Excess cat populations should be eaten as dinner as opposed to euthanasia.

"There is a reason humans don't eat carnivores. The disease transmission risk is a lot higher. A carnivore is much more likely to carry plague, rabies and trichinosis than herbivore. Even in China, their health officials are cautioning against eating dogs." Con You have no external sources, just your own words. Any links that carnivores carry more disease? We eat fish which many of are carnivorous. I know a local restaurants near me used to sell shark. "Fresh Mako Shark $9.59 per pound" alwaysfreshfish.com "Then there would be taste. " Con Taste is subjective. The palete changes. "Our tastes can and do change over time for a variety of reasons. Do you now dislike something you used to love, or vice-versa? " theguardian.com "The size of a cat is also a problem. Most of them are only a pound of meat. It's kind of slim pickings for feeding your family of 4." Con Some people eat plenty of small animals right here in the USA. Quail, chickens, rabbits, etc. "If cats were good to eat, there wouldn't be strays all over the place. People will just about starve before they eat a cat." Con There is cultural norms. Lets face it people are like sheep. We just follow the person next to us. "Your idea is more obnoxious than Marie Antoinette. "Let them eat cat!" "Let them eat cake" was bad enough." Con I like the comparison. :) I may be wrong but Marie Antoinette was a disruption of wealth issue. Perhaps the real issue here isn't enough resources, but that an elite few have way too much. For example the Forks Over Knives documentary claims that the world's cattle alone could feed 8.7 billion people. Still feral cats do cause quite the problem as seen below. More importantly its fairly obvious our system of dealing with feral cats is not enough. Eating them would be one solution. "The impacts of feral or free-ranging human companion or domestic animals poses a challenge for contemporary wildlife management. The domestic cat is the best known of these animals for its impacts to wildlife. Feral cats are an exotic species in the United States. With numbers in the millions, these animals are recognized as one of the most widespread and serious threats to the health and integrity of native wildlife populations and natural ecosystems." dfg.ca.gov "According to a new study, the wild felines, which kill an estimated 75 million native animals per night, are responsible for the extinction of several species of mammals." huffingtonpost.com "But this year in China, more than 2 million dogs and cats will be condemned to a hellish life of abuse, neglect, and cruelty before being slaughtered and stripped of their skin for the Chinese fur industry, which sells a lot of its products right here in the United States and Canada. " peta.org So effectively you are saying the lives of these cats are more valuable that an entire species? We should just let the feral cats cause the extinction of species after species? "for the fur-trimmed jackets, gloves, and other items that may find their way onto store shelves this fall." peta.org We are already buying and wearing Fluffy as jackets and gloves. Why not take the extra step and eat fluffy? http://www.alwaysfreshfish.com... http://www.theguardian.com... http://www.forksoverknives.com... http://www.dfg.ca.gov... http://www.huffingtonpost.com...