JK Rowling's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was plagiarized from Willy the Wizard

You wrote "With your Joseph Campbell and Star Wars: Revealed You Tube theories, Joseph Campbell is wrong and nothing what he says that it claims to be (1). All of my opponent's "Star Wars: Revealed" You tube videos that my opponent's has is wrong, according to my first source. " When you said how a bunch of smart people cannot be wrong, well my You Tube videos are full of successful filmmakers, professors of Hamilton and Dana College, two people who are or was Speaker of the House, and doctors, how can they be wrong? With your first source saying Joseph Campbell is wrong, well explain how can a bunch of successful and smart people can be wrong? How would Peter Jackson, JJ Abrams, Nancy Pelosi, Newt Gingrich, professors of college and doctors all be wrong? And how often you see Pelosi and Gingrich having the same point a view? My opponent also wrote "My second opponent's statement is that "the Goblet of Fire" are the common uses of literature and other fiction throughout paragraphs 4-7, his ‘second reason' he calls it. It might be true but it is how it is written in both books that define the copyright. There are at least 44 parts of copyright between Willy the Wizard and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Is having 44 points of the same material between Willy the Wizard and the Goblet of Fire would be a coincidence? The truth is NO. " Writing 44 parts between two or more stories can be a coincidence. One example is between "Alice in Wonderland" and "Spirited Away" where two of the stories where a young female protagonist, goes to a parallel world and tries to find a way home (1). With Alice and Wonderland and Spirited Away with a lot of similarities (look at my second argument's You Tube video) it is possible that JK Rowling a lot of the same ideas from Willy the Wizard or any other novels without realizing it. We have to remember, there are more than a million stories in the world and one new story can have the same of many ideas from any of one of the million stories. Also, "ideas" are not protected by copyrights (2)(3). You wrote that your side is solid all because of three lawyers and an entire law firm says so. Well Rowling, Bloomsbury and Scholastic Inc. has lawyers too and this will be the case of lawyers vs. lawyers. Rowling has lawyers and wants to dismiss the case (4). So in this lawyer battle, it is about being smart vs. being smarter. With new development… One of the claims is that both books are based on a boy wizard, competing in competitions (5). A boy as a protagonist is not rare to novels and other fiction. Pokemon has a boy as Ash Ketchum as the main protagonist (6) and there are very more examples of boy as the protagonist (7). Wizards are also common to the novel and fiction world (8) and international competition are also common to the story and fictional world (9). Competitions are also common in real life such as the Olympics, World Cup, sports, game shows and etc. Combining all three ideas can happen. Coming back that using Wizards are very common, well the NBA team, the Washington Wizards also shows how common and how easy thinking wizards can be. Even your lawyer, Thomas R. Kline who lives in Washington DC (10) miss that fact. So how can anyone rely on a lawyer's statement, when he can't realize a big hint about how common of thinking wizards can be? It is not a fact that you can easily miss, especially a lawyer from Washington DC. In fact, all of Paul Allen's lawyers missed that fact and the fact how common wizards, boys as the protagonist and competitions are or the lawsuit would not exist. That tells that Paul Allen just wants money and they are jealous of Rowling's success, not the value of his own book itself. To be clear, no novel or any other fiction will not be thinking as an original. When you think of having a samurai in your novel you are thinking samurais from the 1800s and earlier. That thought samurai came from the history of the samurais, not from your own mind itself. Rowling thinking of a boy wizard competing in a competition can come from anywhere, not just Willy the Wizard. Willy the Wizard is not the only one with having a boy protagonist, having a wizard and having a competition in novels and other fiction. Any of those three ideas separately could come from anywhere, not just Willy the Wizard. There are more than a million novels, other fiction and real life events that can influence Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Next round… . http://www.youtube.com... (1). http://en.wikipedia.org... (2). http://harvardlaw74.com... (3). http://www.copyright.gov... (4). http://www.hollywoodnews.com... (5). http://www.dailymail.co.uk... (6). http://en.wikipedia.org... (7). http://tvtropes.org... (8). http://www.amazon.com... (9). http://tvtropes.org... (10). http://www.andrewskurth.com...