9/11 was an inside job and the official 9/11 Commission Report does not explain what really happened

Hello. I am for the Pro. side of this debate. I will show you very convincing evidence of why 9/11 was an inside job and also that the official 9/11 Commission Report does not explain what really happened. After I do that, or if you are convinced that I have done that effectively, then I invite you to vote "Pro". Thank you. I welcome my opponent and look forward to an interesting debate. I will now begin: The towers were brought down by demolition explosives, not because a plane crashed into them. To quote CNN from that day: "The way this structure is collapsing, it is the result of something planted, It is not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse, then the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way, how they accomplished this, we don't know."[1] I will show that the official 9/11 story does not make sense for these reasons: A. WARNINGS -They claim there were no warnings. But there were many warnings. B. 19 HIJACKERS -There were no Arab names whatsoever on the passenger logs. 6 of the 19 men listed are still alive. C. OSAMA BIN LADEN -No evidence has ever linked any of the alive or dead "hijackers" to Osama Bin Laden. The alleged confession tape is planted evidence. In the video he has darker skin fuller cheeks and broader nose than the Osama bin Laden in other videos. Also the issue of right handedness, when in the FBI files he is left handed, shows that the video is not a true confession tape. There are many connections between Bin Laden family and Bush family, one is the Carlyle Group, which is one of world's largest defense contractors, which continues to reap massive profits off of the post 9/11 war on terrorism. Also Bush Sr. met with Bin Laden's Brother on 9/11. D. PENTAGON - A 60 ton 125 ft. wide 44 foot tall plane was somehow guided through an obstacle course of hazards without hitting any and executed a 270 degree downward spiral, but Hani Hanjour was known as a terrible pilot, who could not safely fly even a small plane. "I am still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon...He could not fly at all..." - AZ. Flight School Employee. No seats, no luggage, and no bodies were found. The official story is that intense heat from the burning jet fuel vaporized the entire plane. Flight 77 was a 757 and it had 2 Rolls Royce engines made of steel and titanium alloy which weighed 6 tons each. It is scientifically impossible that 12 tons of steel and titanium was vaporized by jet fuel. Also according to the CNN Live Report at the time they said "no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the pentagon". Afterwards there was a literal "cover up"! Dirt and gravel was dumped on the lawn to literally cover up any forensic evidence. Also the videos which would HAVE shown what really happened were immediately confiscated by agents of the FBI and the Dept. Of Justice to this day has refused to release them. E. SHANKSVILLE- Here are 2 official quotes from an authority who was on the scene. 1. "It looks like there is nothing there except for a hole in the ground." 2. "It looked like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped trash into it." Wally Miller- Sommerset County Coroner. There was nothing that you could see to distinguish that a plane had crashed there. F. TRADE TOWERS 1,2, 7 - The official story is the "Pancake theory" where floors falling would start a chain reaction. If this really happened one would expect to see a column of core columns still standing and floors piled up at the bottom. The core was made up of 47 massive steel columns, and they would have still been sticking up in the air 1,000 feet high. "The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners"- Frank A. Demartini (Manager, WTC Construction). When the building collapsed the building was near free fall speed, it encountered no resistance whatsoever. There is no scenario where the pancake effect will allow buildings to fall at the rate that they did. So what can do that? What can move mass out of the way? Explosives. And there is evidence of core columns that were cut at an angle. And there was molten metal for well over 6 week after the collapse. Hot spots of over 2000 degrees were documented in the debris (that is 500 degree F. hotter than Jet fuel even burns). What do the reports say about the metal? they say nothing! Thermite is where it came from. Dr. Steven Jones, Physics Professor, BYU - found thermite explosive compound and high sulfur content. He found it below bldg 7 too (WHICH WASN'T EVEN HIT BY A JET YET COLLAPSED!) - a 47 story building that fell that was not hit by a plane! The central columns of other towers were taken out first so they didn't structurally damage buildings that were close to them. The official explanation was fire. But NEVER before or after 911, has any steel building collapsed from fire. The characteristics fit the model of controlled demolition exactly. There also were sub basement explosions that occurred seconds before the first plane hit. William Rodriguez, the last man out, talks about that on his website [2] An explosion in the B2-B3 levels pushed him upwards. G. NORAD - The scramble order of fighters is usually 10 minutes before they intercept. On 9/11 it took 80 min. before the jets even launched. There was deliberate confusion in place so they could not respond. On 9/11 a number of conflicting war game exercises were taking place which involved false radar blips on the screens. One was called "Operation Vigilant Warrior". It was a live-fly hijack drill being conducted at the same time. There were only 8 planes available at the time to scramble. There were too many intercepts and couldn't distinguish real world from exercises. Dick Cheney was in charge at the time. H. 9/11 COMMISSION - The 9/11 Commission could not trace the source of the funding but concluded by saying "it is of little consequence". Also Building 7 is NOT even mentioned in the official report. When Bush and Cheney met with the 9/11 commission they did so only on their own terms: Together, not under oath, no press or family members were allowed to attend, no recordings of any kind was allowed, no transcript allowed. The 9/11 report was a "unanimous report" which means any objections to anything were not reported. I. TERRORISM -One of the possible motivations of the 9/11 attacks could be that it was a "False Flag" operation. There are techniques used by governments to manipulate public opinion in order to further their agenda. There is a lot of evidence to support this opinion and I am also willing to expound further on this point if so desired. I believe that I have given sufficient evidence here to convince you that 9/11 was an inside job and also that the official 9/11 Commission Report does not explain what really happened. I encourage you to vote "Pro". I now look forward to my opponent's rebuttal. 1. www.warnthepeople.org (video #7) 2. www.william911.com