Bernie Sanders as President

Several corrections first off: "My opponent Con" - I'm Pro "has continued throughout this debate excusing my claims over his opening argument of being simply speech material from Bernie Sanders, by dismissing merely as playing semantic games (which, ironically, you aren't using the term appropriately)" I am using the word appropriately and here"s why: instead of focusing on my arguments, which are crystal clear by the nature of their heading, not once has Con bothered to address them but merely dodged and ignored by attempting to shift the debate away from why Bernie Sanders is most qualified to be President to what constitutes an argument and what doesn"t, which I also addressed in Round 3, "Bernie Sanders understand the problems currently facing the United States of America and the solutions necessary to fix those problems. I provided both the problems, persuasively, supported by evidence, and the solutions, persuasively, supported by evidence. That is the definition of argumentation." As well as in Round 4, "It should go without saying, as the majority would agree, that the standard for President is the following: the individual who has a clear understanding of the problems facing a country and holds a clear vision as to how to solve those problems ought to be the leader of that country. Bernie Sanders, according to my argumentation, is the most qualified individual to be President of the United States because he meets those standards." "Your citations that you use either cite what Bernie said," Yet again, Con has not bothered to examine any of these citations. Not a single citation directs to Bernie Sanders transcripts. They direct to evidence which supports the claims Bernie is making in the quotes provided. Patently false statement by Con. "or the situations on the "corrupt society/economy of America" through leftist media sites such as Alternet, Common Dreams etc. Which, keeping in mind, are not even relevant to this debate. How is the use of superdelegates, however undemocratic, important to why Bernie Sanders would make a good president?" The heading of the argument is "ARGUMENT 1: THE PROBLEM - THE ESTABLISHMENT OLIGARCHY: THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED TO FAVOR THE TOP 1%" The quote I provided from the CNN article, "In other words, the Democratic Party's superdelegates exist to preserve the power and influence of the Democratic Party's elite" is wholly relevant to the argument being made. "First, that his policies were to unrealistic and optimistic, and that he would in actuality, achieve little." This was addressed by my second argument which Con ignored completely. So this does not hold. " I have outlined the serious implications of his proposed single payer healthcare system as a main example of this point, the futility of the taxes and the price we would actually pay, whether through even more taxes or wait times or lack of proper medical equipment. All throughout this time using numbers from unbiased sources," The sources were most definitely not unbiased. In additional to that, I showed why the analysis by the economist Con cited is wrong on numerous counts in Round 3. I applaud my opponent for having the courage to debate this topic although I encourage him to do more research for future debates.