Cin is good looking

Cin attempts to apply another definition of 'Beauty.' She adds a valid definition from a valid website. However my definition is also valid and the website she provided includes this definition as well. Beauty: "the quality present in a thing or person that gives intense pleasure or deep satisfaction to the mind" - http://dictionary.reference.com... This definition is similar to the one I provided. Beauty is described as the quality that gives pleasure or satisfaction to the human mind. And this definition is more specific than the definition she gives. Beauty is not just "a very attractive and well-formed girl or woman". That is a very narrow definition that cannot be applied to men, animals, objects and ideas. The definition provided in my own and even Cin's source is more commonly applicable, therefore it is the definition we should stick to.Here is the premise and conclusion again:P1: That which has a quality of beauty can be considered beautiful.P2: Cin has at least one quality of beauty.C1: Cin is beautiful.Cin has chosen to attack P2. These are my rebuttals:"Taking this into mind, beauty is the physical appearance of a person."Not neccessarily. There can be beauty in the abilities of a person, the charisma of a person, or in other inherent qualities/attributes of a person. Again, your definition is narrow."And referring back to previous times, I have never been an attractive person. I usually get "oh, she has a great personality, but I wouldn't date her." Again, not everyone will think you're attractive but then again, not everyone will think you're not. Physical attractiveness depends on the human observer. It is subjective. Your belief is based on the opinions of a few people and is not empirically true. "Not to mention constantly being at the bottom of the "hot list" that the popular guys make. "The opinions of a small group of people can hardly prove a fact compared to the opinions of the entire human population. Why choose to buy into the beliefs of a small collective at your school and not buy into your own positive beliefs? Their opinions have absolutely NOTHING to do with you. It's like if you were suddenly transferred to a school where all the 'popular' guys started telling you,"I absolutely hate the colour of your hair. I wish it was rainbow coloured," you wouldn't buy into their opinion, you would just look at them like you couldn't care less. This belief you have adopted from the beliefs of your peers holds no real empirical truth. Again, physical attractiveness depends on the observer, it is subjective."The complaints of physical appearance, or the "ideal" features of a girl to be attractive this day and age would be of model appearance, like Selena Gomez."This perception is false. Selena Gomez is not attractive to everyone and there are no objective "ideal" features of a girl. "I am either too short (I'm 5 flat), not skinny enough (I am 111 lbs), I don't wear "revealing" clothes, and on... But I'm not going to wear tight jeans or shirts in order to impress the stupid h0rny guys. Because I am comfortable with how I look, dress and act."Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems the point Cin is making here is that girls who are below 5 foot, heavier than 100 lbs, and don't wear revealing clothing are unattractive? Again there seems to be another narrow definition that Con is buying into."I do get that I have an amazing personality. I also get that I'm really nerdy. Which is true, because I am top of my class right now. But even saying that, doesn't necessarily mean that having a great personality is found to be attractive. In order to date someone, there has to be a physical attraction between them. Finding someone with a great personality is just a small part of the term "beauty"."THis is another extremely narrow definition that Cin has adopted. She pre-assumes the reasons people date and form relationships. She pre-assumes the need for there to be physical attraction in order for somone to date. If people truly needed this requirement in order to date, the human population would tumble. My parents have admitted that they are both not very physically attractive but still love each other because of each other's great and unique personalities and traits. Great personality pleases the human mind and this is a quality of Beauty. Cin's definition of what is 'beautiful' to the human mind is too narrow. She asserts that great personality is just a small part of the quality of beauty. Yhis does not make any sense. It does not apply to other things like movies, art, and music. With a definition like the one Con asserts, I cannot say that my favourite music is beautiful because its soothing melody is just a small part of the term "beautiful". And I can't describe a painting as beautiful because one of the special qualities it has, it's tone of colour, is insufficient in describing it's beauty.As you can see, her definition makes no sense. It is because of the special quality that an object or person has, that I am able to describe the person or object as "beautiful."In conclusion, Cin's definitions are too narrow. She asserts and pre-assumes things that are not empirically true. My premise and conclusion still stand strong. Cin is indeed beautiful ;)