The United States does not need any more laws. We need to abolish laws that aren't necessary.

"Laws that clarify are few and far between. The government often does a really good job of making things confusing and costly and rarely can it ever create comprehensive and simple ideas that work. I would know, I've been working for Uncle Sam for the past five years." Theres a MASSIVE difference between being a soldier and being a lawyer, and that isnt any evidence to suggest that the government rarely creates comprehensive and simple ideas that work.... We don't need more laws full of legal mumbo-jumbo that most people would need a lawyer to understand. We need fewer,simpler laws that anybody can work for everybody. We shouldnt dumb down the language in bills just so that every idiot from Florida to Alaska can have a clue in understanding what they mean. Laws are enacted to change society in a legal and organized matter, not so that people can have some good reading material. Bills like SOPA, PIPA, CISPA should never even be given the chance in Washington, but instead if we don't fight them, they most definitely will be signed into effect. There are idiotic bills introduced to Congress every week that never get the chance to be voted on. Bills calling for Obamas impeachment, withdrawing from the UN, withdrawing from NAFTA, declaring war on Saudi Arabia, etc that have all been introduced and killed quickly.... The people dont have to fight every bill where if we dont they get passed, Congress already eliminates a surprising number of stupid bills on its own where only a few of them slip through the cracks. Laws are passed without the American public knowing anything about it. Theres a difference between not knowing about it and not caring about it.... And its usually the latter oneThe NDAA was signed on new years eve so that there wouldn't be as much uproar from the public mostly because the act allows the government to indefinitely detain anybody it labels as being affiliated with a 'terrorist' group without a trial or jury! 1) The claim that he signed it on New Years to avoid public uproar is pure speculation2) This if anything sounds like a damn good reason for the government to keep making laws, so that they can fix the screw-ups found in earlier laws! Just the other day for example, The Monsanto Protection Act was PASSED while everybody was debating over whether or not the government should let gay people marry each other. Ok 1) Its called the Farmer Assurance Provision not the Monsanto Protection Act...2) All the bill does state that lower courts should not automatically prohibit the planting of biotech crop varieties, or the harvest and sale of biotech crops already planted, when their commercial approval is revoked for procedural reasons. Emphasis on should instead of cant and procedural instead of health If you aren't going to provide an intelligent debate why are you even on here?Me? Im still waiting for you to give a half-rational argument on why the US doesnt need any more laws.... So far the best evidence youve used is that 'theyre too hard to read' which is a really stupid a** reason to not have any more of them... Im also still waiting for you to respond to why we we shouldnt make new laws to sort out stuff like drones, marijuana, gay marriage, abortion, taxes, etc....