BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Rap battle

Is my opponenent even trying?I think he's slowly dyingGivin' less and less effortNo energy for a single retort You think I'm boring?You'll hear it when I'm roaringBitin' down on your legsCookin' em up with my breakfast eggsI don't even need to lift a fingerThis battle has no need to lingerSeeker's already done for Got nothin' in his core He can't even understand complex wordsCan't search it up, what a "nerd"*Your arguments are getting demolishedEntire rap getting abolishedWhile I'm still standin' here tall and strongReady to punch you all day long--Not that I have to, with my powerWith a snap of my fingers I'll make you cower*sarcasm
Rap battle

Mentally i put you down gently cuz this will end badly I'm a child molester cuz i'm rippin up the asian Stanley (1) Did you get the source? That's you tryna grow a plant cuz you tried so hard to spark some creativity when you can't You rant cuz your not as talented as those who use a slant What in the world is a hauteur? Your language is foreign Your raps are boring, i'm roarin' cuz it's pourin' You think you a real Santa Claus killa: silent night, deadly night When i look at ya pictures, we all know you sleep wit a night light Gotta lock the door, cover floorboards, time it just right But you can't even defend yourself right here on the spotlight your raps are so short they made Tu pac go to court Cuz you ruined the genre of hip hop now you need support What are you doin online? Your mom should saved your youth Right now, i'm demolishin' your self-esteem what i spit is the truth! I rap cuz i'm supposed to, fearless to whom i opposed to, you rap to who you posed to Baby boy! I'm evil, you a baby bird who flew got lost from his crew so learn panda kung fu Look at me i quoted a source, but mine was better than yours Get back to me with solid multis after you finished your chores 1. http://tmsimg.com...
Rap battle

I shake my head at my opponent's poor try--Reading the rap, I give a great sighTruth Seeker got no rhythm,His brain got no wisdomHe got lots of hauteur But I manipulate him like an auteurTo me he's just a puppetFlopping around like a muppetHe got no juice in the tankHis face is sheet blank Switching from 2 to 8 verses? Bad idea--the voters will be givin' you cursesI'll be the one blastin' the gunsPack you up between some hamburger bunsEat you up cooked with mustard--tonsThe wolves will be chasin' and you know you can't outrunYou had better pack your bagsYou'd gonna be so poor, wearin' ragsI can see your brain startin' to flagYou try to talk but you can only gag
Rap battle

My foe doesn't know what real rap is, the defintion of a real diss I'm like a venomous snake when i hiss, break your iron fist you communist I was expectin' to be respectin' someone who knows what he projectin' I'm injectin' vicious malicious blood into you like a virus every bone dissectin' I'm like the sheikh, blowin' yo cap back puttin' up to the facts You can't bring divine fire to these lyrical attacks, no racks I thought your bars were solid, but i see your bulged Crush your skeleton, your ribs n' make yo head bludgeoned Cuz as of right now, you a cartoon character You holdin' a social mental barrier but i'm scarier Checked out your song, my GOD! YOU SOUND HORRIBLE! When i rap i'm like Ivan the terrible bringin pon you da destroya You ain't neva looked into the face of death tho you like to dictate Thinkin' im jailbat, but i'm an inmate turn your substance to phosphate You don't belong in this rap, ballin cuz music is my callin' Corner me in the boxing ring, i'ma beat you till my knuckles break! You'll search in that stash for some cash to use brass 1's for your sake But your scared to fight someone who fight dirty, i don't wait You couldn't see me with your 15 inch 4 Asian eyes Go call your allies cuz i'm not facin' someone my size That's why they call you spaceking, cuz you king of absolutely nothing to your rep you cling as i sling stones n' shine in the ring, it's my thing You just a lil baby bird compared to me the grand master, i take you under my wing
Rap battle

