Conservatism is a much better route to achieving a better country

I am very sorry that my opponent made attacks on her own misinterpretations of my case. I will have to correct the following statements my opponent has made, and then prove conservative lifestyle is the best in achieving a better country. Rebuttal 1. It is very interesting what my oppnent claims in her case. Conservatism limits freedom such as banning same-sex marriage, criminalizing marijuana use, and placing limits on sexual freedom and reproductive freedom.In fact, many conservatives want to return to earlier times, when women couldn't vote, schools were segregated, and homosexuality was a crime. The US is better off promoting liberal values instead of retaining longstanding prejudices against women, blacks, and homosexuals. But is my opponent right on her attacks. I will admit that horrible things happened during the conservative era such as slavery, women not being able to vote, schools segregated. and homosexuality as a crime. By using my opponent's logic, communism embraces Stalinism and will always evolve into stalinism. Communist governments kill there own people if there people revolt. Stalin killed christians who celebrated Christmas. This is a biproduct of Communism. This is the logic you would support if you were won by my opponent's argument. Sharing communism's name with Stalinism is a horrible idea because it is a lie itself. It does not say anything about the idea, but people will still point at Russia for being so cool. My opponent's logic can not uphold in this case. These were things that just happened during that time. Slavery was world wide. Britain practiced slavery. Hitler hated black people. So are you going to tie in the facist ideology with Hitler. I urge you not to accept my opponent's argument because it is illogical and can hold up as a lie. The same logic would apply to women. Woman were mistreated everywhere. It was in the status quo at that time. Do not hold the ideology responsible for human nature. We can fundamentally disagree on gay people, but that would have to be another debate. Marijuana, I also would funamentally disagree with you on. National Institute of Drug abuse Marijuana overactivates the endocannabinoid system, causing the “high” and other effects that users experience. These effects include altered perceptions and mood, impaired coordination, difficulty with thinking and problem solving, and disrupted learning and memory. Marijuana also affects brain development, and when it is used heavily by young people, its effects on thinking and memory may last a long time or even be permanent. A recent study of marijuana users who began using in adolescence revealed substantially reduced connectivity among brain areas responsible for learning and memory. And a large long-term study in New Zealand showed that people who began smoking marijuana heavily in their teens lost an average of 8 points in IQ between age 13 and age 38. Importantly, the lost cognitive abilities were not fully restored in those who quit smoking marijuana as adults. If you want that kind of reality for you or your kids than vote con. 2. Liberalism- My opponent argues that liberalism appeals more to American ideals such as freedom. But allowing your people to smoke marijuana, and letting them lose cognitive abilities and have there IQ scores go down is absurd to me. If you accept my opponent's logic, than I should drive my car how fast I want to drive it. I don't have to wear my seat belt. It feels like my opponent's logic works for all of these things, so if you have been won over by my opponent's arguments, well than let people start speeding. My opponent notes that conservatism keeps society at the same pace, but I would also note that Conservatism helped build America. Its amazing how in just 200 years America went to space. Our fundamentals kept us strong. Our funamentals have helped middle class people become rich. It is our funamentals that keept us alive. Defense 1. My opponent argues Frederick Douglas, and that there was no family behind his success. Well, let me refrain and say that the majority of rich people have had families behind them. But, I will admit that my opponents argument seemed to win me over. That is why middle class people's children are getting better education. That is why the middle class kids are just magicaly getting common sense and are deciding to learn without no inspiration. This is my opponent's logic and if you are won over by it than you probably believe in ghosts or extremely idealistic. 2. My opponent tries to dismis my arguments on self-made people by saying I offered no sources. My sources were books, and I tried to make a short summary of what these books were, but if it pleases you than here are my sources. http://www.amazon.com... http://www.amazon.com... http://www.amazon.com... Tell me in the next case if you have read any of them. My opponent makes the claim that Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were just computer geniuses. Its not like anyone every told them about hardwork, making good grades, and religion. If they were born in the hood they still would have made it because they just were naturually geniusess. Read George Washington's book. I think its safe to say you would have inaccurate analytics on him just as you did with Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. I provided a well-known doctor who was raised in Detroit and is a black person. He became wealthy off of conservative traditions. http://www.amazon.com... Calling my argument racist is an insult, not a rebuttal. Using my oppnent's logic, white prevelage is racist to me and other whites, because we are not privledged at all. But, we don't overeact and start throwing out insufficiently informed analytics that state your racist for accusing whites of being privledged. When I make a fair critique on black households that is not being racist that their lifestyle needs to have a change so they can stop dominating jail populations. If they had good upbringings such as the upbringings of Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, George Washington, Dr. Carson, they could do well. I guess anyone who has ever wrote a critique on Obama is racist. I guess anyone who has ever wrote a critique on Kevin Hart is racist. The last time I saw real racism was when people were literally pissed off because they saw a black person drink water. I think that the last argument is an engine of absurdity influenced by an ever evolving political correctness. Blaming our system for being racist is a very human thing for african americans to do. But, as well-educated blacks such as Dr. Carson know, the problem does not lie in the government it lies in the people. The absence of the father and mother is totally unacceptable to conservative philosophy. Ben Carson benefited from conservative philosophy and he was raised in Detroit. The point that I made here and the reality liberals will not accept here is the conservative lifestyle worked. It worked with Ben Carson. It worked with Bill Gates and it worked with alot of other rich people. I want to apply the same philosophy to other people. I want blacks to have more rich people in there statistics. We can do it thanks to conservative philosophy. Liberals have only proved that they can capture the media. Vote for a better reality for America.