BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

In ethics, there should be either a right or wrong answer. In everyday life, there is always either a direct right or wrong answer. Many people have a one sided view opinions, which others could agree or disagree with. Without a right or wrong view, there could not be laws to ground society. People always need to draw the line one way or another. Without right or wrong, societies will be thrown into chaos and disorder. It is why laws are created, in part to keep society moral. Laws help to control some of our human desires as a check and balance in order to keep people alive in society. That is why in society, there are people who create and to understand them. This help in finding out, which laws are right and which laws are wrong in certain situations. Then that is why when a law is broken, then there is correct punishment in associated with it that is fair. Without that, some people cannot think or judge clearly for themselves. People needs a guiding force, a set of rules to live by. Some individuals may not be able think rationally; they become rule breakers and murders. For example, it is right for the people of Islam to treat women in the 21st century in the style that they are most comfortable with? Should others view that as ethical, and just because it is their belief then they have the right to do that, especially if it is in the name of their religious believes? How long can religious believes outweigh social and ethic morals? If that is the case should all Mormon have more than one wife? Not all religious believes are up to modern and today"s standards. Ethical rights and wrong in a way help keep people and religious believes up to date on their beliefs and standards to be in line with modern times. Standards and societies keeps on evolving, so should also people and religion keep on evolving to become modern. Just like religion, ethical values and standards, people are not born with, but they are taught and raised by those around them as part of socialization. Even though the world is very mixed and different place, there have to have certain modern standards that are the same throughout the world no matter what. One reason is because after all, everyone is human, and human have to have to be similar with one another in at least one standard or another. Another is that ethics is something that is taught with a clear distinction of what is right or wrong. In different societies and cultures, even though they may have different ethical rules, there are certain ones that transcend that, for example, the ramification of murder, wither or not it done for a clear and justified rational reason. Basically, the basic definition of ethics is a set of rules that help to set one"s judgment on wither something is wrong or right. It comes from the Greek and Latin word meaning moral. In order to be moral, societies have to create and invent laws to follow by, and have people who understand them as not all laws apply for that certain situation.
Self-diss rap battle

I accidentally spray people in washrooms when I take a pissPlus I'm so weak I lift a piece of paper and sprain my wristI'm a socially awkward nerd who couldn't even make the choirThe notes I sang shattered mirrors, music skills I can't acquireThe worst fighter in the world, even teenage girls tend to push meI'm so feminine if I was an action figure, I'd come with a p*ssyAround my area there are a lot of hunnys that I'm spottingBut I'm scared because my arm pits smell like onions that are rottingIf I tried talking to one I would have a stroke and my heart would stopI'm so uncool my idea of a good time is hanging out by a barber shop-----I'm the victim in this battle, Pro is doing the clownin' todayHe brought Sexy Back and pushed Justin Timberlake out of the wayAnd when it comes to altercations, Pro knows how to to entice 'emChuck Norris prays to InVinoVeritas at night, and asks him not to fight himPro is also Godlike with a trigger, but he doesn't have to pull itHe just thinks, and lightening bolts come out instead of bulletsSo I don't really know what I'm doing on this MondayBut I know that one is blessed if they are like Pro in one way...Peace.
Self-diss rap battle

I’m a sadistic, hippophilic necrophile? That’s just beating a dead horse.I like to get drilled in my face ‘til my gay voice gets hoarse.Had a wife of five years, and we were happy, of course.Then found out she was an oven mitt–and had filed for divorce.I visited DDO one day, searching for a sexy wench.And unfortunately, the only taker was imabench.I’m desperate. I bribe fat chicks with Butterfingers.Sucked imabench's chode last year, and the taste still lingers.My punchlines aren’t clever, and I rap like a loser,And get banged in the a*s more than an imprisoned child abuser.RT isn’t really atheist, just modest about his divinity.He snatches every model that appears in his vicinity.Oh, you need more proof, son? Just check his profile picture.He catches them b***hes like his cock be a constrictor.Unit for measuring pornstar d**ks? That's the nano-Rational_Thinker.He makes asses into goldmines when he excavates girls’ stinkers. RT has immense skills and prods b***hes like cattle,And that’s why it’s clear who should win this rap battle.
Self-diss rap battle