My opponent stinks so badOh boy this is so very sad His lines don't even rhymeReading them it's like eatin' lemon lime His verses make absolutely no senseHe builds up such a poor defense I can tell his head's quite denseSo now I'm goin' on the offenseYou think my face is light?I'll make you feel contriteBeat you up so bad you shiver in frightTo me you got no living rightI'll skin you to the bonesThen throw you in the asylumWhen I'm done with you, you'll prefer Davy JonesFor I'll cut off all your hilum [1]Then let you bleed 'til you cryBombs blow you up high into the skyMy goodness, you face is pale whiteLike that sappy vampire in TwilightSo beware me, the mighty king, You better plea for your safety in the boxing ringYou can run, but you can't hideAll your friends I'll just cast aside![1] http://en.wikipedia.org...(anatomy)
Gay marriage should remain illegal

HOLD IT! CROSS EXAMINATION! Koon's previous debates were nothing more than an act of stupidity.Let me show you the evidence. http://www.debate.org...In fact, his debates includes trolling debatesHe chooses the most unlikly side of at most disadvantage then concludes in koon spouting nonsense. http://www.debate.org... Round 3, first post he decides to write this"Omg u fgt u r posting to much, i m right u r not idc bout ur aruments, so i m right. idont care u r obviusly a omg u r not good. i am disapointed" Thats koon, that how dumb he sounds. As you see his opponent "MrJosh" has been a victim of his trolling.But there are much more behind this.In round 2 of that debate, MrJosh has put effort, thinking, time, skill and much more but "koon" decides to spout nothing more than a solution of a fanboy and a idiotic blindless Justin Bieber fan.This means we know his phycological thinkingCROSS EXAMINATION X2 IN DEPTH PHCOANALYSIS THINKING http://www.youtube.com...There are 2 things we know about koon.No.1 He has the mind of Justin Bieber fan No.2 He has the thought of stupidity This means that he has the thinking and a mind of a stupid 5 year old What can we do with these evidence you ask.He could be either mental or a complete idiotNow we know why he is doing this!Subjects of many idiots are known for being bullied is school and same for being mental.HE CAN'T MAKE FRIENDS THEREFORE HE GOES ONLINE AND TROLL!But your thinking "how could mind of a 5 year old do this"It is simple. when i was five, i knew how to play Counter strike. Moving on!"how does he know how to spell"He asks his parents and parents care therefore parents help children in writing. FACT! Now we know that koon has these features:Loner IdiotTrollMind of a 5 year oldThought of a justin bieber fan includes; blindless thoughts That he sit on his personal computer all dayThat he is a common victim of bulliesHUMAN ANATOMY OF KOONAs you see in this in this debate http://www.debate.org...As you look at their avatars. It shows clearly that the two 4 year olds are ganging up on koon for being a Everything i listed above.The two 4 year olds are bashing koon up but how does "koon" get bashed up.Now, if you know anything about Human anatomy you know the term laterality which referes to the preference that most human shows one side of their body over the other as seen in this kung fu stance. He expose one sideBully 1 and bully 2He got bashed because he exposed one side of his body to the other bully giving koon the lowest chance possible to attack back against bully 2.As you see they both forfieted all roundshttp://www.debate.org...This is because he went to hospital and the bullies were in children jail.This shows why and how he didn't do that debate.WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO NOW!
Black Americans have more power than any other group

