The Atonement of Jesus Christ is Immoral.

Before going into my argument regarding the morality of the atonement of Jesus Christ, I would like make something very clear. I do not believe that Jesus Christ is our savior or redeemer. There is no evidence to believe that Jesus Christ Atoned for our sins. The story of Jesus Christ follows the motif of pagan Gods even to an inclusion of atonement for sins for our salvation. Jesus Christ's story is not unique or special in any way. I make my argument as if this event occurred only to bring to light a pervasive doctrine that stands on shaky moral ground. So let's begin with my argument and topic at hand. The atonements of Jesus Christ is immoral and here's why: Punishments can include harm or detainment. Major: Punishing and or Harming and or detaining an innocent is immoral. Minor: Penal substitution requires 'punishing and or harming and or detaining an innocent' for the crimes of another. Conclusion: Therefore, penal substitution is immoral with a possible exception. Exception: If penal substitution worked effectively to produce the most happiness for all involved in a community, it may be moral. There are two reasons for which humans may find penal substitution as an end to justify means to provide the most happiness possible for a community. Penal substitution can be used as punishment on the convicted to produce a feeling of guilt in the mind of the convicted to modify behavior to thwart further punishment against the innocent, and ultimately, to thwart criminal behavior. The innocent being punished may request the truly convicted to modify his or her behavior to thwart further punishment against the innocent, and ultimately, to thwart criminal behavior. There is no way to guarantee the truly convicted will modify his or her behavior based on the reasons listed above. (I can explain why it's impossible to guarantee behavioral modification upon your request.) If modification doesn't occur, there will be continued suffering and or discomfort for the punished and others. This is an axiom. Many will suffer as a result, including the innocent being punished. (Please see the example below for further details on this point.) Among humans, penal substitution will remain ineffective. If penal substitution is ineffective, it remains immoral. Therefore, the atonement of Jesus Christ is immoral. Here is an example: If we work in an office together, and I make a mistake, which causes our boss economic grief. He is angry with me, but he fires you using penal substitution. You request that I no longer make that same mistake again. And I may feel guilty to modify my behavior and no longer make the same mistake. However, in the end, there is no way to guarantee that I won't make the same mistake. And if I know that I can get away with making this mistake without punishment, I may continue onward getting the next person in line fired from the office. As a result many new employees, the company, and my boss will suffer from this repeated mistake. God created a system that requires substitution for the punishment of our sins through his son Jesus Christ for our salvation. He used an ineffective means to modify human behavior. I believe, as a result of this method are clear to see. Not that I would deem many of gods commandments crimes; however, these alleged sins are repeatedly committed by Christians without modification or correction. Evidence for my argument, in many ways, is staring at believers' in their face.