religion is false

I take the rules of this group very seriously and I do attempt to put forth the best effort to make sure that I convey the right message to the public. Thank you for your understanding. As I consider my opponent's round four argument, I see some self-refuting statements, like when he wrote, "religion is belief and disbelief" How could religion be belief and disbelief? That's just like me saying, "your heart beats and doesn't beats. " I want to thank my opponent for confirming that their are beliefs that are real when he stated, "the sun is real, life on earth depends on it. ." My opponent also stated, "why not just believe you are god. . if beliefs are true. you seem to have no limit on what is true" (1) Why not believe I' am god? Well, a short personal definition of a god is "what I deem worthy of worship. " I don't think any human beings are gods because of our inability to create universes out of nothing and because of other limitations in our capacity. (2) My opponent stated, "if beliefs are true, I seem to have no limit on what is true? " On the contrary, I do have limit on what is true John 14:6 King James Version (KJV) 6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. According to Biblical theology Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life. My opponent stated, "its like a commen paradox that people dont see they dont know what they believe. . obviusly they dont" Wow! Five spelling errors in one sentence, this is difficult to observe. It may be a paradox to you, but its not a paradox to me. I can't speak for everyone else when my opponent implies, "people don't know what they believe in. " But I do know what I believe in, 1. I believe in God the Father as he is inspiringly revealed in the Holy Bible. 2. I believe that the same God incarnated himself some 2000+ years ago as Jesus Christ. 3. I believe in Jesus Christ, his life, his teachings, his death, his burial, his resurrection, and his ascension. As you can clearly see, this is no paradox to me as I' am convinced of this. My opponent stated, "apples are not holy, they are good," I can agree with my opponent that apples are not holy, but when he implies that they are good, again that is subjective that apples might be good to him, but apples might not be good to someone else. My opponent stated, "i dont have beliefs, know is true. " two more spelling errors in this sentence. Since my opponent refuses to be clear, I' am assuming he is trying to imply that knowledge is true. If he is implying that knowledge is true, then his statement is a oxymoron and self-refuting because he believes that what he know is true. It seems to me that my opponent only trust in his own understanding and logic as he have not cited one single source to validate his claims. I also think my opponent have done a poor job of answering any of my refutations as I have of his so we can conclude that he simply concede many arguments that he didn't addressed. But I ask of him, what do how apples tasting good have to do with why religion is false? His arguments makes no sense to me. I think I have made my points in this round, As I will wait until my opponent make his final round statement, then if God is willing, I will close out this debate with my closing argument. Again I want to thank my opponent for this debate. Source: 1. . https://www.biblegateway.com...