BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Lara Croft (Tomb Raider game) versus The Butcher (Diablo game): Lara would win.

To add to my original argument (as my opponent forfeited Round 2 I have nothing to write here in terms of any rebuttal, nothing to refute) -- Lara packs grenades, and could toss some powerful grenades at The Butcher. Also, she can use her Adrenaline to move fast and sudden, evade chase from The Butcher or dodge an attack by him.
Lara Croft (Tomb Raider game) versus The Butcher (Diablo game): Lara would win.

Lara will whoop the Butcher, although she may suffer some non-lethal damage from his rather large cleaver blade weapon. Here is my reasoning why she will win in a fight to the death: Lara is fast and she can keep retreating while shooting, firing off her double pistols while the lard-arse Butcher tires and moves slowly. The Butcher has no ranged weapons, he must get close to Lara. Lara can keep her distance, firing pistols and shotgun, or even harpoon the fat bastard with her spear gun. Lara can run into a nearby room that has jail type gating, then fire through the bars as the Butcher stands helpless on the other side of the bars, walking back and forth as an easy target like a duck at a Carnie’s shoot the ducks game. If the Butcher corners Lara, she can hop onto his head, do a flip, land behind him and execute a flying kick to push the fat bastard back against the wall. LMAO as I compose this debate argument! :)
Lara Croft (Tomb Raider game) versus The Butcher (Diablo game): Lara would win.

If it were possible for the game character Lara Croft from Tomb Raider (e. g. Tomb Raider Underworld) to enter the game world of Diablo and face 'The Butcher' (dungeon level 2), Lara would win in an all out battle to the death. Given that the other lower class monsters (bats, skeletons, zombie) on that dungeon level were first cleared out by Lara. Given no game cheats are used. Given that Lara's character is at a stamina and vitality level as when she starts out in the game Tomb Raider Underworld.
Xbox 360 is better than PS3

//1- Graphics- Xbox 360 beats PS3 on graphics. Also, Xbox 360 has far less loading times than the PS3. All the games in XBOX 360 llook better, run better, and less lag and jutter. 2- Xbox Live- Xbox Live is FAR better than PSN. It has netflix ... the PS3 does now too, but you need to put in a CD to play it. Xbox 360 just stream it even up to 1080p, Xbox 360 and xbox games for download, DLC comes first ( usually ) and sometimes its exlusive, now has Last FM radio, facebook, twitter. The PS3 is so complicated to develop ( for games ) that even games like Uncharted 2 were using over 90% of the systems power. Its a great game, and very good looking. BUT the 360 can do better, graphically speaking. The 360 also can process more information faster and more efficient, meaning games ( when used right which is 90% of the time ) will be "slower", have less of a framerate then the 360. // //This is totally irrelevant to our debate// Later in your argument, you state facts in the exact same way as I do, and my arguments are irrelevant as opposed to yours? By copy pasting from a site, I am including actual facts, not just saying: //Also, Xbox 360 has far less loading times than the PS3. All the games in XBOX 360 llook better, run better, and less lag and jutter.// and assuming that my opponent would accept it. May I ask from which source do you know this? I can quote an acquaintance, Jacob Park, who said, "I just played Xbox, never tried PS3." If I am correct, this "Jacob Park" is you, so if you've only played Xbox, where would you have known about loading speeds. If you present a valid source, then I may listen to you. I shall be expecting your rebuttal.
Xbox 360 is better than PS3

