BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Microsoft Windows XP is by far the best OS that ahs ever existed.

My-croSoft XP is the best Operating System to ever exist. Fully customizable, Flexible, easy to navigate ; Microsoft XP was able to run on 256mbs of Ram smoother than a Dell Windows 10 with 8 gigs of ram and a terabyte of memory brand new off the shelf. Microsoft XP was the most energy efficient operating system and was compatible with all previous hardware and software, but the newer computers are not compatible with anything that was used in the 90's. not games, programs or files. Apples, is essentially useless as a home computer unless you have no interest in computers and only sue it to type, browse and use the programs which can in no way be Modded unless you hack the system. All apple programs which are compatible with Windows specifically damper all the computers specs permanently until You actually wipe the drive and reinstall the OS. Admittedly Linux was the hardest to hack, smoothest running etc... BUT, Windows XP made it viable, and without having windows XP available to you as an OS on your computer, you would regret having Linux. battlefield 2142, 1 gig ram, 64 player match, 500 gigs of memory, windows XP. far superior performance to modern tech. I would suggest all windows "upgrades" since were redundant. any security measures which were improved could have occurred in the Anti-virus. the fact of the matter is, Microsoft got sabotaged to make new OS's and it was unnecessary. Windows XP is the most Efficient OS and that, is an actual Fact. and that is why I think it is premium.
Microsoft Windows XP is by far the best OS that ahs ever existed.

My father was um.. 28 years old when he had me, His Firsts on, second of the 3 children. And He was athletic, skills, talented, social, smart, kinda and we had a blast. My dad played guitar my entire life without any formal training, filling the home with his own music, while all through my entire life my home was filled with music from more than five decades. It was a thrill ride coming home from school. He was never good at guitar. BUt his friends, were fawkign awesome at it. and they would jam together. My father Built doom-buggies on his hard earned cash. I drove our snow machine threw the house window when I was 7 years old. a 500 SKidoo touring. I still ride that machine. He bought 2 other crafty little snow machines, the cheetah and another one we were never able to get running for the kids. and it was a bomb. He bought me my bike, but HE biked 20 kilometers to work every day working shift work at a mill for the first 8 years of my life. He biekd to work from my new Mountaintop country lakeside home, and I biked 20 kilometers from here to my school every morning, because I could beat the bus to school, so I got to sleep in. I was allowed to drive my Nissan pathfinder to school because my bus ride was over an hour long. ps. I was 1 grade behind because I failed French emersion grade 1 classified as a handi-cap child because I didn't pay attention. My friend whom I remember form that school, taught himself Japanese and now lives in Japan. That is interesting, because My father married into a French family. I am 11th generation french Canadian, and 5th generation Canadian on my fathers Czech Ukrainian side - and although my Mom converted to Jehovah witness when I was in grade 11, He still goes to every birthday, holiday and family gathering they (my grandparents) have. They love him, and he loves them. My mom complains about my dad all the time, and although he has his problems, More often than not, He is always talking about the things she wants and needs. And He, my atheist father, provides all the things my mother needs without being told asked or prodded. No matter how many cars she has ditched, he fixes them all himself, because he is a handi mechanic. and so that is the first, a little bit messy portion of why I think MY dad is the bomb.
Evolution shouldn't be widely accepted... yet

