Biblical Creationism is Incorrect

Con states with reasoning that ignores science while claiming all scientific backing for theories which contradict the laws of nature. Con also asserts that scientific methodology progressively disproves creation. Con ignores the fact that advances in science tend to support the young earth history as recorded in the Bible. Con stated "I would like to point out the fact that the ability of science to become more accurate in response to more data is one of its strongest defenses and is what allows it to so accurately describe so much of the universe. This contrasts with Biblical Creationism, which starts with the conclusion that the Bible is correct, will never change or become more accurate, and will never add to the predictive power of human reason." Con ignores scientific evidence that is indisputably contrary to his position. This is typical for people who claim they are practicing science but in reality are practicing a pseudo-science that attempts to deny God's right to rule over them. This is also why people who erringly use science to attempt to disprove God's ownership over His creation tend to make multitudes of insults and slanders against common sense by equating God with flying spaghettti monsters. Bill Nye uses this same approach when he cannot answer the findings of his fellow scientists which point out the error of science that tries to prove origins and the rise of life contray to the laws of physics. The last statment so ignored by Con which directly shows Con's error in claiming science becomes more accurate in supporting his postitions was at the end of my round two statement........results show that because of all the helium still in the zircons, these crystals (and since this is Precambrian basement granite, by implication the whole earth) could not be older than between 4,000 and 14,000 years. In other words, in only a few thousand years, 1.5 billion years' worth (at today's rates) of radioactive decay has taken place. Interestingly, the data has since been refined and updated to give a date of 5680 ( /- 2000) years." (3) Footnotes: 1.D. Russel Humphreys, Steven A. Austin, John R. Baumgardner, Andrew A. Snelling, Helium Diffusion Rates Support Accelerated Nuclear Decay; Article available online at http://www.icr.org....... 2.The "RATE" project stands for, "Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth" 3.Carl Wieland, RATE Group Reveal Exciting. Because Con throws out more and more arguments while ignoring principals of logical deductive reasoning as I posted in the beginning of round two, and then ignores the fact that improvements in science support the young earth story as told in the Bible (another contradiction of Con's, claiming in his opening statements that Creation is Biblical but it's not in tht Bible, and then spending the whole time of the debate attmepting to discredit the Bible......this is again typical of the nonsensical reasoning of people who are putting their faith in the belief that they will never have reason to fear God) Evolution teaches that as species evolve they eventually reach ideal population levels. As species advance, superior species eliminate inferior species -- "survival of the fittest." Weak and inferior members of a species should be eliminated for the preservation of superior bloodlines and for the conservation of essential resources. "Nature" doesn't desire "the mating of weaker with stronger individuals, even less does she desire the blending of a higher with a lower race, since if she did, her whole work of higher breeding, over perhaps hundreds of thousands of years, might be ruined with one blow." [1] "Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows." [2] And as humans are merely a species of animal, we have no intrinsic value and are therefore by no means exempt from "the war of nature." Thus, we have Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) asking the rhetorical question, "should I not also have the right to eliminate millions of an inferior race that multiplies like vermin?" [3] Hitler, of course, is remembered for murdering more than 6,000,000 individual human beings, all of whom he deemed to be inferior members of the species. Was Hitler wrong? Did he misinterpret and misrepresent the theory he claimed to cherish so much? Apparently not. Renowned British evolutionary anthropologist and anatomist Sir Arthur Keith (1866-1955), who was knighted in 1921, came to Hitler's defense, "Hitler is an uncompromising evolutionist, and we must seek for an evolutionary explanation if we are to understand his actions" [4] Keith reassured us, "The German F"hrer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution." [5] Joseph Stalin (1879-1953), another ardent evolutionist, surpassed even Hitler in zeal, murdering at least ten times as many "inferiors" (estimates range from 60,000,000 to 100,000,000 people). Was Stalin wrong? What about Pol Pot? Well, not if you subscribe to the evolutionary worldview. In fact, to the philosophically consistent, uncompromised evolutionist, Hitler and Stalin ought to be considered role models. This is where evolutionary teaching leads.......it's own theory of survival of the fittest as the catalyst for improvement and advancement of species would hold whoever obtains the most power in the world to be the improvers of their kind. Most evolutionary scientists will claim to be good moral people of course, but the truth is nobody is perfect and all have broken the perfect law of God which forbids oppression and deceit even in the tiniest inner thoughts of our hearts as imperfection is offensive to God. In vengence againt His enemies. ( those He created who sought to elevate themselves to be independant of Him) He will purge His creation of the pride which denies His power, and give the rebells what they deserve....fire for the fire of their passions of pride against their Creator, and it's good no know He will not tolerate evil forever but He will confine it all to the fire of hell. Biblical Creationism is correct, as is the Judgement of God is also correct , and His mercy i giving his human enemies time to change their minds and be saved from the fire of hell which was created for the devil and his angels. God Himself took on a body to pay for mankind's sin so He could be satisfied that the death man deserves was paid for when He took it on HImself, and He rose from the grave to justify all who believe and put their trust in Him. People put faith in evolution simply because they don't want to admit that they do not deserve to live. Catastrophism -- Empirical Evidence Catastrophism is supported by actual, recorded history. Nearly 300 ancient flood legends have survived the ravishment of time. Legends of a worldwide deluge, commonly known as the "Noachian Flood," are found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, North American and South America. Furthermore, earth's sedimentary layers with the fossil record seem to suggest a past marine cataclysm. Sedimentary rock (sandstone, siltstone, shale, limestone, etc) is primarily the result of moving water, laid down layer upon layer by hydrologic sorting. Animals whose fossil remains are found within those layers must have been caught in this running water appear to have been buried and preserved. The remains, as well as the rocks, would be sorted according to density or specific gravity. Otherwise, the carcasses would rot or be scavenged. Approximately 95% of all earth's fossil remains discovered thus far are marine invertebrates. Of the remainder, approximately 4.74% are plant fossils, 0.25% are land invertebrates (including insects), and 0.0125% are vertebrates (the majority of which are fish). Roughly 95% of all land vertebrates discovered and recorded to date consist of less than one bone. The overwhelming majority of the plant fossils found appear to demonstrate an instantaneous burial. The leaves are pressed in fine sediment as if placed between the pages of a book and show no signs of decay or rot. Catastrophism -- The Noachian Flood Catastrophism is supported by the evidential data. Catastrophism supports the Noachian Flood. Dramatic evidence is everywhere except in the popular press. For instance, who is aware that fossil remains of clams (found in the closed position, indicating they were buried alive) have been found atop Mt. Everest? What about whale fossils and petrified trees that stand upright through multiple sedimentary layers supposedly separated by millions of years? It is a remarkable time to reinvestigate the facts and determine your own position. In 1999, the human population passed six billion. In 1985, it passed five billion. In 1962, it passed three billion. In 1800, it passed one billion. In 1 AD, the world's population, according to the censuses taken by the governments of that time, was only 250 million. At the current human population growth rate, considering wars and famines and all such variables, it would take approximately 5,000 years to get the current population from two original. Age of Earth: Be Wary of Unreasonable Conclusions Age of Earth: Perhaps a better question is not "What is the Age of the Earth?", but rather, "Are we being educated or indoctrinated?" Our children are not being taught what the evidence is and how to think about it, they are being taught to memorize a small portion of inconsequential data and to believe an unreasonable conclusions. I'm trying to keep the focus on the Biblical creation story as correct in it's teaching of a young earth, approzimately 6000 years from the day it was created. I have addressed philosiphical arguements agaisnt God because Con has thrown those things out as reasons to reject the Biblical creationism which Con says is not in the Bible.