This debate is hardly, not nearly-not not, not not, not not, NOT, not NOT, NOT confusing!

Monkeys! I did say that the audience is confused but that monkeys traversing the bars is not fully confusing, more on that later. My opponent said "obviously it will be difficult to understand why they will be smiling but want to kill you at the same time". He had previously almost said: humans and monkeys are very similar and that humans are evil, but the monkeys are smiling. I think this proves that monkeys are evil and want to kill you, therefore proving the theory that the monkeys traversing the bars is to confuse the audience they want to kill. Where did my opponent slip up? By almost implying that scary looking, smiling monkeys are just like scary looking smiling humans like in the following pictures, clearly evil humans. Do you deny that the caption on the poker face monkey almost said “I would like to murder you”? It is basic admittance that the monkey would like you dead. Violets are still violet Although poetry is confusing it is not fully confusing to everyone (more on this later). Shakespeare understands poetry and it is my supposition that this understanding might not have to be genetic. If it is I may or may not be a relative of his and could be a potential translator for poetry. My “poem” said that simply because Violets are called blue they may not actually be blue. They are indeed called violet, but nothing rhymes with violet so they call them blue in your picture. In other words: just because you say something does not make it true. For more info on saying something please see Drake’s “say something” lyrics: http://www.metrolyrics.com... This debate is Almost NOT confusing! My opponent more or less said that this debate is indeed almost not confusing. They then pointed out that they where Con and therefore trying to confuse you, the voters (what a mean thing to do right?) They may have to prove the debate is confusing but I, Pro, Have to prove that the debate is ALMOST not confusing. This debate has to make a bit of sense to you for me to win. I am attempting to help you voters, because I, Pro, care about you! Explaining "We". (like) I did get the reference; you are family Aladdin and Genie! After that adventure you had I bet it seems like you are incredibly close! The main argument: If you could not read my opponents admittance of a non-confusing main argument here you go: Can you refute an invisible yet not entirely invisible argument? Yes, invisible is not confusing, and neither is poor visibility (both which were presented.) But what if you combine the two, and have something in between? You can barely see these words, I know it. If you are reading this, then congratulations. You are a genius. Yet, how did I do this? Isn't that confusing? And what's this? ACTUAL invisible yet not invisible-at-the-same time-SPANISH?? Jaja, usted es probablemente muy confundido en este momento mientras lees esta frase española. Not to mention ACTUAL non-invisible yet invisible GREEK! Z8;λα τα επιχειρ^2;ματα που μου ^1;ρχονται μαζ^3; για να υποστηρ^3;ξει ιδ^1;α μου, και σκοτεινa2; το^3;χο του αντιπ^0;λου μου δεν την βοηθοa3;ν το λιγa2;τερο λ^3;γο για να νικ^2;σει το ψ^2;φισμα. Translated the Spanish means: Haha, you are probably very confused right now as you read this Spanish phrase.He then uses Greek, a hard to translate language, to attempt to support his previous statement by almost maybe stating this Greek supports my paragraph by design. (also you simply used "stike-through" and paste from word) Scarecrow Song You have not said that you have or don’t have scarecrows around you, I assume that you do, because who doesn’t? The scarecrow song does not always turn people into scarecrows but it does give them gifts. I hope the voters who have not been turned into scarecrows find their gift and take it as a bribe from Pro! By the way it is good to see you are not a scarecrow con, That means you get a gift too, one you must find! Your Welcome! I will forgive you if searching for this gift takes too much time and you must forfeit, the voters may not. Have a almost not not not not NOT NOT NOT NOT nice day con!