BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
ny giants are a better team this year then the dallas cowboys

hold the same position Ok so lets break this down by position. http://en.wikipedia.org...... http://en.wikipedia.org...... Qb. Romo vs manning Manning has lead the giants to the preseason every year that he has been a starter. Manning as won to NFC east championships with one NFC championship. Manning has lead the giants to the superbowl becoming the MVP as well as going to a probowl in 2008. Romo has lead his started for 2007 and 2008... he made it to the playoffs and choked as he did in the previous year as a back up. Then failed to return to the playoffs in 2008. That's with having one of the most explosive offenses in the NFL. Rb. Marion barber is good and Jacobs is comparable in terms of dominance. Te. Jason Witten is better then Kevin boss. So 1-1 tie Offensive line Giants are known to have one of the best offensive lines in the league returning the same 5 starters that went to the superbowl. The cowboys returning all 5 starters as well but they all combine for 45 years in nfl experience... so they are on the way down the old hill in the nfl... they tend to get beat and be a lot slower then the year before. Def. Dallas does have d.ware but thats about it when it comes to def. The giants had No. 1-ranked rushing attack in 2008 and have just beefed up the def. even more then ever. With the addition of Chris cant, b. berrian, as well as osi coming back healthy this year. Linebacker's giants have the advantage. And secondary is comparable. So it here goes the wr debate. Yes as it looks the cowboy do have a better #1 wr as the giants are still looking to name a #1 wr but where the cowboys messed up was letting go of T.O. Roy Williams is the #1 for Dallas but has only had great numbers when next to a good second wr... this year he does not have a viable second wr that is commanding. Now the giants do lack wr. But where they lack they make up in potential. Steve smith will be the #1 rec. which was a great pick up from usc in the second round of the 2007 draft and has been very successful in the slot position. So i turn 2006 draft in the second round where we picked up moss. Then in 2008 draft picked up Mario manningham, which would have been a #1 wr in that draft if not for the smoking of maryjane. Then this year we pick up a #1 wr in nicks who had the best college catch in 2007. As well as the 3rd round pick in ramses barden that is a 6'6" wr. And one of the best in double a. 50 tds in his collge cerrer and 18 consecutive games with a TD reception and breaking the 17 game record he held with Jerry Rice And coaching is tipped in the giants favor as well with a coach that at least has won a superbowl and playoff games. There is not much to say other then the giants are a better team... not in every aspect but in the majority Giants 4-2 as far as comparability in major aspects of the game http://en.wikipedia.org...... http://en.wikipe......
ny giants are a better team this year then the dallas cowboys

Yeah yeah... wow 2012... i cannot believe i typed that. Ok so lets break this down by position. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... Qb. Romo vs manning Manning has lead the giants to the preseason every year that he has been a starter. Manning as won to NFC east championships with one NFC championship. Manning has lead the giants to the superbowl becoming the MVP as well as going to a probowl in 2008. Romo has lead his started for 2007 and 2008... he made it to the playoffs and choked as he did in the previous year as a back up. Then failed to return to the playoffs in 2008. That's with having one of the most explosive offenses in the NFL. Rb. Marion barber is good and Jacobs is comparable in terms of dominance. Te. Jason Witten is better then Kevin boss. So 1-1 tie Offensive line Giants are known to have one of the best offensive lines in the league returning the same 5 starters that went to the superbowl. The cowboys returning all 5 starters as well but they all combine for 45 years in nfl experience... so they are on the way down the old hill in the nfl... they tend to get beat and be a lot slower then the year before. Def. Dallas does have d.ware but thats about it when it comes to def. The giants had No. 1-ranked rushing attack in 2008 and have just beefed up the def. even more then ever. With the addition of Chris cant, b. berrian, as well as osi coming back healthy this year. Linebacker's giants have the advantage. And secondary is comparable. So it here goes the wr debate. Yes as it looks the cowboy do have a better #1 wr as the giants are still looking to name a #1 wr but where the cowboys messed up was letting go of T.O. Roy Williams is the #1 for Dallas but has only had great numbers when next to a good second wr... this year he does not have a viable second wr that is commanding. Now the giants do lack wr. But where they lack they make up in potential. Steve smith will be the #1 rec. which was a great pick up from usc in the second round of the 2007 draft and has been very successful in the slot position. So i turn 2006 draft in the second round where we picked up moss. Then in 2008 draft picked up Mario manningham, which would have been a #1 wr in that draft if not for the smoking of maryjane. Then this year we pick up a #1 wr in nicks who had the best college catch in 2007. As well as the 3rd round pick in ramses barden that is a 6'6" wr. And one of the best in double a. 50 tds in his collge cerrer and 18 consecutive games with a TD reception and breaking the 17 game record he held with Jerry Rice And coaching is tipped in the giants favor as well with a coach that at least has won a superbowl and playoff games. There is not much to say other then the giants are a better team... not in every aspect but in the majority Giants 4-2 as far as comparability in major aspects of the game http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipe...
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

