The United States should have the Queen as Head of State

I would just like to thank my opponent for accepting this debateBefore I begin, I would just like to note that we hope to replace the office of Head of State with our Sovereign Queen. Her Majesty, or her representative in the United States, the Governor-General, would assume the original, Constitutional powers of the President of the United States, and would serve as a non-partisan and impartial arbiter of our Constitutional government. The Royalist Tea Party would also see the United States join the Commonwealth of Nations, in the interest of forming stronger cultural, trade, and political bonds with nations who share our heritage in the English language, British liberty, and peace among nations. In simple words, here would be the changes in our government: 01. American President 02. House of Commons 03. Parliament 04. Her Majesty.Currently the President of the United States is both Head of Government[1] and Head of State[2]. We believe that the American public would be better served if these positions were separate, with the latter being held by an un-elected, non-partisan monarch. "The American people are increasingly waking up to the fact that nothing ever seems to change in Washington D.C. no matter which political party is in power. An all-time high 53 percent of all Americans believe that neither party "represents the American people". Over the past several decades, we have sent a Bush, a Clinton, another Bush and an Obama to the White House, but the policies coming out of Washington have remained pretty much the same the entire time. The mainstream media would have us believe that the Republicans and the Democrats are constantly fighting like cats and dogs, but the truth is that the Republicans want to take us to the same place that the Democrats want to take us - just a little more slowly perhaps. And behind the scenes, Republicans and Democrats have a good time with one another and they are ultimately controlled by the same set of oligarchs. The Americans people are really starting to recognize what a sham our system has become, and the numbers show that they are quite fed up with it."[3] According to Simon Upton, New Zealand Environment Minister, March 1994, he says: "The public are sick and tired of politics, they are sick and tired of the machinations of elected office in a media age, and I think it’s quite good having a Head of State that’s completely to one side of that." Stability is one of the biggest advantages. In Canada, they know who the Head of State will be probably for the next 60 to 80 years. The Head of State is above politics, so does not have to cater to one side or the other to get voted in. E.g., in the USA, the Republicans pretty much range from dislike to outright hatred of Obama, no matter what he does, good, bad, or otherwise. In Canada, the Queen is not "for" nor "against" any of the parties. It is also a lot cheaper[5]. While in Canada, they elect MP's[4]. There is also a huge "coolness" factor.[6] The Queen is someone they can all look up to, and take pride in.[7]Sources: [1] http://goo.gl...[2] http://goo.gl...[3] http://goo.gl...[4] http://goo.gl...[5] http://goo.gl...[6] http://goo.gl..., http://goo.gl...[7] http://goo.gl..., http://goo.gl..., http://goo.gl...