Anarchy is the true means of liberty

"In anarchy (the one she propose), the group as a whole should come to an agreement of what the state of anarchy is, because if it doesn't happen so, the person or group (not whole) to start the anarchy will dictate what the state of anarchy is, which wouldn't be anarchy." -ConAn Anarchy would most likely start among fellow Anarchists in a small town. The way it would work would be that everyone in the town would get together in meetings and decide how things would run. The people as a whole would generally come into agreement of the state of anarchyI pretty much do have an idea of everyone as a whole deciding together how they want things to run. Everyone basically wants the same thing in life whether you believe it or not. "You yourself know very well what you want, and so does your neighbor. You want to be well and healthy; you want to be free, to serve no master, to crawl and humiliate yourself before no man; you want to have well-being for yourself, your family, and those near and dear to you. And not to be harassed and worried by the fear of to-morrow. You may feel sure that every one else wants the same. So the whole matter seems to stand this way: You want health, liberty, and well-being. Every one is like yourself in this respect. Therefore we all seek the same thing in life. Then why should we not all seek it together, by joint effort, helping each other in it? Why should we cheat and rob, kill and murder each other, if we all seek the same thing? Aren't you entitled to the things you want as well as the next man? Or is it that we can secure our health, liberty, and well-being better by fighting and slaughtering each other? Or because there is no other way? Let us look into this. Does it not stand to reason that if we all want the same thing in life, if we have the same aim, then our interests must also be the same? In that case we should live like brothers, in peace and friendship; we should be good to each other, and help each other all we can. But you know that it is not at all that way in life. You know that we do not live like brothers. You know that the world is full of strife and war, of misery, injustice, and wrong, of crime, poverty, and oppression. Why is it that way then? It is because, though we all have the same aim in life, our interests are different. It is this that makes all the trouble in the world."http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu...People as a whole all have the same aims in life, but because of how unfairly the system is run, we have different interests. Since the wealthy profit from the system by always getting more and more and more, their interest is to continue profiting by stealing from the laborers. This conflicts with the interests of the poor who want a decent house and food to survive. While the poor want to get more fair wages and more decent hours, the wealthy want to keep robbing from the laborers which creates corruption and confliction. Since all our aim is the same, than why do we have conflicting interests? Because of the system that creates these conflicting interestsSince everyone wants freedom and well being, than why can't Anarchy work for the whole who want peace, eqality and well being? "So unless my opponent know of such time that the state of anarchy existed in such of way, and gave the answers based on such state of anarchy, I don't see how I can take her answers into account."- ConExamples of Anarchy working (Although a lot of them had to end because of outside circumstances trying to get rid of the anarchist communities unfortunately):Freetown ChristianiaHome, WashingtonLife and Labor Commune Stapleton ColonyTrumbullplexetc.Yes we are very different, but we more similar than we believe. Humanity all has the same goals in life but they have conflicting interests. Interests were created by society and inequality. So if we live in a community where we are equal and not hindered by authority, we have extremely similar goals in how the society would work. Which is why making decisions in the community would not be difficult as we have very similar goals we can agree on easily. We are all different yet we are all the same. We are all human beings who bleed, and cry, and need love from friends and family to be happy. We all want happiness and freedom. We all want equality and to be treated fairly. We all want to live comfortably and to coexist equally. We all want to be accepted and appreciated for our difference and also to work together toward our similar goals. We all want freedom of oppression and goodwill to man.That is what we wantThere would be absolutely no reasons to commit crimes as everyone has want they want and need. The Government:Yes I agree that it would be less convenient with a bigger population but the community will decide how the decisions would be made together with more convenienceYes the problems I stated is because the people who run the government system are corrupt as well as the natural system. "The problems you stated, is not because of the government system, is because of the people who runs it, and yet you propose more people to run the system, meaning all of us."-ConHow does "more people" as in "us" equate with the type of people that run the system?? The people that run the system don't generally care about the well being of people. They are more interested in the benefits of power and wielding it than actually trying to help the people coexist in equality and peace. How are a bunch of millionares who haven't experienced a day in a mill or hard labor, or a streak of poverty, or starvation, or pain, possibly what is right for the people than the people themselves??"I think politics should be eliminated, and proper personal should be the ones trusted to run the government. Meaning, people who actually know what they are doing, and fit for the job, those jobs should require qualifications. Most politicians are all talks, and are good at convincing people."-ConQualifications don't mean anything in a corrupt system. That's like saying that you need "qualifications" in order to gamble with the people. It doesn't change anything at all. A system that is naturally corrupt isn't really going to stop being corrupt by a few restrictions that politicians can always get around. "This makes me think... a group of people in the anarchist state, could very well convince people of their ideology, that could create a corruption on the system put in place."-ConYou can argue that about any ideology in the universe. True that it's possible but it's possible with any ideologyAnarchy if genuinely practiced is completely uncorrupt in nature"This was like the only question I truly wanted to be answered, so I thank you for this. The two first things could be achieved, the bold part would be very unlikely. Again, the bigger the population, the most unlikely it would be."-ConThe bigger the population the more difficult it would be, but you seriously cannot prove that it cannot work. All of your answers have been assertions