chsTG has epically failed as a debater

Now when looking to chsTG as an individual, or further more to his account in the ast two weeks, a consistnat pattern becomes apparent. When chsTG accepted the debate challenge on the Nov/Dec L-D topic he acted all high and mighty stating that "I had to accept this because your misunderstanding of Maslow is nausiating. To all you kids out there still using this crap as a criterion... let this be a lesson to you." (http://www.debate.org... look at the comments posted) Just analyze that one last sentence "let this be a lesson to you", almost reaching the connotation of a threat. After waiting two whole days for chsTG to post his argument for R1, he finally got online 20 minutes before the his debate expired, off course, given the consistent pattern that surrounds this particular individual, he had not the gall to post his R1 speech. Looking to his debate with theLwerd, he was also online 40 minutes before his deadline with that debate, did he post.....NOPE. Not only did he not post a round one argument, but he completely disregarded the entire sch-peel, and refused to post one debate-rap. (http://www.debate.org...) Now lets look to my third and final example before i address the supposed logical issues with an affirmative stance on the resolution. chsTG vs Orele. The first two rounds involved a quite invigorating discussion, but after that chsTG stopped posting all together, refusing to respond to any of his opponents arguments whatsoever. (http://www.debate.org...) It is interesting to note that throughout this entire event, chsTG has remained consistently active, his most recent online login being 2 days ago. Thus the only way that chsTG could possibly have failed to post even a simpleton argument is of direct will, nothing else. (http://www.debate.org...) ________________________________________________________________________________________________ My opponents justification for negating the resolution is that it is "Obviously not a failure: -The user chsTG has won two debates [1] while losing none [2]. -One of his opponents admitted "I know I lost this one."" But this simply is not true, for chsTG HAS lost one round of debate and will shortly lose another one in the future, not to mention the fact that he failed to post ann argument against me R1 thus negating the debate in its entirity, so chsTG HAS, according to the definitions provided by my opponent, "fallen short of success or achievement in something expected, attempted, desired, or approved" in great size and extent. For he will, in several days, have achieved a win-loss record of 2-2, easily of great proportions due to the fact that this is a 100% increase in debates, significantly reducing his w-l record. My opponent continues: "My opponent has asserted that forfeits constitute a failure. However, one that has not been online cannot be expected to post an argument. Therefore, the lack of an argument does not constitute a fail. Further, even if it did, such a failure would not be of epic proportions, for it was expected." Due to the fact that chsTG HAS been online during such periods of failure is can be assumed that said failures were of his direct will, and not out of negligence. Also, sine one is expected to post arguments when debating on this website, it would be expected for one to do so. Thus achieving the definition of failure, per my opponents definitions. My opponents final statement is thus: "As a debater, chsTG has clearly succeeded, having lost no debates and having won multiple. The resolution is negated." Oh contraire, chsTG has not fulfilled his duty, and his obligations as a debater by willingly failing to post arguments, not once, not twice , but four times, each debate having an expiration period of 3 days, d to the fact he was online last 2 days ago, perfectly within the realm of postability, he has deliberately failed (i can not stress this point enough). Also given that he has indeed lost one debate and soon tolose another, he has epically failed as a debater. Thank you for plodding through my rather lengthy speech,and i urge a strong Affirmative Ballot in today's debate round.