American football is vastly superior to soccer in every conceivable way

Ok, unlike my opponent, who has admitted that there is no way to refute any of my arguments, I will crush each of his feeble assertions in the same manner that JJ Watt would crush Ronaldo if he ever dared step foot on a" gridiron. It won't take long. Then I can continue detailing the glory that is football. "" C1 and C2 (c1 c2? Where did you get that? Never mind..... ) Cardiovascular and endurance: This is a misleading claim. Most soccer players are definitely NOT in better cardio shape than football players. The game may be more start and stop, but far more intense in every play. But even if this were true, this would not make soccer superior to football in any way. I must insist that my opponent stick to the debate at hand. That football is superior to soccer in every conceivable way. It is the superior sport. Water boarding gives great cardio and" breathing stamina but that does not make it superior to football. Soccer may be a great form of torture, more effective even than waterb o arding, both for the players and the fans, but it is not a superior sport. If my opponent wishes to compare tortures, he should start his own debate. "" C3 the Olympics? Seriously? You seem to be on MY side of the debate with this one. A star football player will make millions for a decade, be very popular and famous for a lifetime. A star Olympic athlete will make a couple grand in perks for a year, than spend the rest of his or her life desperately seeking relevance in a world that has forgotten them completely before dying penniless and alone in a cardboard box in Vegas. In short, being an Olympic sport makes soccer inferior to football, not the other way around. Badminton is an Olympic sport. BADMINTON. Score one for me on this one. "" C5 Global reach. Ok, in what comparison of anything does the more common, everyday thing claim superiority? Is the penny superior to the $100.00 dollar bill? Is lead superior to gold? Why would the commonality of soccer mean anything EXCEPT that it is inferior? It is true that soccer is cheaper and easier to play than football. A mcdonalds hamburger is more global than a fine porterhouse steak. It is not superior. That proves my point: football is superior to soccer in every way. C5 Less strain on body. Right. Because sitting in a chair is superior to football for the same reason. This is just silly. Soccer is less strain on a body than football, yes, but that is because it is inferior in every conceivable way. Sex with your hand is less stressful and less likely to end in injury than sex with a partner. I do not know of anyone that would claim the former to be superior to the latter. Except perhaps Mikal....but I will let our mature and insightful audience make the decision here. On to the delights of the pinnacle of human sports on planet earth. Football. I was just scratching the surface of the abilities and demands on the players. The Quarterback position would need its very own section in a library of football, it is that deep and complicated. No position in any sport requires such a rare combination of size, speed, coordination, power, reflexes, reaction time, and intelligence. The decisions that a quarterback makes dozens of times a game would melt the brain of your average soccer player. Quarterbacks must throw a ball farther, faster and with more accuracy than any kick required in soccer. And that is just half the play! Then, it must be caught (caught!) by a man running full speed with other men trying to end his life as soon as he touches the ball. In closing, I regret that I could not go into more detail. There is a lot of great football to watch today. Happy Thanksgiving everybody! I believe that I have clearly shown the superiority of football vs soccer in every way. My opponent has failed to show any ways in which football is NOT superior.