Information science demonstrates that biological information requires an intelligent mind (i.e. God)

While there is indeed little definitive evidence as to formation of life, there is equally as little evidence of life being created by any central deity. Disproving one theory doesn’t necessary make another one any more valid. With that said however, your claim that abiogenesis has no scientific merit is false as I would like to show you in the following arguments. Your argument that states that a central deity was necessary for formation of life is flawed, while it is true that all molecules move toward entropy, this is only true of spontaneous reactions, meaning reactions which don’t require any energy. These reactions don’t require any energy because of the second law of thermodynamics, which Dr. Gitt’s explanation definitely agrees with and so do I. This information cannot be used to disprove a scientific formation of life however since it ignores the idea that a molecule may go against entropy with application of energy. I would like to direct your attention to the Miller-Urey experiment, which was able to create many of the amino acids that form life by applying electric energy (which could have been lightning as used in experiment or another form of energy) to an environment that was thought to be similar to one found on earth at the time life evolved. Running the experiment with higher concentrations of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfur dioxide (which is another likely composition of molecules found due to many volcanic eruptions) revealed even more amino acids being formed. These amino acids are the heart of life, they are required to create proteins without which life would not exist. These proteins have likely evolved from smaller proteins bonding together eventually being able to create first organisms able to synthesize RNA (which is found in all living organisms and contains the code for creation of amino acids) One could argue the composition of earth’s atmosphere when life was first created, but one may not dispute the fact that there are planets (including ones in our solar system) that have similar compositions of molecules, suggesting that even if composition on earth was unlikely to support formation of amino acids, the likelihood of these molecules coming from other planets is also likely. To go back to the Laws of Information, I agree with SLI 2, as for the other ones, let me address them one by one: SLI 1: “A material entity cannot generate a non-material entity” This is not true because we as humans generate non material entities on a daily basis, it is the ideas and thoughts that we generate. Ideas and thoughts satisfy the definition of universal information as it is created by an ‘intelligent sender’ defined as someone who is conscious, has a will of its own, is creative, thinks autonomously, and acts purposefully. Therefore we as humans, a material entity generate universal information, a non-material entity. SLI 3: “Universal information cannot be created by statistical processes” The arguments presented in the article for this one are false, as I have shown beforehand, there have been physical experiments to show how life might have evolved, not to mention several experiments to show evolution of organisms in action. SLI 4: “Universal information can only be produced by an intelligent sender” This law contradicts SLI 1, by the definition of an intelligent sender which humans fit, but humans as a material entity (have mass) cannot produce universal information by SLI 1. This therefore proves that a material entity can produce universal information disproving the ideas of a creator.