Debate.org ought to use Lincoln Douglas formatted debate as required

1) My opponent again mentions Public Debate, but again fails to even define what it is, why it's significant, why it should be prefered, or any corolation to the debate whatsoever. So there's no real reason to look at public debate in this round. My opponent has still created an unfair burden, to prove LD as superior. The fact is, I just have to show that it should be used on Debate.org; the resolution doesn't state, "Debate.org ought to us Lincoln Douglas formatted debate over all other forms of debate." In that case, I would have to prove LD superior, but I don't in this round. 2) On to the question of cross examination. I stated that a run-in would be highly probably because of the shortened time, my opponent offers no warrent as to that it won't happen in response. Argument posting times could be required to be shortened in order to make it more probably. And, like I mentioned before, a forum board can be used if a run-in doesn't occur. My opponent still doesn't refute the point that we can always do without Cross-ex, but even if we do need it, it's plenty possible to do. As per voting, judges for LD rounds are told to never vote primarily off of the Cross-ex alone; it's the arguments that's the meat of the debate. 3) My opponent refutes argument three by saying that LD is limited to topics that a value and critereon can be applied to. This isn't true at all. I can apply a value and criterion to just about anything. Like the resolution my opponent suggested in his last round, "Reggie Bush has had a successful carrier". I can value Career Success and use a criterion such as Overall Performance. There's no limitation on value structures. But furthermor, I argue that it's because Debate.org is mostly ready for LD as it is, it's easier for everyone to just modify this site and then create another site, because it would create less work. ---------- 1) LD Is Structured My opponent is completey correct when he says Debate.org is capable of LD debate as it stands right now. Which is why you must vote PRO for two reasons. 1. Because Debate.org can carry it out right now, you must now make LD Debate required. That's the next step to ensure anyone who wants to debate LD WILL debate LD, rather than running into people who just want to rebel from what you've proposed. 2. Because Debate.org can carry LD out right now, you must simply use Debate.org over other websites or creating another because it takes a lot of work to create such a complicated site; however, Debate.org as a whole isn't too difficult. 2) LD is Commonly Used My opponent claims I have no statistic that composes the majority of this site; however, he said literally the sentence before "This site, as a debate forum, already attracts LD debaters." My opponent has already conceded to this fact as true because he uses it himself; therefor, your only option is to agree with the PRO. It's because LD debaters come to this site that you must require LD format to be used, simply because it will not only attract more LD debaters, but because it will make your debaters happier. --------- Summary To clarify, these weren't really attacks. They're more just neutral summaries and not independent arguments. But for those two key arguments, you clearly see the PRO side of the debate is winning and therefor, you must vote PRO. Thank you for your time and reading the debate.