KCA Debate

Thanks Con.1: The theory of relativity shows that god cannot create an initial state of time.Con assumes the universe time is all the time, but time is much greater, it's infinite. Time is one of the attributes of God.God created the universe which is one event in the time course , an event that has a beginning and therefore has a cause.Time is independant of events. but events are dependent of time. There is nothing that suggests time started to be simultaneously with the universe! The universe only gives us a way to calculate time.2: The possibility of simultaneous causation shows that matter can form without a personal being."Remember what I said in my last round: Imagine atoms A, B, and C. A comes into existence and instantaneously causes B, which instantaneously causes C, which instantaneously causes A. All of the atoms have causal explanation, and they all begin to exist at the exact same time."Well A must have a cause as it began to exist, right ? and the rest is just the nature of A but this means at a moment t , A can't be identified as A nor B nor C ? as it "instantanuously" mutates ! then what stopped this event ? this thing is not an atom, and at no moment can you call it atom or matter. and it still has to begin to exist! 3: The Wavelength Function of the Universe explains the origins of our universe without a personal being.You seem not to be very good with probabilities, an event can have a chance in 1 million to happen and still happen, once it happens you can call it miracle if you want but it really could have happened anyways. The probability of having a sentient cause is always 100 percent, for there is nothing that can undermine a creator to the universe. and this probability is higher than any other cause. " The universe exists because it is connected to a timeless, four-dimensional hypersphere. " If the universe that began to exist is connected to an infinite sphere that doesn't depend on time, why is our universe finite ?! How does the sphere do to start an event , knowing the sphere isn't sentient and therefore can't will for something to happen?! The 4 dimentional hypersphere just doesn't make a sense as a cause to a universe like ours or any kind of universe, except an infinite empty space. 4: The Wavelength Function of the Universe shows that a personal being contradicts the evidence from physics. There is simply no way of knowing what God wills then calculating the probability.If something has a small peobability to be, then He wills it and it is, the fact that the rprobability rain falls today doesn't say anything about God omnipotance, but about his ability to do what He wills.Things don't have to have a chance to exist in order for God to create them, so whatever probability you give for the existence of the universe it wouldn't undermine the sentient creator, except if the probability is 100 percent. which means the universe had to be whether God wanted it or not. then we'd have a problem.This text that you quote seems to have been written by a drunk atheist, or at least, one that doesn't have his full capacity to reason!Also you didn't show how he brought this probability of 95 percent, the universe as it is today has a much smaller probability to be. where did he start from ? the hypersphere nobody have seen ?! In conclusion,Con has based his rebuttals on a weak argument based on an unproved theory, and a series of wrong assumptions.