Nurture versus Nature (BOP is equally shared)

WAIT A SECONDThe resolution clearly states nurture versus nature, you have to be in favour of nature not simply an advocate of equality! this is why I said equally shared BOP, I never in anyway stated that this meant you had BOP to prove the equal significance of both, instead if meant you equally have to prove nature's significance as I have to prove nurture's.If my opponent wishes to continue advocating equality I think he should definitely lose the conduct vote.Now I shall write an 'essay' styled debate (I've notice the 'bullet point+explanation style' of debating is most popular on DDO but I personally think an essay style is far more relevant to a nature and nurture conflict as all contentions are interlinked).I am a relatively rational person (or so I like to think) I love music, hate sports am neither religious nor atheist (I am a devout agnostic, although I have inclinations to render fate as making more sense than chaos theory) I am heterosexually attracted to females, with a preference for those of the South American race (often termed 'Latino') and my favourite subject to study is philosophy, shortly followed by psychology and I hate bullies a lot. My political outlook is largely liberal, however I would like a huge revolt and oppression to oppression itself for I have a rather hypocritical ideal that if we oppress the oppressors, true peace and freedom will eventually come. I am largely described as a weird, funny, witty and clumsy individual and I myself see myself as a slow but logical person whose talent is rather underappreciated under the rigid and oppressive education system currently in place (although admittedly far less oppressive than previous ones) for I believe my true talent lies in original thinking in the field of philosophy (which unfortunately isn't taught until university for almost all schools I know of, and the one which I attend).So why did I just blab about a lot of what makes me who I am? Why did I reveal random parts of my personal views and a little of my personality? Was it simply to bore you and enlarge my ego with knowing that you envy me (when you probably laugh at how arrogant I appear)? The reason is that I want to now explain why every single attribute I just mentioned is due, significantly (and in some cases solely) on combinations of environmental factors and others who I've grown up knowing and who treated me in whatever way they did at whatever stage in my development as a person (namely childhood and adolescence) I shall then briefly explain why even Hitler, Stalin and Saddam Hussein are not born evil nor terrorists, but simply were inevitably forced to become so by whatever experiences they had in life, and whatever reactions they gave at the time, which ironically are also due to past environmental factors causing their reaction to be so in the first place.My environment has shaped me, I have no doubt about that. I grew up a very international life, spending two years in USA, four in UAE, one in Kenya and the rest in UK. There is no doubt in my mind that if I had grown up in the same house all my life I would most certainly have a very blinkered view on the world, if not on every aspect of opinionation. I could easily have been raised by an extremist family (of any religion) and become a fundamentalist of that religion, listen to no music (as some Muslims believe it's satanic), eat no meat or fish, eat no pork, fast for Ramadan and eat only Halal meat... you get the idea. I'm also quite sure if my parents had been very strict on me as a toddler (as in slap me every time I did a thing 'unholy' and things like that) and had brainwashed me from a very early age, my resistance to other belief systems would be extremely high, this is also hugely relevant as to why atheists don't understand the religious and vice versa, atheists were raised by parents who valued subjects such as mathematics, science (including all subgenres of it), philosophy and geography over all other subjects and never raised their children to think in one way (or merely raised them to think like an atheist, this is also possible). On the other hand, heavily religious parents raise their child to believe in a religion (which is set to dominate any scientific or mathematical reasoning whatsoever, and if the science or maths causes confusion, the religious outlok should be the one to take) and hence lead you to believe in this.My point is also related sexually. It is commonly believed, in this day and age, that sexuality is something you are born with, but I am going to be anti-norm in saying that it's not. It is not something you are born with, but it is also not a choice and this is where both the religious and anti-theists go wrong. A baby is asexual, it has no sexual preference. A human baby growing amongst wolves would naturally become sexually attracte to wolves, the sexual drive they had would relate to the one of their peers and/or idols (hence children often imitate others, if you swear they swear, if you like girls, they like girls unless you immediately tell them it's wrong or 'incorrect' to think or act this way). If you told the 2 year old me that rape is correct and consensual sex is boring and dull, I would probably grow to believe this espeically if I respected you as an idol or a parent. Despite children's natural rebelliousness, they actually value the words of their guardians over any of their peers (this almost completely turns the other way in adolescence, which is when environment is VERY influential on how you turn otu as an adult) this is psychologically valid and is very obvious when you see a child acting out or repeating exactly the same things in the same way as their parents.If I then entered my pre-teen years with violent idols, with 18 year olds who beat me up and bullied me, I wold naturally grow to bully preteens at age 18 also (unless I moved to a society where this was regarded immoral and disgusting to do, although secretly I'd hate the injustice that I was abused at 12 and the new generation of 12 year olds I am with I am unable to abuse at the same age as my abusers). It is a well known fact that all large scale criminals (with only one or two exceptions per million) had abusive or rough upbringings. When I speak of large-scale criminals I am referring to ones who do crimes such as serial murder, serial robberies, grand thefts, assination work(although in some states this becomes legal depending on who you are assinating for, for example the CIA assassin would be seen as legal whilst the Mafia's assassin would not).If I grew up amongst black people, which I didn't, I probably would find black girls hotter than Latinos. However I grew up with a very exotic set of family and friends, I grew up with a Sri Lankan father and a Danish mother so I guess I found an intermediate skin tone and stuff. Besides, I've grow up in a world where Latinos are reportedly the hottest race.