Perfect Symmetry in Honeycombs is Proof of God

HONEYBEES' PREFECT HEXAGONS Did you know that honeybees design the most perfect hexagons known to man? It"s very difficult to produce a hexagon in which all six sides are exactly the same length and all six angles are exactly equal. In fact, it has proven impossible for human beings to do so. Throughout history, the world"s greatest artists and mathematicians alike have always been frustrated in their efforts to produce the perfect hexagon shape. Some are able to produce better ones than others, but nobody has ever been able to produce an absolutely perfect one. In fact, even the world"s most sophisticated computers have never been able to produce a perfect hexagon shape: There has always been some discrepancy of length and symmetry, whether large or small, among the six sides and six corners in all man-made and computer-made hexagons ever produced. Human beings simpy don"t possess the intelligence necessary to design a perfect hexagon -- not even with the assistance of the most advanced modern computers. However, the hexagons that honeybees produce are different: A cross-section of the hexagonal capsules that honeybees design and build to store their honey reveals exactly symmetrical angles and six sides of exactly equal length -- hexagon shapes more consistently accurate than any human being or computer has ever been able to design. Computer scientists have always been baffled at the fact that honeycombs are so perfectly designed that their computers can"t even calculate the angular and symmetrical accuracy of their hexagonal shapes; when using computers to study the angular and lengthwise symmetry of honeycombs, the accuracy of the shapes in the honeycombs is always found to exceed even the limits of perfection that can be programmed into the computers: The honeycombs themselves always exceed the perfection of the most sophisticated scientific standards of measurement available. The hexagonal shapes that the honeybees use for their honeycombs are also the most efficient possible use of building material. Out of all the shapes that can fit together in a grid, the hexagon shape is the one that requires the smallest amount of edge material (the total length of the lines that make up their outer edges is very short compared to the lines present in other shapes). In other words, the ratio of total length of edge material to inner volume is smaller than that of any other possible grid shape. This means that honeycombs require less wax to construct than any other possible grid design would require. How do the honeybees know how to design and produce such perfect hexagonal shapes, while the best human artists, mathematicians, and scientists in the world are unable to do so? Also, how do the honeybees know that the hexagonal shape is the most efficient use of their beeswax? What is the original source for this amazing fund of intelligence? There are only two possible sources for such advanced intelligence: 1. The younger honeybees learn how to design perfect hexagons from other, older honeybees who already possess such intelligence, or, 2. The honeybees don"t actually know anything about geometry or about producing hexagons, they "just do it" without necessarily possessing any intelligence. In the first case, tracing this system of learning from older honeybees back in time, there would have to have been a first honeybee who knew how to design perfect hexagons, who began this system, and who taught it to the others who didn"t yet know how, then those honeybees taught the same knowledge to younger honeybees, and so forth. The main problem with this conclusion is that honeybees cannot reproduce at all without honeycombs (honeybee eggs require honeycombs in order to develop and hatch), so it would have been impossible for this supposed "first honeybee" to have ever had any contact with any honeycomb, or to have ever hatched from an egg, and therefore impossible for her to have ever existed at all. So this cannot possibly be an accurate explanation regarding the source of the honeybees" intelligence to design perfect hexagon shapes. This leaves only option 2. However, this option implies a much larger problem: If the honeybees don"t possess the intelligence to design perfect hexagons, then how is it that they manage to produce perfect hexagons? If the intelligence doesn"t come from bees, then from what source does this intelligence originally come? Intelligence is a function of consciousness, and only living beings possess consciousness. Non-living things such as minerals, water, fire, chemicals, air, electricity, radiation, and other non-living objects and energies possess neither consciousness nor intelligence, so the intelligence required to design the perfect hexagons found in honeycombs could not possibly come from any non-living object or energy. So, if the intelligence required to produce perfect hexagons comes neither from bees, nor from non-living matter, nor from non-living energy, then what is its original source? The only rational conclusion is that the intelligence comes from a living, conscious being other than bees. This living, conscious being must necessarily possess greater intelligence and knowledge than the human race possesses, because all human beings also lack the intelligence and knowledge to produce as perfect a hexagon shape as the honeybees on this planet produce every day. So who is this living, conscious being who possesses greater intelligence and greater geometric knowledge than any human being? Is there some plant or animal that possesses such intelligence? No -- plants and animal species are never more intelligent than human beings. The only conclusion left is that there is a living, conscious, intelligent designer who is neither plant, animal, nor human, and who possesses greater intelligence and greater knowledge than the human race possesses. The scriptures reveal the identity of this intelligent designer as God. Other than God, there can be no rational explanation for the inherent angular and symmetrical perfection concretely and demonstrably present within the hexagonal structure of honeycombs.