God Exists

Yes, excuse me for my mistake. Round 4 will be the closing statements. Anyhow, onward with the debate. I. Lack of EvidenceIdeally it doesn't take much to understand that no solid evidence to prove the existence of "God" has actually been provided. Some people claim they had seen "Him" before personally, others openly admit that no evidence exists to suggest the existence of this beyond-our-understanding entity. A very common argument among the religious population [mainly within Christianity] is that faith does not rely on evidence, and that is the miracle of faith. Though this argument still makes no sense. For example, some arguments from the devout are that prayer works if it is not from a place of greed, but from a place of trade [e.g "I will give you x for y]. It is highly illogical to commit oneself to a being beyond their understanding of which cannot be proven. But another big idea is the "seeing is believing" concept, which also adds to the conflict between the theist and atheist populaces. As the religious argue that though you cannot see "God", "He" does exist. And in fact an analogy was made in which the comparison between "God" and air was made; since humans apparently can't see air, but can still feel it. Christians concluded that though "God" cannot be seen, "He" can be felt. Which is absolutely false. And the very basis of this argument is that because humans feel happy when they pray, or go to a house of worship, or do something the faithful would do, that it is proof that "God" exists because that is the result of having a spiritual connection to "Him". But still the point does not prove the existence of such a being regardless. And the claim that air cannot be seen is beyond ridiculous. Not only can air be felt, it can be seen as well. Such forms as water vapour, steam and gases of different kinds [soot from factories, fire, smoke] are very clearly visible to the naked eye. In fact, tornadoes and hurricanes are the result of contact between hot and cold air in a convection-like process where both intensely cycle, and both are quite literally cyclones made of air - and are very visible. And even if some people felt happy after praying, or going to a house of worship, it doesn't prove that "God" exists, it just proves that they are getting their hopes up and feeling spiritual. In the same way that some may work themselves up and become sick because of their paranoia, imagination and fear are powerful effects of having a brain, and the faithful often feel them. II. Creation of UniverseAnother common conflict between the two is the question of how the creation of the universe came to be. While most scientists [as well as atheists] theorize that the universe came about through a process called 'the big bang theory', in which a nebulae compromised of material such as copper, nickel, iron, and other solids that molded the planets blew up and produced the universe gradually and over a large span of time. While the theists of the world theorize that a supernatural being had done it. A common counter-claim to the big bang theory is question of where the material to shape the universe came from - seeing as it logically have to have an origin - as the material could not arbitrarily appear. But the theists fail to realize that their plugging in of "God" is doing the exact same thing - and is conceding that the universe was formed by a being whose origin is not known, and thus the counter-claim can be flipped to dismantle either side. However, atheists are more likely to admit that they lack the knowledge of exactly how the universe started, whereas theists are not. A quick Google search could satisfy the need to see some scientific explanations for the process by which stars explode, form, and other celestial objects undergo the same process, but theists offer a more illogical explanation; one by which a randomly appearing man in space had formed the universe in a matter of a week [or so]. Scientists have worked since the discovery of advancement in astronomical and interstellar equipment to conclude logical statements about the formation of planets, and though the theories have not been 100% proven, they do foot the bill more than the "God" complex.