The CWO "vote bombed" no one.

[Definitions] C. W. O. - a group known as the "conservative world order" started by the_conservative when he posted the following message sent to members of conservative ideologies on this site. The title of this message was called "This is WAR! !! " Vote Bombing - a generalized definition meaning to vote based on a group decision, or simply based on who you agree with before reading the debate. Example: Bob had a debate against Jake. Bob noticed he was losing in large numbers. Bob sent a message to group B with similar ideologies as himself complaining about the debate. Group B voted en masse to the point where Bob was now beating Jake. Thus Group B engaged in "vote-bombing" [Resolution] I affirm that the group CWO (see definitions) engaged in vote-bombing (see above) [Factual-Evidence] Below is a message sent by my opponent regarding one of his debate. This is a CWO message. This was the basis for the CWO "Alright everyone, as you all may know, I got into a heated debate on John McCain picking Sarah Palin was a bad choice, and we all know I got a crushing victory. So today when I logged in I saw that my ranking had dropped about 10 percent. I was "what the"? it said I had won only 2 debates and that I lost 7! !! Yesterday I had won 5 debates and lost 4. So now I realize that ANSmith and JTSmith and their liberal friends all voted every single point for my opponent in all my debates! !! Please vote for me on all my debates to help get them back to the way they were. Thank you John This is War" A corresponding message sent by the second leader of this group, CiRro "No problem. I will do my best to get all your debates up. I can guarantee 21 points" Following this message was a few messages by the level-headed conservatives who dissented against this message. A corresponding message sent by CiRro: "Link error happened for me too. Anyway, this site is strongly left. Obviously that has to "change" (In the words of B. Hussein Obama). Furthermore, we need to choose a conservative leader, or a conservative council. If we start a conservative group as soon as the group option becomes available, and we have a strong leader, we can easily undermine liberal influence and ideas being spread on this site. " A corresponding message by my opponent: "I would agree with a council of possibly 3? We could easily start a free webs page and lock it to non-members and have a forum in it, I would design if needed. " A corresponding message by another member: "Together we stand separated we fall. I suggest we do this ONLY when the odds are very stacked against us. Liberals feed on lies and tricks, a little taste of there own medicine may be the cure they need. " A corresponding message by my opponent: "I agree with josh" A corresponding message by another member: "We need to talk more and seek out these unfair votes and fight fire with fire. " A message from another member: The lead in my debate Trinity against ANSmith is good enough, thank you for looking at the site but the lead is enough. Thank you very much and let me know if any of you would like me to look at any of your debates. [Observations] 1. the_conservative was slightly losing the following debate. . http://www.debate.org... 2. Following the messages posted above the_conservative is winning 105 to 39 points. 3. The voting demographics show that way more members with "conservative" viewpoints voted in this debate. 4. The voting demographics show that way more members with "republican" viewpoints voted in this debate. 5. In fact there were 14% more conservatives that voted in this debate than there were than all other political stances combined [Supporting Arguments] 1. As is shown above the_conservative (the first leader of the CWO to be appointed) requests that members vote for him. He requests not that they look at the debate and vote for whom they choose. He explicitly requests that they vote for him. Then CiRro (second leader of the CWO), says that he can "guarantee 21 points" 2. This idea of vote bombing is upheld by all three supposed leaders of this group. Additionally members agree. Below if factual testimony. Members state "own medicine [supposed vote bombing] may be the cure they [members with liberal ideology] need" My opponent (third and final leader of CWO) states in response to this message: "I agree with josh" "seek out these unfair votes and fight fire with fire [vote bombing]" 3. For the group to have considered to have "vote-bombed" only one member of this group (especially those in charge of it) had to have voted in the notion suggested above. As is shown this was the intention of several members.