Abortion is wrong

For starters, stating what your opponent did not do will just help your opponent not help you. It makes you look condescending and tells you opponent where you think they slacked so they can pick it up the next round. As for your scientific evidence, I did not pay much heed to it because it really wasn't scientific evidence at all. They were quotes from scientists stating opinions that matched yours. They did not even say why they matched yours. That isn't much evidence, sorry. The quote about them being the "beginnings" of a new human being actually supports my point by implying that they are not yet human beings. As for the other "scientific evidence", frankly, it was completely irrelevant. I never said that they were not human because they were small, undeveloped, had little environment, or were dependent. I never said that they should be killed because of these things. I don't disagree with them so why waste space responding to something unneeded? Also, you must understand that philosophy favors both sides because it is not formed by facts, but ways of thinking and ideas. My argument about fetuses essentially not being human is also philosophy. "If she would read a little more carefully, she would have seen that: "The killing of innocent, unborn humans is one of those choices that should not be allowed", not the unjustified restricting of rights. So it is the killing that should not be allowed."- I understood what you wrote perfectly thank you. I already have shown more than once that the fact that they are "innocent" is irrelevant. I'm sure Hitler was innocent when born as well. My opponent completely ignores this. I have already shown why a fetus really doesn't have any of the things that make it human. "Though with science it can not be proven if we need to respect innocent human life, science will tell us that the unborn are humans. If the unborn were not human, an abortion would require no more justification than getting a tooth pulled. But since the unborn are human, an abortion requires so much justification that an abortion can never truly be justified. Since my opponent claims to recognize the inherent worth and dignity of every person, I need not go into that realm of the dignity of innocent human life."- Whether something is justified or not is an opinion. Some people like me think abortion is clearly justified. It is just YOUR opinion that it is unjustified and can't be, although some share your opinion. This point is completely irrelevant because like every action, an abortion will be seen as justified by one person and unjustified by another. I have already proved fetuses do not have what makes us human and why the fact that they are innocent is irrelevant. Please refute that before you go on with that point. Last round my opponent wrote: "Next, the readers will notice that my opponent tweaked my clearly worded point. She claims that I said that the unborn are fully developed human beings and then rambles on for a while about that. Never once did I say that the unborn are fully developed human beings and, in fact, further evidence is found in that I give a paragraph explanation as to why development does not matter. I encourage my opponent to read my stuff a little more closely." The round before he wrote: "Science will tell us that the unborn are whole, distinct, and living human beings." Clearly my opponent needs to read back what he wrote before insulting me. All the things my opponent list only prove the fetus physically has the capability to be human. So what? That isn't what makes one human. If the thing being killed has no emotion, no one that cares about it, no life, then what about it makes it human? Its body? It may as well be a corpse if it does not possess those things. The mother has those things, she gets priority. "A pregnancy may be as inconvenient as hell, but it does not justify the killing of an innocent human being."- Inconvenient is still an understatement. It can ruin someone life and in the end kill the mother! Who are we going to favor, a bunch of cells they could turn into a human who will take up more space, resources, and continue overpopulation, force others to care about it, has no emotion or anyone who cares about it, or a mother who has a life, people who care about her, and a future that could be ruined? I ask my opponent to pay less attention to his irrelevant arguments and instead of insulting me, try to refute mine. of course I cannot have scientific evidence that fetuses are not human. if this is what my opponent wanted, then he has expected of me and impossible task. Genetically fetuses are human. But, are your genetics and physicality what makes you human? I think not. At the time of an abortion I have shown that a fetus does not have what makes humans human.