We shall abolish Social Security and replace it with R.E.I.A.G

Solutions for Immigration given by the Con,1) Take accounts of dead people and give them to immigrants2) Create another underfunded program to try to deal with immigrants....There are a lot of issues with Number 1, the biggest issue being that the accounts of those dead people cannot simply be confiscated by the government because those accounts belong to the family of the dead person. Since those accounts cant just be confiscated that leaves over 1 million immigrants every year being denied access to this "genius" program. 1 million immigrants over 42 years will lead to 50 million people living without any financial stability (assuming that immigration creeps upwards like it has done every year). The Pro then only offers 'another program" to take care of this but what kind of bullsh*t idea is that. Is this program going to be like social security for the immigrants or just a tax cut or what? who runs it, can all of them apply, what are the benefits, the Pro leaves ALL these important details out of it....Now take into account this new probably overblown program for immigrants, add this new plan the Pro wants to implement, and on top of that add social security since thats going to be around for another 60 years at least, and this is going to be a large burden on the budget for a long time too....FundingThe Pro dismisses this entire argument by saying "oh its just another 50 billion dollars a year, thats nothing to the government, we can just borrow some more or raise taxes or make cuts to some programs like the military"All of those options would trigger massive lobbying in the government as all sides create a gridlock over where all this funding would come from (taxes, borrowing, cutting programs) all of which would trigger a huge gridlock over a single program while other issues would have to take a back seat until this ordeal is sorted out, IF it gets sorted out. Who controls the investmentsThe Pro says that the Federal Reserve will control massive hedge funds to decide where all this funding goes to. Keep in mind though that the Federal Reserve aka the FED is argued to be unconstitutional, corrupt, and half the presidential candidates want to end the FED. So at this point the Pro wants this entire billion dollar program to be controlled by an organization that is arguably corrupt, unconstitutional, and might not even be around in 10 years depending on who become president....Now look at the "strategy" that the Pro wants to put all of this money into," 10% max for stock investment in car industry"...................... That 4 years ago swallowed up government bailouts almost recklessly"10% max for stock investment in food industry"...................... Which the government subsidizes half ofother 80% is not defined...................... Not a good quality of a genius planResponse to poor investments by the government" but a 200 million dollar loss to the Government investment accounts who are making 5.5 BILLION dollars(54 billion*.097) a year is of no real consequence"Wo now the Pro believes that the government should not have to consider safe investments at all since there will always be money to be made elsewhere...... You know who else had that strategy? Millionaires who lost everything in the great depression when everything was lost. " hedge funds have people perfectly capable of choosing good stocks"But those hedge funds are being controlled by an organization questioned for being corrupt and unconstitutional.... That could surely compromise the safety of these investments. "if everything goes the hell(and it hasn’t since the 200 years we started stocks)...... "Great Depression2008 depression1976 recession"then you will also be saying goodbye to Social Security and every other program America has to offer."And this is positive because?Population fluctuations of 18 years oldsPro showed how if another baby boom took place the funding needed for his program would go from 54 billion to 68 billion, but the Pro just assumes that the government will see this coming and prepare for it, btu there is no evidence they will. When Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security were established nobody even noticed that the baby boom generation was approaching and the bill flew through congressional approval and is now ravaging the national budget. Expiring after 13 yearsPro just claims that the programs would not expire since these benefits generate interest, but these accounts dont come from banks or organizations that give interest to attract customers they come from the government. The government doesnt have to give interest rates to people and they probably wont since interest rates come out of pocket from the bank, or in this case the government. What his means is that we either have a program that expires after 13 years or a program that costs the government even more money as people live longer and live off of interest...Dumping billions into the stock market"We are not adding money to the stock market"Here is how investing in the stock market works, http://www.tradestocksamerica.com...^ buying stocks channels money from investors into the companies they are investing inhttp://studenomics.com...^ When you decide to buy shares in a company you’re buying a piece of that company. http://studenomics.com...^ Buying stocks is interchangeable with buying shares.http://www.abcstockinvesting.com...^It's really just like any other marketplace - it facilitates the exchange of goods between interested parties and works to reduce distribution costs and set pricesWe are indeed putting money into the stock market.... ALL OF ITHere are the flaws in this "genius" plan1) It completely leaves immigrants out of luck and depending on other programs that does not specify what benefits the immigrants will get, if any.2) The way this program is funded is not specified and is left open to discussion, but like most things left open to discussion in politics it will become grid locked and the program might not even pass or be shut down3) The ones controlling this massive program is an organization accused of being corrupt, illegal, unconstitutional, and might even be ended in 10 years4) The plan does not specify how the program will be invested, it only states that it will be distributed into different industries, and the two the Pro named are ones that were on the verge of collapse 4 years ago and one that is heavily subsidized by the government themselves. 5) The plan does not have guidelines for how to avoid poor investments, in fact the plan doesnt even warn against it since the Pro says that what is lost in one place can be made up somewhere else. 6) The plan does not prepare for possible fluctuations in the number of people who would enter the program in any particular year7) The plan would run out after 13 years since contrary to the pro's claim these accounts would not be paying out interest, and if they were then that would cost a hell of a lot more money to fund8) The plan would be putting all of our futures recklessly into the stock market which has come close to collapsing many times and can be unhinged by any event.9) This Program will cost a lot of money in addition to Social Security which will still be around for another 40 YEARS