God is immoral and evil.

and can be dismissed as trivial. All Powerful / All KnowingCon asserts I cannot say that a God can be evil, because it goes against the definition of a God.Calling Peter "Mrs. Peter" does not make him a lady and married by definition. You wouldnt say "You can't call Peter a man, it goes against the definition of Mrs." Instead you would say "Peter is a man, and unmarried, someone has given him the wrong title of Mrs."We have both agreed that we are talking about the Christian God. In the same way, christians calling their diety God does not automatically mean he is good, if we are shown numerous examples of him being bad. It simply means he may be wrongly titled, a notion I am certainly not against.We are not saying that any god could be evil, simply that the Christian "God", as spoken of in the Bible, is evil. If his evil actions don't equate with the definition of God, then the authors have either made character flaws or title flaws.Con also brings up that the God in question could not defeat iron, even though we agreed he was all powerful. This backs up my point that the "God" in question does not live up to the definition.Good and EvilThe passages in no way state God is omnibenevolant. Saying something is "perfect" or "love", is not the same as "absolutely morally right". As stated, God has lied, killed, tortured kids etc.Perfect can simply mean having all the desirable elements. Many men might think a model is "perfect", but this is in no way the same as "This model is absolutely morally right". ContradictionCon has states that I assume my own idea of evil and good is the correct one without warrant. Infact, not only is it against my own morals to kill someone, it is against my countries and many others. However, all of that would still be opinion, so lets look at it another way. The Bible puts forward its own moral code. Mass murder and geneocide are not acceptable within it, btu god commits these acts, and orders them. Over 2 million murders in the bible can be directly attributed to God. I put it forward that we cannot count the killing of 2 million, including innoscent children and babies, as morally good or perfect.I state again, God does not act in a benevolant mannar towards every person. If he does not always act in a benevolant mannar, then he is not omnibenevolant.Again, at the end of this section Con points to Gods definitions. You cannot say "God is goo dbecause he is good." Its a flawed circular argument.Definitions"Pro has not shown God is not omnibenevolent"God puts preferance on certain groups of people against others in the Bible. He aids one group of people in wards against others, he orders one group of people to mass murder the other within the bible.He cannot be benevolant towards all if he is pitching one side against the other. This shows he is not benevolant. If he is not benevolant towards all, he is not omnibenevolant.Fact or FictionIf I say "Darth Vadar was evil", this does not mean I am assuming Darth Vadar is real. I also wouldn't have to prove Darth Vadar is real to prove he is Evil, a character can have characteristics whether real, or documented in fiction, therefore cons assertion on this matter fails.I stated that God would need to be real for Cons argument for a good reason. If God is not real, there is no reason "by definition" that god must be good. He can be evil, and the author is just abit rubbish at character writing.A Truthful GodCon has not shown that God does not lie. As I meantioned there are contradictions within the bible and, in 2 Thessalonians 2:11 God makes people believe lies.The only explination for these contradictions, is if the ones about him being able to lie are true.If God can lie, whats to say that he hasn't lied about being good? I put to Con that of all what we have gone over so far points not to an omnibenevolant God, but simply to an Evil God who has commited very immoral acts, allowed very evil things to happen, created this world knowing he would do this and that these things would happen, has the power to stop them but doesn't and simply lies to justify it all. ConclusionI thank Con for the debate and his last round in advance.I have shown that the "Christian God of The Bible" does not meet the current definition of "God".I have shown reason to believe that this "God" is evil and has commited evil acts even by his own moral code.