Freedom of expression should not be supressed by accusations of sexism.

I would like to invite a fellow debater to demonstrate that I am wrong when I contend that freedom of expression should not be suppressed by accusations of sexism and that the controversial comments I may make in the course of my arguments should be kept to myself. I would welcome a challenge from a male or female but I suspect I am more likely to receive a rebuttal from a man, as there appears to be far more male members of debate.org than there are female members. Interestingly, this mirrors the relatively low number of female legislators in parliaments around the world. Feminists often attribute this to sexual discrimination, but debate.org is completely open to both sexes. So why are there not more female debaters? One can only conclude that women, in general, are more interested in things like reading celebrity gossip magazines, chatting to their friends about relationships and going out shopping for clothes than they are in engaging in serious issues such as politics and current affairs. Of course there are exceptions, like Condoleezza Rice for instance. It would be interesting to know how she if she has ever met any really sexist men. I wonder… Visiting Foreign Minister: "Milk, two sugars love." Condoleezza Rice (for it is she): "Just a cotton-pickin' second there boy, I don't make the tea around here, I'm the goddamn Secretary of freakin' State!" V.F.M.: "Well if you're a secretary, surely it's your job to make the tea? What else do you have to do? File your nails and open the post? Now come on, darling, wiggle that sexy little bum of yours down to the kitchen and put the kettle on." C.R.: "How dare you? You freakin' male chauvinist pig. Let me tell you that I do one hell of a lot more than open the goddamn mail, you freakin' emm eff. Don't you know I also negotiate international peace agreements in world trouble spots like the goddamn Middle East?" V.F.M.: "Alright, alright! Calm down, pet, there's a good girl. Here, let me ask you a question. Are you married? No? I didn't think so. Now you take my advice, love. Instead of stuffing your head up with things you don't understand, go out and buy some pretty dresses, put some lippy on and I'm sure one day soon you'll make some lucky young man a lovely little housewife." Now that would be properly sexist, but I'm not condoning that sort of prediluvian attitude towards women, far from it. No, all I'm saying is that men should not feel ashamed to express their admiration for attractive women for fear of being accused of sexism. For example, it is common in England for a group of young men, upon spotting a beautiful girl, to chant: Get your t~ts out, Get your t~ts out, Get your t~ts out for the lads! Now, a women's rights activist might call that sexist and she might actually be right. However, it is only harmless fun and, more often than not, the girl in question obliges the young gentlemen's request. Incidentally, did you know that they have a similar chant over in Afghanistan, only there the men sing "Get your face out for the lads"?! The important thing is that the blokes did not allow politically correct dogma to interfere with their freedom of expression. So, if you think that men are too restricted in what they can say and do and that free speech is more important than the sensibilities of a pack of ethically-sound-sandal-wearing, sustainable-source camomile tea-drinking, Fairtrade carbon-neutral organic lentil-eating radical feminists, I urge you to vote Pro for a more relaxed society and a branch of Hooters in every town!