandscience.org... a3)Isaiah 55:9 b)The Gap Theory holds that the ages of evolution (the periods and eras of "modern science") occurred before the six days of biblical Creation, but were part of the creative process of God. These ages were then terminated by a global cataclysmic event, followed by a period of replenishing the earth, according to the following instructions of God in Genesis: "And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth" (Genesis 1:28 KJV). c)"Ehh. .. I haven't provided anything that isn't a biblical contradiction. "Yes you have! The age of the earth according to the Bible might be anything above 6000 (mankind existed for about 6000 years according to Usshers chronology). Conclusion: You must prove that the young earth creationists are right and all other groups which interpret the bible differently are wrong. If you can do this then we can say that the Bible most likely says that the earth is 6000 years old. 2. Historical a)Heres a link which proves Usshers chronology to be incorrect: . http://www.scribd.com... b)"There is clear archaeological evidence from et-Tell of the biblical Conquest at Ai"m93samman b1). http://www.biblicalchronologist.org... b2)This doesn't mean that its an established fact that biblical conquest happened at et-Tell but its a probability. c)"But, that leaves the biblical location in contradiction with the historical location. "You have the burden of proof. What artifact at et-Tell disproves the biblical conquest of Ai? Even if there is the bible still doesn't contradict history because we don't know if the city of Ai was located at et-Tell. Conclusion:I have proven Usshers chronology to be incorrect hence theres no contradiction. There is a contradiction if you can prove me that the biblical conquest happened in et-Tell (according to the bible) and if you then give me evidence which tells us that the biblical conquest couldnt have happened at et-Tell. 3. Internal a)You haven failed to refute the examples given in round 2 and 4. You tried to refute the example given in round 2 "Moreover, the example given about my opponent writing a biography and then citing Barack Obama's election doesn't apply because they are two different books". However the Bible is a collection of books written by different authors at different times at different locations. I expand on this idea in the second example. Wherefore theres no contradiction. b)"How is that something you can even allow through your brain? ! "Read the arguments in the link below. c). http://www.echoofeden.com... Conclusion:It isn't plagiarism, because nobody involved in the writing took any credit for the account. The concept of intellectual property is VERY recent - in the ancient world, the goal was not to collect royalties or build a career, but to record knowledge. Most likely Isaiah was the source document for the II Kings compilation. See also the last chapter of 2 Chronicles and the corresponding passage in Jeremiah. 4. Logical a)The original argument has been refuted "Apparently, EITHER God or Satan inspired David in fighting Israel" b)"Is that sufficient to explain why it doesn't make sense that God and Satan would work together? Satan is treacherous, deceptive, and amoral. "God is almighty and Satan cant do anything without Gods permission hence i win. However I think you wont give up this argument so i quote "For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts. "Isaiah 55:9. Conclusion: You've presented no contradiction concerning this section with the exception of round 1. 5. Numerical a)"To conclude, my opponent has been unintentionally missing the bullseye. "m93samman b)Ive proven that the NIV translation is incorrect concerning this issue but that if we take the correct translation of KJV theres no contradiction. Conclusion:The NIV translation is incorrect. This is an example explaining why its incorrect ". Lets say the word qwer could be defined as 5 and ten. If previously qwer meant 5 and theres another sentence which would make sense if you use 10 would a good translation use 5 again? ". The NIV says yes hence the contradiction but KJV says no wherefore we have no contradiction. Also Ive completely ignored "the measure of capacity changed after the captivity" argument because I dont have to regard this in order to prove my point. Points I find interesting or amusing: 1. I would have said that the NIV translation is correct (and not KJV) if I had chosen to expand on the "the measure of capacity changed after the captivity" argument. 2. If the measure of capacity changed i win because theres no contradiction but if it didn't then i still win because that means the NIV translation concerning this issue is incorrect as I have proven (same word is used which has more then one meaning hence you must translate in a way that doesn't cause contradictions,see the example i gave) 3. The contradiction you made still exists because you were implying that God cant control Satan by "Isn't Satan the one that tricked Adam into eating that apple? " but before that you said "God and the Devil/Satan are clearly not equivalent". 4. You seem to get more and more emotional concerning the "Internal" section. Read again what you wrote and then try to tell me that you didn't go from cool and composed style to a style where I can almost hear you speak. 5. Concerning the scientific section the two interpretations were already present in the first round (the links i provided) 6. I was supposed to respond in Tuesday and not Monday but I completely fail at understand my families plans (not only that I thought that will be going to Riga and not somewhere else XD).