"Assault Rifles" (AR-15's Legality)

I'm seriously reconsidering what I said about knowing what you're talking about, I provided sources for pretty much every word I typed and you just deny that. You say that one of the people I linked you to is biased, and you won't trust him, even though he provdied factual evidence to support his claims, as did I. You counter my arguement by saying "can you prove this?" When rebutting me, at least stick to using your side of the case to counter arguements, not just asking if I can prove my claims, even though I've provided sources that back my claims quite effectively. Now, onto your arguement. Firstly, you clearly have a fundamental misunderstanding of gun laws. Chicago has strict gun laws, and that means you can't bring guns into the city that don't fit the requirements. It doesn't mean you can just buy a gun somewhere else and bring it back. Your statistic just proves that people will bring guns that don't fit the laws into areas with strict control and commit crime with them anyways. The guns that were siezed by the police were not from law-abiding citizens, they were from illegal gun smugglers. I do not see the point of your statistic, as it rebuts itself. http://www.nytimes.com... The constitution was written for the people, it wasn't written for the states, it wasn't written for militias. It was written so that we as a people had a clear understanding of what rights the government cannot take away from us, and what our country stood for. The rebuttal you have provided to my point is complete nonsense. I actually did provide a source at the bottom of my previous arguement, proving that you did not even check my sources. Look at my sources and then rebut that Point please. As I said earlier, just because M.r Crowder is biased doesn't mean the facts he provides are false. The rebuttal you provided countered my point in saying it wasn't all that effective, but you completely disregarded the point of that whole section of writing, which was that the technology existed, so the founding fathers most definetly knew that there was more than one shot rifles being developed. They were not fools, they could see that there was advancements being made in technology. Hell, president Madison protected a citizen ships right to have cannons on it, in a time when cannons served almost purely military purposes. "Just because I can bear a knife instead of a gun, doesn't mean I shouldn't have to." - Why? Can you back this assertion up? You got a laugh out of me with that one. You're asking for me to prove the second amendment exists. The only people who can put out a maximum rate of fire accurately are militarily trained and proficient shooters. A civilian cannot grab a gun and ,without training, put out a maximum ROF with accuracy. I love how you asked me for a source on that point, and then told me something that actually needs backing (i.e. That is why we have so many shootings. Because guns are easily accessed, and you can easily use them) Don't ask me to prove common sense. I can't play football well just because I have a pigskin, but claiming that easily accessed weapons lead to more shootings is something that needs to be backed with statistics. As for your rebuttal to my main point, rates per 100,000 are, like you said, rates. They aren't going to be equal for countries with 10% of the population of us. Had you watched the Crowder video, or actually looked at my sources, you would have understood that. Now onto your added fuel, which I will provide sources for, becuase the rest of this arguement already was sourced, you just ignored them because the provider of the facts was biased, which is the point. I wouldn't be on their side if I disagreed with them, and I'm obviously going to be biased towards my side, as are you. "Guns cause more suicide" is complete nonsense. Guns don't cause suicide. Guns don't bully you. Guns don't push you over a mental line. Guns are an effective tool in ending your life, but so are cars, toasters, prescription drugs, knives, blunt weapons, hands, water, all things we have rights to. Maybe instead of gun control we need a means of not letting people get to the point of wanting to end their lives, because if they want to kill themselves, they don't need guns. https://www.thetrace.org... That says that keeping a gun safely stored decreases suicide rate, so like i Said, keep your guns safe, and you'll save lives. "More guns cause more accidental deaths" that's not guns, that's a lack of common sense, and lack of thought of the safety of others. A gun has a safety, we have trigger locks, we have gun safes. It's when stupid people do stupid things with guns that gets people killed, not just having a gun. It's having a gun, and not knowing how to be safe with it. Stupid things like "don't give your kid a gun" and "put your guns in a safe" and "never point the gun at yourself or others." Because those things are things you are told at gun safety training courses, it's when idiots don't follow those rules that causes accidental deaths, not guns. http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com... http://www.cnsnews.com... https://www.aei.org... http://americangunfacts.com... http://ijr.com... These sources pertain to both parts of this portion of the rebuttal. While you are more likely to be shot in the occurrance of a shooting,you are also far less likely to be involved in a shooting or violent crime if you carry. A study found that you are far likely to be engaged by someone with criminal intent if you have a firearm on you. https://www.gunowners.org... The people are far more effective than the police, actually. The police error rate is 11% while it's 2% with citizens in self defense. And no, I don't think all gun laws are bad. I fully support project exile, which is a gun law that liberals hate. Basically if you are caught with a gun illegally, you get a much more severe sentence, and has proven to be effective in the several states it was employed in. https://en.m.wikipedia.org... We don't need to take away guns for law abiding citizens, we need to make sure those citizens can protect themselves, and make the punishment worse for people who use firearms incorrectly.