The Bible Teaches the Trinity, namely, God is three Persons

Also, I was running low on time so I did not address every detail in full length, but this is not to be taken as agreement. Prayers to JesusJust a quick note. Many others receive prayers such a Saints. This does not make them God too. God AND JesusNow we need to talk about "Prepositional Constructions (with phrases containing prepositions: "of God;" "in the Lord;" "God of. .. ;" etc. ) are known by NT grammarians to cause uncertainty of article usage. That is, if a prepositional phrase (including genitives) is attached to a word, that word may sometimes have the article ("the") and sometimes not have it without changing the intended meaning! This means that the NT writers sometimes wrote, for example, "The God of me" (with article) and "_God of me" (without article) with exactly the same intended meaning. The definite article ("the") was ambiguous in such cases therefore any grammatical rules which depend on the presence or absence of the article in the NT Greek must not use as examples those scriptures which use a 'prepositional' construction attached to a word (noun) in question if they are to be used honestly and properly. " [3]. Now looking at Titus 2:13 [4] "'of us' in Titus 2:13 and 2 Peter 1:1 is a 'prepositional' genitive, and even "savior" itself is a genitive in both scriptures and literally means 'of savior;'"The Trinity violates logicMy opponent has apparently never heard of formal logic, which I did say was the logic I was using unlike how my opponent falsely claimed I didn't say what logic I was using. Formal logic goes all the way back to Aristotle. Formal logic is where we get syllogism and logical fallacies. A good example of a syllogism isPremise 1: A=BPremise 2: B=CConclusion: A=CThere is noting you can do to make the Premises true, but the conclusion false. Premise 1: The Father = God [1]. Premise 2: The Son = God [1]. Conclusion: The Father = The SonExcept the Trinity denies this conclusion because "The Father is not the Son" [1]. It violates formal Logic. There is nothing about the existence of God that violates Formal logic, although some argue it violates other forms of logic. My opponent also mentions quantum mechanics which says some particles are so tiny you can't even measure them without changing them but the this theory only works if before you measure them the particle is in a superposition, which is every possible state at the same time. However, this seems quite pointless to bring up since God is omnipresent, so he is not only at 3 place at once, but everywhere. Further, this wasn't the problem I made about the Trinity. The trinity is not 3 Gods or 1 God + 1 God + 1 God. This makes it seem like each are separate Gods the way my opponent wrote this. My opponent seems to keep avoiding this part even though this was my very first objection and even stated why. Instead they keep misrepresenting what I am actually saying. John 14:28Divine: heavenly, godlike. Angels are heavenly beings which can do supernatural things. They are thus divine beings. He gets the name of Christ, the messiah, because it is the most imporatant name to humans because without this name there is no hope of salvation. Even in most translations of the Bible God name is read as LORD or GOD. The section of Philippians discussed here deals with "Christ’s Example of Humility" [6]. "Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped," (Philippians 2:4-6). The first part says to put others before yourself then it goes on to say have the same mind set as Christ Jesus. Then though he was in the form of God, probably like all men were created in the image of God (Genisis 1:27), and the explicitly says did not count equality with God. This shows Humility; equating yourself with God would be the opposite of humility. As what what Bible I read I usually prefer the English Standard Version. No Man Has Seen GodWhat does oxygen look like? From Far away like this And from close up like this My GodIt is important to note “God” is not the name of God. Matthew 28:17 actually says "And when they saw him they worshiped him, but some doubted. " I see no giving of any authority like my opponent claims. The difference between a voice and a trumpet is that a trumpet is a external object, and a voice is an internal property. OmniscientHumans don't perform miracles only supernatural beings can. John 16:30 says "Now we know that you know all things and do not need anyone to question you; this is why we believe that you came from God. " This makes the distictions between God and Jesus. Even My opponent said Jesus on Earth had "limited knowledge", but anyways as stated in Mathhew 24:36 "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. " Since Jesus is not the Father the is something he does not know. UncreatedIt is true that nothing anyone can see was made without Jesus. My opponent says "Isa 44:26 says God created ALONE. HE HAD NO HELP" Lets see what Isaiah 44:26 says "who confirms the word of his servant and fulfills the counsel of his messengers, who says of Jerusalem, ‘She shall be inhabited,’ and of the cities of Judah, ‘They shall be built, and I will raise up their ruins’;" [2]. Unless I am reading this wrong there is nothing about God getting no help. Also, "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. " (John 3:16). To beget means create or cause. This means The Father beget/created the Son. Who is the Savior? That is just misunderstood. The same wording appears in Psalm 45:6 [5], and if that verse was read like how my opponent suggest we should read Hebrews 1:8 then it would say that Israel King was God too. However, we know better than that, and in both situations neither the Son nor the Israel King was called God. Sources[1] . http://www.bbc.co.uk...[2] . http://biblehub.com...[3] . http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com...[4] . http://biblehub.com... [5] . http://biblehub.com...[6] . http://biblehub.com...