BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
AOW War Scenario: Pakistan (pro) vs Italy (con)

July 6th Italy is chosen to attack Pakistan, and calls up PM Greatkitteh July 7th Italy, having a stronger navy, Decide to attack the Arabian sea with planes, Quickly defeating all bases in the coastline. Italy then pays Iran $ 5 billion and attacks with a modern Tank-helicopter army, but stops at the rows of millitary bases. India, A country With Hostilities, allow Italy to send troops there. Infantry with planes and Self-propelled guns attack Lahore. Italy then raids and steal an helicopter from Pakistan. Casualties Italy: 23 attack aircraft, 3 fighter jets Pakistan: 100,000 troops, 10 tanks, 3 frigates, 1 patrol craft, 12 helicopters (attack) July 8th Fresh off victory and morale, Italy starts Cyber warfare, Quickly bugging radars. Pakistan then is falsely informed an general is a spy, And kills of 6. Morale is in ruins. July 10th Reserves are called up and trained, And so is mass manufacturing. $5 billion is added for massive reform, To have air and sea upper-hand. As it is evident Italy has a stronger navy, Total blockade is formed. Casualties Italy: 2 frigates, Pakistan:, 4 frigates, $3 billion July 11th A wave of hacks is attacked on Pakistan, and Italy , with it`s AFV stronger, Sends 2,000 to constantly attack the capital. casualties: Pakistan: 50 dead July 13th 500,000 newly trained troops decide on hit-and-run tactics at Karachi. July 15th Italy falsely Informs Pakistan that it`s sonar's are jammed. Pakistan wastes $1 billion making fixes. Italy uses this time to fortify areas, And make a deal with china. China agrees to let Italy put troops there, for $1 billion and tangible gold. Italy gives some oil as well. July 16th Because Pakistan oil is hard to get, Italy fires missiles at oil fields, July 17th Italy now has Secured the Iranian Front, taking land until the string of bases, And the Arabian sea front, up to sukar. The Two fronts are easy and un-fortified. However, The Indian front and the Chinese front will be the real fortified and bloody front. Italy adds a 100,000 more troops to advance to quetta. All of Italy`s troops are in Pakistan, Although some are left behind. July 18th Pakistan is falsely informed of sabotage, and kills 10,000 men. Italy`s cyber warfare allows it to give Pakistan false things easily. July 19th Pakistan morale is down after it`s purge. July 20th Pakistan realizes it`s big blunder, Only having one side fortified, leading easy attack by Iran. It`s to late, And morale is down. July 25th Italy calls for a cease-fire of a week July 26th the EU and UN give Italy secret permission to breach the cease-fire. Italy builds bases and trenches, And secretly do some hit-and runs July 27th Italy breaks the cease-fire by quickly seizing Islamabad, burning it down. Radars were jammed. casualties Italy: 50,000 troops, 10 fighter jets, 20 tanks, 5 Armored vehicles Pakistan: 100,000 troops, 20 fighter jets, 10 planes, 10 tanks, $ 99 million, 25 Armored vehicles, 2 towed artillery.
AOW War Scenario: Pakistan (pro) vs Italy (con)

