BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
right and wrong is absolute, as logic is the measurement of reasonable

Why would you punch me in the face? Because you angry. Emotion = action (no alternative/choice) Why are you angry? I said or did something to make you angry. (My action caused your reaction) Why did I say or do something to make you angry? Etc etc Every action has a cause and a consequence. Cause past = can't change. Consequence future = not relevant. Action now = no alternative/choice. Predetermined. Punch in face -3 0 +5 total +2 Priority determined. Punch in face.
right and wrong is absolute, as logic is the measurement of reasonable

how do you know you cant see with your eyes closed? only know is true, i dont know is a position i know, as i have to see to see that i dont see a dog right now, and i am certain that i am not sense=physical experience commen sense=non sense all the words i know that begin the the word com, are in a mode of seperation lies are complicated by seperation, information is seperation, and true is simple now as one emotion+option=choice actions have consequences intent+action=moral or immoral consequence hmm i have kind of a paradox on my mind. is the action the outcome of the action? i think if i punch you in the face, the punch in the face, is the cause of the effect which is the outcome of the punch
right and wrong is absolute, as logic is the measurement of reasonable

Its called common sense. Most of us have it. You can't read with your eyes closed. Choice is not a option. Action is determined. Factor determining choice is priority. Factor determining priority = morality/benefit/like Good +5 +4 +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 bad Benefit +5 +4 +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 detriment Like +5 +4 +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 dislike. Eg coffee = morality 0 benefit +2 like +5 total +7 Tea = morality 0 benefit +3 like -1 total +2 Determined coffee priority. Eg2 Find wallet return to owner Morality +2 benefit 0 like +2 total +4 Find wallet keep wallet Morality -2 benefit +2 like -1 total -1 Determined return wallet priority Morality determine action. Action not determine morality.
Ban all tobacco products

The banning of Tobacco products should not be approved. Yes, the health of those who have used it will increase, but the safety of others will decrease. If the banning of tobacco products were to happen, that would cause many violent protests to take place, stirring more trouble rather than bringing benefits to society. Yes, tobacco causes pollutants, but it is only a small percentage of tobacco that is polluting our air and causing cancers and other diseases, but the risks of tobacco being the sole cause is very unlikely. The banning of tobacco would cause much trouble within communities, much violence and more uprisings and more illegal activity will be done if the product is banned, due to it's positive contributions to communities, socially and financially, tobacco products should NOT be banned as it has become a main producer of agriculture and a strong foundation in our country.
Ban all tobacco products

Encouraging the use of tobacco products at the expense of someone's health so that "business bolsters" is not fair. The growth of tobacco can be eliminated and other agricultural foods can be produced that can also be good for business. The banning of all tobacco products should be approved and as soon as possible. The health of many people can be saved and deaths due to tobacco illnesses reduced. Agriculture and business can be productive and healthier for the world if tobacco is banned. Stress can be reduced by other things, like massages, exercise, diets, therapy, baths and other things that do not cause illnesses. All tobacco products should be banned.
Ban all tobacco products

People have used tobacco and gotten addicted to it because it relieves the stress from all the pressures of their daily lives. According to cancer.org nearly 16 million people used tobacco products (I.e. cigars, cigarettes, tobacco in pipes) to relieve stress, to take a break from their pressure (http://m.cancer.org...). Think about it, the 16 million people that have purchased these products have caused tobacco businesses to bolster, banning tobacco would cause many tobacco businesses and agriculture that grow tobacco to collapse and be in a huge downfall. Therefore, I believe tobacco products should NOT be banned due to it bringing a huge increase in business, and it helps out the people and their stress level, even if they know what they are doing is wrong.
Ban all tobacco products

At age 18 people do know right from wrong and perhaps know that smoking is "bad" and that they shouldn't do it. Do they still go for that cigarette? YES. They do not understand to what capacity it will harm them. Using tobacco products to relieve stress at such a young age is not the most effective way and definitely not the ONLY way to relieve stress. Just the idea that using tobacco products could kill automatically erases the possibility that it can help someone. Heavy use of government power does not have to b abusive and it doesn't not have to turn to harming people. The goal is to slowly and progressively do away with the products so that there is minimal damage and forceful action. Tobacco products should be banned for the health and people own good.
Ban all tobacco products

