BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
@Masterful sucks

AlphaDork, I accept your challenge. If you've come for a jolly good bumming then you've come to the wrong place. I'm a married man and i'm only interested in my fat pig of a wife. Her pvssy might be loose and saggy, but her butt hole is tight like a new born babies. That's literally the only reason we're still together. I await your argument as to why "Masterful sucks."
Animal Cloning

Cloning isn't insane. It's science. With cloning scientists don't expect different outcomes everytime. they expect the same thing. Cloning can create so many new doors if we perfect it.Cloning has many more advantages than disadvantages. It can help us medically, emotionlly, economically,etc. Cloning a great scientific discovery.I REST MY CASE.(mantaka.org, healthresearchfunding.org, animal-loning.net, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, grossmont.edu,m.wisegeek.com)
Animal Cloning

The definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, animal cloning is by definition: insane. For my final point I would just like to say once again that no human being should be able to play the role of god, no human being should be able to decide who or what lives or dies. The deaths of hundreds upon thousands of animals does not justify the lives of a few animals we can use. Imagine if or when one day we feel like we’ve perfected animal cloning and we decide it’s ready for humans. When complications arise will you as a person be able to sleep at night knowing that you supported and voted to kill hundreds upon thousands of children, abort hundreds upon thousands of babies, and shred the lives of hundreds upon thousands of innocent mothers and fathers for the one rich family or rich man who wishes to clone his or her body to preserve their legacy. Will you know how many lives you’ve taken then? Think about it now and end animal cloning to abort this inevitable future of eradicating immense numbers of human beings.
Animal Cloning

I said animal abuse.gosh Mitch hatin. If the telomeres are worn down then people won't duplicate the animals a whole bunch of times. Just cloning once already makes double the livestock,etc. Plus what there are people who want to clone there pets. They can't have the separation between them when that pet dies. The emotional burden s too much . Wouldn't it be nice if you can have an identical copy of one of your best friends(dog, cat,etc.) Cloning has many more advantages than disadvantages.(http://www.pawnation.com...)
Animal Cloning

I never said people were against the experimentation on animals i said that people were against the abuse of animals, which is exactly what cloning is doing. Telomeres are a sequence of DNA on the end of a chromosome that protects the DNA code from harm when being duplicated (learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/chromosome/telomeres). Imagine the little plastic piece at the end of a shoelace that keeps the shoelace from fraying, the aglet, a telomere works a lot like an aglet. If the host nucleus of the clone has already duplicated many times then the telomeres could be broken down causing the short life span of clones. Why if there is no solution to this problem do we keep cloning animals which will live less than a quarter of their lives in some cases.
Animal Cloning

Ok first of all Mitch is a butthead trying to appeal to the voters by putting a whole bunch of visual things. No one cares Mitch. Second of all I was just saying that it's just one of many sources that can be used if need be. About earlier when you stated that the majority of people think negatively towards animal abuse/experimentation/messing with them, etc., a lot actually don't cause it benefits there businesses and they get a lot from it such as those who sell livestock or create dairy products,etc. Plus if a lot of people did care there would be a buttload of vegetarians/vegans.Mitch sucks Gina rules.WOO America.Love you Threadgill.(P.S> in the last round i forgot my cites so im putting them in this one)(mantaka.org, healthresearchfunding.org, animal-cloning.net, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, frossmont.edu, wisegeek.com)
Animal Cloning

(change.com is the source for the previous picture) http://www.youtube.com... If you would look at that video and tell me that one would have a better chance of survival from having foreign animal tissues and organs put in them rather than print them an organ identical to their own but healthier. Now that there is a solution to organ replacement another topic towards the FAILURE of cloning can be addressed. Human error is ever present in the reprogramming of an organism and can end hundreds of animals’ lives (learn.genetics.utah.edu). Why should a creature as oblivious and prone o error as a human get to play god an toy with the lives of animals and in the future humans? Though a clone can be almost exact down to the gene which is in the organism, a lot of things go wrong every single time a clone is produced. Even if a gene is programmed correctly and has all the right components to function and succeed as the scientists wish, there is never a guaranteed 100% chance that nothing will go wrong. There is always room for error and in this case that error is that genes can be expressed too early or too late in any situation of cloning.
Animal Cloning

