We should go to the park together

Con: "I'm married, thus I don't make it a habit of going to the park with strange men by myself." Under "Relationship" on Con's profile, Con has chosen to not answer. This is an indication of a lack of black and white "my husband only" mentality. I assume Con may be into swinging or being premiscuous in her action. Con looks to have secular beliefs/lack of beliefs, thus "cheating on your husband" or "getting around on the side" is not neccessarily "immoral". It's simply a biologically driven choice stimulated by electrical signals interpreted by the brain. If Con cheats or gets around, Con has not done anything damning or wrong if Con chooses to associate her "morality" in another way. Examples? Homosexuals do not deem homosexuality as "wrong". Muslims do not deem multiple wives as "wrong". Thus, Con may not deem meeting bronto at the park as "wrong". If others disagree with Con going to meet bronto at the park well... "Let them grumble; that is how it is going to be." -- Anne Boelyn * There is a reason that women love romance novels. There are, however, more women in America today reading romance novels." These women, half married and half single, support the billion dollar industry, according to the Houston-based nonprofit, Romance Writers of America (RWA)." Psychologist Dr. Julia Slattery, author of Finding the Hero in Your Husband, says there are similarities between what happens to a woman when she reads a romance novel and what happens to a man when he views pornography. There is a neurochemical element with men and visual porn, but an emotional element with women and these novels," she writes. http://acculturated.com... The point? If bronto were to strike the right emotion with Con, she would be heavily biologically persuaded to go to the park with bronto. Attraction is not a choice, and this emotional connection would put Con and bronto in a biological quantum entanglement, if you will. Con would have no divine or spiritual reason to not "cheat" or be "adventurous" being an Atheist. She would make the rules that she feels apply. * Con: "There are also other things I could do with my time including make money, have sex, or do something that I definitively and wholeheartedly enjoy." By this statement Con is using a freudian slip. Con mentions sex to bronto, a complete stranger, releasing her true, subconscious desires. * Con: "For example, I know he appears to be conservative which is very off-putting. I can assume that we would not have a lot in common to talk about or experience pleasurably together." I do not list myself as Conservative on my profile because I am not. I can even provide examples: In this debate, I do not condemn homosexuals or the LGBT community and even offer support for the victims of the Orlando shooting. Why? I have no right to judge when I myself fall short. http://www.debate.org... In this thread that I created, I want a Moderate party started. http://www.debate.org... In this thread, I suggested voting for Hillary if certain things happened. http://www.debate.org... And...when I engaged Con on Barack Obama recently, we both agreed that he wasn't the greatest. When she posed her thoughts on Trump I engaged her politely and did not challenge her assessment, but listened to her, even referring to her opinion as "interesting". Con: "I don't like Obama. I didn't vote for Obama. And Obama will be gone soon anyway." www.debate.org/forums/politics/topic/90174 On post #16, Con accuses me of possibly being a Libertarian. * Con: "going to the park with a strange man" Con called me strange. Conduct Pro. :-) * Con: "which exhausts valuable resources" Not if Pro covered the costs or did the traveling. * Con: "Conflict encourages hostility, tension, resentment and potentially violence." And in reality, sexual tension, which causes better, more passionate sexual encounters according to experts. http://www.artofflirting.com... --- (Video example:) http://youtu.be... --- Con: "I can also assume that Pro wouldn't approve of my friends, lifestyle, individual traits or values." I doubt it. I'm not a man who claims any moral highground on others. Challenging, sassy, and fun? I am. * Con: "Attending the park with Pro might also induce in me a Fear of Missing Out or FoMO" Or, it "might" be: -Intoxicating -Passionate -Inspiring -Magical -Intellectually stimulating -Exciting -Wonderful -Romantic -Dreamy -Satisfying http://www.psychology-solution.com...