The courts should be allowed to grant retrospective abortion orders

I should like to put his mind at rest by assuring that the retrospective abortion process will be operated on a completely professional and legal basis. To elaborate, any mothers wishing to protect world security by retrospectively terminating their pregnancies would first have the alleged future tyrant assessed by a qualified child psychologist who would then submit a report to the Court. A batch of such reports might read something like this: Name: Dick Tater Age: 11 Analysis: A dangerous, manically-depressive loner who exhibits an unhealthy obsession with guns and who is liable to walk into school armed with a high-powered firearm and indiscriminately shoot students and teachers before turning the gun on himself, but who is not intelligent enough to pose any serious threat to national security. Recommendation: Counselling and possible incarceration in a juvenile detention facility. Name: Polly Stait Age: 13 Analysis: A very badly behaved young lady indeed, but more interested in fashion and music than world domination. Recommendation: Medication. Name: Des Pott Age: 10 Analysis: This boy is properly mental, but too retarded to cause destruction on a wholesale basis. Recommendation: Remedial schooling. Name: Anne T. de-Mocratique Age: 11 Analysis: A spoilt little brat who has a tantrum if she doesn't get her own way but, essentially, harmless. Recommendation: Parental tutoring. Name: Thackeray C. I. O'Toller Age: 12 Analysis: This cynical and calculating youngster exhibits psychotic tendencies, has delusions of grandeur, is very aggressive who does not tolerate dissent. He is a religious fundamentalist who has a very real potential to develop into a dangerous tyrant that could seriously threaten regional, national or international security. He is an extremely naughty boy. Recommendation: Retrospective abortion. Name: Holly Korst Age: 8 Analysis: This frothing little nut-job uses torture procedures on her dolls but there is no indication, at this stage, that she has any ambition to harm real people. Recommendation: Review case in one year. Name: Sue Easside-Bommer Age: 12 Analysis: Has ADHD. Recommendation: Medication. Name: T. R. Anne Yee Age: 13 Analysis: A lovely young lady but is very sexually-promiscuous which upsets her devoutly religious parents. Recommendation: Refer to social services. Name: Jenny Syde Age: 11 Analysis: Has Obsessive Compulsion Disorder. Recommendation: Tell her to chill out. Name: Juan-Pat E. Roole Age: 10 Analysis: Thinks he is the reincarnation of Napoleon Bonaparte - the classic fruitcake, but quite harmless. Recommendation: Lock him up in a loony bin and throw away the key. Name: Terry Wrist Age: 9 Analysis: An out-and-out nutcase, whois highly-strung (and perhaps should be) but is essentially quite harmless. Recommendation: Medication. You see, only the most dangerous children will be recommended for retrospective abortion, and even then, their cases will be properly judged by the courts, with due leave for the parents to appeal if the court decides that the child should be allowed to live. My opponent's final objection was "Such a law could easily be considered legalized murder. " The same argument can, and has been, used against the death penalty, which according to his profile, he supports and which is legal in his own country, so this argument doesn't hold water. That, and the hereinabove mentioned points, should convince you to support this motion and duly vote Pro. Thank you.