IF ANY ONE were a 100% Fully human, that leaves NO room for e.g. a supernatural archangel!

Con: First, perfect has a number of meanings, the most important of them in this context is simply complete. Humans have been incomplete due to imperfection ever since Adam and Eve sinned. Christ, however, was made complete by the operation of holy spirit on the edge in Mary's womb. This was necessary because under the law, only a perfect sacrifice would do. Pro: Irrelevant and thus not worth responding too here in this Debate! I am however still patiently & waiting eagerly for Con however to legitimately adhere to the Debate Topic, including Cons explanation & bible based evidence (not speculation) of how a supposed literal Pre-existent Divine Supernatural Archangel called Michael, ended up inside Story book Mary's Womb; soon to be named Jesus? (cf. Luke 1:31) KIT Story book version That of course as I stated earlier, would require a Transplant / Transfer in to Mary's Womb! Con: Now to address the actual topic, let me point out that at no time when on this earth was Jesus. Anything other than 100% perfect human. The fact that he had in his head. The full personality and memories of God's son did not alter that fact. Pro: That is not addressing the Topic but is conversely irrelevant speculation concerning what a babe may or may not have known about itself? Con: Therefore there is no need for any further room inside that 100% perfect human body. To address my opponents other point, may not seem as simple as in fact it is. #Con acknowledges Pro is CORRECT!: i.e. Con wrote: My opponent states that at no time does Scripture describe the Christ as anything other than a Jew. In that he is perfectly correct. Pro: I repeatedly remind Con that the Thread Topic is - ' IF ANY ONE were a 100% Fully human, that leaves NO room for e.g. a supernatural archangel! ' Con has not done so! I am of course most pleased that Con has now contradicted himself by previously claiming ' I was clueless and other derogatory remarks to that effect Con has repeatedly made elsewhere, but now concedes Con spoke falsely! Con: What he fails to take into account, is the fact that whilst Judaism was abandoned, because it's unfaithfulness, faithful individuals would never be abandoned. In fact for some time after Jesus death his followers were known as the sect of Judaism. Paul was very careful in both his letter to the Hebrews, and his letter to the Romans, to explain that this group were actually a new Israel, formed from a rootstock of faithful Jews. Though Judaism was, and still is, left to its own devices by God, the new Israel has never been completely abandoned. Eventually this spiritual Israel became known as Christianity. In the first century, that new, spiritual, Israel, called in Scripture the Israel of God, was faithful to God and Christ but the apostasy put an end to that. Despite that, through the ensuing centuries there was still always one or two faithful servants of God, who, though they knew little of the truth fought hard to save what they found, often dying horribly in the process. When the time was right, Jesus acted as he had in the first century, to pull faithful ones out of the Christianity that was by now thoroughly apostate, and reformed spiritual Israel through those ones, who eventually became known as Jehovah's Witnesses. So, are Jehovah's Witnesses strict adherents of biblical Jews? By no means, however, they are the revived Israel of God that was created to replace Judaism. My opponent would do well to remember that the words Jews and Israelites are not interchangeable. The name due referred to an adherent of Judaism, whereas Israelite refers merely to a member of the nation of Israel. Judaism only emerged when the worship of the sons of Israel became irreversibly apostate. Jehovah's Witnesses adhere very carefully to all the principles to which such ones as Noah, Abraham, and Jesus, as well as the Apostles adhered to. That gives them the right to call themselves not only true Christians, but also spiritual Israelites. Whilst they do not adhere strictly to the law, because it was fulfilled in the Christ, and parts of it will read it impossible to adhere to buy the destruction of the Temple, they do adhere to all the principles behind it. Jesus said to his questioner, when asked what was the most important commandment in the law: You must love Jehovah your God with your whole heart, your whole soul, and your whole mind. He then said: The second like it is this, you must love your neighbour as yourself. On these two commands the whole of the law profits hangs. Therefore, any who obey those two commands have fulfilled the whole of the law. The role of Jehovah's Witnesses, in imitation of their king Jesus Christ, is not only to fulfil those two commands, it is to help others do the same, should they wish to. I thank my opponent for the opportunity to correct any misconceptions about who and what Jehovah's Witnesses truly are Pro: Again all that Con has provided apart from congratulating me for my Truth telling (See: #Con acknowledges Pro is CORRECT! above) the remainder of Cons statements are actually irrelevant to the Debate Topic, of which I AGAIN remind Con - ' IF ANY ONE were a 100% Fully human, that leaves NO room for e.g. a supernatural archangel! ' It is impossible for me to actually address ' pertinent points Con has raised in relation to support of Cons arguments ', simply because Con HASN'T provided them, but has rather wandered off in to entire irrelevancies! i.e. e.g. Perfection, Story book Jesus was an eternal Jew & alleged history of so called Christianity to mention a couple! My Satan Con = ADVERSARY, has offered absolutely nothing by way of contradicting that Premiss which remains vindicated! I again invite Con to actually address the Debate Topic shown again below, with relevancy, not the contrary we have observed thus far from Con - ' IF ANY ONE were a 100% Fully human, that leaves NO room for e.g. a supernatural archangel! '