The God of the Bible Could Potentially Exist

My opponent's first statement in his "Framework" section is correct, in that if he can prove even a minor possibility, he will win. However, that does not make my task impossible. I have demonstrated a method by which I can prove my position: by showing that the entity in question is, by definition, contradictory. Please note that my goal is not to disprove all deities, but one deity in particular: the deity described by the Bible. And, as the Bible is the only document which can provide a definition for the god in question, if I can show that the Bible's definition of "god" is contradictory, I can prove that the Biblical god cannot exist. My argument is rooted in semantics only in that it is concerned with the definition of god as given in the Bible. If my opponent is going to claim that my task is impossible, I would first like him to either show that my method of logically proving non-existence is flawed, or that I have failed to adequately accomplish the requirements of my method. As he has chosen to dispute my evidence, I would assume he is taking the latter approach.My opponent does not seem to believe that the quoted verses represent contradictions, and has presented arguments to that effect. I have a few issues with his attempts at refutation.1) The Extent of the Biblical God's Power Hebrews 6:18- If you are suggesting that god defies logical understanding, I must ask why you are participating in a debate which was clearly meant to follow a logical framework in discussing this issue. I would also like to ask that you provide some explanation as to how something can defy logic and still be considered to be coherent or existent.- For a being to be considered "all powerful", it must be able to do anything. Without the ability to lie (or to sin, which you also claim is impossible for god), a being cannot be rightly considered "all-powerful" as it clearly lacks a particular ability. This still represents a contradiction. Beyond that, there are instances in the Bible in which god clearly lies or claims the ability to lie. Take for example Ezekiel 14:9 - "And if a prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the Lord have deceived that prophet." This would represent another contradiction with Hebrews 6:18.Judges 1:19- I would like to request that, if my opponent wishes to cite translation error as a refutation of a contradiction, he provide an alternate translation, complete with the relevant passages in English and the language in which the passage was originally written (in this case, the Hebrew text will do). I would also request that my opponent provide a compelling argument as to why his translation better represents the meaning of the original passage. It is far too easy to just say that a contradiction is a result of a translation error; I am simply requesting evidence to support this claim.2) Extent of the Biblical God's KnowledgeGenesis 3:8-9- Here is the verse in context: 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. 3:8 And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden. 3:9 And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? 3:10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself. 3:11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? 3:12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. I have put the verse in question in bold, and done the same to two more questions asked by the Biblical god immediately after, which again show an apparent lack of knowledge. I would like to ask my opponent to please explain how it is he came to the conclusion that the original verse was a rhetorical question, as I, with my apparently inferior level of comprehension, do not see any reason to believe that the question is rhetorical. I would also ask my opponent to explain the Biblical god's other questions, as they too seem to show a limitation in knowledge. So far as I can see, there is still a contradiction between this passage and the claims to the Biblical god's omniscience.Hosea 8:4I will give this one to my opponent. While I am not completely convinced that his analysis is correct, I will concede that there is potential for this verse to mean what my opponent claims, and as such I will drop the question of Hosea 8:4.Thoughts on My Opponent's Conclusions- My arguments are based on semantic interpretations only in that I am relying on the Biblical definition of god, and the words used to describe the Biblical god contradict each other numerous times.- The only way a deity can be considered to be the "Biblical god" is if the deity in question matches the definition of "god" given in the Bible. If the definition of the Biblical god is inherently contradictory, then the Biblical god cannot logically exist. I am not trying to disprove all deities, but rather the specific deity described in the Bible.I would like to assure anyone reading this debate that the mechanics of this site have not changed. It is entirely possible for you to vote Con. And I would like to ask that my opponent not attempt to claim victory until all the arguments have been presented.