The Biblical God is more credible than the other religions' gods.

But God had no problems with the Old Testament as we can see in many parts of the New testament: -This proves there were problems.... otherwise there would be no New Testament. If he could have removed sin in a less painful way, then how would it have been truly meaningful? Also, if He removed sin (evil) there would only be good, leaving no room for Free Will. He's not angry with people for sinning, he's disappointed that they continue to keep their blinders on and do not choose to seek repentance from that sin. The new testament doesn't fulfill any prophecies because it was created to do so -First of all, this sentence is incoherent. "Doesn"t fulfill" and "was created to do so"? I'll assume what it says and go off of that. So the New Testament was not created to fulfill any prophecies? Then why was it created? Hence words "Old" and "New". By saying that, you're saying "We have new laws put in place, but they aren't meant to change from the old laws". Then why was it created? If it weren"t created to fulfill and change the Old law then it would all just be called Old Testament. The New testament was created in a way it would fulfill the prophecies of the first. -So you claiming the New Testament has no point above and then right here, you're saying that it was created for the first. First, meaning 1. Old and New, 1 and 2. So your statements are a contradiction. . Also,his sacrifice would be meaningless because his pain was temporary and limited,and in 3 days he resurrects. Hell is eternal,unless he got to hell,the sacrifice had no meaning,because according to the bible he resurrects and gets back to heaven. Also,he even knew he was going to be killed. -So because pain is temporary that makes it meaningless? Then by that logic working out would be meaningless. The pain, the burn and soreness do not mean anything because it only lasts a little while? We know that's false because becoming stronger, healthier, tougher all comes after that pain. Pain teaches you things you otherwise would not know. I've already provided you with why his sacrifice was meaningful, but since you neglected it I shall say it once more. His sacrifice was for all of mankind, so that we would be able to have forgiveness and salvation without being held accountable to living a perfect life, because that's impossible. And how is him knowing he was going to be killed relevant at all? Did that fact of knowledge change the outcome? No. And also how was his sacrifice meaningless since it"s the 21st Century and were all still talking about that? God created sin and he not being able to destroy it just makes he not omnipotent. What also makes him not omnipotent is he not being able to be around us. -Already addressed that first sentence above. So, because he "didn't" destroy it, that makes him less omnipotent? If a bulldozer drives by a tree, but leaves it standing, does it mean that it's not powerful enough to do so? No. It means it's a choice. And how exactly does the ability to be, or not to be, around someone give or take away power in which that person possesses? He didn't pay the price as i explained before and there was better ways to show grace and mercy. What about appearing in the clouds and say "I am the almighty living God and i love you all,and because of this i will forgive all your sins." and then cure every disease and remove sin from the hearts of people?" -You didn't explain anything, just threw empty statements at it. You say there's a better way to show grace and mercy, so what is this better way? Doesn"t granting us redemption and salvation when we choose to believe in him, despite all the sinful acts against him, show us enough? Him appearing in the clouds? That would defeat the whole purpose of faith and believing. God created humans with brains and intelligence, he also gave us the Bible so that, put two and two together, we could open our eyes and see the truth about him. If there's any reason why that's not understood it's solely based on the individual not choosing to accept that and understand it. Once we accept that we are sinners, ask for forgiveness, and he comes into our lives the sin is "removed" . That changes the heart. Sin is not a tangible thing, you can't just grab it and throw it away. When we ask God into our hearts, he comes in and the transformation begins. Just like when you have a glass of water and squeeze dye into it, it spreads through the water, changing it. Then, when we do sin, we feel it (God conscience), acknowledge it and seek repentance through Christ. Done deal. God does send people to hell,because he create them knowing they would go to hell in the future,because he knows every outcome of your decisions,and he knows what decisions you will make because he is omniscient. -Again, I already addressed this false claim earlier. Please read with the intention of understanding. Just because he's omniscient, doesn't mean he's forcefully making you choose what you do. That would make everyone a bunch of robots. I knew the arguments you were going to make but was I the one making you make them? No. And being held up for your money, yes, just like this you have 2 choices. Give the mugger the money or don't. Two choices and two outcomes. God never said both outcomes would be enjoyable. If parents do punish their children,what i don't think it is a good way of teaching,they do it because they want them to learn that what they did is wrong,but there is no way to learn with hell,because it is eternal. -You don't agree with punishing your child when they do something bad yet you go on to say punishment is for their own good to learn what they did was wrong. So you believe that we should all stay in the dark and not gain knowledge when we make an error? You don't have to go to hell to learn this. Since God created us with brains we can make a pretty certain inference of what will happen since we have a lifetime of learning this concept. Unless of course like you said, no one should learn this. You don't have to cut your throat in order to know the consequences of that. You can use your own judgment from the lifetime of experiences and knowledge that you've obtained to see the consequences of those actions. If he were to remove you after the fact you would learn that what you did was wrong,there is no point of keeping you there forever. That' s what a punishment is. Imagine if jail was eternal,even if what you did was only steal a candy?Would it be fair? -I"m glad you brought up the jail analogy, gives me a better way to explain it different from how i did above. Jail CAN be for life if a person continues to do wrong. If you do some wrong things, you get warnings. If you continue doing them, the punishment becomes more severe because obviously the lesson was not learned the first hundred times you did it. You don't go to hell because you do one bad thing or a thousand bad things. You go there if you don't turn from your ways and accept Salvation. "The Cambrian explosion has nothing to do with apes or mankind,it was a lot of time before. You are interpreting it wrong.""I provided a lot of different theories to why it would happen,all with evidence." -You said "increase in oxygen that happened, the formation of the ozone to shield the earth from UV rays" That's not a theory it's a fact. You provided no evidence; I however did by telling how that happened. I gave you tangible, irrefutable evidence that even historians acknowledge; yet you try to keep saying it's false. Also,that site was found in 1959[3].Also,that site itself said that Ron Wyatt had no knowledge of geology and that geologists recognized that site as just a geological formation. -Again your site and the correct site are completely different sites. Please, read above. 1959 is before 2014 so that's irrelevant. What they found recently regarding Noah"s Ark in a different place with actual proof is the only thing relevant to this debate, please read above. Seems as if I do not have enough characters on here left, and the ones I do i'm not going to squander on, in order to refute your continued false claims. But then again, I don't need them because I have already addressed and refuted them and made them clear with empirical evidence above. You're basically saying the exact same things you said above, blatantly ignoring their fallacious quality. Which is telling me that you are not fully acknowledging what is being said. You are talking in incoherent circles in many of your paragraphs. How do you know your God is the right one,what if to other religions,your hope is that Vishnu doesn't exist?You hold the BoP,you must show me what your religion has that the other ones don't. - "The difference between Christianity and every other faith in the world is that all other religions are about man trying to reach up to God. Christianity is about God reaching down to man." Just this. Christianity is the ONLY belief where we can have salvation by the acceptance of Christ. We do not have to prove ourselves and live perfectly, which is good since it's impossible, yet in ever other religion it says in order to have salvation you must do good works (who says when you have done enough?), it"s all based on your works and you if you don"t measure up well then BAM! You're out. You don't even know when your "saved" in any other religion until death where you figure out it was false, and by then it's too late. So why is that? Because man makes them in order to control you. To keep you aiming at something unattainable. True Christianity does not do that because it is about having a loving relationship with the Lord. With Christianity it is about love and acceptance. It is a come as you are, with all the filth and sin, and accept him into your life. Thats it. People talk trash about God because they cant understand that