Free Will is a Cop-out Explanation; The Brain Is Just To Complicated To Explain

I am impressed by your debauchery of improper grammar. Unfortunately the end result is not enigmatic, it is just low quality, so I will make sense of what I can and humbly ignore the rest. well fu** you too buddy now why did I type that is it because of my free will or that you made me? this was gona be a good debate but now srecw it niga ok It is unclear at what point in history we reached these stages. When did matter stop being predictable? When did life stop being predictable. I argue that it never has, but to be able to predict what life will do is curently beyond human capacity. That's why saying "humans have free will" is a cop-out. well I clear cant understand you from you missing one r when currently you are typing who can understand it?curently currently ok you be a butt musher now to the debatewell bacteria why not I think that is what you pic is trying to show i don't quite understand it but ok when god made the earth man and sext lady that would the first point this comes and the only time this would be answered (note just because i used god it could be some aliens space tacos what ever that made people gave them free will )then thisThe second intelligable point you made was that free will is the ability of a human to control their actions. You then postulated that a corrupt dictatorship may take away this free will by making people "too stuped" to think for themselves. intelligable able to be understood so if you could understand me thats greatunintelligible is what you are saying naganow again i don't know what you means i am right thank you very much intelligableintelligible unintelligiblei cant tell :) bacteria has free will is a confusing question, because we aren't sure how do define free willif so whay keep asking it? google is a good way to find outbacteria have much less intelligence than humans (it's just an obvious fact). you have not posted any proof of this so this is a statement and there is no fact only opinion A dictatorship would thus not remove free will. Dictatorship is a form of government where political authority is often monopolized by a single person or a political party, and exercised through various oppressive mechanisms.[1][2] A dictatorship is similar to authoritarianism, and differs from totalitarianism where a state that regulates nearly every aspect of the public and private behavior of its people. Dictatorships are defined by the source of the governing power and totalitarianism concerns the scope of the governing power. Dictatorship is opposed to democracy. Totalitarianism, on the other hand, opposes pluralism. Dictatorships can be legitimate or not depending on the circumstances, objectives and methods employed. 1 Authoritarianism is a form of government. It is characterized by absolute or blind obedience to authority, as against individual freedom and related to the expectation of unquestioning obedience. 2 Democracy is a form of government. No consensus exists on how to define democracy, but legal equality, freedom and rule of law have been identified as important characteristics since ancient times.[6][7] These principles are reflected in all eligible citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to legislative processes. For example, in a representative democracy, every vote has equal weight, no unreasonable restrictions can apply to anyone seeking to become a representative, and the freedom of its eligible citizens is secured by legitimised rights and liberties which are typically protected by a constitution.[8][9] 3 democracy in contrast to dictatorship or tyranny, thus focusing on opportunities for the people to control their leaders and to oust them without the need for a revolution 4 Totalitarianism or totalitarian state is a term used by some political scientists to describe a political system in which the state holds totalauthority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.[1] The concept of totalitarianism was first developed in a positive sense in the 1920s by the Weimar German jurist, and later Nazi academic, Carl Schmitt and Italian fascists. Schmitt used the term, Totalstaat in his influential work on the legal basis of an all-powerful state.[2] The concept became prominent in Western anti-communist political discourse during the Cold War era, in order to highlight perceived similarities betweenNazi Germany and other Fascist states on the one hand, and Soviet Communist Party states on the other in the usa we have this thing call the constitution and the declarationif all men are born free and equal ( born free from what? space tacos that control us?)if you are not from the USA and don't know about America you should Google it or something