Female athletes shouldn't be be able compete against men

My opponent starts off her debate with a flawed premise. The debate is not about "boys and girls playing sports together at a young age," it's about female athletes and whether they should compete against men at a professional level. Now with that out of the way, I'll start my rebuttal. I. Unfair Advantages of the Male Sex"In sports it is crucial that the best person wins. If a female athlete can perform better than a male athlete, this female athlete should be allowed to compete with, and beat, the male athlete. If she cannot beat a certain male athlete, so be it. If the competition is fair, she should be able to face the fact that he is more talented. It is really as simple as that."I completely agree. If the competition is fair, the athletes compete to find out who the winner is. But if the other competitor is incredibly more advantaged than the other, that is most certainly not "fair." And that's our exact dilemma; my opponent is trying to surmise that males' and females' physiological strength are the same, and that is most certainly not the case. And assuming that one of the opponents is incredibly more advantaged, especially at a physiological strength level, according to my opponent it wouldn't be fair, thus not being allowed.Men, on average, are stronger than women. This statement has nothing to do with culture, society or the patriarchy. Almost all men are stronger than almost all women. In an NHANES study, the 89% of adult men were stronger than the 89% of adult women. [1] That alone is an incredible advantage. But, it doesn't end there. Biological males have more testosterone, which fuels their competitiveness. [2] Men have naturally higher levels of anabolic steroids, which helps them recover stamina quicker. [3] Men have higher hemoglobin counts in their blood, which helps circulate oxygen better around the body. [4] Men have greater muscle mass and have denser, stronger bones, tendons, and ligaments. [5]If this is about fairness, as your whole argument is based upon, then men should not be able to compete against women. It would not be fair for a group that is incredibly (and naturally, might I add) more advantaged at the endeavor they are competing over to play with a group that is incredibly (and naturally) disadvantaged.II. Instances of Unfair Advantages at Play"I admit that this argument is easier when arguing that Michael Jordan would defeat Sheryl Swoopes in a game of street ball, but Michael Jordan is not the average man."Australia women's national Olympic soccer team lost against a team of boys under the age of 15. [6] And if that wasn't revealing enough, they lost 7-0. And this isn't a freak occurrence since this exact same thing happened a few years when America's women's national Olympic soccer team went against a team of boys under 15 and lost horribly. [7] But, all this should be no surprise since men have many, many physical advantages as I proved above. So many advantages, in fact, that a team of boys 15 years of age and under can lose to a women's national Olympic soccer team on several occasions. III. My opponent's false and malicious statementsMy opponent made numerous ad hominem fallacies:"this very debate was written in a way that denigrates women" "aside from the blatant sexism that makes up the argument""It is why the ONLY reason that women leagues exist in the first place, created either by a man to silence their complaint, or by a woman to give them their opportunity. ""men are not easily able to say they are better than all men, but through their ego they are easily able to say that they are better than all women" These statements are irrelevant to the overall argument, demonstrably false, attacks my character, and applies a false motive. I ask the voters to take this into account.1.) https://www.cdc.gov...;2.) https://www.sciencedaily.com... 3.) http://www.sportsci.org...;4.) https://www.theatlantic.com...;5.) https://www.psychologytoday.com...;6.) http://www.dailymail.co.uk...;7.) http://www.bigsoccer.com...;