Reading is more fun than watching a movie

As what you stated, I really lack in the subject. Fact that I have shown you six reasons why it is better, I simply do not understand why It seems to you that I did not prove my side yet. Reading your argument, do you actually think that you made a better argument? I believe that you haven't proven your side also. You only talked about: Movies are less time, and that people watch it. I understand, less time, sales, graphics. But have you seen what I was talking about? More time, more fun (Which you disagree, understandable, It looks like we seek different kinds of entertainment). This is where movies fall short, even with the advent of advanced CGI (Computer Generated Imagery). The problem is that everything is pretty much given to you on the a silver plate. You don"t have to imagine what the characters look or sound like or what the surroundings look like. This can also can limit the scope of a movie, especially if the budget is somewhat limited. CGI can be incredibly expensive and so can on-location shooting so unless an ambitious movie has solid financial backing, it will not be made or, if it is made, it may be clearly a "budget flick". Very good movies try and leave certain scenes to the imagination and the effect is always that much more powerful. I only cut proved my past statements, I'm fully aware of the redundancy, and I apologize for that. "Some people could not visualize". A moment of silence for them. They missed the great part. So that very much applies to reading a book. After all, you only have a sheet of paper with some ink on it, yet it enables one to be transported to different times, different countries and even completely different scenarios. This explains why books are "that" great for me. Why is it good to stimulate one"s imagination? Well, the human imagination is just like a muscle, so it"s a case of "use it or lose it". Nobody has the choice to completely stop using their imagination, but they can become so reliant on crutches that they cannot walk on their own two feet. Many people have this experience when they go back to reading books again. At first they cannot seem to create a vivid picture and follow the story line but with enough perseverance they find that their imagination can create a far more realistic and enjoyable experience than any movie. From here, let me continue my argument. Movies are often made for an audience that are impatient at best and highly critical at worst. With this in mind and combined with the fact they cost a great deal of money to produce and need to recoup their investment as quickly as possible after being released due to the heavy investment, movies tend to be much faster in pace than books in order to satisfy their demanding viewers. I'm also a fan of wonderful movies like The Hunger games, but I simply like reading more. A book can be created by just one person. A movie usually demands at least another, because at its core, movies are collaborative art forms and can use the talents of others while books draw on the singular style and voice of one author. It is for this reason that movies can fail due to the involvement of other people. Their collective failures can sink the efforts of well-meaning actors and directors. And since all the elements in a film are important, failure of the various departments in a movie project can affect the end result. Most movie audiences don't care an ounce about these difficulties - nor should they. However it does make the average movie less likely to succeed due to production difficulties. "Hey this is not included in the subject you must tell why read is of greater fun" I expect this from you, but I had to state that part. By their very nature, movies require an electronic device with a screen just to view them. This immediately adds complexities related to formats, power sources, durability and price. Books make your life simple. Modern life is already complex and we have hundreds of things to do and remember. Paperback books offer several advantages over many electronics. You can throw them in your back, drop them, leave them unattended while you go to the bathroom without worrying that someone will steal it. So I guess it comes down to the fact that watching is a passive pastime while reading is an active pastime.