Jesus cannot be divine for he himself has confessed he cannot tell the future

My challenger did not provide me with anything substantial in round one to argue against. Consequently, I will carry on here in round two with a solid line of reasoning which will help continue to establish as true the assertions set forth in my opening argument. In review, what I am primarily arguing for in this debate is that Christ is not divine; he cannot be, for in his own words he tells us openly that he cannot predict the future. And it is because of his inability to inherently reveal the future that Jesus is therefore Biblically eliminated from being God. Now some may vehemently disagree with this idea, but it is Biblically correct. For as was read in my opening argument we heard the true God, the Lord of hosts/God of Israel, telling us the one prerequisite one must innately possess in order to be God is that of being able to reveal the future. Let"s read about all this once again as seen in Isa 41:23 below: Isa 41:23 "Shew the things that are to come hereafter, THAT WE MAY KNOW THAT YE ARE GODS: yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together." (Capitalization emphasis mine) Now in the first round of this debate we also offered strong evidence that the God above who claims that he can tell the future "the Lord of hosts" is in reality the Father. We substantiated this assertion by going to the NT and comparing the above verse (Isa 41:23) to what Jesus stated concerning his Father as seen below in Acts 1:7: Act 1:7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, WHICH THE FATHER HATH PUT IN HIS OWN POWER. (Capitalization emphasis mine) As the readers can see, a simple comparison of both verses above yields a fair conclusion that the God who spoke in Isa 41:23 must be the Father. Yet some readers at this point may continue to deny that foretelling the future is what makes one truly divine, or proves that one is truly God. And because this doubt may still exist, we respond to it with the following commentary from well-known and respected Bible theologian Albert Barnes, who states the following about Isa 41:23: "That we may know that ye are gods - THE PREDICTION OF FUTURE EVENTS IS THE HIGHEST EVIDENCE OF OMNISCIENCE, AND OF COURSE OF DIVINITY. In this passage it is admitted that if they could do it, it would prove that they were worthy of adoration; and it is demanded, THAT IF THEY WERE GODS THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE SUCH A PREDICTION AS WOULD DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY WERE INVESTED WITH A DIVINE NATURE." (Albert Barnes' Notes on the Whole Bible) (Capitalization emphasis mine) Many Christians know that we indeed can be partakers of the divine nature (2Pt. 1:4), but the divinity spoken of by Mr. Barnes above must be an intrinsic type of divinity. For he tells us above that when one has the type of divine nature spoken of in Isa 41:23, one can inherently reveal the future and that being able to predict events to come is what truly defines one as God! Now for added emphasis to what Barnes just put forth above, I would like you to read another commentary on Isa 41:23, this one coming from yet another distinguished theologian named Matthew Henry, who tells us below that: "He has an infallible foresight. He would not only do this, but he did now, by his prophet, foretel it. Now the false gods not only could not do it, but they could not foresee it. (1.) HE CHALLENGES THEM TO PRODUCE ANY OF THEIR PRETENDED DEITIES, OR THEIR DIVINERS, that had given notice of this, or could (Isa 41:26): "Who has declared from the beginning any thing of this kind, or has told it before-time? Tell us if there be any that you know of, for we know not any; if there be any, we will say, He is righteous, he is true, his cause is just, his claims are proved, and he is in the right in demanding to be worshipped." This agrees with Isa 41:22, Isa 41:23. (2.) HE CHALLENGES TO HIMSELF THE SOLE HONOUR OF DOING IT AND FORETELLING IT (Isa 41:27) (Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary on the Bible) (Capitalization emphasis mine) After reading the above commentary we note that it plainly echoes much of what Barnes" statement put forth previously. Before moving on, let"s hear from just one more testimony concerning Isa 41:23 offered by the Seventh-day Adventist church"s commentary series on the Bible. We read in volume 4 of this set the following regarding Isa 41:23: "But only God can actually tell the future." (Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, vol. 4, p. 253) The above testimonies have provided us with some of the most damning evidence which utterly refutes the Trinity doctrine (and all other polytheistic dogmas). These very statements issued by these theologians above, along with Jesus' own words denying the ability to inherently predict future events, all reveal that Christ cannot be divine; he simply cannot be God as the Bible defines divinity! I would like to now however, take all that we have been learning of here to yet another level. We have already offered strong Biblical evidence that to be truly divine one must be inherently able to predict the future. But now, the same God who has laid out this clear principle for us to follow in Isa 41:23 has also told us unequivocally as well that THERE IS NO OTHER GOD IN THE UNIVERSE who can predict the future besides him. If this is indeed true, then this standard would then not only eliminate Christ from being God, but also the "holy spirit" who has also been placed on the same level as the Father! Let"s read below what the true God states about all this in Isa 46:9, 10: Isa 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and THERE IS NONE LIKE ME, Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: (Capitalization emphasis mine) In other words readers, what we have discovered up to this point is that not only has the Father put in his own power the ability to predict the future (Acts 1:7), but he additionally tells us above and in no uncertain terms that he is the ONLY God in the universe who can do so! The above declaration seen in Isa 46:9, 10 which is exclusive at its core, entirely eliminates the possibility of a so called "role play" (taken from Greek philosophy) among the alleged Trinity. Were there any such thing as a "role play" God would be lying above and God cannot lie (Heb. 6:8)! Now at this point since I received no real significant argument from my challenger in his last retort, I will end this round of the debate with a verse of which we have already read. The following, compared to the above verse will help us substantiate that the deity speaking in the above (Isa 46:9,10) is indeed the Father. Acts 1:7 states: Act 1:7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, WHICH THE FATHER HATH PUT IN HIS OWN POWER. (Capitalization emphasis mine) Regarding Acts 1:7 above Matthew Henry, whom we have already heard from, states the following: "The knowledge of it is reserved to God as his prerogative; IT IS WHAT THE FATHER HATH PUT IN HIS OWN POWER; it is hid with him. NONE BESIDES can reveal the times and seasons to come. Known unto God are all his works, but not to us, Act 15:18. IT IS IN HIS POWER, AND IN HIS ONLY, to declare the end from the beginning; AND BY THIS HE PROVES HIMSELF TO BE GOD, Isa 46:10. (Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary on the Bible) (Capitalization emphasis mine) Please read the above once again and take special note that "none besides" the Father can predict what is to come. In summary up to this second round, is what I am arguing for being strongly substantiated so far here? Is Jesus divine readers? Is he a God like the Father? Although many Christians claim that Christ is divine, we must concede that the evidence which has been offered here from the Bible totally challenges this very belief held by so many, it plainly reveals that he is not God!