The Harry Potter book series is better than the Twilight book series.

I will present my case, but please note that I will never devote an entire point as an attack to Stephanie Meyer or the Twilight series, I beg my opponent to do the same.Now, on to my contentions:1. JK is not afraid to sacrifice the good guys.Simply enough, in the Harry Potter series we see "the good guys" die. Sirius, Harry's godfather dies in book 6, and Fred Weasley dies in book 7. In the Twilight series, I have yet to see the truly good characters die. While JK makes her books so much more realistic by showing the readers that not everyone good always lives, and not only the bad die. Having more realistic scenarios in a book provides the reader with the truth. While Stephanie Meyer is good in her intentions of letting the good guys live and the bad guys die, it gives the reader the impression that this is true in the world. Even in a fiction or fantasy book, there is always some truth. Clearly, this is not the truth that Stephanie Meyer shows. Because JK Rowling does, Harry Potter is better than Twilight.2. JK researches her material.More historical similarities seem to be made in the Harry Potter series. Thus, the series as a whole is more informational. The historical similarities in Harry Potter urge the readers to research. Though Stephanie Meyer makes some references to the myths of vampires and werewolves, JK does this more. By using spells rooted in the Latin language, JK influences her readers to learn more about the language instead of just pushing it aside. I for one did not push aside the names of the spells, I was curious, as were many other readers and researched the spells and all other Latin rooted references and myths about the creatures in the series.3. JK wrote a whole imaginative world that goes further then her 7 books.JK has taken her books farther than just the 7 base books. She wrote "The Tales of Beadle the Bard" and other side books that are mentioned in the series. This extends the entire subject on and adds to the creativeness of the series as a whole. Giving the readers the books that are referenced in the main series, JK gives them more initiative to read in general, and deepens the entire point of the series. Useless book titles in a series does not get the reader to be more proactive about reading and gaining new information on the general subject of the series. In the Tales of Beadle the Bard we learn many of the stories that are told about inside the books, and it becomes more useful and entertaining.4. The writing is just better.The tag-line says it all. In this point however, I will argue both the literary value (style of writing) and the general writing as a whole. Twilight is written poorly, and we all know it. If you need any sources, please read the books. Twilight is also written in first person, only allowing the reader to get inside of the head of the main character, Bella. Now, even though none of us want to be inside her head anyway, Stephanie Meyer allows us to look into her thoughts and motives. However, Harry Potter is written in third person, allowing the reader to get into all of the characters head from an angle that is not though another character's eyes and opinionated. We can see all the hidden motives of the characters and are able to learn more about them in general because of this.5. Harry Potter is not predictable and JK Rowling ties all knots and answers all questions.The Harry Potter series leaves the readers on the edge of their seat as if they were watching a movie or a sporting event that they love. It is less likely for a person to predict what will happen next in the Harry Potter series than it is in the Twilight series. From the beginning of the first book the readers had no clue that Tom Riddle had split his soul into 7 pieces and all of them needed to be destroyed to kill him. The readers of Twilight however knew that the bad guys would come back to seek revenge, and that the chance of a big war/fight in the end was what was going to happen.I will present more arguments in the next round, and am looking forward to Con's case and rebuttals.