Prophet Muhammad (sawa) is Prophesied in The Bible

Julia said "Do you really think you refuted my claims? I'm sorry, I don't want to offend you but you proved nothing except your ignorance. Do you even read my whole arguments? You're just an obstinate one"like Walid ibn Ughbah, the uncle of Abu Jahl. Don't forget that I am ex-Christian. I know everything about the Bible. But you are new Christian. What do you know about Christianity? No wonder you can't understand my points."My response: The fact that Julia is getting pissed off tells me that she has no coherent response to what I am saying, just remember something folks, when your opponent snaps at you just like she did to me and insults me proves that she has NO response to anything I have said, so keep it up Julia, continue insulting me, that won't change the fact that your prophet is a false prophet. LOL!Julia said "It's interesting that you call me mushrik if I believe that Muhammad is God (Maadhallah), but you yourself clearly said that Jesus is God. You yourself make excuse to deny your shirk but it doesn't wipe out your sin.My response: I never said that Muslims say that Muhammad is God...show me at any point in this debate that I even made that claim, see, now you're just putting words into my mouth in my presence.Julia said "And It's funny that when Christians can't explain a prophecy, they start talking about Jesus 2nd coming. What do you know about it? Do you think you can disprove my claims by talking about Jesus' 2nd coming? It just shows your ignorance. Don't be obstinate. Confess the truth instead of denying it."My response: Ad hominem after ad hominem, when will it stop Julia, this is a debate, not an immature playground where we go around insulting people who disagree with us, if you can't keep your cool, then debating is not for you. You even believe in the second coming of Christ, so how are you even trying to object to it. If Christ isn't coming again, Islam is false. LOL! Shows my ignorance? Honey, it's called facts, confess the truth instead of denying it? Yeah, I confess the truth that Muhammad is not in the Bible.Julia said "According to the Dictionary of the Bible, under the word Teman, page 961, it states, Teman is a large oasis in the north of Medina. Arabia's social, political and moral aspects demanded a reformer. The prophecies testify for it."My response: My god, you just keep insisting that Teman is where your false prophet preached. I'll grant you for the sake or argument that Teman is Medina, just because how desperate you are...but you still haven't proved the passage is talking about a prophet FROM Teman, nowhere does the passage say "Teman is where the prophet is from" Nor does it even hint at it, it just mentions it in the passing. How desperate do you have to be....find a word that supposedly means "Medina" then you jump on it. Julia said "You yourself told me not to quote Islamic sources to support my claims, so I proved Paran is Mecca through Bible and I wrote my references in my 2nd argument. Have you even read it?"My response: Julia, if you insist that Paran is Mecca, fine, but as I said before....no passage in the Bible says that there is going to be a prophet from Paran, Deuteronomy 33 is talking about the LORD (not Muhammad) coming to Mount Sinai and giving the revelation to Moses and the nation. Habakkuk 3 as I already said in my previous rebuttal is talking about God, the passage says "God" Not Muhammad, so for the life of me, I don't know why you as a Muslim are takng passages that talk about God and applying them to Muhammad. Julia said "So This Paran must have been of great importance. And it would not be so unless it was the place that received the final revelation - the birthplace of the seal of prophets and the center of the new message."My response: Julia just comitted the fallacy known as non-sequitur, which is when you provide a premise, then follow that up with a false conclusion. For example: The ground is wet, therefore, today is the worst day of my life. It's when you jump from a premise to a conclusion that doesn't follow. How exactly does it follow from "Paran is of great importance" that "Muhammad is a true prophet"? Maybe instead of trying to fool gullible people with your fallacies, actually present better arguments.Julia said "1. In Deuteronomy 33:2, we see Moses that God will execute His Holy Judgement in the city of Paran by 10000 Believers: "And he said, The LORD came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from mount Paran, and he came with ten thousands of saints: from his right hand"went a fiery law for them."My response: This passage says nothing about a prophet to come...just read what you quoted, it's in past tense, and more importantly, it's saying something that the LORD did, the LORD is the subject of this passage, this is indisputable, so trying to fit this and apply it to Muhammad is to ignore what the passage is saying.Julia