Jesus isn't the son of God

I would like to begin by thanking my opponent for challenging me to this topic, and for being willing to shed light on the universe we live in one debate at a time. I often get asked about this topic (being God in general) and I have to steer the topic in the correct direction. If we wish to answer the question of whether Jesus is God's son, then we must examine not the Son himself, but instead the true nature of God the father. As such this debate is not about the nature of the Son, but about the nature of God the father and whether His nature makes a Son of God possible. Let me first present very important definitions. Because I am a fan of Merriam Webster, my definitions come from there unless otherwise specified. 1. God: "The Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe b Christian Science : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind 2 : a being or object believed to have more than natural attributes and powers and to require human worship; specifically : one controlling a particular aspect or part of reality 3 : a person or thing of supreme value" All underlined parts are the important ones.2. Christ: "the man who Christians believe to be the son of God and whose life, death, and resurrection as reported in the New Testament of the Bible are the basis of the Christian religion"3. Divinity: "the state of being a god : the state of being divine : a god or goddess : the formal study of religion, religious practices, and religious beliefs"Now that I have covered definitions let us begin opening arguments. I am doing this because I assume that is what my opponent did in his opening speech.1. God the father is omnipresent.This is the attribute that can be simply defined as "all-present". Or better yet, "all everywhere". Both of these imply that God's presence is felt everywhere. This does not mean His physical being spreads like a blanket through all things with being. Rather it means that God is able to insert His physical or metaphysical presence anywhere He so desires. This means that God, can be a part of anything He wishes without it being God. So if he moved his metaphysical presence into a toad, that toad would be highly beneath him, but it would become Godly in nature so long as God inhabited that toad.Bearing this in mind, God has the ability to have a son.2. God is omniscient and omnipotent.These two attributes are the most important to recognize. The first being "all-knowing", the second "all-powerful". The logic here follows itself when applied to the Son. What we must recognize is that God's infinite power and wisdom mean that He could easily find a way for some being to be His Divine Son, and also could make it possible that this Divine Being is the only one besides God and the Holy Ghost who possesses Divine attributes.More specifically under this argument I wish to address my opponent's argument. My opponent assumes that because God is one without a wife, then He cannot have sons. To which I reply false, because His all-powerful nature can allow Him to give birth without being a mother. More specifically God might have even birthed Jesus Christ metaphysically and that is how Jesus came into being. So my opponent's argument is not very logically sound when examined against God's nature. Also my opponent assumes that one son would mean a family of God's. But this is simply incorrect because by definition, only one God can be "all powerful". So that God is the Trinity of God the father, God the Son, and The Holy Ghost. These are all unique beings, but are connected together with a bond that makes them the same, at the same time. I don't expect my opponent to believe this, because it is difficult to comprehend. Actually it is completely possible to have this Trinity because God is all powerful. 3. The real nature of God the Son.Combining all that was previously said, the real nature of God the Son is a man who is Divine in nature and part of a Trinity that is made of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost. So it makes perfect sense that God can have a Son, but not have multiple worlds of Gods.With that said I rest my case and eagerly await my opponent's response.-42