If Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny were in a brawl who would win I say the Bunny

"firstly you can find were I got this information ...Thirdly Santa and the Easter Bunny are both magic..." Let us check your links: 1. Definition of mutagenics; 2. My link from the prior round; 3. A blog about Spartans and Ninjas. Nothing relevant there. The last link contains NO INSTANCES OF THE WORD EGG. As for the magic clause, that's a no limits fallacy. I may as well say my Santa can magic H bombs and destroy the planet, and hence the Bunny. It's a ploy not related at all to the Easter Bunny in the slightest and it fails on that merit alone. Unlike Santa, who has a production facility with labour. Your link to wise geek is not related at all to your point. "But the Easter Bunny on the other hand originated in 16th Century Germany (the Germans are very "militant") so all this "grass loving hippie" stuff is irrelevant" Fallacy of composition. German folklore is largely indebted to Scandinavian folklore, having tribal migration from that region. Irrelevant however to the claim of a militant rabbit, since we have those very myths to look at, and their origin/basis, and it is distinctly not militant. It would be akin to saying all Germans are Nazis, because some were in the past; equally as fallacious as your premise. "Yes I understand this but you yourself said that they will likely brake in your hand..." What sort of damage is expected of eggs that simply break on impact? The concussive force, if the target mass can fracture the structure of the object, will unlikely therefore be great. Not to mention you ignore the issue of a rabbit paws. "it is Mutagenic you said that your self and like I said before he would have grasping digits that work well enough to throw something even if he had paws." Mutagenic relates more to its often increased size, not making it a non-bunny with human hands. http://cache4.asset-cache.net... "Firstly roofs are stationary so a moving rabbit would be next to impossible to hit. Secondly the only time Santa flies low is to stop on roofs on take off so his speeds would have to be decreased tremendously." A sleigh pulled by magic reindeer doesn't have to slow down, because stopping is not the present concern. Nor is an evasive giant rabbit an issue - the capable speeds of Santa rendering the reaction times of the Rabbit largely moot due to the approach speed (has to see it coming first), not to mention nifty aerial maneuvers. "This statement is agreeing with the statement from the first round saying that" Bunnies outnumber Elves 7 to 1." Ants outnumber humans about 1:10,000, yet who is the ruling species? The number is not relevant, the capabilities are and your rabbits are just that, rabbits. "as I said before Easter is, The Easter Bunny is not so that has no relevancy. Also rabbits are moving. " The Easter Bunny is not linked to Eostre and paganism? Even you own link agreed with my statements of it. Moving Easter Bunny is adressed above. "The Bunny and Santa are fighting in modern times that is the modern Christmas elf" Maybe if your resolution demanded it, however it doesn't - and it would also render your rabbit, by this premise, to the sole use of coloured chicken eggs and chocolate ones, making your IT'S A SPARTAN NINJA RABBIT, defunct. Even if granted, all that does is remove the capricious side of my elves, not the fact they have a factory able to produce anything it seems, at whim. "no it was created in 16th century Germany it is you who does not Know the Facts Sir." Lol. Did you even read what your little sentence addressed and what to? I was asking about your denial of the Easter Bunny's association with a pagan heritage (repeatedly, so where you get that I did not know, I have no clue). Finally using Google, does not make your prior incorrect statements, magically disappear. "this link of yours agrees with the fact that elves are tiny" Did I say otherwise? "and my posted picture is just like the ones you have on your link." I did not argue that current motifs of the elves are anything other than what they are, simply they ignore for the large part, relevant history of the what constitutes Christmas elves. The cartoonish motifs are modern yes, also distinctly not East European. The issue is less of time but of place. :) "It is also Known if you read up elves only make toys not play with them they are for the children not for them." By such reasoning, eggs, which are only to be given away, make your rabbit, again, having null by your own premises. To give toys away, they must first be produced. What is done between the receive and the creation is open. ""And another thing the elves would to be busy to fight..." They make the toys each year. The population of Earth increases, so too then must the requirements, which they accomplish with ease. :)