The Bible is reliable

Rebuttals1) Creation accountsNow, this is an interpretation of the Bible I had not heard of before, and I'm sure most people haven't either, but I believe most Christian religions do not believe that other humans were created before Adam and Eve. It's generally accepted by almost every Christian, Jew, and Muslim that Adam and Eve were the first humans[1]. It's a very unpopular belief to believe Adam and Eve were not the first humans. It doesn't seem to fit in with this belief that Genesis 1 is talking about other humans.Since we didn't discuss on what interpretations of the Bible are to be used, I assumed we would be talking about the general consensus by the Christian community. It makes sense to go off of that interpretation. With that interpretation, the contradiction still stands. 2) Bearing WitnessThe John 5:31 verse doesn't specify that it has to only be Jesus testifying. It just states if he testifies of himself, it is not true. Jesus later changes this to mean it is okay when someone else bears testimony of him.Also, going back to widely held Chrisitan Belief, The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are all one god, and in John 8, he cites the Father as his other witness, when that in reality, would be himself according to widely held Christian belief. So, this contradiction still stands when you apply widely-accepted Christian belief/interpretation. One has to use a different belief/interpretation in order to make this no longer a contradiction. As I said, it wasn't made clear by which interpretation we would go by, so I assumed the interpretation as held by majority of the Christian community would stand in this debate. If we were to allow any interpretation to be used in order to prove that these verses do not conflict, then of course there is no way I can win this debate because the debate would be stacked against me, since you could apply any interpretation you want in order to get around the idea that two verses conflict.If my opponent decides to make it that any interpretation applies, I won't continue to participate in this debate, because there is no way to argue against cherry-picked interpretations. Or maybe I will since voters may very well agree with me that it's a stacked debate if the defender of the Bible can go by any interpretation of the Bible, no matter how unaccepted it is.New contradictions:To make things clear, I'll continue numbering these after the order of the previous two, starting off with "3". 3) Does God desire animal sacrifices in the old testament?I will limit this just to the old testament, since it is generally accepted by the Christian community that Jesus' sacrifice replaced all need for animal sacrifices, which is why God doesn't condone animal sacrifices in the New Testament. Thus, it's only a contradiction if desire for animal sacrifice appears in the old Testament, and if it is then claimed he didn't desire them in the old testament.In Exodus 20:24, it reads "An altar of earth thou shalt make unto me, and shalt sacrifice thereon thy burnt offerings, and thy peace offerings, thy sheep, and thine oxen: in all places where I record my name I will come unto thee, and I will bless thee." God, clearly, desired animal sacrifices here, and there are a numerous other verses which point to God desiring animal sacrifices, but as agreed upon, I will only present two examples of contradictions at most. In Psalm 51:16, it reads "For thou desirest not sacrifice ... thou delightest not in burnt offerings."Here, it is stated that God clearly did not desire animal sacrifice. Again, there are numerous other verses in the Old Testament which say God did not desire animal sacrifices.4) Do Just people exist, or not?In Ecclesiastes 7:20, it reads "For there is not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not."That's pretty clear that just men do not exist.Then in Luke 14;14, it reads "But when thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind: And thou shalt be blessed; for they cannot recompense thee: for thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just. "And yet, there are apparently people who are just because they will be resurrected.Sources:[1] http://www.religioustolerance.org...