BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God.

You are ignorning the fact that Abraham was the father of the Jews. The Arab you asked where they came from, the one who said they came from Satan, is obvously a hater and his answer was dumb. If you accept that answer, you have to be dumb. I think that Arab was just plain lying. Lying is a cultural thing among Muslims. Ask them, but of course they will lie to you and you will accept whatever dumb answer they give you because you hate the Jews. Being part Jewish does not mean you don't hate them. You talk like you hate them, so i can only conclude that you are blind in your hatred against Israel.....you and your Arab friends who say the Jews came from Satan. Israel should just go and level the whole Gaza strip after giving them notice of the upcoming event so they have time to flee. The problem is, nobody wants the Palestinians. They could easily be taken in by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and other Arab nations. They are just pawns and Hamas uses them as human shields thinking they are being martyrs for their murderous faith in Allah. Only a crazy person can hide behind women and children to attack women and children and think they are doing service to God.God will protect the Jews. Hamas and all the other haters will lose. Hitler could not exterminate them and you never will. God will exterminate you before He allows you to exterminate Israel. The whole world will come agaisnt israel in battle one day, and God will destroy all of their armies, and the blood will run as deep as the horses bridles. Jesus Christ will rule the world from Mt Zion. Islam will be gone from heaven and earth. Islam is murder. God hates it.There is no explanation for the Jews outside of the Bible. Your explanation of the cananites is still a Biblical refrerence. If you think God does not protect Israel, fight againt Israel and see if they remain when you are gone. I know you don't like any of this stuff. That's just too bad for you.
Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God.

You are just plain anti-semitic. You hate the Jews because you are a hater. You have no explaination for the Jews other to say they came from Satan, and that's dumb. The only explanation for the origin and continuing people of Israel is the Bible. If you think they are not protected by God, go ahead and attack them, keep on saying you have the right to live outside of the fire of Hell, and see where you end uo,Muhammed was s thief and a liar. You can believe the Quran if you want to. It's from Hell, and that is where you will end up following Muhammed. Sorry. You need to get saved.
Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God.

"The Koran is nothing but a book of lies fed to the Arabs so that Muhammad could make himself into a religious leader as he tried to escape from his life of being a desert robber and murderer."Actually Muhammad was a very wealthy man married to the owner of one of the largest camel trains in Arabia [1] he was most certainly not a desert robber or murderer. "Muhammad knew most Arabs are raised on hatred for Israel, so he invented a religion to make the Arabs think that God favors them if they kill Jews and Christians." Now do you remember when I quoted this to you last time "Surely those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last day and does good, they shall have their reward from their Lord, and there is no fear for them, nor shall they grieve." [2] That is from the Koran and it says that Christians and Jews will go to heaven but if that is not enough for you, Muhammad himself wrote a constitution during his time as governor of Medina with many protections for its large Jewish population for instance in article 20 the constitution states: "A Jew, who obeys us (the state) shall enjoys the same right of life protection (as the believers do), so long as they (the believers) are not wronged by him. (the Jews), and he does not help (others) against them." [3].Muhammad was by no means an anti-semite. Also I challange you to show me one Quranic verse that allows for the killing of Jews and Christians. "God will defend Israel as He always has. At times he has allowed punishments to fall on the Jews, but He still keeps a remnant of them and all of the promises of God still are fulfilled and will be fulfilled through Israel and the Jews. Jesus Christ will rule the world from Mt. Zion and nobody will be making anybody bow to Islam, and no Muslims will be killing any Jews or Christians any more. Islam is nothing but war and murder and God will defend Israel. The whole world is going to come against Israel and God Himself will wipe out their armies to defend His people, Israel.Saying the Jews came from Satan is dumb. They came from Abraham, the same as Ishmael. Isaac wws born of Sara from Abraham after Ishmael was born of of Hagar, Sara's handmaiden. Esau and Jacob were Isaac's sons, Jacob's name was later changed to Israel. Israel can only be explained by Biblical history. Even when people try to change the Biblical story, they still use the Bible to suppor their twiisted version of the history of israel."Look please if you want to have a debate you must provide evidence. This is just you stating your opinion. Oh and the Biblical family tree which involves all the people of the earth descending from Noah and his wife is genetically impossible [4].[1] Martin Lings: "Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources"[2] Quran 2:62[3] http://www.constitutionofmadina.com...[4] http://genetics.thetech.org...
Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God.

