There is no Biblical evidence for an young Earth

My opponent attacks my first point with this statement: "Did God Himself write the Bible? Or did people write what they intepreted as God's will? Are people perfect? Here's the answer to all of these questions: No, Yes, and No. Therefore, how are you mistaking a mis-interpretation with a lie? That's like if I tell you 'The Bears ate the Panthers' and you told your friend 'Oh my god, some wild bears ate some panthers' when really I was talking about a football game, are you necesarily lying, or did you just mis-interpret what I was trying to tell you?" Now, my opponent uses the excuse that the Bible was written with human error. There are two problems with this. One, we hold the Bible to be our source of truth on Earth. It is what we Christians live by. Second, God DID write the Bible, through human hands. He laid it upon them what to write. God would not let all of humanity be mislead with human error. So, the Bible IS true, and its evidence is also true. "And besides, how can the world be 4000 years old when the first civilization aroused 10,000 years ago (the Urs)" Again, two problems with this. First, it is irrelevant to this debate. We are debating whether or not there is BIBLICAL evidence. Anything outside of the Bible IS IRRELEVANT to this debate. Furthermore, the Urs were not actually present 10,000 years ago. The Earth is not that old, so how could people be there without an Earth? I will prove in a second here the evidence the Bible gives us for YEC. "This document claims that dinosaurs existed alongside humans. How could humans exist with these things around and live? Now, why the heck are dinosaurs extinct? The Bible gave NO account of the dinosaurs." The answer to both of your questions can be found in the Bible. Read Genesis 1:29–30, and Job 40:15–24. These passages both describe dinosaurs, and how they co-existed with humans. The Bible both tells of dinosaurs, and their life with humans. These were just a few passages of the numerous ones mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible. Now, my opponent states that I have provided no evidence. "My opponent is giving no evidence on how the bible necesarily argues and supports YEC. For what I know, this is another mis-interpretation. Seriously, you have yet to give any PROOF of YEC. Adding up ages of biblical figures doesn't mean we can conclude 'A ha! So the world must be 4,000 years old.'" No proof? I have given Biblical evidence! Why can't you add up the years? Why not? The Bible is truthful, and accurate. Allowing the calendar changes, we CAN accurately assume that the Earth is around 4,000 years old. So, I have disproved ALL of my opponent's assumptions, while furthering my own completely. In short, my case stands with evidence, while his has crumpled. When voting on this debate, you must take the following point into account. This debate is purely on Biblical evidence. ANY evidence not in the Bible MUST be ignored, as that evidence is for another debate. Who gives Biblical evidence to back up their argument? Who cites the evidence? Leaving you with these thoughts, I conclude my portion of this debate. "Resolved, there is no Biblical evidence for a young Earth." Negated.