Commuter trains should have segregated carriages for both ladies and homosexual gentlemen

Pro states that gender segregated trains will improve, if not solve, the issue of females being touched inappropriately by men. Pro also goes on to state that homosexual men should also be separated from straight men to prevent the gay men from touching the straight men. To start off, Pro states: "[...] ladies-only carriages should be introduced in cities across the world [...]." Unfortunately, this is not an efficient solution to this problem, as this problem is very centralized in Japan. In the US (as an example) this is not an issue for multiple reasons. 1. The trains are not as over crowded, here in the US. 2. Men are not as inclined to touch a women inappropriately in the US, and 3. Women do not hold similar cultural values as Japan, and therefore are more inclined to report an incident, or they will blatantly tell the person to stop, and make a scene, which will allow others to assist her. To operate trains like this world wide would serve to only harm commuters, as families would not be allowed to travel together, getting on a train would be a huge hassle, and American men (for sake of example) would be viewed as sexual deviants which would be unfair, and untrue. Pro goes on to state that straight men will be subject to the same harassment that women were if the homosexual men are also not moved to their own train car. Pro suggests the solution is to make two special train cars. One for women, and one for homosexual men. First off, who would be there to enforce who goes into what carriage? If you add security to monitor who gets on what carriage, why cant you add security to monitor the men on a train to make sure they are keeping their hands to themselves? Pro then goes on to say: "The gay men would be as happy to travel in their own segregated carriage as the women would be in theirs because they would be in a carriage full of other gay men who would all be touching each other up (homosexual men are very promiscuous and like that sort of thing)." (Which, first of all is a disgusting, and insulting generalization) Pro states that, because the carriage is full of gay men touching each other, they wouldn't have an issue with it. This is entirely false. Just like everyone else, gay men don't want to be touched while on their way to work/school etc. Just because they share the same sexual orientation, doesn't mean they are open to being groped by anyone at anytime. If this were the case, then straight men, and straight women shouldn't be separated, because according to your logic, they shouldn't mind it due to them being the same sexual orientation, correct? Also, you state that "homosexual men are very promiscuous and like that sort of thing" which is stated by you as some sort of fact, but without citation. This comment is first of all an insulting generalization, and entirely false. Just because a man shows sexual interest in another man, does not mean they are "into that sort of thing." On this point, why would we not be separating homosexual women? What if they get on the women only carriage, and grope them, what then? If you are going to separate homosexual men, you have to separate homosexual women. So when a train arrives, the process would turn into a treasure hunt trying to: find the homosexual carriage. then the homosexual carriage for your gender. or if you're straight, you have the find the straight carriage. and then the appropriate gender as well. This concept is ridiculous, and it does not make sense for rail companies to introduce these concepts onto commuter trains as Pro suggests. Thank you.