Resolved: Disney buying out LucasFilms is more positive than negative

I actually have a limited amount of time to post my arguments. So mine will be short as well. They also won't be proofread or use any Html code. Since I'm on an Iphone that means no bold. I hope that it's easy to read and easily comprehended. "Now, this one should be obvious. Disney buys Lucasfilm, and can continue and/or reboot several different franchises and movies, such as Labyrinth, Indiana Jones, and Star Wars, leading to them earning quite a lot of money. Not eally any negatives here, onto Lucasfilm." That is a negative for the fans. George Lucas will be given a role as the executive producer on Star Wars, which has a lot more creative control than the director many times. He's also going to have a hand in every part of the creative process. George Lucas is 67 years old and out of touch. Fans of Star Wars hated episode 1. Lucas inserted that annoying Jar Jar Binks character among many other missteps. There going to completely water down and destroy the Star Wars universe. They are plan on releasing a show, rushing out 3 new Star Wars films, starting a theme park etc. http://www.forbes.com... Disney has a lot of incentive to keep Walt Disney's (AKA Hitler's http://www.debate.org...) original creative work sacred. There's no such incentive with Star Wars. The best thing the CEO can do to keep his job and get a huge raise is; rush out a new trilogy extremely quick, remake the original trilogy, insert a bunch of new characters into all these films to increase how many toys they can sell, and start a stupid mini theme park. This would bring disney billions of dollars extremely quickly making the CEO look like a genius, while also destroying Star Wars. Once the current generations of fans die and the new blood sees the watered down stuff first, and doesn't give the old trilogy a chance. The franchise will be discarded like an old prostitute. Remakes of Labrynth are likely to be like remakes of Robocop. Everybody has fond memories of the original film, but it has no cult following. This means the movie has to stand on it's own merit an can't use the previous incarnation to bootstrap sales with. People are tired of the Indiana Jones crap. http://thedailycougar.com... Indiana Jones was thrown out in an attempt to cash in on it's predecessors success. They couldn't manage to make a good film out of it. This is what's going to happen to Star Wars. A bunch of sequals will be spit out to get an easy fast profit and the franchise will be destroyed before Lucas is old enough to see his grave. I'd like to point out, the comparisons to Marvel aren't fair. Marvel's fans are created in the comic book store. Disney can screw up several times and the fan base doesn't care, because the comics are still good. If the comics started to suck, they then lose all that consistent revenue. If you look the films released by Marvel they're sub par. They're extremely mediocre and the fans know it. They don't care, because the comics are awesome. Part of the reason comic fans go to see these movies is so they can complain about how the movie sucked. Look at Iron Man 3, both Thor movies and the Spider-Man reboot. Fans hate those movies, but they can't help themselves. The Lucas franchise doesn't have the same type of fan base. Their fan base is created in the theatre. Once they start putting these subpar movies in theaters their fan base will start eroding. The original fans that are remaining will stop paying to watch these movies in protest of where the franchise is headed. Sure disney sees some short term benefit to milking Star Wars for all it's worth, but they screw over the fans and they screw over the original creators, it's probably even a long term negative financially for Lucas and Disney, but what do they care they'll be dead before the negativity rebounds and hits them in the face.