Quantum Physics is False

1) QP is itself Contradictory? "He say just because quantum physics contradicts itself doesn't mean its wrong! Con clearly doesn't know what a contradiction is"Thats not even close to what I said. .. . What I said was just because two different sets of people INTERPRET Quantum Physics differently, it doesnt mean it by default IS contradictory. .. . It just means that one side is wrong in their interpretation. .. .. This argument was about how some people interpret Quantum physics to opposite sides. Pro forfeits the argument. .. .2) QP contradicts reality"You say QP is on math but it cant just be on paper it must be in the real world. "When I speak words. .. . Do you hear only dolphin sounds in your head or something? This argument was that some particles exhibit both particle-LIKE movement and Wave-LIKE movement at the same time. .. . "It cant have both! They're both contradictory! "They can and they do:. http://physics.about.com...When you shine a light through a hole, the light goes straight past it in a straight line and exhibits particle like movement. But when the width of the hole is just small enough, light actually bends around the corners and begins to behave like it has wave properties. .. .. . Basically they both can exist at the same time because we have observed that they both can exist at the same time. .. . Unless you deny the existence of light Pro. .. .3) Uncertainty Principle"Look if you know where a particle is you must know where its going because where a particle is can direct you to how fast! It doesn't matter how small! "And thats what every other idiot in the history of idiots who thought they knew what they were talking about has thought too, but individual particles dont behave like large objects that we are accustomed to measuring the speed and position of simultaneously. Particles move in a very erratic way (meaning not in a straight line) and unbelievably fast as well, so we can only know a limited amount about their speed and their location. But we cannot know a good amount about both of them at the same time. 4) Imaginary time"SH acts like imaginary time exists and so does physicists. Same with imaginary numbers"They dont say it exists idiot, they just use it to accurately explain how the universe works because occasionally, time the way we interpret it as doesnt give us enough information or data, whereas imaginary time does, and has given us conclusions about the way the Universe works that doesnt contradict what more realistic concepts tell us would happen. "He assumed that if they were involved, you couldn"t solve the problem"Sadly he was wrong, because he, like pro, is ASSUMING EVERYTHING"Issac Newton agreed with Descartes, and Albert Girad even went as far as to call these, "solutions impossible" " But 100 years later they were proven wrong because again, they were only assuming. .. .. . http://www.ualberta.ca... "I understand physics more than most on ddo. I've made physics majors cry! "You making physics majors cry is the one claim in your entire argument that is most likely to be true. .. But im sure everyone who has ever read one of your 'debates' can agree that you make physics majors cry because of your stupidity. .. .5) Subatomic particles"There is no evidence they exist! "But there kinda is. .. . And theres a lot of it too. .. .. . http://science.howstuffworks.com...http://education.jlab.org...http://library.thinkquest.org...http://dsc.discovery.com...http://www.scienceclarified.com...http://io9.com...http://www.nsta.org...http://www.pitt.edu...http://education.jlab.org...http://web.eecs.umich.edu...http://gk12.rice.edu...http://www.physicscentral.com...http://www.chemistryconnections.com...http://scienceforkids.kidipede.com...http://scienceforkids.kidipede.com...http://askascientist.co.uk...http://howdoweknow.org...http://www.colorado.edu...http://www.oocities.org...When