911 inside job

Alright well I guess this one will be pretty simple. I'm guessing your wanting to keep this short since your only going to be arguing 1 single point and since your first argument was only a paragraph long. So Ill break my argument up into two segments. In this round I will not present any evidence or facts or counter arguments but instead, will ask you just a few questions. Since almost every truther theory is based on the "just asking questions" thing, I think this will be appropriate. Next round will be the one where I actually bring forth my arguments. Now there's just one thing I want to bring up here before I begin and that's just that in the future rounds Id like to see a little more, anything really, out of you. As the instigator of this debate burden of proof usually falls to you and you really haven't made any argument whatsoever or provided any proof. I'm not being an arse here just giving you some friendly tips to help make you better for future debates. You showed us a video and said "that's molten steel and it proves that 9/11 was an inside job." Ok well... how, exactly? How do you know that's molten steel, how does molten steel prove that incendiary devices were used, how does any of that prove that 9/11 was an inside job, where is the proof, the evidence, the facts. These are the things you need to tell the audience. Makes a much better argument then "here's a video, see the sparks and orange liquid stuff, it proves 9/11 was an inside job." Once again, how?Any how, on to my questions.Q1. You say that this is molten steel and that the only way that there could have been molten steel is if there was some sort of incendiary devices, most likely thermite, to cause it. So my main question is if this was true and thermite was used. Why in the hell would they put it all the way up at the place where the planes impacted? What purpose would those devices serve up there? I know your a fan of the "controlled demolition" theory so why would they need to use them all the way up there? Would the devices in the basement area not serve the purpose? How would they have been able to place these devices all the way up there without anyone noticing? Q2. Why do we only see sparks and such in places where the impact area was? Why not all over the building? Are you suggesting that they were able to plan EXACTLY where each plane would hit and only placed the devices in this area? And were somehow able to remote trigger these devices at their whim the exact way they wanted it to? Q3. This ones pretty simple. As of September 2001. Were there any devices whatsoever that would allow thermite to cut through a vertical column? Do you know what thermite is and how it works? Q4. If controlled demolition was their plan the entire time to make the towers collapse what was the purpose of the planes??? Seriously why wouldn't they just plant the incendiary devices and then claim that the terrorist did it? They could have easily done this and the results would have been the exact same except now there would be far less things for people like you to come up with. Seems like a pretty big mistake to make epically for this group that apparently are the masterminds of the greatest cover up in human history and are probably geniuses in order to think and pull it off. Your telling me they didn't plan ahead and see these little intricacies that some collage kid on you tube could see? Not buying it.Q5. You said "The video above clearly shows incendiary devices,"Could you please tell us how? I watched it several times and still haven't been able to find the thermite device on there. Could you circle where you see it and show it to us? Caused unless you can see the actual device then no, this video does not "clearly show" anything.Q6. How do you know this is molten steel?Well that will just about do it for me as of now. Like I asked earlier, please just put a little more effort in your next round. Otherwise this just wont be all that fun.