A New Way

Firstly do you like agriculture? It is an amazing industry designed to keep up with the demands of population, isn't it crazy that as you say over population, which I am assuming is your way of saying the increase of population is a "myth" that the agriculture business continues to be one of the fastest growing forms of industry www.ers.usda.gov/media/201254/eb9_1_.pdf simple fact more are born than die what does that leave us with? also I'm assuming china is a myth? As for your second point what I mean by "nobody hurt or killed and we taught our children the way they are designed to be taught not as those before us have taught theirs" is that the rigidity and curriculum standards hold several students back preventing them to truly get involved in the education. No, I am not religious I believe in evolution which "designed" our brain for advanced pattern recognition an the retention of information to directly correlate with the pleasure involved with said information I like to call it fun. such as taking kids outside for biology an explaining it more thoroughly and purposefully since I'm sure you'll ask what I mean by purposefully, an explanation of the value of the information and the purpose of the knowledge This next part upset me a little you are smarter than this to know with our level of intelligence that there would be implements of defending ourselves as if we were going to devolve at the attempt at a more peace prone species to a place of pacify that makes us vulnerable to attack from the more than likely small number of convincing psychopaths now let me explain a little deeper every state has an elected council this councils job is not to provide an answer but a question to the people and a way to tally these votes so the people have control of themselves its not a cult diagram or a power agenda it is simply the pursuit not of perfection but science space and understanding of the world around us this Government wont have any say in matters of the home it would be that parents desicion how to raise their child this is only an additional option of a greater education now if there where matters to be dealt with on the policing end such as harm to others then a militia would attempt a peaceful apprehension so evidence could be examined an another vote could take place " If we designed a web like politic system with no super power,"By this I suppose you mean no leader. However, when you say "we designed" someone has to design this. Wouldn't they be a leader? And how would a government function without a leader? Would the people always be telling the government what to do on every single issue? People would have to spend all of their time that way. No that would make that person the designer of a political system, a leader leads they don't design ask obama with obamacare. Have you ever heard of jury duty it would be alot like that for the policing issues with larger juries and for the voting for new elected council members its not like it would be an every day thing."the power that would protect us would come from unity we could find land, be self sufficient"Apparently, we would be self sufficient by relying on others to protect us. This, in itself, is a contradiction. Also, this is the 21st century. Why do we need to "find land"? Are we explorers? Pioneers?Again, your smarter than this I am referring to self as the country as an entity you see because this way no one goes without because of circumstance there is always help so yes, self sufficient. Now now... you know what your right I'm sure America would be totally on bored or maybe Russia lets just ask them to repent all their history an change all their systems for us a new country like this isn't going to invade someone I mean comon did you think we would just swim around international waters self sufficiently. we have to find somewhere uninhabited with resources or we start off with war wrong direction don't you thinkI will ignore the fact that you refereed to my ideas as a commune as anyone with a mind an a few books knows a fallacy of logic when they see one"Our collective intelligence is the key to true evolution as a people, if only we would set aside prides and use our passion an tenacity for a more efficient, righteous cause, to find truth an to preserve our wonderful future with all the possibilities in the fabric in time waiting for us to decide what we want."Suppose that for some reason, you do know "the key to true evolution as a people", why would a new system of government be needed? People's collective intelligence is being used right now, as the world's best researchers and universities are sharing and gathering information. Also, who is to say that everyone working together (apparently with no leader, and therefor no order) is going to be more efficient than our current system? Competition is good. It drives us to do better than others, and so we achieve higher feats.No on this one your right there are no technologies being held down by big businesses and the segregation of knowledge with wealth doesn't exist its not like poor people have to work more denying them education and the rich can spend all there money so the professors from those universities would teach their rich children perpetuating the cycle- facetious sarcasm and competion can be amazing for growth lion cubs use it while playing to reinforce their instincts and prepare for their lives but you know who didn't have any competition Albert Einstein he grew up with nothing more than a few books his father had given him an the idea of magnetism with a pocket compass it wasn't until he was full grown and had developed the theory of relativity that he was even around people with minds like his so yes competition is good as a plaything but real breakthroughs and genius don't need competition to happen In summary, if people don't cooperate I'm assuming you mean the majority well I have faith in them if they don't think its right it probably isn't criminal acts will be handled civilly where our laws come from the best of all other countries visions if it becomes corrupt the people will revolt it would be law that council men are aloud no security I believe I rudely answered the question of land in the manner you rudely presented it I understand perfect is not real who wants perfect with nothing left to aim for we would have no point but I believe our point is to be the best we can be an I believe that the majority agrees Forgive my grammar and punctuation I typed this rather quickly and honestly I don't care its legible are we here to debate or work on our English assignments