Trayvon Martin equally acted in self-defense against George Zimmerman

I am going to keep this simple and just break it down with logic. First not myself but an entire panel of people saw fit that George Zimmerman was assaulted. Not just the jury itself either, the judge and everyone else who was associated with the case. While most of this evidence is based off of eye witness accounts, all the different eye witnesses have contradicting evidence so it is quite subjective. First the claim that Zimmerman was not suppose to be following trayvon. This in fact was an act of self defense within it self by Zimmerman. Trayvon was in a Gated community where he did not belong. Zimmeran would quickly notice this seeing as how he is a regular and resident there. No rule was ever specified to show that he was not allowed to carry a gun, while different articles and stories will ague this with bias. It was recommended that they be careful with carrying guns because it would have been a better idea to call the police department. Zimmerman being licensed to carry a gun had no fault in this. It was also a commonly accepted rule to generally not follow someone. If this were always the case what would be the point of a watch. Zimmerman could have just left it alone, and called it in and trayvon could have robbed and killed someone. It can be construed as Zimmerman making a heroic act by taking it upon himself to make sure know one was injured. Which we later find out, that he was unknowingly justified by this because of trayvons track record. Suspension because of multiple vandalism accounts. Its not as if we are discussing George Zimmerman killing a catholic nun, we are discussing George Zimmerman acting in defense to a teen with a big track record and bad temper. So by all logical accounts of the evidence we can assume Zimmerman approached him. Then by the 911 calls we can also assume the got in an altercation because trayvon was mad that he was approached(All while in a gated community that he had no place being). So I am pretty sure we could be safe to assume Zimmerman asked him to remain still while he called the cops or someone was brought there to investigate it. As we can tell by the scars on Zimmermans head treyvon did like that. This next part is subjective, but we can only assume. At any point if trayvon was on top of Zimmerman hitting him, and George Zimmerman felt his life was in danger because of it being smashed on a side walk. He had the right to defend himself. This includes a normal assault. If someone walks up to you with a knife or threatens to kill you and grabs you, under Florida state law you are permitted to end their life to save yours. I will say this. Imagine you have a Gun and were on the way back from the store. Some guy is walking in your yard. You walk up to him and ask him to stand still while you call the cops to see what he is doing there. This guy who is breaking the law by being in the wrong place, then gets mad and assaults you. If you have a gun handy, you may feel the need to use it because your family and everyone else is inside that house. You also have no idea what this man is capable of but you can see he will assault people due him bashing your head on a sidewalk. It is not just me who shares this opinion it is an entire jury and courtroom who ruled in favor of this. People get so upset and tag the word racsim on it because its easy to do. If i had a quarter for every time that there was an altercation between a black man and a white man, and the white man ends up dead I would be retiring right now. None of these cases are pegged as Racism. I think it is quite clear to assume, Zimmerman had every right to follow him and every right to defend himself even if it mean the life of a later exposed criminal.