Corruption of Bible

hey Lord10049, the muslim veiw (Islam) is that the Bible we have today is not the same what Jesus (New testment) had neither Moses (Old testment) had peace be upon them. Quran 2:79 Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:"This is from Allah (God)," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby.So this is introduction to what i going to debate. Muslims believe that the originals scriptures of Moses and Jesus (p) are from God. but they have been changed through time. first to mention is that we dont have the original manuscripts (new testment) its unanimously agreed christain & non christain scholars alike. what we have is copies of the copies of the copies of the copies....94% of the manuscripts comes from the 9th/10th century (800 years after jesus) .from the first century we have none. from the secondcentury we have only 1 piece the Rylands Library Papyrus P52. its size approximately 21 cm by 16 cm, a small piece like a card from the gospel of john. from the 3th and 4th comes the rest. Although there are more manuscripts that preserve the New Testament than there are for any other ancient writing, not even 2 are identical with another, anything is different.the amount of the manuscripts makes the problem more serious because the more you have, more discrepancies you get. and there is more variations among these manuscripts than words in new testment. So its makes it so difficult to know what was the original words.secondly, transmission - copying was difficult because at that time you would not find a printers. all the written texts were hand writing. so obviously scribes did a mistakes all over the place,or they tryed to correct things. for examples - unintentionally:confusing similar sounding letters or similarly shaped letters.some manuscripts contained notes or glosses in the margins from earlier scribes. These notes sometimes found their way into the text of the manuscript.Word substitions: Errors could also occur when scribes trying to retain a line in their memory accidentally replaced some words with close synonyms. repeating text or omitting text. They frequently occur when a word, phrase, or line begins with a similar string of letters (homoeoarcton) or ends with a similar string of letters (homoeoteleuton), causing the eyes to skip forward or backward. IntentionalyHarmonization: The wording of a particular phrase or sentence was sometimes altered to reflect the wording of another similar but more familiar one. A scribe would sometimes make his copy using more than one manuscript. Where the wording of the exemplars differed from each other, a scribe would sometimes conflate both readings into one.Some scribes to try to improve the style of a text. Thirdly, if you pick the bible and check it, what you will see is the Titles "The gospel according to mattew/luke/john/mark". why "according to"? Because not a single one of the 5 thousand copies says nothing about the author. so they assuming that the gospels are according to " mattew/luke/john/mark". so the authors are unknown, we dont know where they lived, how they write,when why and what source they picked from. like the author Book of Kings is unknown.Plagiarism: Plagiarism is a common amongst the anonymous authors of the books of the Bible. Matthew and Luke reproduce 85% or Marks text, why and how two different authors write the same work? language:Jesus language was aramaic/hebrow. the manuscripts we have today is in greek, this is a paradox. changing or translation one lanuage to another is not 100% accurate and you will lost some meaning/content for synonyms.Todays bibles:the most familiar versions are the protastent and the catholics, catholics have 7 books more, anyway from the earliest manuscripts we can see many forgeries in today bibles. like:John 7:53-8:12 - Jesus and the woman about to be stoned by the mob. its dont exist in the oldest manuscripts of the Gospel of John after Jesus died, Mary Magdalene and two other women came back to the tomb to anoint the body of Jesus.John 5:7-8 the backbone of the holy trinity - is a forgery.official canon:There was no official Church orthodox cannon for centuries, you had several different Bible cannons for 400 years, different books claiming to be inspired, each Christian sect having their own Bible which they believed in. the gospel of Jesus:what we have today is the 4 gospels, not 1 is attributed to jesus. 1. "And Jesus went...preaching the gospel,... and healing every disease among the people." (Matthew 9:35) 2. "...but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it." (Mark 8:35) 3. "...preached the gospel..." (Luke 20:1) Old testment: In the first five books of the Bible - Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy - there are more than 700 statements which prove not only that God is NOT the Author of these books, but that EVEN Moses himself had no hand in them. Open these books at random and you will see: "And the Lord said unto him, Away, get thee down..." "And Moses said unto the Lord, the people cannot come..." "And the Lord said unto Moses, Go on before the people..." "And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying..." "And the Lord said unto Moses, Get down, charge the..." It is manifest and apparent that these are NEITHER the Words of God NOR of Moses. They indicate the voice of a third person writing from hearsay. Moses didnt write deut:"So Moses ... DIED ... And he (God Almighty) BURIED HIM (Moses) ... he was 120 years old when he DIED ... And there arose not a prophet SINCE in Israel like unto Moses ..." (Deut. 34:5-10). how can it be?My sources are from Bart d. ehrman and Ahmed Deedat.Now to you.