Larztheloser Should be "Knighted" With the Official Title "Beast Slayer"

Excellent job NiamC. I am impressed with your arguing skills. No wonder you have over 3,000 elo.And yes, I was aware you weren't trying to troll. You accidentally trolled. Somehow. :PKeep in mind that my opponent cannot include too much new arguments within the final round, as it is common to conclude without new points within debates, I will include minimal new points within this final round. Or at least, try to.FINAL REBUTTALS1. Larz slain beasts?My opponent merely repeats her points but makes no effort to rebut my arguments over why larz has in fact slain beasts. Based on her definition of beast and her previous round's question over whether or not Larz has killed something larger than a bunny, I have fulfilled my BoP. As for my opponent's accusation of posting these messages, one, I don't know how to screen paste, two, I have yet to lie within a serious debate or anything of this sort. Sure, I have resorted to using troll arguments in a serious debates, but never have I used somebody's non-quotes to prove any of my points. Nothing suggests that I have lied. In addition, my opponent hasn't proved that you don't die a violent quick death with minimal pain if you lose a debate--you just regenerate uber-quickly, as Airmax1227 says within my previous round.2. Airmax has authority? I already proved within round 2 that Airmax has more authority on DDO than any royal person, as far as we know. Therefore Airmax is free to do whatever he likes on DDO, even if it breaks the rules of logic--"there is no such official title as 'beast slayer'", as long as he likes it. Airmax can in fact create this new "official title" which people can strive to achieve, and thus "Beast Slayer" will be an official title. As proven above, larz is definitely worthy of such title and is therefore legible for this "Beast Slayer" title. Furthermore, because of my arguments, Airmax can therefore actually give Larz the official title and Larz would officially receive it, and it would be on his profile for the whole world to see.3. My adaption? I nearly forgot to rebut this argument at first, so I'm putting this at the end of my argument. I was only trying to clear things up. Thank you for clearing things up for me.As for your role-playing, indeed, somebody role-playing dead would be supposed to have the status of being dead. At least, in that particular role-playing environment. That particular "Dead" person could still be wandering around the underworld or revive via magic potion while in a 99% hibernative state.CONCLUSION--My opponent needs to prove that I did lie, not merely possibly lied.--My opponent has yet to rebut my Beast Slayer Theory, which still 101% works--I have fulfilled my part of the BoP, while my opponent couldn't really hold onto her part and still manage to rebut my argumentsAnd so, without further ado, vote me.And Larz--cheers to you. You may not have yet meen knighted with the official title of "Beast Slayer" by Airmax as a result of debate, and you could possibly never be knighted, but I still have enough power to hereby dub thee the UNofficial title of "Beast Slayer", which the readers of this debate will know you as from now on! And no, NiamC, that is not a concession. Seriously, I said "may not", which means there is a tiny possibility in which Airmax isn't convinced of my arguments. I never said "he will not". Well yes I just said it but it's not part of my arguments and therefore it doesn't count. This was a fun debate and the kind of debate I wanted to take my mind on a break away from the World Cup while still teasing it with some arguments.THE END I hope you liked this debate and put this in your favorites! :D