The god of the bible does not exist

Seasoned beating with my egg-pressed rectal itch and thermometer reading 136 degrees fahrenheit on the ballroom floor. Btw, Cut the italics, K? They are very hard to read and you are not impressing anybody with your pepperjack formatting. DDO doesn"t have good formatting. "I begin my argument, I would like to go ahead and throw a wrench into this argumentative debate. " Welp Yah are incapable of that with a little of blah blah black sheep have you any stool? Yes sir. Yes sir 3 bags fool. "The title of your debate is, "the god of the bible does not exist. " It is up to you, The theist, No exceptions, None, All the time, To prove that your god exists. After all your god has never been proved. Not by the smallest amount of toilet dust has he since his first biblical inception. Now its not up to the atheist to prove that your god exists now is it by golly? Why no its not. Duh. "Continuing on, I like that you stated no, "scientific methodology" allowed in this debate. " We"re going to toss out your entire paragraph of whatever, Which is an excuse, Well you know, Something like burping burning bubbling pancakes down your pigmented pie face of covered zits that had nothing whatsoever to do with science, And only your made up trash can plucked nose hairs, I mean can"t you read? You are after all a perfectly fit so-called christian that can"t! Its not that hard. So once again, Your bible offered no scientific, In other words no science whatsoever, None, No science, Got it to prove your god"s existence. "One way to demonstrate that God exists therefore, Is to take for consideration. . . " Well by the very word "consideration" that"s not proof now is it? Do you want the definition of "consideration"? "people who believe that God exists" A belief is not proof. "Then you have other people who try to demonstrate that God does not exist, " And yet you did not mention them. And what would their proof be that this god of YOURS does not exist? Really? SeInvent better moronic excuses please. "The fallacy of an argument for or against God's existence is that neither are provable. " Well see its not a fallacy. Because all you have to prove your god is your bible and nothing else is which no "god" would be stupid enough, Not ever, Not for any reason to use text, Namely your bible, As a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible with all of the errors in it. Hardly godly. Science makes mistakes. But that"s man"s doing. Man is not god. BIG HUGE MONUMENTAL DIFFERENCE. But at least science, Some of it is proven fact whereas none of your god is. "Your statement that the Bible used no scientific evidence to prove God's existence is straw-man. Can you prove this to be true or not? " Yeah, The---bible---did---not---present---any---scientific---evidence---to---prove---its---god's---existence. Just proved it. Now you OR ANYONE prove to be false. I love it when silly little aphid spits try to use their intellects on chicken whispers that they know nothing about. Yep. Its shows that YOU have not read YOUR bible to not know that there"s no science in it to show that it does not prove your god. Its completely laughable. You"d never make a good talk show guest to pan out your un-individuality. Sure! Take the bible at its word! Then you do exactly what it says boy toy Deuteronomy 13: 9-10 and Deuteronomy 17:2-5 and you come on down here and kill me because I do not worship your god. GOT IT you total ignoramus? Now what point did you make other than YOUR unproven god is completely immoral? "I know what you are going to say, " No you don"t know what I"m going to say. You don"t have the foggiest clue. That"s why I"m going to ignore the rest of what you had to say for the RD and see how far down the rabbit's hole you will dig yourself into. And you know me, I"m really really really good at baiting people.