The Ten Commandments should be the basis of our Laws

I do talk about religion for this reason only to use as a minor example. I was comparing that each one including my own practice has a moral code or some belief associated to contentment that people follow. A moral code is of the law for which one or society accepts into their own countries and so passed down through generations whether or not that be some legislative paper or by voice, to where they relied on something more in the past. So if you said the ten commandments shall not be part of the law or neither they will be, one is incorrect as I to agree with the statement that indeed they might not be. Note: I had put this statement against Cornelius that the law indeed is a structure of what other people fear because it is taken out of context and others do not want to live by it but make their own way. However if some read me correctly based on the fact round 1 was hard to explain let me make it simple. If so the ten commandments are relative to a law for which others took into practice to that of how civilization builds itself among history, to that of how we treat others, so then those words of the law be found true besides those who abridge it or take for granted the chance to break the law or make the world a total mess through the twisting of them. If one needs an enforcer to edit the legislative and other branches, one can indeed see reason though this is not a separation of church and state, but for law to intercede or combine with educational to life principles. The fact that one man flees from an argument such as this, I do not blame the man. If I had been a liar I would have let the comment or round slide here without actually giving it some thought onto what was a first generation or so century standard to that of its future for which the world progresses through an order or by stability factors. I am not here to compare universal law but explain a flaw to the statements about the ten commandments not being a part of the law below. If you believe being a liar to the courts or higher to lower is the right thing to do, one is a transgressor of the law system. If one believes all violence is right that we should kill a man, then would there not be punishment whether good or bad consequence? Are we forced to respect our parents or do we as children of much try to honor them through what they taught us as a part of us in a family? Yes, some of you grew up without or had neglect, but that is no reason to dis-acknowledge the world around them unless one hated the fact of existing. If one read my explanation for not stealing they would understand that people have ownership rights to that of a claim but hear me when I say that if it does not belong to you unless worked for in society it will so happen that is breaking the rules of a civil matter and leads to issues unless otherwise one was clueless and accused a false accusation by another. Should I gain a profit for something I stole? Hence the truth would better suit in these matters or convict most of us even with law abiding standards knowing the public cheated and ignored truth virtues. I do not understand the Lord's name in vain unless one curses the ground to that of have anger with ones shame. Even those of other sides of the world would understand this with a proper translation. We must remember the rest of the law relates to the ancient laws or to acknowledge a Lord higher than a man and I am not to claim myself that unless one were against what I had explained here with my lecture. Judicial system = you are telling me deals with the Supreme Court and are enforcers of the 4 branches of law, but even they go by the laws of the land to that of its people to that of its history; to protect the constitutional right and up-hold what most of some Americans had held as true virtue to that of colonial days. I will not go look up the law and the history of it to that of its founding principles all over again as they state that the constitutional laws are somewhat similar based. If so I am wrong about the judicial system though I was given a small definition or description of it, so yes I can acknowledge being a little wrong, then show me where exactly I messed up besides saying that if you throw a cross into the system the law or describe Christianity or your own belief that people may persecute for it. I do not blame the people here or anyone but I find it ignorant they could change the law to that of hide its history, to that of extend it so great that no man could read it and yet people tell me from ten commandments and such the bible will never be a part of the law. History lesson! Exodus, we all remember Egypt, Mesopotamia the tale or history of one named Hammurabi, though yet which of those laws were in the book of the Bible? What about Moses on MT Sinai? - Feel free to read round 1. I will not flee. It is better of me to admit the truth rather than fall by slandering of the law and keep history with hypocrisy.