If Jesus were born today he would be an atheist (don't vote w/o reading plz!)

This is obviously the type of debate that sends a dagger through the heart of every serious Christian. Still I ask anyone voting to hold back their biases and read the debate thoroughly. The debate will obviously be nothing more than speculation on both sides. Lets clarify the parameters of the debate: "Jesus" refers to Jesus of Nazareth. The man worshiped by the Christian religion. This debate has the potential to get sidetracked into a debate over the nuances of what Jesus actually was. This is not a debate about the constituents of Jesus. That is another debate topic and if someone would like to challenge me, be my guest. Christians themselves can't even agree as to what Jesus actually was and the vast majority of people on the planet are not even Christian. Total non Christians = 4.7 billion Total christians = 2.1 billion Therefore it should not a given that Jesus is anything more than a man. (if my opponent wishes to argue this the burden of proof is his. ) "Atheist" refers to an individual who lacks belief in a god. ***An atheist is NOT necessarily an individual who believes there is no god, as such an act requires active belief.*** Accordingly all non-human animals (and all forms of inanimate matter) are atheists. Resolved: If Jesus were born today he would be an atheist. My argument is simply and straight-forward like all good arguments. 1) Jesus was concerned with truth about reality. (A rare breed both then and today!) 2) In his day Jesus used the best available evidence to make conclusions about reality. 3) The best available evidence then pointed to the existence of God. (see below*) 4) The best available evidence at that time was not sufficient for making accurate conclusions. 5) If Jesus were born today he would have the evidence we have today. 6) The evidence today does not point to the existence of God. 7) Jesus, as someone concerned with truth, would have used the evidence today and therefore would not have concluded that god exists. As long as you do not conclude that god exists you are technically an atheist. (once again remember the difference distinguished above, that active belief is not the only form of atheism.) *In every culture there have been individuals concerned with the truth about reality. These individuals are usually a very small minority as most people just go about their lives w/o ever wondering what reality actually is. People used evidence in ancient times just as much as science does today. In ancient times evidence pointed to there being a god b/c their evidence was very lacking. Visions were a form of evidence used to conclude the existence of the supernatural. All over the world people would eat strange plants, stare at the sun, live in total blackness for months at a time, or just have other mental problems and they would see "visions." Back then they didn't have an appropriate field of study dedicated to the mind and consciousness. Thus they didn't have the evidence we now have. Namely that those "visions" don't actually correspond to anything real. That is why today we call them hallucinations. People today still claim to see visions just like those described in the bible and all other ancient texts (I myself have see countless visions like these). Today, however we call these people insane (or drug users.)