A Federal System of Prostitution Should Be Allowed for America's Prisons

1) I don't know. However the possibility of them not having enough funds shouldn't be of issue. Since this would be run by the government, they wouldn't have to set their prices to make a profit, they'd just set prices in a manner that firstly assures the main objective of this proposal and secondly offsets the amount of taxpayer funding that need be put towards this proposal.2) I imagine they'll hire them. Just open up shop and let the interested women wander in. Of course the government can do whatever screening/background checks they need to feel safe in their employment decisions.3) I cannot provide any statistical guarantees, only a guarantee ensured by logic. If you're straight, it is logical that you would choose a woman to deal with (excuse me for this) your horniness before you choose a man. 4) *5) *6) Of course. At least if I had my way.7) Same.8) I assume that the government will not want to be associated with sending women to get raped, so they would try to control these situations as much as possible. So they'd try to make it a controllable situation, and then also have punishments in place if the prostitute reports mistreatment. Even when these countermeasures fail, I would imagine that raping of a prostitute isn't all that common(since they're there for sex), and the rare instances in which it will occur will number much smaller than our current number of prison rapes, therefore making it a worthy trade-off.9) That's how I'm envisioning it. Also, *10) I would advocate that. And if both parties are consenting to the camera observation, is it really a violation? Also, *11) Yes. And state jails. As many places as possible. If there had to be prioritizing, I'd advocate targeting high rape incidence prisons and jails. 12) No criteria. Unless prioritization must be made. In which case refer to the above response.13) This will probably induce a spike in STIs, though I believe there are several things that would keep this to a bearable spike, given the trade-off. First, constant government screening for STIs. Second, protected sex. Prison rape spreads a lot of STIs due to its unprotected nature, protected sex with prostitutes will slow this spread. Third, knowledgeable consent from both parties. Both the prostitute and the prisoner must know the condition of their partner before having sex. The thought with this is that less 'clean' prostitutes will risk getting an STI from a prisoner they know has an STI by simply refusing to have sex with him. To put it colloquially, it'll generally mean the dirties will stay with the dirties, and the clean will go with the clean. If my opponent needs more on this I have another reason, which is substantially longer.14) This gets back to the first question. 15) Perhaps. This will be a system that may need some tweaking at first. If a guy knows there's a light at the end of the tunnel, he may refrain from rape for say, 2 to 4 weeks, because he knows he will get a prostitute. We'll have to see what the case is and change prices and whatnot to compensate for different trends.16) Perhaps not. Perhaps just give their potential prostitutes full knowledge of who they could be banging, and allow them to make the choice. Also, *17) *18) In an earlier question response I stated that this system would not be out to make a profit. So they're not going to bust the prisoners' balls price-wise, and the prostitutes will receive fair pay from the government.19) At first I predict it wouldn't affect anything. But once you get to a generation who has grown up their entire lives with prostitution as a real thing, they may not be so opposed to it being allowed outside of prisons.20) **CONA Proposals shouldn't be written as if they were legislature. They are simply intended to be a general motion towards action. Examples here[1]. If I left an asterisk, it's because I think the question has crossed the line from general plan of action to the kind of details you'd find in an actual bill[2]. If my opponent is truly dissatisfied with this, I will answer his questions to the best of my ability.Christian ValuesWhile it is obviously listed on the site, I can tell you as a firsthand witness and participant of YMCA's mock government programs, that number six bullet never really comes into play. And it's not like these things are Christian camp either. If I recall correctly, only 1 or 2 people out of 70 I was with (at MYIG[3], basically CONA's little brother) actually debated based on religious values. The rest of us acted and talked in a purely secular manner. Just Do It A Different Way"..why don't we deal with the root of the problem through counseling, better protection of the prisoners, more flexible policies to deal with violence, and stricter punishment to rapists?"Trying to fix the rules is ineffective because of the prison atmosphere. The majority of guards simply don't care. Creating a law about what to do about rape and telling the guards to follow it won't work that well, simply because it's down to them to follow through, something that is unlikely to happen with any useful frequency.Sources:[1] http://0101.nccdn.net...[2] http://is0.gaslightmedia.com...[3] http://www.myig.org...