I"m Pro-choice, tell me why you aren"t

my argument is dependency on someone"s body to survive. you"re equating fetuses literally feeding off of a persons body in order to achieve personhood or exist to human-beings who are not reliant on someone"s body to exist. your comparison makes no sense. How did they not have enough time to get adopted? Pro-lifers make it seem as though the demand of people wanting children is so high that it makes zero logical sense that it should take 4 years to adopt the 400,000 in foster care, yet you think 600,000 babies could be adopted per year? if it takes 4 years to adopt the 400,000 kids in the system imagine in 10 years when there are 6million unwanted babies. It would take 30,000 years to adopt those children alone if there were 200,000 adoptions per year. adoption agencies aka foster care systems don"t make themselves look bad to get people to sympathize, they deliberately lie to meet quotas, as was showcased in the article i provided. i"m sorry that i didn"t provide a citation of the opioid epidemic and its effects on children, it has literally been declared a national public health emergency so I assumed you would know this. Please do not say people "recover from pain and it is often short term" as if it is a matter of fact. Foster care children have a greater risk of many mental problems: https://www.socsci.uci.edu... . Don"t just say people naturally toughen up and are stronger because of this when our suicide rate has increased 24%. https://www.cdc.gov... Consequences come from everything in life, if I got injured in an accident should I be not be treated because driving was a risk, even though I had insurance? How could women continue their education and job if they have complications in their pregnancy such as the ones I named? Are there 600,000 people annually who will finance the medical bills and all of their living expenses? No. If there were, it"s shameful that we have so many children waiting to be adopted in foster care. Maybe someone might have a higher chance of dying in some cities, but they have the choice of leaving those cities. If someone has a higher chance of dying from a surgery than they do not getting the surgery, they have the right to choose their safest option. If someone ran you over drunk driving, they don"t and should not be forced to give you their kidney. While they should pay your legal expenses and face the law for drunk driving, they still have bodily autonomy. Them making a mistake does not wave that right, not even for a person. A fetus is not a person, so this is not even an accurate comparison. I"m just stating that body autonomy is a basic right. I never mentioned pro life in all circumstances. I don"t care about what % of pro-lifers vs pro-choicers support abortions at each stage. My point was that 79% of people (period) support abortion under some cases, be it rape, incest or the mothers life at risk. which shows me that the majority of people understand that a fetus is not a person or equivalent to the woman. The rate of infants born to drugs is a direct result of drugs. I don"t even know where you were going with that statement Not everyone can get "insurance" or save money, many people are living paycheck to paycheck believe it or not. It is potentially a crime to accidentally shoot someone. It"s most certainly investigated & someone can easily be convicted of a crime based on "negligence" lets put these women through that to determine whether their miscarriage was "genuine" or not.The rate of miscarriage is 50%, there are approximately 5X more miscarriages than abortions. I don"t know why I should have to keep providing citations of evidence of things that are common knowledge regarding birth and life to someone who claims to be pro life but nonetheless: https://www.gstatic.com... forced abortions are still maintained in china: https://www.pop.org... , I already stated that stricter abortions laws do not reduce abortions and that countries with stricter abortion laws typically have higher abortion rates but you choose to decide that that"s not a good comparison. Right, you can monitor the way people have sex the same way you can monitor other laws. Again, this is like a dystopian novel. Keeping someone in jail for 5 weeks can cost roughly $16k per person, not to mention their legal fees. What husband are you referring to that will take the mothers child when she"s in jail or attempts abortion? You do realize that the majority of women who abort are unmarried? A lot of men convince the woman to abort and pay for the procedure. Banning abortion does not create a world relatively free from STDs nor abortion nor premarital sex, it does not protect a baby from suffering dystopia because fetuses are neither human-beings nor capable of suffering. I don"t care if pro-lifers get pregnant. that"s their choice and none of my business. I specifically said until pro-lifers carry MY (aka the fetus of those who don"t want to carry it and want an abortion) fetus in their own body, I will decide if I want to carry this fetus or not. The amount of money it would take to take care of these children in foster care or on welfare, combined with the legal costs and jail costs of persecuting women could easily go towards free birth control, giving foster children a better life, solving world hunger, but clearly you care more about fetuses than the actual human beings in this world. I"m glad your opinion doesn"t dictate my rights and my choice.