The god of the bible and the bible has no place in a modern civilized society

“You paid absolutely no attention whatsoever to the videos. You only pay attention to your rambling mouth...”Another attack at me. I specifically answered your points that you took out the videos. I’m still waiting for your responses to my rebuttals. Instead, it looks like you’ve just decided to introduce some new passages which I will also deal with one by one. I’m debating you, not somebody else's opinion on a video and so I am only obligated to debate the points you make - otherwise, that’s just not how debates work. As it so happens, I’ve answered every objection you have raised so far.I’ve watched the videos, it appears that all the points you bring up were also brought up in the videos. If there’s a point you feel I’ve missed, do bring it up and I will tackle it like I’ve done so with all other points you’ve made thus far.There is one thing I’d like to address that the guy in the first video makes (the top 10 reasons why the Bible is repulsive).In the first video (the top 10 reasons why the Bible is repulsive), the guy said at 0:40 “if 99% of Americans believe in the 10 commandments, how can the Bible be repulsive? It’s because they’ve never actually read the Bible.” How on earth does he know this? That is such an over generalization. Plus, can I just say that this is a strawman. It’s not the believing in the 10 commandments that Christians do - it’s the believing in God. The 10 commandments are just accepted, not believed in. He then goes on to bring up the fourth commandment as an example to talk about the Sabbath and then mentions stores that are open on the Sabbath day. This is irrelevant - You’re either a Christian that accepts the Sabbath/Lord’s Day or you’re not. Belief (Trust) in God precedes the accepting of the Sabbath (Which now goes by the Lord’s Day). If you’re working on the Lord’s Day for no good reason, then you’re obviously not trusting in God and this therefore makes you not a Christian, so this 99% figure that was completely made up is massively incorrect. Just a side note here - This is not a violation of the “No true Scotsman” fallacy, because I haven’t redefined what makes a Christian. I’ve simply re-asserted the correct definition (relating to or professing Christianity or its teachings.) The teaching of Christianity state that you must accept the Lord’s Day and not do any work on that day unless it is to do good - feeding your family in this instance when you have no money would be a good thing/charitable thing and not unnecessary work.“Let's look at your jesus breaking the sabbath as you demanded because you are a complete idiot and you do not know your bible AT ALL, you only pretend that you do which never works, only its much worse you sad pathetic oafing manure spread who cannot possibly have any genuine friends or loved ones as so so so many here on debate.org don't and deservedly so don't.”This is just an ad-hom attack again.“Exodus 31:14 "Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it is holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth any work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people." That's pretty clear. And YOUR jesus IS NOT GOD and had no permission whatsoever to overturn this law as he word on the sabbath and thus should---have---been---put---to---death.. Thus jesus WAS NOT THE MESSIAH.”What on earth? I’ve been through this passage already. I’ve already made mention that the law wasn’t changed and neither did Jesus change it. Changing/Adherence are two completely different ideas altogether.“PE-RI-OD. And since NO ONE has chaged this idiotice law among many others tat were listed in RD1 in which I'm not going to get into because you do not know your bible, you only come up with excuses for it AND you do not obey your god, thus you do not believe in him, I'm just slamming you to the rectal itch even further as you rightly deserve. Ready?”The God Christians believe in isn’t confined to the Old Testament. I’m sorry that this seemingly upsets you. If you truly understood the difference between natural law and the Mosaic law, what Jesus came for, what the job of apostles was in teaching things pertaining to the law, you’d understand the points I make. Otherwise, you’re just regurgitating the same stuff over and over again without actually addressing the points I make. Numbers 15: 32-36 "32 And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day. 33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation. 34 And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him. 35 And the Lord said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp. 36 And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the Lord commanded Moses."This is just a description of what the Jews did at a particular place and time. It doesn’t cover the rebuttals I’ve already given and why Christians don’t do this today.John 7:23 "If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day?"Context is key again. In verse 19, Jesus asks the Jews if it was not Moses that gave the law, yet none of them kept the law. The Jews accused Jesus of being possessed because of his authority coming from God to teach. Jesus in the passage was very much against breaking the law. What he was saying is that the Jews misrepresented the Sabbath and took it far too literally when not everything that gets done on the Sabbath constitutes work. Doing good, such as receiving circumcision in this passage was important, even on the Sabbath because it didn't violate the Sabbath, yet it fulfilled other requirements of the law. The whole point of the passage is to do as much good without fear of breaking other aspects of the law.Verse 24 is evidence of this interpretation:John 7:24 Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.John 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.This occurred after Jesus had healed an ill man and told him to rise and take up his bed. The Jews told the man not to take up his bed because they deemed that this was work and that it would break the Sabbath requirements. Jesus in other passages says that it is lawful to do well on the Sabbath. See the following passage:Matthew 12:10-12 And, behold, there was a man which had his hand withered. And they asked him, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath days? that they might accuse him. (11) And he said unto them, What man shall there be among you, that shall have one sheep, and if it fall into a pit on the sabbath day, will he not lay hold on it, and lift it out? (12) How much then is a man better than a sheep? Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the sabbath days.There can be exceptions to a rule and nothing in Old Testament law restricts exceptions to the rule when good needs to be done. When it’s lawful to do good on the Sabbath, this meets the exception to the rule that Jesus (who is God and had authority from the Father) stipulated. The same explanation for this passage would apply to John 9:14-16, Matthew 12:1-2, Luke 13:14 and Mark 3:1-6.Thank you.