The Total War series of games are better than the Age of Empires series

Thank you for having a fun and civil debate with me, it was fun. I understand you circumstnces but I too have a very limited time. 8:54 PM ET. Tactics:Even though ambushes are a miniscule part of the stategy that goes on in AOE I will still disprove your statement "Ambushes are more easily discovered in AoE, and only a few units can be hidden" How are the more easily discoverd how does it differ from TW. Very little units ? In AOE almost all units, exept calvary can ambush "prey"; they can do this if the ability and skill is bestowed upon them by the motherland/ homecities. AOE also offers a panel which geives palyers the ability to create military formations on troops. Economics:Once again how are the destruction of economics more realistic than the ones in AOE. I have cleary dispoved past arguments on this topic. AOE's economic system is "better" because it gives the player an opportunity to directly have control over the economic stability of a nation. You control every single citizen in you city unlike TW. In AOE you can aslo choose to control larges pieces oif the economy by balancing factories banks and homecity upgrades. In TW you control large states and you never get that micro-economic and macro-economic feeling you get on AOE. Storyline: Again with this storyline argument. Why can't you just accept that AOE has an exelllent well tailored plot. "one can seek pirate gold and fight Custer, creating a situation where the player is involved in several unrelated storylines" Maybe you would produce a valid point if you understood that the PIRATE GOLD plot is from, AOE 3 and that the GEN. CUSTER plot is from AOE 3 Warchiefs, a completely different approach to the game. The first game is set in the 1500s and the second in the 1800s. Big difference, I fail to se how this may confuce players and this is unrelated. FactionsAgain how are they more diverse ? *cricket. .. Cricket. . * I stated why each unit is more diverse than TW in the second round. Plus, AOE provides players with a higly detailed "glossary" within the game that describes each of the unit great depth and describes their special attributes. Some of these DIVERSE units include Shades( which are magical creatures craeted in HADES) Mummies, Phoenix,Leviathan. How more divese can you get ? The AOE units are way superior, they ecompass all aspects of warfare, from historical to mythical ones. Just admit AOE sold more copies :)Additional StorylinesAgain -___- how are they more diverse ? AOE can school TW at everything , but especially diversity. TW only provides historical storylines BORING. AOE provides consumers with BOTH Historical/fiction and Mythical/non-fiction storylines. Ex. AOE 3, AOE2, AOE 1, AOM and AOE W. Price"My Gold Edition of Rome Total War was $20 at gamestop, while at the same gamestop my gold edition of AoE was $40. " Maybe this because the AOE 3 is 1 year older than TWR, it is usual for this price difference. Plus, in 1 year AOE has a game with way. .. better graphics. Search any image of TW R and you can see it is obvious that the price diffrence is justifiable. AOE 3 OnlineI will like to point out that the opponent did not even attempt to defend TW online userface. "Cheats make the games less fair and more one sided" Cheats are OPTIONAL if you want to have lots of fun you can challenge some one to a " cheats on" battle but the game does not count towards your win percentage. Cheats would only be unfair if there was no control over them. Thank you !