I am the best debater on Debate.org

Its good to be able to debate you again. Now lets begin. Incidentally its Christmas not "Holidays" just in case you forgot. Observations: As I have expected you have accepted my elaboration on definitions via not addressing them. Thank you for that because this shall make things much easier for me. Anyhow lets go into the next section. AFT (argument from time): 1) The word "am" is defined as "(present 1st person singular)". This obviously refers to the time he presented his argument. That is when he submitted this debate not a moment more because that would not be "the present time" anymore nor no moments earlier because the debate has not yet been set up meaning that you're not yet a debater. 2) Now lets look at the word "debater". According to your definition "debater- someone that debates". I have also elaborated on this and when we add those two definitions we can see that a debater is someone who is presently engaging in a debate. One can argue that my elaboration (in the previous round) on this word contradicts what my opponent is saying but that is only true when this word is isolated. That is because I defined this word without considering the word "am", it was my mistake I admit however this mistake has just made me refute a possible objection in the future rounds. Wherefore the definition when considering the word "am" and your definition and mine is: A person who is debating. Conclusion)So as you can see my opponent was arguing that at the 'present' time (reference to the moment he posted this) he was the best debater. I agree because at the 'present time' (which refers to the moment he posted this) there was no opposition and like a famous Lithuanian philosopher once said "if no one is in front of you, you are number one". An argument is stronger than nothing. Q. What about win ratio and etcetera ? A. That is a reference to the past. We are talking about the "present". In the 'present time' there was nothing but you and your posted argument. Vice versa your position doesn't change according to your win ratio a hour later. Q. No argument was posted on round one. A. Depends on your definition for example I would say that denying that you're not better at something is an argument in itself. However if we ignore this we're left with an assertion and an assertion is superior to nothing, obviously. AFI (argument from ignorance): My opponent "declares" that he is not the best debater on this site. Now according to the definition there's a difference between saying and declaring. The burden is not to show that its more likely that you are not the best debater but its to prove without doubt "to state emphatically". state: "to declare definitely or specifically: She stated her position on the case." emphatically: "clearly or boldly outlined: It stands, like a great, stone dagger, emphatic against the sky." I have doubts: 1. You may have multiple accounts ; you have given no evidence to refute this. Q. What about my win ratio ? A. Well obviously if all your accounts are counted your win ratio increases. Q. It doesn't increase the Ethopia619 accounts win ratio. A. We are talking about the "debater". Debater is a reference to a person and not an internet account. Q. Motivation ? A. That doesn't matter but hey Ill give you one anyway: this new account lets you have fun and takes away the pressure one would get to win. Q. Its not allowed A. Yet its very possible 2. You may be concealing your skills. You may be the best debater here but instead of creating multiple accounts you decided to take it easy for a moment hence you'll do very well. Q. Doesn't affect my current win ratio. A. If you're concealing your true talent then your current win ratio doesn't reflect how good of a debater you are. Q. Unseen talent equals no talent. A. No. Unseen talent would make someone secretly the best debater. Secretly but still the best. 3. You're the best around You may be so good that you managed to be the best debater and conceal it in a way I don't know. Q. That's appeal to ignorance. A. You brought it upon yourself. Q. If I'm the best then how come I'm about to lose this ? A. This may be a part of a larger scheme - that's how good you are !! Thank you for reading. http://www.youtube.com...