Debate.org should not demand your cell phone number to access certain features.

For maximum clarity, I will simply review the debate and show How I have won. So first to my own case, 1. Security- My opponent has conceded this point; vote for me. 2. The number is not used- My opponent claims I make no actual rebuttal here, but I urge to please review my statements. what I said is indeed a rebuttal, it covers my opponent's argument's and clarifies my point. However along with my opponent's insidious attack, he goes on to claim that I don't understand human nature. I would like to point out, that I am twenty years old, my opponent is fourteen; logically I must understand human nature more than my opponent as I have had longer to see it in action, second- I work in retail; trust me when I say I've seen the good and bad in humanity. Also my opponent's only real attack is still only an objection based on suspicion. 3. Limited usage is not the end of the world- My opponent doesn't cover the arguments I made, vote for me. Now I will proceed to my opponent's case 1. Some people may not have a cell phone- Once again, my opponent is avoiding the topic, those who have more get to do more. as awful as this might sound it's an undeniable truth in the society we live in. so why then,should those who do have cell phones (Which we've already determined is the more enumerated portion of society) lose out? this would violate the utilitarian ideology we've founded our society upon! 2. Having to borrow the cell phone of a friend/family member is an outrageous solution- I'm not going say anything here, instead I just ask you to review the debate and look at just what my opponent said in refutation towards my attack on him simply being suspicious. Vote for me here. 3. What will they do with my number- My opponent drops this point, he instead opts to talk about his own suspicions again; do not look to these vote for me. now that I've covered everything said thus far, I want to point out some things my opponent claims I've advocated in the course of this debate ========== -I should not care about users without cell phones. -That one argument means nothing because of one comparison you deem unreasonable. -Debate. org is not a place for talking about Debate. org. -I should trust Debate. org with a piece of my personal information without any knowledge of the site because. .. it's Debate. org? ========== I'm neither going to waste your, nor insult your intelligence pointing out the obvious flaws here, instead I offer you this as fodder in the fire that is the reasons you need to vote for me. and so in conclusion; my final words in this debate. You cannot allow my opponent to win this debate, he provides no logical backing on why he ought to win, he provides no empirical evidence to advocate his point, and the sum total of his logic re simply his own unfounded suspicions, and general distrust towards society. while on the flip side, I offer you logical, and sound reasoning; I've shown the usefulness of having members verify themselves with their phone. And so for all of these reasons, we can see no other vote in this round than for myself. (also, this system helps prevent vote-bombing since you need to verify by phone to vote. not a voting issue I know, as this is my last speech, but I thought I point that out. )