BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
death penalty

To keep things simple, death penalty is to be taken in the usual sense of term i. e. debt is payed(punishment) through execution(big tyrion lannister fan). Now, when we are talking about death penalty, we are talking about death penalty in the extremest of the extreme crimes, crimes which take away human dignity and/or an integral human right to such an extent that they deserve the most extreme form of punishment permissible by the state(or any other ruling authority, as the case maybe). To give some context to the above mentioned model, we are talking about crimes like rape, murder etc. Let us get one thing straight before moving forward with this debate that when we are talking about death penalty in a case, the facts of the case are as such, that it has been established that the crime committed deserves the highest level of punishment, only thing in question in this debate is whether death penalty should be the highest form of penalty there is or not. Now that we are clear to as to what this debate is to be about, let us move forward to the contentions provided by me in the favor of death penalty Contention 1 When we are talking about death penalty, we are talking about it in the extremest of the extreme crime, these crimes by their very nature are so heinous that we believe they are irredeemable and hence the committers of such crimes should be executed. Now, the reasons we believe these crimes are irredeemable is firstly, the heinousity of the crime committed makes mercy an option that"s out of the window, why it makes mercy an inconsiderable option is because such offenders shouldn"t be tolerated in the society(because of the gravity of the crime commited) and by keeping them in prison we are still tolerating them in the society, as prison might be an excluded part of the society but it is part of the society still. Secondly, Prison is ran through taxpayers money, and the purpose behind taxpayer"s money is welfare of the society and it is ridiculous to spend even a single penny of taxpayer"s honest money to shelter or feed murderers and rapists, as no probable welfare can come out of it. Contention 2 Prison is a place ran by the state, through tax payers money, now as already mentioned above, taxpayer"s money is to be used for the purposes of welfare, and such is the case even in the case of such money being spent in prison. Execution of these inhuman elements will make the prison life, much more up to the desired standard. Why the prison life needs to be up to a desired standards is because, a crime committed in prison is a crime still. Cases of prison rape and murder will come shooting down if the murderers and rapists were not a part of the prison system altogether.
god

If man is not super than a superman can not exist If superman can not exist than your argument that god=superman is invalid on the grounds that god can not be proven or dis-proven, and the absence of evidence can not be take as evidence of non-existence. I can pick up 0 sodas from the floor with my hand as easily as I can pick up 0 elephants from the floor knowing that I can not is false as I know that altering the location of 0 is no different than multiplying by 0 which leads to the same result. That being; noting is shifted or altered, thereby allowing me to shift or alter nothing freely. now only = matter to those who are in the now. To those who are than, now is irrelevant. The truth of now is based only on perspective that can not be justified by anyone who is not in the now, therefore it's relevance is subject to a single point and holds no value to the discussion.
Resolution: The theory of evolution is false according to the teachings of Islam

Clause 1:"I would first like to clarify that taking the teachings of Islam literally (much like Evangelical Christians taking the Bible literally) would obviously disagree with all the scientific evidence of Evolution via natural selection."This is the only statement/assertion made by my opponent supporting the resolution. My opponent provided no evidence or supporting arguments, and thus the assertion here does not qualify as an argument. I ask my opponent to support this assertion with evidence, and then I will establish rebuttals in round 3. Clause 2:"If you have any actual rebuttals against Evolution via natural selection and/or anything about the theory of Evolution I'd be happy to challenge you on these." Here it seems that my opponent misunderstands the resolution, and the position he accepted to argue for. I advise my opponent to review the resolution carefully, and support the assertion he made in clause 1.
Resolution: The theory of evolution is false according to the teachings of Islam

I would first like to clarify that taking the teachings of Islam literally (much like Evangelical Christians taking the Bible literally) would obviously disagree with all the scientific evidence of Evolution via natural selection. I myself have not read the Quran, therefore I am not totally familiar with the Islamic creation story. I would much prefer for this argument to be debated on scientific terms. If you have any actual rebuttals against Evolution via natural selection and/or anything about the theory of Evolution I'd be happy to challenge you on these.
Resolution: The theory of evolution is false according to the teachings of Islam

My opponent will argue for the resolution, and will assert that the theory of evolution is contradictory to the teachings of Islam. I will attempt to refute my opponents arguments using religious theology and scientific data. BOP is on my opponent. I give the opening argument to my opponent.Definitions:Evolution: the process by which life developed and diversified on earth via mutation, natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow as determined by the consensus of modern scientists.Teachings of Islam: Those found within the Quran and Sunnah, as understood by the Sahabah and the early scholars, excluding those introduced via cultural or other methods in latter centuries.
Rap Battle number 11!

