Islam Is The True Religion

Propositions on (1) Definition:1. Islam must be defined as a "monotheistic religion" which is based upon the Quran1.1 "True" must be defined as wholly true; if I say "I am justice, freedom, and prosperity" but I prove to the world that I am not justice, I may be "freedom and prosperity" but the whole proposition is still false.1.2 "Religion" must be defined as "the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods."Corollary The opponent henceforth must proves that Islam is the "true religion" by demonstrating that Islam is infallible.Propositions on (2) Circular Logic and other Fallacies2. "The Bible has changed my life, because God became clear to me" is a fallacy of personal evidence; it's sophist logic is based upon the assumption that man never lies, which is clearly a false statement. 2.1 "Islam is a true religion because the Quran" is a circular logical argument; for Islam to be "the true religion" every teaching of it, every statement it says, and every verse of it (and the Quran) can be interpreted as true; but what qualities does a true religion have? A true religion encourages men to seek the truth; a false one requires men to have faith in the book and not belief. For example, Buddhism teaches men to be good, but at the same time, it does not require overt faith to be a Buddhist; there is no fanciful and almost fictional "creation" stories under Buddhism, but just theories about the nature of man and man's existence.Propositions on (3) On Fallacies of IslamAxiom A. The true religion is infallible. 3. No religion is infallible, Islam included, for religion is simply the mass-following of a metaphysical view of being of a great monotheistic philosopher.3.1 But the books of religion, which show how to follow that religion, requires a reawakening in order to read it; as it is clear that humans of that period are as gullible, if not more, than us ourselves.3.2 (Fallacies on Human Production) But the first fallacy one must look at in Islam is found in the Koran, Sura 23:12-14: And certainly did We create man from an extract of clay. (23:12) Then We placed him as a sperm-drop in a firm lodging. (23:13) Then We made the sperm-drop into a clinging clot, and We made the clot into a lump [of flesh], and We made [from] the lump, bones, and We covered the bones with flesh; then We developed him into another creation. So blessed is Allah , the best of creators. (23:14) 3.21 For the resolution proposes that every word of Islam is true; but Sura 23:12-14 proposes a new story; that whatever Islam proposes, is true. However, this is not what real sciences have found; for real and physical sciences has found out that the female, in fact, play more part than the male in the creation of the baby. The sperm, in reality, fertilizes the egg which allows the father's chromosomes and DNA to unite with that of the mothers', and therefore creating a "child fetus"3.212 Apart from this, before we go onto more scientific fallacies, we must also point out another fallacy; the Quran bases its fundamental postulates upon the work of Galen, which states that "sperm" comes from the joint between the loins and the ribs, when it is MORE THAN CLEAR that the sperm originates from testicles.Corollary Henceforth it is more than clear that the Quran presents us with false propositions on the generation of animals, men and life. If Islam was the true religion, then it would be more than clear that the Quran would not be based on false facts.3.3 (Fallacies on the Functioning of the Earth) The Quran proposes that the rain is the process of the heavens. Yusufali 2:22 states: "Who has made the earth your couch, and the heavens your canopy; and sent down rain from the heavens?"3.31 But anyone with enough logic, and education in these fields, can tell you that rain is because of a cycle that earth has created; the water cycle. Rain is not magic so to say; rain is made by the earth, and no philosophical proof could overshadow the fact that the water cycle exists, and is now working either below, above, or in the limits, of the equilibrium that it works on.3.32 But more fallacies on the functioning of the earth can be observed; there was a time when Imams would offer a Fatwa for killing those who thought that the earth was round. Koran V.20:53 states that:"He Who has, made for you the earth like a carpet spread out; has enabled you to go about therein by roads (and channels); and has sent down water from the sky." With it have We produced diverse pairs of plants each separate from the others."Earth is clearly not flat; if the opponent needs to circumnavigate the world to see, let him do so. But it is not of my interest to show a already too clear fact; that Islam has created many fallacies on the world, and its function/form is already too clear.Corollary: Islam is fallible, but how can a true religion be fallible?3.4 (Fallacies in Astronomy and Cosmology) Islam teaches that the sky is the cover to our universe; that it is a canopy. Quran 31:10:"He hath created the heavens (Skies) without supports (pillars) that ye can see, and hath cast into the earth firm Mountains/Hills, so that it quake not with you; and He hath dispersed…"But modern cosmology has proven to the world that the earth is not merely a home, and the sky the roof, but that the sky is a reflection of the outside universe.