Theistic evolution is a way to explain animals and humans today

Skulls do show evolution! "Yet again, I need to press for an answer. There is NO good reason to assume evolution over a god creating things with common DNA. Your point was included in my question."Proved that there is a big reason last round"I hold this belief that god does not exist, but obviously you have no idea as well even if we did assume he was real."Make this clearer. I have no idea what you are implying here."I fail to see how this proves evolution, nor how it would help humans survive.Evolution is:"The gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form"See. Even if evolution is not for the better, it can become more complex. This would make humans more complex. Evolution starts from simple mutations. As an increased number of people are born with this, it may eventually be the new form of human in many years."Has pro shown how this somehow makes humans better, why it had to be evolution, and how it must have been the Christian god specifically? Not even one statement showed that."Fine Lets just say any god. I did not post in the original guidelines that rule."You've proved nothing..."That is debatable to say the least."I think I answered this when I showed how simultaneous causation can create universes. This is the exact theory:Three states of the universe come into being at the same time, State A causes B, which causes state C, which causes state A; all at the same time. The cause and effect exist simultaneously, all having causal explanations.I must ask you, why assume evolution and god over simultaneous causation and the multiverse...?Pro's question was asserting that we cannot explain where the universe came from. He then rattles off a list of random things that he has no idea who or what created them,then concludes that it must have been a who and that being is god.This is simply an argument from ignorance [1]"I asked you the question and you continue to dodge them. You can't answer them, so you call them an "argument of ignorance." The reason why I accept god over the multi universe theory is that someone would have had to make the universes and their components. The theory makes no sense. If they are exact copies, then they would have the same result."No. I do not have to accept your assertion that a god created the ancestor first, as I'm clearly arguing against evolution."If you can't disprove it just say it."No. I do not have to accept your assertion that a god created the ancestor first, as I'm clearly arguing against evolution.1. If evolution is not true, Pro's contention fails.2. Evolution has not been proven by Pro...3. Therefore, his third contention fails."Highly debatable. Cooldudebro's closing arguments:May I remind you that DudeStop's job is to prove theistic evolution impossible. I suggest he hasn't come close to proving that yet.What I proved:1. Evolution is true2. You need god to do it3. My opponent can not even attempt to disprove many of my points.4. My opponent dodged many questions.5. He dropped my arguments on skulls.I think I have met my BOP in stating that theistic evolution is a way to explain animals and humans today