RESOLVED: An ideal form of No Child Left Behind would be beneficial to the welfare of the USA

RESOLVED: An ideal form of No Child Left Behind would be beneficial to the welfare of the United States. ======================================= DEFINITIONS: ======================================= NCLB: "'The law reauthorized a number of federal programs aiming to improve the performance of U.S. primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for states, school districts, and schools, as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend." As another debater (Yraelz) has stated, the bottom line of such is an aim at improving the performance of U.S. primary and secondary schools. Ideal: • adjective 1 most suitable; perfect. 2 desirable or perfect but existing only in the imagination. • noun 1 a person or thing regarded as perfect. 2 a principle to be aimed for; a standard of perfection. SOURCE:http://www.askoxford.com... ======================================= Observations concerning the resolution ======================================= #1. We must keep in mind that it is merely my task as the instigator to demonstrate how an IDEAL form of the NCLB would be beneficial to the welfare of the USA. In other words, I merely have to show how this system would be beneficial IDEALLY. I'm sure many of you are familiar with the saying that "Communism works ideally." We must keep in mind that 'ideal' explicitly means flawless; we're referring to something which is brimming with perfection. Thus, any attempts by CON to point out any so-called flaws which the NCLB act has had in the past ought to be dismissed immediately without further consideration. #2. To further add on what my job is, I merely have to show that NCLB is in some way beneficial. In other words, even on the off chance my opponent is successful in pointing out any negatives to a perfect form of NCLB (which, for the heck of it, I shall gladly refute anyway), the only way he/she can win while upholding his side of the resolution is to refute the benefits which I ponit out. Thus, without further ado, let us proceed. ======================================= If handled ideally, NCLB would perfectly allow all students to be successfully educated, hence improving being beneficial the US welfare. ======================================+ For quite some time, US schooling have been suffering all kinds of problems in terms of the lack of education. There is a reason we are considered a laughing stock in comparison to other countries. I propose that with a perfect form of NCLB law, education would be improved. Education is most certainly beneficial given that it allows individuals to ascertain more knowledge as well as be more capable of dealing with society. In addition, ideally, we are guarenteed a system with no setbacks. I reserve the right to introduce new arguments in the next round should I find such necessary. And that shall be all for now. In the next round, my opponent is probably going to call my case abusive (as people generally seem to be of the impression that seemingly unwinnable debates = abuse), ask for me to explain the details of a perfect form of NCLB or just focus on citing precedent. I'll gladly respond to such objections, however, as you will find out soon enough . . . none of these objections shall have any influence on this debate. Till the next round. :D