CON "I don't know" vs PRO "God did it"

I am going to take a step back from all the minutia of this round and simply look at the debate title. "I don't know" vs "God did it. " If it is true that my opponent doesn't know the origin of the universe, Then he can't tell you that God did not create it. He asserts in the comments section that he doesn't believe in God yet he is taking the position of "I don't know. " Is this not a contradiction? He is claiming not to know the origin of the universe yet making a bare claim that it isn't God. In addition, He doesn't give you a plausible alternative to how the universe came to exist. That is a Prima Facie and they are invalid every single time. Now let's look at his arguments and what they are all trying to tell you. My opponent starts off by saying that abiogenesis is not a theory, It is a hypothesis. Great! It just how ridiculous it is for the majority of people to believe something that hasn't even been tested with much scientific data. My opponents only contention regarding mutualism is that my argument about the wrasse and sweetlips relationship coming about is not evolution. He gives you no link to this argument and even if it were true, He only pushes the question back further. How did the relationship begin otherwise? He said that if you were to spend a few hours studying these species relationship you would figure out how it came about. But again this is simply not true. Otherwise, Mutualism would not be such a big problem to evolutionists today. My opponents arguments concerning this topic are mostly an attempt to make creationists look foolish. P1 Everything that exists has a cause of existence. Explanation: I never asserted it without evidence. I gave clear examples of this and which you have yet to disprove. P2 The universe exists, And thus must have a cause Explanation: See P1 P3 Because nothing cannot produce something, That cause must be an outside force. Explanation: Never in this entire debate have you claimed something can come from nothing. You rather asked me can God come from nothing. To this question I will use the following reasoning p1 everything that has a beginning has a cause p2 the universe had a beginning C the universe had a cause If you ask the question "who created God" you assume p2. That is that God had a beginning. However God is infinite and had no beginning and thus, Did not need a cause. In addition, Einstein's theory of relativity demonstrates that time is linked to matter and space. So time had a beginning and thus had a cause. God, By definition is the creator of the universe and thus, Is the creator of time. God is not bound by his own creation. He isn't bound by time. https://www. Christiancourier. Com/articles/673-who-made-god P4 That outside force is God Explanation: Because I have proven throughout this debate that nothing finite can be the cause of the universe so thus, You have to look to something infinite. The only thing that is infinite is God. P5 God created the universe P6 God exists The other competing explanation for the origin of the universe is the big bang theory. As I said in round 1, There are 4 scientific laws contradict the big bang theory. If you were to believe the big bang theory, 4 scientific laws would have to be false. That doesn't make sense and when something doesn't make sense, It probably isn't true. I have not claimed to be an astro-physicist expert, A biology expert, And a philosophy expert. I have claimed that the fundamentals of these things point to God. I want to end by saying that everyone who puts their faith in science will be disappointed. Science is finite and will fail us. Everything in this life will.