Capitalism is responsible for the detrimental effects to human life

I'm not going to waste a lot of time on debunking my opponent's asinine claims, so my argument may seem brash, but he hasn't addressed any of my points rationally and continues labelling things as capitalism that aren't. He is either trolling or incredibly ignorant of economics and political philosophy.Dumb reason #3My opponent states that the US government spends money purchasing military products from military firms in the US, and this is somehow a fault of capitalism. The obvious response to this is that the military-industrial complex is a government-induced phenomenon that likely would not exist with its current power and influence if placed in a free market capitalist society. The MIC is a result of a policy relationship between corporation and state. When the government interferes in the economy enough to create economic sectors to support itself, this is not capitalism, this is socialism. Capitalism is private profits and private losses, not private profits and socialized losses. My opponent then states that the government is spending too much on military products and not enough on social programs and pensions. This is not discussing capitalism, but rather government fiscal policy, which in this case intervenes and redistributes tax money that was forcibly taken from innocent people to be spent largely on government administrations and bureaucracies, while the rest is inefficiently allocated to a permanent underclass and a system of roads that is responsible for 3,240,140 auotomobile accidents in the US alone. My opponent likes to concentrate on the US government and European governments without reference to actual capitalist processes and ideas. [1]Dumb reason #4My opponent states that outsourcing is part of capitalism and bad, because people lose jobs. And that competition in the free market is bad. But, looking at reality, outsourcing isn't a bad thing, even if part of the reason manufacturing jobs are leaving the West is due to too much government interference in the economy, which makes goods and services less expensive in Asia's special economic zones. Furthermore, outsourcing is humanitarian and beneficial; the reason why people in developing countries take jobs that pay very little using western standards is because it is their best option for themselves and their families. "Child labor is necessary in the developing world because given the low productivity of their parents, the alternative is starvation. According to a 1997 UNICEF study, 5,000 to 7,000 Nepalese children turned to prostitution after the US banned that country’s carpet exports in the 1990s, and after the Child Labor Deterrence Act was introduced in the US, an estimated 50,000 children were dismissed from their garment industry jobs in Bangladesh, leaving many to resort to jobs such as 'stone-crushing, street hustling, and prostitution.' The UNICEF study found these alternative jobs “more hazardous and exploitative than garment production. The only way to eradicate child labor is the same as in was eliminated the West – by raising the productivity of adults sufficiently to feed their families." [2]Steve Piraino writes, "Though it sounds nice to say that each laborer's compensation should reflect his needs, the implementation of this view would entail losing all of the benefits of the division of labor. Instead of flowing to those jobs that will produce the most valuable goods for consumers, labor would be allocated according to the politicized vagaries of some kind of official bargaining process. Who would gain under this framework? If the experience of Cuba, North Korea, Soviet Russia, and Communist China is any guide, no one." [3]Finally, competition in capitalism is not like a typical competition in that there are people who lose and people who win. Capitalism makes society more prosperous; people are happier because they are freer, richer, and have the opportunity to pursue a career they love; and science and progress accelerate, adding to the sweetness of it all.Dumb reason #5My opponent describes the use of the Earth's resources as "illegal and immoral." Under the strict property rights that govern free market capitalism, environmental impacts and pollution would be kept into check much more efficiently than the violent monopoly of government can or will. Furthermore, there is no causal mechanism from the system of free market capitalism to environmental killings that has been described by my opponent or any solid evidence that supports this claim.Opponent's RebuttalI have never felt genuinely sad for someone's lack of intellect until this point in my life. I hope my opponent will open a book every once in a while, and may god have mercy on his soul.Conclusion: My opponent has presented zero legimitate reasons to believe capitalism is bad. He misrepresents capitalism, blames government failures on it, and misunderstands even the most fundamental concepts. He has to demonstrate that all the detrimental effects to human life are traceable to capitalism. So far, he has zero out of trillions. We'll see if he manages to break debating code by posting new arguments and evidence in the last round to help his pathetic case.Question to judges: is this a multi-accounter, or is he just stupid?[1] http://wiki.mises.org...[2] http://oneminute.rationalmind.net...[3] http://mises.org...