BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Is love money or sex better

Well lets see, first of all making love is still counted as love. That's the best experience you get when you can be in so love with a person you don't call it sex no more. Basically because when your in love you don't think about just rough sex you think expressing your love in a deeper way then sex. And If money is your love so be it but sex cannot, money however can buy sex not love. As you see what I am saying is that love is one of a kind something that you can't buy, & money is not good without love in your life! WHERE THERE IS LOVE THERE IS LIFE- MAHATMA GAHNDI
Objective Morality is not God's Work

This is a topic that never ceases to thrill me and I would love to share it with someone with an equally interested mind. I'm sure you've been through the run of the mill with the subjective v. objective debate and so this should offer a new look at things. My argument: Objective morality exists as our means of determining that which is best for our survival. God: an undefinable entity. Morality: a sense of duty in distinguishing between good actions and bad actions, where a good action is anything that promotes the individual's interests and the bad anything that goes against I suspect that my definitions may not sit well with most people and your R1 response should thus include any concerns that you may have. Any further clarifications that you would like to make should be made in R1 as well. I've categorized the question as one of philosophy but religious inquiries are more than welcome.
Lil Wayne Is The Best Rapper ALIVE

First off, Lil Wayne in 30 years old. But that is besides the point. Sure Lil Wayne has good lyrics and is one of the most popular rappers out, but he is not the best. This debate is entirely based off of opinion and there is nearly zero factual evidence you can use to back up your argument. If you want to go by album sales, that would make Diddy the greatest rapper of all time and i don't think either of us agree with that. All i can say to support my case is some of Lil Wayne's God awful songs like any song off of "Rebirth" or the song "How to Love", these songs in my eyes are the epitome of bad music.
Lil Wayne Is The Best Rapper ALIVE

Lil Wayne is the best rapper alive. his Mix tapes Some of Wayne"s best content has been on the mixtapes that he releases. Da Drought, Dedication, etc. All those were hot as hell.He"s already famous What"s it matter whether or not Weezy is the best rapper alive right now? He"s only 26! If Jay-Z can be a 40 year old rapper, then Weezy has at least 15 more years left to claim the crown. I"m sure he will do it within that time frame.
Lil Wayne Is The Best Rapper ALIVE

Lil Wayne was literally raised by hip-hop. He was signed with Cash Money by 12 years-old, and touring at 14. He invented the term Bling, And even saying lil wayne the best rapper Alive is not even a debatable topic anymore in the rap business after his album sales..and on http://www.aceshowbiz.com... it shows multiple awards he has won
Lil Wayne Is The Best Rapper ALIVE

Backing up his album sales is just proving my point, which was not clear before. What I am saying is that Lil Wayne can sell more albums than Elvis, The Beatles, and every other artist combined but it still does not necessarily make him the best rapper alive. Proclaiming anyone as the bet rapper is purely an opinion, you might think it's Wayne, and someone else might think it's Waka Flocka, there is no way to say either is right or wrong. And on the part of Lil Wayne's album sales, multiple reports say that Birdman purchased thousands to possibly millions of copies of Tha Carter IV, whether or not that is true, there is a grey area surrounding his sales.
Lil Wayne Is The Best Rapper ALIVE

OK Thanks for correcting his age for me. now to the point about album sales, Wayne's album Tha Carter III sold 1 million copies in it's first week of release even though it leaked and The Carter IV sold just under a million after it leaked to.And his Hit song how to love is one of the top selling tracks out there, And time great Stevie wonder loved the song. And all the songs on rebirth were bad how about drop the world which was number 1 on the billboard for 3 weeks straight. and according to MTV.com Lil Wayne Breaks Elvis' Billboard Record Weezy racks up most chart appearances on Hot 100 with 109.
HJHS vs DRJHS

Some of those i agree with but we also have nice teachers, barely allow discrimination, and we have the same amount of opportunities as DRJHS. Some of the classes let us get to do homework or play games for amount of time. We also get to use our phones too. We get listen to our music when we are working or doing PE activities like some of the sports that we do or run a mile. We get to talk to our friends while we are working on an assignment. Also DRJHS is aggressive in the athletic department unlike HJHS we play fair and square.
HJHS vs DRJHS

Reasons why DRHS is better than HJHS1.We can chew gum here 2. We got super nice teachers 3. No 9th hour4. You can choose more classes5. There are more field trips, some even outside of Arizona6. We are allowed and encouraged to use our phones (Remind 101)7. More food options8. Less rules 9. Teachers dont bug you about your grades anymore (Cuz' that is you own responsibility now!)10. It's High School AND LET THE VOTERS TAKE A MOMENT TO REALISE THAT PRO ACTUALLY GOES TO DRHS! NOT HJHS!Back to you "Armysoul88".
Metapod would beat Magicarp