Evolution is the most fact based theory and has logical premises and conclusions, which should therefore make it accepted. Just because something has not been proven fact does not mean it is not true nor logical. Let’s use an example: Say there are two fighters, Michael and Jordan. Michael is stronger, faster, has had more training, and has a far better record than Jordan. Jordan is slow, weak, has had little training, and has been defeated by men that are worse fighters than Michael. Even though it is not a proven fact that Michael will defeat Jordan in a fight, it is logical from the factual information gathered that Michael will defeat Jordan. Evolution unlike this fight is not as subjective of a matter. It does not rely on chance that it may be wrong unlike a fight where a lucky punch could win. Evolution is simply supported by factual evidence and is logical so it should therefore be accepted. Fossil Record A large amount of creatures that no longer exist today have existed in the past and have been found through fossilization. It can also be found that certain species existed later than others, but do not exist now. For example, the Tyrannosaurus Rex lived in the Cretaceous Period but not before. Where then could the dinosaur have come from? If we do not accept evolution as true then the T. Rex must have always existed and then died out, but we know this to be untrue. Evolution provides a logical answer that certain genetics in creatures were dominant, allowing them to survive. As these genetics continued to be passed on because they increased the survival of a species, and the dinosaurs without the genetics were more likely to die off, an entire new species eventually evolved out of these passed down genetics. So in order for a new species to exist a genetic mutation must occur and be dominant in an already existing species. Over time as this genetic mutation begins occurring frequently amongst a species, a new species is created. Adaptation Adaptation occurs when a species evolves to better survive in its environment. Birds are a primary example of this. Depending on the ecosystem a bird is in, their beaks may be different in order to better suit their needs. This is because genetic mutations which allowed a certain species to better survive became dominant eventually evolving the bird to better survive in its environment. Birds who live near rivers may have long beaks that are good for snatching fish out of the water. Birds that live in tropical forests may have long, thick curved beaks used for eating fruit. I think both of these are good examples supporting evolution, which has solid premises and a logical conclusion. This being said, evolution should therefore be accepted in order to further scientific progress and knowledge. Thank you.
ham or turkey for lunch

Today is the day I am eating my lunch, I have brought a ham sandwich due to the fact that thanksgiving is approximately 1 and a half months away the turkeys are young now and they may not be the right size by the time thanksgiving comes around, the farmers will give the turkeys steroids so that they will be a large enough size for the fat American families to eat. we don't want to feed the already fat Americans meats that have been tempered with steroids. it will make them even more unhealthy and ultimately put their lives at risk. George Taggart, the renowned health enthusiast says " ham is better than turkey". I have actual quotes where as you have been providing your opinions to fight your side of the argument.
ham or turkey for lunch

A very good comeback indeed, but I still stand by my side when I say turkey is better. I do like ham but not as much as turkey . The reason turkey is still better is that it is an "all around meat". Turkey can go with anything making it better in any way. Think about how many times has someone had a ham and bacon sandwich? I shutter at the thought of such a disgusting sandwich. Now, think about all the people who have a turkey and bacon sandwich. I shutter at the thought that some monster would not enjoy something that good. One last thing to think about before I am done with this comeback is that turkey is the main food in thanksgiving. How would we give thanks if ham a disgusting pig was the main course of thanksgiving? (we could not)
yo mamma jokes cmpetition.

yo mamma so stupid she, walked into an antique store and said 'what's new'? yo mamma so ugly, when she was beng born, when the doctor said 'push' her dad tried to push her back in yo mamma so fat, that when shelayd down on the beach, someone yelled 'beached whale!' yo mamma so fat, she went swimming in the mediteranian and was claimed as a new territory. yo mamma so fat, they need to cut away doorways to let her throuh(rather than just greasing them, because she's to fat to fit in them).
yo mamma jokes cmpetition.

i understand that i have went against the maximum amount of post but this is the last round so i might as well get it all out. Yo Momma so Smelly the government make her wear a Biohazard warning she made Right Guard call for backup. even the dogs won't smell her. an old blind geezer walking by asked her 'yo, how much for the shrimp platter?" that when she spread her legs, I got seasick... she wiz playin in my Sand Box and the cat came along and buried her. her poo is glad to escape. that standing next to a skunk, the Skunko smells sweet! that the only dis I'm gonna give her is Disinfectent... that when you was being born, the doctor's and nurses all had to wear oxygen masks... even sewer rats get outta her way... that farmers use her bathwater as liquid fertilizer... Yo Momma so Dirty she has to creep up on the bath water. that standin next to a tramp, she make the tramp look like a butler. that her house is so dirty I gotta wipe my feet before I go back outside. she lost 2 stone after taking a shower that even the Swamp Thing insisted she showered. that Saddam Hussain tried to import her bath water to use as chemical weapons.
yo mamma jokes cmpetition.

