"Pinning the homosexuals" is a terrible idea

I'm not sure how to proceed. If Pro has conceded argument 1, that's fine with me, but then he lists more rebuttals for it! I will answer these rebuttals, then focus on argument 2. I have to admit that I am a little confused by your post, so forgive me if I do something wrong. Pro said, "Basically we are all doomed to hell unless we accept Jesus, so homosexuals are no different. The thing is, Jesus said to save everyone we can, however there will be those who do not accept. That is not condemntion." Really, because to sentence someone to Hell is to CONDEMN THEM! Jesus said, "FEAR HIM WHICH IS ABLE TO DESTROY BOTH SOUL AND BODY IN HELL(Matthew 10:28). He said he casts souls into Hell. Pro said, "I do not see anywhere in Genesis 19 where it said God burned them down for homosexuality. God burned them down for sin, including all kinds of sin." May I first mention that the term "sodomite" that is used for homosexuals comes from this story in Genesis 19. Sodomy refers to anal or oral sex my friend. Now in Genesis 19:4-5 it says, "But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people frm every quarter: And they called unto Lot, and said unto him Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that WE MAY KNOW THEM." They wanted to have sex with angels who they thought looked like men. Pro said, "Everyone in there would just pretend and get out." They would try that, but they would then go back to their sin, and so we lock them up again. If they flee to another country, GOOD. WE DON'T NEED THEM! Pro said, "You were using the only in the wrong place. Anyways, that argument was dropped anyway." Sorry, I didn't know that you had dropped this argument. Pro said, "It may split the family up because not all members may accept Jesus. I do not see how that contradicts "Love your enemies". Well, for Jesus to split up families seems rather "contradictory" to "love your enemies." Do you mean to tell me that Jesus said, "Love your enemies" then turned around and said, "I'm going to split up your families." All I'm saying is that "love your enemies" has certain limitations to it. After all, are you going to "love" the murderer that raped your wife and killed your kids? Jesus didn't believe in letting sin run rampant when he said "love your enemies" now did he? Putting these homosexuals behind a fence prevents sin from running rampant. Pro said, "First, I have already proved with science that homosexuals are born. A homosexual may not engage in homosexual acts, but he would still be considered a homosexual. And yes, they would think before engaging in homosexual acts, but again, you would think that thieves would think before stealing, etc." Really? Where is this proof that they are "born that way?" Again, PRO, YOU NEVER ANSWERED MY QUESTION OF ROUND 2! Let me repeat it: "Further, I would like to ask my opponent a question. If God created everyone the way they are(meaning queers are born that way), then why would God condemn it in the Old Testament, as well as by Paul in the New Testament? Surely, God is being unfair if he is condemning homosexuals, but He made them that way? No, my friend, God DID NOT MAKE THEM THAT WAY!" Please refute this PRO! Otherwise, you might as well concede this argument too. Further, don't you think all the men that CHOOSE TO BE QUEERS OR LESBIANS MIGHT CHOOSE DIFFERENTLY IF THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE PUT BEHIND AN ELECTRIFIED FENCE? And EVEN IF THEY STILL CHOSE TO BE HOMOSEXUAL, THEN BEHIND THE FENCE THEY WILL GO! A thief still goes to jail for stealing my friend!