Theoretically, It is possible to Divide by Zero

Firstly, in order to correct your understandings: Dividing x/0 = y would mean x*y = 0 which is impossible when given actual values.(x / 2 = y)10 / 2 = 5But...(x * y = 2?)10 * 5 = 50I did not say that the denominator was 2, I said if the denominator was 0,If we continue with the correct denominator:5/0=∞;∞*0 = 5See? In this case, there is no possible way for the previous equation to be true. Anything, even ∞ multiplied with 0 is still 0. This is not a valid equation.Thirdly, Division is repeated subtraction, and it doesn't work with division of zero. Actually, I have not proven your point. 15/0=0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0....,"Since you would keep adding zero forever, you will never reach the end, therefore you can conclude the answer is an infinity". The problem with your statement is that even if you add zero forever, you will never reach the end because there is no way to end it. There will be no change, it does not approach anything. You have to understand that 0 is nothing, adding nothing to nothing is still nothing. I personally have never used the term "never ending" when referring to 15"0=0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0...., I had to show that even if you continued, it is impossible. Specifically, I have said "This is impossible to complete because no matter how many 0's you add, you will never reach 15 which is another reason why it is impossible to complete a division by 0." I have clearly stated "you will never reach 15" and that's because it just isn't possible or "undefined".In the previous examples that I have done,15"5 = 5+5+5, and 15"3= 3+3+3+3+3, the numbers add up. 5+5+5 = 15, 3+3+3+3+3 = 15. This is why the equation is true in both theory and practice. However, with your thinking, even if you add an infinite amount of 0's, the numbers will still not add up, 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0......+0+0≠15 no matter how many 0's you add. This is not a matter of "because it doesn't end, it is infinity." That is why everyone knows there is a difference between "never" and "in a while". 0+0+0+0+0 will never yield the total of 15 or any number other than 0. 0+0+0+0+0 will not yield the total of 15 just because you add 0 for a few thousand years or even infinity. You have to understand that it's just not possible.15/3= 3+3+3+3+3You add 3 five times, therefore the answer is 5.15/5 = 5+5+5You add 5 three times, therefore the answer is 3.15/0 = 0+0+0+0+0,You add 0 but it is not infinity because no matter what number of zeros, even ∞, you still won't arrive at 15. So the conclusion we arrive at is :there is NO number of 0's in which you can add to 0 in order to make 0 turn into zero. This is why it is safe to say it is undefined (no number possible).And finally we can say that the number of 0's required to get from 0 to 15 is undefined, because there is no number which does so.Fourthly, the fallacy is completely relevant. Without the impossibility of dividing by zero, using that procedure, we proved that 1=2. The only reason of why 1 does not equal 2 in the mathematical universe is because you cannot possibly divide by zero, shown in the mathematical fallacy. Can you find another reason why 1 would not equal 2? No because the sole reason is because you cannot divide by 0.Now, Logical : adjective \;l"-ji-kəl\1.Capable of reasoning or of using reason in an orderly cogent fashion2.Based on earlier or otherwise known statements, events, or conditions; reasonable3.Reasoning or capable of reasoning in a clear and consistent manner.Sources :http://www.thefreedictionary.com...http://dictionary.reference.com...http://www.merriam-webster.com...Now, just because it is logical (reasonable), it does not mean it is possible in theory. All that I have said is that your evidence was thought out and understandable. It could still be right or wrong, and in this case, your theory is wrong. That is why it not possible, even in theory. In the beginning you said that 0 is impossible to completely reach. But later on you said : "5 /∞ =0Than...5 / 0 =∞"To summarize, this was all that your theory consisted of. Put in simpler terms, "because we assume 5 /∞ =0, we can assume that using basic algebra, 5 / 0 =∞".But you have stated that reaching 0 is impossible in your first few paragraphs, as I have stated in round 2. How could 5 /∞ =0 in your own theory if you yourself said that "it's impossible to reach Zero without jumping numbers, is that counting down, you will find yourself counting forever"?I would like to remind you that I have completely rebutted against your points. Refer back to my round 2 argument where I say: "First off, I would like to bring up a contradiction in your theory. You said that"Zero is can't be reached, because unlike the other Whole Numbers, it's amount is infinitely small". Then, in the second part of your theory, you said that"5/∞=0", now isn't that a bit contradicting?" and the entire paragraph after that.My 4th argument could be ignored but there is still irrefutable evidence against you.