There is no god and evolution is a fact.

Evolution is a theory"The occurrence of evolution in this sense is fact. Scientists no longer question whether descent with modification occurred because the evidence is so strong. Jus like gravity. Gravity is a fact, the way gravity works is a theory. "According to this analogy, evolution is fact but, what works evolution is theory. You make evolution into both a theory and a fact, not just fact. Not every part of evolution can be quantified. Simply stating the occurence of evolution is a fact does not make the mechanics behind evolution a fact. Even evolution itself began as 5 seperate theories. I'll grant you things do evolve from one point in time to another, so evolution occurs. But, science cannot explain the cause of evolution, there are no facts expaining what drives evolution, therefore, evolution occurs, but, it still is overwhelmingly a theory. Fossils"I stand by my theory and I challenge you to find another reasonable explanation. "I believe I did give an explaination in round 3. A fossil exists because something died and became petrified in stone. The fossils existence is due to the death of another being. Similarities"It certainly could be possible, although many similarities in DNA and bone structure have been found between humans and apes. "So it could be possible? Are you are admitting evolution may not be true? The rest of your explaination only says they are similar. It does nothing to disprove that God created chimpanzees and men to be similar. "We see in the picture that the earliest stages of the embryo of any animal is similar to each other. Eventually they will change but we see that every animal has the same beginning. This supports the evolution theory by establishing the resemblance of every animal. "I believe there are only two animals in that picture. How did you get from the beginning point of 2 animals to the end claim "the embryo of any animal is similar"? Furthermore, even if we accept all embryos are similar how do we get from that step to there must be a common ancestor? Natural Selection v CreationismThey are in constant disagreement with each other. What about Theistic Evolution? If for the present moment we accept there was a god why couldn't a god be there to indirectly guide the process. I mean the formation of DNA is so inherently complex that intelligence must have been involved somewhere down the line. And if we accept the pantheistic notion of god then god is guiding all. God"We are presumably talking about the God made popular in the bible"You merely stated you were going to disprove God. You did not specify which god you were going to disprove meaning you opened this point up for interpretation. Luckily for you, I only interpreted it to mean the pantheistic philosophy on god (I could have found more interesting interpretations). First moverMy opponent is basically stating time has always existed. But, according to Stephen Hawking this is false. Time has a beginning and that beginning is the beginning of the universe. (2) Time has not always existed which means there must have been a first mover. Time well began at some point. There must have been something to begin it. The disproofThis disproof is based upon the god of the bible. Since you did not define God it was open to interpretation. This disproof of god holds no sway for deism (3), panentheism (4), pantheism (5), or Zoroastrianism (6). Deism holds god is impersonal therefore, is not benevolent and would have no reason to get rid of evil. Panentheism teaches the universe is part of god. Pantheism has been explaine above. Zoroastrianism basically holds there are two main gods one is good and one is evil and that the good will eventually triumph over the evil. I realize it is MUCH more complicated than what I just said but, you most likely do not want a full explaination of Zoroastrianism. My two answers to the disproof in relation to the Christian god:1) In order for something to be described as "good" there must be that which is "not good" or in other words evil. You cannot have overwhelming good without evil. God allows evil so He can be described as good.2) God allows evil for an good purpose. Evil is there for the purpose of good.1. . http://www.bbc.co.uk...2. . http://www.hawking.org.uk...3. . http://en.wikipedia.org...4. . http://en.wikipedia.org...5. . http://en.wikipedia.org...6. Zoroastrianism