911 WAS an inside job ..........

-There is no argument over the melting point of lead, it simply was in the same quote as the iron melting.HoweverThe RJ Lee report notes “extremely high temperatures during the collapse which caused metallic lead to volatilize, oxidize, and finally condense on the surface of the mineral wool [1].” Again, “metals were vaporized at the WTC during the WTC Event and either deposited on WTC Dust or deposited directly onto surfaces in the Building [1].” Where do the requisite high temperatures come from?An additional characteristic of WTC Dust is the presence of coated particles and fibers. The coatings vary in thickness from monolayers to finely-dispersed sub-micron sized particles. The coated particles have been detected by low voltage back-scattered electron imaging, x-ray microprobe analysis, and high resolution x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) as illustrated as an example in figure 3 and figure 4. Figure 3 shows traces of lead compounds identified on the surfaces of mineral wool by XPS, and the analysis of x-ray photoelectron spectra led to the identification of two peaks containing either lead oxide or lead sulfate (figure 4). The presence of lead oxide on the surface of mineral wool indicates the existence of extremely high temperatures during the collapse which caused metallic lead to volatilize, oxidize, and finally condense on the surface of the mineral wool [1].The temperature required to volatilize/boil lead is 1,740 C or 3,164 F [8]. No explanation for the origin of the indicated “extremely high temperatures during the collapse” is offered in the RJ Lee report.'Particles have melting points far lower than that of large blocks of material, often by hundreds of degrees. This is a well-known phenomenon.[3]'The argument over what produced the iron spheres comes down to analysis using spectroscopy techniques to find the chemical composition of iron spheres. The Iron spheres found did not have the chemical composition of fly ash or any process like the one proposed of iron flakes being liberated and subsequently vaporising. In fact the iron spheres had Al, K , O , and importantly sulphur ! .http://www.ae911truth.org...http://journalof911studies.com...If its expected that these iron spheres would be found according to RJ lee then doing an experiment or finding a source in which an office fire could produce spheres like the ones found at 911 shouldn't be too hard. If anyone can produce iron spheres in any way which would produce iron spheres with the chemical composition found in the WTC dust please speak up . The only known way of producing the spheres with that chemical composition is a thermitic reaction to produce the spheres in a different way shifts the burden of proof onto you or RJ Lee. -Molten iron spheres were not the only strange spheres found in the dust, also molten molybdenum was found Molybdenum spherule in the USGS data setTwo of the authors pursued a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action with the USGS to obtain any additional SEM/XEDS data from them which had not been previously published. The new data demonstrated, significantly, that the USGS team had observed and studied a molybdenum-rich spherule which was not mentioned in the earlier reports.We emphasize these data because of the extremely high melting temperature of molybdenum, and the observation of this molybdenum-rich spherule. Molybdenum is a refractory metal known for its extremely high melting point [9]. Mo melts at 2,623 °C (4,753 °F) [10], although addition of other elements may lower the melting point. No explanation of the high temperature needed to form the observed Mo-rich spherule is given in the USGS material (either published or obtained by FOIA action).-Con states that large ammounts of molten steel would have been found if thermite was used, it was http://rethink911.org...watch video .Moving on to the liquid flowing from the south tower. The melting point of iron is lowered by a eutectic mixture in Thermate, sulphur added to the thermitic reaction lowers the melting point to 980c-1050c .Compare the color of the molten material flowing from the south tower to thermate its the same.http://www.youtube.com...This explains why the spheres had sulpur.This also explains why the steel found in WTC 7 had holes melted through it like swiss cheese and had been sulphidized.FEMA quotes “No clear explanation for the source of sulfur has been identified.” Independent researchers challenge the argument that such a reaction could have resulted from the building’s normal contents:“[T]o form a molten iron-oxygen-sulfur eutectic at about 1000° C would require a very high concentration of sulfur… The fact that sulfur evaporates at a low temperature, 445° C, along with the very low levels of elemental sulfur in office buildings appears to preclude the possibility that the eutectic could have formed as a result of a slow sulfidation process in the debris pile.”http://rethink911.org...-Getting back to the molten metal flowing from the south twoerCon states the molten metal came from inside the building , I agree. Con states that its unfounded to state the metal is approximatley at the melting point .This is not unfounded as metals are a great conducter of heat, aluminium as shown in the previous video loses its yellow color instantly as it hits colder metal this is because the aluminium conducts its heat to the colder metal almost instantaneously.Thermite however continues reacting causing it to keep its temperature, Its not about how long it will take steel to cool but rather how long the thermitic reaction lasts for the iron to cool out into spheres . I dont see a silver color at the end of the video sorry.NIST, FEMA nor any independant scientist has1.Produced an experiment in which iron spheres could produce the XEDS found in the WTC dust.2.Produced an experiment in which steel could have been melted forming sulphidized steel.3.Produced an experiment in which molybdenum could have been melted in such conditions.4.Produced an experiment in which lead vaporizes. 5.Produced an experiment in which aluminum can flow like that at that color.6.Explained why so many witnesses saw molten steel .7. Why the temperatures lasted for almost 1 year after 911! [1] RJ Lee Group, WTC Dust Signature Report, December, 2003, available here: http://www.nyenvirolaw.org...% 20Documents/Signature%20of%20WTC%20dust/WTC%20Dust%20Signature.Composition%20and%20Morp hology.Final.pdf ; and http://www.nyenvirolaw.org...% 20Documents/Signature%20of%20WTC%20dust/WTCDustSignature_ExpertReport.051304.1646.mp.pdf [2] Heather A. Lowers and Gregory P. Meeker . Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust, available here: http://pubs.usgs.gov... [3] http://pubs.usgs.gov..., and http://pubs.usgs.gov... . [4] http://pubs.usgs.gov... . [5] RJ Lee Group, WTC Dust Signature Report, Composition and Morphology, December, 2003, Table 3. Note that this sample was acquired close to the WTC complex and thus may have more of the dense Fe-sphere content than dust samples acquired at greater distances. [6] http://www.webelements.com..., http://physchem.ox.ac.uk... [7] http://ceramic-materials.com... [8] http://www.chemicalelements.com... [9] http://www.rembar.com... [10] http://www.webelements.com... [11] http://chemicalland21.com...