BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The Tiger was the greatest tank of ww2

I'm going to keep this short and brief. The Germans produced tanks only after much modelling, and even then the prototype would be rearranged extensively. How can vouch for this? German tanks had a kill ratio of 3:1, some historians even saying 5:1. Name one tank model that was better then the Tiger. It scored the most kills per tank out of all tanks during ww2, and the number tank ace of ww2, Michael Wittman, commanded a Tiger. The tank may have had a faulty engine, but the gun and armour were incomparable.
The Tiger was the greatest tank of ww2

Why do you need proof? Why don't I just go to Google and type the 88mm flak gun? Because Google can be unreliable. DUH. Anyway, here's why IS-2 is better(But not my favorite tank). Its armour is 0.7 to 5.2, thicker armour than most of the Soviet tanks. Its maximum range is 155 miles, while the Tiger's maximum range is 75 miles. Its combat weight is 51 tons so it won't strain its engine (You already point out the Tiger's engine's problem anyway). It's smaller, meaning that it won't be a huge target for the enemies. Its problem is that the rate of fire is slow due to the cramp space of the tank and because the shot and cartridge . Another problem is that it's too light, especially for an heavy tank (It was suppose to be a heavy tank). P.S Take a chill pill please. You sound like you are about to explode.
The Tiger was the greatest tank of ww2

I need proof that the 88mm flak gun existed? Why don't you quickly google it and compare and the picture, first-hand accounts, and forums to that of your doubt for the most produced anti-aircraft gun of the war. It was incorporated onto such tanks as the Jagdpanther, Nashorn, elefant, and of course the Tiger. Seriously, contempt like that shows your laziness to take 2 seconds of of your visit to this site to make a researched rebuttal. You so eloquently ask me why the Tiger can be compared to the "amazing" M36 Jackson and the "spectacular" Is-2. You state that it was actually the Js-2, there was never such a tank. What makes you think that the 90mm gun on the M36 could penetrate 120mm of armour with ease? The Tiger had greater overall armour then the M36, and the M36 had an open chassis, so fires and shrapnel were more likely to be set off. However for the Is-2, you can debate how it was better then the Tiger. You need to start justifying your platform, it is very annoying when you just say something like it is a statement. Also, what's with that random how come at the end of your paragraph? Resources, WW2 general resources,WW2 history.com
I can post a funnier video than my opponent.

http://www.youtube.com... I would like to thank PRO for challenging me to this fun debate. Since my opponent was the instigator he had the BoP to prove that he could post a funnier video than I could. Seeing that we both posted the same video, the resolution has been negated and the voters should vote CON no matter how big of a jack@ss I may be since it is undeniable that my opponent has NOT proven he can post a funnier video than me. Yet in order to prove I spent time and effort on this, I have included a list of honorable mentions I discovered through the interent and seriously considered to post for my round at the bottom. www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtXC9ZU51qI www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzXg66hSGv8 www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0DmtmmFEVo
A Just Society Ought to Presume Consent for Organ Procurement from the Deceased

Yes it is at a great regret that so many lives are lost each year to not having enough donors. But in cases of the other countries that you pointed out, only 4 (as of 2011) are infront of the US 1. spain 2. croatia 3.portugal 4. US. another fact from 2014 There are currently 123,175 people waiting for lifesaving organ transplants in the U.S. Of these, 101,170 await kidney transplants. In 2013, 16,896 kidney transplants took place in the U.S. Of these, 11,163 kidney transplants came from deceased donors and 5,733 came from living donors. 2013 Living Donor Age Breakdown: Ages 18-34: 29.8% Ages 35-49: 40.9% Ages 50-64: 27.2% Age 65+: 2.1% 2013 Living Donor Gender Breakdown: Male: 38.6% Female: 61.4% 2013 Living Donor Ethnicity Breakdown: White/Caucasian: 69.5% Black: 11.1% Hispanic: 13.9% Asian: 3.9% American Indian/Alaska Native: 0.4% Pacific Islander: 0.3% Multiracial: 0.9% 2013 Living donor relationship to recipient: Parent to child: 477 Child to parent: 863 Identical twin: 10 Full sibling: 1,056 Half sibling: 58 Other relative: 422 Spouse or life partner: 690 Unrelated paired donation: 462 Unrelated anonymous donor: 177 Other Key Facts: On average: Nearly 3,000 new patients are added to the kidney waiting list each month. 12 people die each day while waiting for a life-saving kidney transplant Every 14 minutes someone is added to the kidney transplant list In 2013, 4,453 patients died while waiting for a kidney transplant. to me this is interesting 101,179+ waiting for kidney transplants and a total of 123,175 needing transplant. Kidney transplant is the majority that is needed. i cant seem to find stats for other countries on what organ transplant they are waiting for. But also transplants at that magnitude may possibly be unlikely in other countries. Especially with america leading the way in diabetes and that affecting our kidney make it worthless as we get older which could indicate the overzealous amount of kidney transplant needed. Secondly the cost of a transplant Spain which the healthcare and the government foots majority of the bill on is undergoing a cost crisis in which they cut little over 9 billion for that purpose and will continually to cut funds due to lack of finance. US has some subsidies for living organ donors but nothing that will take care of us or the bills during recovery time. So majority of living donors are rejected due to lack of funds, savings, possibly going into debt, and etc.. which someone at the hospital will go over everything to see if financially you can donate. Where as in other countries the hospital/governement will help with the financial burden for saving someones life.
Is religion necessary in humanity

