Muhammad(pbuh) is mention in the Bible

I am not sure if my opponent has even read my arguments last round, as I showed why the prophet could not have been Muhammad. I assume that my opponent has fully dropped the prophecy from Deuteronomy, as he has failed to address any of my arguments. I am completely fine with my opponent drawing out different prophecies each round if he so chooses, as his burden of proof merely requires him to prove Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible, not that he is mentioned in any particular prophecy, I would just like to call attention to the fact that he has so far failed to respond to any of my arguments, and it would be rather nice if he could. My opponent did not specify in the beginning which edition of the bible we ought to use, and since I did I will use the Biblia Sacra Vulgata (John 14:16) "(16) et ego rogabo Patrem, et alium Paraclitum dabit vobis, ut maneat vobiscum in aeternum" First off, the prophecy of Jesus is never linked to the Deuteronomical prophecy by my opponent, so I do not see how my opponent can make the claim he does. Obviously Jesus was not prophesying himself, that does not preclude that prophecy relating to him. My opponent has made a very novel argument regarding the Bible and these "ancient manuscripts". However, I remain unimpressed (and also a tad suspicious that he is copying/pasting his arguments from some other source). For now, I will accept his dubious claims (although there exist manuscripts that do say "Holy Spirit" that were written before the one my opponent uses to make these claims), and move onward to the rest of his arguments. 1.Jesus said the parakletos is a human being No he didn't. I'm not sure exactly what part of John 16:13 my opponent is quoting, but it clearly says "He will speak", not "He will be a human being". That is like saying because in the Old Testament it was said that God spoke to Moses, God must be a human being. Even if the Holy Spirit was present before Jesus and his ministry, that does not mean that it cannot be the Holy Spirit. It merely means the Holy Spirit will only come if Jesus leaves. All that aside, this does not mean it is Muhammad. The Holy Spirit is also referred to with the masculine pronoun in other Biblical passages. I refer readers to Hebrews 10:15 as well as Romans 8:26. 2.Jesus is called a parakletos I'm sure that there must be some sort of fallacy here. Just because Jesus is described as a parakletos does not necessitate that parakletoses (parakletosi? I don't know Greek) be physical and human. Also, Jesus was not human. 3.The Divinity of Jesus a later innovation It could have been true even if it was not accepted for some time. I will not spend a great deal of time handling this because even if my opponent proves it true it does absolutely nothing for affirming the resolution. 4.Jesus prayed to God for another parakletos Yes. My opponent has not provided any connection between this and the resolution. I concede that Jesus prayed to God for another parakletos. I assert that it was the Holy Spirit. Let me throw out just a few counter-contentions here... A. In aeternum Muhammad died. In order for something to "ut maneat vobiscum in aeternum", it would have to be something that never ends. It makes more sense for this to be the Holy Spirit, because no human has ever lived forever. Regardless, this is obviously not Muhammad, who died. B. Spirits dwell Spirits dwell in people (1 John 4:4, read 1 John 4:3 for context). People do not dwell in people. Muhammad was a person. Muhammad could not have dwelt in another person. Muhammad was not a spirit. The Holy Spirit could have dwelt in people. Muhammad was clearly not mentioned in either the Old or the New Testaments. I remind everyone that the resolution is "Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible". Therefore, I need not undertake any defense of to whom the prophecies do refer, as long as I demonstrate they do not refer to Muhammad. I note that my opponent has made no argument of substance in this round affirming the resolution. Recall that even in the unlikely case my opponent shows Christian theology false, he still does not uphold the resolution.