Libertarians have it right on health care-not Barack, Hillary or Johnny.

-Poor's health care I'm saying that private schools have to compete and do better than public schools, generally. If health care remained private while giving tax breaks to all, and continuing health care for the poorest Americans, then it would great. Health care should be private. Piblic things do not work. Our public school system is failing. A public health system will fail like in Switzerland, Canada, and France. A private system will work and will be better when it is paid for you. In Switzerland, there are huge waiting lists that delay surgery for often more than 6 months, putting people through excrutiating pain for months and often kills people. The taxes are also way higher and they increase exponentially just to keep up with adequate health care costs and they still dont have as good equipment as we do here in the states. Why would you reduce American health care to this? -Regulations They force doctors to pay high malpractice insurance rates in Chicago. The doctors there walked out for a whole day. Less people go to medical school there now or they move out of Chicago. And doctors have less quality equipment because of the high price. Legislators dont understand the medical profession and arent effected by how they effect it. This is your example! -FDA + The Historic Free Market - Historically, when a company is unregulated, it serves it's own interests, not the interests of the consumer. + This is not true. Look at private schools, fast food, cars. Imagine if one gas company decided to charge $7 a gallon right now. They'd be out of business the next morning. With all the companies at $4 they have to keep competitive rates. The FDA currently takes on average 8 years to test a drug while patients die and go through excruciating pain. If the free market did it, there would be lower rates and theyd do a better and quicker job, saving lives. And yes. I've heard of "The Jungle." - Sweden Sweden has huge waiting lists that let people die and go in excruciating pain for months. And they have huge taxes. A 100% tax break for health care solves this problem. And I don't know why Sweden has higher life expectancy. But are you willing to allow people to die on waiting lists? Suffer with pain on waiting lists? And have WAY HIGHER taxes? -And I'd like to refute one of your points. You talk about people dying waiting in line. But who's to say that these lines won't exist under your system? + The reason they have waiting lists is because there are fewer doctors because there are fewer available. There are fewer health care systems, therefore there are fewer doctors. When there are tax breaks, there are an infinite number if health care systems and therefore doctors and other resources. Under your system there are fewer doctors because there are fewer companies so the only solution is waiting lists, which the rich and famous can jump in front of. And that allow people to die and go into excruciating pain. My plan does not include evil waiting lists or a lack of resources. Ok. Now, that I've responded to all of your points, I will restate my own: Your plan allows all Americans to have health care but causes waiting lists, a lack of resources, less doctors, higher taxes, and more deaths from the inefficient FDA. My plan will give every American health care, will allow us to keep 100% of our resources and possibly encourage more doctors and resources, taxes will be lowered, never highered for health care, and the FDA will cease to exist as an inefficient group but free market alternatives will do a better job on testing drugs, like our private schools do best. There is absolutely NO REASON to let the government raise your taxes for health care when they canbe lowered for the same thing. And there are so many reasons not to have government in health care with higher taxes. Why not vote PRO? Thank you. Please vote with logical side: PRO.