Govt will use global warming and health issues as excuses to control every aspect of your life.

Observation 1: The resolution does not state or imply a specific government, resultiing in the realms of the debate to consist of the goverment in a global sense. Observation 2: I have the burdon of clash, my opponent the burdon of proof. AFF's Contentions: 1. Banning black and dark blue cars under the disguise of global warming. a) No media, often without statistic specialization, can declare the likelyhood of the outcome of a bill. This preposition is ludicrous, I will agree with my opponent. The bill was thought of by a (radical, in my opinion) citizen. This was presented to Congress by a Senator. The government denied this law, because they did not see the benefiets of it. It was not the governments idea, but a person. So I do not see how that is governments fault. 2. (subpoint) The govt will require all things that have black on it to repainted according to govts selection of acceptable colors. a) You are mistaking a probability as certainty. You do not know for sure if they will or not. 3) New york now regulates cooking oil of course under the pressure of being politically correct this has expanded throughout all the major food chains and will eventually become law in all fifty states. a) Again, you are mistaking a probability as certainty. You do not know for sure if they will or not. b) This is for fast food industries. You can still let your heart run wild with the fascenating magical wonders of cooking oil at your descretion however your heart desires. 4) Obstensively making it a felony for any one to have a garden in their back yard and grow their own vegetables without the permission of the gov't. a) Again, it is a bill, not a law. One that may not pass, so there is no need to get riled up about it unless it does pass. 5) (subpoint) This is so they can trace who you gave it to if in fact you did decide to give it to some one. a) How do you know? You sound a great deal like a 9/11 conspiritor supporter. Our government is obligated to protecting the citizens and until there is proof, we can not make accusations. This is irrelivant, but I see how passionate my opponent is and decided to dip some of my colo(u)rs on the page too. 6) This bill spells the death nell to all small farmers and farmers markets and cheap vegetables as paper work will be required on all transactions of all food so the govt can trace it to it's source of sale all the way to the end user. a) You don't know if it will be thier death. Blogs are not a legitimate source either. 7) "The smart grid for electricity" Govt will abuse this concept guaranteed 100% a) This doesn't go along with the resoultion and is outside the realms of this debate. Besides, do not have proof that they will 100%. 8) "Cap and trade" a) I can see you spent some time on this. However, it is not relevant to the debate topic. Which I am looking at right now, wondering if I should drink 2% milk or Vitamen D fortified. Maybe Chocolate Vitamen D. But 2%'s a classic. That's my main worry in life right now, just letting you all know. O-R-E-O's too. .. mmmm. Well, that's it I suppose. I hit everypoint and will move on to support my own case. A) There is no evidence to support this as a 100% garentee. That's my 1 and only main point. I emphasize 100% Good luck, friend.