Is Jesus the Son of God in a literal sense or in a figuratively way

First I have to state that Prophets in Islam are sinless, they can make mistakes like normal human beings, but cannot do things which God forbade like drinking wine, or gambling, I will present a decisive rebuttal.Isaiah and Matthew:"Your confusing the heavenly Father with Jesus, sus is thr everlasting Father in Matthew 1:23 and in Isaiah. Jesus is from the father which is everlasting so this is why they call Jesus the everlasting father and the Heavenly Father the Heavenly Father."Matthew 1:23 says that following: 23 “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” (which means “God with us”).Isaiah 7:14 "14 Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel."Seems a Prophecy fullfilled, here is 2 ways I can refute this, before I do, Matthew 1:23 does not say Jesus came from the father, so Pro was confused, nor It says Jesus is everlasting.1) Jesus was not named Immanuel, as said by matthew himself in 1:25 "25 But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus."Matthew is contradiciting himself, lets examine Isaiah 7:14.2)Context of Isaiah 7 is the following(I have made it concise) :" 10 Again the Lord spoke to Ahaz, 11 “Ask the Lord your God for a sign, whether in the deepest depths or in the highest heights.” 12 But Ahaz said, “I will not ask; I will not put the Lord to the test.” 13 Then Isaiah said, “Hear now, you house of David! Is it not enough to try the patience of humans? Will you try the patience of my God also? 14 Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin[d] will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel." This is a sign from the Lord to Ahaz, therefore Matthew was mistaken in 1:23, and 'The virgin' was supposed to be a 'young woman', because it also means that according to the footnote of the NIV.D. Isaiah 7:14 'Or a young woman' [1][1]http://www.biblegateway.com...Proverbs 30:4I have showed you some of the passage with the context "4 Who has gone up to heaven and come down?Whose hands have gathered up the wind? Who has wrapped up the waters in a cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and what is the name of his son? Surely you know!"I have told you that Jesus did not do the above which going down from the heaven, gathering the wind,etc, therefore it is not Jesus being described here, it is sayings of Agur the son of Jakeh.(Proverbs 30:1)John 1:Pro thinks John was the disciple of Jesus when he isnt because his Gospel was written 90-100 years after Jesus,[1] therefore he is not the disciple, but another man, John in 19:36-37 says that the previous scripture say that Jesus will not be crucified but others say that he will, I extend my argument that, these are the words of John not Jesus.[1]http://en.wikipedia.org...On the issue of Ahaz, as I explained above, Lord was speaking to Ahaz, and according to the NIV, young woman is better.Pro talks about superman and stuff, It is hardly understandable, I wish he could make less spelling mistakes and make his speech clear.I will summarize what he is saying:Jesus was secretly named Emanuel.How did he know the above, I do not know, maybe Pro is secretly working with Jesus and knew his real name, his argument is fallacious.Isaiah 7:14 :RSVTherefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, a young woman shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Imman'u-el. Catholic; NJB The Lord will give you a sign in any case: It is this: the young woman is with child and will give birth to a son whom she will call Immanuel NEBTherefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign: A young woman is with child, and she will bear a son, and will call him Immanuel.Even the Jews translate it as young woman:Therefore the L-rd Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and you [or, she] shall call his name Immanuel. Rabbi Tovia Singer explains this:http://www.outreachjudaism.org..."In fact, although Isaiah used the Hebrew word almah only one time in his entire corpus (7:14), the prophet uses this word virgin (betulah) five times throughout the book of Isaiah (23:4; 23:12; 37:22; 47:1; 62:5)."Matthew was mistaken.Jesus sinner:Pro has failed to rebutt my argument on Jesus being tempted, but insted states this:"So Jesus just showed they are sinners jesus is sinless to help the sinners."I can help sinners to leave their sins does that mean I am sinless? nope, Pro is invalid.Jesus sinned according to the BIBLE NOT THE QUR'AN.Conduct of Pro:This is a debate on whether Jesus is the son of God figurative or not, but as seen from Pro he insults and makes fun of my Prophet as said in:"Now before you read this hadith loom how muhammad couldn't find sin to blame on jesus but he just says Jesus isn't fit for intercepting for sin but the rest of the prophets he picked a sin out." And even made a false statement 'but the rest of prophets he picked a sin out' which is false, In Islam Prophets are sinless in a sense that they do not do what God has forbade, and they fulfill the message of God, to their selected nation(except for Muhammad pbuh), but Prophets make mistakes.Another thing Pro did is use the Qur'an and Hadith, I do not believe Jesus sinned, but your bible does as he was tempted by the devil, therefore do not go off topic, he used the Qur'an and Hadith to go off topic.Interpolations in the Bibles, that made people think Jesus is the literal Son of God:Let us examine some verses of the Bibles, to prove that Jesus being a literal Son of God wrong.KJV JOHN 3:16 "16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." KJV was made in 1611 [1]Let us see a modern Bible like NIV:"16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life."KJV 1 JOHN 4:9 "9 In this the love of God was manifested toward us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through Him. "NIV:"9 This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him."These are two examples of how the Bible has been interpolated, the make the blessed Jesus(God forbid) begotten or literal Son of God.I have gathered a good rebuttal and an argument to show Jesus is not literal son of God, but interpolated as.[1]http://en.wikipedia.org...