The republican house has not voted in favor of more than 2 bills that are benifiical to the USA

1)So far I am the only one who has posted research showing that the budget control act would destroy jobs. You saying it won't destroy jobs does not make it so. Also the reasons you stated that it would not destroy jobs were thoroughly debunked by the fact that the things you said would occur have not occurred in the past and have not occurred despite people saying they will for years and years. 2)The Cut cap and balance would make it harder to reduce the impact of recessions meaning it would cause future recession to be deeper with more job loses. C) And the reason all those problems are occurring in the Eurozone is because they are restricted. The cut cap and balance bill would restrict the US moving us closer to haveing the problems that are occurring in the Eurozone. D) Incorrect the fact still remains that the cut cap and balance act that forces the government to only spend at a certain level would result in massive cuts to SS and Medicare, or would result in no more environmental protections, food safety, Pell grants, roads, or infrastructure spending. This is because capping spending at a certain GDP makes it impossible to finance all current programs because SS and Medicare spending set to increase due to increases in senior citizens. E) My source links to a report by Zandi who is a conservative economist who did the math and he concluded that it would kill 700,000 jobs. Your sources are just random people saying the same thing you're saying. http://ourfuture.org... F) See above (section e) 3)A) There is no example of a single government dollar currently going to abortion. Meaning banning federal dollars going to abortion doesn't change a single thing. The executive order wasn't Obama deciding to extend the law it was him recognizing the Hyde amendment and other laws banning federal money from going to abortions. B) So basically you think banning government abortion is good because makes it so only half of America gets what it wants while the other half doesn't. 4)Here is what you wrote, "Ill drop this one" The reason you dropped it was because you were using a bill that had not passed the house. 5)The Autism bill continued current funding; that is keeping the status quo . Even the bills language says it. http://www.gpo.gov... 6)According to the summary of the Child family services act there isn't any significant changes The modifications are just semantic changes. Such as referring to drugs as abusive chemicals. http://www.gpo.gov... 7)Yep you double posted it. 8)HR2715 extends the authority to mandate that child products do not have lead; however it creates a loophole that allows some products to contain lead -Budget control act isn't good because it increases unemployment. -Cut cap and balance isn't good because it restricts Americas ability to fight recessions and it also results in the government either slashing SS and Medicare spending or eliminating environmental laws, food safety, infrastructure spending etc. -No taxpayer funding for abortion act doesn't change a thing given that no federal money goes to abortions currently. -Combating autism act just maintains current measures already implemented meaning it doesn't count. -Child and family services act just maintains the states quo again. -HR 2715 allows some child's products to have lead in them; I repeat poisoning kids is not a good idea. Being at the end of this post me and my opponent will have the same amount of posts with arguments the debate ends here. Also I believe that I should win the conduct point given that I did not curse and insult my opponent and my opponent did just that to me.