Occam's Razor can successfully defend the existence of God

My opponent seems to not understand the resolution at hand. The resolution is Occam's Razor Defends the Existence of God. My opponent makes barely a mention of Occam's Razor in his argument and then proceeds to make arguments that are not relevent to the debate. In reading his argument, he states things that are very complicated for your average person to understand. I myself am not a scientific mind, but that in no way makes me a simpleton as many scientific atheists would have you believe. Again, Occam's Razor states that the simplest answer to a phenomena is often times the best. The best answer should be the accepted answer. As you can see, my opponent has made things anything but simple. Therefore his scientific reasoning should not be accepted as truth. With that said I will not attempt to touch many of my opponent's points because: A. I have already in the previous paragraph explained how he complicates things with his scientific reasoning. B. A lot of what he says has nothing to do with the resolution brought on by me. Axiom 1, Everything has cause, is false This can easily be remedied by my assertion that God created everything because he wanted to. It is simple and to the point. Occam's Razor supports this. Axiom 2 has the same answer. The cause for everything, the universe, as stated by Pastor Warren in The Purpose Driven Life is, for God's enjoyment. Axiom 3 AND my opponent's claim that Theism is a poor cosmological model because there is no way to test it, is false, at least to a point. Though my opponent says there is no way to have a transcendent universe, there ARE ways to test God's transcendence. Christian's know what atheists do not. And that is that God is not a phyisical being, but a transcendent one. [1]A transcendent God follows three criteria: Self-revolution, Authoritative, and Miraculous. In order to test these three criteria, one would have to read the bible which is riddled with evidence of these three criteria.[2] In order to disprove the Bible, one would have to first disprove the existence of God and the easiest way to do that would be to disprove the Bible as truth. And again, in order to disprove anything in the bible, you would need to disprove God. You would be a dog chasing its tail. It is just pointless. My opponent talks repeatedly of God's omnicience. Is first two points on this are true: A. If God is omniscient, then he knows everything B. If He knows everything he knows his own future Everything else just falls apart from there. Ofcourse God knows everything. Ofcourse he knows his own future. It is stated plainly in the bible. Lastly I will touch on the problem of evil. This is a tough one that is hard for even some Christians to understand. Does God want to prevent evil? Yes[3] Does God know how evil came to be? Yes[4] Does God have the power to prevent evil from coming? Yes Consider 2 Peter 3:9. The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but that all come to repentance[5] My opponent also should explain, since he brought up the problem of evil, how he defines evil? Where do morals come from exactly? The atheist cannot do that. The atheist cannot explain morality simply because there is no atheistic basis for morality. [6] 1. http://carm.org... 2. http://carm.org... 3. http://www.rationalchristianity.net... 4. http://www.josh.org... 5. https://www.biblegateway.com... 6. http://carm.org...