The User Known As "Bluesteel" is a girl

First, presume aff because: a) I've been a member of the site for far longer than my opponent has, and have known bluesteel for far longer than he has, so am a far better authority on whether or not bluesteel is a guy or girl than my opponent. If the debate is tied at the end you vote aff since I'm more likely to be right from personal experience and knowledge. b) I've been in G+ hangout sessions with bluesteel and have seen her with her webcam on, therefore have eyewitness testimony that my opponent lacks. If the debate is tied you prefer my eyewitness testimony over my opponent's lackthereof. Contention One: User vs. PersonThe debate is over whether or not the user known as 'bluesteel' is a girl or not. Why does that matter? Because userhood is distinct from personhood in that it's an entirely digitally constructed identity. The anonymity of the internet has empowered internet users to construct identities that can be entirely fictional from their real life identities. There's two reasons to disassociate real life identities from user identities: First, multiple users can have access to a single account, making the only static identity associated with the website the user. A user account cannot be both a guy and a girl at the same time, as that runs contrary to understandings of biological gender, without which identification of gender becomes impossible objectively. Second, one person can hold multiple different accounts simultaneously, making the only logical distinction to make on a user-by-user basis being the user itself and not the person. Ontologically, the splitting of a person to share multiple different accounts is nonsense, as each account may have a distinct persona, speech, beliefs, mannerisms, etc, that make that distinct user a distinct individual. This makes the debate super simple because if I'm winning this part of the debate, all I need to prove that the user known as bluesteel is a girl is to reference her profile to show where she identifies as a female. Since her profile clearly marks her as having selected the female gender, the resolution is affirmed.Contention Two: Inter-user relations I'll outline this argument in the form of a syllogism. I do this because it makes the argument a lot clearer and simplistic. To warrant the conclusion of a syllogism, I must simply prove all of the premises I use to arrive at that conclusion. If all the premises are true, then the conclusion must logically be true. P1. The user known as Mikal is a guy.P2. The user known as Mikal is heterosexualP3. The users Mikal and bluesteel were in a romantic/sexual relationship.C. By definition of heterosexuality, bluesteel must be a girl. Now to justify the premises:Premise 1: This one is simple enough. Not only does Mikal's profile indicate that he is a guy (http://www.debate.org...) but he has photos of himself posted publicly on his profile (http://www.debate.org...) that verify his identity as a guy. Premise 2: Mikal's profile indicates that he's interested in women, meaning that he's heterosexual. In addition, Mikal has publicly stated that he is of heterosexual identity (can be viewed in the comments on my profile http://www.debate.org...), meaning that this premise is by default true. Premise 3: Not only have there been threads saying that Mikal and bluesteel were in a romantic/sexual relationship (http://www.debate.org...), but it's been rumored that there are also secret sources (partially divulged by bhu2001) confirming that they were, in fact, in a relationship. After a little digging, I discovered the identity of the source and asked for confirmation. To protect the identity of the anonymous source, I edited the picture to black out usernames (http://i1179.photobucket.com...). This confirms that bluesteel and Mikal were in a heterosexual relationship.Conclusion: Since heterosexual by definition means people of opposite gender, and Mikal is a guy, bluesteel by default must be a girl. The resolution becomes affirmed.