9/11 Was Not An Inside Job

Pro refuses to even argue me? what is this? Stop I say!Rest assured, I am hungry."1# Osama was furious that Saudi Arabia choose to ask to United States to help protect them from Iraq in 1991 instead of al-Qaeda."Show me the evidence for this claim.Do you know Osama personally? Did he tell you that?What qualifies as furious? A tad bit upset and jealous, or truly fly plane into building rage?If so, Osama could have meditated or went to some conciling. Plus, I'm finding it hard to believe he could get that angry."2# They hated us because we supported Israel."Us, when did I become involved with Al-Qada? Who is "we"?Could you please be more specific and descriptive? You know I don't know what your talking about, at least act like you care."3# They believe that whoever is not Muslim is evil, and they view the U.S as a Christian state"Evidence...Come on, spite it out."4# They felt abandoned that we just left them after the soviet invasion of 1979-1989" Okay, what are you doing here? You are giving reasons why the Al-quesdilla's attacked "us" but not actually addressing the issue at hand."Instead of blaming the government, blame the jerks who actually blew up the WTC and the pentagon and killed 3,000 people"Are you calling me a liar?I'm not blaming the government for WHAT they failed to prevent, I'm just pointing out that they FAILED to prevent something that they had the power and resources to prevent.I'm pretty sure that the CIA, FBI, and NSA each had separate information. That, linked together, could indicate what Bin Laden was planning. Why didn't they just link them? Laziness perhaps... Laziness too quick for Amercia..."Your argument seems unorganized and with very little debatable subjects."...Is that my problem? Counter the rebuttals if you have to, don't blame for my non-argument.That is absolutely ridiculous.I have bigger fish to fry brotha, and if you aren't satisfied with my food then just leave it be.Argument:I still feel 9/11 was an inside job.The proof of the pudding's in the eating...Yeah, I said that...Is that debateable? Yes it's not.The problem with it not being an inside job is the fact the plane Al-Qaeda used was american, IN AMERICA!How could they be within the premises in the first place? They had to get in the plane and everything with some assistence!In my last argument you failed to rebuke, I showed 9/11, even by definition, was an inside job.Think about this:The government FAILS to prevent 9/11. They fail to prevent both the actual date from coming and fail to prevent the hijacks!9/11 hijacks happened!There is a lot of evidence to suggest that 9/11 was an inside job.Quoting a famous philsopher and scholar:"It was not done for oil. That is a strawman arguement. It was done to consolidate power and advance the agenda of the neocon federalists- Cheney, Rumsfeld and Jean Kirkpatrick. They wanted to institute a concept known as the "Unitary Executive". Under this definition the president would have sweeping powers. Congress would lose the authority of oversight. From 2004 to 2006 that is precisely what was attempted by the Bush administration. That was the motivation for the inside job of 911. That and reelection. No sitting US president has ever failed reelection. A fact not lost on Carl Rove."DCH, you are forever in our hearts.9/11 (using my definition, not the date) was so an inside job, you can look into records, the event, where it took place, and even the people and just say, "Inside job."In my very first round I carefully put out my argument, fully perpared with definitions of what I was talking about and 1 argument. Pro, since they have not said a thing, implies no objection to what I have put on the table.You can look at my first round, read everything, and see that 9/11 was an inside job.Pro, so far, is unable show the proof is not in the pudding.How does pro counter this?How does pro explain that 9/11 is an outside job/non-inside job, when it was obviously an inside one?Makes no sense...When the blind lead the blind... get out of the way.I rest my case!Vote for me!!!! ~Please... ^_^