If President Obama is a Good President or Not

The "explicit" tax plans that he proposed and never fufilled is this, Obama's plan gives the biggest cuts to those who make the least, while McCain would give the largest cuts to the very wealthy. For the approximately 147,000 families that make up the top 0.1 percent of the income scale, the difference between the two plans is stark. Yes, Obama offered less taxes to families, but last time I checked,that hasn't happened. To go back to your first statement being "Obama has exceeded expectations as the first African-American president in our history." What makes that good? Just because he is black? Being a good president is not based of of what ethnicity you are, it's about your plans of making a country better than what you started with. To your statement blaming George Bush for the Great Recession. It wasn't even during his presidency.The resulting loss of wealth led to sharp cutbacks in consumer spending. This loss of consumption, combined with the financial market chaos triggered by the bursting of the bubble, also led to a collapse in business investment. As consumer spending and business investment dried up, massive job loss followed. In 2008 and 2009, the U.S. labor market lost 8.4 million jobs, or 6.1% of all payroll employment. This was the most dramatic employment contraction (by far) of any recession since the Great Depression. By comparison, in the deep recession that began in 1981, job loss was 3.1%, or only about half as severe. - See more at: http://stateofworkingamerica.org... As you can see, this had nothing to do with Bush. The resulting loss of wealth led to sharp cutbacks in consumer spending. This loss of consumption, combined with the financial market chaos triggered by the bursting of the bubble, also led to a collapse in business investment. As consumer spending and business investment dried up, massive job loss followed. In 2008 and 2009, the U.S. labor market lost 8.4 million jobs, or 6.1% of all payroll employment. This was the most dramatic employment contraction (by far) of any recession since the Great Depression. By comparison, in the deep recession that began in 1981, job loss was 3.1%, or only about half as severe. - See more at: http://stateofworkingamerica.org... See, Obama has tried to increase jobs, but just can after the deep recession for which he caused. Not only is he a bad president, but he is a liar as well.Perhaps the most significant broken promise of Obama"s stimulus was that it would keep the unemployment rate below 8 percent. This was the promise Obama and White House economists made to sell the stimulus to the public. Had Obama"s projections been a reality, the economy would have recovered to roughly where it had been prior to the 2008 financial crash. Not only did unemployment not stay below 8 Read more at http://rare.us... Another reason is,Reason #19: Largest deficits in history. It should come as no surprise that under a president who sees government as the answer to all of life"s problems that the deficit would skyrocket. Not only did it skyrocket, but Obama has given us the highest U.S. deficits in history: $1.4 trillion, $1.3 trillion, $1.3 trillion, and $1.1 trillion. Breitbart.com"s William Bigelow put these numbers into perspective: "There have never been deficits remotely approaching these; the last year of George W. Bush"s tenure, the deficit was less than half-a-trillion dollars." Read more at http://rare.us... My list of reason can go on forever, but can yours?