It should be Legal to throw acid at women who are Feminists

My opponent seems to think he is debating with more than one person, he often says "they" despite having a debate with just me. I'm not sure why he says this exactly, as I have not recieved any help from anyone on this topic. Also not sure why he very rudely thinks I am upset that women don't give me a boner and why he thinks I want to splash acid on women for this, this couldn't be further from the truth. Misogonists hate women. I'd desribe myself as anti-feminist, not anti-women. The goverments solution to every problem is to make problems otherthan feminsim illegal, even if innocent people are punished in the process. This approach is crazy. It has been proven that people respond better to positive reinforement rather than negative reinforcement. And the prison system does not work. "In theory, having a criminal record in Britain should not prevent a person from doing much, unless it is for violent or sexual offences. But in practice, the legal obligation to disclose a record, and the discrimination that follows, restricts access to everything from jobs to insurance, loans and travel. That has a huge impact on former prisoners—contributing, some argue, to Britain’s exceptionally high re-offending rate." {1}"Every law will be broken, no matter how heinous the crime is, and yet we still have laws."I agree with this statement. However he then says laws act as an obvious deterrent, this may be true for some crimes but laws against rape and throwing acid have certainly not made any impact. If you look back at the graph I showed, if the law truly deterred people from throwing acid on somebody the number (notice it's not percentage) of victims would be much lower than that shown after 2002 when you consider offenders are taken off the streets for a long time ~ 10 years, or given a death sentence. The population has been growing by only 1.25% by my approximation, see link below for exact figures, this is not sufficient to explain what you see. The true picture is not made clear, they just want to show a graph showing a decline since the law was introduced.http://www.worldometers.info...Acid attacks still occur at similar rates if not greater despite it being illegal to throw acid on someone, the only thing that can make a difference is making acid harder to obtain by having stricter regulations on the sale of acid, and encouraging the use of a weaker acid to better serve the purpose of someone wanting to throw acid on someone. Acid throwers don't intend to kill people; there are far more effective ways to kill a person, their aim is oviously to disfigure. However Nitric and Sulphuric acid can dissolve bone, and can easily cause an unintentional death especially if it is not thoroughly washed off or neutralised quickly. Doesn't it make sense to deter people using stronger acids? It's impossible to stop acid getting into the hands of people who want to throw it on someone because acid has so many uses e.g. Nitric can be bought from jewelry shops since polishers generally use it to purify gold and metals. Hydrochloric acid is used to make soy sauce, traditional medicine and cosmetics.Some scholars have warned that stringent regulations on the sale of acid may result in black market trading of acids - wikipedia Therefore regulating the sale of acid is not the only thing that needs to be done! Throwing hydrochloric acid at feminists should be made legal to prevent more serious injuries and deaths. People like Elliot Rodgers who are often desribed as jealous, see link below, are actually victms of feminism, and it is important to consider such people when the chance of being attacked by acid is also small i.e. 1500/6 billion = 0.00000025% each year [2] If it were legal to throw hydrochloric acid less women would die by gunshot wounds, because acid would probably be used instead, and the victims wouldn't be random. There aren'tmany people who want to throw acid on someone - about 1500 per year worldwide, and yes they do need to take responsibility because there would have to be evidence to show the victim is a feminist. I have chosen to show statistics for Bangladesh as most acid attacks occur in south asia, but they are on the increase worldwide, including the U.K. where they have doubled over the last 10 years, affecting more men than women [3] in fact it is twice as many men than women yet feminists completely ignore this fact and just talk about countries elsewhere like Bangladesh to degrade menFinally i'd like my opponent to look at this link, showing ways that graphs can be manipulated:https://en.wikipedia.org... Misleading graphs misrepresent data and result in an incorrect conclusion, graphs may be excessively complex or poorly constructed either intentionally or accidentally. Even when constructed to accurately display the characteristics of their data, graphs can be subject to different interpretation. sources:[1] http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk...[2] http://www.newstatesman.com...[3] http://www.theguardian.com...