Is there ANY evidence to support the existence of Christ

I will start with The Jewish historian Josephus(37 - 101 AD) wrote hundreds and hundreds of pages about first century Judea, including John the Baptist, including other first century Jewish messiahs, but about (Christ), nothing (not counting two little ham-handed forgeries sneaked in later by Eusibus). These are globally accepted as forgeries by religious scholars, please research the subject in depth and you will find there is overwhelming evidence for this conclusion. Here is the basic reasoning: http://www.truthbeknown.com... As for references to the claim that Yeshu in the Talmud refers to Jesus. This Yeshu, according to scholars depicts a disciple of Jehoshua Ben-Perachia at least a century before the alleged Christian Jesus or it may refer to Yeshu ben Pandera, a teacher of the 2nd centuy CE. Regardless of how one interprets this, the Palestinian Talmud didn't come into existence until the 3rd and 5th century C.E. There is no reference to Christ in the first century Midrash There are no references to any of the events mentioned in the New Testament writings by scribes and historians of the time (First Century) such as Philo, Tacitus, Pliny, Suetonius, Epictectus, Cluvius Rufus, Quintus, Curtis Rufus, Josephus, nor the Roman Consul, Publius Petronius. The small mention of a Christus (anointed one) is not a direct reference to Jesus (Christ). As at the time of Tacitus Christians were still part of the Jewish faith and had not yet become Christians. Followers of Serapis, and Osiris were also referred to in the same manner which makes it no more than wishful thinking that the reference was about Jesus (Christ) ref: Suns of God: Krishna, Buddha and Christ Unveiled by by D.M. Murdock/Acharya S Now to some of the historical inaccuracies, Let"s start with evidence for the "Slaughter of the Innocents" ""The Darkness at Crucifixion", "The Roman Census" These are major events that would have been documented by scribes of the time if they had occurred and written about by historians yet they are only mentioned in the religious texts. In the first century there is no Nazareth on any maps or mention in writings. The authors of the Gospels write in third person and describe the thoughts and dreams of the characters as do most fictional stories. The authors of the Gospels contradict each other about important aspects of the story, for example the geneology of Jesus, the death of Judas and the trial of Jesus. If you would read Josephus, Philo, Tacitus you would see the difference between historical written texts vs allegorical fiction. The Gospels are written in the allegorical style 1 The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah,[a] the Son of God,[b] 2 as it is written in Isaiah the prophet: "I will send my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way"[c]" 3 "a voice of one calling in the wilderness, "Prepare the way for the Lord, make straight paths for him.""[d] 4 And so John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. 5 The whole Judean countryside and all the people of Jerusalem went out to him. Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River. 6 John wore clothing made of camel"s hair, with a leather belt around his waist, and he ate locusts and wild honey. 7 And this was his message: "After me comes the one more powerful than I, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. 8 I baptize you with[e] water, but he will baptize you with[f] the Holy Spirit." The Baptism and Testing of Jesus 9 At that time Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. 10 Just as Jesus was coming up out of the water, he saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove. 11 And a voice came from heaven: "You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased." 12 At once the Spirit sent him out into the wilderness, 13 and he was in the wilderness forty days, being tempted[g] by Satan. He was with the wild animals, and angels attended him. Jesus Announces the Good News 14 After John was put in prison, Jesus went into Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God. 15 "The time has come," he said. "The kingdom of God has come near. Repent and believe the good news!" Now let"s look at non fiction writings: We can begin with The Wars of the Jews, by Josephus. WHEREAS the war which the Jews made with the Romans hath been the greatest of all those, not only that have been in our times, but, in a manner, of those that ever were heard of; both of those wherein cities have fought against cities, or nations against nations; while some men who were not concerned in the affairs themselves have gotten together vain and contradictory stories by hearsay, and have written them down after a sophistical manner; and while those that were there present have given false accounts of things, and this either out of a humor of flattery to the Romans, or of hatred towards the Jews; and while their writings contain sometimes accusations, and sometimes encomiums, but no where the accurate truth of the facts; I have proposed to myself, for the sake of such as live under the government of the Romans, to translate those books into the Greek tongue, which I formerly composed in the language of our country, and sent to the Upper Barbarians; Joseph, the son of Matthias, by birth a Hebrew, a priest also, and one who at first fought against the Romans myself, and was forced to be present at what was done afterwards, Now at the time when this great concussion of affairs happened, the affairs of the Romans were themselves in great disorder. Those Jews also who were for innovations, then arose when the times were disturbed; they were also in a flourishing condition for strength and riches, insomuch that the affairs of the East were then exceeding tumultuous, while some hoped for gain, and others were afraid of loss in such troubles; for the Jews hoped that all of their nation which were beyond Euphrates would have raised an insurrection together with them. We can also look at History of Rome, written by the Roman historian Livy around 30 BCE: To begin with, it is generally admitted that after the capture of Troy, whilst the rest of the Trojans were massacred, against two of them--Aeneas and Antenor--the Achivi refused to exercise the rights of war, partly owing to old ties of hospitality, and partly because these men had always been in favour of making peace and surrendering Helen. Their subsequent fortunes were different. Antenor sailed into the furthest part of the Adriatic, accompanied by a number of Enetians who had been driven from Paphlagonia by a revolution and after losing their king Pylaemenes before Troy were looking for a settlement and a leader. The combined force of Enetians and Trojans defeated the Euganei, who dwelt between the sea and the Alps and occupied their land. The place where they disembarked was called Troy, and the name was extended to the surrounding district; the whole nation were called Veneti. Similar misfortunes led to Aeneas becoming a wanderer but the Fates were preparing a higher destiny for him. He first visited Macedonia, then was carried down to Sicily in quest of a settlement; from Sicily he directed his course to the Laurentian territory. Here, too, the name of Troy is found, and here the Trojans disembarked, and as their almost infinite wanderings had left them nothing but their arms and their ships, they began to plunder the neighbourhood. The Aborigines, who occupied the country, with their king Latinus at their head came hastily together from the city and the country districts to repel the inroads of the strangers by force of arms It should be very clear the difference between historical style texts vs allegorical style texts