Nazism was needed.

"Germany in 1930. Here my opponent claims that Nazism was necessary to help the common worker out of poverty. However, There were alternative ideologies that could have done this as well. An example is Capitalism, Which enabled the individual to lift themselves out of poverty. This is being tested worldwide in many countries and they are experiencing high economic growth rates because of it. " Yet it was Capaitalism itself that helped Germany into the depression. Along with the treaty of Versaillies, They had to pay reperations, And giving up land was a big blow. When the stock markets crashed in the United States, It furthered the descent into Germany. Germany also tried it's best to trade and sell, Yet the protective tariffs of the countrys denied Germany to pay. Hitler way of economics was proven to help Germany bring back from the Depression. We can make assumptions about which System could of helped Germany, But in the end, Hitlers Nazism helped Germany get brough back from the depression. I also argue how is an indivdiual suppose to lift them out of poverty when 6 million Germans were unemployed? My opponenet makes a claim that a country focuses more on innovation when not in a war. My opponent also makes a claim saying Iphone and better versions of computers came from when there was peace. However, Wars drive technological imporvment. First off we wouldn't have better versions of computer if we didn't have the first computer, Which was made in World War 2. War and Peace go hand and hand. We can't have one without the other to keep us Humans technologically advance. Yeah I linked the source to the animal law conservation. My opponenet makes a claim that a few endagnered species would not die. Unfourantly my opponeent is wrong. The ecosystem was in trouble when the Dodo was extinct, Because the Dodo ate the fruit of a tree, When it goes through the dodo birds digestive system, It allowed it to activate and grow. Without the Dodo's those trees would also go extinct, Making the ecosystem even worse. My opponeents claim that endagered species dying won't change much, However it does. The 1st freeway system was created in the US in 1908 (https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Controlled-access_highway) The Germans made their 1st freeway system in 1932, 24 years after the Americans. Ah I was talking about the Autobahn, I apologize, I meant it as the first of it's kind in the freeway system. "Not inherently. If the Natzis did not create rockets, Then some other country probably would have done something similar. The space race probably would have still taken place assuming WWII didn"t create 2 world powers. Also, 1 guy on the moon does not justify 17 million people dead from the Holocaust(Niewyk, Donald L. ; Nicosia, Francis R. (2000). The Columbia Guide to the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-11200-9. ). " I ask Con, Can he prove that a country would probaly do something similar? He is throwing probabilities, And might of's without proving it could. He also says 1 guy on the moon does not justifty 17 million dead. I never said this is a justifcation, I am saying without the Nazi's multiple things wouldn't come from the world. My opponent than throws saying that the Germans created a lot of inventions it did not justify the number of dead. We are not justifying the Nazis. My opponenet than says if Germany was capitalist during WWII it could of made those things faster. I ask Con, How is Germany suppose to get through it, If they are suffering from a economic depression, Unable to pay the dues from the treaty, And the unemployment rate. He keeps throwing capaitalism. In the end, It wasn't capaitilism that brought back countries from depression, But rather public works, And public spending to stimulate the economy. Germany can't be capaitilistic and make the same inventions if there wasn't workers, And a non-stimulant economy to work with. In the end, It's not about the justfication, It's about wether if it was needed. Con threw around what if scenarios, Asking if Germany was Captailistic they could of done the same thing, Without taking in consideration of Geramnys current financial, And economic crisis, That Hitler was proven to restore, And help. War and Peace created technological advancements, And without a big war to help advance the Technologies, We wouldn't have the technologies today to help with the problems we are solving right now. I ask to vote pro, Get pass the bias of Nazi Germany, And admit that they were a nesscary evil to help expand the Human race into greatness. http://www. History. Ucsb. Edu/faculty/marcuse/classes/33d/projects/1920s/Econ20s. Htmhttp://www. Bagheera. Com/inthewild/ext_dodobird. Htm