Any pokemon can beat any pokemon using the focus sash, flail technique. Also metapod can only have harden in it's moveset meaning even just using flail on full hp it would eventually die of running out of pp as magikarp could use both splash and flail to keep itself occupied. This means technically metapod could never beat magikarp as it has no damage dealing moves and it's pp would run out.
Messi is better than Ronaldo

From 2009 onwards, Messi has turned into a footballing "god". Ballon d"Or winner in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012".that"s four. Four consecutive Ballon d"Or awards. Champions League top scorer 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. La Liga Player of the Year 2009, 2010 and 2011. UEFA Best Player in Europe award in 2011. He"s scored more than 40 goals every season since 2009. The list goes on. More recently, 91 goals in a calendar year, not many, in fact only one other player can boast of that. A phenomenal achievement, by a phenomenal player. Lionel Messi isn"t as muscular as Ronaldo. He"s not too bothered about how he looks. Maybe his weaker foot isn"t as good as Ronaldo"s, but who needs to use their weaker foot when they can chip the keeper from four yards anyway? His free kicks are as good as Ronaldo"s. He glides past players like they"re not even there. Likening him to Maradona is a sin, he"s even better. Watching him play is unreal. All you can do is sit there with your mouth wide open and admire. He is every inch as good as Ronaldo, if not better.
Messi is better than Ronaldo

One of the things aside from honors and stats, that also speaks in Messi's favour: Is the fact that he's a hundred billion times more reliable than Christiano, no matter what way a game is going, Messi will always be seen doing his best, players will continuously tackle him but he still gets up, even with a smile on his face no matter how much punishment he receives and believe me when I say I've seen him take some pretty nasty tackles. Apply the same scenarios to Ronaldo, he's good when he's winning, but when things starts going against him he breaks down entirely, will start looking for fake fouls and become even more of a deva than he generally is often putting his team even further back. You can barely touch Christiano without making him "fly like a leaf" and he'll also most probably cry baby deluxe for 5 minutes as well wasting major play time to boot. I can't stand him, a despicable player with weak team-mentality who'll rather take a bad shot and miss than pass the ball to his teammates that are 99% of the times in better position. And no, his great technique, stamina and speed (which also are inferior to Messis) do not make up for his obvious lack of team orientation and weak mentality. Lastly, anyone who believes he is on par with or better than Messi is clearly delusional. Christiano don't even come close.
Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning

I can certainly agree with you, Tom Brady is an excellent quarterback who deserves the accolades he has won in his career. Indeed, he may even become a top 20 player of all time before he is done. However, before you get a swollen head, remember that Peyton Manning is already a top 10 player of all time in numerous rankings. Let me first show you that your claims are irrelevant at best and downright inaccurate at worst. You state that Peyton Manning has been throwing to all-star receivers during his entire career. Of course, I have to concede the fact that Peyton had Marvin Harrison at the beginning of his career, an excellent receiver. However, in recent years, Tom Brady has had far better receivers come to him. In the past couple of years, Tom has received both Deion Branch and Randy Moss, receivers that had made their names before they arrived in Boston. He was also blessed with Wes Welker, a player widely regarded as one of the most sure-handed players in the league. Peyton Manning has taken no-name receivers such as Reggie Wayne, Pierre Garcon, and Anthony Gonzalez and made them great thanks to his amazing abilities to read defenses. On another note, NFL experts recently named the New England Patriots the #1 offensive line in the NFL, while only one Colt (Jeff Saturday) received any commendation. Grey Ruegamer once claimed that the "game is won in the trenches", and the Patriots make that obvious. Before Tom Brady earned a chance to play, the Patriots were already considered contenders for the Super Bowl under star Drew Bledsoe. Tom Brady took a team with high expectations and reached those expectations. On the other side, the Colts had not been contenders since the early 1980's when they were in Baltimore. Indeed, Peyton Manning came to a team which was 3-13 in their first season to 13-3 their second. He is a game changer, raises the abilities of his teammates, and has been and will remain a much better Quarterback and player than Tom Brady.
Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning

Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning, and yet Peyton has had all-star wide receivers since he started. Tom has only had one since 2007, and look how his stats lit up. 18-1 (best record in nfl history) 50 passing touchdowns in a season (most in a season, also he had to pas Peyton for that record). Peyton has five seasons on Brady. Two for when Brady was in college. Two for when Brady was benched and one for when Brady got hurt for a season, with only 76 passing yards.
Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning

