Trump is not fit to serve, due to his volatile, immature and dangerous personality

You did not point out what that "most recent piece of evidence" of Trump being racist is. But I have plenty of recent evidence that clearly demonstrates how racist he is, and I would be happy to list all of it, if I had more characters. However, I can give two famous examples. The first is when he said "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. ... They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists." That's obvious racism right there. He's characterizing all Mexicans as bad people who have drugs. The second example is his support for the "birtherism" movement, which claims that Obama was actually born in Kenya. You can read the 11 other examples that have compiled by the Huffington Post at https://goo.gl... Andrew Jackson was an interesting choice to select because he actually happens to be Trump's "hero .... and a reflection of [him]self," as Trump himself put it (https://goo.gl...). Andrew Jackson was extremely racist, and it definitely affected his presidency negatively. Although Jackson was beneficial to the economy of the time, he also supported slavery. He had 150 slaves at the time of his death (according to the official website of his plantation at https://goo.gl...). Andrew Jackson cared so little about his slaves that "their names are rarely encountered beyond bills of sale, runaway notices and passing observations." Clearly, he saw them as property. The Jackson family owned more than 300 men, women and children like you might own a desk or a chair. Andrew Jackson also passed the Indian Removal Act of 1930 that forced any Native American who didn't want to live under American law west of the Mississippi River without time to gather their belongings or prepare for the journey. This killed an entire 4,000 Cherokee people out of the estimated 16,000 that were forced from their homes. On top of all that, Andrew Jackson also regularly participated in fatal duels with guns and threatened the members of his cabinet with violence. One on occasion, he threatened to hang one member of his cabinet and shoot another. 8 years later, someone asked him what his regrets were, and the only answer he gave was "[That] I didn"t shoot Henry Clay and I didn"t hang John C. Calhoun" (https://goo.gl...). Think about it. Let's say you're the president, or any elected official, in office, and you are really racist (no offense). Throughout your term, you are bound to make numerous, maybe even hundreds of decisions that could affect one race or the other. If you have such a huge bias against so many people, do you really think you can make every decision fairly? No, you can't. It's impossible. Even though every American is racist, we must work as hard as we can as a society to lower this racism to a level as low as possible. Laws don't stop racism. Racists unfortunately have as much freedom of speech as you and I do. As I said in my previous argument, Trump's election has actually increased the number of racist and hate-fuelled incidents. Even if Trump manages to go through his whole presidency without making hundreds of unfair decisions (which he won't, because he's racist), the fact that he is in office still makes it so that racists know they can say whatever they want. You said that people vote knowing the conditions of the electoral college. Most Americans believe that the president should be elected by a popular vote, according to a recent poll (https://goo.gl...) from during the election. Unsurprisingly, most of the people who want to preserve the electoral college are Republican, since his candidate was leading in the election. However, if the question was answered only based on qualities of fairness (like whether or not the most popular candidate should win, which is much more logical than the EC), those Republicans would certainly change their minds. When a white man rammed his truck into several pedestrians outside of a London mosque, killing one and injuring several, Trump totally ignored the attack in his tweets. Instead, he focuses on attacks from people living in the Middle East. Trump's anti-Mexican comments that I mentioned above show how much he hates foreigners. So does his statement that Mexicans are filled with "tremendous infectious disease" (https://goo.gl...). He has also been extremely rude to leaders of foreign countries. https://goo.gl... shows only one of many existing examples of this fact. If you were a homophobe and didn't want people to know about it, stating that you're not would be the first step in clearing yourself of accusations of homophobia. The military ban was not necessarily anti-gay, but it was definitely anti-LGBTQ. As I stated before (TWICE), bias against large groups of people makes it impossible to make fair decisions as president, since issues regarding race go by the president extremely often. Transgender surgeries do not "ultimately cost more" than Viagra. Transgender surgeries cost more per trans person than Viagra does per male. However, that statistic assumes that every transgender gets a surgery from the military, and that every male gets Viagra. You still haven't responded to the idea of simply ordering the military to stop paying for transgender surgeries, nor did you respond to the fact that Trump is slowly building a support network of homophobic hate groups. According to that Department of Defense document at https://goo.gl... (which I read, and you probably haven't), these transgender surgeries are "medically necessary." It also says that they are "unaware" of any kind of analysis from Trump that confirms that transgenders cost the military a lot of money. That document also estimates that the cost of finding and replacing all discharged service members would cost $960 million and that this would gain an annual savings of, AT THE VERY MOST, $656. So I agree that this idea results in "long term savings", but those savings are extremely long term. If you graph a function to represent money saved by Trump's ban (f(x) = 656x), the x-axis represents years and the y-axis represents money saved each year by eliminating transgender surgeries. Then you would graph y = 960,000,000 to represent the point at which the money saved negated the money lost. The functions intercept at the coordinate (14634.146, 960000000), meaning that the date when the annual savings negate the money spent will be March 20, in the year 16651. Yes, you read that right. A five-digit year. And that was only when I factored in the MAXIMUM annual savings of transgender surgeries provided by the DOD. Therefore, it would almost certainly take longer than that. An image of the graph I made is at https://goo.gl.... If you don't look at it within 78 hours of when I posted the image, it will disappear. My apologies. You said he's not volatile even though he shifted his opinions totally over 10 years. Not just about political issues, but also a lot about his own personal beliefs in regards to life advice. Most of his political opinions have shifted from left to right over the years, but a couple have been shifting in the opposite direction. A study (https://goo.gl...) shows most people stick with what they believe their parent's political affiliation to be, so I don't see anything that remotely proves the statement "most people have significant changes in the way they view things," except for your faulty assumptions. Also, did you see the quote about his abortion beliefs?? It's the fifth row and it's to the far right. He flip-flopped between pro-life and pro-choice a total of six times As I stated, I concede the point of isolationism. A better description would be that he is strongly against cooperation with other countries, except for Russia. Now don't pull out some obscure quote that says he wants to work with Mexico, because I have a source above that shows his extreme rudeness and aversion to other countries I used one example of many. All of his speeches are like that, and his interviews. Any transcripts you find that sounds logical was either written for him or they edited out the nonsense. A man whose thoughts go from one thing to another as fast as Trump's do cannot possibly focus adequately on the demanding task of being a president Trump has already made exactly 1,950 false or misleading statements over the course of 347 days (as of Jan. 1, 2018), according to the WP (https://goo.gl...). At this rate, Trump will have lied about 8,234 times by the end of his presidency. You might want to compare Trump to Obama, but Obama only lied 18 times during his entire presidency. An elected official who lies is intentionally misleading the public Whether Trump denies climate change or not is less important than how much attention he pays to it. If he doesn't pay it any attention, the world will descend into a living hell created by nature (https://goo.gl...). That should be a priority, but he instead canceled the Paris climate accord, which also made no sense. Although Trump said that other countries are "laughing at us," the goals that were set for America were set by Obama, and there was no penalty whatsoever for not accomplishing them. Trump could have remained in the deal and motivated the country to fix the environment, but instead he dropped out and pissed off the world The very first example of a narcissistic president on your list, LBJ, was most known among his staff for pulling out his penis in front of men, bragging about it in front of everyone, and publicly naming it Jumbo. In fact, name one undeniably good thing LBJ did without Googling it. I certainly can't do it. Also, College Humor comedian Adam Conover compared Trump to LBJ (https://goo.gl...) As I have said many times before, nobody is perfect (or devoid of racism, sexism, etc) but we must work together in order to eliminate negative qualities as much we can