The Jehovah's Witness view on death and resurrection is false.

The only problem that I can see with Pro's argumentation is that it is based on a variety of logic which cannot, I believe, be applied to organic life. For one thing it is based on suppositions and hypothetical instances which whilst not physically impossible are morally impossible, and since God is a highly moral individual that makes then absolutely impossible. To stand a chance of being an argument which meets the criteria built into the title of the proposition it has to be something that fits in with the Jehovah's Witnesses view on death and resurrection. Since everything Jehovah's witnesses believe is based on scripture, let us examine that first. Ecclesiastes 9:5,6 For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten. 6 Also, their love and their hate and their jealousy have already perished, and they have no portion anymore to time indefinite in anything that has to be done under the sun. Therefore the Jehovah's Witness view of death at least is in line with scripture and true Christian teaching. None of that is affected by Pro's argumentation How about the Jehovah's Witness view of the resurrection? God promises that al those who have not committed "sin against holy spirit" will get a resurrection with the option on eternal life, in the same sense that Adam was created with. That can only mean being resurrected into a perfect human body. Ironically nothing in the argumentation of Pro affects that either because his argumentation is based on the idea of an exact copy in all senses. Scripture does not claim that, and neither do Jehovahs Witnesses. What scripture promises is that the dead will be resurrected into these perfect bodies exactly as they were when they died. It doesn't promise that they will always remain the same, in fact it promises that they will be given the opportunity to learn and change. All it promises that at the moment of resurrection we will be "us" What we become from that point on depends, as it does now, from minute to minute, on how we react to what we encounter along the way. Since neither scripture, nor the Jehovah's Witnesses suggest more than one copy of each person, that part of Pro's argumentation is not relevant to the Proposal as worded either. What makes us, us? Simply that, as stated before, we are whatever we are at any given moment, and that changes according to experiences when we die, since we experience nothing we cannot change, and therefore on resurrection, for however long that lasts we will be exactly who and what we were at the moment, the precise moment of death. The exact moment of opening our eyes will signal a change in us whether or not we have our beliefs vindicated or completely destroyed either way that will change us, so no matter how accurate the copy God has made, we will change moment by moment. Our initial state however will still have been the "us" we were at death. Our memories will not change, they will simply be added to, though they may start to fade with the passage of sufficient time. So not only is the Jehovah's Witness view of death and resurrection correct, and possible, it is inevitable if God's purpose of having the earth populated with perfect, eternally living, human beings is ever to be realised. It is true that the scenarios presented by Pro in his argumentation are impossible but since they bear no relation to the Jehovah's Witness view of death and resurrection I can only feel that he has failed to prove his case.