Everybody believes in a worldview!

ForewardI will accept to enter this debate versus Mr. crede as long as we remain true to the resolution that "Everybody believes in a worldview". Everybody should be defined as all peoples, worldview should be defined as 2. A collection of beliefs about life and the universe held by an individual or a group- the free dictionary. The key word will be believe/belief which Miriam Webster defines as to accept something as true, genuine, or real. I now move on to my case. Disclaimer, sources need not count for or against as long as no statistical claims are made.Con PositionContention 1 - skepticism We must first look to the concepts of skepticism. Instead of scientific or religious, we turn to pyrrhonism and academic skepticism which states that knowledge of truth is impossible and we should refrain from making truth claims. When we look to the resolution we see the claim "Everybody believes in a worldview" it becomes clear the con need only prove the possibility or give example of how a sole/one belief free person may exist to prevail in these rounds. Looking to academic skepticism the idea is expressed that the knowledge of truth is impossible. According to the prior stated definition, to believe would require the acceptance of truth of something but this is negated. Now the claim could then be asserted that one believes in academic skepticism but it goes hand in hand with pyrrhonism. This makes truth claims (such as one "believes in academic skepticism") non-plausible and ultimately outside the philosophy. These views have existed since pre-A.D. times and were even similar to Platonism. To reject the possibility of existence of a single belief free individual over nearly 3 millenia is ridiculous. Rejection of a claim may be a belief under some definitions but the mindset that there is no absolute truths is a middle ground with no acceptance but an eternally open perspective.Contention 2 - isolation and illusion of belief When we look to the term worldview we are recognizing ideas that are either held by majority and or permeate the globe. To claim everyone has a belief in a world view ignores all individuals in isolated climates and regions. We can look to African tribes and to see that in such a community the outside world even until modern day is not known to exist . Cases also exist where certain peoples where forced to be kept in solitude such as basements or closets by abusive adults or parent ending many time in a global shut out and children who receive no education. More examples include children who never receive any form of education,those who become comatose, severely mentally handicapped, and split personality persona's that are self aware but only represent repressed parts of ones active self. Now onto the illusion of belief, we can first look to elements of hard and soft determinism that tell us that bio-chemical impulses in our brain coupled with our outside environment cause many of the actions and beliefs of man. Hard determinism would suggest all are controlled. Even if the science is rejected many cases of indoctrination exist and we consider those manipulated or brainwashed. So it shows that forced beliefs are still not our own or personal.Contention 3 - Religious aspects Finally, we look at the religious aspect which is not included in the resolution but discussed. It is quite possible and cases are in existence of people with no opinion at all of religion or no education of any religion. If the outside world defines said individual in a class or group that in no way means the individual being judged has a belief, simply that others do. Religion and metaphysics are terms tossed around by the highly educated but we can still look back to an uneducated or skeptic mindset and see them both debunked as components or all self aware and or self recognizing being. Conclude In conclusion the con side rests for now and turns the floor back to pro for rebutting. Good luck to pro.