The Theory of Evolution is correct

:If you believe evolution is based on science, it is you who does not understand science Me and the actual scientists doing the actual science. I repeat: ToE is the mainstream, consensus, foundational theory of modern Biology. You cannot accept science and reject ToE, unless you assert that you know more about Biology than all the Biologists in the world, and that the overwhelming evidence supports your hypothesis of Magical Poofing. If that is your hypothesis? :I accept real science What is "real science" and how is it different from the actual science done by actual scientists? If you use the scientific method (which is what makes something science) you end up with ToE. : I reject the theory o evolution. Whne they is change to"laws of evolution," get back to me. Scientific theories don't become laws. That's not a thing. As I explained and demonstrated with neutral, scientific sources, in science, A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world.[wiki] :If it was real scince all biologist would accept it as they do other theories that have been proven As with any other scientific theory, there are always a couple of outliers, but basically yes, virtually all Biologists accept this theory. :The vast majority of the scientific community and academia supports evolutionary theory as the only explanation that can fully account for observations in the fields of biology, paleontology, molecular biology, genetics, anthropology, and other [wiki] That is why :The American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general scientific society with more than 130,000 members and over 262 affiliated societies and academies of science including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evolution. the percentage of scientists who support evolution has been estimated by Brian Alters to be about 99.9 percent. To my knowledge there is no scientific support for your Magical Poofing hypothesis. To use your example of "blood type" as something "scientifically proven." " real science can tell you what your type and they can tell you which type will kill you if you have a transfusion." There always remains a small possibility that your test was contaminated, and two different tests could yield different results. That is because science is empirical and inductive, unlike math and formal logic. That's just how science works, and the fact that you cannot grasp this basic scientific concept is just one example of your ignorance and stubbornness on the subject. :Hunches and speculation are not science. Correct. And ToE is neither. It is a well established, mainstream, consensus scientific theory. Which is nothing like a hunch or speculation. :That is the foundation of the ToE, not of biology. Your opinion differs from that of actual Biologists. >When they can tell us what the first life form was and it source Again, if you don't want to be accused of ignorance, don't confuse abiogenesis with evolution. Two different subjects. As I already explained, ToE explains only the diversity of life on earth, not its initial origin. :Let's get real. The events you mention do not operate on scientific principles. What? Everything in the natural world operates on scientific principles. Drought, earthquakes, storms...all common events here on Earth. Now, back to the science. ToE says that new species emerge from existing species by descent with modification plus natural selection. Do you agree, or do I need to provide scientific sources to support this claim? If you agree, I will move on.