God is ONE, not a trinity as per the Hebrew Bible

Isaiah 9:6 The whole passage is in the past tense: יֻלַּד Sons were also born יֻלַּד to Shem, whose older brother was Japheth; Shem was the ancestor of all the sons of Eber. Yet again there was war at Gath, where there was a man of great stature, who had six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot, twenty-four in number; and he also was born יֻלַּד to the giant. And unto Eber were born יֻלַּד two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother's name was Joktan. Read in context, this passage has nothing to do with Jesus. Look at Rezin in verse 10! Isaiah 714 4 Therefore the Lord himself will give you[c] a sign: The virgin[d] will conceive and give birth to a son, and[e] will call him Immanuel.[f] 15 He will be eating curds and honey when he knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, 16 for before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, the land of the two kings you dread will be laid waste. Before That child from that (THE) specific women (not virgin) grows old, the two Kings (Syria and Israel) will be laid waste. Sorry and what kind of sign for Ahab would that be. Behold! a child will be born in 700 years ! Isaiah 40 and Psalm 102. Those are not prophecies. Timothy 3:16 New Testament is irrelevant for this debate. Hosea 1:7 God will save them, as it is written, some trust in horses, others in chariots but we will trust in the Name of the L-rd! (not Jesus) I also have no idea why you aren't letting me use the New Testament. For it is written, Psalms 12:6 ... the words of the Lord are flawless, like silver refined in a furnace of clay, purified seven times. This is the reason. To determine if the NT is inspires, you need to make sure it does not contradict the Hebrew Bible. If it contradict the Hebrew Bible, then it is not inspired. Jesus claimed to be god and it would be easy to prove from the New Testament. Nevertheless, if the new testament is not inspired, using it would be wrong. For example, if you do a debate with a mormon, if you allow to have his book as inspired, then he will show how right he is according to his book, even if it is not found in the Bible. "the words of the Lord are flawless, like silver refined in a furnace of clay, purified seven times." What words? The Hebrew Bible, the Catholic Bible, the Protestant, the book of mormons? The Hebrew Bible is the one they all agree. If the other contradict that one, then it is not inspired. Genesis 6:3 No, it says "My Spirit", the word "My" implies it is His Spirit If you say to me "Me head hearts". I will not imaging a second person's head! Job 33:4 Well, if I say "Your mind invented this machine" Your mind must be someone else than you.... My opponent will have to prove reasonably that G-d is a trinity I don't think you can disprove the trinity. Every time the word "YVHV" appears, the trinitarian will convert it to "a group of three gods (Jesus/HS/father)" in their head. Let's look at the Shema Listen, Israel: The group of three gods (Jesus/HS/father) our God, the group of three gods (Jesus/HS/father) is One. Even it it makes no sense, you cannot always disprove those non-sense. Common sense is not that common.