Yes, smokers will start smoking around 18, but around that age, people know right from wrong. People start smoking tobacco products around that age because it relieves them of their stress and troubles. Tobacco related illnesses could kill them but who is to say that it will help them? If we were to ban tobacco products, then that is a heavy use if government action, abuse of power and it does no good if people are harmed for being forces to stop smoking "for their own good." (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com...) All in all, all tobacco products should NOT be banned, due to it's substances being stress relievers and banning the product would only be seen as a misuse of government action and abuse of power.
Ban all tobacco products

According to the article found by opening this link, http://www.naag.org......, banning all tobacco products would be beneficial for everyone's health. 1) Nearly all new smokers will start using tobacco before they're 18yrs old and will become addicted before they are mature enough to understand the risks. 2) A significant percentage of those new smokers will die prematurely from tobacco related illnesses. In conclusion, banning all tobacco products will reduce addiction, illnesses and deaths related to these legal but harmful products.
The internet is responsible for the increase in mental health issues in youth.

Mental health issues in children caused by the media are almost impossible to avoid, Due to its extensive rise over time. This can be proven due to the fact that antidepressants being sold have doubled in recent decades, Which validates its effects. Mental health issues recently have become prominent in the media, But not many people are taking initiative to do something about the horrible issue. Approximately 1 in 5 youth aged 13–18 (21. 4%) experiences a severe mental disorder at some point during their life. These statistics are a 37% rise between the years of 1990 and 2010, With depression becoming the fourth highest cause of disability in Australia. Two studies in the United States, The United Kingdom, And Australia have found that rates of antidepressant prescribing have more than doubled in recent decades. At the same time, A worldwide trend of mental disorders displacing musculoskeletal conditions as the predominant reason for illness-related absences and work incapacity has been noted. While these changes in rank represent, To some extent, A reduction in the burden of many somatic illnesses, The expense associated with mental illness has continued to rise, With the annual cost of depression in Australia now estimated to be $12. 6 billion. The alarming statistics, Released recently in a report by Mission Australia, Show almost a quarter of teens surveyed meet the criteria for probable serious mental illness, With girls twice as likely as boys to be affected. "The effects of mental illness at such a young age can be debilitating and incredibly harmful to an individual's quality of life, Academic achievement, And social participation both in the short term and long term. " These effects can not only affect our chances of getting jobs but our future’s quality. A similar study in the United Kingdom showed a dramatic rise in the number of teenagers being admitted to hospital for self-harming in the past decade. Shockingly, The number of teen girls admitted to hospital in the UK harming themselves quadrupled in that period. Another British study shows rates of mental illness in young women aged 16 to 24 is at an all-time high. Is it the pressures of modern day living -- the 'always on' mentality? Is social media to blame?
The internet is responsible for the increase in mental health issues in youth.

The internet such as social media was launch in 2004, The social networking website Facebook rapidly expanded and was used by youths across the world. Messaging sites such as WhatsApp have become the most popular means of communication for younger people, Who spend much of their lives on digital devices. News reports and opinion pieces in newspapers often portray the internet as a danger to the young. Social media is used by in young people from 8 up to 18 years of age. Mental health is something everyone has, Including youths. Mental health problem are issues that affect the way individuals feel, Think or behave. The internet offers tremendous opportunities for social interaction, But constant connection, Superficial exchange and a perpetual quest for "likes" do not nurture deep thinking, Creativity and empathy. Parents should be alert to excessive internet use by a son or daughter, As this could be a sign of distress. A teenager with low self-esteem needs emotional support and won"t necessarily get this from online contacts. There are hints of moral panic in the notion of a mental health epidemic in young people, And the supposed harmfulness of the internet. Reactions to transformative new technology are understandable but often exaggerated. In the 19th century many people were diagnosed with "railway sickness", A type of neurosis attributed to the unnatural motions of train travel. Adolescence has always been a challenging stage of life, But the rising incidence of depression may be due to greater mental health awareness and changes in diagnostic practice. Intensive long-term observation would reveal changing patterns of social media use from childhood to adolescence. Repeated measurement of stress and mental health is crucial, But researchers should not rely on numerical data alone. We suggest integration of quantitative and qualitative methods, With interviews enabling young people to describe their experiences in their own words, Potentially revealing links between social media activity and mental state.
The internet is responsible for the increase in mental health issues in youth.

