Which is more moral? Man or YOUR god of the bible or torah? Take a morality test to find out its man

Before I begin I just want to say that I think this is an interesting topic to argue, and I am looking forward to the debate. I just want to extend a bit of cordiality to Backwardseden. Thank you for the opportunity to debate, and hopefully some truth in unearthed here. The framework of my argument will be the following: An individual may possess objective morals through his or her religion, while society, which will always be home to people who do not share that religion, cannot hold objective moral truths. 1)Penalties for sins outlined by the bible a.The context of the verse nullifies the question: The verse in Leviticus which condemns blasphemy is from the Old Testament of the Bible. The Old Testament outlines the covenant that the Christian God held with humanity before the resurrection. This was overwritten by the new testament, which basically installs grace as a tenant of Christianity. The Christian definition of grace states that God"s son took the penalties outlined in the old testament, and there for any condemnation and its penalty was removed. This means that blasphemy, as well as any form of sin, cannot be condemned by man, and for believers will not be condemned by God. Thus, the answer to the question proposed is no. b.Point A extends to the questions on working on the Sabbath, cursing at one"s parents, committing adultery, being homosexual, and idolatry. It is worth noting that homosexuality is a contentious point for Christians, as many see it as a deal breaker. However, this is not the case because whether you use the Pope"s statement that it is fine to be part of the LGBTQ, or whether you follow the traditional view that it falls into the category of idolatry. The fact is that the Bible and more specifically the New Testament makes no distinction that there is any special penalty for homosexuality, or being any part of the LGBTQ, as the aforementioned definition of grace supersedes any opinion that a given church may hold. Following this, no human following Christianity can possibly rule on any of these issues on God"s behalf. Additionally, whether or not these are sins in the first place, is a moral issue, one which society can never take an absolute stance on, thus showing that man is incapable of being moral by definition. c.A belief of Christianity is that non-believers should not, and cannot be held to the beliefs of Christianity, because justice belongs to God. This means that the question that any action should be taken on behalf of the Christian God by any person can be answered with the simple truth no person can deliver justice on God"s behalf. Thus, the answer is no. d.Concluding that man is not moral compared to God for this contention: First, man as a whole (society) being unable to establish 100% objective moral truth due to inevitably differing beliefs, cannot be more moral than a being who is defined as the origin of all moral truth. Secondly, man is unable to deliver justice on Gods behalf, as man's justice is never 100% correct, and therefore, man cannot be more moral than God. 2)On the conclusion of Moral Bankruptcy a.I am a Christian, and I have answered no to every single question, based not on my own morals, but morals which I take from Christianity. Because of this, I conclude that I am not more moral than my God. b.While some Christians may answer yes to these, such answers would not be founded on the Moral truths given by God, and so they would be making such condemnations based on the morals of man. By the logic of the assertion made by my opponent in his conclusion, this would make man morally bankrupt and corrupt. While God"s morals may define these issues as sin, he doesn't condemn or levy any penalty to anyone while on earth, because of grace. No matter what people say about God punishing evil deeds on earth, that fact is that a core Christian belief " Grace " dictates that judgment is reserved for the afterlife. Finally, for believers, no condemnation is levied for any of these issues because of the resurrection. The final conclusion of this contention is that man is less moral than the Christian God. Conclusion: Since man has no objective morality on its own, and God by definition has a single moral code which no man can use to condemn another man, and since I have answered "no" to all my opponents question as per the rules defined by my opponent, It must be concluded for this first round that the my God (the Christian God) is indeed more Moral than Man. One anecdote for the road: Members of the LGBTQ have died at the hands of man, but God died for the life of both.