BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Hulk vs Darkness (Marvel's Green Scar vs Dark Horse's comics's Darkness)

Interesting! Although this poses a disadvantage to Jackie, it just means he would need to fight smarter. Without using dark energy for the hulk to absorb, he can make explosions, kinetic impacts, and extremely powerful gunfire. Another thing I would like to mention is you say "the darkness," which is entirely different from Jackie Estacado. If Jackie Estacado is not in control, the darkness becomes much, much, more powerful. In "the darkness 2", when temporarily immobilized, woke up to find the darkness had torn through his enemies. Another point I would like to make is that Jackie Estacado was hesitating. He was trying to calm banner down, not trying to kill him. Another thing is Jackie in this comic had not yet manifested the extremely powerful darkness armor, which would give him a great advantage.
why do you masterbate with tweesers

1) You spelled 'masturbate' wrong 2) You spelled 'tweezers' wrong 3) Why are you watching me through my window while I masturbate with tweezers? 4) I do it with tweezers so that I dont get germs.... I mean do you know where a penis couldve been these days? The only hting more disease-ridden then a penis is the mouth of any American Woman 5) Youve been trolled ;D
A dog is a superior pet to have then a cat.

Indeed, I sincerely apologize. Now to begin the debate. I would first like to remind the voters that my opponent already forfeited all 7 points, since he didn't begin with his starting statements. Because of such, I have basically already won. Regardless of such however, I will now continue the debate.Contention 1: Man's best friend, and health's best friend Dogs are commonly known as man's best friend. But did you know they are also very helpful for your health? Obviously, owning a dog, you must walk it and play with it. This presents more excersice to dog owners. Cat's do not require such, and because of that, do not present much excersice. With all this movement, you improve you cardovascular health. Dogs also aid in anxiety. They are great friends to help cope with anxiety."For people with all forms of anxiety, having a dog may be an important coping mechanism. This is especially true in times of crisis. A study out of the Medical College of Virginia found that for hospitalized patients with mental health issues, therapy with animals significantly reduced anxiety levels more than conventional recreational therapy sessions." [1] Though this is kind of complicated, dogs also boost your immune system. The reason for this is because they bring in dirt to the house. This dirt contains small bacteria which helps stregthen the immune system. Cats do not have the same features. [2]There are many more things that dogs aid in when it comes to health that cats are just unable to do. If I explained all of them, there wouldn't be enough space.Contention 2: Responsibility The title is self-explanitory. Dogs require many things, such as food, water, training, walking etc. Because of such, owners need to cleanse all of these needs. This helps a lot in responsibility. Having a dog teaches you to be responsible, and able to take care of. Cats need only cat litter food and water. Because of such, the amount of responsibility required is much less. This is great, because children will learn the imporance of responsibility. With a cat, this would not be as effectiveContention 3: Genius! A dog has a much more advanced brain than a cat. Basically, in order to understand how a creature has a more develloped brain than another, you would look at how many wrinkles there are on the brain. So now let's look at both their brains.Dog's brain [3] Cat's brain [4] As you can see, much less wrinkles are presented. So a dog is obviously more develloped than a cat.Conclusion In conclusion, dogs are undisputably superior pets to own. They are smarter, improve your health, and incourage responsibility, things that cats simply can't do as effectively. REMINDER MY OPPONENT FORFEITED ALL THEIR POINTS SINCE HE/SHE DID NOT BEGIN WITH THEIR OPENING STATEMENTS. sources:1.http://abcnews.go.com...2.http://drdavidhamilton.com...3.http://vanat.cvm.umn.edu...4.http://serendip.brynmawr.edu...;
A dog is a superior pet to have then a cat.

