Creationism should be banned from science classes

Apologies on my end for my mistake. What I meant, Was 1 in 4x10^300. This statistic comes from a study done in 1970 by Sir Frederick Hoyle, An evolutionist. He researched the odds of the spontaneous generation of the simplest known free-living life form on earth - a bacterium. He determined that the probability of such an event is one chance in ten to the 40 thousandth power. Hoyle stated: "the likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40 thousand zeros after it. It is enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution, He said. Mathematicians tell us if an event has a probability which is less likely than one chance in 10 to just the 50th power, Then that event is mathematically impossible. If you read his next response I would bet that he will dream up a reason to "put aside" my "mathematic reasoning", Yet still complain that there is no proof. Apologies as well for saying that the earth was created, A comment that destroyed the rest of my argument (I guess). Yes, The universe was created, The fact that anyone could believe that the universe created itself by accident is ridiculous. For all of human history, Almost every civilization we have record of, Has accepted and followed some form of theism. Until, That is, The age of reason, Where the idea that humans were like gods. Which is why we are faced with this THEORY of evolution. You say that evolution is a combination of billions of sure things happening, But answer this, Lets say that this gene has a 100% chance of duplicating and advancing. Where did it come from? Did you leave that part out, Or did you not think that it was relevant? See, The problem is, That you assert that just because my answer to this question is simple, It could not possibly correct. In contrast, You must attack my credibility, To distract the readers from the clear flaws in this THEORY of evolution. The flaws that keep this THEORY from being anywhere near a fact. Have you ever read or studied the works of any of these scientists, Or did you just discredit them immediately because a bunch of government-backed scientists said so? This is another huge issue, You would have our audience believe that because the government funds scientific research, They are right. What? Quote fro my opponent "we do have rock solid evidence. Otherwise why would governments fund national museums teaching evolution. Just ask any scientific institution like a reputable university whether they think evolution is a fact. " Wow. Are we still talking about the U. S Government, The same Government that got itself into $20 Trillion in debt? The same one that spent 146 million to upgrade federal employee's flights to business class. Who paid 120 million in retirement and disability to dead federal employees. So if the government spends money on it it has to be true right? Wrong. Yea, Great, Ask government funded schools on the record if they think evolution is correct. The government has an agenda, And those who disagree, Or fight it are discredited and silenced. Not because they have been proven wrong but because they are outnumbered, And people don't want to hear anything that will upset them or change the way they want to think. I also never said that Mary Schweitzer was a young-earth scientist, But I did imply that dinosaurs co-existed with humans. Her accidental discovery proved that we did. If you believe that God created the earth, You also believe that he put everything in place to natural events such as a river erosion. Also the word theory is not used to describe a fact, The word fact is used to describe a fact. A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, Especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. There is the definition of a theory. Lets talk about some fossils. Homo erectus, Which is referred to as the most primitive human species. As the name implies, Homo erectus means "man who walks upright. " Here is the problem, There is no difference between the postcranial skeleton of modern man and Homo erectus. The primary reason for evolutionists' defining Homo erectus as "primitive" is the cranial capacity of its skull, Which is smaller than the average modern man, And its thick eyebrow projections. However, There are many people living today in the world who have the same cranial capacity as Homo erecus, And other races have protruding eyebrows. It is a commonly agreed-upon fact that differences in cranial capacity do not necessarily denote differences in intelligence or abilities. Intelligence depends on the internal organization of the brain, Rather than on its volume. Australopithecus cannot be counted an ancestor of man has been accepted by evolutionists. The famous French popular scientific magazine Science et Vie made the subject the cover of its May 1999 issue. Under the headline "Adieu Lucy"-Lucy being the most important fossil example of the species Australopithecus afarensis-the magazine reported that apes of the species Australopithecus would have to be removed from the human family tree. Here is the misconception about probably the most important of them all. The term Homo rudolfensis is the name given to a few fossil fragments unearthed in 1972. The species supposedly represented by this fossil was designated Homo rudolfensis because these fossil fragments were found in the vicinity of Lake Rudolf in Kenya. Most paleoanthropologists accept that these fossils do not belong to a distinct species, But that the creature called Homo rudolfensis is in fact indistinguishable from Homo habilis. Richard Leakey, Who unearthed the fossils, Presented the skull designated KNM-ER 1470, Which he said was 2. 8 million years old, As the greatest discovery in the history of anthropology. According to Leakey, This creature, Which had a small cranial capacity like that of Australopithecus together with a face similar to that of present-day humans, Was the missing link between Australopithecus and humans. Yet, After a short while, It was realized that the human-like face of the KNM-ER 1470 skull, Which frequently appeared on the covers of scientific journals and popular science magazines, Was the result of the incorrect assembly of the skull fragments, Which may have been deliberate. Professor Tim Bromage, Who conducts studies on human facial anatomy, Brought this to light by the help of computer simulations in 1992. There is no family tree of man. https://www. Darwinismrefuted. Com/origin_of_man_04. Html The earth is no more than 8, 000 years old, I can't definitively prove that, The same as you can't prove that it's billions of years old. However, The findings of Mary Schweitzer prove at the very least that there is a huge flaw in at least one of their most reliable dating methods. The preferred method of dating dinosaur fossils is with the radiometric dating method. And the result of this accepted method dates dinosaur fossils to around 68 million years old. However: Consider the C-14 decay rate. Its half-life (t1/2) is only 5, 730 years"that is, Every 5, 730 years, Half of it decays away. The theoretical limit for C-14 dating is 100, 000 years using AMS, But for practical purposes it is 45, 000 to 55, 000 years. If dinosaur bones are 65 million years old, There should not be one atom of C-14 left in them. Yet there certainly was. https://physics. Stackexchange. Com/questions/154588/is-it-a-problem-with-radiometric-dating-that-carbon-14-is-found-in-materials-dat Dear audience, Evolution is absolutely false. I know you don't read the bible but not all who call themselves christians, Accurately represent God's word. The Pope is proof that Catholicism is completely false, Because, Though he claims to be infallible, Contradicts many of the bible's core principles. If you take anything away from reading this, The most important thing is this. Evolutionists, Are absurd to say that creationism is silly and is confusing and harmful to children, When they shove this THEORY down their throats and pretend that it's a fact. Again, It's maddening to read you complain about brainwashing children when that's exactly whats been happening since the government started regulating this garbage in schools