Christians break Gods first commandment by believing that Jesus is God.

[Con: "We learn from the Old Testament that no one can even see God and live.][Exodus 33:20, "Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live."]That is not entirely accurate. We can see from the following passages in Moses's time with G-d that more people than just himself saw the LORD face to face. This priviledge, however, was eventually retracted assumingly as a punishment for Israel's disobedience.[Exodus 24:9-11, "Then went up Moses, and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel: And they saw the G-d of Israel: and there was under his feet as it were a pved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were the body of heaven in his clearness."] [Exodus 33:11, "And the LORD spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speatheth unto his friend. And he turned again into the camp: but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, departed not out of the tabernacle.] Or even if we go further back in time to the exchange between G-d and Abraham concerningthe inevitable destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, this conversation also alludes to the factthat Abraham was speaking with G-d as if He materialized; [Genesis 18:22,23, "And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom: but Abraham stood yet before the LORD. And Abraham drew near, and said, "Wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked?"]The only thing that separates Abraham and Moses from the rest of us is the fact that they both were G-d's anointed prophets, or two Christs if you will. They have a special place in Biblical History as being Patriarchs; or those anointed persons who are responsible for entire generations of people. I hate to be presumptous about the LORD's intentions, but this is the best explanation I can come up with in regards to WHY He allowed both men, to include the band of Levite priests, to witness His Glory when normally doing so would have cost them their lives. [Con: If you want to make bold statements asserting that the prophesied Messiah will be God then you simply must back it up with Biblical evidence. If you do not then your argument has no substance whatsoever. So far you have provided no Biblical evidence at all that counters my argument.]Bold statements? I have provided my opponent with a substantial preliminary explanation as to how and why terms are used as they are used, and now I will move into the New Testament...which oddly enough my opponent is quoting despite his assertion that Yeshua ben Yosef is NOT The Messiah. Trying to use the Gospel of Christ as a reason to refute Yeshua seems contrary to logic, but nevertheless...[Luke 1:27, "To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary.]Joseph decended down from the accursed line of Jeconiah, which is in line with Davidic prophecy and the coming of the Last Adam. But this point could have been a show stopper. If Yeshua had been biologically conceived by Joseph rather than that of G-d, then this would have completely voided out Yeshua ben Yosef as the promised Messiah. But from what we can see in 2 Samuel 7:13,14, G-d claims Jesus as HIS son while indicating towards his future at the hands of men. Technically, Christ had human parents. All those around the area knew for a fact that Jesus was the son of Joseph, but wasn't made evident until much later in his life that G-d had much bigger plans for his foster child;[2 Samuel 7:13,14, "He is the one who will build a house for my Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be his father, and he will be my son. When he does wrong, I will punish him by a rod wielded by men, with floggings inflicted by human hands."But since Joseph is Yeshua's foster father, proof of his residence upon taking Joseph's trade as a carpenter is sufficient proof that the Christ both directly (through Mary), and indirectly (through the revelation made to Joseph) was handpicked by G-d to be involved in the rearing of Jesus.