To stop the usage of fossil fuel is the only way to combat global warming

" In no way can my summary of the research regarding the impact of regional climate change on the Viking civilization and Europe during the Little Ice Age be used to "prove" the current global warming is due to a natural cycle.""The Little Ice Age argument was to show that the Earth naturally and even sporadically creates its own periods of cooling which if the same thing happened today would reduce global warming. It also was to show that the Earth also naturally warms up and cools down despite the existence of humans pumping CO2 into the atmosphere through natural respiration. "A minimum in sunspots, indicates an inactive and possibly colder sun and qonsequently less energy output to warm the earth. It is not necessary that little ice age will affect our climate in the future."Little Ice ages are correspondent with decreased sunspot activity, therefore if in the future the sun DID decrease in sunspot activity then the Earth would cool. I mention that because it is expected that the sunspot activity will decrease in the near future. http://www.universetoday.com...http://articles.latimes.com...http://www.wired.co.uk...http://www.sott.net...http://tobefree.wordpress.com..."Green house effect have been keeping the earth warm from the existence of Earth"Yes and it is vital to our existence because without it temperatures worldwide would be 30 degrees colder and the ecosystem as we know it wouldnt be able to survive'but due to increase in the presence of carbon dioxide and methane. The Greenhouse effect raises the temperature far beyond the required temperature and it is completely dependent on use of fossil fuel."Temperatures dont have to be perfect for the Earth to be able to sustain itself. The range of global temperatures possible to sustain life on Earth varies by up to a dozen degrees, and recently temperatures have only risen 1 to 2 degrees despite all the CO2 being outputted for centuries. http://www2.ucar.edu...http://www.bitsofscience.org...Yet life could still go on even if temperatures rose 6 degrees. http://globalwarming.berrens.nl..." it is currently happening in the world."By 1 degree over the past 100 years and we are already taking initiatives to reduce CO2 output. "Btw according to con by reducing the use of fossil fuel we can fight global warming. But we will still be polluting the atmosphere from it's harmful pollutants. SO THE BEST WAY TO STOP GLOBAL WARMING IS TO STOP THE USAGE OF FOSSIL FUEL."1) Global warming can be stopped in a multitude of ways2) The Earth naturally removes CO2 from the atmosphere all the time, we do not have to eliminate all emissions to eliminate global warming. All we have to do is cut them enough so that nature can naturally offset the rest that is emitted and then global warming would be nullified3) We are arguing whether or not stopping all consumption of fossil fuels is the ONLY way to COMBAT global warming. NOT whether or not stopping all consumption of fossil fuels is the BEST way to ELIMINATE global Warming. "We can't deny the fact that urban smog is affecting the cities of many countries and it is caused due to fossil fuel , so the best way to stop it is the stoppage of the production of fossil fuel."Pro drops all arguments about how the use of green technology can eliminate smog from cities, meaning that we dont have to cut all consumption of fossil fuels to eliminate smog in cities. "In this long period human have not able a suitable method to stop acid rain , so , the best way is to stop the usage of fossil fuels."Yes we have, the atmosphere can absorb a good amount of Sulfur Dioxide without acid rain occurring. Emissions of SO2 only have to be limited to a critical number to prevent acid rain because those emissions diffuse in the atmosphere to the point where they arent in enough numbers to cause acid rain. Let me finish with these points, 1) The Earth can already by itself remove large amounts of CO2 and SO2 from the atmosphere2) We dont have to eliminate CO2 emissions to end global warming, we only have to limit it to a certain amount. 3) There are many other ways to combat global warming besides eliminating all consumption of fossil fuels4) Stopping the usage of all fossil fuels isnt practical and the Pro hasnt even addressed this argument5) Temperatures over the last 100 years have risen only 1 degree, and now we have green technologies to exploit6) There are ways to fight global warming, smog, and acid rain that doesnt require ending all consumption of fossil fuels