I am challenging con to this debate. This is a debate about which animal is better for a pet. If my opponent chooses to accept this debate, they also accept the rules that are about to be explained. RULES: 1. first round you must write your opening statements, and last round you write "no argument this round" 2. No plagiarism 3. No full capital words. (example: CATS FOR THE WIN!!!!) 4. No forfeiting 5. concessions can only be made after the 3rd round. If any rules above are broken, my opponent will experience a 7 point deduction.
A dog is a superior pet to have then a cat.

Ok... Its obvious we need to go over some things: First of all, a cat can also do everything you said in "Condition 1" Second of all, taking care of a dog is only one way one can learn responsibllites. A cat takes responsibility too, but because they are easier to take care of, people appreciate them more. Because, face it, people are busy, and should not always have to take care of their dog every second of their lives. Third of all, Just because a dog's brain has more wrinkles, does not mean it is a better pet. That has nothing to do with it. If you are going with dogs being able to be a seeing eye animal, then that's different, but if you are just going to come out and say "dogs are smarter" then you have another thing coming, for you see; "The key to understanding differences between cats and dogs comes down to understanding their ecology." Becuase of this, "Dogs have a more evolved social communication repertoire than cats, and that leads them to do things humans equate with being smarter," when in fact, it is just human preference. Source: http://parade.condenast.com... Fourth of all, some dogs are just nuisances: Some are too hyper, are more resistant to house breaking, are more prone to chew on things, have more health issues, bark or whine too much and keep people up at night, need to be walked every day, you have to clean up after them much more oftern, can bite and attack owners and others as well as other animals, and when walking, a dog can pull on a leash and might severely injure their owner. Last of all, I do not understand what you mean by "forfeting points". Is that something you came up with, because I am gonna answer your arguments in any way I like, as long as it isn't mean or rude. Also, for the opening statement thing, I did not put one becuase 1. I was just answering back your challenge and 2. you put on the wrong argument, so I thought I would wait until you put one on. (P.S. You already broke your own rule when you put "Reminder- My Opponent Forfeited All Their Points Since He/She Did Not Begin With Their Opening Statements" in caps... so you kind of 'forfeited' yourself) Conclusion: Cats are a more peaceful animal to have around the house and are just as smart, if not smarter, than a dog.
It is more likely than not that morality does not exist

I will be arguing in the pro position for the following resolution. Resolved: It is more likely than not that Morality does not exist. I will be taking a stance on moral nihilism while it is my opponent’s job to find arguments to prove that morality is more likely to exist. This is a philosophical debate, so arguments thus will be purely philosophical. Both debaters are welcome to use sources of course, however keeping in mind that sources aren’t as important in philosophical outside of quoting.
A challenge to old debaters

If I had my music software I would. It only costs $400 in which I don't have. You don't know the crap I go through. I collect S. S. (yeah another pitiful hard luck s--t story). I only get $1035 per month. My rent is $800 per month. Right now I exist in astronomical pain and am slated to go through surgery on my hands on the 3rd and will be in a splint for two weeks. Then no heavy lifting for 3 months. Then the same thing on my other hand. Thankfully I have a good insurance and they will help me get my groceries delivered to my door. I have a great friend who has helped me out and would die for me and will be looking in on me. I'm a movie lover also. I just got Hulu today and I have Netflix and Amazon Prime also. So I won't be lonely. I love foreign films. And saw 2 great ones last night. I hope you don't go through the crap I go through.
A challenge to old debaters

Now we're getting somewhere! I did take the time and hi karate jesus jujitsu read your final RD. I do write songs though it has been a while because maids have come on into my place and stolen my software even though I have told them not to. I miss it terribly. Yes, There's a link to some of them on my profile. I also compose my very own insults and poetry. Some is pure garbage at best, Some has some deep personal meaning. Now you were being amazingly arrogant, Repulsive and repugnant in that first RD of the previous debate, And come on you know it, Sooooooo with that being said, I'm a bit of an arrogant sarcastic (I do love sarcasm just in case you haven't noticed) a$$ myself and who the hell knows where I come up with those insults? They just plop into my brain. There's never any harmful intent. I do hope you got a good laugh or two from them. Peace. Please always tc and haveth thee fun. -Michael
A challenge to old debaters