Yo mama so fat when she bungee jumps, she brings down the bridge too Yo mama so fat she fell in love and broke it. Yo mama so fat they use the elastic in her underwear for bungee jumping Yo mama so fat she left the house in high heels and when she came back she had on flip flops. Yo mama so stupid she sold her car for gasoline money! Yo mama so stupid she tripped over a cordless phone! Yo mama so old that when she was in school there was no history class. Yo mama so old her birth certificate says expired on it.
yo mamma jokes cmpetition.

yo mamma so short she goes skydiving of sidewalks yo mamma so poor when someone blew out a match she said 'hey, who turned off the heat?' yo mamma so ugly that she has a face only a mother could love, as long as that mother was dumb, blind and retarded. yo mamma so ugly she starred in a romance film but the film was classified as a horror movie. yo mamma so fat, when she ordered a water bed, the just put a blanket over the ocean.
yo mamma jokes cmpetition.

Yo mama so old that when God said let there be light, she hit the switch! Yo momma so ugly when she joined an ugly contest, they said "Sorry, No Professionals Yo momma so ugly they didn't give her a costume when she tried out for Star Wars. Yo momma so ugly they push her face into dough to make gorilla cookies. Yo Momma so short that she has to hold up a sign that says, "Dont Spit! I Cant Swim!" Yo mama teeth are so yellow, I can't believe its not butter
yo mamma jokes cmpetition.

Yo momma so dumb she hears it's chilly outside so she gets a bowl Yo momma so dumb she got locked in a grocery store and starved Yo momma so dumb she bought a solar-powered flashlight Yo momma so fat, when she went out side in a red dress, everyone yelled "HEY, KOOL-AID!" Yo momma so fat she went bungee jumping and went straight to hell!
Abortion.

We started this debate specifically because you were looking for someone who wouldn't forfeit, so that was hypocritical. Abortion should be legal in the first trimester so as to protect the rights of the mother. She has the right to her own body. There is no scientific proof that fetuses are human, while there is proof that women are human, so their rights must be a top priority. Anyway, I believe I have won this debate. I certainly deserve conduct points because of the forfeit. I also think that I was much more persuasive, because Con failed to address any of my last arguments. I believe my final rebuttal did a more than satisfactory job of refuting Con's final points.
Reunification of Korea

rebuttals 1. War Actually, war isn`t the only way. Kim Jong Un, And DPRK, can collaspe, or comprimise. China, an long-standing enemy of re-unification, decided to open up to ROSK. Russian agents belive re-unification in 20 years, in fact. Kim jong un, and president Bak guen hay, decided to open up more then the previous leaders. War is only one way korea can re-unite, but russia thinks collapse will be a more possible way. source: http://www.nytimes.com... source: http://www.spiegel.de... 2. Economy and reform education: North Korea and South Korea actually have very good education, and reform here isn`t needed. NK and SK both have 90-99% literacy rates, NK having 100%, education isn`t needed. Perhaps bias is a problem, but it doesn`t require a stimulus. millitary: My while argument says how the millitary will benefit. Goverment: A collasped goverment will mean not much here. Also, A comprimise, like socialism, can be made. Culture: This one, I agree will cost money, But isn`t impossible. Proposals are already being made in germany. I`m running out of time, sorry for a short argument.
Reunification of Korea

1. War We have to remember that North Korea is a communist country ruled by a dictator and South Korea is a capitalist country. Each side is contented with there government. North Korea is also threatening to attack South Korea and the world and South Korea hates Kim Jung-un. It is nearly impossible to try and unite these two countries without creating a war. North Korea has nuclear weapons, so if both countries go to war, expect nuclear warfare. 2. Economy and Reforms Whoever would win the war, South Korea's economy will go down because North Korea is a very poor country. Then there will be massive reforms on education, military, culture and government. We have to remember that these two countries are very different. So if reunification happens, a reform is inevitable. In conclusion, the reunification is nearly impossible to happen without war. If Reunification ever happens, then it will be costly.
Reunification of Korea

