Resolved: God Exists

Rebuttals: The Big BangAccording to the physicist Alex Filippenko of the University of California, energy can be produced by random, uncaused quantum fluctuations. These fluctuations are ripples across inherently existent gravity (gravity is always uncaused) that produce energy strong enough to concentrate into a gravitational singularity that begins to radiate energy as Hawking radiation. [1][2] I clearly stated that both the M-theory superstring model of eleven dimensions AND the normal four-dimension model of the universe state that the Big Bang cannot be caused by an external force. [3][4] The energy came from random and uncaused quantum fluctuations in the universe. For further reference, here is a diagram of the universe’s inflationary process: Therefore, there need not be a God to cause the Big Bang and most rational evidence suggests that there shouldn’t. The Omnipotence ParadoxRule 2 states that refuting logic is not accepted. In Pro’s rebuttal to the omnipotence paradox, Pro has assumed the existence of God. The statement “God must be omnipotent by definition” is incorrect. IF God exists, he is omnipotent. My point is, since omnipotence is impossible, God CANNOT be omnipotent by definition. Therefore, an omnipotent God’s existence is impossible. God either can or cannot. There is no philosophical “in-between”. For the purposes of this argument, ignore whether God exists or not and then address this paradox. I shall then respond to it. Omniscience ParadoxIf God has definite, certain knowledge, then everything is predestined and predetermined. Predetermined actions imply a lack of contingencies. If God knows everything, then even everything within the boundaries of spacetime is not contingent. But, within the boundaries of spacetime, disorder exists.*[5] According to the laws of Quantum Mechanic Wave Function, everything is determined by changes in the space-time continuum and all quantum waves differ. This difference is known as entropy. [4] Philosophically, only contradictions are definite and propositions are not.** [6][7][8] Cosmic QuestionIf God is, “by nature, eternal”, then why can’t gravity and energy be so? If a certain object has a property, there is always a possibility that another object has the same property.+ Thus, the Cosmic Question is still valid. ArgumentsMoral Authority How can a being have control over all moral authority? Morality is relative and a being acting as a supreme source of moral authority completely challenges the concept of probability. If everything is predetermined, then moral judgment and immorality do not exist. But a being as a source of moral authority challenges the concept of omniscience itself. Please substantiate. Notes *A slight inaccuracy – entropy is not disorder, entropy is a measure for disorder; the graduation of disorder. The rate of entropy in the universe is time (by the “monoverse” {i.e. single-universe} theory; the second law of thermodynamics does not apply to the new dual-universe theory, that states that time can move backwards and is defined by gravity, not entropy. **Russell, Bertrand (1872-1970); Russell’s Teapot analogy (see Reference 8) +Schrödinger, Erwin (1887-1961) Message I laud my opponents arguments and am eagerly awaiting his response. Thanks to @sengejuri for participating so well in this debate. References [1] http://www.space.com...[2] Hawking, S.; Mlodinow, Leonard. The Grand Design. Bantam Books, New York (2008). ISBN-0-553-80537-1.[3] Stephen Hawking: The Official Website (http://www.hawking.org.uk...)[4] Hawking, S. A Brief History of Time. Bantam Dell Publishing Group, New York. (1988) ISBN-978-0-553-10953-5.[5] Bailyn, M. (1994). A Survey of Thermodynamics, American Institute of Physics Press, New York, ISBN 0-88318-797-3, pp. 14–15, 214.[6] Bury, J. B. (1914). History of Freedom of Thought. London: Williams & Norgate. p. 20.[7] Ramsey, Frank (1960). Theories. The Foundation of Mathematics (Littlefield Adams). p. 235.[8] Russell, Bertrand. "Is There a God? [1952]" (PDF).The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 11: Last Philosophical Testament, 1943–68. Routledge. pp. 547–548. (http://russell.mcmaster.ca...)