Pink Unicorn (Pro) Vs Flying Spaghetti Monster (Con)

Troll/Fun debate/semi serious ehhh whatever the hell we want it to beResolution - Which is more likely to existNote that we are dealing in odds of probability and chance. Meaning this is a weighted debate. Whichever one of us can show that their choice is *more likely* to exist, wins the debateUnicorn - a mythical animal typically represented as a horse with a single straight horn projecting from its forehead. [1]A unicorn is basically a horse with a horn on its head. Pink - http://www.neiu.edu... [2]So I am debating whether or not [2] + [1] = possibly existsC1) Horses With HornsAny type of horse with a horn could be considered a Unicorn. Note that we are debating which is more likely to exist, and it is my job to show that a horse with a horn is more likely to exist than a flying spaghetti monster. So we have to ask ourselves the question "can horses have horns"? Actually from archaeological digs "unicorn skeletons have been found". Whether or not this is an actual unicorn or just a horse with a horn is not relevant. Even if it was a horse with a horn by definition, this is labeled a unicorn. There was actually a skeleton of a horse with a horn found near the vicinity of Quedlinburg near Mount Zeunikenberg [3]. The actual statement claims this" What would seem to cast doubt on this matter is a fact reported by the illustrious Leibnitz in his Protogoea ; following the account of the famous Otto Guericke, he says that in 1663, someone pulled from a limestone quarry at Mount Zeunikenberg, in the territory of Quedlinberg, the skeleton of a terrestrial quadruped crouched on its hind parts, but on which the head was raised, and which sported on its forehead a horn of five ells, that is to say approximately ten feet in length and as thick as the leg of a man, but ending in a point. This skeleton was broken by the ignorance of the workers and pulled piece by piece from the ground; only the horn and the head remained whole, as well as some ribs, and the spine; these bones were brought to the abbess-princess of Quedlinberg. Mr. de Leibniz provides in this same work the image of this skeleton. He says on this subject that according to the report of Hyeronimus Lupus and Balthasar Tellez, Portuguese authors, a quadruped the size of a horse, on which the forehead is armed with a horn, exists in the land of the Abyssinians. See Liebnitz, Protogoea, pages 63 and 64 . In spite of all these authorities, it is maddening that the skeleton of which Leibniz speaks was not more carefully examined, and there is every reason to believe that that horn really belonged to a fish." [4]This report shows that there could actually have been unicorns that existed and has fossils to prove it, even removing the fact that this is one of many skeletons that could have been discovered the odds of them existing are higher than that of a spaghetti monster. C2) EvolutionThe process of evolution is a long and in depth process. Things like speciation and adaptation contribute to it. Think of it like thisLet's label species (a) horses. Lets actually name them poonhunters. So poonhunters or (a) are a specific type of horse breed that exist in desert climates. So now lets say (a) exist in environment (y). The entirety of (a) exists within (y). (Y) is any possible desert climate. (y) experiences some type of disaster, and (a) must now leave (y). (a) is now split into different regions around (y). Half of (a) now exists in (x) the other half exists in (z). These are two separate climates. Now at the initial split the poonhunter species is still the same initial species in itself. Now lets say environment (z) is more of a rocky terrain and one half of (a) is not use to this but still live here. Over thousands of years randoms variations in their species will occur to help them survive in that specific environment. So over the course of 100's and 1,000's of years the poonhunter species that live in (x) is still predominately the same as before but the half that exist in (z) has evolved into a different type of species due to adaption and environmental changes. They are now called poonslayers. Now lets say the half of (a) that exist in (z) have a rock they are allergic to, or get rashes from. They usually itch on their head, so to solve this problem they rub their head on other rocks to stop the itch. Over 1000's of years there head could become sharp and pointy and eventually shape up to become a horn. This is a possibility. Note almost anything is possible, and we see genetic mutations in evolution all the time that are creepy. So this is a viable possibility even if it may not be likely. The fact is though , that it is more likely that a flying spaghetti monster. C3) Mutations and Deformities. If a horse is born with a deformity such as a horn, it would still be labeled a unicorn. I mean again this is possible, there are women that are living with 3 boobs [6] ( This is censored but still only click if over 18 or at your own discretion), and even guys with 2 penises[7]. A deformity or mutation in a horse is much more likely and plausible that a flying spaghetti monster. Here are just some deformities and mutations in horses, so it is very likely they could accidentally grow a type of horn. C4) We can will stuff into existence. I mean this is a proven fact, you can sometimes alter time and space if you want something bad enough. This is even shown in the bible [8]I mean what would you rather will into existence. A spaghetti monster or a freaking unicorn. Reasons why people would will a unicorn into existence over a spaghetti monster. (a) Girls like horses (b) Guys like horses (c) Hot girls like horses (4) Transportation (5) Food (6) Production of horses/ (unicorns) and the money that comes for it (7) Girls like horses. These are just some obvious reasons why people would will horses and unicorns into existence over a spaghetti monster. Everyone likes them, you can use them for transportation, hot people love to ride them, and you can even eat them. ConclusionMy BOP is fulfilled. A unicorn is more likely to exist than a flying spaghetti monster. Sources[1] http://www.thefreedictionary.com...[2] http://www.neiu.edu...[3] http://www.johnkettler.com...[4] http://quod.lib.umich.edu...[5] http://evolution.berkeley.edu...[6] https://xenophilius.wordpress.com...[7] http://www.thedailybeast.com...[8] http://www.openbible.info...