Thank you for accepting. I will argue that re-unification is best for both countries, north and south. The re-unification of the two countries offer many benefits. Please let me put together (no pun intended) The many benefits. 1. Millitary North Korea and South Korea compliment each other`s millitary completely, If the two combine. South Korea has a higher population, While North Korea has more in service. North Korea has More Aircraft, Ships, and Tanks, but lacks the Oil to fuel them. South Korea has oil. North Korea also has the higher Railway coverage, but lacks the Roadway coverage south Korea has. South Korea is a expert civilian use of cyberspace, Having the fastest Wifi in the world, While North Korea has the Millitary use of cyberspace, 6,000 cyber troops. Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com... Source: http://www.globalfirepower.com... 2) Resources North Korea has one of the most minerals in the world, with 200 types of resources. In a unified Korea, The technology from south Korea can be brought in, Giving many benefits and money to both Korea. South Korea can enjoy gold, iron, coal, and barite. North Korea on the other hand, Needs oil. South Korea has proven oil reserves. Clearly, If the two can ever unite, The Korean Mining industry can be one of the biggest in the world. resource: http://en.wikipedia.org... 3) Nature South Korea Isn`t best known for protecting Nature, and loses much from this. North Korea on the other hand, Has many Natural heavens. With A unified Korea, The drawbacks south Korea has because of pollution can be erased, And Cleaner water, Air, and land are all things Korea will be able to get. Tourism, Fresh Air, International support, less litter, and clean water are all things that are neutral interest, And the reunification balances the Clean nature in the North and the Industry of the south. source: http://experiencenorthkorea.com... 4) Banned goods. Currently, Koreans violate the rules to get fish from the North. A vendor reported “We have openly labeled shellfish that come from North Korea because customers think they taste better.” Without the ban on goods from each other, The fish Industry can be proped up in Korea. On the Other hand, The north Koreans may want the Wifi south Korea has. South Korea has the Fastest Wifi, And North Korea, who isn`t famous for using the Internet, May get some benefits. South Koreans get their fish, And North Koreans get the WIFI. Source: http://foreignpolicy.com... Source: http://testinternetspeed.org... 5) Less hostilities The two countries in war can have less skirmishes if they Unite, And focus on better things to do. 6) Preserve the DMZ Wildlife. If Korea can unite, The Border conflicts have no need, the DMZ can be used as a national Park. 300 Species of Fungus and 1,600 Vascular Plants thrive in the DMZ. After the Border is gone, The dmz can turn into a natural haven. The two Korea already cooperate in this part, The two formed a roosting area for the almost exclusively white and red-naped cranes. Furthermore, The DMZ can also be a historical park alongside natural one. http://www.theguardian.com...
Statutory rape laws need to be changed

Thanks for a great discussion! 1. Consent I agree that some youth are more mature than others. Yet, does this warrant a change in the SR laws? No, it does not. To establish the ability to grant consent on a case-by-case basis would consume juries' time and is incredibly subjective. That is why society has established set ages at which one can reasonably expect adequate consent to be possible. Of course, there are exceptions in the cases of the mentally ill, or when the victim is impaired by drugs or some other factor, but in general, societies within the U. S. have agreed on ages at which consent can reasonably be forthcoming. These laws may annoy those few teens that are capable of granting consent, but they protect far more teens who only think they're ready for sex. Therefore, SR laws should not be changes because they form a rule of utility that prevents many unready individuals from being victimized, despite a few exceptions. 2. Sexual Predation To base SR laws on situational factors is to make them incredibly vague. Laws cannot be changed on a case-by-case basis; they are only fair when applied equally for everyone. Moreover, Pro never directly addresses the problems with victims not identifying themselves as victims. If they won't self-identify as such, then, under Pro's proposal, the state could not take action to prevent them. So yes, they would be victims of cruel predation. Also, we're not talking about specific states--obviously California's law is ridiculous, but that does not mean that in most states, or that in the aggregate, SR laws need to be changed. One state is insufficient to affirm, because this topic is not specific to California. If the victim lies about their age AND the offender has no reasonable cause to believe that they are lying about their age, then the offender should not be prosecuted. Most states do have exceptions for this, so, in the aggregate, SR laws need not be changed. I thank you for a great discourse.
Statutory rape laws need to be changed

