Homosexuality is natural and morally correct. Homophobia is morallly incorrect.

I. A. Homosexuality is morally correct because it involves love. B. Homosexuality also makes the other person happy, which is moral. C. Homosexuality often leads to adoption, which is moral. II. This is not the first time I've debated you and I've noticed you debate very strictly on the topicality. I'll let all the dropped arguments from topicality go. On to the debate! III. "Many religions explicitly state that Homosexuality is immoral. Christianity, which my opponent seems to accept as a valid source, is one of them. " No popular religion states that homosexuality is immoral. It is mythed that the Bible states this. It does instruct priests not to engage in homosexual behaviors as well as get tatoos, round haircuts or play football in Leviticus. The book also tells of how Sodom and Gamora was destroyed but in Ephesians it states that they were destroyed due to arrogance, not due to homosexual behaviors. You cannot find one example that determines that homosexuality is immoral. There are only 6 scriptures in the Bible that can be potentially used to attack Christianity. This was not one of God's priorities and certainly was not a sin. And if the judges are voting on the best debater, they will agree that homosexuality is never proven immoral by the Bible. IV. "Homosexuality creates unneeded complications with the standard family model. " A. I am given the impossible task of debating a negative. He never backs up this false assumption. Homosexuals are just as good parents as heterosexuals. Denying homosexuals rights like adoption creates unneeded complications with the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment Section 1's Equal Protection Clause. B. I do not know any of these complications so it is impossible for me to debate them, which is unfair. V. My opponenet has already agreed that homosexuality would be a bad choice if it was a matter of choice. This does not relate to the resolution! Homosexuality is still natural and moral. VI. "Also, do not let the fact that it may not be a matter of choice stop you from accepting that homosexuality is not morally correct. Psycho killers are often born that way, it's natural, sometimes it's not a choice they make, but it's still quite immoral. " Psycho killers are hurting people. Homosexuals are loving each other, which hurts nobody at all. Homosexuals are not equal to psycho killers in morality. VII. Also, consider that a morally neutral thing is not 'morally correct. ' Eating a biscuit is not morally correct, nor is it morally incorrect. VIII. "In my opponenet's dreamworld, law can only exist as an immoral thing [since that necessarily involves judging people]. " Law is morally incorrect. It involves judging people. If you can use the Bible to attack homosexuality [falsely I might add], I can use the Bible to attack you. Judging and revenge is morally incorrect as many religious books and books on morality state. Law may be helpful, maybe not. But THE RESOLUTION ASKS WHAT IS MORALLY CORRECT, NOT WHAT IS HELPFUL, OR NOT. IX. "People can't make decisions about whether or not to trust someone [since that necessarily involves judging people]. It is immoral to prefer one person to another [since that necessarily involves judging people]. Not only is this impossible, but it's down right stupid. Judging people is necessary, and there's nothing inherently wrong with it. " THE RESOLUTION IS ABOUT MORALITY! IF YOU CAN DROP MY ARGUMENTS DUE TO RESOLUTION, I'LL DO THE SAME! X. A. Homophobia often leads to villence, which is immoral. B. Homophobia is a form of prejudice, which is immoral. C. Homophobia involves judging others and condemning them, which is immoral. This is an obvious debate. XI. This was a very poor debate. My opponent used cheap topic arguments instead of substantially debating. He forced me to debate negatives. He used many untrue assumptions and lied to each of you. I hope he does a better job for the next two rounds. Sorry for the poor debate.