Atheism is a Lie

Thank you Chipmunk for giving me this opportunity. Although, Apparently it would seem that I agree with you, and perhaps if you re-evaluate the way that you presented the argument I do in fact agree with you, I am going to take this debate as a challenge for you. Because this is a logical debate, I present my first case, my acceptance in this manner: "Philanthropy A Word everyone can Use. Philanthropy: is the study or practice of improving human behaviour. Philanthropist(s): help make people be well. Philosophy: is the study of thought(s) and how a person thinks. Philosopher(s): know how to explain emotions, ideas and desires, and the/their causes. Then, what am I thinking? You are: interested in what I might be able to do; are wondering if I actually might know what you are thinking; [you] think/thought that you have/had no use for me or my skills; and think that I am funny because this is my expertise. But, you are also interested in what else I might be useful for, which|that might make you decide not to abolish me. Then what do you do? I motivate people to be productive, healthy, smart|intelligent and wise. By doing what (exactly)? Planting crops, writing, participating in sports, listening to people"s political and/or personal problems, teaching science(s). Simple things, which|that make life rich/interesting. Modest: Not being conceited. Not prioritizing on one"s own desires. Not being presumptuious. Humble : Not interjecting or disregarding other"s statments. Tolerating but not indulging in other"s loftyness or arrogance. Modesty You are humble, but you have humility. Humble is an adjective. Humility is a noun, but is more accurately described as an adverb. It is humilitaing to listen to patronizing or pretending people. Humility A Humble person is an unpretending person ~ they are not delusional. A Modest person may be delusional or unpretending, but they are not offensively intrusive. ... To present a delsuional opinion, conclusion or idea as a fact or soemthing of graveness is what it means to not be modest or humble. A delusional opinion can be determined by the means it was aquired or "established". Because the delusion is always rendered by an individual whom is not ignorant of their conduct, they can be determeined to not be humble or modest, even if they appear formal or polite. " That state, can be judged by evaluating the content of their delusion and determining that they have had no substance for genuine faith. This is the art of Philanthropy: Improving human nature through evaluation of physcology (which is the sciencce of Philosophy). Antinoms of Humility and Modesty. Arrogance: a pretending, assuming, over exerting, incoherent, pompous or conceited act of behaviour, geared towards influencing conclusions or results. Insolence: The act of being arrogant with an air of jubalie. Impudence: the act of arrogance where one is incapable (due to lack of knowledge or capacity to aquire knowledge) of truthfully making assertions. & Altruistic Altruistically can be found to be defined as: "unselfishly concerned for or devoted to the welfare of others (oposed to egotistical). Also defined as an animal trait relating to the behaviour of: risking or directly placing one"s self at a disadvantage for the benefit of other"s (specifically of it"s own kind in the animal kingdom (ie. Bees or ants, parents or herds.). Where as an act intended to be out of Richteousness can be foolish, presumptuous or ill conducted, altruistic "behaviour" is simply a mentality, what is not reflected in the behaviour that manifests. An example of what is and what is not philanthropy: If the results of the effort are more valuable t the worker than the wage, it may be an act of philanthropy. If the wages exceed the results of the work in priority, it is not an act of philanthropy. Philanthropy can be a form of education, or "charity" in the sence that you are providing the tools nessisssary to think, rationalize or come to true conclusions, communicate ethically and produce knowledge. In each case (every instance of philanthropy) you further develop understanding and apply wisdom {Study and practice*}. ). Charity is not always philanthropy; if it is not an act of improving the state of being, and not only improving the current affairs. It is most readily defined as Charity. I choose to be a philanthropist not out of richteousness or even self-richteousness, but out of fear. I regret the plausible outcome of affliction on humanity should we overlook it"s deterioration. I do not study or apply philanthropy for my own good, I simply do it, with complete disregard for the afflictions which may ensue, to do it for the immediate reward of enlightenment [ & expect the recipient to flourish as "God" intended {in their own way(but with measurable guidance[ei. Do not use the Lord"s name in vain])}]. This is the Story of my life." through this evaluation of conduct I will have you deduct that, "Agnosism is a lack of faith in God. Although it is faith in "a" 'God', it is lack of Faith in THE God. Therefor it is atheism." People clearly can and do lack faith in God. BUT you did not make it clear that ATHEISM is a belief in God not being real as a convincing argument to contend - that (God not existing) would be a bold-faced lie indeed.