is logic a subset of illogic

What is Logic?As mentioned above logic is defined as reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. Which simply states that you think coherently with what is provided to be true.This by extension infers that if someone is very logical it means that, with what is provided true, they can deduce, coherently, other concepts shown to them, and/or develop there own contraptions using only what is true.What are this "truths"?Truths encompass a number of things including the fundamental laws of nature and mathematics, for example, gravity, in addition to more relative truths such as economics and history.Is Logic Absolute?This is a very important question and the answer is no. For us there are a set of "principles of validity" that we adhere to, however, this does not mean that these set of principles extend to all reaches of The Universe at all times and to a degree even past the confines of The Universe. For example, in the moments after the big bang the 4 fundamental laws of nature were combined into one and the expansion of the universe was much greater than the speed of light, which has been supported by evidence of the effects of primordial gravitational fields on light rays. This and many other "principles of validity" have thus changed over time meaning that logic must change with them as it is dependent on these principles of validity. Equally, it is also believed that this is not the only universe which exists and string theory suggests there are many other universes which exist all with different dimensions and different laws of nature, and although this premise is based on speculation there is no reason suggesting otherwise. Even within physics the principles of validity seem to vary by significant amounts - Newton's laws of motion seem to describe the motion of macroscopic sized objects within the universe but break down when dealing with subatomic particles. definition:Validity1.the quality of being logically or factually sound; soundness or cogency.What does this mean?The fact that logic is not absolute means that it is relative, and so can be compared and contrasted, so from one perspective, a person who exists at a different time such as moments after the big bang would conclude that the universe we now exist in is illogical meaning the reasoning we deduce from our laws is thus also illogical and vica versa. So reasoning is in effect generally illogical because the laws always change.Tying it all inSo we can now consider everything as being illogical and a group of illogical laws become perceived as valid and coherent because we exist within that set and so become classified as logic - we can thus derive logic from illogic.and so instead of considering the two statements as mutually exclusive as shown here http://www.cs.uni.edu...;we can consider logic as being a subset of illogichttp://image.mathcaptain.com...(A is the set which is logical - it is time dependent and there can be more than one of these sets, some may even overlap, U is the universal set which is illogical) A key point to remember is that mathematics and physics are BASED on axioms and explain the laws of nature that we currently live in they do not define it suggesting that we can only which suggests how dependent logic is to the parameters of our existence.SummaryLogic is dependent on a set of principles which are illogical and thus causing logic itself to be logical to the people within that set whereas universally it is actually illogical.Sources:http://www.cs.uni.edu... http://image.mathcaptain.com...https://www.google.co.uk...;