Adolescence that overuse their devices can eventually destroy physical / personal relationships due to addictive behavior, And ignoring reality. In today’s society, Society is addicted to their phones, Computers, Tablets and other technological devices. We spend too much time on our devices checking social media pages and it can really take a toll not just on ourselves, But the relationships we have. Since there are a growing number of users on social media and most of them are millennials, Can social media affect relationships? ABSOLUTELY. It’s crazy to think that a form of technology could be as addicting, In a sense, As a drug. Spending countless hours refreshing your feed is draining and it literally sucks the life out of you. Hey, I’m not necessarily bashing social media, I think social media could be a great thing, But I think us millennials need to learn how to put our phones down once in a while. By having almost the entire world attached to their phones through social media, It can take a toll on romantic, Personal and professional relationships. The constant need to click refresh allows little time for physical interaction that the world critically needs. We millennials are the future of this country and if we can’t put our phones down for one second to have a normal conversation, Then who knows what’s going to happen to real-life human interaction. Teens shouldn’t be afraid to have a normal conversation with people in person, But they are. Some teens get horrible social anxiety when it comes to speaking out loud, Due to the walls we have put up from the avoidance of interaction because of the increase of social media use. Many people cringe at the thought of communication and human interaction, Which is difficult when many teens are starting to get employed. Is social media to blame for our decline of communication skills? Though, It’s not even just a fear of verbal communication, Many have lost friendships because of social media. Constantly checking Instagram to see what their friends are up to is no way to live. Teens now turn down social interaction events such as parties to stay home in front of screens away from the outside world. If these habits eventually become a social norm them the future of social interactions will soonly disappear.
The internet is responsible for the increase in mental health issues in youth.

Every teenager has times when the mental health is affected, When they feel stressed, Worried, Anxious or down. These are normal if they are short-lived. When they become longer term issues it is a mental health problem and seeking help is the best option. The internet is not the only issue that has been believed to increase the mental health in youth today. There are many things that can cause depression, Stress and anxiety, Such as family issues, Schoolwork, Friendship problems, Your expectations of yourself and others. Family issues is the most common event that is responsible for the mental health in youth. Children can develop large amounts of trauma and disruption in family structures. According to "The Australian Institution Of Family Studies" the effects on families can be significant in youth in mental health. Only 11% of children came from intact families living with biological parents while 89% had disruption in their family structure. Two-third of the children in the study population had been exposed to trauma with physical abuse seen in 36% of cases. Seventy-one percent had reported either a parent or a sibling with a psychiatric disorder. Strong association was found between exposure to trauma and certain diagnoses in respect to hospitalization. ADHD predicted a 4 times likelihood of having more than one previous hospitalization, With mood disorder, Oppositional defiant disorder, And physical abuse increasing the risk by more than twice. Disruption in family structure can lead to several adverse events impacting both the mental health of children. Not all disruptions have equal effects. More emotional and behavioral problems occur in families disrupted by divorce than compared to other types of disruptions, For example, Death of a parent. Certain characteristics have been identified in caregivers as well as the children themselves that serve as risk factors for abuse. Young age, Depression, Substance abuse, Poverty, And history of mothers being separated from their own mothers during childhood serve as risk factors. Schoolwork can also be an issue on youth mental health. Many students can feel stressed when receiving assignments, Studying for tests/exams and given small tasks. It is One study was found that some children who self-reported having 30 minutes or more of homework every night also reported concerning levels of "high stress. " Boys in this study who reported higher levels of stress were more overweight than those who reported lower levels of stress. That stress, Researchers surmise, May be causing hormonal changes that contribute to weight gain. Hormones released when the body is stressed or sleep deprived contribute to weight gain because the body thinks it"s in danger. The internet can be used in many ways and not just be seen in a negative way. The internet can connect people who are dealing with stress and need to speak to someone online, Such as a counselor. There are many supportive kidsline that connect youth to professional counselors, Such as the Kids Helpline. So why should the internet be blamed?
Michigan vs Ohio State is the best rivalry in college football