I'm dumb founded my this dumb clown bjtch, what'd you say? Or you on LSD, shrooms? You make no sense, you fvckin' lame But if you ever DO make since it's probably somethin' g@y Slim Shady knock off, but at least I'm not a Minaj like Necro Acting like he's the queen of rap, yeah sure, I bet so But come to DDO and you're like Miley, you're a wrecked h0e Let's go, so what if I spit like a Jew, wasn't Jesus one? Right now I'm prayin' to him for you to please be done Well, maybe not, because slappin' you around is pleasing fun!! 26 year old, but only went to high school? Stupid ape And now you come to this fight with a clueless face, "Dude your late" for your @ss kicking, you lose debates You they hate, me they celebrate, beating you is my hobby Fvckin' Nazi, you got me aimin' an M1 at your body Shoot you dead an you gonna be like Elvis dead on the potty Your on the ground cryin' for mercy but it won't End though, bjtch But, well, if you're really hurt you can leave your death, so quit Because there's no competish anyway when you fighting NecroKid
Rap Battle number 11!

Don’t say what I should say, what I can’t say, you’re raps are g@y; you’re getting screwed in you’re ugly-@ss faceYou can’t tell me I can’t say n!gger just because of my race‘cause you’re a Slim Shady knockoff who ditched Instagram for Myspace.This is my first internet rap, I’ll admit it: It’s true,Your profile says you’re a Catholic, but you type like a Jew,And since, to this, I’m slightly new,I regret my overpowering lies in rap number one,Where I acted like God and called you my son,After this sh!t I might learn a thing or two,But If my raps were fights, you’d be all black and blue,You’re apparently okay with crushing fools, but you’re a tool,You’re so small, you almost drowned in a kiddie-pool,And my rhymes aren’t slow, dude, you took about an hour,People savour my sweet raps, they cringe ‘cause yours are sour,‘People laugh at you as your raps are few in magnitude, you got lassitude?’No man, but I have attitude; when you walk you’re all @ssitude,And It whistles from a thistle that entered you, probably a mushroom shrew; that your own step-cousin gave you.
Rap Battle number 11!

Laugh out Loud indeed, that was cute... a real hoot So you're the Pro on this debate, but you aint a pro at flow Your rhymes' at a low fvckin rate, why you go that slow? Oh, hoe, no, my ankles will be just fine, but yours? Well... I'll cross them floppy things up with lyrics so good like George Orwell "Lord, HELL" is what I ask God to give to you as soon as you pass My sword will send you there though, giving you a huge gash Lose that attitude, I got my MAC at you, won't hesitate to tap it, too People laugh at you as your raps are few in magnitude, you got lassitude? Get back, you lose, even you say your raps are nasty, Yeah, go figure Sing tragic blues as your @ss is screwed, and your white, so no "njgger"
Rap Battle number 11!

You are truly idiotic to challenge me to my own game, When we’re done here, you’ll have disgraced your whole family name. Do you honestly think that you can beat me in a rap? I’ll snap both your ankles; you’ll end up handicapped! (I’ll finish you off, quick and easy) I press a barrel to your head, you poor worthless nigger, You flop to the ground after I pull the trigger, So, try me son, If the bullets didn’t kill you, or your twisted ankles (in impossible directions) Or the gunshot in your head (sure to get an infection) It’ll be my nasty raps that will blow off your erection. LOL XD
should Standardized tests be eliminated? logical answers

Standardize testing SHOULD be eliminated. I am a Junior in a NJ high school, I'm not sure about other states, but here we take the HESPA and if you do not pass the HESPA you do not pass high school. Which I think is ridiculous because for someone like me who is smart but is bad at taking tests is not fair. Also because they are changing the HESPA to something a lot harder called the PARKK, which will be really hard to pass. And I think it's ridiculous for someone like me who gets great grades to fail high school all because I am bad at taking tests, or for someone who is bad at memorizing things. Also I don't think one test should decide our fate in society. It's like saying OK I failed the test now I can't be a doctor because I don't know how to graph inequalitys!! Please share your thoughts, logical thoughts
should Standardized tests be eliminated? logical answers

Once again, extremely valid arguments. However, I would believe that things would run similar to the ACT and SAT. When applying to colleges, most (if not all) look only at the highest score achieved over all test dates. This being the case, they would only look at the highest score on each section, which would be passing, even if it took several test dates. Also, the HSPA is used to "measure whether [the students] have gained the knowledge and skills identified in the Core Curriculum Content Standards." These scores and results are also used "to determine the appropriateness and strength of the local curriculum and to develop remedial programs to help students improve their knowledge and skills." With this knowledge, these tests are truly administered for the benefit of the students, not for acceptance decisions of colleges. Furthermore, these tests do in fact reflect situations in a post-collegiate setting. In many professions, especially those that require a higher education, there are periods of time that come with time restraints and in turn plenty of stress. One must learn to adapt to these stresses, and while a single test may not be entirely reflective of this, it does provide a certain aspect of urgency and demonstrates one's ability to perform under pressure. Sources: Same as previous round
should Standardized tests be eliminated? logical answers

