Bible has Flaws

Well I think I need to come at this in a whole new way, my topic of my debate is the bible has flaws, I am for meaning I show that the bible has flaws in its teachings, such as contradictions, etc.... My opponent is con trying to prove the bible has no flaws. Now my whole attention of these arguements are showing contradictions in the christian bible, well my opponent brought up the catholic bible, then korea, all other types of bibles. When my topic and my explanations and proven verses of contradictions supports my topic, Why at the end of each contradiction and flaw I point out I do state that the bible have flaws. So i keep my debate revelant to my topic, as i explained in the first round about this debate, was for me to show proof that the bible has flaws, this could mean contradicitons, using any resource available, never specify a certian bible, for a bible is a bible. I could use anything i please even the bible itself as a source of proving there are flaws and contradictions of the bible. My opponent which still fails to show but yet in terms agree with me in some spots of his arguements, but as con is suppose to show how the bible has no flaws what so ever,, and nor contradictions, that the book is truely non flawless, for he has failed to show there are no contradictions, also he is able to use any source he pleases, meaning any type of bible, or website. For all the contradictions I pointed out showing the bible has flaws, but yet he claims that I am not viewing the KJV bible to prove any flaws and contradictions. He states this version of the bible christian bible, but i also mention to him that I was using the KJV and NKJV as findings of contradictions and flaws upon the bible. Yet my opponent still has not proved me any different of mind the bible is perfect with no flaws. KJ does not see them as legitimate words from God, due to historical, factual, and doctrine errors. AKA tampered. My opponent said this in his last arguement. but what my opponent do not realise the word of god is the word of god no matter what bible. He telling me the difference when he is failing to show me the evidence of the bible not being flaw, when most people now tries to debate heres is an example tries to debate a christian, something like this, christiains most likely start denying the word of god but they do not realise it, To sit there and say well this version is not the word of god but this version is, this other one is false but this one is not false, thats saying since one bible is not the other but one denies one from the other they right away deny the word of god. A bible is a bible, since all these christians speak of perfection and the bible is always right and there are no flaws to the bible, but when it comes down to the point of proving right away religion attacks themselves, throwing all signs away from true religion. one thats believe in the word of god. Who to say to your religions that and say catholic is wrong, but christian is right, or christian is right but catholic is wrong. If your christian you disapprove of the catholic BIBLE, or the catholics of the christians. that shows flaw in religion and in the bible itself, for the bible states from religion its the word of god, so when god said in the catholic bible this is his word, are you denying his word, or lets say in christian bible that one is god word, and in both books there both gods words according to the bible itselves. So when you try to prove the bible has no flaws and no contradictions were does your arguement stand to proving the bible has no flaws, but yet both say word of god, but as you say its misprinted or tainted by men. I hope you understanding what i am saying, this debate is about the bible has flaw and im for that and right now Im the only one showing you contradictions of the bible leading to the not perfect book and many flaws to the bible. Your so quick to attack catholics when its about the bible not religion. Both books are said from religion they are the word of god. they both have bible at the end of the religion, so one to say one is reworded, also has doctrine errors. AKA tampered your saying that all bibles are like that, why When i posted on my topic i was talking about the bible is flaw, when i listed you can use any resource you want, I mainly used Christian bible as a source with common sense logic to show my points on how the bible is flaw showing contridictions. My opponent tries to debate off topics not showing how the bible holds no flaws, the only basic arguement he had was God said so, God word is not false, but yet showing no evidence from sources, or anything that the bible doesnt not contridicts itself. A bible is a Bible. if a bible is not a bible regardless the religion then please tell me what the difference of a bible from a bible is... All those things I pointed of flaws and contradictions were just showing you my evidence from your own christian book how it has flaws, not debating what he said or she said, but only showing you verses, and verses of what one book said in the bible to what another book said into the same bible Aka christrian bible.Voters as you can see my opponent still fails to do what he is suppose to do and that is show how the bible has no flaws, no contradictions, but he has been contradicting himself in this whole debate, when you read what my opponent says he downs a bible, just not cause its not his bible he reads, when a bible is a bible regardless the religion, in the end they believe in a higher being. making the bible to what according to religion says the word of god or there god no matter what god or who god it is, my opponent still says a different bible is falsy made, and is tampered, meaning he has proven to me and my viewers that the bible has flaws. Unless he can show that the bible has no flaws no contradictions. I've shown verses, I've shown my proof, even websites showing him the bible i was using and that was the christian bible. but i could of been using the catholic, or hebrew, or muhmad bible if i wanted too, to prove there are flaws and contradictions of the bible. but of courtesy I used the christian bible more. to show flaws to that bible, and contradictions. I know i continued to argue some of the things my opponent has argued, but I felt like I should of said something since there are only two rounds left. To remind my opponent that he is suppose to show us there are no flaws, no contradictions. not trying to prove the bible is true, as my opponent said its what you believe, but this is not about forcing religion this is a simple debate of proving the bible has no flaws or contradictions. We can go on and on about the side topics brought up but as you can see i did state at the end of each statement that shows the flaw or shows the contraditiction of the bible making my point. and my evidence. So my opponent has two more rounds, I felt like he needed to read the first round and what i said, and read the topic for he is against the bible having flaws, but also see there are no specific source you can use anything. meaning any bible, he suppose to show how the bible has no flaws nor contradictions. the way he stated somethings there are flaws, and contradictions of the bible. I ask my opponent to re read my topic and my first round. I also want to let my viewers know I have shown contradictions, and flaws of the bible.