proof only agnosticism is true

Round 5 of the war begins.I am intrigued by Pro's premise that I must show proof that agnosticism is not the only true viewpoint. To make it exceptionally clear, the way the resolution is worded, "proof ONLY agnosticism is true" means I must prove simply that other ideas about the universe can be correct along WITH agnosticism. So I hope Pro understands what position I am trying to argue.That being said, let me provide a definition of agnosticism for those not in the know (which was myself a couple minutes ago). Agnostic: "a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god 2 : a person who is unwilling to commit to an opinion about something <political agnostics>" http://www.merriam-webster.com... So we see that an agnostic is someone who cannot decide whether the ultimate reality is knowable and it is concluded by them to be most likely unknowable. Therefore all I must prove is that the supposed reality we live in (which we will not discuss whether it is the real reality unless Pro desires) actually can be known.With that, arguments.1. Science/Mathematics shows that humanity understands the makeup of this universe.If the reality we wish to know is our universe, we already know it. "Scientists are still filling in the missing pieces in the elementary particle world. Where will it end? Around about 1890, scientists were lamenting the death of physics and pondering a life reduced to measuring the next decimal point! Discoveries made in the 1890's proved that the surface had only been scratched. Each decade of the 1900's has seen the frontier pushed to smaller and smaller objects. The explosion of knowledge has not slowed down and as each threshold has been passed the amount of new science seems to be greater even as we probe to smaller dimensions. Current theories (if correct) imply that there is even more below the next horizon awaiting discovery." http://education.jlab.org... This shows that Science is slowly revealing the nature of our current reality to us on its most basic and fundamental level. This means that humanity KNOWS the reality we live in, the ultimate reality of this universe. Whether or not we can know God is less important, we have full proof that we know how this ultimate reality of our universe works and operates on minute detail in some places. Thus it is proven, Science shows that agnosticism isn't the only correct viewpoint. What about Mathematics?Well this evidence should provide some insight."Standard probability theory, long thought to underlie human reasoning, holds that people should answer questions consistently regardless of question order. Such theories cannot account for order effects, so researchers typically consider such phenomena to be unwanted statistical noise. To minimize this noise, survey designers often split respondents into groups and give them different sequences of questions. But cognitive scientist Zheng Wang of The Ohio State University in Columbus and colleagues suspected that notions of probability borrowed from quantum physics theory might help explain this seemingly irrational reasoning pattern. "What our research tries to show is that … maybe quantum probability is a better way [than classical probability theory] to explain human cognition and judgment," Wang said." https://www.insidescience.org... This is proof that mathematics has reached a point where humanity has now begun to understand the mathematics that makes up human thought, and find ways to craft the perfect questions to beat irrationality. This is a new level of knowledge that is not doubtful, but rather a fuller understanding of the universe we live in. This proves that doubting existence and reality, is not always true. Sometimes facts about knowing our current reality, overpower any doubt there is on the subject.2. Human thought/theory can conclude God might be true based on universal truths.This is more theory based logic here so be warned.When people present the idea of a black swan theory, they mean the idea that due to cause and effect being a real cycle in this reality, then any level of alternate universes had to begin from somewhere. Whether that is the Christian God is highly debatable, though definitely probable because of the strong evidence around us of the possibility of existence (note the word possibility). But some argue that whoever the Black Swan that is the starter for evolution is, that thing had to exist inifinitely before us and after us, therefore God must exist. What this point is proving is that no matter how much doubt is cast on the subject, the idea that everything has a source in our reality proves that our reality needed a source. Because in our reality, nothing cannot spring out something. Thus the point is that other ideas about God's existence being true, logically hold under theory, so agnosticism once again, is not the ONLY correct viewpoint.With these arguments I await what will surely be a concise response by my opponent.-42