Prophet Muhammad (sawa) is Prophesied in The Bible

Well I finally thank Julia for admitting that she is wrong about John 1:19-21.Julia said ""God came from Teman, the Holy One from Mount Paran. His glory covered the heavens and his praise filled the earth. His splendor was like the sunrise; rays flashed from his hand, where his power was hidden." (Habakkuk 3:3-4) We say that Teman and Paran refer to Medina and Mecca. My opponent can't deny it. At least, the Bible clearly says that Paran is located in Arabia."My response: Once again, Julia has managed to make every possible error she possibly could. Teman is not Medina/Mecca, not even close, Teman is Edom (modern day Southern Jordan) which is nowhere near Arabia.Mount Paran is simply another name for Mount Sinai, where on Earth is Julia getting the silly claims that Teman and Paran as Medina and Mecca? She said the Bible saus Paran is in Arabia, which she gave no reference from the Bible, so no, I rejet your claims.Julia said "Christians fail to answer how God would come from Paran, because they believe "There's no God in all the world except in Israel." (2 Kings 5:15)"My response: I really don't know what your point is...what is it about this passage that proves your case? All this passage is saying that the God of Israel is the only true God. And by the way Habakkuk 3:3 is talking about GOD, nt Muhammad, so who do you think you are applying a passage about GOD to Muhammad? Do you even realize that you are guilty of shirk?Julia said "They fail to explain how it refers to Jesus. Because they believe he's "only sent to the lost sheep of Israel." (Matthew 12:54)"My response: First off, Habakkuk 3:3 is talking about Jesus and his second coming. The passage says God, but Jesus is God, so this passage applies to him. Jesus being the image of the invisible God is the only one who can fit this passage because no one can see God the Father in all his glory and live. Jesus Christ is therefore the one possible candidate in view here.Secondly, how about instead of taking the New Testament out of context, actually read what Jesus says in the very same Gospel you quoted..."Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations" (Matthew 28:19)Jesus ministry was only restricted to the House of Israel, true, but after his resurrection, the message would spread throught the world by his disciples. So read everything Jesus says, don't just take what suits your interests and ignore everything else that conflicts with your position.Julia said "As Muslims, we believe this prophecy refers to Muhammad. But my opponent says that "the Prophet" is an Israelite who is Jesus. So I want him to explain; What is the connection between an Israeilte and Arabia? How did Jesus fulfill this prophecy?"My response: The answer is Jesus hasn't fulfilled it yet, because we are still waiting for his second coming. My question to you is how does Muhammad fulfill this? I already refuted your argument that Teman and Paran mean Mecca, so unless you can use the Bible to refute me, you have no argument from this passage. And most of all, the passage is talking about God. So unless you believe Muhammad is God, feel free to use this passage, but you are guilty of shirk.Julia said "But it's unfair to quote this verse out of context, right? Because my opponent may misunderstand and says that the other nation refers to the Gentiles which is not true."My response: I don't know what you are trying to prove here...are you seriously trying to use the New Testament to use it in the way the New Testament itself doesn't define its terms? The kingdom being given to another nation simply means the Jews because they rejected Jesus the Messiah, the Gospel would be preached to the entire world. I mean Jesus himself explicitly says this, so how are you trying to argue otherwise?Julia then quoted Matthew 21:33-44 and proved that from this parable, he was predicting that people would reject Muhammad.My response: Again, another case of Julia completely missing the point of Jesus' words and reading things into the text.Julia was right for most of her exegesis, until she tried arguing Muhammad is the stone, which she is off completely. Jesus was simply quoting Psalm 118:22, which he interprets as meaning that Jesus, who is the stone will be rejected, but is the chief corner-stone (i.e leader). Trying to interpret a passage in Psalms about referring to a prophet outside of the nation of Israel is self-deating, because the Israelites were warned by God to not set as kings over them a foreigner (like Arabs), but only from among the nation of Israel.Julia said "Some Christians say that Jesus is the stone. Bit it's not true. Jesus was from David's lineage. He was from the Israelities. What does it mean that Jesus was rejected? The stone refers to the Ishmael and his descendants who were humiliated and rejected by the Israelities."My response: It's not true? Are you really serious? Jesus quoted Psalm 118:22 and applied it to himself, he never quoted it and applied it to Muhammad, so you are once again reading things into the text. Just allow the text to speak for itself....Julia said "This parable is not true about Jesus. Read John 12:46-47. Jesus never fought or killed his enemies. But we know as a fact that Muhammad had many battles against his enemies."My response: Again the conclusion of Jesus' parable has to do with his second coming, so obviously it hasn't been fulfilled yet. Trying to take Jesus words as a prophecy of Jesus here is to miss the point completely.Julia said "Thirdly, in the parable of vineyard owner, the son refers to Jesus. It is nonsense if we say the stone is again Jesus."My response: Yeah, it is nonsense to say Jesus is the stone, even though that's what Jesus himself said that he was...then we are to assume that the stone is some Pagan Arab named Muhammad. You're completely distorting Jesus' words, and yet you think my interpretation is "nonsense" when I base my interpreation on the scriptures themselves, so I don't know, I think i'll go with what the scriptures say, not with what Julia says.Julia said "My opponent was Muslim one day. He has surely read this narration: "Narrated Abu Huraira:" Allah's Apostle said, "My similitude in comparison with the other prophets before me, is that of a man who has built a house nicely and beautifully, except for a place of one brick in a corner. The people go about it and wonder at its beauty, but say: 'Would that this brick be put in its place!' So I am that brick, and I am the last of the Prophets." (Sahih Bukhari: Vol. 4, Book 56, #735)"My response: I couldn't careless what Muhammad says, he is not an authority for me. It is your burden to prove he is a prophet predicted in the Bible, which you have failed to do so far. Simply quoting Muhammad for me and saying "believe it" is circular logic (assuming what you have yet to prove (i.e the prophethood of Muhammad). Stop assuming I think Muhammad is authoritative, because he is not.Your job in this debate is to prove Muhammad is predicted in the Torah and Gospel, so please stay on topic.