I Propose A More Logical Theoretical Cosmological Model Of The Macro Universe

In Conclusion:1. This model offers a physical solution to the accelerating recession problem.2. This model offers a physical solution for the source of the mass released in the Big Bang.3. This model offers a physical solution to the decaying matter problem.4. This model offers a physical solution to the black hole problem.5. This model offers a physical solution for the initial hyper-inflation.6. This model appears consistent with current particle research specific to the evolution of matter.7. This model offers a physical solution for the observed chemical/radiological composition of the visible/local universe.8. This model offers a possible physical solution for the WMAP cold spot.9. This model offers a possible physical solution for the Sloan, Pisces-Cetus, and CfA2 Great walls.10. This model provides for 100% recycling of all matter/energy in the visible/local universe.11. This model appears to violate no known laws of physics, or thermodynamics, including entropy build-up.12. This model requires no new laws to function.13. This model is well-supported by the accumulated observational evidence.14. This model appears to be superior to the current Standard Cosmological Model, and other popular models.15. It still leaves the question "What created space?" along with the solution to the 'Theory of Everything' to future theorists.Reasonable logic tells me that if a 'big bang' could, as theorized, simply materialize from 'nothing' ... or even 'something' ... with no reasonably explained origin (and sans God) then that same process could happen at any time, at any location. Such as two seconds from now inside the Moon's orbit, or at any other time in the history of the Hubble volume. That would appear, so far anyway, not to be the case.I fully understand my hypotheses regarding space and the universes beyond the Hubble volume fly in the face of popular beliefs, and I certainly do not deny that quantum physics allows for the possibility of alternate physics. However, I don't think space allows the 'macro' universe to function in a plethora, if not infinite number of ways, and it seems apparent that if there are indeed finite universes beyond ours, there must be an infinite number of them ... and they are remarkably quiescent.In any case, assuming the existence of space prior to the Big Bang, my model of the Hubble volume can stand alone.The following consists of excerpts of a small fraction of research subsequent to the creation of this model. Research that has confounded theorists relating to the evolution of our universe, in conflict with seemingly established theories emanating from the Standard Model, yet is entirely consistent with this model.On early star/galaxy formation inconsistent with accepted theories ... http://adsabs.harvard.edu... January 11, 2011 ... Abstract: We report evidence of a fully established galaxy cluster at z = 2.07, consisting of a ~20σ overdensity of red, compact spheroidal galaxies spatially coinciding with extended X-ray emission detected with XMM-Newton. These properties imply that this structure could be the most distant, mature cluster known to date and that X-ray luminous, elliptical-dominated clusters are already forming at substantially earlier epochs than previously known. Early clusters and 'astonishing luck' ... http://newswise.com... 1/11/2011 5:05 PM EST ... AzTEC 3 was one of the very first objects discovered by the team using the AzTEC camera and one of the first few AzTEC galaxies to be followed up with detailed scrutiny by other telescopes.What are the chances of detecting something as important and rare as one of the earliest-known protoclusters in the universe on the first try? As Wilson sees it, “We either got extremely lucky, or the universe biased our search and provided a signpost, like the tip of an iceberg sticking up out of the sea, that attracted our attention. Because they are monstrously huge and unusual, I think it may not be so crazy to think that galaxies like AzTEC 3 tend to exist in special places in the universe and we just don’t understand the signpost yet. That’s one thing we’ll definitely be looking to explain in the future.”"Most astronomers believe that such a massive cluster should not be mature until 2 to 3 billion years later."Ancient supermassive black holes inconsistent with accepted theories ...http://www.subarutelescope.org...;Japanese Researcher Finds Massive Black Hole 12.7 Billion Light-years AwayAstronomer Tomotsugu Goto from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has used the Subaru telescope to identify a distant quasar powered by a massive black hole. The quasar is almost 12.7 