I"m Pro-choice, tell me why you aren"t

Science works by developing theories that can later be discredited or proven wrong. One example is pluto no longer being considered a planet, despite previous conviction the definition of what is considered a planet changed . so while technically a zygote/ fetus is considered human "life", scientists can not agree on when it is considered a human-being, that same definition classifies bacteria as life. pro-life or pro-choice scientists are equivalent as long as they provide evidence for their theories. Evangelical pastors do represent christianity. Just because they are not the majority does not mean they don"t carry representation. By using biblical evidence alone, the bible advocates for genocide, rape, murder, slavery, women being properties etc. A sleeping person is: a human-being, alive outside of the womb, developed brain/organs, not dependent on someone else"s body to exist, etc. i never said a fetus not experiencing pain was the sole reason for an abortion being ethical. The fact that it takes four years for an already small amount of children to be adopted and the fact that this figure is not 100%, 20,000 people annually age out of the foster care system without being adopted. If all of women were forced into carrying that fetus to term, that is an extra 3 million kids in the foster care system or on welfare within 5 years.. Here is just one example from the state of California https://boothkoskoff.com.... Social workers in the foster care system are understaffed, overworked and have a high turnover rate, meaning that they struggle with the time or resources to properly monitor foster homes. In less than 2 years: "276 cases of foster abuse in the state of California. However, an investigation by the Los Angeles Times uncovered that the state underreported foster abuse cases to meet the national standard of 0.32%..". That's good that your friends weren't messed up in the foster care system, unfortunately that is not everyone's reality. I know a pair of siblings that were aged out in the foster care system and changed group homes over 10 times and were constantly abused. I also knew someone who was a foster parent for the income, mentally abused the kids and pocketed most of the money for herself, barely taking care of them. Also: http://www.tampabay.com.... The opioid epidemic is a great example of what can happen when there are too many children in the system and not enough resources. "The instability that comes from being bounced from home to home causes emotional, psychological, and physical harm. We literally cannot take care of all of the children in the system today, so putting hundreds and thousands more in the system is only going to cause further issues. Adoption is not an alternative for abortion because you still would be required to carry the pregnancy for 9 months & birth it. Some women get extremely sick, experience a lot of pain, struggle with mental disorders from the change in hormones (ie post partnum depression). Having a complicated or painful pregnancy can get in the way of a woman"s career or education. Mind you, the US has one of the worst maternity leave options for women of developed countries. Most of maternity leave is unpaid. Then you are either required to go through labor or have a major surgery to remove it. The United States has the highest maternal mortality rate of all of the first world developed countries. Why should someone be forced to risk their life over a fetus they do not want? I have a right to bodily autonomy therefore I have the right to choose if I want to put my body through that or take those risks,no one is required to give blood, or a kidney transplant even if that results in the death of the person needing one. Almost everyone agrees with the sentiment that abortion should be allowed in the case of incest or rape, or at the very least if the woman's life is at risk - which further proves that while a fetus is biologically human "life" it is not the same thing as an actual human-being. "When I said that, I meant they MIGHT be allowed to do that. If their drug addiction is weed, then fine. If it"s crack, then no." Just so you know, you can't decide or control what people's addictions are.Should women who are addicts and admit won"t quit be banned from abortion? The rate of babies born addicted to drugs has quadrupled in the last two decades, some hospitals are opening up seperate wings specifically for these babies. IUDs can cost over $1,000 without insurance, many women cannot afford this and unless the government wants to provide free IUD"s to everyone, this cannot be required or expected."When abortion is legal, data can be measured more accurately by health statistics and reports. when Abortion is illegal, they rely on other methods such as looking at " abortion-related" complications in hospitals and surveys. Some people have no complications, or would not admit they had one in the survey out of fear of persecution. So that estimated number could be much higher." "Every abortion is dangerous since it kills a human life. This will"sound harsh but when when women had abortions when it was illegal, they kindof deserved to die because at that time, they murdered a baby. This is a tangent on the death penalty." Again, something being biologically life is not a person/baby."50% of pregnancies result in a miscarriage in the first trimester, should they be charged with manslaughter in the same way accidentally killing a person is charged? No, this is because a fetus is not equivalent. And I don"t understand the logic of being pro-life and supporting the death penalty, makes no sense but anyway, I completely understand that there are pro-life layers, I respect your decision. That is why you don"t have to ever get an abortion, and I would fight for your right to make that choice. The judicial system is incredibly flawed. A woman could be wrongfully convicted or tried as a criminal for a miscarriage. Comparing us to El Salvador is not comparable to saying having legal abortions makes us like China and North Korea. El Salvador had abortions completely illegal and jails women for getting them, which is what you want. China and North Korea have forced abortions. Pro-choice is not pro-abortion, I don"t think anyone should be forced what to do with her body. Science does not depend on what the church thinks. The fact that science contradicts the Bible is simply a matter of being educated & actually studying and questioning things before accepting them in blind faith. Your whole argument is based on a scientific term for "life" yet you are questioning scientists and saying their options rely on the church. Do you believe in science or do you not? You want to fine people $500 for having sex, how will that be monitored? How are they gonna pay for that? Lots of poor people have sex, but no worries let"s just throw them in jail when they don"t pay along with anyone who aborts, and put people with miscarriages on trial costing us a bunch of tax-payer dollars. Meanwhile, have to open more foster cares for all these children who"s parents are in jail/ don"t want them. This is the material made for a dystopian novel." You could never convince me to be anti-choice bc I respect every person"s right to choose. A fetus is not equivalent to a person, until you pro-lifers decide to carry our unwanted fetuses in your own womb, I will decide what to do with my body.