Evolution is not the best scientific model for the origin of species

Thanks for the “Opening Pleasantries.” Perhaps, one day we may have that “Grate Debate.” Pro will respectively decline any “amendments,” only to use the definitions, of this debate, defined by Con in Round 1. In Round 1, the definition of, “Evolution: the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.” Since Con did not define “earlier forms,” Pro will treat this phrase inclusively pertaining to other forms of life, the classical scope of evolutionist relative to “the history of the earth.” The debate title: “Evolution is not the best scientific model for the origin of species.”According to the definition of “Evolution” in Round 1, Pro will demonstrate the Constructal Law is a better “model.” That is, the Constructal Law is the best scientific model for the origin of species, which includes the evolution of both inanimate and animate systems, because, all life is based on inanimate elements and systems. http://www.amazon.com... On a side note, after reading Con's profile, and seeing that he is a man of faith, let's say Pro is both a scientist and also believes in God. Since God created everything, which includes the Laws of Nature; therefore, the Laws of Nature are the handwriting of God and the scientific method is a way to read God's handwriting. On the other hand, for those of faith, including preachers and prophets, should be careful when studying man's written scripture about God. We must remember man is fallible, and those who study or write such scriptures may misinterpret of what God wants; therefore, God gets--and, in some cases, God help us all.A scientist reading the handwriting of God will come to understand morality, the foundation of most faith based systems, is the fingerprint of God. Morality is an outgrowth of life's Unalienable Rights, which is an outgrowth of the Constructal Law, which is an outgrowth of the Laws of Thermodynamics. http://www.amazon.com...Shortly after the Big Bang the Laws of Thermodynamics started the evolution of the universe. The First Law of thermodynamics, which gives a relationship between changes in energy, volume, temperature, and pressure for expansion. Symbolically, the law can be stated as: dE + PdV = TdS, where the symbols of said equation are found in the following link: http://www.scienceandreason.net...The Second Law of thermodynamics, in part, governs the direction of flow. That is, flow moves from high to low temperatures, flow moves from high to low pressures, later in time, the flow from high to low resistance for electrons; throughout nature, symmetries are found in: the flow from high to low elevation for water, the flow of life taking a path from high to low resistance in the pursuit for food, etc.The Constructal Law states: Given freedom, for a finite-sized flow system to persist in time (to live), its configuration must evolve in such a way that provides easier access to the currents that flow through it.The Constructal Law governs evolution in physics, biology, technology, and social organizations. This Law explains how everything that moves--whether animate or inanimate--naturally evolve in ways that facilitate such movement in the study of flow dynamics. Flow analysis is rich in “scientific models” in many fields when studying the motion and currents of flow relative to resistance. Flow at the biological level, is a manifestation of life's primitive working function or bio-program which maintains, once alive, “Life” must have the freedom (“Liberty”) of flow or movement, in “the pursuit (energy to overcome resistance) of” survival; otherwise, there is no life. Since we have life, survival is a form of positive-feedback the mechanism of adaptation, procreation, “Happiness” for us humans, etc. Hence, Thomas Jefferson's celebrated polished version of this bio-program, which he labeled Unalienable Rights of “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” Life's Unalienable Rights is a dynamic interface with nature or a bio-program, where all “Life” has a craving to sustain, improve and prolong itself, with the desire to increase freedom (“Liberty”), while decreasing the energy (taking the path of least resistance) in “the pursuit of” an objective, and in the process, exploring new levels of positive-feedback (“Happiness” for us humans). This bio-program is the foundation for the “Natural Selection” process; the machinery of evolution for life, social systems, technology, free-markets, etc. On a side note, 80 some years after Jefferson, Darwin came on the stage and fell in love with Herbert Spencer's “survival of the fittest” paradigm. Relative to Spencer's paradigm, life's bio-program represents, more accurately, a model for “life having the freedom in the pursuit of positive-feedback.” Too bad Darwin did not expand on Jefferson's work, which may have morphed into the paradigm of “survival of the happiest.” Perhaps, the first part of the last century would have been a happier time, if the mentality of the political powerbrokers embracing Social Darwinism viewed social evolution as “survival of the happiest,” instead of “survival of the fittest.” On that note of “survival of the happiest,” the Absolute Values of morality is Right (moral, positive-feedback, “Happiness”) or Wrong (immoral, negative-feedback, unhappiness). The objective of morality is doing Right keeping a group alive. That is, when two or more humans form a group, the group becomes alive. The life of the group is sustained through goodwill and kindness leads to a mutual moral respect for embracing the Unalienable Rights (“Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”) of the members within the group. Goodwill is a Conservative force that promotes order, stability, and harmony through the pursuit of group-wide positive-feedback. Over time, group-wide positive-feedback is the genesis of traditions, social values, beliefs, language, etc., the norms of society. These norms are tried and tested, and conservatively pass down from one generation to the next establishing its culture. A moral order guides an individual in the prudent exercise of judgment relative to those norms, going with the social flow minimizing civil resistance. The individual in a civil society strives, albeit imperfectly, to be virtuous; that is, restrained, ethical, and honorable, respecting and embracing the Unalienable Rights of others relative to those tested norms.The objective of morality is to keep a group alive, is the evolution of traditions, social values, beliefs (aka faith based systems), language, etc., the norms of society. The empirical evidence of the diversity of language, beliefs, and social norms throughout history and today demonstrates the universal absolute moral thread that runs through the tapestry of humanity in the evolution of civil societies. Of course morality is a man-made word simply referring to the values of Right or Wrong. These values generate mutual positive- or negative-feedback, relative to the Unalienable Rights of another. Mutual positive-feedback, in group creation, is found throughout the spectrum of life in the beneficial formation in schools of fish, flocks of birds, packs of wolves, tribes of humans, and in addition, inter-species relationships, such as those between humans and their pets.Also, life's Unalienable Rights became the foundation to the US Constitutional design of governance, which sparked a social experiment within a short period of 200-years, changed the world like no other society in recorded history, through the evolutionary fruits of technology, food production, and medicine, the stables of human existence throughout the world today. A compelling example of what happens when our Unalienable Rights are free to flow, having minimal resistance, within the awesome machinery of nature. As Con stated, “-Scientific Model: a physical, conceptual, or mathematical representation of a real phenomenon that may be used to explain and predict the behavior of real objects or systems and are used in a variety of scientific disciplines, ranging from physics and chemistry to ecology and the Earth sciences.”The Constructal Law is a new “Scientific Model,” having physical, conceptual, and mathematical representation of real phenomenon to explain and predict the behavior of flow relative to resistance in real objects and systems used in a variety of scientific disciplines ranging from physics, biology, technology and social organizations. Again, for those of faith, the evolution of morality, the fingerprint of God, is an outgrowth from life's Unalienable Rights, which is an outgrowth of the Constructal Law, which is an outgrowth of the Laws of Thermodynamics; part of the Laws of Nature, the handwriting of God.In closing, Pro's “BoP” presented a scientific model (the Constructal Law) that encompasses the known observable data and has been able to predict scientific discoveries rivaling both Darwinian (“survival of the fittest”), and traditional evolution view of living systems “developed and diversified from earlier forms” of life. The Constructal Law includes the development of morality, etc, including animate and inanimate which transcends the classical definition in Round 1. Therefore, this debate's definition of “Evolution is not the best scientific model for the origin of species,” it is the Constructal Law, the handwriting of God.