National Socialism vs Communism

The definition of National Socialism is as stated, "The political doctrine of the Nazi Party of Germany" I find it very hard to conclude that you do not have pro Nazi bias, or at least ignorance to what exactly your party represents. There are three things that I find wrong with your argument. One, you deny the holocaust. Two, you believe that the melanin in ones skin defines their racial superiority. Three, you believe that communist people should be executed. I am going to start with the first part wrong with your argument. First, you do not give any proof of the absence of Nazi genocide by stating, "And don't start telling me about the holocaust, because it didn't happen and you have no proof that it happened." You show no evidence to support your point, and you discount the millions of witnesses, and thousands upon thousands of interviews, photos, and videos to support the Holocaust. To discount all of the evidence staring you in the face is quite ignorant. And to not give any proof to your thesis is basic debate hogwash.The second major flaw in your argument relates to race. Science has shown again and again, that skin color has nothing to do with higher brain function. The main effects on higher brain function relate to cultural effects, rather than biological effects. During the Spanish inquisition, the Spaniards viewed the South Americans as an inferior race. Yet these people had invented mathematical machines and calculations leaps and bounds ahead of any civilization at the time. Math ability is a very strong indicator to the absence of race superiority. Every culture in the world has made mathematical discoveries, regardless of the innovation level at the time. The best example of race mixing for the betterment of mankind would be during the Roman Empire and the Greek Empire. Hundreds of cultures combined all of their individual discoveries to create an empire like none before in history. Most math, all the way up to the Calculus level was discovered at this time, and would not have been possible without the mixture of cultures and therefore, "races". Also in regards to race, if you believe that White is a pure race, then historically, and biologically, you are wrong. People with blond hair and blue eyes can still be 100% black. (See the albino black children in Africa) Additionally, the term White is so general, and so broad, that to assume every single white person has certain common weaknesses and strengths is the most absurd case of Hasty Generalization fallacy I have ever seen. You are generalizing literally Millions upon millions of people, each with their own heritage and history. This is completely illogical and wrong at the most basic level of elementary logic.Your third mistake is in the area of Communism. I am not a communist, I am a pure capitalist. I see problems with both Communism, and any form of Socialism. The idea that because I am breathing, I deserve someone else's things is the most selfish concept I have ever comprehended. Also, the Idea that because I have less or more melanin in my skin, that I have inherent weaknesses or strengths is the most illogical, and bias argument in human society. Racism has caused so many problems in society, and has been a force to divide, rather than unify us. While I don't agree with communism, I do not believe that it is worse than your political party. I believe that just like in your view of races, your political party has both strengths, and weaknesses. Your party is very effective at drawing from outside appearance of others, and using hasty generalizations. Communism is very effective at drawing support from poorer classes, drawing from selfishness and greed. Both of the systems are flawed, and to say that you are right because at least you arent Communist is like saying I can rape someone because at least it's not murder. Its ignorant, and has no base in logic or reason.