The Teaching of Safe Sex Education in Public Elementary School

First I am just going to list all of your false assumptions, verbatim (1) Every parent's worst nightmare is not to have a sexually active child, but one who is ridin' dirty with their sexual intercourse, risking pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases that will affect the rest of their lives there is NO SUCH THING AS "safe sex" and there are a number of nightmares as a parent, of which you are not, and sexual activity at a young age at all is one of them, condom or not. (2) Safe sex education is the means and solution to protecting America's children from the immorality of an abortion waiting to happen. Ok what is "safe sex" - please define and how do you avoid the EMOTIONAL aspects as a child too young to understand (3) Judge me not by my age, but by who I am. Maturity has no direct correlation to capable intelligence. this is ridiculous kids have not clue and thats why the drinking age is 21 non-parents have no clue on what it is like to be a parent until you are on your own, have a job, pay rent and have responsibility for your own life, you are a kid and are clueless. period. (4) You use this rhetoric to defend against my arguments, however it holds no factual burden Ok, whatever. you can use fancy words that doesnt mean you have a clue of what it is like to have complete responsibility for other human beings (5) You must elaborate, or this argument becomes a matter of my opinion against yours and nothing is accomplished. A 2005 study by the Guttmacher Institute observed and analyzed the current means of teaching sex education, and criticized them, recommending that they reach a larger age range and promote the means for safe sex. No I Dont. the Public schools, or the government schools, have NO BUSINESS teaching others children about sex, homosexuality, anal sex, "safe" sex or any other topic. This encourages irresponsible behavior. period. the Guttmacher institute promotes abortion. period. they are in the business of promoting evil among the youth through early promiscuity, period. What they say , you should do the opposite Hers is where the EVIL OF YOUR ARGUMENTS LIES (5) As I already asserted in my first round of arguments, the innocence of children has already been destroyed and should not be questioned. WRONG WRONG WRONG AND I WILL NOT LET EVIL PEOPLE TRY AND SEXUALIZE CHILDREN IT IS EVIL > PERIOD. Maybe YOUR innocence was destroyed but most kids HASNT BEEN and should NOT BE. CHILDREN NEED TO BE PROTECTED FROM EVIL. and I WILL DO SO FROM CREEPS WHO WANT THEM CORRUPTED. (6) Sheltering them will only let the "evils" of society teach them more. WRONG! This where you are NOT a parent and have NO CLUE. Oh gee! just give up and let my kid be a slut! WRONG! WRONG ! WRONG ! NEVER NEVER NEVER ! (7) It is these flaws of society, the greedy capitalist means to maximize profits, that are betraying our children, not those handing out free condoms. The average age that a female loses her virginity is 14, and it continues to decrease annually. Now we see more into your corrupted mind . Oh the EVIL capitalists, eh? You are infested with marxist thought, my young friend. You need to get a clue or you will end up down the road of misery (8) Stereotyping and classifying liberal beliefs is a specious assumption that should not be considered valid Wrong. Liberalism is a mental disorder and liberals are generally wrong about everything, particuarly sex and kids. Most of their ideas are either evil or stupid or both. To summarize, you think thje game is over, kids are corrupted, so just go along with it, teach them how to have sex, and give them condoms you are plain and simple WRONG. Kids need to be taught exactly what I said before. period Happy New Year Solarman