The gift of debating and speech isn't necessarily good.

Hello again: Shall we try this one again?The resolution is simple: The gift of speech and debating isn't necessarily good.To other readers; Me and my opponent tried to debate this once but due to uncontrollable reasons we decided to tie the debate and try again later; with that later being now. The format is the same as before more or less.we will be using the following definitions: gift:a natural ability or talent."he has a gift for comedy" synonyms: talent, flair, aptitude, facility, knack, technique, touch, bent, ability,expertise, capacity, capability, power, faculty debate: a formal discussion on a particular matter in a public meeting or legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward and which usually ends with a vote. argue about (a subject), especially in a formal manner. speech: a formal address or discourse delivered to an audience. Good:1. In the interest or well being of the audience, those being subjected to the speech or debate.Paraphrased resolution is thus:"Being a talented speaker or debater isn't neceserally good, in the interest of or well being of those that are listening to you." I will argue in favor of the resolution that being extremely talented in debating and speech isn't necessarily a good thing and might not be in favor for the general population. 5 rounds, 4 will be used for debating, 72 hours to post the argument, 10.000 characters, a month of voting time (I felt like it last time and I didn't bother to change it)Few ground rules:1. There will be four rounds, with one round for acceptance, rules or dismissal (see below). 2. my opponent has the choice of going first and present his arguments in the first round. if he chooses to do so he must type in the fourth and final round for something akin to "No round as agreed upon". 3. If you chose to use sources they must be properly cited (a.k.a No plagiarism) 4. try to make structured and logical arguments.5. no forfeits. I'd appreciate it if you can make the most of your rounds. 6. try and follow the round structure below Failure to follow these rules by either party will result in a 7 point penalty.The round structure is as followed for either party:Round 1: Rules set by Pro, Con accepts or starts his opening statement.Round 2: Opening statements by both parties. If Con was first he may post his rebuttals.Round 3: Rebuttals by both parties.Round 4: further Rebuttals by both parties: If Con went first He'll post his final rebuttals and closing statement.round 5: Closing statements. If Con went first he forfeits this round and Pro won't make any new arguments as Con cannot refute them. If Pro went first Con won't make any new arguments as pro cannot refute them. Any further discussion, questions or revisions on the rules and structure of the debate should be posted in the comments or debates before the debate has been accepted. Accepting the debate without objection and reaching an agreement and posting the next round signals that you have agreed with the terms set forth in this round.To avoid any uncomfortable situations neither party should object to nor challenge the definitions, rules or other terms once the debate has started.everything clear? good. Good luck and happy debating.