Official Debate Tournament: Badger is a Retard/Troll

1) Debate RecordThat wasn't a confession of intentionally wasting people's time. I fail to see how you took that from how I said. How does getting distracted or getting drunk = intentionally wasting people's time? I mean when i get distracted and forfeit, i forfeit, wasting no time at all really? Well not with bad arguments anyway. And when i'm drunk? Well I don't write all that many arguements when i'm drunk. I wrote that fifa debate after a load of speed if i remember correctly. Regardless, you're coming to a rather unsubstantiated conclusion in just assuming i write all that stuff with the intention of wasting people's time.2) Badger's ProfileI fail to see how i'm clearly lying. And the llama is awesome!3) Quotes"The fact that Badger thought Rob was an anarcho capitalist in the first place is laughable. Rob has never said anything remotely capitalist and constantly complains about greed and corporations."Well if you'll read through that thread you'll see i was talking about capitalism as a bartering system rather than the complex economic system rob hates. I did come into this not having the first clue about anarcho capitalism really..."Badger doesn't address my argument that he's really really really stupid for thinking that currency REQUIRES a government. In fact, he goes on to describe why the value of commodities might allow them to become used as currency, defeating his own assertion that currency requires a government."Well you didn't make an argument? You just said i'm really stupid for thinking this. And i don't think currency requres government. I just wonder at its compatability with anarchism. I'm certainly thinking government would have to bring about complex economic systems though."The currency/Rob are examples of Badger saying something retarded and then flip-flopping on it 5 seconds later. This is consistent incoherence."Well i started operating under a different definition of capitalism there. A more sensible one i suppose. I flip-flopped on that comment i made about rob because i thought it incorrect operating under this new definition. Read the thread. I just seem like i'm learning there rather than being intentionally incoherent and moronic to waste people's time."Badger still doesn't seem to understand why minarchism and anarcho capitalism are different systems. The words "limited" and "no" mean different things. Badger does not understand what words mean."No I understand the concepts. I was just wondering at why you think it'd work and not be corrupted really. I was just wondering who'd print money or enforce its value. Though even besides that i see the ideology as a corruption in itself. Sieben's conclusionWell i contested that "fact" with saying that i really don't think i'm an idiot, so that'd be adequte argument against that past "i'm an idiot" comment, right? And that "big motherfvcking fortresses" comment was just me wondering about how "property rights" would be established without government. I've since supposed that property rights could exist in an anarcho capitalist world through it having come from government, but besides through unanimous decision or having a big motherfucking fortress on a spot i can't really see any other way in which they could've come about. Can you? :)