Abortion is unconstitutional under a reasonable reading of the US constitution

Every argument you have is based on the opinion that if a fetus is defined as an actual person, it would then be under the constitutions protection. I will prove once and for all that a fetus is not an actual person as said in the Constitution. 14th amendment (section 1) All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. A) "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;" To be considered a US citizen you must be born or naturalized in the United States. Since a fetus has not yet been born it is not considered a United States citizen, so it is not subject to the privileges or immunities stated in the Constitution. B) "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Person=a human being regarded as an individual. Individual= a single human being as distinct from a group, class, or family./ single; separate. A fetus is not separate and a fetus before the third trimester can NOT be separate from its mother and survive. Therefore a fetus does not qualify to be a person which would not grant it constitutional rights. Distinct= recognizably different in nature from something else of a similar type. In number 5 you said "Something dies in the womb; we can therefore assume something was "alive" prior to the abortion. You can call the fetus a "lump" or an "organism," but whatever it is, it dies." By your logic it is murder when you scratch your head or spray aerosol, because you are indeed killing cells, bacteria, and micro organisms that are living. Taking life is not always bad; Everyone takes life everyday in one way or another, but taking the life of a person IS a crime. As I have proved, an unborn fetus is not a person. I have now disproved your arguments 1, 3, 4, and 5, and on argument 2, condoms and birth control are not relevant to the topic as you first brought them up and I stated an opinion in round two. So that argument is out for both sides. In your second to last statement you said "My opponent has offered up ABSOLUTELY NO evidence that the interpretation of the constitution I offered in the second round was in any way invalid." I do not have to offer any evidence that your interpretation of the constitution is invalid. You are the one that has to prove that your interpretation of the constitution is correct because it is your interpretation and opinion. [OFF TOPIC] You also seem to be getting angry which is frowned upon. Please remember that this is just a civil debate on the Internet, in which there is no need to get angry over.