Facist economics vs Capitalist economics

Even though most capitalist nations do have taxes as my opponent claims, that is because capitalist nations are implementing non-capitalist policies. Those taxes cannot thus be attributed to capitalism and capitalist economics but rather non-capitalist systems. As anyone who studies the philosphical roots and ideological roots of capitalism realizes in its purest form capitalism is anarcho-capitalism. This means security, defense, roads, and etc would have to be run by private corporations. Taxes are not capitalist in nature and are noncapitalist. Thus when my opponent refers to 'pure capitalist nations' he is referring to capitalist nations with socialist/fascist/communist policies of taxes. This should clear up how taxes can exist in capitalist nations while capitalism in its purest form does not advocate taxes whatsoever.Even if capitalist nations do have taxes, they are usually not as efficient in protecting the environment and industries from foreign aggression than if those nations were fascist. Fascist nations have stronger governments so they therefore can do government related duties more efficiently like build roads, protect oversea corporations from attacks, and protect enviornment. Also a point my opponent forgot to mention was that fascism will ban drugs and substances that decrease worker productivity such as opium, tobacco, etc. Banning these industries is essential to maintaining efficiency because the worker's work efficiency should be maximized for greater overall production efficiency. When workers smoke, they don't work and they aren't producing goods which leades to inefficiency. When smoking is banned; workers work more, earn more; more products are made; everything is more efficient except for tobacco industries. But this sacrifice is necessary. Because the Qing dynasty of China, chose to use free marketing to try to stimulate growth, a drug known as Opium was imported. When opium came into China; workers overdosed it, left work, and worked inefficiently. If the Qing China had a fascist market rather than a free market then it would have never allowed this drug to destroy worker efficiency.Another critical point dropped out was the banning of polluting rivers or other instances where certain practices that would hurt efficiency are banned in fascist governments but not banned in capitalist governments. Even though one industry may run cheaper if it pollutes a river, it hurts fishing and other aquatic industries a whole lot more. The polluting of rivers would be overall inefficient. Similarly if a computer software company was making anti-viruses it might try to make everyone more vulnerable to viruses if not make viruses themselves so people will buy from that company. Since people now either have the choice of being vulnerable or buying from that software to counter their new vulnerability they will buy it if they can. Under fascism this practice would instantly be banned as under fascism the nation's efficicnecy comes as a priority before ths individual company's profits. The industry must either stop making computers vulnerable and making viruses themselves or be shutdown altogether.Also another point dropped out was the fact that governments have more access to more people which means government could better find people jobs that better suit them.During the great depression of the 1930s it wasn't capitalist or communist but rather fascist economics that could pull a nation out of that economic crisis. It's obvious why communist uSSr had to launch Holodomor genocide of 7+million Ukrainians during this period. However fascist regimes unlike capitalist regimes began governmengt project like road building which not only provided workers with jobs but increased efficiency of transportation. They also took out bank iterest. Although this makes banking industry less efficient, it makes more money for other industries to invest on which caused a resurgence in industries. Capitalist nations were simply not as effective with the government instituted programs that would improve efficiency.Another point also dropped out is that individual corporations aim only for their own gain and not the nation's gain while fascist government aim for national efficiency over indiviidual corporation profits. I will restate a previous example I mentioned. A company under capitalism wanted to sell fabric, it would be in its best interest to sell buffed up fabric because it appears big. Under fascism a company would have to make that size fabric with more actual fabric material. This means other industries who are unaware of how that company makes fabric will run more efficiently from the better quality fabric when making things like clothes.Now my opponent's main argument seems to be trying to refute my last paragraph. One has the right to sell it at what price he/she wishes to so long as no corrupt deal occurs that affects the price. Capitalism does lead to monopolies because once an industry becomes large enough it can make it's products at a price that would prevent newer industries from arising. Those compnaies my opponent mentioned are ont likely to drop out because if one drops out then he will increase chances others drop out and in effect hurt himself. THat means its profitable to be in that agreement to keep others in that agreement kinda like a safety bond. By bonding to that deal one keeps other bonded to so its in the best interest of x,y, and z to conitinue to be in that agreemnt. If x drops out he might worry that y and z will drop out and x will overall learn less profit due to y and z dropping out. However if x stayed in he could ensure y and z stayed in so he could make profit. Also if any new party joined in flying care industry then it's quite likely it would be invited into the deal so it can also derive the benefit of higher profit per item. Greed cannot overcome this problem.