Libertarians should find a new leader to advocate there views

Well it seems my opponent has forfieted, He appologised but did not say what happened. I can guess though he had a busy weekend like I did. I thank him for contacting me though about the forfeit as that means he has greater honor than most of the members on the site that forfiet there debates and never post again. This is because when you make a commitment it is a matter of honor that you do all you can to keep it and you say something when you prevented from getting your debate in on time for whatever reason.Prospective future members thinking about joining this site to start a debate or accapt one that are skiming through this debate on this sight right now after discovering it I want to you to read this..... your honor is a stake when you start something. it does not matter that this sight is not the center of your world or you have a so-called-life, or your just thinking about doing one debate for fun or a school assignment. you start something you need to finish it. there is a three day period between rounds most of the time its not hard to keep up with most the time, and it is ruder than troll killing a debate to just quite and leave your oppoenent hanging without a word.because my opponent does have honor though he didint leave me without a word and any who are skiming his past debates to see if he is prone to forfiet before accapting his debate challenges I want you to not hold this one against him since he did have the honor to contact me after the forfiet. This shows that he does not quit out of apathy toward a debate topic, its just when stuff happens sometimes.That out of the way this is the final round and I have no case persented by my opponent in the form of rebutal or further points to contend. So I will just leave off with a few concluding thoughts.I made the debate specifically hopeing to shine light on the seriousness of not having a sucessfull record should have on a canadite even from the perspective of there own supporters.and while we have been left with good cases made that he should still be activly speaking out for his views on 'liberty' its still safe to say what the resolution says, that he should basically be replaced.That sounds kind of heartless and as if it sugest he should not actively speak out no more but this is not the case with politics when I speak of 'replaceing' someone as the key head figure.Sarah Palin still speaks out for Tea Party core conservative values but we would be kidding outselves if we say she hasnt been replaced as key media figurehead for the movement. she kind of was early on as it was shortly after her failed presidential bid and there was still a lot of lingering support for her as a leader. But that has pretty much all gone by now with her not running again and people like michel bachman who actually did run.Palin is actually a perfect example of what I have tried to say with this debate. she's not really the key figurehead of whatever you want to lable her political views as though she kind of was at one time. she still speakes out but the Tea Party movement has benifited from attaintion moving away from her and more to other people advocating conservative views and approaches different from Obamas such as Paul Ryan who seems to archatect anything that actual gets talked about in congress or the various charismatic people that have ran in the GOP primary. More people taking such a central role in carrying the torch of a side in politics helps keep it alive and growing espically when some of the first become 'damaged goods' like Palin in how the media jumps on her for non-issue related things like knowledge of history and things like that. when its not carried on to other leaders people could start just throwing what her positions were out the window with a 'well that was just her and you know she wasnt very bright'. but anyone can see its not just her and people like Paul Ryan, Tom Cobern, Chris Christy, Bob Mcdonald, Bobby Jindal, or Rick Santorum, cannot all be just discounted as 'stupid'.The comments in the comment section of this debate actually testify that not everyone even cosiders Ron Paul a real libitarian, but as of now he is the only guy put up to the plate in presidential primaryies. Its time to cycle through to someone else just like it was time to cylce away from sara palin. people try and discount paul because he is zany or has trouble articulating his case in debates, kind of stammers or goes off topic, or is a much older man, why not try his son out for a change, why not serch for another libitarian who does articulate the cause better (or differently and just see if it works better)Those of you that support Ron Paul, one day whether anyone likes it or not Ron Paul will 'burn out' from the political game or from spending so much money on campaigning or for health or family reasons and retire, or he will just flat out die one day (that also happens to everybody eventually) and if the fire is not passed on to someone else before it burns out in him, then it dies with him and what he has started will have to start again as if from scratch. From my own life experiences I know thats true, that the torch must be passed by lighting anothers torch befor the first one burns out. I have seen people try to get apprentaces in my familey to pick up what they themselves have already quite long ago and it has never has worked out for them.