Thanks for everybody's time and thanks to my opponent for this debate. Now lets get into this round. 1. ) Supporting My Arguments a. Fans As you should know, Auburn is is Alabama. So that means the streets in every town are maroon and white, or blue and orange. If you don't like either team, or take the series lightly or mock it, then you are in trouble. Before every match-up, flags fly, vehicles are decked out in Alabama or Auburn color, and the city is abuzz with football talk. After the game this year (and probably every year) the celebratory, carnival-like atmosphere continued through the night all across the state, and even in rural areas cheering, shouting, and blowing horns peppered the air. The two teams fans feel absolute hatred towards each other. b. Good Rivalry ESPN reported yesterday that the "Iron Bowl wins coaches" poll for college football"s fiercest rivalry. " The history of the Iron Bowl isn"t well-known these days. However, Rolling Stone calls the Iron Bowl "the archetypal rivalry setups in college football, an agricultural institution versus a prestigious university, a farm college versus a society school. " These two schools didn't meet up for 41 years due to a fight. A game played in 1893 was debated for whether it should count for the 1892-93 season or the 1893-94 season. The teams didn't start playing each other until the presidents of both schools "made up", it also took the STATE GOVERNMENT! Also almost all the games played are pretty darn close. Maybe a few blow outs here and there, but other than that it is close every year. c. Nasty From the Start Auburn and Alabama first met on Feb. 22, 1893, in Birmingham, Alabama. Auburn won 32-22. That much could be agreed upon. But the schools ended up getting into a spat"the first of many to come"over whether the game should be counted toward the 1892 season or the 1893 season. The nastiness continued from there, eventually leading to the temporary suspension in the series after the schools" 1907 meeting, which ended in a 6-6 tie. Auburn and Alabama didn"t meet again until 1948.
Michigan vs Ohio State is the best rivalry in college football

1) Number of games played"If they did play in those years, add 41 more games to the number right now and that would be 120 which is 9 games more than the Michigan-Ohio State rivalry"But they didnt, so you cant count them as if they actually were played.... Michigan-Ohio State have played substantially more games than Alabama-Auburn over roughly the same time span, which means that the Michigan-Ohio State rivalry is better than the Alabama-Auburn rivalry since Michigan and Ohio State have played against each other more often, and by a hefty amount as well.2) Skill of both programs "what does Heisman Trophy winners have to do with how good rivalries are?"It is one of many idifferent measurements I used to show that players from Michigan and Ohio State have overall been better than players from Alabama and Auburn, meaning that the Michigan-Ohio State rivalry is better than the Alabama-Auburn rivalry since there is a higher level of play between Michigan and Ohio State athletes than Alabama and Auburn"he ran out of evidence to support his claim"It was all I needed to prove that im right and youre wrong. In your round 2 alone you provided no new evidence to support your side of the argument as well and instead went on the defensive. 3) Wikipedia"my opponent used Wikipedia as a resource"Wikipedia is very reliable as a resource when it comes to listing simple statistics. Its only when you get into very complicated concepts of philosophy and psychology where wikipedia becomes horribly unreliable. http://www.debate.org...All claims that I have made so far can be also substantiated through sources other than wikipedia as well, meaning all of my statistics are valid:http://buckeyefansonly.com...http://bentley.umich.edu...http://www.mgoblue.com...http://www.sports-reference.com...http://www.sports-reference.com...http://www.maizenbrew.com...Not only that, you've only used one source in the entire debate, whereas I've used about a dozen prior to this around alone. Conclusion:Michigan-Ohio State is a better rivalry than Alabama-Auburn because 1 - Michigan and Ohio State have overall had better players than Alabama and Auburn,2 - Michigan and Ohio State have won their conference and the national title more often than Alabama and Auburn,3 - Michigan and Ohio State both have higher win ratios and a higher number of wins overall than both Alabama and Auburn,4 - Michigan and Ohio State have met for more often than Alabama and Auburn have over the same time periodVote Pro
Michigan vs Ohio State is the best rivalry in college football

First Argument: The reason that they have only played 79 times is because the Auburn president Dr. Ralph B. Draughon and Alabama president Dr. John Gallalee decided to start resuming play after 41 years of not playing each other! 41 years! If they did play in those years, add 41 more games to the number right now and that would be 120 which is 9 games more than the Michigan-Ohio State rivalry. Which means that it has lasted longer. Second Arguments (Attacking Opponents Arguments): First, I would like to ask, what does Heisman Trophy winners have to do with how good rivalries are? It doesn't. Next, I would like to point out that opponent basically ran the same arguments. That proves that he ran out of evidence to support his claim Last, my opponent used Wikipedia as a resource. Wikipedia is a site where anyone can change anything. ALL of his arguments used Wiki. That's not a valid source. So if it's not a valid source, then it is not valid evidence.