Abortion is wrong

Accepted.Abortion StatisticsBefore debating the "ethics" of abortion, we should specify when it is that most abortion procedures occur. This is important as it determines whether what is being aborted is to be classified as a zygote, an embryo, or a fetus. According to statistics, the majority of abortions take place within the first trimester. [1.] https://i.imgur.com...As the graph states, 38% of abortions occur in the first 7-8 weeks, 21% occur in the 9th-10th weeks, 16% occur in the 6th week, whereas only 22% occur after this (including 4% in weeks 16-20). Therefore, in most cases, it is usually the zygote or embryo that is aborted, as opposed to the fetus. The zygote (which is one single-cell) develops within the first two-weeks of pregnancy. Upon this, it divides into a small collection of cells and becomes an embryo. These cells remain an "embryo" until the ninth week, which is when a fetus begins to develop. Given that it is indeed the zygote or embryo that is aborted, we can conclude that a.) the cells being removed are yet to develop any organs and b.) the cells being removed cannot be categorized as persons. The extent of "life" within these cells is that they are "alive" in the sense they will continue to develop under the right conditions. They are not conscious or sentient beings (their existence and developmental potential is dependant on who is carrying them). A fully-developed fetus, on the other hand, can survive without the internal support of its mother upon being born. Is Removing Cells Wrong?Definition of a person:1.) a human being regarded as an individual.If we are to argue for or against abortion within the zygote-embryo stage of the pregnancy, we are not arguing as to whether it is wrong to kill a person, as the zygote and embryo do not fulfill the criteria for personhood. Thus, we are essentially arguing the ethics of removing a biological cell or cells which is/are not wanted. Definition of a cell: 2.) the smallest structural and functional unit of an organism, which is typically microscopic and consists of cytoplasm and a nucleus enclosed in a membrane.Any cell, has the potential for development or division. These same cells can also die. An example of this would be how our brain cells slowly diminish as we become older. [2.] https://imgur.com...To expound on my point on the removal of cells that people do not "want" or cells that are not viewed to be beneficial to the individual: the practice of this is not uncommon. The difference between a cell(s) and a newly-born child is that the former only has the potential of life, whereas the latter has a life -- in that it can live and survive as one separate being (on the contrary to being biologically dependant on its mother). This is the stage in which the fetus, which is now a newly-born infant, is granted "rights" -- with the primary right being the right to life. It is now considered a person, and is protected by the law. A cell or a group of cells, however, are not capable of thought or feeling as individual biological units. The "potential of life" argument simply fails as all cells have the potential of life, as they also have the potential of death. That the zygote and the embryo have the potential of life only means that they are, in essence, the same as every other cell. Their continued existence and development isn't guaranteed, and, rather more importantly, they are not conscious beings. A group of cells can lead to a conscious being (I.e person), but they, as cells which are still yet to develop, are not conscious beings.I would ask that Pro answer this question: is it wrong to remove cells?