No-one should be an organ donor in the event of their death

OutlineI. IntroductionII. Benefits of Organ DonationIII. ?????IV. SourcesI. IntroductionOrgan Donations are donations where a living or recently deceased person will give someone an organ with their consent, such as a kidney, for the better health of another. There are two different types of organ donations: living and deceased donations. Living donations are where living volunteers donate organs or structures such as skin, bone, muscles or blood vessels. Deceased donations are donations where a deceased person, who has volunteered to do so before death, may give organs, eye or tissue for a recipient (S1).II. Benefits of Organ DonationOf course, donating organs, tissue, or any other body parts posthumously will not harm the donater, being that the person is already dead and has no need to use them. Organ donation can save lives. According to DonateLife.net, over 119,000 people are awaiting lifesaving organ transplants. Every ten minutes, another person is added onto the national transplant waiting list. Twenty-two people die each day waiting for an organ (S2). One organ donor can save up to eight lives (S3). One common misconception about donating organs is that you will receive compensation, and may use this idea to argue that people may go as far as to steal organs or be desperate enough to give up their own to receive money. However, this is not the case. Selling organs in the US is against the National Organ Transplant Act, passed in 1984, which states that human organs cannot be exchanged for "valuable consideration," meaning any sort of financial value (S4).III. ?????I am fairly confused by my opponent's argument. He talks about how organ donations "devalue life," and says that "if I told someone I took my name off the register they would probably think I am selfish or think less of me." I do not know how to exactly respond to these comments. If anything, I think organ donations give more value to the life of both the organ donors and the recipient(s). It lets the organ donor seem more selfless and contributing to a noble goal, and lets the recipient be healthier, extending the lifespan of this person and possibly even giving them the opportunity to experience life in a way that they couldn't be while being bedridden, reliant on artificial organs and machines in a hospital. Additionally, if you think that saying that you took your name off an organ donation list is looked down upon, just don't say it. Your reasoning does not warrant the need to condemn organ donations or make them illegal.My opponent also talks about terrorism and money with "A good example to understand my point above is terrorism, if we believe that people should do whatever they want with their money and we drop some laws, people would give in to ransoms, and terrorists would continue to target people and hold them hostage because there is money to be made. Obviously people should not do whatever they want with their money, as lives would be put at risk." I honestly do not understand exactly why this was put in. Organ donations are optional. Nobody is holding a gun to a person's head, screaming at them to donate their organs.IV. Sources S1) https://www.donatelife.net...S2) https://www.donatelife.net...S3) http://www.liveonny.org...S4) http://www.livescience.com...