Resolved: A 12-0 Boise State team should play in the national championship

Well he didnt exactly follow the format I asked for but whatever. I'll attack my opponents arguments then present my own. His argument is basically that OSU and Bama deserve it over BSU if all 3 go undefeated, with schedules being the main warrant. Fine, lets make this about schedules. He references Alabama's win over "elite programs" Penn State and Florida. It should be obvious to college football fans that these two teams cannot be considered great wins at this point in time. Penn State is starting a freshman QB who's only decent game came against Youngstown State. Also, if you're any good at all, you should be able to score more than three points against a team starting 8 bench players from last year's defense, ranked #1 or not. Duke scored more against Bama then Penn State did. And that is not counting Duke's garbage TD against Bama's 3rd string. Florida is obviously an offensive mess who cant run, pass, or snap with any kind of consistency. He references OSU beating Miami, Michigan, and Iowa. Miami is a good win albeit against the most overrated QB in the nation. I dont care if its added pressure in a rivalry. Michigan was terrible and had the worst defense in their history at the time. Iowa was playing on the road with their (terrible) backup quarterback, and still almost won. Also, since he's going to make references to their wins from last year, lets talk about their other games. They got beat at home against a USC team that had 4 losses and was their most disappointing team in recent memory, only scoring 16 points against a defense that gave up MANY more points against supposedly weaker offenses. They also had an embarrassing loss to Purdue, which exposed Pryor and the Ohio State offense in general. Then he talks about how Boise's opponents are unimpressive. 1. I wont deny, VT's loss to JMU was embarrassing. However, I'm pretty sure its safe to say that Virginia Tech played ten times better against Boise State than against James Madison. VT at their best is a great team. VT brought their best against Boise. You can see that because their players were playing with high energy that night; fighting for extra yards, running harder, playing faster, etc. You could feel the energy from both teams that night. That was obviously missing against JMU. I am not justifying that loss. Im saying that the Hokie team that played against Boise State is not the team that played against James Madison. 2. Oregon state lost to two top 10 teams they are supposed to lose to. That doesnt make them any worse. I will not make the argument that this was an impressive win, but it wasnt unimpressive either. Since my opponent kept his arguments short I'll do the same. I will have one contention/point. Boise State has beaten all of their top 25 opponents, top 10 opponents, and unranked opponents in the last 2 years. This includes three top 10 teams and 2 ranked teams (includes Nevada of this year due to the parameters of the resolution stated in Pro 1) Only one other team has done the same, Alabama. Therefore there is no justification for them not being at least number 2 and concequently in the championship. You can make arguments that other teams have better wins than Boise. In addition to that point being highly debatable, those other teams (except Alabama obviously) also have more and much worse losses than Boise does. Since the Broncos have not lost, while other teams that could possibly be ranked number two have, by simple logic they should play in the championship.