Thank you for your response.First of all, I must ask you not to copy-and-paste from other websites.(by the way, if you are also interested in making money on the web, you should also check this web page describing Google Ambush, the next generation of money making on the web).•The Ten Best Applications for the Apple MacIntosh•How to get TV content for the iPod Video•Creating your own iPod screen design•Microsoft Zune: the Good and Bad of the MP3 Player•How to become a computer programmer•GooglePackThis is totally irrelevant to our debate, and shows that you have copied and pasted from another website.Also, you have stated all the information of PS3, which has nothing to do with supporting your argument, which is that PS3 is better than Xbox 360. I must ask you to stay on topic, and please be a good opponent.1- Graphics- Xbox 360 beats PS3 on graphics. Also, Xbox 360 has far less loading times than the PS3. All the games in XBOX 360 llook better, run better, and less lag and jutter.2- Xbox Live- Xbox Live is FAR better than PSN. It has netflix ... the PS3 does now too, but you need to put in a CD to play it. Xbox 360 just stream it even up to 1080p, Xbox 360 and xbox games for download, DLC comes first ( usually ) and sometimes its exlusive, now has Last FM radio, facebook, twitter. The PS3 is so complicated to develop ( for games ) that even games like Uncharted 2 were using over 90% of the systems power. Its a great game, and very good looking. BUT the 360 can do better, graphically speaking. The 360 also can process more information faster and more efficient, meaning games ( when used right which is 90% of the time ) will be "slower", have less of a framerate then the 360. I will be waiting for your rebuttal.
Xbox 360 is better than PS3

You have just stated that it requires even more money to run all of its possible application. I think taking a break from playing for a week is superior than spending a bunch of money to just play for a few weeks. Plus: Advantages of the PS3 There are several advantages for the PS3 when viewed in comparison to the Xbox360 and the Wii. This is a result of the long period of development that took Sony to develop this new game console. Among the advantages, we can list the following: •Processing capacity: the PS3 comes with a new processor developed specially for this console. The Cell processor, as it is know, is based on the PowerPC processor by IBM. It has four processors into the same ship, thus it provides much more computational power. The resulting graphs created with the chip are almost life-like. It is a major advance in quality of video games. •Extensibility: the PS3 is now extensible, and users can download new software from the Internet. This will allow that bugs be removed by an automatic update. PS3 availability The PS3 was launched in the last months, first in Japan, and then in USA and Europe. It is recognized that Sony couldn't meet the demand for the new product, therefore the availability of the PS3 is very limited. Your best bet to get your hands in a PS3 is to search on auction web site, such as eBay. Bellow in this page you can see a small list of available PS3 units been sold in eBay. The poor availability at this time make the price of PS3 to increase on those auctions. It is not rare to seem some units of the PS3 to sell to as much as $2000. •Web access: the connectivity of the PS3 allows users to access the Internet, and use its main functions, such as web browsing, and file sharing. •Blue-ray player: Sony championed the development of blue-ray format, and now it provides a Blue-ray player with each PS3. Users will be able to watch movies, access files, and use allfunctionality in the Blue-ray disks. In fact, the PS3 is the cheapest Blue-ray player on the market (and it can do much more than playing movies). •Abundance of titles: The PS3 can play most titles for PS2. This means the majority of all game titles for game consoles. It is an strategic advantage for users, who want to continue using theirpreferred games. (by the way, if you are also interested in making money on the web, you should also check this web page describing Google Ambush, the next generation of money making on the web). •The Ten Best Applications for the Apple MacIntosh •How to get TV content for the iPod Video •Creating your own iPod screen design •Microsoft Zune: the Good and Bad of the MP3 Player •How to become a computer programmer •GooglePack
Xbox 360 is better than PS3

Thank you for debating against me.The PS3 online subsrciption is free as opposed to a $50 pay per year.First of all, your information is incorrect, since the Xbox Live costs $59.99 per year. Please use correct information with evidence.The letter P is sexy Also, this information is totally based on your opinion, and have no support to back up this argument, which means that this argument is invalid. First of all, Xbox Live is secured online gameplay, unlike PS3 blu-ray player. As Brandon Kim, a PS3 owner, stated, "I couldn't play the whole spring break, because someone hacked blu-ray"In Xbox Live, it is not hackable, and worth $59.99 per year, for secured and exciting gameplay.Also, there are many exclusive offers from Xbox Live, which sometimes offers $9.99 per 3 months and etc.Thank you for reading my speech, and I'll be waiting for your rebuttal.
Xbox 360 is better than PS3

