I am GOD

Since the BOP is on the Pro to prove that he is God, I will simply refute his points. Since he would then not be able to sufficiently prove that he is God, it's enough to merit me the win as Con. If characters allow, I will present arguments in a case of my own. But before I begin, for clarity's sake, I'd like to define God as the general characteristics of the Judeo/Christian God (i. e. omniscient, omnipresent, perfect, etc. ) The pro must adhere to my defintion since he failed to provide one in his last speech, thus leaving it up to me to clarify on the debate. Now to the refutations: 1. This is a solipsystic reality and you are merely part of my consciousness. While this certainly may be true:1. This doesn't make you God. This makes you mentally unstable.2. There's no reason as to why you aren't part of MY consciousness, thus making me God.3. If nothing existed except for you, you wouldn't have created anything, thus would only be existing alone. Thus, you cannot be defined as God. 2. A human body is made up of trillions of cells. ..1. He literally cites this argument that, obviously, needs cited evidence to back it up without citing evidence to back it up. Thus, we can presume it's just an assertion of his and therefore false.2. Our control cannot extend past the range of our cells because there are many cell functions that we do not control. Meiosis, Meitosis, Cellular Apoptosis, etc. There are also many organ functions, made up by individual cells, that we do not control. We do not control whether our heart beats or not, we do not control whether or not our nervous system sends signals throughout our body, etc. 3. If one person is the universe, the universe cannot be everything because anything that was not that one person would not be the universe. Thus, this argument fails.3. I created everything, then gave up my power and walked away from it.1. No proof. I could claim just the same and it would be evaluated as equally true, since neither of our claims are warranted with evidence. 4. I am God, but one not as usually understood as such by a developed nation.1. Even if this is true, you'd still have to adhere to the definiton provided by myself above.2. No proof. I could claim the same and both of our assertions would have to be weighed as equal and contradicting, thus negating each other. 5. I legally changed my name to God1. Pictures of the official document authorizing your legal change in name or it didn't happen. And since I don't think you will be able to provide said pictures, this is false.2. Even if you did change your name, a name does not define who we are as a person. I. e. I might be called a jock, but this does not mean I like sports or play football all the time.6. I am God but you would be unable to perceive it as such.1. No warrant. I can definetely prove I am not a butterfly by the physical anatomy of my body.2. No warrant to why this makes you God.3. This falsly assumes that you already are God, which is what we are debating here.4. There's no evidence as to why your 'true reality' is the actual true reality. It could possibly be that you are the 'butterfly' and I am the God that you cannot perceive. Since I have successfully rebuked his arguments, this is sufficient to vote con since he is currently failing to meet his BOP. But since I have plenty of characters to spare, I will give reasons as to why, under my given definition of God, he is not God.1. God would be omniscient. You cannot currently see me and see my thoughts. Thus, you are not omniscient, and thus are not God.2. God is omnipotent, capable of doing everything. You failed to receive your notification round two that it was your turn to argue. Thus, you are not omnipotent. Thus, you are not God.3. God is perfect. You are not perfect because a) You lied by saying that you are God, b) you failed to compete in every round successfully, c) you did not perfectly win this debate, and d) you did not win this debate at all. Thus, you cannot be perfect. Thus, you cannot be God. For all of the above reasons, I submit that my opponent is not God, but rather that I am.