Is it ok to debate God in from a Christian viewpoint (Christian to Christian)

Seeing this is my final round I would like to make this n atmosphere of underbidding and explaining. To learn from the other and not argue. I would not like to debate but to allow us to have counsel with each other and our God. I thank my opponent for his answers to my statement of fact and I thank him for his input. I do want to make a comment about how he said "debating god'. I do take offence to this in a way just because you are not respecting God through this by capitalizing the g but I would like to ask you not to do this but check over all God spelling in further debates. ------------------------------------------ Now... You made a comment that I did not make a "rebuttal" to your argument and I apologize due to the fact that I was running out of room. Now I shall explain how you are wrong in this round but I would like to focus on your point number 2 and 3. Seeing that this is all about what this debate is all about I would like to bring forth what I believe on this and what I believe the Bible says about this case. ---------------------------------------- Point 2: -For your defining of point two I believe you should not debate your fellow Christian. The bible says, "Go ye unto all the world, and preach the Gospel." (Mark 16:15). If a person is so blind that they will not do this and don't have faith that they have a chance to convince others then they are truly not walking in faith with the Spirit and the Lord. Without faith that you can not do something that the Bible declares you must surely not be walking in the faith. Like how sin is the same no matter what sin you commit, no matter what act of faith you disclaim from your Christian life they are all the same. For example if you say the Lord will not come again when I am alive and if you compare that to you not thinking idolatry is a sin then you are wrong. The bible states this and therefore if you do not have faith in any part of the Bible then you do not have faith in God. In conclusion things such as this can not be approached with debate but simply by finding guidance in the Bible. Point 3 -I believe your point three is wrong in but one way. I do not believe that debate is a better lesson than actually teaching one to debate I believe that we should refer to biblical study and biblical study rather than come up with our own ways of teaching and debate the other. Now to your latest statement- -I would like to first start at the very beginning of you debate in round three, I would like to do this because in the beginning you stated your definitions of debate. Because you posted this you must believe this so here is what is wrong with what you did. I believe that your argument is unsatisfactory in this being due to you having all of these be related to voting in some circumstances which is irrelevant and many of them say to argue. The link on which you posted said this, "An argument about a particular subject," and, " in which opposing arguments are put forward". Do these points not say to argue which is not only an action but it is and action brought out of wanting to make yourself better. The act of teaching would be much better because it is giving something to someone else so they might understand clearly and they will want to move forward in their learning of the subject and not simply leave it at that. Beside this I saw that you said, "Jesus argued" I very much disagree. I believe the Pharisees argued and Jesus was teaching them. In my opinion and Dr and Pastor Davis Lr. Bergen Jesus was trying to teach them and not debate them because in every circumstance Jesus was never angered and always in every citation was 100% God and had grace so therefore he would not talk with anger nor would he criticize the other like the Pharisees did. Point being Jesus did just about the exact opposite as the Pharisees. Closing- I must go soon to church and I woke up early to complete this so it will be short. I say that you must not debate with any person especially with non-believers about religion or in nother words our God because 1. It has a bad influence on the other 2. We are not pure of hearth when doing so 3. We should be teachers and not lower ourselves to their standards. I say there are two people in life, debtors and listeners" as Pastor Jim Bennett would say. This meaning the debater's you can only hope to plant seed and then maybe it will grow but the listeners, the listeners are the ones that will and are thirsty for the Word of God. In conclusion we should teach so the people are less ignorant and give them guidance with the Bible Christians and non Christians and furthermore we need to do so with a kind heart like Jesus did the Savior of the World. A great man he was and a great God he is. I would like to thank my opponent for this debate and I would like to thank him for his view on religious debate and my view on it and I would also like to thank him for helping me to understand how to debate better. With best of luck in all things you do -Eric Citations- Dr. and Pastor David Lr. Bergen Pastor Jim Bennett Mark 16:15