White Privilege Exists

In the comments [arc], Con states: "you keep trying to debate truisms[.] ... You are a coward, and it really is not going to work here. ... Way to debate a truism. Also way to only noob snipe. I bet you crapped your pants when I accepted this".I accept Con's definition of privilege in hopes that Con will stop whining.I'll rebut Con's case, extend my own, and provide conclusions.REBUTTALSAfter complaining about my use of "some random series of words that popped into his head", Con attempts to rebut my 10 studies with one citation and a whole lotta "words that popped into his head". Let's address the study.Reverse Wage GapCon's study argues that black college-educated women make more than white college-educated women. The study doesn't address Hispanics.First: In the US, 37% are nonwhite. 13% are black. About 1/3, or 4.3%, are blacks with college degrees. About 1/2, or 2.1%, are black women with degrees. Black women are <6% of US nonwhites. At best, Con disproves white privilege for 1 in 20 nonwhites. Hardly a rebuttal.Second: Con's study controls for education (p10). In short, it compares blacks and whites with equal education. Yet blacks are less able to pursue education. Con's own study explains (p5):"For black men born in the South and those born outside the South but born to poorly educated parents, the wage gap is related to the lower quality education they receive. O’Neill and O’Neill (2005) conclude that differences in the quantity of education and the quality of skills account for most of the wage gap between white and black men and women. .... Blacks are likely to have a lower supply for education and therefore in order to make the investment worthwhile, those who choose to attend post-secondary schooling are of higher average ability. Consequently, blacks who attend college may be of higher average ability than whites who attend post-secondary schooling."In short: blacks have less education opportunities & worse education. Those who survive the broken system are stronger candidates. But the ones left behind aren't so lucky.Thanks for the evidence, Con!Life ChoicesCon states: "If blacks ... value education less than whites ... obviously they will be paid less[.]"Con provides no evidence that blacks value education less OR that this causes worse black education attainment rates. Instead, Con's own study and my evidence [NCES][HR][Atlantic] strongly suggest that black people are incapable of pursuing education because they live in worse neighborhoods with worse schools and have less access to the expensive college route.Con states: "The only evidence he uses ... is the income gap, which is already explained by life choices that black Americans make. .... If their life strategy is to enjoy life ... by spending all their money ... that is there [sic] decision and not because anyone is racist or white privileged."Again, Con provides no evidence that black "life choices" are the cause of income/wealth disparities. My evidence shows that -- over and above educational challenges -- blacks are biased against when pursuing a job [SP], which prevents them from advancing their own income.Moreover, income disparities have persisted since 1967 [see graph]. Con's argument only works if blacks made the same "life choices" under literal segregation as today. This is absurd.EXTENSIONCon fails altogether to rebut crucial portions of my case.* Con fails to rebut [Atlantic], which shows that black families making $100,000 live where white families making $30,000 live (due to racist federal policies) and so have poorer schools & communities.* Con fails to rebut [NCES] and [HR], which show that nonwhites face higher high school dropout & lower college success rates. Con's own study supports my claim that blacks have less access to education!* Con fails to rebut [SP], which shows that for identical black & white college-graduate resumes sent to the same employers, blacks had the same success rate as white criminals.* Con fails to rebut [Conf] and [UMich], which show there's more anti-black racism & that that racism literally kills blacks through disease burden and health administrator bias.In short: I have provided 4 areas (housing, employment, education, health) where nonwhites of equal status with whites are biased against:* Rich blacks live in poor neighborhoods with poor schools.* Whites have easier & longer education.* Among identical resumes, the preferred candidate is white.* Blacks die younger because of racism.Under Con's own definition of privilege, I still win.Reminder: I can't rebut Pro's Round 3 speech. Judge, don't let Pro raise new arguments against points they chose not to answer before.CONCLUSIONSCon's study supports my case.Con's case lacks evidence.Con failed to rebut my evidence.My evidence shows nonwhites face worse housing, worse education, worse employment, and worse health -- just for being nonwhite. Thank you.REFERENCES[arc] archive.is/QiCDT