Capitolism is much better than Communism

My opponent explains Karl Marx's version of communism, and I will admit that communism seems very fair on paper. But, what my opponent doesn't realize is that the description of communism does not match the reality of communism and its effects on people and its effects on world productivity. America has survived by capitalism and has became the number 1 superpower. I will be attacking my opponent's case, and hopefully my opponent will listen, and I will do the same with her attacks. Communism is work-based- I would agree that everybody in a communist society needs to work to their own abilities, but in a capitalist society, if you work hard you can get more. The world's richest man lives in America, I haven't seen any rich person be generated out of a communist country. Also, I will say that communism looks good on paper. I really thought that the first time I read Karl Marx's Das Capital. But, in reality communism cannot do what they are saying here. Look at the examples of the countries that practiced communism. 65 million in the People's Republic of China 20 million in the Soviet Union 2 million in Cambodia 2 million in North Korea 1.7 million in Ethiopia 1.5 million in Afghanistan 1 million in the Communist states of Eastern Europe 1 million in Vietnam 150,000 in Latin America mainly Cuba 10,000 deaths "resulting from actions of the international Communist movement and Communist parties not in power. "[4] Russia, Cuba, China, and Japan all had terrible genocide. I won't blame the genocide on communism, but it still happens in communist countries. The idea that the leader is allowed to commit genocides and be able to get away with it is a horrifying idea. Whoever still sides with communism should be ashamed of themselves because it is a disgrace to your brothers and sisters that still live in these countries. Communism is fair-If you want to play the idealistic game, fine communism and socialism would have been the top ideologies. But, if you step into reality, this is never really practiced. In Russia, communism was supposed to be the fair share. Well guess what happened. The people that were in charge of the country got to have special privileges. They drove cars. They sent their children to special schools. Their children than also became in charge. And, if my opponent's model is realistic, than how come Stalin, Mao, Castro, Kosygin, Chi Minh got all the luxuries that they needed. Stalin ordered the deaths of 20 million people. Mao ordered the deaths of 65 million people. Kim Il-sung of North Korea ordered the deaths of 2 million people. Castro ordered the deaths 150,000 people. If communism is fair and people who make a positive impact on the community get wealthy, than how come these leaders are living in big houses and get anything that they want if they are so immoral? America never committed genocide like this. Communism eliminates unemployment- The fact is that communism did eliminate unemployment. But, the argument is irrelevant, because what does Japan have now thanks to capitalism. They have industries such as Sony, Nintendo, Toshiba, Capcom, and Sega. The total profits that all of these companies have made is 101 billion dollars. Communism has no central leader-My opponent admits this is idealistic communism, because it is absurd to put this model in the real world. I think that this is the heart of the problems of communism. It is extremely idealistic. You can't put this model in a realistic world. People are not going to accept this. Stalin ran his country like a dictatorship, North Korea is run like a dictatorship, Afghanistan was run like a dictatorship, and China was run like a dictatorship. My opponent's ideas are way to idealistic and cannot be accepted in the real world unlike capitalism which proved to produce 101 billion dollars with just 5 companies. Communism has high amounts of growth-Russia is an example, but it proves nothing and is irrelevant because of the amount of genocide and amount of hypocrisy that happened in Russia. If you follow my opponent's logic with communism, than that must mean that you would like to get your way by killing 20 million people, using forms of propaganda, and whenever someone revolts, they die. The harms outweigh the benefits. If you liked communist Russia so much, than why can't you just live their for a day. In America, people are free to hold communist ideals, but you can't every put communism in America because the idea is insane. No worrying about money-This is also another problem with communism. No one worries. This is an idealist dream that nobody can ever achieve. We should put my opponent's theories into reality. Did it prove results? No, it just proves that leaders can get away with shooting 65 million people. It is a disgrace to your brothers and sisters that live in those countries and whoever still supports the theory of communism should go and live in one of these countries. Capitalism is the exploitation of people- My opponent claims that capitalism is a few people that are in charge of others doing nothing. Than my opponent never got the idea of why America was built. America was built for the people that wanted to work hard for their wealth. They created the American Dream just so people could get to that dream. The founding fathers probably created one of the best versions of capitalism and still to this day you will see all of the other capitalist countries following American ideals. I mentioned self-made people such as Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. They were both once poor, but they believed in the American Dream, and now look what they built. My opponent uses the internet, but communism never could get close to building the internet. China and North Korea censor the Internet. Capitalism is why we have such a great world. Every theory has its benefits, but arguably capitalism's benefits are far too great for the harms. Look at the movies you watch, the phone you have, the clothes you have, the house you live in, the bed you sleep in. These were all created by corporations. Vote for a better reality. Vote for capitalism. If you agree with communism, than you are either not being intellectually honest or are too blind.