Philippines should run under One ruler

A. "You didnt answer my question, would you protect this kind of people?" You said that the ruler should kill whoever that disobeys the law. The ruler decides the law without needing to listen to the citizens. Therefore, the ruler can decide that anyone who wears pink should die. This law is obviously ridiculous. So these people should be protected. B: "In the first place, why are we referring to the single ruler as a demonic kind of man. Remember, not all ruler think alike." Not all people agree with the ruler either. This means that the ruler may decide something while the majority is against it. Not all rulers think alike, not all citizens think alike either. C: "Please do read your history, Adolf hitler didnt intend to hate the races that you have mentioned, hate is an emotion, and as such cannot be completely explained and doesn"t follow the rules of logic." "The Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. "Holocaust" is a word of Greek origin meaning "sacrifice by fire." The Nazis, who came to power in Germany in January 1933, believed that Germans were "racially superior" and that the Jews, deemed "inferior," were an alien threat to the so-called German racial community. In the early years of the Nazi regime, the National Socialist government established concentration camps to detain real and imagined political and ideological opponents. Increasingly in the years before the outbreak of war, SS and police officials incarcerated Jews, Roma, and other victims of ethnic and racial HATRED in these camps."[1] D: "It is not contradictory because I didnt state such thing. You are not obviously reading my argument here, I said that Adolf did this and did that (killing weak people), I am not saying that this will now be the image of Single ruler. Which i stated will only kill unlawful citizens. Are you getting the point or do i have to spell it out?" 1st. He did not kill weak people (as I stated before), he killed people of specific races/religion. [1] 2nd. You DID state such thing. "Hitler proposes to conquer other countries, hence, creating superhumans, hence, killing millions of people (eliminating weak people). ... i DON'T CARE about the killings, as long as they kill the squatters, rapists, murderers and any person that doesnt obey the rules. " E: "...didnt you read my last statement (("You wouldnt have to worry about the amount of embezzled money if you only have one leader, instead of having so many sharks in the bay.")). Hence, less official operating a country, means less money they will take. What more if we only have one ruler, right?" "Less official operating the country" Do you mean the country should have less OFFICIALS? 1st. Each official only works for small portions of the nation, and not all will be corrupt. 2nd. The ruler has complete control on the nation, and him/her being corrupt means that the whole country will fall in victim. Conclusion: Pro dropped many of my arguments (lives, what happened in Germany, etc.) and instead refuted it with "The people killed are doing illegal things" while ignoring the fact that the ruler is the one who chooses what is legal and illegal. Plus, Pro stated that any unlawful citizen should be killed (remember, the ruler decides what is lawful and what is not) , even though it is ridiculous to kill people just because: They are in a specific race/religion They speeded on a highway etc. [1]http://www.ushmm.org...