Canada- Clean Air, Filthy People

"First of all, you have previosly called me a nonsensical, violent person. You must be freakin kidding me. For that statement right there, I should hunt you down and give you a beating." I never accused you of this. I specifically said that the way you described your views on Canadians "give off the vibe that you are a nonsensical, violent person." The threat you issued to me therefore clarifies my suspicions of your brash attitude. If I am mistaken, then I suggest you change your attitude. Back to the argument. "They are constantly dirty and reek of B.O. They bathe in their own semen and filth." One can clearly see that this accusation is a far-fetched fallacy. While some Canadians undoubtly are dirty and neglect to wash themselves (as there are in many a' country, as is America), nobody "bathes in their own semen and filth". Come on. Come back to reality for a few minutes here. I could go into an argument about how Canadian women do not bathe in their own semen, as they cannot produce it, or how bathing in semen is beneficial to keeping that golden tan. But I won't, because I'm not going to let my rebuttals become as senseless as yours. "They lived in shacks in the middle of their everlastintg tundra and forests, making them very hard to attack, much like the Ewoks." This is not entirely true. Yes, some of Canada is made up of tundra and deciduous forests, and yes, some Canadians choose to live in these colder areas. However, the larger, more popular sections of Canada are the areas of Ontario and Quebec, which are industrial, domestic, and metropolitan areas. You wont find many Canadians stowing away in shacks here. If there are people living hidden in the tundra, hard to attack, it is most likely that they are hiding from prejudiced hypocrites like yourself. You also make a reference to the Ewoks in this statement. Ewoks, for those of you who don't know, are ficticious chipmunk-like creatures in the Star Wars series. They are hunter-gatherers, and run their own established society. They mean no harm to others, and come to the aid of the Jedi in Star Wars VI-Return of the Jedi. When Princess Leia (co-protagonist) first came in contact with the Ewoks, she wasn't quite sure what to make of them, and was somewhat nervous. However, after getting to know this unknown species, she befriended them, and the Ewoks came to the Jedi's aid because of this. I don't know if you personally know any Canadians, but maybe your situation is one like this; don't judge a book by fallacies and suspicions. Get to know them, and maybe they'll be there when you need them someday. "They breed with their cousins, daughters and mothers." The fallacies strike again; breeding with close family such as daughters and mothers is not possible, for it would result in birth defect. Also, marrying cousins was primarily popular in the South during the 1800's. That went out a long time ago. "If any of you guys ever saw Deliverance, that is Canada." Settings of a movie do not correspond with the reality of that city or country. Take the 1968 horror film, "The Night of the Living Dead". Set in rural Pennsylvana, one fateful night, zombies strike a town, and feast on many innocent people. 40 years later, is Pennsylvania known for its zombie-infested communities? No, because the movie was ficticious. I doubt many people even know that "The Night of the Living Dead" is set in Pennsylvania. My point is that you cannot judge someplace by its dipiction on the big screen. "Everyone of it's citizens are hillbillies and rednecks and their finest." Not all of Canada's population is made up of 'hillbilles and rednecks'. Diversity is prominent in all of Canada, with a widespread of cultures, such as the French, the emigrated American, the frazzled businessman, etc. More importantly, what's wrong with hillbillies and rednecks? Why do you use them as derogatory stereotypes? "They are a godless country that masturbate daily, watch pornographic movies instead of O'Reilly and have sex with family members" This screams informal fallacy. Just digging up more excuses. "Baseball is America's pasttime. Guess what Canada's is. Beastialty. Canada is a country filled with sick morals." Canada's national pasttime is hockey, not bestiality. I doubt any country in their right mind would put bestiality as their national pasttime. Can you provide me a link from where you received this information? I'm quite curious on where you do your research. "Canada has, behind the curtain, been planning out plots to destroy our country. John Wilkes Booth, a Canadian aristocrat. Meaning, he had first dibbs on roadkill. Lee Harvey Oswald, did not kill JFK. A Canadian mountie did on the grassy knoll. Pearl Harbor, not attacked by the Japanese but by those damn canucks. " John Wilkes Booth was not a 'Canadian aristocrat'; he was an American actor, born in Bel Air, Maryland, on May 10th, 1838. He did not kill Abraham Lincoln out of revenge for Canada; he opposed Lincoln's proposal to extend voting rights to recently emancipated slaves. While it is not yet confirmed that Lee Harvey Oswald did assasinate JFK, it couldn't have been a 'Canadian mountie on a grassy knoll', as he was shot in a car in Dallas, Texas, in the middle of a city, far from any grassy knoll. Your accusation that Pearl Harbor was bombed by Canada, rather than Japan, is ridiculous, for the Japanese admitted to bombing the harbor, with satisfaction ridden on their faces. Canada had nothing to do with it. Overall, your rebuttal stuns me-not in the sense that I am amazed by your superior knowledge and intellect, but the fact that you actually can listen to yourself make these utterly disgraceful accusations without batting an eye. You obviously have been led astray in your beliefs. I await your rebuttal.