The Christian flavor of God is immoral

I negate: The Christian flavor of God is immoral. [Definitions] God: The authoritative omniscient being over morals. The creator of the universe. Immoral: deliberately violating accepted principles of right and wrong. ================================================================================= Topical Negation: 1. Since God is the being behind morals, the authoritative being, and totally good, then God cannot be immoral. Therefore, the resolution has a flaw. [Contentions] Contention I: The Christian God is one of love. The God posed by Christians emphasizes love over all. Jesus said: "Love your enemy as yourself." No thing is more moral then this. Love is the greatest of all virtues. Since the Christian God is love, then the Christian God is moral. Contention II: Morality God created morals. Morals is what is right and what is wrong. God cannot be immoral on the fact that God is morality. Morality derives from him/her. He is the fountain from which right conduct comes from. Anything opposite to God is immoral. Therefore God cannot be immoral for he is morality. Contention III: Hell is necessary for morality If hell did not exist, i.e. only heave existed, then there would be no check on morality. If the deterrence of hell did not exist, then there is no need for morality. If there is no hell, then humans could do whatever they wanted and still go to heaven. People like Osama Bin Laden could still make it into heaven without an repercussions of his earthly actions. I.e. terrorist attacks. Hitler would not suffer for making the holocaust and killing more then 6 million people. Stalin would not be held accountable for killing 15 million of his own people. Now, all this happened with the existence of hell. Think of what would happen with no hell. People on earth would not be held accountable for immoral actions. so essentially, if there was no hell then immorality would be rampant. Thus, God would be acting immoral without hell. [Rebuttal] I concede his 2 given premises about God existing and Hell existing. "I argue that the omniscient creator of all things cannot coexist with Hell and be considered Loving, Just or Moral." My Response: I will go through each adjective my opponent has set up. 1. Loving: He believes that hell cannot coexist with a loving God. This is a faulty premise. That is like saying that a parent isn't a loving parent if they punish their child. God is the father of us all. A father is loving but must be stern. Also, would he have to punish if we did his word? Essentially, the evil people send themselves to hell. It's by their actions that they are punished. It is acting immorally that sends them to hell. 2. Just: Justice is giving each their due. Hell exists to hold people accountable for their immoral actions on earth. If you do the crime, you do the time. For a life time of immoral acts, hell is your punishment. You have betrayed that of which created you and gave you life. Because of this, he is giving each sinner their due. This makes him just. 3. Moral: Link my contention that hell is necessary for morality. I'll explain further. God would be immoral by not having a place where sinners have their due. God would be making sinners and good people equal. He would be making immorality morality. For morality to be in it's purest form, then hell is necessary. I urge a negation. Thank you ladies and gentlemen.