Homosexual adoption

I believe there was some confusion. "If you read your words properly, in this argument once again you agreed with me, and said that being homosexual is wrong. You said that if the kid is not homosexual, he will do what is right and not become one. (paraphrased)" Paraphrased or not, what I meant by the quote you picked from my argument is that IF the adopted child is not a homosexual, the parents will encourage him to do what is right, he will do what is right, and not become one. However, if the child IS a homosexual, he will become one. It was arguing against your point claiming that adopted children of homosexuals would follow the footsteps of their parents. It was my way of saying that they will only become homosexuals if they truly are, and if they are not, they will not become one. Now, I must accuse you of purposefully starting and ending quotes in places that help you and ignoring the bigger picture. Essentially, I'm saying that you quoted what I said, not what I meant. "Firstly, you have claimed that homosexuals can be child molesters. That is not really true however. Most child molesters who molest children are not homosexuals in truth. And, some molest children of the same gender due to their deprivation of sexual intercourse with the other gender. But homosexuals are not child molesters. " Firstly, notice how I said "can" and not "are" in the first sentence. I do however say "But homosexuals are not child molesters" in the last sentence. However, the next sentence shows that I am not saying that you are claiming all homosexuals to be molesters. I am simply using it as a transition into my next point of the argument. The next few sentences were... "People are. Human beings are. People of all races, genders, sexual preferences, etc. Also, if that is the case, should African Americans not be allowed to have children because they are all murdering drug addicts or drug dealers? Of course not. That, as your point is, is simply a stereotype (which if I recall you have accused me of including in my own arguments.)" This shows that I was saying there are some homosexuals who may be child molesters, however, it's not just homosexuals, but people in general. It also leads me to my next point, that if we should be able to prevent homosexuals from adopting, why can't we stop black people from having children. Better yet, why don't we just not allow black people in public or out of executive's branch supervision? A great sum of criminals happen to be African American. So, why can't we just put them all under house arrest or something? Because that's simply unfair. Also, their are requirements for adopting a child. Not just anybody can walk in and adopt a child. There is a process and a background check. So, if the couple are child molesters, they can be denied. If they hide it, then the issue is not that homosexuals are adopting children, the issue is that the process for adopting a child needs to be improved. Heterosexuals do adopt also, yes, this is true. However, not all do, and if a safe homosexual couple wants to adopt a child, why should we leave the child in the orphanage until some heterosexual couple comes? "First of all, fitting it. Many teenagers and children nowadays need to 'fit in'." This WAS a stereotype and there is no evidence to back this up, and no citation next to the paragraph. So, I will say again, that there is no reason not to allow homosexuals to adopt children. There are background checks for adopters, and if that is not enough, then either no child should be adopted or better background checks must be done, as not allowing a homosexual couple adopt is unconstitutional. The only way to legally do this is to make the background checks better, or no orphaned child may be adopted. I will say that sometimes the Constitution is not always correct in my opinion, however, in this case it is. You are putting blame on a group of people for child molestation by saying that homosexuals shouldn't be able to adopt because most molesters are homosexuals. If you weren't, your argument would be that people shouldn't be allowed to adopt because it puts the child at risk of being molested. But you blamed homosexuals for something that others do. If this was to become a law, homosexuals would be angry as they would not be able to adopt, and children would still be molested and not just by homosexuals. You're arguing for injustice.