You still do not give reasonable sources. I have more information, and from credible sources. You only argue about my reasons and the validity of these debates. Now it is my turn to tell you to focus on what's important here, facts and sources. You refused to answer to me directly quoting you, which would mean that you admit to making up info about loading speeds and generally saying nothing of complete validity. Why would I need more arguments in round 3 when I gave double the arguments you have just in round 2. You try to give fact, give accusations, but I say to you your debate skills are too few. PS3 has nearly everything free, better games, and better CDs It plays Blue Ray, and those who can see will know to agree. The chips it got are nothing compared to yours Its so fast even Xbox fanboys will adore BUZZARD out Thanks for this debate, now let the public decide.
Xbox 360 is better than PS3

Thank you again for responding to my argument.Here, since you wanted me to present to you a source, I have found one: http://shoryuken.com...And earlier in Round 3, don't you admit that this has nothing to do with our debate?You wrote:(by the way, if you are also interested in making money on the web, you should also check this web page describing Google Ambush, the next generation of money making on the web).•The Ten Best Applications for the Apple MacIntosh•How to get TV content for the iPod Video•Creating your own iPod screen design•Microsoft Zune: the Good and Bad of the MP3 Player•How to become a computer programmer•GooglePackAnd I have stated my arguments correctly, since it's on topic, arguing why Xbox 360 is better than PS3 by it's performance. Secondly, you've also stated: 'Later in your argument, you state facts in the exact same way as I do, and my arguments are irrelevant as opposed to yours?'This statement is invalid, since all my arguments were either promoting the performance of Xbox 360, or stating reasons why PS3 is bad. Finally, I've only heard counter-rebuttal from you, but NONE of your arguments in Round 3. Did you run out of ideas or arguments? Therefore, voters, I STRONGLY suggest you to vote for the Pro side.The con side have failed to support his arguments, and also stated irrelevant arguments.
It's morally permissible to kill domestic abusers

Resolved: It is morally permissible for victims to use lethal force as a deliberate response to repeated domestic violence.Since this was an old LD topic, the debate will be done in such a manner. The round set up will be done in the following manner.Round One: AcceptanceRound Two: Aff case, Neg case and rebuttalsRound Three: Aff rebuttals, neg rebuttalsRound Four: Aff rebuttals, neg types "no round as agreed upon", to maintain speaking turn consistency.If you are not familiar with what LD is, I HIGHLY RECCOMMEND YOU DO NOT ACCEPT THIS DEBATE.Gl to my opponent.
Santa Clause is evil

"Please to recollect that this species of [assertion] is a most useful animal, well adapted for the ends for which nature intended him. He alone, by constantly returning to the charge, and repeating the same [half-truths] and the same requests, succeeds in awakening attention to the cause which he advocates, and obtains that hearing which is granted him at last for self-protection, as the minor evil compared to his importunity, but which is requisite to make his cause understood." source: http://www.gutenberg.org...
We should elect Joseph Kony as Supreme Commander of Earth.

As this is the last round, I will try to not bring up anything new, but only respond to old points or points that my opponent made in his last round.My opponent's claim that if we had a massive DDO orgy we would spread STD's is inherently false. The very condition of acceptance into the bunker, as outlined in the first round of my first source, was that no member in the bunker would have STDs of any kind. So there would be no STDs to spread, making your rebuttal false.Also, Koopin's just squeemish of saying who admitted to AIDs because he admitted to me that he was one of those people. I, however, am not afraid of childishly pointing a finger at someone, and will always do so with reckless abandon.Also, while Thaddeus may make a law to get all the womenz, Grony would outlaw the entire idea of the DDOrgy, as his religion would frown on it and would cause him to be smited with heavenly wrath. This would prevent us from having the bunker, which would mean we would all die when 2012 came about.And the feminists would not uprise against Thad because all of the feminists on thsi site love Thad. LDF, a prominent feminist herself (she told me so in a PM) confessed that she secretly wanted to have Thaddeus's babies (also confessed in the same PM). So your predicted uprising would never happen.Also, the blatant forgery of a PM to incriminate Thaddeus is quite obvious. If Thaddeus really didn't like you, you would be a smoldering pile of ashes that would be crushed underneath his mighty cannon shots. The fact that you are still alive proves that this is a blatantly false accusation.I do not deny that the "My Little Kony" picture was quite attractive, but nothing is more attractive than a sky pirate with a british accent. A poll recently taken suggests that 98% of people, male and female, have sexual fantasies about getting it on with a sky pirate with a british accent, thus making Thaddeus a far more attractive option than Nony.While Kony may be tall, dark, and handsome, Thaddeus is dark (blatantly true), handsome (he's obviously quite attractive), and British. The British outweighs the tallness (who really wants to be with a 8ft tall guy compared to a british sky pirate? Yeah, thought so), so Thaddeus is still sexier.So, in summary of what has transpired here today, I shall sum up the round with the reasons why you are going to support Thaddeus for Supreme Commander of Earth:1. He's british.2. He's a sky pirate.3. He's amazing.4. He's british.5. He's more attractive than Kony.6. He's british.7. Sarah Palin will fall in love with you if you go against Thaddeus (and no one wants that).8. Chuck Norris will kill you if you go against Thaddeus (almost the worst one, but Sarah Palin just barely tops this).9. Thaddeus is british.So, for the above reasons, I support Thaddeus for 2016 Supreme Commander of Earth.
We should elect Joseph Kony as Supreme Commander of Earth.

