christianity vs science

Thanks for your response shipman. Trust me, I will enjoy refutting your argument. "when i refer to GOD, this also includes Jesus, and the holy spirit. explained by the trinity which i will get to later on"Yes I defined Christianity as such. "Big Bang" creating the universe.? please explain to me what is so logical of absolutely nothing creating everything.?" The Big Bang did not create the universe, it was the begining of the universe. The Big Bang has not been proven through logic, but with empirical evidence. The redshift of distant galaxies was amongst the first of such evidence as indicated by Hubble's Law. Under Hubble's Law, the universe is expanding with actual physical observation. From this we gather that distant objects have had to come from some point, and using the observable evidence it has been mathematically proven that the Universe was once a single point some 13.7 billion years ago. The mathematical equations build upon Einstein's general relativety. That is just 1 piece of evidence for the Big Bang. [1] Thus the Big Bang is not illogical since it has supporting evidence. Also note the first person to suggest the expansion of the universe theory was Georges Lemaitre, a Catholic priest. "the only Logical thing left that created the universe is GOD since he can be proven by a little word that he and his Holy word (BIBLE) are based on this word FAITH" This is classic example of argument from ignorance. If you say that the Big Bang is wrong and we don't know what caused the Universe to exist, it must be God you are essentially saying "I don't know, therefore I know" and makes no sense. The Bible is not evidence as it is just a book. You believe it to be true with faith, which means no matter how much the real world can contradict the bible, you will still believe it to be true."We can barley build a house in 7 days"See video #3"if they are forced to do something they will eventually resent the fact of whatever it is they are being forecd into in this case religion. " You are right. Unfortunately within the Christian context, one must be forced to believe in God to go to Heaven lest they go to Hell. Matthew 10:33 and Revelations 20:15 attest to this. This is essentially like a thief telling someone to give them their money or they will shoot them, but they still have a choice to give their money. In reality that is not a choice, that is duress. Except that eternity in fire and brimstone is worse than being shot."But, if everything we know has a beginning what or whom created god.?""The answer is Human Perception." You use the argument of causality to "disprove" the Big Bang yet fail to answer that question about God. You say it's "Human Perception" so that makes the Bible "Divine Perception" which again, is just a book and does not serve as evidence for God's existence anymore than the Harry Potter books serve as existence of Dumbeldore's wizardly skills."The serpent or the Devil "The Bible never says the serpent in Genesis is actually the Devil. [2]"Free will actually started with an evil angel named "Lucifer"" By "evil" you must mean immoral. God has absolute power and Lucifer rebelled against God. We praise those who rebel against tyrants, does that really mean Lucifer is evil? As far as I know, Satan has become a scapegoat for the Christian religion. Anything deemed immoral is blamed on "Satan" to escape collective conscience. Your argument for good and evil has not convinced me, or has been proven me wrong in any sense. Your intention was to prove my answers wrong but you have not. I am going to be as open-minded as possible and if you can attempt to prove me wrong you would have succeeded. Of course open-mindedness does not mean I will consider all assertions that are unfounded by evidence. You can prove my entire argument wrong with one simple thing: prove the existence of the Christian God with empirical evidence. On a side note, I will add some more things to reinforce my arguments and show you why your perception of science is incorrect. I have provided several videos for this that have been made by QualiaSoup and gives an interesting perspective. I will quote you again as to what you said"after you answer these questions i will begin to try and prove to you why your answers are wrong." This is what me and the judges are looking for. If you succeed, you win this debate and will certainly make me reconsider the Christian faith. This is a difficult task as you said yourself and so I applaud you for attempting to do so. Since your faith in God is so strong, you no doubt feel as if you know you have the truth, and if that is the case then you will inevitably prove my answers wrong. Truth prevails over falsehoods. Question is, will you be able to do so? You asked for criticism for your argument and I will gladly provide you with some that are constructive and not insulting. First I suggest you paragraph your argument to make it easier to read. It is frustrating to read a wall of text. Second I encourage spelling and grammar. Minor mistakes are fine but your argument is riddeled with them. Also the above rebuttals I have made ought to be considered. Sourceshttp://www.youtube.com...http://www.youtube.com...http://www.youtube.com...[1] Steven W. Hawking, George F.R. Ellis, "The Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and the Existence of Singularities in our Universe,"Astrophysical Journal, 152, (1968) pp. 25-36.[2] http://www.holeybooks.com...I look forward to your response! Cheers!