The elites agenda is never their true agenda

First of all the elite, if we recognise them as people, who have significant influence on our society, are not a single entity. They are composed of a lot of heavily different individuals with diverse views and interests. Due to the very nature of capitalism, there's a lot of competition between the elitists in all fields, from politics to commerce. It is true that elitists with similar interests might cooperate, however the whole elite would never hold together. The general objective of important people is to make money or be successful. Therefore the elite is primarily interested in creating even more money and keeping it, the methodology depends again on the individual. For example, many, but not all rich will stick together, whenever taxes might get raised. They will try everything to prevent this, but not because they have an evil club with the intention to take over the planet, but merely to protect their wealth collectively. This creates the illusion, as if the rich are trying to push for an secret agenda, but they're actually only strategically enforcing a interest they all have. Just 5 years ago it seemed, as if green technology only hurts the economy, can only be achieved through government incentives and that oil is gold. But there were many innovative people, who found a way how to make money using the technology and so the market in the sector was created and many people got rich and many rich got richer. The oil companies know that, if we stop buying oil, they stop making money and so only tried to protect their interests, but other rich had other interests. The so-called elitist agenda is only a generalisation of what a greater number of rich people support. Now, because rich people mainly want to make money, their agenda, constantly adapts to the new environment. I mean adaptation to clients and suppliers, its competition and owners, improvements in technology, laws and government activities, and market, social and economic trends. This mechanism works a kind of like a company does. Maybe some random rich guy or two really want to get more control, but the majority does not, they only want to optimise the system for themselves to make money. There is no evidence that multiple rich are involved in a conspiracy. But I would also like to point out, that this illusion may only appear in societies with great income inequality and more indirect political systems, including the States. Whereas in places like Sweden, the 30 billionaires they have, have way less influence and due to a more democratic system and more extensive education the rich could not even try to enforce any secret agenda, because the people would intercept their intentions and stop them in time. The rich are adaptable, even in the US they recognised that inequality is a problem, more and more will begin to push for change and at some point we will say that is their agenda. They will actually do so only to make more money and to protect their wealth and this is no secret. However there will always be conspiracy theorists believeing that something else is going on. You can check a good video on the topic:. https://www.ted.com... clients and suppliers; its competition and owners; improvements in technology; laws and government activities; and market, social and economic trends. Read more: . http://www.businessdictionary.com... I mean clients and suppliers; its competition and owners; improvements in technology; laws and government activities; and market, social and economic trends. Read more: . http://www.businessdictionary.com... clients and suppliers; its competition and owners; improvements in technology; laws and government activities; and market, social and economic trends. Read more: . http://www.businessdictionary.com... lients and suppliers; its competition and owners; improvements in technology; laws and government activities; and market, social and economic trends. Read more: . http://www.businessdictionary.com... lients and suppliers; its competition and owners; improvements in technology; laws and government activities; and market, social and economic trends. Read more: . http://www.businessdictionary.com... lients and suppliers; its competition and owners; improvements in technology; laws and government activities; and market, social and economic trends. Read more: . http://www.businessdictionary.com... lients and suppliers; its competition and owners; improvements in technology; laws and government activities; and market, social and economic trends. Read more: . http://www.businessdictionary.com...lients and suppliers; its competition and owners; improvements in technology; laws and government activities; and market, social and economic