Abortion is Generally Immoral.

Your criticism is quite harsh so i’ll be harsh on you then?! I thought your arguement was good but I have noticed how you have repeated on numerous occasions that "it takes away an innocent child's life" you seem to misunderstand there is a big gap in what you've stated from reality. this is because (a). a child exists from the age of 3-18 (b). no one is being 'killed' because there is 'no one' there isn't a human. There is no value to a non-existant life form. That isnt a 'life' form. PRO, i have already made this very clear to you yet you have chosen to ignore this which becomes frustrating as i now have to repeat: “Nearly all abortions take place in the first trimester, when a fetus cannot exist independent of the mother. As it is attached by the placenta and umbilical cord, its health is dependent on her health, and cannot be regarded as a separate entity as it cannot exist outside her womb. The concept of personhood is different from the concept of human life. Human life occurs at conception, but fertilized eggs used for in vitro fertilization are also human lives and those not implanted are routinely thrown away. Is this murder, and if not, then how is abortion murder?” ^this is all relevant as it counters the whole of your first case as you pointed out i hadnt countered for you… happy now? -__- Also you have not actually explained why raped women shouldn’t be allowed to have abortions. Because you state that it is so bad and your in favour of harsher punishments for rapists. If you so hate the crime of rape so much, it does not make any sense for you to say that raped women should have to be pregnant as a result and cannot get an abortion. This is a big issue that you should consider the horrible effects this would cause. You would be most hated in society for going ahead with that. Pro has also infact addressed me with an absolute lie by claiming that “most of [my points] (if not all) are faulty” His big claim is degrading and disrespectfull. I don’t believe that kind of horrible manner is necessary in a debate. I apoligize for not addressing your points in the first round, infact premises 3 and 4 are the same point split into two paragraphs. So not only are you de-valuing all of my 10 different points but you look very foolish for that as you only appear to have 3 points… so i insist you take caution of what critisism you are giving because it is absolutely irrelevant to a debate, and by doing that, you actually wasted a whole round where you could have been presenting more points for the ban of abortions. And because of that, it suggests your actually the “weak” one here as you cannot provide more information than the same point you use except you put it in different contexts each time to make it seem as if you have more than just “it takes away an innocent life”. You clearly lack other points for yourself, and instead of criticising each point of mine, you should be trying to think of something else to say which isnt just another repeat. Premise 3 from your first arguement was poor, completely muddled and dis-organised. It’s not backed up correctly, the sources you gave, had no contribution whatsoever . The definition of life? what? Pro seems incapable of sticking to the purpose of a debate. We’re not here to criticise people, in the debate your supposed to state and explain your counter points and never to lose the value of another simply because you feel weak not having anything more to say other than ‘it takes away an innocent child’ Pro has chosen to take my points and argue against them by falsely claiming their wrong (which means nothing as he cannot prove that) Different sources can always say different things just because you find one article, and i find another does not mean one wins success pro, it means you have to meet at the point of cancelling it out of the debate as their is no real way of telling which source is true and which one is false. I find it hard to believe that i can be all wrong and you’re all right. That’s unimaginable for anyone to think that in a debate. Just by stating my points are incorrect is an intentionly false statement. In other words, is almost a lie to anyone you have a debate with.happy arguing, pro Sources: http://tinyurl.com... http://tinyurl.com...