OK Before i Start this Debate I would like to set some rules Number 1. I can use the Bible as proof the Bible is real Number 2. no Name calling OK here we go with the Debate I strongly Believe and have faith that the Bible is proof God is real why well the Bible and History, History talks a lot about the Bible Daniel cannot refute that. History talks about the shroud of turin I have seen Video Evidence of what History has to say about the shroud of turin here is a YouTube link http://www.youtube.com... / Me Quote on the Link I gave you it is what History has said about the shroud of turin and there are Scientists who are Christians as well who fellow the Bible you also will see Scientists talking in the link i sent to you have a watch it is a video Evidence to my claim :) I would ask Daniel one thing have you Daniel ever seen a Bible before
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

I am for the position that the Bibles are NOT proof that God exists, because it is a set of books written by man in a time of very little scientific understanding. I also think that the bibles were written to control people. Man created God, not the other way around.Rules for this debate:1. You must debate this issue ONLY and cannot ask a question that is not directly in relation.2. You must use proper grammar and spelling. Spell check is available if you need it.3. Please use sources as much as possible, the Bibles are not a good source, use websites and documents instead.
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

Daniel I have given u a lot of proof, that the Bible is real :) so if I say there: was a Earthquake that has happen. in History you Daniel would not believe me to me that is crazy, anyone in their right mind would believe someone who has said there has being Wars Famines and Earthquakes well Daniel you want proof and Evidence so I gave you Proof and Evidence that the Bible is Proof of God being very real I will give u more Proof and Evidence of God being very real Daniel you do not have any faith in God right so for you to believe and have faith in God you will have to call out of your throat and believe in your heart that God who is Jesus Christ is real Daniel you will need to do a lot more then try to disprove God to believe in God Daniel would you right now call on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ if you do then you will be saved the Apostle Paul said in Romans 10:9-13 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. 13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. / Me Quote Daniel if you call out to God who is Jesus Christ tonight and ask the Lord Jesus Christ to show himself to you Jesus will i have asked Father God to show me Jesus Christ in dreams visions and Jesus Christ has came to me but I had to have faith in Jesus Christ to do it the Bible say's in Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. / Me Quote Daniel just call out to Jesus Christ :) that is when you will believe God is real
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

"If someone believes that their has being war's and famines and earthquakes that has happen, Then they will believe what the Lord Jesus Christ said in Matthew 24:6-7"No they won't! Just because someone says something so vague and generalized, does not mean it is true or proof that the bible or god is true. You can have historical facts in the bible and it still not be true. There are many Fictional books that have real places and happenings in them, a good example i the DaVinci Code by Dan Brown. Or the movie National Treasure with Nicholas Cage. Does that mean the book or the movie is real? NOSorry, but you have not supplied any evidence to prove the bible proves that god exists. I am not asking for proof the bible is real.
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

What evidence doI have that the Bible is a 100% accurate that proves God who is Jesus Christ, well there has being War's And famines and Earthquakes anyone will believe that there has being War's and Famines and Earthquakes that has Happen If someone believes that their has being war's and famines and earthquakes that has happen, Then they will believe what the Lord Jesus Christ said in Matthew 24:6-7 King James Version (KJV) 6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. / Me Quote now that proof's the BIBLE to be 100 percent Accurate and Correct :) because their has being War's and the has being Earthquakes. and their has being famines, and there still are earthquakes happen now,' and their still are rumors of War and Famines and earth Quakes happening as we speak, look at the war's over the years :) now here is more proof and Evidence that the BIBLE is 100 percent Accurate and Correct, The walls of Jericho are real correct well the bible mentions the walls of Jericho fell the bible say's in Hebrews 11:30 King James Version (KJV) 30 By faith the walls of Jericho fell down, after they were compassed about seven days.
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

