God exists and is a real being

Thanks Pro. "Folks this is the madness that is atheism. I hope all can see. He first argument has to do with possible ideals of a universe with no being. But think bout it. First explaning the universe doesn't disprove God. Let look at his first ideal" I already conceded that it didn't "disprove" god. "The set of what is simultaneiously caused must needs be caused. You only explain three things on their own but the set would need to be caused. How did this act of causation come to be with no God? Sure yeah maybe three things on their own taking nuttin else can be explained but looking out from a holistic view all parts it is saying it came from nowhere" So he concedes that the universe could have come without god... How it came to be earth at that point beats me. "NO offense, but look at the madness. Come on, the universe wouldn't exist to bring itself into being. It would have to of already existed.....Dudestop and look at it" No evidence given to suggest it's wrong... I hope Pro is still going to debate me. R "Who created this multiverse? Cant be infinite because than it would take an infinite amount of time to get to "now". Must be finite" Simultaneous causation and retro causality. Not a "who"... "Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is not like faith, or love, that exist just as does light and heat. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light." "You see God will make the evil count for the greater good. Like the bible says it will. Only a temp suffering but for longer term goodness. This brings me to my argument bc evil proves God" A greater good for who? The tortured victims? The raped children? The millions if not more of sick and or dying children around the world? You don't think god could think of a better way to achieve this "Greater good"? This is clearly a contradiction. Con uses evil to attempt to prove god, yet he claims it does not exist. I already suggested evil should be defined as pain and suffering, which occurs regardless of "Gods Love". God is also supposedly omnipresent, meaning he is everywhere... "By self reflection you can come to the conclusion not only does God exist but hes a real being. We know evil is real. My opponent said so. We do bad things. Yes its true there is not one that does good. we have all had evil moments and thought bad thoughts stole something lied ect. Its human nature. But it only takes one lie to make you a lair. We would all be highly immoral the soceity would be an evil ruthless society without some counter balance. The counterbalance cant come from the world because this world is corrupted. It must come from a highly moral world from a moral being into this world. There must have been a perfect man to do away with our evils. This man cant have been all man because man is corrupt. It must be a man not of this universe that is perfectly moral. This being is clearly God. Not only God, but Jesus." Yet again, I point out the contradiction from his last refutation. If Pro could clarify whether it exists or not, that'd be great. "Consider mind. Its a tough subject. We exist. Because we think. Our minds must exist. Alvin Plantenga said if whats true for my mind is true for my body then we should be able to doubt the mind. We can dobut the body but not the mind. The mind is not of the body but the mind began. From an atheistic perective its impossible. How did the mind itself begin and become correlated with the body? God must have been in play" Dobut? I don't know how it came to be, but saying that it is proof of god is an argument of ignorance. [1] Why not assume fine tuning is the evidence for a multiverse instead of evidence of a God? Also notice he didn't out a shred of evidence to support this. So you see, my opponent conceded to almost all of my points about god, and when he actually made some points he contradicted himself and/or made logical fallacies. Please, I urge you to vote Con. Thank You. [1] http://www.logicalfallacies.info...