The Christian God is more likely to exist than Pagan Gods

O Introduction Now a certain person whom I won't mention directly (does anyone else feel like eating Kentucky fried chicken ?) has noticed that I have forfeited round two and so has my opponent. It is obligatory to forfeit one round in this debate as stated in round one "We both need rest, hence both of us are required (not optional) to forfeit one round.". With that out of the way, lets begin. O Observations 1. My questions were not answered. O Arguments for Zeus My opponent has none. O Arguments for the Christian God It seems my opponent thinks that I make stuff up as I go. o The Resurrection http://www.thedevineevidence.com... http://www.bethinking.org... http://apologetics.blip.tv... http://tektonics.org... http://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk... http://www.gotquestions.org... Jesus obviously existed nor is he a combination of other myths as some would want one to think. The fact is just like the claims of the Da Vinci Code: http://www.religioustolerance.org... Likewise the claim that Jesus never existed is not supported by most scholars because its frankly a silly idea. My opponent has ample of time and space to prove me wrong. I do not recommend my opponent to make this section an argument of Jesus existence. "Moreover, even if all you say is legitimate" Why do I have a feeling that you knew I would prove this ? The alternative ? I ask my opponent to provide an alternative explanation when one considers the evidence I provided. "the sources are incorrect or the 'witnesses' were mistaken" That is not a proper response, please go through every single fact I provided and show me a more plausible explanation. "If you are going to argue that Jesus existed based on prophecy, then all of these things that I just mentioned blow that argument out of the water." When did I say that? "Was Jesus' tomb empty? Who knows. No one knows for sure. What happened? No one knows for sure" I can't believe you just said that. Ill just quote what I previously said: ". It would have been impossible for faith in His resurrection to take root in Jerusalem while His body was still in the tomb where the Sanhedrin could exhume it, put it on public display, and thereby expose the hoax. Some crazy explanations have been made and I think this will be no exception." (Gary Habermas did a study on the state of scholarship to date. He reports that 75% of scholars agree that the tomb was indeed found empty) In conclusion my opponent evaded my arguments. o Jesus was prophesied by the O.T. Again, my opponent has evaded my arguments. What should I do ? 1. There are many prophecies Jesus did fulfill as I showed. 2. I knew my opponent will say: "Moreover, Jesus was supposed to do many things that was prophesied in the O.T. that he did not do (like rebuilding the Temple or bringing all Jews back to their homeland). Also, if you contend that this will happen in the 2nd coming..The O.T. mentions nothing of the second coming." So I said this beforehand: "Officially there are 3 resolutions: 1. There are two messiahs 2. There is one Messiah but the prophecies will be fulfilled at different times. 3. The prophecy is conditional." In conclusion it feels strange to be ignored.