"pedophile" is a Blasphemy on Honored Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H)

In the name of Allah Most Gracious, Most Merciful.I would like to tell the readers the reason of debate was My Contender's allegation on My Honored and Beloved Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)But in his first argument there are several fallacies...Fallacies of Contender:Cherry picking (fallacy):Defined as suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position.He is picking those which suit him and ignoring the other side of the picture...I would like to ask... [Con has to answer as we would share BOP]1. Who are these people?2. Are they Qualified Scholars? Thier Names even My contender does not knows their names..? Thier Beliefs? Are they actually Muslims or Just some Non Muslim Arabs Acting?3. and Cut and Chopped 3 minutes clips can never qualify as a Contention! [The videos are from a Social Media(YouTube)-Unreliable Source]Even if we considered [though I do not consider these as any evidence] any of these videos not a single is saying that "She was a Child" according to the definition of puberty..The Videos says that she reached the Age of Puberty since Normally Girls reach the age of Puberty at the age of 8-12, and in Warm Countries the Age is Reduced.. even that is also True. [1] and that also proves that she was not a Child!I would firstly like to give Scholars with Name and Thier Recognaiton who accept that the Age has been Misktaken..Video-1 ( Javed Ahmad Ghamidi is a well-known Pakistani Islamic scholar, exegete, and Educationalist. A former member of the Jamaat-e-Islami, who extended the work of his tutor, Amin Ahsan Islahi)http://www.youtube.com...Video-2 (Dr. Ammar Nakshawani)http://www.youtube.com...Video-3 http://www.youtube.com...Video-4 (Dr. Jamal Badawai)http://www.youtube.com...Video-5 (Dr. Shahzas Saleem)http://www.youtube.com...So Here we have many Scholars who agree with what I presented..Con says: The first is the most compelling, because this scholar states there are SEVEN, not one, but SEVEN, hadith, many narrated by Aisha herself, which state she was betrothed at the age of six, and that the marriage was consummated when she was 9. He also states that "weak Muslims" attempt to claim she was eighteen because they are afraid to confront Christians with the truth.Rebuttal:I think My contender fails to realized what I presented why we have to prefer other narrators over this particular one.. Yes There may be 7 Hadith but all are transmitted Through "A person who suffered Alzheimer's Badly and There is NO OTHER ONE WHO CLAIMS THAT Not Even His Own Students""A chain is only as strong as its weakest link" We can not rely on This Chain and decide what Ayesha(R.A) said so we are obliged to explore the History ..My arguments were 100% accurate according to "The Science of Hadith" consider the following definationThe Science of Hadith: A common historical method in Islam, hadith studies consist of a careful examination of the isnad(citations), or chain of transmission accompanying each hadith.The isnad is carefully scrutinized to see if the chain is possible (for example, making sure that all transmitters and transmittees were known to be alive and living in the same area at the time of transmission) and if the transmitters are reliable. The scholars reject as unreliable people reportedto have lied (at any point), as well as people reputed to be heedless (and thus likely to misunderstand the saying).[2]My Contender have not refuted any of My Presented Argumentsand we have no Ground to Reject what I presented.. I'm Sure If This is Presented to "Those Unknown Unidentified Scholars" they would understand it and change thier views about Prohpet's Marraige..Arguments Extended...I wait for Con's Contentions.______________________________My Contender can FF the debate by saying "Agreed" if He has nothing to say so It would save time of Many..I Thank people for Reading This..--Peace