All Else Being the Same, a Moral Position in War is Untenable

I thank CON for an organized response. As CON's round is brief, I will address it line-by-line (CON's arguments in italics):Counter-MovesRebuttal #1 (R1)CON:- NationA declare Urgency, such that:> Every civilian & militant of every city is inserted into bankers invisible to NationB.> The bankers are a anti-nuclear web of cities under the surface that are fully operational, will sufficient nuclear supply for energy.> The bankers contain fully equipped & operational military bases.a) I remind CON that per round #1, perfect ISR is in effect:"For the purposes of this debate, both nations have perfect ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) and are able to locate every military unit and every civilian at all times for both sides. Therefore, neither side can say "I didn't know!" if civilians die."b) If CON's "anti-nuclear web of cities" constitutes an evacuation of his capital, then we will occupy his capital and win this war without a single shot being fired.c) If CON's "anti-nuclear web of cities" IS his capital, then CON will have to demonstrate how a de-facto bomb shelter can house a civilian population for any significant length of time. As it is, such shelters are easy to cut off from the rest of the world, and if that shelter is not fully self-sufficient, it will be synonymous to a mass grave during a nuclear war. If this shelter IS NationA's capital, then NationB will cut it off from the surface through bunker-buster bombs or by discharging underground nuclear devices and wait for it to die off. We know of all the access routes into and out of this underground city (again, perfect ISR), so cutting it off will be an easy process.R2)CON:- NationA will then declare its Surrender to NationB, in due time (at mid night), with the following promises:> NationA shall not order the killing of any citizen.> NationA puts immediately into effect death penalty to anyone who kills a citizen.> NationA agrees to hand over to NationB any militant who infringes these decrees.a) If NationA surrenders, NationB wins outright and this scenario ends with a PRO victory. After surrender, NationB can then dictate any terms to NationA, including the complete and utter destruction of NationA's citizenry if it so chooses. NationA has forfeited the chance to challenge this outcome, as that is exactly what war is - a challenge to an entity's ability to exist (Sun Zi's Art of War chapter 1 first page https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au...)- and NationA has lost the war.b) If NationA cannot kill any civilian, NationA cannot institute the death penalty, as that necessarily involves killing a civilian.R3)CON:- In the mean time, before mid-night:> NationA, having built tunnels under NationB too, drafts & deploys most of its Military resources under the surface throughout NationB.> NationA launches the already set traps all over its territory, in case NationB dares to invade.Given perfect ISR, NationB is fully aware of these attempts before they are executed, and will drill, bomb, and nuke such tunnels at their entry point. NationA cannot resist our efforts, as nukes will penetrate missile defense, and any conventional delivery platforms (bombers, essentially) will have civilians in them, i.e. NationA cannot shoot them down.R4)CON:- NationA makes a surprise attack on NationB, I repeat it’s a surprise attack, & thus they weren’t aware of it, since they are all under the surface:> NationA bombards from down the surface all the borders of the 32 territory boxes of NationB, & thus hinders al possible ground based military movements from one box to another.> NationA launches from all these borders a mass deep sleep inducing gas all over NationB’s territory.> NationA then orders the capture of all the people in command of NationB, some will be.> NationA orders the capture of all militants in sight, even at the cost of life.This is the same as CON's R3 response of digging tunnels.R5)CON:- NationA’s elite force goes rogue, & kills all NationB’s commanding personnel, & thus deserves the death penalty for their action by the decree of NationA.- At midnight, NationA announces their surrender, & cuts all communications with NationB.SOFs (special operation forces) rely upon evading ISR to be effective...as this scenario involves perfect ISR, SOFs are just soldiers with more slightly muscle and better weaponry. They will not have the ability to infiltrate deep into NationB's territory without being destroyed first. Our command personnel are also embedded with civilian personnel, so bombing/nuking them would violate NationA's moral position.ConclusionMost of CON's case relies upon taking advantage of imperfect ISR. That's not how this scenario was structured, which renders most of CON's case invalid. As it is, CON has surrendered. The moment he does, PRO wins and this debate is over.