Creationism(P) vs (C)Popular Non-theist Theory of Creation

My opponent has provided the argument of Doubt against me. His argument in turn, was an argument of Benefit of the Doubt. When the Model of Creation was provided, which is the most effective arsenal against contradicting theories, It was present in a scientifically accurate manner. The transitions between Mornings, and Evenings, were in fact perfect interpretations of what would have taken place given the scenario which we are observing. It is not theoretical to determine that from the Pre-creation (before the first day) Planet, each proceeding event which happened in the creation account is Scientifically Proven to have be the only valid Facts regarding the circumstances. Because, Each event taking place in this scenario is scientifically accurate, concerning which events must therefor take place in order for a change to occur leading to - not a planet, but a universe - like ours. So I will rephrase the facts. IN the beginning, if the Universe was consumed with Darkness and yet matter was present: { because light exists we must determine an origin. as a preliminary requirement } ( Light is persists in all forms of energy; thermal, electrical, organic, radiation, heat.) The condition that would cause Light to arise int he darkness where Matter exists would be a perfect condition. A setting for which is would become the Law of Physics, The Truth/Wisdom, which determines this setting must at the point of the event, be that point of Origin for the elapsing change. Therefor, When the Focus of God, the spirit and movement, Who is entirety of the Cosmos; and is also unified as a whole - When this focus was upon the surface of Earth, we have it in the Model, Energy broke free from the darkness, for the first time. This is a very Logical, well reasoned and plausible approach to the origin of Light regardless of any preceeding or proceeding Model, however we have one. Now that Light had been established on the Surface of the perfect condition, it must be determined (when examining a Model accused of being Theoretical) this change would progress. Because Light was the Change in the condition, it was considered a 'More' element, and when there was then in this condition of change no More sporadically change associated with the cause of the event, an 'Evening' to place. So we determined by science, that Energy always clings to something, and as it always takes the path of least resistance, we can determine why on the Second Morning the event was predictable for a Model of Creation. The Matter of the Earth, was described to be arranged in this manner, "An Ocean (water and liquids and gases all consisting of gaseous elements, the least dense elements) Enveloping the world which was set at it's depths ( where the dense matter had accumulated, this matter including salts. )" And so, the Planet on the first page of the Bible was determined to be arranged least dense to denser matters as it suspended in space. So, the Second Morning. We have determined that in this Model, The Energies persisting in Light were not present as observed and studied until the first day, as a Model, and we are following the scientifically accurate course of events which would unfold. The Energy, taking the path of least resistance, would also cling to something, and immediately it would Molecularize all the least dense matter. This is not hypothesis, this is what would occur; The sky would immediately become a canopy of molecularized, least dense matter. As the Ocean unfolds, (previously being wrapped tightly as a mass of matter without electrons gapping the spaces) It too is molecularized. This is scientifically accurate. The energy, yet unable to disperse into space would delve deeper into the ocean. It would not be Evening in this Model, until, the energy no longer altered or interacted with the outer layers of this entity. And so when the Sky and Large quantities of the Sea had become imbued with energy, it was an Evening. This is an accurate map of Creation: Darkness with matter - produces light - light creates molecules - Because the map has been previously illustrated and you have access to all sources concerning the perusing events and the mechanics of energy, Please consider the third day of Creation on your own, and determine if the Map of Creation is an accurate Model of the next events which would occur when considering the originating statement. Because the Model of Creation is in fact Scientifically accurate considering the transition stages of Creation, it can be determined that this was not of a Human origin or any Alien ( for the map dispels such suggestions when continually followed thoroughly outwards from our Galaxy). I have in fact fully elaborated on the Model in Round two: However it appears my opponents, those who suggest I have not provided evidence, have not thoroughly read either of my arguments if they still stand by any claim that I have not been providing Facts, Evidence, Sources, contributed Logic. God inspires me to contribute this debate for the benefit of all humanity ~ for truly only one who denies the Word of God is tempted to murder in cold blood, rape when they are neglected, be disrespectful out of selfish pompous, steal what someone has worked long for in turn for petty gain, be politically corrupt, ignore the plight of people. It is the Word of God to be decent and respectful, and though many people who deny God do so because of earthly laws and person comfort zones, It is still the Word of God to be so (kind). With a world inclined to deny the person of God, it is also inclined to become more ruthless then it is already (crime lords, politically corrupt, rapists, murderers, thieves, disrespectful boyfriends neighbors and students). This story of Creation is as scientifically accurate as the Law credited souly to the Word of God.