Evolutionism Vs. Creationism

Scientific facts are part of Mother Goose rhymes? You must believe that an 'egg fell off a wall' since you're so sure everything EXCEPT Evolution is a fairy tale. Creationism doesn't only rely on the Bible. But many of the happenings in the Bible have been proven true, along with the "In The Beginning..." the first chapter in it. There are many facts that prove Creationism's validity. I will not deny that things in biology change and there are some facts that lead to Evolution, but that doesn't mean Evolution itself is fact (you wouldn't say that these facts here automatically mean that Creationism is fact, either). See this site: http://creationdesign.org... And side music. Please listen!! Normally I don't like rap, but... You seem to be misunderstanding (intentionally) my words. I said 'This will NOT be about the Big Bang or Beginning of Life, although Creationism explains all that as one. And Evolution is hard to believe without knowing where it all started.' I smell criticism and irritation in you, and to me, the reason for that is you don't have a good foundation for your belief. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... Here's something to try to comprehend. What would MAKE you believe in God? There was an atheist on the internet who said "if I looked up right now and saw, written in the sky: 'HEY, ROGER! THIS IS GOD. I CERTAINLY DO EXIST!'" the immediateness would rule out a skywriter, and natural laws don't create specific, complex messages--only intelligent minds do that sort of thing. This why archaeologists know that the inscriptions they dig up from the ground were made by ancient humans, not natural forces. Well, it turns out that all life forms contain messages that are far more specified and complex than the messages the atheist above said. How much more? The simplest independent life we know about is the amoeba. Even Richard Dawkins admits that the amount of information in this one-celled life form has as much information in its DNA as 1,000 complete sets of an encyclopedia--that's 30 volumes x 1,000--in a cell that's much smaller than a grain of salt. Now, believing that 30,000 books came into existence from non-living chemicals by natural law without any intelligent intervention is like believing that an entire library resulted from an explosion in a printing shop! I don't have enough faith to believe that. Evidence for the complexity of DNA is positive empirically detectable, and it points to the work of an intelligent Creator. No natural force can create such a message, especially one that is 30,000 books long. French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal said something like this: God never performed a miracle to convince an atheist, because His ordinary works provide sufficient evidence. One of those ordinary works is DNA. Rebuttal of your video: First of all I think it's funny how the British narrator calls it evil-lution. "Evolution doesn't explain how life came to be or the start of the universe." Evolution doesn't work without an explanation of the beginning which is one reason the theory doesn't make sense to begin with. What was the first animal to ever live? The climate of the earth had to have been different a billion years ago, how did the creatures survive? There is so much chance and randomness in your theory and the evidence doesn't fill my satisfaction. (0:29) A supernatural Creator doesn't effect the evidence for Evolution? It doesn't effect the EVIDENCE, but say you believe in the Christian God--this contradicts Evolution because the Bible says God created people and animals 'of their own kind.' It doesn't work to believe in a God AND evolution. A theory DOES NOT mean a fact. Just a 'body of well-substantiated facts.' The problem is, Creationists and Evolutionists both say that they have the best facts therefore each thinks theirs is a theory (body of proven and good facts), and this leads to the issue of whether they are both theories or not. Let's NOT get into that. Focus on just the evidence itself. (1:37) Selective Breeding has many problems. Take the dog experiment going on, e. g., and you will find that your type of breeding causes deceases and rare disabilities because of the genes, so how did all these species change yet there were no gene problems? Each specie is unique no matter how similar, including apes and humans. Dogs bred artificially have problems--so imagine the problems with natural breeding into new species. How does each specie know who/what to breed with to create an entire new offspring of a new specie? Mutations=changes within a genetic variation within a population. Think about those last three words. And again, deceases happen, and one thing's DNA is impossible to be shared with another. Has natural "genetic drift" been seen in ANY WAY to happen? I imagine you saying 'no because it happens over millions of years and takes time,' well soon there will be another 1,000 years gone by. What's that you say? Still no proof? (4:10) "it's not pure accident that all these things happen." This is a lie because it's NOT THAT SIMPLE. According to doing science and math Evolution is improbable (see below). (6:27) What period of time is given for all this breeding, mutations, and selection to happen? There are 1,051,200,000,000,000 seconds in two billion years and there are 1,000,000,000,000,000 neurological connections. This means, for evolution to happen, there had to have been 1 fully perfected connection every second, consistently, for two billion years, and to me, that's FAST. To add onto that, the connections have to actually WORK, on the animals, and they would have to happen completely naturally too. (7:06) If the modern-day apes didn't evolve into humans, what ARE the modern-day apes' common ancestors? And at 10minutes is where I stopped watching because Evolution IS NOT a fact even though many lying, simpletons say it is! The evidence supporting Evolution may be facts, but that doesn't make Evolution itself a fact! There are many contradictions with your theory and I have just named many. This video also misinterpreted the way the public thinks evolution is. Creationists aren't stupid just because we don't believe in Evolution. On the contrary: most of the smartest scientists declared that there must be an Creator. Like in "God's Not Dead" movie, Stephen Hawkings says it is possible for something to form out of nothing. A great quote by John Lennox says truthfully that "Nonsense remains nonsense even when spoken by world-famous scientists." One thing strange and thought-to-be unrealistic by people (and you), in the Bible (which Creationism uses) are the miracles. Miracles happen around us nowadays, too, you know. And if you don't believe in miracles then you must also believe (yet AGAIN) that it all happens by chance. Science is explainable but randomness is not. Creationism is persecuted in a lot of ways: most atheists and democrats look down upon Creationists, devaluing us in life; Creationists are talked about with hatred and annoying sarcasm; your profile even admits that atheists should try to fight/bring down theists. But why? There is no less amount of fantasy or faith in believing in the Theory of Evolution. If you are willing to face REALITY, and REAL science (not just Evolutionist science) and stop claiming there's no evidence for Creationism and are willing to look at the evidence with an open mind...it works both ways and you can be a nonprophet if you want but I'm going to keep spreading the truth.