It is Biblically ok for a Christian to raise dogs for food

(I"m a huge Walking Dead fan, so the reference is greatly appreciated) Pro, would it biblically acceptable to poison a population? Assuming that eating dogs is socially acceptable, one can infer that a lot of people would be consuming a lot of dog meat. Millions of people across the country would be eating dog burgers, dog steaks, and dog dogs. In fact, in the Midwest meat accounts for a substantial amount of the individual"s diet. I know some people that have several servings of meat with every meal. So millions and millions of pounds of dog meat would be consumed my millions of America every day. Here"s the thing. There is something called biological magnification. Biological magnification is well established reality pertaining to the food-chain. Dogs, and all canines are what we can an "apex predator". Humans usually don"t eat apex predators. We are hardwired against it. See when a dog consumes its prey, they also consume any toxins in that prey. Let"s say we feed the bulldog protein from a cow. So from the environment the cow eats a small amount of toxins. Accumulating toxins, there is a greater toxin density in the cow then out of the cow. When the dog eats that cow, as well as meat from several other cows, they also consume the toxins that the cow ate, and the toxins become part of the dog. Therefore as it was the cow and grass, there is a higher toxin density in the dog then was in the cow. If we eat the dog, the human eating a doggy sandwich then has a higher toxin density then the dog. Therefore in the food chain, we accumulate more toxins than any other animal. Scavengers as well as other animals, have digestive systems to deal with this type of biological magnification. As humans, our digestive system is created to handle only the second level of biological magnification. We can handle the toxins we accumulate from a cow"s tissue because the toxin density is relatively low, but if you magnify that a third level or fourth level then our digestive system fails to be able to protect us from the poisons we naturally intake from eating other animal"s tissue. So basically by producing dog meat as a viable source of protein for McDonalds, you are really poisoning every costumer that consumes their value meal. Now, given, the effects of eating too high on the food chain could take months or even years to show itself under normal circumstances. However, if an ecological disaster would contaminate any part of the lower food chain, such as the grass, or cattle, that danger would magnify itself. This is what happened to the bald eagle in the 1960"s. DDT did not affect lower food chain animals, but it destroyed the birds of prey. They were higher on the food chain and add in biological magnification, and they almost went extinct. If we were to eat apex predators as a regular protein source we would be plaguing people with dangers that we would know about until it was far too late. And I believe that it is very unchristian to produce, market, and sell anything that puts people"s life at risk is a very wrong thing. And this isn"t a gun, or a car, or something that is obviously dangerous. This is meat. Food should be the safest product on the market, being that it is the product that we as people are so intimately involved with. I believe every eating experience should be safe. By selling people dog meat, you are putting people in a world of danger that they don"t need to be in and should not be in. If you sell people dog meat, you are selling lies. You are making money at the cost of millions of peoples safety. And that is not a biblically sound activity! (Forgive me the splinters in my fingernails. I was forced to scrape the bottom of the barrel)