Global Warming is a hoax

Please note that my opponent have failed to respond to any of my arguments or challenges, I gave him the option to defend and create arguments against different aspects of criticism on Global Warming, and yet. We still have the Co2 weight problem, the thermodynamic laws problem, the water vapor percentage and absorption problem, the history problem, the fraud problem, the corruption problem. Cramming those up objections against the theory and putting them aside, like our friend here did, shows failure to respond and defend. Which brings us to these annoying emotional argument.And you want the Co2 ppm to get lower than this? You do realize plants can't preform photosynthesis with 150-200 Co2 ppm right?http://cdn5.theweedblog.com...I'd say the concentration is quite balanced since there is no gument that the current Co2 concentration is harmful.1-Law of thermodynamics:1- The warm earth surface radiates heat to the cooler atmosphere.2- The cool body (uphysically) re-radiates the heat it got back to the warm body.3- This continuous process's net result causes the warmer body to become warmer.http://www.grc.nasa.gov...The earth is not an isolated system, the earth is not flat. The cooling happens at night, the rate of 240 W/m^2 is not going to change because of 0.000390 Co2. Just bring me one thermodynamic text that mentions "Back/reflected heat radiations", it is impossible for a cooler body to warm the source of it's heat.It is true that all bodies releases radiations, but the earth surface's radiation is 10 times stronger than the atmosphere's radiation. Result: The earth cools, not get 11 times the atmosphere's radiations back.2-Co2 weight: CO2 Mol mass: 44.01 g per Mol CO2 Density: 1.96 KG/m3 Gravity: 1.5189 Air = 28 g per Mol Air Density : 1.2 KG/m3 Gravity: 1 H2O = 18 g per Mol H2O Density : 0.75 kg-m3 Gravity: 0.62 Gravity is almost constant at your everyday heights. What I want to know is how Co2 is going to get down here all the way to the atmosphere. Why do ocean hold the majority of Co2?3-Absorption:http://cosmoscon.files.wordpress.com...Water absorption infrared radiations MUCH more than Co2, how can GW be man-made if such a thing exists?Not to mention that it is 24,400 ppm.I was planning to watch a horror movie soon, but what the hell. I have that article Con copy pasted. *Brings popcorn*===We first kick it off with a temperature lie. Nice try associating a weather extreme to GW, I mean they never existed in the past n'all... Oh wait...The second paragraph is so full of logical fallacies.According to the Overseas Development Institute, Finland was covered by broadleaf forests 6000 years ago. Therefore, I conclude that an increase in 1C is going to fill the earth with forests! Point?The author pretty much admits that Anthropogenic climate change doesn't exist here. And nice of him to point out that this article is solely based on imagination & lala land fantasy.*Fictional Scenario Begins*!Omg! The Amazon flooded! Nature extreme! GLOBAL WARMING!http://dawnontheamazon.com...Oh wait... That is the opposite of the article... Does this mean it is GLOBAL COOLING!http://www.telegraph.co.uk...http://www.guardian.co.uk...1/3 of fresh water will freeze! The end is nigh!I am not too sure about "no return"...http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu...It shrinks and then... Grows right up! Maybe GW is taking breaks?The Polar bears trick is still being used? Wicked.http://meteo.lcd.lu...Who cares about what water absorbs, there is man-made Co2! And wow! I never knew the heat water absorbs become sustainable!Humans sheds 4 kilograms of skins per year! OMG we are dying!Yay! An other Global Warming/Cooling dooms day prophecy!http://www.examiner.com...http://www.philosophical-investigations.org...And by Hadley you mean the center that leaked the climate gate emails?I love how he mentioned Rome. Why just Rome? He wants to band Catholics in order to protect the Vatican or something? lol.Global Warming have none, zero, nada proof. http://icecap.us... Removing 75% of the world’s stations with a clear bias towards removing higher latitude, high altitude and rural locations, all of which had a tendency to be cooler?Tampering with data?http://wattsupwiththat.com...Not cool. (And definitely not hot because of GW)I am not sure the heck that is. But it is not science.Please bring me something useful next time. Thank you!