Everyone Who Believes in God is Most Likely Delusional

We know theists are most likely have incorrect beliefs, because they all hold different beliefs, and they cannot all be trueMy opponent objects to this statement made by me. My opponent argues "1st of all, So what if "they cannot all be true", I only need one."The relosution is that theists are most likely delusional. I aregued that theists most likely have incorrect beliefs. So, even if one theists had the exact version of God, theists still would be most likely incorrect, and therefore(because of my other arguments) most likely delusional.My opponent continues "2nd of all, do you really think every single theist has a different idea about god?"Yes, I think everyone has a different idea of God, even if it is by only one detail. Even under the same religion, some theists believe heaven is difficult to get in, some easy, some think that being gay is a sin, some say its okay, some think Jesus loves Capitalism, some Socialism, some think God would stop school shootings if religion was preached in schools, some do not, some are YEC, some are not, ect.It is fair to say that not many have the same version of God. Even if a group does have the same version. Say, a group of 100 agree on every detail about religion that group would be small compared to the majority of theists, so still even if that large group was correct, theists(in whole) are most likely incorrectSome Theists Become Atheists/Agnostics...These Theists are not DelusionalI argued that theists are not just mistaken because theist's beliefs are held without reason and regardless of fact. My opponent claims that there are theists who become atheists and these theists consider facts. He argues "The simplest way to show that not all theists are like that is the fact that some theists become agnostic/atheist, when presented with certain arguments. "I agree that when someone becomes an atheist/agnostic, they are no longer delusional because they consider fact. However, when they were theists, they were delusional. For example, when Dawkins decided to become an atheist, he no longer was delusional, however, as a theist, Dawkins was delusional. Some atheists become theists*First Note that Anthony Flew was not a Theist but a Deist. [1]"I should clarify that I am a deist."-Anthony Flew [2]My opponent argues that some atheists become theists. These theists must surely have reason or fact, he argues. But this is not the case. As a baby, every one is an atheist. The fact that they were atheists before, does not mean that they believe based on reason and fact. It still can be said that theists(even if previously atheists), believe in supernatural ideas that are most likely false and hold them without reason and regardless of fact.Theists are not just faith but reasonMy opponent argues that it is a common misconception that theist live without reason. "He says theists do have reason.This misconception arouse as a result of the fact that many do believe in the concept of faith beyond reason.But it ignores the many theists who do deal with evidence." I understant that theists also use reason, however, most theists hold their beliefs through faith, even if it is a combo of faith and reason, it still uses faith. And for reasons stated earlier, if they hold beliefs based on faith, they are delusional.Furthermore, my opponent says there are reasoned arguments for god "There are many arguments for god, including; several cosmological arguments (thomistic version being my current favorite), teleological, ontological, Arguments from fulfilled prophesies, etc." These are not arguments for theism, but for deism. So, they do not apply. The only argument here for theism is arguments from fuffiled prophecies, which is not reasonable at all. All holy books contain fuflled prophecies, so how do you choose which religion? Furthermore any reasonable person understands that "fuffilled prophecies" are no reason to think a book is divine. Most can be fuffilled by random chance. Nostradamus sniped may "prophecies", would you base your life on a book written by him, because he must have been divine.[3]*also maybe my opponent will object that deism=someone who believes in God, however, I will post my forum posts that started this debate...I think I was clear that I was cool with deismMy (twocupcake's) forum posts that inspired the debate"I may be an agnostic or a deist, but I don't believe that people talk to God, or God answers prayers. So, if you believe you are meditating, that is fine. But, if you believe that you are talking to a supernatural being, you are delusional. Calling talking to God magic is not really ignorance, as God is magic. Where magic=supernatural.""People have "prayed and talked" to every God...Thor, Zeus, Spaggetti Monster, Odin ect. They cannot all be talking to there God. So, even if you can talk to God, there is no way of knowing which God it is you are talking to. You could be talking to the Flying Spaggetti Monster!"You also agree that many theists are delusional, right? Do you think people actually talked to Allah, Zeus, Thor, Pagan or Mayan Gods. Just like me you think many are delusional. I just go one more to include your religion also as delusional.Again with Smart PeopleIf all the "smart people" my opponent mentioned are theists, then they are delusional. I clarified this last round. I am confused and do not know what to make of my opponent giving a list of smart people. Is is that smart people can't be delusional? If it is, I debunked it. In addition to "smart people" there are theist "athletes" and "musician"...I fail to see your argument. Sorry, I would respond again if I had any idea what your line of reason was.SummaryMy opponent argues that there could be a correct theist, if so not all theistss would be delusional, this is not truebecause the resolution is "most likely" delusional. Just as if 100 people help raffle tickets, raffle ticket holders are most likely going to lose.My opponent argues that some theists are not delusional because they will become atheists when they look at the facts,but this is not true because as theists they still were delusionalMy opponent argues that some atheists become theists,and these theists think to base belief about facts, no all theists were atheits befoe indocrination, being a atheist before does not show reason ectMy opponent lists arguments for God, but these are arguments for deism, not theismMy opponent lists the prophecie argument, but this is not based on reasonMy opponent mentions "smart theists" again, smart people can be delusional, I have no idea what more he is trying to prove[1] http://en.wikipedia.org......\[2] http://www.tothesource.org......[3]http://en.wikipedia.org......