Santa Claus could exist

Before I begin this final argument, I would like to clarify that what I meant by the statement I made in Round 1, was that I did not mean: "Santa Claus did exist 'cause in the past Saint Nicholas used to deliver presents to all the unfortunate people in his town". Furthermore, I am not leaving my base by saying that there could be more Santas if they reproduced. They still use reindeer to travel, still travel on Christmas Eve (or 5th December, depending where you live), and probably wear the same clothes. The only difference is that there is more than one Santa, since there are now more children. Even if the original Santa is dead (notice that I am not confirming anything, merely suggesting, as my aim is to prove that the possibility that Santa Claus could exist is not 0). I also request my opponent to not write his points in verse form, please, as it can get confusing. Santa may not travel by space, I am saying that he could, to not suffer from the things the author of that (in)famous article talked about. Since my opponent also references the article, I shall continue to discuss it before I introduce the idea of quantum physics. This article assumes that there are good children in every corner of the Earth, in every single land mass on Earth; every few kilometres (or was it miles? ). Doesn't that seem ludicrous? There aren't that many people in places like Greenland, Iceland, Antarctica, etc. Therefore, Santa can skip over these areas rather quickly. He can, also, continue to accelerate here, as he doesn't have to make stops. As I said, there are 2 billion children in the World. 2 billion people UNDER 18. Does everyone under 18 believe in Santa? As I recall, "those who don't believe, don't receive", or something along those lines, right? Therefore, that number gets substantially reduced. Not to mention the fact that not every single child in the World is a good child. Again, if we say that Santa travels through space, air resistance doesn't come into the picture. Space is a vacuum. There is no weight in space; weight is caused by gravity. Santa does feel gravity, however, as I doubt he ever leaves Earth's orbit; since he is continuously falling, a similar effect is produced. The logic behind the argument that the reindeer are exposed to 14.3 quintillion J is, well, put plainly, bizarre, and questionable at best. My opponent himself says that this type of reindeer could exist. Following this logic, they are an undiscovered species by the rest of the World; therefore posing these questions: ï¿½ How can you treat land reindeer the same as flying reindeer? If they are an undiscovered species, then no one (escept Santa, obviously) knows anything about their strength, stamina, etc. ï¿½ Just because they look alike and eat the same food, doesn't mean that they are simply an "evolved" version of the land reindeer. Monkeys and chimpanzees look similar to me, but are they the same? Do they belong to the same species? Do they even belong to the same genus? ï¿½ No matter how ludicrous it seems, if these are new species, then they may be able to resist such enormous energy exposure. They are used to flying, maybe even in space, so they may also be developed to stand this much energy exposure. I shall now begin to talk about quantum physics. The terminal velocity of a reindeer in dry December air over the Northern Hemisphere is known with tremendous precision (accepting the fact that flying reindeer have exactly the same properties as land reindeer, with the sole difference being that one can fly and the other can't). The mass of Santa and his sleigh (since the number of children and their gifts is also known precisely, ahead of time, and the reindeer must weigh in minutes before the flight) is also known with tremendous precision. All of that, when taken together, means that the momentum vector of Santa and his cargo is known with incredible precision. An elementary application of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle yields the result that Santa's location, at any given moment on Christmas Eve, is highly imprecise. In other words, he is "smeared out" over the surface of the earth, analogous to the manner in which an electron is "smeared out" within a certain distance from the nucleus in an atom. Thus he can, quite literally, be everywhere at any given moment. In addition, the relativistic velocities which his reindeer can attain for brief moments make it possible for him, in certain cases, to arrive at some locations shortly before he left the North Pole. Santa, in other words, assumes for brief periods the characteristics of tachyons. So, in conclusion, why does the author of this article assume that there is at least one good child per household? Why assume that the houses are evenly distributed, and that every single area on the Earth has the same population? Why not take into account parallel processing? Why not take into account the theory that Santa can warp time? Why not make mention of the possibility that there is more than one Santa now? Who says that Santa can't do what he needs to do in a few seconds? Housewives do it all the time in the discount periods! If 10,000 vehicles with an average weight of 4,000kg cross a bridge every day, is the bridge supporting 40,000,000kg? No, it is supporting an average well below that. Thus Santa's sleigh need not support the full weight of all the presents, just as a telephone line does not support the weight of all the faxed documents transmitted. It has been demonstrated that several thousand times as much sound energy as previously possible can be produced by controlling the boundary waves at the speed of sound, avoiding shock waves and the sound barrier. So why couldn't Santa have discovered equivalent ways of taming the drag coefficients, and improving the thrust of cloven hooves a long time ago? He's had all the time in the World! And with this, I end my debate. I wish my opponent and the audience a merry Christmas and a happy New Year, and wish my opponent luck. May the best man win! SOURCES: . http://www.ijmc.com... . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://www.jardmail.co.uk... . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://en.wikipedia.org...(fiction)