The Holy Catholic Church vs Baptist

Although this is rather rude of me, I must confess I am somewhat disappointed at my opponent's responses. However, I will forge on.For starters:Con writes "My opponent is suggesting non-inspired doctrine is as good as the Bible, which is inspired. That is a false statement."How do you know the doctrine is uninspired? How do you know that the Bible is inspired? You haven't supported this claim at all. Jesus Christ is the Word made flesh, but the Bible isn't Jesus Christ (obviously), so while Jesus may be sufficient for knowledge and righteousness the Bible is not.The Holy Catholic Church has sacred tradition (2 Thessalonians 2:15) which, along with the teaching authority of the Magesterium (1 Timothy 3:15) give it its power.I would like to apologize for misspelling the title of the third contention in my last round.Ten Commandmentslol? I was quoting Exodus 20:3, which is why Exodus 20:4 wasn't there (obviously). My opponent writes some stuff saying that God let people make graven images, so really I don't see the problem here. I quoted the Jewish edition for my opponent's reading, but it appears he more or less ignored it completely. My point is, every single verse couldn't have been one of the commandments or you would have something like 17 commandments, so how people divide up those verses into ten commandments varies. The Jews would differ with your separation of their second commandment, as they rightly saw that making things that you don't worship is fine. If my opponent continues to argue this, I ask why he doesn't deem Exodus 20:9 a commandment.Idolatrylol^2? God obviously commanded the use of stone thingies in religious contexts if he ordered some made for the Ark of the Covenant (and the temple was supposed to have some too, but I can't remember the exact verse), and it's quite clear he doesn't have a problem with that, so I see no issue with the "plantation" of them in the church of God.The "don't bow down" thingy has to do with worship. If I live in Japan and I bow to my pal, does that mean I'm worshipping him as a god? Use some common sense. As the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops so wisely says "Religious worship is not directed to images in themselves".Rituals 1. PriestsCon writes "A authority the do not have in the first place as the only authority is God and His Word."So then according to you, obviously the Bible is impotent, because God's Word is Jesus Christ (John 1:1). Did you just attack your own argument? That should probably be a concession of the entire debate right there, because if you don't think that even the Bible has authority you have no metric by which to judge whether or not Catholics follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, and therefore you can never negate the resolution.2. Clergy-laitylol^3? Those were the Early Church Fathers. Since you concede that they were Catholics, that begs the apostasy question. 2 Timothy 1:11 reads "for which I was appointed preacher and apostle and teacher.". Why appoint him preacher, apostle, and teacher if everyone is the exact same? In fact, why would Jesus even pick twelve apostles if everyone is the exact same? Most likely, my opponent is wrong.3. Works and GraceThe deeds of the law were the Old Testament. Jesus himself gave us commands, and to think that he did that for absolutely no reason other than to hear himself speak doesn't strike me as sensible. That quote from the Council of Trent was to show you that Catholics put emphasis on grace, but of course you promptly ignored it and moved the goalposts.You should read the Epistle of St. James. Here are some select quotes from it:"See how a person is justified by works and not by faith alone." - James 2:24"(14) What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him? (15) If a brother or sister has nothing to wear and has no food for the day, (16) and one of you says to them, "Go in peace, keep warm, and eat well," but you do not give them the necessities of the body, what good is it? (17) So also faith of itself, if it does not have works, is dead." - James 2:14-17"Do you want proof, you ignoramus, that faith without works is useless?" - James 2:20"Be doers of the word and not hearers only, deluding yourselves." - James 1:22I could go on and on with this, but I trust my opponent gets the point.The Bible alone is an untenable positionI should have clarified that I added this contention myself. My opponent has not supported his claim that the Bible is enough with anything other than his own musings, so I ask him to do so, neither has he supported his claim that the Holy Spirit would not guide away from Biblical teaching. I believe that I have shown reasonable cause to doubt that the Bible is the sole authority, as it itself never claims that. Additionally, I would ask him if the Holy Spirit would not guide you away from Biblical teachings, why do you need him in the first place? If he's not going to tell you anything the Bible doesn't, what use is he? Regardless, I refer my opponent back to my Round 2 argument on this.To my opponent.