The God Hypothesis is a valid Scientific theory

Alternative Hypothesis When I said that the personal absolute mind created other human minds I was talking about the law of biogenisis and possibly the theory of information. It makes no difference because the mere fact that this being created life in the first place is evidence that this being is interested in human affairs and consicious as well as personal. Omni-present, eternal, and immaterial Since CON's assertion was not very clear, Let me try to interpret CON's objection correctly. If CON is trying to say that Cause and effect relations ONLY happen under separate moments in time, then he needs to prove this claim. If CON is instead saying that we don't have a large sample size of causes without spacial or temporal dimensions, then he is wrong because I pointed that human minds have no Spacial or temporal constraints. This was the whole point of showing the mind-body dualism which was unchallenged by CON. Personal Absolute Mind Let me clear up something that I made about this argument. I was not using the existence of abstract objects and human minds as confirmation evidence for my hypothesis. I was trying to falsify it to provide evidence as to why it could not be a human mind or abstract number that created the finely-tuned universe but another entity. Experiments based on falsifying something is another way of providing evidence. All-powerful and all-knowing Perhaps, I was trying to not sound too phiolosphical and was not as clear enough in the process. The expansion rate of the universe will continue to accelerate forever. The definition of power is the rate at which energy is transferred, used, or transformed. Since the cosmological constant is a product of fine-tuning, it shows that there's potentially an infinite degree of power or rates of acceleration being exerted to expand the universe. Thus, this attribute is omni-potent Life from non life Again, Depending on how you define life apart from us, you could probably say that life possibly could form from non-living matter if CON provided evidence that RNA is self-replicating. However, CON's source did not show evidence that RNA was the actual self-replicating giving rise to DNA and proteins. In addition, even If CON did provide evidence that RNA came first, it would not provide evidence that carbon based life that contain DNA information. According to information theory, information must come from outside a system and ,thus, you cannot say that our life ,which is presently understood to require RNA, protein, and DNA, can come from non-life. This is more important because my hypothesis depends on the understanding that we as consicious personal human beings were created by another personal conscious being that would be the first cause. Now, although, I forgot to mention the theory of information and did not specifically explain what I meant by life as we know it. This is not me bringing in new arguments because I mentioned in round three that I am speaking of life as it is presently understood to be carbon based life forms when I mentioned the law of biogensis. Mind body Dualism Just in case, CON decides to challenge my claim all of a sudden without me responding, I am going to anticipate it by providing a counterargument: CON is confusing the concept of the correlation of two events with the concept of the identity of two events. It simply does not follow from the fact that two events are correlated that they are identical. Correlation does not prove causation. There is the fact that movements of bodily limbs like arms and legs are correlated with events in the motor cortex of the brain. No one believes, however, that movements of arms and legs are identical with their causal antecedents in the brain. Upon reflection, it is just as obvious that there is no good reason to believe that psychological events are identical with brain events simply because the two are correlated. Again, CON must provide evidence that there is a region in the brain that causes these mental events when it comes to intention states and decisions or will power that are not determined by basic biological functions but by outside influences. Otherwise, my argument stands here as well. I ran out of time. The voters will figure it out.