"Sorry in point blank boring yourself to sleep by your lack of intelligence and an edumacation of a below the belt octopus radial mom that gives you the bubonic plague, With an obvious reel that keeps repeating itself over and over and over again, "This sounds like a song. I like it. "Guess what cowbore? I didn't read a single word you posted in your most recent RD simply because you are an arrogant, Repulsive, Repugnant, An irresponsible gunslinger with a noose around his neck spectacle of Disneyland ninnies that cannot be taken seriously. Ta ta. "Oh, I'm very much not arrogant. Repulsive? Repugnant? Possible. Arrogant? No.
A challenge to old debaters

Sorry in point blank boring yourself to sleep by your lack of intelligence and an edumacation of a below the belt octopus radial mom that gives you the bubonic plague, With an obvious reel that keeps repeating itself over and over and over again, Well you know its like a happy hairy hard off trying to repent for his anal inducing sins, Guess what cowbore? I didn't read a single word you posted in your most recent RD simply because you are an arrogant, Repulsive, Repugnant, An irresponsible gunslinger with a noose around his neck spectacle of Disneyland ninnies that cannot be taken seriously. Ta ta.
A challenge to old debaters

Ah the barking penguin meows at the moon. "Pick a topic" Awfully vague. "Make sure it follows debate rules. " What debate rules? I see, Yours from a septic tank of greased well hung dung. "Make sure it's debatable and non-esoteric. " Oh you mean be like the the worst president of all time Donald Trump and behave like the god of the bible because they have hundreds, Of not thousand of things in common? "Do not troll. " You do. So you have proven yourself to be a 100% pure contradictory hypocrite. So everything you state and say cannot be accepted in any possible way as truth. "Lay out the debate resolution of which you're con, " Nope not is I want to bait you. I"m very good at that. You are a king at falling into traps. "I'll be the pro of that. " (Grammatically incorrect btw) Well you"ve proven yourself to be a "pro" at only being a sheer terror of absolute boredom. "Do not pick something religious. " Awe well gee, Religion is something that you know nothing about which is why you think you are god and why you avoid it. Isn"t that right snookums? "If you accept this debate but fail my rules, Then voters must vote me the winner. " Well if you notice, And you haven"t noticed, Obviously, Because your brains are splattered in your bile, People generally don"t vote. And if they do, There"s only one or two votes, Three tops. Do you REALLY think you are King of the gutterballs with that many votes? Wow. Proclaim yourself as goo. Sorry, God. I"m so very glad I made your day better. Please do not post me again unless you have something intelligent to say.
A challenge to old debaters

Pick a topic. Make sure it follows debate rules. Make sure it's debatable and non-esoteric. Do not troll. Lay out the debate resolution of which you're con, I'll be the pro of that. Do not pick something religious. If you accept this debate but fail my rules, Then voters must vote me the winner. Round 1 is just outlining what the resolution is. Round 2, I begin my case. BOP is shared.
President Barack Obama has Developed a Shady Reputation

