Barack Obama is an Islamic mole

Thanks to my opponent for this debate! "The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam" First of all, this quote is entirely benign. My opponent makes the assumption that by making this claim, there is a sudden verdict of partiality whence religion is mentioned. The President was making that statement in response to anti-Muslim rhetoric that has escalated in recent years. According to the first amendment, the freedom of religion is in unalienable right, which is a topic that retains to civil rights, but out of nature of this debate, I will not continue. I have simply debunked this quote, as it does not represent concrete evidence. "Obama has funded the construction of Mosques" A dirth in knowledge of foreign policy is conveyed by my opponent when making this argument, as I am sure that all parties in this debate can agree that there was and still are events that would make building/rebuilding mosques necessary. (ISIS?) In the United States, the government is required to fund the construction of religious establishments under the first amendment and Section X.V in Federal Religious Law. Overseas, Obama has funded building mosques in the middles east and parts of the Mediterranean, however this point doesn't provide insight as to how that immediately makes Obama an Islamic mole. Rebuilding mosques improves diplomacy around the world and especially the Middle East. Argument made by my opponent: Obama's fierce willingness to accept Syrian refugees identifies him as an Islamic mole. This argument can be easily debunked, as wanting to accept Syrian refugees is not only a part of the Democratic Platform. Using this argument as a means of saying Obama wants to commit espionage in the name of Islam, essentially means that Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and all liberals are as well, which is utterly false. "Obama has failed to recognize Christian Genocide committed by extremist in Middle East." If the Christian genocide in the Middle East is bad, the Muslim genocide commited by the same groups would be classified as apocalyptic. Obama according to some, has not made as big enough an effort to destroy Isis militarily, however this is common among liberal agenda politics, which returns to my previous counter argument. The above point made by my point is not evidence and to recognize it as such would be as strong an abomination as the resolution itself. In Obama's Freudian slip, he mistakenly says "my Muslim faith", which according to my opponent, signals that he has been spying on America for eight years in his tenure as commander in chief. What may be overlooked, however, is that Obama comes from Muslim heritage from his father's side, which he was asked about right before asked about his personal religion. Again, not strong enough evidence to make a solid assertion. I will not make much of my opponent's argument about Robert Gibbs, since I believe there may have been a typo or mistake on his/her end. Robert Gibbs said Obama was never a Muslim, then said he never was a practicing Muslim. Since both mean that he was not Muslim in practice, essentially disproving the resolution cast by my opponent. If my opponent needs to clarify in the comments, I urge the readers/voters to allow this as part of the argument. Thanks! "The sweetest sound I've ever heard is a Muslim call to prayer" This is probably the most arbitrary argument made thus far in this debate. Since Obama simply likes the sound of the athan(call to prayer) is is nonsensical to say that he directly is commuting espionage against the United States. I will not continue with this point, since the readers can Jude its credibly and relation to the resolution. My opponent had made a good argument while saying that he prayed as a Muslim in Indonesia, which had even an eyewitness, who is yet to be vetted as reliable. Before jumping to conclusions, let's look at facts that are present: Indonesia is a Muslim country, most school in Indonesia have Islamic scripture as part of the curriculum(s) across all districts of the country. To put this into context, a Jew could go to an Christian university and still be a Jew, even if that school had chapel as a required course, so this begs the question, "why can't a Christian do the same in Islamic school?" Btw, Islamic schools teach the recitation of Qur'an, which explains Obama being able to recite. Many religious scholars of all religions are able to recite as well, making the recitation argument benign to the solution of the resolution. Questionig Obama's faith as a Christian to me personally seems out of bounds for me, since I will never make judgements about faith based on knowledge of religion. It is not as if Obama is the only one who knows little about Christianity, as there are millions who do not know major concepts of their proclaimed faith, which debunks this argument. "I made it clear that America isn't and never will be at war with Islam" First of all, George Bush said almost the same thing after the worst attack in American history, and leading conservatives don't believe there isn't as well. Extremism is what is targeted by Obama and other diplomats, not a while religion. The burden of proof is CLEARLY on my opponent, since it is sparked only by conspiracy and not backed up with any concrete evidence, conclusions or commentary among them. I will make my point that there is no solid evidence to accuse our commander in chief of treason, which is a serious crime.