Resolved: The Christian god most likely doesn't exist.

Who is the god of the Bible? The god that the christian bible speaks of is an All-powerful, All-Knowing, and All-Loving god (I doubt my opponnet will object to this). However, in my next few contentions I will state how this being can not possibly exist. Contention1: Problem of EvilP1: If an all-powerful and perfectly good god exists, then evil does not. P2:There is evil in the world we live in. C: Therefore, an all-powerful and perfectly good god does not exist. P1: It says many times in the Bible that god is all-loving and all powerful [1]. So, then if he were to be all powerful and all loving then evil could not exist. A god that is all loving and good would use his power to end suffering in the world he created. However, we instead see horrible things like war, famine, and diseases. P2: This is an undeniable fact. C: Since so much suffering in the world exists and god hasn't done anything yet, then this all-loving god can not exist. Contention 2: Biblical ContadictionsP1: If the god of the Bible is to exist, then the Bible can't contain errors. P2: The Bible contains errors. C: Therefore, the god of the bible can't exist. P1: The root of all things that describe the biblical god is the Bible itself. If the book is flawed then this means the god it speaks of more then likely doesn't exist. I will now show a few examples of the errors that are found in the Bible. E1: Matthew 19:26 states:“But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible. “ while Judges 1:19 says: “And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron. ” <--- It is clear that the god of the Bible can either be all powerful all the time or never to begin with. The Bible has stated one thing about this god while saying the exact opposite at another. E2: 2 Samuel 6:23 says:“Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death” While later on in this very same book at 2 Samuel 21:8 it says: “But the king took…the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul” <--- Another error in the Bible. It can't get it's facts straight. E3: James 1:13 says: “. .for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man. ” while Genesis 22:1 says: “And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham…” <--- Another contradiction in the Bible's describtion of its god. These should suffice for now. I will state more in the later rounds since this is going to be a somewhat long debate anyway. Contention 3: Science proves Bible wrongIn the major advances of science their have been descoveries that have proven that there is no real need for a god in the cause of the world. And furthermore the Bible directly contradicts science in areas such as "Noah's Flood", and as I stated earlier if the Bible is proven wrong then the god it describes is also more then likely to be false too. Noah's Flood has been proven to never have happened. The father of modern geology Charles Lylle stated in his book "The Geological Evidences for the Antiquity of Man": “Had the waters once risen, even for a day, so high as to reach the level of the base of one of these cones-had there been a single flood fifty or sixty feet in height since the last eruption occurred- a great part of the volcanoes must have inevitably been swept away”He noted that the extinct volcanoes of France were as a result of being extinct for a long time (longer then the flood), the volcanoes were made up of loose ashes. So if a global flood would have occurred. Then the volcanoes wouldn't have existed at the time the famed geologist was absurving them. Another piece of evidence from a little bit more modern geologist who is a Professor of Geology at the University of Melbourne, Ian Plimer. He stated severial points in his book, "Telling Lies for God: Reason versus Creationism". I will state only one. It concerns the sequence of the development of sedimentary rock. The two kinds of sediments are high energy and low energy sediment. Based on simple laboratory tests and field observations of actual floods, it can be shown that high energy sediments, such as gravel, are deposited during the height of floods. Low energy sediments, such as siltstone, mudstone and claystone, are deposited during the waning of the floods. Thus if there is a worldwide flood we would expect that there would be a uniform worldwide sedimentary formation with the high energy sediments (ancient gravel, sands) at the bottom and the low energy sediments at the top. Yet this is not seen on anything close to a global scale. As Professor Plimer pointed out, if this is to be seen on a global scale, oilfield geologists would have an easy job since all sedimentary formation would invariably have sandstone at the bottom and siltstones, mudstones and claystones at the top. (I will add more scientific evidence against the Bible and its god later on in the debate)I will await my opponnet's response. Thank You for reading. ~~Sources~~1. Holy Bible (KJV)2. Howell-Smith, In Search of the Real Bible: p473. Plimer, Telling Lies for God: p75