I accidentally made it three rounds instead of four, so I apologies for that. This will be my last argument. My opponent claims that the anarchy that follows would be a good thing, when in reality, it would make DDO horrible. If DDO had its sexy orgy, the STDs that follow would be outstanding! I won't name any names, but quite a few of these people have admitted to me that they have aids! With Thad as commander, he would surely have thousands of women for himself. After participating in the Debate. orgy, he would be spreading mass destruction to all the beautiful women. He'd also pass a law stating that he gets any woman he wants, whether she is yours or not! And could you imagine how irritating the Debate. orgy would be? All those feminists in one place? Blah. There would be an uprising against Thad. Joseph Kony on the other hand, would have order. He loves guns more than women, and that is somebody we need. LRA AKA NRA. But let's move on. Moving to my opponent's next point, random attacks are bad when you are the subject to the attacks. I cannot tell you how many times he has threatened me. He can have a hot temper at times. Please review this hateful PM I took from him. . http://i42.tinypic.com... (1) I have informed the owner of juggle and he is in the process of banning him for his hate crimes. My opponent believes that just because Thaddeus has a British accent he is sexy. He may not have been able to the the pictures, but can you honestly tell me that the "My Little Kony" wasn't hot? It's super sexy (hand check. ) Kony is tall, dark, and handsome. Three of three. Thaddeus is only two of those thing, handsome and dark (we all suspect. ) (2) This is not a matter of who deserves to be commander. If that were the case of all elections the results would be much different. No my friends, this is a case of what's best for all of us. Would you want a crazy British fellow showing off to the lady folk with his mighty nukes? Would you like to live out your life in fear, praying that Thaddeus won't come and steal your wife? He may be good for the first few months, but after he experiences his mad power trip we are toast. I would like to keep this debate readable, so I shall end here. I thank my opponent and audience for reading. Sources: (1). . http://shark-tank.net... (2). . http://i42.tinypic.com...
We should elect Joseph Kony as Supreme Commander of Earth.

My opponent's entire claim is entirely false. While Joseph Kony, as I will concede, is a swell guy, there's nothing he can do to compete against a fvcking Sky Pirate.Thus, I will negate the resolution and instead posit that the DDO user known as Thaddeus, or more commonly known as Thaddeus River, the Sky Pirate, should become Supreme Commander of the Earth.I await my opponent's arguments.Sources:1. http://www.debate.org...
We should elect Joseph Kony as Supreme Commander of Earth.

