You pick

A. Everyone works for money not for the sake of money, but for the abstract things it represents such as food, water, and pleasure. The vast majority of people are not looking to get filthy rich to any means other than the goals that they have for themselves, so most people would stop once they are satisfied. To work for the sake of money is a trait that is seen with groups of people who are more caught up in status symbols and lack the ability to think critically about what they really want. And as for getting rich through criminal means, most people would be loathe to do that because they perceive themselves to be good honest people and self-righteously hold themselves to that standard. As for money running the world, it doesn't. It is only a measure of what really does run the world like gold, silver, and other resources. The value of money is constantly changing based on how much of those things are present in the country where that currency is used. So if you really want to run the world, gather nukes and rare items and develop your own currency. Again, in order to prove that people want money, you would have to survey 7 billion people and establish that, but when people answer surveys asking what they truly value, the top answers are things like family, safety, justice, and fun, but I have not yet seen a single body of research that has put 'wealth' as the only top value. B. That's wonderful, but you did not prove my original point about how your claim to be a world class criminal can be taken seriously. So far, I have not seen evidence that you are anything beyond average or faintly above average at best. As for why I am on here, I am just honest enough to admit that I am not Stephen Hawking and I need to sharpen myself in order to become great. Humility is a world class quality that drives people to develop world class skill, and without that quality, one can never be any better than they are. The fact that you have shown more evidence for lacking humility than having it, throws doubt to how you can really have world class skill. C. In order to create staff who are loyal to a criminal, you would have to brainwash them into thinking that there is no other way out. While this strategy can work for a while, it will not work for long. All you need is one person who has doubts to question the wrong person about it and your organization is toast. Similar things have happened to other criminal organizations. The people who have been successful as professional criminals are small groups of independent contractors, whereas nearly every large mob of cartel has been stopped or at least discovered. Like I said, whether you play the kingpin mob boss or the independent hitman, you are only minimizing one risk while maximizing another. And considering that not only you are speaking from personal experience, but also that you have not proven your status as a real life criminal, the bulk of your argument for this point is little more than fictional, invented absurdity. And about the moral alignment system, I was saying that it is unscientific rubbish that is not valid for a serious intellectual argument. A better alternative would be to drop the whole Lawful good, chaotic evil 9 type psychobabble, and instead measure them separately as lawfulness and benevolence on 2 Continuous scales, or better yet, consider the whole thing the fiction that it is and conform to contemporary psychological research on morality.