The KCA is ridiculous.

Thank you for your arguments.1. Pro agrees that the universe does have a cause because of his understanding of Quantum physics and Relativity, but he also says that God doesn't have to be the cause of the universe and that there are other options. I do agree that God doesn't have to be the cause. However, it is more likely that God caused the universe. Why? Because when we look at the properties of the cause of the universe, it perfectly resembles what we call "God". For example, the cause of the universe must be unimaginable powerful as it bought the whole universe into existence. The cause of the universe must also be personal; for how else could a impersonal cause give rise to a temporal effect? As William Lane Craig rightly states, "For the effect of the universe to begin in time the cause must be a personal agent who freely chooses to create an effect in time." [1] Lastly, this cause must be timeless, spaceless and immaterial, because time, space and matter began at the "Big Bang" (or at the moment the universe came into being). In summary, this cause must be timeless, spaceless, immaterial, personal, and unimaginable powerful. Indeed, this cause is a being which basically everyone takes to be God. It is therefore more reasonable to believe that the cause of the universe was God, rather than believing that another universe or something caused it. 2. Pro said that there was energy before the big bang. However, talking about what happened or existed before the big bang, as Einstein himself rightly said, is just completely nonsensical. It's like asking what happens if you travel north of the North Pole. The fact of the matter is that we don't know what existed before the big bang. There are of course many different theories on what might have existed before the big bang, but these are just theories and without any valid evidences.Moreover, even if we grant that it is true that there was some kind of energy before the big bang, what exactly would this prove? That the cause of the universe cannot therefore be God? Or that that this energy itself created the universe? There is just no reasonably way that a kind of energy existing before the big bang could create something, let alone our universe. So all this energy nonsense doesn't really prove anything, nor is there any evidences which proves that some kind of energy existed before the big bang.3. Pro said: "God must too have had a cause or he cannot exist in the physical world and did not create the Universe." This just doesn't make sense. How does it follow that God cannot exist in the physical world and create the universe if he doesn't have a cause? Pro doesn't answer and explain this - rather, he simply just asserts things without supporting them with any evidences whatsoever.4. Pro said: "Either God is eternal and exists in a non physical universe, cannot interact with our universe and therefore is not all powerful, or God does not exist." What Pro is doing here is assuming that God, if he is eternal and exists in a non-physical universe, cannot interact with our universe and therefore is not all powerful. However, no evidences whatsoever to support this absurd claim is given. Accordingly, this claim must for now be dismissed.5. Pro said: "Yeah but God has always existed. First of all that contradicts exactly what you have just said , and secondly, I have already explained that if he exists he cannot be all powerful, and so you can't use the argument that he is exempt from the laws of physics." I can't see how God being eternal contradicts anything which I have said. Concerning God not being all powerful, you have not actually given any evidences to prove this.6. Pro said: "It is ridiculous to simply say that the laws of Physics do not apply to God. I find it to be a cheap way out of cosmology. You can't just, as soon as we come up with something that could make God unlikely or even impossible, say that that doesn't work with God though because he's all powerful."I agree that we cannot say that something doesn't work with God as soon as we come up with something that could make God unlikely or even impossible. As for the laws of physics not applying to God, I have 3 things to say on this. First and foremost, no reasons are given to support Pro's statement that it is ridiculous to say that the laws of physics doesn't apply to God. Secondly, even if we grant that it's true that it is ridiculous to say that the laws of physics doesn't apply to God, what exactly would this prove? That God cannot therefore be the cause of the universe, or that he cannot even exist? Please, elaborate. Thirdly, it must be noted that God created the physical world (the universe). God himself remains outside of the physical world and thus, the laws of physics doesn't apply to God. The laws of physics only apply to things in the physical and natural world, not anything beyond that.Pro has not successfully defended his claim that the KCA is ridiculous. All of Pro's arguments have been refuted, and many of them are not supported with any evidences whatsoever; they are rather simply just baseless claims. I turn it over to Pro._______Sources[1] William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland, The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, page 145.