Philippines should run under One ruler

A: "It doesn't need to be a leader that kills, we need a leader that leads. Although, I don't care about the killings, as long as they kill the squatters, rapists, murderers and any person that doesn't obey the rules. I mean would you protect this people?" 1. In a dictatorship government, the single ruler chooses the rules. So, they will kill everyone who does not obey what the dictator thinks. This means: P1. The dictator is deciding by himself. P2. The opinions of the people are not considered. C. What the dictator wants is not always what the people want. So, the ruler could to choose to kill the people of a specific race/religion, because the dictator/ruler just doesn't agree with their opinions. This would cause: Chaos, hate towards the dictator, mass deaths, etc. 2. "As long as they kill the squatters, rapists, murderers and any person that doesn't obey the rules." The problem is, the single ruler chooses the rules! Anyways, to point 2. "The Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. "Holocaust" is a word of Greek origin meaning "sacrifice by fire." The Nazis, who came to power in Germany in January 1933, believed that Germans were "racially superior" and that the Jews, deemed "inferior," were an alien threat to the so-called German racial community. In the early years of the Nazi regime, the National Socialist government established concentration camps to detain real and imagined political and ideological opponents. Increasingly in the years before the outbreak of war, SS and police officials incarcerated Jews, Roma, and other victims of ethnic and racial hatred in these camps."[1] Exactly how is this killing the bad guys? Do you think what Adolf Hitler did should be done in the Philippines? B: "Having a one leader makes a country prosper. Corruption is inevitable for government officials, so instead of having a dump load of these so called officials, why don't we just have a one ruler. You wouldn't have to worry about the amount of embezzled money if you only have one leader, instead of having so many sharks in the bay." Lets read that again.. "Corruption is inevitable for government officials." This means that the dictator (single ruler) could be, inevitably, corrupt, and this does not cause the country to prosper. P1. Government officials could be corrupt. P2. The dictator is a government official. C. The dictator could be corrupt. C. "Hitler proposes to conquer other countries, hence, creating superhumans, hence, killing millions of people (eliminating weak people)." Eliminating "weak" people. Hmm... sounds like racism, the key driver of the holocaust. Plus, although Hitler did conquer countries, most of the people he killed were due to Hitler hating Jews, Romas, etc (Racism). This in turn did not create "superhumans", but a bloody genocide. Plus, you said this, (the weaker people should be killed) then you said only squatters, rapists and unlawful people, which is self-contradicting because weaker people are not unlawful. (Unless a ruthless dictator says that weak people should be killed.) Also, with this logic, you can also say: P1. Joe is better than Bob. C. Bob should be killed. This logic above is clearly flawed. [1]http://www.ushmm.org...