Death Penalty

Case 1: Hemorabi got it right!Have you ever heard the saying an eye for an eye? Hemorabi made that! In ancient Mesopotamia, Hemorabi was their ruler. He made a judicial system that went like this. You steal from me, I steal from you. You killed my family member, I kill you. The system worked to repel crime in Mesopotamia. It would be the opposite if we would ban the death penalty. People would not be afraid of the chair, and would commit more murders! They would think when they go to prison that they would rule it or escape!Case 2: More Execution Made Murder Drop!Puzzled by this discovery? You really shouldn't. It has been proven with sources such as The Bureau Of Criminal justice that more executions made murder take a substantial drop. As you see from this graph, as execution was at an all time low, murder was at an all time high. Here is another graph showing the correlation of murders and death penalties. The ultimately lower as the death penalty gets higher!A quote from Ernest Van Deg Haag "Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared. Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death... Therefore, a life sentence must be less deterrent than a death sentence. And we must execute murderers as long as it is merely possible that their execution protects citizens from future murder." Ernest Van Deg Haag Late Professor of Jurisprudence at Fordham University"For the Death Penalty," New York Times Case 3: The Death Penalty Is Moral!This is a quote from Bruce Fain, JD "The crimes of rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, murder, larceny, and perjury pivot on a moral code that escapes apodictic [indisputably true] proof by expert testimony or otherwise. But communities would plunge into anarchy if they could not act on moral assumptions less certain than that the sun will rise in the east and set in the west. Abolitionists may contend that the death penalty is inherently immoral because governments should never take human life, no matter what the provocation. But that is an article of faith, not of fact. The death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a free moral actor able to control his own destiny for good or for ill; it does not treat him as an animal with no moral sense." Bruce Fain, JD Constitutional Lawyer and General Counsel to the Center for Law and Accountability"Individual Rights and Responsibility - The Death Penalty, But Sparingly," www.aba.orgJune 17, 2008The death penalty is used for immoral people that committed a heinous crime. A crime that is not tolerated in modern day society. We call those people scum, garbage, filth. Well what do we do with garbage? We destroy it. A dog bites a child. He gets put down yet, you expect that if a human being kills a another human being, they should live?!?!? That is bull!Case 4: Over PopulationIf the death penalty is banned, many prisons will start to become over populated. With the rise in crime and lack of space, this may let wardens get killed and inmates escape. They may also fake like they didn't commit murder, or another heinous crime, or say they are sorry for it. Then, they might be released and be free to kill again! Why take the chance? If they are willing to dish it out, they should be willing to take the punishment.Ladies and Gentleman, I have proved that:The death penalty deters heinous crimeThe death penalty is moral justifiedRemoving the death penalty will have negative effects. Thank you!