Women should not be allowed to vote or have authority

My opponent started off by saying that what I said were not facts. But this is just a cop-out. I cannot prove that an apple is healthier than a cheese buger, but most people are rational enough to know that eating a apple is much healthier than eating a cheese buger, without having absolute proof. A lot of women can't even decide what shoes to put on in the morning. It's the same with shopping. Women will spend ages in a shop. They will finally decide what to buy, then a few minutes later they will put it back on the shelf and look for something else. It drives me crazy. Men think in straight lines, women think in circles. I don't need to prove this. Some things are so obvious. But if my opponent is going to demand absolute proof, then I demand absolute proof for everything she has to say. I can play at that game, too. My opponent claims that women are better at dealing with emotions. I disagree! I believe women are mentally stronger than men, but I also believe that women are emotionally immature. Their emotionas are very fickle, which leads them to make irrational decisions. This is why I believe they should not vote or have authority, because they make decisions based on their emotions, and their emotions can be immature and very fickle. When it comes to truth and rationality, we cannot go by our emotions, because our emotions can change. We have to go by logic, and women put their emotions before their logic. My opponent also said that women are better at communicating than men. However, unless my opponent can prove women use telepathy, I fail to see why women are better communicators.My opponent says that "Feminism aims to obtain equal rights and value for women in society; any so-called fury or intolerance is only in response to perceived inequality and oppression." Most people stopped believing this lie a long time ago, yet this big lie still gets repeatedly told. Modern day feminism has nothing to do with eqaulity. It is a cult that is driven by man-hating women. Some modern day feminists have said things like, "Women will rule the world," "All men are rapists," "The curse of every mother is her own son." If feminism is about equality, why are the feminists not fighting for the equal rights of the father? Fathers today have very little rights, yet I see no outrage from the feminists. If my opponent is hell bent on spewing lies, then such a debate is meaningless. My opponent goes on to say, "Both men and women acknowledge that women, particularly mothers, deserve certain protections under the law. This includes receiving monetary support for child care." But everybody knows that when the government says to women, "If you have a child, we'll pay for it, you don't need the father," that many women will take advantage of that. The governments and the liberals knew very well that once they changed the law to only benefit women, then women would take advantage of it. I once heard an MP on TV admit that father's should not get equal rights, and I can even post the video link if my opponent refuses to believe it. The governments deliberately changed the law to benefit women, because they new that women would use the law to their advantage, and as a result marriage and family would crumble.My opponent then talks about how hard it was for women before the 1960's having very little rights. Well, in the 1960's women started to get more rights, where they could get more support if they were in abusive relationships. I have no problem with this. I don't think any woman should be forced to suffer abusive relationships. However, these changes that began in the 1960's did not stop. It continued to only focues on women's rights and has continued right up to our present time. We now live in a time where the law has made it very difficult for a father to get proper access to his children, even if he pays child support. Women can freely have an abortion, regardless of the reason. Married women can also sleep around, take the children, and go off with another man, yet the husband will still have very little rights. I see time and time again women using their children as a weapon, and I see no outrage from the feminists. I have no problem with women getting help if they are in abusive relationships, but the law has gone to the extreme where it tells women, "If you commit adultery and get a divorce, we will still support you. We will give you rights over the children and help empty your husbands bank account." This is the reason more and more men are avoiding marriage, but this was all part of the governments plan--to destroy marriage and family.My opponent then went on to list some key arguments as to why women should vote. All she did was quote other people, but not a single shred of evidence was given. My main focus is on marriage and family, and I believe that the main reason marriage and family have become shadows of their former selves is a direct result of the law giving women a ridiculous amount of authority.