God exist, and belief in His existence is rationally justified.

2ndLawofTD: Con "Now CalTech Cosmologist Sean Carrol offers an interesting idea. What if there is no thermodynamic equilibrium?" 1.) This does not answer or prove anything. 2.) But however, there is thermodynamic equilibrium. So that argument does not apply here nor is it important. Problems of eternity apply to god as well-Answered Material things run out of energy. You are comparing God to an material thing, which the opposite is true. God is immaterial, which also explains why he can exist outside of space and time. God is eternal, which is infinite time. So God is not bound by space or time. He was never born, He can never die. Always was there and always will be. And you also have questions about God existing outside of space. However, logically it makes sense. Something bound by space can not create space, so that would require a space-less object to create space. Multiverse Theory: There is no compelling or strong evidence about these multi-verses. Even if there were, it still would not undermine God. Like we all agree that our universe is fine tuned. Just like Goldilocks and three bears, its not to hot, its not to cold, its just right. -The laws that govern the universe are delicately balanced to support the emergence and sustenance of intelligent life. -Change any of these laws just a little and life is unsustainable. There are so many examples of Fine-tuning that physicists cannot dismiss them all as mere accidents. -If the initial mass of the universe differed by as little as one grain of salt, there would be no universe. -Life must be in the right type of galaxy, of the three types of galaxies, only spiral galaxies can support life. -Life must be in the right location of the galaxy. We are situated in just the right place in the milky way to avoid harmful radiation. -Life must have the right type of star,while most stars are too large, too luminous, or too unstable to support life, our sun is just the right size and age. -There is a window of time in which a sun can support complex life. It can't be too young or too old. -Life must have the right relationship to its host star. If earth were slightly closer to or farther from the sun, water would either freeze evaporate, rendering earth inhabitable for complex life. Life needs surrounding planets for protection. A habitable planet must have large surrounding bodies (such as Jupiter or Uranus) to protect it from incoming comets. -Life requires the right type of moon. If the earth did not have a moon of the right size and distance it would be uninhabitable. The moon stabilizes the earths tilt, preventing extreme temperatures and thus creating a stable, life-friendly environment. -If we try to assign a probability to the fine-tuning of all the known constants of nature, the necessary digits would be greater than the number of elementary particles in the universe. Con stated that if anything with intelligence comes from prior intelligence but it is absurd to think that the most intelligent being doesn't. How do I respond? Since God is an all-knowing being, He passes down intelligence. He does not come from a higher intelligent being, He is the highest intelligent being. Conclusion: 1.) God existing outside of space and time, can not run out of energy because He is an immaterial being. 2.) The universe is incredibly fine-tuned. If anything about life was changed just a little bit, life would but uninhabitable. Fine-tuning requires Fine-tuners 3.) God didn't come from an intelligent being, He is the intelligent being from which everything comes from. http://www.godandscience.org...