FIFA should use modern technology in matches

Gentlemen from FIFA, it's time that instead of empty talk about "smart ball" and the introduction of goal-judge not only consider but also introduce modern technology in football! Goal that is not recognized by the English in the match with Germany is an example of a drastic error that simply should not happen in the world championship, especially because there is no way to prevent this kind of failure. Those who long remembered, among which I have and I will say that the history of Germans back what they took in 1966, the World Cup finals in London when the English, in overtime, led 3-2 Jeff Harsta phantom goal. The goal was awarded Bahramov former Soviet judge, or something like that, the more I do not remember, after whom the stadium in Baku (Azerbaijan) today bears his name. On the subject of that goal made a lot of analysis, studies, specialists were involved in all types of ballistic Descriptive Geometry to the doctor and has never been proved that the Harst really beat Tilkovskog at the 101. minute. If some of the goals and now leads controversy about this has no doubt. Goal was pure as tears, the ball was at least half a meter in the net, and immediately saw on TV and in the stadium, even the England coach Fabio Capello celebrated his fists clenched until his tie on his face was left shocked expression when he realized that Judges are seen naked ... I am sure that Sep Blatter, FIFA president, defended the right of judicial error, and that for the umpteenth time to reject a video camera as the ultimate arbiter, but football will survive and Blatter and Platini, who is also against the introduction of technology. For 5, 10 or 20 years in their place there will be younger people, with different views on this subject but if many sports have introduced "e-judge" why the football was no exception. The solution is relatively simple: four judges who now has a "responsible" task to show the replacement players and compensation time to sit with the TV signal receiver and the main judge of any contentious situations. Chief Judge should stop the game, go to the TV and went to see what the slow-motion clip is judged and what is not judged. The idea is that I am the judge recognized his mistake and correct it, or leave the decision which was made. No one needs to rule over him because the two criteria led to chaos. Electronics has long been present in American football, rugby, tie-break brought a revolution in tennis, basketball for years and titles decided by looking slow recording of the last rubble ... Why should football be untouchable? Why insist on "the right to make mistakes when there may be a" right of correction "? Aside $ 9 million by the English (maybe) lost (does not mean that won the match and was 2-2) fallout in the eighth round, but what about the nerves and feelings of the British fans? Players certainly have the feeling that something they denied, revoked, they are prevented in the reaction that might be for history, for a large shift ... Lord of FIFA, finger on the forehead. Time is definitely of electronics. Tevez first goal in the match Argentina-Mexico, made from thick offside, only confirmed my thesis on the need for electronics (and) in football. Fatal two errors in one day, in the eighth round of the World Championship! If the judges-much.