Christians Deceived US On Harm Caused By CSA With Intent To Suppress Premarital Sex

Terms to know: ECWRGs- Evil Christian Women"s Rights Groups Let"s begin". "Since this country began, the Christian Right/Conservatives have been attempting to mold the American Society to conform with their interpretation of God's Law." The interpretation of god"s law is vast and ununiformed, there is absolutely no collective effort to do the conspiracy you claim You say, since the beginning of this nation"s creation conservatives have been attempting to conform the rest of the country. A few facts, one is that Conservative is a vague word and you must define it. Here is the link to a site which has 20 definitions of the word conservatism, I believe you mean the one listed in 3 or 4, please specify. 3 and 4 are really the only ones which don"t logically eliminate themselves in this context. 1.An aversion to rapid change; a belief that tradition and prevailing social norms often contain within them handed down wisdom; and mistrust of attempts to remake society so that it conforms to an abstract account of what would be just or efficient. 2.A desire to preserve the political philosophy and rules of government articulated in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. 3.A belief that it is imperative to preserve traditional morality, as it is articulated in the Bible, through cultural norms. 4.A belief that it is imperative to preserve traditional morality, as it is articulated in the Bible, using cultural norms and the power of the state. 5.An embrace of free-market capitalism, and a belief in the legitimacy of market outcomes. http://www.theatlantic.com... You are exclusively talking about the religious aspect of conservatism. Which really means that you aren"t talking about conservatism at all, you are talking about Christianity. Specifically, a Christian conspiracy attempt to preserve innocence for marriage. We know that you aren"t talking about Conservatism because the definition of it would be, to stick with traditional values-in most cases. Traditional values of this time however accepted the acts of child sex and had no problem with it, so it was in fact this was very liberal movement was it not? Christianity does not equate to conservative outlook if that is what you are trying to say. Christianity is not unified Christianity is not a unified force, working to some conspiracy goal, you obviously aren"t aware of the huge social divisions between Christian sects all over the world. There are 33,820 denominations with 3,445,000 congregations/churches worldwide, and to say that they are all somehow in agreement to act on issues together is a ridiculous hyperbole. If you think we have just look back to 1830"s when political tension between Mormons and opposing sects which lead to what is now known as the Missouri Mormon War this lead to the issuing of executive order 44 (since called the extermination order within the LDS community) by Missouri governor Lilburn Boggs, which declared that "the Mormons must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the State. For many more examples of this visit: ( http://en.wikipedia.org... )".You have fantastical ideas about Christian cooperation and control. Your beliefs border on conspiracy really. The real story of the London prostitution "craze" The groups who promoted raising the age of consent were women"s rights groups, who saw the inequality in London and the disgusting situation concerning prostitution. They were not specifically any Christian group, everyone then was Christian but they weren"t specifically any Christian organ. On another note, the reason that marriage exemptions exist today for marriage is because not everyone agreed on the Crazy idea that having sex with children was wrong. They rationalized their acts then, by using the guise of marriage and god as people usually do to justify child rape. Women have had a hard enough time just getting the right to vote, they couldn"t have simply, completely eliminated the perversion prevalent in traditional society, obviously the men are going to resist and still find a way to get what they according to your view "entitled to". Your rights as male As a man, you have no right to dictate over a girl. You cannot understand what it is like to be a girl, you need to get off of your high horse and step away from foreign ground which you have no sovereignty over. You Don"t understand what a girl would or would not like or how she would feel, so you need to stop your attempts at dictating their lives. Sex with children damages them This might be hard to believe but sex with children is bad for them. I would like to state that the Pro side, claims that ECWRGs have employed the help of experts in psychology and doctors to promote their findings in support of their agenda. However, why would doctors and psychologist lie and falsify studies, and why is it that the supposed lies would go unchallenged by the rest of the scientific community? I contend that he has practically admitted that sex with children causes harm because psychologist and Christians rights groups have different agendas. Sex with children promotes sexism and inequality. When men are accustomed to sleeping with little girls, they lose respect for them as they mature into adults and can no longer view them as more than sexual objects. No consideration to the child has been mentioned This guy never says that child sex is bad, but what is worse, he never considers how the child feels in his entire argument. What exactly is he worried about in that case? Male rights being violated by evil Christian women"s rights groups? Men losing their right to children"s bodies? Think about that. This guy just went on an 8 minuet rant about how child sex is alright because of x, y, and z. But he absolutely never considered how his beliefs made the child feel, The only thing he said about physical damage was the equivalent of "Nun-Uh, this is just a conspiracy by ECWRG and evidence was covered up" and then provided no evidence to counter the consensus. He spat political garb and never once considered the impact on the children. Marriage exemptions He implied that we have such strict rules about child sex but that the big secret is that they can just marry and then have sex anyway, therefore, he said, we can see that child sex is not actually wrong it is just the way that the ECWRG (Evil Christian Women"s Rights Groups) promoted their ideology on purity. Here is the age of consent and marriage laws in the US: (http://en.wikipedia.org... ) Almost all of them say you can"t marry a minor. I was surprised that more states than I anticipated state that with parents" permission and legal permission adults and minors can marry and therefore have sex (keep in mind not all of these states allow sex during marriage as only 27 states have the exemption clause). Now let"s be rational for a second and think about how many courts would really allow a: 5, 8, 11, 13 year old girl to marry to an adult? Is there a child marital exemption, yes, would the courts allow the marriage in the first place, I say Hell no. Basically, although the wording of the laws allows child sex and marriage, People in our culture and in the government wouldn"t let that happen. There is no secret exemption that was allowed because of the ulterior motives of Big Woman, it was men, and women"s rights groups have helped change the way that we view this topic. We have a semi-decent system in place to keep the corrupt pedophile from having his way. Question Do you believe that crimes against children can be considered worse than equal crimes on adults? I have 2 more things to say which I will post in the comments section......