DDOlympic: Abortion should be illegal

FrameworkI'll use a simple framework of libertarianism. Every individual has the right to life, liberty, and property, and no person should be allowed to take away those rights from another unless he is being intentionally harmed.ArgumentEvery human being is an individual, and that includes unborn children. Abortion is an infringement on an individual's right to life, but an unborn fetus also causes harm to the mother. However, unless the woman was raped, she is responsible for creating that child which now harms her unintentionally by causing pain. She created her own problem; therefore, infringing on a person's right to life is not justified.Even if she was raped, she is not being intentionally harmed by her child, so killing it would not be justified. She's not going to die from pregnancy. It's not a big deal if you compare it to the child's situation of helplessness and the looming threat of death.In conclusion, abortion is a severe infringement on an individual's rights, so it should be illegal according to a libertarian framework, which my opponent also seems to be using.Rebuttals"A fetus needs to match ALL of these 7 following to be considered living. The fetus can only reasonably do 4, but if it is a late abortion, or if it unlikely excretes, it goes to 4 categories."The criteria for a living thing is meant to be applied to species, not humans at different stages of development. By your reasoning, any prepubescent child is considered non-living because of inability to reproduce, a paralytic is non-living because of inability to move, and an elderly person is non-living because of inability to grow. Since prepubescents, paralytics, and the elderly are clearly living beings, your argument is highly flawed and doesn't prove that fetuses are non-living. They are humans and humans are living; therefore, fetuses are living."As I explained in my 1st argument, the fetus is not living. Hence, as it says in my framework, that if the fetus is not alive, and the mother has liberty of her body, the fetus should be killed, it has no right, and it is harming the mother's body, who has liberty. The fetus doesn't have the right of life, so we should ban abortion by saying that abortion is murder, because it is not, according to my arguments and my sourced evidence, so as abortion is not murder, and harms the mother who has rights, abortion should not be illegal, or should be legal."This rests on the assumption that the fetus is non-living, which I have proven false."So there are no reasons why we should have an illegal abortion, because women do produce abortions anyways, and they are more dangerous, so we should just have abortion legalized."But abortion is legal, so why do illegal abortions happen anyway? Take a look at this spreadsheet:https://docs.google.com...It shows abortion rates and abortion laws for each country. It leaves out developing countries and shows that in the developed world, the number of abortions is greatly reduced by laws restricting or banning abortion. Illegal abortions are not as common as you suggest."This shows that teenagers have babies too. This totally wrecks the teenagers life. The 20s of your life is when you go to college, and earn lots of money, but these people need to care for the babies."Actually, they don't need to care for the babies. They can put them up for adoption so that they can get more capable parents.ConclusionFetuses are living humans, and thus have human rights. My opponent's arguments have been refuted.