Can a human truly be liberated from their ego

Thank you I appreciate you for your clarification of the definition of ego. This clarificiation makes this debate more interesting and more challenging than I originally anticipated. Now that the terms are defined, I will be arguing that a human can truly be liberated from their ego. This argument round will be divided into two parts, each part being divided into one of the two definitions of ego previously provided in Round 2. But I digress, now to officially begin my argument: Under the first definition of ego, ego is defined as: A. Psychoanalysis . the part of the psychic apparatus that experiences and reacts to the outside world and thus mediates between the primitive drives of the id and the demands of the social and physical environment. The developement psychoanayltic theory (psychoanalysis) is mainly attributed to Austrian phsycian Sigmund Frued. A primary compenet of Frued's theory is his analysis of the human psyche. The main compenet of Frued's analysis of the human psyche is the id, ego, and super-ego. (The id being defined as: "the part of the psyche, residing in the unconscious, that is the source of instinctive impulses that seek satisfaction in accordance with the pleasure principle and are modified by the ego and the superego before they are given overt expression.") (The ego being defined as: the part of the psychic apparatus that experiences and reacts to the outside world and thus mediates between the primitive drives of the id and the demands of the social and physical environment.") (The super-ego being defined as: "the part of the personality representing the conscience, formed in early life by internalization of the standards of parents and other models of behavior.") (All definitions are from dictionary.com) To simplify, the id is desire, the ego is a balance between desire and morality, or reason, and the superego is morality. In order to truly be liberated from one's ego, one would have to stop mediatating between the pure instinct of the id and the morality of the super-ego. One can do this by surrendering oneself to either their desires or their morals, ignoring a compromise between instant gratification and doing the right thing. One can also be liberated from the ego as defined by psychoanalysis by simply rejecting Fruedian's theory of the id, ego, and superego, as many have, because it cannot it can neither be proved true or refuted by scientific testing, thus Frued's theory is unscientfic, and it is therefore rational for someone to not believe the ego under the definition of Psychoanalysis. (Source: McLeod, S. A. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org... (Critical Evaluation)) Under the second definition of ego, ego is defined as: B. the "I" or self of any person; a person as thinking, feeling, and willing, and distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from objects of its thought. Self is defined as: the ego; that which knows, remembers, desires, suffers, etc., as contrasted with that known, remembered, etc. In order for a person to be truly liberated from their ego, one will have to stop distinguishing oneself from the selves of others, and from objects of its thought. It is possible for oneself to stop distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from the objects of one's thought by having an altered state of conscionoussness. An altered state of consciousness is defined as: : "any of various states of awareness (as dreaming sleep, a drug-induced hallucinogenic state, or a trance) that deviate from and are usually clearly demarcated from ordinary waking consciousness" -Merriam Webster Dictionary. There are several things a human can do to in order to attain an altered state of consciousness. These things include sleeping, sleep disorders, use of psycho-active drugs (ie alcohol, especially when becoming intoxicated with alcohol), as well as becoming psychotic. To support my argument, I will be using the definitions of sleep and unconsciousness in particular, the second definition of ego, and the definition of self. Sleep is defined as "the natural state of rest during which your eyes are closed and you become unconscious" -Merriam W. Unconsciouness is defined as: " a : not knowing or perceiving : not aware b : free from self-awareness" -Merriam Webster Ego is defined as: the "I" or self of any person; a person as thinking, feeling, and willing, and distinguishing itself from the selves of others and from objects of its thought. Self is defined as: the ego; that which knows, remembers, desires, suffers, etc., as contrasted with that known, remembered, etc. Now without further ado, here is my main argument: When a human is truly asleep, a human is truly unconscious When a human is truly unconscious, a human is truly free from self awareness When a human is truly free from self awareness, a human is truly not self aware. When a human is truly not self aware, a human is truly not disguisinged from the selves of others and from the objects of his or her own thought. When a human is truly not disguished from the selves of others and from the objects of its thought, a human truly does not have an ego. When a human does not truly have an ego, a human is truly liberated from their ego. Therefore when a human is truly asleep (or truly unconscious), a human can be truly be liberated from their ego. Thus a human can be truly liberated from their ego (by being unconscious).