Islam (Pro) vs. Christianity (Con)

A 10,000 character, error filled response AND NOT ONE WORD to DEFEND ISLAM. NOT ONE WORD to prove that Allah is God. NOT ONE WORD to prove that a child molesting, mass murdering, psychopath with a 9 year old bride, is God's profit. NOT ONE WORD to to address Muhammad's failed prophecies. NOT ONE WORD to explain why the "god" of Islam has to continuously "Abrogate" his own teachings. NOT ONE WORD to explain why Allah is so weak he can't prevent his "Prophet" from being possessed. NOT ONE WORD to explain why Allah is so weak he can't see into Bahrain. YOUR title in this debate is Islam (Pro)....But you offer nothing that is Pro Islam. NOT ONE WORD to defend what you claim to be true. Isn't that amazing?!?!? I ran out of room providing factual evidence for why Jesus is God. I had to resort to providing links, because One Million characters wouldn't have been enough room to detail all the fulfilled prophesies in Christian Scripture. While I COULDN'T WAIT to explain why Jesus is God, YOU COULDN'T START to explain why Allah is god or why anyone should take Islam seriously. (well...other than that whole threat of death, if you don't agree with Allah that the Earth is flat, thing...) But I can understand why you would rather attack what you clearly do not understand, than try to advocate a false religion that can only survive by revisionist history and threats of violence against those who speak the truth. How could you advocate a false religion that actually has rules regarding how children should be molested? Top Islamic scholars' explanations of Qur'an 65:4 show that the verse assumes consummation of marriage with prepubescent girls http://quotingislam.blogspot.com... A false religion that treats women as sub-human, http://www.thereligionofpeace.com... A false religion of murderers who advocate the murder of anyone who disagrees - even in "first world" nations. List of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad https://wikiislam.net... A third of Muslim students in Britain believe killing someone in the name of religion is justified, a new poll claims http://www.telegraph.co.uk... As I said before the difference between true Christianity and Islam could not be more apparent. But of all the errors and mistakes, that you have cut and pasted in your response...probably the largest, is this. Catholics are NOT Christians. Attempting to attack Christianity by quoting Catholic scripture is the same as saying a Sunni is wrong because of what a Shiite said or vice-versa. The Catholic Church has been attempting to pervert God's word from the very start. So the fact that you can not understand a Catholic bible which was designed to be corrupt is not a big surprise. Thus, when you cut and paste these hysterical rants from various websites, (that you obviously don't understand), such as - "The bible is corrupted" what you really mean is that YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE BIBLE IS CORRUPTED. It is hard to imagine how someone could make as many mistakes as you made in one single paragraph. Your remarks are the result of the total failure to research what you are writing about and demonstrate a clear problem with the ability to think logically. Even your attacks upon the false Catholic texts are completely wrong. Paul's letters, DETAILING THE RESURECTION were written DECADES before any of the four gospels. How you could jump to the conclusion that if something wasn't written in the Catholic version of Mark, which was written decades AFTER Paul's letters, that somehow this effects what is written in Matthew and Luke is just crazy. The entire purpose of having four gospels is because they record history from a different point of view. Not everything, appears in every gospel. From there you proceed to make the absurd statement that these false Catholic texts are the "earliest, oldest and main source", The King James Bible is the MOST PUBLISHED BOOK in the history of the world. This is the MAIN SOURCE of Christian Scripture, In no way, does the real, true and correct Bible make use of the false Alexandrian manuscripts. Of course, in the real Bible, the Resurection is mentioned in Mark. And of course, when the websites you cut and paste from attempt to attack Christianity they want NO PART of questioning the King James Bible. NIV sure, ESB sure, NEW king james sure. You can have a feild day attacking those bibles. But not the KJV Bible. And lastly, you conclude the error fest with this gem. "Also, not to mention that Catholi bibles have 73 books while protestant bibles have 66 books. [5] This alone testifies that the Bible is corrupted" If one book is lying and the other is telling the truth, concluding that both are lying is a demonstration of intelligence, that speaks for itself. I could go on exposing how every thing Pro has written is in error, but why? If he can't understand how H2O can exist as Ice, Water and Steam and still be the same thing, How could he understand a God that has always existed as three parts? How can he understand a God that died for him? Rather than demand that he die for God? How can he understand a God that DOES for him rather than a "god" that demands he DO for God. In the quest to find which religion is offering the truth, this is the first test one should consider putting their faith to. It is just two very simple words. DO and DONE. False religions teach - Do this...Do that"Do some other thing, etc. Do, pay with your money" Do, pay with your time"Do, strap bombs to your children"Do, fly airplanes into buildings...Do, murder and say it"s in God"s name"Do, say a certain number of repetitive prayers" as if this will "earn" forgiveness of sin and God"s love. "Do" religions teach that God"s approval is for sale and thus can be bought or earned, usually by a series of actions that conveniently enough make the people selling that religion very rich. "Done" religion teaches that God has already DONE everything necessary for you to have an eternity in Heaven. It is a gift; all you have to do is receive it. You should well know the cost of that gift, was so high that the very idea that you could contribute to it in any way, is absurd. You are receiving the full righteousness of Jesus Christ while he accepts your unrighteousness. What could anyone possibly offer to pay for this? This DO or DONE test is a serious and legitimate question that every person seeking a genuine relationship with God should be asking of their own faith. But when you have been raised in a hateful religion that demands constant suffering and blind obidence, finding the courage to ask such questions is not very likely.