Which religion is true

Your previous remarks, with my answers in {curly girly brackets.} Science is not a religion it is a process, it doesn't require faith to test a hypnosis, but rather the opposite. {Did you see what you wrote? "it doesn't require faith to test a hypnosis..." LMAO! Thank you for the laugh! Don't worry, I know what you meant.} {When you say "just the opposite," then my grammar book says what you mean is "it requires a hypothesis to test faith," but I'm rather certain that's NOT what you mean! :-) } {Christianity is a religion AND it is a process, to wit: as a sinner you realize that you can not escape your sinful nature, then you recognize the inspired nature of scripture, then you allow Jesus to "come into your heart," then you take a dunk in the baptismal fount to signify being 'born again,' then you live a new life until you die and go to heaven. Christianity, therefore, proves that a religion can also be a process.} It [science] is in fact skeptical by nature (by which I mean that science refuses to regard anything as true until the proposition in question is proven). {Here you're sort of anthropomorphising science. Science is an abstract--it isn't skeptical of anything, nor does it regard anything. The SCIENTISTS who theorize and discover things are only human and they DO fall into traps like saying, "Well, the consensus on this issue is thus-and-such," knowing full well that a consensus opinion doesn't count for anyting until thus-and-such is actually proved. For instance, quite a few scientists have claimed to have observed other moons around earth besides the big one which we all love and adore. Unfortunately their observations couldn't be duplicated and they were all eventually dismissed as cranks.} In addition science has no godhead no mythos mythology, and best of all when science is wrong it doesn't hurt my belief in it it merely changes to fit this new understanding. {BULLSHORTS!!! No godhead? Certainly you jest! The Holy Trinity of Science is Math, the father; Physics, the son; and Biology the Holy Ghost. Math is the Revealed Word of being that describes the relationship between all things. This Word is our only source of absolute truth. With the introduction of particles and objects into an otherwise devoid cosmos, mathematical relationships of number, size, length, speed, etc. all concurrently came into being. But without biology, without some sentient witness to all that occurred, the matter would be of little significance.} {As to 'mythos,' well, this is where Corticle Rider was talking about dark matter, and the 'locus of the id, or superego,' or a host of other conjectural 'gods' or 'spirits' or mysterious forces. We describe them, we have faith that they exist, but there is no way to prove them (currently.)} In regards to faith, I can believe literally anything on faith, god, Allah, Santa or the tooth fairy. {See previous point.} I suppose you could believe scientific hypothesis on faith as well but I think if you do you've missed the point, not only that your missing out on the best thing about science. {As I've mentioned before, the faith in one's hypothesis is the only thing that keeps that hypothesis alive. When we brought back bags of moon rocks and there was no cheese in the bag, thousands of kids lost their faith in that notion!} The opportunity for your beliefs to grow and evolve as our understanding of the universe does. In conclusion I ask you, if you can believe literally anything based on faith, true or not, then how is faith a good avenue to the truth. {Also as mentioned before, NO ONE THAT I'M AWARE OF is saying that faith is an avenue to truth. You're the only person I've seen who expresses such a red herring! Faith leads to salvation, allegedly, in the Christian New Testament. If you're Islamic you probably adhere to the arkan al-iman which is the six articles of faith. Iman is that you believe in God and His Angels and His Books and His Messengers and the Hereafter and the good and evil fate [ordained by your God]. Faith again leading to salvation. Since the Hindus largely believe that they receive blessings in this life by praying to their personal god, faith is the avenue to happiness, to safe keeping, to increased wealth, etc., not necessarily to truth.} Now this question is only important if you actually care wether or not you to hold as many true beliefs as possible and as few false beliefs as possible. {Well, if you and I are one day both surprised to find out that there really is some great and terrible God who demands our faith, then I suppose we'll be quick to change our minds, but in general this a satement that I think I can agree with. Besides, if I ever feel my soul is being subsumed by demonic spirits, at least I know they can be cast into a heard of swine ;-) } So I guess now the debate becomes is it important to hold true beliefs whenever possible and to reject beliefs, even those which mighty be comforting to us if there is no evidence to support that beliefs. {Well, now you have to define evidence. You and I say that we see no evidence of God, and the person nexts to us points to the ground and says, "You're standing on it." It boils down to the ever popular argument of which is more likely, that something just ka-bopped itself into being, or that a beneficent God did that for us. Physics is trying to find reasons why nothingness might be unstable. Good luck with that Mr. Krauss. Good luck communicating with your God Pope Franny.}