Navi shouldn't have awaken Link up.

I have waited two days as my opponent requested. REBUTTALSContention 1: The Master Sword was needed to stop Ganondorf My opponent has made a fatal error in his last argument, that is actually false in conjunction to the game. My opponent dis-regarded the link I posted earlier which evidenced that the master sword is the only weapon to have stopped Gird in his statement of: You didn't really NEED the Master Sword to kill Gerudo. For reference, I'll again post the definition that I posted right at the beginning of my argument in R2 that contradicts this."Master Sword- is a recurring sword in the Legend of Zelda series. It is imbued with the power to vanquish evil. In many games, it is said to be the only sword capable of defeating the malevolent Ganondorf and his demonic alternate form, Ganon. "http://zelda.wikia.com... So here is the first flaw with my opponents rebuttal. But wait! There is a second one as well!FrackJack- "There is no reason to think Gerudo couldn't be killed by anything besides the Master Sword. Case-in-point, the Biggoron Sword."Again this statement is FALSE. The Biggoron sword can be used at best as help in the fight against Gerudo, but it is incapable of winning the fight against him."The Biggoron's Sword is incapable of defeating Ganon's beast form as only the Master Sword can deliver the final blow. "Also the Biggoron sword is a two handed weapon. Before Gerudo changes to Ganon, he uses a reflexive blast that can only be deflected via a shield, meaning Link would need the master sword anyway, or he would have died. Finally, in the fight against Gannon (Gerudo's beast form) it's impossible to put the finishing blow on him without the master sword, as quoted above. While the sword can be used to help in the fight once the master sword is knocked away, it can never actually kill him as my opponent suggested. There are three loop holes in my opponents arguments.Please watch the video above for context to the fight between Link and Gannon (specifically 6:40-7:10 where it shows Link needing the master sword for the final blow).http://www.youtube.com...http://zeldawiki.org...'s_SwordContention 2: Ganondorf could have achieved the stone himself. Ganondorf already had plans to get all three of the stones that were a work in progress.1. The Deku tree was dying from the curse placed on him. Upon Deku's death, access to Kokiri's Emerald would have been far too easy for him."The Kokiri's Emerald is held by the Great Deku Tree and the Kokiri in the Kokiri Forest. WhenGanondorf came to steal the Emerald, the tree refused to hand it over. In return, Ganondorf curses the tree with Queen Gohma and her evil underlings."2. Ganondorf cut of the Goron's food supply, and put their lair under threat of death with his curse. Eventually Darunia would have had to sacrifice the stones, or risk him, and his race dying off over Goron's Ruby."While reluctant to aid Link, Darunia tells him that in return for not giving him the Spiritual Stone, Ganondorf summoned a mighty boulder to block access to the Dodongo's Cavern, the Gorons' primary food source. Additionally, he caused the Dodongos residing within to grow rapidly, filling it with the evil creatures."3. And finally Ganondorf had plans laid out for Zora's stone as well. Ganondorf has trapped Zora in Lord Jabu-Jabu until she bargained the stone, and in this scenario, it is VERY likely to believe that she might have given it to him had Link not saved her. "The letter states that she is stuck inside Lord Jabu-Jabu, the guardian god of the Zora. Apparently, Ganondorf had also come to Zora's Domain in search of the Sapphire, but King Zora XVI refused to give it to him. Ganondorf, in turn, cursed Lord Jabu-Jabu with an army of Bari led by the monster Barinade."http://zelda.wikia.com...The point is, Ganondorf had every plan lined up in order to achieve the stones, as was in the process of achieving them himself. Remember, Ganondorf is called "the king of thieves". ;-)Next my opponent states that the mastersword could not have been acquired by Ganondorf had it not been for Link. Again this is false because "A noble person pulling it from a pedestal" is only one of the four methods of acquiring the master sword. 3 out of the 4, involved in getting the sword, consist of using another sword, to forge, or find it."Three of the four methods of acquiring it entail it being made from an existing sword, which does not share the Master Sword's traditional origins."http://zelda.wikia.com...However, even without this argument, the statement of "Navi shouldn't have woken Link up," is invalid. Ganondorf was running around the country side cursing everyone, threatening entire race's from existence, and capturing Gods. The dude was an absolute evil nut case and needed to be stopped. Even if the Deku tree knew that Ganondorf couldn't achieve access to the Tri-force and Hyrule, he still would have needed to call upon link. Remember, the entire purpose of him calling Link was for help against his curse; most of the big story plot came into play after Link discovered the bulk of what Ganondorf was up to. So even without access to Hyrule, Ganondorf was a threat to everyone and everything, and Link being the only one to be able to access the Mastersword, would have needed to pull it from the pedestal anyway in order to kill him. It is either that, or let the nut case run free reigning terror upon the land at his own will. Link was the only person who could kill him period, meaning it was overall beneficial for Navi to have woken him up.But really, all Link grabbing the Master Sword did was give Ganondorf access to Hyrule. Their was a loophole with Him using the Tri-force to being with because his heart had too much power drive, rather than wisdom, or courage. This is how he ended up getting his plans messed up in the first place: Link was stuck in time, though he had the the third piece embedded within him. So with it being said that Link was the ONLY one who could defeat Ganondorf, the evil thief king, is it so bad that Ganondorf got a hold of Hyrule to really do the same thing he could have done almost anywhere else in the world? The Tri-force did nothing for him, so only Link getting the master sword, in the end only benefited Hyrule. "He already had it due to the events of Ocarina of Time, hence Link and Zelda already having their respective pieces from their ancestors, the Link and Zelda of Ocarina of Time. Link tipped the King of Hyrule and Zelda off about Ganondorf treachery before it could happen at the end of Ocarina of Time, and he was subdued before the siege of Hyrule Castle could take place. However, the Triforce still remained scattered from the events of Ocarina of Time."http://zeldawiki.org...Contention 3: Without Link Ganondorf would likely have not been defeated. While my opponent quotes this argument, he doesn't actually respond to it. Instead he just repeats arguments he made against my contention 2. With that said I am going to consider this contention DROPPED. "Frack: First of all, TUF concedes that Gerudo needed Link for the Master Sword."Yes. So? This argument works in my favor, because without the master sword Ganondorf could not have been defeated. (side note, we should stop calling him Gerudo as opposed to Ganondorf HIS REAL name, as Gerudo is just his race. That's like calling a black person "Blackie" instead of their real name.)Also how did Link make things FUBAR? lol By defeating the evil King? The king dying, is what destroyed the castle IE had nothing to do with link, other than the fact that link killed him. So are you saying a burnt down tower wasn't good enough reason to destroy him?Anyways' this is all besides the point. The point is: Who else could have killed him? And if there is someone, why didn't they do it in the seven years?Fin.