Catholic Christianity's beliefs are false

1. You saying there's no record of the virgin birth being debated doesn't tell me anything. When you said "the opposition form conservative religionists at the time suggests that any doctrine could be called into question." are you trying to say it didn't happen, but it never said it for sure happened? It's still a Catholic belief that it occurred, and I'm arguing against Catholic beliefs. 2. Haha, well, I didn't say it "must necessarily be wrong", I said it "gives off the vibe" that they might be wrong. I'm just trying to see the other perspective where different explanations (without any of them having support) makes them look wrong. Also, the difference between separate types of evolution and separate answers of where evil comes from is that each theory within evolution (Darwinism) is a theory based off the facts that invented the theory of evolution itself. Where evil comes from is not based on facts, but unsupported beliefs. 3. You're wrong here completely. I don't think every religion has the same beliefs, I just think that, for example, arguments against one god existing works against just about every other god existing. Where did you get me thinking every religion is the same? 4. I don't feeling like looking to see if it's credible to be honest. I've heard most people say (even some Christians) that he wasn't documented by anyone, and now you're saying this. Someone is obviously wrong, though I'm not sure who. Anyways, I didn't get any refutation on the Jesus-Joseph parallels and how these beliefs of Jesus walking on water and born on December 25th being unoriginal. Is this because you didn't have an argument back or you forgot? There seems to be evidence that he did exist and evidence that he didn't, so we might just end up disagreeing on which is better. PS- I know this is besides the debate, but I noticed you are an atheist, so you don't believe in Jesus, right? 5. Every adult Christian I know (nearly everyone I know is Catholic) takes the approach of thr Bible often being allegorical. My religion teacher (hardcore Catholic), all the parents in the area, etc. So I guess what I'm saying is it is universal. My religion teacher actually once told me that all Catholic Christians take this approach (called "contextualist"). 6. Come on. The argument is: why do Catholics say god is good if he sends people to hell for making human mistakes. Plus, according to the rules of mortal sin, 90 something percent of people are going to hell. I thought the argument was pretty obvious when I said nobody deserves to go to hell, which is pretty clear if you ask me. 7. This isn't at all extraordinary evidence that the Catholic god exists. 8. You're right, sometimes it is hard. This doesn't mean you should just assume that it's allegory because it doesn't make sense any other way. The Bible would be an example of when it is hard to say whether or not it's allegorical, as oppose to when it's easier to see. Again, I was taught this is one of two types of Christianity (other being literalist) by the most devout of Christians- my religion teacher. 9. Yeah. 10. Refutation as well in #2. 11. I never stated that I would only argue the content. Arguing the origin does just as well to prove Catholicism isn't probable.