"Saying that someone's reputation is just based off of quotes is a lie to everyone reading. "According to Pro's reasoning if someone has lied multiple times or said numerous false statements, we should ignore it. Essentially, Pro is stating we should ignore what people say. Pro is not a credible judge of character if this is his stance since he wants to ignore what people say. "This is completely wrong, if you would continue reading on your source you provided, then you would have read the special update that said. .. .. Therefore your infamous false statement that you quoted is wrong. I would like it more if you would provide complete sources. Thanks. "Con must not be reading what he is posting(look below). Where does it say that we can keep our plans? It doesn't. Therefore Con is spreading misinformation because you can't keep your plan ultimately. "You can now keep your plan until 2017 in some states! .. .. .. .. .. .This essentially extends some non-compliant non-grandfathered plans until 2017 (a plan renewed in 2016 is good for one year, the latest date to renew your plan is October 2016)"Then it only mentions that only SOME STATES are providing an extension, not all. Con is misleading here, there is no evidence pointing to people can keep their plans indefinitely. "According to my source, nearly 41 million young adults were not covered at that time. I'm not sure what basis your source was basing there numbers off of, but its wrong. "My opponent used an inferior resource to point out young adults that aren't covered. That show my opponent didn't even bother reading the link I posted. The source used the U. S. Census Bureau data from 2012 which clearly pointed out that majority of young adults were covered. A private foundation does not collect the same amount of data compared to the U. S. Census Bureau. The source is also invalid because it is left leaning and clearly has an agenda. The US Census Bureau is nonpartisan and just collects data without an agenda. [1]. http://www.census.gov...My opponent hasn't refuted anything I have said. We can't keep our health plans yet Obama told us we could keep it. Now, people are paying the consequences from this lie. pople have had to adjust their plans while some may have had to pay higher costs for their new plans. Obama had numerous lies to tell us about Obamacare. Yet my opponent has not been able to refute a single one of them. We have a good undertanding of the Obama administartion when Jonathan Gruber told us, "the lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the average American voter or whatever, but basically taht was really really critical for the thing to pass[2]. " Is this not shady? It is very shady. [2]. http://dailycaller.com...I
President Barack Obama has Developed a Shady Reputation

You're completely wrong when saying "we are not discussing what was honorable." When discussing someone's reputation, you must look at everything they have done, whether honorable or not. That's what makes up someone's reputation. Saying that someone's reputation is just based off of quotes is a lie to everyone reading. Moving on, In your first argument you said, "The most infamous false statement, was it just a false statement or a lie for political gain? Obama told us that if we liked our plan we could keep it. A direct quote from Obaamcarefacts.com, "Under Obama Care you can keep your health insurance until 2015, even if it doesn't comply with the ACA. Come 2015, if your plan doesn't have a grandfathered status and doesn't meet the requirements of the ACA, then you will have to choose a new plan." This is completely wrong, if you would continue reading on your source you provided, then you would have read the special update that said, "SPECIAL UPDATE: You can now keep your plan until 2017 in some states! The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS, i.e. the department in charge of ObamaCare) has announced that health insurance plans that were supposed to be canceled by Obamacare by 2014 may be sold through October of 2016 in states that approve of the extension. This essentially extends some non-compliant non-grandfathered plans until 2017 (a plan renewed in 2016 is good for one year, the latest date to renew your plan is October 2016)" [1] Therefore your infamous false statement that you quoted is wrong. I would like it more if you would provide complete sources. Thanks. [1]http://obamacarefacts.com... In your second argument you stated that "Only about 25-27% of young Americans didn't have health insurance..." This again shows the lack of research that you have completed before accusing a president of having a shady reputation. According to my source, nearly 41 million young adults were not covered at that time. I'm not sure what basis your source was basing there numbers off of, but its wrong. [2] [2] http://kff.org... I have ran out of characters to type the rest of my debate. I will continue next round.
President Barack Obama has Developed a Shady Reputation

