Is it possible to romantically love more than one person at a time

1.) You've missed what I've been trying to point out completely. I understand the definition of platonic love, and I know that platonic love and romantic love are two different things, but that's the point. They are two completely different things. If platonic love is self-expression in an emotional and spiritual way amongst friends yet romantic love is technically the same thing in this case then how are you completely sure that a person is not just platonically loving more than one person rather than romantically loving them all? Either way, regardless whether the definitions in this case are the same or not, it does not properly support your argument on how romantically loving more than one person is possible. 4.) You're not making sense in this argument at all. You also missed my point. People change, you have also stated and agreed to that, but just because one person in the relationship changes, does not also mean that the other person will change as well. Lots of people change, you're absolutely correct but not everyone can change the same way at the same time. Your first sentence also doesn't match with your whole statement in this paragraph. Just because some people practice monogamy and others practice polygamy doesn't support your argument on how people change or how romantically loving more than one person is possible. 5.) That's actually the opposite. Because polygamy is more than two people, the risk of cheating is increased because of the fact that there is more people involved. Just because the risk of cheating exists in monogamous relationship doesn't necessarily mean that it's more of a fear in it. 6.) Can you please explain why polygamous relationship doesn't have a higher consequence of getting tired or cheating because it doesn't support the argument. 7.) That's wrong, you stated in the previous round that loving more than one person means to spread love to as many people as possible. Therefore, would make it seem that finding a lot of people is the goal. Also, I didn't associate a crush with infatuation. As mentioned in our agreed definition, infatuation is derived from obsessive and fanatic thoughts which is not the same thing as a crush. A crush is just a bit of interest of possibly loving a new person romantically, which in my case makes sense if I'm explaining how having crushes on a bunch of people isn't what romantic love is. Actually, in this case, love can be a controllable thing since people choose to be in a monogamous and polygamous relationship. It can also be controllable when it comes to choosing who to love, the thing that is actually uncontrollable is crushes. Maybe having crushes on multiple people is a possible thing but loving more than one person is not possible. 8.) You don't have enough reasons to support this argument. You can't just say it's possible without explaining why it is. Intimacy is essential in a relationship but it doesn't necessarily mean that it's able to happen in a polygamous relationship. 9.) This statement makes absolutely no sense so I choose not to retaliate against it. 10.) Feelings are uncontainable yes, but there is such thing as self-control. There's also such thing as morals. Just because people develop feelings (crushes) on a bunch of people doesn't mean the person has to act upon every single feeling for every single person. Polygamous relationships are morally wrong and just because feelings are uncontrollable doesn't mean we have to comply with them. It also doesn't support your point on how romantically loving more than one person is possible.