THE OFFICIAL IZBO TRIAL; Resolved: Izbo10 should be permanently banned

Since I neglected to address the point about collusion previously, here are two definitions that show collusion does not mean what he says it does, and the voters were fucktarded for voting the way they did in that debate. Collusion is an agreement between two or more persons, sometimes illegal and therefore secretive, to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair advantage http://en.wikipedia.org... : secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose http://www.merriam-webster.com... It was an agreement to gain an unfair advantage. Strange how the bible even tells us this much. Jepthah, knew he would not win the battle without help from his god, so therefore he offered to god the first person out of his house for sacrifice and god delivered the victory, hence sealing a agreement to gain an unfair advantage. People on here might want to understand definitions before voting. The reason this site is so concerned with defining words in the beginning is not because it should be necessary, but because idiots on here don't understand definitions to begin with. That is the type of fucktardery I have put up with. Speaking of fucktardery, I have had to deal with MIG for the entire time I am on this site. This guy is nothing but a troll, since I have been here I have told people this. They disagree, but not a single one of them when asked can point out a single contribution of positive means he has made to this site. He doesn't add anything to the site but constant stupid questions, like "what is logic" and "what is truth?" and "what is our conversation about?". Yes, seriously those are the questions he has asked me. Is he fuckin stupid or just plain dumb, he might want to find his way off of this debate site and to an educator for some help if he doesn't understand what logic and truth are. I don't know what to tell him if he is stupid enough to not understand the context of the conversation he is participating in. Which leads me to I have tried the correct path on this and have reported him to Innoman many times by the report function and by private message and he has done nothing. If you legitimately have power here, you need to do something about people like Ike, man is good and grey parrot, who troll and red herring posts instead of actually talking about the topic. These types have added nothing of substance to this site. You can look straight forward at my posts, you may not agree with them, but they do have an actual point and argument. The downfall of this site is it is run by trolls who add nothing but trolling. Saturday, September 17, 2011 @ 2:24:38 AM Posted by: Profile Card innomen Do you expect us to ban someone because you don't like the quality of their posts? Neither are trolls. Saturday, September 17, 2011 @ 10:25:25 AM Posted by: Profile Card izbo10 all are trolls, show me one spot where these people have contributed anything of merited to this site in the past 2 or 3 months, beyond red herrings and useless dribble, such as infinite regress nonsense questions. Saturday, September 17, 2011 @ 10:28:37 AM Posted by: Profile Card izbo10 If i just wanted people banned because I didn't like the quality of their posts I would be asking for Reformed and Cerebral to be banned, more so reformed but these 2 at least add some arguments to the site(bad ones) but still arguments. The 3 I have mentioned are here to heckle and annoy and nothing more. Saturday, September 17, 2011 @ 11:44:52 AM Posted by: Profile Card innomen I don't think you know what a troll is. Saturday, September 17, 2011 @ 12:06:48 PM Posted by: Profile Card izbo10 a person who comes on a board to harass, with no intention of adding anything meaningful, they all meet this definition. Saturday, September 17, 2011 @ 12:15:06 PM Posted by: Profile Card innomen A troll's sole purpose is to garner attention to themselves by being annoying. Although these two individuals may do this with you, it certainly isn't their sole purpose. I've had constructive conversations with both of them. Saturday, September 17, 2011 @ 12:18:55 PM Posted by: Profile Card izbo10 All I ask is you show one constructive conversation. If you can do that I will drop my complaint, it really shouldn't be that hard if you have had them with each of them. Saturday, September 17, 2011 @ 12:24:54 PM Posted by: Profile Card innomen Well, my most recent conversation with Man is good was via PM, and i don't c/p PM's, but i will tell you it was a discussion on History and the loss of context due to a reliance on the internet versus books. It was relating to my discussion with Tarzan on the topic of the constitution and religion. With Grey Parrot, it's been a long while since I've talked to him, i used to talk to him a lot when he first came to the site. He's an interesting guy who went back to college late in life, I don't have any exact examples of a conversation with Grey just because it's been a while, but trust me on him. So, what else am I suppose to do, but take over for myself. I have been harrassed and stalked by the likes of MIG and have got no response whatsoever. He cyber stalks me to facebook. It has been reported and nothing gets done. As for his claim that there is nothing wrong with what Innoman said in the pm about debates, are we now not even sure our prosecuting attorney knows what a debate is. Lets see a debate in my own words is a situation where 2 or more sides present arguments for and against a conclusion. Strange how one could think that a debate doesnt need arguments, so in order to debate one must know how to present an argument. You, might think he was joking, but it becomes pretty damning when he asks if I want to debate something else, as that means he was serious about debating that topic. Again, I reiterate my points in this debate: 1. I have dealt with complete stupidity and fucktardery that has left me no other option then to use mockery. 2. My opponent has yet to present a case that there is even a right or wrong, the fact that a fucktard backed out of the debate does not eliminate this necessity. 3. My freedom of speech is being violated so that innoman can rid his site of anyone who seriously opposes christianity. 4. Lack of output on the site, when I was banned the debate site saw a drop in production. Look at the comments on this debate alone, it speaks to how much I draw to this site. People say I add nothing of value to this site. That is interesting, since while those same jackass' only source dictionary.com or freedictionary in their debates I am bringing top level scholarship to the table in the form of quotes from: Bart Ehrman, an author and former chair of religious studies at North Carolina University, Richard Elliot Friedman- University Professor and leading expert on Old Testament Scholarship, J.L. Mackie- a world renowned philosopher, Robert Wright a Professor of religion at 2 Ivy League Schools, Victor Stenger-a world renowned physicist. Strange how I rarely win sources, but I bring these type of sources to the table and the majority of this board brings fucktardery to the table. I have just ordered 3 new books on new testament scholarship to read and bring to the table, that is as I count it 3 more books then MIG, cerebral, and Innoman have read on religion combined. What are those 3 books: Lost Christianities by bart ehrman , Lost Gospel and Who wrote the new testament by Burton Mack. But,yet I am the uneducated one here, inspite of the books I have read.