Christianity is the most inclusive faith, despite the fact that it is accused of being exclusive.

Buddhism is far more inclusive the Christianity, in that you don't need to be a Buddhist to be included. If you do bad you get to try again, if you do good you get to try again, eventually everybody will do perfectly and achieve nirvana. As far as faiths go, everybody is already included is as broad as you can get. To say that it excludes stupid people is wrong and rather naive as far as the tenets go. In Christianity "good people" can be excluded because they don't believe in Christianity. How is that inclusive? Your argument is that anybody can get into heaven within Christianity all they need to do is be Christian. What if they aren't? Seriously, Gandhi... Gandhi was a Hindi and is currently burning in hell for not accepting Jesus as his Lord and Savior. John 3:18, 36 - He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already .... He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. You do not get to tally up those those who *COULD* convert to your religion to argue that your religion is inclusive. That isn't being inclusive, that's allowing people to be included. Further there are some religions which have a doctrine of Universal Salvation such as some sects of Unitarian and Quakers. That says that ultimately everybody goes to Heaven regardless what they believed or did. How do you possibly beat that? Your claim that your religious faith has a potential to have all 6.3 billion people saved... well in some religious faiths, all 6.3 billion people are already saved. -- Trump that. --- Let me make a couple quick points to the readers. I am not arguing the truth of Christianity just whether or not Christianity is the most inclusive faith. The claim that it is perfectly inclusive is wrong on the grounds that it doesn't include non-Christians. Some religions actually do believe that everybody goes to heaven. Buddhism believes everybody gets reincarnated, whether they are a Buddhist or not. I am not arguing whether Luna's faith is correct or faiths which say that everybody goes to heaven are correct. I am pointing out that everybody goes to heaven is more inclusive that everybody who believe what I believed goes to heaven. --- Christianity is not one faith, it is a large umbrella group of religions, sects, and cults. There are thousands of subgroups and many of them are absolutely convinced that the other groups are going to hell because they don't believe what the first group says. A friend of mine said of his fundamentalist upbringing that he 'grew up in a city of fifty thousand with a church on every block and thought that he was the only Christian in town.' The majority of Christians are very exclusive... you need to be a Christian to be saved. That isn't wrong or right, I'm not judging but I am pointing out that other faiths are more inclusive than that. However, different sects and religions exclude other sects and religions from being accepted. Case and point, when Luna was listing "other faiths", Catholicism was included as one of the non-Christian faiths. Further, several months ago the Pope made a statement that non-Catholics were flawed Christians on the wrong path. http://www.cbsnews.com... This is inclusive? --- Further, allow me to point out a flaw in reasoning here. Matthew 12:32 - And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. Blasphemy against the holy spirit is unforgivable; I deny the holy spirit. So apparently you can be excluded. --- Personally I don't see declaring everybody to be bad and evil is very inclusive. That always strikes me as rather vindictive and petty. Though, all in all it says nothing about including or excluding people. Christianity is the only faith in which you can't earn your way into heaven and everything you do is going to fall short? However since the bar was set too high, Christ sacrificed himself to himself and let everybody in so long as they revel in his blood. Going from excluding everybody to including Christians. However, some faiths claim you are already saved even without a word or a belief. That good people go to heaven because good people go to heaven. The idea of salvation by faith alone may be fairly inclusive. If Hitler dropped to his knees and ask Christ for forgiveness before he died he'll be up there to greet you at the pearly gates. Gandhi however is burning in hell. It's an odd sort of inclusion, rather than strict criteria the only criteria is that you have to be Christian. However, that criteria is demonstratively most strict than other faiths employ. Although some other faiths like Islam view Christians as people of the book and many adherents believe that good Christians will go to heaven. Here you need to weigh the difference between including sinners vs. including good people of other faiths. I contend that there are fewer evil Christians getting salvation under Christianity than there are good Christians getting salvation under Islam. And again... universal salvation within some sects is one hell of a trump card.