Can God create a rock so big he can't lift it, or not create the rock? either, not @ same time

You seem to be mistaken with what logic is. Logic is a nature of God. God cannot act illogically, as that is His nature. You first say "it is not illogical in the sense that if God confines himself to time and space, then that is a committment he can't break." But God cannot be confined, because he is omnipresent. So that position is invalid. It goes against the law of non-contradiction. Next you say "in some sense it is illogical, because as i argued, god can always switch gears and act illogically." But how do you know God can act illogical? If logic is God"s nature, then he wouldn"t be illogical, because all truth is in him. He isn"t bound by his lesser creation, just like when we make pottery, we aren"t bound to live inside of it. Also, logic doesn"t disprove God's existence, because logic deals with the correct chain of reasoning from premise to conclusion, as I will emphasize latter on. Logic only proves that God exists in a perfect way. It only proves that he is all powerful, because being omnipotent means that you are not non-omnipotent. God is above all and self-sustaining, thus further proving his omnipotence. Finally you state "it all depends on if God wants to abide by logic or not." Logic is necessary to understand God"s omnipotence and omnipresent. Also, logic is the nature of God. Without it, we could just use contradictions when describing God"s nature. Logic isn"t a restriction to God, it allows him to be who he is, and is his character. The only way to argue against this is to use laws of logic, which presupposes God. A law needs a law giver. Without God, you can"t have an origin of the laws of logic. This may seem circular, because it is. Circular reasoning isn"t always arbitrary though when you are talking about an ultimate standard for what all other things must be based upon. All chains of reasoning must have an ultimate end/ beginning. That beginning, that highest standard, is God. This is taken from the preconditions of intelligibility argument. Logic is presupposed, but then after presupposed, must have an origin. That origin is God. The only way to argue against it is to use logical reasoning, which already presupposes God. God cannot deny Himself (2 Tim. 2:13) and all truth is in God (John 14:6; Col. 2:3), therefore truth will not contradict itself. The question you pose in the beginning itself misrepresents God and reality. If you try arguing logically, you prove my position to be correct, because logic presupposes the God who does not apply to the question. "Laws of logic are God's standard for thinking. Since God is an unchanging, sovereign, immaterial Being, His thoughts would be necessarily be abstract, universal, invariant entities. In other words, they are not made of matter, they apply everywhere, and at all times. Laws of logic are contingent upon God's unchanging nature. And they are a prerequisite for logical reasoning. Thus, rational reasoning would be impossible without the biblical God." -Dr. Jason Lisle Your illogical question doesn't disprove God's existence. At the same time, the existence of logic proves God's existence. If anything is unclear, I can try to clarify. This can sometimes be a complicated subject to understand.