Eastern Europeans Should be Purged

Ok I will start by saying yes, I may have said that I am not completely against purges, butI am against this version of it. I stand by what I said, and I will try to back up my stance. Population Control One of her aguements is about population control. Now what she is saying is that the population of the world is becomeing to large. Now yes that is somewhat true, but humanity always finds a way to live, and thrive. We are not going to die out due to population increases, it is only natural. The world has become a bigger place in a sense. We have started to reach out around the world, we buy and sell different products. Humanity haa been expanding across the world, and it has to happen. The population increase is due just natural. Also killing people in eastern europe may help things in the short term, but the world population would still increase. Humans can easily reproduce, and that is a fact. There is no way to stop us reproduceing, it is just a way of life. Proverty Now he brings up a point about the proverty levels in eastern europe. He says that they are way to high, hurts all of europe. Yes proverty is a major problem in some nations, but it is also in many other nations. We should not kill them off just because we can. It might help us in the the short term, but in the long term people would look down on us for mass killings. Also some of those nations are in the EU or other Organisations. Those people in those countries would hate us afterwards. Also aren't we better then that? Has humanity fallen to a new low, would you kill other humans without a second thought just for your own personal gain. Yes economies might go up, but the better option would be to stop given them money, or kick them out of the EU. Also there are tons of other poor nations, most nations are third would countries not major developed nations. So if that happened then say by to most of Aficia, most of Asia, and parts of Central, and South America. This would just be one more step to the mass killing of millions. If that happened what could happen to the poor in your country, who knows maybe the next step is puting them in front of a execution squad. How would you feel if that was your country. Method Now the method she said is just plain evil. She would want to use nucks to kill them nice and fast. She also said that it would only be in the rural areas. Now you know nucks kills everyone there, but there is a catch, nucks give off radiation. This raditation would spread, now usually that should not be to big of a problem. But you are saying to nuck large areas of land, and that is in the rural areas. For one most rivers and other bodies of water are in such rural areas. So if that happened, then you cou'd no longer drink water from that water supply. Also any wildelife in those areas would contain radiation. This would make it so you can not eat them. Also again sense your plan would need a large amount of nucks to go off, the radiation would spread in the country to cities due to air currents. Also it could spread to other countries. Also it would cost a lot more to do this, then you would have gained from doing it. Now I will try to defend what I said. When I said it would start a war I did not mean the countries you attacked. By then those countries would be long gone. I ment the radiation could spread into other nations, such as Russia. So they might declare war just on that. But if you did that then I am amount prostive you would be at war with Russia soon. For one Russia has been more aggressive as of late. They would not take it to kindly if you landed a bunch of nucks in Ukraine, or Serbia. Russians also help Serbia, and they back up Ukrainian rebles, Russia has been helping those rebles. So attacking Ukraine would mean war with Russia, and if Russia attacks you then most likely Chinia will join Russia. Also there would be the public backlash if you did such a action. They would worry about their kids future, and they would fear for their well been. Many all ready stand strongly against nucks being used. If you used it in that way then you would be at war with many different countries. Also you people would start to fear you, now yes you would do that for a good reason, but they might not look to kindly with a sudden million people dieing just like that. I said you would be at war with Nato, now maybe not Nato but you would be attacked by someone, and now a days everyone has some sort of ally. Also with Russia most likely they would attack. Also I ask how international organisations would reposd to this. People have not seen nucks lanch like that sence ww 2, and some what the cold war. The world has changed and that simply would not be allowed to happen. Someone somewhere would stand against you, and once you did that they would respond in kind. Now I hope you understand, and I shall stand by what I said. No matter how good your reasoning is, someone somewhere will attack you in kind. Also the stress between the poor, and the middle class, and the rich would worsen. Once that happens there would be no turning back form that one point. History would see that as a mass killing of the poor. Now back to you pro