TIME CONSTANCY = PROOF of GOD

Ok. My understanding of your argument is that due to the remarkable phenomenon of time being completely constant there is an all powerful being controlling it (unless you specifically mean the Judeo-Christian Deity) My objections: 1. We have a measurement of time that we deem constant but have no means to prove it is constant all the time (how will we know it is not constant if our basis of time measurement is out of our control): The first question coming to mind is your assumption that time is constant. That will segway nicely into the question of how are we sure time is constant? The inevitable answer is that we have no clue. Here's why: our best clocks (most regular) are made by measuring the pulses of Cesium (an atom with a somewhat unstable nucleus that pulses regularly) That being said, we have no control over the small weak interactions taking place in those nuclei, so there is no way we can ensure that these nuclei are actually regular. If they were to be irregular, the pulses happen so quickly it would be impossible to tell, and if there were a significant aberration, we would tend to blame any differences on our own flawed mechanical work. In short, we lack the means to control our methods of timekeeping so we will be unable to identify any irregularities, and thus the entire concept of time being entirely regular already seems unprovable. If it is impossible to prove that time is constant, how can any assumptions of the sort be made? Hence, I have refuted your P2 2. There's no real evidence that a god is what makes time constant (I think your P1 needs more explaining) Enough has been said here, but why would anyone draw the conclusion that some god is what makes time constant (IF it is constant) as opposed to some other phenomenon. (having a better definition of what a god is might help) 3. There is plenty of evidence from modern agreed upon science that would suggest that time needn't be constant. One accurate way to measure time is using the speed of light (it is pretty much impossible to do so by the way, I can elaborate) Light is the defining measure of time when it travels through space. However, Einstein's theory of special relativity would suggest that from different points of view depending on your speed relative to the speed of light, time goes faster or slower. (EXAMPLE HERE: IF YOU ARE SKEPTICAL, READ THIS AND ASK ME TO ELABORATE, IF NO, GO TO THE NEXT PARAGRAPH)For example, let's say that you have a device with two mirrors parallel to each other, and a laser bouncing light between them. You could measure the time it takes for the light to go between the mirrors (obviously there would be small nonconformities because of air molecules getting in the way and such, however it would seem to be fairly constant). Now let's say that you decide to attach some wheels to this apparatus and tether it to the back of the bullet train. A number of things would happen. During the time it takes, for the light departing the laser next to one mirror to get to the other mirror, the second mirror will have advanced some space ahead of where it would be when it was stationary, meaning that the light has to travel further to go from mirror to mirror. (I can include a schematic if you would like) meaning that (from someone moving at the same speed as the bullet train,)each measurement of time (the light traveling) is actually a bit longer, hence time running more slowly, an inconsistency. (you may think that this is cheating, but due to the fact that in YOUR perspective on the train, everything is moving backwards, and the laser beam is going perfectly perpendicular to the two mirrors-- the same exact distance as when you were stationary (again, from your perspective) -- hence the same measurements of distance. However from the perspective of an observer not on the train, the light still has to travel further than when stationary, so the light travels essentially the same distance in more time -- time slows down when you travel quickly. That is all bona fide evidence of time being inconsistent that I can definitely elaborate on or give more examples if you wish. I have proven here that time is inconstant using commonly accepted scientific truth. Obviously if time is inconsistent there can be no such thing as a concrete basis for time constancy, or any god who can create such. My main point here is that time is anything but constant, and there is no real way for us even during perfect circumstances to be sure it is. Even so, there is nothing that suggests that a god would be able to ensure time is constant. To follow the next refutation that you recommended I would need a proper definition of what a god is, just a heads up. In conclusion, your statement is false because time is inconstant and, even if time were constant, there is no evidence or comprehensive definition that would lead us to believe that a god is what would make time run constantly.