Is is probable that the Christian God does not exist.

I'll jump right into my arguments. A Numerical ApproachLet us create a set of gods that could possible exist. G = [None, Christian God, Allah, Ra, Hermes, . .. , unknown god a, unknown god b, . .. ]This set is clearly infinite. If we were to create subsets of G with similar characteristics, we might come to three subsets. The first is finite and contains only "None". This is the subset that represents a state in which a god does not exist. The second would also be finite and would consist of all the gods that history has every mentioned. We might call these "named gods". The last subset would be infinite, and would contain all possible gods that could exist, but that have not been named. Understanding this, we might assume that every element of G is equally as likely to be true as all the others. If we do assume this, we can calculate the probability of the Christian God existing by placing the likelihood that a Christian God exists over the combined likelihoods of each other possible god. This essentially leaves us with the probability of the Christian God existing at1/infinity -- which is zero for all intents and purposes. Changing WeightsThe previous argument would be acceptable for a hypothetical universe, one that we know little about. However, we do have the privilege of living in an actual universe, so we can make observations in an attempt to change the probabilistic weights of our set G. Starting with the subset of all unknown gods, we really can't change these weights at all. They will all be equal in weight since there is no information we can gain about them through observation. The remaining subsets will gain additional weight, based upon the physical evidence that each case is true. I will be arguing that a) the subset [None] has a substantial amount of weight and b) that the Christian God element does not have enough weight to be considered to have a probability above 50%. Arguments For [None]Religious Texts: Most all we known about known gods comes from religious texts that have been created throughout the centuries. There has yet to be a verifiable instance in which a god took physical form and made clear his existence, so we are left with texts. Many of these texts claim their relevant god interacts with the world. Some gods, like the Roman/Greek gods, interact more with this world than others. What we can do, then, is look at how much a given god is supposed to interact with the world and compare it to how much they actually seem to have interacted with the world. If there is a significant disparity between the two, it decreases the likelihood that the god in question exists. Since we are talking about the Christian god, I will only analyze the Bible and its claims regarding God's interactions with the world. The events we will be considering: the creation of the world, the creation of man, and the Great Flood. These events were some of the most important that God supposedly orchestrated. The Creation of the World: The scientific theory on how the Earth formed over 4.5 billion years ago is one rarely disputed. An immense amount of work put in by many different fields of science has greatly increased our understanding of how our world was formed and how worlds are formed in general. Basically, as stars form, dense clumps of matter can be thrown off into the forming star's orbit. These dense clumps accumulate solid matter over time, eventually forming a planet. This is inconsistent with the Biblical creation of the Earth. The Bible clearly states that the Earth was created by God directly, not through other astrological events. Additionally, it states that the Earth existed before light did. This is counter to our understanding of planetary formation, which necessitates that a star exist prior to the planet's being formed. The Creation of Man: The Bible claims that God created man. This runs counter to evolutionary theory, for which there is a great wealth of evidence. It is understood that man did not always have this form, but that we evolved from ape-like creatures. This is vastly different than the Bible's claim that man was directly created, in his current form, by God. The Great Flood: The Bible claims that God, at one point, flooded the entire earth with water for a period exceeding 40 days. Such a flood would leave physical evidence in the surface of the earth, and slightly beneath it in various beds of rocks and sediment. The science is fairly complicated and can be found here: [. http://ncse.com...]There is physical evidence that the flood did not occur, meaning that God did not act upon the earth as the Bible claimed. Remembering my previous statement that a god is less likely to exist if his religious texts claims he interacted with the world when it can be proved he did not, it is clear that this brief analysis demonstrates that the Christian God has a diminished probability. In fact, if we look at the world we see that we understand why most things happen. There remain fewer and fewer physical events that cannot be explained by science. This is relevant because it reduces the likelihood of most known gods existing, since most of these claim to have dramatically interacted with the world. Analyzing Current Probability WeightsNow that we've looked at the physical evidence in our universe, we are able to modify our probability weights and again look at the resolution. We have concluded that the weights of our unknown gods have not changed (assuming they do not interact with the world), since we have no information about them. We've seen that all known gods fall in probability, due to my previous argument regarding religious texts' claims and contrary physical evidence. We additionally know that the likelihood of [None] being the case increases, since the set G must add to '1' and we have seen reduced likelihoods in our 'known god' subset. Given this, it is likely that a known god does not exist, especially the Christian God (which we analyzed in more depth). We are left with two likelihoods: that no god exists or that an unknown, non interacting God exists. In this case, we simply apply Occam's Razor and we are left with the conclusion that there most likely is not a God. I look forward to my opponent's response.