My country would be successful

I can say with confidence that Dixie would not be a successful country.LAW #1: Freedom of speech. Any person may say anything without any penalty of law. In his country it is legal to threaten to kill, murder, rape, make racial threats and sexually harass people. I addressed this issue and he said he has no problems with it. For example, t would be perfectly legal for a group of people to sexually harrass a little kid and threaten to kill him. This law encourages societal degredation, psychological problems of the people harassed, openly legal racial ithreats, and a national security issue of the president receiving legal threats to be kiled. This country would not be successful given the social unsustainability.LAW #2. No issueLAW #3.Right to defend yourself. If you feel physically threatened or someone is within your property without consent, you may kill them without risk of legal ramifications."...I never said they HAD to shoot. I simply said that they COULD shoot."Then you have missed my point entirely. Just because it doesn't HAVE to happen doesn't mean it won't. Especially when it is legal. Under your law, people may: shoot any man, woman, or child on your property if they are there without consent regardless of their intent. So if a little kid stumbled on your property to pick up his baseball, you can kill him... Wow. Many accidents would happen everyday like this if this law was legal. Throwing the country further into societal chaos and turmoil. This country is socially unstable.LAW #4. Gays. No public displays of affection between people of the same sex."My policy on this issue is designed to prevent societal erosion and keep the church, the dominate religious group in the area, happy."You are promoting discrimination. By putting one group of people down and encouraging the values of another group, you are discriminating. This sounds very familiar to the hatred before the civil rights movement in the U.S. My point stands that this would segregate and encourage discrimination in your country. Social hatred would ripple through the economy.LAW #5. No issueLAW #6. Military spending. The military must receive 35% of all revenue"To clarify, the 35% military spending would include border control, national guard, coast guard, etc. Furthermore, the fifteen extra percent would be taken out of other areas that I would cut down on, like federal assistance and other programs. Take out Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc., we will have extra money to spend."With this military, I can go to war with the Middle East if I need to, then drain the oil. I can go to war with another country and take the gold from the treasury. This can easily pay for the military, or at least part of it.The military doesn't generate any revenue, it's a government expenditure. 35% is a huge portion of GDP to allocate to the miliitary and still expect your country to be sustainable. You mention eliminating social security, medicaid, and medicare. Now, retired grandfathers, dads living in poverty, and people who desperately need medical care will not receive it because the military is getting that funding. And for what? "I can go to war with the Middle East if I need to, then drain the oil. I can go to war with another country and take the gold from the treasury. This can easily pay for the military..." Age discrimination, heartless policies, promoting a war environment, allocating a massivep portion of GDP to military-which doesn't generate revenue, international hatred of this country for going to war with the intent of slaughtering foreigners for oil. International sanctions, allied foreign countries going to war with us, and internal societal corruption have already rendered Dixie to ashes.LAW #7. Mandatory Service. All people ages 18 to 21 are required to serve in the armed forcesAlright, I will allow your argument about the mentally ill to stand...My opponent conceded this point because he did not state that the mandatory service criteria would be changed, even though I pointed out that mentally ill people would be forced to serve.LAW #8. Taxing. 23% sales tax on all goods and services."You still are ignorant about how the prebates work and how it ensures the tax burden will not be shifted to the poor"The burden of proof is on you, the one claiming your country to be successful, to explain how this taxation process works in your country. You have failed to do so, and nothing is explained. LAW #9. Immigration. All immigrants must pass a test to ensure skills in proper speech and general knowledge and competency. Tests for blood bourne illnesses will be given to all immigrants. The nation will not be permitted to accept more than .05% of its population in immigrants in a given year. Immigrants who are found to be undocumented will be sent to Puerto Rico, regardless of origin. Only natural born citizens will be permitted to go to government schools and will always be required to have first priority on jobs. They are also the only people to be employed by the government.English background biased. Immigrants treated like diseased cattle. Siphening immigrants (who are of different nationality) to 0.05%. Sending all illegals to puerto rico regardless of origin is cruel and intolerant. Blatant nationality bias in government jobs and private sector jobs. Do I even have to mention societal turmoil again?LAW #10. Imports. Only raw, unprocessed goods may be imported without taxes.Cheap goods from China make up a huge portion of our sales in discount stores such as walmart. Prices of goods in Dixie will rise significantly since imported goods will be taxed heavily. Add on the 23% tax for everything and this is devastating. More instability.LAW #11 .Religion. The national religion is protestant Christianity...The schools will be permitted to practice Christianity and cannot teach principals that go against itThere is a difference between promotion of a national religion and suppression of religion currently happening in the U.S. The problem with having a national religion is that is promotes one religion over all others. LAW #12. Again, learn about the taxing system before you criticize it...The buden of proof is yours, not mine. I'm not going to research a tax system you failed to explain.LAW #13. Government. The economy will be market. The government will be autocratic and I will be the CommanderYou clearly lack basic knowledge of government systems and economic systems. In a command economy, the government makes all the decisions in relationship to the economy. An autocratic government means that one person, me, would make all political decisions without any other house. In other words, it would be like a president with no legislature. I would not tell people where to work or what to buy, like in a command economy. But I do have the power to change a budget.You clearly stated that you would be "the Commander". Besides, you would run your country like a dictatorship. As I stated before, placing the power in the hands of one person encourages a rebeliion. Which would be inevitable given the instability of your country's laws. I already pointed this out and you failed to refute.LAW #14. United Nations. No involvement with this or any similar union."How do I not adhere to basic human rights?.."Because you don't adhere to the policies of the UN, and they maintain that human rights are not being violated. By failing to be a part of the UN, international countries will not recognize you as being a proponent of basiic human rights.LAW #15. Budget. No money may be borrowed from another country. Only money in the treasury may be spent.How have you shown that my country is not sustainable? I have refuted every argument you have given with a fair amount of reason and fact. To the contary, you have conceded and revised some of your points. The points you haven't revised or changed still face the same flaws I have pointed out and remain unchallenged. This country is not successful or sustainable