Rape/Sexual Harassment does not exist!

Stating women do not know what they want, based on their actions is not to be bias, sexist or whatever; it's to be upfront and completely truthful. My opponent argues a woman will say " no " when she genuinely does not want sex, which is false. The treatment of consent in sexual cases reflect a position that a woman saying no to sex is not adequate. She must show the strong resistance she put up to confirm her lack of consent. This once again proves actions speak louder than words. Whether my opponent realize it or not,women mean the opposite of what they actually say when it comes to sex. Thus,a woman's no to sex is said to actually mean yes, making it difficult to ascertain non consent. This belief developed from the socialization of girls and women to be passive when it comes to sex and to refrain from behavior than shows that they are interested in sex in the same way as their male counterparts. Now onto the" rape case"provided above,which my opponent completely ignored ; The conduct of the " victim "herself indicates her willingness,there is no evidence that the " perpetrator " induced her by a ruse or deceit to join him in the room. Did she scream,as he was touching her thigh, did she scratch the accused? As I have already stated that a woman is expected to scream and fight if she does not genuinely consent,and if she does neither, it is argued that she consented . I'm now going to provide more reasons on why I state rape does not exist,relying on my version of rape provided in the 1st round. Due to the fact that rape cases are unbailable offense, women use it to unduly punish men. They make these cases after personal misunderstanding that is not even related to sex. This is because they are aware men would be detained and therefore use it to blackmail. Others scream rape to disguise infidelity,women in long term relationships who have consensual sex with another man, and then blow the rape whistle to cover their lack of loyalty . Others use it to cover promiscuity, others use it as a psychological ploy to garner sympathy. Teens caught red handed in shameful and disgraceful sexual act by parents,will put up an act by means of false cries, out of sense of shame, thoughts of bringing shame and humiliation to parents due to pregnancy,prompt teens to scream rape .. The aforementioned elements prove, more or less, rape is a lie,and this lie does more harm than good, a number of men have committed suicide due to these FALSE rape allegations made by vengeful girls and women who are assisted by an unfair justice system in the name of feminism .Victims of false rape claims become disheartened, discouraged,humiliated by lies told by women .The possibility of years in prison and the stigma associated with the claims, results in suicide contemplation and actions. In conclusion, my opponent complains I use personal experience as ammunition( which proves the points raised regarding women behavior is indeed facts, not a fictional story that I made up in my backyard),when he is in fact struggling to contain his emotions and feelings, he is so concerned with winning to such an extent that he's utterly forgotten the duty ordained to him to prove rape actually exits ,and used the latter round to canvass for votes. He further complains i've used more spaces as a desperate attempt to make my arguments appear longer,however, anyone with highly cognitive analytic prowess will realize length does not matter, what you say is what matters the most, regardless of how short/ long it may be,I'd advice my opponent to learn to make each word count and keep complaints in a minimum. Let the audience judge whose argument is stronger!