Embryonic Dust Cloud Theory

Rebuttals"planetary formation based on the collision of matter undermines some very basic, physical laws"Cue balls are not particles of cosmic dust. Cue balls do not have areas of sufficient charge to form electrostatic attractions with one another. Cue balls are at rest as opposed to the cosmic dust particles which collide as expected by Brownian motion. Larger objects can attract one another if they have a sufficient mutual gravity, if there is not enough they will repel as occurred with the Theia-terra collision. Your argument is like denying the existence gravity on the basis that garden peas don't orbit melons.Regardless of reason this dust clumping phenomenon has been observed on the spectra of disks afound round T Tauri Stars. [1]"The theory requires..."A planet's distance from its star is defined by two things, its mass and its escape velocity. Their orbit radius is the point where their escape velocity is at equilibrium with the force of gravity on their mass. An estimation may be made by applying Newton's law of inertia. (an estimation because planets are drifting away so are not at rest)If we follow your theory, per massa sola, the order would be Pluto, Mercury, Mars, Venus, Earth, Uranus, Neptune, Saturn, Jupiter.[2] In this since you have made the assumption that the force of gravity applied by the sun on every planet is constant which is not true, objects far from the centre of gravity like Pluto (5.9 billion km) have a weaker pull exerted upon them by the Sun's gravity. "Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum"The law states angular momentum is conserved; it can be transferred but not created or destroyed. Which would support your conclusion:"Henceforth, the planets formed within will spin clockwise as well, both in orbit and on their axis."On a basic level, yes. That is assuming that all the planets in the system owe their origin from the initial collapse; that they were have always been in the wings of the original eddy. This may not always be the case. An explanation is provided by locking at the orbits of asteroids. Retrograde orbits are a common phenomenon with asteroids. This is because asteroids (and planets) are not necessarily from material from the same protoplanetary disk as the object they orbit. Matter moves and it is very likely that planets like moons and asteroids were in drift then pulled into orbit at an angle resulting in a retrograde orbit.Another explanation is shock collision. Only two planets in our solar system are in retrograde orbit, Uranus and Venus. For Uranus, it has been proposed that a large telluric planet may have collided with it at a momentum capable of reversing the orientation of its orbit. Collisions also explain the different rotational axes found on the solar system's planets. Explained in layman's terms here: http://www.newscientist.com...EvidenceThe greatest evidence for the nebula origins of planetary systems is the present existence of its phases. Nebula, protoplanteary disks, protostars and complete systems can all be observed by gazing into the night sky, their respective compositions observable by electromagnetic wave imaging. The hypothesis simply is an application of the laws of physics and the natures of particles as we know them here on earth imposed on what we see. In recent years EM radiation spectra has allowed us to test elements of it in action. There is also no known alternative that explains the creation of planetary system as comprehensively as embryonic cloud theory. This is our best bet, Con is yet to provide us with something superior.Thank You, looking forward to round 2.[1] - http://iopscience.iop.org... -- c2d Spitzer IRS Spectra of Disks around T Tauri Stars. I. Silicate Emission and Grain Growth[2] - http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov... -- Planets and Pluto: Physical Characteristics