Donald Trump Should not be Impeached: Change my Mind

1. Donald Trump still receives financial reports from the Trump Organization. This shows that he is inextricably tied to the Trump Organization, Despite being POTUS. This maintained close relationship to the Trump Organization means that he has enriched himself off of taxpayer dollars. This is an abuse of power and hence he should be impeached 2. Obviously these cases are not mere allegations. For example, The access hollywood tape, The central park five case and birtherism are all well-founded and established. In the birtherism case in particular, Obama's grandmother did not state that he was born in Kenya nor is there evidence of a forged birth certificate. A cursory google searched revealed this as such. Being unable to perform due diligence before making such claims against the previous POTUS is not good reasoning. The other two cases have sufficient evidence behind them to place them past allegations. Now having said all this, I feel you've completely misunderstood my point in using these examples. It is not to highlight "bad stuff" he did, And therefore be impeached for them. It is to show what kind of president Donald Trump is. What his character is like, What are his flaws and to highlight traits of the role-model citizen of the USA. More importantly, It is to examine if this conduct is becoming of the POTUS. My examples have shown that he is a hypocrite, A liar, An infidel husband, Impulsive, Lacking in wisdom, Perverted, Stubborn, Disrespectful and vulgar and you've failed to defend him otherwise. Having the opinion that "I don't even wait. And when you're a star, They let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the p***y. You can do anything. " is a simple matter of perception is not a defence for the crassness of that particular line. These are not the characteristics of POTUS and his conduct is unbecoming of his office. Hence he should be impeached 3. Again, You've completely misunderstood my point in using these examples. My point here was not to criticise Trump on specific examples of foreign policy, But to highlight his disastrous attempts at engaging with leaders globally. He is incapable of interacting with foreign leaders in any meaningful sense. He has created tension with many countries considered to be allies and public perception of America has gone down globally. A leader of a country is expected to competently engage with other leaders of foreign countries. Donald Trump cannot do this and moreover has made himself an embarrassment in the eyes of many other nations. He has tarnished America's prestige and crippled it's capability of negotiating with foreign countries and hence should be impeached. 4. To paraphrase your entire argument on nepotism, He doesn't really do it. If he does it, It's harmless and minimal. But it doesn't matter because it's not illegal or impeachable and anyway, Other presidents have done it. So many shifting viewpoints, One could possibly be deceived into thinking your position was weak. Donald Trump has allowed for nepotism into the Whitehouse. These positions given to his daughter and son in law are not insignificant positions and include roles in meeting with foreign leaders and dignitaries as well as advising the president. Neither are qualified, In experience or learning. This is unethical and an abuse of power, And hence Donald Trump should be impeached. 5. Evidence is required to justify such claims. Your conviction of what he may or may not do is not evidence. Nor is your whataboutism on Obama relevant. My point stands. Donald Trump has golfed excessively, At a rate more than any other president. This is a dereliction of duty for which he should be impeached for. For my final remarks, Apparently I must remind you, For the 3rd time, That impeachment under high crimes or misdemeaners is a subjective catch-all category. Every point that I have made is both unimpeachable and impeachable, For the the decision to impeach lies solely at the discretion of congress. This debate was solely to argue whether Donald Trump SHOULD be impeached and to convince readers of that. In the case of nepotism for example, You have said that it is not impeachable. However under the category of high crimes and misdemeanors, Nepotism is an entirely impeachable offense. Furthermore you have failed to argue why nepotism shouldn't be an impeachable offense.