God exists.

sentience No i'm saying that sentience can't come from nothing because sentience is compliex, something complicated must come from soething else thats also complicated. psycology proves that sentience is the brain "First of all, sentience is really about the nerve functioning in the body." - Compelling Interest, roger resler "Current research in cell biology is is suggesting that sentience is a function of living structured water in and around the cells of our body" - Biodynamic Craniosacral Therapy: Volume Two, Volume 2 by Michael Shea so sentience is really just the brain, which is complex, so sentience is complicated. so sentience comes from something already complex... premise 1 is true. it has to have a cause how can you say that god isn't sentient if god talks to moses and noah, israelites, jesus, peter, etc and everyone in the bible, obviously you have to be ale to think if you want to talk... you cant say god isn't sentient of course god is sentient. Seriously, its not even that hard to uderstand what im saying kalam but youre just saying "beginning to exist" so you can say god doesn't need a cause otherwise it would be "EVERYTHING that exists" because i can't even think of anything that doesnt have a cause besides the universe, and the universe is different from everything int he world, thats the fallacy of composition because the universe is a whole. so you're just syaing beging to exist, because you say god doesnt have a begining and so it excludes god. Otherwise it would just be everything like with the universe Ocams razor is a law of logic. "Reconstructionists with a basic notion of logic and reasoning might invoke Occam's razor" -- crime reconstruction by William chesum page 92 "There is a principle of logic, widely accepted in science, called the principle of Occam's razor" -- What's so great about christianity by dinesh souza page 135 "In logic, Occam's razor is the statement of an argument in its essential and simplest terms" -- world book dictionary vol 1 page 1436 This should be obvious to anyone else reading the debate that ocams razor is a rule of logic, it means that we should choose something not complicated (simple) over something that is, the kalam breaks this by saying God doesn't need a cause, well if everything needs a cause (begining to exist is just cherry pick) then so does god bible God was created by jews and christians, this is a fact of history if you are arguing about god, you are arguing about the god of jews and christians. "The ancient Israelites had the concept of one God, a universal and eternal deity." -- voices in exile by marc angel "It is simply that they have had the benefit of history and philosophies unknown to the ancients who formed the concept of one God" -alternatives by marvin leon page 92 "For they found themselves absolutely awash in a world of polytheistic beliefs and people who hated their concept of One God" -- speaking of angels by david albans page 120 "I'm equally sure that the concept of one God does not begin with the prophet Mahomet since the Jews were the first to encounter this One God through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." - This jesus by Jonah Awodeyi This should be obvious too, if you want to talk about god you're always talking about the one god that the JEWS and Christians have worshiped sources king debater doesn't even know what the sentience argument is, or why i say premise 1 is true, then he cherry picks and argues in a circle for kalam, and then he says that the jews did't cerate god, all of which ihave proven to be false, dead wrong.