4th DDO Census Debate: Trump v Clinton

This round I shall be defending my case, as my opponent did in his previous round, this will include C4 since it is part of my Opening Arguments.Unlike my opponent's claims, I have easily provided cases for Hillary, he just fails to see it as I add it in constantly with the bombardments on Trump, though it may not be as obvious. As much as I dislike both politicians and really don't think either of them should be president as a personal opinion, Hillary is obviously the better choice.Contention 1: Immigration and DeportationMy opponent claims that they are doing bad things like taking our jobs, but the thing is, they are taking jobs that no one actually wants to do, from farmhands to maids/buttlers. We also have to remember, unlike Trump's claim, they are sending some really good people as 34% of software engineers, 44% Medical scientists, and 25% chemists [1]. We want to deport these people? Do you know what this would do to a vast majority of America? Getting rid of almost half of our Medical scientists is something that will significantly harm our nation. If anything, we should ennact Hillary's plan and grant them anmesty as not only are they working, but their work is benefitting all Americans, no matter who you are. My opponent claims that illegal immigrants don't pay taxes, but that's absurb. The National Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy has reported that in this past year, illegal immigrants have paid over $11 billion [2]. I don't know about you, but that's a huge amount of taxes that we would be getting rid of. If you actually go to this source, you'll see it has an interactive map on how much taxation was paid by them. They have also reported that Obama's executive action has lead to an increase in local taxes profit by $805 million. My opponent states that this is not a lot, but we do still have to realize that they accounted for that much of our growth is still a huge aspect. If you get rid of that our growth would have lost $698,809,333,333 [3]. That is a huge loss for the US that would have occured. My opponent can downplay these numbers all he wants, but you can't defy simple statistics. My opponent harps on American jobs with the unemployment, but we still have to see that the US would have lost $700 billion if this would have occured. That is appalling.My opponent is simply doing incorrect math here. Illegal immigrants are sending $63 billion home, but they are adding $700 billion to our GDP and they are paying $11 billion in taxes. These numbers completely trump my opponents arguments. Even if that's the case. We can see that the US is one of Mexicos top trading partners and they can easily be purchasing American made products leading to more American jobs based on the increased demand on the foreign market for American products. If you take this away, outside of all the other bad effects I've already mentioned, but we would see a loss of American jobs as these Latinos would be unable to purchase as much American products as they would have less money to purchase them with. My opponent wants to talk about how Trump's taxes will increase wages by that much, but let's look at some other effects of it, like the decrease of national income by $12 trillion. With the ballooning of interest on debt as well as our Social Program, the US deficet will skyrocket [4]. This isn't fixing the issue, it's making it worse. Hillary may lower wages by 0.9%, but we are able to actually come close to paying all of our bills compared to Trump where we are destroying our economy, paying for more projects than ever, and loosing income to pay for it all [5]. That's not fixing the problem, that's making it worse, while Hillary solves for taxes. Either way, my opponent has dropped this argument, so please extend it across. Though Trump may has talked about compramise, we can't ignore that his plan will cost our GDP over a trillion dollars and will plunge our economy into a Depression. This argument has a huge Impact in this debate and it has been dropped. This is a huge economic depression that could wreck our economy and Trump would lead the charge off the Fiscal cliff and make America poor again. Hillary, will help us by granting amnesty.Contention 2: Clinton the UnifierMy opponent claims that this statement is false, but even if that's even remotely true, which it's not. We can see that Trump is stereotyping all Mexicans, legal and not, that they are all villianous people. Hell, there are people who are getting brainwashed by this propaganda that he is throwing out there. As much or whatever my opponent wants to spin this, Trump is causing these riots happening through his hateful speeches. Even if they are Bernie supporters, things like this wouldn't be happening if Trump wasn't such a demagogue. My opponent has discarded my study saying it's untopical, but it's a legittamate study contrary to whatever my opponent believes as it help shows, without the political aspect, that this does occur. You have to accept my scientific study in this debate as it's political neutral in this case. Trump has caused these issues and there is no doubt that this is true. Does this happen at Clinton rallies? The answer is no. Why? It's because she's not a hateful bigot just saying terrible things just to get people on board, though he has no idea what he's talking about. I mean what do you call Trump thanking the Orlando Shooter and patting himself on the back after the shooting? Do we really want someone who ignores the people killed just for his own agenda? My opponent is miscontrewing the data that I provided. My opponent talks about Muslim American support increasing things about Islamic Extremism in the US, but no where in the study or what my opponent is talking about saying anything about surveillance in Muslim American Neighborhoods and Mosques. My study has shown that not only does it not work, but it's unconstitutional. My opponent has dropped this argument, please extend it across in this debate.Contention 3: Domestic PolicyMy opponent talks about how Trump is grilled by the media and this somehow makes him more open. This is absolutely false. Trump has only stated in stone that he talks about just a few issues, 7 on his website. This shows he has some sort of a hidden agenda. Donald Trump has banned the Washington Post for their coverage of him [6]. I would like to remind you that Richard Nixon was the only US President to ban them. It goes to show you just how corrupt Trump is. Indeed it would harm jobs, but we do have to remember that abolishing the minimum wage and leaving it to red states would harm all Americans. This point was agreed to by my opponent, he also dropped how Trump has flipped flopped on this issue and certainly he is even arguing it here in this debate. Even if Clinton changed her's in the 2000, Trump changed his 3 times in three hours. Do we want a Presidnet who can't actually make up his mind on the issue. My opponent has also dropped the Trump comment on Punishing women for getting an abortion. Not just late term, but any abortion at all. I have absolutely no idea what my opponent is talking about here. In the Court Case DC V Heller, Late SCOTUS Justice Scalia on page 53-54 of his ruling claimed that there can be limitations in the Right to bare arms. Meaning that Congress can Constituionally create Gun Control [7]. This is from the most Conservative Judge that was on the SCOTUS. My opponent's case is simply a farse. Please extend my arguments. Contention 4: Leadership TrumpsMy opponent is incorrect, these comments were made when she was running against Obama. This can still hold true through today as my opponent's claim is incorrect here. Trump has made some outragous comments on the military and many military groups had selected Clinton over him. Overall, Veterans support Trump, but only by a slim, very slim lead, while in many other elections, the Veterans had a significant lead of the GOP over the Democrats. This just shows how bad Trump is. I've already refuted much on immigration, so please extend that from C1. My opponent claims that Trump is the best negotiated, but I guess that's what we get from a man who has faced several bankruptcies, Trump University being a failure, and Eminet Domain, it seems like failure and force to me.Sources1. (http://tinyurl.com...) 2. (http://tinyurl.com...) 3. (http://tinyurl.com...) 4. (http://tinyurl.com...) 5. (http://tinyurl.com...) 6. (http://tinyurl.com...) 7. (http://tinyurl.com...)