Islam the master of religions and the most complete

What my opponent done here is simply tried to shift the Bop on me completely. My opponent made the claim that Islam is the master of all religions and he is the one who should be giving arguments for it. Not me giving arguments against it. Also, this arguments completely fails logically. Me not bringing one mistake in the Qur'an or Sunna does not make Islam a master of all religions. This same argument could be used for Buddhism or Hinduism. I could simply say well bring me one mistake in Buddhism or Hinduism and if you don't, your religion is not the master of all religions. However as I hate backing out from a debate, I will give an example I used before of a mistake in the Sunna. This is what my opponent asked for, despite being a failed argument. My opponent then contradicts himself completely and uses another logical fallacy by saying " Islam is pretty clear, one book to follow and nothing else, pretty simple. While other religions have lots of books and complicated stuff to follow." This is a logical fallacy, an argument from ignorance. You not understanding certain religions does not make them complicated or non sensical. The same way these religions are complicated and makes no sense, the same way you are to them. If you disbelieve in the story of Buddha and that was he divinely conceived [1] and consider it a fairytale. The same way Buddhists would see the story of Muhammad riding a legendary horse called Boraq and travelling through the seven skies. The second mistake my opponent committed in the previous passage, is claiming that Islam is following one book only. While in fact the people who only follow this one book (ie :- Qur'an) are Quranists and are considered heretics by the mainstream Sunni and Shia majority sects. Muslims, depending on the sect, each follow their own sayings of Muhammad. Sunni and Shia Hadith collections differ because scholars from the two traditions differ as to the reliability of the narrators and transmitters. Narrators who took the side of Abu Bakr and Umar rather than Ali, in the disputes over leadership that followed the death of Muhammad, are seen as unreliable by the Shia; narrations sourced to Ali and the family of Muhammad, and to their supporters, are preferred. Sunni scholars put trust in narrators, such as Aisha, whom Shia reject. Differences in Hadith collections have contributed to differences in worship practices and shari'a law and have hardened the dividing line between the two traditions. What my opponent finally claimed is that the prophet and knowledge in the Qur'an are all proven true. This is an unsubstantiated claim with no backing evidence. I could simply say the same thing regarding any religion and claim it is the master of all religions. My opponent has failed completely to provide any arguments for Islam and committed multiple logical fallacies and wild claims with absolutely no backing evidence or any convincing arguments. I was hoping for more of this debate but unfortunately my opponent did not even try. However, I will provide my arguments against Islam and show why it is not the master of all religions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------First I will copy a previous mistake in the Sunna I've submitted here on DB and copy paste it: " N.B:- This Hadith is a bit long, so I underlined the part in contention as the rest is not really related to my argument.Sahih Bukhari Volume 04, Book 55, Hadith Number 546 : "Narrated By Anas : When 'Abdullah bin Salam heard the arrival of the Prophet at Medina, he came to him and said, "I am going to ask you about three things which nobody knows except a prophet: What is the first portent of the Hour? What will be the first meal taken by the people of Paradise? Why does a child resemble its father, and why does it resemble its maternal uncle" Allah's Apostle said, "Gabriel has just now told me of their answers." 'Abdullah said, "He (i.e. Gabriel), from amongst all the angels, is the enemy of the Jews." Allah's Apostle said, "The first portent of the Hour will be a fire that will bring together the people from the east to the west; the first meal of the people of Paradise will be Extra-lobe (caudate lobe) of fish-liver. As for the resemblance of the child to its parents: If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her." On that 'Abdullah bin Salam said, "I testify that you are the Apostle of Allah." 'Abdullah bin Salam further said, "O Allah's Apostle! The Jews are liars, and if they should come to know about my conversion to Islam before you ask them (about me), they would tell a lie about me." The Jews came to Allah's Apostle and 'Abdullah went inside the house. Allah's Apostle asked (the Jews), "What kind of man is 'Abdullah bin Salam amongst you?" They replied, "He is the most learned person amongst us, and the best amongst us, and the son of the best amongst us." Allah's Apostle said, "What do you think if he embraces Islam (will you do as he does)?" The Jews said, "May Allah save him from it." Then 'Abdullah bin Salam came out in front of them saying, "I testify that None has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah." Thereupon they said, "He is the evilest among us, and the son of the evilest amongst us," and continued talking badly of him." [3]This is the second Hadith in contention. Muhammad answered the question of why a child resembles one of the parents more than the other and the answer was absurd. Muhammad claimed that Gabriel (The angel that revealed the Qur'an upon him) answer was, if a women discharges first then the resemblance will be to the maternal uncle or if the man discharges first the resemblance will be for the father. Anyone who studied biology would know that the vaginal discharge or fluid has no genetic material at all. The genetic material is contained within the egg. Either way, who discharges first has no impact on who the child resembles. The resemblance is based solely on dominant/recessive traits that are contained within the DNA of the sperm and egg. Mendelian inheritance explain this phenomenon quite efficiently [2]. For extra information here is a website that explains child resemblance http://www.dnaftb.org......" My next criticisms of Islam will rest on the following arguments briefly due to character limit:1. Muhammad Marriages: Muhammad had set a limit of 4 women per man. Yet he himself has failed to comply to his own rules. Muhammad married from 11-13 wives with an unknown number of concubines. Some of the disputed marriages are: A. Aisha: She was 6 years old when Muhammad engaged her and 9 years old when Muhammad consummated his marriage with her. There was absolutely on reason for this marriage except that Muhammad wanted to. There was no alliance to be made with her father Abu Bakr as he was his best friend or was she a war slave like others he had married. B. Rihanna: She was enslaved in the invasion of Banu Quraiza. Most scholars actually agree that she was only a concubine and not one of his wives. C. Zainab: She was the husband of an ex-slave Muhammad owned named Zaid ibn Harith. He was considered his son until adoption was abandoned. Muslims claim that Muhammad did this to prove to people that your adopted son is not your real son and his wife is not unlawful to you. Even if we take the case for it, this is absolutely in humane to raise someone and then marrying his ex-wife however they hated each other. Muhammad had many other marriages that were also completely unnecessary and shows only that Muhammad thought of his own sexual benefit. 2. Slavery: Islam does not condemn slavery but in fact condones it. Ma Malakat Aymanukum or what your hand posses or literally meaning concubines is repeated 14 times in the Qur'an. Female captives from war are regarded as concubines and are allowed to have sex with just the same as you would with your wife in the Qur'an (Chapter 4:24). There is not once said in the Qur'an to free "Ma Malakat Aymanukum" or regarded as anything else but sex objects. So tell me, how does this make Islam the master of all religions? Lastly, there is no obligation in Islam for the freeing of slaves. Some Muslims say that Muhammad freed slaves but it was not a necessary act and there is no hereafter punishment for owning slaves. Simply, slavery is permitted in Islam. 3. Apostasy: This is simple, you leave Islam then you either have 3 days to repent or be killed. If you publicly declare that you left Islam in a Shari'a law based country you will be killed. Christian missionaries are persecuted in Islamic countries and are not allowed to preach their faith to Muslims. Yet in western countries, Muslims enjoy the complete freedom of preaching their religion and claiming how peaceful it is. -----------------------------------------------------------------------I could have brought more arguments against Islam but I think that those are enough for now and also complying with character limit. If we compare Islam to Buddhism we will find that Buddhism contains no violence, no slavery, no polygamy and certainly no pedophilia. If we make the same claim as Pro then Buddhism is the master of all religions. However, I will await my opponent reply and wait to see his convincing arguments "for" Islam. Thank you.