Poop has DNA

" but his topic does not even exist. "I TAKE OFFENSE TO THAT, Spongebob does exist somewhere, hes chillin under the sea with whats left of Osama Bun Laden's corpse. "Con has said that I did not specify DNA, but round one was just for acceptance, not definitions"THAT WAS NOT SPECIFIED, no where did you say definitions of DNA or poop were specified for later rounds. I thought that DNA was open to interpretation. I gave my interpretation, and now the Pro is saying that spongebob isnt real. That is very poor conduct Pro, go to your room" I stated the real definition of DNA in round two. "Only AFTER I HAD ALREADY DEFINED IT. That is some really bad conduct to change the definition of a word halfway through the debate. .. "These two videos show how waste is used for different purpose: Identifying dogs and detecting cancer. Neither of these would be possible without DNA present. "Which definition of DNA are we using again, the one I made or the one YOU CHOSE. I for one do not see how Demonized Nambian Antelopes need to be present for detecting cancer. "Colon pollens and cancers shed DNA and ends up in your stool. Stool=Feces, waste"THATS THE DUMBEST THING IVE EVER HEARD! !! !! ! I have never looked down in my toilet and seen THIS. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . "Con has not disputed any of my arguments"Yes I have, I proved how it is impossible for Demonized Nambian Antelopes cannot be in everyone's poop since they are known to only exist in the deserts of Nambia. I also proved how DNA cannot be in poop since poop is a campaign slogan for an underwater restaurant chain. " Con would rather debate a fantasy argument than debate mine"MORE INSULTS ABOUT HOW SPONGEBOB ISNT REAL >:O"-There are no "Demonized Nambian Antelopes" on Google, Yahoo, or Bing, three of the biggest search engines, therefore I say there is no such thing. "So just because its not there it means it doesnt exist? by that logic everything that IS on the internet DOES existList of things the Pro thinks is real since its on the internet. homicidal sealsthat hillary clinton is a reptilethat aliens like to eat people who smokeghostsaliensghosts having butt sex with aliens that martians fought goblinsthe alaska bull wormthat Abraham Lincoln was a vampire hunterAllow me to recap this debate1) Pro forfeits that Demonic Nambian Antelopes (DNA) does not exist in people's poop 2) Pro forfetis that Demonic Nambian Antelopes (DNA) can be represented as DNA3) Pro believes that everything on the internet is real4) Pro forfeits that the Demonic Nambian Antelopes were the spawn of the Great Antelope Civil War5) Pro forfeits that he did not define DNA in the first round6) Pro forfeits that he did not specify that we had to wait to round two and wait for him to define everything7) Pro forfeits that poop is a campaign slogan for underwater fast food restaurant chains8) Pro forfeits there is neither Deoxyribonucleic acid nor Demonized Nambian Antelopes in the campaign slogan known as poop9) Pro forfeits that he did not lay the ground rules for the debate in round 1, leaving it open to interpretation, definitions, etcfor the record, all pictures come from different sources, so I have 7 sources to the Pro's 8, but of those 8, 3 are searches for Demonized Nambian Antelopes which dont count, meaning the Pro only has 5 actual sources. Since two are from youtube who knows how reliable it is because we have all seen youtube videos claiming that 9/11 was a conspiracy. In reality Pro has 5 sources but two of them are not credible since they come from the same website that says 9/11 was a conspiracy.