The Proof of the non-existence of God

The Fool says: The Fool knows he is a Fool because he has been fooled so many times before. It is by recognition of his mistakes that the fool becomes a master of Foolery. In this case I mean the art of the recognition of Illusions. The Fool does recognize the popular belief that there is no proof for the existence of God. But what is popular is beside the point. For if the moon is made of cheese, and we believe it to be made of ice-cream it is still made of cheese. E.g. we all belief the earth was flat at one time. But we were all wrong. On Truth For there are many people who claim to know the truth, similarly there are many theories of truth. But a theory of truth could never be the truth for a theory is a lesser claim then the truth itself. But there are some truths that we know for sure, for example the fact that I am experiencing writing this right now is self-evidence by the thought alone. That is the thought is the experience and you could never be wrong about that you had a thought nor experience. In another expression we may say that the truth seems always ahead of us. For when we try and speak for the truth, it is always true that we spoke, but not necessary that we spoke of the truth. But one thing we do know for sure. Is that the truth is the truth and what is not true is not the truth. That is, what is not the truth is false. Thus we have a necessary condition of truth. Which is really just a simple tautology, that is Truth=Truth. But the Fool says: don't be fooled by simplicity. ;) For the truth= is and is synonymous with existence aka something (as appose to nothing) and an, a, the, is, it, entity, concept and 1. Why "1"? Because it follows from anything in particular. For example: 1 car = car or 1 bird = a bird or the bird or the existence of the word or ideas of bird. We could even use math quantifiers: 1*1*1*1*1*1*1*1*car = car similarity pure english a a a a a a a a a a car=car. or a*a*a*a*a=Car etc. It is redundant to add lots of a's but the meaning is the same. And that is what I am demonstrating. And similarly 0 = false , non- existence, illusion, is not,. Why is that? Because it is something which is nothing at the very same time, in the very sense that it appears as something but it's really nothing. Don't be fooled.;) Thus the idea behind the symbol 0 is synonymous with idea of falsehood. That is zero is the enemy. Its appears as something but it is really nothing and this is the very meaning of illusion aka false truth. But I digress, too much teaching not enough Sophist fighting. I might not need this but it may come in handy later. It depends on how much trouble my opponent will give me. The main principle here is what is is: therefore 1=1 but 0 is not or similarly what is not. Even if we try and make it true it is always false. For example 1*1*1*1*1*0=0 similarly a*a*a*0=0 etc. For it is self-evident that the fact that someone has faith is absolutely true by the thought of it. But it is not the case of what they have faith in is true. As demonstrated earlier all the belief in the world doesn't change what is. It might change what it look like(appearance) but never what is actually is. For example we may better trust that something is true because its popular but don't confuse TRUST with TRUTH. For example we may trust a partner not to cheat or lie, but it doesn't cement the fact that it is true. Here we go..Pay close attention. For lets grant our opponent that faith alone is good enough for the truth of the thing we have faith in, in this case god. But the problem is that it then becomes equally true by faith alone that god is false aka not exist. Thus if the truth of god is as true as the truth of the non-existence of god, that is, god is not. More particularly it is(the case) that god is not(the case) that god is true. That is, the truth of god is not true. For let x represent god and the truth be 1. (1*1x) –(1*x)=0 Therefore 1x – 1x = 0 Here is another formulation just for clarity: for let F=faith let G=god let E= existence. For Let Faith be a sufficient condition of the existence of god. Given: 1. F→EG 2. F→~EG 3. F C. (EG&~EG) Yes this is actually REAL and original. (you better quote me if you use my material) End of round 2 for The Fool on The Hill. The Fool says: mind me English is not my second language.