God is possible

"The fact is that God is possible, let me rephrase, "nothing is impossible" to everything is possible." This has the same logical contradictions. "How could a God be impossible?" It would be good if you answered my last arguments but I will restate them for a third time ""I think, therefore I am" was invented by Ren" Descartes to counter hard solipsism it is a fact and is objectively true that I know that I am having an experience no matter what the nature of experience is it is impossible for me (or from your point of view you) to not exist in some form. "I think, therefore I am" is the only thing we can objectively know to go any further you must make three assumptions (the basil assumptions): The assumption that we experience the universe through our senses, The assumption that knowledge exists, The assumption that models with predictive capability are more effective than models with only descriptive capability. Any sentient being cannot know that any of these assumptions are true (even a god) and therefore there is an impossibility in the definition of a god ("A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions.") and as a being cannot achieve omniscience it cannot fulfill all the characteristics necessary to be considered a god. Further more there is a contradiction in omnipotence which is very easy to highlight. Can god create an object god cannot object effect? If god cannot create the object then god isn't omnipotent and if god can then god has something god cannot do either way omnipotence is impossible. I have shown you that there are two impossibilities in the definition of god and therefore god cannot be either omnipotent or omniscient. And as any being cannot be omnipotent or omniscient god by definition doesn't exist and it is impossible for god to exist." Please respond to this argument. "Here's my question, if God is impossible, then how did the universe come into existence? The Big Bang? No, of course not because that theory cannot be proved." Lets see the evidence and please in future when you argue please cite your sources. When objects are moving away from the observer the light which reaches the observer will be see light shifted to the lower end of the spectrum (and vice versa) [1]. When we look into space we see that all the galaxies are moving away from each other and we extrapolate back and find that 13.8 billion years ago all the galaxies must have been on top of each other. We can confirm this hypothesis by viewing cosmic background radiation [2]. Also lets say that we could prove the "big bang" never happened, placing a god in that hole in science is nothing more than an argument from ignorance. "Lets take the Hindu Gods for example, the Hindus have thousands of Gods, what are the odds that at least on of them exists?" Well all the hindu gods are intertwined so it's better to think of mythologies instead of individual gods. If christianity is right then five billion people are wrong, if hinduism is right six billion people are wrong, if islam is correct six billion people are wrong and if there is no god seven billion people are wrong. Lets look at hinduism, first we can see the changes in the religion from neo-animism to modern hinduism, we can see the incorporation of different gods from other cultures into hinduism [3]. Really hinduism is set up very similar to roman state religion. There are hundreds of thousands possibly millions of gods which have been created by humans but this in no way evidences a god any more than the many legends of giants [4] evidence the existence of giants. Man created god in his own image, bigoted, homophobic, misogynistic, capricious and racist. "If there is an almighty God, with powers we can't understand, then why would he be impossible?" Because the definition of a god is by definition impossible neither omniscience or omnipotence are logically incoherent something which I think I have already proved. "Atheists prove the bible correct, the bible says there will ALWAYS be atheists, so I thank all atheists reading this, because you are supporting Christianity!" This doesn't matter, if I write a book about the flying spaghetti monster with no supporting evidence and include a verse about people not believing in the flying spaghetti monster then does that prove the flying spaghetti monster? Also that is a very strange interpretation of the bible. So in conclusion god is impossible because omnipotence and omniscience are impossible no matter what the true nature of reality, you have not provided any rebuttal to my argument or even logical basis for god, all you have managed to do is make a couple of appeals to incredulity. [1] http://www.mso.anu.edu.au... [2] http://muller.lbl.gov... [3] http://en.wikipedia.org...(Vedic) [4] http://en.wikipedia.org...