The Bible Is Repulsive

The basic contention of my opponent is that the bible advocates the death penalty for certain crimes, and therefore it is repulsive. This is both factually wrong and illogical.Let me first define repulsive: "Arousing intense distaste or disgust."For all Bible translations, I shall be using the King James bible. If any other bible is requested, please state its name and I will be happy to use that translation instead. Remember that we're not arguing about whether the Bible is true. We are simply questioning whether it is repulsive.The FactsJesus said "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her" (John 8:7). In context - a girl had just been caught in the act of adultery, and by way of test, the teachers of the law had put a stone in Jesus' hand. But Jesus did not stone the girl. He told the teachers, with these words, that God is the judge of crimes, including adultery, and that God alone determines guilt and punishment.So - should we put to death people who sin? NO! Jesus specifically commanded us not to. Jesus goes on to tell us that just as man must learn to forgive, so does God forgive (assuming you believe Jesus was God incarnate), by telling the woman "Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more" after all of the others had left.So perhaps we should judge them. Perhaps we should stick them up at the front of the church, and shout out "This man worked on the Sabbath - condemn him!" Well... no. Read Matthew 7:1-5:"Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye."So pretty much, the bible tells us to leave God's law to God, and man's law to man. Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and render unto God what is God's. Those who live by the sword die by the sword. Peace is the way, the truth and the life. Love your neighbour as yourself, even if they are sinners, for it is not the healthy who need a doctor (as opposed to executor), but the sick. This is the word of God.The LogicTake a look at this premise and assume it is true: "The bible advocates the death penalty for certain crimes." How does it logically follow from that that the bible is repulsive? There's a missing premise here. Something like "All books that advocate the death penalty for certain crimes are repulsive." Without that hidden premise, the conclusion does not follow.However, the problem is that the second premise cannot be logically made. Nothing is objectively repulsive (as "all" would indicate) because repulsion is a moral judgement, and morality is subjective. Let me prove that for you. The only way to test the validity of a fact is to exclude the alternative. So for example, is this a bay? Well, first we need to check that it's not a lake. Is the death penalty repulsive? Well, first we need to check whether it isn't. But the second example inevitably only begs the question. So you can't make a subjective judgement objective like my opponent, by implication, has attempted.My opponent has made a long argument and researched the bible throughly, and I commend him for that. However, he has missed what I believe to be the Bible's most important rule, and his argument doesn't actually make any sense when closely examined. I look forward to the second and final round!