I Propose A More Logical Theoretical Cosmological Model Of The Macro Universe

I am not affiliated with any institution of higher learning, nor am I employed as an astrophysicist, astronomer, or cosmologist. Still, I have studied and observed the universe for well over half a century, and over the years I found myself growing increasingly frustrated with the academicians of astrophysics and cosmology as they moved farther and farther away from rational, reasonable ... simple theories, seeking instead ever more complex, exotic (and dare I say it) magical solutions, and abandoned basic science in the process. Unable to present my model in a serious scientific periodical, I decided to send the model to individual scientists. Tedious, to be sure, but reasonably effective, as eventually over 7,000 worldwide were exposed, and many responded. An early version was sent to the Hayden Planetarium, and I was pleasantly surprised to receive an email the following day from Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Over a period of months Neil was very gracious, helpfully pointing out weaknesses in my hypotheses and theories and what theories must have to be taken seriously. They must :1. Not conflict with established laws. 2. Include a mathematical description.3. Be falsifiable.4. Be able to be tested by experiment and/or observation.5. Make predictions of previously unobserved phenomena not already inherently predicted by the Standard Model.He did concede that math was not necessary as long as no new (non-existent) physics were being invoked. He was not amused when I pointed out that String Theory was on shaky ground mathematically, had made no predictions (at that time) and was not falsifiable, yet was considered a serious theory. He was even less amused when I mentioned Hawking Radiation, while on firmer ground mathematically, could not be tested. I still like him. :) Predictions:Hypothesis A:Space has always existed, and hosted 'local' violent events prior to the Big Bang.Background: Pre existing space should still retain faint ripples from any phenomena immediately prior to our Big Bang that were violent enough to cause massive shock waves in the fabric or medium of space, and these ripples should manifest as subtle patterns in the CMBR.Similar to the Penrose et al. study, but we take it a step farther and look for echoes of collisions with greater amplitude resulting from far more massive collisions (and with perhaps far more subtle effects) than the comparatively 'minor' collisions Penrose has suggested occurred.Prediction:Patterns in the CMBR should show very faint overlapping ripples correlating to collisions of black holes containing variable masses in excess of trillions of solar masses prior to the Big Bang, but should not show patterns in the CMBR indicative of identical, comparatively minor violent events.Ancillary Prediction:The CMBR should not show subtle patterns indicative of prior identical Big Bangs as those specific waves/ripples should have propagated beyond our field of view long before our BB occurred.Hypothesis B:An infinite number of non-overlapping finite universes exist throughout infinite space, separated by vast and relatively consistent distances, and each universe contains exactly the same mass, and shares the same physics, as our Hubble volume. They are distinguishable only by relative age/evolution and their distribution of matter/energy. Prediction:The apparent faint patterns, characterized as 'bruising', believed to be detected (Feeney et al.) in the CMBR should not be the result of, or indicative of collisions with:1. hyper-expanding universes, each with their own uniquely different physical laws, matter/energy composition and structure,2. hyper-expanding universes with the same physical structure and laws as our universe, 3. 'glancing' blows from either type of universe (conforming or non-conforming),4. residual shock waves from our own prior Big Bangs, 5. or residual shock waves from other massive collisions, internal or external to the Hubble volume.These should instead be indicative of shock waves proceeding in advance of, and emanating from, distant identical but staggered Big Bangs occurring at the appropriate times and distances to create the varied patterns observed in the CMBR.Ancillary Prediction:Furthermore, we should find that a closer examination of the CMBR with greater sensitivity (creating better computer algorithms, employing the variety of different instruments currently deployed with their differing capabilities of detection, doing experiments specific to the model's predicted parameters) may reveal additional faint patterns beyond those discovered by Feeney, et al. caused by the shock waves of other identical 'bangs' external to the Hubble volume, differing only by frequency, and strength, relative to time and point of origin.Hypothesis C:All black holes are physical 3-dimensional structures, rather than infinitely small/infinitely dense zero-dimensional structures, and will rotate surface