Evolution is the Superior Theory to Creationism

That seems pretty convenient to say to help fill in the holes of what you actually believe to support your side of the argument. So are you saying Evolution is no longer a thing because nature no longer requires it? Mother nature now says "there is enough species out there that we do not need to make a new subspecies or new species?" Again, You are using Adaptation vs Evolution between species to help support your argument. Anyone worth their grain of salt that is at least a little bit educated can clearly see that adaptation is certainly a thing. Humans and animals will always "evolve" to help them survive their environments. But that isn't to say just because we are changing to survive doesn't mean we are changing to become another species. As far as vestigial organs are concerned, yes, we do not know why we have those organs and evolution could be a theory why we don't need those organs any more but those organs do not tell us that we were at one point a different species at one point. You are just using faith to fill in that part of the missing data. I showed that pigs are actually (genetically) closer related to humans than apes are. We certainly do not look like pigs and other than that our DNA says we should. We are actually quite different for being so closely related. I do not know of any bipedal pigs (or pig-ish) looking species running around. Also for argument sake, let us say you did find an animal that is very similar between each other so you find several plot points between species how one animal has become another species entirely over time. Who is to say God didn't create those animals? Just because evolution exists or (adaptation) doesn't disprove the existence of god. Just as you cannot provide fossil evidence of a time line between 1% human to 100% Human... or the (trail of bread crumbs as you put it), I cannot provide definitive evidence of a God. And to satisfy the sub argument that I knew was going to be brought up I would just like to say about Genesis and the Bible. What God sees as "Days" might as well be translated to "periods of time"... a day to God might not be the famous 1000 years, or even 10000 years, it certainly isn't 24 hours as some people today feel it means. So if we go through Genesis with that in mind.... It makes perfect sense. So for the sake of definitions, Create does not mean "poof, it's there", when you make a cake there are ingredients. Put in the wrong things well, you don't really get a cake do you? 1) God created the heavens and the earth, the sky, a big ball hard rock. Light and Dark (It does not say the cosmos or universe) We are only talking about one planet here or maybe the sun too. So he likely created the Sun for "Light" and since the earth is round there would be naturally a light and dark depending on where the earth is facing the sun. The bible refers this to a day. but we actually do not know how long that day actually was in our "space time". Just because we understand 1 day to mean 24 hours doesn't mean that is how long that took God to create this part of the earth. it most certainly could have taken a million years, or even a billion to get to this point. 1 day just means "period of time", Which could take into account carbon dating. (I could go on about this subject for days, but for the sake of brevity, Let's move on, but in the comments section I will comment further about this if you would like to read more.) 2) The earth needed water. Which makes sense. If the end result is to have life on this planet, life cannot survive without water. 3) Then there needs be dry ground so now there is a place (or home) for not only land animals but marine life as well. 4) Now we are creating not only a visible sky, there is a solar system being created here. the Moon, Stars, Seasons, plant life. This makes the 5th day possible to support carbon based life forms. 5) This is the period of time where the animals were created. We couldn't have the animals the first day nor even the third day because no plant life for oxygen and even in water there needs be oxygen else marine life would still die. finally 6) People. So the bible supports your theory that it could have taken millions and billions of years for human life to appear on the earth as we do not know the exact time despite what the bible says to get from point A) to point B) as you say. 7th day he rested. So that being said, again, Me admitting that evolution exists does not mean I believe that we were once apes. It's me admitting that adaptation is a thing and will always be a thing. And back to the finch thing. I don't know the mind set of the finch and why it might not be found on another island, but that alone does not disprove my theory that God could have just created each type of finch to live on each island and maybe they are not migratory birds so they stick to the island that they know. Just because you do not find different finch or a mix of different finch does not mean God didn't make it that way. (I know, sounds like a creationist's cop out) But let us go back to why humans will likely never change. What you are saying? That natures design is to reach humanity and then never to evolve (aka change species) again because there is no need? That seems weird but also convenient. It is sort of a scientific cop out. Since we cannot actually support our argument that things are still "changing species" we will say it no longer is happening today. That isn't to say adaptation isn't a thing, because it certainly is. All in all you pointed out what I was trying to say. God created it that way, but one thing is a bit different. God could be behind your evolution. A lot of Evolutionists believe it has to be one or the other. They believe because one exists the other cannot. You see this is the debate and the argument. I have followed many a "bread crumbs" and I am just not reading the evidence the same way you are. I completely agree the existence of adaptation to ones environment. This is why we have hypothesis, theory, law.. There is a reason why it is called the theory of evolution and not the law of evolution like gravity. So that being said, Yes, I could say "god made that animal from the get go" but that isn't to say "God created X to potentially become X subspecies". That being said, I have yet to see fossil evidence showing the "bread crumbs" from point a to point b. If evolution happened there should be definitive evidence available and right now after scrubbing google to the bone, it's all "possibilities" but nothing that is definitive. Starting today and working your way backwards going step by step how the human race came to be. But not only is each step important but each step should be alive today. If we came from apes, why are there still apes? You cannot have both, if we came from apes and there are still apes that means all steps in between ape to human should still exist today. Or we came from apes and apes died off as to evolve into humans because the weak were weeded out to make room for the stronger human (which we know isn't the case). This is why I think of evolution as a religion just like any thing else. You take a piece of something run with it as you THINK it's proof that supports your belief system and someone else doesn't believe it and can explain why it is the way it is by different means. This is why there are so many different "theories" as to how the universe got started... Big Bang being one of the most popular. So why aren't pigs bipedal since they are closer related to humans than apes are?