newbies need a debate.org tutorial

I first want to address the closing argument of my opponent. "This debate is about whether we need a tutorial or not, not whether Juggle will make a tutorial or not. Con doesn't seem to get that. " I agree that the debate is on the need for a tutorial but unfortunately what Pro did was morph the debate into a different one. I have reasoning for this. Pro kept saying repeatedly that a tutorial was better because Pro was essentially not wishing to put in the work by either educating site users, or seeking out experts to debate with. Because Pro kept asserting these as his reasons for the tutorial, that was his "need" for the tutorial. But that need reflects a wish to have Juggle deal with issues on the site. That is the core wish behind that line of argument. While a tutorial has a small chance of making things better, Juggle still will not implement it. Now for the points.1. "Yeah, reading 5 to 10 debates take only 10 seconds, no sweat. " But what conceivable tutorial for this site actually can be done in 10 seconds? Also why the arbitrary number? Honestly 5 debates should not take that long to read. It also is way less taxing then trying to debate a bot.2. "My idea is the arrows show the pro/con buttons, help the newbie start a debate and shows the notifications tab. Voting won't be possible as it require verification. " I request a vote on this alone. My opponent cannot suddenly fully clarify his plan in the final round. That violates conduct because I as Con did not have adequate time to fully debate this plan with Pro because of the final round reveal. Despite that, there are still flaws with this plan. How will these arrows work spatially on the site? Why are you forcing them into a debate if they wanted to just look around when they made the profile? Who does not understand a notification tab? And honestly, I wasn't thinking they would get voting rights. What my opponent has done should lose him conduct. Also, his plan is not fully clarified/faulty and would have issues with new site users from day one of implementation.3. "Even with the tutorial or reading debates you can't attain higher logic. What the tutorial can show is that you at least take the right side for arguing, therefore making debates more efficient. And knowing the pointers for starting a debate. "Ok I have another issue. This one might be slightly hypocritical since I have zero sources this debate. But as Pro you have a burden of proof, so where are your examples of people who have taken the wrong side on a debate? Where are the links to your personal experience debates where this happened? Without those links, this point should flow to me, because we have no proof that a tutorial can actually make them pick the right side. So if a tutorial cannot do that based on the current lack of examples, then how is a tutorial better than watching a certain number of debates? It isn't is the answer.4. "This debate is about the reasons why there should have been a tutorial on this site. Who cares about Juggle? Con is deviating by using Juggle to justify his argument. "The Juggle argument was justified, and if you don't think so, that's fine. I was using Juggle to prove the point that you are debating a hypothetical tutorial that will never be implemented in reality. The reason you should lose for this is two fold. A) you have the burden of proof to justify to the voters that such a tutorial can exist. B) The reason you have to prove existence is because the resolution does not say "newbies should have a DDO tutorial" instead it says "newbies need a debate. org tutorial". The word need implies that it must exist. So obviously since you cannot prove this, you fail to uphold the resolution and should lose for it.