Multi-Culturism

"Yes, you are right, it isn't not coincidental. If you read my argument, it clearly says that these nations are multi cultural because they are accepting of other cultures, non-hostile to other cultures and have a stable economy as to attract other cultures." .....Thanks for Agreeing with me? I pointed out how there's a Connection between Multi-Culturalism, Peace, and Economic stability. Alright. "Notice in your list of places where multiculturalism was RESTRICTED and OPPOSED, multiculturism was not ABSENT, only RESTRICTED and OPPOSED. If multi-culturism was not present in these situations there would be no other cultures to RESTRICT and OPPOSES . If there were no Jews in Nazi-Germany then there would be no Jews to exterminate. These situation you have supplied us are just more examples of multi-culturism's destructiveness. I find it funny you mentioned the religion thing because if you read the entirety of my argument, I used the religion example to support my argument." This is the Xenophobic thinking that leads to Blind ignorance and Racism. You cannot remove Other Races or Cultures simply to Prevent war and Problems, Removing them would actually cause problems! "If there were no Jews in Nazi-Germany then there would be no Jews to exterminate" "You know, you're absolutely right! If there were no Jews, none would've died. But there were unfortunately, and 3 Million were murdered. "These situation you have supplied us are just more examples of multi-culturism's destructiveness" That Statement shoots Red Flags through me. No, Multi-Culturism is not the Cause of this insurrection, but the Victim. Evil men and Governments arise, and Attempt to construct a "Utopia" in their own view. This is what you're saying. The Holocaust wasn't the Nazi's fault, it was the Jews, because if they weren't there they wouldn't have been killed. The Cambodian Genocide wasn't Pol Pot's fault, it was the Cambodian Population because if they weren't there they wouldn't have been killed. The Abuse and Oppression imposed on the North Korean people isn't the Government fault, it's the North Korea peoples because if they weren't there, they wouldn't be under those conditions. Solid Argument, Con. "I find it funny you mentioned the religion thing because if you read the entirety of my argument, I used the religion example to support my argument." I also Find it Humourous, Considering that your Only example to why your against Multi-Culturalism. " Yes, thank you for providing me with this extra fire-power" Your Welcome, are you Going to Refute them or just act Sarcastic? " Actually if you read my argument I did provide refute your argument, you just " brushed off everything I said." To the part about me not having enough evidence I say: 1. I did make new points in my second argument. Did you not read the part about religious wars. Before refuting my argument it would probably help you if you read my arguments. 2. I should't have to make any new points now that you've explained why multi-culturalism is harmful to society for me." Religion is a Small part of Culture, and not a reason to Say Multi-culturism is terrible. Even then, I'd argue for the Great things Religion has done, Even through the Evil that has arose from it. "2. I should't have to make any new points now that you've explained why multi-culturalism is harmful to society for me." Ok, Thank you for Conceding. You don't have use Ad Hominem and Sarcasm to do so, However. "In conclusion, my opponent "brushed" my arguments off then accused me off "brushing his arguments off." Thank you for the Intellectually stimulating and Challenging debate. As of now you've Conceded all My Contentions from the First round, and my examples of how Combatting Multi-culturism has been unsuccessful and a Tragedy. I've Refuted your one Reason to why it's bad, and have been awaiting new arguments from the First round. New Contentions, Con. Debate is not simply Refutation.