Play Devil's Advocate--Once more!

Fanath had forfeited. I, extend arguments and intend to focus and prove the hardest thing possible this round: Homosexuality is actually WRONG. That's right. Why not? You may ask. There is no gay gene. [1] Shows that homo's aren't born gay, they have a choice.If it is a choice, then why can it be okay? Once again, arguing for other marriages would not turn to be a fallacy but an actual working slippery slope. People could argue that bestial or incestuous relationships are "okay" now that gay is "okay". But this is only because they think they are born gay, while this is not the case. You can choose who to love and who not to love. Now, my opponent will probably say "Well even (other) animals have homosexual acts", this is a Straw Man, since other animals' rights have no relation to our rights. The black widow spider kills its husband after mating[2], and male ducks are known for raping female ducks[3]. Is this alright in our society as well? Of course not. Thus if my opponent tries to say that homosexuality is natural, it is definitely NOT natural.My opponent will probably examine my argument closely and go "well the government can't limit these people's choices, even if they're only choices". But then, why do we hate bestial or incestuous relationships? Once again, with the slippery slope, either we illegalize everything or legalize everything; they are too closely related and advocates will connect them together, putting pressure on the government to try to legalize what is considered "terrible" and "wrong" by most people. Gay doesn't harm anyone?? My opponent will probably say "well unlike bestial or incestuous, homos are human beings and won't harm each other like beasts or insects". This is a good comparison and seperates the gay from beasts and insects, however, although homosexuals won't harm physically, many basic ethics such as integrity and modesty would be gone. Similarly, nudity does not harm others psysically, however, you are still considered a whore and it is still immoral by public law, and the same thing applies to necrophilia and bestiality. Every society has these ethics, and even if they are a bit weak, they still exist. Homosexuality is WRONG!!As our infamous Ajab (Now Ajabi) states so: "...the difference between a sexual relation and a platonic relation: the answer is sex. Sex here means any activity which has a sexual motive: from hugging to engaging in coitus....feelings such as love, acceptance, trust, support are in a relationship of a mother and her offspring..the only proper, rational difference betwixt a platonic and a sexual relationship is the sex we maycontinue. ...there is such a thing as lust. Lust here being the active desire to engage in sexual contact, be it betwixt homosexuals or heterosexuals. ....those who believe in God would be that an infinitely just and good God would not endow humanity with lust unless there was a purpose: the only rational purpose of sex is reproduction, for God would only give humanity lust so it may continue its existence. This goes in perfectly with the evolutionary theory (the second way to look at it). From history we know (if you believe in evolution, if you do not then you must believe in Creationism or Intelligent Design which would justify the first part) that the brain has evolved. ...in the simplest of words evolution ensures that we come from no system to a better one. Such is it that the qualities which are important we keep, those which arent we dispose. Also as the cortex seems to evolve, emotions seem to decrease. As we become more rational individuals we give less precedence to emotions... why would we continue to have lust? If the rational grounding of lust is not in reproduction and in pleasure then why would evolution not make it redundant? It seems to have stayed coherent within us.... lust.... is an instinct. And the instinct has its grounding in reproduction...the grounding is in reproduction then sex is only moral when done for reproduction and not for pleasure, making homosexuality immoral. The only justification for marriage is to make a family. If you look at it in a different less logical way even then you realize that sex makes a person barbaric, far from evolving a person it takes man and woman to their lowest points." [4] [1] http://www.onenewsnow.com...[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...[3] http://www.newscientist.com...[4] http://www.debate.org...