It is Logically Impossible for God to Have Perfect Foreknowledge

Rebuttals Scripture It has some relevance, this debate is about any God with (that have the listed abilities), not a specific god from my understanding. So we have to take into consideration Gods that have the ability where nothing is impossible with them. There are no impossibilities with the Christian God. He’s omnipotent. Self-Restriction Him being both omnipotent and not omnipotent at the same time would be a paradox. So it’s theoretically possible to be pulled off through a paradox through his omnipotent power. God & Logical Contradictions Con: "Omnipotence can create a contradiction." No, that’s not what the resolution says. The resolution states “It is Logically Impossible for God to Have Perfect Foreknowledge” it does not say “It’s a Logical Contradiction for God to Have Perfect Foreknowledge”. The most simplest answer to how god can logically have perfect foreknowledge is simply by contradictions or paradox by his omnipotent power. You’re saying it’s irrelevant, but I’m starting to wonder if you understand your own case. You’ve been basically arguing [contradiction = impossibility]. In fact your pretty much outright stated it when you said “If something logically contradicts, it is therefore logically impossible. “ Your entire case hinges on contradictions not being possible. But clearly omnipotence does have the ability to contradict, as it reads “Is unrestricted in power.” There is therefore no restrictions that state omnipotence can’t contradict or make paradoxes, the real kind. Con: "If contradictions can be created, therefore contradictions are logically possible" No, Logic is the use and study of valid reasoning. The word logic itself literally means “reason” from which we get the Greek word if you look up the etymology. Logic itself doesn’t specifically reference to any rule directly, there are popular principles that are used by most logicians, one of which is the non-contradiction that Pro did bring up. The rule of non-contradictions is an axiom in most contexts, but the question here needs to be asked does this rule apply to this context? The answer would be no because we are debating in the context assuming omnipotence to be true. If omnipotence is true, the rule of non-contradiction is refuted because there does exist a power which can contradict itself. One might ask why can’t the law of non-contradiction logically refute omnipotence? It’s mainly because non-contradiction is founded on circular reasoning, essentially “Contradictions can’t happen because contradictions can’t happen” so you would have to use a well-known fallacy to attempt to refute omnipotence, which doesn’t work out very well. So the rule of non-contradiction can’t be considered logic in this context because omnipotence refutes it reasoning (logic) that it can create a contradiction. "Possible" does not equal "logically possible" → You appearently don't know much about logic, if it's really possible it is the very reason why it's logically possible. Foreknowledge vs. Free Will No, he simply foreknows what his “free will” will pick ahead of time. If the god doesn’t change nor deviate from the choices he picked in the future, then it remains perfect foreknowledge. So it is possible for a god to have both free will and perfect foreknowledge if he chooses out of free will not to change his future (which I’ve been essentially arguing). A god may not desire to change because all his decisions he made in the future were the best. Miscellaneous Answers "...free will isn't even listed as a requirement for god..." No omnipotence requires free will to be operational. Theoretically a robotic god with no free will canbe omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, etc.