Evolution is a Truth

If you take nothing else away from this debate, let it be this: Citing your sources, clarifying key words in your thesis statement, proof reading, and not contradicting yourself are essentials for debating. This is the first time you've used any kind of citation, and it is the last round. You should be ashamed. And please stop taking your anger out on me, when you are really just frustrated at yourself. Stop making lame excuses like, 'oh you shouldn't attack my improper language use', and just make sure you use things correctly going forward. Now...to refute you. "Maybe use common sense before blindly debating what you perceive is wrong. Truth at the most basic definition, which would allow you to deduce the statement quickly, was used to show how evolution is an actual state that is concurrent with modern day and is in our ecosystem and was involved with life on Earth." Listen, I already said that I am not an opponent of Evolution, I was an opponent of what you said in your opening statement. What you said in your opening statement made you look stupid, and this statement also makes me think you are in NO WAY someone to go to for an explanation on what Evolution is, is not, and the details therein. Maybe use precise language and proof-read and people won't be confused? But hey, color me crazy, I guess I am asking a lot there. Seriously dude, you completely contradict yourself in R2, it cannot be interpreted differently. "...you seem to enjoy bringing up my incompetence in the field of this, which is completely hypocritical and maybe if you were confused, you should given definitions rather than just saying I'm wrong." I did give definitions, and sources, and asked multiple times for definitions from you that weren't just made up on the spot. It took you four rounds to do that. And yes, I enjoy brining up your incompetence, it was the whole basis of my argument. Thank you for realizing that and confirming that you are incompetent. "To further nail down what I was saying and get this thought to you: I said NO FURTHER EXPLANATION because we have enough evidence to prove evolution happened, its done, its real and its in our world today." Oh really? Then why did you even start this debate? Inherently, you just defeated your own thesis statement. If Evolution requires NO FURTHER EXPLANATION because, as you say, it is true, proven, and "in our world today" (whatever the hell that means...was Evolution not in our world a 1000 years ago?), but you were looking for someone to debate with and thus PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION. Because there are many people who disagree not only on Evolution as a valid scientific concept, but on the finer details therein! THUS REQUIRING MORE EXPLANATION Furthermore, science is not the end all be all for verifying truths in this world. Science can tell you what the chemical properties of ink and paper are, but science cannot tell you the true meaning of a beautiful novel. Science can tell you the composition and objective provable facts of the paintings in the Sistine Chapel, but science cannot even begin to answer why people all over the world find it so breath takingly beautiful. Science needs to work with other disciplines and other skills to reach people and be effective. So, again, just take your time and actually think about what you are saying. And ask yourself, "Am I an expert on Evolution? Or am I believing the words of a bunch of people I never met regarding and intensely complicated subject that I really know little about outside of what others tell me?"