Right and wrong is perception

1. MoralityFirst off, you don't have to believe in God in order for him to exist. Am I suggesting that Atheists are wrong for not believing in God? Yes. Am I forcing them to believe? No, but that doesn't mean that God doesn't exist. There is, strong evidence pointing towards his existence (and I'm not talking about myths found in the bible), but this is an argument for another day. My point is, you don't have to believe in God for him to exist. He can and does exist. Something cannot come from nothing. And the majority of humans on this earth believe he does. That being said, God has given us a set of rules to live a good life, and whether or not some people believe in them or not, doesn't matter. Common sense suggests them to be true. Even Atheists can't argue against the Ten commandments (with the exception for the keeping God's day holy, and not taking his name in vain, etc). You cannot argue that murder, rape and thievery are morally just. You simply cannot. Many things in this world are debatable, but morals are not one of them. There is no just argument justifying murder, rape, and theft. You may argue, that of course there is. People don't have to believe in everything you believe. That is true. But it doesn't make them right. There are simply things that cannot be argued logically. These are just a few of them. 2. "If god created an absolute right and wrong for everything then why do we have the free will to decide what we believe?" Yes, God gave us free will to do as we please. That doesn't mean that it is right for us to kill, just because we can. Our world as we know it couldn't exist without free will, so God gave it to us. But he also told us how to live our life without doing wrong. Whether or not we choose to do so is totally up to us. We are never forced to do harm, we choose to do so. So, yes, God did give us absolute wrong, and absolute right. Whether or not we choose to see it is up to us. But that doesn't change the fact of whether murder, rape, and theft are right or wrong. Our opinion may be that it is right to do either, when that is far from the truth.3. Reasons Morality is indisputable 3.1 "Murder is wrong according to whom?"Murder is wrong according to logic. According to common sense. It takes away that person's right to life, their right to choose what to do with their life. Anyone arguing otherwise is should provide good reasoning as to why murder is ok. Life is precious. You get one chance at it, and it is indisputably wrong to take away that of another person. 3.2 Definition of [1]"murder"-"The crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought". There is no malice intended when you're killing someone to defend yourself. And as for the death penalty, once again, we are talking about people's opinions on whether it is ok to kill a criminal. It doesn't change the definition of murder, meaning that whether or not people agree that it is morally permissible to kill a criminal, it is most definitely not morally permissible to murder someone. You might argue that this is contradictory, but no, it isn't. Definition of [2]"kill"-"To put an end to ". So there is a difference between killing and murdering. Murdering is unjustifiably depriving someone of their right to life. And while killing is depriving someone of their life, if you did it in self defense, with no malice involved, then it is not murder. 3.3 Definition of [3]"rape"-"Unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against the will usually of a female or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent." Under the definition of rape, it is rape unless the victim agrees to carry out sexual activities. Basically, if she says yes, it's consensual sex, if she doesn't agree to it, it is rape, or at least sexual assault. So no, it cannot be debated as to whether rape is moral or otherwise. It is obviously immoral.4. Are humans naturally good?Yes, humans are naturally good. They most certainly aren't naturally evil. While they are naturally selfish, this doesn't mean they aren't good. Just because some people are bad, doesn't mean they were naturally bad. The reason they are bad is because they were raised that way. How can you prove humans are naturally good? You cannot scientifically prove it, but you cannot prove otherwise, either. However, why are the majority of people good people? Even Atheists tend to follow the ten commandments (with exceptions made earlier in the argument). This is because humans are naturally good, and so they teach their children to do so. It is impossible to argue otherwise.5. Opinion vs MoralityYes, the perception of right and wrong can be subjective. But morality cannot be subjective. Like I said earlier, you can have different opinions with different people on sports, music, politics and much more, but that doesn't make either right or wrong. But as for morals, it isn't possible to argue the morality of murder, thievery or rape. I defy anyone to argue otherwise. So yes, some things are subject to different opinions, but there are things that aren't. Morality is one of them.Conclusion I have shown why, logically, morality is constant, and cannot be argued, whether or not a certain individual agrees with it or not. Trying to argue that murder is wrong is like trying to argue that 2+2=5. It cannot be done. [1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...[2] http://www.merriam-webster.com...