We continue this research, even though there are some failures, because perfecting cloning would create results that would benefit us immensely. There would be a new source of needed organs and tissue. Cloning results in identical copies of an individual which can be used to produce animals with high qualities or useful properties such as Polly(not Dolly), a transgenic cloned lab, able to produce milk containing factor IX, the protein deficient in hemophiliacs. Another very beneficial outcome is that transgenic animals that have been developed for the production of human therapeutic proteins ,other proteins, sources of tissues,cells , organs, etc. for xenotransplantation (Xenotransplantation is any procedure that involves the transplantation, implantation or infusion into a human recipient of either (a) live cells, tissues, or organs from a nonhuman animal source, or (b) human body fluids, cells, tissues or organs that have had ex vivo contact with live nonhuman animal cells, tissues or organs) make this more efficient, less expensive, and can be done faster and it'll just add another source if ever needed for transplantations/etc. This can help the treatment of human diseases. Cloning has many positive outcomes.
Animal Cloning

Our society views the abortion of young fetuses as wrong and inhumane but why then when so many animals die each time a clone is attempted we view it as a milestone of science. If the first successful clone,Dolly the sheep, was born in 1996(sciencedaily.com) then why in almost two centuries have these methods of cloning not been perfected? Why do so many clones still die? Scientists are responsible for the placing of cells in a host nucleus and also with reprogramming the cells to be adapted to that nucleus. Without an extremely advanced programing method (which we haven't yet uncovered what-so-ever) a clone's code is highly improbable to be perfect each time( learn.genetics.utah.edu). This sheep is one of hundreds upon thousands of failed clones. In this day and age you would think finding pictures of about anything would be easy, but if one were to type "failed clones", or "clone malformations" into a search engine for pictures, nothing comes up that is highly credible: why? The answer is because scientists wont publish a failed clone or even the failed results because they know that it will statistically and ethically destroy the legitimization of their research.
Animal Cloning

Although some clones don't last long and are deformed,the problem can be fixed. Animal cloning can help towards biomedical research. Cloning can produce genetically identical laboratory animals which can be used as models for malformations and diseases. With this researchers can address the issue with the deformations and short lasting lives of the clones. Plus this provides models for studying interaction of nuclear versus mitochondrial genes and for nuclear versus cytoplasmic factors.the research from animal cloning can benefit our knowledge. Jean Paul Reynard of the National Institute of Agricultural research in France is attempting to produce cloned transgenic rabbits to study cardiovascular disease in hopes of finding a new treatment. Animal cloning can help medical research improve which can stop the deformations in the clones and could also help in the future for animals that have been hurt providing them healthy organs,cells needed tissues,etc.(mantaka.org)(healthresearchfunding.org)
Animal Cloning

Deformations of animals are an inhumane thing to see or to cause. Cloning has a success rate of about 1-30 clones out of 1000 that are successful (learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/animal/cloning). Cloning can cause deformations and mutations, such as grossly oversize heads, double-headed animals, grotesquely twisted limbs, bloated fetuses, and even malformed organs (endanimalcloning.org). Some people think that only the clones themselves are hurt by this disease but in fact even the surrogate mother (organism used to carry the cloned fetus) also contracts disease and mutations. Not any regular malformations take place anything from death causing disease and life ending bone failures can occur (endanimalabuse.org). Animal cloning is sick, inhumane, and if ones beliefs lie with the topic of ending animal abuse then ones beliefs should lie with the end of cloning.
Historical parallel

I can't tell what you mean by this, but I'm assuming that you're against the rallies. These rallies are probably the only good thing going on in America right now. Trump is a horrible president, and the entire country is about to implode on itself, with all the gun control problems, the despicable immigration prison camps, racism, police brutality, the abortion debate, the threat of nuclear war, the fact that we have a white-supremacist narcissistic president leading us, and who knows what else is happening. And what has our president done to help fix any of this? he deserves to be rallied against. As for our image? The rest of the world should hate us! We've bombed and destroyed more places than we can name, we pulled out of a climate change deal, withdrew from the human rights council, have had over 100 mass shootings this year. Despite the brainwashing that we've all been fed, America has never been a good country, and it's about time people realized this.
Historical parallel

Alright, I'm sorry, I officially have no clue what it is you're saying. Are you agreeing with me? I cannot tell if the last paragraph is what Trump is saying or what you are saying. Did you go to the rallies against Trump, or do you think that the Rallies shouldn't have been held? What I'm going to guess, is that you were simply comparing Trump to another historical figure who was just as bad as him (there have been many, I'm not sure which one you mean, though), and you don't want America to be judged for Trump's actions. (If that's what you're saying, then (while America has been very problematic since long before trump was president) I agree). As for the last paragraph, that does seem to be what Trump is saying: (in extremely simplified terms) "I am great, and those who disagree with me should be punished. I am right, and i will weaken my opponents through force and through abusing my power." I think we agree, but I'm very sorry, i don't understand your wording.
Historical parallel

