I Will Not Contradict Myself

==Rules==His answers are all misleading and confusing.Furthermore, the second case where I ask "Is the Earth a sad place right now?" and he responds "In many ways, yes. In others, no," is the primary violation. Even though he stated that neither answer was fully correct, he doesn't provide a justficiation or reason.The judges can review over the other violations, if they wish to.==Contradictions==1. Bush and ImmigrationWhen I stated that I never mentioned the DREAM act, I was referring to my question, which was about whether or not we should increase border security. The only reason why we are arguing over the DREAM act is because my opponent brought the issue up in his answer to my question.The inital question never asked about the DREAM act. It only asked whether or not Pro supported border security improvement, and to which he never gave a direct answer (not sure what he means) but stated a bunch of random topics relating to immigration.Also, the fundamental problem is that you support increasing border security, just like GWB.2. Religious Ideals vs. AbortionI drop this. My opponent is too demanding/specific, XD.3. Obama and Gun Bans Obama said "I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manfuacturer’s lobby." [1]... That seems to imply gun bans.Also, my opponent concedes that Obama supports local gun bans, which are still gun bans. He supports Obama, but opposes any gun bans.4. Drug LegalizationMy opponent admits that he doesn't support Obama on this issue...All of this almost leads me to believe that my opponent was lying about supporting Obama at all, lol.It still seems like a contradiction to me. Pro supports Obama and supports drug legalization. Obama doesn't want drug legalization...5. Bush and the Death PenaltyNow my opponent is being very specific.He is ignoring the fact that in a much more broader perspective, both my opponent and GWB want capital punishment to continue to be used, eventhough Pro doesn't support GWB at all. That is indisputable. 6. China and the USMy opponent pratically contradicted himself, when he was attempting to defend himself.He earlier stated that the US and China are hostile towards each other. He just stated that the US and China are NOT hostile towards each other.The fact that he admitted earlier that they were hostile, fits the definition of an "enemy".Hence, according to Pro, China is an enemy, but he answered the question "Is China an enemy" with a No.7. Inanimate Life and the EarthThe definition my opponent provided is still a contradiction.He says that Earth is the PLANET that we live on. Planets are inanimate - it is the life that lives on there that is animate. Pro says that the PLANET can be sad, but says that inanimate objects cannot have emotions.8. Aid and Focusing on our HomeFocusing on our home = US is the top priority.Sending aid = US is not the top priority.When we start to send aid, it implies that the government has other interests that what is occuring at home.My opponent supports aid, but whats the government to focus on home. ====Thanks for the debate, Contra. :)==Source==[1] http://www.ontheissues.org...