0.999...Does not equal 1

Well, this has been fun, hasn't it?Pro either can't or purposefully won't answer my questions.That's fine.Opt-in voters will take note and vote Con.*Review*Aside from clearly showing that 9 + 0.999... = 10 (0.999...) thereby making 0.999... = 1, I provided a very quick, easy example of this fact with 1/3.When you divide 1 by 3 you MUST get 0.333...When you divide 0.999... by 3 you also get 0.333...When you multiply ANY NUMBER by 1/3 you get the same answer if you multiply that same number by 0.333..., so 3 (1/3) = 3 (0.333...) or another way we could say it is 3 (0.999.../0.333...) = 1.The number 1/3 basically destroys Pro's case by its mere existence as a rational decimal that repeats infinitely and can be used in standard arithmetic.I also pointed out that,1 - 0.9 = 0.11 - 0.99 = 0.011 - 0.999 - 0.001but that when you attempt this same subtraction with the infinite decimal 0.999..., there's no LAST 9 and therefore, in the difference, there is no last 1 so 1 - 0.999... = 0.000...Zeroes to infinity is still equal to zero.*Responding to Pro*While I know that Pro cannot respond to this, Pro has said, within this debate, that 1/3 and 0.333... aren't equal or the same thing, so I need to respond to Pro's assaults on the truth.Pro lies:"We've already agreed that infinity is not a number."My response:No, readers can check the debate, I never once agreed to that and, given the uncontested-therefore-no-reason-to-reject definition of infinity from the 2nd round, INFINITY IS A NUMBER!infinity - a NUMBER greater than any assignable quantity or countable number.https://en.oxforddictionaries.com...Pro didn't question the credibility of the source, Oxford Dictionaries, and made no attempt to demonstrate why/how the definition is wrong...he just asserts it.Pro conflates:"when 0.999.. has a string of 9s that go on for infinity."My response:Simply because something goes on infinitely does not make it infinity.If this were the case, then all rational decimals that repeat infinitely would have the same value, infinity, and multiplying by 1/3 (0.333...) would be the same as multiplying by 2/3 (0.666...).Pro would have you believe that there is no difference between 1/3 and 2/3 because both equal infinity.What a garbage argument, I mean, even for Pro.Pro lies again:"Let's prove that infinity - infinity is not 0 as con has assumed."My response:I have not once mentioned this in the debate, so Pro cannot say "Con has assumed," because I never mentioned this at all.Check the debate.Pro's following infinity - infinity argument is a straw man argument, an argument that was never constructed by me.Also, 0.999... ISN'T INFINITY!!!So Pro's "proof" is really irrelevant.Pro perceives:"It seems my opponents arguments weighs heavily on calculators agreeing with him."My response:Ugh.While trusting a calculator over Pro is CERTAINLY a good idea, even if calculators did not exist, 1/3 would be a RATIONAL DECIMAL THAT DOES NOT EQUAL INFINITY and I urge EVERYONE to divide 1 by 3 without a calculator and see if you get to 0.333...Man, that was another garbage argument from Pro!Pro errors:"It's clear that con has misunderstood that there is a need for infinite decimals in the base 10 system."My response:I've already said that 0.999... and 0.333... are INFINITE decimals; they're just not INFINITY.I also understand their role within the decimal system, hence 1/3 = 0.333...Pro lies:"Despite the fact that I've answered all of cons questions in my previous rounds."My response:Yeah like how Pro answered the question "What's the difference between the product of 3 times 1/3 and the product of 3 times 0.333...?"Oh wait, he never answered it AND I've already indicated his lack of response to it, so voters should take note...twice.Pro buries himself:"I urge voters to not lose track of the important arguments made."My response:And that should do it voters!Do not lose track of all relevant, resolution-impacting arguments made and give a proper opt-in vote.Thanks for the debate, Pro.Thanks for the win opt-in voters.