Banning Muslims From Entering U.S.A Is Great Idea

To start off the argument, Con's argument points out the fact that most of these radical Muslim attacks I spoke of are in different countries. But, we are talking about radical Muslims immigrating we are talking about the potential danger they might bring to America and how dangerous they are in general. He than says I just didn't have enough list of radical Muslim terrorist attacks in America, which I can actually give you right now. Here is a big list of radical Muslim attacks since 9/11: http://www.wnd.com... . He than lists Christians attacks, here I can actually say is out of context. Because we are talking about the danger from Muslim radicals not Christian radicals. He completely just focuses on the other side, which doesn't make the danger from Radical Muslims invalid at all. Con claims I admited that the Orlando shooting was assisted, despite me debunking the theory and showing how it could have easily been done by a single man. I don't remember saying this, I even checked to make sure I said this and couldn't find anything, so Con's argument is false. Con: " In para- 3- PRO is saying "Orlando shooting may have been a combined but then also the shooter was a RADICAL MUSLIM. " " He yet again says I'm only listing Orlando Shooting, despite in my same argument putting up multiple different cases of Muslim attacks. He than continues with his conspiracy theory that has no facts. Con than says " Concrete facts would be found by one reading the given source that the shooter was assisted heavily. ", But con doesn't quote the evidence, I couldn't find any facts when I read through it. In the video there is only one gun that can be heard being fired, so how could it be more shooters? He than says there are no proof ISIS was involved with the attack, now I will bring up a source that Con used many times. And that is the FBI and VOX. Omar pledged his alliance with ISIS, so he was inspired by ISIS to do the horrific shooting. Con than reply to my statement about how the theory never proves that there were more people. Con says there was, but never shows us any quotes that proves it. Con says that the family immigrated in 1980, but in my defense Orlando was only one case of radical Muslim attacks, but it did show the affect of what ISIS has on Muslims. Now the family got here early, but we can still stop any radicals from coming in, in 2016. To prevent more of these attacks. Con says the media is indeed lying because they are focusing on one person and not the whole issue. First of all it wasn't a fact second of all you didn't prove they were lying. He than says Obama and Hillary are hinting that it may of been a inside job, this doesn't prove that it was a inside job. Con than makes a straw man fallacy, saying that I'm okay with mass shootings as-long as Muslims don't do it. First of all I never said this, he just says false things to make my argument easier to attack. The thing is people still died and there is a solution to it. He than says it wasn't false that Christians kill 149 and Muslims only 49, but I already showed Muslims did kill more people than just 49. He than says me talking about radical Muslims killing in other country is out of context. This is false because we were talking about the danger of radical Muslims, and we are talking about them coming here. So it's okay to talk about their danger in general. He than says the Orlando shooting is still being debated if it was religious or not, but like I said he pledged himself to ISIS before doing the attack. And he than yet again says false things saying it's the only radical Muslim attack I speak of, but I already showed multiple different radical Muslim attacks. He than questions why the shooter choose a gay club, well he pledged himself to ISIS and the Qua-ran is against homosexuals. I think it was obvious it was religious. Con can't prove that the Christian attacks are religious, but the radical Muslim are. So that allows us to look at the Islam religion and do the ban. Because the Qua-ran is against homosexuals. If there's no connection between the religion and the mass shooters than we can't just blame the religion, but here there clearly is when it comes down with Islam. Con makes a other straw man saying I don't know what a conspiracy theory is. He says that the Orlando shooting was done by two people and is not a conspiracy theory because it had " solid evidence ". Con yet again doesn't quote what evidence this was, but I have yet to find any evidence in the article that makes the conspiracy theory a fact. Could con please quote the evidence from the article? Point 4: 1. I already talked about this. 2. Yes, but that was just one of them. So it really is just nip-picking as it doesn't really make the other sources I showed invalid at all. 3. I did give recent attacks, about 10,125 killed. 4- In his fourth point I can't really make out what he was trying to say or what he was replying too, Con should be more clear. But he said it's from his first argument and I can't find anything from the first argument. 5- I already argued against this. POINT-5 response: He responds to me saying we can't really kick out Christians, he also says we could just take other security measure. What other security measures? POINT-6 response: He says that he already said it wasn't a conspiracy theory and other organization were involved, first of all there is no evidence to prove it and Con never quotes the evidence. POINT-7-para-1 Response: Con says I am lying as American only experienced 132 shooting, first of all this is in America and I was talking about in general. He than ask for the number of shootings, well I gave you how much they killed in general. POINT-7-para-2 Response: He than says " PRO says that mass shootings are happening because of Muslims " , I think I worded this the wrong way. I was trying to say there are radical Muslims doing mass shootings and attacks, I wasn't saying all of the mass shootings and attacks are caused by radical Muslims. POINT-7-para-3: Con responds to calling out him saying that Muslims have only killed 37 since 9/11. This is false because of Orlando, which had 49 killed. Also this is America, and we are talking about Radical Islam threat coming to America. So we can talk about the general, which is 194,092 killed in Islam terror attacks since 9/11, in my sources you can see it get worse and worse. Con than says that 80 percent of terrorism in America is done by U.S citizen and 20 percent by immigrants. This is the same thing what he did with Christians, he went out of context and started talking about a other terrorism group which didn't make the threat of radical Muslims invalid at all. He responds to my comment about me saying that his source that the Orlando Shooting was a inside job was a conspiracy theory, he responded to me by saying " PRO is such a RIDICULOUS person VOTERS. ". He was very unprofessional and made a fallacy by targeting me directly instead of my argument. Also I didn't need any source, because the source for your info is right in front of me and has not enough evidence to prove that it was a inside job, Con never quotes any evidence from his source. So therefore we can see it as a conspiracy theory from it's lack of evidence. He proves this by saying the University Of North California saying 37 people were killed since 9/11, his source is from a article from 2015 before Orlando shooting. His next argument is that any idea is bad if it has more cons than pros. Well it matters how powerful the cons and pros are. He keeps talking about America and talks out of context talking about Christianity, so we can skip that as we already argued against it. He than says I said Muslims come here to work, but here let me ask you something voter. What is more important people's life? Or someone not being able to come to America to work, there are still other third world countries left like Europe. NOTE: To clarify about me talking about general, Muslims coming here raises the potential for attacks because they were already attacking in different countries and doing terror attacks. So they could still come here and do more terror attacks. Also he than talks about how easy Muslims could come here with a fake passport or country on there. Here's a easy solution, how does he come to America? We can kick him out if he comes from a airport in Islam, and also Trump said we would be doing profiling to stop this. IN RESPONSE TO ONE KILLED A YEAR ARGUMENT: Also it's more than just ONE life to save, look at Orlando shooting. And look at what they did in other countries. Also you do know planning a attack probably takes years to get all the weapons and ammo, so when they are finished prepping they do a major terror attack that kills many. Ar-15 is 949 dollars and 10 ammo clips are 190 dollars, he also had a glock which is 500 dollars. So in total(excluding the bullets) it's about 1639 dollars you have to save up. And Omar was a security guard, his yearly wage is probably $25,752-$33,389. So in conclusion on why not to vote for Con: Con was very unprofessional, he made logical fallacies, and he said things that were out of context. Sources: https://www.thereligionofpeace.com... http://www.glockstore.com... http://www1.salary.com... https://www.stagarms.com... http://yournewswire.com... https://www.thereligionofpeace.com... http://www.vox.com...