matter in excess of c. The top angular velocity (spin) is only constrained by achieving sufficient rotational angular momentum to overcome it's own gravity and only under specific minimum conditions of mass, volume and surface area.Background: Einstein's mathematical work on collapsing bodies, current ergosphere and frame-dragging studies, and many other experiments show a black hole's gravitational force is sufficient to collapse normal space and exempt itself from space's normal limit to acceleration.This hypothesis also requires a radical departure from the questionable and problematic mathematical presumption of the infinitely small/infinitely dense 'singularity' and instead presumes a universal 'max' point where matter/energy can no longer be further compressed. This logical presumption stems from the reality that black holes are 'here'. If they could actually infinitely compress a finite or infinite volume of matter/energy then they should cease to exist in our universe, gravitationally or otherwise, at the instant they form.Prediction:Mathematical calculations/computer modelling should show that an extremely massive physical black body that achieves rotational hyper-velocity of the surface area in excess of c, under specific minimum conditions of volume, mass, and surface area, should achieve sufficient centrifugal force to temporarily overcome it's own gravitational attraction, and should shed a portion of it's mass before conservation of angular momentum reduces spin below the threshold.Ancillary Prediction:Computer modelling of the release of matter/energy at hyper-velocity rotation should correspond with the initial inflation of the Hubble volume.Hypothesis D:Black holes accrete matter and merge until all the m/e of the Hubble volume is contained in a single black hole.Background: It is not an unreasonable assumption that all mass released from the Big Bang has remained in gravitational communication regardless as to how tenuous. Furthermore, in light of the evidence of black hole mobility, we can assume they will always be free to seek the next strongest gravitational mass, subject only to inertial angular momentum. While inertial momentum will temporarily defeat the much weaker gravitational attraction, the gravitational bond will never be actually broken.As black holes continue to merge, slowly consolidating the mass of the Hubble volume, there will be fewer and fewer sources of gravity to 'confuse' them. As the merged black holes gravitational attractions increase, and there are fewer and fewer nebulous sources of gravity (gas and dust clouds, galaxies), they will, over trillions, perhaps even quadrillions of years, alter their inertial angular momentum away from each other, eventually reverse their courses, and seek each other out.Prediction:Computer simulations should show that the observed mobility of black holes will allow them to merge continually, irrespective of the accelerating recession until 100% of the m/e released from the Big Bang is recovered, and this 100% state of entropy will occur in a small fraction of the time theorized for an isotropic end.Hypothesis E:As with Hypothesis B, all universes beyond the Hubble volume share the same mass and physics. They are distinguishable only by their age and distribution of matter/energy, and are all closed loop universes.Prediction:The most recent and future data from instruments should not indicate any severe red-shift photons originating from outside our Hubble volume. This finding would only be relevant if other experiments and/or observations strongly indicate the existence of space prior to the Big Bang.Hypothesis F:The Big Bang was not a perfectly homogeneous release of matter and energy.Background: Heavier elements formed instantly upon release from the gravitational well would not have the hyper-velocity of lighter elements due to gravitational restraints and therefore the density of m/e should be far greater in close proximity to the Big Bang event. Smaller black holes should have been immediately created from the BB's release of m/e, and thrown into the nearby maelstrom of other denser matter also formed instantly upon release from the BB. This gravitational chaos should have quickly created black holes with masses ranging to the trillions of suns and beyond.Prediction:Extensive examination of the very early universe (within 200 million years) should find black holes with masses well in excess of 50 billion suns contradicting current Standard Model theories of a generally isotropic/homogeneous early universe.It appears unlikely that a different process other than spin could be responsible for a black hole to overcome it's gravitational attraction and release it's mass. Therefore ...Ancillary Prediction:Assuming sufficient instrument sensitivity, the creation of proper algorithms, and adequate computational power ... mined data from all currently available instruments should indicate, if not confirm ...The presence of a remnant 'giga-massive' black hole at the Big Bang.