Resolve: Failled nations are a greater threat to the united states than stable nations

Hi there. I'd like to say, thank you to my Opponent forehand, so thank you B-ball_Grl78. <3 I will divide my argument into two forms: My resolve and My Negations. I will start my argument with Negations. Con has tried to prove that Stable nations are a greater threat to the US than unstable nations. She has used evidence of the two Nations of China and Iran. From the Nuclear perspective and Economic treat perspective. I have a single Point to each argument. (1)Nuclear Iran- Iran has signed the UN's Biological Weapons Convention and in the process of rataphying it, as well as Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [Citation: http://www.iaea.org...] of which it has signed and ratified. This treaty inhibits Iran from either using or developing nuclear arms under treat of economic execution destroying the Iranian economy. I understand that the Treaty was made in 1968 but Iran only Ratified the Treaty in 2007 which means by the treaties clauses state: Article I: Each nuclear-weapons state (NWS) undertakes not to transfer, to any recipient, nuclear weapons, or other nuclear explosive devices, and not to assist any non-nuclear weapon state to manufacture or acquire such weapons or devices. Iran is only under question if proven to have broken those terms post the year 2007. This same rule allows the US to elude the treaty by "Arms sharing" with countries yet to ratify: China, Brazil, even Spain. Note there's no proof that the US has used this but the possibility sustains. To conclude: Any fears by the US government are just part of "Project for the New American Century (see neo-colonism)" or simply unenforced paranoia. Argument Negated. (2) *Accepted.* But your claim sounds over "hipped". My Resolve I would like to start with the fact that Pro has ignored the other Stable nations and the little significant they have to the Stability to America Economically or in the Militarian perspective. With America as the single Superpower any nation stable or unstable that goes against America will mean inevitable defeat. I would like to elaborate on the Novel – "30 year war with Iran" by Ronen Bergmanand the Soviet-Afghan War. (1)The 30 year war with Iran is a book about Mossad's struggles with Iran and its aid of Middle Eastern unstable nations since Ayatollah Khomeini's revolution in 1979 Iran. It talks on how America and Israel gave Iran, Armed weapons of near modern level strength in the Iran-Iraq war and the treat it now possesses to the world. Iran as a government dares not fight America on a 1 to 1 war however Iran has given arms to its Arab League neighbors, from Sudan to Bangladesh. More Importantly It has added Jihads and Rebel Movement notably Al Qaeda but also the Palestinian Independence Jihad and Hezballah who posse a treat to the US via The Soviet Union Effect. [Citation: The book & Common History] (2)It is common Knowledge that the Soviet War with Afghanistan lead to the collapse of the Soviet Union. This effect is likely to happen again to the US. If *the or an* Unstable Middle Eastern nations where to fall to a Islamic Jihadist Revolution, where Total war is not an Option. The US would fall into a situation much like the current Iraq-Iran war consuming time and money. Yet, if the event of an Economic depression were to happen or a West to East shift in Economic balance were to happen the United States will collapse as a Superpower much like USSR did. Conclusion: Con has the task of either proving my resolve false or reinforce and defending her resolve. Queries- Please list all "unthreatening" unstable states. Note: I would add Citations but I don't have time. Cya and Good Luck.