Should creationism be taught in schools? (Evolution vs Creation)

"we are not debating on whether or not creationism is backed by science or not, we are debating whether or not we should teach a fundamental religious principle to kids" You're not actually following the debateI mentioned this in the first round:"My opponent will try to disprove this that creationism can be a viable explanation for our existance"Viable means capable of working and realistic, creationism is not capable of working in today's society due to proof pointing towards the theory of evolution. You have not proved that creationism is viable at all. You have given me NO evidence what so ever to back up Creationism. By not being taught in schools, I meant it should not be taught like Evolution. I guess it could be mentioned in social studies a few times but not going too in depth into this concept. Creationism in schools should just be taught as a FALSE explanation for our existance. You have mentioned that I can disprove creation but many people will still believe in it. The problem here is that we should NOT teach our children that creationism is logical. In schools, creationism should be mentioned that it has no proof to back it up and that Evolution is far more logical and realistic to explain part of our origins. If we teach kids more about evolution and evidence, we can lower the amount of people who still hold the idea of creationism. Creationists are people who deny science and reality in replace of their fictional tales. You have not ever shown why Creation is a viable model at all. You may have mentioned it was but with nothing to back it up. You accused me of disproving Creation with science, but science is not fictional. Science is real, therefor I disproved Creation with reality. You are not mentioning why creation is viable and realistic. You are quite confusing me on this debate. When people refer to creation being taught in schools, they talk about creationism being taught as an idea of how we came here alongside Evolution. They refer that it should be taught like Evolution should, you're confusing me with your definitions. You have ignored the main purpose of the debate and just mention that Creation has effected us and people believe in it. Schools are not ChurchWe should not go too in depth about religious beliefs in schools unless it has something to do with history. If one wants to learn about religion, there are churches, mosks, temples and ect. to teach about religion. Is school a church? No. In schools, creationism should only be mentioned as a false tale that people used to believe and some people still do today. Creationism should only be mentioned in two scenarios. A) Creationism has something to do with history in social studies classB) Students are learning about evolution. In this case, creation should be taught as a folklore which is disproven by the scientific theory of Evolution. It should be mentioned as a nonsensical belief, we should teach students who are religious to accept the model of theistic evolution. Even so, we shouldn't go too in depth about the Creation vs Evolution debate in school. sources. http://archive.adl.org...http://lilt.ilstu.edu...ConclusionPro has given realitively repetitive and confusing arguments and not has he once proved that Creation is a viable model for our existance. I have given examples on why Evolution is a viable model for where Homo Sapiens came from. I have also provided more sources than pro has.