Francis is not the head of the Catholic Church

Since my opponent refuses to deal with my argument and also insists to rest on the authority of of Wikipedia to determine to legitimacy of Francis as the head of the Catholic Church, I cannot continue to develop my case. I'll put my argument in a silogism and continue to substantiate the second premise. But first i'll present five assumptions: 1)Catholic teaching, (i.e. the Church's magisterium) is the rule by which we know if someone is a heretic. It is by comparing what one person believes, says or does to what the Church teaches that we know that this person is not a Catholic. 2) A formal heretic is an obstinate and public heretic. 3)The papacy is an office of the Catholic Church. 4)The papacy is the office of the head of the Catholic Church. 5)What the Catholic Church teaches about formal heretics membership and office in the Church is the rule on this matter. So, if the Church teaches that a formal heretic cannot hold office in the Church, then, he cannot hold office in the Church. If the contender does not agree with all the above mentioned assumptions, then this debate is worthless. Because the discussion here pressuposes that both sides agree that Catholic teaching is our proximate rule of faith. I say this because, reading his comments on the debate, it seems that he does not agree with all this assumptions nor he claims to be Catholic. First premise: The Catholic Church teaches that formal heretic is not a member of the Church neither can he hold office in it. Second premise: Jorge Mario Bergoglio (i.e. Francis) is a formal heretic. Conclusion: Francis is not a member of the Church nor holds office in it. Being the papacy an office in the Catholic Church, namely the office of the head of the Catholic Church, Francis therefore is not the Pope, which is the same as to say that he is not the head of the Catholic Church. As it is obvious, the contender cannot attack the conclusion. He has to refute the first or the second premise. I'll proceed to expose the facts that prove the validity of the second premise, namely, that Francis is a formal heretic. All material will be extracted from here: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com... and http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com... 1- To call someone a believer is the same thing as to say that someone is part of the faithful. I think no one will deny this. Francis called the rabbi Sergio Bergman a "believer". Francis therefore says that Sergio Bergman is part of the faithful, which is the same as to say that this rabbi is in the Mystical Body of the Church. In other words, according to Francis, this rabbi is a member of the Church despite the fact that he rejects Jesus Christ. THIS IS HERESY. And if he means that someone can be a "believer" outside the Church, THIS IS ALSO HERESY, for the Catholic creed says that all the faithful have "one Baptism and one Lord. The Catholic creed teaches that the Faith, The Lord and the Baptism, are inseparable. Sergio Bergman does not have the Lord nor the Baptism. Therefore, he does not have the Faith, hence, he is not a "believer". Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, "Cantate Domino," 1441, ex cathedra: "... those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews..." Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, Decree # 30, 1311R08;1312, ex cathedra: "...there is... one universal Church, outside of which there is no salvation, for all of whom there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism"" 2- Francis took part in a interreligious cerimony to honor deceased jews whom rejected Jesus Christ. To honor someone who has passed away is to consider that that person could have been saved. THIS IS HERESY. A jew who reject Jesus Christ, as explained above, is not part of the faithful. [And I say "who reject Jesus Christ" to prevent misundertanding: racial jews (the correct word is Judeans by the way) that is, someone who is of the blood descendence of the biblical Judeans can be saved as anyone else, PROVIDED THAT HE REJECTS JUDAISM, BE BAPTISED AND CONVERTS TO THE CATHOLIC FAITH.] But the Catholic Church teaches that those who are not part of the faithful cannot be saved. Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: "There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved..." (Explicit mention to the jews) Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, "Cantate Domino," 1441, ex cathedra: "The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives..." 3- Francis promotes religious freedom, but the Catholic Church condemns religious freedom. Francis, Address, May 18, 2013: "" promote religious freedom for everyone, everyone! Every man and every woman must be free in his or her profession of religion, whatever it may be." L" Osservatore Romano, May 22, 2013, p. 11. Pope Pius IX, Quanta Cura (# 3), Dec. 8, 1864: "... that erroneous opinion... NAMELY, THAT "LIBERTY OF CONSCIENCE AND WORSHIP IS EACH MAN"S PERSONAL RIGHT, WHICH OUGHT TO BE LEGALLY PROCLAIMED AND ASSERTED IN EVERY RIGHTLY CONSTITUTED SOCIETY..." Conclusion: it is a documented fact that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a formal heretic. To deny this after seeing this facts is simply to lie. And there are many more heresies that I could have mentioned. Therefore, the second premise is true. In my opening statement I showed that my first premise is true. Therefore the conclusion that Francis is not the head of the Catholic Church is true, wether someone likes it or not.