Belief in religion and a creator are inductive arguments.

Amended Resolution: Beliefs in a creator as well as religion are based on inductive arguments only Let me define belief (as a noun) and inductive.Belief (http://oxforddictionaries.com...): something one accepts as true or real; a firmly held opinion.Inductive (http://oxforddictionaries.com...):characterized by the inference of general laws from particular instances.Belief in religion and/or a creator is partially based on SOME degree of inductive argumentation. Nonetheless, the majority of belief in religion and/or a creator is very often little to do with logic of any kind to begin with.It is often based around the human urge to feel 'right', 'moral' or more 'correct' than most in reward for an eternal existence of pure pleasure. On the other end of the scale in proving that the emotional urge for feeling 'more correct than others' being the motivation and fundamental foundation for belief in religion and/or a creator I shall suggest that religion, in its first instance, was created by Hindus who, as a strong part of their faith, believe you get reborn based on karmic debt. If you ha ea lot of karmic debt, you'll be born as a poor beggar with deformities (as was a commonplace sight in India) whilst if you were 'good' all your life and had next to no karmic debt at all, you would probably be reborn as a successful billionaire or princess. The reasoning behind their religion was to make people think they would always live on and that the physical form of themselves was a mere representation of how hard they worked beforehand to pay off karmic debt. It also was a coping mechanism for those in very dire circumstances to feel as if they were merely regretting what they did wrong before and that they truly deserved what was happening to them and that everything was fine and justified. It had nothing to do with any interpretation of general laws nor logic, it was the emotional urge to feel 'more correct than others' or to feel as if 'what is happening to me is for a far greater reason than a mere man's urge to hurt me' or even more significantly 'I am so important that every single action I do, thought I have and way of life will have a huge effect on not just me but those I compete with to exist in bliss' it is a means of competing on a far higher level than income, which made the vast population of poor people very comforted emotionally.Buddhism is a religion without a creator. It is the only one. It is based around the philosophy that you will either die and go to Nirvana (which essentially 'nothingness' or be reborn as a very harshly treated soul (Buddhism originally began as a more severe form of Hinduism whereby the aim was to destroy yourself, since to exist is to have imperfections of some kind, whilst those who had ego or any cruel sense of nature would be punished by being on the receiving end in a later life whilst you could get eternal peace if you weren't cruel and new souls would be created to fill your place). Such a religion displays the nature of belief even more significantly because you are not reborn with privileges, your aim is merely to be humble at all times... Why? Simply because it feels good.Emotions and feeling are the foundation of religious belief in a creator or simply in religion itself. Inductive arguments only help strengthen it.