Sasquatch does not exist

My opponent says that Bigfoot has not gone unnoticed and has been sighted many times. It is true that many Sasquatch sightings have taken place (a few thousand in America over roughly one hundred years). This high number of reported sightings often gives Bigfoot believers a reason to argue that Bigfoot exists. I on the other hand believe that this high number of reported sightings actually make it easier to argue that Bigfoot does NOT exist. If thousands of people have seen Bigfoot, then why have not one of these people managed to get solid evidence of their sightings. The closest thing that anyone has gotten to solid evidence are blurry videos from a far distance away. You would think that in the decade where most teenagers have a smart phone that we would get some better footage and evidence. Or why wouldn't anyone chase down Bigfoot, or at least find the area where he was and collect DNA samples? There is just no way that out of thousands of reported sightings, not one person has gathered conclusive evidence to give proof. All they would need to do is go find a piece of hair that fell off Bigfoot in the area that they saw it and "Ta-dah", Bigfoot is proven real. But has anyone found any hair, any bones, any evidence of a Bigfoot shelter, or even taken a clear conclusive video or Bigfoot? No. Nobody has. If Bigfoot is so sneaky that they can not only hide themselves, but their dna too for so long, then congratulations mankind, you have been outsmarted by a bunch of wild apes. My opponent also mentions that there are people such as the "top 10 most wanted" that cannot be found. When I said, "In America we have the technology, skill, and intelligence to track down a person hiding anywhere in the country" I said A person, not ANY or EVERY person. There are a few people that have the ability and intelligence to hide from the FBI. But to say that Bigfoot can hide as well or better than the people in the top 10 most wanted is just silly. This part of my argument will again be information directly quoted from http://listverse.com... "Lack of Killings Despite Reward" "I"ll begin this entry by mentioning that there is currently a genuine $1,000,000 reward for anyone who can bring back the body of a Sasquatch. Think about that for just a moment. Now consider the the tens of thousands of reported sightings " none of which have resulted in a Bigfoot being shot dead. Once again, the figures simply do not add up." "Bigfoot is a Hoaxer"s Paradise" "Although this does not directly disprove the existence of Bigfoot, it is important to point out that there are plenty of motives for people to create a hoax. People may simply seek attention, fame or wealth " just like the men who covered an ape suit with a dead squid (pictured above) to try and cash in on that $1,000,000 reward." "Lack of Physical Evidence" "For a minute, let us imagine that we have had tens of thousands of giant ape-men roaming around North America since the fifties. Surely such creatures would leave us at least one piece of indisputable physical evidence? Alas, we have none at all " no bones, hair samples, blood samples, skin samples, or any DNA evidence of any kind." "One single hair strand would provide enough DNA to prove a new species existed. Besides, you can forget about DNA evidence for a moment to ask: where are the bodies? Unless sasquatches are immortal, there must be hundreds of Bigfoot remains out there right now. Why hasn"t anyone ever found one? We seem to have found plenty of footprints " but of course, that isn"t physical evidence." "All things considered, it seems that we can safely assume that there are no ape men in North America." This next quote is from http://news.discovery.com... ""There is no category of Bigfoot evidence that doesn't have a string of hoaxes attached to it," said Radford. "If you're studying a subject in which virtually all the evidence either comes down to being inconclusive or a hoax, something's wrong.""