"why technology is prudent despite the effect on enviroment"

Thankyou for being an honorable debat buddy. good luck to you with the votes. :) MY OPPONENT- "As you all know school is a big part of your life right? It's a way to focus on your future" Yes it surely is. one thing i was trying to point out to you for the duration of this debate. MY OPPONENT- "The reason that out school decided to move to an all technology base program was only done because, of the recent affects that this may have in us in the future. However this isn't the way for all of the students in my school. Our schools main point is "project base learning"; they believe that they use in technology and working in a group will be a better benefit in the future. The class of 2011 was the first to enter Rochester High, but with a twist the use in technology and the pressure to work in groups that wasn't the only thing that our had to work with but our teaches where also inexperienced in what they were doing many of the teachers didn't know what to do as project and how to use the technology (there was a time when the student showed the class how to use the program rather then the teacher). They believed that a student is more into the modern technology and the wanted to incorporate that to make class a little more interesting. I must admit that it worked." Not only does my opponent help further my side with this, but she also goes on to admit that it has worked. my opponent then goes on to say MY OPPONENT- "You see, though the problem doesn't seem to be the technology but way that it is taught" again thankyou for helping my case. You see? no problem in technology, just those who teach it at her high school. This also pertains to her example with the unruly group of kids. MY OPPONENT- "I will admit that I have no prove on global warming, how ever what you hear on the news or see on an ad makes a good point we know that global warming is out there but we do nothing to prevent it" dear paramore102, are you claiming that the media now presents fact? Just because you hear something on the news does not make it true. especially in this new era of time. No, the media is biased. However this seems to be the problem with America. We seem to think everything we hear on television is true. pity. MY OPPONENT-"Al Gore is making billions to get word out that global warming dose exists" EXACTLY my point. How can you not see this? that one man's selfishness can turn the whole beliefs? MY OPPONENT-"I would like to let my opponent know that in order to make a statement such as the one that it may just need to take someone that people know of have made in some way a better influence to people or maybe it just takes someone with determination." Actually this is not the case. Any one with enough money can make such statements. and the problem is, that we americans are gullible enough to fall for anything. We have a negitive way of thinking. We like to look at all the problems in the world rather than whats being done for the world. Now that i have finished attacking my opponents case, i would like to point out all my dropped points. ME- "The atmoshpere Goes down, the polar ice caps go off balance, then re-build on either sides of the earth. Even as we speak, our polar ice caps our melting. Of course i will be billions of years before the big melt down, but still, it has happened in the past. And Did you ever hear of teh global freezing theory? It was a big deal in the 1930's. But that whole thing was proved wrong. Theory's don't get us anywhere." My opponent has dropped this point, meaning that it still holds undenyable cause for my case. ME-"my opponents last paragraph, says that internet takes up alot of energy. i understand that. i have from the beginning. but i thought the point of this debate was for you to tell me how the enviroment was more important than technology, and why this technology is less prudent than the enviroment." My opponent also refuses to show me how technology is less prudent than the enviroment in any way. She has basically only told me that its bad on the enviroment, and that there's trouble with it in school. Given these are the only things pointed out and that my opponent has failed to show me how enviroment is more prudent than technology, i urge any readers to vote for my cause. Thank you for a fun and easy debate, paramore102. kudos fo-shizzle