Parents should disown their homosexual children.

Your logic about all homosexuals being adults is simply false. Children are able to make obvious decisions about things such as their sexuality (which is an inborn trait, see the link below) without being full adults who are obliged to provide for themselves. They could not choose to be heterosexual. You say that you're not talking about abandoning them, but that's exactly what disownment means. Exactly what are you arguing for? Link: https://www.health24.com... You claim that being gay is somehow inferior to being straight because "it's a return to base instinct", but you're the one arguing that your children are obligated to pass on your genes. That's a return to microbe-thinking. Also anal sex is (a) not the only option for gay men, and (b) only applies to gay men, not women. Also, it is practiced by many straight males, so your whole point is moot. Your long, rambling paragraph about the evils of homosexuality is full of incorrect claims and faulty logic. Only a tiny portion of the homosexual (and heterosexual) population are pedophiles, so you can't tar them all with the same brush. Additionally, statistics about the prevalence of homosexuality are unreliable and the actual number is likely much higher. Many people are still not out as gay, which would cause researchers to significantly underestimate the number of gay people. And anyway, the vast majority of sexual abusers are heterosexual, meaning the if anything, straight people are more immoral than gay people. Here;s a link: http://stopabusecampaign.org... You say that the social safety net is bad, because it "subsidizes poverty". I don't want to debate welfare with you, that deserves it's own conversation. But disownment and nonacceptance are risk factors for poverty, STDs, drug abuse, risky behavior, early death, and so much more. Why are you encouraging that? You also make a completely unsubstantiated claim about "psychopathic tendencies", which is not only completely false (homosexuality affects sexual orientation and nothing more) but also reveals the underlying hate and self-decievement behind your argument, which at least pretends to have a basis in logic. This calls into question your motivation for arguing in the first place. Despite growing acceptance of homosexuality, there is still rampant discrimination, and it's largely legal. Most states do not ban businesses from discriminating based on sexual orientation, meaning that hateful people such as yourself are still allowed to act on your views. You say that homosexuals are already broken, but they're not>> All they need to function is society is to be allowed to be who they are, just like anyone else. You say that "sexuality is incapable of being forced on anyone", so it doesn't make sense that you're also arguing that we should encourage people not to be gay. Which is it? You should love homosexual children as human beings, which means that you should support them like you would your other children! Jesus Christ, how is there even a debate over this?! Gay people are very capable of being productive members of society. The only thing standing in their way is people like you.