Is equality a good objective

The question," s equality a good objective..." The word "equality," and what is meant when someone uses the expression is subjective and the words significance is different when used to define different objectives. The word Equality when used by a cleric means the equality of each being as a human, Equality when used in reference to individuals in a court of law means another. A human's worth can be evaluated based on whatever the value is of the substances of the human body if harvested. The value of anything is the rarity of a particular thing , a mineral a talent for example, that's exceptional. Equality between individuals when artificially granted or demanded by government doesn't, by governments action, make everyone equal or cause equality to exist between individuals as only environment and nature determines the level of equality between humans. You stated," our argument stems from the idea that physical capacity should correlate with each individual's worth. In such a sense, A person capable of many things is worth more and therefore not equal to one capable of only a few things. It follows from such a statement that capacity has intrinsic worth. The value of each individual to society is easily demonstrated as it is every day in the real world, for example, if a individual has a skill or a degree in a specialized field, needed by a company would that company if it attempted to hire someone for a position offer the same pay to the person who hadn't the same qualifications as the individual with the degree in a specialized field or skill, we all know the answer to this question. So these individuals are both equal as humans but not in capabilities and qualifications, society recognizes the difference and is willing to pay for that difference. Would you, in suggesting equality is the goal and should be accepted by all. would you be perfectly happy and be confident in allowing the janitor working at the hospital to preform surgery on you or would you discriminate and recognize the fact that equality between individuals doesn't apply here. You Stated," Fairness is a complicated concept. What is fair to some may not be so to others. Also, as I've already established, the worth of capabilities is subjective. Who then is to be the arbitrator of what is fair, humans who are in position of arbitrators of "fairness," suffer the same frailties that all human being have as having particular interests and prejudices that would effect their vision of what "fairness" is. The issue of "equality," isn't altruistic as it would on the surface first might appear to be by those who parade and tout their deep concern for their fellow man, but in many instances is purely politically motivated. Why are the liberal and intellectual elite so invested in pushing the concept of Equality, it is a method used by them to instigate unrest among America's citizens by appearing to sympathize and point out that they are victims of an unjust society. Robert H. Bork in his book," SLOUCHING TOWARDS GOMORROW," wrote, " We have become what Charles J. Sykes called a nation of victims. The list of victim groups-minorities, women, homosexuals, the disabled, the obese, the young, the old-is virtually endless..." Equality is just another convenient tool of those who wish to disrupt America' government and cause hostility between America's citizens and were quick to put the issue out there to stir up animosity and disrupt and tear down our society.