Russia Shouldn't Be Blamed for Malaysia Airlines Flight 17

Thank you for listing sources, it makes it much easier to analyze your argument. I did not say it was impossible to shoot down a passenger aircraft at 10 km, so please read my argument again. Both sources I listed read from 20-40 kilometers in altitude as there are multiple types of BUK systems. You also did NOT say 'deployed from Kursk', you said "fired at the plane from a Russian BUK Launcher from Kursk, Russia"which directly states a BUK missile launcher shot missiles while stationed in the city of Kursk. Your use of the word 'from' implies the BUK missile system was stationed in Kursk at the time of firing. The reason I imply that Ukraine may be responsible for shooting down the plane is because Ukraine had suspicion that Russia was providing air drops to Ukrainian rebels filled with resources to help in combat, which has not been proven. Regardless, Ukraine believes that Russia is exercising aerial support for Eastern separatists and would shoot down the plane for violating Ukrainian sovereign territory. Not because you think I meant Ukraine would shoot down their own AN-16, it's well implied what I mean when I said Ukraine would shoot down a possible Russian plane. Your video surveillance shows the explosion of the plane crash, NOT the BUK missile system firing. Ukraine's armed forces was also well within presence of the plane to shoot it down themselves mistaking it for a Russian military transport. As for your telograph.uk source, it does not confirm the evidence that Russian separatists had shot down the plane, it simply describes the situation with constant hints that Russian separatists may have done it. Russia also DOES have reasoning to why they would deny a case to not continue investigation. The number one nation providing allegations that Russia was responsible for bringing down the plane is the United States. The United States has a history of faking evidence for self interests or bringing down rival reputations for their own cause. An example would be Iraq [1], the United States faked intelligence documents on Iraqi WMD's in order to siphon Iraqi resources under the pretense of national and global security. Another example is when Libya (Before Gaddafi became a sociopath murderer) had one of their national airliners shot down in the Sinai Peninsula over Israeli occupied territories. Israel shot down a civilian airliner, KNOWINGLY, and faced international sanctions [2]. The United States allegedly participated in disturbing the investigation scene and clean-up in order to preserve Israel from sanctions and advance American interests in the Middle East although they still internationally condemned the action, just like Russia condemned Ukraine. Ukraine has also mistakenly shot down airliners before, such as Siberian Airlines Flight 1812 [3] in a completely unexcused incident, in 2001. Ukraine was not in a state of war or threat of peace-time and still shot down a civilian airliner and denied having been responsible for shooting it down. 7 years later, enough evidence was provided to prove it was them. Furthermore, I know about the UN Article that you have mentioned. You didn't need to post the actual UN website. I asked for evidence of Russia covering up evidence or twisting information which you still did not provide meaning one of your arguments is still unfounded. Finally, your Igor Post Source. As I mentioned with American history on warping evidence to advance Washington's agenda, John Kerry is not trustworthy. His word cannot and was not backed up. The deeper source links that politifact.com provided was not a proper foundation to Kerry's argument. One example is the YouTube channel that posted the crash of the airplane. That channel is independent and heavily biased. Just like any independent news channel, their primary objective was to stir bias, not information [4]. Furthermore, the other source links your website source provided only mentioned possibilities, not confirmation as you said, that rebels had shot down the plane. Allegations without evidence is not a confirmation, and only assumptions. Even in the possibility that the rebels had shot down the plane, it is not Russia to blame. Even if Russia had provided the materials and BUK system that the rebels may have used it would have been rebel mismanagement and not the fault of Russia. For example, the United Kingdom sells bombs to Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is bombing Yemen. Many civilians are being killed in Yemen yet the United Kingdom isn't under international prosecution. It would apply if Russia is or isn't deploying weaponry to Eastern separatists which Kerry nor your source has proven other than simple allegations.Sources: [1] http://www.cnn.com...[2] https://en.wikipedia.org...[3] https://en.wikipedia.org...[4] https://www.youtube.com...