There is no logical or proveable conclusion to the origins of the universe through religion.

I am willing to let this slide, but if my opponent forfeits any rounds in the debate, than I win automatically. Now to my arguments and rebuttals. My opponent references the big bang theorem as being no more accurate than any religion, and that matter could not have created itself. However, the big bang theorem has some truth and indirect evidence correlating to it. [1] The expansion of the universe from a single point of singularity can be traced to the movement of galaxies at seemingly faster than the speed of light, which shows that time-space is expanding. The cosmic background radiation also helps prove this concept. This evidence may not be truly conclusive, but no real evidence for the existence of a spiritual god governing the existence of the universe has been or will be found. There is no way to prove that god exists, has existed forever, and has no beginning. These are just mindless teachings instructed to us by the corrupt organization known as the church. I would also like to add that the concept of a god controlling the fate of the universe cannot be proved logically. The natural theology of the existence of god is flawed, as in the belief of a god is a style of life for us as humans, rather than a true and undeniable part of the universe's existence. [2] We believe in a god because we want to relate to a higher power that governs the universe, and that created us. We want to believe that we where created by someone else of a higher power, which is seen as gods being humanized in most religions. This is a natural tendency for some people psychologically, which is why the belief in a god is a style of life. It is not an inherent truth, but rather a figment of humanity. Many examples of this (Anthropomorphism) can be seen not only in Judeo-Christian religions, but in almost all religions. [3] Buddhism is one of the exceptions, where a non human force governs the universe, but this is still subject to the issue of being unable to be proven and how eternal life relates to natural human tendencies and instincts to live forever. Finally, I would like to say that my opponent's claim that, " Therefore it would be perfectly logical for something to always exist, and need no beginning or creator. " is contradicted by, "Now doesn't that make you feel silly saying, non sentient matter just appeared out of nowhere? " Con is stating that god has always existed, and was not created. Con then states that it is logical to believe that something needs no creator, which correlates to his first statement. However, con also states that it is illogical to believe that matter appeared in space without a creator. If god wasn't created, and it is logical to believe that god could exist without creation, than why is it illogical to believe that matter and the universe has existed without a creator, and from "out of nowhere"? This argument is similar to the argument in the comments that was posted, but I did not copy that argument. I have just used a similar argument structured differently, and relating to my opponents arguments. Sources: . https://en.wikipedia.org... [1]. https://en.wikipedia.org... [2]. https://en.wikipedia.org... [3]