The God of Abrahamic religions is not real. (Christianity, Judaism, Islam)

This is going to look like nit picking but I promise it's not, I'll go back to your other points. "you can't take the Bible literally." What does that mean? This book is supposed to be God's word, the outline for an entire religion. But it's okay to only believe some of it? That's not how it works, either you believe it all or none. If you can believe that hell isn't a literal place what else isn't true? Was Adam not made of dirt? Was the Earth not created in 6 days? Did the Earth not flood for 40 days and 40 nights? Did the Hebrews not cross the desert? Did Jesus not die and then rise from the dead? If you classify one part of the bible being less true than the others you invalidate the accuracy of the book as a whole. The bible is an infallible text, to take away that infallibility makes it no more true than Harry Potter. As for your God can be loving but hell can exist argument. A father letting his son be poor, and subjecting someone to eternal torture and fire. Are two completely different things. Especially when the son caused his own troubles, what about the 5 billion people who don't believe in the Christian God. Are they all going to hell because by no fault of their own they were raised to follow a different God? The analogy is not perfect. If you believe God is all powerful than yes he can just beam them to the high life. When you forgive someone you don't cast them out so they spend the rest of time existing in Agony, for some mistakes they made in the short time that was their life. The existence of God is no more possible than the existence of flying unicorns, I saw that argument yesterday. Even if the existence of such a creature is less than 1-100,000,000,000,000,000 no matter how many zero's you put after that it could still exist. That is not a good argument. There is nothing reasonable about it. Quantum Mechanics required the theory of relativity which involves math and other theories. The only proof we have for the existence of God is an ancient book written by men who thought the earth was flat, the heart controlled emotion, and that the weather cycle was dependent on animal sacrifice. How could these men possibly have any knowledge of the supernatural or the origin of our existence? There is plenty evidence against the existence of God. Firstly the bible says the Earth and the rest of existence was created in 6 days roughly 7000 years ago. Obviously that is not true, we find rocks that are hundreds of millions years old. We find human bones that are over 100,000 thousand years old. This is the core concept of Christianity, that the Earth was created by God at this time in that time period. Without this the chances of him existing start to fall apart. Homosexuality, I'm a straight married man. I have nothing against gays. It doesn't make it impossible, but again it lowers the chances of his existence. If God did hate homosexuals, then there is another problem with the logic of God. If you hate something why create it? If it's not natural why does it exist in all parts of nature. Surely if homosexuality was against His will he would never allow such indiscretion to occur in His natural kingdom. There is no faith in Science. Faith requires belief in the lack of evidence. There is absolutely no faith involved in Science. If there was it would no longer be science, because it would be devoid of evidence. Your argument makes no sense. By believing something that provides me with evidence, instead of something that does not I am a hypocrite? I am not blindly believing in Science, I require facts, evidence, statistics to form my opinions. I understand religion just as well if not better than you do. There are no misconceptions about the bible, it says what it says. And the Church agrees that the bible is infallible. Now here's something. God is supposed to be Pure and Good. Free will, God gives everyone free will right? Say a woman and her son are walking down the street and a rapist and a murderer attack them. Since God is everywhere he sees this. Someone's free will is going to have to be violated, and there is a choice between violating the murderers and rapists free will or the will of the mother and child. But instead of stopping rapes or murderers God lets them happen. No Good being would allow rape or murder to happen when there are other alternatives. If that was too complicated here is some simple logic. God is omniscient and knows everything, including everything that has happened and will happen, as well as every thought your mind creates before you think it. If that's the case, there is no "free will." So that's one pillar of Christianity. God is omnipotent, and can do anything. If God can do anything but doesn't lift a finger to stop all the disasters, massacres and wars that have happened, are happening now and will happen in the future, God is a psychopath who enjoys watching our misery. There goes the pure and good. However, if the God is not omniscient or omnipotent... well, in that case God is not a "god" and doesn't exist. I look forward to your refutation, and I think you're being pretty civil with this whole debate thing, and I appreciate that.