All drugs should be Legalized

Thank you for clarifying who would be punished for the assisted suicide, although, this did not change anything I have posted about how that reasoning was illogical. I also noticed that for round 3 you did not attack my position for most of your argument, you added to your argument from round two.Now it is time for my summary. For this I shall be defending my position which has been stated in round 2 and I will wrap up. "Unless the United States does not pose a tax on drugs like we did on tobacco, the illegal drug dealers will still have the power they used to because they still sell for the same, cheaper prices." I unfortunately could not comprehend what you stated in this sentence. It appears to me you were attempting to say that without regulation for these drugs people could sell for the same price if not cheaper. I do not however see how this is an issue because you failed to explain how it would be. "Secondly, the legalization of drugs would hurt the generation of kids. Children who are born after the legalization would be more exposed to drugs, and therefore more people would be addicted."This is not attacking my factual evidence from round two, you have added to your argument from round two. Because of this I will instead attack this statement. You have stated that more people would be addicted to drugs if they were legalized which is incorrect as shown in the I graph provided from round two which examined drug use in Portugal after the legalization. Children are also already exposed to drugs since they are a large part of crime. This is also not nessicarilly a bad thing, sometimes being exposed to certain things is a good thing so that you will be ready for the real world which is harsher than it appears as a child. "Even if the children do not try drugs, studies have shown that drug use during pregnancy can lead to a decreased school results and unemployment when they grow up, which would cost the government money."You failed to provide the studies for that research but in this case I shall assume this is correct (and it most likely is). This does not combat the fact that the legalization of drug use would not increase drug use according to the graph I provided in round 2 that examined drug use in Portugal after the decriminalization of all drugs. These events are occurring currently and as of now drug use is still illegal. Overall making something illegal would not fix it. This disproves your statement. "many drug users would eventually go to the government for help when they have diseases such as psychoses or lung cancer" How do you know? Where is your proof of this? I have already explained that the legalization of drug use would not increase the use of drugs and even if it did, there would be a very slight increase. Drug users already have the ability to do this and I don't really understand the meaning of this statement either. Psychoses is also not a disease, it is a mental disorder. Psychoses due to hallucinogens is also only temporary. ( More on psychoses can be found on this website http://www.healthline.com... )Thank you for debating me, I have always wanted to debate this and I have learned a lot about this subject by doing so. Good luck!