Oh man...My life is so sad when I have no plansI make sure nobody's looking and smell my toe jamI'm so odd that in school I was scared to talk to girls at dancesAnd I think my ear wax smells good under certain circumstancesMy pocket protectors have pocket protectorsA nerd that's known for snitching, I crack hard under pressureI did have a girl one time she gave lots of demandsBut breaking up with her was easy, I just had to wash her off of my hand---Pro is God's gift to women and can lay a babe for hoursI pump once, cry, feel dirty and need to take a showerA sad case is what I am, an unemployed dick jerker While InVinoVeritas breaks open more boxes than a warehouse workerAnd a plumbing job is the only way I could lay the pipeI have so much estrogen I could get in free on lady's nightInVinoVeritas is just an amazing character this guy's liveWhen he spits, 2Pac raises from the dead to give him a high five
Self-diss rap battle

Collab with Bieber? I’m way below that level.Full-time Janitor, yo, so you can call me the Dirt Devil.You’ve got guns, son? I’ve got toilet scrubbers.The only magnums I got are a pack of unused rubbers.Won't ever get laid. The ladies always refuse.Whenever I jerk it, my penis files charges of abuse.I send my dog to shelters so I can say I pounded a b***h.Bottom line is I’m a scumbag. I belong in a ditch. --- My ability to rap is like Limbaugh’s ability to be rational.While I’m playing in the playpen, RT is going national.RT got the rap game down to a science.Even Dr. Dre asked him for an alliance.Even chopped off my arms, but he’s still the best rapper–hands down.I should probably quit this battle since I just seem like a clown.
Self-diss rap battle

I'm such a loser it's kinda sad, I can't get my life in tactI try to rap, but even Soulja Boy said my lines were wackFlava Flav said that he couldn't even bare my bad rhymesNow crying to Alanis Morissette is my favorite past timeEvery picture of me ever taken is worth being deletedI'm so ugly that I'm like Michael Jackson with women I just beat itEven chess club nerds diss me, I'm an embarrassing guyMy hand stays stuck to my penis like Jim from American PieSometimes I resort to midget porn due to self-esteem issuesIf I died, my grave would say "Good. Nobody Will Miss You"----InVinoVeritas is a true king who will be retiring meThe sexiest man alive, one that George Clooney aspires to beHe's a mac daddy, a pimp, a player it's all trueHe's had sex with more girls than I've jerked off toWhen it comes to raps I'm trash, a straight mess with the wordsBiggie and Pac visited him last night to tell him how jealous they wereHis teeth are platinum, and everything he touches turns to goldI'm blessed to be in his presence, the title is something I don't deserve to hold
Self-diss rap battle

Yo. Yo, yo. Yo, yo, yo. Check one. Check one, two. Check one, two, three. Check mate. Got fired as a mailman, ‘Cause I have terrible deliveries. Get escorted out of studios, ‘Cause I lack rappin’ abilities. All the ladies can’t stand me. That’s an indisputable fact. Tried to get with a dead b***h, And I still got slapped. I can’t start a rap career, Voice sounds like Richard Simmons’. Trying to spit fire on DDO, And still can’t get any women. --- My opponent’s rhymes are like a perfect Mozart symphony, While I am to rap what Fred Rogers was to the porn industry. RT screws sexy supermodels ‘til they run off with cramps, While I fondle old men and pay them off with food stamps. My boy RT flows far better than water, And I’m just a lamb that’s destined for the slaughter.
Self-diss rap battle

