The Christian God Exists

Rebuttal: Fine-Tuning Argument: I'm not going to even argue against "Fine-Tuning" because frankly, I have no idea what the opposition's examples of "Fine-Tuning" means. Regardless of if it is valid or not, it doesn't prove the topic. Sure, an intelligent creator could have designed the world but by would it be the Christian God? How do you know it is not a malicious God? Or a committee of god's? Or even if it was a god? The last question raises the question of metaphysics. How do you know we don't live in a simulation? These "fundamental forces" could just be variables in a computer simulations designed by beings intelligent enough to create artificial consciousness. "Fine-Tuning" does not conclusively prove God's existence. (https://www.scientificamerican.com... for more) Free will defense: Your argument has three major flaws: 1) You first assume that we have free will. If everything has a cause, all our decisions have a cause. If we have free will, where did they come from? Are they random or are they caused by something? If they are caused, they are not free. 2) If God is omnipotent, he would know the future. He would know what you are going to do and therefore, you are unable to choose between alternatives. You have to choose whatever God knew that you were going to choose. If you didn't, God would not be omniscient. 3) You assume that it would be more benevolent to give free will then to withhold it. Even if the first or second flaws were not true, would it really be better for so much evil to exist with free will. Wouldn't it be better for God to give us the illusion of free will but make evil non-existent and unachievable. Finally, although not a flaw, wouldn't it be better for God to intervene or perform miracles to encourage people to choose good. Although free will would still happen (If you ignore the 1st and 2nd flaws), God could reduce the evil in the world by encouraging people to do good. "evil is a necessary by product of free will" God can do anything... He just makes evil NOT a necessary by product of free will. If he is unable, he is not omnipotent. Unmoved Mover (argument from motion): If God is the Unmoved Mover, why can't the universe be the Unmoved Mover? Or something else? Why does it have to be an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God? Arguments: Paradoxes: God's divine attributes raises a number of paradoxes that prove God's existence to be inconsistent. 1) If God is omnibenevolent, He cannot commit evil. If He can't commit evil, there is something he cannot do, even if he doesn't want to. Additionally, he would not know what it feels like to commit evil, therefore not being omniscient. 2) If God is omnipotent, he can create an unpredictable event. If God is omniscient, he can knows the future and knows that outcome of every event. This leads to the conclusion that God can make an unpredictable event but also predict the outcome of the event. A logical inconsistency. 3) If God is omnipotent, he can create something that its maker cannot move. If couldn't move the object he made, however, he would not be omnipotent. Natural Problem of Evil: A rebuttal and an argument, even if free will were possible, how does God explain the vast amount of natural evil which exists in the world. For example, multitudes of people across the world suffer because of cancer. God could prevent cancer without impeding free will. Cancer isn't the result of some decision someone with free will made. Although lifestyle choices may result in cancer, the existence of cancer was not created by a person with free will. It is a natural evil that God could prevent without allowing a greater or equal evil to exist. Natural evil exists so God does not. Thank you for reading.