The Big Bang Theory

Thanks for the challenge! Good luck!First I have to clarify that not understanding science doesn't mean science is false. That being said, let's begin. Part 1 Where did the spec come from? Actually it can be two things. 1) It didn't came from anything. Maybe there was nothing before, just that eternal spec. I know what you are thinking, but what created that spec? Well, nothing. It is not illogical to think it may be eternal and without a genesis. Like if it was a sort of "god". God also is eternal, according to its believers. 2) It came from a previous universe. What seems more probable nowadays is that universes expand, then get togheter again, and expend again, in a kind of cycle.I should clarify that forces aren't things but actions. Asking "where did all that force go?" is like asking "after I greeted you, where did the greeting go?". Obviously absurd."you got a spec of matter, containing all the gravity in the whole universe" This isn't scientifically right. In the singularity, non of the laws of physics applied, so gravity didn't existed. A deeper explanation: Gravity is an interaction between two body. In the singularity there was a single body (singularity!hahah), so no gravity. "All the gravity in the universe isn't strong enough to hold off this force that doesn't exist causing it to expand?" Actually gravity is a rather weak force so this isn't illogical." If it was still here, the earth would fly around in little bits, it doesn"t have the gravity of the whole universe, and that isn"t enough to hold a spec together that is under this force, how is the earth able to?" This is almost a joke. That force is the one which makes the universe expand. The gravity serves as a way of keeping bodies arranged in a certain way, but they still move cause the universe is expanding.Part 2"And how did these particles form? Each exactly like its own kind, with trillions to the trillionth power to the trillionth power and so on of these particles, every particle in the universe without fail, each come out exactly like other particles of their types?Every electron is equal in mass to every other electron, every down quark is exactly equal to every other down quark, every particle equal EXACTLY to every other particle of their type.How?" This could mean a few things. 1) Coincidence. Not too much to explain, just luck. 2) A deterministic Universe. In the words of Hawking: "At this time, the Big Bang, all the matter in the universe, would have been on top of itself. The density would have been infinite. It would have been what is called, a singularity. At a singularity, all the laws of physics would have broken down. This means that the state of the universe, after the Big Bang, will not depend on anything that may have happened before, because the deterministic laws that govern the universe will break down in the Big Bang. The universe will evolve from the Big Bang, completely independently of what it was like before. Even the amount of matter in the universe, can be different to what it was before the Big Bang, as the Law of Conservation of Matter, will break down at the Big Bang. " 3) Multiverses exists. Some scientists, like Michio Kaku, propose that the universe divides in each choice. For instance, when you flip a coin the universe divides in two: in one universe you get tails, in the other heads. This would mean that there are plenty of universes, this is the one where electrons are equal and so on, but in other universes things are way different.Part 3The creation of atoms is scientifically explained. They formed like that because of the laws of physics. They formed like that because it was the only way. Is like saying "the key entered the lock horizontally, that's amazing! Why didn't it enter vertically". It isn't amazing, it entered horizontally because that was the only way of putting the key in the lock.Part 4 What pulls atoms togheter is electromagnetic force. Atoms don't get pulled all togheter because of attraction and repulsion forces. Some get togheter because of they attract each other, and some don't because they repulse each other .Part 5This part doesn't give any reason why the big bang is illogical. However keep in mind that, although it's called big bang, it wasn't an explosion so things expand different than in an explosion.Conclusion There are plenty of reason to believe in the Big Bang. Though it has some flaws, It is the better system proposed. If Con doesn't think so, then I invite him to show his own theory.Sources and reading suggestions for Con: http://www.hawking.org.uk...;- Stephen Hawking The Feynman Lectures on Physics - Richard P. Feynman Hyperspace - Michio Kaku http://bigthink.com...;- Michio Kaku