Evolution is a superior explanation for the origin of man and the universe as compared to creationis

Inconceivable: it doesn't seem possible, it"s hard to imagine, or it can"t be true. It would have been inconceivable for early Homo sapiens to understand the world we live in today, but impossible no. You refer to experience and creation to be "power", it"s simply reality, and you can sit and stare and enjoy how the universe came into this unlikely existence by an unknown origin. But like I said before, science state we don't know yet. While creation simply state a divine being done it. The problem is, we don't know yet claim to have an answer, an answer needs an explanation, not bundling the existence of reality into a word and call it god. Don"t be arrogant and state you know the answer as say its god for you just stated the answer can"t be conceived. "We discovered a ball substance which made up all things, we later found that this was composed of protons, neutrons and electrons. We delved deeper still and found neutrinos and so forth, we are now looking for the hicks Bozon particle." Congratulations you finally understand that reality we live is made of physical fabric that is too small to touch. Humanity does not need to touch, for observing is how we discern the laws and theories of reality, it"s all about logical explanation that's open to change when new information is found reason why all are subject to testing and peer review. It seems you refer to god as everything encompassing this reality, that I"m guessing means creationists think the dimension is god. It is space, but it is still surrounds everything, which seems what your referring as being the existence of god. "Question, how do you account for the Vast worldwide experience of divine experiences in the world?" Define divine experience; I"m sure people have had some trippy experiences that could be perceived as divine, there evidence that when people gather together for the same reason to talk about something that makes them feel good, they will have a nero response from the brain similar to "tingles" is the brain releasing "feel good" brain chemicals. People who have an illness will feel amazing during this, but a couple of hours after their condition will return. Does it mean its god? No, it"s the brain, and in extension is shown the body itself has developed other self-healing mechanics throughout the body. Ok now back to a question for you, which you have stated before, "Theoretically if we had a computer which randomly entered in letters for eternity then we would get hamlet in some number of googolplexia...but we don't have a googolplexian amount of time. We have at most 4.54 billion years and while this may seem like a ridiculously long amount of time, it is simply not enough time for evolution on this scale to occur how Evos claim it occurred." What evidence can you provide to show life can"t develop in 4.54 Billion years? Given infinite time, and dimensions you would state it is impossible for a big bang to develop life? During infinite time when would a monkey, with a typewriter, type hamlet, referring to a never aging monkey, who does not get bored. With one monkey and typewriter in a series of infinite dimensions, which one of these monkeys will type out hamlet first? See in your previous statement you declared there wasn"t enough time, but when you have infinite amount of dimensions that can produce life if a big bang event happened how could you say, in a state of randomness, life couldn"t be formed early? See, given infinite time, mathematically it will happen but one does not know when. Another idea, what if life development fallows Moore"s Law. Wouldn"t the requirement to get to are current level of life reach quickly enough for you? There"s still no provided "proof" that states a divine being created the universe and in extension life. You only stated due to existence there must be a god, who therefor made life. I would also like to ask which Creationism do you believe, Young Earth creationism, Gap creationism, Progressive creationism, Intelligent Design, Theistic evolution. Another thing you once stated, "no, it wouldn't; because the divine being of the universe, God, created the earth not "conditions" on a planet and evolution...." So, you"re ignoring the forming of earth and how it came to be, just some magical being said "poof" earth? Even though evidence shows the development of earth? Reason why we can say earth is 4.54 billion years old. The planets around us are proof the different courses a planet can take, yet you claim a planet doesn't have conditions during formation that could limit life development? Yet mars who's so similar to earth that we could theoretically make it an earth planet by Terra-forming, didn't develop surface life? P.S: Origin of all living things dates around when earth was 3.5 billion years old, that's when life started on this planet. http://news.discovery.com...