BLM should focus on black-black crime in poor neighborhoods instead of police brutality

The first thing I noticed was that all of your sources are very biased but hell, I forgive it because it's impossible to find a completely neutral news source now a days.First Paragraph:You're sources are questionable, not because they are biased but because their stats are questionable. You claim mine (102) is wrong and yours are right (258, 306). So now we have three numbers on the table, all of which are very different. I'm not saying mine is correct by default but you claim the number is higher but can't decide which. I've done some digging and 258 appears to be the most reasonable between the two. The Guardian claim there are more black people killed but can't come up with stories for the missing 48 not accounted for by The Washington Post.Yes, you're correct, those numbers don't matter because the number would still need to be ~17 times higher to match of black-on-black murders. Now lets discuss in detail you're other organizations "that deal with interracial crime within the community". Survive AliveThis one has not a damn thing to do with violence. It is for educating kids about fire safety which in the context of this discussion doesn't help them unless there is a string of arsons in their area.http://www.survivealivemilwaukee.com...http://survivealive.org... http://survivealivehouse.com...Running RebelsAgain, nothing to do with crime. Their mission "Running Rebels Community Organization is dedicated to developing Milwaukee youth mentally, physically and spiritually". So unless the kids can run away from a gang member or use their new found spiritual capabilities to calm the attacker this organization does nothing for crime.http://runningrebels.org...http://runningrebels.org...Rainbow PUSH CoalitionThis is the only one that says anything about crime. They have six main issues only one of which discuss crime. They even claim to be a "multi-issue" oriented organization. And to boot, judging by their news feed the gun violence and justice they are talking about is that of police shootings. So not only is it not a national organization, it doesn't specialize in crime and instead focuses on police brutality.http://www.rainbowpush.org...And even if all of these organizations dealt with crime they are not recognized national like BLM and most of them are only in Milwaukee (perhaps where you live?). So with all of this information BLM deciding to focus on black-on-black murder would make a difference considering these groups are doing nothing about it."Most violent crime is interracial." The article is horrendous, not only does its click bait advertising hint towards its poor reliability the writer is obviously hysterical claiming the term "black-on-black crime" enables racists. I will do a quick debunk of each point to negate your point.1) 84% of white murder victims were white: Not sure what this has to do with black-on-black crime, in fact this reinforces the fact that most murders are between people of the same race.2) Whites kill more whites than black people kill each other: The article lays down some numbers which I am going to assume are roughly correct. 3,172 white people were killed by other whites and 2,695 black people were killed by other blacks. Sure white people kill more of their own in numbers but proportionally black people are killing more of their population. Whites are killed by other white only 1.2 times more than the amount of black people killed by other blacks. The white population however is ~5 times larger than the black population so that means, proportionally, black people are killing each other at a rate ~4 times higher than whites3) White people commit crimes more than any other race: With the couple of crime stats they gave white people commit the crime 2/3 of the time while black people commit them 1/3 of the time. White people are 2/3 the population while blacks are only 13% this means that white people are committing the "normal" amount of crime for their population size while black people are committing the same crimes at rates 3 times higher4) White people kill more members of vulnerable populations than any other race: does it matter what age is being killed?Putting this fact in there suggests that Children and the Elderly are more important than everyone else. The age of the victims doesn't matter, the number of victims matters.5) Gang murders are most common among white gangs: The stats are as follows: gang murders are committed by 53.3% whites and 42.2% blacks. I've done this enough times. Whites are 2/3 of the population and 13% black. You do the math, blacks are committing proportionally more gang murders for whites.Moving on, give me an example of a coordinated event by BLM protesting black-on-black crime and I'll believe you. The vox article surely doesn't prove anything. I'd like to focus on number 4 on that article. Aren't there way more white victims of police violence?: Their answer is yes there are but proportionally speaking black people are killed more. It's funny how all your other articles does account for proportions but the second using proportions helps your argument you'll use it.