Noone can beat Chuck Norris.

I wonder if I provoked that argument or if that was your plan all along and I am a victim of clever debate trickory. Well witchever the case I have this to deal with now so..... ---------------- Nothing is real unless I percieve it: ------------------ Very well, I perceive Chan and Norris as they are in the videos. an old man who can kick but, and an old man who reads congressional bills. this percieved Chan is clearly more awsome than Norris. Plus in any respective 'universe' for the various charcters they have played, Chan has fought on crazy awsome levels higher than Norris has. Norris has been a texas ranger fighting with realistic fighting stats, a cammando, and a figment of a kids imagination who still faught realisticly. In the movie 'Medailion' and 'Tuxiedo' and 'Forbidon Kingdom' chan fights on levels of awsome before unkown to man. I challange my opponent to provide one video clip of norris doing something as visually impressive Chan in any of those three films. ------------------- There is a small chance, however Improbable the Incredible will happen: ------------------- Yes indeed, and there is a small chance a monkey could randomly type hamlet, but if it does though that is possible for all intense and purposes we should believe I trained it type hamlet as that is more rational. It is possible I will go to mars tomarrow but we should believe I wont because nothing is exceptional about tomorrow that the aliens would have kidnapped me then as opposed to yesterday. It is possible that the 'Chuck Norris facts' are true but since we saw it was fact that Norris endorsed Huckabee for president and that 'Chuck Norris dosnt endorse, he tells america how its gonna be' yet huckabee lost to Mcain http://en.wikipedia.org...(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2008 And after loseing Mcain and Romney did not suffer from roundhouse kicks to the face, witch surely would have been on the news or at least killed Mcain so he vanishes from it. It seems Chuck Norris facts are not just improbable, but blatently proven false. However Jackie Chan has yet to be proven false that he can breack your arms with Cool Wip. So the possibilty of incredible still apply to him. ----------------- We can be totally sure of nothing: ----------------- No one cares, because we can be sure enough. ------------------------ Nothing is proven so chuck dosnt exist and cant be defeted: ------------------------ More appropriatly, One cannot prove things to be one way and not the other. we can address though all the possibilties. eithor.... a) Chuck Norris exist and so does Jackie Chan. there in those videos. Chan would have beat him last round. b) Chuck Norris does not exist exept of a figment of your imagination. and if that is true I can kill him by pounding you into forgetting him or untill you die. c) Chuck Norris based on the 'Facts' that cant be true because Mitt Romney is not in hiding, is exist as an idea, and the shear awsomeness of this idea could eaisely be defeted by Batman http://en.wikipedia.org... who is exist by the same virtues and Batmans is way more awsome than Norris. But Batman will be my contender next round. I will explain why Batman would defeat Norris then, but this round I am my own contender to defeat Norris as this round your method argument portrais Norris as a figment of your imagination. and You think therefore you are so Norris clearly exist there. There are a number of ways I can kill you, and by proxy the Norris of your imagination. I could a) shapen my sword that right now is just for looks in my room cause swords are cool! then procead to your house and cut of your skull. this will be easy as you are tap danceing right now. b) give my insane CIA cusine a phone call and tell him to pick you up, you might be a terrorist. they will waterboard you untill you admitt you no longer acknoledge the existance of the Norris and thus Norris goes completely into oblivion and by proxy is defeted by me using no more than my hands to dial the button on a phone. c) you know the only way for a bare fist fight between me and the figment norris of your head is for his hands alone and not yours to participate in this fight. So I keep punching you but because Norris is a figment of your mind his punches and roundhouse kicks never hurt me. You keep screaming at me that Norris is roundhouse kicking me as I punch you but I ignore that and your knows starts to bleed. you cry, then announce the Norris's defeat. d) I strangle you in your sleep. norris is no more. A Norris that exist the way you described in round 2 would be beaten by sending him further to oblivion. and I have listed mearly 4 ways of doing that, one could go on forever about how to hypothetically do that as the task of sending a figment to oblivion is an easy one. So Chan clearly won last round if Norris is real, if the Norris that is fighting is not and one last round then that Norris clearly was defeated by me this round. and next round Batman will wipe the floor with him, and the round after that I will pick some other literary 'Mary Sue' to destroy him. http://en.wikipedia.org...