"There are no right or wrong answers in ethics"

The points you make based on cultural relativism may be right being that the examples I have provided are in fact targeted at specific cultures. However, the argument in whether there is a right or wrong in ethics is simply that, there was never a restriction put on the scale in which we can be right or wrong. Cultural relativism is absolutely necessary to understand any sort of grasp on any specific demographic. Planet earth is simply too large of a scale to argue any debate on unless that debate pertained to an atmospherical eco-system. It is necessary to break down what is being analyzed to some sort of smaller entity in order to examine it properly and make a decent argument. With that being said, in response to your counter-response, the ongoing practices of dolphin hunting in Denmark is not merely an argument of opinion, it"s an argument of national animal rights. Organizations like PETA from the United States and Whales.org, and organization to help protect whales worldwide located in the United Kingdom have all taken on roles to help protect the nearly extinct dolphins in Denmark. To also reiterate on your example of the gypsies; you are right. Gypsies do steal others things, where you are wrong is they do in fact know what they are doing is ethically wrong. It is also illegal. Illegal meaning their entire organized society has realized that what they are doing by stealing peoples belongings is ethically and morally wrong. Your argument states that every culture is different therefore there is no way to say what is right and what is wrong because each culture differs. This cannot hold true. While every culture is different, they each have their own right and wrong, you have even acknowledged this in your argument, so to say that there are ethically right and wrongs in each society but don"t correspond globally, they are automatically rendered invalid is bleak. In conclusion, you state in some of your last writings that if we narrow ethics down to country, "we open up to a majority of different beliefs on what is right or wrong". Admitting that there is in fact a right or wrong, they just simply clash when put on a global, much more diverse scale. You also go on to say, "we prove that there is no possible way for there to ever be a right or wrong in ethics and that instead there are things that are culturally acceptable in other places that are not as accepted in others". That is simply a white-wash of saying there is in fact a right or wrong is each specific culture, rendering your argument on the fact that there is no right or wrong in ethics regardless, invalid. When it comes down to the raw form of ethics, morals, and the grey area between right and wrong. To say there is no definitive answer to whether or not there is a right or wrong is simply not feasible, one has to look at ethics in each society to decipher what is right and what is wrong, and simply put, there are rights and wrongs in each society. Every society on this planet has some sort of an organized judicial system that has ethical right and wrongs, whether you agree with them is simply each person own opinion and choice, that doesn"t void the fact that there are morals in each society and ethically, there ultimately is a definitive right or wrong ethically throughout each society. It doesn"t matter if you"re talking about the Dolphin hunts on the Faroe Islands in Denmark, or the Kamikazes during World War II and the terrorists attacks on 9-11, if you ask anyone, regardless of culture or society, they either say it is wrong or it is right. There is no in-between opinion nor grey area. Rights and wrongs.