Freewill Does NOT Exist and is an illusion brought about by our limited minds

Your definition of free will creates a harsh dualism between fate or things that are 'supposed' to happen vs. things happening out of one discretion or there psychological natural. Both discretion and fate are linked based off decisions someone "makes". These decisions are not "made" but are already determined factors based off someones nature and there nurture . Every human that ever existed abides by two basic factors. Their Nature, that which make up their biology; and their nurture, which is the environment they grow up in. Both these factors rely on other agents for their outcome. If both your parents have a big noses, you will likely have a big, nose ( unless its a recessive gene and/or it skips a generation etc. None the less there is no free will in choosing your biology). If you grow up in a city with high pollution, the effects on your body are pre-determinable as well. So, drawling a parallel between one's discretion (nature) and fate (things that happen based of ones discretion) is flawed. More research is being done in the field of game theory to understand why humans make the decisions we do. Are current lack of understanding, I would categorize under our minds being limited. And yes, once we realize free will is an illusion, I would support a Leviathan of a government since no one would truly be responsible for their actions, but that is another debate for another time. In reference to limited minds, I agree with you that " The mind will never be completely understood" you than add "[S]cientist and others that study it only proving things that are physical, but thoughts, emotions, consciousness are not physical even dreams and that"s just some things in the mind." This is where you are flawed; thoughts, emotions, consciousness and dream are all physical. They are nothing more than chemical and neurological reactions brought about by past events which again obey the laws of physics (chemical reactions) and have predetermining factors that account for them (past events). You then go on a tangent about one world government which I do not have the faintest clue what you are getting out, but I would like to point out the only system that we and everything in existence MUST abide by are that of the laws of physics and the natural world. I would also like to point out that you more or less mention if you know the "law" you can get round it. I agree, that is why many people in the physics and science field do not believe in free will. Einstein even saying "God does not play dice" and Newton believing in a clockwork universe. I am a little confessed on where you stand on human minds limitations. You say that no one believe that a mile could be done in under 4 mins. but also say in the same paragraph that Roger Bannister trained and oblivious BELIEVED that he could. you also say "I agree that the human mind cannot accurately calculate the reactions from the laws of physics? How do we predict something who"s pattern is unknown?" and than blame society for setting these limits that can be broken. Maybe it is you, that is part of the societal problem by setting these limits on things we can not know (physic/ unknown patterns) and than jumping to harsh conclusions such as free will must exist because physics can not know certain things. None the less we can agree that there are limits to the human mind, your are more absolute by saying there are things that we cannot so that is where our free will comes into play. My limits are more vague saying that though we may not know something currently or at all ,that if we could they would be about through the laws of physics (other sciences). I understand that cause and effect is more complicated than I may have presented it but everything abides by cause and effect. In your example the glass could not have been broken if it was made into one in the first place. The human that dropped it could not have been born if it was not for his/her parents meeting. Looking backward at these single event, you would also believe that there is no free will when it comes to this particular glass being broken by that particular person. As said the glass first had to be made into one, the parents of the dropper had to meet, and there parents had to meet , and there parents and so on. The are so many factors at play that it has to pre-determined. if earth would have never formed, if humans never evolved . In fact we would have to trace it all the back to the big bang 13.7 billion years ago. Free will is an illusion brought about by our limited minds!