It would be better to Einstein than Superman

I thank Con for his well crafted rebuttals. My responses are presented as followsCon"s ArgumentsQuote: "A life of honesty, morality, and integrity...super power."Rebuttal: None. I believe it is a great summary of Superman characteristics. I completely agree with Con on this point and I believe that Superman deserves the praises.Quote: "Superman has an aura of reassurance about him, it"s as...people."Rebuttal: Given the fact that Superman possesses super-strengthen and next to indestructible body, his presence alone can make the direst situation seem safer. I have no contention with respect to the assertion itself, but rather, I will be addressing the unintended consequence of "aura of reassurance about him." Unduly rely on any particular person, Superman in this case, would give rise to many undesirable consequences. Prolonged exposures to unbounded help would necessarily render people to lose their senses of independence over a long period of time. Gradually, these group of people will tend to believe that they would be helped regardless of the situations, and they should have nothing to worry about. It is a type of indoctrination that would deprive the basic rights of any individual, i.e., the right of being independent. Although "aura of reassurance" is unquestionably one of the greatest effects that Superman would possibly bring upon us, it might also lead to the collapse of human civilizations.Quote: "He""s got all the power of god, yet...makes them feel special"Rebuttal: Frequently, an extreme righteous person (Superman, by the very definition, fits the profile), is incredibly easy to be manipulated. Extreme views would necessarily cause people to view the world in black and white only. On 27 November 1095, Pope Urabn II, when addressing at Clermont, famously stated, "Enter on the road to the Holy Sepulchre; wrest that land from wicked race and subject it to ourselves." The crows answered the pope: God wills it!" and that is the beginning of the First Crusade. During the battle of Jerusalem, feverish Crusaders virtually "neutralized" everyone in the holy city simply because all these Jerusalemites did not believe in Christianity. Therefore, if Superman indeed got all the power of a god, it would mean the end of the world we know it. My ArgumentsQuote: "I would like to clarify your point about the political influence of Einstein...Justices of crimes"Response: Separation of power asserts that, and I quote: " All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives." Con"s statement about the involvement in the justice of crimes is considered as an exercise of Judicial Power, rather than a Legislative Power, where the Political Power draws its sources.Quote: "But is political influence always good? Superman has saved the mind...used in Wars"Response: During the same time, Adolf Hitler was activity pursuing the idea of nuclear bombs, if not had already ordered the creation. If, however, Albert Einstein did not exert his political influence during that time, Germany may become the creator of nuclear bombs. If Adolf Hitler strictly adhered to his political ideology, many more lives would be perished because of it. Therefore, to a certain extent, Albert Einstein did the right thing. As he said to his friend, Linus Pauling: " there was some justification - the danger that the Germans would make them..." Quote: "Albert Einstein: Albert Einstein had made signifiant contributions...freedom and equality"The following statements are not a fair representation of my political and social views. Nevertheless I will present them for the sake of my argument. It is not my intention to be provocative.Response: "Peace is not the natural order of things, you are either the predator, or the prey." As a miracle of nature, human race is necessarily subject to the natural law: Survival of the fittest. Collaborations among different counties are a necessary mean to insure the very survival of a particular nation, i.e., race. Violences are inevitable results when two forces collide. From the rise of Athen to collapse of Rome Empire, from the capture of Jerusalem by Saladin to the destroy of London, from first Persia Gulf War to the current Arab Spring, War is inevitable, and history has clearly shown a pattern of repetition. Punic Wars, for example, lead to the utter destruction of Carthage, and the entire race was annihilated and extinguished. War is human history and it is part of human life. Therefore, to ensure the very survival of an individual race, war is necessary and unstoppable. As a predator, it is your instinct to prey on the weak. Have you ever seen or can you conjure up a picture that a lamb lies beside a lion without being eaten or terrified by its predator? The constant conflicts and strifes displayed within the human races are similar to the relation between a strong predator and weak prey. You either have to choose eat or chosen to be eaten. Since the war is inevitable, and as long as you are on the winning side of the military confrontations (predator), it would be better to be someone who has made a significant contribution to it. Albert Einstein fits the profile.Quote: "I would like to clarify your point about intellectual intelligence...isn"t Everything"Response: Albert Einstein has everything that Superman has in terms of intelligence. All the features, including but not limited to, "incredibly amazing at decision making, problem solving, being observant and planning", are a precondition of being a scientist. One step wrong in scientific investigations would be the end of your career if not life. Albert Einstein may not have "interpersonal intelligence", but he gained a thoroughly desired tranquility of human life, a privilege that Superman can never have. Quote: "I would like to clarify your point about Perennial Legacy...good role model"Response: Although reluctantly, I might have to concede this point. My reason is twofold:First, I did not do an adequate research on the contributions of Superman. I made the statement out of hasty rather than rationality. I have shown a lack of judgement thereby sabotaging my force of arguments.Second, the only defense that I might be able to conjure without starting arguing the competing values is that the very word of Legacy presupposes the existence of death and Superman has yet died. The reasoning, however, is overwhelming unconvincing. The argument with reference to the competing values (scientific legacy vs. social influences) would consume too much space and time, and it is not an economic solution that I am interested to pursue.For the record, I will be changing my assertions to "In terms of Perennial Legacy, Superman is no better than Albert Einstein." Nevertheless, Albert Einstein will still collect three points whereas Superman has only one point, and consequently Albert Einstein wins the contest.Unfortunately, due to the space constrain, I will have to address my last two points in our next round. I deeply apologrize for any inconvenience that my action may have caused. To con: Given the fact that I was also running out of time, I made my decision without consulting you. I will not be making any excuse but only your forgiveness.