Christians are NOT able to determine fairly if Jesus is really the True messiah

1) When I say that it is unreasonable to think that God would send a Messenger without giving Him ample proof to validate His claim, that does not help your argument. The OT is laden with proofs of Christ's coming, the thing is are you willing to look? Jesus answers the question that Isa 41:22-23 poses by saying in John 5:39-40 & Matt 16:3, that you (the people) claim to read the Scriptures yet have a better understanding of predicting the weather than predicting the signs of God that were manifest in Jesus. So the Men that rejected the Faith that Jesus offered them, were no more that glorified weathermen. Therefore proof is provided, yet the reason why there's those who reject Jesus is because they refuse to study. Simple. For example, I'm sure you've heard people saying, "I know you can hear me but did you listen?" & similarly I can respectfully tell you & others that "I know you can read it but did you understand?" Only 2 answers can be generated from such a question; yes or no. If yes, then you should have an unshakable faith in Christ & His Message because you claim to understand it. If no, then that is proof enough that you have not looked, studied and understood. So when the days of Moses were ended, & the light of Jesus encompassed the world, all the people of Israel went against Him. If you want examples then read John 8:41-42, where Jesus was protested against & He responds & says if you love God then you'd love Me, which is a clear indication that if anyone is to love Jesus, then they should love Him due to the investigation they've done into His claim & not blind love. So the people went against Jesus & said that the advent of Him that the Bible had foretold must fulfill the laws of Moses. The thing is, this young Nazarene (Jesus), who laid claim to the station of the divine Messiah, had annulled the law of divorce & of the sabbath day"the most weighty of all the laws of Moses. No one can just walk around annulling laws that God had prescribed to Mankind at that time, but Christ did & that is worthy of investigation. On top of that, the people of Israel are even to this day still expecting that Manifestation which the Bible hath foretold! How many Manifestations of Holiness, how many Revealers of the light everlasting, have appeared since the time of Moses, & yet Israel, wrapt in the densest veils of satanic fancy & false imaginings, is still expectant that the idol of her own handiwork will appear with such signs that they themselves had created! So to reject Jesus means you reject God's love, & therefore rejecting Him means you reject the whole Bible, because you did not do what God had asked of you. 2) I mentioned "Christians do not believe in blind faith" because I am referring to the Christian that Jesus describes & there are plenty in the world today. Just because the Christians you have interacted with aren't reflecting the standard that Jesus asks, then it should be your duty to help them understand the importance of their role in society, & not reject the Message entirely. Verily, it is more bountiful for 1 to change a 1000, than a 1000 to change 1. Be that 1. 3) Your response in the 3rd point you offer, is very squirmishy (A term which means showing signs of discomfort). I gave you an elaborate, well thought out example & relates to society's expectation of 2 types of Messiahs. My point is clearly proven about society clinging to the 2nd portrait of the Messiah being King, because you clearly say that Christ was no king & there is no evidences of him fulfilling anything. So you just did what society is doing today. Point proven. In addition, I have to respectfully tell you that the example I provided above was read but not understood, which is another point that society is doing today, & that also proves the point that people read but don't understand. Not understanding that the Messiah is Jesus is due of the false imaginings & wishful expectations that society creates, which you have unfortunately adopted. I beg you to reconsider the this way of analyzing the Bible & adopt the way of analysis that God prescribes through Jesus, which is investigate the claims...thoroughly. 4) Jer 33:15: This verse, like Psalms 132:1, like Jer 23:5-6 & others, says that the Messiah will be a descendant of David. However one of these prophecies is Isa 7:14 where the prophet Isaiah addresses the "house of David," meaning his family & descendants, & speaks of a virgin being pregnant with a child, & giving birth to the child. Isaiah says this in the context of it being a sign from God. He also says that the child would be referred to as Immanuel, which means, God with us. The NT books of Matt & Luke record details involving the birth of Jesus, who was born about 700 years after the time of Isaiah, saying that he was born of the virgin Mary & is the Son of God. Because He claimed to be the Son of God, Christ literally can be referred to as "God with us." Therefore this prophecy was fulfilled & Jesus was the King awaited by the Jews. (warning: No Literalism. Focus on Spiritual POV) Side note, it should be noted that the OT uses the word to refer to young, unmarried women, & that unmarried women were culturally & religiously expected to be virgins. One example can be found in Gen 24:43, where it speaks of a person being sought as a bride for Isaac. So in conclusion, read the books of Luke & Matt for reference of His genealogy. 5) Matt 2:15: Here, Matt claims that when Jesus returned with his parents from Egypt he fulfilled Hosea"s line: "Out of Egypt I called my son." It"s weird because Hosea doesn"t seem to be prophesying, rather, appears to be describing an event in Israel"s past. Another puzzle is that Hosea isn"t talking about an individual, much less a coming messiah. The son who was called out of Egypt is the nation of Israel. This has led many to assume that Matt wasn"t concerned with what Hosea meant. The truth is that, Matt correctly understands Hosea & wants his readers to see, in his usage of Hosea 11:1, that Jesus has recapitulated the history of Israel by retracting Israel"s steps up to the point they failed & then continued to obey & succeed in the mission Israel should have carried out". This sort of "exodus" was, in fact already present in Hosea. Matt therefore, simply taps into the exodus that Hosea describes: Israel was rescued from Egypt (Hosea 11:1), sinned, & would therefore, be sent back into Egypt (Hosea 11:5), before being delivered from Egypt once more (Hosea 11:10-11). And, this second Exodus would be led by a davidic king (Hosea 3:5; cf. Hosea 1:11). In sum: Matt says, that Jesus recapitulates Hosea 11:1, as Hosea 11:10-11 expected & all begins when Joseph, Jesus's adoptive father, takes Jesus & his family to Egypt to flee the wrath of King Herod. 6) G-d is ONE and people are forbidden to worship other gods AKA Jesus The 2nd part to this line is quite troublesome & not Scriptural. No where does Jesus say I am God. Christians can say all they want but the Bible has the final word for them. So will you worship Jesus, or the one Jesus worshiped? One big problem the Christians have is that Jesus prayed, & had a God himself. This logically lets us conclude that Jesus can't be God. The right thing to do is worship & pray to the one Jesus prayed to. If Jesus told you that he had a God, would you honestly take Jesus as God? Answer is no. When Jesus prays to a God & said explicitly that he has a God therefore it is pretty ungodly of him to indicate his complete devotion to the one true God if he was God in the first place. Here are some points to consider: John 20:17 Num 23:19 Matt 26:39-44 John 8:42-43 Acts 2:22-23 Acts 17:30-31 1 Tim 2:5 Numbers 23:19 Mark 13:32 Jon 13:3 Matt 16:27 John 17:1-26 John 7:16 John 12:49 *John 8:42-43* John 12:49-50 John 8:25-27 John 14:23-26 Matt 15:24 Matt 16:13-17 Mark 2:10 Mark 5:26-27 In conclusion, study them all carefully, please before you answer. Thanks. Your turn, my good friend :)