First post so sorry if it seems like I"m just feeling my way thru: I was trying to draw a parallel to another historical figure that had rallies after the race. Somehow I was expecting a pro trump to jump all over it. I was just wanting to state my observation that there was once an elected head of state that did the same thing. Wouldn"t be the first to do it, but this one seems ominously close to something that I will be held accountable for even though I railed against it. Similar nature To illustrate: At a political rally I say any dissenters take them out and beat them up I will pay for your legal expenses. Lock up my dissenters. I don"t have to pay taxes i"m the fuhrer. Someone other than our own people is to blame. Separate the parents from the children so they put up less of a fight, then separate the women from the men so the men put up less of a fight, then gas them all
Faith is TRUST, not positive thinking

My opponent had forfeit this round, so let I post my argument. What's faith? Why does God need us to believe, to have faith to be able to be saved? Well yes like my opponent said, faith is just simply trust, but it's different with God, because trust in God not just let Him has control in your life but also that act of trusting can also lead you to power, God's power for human being. Let's us take look at the story of Jesus and His disciples in the storm: "4:39 And he arose, and rebuked the wind, and said unto the sea, Peace, be still. And the wind ceased, and there was a great calm. 4:40 And he said unto them, Why are ye so fearful? how is it that ye have no faith?"(Mark 4:39-40) Now let's us discuss this part, what if they didn't woke Jesus up? What if they just simply pray? Do you think the whole situation will change? Yes, indeed. Because they didn't believe, they didn't have faith enough therefore the storm will come and they won't be prepared. Your topic of argument is :"Faith is trust, not positive thinking.", well let's us look at this other Bible verse: "6:25 Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?"(Matthew 6:25) If you trust, you not just need some positive thinking, but also positive manner, to believe God will do good things, and everything God does are good. Thank you.
Faith is TRUST, not positive thinking

First of all, again thank you for this debate, you and I finally get to see again and get to debate again. Faith, a trust and royalty to God, like you said, yes faith is basically trust and loyalty, but to say that faith has no power is just a simple and bold statement without back up. "When you have that type of faith, there is no need to bombard God with "positive thinking" or "professions of faith". You can live your life trusting His plan fully, knowing that there is little you want to change about what He does and does not do. After all, we cannot possibly understand where the future is headed. It's better in the hands of One who does know. But, it takes trust to feel that way." +What do you mean by positive thinking or professional faith? So you say that we should give God negative thinking and amateur faith? You can't live your life and trust Him fully if you keep thinking negative such as: "Will God let me to Heaven?" or "Is there really a God?", no faith can allow negative thoughts, when you afraid, when you have negative thoughts, those are symptoms of what we call: "Doubting Syndrome" "So, to start us off, faith is an ever-growing state of complete trust, whatever that faith may be in. The more it works and proves itself out, the more you trust, thus growing your faith" + True, I totally agree with this statement. "So, stop stomping up and down commanding God to do things and trying to create things with your fake positivity. That's not faith - it's either stupid or it's witchcraft. Just because you convince YOURSELF of it, doesn't make it true - especially when it all fails." That's not stomping down and command God, it's called praying, having faith, think if you pray and never think it will become true, then how can you call that's faith? Like Jesus said in John 14:13-14 " And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Son may bring glory to the Father. You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.". Remember what did Jesus said before He rose Lazarus back from dead, what was the great sentence that came out of our Lord lips? It was:"Do you believe this?', yes, just a little faith we can move a moutain, that's the power of faith.
Faith is TRUST, not positive thinking

Many teach and believe that faith is a mystical power that one can summon to convince God to do things on their behalf. They believe in "naming and claiming things" and "speaking things into existence." This debate will allow us to explore the true essence of faith. It's not a superhero power and it cannot be faked. It is a plain and simple trust in the thing you have faith in. When you have that type of faith, there is no need to bombard God with "positive thinking" or "professions of faith". You can live your life trusting His plan fully, knowing that there is little you want to change about what He does and does not do. After all, we cannot possibly understand where the future is headed. It's better in the hands of One who does know. But, it takes trust to feel that way. So, to start us off, faith is an ever-growing state of complete trust, whatever that faith may be in. The more it works and proves itself out, the more you trust, thus growing your faith. So, stop stomping up and down commanding God to do things and trying to create things with your fake positivity. That's not faith - it's either stupid or it's witchcraft. Just because you convince YOURSELF of it, doesn't make it true - especially when it all fails.
Faith is TRUST, not positive thinking