Your statements are completely valid, and I agree that there are days where one simply does not test up to their ability. However, the rules for the HSPA (and I believe the PARCC) allow for retakes. Yes, there may be a day where the scores do a terrible job reflecting the academic success of a student, but one should be able to take a second, and possibly third, attempt at the test to raise their scores and become eligible for graduation. For example, while not arguing the ACT, the thought process can be transferred over seamlessly. If one scores poorly on the ACT one day, they are able to retest in order to show their true academic level. Why would this not be the same for the HSPA, especially with two additional test dates given throughout one's senior year in school? Furthermore, the HSPA only requires a student to retake the sections that have not been passed, allowing said student to focus in on sections that did not go as planned. Also, concerning the PARCC test, these claims are simply claims. Until we are positive about the passing rates and success rates of the test, we should not make assumptions about the difficulties of this standardized test. Sources: http://www.state.nj.us...
should Standardized tests be eliminated? logical answers

Yes, other standardized testing such as SAT and other forms are not so bad, they don't determine weather or not you pass from high school or not. I agree they do somewhat test you abilities but i think they should weigh so heavily on you, you could be having a bad day when the test is administered or you could be sick. But back to the HSPA we take the HSPA usually Jr. year but they are changing it to the PARK and if we do not pass we cannot graduate high school until we pass the test. Most people will pass but even my teacher this year said the PARK is so hard she doesn't think many will pass, which is ridiculous to administer such a hard test.
should Standardized tests be eliminated? logical answers

No worries about information; this is my first debate as well. Back to the discussion of standardized tests. Coming from a state where the HSPA is not given (nor required), I cannot say that I am arguing against the HSPA directly. However, with the knowledge of other standardized testing (even going so far as to include the SAT and ACT), I will argue that these tests do offer a measurement of ability. Of course, one cannot define oneself off of one score, but these tests are not designed for students to fail. Often times, even with those that have difficulty testing, many are able to achieve passing grades, or the comparative college-readiness levels. Concerning the HSPA testing, with scores ranging from 100 to 300, and a passing grade of 200, there is a high chance that many students will be able to achieve a passing level. Whether these individuals acquire a grade they are pleased with is a separate question, but when looking at the number of individuals able to pass, these numbers should be higher. Yes, I will acknowledge that testing does not come easily to all individuals, and that even the smartest of people will not test to the same ability that they show in the classroom. Yet these students should be able to test well enough to hit a passing mark. Please correct me if I am wrong or ill-informed about the HSPA test; we are not administered this test in Illinois.
Anime PlayStation and God vs Gears of war round 3

1. I have shown more proof that you have 2. "Every force you create has an echo. Your own bad energy will be your undoing." is a reference to an anime saying I'm i'm tired of your sh!t 3. I'm not dust your not grater than me true I have been cruel but all you do is fling sh!t like the F***ing monkey that you are you need to learn your place if not for PlayStation and GOW then for anime you disrespect like you know ever little detail of every anime I'm getting sick of you and your monkey sh!t learn some respect or Shut the f**k up because I will kick your a$$. And PlayStation doesn't suck you do on you moms d!ck. So stop just stop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anime PlayStation and God vs Gears of war round 3

Show me your proof. You tell me to show you proof, where's yours? My creations do have echoes for they can be heard by everyone, while as your words mean nothing to nobody. My own energy makes me stronger for I am a witch amongst regulars, I have no bad energy, for it is all just an illusion existing within our minds. All energy is what it chooses to be. There is no bad or good energy. My energy is THE energy of light and of nature. I harnest and harvest my powers of thought and of mind, while you on the other hand let it confuse you, you let it blur your senses, and you let it take your own free will from you and let it control your thoughts and perceptions. If I am bad energy, then you are but a mere dust of existence, for I am and always will be greater than you. Everyone is no one and anyone, but you my friend are just no one. You thrive on arguing with others and you grow on disagreeing with everybody. Your mere existence is just an illusion made up within everyone's minds. You come to me about being bad energy, you are NO energy. You have no energy, therefore you have no free will or thought of mind. you let your actions control you, and you let your perceptions get in the way of what you really are, just a dust of existence, if that. You think you are all that and then some, but inside of your mind you are crying for help. wishing that someone, if anyone, just once would just listen to your cries and your words. I, on the other hand have free will and perceptions. I control my own thoughts. I percieve things my own way. My words at least have an echo, your words are really just cries for help on the inside. You can't settle for being wrong for once in your life, You always have to have the right words and more. I shutter at the thought of you. I cry for you, wishing you knew what you really are. You are nothing. You are less than the dirt on the bottom of my shoe.We are all humans and we are all just mere plains and dusts of existence in the universe. There are greater things than all of us. I die a little on the inside at the mere sight of you, for you are nothing, and everything is greater than you and your existence. You need help my man, you need help.
Just questions, not a debate really

