No Gods Exist

I will start by showing why your moral argument is both wrong and irrelevant. We'll start with irrelevant. So you say that secular morality doesn't explain morality objectively, But god does. This is false. When you're arguing for Christian morality, What you're actually saying is that God defines morality. This is just God's opinion. His opinion is no different than any other opinion. . So even in Christianity, Your morality would still be subjective, Because it's only an opinion. Now onto why it's also wrong. The truth is, That if objective morality does exist, Then science explains it way better than god. See the problem with the god claim is that it has exactly zero explanatory power. That is to say that while it might be sufficient to account for things, It doesn't actually tell us why or how anything happened. It's exactly the same as if I had said that the moral objectives were created by magic. Sure, Magic accounts for morality, But it doesn't explain it and now I have to explain where the magic came from, So I have more questions now. Now first of all, The word value, Necessarily implies subjectivity, So all moral values are indeed subjective. However, Some moral values, While subjective, Have objective reasoning behind them. These objective reasonings make the acts immoral regardless of opinion and therefore, Have more explanatory power than god. Some examples of these types of actions are: incest, And cannibalism. These actions automatically lead to destruction of the species, Therefore, No animal can participate in them and live, It then logically follows, That everyone living person has to adhere to these values, Because if they didn't, They'd be dead. You say that Christian morality stops people from raping and murdering. But the thing is that rape and murder are universally rejected by the whole of society. Even in countries that don't have god. What really nails down the coffin on biblical morality is that fact that you can't even prove god's existence. This one is painful for you because you're trying to use morality to prove his extistence, When you should be doing it the other way around. Fun fact, Most apologetic arguments use this upstream type of logic where the start at the end of the logic and work backwards. So after taking a look at things. We see that morality actually holds up better under a secular worldview. You said "Now, It is true that Hitler was wrong" Hitler believed in the Christian god, You're not helping your case by brining this up. "If it is true that Martin Luther King was a moral hero because he criticized his own culture by appealing to objective morality, " Martin luther king fought for black rights, But he was also racist against certain black people, This was due to the political landscape at the time. He was ALSO a Christian. All you're proving is that citing biblical morality turns you into a bad person. "Perhaps I may have used the wrong word, But that is the best way I can describe it. " That's cool, But I gave you a better word "formed' that is scientifically accurate to what is actually happening and if you're being intellectually honest, I suggest you use that instead of "came into existence" which adds unnecessary confusion to the argument. So it seems we're on the same page of the bad wording in the premises, So I'll grant the revised wording, Which means the only thing standing in your way is. 1) proving the validity of Premise 2 and 2) showing correlation between your conclusion and the Abrahamic god. Your floor :)