Hinduism is the most moraly superior religion (official religions only) [SHARED BOP]

The ethical theory Pro supports is Consequentialism, where ends justify means and motivation justifies the acts. And those who support this theory generally hold that the aim all ethical system and moral obligation is to increase the well being and flourishing of nature and all conscious creatures. The problems this theory faces: If a person has good motivation for raping a girl or child, having in his mind the idea that this act will produce good in the end- then this rape cannot be condemned to be evil. Suppose in a situation raping and torturing hundred people somehow produce the flourishing of 10000 people (in a scenario where a billionaire promises to feed thousands of starving population in a poor nation by fulfilling his sadistic desire of watching those hundred girls getting tortured and raped) then this act is considered to be a good moral act. But those acts clearly seem to be evil in our inherent healthy moral conscience. Christian worldview of normative ethics is Deontology- which holds that moral values are right and wrong in itself independent of consequence. If one rapes and tortures which produces good life standards for many people, the act is still evil. The end doesn’t justify means. Moreover we don’t see good reason why we ought to achieve well being of creatures or nature flourishing to be the goal of moral duties. Scientists confidently say that the universe is destined to be doomed one day anyway. The world cannot go on forever but the universe will collapse at a moment completely, if not, then the age of earth itself is not so long. So why we ought to achieve flourishing of nature at all? If there is no personal One God, perfect creator who has an objective purpose for human life, then why shouldn’t we just act in our self-interest and create our own moral code and follow it denying an objective moral value and duty of life? In hindu pantheistic ethics we see no good reason to be obligated towards increasing nature flourishing which is one day destined to be doomed. Pro mentions that Christians have behaved violently and immorally. This is irrelevant because those violent hateful acts of those people do not correspond to Christian teaching, which holds objective value of humans who are made in the image of God. We have thus good reason to believe special value of human life superior to other creatures. Thus I think Christian ethics makes more sense of moral intuition and conscience as well as it describes the foundation of objective moral duties which are abiding on every human. Hindu consequentialism does not explain us why we ought to work honestly for the well being of nature when our own life span is so short and life ends at death. We see no obligation to work for the flourishing of earth, but if a personal God exists who has provided moral duties in our conscience that is grounded in his perfect Holy character then we ought to obey his commands and fulfill the purpose of human life. If consequentialism is true then many seemingly evil acts such as incest, pedophilia, zoophilia and even rape cannot be condemned as evil in themselves until they help in producing happiness, pleasure and well being of nature.