BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Is it possible to romantically love more than one person

1.I agree that romantic love is a strong emotional bond between two people where both parties share the same love and compassion for one another. 2.Romantic love does not have to be known or seen by everyone around a person in order for it to exist. 3.Two people do not have to commit themselves to each other for the rest of their lives in order to be in romantic love. 4.You do not have to get married to your partner in order to show you are committed to them. There are many people that stay in relationships and have families with each other and never get married. This does not mean that they are not committed to each other or that they"re not in romantic love. 5.I do not agree that people have to date in order to fall in love. Many times people start out as friends and then realize that there are stronger feelings there than that of just a platonic love. 6.I agree that just because two people date does mean that they are committed to each other. 7.I do not agree that dating does not constitute being in love. There are many people who are dating that are romantically in love with their partner. Just because two people get married does mean that they are more romantically in love with one another than another couple that is not married. 8.Many people in relationships cheat for different reasons. There are also reasons that romantic bonds are broken. However, this does not mean that these two people were never romantically in love with one another just because things did not work out. 9.Romantic bonds are not always broken because a person has cheated, broken up, or divorced. While this is sometimes the case, it isn"t the case all of the time. 10.Just because a person cheats on his or her partner does not mean that they were never romantically in love with them. There are certain circumstances where people cheat and it is purely based on sex. While I do not condone cheating, just because a person performs the act of cheating does not mean that they do not or never did romantically their partner. 11.A breakup or divorce does not show that a person gave up on the relationship due to stress. 12.Someone can date a new person even if they are still not over their ex. This happens a lot. Just because they are still in love with their ex does not mean that they cannot date someone else. 13.People don"t have to commit to just one person. Polygamist relationships prove this. They also prove that a person is capable of romantically loving more than one person at the same time.
Eternal life is existing

'While I do think a species similar to ours could exist, I do not think the conditions that were present during the evolution of the life we know on Earth are possible to replicate. The odds that you and me could be having this debate are infinitesimally small, so the idea that a different species will evolve into a separate you and me having this same debate are impossible.' Well even if the odds is infinitely small, its still greater than zero (0). Therefore given infinite time, it will eventually happen. I suggest you to read 'Infinite monkey theorem'. It will give you a insight on what I mean.
Eternal life is existing

I agree with your statement to a point. While I do agree with the possibility of the multiverse theory, I retain my doubts. The basic premise of said theory is that infinite universes exist therefore every situation you can imagine exists in some other universe. Given this premise since I can imagine a universe where this universe can"t exist in any universe at all ever would make this theory fundamentally impossible. Also you say that at another time our exact species could exist. While I do think a species similar to ours could exist, I do not think the conditions that were present during the evolution of the life we know on Earth are possible to replicate. The odds that you and me could be having this debate are infinitesimally small, so the idea that a different species will evolve into a separate you and me having this same debate are impossible.
America should have a Border Wall surrounding it's borders.

hello and thank you for starting this debate. "Jobs... are desperately needed in America right now." what is your basis for this contention? what material would you use for "the wall" and what kind of architecture or architect would you use and how long would "the wall" be? furthermore how would you ship the "material" and where would it come from? what people would apply for this "job?" and will you build said "facilities"? and do these people that "maintain" the facilities need learning experience? how about the "border guards" do they need training? 2. "Anything else that America does not want coming across it's borders." what else would America not want? small latino people? is there a majority vote on what constitutes what America wants? and as for drugs, weapons what makes you say America doesn't want those? and what makes you think Americans don't smuggle weapons into Mexico for the drug cartels. 3. Isn't there a border already and isn't it failing? what kind of cheap labor do you mean? not enough Mickey'ds how bout Wendy's? competition will be easier? why would you want that? and how will businesses and people earn and spend more money? there will be no rise in wages because a lack of something doesn't mean you get something else like money people will just find more people to fill the lawn mowers, so you haven't said why wages will rise, furthermore there probably won't be any raise in wages because you haven't said who's being paid and why they're being paid and how the wall affects them. "businesses and people spending more money demand grows" why will they be spending money and why will demand grow? and a growing demand of what? supply of what? and what demand? what businesses are you talking about? And what are they making or selling that people are buying? Do the employees that these businesses are looking for need training or a sort of specialty in a field or a degree? what unemployed citizens? "all of the above will continue to happen." what? where? in a vacuum world? and why will it be constant? How it's negative 1. material that is needed to build a wall must also be transferred by trucks that spend gas and needs truck drivers to drive them and the material needs buying. 2.all of these people guards, maintenance, architectures, management, and carpenters, are needed to be paid and who besides illegal immigrants are willing to do this sort of job. the guards need training and the training need to be funded. ultimately everyone needs to be paid. conclusion: you said that jobs are desperately needed which implies that people need money and that people are being laid off from their jobs because there is no money. one final question where is the money to pay all these people going to come from? the gov't? that's a very nice way of saying the people isn't it. that seems a bit redundant they're going to pay themselves? the solution can't be throwing more money into the fire to stop the fire. negated
America should have a Border Wall surrounding it's borders.

