That there is no such thing as a bad question

To make rebuttals easier, I have listed my arguments in order here. My thanks to my opponent if he/she would do the same thing. :) 1) 'Bad' is a set definition that can describe a question 2) Malicious Questions are bad questions 3) It is possible to waste questions and therefore have bad questions 4) Bad quality questions are bad questions To start, we need a universal definition that the pro side agree with, concerning the word 'bad.' If my opponent disagrees with the definition, I would request him/her to state an alternate definition. bad: not good; not as it should be; inadequate or unfit; rotten or spoiled; incorrect or faulty; wicked; immoral; malicious or of malicious intent; harmful; ill; in sorry state, distressed. (Webster's English Dictionary) From that definition, I would like to highlight the words Malicious and harmful. My First argument is that questions can fit this definition of Malicious/harmful. It is completely possible, easy even, to cause intentional harm via a question. For example, in a debate, a morally dubious propaganda technique is an attack of the person. I argue from the assumption that my opponent is familiar with the rather self-explanatory term. An attack of the person is from pure and simple malice. What is to be noted however, is that an attack of person can be done using questions alone. Consider this exchange where person A attacks person B's integrity using questions. Person A: [argues correctly] Person B: "are you high on drugs? Is that what is making you sound like that?" Person B has illegitimately accused Person A of something that both of them know not to be true. However, the observer is ignorant and Person B asked the question to undermine Person A's integrity, note, Maliciously. So Person B asked the question with the intention to cause harm, or otherwise, maliciously. In this scenario, Malicious means bad. Therefore, Person B asked a very bad question. My third argument is that it is possible to waste a question. Again, for the purpose of this debate, I will have to define 'waste.' Verb: Use or expend carelessly, extravagantly, or to no purpose. A close synonym to the word waste is 'squander.' And in this example, Person B squanders a question. Person A: [gives information] Person B: [has choice of 2 questions he/she can make, what? or how? Person B can only ask one question and chooses to ask what? In the full knowledge that asking why? would be of greater benefit]. Person B here completely ignored the opportunity to ask a valid question, instead choosing to ask the inferior of which he already knew the answer. It is undeniable to say that person B, asked the bad question out of the possible two. That argument ties in neatly with my fourth and final point. That a poor quality question is a bad question, not necessarily a bad questioner. It stands to reason that a person bad at asking questions will ask bad question. These bad questions are questions that do not serve the purpose of questions, namely, they do not warrant a valid answer. In other words, If I were to ask someone if I had brilliant blue rainbows and ponies jumping out of my mouth, I would be asking a question whose answer I was already aware of. This makes the question completely redundant, or in other words, bad. Concluding, Bad questions are questions that are intentionally harmful/malicious, deliberately wasteful, and completely useless. If a question can be found to be useless, malicious, or wasteful, then we can agree that the question being asked is a bad question.