Anything is possible

I flawed the point I was trying to convey in my conclusion, allow me to present a better one.P1. Any situation is possible if it follows the laws of the universeP2. Humans use senses and thought to observe lawsP3. Human senses cannot observe everything in the universeC. It is possible there are laws humans cannot observeDefense of premise 1Possible as stated is able to happen. Something is able to happen if it happens in conjunction with the laws of the universe.Defense of premise 2The only way we know about laws is by observing their effects with our senses. i.e. Gravity. Thought is the compiling of information from senses, so it is also based off senses.Defense of premise 3This is more of a possibility. It is possible there are things we cannot observe, since this is in accordance with the laws of the universe. Keep in mind, I only need to prove possibility. One possibility can lead to another.Based on this conclusion, let's continue to a new set.P1. Any situation can be possible if it applies to a universal law humans can't observeP2. Any situation presented can follow a possible law humans cannot observeC. Any situation is possibleThe main point here is humans cannot possibly know everything with the limitation of our senses. Therefore there can be unobservable laws in which a situation could follow, and as long as the situation follows laws within the universe. A possible rebuttal to this may be " A possible situation would need to follow all laws in the universe, including ones that make it impossible." However a counter would be that there could possibly be laws that nullify other laws that make other laws inapplicable to said situation.Examples.A talking Cheeseburger.There could possibly be a planet where cheeseburgers developed vocal cords which they used to communicate. Possibly.Nothing exists.Our senses could be fabricated by nothingness that has properties that do not follow the definition of exist.I'm not writing this argument.There is possibly a law that would render my writing of this nullified and non-existent. These words could have been fabricated into your brain by an unobservable force following an unobervable law. Possibly. However not impossible. Now let me cross-examine con."There is no situation where you will self-terminate before round 3..."False, I could have possibly been so disappointed my claim was so utterly destroyed that I may have saw suicide as a way to ease my suffering. That could have happened, according to the laws of the universe. Simply because it didn't happen doesn't mean it was impossible, only unlikely. Improbable does not equal impossible.I know numbers, and you can't see nor feel them.1 <---- Oh look, I see one right thereWe know 2+2=4 simply because we can think and create mental situations. As I said, thought is a compilation of senses to make inferences and conclusions.You wouldn't know 4x5=20 if you never saw the numbers, or heard of them before. They require sense to know exist, then thought to conclude what they would multiply into.Thank you for the fun debate. I really should have made this an extra round, but I think my case holds enough ground that I won't need a rebuttal.