God is an absolute and complete being, and re-incarnation can not be ignored on a rational basis.

I apologize for misunderstanding some of your arguments, but my thermodynamics argument still stands. Now I see that my opponent is trying to say that God is the source of all energy and that he does not have to pull energy out of nowhere. However, how did God get here? Pro says he is not created. So God came from nowhere, which means that there is energy from nowhere. The first law of thermodynamics states that matter/energy cannot be created nor can it be destroyed. The quantity of matter/energy remains the same. It can change from solid to liquid to gas to plasma and back again, but the total amount of matter/energy in the universe remains constant. [1] If Pro's statement is true, then the Universe must have existed forever, as God is not created so there is no start. However, there are many other ages the universe could be. Big Bang: 13.75 billion years [2] The Genesis: 6000 years None of those are forever. Therefore, God has to have a start. "It is important to note here, I do not advocate that, The Material Cosmic Manifestation, ie, The Universe, is God, totally, but rather I am trying to convey that the Material Cosmic Manifestation, The Universe, or Material energy, is simply just an expansion of Gods energy. This energy needs not be created by God, but instead can be retracted By God at will, or expanded, at will. " Pro has not given much proof on this so far. "That all the entire energy of the entire universe with all it's trillions and billions and sextillions, of galaxies, suns and stars, was once retracted into an area smaller than a proton. " Nope. It was in a singularity. [1] "A gravitational singularity or spacetime singularity is a location where the quantities that are used to measure the gravitational field become infinite in a way that does not depend on the coordinate system. These quantities are the scalar invariant curvatures of spacetime, which includes a measure of the density of matter. "[3] "So we can conclude from this, a universe that was once the size of a proton, that expanded into an infinite size and it's energy is neither created or destroyed, but also has the ability to manifest into an innumerable amount of various objects and life forms. Put simply, the one became many. " One did not become many. The universe was once compressed in a singularity, very dense, very hot. Then, it grows in size, eventually forming protons and other particles, which eventually formed helium and hydrogen nuclei, then it continues. [1] Plus, it might not be infinite size. It could be spherical, finite but with no boundary. Pro has not yet proven that God is a absolute being, and only said that it must be true because God shares some attributes with thermodynamics and the universe. This is a fallacy, as this only states that some attributes are shared, but that does not mean that Pro's argument is true. I'll give an analogy. 1. Chicken sandwiches are not ham sandwiches. 2. Tuna sandwiches are not ham sandwiches, either. 3. Therefore chicken sandwiches are tuna sandwiches. Notice how that is flawed? I await my opponent's response. [1]. http://www.allaboutscience.org... [2]. http://en.wikipedia.org... [3]. http://en.wikipedia.org...