All women should be given free large breast enhancements by the government

List of Dropped ArgumentsThe following arguments were dropped by Imabench. NB that I have not dropped ANY arguments in this debate, even though my opponent made an abusively-large number of arguments in round two. This includes points Imabench claimed I dropped - voters can check this for themselves. For instance, my Jennifer Lopez counter-argument had NOTHING to do with my model, yet Imabench did not answer it. Other points I directly related to my counter-model, and yet Imabench answered them.My argumentsWomen already hotYoung people lying about ageLess experienced girlsBoys raping mothersBoys raping grandmothersLess rape of underage girlsApocalypse+ My so-called "Extra Argument"My modelMore arousingLess gaysHealthier kids in nightclubsSexier hamburger eatingCrossdressing OKFatness OKHotter guysMore sexual experimentationNZ could laugh at America (this is the most important argument in the whole debate)All girls like hot lesbiansHis modelHotness scaleCPR funPost-CPR sexCrowded elevatorsHis sixth point, which elaborated on his firstCurve-fitting attireIllegalsTV reporters hotterMusic videos hotterBeach funnerProm dates hotterTV joggingHotter neighboursPillow boobsWet T-shirt contestsHotter game showsLDF vs KonyJennifer LopezMoviesFemale OccupationsSo ... what's left?The following, much smaller list, is all the arguments that were not dropped by Imabench. If you're one of those voters who votes on the balance of evidence, then surely the relative size of these lists must count for something.NZ women would look bad - My opponent begins by saying only American blond women are stupid and idiotic. Believe it or not, we have blond women in New Zealand too and we still have a higher average IQ than you, so you can't just put it down to the color of your hair. Next he claims that our women are so ugly that they have bigger problems to worry about. Again this is a ridiclious assertion - American women are equally ugly under the status quo. See my point about there being no problem to fix. My opponent continues by saying that his military will try to invade us to get revenge for all the big-breasted women our girls assasinated. In all likelihood, since we are so small, your big bombs will miss and hit Australia, causing us to cheer and rejoice. In the unlikely event that one of the bombs falls into our territory, since most of our territory is sea, you're likely to not cause any damage to us at all, but rather anger Poseidon, who will send Percy Jackson to destroy your armies with his superpowered demigod friends. In the EXTREMELY unlikely event that a bomb does actually hit land, it has a 96% chance of hitting a sheep. It has a further 3.9% chance of hitting an empty field or national park. It has a further 0.09% chance of hitting somewhere nobody cares about, such as Otago University. In the extremely unlikely event that something of value is hit, then you'll also hit the ropes that Maui used to slow the sun, and as a result you won't get any rest ever again.15y/o sex - my opponent's argument is purely emotional and ignorant of when puberty starts. Furthermore it misrepresents my sexual beliefs - I think AMERICAN men should have sex with 15-year-olds while having massive breasts - preferably while I stand nearby with a super-hot college car washer laughing my head off.Too much masterbation - my opponent does not refute that masterbation takes people's minds off things, which has a negative social effect. He disputes my semen-tsunami-hypothesis (STH) as a matter of fact, however, claiming his will last 60 more minutes (a very representative amount, by the way - meaning the STH is only about 2 hours away if true) and that it can be rectified by swallowing the semen. That would be forcing the women to enagage in sexual activity - how mysogynistic! How anti-civil rights! Women are now smart enough to know that they're not actually slaves. Perhaps this model may have worked back in Victorian times but it surely won't work today!Less awkwardness/sexual insecurity - The whole POINT is to make guys feel a bit uncomfortable so that they get USED to feeling uncomfortable. This a) makes sex slightly better, because they'd feel relatively comfortable, and b) like I've said in previous rounds, Fat guys not people - I fail to see how this is a contradiction. Since my opponent did not explain it, I will ignore it.Respect male natural over female un-natural breasts - This argument is unfair because, being non-gay, I'm ambivalent towards breasts of the same gender. I don't think it's being a weirdo to think that for girls like Denise Milani, who again, is representative of ALL women, to be given breast enhancements kind-of defeats the awesomeness of their natural breast size. I'm quite satisfied with that amount of breast under the status quo.Women always want to work the pole - again, this is factually incorrect. They do it to earn money, which they can only do if they're above-average in terms of hotness. With all women having the same breasts, and men always looking at the breasts, all women will look the same under my opponent's model. Why would Russian girls want to look like American girls? It defeats the purpose of being a Russian girl.People willingly go to South Beach - but it's OK there because everyone's drunk.You can buy computers and practice karate anywhere in the US that is south of Colorado - but Asia does it cheaper. The US just can't compete with Asian economies of scale.People like to go to places to see hot women all the time - only before they get married, and non-married people usually have less disposable income as they're quite young.My mother not a valid stalker - Why not?Whats wrong with letting women go au naturale - that you won't get bra shopping, which you listed as an advantage. It clearly won't happen if women don't wear bras.Dimishing returns - My opponent's analogy is premised on some girls having bigger boobs than others - this won't happen if you make all breasts the same size.Half a brain = more trolling - actually it means half a troll. Trolling takes extraordinary amounts of creativity, effort and commitment, as I've found out in attempting to counter-troll you in this debate. All these things require a functional brain.Gomez vs Obama - it's not about "which one would I choose" - the boobs would be put to a different purpose on each. Both photos did not even include the chest so it's difficult to tell anyways. I suspect Gomez will already have boobs under the status quo so isn't in need of them, plus she's cute so I'd choose her anyway. I'd ALSO choose Obama for president if he had boobs. That kind of thing takes courage, dedication and leadership, just like America needs.Only one gender drives cars in Saudi Arabia - this debate is set in America, not Saudi Arabia. I know they sound similar but the difference is pretty important to grasp.ConclusionAs you can see, my opponent has completely failed to defend his model. My counter-model remains 100% unrefuted. Pro has failed their BOP. The resolution is negated.