Atheism is Arbitrary, Inconsistent and it Borrows from the Bible

I would like to explain what I think about the existance of God. In his book called "The God Delusion", Richard Dawkins created a 1-7 scale to calculate an individual's theism/atheism (https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Spectrum_of_theistic_probability). I would say that I'm 6. Which means that if evidence arises that God exists, Then I will believe in him. I'm sure 99% of atheists would also believe in God's existance if they were provided enough evidence. You cannot prove the absence of something. Never. Can you prove that Santa doesn't exist? No. Can you prove that the Easter Bunny doesn't exist? No. Can you prove that a huge spaghetti monster pretending to be God doesn't exist? No. You can prove how illogical and absurd something would be if it existed, But there is no such thing as evidence of absence. Nobody can prove that God doesn't exist. Just like nobody can prove that anything doesn't exist. Your "atheism is arbitrary" argument only works if God exists. Which I conclude he does not, That argument is pointless. How atheism is arbitrary, When it promotes gathering evidence and making logical conclusions, I do not know. Of course atheists kiss their wife, Get angry when someone is murdered, Etc! That is because of human brains and psychology. We are, As you put it, "chemical accidents" (though that isn't completely correct), But that doesn't mean we should be heartless amoeba. Feelings are created by the human brain. We don't punish the lion because it's mentally retarded (compared to humans): can't talk, Can't think logically, Etc. So there is no point in punishing a lion because it's less smart than humans, And won't learn anything from that punishment. Social darwinism is a horrible system to live in, And it shouldn't be promoted. But that doesn't make Darwinism incorrect. Just because something is horrible doesn't mean it's not true. "Borrow from the Bible argument"- stupidity never ending. The argument that the non-existance of God would cause humans to run around naked, Stop marrying, Abandon education, Treat the ill, Create laws, Learn science, Is the worst argument against atheism I have ever heard. Seriously. How can you utter such nonsense? I won't even discuss that argument and leave it to the voters to decide if it's logical. I repeat once again: atheism is the lack of belief in God/gods. It is not the assumption that we are chemical accidents. It is not the belief that the Big Bang happened. It is not the belief that man is the ultimate authority. It is not the belief in social Darwinism. But let me ask you some questions which I want you to answer: Can you prove that God exists? With actual evidence, Not philosophy. Why do Muslims, Buddhists, And other non-Christians wear clothes, Go to school, Etc? Why did morality exist before Christianity, Which appeared 1st century CE; and why did morality exist before Judaism, Which appeared around 1800 BCE? Why did people wear clothes, Go to school, Etc in places like pagan Ancient Rome before Jesus was even born and before Christianity appeared? Why did people in almost completely atheist states, Like the USSR, Wear clothes, Go to school, Etc? Why were people in almost completely atheist states, Like the USSR, Moral? Is there an authority above God? If no, How do you know? Isn't that an arbitrary assumption? Why do immoral Christians exist? If morality comes from God, Does that mean humans are only moral when told to do so? If morality comes from God, Are humans only moral because of heaven/hell? Why do moral atheists exist? Most people have never read the Bible. How can they borrow anything from it?