Police - The new domestic military

I will start off by saying anything I say now is not to be taken as my final word, do not limit me to two sections of three in order to instill your self-assured "victory" you think you have.You say I have no resources yet you show no resources of your own except for your gradual list of insults, I could get that level of information from a troll. I like how you call me out and claim my views are moronic and biased. Sure, I am biased. Biased in fact, against the blissfully ignorant and the predator such as yourself. Point at me as the problem, that'll achieve what has already been achieved, ignorance in regard to this topic. Let it be known how much you want to let people go on being as unprepared as you are. Have you ever thought for a minute about what being bias can be? Unwilling to accept the bullcrap and pushing for the truth to be known. That's your bias. Now that you've been corrected on that, I will further correct you on everything else.You say that people are busy and have a place to go but they aren't in cars... You claim that people have places to be and can't get to where they have to be in ample time. Yet, putting barriers on the sidewalk saying people HAVE to stay on the sidewalk doesn't make more room for those people who have to get places. Do you think they have some certificate that says they have permission to walk on the road because they're going somewhere? No, they don't. And if they do, where are YOUR facts? How can people who have somewhere to go get there in a faster amount of time with less space to move around? How is a blocked sidewalk a better passage than an entire street, including the sidewalk as well? As for those "breaking the law" by going over the barriers, they weren't given notice that it's illegal to do so, and when they were contacted, the police didn't respond to any form of communication regarding the topic. Which, if you read my SOURCE THAT I PUT FOR A REASON, the information did in fact come from them. http://www.alternet.org...And here's another article talking about the police corruption going on http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com...They DO brutalize citizens so they can meet their quota. Every officer has a quota of arrests. Here's your source. http://consumerist.com...I thought it was general knowledge. Perhaps you're not as smart as you make yourself out to be.The War on Terrorism has to do with this in the terms that the police are starting to act like they're the military. If you really think they don't have a locker room full of machine guns, grenades, and pretty much anything that would be illegal for a citizen to own, then you are misinformed to the nth degree. http://www.ajc.com...Grenades: http://tinyurl.com...I don't know anything about Nazism eh? Is that why I made a reference to it then? No. It isn't. I referred to Nazis because in Nazi Germany you are right, people couldn't speak their minds, or be politically free. That was the analogy I was giving. The police are using fear to keep people from speaking their minds, and being politically free. AKA throwing grenades and threatening with guns, then arresting peaceful protesters. The reference of their booming economy was to point out that even under the highest amount of corrupt their economy was doing better than ours. And we make a lot more war goods than you think. According to this http://www.germanmilitaryhistory.com... Nazi Germany "In 1936, Hitler instituted a Four-Year Plan for the economy under Reichsmarschall (Reich Marshal) Herman Göring. The idea was designed to centralize the economy. However, as with everything else in the Third Reich, the rivalry of higher-ranking officials, encouraged by Hitler, meant that the economy remained a battlefield for various competing interests, even within the armed forces themselves. Despite these inefficiencies, Germany rebuilt its military. Spending on the armed forces, however, was consuming 50 percent of the budget, or approximately 60 billion reichsmarks, per year. Hjalmar Schacht, head of the Reichsbank, pointed out that this level of expenditure could not be sustained."According to Wikipedia, the http://en.wikipedia.org... "The Reichsmark was put on the gold standard at the rate previously used by the Goldmark, with the U.S. dollar worth 4.2 ℛℳ." Meaning the US dollar in WWII times.According to http://data.bls.gov... 60 billion reichsmarks would be worth $233.143 billion today. Multiply that by about 3.4 in order to get the populations even, you get roughly $792 billion dollars being spent by Nazi Germany. So they spent that much on the military in 1936, while we spend http://en.wikipedia.org... $685.1 billion, they spent about 15% more than we do, after all the adjustments have been made.Let's break it down to you. Police get paid based on how "good" they do their job. As people get arrested, they get more money as they're meeting their quota, as I linked to you above. As well as the cost to the individual dealing with court and the tax dollars involved if they get prosecuted.Make all the implications you want. Your entire response was asking me where my references were, and here they are. Now where are YOUR references? The police ARE the minions of constitution. They're the lowest form of law enforcement on the hierarchy, whereas the United States Constitution is the highest form. They disregard the law of the land. The government DOES work for us. It's a government "BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE". Our tax dollars go towards their salaries. Our tax dollars are going to a less than 15% Congress approval rate, and a failing president. When the government disregards us as their employers, it's the spark of a revolution.Also thanks for the insulting innuendo due to your lack of better content. Your "warped perception of reality" remark has just been invalidated.For every few apples there's a rotten apple. But rotten apples can also be entire police departments themselves. I didn't disregard police as never protecting people, but I did focus on the fact this corruption and neglect is happening under our noses and it isn't right. Being oblivious isn't right neither, as you obviously are, hence the verbal attacks you've made on me. The police are PAID BY US, and are to follow the guidelines of the United States Constitution. As well as their state constitutions. Who did they keep safe in the Occupy movements? If anything the police did more damage than the people were capable of doing.There goes your "hate-filled argument". Perhaps you're the bias one in this.