∴ The True Religion is Infallible, whilst islam is riddled with mistakes.Propositions on (4) on the Existence of God4.1 Islam is based upon the assumption that God exists; and indeed, it would require heaps of proof to suggest that God exists. Albeit via Russel's Teapot, the opponent has the burden to prove that God exists, I shall assume that this resolution already has that assumption in it.4.2 Arguments against God existence vary, but there shall be three employed here; if anything, this proves that there is no "true" religion. The first argument against God derives from (a) spontaneous generation, another arises from an argument against Body-Mind Dualism (b), and last one arises from Morality (c)4.3 The arguments from spontaneous generation (a) is easy; nothing can just "poof" out in the world; i.e humans cannot be effectively created out of nowhere, since the creation of the world, due to natural laws. Albeit it can be said that "God is omnipotent" it must be said that "if God can create a law so strong that even he cannot violate it" he cannot be omnipotent. God can; he has created the world, and the laws of the world he cannot break. Nevertheless, this may be demonstrated as a circular argument; but can God create a Wall so strong that even he cannot break? Yes, he can. Henceforth God is not omnipotent; but there is a greater dillema. If God is not omnipotent, then can he break natural laws? If he did so, the earth would be destroyed, as the violation of natural physical laws against spontaneous generation would do so.Nevertheless, this argument is best expressed in proposition-conclusion forms:1. Spontaneous Generation is impossible2. God created men spontaenously3. It is impossible for God to create men spontaneously4. If God didn't create men spontaneously, then he is not the God of Monotheism5. The God of Monotheism does not exist∴ If the God of Islam does not exist due to these factors, then it would be impossible for Islam to be the religion of truth.4.4 The arguments from the body-mind problem presents a more clear but still an inductive path against this idea of a monotheistic God. But this argument shall show how the soul cannot exist without the body; let us take for example the question of the soul. If the soul exists, then whatever the body does to it, the soul cannot be effected, as the soul is merely an object, a non-physical one, that exists within our brains, which seat the soul. However, when a person receives damage from the brain, his "soul" changes. He turns from a normal calm person into a short-tempered angered person; such was the case of Phineas Gage, a worker who suffered a damaged brain.4.41 A further problem for Dualism is the problem of "casual interaction" or how brains form consciousness. If the soul exists, then one must find an explanation for the unification of the mind and the body; for how can a immaterial object even control a material object? Apart from this, arguments from biological development states that "how can a man" be controlled by an immaterial object when his existence is material? 4.42 Apart from this, all things that exist, exist physically, or if does not exist physically, there must be definite proof for it; there is barely any definite proof from neurology/psychology of the existence of such an immaterial dialogue.Corollary: If the soul does not exist, then a supernatural world (which one calls the Kingdom of God) cannot exist, as the supernatural world is the world of the immaterial souls. If a supernatural world is non existent, then God does not exist. If God does not exist, then Islam is not the true religion.4.5 Arguments from morality states that men were born into a state of tabula rasa. Although this may be neurologically disproven, men are indeed in tabula rasa about morality; for if the monotheistic God is all good, he would have created humans good. However, humans can be bad; but on a higher note, there is no objective morality. Even in some societies before the 19th century, especially in Hawaii, the intercourse of siblings was still not considered a taboo. God would have created men with perfectly objective morality, but he hasn't; but he is all good. Henceforth, we can only conclude that the Islamic God does not exist.RESOLUTION IS NEGATEDCitations:Quran References: http://quran.com...