Theism is more rational than Atheism.

*most of this is quoting, its not actually that long* The Bible is a self contradicting, factually flawed book written most defiantly by history 'trolls' who wish to influence people. I wish to ask you this: Your arguments obviously show you are a firm believer of the Pascal's Wager and you even admit the possibility of what I have stated above - If you don't truly believe in god, and only 'believe' it because of the divine reward; what makes you think that god would appreciate such type of a believer? In response to: "True, There IS a possibility that a certain God who punishes Theists and Rewards Atheists exists, but then again- The Bible is an object that slightly raises the chance of the Christian/Catholic/etc. God. I know it might seem like i'm making the fallacy Ad Populus, but what I mean is this- There's an equally possible chance that the Christian/Catholic/etc." HA! Admitting you have made the Ad Populus fallacy? I would dismiss your argument, but that would mean that this round was useless, so I might as well do it for the fun of it. Now for: "There's an equally possible chance that the Christian/Catholic/etc. God exists and that a God that will punish Theists exist. But, the Bible says otherwise- And the bible is the "Tie breaker" here, because it's more likely that ancient humans documented the existence of a God than the possibility of a God that punishes Theists (That you just came up with now) exists. See, there's a 50-50 chance that the writers of the Bible made it to be taken seriously, and there's another 50-50 chance that they're just a bunch of history trolls. Now, that 50% adds to the chances that God is real, so it's 1/W34; + A small chance that God exists provided by the likeliness of the Bible. I know you might think, "Well I could just write stuff down and it would raise the chances of that thing existing", but it doesn't- Because you KNOW it's fake- We're not wondering whether or not you made that seriously, because we know you did it. The Bible, on the other hand, has a chance of being fake and a chance of being true, and the chance of being true adds to the chance of the existence of God, is cancelled out by the chance of it being fake, and then the most likely chance that ancient humans simply documented Holy Activity adds to the existence of God. So technically, by an extremely small amount, God is more likely than.. Say, "QOP", The god that Punishes Theists and rewards Atheists." Not so. It would seen that after 2 rounds of destroying your arguments with the Infinite Possibility Argument, it appears you still don't understand, so I will try to use another argument: (Which I must admit is not too hard) "there's a 50-50 chance that the writers of the Bible made it to be taken seriously, and there's another 50-50 chance that they're just a bunch of history trolls. Now, that 50% adds to the chances that God is real, so it's 1/W34; + A small chance that God exists provided by the likeliness of the Bible." In other words, you are saying because we don't know if the writer actually meant for it to be true or not, it is 50% likely to be true. You CAN actually use this, in a way: "I know you might think, "Well I could just write stuff down and it would raise the chances of that thing existing", but it doesn't- Because you KNOW it's fake- We're not wondering whether or not you made that seriously, because we know you did it. " If a third party were to write that a theist hating god exist because they've seen one, we would have no way to find out if its true. Using your logic, there is ALSO a 50% chance. Same goes to any other holy book or even articles labeled as 'pseudoscience'. Due to the burden of proof, we cannot 'prove' certain things exist (I would name one, but no FSM, right) and therefore, if it was written and we don't know the truth of the mindset of the author/writer, it would be 50% possibility of truth. As you should realized now, this is extremely fallacious. (Please just stop with the Pascal's Wager. I believe I have already effectively destroyed that argument and there is no point in trying to rebuild it from the dust) I await your response