Vaccine Disbursement

Rebuttal: As I already stated, the countries that ARE NOT involved will not be infringed upon. I never said a single thing about the countries who ARE involved and under the rules set by Gavi. We are only setting up a program that countries MAY decide to follow IF they so chose to do so. What another country chooses to do is not under any circumstances our issue, all we stand to do is provide them with an option. If they decide to engage in our program that is their decision, and they are making the choice to over step the boundries of free market in their country, not us. Therefore, Gavi is not in any way "communist" as you so put it. We simply make the rules of our program, anyone oppossed does not have to join us, and in return will not benefit from our program. As for the comparisson of the rich man to poor man, I was using it as a real world example to back up the disbursment plan which does make it relivant. The poorer you are the more likely you are to catch an infectious disease, therefore the highest bidder (most likely a richer man), has a lower risk of catching a disease. It is common sence. Why would we give the immunisations to the higher bidder if they are already less likely to catch an illness? It is really not that hard to understand. Also, I believe that in your direct quote from gavialliance.org it says "foreign charitable organisations", if people are using their money and investing it into a charitable oragnisation they should know they aren't going to get anything back from it. Thats how charity works, you do it out of the kindness of your heart, or because you have an interest in the topic at hand. If money for the Gavi program is coming from their pockets its their choice. As far as I know chairies can't force people to participate in their organisations. Therefore, anyone under the program or involved has equal as much right to vaccines as someone who is not, but only the member will recieve them at a lower price, etc. Gavi is not making the right to imunisations higher for members, they are only helping members reach a peak production and offer medicine at a lower price. Also, the people giving money to the chairty aren't provding the vaccines. They are providing us (Gavi) with money to pay our suppliers, who in hand provide countries involved in Gavi with vaccines. If the rich people have a problem with the way the program works they can surely stop doating money to the non profitable charitable organisation set up for the Disbursment plan. Round 3 Points: According to an article found on vaccines.gov, immunizations are critical and can save your life, as well as other peoples life's and are very effective, but It is a good idea to also enforce the Gavi disbursement plan because, according to gavialliance, the Gavi disbursement plan will only increase these benefits. Vaccine distribution already saves a lot of people from sickness, but think about the increase in how many people would benefit from Gavi and stay healthy. The program, as already stated, increases production and availability, therefore, the program will also increase the resistance to particular diseases and save a larger number of people from dying as a result of an illness. The more vaccines people receive the more resistant to diseases they are, the more illness resistant people there are, the more lives we can save. It is a chain reaction. That is how illness transfer is stopped, and the less illness transfer there is the less illness there will be altogether. The regulation of vaccines, aka Gavi, will ensure that traveling illnesses be significantly decreased, according to Gavialliance. By using the disbursement plan to regulate what vaccines go to who/where we can preserve our lives and protect ourselves from mass outbreak of disease.