Apple [iOS] vs Android (Apple Pro, Android Con)

I would like to let my opponent know that I do not mind his late response, fore I have been busy as well. I'd also like to apologize for not putting up the website's address for my information. I will do that at the end of this debate. My opponent is correct. I have never used an IPhone. I have no intentions too. IOS is well known to be more faulty than the last. Hence if you pay attention IPhones become less and less popular as they come out. And gradually more breakable. That's why if any one has an IPhone now a days its usually one of the first 3. That's if they did their homework first. Section 1: Android uses Linux. Which I have to learn is usually one of the most secure PC systems. Having this, makes Androids more PC like, meaning they have more possibilities than most other phones. Androids can do force quit apps faster, it is common, yet not very common for an Android to not get a good, and fast internet connection. While Apple products are usually slow in general. Section 2: My opponent claims that IOS devices support widgets. I'd like to state that this brings up the question: How can a device support something that it has literally no access to? Section 3: From what I know, this "search engine" that you say helps you find things more easily, wasn't put into IOS devices until either 6 or 7. It is still invalid and it didn't make things any easier, but it didn't make them more difficult. This maybe because people haven't figured out how to work it yet, though it probably wouldn't help Apple make a better phone. Section 4: Yes. I'd also like to add that almost everything Apple does failed. The only truly good IPhone was the first one. This is because it worked as well as the now more popular, Microsoft phones. This is most likely because it was made by Steve Jobbs himself, having worked with Bill Gates prior to the formation of the Apple company. Section 5: It has been perfected. This is why the new Microsoft phone is so popular and has been making more money than its rivals. Everyone is happy with this capability. Section 6: Android is actually very compatible with computers. I'd like to point out that my opponent was not referring to the newer phones. And profiles really aren't that confusing, they all have different names and they all have different passwords. Section 7: That is what I'm referring to. Section 8: What I find ironic is that my opponent states that Apple uses cloud. What's ironic about it is that cloud is a Microsoft product. This makes me think that there is no originality to the IPhones. But then again, there never really was since the first one. Plus it still costs a lot of money to update an Apple product. Other phone products offer updates cheaply or free. Section 9: I'd like to bring up that Android actually still has the upper hand. There have been millions- billions of complaints of peoples' cats getting into their IPhone with the fingerprint scanner. So its not secure at all. And if that technology even existed, I'm sure they wouldn't put it in something as useless as an IPhone. I'd also like to bring up that the facial scanner has proven to be more secure than the fingerprint scanner. Because it scans you FACIAL FEATURES. Hairstyles don't matter. Section 10: As he brings this up. I was hypothetically correct. IOS shuts down almost every other hour. It's a faulty system. It always has been. Like I said before, IOS and Safari are the main reasons Apple is making less and less sales.