The utter silliness of god, the bible and why you should not believe in god

OK if you are going to continue to be a total frickin fallacies moron without the ability to debate as thus far as I have discovered here as is true with all christians because they somehow have their head in the sand with goose eggs turned to stone from their bottoms up, then I am just not even going to bother with you. Remember my first few sentences before you rambunctiously emprawled yourself into this debate? Recall it if you would be so kind. And if I find that you do not use intelligence and make things up to make your measly ratteth a$$eth look high in the sky like a virgin trophy, I will most certainly end our excursions. I have better things to do than to debate with someone who has to flatly lie and invent excuses in order to maintain his little charade to keep his barn door open. Thankfully I do not even need to go beyond that because how how ignorant you are with the first verse" Matthew 19:12 IS physically impossible. You didn"t even look it up you dimwitted dullard snot meat sow. Now how can a castrated person, that being of a eunuch/ a male be born from their mother"s womb? No need to even bother with even trying to actually get into trying to make an attempt into what on earth how you are trying to defend yourself in for which there is absolutely no defense because that verse is so sick and disgusting. You lose. NEXT: OK then Judges 1:19 is not a misprint. So god does not have power over chariots of Iron. That means that god is not a god and there are somethings in his bible that he is powerless against. That also proves that this god, who is obviously man made, because of this verse and many other verses, it proves this god to be imperfect. Oh I didn't even bother to read what you scrolled down because after your first sentence on this verse, you neatly proved yourself wrong. NEXT Now I"ve really got to read your stupidity here" Why would god only send one jesus? if you answer stupidly and ignorantly I will absolutely end this debate and I will have obviously won this debate because I do not debate with losers who clearly do not know what they are squawking about. Oh and btw, who cares what the bible says? Its an obvious incorrect text. All---of---it. Why? Because no supreme deity such as your obvious man made god would ever rely on text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication. Now who cares what the bible says in regards to whether or not your god sent only one christ" it does not match any reasoning, thinking, rationalizing, common sense, nor logical human being. That"s because your god, religion, nor bible requires a single ounce of it. Naturally when I posted the reasoning for why it was absolutely required that this obvious man made god should have spitted out more than one jesus, rather than having the world suffer in turmoil because of it, he totally ignored logical thinking, reasoning, rationalizing, and common sense in which he has none. "Pro erroneously claims, concerning God and Christ's death on the cross, "HERE"S THE KICKER, HE COULD HAVE DONE IT HIMSELF!"" Wow well god could have done it himself. OK then according to my opponent then god is not god. Simple. God lacks the power to do things himself such as come on down and save--the--world! No he requires henchmen to do it for him. Or is that the truth of it? Nope. Because in the OT how many times, let me repeat that, how many times did god come on down and do things himself such as massive genocides as an example you total fricken prick who knows absolutely nothing about his god nor bible? So he just contradicted himself in a major way. Now do you want me to list the massive genocides and murders that your obvious man made god committed in your horrific bible committed HIMSELF? Oh but wait, my opponent cannot even prove his god exists. Once again my idiot opponent who knows nothing about his god bible and religion only show up with lack-there-of-silliness to prove himself to be high strung on cheesewhiz origamis bathroom figurines. Now lets have some fun "Multiple passages inform us that this Christ who dies on the cross for the sins of the world"" Really? According to what imbecile? Him? How would he know? What grade of concrete leather priests bunched up in tourister luggage electoral college has he graduated from in order to make this assumption? Here"s what his bible stated about sin: Does every man sin? Yes. There is no man who does not sin (I Kings 8:46; see also 2 Chronicles 6:36; Proverbs 20:9; Ecclesiastes 7:20; and I John 1:810) No. True Christians cannot possibly sin, because they are the children of God. Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is a child of God.. (I John 5:1). We should be called children of God; and so we are (I John 3: 1). He who loves is born of God (I John 4:7). No one born of God commits sin; for Gods nature abides in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God (I John 3:9). But, then again, Yes! If we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us (I John 1:8) ""First of all, how does a non-existent person cause anything?" Well That has got to be one of the dumbest questions of all time. You probably don"t even know that the earth orbits the sun. How many characters in The Big Red Book and in the Big Blue Book cause one heckuva lot? It starts your entire raising of the ability to read. How many Shakespearean characters causes something? Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet etc etc etc. See, you do not have the ability whatsoever to rationalize, think, reason, use common sense nor use logic. Hey you"ve got everything for you in your little black book. Right? And YOU CANNOT venture outside of it. Absolutely not have you provided evidence for god. Nobody, not one person has. Not ever. If so it would be the biggest wind bag thing in history. Your god would be plastered all over the news, all over every single TV station, on every single itty bitty bit of information bit that the internet provides, in other words - every single media outlet ever dreampt. So why hasn"t this happened? Its not happened because your god does not exist. There"s not been one whiff of him. Not one sighting. Not one wind blowing in the wind. Not one little squashed eggshell of proof of him since his man made invention. And why should there be? Especially since he truly hates children? He hates gays, women, causes known genocides for absolutely no reason at all, hates raped women etc etc. Hey well wow that's virtually half the planet. All you have is something as ridiculous as faith. And faith is ---never--- proof of anything. All you have is your little blank black book filled with books, chapters and verses. Now you go right ahead and you prove god physicality out of those books, chapters and verses. Oh whatsamatter sparky, you can't do it? Why not? Its because your god does not exist. Wow you must think you are smarter than creationists. Sure you do. So you unlike they, you would put god on trial again. Is that your story? They won't. Do you know why they won't? Its because they have no proof for god's existence and they know it. All they have is faith based oriented. And faith is never proof. There's nothing tangible about your god. Nothing distinguishable about your god from air. So you go right ahead and you put your god on trial again and then you see how far it gets you since you think you have proof for your god's existence. Since you had to flatly lie and thus invent excuses in order to clearly gain attention, and since I am clearly several hundred pay grades above you, I'm not going to bother with you nor with this debate anymore. I simply do not have the time nor the effort to deal with someone who clearly does not know his bible but has to invent excuses and lie in order to maintain his stature as a structure above anyone who he believes is easy bait. Well he got caught with a stinger in a gelatin mold of spears and is really not intelligent at all, nor is he edumacated. My time with my opponent is done. Thanx. Matt Dillahunty "Why is it that the Gideons are putting bible"s around in every hotel rooms when modern people cannot possibly reach the proper conclusions and cannot understand it? Why is it that you have to become an expert in dead languages and archeology in order to have any rational foundation to believe this? Because it doesn"t make sense with the model. Let"s imagine for a moment that I"m god and that I made the colossal list of errors that lead me to the point where I decided that the best solution to have a portion of me come down and take human form and be tortured and and be killed to serve as a substitute for other animal slaughter to make up for sins and then I spend a portion of a weekend dead and then I get to come back with me and be with me forever. Let"s set aside that makes any sense. If it did in fact happen and if it were IMPORTANT and it were the most IMPORTANT thing people could possibly question, if it were the most important thing people could EVER understand properly, WHY would I EVER allow all the originals to go away, no eyewitnesses, no authorship, no way to verify this information, no bible 2.0, no bible 3.0, and why doesn"t god show up and say "hang on a minute this is important, here"s what actually happened." None of that makes any sense. And whether or not there was a real person behind this one has to wonder if this makes any sense at all. Only an idiot, an idiot, would proceed with the most important question and not give sufficient evidence for it. And allow this issue to be debated for millennia and allow it to divide families and homes. This is a question of truth. In much the same way people are dismissive about conversation this past week "oh its just politics" no its not politics, it values, its about what kind of world you want to live in. Dismissing it as politics "well it doesn"t really matter what we know what jesus said." YES IT DOES!!! And the modern churches belf on what Paul said anyway.