The God of the Jews exists, and Judaism, as explained by Orthdoxy, is the correct religion.

"'I have explained that it would be unreasonably cruel to start a religion through a single prophet. Judaism is the only religion that has not done this.' You say this, but how does that disprove any other religion? We are not debating based off of your old testament. Why would God not send just one person? He used Moses to lead his people to the promise land. That was one man." The logic of this is not based off The Old Testament (incidentally, you say it is "my old testament" but it is actually the Christians Old Testament. It is the only testament for Jews). It is based off any understanding of God. If He wanted us to do something, He would not tell us through one person. That would be unreasonably cruel. People could not determine if that person was telling the truth. Therefore, they could not be blamed for believing that the prophet was a hoax. I have made this argument before, and you have not refuted it. Additionally, Moses was a political and spiritual leader, as were all the Jewish prophets, but God spoke directly to every living Jew and informed them what He wanted from them, as well as the fact that Moses was in charge. This is explicitly stated in the Bible multiple times. Naturally, it would get around the problem of proof if God told you that man was a prophet. Additionally, it is impossible to make up this lie. A person cannot claim that thousands of people spoke to God when he cannot produce those people or their descendants. No other religion claims something even remotely close. You still have not got around this. It is impossible to get around this. "When I stated evolution I was stating it as an example.You would have to prove everything wrong except Judaism in order to prove that Judaism is the correct religion." I have proved every religion wrong except Judaism. No religion follows the basic logic of not relying on one prophet except Judaism. Also, what, exactly, where you stating evolution as an example of? Evolution is a theory concerning the rise of life, not the creation of the universe. The two things have nothing to do with each other. You are attempting to bring an example of an alternative theory to answer a question that the theory does not address. Apples and oranges. "Let me give you another example of something, Solipsism. How do you know that any of this exists? It may just be your mind that exits and it is making everything up for you. There may not even be a universe. Can you disprove it?" Certainly. Solipsism is an immature argument. It essentially recreates the entire universe inside your head. It does not simplify anything, and adds labels to everything, and does not conform to Occam's Razor. [1] Besides, it is also irrelevant to this argument. If the universe is truly in my head, then the rules I have dictated for it force God to exist in the universe in my head. Thus God exists in the universe. My opponent has not put up any significant arguments, and I have destroyed the feeble ones he has put up. He has not successfully contradicted the line of logic in my opening arguments. Vote pro. [1] http://www.freivald.org...