Christianity has no valid basis to exist.

Unfortunately, he has just ended up confirming the underlying foundation of my OP. That Christianity is not based on any kind of truth but purely on myth.1. Adam&Eve -> JesusYour response is purely circular. You cannot defend the existence of Jesus on the myth that he is purporting to have sacrificed him for. You are also avoiding my point that the story of Adam & Eve could not literally have happened since t is counter to human origins. Please address the OP.2. Virgin BirthAh, so Adam & Eve is not a myth but Jesus' virgin birth is? Then it appears then that you agree that Jesus' miracles are likely untrue. In doing so, you are confirming this point is precisely relevant to the resolution: if Jesus' virgin birth didn't happen, then that Mary's birth would also not be immaculate and therefore, Jesus is not born without sin at all. Making his eventual sacrifice a false one. Hence, another pillar of Jesus' sacrifice disappears.3. ResurrectionI know the story, I am telling you the Bible is describing something that is wrong. I am telling you that when a body dies then it immediately begins to decay. All cells will die because there is no longer any oxygen to feed them. If you're now saying that Jesus' resurrection is also a myth then please do so. But if you do then you knock down the last pillar of the purpose of Christianity.4. Miraclesif Christianity has a valid basis to exist, then you are also throwing any other story/tale/myth/legend into this as well which includes Judaism, Islamic beliefs, Buddhism, and basically any other religion imaginable. Precisely! But we are focusing on Christianity in this OP. __________________________________________________________________> that which is seemingly impossible should not exist. This is not what I'm saying. I am saying that if the claims for Jesus' existence and purpose are founded on myth, then there is no real basis for Christianity to exist either. Firstly, you have yet to hold a position that these miracles are true and indeed, admit most of them are not true - this is what I argue too. If you can find a denomination of Christianity that do not take these as literally true then they are likely not really a Christian religion but a Jesusian one. I. What is 'possible or not' is a poor standard for determining what should or shouldn't exist, and is generally harmful. With it being known that Christianity would not be the only thing whose right to exist is jeopardized by the implementation of such standards, it is imperative that my opponent present justification for the immediate dismissal of other related things. Other religions are irrelevant to this discussion. That said, any religion that requires impossible things to have happened are susceptible to this argument. The harm of ignoring such rich histories, regardless of their possibility or impossible elements would outweigh whatever outcome would come from erasing everything 'impossible' from our historical paradigm of understanding. There is no harm at all. Greek, Roman and Nordic religions still enrich us but not as religions but as stories. It should be the same for Christianity - that it is the story of a culture that is waning in its influence. II. History, tradition and continued practice of Christianity provides justification and a valid basis for its existence. The only thing it determines is the likelihood of the story actually being probable, not whether the story in itself exists or not. But Christianity doesn't exist as a story though does it? It exists as a factual set of claims of miracles and impossible acts being the basis its religion. In ConclusionI suspect that my opponent may be taking the line of argumentation that Christianity's existence is something other than a religion. I would suggest that to ignore that point is not what the OP is about or what Christianity is. Clearly, I am saying that Christianity is not a valid religion. Please address those points. Please also confirm whether you believe that A&E,VB&R are actual of mythical.