You bring up good points. I would like to bring up differences on the age of consent in each state. Once someone reaches the age of consent they can have sex with anyone older then them. The age of consent varies from age 16-18 depending on the state. In one state the age of consent is 18 so a 50 year old man having sex with a 16 year old, the 16 year old is "sexually exploited." Cross state lines where the age of consent is 16, the 16 year old is no longer sexually exploited. That just doesn't make sense. Now I will refute your arguments. 1. A lack of adequate consent Depending on the youth, some can sufficiently give consent. A teenager might possess enough social sense to make informed and mature decisions about sex, while some adults might never develop the ability to make mature choices about sex, as even many mentally healthy individuals remain naive and easily manipulated throughout their lives. 2. SR law is needed to prevent incest and sexual predation I didn't say we should abolish SR laws. I said we need to change SR laws. SR laws can be enforced based on the circumstances of the situation and not uniformly. It is true that sometimes they don't admit to feeling victimized, but that's not always the case. Also, many SR laws criminalize sexual activity between teens of the same age. In California, it is illegal for anyone to have sex with anyone under the age of 18. In other words, two 14 year olds can go to jail for having sex. Also, some teens look much older then they are and can easily lie about their age. Not all states have exceptions where the offender truly believed the victim was older. Watch this video. http://www.youtube.com... This 14 year old looks like she's 20. If she said she was 20 you would believe it. There are some underage people who can by cigarettes and many stores won't ask for their ID because they look older. It's not fair for someone to be punished when the truly believed the victim was of age. (See my other debates on adolescence). http://www.debate.org...
Statutory rape laws need to be changed

Hola. So, I'll construct my points in rebuttal to Pro's assertions. Pro makes the argument that statutory rape (SR) has far more to do with societal moral norms than it does with establishing real victimhood. This basic premise is wrong for two reasons: 1. A lack of adequate consent A young person is not fully able to give consent to sexual intercourse. Regardless of whether or not they feel victimized, they have to be able to give sufficient consent for the act to be considered legitimate. To do otherwise would be to allow others to take advantage of young people. The reasons we have laws protecting young people against sex is to ensure that they are make decisions in their best interests, but they can't. You wouldn't let a 13 year old sign documents to buy a house because they aren't responsible enough. The same goes for not letting the 13 year old have sex. 2. SR law is needed to prevent incest and sexual predation This sort of speaks for itself. Oftentimes victims of such acts feel as if they are pleasing the one raping them or they erect psychological walls preventing them from admitting to feeling victimized, and therefore don't self-identify as victims. But, just because one says one isn't a victim, doesn't make it true. They are being used, and that's wrong. SR laws may also serve as a deterrent against predators. I look forward to Pro's responses.
Rap Battle

I know I'm insane While i'm here spitting my brain Is going to Spain I'm flowing like rain But I'm showing no pain Or any empathy Don't be tempting me Or you're inclined to see The hate inside of me Explode like a p-lab I'm so dope I live inside of rehab Any date i might blow Like a crate of nitro I'm straight up psycho Off an ounce of Bacardi Then I'll bounce at your party While wearing a slain boar And Wielding a chainsaw Like leather face chasing you So go and brace your crew Cos once I've made this brew I'm going to take your shoe