Kleptin, Logical-Master, and Yraelz are all the same person.

It doesn't matter whether or not you believe it's unfair for all three to post their own pictures or not, the burden of proof is on all three of you, seeing as how you brought them nto this, even though all three of them are you. I have proven what you staed in round one, being that it is quite possible that all three accounts could belong to one person. If you have paid attention, I've easily changed all of my account information just as I said I would. In round 2 I was a 36 year old latino living in Oregon, right now I'm a nine year old Pacific Islander in New Jersey, and in round four I'll be right back to my proper age and actual location. SO its quite possible to lie on that front. The fake account I set up is still alive and kicking, so it looks like I'll be able to prove that debate. org's watchers are not infallible. So its very possible you are all the same possible. You can only prove that you are all regular people with real pictures of yourself infront of signs indicating that you actaully live were your account says you do, and actually hold an hand made sign that says you are who you are. So far you've failed to do this. Yes, I maintain that you have not met this requirement. Its quite obvious that these pictures in the links are fake, possibly made with Microsoft Paint by the looks of the quality. There are several ways to figure this out. First off, the people all have a very apparent crop line around them. Second, this lighting does not match up. Third and what could have been first, is the paper trail, or should I say google trail, of the picture you used for the fabrications. Here are some of the pictures in their origonal stae which includes all three locations and "Kleptins" person. I'm sure I could have found the other two fake persons within 4 pages with the right keywords, but "Kleptins" pic will suffice to show that the other two people have 99.9% probably of being fake. I found Yraelz open road at a Columbian Church website. . http://i262.photobucket.com... . http://i262.photobucket.com... . http://i262.photobucket.com... . http://i262.photobucket.com... So you have still failed to give evidence that any of you are actual people. Infact, the fact that all three of you have posted these pictures only make me believe further that you could all be one in the same. Not able to provide three real people in real pictures you posted fakes, in the hopes that I wouldn't notice the forgeries (for the readers convenience, Logical Master, Kleptin and Yrealz have posted Yraelz fake photos from his link). Cute. So you have still failed to provide the physical evidence to prove your innocence. And as I showed, any 'text proof' you give should all be taken in as a lie because it can easily be a fabrication. You have 1 more round, so roughly 3 days, for all three to have posted a real picture following my guidelines. Otherwise you lose. Have fun trying to do the impossible. Now to your points 1) As you said as Kleptin, someone can easily spread 6 hours throughout the day, or can be put into a solid block, all depending on the person's lifestyle. Thinking of rebutals can be done anytime during the day, I sometimes do it at work. You can do the eatting sleeping and reading anytime during the other 18 hours. Like I said before, John Doe shows many traits of being an oddball, so anything is possible with him. 2) Like I said, John Doe's a freak of nature, anything is possible with him if what I say is true. 140 debates could be a fraction of what he is trully capable of. 3) With John Doe's low self esteem, he would keep a minimum number of accounts that he needed to manipulate the public. Winning every round would make you have a high win rate, but thats not nearly as satisfying if you know thats only you saying that. No, he'd rather have other people praise him. He'd only use enough to make them do so. 3 to 4 would be about right. 3.5) You are not the man, seeing as how its still questionable as to whether you are actually a man or not. 4) The amount of time you spent talking about the watchers, it was a big issue in your argument. But I'm confident at theend of this I'll have proven my theory 100% true. If it is, then there is an extremely high chance that you could get away with three accounts. 5) Like I said in #3, he'd use it to alter the crowds opinion. It doesn't matter if it's fun or not, its only a tactic. Most people would hardly say debating is fun, but here we are. So its not impossible to also think John Doe would like the sound of his own voice, or atleast the look of his own typing. 6) I would not have brought this up if I thought it was just experience. However, the styles are so remarkably similar that they make one wonder. So this point is not a main suspision of mine, only an observation of some very unsound coincidences. So, again, I can prove that you are all the same person by you neglecting to do so. If your all different there should be no problem and especially no fear of showing it for two weeks. So take the pictures. What would be the real harm? Your real names and addresses are annonymous, we just need proof of your bodies and general location. I've made several of my own points. Infact all of the subjects are basically my points seeing as how your opening statment was two sentences. You've failed to prove your oint, seeing as how you've provided no real proof only easily debunkable rhetoric. I have proved that you, John Doe, could easily have three accounts (your premise) and GIVEN you the way to win, but you seem to want to lose.