Top android smartphones have better hardware than the iphone 5

It must be noted that since the BOP falls on the Pro any argument that is not expressly in their favor must be counted as a loss. Furthermore basic debate etiquette dictates that new arguments offered following constructive speeches must be discounted. With this in mind, I will refute, Better- I urge the voters to reject this logic. My opponent never offers this in his constructive thus my logic must be preferred. Furthermore, yes a Prius is a better car than a Bugatti Veryon in terms of gas mileage but also in terms of price and maintenance. For a family conscious of price this would be a better option, so my logic still stands. Operating System- My opponent outright ignores my logic that the software of any program is what gives value to the hardware. Hardware cannot operate without Software thus one must consider the software. Furthermore this limitation was only made following the first round and in an underview at that. Benchmark Scores- I ask that my opponent's conduct here be noted. Next I ask that the voters be mindful of the fact that the iPhone5 still outperforms the GN2 in two crucial areas comparison on the GeekBench Benchmark. Regardless of which of the two images one chooses to look at in the aforementioned link, the iPone5 outperforms the GN2 in terms of streaming and memory. Overclocking- my opponent claims that the purpose of overclocking justifies it as a measurement of superiority; however this does not refute the fact that it is not something the phone can do on it's own. Software (which my opponent interestingly enough claims is irrelevant) is needed to achieve this. Bigger Screen- The resolution of a scree depend in part on it's size, so this argument is still mute. Furthermore I now realize (by my opponent's own admission) that this bigger screen argument is an ergonomic argument. Therefore it is fundamentally irrelevant. Ram- My opponent never refutes that the GN2 only has more technology, not better technology. In fact he openly admits that the iPhone5 has faster ram for things such as streaming (something was refuting only moments ago). Do not allow my opponent to change the nature of his argument in a rebuttal speech, this includes discounting the Geekbench Benchmark scale of measurement. The source my opponent links legitimize His argument[12], that faster Ram is pointless, is mute as it's still a case of quantity instead of quality. [12] . http://www.tomshardware.com... Be logical about this guys, if I handed you 2 McDoubles and claimed it was better than a single Bloomin' Burger from Outback[13], you would know that's not true; Quantity does not equate Quality. [13] . http://www.outback.com... Battery- My opponent has missed the point of my argument, the ability that an accessory adds to a product isn't an indicator of the product's quality. Accordingly the removable battery is not a reason to believe that the GN2 has better hardware. Also it is not my burden to show how the GN2's batter can be improved. The aforementioned article was provided to show that Pro's original 8-hour battery life argument was false. This argument is ultimately another issue of quantity being misinterpreted as quality. 2 Apps at once- Moving on then. Quad Core vs. Dual Core- This is huge drop, and again an issue of Quantity being misinterpreted as Quality. The fact that the GN2 requires 4 cores while the iPhone5 only requires 2 is an indicator that the iPhone5 has better technology. Again, if I claimed two that McDoubles were better than a single Bloomin Burger, you would know that was false. The quantity of a given technology does not indicate the quality of said technology. Memory- As my opponent has shown in the prior round this claim of better memory stems from the fact that the GN2 has more memory programmed into the phone, not a better usage of memory. Despite having 128gb of memory compared to the iPhone5's 64gb, the iPhone5 still manages to outperform the GN2 in memory speed. Near Field Communication (NFC)- This is a new argument. I am under no burden to respond to it. The S-Pen- Not only is this a new argument, but it's one of the ergonomic arguments my opponent and I agree is irrelevant. In conclusion Pro fails to provide a compelling argument as to why the hardware of the GN2 is intrinsically better than the Hardware of the iPhone5. He consistently changes the nature of his arguments throughout this debate as well as does he make the false claim that more technology means the technology is better. The GN2 has more technology in it than the iPhone 5, but the quality of the technology isn't any better; the iPhone5 operates better and is built better.