The "one way to heaven" doctrine is wrong

1.God will not send someone to hell because they never heard of Jesus. Ezekiel 3:18: "When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou give him not warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at your hand." Ezekiel 33:6: "But if the watchman sees the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand." According to God, the blame for someone not repenting, if they are not warned to, is on the hands of the person who was told to tell them, but did not, which is in this case the Christians who were told to spread the good news, so God will not judge them, he will judge the Christians who can go out to Africa and Asia, and would have told those people if they had gone, but did not. Additionally, the pastors who teach this message are also accountable, because the vast majority of Christians never heard about Jesus the messiah; the son of god, they only heard about Jesus the chauvinistic Jerk, who is not the messiah. 2.There is a way to be saved aside from Jesus. God allowed a way for sins to be forgiven aside from Jesus in the Old Testament, do you believe that it is beyond his capability now, do you believe that he would decide that way for salvation then, but change his mind now, or is he the same yesterday today and tomorrow. Do you believe that it is beyond his capability to save them? Matthew 19:26: "And looking at them Jesus said to them, "With people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible." Genesis 18:14: "Is anything too difficult for the LORD? At the appointed time I will return to you, at this time next year, and Sarah will have a son." 3.God wants all to be saved, 2nd Peter 3:9: "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." That is his purpose, Job 42:1-2: "Then Job answered the LORD and said, "I know that you can do all things, And that no purpose of yours can be thwarted." So if God has a purpose of his, being that all should be saved, and no purpose of his can be thwarted, don't you think he will make it so? 4.God provided a way for forgiveness in the Old Testament, Leviticus 5:10: "And he shall offer the second for a burnt offering, according to the manner: and the priest shall make atonement for him for his sin which he hath sinned, and it shall be forgiven him." 5.3. God provided a way for forgiveness in the Old Testament, Leviticus 5:10: "And he shall offer the second for a burnt offering, according to the manner: and the priest shall make atonement for him for his sin which he hath sinned, and it shall be forgiven him." And no one, not even God, can reverse what he said, Isaiah 43:13: "Even from eternity I am He, and there is none who can deliver out of My hand; I act and who can reverse it?" And if he can, then how is Jesus being the only way to salvation any different from the way to salvation provided previously? Either this way is closed, in which case God can amend the ways he provides, in which case he can allow people to be saved aside from Jesus, or he cannot, in which case this way is still open, Leviticus 2: 1: "When anyone offers a grain offering to the LORD, his offering shall be of fine flour. And he shall pour oil on it, and put frankincense on it." Offering wheat to God can also atone for sins, Matthew 25:40: "And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me." So giving wheat to the poor is just as good as giving it to God, which can atone for a sin, so if someone feeds the poor, they are saved. 6.The name of Jesus cannot save you, The name of Jesus is just a name, and his name was not even Jesus, it was Joshua. Do you have any idea how many Joshua's there are? So it would follow logically, that because the Sikhists (East Indian Monotheists) believe in God and the son of God, they are saved, even if they do not know his name being Jesus, because it is not the name that saves you. The name Joshua is just a name, it is Jesus, God, himself, that saves you, the Sikhists God displays all attributes of our God, he is a God of love, he is love as a matter of fact, they believe in his son also, they just do not refer to him as Jesus. Also, the Sikhists belief in God and his son makes them saved, 1st John 4:15-16: "Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwells in him, and he in God." My point being, God does not need Christians to spread the message, he can do it himself can he not? He obviously told the Sikhists about his son and himself, I see no reason why he can"t, is anything too hard for the Lord? Jeremiah 32:27: "Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh; is anything too difficult for me?" The answer is no, nothing is too hard for the lord. 7.It is knowing God that saves you, John 3:16: "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." So whoever knows Jesus, God, is saved, 1st john 4:7-8: "Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loves is born of God, and knows God. He that loves not knows not God; for God is love." Also, 1st John 4:16 says: "And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwells in love dwells in God and God in him." Which means that they are saved, how can God dwell in you and you not be saved