Batman could beat Spiderman in a fight.

I will go over my opponents case, then I will go over my own. ***** OPPONENTS CASE *****1. MASTER OF DISGUISE "I doubt that. Batman has a full body suit, voice distortion device and an electric shock device on his mask, so that anybody who touches it would get a shock. So yeah, maybe a grilled 4th grader could figure it out. Also in public Bruce acts like a shameless douchebag just to throw everybody off the hook. "I am Not even talking shock devices physically touch Batman to know who he is. No one needs to Does no one find it convenient that his mouth and jaw are exactly similar to Bruce Wayne's? Spiderman has a full body suit, so any plausibility of him being Peter Parker is eliminated. "But that wasn't even what I meant. I meant actual disguises. Often when Batman has to retrieve information about gangs and their whereabouts, he disguises himself as a mobster. He has various alter-ego's like Matches Malone, Thomas Quigly, Detective Hawke, Lester Krutz and many more. ". http://batman.wikia.com...Actual criminal. This is a horrible disguise, because if someone knew that ACTUAL criminal and noticed the dis-similarities in Batman's facial features and his persona, Batman would be screwed. He is lucky in the series that the author gives the snow white effect, and this doesn't happen due to some retarded criminals. If this is the argument for him being a master in disguise, and this is all batman has going for him, then he is up against a big challenge in spiderman.2. BATMAN'S GOT DIRT ON EVERYONE"Gotham city is very similar to New York with its tall buildings, so Batman is familiar as well. About the gliding, you're partially right, though Batman does have a pneumatic system in his boots giving him somewhat of a jet pack (not entirely though, but he can build up quite some speed). "So now your admitting to batman's fallacies in maneuverability. We simply must presume that when is comes to agility, and ability to move away from attacks quickly, that Spiderman will take the cake. This also allows "You're also forgetting Batman is a master tactician. Of course he knows he's in disadvantage if he went straight to him. There are many villains of his who are better in combat than Batman (like mr. Freeze), but he has defeated him despite. " Ah, so you are also admitting to Spiderman being better than Batman! To say that batman could spiderman in a fight then based on solely purposes of preparation, is then to use a semantics argument. Even after all this, the argument falls. Batman can research the crap outta spiderman all he wants, but at the end of the day, he will always physically lack the strength and abilities that Spiderman Possesses.3. BATMAN'S GOT INSANE STACKS"First off, in reference to spidermans web shooters. Spiderman only has web shooters in the cartoon series. In the comic book and in the first movie, spiderman can shoot web purely out of his palms, without the use of any mechanic device. Thus, we do not recognize that spiderman can be blocked from shooting webs. However I still contest that money should have nothing to do with the fight they have. Spider man in a city setting should be easily able to escape any gas that may be able to deter his spidey senses. Even without spider senses, batman's strength is far inferior to that of spidermans. Batman is only human. Spiderman is a mutant. It all comes down to whether or not Batman can take a punch. "Each argument made thus far has been an admittal to defeat. I agree with this argument in it's entirety. I am sure Batman can take a punch, but what about 2 or 3 or 4? How many can Batman take before he is defeated? If spiderman is really that much stronger, that much faster, and that much all round superior, then what chance does batman really have against Spiderman? Bat man being able to take a punch is not an argument that supports him winning a fight against Spiderman. The argument you were trying to make here is now deterred, as well. I ask the question, if batman can afford vast quantities of items, how are they going to help him? Now that you agree that spiderman is superior, we can assume that Spiderman can dodge anything on Batman's cute little utility belt. 4. BATMAN IS A PREDATOR"No, with predator I didn't mean someone who can escape. With predator I mean making good use of your training as a ninja and waiting in the dark until your prey is distracted, then grab him when he doesn't notice. "You see, with Batman's many weaknesses, he has to rely on staying hidden. Spiderman is powerful enough, to where he can confront his enemies Full Force, and still take out the crooks! But even spiderman has tactics. He has sneaked up on his foes before as well, often gently webbing down above the enemy, to drop down as a surprise attack. . http://marvel.wikia.com...(Peter_Parker)5. BATMAN CAN BEAT ANYONE "Yes Bane broke his back, but he still recovered, didn't he? Azrael took his place in that time but Batman subdued him because he was too violent. "So then Batman was beaten. If he can be beaten, then he cannot be anyone, and this point falls. ***** MY CASE *****C1: Batman relies on his equipment "That is like saying without Spidey's spider powers, he couldn't win either. Batman has them, so he makes use of them. Also if you took away his equipment, he would still be a multi-millionaire, ninja, master tactician, master of disguise, master of interrogation and police techniques and combatant. Also one of his biggest powers is his great will power, with that he can achieve about everything he sets his mind to. " That's not the point I was trying to make however. Think about it this way. Batman Can lose his equipment. What then? Spiderman cannot just lose his powers. .. They are part of him. Batman may be an intelligent individual, but this will not help him if Spiderman can get his equipment away from him. He is basically now Spiderman's victim, and is subject to whatever Spiderman wants to due to him. C2: Spiderman's web puts Batman at a disadvantage "Yes, it's his ultimate if not only weapon. That means if Batman found a way to destroy it, Spidey would lose. I've already told various ways to destroy that web of his. That's the difference between Spidey and Batman. Spiderman keeps clinging to his superpowers, making him predictable, while Batman keeps improving his tactics and adjusting them to his enemy, making him unpredictable and hard to beat. "In order for this argument to work, you must present a way for Batman to accomplish this, which is virtually impossible, as these abilities are naturally a part of Spiderman. Batman's equipment is not, as said above. Also predictability won't matter if Batman cannot defeat Spiderman. This is the only thing Batman has in his arsenal, but even you said Spider man is Superior. All he has to is wrap batman up in a shroud of web to impair batman to the point where he cannot use his weapons. C3: Moral choice"This is what you understand under "defeating". Kill? No. KO? Likely. You said yourself Batman has been beaten numerous times, but never really killed (unless you count the trips to the Lazarus pit). But there are ways to subduing Spiderman and letting him live. Spiderman has killed several times, which he mostly did out of anger. This shows Batman is mentally more stable than Spiderman. So if we talk about killing, then it would be an infinite fight since they would never kill each other. But if we're talking about KO'ing, then there's no problem. "How can you say one is truly beaten, if they can always come back for more of a fight? The enemies that Spiderman has killed (whether out of anger or not) are still dead, and can never return to battle Spiderman, thus they are truly defeated. If Spiderman can do this to Batman, then Batman will be defeated. Batman cannot, and will not kill any one for any reason, so no matter what Spiderman is free to defeat Batman at will.