Our Reality Was Possibly Caused by a Being That Can Be Defined As God

I appreciate the Contender, V5RED, accepting the his/her roll in this debate with me.I want to point out some things before I type out my argument. One: I do not expect to convince you that god exists in any way. Two: My goal is to show that reality according to Quantum and Digital Physics has opened a more experimental approach to the possibility of something that can be roughly defined as 'god'.What I want to demonstrate in my argument is this1.) Local Realism is false and Quantum Mechanics has demonstrated this.2.) Quantum Mechanics (weirdness) applies to everything.3.) There are ways in which you can attempt to falsify this via showing Bells Inequality has not been violated.4.) The universe is computable (i.e. information).5.) The universe is likely a hologram, and we can test this.6.) The information that makes up our universe is being processed by a mind."Quantum experiments hint at a worldview that has not yet been grasped. The existence of something beyond what we usually consider physics " beyond what we usually consider the "physical world".- The Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness1.) Local Realism is false and Quantum Mechanics has demonstrated this.Quantum mechanics began its tests with particles (i.e. electrons, protons, etc.)The particles (or matter) behaved like waves of probability when not being measured, and like balls of matter while being measured.( http://physics.mq.edu.au...;)( http://physics.about.com... )( http://web.mit.edu... )This implied either that the detectors were screwing up the results, or that matter is not really as stable as we originally thought it was.The results of experiments seemed to show that matter is dependent on observation, or 'measurement', to exist in any defined location.We also found that two particles connected by Entanglement can somehow communicate with each other instantaneously at any distance in space. This phenomena was called "spooky action at a distance" by Albert Einstein.Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (Later known as the EPR Paradox) came together to find a 'local hidden variable'. This hidden variable is something that would connect the particles somehow to show that reality wasn't as "spooky" or strange as the experiments were implying.( http://www.drchinese.com... )Other experiments were devised to remove the problem of the detectors in order to show that it wasn't the detectors causing the problem.The Delayed Choice Quantum Erasure proposed by Scully and Dr M6;uhl in 1982 ( http://arxiv.org... ) ( http://einstein.drexel.edu... ), was the experiment that drove us further down the rabbit hole.The experiment succeeded in showing that the detectors played no role in the interference and clump patterns shown by the particles.However, local realism has been violated:http://phys.org...;(All loopholes have actually been successfully closed recently)http://www.pnas.org...;http://journals.aps.org...;2.) Quantum Mechanics (weirdness) applies to everything.The data has been done for large enough objects to see with the naked eye. As the experiments use larger and larger subjects, physicists no longer doubt the results will be the same.Time moves along less like an analog clock and more like a digital clock with individual, computable states. Each state containing a specific amount of informationAs the experiment is scaled up in size, at some point quantum behavior (interference) should give way to classical behavior (no interference). But how big can the particles be before that happens?Quantum Mechanics shows that not only particles are defined by interference, but much larger objects as well. The results repeat no matter how large the object being used in the experiments.Quantum Interference is shown in large organic molecules -http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...;Imaging of the experiment, as well as the equipment used:http://www.nature.com...;Leggitts Inequality:http://arxiv.org...;3.) There are ways in which you can attempt to falsify this via showing Bells Inequality has not been violated.If you can show that Bell's Inequality has not been violated, you will win a Nobel Prize:The Quantum Randi Challenge: http://arxiv.org...;Bell"s Inequality:http://www.nature.com...;http://www.nature.com...;4.) The universe is computable (i.e. information)This fourth premise is highly supported by several different forms of data. However, I am going to focus on one in particular.Our universe is purely made of information. Much like your computer screens can show virtual worlds like Minecraft or The Sims, our universe acts similar.Theoretical Physicist Sylvester James Gates has discovered, at the very base of our universe, computer code. This computer code is made of bits of "ones" and "zeros". Our universe is made of binary code.James Gates Essay on Adinkras:http://www.onbeing.org...Physical Review:http://arxiv.org...This is a clip of James Gates explaining his discovery:This leads many to the notion that we are, in some way, a hologram of projected data.And we have evidence for this. Which leads to my next premise:5.) The universe is likely a hologram, and we can test this.Physicists such as Yoshifumi Hyakutake and colleagues of Ibaraki University in Japan have previously provided convincing evidence for the idea of holographic universes:http://arxiv.org..."In this article we provide the first quantitative evidence for the gauge/gravity duality at the level of quantum gravity. We perform Monte Carlo simulation of the dual gauge theory in the parameter regime that corresponds to a quantum black hole. Our results agree precisely with a prediction for an evaporating black hole including quantum gravity corrections. Thus we find that the dual gauge theory indeed provides a complete description of the quantum nature of the evaporating black hole."The evidence provided by the Physicists at Ibaraki University of Japan show that the information that is projected into a black hole by information at the edge or the "event horizon", actually occurs at a cosmic scale.http://arxiv.org...- Yoshifumi HyakutakeIs this concept testable?Absolutely. The concept is currently being experimentally tested at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.http://www.fnal.gov...;I've sent an email to FNAL with a request for the results of the experiment. The data is expected to be reviewed this year.The experiment is searching for "holographic noise" at the fundamental level."If we find a noise we can"t get rid of, we might be detecting something fundamental about nature " a noise that is intrinsic to space-time," - Fermilab physicist Aaron ChouThe noise is found by using two separate interferometers situated on top of one other. Each interferometer sends a one-kilowatt laser beam (the equivalent of 200,000 laser pointers) at a beam splitter. Then, once the light beams are split, they travel down two perpendicular 40 metre arms. Next, the light is reflected off a mirror back to the beam splitter, where the two beams finally recombine. However, during this journey, even the tiniest vibrations can interfere with the light's frequency, causing fluctuations in the brightness of light.The analysis of the light fluctuations is critical to the results of the experiment. It enables them to discover whether space itself is vibrating.These vibrations will be the "holographic noise".Other experiments are being done by a group of Physicists at the University of Washington looking for "signatures" that would indicate our universe is graph-like, much like you would use in a 3-dimensional world in a virtual system.( http://arxiv.org...;)And here's the laymen presentation of the PDF:( http://www.int.washington.edu... )6.) The information that makes up our universe is being processed by a mind.If the cosmos is information, where is the information coming from?We know that simulations of virtual realities can be processed via computers. However, in order to build a computer to process every qubit of our universe, one would need to create a computer larger than the universe itself. It's not practical and largely unnecessary to postulate.However we do know that our brains can process information much more smoothly and compactly into platonic information.The above science has shown, however, that the brain is also a part of the hologram. Therefore, the matter that makes the brain is also observer dependent. That means that the mind is fundamental and can be a separate entity. ( http://m.phys.org... )( http://www.projects.science.uu.nl... )If this is true, then our universe can more simply be explained by inferring a mind processing the universe through platonic information processing.This mind would be a cosmic mind that envelopes all of space-time in our four dimensions."What I mean by 'consciousness' is, consciousness is the one thing that cannot be an illusion."- Sam Harris