No One Has Ever Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to Do Look More Like

1. Clarificality "You cannot be so happy that everyone in a five mile radius became a unicorn to decide to use even if you cant even be that even even if you decided to."This only supports my resolution by showing how even more strongly impossible it is to go far even as decide to use even."This is assuming that such a person could even get that far to even use even and live though, which cant even be accepted because neither even or even even isnt given."Once again, my opponent is only proving me right by showing how impossible it is that anyone ever went far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.2. Probability Can't Even "Even I agree that the probability of anyone even going far even to use even would to do look more like would be questioned, thats just math."And yet here we are arguing over probability. My argument doesn't seem so silly after all, does it, jury? "But the odds of even a child who is even capable of even going far even as deciding to use even and then going want to do look more like isnt 81 trillion squared, the square is squared so that the square of 900,000 is squared by square, which means it is 900,000 to the fourth, not 81 trillion squared."Whether the odds are 1 in 81 trillion squared or 1 in 900,000 to the fourth, I would never bet the farm on either odds. That being said, my opponent admits that being capable of going far even as deciding to use even and then going want to do look more like is extremely unlikely if not impossible."The true equation for the od[d]s of ev[e]n a child of even going far even to decide to use even to do look more like is 108 Bllion / 900,000 suare square. which is 108 Billion / 900,000 ^4 which gives us .0000000000165%."That may sound irrational and improbable, but when you become far enough even to use even to do look more like then the multiplicity even of the even nebula is entered which allows even anyone to access the even number of infinite multiverses, of which the even of people even deciding to use even to do look more like is multiplied by the speed of even, which is 4 times 10^14.so .0000000000165% multiplied by 4 x 10^12% = 66% Which means that it is not just probable, but likely. Almost as likely as the chance to use even to do look more like in the first place. "(Note the Grammar mistakes, jury. I want my extra point.)This statistic is hugely inaccurate. For one to be able to access the infinite multiverses in the first place, they would have to be capable of not only using even, but using even for even gone even to even AS even AS IF. The odds of that are nonexistent; my opponent's fallacy is invalid.3. The Economy Just Can't Bro"But your own picture graph shows that If you were for by decided to as economic for sometimes but lift when gone as for not half even gone too where 9.81% of leaders said yes that those leaders are the economic capitalists of the even decisions and but lift when gone as for not half! That means that the most powerful economies in the world WOULD agree to be decided to as economic for sometimes but lift when gone as for not even while the other 91% of the already poor world would choose to not decide to as economic for soemtimes but lift when gone as for not even."Look at the chart. Now back to me. Now back to the chart. Now back to me. My opponent argues that the 9.81% who said yes are the stronger economies, but he still has the burden to prove that statement. Needless to say, he has done nothing to prove that statement. So here's the proof for all you evidence hunters. The world leaders who answered "yes" belonged mainly to developing countries [http://1.bp.blogspot.com...].Therefore, we still know for a FACT that the majority of well-developed economies would stroke at the idea of someone really going far even as deciding to look even go want to do look more like.4. YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE PROOF."But If A and then Not B thus then not C, then G will cause F to not cause D which is vital for E, which cannot happen since A and E must be present otherwise G wouldnt be around since not D nor B. Also if G then A and G, not A and E, meaning 14 not 12. Since 14 and not 12 then pineapple exists, meanign spongebob is paying rent. Since the rent is being paid, C is assured which means that A and E is only a Vagina, not a penis."Yay for grammar pointsPeople of the jury, my opponent is taking you all for idiots. "A and E" IS a vagina, but when written as "A&E", it's a penis.For further elaboration, check out this ancient argument developed by the great philospher Mick Jagger:P1: "and" is a girl word.P2: "&" is a pretty manly symbol.P3: A _ E's gender can be alternated.P4: If A and E, then vagina.P5: If A "&" E, then penis.C: A&E is a dick.By this, my original proof remains valid, my entire philosophical argument remains sound, and the resolution still stands.Therefore, because my opponent generally agrees with how freakishly impossible the whole thing is, the economy as we know it could not exist if such an event ocurred, and Mick Jagger, no one has ever been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.See video for further understanding if you're still confused. http://www.youtube.com...VOTEPRO