My opponent seems to be arguing that black people can say absolutely anything across all media without receiving some kind of blow-back. Having given absolutely no examples and painting with an absurdly large brush, allow me to provide a couple of examples that contradict that assertion. PARIS DENNARD is an African American conservative political speaker who frequently appears on CNN. As a Trump supporter, his political opinions are ravaged on social media and he is labeled an "Uncle Tom" for supporting those who are widely perceived to be oppressing his community (racially speaking). Not only is he attacked by other African Americans, he is attacked by Liberals at large for not towing the narrative of black oppression. KANYE WEST is an African American who constantly gets into trouble for unapologetically shouting his opinions (including, but not limited to, his support for Trump) into microphones all around the world. He also believed Taylor Swift shouldn't have been given a Grammy Award over Beyonce, which didn't go over well across all media platforms. In a more general sense, this argument presented (and apparently prematurely posted) by my opponent suggests that black people have more "freedom of speech" than other races. I am unaware of any non-African Americans jailed or arrested for speaking their mind unless that speech directly insights violence (a right that is not afforded to anyone under the law, regardless of race). What I believe my opponent is concerned about is the court of public opinion and being on the "wrong end" of it. Everyone has the right to speak their mind but nobody has the right to be protected from the opinions of other people. Nobody knows that better than minorities who, once upon a time, were judged as inferior human beings by the majority of white Americans. I'll leave this rebuttal with a clich" quote that, I believe, perfectly applies to my opponent's argument. When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.
Black Americans have more power than any other group

Media: There is literally nothing (no matter how racist , sexist, messed up , cruel or untrue it is) at this point that a black person cannot say across any media (print, news, radio and online ... where they are also afforded greater rights to suppress and push down/suspend/delete behavior or truths that go against their narrative or delusions of persecution on google, wikipedia, other reference sites, snopes and other once credible rumor sites... and thus facebook, twitter and the social media sites that rely on these debunked means of debunking things. Schools: Its fairly clear at this point (given a congressional hearing had to be had in the wake of violent, disruptive and oppressive trampling on the freedom of speech of anyone (no ma
We should not have to live alongside sex offenders, drug addicts and the fat

Many thanks to Crushilista for his considered thoughts on this matter. I tend to agree that we must treat this issue with delicacy and restraint - nobody wants to see smokers, drinkers, or slightly chubby people exiled from society. However, the obese, as the report I referred to in my opening argument proved, do have a significant negative impact on children of normal weight, just as convicted kiddie-fiddlers and the scum who peddle hard drugs do. Now, while paedophilia and drug-dealing is still socially unacceptable, being grossly overweight is becoming less so. Those of us who live in the West need only visit our shopping centre to see gratuitous gluttons unashamedly mooching about in pursuit of their endless quest for gastronomic gratification, totally unashamed of their appearance or behaviour. In days gone by, these people would have been shunned by society: condemned for their profligate consumption of excessive amounts of food and their general laziness, but these days, society is coming to accept that being greedy and indolent is the norm rather than the exception, which is a very dangerous and must be discouraged by all means possible. Thank you. http://www.youtube.com... P.S. I'm glad my R1 argument made my opponent laugh - it was, of course, supposed to!
We should not have to live alongside sex offenders, drug addicts and the fat

I agree with you that we shouldn't let Sex Offenders or Drug SELLERS live near our children. I see nothing wrong with someone who smokes pot living next to people seeing as it wouldn't make him go crazy and it's being used personally. Although some fat kids may not be active, some others may well be. I am a fat teenager. I weight lift twice a week until normal lifting starts then I lift an hour a day Monday through Thursday. The things you have in quotations I must honestly say made me laugh. The reason that there is a strong link between teenagers own weight and that of their closest peers isn't because they magically start eating more when they see someone else do so. This is because they could have their peers mock them and make fun of them, which would make them go to eating as a way to forget their problems. If you were in a school system you'd see a lot of drug users who have no problem with grades or even social interactions. Saying that the kids will all of a sudden feel a consistent force to eat more by being around fat people is a tad bit ridiculous. Also if you became technical, a drug could be considered alcohol and cigarettes. Now if we moved anyone that wanted to have a drink of beer or smoke cigarettes into another community, there would be tons of communities stuffed full of people. Not only would that be ridiculous, but it would be unsafe to have all those people so close together. It's almost like imprisoning people when they can't force other people to eat also. That is my thoughts on the debate.
We should not have to live alongside sex offenders, drug addicts and the fat

