Because there are Nonbelievers, God does not exist.

I specifically stated that when I bring up the word "God", I am referring to the Christian god." -Besides the fact that this is not your premise, which is "the existence of non-believers nullifies the existence of God", you did not define "Christian", "God", nor did you present any Christian theology, claim to be a Christian theologist, claim to believe in Christian theology, nor can you explain the differences between a "Christian God" and any other "god" which would be considered the one true Creator God- which happens to be the "Christian" God according to their beliefs. Because the "Christian" God is the same God as that of all Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and all their sects, denominations, and schools of thought)(http://www.pbs.org...), and Abraham's God is the same God as the creator God in all religions existing prior to Judaism (Babylon, Egypt, etc.), it is necessary to approach the argument of the existence of God from a practical and realistic point of view rather than from a pigeonholed definition you created within your argument, and from your point of view. This is me arguing against you, and we must do so from our respective points of view, and not from that of others though we must reference others in order to get our points across, and/or lend credibility and scholarly reflection to our ideas. Christians believe their God was before any other god (Revelation 1: 8), and all other 'gods' are either false gods or lesser creations worshipped as God (Exodus 20:3). Islam teaches this(Sura 112:1-4), so does Judaism(Exodus 20:3). The religion of Babylon, which can be argued is the origin of all other religions, also has one Creator God (http://en.wikipedia.org...), and all others are beneath him and created by him. Egyptian mythology was based on the religion of Babylon, and Egypt is the home of monotheism. Akhenaten assigned the Aten as the one true Creator God, and the Hebrews were integral members of Egyptian society from around the time of Akhenaten to the time of Jesus. Because societies affect each others' religions, and Egypt obviously affected the Hebrews, and Judaism is the root of Christianity it is, from a believer's point of view, safe to say that any discussion regarding the existence of "God" would refer to the one true God believed in by all major religions, and not to any lesser 'gods' whom noone cares whether or not they exist as 'beings' let alone 'gods'. "I have listed common characteristics attributed to God, and shown through passage that he wishes for all of mankind to be saved. (1 Timothy 2:4)." -You did so without providing a definition of what it means for you to be saved, nor did you claim to adhere to this belief. Neither have I. How is this verse relevant to our discussion? It's not. "If my opponent can show how the Christian god is not purported to be all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving, then I would be glad to hear so." -The attributes of God are not essential to my argument that he exists. They are essential to YOUR argument. YOU argue those points. "1. I have already stated the attribute, omnibenevolence. Benevolence being altruism or kindness." -You've stated this, but have not addressed how it relates to your argument. I can't argue against something that is not explained, or a point that is not made. What is your point? "2. Exactly what does my opponent mean by "perfect science"? " -Perfect science is the state of the laws of science regardless of our knowledge about them. It is the science that is indisputable, like perfect math (10/10=1). Science that is indisputable would amount to, say, the Earth revolves around the Sun. This is science that is not logically disputable, yet in the past it was disputed by those who had no knowledge of science. It was not only disputed, but it was condemned as heresy. Again, if perfect science can be questioned, not believed, and condemned as heresy so can the existence of God. The fact that non-believers exist does not nullify the existence of God. "4. Based on Christian doctrines and passages, God is presented to be all-loving. If you have any disputes with this, you should be arguing with the Christian theologians, not me." -Again, you are making statements and claiming they are Christian doctrines, implying these doctrines are essential to your argument, you also imply you don't believe these doctrines, then you want me to argue with the Christian theologians? They are not the ones claiming God does not exist because non-believers exist. You do not provide a definition, and I am sure you are beyond understanding, of "all-loving". Just as you misunderstood "perfect science"- which I assert are one and the same. To be all loving is to be perfectly fair, balanced, and neutral. Gods laws are natural and scientific and cannot be overridden, broken, altered, or undone. You provide no argument against your own assertion- that God is all-loving according to Christian theology. I assert- God is all-loving in that his laws, the laws of science and nature, are fair, balanced, neutral, and apply to all creation. "5. The laws of science are human inventions" -The laws of science are human DISCOVERIES, not inventions . Newton didn't "invent" the fact that every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it. It's common sense, but it's a law of science and he wrote it, but he did not "invent" it- he discovered it and verbalized what he observed. You are absolutely right that the analytical statements are not 100% infallible, but they are written according to observation and not absolute knowledge. The laws of science as known to us would not be 100% at harmony with the laws of science as known to God, but that does not nullify the fact that these laws do exist. Planck's constant, the speed of light, inertia, electromagnetic, chemical, and all physical laws are analytical statements, some with empirical constants. You cannot "break" the speed of light. You can change it's speed by forcing light through different mediums, but the speed is always constant through different mediums, ie. water, glass, quartz, etc. In other words, light will always travel at about 186,282.397 miles per second as long as it is in a vacuum. (http://www.math.ucr.edu...) "My opponent has missed the entire point of this debate, that it was a debate targeted towards the Christian god and not theology in whole. This is a strong reason to vote for Pro unless he resolves this issue." -My opponent is unhappy that he was not able to manipulate this debate into the box he wanted it to fit into. The truth is that Theology does not fit into a little box called "Christianity". As a matter of fact, CHRISTIANITY doesn't fit into a little box called "Christianity"! Catholic Theology differs from Baptist, Baptist Theology differs slightly from Pentecostal, Pentecostal Theology differs from Methodist, etc. We are not arguing theology. We are not arguing the correctness of Christian texts, their truthfulness, or whether or not Christianity "teaches" the attributes of God with veracity. What we are debating is whether or not the existence of non-believers negates the existence of God. I assert that even mere ignorance can be cause for non-belief, and therefore the existence of non-believers does not prove the non-existence of ANYTHING, let alone God.