JK Rowling (Harry Potter) plagarized from Travel with Li Po

I firmly believe my sources proven how fictional writing works and it debunks all of William Kelly's plagiarism and other accusations against JK Rowling (1)(2). You say that it is all about the laws of plagiarism but laws are changed and influence by logic (3). So the ruling of the plagiarism laws can be dismisses by how the logic of fiction writing works or there will be very few fictional writing works in the world instead of millions. Laws and policy are made to be fair but simple as possible. I believe my experts words should be accounted for because they have enough background, education and research to know how the rules, unavoidable clichï¿½s and elements of fiction writing based on their logic on literature and how literature being influenced in the real world (4). Your presenter of your video in your third around argument doesn't explain against directly my experts so your video has no meaning against mine and what does he or William Kelly know about fiction writing or any evidence that can rule against my experts? So the rules and elements of fiction writing dismiss all the plagiarism claims and other accusations against JK Rowling. The experts and endorsers of my "Star Wars: A Legacy Revealed" videos in the first round debate explain the common ideas of fiction writing, elements, rules, the clichï¿½s and the influences that work around fiction writing that would dismisses your and William Kelly's theory about plagiarism against JK Rowling and her works on Harry Potter. The experts from my videos and the examples from other works using the same ideas as "Travelers with Li Po" and "Harry Potter" are evidence that proves my theories right. "Cast of Series Introduced", "FINDS HIMSELF IN A SURREAL WORLD," and many others "stolen ideas that Kelly claim Rowling to have stole". Realizing these elements, clichï¿½s and there are a million of other works using these ideas (5) is not rocket science, it is easy to recognize. William Kelly doesn't seem to realize how fiction writing works and doesn't see how many times his ideas been used by other works, proving that his word is prejudice and unreliable. I realize no other unprejudiced words can back up Kelly's claims. Closing Statement… Plagiarism laws are based on ‘the expression of an original idea' or ‘taking someone's work word for word' (6). Based on my other evidence and sources, William Kelly's ideas are not original and there is no same expression of an idea. Just ideas that are known as elements and must have for fiction writing as so many other works used these ideas too. They made the elements so, not Kelly. My examples from other works show and tell that how easy to think up ideas that W. Kelly falsely claim and accused Rowling to have stole. How do he knows that Rowling DIDN'T got her ideas elsewhere as there are more than a million possibilities? We can't not believe his word because he stubbornly refuse to believe Rowling could have gotten the same ideas elsewhere and he did not know that ‘his' ideas have been used so many times and by so many other works? Because of that why he knows about plagiarism when he doesn't know about the art of ideas in fiction writing. All my evidence may not show Rowling didn't plagiarized (in other words COPY) from "Travelers with Li Po" but it shows the million of possibilities that she did not. Think of the best theory, evidence and logic here (7), what do you think the most explainable theory, evidence and logic here. Compare mine vs. my opponents, which ones you know are the better and more reliable theory and logic and the ones that should take accounted more? 1.)http://www.travelswithlipo.com... 2.)http://travelswithlipo.com... 3.)http://thomas.loc.gov... 4.)http://www.theforce.net... 5.)http://tvtropes.org... 6.)http://www.plagiarism.org... 7.)http://writingcenter.unc.edu...