Is it likely that God exists.

Let me begin my second round by telling you a story of Roy Sullivan. Roy Sullivan was often referred to as "Human Lightning Conductor" or "Human Lightning Rod". He was in a Guiness Book of World Records as a person who survived getting struck by lightning 7 times. He lived in the U.S. Let's look at the U.S. Statistics. The chances of getting struck by lightning in a lifetime are roughly 1/3000. The chances of getting struck by lightning 7 times in a lifetime are (1/3000)^7 which is 4.57x10^-25 That's 0.00000000000000000000000457% chance. That's very small. Let's go further. Around 10% of people who get struck by lightning die. The chances of getting struck by lightning in an lifetime are roughly 1/3000. The chances of surviving are 9/10. 1/3000x9/10= 9/30000The chances of getting struck by lightning 7 times and surviving are (9/30000)^7=2.187x10^-25That's 0.0000000000000000000000002187% chance. Of course we don't have theists going around and calling Roy Sullivan a Messiah despite the fact that he beat the odds. Theists embrace the fine tuning argument because they don't like chance. -This is too unlikely to have happened. -The universe is too fine tuned to exist just by chance.-The fundamental forces of nature are so precise that if they were even slightly different then the universe as we know it would cease to exist.Atheists have heard that one before. I agree that this argument is a good argument. However, I have to tell you Sunfire, your conclusion is just wrong.The universe as we know it would cease to exist if the fundamental forces were different. True. The universe would look different. And one of the things that the fine tuning argument relies on is the fact the fact that the probability of us existing is so low that something must have designed our universe. But it's not true. It IS all chance. If you shuffle a deck of 52 different cards there are 52! different permutations you can have. That means there 52x51x50...3x2x1 different results you can have. Suppose you shuffle the cards and get a certain result. What was the likelihood of getting such result. 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008065817517% chance. Does that mean that this is some divine permutation. No. It could have been any other permutation.We could have just as well not have existed at all. Life as we know it wouldn't exist if the universe was different but what is life? What are the necessary conditions for life? How can you be sure that life as we don't know it can't exist? I would like to see a theist calculate the probability of life to form. The problem is we don't know. Different conditions in the universe could still allow different life forms to exist. We are the lucky life form. Of course the fine tuning argument can be explained by the multiverse hypothesis. Every universe was formed in different conditions and so different universes could have different laws of physics governing them. We just so happen to live in a universe that can support life, which is what you'd expect since we couldn't exist in a universe that doesn't support life. Finally the fine tuning argument limits God. It states that there are only certain conditions in which he could have created life. What is stopping God from creating life in a black hole to show how powerful he is. The answer is... he doesn't exist.But even if you dismiss all that then still there is a possibility that all of this just happened by chance. As I presented to you unlikely things do happen and if you look at the world around, you can realise that unlikely things are actually likely to occur.Next let's talk about Kalam argument. It never happened to me before. For the first time ever in a debate my opponent agrees with me. Yes my apple argument is flawed. I agree. It was supposed to be flawed. It was supposed to be a poor attempts of explaining reality through logic and intuition. Uncaused cause argument was proposed by Thomas Aquinas who lived in the 13th century. Of course the Uncaused Cause argument would make perfect sense at that time just as much as my apple argument.However now we know that premise one in both my apple argument and the uncaused cause argument are not necessarily true. What if the quantum vacuum is the eternal cause.The Uncaused Cause argument is often used to prove the existence of a spaceless, timeless and immaterial being. However to me this is just a poor attempt to move God away from science. This makes him impossible to disprove. This is why "God exists" is a bad claim. Good claims in their nature are falsifiable as they rely on evidence to be true rather than lack of evidence to be true. How can a spaceless timeless and immaterial being exist? To convince me a theist would have to present to me physical evidence that something spaceless timeless and immaterial can exist. After all such being existed for 0 seconds, takes up 0 space and is made of nothing. No theist was able to do such thing. We know who has the Burden of proof.Let's briefly look at the concept of infinity. My opponent claims that an infinite amount of events could not have happened. But I don't believe that this is necessarily true. Human mind can't grasp the concept of infinity. But that doesn't mean an infinite amount of events can't happen. My opponent has presented some philosophical dilly dally but has yet go show some proper evidence. Now correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure that my opponent believes in an afterlife. He believes that when we die we go to heaven or hell for eternity. Now if we spend an eternity in heaven or hell then given enough time an infinite amount of events could happen since the amount of time we spend in an afterlife is infinite. How is that possible? God did it. Therefore either afterlife is not eternal or the claim that " the series of events in time cannot be actually infinite" is false. Which one is it? I believe it's both. References: Information about Roy Sullivan: https://en.m.wikipedia.org... Statistics on getting struck by lightning: http://www.lightningsafety.noaa.gov... Information about Thomas Aquinas: https://en.m.wikipedia.org...