Fox News is the Worst News in the US

Rebuttal 1: "First of all NGOs do not necessarily mean "unbiased". In fact, many NGOs are probably more bias than government organizations. " Forgive me of my arrogance but this is nothing more than a fallacy, I thus extend my argument in regards to Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting and their statistics that show Fox is heavily bias. No statistics makes my point still valid as to why FAIR should be disregarded as a source. In fact, he even uses it in one of his arguments for that matter . .. look at his sources. Rebuttal 2: I would contend that yes News continues into commentary, Fox News has been known to tell lies and bend statistics. Now if you contend that commentary is irrelevant, I think it is, however for the sake of the debate I shall comply with your request and definitions in showing how Fox News is the worst for showing the facts. I shall show this via video (again to the right). . http://www.youtube.com... First video is digital re-imaging that was called out to show more people supported the Republicans, if it was not called out, this would have been ignored. Thus Fox news bended the "facts" in this case. . http://www.youtube.com... Second video -per my opponents request- is an unbiased view of the interview. Clearly O'Reilly lied about him being a conspiracy theorist, and at the end of the video you can see Bill calling for security. Furthermore, he also claimed Bush had nothing to do with the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan . . a blatant lie. But even if this was JUST commentary, it still shows he bended the facts. Furthermore, it makes his point of a 'liberal conspiracy in the press' mute. They told the truth unlike Fox. NOW my opponent will probably maintain that that's just ONE show, and not Fox News. . http://mediamatters.org... (video) Enter the third video(Link above this sentence . . ^^^ right here man! !! ). It shows that according to media matters (Another NGO) That Fox News clearly tried to pull the GOP's research as their own. According to media matters, this is including a typo. Thus again, bending the facts. Source: . http://mediamatters.org... Fourth video JUST to further the point of blunders Fox has made in the so-called facts of theirs. Enter Kevin Jennings, who was accused by Fox for statutory rape with a 15 year old boy. The boy himself told news stations he was actually 16 at that time, thus he was at the age of consent. Again, the boy also told news stations that nothing actually happened anyways. Another blunder by Fox in their attacks against the Obama administration. Source: . http://mediamatters.org... (video) and . http://washingtonindependent.com... Rebuttal 3: My opponent claims the majority of news sources are liberal biasing against conservatives. This is nonsense, in his second source NOTHING shows liberal bias . .. in fact it shows conservative bias after MSNBC fired what appears to be a more liberal oriented person for a more "combative conservative one" . Even more so this may be because my opponent concludes this because of the liberal being fired and FAIR accusing them of suppressing free speech, understandable but mistaken. As they were arguing for free speech because the con states: "I'm warning you if you try to damage me any further with lies, be aware of something: That which you stoke shall come to burn you, the ashes of the fireplace will come and burn your own house down. Be very careful, you are living in incendiary times. You can't just throw things at people and walk away thinking that you had a little fun. I warn you; I'm gonna warn you again, if you harm me and I pray that no harm comes to you, but I can't guarantee that it won't" and Savage, who has called on the government to "arrest the leaders of the antiwar movement" in case of war (Boston Globe, 3/3/03), is in no position to pose as a free-speech martyr. "I'll put you in jail! " was his response to critics of his MSNBC hiring, whom he referred to as "stinking rats who hide in the sewers" Thus a threat of violence, and again as the above quote shows little tolerance of freedom of speech. My opponent is now discredited, he lied to the audience. Even if a liberal tried to pull this crap anyone would have been against him for free speech too! Source: . http://www.fair.org... Rebuttal 4: Actually it DID cause international issues between Canada and the US. Obama is stating an opinion, regardless I agree that would be for another debate. If it did not cause issues Minister of Defence Peter McKay would NOT have commented on it for an apology. (See video) AND, the apology was a joke in it's self. . http://www.youtube.com... . http://www.youtube.com... . http://www.youtube.com... Finally, NO JOKE against the military is funny. What would you say to me if I poked fun at the American Military? Exactly! Final rebuttal: Tabloids are not worse news than Fox news. Here is why: Fox clearly shows a political agenda. In politics the people amongst them comment on issues of life and death, who gets what where, when and why, who gets power, etc. .. Something like the National Enquirer claiming JFK JR moving his wives body as grave robbing is a clear joke. [1] It does not impact the lives of the vast majority of people, nor does anyone take it seriously. THATS entertaining! Source: . http://www.nationalenquirer.com... To recap: my opponent fails to address the accusations against O'Reilly, which means Fox's show is responsible -literally- for death (see round 2) my opponent lied in claiming 'liberal media bias' international relations WERE harmed as a result of Fox tabloids are true entertainment and satirical, NOT mocking the military fox has bended the "facts" 3 times and counting. The BOP has been shown on my part, now hopefully my opponent won't try to deceive anyone through a play on words. FOX is the worst News in the US. Thank You. Over to Con.