9/11: All conspiracy theories about 9/11 are painfully false.

The events of September 11th, 2001 on the face seems like a horrible attack carried out by the most evil terrorist group on the planet (ISIS is starting to take that role...), Al Qaeda. While I believe 2 planes were involved, I do not believe 4 planes were involved. Let's start my arguments with the events in my home state of New YorkIn New York, 2 airplanes flew in to two symbols of America: the Twin Towers that made up building 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center. For me, this would have been enough for me to believe that this was a terrorist attack. However, three buildings imploded, all at free fall speed, in the same style as a controlled demolition. How could this be possible? All 3 buildings pancaked right down, doing minimal damage to the buildings surrounding them. Each floor was bolted in to place by about 10000 bolts and nuts. This means all floors of all three buildings had to have been weakened. This is highly unlikely because heat travels upwards, not downwards, so there should have been some sort of stopping towards the bottom of the buildings. But instead, we've got a dust pile at the bottom. Also, people who just barely made it out heard explosions from the twin towers before they started to fall down. Were these the floors banging in to each other? Possibly. I wasn't there, so I cannot verify this, but from what people said, it sounded like explosions. When asked about a picture taken of one of the planes, Boeing said that the second plane to hit did not fit the design of any of their planes. Many witnesses said it looked like a military plane, having no windows on it. So, why couldn't have just been fires that brought the buildings down? Well, if you revisit the film from that day, you will notice both buildings billowing an insane amount of smoke. Smoke means that the fire is weak. A strong fire would have had a lot of visible flame and sparks and little smoke. If you take the burning temperature of jet fuel, and take the temperature that steel starts to get fatigued, you will see how it is unlikely that the buildings fell do to fatigue, as the fatigue in metal doesn't start until way after the burning point of jet fuel. Also, if fatigue was the answer, than only the floors that received the heat should have collapsed not the otherwise sturdy floors. Let's look at that third building that everyone seems to forget about. The leaser of the building is quoted saying to the fire chief to "pull it", a term used in demolition to set off charges to demolish and implode a building. This building was also not directly hit by a plane, only debris. If you look at the footage of a few new reports of the building as it falls, you will notice what seems to be explosive charges of a controlled demolition going off. The building also fell down in the exact way a demolished building would fall. If you notice, like a controlled demolition, the middle of the building started to fall first. This is done so that the building falls inward, doing minimal damage to it's surroundings. A person inside said building also said he heard and saw explosions coming from inside the walls. After he made this claim, a week later he was hospitalized and died of unknown causes.Let's revisit the two planes. So, how did we find out who were in the planes that hit the buildings? We found their passports. But, we couldn't recover a blackbox? a Passport, a tiny booklet that should have died with the suicide bomber was found in the wreckage... but not a blackbox designed to stay intact for reasons like these attacks. Now, why don't I believe that there were 2 more planes involved? The lack of debris and bodies. There was not enough heat to burn up so much metal and people and turn it in to nothing but tracks. In the Pentagon, some parts of the plane should have been visible, but they were not. Also, take a measurement of the hole and the plane. They are not a match. Also, if you look closely at the wreckage, you will notice there are perfectly intact papers and books. Why? Why don't we see fire or ash? In fact, looking at the footage of the date, you will see there was very little fire. Again, only smoke shows. Also, surrounding businesses had surveillance cameras that had footage of the area of the pentagon that was damaged had the recordings taken away short moments afterwards by FBI, only to be destroyed later. There are also many unanswered questions about the events. Was the events of September 11th caused by terrorists, or the United States government? I will not speak in absolutes. I cannot say yes or no. Look at the evidence yourself, though.