9/11 was an Inside Job

Thanks Con. Opening Argument:C1) Building Collapse I'll begin by directly addressing the three towers at the WTC that were brought down, specifically the two main towers that had two separate passenger airliners enter each of them; with the American Airlines Flight 11 flying into the North Tower and United Airlines Flight 175 flying into the South, and the third Tower [Tower 7] simply coming down on its own without any plane crashing into it or any external components. It should come as no surprise that all three towers that came down at the World Trade center were considerably well-made , these buildings were specifically made to withstand pressure--and the event of a plane[s] crashing into them, given their height which stood at 1,368 and 1,368 feet--making them the world's largest buildings. For two such buildings to suddenly come down at a free-fall speed in fact defies basic physics and never has anything remotely similar happened before or after 9/11. The only explanation for the fall of all three towers is controlled demolition, something that can even easily be seen in captured footage--and in comparisons made to other examples of controlled demolitions. Both the North and South Tower showed no sign of falling down and instead were withstanding the steady flames inside; before suddenly as the one hour mark was approaching, the North Tower dramatically collapsed after being followed by the South. The point of the Tower 7 should again be highlighted, as this was the tower that absolutely no plane enter it and would've easily been able to withstand any outside pressures. C2) Thermite Explosives and Witness Testimony Another striking piece of evidence is traces of Nano-thermite found in dust samples and molten metal that was found from all three towers—the only reasonable explanation for this is once again, a controlled demolition in which explosives were planted in the Twin towers. North and South collapse from the top which suggests explosives were placed in the top floors of the buildings, while Tower 7 collapses at ground level; meaning that explosives were placed at the very bottom. Witnesses and survivors of 9/11 have all stated that they heard numerous explosions coming from within the buildings, directly before they fell at free-fall speed; which was well under 10 seconds. Again, why exactly would all three buildings have traces of Nano-thermite in them and why would there be explosions? On the basis of two planes crashing into the towers, they would not occur. C3) Removal of Evidence Instead of examining it and inquiring as to why three supremely well-structured buildings completely collapsed at free-fall speed, the evidence was promptly removed and not examined. The structural steel from the tower was specifically the most important piece of evidence—as it could’ve shown exactly why the buildings collapsed which they should not have. Additional evidence that has been destroyed are tapes that were recorded by around six air traffic controllers who handledhijackings on 9/11/01. This doesn’t stop at the WTC either, after the Pentagon crash officials began immediately to remove all evidence. Naturally this wouldn't’t be an issue if any evidence was presented of the entire 9/11 attacks but it never was. This lack of transparency from the U.S government led to many experts calling for a proper investigation to the 9/11, particularly at the WTC. C4) Pentagon Crash One of the major errors here is how exactly a 38 metre and 13,5 metres high passenger plane could only leave a hole that is 5 metres wide; obviously this is implausible. In addition, every passenger plane crash in history has left debris including large parts of the plane itself, where as no real debris was found at the exact place the plane went into. Given that the plane was supposed to be a Boeing 757, it also would’ve entirely smashed the surrounding windows. There is no way that the wings of such a plane could not demolish them. Another fact is that there were 86 cameras all around the Pentagon building, yet only one camera was used to display footage of the plane and this shows invariably nothing; neither the plane entering the building. Being a passenger plane, the Boeing 757 was also not made to go fast at such a low level [I.E ground] or make quick manoeuvres in the air. The Pentagon airspace is in fact the most protected airspace in the world, so how is that a jet was able to enter it without any deterrence? Any unidentified planes would be observed and dealt with immediately. C5) False Terrorist Link Perhaps one of the most important aspects to the 9/11 Hoax is the terrorist link. The official U.S government version is that a total of 19 Arab terrorists managed to attack three separate buildings, the North and South Towers in New York, and the Pentagon--apparently all at the command of Osama Bin Laden who was accused as the main suspect by the U.S. The first issue in this is the fact that he never made the U.S most wanted list specifically for being responsible for 9/11. Osama never officially confessed to orchestrating the attacks and instead strongly denied all responsibility in 2001, stating that as Muslim he is "strictly forbidden" to "cause harm to innocent women and children". Videos released by the U.S clearly show that the men within them are not Osama, due to the differences in physical appearances and apparently age. Moving to the other 19 accused terrorists, it should be highlighted that manyof them are in fact alive. These include Abdul Aziz Al-Omari, he was quoted in 2001 as saying to British Newspaper the Telegraph: “I couldn't believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and mydate of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with this.”This presents the question of how exactly can a man can fly a plane into the World Trade Center, miraculously survive, escape authorities, and then somehow make it back to Saudi Arabia a few days later? Another was Saeed Al-Ghamdi, accused of being aboard flight, who also reported to the Telegraphin 2001: “I was completely shocked. For the past 10 months I have been based in Tuniswith 22 other pilots learning to fly an Airbus 320. The FBI provided no evidence of my presumed involvement in the attacks.”So rather than flying a plane into the WTC this man was also in the Middle East at the exacttime 9/11 took place. Now onto Waleed Al-Shehri, the Daily Trust reported in 2001 that: “His [Al-Shehri] photograph was released by the FBI, and has been shown in newspapers and on television around the world. That same Mr Al-Shehri has turned up in Morocco, proving clearly that he was not a member of the suicide attack.” Note that the U.S still categorized them as culprits and continued with their "suicide bomber" status evenafter these statements were released and they were found to be alive in the Middle East. Another so-called suicide bomber of the plane that crashed into Pennsylvania, Ahmed Al-Nami, also stated in 2001 in his defence: "I’m still alive, as you can see. I was shocked to see my name mentioned by the American Justice Department. I had never even heard of Pennsylvania where the plane I was supposed to have hijacked.” The BBC additionally reported in 2001: “Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker n the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.” As well as the CNN reporting on another hijacker:“Adnan Bukhari is still in Florida” C6) Zionist Connection The private property developer and former chairman of the Jewish Appeal, Larry Silverstein, signed a lease on the WTC two months prior before the attacks. His initial move upon buying the WTC complex was change the securitycompany to Securacom, a company that George Bush’s brother happened to be the board of directors of. As well as the change in the security, Silverstein also increased the insurance policies of the complex; meaning that he was awarded a full $7,2 billion compensation after the 9/11 attacks. The fact is that the buildings were no longer financially profitable [mainly due to asbestos] and Silverstein and company actually stood a lot to gain—as well as Israel, who Silverstein regularly donates significant amounts of money to.It also seems that Israeli’s within New York were forwarded of the attack, on September 12th 2001 the Jerusalem Post reported: “The Israeli foreign ministry has collected the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attack." However, only one Israeli at the WTC was killed on that day; indicating that the 4,000 number is a rather large amount to have survived without any severe injury. Other pieces of evidence include Israel trying to suppress a classified report on 9/11 and the former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak somehow knowing in an interview with the BBC that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, despite the fact they’d only just happened and that no one had been formally identified. The Zionist Connection to 9/11 connects easily to what *motives* existed. As well as financial gain for one of U.S’s most powerful Jews. There's also the War on Terror that would come soon after the attacks. Having such attacks on the U.S and a large loss of life gave the U.S government the perfect excuse to invade the Middle East on the premise that the U.S was literally under attack by militant Islam and that peoples lives would be in danger if they did not “confront” it directly—by invading Iraq and Afghanistan. The U.S went into Iraq with the primary aim of overthrowing, Saddam Hussein, someone who on the contrary to inciting error actually managed to control extremist fractions within his country. Israel in particular had a lot to gain, and repeatedly advised the U.S to invade. Sources: http://pasted.co...