It is in my firm opinion that America should build a Border Wall on the borders of Mexico and on the borders of Canada. My reasons for this wall are as follows... [1] This will create jobs... Jobs that are desperately needed in America right now. Here are some of the ways it would create jobs... - Through the construction phase of the border wall. This will create work for all the related businesses in the construction of this project. - Through the construction phase of all the buildings for maintenance, faculty, utilities, and storage needed once this project would be completed. - Through the construction of all the roads that will need to be built in order to travel to and from all areas of the border wall. - Through the demand for faculty, border guards, maintenance crew, and any other personnel that would be needed in operating the border wall and adjoining facilities. [2] Having this border wall would greatly diminish the success of drugs, weapons, illegal immigrants, and anything else that America does not want coming across it's borders. [3] Because the number of illegal immigrants that come across the border will be under control, a couple of beneficial things will happen to America. - Due to the lack of cheap labor, wages will rise and competition between small businesses in the labor trades will become easier. - Due to the rise in wages and easier competitive market, businesses and people will earn and spend more money. - Due to businesses and people spending more money, demand grows. - Due to demand growing, businesses will need to produce more supply in order to meet the demand. - Due to businesses needing to fill more demand, they will become more productive, make more money, and need more employees. - Due to businesses becoming more productive, making more money, and needing more employees, job positions are created and filled by unemployed citizens. - Due to these unemployed citizens earnings new income, they contribute to the pool of taxes and stimulate the economy. - Due to the economy being stimulated, all of the above continue to happen. All of these scenarios I have painted are of great benefit to America and I can not think of a single reason on how this border wall could have a negative effect on our Nation's image or health. If you feel that you can give me one... Then accept my debate. Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing your perspective. - Justin Chains -
America should have a Border Wall surrounding it's borders.

I will never debate with you again either and I'm glad we agree on that fact. Your picture shows a reflection of immaturity and general rudeness, which I must conclude reflects your personality, considering you chose it. I carried my burden and gave my reasons for why I feel this wall should be built in the very first round and all you have done is waste my time ever since then. I will copy and paste my reasons again to show how I have carried my burden. It is in my firm opinion that America should build a Border Wall on the borders of Mexico and on the borders of Canada. My reasons for this wall are as follows... [1] This will create jobs... Jobs that are desperately needed in America right now. Here are some of the ways it would create jobs... - Through the construction phase of the border wall. This will create work for all the related businesses in the construction of this project. - Through the construction phase of all the buildings for maintenance, faculty, utilities, and storage needed once this project would be completed. - Through the construction of all the roads that will need to be built in order to travel to and from all areas of the border wall. - Through the demand for faculty, border guards, maintenance crew, and any other personnel that would be needed in operating the border wall and adjoining facilities. [2] Having this border wall would greatly diminish the success of drugs, weapons, illegal immigrants, and anything else that America does not want coming across it's borders. [3] Because the number of illegal immigrants that come across the border will be under control, a couple of beneficial things will happen to America. - Due to the lack of cheap labor, wages will rise and competition between small businesses in the labor trades will become easier. - Due to the rise in wages and easier competitive market, businesses and people will earn and spend more money. - Due to businesses and people spending more money, demand grows. - Due to demand growing, businesses will need to produce more supply in order to meet the demand. - Due to businesses needing to fill more demand, they will become more productive, make more money, and need more employees. - Due to businesses becoming more productive, making more money, and needing more employees, job positions are created and filled by unemployed citizens. - Due to these unemployed citizens earnings new income, they contribute to the pool of taxes and stimulate the economy. - Due to the economy being stimulated, all of the above continue to happen. ************************************************************************************* That was me giving my reasons again for why we should build a border wall. I feel a great loss for having wasted my time in dealing with such an opponent. What reasons has my opponent given in opposition for why this border wall should not be built? My opponent's opposing argument is what? Exactly. Thank you for your time.
America should have a Border Wall surrounding it's borders.

