jesus never stated one single, not one word about being gay nor transgender.

Verse references can be found at the bottom of this reply You said, "...I should have the right, playing by [H]is [God's] rules in reverse have every right to murder you." No you do not: we are not bound by the Old Testament Law. Even if we were, it would be a rightly deserved punishment (assuming I violated the Law), not murder. Those who broke the Law knew the repercussions of doing so; "Their bloodguiltiness [was] upon them" [1]. You said, "There---for---the---last---time---is---no---law." You also said, "...[T]hose laws are still intact..." How can laws be intact if they don't even exist? This is one of many contradictions in your response; it is somewhat hard to know what you actually believe. You then said, " You... cannot pick and choose what [you]... want... and chuck the bad stuff out." I have not chosen certain laws to follow and certain ones to ignore based on what I think; we are told what laws to follow in the New Testament. Next, you said that God "murdered people for no reason" and "hated children." God did not murder anyone for no reason, rather, He commanded that those who broke His Law be killed as punishment. The laws of the Old Testament are no longer in effect as I have stated numerous times. "...[W]e have been released from the Law, having died to that which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter" [2]. "...Christ is the end of the law" [3]. "...He... who... broke down the barrier of the dividing wall, by abolishing in His flesh the enmity, which is the Law of commandments..." [4]. "When He said, 'A new covenant,' He has made the first obsolete" [5]. These pieces of scripture prove that the Old Law is no longer in effect. You said, "[O]ne historic event [the Flood] that [never] occurred. This... proves that... [G]od... lied, and that [the] [B]ible is filled with lies." The Flood's occurrence can and has been proven, but I will not be going into that as that is not the focus of this debate. God has not lied, and you haven't provided any scriptural evidence that says otherwise. You then made a remark about my refusal to watch the 40 minutes of debate videos you linked me to. It is not that I am afraid to look at evidence that contradicts the truth, but I simply do not have the time to watch them, as I am a student who has schoolwork and chores. Next, you said that I "...flat out invent excuses." I have provided evidence to back up all of my claims. You are the one who lacks substantial proof. You said, "...[G]od gave nobody the power to change them [His laws]." This is untrue: "For not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all judgement to the Son" [6]. Jesus is God so He can do as He wishes, but this verse is even clearer, directly stating the authority God gave to Jesus. You also said, "Well [J]esus, ...not being [G]od..." Jesus is God. "His [Jesus] name will be called... Mighty God, Eternal Father, [and] Prince of Peace" [7]. "...'I, the LORD, am the maker of all things...'," and "[a]ll things came into being through Him [Jesus]..." [8, 9]. "'...He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him'" [10]. These verses are clear that Jesus is God. You, or at first I thought, said "It does no good to claim that 'Let us' is the magisterial 'we.' Such usage implies inclusivity of all authorities under a king's leadership. Invoking the Trinity solves nothing because such an idea is more contradictory than the problem it attempts to solve." After further examination I concluded that you had copied and pasted those sentences verbatim from factory.over-blog.com/article-2465573.html; you should give credit to the author when using their work, and cite it so people know where you got your information. As I stated in my previous response, God the Father; Jesus, God the Son; and the Holy Spirit make up the Godhead, also known as the Trinity. "The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit, be with you all" [11]. "For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity [Trinity] lives in bodily form" [12]. If 'Son of God' does not mean that Jesus is God, then does 'Son of Man' mean that Jesus is also not a human? Obviously not; "For this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He... was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God" [13]. How could Jesus "...[make] Himself equal with God" by calling Himself God's Son? This is because being 'the Son of God' and 'God' mean different things [14]. You then claim that Christianity "teaches the beginning of suffering." This is incorrect. Jesus suffered, taking our place, so that we could be saved. Christianity teaches that Jesus suffered for us. It does not teach people that they must suffer in order to be forgiven of sins. You then state that if you were to "...show up at [my] doorstep tomorrow and were to tell [me] that [you were my] [J]esus," I'd be forced to do everything you say. I would not believe you, because I know that when Jesus comes, "...the sun [will become] black as sackcloth made of hair, and the whole moon [will become] like blood; and the stars of the sky [will fall] to the earth... The sky [will] split apart like a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island [will be] moved out of their places" (more information about Jesus' coming can be found in Revelation) [15]. You are still insistent that Jesus sinned by breaking the Sabbath. "Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day - things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ" [16]. This proves on top of my previous evidence that we are no longer required to follow the Sabbath. You said, "The [J]ews [are] correct...," but you stated previously that there is no evidence of God's existence. How can you say that the Jew's beliefs of God are correct if you don't even believe He exists? Finally, you said, "I'm not even going to pay attention to anymore of your stupid... invented excuses." You said this because you did not want to acknowledge my correctness on your rude behavior. I said that "[y]ou said 'The hate has gotta stop people'. I agree: I have treated you with respect, while you have said that I am 'stupid', 'pathetic', a 'punk kid a$$', a 'brainwashed idiot', a 'moron', and a 'racist bigoted vile pig'. If anyone needs to stop hating, it is you." You refused to respond to your poor etiquette and continued to insult me. The video stated that the laws regarding the Sabbath are still in effect; it stated, "The grass withers, the flower fades, But the word of our God stands forever" [17]. The speaker misinterpreted the verse to mean, "God's laws stand forever." This is incorrect; it means that His promises will be unchanging, not His law. He also used the verse, "The law of the LORD is perfect, restoring the soul; The testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple" [18]. The speaker misinterpreted this verse to mean that God's law is perfect, meaning it does not need to be changed. This is also incorrect. It means that God's doctrine is perfect, in that it converts the soul (the whole verse must be taken into account). By previously proving that we are not bound by the laws of the Old Testament, the other points he made in the video are nullified, as they pertain to the Old Testament. Note: All scripture quoted from the Bible is from the New American Standard Version References: [1] Leviticus 20:13 [2] Romans 7:6 [3] Romans 10:4 [4] Ephesians 2:14, 15 [5] Hebrews 8:13 [6] John 5:22 [7] Isaiah 9:6 [8] Isaiah 44:24 [9] John 1:3 [10] John 5:23 [11] 2 Corinthians 13:14 [12] Colossians 2:9 [13] John 5:18 [14] https://carm.org... [15] Revelation 6:12-14 [16] Colossians 2:16, 17 [17] Isaiah 40:8 [18] Psalm 19:7