Off-Topic cannot logically apply to a multi-faceted Universe that contains multi-faceted creatures.

I will be using letters to distinguish what I am responding to in chronological order from first response (all paragraphs in each response will be paraphrased) to last: A. Do not seek answers - ask questions. You can ask questions, while still opposing my position as I ask my own questions. You questioned me with answer-ability, not analysis. You must provide your own question without wanting me to provide you an answer, as philosophy is designed to shake the foundation of Man's current systems. I cannot answer what has yet to be discovered, which lies solely in question as I feel that what I am questioning will be discovered by me very soon with all the analysis I've made so far. Your questions will pose against my question - in that, I will come to my own answers; you will come to your own answers. These answers can never go any further than what we have gathered thus far. This philosophical discussion is designed to think outside of the box, with intentions to hit a mark. B. It is dark matter, as the human mind is born and lived through the same process as the Universe. The neurons in our brain are "human stars". Instead of being close-minded towards my expanded version of dark matter, question it. My school of thought has lead me to many grand conclusions such as: 1) the male genitalia on a cosmic level is the star which explodes; the female genitalia is the black hole which creates. 2) the asteroid belt on a human level is the kidney stones we suffer from when we slack on iron, while also having calcium build up. 3) water can be posited as being the consciousness, hence the chemical which allows us to dream at night those worlds beyond our reality, contains 99% water; water reflects, like consciousness; consciousness is easily disturbed like water; both flow; both contain a surface and a below-surface. 4) the human eye contains patterns of a nebula. 5) the human body is influenced by the turtle's, the clam's, the jelly fish's and many other sea creatures on top of subatomic matter. 6) electrons behave like bees; humans wash their hands like flies. 7) when humans are in a group, and then something causes them to break apart, you'll see that they break away exactly like gas molecules. 8) did I mention that the black hole is legitimately the female's genitalia and the star that explodes is legitimately the male's genitalia? I figure this out. Nobody has thought about this - this, alone, will prove to everyone how far I've gone into breaking down this entire Universe by understanding the secrets of learning the mirror-like bond between Us and the Universe. C. Nikola Tesla, a genius beyond any man, as according to Albert Einstein, warned today's science that it is thinking deeper, rather than clearer. This is to say that the base formula is enough to understand a result - however, scientists are taking this base formula and multiplying it endlessly, which eventually loses face of reality. The man said it himself, I have been following this principle far before I came across this man, myself. Science is not pragmatic - philosophy is pragmatic. Philosophy is the father of Science - without questioning, there wouldn't be experimenting. This is to say that I am well aware of what works and what does not in this Universe we all share, but live individually at the same time. This is to say that by saying I know more than you, is not to belittle you - it's the result of me knowing more than you do, as I have sacrificed everything to achieve this level of analysis. D. There's a reason why the brain makes these connections, friend. So let me help you establish the difference between connection and commitment: when someone connects with something, they do not take it personal, even though the experience of an enlightenment may cause them to be emotional - when someone commits to something, they take it person, even though evidence may cause them to deny the essential. All wise man are like water - they can take up any form. Those that connect, are becoming - those that commit, are regressing. If you want to see what I see between a woman's vagina and a black hole, simply Google the image "Black Eye Hole", there should be a picture near the top that will give you just the right angle to understand exactly what I mean. Otherwise, you will not have the power of analysis I have, as I could see this correlation by simply observing the contrasts of the Universe - this is to say that I cosmically reverse-engineered my analysis to come to that conclusion. E. Keep in mind that you're not asking enough questions - you're asking for the sake of your own confusion. This is poison for the brain - always open yourself up and accept the possibility that what you're doing is not constructive and is in fact destructive. We are all architects - this world is our archive. It's silly to say that omni-reverance may not be good, when the wise have always spoke the words of the Universe at its most refined state. Nothing can go wrong when you admire everything and accept everything whether it be negative or positive. I do not mind your skepticism - I do mind your lack of question. - I know that causation does not always equal correlation, but this statement is used more often than not to excuse those that know what they are talking about because what they say is beyond anything the receiver ever experienced, let alone had to think about. The Universe wears many masks - everything that is "human" can be explained, defined and demonstrated by cross-referencing everything of it to the design of the Universe. - If you do not understand how to take this Universe as cosmic poem, you will never grow to understand the cosmic tapestry I have lying in my hands because it does not share your literal views - such views that are created by those that have fallen to the illusion of reality, what with labels, systems and objects made by naive and foolish Man.