These days, many parents do not allow their kids to walk or cycle to school as they may have done themselves when they were teenagers. This is largely due to the risk, perceived or real, of their children coming into contact with any of the numerous paedophiles and drug pushers that now infest our neighbourhoods. However, there is another category of undesirable people that kids would be very unlikely to encounter either walking or cycling to school: the fat. However, when they get to school, normal children are forced to mix with overweight children and, worse still, they are made to treat them with dignity and respect. This is despite the fact that the unhealthy eating habits that lead to obesity are "contagious" and there is "a strong link between teenagers own weight and that of their closest peers." http://news.bbc.co.uk... As a society, we don't allow teenage drug addicts to be educated alongside regular students and we don't allow convicted paedophiles to become teachers, so why do we continue to put our kids in harms way by allowing fat children to attend the same schools as them? Obviously, some people are overweight due to medical conditions such as hypothyroidism and Prada Willi syndrome, and these unfortunate people should not be considered part of the problem. However, the fact is that over 99% of the fat are overweight because they consume more calories than they expend, in other words they are gluttonous and lazy. This is their choice, just as drug addicts choose to snort cocaine or inject themselves with heroin. http://www.nhs.uk... Isn't it about time we woke up and realised that sex offenders, illegal drug users and the fat should be housed in separate communities in order to prevent them from harming decent, hard-working people and their children? Thank you. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com...
Animals and enviroments

Since he gets a one-round lapse on sources, so do I. "There used to be 450,000 lions now there are 20,00 and it hasn't affected us. " That's because you live in America. I think you'll find that it has changed the African landscape a big deal. "In this world its natural selection survival of the fittest meaning animals will kill each other off. " True, but ecosystems reach a point of equilibrium, where the numbers in all species are constant. Keeping ecosystems at equilibrium makes them more efficient because that is what they are adapted to. It works a bit like an economic equilibrium. "There have been several situations where farms were shut down during irrigation due to a bug that was endangered. " Red herring. I would argue that the bug should be moved to a wildlife park. The point is that the bug should be protected. A wrong means can still lead to a just end. "over the years animals have show adapt to the worst conditions. " Oh, so what do you imagine happened to all the animals that didn't adapt - you know, Mammoths and the like. In New Zealand, our native bird population was almost entirely wiped out a few years ago thanks to rats. They are far from having adapted - and rats have been here for 200 years! "we can always breed more or whatever" You make it sound like it is easy. Once the population gets small you start to have in-breeding, which, like in humans, produces inferior offspring. "There environment is fine, we have more trees now then we had hundreds of years ago. " 1) Not all animals live in trees 2) Hundreds of years ago . .. I suppose you must mean before 70% of the world's rain-forest was cut down? If so, then where are these magical extra trees planted? "economy one word that we need to look at before animals" why? Ultimately, the only reason why the economy is important is because it sustains us. What use is an economy if there is no environment for it to exist in? Animals create environments. "why should we stop our cancer research, aid research, and everything else to send money we don't have to save animals" Maybe we shouldn't, but I'm still for animals. If it isn't sensible right now, I agree medicine and health should take priority over spending. But when we have resources, we should do it. Why? See my last round. Our society exists within the wider environmental construct. We need the environment just as the environment needs us. On a related note, in New Zealand (where I live), we spend only a few million a year on conservation, yet it generates us billions of dollars in tourism revenue. Helping the environment can therefore help the economy too.
Animals and enviroments

First in this debate i will talk about animal importance and why they arent as important and then economic issues 1st animals don't play a big part in America as people think. There used to be 450,000 lions now there are 20,00 and it hasn't affected us. In this world its natural selection survival of the fittest meaning animals will kill each other off. Animals do not always provide better things for farms. There have been several situations where farms were shut down during irrigation due to a bug that was endangered. We are already at a shortage of jobs why jeopardize more. Sure its not right to move into animals territory and destroy everything. But look over the years animals have show adapt to the worst conditions. The animals are not that big of a deal, we can always breed more or whatever. There environment is fine, we have more trees now then we had hundreds of years ago. On to my matter of this debate, economy one word that we need to look at before animals. We were projected to be in 600,000,000 dollars in debt as of 2008, why should we stop our cancer research, aid research, and everything else to send money we don't have to save animals. Before looking at helping the environment how do you plan on helping when we as a country don't have the money to do this explain why we should help animals and how we can for me please. (please note i haven't had time to post my sources im still looking for where i found some of my info i will post my sources next round thanks.)
Animals and enviroments

