BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Glue dots are better than Liquid glue

Glue dots are way better than liquid glue! For 1, glue dots don't make the page curl when it dries, or the biggest mess in the world! They don't have to dry! You don't have to worry about them spilling. You can just stick them on and not get everything sticky! They come in all different sizes so you won't have to worry about putting to much glue on. Although some people say they are expensive, they are totally worth it! They stay on and won't unstick, (unless you get a very bad brand). Glue dots are way better than liquid glue!
Jesus was a sinner.

I am glad to see we agree if Jesus were to break the Old Law, it would be a sin. I say Jesus is not God, at least not until Jesus was dead due to Matthew 17:5, where God said Jesus was his son. I have not seen a verse where God himself claims to be Jesus, Jesus and others only make that claim. So, it would make sense to treat Jesus as a man until he died on the cross. So, as you said, it is up to God to forgive, not his son. If Jesus were above the Law then it would be pointless to call him sinless and lived a perfect life if he could do as he wished, Jesus could sleep with anyone he wanted; animals, women, or/and men and it would not be a sin. So, even if God were to permit Jesus to break the Old Law, technically, it would still be a sin just with no punishment. The law is supposed to help people live like God since He is perfect, so must be the Law. Why would God lay down Laws that he thinks should be broken time to time, and does not have to follow himself? It would not be just to hold humans to a higher standard than God. So, I disagree that God can break the Law if he wanted to. So, I do think Jesus did sin to spare that woman. No matter the circumstances, the old law did not pass until Jesus died. This is the last round, I do want to thank you for taking this debate and for being so polite, I know some hold religion to their personality, so they may feel they are personly being attacked when their faith is being questioned. So, I hope my text does not come off as insulting; I enjoy these conversations. Thanks, again.
Jesus was a sinner.

As my view is the traditional view, and there are no real places for me to start my argument from, I will focus on counter argument.My opponent is looking at but one of the facets of Jesus. The human facet. And before you stop reading, I am not saying that it would not be sin had Jesus broken the law of Moses. What I am saying is that Jesus, as God had the right to forgive the woman. As the Old Testament was based on a covenant between God and the Israeli people, justice was demanded as a result of God being the offended party. Thus, if God forgave the people, they would be innocent. This is seen in Numbers 16:41-50 as God stayed his hand from the remainder of the grumblers, showing his absolute sovereignty and power to forgive. I believe that the writing in the sand was either irrelivant or that he wrote Hosea 6:6 in the sand.
Jesus was a sinner.

Thank you for accepting! Let's get started. Before Jesus died on the cross, the Old Testament was still in place for all. Jesus was born and lived as a Jew; he would always be bounded to the Old Testament laws. Therefore, he would need to follow the Old Laws set in place by God through Moses, if Jesus were to disobey the Old Law, he would have sinned. That was the whole point of Jesus dying for all of us; he has to be clean from sin to take on all of his follower's crimes against God. Were Jesus" hands clean from all sin? In John 8:1-10, the town brought Jesus an adulteress, and he was told that the Law commanded them to stone the offender, Leviticus 20:10. Jesus then bent down to write in the sand; there was no other context other then he wrote. Standing back up he told the town, let the one without sin cast the first stone, which would be himself. Jesus then went back to writing in the sand until it was him and the sinner, he then tells the women that she was forgiven, and he would not punish her. Not stoning the woman was the moral thing to do, on Jesus" part. But doing something seen as moral can still be a sin. Sin is breaking the Laws given by God and stoning adulteresses was commanded by God. Following this logic, Jesus would have sinned for not stoning the woman. There is nothing in the Bible about writing in the sand giving the power to Jesus to disobey the Law. There are some counter arguments I tried to conjure, but they seem to fall through. The best one I have come up with is that the sand was to represent an override Law that would pass with time, as sand would. The text is too vague, Jesus could have been writing anything, even drawing velociraptors playing croquet on top of killer whales. But it would still be seen as a sin, God"s Law is to be seen as perfect, therefore not needing an override. If someone else did the same thing as Jesus, it would be a sin, and when it comes to God"s Laws, there are no exceptions.
Rap Battle 3

forgotten toys, you would know still better than being a mama's boy every night i tell her to blow and all i end up doing is enjoy homicidal, when all i see is a man with a pretty small wee. will the real MC please stand up hollaback at me with a "sup" one man's junk is another's treasure might be why you're arrivin' at desperate measures great wall of china? f*ck that shi*t in the end i still get more v@gina even blues clues knows its true every time i see you you're subdued excuse me for being rude but might i include why you're in a bad mood? could it possibly be due to this one small feud? or are you really all that crude? not posting tomorrow still better than you posting everyday like it matters to who talking about movies already? i don't need no excuse i just took her to the back until she cried "ready!" i aint gonna lie your hidden dragon is what it seems surprised that it hasnt lowered your self-esteem get at me son because you're no fun maybe its too early to declare who won all i know is that you've been outdone but the battle has just begun.
Rap Battle 3

