Videos for people is great.

1. not important 2. wrong, but not important. 3. Only an idiot would do it the exact same way, the EXACT way he does this is different, but he is close enough to others to make it clear that he is in realistic standards not different. I quoted so that you understood what I was talking about, there is nothing to argue here. 4. It irritates me for you to say I brushed off code when I did not (I will go into that later), yet you brush off one of my big points with "I don't understand", you are likely to young to understand the fact that people think about this stuff without help. It is not revolutionary, YOU just don't currently have the ability to do this due to your lack of experience in life. 5. Yet again you don't talk about the main point of my paragraph and talk about something completely different. What I said was that by sending the good of humanity to aliens first would make them accept the bad easier. And no one can comprehend just how enormous space is, but the fact I understand this shows that I understand to an acceptable level just how big space is. This also is way to vague to make a rebuttal too, how would me not understanding this change how the argument goes? say this rather than expecting me to automatically understand the point of such a vague comment. 6. You obviously have not read one of the only things I asked you to. He actually is very philosophically intriguing for this specific comic. If you had read it you would understand my point. He shows the reaction of a man who has realized all the pain and sorrow he has went through was all for the entertainment of others. You might be too young to understand this, but this is an extremely important philosophical argument relating to existence and meaning, though I doubt you have thought too much about this yet. 7. It is the way he puts it, the tone. You really need to listen to what I say rather then just reading it. THINK about it, don't think about how you can craft a rebuttal, think about what I said. That is how to argue. 8. This is not hypnotism, learn what something is before talking about it. And what I said (yet again) is not what you are talking about, you are just restating your own points rather then objecting to mine. 9. This is a blatant argument fallacy. You cannot state that something is good just because it is better then something else. In my personal opinion, Pewdepie sucks. But just because he does does not make this guy any better. And I see why dome people do like Pewdepie, he posts braindead comedy, something that people can just sit back and laugh at. I don't find this very funny myself, but this is why people like him. And your guy posts stuff that people would not laugh at unless they were too young to have already thought this. So I would not be pointing fingers. 10. He is not seen for 3 reasons: 1. he posts videos that are short enough that the YouTube algorithm pushes them from becoming popular and though that is unfair that is just how it works, 2. his target audience is too small, he panders to a young audience, but because he is not popular nor does he do something like gaming kids would have to want to look for his type of comedy, no kids would do this because they don't understand the humor unless they find it randomly and enjoy it, which they can't because they have to look for it to find it, and 3. His humor pushes away other demographics because it talks about something that has already been thought of by those people. He dumbs down his content so that younger people will understand it, plain and simple. Most YouTubers get hate for this yet you say it is good, it is not, it is showing that he is pandering in an attempt to get more views. There is not, but this does not mean he is original, I am saying his STYLE is not original, not unoriginal, not original, he is in the in-between. This is not black and white. He makes it the same because THAT IS THE POINT of his videos, to show popular television in a comedic light. And I was not comparing his video to the channel, if you had actually read what I said you would understand that. I was sing him to talk about how codes in shows and videos are nothing new at all, much less an original idea. The amount of people I have seen in my regular life doing such simple puns like this is enough to prove this point wrong, enough said. These do not need to be heavily discussed. They are all things that everyone does, and do not deserve their own paragraphs. Codes are nothing new, References are a REQUIRMENT for good comedy these days, A Christmas special is the most basic type of video you can have, and this rock and roll guy (this is not worth the time to spell correctly, even with how small a time it is) is nothing much, he is just a basic idea that likely has no story to it and is just meant to be weird to get his young audience to feel creeped out. This is just him whining about how other people watch the popular stuff instead of him, this is meant to make those who watch his videos feel special about nothing. This is no genius, you just don't have the capacity to see what he is doing yet. To conclude this debate I will state how I feel about him rather then just rebuttling. He is a manipulative person that takes advantage of others lack of experience to attempt to get views, and even while doing this his videos are to uninteresting and uninspired to be able to make him popular, so he instead decides to whine about his unpopularity and blame it on everything but himself while doing nothing to better him self or, more importantly, the viewers that watch his shows. You seem too young to understand this but his thoughts are not new or different, the reason you have not heard about this is because you are too young for adults to want to get you thinking philosophically, and you and your peers are to young to think about these ideas for yourselves. So wait until you are a bit older and come up with your own conclusion before wasting time listening to a cookie cutter version from this guy. To those who have read this debate, just see who has created a better overall debate. Because there is no real question to answer here, there never was one. So vote for the better debater rather than wasting time attempting to for an actual question. Thank you