The Bible does not contradict itself

I. Allow me to point out that your sources are all Christian sites. .. But there was no "second governorship of Quirinius". From 7/6-4 BC, Varus was governor (Matthew's claim). Quirinius reigned from 6-12 AD (Luke's claim). [1] So Quirinius could not have conducted a census that he couldn't. Also, ". .. no historical sources mention a worldwide or even a Roman-controlled world census which would cover the population as a whole; those of Augustus covered Roman citizens only. .. "[2] And, "it was not the practice in Roman censuses to require people to return to their ancestral homes. "[3], unlike what Luke claims. Also, my opponent has not refuted my latter point, According to Matthew, magis come to worship the newborn king which infuriated King Herod. Luke, on the other hand, describes Jesus being presented to the high priests in honor of the law and the "prophet" and "prophetess" pronounce him as the Messiah. It seems unreasonable that this would not have escaped Herod's memory. [Luke 2:22-38] You still refuse to refute this; therefore, this is a dropped argument. II. II. i. But, the verse clearly says, "The LORD is good to all: and his tender mercies are over all his works. "[Psalm 145:9] He cannot be good to all yet bad to some. You're basically saying that God cannot hurt anyone, but then are saying that he can under certain circumstances. This is clearly a contradiction. II. ii. "The Lord is a man of war. " A soldier. A man who likes war. Man of war: "In sense "soldier". [4] Clearly a man who likes, or at the very least engages in war. "The Lord of peace himself give you peace always. "[2 Thessalonians 3:16] He always gives peace? "He teacheth my hands to war. "[Psalm 18:34] God teaches war. "God is not the author of confusion but of peace. "[1 Corinthans 14:33][5] These are clear contradictions. II. iii. Does, "I will not pity. .. "[Jeremiah 13:14]; "The Lord is very pitiful. .. "[James 5:11]" not sound like a contradiction to you? "Exodus 15:3: The Lord is a man of war; the Lord is His name. Exodus 17:16: for he said, "Because the Lord has sworn: the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation. " Numbers 25:4: Then the Lord said to Moses, "Take all the leaders of the people and hang the offenders before the Lord, out in the sun, that the fierce anger of the Lord may turn away from Israel. " Numbers 32:14: And look! You have risen in your fathers" place, a brood of sinful men, to increase still more the fierce anger of the Lord against Israel. Isaiah 42:13: The Lord shall go forth like a mighty man; He shall stir up His zeal like a man of war. He shall cry out, yes, shout aloud; He shall prevail against His enemies. Romans 15:33: Now the God of peace be with you all. Amen. 2 Corinthians 13:11: Finally, brethren, farewell. Become complete. Be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace; and the God of love and peace will be with you. Multiple Verses: God is omnibenevolent. Exodus, Numbers, and Isaiah say that God is warlike, but Romans and Second Corinthians say that God is peaceful, and multiple verses say that God is omnibenevolent. Contradictions: 1. God is warlike ! = God is peaceful. 2. God is warlike ! = God is omnibenevolent. "[6] III. In a word, yes. Luke is denying the existance of John's claim of Jesus's last words, and Matthew is denying the existance of John's AND Luke's claim of Jesus's last words. John has Jesus giving up the ghost after Matthew and Luke do. All three accounts have Jesus giving different last words. IV. The Bible is the word of God and God is omnipotent [7]. Therefore, the Bible can never be wrong because it is the literal word of God, who is never wrong. But, the Bible contains these scientific errors. How can the Bible be incorrect? The Bible claims truth but delivers falsities. This is a contradiction. This again remains refuted. V. If the Bible has to be "interpreted", then clearly it is the product of some confusion due to the different translations. But, as 1 Corinthians said, God is not the author of confusion. This is a contradiction. " Yet another point that remains refuted. " Sources: [1]:"Sch"rer Emil, Vermes Geza, Millar Fergus, The history of the Jewish people in the age of Jesus Christ (175 B. C. -A. D. 135), Volume I, Edinburgh 1973, p. 243-266 (Survey of the Roman Province of Syria from 63 B. C. to A. D. 70). [2]: Emil Sch"rer (revised by Geza Vermes, Fergus Millar and Matthew Black), The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, Continuum International, 1973, Volume I page 401 [3]:"James Douglas Grant Dunn, Jesus Remembered, p. 344; E. P. Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus, Penguin, 1993, p86 [4]:". http://dictionary.reference.com... [5]:". http://skepticsannotatedbible.com... [6]:". http://straightforward.wikidot.com... [7]:". http://www.parentcompany.com...