It's time to send all Western Muslims back to the Middle East

I would like to start this argument, by explaining how my opponent's regard to my counter-statement is invalid. The 300 thing was simply an example, and my opponent seems to be thinking that was an actual statistic. Sweden's statistics were interpreted incorrectly by many, because they labelled them differently. This is a simple mistake, that my opponent was wrongfully using as an argument. "Con has blatantly ignored that Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia(which has 3 million openly available hajj tents with AC) are not taking any refugees. Why do you think that is? I'll take a stab at it" I would also like to remind my opponent that Saudi Arabia is a dictatorship and shouldn't be used as a point in an argument. People in Saudi Arabia are being lashed for witchcraft and my opponent apparently believes they are still a rightful source of intelligence. Moreover, Osama Bin-laden was Saudi Arabian and Saudi Arabia (a Muslim state) despised him along with Al-Qaeda proving that there are different kinds of Islam opposing each other apparently contrary to the belief of my opponent. "Islam is not a race. It's a religion that teaches to destroy all non-Muslims systematically through silent jihad." I'm sorry but this is just outrageously untrue. My opponent is stretching every little bit of information he knows about this topic, and turning it into a completely false statement. Muslims don't want to destroy everyone else, it's more about oneness between everything. And even if this were true, the Christian bible states that all non-Christians shall perish once Jesus reappears on Earth. How is this different from your vision of Islam? "The morning after the 9/11 attacks...we began talking about the Twin Towers attack. Ruud shook his head sadly about it all. He said, "It's so weird, isn't it, all these people saying this has to do with Islam?" I couldn't help myself...I blurted out, "But it *is* about Islam. This is based in belief. This is Islam." Ruud said, "Ayaan, of course these people may have been Muslims, but they are a lunatic fringe. We have extremist Christians, too, who interpret the bible literally. Most Muslims do not believe these things. To say so is to disparage a faith which is the second largest religion in the world, and which is civilized, and peaceful." I walked into the office thinking, "I have to wake these people up."...The Dutch had forgotten that it was possible for people to stand up and wage war, destroy property, imprison, kill, impose laws of virtue because of the call of God. That kind of religion hadn't been present in Holland for centuries. It was not a lunatic fringe who felt this way about America and the West. I knew that a vast mass of Muslims would see the attacks as justified retaliation against the infidel enemies of Islam." 2)"In the real world, equal respect for all cultures doesn't translate into a rich mosaic of colorful and proud peoples interacting peacefully while maintaining a delightful diversity of food and craftwork. It translates into closed pockets of oppression, ignorance, and abuse." 3)"Infuriatingly stupid analysts - especially people who called themselves Arabists, yet who seemed to know next to nothing about the reality of the Islamic world - wrote reams of commentary [after 9/11]. Their articles were all about Islam saving Aristotle and the zero, which medieval Muslim scholars had done more than eight hundred years ago; about Islam being a religion of peace and tolerance, not the slightest bit violent. These were fairy tales, nothing to do with the real world I knew." "I lived in countries that had no democracy... so I don't find myself in the same luxury as you do. You grew up in freedom, and you can spit on freedom because you don't know what it is like to not have it..but you will if you keep allowing Islam into the West." I will once again counter my opponent's argument: I really dislike how Ayaan tries to make his friend here sound like some kind of infant incapable of logical thinking. No, this is not Islam. I could not agree with Ayaan's friend more. Bin-Laden himself said that 9/11 only occurred in an attempt to put America in a fearful state. This had nothing to do with Islam; this was just something Al-Qaeda did to send America into a panic. Additionally, Muslims in the west do not associate themselves with these people. My opponent's statement is incorrect: He is simply taking things that hardly qualify as true in the first place, stretching them and then using them as a 'legitimate' route to his entire argument. He is dodging the reality of what he is actually saying and using invalid methods to support his flawed case. In relation to all who criticize Muslim immigration into the west, my opponent is providing false/no statistics in his statements. In my opinion, they are simple, crude and extremely racist comments and statements. My opponent's dislike for the immigration of Muslims is all opinion-based and illegitimate. He isn't backing up anything he says with real, legitimate, hard facts. This is very similar to the way (in my opinion) that Donald Trump is regarding Islam. He is making broad and stretched statements that ignorant people can mistake as the truth just because it's a rant. It's accurate to consider my opponent's arguments as incarnations of Trump's opinions regarding Islam. "Immigration moderation. Before any new green cards are issued to foreign workers abroad, there will be a pause where employers will have to hire from the domestic pool of unemployed immigrant and native workers. This will help reverse women's plummeting workplace participation rate, grow wages, and allow record immigration levels to subside to more moderate historical averages." -https://www.donaldjtrump.com... For example, just read this section from Donald Trump's website. It mentions no link between green cards and foreign workers, it just claims it will change the outcome of the situation. I promise you, there is no statistic that supports this; this is just racism as a whole. This is essentially my opponent's argument: Either a stretched statement or absurd reasoning with tons of missing links. Thank you.