PC Gaming vs Console Gaming

In this round, I will be exposing my rebuttals for Pro's second round. My fourth round will serve for counter-rebuttals of Pro's third round and eventual counter-rebuttals of Pro's fourth round if Pro is ok with it. Let's get going.Rebuttal 1: PriceFirst, the Xbox One and PS4 aren't at 400 dollars/euros, reason and source provided in previous round. Also, I'd like to mention that Pro here assumes all gamers are rich/in a cosy financial situation, both in his mention of PC and consoles. While I don't deny his calculations make it cheaper in the long run buying a PC rather than a console, I will say that these calculations are adressed to a very restricted group of gamers who can manage to afford that. Now, we all know that at least 80%(average guessing, but more than 70% is a certainty) of the gaming community is NOT rich enough to afford 5 games a year, yet alone on a "beast" 1000 dollars PC. Two thousand dollars/euros in the span of six years is just too much for most of the community, who has only money for two-three games a year, and these include birthday/christmas presents that you don't pay. I know what people are going to say to me: "Get a job"? As I already mentioned earlier, I'm adressing the largest community possible, whether it be on PCs or consoles. And that includes people who are too young to legally have the right for a job and are entirely dependant on their parent's financial situation in order to play video games. Besides, for most people, even getting a job wouldn't cut it. Interferences such as taxes, food, water, electricity, internet, family, etc... are costly, and don't leave your average gamer much money or time to afford/play games. The only ones who would be able to afford 5 games a year on a 1000 dollars PC woud be those who play video games as their job, and even then, I doubt most of them would have enough money to afford all that. 5 games a year doesn't sound like much at first, but when expanded on Pro's conditions, you can clearly see where the problem is: in retrospective, it would mean you would be able to afford in 6 years a 1000 dollar PC, it's insurance, and no less than 30 games, while affording you other life payments mentioned earlier. A gamer will usually settle on a maximum of 10 games(and I'm being generous here) for a whole generation of consoles. For a grand maximum of 10 games per generation, you will get in 6 years:PS4: 1309 dollars(on a basis of 349 dollars the console)Xbox One: 1309 dollars(on a basis of 349 dollars the console)Wii U: 900 dollarsPC: 1400 dollarsWe notice that finally in the long run(length of it provided by Pro), PC is actually the most expensive of the 4, by a measly 91 dollars. Nintendo 3DS and PS Vita are not worth mentioning as their price is ridiculously low compared to the aforementioned four.Rebuttal 2: ModsConsole games do actually have mods, hence making Pro's claim invalid. Far Cry 4 would be the best example of it. I think sandbox games should be counted to, as their gaming mechanics are similar to mods. Hence, I will be mentioning GTA V for PS4 and Xbox One. This one could go either way "realistically", as I believe it just comes down to if the mods manage to keep a large community of players on the game, and so it all depends on which game. While I admit that Skyrim is one of the best known games for it's mods, it doesn't however make any other game irrelevant, whether it be on consoles or other PC games for that matter.Rebuttal 3: Backwards CompatibilityOnce again, Pro's claim is false. Both Sony and Microsoft have established some form of backwards compatibility, the most prominent and well know being Microsoft's backwards compatibility system from the Xbox 360 to the Xbox One, announced during this year's E3. Sony has Playstation Now, a downloading platform allowing you to play PS3 games on PS4 in a digital version. While Sony has shown it's progressive disinterest in backwards compatibility(removal of PS2 backwards compatibility on the later version of PS3, no PS1 backwards compatbility on the PS4 who had untlil now been a constant of Playstation consoles), it's not wise to claim right now that it doesn't have anything planned in the future, especially after Microsoft's sensational reveal who made the Xbox One backwards compatibility one of the most heated topics of this year's E3. As for WiiU, it has always and still is backwards compatible for both Wii and GameCube games. Nintendo DS games can be played on Nintendo 3DS, and PS Vita has no backwards compatibility for lack of a previous console generation to backwrads compatible to.Rebuttal 4: Performance and GraphicsHere too, Pro is adressing himself to a small community of gamers able to afford very high-quality PCs. This point is void when related to the first rebuttal.Rebuttal 5: ExclusivesNow this is a tricky one. Making a list of exclusives of each platform would be just too long, and would surely not fit the character limitation of this debate. However, as far as I know, PC exclusives aren't legion. PS4 and Xbox One's either. WiiU, Nintendo 3DS and PS Vita on the other hand... Nearly all WiiU games are exclusive to the WiiU, the only exceptions being actually portages from other consoles(such as the Call of Duty franchise, as one example). Nintendo 3DS and PS Vita games are completely exclusive to their respective consoles. And by combining the total exclusives of WiiU, Nintendo 3DS and PS Vita, we most certainly crush in numbers the total of PS4, Xbox One and PC exclusives, so this point should logically go to Consoles. Also, I'd like to quote: "PC even has specific Genres that will never make it onto console like MMORPG games and MOBAs."Pro interestingly has had the same idea as I did with family games. Except that I have examples to disprove this claim. Let's start with the easiest one: MOBAs. All I need to say is one word: Smite. Available on PC AND Xbox One. Next, MMORPG. Consoles do have MMORPGs, an example being Final Fantasy 14: Online(available on PC, PS3 and PS4). Indie games can be found on the PSN, while I'm not sure if they can on the Xbox Live.Rebuttal 6: E-SportsWhile I can't deny the popularity of LoL/DOTA 2 E-Sports, I believe Call of Duty E-Sports rae more popular than CS:Go E-Sports. Most console players know the existence of Call of Duty, but don't know what CS:GO is. Most PC players on the other hand, know of both. While I don't know if CS:GO is underrated(topic for another debate), it dfinitely isn't as popular as CoD in general, and in particular E-Sports wise.That will be all, good day to Pro and the viewers. ^^