School Prayer

I see much misinterpretation with some of your arguments. Let us see my last argument! I am also delighted to see you being such a challenge for my first debate, and congratulate your respect. Now on to more pressing matters. ******************************************************************************************************* #1 I understand; we should be discussing school prayer and not debating over the "under God" statement. Originally is was used to prove the point that in that sense allowing school prayer is similar. As a conclusion, school prayer is just as unconstitutional. Take a look at this statement from a certain website cited below. "The Knights of Columbus " a Catholic men"s group " led the lobbying effort to add "under God." Now the Pledge is twisted, with divisive religious language that implies true patriots must be believers. With "under God" added, the Pledge is not a statement of patriotism. Instead, extremist preachers and politicians point to the language to validate their view that those who don"t believe in God don"t belong." People had to meddle with the law to get what they want. Anyways that is not the main point here. In its same respect, allowing school prayer is unconstitutional. ******************************************************************************************************* #2 I never changed my argument. I was pointing out that the population should come to a consensus in respecting each others beliefs without anyone overly favoring one view than the other in which is removing any favor of a religious institution such as school prayer. ******************************************************************************************************* #3 I never admitted defeat. Should I give false statement and faulty evidence to prove a point? No, which is why I agreed with a certain statement, but I also did not say that school prayer should be allowed because that will be favoring a religious institution regardless of what the founders' beliefs were. Even one of the old rulers of the U.S said that the future does not belong to the dead. At this moment, it seems that allowing school prayers would allow for some radical bigots to use it as a source of justice for being like that "because the majority is Christian". ****************************************************************************************************** #4 Usually people feel good without even knowing why and usually it is for what society considers "good", or maybe even something else instead of listening to other people. Also , most people are born with morality in the first place with the added fact that being pleasing to your morality usually gives a good pleasure which is in fact the release of dopamine. So whether or not kids believe in God(a god, or gods), they have their own respective views in which they do not need the government allowing school prayer to drive them to doubt what they should believe in. ******************************************************************************************************* #5 The majority and minority should have their say be just as effective. In the early days of the nation they established freedom of religion because the minority was being oppressed in the west. It did not matter if many people said that "we should kill non-believers" because that violated many rights and in its own sense it is just wrong in which school prayer might be allowing a gateway to keep pressuring bigotry in this nation. ******************************************************************************************************* Sources -http://www.dontsaythepledge.com... ******************************************************************************************************* Having a non school prayer zone will be respecting everyone's views creating a tolerant and harmonic society. P.S. You have some misspellings in your arguments, but all is good.