only now is true, now is matter

IntroductionAs of now, my opponent's arguments have been, roughly speaking, unorganized jumbles of utter incoherence. If my opponent would like to continue this debate seriously, I ask him to start trying harder to make his arguments more understandable and organized. Thanks!Rebuttals"i can see dinosour bones with my eyes which is now"Congratulations on your robust sense of sight. "there are not Things in the future and past, Things are true, and the future is always ahead of now"I will provide my definition of 'true' once more, as my opponent doesn't seem to be able to understand the word.true - adjective - beinginaccordancewiththeactualstateorconditions;conformingto realityorfact;notfalse:I can name a number of factual past events/concepts/things that are in "accordance with the actual state or conditions" and are "conforming to reality or fact."1. George Washington was the first President of the United States. http://www.biography.com...2. World War II had millions of casualties.http://www.nationalww2museum.org...3. The triceratops was a dinosaur.http://www.bbc.co.uk...All of the above events/concepts/things were in the past and ARE in accordance with fact, truth, etc. My opponent himself has admitted that "things are true", making it obvious that each of the 'things' mentioned above are of truth. Unless my opponent would like to provide evidence that the above events/concepts/things are NOT in accordance with fact, he must admit that the past is of truth."the past is memory, and there is no matter in my imagination"I agree that the past can be found in one's memory. However, something need not be made of matter in order to be true. The definition of truth itself provides that concepts, ideas, memories, etc. can be true as long as they are in "in accordance with the actual state or conditions.""know negates belief, as i dont have to imagine it. if you are looking at a stone im holding in my hand then i dont have to tell you that i have a stone in my hand"'Know' does not negate 'belief'. Once more, I can both know and believe something (e.g. I am a male, trees are plants, Muslims practice Islam)."knowledge is memory of being now, so the past is "now", ai? memories are from now"As mentioned in the introduction, I can't really understand the incoherent jumble of unorganized phrases that you are supposedly using in this debate. Please specify the meaning of this specific phrase so I can understand and discuss it."experience=now"I'm surprised that you're not already at Harvard with such advanced psychological knowledge like that. Way to go."information is false and truth, and matter is true"Information is actually true if it is in accordance with reality (see the definitions of 'information' and 'true' for more information)."absolute is true even if i have to imagine it, but the informaiton is never true in the sence you think, you can never grab it with your hands, but its true a blind man cant see reality, cause and effect"Something does NOT need to be tangible in order to be real. I don't know why you think that something does need to be tangible to be real - once more, if you simply GLANCE at my definitions for information and true, you could understand EASILY that many concepts, ideas, etc. ARE REAL."4+5=9 in reality"You're a math genius.Conclusion Overall, my opponent has still failed to fulfill his Burden of Proof, as he provides no reasonable/logical evidence or proof for his claims. Meanwhile, I have successfully rebutted each of my opponent's statements. Unless my opponent can defend his statements and provide proof that affirms his contention, I am the winner of this debate.