Black Privilege Is Real

The noun definition: a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, Advantage, Or favor. Okay. White Privilege: The societal privilege that benefits people whom society identifies as white in some countries, Beyond what is commonly experienced by non-white people under the same social, Political, Or economic circumstances. It is generally agreed to refer to the implicit or systemic advantages that white people have relative to people who are the objects of racism; it is the absence of suspicion and other negative reactions that people who are objects of racism experience. Such a big definition. In most cases the longer something takes to explain the more it tends to be wrong. "benefits" requires another definition. If you mean wealth benefits then I would say it is not their fault that there parents work in higher earnings jobs and/or save money for the future. "Systemic" this requires evidence. Burden of proof since you are making the claim that whites have a systemic privilege over black. That requires a specific law. This can also be twisted in the favour to me. I can change few words and state there is black privilege but I won't instead I would state you gave me the definition and did not use to state inherent privileges that white people do have. Isn't Lebron James one of the richest people alive? Yeah, So is Bill Gates. Note you clearly missed out race is not a determining factor which is why I was limited to the some ways blacks are priveleged. In being born black. Black as the race is only identified in the colour of their skin. Saying anything other then they are priveleged in being black for definition of black privilege would be misrepresenting what the words mean. Note from your definition if you take the two words apart you get. White: a person belonging to a light-skinned race (Merriam Webster)Privilege: a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, Advantage, Or favor. If we join these two together we get advantage of light skin. Everything else falls into different categories. Reason is not all white people are the same apart from the colour of their skin being lighter then brown and black people. Meaning by you generalising more then the colour of someone's skin is misleading and is getting to much meaning at the colour of someone's skin. So are you saying all celebrities are privileged? Yes as in they are famous or a celebrated person. Celebrity: a famous or celebrated person (Merriam Webster)Then look them up for yourself. I am supposed to find sources that you used? That is not how it works. When you use a source. You leave a link or something to indicate where you got it from. This has to be bad conduct since I am not asking Con to find my sources. I clearly laid them out and Con decided he would not give the same standard I showed him. It seems as if you are going in a society angle. This was a problem in earlier debates and it seems you have not learnt. If you asked me what I meant before asking for a debate we would not require to a debate. Instead you did not simply ask questions on my stances or definitions instead you made this into a debate. I do not see how this could not have been cleared up in the comment section but oh well. Oh wait, You can't because it isn't a thing. Black people have been oppressed for a very long time and we tend to be at a disadvantage. Police brutality is another point. You are simply mistaken. If white privilege is a thing then black privilege is also a thing. The thing is I will not find greater meaning in two words put together with what you defined white privilege to be since I am not basing a lot on a person's skin colour. A better phrase then white privilege is ancestry privilege. Black: having dark skin, Hair, And eyes (Merriam Webster)Privilege: a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, Advantage, Or favorPeople who have an advantage of darker skin. Prime example of white privilege and to show how black privilege is not real. From what I read from your sources you have committed an anecdotal fallacy. This is due to you using two anecdotes to paint a picture of two races. This is misrepresenting every single race of black and white people. I could do the same and show evidence showing otherwise but then I would be doing the same fallacy you are committing. So I will not. Anecdotal fallacy: The anecdotal fallacy is when someone bases an argument on anecdotal evidence. Anecdotal evidence is evidence based solely on the personal experience of one person or a small number of people. Now compare that case, To the black man who stole some ribs. Prime example of white privilege, There's no way around that. I understand that you aren't denying white privilege but this just shows how prevalent white privilege is and this just proves how your claim on "Black privilege" is stupid as h*ll. You have also mislead the readers and me with information that was important in why the black man was sentenced for 50 years. They took into account the laws that were in place (habitual offenders) and what it means. What it meant was that they took into account nine previous convictions. You did not represent the facts properly and told a half truth or was misleading. Next time fact check sources so that you do not fall prey to Fake news. The source is below if you are wondering into where I got this information. Fake news: Fake news is a type of yellow journalism or propaganda that consists of deliberate disinformation or hoaxes spread via traditional print and broadcast news media or online social media. Source: https://www. Snopes. Com/fact-check/50-years-ribs-theft/I don't need to learn anything new. I think you do and hopefully you do learn something new. At least do not fall prey to fake news and fact check sources. Do not take news as the truth until you have fact checked it since a reliable source in the past does not mean it will be reliable in the future.