The universe is made of only one particle

1,2. We do not know what dark matter or dark energy is, but we know it to exist and to have different properties than normal matter and energy do. But, even if you exclude these from my arguments, you still have to explain matter, antimatter, energy, electromagnetic waves and positive, negative and neutrally charged objects, as mentioned above. " This is definitely not how the universe works." And that is so because you say so, right? All scientists are lying to us and telling us that the universe is far more complicated than how we perceive it? That is your argument? An explanation of the twin and clock paradox can be found here: https://www.scientificamerican.com... I also linked you to experiments and articles that prove relativity and the constancy of the speed of light, but I received no answer, apart from "relativity is a total nonsense and Einstein was the biggest fraud who ever lived". Don't expect to win the debate like that. The double slit experiment is not a fraud. A slit does not act like a radio antenna that is able to produce interference fringes in the signals (or electromagnetic waves, to be exact) it is relaying. The signal, when reached the detector, produced interference fringes exactly same to those two waves produce when colliding. Moreover, this experiment has not only been conducted with light waves, but has been repeated using atoms and buckyballs, proving that electromagnetic waves and particles propagate in the same way, namely, wavelike, confirming quantum physics. Concerning the Michelson and Morley experiment, I recognise my mistake on the results, but I also have to correct you on the fact that the results were 8.0 - 8.8 m/s, while the gravitational acceleration is between 9.764 m/s^2 and 9.834 m/s^2 depending on altitude and latitude, with a conventional standard value of exactly 9.80665 m/s^2 (approximately 32.174 ft/s^2). This does not take into account other effects, such as buoyancy or drag. Thus, I do not think it has anything to do with gravity, as, if it did, the results would have the same values as these of the gravitational acceleration. https://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.cellularuniverse.org... I found the article about the fractal universe intriguing, but I do not understand what does it have to do with the debate. The fact that matter concentrates in a fractal-like way implies neither the existence of an ether nor the existence of a sole particle in the universe. The video to which you linked me as a source too has, too, one issue; despite the claims that it constantly makes, it provides no sources. The channel's website states that the source of the videos is a book, which is not available to access through the website (not to mention that the book is written by the same person anyway). I also noticed that, although he intended to disprove relativity, he resorted to personally attacking Einstein and presenting as evidence mere hypotheses or partial truth. All he succeeded in was to provide more explanations to some of the facts that are considered to be in favor of relativity, although some of the former were already proven wrong or were mere assumptions and hypotheses. To say that your hypothesis is the only rational explanation for the universe just because it seemingly simplifies it is most naive. The theories of the scientific community are, as I showed you, plausible and indisputable. On the other hand, you have failed (or rather, have not even attempted) to prove your initial claim. Hence, in this last round, I want you to present and prove your hypothesis of the one particle.