Creationism is simply wrong

I am fairly confused by a great deal of this argument. Nearly all of it is composed of quotes from the very scripture that I am saying is inaccurate. It is not reasonably possible to refute the claim of "Creationism is wrong" by saying "Here is what Creationism says." That would be like me saying, "To Kill a Mockingbird does not contain any allegories for perceiving higher dimensions." and you then copying and pasting the text of that work into the debate.One of the most obvious and egregious errors in your thought process centers around the fact that, on the one hand the Creationism states the universe was built just a few thousand years ago and that Creation took 6 days. On the other hand, you clearly seem to admit that the universe and earth are billions of years old and that each aspect of Creationism took place over a time period far longer than 6 days.But, let's go step-by-step:"Have you ever wondered before this theory was even formed, the book of genesis has a link to the big bang theory?" I don't think this sentence makes sense in English. You will have to clear that one up for me."We all know now at that time there was air and stuff like that which comes naturally." What is "stuff like that?" Regardless, I agree that air "comes naturally." That is the whole point. It didn't come from God, it came naturally and organically."What surprises me is this: 4.6 billion years ago the sun was invented as well. How is this linked?"I think every physicist who has ever lived would take issue with the declaration that the sun was "invented". Furthermore, why does it surprise you that the sun was formed within the same 10 million-year stretch as the earth? The Earth was quite literally formed from the sun...by accretion from the solar nebula, to be more precise (BBC, Nice model, Swedenborg, Kant, Laplace, etc.). Even if you choose not to believe the well-established fact that the Earth was formed from the sun, surely it makes sense that two bodies located so incredibly close together on the scale of the universe would have come into existence near the same time.You then go on to just list quotes from scripture for a purpose I don't think I understand. "4.28 BYA water started condensing into liquid form." This is false. Water formed on earth 4.6 billion years ago (National Geographic, Science Advances). Again, you go on to list quotes from scripture that I don't see the application of without sound arguments or context. https://ny.pbslearningmedia.org... In summary, I have shown the following: Almost the entirety of your current argument isn't an argument at all. Rather, it's a listing of quotes from scripture that in no way are connected to any of you arguments aside from simply stating how many years ago an event occurred and then pasting a relevant passage from the Bible that speaks to a somewhat, vaguely-similar event You tried to pose a question about a link between the book of Genesis and the Big Bang Theory that was not remotely intelligible, and as such could not be responded to You purport to be a believer in Creationism but then go on to provide a timeline of the history of the Earth that directly and explicitly contradicts the Creationist timeline You demonstrate a clear lack of understanding of physics and astronomy in questioning how it is that the Sun and Earth were formed around the same time (when in fact the Earth has been unquestionably proven to have formed Thanks!