I'm Pro Gun: Change my Mind

Since my opponent talked about the second ammendment of constituition,heres my argument against it. 2nd argument: The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns. Gun control laws are just as old or older than the Second Amendment (ratified in 1791). Some examples of gun control throughout colonial America included criminalizing the transfer of guns to Catholics, slaves, indentured servants, and Native Americans; regulating the storage of gun powder in homes; banning loaded guns in Boston houses; and mandating participation in formal gathering of troops and door-to-door surveys about guns owned. In the June 26, 2008 District of Columbia et al. v. Heller US Supreme Court majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia, LLB, wrote, "Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited" nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms." On June 9, 2016 the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 7-4 that "he right of the general public to carry a concealed firearm in public is not, and never has been, protected by the Second Amendment," thus upholding a law requiring a permitting process and "good cause" for concealed carry licenses in California. A 2018 study found that 91% of the 1,153 court cases with claims stating a government action or law violates the Second Amendment between the 2008 DC v. Heller decision and Feb. 1, 2016 failed. Rebuttals: "I'm confused what you're trying to argue here." Compare the number of murders in countries which allow guns to countries which dont allow guns? The murder rate is so little! Take singapore as an example: As a singaporean,I hardly read any articles of murders in the past years. Versus me watching the news with my grandparents a few months ago and finding out about the nightclub situations and similar shootouts like these. "Cities that have strict gun control laws have some of the highest murder rates in the country. " You certainly havent heard of Singapore. We dont allow guns which results into less murders or no murders at all. Unless you"re talking guns like laser tag so that results into me coming back from the dead many MANY times. If you"re talking guns like laser tag guns then yes thats allowed and that"ll be a very high murder rate committed by mostly kids and teenagers. "People obtain guns illegally or should not have been able to pass a background check in the first place." Rebuttal on obtaining guns illegally: This is why guns shouldnt be allowed at ALL to prevent events like these to happen and to conduct background checks as what you mentioned later in your statement which has its flaws which I would mention in just a minute. People who illegally get firearms go to those who have firearms which they get from those who have firearms. Source:https://www.quora.com... which is why I say ban guns Rebuttal on background checks:So what if they say a leopard will never change its spots? People do change one way or another. The hardworking kid could turn into a gamer who plays 24/7. My point is:people can change one way or another. So a question you might have now is:So should cops have background checks? If so it isnt going to work as people can change and cops can be nice and become corrupted overtime. So what does a 13 year old propose? My proposal is: First do a background test. This test is to see if a cop can be corrupted. If they show signs of corruption before they become a cop,dont let them become one. For those who do pass the tests, do monthly tests on them. Same test just different times in each month. Make it random so they wont know when it comes. "in places guns were banned, the overall murder rate did not go down; Proving that a gun ban would not be effective." https://www.indexmundi.com... I know this is till 2015 but if there is a link, you can see the homicide rate decreasing or remaining the same. "I would be happy to look at your statistics you could site since you seem so sure they are by guns. " Couldnt find a link but couldnt find a link to what you said as well. "93% of gun crime is when guns are obtained illegally." And the only way to get a firearm is getting it from someone who has a firearm. Hence ban guns. "...which con has not adressed at all." Ironic isnt it? I showed you links of the death count of people in various years and you didnt do a rebuttal but still blame me that I didnt do a rebuttal on the second ammendment of constituiton. Rebuttal on second ammendment of constitution: "...being necessary to the security of a free State..." But now are guns being used to the security of a free state or threatening the security of a free state with all this gun violence going around? I have no issues on firearms being used on a tyrannical government just so you know. But the fact is that it also allows people of a free state to use it for self defence purposes not offensive. You are pro gun,suggest a way to rid of offensive uses of firearms. Apologies for not including that into my first round of rebuttals. Ladies and gentlemen also take note that when my did a rebuttal on my opponent"s statement,he counterargued every single rebuttal except that one particular one. For fairness sake,I will type the counterargument again: "Evil people choose to misuse the tool." Which is why guns should be banned to prevent "evil people"(so to speak) to misuse it." Also ladies and gentlemen notice that my opponent didnt counterargue my first argument? Which brings me to question if my opponent does have a counterargument to the argument itself.