Great Britain- The Anti-Christ's last stand

//1)The beast has a mortal wound// Point being? Just because one famous person has a mortal wound means they are the antichrist? //Revelation 13:3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed and all the world marvelled after the Beast: It is said that King Arthur died of a mortal head wound at the Battle of Camlann between 516-550 AD.// Yes, and so have millions, possibly billions of others. What makes this person different? Besides, King Arthur has never been proven to actually exist. He is a fairytale. Look at this article. http://www.baltimoresun.com... So these people who have been shot to the head are different how? King Arthur never recovered. 5% Of people who have been shot to the head have been. They are more likely than King Arthur. //The prophecy from the Revelation is clear that the one of the head of the beasts which was wounded is indeed King Arthur// No, it isn't. You have cited passages from the bible, and then claimed that they show the antichrist arising from Britain, and you never show how. Again, you connect nonexistent and, to be honest, quite silly points, and then proceed to say this proves everything, when all it does it make you look like you are off your rocker. //whose spirit will return and possess a British (includes Wales, England & N. Ireland) the axis of Evil. // How will his spirit return? He's not even real?And why would he posses a British country?! How could he do so, when countries aren't living? And, worst of all, you say his spirit will return and posses a British...A British what? You trail off, again. I am getting a migraine from just trying to decipher what you are trying to say. //There is a chance that the Revelation is pointing towards a future king possessing the spirit of King Arthur.// Two things. 1) You have yet to prove how, why, who, what, or when. You have also failed to prove how these nonsensical statements you are making correlate to Great Britain at all. 2)There is a greater chance my mother is a pile of pudding. //2nd Evidence 2)The Coat of Arms of Great Britain and Wales Second concrete evidence is that Great Britain has 3 slim lions as its coat of arms. Mark- I said 3 slim not strong lions. It is possible that those 3 lions had a body of a leopard.// What does this have to do with anything. As I have stated, this is mere coincidence. You have not even rebutted my previous arguments against this. Fail. And where in the world do lions and leopards come in!? //Let's not forget that the Welsh flag is a red dragon. I am sure I have talked about the red dragon in the revelation.// Erm, I don't think you have. And, again, I have a poster of a dragon in my room. Am I going to spawn the antichrist? I think not. Your points are irrelevant and failtastic. //3rd Evidence 3)European Union – the Revived Roman Empire As I have mentioned earlier that Rome is too weak to rule the European Union so Europe wants a nations that is strong to rule the entire "continent." Who is the suitable country to lead such a huge confederation? France- No, Germany- No It should be a country that can sustain itself- yes look north towards Great Britain.// And, again, why can't Us, Japan, India, China, or Russia be the birth of the antichrist? You assume it will automatically be in Europe. Also, why is Rome too weak? Why are France and Germany too weak? You have given no evidence why. For your 4th argument, you prove that the antichrist is not from Isreal. This is irrelevant. It has nothing to do with the main argument. You just eliminated one country out of the hundreds in the world. Not a big difference. My arguments still stand, as he has not even responded to them. As of now, I am incredibly sick, and I still make a better argument than my opponent. My arguments extended, my opponent's are nullified. Vote Con, or whatever. Bleck.