imagination is the opposite of reality, not now and now

Real is in fact real as it will be, if something is going to be real--it will transform into just that. Now=reality+future=reality+future is realityPro more or less admits that the past is a part of reality, at least considering his definition of "now" which is "physical experience" and "past" which is "memory of physical experience". Pro isn't arguing that memory of physical experience is not reality. Primarily because it obviously is reality. Past=reality You could even argue that the past makes the present reality, obviously without the past we would not have reality as it actually is. Past=makes reality=therefore is reality. Once again, even the future is a part of reality as it is not a dream in itself. As explained in round three--someone can have a ambition to become a businessman [or indeed anything] and then they can be that in the future. Thus, it is not a part of their imagination and becomes a reality. Now, if we describe what happened 10 seconds ago [as Pro argues] we are without doubt describing reality. One could have given oral sex to their partner 10 seconds ago; and it is a reality. Additionally, you could have cooked some food; and it is still a reality. Me picking an orange in my garden 10 seconds ago is also a reality, because I now have the orange in my hand. Orange in my hand=me having picked it. Me having picked the orange=reality. Without the orange, reality would simply not exist. The orange=an object belonging to reality. Anything that has happened 10 seconds ago is a reality. Once more, 2+3 oranges=5 oranges. These 5 oranges=reality. Pro somewhat contradicts their argument by re-introducing the 2+2+5 argument as he argued in round two that were numbers were a product of the imagination and not part of reality anyway. Naturally, numbers are part of reality. Now relating to the superman argument, I didn't exactly say that he *only* becomes real by appearing on screen. My argument was that he can become reality by someone being inspired by him in the film and then becoming him. By purchasing a superman outfit, cultivating some skills, and practising their superman status, they CAN become the superman. Possible is impossible by belief, and impossibilities are imaginary. Moreover, if Pro believed he was G-d or a god he maybe could create things in reality, He could potentially create a godly meal, or he could create a godly house for himself. He could surely build on his abilities and maybe even convince some people into thinking that he is god, thus making it a reality for them.And who is anyone who argue with this reality? False=opinionOpinion=reality+Harry Potter=British film=reality. The Harry Potter film in fact took place in reality. Most importantly, "imagination is not a dead nation" as Pro argues. The imagination is simply part of an individuals mind, which is thus a part of reality. The mind of a person creates reality. A person wants to build a castle=person builds a castle. The person only built the castle in the first place because the dreamed it in their mind, I.E imagination, and then it became an ambition of theirs. Ambition=action=reality. The ambition derives from the imagination. Concerning Pros point about building a house and it being the same as the one he envisions in his mind. If he has made the house how he's thought he would make it and based it on the image in his mind, then it certainly would be the same house. It would only be a different house if he didn't use the image in his mind to create it and thus made it into a different and contrary house. One could argue that religion is based on people creating things in reality from their mind. A person thinks about G-d=person writes passages relating to the G-d=person becomes a prophet=person's writings gain followers=the G-d becomes real. Therefore, we have a deity that people entirely believe in and consider real. The G-d is not imaginary, but a real being.