Smoking shouldn't be allowed in public places in Bulgaria again.

"I would argue further that smoking is a very hard habit to kick out, much like addictions to various stuff, like chocolate and sweets, video games, and the such. Having smoking banned does not actually do anything to solve the problem in Bulgaria, as reported by the Sofia Globe. It's not a problem, yes, but it is an irritating fact to go out into the cold to just smoke in the middle of a conversation. " It is a really bad habbit to kick out but unlikely the other addictive stuff you pointed out smoking harms people that are around smokers. The problem for me and the non-smokers is the smoke from cigarettes and banning them from closed areas will fix the problem. Also I think that breathing that horrible smoke during a conversation is worse than going out outside to for 5 minutes or less to take a smoke. It is not cold in Bulgaria anyways. "My opponent also said that "banning the smoking in those places won't be a reason to make any problems for the smoking industry. " Though I said in the first round that smoking a multi-billion dollar industry, I focused on how the tobacco industry is affecting those who work in it, in Bulgaria. There's also a link about the tobacco industry and the restaurants and bars: 85% of the patrons of most of the "public spaces" that my opponent says are smokers. Banning would ultimately deprive the affected business owners of customers, thereby losing money, both on the side of the Bulgarian tobacco industry and some parts of the hospitality industry, along with the deprivation of the "expression of public freedom" from the smokers themselves. If a typical restaurant loses 10 out of twenty crew because of low customer turnout for business, then Bulgaria would find itself with 30,000 young unemployed people. Banning smoking, as we believe to be made clear, would only lead to a detrimental effect to many aspects of the Bulgarian society. " I don't know what that link that says that 85% of the patrons are smokers. Even if they were I don't think it would affect anything. Like I said they can just go out and take a smoke it's not like they smoke every 10 minutes. I don't see how it would affect the smokers if they got out for abit. There is no reason that this law will lead to a loss of customers. If smoking gets legal again in the restaurnts then non-smokers will not go to there because they will not be satisfied with the fact that there will be smoke in the entire place. "To bring more points to the debate, having banning smoke resulted also with the Bulgarian government introducing a staggering tax hike to most cigarettes being sold in Bulgaria. I believe that this would only worsen the situation, because we believe that a tax hike could entail smuggling in Bulgaria and may bankrupt Bulgartabac, whose employees depend on the privatized company for livelihood. " Since I don't understand English quite well I didn't understand the last paragraph. It think you are trying to tell me that the government introduced a huge tax to the ciggaretes producers. I don't see a reason for Bulgartabac to bankrupt since I don't think why such a tax exists or the reason for it to exist. In conclusion to this I would like to say that the fall of this law would be worse for the non-smokers than the smokers. I am not sure about that tax. I think that you had a lot of good points. However there will always be people who are not happy with the law. If the law stays it will be bad for non-smokers, if it it doesn't it it will be worse for the smokers. But I think that it is abit worse for the non-smokers. You can try to give me some sources in the next argument.