BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Abortion is wrong under most circumstances

Out of all America's Constitutional violations, abortion is the worst. Our founding fathers dreamed of a land where all men and women can live with the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Abortion takes away a person's right to life by killing it, plain and simple. Abortion takes away a persons liberty by ending their life before they can make any choices for themselves. And, abortion takes away the right to the pursuit of happiness by denying them all of the happiness that this earth can offer. This person will never have a childhood, will never have friends, will never have good times, will never grow up, will never fall in love, will never get married, will never have a family, will never grow old with the one he/she loves, will never die at peace with God and man alike. Many will argue that these unborn children are not human, and therefore do not deserve the rights of humans. I ask you too look from history to see the fallacy in this argument. Two times in our nation's history have violations of human rights been considered OK by society. The first being slavery, the second being the holocaust. Both times, the mass killing/torture was justified by saying that these people were subhuman. However, today, we know that these were lies. Many claim that these unborn children are human, but they are not living yet (as of the first trimester). This logic is also severely flawed. First off, even in the first trimester, a fetus has a heartbeat, brain, and spinal column. Even if it did not it is still a living being made up of living cells. If you say that something is only living if it has brain functions, you say that plants, amoebas, fungi, many insects and arthropods, and most liberals are not living things. People also say that a woman has the right to do what she wants with her body. And she should. She should have the right to choose what to do and not to do. She should choose not to have unprotected sex when she isn't ready. "But what if she was raped?" Let's deal with the problem, not punish the child for the sins of the father. I'm suggesting higher punishment and a crackdown on enforcement for rapists. It is completely unacceptable for this kind of a problem to exist in our society. But a child doesn't need to be burned alive by acid because of it. In conclusion, abortion is a horrible disgrace in our country. It shows a remarkable disregard for human rights, and even under most "special circumstances" it should be considered murder.
ban islam

I apologize, as in the last round I did not cite my sources, so I'd like to start off by posting those here. . http://www.cnn.com... . http://www.pewresearch.org... Islam- the religious faith of Muslims, based on the words and religious system founded by the prophet Muhammad and taught by the Koran, the basic principle of which is absolute submission to a unique and personal god, Allah. Muslim- of or relating to the religion, law, or civilization of Islam. Koran-the sacred text of Islam, divided into 114 chapters, or suras: revered as the word of God, dictated to Muhammad by the archangel Gabriel, and accepted as the foundation of Islamic law, religion, culture, and politics. . http://www.dictionary.com... . http://www.dictionary.com... . http://www.dictionary.com... Given these three definitions, allow me to go through my opponent's lines one by one. "a muslims follows the koran" This statement is true. A Muslim is part of the faith that follows the Koran. "no arguments can exist for islam" Based on the previous statement, my opponent seems to believe that if one follows the Koran, they are not radicalists. However, given that a Muslim is a follower of the religion of Islam, it is safe to say that Islam has the same statistic of radicalists as I pointed out in my first argument. Finally, given that I have proved that Islam is the same as Muslims, I would like to jump back to my first statement, which I stated, " That means that only about .006625% of the Muslim population is "extremist". Given this number, the odds are extremely low of a Muslim extremist entering the country. Therefore, I do not believe that Muslims should be banned outright from the country. There may need to be work done on background checks, but to ban them entirely is ridiculous. " To which my opponent stated, "this is true," and then asserted that Muslims and Islam are two separate entities. However, since a Muslim is a person of the Islamic faith, my point still stands.
ban islam

First, I'd like to say I find my opponent's first statement a little confusing, so I feel like I cannot properly respond to it. I would be very grateful if they decided to clarify it in round two. The number one argument I hear from people who want to ban Muslims from entering the country is that they are terrorists. However, the Muslim population is 23% of the entire population of the world. So based on a recent study, only about 106,000 Muslims belong to extremist organizations. That means that only about .006625% of the Muslim population is "extremist". Given this number, the odds are extremely low of a Muslim extremist entering the country. Therefore, I do not believe that Muslims should be banned outright from the country. There may need to be work done on background checks, but to ban them entirely is ridiculous. I eagerly await my opponent's response.
Designer Babies

I think that designer babies are a waste and they shouldn"t be allowed. They can lead to discrimination, death, an elite race, and they are a huge waste of money. Performing the research is deadly and we can"t have people risking their lives for something that will just help the wealthy create a "perfect person". We don"t know if the babies will be healthy when they are born. As I said, it"s a new technology and it would be dangerous to perform on humans.
Designer Babies

