The existence of God is plausible

Haha now there's the fighting spirit I was hoping to see! OK so I would like to clear the air here. My goal in this debate is to provide enough evidence to show that gods existence is PLAUSIBLE. It is impossible to prove the existence of god to be true or false. It is neither falsifiable, or possible to prove. This is why the burden of proof must be shared. At the beginning of this argument I stated that I will not be arguing about religion. Purely for the existence of god. However, many of my opponents arguments rest on religious contentions. The reason I do not want to argue religion is because every religion has there own idea's about god, and his nature. What I'm about to do is sure to infuriate my opponent. I would like to propose a crazy hypothesis. WHAT IF GOD IS ENERGY? Energy with conscientiousness. This simple theory would answer all of my opponents questions. I will refute Con's arguments one at a time: - "God makes it a point to let humans know that humans are special, that we are the pinnacle of His creation [1]. Self awareness is above all one of the highest forms of intelligence and one that is currently one of the rarest. Sharing this trait with other creatures severely lessons our stats as being the pinnacle, as we aren't the only ones who are aware of ourselves." The problem here is it relies on the Christian religious contention that only humans are special. It is also irrelevant to the point of this debate. Yes i agree, other animals display signs of self awareness. - "God created matter. This breaks the laws of conservation of energy God is omnipresent. This violates the laws of E=MC^2 God is omnipotent. This violates the entire process of time as we know it. God is not detectable by any means. This simply violates all logical understanding of science, as everything thus far has been detectable in one way or another, even if we have yet to physically see or identify it." All of these arguments can be negated if god IS energy. Energy is all powerful, it is the driving force behind everything. It is everywhere all at once. It is measurable and detectable. -Why does God no longer show himself when He actively was showing Himself pretty consistently in the bible? Isn't it more likely that he never existed and people hallucinated or imagined it? Yes it is more likely, but this rests on a Christian religious contention. -Why were miracles common place in the bible and simply do not exist or are easily shown to be fraud now? Is it likely that miracles never happened and people either lied or simply did not understand what was happening? It is far more likely that people simply didn't understand what they where seeing. Once again, this argument rests on the Christian view of God. -What created God? What created the Big Bang? Energy. -Where is God? Everywhere. So is energy. -How does God last forever? This violates many laws of energy Not if god is energy. -How is God everywhere? This violates many laws including nothing being able to move faster than light Not if god is energy. -How does God know everything including the future? As I have demonstrated earlier, this would assume a deterministic future, a future which negates the existence of free will. If free will is true, then it would be impossible predict the future. (It would however be possible to see every possible outcome) -How is God capable of doing anything? This requires tremendous energy Because to do anything would require energy. -How is God simply undetectable? This logically doesn't make sense Energy is detectable. -How does God circumvent physics? Physics is the study of energy. -If a god did exist, is it more likely that it does not display any of the qualities we have given it? (aka not omnipotent, not omnipresent etc) Certainly. It is very possible that humans simply do not have the capacity to understand the nature of god. Would this negate the existence of god? No. The "double slit experiment" has shown that light seems to be aware when it is observed. Modern quantum physics has absolutely no idea why this happens. So it is very possible that energy contains some form of consciousness. I am sure that my opponent will accuse me of changing the definition of god. Here I show that this is simply not true. My opponents definition of god is this: An all powerful, all knowing deity. Well by my hypothesis, God is energy with conscientiousness. Energy by definition is all powerful. It is the driving force behind everything. A conscious energy that emanates throughout the universe would then consequently be all knowing. My This type of god would be all powerful and all knowing. So in fact I have not changed the definition of god. In regards to machine sentience: Machines can indeed read faces, recognize music, and imitate conscious behavior. But consciousness involves sensation. It involves feeling and seeing and imagination. While a computer can be trained to observe pattern based on binary code, it does not actually see or hear or feel anything. I argue that conscientiousness cannot be artificially created. The reason I assert this point is because the Atheist view of conscientiousness stems from a kind of biological machine. A series of chemical reactions should not attain conscientiousness. Not only do we not understand how this works, we don't understand why it's there in the first place! There is no evolutionary basis for sentience. Wouldn't a cold calculating biological robot do a much better job in surviving nature? In regard to free will: Free will and evaluating a situation are not the same thing. Free will also means that the future cannot be determined. Summary: My goal in this debate was to demonstrate that god's existence is plausible. I have offered a theory that demonstrates that god is theoretically possible. In this view of the universe, god is energy with sentience. The future cannot be determined with certainty, because all conscious beings have free will.