The Star Wars Prequels are better than the Star Wars Original Trilogy

I know a lot of people find it unbelievable that somebody might say the prequels were better than the original trilogy, but I feel like it is important to have this debate, because it we all want the best of star wars in the next movies. I will admit there some problems, but I also think episode 4-6 had a lot of problems too. The only reason why those problems are not addressed is because Star Wars had the advantage of being a Galactic movie. The movies also had great music, and is defended by nostalgia. I think that people made the mistake of thinking they were going to see the same thing again when the prequels came, but they didn't. Story: The story in the prequels is better than the original trilogy, because it feels more real. This statement might want to make a lot of people kill me, but hear me out. The plot is about a young Jedi Anakin who eventually turns into the iconic Darth Vader. This story is about a good person turning into something evil. You don't find this kind of story in movies. In most movies, the villain is born evil, and you have to accept it. Darth Vader in episode 4-6 is portrayed as evil. You could never guess he was a Jedi until he told Luke he was his father in the end of episode 5. This is why this story was more real. It is something that could happen in our world. Anakin turns desperate when he has visions of his wife is dyindg. Anakin also is not even supposed to have a wife, because the Jedi Order forbids marriage which makes it harder for Anakin to cope with his emotions. The emperor(currently chancellor) finds the perfect moment to lure Anakin into the dark side of the force. This is something that can happen in real life which makes Star Wars more believable. It tells a story of good men turning bad. It also has some good political science in it too. The chancellor convinces the Queen of Nebu that the politicians in the republic are corrupt. But, if you really start thinking about it. He is right. The bureaucrats in this world and in our world are corrupt to an extent. Palpatine wants to bring real action into the republic, and runs for chancellor. In episode 3, note he sees good and evil as a point of view. Palpatine could also very well be seeing himself doing the right thing. Also, the Jedi which appear always to be right while the Sith are always evil seem to also do some unethical things. They ask Anakin to spy on the chancellor. Is this something that should happen in the Republic? Is Palpatine right when he says there needs to be more order, and less bickering. I am sure you can argue about how I am terribly wrong, but a good story can make you argue about the plot. A good mythology can create good analogies from our world to their world. Moving on to the original trilogy. I don't see why people like these movies, and I am sure more and more young people(millennials) will agree with me on this. Episode 4-6 are kind of like black and white movies. They were original, but its just that people keep repeating what that original did. Episode 4-6 offered nothing that I was talking about in the prequels. My only problem with the original trilogy is that the plot feels completely unnecessary. Why would you revolt against a billion storm troopers with a lot better equipment than you? It is unrealistic. Luke Skywalker is annoying. I was talking earlier about how people forget the errors because it is their childhood memories. Luke is a brat to his parents. He begs them to get him the droids. He begs for adventure. When he is faced with adventure, he gets scared. Anakin is just acting like Luke. I don't get why audiences hate Anakin, but love Luke whenever he is annoying. It is also extremely clique sometimes. Darth Vader is always evil. He does a good job at it, but he is always evil. So are the other characters. Our main characters have a perfect moral compass. How realistic? They never have faults in their characters. They all want to do the right thing. Harrison Ford is the only person that I find realistic. He actually tells it like it is. I find the movies extremely overrated, while the prequels are underrated. My point is here that both movies are imperfect. They both have their flaws, but I think the prequels do the story much better. Acting: The acting was not good in the prequels. This is what killed the movie. They all sounded robotic. But, we have to give credit where credit is due. These actors to give it their best effort. George Lucas wanted the actors to do it his way which didn't work, but these actors truly shine in revenge of the sith. Ewan Mcgregor was great as Obi Wan. He embodied the young wise man, and he did it perfectly. Hayden Christensen was also good. Now, before you kill me. Hear me out. He was the best choice if he had a better director. Hayden Christensen did not have the benefit of having great movies before he did this movie. People judged him too soon, and I think his work really starts to come out in revenge of the sith. His bad dialogue was director's fault, but if you look at his poses, and his stares. He does a young Darth Vader pretty well. He also played the young innocent emotion driven guy pretty well, but it didn't work when it came to the love relationship. The chancellor/emperor palpatine I think was also very good. You could tell this actor loved doing what he was doing. He embodied the charming villain you could like. He had a unique ability to charm people while he was saying very controversial things. Palpatine was great. Samuel L. Jackson did appear robotic sometimes, but did a good job in representing when a good guy can make a decision that would be poor. Qui Gon as Laim Neson was also very good. He acted very well as the mentor. I think this is the part where people will heavily disagree, and I can understand why. Action: Action is better in the prequels. The sword fights were extensively updated. Every sword fight has good music behind it capturing a really good scene. Darth Vader vs Obi Wan in episode 4 was miserable. In episode 5, it got annoying. It was slow. In episode 6, they were close. In the prequels, you can see the leads doing jumps, kicks, and aggressive in your face sword combat. Anakin vs Obi Wan was very good. Environment: The environment for the prequels are heavily CGI based. A lot of people have problems with this. But, face it we now live in a CGI world. George Lucas was one of the first directors to use CGI to replace sets, You could actually see different worlds. It also created an orderly society, but also hinted at a downfall. In episode 4-6, they don't really show the different worlds. They just want you to assume that this is it. Alright, I know a lot of people want to kill me, but people must know the truth.