I don't believe believe non-religious really affects your health or spirit. People don't desperately need answers to what we shouldn't be able to comprehend, I haven't been religious since I was 11 when discovered how much the bible is wrong http://answers.yahoo.com... to be specific when I discovered it described the world as flat. http://answers.yahoo.com... In the time since I discovered this I've had a lot of deep thoughts and decided to treat all fairly and to always be happy because you can only be happy for so long. (my favorite songs) , Before this, I was always whiny, ignorant, self-absorbed, and loved garbage that has no meaning. (Linkin Park)
Athletes Are Way Overpaid

Your argument is invalid to the topic. It isn't the job of the atheletes to pay Americas working force. Whether or not they should donate their money is completely irrelevant to the topic question. You have continuously failed to provide an argument that supports your point, and nearly came up with examples of what they should do with the money they earn. This debate on wether or not athletes are overpaid, which I would argue only one of us really debated, is completely irrelevant to the points you put forward, nor have you came up with any rebuttals to my points.
Athletes Are Way Overpaid

Tell me this , would you say people in the military police, firefighters etc only deserve 30,000 dollars yearly average for defending our country and saving lives daily. I don't think lets say Lebron James, he make 20 million dollars yearly. You don't think some of that money, not saying were taking it from these athletes. We would just but lowering they're pay to lets say 18 million, but those are over or under calculated, so I would be contradicting myself in a way.
Athletes Are Way Overpaid

So let me start off by saying our own president earns a yearly salary of $400,000, and he runs our country, while the athletes just provide amusement. Don't get me wrong sports are a huge part of world culture, but paying an athlete $5 million for a single year is just overpriced. There are doctors who save lives every day and do not make anything close to that amount. Not too mention active military forces, retired veterans in need of support, police officers and firemen only to name a few big ones. Lets say I made a $100,000 off the Superbowl, don't you think america could give at least a tenth of $100,000, which is only ten grand to support some of our hardest working people america in there minute pay cut
Athletes Are Way Overpaid

I hope that this will go well. Many people would like to argue that the amounts of money that athletes make are exceptional, at least they are at first glance. Now the main question here is that although these athletes are exceptionally talented at what they do, does that warrant millions and millions of dollars? I would like to begin by considering the amount of money that professional players bring to their respective sports through merchandise sales, ticket revenue, and television broadcasts. They easily bring more profit to their teams and their overall sport than they themselves could ever make. Without their presence on the court or field, fans wouldn"t flock in such high numbers to see a single game and would refuse to spend huge amounts of cash on team merchandise and memorabilia. Many places in the world exist In a free market economy, where people have a choice to buy whatever they can afford. As we all know, Americans spend an extensive amount of money on sporting events and merchandise annually. Since this is the case, star players are really getting paid exactly what they are worth. Professional athletes who develop their talents and skills to a higher level than their peers will naturally demand a higher compensation. This should be a fact that won't surprise anyone; if someone does a better job at something than anyone else, that person is going to get paid significantly better. This is true for almost any job, and the world of sports is no exception. The best players get the best salaries. Because fans are willing to pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars to be entertained by people who can do something worlds better than the majority, professional athletes deserve to be compensated accordingly. Their abilities and talents are rare and highly developed, requiring countless hours of training and practice. This isn"t just a hobby to them as it is to most of us. To them, It"s their job. If a player is the best the sport has to offer, then he or she is deserving of that incredible salary that they earn at every game. Another point to consider is that most athletes do not play as many years as we might expect, below are statistics for the general span of time that a professional player with play a single sport: Baseball: 5 and a half years. Basketball: 5 years. Football: 3 years. Now, taking into consideration the number of working years that most Americans have, being 40-45, this working time frame is incredibly short. While a majority of us are bringing home much smaller paychecks, we also tend to bring home FAR more than any professional athlete ever would. Professional sports tend to be so demanding that after only a few years many athletes are unable to compete any longer. Whereas most people are able to use their years of experience to their advantage in their job, professional athletes get replaced by younger, uninjured players. Considering the short span of most professional athletes" careers, they essentially need to have the ability to earn their lifetime salary over the course of only a couple of years.
Athletes Are Way Overpaid

