Whether or not the prophecies in the bible can be used as evidence for the existence of god

Here are the two main argument which my opponent makes, everything I have written below these two arguments are small details, furthermore I argue that my opponent hasn't visited the link I gave him: . http://therefinersfire.org... To prove this I will only use arguments that can come from a website I've just given. 1. The Prophecies Came to Pass logically Here he argues that because of the Christian leaders this prophecy came to pass quite naturally. I argue that when this prophecy was written there was nothing logical, normal or probable about it. As one can see here: . http://therefinersfire.org... Furthermore I don't see an alternative to a logical fulfillment with the exception of an extravagant miracle (which was probably what the prophet imagined would happen). An extravagant miracle can be anything from all Jews teleporting to Israel to something involving flying unicorn with its tail on fire ! !! 2. Prophecies are timeless. Here my opponent argues that the Bible prophecies are timeless however thats not true as you can see here: . http://therefinersfire.org... Some of these prophecies are very precise and must be fulfilled in a certain amount of time. Some of these prophecies must be fulfilled in the right order. The theme of me regretting for not building a cumulative case is very vivid in this debate but I realize that I don't need to have this to win. Furthermore its obvious that my opponent hasn't even visited the lousy website I presented which funnily enough contains enough information for me to win this debate. The website that won this debate: . http://therefinersfire.org... Because of Cons obvious narrow mind (Didn't visit my website) I urge a Pro vote. Vote Pro Below are some other points refuted but this debate hangs on whatever the previous two points are valid. Time: "I willingly admit that he had no idea how it would happen or that he could even fathom that it was possible for it to happen the way it did. " No one would make a prediction unless one sees at least a small possibility. " the first segment of Pro's argument is nullified" No because you never addressed the most important parts of this fact. "I was merely offering a logical explanation based on what is known" While ignoring the Bible and God as a possibility consideration. " I have not denied the power of prophecy" One can't predict things the Bible predicted without God though it could be a one big coincidence. However that would be an irrational conclusion. Edgar Cayce: If we reject the deserved criticism: . http://www.intuitive-connections.net... I still argue that the return of the Jews is still less likely considering the place and time the prophet was when he predicted this. " There is no evidence that these prophecies came directly from god" If this is untrue then the prophets lied and if the prophets lied, there is no reason to believe the prophets which would make the prophecies untrue. However the prophecies have been fulfilled hence it cam from God. Modern Prophets: Because of the amount of rounds I have been given, Ill debate under the assumption that these modern prophets never made a mistake nor is there any correct criticism. How does that make the Bible prophecies, likely or even possible when predicted ? Again I feel sorry for not building a cumulative case but your notion even with my one prophecy is ridiculous. The final Paragraph: "With this information you see that the nations with Christian leaders set it in motion" You have ignored the many reasons why this prophecy is unlikely even with the Christian leaders which I have given in the previous round. " It is up to my opponent to dispute these facts " I laugh at that, you're the one who provided a bias view of these modern prophets. I thank you for reading this despite it not being necessary :).