I'm not busy this week, so I have time for a simple debate. Please be quick in your responses if you can. If you are on the internet, chances are that you've heard about Joseph Kony. This good fellow is supposedly capturing kids and forcing them to be in his "army." This debate is simple, we should make Joseph Kony Supreme Commander of Earth. The first round is just for acceptance. Sources: 1. http://news.discovery.com...
It"s time to crackdown on cash-point cretins

Under the following link (http://www.debate.org...) most voters will be delighted to see that since it says "No use of profanities or swear words." under Codes of conduct I will automatically be winning the conduct vote if I were to not use any profanities in my debate.As for sources, personal anecdote is hardly a valid source.I shall now rebut your round one argument."We I've all been there on Saturday night, standing patiently in line to withdraw some beer vouchers from the hole in the wall while some mental[sic he misses the -ly] defective stares blankly at the screen, occasionally pressing buttons, seemingly at random."As you can see, this is a pointless introduction to his debate, merely meant to hook you in to assume you've experienced the same anecdote that he has and then to use this as valid objective evidence."what is wrong with these morons?" They are 'mentally defective' as you say. This is by no fault of their own."I mean, what's so difficult about withdrawing cash from an ATM?" Well, clearly the difficulty isn't there for you only for the 'mentally defective'."I say it's about time the banks got tough with these cash machine menaces 'mentally defective individuals." Baseless opinion. " This is my idea: when users take too long over five seconds between pressing buttons, say over 5 seconds, certain messages should would flash up. To begin with, the messages should would be gently encouraging prompts, such as:"Hurry up!" (In what way is this a 'gently encouraging prompt'?) and "Come on, come on, other people want to use this machine as well you know." What if there's no one behind them?Then if the delays continues, a more forthright message should would flash up:"You seem to be taking an extraordinarily long time completing your transaction, what's wrong with you? Are you monged out of your head on drugs or are you just a complete fvcking retard? Press either:" Totally irrelevant, rude and unnecessary.A - Sorry, I spent all day on lying on the couch in my underwear eating cold pizza and smoking crack and I'm not thinking straight, just give me a 20 seconds while I get my fvcking sh!t together dude." Again, totally unnecessary additions."Or:"B - Actually, as it happens, I do have profound learning difficulties, thank you very much, and consequently my responses may be somewhat protracted compared to those of so-called 'normal people' but I can assure you I'm doing my best." How do you ensure people in the predicament of A will not pick B?"The machine should" ustifications given...None."Right, that's it, you were warned, you were FVCKING warned. Clearly you don't give a flying FVCK about our valued customers waiting behind you, so we're keeping your card to teach you a lesson. You can have it back when you can prove to us that you are fit person to use a bank card and not before. Now FVCK OFF out of everybody's way."You are suggesting taking cards and forcing people to 'prove themselves' without giving the card back with which to prove themselves.
It"s time to crackdown on cash-point cretins

We've all been there on Saturday night, standing patiently in line to withdraw some beer vouchers from the hole in the wall while some mental defective stares blankly at the screen, occasionally pressing buttons, seemingly at random. Jesus Christ on a fvcking bike, what is wrong with these morons? I mean, what's so difficult about withdrawing cash from an ATM? I say it's about time the banks got tough with these cash machine menaces. This is my idea: when users take too long between pressing buttons, say over 5 seconds, certain messages should flash up. To begin with, the messages should be gently encouraging prompts, such as: "Hurry up!" and "Come on, come on, other people want to use this machine as well you know." Then if the delays continue, a more forthright message should flash up: "You seem to be taking an extraordinarily long time completing your transaction, what's wrong with you? Are you monged out of your head on drugs or are you just a complete fvcking retard? Press either: A - Sorry, I spent all day on lying on the couch in my underwear eating cold pizza and smoking crack and I'm not thinking straight, just give me a second while I get my fvcking sh!t together dude.' Or: B - Actually, as it happens, I do have profound learning difficulties, thank you very much, and consequently my responses may be somewhat protracted compared to those of so-called 'normal people' but I can assure you I'm doing my best." The machine should then either allow 20 seconds for the transaction to completed in the case of the first response, or 30 seconds in the case of the second response, and if this time elapses without the cash being withdrawn the following message should appear: "Right, that's it, you were warned, you were FVCKING warned. Clearly you don't give a flying FVCK about our valued customers waiting behind you, so we're keeping your card to teach you a lesson. You can have it back when you can prove to us that you are fit person to use a bank card and not before. Now FVCK OFF out of everybody's way." This would send the message to those inconsiderate people that unnecessarily delaying other cash-point users is not acceptable such behaviour will not be tolerated. Thank you.