I was recently sent an e-mail with these questions. Just wanted to know what other people thought about them. Feel free to use the comment section to chine in with your opinion about any of these questions. SOME QUESTIONS NO ANSWERS Questions regarding the Iowa flooding: 1. Why aren't Hollywood celebrities holding telethons asking for help in Iowa ? 2. Why isn't the media asking tough questions about why the Federal Government hasn't solved the problem? 3.Why isn't the Federal Government relocating people to free Chicago hotels? 4.When will Spike Lee say the Federal Government blew up the levees that failed in Des Moines ? 5.Where are Sean Penn and The Dixie Chicks? 6. Where are all the people declaring that George Bush hates white, rural people? 7. How come in two weeks you will never hear about the Iowa flooding ever again? 8. Where are the free FEMA trailers for people to live in for almost 3 years? 9. Why did we not see all the looting of businesses like with Katrina?
Best NFL Current NFL Quarterback (Disregarding Injuries, etc.)

My opponent is simply wrong. Tom Brady has less experience and is less accurate, has a weaker arm and is less aware of his surroundings. My opponents valient effort was futile for everyone knows that Manning is better than Brady. My information came from ESPN player section and the NFL player section. (Online) -if Wes Welker was such a nobody why would the Patriots give 2 picks to Miami for him (Including a second round pick) -Ignoring his Oakland years where he has awful QBs and almost no offense, Randy Moss was the most consistent and high performing players in the leauge. -TD to Int ratio has nothing to do with accuracy. Accuracy is hitting a receiver in the hands while their in stride. Its not Manning's fault he has to play with ball-hawking corners like Rashean Mathis and Cortland Finnegan. Brady has to face (Insert the best CB in the AFC East here) no-name corners. -Power backs can be effective (ie "Sweetness" and Brandon Jacobs" -Brady didnt have the measurables to be selected 1st overall -QBs are affected by their defense. Amount of Possessions they have (His point is completely invalid) The CON rests his case.
Best NFL Current NFL Quarterback (Disregarding Injuries, etc.)

Obviously, my opponent believes that Manning is a product of his weapons. Is this not true for Brady? In the Patriots' superbowl years, the offense was not in the top five. It is the QB's responsibility to put points on the board. Obviously, Brady did not perform well enough to put his team in the position to win on his own. Instead, Brady relied on his defense to keep the Patriots in games. In contrast, when Manning played, his defense was ranked either last or near the bottom of the league. He had less overall Time of possesion to work with. In addition, per year, Manning touched the ball much less than Brady. As for Manning's great offensive line and Brady's porous line, Matt Light, Logan Mankins and Dan Koppen (Pro Bowlers), were all drafted before 2004. In addition, Cory Dillon of the Patriots rushed for over 1,600 yards in 2004. It is hard to believe that a line that could not allow Brady to flourish as a fantastic QB would help a RB gain 1600 yards. My opponents view on Brady's recieving core before 2007 is completely irrational. Deion Branch is a pro bowler and a Superbowl MVP. Couple his speed with a good RB like Corey Dillon and a great offensive line and a good offensive line, no wonder Brady seemed god-like. My opponent also mentions how Brady's 2007 season was the real image of Brady. The Patriots had one of the easiest schedules in the NFL, a top 5 defense, a great special teams unit and arguably the best recieving core ever compiled. Brady had possibly the best reciever who ever lived in Randy Moss, the most dangerous possession reciever in the NFL in Wes Welker and a speedy Donte Stallworth for deep routes. If anything, Brady was a product of the team. When Manning had his record-breaking season, he didn't have a top 10 defense, a great special teams or two proven deep options. (Reggie Wayne was still developing in 2004) My opponent completely ignores half of my critera and thus he cannot even argue his case if he has no response for my case. My opponent fails to realize Manning's great football intellect as he doesn't realize everything that sophisticated defense trys to do in response to an offense. There is a reason Brady doesn't call his own plays as often as Manning. As for my opponent's futile attempt to compare Brady to Manning in measurable, I will say this- Manning was the first pick in the draft. Brady was 199th. Scouts must have liked Manning's measurables. Whn I said accuracy is determined by accuracy, I meant accuracy is determined by completion percentage. However, because Manning and Brady have similar numbers in this category, we must examine film. If one looks at Brady's spiral on the long ball as well as the intermediate and short passes, it is slightly erratic. Manning's is "the tightest spiral the NFL has ever seen" according to ESPN.