Chicken Dung=Alternative Energy

My opponent drops everything in his last speech. I don't know how she expects to win this :P Flow through my Topicalities. Flow through my Kritik ---And add on top of that an alternative (I guess I need one of those): ALTERNATIVE: Give all potential spending of the affirmative plan. AND have all funding issues specified and ready when asked for. I asked for them and she gave me nothing. But most of all, flow through my Counter-Plan (mostly because it would be awesome to win a debate where I call for a death increase!) Don't assume that death is a disadvantage, rather, look to the end result. The U.S. is in a bad condition, the ONLY people effected poorly by the counterplan are the people that die. However, the REMAINING U.S. get substantial advantages. Look to the U.S. during status quo, then look to them with passing of the counter-plan, it is a way better place. *Note to judges: If you don't accept one or two of my arguments, don't vote me down. In policy debate, all you have to do to win is to win one argument. ONE topicality (out of my 3), ONE kritik, ONE counterplan (plus there are other arguments that I haven't done). Since she drops them all, then you should accept them anyway but just wanted to point that out. Just for fun, I am going to continue running more off-case. OBSERVATION 4: CHICKEN HOLOCAUST COUNTER-PLAN *Note- Pass one or the other counter-plan. Thus there are 4 scenarios to vote for: 1) Affirmative case 2) Death counter-plan 3) Chicken holocaust counter-plan 4) Keep status quo A. Plan-text: The United States Federal Government will mandate 1) Gather 90% of male chickens and cut off their heads. 2) Feed as many people as possible with the chickens. 3) Establish a holiday called 'Awesome-Giving' for mandate 2. 4) Put all of the heads in several aircrafts and drop them on China. 5) Establish a holiday called 'Awesomer-Giving' for mandate 4. 6) Take the feathers and make thousands of pillows out of them. 7) Establish a holiday, from the thousands of pillows, called 'Awesomest-Giving' where everyone joins in on the biggest pillow fights ever. And laugh when you didn't 'give' anything. B. Non-Topical -This policy action has nothing to do with energy incentives. C. Mutually Exclusive -I keep the arsenic in the chicken. -Can't kill most of the chickens and still get affirmative solvency. D. Net-Beneficial 1) China -Given 2) Higher I.Q. -Chicken's are some of the dumbest animals on the planet. If we kill them, our average I.Q. will go through the roof. 3) More room -Chicken's take up way too much room. We are killing the uneccessary chickens. 4) Higher quality of living -With 3 more holiday's, people will be much more happy. An article thought up in my head said in 2009, that, "There are not enough holidays in the calander year." 5) Sleep Deprivation decrease -Another article thought up in my head said in 2009, that, "Sleep Deprivation is the biggest threat to humanity since the cold-war." 6) Pillow Fight -Come on! Who doesn't want to have a national pillow fight! OBSERVATION 5: ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE A. Uniqueness: Tax break put in directly from the plan-text. B. Link: Only dumb people would invest in poop. C. Link: Tax Break to dumb people. D. Link: The economy strives on dumb people paying maximum taxes. They don't know better. E: Harm: Giving this tax break will lead to less taxes being payed when dumb people realize that they shouldn't be paying this much. Thus, increase national debt, and a worsened economic crisis. F. Harm: Dead Babies... Can you have that on your conscience? In the end, all 7 of my off-case are voters and thus far, all 7 have yet to be argued. Thus, you must vote CON! Thanks. and LOL!