Homosexuality is Compatible with Christian Doctrine and God's Law

Original Sin and the Problem of Evil:Why do the piously-religious give credit to God for all the good and wonderful occurrences in their life and the world, yet blame ALL the bad things on Humanity and Sin?! In other words, butterflies, rainbows, flowers, happiness, love, peace, etc., are "blessings" from God --God is actively involved in human affairs, answering prayers, healing the sick, etc.; BUT pain, suffering, disease, famines, darkness and death are the result of sin. These are obvious inconsistencies! You cannot have it both ways!Do you REALLY believe crops fail because of sin rather than a drought or soil depletion? Do you REALLY believe HIV is caused because of sin rather than bush-meat being consumed from poached primates (who are so similar to us that by eating their flesh the HIV virus could be contracted)?! So maybe we are not all as informed or educated, but to suggest metaphysical or supernatural explanations for physical phenomena is a terrible starting point! It illustrates an obvious religious confirmation bias! These religious-supersticious ideas were believed before we understood why crops fail or before we developed a germ theory of disease..Sophisticated theologians and scholars recognize that it cannot be this way.If you find yourself giving credit to God for all of the pleasant things in your life, yet blame yourself and the history of Humanity (sin) for all the diseases, pain, suffering and unfortunate occurrences.. I would suggest to you that you in fact do have an unbalanced and skewed perspective because of your religion. And if this is true, I submit this as an example of how religious ideas are not healthy. Here is the problem of Evil within formal philosophy (in a nutshell): Original Sin (Evil) is theologically used to support and prop-up the idea of Free Will -- The idea is that God must allow evil to be pervasive in the world in order that we may be free.But it is a strident contradiction when we then say that God still answers prayers, heals physical diseases, interferes in human affairs, etc., He (God) then is participating in our dimension.. but then to say He is removed wholly from the evil in the world is absurd! A small example of God still being actively involved and causing human suffering in the Bible is when God allowed the first born in Eygpt to be killed so His chosen people could make their escape under the cover of darkness. What is moral about this God to allow this?!Again, also, Original Sin does not account for Natural Evils (natural weather disasters, earthquakes & volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, hurricanes, asteroids hitting the earth, solar radiation, etc., etc,), cases in which human choice can not explain death, pain and suffering.Nobody "chooses" a baby born with leukemia.Nobody "sinned" and caused the Indian Ocean tsunami that killed over 200,000 people. The tsunami was caused by an earthquake. The earthquake was caused by shifting tectonic plates. The tectonic plates shifted because of geo heat convection because the earth is still a geologically active terrestrial planet in our solar system.Nobody intentionally "chooses" to step on a poisonous snake or "sinned" to cause the snake to bite.So for religious-mined folks to suggest that their sins effectively caused their own suffering and pain is unspeakably arrogant and cruel! And the religious supporters of these kinds of superstitious ideas, whether ignorant or not, should be ashamed of themselves!Worse, you degrade and dishonor yourself by suggesting your own circumstances and state of being (being transsexual) was caused by yours' and the rest of humanity's past and future sins! It is so outlandish and wrong! Believing these ideas, cloaked under the garb of religiosity and faith is absolutely evil! It's like you are indirectly blaming yourself for your own suffering and radom circumstances that you didnt ask for. These ideas are no longer appropriate for modern times. They are sad because they were illconceived in the minds of ancient people.Romans 1:18-22, 24-29English Standard Version (ESV)God's Wrath on Unrighteousness18"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19"For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20"For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,[a] in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21"For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22"Claiming to be wise, they became fools24"Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25"because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.26"For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27"and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.28"And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. 29"They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice.How would an ancient transsexual be perceived?!?! My guess is as "gay" only because it is a very recent occurrence that we understand brain neurology.The ancient Greek translation of the term or word "homosexual" in the Bible is " arsenokoite" which can mean both a male prostitute or homosexual. But let's keep in mind there would be no way to distinguish between a homosexual and a male transsexual 2500 years ago.What was God's law back then concerning these matters? Let's visit Leviticus 20:13"If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads." It was capital punishment. A gay person would be smart to suppress who they are in order to live according to God's law..Why would God allow this back then but not now? Visa versa..? My question is purely rhetorical and I do not want an answer.