I really wish I had the characters to refute all of the claims made in your links, but I do not, so let me simply tell our audience one simple fact. Both of the links my opponent just put up are written by the exact same man, editor of the cold hard football facts, Kerry J. Byrne. Honestly, you can make any claim from man not landing on the moon, the Holocaust being fake, or even Tom Brady being the better player. All ridiculous claims, but you can find at least one other person who shares your view. No, but it stands to reason the better player will be remembered by his stats and accomplishments. Tom Brady cannot catch Peyton Manning, especially considering Peyton has higher stats nearly 75% of the time. I was simply remarking that stats are a poor point of contention for you considering that Peyton has the advantage in it by a mile. Yes, Peyton wins many MVP awards, the most in history in fact. He has been named the best player in the country more than any other person in the history of the sport. I disagree with your logic about Super Bowls. Even the best quarterback cannot win a super bowl without a great supporting cast. By your logic, you are saying that Len Dawson, Terry Bradshaw, and Bob Griese are all head and shoulders above players such as Dan Marino. I doubt you'll find much support in that argument. Let me quote a final link for you. http://nbcsports.msnbc.com... NBC reporters asked the 20 living Hall of Fame Quarterbacks who they would start between Peyton Manning and Tom Brady. The Quarterbacks voted for Peyton Manning by an enormous margin, 13ï¿½-2ï¿½, with four abstaining. Now, I think of myself as a very knowledgeable fan. However, my football knowledge pales in comparison to these 20 men. The greatest quarterbacks of all time voted in a landslide for Peyton Manning. That, in addition to Peyton's recent ESPN ranking as the third best QB of all time proves my point. Tom Brady is excellent. But Peyton Manning is the best. Thank You.
Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning

Let me break it down as much as possible because my opponent seems to be confused. My mistake, you did say 13-3. But either way, Brady won the super bowl his first season. The Patriots were not "consistent under the years of Drew Bledsoe". Did you not see them losing wins by the year? They were not consistent. It was up and down. 1999 was a career low for him, and then in 2000. The are not consistent. Both teams came into a bad recorded team. Brady did more with his. Yes Brady had talent around him in 2007? You sound like Peyton did not? Marvin Harrison, Dallas Clark, Edgerrin James and Tarik. They both had talent. Peyton had more *offensive talent longer than Brady has. http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com... ^^proves everything I'm trying to tell you. About the draft, you said Deions name was known before Boston. I was proving that (I think everyone agrees) people drafted earlier than people later in the draft have their names already bigger. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com... ^^Takes a better look at both of their careers stats. <"Peyton has played longer than Brady, yes, but considering they are close in age, it is irrelevant."> so just because Brady is the same age, he should have the same career stats as Peyton? Peyton. Has. Had. Five. Seasons. On. Brady. That why Peyton's stats are so volumized. My last point is you say super bowls are a team effort so you cant count that. Seriously? Teams get quarterbacks to win super bowls. They want someone that can lead them to 'the ring'. It doesn't matter if you have MVP every year. If you can't win a super bowl, then frankly you should get a better quarterback. Either way does passing and (QB) rushing not have to do with a team effort? You need a line, and good wide receivers and running backs. None of this is a one man job. Team is involved in everything, Brady uses his better. *Vote Pro*
Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning

Ah, it seems my opponent does not read carefully enough. I stated that "Peyton Manning came to a team which was 3-13 in their first season to 13-3 their second." I also stated that the Patriots were considered "contenders" for the super bowl. Everyone knows the Rams were the favorite. But the Patriots had been consistent in the years under Drew Bledsoe, with the obvious exception of 2000. Normally, in debates I would simply refute all of your arguments one by one, I would like to thank you for saving me the trouble this time. You see, in the first round, which was of course all I had seen at that time, you only used Tom Brady's statistics from the 2007 season. My argument stands. You just confirmed that Tom Brady had his excellent offensive line and receivers in place by that time. I fail to see what draft order means to NFL fame. Jamarcus Russel and Ryan Leaf both were drafted higher than any of these receivers. They are still "no-namers" because the NFL awards players on merit in the system, not some elementary draft order. That is why we are able to have this conversation considering Brady's place in the draft. Do not get distracted, our debate has nothing to do with who wins against the other or even super bowl wins. Both of those are team efforts, and the Patriots would have fewer Super Bowl wins without Adam Vinatieri. Please take the time to read this web link, focusing on the statistics http://bleacherreport.com... How is it that Peyton Manning has surpassed Tom Brady in all major statistics nearly 75% of the years they have played in the same league if he is not the superior player? Peyton has played longer than Brady, yes, but considering they are close in age, it is irrelevant. Tom Brady cannot average 4,796 yards, 34 touchdown passes, and 3 rushing touchdowns every year. He has already lost that competition. Peyton is the most productive QB in history statistically.
Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning

