Batman defeats Spiderman

Here is my rebuttal:A) "This is a battle, this does not matter if they would or not fight"This has not been defined as a battle in round 1. I refuse to accept any post-hoc definitions. Round 1 states: "Batman would surely beat Spidey with or without preparation time"This is an absolute statement and is open to debate on ALL levels not ruled out by the initial resolution. Batman would NOT "surely beat Spidey" if the two do not fight. Your resolution is disproved. Don't blame me for your sloppy resolution, if you please. B) "The Spider Man and Superboy match is non canon at all"Firstly, FALSE. Marvel lists the world of "DC vs. Marvel" as Earth-9602 (see: . http://talkingcomicbooks.com... or . http://en.wikipedia.org... ), meaning it is NOT "non canon at all". Secondly: Irrelevant. You wish to stage a fight between Batman and Spider-Man that never happened nor would ever happen, so you accept non-canon material as a premise. Besides, DC Universe CEASED to exist with the New 52. C) "the comparison between Batman and Green Goblin is ridiculous""Spider-Man already has some experience in fighting strategic, gadget-oriented opponents, as his main enemy is the Green Goblin, who possesses a similar style of fighting compared to Batman. ". http://en.wikipedia.org...I came up with that comparison by myself. Now that you questioned it, I found this. So, the more experienced geeks at "Death Battle", a well-researched webseries beloved by many fans, agree with me that this comparison is anything but ridiculous. I listed the similarities above. The Batman never uses exploding Batarangs against anyone they would kill, as he doesn't kill. The Goblin uses a large arsenal of different weapons, most of which resemble those of Batman:. http://www.thegreengoblinshideout.com...http://en.wikipedia.org...Note the use of smoke pellets by Batman. You do not even know your material. D) "Only a simple hit of Batman's explosive Batarang and Spiderman is done for"Spider-Man's Spider-sense is well known. From the official Marvel site: "His spider-sense provides an early warning detection system linked with his superhuman kinesthetics, enabling him the ability to evade most any injury, provided he doesn't cognitively override the autonomic reflexes. " from: . http://marvel.com...(Peter_Parker) #ixzz3Jwc7CbXsBatman can thus never hit Spider-Man. E) "Doomsday clones"This happened in Superman/Batman 10, in 2004. "Darkseid attempted to replicate Doomsday, producing an army of Doomsday "clones". Darkseid was not able to duplicate perfectly the creature in all its raw power, and they were defeated by a combination of heat vision and Batman's explosive batarangs during an attack on Paradise Island, while Darkseid kidnapped the newly arrived Kara Zor-El/Supergirl. " from: . http://en.wikipedia.org...So, it wasn't Batman, it was Superman with Batman's help who TOGETHER defeated a mindless, DEFECTIVE army of clones. Do your research properly, next time. F) If we want to take the movies into this, the Goblin threw multiple sharp objects (much like Batarangs), and 1 bomb exploded into Spidey's face. The movie Spider-Man is easily the weakest Spider-Man of all, but even HE recovered from the blast and defeated his enemies. All of them. So, this only gets to show that he can overcome explosive Batarangs. But there was no Spider-Sense in that scene, because the Raimi-directed movies follow their own mythology, where Spidey doesn't even have his web-shooters. G) Spider-Man's strengthSpider-Man lifted an ENTIRE SKYSCRAPER in 1999: . http://static.comicvine.com...http://www.chasingamazingblog.com...Far superior to anything Batman can ever dream of. H) Defeated opponentsAGAIN: Those opponents who are physically stronger than Spidey lack his brilliant mind and Spider-Sense. That combination makes Spider-Man far superior. And since you come up with "Tower of Babel": That doesn't say ANYTHING for this debate. In that story, all of the Justice are defeated (rather delayed for a few hours, as they recover and defeat the bad guys, showing just how "well" Batman's plans work) by the villains with STRATEGIES Batman has PREPARED well ahead. Now, round 1 states: "Batman would surely beat Spidey with or without preparation time. " But in "Tower of Babel" it was the VILLAINS, not Batman, and they had a LOT of preparation time. So, this story tells us nothing on how Batman would ever beat Spider-Man without preparation time. Again, no evidence exists to the contrary of my assertions. Batman and Spider-Man would never fight, and if they did, Batman would have nothing to beat Spider-Man who has often defeated the even more powerful Green Goblin. This debate is over.