Should we change the electoral college from Population to number of actual voters

I'd like to challenge the idea that people are affected by Political actions. To the perspective of the average non-voter, the two main reasons why they do not vote are either because they are too busy or they just aren't interested. (. https://www.washingtonpost.com...) If they aren't interested then chances are that politics doesn't affect their daily lives. Voting is a right in the United States and when you say you do not want to vote that is your decision but that means you don't want to be counted in Politics either because you think Politics are boring or you're too busy to either get an absentee ballot or take the time to go to the nearest voting booth and do it. Another reason why a lot of Americans do not vote is because they believe their vote is way too minuscule to even count. (. http://www.livescience.com...) In the end though if we do make the electoral college based on voters then they will have a lot more of a reason to vote. Another thing I would like to point out is that, this is a bipartisan idea. States like Oregon,Maine and Minnesota can have their voices heard much louder. (. http://www.csmonitor.com...) The best reason why people in these states vote is because they know that it really does matter, these people all have a busy 9-5 pm schedule as well and they still come out to vote. Clearly they need their voices heard a lot more then these large states like California or Texas who clearly don't really care. These small states are taking time to addressing what is really a problem in their communities and looking to fix the issue besides sitting around and smoking dope all day or shooting pheasants. If you take the time to actually sit down and listen to debates and vote with a well informed opinion, shouldn't you be allowed to express it more then someone who really doesn't care. It's a lot like the idea of working, shouldn't someone who is working be looked at more favorably then someone who is on Facebook while at their job all day? (. http://www.forbes.com...) This is actually true and I would like to make my point by comparing apathetic non voters to people who don't really do their job. When it comes to efficiency in a company the one universal thing that drives employers crazy is the fact people are too bored so they sit around and surf on Facebook or look on Amazon for random stuff. In my field of work as an Electrician, I have taken many OSHA who have said that being distracted on Facebook on the Job can not only cause an explosion in a refinery but also can ban you from ever being in the Union again. Not only that but good luck ever getting a job in the electrical field ever again. My point is this, if we wish to be a more efficient nation that understands the problems of people who care then we should be addressing people's votes a lot more seriously. Let's stop saying they are too minuscule to ever count and actually show that their votes do count by changing the size of the electoral college every election based on voter turn out. Not only that but then the local governments of these states will begin trying to get their people to vote more. They may put out incentives and create a much better atmosphere. So now my question to my opponent is this, how do you convince someone who is not interested in voting that politics affects their everyday lives?