If the B-Theory of time is true, then Christianity is implausible

Argument In Favor Of The Resolution P1: If the B-Theory of time is true, (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) are true: (i) The Christian doctrine of Creatio Ex Nihilo is false (ii) There is no creator of the universe (heavens and the Earth) (iii) Free will does not exist (iv) There is no God who can have a personal relationship with human beings (v) There is no such thing as evil that can be objectively overcomeP2: If (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) are true, Christianity is implausible Conclusion: If the B-Theory of time is true, Christianity is implausibleDefense Of The Premises Defense of Premise 1If B-Theory is true, then the past, present and future all exist tenselessly in a 4d or n+1d block, with the present image seen on progression through this four-dimensional space-time block, and being no more real than those before or after [1]. The "Big Bang" would just essentially exist as a point (or "points") on this block, and would not actually be a point in which the universe begins to exist. This means that the universe never comes into being, as William Lane Craig notes:"On a B-Theory of time, the universe does not in fact come into being or become actual at the Big Bang; it just exists tenselessly as a four-dimensional space-time block that is finitely extended in the earlier than direction. " - William Lane Craig [2] Dr. Craig's philosophical definition even precludes a B-Theory universe as that which comes into being:"e comes into being at t if and only if (1) e exists at t, (2) t is the first time at which e exists, (3) there is no state of affairs in the actual world in which e exists timelessly, and (4) e’s existing at t is a tensed fact. " [3]The universe existing at t would not objectively be a tensed fact if the universe is tenseless. Therefore, if B-Theory is true, then it should be self-evident that both (i) and (ii) with regards to premise 1 of my argument are indeed true. If the universe did not come into being, then it could not have been created out of nothing. There could be no creator at all. At best the Theist could claim God "sustains" the universe in being, but the Christian God is a creator not just a "sustainer" by definition. How would we know (iii) is true if B-Theory is true? Well, if all past, present, and future points exist tenselessly on this block in question, then anything our consciousness picks up would be necessary because there is no chance to choose different (free will by definition is "the power of acting without the constraint of necessity") [4]. Therefore, if B-Theory is true, then (iii) is true. What about (iv)? The only way for a timeless being to have a relationship with beings in the universe is if he puts himself in time right at the coming into existence of time. Otherwise it would be metaphysically infeasible due to the disconnection from beings who experience time tensed in the block, pertaining to a truly timeless being. William Lane Craig concludes that this is required as well:"The decision to create on God's part, is a decision to enter into time to take on a temporal mode of existence in order to relate to his creatures. " - William Lane Craig (Video Source 1:15)If God is frozen and timeless then he cannot relate to human beings. Therefore, if B-Theory is true, (iv) is true. We know (v) is true if B-Theory is true, because if the past is just as real as "now", then evil is never overcome because all evil of the past is as objectively as real as the present. Christianity relies on the notion that evil is overcome. Defense of Premise 2The negation of (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) is vital to Christianity. Therefore, I believe this premise is self-evident. Sources[1] . http://plato.stanford.edu...[2] The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, pp. 183-184. [3] . http://www.reasonablefaith.org...[4] Google Dictionary . http://www.youtube.com...