Should we let black people handle their dirty work

My opponent said: "First of all, you sure have guts calling me a damn monkey. All whites are HUMANS I don't think you understand." For the record, my opponent is getting way off basis from the topic, however, my comment regarding Homo Sapiens in my previous argument, was to contradict my opponent's assumption that blacks "aren't human." Considering the fact that anatomically and genetically blacks and whites share the same genetic structure simply, identifying a different phenotype, is insufficient in designating that blacks are NOT human. Science has dictated that all people on this planet are human. My opponent said: "We are different from monkeys the same way sharks are different from fish." All bipedal hominids to the subspecies of Homo Sapiens which you and I are, share a common relationship with other former primates all the way to the Australopithecines which resided in Africa who were considered a chimp-like. Although we are not chimps or apes or gorillas, all human beings blacks included, have a common ancestor that migrated out of Africa whose features were that of chimpanzees. See: https://en.wikipedia.org... My opponent said: "Furthermore, whatever scum you pointed out was basically irrelevant, any white person could have done the same." Yet no white inventor during those times did. According to your logic in your previous arguments, blacks are inferior and incapable of performing complex tasks yet I just named only two black inventors who have created things we use today. I'm sure you can take solace in knowing that every time you're at a traffic light understand that the very people whom you've demonized as inferior, a black man had designed the very traffic light you have to obey.....How ironic. My opponent said: "Us HUMANS have actually done the contributing to society, and even if you sum up all of the "good things" the "good" monkeys have done, it is far outweighed by the destruction and disorder these barbaric dark skinned animals bring to our society." Actually history begs to differ. According to one source colonialism was one of the many causes of devastations of various ethnic people: "In 1838 and 1839, as part of Andrew Jackson's Indian removal policy, the Cherokee nation was forced to give up its lands east of the Mississippi River and to migrate to an area in present-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee people called this journey the "Trail of Tears," because of its devastating effects." Source: http://www.pbs.org... Another source regarding European colonialism states: "Colonial and Soviet powers often created situations that encouraged ethnic rivalry. For example, when the Soviets took control of the Ferghana Valley in Central Asia, they created boundaries that separated members of the same ethnic group (i.e. the Tajiks) into different multiethnic regions. "This enabled the Soviet authorities to continuously be called upon by the people of the region to help them manage conflicts that were bound to emerge as a result of these artificial divisions."[5] European and Soviet imperialists also sometimes favored one ethnic or religious group over other groups in the region. This practice of favoring one group, or of giving one group a higher status in colonial society, created and promoted inter-group rivalries." In addition: "The status, privilege, and wealth of colonial and Soviet ruling populations were often maintained and upheld through the use of policies that violated the human rights of those living in the colonized areas. Unjust policies subjected colonized populations to the loss of their lands, resources, cultural or religious identities, and sometimes even their lives. Examples of these brutal policies include slavery (e.g., British-controlled West Indies), apartheid (e.g., South Africa), and mass murder (e.g., the Incas of Peru, Aborigines of Australia, Hungarians after the 1956 uprising)." Source: http://www.beyondintractability.org... My opponent said: "Where are crime rates highest? Yup. Black Scum Neighborhoods." Let us look at one source regarding "crime rates in black scum, neighborhoods" shall we? According to the National Review regarding "black-on-black crime": "There"s no such thing as "black-on-black" crime. Yes, from 1976 to 2005, 94 percent of black victims were killed by black offenders, but that racial exclusivity was also true for white victims of violent crime"86 percent were killed by white offenders. . . ." Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com... "What [Breitbart writer Ben] Shapiro and others miss about crime, in general, is that it"s driven by opportunism and proximity; If African-Americans are more likely to be robbed, or injured, or killed by other African-Americans, it"s because they tend to live in the same neighborhoods as each other. Residential statistics bear this out (PDF); blacks are still more likely to live near each other or other minority groups than they are to whites. And of course, the reverse holds as well"whites are much more likely to live near other whites than they are to minorities and African-Americans in particular." Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com... My opponent said: "Who has the lowest income per-capita? You guessed it. Those ex-slave stable bucks." Regarding my opponent's above statement I would state that systemic/structural racism is still a problem in society which effects many minorities according to a scholarly article: "Experimental audit studies focusing on hiring decisions have consistently found strong evidence of racial discrimination, with estimates of white preference ranging from 50% to 240% (Cross et al. 1989, Turner et al. 1991, Fix & Struyk 1993, Bendick et al. 1994; see Pager 2007a for a review). For example, in a study by Bertrand & Mullainathan (2004), the researchers mailed equivalent resumes to employers in Boston and Chicago using racially identifiable names to signal race (for example, names like Jamal and Lakisha signaled African Americans, while Brad and Emily were associated with whites).2 White names triggered a callback rate that was 50% higher than that of equally qualified black applicants. Further, their study indicated that improving the qualifications of applicants benefited white applicants but not blacks, thus leading to a wider racial gap in response rates for those with higher skill." Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... My opponent said: "They would be better off in camps a-la Hitler or executed, and as President-elect Donald Trump said "What do you have to lose?" When dealing with exterminating monkeys... nothing" So you're a proponent of genocide? Let me remind my opponent that in the final round you must give your final argument regarding the topic.....