Thanks for the debate :). Pakistan MANPOWER Going beyond military equipment totals and perceived fighting strength is the actual manpower that drives a given military. Wars of attrition favor those with more. Total Population: 196,174,380 Available Manpower: 93,351,401 Fit for Service: 75,326,989 Reaching Military Age Annually: 4,342,629] Active Frontline Personnel: 617,000 Active Reserve Personnel: 515,000 LAND SYSTEMS Tank value includes Main Battle Tanks, light tanks and tank destroyers, either wheeled or tracked. AFV value includes Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs) and Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs). Tanks: 2,924 Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFVs): 2,828 Self-Propelled Guns (SPGs): 465 Towed-Artillery: 3,278 Multiple-Launch Rocket Systems (MLRSs): 134 AIR POWER Includes both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft from all branches of service. Total Aircraft: 914 Fighters/Interceptors: 387 Fixed-Wing Attack Aircraft: 387 Transport Aircraft: 278 Trainer Aircraft: 170 Helicopters: 313 Attack Helicopters: 48 NAVAL POWER Aircraft Carrier value includes dedicated "helicopter carrier" vessels. Total naval strength includes all known auxiliaries as well. Total Naval Strength: 74 Aircraft Carriers: 0 Frigates: 10 Destroyers: 0 Corvettes: 0 Submarines: 8 Coastal Defense Craft: 12 Mine Warfare: 3 RESOURCES (PETROLEUM) Despite the advances made in battlefield technology, oil remains the lifeblood of any fighting force as well as local economy. Oil Production: 60,000 bbl/day Oil Consumption: 430,000 bbl/day] Proven Oil Reserves: 247,500,000 bbl/day LOGISTICAL War is as much a battle of logistics - moving man and machine from points all over - as it is direct combat. Labor Force reflects possible wartime industry strength. Labor Force: 59,210,000 Merchant Marine Strength: 11] Major Ports and Terminals: 2 Roadway Coverage: 260,760 Railway Coverage: 7,791 Serviceable Airports: 151 FINANCIAL (in USD) Regardless of military strength in numbers, war is still driven by financing as much as any one leader or weapon. Defense Budget: $7,000,000,000 External Debt: $52,430,000,000 Reserves of Foreign Exchange and Gold: $11,180,000,000 Purchasing Power Parity: $574,100,000,000 GEOGRAPHY (in km) Geographical values primarily figure into a defensive-minded war (i.e. invasion). Square Land Area: 796,095 km Coastline: 1,046 km Shared Border: 7,257 km Waterways: 25,220 km July 1st 2015 The European Union strongly continues to condemn Pakistan for continuing to carry out executions by hanging of its death row inmates. Pakistan vows to continue, and builds up its millitary even stronger. July 4th 2015 Shafqat Hussain is hanged despite worldwide objections and the EU is outraged along with the UN. July 5th 2015 Pakistan's millitary seizes executive powers, and prepares for a showdown with the EU and UN on the death penalty and its millitary rule.
vi_spex competition

sound=valid=objectobject is true; true=matter=1=fact. i just looked at my dog, is that a fact?if you, believe that i didnt just look at my dog, what is your position on my claim..a(theism)=dis(belief)=theism=belief=be lie=false.believe (be lie) that i looked at my dog, is false(0).you agree with me then :)
vi_spex competition

0=false=information1=matter=truefalse=opposite of reality. reality=real=true; reality=opposite of false. false=opposite of true.0=/= truth in sense; truth=10=no apple in handapple in 4 pieces=object=matter=10+1=1 is false equation. pick up 0 sodas from the floor. can't add nothing(0) to 1.0+1=0; 1=1all parts of something=matter=something=1"for nut shell to exist, 0!=1"; 0(false)=1(truth), concede my point. "true=true!=false", concede my point.
vi_spex competition

Con assertion is false, as opposite of true, reality. Think about it - truth = opposite of reality = apposite of false. you can't pick up 0 sodas off floor, 0*6(6). therefore although correct true=1, 0=false!=make an apple nothing. 0= apple in 4 pieces = 0 apples, 4 pieces0 = truth in sense1 = no apple in hand,If you pick up 0 sodas off of floor, you have 0 soda, or cut soda in to bits of soda, then still 0 sodas. Pick 0 sodas off of floor. having all parts of something = not something, as something is opposite of 0, 0=nothing. parts=0 of whole you see? LIKEWISE, true not= flase, truth is opposite of false, as seomthing in existence has an opposite for it to exist, as in senses, as in nut. for nut shell to exist, 0!=1, truth=true!=false
vi_spex competition

I accpet and look forward to doing this debate. there is good, reasons to do this debate. i, intend to, win.reason+intent=morality=right=truthtruth=winner=be most like vi_spexThe-Voice-of-Truth=truth, truth is in name.truth=10=false, make an apple nothingfalse=0=belief=be lie=god, as i have to imagine it.information=00+1=1 is false equation, pick up 0 sodas from the floor.0+1=1=0; 1=0information=0,1information=0=falseinformation=1=truthtruth=falsethe-voice-of-truth=truth=false=belief=be lie=godbow down.. you crazy person :)
Trump

