My opponent will not be able to win this debate

It's the second-to-last round, and it seems as if all is lost! But not all is lost! I can still post tons of arguments that I can repeat in the last round. :POh, and that was I typo. My username is iMabench, a classic parody of iPod and iPhone. Not to be confused with the epic troll imabench. " there is no "super pro"", my opponent says. YEAAAHHH there is! Look at the image below. (and yes, I'm that weird-looking kangeroo. ) "You didn't forfeit. " Yes I did. Look up there. "forfeit: a fine; penalty, defined as . http://dictionary.reference.com....... I pay a virtual billion dollars. Add in another billion for good measure. " You failed to define forfeit, so I defined it for you first, and because you failed to define the word first, you must accept the definition. " You posted something" Post: a strong piece of timber, metal, defined by . http://dictionary.reference.com...; Something: in some degree; to some extent; somewhat. . http://dictionary.reference.com...That makes no sense whatsoever. How can you "strong piece of timber" "in some degree"? Is that even possible? MORE REASONS WHY TEEMO CANNOT AND WILL NOT WIN THIS DEBATE1. Teemo has NO sources, while I have SEVEN. He cannot prove he asked airmax. No screen-shot, it didn't happen. And posting the picture will be a "new" argument if he decides to delay it to the fifth round.2. Teemo has unfair rules that make it impossible for this "9spaceking" to winWhile my debates are fair and actually loseable, especially this debate, Teemo twerks it around with ridiculous rules in such a way that 9spaceking has no way of winning. Fortunately I am iMabench and 9spaceking is a glitch, otherwise I have no chance of winning. It is incredibly unfair for the investigator to have to accept and follow the rules the contender post, as it appears later in the debate and isn't agreed upon in the first place. So please, to be polite, and please vote pro.3. Teemo still uses less characters overall than I did, and because such, I have spent more effor and made the stronger argument. Using Microsolf Word (another source! ), it is calculated that I used 984 words over all my past arguments and a massive amount of 5427 characters. In contrast, Teemo uses measly 473 words and 2505 characters, nowhere near my impressive arguments! And this only strengthens my hypothesis that my opponent is too scared and broke down in a heart attack before he could type of the rest of his argument.4. Teemo massively lacks structureWhile I have fancy bold fonts that outline my argument, Teemo fails to do so, posting long paragraph arguments and three-sentence arguments at maximum. This makes his stance very unclear and it only supports my stance that my opponent hasn't really spent time and effort on his argument, and becuase such, everyone should vote me.5. I have a drawing of a cute puppy, while my opponent has nothingYes, his profile picture is cute, but that doesn't count. It's like 100 times smaller than my puppy picture. People will vote for me because they love puppies. In conclusion, my opponent will be unable to win because he is lazy, (no offense), and based on his current pattern, he wouldn't post anything of susbstantial evidence that I will tie or lose this debate. His rules only apply to 9spaceking, and my username is iMabench, so none of his rules work against me. Should my opponent make new rules for me as the user iMabench, I already discussed this--it is massively unfair and not agreed upon. (I was very sarcastic when I said "I agree".