I have Moral Authority

Why does MONSTER have to be bad? Monster: an imaginary creature that is typically large, ugly, and frightening. I don't see how it affects morality at all. Do you think all monsters are bad? What if there are good ones? You have shown another bias. No good sir, you have not proved my theorem wrong. for even if I did serve a monster, I would still do good. I use the word "correct", because any deity that would decide to kill us is pointless to think about. Do you think you're going worship a deity that kills humanity? If you knew of a deity that could destroy anything, shouldn't we find out why it hasn't? If the deity decides to kill us, I don't think I can do anything about it. O" god of the Earth how small your mind truly is. You say "Yikes" with such arrogance and you say you bear me with no "ill will"? Tell me why are running your victory lap? So many watchers want to you be right and yet so many need you to be wrong. I must prove you wrong not for my own pride, but for the love I have for Humanity, the same love that God has. You have tried to catch me with my guard down, but you have failed to realize that God is always protecting me. And now I will show you the words of God. If you know of an incorrect deity that kills Humanity, then why should I worship him? Would I not be able to worship after I"m dead? You imply God has killed 99% of all life on the Earth, then why did he save the other 1%? Should we make a choice to worship a deity that would end that 1%? And even if that deity had decided to do that, then shouldn"t we be nice to the rest of life in the meantime? Is Human not the first species to care about the other life that exists? Then why should you end Humanity? You can try to argue that Humanity kills more than it saves and thus should be ended. But God will save only those that choose to save the people who wants others to be saved. Either you agree or Humanity should not subscribe to Darwinism. You show your disposition towards Humanity like a conservative shows his towards Muslims. Why should I follow either logic if it only brings Humanity to its knees? Your imprisonment is near o" god of the Earth, tremble in fear that He is coming. Now send your champion against me, for I will defy him. >>>Would the love of a "correct" deity save humanity? That's a precarious presumption. My answer and theorem says yes, only love can be the reason to save so many. What you don"t understand is that love can be logical. I will define love as the wanting to save life instead of letting it die. And it is logical for Humanity to save itself under Darwinism. Would you let them die because you hate them so? >>> Would god be "correct" for making an exception for us? Who knows? Yes, God would be correct making an exception because we have the ability to care about not only ourselves but the other 1% that exists. God has made us in his image, with the capability of loving like he does. We are smart enough to create a symbiotic relationship with the rest of the life that exists. But first we need to lose our egos and come together as one species on this planet. Humanity must grow in the same way as an individual. You do not teach a toddler what you would teach an adult. Religion was instructing a child to why we should things. Now is the time for Humanity to act on reason and logic. But we do not need to forsake our religion to follow such a path. The only religion that is wrong is one that would lead to Human extinction. I have seen your face o" god of the Earth and will see mine soon enough. I will be known as the son of Mary. Before you accuse me of something foolish, why don"t you find out what my mother"s literal name is. My time has finally come, I will lead this world into salvation, based on the love of God. Make as many false innuendos and implications as much as you want o" god of the Earth. The only thing you can do is ramble on without proving my theorem wrong. My theorem is absolute truth. I have moral authority from my theorem which I call the love of God. You have argued for Humanity"s extinction and lost. Now prove my theorem wrong or go back into the hole of which you came.