Israel Had a Right To Come Into Existence In 1948

Emil seems to be lacking in the understanding the English language so at the bottom I have provided definitions from the Merriam-Webster for some of the deficiencies in her lexicon. I have words and terms like "Native", "Indigenous" and "Ethnic Cleansing". For example Emil thinks that ethnic cleansing means genocide. Ethnic Cleansing can be accomplished by population removal actions such as the "Trail of Tears" or "Nakba" (https://www.google.com...) Emil claims that the Holy Land has such a name based only on Judaism, Lol, as if the land is not wrought by the collision of different religions. As if other religions do place extremely high value on the importance of this land. Emil would like for you to believe that this debate "Israel Had a Right To Come Into Existence In 1948" means figuratively. We all know that the Romans obliterated the physical state of Israel Milena ago. She plays semantic games on the lack of the word "state". If you believe this debate has anything to do with the existence of Israel in the hearts of Jews then your vote should go to the argument that "Israel has always existed". In honesty we all know that this debate has everything to do with 1948, the U.N. partition plan and the Zionist declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel. Emil would have you believe that the population was so sparse of native Semitic Arab Muslims that the white Zionist illegal Immigrants from Europe combined with the minuscule fraction of native Arab Jews were a majority of the population. Leading to the fallacy that the establishment of Israel was democratic. I will not copy and paste a source for these wildly varying demographic studies. What all honest scholars do agree on is that The Muslims out populated the Jews in both the U.N.'s Jewish partition and the territory loosely claimed by the Zionist declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel. If you do not believe that a strong majority was Muslim I implore you to research it on your own. I am sure you can find a few dishonest "scholars" that would make claims to the contrary but they are few. Few because most people have feelings of honor that they painfully and shamefully have to part from to act with such selfish deception. If you still believe that demographics in 1948 were of a Jewish majority there is nothing I can do to relieve you of your cognitive dissonance. For all of us who can get honest with ourselves and possess the knowledge that the Jews were a minority in the Holy Land in 1948 I will continue. I have read the U.N. resolutions (http://domino.un.org...) (http://domino.un.org...) and am familiar with the vague territorial claims in the "Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel". The U.N. wrote the resolution that framed separation of Palestine with a process that relied on democratic principals to determine the structures of the newly formed states. The U.N. elites knew of the demographic problem even though they were given a terribly flawed census. The elites openly discussed the forced change of demography as a necessity for the formation of a Jewish state. They called it "transfer". Regardless we know that there was an imbalance of Jews to Muslims in these carved out territories to be given to the Jews of the World. So the new Jewish state either cleansed the land of natives or denied the native people democracy. Either way is wrong. Not "Right". They had not a "Right" to create Israel. So when Emil says "Con has failed to demonstrated how these "human rights" come into play and if they were even violated" That is only because her comprehension is poor but I just demonstrated again. It is a violation of Human rights to deny representation in governance and it was clearly a violation of the natives rights when White Jewish Europeans violently forced native brown skinned Semitic people from the villages of their birth. This did happen on a massive scale. Look up "Nakba" (https://www.google.com...). Emil will have you believe that because the people born in this land had not a government of their own and were subjugated by ottomans the Britts that they had no right to democratically control immigration into the land of their birth. Emil even goes so far as to say "It was not "their" territory, rather it was British territory as they formally had control over it" that is cold as ice. Such a statement comes from a heart so cold you could chill a warm beer by holding it to her chest. As if the territory of a populated land is not the territory the native inhabitants of said land....Wow...thats cold. Emil says that Palestinians under Brittish control did not have democracy so that makes it ok for the Zionist army to deny the natives democracy. She is wrong. No one has a right to deny anyone democracy. That reason alone is enough to prove Israel did not a Right To Come Into Existence In 1948. Emil even comically gives effort to gain a vote from the mathematically impaired by saying that both Muslims and Jews were the minority. Emil claims the Holocaust gave the European Jews a right to build homes in the Holy Land. Wrong it was the Europeans who committed the crime of the holocaust so it should have been the Europeans that had land taken from them by the Jews. The offer of a Jewish state in Europe was on the table but between religious freaks and the fact that Europeans were all to glad to have the rest of the Jews emigrate they all dismissed the only righteous idea of carving out a piece of germany for a Jewish homeland. The holocaust did not give its victims the right to immigrate to a foreign land against the wishes of that foreign lands native inhabitants. P.S. Mark Twain was a racist (https://www.google.com...) and P.S. Lord Balfor (Bloody Balfor) and his banker crony Lord Rothschild may have published the Balfore Declaration but so what? These wretched souls of silver spoons with a history of blood thirsty arrogance have opinions of little weight to bear on the hearts of moral men. (https://www.google.com...) Definitions from the merriam-webster 1na"tive "adjective"\G2;nā-tiv: born in a particular place "used to refer to the place where a person was born and raised : belonging to a person since birth or childhood 1 :""inborn,"innate" 2 :" belonging to a particular place by birth 3 archaic":" closely related 4 :" belonging to or associated with one by birth 5 :""natural,"normal 6 a":" grown, produced, or originating in a particular place or in the vicinity:""local b":" living or growing naturally in a particular region":""indigenous in"dig"e"nous "adjective"\in-G2;di-jə-nəs: produced, living, or existing naturally in a particular region or environment 1 :" produced, growing, living, or occurring naturally in a particular region or"environment" " 2 :""innate,"inborn ethnic cleansing Noun (Concise Encyclopedia) The creation of an ethnically homogenous geographic area through the elimination of unwanted ethnic groups by deportation, forcible displacement, or genocide. Ethnic cleansing also has involved attempts to remove physical vestiges of the targeted group in the territory through the destruction and desecration of monuments, cemeteries, and houses of worship. Transfer http://en.wikipedia.org...