Fascism is the best system of governance

"It appears that you're contradicting yourself. You say Fascism is for the people, yet you are willing to oppress and detain any citizen who opposes your rule, whether they be an intellectual or a common fool. Have you forgotten Albert Einstein--he who deliberately refused to return to Germany BECAUSE of Nazism?" Yes, Fascism is for the good of the people. Let it be understood that whatever system you have in place, it will be divisive. Take democracy for instance. In the US it is split between Democrat and Republican. In the UK it is split between Conservative and Labour, mainly. This is simply human nature. Not merely human nature, but nature itself. Opposition is an unavoidable part of life. It is how you deal with opposition that counts. In a democratic country, a parties efforts are largely distracted by trying to overcome their opponents critiques and by trying to discredit their opponent. It takes the form of smear campaigns and the pejorative use of the word politicking. What does this benefit a nation? In such a system you will always find a schism, with each sect having their own particular niche, their own particular selling points. With fascism, the government has full and total control and looks after the entire nation. None of this favouring sections of society and chasing a particular demographic. There is no need to specialise and thus limit the party since opposition is banned. The best way to deal with your opposition is to remove it entirely. Albert Einstein - one of the greatest minds to have ever lived, but he was a Jew. He would be given no quarter in Germany. Like I said, we can't discredit the system on the basis of the evils of its progenitors. It was unfortunate, but lets not throw the baby out with the bath water. The nazis were passionate about their own people. They mandated that they shall all be fit, healthy specimens for the sake of the people as a whole and they they shall all act and move and think as one, when it comes to their nationhood. They put the whole nation to work and did not let them rest on their laurels and pay them a salary to be unemployed, as they do in the UK. You should read Brauns biography. Of all the Nazi minds that the US poached, you will find that none of them really believed in National Socialism. Were the US just picky about which nazis they recruited? Or did they, after the fact, seek to rewrite their history? Braun put his name to the list because his political ideals were aligned with the Nazis, like many, many others. It simply wouldn't behoove the US to employ their former enemies of such an evil regime. So what was the impetus in recruiting them? Was it their brilliance first and foremost? Or was it that they were never really 'in to it'? Or was it serendipitously both at the same time? I think you'll find that utility comes first. Making it justifiable in the eyes of the public comes second. The Red Army were formidable alright. The second greatest force of WW2. So, if it was just the Nazis vs the Reds, I contend that the Nazis would have skipped through Stalingrad and conquered Moskva in no time. But, as it is, they were stretched on numerous fronts fighting all of the worlds superpowers. If those other resources were directed to the war against the Russians, it would be no contest. Your last paragraph did not make any sense. The good of the people isn't always the will of the people. It takes a noble and strong leadership to enforce the people against their will to do what is just and in their own best interests at times. But for one to win the people around to wanting to do what is best, there lies a demigod. Fascism, and in particular National Socialism, is the best form of government there can be.