Miley Cyrus absolutely would win in the Asian v. Miley Cyrus case anyway.

「For example, there's a murderer. And if he says "I killed him accidentally" or "I killed him for fun(naive joke)" Then, do you think the judge would say " Okay. . manslaughter. "? 」" I believe you got me on the wrong idea, my question was actually "How do you know that that picture was actually showing discrimination? ", your example is irrelevant, because the judge already knew that the man have already killed the other person, then he'll ask why did you kill the guy. In this case, the "judge" totally has no evidence to indicate that Ms. Cyrus here is insulting someone, then how can that "judge" ask that "Why did you kill the man. "? "- You didn't say that can never be crimes without intention, right. But you wrote "There are no significance evidence say that Ms. Cyrus picture was racist or just merely a naive joke. " The word "racist" you put there ususally is used for actions but is more used for general intentions or ideas. Namely, what you wrote basically meant "There are no significant evidence say that she had an intention" _ Yes, that's true my friend, but again to be able to arrest someone for their intentions of a crime, that person need at least to have some actions that indeed PROVE that him/her is intending to do some thing, for an instance, I maybe assault you in the midnight, though I didn't kill you, but it's enough to prove that I have an intention to kill you. Otherwise, if intention is just a thought, then I think everybody once in their lives have that intention to kill, rape, have sex with somebody. "- I totally admit that I had errors in my example. But the point of example wasn't on it but on the part the singer makes excuses. Forgive me for a confusing and visibly different example. Love? If what Miley Cyrus did was for love, she would have donated money for African foundations or something. When you were in high school, have you seen kids imitating what others do? Why do you think they do it? In most cases I've seen, it was in purpose of making fun of others. If you've seen the picture, you can see that her friends all pull their eyelids to make it look slanted. That's totally different with just closing their eyes. But your question about opening eyes becoming caucasian discriminationis still interesting. " _ Base on this picture ( . http://shouldntbegaming.files.wordpress.com... ), I think Miley Cyrus did a normal pose that most people do, pulled her eyelids downward, I think most of people do it in a pose, even I did it when I pose my picture, is that a matter? About love, how do you know Ms. Cyrus have never donated anything? What if she donated in shadow, without media attention? In that case, maybe Miley has some love. "This world has been totally dominated by caucasians. And this world makes people think the normal criteria of human beings as caucasians. I'm kind of sure that if it was an ancient times, Asians who saw rare caucasian might have made fun of them by pulling their eyelids, noses, and putting makeup totally white. " _ Do you know that there are Caucasians around the world had donated for good causes for the Asian countries? Either Miley is racist or not, we shouldn't drag anybody's race into this. So my points had been given, Miley Cyrus picture is a private matter, even if she post it on her blog, it's still a private matter. Secondly, if just a picture be taken and somebody will go to jail, I don't think those who made fun of African Americans and Jews can still live until today, which to say that those who wear the KKK robe and have the Nazi sign will be in jail. Finally, there are no signs, no nothing to be a solid evidence that Miley Cyrus is racist or trying to insult somebody. Thank you for this debate.