Sit your A$$ down white boy I'm bored of you, like a long forgotten toy You're right, AFTER this you're gonna be homicidal Against a man who is on your level Right now your just a a weak street punk bad semen is right, yo mama should have aborted this piece of junk argentina? I don't know how that even relates to me You try to be my enemy? son I'm the Great Wall of China you can't even touch me Callin yourself a demon Your as intimidating as Barney on the weekends Talking about chinese songs with your ching chong ching You must see a lot of girls with Squinted eyes when they try to find your "thing" Not everyone is chinese, your just tiny dude Unlucky for you, you caught me in a bad mood It does matter if your suicidal sorrow... You could slit yourself right now so you have an excuse for not posting tomorrow Talking about songs ill talk about movies! I took yo mama to the back and things got heavy I ain't gonna start braggin but she was like a crouching tiger beggin for my hidden dragon!
Rap Battle 3

loserboi you are what you are suggest you back down or else there'll be scars having a mama going south still better than having one using her mouth doesn't matter if im suicidal because after this i'll be homicidal why bother try with biggie's left eye when all that happens will be me makin you cry an asian like you tryin' to rap? more like trying to be more than crap. son after i'm finished with you there aint gonna be an arena your @ss will be knocked back to argentina them cops gonna issue a subpoena f*ck that even your face cant be helped with neutrogena don't get me wrong im just another demon must have been my pops with his bad semin gonna need a theme song i just love ching chong singing songs just make sure you move along because the real king knows where he belongs! \
Rap Battle 3

Yo Sorrow your small like a mouse Call pest control get this garbage out the house Catching balls with what? your mouth? Like yo mama who makes a living going down south You don't got enough fire to light a birthday candle After this battle your name tells me your gonna be suicidal Your raps are weak, but nice try It's all lazy like biggie's left eye killin a white boy what a pain I won't even have the honor of saying good game I wanted Eminem but I guess I gotta settle for Cena Like a road team everyone booing your a$$ to get out of the arena This my show son, I'm staying on Top You better fold this match up before you flop Showing stress from what? from you? the only stress I got, is when I have lie to the cops on where I was when I murdered you Imma take a seat now, stepping on you made me tired don't go telling people you will win, it's not the first time someone said a white man was a liar I did as you said I shouted by doubts You can either embarrass yourself and keep spittin or do us all a favor by getting the F*k Out!
Rap Battle 3

by start the show i hope you know you're starting to make this feel real slow sorrow is in the house representing all that's rouse pitch your balls i'll catch them all my words are like fire spitting out; give me a shout if you have doubts otherwise sit down son, and get back down on your buns i hope you aren't serious when you say that your words mean anything to this day a white rapper hardly known- these lyrics the only thing i will own wherever you are please keep in mind, that in these battles i'm not very kind by being "best" you might have guessed; even the stress shows on your chest these words will put you to rest, so just take a seat and be my guest because the battle has just started and you'll be hopin' you departed
Rap Battle 3

This time I'll start the show Hopefully starting to feel the flow Loserbunny is back and strong It seriously has been way too long Doing another rap online My challenger better use his mind My lines are like a gun, cocked and loaded Press "accept" you see your chances of winning will have gradually faded An Asian rapper which is barely seen Have you stay glued to your computer screen I'm here to bring my challenger stress Hopefully whoever you are, you will have no regrets It's because I'm one of the best Just simply, better than all of the rest You might not believe me now, its something you got to learn Now I'll gladly turn the battle over to you, its your turn
This man should Face the death penalty

Thank you for the timely response. 1) I would ask that my opponent elaborate on this accusation. He claims that the man mentally killed, whereas i have not seen this. 2) I would ask for a source for this, to help me refute. But i am also assuming that these states are also pro death penalty. 3) This is fallacious for more than one reason: A) He was convicted of food tampering NOT sexual offenses. B) He was not proven to ejaculate on any of the gum except the one woman's. Innocent until proven guilty law. C)Definition of sexual offense: Sexual Offense: a forcible sex offense is "any sexual act directed against another person, forcibly and/or against that persons will; or not forcibly or against the person's will where the victim is incapable of giving consent," and includes forcible rape, forcible sodomy, sexual assault with an object, and forcible fondling. Non forcible sex offenses are acts of "unlawful, non forcible sexual intercourse," and include incest and statutory rape. There were no actions that were forced upon anybody. http://www.slc.edu... NEGATED.
This man should Face the death penalty

