Who is the actual (FLESH!) Root of David. I say Adam started the line of David.

I beg to differ with my opponent use or claim's that the Root of David is not the first actual flesh man who had children, beginning David's bloodline. Like a actual tree begins at the Root, And if Jesus say's He is the Root of David meaning the Alpha of the Bible. The man who was with God and was God. See John 1;1. So by changing what God said into false traditions of man is saying, You are saying that you do, know more than Jesus. Nor did my opponent give a solid answer for Rev.22;16 where Christ claims to be the Root and Offspring of David. Yet my opponent clearly said the Root of David is always spiritual and never means a flesh man. And not virgin born Christ in the flesh. I appeal to the those who have God given common sense. The Root of David is Adam the first man listed in David's family line. Not what false religions teach their blind pew potato's. Who are serving Antichrist. 1Jo_2:18, Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. 1Jo_2:22, Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1Jo_4:3, And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 2Jo_1:7, For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. My opponent denies that The Root of David came in the flesh! Notice my opponent refers to one verse of scripture then like the scribes of old just babbles along right off the top of their own head. Strongs# 3335 - formed means squeezed into, the potter I appeal to the reader to look-up or Google this word formed and see that my witness is true. When did God form Himself? Gen.2;5-7 the man to til the ground, and common sense say's that means to make plants grow. Can man make plants grow without the weather? No! " Isa 43:10 Ye are my witnesses saith the LORD and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed neither shall there be after me. " Is Isaiah wrong too? My opponent babbles more about the outwardly Jew's???? Another bible fact is the Jews came from the sperm of Adam. His=God's people. The gentiles did not come out of Adam, Because those people were already here. Created in Gen.1;26. Next I appeal to the common sense of the reader, Host=People. Gen_2:1, Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. No Adam yet. " Gen 2:11 The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah where there is gold; Gen 2:12 And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone. Gen 2:13 And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. Gen 2:14 And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates. " Notice the gold, (Not of cows.) Notice the pearls, (Not for pigs.) Notice the named nation of Assyria no Arabs. Did God forget the people of Assyria? Notice the named nation of Ethiopia. Did some of Adam's children turn into black people, and others turn brown? Where did red ruddy white people come from? Adam (Strongs#119) means red ruddy. Create the land of Havilah outside of Eden because God set a trap for Adam and Eve. I would like my opponents to explain his religious based argument. And will be the first to agree that what you are saying is taught by the religious right. Who is 99.9% wrong about what is written in the bible. I will close this round by pointing out that my opponent said that Christ and David did not share the same bloodline. Claiming again to offer personal wrong opinion denying the bible text. Because a very careful bloodline record called a genealogy listed naming the men in Adam's family from umbilical cord to umbilical cord. Proof all men do not share the bloodline of Adam. Next I guess my opponent will say that a genealogy is not a birth record but something spiritual, in attempt to fix his false religion who taught him this misinformation posted in this debate. 2Ti_2:16, But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. Tit_1:10, For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Tit_3:9, But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.