Replacing private cars with Aerodynes.

Sine the Pro prefers Tiltrotor VTOL's to replace cars I will argue primarily against Tiltrotor VTOL's and then apply the same concepts behind my arguments to any other aerodynes / flying machines. Reasons why cars should not be replaced by aerodynes 1) Aerodynes are expensive as hell, a single military Tilt rotor VTOL costs about $70 million to own and operate meaning that virtually nobody would be capable of owning one. This would bring transportation and commerce to a halt since now people would have no way of getting to work unless they lived there. 2) Aerodynes are very complicated to operate. Even professionals lose control of their aircraft and crash, whereas civilians even with training crash cars all the time. Aerodynes would be difficult to operate, take off, land, or park and the number of people who would die from accidents would be catastrophic. 3) Lets say somehow Aerodynes are suddenly affordable and easy to use, the problem then becomes massively congested airspace where since there are no roads or guides planes regularly have to dodge one another or they crash into them and cause chaos. The more highly populated an area would be, the more mid air crashes you would have. If you are in metropolises then the situation would be out of control. planes would be crashing and careening off of other planes and into buildings, a hundred people would die every day, damage and costs to infrastructure would be massive, nobody would get insured since there is no degree of safety at all. 4) Aerodynes cannot move goods as well as trains or even large trucks, and if aerodynes were made large enough to do so they would become a much more massive threat to other aircraft in the skies which would only increase the threat of collisions and accidents. In the cities again there would only be carnage all around because the airspace in cities is so tightly packed to begin with. 5) There are a huge number of industries made to help people buy, sell, trade, and maintain their cars. All that would be lost if suddenly cars were replaced with these bulky flying death machines 6) There is no easy way to coordinate traffic where everyone owns their own plane in a large city. You cant just rely on public transportation because public transportation only serves to bring people from business hubs to other business hubs, not to bring them to their individual jobs.... 7) How would a police car or plane pull someone over? theyd have to shoot them down or go on a 500 miles police chase.... 8) It makes it a hell of a lot easier for terrorists to attack buildings if everyone would own their own plane. 9) I already dont trust teenagers driving cars, you think everything will be dandy if they start flying million dollar war machines to high school? 10) I can already only imagine how much gas these things consume and how high it will drive gas prices.... ======================================================================================================================================================== Congestion of roads Congestion of roads is one of those problems that can be solved better by building more roads rather than do something drastic like replace cars with flying machines. Freedom (?) Roads are meant to help cars get from place to place but they also serve to protect drivers by coordinating the direction of traffic in certain directions to reduce accidents. If the world was paved in concrete so that cars were free then there would be carnage as cars ram into each other all the time. Point is roads give coordination, direction, and safety to cars whereas the sky is an open killing field.... Transition will take a long time the reason that the transfer from cars to individual flying machines is because these things are expensive, dangerous, impractical, difficult to operate compared to driving a car...