god can not create life, only the dead

Pro has failed to refute any of my arguments and has not provided evidence that God cannot create life. For future rounds I ask that Pro articulate and explain his case more efficiently. While I am tired, I found his arguments quite incoherent, with no offense intended. "machine and supernature is the opposite of nature, anything that physically exist is either natural or mechanical, and supernature is false by default, imaginary" - Pro merely believes that supernature is false by default, without actually proving it. In making his argument in round one, Pro presumed that God exists by stating that God cannot do something. Pro also makes a FALSE claim that the supernatural is the opposite of nature when supernatural is: "1 of or relating to an order of existence beyond the visible observable universe; especially : of or relating to God or a god, demigod, spirit, or devil 2 a departing from what is usual or normal especially so as to appear to transcend the laws of nature b : attributed to an invisible agent (as a ghost or spirit)" (. http://www.merriam-webster.com...)The supernatural transcends nature, it is not opposite of nature. Interestingly enough, the 2nd definition of Machine is: "a living organism or one of its functional systems" (. http://www.merriam-webster.com...) (. http://dictionary.reference.com...) Contrary to Pro's claims, a Machine is not the opposite of nature, it is merely a product of nature when either created by humans or a human life itself which consists of several parts, "an apparatus consisting of interrelated parts with separate functions,used in the performance of some kind of work:" Does this definition exclude the human body? "anything that comes first is nature" - According to my argument in round one, which has yet to be refuted, God is the source of life. Also; by definition, again, the supernatural transcends the natural and you have yet to prove the supernatural doesn't exist. You merely claim it to be so. "if any knowledge exist about god, god is necessarily true, god is believed not remembered, and not sensed" - Pro fails to demonstrate how God is not sensed, I and many other Christians claim the sensing of God's presence. "hmm god cant intend randomness, as whatever god intends is specified, not random, god can only create machines" - Machines can also be a human being regardless of whatever it is you are trying to say here. My wife and I created a baby, which we intended, which isn't random, which is a human LIFE. Humans can do it, the God who created Humans cannot? "creation doesn't happen in reality" - Yet, here we are talking. .. Pro has failed to refute any points, and has actually refuted himself by ushering in my definition of Machine. Pro has also, many claims to support, let the viewer take note. Recap: Pro's initial resolution: "god can not create life because anything that is constructed or created is a machine and nature is life, my body is nature"Two definitions of Machine from two different sources that indicate that a human is a machine: "an apparatus consisting of interrelated parts with separate functions,used in the performance of some kind of work:" "a living organism or one of its functional systems" Disproving Pro by his own resolution: Where I live it is 4:00 AM and so hopefully this is clear enough for the readers:Pro's body = an apparatus consisting of interrelated parts with separate functions, used in the performance of some kind of work/a living organism or one of its functional systems = a machine = nature = life = CAN be created by GodGod can create life because anything that is constructed or created is a machine, and a machine is my body, and my body is a nature, and nature is life. Not only has Pro failed to refute my arguments, but he has refuted his own resolution.