said "Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about them: 'See, the Lord is coming with thousands upon thousands of his holy ones. to judge everyone, and to convict all of them of all the ungodly acts they have committed in their ungodliness, and of all the defiant words ungodly sinners have spoken against him." (Jude 1:14-15)"My response: Julia, did you even read what the pssage you are quoting is saying??? It is yet again in the past tense, because it is talking about something Enoch prophesied, he prophesied about the revelation of the Torah to Moses and the nation, this has nothing to do with Muhammad or his supposed revelations. The passage is very clear, it is talking about The LORD coming to Mt. Sinai and giving the revelation to the nation of Israel, not Muhammad.Julia said "If Muhammad who liberated Mecca with 10000 believers wasn't the one who fulfilled this prophecy, then who was that Prophet?"My response: For the last time already.........this passage is NOT (is NOT{IS NOT}) talking about a prophet, it is talking about the LORD, do you believe Muhammad is the LORD, well good for you, becasue you are now a disbeliever according to your own scripture.Julia said "2. We read in the Bible, "God came from Teman, the Holy One from Mount Paran. His glory covered the heavens and his praise filled the earth." (Habakkuk 3:3)"My response: I already responded to this claim about 3 times now....the passage is talking about GOD, is Muhammad God? "the Holy One" is a name for God in the Bible, so again if you think this is Muhammad, then you are equating your prophet with God and just committed shirk. Notice, I am not saying Muslims believe Muhammad is God. But what you'e doing by saying a passage talking about God is actually talking about Muhammad is you're equating Muhammad with God.Julia said "the Prophet's emigration and the events of his arrival were prophesied in Isaiah; "A prophecy against Arabia: You caravans of Dedanites, who camp in the thickets of Arabia, bring water for the thirsty; you who live in Tema, bring food for the fugitives. They flee from the sword, from the drawn sword, from the bent bow and from the heat of battle. " (Isaiah 25:13-15)My response: Isaiah 25:13-15 doesn't even exist, so what exactly are you quoting?Julia said "All these verses prove that the Promised Prophet in Deut. 18:18 and John 1:19-21 is an Arab from Paran and the term "Brethren" means "A male offspring having only one parent in common with another offspring.". Since Prophet Muhammad is an Arab and has a direct blood relationship with Ishmael, then all these prophecies only fits him."My response: How exactly does the Biblical acrobatics you just did prove Muhammad is the brethren of the Israelites, for the love of God, I already said this 3 times now....anytime the Old Testament says "brethren" without qualification it ALWAYS refers to a fellow Israelite among the 12 tribes. So you have to demonstrate that from the context of Deuteronomy 18 that "brethren" means "Ishmaelite" especially when the ordinary meaning of the term is not "Ishmaelite". The very same book of Deutetronomy defines "brethren" as "a non-foreigner (i.e an Israelite)" (Deuteronomy 17:15). So how can you insist on something, when the very book you are quoting refutes your interpretation...Julia said "And about the stone, you claim that Jesus quoted Psalm to applied to himself. Are you sure? Can you read his mind?"My response: Uhm...because Jesus said so? Anytime Jesus says a parable, he is illustrting a point, the parable of the stone is clearly about Jesus, the context makes that clear, I am not just guessing, Jesus is clear as day that the rejected stone is himself, how he is talking about Muhammad is beyond me.Julia said "Here you can read the story of a Rabbi who testified that Muhammad was foretold by Moses http://librarun.org...;My response: This story just demonstrates to me how desperate Muslims are, instead of actually pointing out the prophecies that talk about Muhammad, they have to resort to a made up story of a Rabbi who supposedly said Muhammad is foretold. There are obvious things wrong with the story that I notice...first of all, which prophecies did this "Rabbi" who I doubt was a Rabbi, point to? He didn't cite a single verse, which tells me that this story is a fabrication.And just for the record, how does the testimoy of this one Rabbi prove Muhammad is a true prophet? I can find thousands of Rabbis who say Muhammad is not prophesied in their scriptures, will you then accept their testimony over the testimony of this lone Rabbi? Stop appealing to authority and actually give me your evidence from the scriptures. Appealing to authority proves what exactly.Julia said "You have failed to refute my claims so far. Don't worry, I don't blame you."My response: LOL! I've already refuted EVERYTHING you said, so what are you talking about? I guess you're too delusional to see that.