Abortion Should Be Legal

Thanks for your arguments. I'll post mineObservationsO1: My opponent doesn't post anything about the BoP, so I assume that BoP is sharedO2: My opponent doesn't post anything on the questions, so I assume that if I answered all the questions I win. And I did answer all of them, so vote Con.O3: My opponent drops my framework, therefore voters must buy my framework, as I am the only one with a framework.DefenseMy opponent concedes that the fetus is alive, then that automatically means my Right of Life argument and the fetus is alive argument is automatically conceded, so vote for Con just for the Right of Life argument. Because of this argument, Pro concedes that humans do not have the right to live.My opponent says that I neglect the fact that pregnancy is not easy. My opponent makes a bare assertion that pregnancy is not easy, and makes no source, this argument is invalid. And even if it is not easy, almost nothing is easy, and we shouldn't just always do the easy thing, because in this case it is killing, as my opponent drops my right of life argument.My opponent says that my argument about DNA is a fallacy. My opponent doesn't show why it is a fallacy, so my opponent's claim is wrong. Pro makes a false assertion that is a stranger, but I showed that you child is part of your DNA, and my opponent says it is false, but doesn't show why, so my opponent's rebuttal is false.My opponent asks, "Why adopt a kid, it is not my blood?" This doesn't really make sense, but I'll try understaniding it. By asking this question, my opponent concedes the DNA argument, because he says, "not my blood." Why do we do anything? Some people might want to adopt children, like some people who want children, and they have reasons. Around 135,000 children are adopted each year [1], so there will be many reasons for each of them. My opponent says that it is awful, and foster kids often have the worst lives possible. My opponent makes a bare assertion again, so voters cannot buy this argument. My opponent doesn't say why it is awful. It is certainly better than killing, as killing is said immoral.Missbailey says this in this debate, ""We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." [2] According to The Declaration of Independence, we are born with unalienable rights and we must secure these rights. One of those rights happen to be life. The Government shouldn't be able to take life through capital punishment as unalienable rights may not be taken away. [3]"Source: http://www.debate.org...This argument clearly shows that murder is immoral, and adoptation is moral, as it invovles no killing, and moral is automatically better than immoral, murdering is more awful then adoptation.Pro says that the mother will think for nine months that she has no right for her body. She does have rights, but not the right to kill, because the fetus in the mother's belly has rights too, like the right of life. My opponent provides a bare assertion, so anyways, there is no reason to by this claim.My opponent basically says that adoptation is bad because we miss school, and that will ruin your life. My opponent doesn't say why you miss school. Of course some adopted kids can go to school, and you can get homeschooled also. This is a bare assertion from my opponent too. My opponent doesn't say how this is ruining lives. Abortion is not acceptable because all humans have the right of life, and killing is immoral. Therefore, vote Con. My opponent says that his arguments prove that it is not immoral. I rebutted them, and he has no weight.ConclusionMy opponent doesn't rebut my arguments at all. Extend them. He drops that the fetus is alive, and the right of life argument. I rebutted all of my opponent's arguments, and all of my opponent's arguments are bare assertion. Voters have no choice but to vote Con, as voters cannot buy my opponent's claims because they are all bare assertions. Therefore, vote Con. I extend my arguments.Sources[1] http://www.pbs.org...[2] http://www.archives.gov...[3] http://www.dictionary.com...I couldn't get permission from MB8 to post her argument, but she normally allows it, and she deactivated so I did it. Anyways I posted quotes, and wrote it was from MB8. I thank her for that. Please vote Con!!!!!!