Rape investigations and imprisonments shall be stopped for ever.

The con has not at all provided any reasonable, rational or logical refutations about the argument that I have presented in round #1 and round #2. Instead, the con, due to its severe lack of a human capacity of reasoning, has simply demonstrated a pointless dismissive attitude towards this debate. At this point, it is very questionable if the con really intends to defend its position at all. We will see about it as this argument moves on. The con has again failed to comprehend the fundamental truth that a crime is a crime only because it is "thought to be" or "regarded as" a crime in human society. The con has, even shockingly, has thoroughly misinterpreted the example of slavery posted in my round #2 argument; it was an example to prove the point the aforementioned truth regarding how something is taken to be a crime in a human society. Being a slave and being a raped female are two completely different things. The con obviously lacks an ability to make this crucial differentiation. At this point, one can only hope that the con is trolling. It is interesting that the con brings up the issue of the mental health of raped females. As I explained in my round #2 argument, the purported mental status of raped women following their rape experience is a clear case of how indoctrinated preconceptions are realized. To put it in a more detailed way for a more thorough explanation, raped women (claim to) feel such emotions of trauma, anger, depression, anxiety and so on - all because they have been carefully and consistently brainwashed in advance about rape. The current societal education instill them greatly with all those terrible ideas about getting raped in the female psyche, which linger effectively and forcefully in women even long after the finalization of such education. And, one day she receives rape, all these ideas about rape that brainwashed her come into realization in actuality. That is why women feel such emotions following their rape. The obvious solution to improve this situation is to offer education to women that teach them to view rape in a positive, welcoming and good light, instead of brainwashing them with horrific, negative thoughts about rape. That way, when she gets raped, the positive education and ideologies about rape that has been installed in her head will be properly realized, thus making her feel positive, good about her rape experience. It is a long way, indeed; but it certainly deserves a serious societal effort. After all, rape in itself is not a problem. The con mentions the STDs and surprising pregnancy, rather. But let us take a look at both the STDs and pregnancy: Those events occur in the raped female's body, not in the body of the raping. This is where we have to apply the feminist idea: What happens in her body is her business only, nobody else's. This means that the STDs or pregnancy of hers from rape are only her problems and responsibilities; no other's. Denying this is denying a female's right to her body altogether. The con refuses to recognize that the precious taxpayers' money should be spent in valuable areas for safety of the public, from which rape is excluded. The con has not even provided a persuasive argument as to why the public funds need to be wasted on rape investigations or prosecution; the con just wants to waste the money simply because it is not hers. It is very doubtful that the con would agree to spending taxes on rape-related events if the money was from her own pocket. The con finishes with an irrelevant comment. As the instigator of this debate about a very serious topic. it is very worrisome to witness such pointless attitude. The pro respectfully asks the con to stop trolling and start engaging in this debate with an earnest heart and a thinking brain. This is no place for being mindless and pointless.