If insurance is legally mandatory, then it should be covered by taxes.

Your honor, jury members of the industrialized countries and the people of the world, the pro side has proved that their motive for personally gains. The pro side motive does not benefit the people as whole but for few select groups (awful drivers, unemployed, and wealthy people). One reason the pro side does not want to pay insurance premium because the pro side is awful driver, itself. The pro side is trying to manipulative federal tax system and states/province/territory tax system in each industrialized countries due fact they are awful driver. For example, in the USA, this industrialized country has to be either Federal taxes and/or States taxes. The following states do not have income tax Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, Wyoming (source http://en.wikipedia.org...). The pro side wants to void the tenth amendment rights for people of these eight states in forcing these states to create income tax. (Source http://en.wikipedia.org...). The pro side also wants to void the other 48 states ten amendment by covering other states driver to cover the eight states that do not have income taxes. The Federal tax systems breaks downs for the USA such as Excises taxes 3%, Estate & Gift Taxes 1%, Other 6%, Individual income Taxes 41%, Payroll Taxes 40%, and Corporate income Taxes 9%. (Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org...). Therefore, if the pro sides gets the those eight states to have income tax then the federal government can take that money from the states and give them to all the awful drivers in that countries. The pro side has showed that the working class has to pay all the taxes for insurance premium so that the unemployed, poor and rich people can have insurance premium. I stated from the pro side "the bus company should pay a higher premium. commercial drivers where the transit is central to the business (taxi, courier, public transit, etc) are statistically more likely to play fast and loose with the rules of the road because their profit margin depends on speed and deadlines - they should pay more than Joe Blo who can come into work a bit late if speeding means he runs the risk of landing in the ditch. people with luxury and high-speed cars are going to rack up higher dollar claims in the event of an accident than a common import or a domestic vehicle so they should pay more." These are the working class of the industrialized countries. If the bus companies have to pay higher taxes due to paying for insurance premium then the worker wages will go down due to the bus companies having less profit. This will cause less money for corporate income taxes and this leads to another reason why the pro sides has a personally agenda for personally gains. The pro sides want to bankruptcy these industrialized countries for the wealthy people of the world. If these countries start covering insurance premium for everyone in industrialized countries then will dry up the tax funds because spending will be higher than revenue. This is why he USA is in financial cliff. Spending is higher than revenue. This will only benefit the wealthy people because the government will have to borrow against these rich people. Therefore, your honor, jury members of the industrialized countries and the people of the world, the pro side has proved that their motive for personally gains for theses select groups (awful drivers, unemployed, and wealthy people).