The Biblical Adam and Eve were real people

Allow me to apologize that I forgot to mention a source in my rebuttal and here it is. https://bible.org... Again I want to thank Con for his rebuttal, and again I find common fundamental mistakes and errors in his logic, not only that I have evidence that he is dishonest. But let me touch bases on the second have of his opening argument then I will touch bases on his rebuttal. As we can clearly see when I debunked his incest argument that he failed to touch bases on in his rebuttal so I think that he concedes that argument and to add to the fallacy of such arguments even from an evolutionary perspective if we all descended from the same family tree, incest has to take place for the world to populate as we see today. Consider this statement from Bible.org: But here is another issue to consider. If one accepts the evolutionary hypothesis as to the origin of the human race, has that really relieved the issue of incest? Not unless you also propound the idea of the evolution of many pairs of beings, pre-human or whatever, at the same time. No matter what theory of the origin of the human race one may take, are we not driven to the conclusion that in the early history of the race, there was the need for intermarriage of the children of the same pair? https://bible.org... My opponent stated: Let us move on to the moral problems caused by this incestual issue. In the Book of Leviticus, supposedly written by Moses, who according to Judeo-Christian tradition received direct inspiration from the Holy Spirit, we see laws specifically prohibiting incest of any kind. In the eighteenth chapter, sexual relations with one's siblings, parents, and other relatives are all strictly forbidden [9]. Keeping this in mind, let us examine Genesis 4:17, reading "Cain made love to his wife, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Enoch." Many scholars are baffled by this passage because there is no previous mention of Cain having a wife. Because Eve is "mother of all the living", God cannot have created a wife for Cain, so we are left with two options: 1. Cain married his sister, or more disturbingly, 2. Cain married Eve herself. Both of these options are vile sins according to the Laws of Moses. This is a common error made by Biblical critics, they cherry pic scriptures, try to connect them together and come to a conclusion that God made a mistake, he is not to be trusted. Not comprehending that scriptures verifies scriptures, that if one finds a inconsistency in one part, the answer could be in another part. For example, He takes the incest of Adam and Eve and the first generation of the human race populating the world with the law of Moses in Leviticus & come to a conclusion that God is contradicting himself. But Con failed to factor in, Romans 5:12-14 King James Version (KJV) 12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: 13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come. As we can clearly see sin is not inputed when there is no law, and there was no law from Adam to Moses, so for Con to say things like, "God cannot have created a wife for Cain, so we are left with two options: 1. Cain married his sister, or more disturbingly, 2. Cain married Eve herself. Both of these options are vile sins according to the Laws of Moses." Only tells me the only thing thats vile in this fallacy is Con's gross misinterpretation of the scriptures as we can clearly see errors in his logic, research, and understanding. Allow me to touch bases on Con's rebuttal when he stated, " I will return briefly to the idea of genetic variation. If everyone on the planet is descended from only two individuals, how did different races come about? If Genesis is to be believed, every single human being on the Earth would contain only mixtures of Adam and Eve's DNA, but we are so diverse that the very idea is impossible. There goes that impossible word again, when their is a very logical explanation and concrete evidence to prove it is not impossible because every human being on earth have Melanin and Melanocyte. Melanin is a broad term for a group of natural pigments found in most organisms (arachnids are one of the few groups in which it has not been detected). Melanin is produced by the oxidation of the amino acid tyrosine, followed by polymerization. The pigment is produced in a specialized group of ligaments and tissues known as melanocytes. There are three basic types of melanin: eumelanin, pheomelanin, and neuromelanin. The most common is eumelanin, of which there are two types"brown eumelanin and black eumelanin. Pheomelanin is a cysteine-containing red polymer of benzothiazine units largely responsible for red hair, among other pigmentation. Neuromelanin is found in the brain, though its function remains obscure. In the skin, melanogenesis occurs after exposure to UV radiation, causing the skin to visibly tan. Melanin is an effective absorber of light; the pigment is able to dissipate over 99.9% of absorbed UV radiation.[1] Because of this property, melanin is thought to protect skin cells from UVB radiation damage, reducing the risk of cancer. Furthermore, though exposure to UV radiation is associated with increased risk of malignant melanoma, a cancer of the melanocytes, studies have shown a lower incidence for skin cancer in individuals with more concentrated melanin, i.e. darker skin tone.https://en.wikipedia.org... Now lets look at Melanocyte are melanin-producing cells located in the bottom layer (the stratum basale) of the skin's epidermis, the middle layer of the eye (the uvea),[3] the inner ear,[4] meninges,[5] bones,[6] and heart.[7] Melanin is the pigment primarily responsible for skin color. Once synthesised, melanin is contained in a special organelle called a melanosome and moved along arm-like structures called dendrites, so as to reach the keratinocytes.https://en.wikipedia.org... Through a process called melanogenesis, these cells produce melanin, which is a pigment found in the skin, eyes, and hair. This melanogenesis leads to a long-lasting pigmentation, which is in contrast to the pigmentation that originates from oxidation of already-existing melanin. The difference in skin color between lightly and darkly pigmented individuals is due not to the number (quantity) of melanocytes in their skin, but to the melanocytes' level of activity (quantity and relative amounts of eumelanin and pheomelanin). This process is under hormonal control, including the MSH and ACTH peptides that are produced from the precursor proopiomelanocortin. People with oculocutaneous albinism typically have a very low level of melanin production. https://en.wikipedia.org... So what were dealing with here as the human race populated the world, we had to migrate to different parts of the world, its not hard to conclude that the people and the generations after them who were exposed to more UV radiation would produce a different skin pigmentation and color tone than those who migrated to parts of the world where less UV radiation was exposed to them. This is concrete evidence that proves it had nothing to do wit the Tower of Babel. So for Con to assume its impossible to have different races according to the Genesis creation narrative is a false dichotomy based on subjective and faulty reasoning. I would encourage Con who have done some research but with a skeptical mind to renounce his personal biases which leads to one-sided research that would be exposed by the evidence. Time is up!