Brian Eggleston's Breastguard™ electric bras would be a "stunning" success!

I've always liked out chemistry labs. We perform experiments that end in cool results: Careful measurements render accurate calculations; mixing two different stuffs creates an entirely new stuff; and once in a while, we even get to play with fire. As you could imagine that day, she was the cherry to the already-great-day on top. My normal lab partner, Jefferey, was ditching. I would have felt bad (he was just ditching to avoid two tests and a project) had it not been for the fact that Samantha was my replacement partner. Imagine the best clichï¿½ of a smoking hot Asian girl you can think of, then think harder. Long dark hair, curvy (but by no means skinny) body, and a face spewing curiosity and innocence. Oh joy. We finished the lab, and we went on talking. As she continued bitching about her teachers, her voice seemed to drift away. I noticed she was wearing the most skimpy clothes I had ever seen. The top of her breasts were clearly exposed, her skirt left little to the imagination, and her little-jacket-thing accentuated her beautiful figure. I was in total horny teenager mode. Then... SLAP!!! Apparently, I was staring at her breasts. Ooops. ---- Joe's Arbitrary Section Separator (*SS)™ ---- I'd like to remind Brian that he bears the proof in proving the resolution "Brian Eggleston's Breastguard™ electric bras would be a 'stunning' success!" He has made no attempt at proving this resolution, so I have nothing to rebut. Also, I sincerely hope we don't get into semantics (i.e. "By the resolution's very design, it's literally 'stunning'!"). if my opponent goes that route, please ignore his statements. Semantics, as I'm sure most people, are an absurd strategy. That said, here are some objections that immediately come to mind: 1) Your product will lead to the extinction of the human race. Men and lesbians will become afraid of engaging in any flirtation whatsoever with women. I mean, I thought a slap was bad, but I'll gladly turn the other cheek if my alternative is a "very nasty shock". Women, or anyone for that matter, can not be trusted with such a useless weapon. 2) You claim your idea will prevent "sex-fiends who surreptitiously grope [women] in crowded places." You continue by writing that "a high-voltage electric shock" would be given to those who make "the mistake of messing with [a woman's] melons". Now, if a lady were in a crowded subway train, for example, and someone, a man for the sake of argument, were to accidentally bump into a women wearing your product, he would be unjustly shocked. To make my point clear, those who accidentally bump into wearers will receive the same punishment as potential rapists. Clearly, that is not right. 2a. Furthermore, women, often times more so than men, have a strong sense of empathy. Thus, they will stop using your product in fear of hurting more people. Indeed, they will tell their friends not to by the product, and soon, your product will be given a bad name. 3) Practical issues. How is this product going to maintain a high voltage shock for a full eight hour day? Will this product weigh too much? With all the materials that go into making such an intricate piece of underwear, will the profit margin even exist, much less be enough to keep on manufacturing them? How can electricity be conducted through this "Aerogel"? There are simply too many practical issues to make this a successful product. That's all for now. I'll come back with more in my R2. Thank you, Brian, for creating this debate, and thank y'all, the audience, for reading it. I now leave the floor to my opponent.