God is not a hero

I thank you for your response. After reading your rebuttal to my argument, it seems that your main contention and your rebuttal to my first argument(creating a meaningful existence) is that of the Problem of Evil(see:http://en.wikipedia.org...) in reference to the existence of famine in the world. You blame the existence of famine on God. I will prove this blame to be falsely seated. You also made a reference to the Holocaust(1939-1945), citing this as an argument that God is not the hero that I claim him to be. I will not, in this debate, argue against the Problem of Evil itself, but rather your argument based on the existence of famine. You seem to be misinformed on the causes of famine on earth. You seem to believe that famine is a thing which is entirely out of human control and is entirely in the control of God. This is a very false belief. It has been, and is even more so today, possible for the human race to completely eradicate famine. You will see, of course, that is typically triggered by drought or other natural causes, however you will also see that it is allowed and sustained by human action or inaction. I have cited two separate sources to support this statement: http://www.newint.org... & http://www.theworld.org... The sad fact of the earth is not that God(seemingly) does not intervene to stop the terrible things on earth, but is that the vast majority of these things are also caused by either human action or inaction. The holocaust did not occur because God did not prevent it, but rather because human beings caused it. Even your example of the thirteen-year-old boy found in Syria works against your own argument. Who is most at blame for this occurrence? You would say that it is God. I, however, would blame the men who tortured, castrated, and finally shot him. We too often find a scape goat in the form of God. I believe that the real solution to the world's problems would be a serious look in the mirror for the human race. Now, to answer your questions in regard to my second and third arguments, I am referring to God's sacrifice for us in the form of Jesus' death for our sins, and to God's love for the human race despite of our undeserving nature. In closing, I would like to respond to your final argument of "his(God's) children" being condemned to hell. The answer to this question is simply that God's children are not condemned to hell. God does not say that we are all children of God, but rather that those who have accepted the redemption and rebirth through Christ are his children. The others are condemned by their own actions and inaction's. ANYONE on earth can be saved from condemnation. The only thing they have to do is accept the gift from God. God will not save those who are unwilling to be saved. You seem to think of God as an unfeeling father who doesn't care at all for his own children and who has not and will not lift a finger to help them. After hearing the Gospel, how can you hold this view? God has done more for his creation then any father I have ever heard of. He has died for his children who have denied his existence, insulted, criticized, and disobeyed him innumerable times. He has given us all a way to be accepted back. He also puts up with us once we are back with him. I know from experience that we Christians(including and especially myself) would not be seen by anyone in their right mind as model children. So with this, I conclude my arguments for Round Two. I have both responded to all of my opponent's arguments and have defended the the negation of the topic statement: God is not a hero. I await your response.