Charlie Sheen is more socially undesirable than Lindsey Lohan.

In the comment sections my opponent defines socially undesirable as "not benefiting society because of harm caused". He goes on by stating: "In essence, who causes more harm? The metric for harm, then, can be impact on the society that both subjects (Sheen and Lohan) primarily affect. So that the scope isn't too exceptionally broad, let's just stipulate that it's America we're talking about. We might draw the following question, then, from the debate: Is America worse off because of Charlie Sheen or Lindsey Lohan? Of course, the resolution implies that both parties cause harm. If we accept that both Sheen and Lohan cause harm, then who causes more harm?" What actions can cause harm? I can endanger or destroy your life, liberty, or property. These are objectively actions that would cause harm to others. Now, in theory drug addiction should only cause personal harm. In other words If Lindsay Lohan dies of a cocaine overdose, she's the one that bares the cost. Nobody else. However, this is not true. If someone of influence does drugs it has a ‘multiplier effect'. It encourages other people to follow in their idol's path. So which person has a more profound influence? Lindsay Lohan is a Disney movie star who starred in "Herbie Fully Loaded", "Freaky Fridays" and "Get a Clue". These shows are designed to be watched by younger audiences. Charlie Sheen is well known for his role in "Two and a half man". He plays an alcoholic, narcissistic, misogynistic douchebag on two and a half man. His character is designed to be dislikable. The show is designed for adults. So based on these comparisons: It should be obvious that Lindsay Lohan will have a greater ‘multiplier effect' on socially destructive behavior. Children are naturally influences by idols, and are easily influenced by persuasion. Adult minds are less likely to be influenced so easily. However, besides the multiplier effect, what else has Lindsay Lohan done? She has had two recorded DUIs! Remember, police officers are unlikely to catch a person every time they are drinking while driving. So she has likely has drank and drove many times.[1] Drinking while driving is a serious offense. The dangers of drinking while driving isn't just personalized, its socialized. Her intoxication was a danger to all drivers and pedestrians on the road. She could have easily killed someone. This behavior is also amplified from the ‘multiplier effect' that I explained earlier. Charlie Sheen has not once been convicted of a criminal offense. Lindsay Lohan has also been anorexic[2]. This is again, a bad influence on young impressionable minds. It is estimated that 80,000 people die from anorexia a year. Lohan's behavior only harms others who will likely develop an eating disorder due to Lindsay Lohan's anorexia. Lindsay Lohan also stole a $2500 necklace, even though Lindsay Lohan makes millions herself. This is theft of property and directly harmful. If she wasn't caught, the storeowner would have lost $2500. Think about this. How many people do you know that stole anything worth $2500. Also, how would you feel if $2500 was stolen from you?[3] It should also be noted that Lindsay Lohan also smokes cocaine, just like Charlie Sheen. However, Lindsay Lohan has done something that is much worse than any of the above. Her most atrocious offense is this: SHE TRIED TO ENDORSE BARACK OBAMA![4] That's right. She tried to endorse Barack Obama. This guy has increased the size of our national deficient, and dropped more bombs then George W. Bush ever has. He has introduced a new healthcare bill that promises to increases the national deficient and will crowd-out private health insurance and make it more expensive for employers to pay for health insurance. He has exacerbated the problems of the economic collapse. He has put the US down a path of unsustainable debt. He has lied about his promises of "Washington as usual", "bipartisanship", and the end of lobbyist control. Worse, she described Sarah Palin as a 'a narrow-minded, media-obsessed homophobe.'.[5] That is just mean. Ironically, If Sarah Palin were to be president, she would likely be a great president. She had the highest approval ratings of any governor in Alaska, balanced the budget, and pushed for ethics reform in Alaska's government. Lindsay Lohan is just a mean girl. Charlie Sheen at least can come up with intelligent statements. Here are some examples: "That we are to stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." "This bootleg cult, arrogantly referred to as Alcoholics Anonymous, reports a 5 percent success rate." His statement about AA is correct. Not only have that, but his opposition against AA made others think about this destructive organization. This organization, not only has a low success rate, but the 12 step program is quite religious.[6] It removes the individual from responsibility and puts him or her in a helpless state. How would this program work for an atheist? Worse, this program is required for those with a DUI. This is outrageous. Let's compare Charlie Sheen's quotes to Lindsay Lohan's "brainy quotes" "When someone tells me not to do something, I'll do it more" "How can you not like Britney Spears?" Rebuttal: First, Pro tries to make the outrageous claim that Lindsay Lohan at least admitted to what she did while Charlie Sheen did not. Lindsay Lohan had to plea guility. There was no way out of it. It's not an apology. Charlie Sheen has also pleaded guilty for his crimes.[7] It does not make it honorable, but it's an easy way to reduce one's crime sentence. Even still, Lindsay Lohan pleaded not guilty to stealing a necklace even though there was video tape evidence she did.[3] Pro's own source shows that Charlie admits to doing cocaine stating he has done "7 gram rocks" of cocaine. Next, Pro falsely states that Charlie Sheen has not been clean, while Lindsay Lohan has not. This is quite false. Lindsay Lohan has only given us her word. Charlie Sheen gave us more, his pee. In a drug test, Charlie Sheen tested clean for drugs.[8] This is more than can be said for Lindsay Lohan. Charlie Sheen has also been in rehab as well as Lindsay Lohan[9]. Charlie Sheen just did not like his experience there. He's right too. The success rate of rehab is low, and questionable. The decision to become clean is based mainly one's willingness to be clean. PRO claims that Justin Bieber claimed Charlie Sheen is the most influential person. There are two problems with this statement. First off, it's a massive appeal to authority. What gives Justin Bieber the authority to claim Charlie Sheen is the most influential person. What was his survey? Second off, I couldn't even gain access to the link provided, so I don't even know if this statement is true. http://tinyurl.com...[1] http://tinyurl.com...[2] http://tinyurl.com...[3] http://tinyurl.com...[4] http://tinyurl.com...[5] http://www.12step.org...[6] http://tinyurl.com...[7] http://tinyurl.com...[8] http://tinyurl.com...[9]