logic determines right and wrong thus morality

I accept.Contention 1: Logic=/=MoralityWe know that for a fact that the above equation is correct. How so you may ask? Say I place my hand on a hot stove. It is hot, and thus my hand will burn. That is logical, but is it morality? Let's define it. Morality- beliefs about what is right behavior and what is wrong behavior (http://www.merriam-webster.com...)Now Logical.Logical- agreeing with the rules of logic : sensible or reasonable (http://www.merriam-webster.com...)We know that it is logical that if you place your hand on a hot stove it will burn, but that does not mean that something is right or wrong. That is a fact not a sense of morality. What is morality grounded to? I'll get into that in a later conetntion. Contention 2: Morals are directly corrilated with God. Here we can observe Saint Thomas Aquinas's theory on teleologic which is the ultamate causes of objects or actions in relation to their ends. This is from the 5th of Thomas Aquinas's theories explaining the existance of God. His theory is bellow. 1. If teleology exists, then an ordering intellect exists.2. Teleology exists.3. Therefore, an ordering intellect exists. Here for the first part we may see that teleos exists on the basis that there must be intentionality and this exists in the mind. Hence one can see that if teleology truely exists then there must be intellect for it to be grounded to in the end. For this I site Edward Feser who states, "Where goal-directness is associated with consciousness, as it is in us, there is no mystery. A builder builds a house, and he is able to do so because the form of the house exists in his intellect because it is instantiated in a concrete particular object. And of course, the materials that will take on that form also exist already, waiting to take it on." [4] So ask yourself, does teleology exist? Obvious, does the heart beat and pump blood because it just happens? No, it has a valid purpose of pumping blood to keep you alive. Without teleology there would be no purpose. We can see that from everyday occurance by using this. I mean how else are we to say that a carborator needs replaced if it does not have a purpose? When we observe other things that are inorganic like the Nitrogen and Water Cycle we can see that they too have purpose and are thus teleological by nature. [5] We can see that since all teleology has to be grounded to a singel being in the universe. It is obvious that this high being has nothing else higher than it and is thus the greatest being in the universe which it would make sense to call this said being God. Here it is obvious that morals are related to God, but logic is not as though God may determine the rules of the unvierse and the laws of nature it does not corrilate into Logic=Morality. Belief in God may not always be logical for this I point to the works of Friedrich Nietzsche who showed us that "God is dead. And we have killed him." [6] This is to show that Humanity has killed God through the complication of God and the rites and rituals. He believed that God is to be celebrated out of the mystery of faith. So we can see that through the works of Nietzsche that logic has killed God and thus morality. So we can see that it is thus impossible for morality to equal logic or vise versa.4. ( Edward Feser, "Teleology: A Shopper's Guide," Philosophia Christi 12 (2010): 157)5. David S. Oderberg, "Teleology: Inorganic and Organic," in A.M. Gonz"lez (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Natural Law(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008): 259-796. (http://www.philosophy-index.com...)