For Religious people there is no Religious argument against homosexuality.

The resolution is: For Religious people there is no Religious argument against homosexuality. I would like to remind the readers that Pro has the full burden of showing there is no argument against homosexuality for the religious. I am Christian and will use the King James Version Bible, now known as the KJV. My task is to dismantle Pros argument and show there is an argument for homosexuality in the KJV. I think I should define homosexuality. Homosexuality is defined as: 1 : of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex. 2 : of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex. . http://www.merriam-webster.com......I do not think I need to define argument, I think it is clear enough it means in opposition of homosexuality. I will now offer verses supporting my argument. My first piece of evidence is Leviticus 20:13. My opponent has already mentioned this but used it as referring to straight people also. Well that would be incorrect. As we read it describes men lying with men as women. This can include any act a man would perform in the bed or in lying with a woman. This includes a host of thing as: Touching sexually, Penetration, Orally, and intimate kissing. "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. "My next verse will be in Romans 1:26-27"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. "We see that the women left their natural use to go against nature and then the next verse describes what use they were being unnatural in. It says likewise the men lusted for one another as did the women lust after one another. We see further that it lead to sexual intercourse and uses words as, vile, unnatural, unseemly, and an error. I think we can say this verse is in opposition against homosexual behavior in either way. This is also a New Testament verse and very relevant today. My next verse is in Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. "We see here it describes men with men and here it adds that it is an abomination. These verses should suffice for now. I will address my opponent now. "Alright with respect to the bible I have read it start to finish"It appears my opponent has missed some verses. "it compares adultery to being gay or cursing your mother and father as the same. "This is nonsense and my opponent needs to dig in more to convince us of that. "I would also like to ask you this question when did you become straight? "This is not part of the debate at hand but I will answer. When I hit puberty. "For someone to argue that god or the bible says something against religion they must also accept everything in the old testament. "This is anything but true. We can use the the Old Testament for reference and a guide but we are to follow the New Testament. I have given evidence supporting the Old with the New. "You kill your neighbor if they work on Sabbath day for one. But who knows maybe you have an argument that the bible says something I don't know about. "Indeed I do. Jesus Christ came and fulfilled the the Old Testament Law not making us accountable for it and gave us new Revelation in the New. I think this is a great start for this debate and I send it back to my opponent. Thanks.