abortion must be free in every country

{{{these symbols are used to quote either my opponent or citation from another source}}}as my opponent says:{{{the right to life is the most important of them all, for all other rights, including our other unalienable rights transcend from this. }}}you have a right to leave, baby has a right to live on BUT the woman has also right not to destroy her life so that the baby can live on(as I stated on the first round).{{{As Americans, we have established that the right to life is an unalienable right and is to never be taken away, unless the rights of the individual is taken away due to actions they have committed against the society. Since an unborn baby has committed no evil against said society, it still retains the right to life.}}} if your laws are wrong then it is time to change your law.maybe the has done nothing against society but still woman has right not to carry baby inside the body of herself.and abortion does not mean "kill the baby inside me", if you want and can let the baby live, the woman will not say my baby has to die, she just does not want to carry her.{{{To abort a baby is to not only disregard all human dignity of this full-fledged member of humanity, but is also to go against the very foundation of human dignity and unalienable rights that not only society has established, but humans as a whole have morally established.}}} you may have a moral rules/laws and maybe abortion is out of moral but you can not require or force somebody to live according to the rules set by society, if it contradicts the liberty of person, you have no choice. this part is also answer to the rest of your arguement. but still, for the rest of your arguement, I want to answer with this example:imagine a pregnant woman, when she has an abortion she does not kill the baby, she provides baby with the needs he/she needs to survive, and when she has an abortion she stops providing and stopping providing is her right.she is providing baby, and at any time, she may stop providing, it is her right. abortion means providing baby, if I provide somebody with the needs of him, I can stop providing at any time, can not I? is not it my right? it is like this. let me give you example. imagine I am a rich man, we live in the same street. you have an illness, and just I have a financial status which can pay your hospital bills and your medicines. you need a treatment for 3 months, you came to me and say: Artur, you are a rich man, I have an illness, I need treatment, please provide me with the money needs for medicines. and I ask you: how much do you need. you answer: 560 000 dollars for this month, I gave you this moneym and then you had a chance to survive and now you are alive, but second month comes and you still need money, you come to me and ask:-Artur, you are a rich man, without your help I have no chance to survive, please give me 560 000 which supplies all the money I need for the treatment of this month, if you dont provide me with the money I need, then I can not survive.at the moment, do I have a right not to give you money? or is it rule for me to give you my money so that you can survive?baby abortion is like that, woman provides him with the things that the baby needs in order to survive, and now that woman wants to stop providing!she does not say that kill my baby, if you can make the baby living in a diffrent way, but she can not be required to provide for others life, how come can you think that she has to destroy her own life for that baby? how come can you think that I am required to give 560 000 dollars for your life? it is my right not to help you, as it is my right not to help you, it is also her right not to help to baby.I provide you with money so that you can survive and woman provides baby with the things that the baby needs in order to survive, can you have a right to force me to give you money? is it justice? abortion is also like this, you can not force woman to carry baby, to provide baby so that the baby can survive.