My argument is clear. My reasons for my opinion are clearly laid out in my opening round. Supporting arguments, opinions, and statements have been dispersed in the following rounds. I've carried my burden on why I feel America should have this wall. You haven't carried your burden in why you feel America shouldn't have this wall. You ask questions, questions that are common sense and/or don't carry the weight of your burden. Your opposition in this debate is weak and you carry your burden badly. I was hoping for a great opponent. I will be more careful in selecting the debate parameters for who can participate in the future. Why shouldn't this wall be built? I have given my reasons for why it should be built. The burden has shifted. Please quit asking 1000 questions and carry your burden. What are your reasons for why you accepted this debate and for why you are in opposition to my perspective. This is your burden now. I have carried my burden to your feet.
America should have a Border Wall surrounding it's borders.

that's just bad argumentation it's not about the money it's about morality. if that was true why did you present the benefits of the border wall in mula? by your logic you haven't made an argument either and you haven't answered my questions. the burden is on you. Who presented or challenged someone to debate you did. who took the aff. or the one who has the burden of proof? you did. so you haven't presented an argument I have. and if you still insist that I haven't then that makes us tie and the tie goes to me because somebody has to win and you have to prove that your case is above mine not tie.
America should have a Border Wall surrounding it's borders.

My opponent has no proper knowledge of how an economy works, nor even what supply and demand means in the context of a nation's economy. My opponent has no knowledge of the negative state our economy is in. My opponent falls off topic throughout most of his argument and does not put up any argument as to why a border wall should NOT be built, which is the position he has taken in this debate. And furthermore I grow tired of my opponents unintelligent questions that don't efficiently apply to this topic. For this I refute my opponent's argument entirely so far. Why should America NOT build a border wall? That is your burden as my opponent. I ask you to carry your burden properly, so we can have an intelligent debate. If you are not capable of doing so, then why have you accepted this debate? I can feel the passion in your words...the emotion. But you make no intelligent arguments for why an American border wall should NOT be built.
America should have a Border Wall surrounding it's borders.

you didn't even answer my relevant awesome analogy at the end. Such a shame. My opponent wants to build a big wall on the borders of america the only reason for this is that he wants to build a lot of jobs. And BTW you dismissed all my question under the category "commen sense" which means you don't have the answers or don't know the answers I think the latter is most likely. Furthermore why the military architect? 2. Your answers are vague and do not satisfy the burden of proof. which of my questions are irrational? and you won't answer them or can't answer them? my opponent then examines my steps to how it's negative and then only focuses on those points and completely ignores the conclusion but let's examine what he deduced "How it's negative 1. material that is needed to build a wall must also be transferred by trucks that spend gas and needs truck drivers to drive them and the material needs buying. 2.all of these people guards, maintenance, architectures, management, and carpenters, are needed to be paid and who besides illegal immigrants are willing to do this sort of job. the guards need training and the training need to be funded. ultimately everyone needs to be paid. conclusion: you said that jobs are desperately needed which implies that people need money and that people are being laid off from their jobs because there is no money. one final question where is the money to pay all these people going to come from? the gov't? that's a very nice way of saying the people isn't it. that seems a bit redundant they're going to pay themselves? the solution can't be throwing more money into the fire to stop the fire." 1.) What Con explains here is supply and demand, which stimulates the economy and helps it grow. 2.) Any job training that would need to be undertaken would only further stimulate a demand towards current training facilities, which stimulates the economy further. The budget for building a border wall and how to find this in the budget are not relevant to this debate in my opinion. This debate is about if America "should" or "shouldn't" build this wall. The funding of large construction projects and this one in particular could be a whole debate in itself. 1. it's supply and demand? really who is demanding these things except you? you have said people need jobs but not which people you have not proved that anyone needs jobs furthermore what is being supplied and who is demanding it? 2 WHAT DEMAND? you're saying there's a demand who's demanding it? you still haven't even proven that our economy needs stimulating everything is functioning properly as far as our economy goes. "The budget for building a border wall and how to find this in the budget are not relevant to this debate in my opinion. This debate is about if America "should" or "shouldn't" build this wall. The funding of large construction projects and this one in particular could be a whole debate in itself." I shouldn't buy a car cause I don't have enough money
America should have a Border Wall surrounding it's borders.

