Deathbattles suck and is overrated

Once again, thank you for your arguments.Pro is still hung up on the fact that I took him literally in his opening argument. 1. "You should have known what I meant when I said dare me to tell otherwise, if I wanted you to take that literally I would have only put 1 round" Just because you make an argument one round does not mean that you want someone to take you literally! That doesn't make sense at all! I am a very literal person, and I precieve things the way that I see and hear them. I don't try to uncover hidden meanings of arguments and such, I just look at the facts! You cannot blame this on me, because it is my personality, and I do not have to change it based on my opponents personality. Thats just plain silly. If you don't want someone to mis-precieve what you say, I encourage you to take more time to structure your arguments.2. Pro skips right over my second point, suggesting that he does not have any proof that it is my fault that I took a literal interpretation of what he said. I have won this part of the argument do to his lack of further arguments.3. "Pro's basis for his unliking of the death battles on screw attack." Pro furthermore suggests that the animation is only good when its in 3D or remastered 2D. He then suggests that a fighting scene between 2D characters is better than their animation. But wait, you just contradicted yourself. Pro says that he thinks the animation is good, but only when it is in 2D or 3D, but then says that a simple 2D animation is better than theirs. Basically, he says that the animation is good, but other animation that is just like it-- is better. This is contradiction from the standpoint that he does not like their animation, and he believes that it is bad-- but then says that it really is good!, just not all of the time. He also suggests that I do not consider his other reasons, but in truth, I did. 1. (His point)" It cant be used to predict the outcome of a battle IS A DEFINATE FACT weather you like it or not" (My argument)"Another point you make is that it is hard to predict what would happen in a real battle. Well.... thats what they are trying to do. They are putting the characters into a fight together, and attempting to fictionalize what could happen if they fought each other. It is your opinion wether they are accurate or not, it is not a fact. "2. I did not include his point about giving DBZ fanbase a bad name, because he failed to provide a link to his proof, rather than just a suggestion that the fanbase was given a bad name. What is DBZ? What did the death battles do to give it a bad name? Pro does not explain or prove anyhting pertaining to "DBZ". 3. (His point):OUT COMES are inaccurate, most of those characters wnt go bloodlust at all, anything can happen, seriously people program fictional characters like their computers. : (My argument)"Another point you make is that it is hard to predict what would happen in a real battle. Well.... thats what they are trying to do. They are putting the characters into a fight together, and attempting to fictionalize what could happen if they fought each other. It is your opinion wether they are accurate or not, it is not a fact. "One final rebuttal4. "Whats wrong with having some opinions in debates?" Well, you see... nothing.Debate: a formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward. As long as your argument is well constructed you're fine. When your whole argument seems to be based on opinion, and no fact, who's to say that you haven't taken things out of context and twisted them into your opinion? I'm not suggesting that this is what you did, but it is not a legitimate reason to say that an animated battle is not reliable because you do not like their animation style and skills. That was the point I was trying to make.Vote Con! :) You know you want to..