Dale, just because I quote and reference something out of your own bibles, that you do not even know, does NOT mean I affirm that Jesus or God is real. That is called delusional.You are correct, if you say there are people in a park, it could mean 3, but it could also mean 4 or more other people. Your bibles do not stipulate how many.That was a wonderful video on Albert Einstein, but how exactly does it prove your bible is proof of god's existence? You have faile to provide any evidence for this.Okay, as for a circle not being a sphere:Circle - http://mathworld.wolfram.com...Sphere - http://mathworld.wolfram.com...;As for what is my point with Job 38:19,20? Well it is to show that the last statement and source you gave in round 2 is full of misinformation! Wind is the movement of air and it consists of air, but it is not air. The wind on mars consists of CO2 and is not considered air, so wind and air cannot be used as the same thing. You have still not provided any evidence that your bibles are proof of God's existence.
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

wow Daniel really said something really great, Daniel said this to me The only reference to a visit from anyone during the birth of Jesus were Shepherds (Luke 2:15) / Me Quote it is nice for Daniel to say that The only reference to a visit from anyone during the birth of Jesus were Shepherds (Luke 2:15) / Me Quote it really goes to show that Daniel knows deep in his heart that the Bible is real :) / Me Quote well Mr Daniel There can mean 3 people right like for example if I was to say there where people at the park and if someone tells me I can say about 3 people :) Daniel you said this to me Where is your proof that Einstein proves god exists? And even if you give proof, how does that have anything to do with the bibles? / Me Quote easy the last 4 words you said Daniel where this Einstein proves god exists? / Me Quote lol ahhahahahhahahahha here is my proof that Einstein proves god exists? here is a link http://www.youtube.com... fellow the link that proves Einstein proves god exists? Daniel said this to me The earth is a sphere (Isaiah 40:22). Isaiah 40:22 New International Version (NIV) 22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. A CIRCLE is not a sphere! / Me Quote Daniel how do u know a CIRCLE is not a sphere! I expect you Daniel to back up what you said about A CIRCLE is not a sphere! / Me Quote Daniel said this to me 2. Light moves (Job 38:19,20). Job 38:19-20 New International Version (NIV) 19 "What is the way to the abode of light? And where does darkness reside? 20 Can you take them to their places? Do you know the paths to their dwellings? No where doe is say anything about light moving. / me Quote Daniel what is your point with Job 38:19,20 Daniel win and air are the same i can choose to say win or air it doesn't matter
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

First, I don't think anyone has not seen the Documentary the History channel broadcasted. And I don't think anyone reading this debate would waste their time on a hour and a half long video that is a few years old. I have given proof that the Shroud was a hoax. You can believe it or not, but the proof is there.Second, Matthew 2, there is no indication of how many wisemen came to visit the young child Jesus, nor does it say he was a baby. The only reference to a visit from anyone during the birth of Jesus were Shepherds (Luke 2:15)http://www.snopes.com...Where is your proof that Einstein proves god exists? And even if you give proof, how does that have anything to do with the bibles?The bibles are also full of contradictions that proves the bibles are not truth.http://www.evilbible.com...As for your last source, I can prove some of it is false by a couple searches of your own Bibles:1. The earth is a sphere (Isaiah 40:22). Isaiah 40:22 New International Version (NIV) 22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. A CIRCLE is not a sphere! 2. Light moves (Job 38:19,20). Job 38:19-20 New International Version (NIV) 19 “What is the way to the abode of light? And where does darkness reside?20 Can you take them to their places? Do you know the paths to their dwellings? No where doe is say anything about light moving.3. Air has weight (Job 28:25). Job 28:25 King James Version (KJV) 25 To make the weight for the winds; and he weigheth the waters by measure. There is no mention of air, only wind and when they were talking about the weight, they meant force, because they did not have a word for that.You really need to do a little more research of your own bibles before you use scripture and sites as sources.
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

