Resolved: The Christian god most likely doesn't exist.

DefenseD1: Problem of Evil There are two problems with my opponnet's rebuttel. 1) If god is all-powerful and he can't do something, then he is not all-powerful. And by definition the Biblical god is impossible.2) He puts a lot of importance on free will. Now, I will use sleep as an example of why free will can't refute my first conention. The average person sleeps for five hours each day (doctors agree that 7 and 8 hours is the healthier way to go but 5 is the average. ). Now I know what your probably thinking right now:" What does sleep have to do with Gods existence". Well. .. it doesn't however, it does contradict this whole notion that "God treasures free will so much even though costs trillions of people their lives". Now the point is that the average human will sleep 90,000 hours in his/hers life time. Now, if the biblical god really existed and actually treasured our free will the he would have designed us without the need for sleep because that's 90,000 hours that people can't exercise their free will. D2: Contradictions within the BibleE1: My opponent states that the reason that Israel couldn't get the land was because it may (key word) not have been part of the land that God told them they could have. However, the Jezreel Valley was part of The Land of Canaan (Numbers 34:1-12) [1]. So, if this god really could do anything, and didn't then this means he didn't pay up the whole of the land that he promised and is a lier. So it's either he couldn't do anything or he's not all-good. E2: The verse before 2 Sam. 6:23 do not say anything about her not having babies with David. It merely has what I stated in context. The woman had no children, while later on it says that she had children. It contradicts itself. E3: I will concede this part. Additional errors in the BibleE4: In Leviticus 11:6 it says: "The rabbit, though it chews the cud, does not have a split hoof. .. ", Now this is kind of crazy because, Rabbits don't chew their cud [2]. E5: In Genesis 3:14 it reads: " So the Lord God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, . .. You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust. .. ", this is also crazty because snakes don't eat dirt [3]. E6: Also there is conflict between both of the testaments on the case of the death penalty. Now I do realize that most Christians (and most likely my opponent) will state that they are two seperate laws. However, the problem with this is if God were two set moral rights and wrongs, then how would something that is totally moral become immoral? It can't. So with this being said I will state my last error. The Bible states in Exodus 21:12: " Anyone who strikes a man and kills him shall surely be put to death. " While in Mathew as well as romans it states: " Do not repay any one evil for evil. " (Romans 12:17, Matthew 5:39). <--- This is a clear contradiction within the only real text that speaks of th biblical god. D3: Science proves Bible wrong! I would like to point out that not one of my opponent's sources is actually scientific and they are all biased. Also, I don't even see a source for the reuttel of my third contention. Something with no proof can't be taken seriously. My opponent states that the fossil record shows signs of rapid burial. However, this little speck of evidence can't even come close to touching on this. The problem with the "Flood Geology" that my opponent is trying to put forth is that this doesn't really prove that it was caused by a flood. If a flood did happen, then the animals would have been buried in assorted strata and mixed everywhere. However, they are in the right order for evolution [4]. There are additional proofs against the flood. I will point them out through questions my opponent must answer. Q1: Why do small organisms dominate the lower strata, whereas fluid mechanics says they would sink slower and thus end up in upper strata? Q2: Why no human artifacts are found except in the very uppermost strata. If, at the time of the Flood, the earth was overpopulated by people with technology for shipbuilding, why were none of their tools or buildings mixed with trilobite or dinosaur fossils? Q3: Why are different parts of the same organisms are sorted together. Pollen and spores are found in association with the trunks, leaves, branches, and roots produced by the same plants? [5]Additional Contention: Argument from Imperfection. P1: If a perfect god is to exist, then his creation must also be perfect. P2: His 'creation' is not perfect. C: Therefore, a perfect god can't exist. If the biblical god is to be a all-loving god then he can't make us imperfect. If he does then he is not being all-loving. Also, if a perfect god were perfect everything it does would have to be perfect (including designing us and other things such as the universe). However, there are imperfection in humans, animals, and even the universe itself. We are prone to exhaustion, we are prone to diseases that our imperfect immune system can't fight off, and there are problems with our own solar system [6]. In response to my opponents claims of bad conduct:The problem with my opponent calling me in for bad conduct for stating an extra contention is rather stupid (I did not call him stupid but rather his actions). We only had had one rule pertaining to extra arguments and that is, " no arguments in the last round". I haven't broken that rule or any of the other rules or disrespected my opponent or the voters. I have not done anything that shows bad conduct. I will only state my conclusion in the last round. I will wait for my opponents response. Thank You. [1]. http://www.israel-a-history-of.com...[2]http://en.wikipedia.org...[3]http://en.wikipedia.org...[4]http://www.agiweb.org...[5]http://www.talkorigins.org...[6]http://adsabs.harvard.edu...