I can prove Ron Paul is better than your favorite candidate for president.

I am supporting Socialist Party USA candidate Brian P. Moore. Since you probably have never even heard of him, I will let you know where he stands on the issues. I'll start with the issue that is on all Americans minds, the Iraq War. His stance on this war is very clear. Get the troops out and bring them home. The first argument normally used is that there will be chaos if we leave, and many people will die. However Moore combats this issue by getting to the root cause of the conflicts, our allegiance with Israel, our occupation of Iraq/Afghanistan, and our "prisons" in Cuba and abroad. By calling for Israel to end their occupation of Palestine, and cutting Israel's aid as a condition of peace we will be eliminating a huge part of our foreign policy issues in the middle east. By removing our own occupying forces from Iraq/Afghanistan, and our "prisons" we will be eliminating many of the recruitment tools that terrorists are using. He stands alone on these issues. No other candidate would dare to speak the truth many Americans know. Another area I feel he differs with Paul is with regards to economics. He's calling for the withdrawal of the U.S. from NAFTA, CQAFTA, and FTAA. He also advocates worker and community ownership and control of corporations. Thus ending the ownership from controlling all the profits, and ensuring equal profit distribution. He is the only candidate to call for a $15 minimum wage. A wage which would enable all Americans to have a livable income. He supports full funding for arts and culture, universal education, single payer health system. In other words a socialized health care system. He recognizes the right of all people to high quality, low cost housing. He plans to fund these initiatives through reducing the military budget by 50%, and removing all troops from foreign duty stations. He calls for the same benefits for full and part-time workers, a 30 hour work week with six weeks annual paid vacation. Now we will look at the area of largest disagreement, immigration. Moore seeks to give equal rights to all immigrants and recognize their presence in large part is due to unfair U.S. economic policies toward their countries, war, famine, or bad human conditions. He even goes further by giving sanctuary to illegal immigrants in the U.S., full social services and impact immigration influx not with walls or guns or threats of imprisonment, but with fairer policies toward all other countries to enable their economies to thrive and expand as well. This is a better stance for America, and the world at large. A stance in fact shared by no other candidate. Finally I will point to the stances which I believe are needed immediately for this country. He calls for the abolishment of the CIA, NSA, Homeland Security Agency and all other covert warfare institutions. He calls for an international treaty outlawing all weapons of mass destruction. He calls for an end to U.S. arms sales in world. He also calls for a constitutional amendment requiring binding vote of people on all issues of war or military intervention. He realizes that we can no longer stretch our countries resources thin in pursuit of corporate profits, and to maintaining our status as a super-power. He recognizes our position as a super-power, and our ability to greatly influence the future of our country and the world. I feel strongly that Moore is a man ahead of his time. A man who sees better, and knows we can achieve it. Paul has many positive ideas as well, though he falls short in almost every category I have mentioned above. He is not willing to go all the way with his ideas. That is why I feel Moore would be a better president.