Theories against the Resurrection of Jesus Christ are incorrect

To begin, I would fist like to prove that the tomb of Christ was indeed empty. The Testimony of Women The fact that all four Gospels of the New Testament state that women were the first witnesses to the empty tomb is extremely significant for this reason: the testimony of women in Jewish culture at the time was considered less than that of a man's (1). If indeed the narrative of the empty tomb was a lie, then why wouldn't the authors of the Gospels claim that men were the first witnesses, thus providing more credibility to the story? If you wanted people to fall for your lie, then you would want to obtain testimony from sources perceived to be credible! The Inability of the Jews to Produce a Body If the disciples of Jesus claimed to have seen Christ come back to life in bodily form, all the Jews would have to do is produce the body of Christ to completely snuff out the Christian religion and any of it's credibility. The fact that they couldn't achieve this simple feat (it would have been something they definitely wanted to do) says that indeed the tomb must have been empty and the Jews could produce the body of Christ. Also, I would like the refute a few arguments against the Resurrection of Christ. The Stolen Body hypothesis The Stolen Body Hypothesis basically says that the reason the tomb of Jesus was empty was because his disciples stole the body in order to fake the resurrection and claim that Jesus was truly the Messiah. My fist argument against this hypothesis is that according to the Gospels themselves, the disciples of Jesus wouldn't have even tried to steal the body because they were fleeing or in hiding (2) and didn't even know that Jesus was supposed to come back to life from the dead (3). But let's assume that the apostles did indeed attempt the feat of stealing the body of Jesus. Considering that there were Roman guards stationed at the tomb of Christ (4), and sleeping on the job was punishable by death, how did the disciples manage to overcome these guards? Also, if the disciples had indeed stolen the body and faked the resurrection, why were they so willing to become victims of martyrdom? It would not be logical to suffer prolonged torture or even death for something you know is completely false. The Swoon Theory This theory says that Jesus never actually died but was simply unconscious and managed to escape from inside the tomb (5). If we agree that the description of how Jesus was executed in the New Testament is accurate, it is simply ridiculous to believe that Jesus somehow managed to survive lashings, crucifixion, and having a spear thrust into his chest. Even if he did survive the ordeal, how did he have the power to survive inside the tomb with no food, water, or medical care for a period of three (or maybe a little less) days? And let's assume that yes, he did manage to go without food, water, or medical care after the Romans tried to execute him. How then, in his current state, did he manage to open up the tomb he was in and overpower the guards at his tomb? I challenge Con to refute the above arguments but also provide other arguments against the Resurrection. Sources: (1) . http://www.gotquestions.org... (2) Mark 14:50 (3) John 20:9 (4) Matthew 27:64 - 66 (5) . http://en.wikipedia.org...