it is impossible for an infinite amount of universes to exist

I would like to begin my rebuttal by Thanking my opponent for his argument, although I do see flaws in it. In this section of the debate I will be attacking my opponents case. If have time I will rebuild my own case and show you how there can be, in fact, multiple universes. My opponent begins his first argument by asking you to consider his premisses: 1. no matter how many of something exists, there could always be one more. 2. an infinite number of universes exist He then continues to state: in order for the above premises to be true you must conclude that you could have more than an infinite amount of universes. this is a contradiction because there is no such thing as "more than infinity". This is completely false. The word infinite, as described in my definitions states, extending indefinitely or endless. I do say yes that you can't have more than infinite but you can in fact have infinite. The fact that the debate is about "an infinite amount of universes" and not "more than infinite" shows that this argument is invalid. In fact you do not need to conclude that more than infinite exist. "more than" is not needed in that statement. This therefore renders his argument useless. The rest of his argument revolves around this "more than" explanation. This means the rest of his argument is false as well. In this round he has attacked my case by stating: i find your first 2 points ultimately irrelevant. this isnt a debate about whether or not other universes can exist. in fact, i agree that multiple universes may exist, just not an infinite amount of them. I would like to state that my first two points are completely relevant. My fist one states that there may be a size to the universe. With the ever expanding space there may be even more universes. Here is classifications of our known space from smallest to largest. Worlds (Earth), Galaxy (Milky Way), Universe. By classification logic we can conclude that there may be yet another stage in the list. Thereby creating the space for an infinite number of galaxies. Contention 2 explains that there is no way known to man to find out the answer to the debate topic. We dont know therefore it is not impossible for multiple universe, or infinite universe to exist. By the way this is in fact a debate on whether or not more universes may exist. I am debating that more universes may exist beyond our comprehension. Hence the term infinite, which is just a human concept. My opponent then states the following; in your 3rd point, you make two relevant claims, but dont offer a justification for either: 1. "there may be an infinite number of universes" 2. "there is an infinite number of possibilities and therefore an infinite number of universes. " -ive already proven how 1 is impossible, and would like to see you find a hole in that proof. -as for 2, you havent given proof for it, and if i have proven a statement that contradicts 2, then 2 must not be true. I admit that I made to relevant claims. Which you continue to ramble on about how you disproved them. This is not true because I have proved earlier that your main argument is invalid. By that logic my third point stands. You have not in fact disproved number 2. There is no statement proving that there is not an infinite number of possibilities in todays world. Therefore with an infinite number of possibilities, you can conclude an infinite number of universes. Again, as I am running out of characters I thank my opponent for the debate. I wish him good luck as the Voting begins. Thank you very much for reading my side of the debate.