God probably exists

Sorry for the late reply.About the BOP. The BOP mainly rests on you because of the word "Probably". If I put "FSM" where "God" is, then ask you t5o disprove it, you can call me out on it. In fact, I think the lack of evidence would fit my BOP, even if it applied to me. Nonetheless, there is a relatively large portion of the BOP on you.Suppose we went on a mission to Mars, and found a domed structure in which everything was set up just right for life to exist. The temperature, for example, was set around 70o F and the humidity was at 50%; moreover, there was an oxygen recycling system, an energy gathering system, and a whole system for the production of food. Put simply, the domed structure appeared to be a fully functioning biosphere. What conclusion would we draw from finding this structure? Would we draw the conclusion that it just happened to form by chance?I'll stop you here. This is a form of the Watcher makers argument. This argument is a fallacy and I explain why in simple terms:P1: The sun gives light.P1a: A light bulb gives light.P2: Light bulbs run mainly by electricity.C: The sun runs on electricity.P1: A watch is complex; It is man made.P2: A person is complex. C: It is made by a god.You are taking traits of things and falsely putting them to other things. You then begin talking about the start of life. God is unlikely.Let's say the chance of life starting is 1 in a billion.That's a low chance, right? Sure it is. But if you have a few billion number of planets, it is likely life will arise, which it has. Take in the fact that there is billions of planets out there. (http://www.examiner.com...) These facts lend support to the idea that God is more likely. A fine-tuned universe is not nearly as likely if it was accidentally formed by the explosion of the Big Bang or such like.Why is a God needed to fine tune the universe? And really, what happens if there is only one "setting"? Again my rebuttal above can defeat this argument. Why do people donate blood if there is no benefit they are getting out of it? Why does a young man give up his seat to an old woman if he doesn't receive any benefit? Or why do people volunteer their time and money to help other people going through a famine in Haiti? Genetic kinship and reciprocal advantage doesn't come into play in every case of altruistic deeds. The more likely explanation is that a moral lawgiver (God) has given men a moral code (conscience). Would you rape people if I proved to you that god doesn't exist? This argument is baseless and an opinion. I am an atheist. But I dont rape people. I dont kill. So please tell me why I am a bad person? Even so, this doesn't prove God.A final argument that I will introduce is the idea of Hell. If religion is fallacious and a "fairytale" then that might explain Heaven- a nice place to think of to escape your problems here on earth, but that doesn't account for Hell. Why think up a place of eternal torment for people that don't accept your story? No author of any fiction book writes his story with the malevolent intention of damning you if you don't believe what he wrote. So why invent Hell if it's all fake?Scare tactics. This is not a arguemnt for God's existance. More so for an All-Loving God.