Is funding of super-pacs justified in a democracy

The reason funding of super-pacs are justified in a democracy is because, pacs or super-pacs are the engine of democracies; they are inseparable. A “Super-pac” is a Political Action Committee (PAC), may engage in political spending independently of the campaigns, for example, funding media propaganda, etc. (http://en.wikipedia.org...). Democracies are an unstable form of government moving in the direction of an oligarch, the final resting place of a Super-PAC in the position of governance. The founding Fathers of the US recognized democracies are an unstable form of government, and decided to form a republic. Con would find a good overview of the US in the following YouTube video presentation: www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIdOv0A8cvE Right from the beginning the powerbrokers been challenging Constitutional limits in “baby steps,” having the side effect, intentional or not, moving away from a republic towards a democracy. The first step is the formation of Political Parties. Political Parties need money to spread the good word, and they became creative in obtaining money; hence, Super PACs. Over the last 100 years the democracy pace picked up where the Senate, once selected by the State governments, now are selected by popular vote, and the Electoral College (who elects the President) became a facade for the popular vote. The popular vote was only to elect a local representative for the House of Representatives. This way the local representative candidates did not need lots of money, or party affiliation, to campaign. This democracy movement continues today, and will eventually end in an oligarch (the final resting place of a Super-PAC ruled by committee). How is this done? By the government controlled educational system. And it is working, for example, by the mere title of this debate, implies Con has been programed to think the US is a “democracy.” One should question, why a government controlled high school or college should not have a required course in the study of the US Constitution? A Civics course that includes the Federalist Papers. Why would the US government not embrace such education for the voting citizen? When a democracy becomes a welfare state, the ones receiving money from the government (eventually the majority), will naturally vote for the ruling-class who supports more social programs, as the state becomes an oligarch, a Super-PAC onto itself, controlling the redistribution of “bread and circuses,” healthcare, Social Security, etc., by committee. And in the end, taking away most of one's freedom in a tyrannical state. The infrastructure of this oligarch is in place, and for lack of a better term, let's call it the Administration branch, which is not part of the three branches defined in US Constitution; therefore, this branch is an unconstitutional branch. The Administration branch consist of hundreds of departments (IRS, NSA, EPA, Education Department, Obamacare, etc.). This branch employs hundreds of thousands of nonelected officials writing regulations, having the same power as law, to control, monitor us, etc. Today's elected officials are enjoying government perks, too busy campaigning for reelection or for the party, representing the lobbyists, while telling the people pleasantries. Therefore, Super-PACs, or an equivalent thereof, are the engine of democracies. In other words, if one outlaws Super-PACs, something else will take its place for the powerbrokers to move an uninformed majority in a democracy in the direction of an oligarch. The solution to eliminate the Super-PAC oligarch, reinstate the US Constitution and require education on the Constitution, for today the US is in a post Constitutional era.http://www.amazon.com...