Caitlyn Jenner is a He or an It

My thanks to Con for his fairness, and for the spirited competition. Rebuttals - Con alters the resolution when he states, "...we must determine, whether it is more appropriate and accurate..." The resolution is about objectivity and accuracy. Appropriateness is irrelevant to this debate. - Con states, "We rarely address somebody by what sex they are, because...we don't even know. We usually refer to them as whatever face they put on...", and, "We typically don't inspect people's crotch before addressing them, so referring to them by gender is more appropriate and common." Whether it is appropriate or common to assume the gender of a person by their appearance is a subject for another debate. As for the present debate, Con's statements reveal the subjectivity in such assumptions, "because honestly we don't even know". Con affirms that the use of gender-specific pronouns, when the sex is unknown, is subjective to the opinions of the observer and the feelings of the observed. Con's point is doubly irrelevant, because we do know Caitlyn Jenner's sex. The whole idea of Jenner being a "transgender woman" carries with it the revelation that Jenner "used to be" a man. - Con states, "Caitlyn, claims to be a woman." This does not prove objectivity or accuracy. I can claim to be a dolphin, but that does not make calling me a dolphin more objective or accurate than calling me a human. Con then cites an author who recommends subjective methods of choosing a pronoun, including asking which a person would "like" and judging the person's appearance. - Con states, "...we refer to people as the gender they look like or try to look like (again, doing a crotch check is rude), seeing as how, gender is the most common identifier of a person and not sex, it would be more accurate to call the person, by their gender." If the sex of the person is known, as is the case with Caitlyn Jenner, then it would be accurate and objective to call them by their sex. If the sex of the person is not known, then it would be more accurate and objective to use the neutral pronoun "it", or the gender-neutral version of "he". "Most common" does not equal "more accurate". - Con finishes R2 with some information on transgender people that is not relevant to the debate. A person identifying with the stereotypes of a certain gender by the age of three does not alter the person's biological structure, nor does the person's age remove the inherent subjectivity in "gender identity". The struggles a person faces because they identify with a different set of subjective stereotypes than the ones expected of them do not alter their biological and genetic makeup, and do not remove the inherent subjectivity of gender stereotypes. The hardships transgender people face are irrelevant to the debate. Not only does using a certain pronoun out of "respect" not affect its accuracy, it implies that it is being used subjectively. Conclusion This debate is not about what people "prefer to be called". This debate is not about what is appropriate or respectful. This debate is about accuracy and objectivity. As I have demonstrated, the most accurate and objective version of “she” is the biological one, and it does not describe Caitlyn Jenner with more accuracy or objectivity than “it” or the biological and gender-neutral versions of “he”. The resolution stands. Thank you, voters, for your time and consideration.