Convicted criminals should all be chipped

People convicted of a crime by a judge and or their peers in society that are found guilty, are therefore guilty. We can argue that they are innocent. Actually if you visit a prison everyone in there will tell you they are innocent. The recidivism rate speaks for itself, if you look at the numbers of 75% of convicts that re offend, it's safe to say that majority will re offend. As relating to insurance companies, insurance is based on percentages, if you live at an intersection that has a lot of accidents your insurance is higher then other areas, It doesn't matter that you could be a 5 star driver never in an accident, your rate will still be higher because you fall into the statistics based on that address, intersection. It's the same with the type of vehicle you drive. Insurance companies look at percentages of those cars stolen, if you own that car and even if you have an alarm and keep it in a garage your rate will be higher. It's all percentages. Like inmates who re offend, percentages tell us they are more likely to re offend, therefore chip them all!!. Convicted felons receive a criminal record when they are released from jail, this becomes relevant when applying for a job or traveling to other countries. The chip would just add another layer of awareness to the public about the criminal and help law enforcement apprehend them again. Here is some evidence from one of the first ever criminologists Lombroso stating that criminals are born criminals. http://www.historyextra.com... Criminals have a choice before they commit the crime, the laws are all there, written, if you decide to commit a crime, you forfeit all your rights, especially the heinous crimes like murder and rape, any victim will agree with me. That is why they get incarcerated. A person who has been convicted receives a criminal record and they do not deserve any rights, they lost that privilege when they decided to commit a crime. Also under the Patriot Act, the NSA already spies on everyone anyways, so you are not losing any rights, everyone is being watched anyways, the chipping would just another layer of protection and awareness to the public. It is no different then the sex registry for sex offenders. Sex offenders need to notify the police if they are leaving a state. I have shown the cost benefits for law enforcement in apprehension of dangerous repeat offenders, as well as a form of security for victims in locating vengeful criminals who might go after the victim once released from jail. Also criminality breeds more criminals, cartels, drug gangs, these could all be traced through the movement of the chip in the former criminals arm. Criminals associate with other criminals, this would be a way of tracking those illegal operations by the ATF, DEA, FBI and any other government branch. My opponent is trying to argue that for the 25% of criminals that do not re offend we are breaching their civil rights and liberties. I say for the 75% that re offend, this is an excellent proposal. Just like the insurance company who charges you triple for car insurance because you live in the ghetto or a high risk area, it doesn't matter that you could be the 25% of safe drivers, you pay the rate that the 75% pay for that area. The same type logic would apply here. The 25% might not re offend, but they were already convicted once, and as the general public do we want to take that risk. I say no way. And as a final conclusion I would like to include some interesting material for the opponent to realize the severity of what happens to released convicts and why I'm a proponent for chipping them all. No victim of these heinous crimes would ever agree with you and I'm sure I can get a 75% vote on this to win the debate. http://www.dailymail.co.uk... I will be filing this motion with the Department of Justice, and hopefully some day Trump will sign this into law, so if you are a convicted criminal, get your arm out because you will be chipped like a dog!!