The Ancient Egyptians were Black (African).

1)My user name does not describe me like what you stated. You guessed correctly. I am 15 and I am part Cherokee NATIVE AMERICAN. Your name is Ethiopia therefore you should know what Ethiopia is and you should know that Ethiopian woman, for the most ethnic groups(Amhara,Oromo, Tigrynia) have straight hair, therefore if there is a mummy with straight hair it does not automatically mean that they are white. These "Black" Egyptians still live in Egypt to this very day. Here are some pictures of this type:http://heavenawaits.files.wordpress.com... http://www.fyicomminc.com... http://members.fortunecity.com... http://mathildasanthropologyblog.files.wordpress.com... http://img.youtube.com... http://media.photobucket.com... And did you not look at this mummy that I gave you in my other speech? http://mathildasanthropologyblog.files.wordpress.com... 2)In response to your counter argument 3, you stated, "I would like to ask my opponent who he thinks the Egyptians race was." Therefore, your argument about the "The mummies are not "Half animal half man" and you have no proof to support this theory" is false. You stated " I would like to ask my opponent who he thinks the Egyptians race was" And your point is? Your still not confronting the fact that your making your self look really bad by saying something like this. Is this a joke or are you serious? None of the mummies are half animal half man so I don't get why you would bring this up if you were not joking. 3)You stated, The Ancient Egyptians were Black (African), therefore, you cannot argue with me about "the majority." Were. Key point. That means all. Defined: was all. It is a given that when I said the resolution it meant the majority and it meant the founders of the civilization were black so don't try that bull crap on me(No offense) If someone says the "Romans were white" its true but obviously they are not saying that 100% were they are saying the ruling class and majority were. There were black slaves, middle eastern and Asian slaves but that does not mean it was not a white civilization. So don't try the "Word game" on me because you know exactly what I'm talking about and don't act like you don't. 4)In response to counter argument 1, I already gave you one, about Zahi Hawass. The ancient Egyptians were not Arabs or Africans. Yes you gave me Zahi Hawass but did you give me The father of history? Have you given me any quotes from the "ANCIENT" historians on their take on the TRUE race of the Egyptians race? I gave you new and old and all you can give me is zahi!LOL! Obviously you don't know much about the topic if that's all you can give me because I can think of a lot of quotes that you could have used on me. I also want to note that zahi contradicts himself when he says that President obama looks like king tut in an interview: http://www.youtube.com... 5)In response to counter argument 2, you never even explained how it relates to the topic. So how was I supposed know what you were saying? Why do I have to explain if you don't know much about Egyptian history in the first place, if you knew you would have read that point and you would know what it meant, if you don't know what the Egyptian stuff meant then you should not have even accepted the challenge. This debate is not for everyone just people who know alot about Egypt. Did you think it would be easy? 6)In response to counter argument 4, you are just being rude, okay? I'm not being rude, I'm speaking the truth whether you like it or not. 7)Recent DNA tests show King Tut was mostly White(99.6%). He was 99.6% Mediterranean. Not white. Mediterranean is a vague term and it can mean white Mediterranean(Italians) middle eastern ones(Turkey) or black ones (North Africans). Also you ignore the fact that he died of sickle cell disease, and you ignore that the mummy looks VERY different from the reconstruction. Zahi Hawass even says that the reconstruction looks nothing like the real king tut. http://en.wikipedia.org... 8)Responding to counter argument 7, the Nubians painted them as dark, but this is an artistic convention stereotyping a nationality, therefore, there were no dark Egyptians at that time. Mhhm. Not reading my speeches again I see.....Those paintings that I gave you were painted by Egyptians! And the Egyptians painted the nubians as dark not vice versa so where are you getting your info from? More paintings:http://www.google.com... http://i.ytimg.com... http://3.bp.blogspot.com... 9)Responding to counter argument 8, I will give you a taste of your own medicine. You stated before, "Read my first speech about 5 times," so, I will tell you, "read my speech about five times." Then you will understand it. That proves nothing. 10)Responding to argument 1, read my counter argument 3. You cant prove that though, and that's all that matters. 11)Are you saying that the worldwide view today is that everyone thinks they aren't black or African? Yes that what I'm saying so you cant give me a yahoo answers thing to prove what you are trying to say. 12)In response to argument 3, read counter argument 1. Not proving. 13)Responding to argument 5, or your last point, you stated, "One point i would lie to make is thatï¿½€ï¿½." You stated, "I would lieï¿½€ï¿½" Lie. Therefore, you are lying when you made that point. You know exactly what I meant so don't try that bull crap on me. 14)Responding to argument 5, where did you get that point? Any sources? I don't need to show you the evidence because it is a common known fact but if you insist I will. Cavelli Sforza: "Genes, Languages, and peoples shows that the taureg Berber of west Africa are most closely related to the indigenous east Africans of the Nile Valley-Specifically the Beja who are known as the Medjay in old Egypt." Taureg most closely related to: a)Beja-135 b)Sudanese-240 c)Amhara-278 d)Tigre-320 e)Cushitic-352 Now do you have any DNA evidence to support the contrary? Arguments 3)anyone who speaks Arabic is considered as an Arab, therefore, the Egyptians are Arabs, not Africans. But you just said that the Egyptians were NOT Arab so now you are contradicting yourself. Voters, the reason why I win is because I have shown the most creditable sources(Ancient,modern scholars). I confronted his one quote, whereas he attempted to do it to only three and failed at doing so while ignoring the Herodotus quote. My opponent has ignored a lot of my points, while I have ignored none and confronted all. For the most part he chose not to show any sources that proved his case. He showed one and it was very weak. I went into depth and showed DNA evidence while he mentioned one thing but never really elaborated on it. I know most of you may not believe that the ancient Egyptians were black, but that's not what this debate is about. Its about who in this debate made the debate more convincing. Thanks