9/11 was not a inside job

I applaud my OPP unwavering argumentation. That being said he has failed to prove that 9/11 was a inside job. My OPP stated that the Bush Admin knew about, let it happen, or did it 9/11 commission was just used for biased ends. That is his theory it is not factual. If the Bush Admin is guilty of anything it is lying to cover up its own mistakes but that does not prove an inside job.Defying countless official and non-governmental enquiries, media reporting, and often common sense, a significant number of people fervently disbelieve that Osama bin Ladens al Qaeda sent 19 hijackers to execute the 9/11 massacre. Instead my OPP blames elements within George W. Bushs administration or that the US government didn’t actually blow up its citizens, but knew full well the attacks were coming, then did nothing to stop them. Which is false. Even a decade later, the conspiracy movement is alive and kicking. Groups such as Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, or Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth see themselves as serious researchers exposing perhaps the biggest cover up in US history. A summary of the leading theories is contained in "Loose Change," a homemade documentary viewed nearly 125 million times on Google and some 30 million worldwide on You Tube according to director Dylan Avery.Splicing news footage and interviews, all set to a fast paced beat, Loose Change collates and expands on all the urban legends about 9/11. For example: - The Twin Towers could not have collapsed from airplane impact alone. - The astonishingly rapid collapse of World Trade Center tower 7, despite not being hit by a plane, bore the hallmarks of professional demolition. - Wall Street trading on stocks directly affected by the disaster showed some people knew in advance about what was coming. - A US missile, not American Airlines Flight 77, smashed into the Pentagon. - United Airlines Flight 93 did not crash in a Pennsylvania field, but vanished, perhaps after being shot down by a fighter jet. The United States has long been fertile ground for conspiracy theories. In this parallel world, JFK was assassinated by anyone ranging from the CIA to Cuban exiles. The Moon landing pictures were taken in a studio, while the US government is covering up evidence of UFOs. And American GIs are still held in bamboo cages in Vietnam. Some of them turn about to be true, after all Pearl Harbor was a Japanese conspiracy and Nixons Watergate break in was a cover-up. But with so few that turn out to be true, why do people believe in conspiracies? A new article in Scientific American tries to figure that out. Michael Shermer outlines in his Skeptic column four traits of those who believe: * patternicity, or a tendency to find meaningful patterns in random noise * agenticity, or the bent to believe the world is controlled by invisible intentional agent * confirmation bias, or the seeking and finding of confirmatory evidence for what we already believe * hindsight bias, or tailoring after-the-fact explanations to what we already know happened. A conspiracy theory takes flight when all of these are concocted into a heady mix of conviction. Its called "conspiratorial cognition," and its the fuel driving belief in the 9/11 conspiracy.Anyway my point is that as I stated before conspiracy theories are just that theories. If there was any proof that would that 9/11 was a inside job it would known by now.In conclusion I have shown that there are explanations to the arguments my OPP has put forth. My OPP has not shown any factual evidence that proves 9/11 was an inside job and that is what debate was about. His arguments are based on theory alone.It's vitally important to remember conspiracy theories are just that theories. There is no evidence to prove that they are true. I urge a PRO vote simply because there are no facts that prove a inside job on 9/11 if there were any they would surely be known by now. Any questions can be answered below:http://www.debunking911.com...Once again thx to my OPP and thx to our audience for taking time to review out arguments.