Young Earth Christian Creationism (YEC) is a viable explanation for the origin of our universe.

Dating methodsMany scientific textbooks and all claim that the earth is between 4.55 and 4.6 billion years old. However, there is a huge gap of 50 million, how is that accurate?Fossil record and continentional drift.I would like to point out that you are using fossil records and all as proof for evolution. Historical science and obervational science are DIFFERENT. Historical science is the fossil record, it doesn't speak for itself. People try to find ways to show how fossils prove evolution through millions of years and evolution. A biblical creationist interprets it through thousands of years and the bible.You don't exactly know what happened to the fossil, it could have been thrown around from the flood. A worldwide flood would have destroyed billions of plants and animals and thrown them around all over the Earth. This is where fossils come from according to biblical creation. If the world was one supercontinent, a worldwide flood could easily explain how the landscape was changed. A flood could easily alter the landscape.It's the same evidence, different interpretations.I mentioned before, the fossil record and all is all evidence of the past and our origins. However, you can't know for sure what happened by naturalism using observational science. An evolutionist who believes in billions of years and darwinism would interpret the same evidence as a biblical creaitonist in a DIFFERENT WAY. s://cdn-assets.answersingenesis.org...; alt="" />While we can form intelligent guesses of the past based on historical science, we can't know for sure because you weren't there. Imagine walking into a room with an hourglass. The hourglass may have some sand on the top and some sand on the bottom. However, you can't calculate how much sand was truley at the top. You can make a logical guess but factors such as cracks in the glass and if a person took out sand could highly off throw results. However, there was someone there to account for what was there. That someone was god, he has inspired people to write stories based on his words and they were put all together into the Bible. The bible has proven to be trustworthy and reliable accurate accounts of the past. Evolution Evolution suggests that life came from non-life. However, this has never been observed making evolution not really holding up with science. There is also no observable information in which new information can be added to an organism's genetic code. From going from a fish to an amphibian, new code would have to be added. There is no new code which pretty much disproves evolution.how can evoution happen then? it can't. What we observe is that humans are humans and monkeys are monkeys, and fish are fish. These are 2 scientific evidences against evolution. THe second law of thermodynamics also disprove evolution.Theistic EvolutionThere are many christians who are religious and believe in most of the bible but also try to fit in millions of years and evolution. This is not true to the bible and not true to christianity. Pope francis said that evolution and the big bang are real but this seems to go against christianity. ConclusionThe bible shows us a written first hand account of the past, evolution is just a guess based on fossils and all. sourcesHow Old Is the Earth? | Answers in GenesisThe Fossil Record | Answers in GenesisEvolution | Answers in GenesisEvidence Against Evolution | Answers in Genesiswww.youtube.com/watch?v=OD0bJ1g7REQ9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False | Humans Are FreeWhy Evolution is False