Resolved: The average intelligence of a Fox News Anchor is = or < the average intelligence of a rock

"I will rebut Pro’s claims in the coming round to keep the rounds fair. Please try to be funnier in the coming round, Pro."Ok I am asking for an immediate concession of the conduct point among voters. Anybody who takes a troll debate seriously, responds seriously, and then asks the pro to be funnier after not addressing any of his videos he had to find is clearly not good conduct and should thus be penalized. Now back to the main argument"Even the most primitive animals are more intelligent than rocks"You underestimate the power and intelligence of rocks sir, I will now present this as evidence showing just how intelligent rocks are. The footage you are about to see comes from the movie "At World's End" when rocks coordinate and communicate to move a massive ship (The Black Pearl) across desert and into the ocean. http://www.youtube.com...See, rocks clearly moved the ship from the desert to the ocean, all by themselves, with no help from people. Your "all life is smarter than rocks" argument has therefore been debunked. "There are a few categories that place Fox News Anchors above the world’s average IQ and the US average IQ"And there are several other categories that place Fox News Anchors below the average IQ of a pile of crap which you conveniently left out of your argument. "All Fox News Anchors have college degrees"According to the videos I posted before, those degrees were probably earned by cheating off the smart Asian kids who sat in front of them during the tests, and the Fox Anchors clearly didnt learn sh*t...."In fact, a few have attended Harvard (the most prestigious University in the world) like Bill O’Reilly"Your own source even says that Bill O'Reilly didnt attend Harvard, in fact your own source clearly states that "After graduating from high school in 1967, O'Reilly attended Marist College in Poughkeepsie, New York, his father's choice"Who told you that O'Reilly attended Harvard? Was it O'Reilly??? (If that is the case I would like to add this as more evidence showing that Fox News Anchors are full of sh*t)Clearly the Con's sources completely falsify his own claims (Just like Fox News Anchors on Fox News ;D) So rather than do the Con's work for him and see which colleges these anchors went too and cheated off the smart asian in front of them, Ill just dismiss his claims that Fox News Anchors are smart as bullsh*t until proven otherwise. (RELEASE THEIR TRANSCRIPTS!!!!!)Lastly their is the claim that Fox News Anchors are smarter than the average American1) See videos above2) The reason why the average American IQ is at 100 instead of much higher like it was in the past is because people watch fox news and thus become stupider. There are many studies showing that people who watch Fox News are much more misinformed then just about anybody else, and there is a ton of evidence supporting this claimTon of Evidence:Sources showing that people who watch Fox News are the most misinformed:"The extent of Americans’ misperceptions vary significantly depending on their source of news. Those who receive most of their news from Fox News are more likely than average to have misperceptions." - Page 12http://www.pipa.org..."There was also differences by where people get their information with higher shares of those who report CNN (35%) or MSNBC (39%) as their primary news source getting 7 or more questions right [out of 10 questions in the survey] compared to those that report mainly watching Fox News (25%)" - Page 4 http://www.kff.org..."People who use CNN and NPR believe fewer false rumors (compared to those who watch Fox News)" - Page 3http://www.comm.ohio-state.edu..." There probably is a small group of media consumers out there somewhere in the world who are more misinformed, overall, than Fox News viewers. But if you only consider mainstream U.S. television news outlets with major audiences (e.g., numbering in the millions), it really is true that Fox viewers are the most misled based on all the available evidence—especially in areas of political controversy."http://www.alternet.org... "they found that voters who made the effort to watch TV news and read about the issues were less likely to be misinformed. Not surprisingly, there was a significant exception: Fox News."http://www.usnews.com..."The release yesterday of yet another survey indicating the more you watch Fox News the less they know"http://mediamatters.org..." 7 Studies Showing That Fox News Viewers Are The Most Misinformed"http://scienceprogressaction.org..."As was the case eight years ago, Fox News viewers were “significantly more likely” to be confused about reality."http://www.washingtonmonthly.com..."Yet another study has shown that Fox News viewers are the most misinformed about important political issues — this time, global warming"http://grist.org...Heres the best one:"Fox News viewers are less informed than people who don't watch any news" http://www.huffingtonpost.com...Since rocks dont watch the news at all and people who watch fox news are less informed then those who dont watch the news at all, one can conclude that people who watch fox news are not as informed as rocks. Therefore the anchors telling things to viewers making them less informed than rocks implies the anchors are less informed then rocks. So all in all, Rocks are intelligent since they can move ships over land by themselves, people who watch Fox news are less informed then people who dont even watch the news, rocks are more informed than people who watch fox news, and the videos from the previous round show how dumb the fox news anchors are.