3) This is a sexual offense he ejaculated in gum and gave gum to multiple woman in my eyes it should be viewed as multiple sex offenses under the law 2) The state supreme courts of many states to find that the 8th amendment refers to denigration or humiliation of a person but not to the death penalty 1) It would not be not be hypocrisy to execute this man because he has not physically killed anyone, he has emotionally though.
This man should Face the death penalty

Let's begin. ======== Contentions: ======== 1. ) Hypocrisy: We condemn many each year for the act of killing other individuals, regardless of the reason's for these killings we put them to death anyways. Putting this man to death for the things he has done is no better than the lady pulling a gun out and shooting him on the spot. I must point out that she would surely be punished if that were the case. This man is not a grave threat to anyone, he is being convicted of food tampering, putting him to death is simply absurd. 2. ) The 8th amendment: Cruel and unusual punishment. Many interpret the death penalty as violating this amendment. With no actual reason for it, this seems out of the question. 3. ) Reasons for the death penalty: These are typically the only cases in which the death penalty are even considered: A: Murder B: Multiple sexual offenses C: Treason (Not so common anymore but still) Out of the countless crimes that are committed in America, only these three are punished by the death penalty. My opponent wishes a man convicted of food tampering should be put to death? My opponent must prove why this, over the thousands that do not, should be punished by the death penalty. I await my opponents case.
Capitalism with reasonable regulation

Hmm, I see you replaced Vladimir Lenin with Adolf Hitler. Capitalism" is, as the word self explains itself, the economic system of capital. Money. That's what it is about. As a consequence to the will of kings and nobles, exportation and importation of goods and services started to be applied. This is capitalism. Yes, so far so good. The aim of this system is to have profit. Initially, this is a great idea. Everyone should be able to work, produce and trade, and this would run like a charm forever. If only resources were infinite... Capitalism fails when little men earn without working and many men work without earning. This is a concept known as "surplus value", a concept created by the philosopher, economist, journalist and sociologist Karl Marx. As the bourgeoisie owns the means of production, they pay people to work for them, produce, sell the product and then hand them a small cut of what the good produced is worth. The capitalist, with that done, earns the biggest share of the profit and upholds his economic power over all others. This is the spark that lightened the flames of savagery. Powerful men do as they please and even become responsible for unhuman acts done to the workers in search for more power through money. This is incorrect, reading through "The wealth of Nations", you will never find anything about this, Adam Smith"s capitalism is based upon working, earning money, making stuff, and that"s it. This aspect follows capitalism yes, but it cannot have any direct correlation to capitalism, only to a small group of the population called "sociopaths", which cannot be eliminated by any economic system, I can directly link evil dictators and torture camps to communism, too much power, it gives too much power to the government, and "Absolute power corrupts absolutely". What good is to be a capitalist when you have no capital? That is when socialist ideals came. Henri de Saint-Simon, one of the founders of utopian socialism, wrote the first books about the subject[1], which would be later developed in a possible, applicable way by other intellectuals such as Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx. Karl Marx was an anarchist you know. Unfortunately I didn't have much time to elaborate this text, though I will do my best to give better arguments later on.
Capitalism with reasonable regulation

Let us commence. "Capitalism" is, as the word self explains itself, the economic system of capital. Money. That's what it is about. As a consequence to the will of kings and nobles, exportation and importation of goods and services started to be applied. This is capitalism. The aim of this system is to have profit. Initially, this is a great idea. Everyone should be able to work, produce and trade, and this would run like a charm forever. If only resources were infinite... Capitalism fails when little men earn without working and many men work without earning. This is a concept known as "surplus value", a concept created by the philosopher, economist, journalist and sociologist Karl Marx. As the bourgeoisie owns the means of production, they pay people to work for them, produce, sell the product and then hand them a small cut of what the good produced is worth. The capitalist, with that done, earns the biggest share of the profit and upholds his economic power over all others. This is the spark that lightened the flames of savagery. Powerful men do as they please, and even become responsible for unhuman acts done to the workers in search for more power through money. What good is to be a capitalist when you have no capital? That is when socialist ideals came. Henri de Saint-Simon, one of the founders of utopian socialism, wrote the first books about the subject[1], which would be later developed in a possible, applicable way by other intellectuals such as Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx. With socialism applied in the right way (that would mean not totally based and dependant on the soviet model, but putting a start to creativity in shaping the model), we can fix mistakes done in the past and promote the common good. Unfortunately I didn't have much time to elaborate this text, though I will do my best to give better arguments later on. [1] http://www.britannica.com...
Capitalism with reasonable regulation

