Marxism is invariably superior to Capitalism

Well my first issue must be with your choice of words in saying "violently usurp the means of production from its " rightful owners"". I would ask how the capitalist class has more "right" to the means of production than the bourgeois or proletarian classes? Did they not themselves have a violent revolution to seize them off the aristocracy in the overthrow of feudalism? Is this "immoral theft". I would be very interested to know what right you think the few have over the many to own all of the useful items in society without even using them themselves. Your first point in favour of capitalism is, in my view, deeply flawed. Capitalism does not respect anyone's property; the very most essential items that every person needs are perpetually at stake. The threat of competition means that the market can seize your home, your food, and the clothes on your back, all in the name of liberty via free market. Communism views the work of the people as their own to give; it does not even force you to work. In fact, it advocates the freedom offered by choosing not to work. It simply says that if you choose not to work then you must provide for yourself. Therefore, it does not view the people's labour as public property. The final line in your first argument is ludicrous and hypocritical. As Marx points out in painstaking detail, capitalism causes alienation of the labourer, as in, alienation of the labourer from the products, alienation of the labourer from labouring, alienation of the labourer from other labourers and alienation of the labourer from gattungswesen, or "spirit essence". If you cannot understand that capitalism causes such alienation, and that the first and second types especially were in contradiction to your idea of " rights over what they produce", then I believe you simply can't comprehend what a right is. The only people with rights over production are those making surplus from it; the capitalists. As to your second argument; can you then explain why there have been functioning communist societies found in pre-feudal and tribal communities for centuries? And can you explain away the theory of Mutual Aid and how it eclipses competition? (1). Also, in capitalism people don't keep what they earn-they are given useless trinkets and taught that they have value due to commodity fetishism, which is an ideology bred of capitalism. Also, one must consider that there are more incentives then material ones. Emotional incentives can be far more potent. Many people will work to be viewed in a certain way, provided they have a good standard of necessity materials. If you don't believe this then please explain Alexey Grigoryevich Stakhanov and the many others like him.(2). As yet, you have failed to find a communist flaw that is either true or exclusive from capitalism. Your arguments in favour of capitalism have also appeared somewhat contradictory to fact. I hope you further enlighten me in your next round; I'm sure this is simply me misinterpreting your points. (1) See: Mutual Aid, A Factor of Evolution (2) https://www.google.co.uk... And of course, once again, the main arguments are from The Principles of Communism The Communist Manifesto Das Kapital