First of all, I support O'Malley, but that isn't important. It looks like this debate comes down to Trump's stance on immigration. I showed clear harms from racism - shattered communities, (look at Ferguson if you want proof lol) poor mental and physical health, economic downturns, etc. If Trump becomes president and embraces racism, all these impacts will go nationwide. My opponent has no response to this, so insofar as I can prove Trump is racist, you vote neg. And I showed clear evidence of that, but if you want more, here's how illegal immigrants are treated. Source 3: (http://revcom.us...) These Minutemen inspired by rightwing Republican Pat Buchanan's claim that urgent action is needed to preserve the U.S. as an ethnically white, Christian-European nation. (...) The cold-blooded vigilante attacks on immigrants aren't a new development. Ranchers in Arizona have killed undocumented immigrants for years. They have terrorized them, hunted them down with dogs, and handed them over to the Border Patrol at gunpoint. (...) they have developed deep ties with powerful forces high in the government"and are operating in the era where any paranoid appeal for more security quickly gets official backing and a public hearing. (...) Mile by mile, walls and barbed wire have cut off Mexico from the United States, forcing more and more immigrants to cross over in the dangerous desolate stretches of border in Arizona. It has created an intense conflict zone, as desperate immigrant workers try to cross and survive, and an intensified government crackdown hunts them through the dry hills to trap them, capture them, (...) this reactionary Minuteman movement has emerged to demand even more extreme and violent actions against the immigrants. They have criticized the proposals made by President Bush and Mexico's President Vicente Fox to create a legal program for bringing Mexican immigrants into the U.S. So these Minutemen kill and hunt down not only illegal immigrants, but also innocent Americans. Clearly more anti immigration laws will simply fuel more racism, and the death of innocent people. So since Trump will cause more terrible organizations like this to form, please vote neg - vote down Trump.
Trump

So why you dont support him is because he supports america and wants to keep it safe. First of all what do you have against the wall. it would be harder for illegal immagrants to come into our country and 2 He was not referring to mexicans. he was referring to illegals and not just mexicans but middle eastern and all over the worlds illegals. And He would create so many jobs for americans and latinos and whoever. And the only reason you dislike him is because you think hes racist nothing other than him being racist. And might i ask who do you support.hIllary bernie heck even o mallay.
Trump

Trump is the most openly racist Presidential candidate since pre Civil Rights. Source 1: (http://theweek.com...) here comes Donald Trump, who started his campaign by ranting about how Mexican immigrants are rapists and drug dealers (...) After a Black Lives Matter protester was punched and kicked at a Trump rally, Trump said "Maybe he should have been roughed up." And he retweeted a graphic with fake statistics about black people supposedly murdering whites, which turns out to have been created by a neo-Nazi. (...) the thing Trump is trying to communicate with this story. (...) Your Muslim friends and neighbors? They're not the assimilated, patriotic Americans they want you to believe. They're not regular people with jobs and families and lives like yours. They're a threat, people to be surveilled and harassed and hated and feared. (...) the most disheartening thing of all: not that there's a candidate willing to make these repugnant appeals, but that so many Republican voters hear them and cheer. And, racism is wrong. Source 2: (https://itstopswithme.humanrights.gov.au...) Racism has a significant impact both on the individuals who experience it and the wider community. Research shows that there are significant links between experiences of racism and discrimination and poor physical and mental health, reduced productivity and reduced life expectancy. Further, it is well-recognised that racism presents barriers to social and economic participation which can in turn cause social exclusion and entrench disadvantage, sometimes for generations. (...) It harbours mistrust. It incites hatred. It stops the word 'community' in its tracks. Trump's rhetoric is dangerous and will destroy the US. It destroys communities, causes crime, etc. Why would you EVER support Trump?
Child Limit Law

