Should Abortion be Illegal

Your first argument is incorrect for one reason only: you cannot decide what type of debate abortion is because it can be and has been examined from multiple angles. I provided scientific evidence for why abortion is murder in the last round which can be used to support this point. Also, the source you use for your first argument in the previous round was posted by someone with no credentials whatsoever. Your second argument has no evidence to support it. However, I do feel the need to delve into this side of the debate more. You claim that the fetus is not a person, but you provide no definition for what a "person" is. I do in the previous round and a person in the context of this debate is a being that has human genetic coding. Since fetuses have this coding hours after conception as provided in my evidence, it IS a human being. Since you have chosen not to provide evidence to most of your claims, and since you insist on debating from a moral standpoint, I will too. But know that my evidence from the first round will be extended. Your third claim is that some children will be born with defects and complications. This is true, but because you have chosen to use this as a reason to support abortion, you have already lost the debate. Allow me to explain 1) you say that this should be a moral debate, and I have agreed to debate it from a moral perspective from this round onward (with my evidence from round 2 being completely valid). 2)because this debate is now based upon morality, the debater with the most convincing moral perspective will win 3) I win already. You are saying that it wouldn't be fair if a child is born in pain. But if you justicy abortion using this claim you are also saying that mentally and physically ill children do not have the right to life because of their circumstances. This is morally wrong. Parents of children with down-syndrome, paralysis, and many other afflictions do find it hard to see their child go through pain. But they don't abort their children for it! Your essentially saying that if a child is going to be born deaf, and his mother does not want to watch him grow up without being able to hear music or laughter because it would cause her pain, that she has a right to abort that child. Finally, you say there are social reasons to get abortions. This is absolutely absurd as an argument. We cannot justify murder because a parent is ashamed that their daughter got pregnant. This encourages the perpetuation of social pressures and bigoted standards society holds women to. To say that because a parent is "disgraced" that their daughter is pregnant makes me wonder what you wiould do if you were faced with the same situation. It is morally wrong to make a women go through a dangerous and potentially harmful procedure because we are socially inconvienenced. I would like to extend my argument that abortion is sexist and promotes the mistreatment of women. I would also like to extend my arguments that prove abortions are harmful to women.. I apologize for any grammatical errors. I am typing on a very small phone screen! Finally, before we continue, I would like to point out that even though I am trying to speak in a very formal way and have a very structured debate, I truly believe that abortion is morally wrong. I have taken into account the effects it has on women, and as a women myself have tried to imagine what it would be like when faced with that choice. But I promote life in every instance I can, and I believe it is everybody's responsibility to do the same.