911 inside job

Thankfully the increase in heroine use [1], is not nearly significant enough to make such idiocy as witnessed in your statements common practice. "Each link has a different video"False. First no one is going to watch nine videos to appease your ego, doubly so when at least one of them is one-hour-thirty-minutes. .. Second it was a single page, with approximately two-hours-fifty-minutes of lunacy scattered throughout (even then it's only four videos, not nine; your public education has failed you! ). Since you have failed to even double check your own statements for missing quotation marks, or information from pages not used as sources (such as other pages on the same domain. .. ), the accusation of plagiarism stands. "Rethink 911 has the most professionaly accurate information. .. " and "Another great website is AE911truth. orgHere you can find more in depth scientific information from the same scientists and engineers etc. "Rethink 911 is not the most professional and accurate, since according to pro (a questionable source) AE911 Truth is superior. Thus pro just shot down ten of his own sources. "the CIA have been caught drug dealing"I actually checked your source, and it was utterly randomly tossed in. Any voters may check and see if the words drug dealing come up in any connection to the CIA. The worst allegation against them is "If you finish off the pests, you are out of a job. If they finish the drug business, they finish their jobs. " Oh no, those terrible CIA agents don't literally hunt down and murder anyone whose ever touched drugs. .. Wait doesn't that mean they're human, and thus not likely to murder thousands of innocent people since your sources complaint is that they won't kill enough bad people? "removal of all of the columns simsimultaneously beneath the intact structure"First spell check. Second why would they wait so long, and leave such a damning piece of evidence? Third why not just claim the terrorists also bombed the building? Forth this was all easily explained in the official reports: After the water supply to the sprinkler system was lost. .. "The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building" [4]. "there is evidence of molten steel"As promised, I'd reuse my third source (my 4th was a link from within it). "There is no documented evidence of this. Even if they actually found molten steel, aluminium (which the planes were made out of) burns well under the temperature of jet fuel. The mix of jet fuel, plastics, rugs, curtains etc. may burn hot enough to melt it" [3]. "Even if they terrorists really did hijack the planes ,"This is too stupid for words. What's your idea, that it was really George Bush flying them, and escaping via his magical teleporter? And he faked the phone conversations, black box records, and everything else with his physic powers; but doesn't merely kill the people who challenge the official story [2], because he doesn't want to harm innocent Americans? Occam's Razor indicates the more likely option is probably it. "It doesnt explain who put the explosives in the towers. "Already done, it wasn't planted in secret and the innocent terrorists mind controlled by the evil supervillain Mega Bush as a cover up for wanting to blow up the building under orders from the Jew Lizards; no everything needed was flown in via hijacked airplanes. Not so mysteriously, they haven't yet figured out how to make buildings airplane proof. Besides "planned implosions require months of preparation, including tearing apart walls to place charges, removing extraneous material from the building, laying miles of carefully measured detonation cord, and the intentional damaging of support columns. Even night work would attract attention from the cleaning crew, as well as the workers who came in the next morning to find walls covered with fresh plaster" [3]. Summery:He's lost all credibility to any of his sources. He doesn't even know what his sources say. .. This should be a no brainer. Sources:[4] . http://www.nist.gov...