welfare

It looks like somebody is triggered FROM ALL THEIR CAPS. "If it means they are working for it, it's not "welfare", or "assistance" it's them 100% DESERVING every penny they are given, so YES, you WOULD be getting rid of "welfare" completely by your idea. You response is typical of a Republican, you don't care about people or children, you just care about money." All I care about is money? Well sir I am not rich, at all. I lived most of my life at about 10 thousand dollars per year for a family of 4, and we do just fine. And from your quote that I just cited it seems like you support giving out gifts to everyone, and anybody who doesn't is a rich person that doesn't want the well being of other people. "The problem you don't address is that MOST people getting financial assistance ARE working, many times FULL TIME, but their employers are UNDER paying them to the point that they NEED assistance to make ends meet." Well you are talking about the problem of wages being too low and everything costing too much money, and I would solve that if I were president by first making taxes on employers somewhat high but then give tax breaks to them for raising wages to their workers all around, therefore wages for everybody decent would raise but their is no incentive to raise prices for their services, so everything is cheaper while people would have more money. I also support abolishing sales tax and income taxes for people making x<75,000 which would be very helpful in poor people buying food, so you see I am not anti-poor. Another problem about the wages everybody should consider is that our massive trade deficits are giving away millions of jobs, just from China we gave away 3.2 million jobs http://www.usnews.com... which would make jobs more competitive in the US, causing wages to be lower. And my factory proposal is related to the work for welfare type of polices, but I feel that the original proposal is not the safest net for people that are truthfully trying, and my factory proposal would pay for itself. What type of factory? A little bit of everything, it is just an idea to make revenue besides taxing people for what they earned and make a safety net just in case they can't find a decent paying job. "And WHAT on Earth are you talking about putting CHILDREN to work?" A big reason why my family were in poverty was because children are not allowed to work at all because the government just don't think it is right, so less economic freedom that would hurt the lower classes the most! And under my proposal for giving children the right to work if they want to couples living in poverty still have potential to have children because they may actually support them along the way. Also children already have to work at school, so don't be too dramatic. I am also not advocating for industrial revolution type of labor for children, they can just clean buildings or build some toys. So please tell me why my mostly-libertarian plan would be catastrophic for the poor if it provides them with a guaranteed chance to work for a livable wage, abolish sale taxes and income taxes, give incentives to employers for giving higher wages, bring jobs back to America, give their children the freedom to work if it is necessary for the family's financial security, and eliminate the deficit so the market rating would increase giving more economic prosperity to America, which would help everyone.