Re re-upload: God cannot be morally good while giving humans free will

Sorry about that. I am speaking about the Abrahamic God (Judaism, Christianity and Islam). If you want to speak about other Gods then okay. The reason why I choose this God is because It is all-knowing. This important in my premise which I should have made clear that if God knows that the person's life would be more negative then positive as whole and still allowed that person to live God is partly to blame. The reason is God had the power to do something but did not. You might say how do we know when someone does more harm then good in their life? I would say Hitler did not get his just punishment for one of the worst people to live. You might say in the afterlife but that is not anything to work with in this life so in this reality he did not recieve a just punishment. I do not believe your argument is valid because I do not believe that God is bound by the morality he set for human beings. I am basing on what the Abrahamic religion has given titles to their God. I am not saying God is bound by our morality. I am stating from my perception with the power God has God is evil. The reason is It has the power do something and does not. You can bring up that their God is Just and Merciful. To me you cannot be both, Either you are one or the other. Just requires to do what is morally right and being merciful does come in the way of that. Either God is a pushover or delivers fair moral authority. I would say It is a pushover simply based on what It does not do. This is because God is our creator. He imposes the rules upon his creation, And his creation must follow accordingly; by no means, However, Is he required to do the same. What if the text It used cannot be verified with our current tools? Shouldn't It's job be to update the religious book of his choice to make sure It's will is being carried out. All 3 of them do not hold up to scrutiny but are based on belief. My argument would be if you base everything on belief then it is not difficult to say everything was created by God. Reason helps us understand in an objective what happened or occurred. To put this in another light, When we create things, We tend to also impose our own rules upon our creation; programmers will write programs with a long list of instructions, Scientists will conduct experiments with a detailed set of steps. Even when creating an imaginary world, An author or illustrator will adhere to whatever imaginary laws and standards exist in said world when telling its story. At no point, However, Are these creators required to follow these same rules that they impose upon their world. The example you have given would be that humans would still be alive for the experiments right? I think a better analogy would be if scientist have found a way to make robots sentient. They would be more efficient in doing the correct thing if programmed correctly so why wouldn't we abide by their morals since they are working like us but at a faster rate. From my point of view God has not been clear with what It wants and expects us to follow a religious documents that do not hold up to our standards of science. Yes who are we to ask God to based on our morality but how are we meant to comprehend if not with our sense of morality? Just take it upon belief I am guessing that God is right. I believe that God exists in a dimension of existence that is on such a higher order of magnitude than ours that to even attempt to understand what morality he abides by--if even at all--would be futile. My question would be if we cannot comprehend what It wants then how are we supposed to fulfill his wishes? I did base it on the Abrahamic God but even that the 3 religions do not agree on the same one. Am I supposed to believe this one over the other based on belief? I am sure if I believe all these religions on belief then they would all be right (comparing alternative realities where I was born and believed in Christianity, Jeudaism, Islam) but that cannot be if they all claim to be the one true telling of God. 2. I believe that your second premise is invalid. God has no need to do what is 'right' because our notion of 'right' does not even apply to him. Therefore, Our human perceptions of 'morally good' are inapplicable to God. If we cannot comprehend him why do we choose to believe him? One point I would like to add to this discussion: God can still be God without being morally good. Even with the Abrahamic God, God in their instance is illogical. Meaning God can do bad and still be perceived good by us because it is based on belief. I would like you to answer why is God morally good or objectively morally good? If you say something similar to It is God then I would say this is a might makes right argument. That does not make God right but the most powerful so we must abide by him. Now if you want to speak about God in General state it in your Round 2. Make sure to define God so that I know the God you are speaking about. May we still learn something new