The US "moon landing" was fake

Well. This isn't quite what I expected: but I guess this gives me more room for my conclusion, even if I don't have anything to debunk as far as I know. But first I'm going to touch lightly on the one argument I did not have time to debunk: the spotlight in the visor. The object clearly isn't a spotlight. I am, as my profile states, a theatrical actor, and I've been involved in theatre for most of my life, perhaps 14 years of 19. In all my years of being near a stage I've never seen a stage light that looks anything like what the visor suggests. It's round, or spherical, an unusual shape. The light dock isn't aligned with the general angel of the stagelight and we'd see more cables if this would be an actual light that is hanging from some odd support beam in a 360° set. The barn doors would be idiotic as it would be more prone to cast a clear spotlight and the barn doors are even pointless as barn doors, being longer than the width of the light. the spotlight itself is aiming away from the scene indicating it should be turned off as the shadows from the other astronaut suggest, making it redundant. I think this isn't a reflection, but a mark on the helmet itself where Conrad would touch the visor to open and close it. You can see a similar smudge on a few other images from other angles, and I've sourced most of them[1-7, zooming required]. Now, to the conclusion:Ladies, gentlemen, other esteemed readers of this debate. I restate that the 1969 moon landing was the pinnacle of technology, nay, the pinnacle of the history of the past. My opponent and I have been passing the ball of truth back and forth, attempting to uncover what really happened that summer day in 1969. My opponent has brought up a number of arguments and I, to my best wisdom, have debunked all of them in part or full. However, I cannot say pro had done the same. As of now my opponent has not fully debunked third party evidence, mostly attempting to dismiss them. He has not managed to scientifically prove that the van allen belt is an impassable barrier, nor did he fully prove that the artic moon rocks and the apollo moon rocks are one and the same. I however have shown, and due to my opponent vanishing without notice for the last round it is still unresolved, that in 1969 it was not possible to fake the moon landing. If the film was slowed down in order to produce the moon gravity we would have to have a continuous film far larger than was available at that time, and if the film was not slowed down and wires were used then the moon dust displayed on the film is a clear violation of natural earthly physics. This is just one of many paradoxes that an earth studio would experience in production of the often hours worth of footage. Out of the two, I stand that it was more likely that we could have landed on the moon than to fake seven missions, one of which failed, for minimal gain when only a single one would have been more than enough, and even faking that one would have been impossible with the film technology existent at that time. Did I without doubt prove a moon landing? Did my opponent prove that it was made in a studio? No. I think neither of us did perfectly fulfil this magical undefined burden of proof. That is entirly up to whatever voters that will lay down their judgement. I however do feel that I managed to defend a moon landing better than my opponent defended a moon hoax. Dear readers, the moon is a beautiful gem that hangs in ease above our head, shimmering in its leisure. It is ever stable as it floats around the blue pearl in near perfect harmony. I stand and believe that I have proven that this gemstone has not been in isolation for all these years. I stand that it still holds dearly onto the treasured equipment and the bleached out flags we gave it 40 years ago. I stand that the Apollo moon missions, each and every one, were a real documented event in human history. With the mellow tones of Frank Sinatra, I leave you. I thank my opponent for a wonderful and challenging debate and hope to meet him some other day for a new topic. I wish you all a good night and wonderful evening under the moon. 1 http://www.hq.nasa.gov...2 http://www.hq.nasa.gov...3 http://www.hq.nasa.gov...4 http://www.hq.nasa.gov...5 http://www.hq.nasa.gov...6 http://www.hq.nasa.gov...7 http://www.hq.nasa.gov...http://www.youtube.com...