Whites are superior to blacks, and blacks are dragging us down.

Its important to state that you compared a select minority of each race to compare to each other(extremely biased). Therefore I will not explain why that selected individual of the white race is superior to a successful black. By the way some of those blacks you listed have more white ancestry. Furthermore the black average IQ in America is 85 while the average of whites is 102. Having a high IQ is a good predictor of success, not just in education jobs and training. But also in stable marriage and family structure. low IQ on the other hand predicts many negative outcomes. Including child abuse, crime, poor health, having a child out of wedlock, getting a divorce before 5 years of marriage. The negatives I just listed are what the black race is best at. I will now explain what makes up these IQ differences. Whites have bigger and better functioning brains therefore they have higher IQ's. Blacks being an evolutionary dead-end have 15-20% smaller brains, like I said before this is abundant with IQ. Mean relative breadth(width) of a skull is found to be associated with executive ability, we find that all Blacks, Hottentots, and the Australians races are dolichocephalic, and all the better functioning races are mesocephalic or brachycephalic. The index, for instance, among the Mongoloids, from 71 to 90; among the Blacks, from 69 to 76; and among the Australians, from 71 to 71.5. The widest Blacks skull doesn't reach the average of the Germans; nor does the widest Australian skull reach the average of the Blacks. Notice the dolichocephalic features in the congoid(Blacks), capoid(hottentots), and the Australoid(Australians) races. While the Mongoloid and Caucasoid tend more toward brachycephalic features. http://new4.fjcdn.com... believing all humans are the same _580a6d99fe5b4fa2ba680f0141f72e8a.jpg The amount of prognathism is another marked criterion. One method of expressing this is by the distances from the opening of the ear to the roots of the upper teeth and to other parts of the head. Among Caucasians, the distance to the base of the upper incisors is 99, but among Blacks, it averages 114. On the contrary, the average distance to the top of the head is, among Caucasians, 112; but among Blacks, 110. The distance to the upper edge of the occipital bone is, among Caucasians, 104; among Blacks, 104. These particular measurements prove that the Blacks possesses more face and particularly of jaws, and less brain above. Other measurements comply a similar result; and show, also, that the development of the posterior brain, in relation to the anterior, is greater in the Blacks. Prognathism is otherwise expressed by means of the "facial angle", 11 or general slope the face from the forehead to the jaws, when compared with a horizontal plane. Among the Blacks, it averages only 670; among the Hottentots and Bushmen, 600, and among the Australians, 680. The native productions of Africa, suited to the wants of man, are countless. So why haven't blacks developed their own civilizations without foreign help? Wine is produced from the sap. The date palm thrives throughout all the desert regions, wherever a moderate supply of water can be had. It furnishes the bread of the desert, and supports not only man, but camel and horse. South of the Sudan, the Eaobab takes the place of the date. Here abounds, also, the oil palm. Other vegetable resources of the continent are the butter-tree and the doom-palm. There are two native cereals, Negro millet and Kaffir-corn, which supply extremely rich food. There are also the edible earth-nuts bread-roots and, which are satisfactory to supply the daily food of whole villages. The domesticable and useful animals of Africa are not inconsiderable in number. The continent is well stocked with fur-bearing animals. The quagga and the mountain zebra speak for the horse family in the southern parts; while Burchell's zebra is widely scattered over the plains as far as the west coast; and the aboriginal wild donkey is indigenous to north eastern Africa. The domestic horse has not been introduced into inter-tropical Africa. The single-humped camel, is employed over all north Africa; and the Indian buffalo has also been introduced in the north. Other native bovine and ovine species are extensively distributed, the antelope and the giraffe belonging exclusively to Africa. Lastly, the African elephant ranges abundantly from Cape Colony throughout central Africa; but, strange to say, it has never been, like the Indian elephant, domesticated. It is pertinent to inquire if such a continent, so outfitted with resources for food, clothing, transportation, intercommunication and commerce, is a situation well suited of an indigenous race. Are these the conditions under which the grade of humanity, driveling in filth and wretchedness on the banks of the Congo or the Zambesi; of western Asia and Europe, the same type has risen perpetually through all grades of advancing civilization? The indigenous African has nowhere taken more than the first steps toward civilization.