The Deuterocanon is not inspired

Thanks to AlwaysmorethanYou for his last round. I will dropped the addition or subtraction of books and focus on thier errors. My opponent seemed to think the passages I supplied were not hinting to the Jewish disciples or prophets as being given the task of the correct canon and teachings. In 1 Thess. 2:4 it says, "But as we were allowed of God to be put in trust with the gospel." In Heb. 5:12, "Ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God." Acts 7:38, "This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spoke to him .....and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give to us." Romans 3:1-2, "What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that to them were committed the oracles of God." Who was to teach the scriptures? In John 7:35 it say's, "Then said the Jews among themselves....will he go to the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles?" We should not overlook that the Jews are God's chosen people and to them are given the inspiration of God. God did not name the Jews first as His people and then the Gentile for no reason at all. I have offered the examples of required inspration in other rounds and here. The RCC is in fact a Gentile church and are not given the oracles of God, only the Jews. The Eastern Orthodox is a whole different matter because they have yet another opinion about the canon. The Council of Jamnia, which seems to have taken place around 90 AD established the canon authoritatively for nearly all Jews. There were Jews living in Ethiopia who use a different canon than anyone else. This would lead into a whole round of discussion. As cited above and previous rounds the Jewish canon was pretty universal for all Jews. My opponent concludes that Jews could become atheist and should they be trusted then? Well, this is simply not the case and we are not debating hypotheticals. http://en.wikipedia.org... Certainly the Council of Jamnia had no Christians on it but why would that be of importance for the O.T.? Would not the non-Christian Jews want a correct O.T.? This does not change the fact that the N.T. gospels and writings came from Christian Jews. The problem is not the foundation of the RCC but the development of it afterwards. There were underground churches that existed before legalization of the RCC as the mother church, some are recorded to have existed in Europe, Greece, Pergamon, Anatolia, Derinkuyu and many other monastries. http://en.wikipedia.org... The Talmud is not part of canon scripture by the Jews and I have no problem with it quoting the book of Sirach. http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com... I never claimed that the N.T. was formed before 150 A.D. I claim that the O.T. canon was by the Jews in 90 A.D. and before the RCC canon. I got my O.T. from Jewish sources and my N.T. from universally agreed Christian canons. Roman Christians were not the only ones involved in the N.T. canon. We not debating the N.T. here, in that case, we agree on the N.T. canon. The only Jewish sect that maintains the books in the Deuterocanon are the Ethiopian Jews and we have discussed them briefly, they have the widest canon in the world. The reason I did not include Ethopian Jews because they were affiliated more closely with non-Jewish origin and mostly affiliated with other East Africans. http://en.wikipedia.org... The story of the Septuagint is that Ptolemy II sponsored the translation by non-Hebrew speaking Jews. They translated all the Jewish writings available before the canon. Starting approximately in the 2nd century CE, several factors led most Jews to abandon use of the Septuagint. The earliest gentile Christians of necessity used the it, as it was at the time the only Greek version of the Bible, and most, if not all, of these could not read Hebrew. http://en.wikipedia.org... The Bible mentions that the seven spirits are before God's throne, that Jesus Christ "holds" the seven spirits of God, they are seven burning lamps, the seven spirits have the "seven eyes" of the Lamb and states that they are "sent out into all the earth." The seven spirits of God are symbolic of the Holy Spirit. The Bible uses the number 7 to refer to perfection and completion. The perfect and complete Holy Spirit. Resource: The Holy Spirit by Charles Ryrie. Maccabees makes reference that there was no prophets of God to write inspired materials. Remember here that the author includes himself in this period. The author concedes that it is an abridgement of another man"s works and expresses concern as to whether a good job was done or not (see 2 Maccabees 2:23; 15:38). Till there should come a prophet. (1 Maccabees 4:46) There was no prophet seen in Israel. (1 Maccabees 9:27) There should arise a faithful prophet. (1 Maccabees 14:41) My opponent suggested that Saint Peter or Simon Peter was not a prophet. He was an early Christian leader and one of the twelve apostles of Jesus. James, son of Zebedee was one of the Twelve Apostles of Jesus. Peter himself agreed with the writings of Paul. The resurrected Jesus appeared to him, he was struck blind, and after his sight was restored Paul began to preach that Jesus was the Messiah. These three were hand picked by Jesus. Matthew 6:19-20(Proverbs 23:1-11) Matthew 7:16(Psalms 92:12-14) Matthew 27:43(Psalms 22:4-8) John 1:1-3(Psalms 119:159-160) There are examples of women receiving back their dead by resurrection in the Protestant O.T. Elijah raising the son of the widow of Zarepheth in 1 Kings 17, and you can find his successor Elisha raising the son of the Shunammite woman in 2 Kings 4. So the first part of Hebrews 11:35, is unquestionably referring to Scripture. Let's move on to the obvious contradictions and/or UnBiblical doctrines. 1. Judith 1:5 "Now in the twelfth year of his reign, Nabuchodonosor king of the Assyrians, who reigned in Ninive the great city, fought against Arphaxad and overcame him" Nebuchudnezzar was king of Babylon. 2. Tobit contains certain historical and geographical errors such as the assumption that Sennacherib was the son of Shalmaneser (1:15) instead of Sargon II, and that Nineveh was captured by Nebuchadnezzar and Ahasuerus (14:5) instead of by Nabopolassar and Cyaxares. 3. Doctrine of the Mass (2 Maccabees 12:42-45; compare with Hebrews 7:27). 4. The notion that the world was created out of preexistent matter (Wisdom of Solomon; compare with Genesis 1 and Psalm 33:9). 5. Giving alms and other works can make an atonement for sin (Ecclesiasticus [Sirach] 3:3; 3:30; 5:5; 20:28; 35:1-4; 45:16; 45:23; compare with Romans 3:20). 6. The invocation and intercession of the saints (2 Maccabees 15:14; Baruch 3:4; compare with Matthew 6:9). 7. Worship of angels (Tobit 12:12; compare with Colossians 2:18). 8. Purgatory and the redemption of souls after death (2 Maccabees 12:42,45; compare with Hebrews 9:27). The reason I dropped the adding or removing of books is because my opponent and the RCC could be right. I can admit that. What I have shown is the unability of the RCC to have authority in making canon scripture because they are not Jewish. I have shown that the Jews themselves (except the supposed Ethiopians) have rejected the Deuterocanon. I have given numerous contradictions and Biblical errors within the Deuterocanon. I also made a mistake writing that some of the books of the Deuterocanon were not written in Hebrew. I have made numerous errors in this debate and I apologize but these errors do not reflect the resolution of the proof why it should not be added in the canon. Resolution is affirmed!