JJ Abrams is a bad director

http://www.rottentomatoes.com...http://www.rottentomatoes.com...http://www.rottentomatoes.com...http://www.rottentomatoes.com...http://www.rottentomatoes.com...Movies JJ Abrams has directed have averaged 85.6% from critics and 83.2% from viewers according to Rotton Tomatoes, the go-to source for ratings of moviesWhen you factor in Metacritic, the second most major source for movie ratings, the reception still holds upMission Impossible 3 = 'Generally favorable reviews'Star Trek = 'Universal AcclaimSuper 8 = 'Generally favorable reviews'Star Trek Into Darkness = 'Generally favorable reviews'The Force Awakens = 'Universal Acclaim'. https://en.wikipedia.org...https://en.wikipedia.org...(film) #Reception. https://en.wikipedia.org...(film) #Critical_response. https://en.wikipedia.org...https://en.wikipedia.org...A director cannot be considered 'terrible' if literally all of his movies are liked by film critics and general audiences 2) Financial Success of films JJ Abrams has directedThe only other means of telling if a movie is a good movie other than overall reviews of the film is how much money the movie makes. Its certainly not a foolproof means of determining how good or bad a movie is, but more often then not, well made and well directed movies will make more money than poorly directed movies. List of JJ Abrams directed movies and how much money they made:Mission Impossible 3 = $400 millionStar Trek = $385 million (Second highest in franchise)Super 8 = $260 millionStar Trek into Darkness = $450 million (Franchise high)Star Wars 7 = >$1 Billion (Franchise high)The average gross of JJ Abrams' films he has directed is $500 million each AND CLIMBING as The Force Awakens continues to dominate in the box office. .. . It is impossible that movies made from a 'terrible' director routinely go on to average $500 million in income, meaning that JJ Abrams cannot be considered a terrible director. Even if you dont count Star Wars, the new average income of JJ Abrams movies still averages $300 million each, which considering the amount of money it costs to make the movies in the first place (listed below), indicates that JJ Abrams is a great director, since all of his films he has directed have been financially successfulMission Impossible 3 = $150 million to make, grossed $400 million. .. .. .. .. .. .. $250 million in profitStar Trek = $150 million to make, grossed $385 million. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . $235 million in profitSuper 8 = $50 million to make, grossed $260 million. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. $210 million in profitStar Trek Into Darkness = $185 million to make, grossed $465 million. .. .. .. .. $289 million in profitStar Wars 7 = $200 million to make, grossed $1 Billion and counting. .. .. .. .. .. $800 million in profit and climbing. https://en.wikipedia.org...https://en.wikipedia.org...(film)https://en.wikipedia.org...(film)https://en.wikipedia.org...https://en.wikipedia.org...So not only are literally all of the films JJ Abrams has directed gone on to be liked by film critics and general audiences, his movies he has directed routinely gross very large sums of money and always have made more money than what they cost to be filmed. .. .. ..