Debate.org should promote debtors to insult each other.

Wait a second, this debate is loosing its high status.... I'm getting disappointed. What are you talking about when you said that I drop a few points? I didn't realize that you answer any of my points. Who are you trying to full? Are you making fun of the audience? You should keep that kind of cards for the fifth round, maybe you didn't notices, but you have a huge advantage over me. YOU HAVE THE LAST WORD of the debate. It is true that you can be funny and nice at the same time, but you can also be funny and arrogant at the same time, (dear audience please do not try this with your relatives or close friends), there are too many nice people in the world. It is nice to be nice, but when it comes to debates, jerks do it better. You know what I meant ;-) I'm not really advocating fro quantity of insults, just for quality. A good insult, should be very personal. Let me show an example: Last month I was having a regular conversation with a close friend in which we talk about Israel, when my friend got intellectually bank-corrupt he turn the conversation to the personal level. My friend say in spanish: “you defend Israel like a christian creationist” , it is an insult because we both agree that Christianity is an insane ideology and it does more harm than good, probably if you live in USA the equivalent would be to call you a communist. The insult is even bigger because science do not accept that the world is 6000 years old. A very good insult have to offend very much your opponent but it should sound like a non insult to the audience, so you make your opponent to behave like a full and at the same time you don't look like a bastard. So in reality what my friend mean to say is “You are stupid, shut up!, there is no point to listen your arguments, I don't want to spend my time arguing with someone as stupid as you”. This is just one example of high quality insults. It is also a fallacy because it assumes that whatever Christians do it have to be wrong: you can't do something good on a wrong reason, to make this fallacy you need to insult your opponent, without an insult it doesn’t work. Imagine something like: “you argue like a kiwi”, if your opponent don't feel insulted by being called wiki, the argument is non sensical. Another example: Pro-life groups usually call their opposition “murders” or “owners of the dead industry” (not sure if it is well translated), What makes the situation tragic or “sat” as I mention before, is when the people who make those insult/fallacy start thinking they really made an argument and they think they are right. I realize that my friend conclude that Israel should be destroy because some Christians think it should exist. “Pro-life” people really think abortion = murder. In some occasions you see a religious guy murdering a doctor in order to prevent that doctor to keep practicing abortions. Islamists do far more than insulting, they send dead threat to anyone who don't agree with them. And judging by the results it works, because here in Europe we have many labour party supporters who claim that the word “islamofobia” is a genuine term. Like if being afraid of islam would be something irrational, there is anything wrong about islam? Well, they did the 9/11, organize celebrations for it and blame the jews for it, and 10 years later open a mosque at the ground zero named “cordoba” just to make it clear that they are working to conquer USA, they keep saying sharia is the only law and advocating death to every one who disagrees with them... Let me repeat the same I said in the last round: “You don't need to be right to win a debate” When I'm talking with my boss and I said I think X, and then he saids “if you do X you should be fire”, then I accept Y and I lose the debate. Does it mean that he is right? Maybe yes, or maybe he just know to do better bulling. Fundamental islamists are very good at bulling, they are moral monsters, they may win the support of so many people but they are not right in the true sense of the word, they are only right in the sense that abusing works. Last time I argue in public with an islamist about the morality of islam I ask him very politely what is moral in modern time about dead penalty for apostasy. He just yell on me saying that I don't understand the Qur’an. (he win the argument) Debating is like boxing, you can't play proper boxing with your friends without their consent. You can't punch you friend just for fun, and you can't insult your friend just for fun. Debating without provoking each others anger is like boxing without touching/harming each other. It is not the same. Can you imagine boxing without touching each other? I can imagine that, but it is not the same. I saw may debates in which the organizer says you can't make semantic tricks, is it fear? Come on, are we in a kinder garden? I even meet users in this web site pretending they are female children, they are not happy enough hiding their identity, who are they trying to fool? Are they saying “please don't be hard with me, I'm a little girl?” We should be brave and don't get intimidated by others, and here is a place where you can get use to be insulted without any further consequences. Everyone asking for a debate is looking for trouble. Here is a video of Nigel Farage telling Van Rompuy (president of the european council) that he has the carisma of a “damp rag”, do you think it was adecuate for Farage to provoke Rompuy in such way? I don't like the politicial agenda of Farage, but I think he is great when it comes to debating. http://www.youtube.com... Finally I have a very disapointing confession to make. I'M NOT GOD. I know it can feel shocking, reality sucks. I'm not the one recommending to chop off the end of a penis. If god had an account in debate.org I would ask him lots of scientific questions a lots of questions about why he did such things in the old testament. I'm sorry if I disappointed you. But i'm not god, so we will have to remain atheist for a while and keep searchinf for him. I'm sure no one in the audience had that delusion, so no need to apologies to them, except for my bad spelling and poor vocabulary.