In this debate, I need to defend animals and environments. I will first defend animals, then environments. DEFINITIONS: Animals - any creature of class animalia Environments - the whole world, including natural and urban environments ANIMALS: Animals are worth defending because they contribute to the biodiversity of the planet. Biodiversity is good to maintain because: 1) It boosts ecosystem productivity - so we get more food to solve our food crisis, bio-fuel to solve our fuel crisis, wood to save the rain-forest, we can pollute more and not suffer consequences - for now, and in to the future (. http://www.globalissues.org...) 2) It is good for our mental health (. http://www.world-science.net...) 3) Having a greater gene pool may help future genetic research. ENVIRONMENTS: These are worth defending because people depend on them. Without environments there would be no food (farms are an environment), no water (seas are an environment), no air (also an environment) . .. indeed, neither we nor the world would even exist. I think prima face the world's existence is better than the world's non-existence, and if my opponent thinks otherwise I'd be interested to hear his case. I look forward to hearing my opponent's counter-argument.
Atheism says there is no God, therefore it is not possible to win Pascal's Wager.

Placing a wager against an outcome doesn't imply that you even believe that outcome is possible. The Atheist just believes that the Theist has presented a suckers bet, and doesn't realize it. If someone were to present you a bet regarding what gender you are doesn't imply that the opposite of what you bet is possible if you place your bet. You just know what the outcome of that bet will be with absolute certainty. As long as the Atheist has children, and has passed down their knowledge they never really leave. They've lost nothing, and as long as their lineage remains they've gained a semblance of immortality. In the end winning, and losing in Pascal's Wager is a perspective issue. How you define winning, and how you define losing is all subjective, and in the eye of the beholder. The Theist will never truly understand why the Atheist sees clear victory where the Theist sees only loss, and vice versa. It is probably best not to wager on God existence, but rather discover it.
Atheism says there is no God, therefore it is not possible to win Pascal's Wager.

If an atheist places a chip against God, the the atheist is saying God is there to place a chip against and is no longer an atheist. An atheist has nobody to argue against, an atheist asserts there is no God so there is nothing to wager about. An atheist cannot win Pascal's Wager because the atheist says there is no God. In the end, the atheist according to their beliefs, loses everything they ever had and everything they ever did is lost from them and they take nothing with them when their time is over. If they can't take it with them when they leave, they didn't win anything.........they lost it all. Ideas or feelings of immortality an atheist may have stocked in descendants are not the immortality of the atheist. The atheist is mortal, and loses everything in the end and can take nothing with him believing there is no God to pay off Pascal's Wager. It is not possible for an atheist to win Pascal's Wager. TY 4 a decent debate, Medv, not conceding but you will probably win.
Atheism says there is no God, therefore it is not possible to win Pascal's Wager.

In Pascal's Wager what you are wagering is your behavior. Abstain from what is considered sin, and live as if God did exist. However, the wager varies widely. For Catholic Priests, Shakers, and others that wager is celibacy. This is the biggest bet you could make with your life to gain favor with a God that may, or may not exist. The Atheist bet is simple. Every chip is placed against God. For an Atheist, the closest to immortality is having children that are raised with the same values well enough for them to do the same. With that you at least have the chance at a kind of immortality though your children passing down your genes, and values. If God doesn't exist the Atheist can win, and if God does exist the Atheist can still have a partial victory though their children. It would be best to bet as if you're going to Hell anyways, and bet like an Atheist since that has two ways to win. Thank you.