Experts' Tier R1: In a fair fight, Mace Windu would likely defeat Yoda.

Pro's Case Pro continues to assert that points were dropped when it was already showed that no points were dropped. 1. While pro asserts that Mace Windu would be able to detect such a weakness, the question remains of whether or not he could take advantage of this. Pro asserts that if Yoda held his lightsaber blade even a few millimeters too high, Mace Windu could take advantage of it. However, since (as pro mentions) no fighter is perfect, Yoda might not be able to hold a blade to a precision of a few millimeters (just try holding a sword perfectly still. It's very hard), and therefore such minute imprecisions in Yoda's stance could render such use of the Shatterpoint ability useless in many situations. 2. Pro makes the assumption that Mace Windu could land multiple blows before Yoda could move. Due to the lack of times when both Jedi have fought each other, such a statement is no more then an assumption. We can not deduce whether or not this is even a possibility given the lack of evidence. 3. Pro contends that both Jedi are equal with the use of the Force Wave. 4. Just as it can be said that Yoda's acrobatics must seize, this is due to the same limitations that both Jedi have: energy. Fighting will drain each Jedi of energy, and both Jedi must stop eventually. Judging from the extensive use of acrobatics by Yoda, it could seem as though Yoda may have the greater level of energy. 5. While pro compares the retrieval of the X-wing with the lifting of the AT-TE, he doesn't take into account the fact that the X-wing was buried under mud and water and could have had various plant life wrapped around components, making such a retrieval much more difficult than just lifting an X-wing on dry ground. 6. Pro admits that Yoda and Mace Windu are equally matched by citing a comparison between Count Dooku and Yoda, and Count Dooku and Mace Windu. The only difference that he states is due to Mace Windu knowing more about a lightsaber form than Yoda. As has been asserted before, increased knowledge of something is not always an advantage. 7. Pro commits and existential logical fallacy by asserted that a universal premise (The use of Vaapad being akin to Force abilities) has a specific conclusion (therefore Vaapad can counter Yoda's Force assisted acrobatics). 8. It was never mentioned that anyone was tricked in the last round for this point. Secondly, as shown by the use of the Force against two large landing craft, Yoda has displayed power on par, if not greater than Mace Windu. 9. The point wasn't that Yoda was about to defeat Dooku, it was that Dooku felt that he was about to be defeated by Yoda. It was that Dooku felt that he was going to lose the battle, not that Yoda was going to win. 10. If such a battle moved to the sky, I believe that such an act might fall under the definition of a "special advantage" as outlined by the definition of what isn't a fair fight. 11. Again, pro asserts an existential fallacy by asserting that the universal premise (Mace Windu is superior to Asajj Ventress) has a particular conclusion (Mace Windu would better resist disarming attempts by Yoda). 12. Just as a general looks at a map and analyzes decisions, so to must a duelist look at his opponents moves and analyze strategies for attack and defense. 13. Pro fails to assert evidence that Yoda used Force Valor. 14. Escape does not mean defeat. In a duel, Yoda could easily escape due to his explosive use of acrobatics, hide and recover for a short time before re-engaging Mace Windu, just as Count Dooku escaped a confrontation with Yoda. Yoda's Force Powers Still pro insists on asserting dropped points, when the point remains that Dooku felt that he was going to be defeated, and therefore left the fight. While pro asserts that sources were used, the only mention of a superconducting loop as part of Vaapad is this: "The practitioner of Vaapad would accept the fury of their opponent, transforming them into one half of a superconducting loop, with the other half being the power of darkness inherent in the opponent. ". It makes no mention of the turning Sith lighting into a superconducting loop, but rather seems to use the term as a metaphor. Pro re-asserts that the sources state that the Vaapad technique creates the loop of superconductivity, and not that it was just a metaphor as asserted above. Lastly, pro once again falsely accuses me of dropping points even though pro did not address that point in the last round. Yoda's Lightsaber Abilities Pro continues to assert that energy is a key factor, even though pro neglects that escape is always a possibility as shown by Count Dooku. Yoda's Past Feats Pro still falsely accusing me of dropping points, even though (A) I met that point, and (B) as con, while it is my job to prove victory, proving a non-defeat is just as valid as it discredits Mace Windu's ability to win. Pro contends that Mace Windu failed to react within a span on multiple seconds to save his own limbs (and his life for that matter). Still. .. yet again. .. pro falsely accuses me of dropping points. As pro shows, I addressed the point, and therefore pro self-refutes his own statement. Voting Issues Yoda would defeat Mace Windu in a fair fight because. .. 1. Yoda's strength in the Force is unmatched by Mace Windu 2. Yoda's acrobatics are unmatched by Windu 3. Yoda lived to die of old age, unlike Mace Windu who was murdered. 4. Yoda was Mace Windu's master, and therefore taught, and henceforth knows many, of not most of Mace Windu's moves. 5. On many other grounds, both duelists are equal in strategy accomplishments in life, and therefore the above reasons put Yoda as the superior duelist.