You are invited to attempt to prove the existence of your god

I will start by defining my belief of the existence of God firstly as a creator of the universe, and as you may take the stance there are numerous rebuttals to the god theory in this context, I will take the stance there are infact numerous rebuttals to science's theories on the non existance of a God. I would generally consider myself as a believer in the big bang theory as I believe it coincides with the belief in a god and will attempt to provide tangible, evidence for such claims. I will define my idea of the universe as I would imagine the same as yours, all matter, energy, galaxies, and intergalactic space as a whole. As far as your ideas on scientific theory go the laws of nature, evolution, universe ect in your thinking have been scientifically tested making them for you fact, God has not making him non existent. You are claiming that such laws which are immaterial, invisible, eternal, immutable, infallible, omnipresent, all powerful, unquestionable and transcendent are scientifically tested? However God has not. The laws themselves are not tested, regularities have. Such laws are invisible and immaterial. It is only effect which can be studied. Scientists have postulated the existence of laws to explain and describe regularities/effects. This in itself is assuming the existence of something remarkably similar to a god, which fills the same role of governing/sustaining the universe. Therefore if it is rational to believe in those laws it should be equally rational to believe in a god. Next on the subject of theory/fact if any theory was actually fact, this would make the purpose of science itself a contradiction, science is based on the ideology of debate, testing, new ideas and evolution of old ideas, so if all was fact there would no longer be a purpose for science. Why I think it is feasible that God created the universe. * If there was not a creator the universe and all within it are totally random and without any purpose * Assuming the big bang theory is correct, something must have existed prior to that big bang in order for it to have occurred, so if not a creator then matter itself must have existed. * if matter has indeed always existed, energy must have always existed but without an external force everything must itself run out of or indeed have come to be by way of that energy. It is not proven nor feasible that matter can create itself from nothing, nor that energy can create itself from nothing. * IT is impossible for movement to occur without being first affected by something else, the belief that movement can occur unaided is contradictory to a random/no purpose theory and concludes that a planned intervention caused that movement ie a creator. * Natural law, design and order in the universe conclude in a law maker, designer or order maker to exist. * Laws of logic point to rationality, they also show 'materialsm' is false because non physical causes exist. * scientific theory claims there to be more anti matter than matter, but if it is not 50/50 between the 2 this violates scientific law of balance * In an evolution without the idea created purpose and reason and rather randomness, how can life have begun to exist. Law of biogenesis proves life can only rationally come from life. A non god theory would have you believe that protein like substances formed from nothing, learned what was need to become/remain alive and reproduce, can random chance really be a more logical cause for this than a theory that the substances were created with purpose. * Science still continues to try and explain the big bang which avoids the explanation for an absolute beginning. I will continue on to what I mean by a material/spiritual brain on my next post as I do not have enough space left. This is so far my 'proofs' that a God may actually exist and that it was this god who created the universe.