The Liberal/progressive Democrat's are anti-woman!

My opponent has not been paying attention to those who speak for his political party, so I will do my best to bring him up to date concerning the smear tactics and blatent double standard used by the liberal Democrats. In my opponent's rebuttal, he cliams that I am using nothing more than pretentious Rhetoric and that this, "Tactic" dissuades, "many people" from adopting the conservative position. Not only is this statement utterly absurd on its surface, it ignores the fact that party affiliatian in American politics is the result of idealology and not whether one, or the other is insulted by the opposing political party's use of words in defining the other party's position. I ask that my opponent back up this statement with fact and statistic. The mere fact that my opponent says this soes not make it true, "necessities probandi incumbit ei qui agit"! The facts are: 1) Harry reid called Sarah Palin, "Shrill and Sarcastic". Sarah Palin used no more, or no less emotion than she felt was needed to make her point. I doubt that many would confuse her passion with being shrill. Has my opponent ever heard the word, "Shrill" used to describe Obama, or any other male politician? Sarah Palin my have used some political sarcasim in her speech, show me a politicain that has not used Sarcasim. I'm reminded of Obama's remarks regarding the, "need" for, "Those people to cling to guns and religion!" Would my opponent consider that remark sarcasim, or downright ignorant and meanspirited if not elitest? 2) Has my opponent heard the remarks from the Obama campaign questioning wheter Palin, with several small children, is up to the task of VP? Has my opponent heard anyone question whether Obama, with 2 small children, is up the task of President? After all, Obam's wife and would be First Lady, is a career woman herself. Just another example of conveiniant sexism. 3) Yes, I said liberal media and I can back up my assertion! My opponent may not be aware that MSNBC has sidelined its two most liberal anchors, Chris matthews and Keith Olbermann, due to their blatent liberal bias in their campaign coverage. This link will spell it out clearly: http://www.telegraph.co.uk... This move was not the result of the likes of me, or those who think as I do. This move was the result of the blatent bias displayed by both since the inception of the "Obama for president" announcement. 3) Has my opponent read the "US" article released the day of Sarah Palin's speech before the RNC. Is my opponent aware that Sarah Palin has more executive experience than Obama and Biden put together? The fact that the Press and even the Obama campaign chose to focus soley on Palin's "Small town" mayorship, but conveiniantly disregard that Palin is an extremely effective Govenor of the largest state in the Union, Alaska, shows a left leaning bias. We know more about Sarah Palin than we know about Obama and we have the liberal media to thank for that. The liberal media will not ask Obama a tough question, or if they have, it's not been published. I challenge my opponent to put forth one, not two, but ONE negative news artical about Obama from any of the Network news opperations and/or their affiliates. To make it a bit easier for my opponent, I will expand that to include The New York Times and Washington post. Just ONE negative comment, remark, or observation from any liberal news oranization! You won't find any! Now do a search on the same media and you will find hundreds of examples of negative coverage of Hillary clinton. Sexism? How else can it be described? Can my opponent put forth proof that Sen. Robert Byrde has publically renounced his affiliation with the KKK? If so, please provide us with such statement. Also, please provide proof that, ....KKK members are far more likely to vote Republican than Democrat in 2008? I suspect that my opponent BELIEVES this to be true, but I suspect that my opponent cannot and will not back this statement up. My contention, or belief, is that the votes of the KKK will not be cast for Obama because of his race, but I cannot prove this. The only known vote from a KKK member, past, or present, will be made in the senate, forthwith. I've submitted the proof of the liberal bias in the media and I have referenced a couple of the hundreds of misogynistic remarks made by the democrat party. Does my opponent believe that Bill and Hillary Clinton are complaining about a non-existant bias?