The cause of a zombie apocalypse

Secondly, I would once again refute my opponents' claims Con used three definitions, one used by Dictionary. com, and one by the Merriam-Webster dictionary. Dictionary. com is actually more of a search engine more than it is a dictionary, and it is not a reliable source for definitions. This would lead to my first refutation. Because of my opponent's invaluable source, we will not take into consideration that a zombie is "a person whose behavior or responses are wooden, listless or seemingly rote. Although, we will consider his other two definitions. I too used the Merriam-Webster dictionary for my definitions, because of it's reputation and accuracy. I reasonably picked the best example of a zombie, as being someone that "may enter into an reanimate a dead body. " Con's definitions are irrelevant to this topic. 1) A person held to resemble the so called walking dead This example would show how in the walking dead, the "walkers" were people who used to be alive but were dead, because of a similar pandemic to the example that i had. It would counter Con's claim that zombies were people who were insane. 2) A person markedly strange in appearance of behavior. Firstly, i thought this was a typo so I did some research and found it is "appearance OR behavior. " I would fully go against the use of this definition even though it would support my claim more than my opponent's. By having different appearance or behavior, this definition puts multiple possibilities on what a zombie even is. It can be a person from outer space, a person of a different religion, a mentally challenged person, etc. The definition is not thorough enough in which it doesn't explain that it is strange compared to what? If it is a human, zombies look more similar to humans than a snake, so therefore according to this definition a snake would also be a zombie. "The zombies in my scenario are not dead or reanimated. They are listless in their behavior" Although I rebutted the first definition by a faulty source, I will accept it. Even if that were to be true, he has 3 other definitions, one of mine, and two of his own, which would contradict this. So the "zombies in [his] scenario" would not be zombies at all, by definition. "There is no pure distinction of who is a zombie and who is not. " Once again, I rebutted Con's third definition that there are multiple possibilities for "a person markedly strange in appearance of behavior. " My opponent would be contradicting his own statement by saying this. How can a person be strange in appearance or behavior if there is no pure distinction between zombie and not zombie (which i infer to be human)? "Zombies are irrational and unwilling to farm, or hunt. " I understand that they would be unwilling to farm, but to hunt? Wouldn't finding and attacking human homes be classified as Hunting & Gathering? __________ Summary A virus is the most plausible way to start the deadliest zombie apocalypse. By genetically mutating, the virus would be able to travel through any chemical of oxygen. While there, it can infect CO2, which plants breath, and can infect the plants. Plants, after going through photosynthesis by light, Infected CO2 and H2O, would create an infected oxygen. Through there, humans would not have a reliable source of air, and through cell respiration will create more and more of the virus. Due to the virus's rapid spread, there will be no time to find a cure and stop it. By the time they do, it will be too late. My opponent's view is that the loss of electricity would create a zombie apocalypse, but throughout the debate I refuted his arguments and used his own definitions to my advantage. Lastly, I would like to end with this "Currently there is neither enough reliance on electricity, nor a virus that would cause a zombie apocalypse. " We should be grateful that we have experienced neither causes, and a zombie apocalypse is not occurring right now. :) I thank my opponent Josh_B for a great debate that I truly enjoyed, and put hard time and effort for a great cause. Let the better cause win!