The Big Bang Theory Is Unsound

I extend all arguments dropped by Pro. *Rebuttal 1*Pro has more issues with the Big Bang:"if it had happened then there would be more lithium. .. the Big Bang theory unequivocally predicts certain amounts of. .. lithium. .. must be produced in the explosion that is hypothesized to have started the universe. "My response:In the early universe, a process called nucleosynthesis is responsible for the production of the light elements, including lithium. Elements heavier than lithium are formed from stars, so if the big bang predictions are correct, as Pro points out, there should be a particular abundance of lithium produced by the big bang itself, pre-stars, which could be confirmed by the density of ordinary matter at that point. Well, as I explained earlier, the WMAP is a probe that measures variations in the CMB from shortly after the big bang, and it has found that the predicted amount of lithium (amounts of lithium are based on the density of ordinary matter) is in concordance with observation and the WMAP. Straight from NASA:"The predicted abundance of. .. lithium depends on the density of ordinary matter in the early universe. .. given a precise measurement of the abundance of ordinary matter, the predicted abundances of [lithium] becomes highly constrained. .. the WMAP satellite is able to directly measure the ordinary matter density and finds a value of 4.6% (±0.2%). .. this leads to predicted abundances [of lithium]. .. which are in good agreement with observed abundances [of lithium]. .. this is an important and detailed test of nucleosynthesis and is further evidence in support of the Big Bang theory. ". http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov...Click the link below the image if the image doesn't work, but the observed abundance of lithium is the yellow line, the WMAP's measurement is the red vertical line, and the prediction of lithium abundance by the big bang theory is the red circle. Notice the red circle matches with the WMAP's measurement and observations of lithium amounts. . http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov...So, the big bang predicts a certain amount of lithium, in the early universe, and the WMAP confirms that prediction to be correct. *Rebuttal 2*Pro also mentioned:"[There are] structures too large to form in the time since the hypothesized Big Bang. "My response:Nope. Straight from NASA again:"The galaxies that we observe today grew gravitationally out of small fluctuations in the density of the universe. .. the WMAP satellite measures these small fluctuations in the temperature of the cosmic microwave background radiation, which in turn reveals the early stages of structure formation. .. (roughly 1.2 billion years after the Big Bang), our region of space was probably twice as dense as neighboring regions. .. the inner portions of our Galaxy (and similar galaxies) were assembled at this time. ". http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov...We've had about 13.7 billion years since the big bang, and this provides ample time for large scale structures, like our galaxy, to form from density fluctuations which have been confirmed by the WMAP to have occurred within 1.2 billion years after the big bang. That's plenty of time. Click the link below the image if the image doesn't work. . http://csep10.phys.utk.edu...