There is evidence for Noah's flood narrative

What snopes.com fails to point out is that there are no sources given to back up their claims. The claim is that qualified scientists have been independently consulted about this gadget, which is generally advertised in treasure-hunting magazines, not scientific journals. They are unanimous that there are no scientific principles employed. Indeed, two of these scientists built and tested working models." No sources, names of scientists, etc. were given to back up their claims. Ron Wyatt used a device he called "Molecular frequency generator." Although this would appear to be fake, according to Mary Wyatt's site (1), this device has been verified to be professional. Terry Johnson is the electrical engineer who tested this device and explained how it works and Cochran and Associates bowling green, Ky manufactured it. It costs $6500. Ray Brubaker asked an electrical engineer in 1988 to research about Ron Wyatt's device and wrote the following: "The device is essentially a frequency generator (Ron's first was a HeathKit) that is linked with a frequency counter - this enables the user to set different frequencies for the different types of metal the user wishes to locate. The signal is then amplified and propagated electromagnetically through the ground." This was also used by H.G heranimus. There are several objections presented to discredit this finding, however, according to pilgrimpromo.com, a newsletter presents scientific analysis to confirm it's validity (2). According to NATO survey of the site in the 1950's, it is claimed "...this particular boat-shape is far from unique. The Turkish Air Force released another photograph several years ago showing three similar boat-shapes in the mudflow material on the footslopes of nearby Lesser Mount Ararat." Every inch was scanned at high altitude, thus it could be determined if missiles moved from the Soviet and Russian base to the current area by examining current photos with earlier ones. Dr. Arthur Brandenburger, a geophysicist of Los Alamos national lab.s in new Mexico said ""I have no doubt at all that the object is a ship. In my entire career I have never seen an object like this in a stereo photo" (Rene Noorbergen's "The Ark file). Brandenburger and his team surveyed the site again and he said: "We feel the formation is quite unique. There's several formations that have a superficially similar shape and we've investigated several of them. And they, uh, as we investigate them, we find they do not have the special characteristics we find in the site we've been focusing on.." According to the Christian broadcast network, Brandenburger was able to confirm that there was a man-made structure under ground: "...Using a metal detector, Baumgardner has been able to confirm the existence of metal at regular intervals." It's also claimed that the metal readings were random. In the newspaper article "Noah's Ark found?" The reporter wrote: "Showing aerial slides which showed a striking boat-like shape, Baumgardner noted the Americans found an organized pattern of metal at the 6,300 foot elevation site with the aid of metal detectors. 'For me, it was quite an amazing discovery to find the pattern of metal..' A video tape of the 1985 field expeditions including David fasold, Ron Wyatt, and Brandenburger himself using the metal detector and confirming that there was a man-made structure. According to the article "Archaeologist is certain he's found the ark" on August 3,1986, Apendix H says that GSSI sent out information packets interested in the sub-surface radar scanners. The article also says: "Although Rosetta would not reveal his opinion about Wyatt's claim, he said of the buried object, ~You'd never see anything like that in natural geology....Some human made this structure, whatever it is." Another ad of GSSI radar says: "GSSI systems have traveled to Egypt to search for underground tombs 4,000 years old, to Turkey to locate the true resting place of Noah's Ark, and to the Arabian peninsula to find the site of an ancient city that was a spice-trading center.." Joe Rosetta writes: "This data is not, does not represent natural geology- its a man-made structure. These reflections are occurring very periodic, too periodic to be random natural-type interfaces." It is also claimed that the rivets are basalt. According to a lab report by Teledyne Allvac, the paragraph reads: "It is interesting to note that location 1 (presumably fossilized timber members) was found to contain much higher carbon (- 1.9%) than location 2 (presumably fossilized metal)." A sample was taken from the actual rivet and tested twice, showing carbon content around .14 and 13.% and another sample was taken around the metal having carbon content of 1.88-1.97% in 2 tests. This is 15 times more carbon than the 1 cm adjacent to it. It's claimed that numerous of scientists examined the anchor stones and discovered them to be made by the Armenians, however no names and no evidence was given to verify this claim. In a video, ultraviolet paint was used to photograph the cracks not visible to the human eye. Kodak of Rochester sent complete information on the procedure. The team used a special light for viewing the stones with ultraviolet sensitive liquid on the stones. Egyptiologists have used this process when checking for earlier inscriptions on ancient Egyptian monuments. The liquid seeps into microscopic cracks. No evidence showed that there was an earlier defacement as skeptics claim. One of the Anchorstones Ron found partially buried in the earth is becoming visible. There are 3 of these in existence and none have crosses inscribed on them with holes at the top of them. This is evidence that the Armenians did not fabricate these stones. The crosses engraved on these stones are of Byzantine and Crusader markings. The upright stone in the village of Kazan has more than 8 crosses on it. When they are examined closely, the crosses were engraved at a later date as the algae isn't growing on these later crosses as it does with the original ones. Dr. Baumgardner and Bayraktutan have attempted to prove that this site wasn't Noah's ark, however according to one of his newsletters, it says "Another notable discovery was the presence at three locations in the mudflow layer of nodules of the bright yellow mineral limonite. Limonite is a hydrated oxide of iron, and its occurrence in this environment appears to be anomalous. Just how anomalous is the crucial question, since the minerals in the rocks in the source area of the mudflow have a moderate iron content. However, during the months now that I have worked at the site, I have never seen this bright yellow material anywhere in the fissures or exposures in the mudflow clay. Because earlier investigations led us to suspect unusual amounts of iron in the site, these occurrences of limonite are of special interest as they could represent the rusted remains of metallic iron objects." Sources & Links: 1. http://www.anchorstone.com...) 2. http://www.pilgrimpromo.com...