is that the best you can do Daniel give me a video of 3:10 the video link i posted was about 1.27:56 the Link i posted tells everyone more about the shroud of Turin / Me Quote The shroud of Turin is 2000 years old and another thing to is I don't think that the The shroud of Turin shows Jesus beard why because I see the face of Jesus on the shroud of Turin Daniel said this to me How can you say that something that was written by man can be the word of god or proof of his existence? / Me Quote well God spoke through people to give people a message the Apostle Peter said in 2 Peter 1:21 King James Version (KJV) 21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. / Me Quote someone rote the Bible and how I know that something like the bible was written by man can be the word of god or proof of his existence? is this Jesus birth, there where eye witness who sore Jesus born there where 3 wise Men that came to Jesus The Bible say's in Matthew 2:8-9 King James Version (KJV) 8 And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also. 9 When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was. Daniel there are a lot of other proof for the bible being real because of Einstein Proves God Exists plus Science Confirms the Bible http://evidencebible.com...
The Bibles are NOT proof of God's existence.

First off, quoting the History Channel is not a good source for this argument.Second, the shroud of Turin has been found to be a hoax.YouTube sources provided:http://www.youtube.com...http://www.youtube.com... Website sources:http://skepdic.com...http://cybercomputing.com...Third, YES Dale, I have seen and read your bibles before. Let me reiterate that, BIBLES. The reason I am using it in a plural form is because of the different variations and versions of the Bible. My question to you would be, have you read the unedited first edition of the bible which was then translated and revised over centuries? I don't think you have. How can you say that something that was written by man can be the word of god or proof of his existence?Remember, you are trying to use the Bibles as proof that the Bibles are true and it proves god exists. This is called circular reasoning and I can do the same thing with Harry Potter and I have 7 completely different books to prove he is real.Source for circular reasoning:http://www.youtube.com...
Heroin should be legalized

My opponent has forfeit his turn and leaves me with more time to fortify my argument. As I stated in the previous rounds, Heroin is a relatively benign drug, with the most major side effects including constipation and nausea. My opponent brought up the very valid concern of Heroin abuse in pregnant women. While it is important to stress that there is no single chemical that is 100% safe for all women, opiates are not associated with any physical birth defects. The primary concern is that opiates are passed from the mother to the baby, causing the baby to become addicted and experience withdrawal symptoms. These symptoms themselves can be harmful to young children, but this problem can be easily avoided by switching to a methadone substitute during the pregnancy. http://www.thewomens.org.au... http://www.methadoneandpregnancy.com... Before Heroin and other opiates were criminalized, they were hardly even seen as a public health problem. Most people believed that opiate use was simply morally wrong, akin to dancing or sexuality at the time. Even still, it did not have the same stigma about it as alcohol did, and rightfully so. It was seen as a luxury good, a symbols of excess, not as a symbol of social deviancy. http://www.druglibrary.org... Legalizing Heroin would decrease the profit margins of terrorist groups, and allow for Afghanistan to have a legitimate economy that did not rely on illegal goods. If this is accomplished, terrorist groups will loose a massive source of revenue, one that simply cannot be recouped by focusing on other drugs. The entire Heroin market would fall out beneath them, and their artificial monopoly would crumble. http://libertyunbound.com...
Jojo bows

I believe that JoJo bows should not be banned, as they are like designer clothes. Sure, many people are not willing to pay the high price for them, however the few that are enjoy the clothes. Wearing clothes or accessories that you think make you look good boost your confidence, which is unarguably good. Nobody is forcing you to buy the bow and spend 12 pounds on it. People buy them because they can afford it and they like them/think they make them look prettier. To address the point you made on bullying, the same can be said about shoes, clothes, bags.. Pretty much anything. If you have something that others do not like, you might get bullied. Sure, its not good, but we can't just go around banning things because people get bullied for having them. Lastly, I don't agree that UK schools are banning them. They allow you to express your personality , which is always good. They don't hurt anyone, so there is no need to buy them.
Jojo bows

I think that jojo bows are cute but rip you off. They cost 8-12 pounds WHICH IS A LOT FOR JUST A BOW LIKE WHAT? I just think the UK has made a great decision in banning them because they are cute and all, bot it could cause bullying because of what type of Jojo bow you have. I know, it is a weird topic to debate about but like they look cute and all, like I've said, but they rip you off and form many bullying problems. I have actually got a tweet which confirms the expensive part. Link : http://www.claires.co.uk.... By the way, 10 pounds is $12.82. Anyone wanna compete with me? You've only got 2 weeks to vote. Ta ta for now.