Yo yo yo, we gonna do a self-diss rap battle in here--y'hear? Ya'll betta watch out, 'cause Lil Vino iz back in da houzzz. Da rulez is dat we be dissin' ourselfzz and complimentin' our opponent, and whoeva disses demselves and compliments his opponent da best wins--ya feel me? First round be fo' self-introduckshun/acceptance only. Word? And all da roundz afta dat, we spit sum fire--ya dig? A'ight, let's do dis. ---(Disclaimer: This is meant to be a joke debate that parodies the many rap "debates" on this website. For all of those who participate in actual DDO "rap battles," and you know who you are, stop. Seriously. Oh, and don't judge spelling/grammar, for obvious reasons.)
William Howard Taft was the worst US President.

Lets start with the successes of William Howard Taft 1. Dollar diplomacy allowed the US to strengthen its influence in the western hemisphere by offering to but south American debt. I also garnered the best relations with south America and helped settle the growing paranoia of South American countries after the roosevelt corollary was issued. 2. Taft was a bigger trust buster than roosevelt and broke up double the Trusts that roosevelt did in half the time. THis included famous cases such as the standard oil court battle. 3. Won from congress the power to conserve land and used this power to conserve more land than roosevelt did. 4. Was able to work with democrats to pass important measures the authorization of the income tax amendment, the women suffrage amendment, and the direct election of senators amendment. Onto presidents worse than Taft Franklin Pierce who allowed the Kansas Nebraska act to pass, throwing the north and the south back into tension. He also encouraged the Dred Scott ruling that made slavery technically legal in the entire United States. Richard Nixon who with his indecisive economic policy threw the US into a recession and was the only president to step down from office to avoid impeachment. George W Bush Jr who incurred massive deficit spending with his tax cuts and got the Us involved in two protracted wars. He also committed perjury to the US congress by saying that the US knew that Iraq was building nuclear devices. Onto rebuttals 1. His wife basically always told him what to do Though it is true that his wife encouraged him to become president when he took office her health rapidly declined and thus was not in any position to advise her husband. 2. He was awful at press relations and could barely make a statement to the press No he was actually a very out going president and often campaigned over bills and reflections 3. He supported a czar like speaker of the house (Joseph Cannon) who controlled Congress and barely let them discuss bills No he merely stopped attacking him politically. Their is a difference between supporting and not attacking.
William Howard Taft was the worst US President.

Okay so he told Teddy Roosevelt that he would follow what Roosevelt had In mind. His wife basically always told him what to do. He was awful at press relations and could barely make a statement to the press. He supported a czar like speaker of the house (Joseph Cannon) who controlled Congress and barely let them discuss bills. He would have been bad even if the nation didn't have as high of expectations as they did for him.
Are Pitbulls evil mean animals. (Dont you dare say yes)

I will start by saying my points in this argument. Sources: http://www.dognotebook.com... http://blog.dogsbite.org... Definition of Evil: profoundly immoral and malevolent. Pit Bulls are definitely a dangerous animal. Some Pit Bulls can be tamed, but there are several reports and cases referring to the Pit Bull as being the number one dog to turn on their owners and attack them. According to Dog Notebook (2016), Pit Bulls have been known to attack children, the elderly, their owners; anyone that happens to be in their path. This includes them being the number one dog to cause most fatalities compared to any other dog. Pit Bulls are also a fighting dog; meaning they are meant to engage other dogs into a bloody fight until one remains standing. Yes, this would have been engaged by the owner of the dogs, but they run on their instinct and will to live. The reason this particular breed of dog is considered evil is mostly because of the lives they take. People have the stories of their child, spouse, or mother being teared apart by such a vicious creature. Several people have been apart of court cases because of a felony after their dog attacked. According to DogsBite.org (2008) 29-year-old mother, Marissa Abrego, faces one count of injury to a child, a second-degree felony. If convicted, she may face up to 20 years in jail and a $10,000 fine. (This was all from her chained up Pit Bull in the front yard!) Texas also has a deadly track record of Pit Bull attacks. In 2008, a child with the name of Pablo Lopez was placed into his aunt and uncle's care by CPS (Child Protective Services). They had a Pit Bull named Greco that ended up killing Pablo. (DogsBite.org) People have a very good reason to fear and call pit bulls evil for their designated stigma. Several campaigns around the united states have erupted from these vicious attacks. Several Cities and States have banned Pit Bulls from being owned and on private property. Even if the stigma around a Pit Bull is that they are evil creatures and should not be allowed in homes, they have a very good reason to say that.
Anarchy is unsustainable

