Anarchy is the true means of liberty

Yes this ideology is very beautiful and inspirational When you mention the anarchists blogs where they say you'll get 10 different answers, that is true in some respects. When Anarchy is formed, there will not be a singular Anarchic ideology that is followed exactly as it is in theory. It will most likely be a mix of different elements of the Anarchic schools of thought. I am representing the most basic Anarchist beliefs in how a state should be run. All of them, no matter what kind of Anarchic ideology they follow, want the abolition of Capitalism and Government and want everyone to live in equality. There are of course differences, but they are mostly not as significant as the basics of what most Anarchists want. Green Anarchy shares a preference for for a "noble savage" type of living, living among nature and animals but in equality with the people and the abolition of Capitalism and Government. http://www.anarchism.net... There's Anarcho-Communism, and Mutualist Anarchy which have differences according the way goods are spread But of course these aren't huge differences. The only thing that you have to remember is that "Anarcho-Capitalism" is definitely not Anarchy as it completely clashes with the meaning of Anarchy. Most Anarchists agree with this "1- you want to be well and healthy; Yes, but not always achievable, no matter how much I want it, or how much others want to help me. True. But also everyone wants to be well in according to mind and spirit 2- you want to be free; Impossible to achieve, even if we didn't have rules, we still have to play by the laws of nature. There are restrictions all over us, even our body is one of it. You get paralyzed, and you will be in whatever spot one will like you to be. You are healthy, your body still have limits. If there are limits, you can't ever be truly free. We are only discussing the most freedom that people can achieve within the limits of nature. Obviously we still have to play by the laws of nature, but that isn't the point. 3- to serve no master; In anarchy, you would have a master, the master would be all of us. You would serve every master, and every master would serve you. The point is not to serve a "single" master 4- to crawl and humiliate yourself before no man; Agreed, but anarchy cannot guarantee such. Not guaranteed, but most likely. Nothing is ever guaranteed in anything 5- you want to have well-being for yourself, your family, and those near and dear to you. And not to be harassed and worried by the fear of to-morrow; Agreed. :) 6- you want health, liberty, and well-being. Every one is like yourself in this respect; Agreed, but again, one not achievable, and the other cannot be guaranteed. Liberty, health and liberty is definitely achievable but obviously nothing is guaranteed. These things are much more likely in an Anarchy than the current system I am glad that you are up to try it. Anarchy is a beautiful thing and a way that people can join together without oppression and competition, without authority and without prison. Without hate, without war, without property and wage slaves. Without prejudice or discrimination. With freedom and expression. With art and passion. With love and equality. With daughters and fathers mothers and sons, lovers and friends, brothers and sisters, hand in hand. With people black, white, gay, transexual, young, old, all living together in harmony. It won't be immediate this unity, but through work and determination it can definitely be achieved because everyone, no matter who, wants this. "Pretty much the entire globe has being claimed, population is to massive, and anarchist are spread out to different regions and countries. Let's say part of the country wants to form a state, they need land to do so, and this land must be detached from government power. The way I see, every citizen has the right of part of the land (in case a few weren't happy and would want their own state, and want to brake from the condition of the country they are currently in). Because of the population is massive everywhere, how could one possibly decide what size of land does this group has the right to it? Pretty much every minute there is someone somewhere being born, dying or become of age that would give them the right to decide and take responsibilities for the regime. These people would pick a size of land they want and live under it. It'll start out as a small land where there is a small population. Then it can slowly grow bigger if more people want to live under this land. I'm a little confused at your question. I don't really know how to answer this So how does one begin such of state of anarchy with such conditions? If you want to achieve what you desire, a war wouldn't be a good idea, war traumatized people, I doubt they would have much freedom with such of images on their head.The way to achieve Anarchy would be a tough thing to figure out. There are definitely many options. It could be started out with the spreading of the land. Or of course a revolution. The type of revolution, I'm not sure how it would be done. It's a complex issue. Some Anarchists are pacifists while other Anarchists believe that violence should be used to achieve goals. So it really depends. You provide a list of a few communities, but you did not list anything about them. I read a bit on each, and I cannot see why you feel those are good examples. Do you think any of them accomplish anything (or are in the path) to achieve what you state on your resolution, (If so, please point to me how is that so)?"These communities that I mentioned are Anarchist regimes that are living the way that most Anarchists advocate. They are self-sufficient, independent from the government, and live in equality. I feel that these communities are definitely on the path to liberation, as they coexist in peace without the government constantly examining them, questioning them, oppressing them, discriminating them, manipulating them, enslaving them, robbing them, stalking them, killing them, deluding them and imprisioning them.The flaws that Anarchy has can be fixed or figured out in time. Everyone in the community is going to figure out what they want to do and will share ideas. The inconveniences in Anarchy are completely minor compared to the disgraces that the Government and Capitalism have to offer.“Poor human nature, what horrible crimes have been committed in thy name! Every fool, from king to policeman, from the flatheaded parson to the visionless dabbler in science, presumes to speak authoritatively of human nature. The greater the mental charlatan, the more definite his insistence on the wickedness and weaknesses of human nature. Yet, how can any one speak of it today, with every soul in a prison, with every heart fettered, wounded, and maimed?......Anarchism, then, really stands for the liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from the shackles and restraint of government. Anarchism stands for a social order based on the free grouping of individuals for the purpose of producing real social wealth; an order that will guarantee to every human being free access to the earth and full enjoyment of the necessities of life, according to individual desires, tastes, and inclinations.This is not a wild fancy or an aberration of the mind. It is the conclusion arrived at by hosts of intellectual men and women the world over; a conclusion resulting from the close and studious observation of the tendencies of modern society: individual liberty and economic equality, the twin forces for the birth of what is fine and true in man.” ― Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays