Atheism- A lost reality! A hopeless, helpless cause!

I shall attempt to not be too condescending, even though the bulk of atheist certainly are to believers. Look the fact is you're running out of time to choose, so it's imperative you snap out of it! So I'll be to the point! Atheism is, in the broadest sense, the absence of belief in the existence of deities. Arguments for atheism range from the philosophical to social and historical approaches. Rationales for not believing in deities include arguments that there is a lack of empirical evidence, the problem of evil; the argument from inconsistent revelations, the rejection of concepts that cannot be falsified, and the argument from non-belief. Although some atheists have adopted secular philosophies (eg. secular humanism), there is no one ideology or set of behaviors to which all atheists adhere. Many atheists hold that atheism is a more parsimonious worldview than theism and therefore that the burden of proof lies not on the atheist to disprove the existence of God but on the theist to provide a rationale for theism. https://en.m.wikipedia.org... At onset the sheer absence of common sense in atheism immediately comes to the forefront of the argument. Stances which when viewed by normally rational person is quite literally "in your face" and yet? To the atheist,they are as invisible as the atom. "Why" is the real question? God, is the answer. Because God makes fools of those who reject Him. This is the fulfilling of this prophecy. Romans 1 21"For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22"Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools How much clearer does it have to be. Bold statement to be sure, "but" is such a statement defensible? I say it can, and is. We shall investigate the evidence together, before the very eyes of all atheist present now or future. Today shall empirical evidence of atheistic irrationality be made manifest. Today, let atheist be not so proud to "BE" atheist as it shall forever be synonymous with "fools" Empirical evidence Merriam-Webster defines this as : :Originating in or based on observation or experience :Relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory :Capable of being verified or disproved by observation or experiment Evidence#1: Lack of common sense and rational thought Atheist do neither. Observe means to watch the religion in action, to observe its running, from within the chosen religion that is being evaluated, right? Any reasoned person can easily see the importance of this? Natural reasoning skills of the most basic, clearly demonstrate that listening to those actually, in and involved in those areas of religion with which lies their interest is both wise and prudent. Nope not to an atheist, he won't self evaluate and won't listen to people in the religion as evidenced by my opponents immediate attack in his acceptence. Irrationality- Can't evaluate a religion if you refuse to experience it. Appropriately evaluating a belief structure from without is impossible .... so atheist do nothing. Once informed of the impending punishment awaiting those who refuse to acknowledge their God, it remains (though not rational, and obviously not intelligent) the right of the offender to choose to NOT seek Him. However for this individual to profess that God does not exist passing oneself off as a person of knowledge of the subject matter, is irresponsible and unconscionable. Evidence# 2 :Lack of common sense and rational thought Experiments To conduct right? Means going into the religion and participate to determine value, effectiveness, credibility... personal experience, effects on the observer? Right? Again, nope not to an atheist. Won't go near it. ??????? What's the deal with that? How do you evaluate from experiments you "refuse" to conduct? In light of the severity of punishment, is this rational. Evidence# 3 :Lack of common sense and rational thought Argument from inconsistent revelations, also known as the avoiding the wrong hell problem, is an argument against the existence of God. It asserts that it is unlikely that God exists because many theologians and faithful adherents have produced conflicting and mutually exclusive revelations. Avoiding the "wrong" HELL? "IF" you do not search each religion to find out which IS correct ..... Your "DEFINITELY" going to the Hell that IS correct? Right ? Cause your "not" looking? I mean that's pretty much in your face kinda truth, yeah? How did atheist conclude no search no Hell? Kinda like wearing a parachute on a plane that's going down, but you don't know which door to jump out, so you STAY IN THE PLANE? Hey, "Pick a door" if it don't lead out, You what? "Yeah", you pick another door! logical right? Nope, not to an atheist. In their view no look no consequence? What? Evidence# 4 :Lack of common sense and rational thought Rejection of concepts that cannot be falsified. Evolution- completely false, proven false by experimentation by scientist no less! They did however prove life COULD NOT have evolved naturally so that is to their credit. Easily provable! Name for the world, just 1 bacteria or microbe that evolved into a living, air-breathing, mammal, insect, fish, crustacean, by evolutionary experimentation? or under any circumstance for that fact? Let alone evolving into 8 million distinctly different species. If it couldn't become one not gonna become 8 million distinctly differnt species is it! Are we learning yet? Point is this IS something that cannot be falsified, yet bought by every atheist on the planet! And the evidence that still is a lie remains right in front of them! Evidence# 5 :Lack of common sense and rational thought Argument from nonbelief is a philosophical argument that asserts an inconsistency between the existence of God and a world in which people fail to recognize him. I'm sorry, this gives me a duh factor. Why "would" a God you refuse to acknowledge, refuse to respect, refuse to be thankful for, refuse to listen to, make fun of, "choose" to acknowledge you? Oh Please! Course atheist never tell anyone they've never actually "looked" for God! That a person who never bothers to look can even attempt to use this argument is irrational. Evidence# 6 :Lack of common sense and rational though Occam's razor ("law of parsimony") is a problem-solving principle attributed to William of Ockham (c. 1287"1347), who was an English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher and theologian. yeah, science alright! Clearly many did not bother to read its description any further, causing yet another "duh" factor from me. The rest of the story is: In the scientific method, Occam's razor is not considered an irrefutable principle of logic or a scientific result; Unless of course your an atheist! Evidence# 7 :Lack of common sense and rational though Burden of proof lies not on the atheist to disprove the existence of God but on the theist to provide a rationale for theism. This of course is the greatest of atheist complete inability to demonstrate even a modicum of reason! Allow me to prove beyond all doubt that this is so. Holder of the burden When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo. Total believers in the World as of 2010. , 6.67 Billion people. Status quo Total non believers 1.1 Billion people not the status quo It is the Atheist who are challenging the status quo, not the believers. I therefore: Shift the burden of proof One way in which one would attempt to shift the burden of proof is by comitting a logical fallacy known as the argument from ignorance. Atheist have clearly demonstrated an arguement of ignorance by the false belief that THEY ARE the status quo, when verifiable population and census, show that Believers are the status quo by a 6:1 ratio. 99+ percent of the population demonstrates active worship of God. That is the staus quo, not the nonbeievers. Evidence# 8 :Lack of common sense and rational though but even if it were reasonable for Theist to provide a rationale for theism. Word picture hear: imagine a old fashion balance or weight scale. Put 1.1 Billion people on one side, that side will clearly drop to the bottom. Now drop 6.67 Billion on the outer plate, I dare say the 1.1 Billion would be "launched" into the great beyond. If that is not enough rationale for them to at the very least consider looking for God. Well I guess you are an atheist, huh? As to Earth age? Do the math for yourself, stop listening and reading everybody elses work. Do your own. Census of the United States in 1790 was 3,929,214 Beginning of Census , that increased to 323,928,727 million by 2016, thats and increase of 319,999,513 over a 226 year timespan. Our species was distinguished about 200,000 years ago. www.universetoday.com/38125/how-long-have-humans-been-on-earth/ dividing 226 into 200,000 is 884.9, taking just the amount increased in the U.S alone multiple 319,999,513 by 884.9 Remember thats only the U.S, and there are only 7+ Billion people on the whole Earth now. QUESTION: IF science is right? Where are all the people? go figure, guess the scientist didn't do the Math EITHER huh?