American Abortion is a method of Racial Eugenics

I don't watch propaganda - it's bad for the brain. Also I have had too many commands to watch shoddy YouTube videos from tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorists... As such I make it a policy not to watch anything unless it comes from a reliable source. That said this isn't about my personal habits this is about rebutting your points and making my final argument. So let's get to it! 1.) The first and most important issue here is you keep uttering the same things, but you never bother including any proof to your allegations. Exactly what are the "racist" origins of Planned Parenthood? No where have you shown that, whereas I have actually proved that Sanger wasn't apparently racist. Endorsing Eugenics =/= Racism, because Eugenics = Classicism. And even beyond that you haven't shown proof of how Planned Parenthood was ever a Eugenics group? You can't use pro-life propaganda as proof, because for example there are people like James O'Keefe who is famous for faking footage toward a Right-Wing agenda. His most recent and spectacular case is the ACORN tapes where apparently he dressed as a pimp and received help in sexual traffic of a prostitute. Except the unedited tapes prove that wrong. Something tells me something similar is happening here. As for the Margaret Sanger awards - they are given to those who demonstrate great leadership and integrity. And two of the first recipients are Martin Luther King Jr. and Lyndon B. Johnson - and those two were neither stupid nor racist against black people. Did you know Coretta King accepted for MLK Jr. and that in a speech he wrote he said that he and Sanger had quote: "a striking kinship between our movement (Civil Rights) and [her] early efforts". Unless the Civil Rights Movement was about killing poor black people I'm inclined to believe your points are factually incorrect. 2.) Sanger never bragged about meeting the Clan. She merely gave an account in her book about how far she was willing to go to spread her ideas of female reproductive rights. One of those encounters happened to be with a female support group for the Klan - not the actual KKK. Which of course, it would not be - Sanger spoke at many black churches and to many black women groups and even at black schools. And in the same book you claim to quote she spoke well of their enthusiasm and self-motivation. Even Edwin Black who wrote "War Against the Weak" firmly states that quote, "Sanger was no racist. Nor was she anti-Semitic." Also it should be noted here that no Planned Parenthood chapter offered abortions until 1970 (4 years after Sanger) died... which makes sense considering she hated abortions... as I noted above. It comes back to your points lacking proof and substance and relying on twisting the facts of Sanger's life. It is true that she was a Eugenicist, but so to was W.E.B. Dubois (with his blasted 10%) and Theodore Roosevelt (who did quite a bit of good). And both were heavily politically active in nature. So should we by your logic therefore view the results of their efforts as racist and therefore evil? Are national parks a scourge designed to kill black babies? Are educated blacks a sign of a conspiracy to abort the African-American group from America? Of course not, and it's silly to behave as though such were so. 3/4.) And looking at Eugenics it's self... there is no one path leading to it's goals. Forced sterilization is one path - and it is a path multiple groups have taken. And that includes Israel forcible (but sneakily) destroying the ability of Ethiopian Jews to reproduce. That said it doesn't have to work that way, and even if it did you are factually wrong. Eugenics is classicism not racism. And as I said there are moral reasons to consider the path of Eugenics. Should someone who has the mental ability of a 3 year old really be allowed to reproduce? Can they care for a child? Will the child be retarded as well? Considering the potential for abuse (particularly neglect) it would seem better to simply prevent the situation entirely. Eugenics would seek to prevent that happening, which is why it was mostly the Progressive crowd (the folks who pushed for 40 hour weeks, banning child labor, and Prohibition) backed it. 5.) Finally I have to urge you not to put words in my mouth - Sanger give no indications of having been racist and you have no proof she was. She was a proponent of Eugenics, but that had little to do with either abortions (1970 remember) or a dislike of the black community (original patient population was white females... like her mother). In short, you are factually incorrect and have nothing to prove otherwise. As such ALL VOTERS SHOULD VOTE CON. Thanks to my opponent for participating and thank you to anyone who bothered reading through this. Good day! http://www.politifact.com... http://www.redstate.com... https://sangerpapers.wordpress.com... https://archive.org... http://www.plannedparenthood.org... http://en.wikipedia.org...