Is it likely that God exists.

My standpoint Premise 1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause(Of its existence). Things cannot pop into existence utterly uncaused out of complete nothing. If they could, we should expect to see it all the time. (Note: before you say the quantum vacuum is nothing, it is not. That would be to mistake the definition of nothing. Nothing, properly defined, is NOT ANYTHING. no time, no space, no matter, NOTHING.) Premise 2: The universe began to exist. this premise is supported by the modern big bang model. Even if there were a multiverse, it would have to have a finite beginning according to the Borde-Guth Vilenkin theorem. To quote Alexander Vilenkin: "It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. With the proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape: they have to face the problem of a cosmic beginning." Conclusion: the universe has a cause. Properties of cause: I am quoting William Lane Craig, from the Blackwell companion to Natural Theology. 1.A first state of the material world cannot have a material explanation and must originate ex nihilo in being without material cause, because no natural explanation can be causally prior to the very existence of the natural world (space-time and its contents). It follows necessarily that the cause is outside of space and time (timeless, spaceless), immaterial, and enormously powerful, in bringing the entirety of material reality into existence. 2.Even if positing a plurality of causes prior to the origin of the universe, the causal chain must terminate in a cause which is absolutely first and uncaused, otherwise an infinite regress of causes would arise. (It is important to know the distinction between an Actual Infinity, and a Potential Infinite. A potential infinite is where infinity is merely an ideal limit, which is never reached. An actual infinity is a complete infinite set. ) 3.Occam's Razor maintains that unicity of the First Cause should be assumed unless there are specific reasons to believe that there is more than one causeless cause. 4.Agent causation, volitional action, is the only ontological condition in which an effect can arise in the absence of prior determining conditions. Therefore, only personal, free agency can account for the origin of a first temporal effect from a changeless cause. 5.Abstract objects, the only other ontological category known to have the properties of being uncaused, spaceless, timeless and immaterial, do not sit in causal relationships, nor can they exercise volitional causal power. Another reason it is FAR more plausible that God exists, is the extraordinary fine tuning exhibited in nature. If any of the fundamental constants and quantities of nature were to have been different even by the slightest bit, all interactive life would be utterly impossible. Here are a couple of examples: Ratio of Electrons:Protons1:10^37 Ratio of Electromagnetic Force:Gravity1:10^40 Expansion Rate of Universe1:10^55 Mass Density of Universe1:10^59 Cosmological Constant1:10^120 and the Big kicker, the Ratio of Mass to Energy in the early universe: 1:10^10^123 This fine tuning is due to either: Necessity,(These Constants HAVE to have these Values.) Chance(We got really, really, REALLY lucky) Or Design.