WAR DEBATE: Russian Federation (Pro) vs. China (Con)

1) Unfortunately for my opponent there was an organized defense of entreched soilders after round 2 and 3, including infrustructure, treches, and fortified artillery. Khravostok can't yse AFVs and they are surrounded and under siege. Also, I would like to point out the Russians had very luttle infantry or tank numbers to match the Chinese, and what they had were poorly supplied due to a lacking infrustructure.2) Khracostok was surrounded, meaning everything around it was Chinese. The Russians cannot mass in tanks and food though heavily guarded Chinese territory. The group in Manchuria is also surrounded and couldn't be supplied anyhow.3) The Chinese reserves could last a few days, and it wouldnt be hard at all thank's to Chinese control of the seas. I would also like to point out I did train my infantry in a previous turn, and theoretically there was 81,000,000 men I could enlist in the army. It is the Russians who wouldn't be able to kill an army bigger than they are considering the margin of how much Russians were sent (and realistically supplier) Lastly, the Russian offensive was NOT "so sucessful". The Chiense ended uo surrounding them, but that's here nor there. I would again point out my opponent completely ignored mymoves and somehow blitzed halfway to Beijing. The Chinese indeed were ready, I again precisely mentioned they were entrenching and such. Furthermore, The Chinese would never have to defend Beijing; there was an offensive going on everywhere around the Russians. This is ACTUALLY what we have at the end of the last turn- Vladivostok under Chinese control- Kharavostok starving and has no supplies- Kamchatka under Chinese control-The Russian offensive either teetring out or NOT happening due to the Russians being surrounded and being attacked everywhere, with very little manpower and virtually no reserves. -The Chinese either waiting untill the Russians run out of supplies or forcing there way in the big circle , destroying the Russian force and oushing on into siberia. The Russians would be destroyed and surrounded with no prospect of even trying to take Beijing. Thus, Beijing cannot realistically be crushed as the Chinese are fortified and outnumber the Russians (who magically managed to never run out of a very small number of manpower without a single reinforcement). The Russians are surrounded in a giant hole and would be crushed in it being attacked from every side, including from Beijing. My opponent's scenario is completely impossible under these circumstances. Also, the Chinese wont fall because of Russian numbers; millions were being sent to the Manchurian front. Again, The Russians never reinforced their small army. The Russians have a choice of signing the treaty or being crushed for there aggression. They have made a mistake in neglecting the navy; allowing the Chinese to land behind the lines and surround the Russian force trying to invade Mabchuria. From there the victory was assured as the Chinese could stave out the Russians or move in from all fronts with the Russian attempt to attacking an entrenched Beijing while being attacked everywhere else by superior forces (essentialy by number) failing. The Chinese would eventually close the hole with sheer attrition if nessesary (as they can reinforce the army not being surrounded) and destroy the Russian army, counterattacking deep into Siberia and forcing a Russian surrender. I would like to emphizize once more that the Russians cannot realistically attack Beijing being surrounded and attacked from all fronts by a superior amount of men, especially as the Chinesr at Beijing are entrenched. Furthermore, My Opponent has conceeded this round, meaning my default he signed the treaty and surrendered to China.