The Bible is not a reliable source of information.

Allow me to state some basic points and then I will go into detail about each and every one of them:1. The Bible has been edited numerous times. Also, the book has been translated from Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic into English. Therefore, some of the original ideas have been distorted.2. The Bible is based on the hallucinations of peasants and distortions of facts.3. There is no scientific evidence to support that the Bible is in fact God's Word.4. Christians who believe in the Bible are not listening to facts, but they rather assume the Bible is telling the truth.Point One: The Bible's EditsThe Bible has been edited numerous times. The original languages of the Bible were Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic."The Bible was actually written inthreedifferent ancient languages:Hebrew, Aramaic,andGreek. While (a modern version of) each of these languages is spoken today, most modern readers of those languages would have some difficulty with the ancient versions used in the Biblical texts. " [1]Due to the "difficulty with the ancient versions used in the Biblical texts," the modern Bible is only a distortion of the original text. Not only has the language of the Bible changed, but the context has changed as well. Unfortunately, I cannot find any links on the internet to support this claim, but I assure you, it is fact. All the links I have attempted are absolutely terrible and I would not want to use them in this debate due to their format and wording.Point Two: What the Bible is based uponThe Bible, my friend, is not based on fact. The Bible is based upon hallucinations, illusions, and distortions of facts. Tell me, what is the name of the person who wrote this book? What other evidence other than God's Word - which is untrue - supports the Bible's claims?Point Three: Scientific EvidenceThere is no scientific evidence to support the claim that the Bible is God's Word and that what is written in it is the truth."The archaeological evidence of the Bible is scarce. In fact, it is non-existent. After 200 years of Christian archaeologists digging up the wholeMiddle East, they haven't found any proof of the Exodus of the Jews from Egypt, Hebrew Slaves or the Ten Plagues. NONE!!! And this from a nation of people who wrote EVERYTHING down in stone!! And Sinai has no proof of any largegroup of peopletravelling through it EVER!!! The first evidence correlating to the biblical story doesn't appear in Canaan archaeology until around 100 years before the Babylonian Captivity (around 600 BC).This lack of evidence includes persons such as David and Solomon who should be recorded in other nations and supposedly lived relatively close to those who wrote the Bible in theBabylonian Captivityaround 500 B.C." [2]The evidence against the Bible is miraculous and cannot be denied. If you want to prove the Bible being true, you must prove Creation. Prove that the Earth is only thousands, not billions of years old. Prove the existence of Adam and Eve. Prove the existence of Noah's Ark. Prove the existence of the Ten Commandments. Prove the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Prove these things and my view may change. Until you find solid evidence that supports Creation, I remain convinced that Evolution is the truth.Point Four: Christians' AssumptionsI do not understand why Christians - or any person, for that matter - can assume the Bible is the truth. Just because it is written black on white and just because it speaks in a powerful way, does that automatically make it true? The evidence against the Bible is outrageously immense. TannerJK, you are a Christian. May I ask, why do you assume the Bible is true?I have plenty more arguments, but I choose to save them for later. I await your response. References:[1 ] http://www.biblegateway.com...[2] http://www.probe.org...