Gay Marriage

~refutations~"I believe that there is no good reason for gay marriage to be illegal."I will provide reasons later."The only reason it IS illegal in some states is religious reasons, and separation of church and state and freedom of religion are in the Constitution."That's not the reason. I will provide other reasons later. "Another common argument is health risks- well, turns out there aren't many. Anyone who has anal sex, homo or hetero, have the same risks to AIDS and other STDS."That's not a good reason I agree. But it is a fact that homosexuals are more likely to get STD's through intercourse. 75% of AIDS cases occur in homosexual couples. [1] That means the aids rates among homosexuals are 50 times higher. [2] The rates of homosexuals with AIDS is increasing. [3] Gays have me partners then heterosexual couples, hence raising their aids risk. [4]This isn't a reason to ban it, but I had to disprove your last snid bit."Well, gay parents tend to be more motivated, more committed than heterosexual parents on average, because they chose to be parents. "Heterosexual marriages last longer and are actually more stable. [5] It makes better fathers as they are actually HIS children, and the mothers are better too for the same reason. [5] Kids tend to do better with mothers and fathers. [5] These marriages tend to create long lasting and good marriages that homosexual marriage seldom does. [5] ~Against Same Sex Marriage~Marriage in the governments eyes is an institution about procreation and child rearing. [6] The goverment gives any economic benefits to these couples and with that it is safe to assume they are interested in something. The interest is to further propagate society through responsible procreation. [6, 5] Without these heterosexual couples society would not exist, and therefore we would have no human race. This is a reason these relationships in the states eyes are indispensable and deserve the special recognition. Relationships like homosexual ones do not deserve this privilege as they can not contribute to society the way heterosexual couples can, and hence do not deserve the privilege of marriage. The goverment wants two couples of heterosexual sexual preferences to create biological children to propagate society in the correct way. [8] This, as stated, will fulfill states interests. A homosexuals anatomy cannot do this, they cannot create children when in intercourse with their preferred couple. As they cannot do this, they should not be allowed to marry. Conclusion:The states interests are in fact heterosexuals in procreative type unions attempting to further society. The state confers many economic benefits to these couples, this hints to they have interests in the marital business. These benefits are costly to the governments coffers, so the reason they have incentives is procreation. [6] These procreative couples fulfill states interest therefore deserve recognition. Homosexual couples can never ever create these procreative type unions therefore do not deserve the legal status of marriage. Marriage is defined for this reason, vote con.[1] http://www.cdc.gov...[2] http://www.lifesitenews.com...[3] "Increases in Unsafe Sex and Rectal Gonorrhea among Men Who Have Sex with Men--San Francisco, California, 1994-1997," Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report[4] A. P. Bell and M. S. Weinberg, Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women [5] "PROTECTING AMERICA’S IMMUNE SYSTEM: A REASONABLE ARGUMENT AGAINST HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE" by Frank Turek[6] William C. Duncan, "The State Interests in Marriage" Ave Maria Law Review (2004)[7] "Same Sex marriage: Should it be legalized?" By Alexander Adams, Sandia Preparatory school[8] "Straight is better: Why Law and society May Justly Prefer Heterosexuality" By George W. Dent, Jr.