Reincarnation is highly likely to be true

"Everything but reincarnation has been disproven including but not limit to fraud, faulty memories of informants, coincidence, genetic memories, vivid imaginations, self-delusions, ESP"lol, all of those things most certainly have NOT been disproven in dealing with cases of reincarnation because defeating them one time in one scenario doesnt void them from being the case in other cases...."A child is born with illnesses or marks and later talks about their past life of a person who died having those"Illnesses and birth marks arent things that affect only a small handful of people....."A dream that the parents had announcing the child's birth"How in the hell does that in any way tie to reincarnation?"Vivid and detailed memories that the child has of their past lives"Could easily be a coincidence. I had a dream of living through the Great Depression which im pretty sure somewhat matches the experience that MILLIONS of other people actually experienced.... That doesnt imply reincarnation. "Identification of the child with the previous personality"Theres a very finite number of personalities a person, and since there have been over 100 billion people to ever live, its feasible that literally tens of billions of people had very similar personalities. "Same personalities, physical characteristics, phobias, philias and others with the previous personality"Having blue eyes and a fear of spiders fall squarely into the 'coincidence' category, not as solid evidence of reincarnation...."Even Carl Sagan endorsed this investigation and said it might be true"Sagan only said that some of the arguments that are related to reincarnation should be investigated, he never said that it might be true. in fact he went on record saying that reincarnation is merely a 'parsimonious explanation for the stories'http://en.wikipedia.org..."There is no alternative so therefore it is probably reincarnation."Except that there is an alternative, a combination of fraud, faulty memories of informants, coincidence, genetic memories, vivid imaginations, self-delusions, and ESP that varies from case to case. "Example: in the 1930s there was a girl named Shanti Devi who at 4 years old alerted her parents that her name is Lugdi Devi and....... (2 hours later).... Everything was verified as real."Its not hard to believe that in a hell-hole country like India who's religion focuses almost entirely around reincarnation believed in the 1930's, a time when science was still in a primeval state, there was definite case of reincarnation and that was deemed to be true....... The 1930's was also the same time that 'scientists' in Nazi Germany had 'proven' that the Jews were an inferior race and that blonde hair blue eyed Germans were the 'master race'.....This case is so ancient and likely to have been biased by those investigating it that it falls drastically short of proving that reincarnation is highly likely to be true. If reincarnation were real, then the most famous case and evidence behind it wouldnt have happened a century ago at a time when a majority of people still didnt even believe in Evolution."Example two: The case of James Leininger. James always played with airplanes so they took him to an airplane museum. 2 months later he ended up having severe nightmares. He talked about being another James and in his nightmares he screamed out "Crash! Plane on fire. Little man can't get out!"........ But he researched all the facts and they were all true. There was a James who was hit and flew down who had a friend named Jack Larson etc..." This may come as a surprise to you, but there are a lot of people named Jack who flew planes in WWII against the Japanese.... Chances are there were also a lot of Dan's, Brian's, John's, Jack's, Paul's, Edward's, etc who also flew planes too, that doesnt mean that every Dan, Brian, and John who dreamed about fighting in WWII are actually reincarnated pilots.....=====================================================================================All the best cases implying that reincarnation exists either pre-dates the time when modern science even came or around, or fail to stand up to theories that the whole thing could simply be a coincidence, fraud, etc. If reincarnation were 'highly likely' to be true, then the pro's case wouldnt be almost entirely centered around a single case from the 1930's in a country whose religion happens to be entirely based off of reincarnation