Conservatism vs Liberalism!

So I see that this round Yeet has identified three major concerns he has: 1. Bernie Sanders 2. Healthcare/Obamacare 3. The effects of fracking 1. I agree with Yeet that Bernie Sanders will not be able to pay for the programs he has suggested. However, you are unfairly calling Bernie Sanders a liar (and as a supporter of his I don't appreciate you saying that his supporters "will eat anything up". Criticize the politician not his/her followers). i. The fact that a politician won't be able to pay for the services and programs that they say they would provide is not new. If we are talking about a far-left candidate, we should also talk about a certain far-right candidate. I see from your previous debates that you support Trump. Trump is jus as much of a "liar" as Sanders. How is Trump going to deport Mexicans and Muslims, and more importantly how is he going to finance the wall he is proposing to build? To be clear, this is not part of my argument and I don't want it to be debated in THIS debate. I am just trying to say that one should never hold ANY politician to their word. ii. The over-arching idea here is that it doesn't matter what politicians CAN do, it is what they WOULD WANT to do. Trump is saying that he would remove potential terrorists from our country. Sanders is saying that he wants to make college free. I doubt that anyone thinks that Trump will actually build a wall. I also doubt that anyone believes that Bernie will do anything that he say he will. The experienced voter knows that it is not the actions that the politicians wish to pursue that are important, it is the IDEAS that the politicians have. 2. Many people do not like Obamacare, and I am not surprised that you don't either. I am also not surprised that your arguments against Obamacare are invalid. i. You say that insurance premiums have doubled and tripled under Obamacare. In reality, 'factcheck.org' (http://www.factcheck.org...) says that insurance "premiums, where most Americans have coverage, are not "skyrocketing," and neither are health care costs. In fact, the growth of both has been at historically low rates in the past few years." I suggest that Yeet check his/her sources. ii. When someone doesn't have insurance, it costs much more taxpayer money. If an uninsured driver gets into a serious accident and requires surgery, the government would have to pay much more than if the person was already insured. There is a good reason why those who don't have healthcare are fined, because if they don't it costs the rest of us much more money for their emergency needs. iii. Obamacare has insured over 16.4 million people (according to http://www.hhs.gov...). 3. Yeet also supports fracking, which I find disturbing. He/she is correct in saying that it provides many economic benefits, but there is a significant economic cost to this. The New York Times found that 18m gallons of oil and toxic wastewater have been spilled between January 2006 to October 2014 in North Dakota due to fracking. Although rarely, the NPR found that fracking causes earthquakes. Plus, we need to get away from non-renewable energy resources and move towards a more sustainable energy source or sources. I think this is more of a personal choice, and there is a plethora of supporting statistics for each side. Arguing whether or not fracking is good is similar to argue whether or not God is real: It is such a contentious topic that it would be pointless to debate it. To recap: (1) Criticize a politicians message, not the programs that they want to implement; (2) Obamacare has been more beneficial than many people think; and (3) fracking is generally good for the economy but we need to weigh the environmental impacts against the economic benefits. Although I enjoy debating nearly any topic, I would like to stick to conservatism vs. liberalism. NYT: http://www.nytimes.com... (It's a good read) NPR: https://stateimpact.npr.org...