Does Ohrmazd exist

I shall now tear my opponent's argument apart. I shall address all points, quote by quote and rationally conclude them to either be false, irrelevant or in favour of pro."This argument for Ohrmazd is very simple." Irrelevant." It is ridiculous to deny " if anything begins to exist, then it has a cause of its existence "." This is completely false. A cause is a rationally interpretable reason behind something occurring. It is thus equally irrational to think that God existed without a cause, and hence creator, just as much as it is to think the universe did. This argument fails by the very fact that Ohrmazd, God, is an entity of existence without a cause or creator at all. It just is and eternally has been and will be, why then is it any more irrational to conclude that the universe (or multiverse) in which we exist is of the same nature of origin?"The Western thinker David Hume, argued that since we can imagine it, it must be possible. But this is fallacious, because our imagination doesn't determine reality." How do you know that you aren't imagining everything that is real right now? How do you know you are not dreaming? How do you know you are not in the Matrix (an alternate false reality)? You don't. There is nothing one can label 'real' that one cannot label 'imaginable by the individual that thinks it to be real. After all, You imagine god to be real without a single piece of evidence whatsoever other than scripture revealing another's imagination finding a similar God under the same alias "Ohrmazd"."I can imagine any number of things that are impossible." I am afraid that you can't. This is a false claim."This premise seems true both from our experience and from our intuition from how the world works!" Absolutely unwarranted and false."If " the Universe at some finite time in the past began to exist " is true, and " if anything begins to exist, then it has a cause of its existence " is true, then we must agree that the Universe has a cause. We also are right in thinking this is God, or Ohrmazd, for only a willful being could create a Universe with a finite past." However, by definition, Ohrmazd, God, is an entity that exists and yet has no creator or cause itself and has existed eternally and will exist eternally. Thus your own premise to disprove atheism disproves Ohrmazd in and of itself."We all know that morals exist." Unwarranted and irrelevant."We know that the Nazi's who created the Holocaust that killed the Jews were wrong." No we don't."we know that the Christian's who begin charities and feed people do morally good things." Many have been caught committing pedophilic rape (http://rense.com...) So I really think this claim is false."So we have established that morality does exist." Firstly we haven't, secondly this doesn't warrant Ohrmazd's existence in any way whatsoever."If an Aztec person thinks that feeding the hungry is morally wrong, would that change your mind on the moral goodness of feeding the hungry?" If the Aztec scriptures were the source of my morality then yes it actually would."Any reasonable person would not accept all culture's morality over their own." This is exactly the mentality of the Nazis, Al Qaeda, Taliban and The Americans who dropped the bomb of Hiroshima on Japan. I do not consider these people reasonable and hence claim this false."So we know that morality is independent of whatever place you live in" Irrelevant and unwarranted as many devout patriots and jingoists see the law of their lands to be code of morality by which to go by."morality exists in the heart" No, it exists as a non-physical idea independent of the heart, originating in mind and reasoning."morality exists in the heart, and is there when our conscience tells us something is right or wrong." Irrelevant." think upon virtue and do not turn your thoughts to sin." One cannot control their thoughts, this would mean a free will controlling the free will."Our very intuition and conscience, with all individuals, would agree that morals exist." I do not think that Stalin would agree with you."But how do morals exist?" They don't."If we are the result of a mindless universe, then there is no axiomatic moral value that could come out of it in the way we see." Yes and axiomatic morals do not exist."It makes sense to ascribe moral values to God, or Ohrmazd, who declares to us to live our lives in a good way." If morality is inherently present in ourselves it makes no sense at all to ascribe them to Ohrmazd."So Ohrmazd is the best explanation for morals." False and unwarranted."Well, we know that Ohrmazd exists because of the Universe and because of morals." We includes you and I at the very least. Since I do not know this, this statement is false."So even if one of the two arguments is false, the other would still lead to the conclusion that Ohrmazd exists." Unless both are false. This is the case.