Intelligent Design

I like how my opponent decided that he would convince his audience by taking what I said and adding in his own commentary, effective but not to creative. First off I think he was confused on my statement "If every fact pointed to a creator, and the creator wanted faith there is no point in his design." Yes to prove something there needs to be evidence. But I was suggesting that if there was a creator the evidence that we would be presented to us would be in a way, filtered. Where we can only see what we are suppose to see. It might make more scenes later on in my discussion. ( http://www.seekfind.net... ) Here is your source. Now as my opponent mentioned like five times that I have not supported my case of an intelligent designer. I have only “bashed” evolution. Well my goal in that was to bring up that science’s theory of how life started needs almost the same amount faith then an intelligent designer. Now on to God! Let’s take one of the most popular religions, Christianity. Jesus was the son of god. That’s what he said. So why should we believe him? Well this religion came with good reliable documentation. The reason I say reliable is because it was written by normal eye witnesses. They were not geniuses, or prodigies they just experienced what Jesus said, and did, and wrote them down. We might say that they could have lied and made Jesus up just to mess with people. There are several clues that suggest that they were not just in some hideaway making up this story. If you read all of the books there are some things that are repeated. Like the healing of the paralyzed man and other examples. The thing that is most interesting is that there are some repeated stories that are off. Like Mathew said there were four men in the room and Mark said there were five. These errors are good because if every account was identical to each other then we can see how it was just planned out by a group, but that’s not what happened here. Another example is that if they wanted people to believe there story they would not have said that a women discovered that Jesus’ dead body was gone. If they were making it up they probably would have said a man would have, because a woman was very low in the social structure so if they wanted people to believe there story they would have chosen a man to discover his empty tomb. Also if we look at the tradition at that time, the scribes that past down these stories had a tradition of remembering every word of the story before they wrote it down themselves. This is very important because it’s not like the scribes were just adding in parts to fill the bible with untruthful events or forgetting the true story. The bible is almost a primary source from eye witness accounts of Jesus’ life. Now a lot of people could say that Jesus could not be the son of god, he could just be a very smart person. Well he did more than just tell stories and had a way with words. He physically did things that today we still can’t do. An example I mentioned before was that he healed a paralyzed man in a matter of seconds. It doesn’t matter how smart you are no normal human could do that. The bible is not a book of lies that were stirred up to make people confused. A lot of people may disagree with what the bible may say, however that does not mean its validity decreases. It is historic documentation of the life of Jesus Christ and what he did. And when Jesus, (the son of god) preached he would say “because of your faith, you are healed.” That’s what I was trying to say before. Maybe god dose not want us to prove him with scientific evidence. Maybe he wants us to believe he created everything without putting a giant sigh in the sky saying “There is a god.” This is the point where I bring attention to that my opponent has yet to disprove a creator; he is only providing THEORYS supporting evolution. Now just because you believe in god does not mean you can’t believe in evolution. We see organisms changing every day, and in our lives. The problem with it is that our fossil record does not show a nice tree with one common ancestor. It is more like grass where there are a few branches in smaller trees but the trees are not coming all together. So evolution/ or that change in a populations genetic pool can coexist with a creator. The main point I am trying to get across is that there is not going to be a point where we can prove that there is a god, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t one. In short the theory of intelligent design is that there is a creator who made our everything. The other side is the big bang theory where first there was nothing… and then it exploded.