AMD is a better choice for home PC's and laptops than intel

Thank you. Now let's discuss hardware.AMD has the factor needed.I agree that AMD has a good deal of factors, and is in fact a suitable product line... But not for every Home Computer...AMD works great for games and music... But not everyone goes for that. My mother, for example, looks for a good work computer. Now don't get confused by that... It's not a computer for at work, it's a home computer used for non-game related things. It doesn't have to be related to work either. She just needs something to write papers, and do research, and basically keep her life organised.Not everyone is looking for Gaming PCs. This means AMD is mostly good for Gaming Computers, but not all Home PC as a whole.Intel is too costly.Yes, but for a reason... The companies do not price the same for each GHz, but an Intel GHz is not the same as an AMD GHz.Your argument is comparing processors using the same units... Those units of measurement are actually different. You see, it works like moving a bucket of water... They need to fill up a 120 gallon lake. One is using 5 buckets that hold 2 gallons each, and the other is using 7 buckets that hold 1. It'll take the first one less trips, but he's working harder each trip.AMD and Intel work the same way. At 2.5 GHz, they are moving the same amount of information, but one is moving more at a slower speed, while the other one is moving less at a faster speed. This gives us different end results and differences in performance.AMD is the one that moves a lot more at once. This means it can handle data-heavy games. It mores slower through. That's okay, because both processors meet the game's speed requirements... But AMD meets the game's workload requirement.Intel, however, works a faster workload. This doesn't mean it can't handle games. It can handle them well, but ultimately the Data piles up on the games side because not enough is being moved per cycle. That's okay, because Intel isn't as much for games... You see, when on the Internet, Intel is better because it can handle the quicker speed internet. The internet is moving so fast, that the slower AMD processor can't get it moved in time (trust me, I know. I have one...) This is because the Internet must be constinuously downloaded, a speed-heavy way to move data from one computer to another across the country.So what is Intel best at?Intel can process the quicker speeds (again remembering, Video Games don't actually need quicker speed, as both are fast enough, it just needs larger piles of data moved.) You see, if AMD can carry four 2 gallon buckets every 6 seconds, and Intel can carry four 1 gallon buckets every 3 seconds, and the internet piles 5 gallons of information every 3 seconds, it goes like this...AMD fills up 5 out of 8 gallons worth (leaving 0 gallons left over), and leaves. It comes back in 6 seconds to 10 gallons of information (10 gallons every 6 seconds + 0 left over). Next delivery, and it's returning to 12 gallons. It starts running behind.Intel fills up 4 out of 4 gallons worth (leaving 1 gallon left over), and leaves. It comes back in 2 seconds to only 4.5 gallons of information (3.5 gallons every 2 seconds + 1 gallon left over). Next delivery, and it's returning to 4 gallons of information. It's running on track.Video Games don't require as much speed for one reason... It's not downloading all of it's new information. The information's already there, it just needs moving. Internet has to download all new data to Temporary Memory continuously, which is why they recommend downloading cookies.Many need Intel for internet speed and other things that require more speed than workload.. a) http://www.geek.com...Both can reach up to the same amount of work, but only under different cicumstances.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I conclude that AMD is great for Gaming PCs, but not for every home PC. It depends on what the computer's is used for, and whether it'll need speed or workload to operate best.