The Koran is nothing but a book of lies fed to the Arabs so that Muhammad could make himself into a religious leader as he tried to escape from his life of being a desert robber and murderer. Muhammad knew most Arabs are raised on hatred for Israel, so he invented a religion to make the Arabs think that God favors them if they kill Jews and Christians. God will defend Israel as He always has. At times he has allowed punishments to fall on the Jews, but He still keeps a remnant of them and all of the promises of God still are fulfilled and will be fulfilled through Israel and the Jews. Jesus Christ will rule the world from Mt. Zion and nobody will be making anybody bow to Islam, and no Muslims will be killing any Jews or Christians any more. Islam is nothing but war and murder and God will defend Israel. The whole world is going to come against Israel and God Himself will wipe out their armies to defend His people, Israel.Saying the Jews came from Satan is dumb. They came from Abraham, the same as Ishmael. Isaac wws born of Sara from Abraham after Ishmael was born of of Hagar, Sara's handmaiden. Esau and Jacob were Isaac's sons, Jacob's name was later changed to Israel. Israel can only be explained by Biblical history. Even when people try to change the Biblical story, they still use the Bible to suppor their twiisted version of the history of israel.
Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God.

Where Arabs Think Israel Came FromYou start off by saying that "Ask any Arab where Israel came from, and they will refer you to the Bible story" I actually asked an Arab I know where Israel came from and the response I got was a mutter about Satan. Why The Arabs Hate The Jews"Arabs hate the Jews because they think al of God's promises were supposed to legally go to the firstborn son" Actually I think it might have more to do with the 90,785 (and counting) Arabs killed by Israel since 1948 [1]. Think about how many deaths in New York on September 11th riled up a similar amount of people, the amount of Arabs killed by Israel is 45 times that certainly reason enough for dislike not to mention the occupation or the threat of nuclear weapons that hangs over the middle east. Your His-story SymbolismHistory actually comes from the Greek word "histor" which means inquiry. Problems With Biblical HistoryI have never been presented with evidence that there was an Israeli slavery in Egypt, if you think you can please do. Further more the Israelites appear to have descended from the native Canaanites of Judea. Also there appears to be no evidence for almost any of the dynasties said to have ruled Israel. Apparent Lack of ProtectionFor the two thousand or so years since the Jews were forced from their native land by the Romans the Jews have endured nothing but hardship from the reconquista in Spain to near eradication in the German Third Reich. If they are indeed being protected by a higher power that higher power that higher power appears not even to be able to single task. [1] . https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...
Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God.

Ask any Arab where Israel came from, and they will refer you to the Bible story (his-story, the "his" in history is God, it's God's story. True history is God's story and God keeps the record of it) Abraham is the Father of the Arabs and the Jews, the Arabs hate the Jews because they think al of God's promises were supposed to legally go to the firstborn son.......Abraham's firstborn son was Ishmael by Sara's handmaiden, and Isaac's firstborn son was Esau. Jacob, who later was named Israel, purchased Esau's birthright for a bowl of soup, and even before that God had promised that the Jacob would be God's chosen one through which to bless all the families of the earth. People in general hate Isreal because Israel is a sign of God's promises being fullfilled, and most people hate God so animosity toward Israel always builds whenever their strength builds.
Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God.

