The god of the bible would not be stupid enough, Not ever, To use text as a form of communication

Oh god, Here we go again, Another one of your insult rants about how God doesn't exists. You thinking all your points are incontrovertible. Seriously? Saying a don't have friends and I get Fs on every paper? That's not even close to true. And can you answer my main question, "What other form of communication would God have used instead of text? " we are using it right now. Stop cherry-picking my quotes of context too, It's a tad bit annoying. "I"ve been doing this for 3x your age and I do know a lot more about your god, Bible and religion than you ever will. So a brief introduction"What kind of experience? On DDO alone you have had 147 debates, Lost 84, Tied 59, And won 4. That's not very good experience is it? Obviously not good at wining of the other side. "And it is my right to degrade, Dehumanize and belittle them with my brand of sarcastic, Dumb, Idiotic, Original, Gone from this universe. . . " So your not going to tell them your point? Your just going to insult them until they get sad? Also you don't need to capitalize each word after a comma! ;) (Grammar police)"1. You can"t even prove that YOUR god exists. So that"s a super mega fatalistic flaw. "Well you tell me. Your the one asking IF the God of the Bible existed why would he use text. You kinda just broke of the question your asking and said that he doesn't exist. So for the remainder of this debate I would like us to be talking as if God were to exist, Why would he use text as communication. Also you can't disprove God's assistance either. And we all know Jesus did exist whether or not he was the son of God or not. "I'm going to go by the three strike rule. 3 Strikes and you are OUT. " Well why'd you make it 4 rounds if it's like this then? And if so who's to judge? You? No that's not right, It'd be too biased. If you're doing it, Then I will too. So that's three strikes for all of my previous arguments. Wow, That was fast, Guess your out? "1, 000 supermassive hypocritical contradictions and inconsistencies in a book that's supposed to be perfect"Well they tried their best. The shoved a bunch of books together and got the Bible. There's no way in the hell you don't believe in in that the Bible would be perfect. Through all the the translations and different view points it would not perfect. Stop using this as an argument. It's obvious and well known through all Christians that the Bible ain't perfect. I didn't read the Bible back to back but I know that there would be som errors in there. "Since you believe that YOUR unproven god did not "write" the bible, Then what part did he partake in it? Nothing? Some of it? A great deal of it? All of it? " Well I personally believe God took no part in the writing of the Bible. Unless you count doing everything that is written about in the Bible. "After all YOUR god would have had to have barked out his orders to commit genocide after genocide after genocide and thus murdering countless babies, Children, And pregnant women (abortions in which you supposed christians - don"t worry, There"s no such a thing as a christian, Ared so against which is 100% contradictory and hypocritical), "The way I see it, Death isn't a bad thing in the eyes of God or me. You either go to Heaven or to Hell. And based on God's rules and your journey in life, That's were it'll take you. Look I know what you're going to say, "But if babies aren't baptized then they go to hell. " Well we don't exactly know that. We can conclude that based on the info God and Jesus has already given us but who knows? There could be something way bigger that we can't even understand here. Maybe that baby was going to become the next Hitler or something? And yes I get that it's MY God so you can stop emphazing that it's MY God. And Christians don't exsist? You think I don't exsist? I can assure you that I personally exsist and I am a Catholic Christian. "That"s a HUGE strike 1. Because no god would ever allow mixed messages that would not ever. Not for any reason be allowed to become false. " Yes, He actually would. God is trying to be kept a controversial subject. He's giving us a choice, Free will. Think about it, If God came down right now, This very moment to everyone in the world. Don't you think everyone would become a Christian? He's not going to give us hard evidence he exists because he wants to give you that choice to follow him. He's not going to force you into loving him or knowing him. "The only thing they could've done to keep all of Jesus's words"" Whoa there sparky. 1. You do fully realize that christ was the false messiah - correct? I mean you do fully understand that? So now that that is established, Jesus is now a dead subject. And then you sadly continue because you don"t know any better"Well you're the one asking me. Another time you used the "didn't exsist" excuse. You pretty much just asked me, "If God exsisted why'd he use text to communicate? " and then I say my response, And at the end all you say is "Yeah, But he didn't exsist so whatever you just said doesn't matter. " So why'd you ask me in the first place? "You do fully realize that those who were around jesus could not read nor could they write. "First of all Paul was able to write as he had written many letters. Jesus could also write and read as in John 8:6-8. And many of his followers had a good chance of being able to write or read. As the Rabbis in the temple had scrolls which had to be read and written. "Yep. The NT was not put together until roughly 57 years AFTER the death of YOUR messiah. " The NT was also a series of written books and scriptures each written at different times after Jesus had died. "Here"s a series of videos for you to watch. Will you watch them? Nah. " Of course I won't watch them theirs at the least an hour of atheism in these videos. Can you debate on your own? Without having your precious videos to assist you? These videos only take things from the Bible and have no none sources. I have watched snippits of each video. And "Why Does Every Intelligent christian disobey jesus? " doesn't make sense, They took these commandments they made and took these quotes a litterally as possible. When you say "cat got your tounge? " Does a cat actually have your tounge? No. When you drink poison it symbolizes you facing something that questions your faith and surviving it with your faith still there. "See? That"s tro the letter why I HATE debating with teeny boppers who---cannot---fricken---READ! But then again you are grouped right up there with pretty near 100% of all of those who claim of themselves to be christians because they cannot READ either. "Oh. Sorry should I not be here? I can't read this so I can't possibly debate against your point. If anyone here can read it's obviously not you. Your the one who got the title wrong. "We"ll strike the next paragraph. " Yep, Just going to take a big chunk out of my argument likes it's nothing. Really good job bud. "God didn't decide to make it written, Man did. " OK so creation was entirely man"s idea - correct? Yup. There are no records of God, (or Jesus) telling anyone to write down his records or record anything he said.