Anthropogenic global climate change.

R3 Rebuttals"Studies Contradict Man Made WarmingAnthropogenic climate change is not real. Yes, the climate changes, but humans aren't the cause of it." RepconThere are some scholarly peer reviewed studies that claim man made global climate change doesn't exist but they are in the vast minority. "The 928 papers were divided into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position. Of all the papers, 75% fell into the first three categories, either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view; 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change. Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position." [1]The 800 year lag is a misunderstanding of the Milankovitch cycle. "The outgassing of CO2 from the ocean has several effects. The increased CO2 in the atmosphere amplifies the original warming. The relatively weak forcing from Milankovitch cycles is insufficient to cause the dramatic temperature change taking our climate out of an ice age (this period is called a deglaciation). However, the amplifying effect of CO2 is consistent with the observed warming." [13]"Manipulation by Scientists and Bribing by the GovernmentOne of the biggest science scandals, Climategate, occurred in 2009. Hackers stole emails from scientists at the East Angelia Climatic Research Unit, and statements from the emails contradict anthropogenic climate change. " Repcon"Though some of the CRU emails can sound damning when quoted out of context, several inquiries have cleared the scientists. The Independent Climate Change Email Review put the emails into context by investigating the main allegations. It found the scientists' rigour and honesty are not in doubt, and their behaviour did not prejudice the IPCC's conclusions, though they did fail to display the proper degree of openness. The CRU emails do not negate the mountain of evidence for AGW." [14]The scientists were honest, the quotes were out of context. As for your quote from nationalreview, nationalreview is very bias."These media sources are highly biased toward conservative causes. They utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Sources in this category may be untrustworthy." [15]"This bias completely destroys the point of researching issues like climate change. Research isn't supposed to be "Let's try to prove our political agenda.". It's supposed to be a non partisan look into an issue affecting our lives. How can we accept something as a fact if the people researching the issue are lying to us." RepconClimate scientists aren't lying to us. There are multiple safeguards in place to prevent this from happening. Just for starters the peer review system.As for Mars we understand so little about Mars atmosphere that this is weak evidence at best. Furthermore, the tempature increase on Mars can be explained by dust storms. "ConclusionThe empirical evidence isn't conclusive on whether global warming is happening on Mars. However, to answer the question on whether the sun is causing Earth's global warming, there is plentiful data on solar activity and Earth's climate. Many papers have examined this data, concluding the correlation between sun and climate ended in the 70's when the modern global warming trend began.So the argument that Martian warming disproves anthropogenic global warming fails on two points - there is little empirical evidence that Mars is warming and Mars' climate is primarily driven by dust and albedo, not solar variations."[16]Solar activity from the Sun is at a low. "Many papers have examined this data, concluding the correlation between sun and climate ended in the 70's when the modern global warming trend began." [16]Thanks for debating. Sources.13. https://skepticalscience.com...14. https://www.skepticalscience.com...15. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com...16. https://www.skepticalscience.com...