Having a resolution with two unrelated topics is bad, and the show "Lost" has a bad plot.

Having two resolutions in one debate can be very confusing, much in the way that the plot of Lost is confusing and random. To have a debate about 2 different things, is to not have enough focus on either of the topics, since the focus is divided in two -much in the way that the writing of the script for the show Lost, is divided between writers who are not in synchronization of what it is about. It will go back and forth between the two topics (in much the way that lost goes back and forth between crazy and irrelevent flashbacks, and the crazy and irrelevent story), and will be hard to follow. Speaking of hard to follow, "Lost" has a random plot which is confusing merely for the sake of being confusing. It is meant to make the viewer wonder what the answer to the mystery is, but it is obvious that there is no real answer to it. It gets more and more ridicilous (as ridicilous as debating 2 resolutions at once) and harder to follow. Debating two resolutions will confuse the voters, and they will not know what to vote on. For instance, what if one person wins on one resolution, and the other on the other resolution? Well that's as confusing as Lost. The show Lost starts off (beginning of an episode or the beginning of a season) by giving one a Strong sense of curiosity which needs to be satisfied. They throw out crazy twists, and the viewer watches the show constantly to figure out how they are all connected. Though at the end of the show or the end of the season, nothing is figured out, and nothing is connected. Pn the same token, in a debate with two resolutions, at the end it is evident to the voter that the two topics re truly random and unconnected in every way. It leaves the viewer/voter with an empty feeling inside. They get so wrapped up in the plot/debate, only to learn that not even the writer/instigater of the script/debate knows any more than they do, what the hell it is about. Having a debate with two resolutions is essentially having 2 debates, but in the same field. For the sake of organization and fitting in with the given system, it makes sense to simply have them as two seperate debates. The show Lost has absolutely no substance to the plot. It is just a bunch of questions. What could this be? Why is this? They never have answers, in the same way you can't have one answer for two topics. It is also very un-plausible in almost every way. The very foundation of the story is flawed, for one, because the chances that anyone would have survived such a plane crash (or the chances of a reader surviving such a badly-structured debate) is next to nil. Likewise, the very foundation of a debate with two different threads of thought is flawed. There are many other ridicilous twists with no explanation or plausibility, such as a polar bear on a jungle island. Also, I would like to call atention to the monster thing which was a large part of the plot for some time. Isn't it a little stupid to have a monster chasing someone in broad daylight, but not ever pointing the camera at the monster? That is pretty crappy cameratography. On that same note, having two resolutions makes for a pretty crappy debate. It is very un-productive to watch Lost, and/or to try to concentrate on two different subjects. Lost is pretty stupid, and so is conjoining two completely unrelated ideas into one sentance using the conjunction "and". http://www.youtube.com... -Harlan