only now is true, now is matter

IntroductionUnfortunately, my opponent has, throughout this debate, presented not even one coherent or logical argument that supports his contention, "only now is true, now is matter." I am very disappointed that I was not able to engage in an educated discussion with my opponent during this debate, though will still rebut what is left of his incoherent claims.Definitionsonly - adverb - without others or anything further; alone; solely; exclusively:now - adverb - at the present time or moment:true - adjective - being in accordance with the actual state or conditions; conforming toreality or fact; not false:matter - noun - the substance or substances of which any physical object consists or iscomposed:information - noun - knowledge communicated or received concerning a particular fact orcircumstance; news:knowledge - noun - acquaintance with facts, truths, or principles, as from study orinvestigation; general erudition:real - adjective - existing or occurring as fact; actual rather than imaginary, ideal, orfictitious:fact - noun - something that actually exists; reality; truth:memory - noun - the act or fact of retaining and recalling impressions, facts, etc.;imagination - noun - the faculty of imagining, or of forming mental images or concepts of what is not actually present to the senses.All definitions gathered from dictionary.reference.com.Rebuttals"only now is true, facts are not true"Clearly, the definition of 'fact' that has been provided shows how facts are of truth. Furthermore, truths (in the form of facts) are found throughout history, not just in the present. For example, it is a known true fact that many dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago in the past. http://www.sciencedaily.com..."fact=truth=knowledge=memory of personal physical experience"My opponent previously stated that "facts are not true." However, he now says that "facts=truth." My opponent's statements are obviously contradictory. "know negates belief.. know is life, as im dead without my senses"'Knowledge' does not negate 'belief'. For the last time, I can both know and believe something (e.g. 1+2=3)."belief is false, as i dont know is true"Belief is not always false. For example, I correctly believe that 1+2=3.knowledge is truth, know is true, true is only nowI agree that knowledge is truth. However, this does not mean that truth is only now. For example, it is true that many dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago in the past. http://www.sciencedaily.com..."you even agree know negates belief"I have never done so."no, without content numbers have no use, the number 5 as just a number in my mind is 0. everything is something, something is 1, matter is 1, a soda in my hand is 1"Numbers can still be relevant without relating to physical beings/matter. For example, the concept that 1+2=3 is still valid and true, even though it doesn't necessarily pertain to a physical object or matter. "there is no matter for you to experience without your senses"I do not understand this incoherent statement. Once more, if my opponent had wished to win this debate, he should've provided organized and understandable arguments and claims. He has not done so. "imagination is false, eat imagianry food for the rest of the week and see what happend"Imagination is not necessarily false. According to my definition above, imagination is simply the forming of mental images or concepts of what is not present to the senses. I can imagine true things. For example, I can imagine that 5+2=7, even though I can not physically sense this.Conclusion Overall, my opponent has still failed to fulfill his Burden of Proof, as he provides no reasonable/logical evidence or proof for his claims. Meanwhile, I have successfully rebutted each of my opponent's statements. Therefore, I am the clear winner of this debate. Thanks! :D