Kate Middleton is not a good role model

My opponent continues with the same line of logic that she had in the previous round. Extend out my responses that where my opponent says that she hasn't done anything and wasn't anything special before, but that's exactly what makes her special: she was a nobody before and because she just stayed true to herself she was able to attract the attention of royalty. This fulfills the classic "peasant to princess' dream, thus making her a good role model for people to look up to. Extend out the other response I made that says that even if my opponent is right, that the only way to prove if someone were a "good" role model is to impose some sort of objective standard as to what makes someone a good role model and what doesn't make someone a good role model. Since such standard doesn't exist, a belief in a role model is an inherently subjective affair. Even if my opponent doesn't consider her a good role model for her life, that doens't mean that Kate can't be a good role model for someone else. This means that even if my opponent is right in her beliefs, Kate would still probably be a good role model, and you vote con.I could end my round here since that basically covers everything and she never really responded to any of it, but I want to address my opponent's arguments a little further to address some of the internal logic her arguments use. I want to start where she's criticizing Kate from going from a size 10 to a smaller size in two months after her pregnancy, and using that to say that she's not a good role model. I have two responses to this:First, weight loss is an actual serious concern among different people, and they can look to Kate's success as a reason to keep trying to lose weight. An article in 2010 reported(1) that 70% of Americans are concerned about their weight and 77% of Americans are actually trying to reduce their weight. Those people who are actively trying to lose weight can look to Kate's success and use that as motivation to keep going (i.e. "if she can do it then why can't I?") My opponent may bring up the point of "Well she dropped it way too fast and that's not healthy!" This only leads me to my second point:Second, whether or not her weight loss was "healthy" or not is irrelevant to her being a good role model to those who are looking to lose weight. Again, since people choosing their role model is inherently subjective, your reasons for why she isn't a good role model may/will not be shared by everyone. The mere fact this debate exists right now is testement that your reasoning isn't shared by everyone. So even if you're right, that doesn't mean that Kate's a poor role model. The second point I want to address is what Pro's ideal role model looks like, which is the story of Malala Yousafzai. I'm glad to hear that, on a personal level, but that doens't make her an objectively good role model. I could say that it sends a bad message to people saying that they aren't really doing anything unless they're getting shot in the face for standing up for their beliefs, thus her example would only serve to increase violence and gunshot victims (particularly to the face), and thus not view her as a role model. I wouldn't be entirely wrong either, because why we value someone as a role model is inherently subjective, from person to person. Clearly the people who shot her in the face didn't think she was a good role model. To summarize my arguments thus far:1. Kate fulfills the "peasant to princess" fantasy which serves as a role model for others to look up to to prove that even if you come from a normal family, you can still be someone special.2. Kate serves as a role model to those who are trying to lose weight.3. Even if my opponent doesn't find reason to consider her a role model, that doesn't mean that others can't, since valuing someone as a role model is inherently subjective, meaning that to those who value her highly she can still be a role model.