Evelution vs Young Earth Creationism

You may use any source you would like. It does not matter to me. Disproving the Yung Earth. Most Young Earth Creationist argue that the earth and universe is only 6,000-10,000 years old. If this were true how can we see stars that are further than 6,000-10,000 light years away? The farthest star away that we can see is around 13 billion light years away[1]. As we know a light year is a measurement of distance, not time. A light year is the distance light can travel in one year[2]. Knowing this how can it be possible that Earth is less than 13 billion years old? A second argument against a young earth is the Quaking Aspen colony in Fish Lake National Forest in Utah.[3] This tree colony is the oldest living thing on the planet. Each individual tree is 200 years old; however the root system is 80,000 years old[4]. If the Earth was only 10,000 years old how can this tree have a root system of 80,000 years old? A third argument would be humans. The oldest human fossil found is about 160,000 years old[5]. On top of that the oldest evidence of civilization goes back 80,000 years in Africa[6]. Know that humans were around 160,00 years ago and the first civilization came into existence 80,000 years ago would disprove that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old. Fourth and final argument to disprove that we live on a young earth is that the radioactive dating of meteorites date the planet to be about 4.5 billion years. Yes it is true that we can not directly measure core samples of the Earth, but we know that the Earth formed at the same time as the rest of the Solar System[7]. Knowing this we can radioactive date meteorites that have struck the earth and that works out to be about 4.5 billion years[8] Proving Evolution The first argument for evolution is DNA. Every living thing on the planet is composed of cells and those cells contain DNA[1]. This would strongly suggest that we came from a single source. DNA can be used to see how two different species are related to each other[2]. Just about all organisms use the same nucleic acid to make up there DNA which would suggest the existence of a single ancestor[3]. The Next argument for evolution is the fossil record. The fossil record shows us that the fossilized remains of simplistic organisms are in the oldest rock layers, and as you move in to the newer rock layers you can see a gradual change in to more complex organisms[4] [5]. Third argument for evolution is the existence of drug resistant organisms such as MRSA. MRSA evolved from S. aureus threw natural selection to be resistant to many different drugs[6]. The fact that the idea of a young Earth is completely disproved by science and that fact that DNA, the fossil record, and the fact that we can observe evolution proves that Evolution is a better explanation for the origins of modern day species. [1] http://www.evolutionfaq.com... [2] http://wiki.answers.com... [3] http://wiki.answers.com... [4] http://www.evolutionfaq.com... [5] http://www.evolutionfaq.com... [6] http://evolution.berkeley.edu... [1] http://www.dailymail.co.uk... [2] http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov... [3] http://www.youtube.com... [4] http://www.youtube.com... [5] http://news.nationalgeographic.com... [6] http://www.livescience.com... [7] http://www.youtube.com... [8] http://www.youtube.com...