Mistavega is the one epic omnipotent ruler of ownage.

I would like to remind my opponent that, ultimately, this debate will end up in the hands of the voters; they are the ones who will judge the winner of this debate. Discourtesy to them is not a wise strategy for winning, and will almost invariably lose conduct points for the rude debater. I reccomend, if my opponent truly suffers from this rare mental illness, that he employ a translator or editor to remove the foulness from his posts; perhaps his psychiatrist would be willing to aid him in this regard. I would note in passing that my opponent has given no evidence for his actually having this condition; that his posts contain insensitive and insulting remarks in contexts and applications that seem suspiciously normal to be produced by a mental disorder; and that even an actual case of coprolalia is insufficient grounds for uncalled for rudeness in a formal debate. _____________ REFUTATIONS: First, the context of his original remark was clearly referring to modern civilization. Following is the complete text of the post: "Ah you primitive mongrels amuse me with your prehistoric "board games" You need to join the prestiges ranks of the rest of modern civilization and play "video games" There in that civilization there is but one epic omnipotent ruler of ownage and his name is I, which is me, which is AWESOME. " He may have been referring to the subset of modern civilization known as the modern gaming community; however, such were not his exact words. There was no mistake in context here; if there was an "one epic omnipotent ruler of ownage" extant in the modern gaming community, he would by definition be extant in modern civilization, as the former is a subset of the latter. He then provides his own google search, attempting vainly to find a way to give his title some credibility. However, the search he provides is for 'epic omnipotent ruler of modern gaming civilization', without the quotation marks that tell Google to look for the entire phrase together. As a result, he finds not 25,00 as he incorrectly stated, but about 16,100 results. Only one of these mentions him, or his claimed title: the result for this very debate on Google. ONLY HERE, in the ENTIRE INTERNET, is my opponent's full title even listed. Searching for his exact title as I did, as a phrase, gets one result: this debate. Notice also that he has changed his title from the one mentioned in the original post and the resolution of the debate; from "epic omnipotent ruler of ownage" to "epic omnipotent ruler of modern gaming civilization. " This will not aid him, as even if he confirms that title, he will still not have affirmed the resolution. I ask him to please keep his arguments on topic. Last, my opponents handwaves my second argument, hoping it will go away. Yet, he clearly claimed to be "epic" and "omnipotent. " Were he truly epic, I contend that his record would reflect that state of awe-inspiring majesty. A record where he has not even attempted a debate after seven whole days of membership cannot be considered very heroic; zero wins and zero attempts is scarcely an impressively great record for any endeavor. On these counts then, he fails to be epic. Were he omnipotent, why has he not taken every available debate and won instantly? For a truly omnipotent being, winning debates should be as simple as factoring pi to the nth place. Were he omnipotent, why does he suffer from a mental disorder? Why is he making excuses for something it is easily within his power to control or eliminate? If he is truly omnipotent, why does he have such a hard time writing simple English? My opponent has given no indication of being either omnipotent or epic. These portions of his claim are clearly false. _______________ THIRD ARGUMENT: ". .. You can clearly see I was talking about being the epic omnipotent ruler of ownage of the modern gaming civilization, which is the modern gaming community. " My opponent claims to be a person of supreme importance in the modern gaming community. The term "ownage" seems to indicated a superior ability in winning video games; the terms "omnipotent" and "epic" indicate a recognized superiority over other gamers. To research these claims, I searched for video game champions, both international and American. Neither his real name, his assumed name "Mistavega," nor his title were anywhere to be found. Until he provides us with solid proof that he is in fact, the wold's supreme videogamer, I hold his claim to be negated on this front as well. ________________ CONCLUSION: We still await the first indication that he is of any importance in the gaming community. He has backed up none of his claims. Until he provides us with proof of his: a) Omnipotence b) Epic qualities (as opposed to coprolalia, which is a very UNepic quality) and c) Supremacy as a videogamer; I hold the resolution negated.