In conclusion, I believe that people should be able to have designer babies, whether it is for the sake of saving someone"s life or just because they want their child to lead a better life by being more athletic, better looking or anything of that sort. Designer babies could change the world for the better, possibly even get rid of a lot of down syndrome, predisposition towards obesity, and other illnesses related to chromosomes, making the world a better place to live in.
Designer Babies

I said, you can"t ask people to participate in these experiments and risk their lives. I suggest that we stop testing to see if designer babies will work. There is no point at all to spend hundreds of dollars to create a perfect baby. People can die from participating in these experiments. They may not realize the huge risk of using this new technology. Hiltler wanted to create a superior race. He tried to kill off everyone that he didn"t think deserved to live. He made people think that because of how they looked they didn"t deserve to live. There are many outside factors that can affect your knowledge, skills, and strength. It all leads back to how you are brought up. If you work hard, and participate in activities that will help you with certain skills, you will be affected. People might not recognize the risks associated with these experiments. Babies and their mothers can end up dead. It doesn"t matter if they volunteer. You shouldn"t be giving them the chance to risk their lives in the first place. People who are born into poor families can become wealthy, all I am saying is that it"s extremely difficult. They don"t have money to go to college so they can"t prepare for their future. Also, there is no point. This will only cause bad things to happen. Designer babies can lead to discrimination, a higher, elite race of people, and death. Many people only think about the good, but really is there any. Being pretty won"t really get you anywhere in life, so you aren"t creating a "brighter future" for your child.
Designer Babies

The reason for playing God would to make people be better. The reason that people haven"t been able to play God before is because that type of technology hasn"t been available before now. You wouldn"t be creating a baby to have a baby. You would want to have a baby and you would make that baby prettier. You wouldn"t be having a baby just because you could haev a pretty one. Yes, I am saying that someone should have a baby to save a living son or daughter. The reason that is isn"t a 100% guarantee that the baby will have all the traits that you want it to have is because this is a new thing. Over time and with more practice, it will be that you can have a baby with a 100% guarantee of having the characteristics that you want it to have. Nothing is perfect the first time around. You are saying that designer babies are a new topic and that people should risk their lives testing the procedures to have a designer baby. What do you think would be a more efficient way to test if designer babies work? You said that designer babies could end in a result like Hitler. How would creating people to be better, end in a result like Hitler killing millions of people? You talk about "outside factors" affecting people, what "outside factors" do you mean? We aren"t forcing anyone to have a designer baby, they volunteered. Do you think it is okay that they volunteered or do you think that it is still wrong even if they want to have a designer baby and be part of the experiment? Designer babies cost lots of money to make. That being said, only people with a lot of money would be able to have designer babies. Just because you are born into a poor or wealthy family, doesn"t mean that you are going to end up being rich or poor. You could be born into a poor family and become very rich. That being said, designer babies are available to everyone. Anybody is allowed to have a designer baby. It isn"t just for specific families. Any person can have a designer baby. If designer babies are a success, then people as a whole could become healthier, smarter, and less likely to get a disease related to chromosomes, making the human race better. Would you rather live in a world with people that have all sorts of genetic diseases, and people who aren"t healthy? Or would you rather live in a place where genetic diseases are a thing of the past and people are healthy and smart?
Designer Babies

Why would we need someone to play God now, if no one has before? What is the purpose of creating a baby just to be prettier? Are you suggesting that someone should create a baby for the sole purpose of saving their existing son or daughter? In your argument above, you said that having a designer baby is pretty much the same thing as having a baby naturally because you can"t insure that they will have the traits that you want. If you can"t insure that the babies will have the traits that you want, then why would you waste hundreds of dollars on trying to design a perfect baby? Designing your own baby is a pretty new topic. We have conducted very few experiments on humans. We can"t ask people to risk their lives in order to test procedures that would later be used to create babies who were more athletic or better looking. Many people agree, and have tried using the preimplantation technology with monkeys. The life of a pregnant women living in the 21st century is extremely different than the life of a pregnant monkey living in a lab. There is very little research on this topic, and it would be very dangerous to try and perform these operations on humans. Also, preimplantation technology can be very fatal to both mother and child. An estimated 80% of embryos don"t implant, or result in a miscarriage. Finally, there is no real purpose of creating an athletic baby who has blonde hair and blue eyes. Many of these traits are affected by outside factors, and in the long run, they can"t be controlled. Designing babies with desired traits can also lead to discrimination. Only the wealthy can afford to design these "perfect people," so the poor will now also be considered inferior to the rich in every possible way.
Designer Babies

