It is required that god be ousted from power due to his violent, evil and hateful ways and behaviors

My so-called opponent with an obvious ticker tape parade and his smug smile as all christians have, doesn’t get that his entire bible is a major contradiction in its own right as there are at least 1,000 contradictions in it alone with quite a few lies in it as well, thus making it unreadable. But as stated before no supreme deity would ever communicate in text form, the worst form of communication possible. OK fine then don’t prove me wrong. Then the verses are to be taken as they are, literally btw, so then that means that I am right and so are those that knowingly study the bible and not my opponent who clearly does not study the bible, he just bluffs his way onto center stage, as I posted the verses in round III which showed verses of children clearly suffering for no reason at all. Sick, disgusting, perverted, horrific, unpleasant, shocking indeed, and knowingly causing the suffering to innocent children, and sometimes showing the suffering of babies and women. Thus that right there shows the absolute incompetence of god and all he is is a worthless slice of toxic bile that is required to be ousted from his granny fart positioning and the sooner the better. Now what are verses like those doing in any bible? What do they prove?Only a select group of dwindling christians think as my opponent does. Is it any blunder why christianity is failing drastically worldwide since 2007? Nope. NEWSFLASH: Its because of doomed failures like my opponent. My opponent thinks he back-doored me with chapters so he could out-do the coughed up diseased verses as stated. Well really? According to what? Him? How would he know? What grade of rainbow delight farm instagram fairy tell signs in his happy hairy hard off head did he come up with these ideals BEFORE I posted the verses? He must be king-Arab-toilet-dust-super-hero who paints smiley faces on black holes as his super powers. In fact, my lovely brides maid sing-a-long doesn’t know his bible at all in which is so oblivious to all of mankind hairy ape syndrome. * Now supposed he’s right for a single quadrillionth of a second, well gosh golly gee, when stripped down, the hate, evil, pain and suffering in those verses that my opponent DID NOT LOOK UP and he knows it, is all shimmering and bright and still there. Round III goes to me. Especially especially especially considering the fact that my opponent does not and cannot even contemplate what child abuse is. Oh but YOUR god can and does. “God has killed people for no reason, without offering any support for his reasoning.” What an utterly stupid statement that could have only been stated by a child obviously still in high school. Hey stupid, you answered the question. Duh. NEXT:“He assumes that by repeating this position over and over again,...” Yes, the hatred of god needs to be repeated over and over again. Duh. Um what is the title of this debate? But I get it, you are still in high school with an obvious and seriously stunted and dimwitted high school edumacation and intelligence and wow does it show. If you do it again, and I am sure you will, your entire argument for round II will be ignored and I will move on to gays and rape. Got it blah blah black sheep who cannot possibly have any genuine friends or loved ones? Then you make the erroneous statement of “God is not a person who would embrace killing innocent humans for no reason, especially since he loves everyone.” Prove god loves everyone. Chapters and verses only please. In truth I hope that you find them,well actually I have shown you that your god in your bible in fact does not love everyone. So that’s a contradiction and a major contradiction at that. So indeed my poor little lost sheep, you do not know your bible AT ALL to make such a stupid statement. Citing verses from your bible IS evidence you dimwit cow dung larvae.“However, he fails to understand the context in which they were given.” Oh really? According to what imbecile? You? How would you know? What grade of dumpster diving hamster se’habla espanol have you graduated from to make such interpretations from? “In verse 8 of this chapter, we read: "And when Asa heard these words, and the prophecy of Oded the prophet, he took courage, and put away the abominable idols out of all the land of Judah and Benjamin, and out of the cities which he had taken from mount Ephraim, and renewed the altar of the Lord, that was before the porch of the Lord."” “This shows that the city was not full of innocent people, as my opponent is speculating.” Sorry, those people were innocent to have that much hate directed at them. Period and especially towards children you total piece of trash. As stated YOUR god could have easily thought of a peaceful solution. But no he loves hate. Oh but wait, you just got caught and proved wrong. Your god does not love everyone now does he? Not by a long shot. * I win round II because YOUR god could have easily thought of a peaceful solution rather than all of this hate. All you’ve provided was showing this hate that your god provided. Let’s move onto gays and more hate…Here’s why text is always a bad idea within your bible and god transmitter...KJVIf a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.AMPIf a man lies [intimately] with a male as if he were a woman, both men have committed a detestable (perverse, unnatural) act; they shall most certainly be put to death; their blood is on them.AMPCIf a man lies with a male as if he were a woman, both men have committed an offense (something perverse, unnatural, abhorrent, and detestable); they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.“If a man lies with a male as if he were a woman,” Notice how this version is digging into the transgender issue? And then it goes way way way way overboard with its thesaurus digging ins of “offense (something perverse, unnatural, abhorrent, and detestable);” I mean how does this version know that its translation is EXACTLY right? CEBIf a man has sexual intercourse with a man as he would with a woman, the two of them have done something detestable. They must be executed; their blood is on their own heads.“If a man has sexual intercourse with a man as he would with a woman, the two of them have done something detestable.” Completely and totally 100% different from “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: “ And then the CEB continues “They must be executed;” Here we go with the thesaurus issue “they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”CEVIt’s disgusting for men to have sex with one another, and those who do will be put to death, just as they deserve.ERV“If a man has sexual relations with another man as with a woman, they have committed a terrible sin. They must be put to death. They are responsible for their own death.EXBIf a man ·has sexual relations [LR39;lies] with another man as a man does with a woman, these two men have ·done a hateful sin [committed an abomination]. They must be put to death. They have brought ·it [blood] on themselves [18:22].A hateful sin? GWWhen a man has sexual intercourse with another man as with a woman, both men are doing something disgusting and must be put to death. They deserve to die.Well well well well this has 0 to do with the KJV. “both men are doing something disgusting”? “They deserve to die?” Hmmm a Cannibal Corpse song? Oh that’s a good one.ICB“‘A man might have physical relations with another man as a man does with a woman. If he does, these two men have done a hated sin. They must be put to death. They have brought it on themselves.“‘A man might have physical relations” MIGHT? And notice how neatly “They have brought it on themselves.” is tacked on which has NOTHING to do with any other version? Hmmmm. TLBThe penalty for homosexual acts is death to both parties. They have brought it upon themselves.Ah yes, NOTHING whatsoever to do with the KJV. Nothing. MSG“If a man has sex with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is abhorrent. They must be put to death; they are responsible for their own deaths.Using the thesaurus again? NASBIf there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.detestable? Bloodguiltness? Why do bible’s go-out-of-their-way to be confusing and thus use terms from the thesaurus? Why not use the original terminology? NIRVSuppose a man has sex with another man as he would have sex with a woman. I hate what they have done. They must be put to death. Anything that happens to them will be their own fault.”I hate what they have done.” WHAT? What does that have that have ANYTHING to do with anything? “Anything that happens to them will be their own fault.” Kind of ad libbing there just a bit huh?NLVIf a man lies with a male as if he were a woman, both of them have done a very sinful act. They must be put to death. They will suffer for their own sin.“They will suffer…” more terminology. NLT“If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense.“They are guilty of a capital offense.”? Wow. So raping a 6 year old girl has the same value or less than homosexuality in their book? Oh and oh yeah, they also use the term “homosexuality’. WYCIf a man sleepeth with a man, by lechery of a woman, ever either hath wrought unleaveful thing, die they by death; their blood be on them. (If a man sleepeth with a man, like in fleshly coupling with a woman, they both have done an unlawful thing, and they both shall be put to death; their blood be on them.)Se habla Espanol? Continued in the comments section