Theory: How the our universe came to be 3.0

#1. Multiverse Pro's theory fails to get off the ground; the Multiverse is a logical impossibility. It is a fundamental principle that whatever doesn't exist of logical necessity, must have been brought into existence by an act of free will. Since the particular constants supposedly governing the behavior of our universe (such as G, c, etc.) could theoretically be any value out of an infinite range of values, but they happen to be of a specific value which is not logically necessary, they must have been assigned the value they presently have by an act of free will. Those who refuse to accept this posit the multiverse; an infinite quantity of universes, each with different values for G, c, etc. The goal is that this way, the specifics of our particular universe can be explained as merely a random sampling of the infinite multiverse. However, this argument fails on two counts. First, because the multiverse is still part of the natural world, and actual infinities do not exist in the natural world. Second, the word 'universe' refers to all existing space and matter, which means the universe is the same as the multiverse, making the multiverse idea redundant and utterly useless for achieving the end it was created for. "must have been brought into existence by an act of free will" Your again suggesting the universe was created by god it seems, but, again, Problem of Evil, Omnipotence paradox, and where the hell did he come from. Where did this "free will" come to be. "Were going to stick to "our" universe, after exploring the imaginary space and find a rational explanation how the multiverse came to be i'll add it, but till then we should stick to our dimension, aka, universe." Please respect my guide lines, if one could give a theory of "god", then I see no difference between a multiverse besides logic, which is because god is illogical, and multiverse can be logical for it is connected by quantum physics, and if the black hole theory comes to be true the idea of a universe can create another universe also becomes logical. For all I know the step before a multiverse could be in fact a god, but were looking for the steps not the being who started it all, if there is a being that is. But till then, multiverse stays as a good logical explanation, which doesn't take the burdens that the answer "god" has, like who made this being, how does this being not have a beginning, if he doesn't have a beginning even though everything should have a beginning he becomes illogical. With multiverse its simple, This universe was created by another universe, which created by another etc... Compared to Eternal regression which says one being has existed for eternity, infinite regression goes by steps, but who knows it might have a true original starting point. There is some evidence that suggest a multiverse exist, quatom physics for example. http://www.space.com... http://www.scientificamerican.com... #2. A star collapsed into a black hole in one universe, leading to the creation of another universe. The concept of back holes is another logical impossibility. Black holes are singularities; they have infinite mass, and are predicted to exist solely on the basis of division by zero in the equations of General Relativity. A logical person must admit that once you get to this point, the model ceases to be an accurate representation of reality, but the philosophically naive person insists that reality must conform to the zero he has written under his division bar. Even Stephen Hawking has abandoned the notion that Black Holes are real.[1] We have observed black holes, therefor, though we can't find an accurate explanation for it, we can only proceed with the fact they exist. The Big Bang is a theory of a singularity exploding making a ever expanding universe, a black hole is a theory of a singularity forever contracting. What if these singularities are one in the same. "For every action force there is an equal, but opposite, reaction force" Sir Isaac Newtons laws of motion http://hubblesite.org... #3. Space ripped into the unknown spaces between dimensions. This doesn't make sense. Space can't rip into space. I'm done for now, and I look forward to Pro supporting his case and dealing with my objections. I might have been unclear, so I can understand this confusion. Imagine you have two water balloons, when I speak of a "space rip" i'm referring to when a dimensions edge , like a balloon, gets "punctured" causing a leak, per-say, in the space between the balloons. Balloons = Universes space in between balloons = nothingness/void puncture/leak = space rip "This doesn't make sense. Space can't rip into space." If I poke a hole in a water balloon the space(water) inside said balloon does not leak out?? Really the space in between universes is more like nothingness, which goes into imaginary space philosophy, which I would prefer not to go into detail on how the imaginary space works. "There is no escape from a black hole in classical theory, but quantum theory enables energy and information to escape." -Steven Hawking Define escape : troll face: it could be this energy, particles, and information simply escapes to another universe O.o, Mind Blown. 4. Due to everything have a polar opposite the collapse into a single point, ripping the space fabric, causing the inverse of collapsing to a singular point in one dimension making a big bang in another creating the space later becoming a universe. 5. The violence of spilling threw this space rip causes the particles that were ripped apart when pulled into the black hole to collide into each other forming the first elements of this new universe, like particle acceleration. Believe it or not but the black hole theory I have more or less explains most of the issues pointed out by this article you have listed. What is funny is how everyone ignores Sir Isaac Newtons laws of motion when it comes to black holes, my theory simply shows that this "infinitely dense" black hole isn't really dense but a hole into the original point of a universe which is infinitely expanding. Everything has a inverse reaction, it just so happens this inverse is a universe's big bang caused by said black hole. [1]http://www.nature.com...... Conclusion: #1 If multiverse is a logical impossibility so is god due to contradiction, yet multiverse becomes logical if a black hole can create a universe. #2 this argument is stating due mathematics failure to explain black holes, black holes just don't exist which is logically impossible for we observe them #3 I was sorry for your confusion on what I meant by "space rip" so I went into more detail, "This doesn't make sense. Space can't rip into space.", Space: the dimensions of height, depth, and width within which all things exist and move. Ill give another example for this again, You live in a room correct? that is space outside that door is more space.which is the home you live in. And outside that door is the world, which is more space. And outside the earth is more space. Outside the solar system's space is even more space... Etc... When one separates space away from itself it become a unique space if the nothingness that lays outside the universes its the entirety of space, then a universe is simply a room in that space. So if one "room" opens a door into the nothingness space, then that would be more or less a space rip for the boundary between nothingness and the universe's space is nullified due to the door being opened. But that may just confuse you so I refer to the water balloon example.