God is not real

We created time to make it easier to explain when things will occur and date what has already,is, or will happen. We created God to make it easier to explain phenomenons science can't explain like "miracles" (for when they can explain them, what happens to God) and what happens after death. Daniel 4:11 could be figurative speech, but I doubt it. The reason I doubt it is because Christians actually believe Jesus changes the bread into the body and the wine into blood. It's called transubstantiation. Here's the definition: Transubstantiation (in Latin, transsubstantiatio, in Greek _6;^9;`4;_9;`5;`3;^3;`9;`3;_3;`2; metousiosis) is the change whereby, according to the teaching of the Catholic Church, the bread and the wine used in the sacrament of the Eucharist become, not merely as by a sign or a figure, but also in actual reality the body and blood of Christ. You see? "...not merely as by a sign or a figure, but also in reality the body and blood of Christ" That's illogical! If I were to take crackers, say a few Latin phrases over them, then Jesus's ACTUAL blood and ACTUAL body are suppose to appear? And we're suppose to eat it!?!? Looks like the bible encourages cannibalism too! That also proves my point that Daniel 4:11 is not figurative like you insisted, but they mean it literally just like with the bread and wine. Proving the bible says the Earth is flat. I like how you went from saying God doesn't creat evil as evil is the absent of good, to agreeing with me, but by now saying he "accidently" did it. He seemed pretty proud of himself and wasn't afraid to say it in Isaiah 45:7. For your thoughts on God creating the Big Bang: For many "God caused the big bang" is a perfectly reasonable response. This seems to help many cope with the unsatisfying prospect of an event without a cause. The problem of course is that one is then immediately forced to ask, "From where did the creator come?" If the answer is "he always existed" then we have a situation, from a causality standpoint, that is no more satisfying than a universe that springs forth from nothing. A creator that has always existed is an entity that somehow exists without a cause. So this answer doesn't solve the causality issue whatsoever. http://www.deepastronomy.com... Also, here insist it wasn't an actual "bang" The Big Bang is not an explosion of matter moving outward to fill an empty universe. Instead, space itself expandswith time everywhere and increases the physical distance between two comoving points. In other words, the Big Bang is not an explosion in space, but rather an expansion of space.[4] http://en.m.wikipedia.org... Okay, so there is scriptures in the bible that "prove" there is a heaven. Big deal. A book about HEAVEN should have scriptures about HEAVEN. This doesn't surprise me or interest me the slightest, as neither you nor I have been to heaven, and those people could not understand the complexity of heaven as they couldn't understand something as simple as a women's period. SPEAKING of that you ignored a few of my questions and points. 1.why is it God didn't understand a women's period, as he called it an abomination and told them to wash as if they were diseased? Is it because the people back then didn't understand it? I believe so... 2. Why does the bible have instances where God encouraged rape and slavery? Doesn't seem so omnibenevolent after all... But I already proved that in my first round! 3. What is one knowledgable thing in the bible that couldn't be solved by a common man back then, let alone today? No answer? Didn't think so. 4.You often talk about free will, but it never says that in the bible. It only talks about predetermination. Therefore people going against their will to choose not to follow God is false If we look at the bible as we have no free will! You failed to address these points even though I asked you to. One point you address is the Hosea 13:16 verse with the children. You are saying if the children are innocent,then life doesn't matter and they will have eternity in heaven. Get this through your head: YOU JUST SUPPORTED MURDER! and if I had to spend an eternity with the person who demanded I'd be killed, I would rather choose not to. By the way, thanks for the advice, but I think I did a fine job using it, and I'll continue to use it in other debates as it proves my points as much or more than yours. :)