Science provides excellent evidence for the existence of God

Definition of "GOD" [1] God : the supreme or ultimate reality: as a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe b : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Well your first argument is clearly flawed.The premise of you arqument is baced on a mere theory and hypothesis that has not yet been proven throughowly enough. 1 First Argument In you first argument you bacically say, nothing can come into existence without there being something therefore, the universe is most likely caused and created by a supreme ruler( GOD ).Even if this is accepted( Which is not due to Quantum Fluctuacions [2] ) this isn't an argument for a creator (God) existing. I would also point out that this argument doesn't argue that the universe must have a cause, but rather a more modest claim that the universe is most likely caused. And obviously it doesn't argue that God is necessary for the universe to exist.2. Second Argument.Sadly but reasonably I disagree with your assesment."...odds of the Universe existing in a way that allows for life are so small as to be non-existent unless it was intentionally designed by an intelligent being.""... was slightly different, no life of any type could exist. If gravity were too weak for instance, stars would not form. If too strong, the universe would have collapsed quickly"Here you say that the chances of life are so minute that it is imposible for us to be here.Yet science proves that it is still posible for us to be here without gods help. Yes, albeit life might be hard to come into existence this does not mean it is imposible. You completly rule out any chances of life beacause of chance/coincidence by basically saying that slightly tweeking with gravity would create NO life whatsoever, and this argument is fallacious. It is erroneous because basically increasing the gravity of our solar system ( increasing the mass of the sun considerably) or reducing it ( decresing the ammount of mass the sun posses considerably) will just cause planets to move close to the sun, or farther away respectivly. This ajustment of length from the sun( slightly tweeking with gravity) would not mean that life would NO be able to exist. This would just mean that the planets within the habitable zone or as I enjoy calling it, the Goldilock area.[This Goldilocks area, is an area in the space that is suitable for life to flourish] will be the ones to produce life."My second argument is that the odds of the Universe existing in a way that allows for life are so small as to be non-existent unless it was intentionally designed by an intelligent being." Acctually if you think about the chances of life in the universe are relativly good. Out of the BILLIONS of stars in the universe plenty will be in a safe galaxy away from black holes and other celestial" life destroyers". Then we need one to contain all the right elements and substances needed for micorbes and bacteria to exist. And finally the planet needs to be in the goldilock area so that an atmosphere can form and so that the intense heat from the local star won't kill off all life and so extreme sub-zero temperatues won't freeze water and life itself. 3."Using the argument for the beginning of the Universe and the fine tuning of the Universe, it seems like we have two real options; either something or someone created the Universe, or an infinite number of unobservable, untestable universes popped into existence from nothing for no reason at a finite point in the past. Frankly, the second "scientific" reason seems like a far greater stretch than the first."In this part of your argument do you really believe that astronolical coinsidence and chance are less likely than GOD ?!?!?I find this to be highly unreasonable and illogical. Are you suggesting that a .... [3] Being that has never left any physical evidence of his existence on earth Being that has never spoken to modern man, for example by taking over all the television stations and broadcasting a rational message to everyone. Being that "created" religious scriptures are probavly incorrect and is obviously the work of primitive men rather than God. Being who "listens" to prayers and then when we analyze prayer with statistics, we find no evidence that God is "answering prayers." Being who let huge, amazing atrocities like the Holocaust and AIDS occur without any response from God. And so on…is more likely to be true than some astronomical "luck" and chance ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------My argument 1. Ordered complexity requires an explanation."Ordered complexity" means a system composed of several parts that are arranged in such a way as to produce some specific function that is otherwise improbable. An example is your TV: There are many parts which are arranged in such a way as to produce a specific function, and that function is highly unlikely to occur from a random arrangement of parts. Such complexity is very improbable unless it was brought about by something such as an intelligent designer or evolution by natural selection, and so we say these things require explanation.2. God is a being of ordered complexity.A being that is conscious (as a personal being is by definition) and can create must be very complex because consciousness and creativity only come about through a series of very specific mental steps. This will become a little more clear with the following quote:"To see that consciousness itself is complex, consider that consciousness requires the ability to store and access information that is linked together in many intricate ways as well as the ability to process that information and to reason. The web of intricately interconnected data that consciousness requires is extremely complex. One measure of the complexity of a system is the logarithm of the number of states of the system. Applied to a conscious system, this measure of complexity is proportional to the number of pieces of data that the conscious system knows times the degree of interconnectedness in the data." There are three interesting things to note here: 1) this measure of complexity is very large if a large amount ofdata is accessible; 2) the interconnectedness of data that consciousnessrequires greatly increases the complexity; and 3) for an omniscientbeing, this measure of the being's complexity diverges."Sources: http://freethought.freeservers.com......3. Therefore, God requires an explanation.4. But God does not and could not have an explanation(such as being the result of an evolutionary process orthe work of a higher designer).5. Therefore, God (probably) does not exist.Excuse me if there are grammar error and some weird stuff I have loads of work to do and I need to go to sleep :)Thank you for understanding ![1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...;[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...[3]http://godisimaginary.com...