Legalizing Abortion Decreases the Crime Rate

One, rapists rape women to get power over them' - how on Earth would you be able to make that assumption. Secondly you're also claiming that the world will not be accepting of the rape victim. The only thing that'll be affected is their emotional stability, which yes can prevent them landing a job, but no will not adhere to all victims. 'this isn't going to stop a rapist at all' so you agree abortion doesn't prevent all crime You're right 1 abortion will not cost as much as a child, however it appears you do not realise how finances work. It is cheaper in the long run to have the abortion, but not everybody an afford the immediate costs. Again you have ignored information I supplied too you saying that it can be cheaper monthly to raise a child. It is how you claim it will affect the crime rate. By singling out one brand of people, you keep saying people living in poverty will be the ones that get abortion (or low salary), but that in no way means they will be able too afford it. III - yeah sorry was having an off day poor reasoning on my part. 'How could the life of the father be put at risk? Isn't it the mother's that is put at risk?' so you're saying bringing another life into the world is not a big life changing event and that only the mother is ever genuinely affected. No the father is also responsible, fair enough immediate health implications fall to the mother. However as a decision morally the father deserves a say. You seem to misunderstand, I'm saying that the decision has been made prematurely. It means that anything were too happen both partners already know where they stand and will therefore be more prepared for the consequences. 'so this is almost negligible when counting countrywide crime rate statistics.'- have any results been taken? No so you cannot prove anything here just saying it's negligible does not make it so. The same can be said for your argument 'Well, I provided some statistics and evidence for my claim, and I will repeat some here:' - his is not statistical evidence, this is stats that mold in your favor. By carefully filtering out the pieces you don't want your argument can sound more founded when it isn't. 'compared to an increase of 4.1 percent in low-abortion states' This goes against your favor, abortion has still been legalised and the rate still increases. Again you've chosen countries where abortion tended to your favour stop ignoring facts. I have space so I'm responding to your last part as well 'So, abortion legalization will mean aborted babies' - of course it does and some of them are bound to be criminals, but not enough to make a difference 'not the other 50 won't live in poverty'- what so then that statistic is completely made up? 'And poor does not mean in poverty'- poor means survivable on low wage without many luxuries, these people will fine. 'if abortion is done more by the largest crime rate group'- it's the biggest crime rate group because it is the biggest group, no it will not have a visible effect. A small portion (like the negligible protesters) will be taken out, but certain crimes like that are usually gang organised and the spaces need to be filled. Incomplete data is still incomplete- extrapolating it is just as well as saying that an assumption has been made. You will only extrapolate the data that you need and not the whole. A method that involves searching still filters 'Fifty-eight percent of abortion patients in 2008 were in their 20s...'- again more pointless stats. 100% of people who have abortions are women, does that mean lots of people have abortions? no. Your facts state that a majority of people having an abortion are in less prospered situations. 'Poor people do use abortions'- I never said they didn't. I'm saying less people who want them can have them 'My opponent again fails to realize that abortions are cheaper'- you fail realise that what I'm saying is that if they can afford an abortion they can afford a child 'My opponent is correct in saying that higher-income states have less crime, but they won't have more significant crime drops because of that'- in fact they will, better policing, bigger force, better paid electives, more educated, more money going into the system and more chance to make something out of their lives 'thus the data is accurate'- I never said it wasn't I'm saying you are filtering out data. 'You haven't refuted any of my arguments' - I cannot. You keep regurgitating the same copied and pasted stats, that I doubt highly you know of their genuine sources that have been found by others, that seem to defend your case nicely. Like I said before you ignore the facts that oppose your argument for the sake of making your argument seem more favorable. The simple truth is you cannot possibly measure the amount of criminals that aren't being born. You can try, but it is impossible. I'll leave you on this one note, you can say abortion stops criminals being born. However at about aborting someone who could save lives. You cannot possibly count the number of potential doctors (and others of that nature) so how many people have dies because of abortion. Try counting that.