"You are ignorning the fact that Abraham was the father of the Jews."Ok if you want to claim that Abraham was the "father of the Jews" then you have to provide some evidence. In fact you have to provide some evidence that he existed in any way at all. From what I have found there seems to not be a mention of Abraham for fifteen hundred years after his claimed existence."I think that Arab was just plain lying. Lying is a cultural thing among Muslims. Ask them, but of course they will lie to you and you will accept whatever dumb answer they give you because you hate the Jews."Look I explained my understanding of Jewish history last time. You are making a big deal over one rebuttal while not addressing any of the substantive arguments. From the admittedly fairly few Muslims I know personally they seem much more honest than the Christians I know. I have no data or studies to back this up (I have looked) but I reckon that you don't either. Also I really don't hate the Jews, as I said before I am myself a Jew by birth and I also have many relatives who are practicing Jews who do not accept the legitimacy of the Bresheit as a historic account."You talk like you hate them, so i can only conclude that you are blind in your hatred against Israel.....you and your Arab friends who say the Jews came from Satan. "This line made me burst into fits of laughter. I do not have blind hatred of Israel and even if I did this would not make change anything as the last time I checked this debate was on "Israel can only be explained by Biblical history and is protected by God."."Only a crazy person can hide behind women and children to attack women and children and think they are doing service to God."Yes but you must remember those who they are hiding behind are the real Palestinian people."God will protect the Jews. Hamas and all the other haters will lose. Hitler could not exterminate them and you never will. God will exterminate you before He allows you to exterminate Israel. The whole world will come agaisnt israel in battle one day, and God will destroy all of their armies, and the blood will run as deep as the horses bridles. Jesus Christ will rule the world from Mt Zion. Islam will be gone from heaven and earth. Islam is murder. God hates it."I have no interest in killing any Jews. And what evidence can you site for this?"Your explanation of the Canaanites is still a Biblical reference."Really? You think that the bible says that the Israelites were a faction of Canaanites who changed after the uprising of the sea people? I though the bible said that the Israelites were Egyptian slaves who ran away (by the way there is no evidence for this) and exterminated the Canaanites. It most certainly doesn't state that the Jews were (are?) Canaanites. No the evidence for a Jewish Canaanite link is based off of the cultural similarities, the shared gods (the Jews were originally polytheistic [1]) and lack of any other reasonable explanation.[1] Mark S. Smith: "The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel’s Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts"
Evolution is a FACT

Ever since Darwin came up with the idea that spieces evolved, science has been trying to prove him wrong. Over 100 years later and thousands of experiments later, science has failed to prove Darwin wrong. Everything they tried actually confirms evolution as a fact. (They = qualified scientists)With DNA alone. you can take any two spieces that exist and trace them back to the common ancestor they evolved from.The fossile record only confirms the DNA evidence. Using several forms of radiometric dating that all converge on the same results, every fossile ever found fits into the tree of evolution exactly where it would be expected to fit. All it would take to disprove evolution, would be to find just one fossile that didn't belong where the theory says it should go. It's also important to realize that a scientific theory is not the same as non-scientific theory. When used in non-scientific context, the word “theory” implies that something is unproven or speculative.A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step—known as a theory—in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.http://www.livescience.com...;
Public High School Students ought not be Required to Pass Exit Exams to Graduate

Hey, yeah, it's an LD topic debate. I have a schedule and plan to debate every topic on DDO at least once through my whole High School Debate Career, so, thanks for accepting. I'll be taking the NEGATIVE for this debate, though I feel it may have a disadvantage topically. I do this because this is the only way to maintain LD speaking format on DDO. Round 1B = 1AC Round 2A = 1NR Round 2B = 1AR Round 3A = 2NR Round 3B = 2AR With this, I also place a burden on my opponent: You must follow LD requirements. This includes, but is not limited to: -Not missing a speech or dropping an argument -Not making abusive arguments (pertaining to NFL rules) -Not make extra-topical arguments Et cetera, et cetera Also, voters: PLEASE LEAVE RFD'S I don't care who you vote for, and I KNOW my opponent will agree, but PLEASE leave a reason. Secondly, I ask that if you choose to vote, you vote based off of LD rules as well. This means that you should NOT vote if you do not understand them. Read one of the many websites online (I beg that you use NFLonline, because EVERY other one I have seen has indoctrinated their veiwers with unnecessary theory arguments hidden amoung text) and KNOW the debate before you vote. This is NOT Public-Forum Debate, and we do NOT want parent judges. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will, however, post a little bit of my Negative Constructive: "Resolved: Public High School Students in the United States ought not be required to Pass Standardized Exit Exams to Graduate" I negate.
Second place is more valuable than first.