p1: When two people get into fight, someone will shot another one. p2: Someone who loves killed person will revenge him, in the name of justice. p3: p2 repeats, but now with sides turned. p4: In this cycle, someone will kill people who love person he killed as well, because they are probably going to kill them otherwise. p5: Number of people in this madness will increase overtime. p6: Since there will be several cases of this kind, people who are not in groups will feel unprotected and join some groups. p7: Groups will become more organized with time. p8: Eventually, groups will make agreement about not fighting each other - law. And groups will become like police and judges. p9: Groups would have scarcity of resources, because they were at war. p10: They would steal from people who are not in groups. c(p1-p10): There would be large group enforcing laws and stealing part of other people's resources - government.
Anarchy is unsustainable

ya dont kow nutin bout me contre lad ya know en iruland we got anarchy up ur fat azes buy sheetin foockin ttacos out ur bums inta yur wee face. that anarchy and how is det a know good? dont ya las lie tit when beeg old swesty pop be slashin in ya face? i te;; ya yu dont know iruland anarchy did mu buen n me oppent said t i hub no anarchy buyt fak dat preeck he is dee beegest poopsuckker dof em all.
Anarchy is unsustainable

Resolution: People living in anarchy will at some point create some sort of government if their land is not occupied and people are not wiped out.Anarchy: Land with no government.BoP is shared.Rules: Images and videos can not be posted.Links can only be posted as evidence/source for challenged premises.No forfeits allowed.Round 1 is acceptance only. Con must not make new original arguments in Round 4.Round 5 is conclusion only.Breaking a rule = debate loss.
Teens under 18 should have more legal rights

Thanks for the message about my grandfather,. No we shouldn't penalize them because they are OVER 18. They aren't under 18. They can do what they want but as long as your a teenager you must abide by the rules in your house. Again, you are going against your own case. And your 2nd question doesn't make sense. I say that teens should stay how they are and listen to their parents. When they hit 18, I wouldn't care a single bit about what they do. Not at teens want to smoke, but they do anyhow because of pressure. That's what society does to a teenager. Teenagers haven't been on the planet long enough so it is important for them to learn from their mistakes. Overall, I believe that teens should NOT have more legal rights. For what? AGAIN YOU HAVE PROVIDED NO PROVEN EVIDENCE OR FACTS OR EVEN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. You have not said what legal rights they would get also. Enough of smoking. How about education? According to SB, Total number of high school dropouts annually3,030,000 Number of high school students who drop out each day8,300 Percent of Americans with a high school diploma85.3 % Percent of all drop outs that happen in the ninth-grade36 % Percent of students who repeat the ninth-grade that go on to graduate15 % Percent of students in the largest 50 U.S. cities that graduate High School59 % Percent of US crimes that committed by a high school dropout75 % Amount of money a high school graduate will earn more than a drop out$260,000 Percent of black drop outs that have spent time in prison60 % Percentage of Hispanic dropouts that were due to a pregnancy41 % Percent of US jobs a high school dropout is not eligible for90 %. Teenagers are already distracted cant you see? We don't need more drop-outs we need better education. If we want MORE rights that's selfish on our behalf. Coming from a young 14 year old girl, I say watching over teenagers is now hard today especially with more distractions and ads that come on. We are more vulnerable today than any other. People who vote pro, must not have read my arguments because I have provided strong representation from the people being polled and actually provided evidence. And may my last words be, if you vote pro, think about our future. What happens when we get more legal rights and more chances of bullying not being aware of that is happening and more people dying and more people not caring? Where will that lead us may I ask? Ask yourself, why? Where? Whats the point? As teenagers we should be focused on our future because what you do as present, determines the future. Past is past. We need to use our resources. Be happy. We all have the same materials, some of us are just smarter in how we use them.
Teens under 18 should have more legal rights

