It is scientifically probable that the Earth is "young"

First yes time and Age relativity apply to Earth if you remember what relativity means . 2. Considered in comparison with something else: the relative quiet of the suburbs. 3. Dependent on or interconnected with something else; not absolute. There are places were Time flows slower than on earth so the Time of earth is relative compared to this places in the universe. Just for clarification time can be slow by to reasons speed or mass (a black hole). Lets get back to my History between the astronaut and his classmate. For the classmate earth turned around the earth 50 times but for the astronaut Earth only did these revolution 5 times. You and me agreed that time and age are relative. So time is not absolute there isn"t a clock by witch the universe time guides itself. Time is not objective . The entire Universe does not share and live in the same time span as we. Did you now that inside a black hole time blocks it does not advance anymore it is locked for ever in is time if you were in a black hole well you"d be dead but for your remains time outside would be frozen for ever . How is time changed in a black hole? Well, in a certain sense it is not changed at all. If you were to enter a black hole, you would find you watch ticking along at the same rate as it always had (assuming both you and the watch survived the passage into the black hole). However, you would quickly fall toward the center where you would be killed by enormous tidal forces (e.g., the force of gravity at you feet, if you fell feet first, would be much larger than at you head, and you would be stretched apart). Although your watch as seen by you would not change its ticking rate, just as in special relativity (if you know anything about that), someone else would see a different ticking rate on your watch than the usual, and you would see their watch to be ticking at a different than normal rate. For example, if you were to station yourself just outside a black hole, while you would find your own watch ticking at the normal rate, you would see the watch of a friend at great distance from the hole to be ticking at a much faster rate than yours. That friend would see his own watch ticking at a normal rate, but see your watch to be ticking at a much slower rate. Thus if you stayed just outside the black hole for a while, then went back to join your friend, you would find that the friend had aged more than you had during your separation. (in clear text more you would enter the black hole more your time would go slower compared to you friend outside when you would reach the center time would stop compared to you friends Time would be advancing at a turbo rate) http://www.phys.vt.edu... Facts: Black holes exist. Black holes existed bevore the earth. Earth will not last for ever So to some one that lived in one of these black holes (no one lives inside black holes but just for explaning) That were around longer than earth ,for them earth has alredy be destroyed .Since our time is not the same as he"s than out time goes faster but the person living in the middle of the black hole would alredy seen the end of earth. Imagin to cars on a 20 kilometer high way one goes at 20/kilometers a second and the other goes 20 kilometers an hour .The one going 20 kilometers a second would reach the end of the highway in one second the other would reach the end of the highway in one hour. Imagin that the end of highway is the end of Earth and the speed of the cars is the speed of time to the person in the faster car earth would for him been destroyed way before Earth were gone for the driver on the slower car . The speed of time compared to each driver for the driver going the fasters the one in the black hole our time would go at Turbo speed .and for the driver on the slower car the time flow of the driver in the slow. You must not forget that we agreed that time is relative not objective(same every were) So in one of this black holes that existed before earth in their time speed Earth has alredy ended so earth is for some one that would be in a black hole(there are no people in black holes just for easier explanation you woud die ) dead over want meant That the Earth was "how long the earth will exist- and not is for them it would be was making the B.o.P for both of us impossible to held because earth for the people in the black hole would not be Is but was . And in the rule you stated : 3) The burden of proof is on Pro to demonstrate how the Earth is (scientifically) young. The burden of proof is on Con to counter Pro's contentions and show how the Earth (scientifically) is not young. But for the people in one of these black holes that existed bevore earth ,for them Earth is nothing at present time but was The verb is at the past. Making our burden of prof impossible to regard because for some one in these black hole Earth does not exist anymore . So earth is nothing really because to the people in the black hole earth would not be anything at present but for us here on earth now earth is lots of things. But nothing is something and was the same thing at the same time it"s a paradox . Example: He is alive and he was alive . Conclusion: it is impossible to say the earth is an age because earth does not exist for people in black holes so earth is nothing. Is like elephants are pink because an elephant is really pink but the rest are grey . If you say Earth is something it can"t have been the same thing .Well yeah you can say he is dressed in blue and yesterday he was dressed in blue also. But this does not apply to earth age because for this to be true Earth should stop existing and than come back what is nonsense. So the burden of prof is impossible to held on account. GOD luck to my opponent to escape the fact that it is a tie.