Trump is a better candidate than Clinton for President

Pro responds to my point about the mark of a good politician (telling people what they want to hear), but does not respond to my argument that all politicians lie, especially Donald Trump. I have proven that Donald Trump lies more than any other candidate including Hillary Clinton. If Pro's point is that a liar would be a bad POTUS, then he is saying Donald Trump would be a horrible president based on the fact that he lies so much, which Pro does not deny. Pro shows videos of Donald Trump talking about his campaign goals. We don't know that Donald can realistically implement his campaign goals. Many of them have been criticized as being Unconstitutional. http://reason.com... http://www.nationalreview.com... Even so, repeating his campaign goals does not prove that Donald Trump doesn't lie. Extend my arguments on lying and extend my arguments that Hillary knows how to work with the people and other politicians better by being persuasive instead of combative. Donald Trump himself admitted that Hillary would be a good president. http://time.com... Pro talks about Hillary Clinton accepting money for speeches given to bankers. That is not illegal or immoral. Donald Trump meanwhile has been called "the king of sleaze" for his business practices. http://townhall.com... Please extend my arguments from last round about other presidential scandals. Pro criticizes Hillary for being "soft" on terrorism just because she does not want to be quick to go to war. "It would be a serious mistake to stumble into another costly ground war in the Middle East," she said. "If we"ve learned anything from Iraq and Afghanistan, it"s that people and nations have to secure their own communities." http://www.nytimes.com... Compare this to Donald Trump who is a war monger and wants to get the U.S. involved in more conflicts overseas. This puts both the U.S. military and citizens in danger. Hillary Clinton does want to fight ISIS and all other terrorist groups that threaten our national security. She has been vocal about her anti-terrorist plans, and does not deny that RADICAL Islam is the culprit. You can read the full transcripts of her speech on ISIS here. http://time.com... But Hillary Clinton will not Unconstitutionally swear off all Muslims. She recognizes that not all Muslims are violent or extreme, and they do not deserve persecution as U.S. citizens especially. Donald Trump has anti anti-Muslim position that is not only Unconstitutional but also very immoral, hateful and xenophobic. Pro tries to argue that Islam is dangerous, so we should support Donald Trump's ideas. This violates people's right to equal protection under the law, as well as their first amendment religious freedom rights. https://www.washingtonpost.com... Islam is no more inherently violent than other religions. https://www.jihadwatch.org... The Old Testament of the Bible and the Torah are equally vicious as the Quran. What's important is not making religious text the law of the land, which Muslims in or entering America do not seek to do. Pro talks about how free speech and other things are not compatible with Islam, but that doesn't matter because we have a separation of church and state in this country. That's why banning Muslims is not justifiable. We have freedom of religion. Pro's comments are unsupported. "We also know Clinton will never face it no matter what the full truth is. That is a threat to the national security of the United States of America. She will do nothing to protect us from Islamic terrorism." We have no reason to believe this. Hillary Clinton has been a successful politician and that's why she has been re-elected to office so many times. As Secretary of State she is exposed to more information than Pro or anyone in the media. My opponent dropped my arguments on Hillary Clinton's experience making her a better candidate. In the last round I explained why Trump is unqualified to be president, which Pro did not respond to. Extend my argument that Trump is for expanding the military, which is very unnecessary waste of tax payer money. Donald Trump's foreign policy is dangerous. This might be because he has such bad and incompetent "advisers." The entire GOP is embarrassed by his choice of advisers because of how awful they are. http://www.politico.com... Trump has said that he would ask troops to break the law by murdering people. It's despicable that a president would order troops, who are supposed to be used for American protection, to impose arbitrary beliefs about immigrants and kill people who pose no immediate harm. He should be disqualified from the presidency for this. http://townhall.com... He also cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. He is very pro-violence and not diplomatic. He thinks looking for peaceful solutions is "weak" when it is often necessary and the best strategy to save money and especially lives. Extend my point that Donald Trump also wants to build a wall, which would be expensive, bad for trade and freedom. Hillary Clinton supports a woman's right to choose, the freedom of gay people to get married, and responsible gun ownership. Donald Trump has gone back on supporting a woman's personal choice and has become socially conservative. Despite the fact that he was a cheating husband with multiple failed marriages, he thinks gay people shouldn't have the opportunity to get married. He has flip flopped so many times, far more than Hillary and that's saying something. My opponent says we always know where Donald Trump stands. That is completely untrue. He's flip flopped on more than 10 important topics. http://www.cnn.com... Donald Trump has unrealistic economic proposals and his plans for trade would be awful. http://time.com... His economic plan has been called "utterly ridiculous" and impossible. https://www.washingtonpost.com... Donald makes things up and tells people (Republicans) what they want to hear, even if it is unjust, illegal or untrue. Trump is supported by some of the most evil and immoral dictators including Kim Jung Un and evil Vlad Putin. http://www.slate.com... Meanwhile Trump is not supported by the current and last 4 sitting presidents: Barack Obama, GWB, Bill Clinton, the older George Bush and Jimmy Carter. The last 5 presidents agree that Donald would be bad for the job, including Republican presidents. Hillary Clinton understands foreign policy. She is qualified and experienced. She will fight for the middle class and presents a balance of moderate politics. She is willing to listen to the people and reflect their wishes, which is what a politician is supposed to do.