Harry Potter is a better series than the Twilight Books/Movies

1. Yes, the plot is similar. But there is a twist to each plot. For example, in the first book, it is about getting a stone that will save them from Voldemort. In the second book, it is figuring out where a secret chamber is, and who is behind the attacks, which happens to be Voldemort. In the 3rd book, it is totally different; it is about Sirius Black, a serial killer who may not be guilty. The fourth is about a sporting event of competitions. Voldemort is not the main problem; he does not show up until the very end. The fifth book is about starting a defense organization and rescuing Harry's godfather. Voldemort only shows up in several pages. The sixth book is more oriented towards romance and relationships, along with discovering who the Half-Blood Prince is (who is NOT Voldemort), and starting the very beginning of Voldemort's defeat. Finally, we have the seventh book, which is all about defeating Voldemort. This is not the same plot in every book, if you ask me.2. The Harry Potter movies are similar to the books; they just cut out the confusing parts that you'd have to read the books to understand. Twilight movies are not similar to the books. Last I checked, the Twilight books weren't good, but at least Bella had emotion in the books, contrary to the movies.3. No, they're not. Hermione Granger is another example. Although she's mostly good, she's a bit of a show-off when it comes to schoolwork. Severus Snape used to be evil, but he turned to the good side. Now, although he is good, he is still rather cruel. Ron Weasley, though good, has a tendency to be rather rude. 4. Harry Potter is very descriptive, and it does not need a graphic novel to help readers visualize it.5. I know it's an expression. But how many people actually use idioms in real life? Here's a hint: Not many. And just because Edward doesn't sleep and he is infatuated with Bella doesn't excuse him for watching Bella sleep when they aren't dating yet.6. I noticed my opponent skipped #6. VOTE PRO for CON not responding to every argument!7. In Harry Potter, morals are taught within every subject, such as death, friendship, family, ambition, bravery, wisdom, and yes, love. Twilight only teaches about love.8. It is even more difficult to believe that werewolves and vampires live in a nonfictional setting.9. At least they don't stalk each other, speak to each other in metaphors, or fall in love with guys that glare at them.10. My opponent skipped #10, too. Yet another reason to VOTE PRO! Daniel Radcliffe was a child at the time he played Harry in the first movie, and yet he managed to actually have emotion when he acted, unlike Kristen Stewart, who was a young adult at the time she played Bella. I literally cannot tell if Bella is happy or sad in the movies without the dialogue and narration, because her face is blank. A rock could play Bella better than Kristen Stewart. Unlike Daniel Radcliffe, who was JK Rowling's pick for the Harry Potter movies. Plus, the Harry Potter movies has won over 50 awards total. The books have won many as well. The Twilight movies have only won 28 awards, and one was "Worst Film" from the Chainsaw Awards.