Resolved: On balance, I am not a troll.

=Clearing up some misconceptions=1. Honestly, I'm very surprised the Prosecution hasn't brought this up yet but to prevent him from bringing it up in the last round where I can't refute him, I will refute it now. My infamous debate with iownu about who is a better troll (http://www.debate.org...), does NOT make me a troll. Just because I have skill at trolling (which I admit to in that round) does not make me a troll. For example, I have some skill at the Saxophone but that does not make me, on balance, a musician. The same can be said about trolling. Having an ability for it does not mean that I am one, that is a logical fallacy.2. Now, another thing the Prosecution might bring up in his last round are some previous debates of mine where I have performed poorly. I will explain why those do not make me a troll.Since the definition of "troll" specifically states "intent", the Prosecution must prove that my behavior in such rounds was intentionally bad. This is not the case. He cannot prove, for example, that I wasn't just new and un-used to the site and how to behave on it. Or I am just terrible at debate. Or perha something else entirely. Until my Opponent proves (or at least provides substantial evidence) that all of my "trolling" was intentional, I win this round. Innocent until proven guilty.=Rebuttal="by defintion we are all troll's" - The Prosecution contends that we are all trolls. That is false because A) the definition of troll states intent, and B) if we were all trolls, the word "troll" would not exist. As the famous saying goes "if everyone's rich, everyone's poor." In an online community a troll is a distinct member, and the Prosecution still has not proven my uniqueness I.E. trollness to this website."and you just admitted yourself that you are indeed a troll" -The resolution states "on balance" so even if I did admit that, it's irrelevant to the resolved until it's proven that I am a troll the majority of the time. "i was just saying that in an attempt to be nicer, it is your fault, the way you act and appear is the reasons why people desire you (which you didnt deny) both of these can be changed by you so you intended to do so." -thank you very much for trying to be nice. (I mean that honesly, too many people, esp. on the internet are not nice.) Now you claim that the way I "act and appear" is why these people "desire" (I believe you meant despise?) me. Again, you must prove that A) I have done actions, in the majority of my debates, that can be considered trolling, and B) that I did it with intent. Until that happens, I win this round."I did not decide it, i am going off the four baisc, yet broad catogory's used in the discription of debate.org" -however you still haven't made up for the fact that DDO has a miscellaneous debate category! So your entire contention one falls. "that is a fair statement, but you agree'd that you are a troll every time you debate" -Since you agreed that it's a fair statement that I win if you can't prove the majority of my debates are trolls, and your interpretation of what a "troll" is has been called into serious question, and you still have not proven that the majority of my debates are trolls, you just conceded.=The definition of Troll=This has been brought into serious question during this round, so now I must fully elaborate on what a troll is. The Prosecution contends that we are all trolls. He ignores not only the social context of the word troll, as I've already elaborated on (if everyone is a troll, no one is, he must show my uniqueness), but he's also ignoring the key word in the definition intent. Just to prove my point that intent matters, heres the link to Urban Dictionaries definition of troll. (http://www.urbandictionary.com...) Lets examine some more definitions of "troll". 1. "One who posts a deliberately provocative message..."2. "One who purposely and deliberately...."3. "...who makes idiotic posts in message boards newsgroups for the sole purpose of pissing people off..."ECT. So an intent/purpose is critical in trolling. The Prosecutions still has not shown my intent of trolling, and even admitted that it may not be my fault if I have trolled, so I win this round.=Closing=I know that many of you dislike me. I know that many of you think I'm a troll, however please, in the name of justice do not rule based on your personal belief. The Prosecution has not prove that I am a troll thus far, and his contentions no longer stand so please, vote Pro.The defense rests.