Kidnappers should be made to face capital punishment

I will start by definition of terms which will aid me into my argument. kid""nap- /"0"4kid"0"5nap/ verb 1. take (someone) away illegally by force, typically to obtain a ransom. noun 1. the action of kidnapping someone. Kidnapping - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In criminal law,kidnappingis the taking away or transportation of a person against that person's will.. The crime of unlawfully seizing and carrying away a person by force or Fraud, or seizing and detaining.legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary....en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Kidnapping. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS TO EXECUTE ONE TO COMMITTED CRIME THAT IS LEGALLY WRONG AND FOUND WANTING IN THE SOCIETY. REASONS WHY KIDNAPPERS SHOULD FACE DEATH PENALTY 1.KIDNAPPERS TORTURE THEIR VICTIMS. Kidnappers should face death penalty because of some inhumane treatment which they impose on their victims. Many of this victims will even be starved without eating and yet they demand for money or ransom sometimes, they kidnap for killing purpose. Now tell me, will you allow someone who killed your brother to be alive and enjoying his daily meal? 2.SELFISHNESS. Kidnappers are selfish thats why they actually kidnapp people either to pay them ransom or they do it for someone who want's to kill the deceased or their victim. So since kidnappers sometimes kill their victims, why won't they be killed if caught? My argument is based on this platform, a tooth should go for a tooth. This kidnappers can engage in other things that will even help the country's g.d.p gross domestic product instead of been security challenge. Now I read article of kidnapping in a state called Nigeria, it went thus: AS cases of kidnapping for ransom continue to spread across the country, the governors of the 36 states of the federation, on Monday, called on the Federal Government to bring the full weight of the law on culprits. The governors, who met at the Kwara State Liaisons office in Abuja, said the time had come for the federal authorities to act decisively on the criminality in order to restore sanity and general security. In a communiqu"" issued at the end of the meeting held under the auspices of Nigerian Governors"" Forum, a copy of which was sent by email to the Nigerian Tribune in Lagos, the leaders commended the government on the successful conclusion of the amnesty to militants in the Niger Delta. Accordingly, they promised their support for all necessary measures aimed at consolidating the gains of the exercise, but urged the Federal Government to mete out appropriate punishments to kidnappers henceforth. The governors noted that they decided to take a firm stand on the trend (kidnapping) after listening to the submissions of governors from the South-South zone on the amnesty deal between the Federal Government and the militants. Some Houses of Assembly in states in the zone had passed laws, spelling out tough punitive measures, including treating kidnappers as hardened criminals deserving death sentence. Now the most annoying part is this, the government has provided amnesty and yet due to their selfish interest, they decided to be against the law and be treat to national security so why not face capital punishment? Don't you know that if atleast 5kidnappers are to be killed publicly, that others might learn a lesson? Ladies and gentlemen, kidnappers should face capital punishment. I Will due my rebuttals and more reasons in my next outing. Note: ignore my grammer, am using phone.