I would Like to point out your mistakes in stats. Yours are opinions not facts. 1) A year before Peyton came into the colts, they went 3-13. The year he started, they went 3-13 AGAIN. *then the year after that he turned it around to 13-3. Tom, on the other hand, came into a franchise that was most definently not a favorite pick for the super bowl 1996= 11 games. (W's) 1997= 10 games. (W's) 1998= 9 games. (W'S) 1999= 8 games. (W's) 2000 (year before Brady) 5 games. (W'S) Brady came into the franchise with a 0-2 record. His very first win was against Peyton Manning. Two weeks later beat Peyton Again. Then went on to win the super bowl. This is all in his first (unexpected) season. 2) Patriot's offensive line didn't come together until 2004. Where they drafted: Matt Light, Dan Koppen, Stephen Neal a few others, then a year later (2005) got Logan Mankins. So basically we are down to Tom's talent as Deon Branch, Wes Welker, and Randy Moss. 3) Randy didn't come till 2007, same with (undrafted) Wes Welker. Deon Branch didn't come till Brady's second season. The only way Deion had his name 'known' would be from college. He had no big awards, except for some impressive stats. But they've been seen from other wide receivers. His stats with patriots: With only 489 receiving yards. Then next season 803, the year after that 454. The year after that (2005) he had his best season yet with 998 (let me point out they did not go further then divisional playoffs). Then the year after that left to the Seattle sea hawks with a total of 725. 2007 he had 343. Deon's stats drop without Mr. Tom Brady. Either way Marvin Harrison's stats from 1999-2006 were all OVER 1,100 yards. 4) Reggie Wayne and Anothy Gonzalez are anything but 'no namers'. They both were drafted earlier than Deion. Tom Bray vs Peyton Manning (Pats vs Colts) Brady is winning 8-5. With more super bowl wins. Even though Peyton has more talent surrounding him, than Brady has had.
Bernie Sanders for U.S. President

Thank you, CentristX , for your offer for a debate. I'm looking forward to it, and appreciate your offer as a very new member of this site. I will be arguing that Bernie Sanders should not be the next President of the United States (POTUS), and will be using the following definitions: Should: a normative judgement - in this instance, I will be arguing that "should/should not" represents capacity/qualifications to fill the role of POTUS. POTUS - I will be relying on the definition of the job description for the President of the United States, not simply using it as a title. Defining this job description will form part of my introductory argument. To clarify my position, I am arguing that Bernie Sanders is ill-suited to filling the role/doing the job of the President of the United States. I will make no endorsement of an alternative candidate either within the Democratic Party nor within any other political party, and I intend to make no argument regarding his overall electability, as that has nothing to do with "should." Once again, thank you for the challenge, and I look forward to a good debate with you
Bernie Sanders for U.S. President

I will be arguing in this debate why Bernie Sanders should be the next United States President. The Con will argue why Bernie Sanders should not be the next president of the United States. Debate Itinerary: Round 1: Acceptance Round 2: Introduction of arguments Round 3 & 4: Rebuttals Round 5: Rebuttals permitted, but conclusions preferred. Once again, if you are interested in taking this debate, please say so in the comments. I look forward to a good debate!
Organ donation should be 'opt out' as opposed to 'opt in'

I'm glad you like the debate, it is something I feel personally passionate about! Religion is the main issue barring the introduction of opt-out organ donation. Although we are a tolerant society towards religion, particularly Christianity, British society is no longer as Christian as it once was. In 2001, 72% of the population identified as Christian, in 2011, it had fallen to 59%. This decreased despite the increase in the size of the population as a whole. The number of people who identified as Atheist or Agnostic increased. In the next few years, less than half the population will identify as Christian. Other religions in society are a small minority and, although they must be tolerated and respected, they are not to be the main consideration in any laws or legislation. Christianity is a religion which accepts and sees organ donation as an act of love. Atheists and Agnostics, of course, have no fundamental issue with the donation of organs. If a large majority of the population are in favour of organ donation, then why not introduce an opt-out policy, a policy which would favour the bulk of the population. Personally, I know many people who are just too lazy to join the organ donor register. They 'will do it one day' or 'don't have the time'. Increasing awareness of organ donation and the ability to become a donor will not change this. They will still have an attitude of being unwilling to put in the minimal effort required. If they were automatically placed on the register, however, they would not have the conviction to remove themselves, because they are not fundamentally opposed to it. The small minority of the population who do feel passionately enough, be it for religious or other reasons, will make the effort to change their situation and opt out of the programme. I am unaware of minority religions specific beliefs surrounding organ donation but from what I know, the majority of the population would accept an organ if they required one. A much, much smaller percentage are willing to give. This is not right and not fair on those who are both willing to give and receive. Considering that we are unable to make a law only allowing organ donors to receive organ transplants, an opt-out policy would make the percentage difference between willing to receive and willing to give much smaller. The mixing of paperwork is a potential issue with anything but there is still the chance with the opt-in system that someone may be opted in by accident, when they did not actually want to be. I look forward to the reply :)