Beauty is Objective

Main point A Instigator showed us a mislead article , SUB A point- 1) this article is found random on internet, how trustful can it be 2) text are just copy and paste. Do you even try adding any of your thought? 3) the article is writer by Sarah J Jones who claim she is a fashion designer and selling her item online. can her article be accurate ? 4) is she trying to make more sales? 5) its just her point of view ? SUB B point- Beauty is Objective 1) There is definitely a mass basic idea of what beauty is which cause by media , B1.1)surrounded by racks of magazines adorned with photos of thin, fit and beautiful models and celebrities,These magazines first take away a woman"s self-image and esteem and then offer to sell them back to her one product at a time. B1.2) The increasing power of the media to define standards of beauty is causing many women to develop eating disorders and waste money on beauty products in an effort to alter their appearances B1.3)we exposed to hundreds of images from the mass media every day ,by age 21 typical American will have watched over one million commercials,the media preys upon insecure adolescent girls by placing a strong emphasis on the value of beauty and physical perfection B1.4) According to the National Association of Anorexia Nervosa and Associated Disorders, 47 percent of girls from 5th to 12th grade reported wanting to lose weight because of magazine picture B1.5) eating disorders have grown 400 percent since 1970 B1.6) actresses and models weigh 23 percent less than the average woman, and that the current media ideal of thinness is achievable by less than five percent of the female population 2)Beauty is but a word that is only known and accepted in relation to it's opposite.Opposites are imagined..they have no tangible existence within the totality of consciousness in which everything is of itself. 2.1)Beauty is of itself.All is beauty.There are no subjects...only objects..even we are universal objects 2.2)if beauty is entirely subjective"that is, if anything that anyone holds to be or experiences as beautiful is beautiful for example, asserts)"then it seems that the word has no meaning Sub point C Instigator is making a perplexed argue , by his Definitions of Objective and What will be argue title 3.1)I will attempt to show that Beauty is subjective, not objective. This will be based on an attempt to show that when people call something beautiful, they mean it gives them pleasure to see Definitions : existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought (from Dictionary.com) ***the term about statement of "it gives them pleasure to see", if its not an object, how could you view it? before its existing in the mind, how could you not view the object and understand its a object? 3.2) Pro will attempt to show that Beauty is objective; that is, it does not depend on the viewer. It will be acceptable if they show that the majority of beauty is objective. Definitions :Objective: true even outside of a subject's individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings (from Wikipedia) it does not depend on the viewer. and its true even outside of a "subject's" individual biases ***the term of subject is based on " will be based on an attempt to show that when people call something beautiful, they mean it gives them pleasure to see " overall, "BT "is "S "not "O" "S" ,is they mean it gives them pleasure to see "BT" is "O" "BT "is "O" if and only if , its true even outside of a "S" individual biases you get the ball?