Ron Paul will be elected President of the United States in 2008.

Okay. I am prepared to debate this. I will continue my arguments about the obvious death and present new arguments. I. Why You Cannot Choose The Other Debater's Argument (Even Pre-Debate) You CANNOT choose the other person's arguments. My opponent tries to tell you and I that he doesn't want to face or doesn't think he can beat John McCain's death arguments. Well, he can't decide my argument. If this was so, every debater would do this. They would run any plan and simply say they don't want to hear winning arguments and list the arguments. All of debate would turn into this where the first debater would say what he didn't want to hear. Imagine if Bush before press conferences said "I don't want to hear that the economy is bad." I think by now we all agree on the fact that no debater can decide what arguments he wants run. That is just too much courtesy. II. The Inevitable Death Opponent>>> McCain may have had cancer, but not everyone who has cancer ends up dying from it, especially if they have already survived it once. Skin cancer is one of, if not the, most common type of cancer, and hundreds of thousands of people have lived healthy lives after beating it. Me>>> Not everyone after falling off of a building, or being in a fiery plane crash dies either. But here is a guy who won't tell us about his health and is super old. Any bloke with common sense will presume that John McCain will die, especially if he has cancer, that came back, is old and won't tell us about his health. Opponent>>> As for not publishing his medical records, why would he? He isn't required to Me>>> As a political candidate, you are expected to show thee records unless you have something to hide. Hillary hid her tax records and we found dirty money and a lot of money generally after claiming to connect so well with the poor. McCain is hiding his medical records because he is hiding something. He obviously has no provacy issues. He's running for president and showed his tax records. Opponent>>> Ron Paul has stayed in much longer [than Huckabee] Me>>> But he got so much attention about how long he stayed in, the GOP is sick of him. Opponent>>> Either way, I believe the Huck still has more delegates, and he has Chuck Norris. Me>>> There are a lot of races left in the Republican Party. A lot of ways to overtake the Huck, who the GOP is sick of. Opponent>>> Wait, so if you quit too early, you're a quitter, if you stay in until you're mathematically eliminated, then you stayed too long and you're selfish, but if you stay in long after the majority of the delegates have voted for other candidates, you win? Me>>> No. That's not what I said. All things should be in moderation. Romney quit WAY too early back in February. Huckabee quit way too late. Opponent>>> Giuliani has a lot of votes. Me>>> HA! Who is stupid enough to choose a political candidate who can't play politics well? Would you choose a baby to be on your football team? If they can't play, don't pick them. And you keep making the same arguments. Come up with something better. Opponent>>> Um, no. Thompson was never a formidable opponent against anyone. I do believe, though, that he would still win over Paul just through name recognition. Me>>> You conceed that Thompson is not even a factor. But Paul will beat him in a race between the two because they've decided on a moderate Republican. Opponent>>> Well, if the Libertarian party has so many "resources" then why didn't Ron run as a registered Libertarian? Me>>> The Republican Party has more resources than the LP. The LP has little resources compared to the GOP, but if they build their resources. Two sources telling you the same thing: VOTE PAUL!!! will ultimately decide the better choice in the vast majority of voter's minds. And both their resources combined, the second and third biggest parties will sweep the nation!!! Opponent>>> The thing is that Ron Paul isn't really that moderate; he and his supporters are very radical. In fact, the only reason he still has any support is because many conservatives are afraid to go with a moderate like McCain. Me>>> This is a ridiculous statement! Paul is a Libertarian first. He believes in liberal social issues. Show me some proof showing Paul not being a moderate and PLEASE some proof of his supporters making assumptions. If you want to win this debate, stop making assumptions and tell the truth. Opponent>>> If he can't even drum up support among people that supposedly share most of his beliefs, how is he ever going to "transcend party lines"? Me>>> NC is one of the worst states for Paul! What views do they share? Opponent>>> Anyway, to win this argument you have to actually explain how he will BEAT the democratic nominee as well. Me>>> Paul is a fiscal conservative in a recession with Democratic influences culturally while supporting many smart economic plans. III. McCain's Inevitable Felony Politicians commit crimes on the time. Whether political or not. McCain has committed a crime and WILL commit another. A. The first crime will be an affair that was commited to a lobbyist. There is strict evidence for this as I will present. http://www.huffingtonpost.com... First, the day the affair broke, McCain was avoiding reporters, which is uncharacteristic. A story has broken about McCain not voting for Bush, which is ridiculous considering his extensive campaign work for Bush. He chuckles when asked questions about it. He avoids no questions about it. Secondly, he lied about the true story. One day in September of 2002 he admitted that the lobbyist called him about the FCC but in 2008 he said the exact opposite that he never spoke to Paxton about the FCC. Thirdly, the paper that broke the story says that they have all the facts and stood by it. Fourthly, in his 2000 campaign, his staff is on record telling him to distance himself from her during the campaign. If nothing was going on between them why would the campaign be so worried? It is evident that the affair is true. B. He has a raging temper. http://www.washingtonpost.com... McCain has been on record as having a raging temper. He even conceeded it in his book. He said 'My temper shows when people insult my dignity and honor.' This is bound to happen in a general election. He is also on record as holding grudges. He can let his temper loose at anytime on any person. C. John McCain will be charged with a felony before November 7th!!! IV. Paul will win - Ron Paul has the support of two parties! - His other opponents are unformiddable as I explained in section II. - McCain will loose the nomination soon, inevitably. - Paul is a conservative on fiscal matters when the recession is the number 1 issue. Why would America vote for somebody who is the #16 most liberal senator and does not have sensible economic plans compared to Paul's? America has outlined their number 1 concern: the recession. Please vote for the better debater