Capitalism: A system where individuals are granted the right to own property, and are allowed to run their own trade. Regulation: A law preventing destructive business practices. Anarchism: A free for all nation where anyone can do whatever they want. Communism: The economic system based upon total and absolute loyalty to the evil dictator, I.e. a very controlling government. So here's my debate; capitalism is good as long as reasonable regulation are in place, such as the pure food and drug act, I will prove this in part by economic theory, and the bible, which will result in a side subject to combat this notion about Jesus being a commie, let's start with the commie thing: so what is these people think is that because Jesus said that parable about the workers getting played 100$ regardless of how long they worked, this is very easy to combat; it was a variable about minding your own business. Next off is the rest of the bible debate, so capitalism is composed of two aspects; the right to own property, and the right to run your own trade, if these were wrong, why then did God assign the children of Israel plots of land (I.e. private property). We may now move to the biblical thing of regulation, the entire book of Leviticus is government regulation. We will now move to the biblical reason why I do not agree with communism: last I checked God had a lot of problems with evil dictators, the pharaohs, king Saul, king darrius, or whatever it is that that guys name was who did the thing with the Jewish cups and the wine.
Every person in 1st world countries should abstain from eating meat.

Meat is detrimental to human health because of the cholesterol, too much fat, saturated fat, heterocyclic amines, and bacteria which release endotoxins. A plant based diet has fiber, antioxidants, and phytonutrients also know as phytochemicals. Cholesterol even in small amounts is linked to degenerative disease. Too much fat builds up as intramyocellular lipds which reduces insulin sensitivity. Saturated fat increased blood viscosity which makes your heart work harder. Heterocyclic amines are carcinogens. Bacteria endotoxins cause an immune system response that causes inflammation. Fiber helps with obesity and heart disease, antioxidants protect against cancer causing free radicals, phytonutrients have many beneficial affects. If you want the scientific version of what I said got to nutritionfacts.org. [4 If you want the street talk go to these youtubes of Healing Cancer from Inside Out [5] and Forks over Knives. [6] Thanks for the debate. 4. http://nutritionfacts.org... 5. 6.
Every person in 1st world countries should abstain from eating meat.

You sound like you know what you are talking about but what you just said was the dumbest thing i have ever read. I just got aids by reading it. Meat is a better source for energy, that is just a fact and im not talking about deer i am talking about every animal to ever live within the upcoming years. You had no arguments because i am the superior Legend and if you must know every single hunter in the world do not just kill the animal just because they use it for all of its resources and leave none to waist. "Less jobs producing unhealthy foods" this was stated by you and this statement is so wrong i had a sezier after reading it. "Unhealthy" please explain why meat in "unhealthy" without meat how will you survive in the upcoming years? if humans and other plant eating animals eat only plants the food will become more scarse but for meat, the animals keep breeding and reproducing so that makes it unlimited supply if wee keep out ways and dont over hunt.
Every person in 1st world countries should abstain from eating meat.

"First Without meat The energy levels of us humans will be relitivly low." Dr.DownsThis is a claim without a warrant, and thus a bare assertion. I have no idea why my opponent claims that humans would have low energy levels without meat. Thus, I have nothing to rebut. I will take one stab in the dark though and state that as per link [1] vegetarian diets are nutritionally adequate. "Now i do agree that everyone shout be eating some more greens but that is what the dank is for." Dr.DownsThe dank is for? What is that supposed to mean? Is this some sort of slang? I can only guess what my opponent meant by this statement."Without meat How will us humans grow and continue to thrive throughout the first world countries. The slaughter houses will be out of business witch means less jobs, no more hunting and every store that sells meat could be out of business because meat plays a huge role in today's society. Animals will over populate and and potential destroy the circular of life." Dr. DownsLess jobs producing unhealthy foods and damaging the environment. There are plenty of help wanted signs in my area. Sure they are low paying jobs, but they are jobs nevertheless. [2]" no more hunting" Dr. Downs"and every store that sells meat could be out of business because meat plays a huge role in today's society. " Dr. DownsHunting for sport is a separate issue. Plenty of hunters hunt for sport and not meat. The stores could switch merchandise. " Animals will over populate and and potential destroy the circular of life." Dr. DownsThey are trap, neuter, and release programs for deer. "The results of this research suggest that, under a narrow set of conditions, surgical sterilization can be effective in controlling the growth of an urban white-tailed deer population." [3]This is a good idea anyways because we don't want people firing off guns in suburban and urban areas aiming for deer. 2. http://www.thetelegram.com...3. http://portal.nifa.usda.gov...
Every person in 1st world countries should abstain from eating meat.

First Without meat The energy levels of us humans will be relitivly low. Now i do agree that everyone shout be eating some more greens but that is what the dank is for. Without meat How will us humans grow and continue to thrive throughout the first world countries. The slaughter houses will be out of business witch means less jobs, no more hunting and every store that sells meat could be out of business because meat plays a huge role in today's society. Animals will over populate and and potential destroy the circular of life.