LGBT Civil Rights

"The purpose of civil law is to restore someone as far as is possible to the position that they were in prior to their legal rights being breached" - No, this is false. The purpose of Western law especially in the United States of America is to uphold individuals natural rights. In the enlightened nations, governments rule via the social contract which can briefly be summed up like this; Humanity absent of government survived in a very brutish fashion, and people consent to being governed, also the only purpose of a government is to keep order, and preserve people's natural rights. (This is extremely simple) "In other words it"s to settle disputes and help the person who feels their rights were breached to be able to go back to their everyday life" - Yes, but their NATURAL rights. Not civil rights. Civil rights are things such as your right to a lawyer, which in the absence of a state is meaningless. Natural rights are things such as self ownership, with or without a state you have the right to self ownership. "How does this have to do with the LGBT? Till only recently the Government acknowledged (based on FALSE information, a person"s right to be a degenerate Human Being! I would say that a women who sleeps with men out of wedlock is such a degenerate .. yes?" - Sure, they're degenerates, but degeneracy does not violate natural law/property rights. As long as the "degenerates" are not hurting others, then their actions are completely justified, and no force used to stop such actions be justified. "Matthew 19:4-5 Jesus answered, "Have you not read that from the beginning the Creator "made them male and female" 5and said, "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh"?" - Ah, argumentum ad auctoritatem; aka appeal to authority, in this case a false/unproven authority. Bible verses carry about as much weight in a discussion as a piece of paper saying,"Unicorns are real, and they like potatoes" They are completely meaningless, and not an argument. All other bible quoting will be ignored; It is worthless. "All of these correctly define the LGBT lifestyle. From antiquity this conduct and behavior was shunned as a completely dishonorable. That is of Course till the corruption of the Government leadership has taken hold at all levels. Now we are a Country of immorally bankrupt citizens, who Murder Babies in the Womb, have women who according to the dictionary are little more than whores." - Doesn't matter, religious scripture is meaningless. "They cried about those poor raped women might having to HAVE the baby of the rapist ". Then once it got through they altered it to include the indiscriminate murder of babies, from promiscuous irresponsible women as a whole!At present They have Murdered by In 2014, unmarried women accounted for 85.5% of all abortions (CDC). Women in their 20s accounted for the majority of abortions in 2014 and had the highest abortion rates (CDC). In 2014, women who had not aborted in the past accounted for 55.1% of all abortions; women with one or two prior abortions accounted for 36.3%, and women with three or more prior abortions accounted for 8.6% (CDC)." - What does abortion have to do with LGBT rights? So, anyway "degenerates" are more likely to have abortions, so what? Someone that owns a firearm is more likely to commit a crime with a firearm, than someone who does not own one, does that make firearm owners immoral people? Of course not. They have not done anything wrong until they actually get an abortion! "First they came for the communists, and I didn"t speak out- because I was not a communist; Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out- because I was not a socialist; Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out- because I was not a trade unionists; Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out- because I was not a Jew; Then they came for me-and there was no one left to speak out for me. Now you want to give Civil Rights to people who are degenerates. Tell us where is there a Law that makes perversion normal?" - And Godwin's Law rears it's ugly head. Argumentum ad Hitlerum. Godwins Law states that any political discussion, especially online given enough time will eventually produce a comparison to Hitler or the Nazi party, and that is safe to assume that the person who made the comparison has already lost the debate. Comparing something to Hitler or the Nazis is a logical fallacy. It is not a valid argument. Also, the Nazi party wanted to infringe on the rights of Jews, and I wish to protect the natural rights of all humans. There is absolutely nothing wrong with degeneracy as long it does not violate others rights. "The facts are that no government can dictate morality! Because it is subject to deterioration on a whim of chance. Look where we were 20 years ago, and the decadence of today." - You're right, morality is objective and can only be obtained by logic and reason. However the purpose of government is to protect natural law/morality. Better yet, look at where we were several hundred years ago. Philosophers worked on universalizing natural law to apply to slaves as well, and to force government to uphold this natural law. "You know how you can tell a Nation on the way to total annihilation? Watch its people " down the tubes, slow but sure, each generation more bankrupt morally than the one previous? What does the News tell you? Your living on borrowed time. The future? There IS no future. Only the stupid and the Blind cannot see it coming." - I do agree, I believe governments ARE the biggest threat to humanity, and to natural law. The way I see it, either people must wake up and abolish government, or die. However, you are the one who wishes to violate natural law. "God has that authority and God says:" - Going to have to stop you there. God is an unproven/false authority. Invalid argument. Here are a few videos about natural law. It's mainly about property rights and the non-aggression principle, but they also touch on why the social contract is invalid, however the social contract for this discussion is not important. But if you don't want to see the logic behind natural law it can be summarized like this: You own yourself, and by extension you own the fruits of your labor, and the results of your actions. By this, it is immoral to violate these rights. This prohibits murder, rape, theft, and assault. Stefan Molyneux -A Proof of Property Rights : Shane Killian - Libertarianism and Property Rights from First Principles :