Athletes are way overpaid, Direct quote from Forbes " 23 NBA players made $15 million or more during the 2014-2015 season, with eight pulling down $20 million or more. Typically, those are the massive salaries devoted to the NBA's elite players, but many players are still millionaires even if they are riding the bench" The average amount of money made by a player in the NBA is 5.15 million dollars, quoted from INB times. Sports are a huge part of our history, and really the whole worlds history, but does that give the world to overpay them. Lets say I have 10 million dollars I just made from throwing a ball in a net. I would be a greedy rat with all that money, but We should give at least give a tenth of 10 million dollars to our under payed police, firefighters, active Military and veterans only to name some big ones. God its like were blocking the people who deserve money who do so much, like risking they're life every day for us, greedy nasty pigs called Americans, and bread filled skinny bony dogs. put that on the bible........................BOOOOOM!!!!
George bush was a good president

1. This only works if the tax relief was beneficial. The tax cuts had no effect on the poor, helped the wealthy, but never trickled down.{1} If it never trickles down it doesn't help the American people. 2. The war was unjust, the speed of Sadams fall is irrelevant. Self defense is the only justified reason for war. Iraq was not self defense, at least not directly. The war was easily avoidable.{2} 3. Al Qaeda is definitely smaller, but their attacks continue on Christian monuments.{3} 4. Doesn't matter, it didn't deliver the results. 5. Tried is the key word , no results it doesn't matter 6. Immigration rates have risen the same amount throughout his term.{4} 7. DNC studies have shown America is less safe under the Bush administration.{5} 8. The last two years of his presidency had a terrible record, and the job rate slowed under his administration.{6} 9. This passes new regulations which hurt jobs. They attacked and hurt many gas companies.{7} 10. I give that to you. 11. No child left behind hurts children who learn at different levels and hurts overall education. Literacy rates as well as other education statistics have gone sour since its passage.{8} 12. Explain, too vague to refute 13. His trade policy Hirt us, helped china, and doubled trade deficits.{9} 14. Explain how this is good... 15. How? 16. How? 17. And the results where failure, trying is irrelevant 18. And the results where failure... 1. http://www.epi.org... 2. http://www.scu.edu... 3. http://en.wikipedia.org... 4. http://www.gcir.org... 5. http://www.buzzflash.org... 6. http://en.wikipedia.org... 7. http://yosemite.epa.gov... 8. http://www.therightsideoflearning.com... 9. http://www.epipolicycenter.org...
George bush was a good president

George Bush was one of america greatest leaders in American History he did many things 1. He passes massive tax relief for the american people because they needed and that setted off huge job growth for many years he greatly stimulated the economy 2. He freed Iraq took out a very bad man and leader 3. He greatly wiped out al queda and the taliban 4. He worked hard to stop the econmic collaspe 5. he tried to reform socil sercuirty and add life to it 6. he reformed immigration with more security at the border and guest worker program 7. he made america more safe 8. the econmy was booming under him 9. he passed the clean air act that cleaned the air 10. he reformed medicare making it better for millions of seniors with a prescription drug benefit 11. he passed the largest education reform act the no child left behind act 12. tried to create a ownership society 13. did many free trade agreements 14. did partial abortion act 15. restored honor and dignity 16. tried to get the united states off of foreign oil 17. worked well with democrats trying to fix finical cris 18. in 2003 tried to regulate freedie and franny mac
DDO should have a setting for no votes.

