It should be legal to own a gun

DEFINITIONS- Definition of gun- a : a piece of ordnance usually with high muzzle velocity and comparatively flat trajectory b : a portable firearm (such as a rifle or handgun) c : a device that throws a projectile https://www.merriam-webster.com... POINT 1 ---------- People living out in the country have no cops nearby to defend them, & need a way of defense. There also is no guarantee of when the police will show up or if at all. They may be busy. Maybe they can't find you. Maybe dispatch loses track of your emergency. http://dfw.cbslocal.com... POINT 2 ---------- The physically disabled and women have the right to equalize a situation against someone much stronger or bigger than they are. Headline- "Mom who killed home invader: 'It was either him or me, and I wasn't going'" https://www.wsbtv.com... POINT 3 ---------- -Because those who want no one to have guns can't even begin to tell us how to disarm 33,000 gangs with millions of members. https://en.m.wikipedia.org... POINT 4 ---------- Lawbreakers will not care what the law says and still will have a gun. Disarming law abiding citizens is nonsensical. POINT 5 ---------- If someone broke into your house and raped your mom, wife, and/or your daughter right in front of you at gunpoint and you knew that you having a gun would have prevented it, you'd look back forever and wonder if you could have stopped it had you been armed. POINT 6 ---------- Illegals in sanctuary cities and states are let loose despite having a firearm. They don't get MORE rights than me. https://www.heritage.org... POINT 7 ---------- Claiming the police and the system are systematically oppressing blacks, & then demanding blacks disarm, is nonsensical. This is an exercise in fundamental common sense. Liberals claim that the police systematically single out and oppress the black community. How can one then turn around and say that disarming the black community of its guns is "Social Justice"??? https://www.sciencedaily.com... https://en.m.wikipedia.org... POINT 8 ---------- Gun grabs empower corrupt governments rather than the people. If there is almost no chance of a normal, everyday citizen killing anyone with a gun, disarming them can only have the motive of corruption and desire to play "Big Brother" to the citizenry. Why do you need our guns if we aren't murdering anyone with them? POINT 9 ---------- There is little chance of being killed by a gun statistically, so the "gun homicides are out of control" narrative is a flat out lie. There were 11,208 gun homicides in 2013. There are about 320,000,000 people in the United States. Let's do the math. 11,208÷320,000,000 =0.000035025 There is a 0.000035025% chance of getting killed by a gun in a homicide. "Gun violence is most common in poor urban areas and frequently associated with gang violence, often involving male juveniles or young adult males." Gangs will not disarm no matter what the law says, and if you take away gang violence, almost no one gets killed by a gun in a homicide. 1,358 people were killed in what is defined as a "mass shooting" in 2015. 1,358÷320,000,000 =0.0000042438 This means there is a 0.0000042438% chance of being killed in a mass shooting. This is literally comparable to the odds of being struck by lightning, that is to say, almost no chance. 1÷700,000 =0.0000014285 According to the CDC, gang homicides accounted for roughly 8,900 of 11,100 gun murders on average in 2010 and 2011. That means that there were just 2,200 non gang-related firearm murders in both years in a country of over 320,000,000 legal citizens. 2,200÷320,000,000 =0.000006875 This means there is a 0.000006875% chance that I am killed by a gun in a non gang related homicide. https://en.m.wikipedia.org... https://news.nationalgeographic.com... https://www.bungie.net... So what's the point? 1)Normal, law abiding citizens, are statistically, extremely responsible with guns. There's no non-corrupt reason to disarm innocent, law abiding citizenry. 2)Non law abiding people don't obey laws, including gun laws. So gun laws only disarm innocent, law abiding citizenry, making them soft targets for non-law abiding criminals. 3)Disarming law abiding citizens is pointless and wrong.