All homosexuals should be grouped together and isolated in the Bermuda Triangle

"I think doing this would be in the homosexual community's best interests so therefore, why not? " I do not think doing this would be in the homosexual community's best interest, so why do it? I shall now number my counterarguments to match my opponent's stated arguments (with corresponding numbers) 1. Homosexuals may cope a lot of unwarranted crap from people in this country, but approximately three-fourths of Americans support gay rights, so therefore, more people in this country support homosexuals and do not berate them. This would make homosexuals feel more comfortable knowing that although they receive crap from some people, they do not receive crap from the majority, for they are more accepted by the majority. (Notice my opponent has stated "this country," so I assume he refers to America, which I am also referring to) All groups of people receive criticisms and critiques, but that does not mean they should be isolated in the Bermuda Triangle. Obama receives a lot of crap from people, but should he be isolated in the Bermuda Triangle? No. That is against human rights. Get the point? The rest of the argument that follows is irrelevant; although there are people "on here" (I assume this is a reference to this website) that do not like gays, there are still many others who support them "If homosexuals were all confined to one area, they would never be the victim of hatred based upon their sexuality. This is obviously very beneficial to the gay community. " If homosexuals were confined to one area, they would still be victims of hatred. People would openly make fun of them even more, for they figure they couldn't offend anyone now that all homosexuals were relocated. People would make crude remarks such as, "Man, we had to learn about triangles in geometry today. So I wouldn't get bored, I made the sides of the triangle look like gay penises touching each other, to look like what those gays are doing on the Bermuda Triangle. " Besides, transporting all homosexuals to the Bermuda Triangle would not be beneficial to the gay community. Hundreds of millions of people are gay, so isolating ALL of them to the Bermuda Triangle would cost them a lot of money, cause overpopulation, and lead to embarrassment from being forced to move because of sexual orientation. 2. This argument seems very subjective. Not all homosexuals believe the Bermuda Triangle is a nice place. Not all homosexuals like nice things. Since not all homosexuals think the Bermuda Triangle is nice, it would cause grievances and depression among various gays who would be isolated there, which would in fact hamper the gay community. Not all of the Bermuda Triangle is beautiful, so many homosexuals would be disgruntled and unfulfilled in life. They would not be given their constitutional right to have a pursuit of happiness, and since it does not go against the majority of the people, it takes away from fundamental human rights. There are many homosexuals who would choose not to live in the Bermuda Triangle. They would not find it paradise. By you subjectively calling it a "paradise" does not mean it is paradise, which in fact it is not. 3. This point is irrelevant. Some homosexuals do not enjoy water, it could be that most of them do not, for "liking" something is simply subjective. This is not even relevant to the topic at hand. "I hope I can change his ways. " What ways? My ways of wise judgement and acceptance? I would like to change your ways of ignorance. Argument refuted. I urge a Con vote.