Good luck to you too and I hope this will be an enjoyable debate. So Ill bullet each of your points answer them then say some of my own points. 1. The point about the resolution is hardly worth debating but Ill do so any way. You cannot start the race in first or second you can only finish in a place. To begin the race at a position then you would have to have already raced, etc. thus bringing us the whether one point is better than the other, which is what we will debate. 2. For these examples you gave about the Giants and the Diamondbacks really only support my position that 1st is the most important. Both examples argue that people wanted the underdog to win, aka 1st place. They didn't want their team to take 2nd but first. Personally I supported the Patriots because I wanted to see them have an undefeated season. The Patriots lost and ended up in 2nd place as a disappointment to many. Also if you watched both games then you would notice that once the team takes first place they party and celebrate while the 2nd place team wallows and walks off defeated; they have no glory in 2nd place. So your argument doesn't even support your cause because really the point of your argument is for a team to win 1st based on where they were seeded. 3. You argue that 2nd is most important because it holds incentive to win while being in first has no point to train or improve. This again is false because while a team might be in first at that time it wont be so as soon as the next season starts, they need to win again and fight just as hard for 1st place. Again this argument contradicts itself because if a team trains hard to win they are shooting for 1st place again showing the all importance of coming in 1st place not 2nd people will work hard so they can be 1st not 2nd. 4. This argument says that winners will lose sleep then decline in overall status. I don't believe in this argument just from personal experience. My lacrosse team is 6-0 and we don't feel any pressure at all. A team gets an alloted time to practice the compete and thats all. If anything we get a better nights sleep because we are physically exhausted from the intense training. I consider this point moot. 5. This is the monetary argument. I'm assuming this is a joke but Ill play along. 1st holds more monetary value because if you take first in a competition you will get a higher amount of money as a reward than you would if you took second place. As a summary based on the arguments you should vote CON because everyone strives to become 1st place and take the championship etc. Also to quote Ricky Bobby "If your not first your last."
Pharmacies shouldn't be allowed to sell contraceptives to teens under the state's age of consent

Thanks pro. First I'll respond to your points. My Opponent didn't bother to tag his arguments, so I'll do so as best I can. Contraceptives are badTurn: Teens will have sex anyway. Unless my opponent can prove that he teenage sex will decline without access to contraceptives, he gains no advantage. His entire argument can basicaly be summed up as "contraceptives are bad and sometimes fail" But really, I don't need to respond to this. With contracetives the chance of pregnancy and diseases declines. STDS are badAgain, the same logic applies. At least contraceptives have a getter chance of protecting an individual from diseases than unprotected sex does (hence the name). My Opponent argues: "[Teens] tend to feel that they're 100% in the clear if they use contraceptives". First off, dont buy this without evidence, secondly the way to avoid this problem, if indeed it is one, is by educating teenagers on the dangers, instead of banning condoms and expecting them to figure it all out on their own. He ends by claiming that contraceptives will keep teenagers from having sex, without any warrant, evidence, or logic. Thus you already negate because he's failed to make any positive arguments for his position. My case:Age of consent useless My Opponent makes my case for me, he argues that " he age of consent is 16, so if a 16 year old or older has sex with a 15 year old or younger, the crime of statutory rape stands. And depending on the age of the prosecutor and the defendant, the total sentencing could be up to 20 years". I think throwing a 16 year old in prison for 20 years because they have sex with a peer that's a couple months younger than them is evidence enough that these laws need to be overturned. Thanks, Pro! He also argues: " nobody is above the law. Absolutely NOBODY!", however if the law itself is unjust than we shouldn't follow it. Using his logic, Rosa Parks was wrong in refusing to sit in the back of the bus and blacks and whites would still drink from seperate water fountains. His entire argument is based upon sex being a crime, but since he hasn't responded to my self autonomy point his objection falls. Violation of property rightsExtend. Pro can lose the deate right here considering he hasn't offered any sufficient arguments for his position.His sole response to this is a concession that the body is private property, then stating "You can't do drugs like cocaine and heroine... Because they can harm your body" but again, he hasn't responded whatsoever to the ethics behind this, that you can do whatever you wish with your body so long as it doesnt harm others. Extend the Hoppe card. Drugs should be legalized, pro can't just point to something that's illegal and say that makes it immoral, recall that inter racial marriage was illegal at one point as well.Teen will have sex anywayExtend. You have no logical option except a Con vote.