Minecraft is more realistic than normal life

I'm asking Con to not post anything in the last round, since Pro didn't make an argument based on the edited resolution in round two, and Con did. 1. "Life is unfair"My argument still stands that Minecraft also teaches you that life is unfair. Also, imabench fails to recognize that most Democrats are in fact rich, so even if they ran the country (which they don't, check the house of representatives), that would only strengthen my point more. What we actually have is a split government, where the only thing everyone has in common is that they are rich people supported by rich corporations and lobbyists. Also, just because the rich in the real world want to give minuscule handouts to keep people complacent doesn't mean that they lose all of their advantages, or that the poor replace their position at the top in a few days with a magic miracle item. In Mario Kart, the person in last place can catch up to the person in first in a few seconds. This is enormously unrealistic. Furthermore, there is no entity in Mario Kart which limits the amount of money made either. Mario Kart has no state at all, it simply has magic miracle items that allow the people in last to get to the top even without government interference. This is enormously unrealistic. 2." In Mario Kart you have friends and enemies"You cannot choose to have the world revolve around you in Minecraft at all! Considering that it is an infinite world which you can only see a finite amount of, the notion that the world revolves around you in minecraft is absurd! Also, in Mario Kart, there are no true "friends and enemies". It is just team battles. They are games. Nothing more. In Minecraft, your life is in danger from your enemies while your friends help you survive. In Mario Kart, everything is just a game. This is not realistic at all.3."No God in Mario Kart"imabench hypocritically tries to condemn me for stating a new condition in round two even though he changed the entire resolution in round two after accepting in round one. If imabench denies me the right to change something in round two, then this debate must end in a tie because he changed the entire resolution in round two, so we both violated the rules. If imabench accepts his behavior as perfectly fine, then he must also allow my minor edit. Also, when imabench changed the entire resolution he did not in any way complain about the survival mode edit, so we must assume that he was fine with it. With that in mind, the omnipotent factor is nullified because creative mode is not considered in the debate.4. Some people people are naturally sh*tty drivers. This also defeats imabenches first argument/rebuttal "life is unfair" because he concedes that their are no fines or penalties for hurting people in Mario Kart. Because of this, Mario Kart cannot be existing inside of a borderline nanny-state, or their would be regulation about street racing in pedestrian areas. However, since Mario Kart has been proved to be an Anarchist state, it would make sense to have no driving regulations, just like in Minecraft it would make sense to have no penalties for killing everyone. Also, the structure of government compared to real life is irrelevant, because when imabench changed the resolution, he changed it to "Minecraft is more realistic then Mario Kart", not 'Minecraft is closer to normal life than Mario Kart.' Therefore, Pro must prove that Minecraft makes more logical sense, and has better cause and effect relationship than Mario Kart, instead of proving that Minecraft is more similar to real life. As such, their is no reasoning behind Mario Kart having naturally shitty drivers, and having naturally sh*tty drivers does not support pro or con, and has nothing to do with the debate.5. Number of cars to choose fromMods are not unrealistic, since minecraft is an indie game which allows for such mods to take place. In other word Minecraft is built for mods, as said by the founder and owner of minecraft. (http://notch.tumblr.com...). Because Minecraft was designed with mods in mind, being able to download them does not violate any causal relationship, or plot lines, or anything else, and since this debate is not about similarity to real life (see above), mods are completely within the boundaries of being realistic. Coal and charcoal powering cars is not unrealistic. There is energy stored in those items just like there is in oil and gas. Trains have run on coal for a long time (https://en.wikipedia.org...), so I do not see how cars running on the same principle is unrealistic. While this debate still is not about similarity to real life, it still is about the game making sense, and since the game borrows that substance from real life, we must take what we know about that substance from real life.6. Abilities and powersFirst off, it being off topic only strengthens my point that Con had made a false-analogy fallacy in pointing out all of the different powers. Also, it is not many different kinds of people. It is a group of many different sentient species. Minecraft not having a variety of powers when there is only one unidentified species you can play as doesn't make any logical flaws or plot holes, so I don't see what the problem is.7. Obtaining vehiclesWhere is this proof of ownership? How do we know they haven't stolen it? Particularly the evil ones? How do we know the Karts weren't rented to them by their respective kingdoms? The answer is that we don't know because it is unexplained. It is a plot hole. As for the general carts, that doesn't address my argument at all. It simply states that they have an alternative to the cars that they magically have.As for the "building from scratch argument", the point I was trying to make it that you know how the car got there. It didn't magically appear. Even a cutscene would serve the same purpose. 8. Invisible walls What Con fails to mention is that the buckets are made of iron, which has a higher melting point than the average temperature of lava, much less a vaporizing point . (http://www.universetoday.com...), (https://www.google.com...) . Again, even though the debate is not about similarity to real life, it is about making sense, and since lava and iron are both substances found in the real world, we must take the data from those substances and apply them to minecraft.I'll concede the gaming abstraction point because there is no real way to argue it either way, and it doesn't support either Pro or Con.9. Relationships"People get hit off of the road and blown up all of the time"Again, friendly competition. No evil guys bringing outside items into the track. "Life does have a plot"If you can define that as a plot, then I could say Minecraft has a plot as well. You spawn, find some wood, make a crafting table, make a wooden pickaxe, find some stone, make a stone pickaxe, find coal/firewood, make a shelter, make a furnace, survive on food, mine, mine, mine, mine, find a cave, find some iron, make iron tools/armor, make a bow, mine deeper, find diamond, make diamond tools, mine some obsidian, build a nether portal, go to the nether, make more potions and enchantments, kill a sh*tload of endermen, use the ender eyes to find the End portal, go to the End, kill the EnderDragon. That's the ultimate goal, everything you decide to build and how you go about mining are just details.10. Texture Packs"He looks pretty human to me."Con fails to mention skins. There are enormous amounts of skins that can change how you look from a human to a humanoid figure with alien eyes. (http://www.minecraftskins.com...). Since you can change the eyes so much, why not change what they see? Again, not about simarity to real life, just about making sense.