God Exists

“To begin I will make my own case then refute my opponents argumentation.” Well that you didn’t because what you did do is copy and paste your information from somewhere in order for you to make a case and you know it. And for you to sit there and try to pretend that what you composed it all out of your bionic babbling baby brained reject is a joke. And its so obvious. The way you present yourself is like a burnt out christmas tree on crack is so obvious. You did invent excuses, something I told you NOT to do unless you wanted to be insulted and or I would walk away. Either way, it looks like I will do both because of your first paragraph.So you have one shot and one shot only, exactly where did you get your information from? I want to look it up and see exactly how much B.S. it is. Because the numbers you’ve presented are so far off its completely laughable. After all, how can they possibly be true from nothing that has been found?Oh and btw, YOUR god is 0% because after all, if there is only supposed to be “one”, in which your bible doesn’t claim that at all, in which your god is absolutely unproved in the first place, then he’s 0%. So Its takes A LOT more faith to believe in your god. Richard Dawkins is a 100% evolutionist. That’s his conclusion. Fred Hoyle is an atheist. Stephen C. Meyer notes believes in intelligent design which you could call it for what it is… creationism so he’s tossed out. Great wonderful. How does ANY of your first 3 paragraphs prove YOUR god? Dawkins and Hoyle reject YOUR god. 1. “I have already provided Large quantities of scientific evidence.” Oh no you most certainly haven’t because you completely ignored the video before it "Christianity Debunked Using Science and History" Richard Carrier. Now pay attention to what was stated… “atheism by default” because Richard Carrier did in fact prove his case. You’ve only strengthened the case for atheism and your god not existing by mentioning hard core atheists such as Richard Dawkins. 2. Well see, had you bothered to read the entire line of questioning, in which clearly you did not, its all clumped together. 3. “I would redirect you to the 1 in 700 quintillion chance of the earth existing randomly,” And who made that claim? 4. "There"s absolutely no evidence for their god. None" I think I've provided a fair bit of evidence. Absolutely not have you because if you had, then you’d be the only quadrillionaire on the planet and your god would be the only one worshiped. Period. And you wonder why I shouldn’t insult you? Try harder. 5. “ the freedom to choose has always been integral to the Christian faith.” Absolutely 100% false. You show me anywhere in your bible where it states something, anything to the nth degree like “I the lard thy god grants man free will/ the ability to choose.” In fact there 0% of anything like that in his bible, which is laughably the only thing you have to go on in which no god would EVER use, a printed text, so you get get it wrong as you have clearly done right here. Oh and oh yeah. I haven’t even gotten into the free will issue. IF you believe in YOUR god in absolutely no way do you have free will. NONE. 6. "The Bible which is in TEXT form, which is clearly not evidence, in which no god would EVER use, the worst form of communication possible, with copies upon copies and translations upon translations, with no updates in at least 2,000 years, and no possible way to trace it back to the original, so EVERYBODY misinterprets this so-called holy book, no exceptions, none. So this Bible is essentially a useless pile of scrapping without proof of anything." A. Oh absolutely to YOUR god text is the worst form of communication possible.But there you go again, flat out inventing excuses. B. THERE’S ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR ANYONE TO HAVE TRANSLATED ANYTHING IN TEXT FORM ------------ EVER. But then again Aron Ra’s quote drifted right by you and or you CLEARLY didn’t read it. . ConclusionLook, if I am going to present you with actual evidence, and you are not even going to pay any attention to it, in other words to slaughter you, then what’s the point? Because you have not read the evidence, I am ending this round. So if you wish this debate to continue, then you are required to examine the evidence that is put forth to you and not skip over it and do the best you can with it. And for god's sake don't invent excuses. Also you have a way out... you say "I don't know" to something in which you don't know rather than B.S.ing me as you know you have done.