Gamers who squiz up clues on queue are cheaters!

Thank you for having metrue gamer doesn't need their hand heldFor me I am okay with anyone saying there are a true game but I would like examples so that I have something to work with. If you play Candy crush and think you are a true gamer then I find you are lacking what I think is a true gamer. A true gamer for me would be playing video games on the PC since it is the best platform to play it on. It is okay to play on console but I have more respect for people who built there own PC and who made an informed choice when buying game. Instead of going through console stores a PC gamer has Steam, GOG the Humble Bundle etc. This provides me an idea that the person is willing to take time to find a game that they prefer instead of playing the next Call of Duty. It is not wrong to play the new Call of Duty but I think you didn't think a whole when deciding to play it or not. Hand held would be for me when the game is really easy and does everything for you. Most likely the game also does not give you a consequence of dying instead of restart at the last checkpoint. Games that change that would be Dark Souls. You die you lose all your souls. Most games make it too easy to finish and give the player no sense of reward if everything is right in front of you instead of the player searching for it. Again using Call of Duty which release campaigns that are boring and not difficult until you try the hardest difficult that makes it unfair instead of challenging. bloody challengeFor me personally if I cannot work out how to complete the quest in 30 minutes then I decide to look it up. The reason is I am frustrated at what I am missing. Instead of getting more annoyed I rather have some relief in what to actually do. Sometimes it was obvious and sometimes it would take me way too long to figure out what rock I need to find in search for treasure. It depends on the player. I don't find it bad to look stuff up if I cannot figure it out myself. It is what most people do when they have a problem generally they ask for external help instead of hitting your head at a wall hoping for it to break. Spending 50 quid on a game should be reason enough not to cheat on games. For you it might be worth it to search 2 hours for treasure using a treasure but for me it is not. I paid 50 quid to enjoy the game not waste my time getting annoyed at treasure I cannot find because it wants me to find a rock. rather cheat than figure out the solutions on yer ownIf the solution takes too long to figure out then I rather cheat and get done with it and enjoy the things that I do like. if you could solve it yer selfIt is the time. I don't want to spend time annoyed about treasure that I cannot find. I rather have so that I can enjoy instead of remembering that I spent 2 hours on trying to find it. If I liked the game a lot and it does not become tedious then I would not look up answers instead I find it out myself. I just do it for games that I thought were good that ended up being boring or quests like find the treasure do not interest me in the slightest if it takes me way too long to find it. The gamer who looks up clues because they are impatient and have their knickers in a bunch or have ADHD and can't invest an extra hour to figure it out on yer own is a bloody cheater and a wally! For me it is about enjoying the parts that I liked the most instead of spending that time on something that is boring. Another hour trying to find something is too tedious and I get too impatient and tend to lose interest if it expects me to search an entire open world in search for one rock. It is Read Dead Redemption 1 the game that I was talking about. The map is huge and I would rather hunt animals or complete side quests then search for something that has the chances of finding a needle in a haystack.