Atheism is Stupidity and Based on Imaginings having no Basis in Facts.

Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive! Sir Walter Scott Con - Prove that I've not been looking. You can't. I claim that I have been looking. Proof con is untruthful, and has NOT ever been a theist, or looking for any God. Prevaricator! Con supports: 1.Implicit atheism. 2. Supporting islamic terrorist.- What kind of thing are you, that you support terrorist? 3. Supporting Pedophiles not be stigmatized. – You support child rapist? What animal are you? 4. Supporting Pedophiles should be treated with more respect.- You support child rapist? What animal are you? 5. Children 5 years or older should be allowed to consent to sexual activity. – You would turn 5 year ol children into sex objects? Then turn Pedophiles loose on our children? Couldn’t FIND God you say? Color ME Shocked! Really, you couldn’t find God …. I wonder why? 6. Known alleged rape victims should not immediately be believed.- You’ve NO DECENCY! Why would God acknowledge you? 7. Incestuous marriages should be legal. – You’ve no morality what so ever. No restraint, seeking Fleshly desires, not Godly! Trickster 8. Transgendered people are mentally ill. http://www.debate.org... 90 Debates ….. only 7 on religion and ALL against! So much for your : Con- All of my experiences indicate that atheists have tried all of the same things theists have done in order to find evidence. Con- I was actually once a theist, and I am constantly in search of evidence. - fabricator, fibber, storyteller Con- I ask others for evidence because I have yet to find any.- Deciever Con- so I ask them to present it in hopes that they have something which proves a god exists.- Oh Please, false witness, perjurer Con- Science relies on multiple people corroborating, so that's what I do when I ask someone for evidence.- trickster, slicker, cheat Con-, I've been doing work for a long time on finding out if a god exists….. Uh-huh, RIGHT! And if I had wheels, I’d be a wagon? You’ve no experiences, I suppose you tried Muslim, cause you denied them too …. When did you ever go to their mosque and study? Have you even been in a church at all? Other than when you were a child? You’ve been lying this whole debate! EVERYONE knows YOU HAVE to seek God for yourself, no one FINDS God for you or anyone else. Only a simpleton or a person who’s never looked for Him would NOT know this? 1.lack of empirical evidence FACT-atheist refuse to look FOR evidence themselves in all cases, demanding instead that it be done for them. However, once provided they reject outright, the evidence provided. This I submit has been proven by your own actions and words! Denies given evidence AS evidence. Con - There is no work involved. If you've already found evidence of a god, all you'd have to do is present it. Con -No, I just ignored it Con- I argue that there is nothing which cannot be falsified. Con- Indeed, and I am one of them. I have yet to find any evidence of a god with my searching. People believing in something is not evidence it exists. Con -That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.- Just a Deer in the headlights, aren't you? Con- Either way, what you said is baseless, as you provided no evidence that atheists refuse to look for evidence – You don’t why would they? Con- All of my experiences indicate that atheists have tried all of the same things theists have done in order to find evidence. Yeah …. Your experiences, uh-huh? Note* Can't find God UNLESS YOU really LOOK! – YOU DID NOT LOOK! – Prevaricator Con - There is no work involved. If you've already found evidence of a god, all you'd have to do is present it. Still wanting me to do the work for you huh? .... No I won't! 2. The problem of evil: FACT- atheist ARE the performers of Evil! Course once they’re in prison, they do get religious, quick, fast and in a hurry don’t they. Con- Note how my opponent once again offers unsubstantiated claims. No evidence whatsoever of this and in my research, something he just complained about? I forget, atheist HAVE no common sense. My mistake. it's like the definition of stupid which by all appearances Con doesn't know, unless dictionary open to the page, by someone else of course. Over the past thirty years, the rise in violent crime parallels the rise in families abandoned by fathers. High-crime neighborhoods are characterized by high concentrations of families abandoned by fathers. The rate of violent teenage crime corresponds with the number of families abandoned by fathers. The type of aggression and hostility demonstrated by a future criminal often is foreshadowed in unusual aggressiveness as early as age five or six. The future criminal tends to be an individual rejected by other children as early as the first grade who goes on to form his own group of friends, often the future delinquent gang. On the other hand: Neighborhoods with a high degree of religious practice are not high-crime neighborhoods. Even in high-crime inner-city neighborhoods, well over 90 percent of children from safe, stable homes do not become delinquents. Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE), former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a major sponsor of the recent crime bill, summed up the predominant view of crime prevention: Likewise, the Department of Justice's report, "Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent and Chronic Juvenile Offenders," accurately diagnoses the roots of the problem (in terms of family, religion, and moral formation), Amid the social collapse of so many urban neighborhoods, there are stunning examples of successful efforts to turn around the lives of young people previously immersed in crime. These efforts invariably possess two features. One is a strong system of rules within an organization characterized by the love and firm guidance seen in a supportive family. The other is a strong spiritual dimension, most commonly a profound religious commitment. http://www.heritage.org... I doubt he ever even looked in his alleged intense study, I found this in like 30 seconds. Obviously to labor intense for liar, liar pants on fire there. Con - I've not found anything that confirms atheists convert once in prison. Just do a google search yourself, and you'll see there is nothing on the matter of people converting once in prison. Again no common sense .... Sigh. Never found cause never LOOKED, -trickster Protestant: 50.6%, Catholic 14.5%, No religious preference: 10.6%, Muslim 9.4%, Unknown 5.0%, Native American 2.7%, Jewish 1.7%, Pagan earth based 1.7%, Other non-Christian 1.5%, Buddhist 0.9%, Mormon 0.8%, Orthodox Christian 0.4%, Hindu 0.2%= 84.4% Religious inmates. Non religious + unkown =15.6% inmate population Yeah to me another two seconds to find this statistic. I’m beginning to think Con is on the isle of Patmos. https://www.statista.com... 3. The rejections of concepts that cannot be falsified: Con - There is no work involved. If you've already found evidence of a god, all you'd have to do is present it. Con -I argue that there is nothing which cannot be falsified. – (Yeah there’s a shock, he might have had to LOOK huh?.) I think the answer for this question is obvious - makes excuses to reject concepts! Note* Direct evidence that Con and all other atheist, “NEVER BOTHERED TO LOOK” demanding empirical evidence, but refusing to acknowledge them even when they cannot BE DENIED! Con -None of the quotes you offered from me is evidence that I never bothered to look. Again, baseless claims. (as has been established and demonstrated Atheist DO NOT LOOK!) Con -That hasn't been established actually. You offered no scientific study on whether atheists look for evidence, no examples, etc. The man has excuses for everything, to give him a reason NOT to research. YOU ARE my example pedophile supporter, child sex supporter…. Already on last rounding here, and you’ve provided nothing but your mouth! And of course some sicko ideas! .Many atheist hold that atheism is a more parsimonious worldview than Theism: FACT- 6.67 Billion Theist is hemispheres away from 1.1 Billion atheist, clearly had one BOTHERED to live in the real world rather than the cage of their mind, thay would have easily known THE TRUTH. Nope not the atheist, their just on cruise control through life, until of course they crash and yes BURN! Snap out of it people, before it’s too late! YOU ARE NOT THE WORLD VIEW ATHEIST. Theist IS the worldview, UNDENIABLE, in accordance with requirement for Burden of proof, it falls to YOU, to show “God doesn’t exist” and that atheism is the correct view, not our Burden, because we are the status quo, NOT YOU! Con -I think you don't know what parsimonious means. What you said here makes no sense at all pertaining to what parsimonious means: It means, "Very unwilling to spend money or use resources"[4] What you said doesn't have anything to do with spending money or resources. Again, my mistake, forgot I was talking to an atheist, with no common sense, should have known I’d HAVE to look for him! Duh! LOOK HERE---------> Occam's razor (also Ockham's razor; Latin: lex parsimoniae "law of parsimony") https://en.wikipedia.org... is a problem-solving principle attributed to William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347), who was an English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher and theologian. In the scientific method, Occam's razor is not considered an irrefutable principle of logic or a scientific result; Con - if I said a cheetah is orange, that is not defining the cheetah as orange, it's describing its attributes. Uh- yeah, AND? Uh …. Cheetah, large predator of the feline family, Orange a color, associated with pumpkins, oranges etc not difficult. Stupid, one who is careless in reason, Unintelligent, in mannerisms of speech or thought. Unable to grasps ideas in context …… uh …… Con and other atheists! See? not too hard for you to reasonably follow, was it? So “WHY” didn’t you?