1) First of all, child limit laws would be, in no way "inherently unjust" As your own statistics stated, "The average family has 1.89 children. " The child limit could be two children instead one. That would also stop world population. There are families who are having a lot of children, and these are things that should be stopped. 2) "Child limit would cause higher abortion rate" If we have a child limit law of two children or less, then I'm sure parents could handle that. I highly dought people could accidentally have three or more children. But let's say a couple accidentally had a third baby. They could give that baby to a family that doesn't have two or less. 3) US sets an example The U. S. A is one of the leading countries in the world. So I'm sure that if we do this, then other countries would follow suit which would be a very effective way to keep us from overpopulation. 4)"(But my opponent's claim of leading to starvation and poverty is completely false)" I must apologize, but this is one of the craziest statements I have ever read. If there are people on earth than there are that many more people who cannot eat, more people that are in poverty, and faster flow of disease. Think of it this way: If there are more people then disease can spread more through out the earth. 5) The earth has limited resources that cannot sustain us forever. I think it is our duty to stop overpopulation for our future generations. And there are only two ways to do this. We could either increase the death rate, which I think would be brutal and unethical. Or we could decrease the birth rate which would be an ethical easy way to decrease overpopulation.
Child Limit Law

My opponent has made a very convincing argument however I do not think he has completely argued my points. 1)My opponent is looking at the starvation, poverty, and other negative things as just the U.S. I am talking about the entire world overpopulating. In 2050 scientists predict the world will reach an incredible height of 9.1-10 Billion people. http://www.un.org... Over population will occur with 12 billion people. It doesn't matter how we use our renewable resources, not everything is going to bountiful. Millions more people will not have access to fresh water, heat, electricity and etc.. 2) You stated that theses child limit laws are unethical. But I'm sure, even you would agree it will be much more unethical to let our grandchildren hold the burden of our irresponsibility.
Is Facebook good or bad for the world.

Argument Facebook is Dangerous Addiction Facebook is becoming one of the biggest addiction problem for the students around the world. Everyday students in Middle School, High School, College, and now even elementary school are now addicted to a so called socializing website. With out knowing a person wastes hours after hours on Facebook scouring for new notification and new messages. Facebook creates horrible situation in school and destroys ones life slow, but gradually. One student might forget to study for the finals because the student decided to post the new awesome, crazy video that the student found. More than ever Facebook is becoming something harmful to the society with the way they trap their users in their website. Facebook has No Privacy Facebook is a dangerous social network because of all the strangers that can see your private information. In 2010 a New Zealand hacker has infiltrated about 1.5 million Facebook accounts, this is Facebook can do for its users by letting them being hacked into and almost being sold into the Black Market. Privacy is approximately all gone in what use to be the famous Facebook. Source:. http://ohmygov.com... Facebook Users are Mostly Students and Being Affected in a Harmful Way Facebook users are mostly students even the pro of this argument is a student addicted to Facebook. Facebook is dangerous for the society because the students now spend more time on Facebook than doing their homework whick affects the life of the students. A study made by the Ohio State University states that the Facebook student users have lower GPA than regular students. If you look what is happening to our future generation you realize Facebook way more harmful than we use to believe. Facebook is dangerous with no doubt it is becoming more influence over the new generation of leaders that will lead us out of the crisis we have created. Facebook is now wasting students lives when they could be pursuing their goals.
Resolved:The US should allow animal testing...If its for scientific reasons only

My opponent has forfeited the round. If he comes back this next one, I would like it if he responded to my argument. In regards to the comment about what would be non-scientific testing, I believe I can answer that. There is no such thing as non-scientific as technically everything can be said to be "scientific". However, if we're talking about knowledge beneficial to humanity, then I personally consider cosmetic testing to be non-scientific.
Resolved:The US should allow animal testing...If its for scientific reasons only

