Islamic State is good.

FRAMEWORK:The main contention of the debate now is not "did the Islamic State do more harm than good" to Syria, but was it "good" in the sense that was defined in R1. Now, I believe, the limits and exclusiveness of "good" was defined to some sort of objectivity; i.e complete compliance with UDHR, Geneva Convention, and Categorical Imperatives. Apart from this, I remembered only agreeing to "CNN" and "BBC" and not "Stars and Stripes" Henceforth, the contentions of argumentation from ad hominem genetics could be easily dismissed asmoving the goalposts.O1. IS Kills ChildrenThe Islamic State kills civilians and children. We have a concession here, and if we apply the parameters of this debate upon this point, the Islamic State did moral wrong in it's executions of these two Sunnis. Now, this rationalization of murder is highly uncalled for at this point. The shame-naming of the opposition shall be addressed here.This video was shot soon after the break between al-Nusra and the Islamic State, so it would have been impossible for J. al-Nusra to film this. Apart from this, we take upon it as a concession that the opposition states that this is an on balance debate, not a good/bad debate. However, the resolution states that the Islamic State is "good" not "on balance, the IS has been more beneficial" Henceforth, this point I considered fully negated.Now, accordingly to the opposition's accusations, he has clearly ignored the parameters of good/bad that was presented in R1, and the fact that he never refutes them is a show that he condones the definitions. One of the conditions was anything "good" was permissible under Islamic Law. Now, the interpretation of Islamic Law follows from several parameters. The first and foremost is the Holy Quran, the second is the Hadiths, the third is reason and the last is compromise. The latter two (especially the last parameter) has led many to corrupt the true nature of the humanitarian thought of Islamic philosophy. I quote from a Hadith the following: 'Abdullah that a woman was found killed in one of the battles fought by the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him). He disapproved of the killing of women and children. Now is this "good"? I believe that I have provided tonnes of evidence based on the Muslim faith that shows that Islam does not condone killing, on balance. Now, if this is not enough, need I talk about the Yazidi Genocide. After the taking of Sinjar, 70,000 Yazidis were forced to flee; 500 Yazidis were killed soon after the Islamic State took over, and many are still now living under the IS's reign of terror! Even the Kurds are not free from this; many Kurds, who are overwhelmingly Sunni, are being forced from their homes and being killed by the Islamic State! True, there are some Kurdish fighters in the IS, but need I remind the voters of the fighters in Ayn Al-Arab, who are only gaining ground after attacks; besieged by the Islamic State, the fighting here has seen at least 1,000 dead, and many more wounded. [1,2]UN Reports notes this frightening encounter: "The ISIS emir answered me in a harsh tone: “Why? Do you have your house here? Do you have your village here? This is not your village and you have no house. I don’t want to see you talk about a house here. You don’t belong here. By tomorrow not one of you will remain here or come back here"O2. IS kills Non-MuslimOnce again, I refer to the prinicple of good/evil in context with the parameters of this debate. Good is defined as anything that is not "Haram". Evil is anything that is "Haram". Now, I would like to go in much more depth about the concept of Jizya, and how that differs from Zakat. The fundamental fact that those who pay Zakat are exclusively Muslim, and Zakat is a Muslim Concept which derives from Quranic Verses proves that Zakat is not "tax" for non-Muslim. In a just society, a person must never be taxed on his fundamental basic human rights. No just governments have taxed their people for breathing the air; they tax their people for state services spent. The concept of Jizya is wholly unjust on this part; for Jizya refers to the taxation of a human's right to practice any form of worship of God that they want. Now, I see the opposition's negation of the main conception of Jizya as not a tax for non-Muslims exclusively. However, I quote this in al-Razi's interpretation of Quranic Verse 9:29:The intention of taking the jizya is not to approve the disbelief of non-Muslims in Islam, but rather to spare their lives and to give them some time.The Quranic Verse 9:29 states this:Fight until they [the non-believers] give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. Upon this, the opposition argues from ad hominem and genetics, and I should like to say that this is a debate, not a Sophist convention. Fake sources? The parameters of such are only limited to the fact the websites of CNN and BBC the last time I checked. Based upon a fallacious position, I would like to dismiss the fake sources as the duty of the voter to vote fairly.Apart from this, we have more than enough evidence to show that the Islamic State kills Christians. Linked is a collection of pictures from Mosul and IS occupied Syria that shows a plethora of evidence that the Islamic State kills, murders, tortures and harrasses Christian minorities, especially children and women. [1,5,8]O3. EducationThe opposition is wrong in his synopsis. This is what the mandate says:1. The following subjects are to be definitively abolished from teaching programs: artistic musical education [music], nationalist education, social studies, history, artistic composition education [drawing], sport, philosophical, social and psychology studies, Islam-Christian religious education), to be replaced by subjects added in compensation by the directorate of programs in the Islamic State. There is no definite proof of these classes being taught in IS occupied Iraq and Syria, but there is definite inferences that could be made from such a statement like the one provided above. If the opposition wants to deny this, then I shall challenge him to find any decree that overthrows the current decree now. [4]O4. HealthcareStop blaming everything on President Bashar al-Assad; the main goals of the Islamic State has been revealed soon after the obstruction of a huge medical package to al-Raqqah. It was made much clearer when the Islamic State ordered the execution of 5 doctors from Sep. to October. It also reportedly converted many hospitals to torture and detention centers for IS militants. Accordingly to the United Nations: ISIS has set up detention centres in former Government prisons, military bases,hospitals, schools and in private houses. I have been unable to see how the Islamic State could be considered "good" after what it has done in the Occupied Syria.O5. JusticeIt has been quoted in S3R1 that "the Islamic State will often kill those who take drugs" Now, I shall respond to the "baseless allegations" (which are in reality largely supported by sources) of IS killing Christians. IS kills Christians, and they do so without any mercy. Accordingly to the United Nations: Between September and October 2013, ISIS fighters attacked three Christian churches in Ar-Raqqah governorate, destroying the Greek Catholic church; occupying Al Shuhada Armenian Orthodox church in Raqqah city and burning an Armenian church in Tel Abyad. As ISIS spread throughout eastern Syria, Christians and their places of worship continued to be attacked. In September 2014, ISIS fighters destroyed an Armenian church in Dayr Az-Zawr. Regarding the Jizya tax:The Nineveh decree echoes one that the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, the former name for the Islamic State, issued in the Syrian city of Raqqa in February, demanding that Christians pay the jizya levy in gold and curb displays of their faith in return for protection.Justice much? What type of person carries gold in their pocket? The Islamic State has left no choice for these Christians but death and destruction. [2,3]O5. CurrencyI pretty much regard this contention is wholly affirmed. The printing of the Golden Dinar will inherently destroy the economics of the Islamic State, and it shall face some type of economic collapse in the future. Accordingly, there is this concept of "good" money and "bad" money. "Good" money is the ones that are actually worth a whole lot; "bad" money is paper money that have artificial worth. Grisham's law predicts that due to the desirability but rarity of "good" money, "bad" money will eventually replace "good" money. Considering the Islamic State to have no legitimacy over Iraq, and considering that Iraq is still printing it's money, the common prediction would be that IS money will eventually go bankrupt. With it goes the wheat and other materials that the region produces, causing an economic collapse, for wheat, oil and gold have an objective international real price. [8]With this, I consider the resolution negated. Peace be upon you!Citations:[1] http://www.catholic.org...[2] http://news.yahoo.com...[3] http://www.ohchr.org...[4] http://www.aymennjawad.org...[5] http://quran.com...[6] http://en.wikipedia.org...[7] [8] http://blog.foreignpolicy.com...