Evolution is wrong

Evolution is the foundation for the many scientists we hear about, the many shows we watch, and the many text books we read. All of them sound so sure and make evolution sound like a fact. How could everyone be wrong? They couldn't could they? Think, is evolution a fact or a false theory? I will start from the being. Life is often portrayed as spontaneously arising from some sort of "primordial soup". There it is ... quiet, tranquil, warm nutrients in a primitive sea, a lightning strike in the distance is imparting the energy of life, Bam! Our atmosphere consists mainly of oxygen (21%) and nitrogen (78%) and is called oxidizing because of chemical reactions created by oxygen. For example, iron is oxidized to form iron oxide. This could be problematic for self assembling molecules and cells. Oxygen reacts with some of the necessary chemicals for life like amino acids and sugars react with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water. If there is oxygen, there would be no amino acids, sugars, purines, etc. Evolutionists propose a "reducing" atmosphere with no oxygen. The problem is the ozone layer. without it no life. This is a interesting problem (one of the many) many evolutionist fail to mention. Atmosphere with oxygen= no life Atmosphere without= no life. For life to happen you need sugars, amino, perines, ect... For all this to bond there needs to be energy. Sadly, the energy that makes these bonds would most likely destroy the atoms or life. For life you need DNA and RNA but in a ocean the chemicals to make this would react with eachother in counterproductive ways. The main problem is even if you had everything in the right conditions how would you get the needed sequence for DNA? You need a exact sequence. The odds of that happening are 10 with a 130 zeros behind. Finally there is the cell. We all know its vast complexity but how do you get atoms form the cell? How do you get it all to work at the same time. It either all works or nothing will work at all. The proto cell is a cell that can make mistakes but even the smallest mistakes can reak havic on biological life. These are some of the many holes surfacing in evolution under the microscope of science. Darwin stated that if no fossils could be found then his theory would be false. We have probably all heard this at one time but seriously think about it. how many missing links have scientists recovered for animals and humans? If this was a slow and gradual consistent prosses dont you think there would be half reptial half mammal fossils? And I am not talking about some hoax like java man that are not even from the same animal or glued together by some guy as a joke like piltdown man. If evolution did happen there would be lots of fossils like we have today. Evolution is filled with holes like the cambrian explosion. If cells slowly evolved then wy do we see a explosion of fossils and animals just all of a sudden. It would be like watching a 24 hour movie and for the entire time you se nothing but a few worms and jelly fish and then in the last hour thousands of animals just apear. With all these flaws and odds ading up against evolution It can no longer be called a fact but a fake created by some amateur geologist who noticed the ability for animals to adapt to there environment. This is called microevolution. Not even darwin believed in his own theory at death. Evolution is a faith. It takes a huge leap of faith. Evolution is wrong. I am looking forward to your response.