A ban on sex between men should be introduced in order to help prevent the spread of AIDS

Wow...I move on to my opponent's case (Really Eggleston? Really?) and will reestablish my own (as well as my conclusion if there is room). As per my opponent's rebuttal concerning my case: CONCERNING CONTENTION ONE- 1) So we should ban sex with monkeys as well. Simply because someone bummed a monkey (which is under current speculation regarding the SIV and HIV relation) does not mean that we should consider my contention any less valid. It still stands that, while the origination of HIV/AIDS is unknown and is currently believed to have come from apes, A majority of the world who is living with AIDS is straight. Furthermore, they are found in Sub Saharan Africa. both these points stand. 2) Moot. Simply because there is a lack of condoms in Africa we should not assume there is any correlation to the resolution and why homosexual sex should be banned. 3) Also moot. There is no correlation between the resolution's proposition and the amount of education revolving around AIDS. The AFF has still failed to tell me how this effects his proposition that gay men should be ostracized for having sex with one another. If my opponent would like to propose that we educate the African population on safe sex and the spread of AIDS, I will gladly agree but would not agree that it has anything to do with homosexual men. 4) What is your source for that? I have a source stating that heterosexuality is the preferred practice in Sub-Sahara Africa. Your attack on that point is just speculation. My point stands on credibility and you reject his attack based on a lack thereof. CONCERNING CONTENTION TWO 1) You have proved that it is the case in America. The resolution is concerning the population of the world with HIV/AIDS. I have provided a source concerning the entire world and the condition of their sexual preference. You default NEG in this case because of a lack of topicality in the resolution. 2) That doesn't hold because the resolution is not concerned about Pokemon or their flamethrowers. The resolution is simply concerned with AIDS and the causes therein. Anything having to do with Pokemon and flamethrowers are irrelevant. You default NEG because my opponent's attack on my contention two has nothing to do with the resolution. Again, a topical error. And Elton John and I are friends. That is all. That video you showed was an impostor. After all, he did Rocketman! http://www.youtube.com... "Coming back to the prevalence of AIDS in men of homosexual persuasion (who persuaded them, I don't know) Centres for Disease Control and Prevention established that the primary transmission of HIV (which leads to AIDS) in the United States was through "male-to-male sexual contact"." Sure, but that's only the a speck on the apple. The apple has a majority heterosexual. Saying that The United States is relevant to the majority only applies where it is the majority of the world with AIDS which I have already proven does not. "This is why AIDS used to be known as "Gay-Related Immune Deficiency" (GRID). However, the gay mafia and their apologists in government and the media didn't want homosexual men to be stigmatised by holding them responsible for this monstrous pandemic and insisted in changing the name of the disease to disguise the truth." Again, this is pertinent only to the US. You have yet to show me how the rest of the world is effected. My case still stands because my opponent's attacks have a lack of topicality. His defense of his own case is flawed insofar as it deals with one minute portion of the scope of the resolution. You have no choice but to vote in Negation. ~EG