The existence of the Judeo-Christian God is impossible

I'm glad to be facing Kohai on aanother topic, especially one in which I find great joy discussing. Note that my opponent shoulders the burden of proof as he is claiming the existence of the Christian God is impossible. Please excuse my very candid and straightforward responses. I had a term paper for class due so I went straight to the point :)Now onto evaluating his arguments. C1.1 Premise 4 is blatantly false. What if there were a being which, at the outset, provided every possible good for every creature. This being would be all-loving, but it doesn’t require that it have the ability to change. My opponent's But if there is one counter-example to 4, then 4 is wrong. Hence, 4 is wrong. C1.2 Premise 5 is wrong, because the Christian God exercised both his mercy and his justice in the person of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ, who is God incarnate, atoned for our sins by being a sacrifice; hence, God’s justice was exercised. But Jesus Christ, God incarnate, God’s only son, also was the one who offered himself as a sacrifice. This is an exercise in God’s perfect love. Maybe this is a problem for other monotheistic religions, but not for Christianity. Mercy and justice meet on the cross. C2 P1 is false, because though God may inspire men to write what he wants, that doesn’t mean that he will inspire every word they write. This is why, for example, some Christians believe the Bible is only absolutely true in regards to the most important doctrines of salvation, and not in areas of science or history. So from here it does not follow that God does not exist. P2 is false, for the same reason. Moreover, I’d argue that P3 is false, and that there are not contradictions in the Bible. Two important things to remember with regards to supposed Bible contradictions. First, dealing with these has to be ad hoc. Since we can’t prove across the board that all the supposed contradictions are merely apparent, we have to deal with them one by one. So we just have to take one at a time. Second, all we have to do is provide a logically possible explanation; it doesn’t even have to be particularly plausible. It just has to be possible, so that there is no necessary contradiction.. Who was Joseph's Father? It's important to have a background knowledge of the way genealogies work during these times. First, the genealogical lists would have been known by the Jews during Jesus' lifetime. David A. Duncan notes, "The easiest way for a Jewish enemy to discredit Jesus, was to show that he was not a son of David, and this could only be done by showing the genealogical records to either be wrong, or contradictory."[1] I'd also like to refer my opponent to the 1st source and take a look at the maps that dismiss the claims of there being a contradiction. There is more that can be said but I'm pressed with time and I'll wait until my opponent responds Who Killed Saul? With regards to Saul, the first interpretation A, that Saul committed suicide, is the correct way of understanding straightforwardly. B only refers to what the Amalekite said happened. If he were to actually quote the verses in C, then he would know that they only say the Philistines struck down Saul (which they did, if you look at 1 Sam 31:3), not killed him immediately. They critically injured him with arrows and he would have died whether he committed suicide or not. D doesn’t prove anything. We can interpret this as saying that God allowed Saul to die as punishment. This supposed “contradiction” is incredibly lame, and it’s easily done away with. There is no logical contradiction if we interpret it in this way. ConclusionI denied pemises in each of my opponent's arguments and demonstrated how they're plagued with falsity, therefore lending the entire argument unsound. I've shown that most of the apparent contradictions can be resolved and there are possible explanations that alleviate the claim of a contradiction. So far my opponent has not shown that it's impossible for the Christian God to exist. [1]http://www.bumby.org... [2] See for a further breakdown of the lineage http://www.custance.org...