Creationism vs big-bang/evolution Pro for bb/e Con for creation

This debate has nothing to do with the two ideas coe existing. You accepted to bring proof and facts to the table why creationism A: makes more sense and is more logical than the latter or B: evolution does not work and the big bang is not plausable. This is not the maybe game its the "which facts are more likely to be true" game. (Un-biased of course) The big bang was an explosion of time and space. It was spontaeneous. BUT what you creationists may or may not understand, is that We don't know why it happened (yet) but we know how, on a limited scale. The big bang had eight eras. The planck era lasted about 1/10 of a second. In this tenth of a second the four fundemental forces of nature(gravity, weak force, strong force and electromagnetism) combined to then explode once again separating them for good . The natural forces separation started the GUT era, this is the order they separated in. Gravity, strong and weak force and then of course electro magnetism was left. The electro weak era started a tenth of a second after gut. This era explains that the strong and weak forces decoupled here and caused a rapid explosion of space called inflation. This would in turn expand the universe. The next era using the strong and weak force, quarks, anti-matter, atoms and more began here. The second and first laws of thermodynamics not only are the reason why this can happen it also is the reason that some day our universe will reach absolute entropy where all matter is energy. HOWEVER the second law of thermodynamics allows for such entropy it does not hinder evolution in the slightest and it has no effect on the evolutionary observation at all. This means that the argument of thermodynamics hinders evolution is false. More info here http://www.skyandtelescope.com... The laws of science that have been proven and have been tested show that the big bang is plausable if not fact. To further on it is possible to assume that energy came from a past universe that has reached complete entropy. Its a logical assumption of a creationist to say that "Thermo dynamics can make God an option" I will answer with "If he was made of energy than it is possible but for all we know he is an etheral being not supported by the ten dimensions of space and time." Bug i do not think he exists so that is just a bit pointless. Your argument has a few flaws in it so I will ask now: If you assume there was absolutely nothing then how can your god become god? Also you and I and the rest of us can not fathom the empty-ness and soul rending void of black or not evn color that is nothing. Thats why assuming that the god particle that is the higgs boson (found as of 2012) is one of the things we can say existed in place of nothing. In a sense the nothing argument does not work because yoh can say god was there. And I could say the higgs boson was. Nothing is impossible. To move on to evolution now. I would advise you after this read to research the fleshed out definition of scientific theory. Evolution and creationism can not coe exist because they and their respective proccesses are completely different for the other and cannot be compared. They can only be argued. First off the definition of scientific theory is an idea that is tested tried and is in observation. Our definition of evolution alone changes every decade or so because it is still in observation. If you remember grade school you will know that there are stages to a scientific theory. To answer your question on "How can life evolve from non-living matter" I advise you research A-biogenesis or the study and theorem of living matter evolving from a non living natural substance. The idea of the first protean or proteans evolving to multi-cellular organic beings and creatures is evolution at its heart. This is a source on a small tid-bit of abiogenesis http://www.britannica.com... The rest of this arguement is personal oppinion and I cant interperate gods thoughts because I have a lack of a beleif in god. "As for evolution i don't see why creationism and evolution can't coexist too! If god is all powerful why cant he make the creatures of the earth evolve. He is god for Pete's sake if he wants to change the creatures he has created there is nothing to stop him from doing it! Also in l the bible it says that god created the world in like a week (sorry i don't feel like finding a quote I think it is in Genesis). The bible can be interpreted in many ways and it is my opinion that a week for God might be a lot longer than a week for humans. maybe every day for god is billions of years long. Also if god can evolve animals maybe he really did use monkeys to make man! lol" Sources http://www.notjustatheory.com... http://www.skyandtelescope.com... http://www.britannica.com... In this special case wikipedia sources are credible but have to be reveiwed by the voter if they think it is credible https://en.m.wikipedia.org...