The decision to not indict Officer Darren Wilson was justifiably correct

"What use are police officers if boys, not men, boys," Please don't twist definitions of boys and men. Legally Michael Brown was 18 years old when he was shot. The guy just recently graduated from college, he has had 18 years of deciphering what is right and wrong. Also, a boy is "a male child or youth." thus i believe that Michael doesn't fit this description. "You're also kind of putting a lot of faith into the testimony of Darren Wilson, kind of the man that would benefit from getting off with this." I'm not blindly putting faith in Darren Wilson's testimony. Like I said before, his testimony gains some credibility due to the forensic oexamination of the corpse crresponding with Wilson's given testimony at the time. (the hand tucked in the waistband) "So... Brown was called out to stop the robbery conducted... by Brown? And then Brown shot himself? I think you mean Wilson, but even that doesn't hold up, " I was not stating that the robbery had connection of the murder. The purpose of that statement was to justify that Wilson did not plan to murder Brown. "heavy set 18 year old that didn't participate in sports" I know this is a bit persistent, but please provide sources to prove he did not participate in sports. "2) a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life." Their are no psychology tests that show that Darren Wilson was not of sound mind when committing the crime so he did have some concern for human life because he did not fire the shots immediately, he fired the shots after he was assaulted. Also, Wilson was not dangerously acting as Wilson was physically assaulted before he fired shots (1) ended up with some physical injuries, "35 feet, buckaroo, to run away." 10 meters away is considered sprint-able distance for most people. Thus it is perfectly reasonable to shoot in reflex when someone is charging towards you. (1) "seemingly channelling the devil spirits that run through his body, " I don't think anybody was saying that. "placed his hand in his jeans because he's just so much better at running like that. " Evidence shows he had marijuana in his system when the event happened. Thus, Michael was not of sound mind when deciding to charge at Wilson. (2) " Oh, and I did that little exercise, and I am pretty sure the bullet would have entered my stomach if I was shot in the arm like that. " that wasn't the point of the excercise, the point of the excercise was to prove that Michael could not have put his hands up in surrender. That would mean that he would expose the fleshier bit of his arm, and if that was the case, the fleshier part of his arm would have been shot, not the other half. Also, because shots entered the nonfleshier half of the arm, it corresponds to the forensic evidence and Wilson's testimony with the hand tucked in the waistband. "Kneeling, with your arms up?" Ditto argument above "unarmed teenager is shot 30 feet away" Like i've said, Michael did charge at Wilson and at the end Wilson shot him. Perhaps a deductible outcome was as Michael was charging at Wilson, He got close enough that Wilson shot many times out of reflex, thus making it seem he was shot 35 feet but in fact he was closer when the shots were fired and Michael was propelled back because of the shots. "2) when all other means have been exhausted. TAZER, ANYBODY?????" Whether police officers carry batons or guns, it is up to the individual to bring what they think is necessary with them, the fact that Darren went out of the office with a gun is not relevant to proving that he should be indicted. (1) http://www.frontpagemag.com... (2) http://reason.com...