God most likely exists

Ok, although it is not in order, I am going to address your last statement first. I shouldn't have to prove to you that god isn't real. You're supposed to give me evidence that he is real. There is no evidence that anything relating to your precious Jehovah actually happened. You know what? Jesus was thought to be real for a long time, his powers just exaggerated, but guess what? There is actually no evidence that he is real (http://y-jesus.com...). Face it, you rely on finding small holes in theories that are most likely correct instead of coming up with legitimate arguments. Ok, regarding your first (real) point. how can a being simply have "always been there". What evidence do you have to back that up? None? Probably. Do you know why? Because you're making things up to sound smart. Well, I guess I should expect that from a religious conformist. You only follow your religion because you were either raised on it, or other people convinced you to join. But that's off topic. On you saying that I haven't demonstrated that evolution isn't a silly theory, I literally put a link in my argument showing that scientists had observed evolving genomes. If that isn't concrete evidence, I don't know what is. Yet again though, you lack any actual evidence. I have asked you time and time again for real evidence, and yet you keep failing to come through, you just tell me to prove that god isn't real. I've said it before and I'll say it again, that's not the way it should be. If something has no evidence, I shouldn't have to disprove it, you should have to show me real evidence. In all honesty, you sound like a seven year old saying "prove it" in a mocking tone. Yes, you do indeed sound like a child. Responding to your statement claiming that "...nothing caused God to exist. He has always been there.", explain to me how that works? How has he always been there? How can something not have a beginning? This argument is preposterous. When I said that the writers of the Bible were not qualified, I was totally correct. I'm using common knowledge to infer that those people were probably highly religiously biased. And anyway, in your last argument you stated that farmers, shepherds, judges, etc. wrote the Bible, and now you're claiming that god wrote the Bible? Please explain this nonsense. I never said that god caused these conditions, in fact, I said that we need to stop relying on god and blaming god for our mistakes. In reality, I actually asked why god would let these innocent people suffer when he has the power to stop it. In response to your apparent belief that god's going to send his son down to fix everything, that is exactly the point I'm trying to convey about your belief. You all rely on an unknown entity to fix the earth, so you ignore real world problems. Why wouldn't god send down his son down right now? We all know we could use it. So, your Jehovah's Witness video asks "how can a loving god be responsible for this?" simple. He doesn't exist. You claim that an evil being controls the world? Really? You're blaming something that's caused by huge corporations, corrupt government, and real people, on something that probably doesn't even exist? Your source for the Bible quote I brought up is extremely unreliable. It is called "christiananswers.net". It's obviously going to have a strong bias. Who even knows what the original scripture says? It's been passed down through so many millennia. And about Mary being impregnated; you can't use an argument about god doing something as if it's indeed fact in a debate about whether god exists or not. I said it before and you obviously completely disregarded it. And no, "god did it" is not a perfectly valid argument at all. Prove to me that god exists, or at least come up with some real evidence, and then the real world might consider it as a legitimate argument. Your paper about the ark states that it was 40,000 cubic meters. How did a 400 year old man build a 40,000 cubic meter ark out of wood? Even if he did have 120 years? In fact, how did he live to be 400 years old in the first place. Another scientific inaccuracy in the Bible. Big surprise there. And saying that Satan was "talking through the snake" doesn't make it any more probable. The snake would still need human tongue, mouth, and vocal chord to speak. No. Homosexuality is not an imperfection. It has been proved numerous times to be just as normal as heterosexuality. And you're asking these people to suppress the urges that are only natural for a reward that probably doesn't exist. This is what's wrong with the human race. Not Satan. Not an evil man in the sky making bad things happen. People like you. I was using the analogy for your sake, not mine. You did indeed state in your first argument that carbon dating is not accurate, so, like the Bible, you have contradicted yourself. You can't just pick when things are right and when they are wrong when they benefit you. And again, regarding your statement on me not giving evidence that god isn't real, I have given many points of evidence on why my beliefs are real, and you have given none. I await Pro's response. Thank you.