I think that designer babies would be something very good for the world. I think this for a few reasons. One reason I think this is because designer babies could save lives. There could be a deadly genetic disease that gets passed down from generation to generation. If you had a designer baby, you could prevent that from happening. You could take out the gene that caused the disease so that the baby and future generations would not get that disease. Another way that designer babies could save people was if there was someone in the family that needed blood but nobody had the right kind of blood in the family or weren"t willing to give blood, you could have a kid and make sure that they had the correct kind of blood and save a person. Some benefits of designer babies is that you could make someone"s life better than it would have been before. You could make them better looking or you could make them a better athlete. Who wouldn"t want that? If you could have been born a better athlete or born smarter, you would have wanted that, wouldn"t you? People can be, now. People can be better people. But there is a rick. The risk of designer babies is that it isn"t a 100% guarantee that the baby will have exactly what the parent wants them to have, but with a non-designer baby, the kid isn"t going to have exactly what the parents want either, so it is about the same thing. According to Wired.com, a deaf couple in Chicago wanted to have a deaf kid. The issue is, is someone making their kid disabled the same thing as someone making their kid have blonde hair and blue eyes? Well some people think that it is and some people think that it would be wrong for someone to do that. Those people think that the point of designer babies is to make the life of a kid better and by making them be disabled, you aren"t making their life better. Another ethical issue is that some people don"t think that any kind of designer babies should be allowed. They think that changing the DNA of someone is wrong. Even though designer babies could save the lives of people, some people still don"t agree. They think that it is "unnatural". Biochemist James Watson said "In all honesty, if scientists don't play God, who will?" He thinks that "If we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?" In other words, if we aren"t allowed to change people for the better, who is going to?
Designer Babies

What would the world be like if people could design and customize their children? Many people believe that there would be an elite race. Only the wealthy would be genetically perfect. People could pick their traits, creating smarter, prettier, healthier, more athletic people. But what about the lower class? They would now be considered inferior in pretty much every way. Adolf Hitler wanted to create a superior race. He wanted to eliminate pretty much everyone who didn"t have blond hair and blue eyes, he wanted to get rid of people of certain religions, races, or anyone who was handicapped. Even though this is an extreme situation, it is possible. With only the wealthy being able to create perfect children there would definitely be a superior race being created. Currently, parents are using bio tech to create disease free babies, and some are even choosing genders. Parents can scan embryos to try and find the healthiest child. This is called preimplantation genetic testing and it is used to look for disease or even specific traits in an embryo. Parents who have disease in their family can do this to insure a healthy child, but it can also be used to look at traits that the baby could possibly have. Even though scanning embryos to try and have healthy child can insure a brighter future, it could easily get out of hand. So far, about 20 designer babies born in the US and this number is going to keep increasing. I believe that creating and designing a baby is wrong and it should not be allowed.
Designer Babies

Do you think that changing the way someone looks or how smart they are or how good of an athlete is would be something good for the world? I think that it is. They are called designer babies. Designer babies are babies that when they are still an egg, are changed in some way so that they have different characteristics. Designer babies are a very controversial issue. Some people think that it is wrong to change something about someone that is unnatural. But designer babies could save people. They could be the difference between life and death. Preimplantation genetic testing is a testing used to figure of if there is a defect with the baby when still in embryo. Designer babies are a very controversial topic. Some people think that it is wrong to change something about someone that is "unnatural". They think that it would lead to a superior race of people. With designer babies, you could make it so that the kid would be taller or prettier than the natural human, therefore creating something unnatural and superior than others. Designer babies also cost a lot of money, so only rich people would be able to have designer babies. But, I believe that designer babies would be something good for people. Designer babies could save lots of people and in many different ways. One way that designer babies could save people is if there is a genetic disease that gets passed down from generation to generation, you could stop that from happening with designer babies. According to Issues and Controversies, you could prevent the disease from being passed down into further generation, and therefore, no one else in that family would get that disease. Another way that they can save people is if someone in the family is sick, you could have a baby that has the type of blood or a good heart or organ to give to the sick and dying person.
Missingno. is the connection between Cubone and Kangaskhan

