Both Atheists and religious-believers are wrong.

You make a good argument, and I agree with some points, but I would argue that they are neither right nor wrong, your ideas and mine included. First a bit of background. I myself consider myself Atheist, Agnostic, and Jewish. I will explain that for you. I am Jewish in title only, in other words, I call myself Jewish, but that is the only think that keeps me in. Conservative Judaism isn't lie fundamentalist Christianity. As long as you call yourself Jewish, you're in. I definitely don't believe in God, but I'm not sure whether there is "something." Let's get back to the argument. The way I'll formulate it is to provide some points for and against each one and then make a closing statement. Atheists believe that there is nothing. It makes sense, because the idea of some all-powerful guy controlling how everything works is kind of ludicrous. If it is true, how come there are so many discrepancies? Nothing can just say, "let there be light," and then there's light. That's crazy. However, on the other side, just look at our cell structure, mitosis, DNA, etc. It can't be a coincidence. I'm not going to specify any religion, so I'll just use the blanket category of "believer." Believers believe in a God. God has to exist. Look at how perfectly everything works, in the scheme of things. Look at DNA. Every one of your characteristics are based on the nitrogen compounds of Adenine, Guanine, Thymine, and Cytosine. How can that be? God. Look at Mitosis. It never messes up. The cell grows, with all of its Organelles. Then the DNA splits perfectly. Helicase breaks it open every time. DNA polymerase almost always brings the right nucleotide. How can it be that perfect? God. However, there are so many contradicting thoughts that all they are are opinions. Opinions of what God is. Now, if something exists, than there should never be opinions on what something is. It's basic logic. You can see something you've never seen before, and think it is something, and your friend can think something completely different. However, that is a hypothesis, not an opinion. Also, If God exists, how come bad things still happen. Some things, like natural disasters, (A.K.A. Acts of God) are understandable. However, If God has the power to take away life, why didn't he kill Hitler and Himmler and Mengele and Eichmann before the Holocaust got so bad? Why isn't Omar Al Bashir dead? Many people would have benefited from the deaths of Agustin Bizimungu and George Ruteganda. Why didn't God strike them down? Quite simple: he is not real. Now, let's discuss your thoughts. It is an interesting idea. It makes more sense than many other beliefs. It uses practicality and nature to formulate, and is plausible. I still have to find ways to disprove it, though. Luckily, I have a few. The only way to have knowledge is to have either a brain or a computer, which must be made of matter. Your God is made of energy. There are only a few kinds of energy, and although they are used in thought, it wouldn't work without the brain, which is made of matter. I am also not a big believer in infinity. My last issue with your belief is that, if God has infinite knowledge, then he knows everything, including what would happen in his "ant farms." He wouldn't have curiosity because he'd already know. Every belief is true. Every belief is also false. That may seem contradictory, and that's mostly because it is. However, it's one of the few occasions where contradiction is okay. The real answer is that we don't know, so for now, everything is right and everything is wrong. You had some good ideas. It's an interesting belief system, and it makes sense, except for a few problems.