Science cannot explain everything

“In the bible (Mat 24:6-7) states that "You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come". Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places.” == What I take it you are trying to do is claim that Science cannot explain how these “prophecies” came true. In this case, it is hardly a prophecy. I could claim, right now, that within the next couple thousand years, people will go to war, famines will happen, and there will be earthquakes. If any of those happened within that time frame, should I be considered a testament against science? No. All of those are things that are, on the time-scale we are talking here, relatively frequent. In regards to wars, there are theories that they operate on cycles, making them somewhat predictable [http://en.wikipedia.org...]. The risk of a famine occurring can also be discovered [http://www.who.int...]. Even earthquakes have a level of scientific predictability [http://www.infoplease.com...]. == “Another prophesy from the bible that came true. Mat 24:24 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.” == So he predicted people would say false things about religion? And this defies scientific explanation how, exactly? == “There are lot of prophesies in the bible that already happen in our times. If you believe only in science you will lost everything that you have when Christ will judge you. but you still have time to change your mind...” == While I don’t believe in religion personally, a critical mistake you are making is creating a void between science and religion. Science and religion don’t have to disagree. What does science being capable of explaining everything have to do with your religious beliefs? Because you can explain the existence of your God does not mean it cannot exist. == “Those prophesies science cannot explain why there are many religions today and also anti-Christ like you!” == Science can, actually, explain religion. Early humans had not developed scientific methods to help them understand the world. Instead, they made stories and explanations that fit their needs. As science developed, many people realized its importance and the absurdness of various religious aspects. Meanwhile, people don’t like new ideas (It is harder for new ideas to replace older ideas, no matter how out-dated they may be) and prefer to cling to the more religious beliefs. But, again, science and religion don’t have to exist as separate entities. == “What is the reason why there are many Christian denominations in the world today compare to the 1st century until 10th century?” == Population growth mostly. If a person’s parents where Christian, then their children are very likely to be Christian. As more and more Christians are born, there will always be deviation in belief, as people have different experiences that shape how they view things. These deviations, given enough time, grow into groups and denominations. Cultural influences are a big part, as well as the moral and ethical “climate” of the world given the time period. You could view it as Religious Evolution. == “Why there are more records of earthquakes from 19th century up to this time compare to 1st century until 10th century?” == Various reasons actually. Population was a lot lower and less spread back then, so earthquakes could have been happening in different parts of the world that went completely unnoticed. Furthermore, we are far more populous now, with sensory equipment designed with the sole intent of recording earthquakes, making it virtually impossible for one to go by unnoticed. Also, with the advent of seismology, computers, and science in general, we keep far more accurate records than those of the first 10 centuries. I hope I answered your questions adequately.