Taoism is the One True Religon

I enjoyed getting to learn more about Taoism. As my opponent conceded in the last round, I do not have much to add to what I have already said. However, I would like to address the "list of my mistakes" that my opponent created:A. You'll find that in this debate, my opponent seemed to offer two similar resolutions. I understand that my opponent mistakenly left his resolution out of the headline, and I took this into consideration when giving my arguments. This does not make much of a difference, however, due to the fact that my opponent was unable to provide good reasoning and argument to think that either of his resolutions were true. In any case, he was unable to carry the burden of proof that went along with the claims he made. The accusation that I did either did not read or ignored my opponent's prefatory statement is completely false. As I have already stated, my opponent did not give any warrant for any of the claims that were made by him in this debate. B. As Con, my job in this debate was to refute my opponent's arguments, and that is exactly what I did. I'm indifferent to whether it was philosophical or popular Taoism that I was arguing against. The point is that it was my opponent's arguments which I was refuting, so any refutation I made would have been against the specific type of Taoism that my opponent was arguing in favor of. I see no issue here. So, rather than me not being "astute enough to comprehend" my opponent's words, my explanation would simply be that it was my opponent, if anyone, who failed to distinguish what he was arguing for. As I said, all of my refutations were based solely on my opponent's arguments, not on any misunderstanding between different types of Taoism. C. I don't recall a "proof" ever being offered. However, my opponent readily admits that "it's a questionable and all-too-fuzzy statement" so it seems to me that there is no issue here. D. I responded to this assertion several times throughout the course of the debate. You'll recall that I gave evidence (in the form of various independent sources) that Taoism is less than 3,000 years old, and from this I showed that it is absurd to think of Taoism as an independent basis for logic, for this would imply logic itself is less than 3,000 years old. My opponent then demonstrates his lack of understanding of the concept of a properly basic belief and attempts to claim Taoism as a properly basic belief. As this debate is already over and my opponent does not have any more rounds to respond, I will not go into detail in addressing properly basic beliefs and why Taoism couldn't be considered one. However, if my opponent has questions about this I invite him to message me and I will gladly explain it. E. Again, my opponent fails to recognize that Taoism, being less than 3,000 years old, cannot stand as a basis for anything that is older than 3,000 years old (i. e. logic and moral values). My opponent, to be correct, would first need to show that logic and moral values are less than 3,000 years old. This is, of course, false, but even if my opponent were able to show this, he would still have all of his work ahead of him in showing that Taoism was the one true basis for logic and morality. F. Here, my opponent seems to deny the age of Taoism. Recall that I provided three independent sources in the second round which verified that Taoism is less than 3,000 years old. I invite my opponent and any readers to take a look at these sources and/or research the matter on their own. My opponent then somehow finds a way to compare Taoism to Bigfoot, which I won't event attempt to respond to. My opponent concludes by providing his own arguments (or arguments he thinks I ought to have given) against Taoism, which I suppose is alright as he has already conceded. In conclusion, then, my opponent gave five arguments in support of his claim at the beginning of the debate. I refuted each of these five arguments. My opponent ultimately conceded the debate, and as such we can reasonably conclude that Taoism is not the one true religion.