The Oculus Rift/Project Morphesus might fail.

"Well I can't really debate this anymore since the topic has changed and I have put all my eggs in the why it will be uccessful like I was supposed to do. It is way to late to formulate a new argument so I will leave it like this. The Oculus rift will succeed because of the overwhelming rave for it in the gaming community right now. Since my point has been why it will be successful instead of how long it will last I stood true to my side. While my opponent completly changed the subject. If it was how long the virtual reality headsets would last it would say: "The Virtual Reality headsets will not last that long." But it is: "The Oculus Rift/Projrct Morphesus might fail." Final piece of evidence is that my opponent admitted that it will be successful: "Probably, the O.R and P.M will succeed and it will be remembered as "revolutionary" to the gaming industry." It's not too late to formulate a new argument. Good debaters debate all the way through no matter what. I mean, I don't want to be a good debater. I just came here to interact with people because I'm such a loner. But, I'm pretty offended by what you said. "I'm just very disappointed there are people like you in this website." That was very unnecessary. If you say you can't formulate a different debate argument. That technically means you forfeit because you failed to comply with participation. For that, I will still continue with my argument. OH WAIT! I DID SAY THAT IN THE BEGINNING! I DID! "I just don't think that the VR headset thing is not going to last too long in my opinion because here is what I think is going to happen." That's what I EXACTLY said in ROUND ONE!. So, you were wrong. I said that at the very first argument. So, you were wrong. Don't just look at the title, look at my first statement too. Don't say bullsh*t like "How was I supposed to see that?" No, that's no excuse. There's proof right there and YOU CHANGED THE SUBJECT at first. So, YOU'RE THE BAD GUY HERE! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Sorry, I got so excited. Anyway, let me PROFESSIONALY formulate my last argument. Okay, I can't find anymore relevant reasons on why it could fail, but that doesn't mean I'm going to ditch out like you're doing now. Disclaimer: Again, I've said this like twice now, I'm not saying that failure is guaranteed. I said that in the very beginning as well. So, I'll begin my conclusive argument now. "Final piece of evidence is that my opponent admitted that it will be successful: "Probably, the O.R and P.M will succeed and it will be remembered as "revolutionary" to the gaming industry." Yes, I've admitted it will be successful. Successful BUSINESS WISE. I said that their were two versions of being successful - Business terms and Consumer terms. "Success in consumer terms is having your product the best it can be. Give it value. Make it convincing to the consumers that you won't mess it up. Give them a reason to keep spending money on a product." Pretty much everything sells and businesses get money. But, success isn't success to the consumer when it fails and messes up at its features. Plus, aren't you a consumer as well? We don't know if the Oculus Rift will f**k it up. They might f**k it up, they might not. Now, look here. The Kinect was SUCCESSFUL! Look at this link. This will blow your mind. Yes, THE KINECT WAS SUCCESSFUL! BUSINESS WISE like you said. But, IT FAILED in QUALITY! Everyone hated it. Nobody liked it and it turned out to be a piece of garbage. I'll copy and paste. Look at this junk: "24 million units of Kinect had been shipped by February 2013. Having sold 8 million units in its first 60 days on the market, Kinect has claimed the Guinness World Record of being the "fastest selling consumer electronics device". According to Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter, Kinect bundles accounted for about half of all Xbox 360 console sales in December 2010 and for more than two-thirds in February 2011. More than 750,000 Kinect units were sold during the week of Black Friday 2011." Can you believe that? IT ALSO GOT AWARDS! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! This is amazing. This is why you don't quit out in the end. Awards "The machine learning work on human motion capture within Kinect won the 2011 MacRobert Award for engineering innovation. Kinect Won T3's "Gadget of the Year" award for 2011. It also won the "Gaming Gadget of the Year" prize. 'Microsoft Kinect for Windows Software Development Kit' was ranked second in "The 10 Most Innovative Tech Products of 2011" at Popular Mechanics Breakthrough Awards ceremony in New York City." http://en.wikipedia.org... According to the research that I've gathered, things will be alright for the PC. Because I've seen all these tests and I keep seeing PCs. They said they have Console support, but, again, the games need to have good specifications. That means games need to run 1080p at 60fps. You said that it's simple, but it's not. Titanfall is locked at 60fps, but it doesn't have 1080p. You said that resolution doesn't matter which was the stupidest argument you've made. The Oculus Rift needs you to be immersed in a virtual world right? You want to feel immersed in a world of blurred pixels? Again, the screen will be zoomed meaning you will see the pixels a lot easier. That also means you will see some blur in 720p. I doubt that you want to get 50% of the effect in your machine that you paid 300 dollars for. The PS4 and Xbox One will struggle because it has to run the Oculus Rift which is a powerful machine. A machine that's 300 bucks right? So, that means it must have a lot of power. Now, you put a game that goes at 60fps and 1080p like Crysis with it too. That's like tasking a regular man to carry 200-300 pounds of weight. That's just single player. What about multiplayer? Multiplayer will be an even bigger issue because, first of all, the developers have to change the matchmaking to where people who have the Oculus Rift on will play with other people with the same thing. Second of all, the servers is not only tracking the body movement of player, but it's also tracking the head movement. Now, that's not going to be a problem if the developers have good servers. But, if you're playing something like Call of Duty, Battlefield 4, or game that have crappy servers, there will be problems. Lag, motion sickness (I don't know about the motion sickness. The motion sickness depends on who's playing.), all sorts of issues. I don't even have to say anything else. That one link right there. That link right there is my argument. That's my proof, that's my counterstatement, that's my everything. Yep, go look at it. That proves to you that this has happened before. That proves to you that it's a possibility that it could sell, but turn out a piece of junk to the consumers. It just depends on what they do with the consumer version and what the console support is like. I mean, the PC might actually do just fine. My concern is the Console support. http://en.wikipedia.org... You see? This is why you shouldn't dog out of a debate at the end.