Covenys recent behavior would be a net detriment on ForDebating.Com (his new website)

4k characters?!?! Mikal has a problem with my behavior, and the behavior he has a problem with, is me having a problem with Tuf’s behavior. Keep in mind that whatever applies to Tuf’s (moderator - DDO) behavior also apply to mine (owner - ForDebating.com). He needs to prove: 1) Loss 2) I’m wrong 3) Detriment #1 What do I have to lose? Mail list = 3 - http://eepurl.com... YouTube = 6 - https://tinyurl.com... Fackbook = 35 (mostly friends) - facebook.com/fordebating https://imgur.com... A micro influencer starts at 10k - https://tinyurl.com... 44 unique people is not even 1% of MICRO. Good luck proving I have anything to lose… #2 My behavior is “bad”. The facts: 2A) I focused on Tuf 2B) Per Tuf “I lied and manipulated you in a game about lying and manipulation?” “Because it is a working technique.” 2C) I’m against lying, manipulation, and trolling 2D) Tuf is a moderator for DDO 2E) I am not this site's owner 2E) Tuf continued after the game (Troll) What's bad? Me not liking that Tuf lies, manipulates, and trolls as a moderator who should be building the community? I’ll take that side of a fight any day. You might not like the way I came across, or my tone of voice, or the way I said it, or whatever BS subjective wrapping you prefer to feel warm and fuzzy about the message, but in the end of it, I’m on the good/right side of this fight. If Pro feels otherwise I suggest he explains why lying, manipulating, and trolling are “good” behavior. #3 Controversial behavior helps rather than hurts 3A) Good guys finish last https://imgur.com... 7 THOUSAND people saw this ad... 6 people engaged. Ya that didn’t work, but hey it was polite. 3B) bad press “There is no such thing as bad publicity” R13; Brendan Behan “The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.” – Oscar Wilde “a savvy marketing ploy”- https://tinyurl.com... Borat’s “bad press” = 300% increase in engagement - https://tinyurl.com... Criticized books = + a third sales - https://tinyurl.com...; 3B) Mikal https://imgur.com... Ya that didn’t work, but hey it was polite. Mikal ignored me, but now engages to spread the FD work, proving that my technique… how did Tuf put it? “is a working technique.” 3C) Controversy business model Since 1986 - Howard Stern - https://tinyurl.com... 90m - https://tinyurl.com... 26+ seasons– Jerry Springer -https://tinyurl.com... 4.5m - https://tinyurl.com... Since 1996 - Alex Jones - https://tinyurl.com... 10+m - https://tinyurl.com... Outrageous is both lucrative AND effective. 3D) Fights “Reality” TV shows - https://tinyurl.com... “better advertising ... than any ... ad would ever be.” https://tinyurl.com... 3E) Trump I don't like Don the con but you can’t disagree with the effectiveness of his bad publicity, for his own good: “Trump’s most guiding, ... beliefs, ... that bad publicity … should be embraced” - https://tinyurl.com... Free media = $5 billion “The PR adage of “any news is good news” appeared to be the case in Donald Trump coverage.” https://tinyurl.com... Repeat … bad publicity got Trump 5b in free publicity I'd do nice and polite, but as my opponent is a prime example of, that doesn't work. His “positive vibe” didn’t get him off his a$$, a fight did. Don’t get me wrong, I, like you, ignore most advertising. You may not like my methods, hell I don’t like my methods, but these are the ones that work. Want me to advertise differently? PLEASE present me with a better option, and not some naive fantasy of what advertising “should” be, but methods that have been tested and proven. As I’ve shown, (and let’s be fair you already know this to be true) shock jocks, fights, and outrageousness break through the walls that we have all created against the constant onslaught of advertising. The Alex Jones’s of the world, and their prince Trump have shown what system works, and that’s what I’m using.