God exists.

(numbered syllogisms as per request, sorry about length, ran out of space) A.1. Nobody has ever been observed to never exhibit pain. 2. Therefore, everybody exhibits pain. B.1. To exhibit a phenomenon means to accept that that phenomenon is exhibited. 2. Everybody exhibits pain. 3. Therefore, everybody accepts that pain is exhibited. C.1. A phenomenon that everybody accepts to be exhibited exists. 2. Everybody accepts that pain is exhibited. 3. Therefore, pain exists. D.1. Setting aside pain, every other phenomenon that has been accepted to be exhibited has also been contested to be exhibited. 2. Therefore, pain is the only phenomenon that exists without contention. E.1. Something that is contested is a delusion. 2. Something is either real or a delusion. 3. Therefore, only something that exists without contention is real. (Note: But any "thing" can consist of both real parts--that are connected to pain--and delusory parts. The real parts give it utility/ truth. The more real parts, the more utility/ truth. Truth and reality aren't quite the same. See below.) F.1. Only something that exists without contention is real. 2. Only pain exists without contention. 3. Therefore, only pain is real. G.1. Reality is that which is real. 2. Only pain is real. 3. Therefore, reality is pain. H.1. Life takes place in reality. 2. Reality is pain. 3. Therefore, life is pain. ("Life is suffering.") I.1. what feels unendurable = the thing we want to avoid 2. Neurophysiologically, pain causes all that feels unendurable. 3. Therefore, pain equals the thing we want to avoid. J.1. Life is pain. 2. Pain equals the thing we want to avoid. 3. Therefore, life is the thing we want to avoid. K.1. To commit suicide means to end the existence of one's life. 2. You cannot avoid something that does not exist; you cannot avoid anything if you do not exist. 3. Therefore, life cannot be avoided by committing suicide. L.1. Life is consciousness experiencing life. 2. Consciousness is life. 3. Therefore, life is consciousness experiencing itself. M.1. By definition, a thing cannot diverge from itself. 2. Avoidance involves a subject diverging from a separate object. 3. Therefore, 3.1 - consciousness cannot be avoided. 3.2 - consciousness cannot avoid to experience itself. 3.3 - life cannot be avoided. 3.4 - the thing we want to avoid cannot be avoided. 3.5 - what feels unendurable cannot be avoided. 3.6 - pain cannot be avoided. 3.7 - reality cannot be avoided. N.1. By definition, something that cannot be avoided (by ending its existence or otherwise) can only be endured/ must be endured; something that cannot be endured can only be avoided. 2. Life cannot be avoided. 3. Therefore, 3.1 - life must be endured. 3.2 - pain must be endured. 3.3 - the thing we want to avoid must be endured. 3.4 - What feels unendurable must be endured. But also: 3.5 - Life can be endured. 3.6 - Pain can be endured. 3.7 - The thing we want to avoid that cannot be avoided can instead be endured. 3.8 - What feels unendurable can be endured. O.1. Neurophysiologically, the amount our pleasure center is stimulated is proportionate to the amount of positive emotion. 2. The more unendurable the sensation we manage to endure, the more our pleasure center is stimulated. 3. Therefore, managing to endure what feels unendurable causes the most positive emotion possible. P.1. well-stimulated pleasure center = the thing we want to attain (want itself) 2. Mastering endurance creates a well-stimulated pleasure center. 3. Therefore, mastering endurance is the thing we want to attain. Q.1. Being a master of endurance is always yet out of human reach (and can therefore never be attained.) 2. Mastering endurance is the thing we want to attain. 3. Therefore, the thing we want to attain is the thing that is yet out of our reach. R.1. A goal is the thing that is yet out of our reach. 2. The thing we want to attain is the thing that is out of our reach. 3. Therefore, we want to attain a goal. S.1. The truth explains reality. 2. Reality is pain. 3. Therefore, the truth explains pain. T.1. Pain is what can be endured. 2. The truth explains pain. 3. Therefore, the truth explains what can be endured. (recap: what can be endured = reality) U.1. To explain reality is to physically and/or mentally interact with reality. 2. The truth explains what can be endured. 3. Therefore, the truth (physically and/or mentally) interacts with reality. V.1. Things that do not explain reality do not interact with reality. 2. Only the truth explains reality. 3. Therefore, only the truth interacts with reality. W.1. Humans and their ancestors conceived of a tool as the thing that physically and/or mentally interacts with reality. 2. Only the truth physically and/or mentally interacts with reality. 3. Therefore, 3.1 - the truth is a tool. 3.2 - everything that is a tool is the truth. X.1. The truth is a tool. 2. Only the truth interacts with reality. 