I am kohai

I would like to begin this debate by submitting several pieces of evidence that show that my opponent is indeed the same person who has debated under the aliases of Kohai, Militant Atheist, and Agnostic86. For the sake of this debate I shall refer to these persons all as Kohai regardless of the actual login name of a given debate.Before I being the debate, I would like to clear up some issues with he resolution. My opponent as instigator has written an incredibly poorly phrased resolution. If the resolution is argued as written, I am actually arguing that I am kohai... I am not kohai. However, the spirit of the debate (as noted in my opponent's opening round) is to prove that HE is kohai. So I would like to conceptually amend the resolution to state "GMDebater is the same person as the debater known as Kohai, MillitantAtheist, and Agnostic86"C1) This clarification also serves as my first line of evidence. Kohai has a history of posting poorly worded resolutions, typically due to posting them without carefully thinking through the implications of the words he chooses. Please see http://www.debate.org... and http://www.debate.org... for examples. In both cases Kohai's opponent easily defeated him using a semantic attack againsta poorly worded resolution. I could have done something similar in this case by saying "Yes I am." I would have proven the resolution true by claiming to be Kohai, and therefore would won.C2) My second point of evidence is the structure found within the debates, particularly the FIRST debate that each profile initiated.GMdebater: http://www.debate.org...Kohai (As MillitantAtheist): http://www.debate.org...Please note that in both debates we have opening remarks that indicate that they are new debaters. This in itself would not be uncommon, but when we look at the remainder of the round we see shocking similarities. First, we see an almost identical structure and layout for how the debate will unfold. This is a highly developed structure and reflects experience on this site. Also note that both opening topics are attacks on the Bible, which is typical of Kohai's chosen debate preference. Also note the commun use of the phrase "Opening Syllogism" from GMdebater's first debate and MillitantAtheist's debate: http://www.debate.org...C3) Both Kohai and GMDebater have shown a tendency to post profile comments rather than to use the private messaging function of this website.GMDebater: https://picasaweb.google.com...Kohai (as Kohai): https://picasaweb.google.com...Kohai (As MillitantAtheist): https://picasaweb.google.com...C4) My next point of evidence is the geographical and age similarity of the two profilesGMDebater: http://www.debate.org...Kohai (As MilitantAtheist): http://www.debate.org...Note that they are both late teens, both from Aberdeen, MD. These two things by themselves are circumstantial, but when taken in conjunction with the other evidence they build a picture of two persons who are from the same area, are similar in age, debate similar topics, show very similar behavioral patterns, and use the same opening argument.According to City-Data.com Aberdeen ( http://www.city-data.com... ) and Aberdeen Proving Ground ( http://www.city-data.com... ) have a combined population of 17510 (14099 and 3411 respectively, 2009). 8517 of those residents are male (6701 and 116 respectively). These two "cities" are 13 minutes apart (Center to Center, Google Maps) and cover aproximately 12.75 square miles. ( http://maps.google.com... )I ask you the reader... is it more likely that two persons with such striking similarities would both live in the same small geographical location, with a relatively smll population, and both end up on this website debating the same people on the same topics... or is it more likely that they are in fact the same person?Thank you.