White people are less likely to commit crimes. (currently and in the US)

for a great start to this debate round. First and foremost I will accept this debate round. Now to 1) People that identify as white do not match with his studies. First the definition of a "white person" by the United States Census Bureau (. http://quickfacts.census.gov...) White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "White" or report entries such as Irish, German, Italian, Lebanese, Arab, Moroccan, or Caucasian. Black or African American. Under this (which offered no counter definition) all his contentions fall. This is because ALL of his/her studies are focused on African Americans and Latin's and under this definition the people that all "not white" in his studies really are. This has a few impactsA- His/her contention structure is inherently racist, he is assuming that skin color means a type of raceB- His/her contention structure and evidence has no relevance or place in this debate because it does not apply to the topic C- All my contentions will remain under this definition2) The definition of crime (. http://www.merriam-webster.com...)an action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law. This has a few impactsA- His contention structure seems to avoid in crime that is not murder of homicide, thus he has avoided over 80% of all crime in the United StatesB- He does not show you the amount of crime that is, ALL of his relevant studies focus on the number of people convicted1- He/she does not give you any clear reason to believe prosecution rates follow the number for people f each race 2- He/she excludes and other raises other than African American of Latino this show us that we do not know the full scope of the problem C- My definition excludes ANY federal offenses. His already irrelevant studies include federal prosecution thus they cannot be used2) The resolution does not show you that the people even need to be caught for the crime they commuted The resolution talks about commuting crime not being caught for them. The Washington Post (. http://www.washingtonpost.com...) reports to us that white and blacks use drugs (a crime) at the same rate but one is simply asserted more. Even more surprising is what gets left out of the chart: Blacks are far more likely to be arrested for selling or possessing drugs than whites, even though whites use drugs at the same rate. This has a few implications A- He/she does not show you the amount of crime commuted, he/she shows you the number of people persecuted B- Crime is committed but not persucted for whites, ethical problem in our countryIn fact more whites sell drugs then African Americans and this has remained consent for more than 20 years, Washington Post (. http://www.washingtonpost.com...)Whites were about 45 percent more likely than blacks to sell drugs in 1980, according to an analysis of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth by economist Robert Fairlie. This was consistent with a 1989 survey of youth in Boston. My own analysis of data from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health shows that 6.6 percent of white adolescents and young adults (aged 12 to 25) sold drugs, compared to just 5.0 percent of blacks (a 32 percent difference). This shows us a few things A- White people commit more crime in this area then any other race B- This has remained consent throughout the years thus we find that the we can expected it to remain so, date issue 3) There is more white on white than any other race (. http://www.vox.com...)The FBI reports to us about the number of white people murdered (and caught) Yet the disturbing truth, according to the fib's most recent homicide statistics, is that the United States is in the wake of an epidemic of white-on-white crime. Back in 2011, the most recent year for which data is available, a staggering 83 percent of white murder victims were killed by fellow Caucasians. This is very important in this round for a few reasons A- It shows that "whites" are not afraid to commit murder, destroying the "innocent" look the opponent tries to give themB- Most murders happen within races RefutationYou can look to all my previous responses but also to their source Wkipedia considers themselves unreliable: (. http://en.wikipedia.org...)Wikipedia is not considered a credible source. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from freshman students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything. However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable, because Wikipedia is not considered a credible or authoritative source. Impacts:A- All the oppents sources are from wikipedia, inorder for them to be considered valid in today's round he needs to site the actual source B- He/she is destroying the academic nature of this debateC- I site all sources from the original place or organ and use governmental or respected publishers I look forward to a great debate