Gun control will make places safer

I am not good at these type of debates but I will try I would like to say after the Connecticut shooting we all became more silent then ever after the tragedy and had nothing to say about guns. People are saying the right to bear arms and to defend themselves. Here is the consequences of keeping a firearm in you household and how gun control would be able to help. - Keeping a fire arm in your household can increase a risk of highly shootings heres some links to support it. www.baynews9.com/.../2013/11/6/deputies_9_year_old_.html?hpt=ju_bn4 nytimes.com/2012/12/16/nyregion/friends-of-gunmans-mother-his-first... The reason it is able to increase highly shootings because showed in both links the 9 year old in hills burg brought a gun to his elementary school and his father had guns in his own house hold. There was no injuries but the boy got arrested. Another thing I found on the link is that a 11 year child brought a gun to school and when he brought it he said he was using it for self defense. And you give the second amendment to give rights for a child to bring guns to school? And of course he was arrested because of the possession of a firearm which was one of the laws in U.S. Nancy Lanza had many guns in her house but looked what has happened to a school in possession of firearms. The only people I would say the second amendment goes to is people like cops and people in the armies -Gun control decreased crime * Before you all shout you don't believe me I would like to say that I will give you many examples of things that support with two links http://www.digitaljournal.com... http://answers.yahoo.com... In my link Japan has stricter gun laws and crime and homicide rate is very low. Just like I said if the second amendment is right and gun control sucks how come in Japan the crime rate is low then U.S.A? And gun control is to stop all assault weapons like really citizens don't need ak-47 to protect themselves so it really makes no sense to state that gun control sucks because you ban all guns.NO!! we are saying this so there will be less gun victims and less homicide and so gun related crime could decrease. And Europe has less crime and it is more safer because of the law enforcements of guns. Rebuttal :You state in the intro with gun control people are able to still hold a gun Sorry to say it to you but it will be hard for criminal to obtain guns I would like to say because there will be many back round checks and if you think outlawing guns will not do anything and they can still get them on black markets they wont be able to because in the book Auticity of Hope by Obama or if that's what it is called on the chapter for page 383 he tries to make a plan to get rid of black markets. Rebuttal 2 Like I said the second amendment goes for cops and military because a boy states he defends himself with a gun and brings to school a eleven year old and watch what happens he got arrested. Do you think he should not have got arrested just because of the amendment? Exactly and Nancy Lanza had guns to protect herself and she was a gun addict but what happens is her son brings it school and shoot 20 children. The second amendment should be more stricter. Conclusion Guns are programed to kill and with one single bullet a life is gone and there is no way to bring that person back. Antiq Hennis only lived 1 year and died in his stroller just because of a gun shot that was missed I am waiting for my opponent to give his opening argument, but I will thank him for his effort in his argument A free video http://www.dailymotion.com...