Hitler was a British agent

I accept the terms you mentioned. First and foremost I will declare: 1- All of my comments are based on intelligence source as related in a few texts for which I will give the reference after the quotation. 2- These information are far from the mainstream history related in school books and medias. We know the mainstream version but mainstream history has been proved many times over to be complete fabrication. We can take the American aboriginals history for example. True history is called "Knowledge of power" by intelligence agencies and is reserved for top officials. This very debate is based on that. 3- I'm French so forgive my limited vocabulary. ARGUMENT 1 : HITLER WAS AN ANTI-SEMITE - Thank you for this argument. Unfortunately you gave us the mainstream history of the events. I'm going to quote Hitler, Churchill (British politician) and the Tavistock Military Psych-Ops War School training line (British institute) all at the same time (isn't it ironic) because they've all said it in more or less the same words: "In wartime, we provide truth with a bodyguard of lies because it is so precious. " Basically what it means is that lies are prevalent and truth is kept a very well guarded secret. So bringing the mainstream history argument is not only pre visible but far from the level of argumentation we are writing about here. Of course if there was a conspiracy to regroup Jews with the goal of creating the state of Israel maybe even Hitler didn't know about it. Information are compartmentalized even amongst the highest level officials. "JFK said there's someone behind the throne greater than the king himself" and I believe this is the case here once again. As related in the previous comment Adolf Hitler was the 2nd and 3rd degree incestuous son of Alois Hitler who was the son of Maria Anna Schicklgruber and Salomon Mayer Rothschild. The Rothschilds control all of the world's central banks except for a few. They've been known to finance both sides of just about every conflict in history. WWII is not different as it's been shown that they've boosted Germany's economy through the Federal reserve and the Bank of England. Not to mention that the Balfour declaration was addressed to Lord Rothschild. In just about every situation when you need to get to the bottom of things, you must follow the money. In this case Hitler's money came from The Rothschild family. Information from article: Hitler Was Financed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England By Ian Greenhalgh - June 11, 2016 . https://www.veteranstoday.com... ARGUMENT 2: LEAD IS STILL VERY EXPENSIVE You argue about the fact that lead would have been cheaper. Ammunition plants produce more than a million rounds everyday and that's just one manufacture. I don't believe that a few million bullets would have been the problem. Not only lead is cheaper than food but it is much cheaper than maintaining millions of humans for years. Cheaper than building concentration camps. Cheaper than transporting them to death camps. Cheaper than disposing of the body themselves. If you really want to get rid of Jews you slaughter them on the spot and let the local population deal with the bodies. The "modus operendi" is pretty clear here. Whatever the reason why he was regrouping the Jews, he wasn't trying to kill them. ARGUMENT 3: HITLER'S FUNNY MOVES Thank you once again for bringing the mainstream history point of view. The questions I asked were only two of a long list of Hitler's questionable moves as mentioned by Historian Henry Makow Ph. D. "Why the Nazi war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England. Why Hitler was able to expand into the Rhineland without fear of retaliation. Why Hitler let 335,000 Allied soldiers escape at Dunkirk. Why Hitler attacked Russia before England was invaded or conquered. Why the Nazis never figured out their communications were compromised. Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at Gibraltar. Why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral. Why Hitler didn't conquer the oil fields of Russia and the Middle East. Why Hitler gave his racial policies priority over actually winning the war. Why I. G. Farben was never bombed, and became the CIA headquarters in Frankfurt after WWII. " You unfortunately failed to explain why Hitler spared the lives of so many British soldiers in Dunkirk. Your argument doesn't really explain and instead distort the events. It is reported even in mainstream History that it was Hitler's decision to stop advancing on British troops. Not a failed chain of command. "On May 24, 1940, the German army appeared to winning the war as Allied Forces were surrounded by land at Dunkirk. But instead of continuing the invasion, Hitler ordered his army to halt for three days, a decision that has puzzled historians for over 70 years. " . https://www.express.co.uk... ARGUMENT 4: JEWISH POPULATION DISPLACEMENT If there is a better way to displace a population than to forcibly do so? I would love to read about it. He wasn't trying to create Jewish tension, he actively hunted all Jews in Europe. Selecting them by blood, not by affiliation or by politic views or by IQ or anything that would be considered a legitimate mean to get rid of a conspiracy within the Zionist ranks. Anyone with Jewish blood weather it was kids, old people, etc. .. were gathered. Does babies conspire against Germany and the world too? ARGUMENT 5: HITLER WAS IN VIENNA IN 1912 Unfortunately we won't agree on that one. And once again you brought the mainstream history. Here's a quote from the Book "Hitler was a British agent" written by Greg Hallett: "The most authoritative book on Hitler has no knowledge of Hitler's activities during the two years and four months from January 1911 to 24 May 1913. " Here's what Historian Henry Makow, Ph. D. , United States have to say about Greg Hallett: "Greg Hallett offers persuasive circumstantial evidence that Hitler was a British Agent. As Hitler was in Britain 1912-13 other historians are guilty of sanitizing Hitler, giving him more credibility that he had. Hitler was a British Agent is a useful paradigm that clarifies many improbable events . . . " Adolph Hitler was in England in 1912-1913, a fact supported by his sister-in-law's book: "The Memoirs of Bridget Hitler"(1979). Many historians including Hitler biographer John Toland have ignored this startling information. ARGUMENT 6: HITLER MAY HAVE BEEN A JEW I think that we pretty much agree on this point. "History repeats every sixty years plus or minus two years. To study the present day, the most effective starting point is to go back sixty years from the present historical figures and examine the training of their predecessors. In each war there are double agents that go right to the top. The more effective they are, the more compromised they are, and the more they are secretly protected afterwards, right through the ages. Wars are always created through double agents and compromised principles. Wars are always based on profit. Those who profit ignore the deaths. Those who suffer never get past the deaths. In this way it takes an unencumbered generation to illuminate the hoax of war. To create a war, you first have to invent a fictitious enemy and then go out and kill them without killing your own double agent. In most instances you have to grow the double agent and the enemy yourself. This has been common practice for over a century. Stalin began his British training in 1907 and Hitler began his British training in 1912. In both cases these double agents ended up as Heads of State running foreign countries given to them by their trainers. Stalin was from Georgia and was given Russia; Hitler was from Austria and given Germany. " - Hitler was a British agent.