In a fight to death, between Logical-Master & Yraelz, Logical-Master would likely emerge victorious.

I'm afraid I must forfeit round 4. Although I have easily bested my opponent with my clear powers, I have lost this debate...I would like to point out that my opponent has confirmed himself as a humble law student through his cloning experiment. Only a law student would have a ninja bodygaurd and be able to clone that bodygaurd. Nothing suggests that Logical-Master is a trained assasin or anything more than an average law student. Undoubtedly he has won this debate. Additionally his arguments about my omnipotence are dead true. I could not have used WIFOM to win the mafia games and simultaneously win this debate: Thus I would not like to post this addendum to my argument:===================================================================Addendum: ontention 1:Yraelz contends that because I was victorious in my UTW debate with him, I would choose one of my UTW characters in an actual "anime battle", hence I'd be victorious in an anime battle. However, members of debate dot org, if you would take a gander at the link he has provided you, you'll learn firsthand that not ONE of my characters were anime characters [1]. Rather, they were Western Animation and video game characters. As such, Yraelz's argument holds no merit. Even if it did, there's also the act that the UTW debate's were hindered by rules/limitations.There, time travel was against the rules. As one can see, I won that debate due to Yraelz's devious efforts to break the rules by moving one second ahead of the normal line. Since no such rules hinder our anime battle, Yraelz would always have a one-second advantage and thus would be able to best me with ease.Finally, as an anime, Yraelz would win without effort. As one can see from his profile, he's a fan of Bleach [2]. Thus, as a Bleach's man character, he'd have no problem slicing me to pieces. Take a look at this video and notice how quickly the main character moves [3]. Even if I were a ninja, I could NEVER keep up with that!Contention 2:Yraelz resents us with pascal's wager like scenario by addressing while two possibilities require a vote in his favorPossibility #1: Yraelz the Omnipotent House Cat!As suspected, Yraelz threatens you with what he may or may not do should you vote against him at the end of this debate. It's quite possible that our omnipotent house cat may do just that. In light of this threat however, I'm reminded of our one true advantage. TIf there's one thing that can harm Yraelz, it's . . . boredom. Indeed,boredom is why he toys with his prey. Boredom is why he indulges with us mortals. Boredoms is why he debates and plays mafia. Members of debate.org, Yraelz seeks to relieve his boredom. Should he annihilate all of us, he will be bored for all of eternity. Should you all be alive at the end of this debate, that'll will serve as PROOF of this observation. In other words, should you live to see the end of this debate, that's justfication enough to vote CON. Voting CON is the only means of standing up to Yraelz without a guarenteed smiting!Possibility #2: Logical-Ninja MasterIf I truly am a ninja intent on doing the possible and ending the life an omnipotent hosue cat, why have I left evidence behind? A ninja is silent and leaves no evidence of his existence. What kind of ninja acts out in the open? If I truly am a ninja, I'm a lousy one at that and Yraelz assured victory as a result.Possbility #3: Kleptin-san is the true ninjaAs the evidence shows, my loyal ward Kleptin is the ninja Yraelz spoke of. Fortunately,as a result of cloning experiment, I have brought him back to life, as one can see from his recent activity[4]. Thus, as a result of these recent findings, if Yraelz is somehow not an omnipotent house cat and just a mafia assassin, neither of us will die at the end of the debate thanks to my bodyguard's constant dedication. Therefore, should I survive by the end of this debate, you should vote CON as it will confirm that no one emerged victorious in what both of us have agreed to being a fight to the death.Contention 3:Yraelz provides us with an explanation of WIFOM. However, one should examine the Princess Bride closely. If you'll listen to Vizinni's explanation, he actually go the right answer. He said "you could have put the poison in your own goblettrusting on your strength to save you." Westley (the guy with the zorro like mask) did exactly that. Yraelz has simply demonstrated that if one thinks hard enough, they can provide the right the conclusion. Had Vizinni not given up, he could have won the battle of wits by assessing the possibiliies he had already provided (one of them being correct). Members of debate dot org, Yraelz is simply trying to confuse you, much like Wesley confused Vizinni in the Princess. The obvious answer is right in front of you.Yrael tells that no cat like demi-god would voluntarily lose a mafia game. However, since Yraelz is an omnipotent house cat, that means he's omniscient as well, meanine knew about this debate well in advance, thus knew how to counter my arguments ahead of time. He purposely lost that game so that he could win this debate. Sometimes, losing the battleis necessary to win the war.Lastly, even if I were to steal Yraelz's eyelashes, he coud use his eyelashes remotely (akin to a remote WOMD) to incinerate me whie I was filled with a false of security!Great justice demands that Yraelz be stopped![1] http://en.wikipedia.org......[2] http://www.debate.org......[3] https://www.youtube.com......[4] http://www.debate.org......