Evolution is Unsound

Now let's get down to work shall we? Evolution, we all have an idea on what this word means. Charles Darwin, a very prominent man in the field of evolution. I am here to tell you how Charles Darwin and other evolutionists are wrong. There are many different areas of evolution to cover which would gobble my 40,000 characters like mamas apple pie at Easter so we will discuss one or two areas each round. Starting with the eye and other highly complex systems in the body. Can a simple mousetrap disprove evolution? A mousetrap is irreducibly complex which means a single system that is made up of several well matched interacting pieces that contribute to a basic function where if one part is removed it fail to operate. This can be used to combat Darwins theory of natural selection and Survival of the fittest theory. A mousetrap cannot operate without all five pieces that is the platform, spring, holding bar, hammer and the catch. If just one part is not there, the mousetrap fails to operate. So how can an organism start? If all pieces much be there for it to be fit and survive. There are vital functions in living creatures that require all the parts and if derived even one part the organism will die. We will examine 4 of these irreducibly complex organisms. First the cilia. Cilia These are microscopic hairlike structures on the surface of some cells. Some single cell organisms move using one or more cilia. Ciliated cells line our lungs pushing debris and mucous up to the throat where the mucous is then swallowed. The male sperm has one long cilium that it uses to move around. Cilia are tiny however they are not simple. They require a motor (Dynein), Gasoline (ATP), Microtubules, and Nexin fibers. . http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu... All of these parts are required for the process of ciliary motion. Just like a mousetrap it cannot have evolved because without one little part it dies. The same is so for the Flagellum. Just as complex. However it moves via a propeller motion while the cilia move like oars. Which brings the question why would evolution create two if one less complex does the job the same way? The Eye Complicated stuff in this department. "In order for vision to occur, light first passes through the cornea, then through the aqueous humor. The light then passes through the opening in the iris called the pupil, goes through the transparent lens (which is held in place by the ciliary muscle), passes through the vitreous humor (a gel-like material), and finally reaches the retina at the rear of the eyeball. The retina is made up of layers of nerve cells, rod and cone cells, and pigment cells. When light hits the rod and cone cells of the retina, they send impulses to the nerve cells. These nerve cells organize some introductory information about the image and relay impulses received from the rod and cone cells to the back of the brain (the occipital lobes) where the visual cortex is located. When the image reaches the retina from the lens, it is flipped horizontally and is upside down from how it is in real life. The visual cortex somehow uses its nerve cells to contact other nerve cells in the brain that are in close proximity to correct the image"s orientation so that the mental image is displayed as it appears in real life, which completes the vision process. " . https://sunandshield.wordpress.com... If just one thing is missing it won't work. If you read the site it will explain more in depth I just don't have the characters or time to write it all in my own words. Bombardier Beetle, Giraffe and other evolution defying creatures First the bombardier beetle. It defends itself by mixing together two very dangerous chemicals. Hydroquinone and hydrogen peroxide which react to create a lot of heat that deters most predators. According to evolutionists the defense mechanism has evolved through small steps adding one feature at a time. . http://www.ichthus.info... This however is impossible as the site shows because the chemical would kill the beetle and there would be no more bombardier beetle. The site uses some humor but I believe the point gets across. As for the giraffe it is another case of irreducible complexity and it disproves darwins theory of survival of the fittest. . http://creation.com... A giraffe needs quite the system in order to get blood to it's head and this article describes it in depth. . http://www.cuttingedge.org... these sites describe other animals that defy evolutionists. Blood clotting Another complex process that cannot be reduced or else we would bleed to death at the smallest cut. . http://creation.com... Many different processes that cannot be reduced. Are involved in blood clotting. How can such things evolve? They can't is the answer. Next I am going to talk about big bang, origins of man and a blind watchmaker. Again I thank my opponent for accepting me and I hope this will be a lively debate. Because as I have noticed most debates regarding evolution have not been completed. Another thing, I don't want my opponent to come out saying "Well if not evolution then what? " that's a different topic and all I am saying is evolution is unsound. I am not going to state what I support however evolution is not it. Anyways I look forward to my opponents response.