Because of my opponent not posting his or her argument, I will "finalize" my argument on how Missingno is a connection between Cubone and Kangaskhan. In my first argument, I discussed what Missingno was, which was a code of jumbled numbers that designers used to get rid of the other Pokemon besides the original 150. The other Pokemon either was later placed in future generations, or "shoved away" for certain reasons. One of the "shoved away" Pokemon was rumored to be a middle evolution for Cubone, and was going to be made by the player to choose how he or she wants to evolve their Cubone; either Marowas or Kangaskhan. And this was confirmed by the creator of Pokemon! My opponent on the other hand did not counter argue any of my statements, as I brought numerous proof; but instead just questioned, instead of arguing. Hopefully you will agree with the argument I presented and vote for me!
Missingno. is the connection between Cubone and Kangaskhan

With your next statement for your argument, you seem a little nervous and speechless. Not really providing an argument, so instead I will counter argue my opponents question that he or she asked. The first question claiming that the Anime is not canon. I will say that the Anime is technically canon because if we define "canon", it is defined as: "Another word for official. Used quite often in fan fiction to differentiate between the official story line in which the fan fiction is based on". In other words, Pokemon's Anime is in the same universe as the games. However, since we will exclude the Anime on your own terms, even though it is technically canon, we will. Instead, we will use the Pokemon Manga instead. Manga, by the way, is basically the Japanese Comic Book of a series of Anime. In this case Pokemon which supports my argument of Team Rocket owning the Safari Zone at the time. Stating that they were killing Kangaskhan's for a profit. Leaving the Baby Kangaskhan to fend on its own; creating a new species of Pokemon known as "Cubone". Near the end of your argument, I do not know what you were trying to say; so instead I will support my previous argument. Stated in the Anime and Manga, it is easily probable that Cubone is related to Kangaskhan. How does this connect to Missingno though? Because stated previously, there was going to be more that 150 Pokemon originally, but was "shoved away" in order to make the deadline for the release of the game. Stated by the creator of Pokemon himself, and numerous rumors, Cubone was going to have a middle form that allowed the player to choose how to evolve Cubone. Either as a Marowak, or Kangaskhan.
Missingno. is the connection between Cubone and Kangaskhan

hmm... The anime is not the games... I say the anime isn't canon. so what now if the anime is excluded? and what if Missingno. is a bunch of pokemon some long gone and others returning favorites... so what about... "Cubone actually being Kangaskhan's mother." Cubone is Kangaskhan's mother... LOL ok I'm done! too funny! Anywaysies Idk what to say...
Missingno. is the connection between Cubone and Kangaskhan

Misssingno. is a mess... and so? what if it evolves into Kangaskhan? Cubone can be male! Kangaskhan is always female! look at Kangaskhan's head and Cubone's skull they look different... first let's look at Marowak, doesn't look at all like a Kangaskhan. Now Cubone, hmm ah yes baby Kangaskhan... ok yeah but still... I don't see it...
Was Total Recall Just A Dream

More like an illusion that he had while her was trying to keep his personality alive, or he had the illusion to get an in-depth look at what if he lost to the villain, it's not a dream, not as he said it would be. It's not about seeing it,when you said you've seen the original with Arnold Schwarzenegger and proposed a question or an idea, and having a con like me easily refute that, that drags you down as irrelevant.
Employer useing facebook to hire

It is not an "unreasonable search". An employer has a right to know who he is hiring. If you were hiring wouldn't you want to know about the person before you hire them. Furthermore no one is forcing anyone to do anything. If you want the job, I want to see who you are. If you don't want to give it that's fine, but I probably won't hire you. The 4th amendmant only refers to searches against a persons will.
Clash royale is dependent more upon luck than strategy.

I suggest you increase the rounds, or else I will be having the upper hand all the time. Anyways, clash royale is partially a card game, and therefore the luck system. Sometimes deck with low elixir cost (rubbish) has managed to win as the enemy is overwhelmed with small critters. Moreover, it just depends if you get prince and skeleton army together or not. Furthermore, the chests give random cards, and luck becomes a factor. I didn't get prince for months while a newbie starting the game got a level 3 prince in no time. Is that fair at all? All I get is damn goblins and skeletons.