The user known as 'philosphical' is the same person as the user known as 'GhostWriter.'

========= 1. ORP Mafia ========= Con is completely LYING about everything that went on during that game. Fortunately, I have provided a link in the last round with a step-by-step analysis and direct quotes and links to the game. Moreover, Con continues to blatantly lie when he says he only called out 3/5 of my mafia within several pages on DP1 (Myself, KRF and Ghostwriter, of course). He indeed called out a 4th: Vi_Veri. In a recent forum, Phil says he called her out because she "defended me" though I have proven that she only made *2* posts prior to him calling her out, and she did not defend me in any one of those posts! The only thing she said about me was, "I wonder what Lwerd's economics major might develop into - who knows? I'm sure Nags will get us some investigative powers." Ladies and gentlemen, in no way, shape or form was that defending me so wtf is Phil talking about? After that, Vi said Phil was being paranoid... But so did Cody (on pg. 14), pcmbrown (on pg. 15), Bellum (on pg. 16), wonderwoman (on pg. 19)... Yet despite all of these people agreeing with me and even voting to lynch Phil, he claims that Vi saying "I wonder what Lwerd's major will do" is defending me and thus CONFIRMING to the point of him PROMISING that we're all mafia. Again, despite all of these people agreeing with me he says, "Guys please believe me... I can guarantee you that their role will show up as mafia." So as you can see, he used bad logic and I refuted all of it several times. He also knew who 4/5 of my mafia was randomly within a few pages on DP1 to the point that he could GUARANTEE all of our guilt, and he didn't know anyone else in any other mafia... despite the fact that my mafia didn't "agree with me" and several other people did. Mhm. Phil is a liar but for more links and evidence: http://www.debate.org... ======== 2. Facebook ======== GW lied about her name, age and photo while registering for DDO (to the point of getting a fake pic instead of having a non-photo avatar) and as a 40+ year old claims that she randomly decided to friend Destiny Gillies despite not knowing who this 15 y/o girl is and being at least 25 years older than her. Does that sound normal to you? Kim Cox has also written and commented on Destiny's pictures, saying things like she looked cute and pretty (Ghostwriter admits this -- we have screen shots of it anyway). Once again, this is not normal. Clearly they are related thus implying that GW is also related to Phil. Further, Phil has ignored my comment about them having OTHER friends in common too, such as Manola Cox. So how can Phil have "no idea" who Kim Cox is despite them having several mutual friends in common including 2 relatives?! Once again, this can not be chalked up to a coincidence. Ladies and gents, what are the odds that your RELATIVES are Facebook friends with random people from DDO? And what about the age gap? And the comments? Phil saying they live in the same town is yet another convenience. Further, there are more than 180,000 people in that town so that makes the odds even LOWER (than, say, a small town of 2,000 where everyone might know each other or have mutual friends). In short, the odds of this "coincidence" are SO LOW that it cannot be considered a coincidence! Some of their (Facebook) friends in common: Destiny Gillies and Manola Cox (relatives), Ashley Vogelpohl, Jovenae Eggen... The odds suggest this obviously CAN NOT BE A COINCIDENCE WHEN "GHOSTWRITER" KIM COX ONLY HAS (4 friends in common with Phil, including 2 definite relatives) 97 FRIENDS TO BEGIN WITH! Plus! Phil is once again lying about being from the same town as Kim. Both Kim and Manola Cox are from OREGON according to their Facebook (once again, I have screen shots of all this) so there goes his point about obviously having multiple friends being from the same area and all. Phil is from UT; these ladies are from OR. Clearly Phil knows Kim Cox in real life and borrowed her Facebook to pose as Ghostwriter. ================= Re: Back to Back Sign Ons ================= Phil says about both him and GW accepting their role claims back to back (with photo evidence), "These are literally right after Vi_veri sent out the Pm's!" Once again, this is a lie. Just scroll up to look at the photos and notice that this happened 2+ hours after Vi had sent out the roles. Moreover, here is even more photo evidence of me noticing back to back sign-ons of Phil and GW before this controversy even came to light: http://tinypic.com... . What incentive would I have to make this up? ============ Re: Mafia Cheating ============ Phil notes, "And as to the GW asking me to post saying I was online, contradicts your earlier argument that we are on at different times. If I was online at the same time then how could I have been her?" No. What I said was that this was (one time of many) when I noticed you both signing on back to back. She said, "Look - Phil's online" so I looked at your page, it said "Online 2 minutes ago" and then I refreshed; it said you were on. I went back to GW's page and it said she was "offline 1 minute ago." This happened multiple times over a few minute period. I have already provided photo proof of me noticing this, as well as the testimonies from several site users who noticed this happening at the same time (Askbob, Vi, etc.) -- this is when Vi asked that question to in which you mistakenly responded as GW -- and again we have all of those other members I mentioned (Nags, Rezz, Alex, DontBeRacist, xxdarkxx and Puck) who also agree that they have noticed strange patterns and coincidences. Vi believes as mod based on what happened to your role and character in the game that you and GW are the same person. The user known as Puck has also pointed out that since playing mafia, the only games that GW didn't play in were games that you were absent from as well. ======== Re: Mistake ======== Phil says, "When vi asked why GW didn't vote for herself, I gave her the obvious answer in misquotation." No. This is a lie. Look back at the link I provided in the last round; there was no QUOTATION anywhere. Phil wasn't doing any quoiting. He simply said, "Because I forfeited." He did not copy and paste anything to "misquote." ===== Re: S/G ===== In addition to the examples from last round, there's more. GW the brilliant paralegal doesn't understand compound words just as Phil doesn't (and other basic 1st grade grammar). For instance, GW says things like "dis-appointed" while Phil writes words like "dis-order." Proof: http://www.debate.org... / http://www.debate.org... . They both also write "scimmed" instead of skimmed, but who's counting? Plus, Phil says "a lot of people use phrases like 'kk' while typing" but do lawyers in their 40s? Or are they a bit more professional? Obviously the latter; plus we have screen shots of the real Kim Cox talking on Facebook in a much more professional and mature manner than Ghostwriter does here on DDO, or how Phil talked to Vi while pretending to be Kim. ======= Re: IP Info ======= Phil writes, " "My cell phone uses sprint service, and has nothing to do with cricket." Obviously he completely ignored my point from the last round: Cricket covers users with agreements from Metropcs and >>>> Sprint Nextel<<<< according to the Wiki ( http://en.wikipedia.org... ). Again, Phil has a Sprint Nextel. ======= Conclusion ======= There are FAR too many coincidences here. Any one of those can be seen as a coincidence at face value; however, when viewed at as a group the evidence becomes overwhelming (especially the Facebook!). Users in the other forums have all commented giving further reasoning and analysis but once again I'm out of characters. Please extend all of my arguments from the previous round.