The Cosmological Claim. There is a supernatural creator, not constrained within time, that created a

This is a very difficult matter to argue in only 5 rounds, because confusion at one single assumption renders the rest of the argument useless until the conflict point is resolved. Therefore, I would like to just focus on Assumption 1 for now. Time is simply stated as a record of the order of occurrences- no matter who the observer is, or where they are, or how fast they are traveling, if Event A happens before Event B, then Event A has preceded Event B in time according to that observer. Now, let us assume there is an observer that is "stationary", and he observes Event X prior to Event Y. It can be concluded that Event X occurred at a time before Event Y, relative to his perception. Next, let"s assume there is a perceiver that can travel faster than the speed of light. (relative to the first person). If we assume Einstein"s theory of relativity to be correct, he will actually be traveling backward in time (relative to the first person). Therefore, according to his perception, Event Y will actually precede Event X, in the exact opposite order of the first person"s observations! Now, why is this important? It is important because we must realize that, regardless of position/speed, a relative timeline exists in our natural world for each perceiver. Let"s bring up another hypothetical situation. Let"s assume there is a world with mass that exists in a given space, yet the mass does not move (it is completely and utterly stationary). Does a time-line exist? Well, because there is only one event that just is, it can be said that there is no such thing as a time-line, but a time point, regardless of how fast an observer is traveling. The last hypothetic case I will use to support my argument is this. Let"s say there exists mass in a constant state (no movement whatsoever) at a particular time. We will call this The Beginning. We will assume mass did not exist before The Beginning because The Beginning was infinite. But wait, we just proved that time (according to our reference point) does not pass without movement, but only exists as a time point. (If time, according to our reference point, passed without movement than every single second on earth could actually be an eternity according to our reference point; but obviously that is contradictory) Therefore, The Beginning could not be infinite, but a moment in time. Therefore, we have to conclude that each observer"s perception of time had to A) Always include constantly moving mass with events prior and prior and prior" forever; or B) Movement was stationary at The Beginning (according to each observer) and thus time began at this Beginning Point. We cannot have infinite time without infinite movement. Either B is correct, and we can move on to assumption 2, or you would agree that there has been constant events that have occurred prior to every event that has ever occurred (according to every observers perception). And since my original assumption 1 (in round 1) proves that events could not have continually occurred prior to this moment (since then this moment would never have reached an occurring point), we have to accept "B".