Debate.org has some serious problems, ladies and gentlemen.

So to begin my speech I will list the explicit rules for posting of debate.org in the ToS: 1. No use of profanities or swear words. 2. No personal attacks against other members or a member's opinions. 3. No use of racial, sexual or religious slurs. 4. No threats or implications thereof. And thus abiding by those rules I will disprove all of my opponents opinions. "If a user criticizes the webmaster, creator, or anyone affiliated with the website for the way it is run and the rediculous practices employed by said people involved with this site, the comment is immediately deleted, and the user's account is deleted." >>I think this site could be much better than it is currently being run and have made my thoughts clear to the webmaster on multiple occasions. In fact I criticize the fact that the webmaster does not participate in real debates as I think it would be fun. Sadly my critiques of this site haven't resulted in my comments being banned or my account being deleted as my opponent seems to suspect. Instead they have resulted in messages from the Webmaster informing me that my ideas have been taken into consideration for the next update. Which I hear will be coming out soon. "This isn't a rumor, or a vendetta against anyone; it is an absolute fact. The people who run this site want you to debate certain things, by their rules. If you want to debate something even slightly controversial, outside of their conservative parameters, your account is immediatley deleted. If you bring up religion in a negative light, criticize a group (particularly a conservative group), discuss sex, even in responsible ways, your account is deleted and comments erased." >>My debates disprove this entire thought. I have debated both sides of multiple issues. I have gone conspiracy theory on 9/11, fought the Christian church twice, turned around and supported theistic satanism, advocated that we distribute AK-47's in order to maintain population control, turned around and advocated myself as an idiot, supported communism twice, argued that 1 does not actually equal 1, argued for cigarettes and guns being illegal, argued pro abortion and flag burning. Please point me to the conservative part of those debates.... furthermore, looks at some of the current debates in voting period: http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... uhhh.....? By the way here are a couple points which I added onto a comment section for my opponent to read, but they might as well apply here. "1. HoosierPapi completely and utterly dropped Logical-Master's point that there are debates that criticize this cite or even the webmaster personally but have remained. To extend this point I would like to bring in the ToS and ask HoosierPapi to demonstrate one user who has been wrongly banned from this site under those rules. 2. This site has 3872 members, as of latest count. The fact that 20 of those members, or perhaps former members, have voiced a dislike of this site speaks little. That actually breaks down to 1/2 of a percent. Even if I wanted to be extremely liberal and say that double that many people are dissatisfied with this site and only 1000 users actually use it, I would still be standing at 4%. 3. This site is not mandatory in the least! What is you complaining about it going to do? You have alternatives: a. Make your own site. b. Submit comments on how to make the site better into the comment box. c. Do real life debate. d. Do something you actually like to do while online. Again I ask, what does posting this here do? If the status quo is indeed how you present it to be then what is complaining to a conservative webmaster going to do? Nothing for you doubtlessly, nothing for me, nothing for the webmaster." I stand by all questions asked in this quote, as it was written by me in the first place on this debate's comment section, http://www.debate.org... I would also ask that my opponent provide links to all of these discussion groups and the 20 or so persons that have complained so that we have proof they exist. Finally a quote from my opponent, "If you do not play by the conservative ideals & avoid criticizing the people who run this site, even constructively, you get deleted and comments get censured, like a those in a communist nation." Please notice the word conservative coupled with the word communist. Thanks. =)