[1] I said... "Jobs... are desperately needed in America right now." Con says... "what is your basis for this contention?" Answer - Jobs are always needed Con, in any nation. It is one of the many ways a nation grows stronger. [2] Con says... "what material would you use for "the wall" and what kind of architecture......"border guards" do they need training?" 1.) Q = "what material would you use for "the wall" and what kind of architecture or architect would you use and how long would "the wall" be? furthermore how would you ship the "material" and where would it come from?" A = All of these questions would be left to the Military Architect for answering and have no relevance as to the importance of building a border wall in general. 2.) Q = "what people would apply for this "job?" and will you build said "facilities"? and do these people that "maintain" the facilities need learning experience? how about the "border guards" do they need training?" A = (Q1) Any people that qualify for the job. (Q2) The same forces that build the wall would build the facilities. (Q3) Some of the employees will need previous experience in a similar field and some would not, as applies to any job. (Q4) Depending on previous work experience , some of the border guards would need training and some would not. I would like to state that my opponent asks questions that are irrational in concluding the importance of building a border wall in general. Most of these questions are not relevant to the debate and most are answered through common sense. Do to time constraints.. I will not answer common sense questions after this round. That being said... I will move on. I do not have enough space to answer all 1001 of cons questions.. So I will argue with this as my final argument for this round... Con says.. "How it's negative 1. material that is needed to build a wall must also be transferred by trucks that spend gas and needs truck drivers to drive them and the material needs buying. 2.all of these people guards, maintenance, architectures, management, and carpenters, are needed to be paid and who besides illegal immigrants are willing to do this sort of job. the guards need training and the training need to be funded. ultimately everyone needs to be paid." 1.) What Con explains here is supply and demand, which stimulates the economy and helps it grow. 2.) Any job training that would need to be undertaken would only further stimulate a demand towards current training facilities, which stimulates the economy further. The budget for building a border wall and how to find this in the budget are not relevant to this debate in my opinion. This debate is about if America "should" or "shouldn't" build this wall. The funding of large construction projects and this one in particular could be a whole debate in itself. - Conclusion - My opponent makes a weak argument in this debateand asks far too many irrelevant common sense questions. - Justin Chains -
Resolved: That secondary education in America should value the fine arts over athletics.

yes both should be valued bacause the curriculum will not accept both of these subjects if one of the two or both is irrelevant in shaping the minds of the students. What i am arguing is that looking at the two subjects CAREFULLY, FINE ARTS IS A PACKAGE WHEREIN ATHLETICS IS INCLUDED. I said that it is ambiguous to give priority to both because as i have said they both complement each other to the extent that one is part of the other. But seeing athletics AS PART OF FINE ARTS, you are so stupid if you will not value fine arts the most rather than the other. I have no response to your arguments? Basically YES BECAUSE YOU ARE NT GIVING ME ANY ARGUMENTS AT ALL! I am not saying actually tat we value both what i am saying is that the reinforce each other because one is part of the other LOGICALLY SPEAKING!! To my opponent for yur information extra curricular is part of the curriculum being implemented in schools and giving importance to both is not the issue in this debate because it is both the subjects are important what i am arguing about is that one is better than the other so better to choose the better one and as i have said many times both complement to each other in the sense that ATHLETICS IS PART OF FINE ARTS .
Resolved: That secondary education in America should value the fine arts over athletics.

"its very shameful for my opponent to assert that i do want to prioritize both. what i am explaining is that these two subjects cannot be separated easily." "Implying this statement, it is therefore anbiguous to give priority to both" I'm pretty sure your second statement contradicts the first. " Look at the definition that i have gave regarding fine arts." First of all, this is completely irrelevant in this debate. Second, extend the argument about Wikipedia not being a reliable source. "Physically healthy because it is not only your mind that works when performing these kinds of activities but also your senses." My opponent does not show why fine arts is phsically healthy. He says it helps you mentally but not physically. "im so sorry because i cannot fully understand the arguments that my opponent is raisng." This is basically a forfeiture. He just explains that he has no response to my arguments. MY OPPONENT AGREES WITH MY BURDEN AND THUS I HAVE WON. HE SAYS THAT BOTH OF THESE TWO ACTIVITIES OUGHT BE VALUED THE SAME AND THUS I HAVE WON.
Resolved: That secondary education in America should value the fine arts over athletics.

its very shameful for my opponent to assert that i do want to prioritize both. what i am explaining is that these two subjects cannot be separated easily. Look at the definition that i have gave regarding fine arts. Physically healthy because it is not only your mind that works when performing these kinds of activities but also your senses.im so sorry because i cannot fully understand the arguments that my opponent is raisng.