Equal ism

Well, I challenge what you said in the comments. True, you got me there. I guess I should have been more specific. 1. I don't got you for I don't know where you are and cannot get you. 2. Yes, you should have been more specific. ... but we are not equal as in the way I mean to debate. Well, that was not specified. In the USA, for example, we strive to make everyone equal to another. I'm assuming by "we" you mean all Americans. Not everyone wants to make everyone equal to another. Rich people, for example, want the poor people to stay in the dirt because they don't want other rich noobs stepping on their turf. My argument is that, that is never going to happen because of our brains being different. You still didn't specify on what we are trying to be equal at. One person is going to get what they want, then the next person is going to want something different or better because we are humans. Just because we are humans (like I said before) does not mean we will not want different things as some of us will have similar opinions and still get the same things. So all in all, I agree with what you say... Vote Pro An example of what I'm trying to say is- a homosexual person will always fight for the same rights as a heterosexual person but if a Christian feels that is unnecessary, then that Christian will fight to keep the homosexual person from getting those rights because the Christians feels that it is wrong. Now, this is a fine example that would actually be an example to support your arguments (but not really) in which I will counter claim. 1. Not all homosexual "people" will always fight for the same rights as heterosexual "people." Homosexual people simply want to be happy with their partner. https://www.hrc.org... This is a list of rights that heterosexual couples have. Homosexual people don't necessarily garner these rights, depending on state laws, but that is no matter. All couples simply want the same thing: to be satisfied with the partner that they have chosen to be with. It's not about the rights, its about spending time with the ones that you love and the one that you love and care about. Homosexuals don't want to fight for equal rights as heterosexual couples. Heterosexual couples gets rights that won't have no matter much to homosexual couples. Homosexual couples just want to be happy. 2. Even if homosexual couples wants the same rights as heterosexual people such as, well all there pretty much to the benefits of married couples is taxes and money problems. This will only appeal to those who dislike the system of gay marriage, which you only pointed out from Christians that do not want gay marriage. But then again, not all homosexuals wants to be married together, some of them don't even want to be married but simply be together. That is possible and they don't have to get the rights to be married for they can just simply be together and be happy with each other. So, this is no matter to Christians even though they hate gay marriage. It is the homosexual couple's need to be married, if not at all but to simply be together. So, there you have it. Also, to simply prove that "ism" exists, here are some words that have "ism" in it which exist because that was part of the original argument: 1. communism 2. capitalism 3. anarchism 4. liberalism 5. socialism 6. fascism 7. Presbyterianism 8. Zoroastrianism And again, that is but a short list of "isms" that exist. Now for equality. Here is a list of stuff to show that "equal" exists as part of the original argument that Con has stated in R1 to show that "equal" exists: 1. You see this word right here: equal 2. = sign is an equal sign 3. What is 1+1? one plus one equals two. 4. Equal also exists in this sentence. There you have it, four simple cases of that "equal" does exist as per original argument by Con. Thank you for your time and this debate.