rezzealaux and The_Devils_Advocate are the same people

I affirm, that "[R]ezzealaux and The_Devils_Advocate are the same people". (I like to capitalize the R, thanks.) Definitions here should be pretty self-explanatory. The one thing that does need to be cleared up, however, are the last few words: "the same people". Now this could mean that we're from the same culture, or from the same country, or from the same ethnicity, but going through R1 and his terminology used, the only logical conclusion we can reach is that the resolution really meant to say "[R]ezzealaux and The_Devils_Advocate are the same people." Please note that even though my opponent is CON, he is the one that is putting forth this statement as true (that the resolution is false). If at any point in time you feel that he has not met the burden of proof placed upon him by his claim, you automatically go PRO because my responsibility is only to show that CON is incorrect. NOTE BEFORE THE LINE BY LINE: I am aware that I have dissociative identity disorder (more commonly known as multiple personality disorder). I black out sometimes, and others it seems like I'm just watching myself on autopilot, doing things I don't agree with. However, I do know that I am "the original" or "the archetype", so to speak, for every other identity that is currently residing with me. As such, The_Devils_Advocate is most likely one of the separatist identities that live within the body that I generally retain command over: the way he spelled rezzealaux - without the capitalized R - shows that he dislikes my administration. Still, I shall refer to TDA as "he", as referring to both of us using "I" and "me" would be confusing for everyone reading. "I submit that rezzealaux is not the same person as I am." > Although we are different personalities, we still share the same body and therefore are the "same people", or rather, the same person. "I posit this because if rezzealaux was myself, then he would not challenge himself on this topic." > He obviously doesn't know his tendencies very well. I like putting myself up to the test of interesting and mind-boggling resolutions such as this one, and my debate history shows that I've done this in the past as well (Example 1: http://www.debate.org..., example 2: http://www.debate.org...). Since I am the archetype and he's something that branched off me, his tendencies should also be similar – hence, this debate. His point contradicts the known evidence, so it cannot be upheld as true. > I am not claiming at I am him. Indeed, I have already stated that we are different identities. What I am claiming that Rezzealaux and The_Devils_Advocate are the same person in real life – which is, the resolution. "Not only that, but if by challenging himself on this topic, it could reveal himself to be himself. If rezzealaux has two different accounts, then he would not want others to know this and therefore wouldn't challenge himself." > How does the revelation happen, exactly? > And even if it did happen, why would I be afraid about revealing us? I've done it already. > Why would I care if others knew or not? My attitude on this site has already shown that I care a lot more about what I think about myself than what others think of me (I ridicule people a lot if they deserve it; just look around the new debates section for a few minutes and you'll see me doing it), so why would it matter if other people knew about us if it meant that I got a mental orgasm in the process? I look forward to the separatist's response.