Evolution is true

MutationsCon claims that mutations can only cause a loss of information, not a gain. That is blatantly false. Increase of genetic material has been observed. Increase of genetic variety has been observed. Novel genetic material has been observed. Novel genetically-regulated abilities has been observed.[1] Increase of genetical material increases information because genetic material conveys information.Con also claims that if an amoeba has to evolve into humans, it will have to increase genetic information. False again. The amoeba genome has 670,000,000,000 base pairs,while the human genome has 2,900,000,000. [2] Amoebas do not have to increase genetic information to evolve.Transitional fossilsCon says that there are only a handful of transitional fossils and they are all refuted. But it is not just a handful. Transitional fossils between different Phacops ? Transitional fossils of coiled oysters changing shape? [3] Tons of transitional fossils between dinosaurs and birds? [4] Transitional fossils documenting the evolution from a kind of mammal to whales? [5] 6 examples of transitional fossils that document the evolution between fish and tetrapods? [6]The very common fossils of Rhizosolenia , which shows a speciation event? [3]You can't call all this, discovered by tons of people around the world, just a handful of lies, right?Speciation"The effect of natural selection and mutations over time may increase diversity around the globe, but at the cost of reducing the genetic information in each individual—the opposite of what Darwinian evolution would require."See my refutation on mutations."Such examples of “rapid” speciation show that the diversity of life we see today is possible given the original created kinds (with representatives on board the Ark) and the elapsed time since the Flood."The Bible said that animals were created in their present form."The speciation we observe never transforms a fish into a lizard, for example, or a lizard into a bird; fish remain fish, lizards remain lizards, and birds remain birds. We see a fixity and separation of kinds even though there are minor, information-reducing changes within kinds. Also, successful hybridization (between two different “species”) reminds us of the existence of underlying kinds."Evolution never said that fish can suddenly turn into lizards. That is a complete strawman: Evolution is gradual, unlike the creationist interpretation of cats turning into dogs. As for the reduction of information, see my rebuttal on mutations. "Evolution, in the particles-to-people sense, is not observed."Another invalid point. Amoeba-to-people is entirely possible, even with only the decrease of information. (see my arguments on mutations) , while particles-to-people is abiogenesis, the creation of organisms from non living material. It is another topic. It is not observed=/= not true. I have provided scientific evidence and observed speciation,such as ones that have enough evidence to say that it is speciation. (Rhagoletis pomonella)[7] As speciation, or macro evolution, has been observed and information adding mutations and beneficial mutations are confirmed, evolution is true. [1]http://www.talkorigins.org...[2]www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmUGJ3Jh7fc[3]http://www.talkorigins.org...[4]http://www.talkorigins.org...[5]http://www.talkorigins.org...[6]http://www.talkorigins.org...[7]http://www.talkorigins.org...