There are no right or wrong answers in Ethics

I have attempted to refrain from using my personal opinions and ethical values to help support my overall case throughout all previous arguments but note what I am about to offer is not being given to defend my personal views nor are they being given to oppose yours or in anyway attempt to convince you, or anyone else that has the same set of ethical values, otherwise but to offer a basic precise example, somewhat of a "blueprint", of the broader point that I am trying to prove that there are no right or wrong answers in Ethics. You stick strongly with the belief that murdering someone under any circumstance(capital punishment etc.) is what is ethically wrong and that all people do or should feel the same and now you add that if not, "There is something wrong in the way they think." I personally believe otherwise, and have a completely different ethical view on this matter. I strongly stand by the belief that if someone is a murderer/ brutal rapist, or both, of an innocent person, an innocent mother or child or anyone who did nothing to deserve the crime that has been committed upon them that criminal does not deserve to live and I too, as mentioned in my second argument, also believe that dependent on the severity of those crimes capital punishment is sort of an "easy way out" for these criminals that have committed such extreme levels of terror and crime. This is my way of thinking, this is what I strongly believe and will stand by, there is nothing that anyone can offer that would make me believe that my way of thinking is wrong. You say that this way of thought is skewed but the feeling is the same in regards to the point of view you stand by on the matter but what I am getting at is that no matter what you or I or anyone chooses to personally believe, there is no element or factor that gets to decide which one of our views on this ethical matter is more valid because it is a comes from a matter of opinion. Neither of us are ever going to be concretely right nor wrong, many will agree with my way of thinking and many will also agree with yours, because it isn't a matter of who is right nor wrong it is just a difference in ethical and moral values. If someone were to have loved ones murdered by a heartless criminal and then the original victim who had the ones around him taken away went and sought out some sort of revenge on that person, I and many others would not see that as ethically wrong and would feel that not only justice has been properly served but that the original murder received what he deserved. No one gets to decide that my ethical values and views on this are wrong because they are my set of personal ethical values, the same way you have yours, and everyone is entitled to their own. Even if the person who had lost all and sought out for vengeance was then convicted by the law for murder, regardless of the circumstance, that still wouldn't define a right or wrong answer on this ethical matter because the law or people in high government positions, just the same as religion, is most definitely not the most valid structure of ethics. Regardless of what the law would have said I and many people would still see nothing morally wrong with that man did in retaliation to the crimes committed around him and that is why there is such strong debates and controversy surrounding these mater of ethics; there is always more than one view and there is no way to prove that there is one "right" or "wrong" answer proving that there really is no right or wrong answers in ethics as a whole. As far as the example you us regarding the holocaust, yes it is obvious that Nazi Officials committed disturbing crimes under the name of Adolf Hitler, but after the holocaust was over the Nuremberg Trials, a series of trials held for the sole purpose of bringing nazi war criminals to justice, took place and many of those Nazi Officials were sentenced to life in prison but the majority were, to what you argue is ethically wrong, death. As you mentioned yourself these criminals attempted to wipe out "a non-aryan" race the extent of their crimes were unbelievably disturbing and unfathomable do you really believe it is ethically wrong to sentence these Nazi officials to death? Whatever your view is on that point does not change the fact that there will still be an opposing side to what you believe even if it is unfathomable to one because as individuals, groups, and societies we all have our own set of belief, values, and opinions and that is what ethics ultimately is, a matter of opinion. Everyone will have their own set of ethical values ranging from situation to situation and fluctuating in severity dependent on the issue or conflict at hand because ethics is the moral principles that govern a persons or groups behavior, each view, as mentioned throughout each argument based on opinion concluding and proving that there are no right or wrong answers when it comes to ethics.