Homos that rape underage girls should not face prosecution

It is indeed a pleasure to debate Brian on one of fun topics. Hope this debate was as enjoyable to him and the voters as it was to me. Here are my responses: 1) Who is liable?My opponent does not want to be held liable for the actions of his pet Homo Floro which I will name "Kanye". Since he had two rounds to name his Homo Floro and hasn't named it yet, it falls on me to name it. Now, my opponent does not want to be held liable for Kanye's actions as evidenced by his statement:"Now, if this horny Homo was brought before the courts and successfully prosecuted for rape, the family could then sue me for supplying them with a pædophile pet."My opponent also does not want Kanye to be held responsible for his own actions as my opponent feels that Kanye can't defend himself and cannot be held liable for his own actions.My opponent also agrees that there ought to responsibility for a Homo Floro's actions with this statement:"There ought to be accountability for Homos' actions, I agree, but the Homos themselves should not be held legally liable."My question then is: Who will be held liable for Kanye's actions?Not my oppoent, not Kanye and certainly not the victims. If Kanye is not prosecuted, we will have rampant rape of human girls and a new hybrid species will emerge. Note that rape will occur not due to mistaken identity but due to Homo Floros like Kanye intentionally raping human girls. To stop this, all Homo Floros must be prosecuted before a human judge.2) Homo Floros can defend themselves very well My opponent tells an interesting story about a French monkey which was accused of being a French spy and hanged. This analogy is inadequate for two reasons:(a) Homo Floros are far more intelligent than monkeys.My opponent's source says that Homo Floros are extremely intelligent. "Given that Homo floresiensis is the smallest human species ever discovered, they out-punch every known human intellectually, pound for pound"[3]. How dare my opponent compare it to a monkey??(b) The English would most certainly have hanged a human French spy.The hanging took place not because the spy was a monkey, but because he was French. So this is not an analogous situation to Kanye being prosecuted. The monkey in my opponent's example was treated like a human, so too will Kanye. 3) Mistaken Identity"You see! Even my opponent couldn't tell the difference between an adult Homo female and an adolescent human female, so what chance would a male Homo have?"I have no idea where in the world my opponent gets that from, since I never commented on his pictures. However, open these two pictures, [1] http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com...;[2] http://www.ayushveda.com... if you can tell that [1] was a Homo Floro and [2] was a human girl, I will have won this point. Even if an exceptionally stupid Homo Floro mistakes a human girl for one of its own, it must still be prosecuted as it committed a crime against a human being and violated human laws. It doesn't matter whether or not it knew that it was breaking the law. ConclusionWhen a Homo Floro rapes an underage girl, he knows that it is a human girl. He must be held accountable for his actions in a human court. Even if he doesn't know that it is a human girl, so what? Ignorance of the law is not an excuse for breaking it. Humans must still prosecute him.[3] http://news.nationalgeographic.com...