If you think that I should not walk near the swamp, then be ready to debate else do not answer.

"To your above on how the van was speeding in a residential area, not having a license and driving on the wrong lane. This is all clearly an indication that there is something wrong with driver and the way he drives. Obviously, if you were smart you would tried to avoid the situation if you knew something was wrong." 1.) I am not a psychic that I knew something was wrong. Had I been one then I would have utilized the same ability in the casino and earned lots of money rather than under-utilizing it just for knowing that whether a van which is switching to a wrong side of the road. 2.) I never mentioned that I knew it from before. It was only after the splashing took place that when I asked the security guard about the van and he gave me the details. Next day, when I saw the same van, then I realized that it did not even had any indications about the school and contact numbers etc. 3.) Is it humanly possible for anyone to know about what is written in a van which is speeding in just matter of seconds to move in advance of just one or two seconds because the van has switched to the wrong side of the road and it would splash me? I do not think that it is humanly possible to run away at a distance of 2-3 meters in just a second for any human being. Had it been so then I would have been in the Guinness Book of World Records. "I completely understand that the situation is not completely avoidable. However It is not true to say that there is no choice available. Knowing the situation you should have been able to comprehend it and run away or avoid the swamp as you would get splashed or even killed if the van ran over you. There is a law implied in your country however, you can't expect everyone to follow the law all the time. In the future, you do have a choice." 1.) So, you have agreed yourself that the situation was not completely avoidable. 2.) As I already stated, I never mentioned that I knew it from before. It was only after the splashing took place that when I asked the security guard about the van and he gave me the details. Next day, when I saw the same van, then I realized that it did not even had any indications about the school and contact numbers etc. 3.) Is it humanly possible for anyone to know about what is written in a van which is speeding in just matter of seconds to move in advance of just one or two seconds because the van has switched to the wrong side of the road and it would splash me? I do not think that it is humanly possible to run away at a distance of 2-3 meters in just a second for any human being. Had it been so then I would have been in the Guinness Book of World Records. 4.) I have paid the road tax just like the driver of the van has paid. Therefore, I have the right to use the road safely when I fulfilled the duty of not walking in the middle of the road where his van was being driven and it was his duty to not to splash by coming next to the footpath where I was walking, if he is given the right to use the middle of the road. Else, if I cannot expect safety, then: a.) I should not be paying taxes. b.) I should also be given the right to come in middle of the road while he should avoid me by taking the side of the road. THEREFORE, IT IS UNFOUNDED TO SAY THAT WE CANNOT EXPECT EVERYONE TO FOLLOW LAWS AS TOMORROW THEY MIGHT EVEN GO FEW STEPS AHEAD AND RAM THE VAN INSIDE MY BEDROOM AND THEN KILL ME. IN THAT CASE, YOU CANNOT EXPECT ME TO LIVE UNDERGROUND OR IN THE AIR, CAN YOU? LOL!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!!! If he does not follow the law and only I have to do and I have burdened with all the duties while he has all the rights of the world, tomorrow he might even ram the van inside my bedroom of the house. Then are you going to say that I should not have resided at that locality also? If there is inequality of distribution of rights and duties "You can either take a safer path back home on another route which is not next the road/swamp or continue walking near the swamp ignoring the advice not to "walk near the swamp" and potentially getting splashed again." 1.) If a safer path is located 10 miles away, do you expect me that just to avoid getting splashed I should waste one hour or even fuel and money when the same can be saved by instructing the driver to drive carefully? 2.) If a comet is likely to strike the earth, is it a feasible solution to deflect the comet's path or destroy the comet itself or is it feasible to change your planet which you live in, i.e. earth? "If you are intelligent you should not have walked near the swamp/ tried to avoid it when you knew there was something wrong with the driver." 1.) If you are rational, then you would have made a complaint to the authorities and the traffic police, like I did, and instruct the driver to drive carefully rather than just avoid walking near the swamp because it only encourages him to be more rash and tomorrow he might even ram the van inside your bedroom and then it is totally unavoidable as you cannot live in the air or underground, and suffer suffocation and compromise on your personal benefits of a garden and swimming pool in your house just because the driver is rash. 2.) What you are suggesting is a Cinderella surgery, i.e. to fit in the shoes, instead of making the shoe longer or finding a shoe which is long enough, you chop off your toes. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROFL-LOL!!! :D :D :D :D :D.