Germs in the blood is a secondary phase of the disease process.

Pro needs to respond to this issue from round #1... Finally Pro must explain clearly his concept of " secondary phase of the disease process." --------------------- And from round #2 Pro still leaves these items on the table A. Pro must distinguish between "educated", "wise", "intelligent", and "comprehensive". B We must see results from treatment of "leaky gut". C. We must see "leaky gut " clinics with a host of "leaky gut "survivors. D Finally Pro must explain clearly his concept of " secondary phase of the disease process." -------------------------------- And from round #3 Koch won the Nobel. Pro calls him a fool. Pro needs to list other "fools" who won the Nobel. ----------------------- ---------------------- Quote from Pro- the medical system assumes that it is just one particular germ that is causing the problem. ---------------------- Let us look at the common cold. Using "germ theory", scientists have identified hundreds of germs as the primary cause ; Rhinovirus (1), Coronavirus (2) , RSV (3), parainfluenza.(4),. Thus pro's assertion is totally false... A myth. Also "Another myth says your diet is the cause. Don't pay attention to that tall tale. (5) --------------- -------------- Pro then asserts that " Con is trying to win the debate by using the tactic of avoidance. Con hopes that by avoiding certain weak aspects of the germ theory of disease that they can win the debate. Sorry Con. You can't win a debate by avoiding important issues." ------------------- It is obvious that pro is the guilty party here...to wit CON calls upon pro to answer theses items Pro needs to respond to this issue from round #1... Pro must explain clearly his concept of " secondary phase of the disease process." And from round #2 Pro still leaves these items on the table A. Pro must distinguish between "educated", "wise", "intelligent", and "comprehensive". B We must see results from treatment of "leaky gut". C. We must see "leaky gut " clinics with a host of "leaky gut "survivors. D Finally Pro must explain clearly his concept of " secondary phase of the disease process." And from round #3 Koch won the Nobel. Pro calls him a fool. Pro needs to list other "fools" who won the Nobel. CON has responded to every item put forth. It is pro that is avoiding the issues. -------------------------------. ------------------------------ Pro claims " The concept that only one particular germ is responsible for one particular disease is a big mistake which the medical fraternity tries to cover up constantly." -------------- CON has responded to this above regarding the common cold. Pro once again falls flat. ----------------- ---------------- Quote from Con- "These "leaky gut" theorists seem to avoid the scientists and go to the public with their "snake oil sales". Pro then proves CON's point by referencing MDPI. Here is an analysis of the source "The Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute has garnered a reputation for "churning out" journals, "many of them of mediocre quality"" (6) "In December 2011, the MDPI journal Life published Erik D. Andrulis' theoretical paper, Theory of the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life, aiming at presenting a framework to explain life. It attracted coverage by the popular science and technology magazines Ars Technica and Popular Science, which characterized it as "crazy"[7] and "hilarious".[8) (9) Therefore pro is citing what academia considers a traveling medicine show....all claims and no results. -------------------- -------------------- CON notes too that doctors recognize Enterobacterial Infections. "The most common test that is used to identify the cause of diarrhea is the stool test. Examining a stool sample under a microscope can help to rule out parasitic and protozoal infections. Routine stool cultures, however, cannot be used to identify any of the four types of E. coli that cause intestinal infections. ETEC, EPEC, and EIEC are unusual in the United States and can usually be identified only by specialists in research laboratories. Because of concern about EHEC outbreaks, however, most laboratories in the United States can now screen for O157:H7 with a test that identifies its characteristic toxin. All patients with bloody diarrhea should have a stool sample tested for E. coli O157:H7." (10) So when pro says " I have been to dozens of doctors over the years and none have ... checked my stools." CON questions where pro is going for medical treatment. I myself have had several stool samples examined where the symptoms indicate the need. ------------------ ------------------ CON calls upon pro yet again to A. respond to this issue from round #1... Pro must explain clearly his concept of " secondary phase of the disease process." B.. Pro must distinguish between "educated", "wise", "intelligent", and "comprehensive". C We must see results from treatment of "leaky gut". D. We must see "leaky gut " clinics with a host of "leaky gut "survivors. E. Pro must explain clearly his concept of " secondary phase of the disease process." F. Koch won the Nobel. Pro calls him a fool. Pro needs to list other "fools" who won the Nobel. ----------------------- ---------------------- Thus it is seen that CON has completely destroyed pro's argument, and CON did it without saying everyone else is wrong or that doctors are conspirators. Therefore CON's universe is much less "cluttered" than is pro's. Thus in the theory of the structure and content of theories, the germ theory, which includes a condition commonly misinterpreted as "leaky gut", must be taken as superior to the "leaky gut " theory . ***************************************************************** (1) https://www.webmd.com... (2 )https://www.webmd.com... (3) https://www.webmd.com... (4) https://www.webmd.com... (5) https://www.webmd.com... (6) Beall, Jeffrey (2017). "What I learned from predatory publishers". Biochemia Medica. 27 (2): 273"279. (7) Timmer, John. "How the craziest f#@!ing "theory of everything" got published and promoted". Ars Technica. Retrieved 17 January 2014. (8) J Nosowitz, Dan. "Hilarious "Theory of Everything" Paper Provokes Kerfuffle". Popular Science. Retrieved 17 January 2014. (9) https://en.wikipedia.org... (10) https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...