God Is Fake

As I open this up, I’d like to point out that it is possible to prove a negative. The simplest example would be “prove that 16 is not a prime number”.The proof is incredibly simple. Prime numbers are wholly divisible by themselves and 1 exclusively. 16mod2 = 0 therefore 16 isn’t a prime number. I’ve just proved a negative statement.No one is ever guaranteed to disprove every imaginable hypothesis about nature though; I have a feeling that this is what you are getting at when you say “he must be able to prove a negative”. I would argue that you were committing the same crime that you accused me of, when you said. “It is impossible for him to win this debate.” You are planning to prove that negative statement true throughout the course of this debate, just like you accuse me of trying to prove a negative statement. That is blatant hypocrisy. In order to win the debate, all I have to do is get more votes than you. Are you 100% certain that I’m going to lose? No you aren’t, because the resulting vote count being in my favour is well within the realm of possibility.---It’s possible that there could be a universal creator, and it’s possible there could not be. That’s why I’m trying to emphasize that what “God” is, is nothing more than a word which paints an extravagent picture in the mind, and the artist is cognitive fallacy.I have the BoP to show why God is fake. My proof will become apparent to anyone who does not overthink. Literally, all I am saying is that what the word means, and what we think it means, are 2 different things. We think it means “all-powerful creator of the universe who exists somehow”. What it actually means is “fictional mythological character”. The strange parallel world that the all-powerful creator exists in is just our minds. In reality, there’s simply no evidence for him.I’ll do an analogy with Bigfoot. Bigfoot is a fictional creature and it’s pretty obvious how he was fabricated. He’s supposedly a half-man, half-ape that walks upright, but he has never been scientifically confirmed. It’s easy to see how people came up with the idea though. Some guy saw something move through the bushes and filled in the rest (The brain is notorious for that; is there a square in the picture below for example?). Then other people’s brains started doing the same thing, except they hadn’t even seen the thing in the bushes, they just heard the bewildered woodsman describe his close encounter with an unknown creature. The creature was probably a rabbit startled by its own fart or a leaf falling off a tree and landing on its head.God has the same kind of origins as Bigfoot. No one really knows who the first man was to say “There’s a God in the sky who created everything and has almighty power over us all”, but no such being has actually been observed (just like no Bigfoot has ever been observed). One of our ancestors was probably out in a field and saw lightning, and his brain incorrectly filled in the rest. It was just a static discharge, but our poor ancestor thought it was an angry man in the sky hurling blazing arrows down at earth. ---If you agree that Bigfoot is fake, you should also agree that God is fake. Round 2 off to you.