Islamic Socialism Is Superior To Atheistic Socialism

If a government has a national religion of atheism they show no affiliation towards a particular sector of their society they merely state they have no belief in god. This however does not mean that the citizens of the country are not free to choose a personal religion where is it written that an atheist social society must oppress religion ?. It simply means the government will not be biased towards a particular religion a similar policy to that seen In japan which ""enjoys full religious freedom based on Article 20 of its Constitution"" ""we do not find in Islamic Socialism and that is the brutal repression of all things of the old society. Islamic Socialism functions in harmony with Islamic Society obviously which is the fastest growing religion in the world"" Surely in this point you are talking about the implementation of an atheist society where there previously was not one. The same would be involved if you tried to implement a Islamist socialist society where there previously was no tone so your point is not on the merits of an Islamist socialist society but the implementation of one which would be encountered by implementing a new type of society anywhere therefore your point is invalid. You talk about the pros of and Islamic society but there are also strong negative sides to such a culture. For example if a women is raped and deemed to have committed adultery then under Islamic law the it is the women is stoned to death. They consider women to be inferior in every way in iran this week they have voted to make it impossible for a women to run for president. Another offence punishable by death is being a homosexual, just for being a homosexual in a country where the law is based on Islam you will be executed by the state in the name of god how can this be justified? I include a links relating to examples of both of these laws being enforced. http://news.bbc.co.uk... http://www.guardian.co.uk.... There is also a brutal nature to the punishments handed out for example if you steel anything you have your hand cut off no matter what age you are there are examples of children younger than the age of 10 being mutilated for life because of one mistake .If you tell I lie no matter for what reason and are found out you have your tongue cut out. These punishments are acts of a brutality and have no place in modern day society. You say look at Gadhafi and Islam requires that all faithful must give a portion of their individual wealth and material possessions to those who are needy however "" Libya has high levels of social inequality"" so the wealthy are obviously not giving a significant proportion of their wages. Furthermore people who live in atheist system are free to donate money to charities or local funds and is not only solely available to a Islamic system. You claim it was Gadhafi who was solely responsible for the turnaround in education in Libya "" -literacy rates in Libya have fallen from 61 per cent in 1971 to 14 per cent in 2001. As of 2005, the combined gross enrolment ratio for primary education stood at 95.9"" However "" UN sanctions were lifted in September 2003"" "" Many international oil companies returned to the country, including oil giants Shell and ExxonMobil.[130] After sanctions were lifted "" So the rise in primary enrolment cannot fully be attributed to Islamic socialism but is more likely to be the knock on effect of the improvement in the financial situation of the country. I think the ultimate rebuttal against your assertion of what a great system Gadhafi brought to the country is the fact Gadhafi is no longer leader. He was overthrown by a his own population who were deeply unhappy with his style of government. Finally an atheist society has the potential to adapt and involve according to the times we all share the same human desire for survival and most understand the basic necessity for laws to protect our human rights. We should not however base our entire society of a book written over 1000 years ago we as a society have to adapt. It is no longer acceptable to stone homosexuals or chop the hands of children who have stolen some food. This is why a atheist social society is better than an Islamic social society. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org...