After/Assuming this debate concludes, the contender ought to go out on a date with Logical-Master

Alright, I'll go first. CONTENTION #1: First, I'd like to point out that Yraelz is more likely than not heterosexual. My basis for this claim is rather clear and conclusive and doesn't simply rely on the fact that Yraelz classifies himself as someone who is interested in women in his debate.org profile Exhibit A: http://www.debate.org... Exhibit B: http://www.debate.org... Exhibit C: http://www.debate.org... Exhibit D: Facebook. First, we must note that in the Exhibit A, Yraelz presents clear and concise reasons for why he isn't gay in spite of the fact that this wasn't necessary to win the aforementioned debate. In Exhibit B, Yraelz informs the user known as "solo" that he deleted his previous account which went by the name "Yrael" because it was involved in an impossible to win debate. In Exhibit C, we find out that the "impossible to win" debate topic concerned whether or not he was gay (why would a topic that was simply confirming his so-called "homosexuality" be impossible for him to win? I'll elaborate more on this in the next round if necessary). Finally, there is the matter of Yraelz's facebook. Recently, I decided to send a friend request to Yraelz on facebook so that I could confirm whether or not he was heterosexual on his facebook page. Yraelz promptly accepted me on his list and I was quickly able to determine for myself that he is involved with a women in a romantic relationship (coincidentally, his sexual preferences here match his sexual preferences listed on facebook as well) through simple observation. Ergo, given all of these facts, it is quite clear that Yraelz is more likely than not heterosexual. CONTENTION #2: Neither of us know enough about the other. The most mostly anyone on this site knows about me is that I like to debate, am a nerd, can please a woman, play video games, and that I . . . like anime. However, even with this knowledge, there is not enough to get a good grasp of my personality. Thus, I challenge my opponent to prove he has a good grasp of my personality as well as why mine would mesh would his. If he does not do this, then you have little reason to vote PRO, ladies and gentleman. CONTENTION #3: Yraelz lives in Montana whereas I live in Tennessee. Simply driving that far just to meet up with some random sophist nut case from debate.org is highly injudicious as he certainly doesn't have enough information to know the kind of person he'd be dating. This could in turn lead to a very pathetic date. CONTENTION #4: I could very well be 30 year old child molester or a serial killer. This speaks for itself and shall be elaborated on later depending on what PRO says. CONTENTION: #5. I don't like mudkipz. ;) CONTENTION 6: Yraelz makes it quite clear that I am dead to him, as noted on this wall: http://www.debate.org... "Music is dead to you.......? You're dead to me!" Does this sound like the kind of attitude someone has against someone who'd they be willing to go on a date with? My thoughts exactly. CONTENTION 7: As noted in this debate, I am annoying and obnoxious: http://www.debate.org... Sure, 2/3 of that guys argument doesn't hold water, but the one about me making THIS debate is right on the money as it is indeed most annoying and obnoxious to make a debate concerning whether or not anyone will go on a date with me while using a serious debate site such as this. Hell, it's bordenline spamming. Surely one shouldn't date someone who is annoying and obnoxious (which I'll explain moreso in the next round and will also provide more evidence that I am annoying and obnoxious). Finally, I have a suspicion about what tactics my opponent intends to employ in this debate, thus, I'll place two cards face down and end my turn. END OF CON R2