ISLAM is a religion of HATE

DISCLAIMERPro has refused to satisfy his burden of proof by showing that Islam is a religion of hate, but instead dismissed the fact that he is taking a verse of context and repeated his original arguments, while ignoring my rebuttals, which usually leads to the loss of the conduct point and the points for arguments.REBUTTALPro repeats and argues, "Surah 9, verses 5 and 29, which state: 1. Convert to Islam, OR 2. Pay a special tax in an unspecified and unlimited amount in person to a tax collector who must 'make the unbeliever feel subdued.' This means a literal slap in the face, genuflection to the tax collector, wearing of special clothing which identify the wearer as a non-Muslim to the Muslims in the population, in order that tax-payer can be'protected[sic].' The question to the reader is. "Protected against what?" OR 3. Be summarily murdered."Rebuttal: Pro again takes the verse out of context and ignores the word "Mushrikun" which stands for "Polytheists" and not "Non-Muslims," and specifically Polytheists at that time who were fighting against Muslims.Patricia Crone, who is non-Muslim and highly well-known and proficient in Islamic academia, clearly explains: "Contrary to what may be thought from a literal reading of this translation, this verse is not a kind of carte blanche to attack any and all non-Muslim peoples. Here again the issue of historical context is so crucial for understanding. Verse 9:5 was revealed specifically in relation to the Muslims fighting the idolaters of Makkah."Pro continues, "Muslim apologists attempt to obfuscate the meaning of the final prescriptive Surah 9 of the Quran. Muslims have not been fooled. Muslims know what those verses REALLY mean."Rebuttal: This is nothing more than a baseless conspiracy theory. Where is Pro's proof that this is actually true? Pro has not offered one shred of evidence. Moreover, Patricia Crone is not a Muslim apologist, she is a Non-Muslim Scholar on Islamic studies.Pro remarks, "That manifestation was a trail of blood across North Africa and into both Eastern and Western Europe. The blood trail continues to this day to the railways of Spain and the United Kingdom, and to the office buildings full of 'hypocrites' in New York City in the USA. If this blood trail does not prove HATRED, I do not know what could."Rebuttal: The practice of some religious members doesn't necessarily reflect what the religion teaches. In other words, if some Christians were crusaders, that doesn't make Christianity a religion that encourages crusades and witch-hunting. The followers of a religion always have cultural practices which do not closely resemble what is taught in the religion, and when it comes to Islam, the same applies. To judge a religion by the practices of some of its members is logically fallacious.Moreover, if this is the approach Pro wants to follow, Pro has to prove that the majority of devout Muslims are hateful, which he hasn't done so far, and which we have good reason to believe is false.Muslims are stereotyped as hateful and intolerant as a form of racial discriminationAs we an see clearly in the study below, Muslim Americans are discriminated against more than any other group, which gives us a reason to doubt (if not dismiss) the general opinions we hear in the Media about Muslims and Islam. SUMMARYIn order to establish that Islam is a religion of hate, Pro should give specific principles and doctrines in Islam that call for hate. So far this has not been done. Pro tried to say that devout Muslims are all hateful and aware that they're following a religion of hate, without giving any evidence for such an outrageous, conspiracy theory.