God is real

The link you posted doesn't disagree with me. When an astronomer says "a little bit" that is generally millions of miles if not more. When Dr. Kaku says "a fraction of its distance. " That means millions of miles. Nowhere in there does it say 3 feet. If you listen closely you will see no real numbers were given. The Earth is 95 million miles give or take from the sun. A tiny fraction of this is millions of miles. You'll find no credible scientist that disagrees. Your link does not. Mutations are humanity's fault? Can you edit your own personal genes to assure your children won't have genetic defects? The defective rate amongst christians is also the same as other religions and the same as nonbelievers. You have no evidence to support the statement "Our DNA was once perfect and flawless. " All of science shows we have more humble origins. Please cite your evidence for this claim. Our eyes function horribly in comparison to the eyes of just about any bird. Our nose would be seen as a horrifying defect for any dog. Cats and bats laugh at our inability to see things in the dark as well as how poorly we hear. You have no points in your favor here. Evolution doesn't guarantee that our DNA magically always gets better. Mutations occur. The mutations that make us worse off will typically die more often than the mutations that make us better off. There are hundreds of thousands of years and many deaths through many generations and many horrifying mutations before humanity gets improvements. Your speculative opinion when you don't clearly understand what evolution is and the evidence for it is not evidence that disproves evolution. Do you think God faked all the fossils and skeletons we find that show mutations over time? There's no room in this argument for me to explain the four fundamental forces of nature, (Gravity, Electromagnetism, Strong and Weak nuclear forces) and I may not even be qualified to, But saying Time, Energy/Matter, And Space are fundamental forces or 'components' is extremely naive, And at best an oversimplification. To speculate that your one christian scientist holds all the definitive answers to the universe when no physicist would make the claim that we understand completely how the universe works is also a false claim. Neither you or I are qualified in a physics conversation, And it shows. "God is not bound by matter" You have no evidence to support this claim besides the Bible. You can't use the Bible to prove the Bible is true. I can write a book that confirms that it is true and write anything I want in it. "Every human on this planet will receive one death. This is due to the fact we are bound by time. " Medical science is advancing. It won't be all that long before we can sustain our lives permanently, Barring extreme injury or disease, And even those may be cured with time. There is nothing that makes us think otherwise. The human body dies due to degeneration rather than any death-bond with time. There's nothing specific about time that makes us die. It is the human body's inability to repair itself. People who die of "old age" aren't dying because they are old. It is typically organ failure, Lessening ability to fight off diseases, Et cetera. Time is not the cause of death. There is no reason to believe we will not be able to repair our bodies. The ability to live forever doesn't mean we're defying Time. It is our bodies that we are in war with. It makes no sense to say we die due to being "bound by time. " "God is not bound by time. " You have no evidence for this statement. "God is very powerful" is a perfectly fine statement. Doesn't prove his existence, But it is NOT omnipotence. Believing in omnipotence is simply illogical. You can't refute the statement I used to disprove it. You can say he is powerful but there is a number to it, However large. There is a limit. "You seem very unsure about everything. By there being so many theories just further proves that sceintists have absolutely no clue. Everything on this Earth points to a creator. " I am unsure about everything because I have insufficient evidence to prove one way or another. There are many theories, But they are all based on facts that we have 'proven. ' Scientists have plenty of clues. That doesn't mean we can definitively say what is true. My problem is you are NOT unsure. You claim to know all of this. You do not. No one does. A creator is a possible solution, No one denies this. You have no evidence to prove that it IS the solution. All you have done to prove your stance is say "Have a bit of faith. " While simultaneously saying "you are incapable of faith. " It is curious isn't it, That your God would create so many humans who don't value faith at all while simultaneously requiring them to have faith to reveal himself to them. It is curious that he made me, Supposedly, With absolutely no means of ever learning of him, Isn't it? If the inability to believe something with no evidence sends me to eternal punishment, Then it will have been God's own fault that I face eternal torment. You can't explain to me why he would do this. It is abhorrent. If he exists and requires faith to reveal himself and requires belief in him to avoid eternal damnation and he creates beings who put no value on faith he has doomed all of us before we exited our mother's wombs. This would make him immoral. I can't take your miracle remission scenario on faith alone. It seems if this story were true and it were actually a miracle it would have been confirmed and your churches would be publishing all the documentation of this case for everyone to see. It would convert many people and save them from eternal damnation. Why do you think your churches do not do so? If they do, By all means give me a link. You may well convince me to be Christian. All I really need is a bit of evidence. This is all atheists have ever asked for. If an explanation was given, Hopefully you don't wave the explanation away saying medical doctors have no idea what they're talking about. There's a reason you go to the hospital instead of praying when you are having a stroke or heart attack. If God can answer your prayers by not answering your prayers then there really is no evidence that would make you reconsider your position. I just hope you think of all the Christian women that prayed hard to not get raped and murdered where God answered their prayers by allowing their rapists and murderers to do what they will. Some rapists and murderers never being caught. If you think their prayers were sufficiently answered there is really not much I can say to dissuade you. God is perfect because you have defined him to be so, Not because reality shows it to be so. Maybe there is a 50th dimension chess going on here where allowing the rape of women, The starvation of children, And endless suffering around the world to go on is 'good. ' Maybe there is an argument for this. This is why God has explaining to do, Were he to exist. Until a sufficient argument is given to me, I cannot believe a good entity watches over us. Hopefully you understand the point of view. Do you think women who were murdered are stronger for it? People who contract MRSA infections? My wife will never run again. Is she stronger for it? She loved being able to move normally. Do you think children who are stumped due to malnutrition who eventually die of starvation are stronger for it? For all either of us knows, Maybe they are! Again, God would need to explain this to me. You have no argument to prove it is so. You are operating on faith and guesses. As we stated earlier, I have no faith. I was born with none. I value reality. I value saving women from being raped. I value feeding starving children. I value eliminating degeneration and disease. I value reducing human suffering. Nothing shows me your God values the same things. Why would I value him, Even if he did exist? He does not save women from fires. May your thoughts be clear, -Thoht