The Bible teaches that certain dances are sinful.

The off-pointedness of the last argument Con made a number of points in his last argument; however, most of them had nothing to do with showing the proposition to be false. Below is a chart examining how much emphasis (by number of sentences used) Con put to each point (in no particular order): 1) Dancing in general is outside the scope of this debate. 2) Regardless of how much my views fit or don’t fit that of the world of Happy Feet’s, it does not in any way indicate that the proposition is true or false. 3) We both agree that religious dancing is wrong; also, it is outside the scope of this debate. 4) We agree not to continue in sin. 5) We agree that Christians are not under the Old Testament. 6) There is nothing for me to rebut in regards to Con’s closing sentences, obviously. 7) I need not rebut Con’s apologies that I feel the way I do about dancing. All of the following in consideration, Caramelldansen is really the only thing pertaining to falsifying the proposition. While there clearly could be a small margin of error (e.g., what qualifies as a “sentence” or measurement errors), this would mean that less than 10% of what Con said (measuring by sentence) even attempts debunk the proposition! On a pie chart, it looks like this: Debunking the 8% To debunk the 8%, let me bring it up: As for Charamellden, why does Pro think it's an adult visual novel? If anime is an adult visual novel, then no one should read it. Some anime are dirty and some are family oriented like Flying House and Superbook. The answer to your question (i.e., “… [W]hy does Pro think it's an adult visual novel?”) is that the source I gave directly says it’s an adult visual novel. Let me bring it up: According to Ruakuu’s Blog, The origin of Caramelldansen was the flash loop composed by Sven from Sweden at the first half on 2006, and it was originally posted on his personal website. Its visual source is an animated gif taken from an opening movie of the Japanese adult visual novel Popotan released in 2002. This animated gif of bunny dance was entitled “Popotan dance” and had existed on the web since before 2005.[1] Even a simple lookup of Popotan on Wikipedia will demonstrate this: Popotan (|13;|13;{83;|35;?) is a Japanese adult visual novel developed by Petit Ferret with character designs by Akio Watanabe under the alias Poyoyon Rock. … Gameplay in Popotan follows a semi-predetermined plot; major events remain the same, but personal storylines can diverge from the player's choices. The game focuses on protagonist Chris, a drifter who meets three girls and their maid in a mansion near the ruins of Tokyo in the distant future. The player's goal is to make available sexual scenes and images that the player can view or replay at any time depicting the protagonist having sexual intercourse with one of the girls. The player can pursue other girls once they have finished one of the sisters' storylines.[2] There you have it. The mature background of the dance (mature being a euphemism for immature and lewd, of course), the bunny ears (the sexual connotation of which has already been discussed), the flamboyant hip swings (a part of the body that should not be flaunted, as discussed earlier)—this is not a dance that a Christian should be partaking in. The Argentine tango What happened to the Argentine tango? Con did not say a single word on it in the last argument. In the entire debate so far, the only thing he said about it was, “I don't see anything wrong with it. It only shows expression for love.” He had plenty of characters remaining in his previous argument, so he certainly could have attempted to answer what I have said in regards to it. While I have exposed the Argentine tango indirectly—dealing much with the waltz and concluding that the Argentine tango is no better—I have not thoroughly dealt with it directly. Consider this text: I came up with the "Permission Seduction™" concept because I discovered that so many people are yearning for satisfying intimacy with the opposite sex, but are unconsciously held back by decades of political correctness, professionalism, and family responsibility. When I returned to the U.S. after many years in Italy, I heard so many sighs and complaints here from both singles and married people about their frustrations with their intimate or romantic lives. (Today Italians, like other Europeans, are not very different in this way from North Americans.)[3] In other words, the author is discussing the sexual desire “that so many people are yearning for.” The author is saying that they need a way to satisfy their sexual cravings (i.e., get close to having sex without actually “going all the way”—a subject that has already been shown to be what the Greek word aselgeia, a word listed among various sins, refers to). Below is the author’s solution: I thought, "IF ONLY THEY KNEW what was in store for them the moment they cross that threshold into a room filled with tango music! If only they knew that in that room, the woman who ignored you at Starbucks (or even your wife with whom you may have settled into a routine) is going to stand tall like a queen before you when you approach her to dance, wrap herself around you and snuggle up to your cheek and your chest - but this will happen only IF you've earned her confidence in your skill at the language of tango." I thought, "It's a kind of seduction, isn't it? Seduction in a safe context, seduction where the boundaries are clear for your 12 minute 'date' on the dance floor."[3] The author “developed a highly effective series of learning modules that get excellent results for people who want to learn to dance well from the start.” Because the purpose is seductive, the system was aptly named the “Permission Seduction™ Tango Learning System.”[3] Clearly, the dance involves sexual pleasure and is thus (unless it’s a husband and wife at home or something, of course) against the teachings of the Bible. The bump Like with the Argentine tango, Con said nothing about the bump in his last argument. I will again acknowledge that even the definition in given in Round 1 acknowledges that “bumping hip to backside” is “intimate” (who wouldn’t think that?)—not referring to being “friendly,” of course, but to being lustful—lewd. Again, is this not the case? Conclusion Using the principles of “indecent bodily movements” and the “unchaste handling of males and females” will show that many of the dances of today—almost all of them—“are primarily designed … for the express purpose of arousing the passions and destroying the purity of both sexes. The different suggestive movements of each new dance are thoroly studied, and their effects well known, before they are introduced to the public by these wretches who wield such a deadly in@258;uence on the youth of our land.”[4] Extrabiblical references [1] Reference 4 from my last argument [2] https://en.wikipedia.org... [3] Reference 7 from my last argument [4] Reference 3 from my last argument