Thank you for the come back of my opponent: "First, the Bible doesn't ever state that God NEEDS us to believe in order to be God or to act on our behalf. Faith is not a conduit for God's decisions, but a mindset that trusts Him to make the best decision possible." No God then faith has no meaning, therefore yes, God does not need us to believe to do something, but God needs us to believe so therefore His miracles, His power might be perform through us, as it was in the story of Jesus and the blind man in John 9:3 " "Neither this man nor his parents sinned," said Jesus, "but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life.", or the story of Jesus rose Lazarus back from dead, Jesus asked his sister about her faith: "And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world. "(John 11:26-27) Any of God miraculous signs to do to anybody, He always requires one thing, faith. "Surely, this can create a POSITION OF POWER. knowing that we are freed from worry and doubt. It also frees us from having to constantly "cross our fingers" and make sure that we convince ourselves that God is going to do something because we now have "enough faith". After all, do you really think that you have faith if you have to convince yourself to believe?" So you'll convince yourself that God won't do a thing? No, faith do not make us convince ourselve that God will do something, faith put into you that God will answer your prayer. "This was a great scripture because it provides so much support for my argument. Jesus' point was not that they did not pray - it was that they HAD FEAR. Praying when the storm came would have resulted in the same situation, since it would have been DUE to the fear they felt. true faith would have allowed them to just fall asleep alongside Christ and the rest of those on the boat, fully trusting that God was not going to allow things to end badly." Fear is a part of humanity, we have nerves in our brain that when things come, we can be frightened, they were scared even before they woke Jesus up, it wasn't fear that Jesus rebuked them for, but for thinking that Jesus won't make the storm stop, the lesson is that faith can help you, faith have a power, Godly power, a conductor between us and God. Faith my friend, is a conductor to God that will open your heart and let His miraculous signs come into you, that's faith.
dbox is the worst person on debate. Org

Allow me to copy and paste the personal message I just got from dbox: "Hey! I'll have what she's having. My name is Inigo Montoya, You killed my father, Prepare to die. What the deuce? Eat my shorts! Screw you guys, I'm going home. It's like they say, 'get busy living, Or get busy dying. ' King Kong ain't got nothin' on me. You're a wizard Harry! I'm not superstitious, But I am a little stitious. You've gotta pay the troll toll. Be more constructive with ya criticism. What am I a clown? Zoink! "
dbox is the worst person on debate. Org

Pros argument is a non-starter and does not require refutation. Also, Pros final quote is problematic as it is self-indicting in view of his unproven ad hominem in P1 and "supporting evidence" in the form of purposeful mistruths in P2. Ironically, The list in Pros first post is turning out to be more and more self-descriptive in view of his conduct thus far. Respectfully, dbox
dbox is the worst person on debate. Org

In order to Con falsify what has been resolved, He/she must prove that there is actually something worse than them on this forum. Thus far, That has not been the case. "The Internet can be used as a place to have a greater positive impact on the world, There"s a ton of positive initiatives online. The web should be used to inspire others, Not spread hate or to hurt others. " - Justin Bieber "If you're insulting people on the internet, You must be ugly on the inside. " R13; Phil Lester
dbox is the worst person on debate. Org

Thank you for your response, For clarity's sake, I will remove the ambiguity of Pros deflective interpretation of my parable. Pros conclusions are invalid because he is arguably blinded by bias (". . . Stubborn Christian apologists love to babble. . . Religion is the worst. . . People like Con spouting nonsense. ") and completely unacquainted with me. Pro rather than proof, Offers appeals to spite, Ad hominem and most recently inventing false "direct quotes" in my name. 1)Debate No:117834 (comments)
dbox is the worst person on debate. Org

Con is trying to relate an age-old parable showing that conclusions drawn based on local premises are often not true globally. No argument here because my assessments are based on the big picture. Direct quotes from his other debates: "How do you get a Jewish girl's number? Roll up her sleeve" "What is Osama Bin Laden's favorite football team? The New York Jets" "I am all about rape awareness which is why I don't drug women" "What is the hardest part of a vegetable to eat? The wheelchair. "
dbox is the worst person on debate. Org

Two blind men come across an object blocking their path. A passerby explains to them that it is an elephant. Unknown to them what this was, They reached out to feel their way around the obstruction, The first proclaiming, "an elephant is like a spear! ", Having felt the tusk. The next said, "no it is more like a wall", Having touched the side. The gathering crowd laughed at the false assumptions.