Resolved: Capital punishment should be abolished

NOTE: During Lee's Rebuttal, I was accused of making up facts, its is obvious Lee did not check my links I posted. In these links I provided facts, and websites from which i got this info, i will now state why i believe I have won. COST EFFICEINCY As i stated before Cases where the death penalty was not involved cost $740,000, while cases where the death penalty is sought after cost $1.26 million. Keeping each of these "Death Row" prisoners costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population. The graph above shows the average spending on death row cases in blue, while in green it shows the average cost per case where the death penalty in not involved.NOTE: I am not making these facts up, and posted them in my rebuttal, but for the convience of the audeince and my opponent i will post them here, again with a few added ones involving my graph. http://ksabolition.org... http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org... http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org... Immorality of Legal Murder- Man does not have the right to condemmMy argument is the realization that you (as in whoever is reading this) have no right at all to condemm me to death, no matter what crimes I have committed. Also the fact that although death sentence punishments may not be "legally" cruel and unusual, they can be very painfull, and cruel. My example (for which i provided a link at the bottom of the page) was that of the execution of convicted murderer and rapist Clayton Lockett, the drugs used to kill him went awry, and he was fully awake, convulsing in agony and trying to speak, while being killed.Also made the undisputed point that no matter how good a justice system is it will have faults, and innocent people will be excecuted and wrongly accused.- Innocent people will be killedAlso i made the undisputed point that no matter how good a justice system is, it will have faults, and innocent people will be excecuted and wrongly accused. University professor Samuel Gross led a team of experts who concluded that at least 4% of people on death row were innocent. Also, according to the "Death Penalty Information Center" (a nationally respected team of experts) said that "there had been 152 exonerations of prisoners on death row in the United States since the year of 1973, and many of the were pardonned after death. - A second chance, inside jailFinally, im making the point that we must give these criminals a second chance at life, because we've all failed in one point or another. I do not mean, "Let them out of jail", but give them a chance at living, albiet inside jail.NOTE: My opponent was also making the weak point that we must kill these criminals because we can't let convicted criminals on the street again. I believe this is true, but in the example she used, it was "life in sentence" criminals, who had spent many years in prison, being realeased in 1 state, and has not been repeated since. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.washingtonpost.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... Since I have refuted all of my opponents points, and she has done little to refute mine, except lack of evidence, (which is false) I now believe I have won this argument based on these counts.1. My opponent did nothing to refute the evidence that it costs less to give life in jail, except lack of evidence (the links to the evidence you can find links to above, and on my previous rebuttal)2. My opponent did nothing to refute the evidence of the Moral limits of man condemming man.3. My opponent did nothing to refute the fact that innocents will be killed4. My opponent did nothing except attempt to refute my points based on falty facts, which i have proven wrong,and did not have any points of her own.