knowledge=(is)truth=past=destruction=memory of know

Just to clarify, I will have to show differences between the cited words in the English language; therefore, here, I shall present my argument. Definitions As definitions have not been provided, by standard DDO maxims, I shall provide definitions for all the words stated by Pro. Knowledge - facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subjectTruth - that which is in accordance with fact or realityPast - gone by in time and no longer existingDestruction - the action or process of causing so much damage to something that it no longer exists or cannot be repaired; obliterationAs "memory of know" is completely inaccurate and incomprehensible, I assume it is "memory of now." To note, now is the present, occurring time; it cannot be remembered or memorized, as if it can, it immediately becomes "then" and shifts to the past. If it is not "memory of now", I request Pro to correct me. If it is, as it is not comprehensible and inaccurate, it shall not be counted. ArgumentsTime and DestructionTime is a nonspatial continuum in which events occur in apparently irreversible succession from the past through the present to the future. [1] The second law of thermodynamics states that time is the rate of entropic graduation in the universe, i.e. it is the rate of the gradual emergence of disorder in the cosmic structure of the universe. [2] Pro's claim is that the past equates with destruction. According to most scientific theories, the eventual destruction of the universe occurs after the progress of time, i.e. entropy, which results in the constant dissemination of energy (which, according to some theories, results in cosmic expansion), graduates to cause the universe's eventual destruction. [3] With this, I conclude that the past is not destruction; destruction is heralded by the future. DefinitionsThe definitions of these words, as stated above, differ. Hence, this is an easily constructed negative case. Let me rephrase the definitions here:"Knowledge - facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subjectTruth - that which is in accordance with fact or realityPast - gone by in time and no longer existingDestruction - the action or process of causing so much damage to something that it no longer exists or cannot be repaired; obliteration."As seen above, the definitions do not equate. [All definitions from the New Oxford Dictionary of English] This constructs a valid negative case. Burden of ProofAccording to the Russell's Teapot analogy, the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making scientifically unfalsifiable yet non-supported claims. These claims are technically unfalsifiable completely and absolutely, i.e. the BoP cannot lie completely on me. Therefore, the BoP must either be shared or lie with Pro. Nonetheless, Pro should fulfill their BoP in the next round. [4]References[1] "Time." The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (Fourth ed.) (Houghton Mifflin Company). 2011.[2] Bailyn, M. (1994). A Survey of Thermodynamics, American Institute of Physics, New York, ISBN 0-88318-797-3.[3] Hawking, S. (1988). A Brief History of Time. Bantam Books. ISBN 0-553-38016-8.[4] Bury, J. B. (1914). History of Freedom and Thought. London: Williams & Norgate. p. 20.