ROUND TWO:lf Jesus Was White! He wouldn't Have Been Crucified

Whitesworstnightmare, are you saying that the Hadith are fairy tales? That won't win you any points with your kissy-poo love-dove Muslim friends. But yes, Muhammad was a white-man: http://www.angelfire.com... Jurairi reported: I said to Abu Tufail: Did you see Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him)? He said: Yes, he had a white handsome face. Sahih Muslim 30:5777, See Also Sahih Muslim 30:5786 Know your history. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... Now, according to Muhammad, if you take two white people with wavy hair, and they have a black baby with woolen hair, this is not because the white woman was with a black man. Rather, like camels, it was because sometimes colors just change spontaneously. People are a lot like camels, actually, when you think about it. They spit. They smell. They smoke. According to Islamic lore, the camel is such a prideful jerk because he knows the 100th name of Allah. Humans only know 99 names but the camels knows all 100. So a Camel is not a good example of genetics, but that's what Muhammad said. Yet, the Romans didn't crucify him because he was black. They crucified him because he was trying to get the Romans out of Israel. You really think the Romans care what color he was? No. All they care about is making money. The Roman emperors would kill their own brothers for 15 cents. Know your history. The only race there is is the human race. But there are two divisions of this single race: the oppressor, and the oppressed. Which side are you on, I ask you? Many of the oppressors are white, but think of all their black collaberators. Who is worse --- the devil who looks like you or the devil who doesn't? In Rwanda, one group of blacks hated another group of blacks, and genocide resulted. Think about that for a second. What inspired one to view themselves as superior over another? http://en.wikipedia.org... "The construction of divergent ethnic "Tutsi" and "Hutu" identities was formulated during the era of European colonization from the late 1880s to the 1950s. German colonialism did little to alter the existing stratified social system. The Germans were not interested in disrupting social affairs " their sole concern was the efficient extraction of natural resources and trade of profitable cash crops. Colonial bureaucrats relied heavily on native Tutsi chiefs to maintain order over the Hutu lower classes and collect taxes. Thus, the German affirmation of the stratified social structure was utilized by the Tutsi aristocracy as justification for minority rule over the lower-class Hutu masses. Germany"s defeat in World War I allowed Belgian forces to conquer Rwanda. Belgian involvement in the region was far more intrusive than German administration. In an era of Social Darwinism, European anthropologists claimed to identify a distinct "Hamitic race" that was superior to native "Negroid" populations. Influenced by racialized attitudes, Belgian social scientists declared that the Tutsis, who wielded political control in Rwanda, must be descendants of the Hamites, who shared a purported closer blood line to Europeans. The Belgians concluded that the Tutsis and Hutus composed two fundamentally different ethno-racial groups. Thus, the Belgians viewed the Tutsis as more civilized, superior, but most importantly, more European than the Hutus. This perspective justified placing societal control in the hands of the Tutsis at the expense of the Hutus. Moreover, this Belgian affirmation of the Hamitic theory provided a conceptual foundation for Tutsis and Hutus to start identifying themselves as different ethnic groups. The Belgians established a comprehensive race theory that was to dictate Rwandan society until independence: Tutsi racial superiority and Hutu oppression. The institutionalization of Tutsi and Hutu ethnic divergence was accomplished through administrative, political economic, and educational means." So, here we have an example of colonialists influencing the natives with their white supremacy, and making one group of blacks they viewed as "closest to white" superior, the other inferior. This is the same thing with the Capitalists promoting "light skin" as beautiful and "dark skin" as not. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but if that beholder is a Capitalist pig, he'll distort everyone's visions. He only cares about the money. You know this. Think of it this way: would you rather have a society where blacks and whites viewed eachother as complete equals and lived in economic and social harmony, or a society where there were only blacks, and one group oppressed and enslaved the other group? Clearly, you would want the first society, regardless of so-called "race". So the real enemy is not race, it is oppression --- and it can take cultural, economic, social or religious forms. But it always has the same face: inequality. So you and your anti-white stance are merely reversing the inherently oppressive nature of the predominantly white Capitalist apparatus. And should all your dreams succeed with this attitude, all you will do is replace one oppressor for another. What color did Jesus think of himself? That is what matters. He said, "Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me." (Matthew 25:40) If a woman or man is mistreated, marginalized, raped, murdered, enslaved or abuse because of skin color, then Jesus considers himself as that skin color. And it is that sort of thinking that breaks the chains of Capitalist-pig oppression, not your concern for skin color. Now I see you playing kissy-poo with the Saudi Arabians, like they're not worse than the KKK in terms of white supremacy. You need to educate yourself and quit trying to please the oppressor, wherever he lives. http://wikiislam.net... http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com... Black pugs and white pugs get along fine. So white and black people can get along fine. But we can't do that until there are no more bosses, no more kings, no more classes, no more concern for race. http://www.youtube.com... You playing kissy-poo with the Muslim slave masters is a lot like you playing kissy-poo with this reverse-Colonialist mindset. You know you'd rather have a white friend and equal over a black tyrant, so forget about this nonsense. He or she could be whiter than Christmas, but if they're for you, and identify your pain as their own, that's all that matters. Quit playing kissy-poo with all these masters and manipulator-mind sets. You may see you're against the lightening of the skin, but if the whites are the predominant oppressors and use racial division as a weapon, aren't you lightening your mind when you start getting all hot and bothered about what color Jesus is, or Moses, or Confucius, or Akhnaten, Santa Claus, Johnny Cash, Kris Kristoffersen, Waylen Jennings, John Belushi, the Blues Brothers, Ray Charles, Richard Pryor, Sam Cooke, Rodney Dangerfield, Red Fox, the UFO aliens, the submarine Aliens, the subterranean aliens, intergalactic cats, giant mouses with lazers shooting out of their eyes, the Pokemonsters, Gremlins I & II, Critters I-X, Tremors, the Leprachaun, Alien vs Predator? Think of the pugs. Vote Cropononopon.