3. Therefore, only a tool interacts with reality. Y.1. Truthful frameworks of things are part of the truth. 2. The truth interacts with reality. 3. Therefore, a truthful framework of something interacts with reality. Z.1. A truthful framework of something interacts with reality. 2. Only a tool interacts with reality. 3. Therefore, a truthful framework of something is a tool. AA.1. To act upon something and get feedback from it is to reveal it. 2. To interact with something is to act upon it and get feedback from it. 3. Therefore, to interact with something is to reveal it. AB.1. A framework of something interacts with reality. 2. To interact with something is to reveal it. 3. Therefore, a framework of something reveals reality. AC.1. A framework of something is a tool that reveals reality. 2. A tool that reveals reality is a tool that exists. 3. Therefore, a framework that reveals reality is a framework of something that exists. AD.1. According to psychology, clinical psychoanalysis, pediatric psychology, cognitive neuroscience, sociolinguistics, semiotics, semiotic literary criticism, anthropology, archaeology, mythological phylogenetics, and computational statistics, the vast majority of all humans from all cultures have ancestrally described through their actions heroes, demigods, titans, the trickster, mother nature, father time/ father sky, the tree of life, the goddess, the devil, the serpent/ the dragon, and more, as the archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality (as a consequence of evolution through natural selection.) 2. What happens to the vast majority of all humans and cultures on earth influences all humans universally. 3. Therefore, the aforementioned archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality is universal. AE.1. Humans have ancestrally described through their actions heroes, demigods, titans, the trickster, mother nature, father time/ father sky, the tree of life, the goddess, the devil, the serpent/ the dragon, and more, as the archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality. 2. Historically, all ancestral descriptions of heroes, the trickster, mother nature, the serpent/ the dragon etc. over time evolve into aspects of one singular deity/ god--God. 3. Therefore, humans have ancestrally described through their actions one singular deity/ god--God--as the archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality. AF.1.1 Evolution is true/ explains what can be endured. 1.2 Evolution is nature selecting for the ability to survive. 2.1 We have a thing we want to attain/ goals. 2.2 We have ancestrally described through our actions an archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality which possesses the potential to evolve into a description for God. 2.3 We have the ability to survive. 3. Therefore, nature selects for 3.1 - the thing we want to attain/ goals. 3.2 - us to ancestrally describe through our actions an archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality which possesses the potential to evolve into a description for God. AG.1. All of our attributes that don't only kill us have been selected for by nature. 2. Nature selects for the ability to survive. 3. Therefore, all of our attributes that don't only kill us contribute to our survival. AH.1. Nature selects for what lets us move towards goals. 2.1 Nature has selected for the archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality. 2.2 According to clinical psychoanalysis, political science, and history, the collapse of psychological well-being, family units, communities, nation-states, and civilizations can always be traced back to the subjects in question acting out manifestations of the opposite of their archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality. 3. Therefore, the archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality lets us move towards goals. AI.1. Humans have ancestrally described through their actions one singular deity/ god--God--as the archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality. 2. The archetypal, personhood-possessing framework for reality lets us move towards goals. 3. Therefore, God is a framework that lets us move towards goals. AJ.1.1 By definition, a framework for reality is a framework that reveals reality. 1.2 The framework of a human being, or personhood itself, or a tree etc. is a framework that reveals reality. 2. Human beings, personhood itself, a tree etc. exist. 3. Again, therefore, a framework that reveals reality is a framework of something that exists. AK.1. A framework that lets us move towards goals is a framework that reveals reality. 2. God is a framework that lets us move towards goals. 3. Therefore, God is a framework that reveals reality. AL.1. A framework that reveals reality is a framework of something that exists. 2. God is a framework that reveals reality. 3. Therefore, God exists.