scientifically inexplicable happenings occur that appear supernatural but almost never to atheists

I will accept this challenge and hope all the best to my opponent. I will begin with rebutting Pro's arguments by stating the following: 1. Pro hasn't demonstrated or provided information as to what would be considered "supernatural", this needs to be defined 2. Pro needs to define what a miracle is which he has not 3. Atheists by definition reject supernatural claims so to request atheists to present a "miracle" is a complete non sequitur Pro states that there are "credible" researchers who consider these unexplained phenomenons as "miracles" and cites the following resources which are unaccredited. The information cited within Wiki simply provides information with regard to what this organization does and shows by it's own admission that it is overseen by those with an already bias toward theology and the supernatural. How can we use that as evidence with regard to the supernatural and miracles? The Christian blog site that Pro refers to has a supposed miracle healer by the name of Kathryn Kuhlman who supposedly cured up to 25 people from serious illnesses. When some of these people were interviewed much later in time to see their progress, it was found out that they weren't healed of anything, some didn't even have the illness that they complained about but rather had something much worse, which wasn't cured. Some of the illnesses returned providing proof to our current medical understanding that at times cancers can go into remission which in some cases happens to people who are younger with great health. So far Pro has only demonstrated that some medical ailments can go away on its own, like cancers going into remission, which is rare, but it does happen. Also, another factor to consider is what is called the placebo effect. In these, also rare occasions, people can be given a placebo drug but told that it is in fact the "good drug" that will help aid or 'cure' their illness. Some have reported, like in the case of people who suffer from depression or irritable bowl syndrome, that the condition healed essentially on it's own, but others they haven't. These supposed miracles that have been researched/documented have shown researchers that these claims are likened to the placebo effect. There are reputable organizations that are willing to put forth the rigorous scientific tests needed in order to prove a supernatural claim to be valid. Organizations such as The James Randi Foundation, are on the front lines accepting any applicants that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that what they do is in fact supernatural with James Randi Foundation willing to award the person(s) up to 1 million dollars. Sadly, none have met the challenge which really leads to a logical conclusion, so far healer claims, personal experiences, are not proof but are simply hearsay. Look forward to Pro's response. Resources: List of reputable medical journals: http://en.wikipedia.org... Kathryn Kuhlman: http://www.quackwatch.com... Cancer remissions: http://www.dailymail.co.uk... http://www.cancer.gov... Placebo effect: http://www.webmd.com... http://www.skepdic.com... James Randi Foundation: http://www.randi.org...