REBUTTALS:"The President although widely criticized by the Republican party has done many things that were honorable and were the exact opposite of shady."We are not discussing what was honorable."For example, when Bush was president and 911 occurred, what did he do? He sent in hundreds of thousands of troops and got no result."This is a petty attempt at a distraction. Bush is irrelevant to this debate."Barack Obama being the first African American President is criticized more than any other white president has ever been."What proof do you have of that he has been " criticized more than any other white president has ever been?" "What has Barack Obama honestly done to give himself a shady reputation?"See below.ARGUMENTS:Since you have asked, here is an entire list of why he has a shady reputation:#1. "If you like your plan you can keep it."-Barack Hussein ObamaThe most infamous false statement, was it just a false statement or a lie for political gain? Obama told us that if we liked our plan we could keep it. A direct quote from Obaamcarefacts.com, "Under ObamaCare you can keep your health insurance until 2015, even if it doesn"t comply with the ACA. Come 2015, if your plan doesn"t have a grandfathered status and doesn"t meet the requirements of the ACA, then you will have to choose a new plan[1]."[1]http://obamacarefacts.com...http://www.youtube.com...#2. "Most young Americans right now, they"re not covered"-Barack Hussein Obama[2]Only about 25%-27% of young Americans didn't have health insurance when he made the claim[2].[2]http://www.politifact.com...#3. "Give every American the same opportunity"-Barack Hussein Obama[3]Obamacare had restrictions and not every American had or has the same opportunity to access Obamacare[3].[3]http://www.politifact.com...#4. Obama claimed preventative care saved money[4]The Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan government entity stated that prevenattive would not save money but cost more money[4].[4]http://www.politifact.com...#5 .""Over the last two years, health care premiums have gone up -- it's true -- but they've gone up slower than any time in the last 50 years."-Barack Hussein Obama[5]This was a false statement, only healthcare spending declined not the costs of premiums[5]. Premiums were going up with Obamcare.[5]http://www.politifact.com...Shall I go on? There is plenty of more to add to his shady reputation.
President Barack Obama has Developed a Shady Reputation

I as con will be arguing in negation of the resolution. Obama has proven throughout many cases that he has the authority and power of the country. The President although widely criticized by the Republican party has done many things that were honorable and were the exact opposite of shady. For example, when Bush was president and 911 occurred, what did he do? He sent in hundreds of thousands of troops and got no result. Obama on the other hand sent in a group of men who killed Osama Bin Laden. How can someone say that Barack Obama has developed a shady reputation. Just because Obama has used his given power of an Executive order, doesn't mean that he has a shady reputation. Barack Obama being the first African American President is criticized more than any other white president has ever been. What has Barack Obama honestly done to give himself a shady reputation?
President Barack Obama has Developed a Shady Reputation

Introduction & PremisesI as Pro will be arguing in favor of the resolution. The burden of proof is on me to prove President Barack Obama has developed a shady reputation. This was not the man we expected when we first elected in 2008. Obama reputation has become shadier as time has progressed during his term in the presidency. I will post my substansive arguments the next round. DefinitionsShady:"Of doubtful honesty"[1]. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...Reputation: "The beliefs or opinions that are generally held about someone or something[2]"[2]. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...Get
A monotheistic God exists

I shall address this concisely:1) Either energy and matter are eternal, or an omnipresent consciousness is eternal. The first one doesn't make any sense. Scientists today, both evolutionists and creationists, say that the universe has not always been there. And that space and time, matter and energy had a starting point.2) God doesn't necessarily have to abolish all misfortunes. In fact, it says in the Bible that suffering is something we will all experience for good reasons:Romans 5:3-5More than that, we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not put us to shame, because God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us. 1 Peter 5:10And after you have suffered a little while, the God of all grace, who has called you to his eternal glory in Christ, will himself restore, confirm, strengthen, and establish you.Romans 8:18For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed to us.So the argument that God wouldn't allow suffering is invalid.
this is the best conservative estimate of how many planets have complex life like ours: 1429 planets

how many stars are there? 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. 70 sextillion is 7 followed by twenty-two zeroes what's the probability of life forming? one in seven billion so... if you assume that it's just as likely that something as complex as a human would form, as it is for life to form.... using basic probability... you take 7 billion times 7 billion. 49 and how many zeros? (to get the zeros we simply count them, nine zeros in a billion, so 18 zeros billion in the billion times that initial billion set. that means,,, there's 70,000 plus 18 more zeros, base) take 70,000 divided by 49, and you get.... 1429 planets, ie stars with planets with life complex like ours, out there, as a conservative estimate.