The Earth is Flat

Ladies and gentlemen, this is why we have people that interpret the bible in different ways, because they can come to many different conclusions. Daniel Refutations. I thought that Daniel being a dream was well known throughout the religious world, so I apologise if it seemed as though I purposefully left that out to trick you or anything like that. In fact, I had thought that everyone knew the context. Sorry again. Now, I actually do think that we need to look at this dream literally. God is these three things: (a) omnipotent (b) omnibenevolent and (c) omniscient. What this means is that he can effectively live outside of logic, and that he actually does defy logic whenever he sees fit. He is also everywhere, and is able to plant very specific dreams within a person's subconcious when they are dreaming. The word of God is in this dream, so of course we must look at this with the most respect and thought. Matthew and Luke Refutations. The only possible way to see every possible kingdom on the face of the earth in a moment of time is for the earth to not have any curvature which hides the kingdoms from our sight. Con makes an alternative which I cannot believe to be the case -- where the Devil is actually tainting the mind of one of the holy trinity. Now, it's not that this is not possible, but surely God would be able to stop this, seeing as how to he is omniscient. Regardless, the Devil cannot plant images such as this, when the wording of these verses is so clear. To show is to make apparent with objective reality, and you cannot be shown all of the kingdoms of the earth without them all being apparent to you. Isaiah Refutations. First, sorry for the misspelling of nations. Never thought I'd do that in my life. Anyways, I think that the most popular bible translations to English should be the most accurate, due to hundreds of years of re-translation and constant revisions. If we are to see that the Bible says "corners", then the word of God must be corners. I understand that the translation from Hebrew may be taking a few steps, but this is how it is meant to be taken. Even if the word of God had been lost in translation to mean wings -- so what? That does not mean that my interpretation of this verse was wrong or anything of the sort. I find wings to represent the wings of the Earth, holding it up in the ever weightless thing that is space. Where could a wing be, if not the underside of a plane or on the corners of a plane? Would they be placed arbitrarily upon the Earth, although this was never presented in scripture? I don't think so. If the wings are in the sky, then they are most likely pushing air down upon this Earth, making the mountains and terrain flattened even more. More flattening actually backs up the idea that the Earth is flat, because it is becoming more and more flat as more and more time passes. Sorry if this seems as though I am rambling, I cannot put my thoughts into words at the moment. Revelation Refutations. I must say sorry for presenting a picture of the flat earth in R3. This seemed as though this was allowed because it was not bringing up a point, rather proving that an earth can be flat yet have night and day upon it. It was a refutation with diagrams against your claim that I could not have had in my constructive case. I agree, I will leave this up to the gentle voter to decide, but I feel as though I am justified in having this. I am not really sure what your question means. If you can message me in PM and then perhaps put a screenshot of my response in your round, then I would greatly apprecaite that (pictures do not take up any space). General Refutations"I wonder if Pro has ever spread icing on a cake? Was that cake flat? No! So. .. "The cake is flat if you spread it with force that removes any and all variations in landscape. "How, unless the World wraps around (as I say it does) could you have a continuous area? This verse argues for the spherical Earth, not the flat Earth (thanks Pro)! "An infinite plane does have corners. This is just a proof that is geometric and I do not have much space to prove that infinite planes have corners, but trust me, they do. "distance of the two Easts"This could mean north-east and south-east. They satisfy having *east, which is inclusive of easts. "you will see the earth as a levelled plain"A plain is a flat, treeless area, whereas a plane is a flat, level surface. I think that maybe I have copied down the verse incorrectly, it is meant to say 'plane'. However, you will see that the Earth exists, therefore it has an objective reality. If you cannot see something does not mean that it does not exist, but if you can see it then it does exist. The earth being a levelled plane* is something that must have objective reality. Again, I thank my opponent. Because this is the last round I ask the voters to please read over the debate again, because there is a lot of information throughout this entire debate. This truly opened my eyes to my current interpretation of the bible.