Everything is a result of chance and there is a robust illusion that God exists.

Okay let"s examine your theory for a second. Your saying that an intelligent creator has created the universe, and we know this to be true because the universe could not have been created simply by chance. I then disproved that theory through quantum physics. And you say that the proof I have against your theory can simply be an allusion created by the intelligent creator you speak of" So let me get this straight, god exists because our universe can"t be based off of multiverse theory because multiverse theory is an allusion set forth by god. You are telling me that your theory is right, because my theory is wrong, because your theory is right? "I'm not sure you won't find a convincing rebuttal; if you do, it could be part of the illusion that a god or simulator created that they're not real." Are you hearing this? Your admitting that your defense against my argument only works if we assume that you are right "if there was a spaceship, how might it have emerged? "Oh, it might have grown as a plant?" "Hey, I found this coherent and impressive website online that emerged purely by chance". You"re just making a fool out of yourself. All of your examples are of someone foolishly denying that things we know to be made by intelligence were made naturally, and you are comparing it to someone denying that the universe was made from intelligence. The problem with this comparison is that we know a website was made by intelligence but you have still failed to prove that the universe was made by intelligence. You have done literally nothing to prove that your theory is correct. All you have done is say that if your theory is correct my theory could simply be an illusion. So cut the crap and let"s see your scientific evidence, please I"m dying to see it, oh wait! You said yourself that any science I throw at you could be an illusion so I guess it goes both ways doesn"t it. Which means that anything you say to prove your theory right could just be an illusion too. So that means you can"t prove your theory right, which means you ARE simply blindly fallowing what you believe in. which proves that the theory you have is simply just an illusion created to rationalize your own beliefs. Farther more if you are saying that multiverse theory is just an illusion than you are saying that the physics behind that theory are an allusion, if you believe that science is an allusion than you are claiming that the science we have discovered so far, the science and roles and order you yourself pointed out are not real and therefor the universe truly doesn"t run on order at all. In conclusion You"re not arguing! Or debating! You are simply assuming that your theory is true and since you believe your theory is true, you assume anything that goes against your theory is simply a part of the allusion, that"s not going to fly. you have denied yourself all scientific influence and therefor have denied any knowledge we know as the human race, yet your argument is based upon the universe as we know it being created. If you are to accept that the universe was created you must accept science and you have not, you have rejected it simply because it goes against what you believe. That"s not an argument, that"s cowardice, your hiding behind the idea that if you are right than you can deny anything I say, therefore you can never be proven wrong. Except I just did" so obviously there is no allusion, only the one inside your head.