The American Invasion of Afghanistan was justifiable.

Thank you for your somewhat prompt reply. First of all, I am sorry that I may have made you angry. I apologize for that, yet is it necessary to fire back something else?...>>So I have been quite disappointed with your insults and you are nowhere close to winning this debate for it is just a mere illusion that you have. The reason why I left my opening statement without much detail is because I had the belief that my opponent would know the basis of the debate topic and be able to infer and know the facts of the invasion. Once again, I state that I have never mentioned that it was the sovereign state of Afghanistan itself that attacked us. Terrorists (which I also have not said were from Afghanistan) that attacked the United States on 9/11 fled to Afghanistan and after many attempts in diplomatic negotiations with the Taliban, refused to extradite the known terrorists. Next, could you possibly clarify this sentence?->>Second How could the invasion of Afghanistan be an act of self-defence when it was Afghanistan who attacked for an unknown reason. If it was self-defence then what or who attacked them? Your next argument states >>But they did directly attack the US even if it was terrorists from Afghanistan because otherwise they would have given up the terrorists and admitted it. In rebuttal to this point, Afghanistan itself did not attack the United States. Just because Afghanistan didn't give up the terrorists doesn't mean that Afghanistan attacked us. Afghanistan at the time was under the control of a known terrorist organization, the Taliban. When al-Qaeda, another terrorist group, sought refuge, the Taliban welcomed them with open arms as brothers and defended al-Qaeda, and refused to extradite them to the US. Next you state that the United States did not wait to attack Afghanistan. This is wrong. We did wait. There was enough time to have a tape from al-Qaeda released taking full responsibility for the attacks. There was enough time for the government to form several committees confirming that Afghanistan was the place of refuge for al-Qaeda and that al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden were responsible for the attacks. There was also enough time for a vote in the United Nation, one that ended up with full support for the American and British invasion of Afghanistan, even though the United Nations is notoriously known for a pacifist stance. If Mexicans are not the same as Afghans, why mention them? You state that Newsweek showed pictures of Afghanistan before and after. Before and after what? The American invasion? The Taliban invasion? The Soviet invasion? The Ottoman invasion? You do not need to be more specific because this point is irrelevant anyways. The aftermath of the American invasion of Afghanistan is not part of whether or not the American invasion of Afghanistan was justified in the first place. I agree that the aftermath was not planned thoroughly but that does not mean that the initial American invasion was not justified. This point therefore no longer is relevant and should no longer be discussed. I will not comment on your debate, but to recapitulate, I shall state that I have refuted all of my opponent's rebuttals and arguments and successfully defended my own points. Thank you. Good day/afternoon/evening.