The monotheistic God of the 3 major monotheistic religions should not be worshiped.

The argument appears to be : "It is pointless to be worshiping something(s) that could possibly exist but not be able to interact with our universe." The reasons for this are : -But, even if there was/were (a) god(s), he/she/it/whatever would only be a spectator. and this is justified by : -From our current understanding of our "universe's" rules also state that no outside force can interfere with anything in our universe ... Pro has taken an interesting approach and does not directly attempt to prove that God does not exist, but attempts to assert that such a being, even if it did not exist could not influence us and thus is not worthy of worship, and he limits influence to the mundane application of what appears to be the fundamental forces. Before we take exception to the argument fundamentals, a few minor, but still very important clarifications : "This is what you can call epic physics ..." This is epic physics : http://fxpaper.fatalsystem.com... From : "very imposing or impressive; surpassing the ordinary" [1] I have no idea what is keeping those assets in the locked and upright position, but by any definition whatever physics is at play is definately epic. In regards to : "In our "universe", infinity can't exist in any form except as a concept." Here the audience screams black hole, singularity - infinite density. However, if we can unite GR and QM and quantize space and time into plankt quanta this will remove the singularity - in fact there are those who use this as an argument that it is necessary for there to be a unification theory. This however is not the only example of infinity in our universe we have of course the ultimate question[2]. Now some will be quick to dismiss this as the ravings of a mad man, but they are naive and they are the same people who are unaware that the world is actually run by time traveling shape shifting lizard people[3]. There is wisdom there, but it only appears to be nonsense as it is infinite in complexity. But these small objections aside, let us turn to the meat of the argument that God if he exists can not exert a force on our universe as he does not exist with in it (as far as we can detect), as Pro exhorts by some unsourced principle of physics. First of all consider dark matter, this is argued by science to exist, even though there is no way to detect it - simply because if it exists then it explains what we see. Again, think of this clearly, dark matter can only be verified by what it does it can not be directly observed it therefore by definition exists outside what we can directly detect in the universe. It is something which has the ability to distort gravity but it can not itself be seen. Now I ask humbly dear readers, is this not what the theist ascribes to God, that it is something which can not be detected by any known means but it has an influence on us, it is what in fact made us, inspires us and is the model by which we can aspire to be all that we can be. Ok, the last part might be Captain America or Batman but the rest of it is definately God. Now why come scientists can talk about dark matter and dark energy and postulate their false idols to worship but a theist can not worship God, it is only acceptable if we have to call him Dark Jesus, is is ok then? As a point in closing, even if all of the above is true and it is impossible for Dark Jesus to exert a direct force on earth, still should he not be worshipped for being a shining beacon of inspiration. Even if he does not answer your prayers and make Megan Fox appear at will (ok she is kind of skanky now - but pre-crazy vampire movie she was pretty epic in her own right). After all, worship just means adoring reverence[5], thus even if Dark Jesus can not actually turn Gatorade into Budweiser does not the fact that he was killed and returned to life at least give the man some reverence. If Flavor Flav can get a string of TV shows I don't think that is too much to ask for Dark Jesus. P.P.S (on a serious note infinite is not a value it can not be used in algebra as noted in the above, infinity is just a term which is used to label a type of set - in lay language a set is infinite if there exists a sub-set with the same cardinality (number of elements)). [1] http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu... [2] http://www.youtube.com... [3] http://www.rense.com... [4] http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov... [5] http://dictionary.reference.com...