Jesus Rose From The Dead

https://imgflip.com... - Why did you just get someone else to debate for you? To commence my final argument, I wish to begin by thanking my opponent for providing his very own original argument to the debate, where he certainly didn't link to another video to debate me at all. I didn't think at the start of this debate that I would end up having to explain the fact that Jesus did in fact exist, and definitely didn't expect the contender to even question Jesus' existence, yet here we are. Proof of Jesus' existence: If you have ever studied history, you would know that generally, especially far in the past, that we are lucky to have one or two sources to confirm a fact. However, with Jesus' life, we have at least 5 major sources outside of the New Testament to confirm Christ's life here on earth, so let us begin: 1 - Josephus - The main writings of the 1st-century Romano-Jewish historian Flavius Josephus include references to Jesus and the origins of Christianity. (Books 18 and 20 refer to Jesus in detail) [1] 2 - Tacitus - The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Christ, his execution by Pontius Pilate and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work. [2] 3 - Mara Bar Serapion - Mara (son of Sarapion) was a Stoic philosopher from the Roman province of Syria. Sometime between 73 CE and the 3rd century, Mara wrote a letter to his son (also called Sarapion) which may contain an early non-Christian reference to the crucifixion of Jesus [3] 4 - Suetonius - The Roman historian Suetonius (c. 69 " after 122 CE) made references to early Christians and their leader in his work Lives of the Twelve Caesars (written 121 CE) [4] 5 - The Talmud - The Babylonian Talmud in a few cases includes references to Jesus using the terms "Yeshu", "Yeshu ha-Notzri", "ben Stada", and "ben Pandera" [5] I have already proven that Jesus is the Messiah, but just so that you don't go on another autistic rant, I will add a few more examples of the fact that Jesus was the Messiah. 1 - He would be struck in the head with a rod and spat on - Micah 5:1 Matthew 27:30 - 'They spat on him, and took the staff and struck him on the head again and again' (NIV) 2 - His hands and feet would be pierced (Prophesised hundreds of years before crucifixion was invented) - Psalms 22:16 John 20:25 - 'Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were' (NIV) 3 - Men would gamble for His clothing - Psalms 22:18 John 19:23 - 'Let's decide by lot (gambling) who will get it' (NIV) 4 - He would cry, "My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me!" - Psalms 22:1 Matthew 27:46 - 'Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?' (Which translates to -"My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?") (NIV) 5 - None of His bones would be broken - Psalms 34:20 John 19:34 - 'But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did not break his legs' (NIV) 6 - He would enter Jerusalem on a colt - Zechariah 9:9 Luke 19:32 'Why are you untying the colt? They replied: 'The Lord Needs It' (NIV) 7 - He would be executed with thieves - Isiah 53:12 Matthew 27:38 - 'Two rebels were crucified with him, one on his right, and one on his left' (NIV) I have now shown you 10 of the hundreds of pieces of evidence that Jesus was the Messiah Your claim that my whole argument is invalid due to the fact that I use different translations is just so that you can find a way to cower away from my argument and find puny excuses in order to make yourself look better. But it doesn't even invalidate my argument. If anything it unites the different translations on to one fact, that Jesus rose from the dead. And the fact that you think you have insulted me, demolished me and degraded me is simply your fantasy that you live in where you think that you having a Parkinson's breakdown is somehow degrading to me... (And by the way you should probably go back on your pills to stop that happening again, I see that you couldn't help yourself filling up a whole line full of 'Golly Gosh') https://imgflip.com... After three rounds now, you still haven't given your opinion of why you have faith that Jesus has not risen from the dead, nor given a reason or anything. The closest you ever came was when... actually, I can't think of when. All you have done is tried to steer the conversation away from the original point and into the area where you think you are stronger (Where you believe that Jesus wasn't the Messiah). And even then, you still aren't strong in those areas, because you obviously doubt Jesus' existence, which is something that anyone with any sort of intelligence (Even Richard Dawkins) will understand if they look at the facts. But you simply do not. Once again I have run the calculations and I can conclude that 0% of YOUR 'debate' was actually done by you. I think that a better use of your time than going to this website and writing meaningless arguments is to spend your time finding God and seeking out forgiveness and salvation of your sins from Jesus Christ, and ultimately spend more time with your wife and children. Oh, wait, you are probably void of either of those things. Now, I believe it is time for me to wrap up this debate. Thank You Backwardseden for providing an argument. Not a very good one, nor is it even YOUR argument, but at least there is an argument. And as for me, I have not felt insulted, destroyed or degraded by your intelligence, but quite the opposite. I have been uplifted. Now, in your final debate, I am going to support you because I am a loving guy, as Jesus wants me to be. Here is my advice: Take your medication so that you don't have any more Parkinson's outbreaks, stick to the argument, and explain to everyone why in the tomato spill (as a wise man also once said) you have the faith that Jesus did not rise from the dead. All this time you have been commenting on my intelligence, but you're so insecure you don't even wish to say what level of education you have completed, whereas I, accept the fact that I have not gone through my full education, due to the fact that I am only 16 years of age. To all those out there reading this debate and wondering who to vote for in this debate, think about who used the most reliable sources (Me: with just about any historical source you could name + The Holy Bible, where most evidence should come from when talking about this subject. Or Backwardseden: with 'TheAtheistExperience', a completely biased show hosted by a few virgins who have never even seen a woman in their life. That's how virgin they are.) Backwardseden's Rules Rewritten: dsjpk5 WILL be allowed to vote in the voting process. You cannot censor someone just because you know that they will have a different opinion. In conclusion, I believe that Jesus did rise from the dead as shown in my round 2 arguments and that Jesus was the Messiah, as shown in my round 3 and round 5 arguments. It is completely illogical to go against the facts and proclaim that Jesus didn't exist, therefore it is my job to destroy you, insult you and degrade you. You're a complete spogglepop if you believe that he didn't exist. A shnoodlebapper. A Degrisendher. A Madboyrazzer. The list goes on. Anyone can make up words mate, you aren't special. Actually, scrap that, you are very special. P.S. Notice how I haven't linked to any videos throughout the entire debate. That's because I don't need Arron Ra to help me in a debate. Next time, make up your own mind on what is real and what is not. May God watch over you and give you peace. #VoteJoel [1] - http://www.livius.org... [2] - http://www.livius.org... [3] - http://www.earlychristianwritings.com... [4] - https://www.britannica.com... [5] - https://en.wikipedia.org...