Holocaust happened

Pro's numbers add up to less than 1 million, but he must prove 6 million. "If the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result […] [will be] the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe." - Hitler Leading expert on the Holocaust, Hans Mommsen(1), says this was merely propaganda and not indicative of genocidal intent(2), and Mommsen isn't even a Holocaust Denier. "[T]he war can only end with the destruction of the Germanic peoples or the disappearance of Jewry from Europe." "Instead, the result of this war will be the destruction of Jewry. For the first time others will not bleed alone. For the first time the genuine old Jewish law will be applied: "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth!" - Hitler The first quote refers to forced emigration. The second refers to the destruction of the Jewish grip on the media, which Hitler intends to combat with anti-Jew propaganda. In fact, he was very successful with this approach in Germany, and is here revealing he will employ the same tactic throughout the rest of Europe. Just because Hitler employed violent language in this declaration, like "others will not bleed alone," and, "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth!" doesn't mean he wanted genoide. As tempting as it is to take the statements literally, that is only due to our deeply entrenched prejudice. The facts of history prove they were merely metaphors for the annihilation of the Jewish influence, not Jewish race. Refer back to the Nazi memo circulated among top Nazi officials well into the war-- after this scathing speech-- which confirms Hitler's only plan for the Jews was expulsion.The Jäger Report purports to record the massacre of 136,421 Jews at the hands of Nazis. It purports to be a copy of the original, but it's just a typewritten paper bearing no signature (much less Jäger's signature) and anybody could have typed this up, especially the Soviets who claim to have 'discovered' it over a decade after the war's end. It was alleged to have been 'found' so late that its existence was not even known at the Nuremburg Trials.There is no reason to trust the Soviets who published this document, and every reason to consider them liars and fraudsters. They massacred 22,000 Polish(4) in cold blood during WWII, blaming it on the Nazis. This hoax was upheld for 40 years until they finally fessed up in 1990.(3) This Jäger Report is just another instance of Soviet fraud.Himmler's report is on anti-partisan measures taken. Jews were executed if they were partisans. This was completely legal, since partisan Jews, fighting in civilian garb, were war criminals guilty of perfidy under the Geneva Convention.Here's the correct translation of Himmler's speech, which says nothing about exterminating Jews: "I am thinking now of the evacuation of the Jews, the uprooting of the Jewish people. It is one of those things that's easy to say: "The Jewish people will be uprooted" , says every Party comrade, "that's quite clear, it's in our programme: elimination of the Jews, extirpation; that's what we're doing." ... The riches they had, we've taken away from them. I have given a strict order ... that these riches shall, of course, be diverted to the Reich without exception ... he who takes even one mark of it, that's his death. A number of SS men ... have violated that order, and that will be their death, without mercy. We had the moral right, we had the duty to our own people, to kill this people which wanted to kill us."(5) Pro's deceitful quote-mining and incorrect translation gave the false impression that Himmler, in speaking of the "people which wanted to kill," were Jews. It was actually thieving, disobedient Nazis, portrayed as wanting to kill the German people (hyperbole).Höss' confessions were obtained via torture and not submissable as evidence. They also manifest absurdities that prove their false character, such as the reference to a non-existent concentration camp (Wolzek) and suspicious mispellings ("Tublinka" instead of "Treblinka"). Some of them weren't even written in his own language (!).Stark's testimony is just so stupid, frankly, that it cannot be believed. Stark said the Nazis executed Jews by hiding a rifle behind their back and telling them, "Look over there,"(7) then immediately shooting them behind the neck. Once again, we are required to believe the Jews are complete idiots in order to accept the Holocaust legend as fact. There's no way anyone with a room-temperature IQ is going to fall for this prank. The Nazis would have come up with a more efficient killing process if their true intent was to systematically slaughter Jews.Even more rediculous is Stark's testimony that "10 to 15 minutes" after gassing of the Jews commenced, the doors were opened and Nazis retrieved the bodies inside. The Zyklon B insecticide would have still been releasing its lethal load of cyanide gas; it does so for hours. Any Nazi that dared open the door in 15 minutes would have poisoned himself, assuming he wasn't dead already from cyanide gas escaping the non-airtight chambers. Based on his own careful on-site examination, chemist Dr. Lindsey, declared under oath: "[N]o one was willfully or purposefully killed with Zyklon B ... absolutely impossible."