Does god exist

Argument from the big bang: .Before the big bang there was no time, so there is no time for anything to cause the big bang in, except for a timeless being, who is God. .The cause must be beyond space and time, because it created space and time .The cause must be uncaused, eternal, because an infinite number of past events is impossible. .The cause must be immaterial because it created material things. .God exists Its not god the gaps: . We know that the universe had a beginning . We know that time and space had a beginning . We know that material things had a beginning . We know it came from nothing Argument from biological evolution . We know that evolution by natural selection did occur. But there's a problem with atheistic evolution: consider a very simple putative organism composed of only 200 integrated and functioning parts, and the problem of deriving that organism by this type of process. The system presumably must have started with only one part and then gradually built itself up over many generations into its 200-part organization. The developing organism, at each successive stage, must itself be integrated and functioning in its environment in order to survive until the next stage. Each successive stage, of course, becomes statistically less likely than the preceding one, since it is far easier for a complex system to break down than to build itself up. A four-component integrated system can more easily "mutate" (that is, somehow suddenly change) into a three-component system (or even a four-component non-functioning system) than into a five-component integrated system. If, at any step in the chain, the system mutates "downward," then it is either destroyed altogether or else moves backward, in an evolutionary sense. Therefore, the successful production of a 200-component functioning organism requires,"at least, 200 successive, successful such "mutations," each of which is highly unlikely. Elementary statistical theory shows that the probability of 200 successive mutations being successful is then (")200, or one chance out of 1060. The number 1060, if written out, would be "one" followed by sixty "zeros." In other words, the chance that a 200-component organism could be formed by mutation and natural selection is less than one chance out of a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion. Also, in a book called the anthropic cosmological principal, 2 great scientists barrow and tippler calculate the probability of evolution occurring, they lay out ten steps that human evolution would need to have gone through in order to bring about modern man as we know him each of these steps are so improbable that even before it could ever possibly occur our sun would have burnt out and ceased to exist, and in the process it would obliterate our planet Earth. In fact, the number that Barrow and Tippler calculate the chance of atheistic, unguided evolution of ever occurring in the human genome to be somewhere between the values of: 4^-180^110 000 and 4^-380^110 000. (Barrow & Tippler, 1988: 566) The odds of evolution occurring without a higher power is as crazy as to be fantastic Evolution is irrelevant to the truth of Christian theism. Saint augustine, 300Ad, on his commentary on genesis pointed at that the creation as mentioned in genesis don't have to be literal. And thay interpretation came 1500 years before the theory of darwin. Evolution is simply irrelevant to the truth of Christian theism The third argument im gonna use, is the argument from the resurrection of jesus. If we can prove that jesus was raised from the death, we can know God. Exists, the resurrection implies miracle and mitacles imply God. Four minimal facts pass the historical test, by every reputable new testament historian, and I believe that the best explanation for these facts is the hypothesis "god raised jesus from the death" and those historical facts are: - Jesus was buried by Joseph of Armathia after his crucifixion - Jesus tomb was found empty by a group of his women followers the Sunday after his crucifixion - Multiple apparitions of jesus alive after his death, not only to his disciples but to skeptics and even enemies. - Jewish disciples came to genuinely believe in the resurrection despite having every disposition of it. (The Jewish theology prohibits a dying messiah, disciples were willing to get persecuted and go to hell) There is no plausible naturalistic explanation for these historical facts. The theories that jesus wasn't really dead when he was buried, or that the disciples and paul (who was an enemy) , or that people have stolen the empty tomb are rejected universally. So the only plausible explanation is the hypothesis "god raised jesus from the death"