Scientific Evidence Supports Macroevolution

"I had merely claimed that scientific evidence supports macro evolution, not that it proves it. "The Naturalistic Version is proven false as Scientifically a Cause must be greater than it's effect, a mindless cause lacks a mind, therefore scientifically didn't cause humanity. so no Naturalistic Evolution is not only not supported by evidence but unscientific and proven false.", it is a common creationist tactic to equivocate the informal layman meaning for “theory” which means something close to “guess” or “hunch"I have not done this"The Theory of Evolution does not address the existence or non-existence of any gods, including YHWH."Then we have nothing to debate about as since YHWH(The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit) exists, He could have created Gradually(evolution) or at once(Bible) either way it's creation. a mindless cause has already been dismissed"and I do not find evidence for YHWH to be compelling"it's not evidence but observable facts such as Substance Dualism/Quantum Physics, DNA, First Uncaused Cause, Shroud of Turin, Objective Morality and Witness of YHWH(The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit)"Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry: Recent advances in genetics allow us to perform phylogenetic reconstruction, and trace back ancestry by following the progression of mutations. This method has allowed us to confirm, among many other things, that there was at least some interbreeding between Neanderthals and humans."Unless this has been Observed it is not confirmed, merely speculation, not observable, we have no proof that neandethals and humans interbred, similar genetics can easily be explained by that YHWH created species similar and at different levels(He created apes with more hair, and us with less, for example we have PS1 and PS2, did The PS2 evolve from PS1? No the designer just designed it similarly)"which may still serve some function or use but are leftover structures from ancestors who used those structures differently."Not proof for Macro-evolution(One Species evolved/evolving into a New/Different Species) but micro evolution(species evolving into... same species and adapting to enviroment)"but the fossil record is only one line of evidence, and in my mind not even the most compelling"The fossil record can easily be explained that YHWH(The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit) created species similar and at different levels an evolution is not required therefore not evidence due to, Similar design Theory."there has been extensive experimentation on this topic, including a 25 year study of E. Coli bacteria by Richard Lenski. This will be one of the focal points of my argument since I find it really fascinating."The Lenski Study did not observe One Species evolved into a New/Different Species(Macro-evolution), the species remained e-coli, it adapted to enviroment(Micro-evolution)"Evidence from observed speciation: this is the process by which new species arise, and they are arising all the time. There are, for example, 350,000 described species of beetles."Where has One Species been observed to evolve into a New/Different Species? unless that is observed evolution is not proven, also the 350,000 species of beetles are still, beetles. " Evidence from artificial selection: humans have been using evolution to produce domesticated plants and animals for a long time. Breeding big wolves with big wolves over many generations will eventually turn wolves into animals like the Mastiff. Breed little wolves with little wolves and over a few thousand years pass, and you get things like Chihuahuas."Has this been observed with naked eye?"Evidence from computation and mathematical iteration: computers are now powerful enough to simulate complex iterative processes like evolution, and have been used to demonstrate results that are consistent with the kind observed in laboratories." Computers are not proof, they are made by humans.My opponent didn't show any observation of One Species evolving into a New/Different Species, but observations of a species evolving into the same species for adaptation, adapting to enviroment, which is a fact.(For example we have different races, shapes, blood types yet are all the same species, Humans)unless One Species is observed to evolve into a New/Different species it remains an idea.