Pascal's Wager Fails to Support Theism

Sadly my third argument was unable to be done due to work. My shifts, as with other things had cut me off. As for my fourth, as explained in the comments, to which the entire unedited argument is, so please go there for it, I also explained that due to late night shifts and a rapid change in my sleep patterns with work, I was unable to finish it, but I was just about to post it when the timer went off. Now I want to make this clear, this is a closing argument. I'm not going to refute anything as that is not the purpose of this argument. This is simply to reiterate my side, and in a more clear view for you to understand, the reader, in order to make my case. CAP in this argument will mean Closing Argument Point. CAP1 -Due to the religions in my past argument, the creation, the very text and laws of the books, none of the religions show to be based around all knowing gods nor follow things based on any science. First off all the Abraham incarnations of the Jewish God do not follow laws an all knowing God would give, but bronze age men. Evidence is pointed to the mythos of Moses. Only 2 are real laws, if anything, and you'd think a all knowing God would say not to rape anyone, all sexes are equal and that what people do sexually is their own, like gay sex and marriage. To be tolerant of other faiths and to not rape or have sex or marry kids. To wait until Age X, when they can logically follow means to do so. Laws are created by men. Which in turn creates your subjective morals. God doesn't once say not to rape little kids or women, and even the NT God with Jesus is still sexist. Laws like murder and stealing were made the same way street fighting, animal abuse, selling humans, sexism, racism, child rape, rape in general, and pedophilia are wrong via most laws. Because we humans come up with them. You have laws on murder being wrong because I don't want to be killed. Matt likely doesn't either. So we create a nation or we rule one and agree to make laws to not kill, thus preventing it by some means. Same with stealing. Laws like you not allowed to shave, work on the sabbath, let women teach men, allow women who are bald to go uncovered, etc are not laws of our time, but bronze ages, and thus is why a book based on all knowing Gods has them. So the probability of that God ever being real as compared to being an agnostic areligious atheist, like me, who takes on the position of neutrality, is more logical because we follow what scientific evidence shows us, that admits being wrong and tries to correct itself, and will change when wrong. As such, following the reality we know based on that is the most logical and is why all other positions, religion or Gods, is not. If you're wrong, you're wrong. You shouldn't wager your life just to save your butt. That's wrong and you know it and any God of modern religion would know that and would not accept you. CAP2- Why does 2+2=4? cause that is what mathematics tells us and we follow it. We don't disagree because of God or religion, we agree because the evidence shows us that two 2's are equal to the number 4. That is the fact of mathematics. As such, as of now, what we know, the brain is responsible for all the souls and spirits claimed to be. The idea spirits exist is silly and there is no evidence for it. So why would you assume they are? It would be best to deny they exist until more sufficient evidence arises, and as such the idea of any religion and God (including afterlife) should follow suit. You won't say otherwise because of religion, and you won't believe some guy on the street saying otherwise while claiming to be God with a book that is proven to be 500 years old written by some arbitrary man who might have write about him, because he really has no proof. Something being archaic doesn't mean it is right by right of age. Follow the evidence, wherever it leads. If you have no evidence, reserve judgement. CAP3 -Do you know why I am comfortable with nothing after death? Because I've come to understand that there is no reason to fear you live once and when you die, everything turns off. I get it, it's scary. I know, because I've had to deal with it for a while now. But you don't need it. We are rational people. You don't need a nightlight to help you find your way through life, especially one that makes the most absurd rules, like not shaving, or a God who created this vast universe (study the universe as I have for college and you will see how massive it is) and that on this one planet, we were the special creation and that this all knowing, all powerful God cares enough to have a book to explain who he is (and this is more specifically to Christianity) and be wrong about almost everything, have no actual science, have a fable of a creation story, and laws that make no sense and actually care about where you stick your male sex organs. And cares enough to test you, when he knows what you think. Punishes you for thoughtcrime. Creates you sick and demands you on pain and suffering to be well again all while demanding you give him thanks for things he did not do. Or that he will give you money or help you win a game that you can't explain, yet won't cure aids, lets babies be born with deformities, like that one in India who had been labeled the Frog Baby and had a liquid brain and had no real life. That cares about what you do and will kill you if you do it, condemns thinking about a girl your neighbor has, which you can't completely control, nor sexual urges, stealing and murder, yet not enough passion to tell his people to not raid villages, make people walk for years based on petty, asinine crimes against him, like worshiping a 'false' god. Or telling his people to not rape other people or marry and or have sex with little kids while giving logical scientific reasons and ordering them not to do it. No, instead he gives basic bronze age rules. There is no way, based on probability, the Christian God is even close to be the most logical of them all. Buddhism is more likely to be a realistic religion than Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. CAP4 -Not only do you have to compete with the 40,000 or so schools of Christianity, and all the preachers teaching people heir interpretation of the book, but you have to compete with: [1]1 Abrahamic religions 1.1 Bábism 1.2 Bahá'í Faith 1.3 Christianity 1.3.1 Other Christian 1.3.2 No-longer-extant Christian groups 1.4 Gnosticism 1.5 Islam 1.5.1 Sufi and Shia Sects 1.6 Druze 1.7 Judaism and related religions 1.8 Black Hebrew Israelites 1.9 Rastafari movement 1.10 Mandaeans and Sabians 1.11 Shabakism2 Indian religions 2.1 Ayyavazhi 2.2 Bhakti movement 2.3 Buddhism 2.4 Din-e Ilahi 2.5 Hinduism 2.6 Jainism 2.7 Meivazhi 2.8 Sikhism3 Iranian religions 3.1 Zoroastrianism 3.2 Gnostic religions 3.3 Bábí movement 3.4 Yazdânism4 East Asian religions 4.1 Confucianism 4.2 Shinto 4.2.1 Shinto-inspired religions 4.3 Taoism 4.3.1 Contemporary Taoism-inspired religions 4.4 Other 4.4.1 Chinese 4.4.2 Korean 4.4.3 Vietnamese5 African diasporic religions6 Mesoamerican religions7 Indigenous traditional religions 7.1 African 7.2 American 7.3 Eurasian 7.4 Oceania/Pacific 7.4.1 Cargo cults8 Historical polytheism 8.1 Ancient Near Eastern 8.2 Indo-European 8.2.1 Hellenistic 8.3 Uralic9 Mysticism and occult 9.1 Esotericism and mysticism 9.1.1 Western mystery tradition 9.2 Occult and magic10 Modern Paganism 10.1 Syncretic 10.2 Ethnic11 New religious movements 11.1 New Thought 11.2 Shinshukyoetc. .. CAP5 & Conclusion -Neutrality (agnostic atheism) is the logical choice to wait for evidence, all while the others claim to have knowledge about something they do not. How can I be sure? Because I do not know and neither do you or does anyone else. Vote Pro. Thank you. Cited Work1) . https://en.wikipedia.org...