The Following Quotes Effectively Refute Christianity

Understandings: _____________ The Christian God exists The Christian God possesses all attributes that are required for God to be the Christian God mainly Omni-Excellence, (All Omni-related attributes) This is a debate about Christianity being morally sound NOT the existence of God. _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Clarifications: I did not ask you to prove anything, what I am saying is that a real contention does not consist of petty name calling, I was pointing out that there must be specific examples of the God demonstrating what the quote is saying calling him, otherwise there is nothing for me to content, nor without them it is baseless and really, moot. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contention- System or Morality: Despite the quotes lacking anything to back them up I will continue. We both are assuming that God exists, therefore my opponents system of morality must be challenged. My opponent must prove that his system of Morality is the correct one, then prove that the quotes prove it to be undermined. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contention- Empty attacks, argument fallacies: I will reemphasize this argument. When one instigates that his quotes refute something such as morality, there must be examples, or evidence if you will of the occasions in which this is happening. Analogously, if I told Geo that he was the most Godforsaken, hideously dressed, ill tempered creature that ever existed, I would need cases or examples of him being Godforsaken, I would need instances in which he was hideously dressed, and i would need instances of him being ill tempered for any of that to actually mean he is any of those things that i am accusing him of. Without examples of him performing the accused actions, I have nothing. This is exactly what he is doing. His quotes accused God of being many things, yet provides nothing to show that he is actually any of those things. And without examples, the accused actions mean nothing. That is like trying to sue someone and telling the judge whatever it is your suing them about, without anything to show for evidence. That being said, his quotes hold no water for what they accuse him of. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contention- Burden of Proof: My opponent, the instigator and the challenger, must be able to defend his position; however, he has placed this burden of proof on his quotes, and like i stated in the previous contention, his quotes alone have nothing to back them up. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contention- Omnibenevolence and the Moral framework My opponent has stated that the Christian God is omnibenevolent, which is defined as "Moral perfection", "perfect goodness", and "desire to do good." -Dictionary.com/Reference.com Now, morality only exists within it's own framework, conceding that God has moral perfection, means that God has not been immoral in his own framework of morality. If my opponent disagrees, he must prove that HIS is the correct moral framework, and say why the Christian Gods is not the correct framework, then prove how his quotes effectively refute Christianity.