Wii U is the best games console of this generation

Regarding pro's first reason, it is something I covered in my opening argument. The mature titles released on the Wii U don't attract enough popularity to compete with the mature titles on the PlayStation 4 or Xbox One. I argued that the Wii U cannot be said to be the best of our generation for its focus it has on having primarily family friendly games. I made the case that the mature games children play have not been suitably shown through studies to have significant detrimental effects on their psychological and moral well being. In other words, the Wii U's focus on primarily having family friendly games is inconsequential from a moral standpoint, since there is no other reason to place precedence on this games choice. In any case, the age ratings exist to control which content minors can play. Regarding pro's second reason, I made the case that it is not something the other home consoles lack. Granted, there are more local multiplayer options on the Wii U, but just having different features or more of something does not elevate a console to be the best. If it's not producing enough sales to rival the other home consoles, it means more people want the other consoles and what they offer. That makes them the bigger business success and what more people enjoy. That is what makes something the best. It's the same with games, if more people buy games on other consoles, that means more profit for the business and more popularity for those games as opposed to their market rivals. Democratically speaking, if the majority of people prefer one game over another, then there is no reason to make a claim that the less popular game is better, unless you take a moral standpoint on the game's content, which, as I make claim, that there is nothing to denounce the more popular games being sold for the PlayStation 4, Xbox One, or even the Nintendo DS, which I've not touched upon yet--a fellow Nintendo family friendly console of this generation. We could sit here and scrutinise a game based on a number of criteria, but that is all of subjective importance. If a game is loved by much more people, then it is better. Regarding pro's third reason, the $50 and $100 price gap he quoted, or roughly, the 15% and 30% increase in cost for the Xbox One with one game and PlayStation 4 with one game, respectively is a point of appealing to the Wii U's cheaper cost that does not change anything in this argument. You can get a brand new Nintendo 3DS for cheaper than a brand new Wii U, and that has more popular games, more network activity on the servers and all the other things that make it a success over the Wii U; of course, the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One offer all of their own features and appeals in combination with their higher popularity and server activity which make them a success over the Wii U. Just because a console is cheaper, that does not mean it's worth losing out on everything the more successful consoles offer. Regarding pro's fourth reason, allow me to address that. The majority of people don't own gaming PC's with the specs required to play a lot of the high end games also offered on consoles. Furthermore console gaming is more beginner friendly and popular among casual gamers. In fact, the ability to play the same game on multiple consoles can offer mixed server options and, of course, offers more popularity for that game with players coming from their preferred console of choice. Nintendo's exclusives aren't that special when they don't sell. Pro seems to always be forgetting this massive point of the Wii U being a commercial failure. It's like he thinks the world must have gone mad to not have seen the same light he has with the Wii U. The existence of those titles in the Wii U's game-base didn't prove to be something that would cause a commercial victory in this generation yet. Of course, a great classic may get revamped once again, suddenly causing a never-before-seen high influx of console sales, but it is best to leave such far-fetched hypothetical possibilities to the realms of the impossible. Not enough people care about these exclusive titles, and their exclusivity certainly does not allude to these games being a higher class than other games. I'd like to see pro or anyone argue that one and successfully counter obvious issue of commercial failure. Sales is the only criteria that can be used to compare consoles or games without falling into a case of subjective appeal against subjective appeal. Regarding Pro's fifth and final reason, I can say that a lack of backwards compatibility is a shrewd business maneuver to allow people to keep playing the last generation of consoles and keep sales there. At the end of the day, pro didn't define his resolution. He didn't define best as being the best for the consumers or the best for the businesses, so there's no superiority in making an argument to support either. Of course, working with this I've tried to make cases why the Wii U cannot be said to be the best console of this generation in as many regards as possible. That is the only objective of my con stance. I rest my case.