Do Monsters exist

Thank you for your reply Slave123, I will now begin my turn. First I would like to ask what Ameen means haha. Secondly I would just like to clarify that I believe BOP should be on Slave, this is because if it were on me then I would have to prove that something does not exist, which is frankly impossible and thus abusive. That is all, I move to definitions: Definitions Slave is now being abusive. He created a debate and didn’t specify to what we would be referring and is now moving goal posts in order to make the debate impossible to win. If all Slave must prove is that “a threatening force” exists, or that “a person of unnatural or extreme ugliness” exists, then I have automatically lost this round. This is abusive, slave is obligated to define all terms before the round. I chose the common definition. If someone said “there is a monster under your bed”, they are not referring to an ugly person, nor are they referring to and ‘unnatural force’, they are most likely commenting on a mythical creature. Being that Slave123 has made an abusive round with changing goal posts, it is only reasonable to accept the common definition. He set expectations before the round that he was going to prove that an imaginary creature exists on another dimension which means he must lose the round unless our consciousness where we dream up monsters is real and on another dimension. Again, his changing of the common definition to about 6 definitions is abusive and secondly Slave has violated his duty in creating a fair definitions based debate. I maintain my definition is the correct and common one under the given circumstances. However let’s be clear, if con shows that the monsters which we imagined became real, or for some reason are real, then he can still win. Photos Slave123 has provided a plethora of fake photos which claim to show monsters, however I would like to state you have provided no evidence showing these photos are real. In order to confirm their validity, you would need quoted evidence or perhaps video of a group of real scientists confirming that it is a real picture. Or perhaps a government statement that they are real pictures of ‘monsters’. Pictures that seem real are not proof in and of themselves. You would need to show quoted or physical evidence supporting this. Sightings Slave123 has stated that because 100 people have seen mothman that he is real, that this shows how people couldn’t collaborate, however there are many differences in their stories most likely. Secondly just because people claim to see something similar doesn’t mean it is so. For instance, many more than a hundred people have claimed to see Christian angles or the Christian god yet their claim to this proves nothing. Not only this but on the other hand people of the Muslim faith have claimed to see muslim angles and thus, assuming the doctrine of each religion is correct, both cannot simultaneously be real. Because both claim to be the single god of the universe. It doesn’t even have to just be muslims and Christians though there are hundreds of thousands of religions our there which would have the same cancelling effect on one another. Interdimensional theory Slave123 has made his own theory however it is based off of false logic, he uses the appeal to ignorance fallacy in stating that just because we can’t see something and thus cannot prove it wrong, that it exists. His theory isn’t even case specific to monsters, it could just be hiding other people. Slave states I haven’t debunked his theory, well the responsibility is not mine. I have simply pointed out that you have insufficient evidence to back your theory and given that it is your job to prove it right, you have no proven anything. You need way more evidence and not just speculation. There is a reason science, unlike philosopy, happens in the lab and not the mind. Videos A.) Testimony doesn’t prove moth man B.) If you look in the comments section, it has been confirmed to just be a monkey “they did the real dna test and it was some small local monkey” Lol, still not sure if this is a troll debate or not.