South Korea and North Korea should reunite within the next 5 years.

Well, he forfeited his round. However, I will still post the AC The framework for the round will be one of Deontology: FW1) Duty to protect rights Fagan, Human Rights Center writes: National and international institutions bear the primary responsibility of securing human rights and the test for successfully fulfilling this responsibility is the creation of opportunities for all individuals to lead a minimally good life. The realization of human rights requires establishing the conditions for all human beings to lead minimally good lives and thus should not be confused as an attempt to create a morally perfect society. While the object of individual human rights may be modest, the force of that right is intended to be near absolute. That is to say, the demands of rights are meant to take precedence over other possible social goals. rights as trumps expresses the fundamental ideal of equality upon which the contemporary doctrine of human rights rests. Treating rights as trumps is a means for ensuring that all individuals are treated in an equal and like fashion in respect of the provision of fundamental human rights. Fully realizing the aspirations of human rights may not require the provision of 'state of the art' resources, but this should not detract from the force of human rights as taking priority over alternative social and political considerations. AND FW2) Duty to protect freedom Sylvester Petro, professor of law at Wake Forest University, Toledo Law Review, p. 480 However, one may still insist, echoing Ernest Hemingway – “I believe in only one thing: liberty.” And it is always well to bear in mind David Hume’s observation: “It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once.” Thus, it is unacceptable to say that the invasion of one aspect of freedom is of no import because there have been invasions of so many other aspects. That road leads to chaos, tyranny, despotism, and the end of all human aspiration. Ask Solzhenitsyn. Ask Milovan Djilas. In sum, if one believes in freedom as a supreme value, and the proper ordering principle for any society aiming to maximize spiritual and material welfare, then every invasion of freedom must be emphatically identified and resisted with undying spirit. 1. North Korean Human Rights Violations civilliberties.about.com write: "North Korea is in all likelihood the most oppressive regime on Earth. The North Korean government enforces loyalty and obedience through its Ministry of People's Security, which requires citizens to spy on each another, including family members. Anyone who is overheard saying anything perceived as critical to the government is subject to a reduced loyalty group rating, torture, execution, or imprisonment in one of North Korea's ten brutal concentration camps. The North Korean government divides its citizens into three castes based on their perceived loyalty to the Dear Leader: "core" (haeksim kyechung), "wavering" (tongyo kyechung), and "hostile" (joktae kyechung). Most of the wealth is concentrated among the "core," while the "hostile"--a category that includes all members of minority faiths, as well as descendants of perceived enemies of the state--are denied employment and subject to starvation. As many as 3.5 million North Koreans died of starvation." Thus, affirming the resolution will take out the oppressive North Korean regime, which will protect rights 2. Reliance on Domestic Regime Change is Futile Taylor, Comparative Strategy writes: "Advocates of a more deliberate approach to regime change, however, could rightly argue that predictions of an impending DPRK leadership collapse served as one of the primary rationales for US acceptance of the 1994 Agreed Framework, and that such an outcome never eventuated. They could point out that the regime has already survived a decade of severe national economic hardship, and that it could well endure considerably longer. Moreover, they could also note that the interests of North Korea’s neighbors, particularly China, lie with preventing a complete economic implosion. Likewise, Beijing clearly remains apprehensive over the ﬂood of refugees that could result from any signiﬁcant degree of economic dislocation in the DPRK."