God created the earth

I'm happy to have the opportunity to debate this. "The theory of evolution, states that life can only come from life."I would like to see Pro's proof that the theory of evolution states that only life can come from life. Obviously life started somewhere. I will now explain the origin of the evolutionary process. The five steps I will present come from [1], which has pictures in case that will be easier for anybody to wrap their head around. I will attempt to explain this a little more simply than Berkeley does. Also, I will not explain how certain things work, like RNA/DNA having genetic information because somebody that is able to claim that "the proof that backs evolution is horrible" must know a lot about it.1) Simple organic molecules were formed.Simple organic molecules known as nucleotides formed. Nucleotides are composed of carbon atoms, hydrogen atoms, nitrogen atoms, oxygen atoms, and phosphorus atoms. These nucleotides are not life. They are simply organic molecules that will serve as the building block of life. Experiments suggest that these molecules may have been synthesized in the atmosphere, and then would have rained down onto the ground and water. DNA/RNA, genetic materials for all life, are just long chains of nucleotides. 2) Replicating molecules evolved and began to undergo natural selection.The act of reproduction most likely began in the form of an RNA self-replicator. The RNA would make copies of itself. After copying itself, the RNA would form chains of nucleotides. This is where natural selection comes in. The nucleotides that did not replicate as well, and were not able to replicate as quickly, became less and less common compared to the ones that successfully replicated. This would go on until-by complete accident-a better kind of replication could take place, and then that one would take over as the more common one. This went on until a stable/efficient replicating system eventually evolved.3) Replicating molecules became enclosed within a cell membrane."The evolution of a membrane surrounding the genetic material provided two huge advantages: the products of the genetic material could be kept close by and the internal environment of this proto-cell could be different than the external environment." The molecules that were protected by the membrane obviously out-competed their membrane-less counterparts. This membrane advancement resulted in what our current bacterium use. 4) Some cells began to evolve modern metabolic processes and out-competed those with older forms of metabolism.I'm not smart enough to break this down so here's what Berkeley says about step four. "Up until this point, life had probably relied on RNA for most jobs. But everything changed when some cell or group of cells evolved to use different types of molecules for different functions: DNA (which is more stable than RNA) became the genetic material, proteins (which are often more efficient promoters of chemical reactions than RNA) became responsible for basic metabolic reactions in the cell, and RNA was demoted to the role of messenger, carrying information from the DNA to protein-building centers in the cell. Cells incorporating these innovations would have easily out-competed 'old-fashioned' cells with RNA-based metabolisms, hailing the end of the RNA world."5) Multicellularity evolved.Potentially as early as 2 billion years ago, some cells stopped going their separate ways after replicating, and began to have specialized functions. This created the world's first multicelular organisms. Over billions of years, natural selection made each organism more and more complex, while becoming better and better at surviving. Fast forward 2 billion years and here we are. Coexisting with life forms that evolved differently than we did. Every living thing can trace it's family history back billions of years. I think that's pretty awesome.[1] http://evolution.berkeley.edu...