Mosquitos kill more people than sharks.

[Voters: The following argument will be in the form of SATIRE. Satirical debates follow standard debate rules, but have arguments that are often silly. Usually they have an underlying message that they try to convey, wrapped in a coat of irony. They are usually very fun. After this bracket, my entire debate will satirical. I may even argue against "satires" while being satirical, so please don't be confused, but vote, laugh, and think according to the flow. Please enjoy! (I will be playing the role of a mosquito.)]I'd like to thank SweetCrackerJack for the interesting debate topic. Definition of "people:" "the men, women, and children of a particular nation, community, or ethnic group.[1]" As the dominant species, this is obviously referring to mosquitoes, since humans are too unintelligent to form nations. My opponent's arguments revolve around the idea that we mosquitoes "kill" more than sharks do. I will oppose these claims in a number of ways:Contention 1: We do not "kill;" diseases that we carry kill. We are simply trying to survive. Sucking the blood of mammals is a natural part of our life cycle [2]. We are born with a proboscis; it is natural for us suck blood [2].Contention 2: Human lives aren't as valuable as mosquito lives, and therefore "killing" should be measured in terms of mosquito lives lost. Why humans? You aren't even mentioning mosquito lives lost! This is animal rights gone way too far, my friend. Subpoint A: We mosquitoes kill each other exactly as often as sharks kill us: Zero. [2] Therefore, mosquitoes do not kill more than people do.Contention 3: Even if you buy that we and not our diseases are causing the death of humans, "killing" humans is pest control and saves valuable mosquito lives. While we mosquitoes are not responsible for these diseases that are outside our control, humans are literally designing diseases to kill us [3]. It is no secret that humans love to kill us. Here's an example of some equipment that we believe humans intentionally developed to kill mosquitoes [7, 8]. Just a few human death saves hundreds or even thousands of mosquito lives. Don't let my opponent's hippy arguments throw you off. Think of the larvae [9]!Contention 4: Even if you were to measure "killing" to be in terms of all creatures, by controlling the population of humans we are saving trillions of insect lives and even the lives of mammals in the long term, since humans are destroying the earth through pollution and global warming [4, 5, 6]. Short rebuttal:My opponent suggests that wikipedia "proves" her/his argument. Firstly, this is not the case, since all four of my contentions would be successful even if all your arguments prove true.Secondly, you do not cite your source. You just say it comes from wikipedia. How am I supposed to find out whether your information is accurate?Additionally, you say "due to scientific studies" and refuse to cite anything. All of your arguments are based on "evidence," but because you don't provide sources I can't analyze any of it. Also, I think my opponent's assumption that we have diseases is very offensive. It is not "my malaria;" I happen to have been born with malaria. Her/his argument is very insensitive. My brother was swatted by a human simply because the human assumed that he had milaria. That was the worst hour of my life.Remember, my opponent does not provide a single source about mosquitoes or humans, and doesn't cite the passage on shark attacks on humans.Thanks! Looking forward to a fun debate.[1]https://www.google.com...[2] http://en.wikipedia.org..., http://www.mosquitoes.org...[3] http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu...[4] http://www.mnn.com...[5] http://dsc.discovery.com...[6] http://www.nrdc.org...[7]http://www.skeeterdefeater.com...[8] http://www.wikihow.com...[9]http://www.ask.com...