Humans cannot prove the existence of a God or Deity.

First of all, the Bible is most likely fiction. You are correct that I can't prove 100% for sure that it's fiction, but evidence suggests it is. It has many stories, such as turning water to wine, and other stories like that which are scientifically impossible. There are also many different versions of the Bible, having different stories, number of pages, etc. But that's not what this debate is about, the Bible proves nothing about God's existence, though. If you give evidence that it does, I would love to hear it. You then state that people have proven it, but people just don't believe it. This may be because there is no way to prove that God's existence can be 100% proven. As I said, nobody in history has proven that God does not exist, and nobody has proven that he does. We can't know until we die. Next you say I said there was evidence against God. There is. There is more evidence that he doesn't exist than evidence that he does. That's why I'm an Agnostic Atheist, I believe that God cannot be proven to exist or not exist, but I lean toward him not existing. If I did say there was proof that God doesn't exist, then I worded it wrong. I don't believe I did, but I could be wrong. Now on to your sources: Your first source starts by saying the universe could not create its self. Well, you believe God is there, but he had to have had a beginning, and because he exists, he can't create himself. If God does in fact exist, something had to have created him. It also states that the universe is not infinite, but at the same time, it is. The universe is always expanding, at a quick rate, actually. An example would be an infinite number, an infinite number has to keep going to be infinite, and never stop. The universe has never stopped. Also, we can't prove something can't bring itself into existence, I'm not saying it can, but maybe some long time into the future we may find proof. Your second source starts by saying that evolution can't be proven. Correct, it can't. It does, however have more evidence than creationism, which we cannot possibly have any evidence for, as we were not there, and there is nothing to support it. Many who believe in God believe in evolution, they say God has caused it. Even that is more logical than creationism. It goes on to give no evidence that God can be proven, saying that just because the Bible says God is real that he is. That is not proof. The rest of it says things that do not prove anything, and most of which are still making scientists scratch their heads. It doesn't prove God exists, just that new laws and theories may be being made. Your third source is just agreeing with me. It states that being an Atheist is making an assumption, but then is being a Christian not an assumption? It is, actually. I remember saying God cannot be proven to exist, and cannot be proven to not exist, but maybe you have forgotten. I'm not going to get to much into your next source, as again, it is stating theories. Just because they say God exists because of so and so, does not make it true! There are.billions of stars and planets, Earth's existence could be just pure coincidence. On to your final source. I'm just going to give you a few quotes on this one, and explain why they prove God can't be proven. ' I believe we can answer yes to the first four of these questions about the existence of God but not to the fifth. God exists, we can know that, we can give reasons, and those reasons amount to proof, but not scientific proof, except in an unusually broad sense.' Those reasons amount to evidence, not proof. He even says, they don't amount to scientific proof! 'A thing can exist whether we know it or not.' This sides with my argument! We can't know God exists! In conclusion, during Con's previous argument, she gives sources which give possible theories, but don't prove anything. Some of her sources even side with my argument!