All homosexuals and bisexuals who live gay lifestyles are perverts

Do you know what is really cute? People who just throw out the word fallacy without an understanding of the fallacies he is speaking about. I didn't straw man you, you failed to show that sexual relations between two heterosexual people without the goal of getting pregnant is somehow an exception so I ignored it. But hey, if it makes you feel all big inside, go ahead. /You go BlackHomophobeAtheists, you can now enter the toddler portion of debating! You're really moving on up in the ranks, aren't you? Next thing you know, you might be a part of the tater-tots division!/ (sarcasm). Holy hotcakes, Batman. You say that sex evolved for reproduction but seem to also think that sex evolved to... happen. Duh. I mean, the clitoris doesn't exist to be stimulated by a man, it exists to be stimulated, period. The penis didn't just evolve to get the semen into the vagina, it also evolved to make that act pleasurable. So we have to evolutionary purposes. Sure, one homosexuality doesn't meet, but the other one does. Your claim that sex evolved purely for straight sex is a little odd considering that males can have their g spot in their anus.And yes, there is a concerning number of gay AIDS carriers, but it's irrelevant to this debate because heterosexual people can contract it as well. This isn't the gay disease by any stretch of the imagination, so including it as evidence of the body rejecting their homosexuality is bizarre. Oh wow, in calling my argument about the clitoris a strawman you seem to have straw manned me. You completely ignored the fact that the clitoris exists purely for sexual stimulation and lesbians achieve this goal when they have sex, or attempt to. This isn't me saying, "Well, straight people can be perverts too," it's me saying that here's distinct proof that lesbians aren't perverts when it comes to their sex lives. I also don't think that males are perverts when they fail. My point is that even when not achieving a goal, this doesn't make them perverts.Let's say there are two round holes, or three, or even four. You have a cylinder which can functionally be put into any of these holes. The only difference is that one is a red hole, one a green, another a yellow, and finally a blue. You put your cylinder into any of these holes. The whole served its purpose as did the cylinder.You seem to think that I am admitting that homosexuality is a perversion, but my defense is that everything is a perversion. This isn't what I am saying. My point was that your definition was too broad, too vague, and functionally useless, to the point where the majority of the universe can be classified a pervert. The only possible one that could apply exclusively to homosexuals is the second definition, which is too subjective and dependent on community to realistically have a debate around. I think it is disingenuous for you to imply that you are only going for a technicality, where you seem to think that by a broad and ineffective definition homosexuality clarifies. You have to know that this isn't all there is though. There's a real, painful connotation to pervert that dehumanizes and illegitimatized a part of someone that is so crucial to their life. It is irresponsible to ignore the cultural perception of perversion and simply try to win through some appeal to definition.To conclude, Pro never showed why only straight people can have casual sex and it be okay whereas gay people can do functionally the same thing and it be wrong. They didn't defend their definition or try to make it more precise, or even dispute my argument that showed that the first definition is insufficient. Also, there are purely sexual organs that don't play any role in reproduction besides stimulating during the act, which not all people can do. Under this definition, anyone who isn't constantly pushing out babies or impregnating women are perverts because they aren't performing their evolutionary goal to reproduce. Asexual people are perverts, old people are perverts, infertile people are perverts, etc.