The short time I have been on DDO, I have been harassed, mocked and criticised for almost anything I do here, including what font I choose to use. So far I have 10 losses, and I'd say the majority of them undeserved. It's been my experience that voters here on DDO reward cheaters (people who break rules set up and agreed to in the first round). Also, many debates are not decided on by the content of the debates as much as other factors like campaigning friends to vote with bias. I will now give my examples of what I mean. Here is an example of a debate I should win, because my opponent broke the rules I set up in round 1. . http://www.debate.org...As you can see, I'm losing this debate and that's the major reason why I don't allow voting anymore. If I can't win a debate where the rules were broken, then forget the whole idea of voting. Here's another example of why I don't allow votes anymore:. http://www.debate.org...I declined the debate on the grounds that I was already debating that exact same thing with the exact same user. So instead of respecting my decline to debate, my opponent just went on "debating" and ignoring my decline. And the voters gave him a free win for such conduct. If that's what voters think is fair, there will be no more voting on my debates. . http://www.debate.org...My opponent in this debate has been asking me for debates over and over again. I was stupid enough to give him a chance, hoping he could act like an adult. Of course he ignored the rule "First round is for acceptance only"So the debate is now over and he lost his privilege to debate me. Fool me once. .. This is another perfect example of why I don't allow votes on debates. I'm sure stopping the debate after the first round would have gotten him flooded with unfair votes in his favor. Voters here tend to reward cheaters who break the rules. I would say this was a very satisfying debate because I learned:No-vote debates can give me the opportunity to test if somebody can really debate or just act foolish, without risking a loss. Even though I now have a loophole that lets me set the debates to block all voters, I still think DDO should consider this a standard option for all, because:1. I have shown that there are debaters that like the idea and find it less stressful and more fun.2. It's not the same as the discussions in the forums, since you still can have one on one debates with rounds.3. It eliminates cheating and unfair voting 100% of the time.4. Constructive criticism and further discussion can take place in the comment section. I truly don't see any drawbacks in having no-vote debates and I do see many advantages, most of all for the new users of DDO who get harassed and shown no respect. I'm not saying to get rid of voting completely, since many users enjoy it. I'm just asking for the option to have it. Without the loophole, I had to try to block as many voters as possible which still left 2 voters, out of thousands, that could vote on my debates. Now I have to ask, if DDO allows settings for 2 voters out of thousands, why can't we have settings for debates with none?
rap battle

You think your hot, but your not, cause I'm the man on the block, and you are the the sand in the clock, many are like you, most of em smell like poo, I smell like gold, 50,000,000 dolla gold im told, I don't want to brag but I have to, u aint half the man you think you are....FOO! AAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
rap battle

bro, u know it in your heart that i win, to try any longer, would be a sin. i dont want any bad blood in between us, while im rappin, u can stick to sellin kia's and dont worry it will be over soon like someone in a drag race....with a pontoon! im sorry, but i cant stop spitting these rhymes, u could probably do better working as a mime. as people look at this debate, they certainly see, how much u are a fake. ill give u a chance to walk away right now. Cause u just got finished.....POW!
rap battle

Bruh, u can't rap when ya drop the mic... But ill admit...u did pretty good...PSYCH!!!!! even when u have the mic, U rap like you are choking on spikes! Oh yeah, that's cool, u can count your abc's But can u count deeees..... I'm not even going to go there It just wouldn't be fair U tried to pull it in me But u would be better off on the show glee Why don't u take a lesson from the master... Heck, u would still be a disaster Ain't nobody fixin your rhymes They are so bad...it is a crime U might as well forfeit now Cause I would have better competition battling a cow GOT 'EM!!!!!!
rap battle

Man u know u can't rolled wit me.... I'm ridin in a Honda odyssey! Im killin U wit these fresh rhymes, My name is written all over the new York times! U can't avoid me, U can't run from me, Cause I'm a man makin a monopoly... On monstrosity! U try and stop me, U wish u could But I'm too busy...ballin in the hood! Cause I'm in the fast lane MOVE OVER TO THE MARGIN! ITS OVER WHEN I WALK IN! boom.
Send fat people to a government sponsored exercise camp

The first sentence is an ad hominem attack. You haven't explained to me how you're going to tackle the logistics of figuring out who is fat, transporting them, hiring guards, hiring trainers, and dealing with the general economic and emotional turmoil it would create. If we don't feed people for six months they won't be skinny - they'll be dead. Fat people don't become skinny by not eating, they become skinny by eating in the correct proportions. Even the skimpiest diet will cost millions of dollars for just one day. Also, you haven't explained how violating people's freedom and forcing them to be skinny will prevent them from just becoming fat again or how it will prevent others from becoming fat in the future or why we even need to force these people to go to this camp to being with.
Send fat people to a government sponsored exercise camp

I appreciate your attempt to try to contend with my superior intellect. Obviously you are perfectly content with keeping one of Americas biggest problems a problem. Fat people have not shown the willingness to not be fat anymore so we need to do it by force, food at the camp wont be expensive because we wont feed them(reason why they are there). After 6-12 months they will not be fat anymore and it will be a good time for the government to show off an efficient socialist example