The Biblical God cannot be shown immoral

I strongly believe the God of the Bible is a moral God, and that the actions shown in the Bible do not indicate immorality. Many of the accusations commonly made commit the following fallacies: -Assuming that because it's in the Bible, it's God approved. In reality, the Bible frequently presents the flaws of its authors, including Moses, David, and the apostles. It mentions Moses' stubborn rebellion against God, refusing to trust God to work through him in Exodus 3, and how his disobedience ultimately kept him from entering the Promised Land. It mentions how David's adultery and consequent murder of a woman's husband was punished by God, he was not allowed to build God's temple and forced to flee from his own family members throughout his life. It mentions how the apostles bickered amongst themselves over who would be the greatest and lost faith that Jesus would be the Messiah after the crucifixion. In short, the Bible is no Quran, glorifying its human author(s), but openly admits their mistakes that God alone may be glorified, and mentions some cases as evidence of what not to do, or simply for historical detail. -Assuming that because two passages mention different details they are necessarily in contradiction. However, there would be no need for multiple Gospel accounts if the writers knew the exact same material and wrote the exact same accounts. Where the details are compatible and there is no reason to assume a contradiction, none should be assumed. It is no more a contradiction for two passages to mention varying details of the same event than for science papers to mention different levels of detail about a subject, or dictionaries to address different words. -Going by an English translation without considering the original text, the Hebrew and Greek original words which are translated into English. The Bible was originally authored in ancient Greek and Hebrew, which thanks to manuscripts like the Dead Sea Scrolls we can see for ourselves. The KJV was for centuries the best translation available, but was authored in old English in the 16th century, and differences arise between such ancient English and our modern version of it. One must account for the translation process. -Overlooking the context of a passage to cherrypick words that in the broader scope of the chapter or book make perfect sense. This is more understandable when the answer requires a holistic reading of the entire Bible than a single chapter, but even when the answer occurs within the chapter occurs too often. -Applying a broad definition to God based on popular perception of what God is like, rather than what the Bible says. For example, I would argue the Bible does not portray God as all-knowing, as He is portrayed Biblically as tricked and sabotaged by Satan in Matthew 13:28; having created things good, and having Satan mess things up behind His back. Similarly it is popular conception that people go to Heaven when they did, the Bible actually presents a concept of 'sheol' deep in the earth divided into two halves by a great gulf fixed where the dead go. (Luke 16:26) Likewise, it is popular conception that God oversees the Earth, when Satan is referred to as the ruler over both the earth (Matthew 4:9, Ephesians 6:12) and death (, the "god of this world." (2 Corinthians 4:4) I provide these in good faith, the burden of proof now rests with Con to show evidence that the Biblical God is indeed lacking in morality in light of how the Bible presents said God.