A creator exists

I must just point out your 2nd contention in your opening statement. You do in fact claim that absence of proof is proof of absence. Yet you claim you never made such a statement. You seem to be contradicting yourself. The objective truth of any concept can be confirmed by the fact that it will never contradict itself. The problem with logic is that it evolves as science reveals more evidence. unlike religious beliefs which are written in stone, so to speak. Its easy to say ignorance was the cause that the logical conclusion was mistaken but as yet, logic has no explanation for creation. Neither how, nor why. If the very foundation of logic is built on ignorance then logic is no better than any other religion. It is merely a belief system, based on ignorance. 2 black holes, 2 white holes... Where did these black holes and white holes come from? Who or what created them? These are merely diversionary tactics and not valid explanations for creation. Its basically claiming we are in a simulation and the programmer created us. Well who created the programmer? Back to square one. As Con seems unable or unwilling to answer the question Why he doesn't believe TRUTH exists, I will answer it for him. So far, every religious belief in God contradicts itself. Therefore logic determines they are false beliefs. Con also believes in free will. He believes mas is responsible for his own actions and will be judged accordingly. Judged not by God, because God does not exist, but rather judged by those who know him. The idea that his actions are predestined by some omnipotent being is impossible for him to accept. Therefore TRUTH does not exist. Cons belief makes TRUTH impossible. As noboby can offer a valid theory for creation, I will do so. I call it time fluctuation theory on creation. The biggest problem with any theory of creation is time. If time started with the big bang, no time existed before the Big Bang and therefore nothing could have caused the big bang. So far science has determined nothing capable of travelling back in time to create the Big Bang. So the universe itself could not create itself. But everyone seems to make one logical conclusion, namely, that time travels at a set speed and is one directional. This is merely based on subjective observation. We have no objective means to measure how fast time travels as we exist only in one instant of time. Any past is merely memory and any future is merely a imaginary construct of the mind. Time could in fact be standing still and we wouldn't know it. I know that's complicated so I'll try to simplify it with a mathematical equasion. Y/X=1. Where Y is our perception of time passing and X is the actual speed of time passing. If X is halved, so is Y. So we get half Y/half X = 1. Likewise 2Y/2X = 1. No matter what speed time travels at, we will always perceive it to be constant. Well my contention is that time is slowing down. To prove this we need to look back in time. And we can. Light travels at a set speed. Although fast, it still takes time to travel. The further away an object is, the further back in time we are looking. If rays from a star take 200 years to get here then we are in fact looking back in time 200 years. The outer limits of the universe are very far away and therefore, way back in time, from our perspective. If I am right we would expect to see things travelling faster than they should. Well guess what... they do. Scientists have observed that the universe is expanding faster than it should when science dictates it shiuld be slowing down. Lol imagine their suprise when nature seems to defy science. But what does it mean? Time is slowing down. Something is exerting force on time to slow it down. Eventually time will stop and start running backwards. Everything will return to the moment of creation and this gives the singularity the energy it needs to repeat the cycle. The big bang happens again. No creator is needed.