Gun Control

"My opponent is still upset that he has tied in his last debate. Lol. If it makes you feel better then I am sorry but you did lack alot of facts. Witch is why were her" First of all, atrocious spelling. My opponent should lose spelling and grammar for that. Second of all, I am now in the lead. Third of all lack of facts have nothing to do with conduct, spelling, or grammar and that is a FACT. That aside I move on to rebuttals. "Today it might be limits on guns and tomorrow our rights might be gone forever because you want to tweak just a bit. " First of all, as my opponent has criticized me for not using facts, he is not using facts. You cannot prove that gun control will lead to taking away other rights. I am not suggesting to remove rights completely (I really don't know where my opponent got this conclusion) rather, as I said, I am just saying that there should be limits to gun control. "You also said that freedom of religion should have limits and controls. Did you know that evolution is a religion. Hitler lived by a code and a list. Hitler loved Darwin's theory evolution book. He read it all the time and lived by it. At the top of Hitler's list was arian (blond hair and blue eyes) at the bottom was Jews and then blacks. This is not the only reason he did what he did but is was the backbone to the whole movement. He believed that he and more like him were more evolved than Jews and blacks. " I was just stating an example and you should not analyze it that much. Anyway, your logic is screwed in this case because the difference is, hitler did not kill Jews and everybody else in the name of evolution. If he did than there needs to be limits on religion. "Look it up if you don't believe me" That's why you should state sources "You also said that the 2nd amendment has killed people. I don't if you have guns or not but I do and every time I walk in my house I never hear them jumping up and shooting. " It doesn't matter if you don't use it for violence and even the majority of people don't kill innocents with guns. It is still an undeniable FACT that gun rights have killed innocent people and my source is the sandy hook elementary shooting. . http://www.huffingtonpost.com... "I am tierd of people saying that guns kill people. People kill people point blank no argument" Once again another example of bad spelling and grammar. Obviously guns can't kill because they are not living but many killings, including in sandy hook elementary, are used with guns. It doesn't matter if there are other means of killing, it is still an undeniable FACT that guns have contributed to murder. "Did you hear about the guy in china that killed all those kids with a knife? Well I have a great idea and I think we should put knife laws into effect so you can go to the store get sliced tomatoes and carrots. . First of all refer to what I said above. Second of all, knifes do other things aside from killing as you said, slicing tomatoes and carrots and a lot less killings have occurred with knives. Third of all my opponent has not stated the source about the China killing (not denying that it happened, just saying). "Or the car wrecks that kill more kids each year than guns. " You can once again refer to what I said above. Second of all, cars have benefits that guns don't have like it is the main way of transportation. Third of all, my opponent has not stated an iota of evidence supporting his claim. In 2011 there 12,664 murders. Out of those kills 8,583 were caused by guns. In England, where there is gun control, there were only 550 kills. Although my opponent is correct that cars kill more than guns, my opponent neglects to mention that cars are much easier to acquire and many deaths occur from drunk driving and negligence of pedestrians and drivers. While drunk driving is ilegal, It is hard to regulate which is why it is still occurring. Source: . http://www.guardian.co.uk... "You said that you love kids so why don't we outlaw cars or put really striker laws on them and lets all go bye horses" No period by my opponent, another example of bad spelling and grammar. Also my opponent is sarcastic and deserves to lose conduct for this. And I have already answered your question why we shouldn't but gun control is a much more legitimate solution than taking away cars. And also, action is being taken. Have you not seen drunk driving commercials. . http://m.youtube.com... . http://m.youtube.com... It is clear that action is being taken.