The Holy Spirit is real

Rebuttal=Definitions & IntroductionWe read speculation, assumptions, and guesswork. Nothing was presented that was objective, only subjective.CHRISTIANS PROVE THE HOLY SPIRIT IS REALThe only thing Christians have proved is that they believe in something they cannot physical demonstrate to us that it exist. Proof is based on objectivity of physical evidence. I can prove to you a sun lights our skies by taking you outside and pointing up at it. I can prove to you fire burns and the thing we call burn induces pain by lighting up your palm with a cigarette lighter. (Both are examples of objectivity.) But I can't prove to you I saw a ghost regardless if you saw one too at another time, in another place. I can't prove to you aliens exist regard if you believe it or not. (Both are examples of non-objectivity assumptions.)There is nothing about that video that proves a holy spirit. Just a bunch of Third World Pakistanis adopting a practice historically shown to have slaughtered the same race of people. http://www.historytoday.com...THE BIBLE (FIGURATIVELY) PROVES THE HOLY SPIRIT IS REALThe word figuratively says it all. Figuratively my name is Richard Cypher. But I'm literally not Richard Cypher. http://sot.wikia.com... Figuratively he is a Blade of Truth=http://www.debate.org... But literally he is just a man. The figuratives can go on and on. They prove nothing but delusion, fantasy, & roleplaying innocence. THE UNIVERSE PROVES THE HOLY SPIRIT IS REALWell, actually it literally proves matter exist--nothing else.Argument=Pro stated= "if I can prove the Trinity is real, I have more than proved my case.". So what does proving something consist of? Irving Copi wrote= "In some circumstances it can be safely assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of proof of its occurrence as positive proof of its non-occurrence." http://en.wikipedia.org... Copi says that only evidence of something that exist or occurred is provable. And if it did actually occurred qualified investigators would like find some evidence of it.Acts 2=nd when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. 2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. 3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. 4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. 5 And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. 6 Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. https://www.biblegateway.com...1. There is no physical evidence or eyewitness testimony apart from the bible that this event really occurred. No one secular historian has ever produced authenic evidence this event took place. Here's why"2. here came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind3. there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them4a. to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance4b. that every man heard them speak in his own language.5. What human language are they speaking? Is this anyone's own native tongue? Please go to 1:48; top video http://www.youtube.com...6. Listen to Anita. Really? Listen it is the SAME phonetic sounds ALL OVER AGAIN. bottom video http://www.youtube.com...that every man heard them speak in his own language. This is self-explanatory. Each single person had "the ability to speak in each one on native language and the other persons were able to understand them in their OWN language." http://www.debate.org... SummaryThe conflicting alleged works of the Holy Spirit to cause Christians to speak in tongues aka languages is verifiable proof it does not exist, it is not real. Mentally ill? If God told man to write the Bible in his words and God told them to write "speaking in (human) languages", then why do Christians attribute speaking in (human) languages to babbling sounds? How come the Greek word for tongues in the Act chapter has the human meaning for human language--and not babble or an unknown word? An unknown word would be some convincing evidence that the babble Anita spoke was indeed the language of angels or God. Is this not the sign of mental illness, for multiple people to invent an undecipherable phonetic ramble and not use an actual language? Not only is it lunacy, its a fraud, and its laughable.