I stand on these 3 main points 1:This has many benefits to America 2:More testing=More/better outcome for the U.S 3:For knowledge sake Contention 1:This has many benefits -Subpoint A:Many medical benifits Back in 1996 Dolly the sheep, was produced at the Roslin Institute as part of research into producing medicines in the milk of farm animals. Researchers have managed to transfer human genes that produce useful proteins into sheep and cows, so that they can produce, for instance, the blood clotting agent factor IX to treat haemophilia or alpha-1-antitrypsin to treat cystic fibrosis and other lung conditions. The development of cloning technology has led to new ways to produce medicines and is improving our understanding of development and genetics. (http://www.animalresearch.info...) EXPLAIN:So this clearly shows the medical advances are endless Contention 2:People are dying because this is not legalized -Subpoint A:More testing=More/better outcome for the U.S Here are some listed examples of how animal testing has helped us... 1796 Smallpox vaccine developed Cow 1881 Anthrax vaccine developed Sheep 1885 Rabies vaccine developed Dog, Rabbit 1902 Lifecyle of Malaria discovered Pigeon 1919 Immunity mechanisms discovered Rabbit, Horse, Guinea Pig 1921 Insulin discovered Dog, Fish 1932 Neuron function discovered Cat, Dog 1933 Tetanus vaccine developed Horse 1939 Anticoagulants developed Cat 1954 Polio vaccine developed Mouse, Monkey 1956 Open-heart surgery & pacemakers developed Dog 1964 Cholesterol regulation discovered Rat 1973 Social & behavioral patterns in animals discovered Fish, Bee, Bird 1982 Leprosy treatment developed Armadillo 1990 Organ transplant techniques advanced Dog, Pig, Sheep, Cow 1997 Prions discovered & characterized Hamster, Mouse 2000:Brain signal transduction discovered Sea Slug, Mouse, Rat 2002:Cell death mechanism discovered:Worm (http://cflegacy.research.umn.edu...) Contention 3:We need to legalize this for knowlage sake -Subpoint A:Knowlage can save lives! This point is basicly common sence if you about something(Knowlage) like a virus BUT, You need to know more what do you do? You experiment/you figure it out. This is all we would be doing just expanding our knowlage to benifit america And for those points I stand on the aff side on this resoluction. THANKS FOR READING AND GOOD LUCK TO MY OPPONET :)
Best house at Hogwarts (Gryffindor)

Con never refuted any of my arguments. So I will attempt to refute theirs.Gryffindor is still the best house because it is good to be brave and it helped them beat VoldermortGryffindor wasn't the only house who helped beat Voldermort. The other three houses helped as well. Even Slytherin did.SLyerthins are evil, and they helped voldermort kill innocent people.Pro is generalizing the whole house as evil. There were good Slytherins such as Horace Slughorn, Severus Snape, Regulus Black.Gryffindor also the best at qudditch.Gryffindor is not the best at qudditch. It prior to Harry Potters arrival, Slytherin had won 7 years in a row. Without Harry Potter, Gryffindor is pretty bad. This is evident in Harry's first year, when he got injured and was unable to play the last game, In which Gryffindor suffered their worst defeat.http://harrypotter.wikia.com...http://harrypotter.wikia.com...http://harrypotter.wikia.com...http://harrypotter.wikia.com...http://harrypotter.wikia.com...http://harrypotter.wikia.com...;
Best house at Hogwarts (Gryffindor)

I must disagree that Gryffindor is the "best" house, and that Slytherin is the greatest house in my opinion.Since Pro hasn't explained what their idea of best is, I shall go over my idea of best.My idea of best revolves around what is practical for the outside world,If I imagine none of the events in Harry Potter occured.Traits of a Gryffindor Bravery Nerve Chivalry Courage Daring Strong of Will Traits of a Slytherin Resourcefulness Cunning Ambition Leadership qualities Self-Preservation Determination Cleverness Fraternity Power Resourceful- having the ability to find quick and clever ways to overcome difficulties.This trait is highly useful in real life, as many of will have difficulites in the future. This is part of human nature, and If Slytherins are experts at this.Cunning- Many of us think of that this is a negative trait, but it also can be a postive one. Cunningness is what helped us defeat the Nazis, which proves it can also be used for good purposes.Ambition- Being ambitious is a a good thing. It allows us to strive for our best, and acheive greatness. This is related to bravery, which is a Gryffindor trait.I'm not going over the other one, as these three resemble all of them. Overall, I think these traits are more important to mankind, and these traits will make them a better person. Almost all of the traits that Gryffindor's have are very similar, and don't make the person better.
Abortion is murder.

Abortion, legally, is not murder. I have 5 minutes to type this so it will be brief.Murder is defined as a unlawfully killing someone [1], and abortion is legal in the US and most countries.It is easy to draw the conclusion that abortion is technically not murder.P1) Abortion is legal.P2) Anything that is legal is not murder.C1) Abortion is not murder.[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...;