billion light-years away from Earth in the direction of the constellation Cancer the Crab. It is the most distant one ever found by a Japanese researcher and the eleventh most distant quasar currently known.The black hole is probably 2 billion times more massive than the Sun. So far, researchers have not yet proposed a theory of how such a massive black hole can form only 1 billion years after the birth of the universe.object Name: SDSSJ084119.52+290504.4http://www.msnbc.msn.com...A team of astronomers have found a colossal black hole so ancient, they're not sure how it had enough time to grow to its current size, about 10 billion times the mass of the sun."The universe was awfully young at the time this was formed," said astronomer Roger Romani, a Stanford University associate professor whose team found the object. "It's a bit of a challenge to understand how this black hole got enough mass to reach its size."The research appeared June 10 on the online version of Astrophysical Journal Letters .object Name: Q0906+6930Surprising find ... http://news.discovery.com... Wed Jan 12, 2011 05:30 PM ET ... The black hole inside a neighboring galaxy, known as M87, is obese and filled with the equivalent of 6.6 billion of our suns, according to new measurements. These supermassive black holes are relatively rare, scientists suspect, so it is surprising that such a behemoth lives relatively close by -- just 50 million light-years away. More on galaxy formation ... http://science.gaeatimes.com... Monday, January 10, 2011 ... "For more than two decades, the prevailing wisdom among astronomers has been that galaxies evolved hierarchically. Amazingly, this is contrary to hierarchical structure formation,” he said. http://science.gaeatimes.com... Monday, January 10, 2011 ... “Now, we have found a dwarf galaxy with no bulge at all, yet it has a supermassive black hole. This greatly strengthens the case for the black holes developing first, before the galaxy’s bulge is formed,” said Reines. Unexpected superclusters ... http://news.discovery.com... Oct 15, 2010 11:53 AM ET ... Astronomers on the hunt for the biggest, most distant gangs of galaxies have landed a prize catch, a behemoth of a cluster 800 trillion times more massive than the sun ferreted out by a new cosmic fishing net from when the universe was half its present age. Lack of 'smaller scale' homogeneity in the COBE early universe ... http://p-i-a.com... http://www.kqed.org... On Spin ...http://www.universetoday.com...“We think these monster black holes are spinning close to the limit set by Einstein’s theory of relatively, which means that they can drag material around them at close to the speed of light,” said Rodrigo Nemmen, a visiting graduate student at Penn State University.http://www.newscientist.com..."They found the innermost stable orbit around GRS 1915 is so close that the black hole must be spinning at nearly 1000 times per second - the fastest ever recorded."Note: If earth, using the approximate equatorial circumference of 40,000 kilometers, was rotating at even half that velocity, 500 rps, assuming sufficient gravity, the surface matter would be moving past a fixed point in space at 20 million kps, or 66 times c..So if this massive black hole spinning at 1,000 rps has volume, and a physical circumference no bigger than earth's, the surface matter is moving past a fixed point at 132 times the speed of light and it is not flying apart.On UHECR ...http://en.wikipedia.org...The source of such high energy particles has been a mystery for many years. AGN have been proposed as likely sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, and results from the Pierre Auger Observatory suggest that these objects may be their source. Black hole spin is a potentially effective agent to drive UHECR production, provided ions are suitably launched to circumvent limiting factors deep within the nucleus, notably curvature radiation and inelastic scattering with radiation from the inner disk.On the fabric of space ...http://arxiv.org... October 24, 2010 ... "We propose an alternative interpretation which takes into account the entropy and temperature intrinsic to the horizon of the universe due to the information holographically stored there. Dark energy is thereby obviated and the acceleration is due to an entropic force naturally arising from the information storage on the horizon surface screen. We consider an additional quantitative approach inspired by surface terms in general relativity and show that this leads to the entropic accelerating universe." "Thus, the acceleration of the universe simply arises as a natural consequence of the entropy on the horizon of the universe." - Paul H. Frampton, George Smoots