life being nature, there is no, before life

Pro is merely paraphrasing the resolution in different words, and, therefore, has not constructed a positive case. Pro must fulfill their BoP. Nonetheless, I shall construct a negative case. My negative case is based on this structure - P1. The universe was created 13.7 billion years ago (approx.) P2. The universe is the basis of nature. C1. Nature was formed 13.7 billion years ago. P3. Life was formed 3.6 billion years ago (approx). C2. Nature originated prior to life. C1) Nature was formed 13.7 billion years ago The Big Bang Theory (BBT) is the prevailing cosmological model for the universe from its earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale evolution. [1] There are multiple observational proofs that support the BBT scientifically. Notable amongst them is the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (CMB), thermal radiation left over from the Big Bang of cosmology. [2] This thermal radiation is seen as a faint background glow using a sensitive radio telescope in the space between celestial bodies. The glow is strongest in the microwave region of the radio spectrum. In the absence of Big Bang, there would be no reason to expect a uniform, long-wavelength background radiation in the universe. [3] This is a satellite picture of CMB radiation as negative space in the universe. The CMB glow and the rest of the universe seem to be approximately homogenous and isotropic; this is a prediction of the Big Bang. In 2014, a measure of the B-mode polarization CMB signal at 150 GHz was published in the POLARBEAR experiment. The B-mode polarization is proof of primordial gravitational waves, as predicted by Einstein in 1915. [4] These primordial gravitational waves contain thermal energy similar to the primordial energy of the baryon-plasma sea that was the universe approximately 13.5 billion years ago. [5] “The CMB is a snapshot of the oldest light in our Universe, imprinted on the sky when the Universe was just 380,000 years old. It shows tiny temperature fluctuations that correspond to regions of slightly different densities, representing the seeds of all future structure: the stars and galaxies of today.” [6] This graph shows the temperature fluctuations of the CMB detected over different angular scales on the sky, offering further proof of the temperature detection of the CMB. That the CMB is of cosmological origins acts as a scientific consensus. [7] Another indicator for the Big Bang is the organization of the known universe with galactic evolution. “Galaxies are also dynamic entities, changing over time. Like with large scale structure, the broad strokes of galaxy formation follow a path of ‘hierarchical clustering’: small structures form very early on and these merge to form larger structures as time goes on. Within this larger framework, some galaxies will develop secondary features like spiral arms or bar-like structures, some of which will be transitory and some of which will persist.” [8] The developing of secondary features is called galactic evolution. No cosmological theory except the BBT can explain galactic evolution. [9] Stronger evidence for the Big Bang is the abundance of light elements, such as helium, in the universe. “Like in the core of our Sun, the free protons and neutrons in the early universe underwent nuclear fusion, producing mainly helium nuclei (He-3 and He-4), with a dash of deuterium (a form of hydrogen with a proton-neutron nucleus), lithium and beryllium. Unlike those in the Sun, the reactions only lasted for a brief time thanks to the fact that the universe's temperature and density were dropping rapidly as it expanded. This means that heavier nuclei did not have a chance to form during this time. Instead, those nuclei formed later in stars. Elements with atomic numbers up to iron are formed by fusion in stellar cores, while heavier elements are produced during supernovas.” [8] He-3 and He-4 are abundant in the universe, and this is the best physical explanation. [10] Therefore, the Big Bang cosmological model is probably true. The Big Bang cosmological model states that the universe was created 13.7 billion years ago. As the BBT is true, this prediction is the most likely time for the origin of the universe.C2) Nature originated prior to lifeThe earliest identified organisms were minute and relatively featureless, and their fossils look like small rods, which are very difficult to tell apart from structures that arise through abiotic physical processes. The oldest undisputed evidence of life on Earth, interpreted as fossilized bacteria, dates to 3 Ga. [11] The earliest possible origin for life, according to a biological consensus, is around 3.8 billion years ago. [12] As life originated 3.8 Ga at the earliest, while the universe originated 13.75 billion years ago, the resolution is securely negated. ConclusionMost biological evidence suggests life originated billions of years after the formation of the universe, and approximately 1 billion years after the formation of the Earth. Therefore, life originated after nature. The resolution is negated. References[1] http://goo.gl...[2] http://goo.gl...[3] http://goo.gl...[4] http://goo.gl...[5] http://goo.gl...[6] http://goo.gl...[7] http://goo.gl...[8] http://goo.gl...[9] http://goo.gl...[10] Astrophys. J. Suppl. 97:49-58, 1995. (http://goo.gl...)[11] http://physwww.mcmaster.ca...;[12] http://www.nature.com...;