I am sorry to hear about your grandfather. 1. I did say in my speech teens have developing brains, we all have developing brains. Our brains develop throughout life, but reach their full potential at puberty. 2. Once they are competent, they will be able to make their own medical decisions, get a job without their parents' permission and a medical exam, leave home without their parents’ permission and own property. 3. People over 18 are allowed to smoke. Should we make smoking illegal for everyone to keep them safe?
Teens under 18 should have more legal rights

Your argument is politically stupid. You know why? Your question was under the age of 18. 18 is an adult. You are saying that 17 year olds are adults and that is completely irrelevant in this situation. And teens shouldn't smoke. You said in your speech that teens have developing brains correct? Correct so why would they ruin it by drinking, smoking , and clubbing. And i didn't say freedom was distracting I said some types of freedom are distracting from different people and focus in other things. You have provided no evidence. Back - knowledge is not evidence. You still have not said what legal rights they would gain. According to teenshealth.org drugs can...... (quote) There are no physical reasons to start smoking. The body doesn't need tobacco the way it needs food, water, sleep, and exercise. And many of the chemicals in cigarettes, like nicotine and cyanide, are actually poisons that can kill in high enough doses. The body is smart. It goes on the defense when it's being poisoned. First-time smokers often feel pain or burning in the throat and lungs, and some people feel sick or even throw up the first few times they try tobacco.(end of quote). Its not taking away their rights, its keeping them safe. I have friends that smoke and I know they don't focus well either. My opponent has no evidence and their arguments make no sense. They are going against their own case. Can you tell me what giving them more freedom is going to do when they already have limited freedom and abuse it at that. Proof, as an African- American child, my mother does not let me fool around in grades or anything. She raised me and I don't go against her word but thereare other teens like me who still defy it. I have a grandfather also who died from smoking at at young age. What good will it do? It can get you to heaven faster but that's pretty much it.
Teens under 18 should have more legal rights

1. They smoke.Many adults smoke too. Should we take away their rights?2. Giving them rights will distract them from better things in life.Can you explain how? And how is freedom distracting?3. Driving, smoking, drinking, clubbing, partying, curfews are too much for teenagers to handle at this age.In many countries people under 18 are allowed to drink and alcoholism is lower than in America, where the drinking age is 21. Many teens in other countries do fine without curfews. In western countries like the US, teens socialize exclusively with other teens. In countries where teens are treated like adults they don't abuse their privileges. Before the industrial revolution, people got married and had full adult rights at puberty. Census records show those who got married young had a lower divorce rate. Most of those youth never abused their rights.
Teens under 18 should have more legal rights

Teens under 18 should NOT have more legal rights. They smoke and are immature as is. Coming from me a 14 year old, teens are very immature and my opponent says its because we treat them that way. If we didn't treat them that way they would then shift and think that they are in charge of everything and under 18 you should do anything but be in the position of the parent. We would change roles therefore making them responsible for their own actions. My opponent also didn't state HOW MANY or WHAT legal rights teens have and what they should be granted more. Since they didn't, I will. According to howstuffworks.com, teens today have aprox. the same rights as adults minus 13. I cannot state what those are after countless amounts of research. If we gave teens more rights, we then would limit ourselves to giving them more freedom and distracting them with it therefore taking their minds of off better things in life. I think granted driving, smoking, drinking, clubbing, partying, curfews, and job opportunists are to much for teenagers to handle at this age. Point blank.