Call of Duty:Modern Warfare 2 is a better game than Call of Duty:Black Ops

I first off would like to congratulate my opponent on such a well thought out rebuttal. You are taking this debate much more seriously than I previously thought. However, your Wikipedia definitions are more than slightly misguided. Unfortunately my responses are going to be very limited due to the character limit Camping: Notice "MOST" in your definition, it by no means declares camping is an acceptable form of game play in black ops or MWF2. Also, if you speak with any experienced player he will tell you camping is most defiantly not acceptable. Everyone does it because it is easy to do and gets you the most kills. It doesn't make it right. Knifing: "In the Campaign, the knife sees a lot more use in scripted events and has a wider range for different uses, usually when stealth is required" In scripted events… the character is not being controlled by you in these events. If he was being controlled by you it is completely different Spawning: I never stated spawning had to be real, how could it be you're a person appearing out of thin air. My point was this; if the spawns on black ops were better it would make the game a lot more fair. Definition of better: My definition of better is not what sold more, but what would of sold more if the game was purchased off of its own merit instead of some insane marketing campaign… this game would never have sold like it did if it wasn't for it having the largest marketing budget of all time for any of the Call of Duty franchise. Before I buy a game I ask friends and research a bit before I do, as I'm sure most other do. The hype on this game was so big though that everyone pre-ordered instead of even playing it first, preorders on this game surpassed Modern Warfare 2. This game produced two very large budget commercials, one with "More stars in it than the Oscars" and the other featuring a limited edition "Black Ops" Jeep[1]. You cannot sit here and tell me honestly that having the largest marketing budget of all time for the franchise didn't have anything to do with the amount of copies they sold. Not only that but black ops has one thing that Modern Warfare 2 does not have, Nazi Zombies. Which on its own could be accounting for over half the sales. That actually can be defined as a different game completely. Most, if not all the people I know who play Black Ops (Including myself) only play it now for Nazi Zombies. Lets keep it simple though, User Satisfaction: User reviews off of IGN give Modern Warfare 2 a rating of 8.6 [2] User reviews off of IGN give Black Ops a rating of 7.8 [3] Also, a slightly large exerpt from http://www.pcworld.com... states. "Black Ops seems to be taking it on the chin at Amazon, too. Both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions are hovering at 3.5 out of 5 stars, slightly better than average, but below expected levels given mainstream critical consensus. The Windows version, by contrast, drops to a painful 2 out of 5 off 33 reviews. "[T]his game was a huge letdown," says one reviewer of the PC version. "It is filled with bugs, laggy servers, graphics issues, and an overall 'tacky' feel. The graphics are also a downgrade from Modern Warfare 2, which is severely disappointing." Compare Black Ops' critical ratings on Metacritic against its user scores and the disparity's thrown into stark relief. The game's overall score, averaging 41 critical reviews, holds at 90 out of 100, but the user rating for the Xbox 360 version drops to just 6.7 out of 10, the PS3 version to 5.9 out of 10, and the PC version to a startling 5.2 out of 10."[4] Sources: [1]http://innovateordie.com.au... [2] http://xbox360.ign.com... [3] http://xbox360.ign.com... [4]http://www.pcworld.com...