9/11 was a false flag event

The Bin Laden family (Namely the elder brother Salem) has had financial ties to the Bush family since the 1970's. Over the years the two families have made some very profitable business deals in which Osama had a hand. Osama was an accomplished engineer. Salem being a close friend to the Saudi King Fahd who ruled from 1982-2005. Saudi Arabia being an ally since WW2 has had no clear benefit to the 911 incident considering they made literal fortunes from our relationship. Saudi Arabia holds the worlds largest reserve of crude oil and also happens to be our top provider, certainly a country that has nothing to gain by damaging U.S. relations. http://www.cfr.org... http://www.mafhoum.com... http://humansarefree.com... http://www.globalresearch.ca... The FBI and VP Cheney went on record stating that there is not sufficient evidence to prove Osama or Al-qaeda had any ties to the attack. The US has been proven in having a direct hand in financing and organizing Al-qaeda, the CIA being the recruiter. The US utilized the group to combat Soviet forces entering Afghanistan so that we could engage in combat through a cover. Ultimately the endeavor was a complete success, the Soviets withdrew their forces. http://www.globalresearch.ca... https://vault.fbi.gov... The allegations of Saudi involvement was based entirely on 28 classified pages of the 911 commission report. These 28 pages were classified for 15 years. More importantly, Saudi Arabia suffered virtually no consequences for their alleged involvement but instead the US invaded Iraq. The excuse for entering Iraq was suspected weapons of mass destruction, which no proof was ever found nor provided before hand. Former President Bush made little attempt to connect Iraq to Bin Laden other than he may be taking refuge there. Suppose he was hiding in Iraq, Bush provided zero evidence to suggest Iraq had any knowledge of him being in the country. Steel melts at 2,500 degrees F http://www.onlinemetals.com... History has given us a many examples to turn to in regards to tall structures catching on fire and burning for many hours, but never once collapsing from fire. And yet we were told that 3 towers did for the first time in history all in the same day. Keep in mind they burned for far less time and were no where near being consumed as the towers were in the videos below. People were jumping out of the towers because they were being suffocated by the acrid smoke billowing out. Regardless of what was in the planes or buildings the video evidence clearly proves that the fires were not consuming the towers enough to cause a total collapse.There is there absolutely no evidence or even any reason to believe that there would be enough chemicals in not just one both all three towers to bring them down. It's absurd to suggest they had any reason to be in the building unless someone strategically placed them around each tower. That being said there is an explosive that could easily burn through steel and cause total collapse, and that is nano-thermite. This would explain the molten metal caught on video and the fused elements of concrete and steel found in the rubble (which office fires have never produced) The most important factor in the theory of controlled demolition was the admission of building 7 being "pulled" by Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the WTC buildings. The problem with what Silverstein said is that in order to collapse a building at free fall speed and into its own footprint, you would need weeks of planning. They did not have that kind of time considering how quickly the tower fell. Furthermore, firefighters are not trained to demo buildings. This means that the explosives would have to have been placed weeks in advance. No one is disputing the extreme brutality of radial Islamics around the world. What is being questioned is the claim that 19 terrorists being controlled by a man living in a cave somewhere in the middle east could organize and execute an attack as enormous as 911. This would be extremely difficult for even our own special forces to pull off. My opponents entire is based purely on speculation instead of the evidence provided on 911.