It is probable for God to exist

I have seen many of your debates and couldn't be more thrilled that you accepted it. I wish you the very best of luck as I know this is going to be a challenge. C1: The attributes of God are contradictory [1]C1.1) Omnipotence-Omniscence1. Anything with logically incompatible properties cannot exist. (This is not arguable)2. Any God that knows the future is powerless to change it, and is therefore not omnipotent.3. Omniscience is logically incompatible with omnipotence. (2)4. God is described as having omniscience and omnipotence. (Given)5. Therefore, God does not exist. (1) (3) (4)Allow X to represent anything in the future. Now, let's assume that God is at least omniscient to determine whether or not the addition of omnipotence is possible.1. God knows that X will occur in the future. (Given by God's definition)2. In order for something to qualify as knowledge it must be factually correct. (This is not arguable)3. The knowledge that X will occur is only factually correct if X actually occurs. (2)4. The knowledge that X will occur logically necessitates its occurrence. (3)5. The logical necessity of X occurring precludes the possibility of alternative outcomes. (4)6. Omnipotence is impossible if alternative outcomes can't occur for a situation. (This is not arguable)7. Omniscience and omnipotence are logically incompatible. (6)8. Therefore, God cannot be both omniscient and omnipotent. (7)C1.2) Just v. MericfulAmong many other things, God is often defined as both Just and merciful.1. God is just (given).2. God is merciful (given).3. Mercy is getting less than what you deserve (by definition).4. Just is getting exactly what you deserve (by definition).5. Therefore, a person cannot be both all-just and all-merciful as God is defined.6. Therefore, God cannot exist. C1.3) Perfect v. Creation [2]1. If God exists, then he is perfect. 2. If God exists, then he is the creator of the universe. 3. If a being is perfect, then whatever he creates must be perfect. 4. But the universe is not perfect. 5. Therefore, it is impossible for a perfect being to be the creator of the universe (from 3 and 4). 6. Hence, it is impossible for God to exist (from 1, 2, and 5). C2: Argument from Non-believeu [3] Let set P be defined as the set of the following propositions: (a) There exists the god of theism. (b) The god of theism loves humanity, and (c) This being wants each person to be saved by having certain beliefs sufficient for salvation, such as beliefs P1. .. Pn. 1. If god exists, then god wants what is best for each person. 2. What is best for each person is that he or she is saved. 3. Therefore, if god exists, then god wants each person to be saved by having the beliefs of set P. 4. If god wants everyone to be saved by having the beliefs of set P, then everyone would have the beliefs of set P. 5. Not everyone has the beliefs of set P. 6. Therefore, god does not want everyone to be saved by having the beliefs of set P. 7. Therefore, god does not exist. Premise 1 is unproblematic given God's definition of omni-benevolence. P2 is also unproblematic by definition. I wait my opponent's opening arguments to try and convince me that God exists. _________SOURCES1. . http://www.debate.org...;(Freeman's debate).2. . http://www.infidels.org...3. . http://www.infidels.org...