Smoking Should be Banned

The non-smoker must move because there is absolutely no legal reason that the smoker has to move, therefore if he is not comfortable with the conditions of his environment then he must decide for himself weather to remedy the situation or not. I would also like to state that it is not the governments job to decide what any person does for a living. And furthermore it is not fair to assume that people don't want these jobs as my opponent stated. That is a opinion and not a fact some people do want those jobs. and The government should not be allowed to tell them no. As for the point about family's in third world countries. where that is their only job. These are not countries where a family has an option to walk down the street and file for unemployment or go to school. these are countries where the government rules with a fist. and if they lost their job they would lose everything. It is sad but it is true. I would hope my opponent can realize that there are bad places like this in the world and by taking away the one source of income it would lead to many deaths of innocent family's. as for the argument that it would cause a black market effect. I would like to point out that there is a market for everything that is not legal. Weather it be human trafficking, sex slaves, drugs, or any other countless thing that is outlawed. It is still available to those who seek it. And I I believe that banning smoking would lead to an increase in violence and create problems throughout the rest of our government such as tieing up court systems to increased taxes on everyone to pay for more protection from law enforcement. As for the fact of my opponent contradicting himself I would like to say that I give him the benefit of the doubt that he does not understand that the two statements I quoted him saying directly contradict one another. I have shown him how and why that was a contradiction and have explained that to the best of my ability. As for regulating this industry I agree that it has failed before however that does not mean it wont work. As for my opponents argument that a hard working mother should not be allowed to smoke at home. I would like to point out two things. 1. my opponent has compared smoking around a child to pouring alcohol in the child's bottle. One of those things is highly ill-leagel and the mother would get arrested for child endangerment, smoking around the child is not ill-leagel and while it can be harmful it is ultimately the mothers decision to do so or not. I would also like to point out that there is no plausible way for the government to keep tabs on everyone in America to make sure they are not smoking around children. It is absurd and just cannot happen. Summary of main arguments. and points proved. 1. .. the banning of smoking would cause economics around the world to crumble and lead to death and devastation. 2. .. adult smokers and adult second hand smokers have a choice. 3. .. In many third world countries this is a family's only source of income and may die without these jobs. 4. .. the banning of smoking would create domestic problems with court systems, law enforcement, hospitals, and black markets. 5. .. smoking does have some positive side effects as proved by my opponents own reference site.