Severus Snape is a more anti-death eater character than Harry Potter

The proposed resolution was: "Severus Snape is a more anti-death eater character than Harry Potter"Readers would have noticed that Pro's arguments are incomplete. He has argued that, "Snapes is an anti-death eater character". I concur that Snape is an important anti-death eater. But to win this debate Pro needs to show that Snape was MORE anti-death eater than Harry.While we wait for the missing arguments from Famer, I will proceed with arguments in favor of Harry.Against dark arts from the beginning: As a child, Severus Snape loved dark arts. He became a death-eater by his own choice. Lily was the only thing in the world Snape loved - and he lost her due to his fascination with dark magic. It was only after Lily's death (which was partially his fault) that he became horrified with his own deed and switched side. Had Voldemord decided to kill anyone other than Lily - Snapes would have most probably happily remained on the dark side! Harry choose to work against dark arts ever since he was a child. The sorting hat decided that he was suitable for Slytherins - but he choose to become a Graffindor since Slytherins were normally associated with Dark arts.The forgiving nature: Harry has a very forgiving nature. He risked his own life to save life of Dudley Dursley - even though he never liked Dudley much. In the final part - he went to the extent of saving life of Draco Molfoy - immediately after Draco tried to kill him. Towards the end - we see that Harry even feels pity for the little piece of Voldemort's soul. Snape, on the other hand, never really forgave James or Sirius for school-days pranks. When Snapes was given the task of teaching Occlumancy to Harry - he was unable to rise above his own ego and hatred. Ultimately this Sirius’s death.Little child - Big Deeds:Harry performed several difficult and challenging tasks against the dark arts ever since he was a child. We are talking about deeds - which would have been really tough for fully grown wizards. Book 1: Saved the Philosopher's stone. Thwarted Voldemort's plans for return. Book 2: Unvieled the Chamber of Secrets, saved Ginny, helped Dobby in gaining freedom and destroyed Tom Riddle's enchanted diary. Book 3: Saved Sirius from Dementors. Book 4: Faced Voldemort and dueled with him. Brought the body of Cedric back to Howgwarts. Book 5, 6 and 7: In these books, he is part of the long fight against Voldemort and his death-eaters. He undertakes incredibly difficult tasks along with his friends. The biggest among them is the destruction of the Horcrux so as to kill Voldemort. In the Goblet of Fire, Dumbledore says [1]:"I will say it again," said Dumbledore as the phoenix rose into the air and resettled itself upon the perch beside the door. "You have shown bravery beyond anything I could have expected of you tonight, Harry. You have shown bravery equal to those who died fighting Voldemort at the height of his powers. You have shouldered a grown wizard's burden and found yourself equal to it"The dislike of dark arts: Harry was a powerful wizard. At the end - he had vanquished Voldemort. He was also the first wizard in the history of magical world who possessed all the three hallows. Had he so decided - he could have been a very powerful dark wizard himself. We see that he decided not to use the elder wand and thus terminate its history of bloodshed. Rather he preferred to spend his life as a simple but happy person in the company of Ginny. In the words of Dumbledore:"It is a curious thing, Harry, but perhaps those who are best suited to power are those who have never sought it. Those who, like you, have leadership thrust upon them, and take up the mantle because they must, and find to their own surprise that they wear it well."The Sacrifice: When he realizes that he needs to die to defeat dark art - Harry chooses to walk towards his own death. While Snape also choose to risk his life fighting the death-eaters; there is a huge difference between risking life and actually welcoming death without any defense. Voldemort inside him: Pro has tried to emphasize the fact that Snape was risking his life by being near such a great legimancy expert as Voldemort. What he has forgotten is that a part of Voldemort was living inside Harry since childhood. Harry avoided dark arts in spite of this connection.I have presented five prominent reasons why Harry Potter should be judged as 'more' anti death eater than Severus Snape. I may present further arguments in the next round - depending on the thrust of my opponent’s approach. Looking forward eagerly for arguments by Famer.References:[1] Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Chapter 36[2] Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 35