Should europe take in non euorpean refugees

Wow, You managed to say Extreme nationalist and call my statement bigotry. You suprised me by not alling me a racist or nazi. Yes i do own my country, My ancestros came to sweden from Finland 800 years ago and started working on sweden through hard labour. Their reward is that their family all the way to me get to live and own our country. I am sorry that syrians don't have a very pleasant country, That their ancestors did not work on their country as much as my ancestors, But they should then start building on their country instead of coming to ours and acting like they have a right to it. The only people who have a right to the country is the poeple already living there, Syrians have a right to their country and europeans have a right to theirs. My Children owns this country, Their Children owns this country and my ancestors own this country. So yes, I own this country. How I wrote it does not matter how i wrote it, I try to help the most refugees. Let me explain economy to you, Lets say we have 100 coins and this could help 3 refugees in denmark or we could help mayby 12 refugees in israel. You could do both or take the Money from the refugees in the country so they can get a job ang give it to people who need fresh water. If we do both we can mayby help some refugees but if we help the people in the Close area only we could still help more. Scenario 1: 100 000- To refugee camps in the area close to conflict= helps 1 500 000 refugees 100 000-To refugees in europe= helps 150 000 refugees scenario 2 200 000-To refugee camps in the area close to conflict= helps 3 000 000 refugees 0-To refugees in europe= helps 0 refugees so they instead get a job. obviusly scenario 2 which is my scenario is the best. Lets summarise what you have accomplished here. First you decided to call me names and say I spread fear, Then in round 2 you misunderstood my Point on the bank robber, I did not mean every immigrant is robbing banks. In round 3 you said that I don't know that all studies will agree but later I wrote that it was because I checked myself and if you still don't Believe me check yourself, Is that so hard. You also questioned if I would fight for my country and my age does not matter, I know how to use a gun and controll an s122 tank. In round 4 you said that I did not own my country but I do, It is called a citizenship but the biggest problem of all is: This is a debate but you have not given a single argument to why we should keep europe open to those who commit crime and destroy our countries. I have said my arguments and you have just said that is wrong and that I spread fear which is wrong, There is not a single person who I know that fears me and I know you don't so stop saying that, I find it very rude and childish of a grown man. It is very cowardly to just face my arguments and say that they are wrong but I can't talk about your so you would seem like the one winnig. I am also going to say something that I know you are going to react on, The european ethnicity excists. In germany the germans are priority and in italy the italians are the priority, A country is not richer than its poorest citiens. In sweden the multicultural city of malmo is the 3rd largest city in sweden and the one with the most immigrants, Short said it is a failiure since everytime there is a shooting or bomb exploding everybody I know in sweden guesses on Malmo. The city looses 5 billion SEK a year and the rest of sweden have to give Money to the liberal-leftist politicians in malmo to make their Welfare work. I would like to finish saying this was my first debate I have ended and thanks for posting arguments faster than most people on this website, Good debate also.