Brent Musburger Does NOT Deserve the Julia Gillard Reproach!

I am impressed by her abilities to turn this debate into a dramatic re-enactment of the Spanish Inquisition! Now, to clarify some points:1) Gillard and Obama, sitting under a tree. .. Aimee Teegarden “Recent polls have shown that a fifth of Australians can’t locate the POTUS's posterior on a photo. Why do you think this is? ” Miss South Carolina Lauren Caitlin Upton“I personally believe, that Australia Australians,are unable to do so,because uh,some, people out there, in our nation need Julia Gillard. and uh…I believe that our Prime Minister like such as in this photo,and that photo,everywhere like such as (Gillard gropes the POTUS)…and, I believe they should uh,our Prime Minister over here,in the Australia should help the Australia. or should help the POTUS,and should help point to his butt in the photo and give him a smooch so we will be able to build up our future,for us. ” Host Mario Lopez “Thank you very much South Carolina. ”Again, like Gillard flipping the bird, exactly what CON's photos have to do with the resolution is beyond me. The resolution is about comments made by Musburger, and not Gillard groping the POTUS and clearly wanting some "sexy time" with our man in office. I'm left wondering if they got a hotel room. What about Michelle?2) I never said anything about Musburger ogling Katherine Webb. CON is quoting my quoting of the original CNN article, which described people who were offended by Musburger's comments. I made it clear in round #2 and #3 that Musburger's "describing a female's outer appearance in a NON-SEXUAL MANNER is NOT sexist and NOT misogynistic," and "he did not do anything worthy of condemnation in the first place. His statements were neither sexist nor misogynistic. His statements were honest, and not hypocritical. "If anyone is ogling Katherine Webb, it is the boy in the stands sitting next to her (1st video in round #1). Notice he can't take his eyes off her! He even flexes in a move that would make all boys taking their dates to the movies beam with pride. .. c'mon, just put your arm around her. .. DAMN! CAMERA PANNED AWAY! Maybe instead of little boys, Webb could use this wonderful invention! (video #1). http://www.youtube.com...3) About the Julia Gillard Reproach not involving any yelling, I must point out that this is a round #1 definition, one that CON actually rewrote for me as a term for her to accept this debate! I am OFFENDED by this double standard! But I know my opponent won't change. She is capable of a double standard, but incapable of change! Her double standards should not rule this debate!4) The context of Gillard's speech was in preventing a motion to remove Speaker Slipper from his position without due process. The vote in Parliament went in Gillard's favor, 70-69, meaning that Gillard did indeed prevent the motion. Slipper resigned the next day, which is a triumph of due process. Gillard is clearly the winner here. (video #2). http://www.youtube.com...And now to close. .. My argument is clear and concise. Brent Musburger does NOT deserve the Julia Gillard Reproach! He has done nothing wrong! People are getting worked up over nothing. The camera panned to Katherine Webb, and Musburger had to say something. .. would you focus on Miss Alabama, or the quarterback's mom? WOW SHE'S BEAUTIFUL! Even the boy next to her can't take his eyes off her! My opponent has sought to bring about the Australian Inquisition by demanding that Musburger sit through 15 minutes of torturous condemnation (CON's word, not mine! ), all the while having to sit there and take it, EVEN IF HE'S NOT GUILTY OF ANYTHING. CON has not contested that Musburger's language was appropriate, and that one can appropriately use the word "beautiful" to describe family members INCLUDING YOUR OWN GRANDDAUGHTER. When CON states that "either Musburger meant to be offensive, or he didn't," I envision priests and monks in Spain turning the winch on the rack of their hapless victim. OH, YOU THINK THIS 15 MINUTES IS ALL YOU'RE GONNA GET DO YOU? IT'S JUST BEGINNING! DID YOU MEAN TO BE OFFENSIVE? TELL THE TRUTH! AND IF YOU DO, I WILL EVISCERATE YOUR REPUTATION QUICKLY AND NOT DRAG IT OUT ANY MORE THAN NECESSARY. BECAUSE THIS IS NECESSARY, BELIEVE YOU ME! Does Musburger DESERVE any of this? Of course not. Therefore, VOTE YES FOR PRO, AND VOTE NO FOR K-POP!