Twin tower was demolished

Who and how and Why the did it is a topic that could last several years on a debate forum, that is why I wanted to have a debate about just the technical collapse of the building itself. But oh well lets do a little conspiracy theorizing. I can only theorize about who or how or why .The towers were demolished top down to make it look like it had been destroyed by a result of the plane hitting the tower, if they put the explosives in the lower part of the building it would look like a controlled demolition. Therefore it was very smart of them to make it a top down controlled demolition. This requires extreme technical capabilities far greater than any terrorists could have planned. So we can rule out terrorists.There is no precedent for a top down demolision that is true.There is also no precedent for a high rise skycraper to collapse due to fire yet on 911 it happened 3 times on the same day and never before or again and there have been worse fires in skyscrapers like the chinese meridian hotel. Why did they make building 7 look like a controlled demolition ? good question but they didnt and still dont show the collapse of that building on mainstream TV. The power of the mainstream media is such that you can cover up the collapse of one of the worst high rise buildings to collapse and even today less than half of new york citizens know it happened, I have talked to engineers who hadnt heard of it yet its the worst and only collapse of a skyscraper due to fire lol apart from the twin towers of course.Andreas Von BuelowHe served as secretary of state in the German Federal Ministry of Defence (1976-1980) and Minister for Research and Technology (1980-1982) . Not qualified enough? Lufthansa removed the ability of remote hijacking from their planes according to Von buelow.In the mid-seventies America faced a new and escalating crisis, with US commercial jets being hijacked for geopolitical purposes. Determined to gain the upper hand in this new form of aerial warfare, two American multinationals collaborated with the Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft. Brilliant both in concept and operation, “Home Run” [not its real code name] allowed specialist ground controllers to listen in to cockpit conversations on the target aircraft, then take absolute control of its computerized flight control system by remote means. From that point onwards, regardless of the wishes of the hijackers or flight deck crew, the hijacked aircraft could be recovered and landed automatically at an airport of choice, with no more difficulty than flying a radio-controlled model plane. The engineers had no idea that almost thirty years after its initial design, Home Run’s top secret computer codes would be broken, and the system used to facilitate direct ground control of the four aircraft used in the high-profile attacks on New York and Washington on 11th September 2001.Former German Minister Von Buelow Already Knew About Remote Control In his interview with the German daily "Tagesspiegel" on January 13th, former German Secretary of Defence Andreas Von Buelow made the following statement:- "There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: according to this, the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the pilots' hands, from outside. The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system]. This theory says, this technique was abused in this case..." Not quite so much a theory as might first appear. When I released the above report about "Home Run" remote control in October 2001, I mentioned that one European flag carrier was aware of the technology, though at that precise point in time I thought it prudent not to name the actual airline:- "As long ago as the early nineties, a major European flag carrier acquired the information and was seriously alarmed that one of its own aircraft might be "rescued" by the Americans without its authority. Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet..." The European flag carrier which completely stripped the American flight computers out of its aircraft was Lufthansa, the German national airline. Bearing in mind his former posts as Secretary of Defence and Minister of Science and Technology, Herr Von Buelow would have known all about this mammoth but secretive task. How very clever (and discreet) of Von Buelow to sort of "drop the information" into the middle of an interview about the 9/11 attacks!The technology existed for some time and therefore its not far fetched or unlikely. Especially considering that the terrorists could barely fly a Cesna and no profesional pilots themselves cannot replicate what the terrorists did in a flight simulator.http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org...The claim is not that some of the alleged hijackers were still alive, but rather that men with the same identities were reported alive after 9/11. Furthermore, while it is true that some of the "alive" stories were simply cases of mistaken identity, there are also instances where this is not the case.http://pilotsfor911truth.org...Building 7 was demolished for the reason the securites fraud documents were kept there it was kept secret. If it was a cover up and such a bad one then why did they get away with it, it doesnt matter what they do the american publich will believe what they want to believe , its very obvious. The dust and debris was ejected horizontally and did not stack up that is why at the bottom of the towers there wasnt stacks or debris of 90,000 tonnes of concrete , where did it go remember those big dust clouds .Com'No one expected airplanes to fly into the towers. There is very little precedent of airplanes flying into buildings, certainly not with large fuel-filled planes such as the Boeing 767. I would not be sure what to expect. Do you have any calculations that show you what must happen when a large airplane flies into a large building? 'Irrelevant as a plane crashing into a building will not cause the undamaged areas to self implode however the towers were specifically designed to withstand multiple jet airliners crashing into them. http://www.youtube.com...On 911 there were drills in which terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the wtc, when i heard that I knew that it was an inside job regardless of the other evidence. So people were expecting that possibility.http://www.youtube.com...; Do I have calculations for a jet hitting a building? no,the engineers who built it do apparently but asymetrical damage due to a plane impact would cause the top of the building to topple over towards the damaged are it would not collapse symetrically .Who ? I can only theorize but investigative research has been done and cant be explained in this topic , I therefore recommend you read the book or watch the video . Some call them the 'global mafia' corporate criminal elements which have subverted our democracy. http://www.youtube.com...WHY? Many reasons , one being the iraq afghanistan war the other the securities were to expire on sep 12th also the 2.3trillion dollars of black operations covered up in the pentagon strike. Why saudis? because Saudi Intelligence works with Mossad and the cia ,Bush and prince Bandar, and the bin laden family http://www.presstv.ir...