(8)Leuchter, America's number one gas-chamber expert, declared: "After reviewing all of the material and inspecting all of the sites at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek ... there were no execution gas chambers at any of these locations ... the alleged gas chambers at the inspected sites could not have then been, or now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution gas chambers."(9) Pro's photos of typhus and dysentry-infected corpses being burnt; i.e. properly disposed of, are hardly evidence of any wrongdoing, much less murder.Bahr's testimony is a comment about 25 Jews, not 6,000,000.The shoe argument is another Soviet lie. They weren't taken from murder victims. They came from the nearby shoe factory.(10) “The rest of the Jews ... would be liquidated, which means either transported eastward in cattle trucks to an unknown destination, or killed where they stood” - The London Times, December 4th, 1942 "the Jews ... are now being evacuated eastward ... On the whole it can be said that about 60 per cent of them will have to be liquidated whereas only about 40 per cent can be used for forced labor." - Goebbels He is saying 60% will be evacuated to the east while only 40% can stay to work for the Nazis.Pro shows a map which he uses to support his claim Hitler 'deported' Europe's Jews into Germany. Not only is this nonsensical claim utterly absurd, false, and without basis in fact, but his image is of such low quality that it's difficult or impossible to make out the legend/key.Pro gives us two photos of crematoria containing bodies. Since the purpose of a crematorium is to burn bodies, there's nothing sinister about that. The Nazis should be applauded for properly disposing of disease-ridden corpses in this manner. There were indeed mass graves in the Nazi concentration camps; many people died of typhus, as I find myself repeating far too often. None of Pro's photos show more than maybe ten or twenty corpses, yet you must prove first that 6,000,000 were killed, and second, that they were all Jews and it was the Nazis who done it."Hitler gives very important commands verbally at times. If a written order was not extracted, it wouldn't diminish the legitimacy of the argument." - ProIt definitely does hurt your case that no written order exists for the murder of Jews. None from Hitler, none from any Nazi, none from nobody. The pathetic argument that this is so because Hitler was fond of verbal orders is just an excuse.I didn't say Churchill never mentioned the Holocaust. What I said was he never wrote about "genocide of Jews or homocidal gas chambers" in his memoirs. I appreciate Pro's concession that genocidal intent is not shown in Hitler's Mein Kamf.Pro says, "Treblinka used carbon monoxide," but his citation takes me to an irrelevant Wiki page.Pro argues there were two types of gas chambers at Auschwitz; one for gassing lice, and one for gassing Jews. First, I will remind the voters that I have expert testimony on my side from a person who actually designed and built Missouri's gas chamber that concludes no human gassing could or did take place at the Nazi concentration camps; The only authority Pro calls to his defense is RationalWiki. Second, Pro argues less Zyklon B is needed to kill people than lice, which is why the lice chambers are stained blue but not the Jew chambers. An obvious question that arises is how does he know the Jew chambers weren't stained blue, since according to Pro, the Nazis destroyed them? And if the Jew chambers weren't stained blue because they were ventilated, then how did sufficient gas build up to kill the Jews? Also, what were the Nazis doing delousing clothes for Jews, when they intended to kill them anyway?(1) https://en.wikipedia.org...(2) http://www.jstor.org...(3) http://www.history.com...(4) https://en.wikipedia.org...(5) http://codoh.com... (minor edits by myself)(6) http://codoh.com...(7) http://codoh.com...(8) The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Feb. 12, 1985, p. M3.(9) http://www.ihr.org...(10) http://vho.org... p.17