Creationism as truth should not be taught in schools (Contender: Con)

Evolutionary experiments all ended in failure- no living creatures were created? How does this contradict creationism? Absurd accusation! What I do not understand is why anyone, would still hang onto a subject like Evolution that every science experiment done to date has proven to be false as none resulted in life and Creation of an animal of any kind. That means Life did not occur as science has claimed and should be abandoned not welcomed, or embraced. Evolution now is not even a theory as all results have shown it was, is, and shall continue to be impossible to create animal life from inorganic objects, or from nothing. Life cannot exist on earth by any lightning strike, cosmic soupings big bangs, nothing explains how life began …. Unless life was placed here by another way. The fact that an ovum is required to produce a biological creature of any kind, proves Life was placed here, not randomly, but purposely. That means an intellect placed everything here from the beginning, and since no one from this age or those of past generations were here at the time, we have only history with which to draw …. And not the 1800’s , but earlier much earlier, like say 2000 years ago. Evolution was not ever discussed in pre 1800’s era, so why whould you grab onto something that was posed by an individual who was not there and could not prove his theory during his own lifetime? And even he was sensible enough to recognize what was wrong with the theory. “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms. ”~Charles DarwinOnly 6 that are believed, not proven to be in the entire fossil record? Absurd! Be rational …. . 8.7 Million separate species from 1 animal? Absurd! “I concluded that this great group had been suddenly developed at the commencement of the tertiary series This was a sore trouble to me, adding as I thought one more instance of the abrupt appearance of a great group of species. ”~Charles Darwin“On the sudden appearance of groups of Allied Species in the lowest known fossilferous strata: There is another and allied difficulty, which is much graver. I allude to the manner in which numbers of species of the same group suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rocks. ” ~Charles Darwin“Consequently, if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer. ” ~Charles Darwin“The several difficulties here discussed, namely our not finding in the successive formations infinitely numerous transitional links between the many species which now exist or have existed; the sudden manner in which whole groups of species appear in our European formations; the almost entire absence, as at present known, of fossiliferous formations beneath the Silurian strata, are all undoubtedly of the gravest nature. ” ~Charles DarwinSurely if nothing else you would think you would have believed the Creator of Evolution it’s self’s look at reality. But No. bacteria created by science remains bacteria today- not an animal in the lot! To this very date evolutions theories have all, let me repeat all have resulted in no animal life! When hundreds of experiments fail to produce the desired outcome, you don’t accept it anyway, you throw it out and start again on another theory. The theory of Evolution has been scientifically proven wrong, and it’s time to consider another option. You don’t want to accept God as an option? Fine (that’s your loss) but come up with something better … like try and prove we were put here by aliens or SOMETHING …. I mean you’ll end up in Hell anyway cause you denied your God outright. Again, Fine, but at least put something on the table that is still a possibility no matter how weird or wrong it might be …. . just don’t put something up there EVERYONE KNOWS IS WRONG! At least have the intelligence to LOOK to see if there is validity not just ignore it completely on personal bias! a-bi-o-gen-e-sis Word Origin1. the now discredited theory that living organisms can arise spontaneously from inanimate matter; spontaneous generation.2. the theory that the earliest life forms on earth developed from nonliving matter. Compare biogenesis. . http://www.dictionary.com...The easy way out is for Pro to show us an example of a creature created by evolutionary experimentation, abiogenesis, lightning striking, cosmic souping . Show a bacteria becoming a living creature or if you can’t put up, don’t step up. "Honestly which is harder to believe. That a single creature formed without an ovum and morphed into 8.7 Million separate species (of which No Evidence currently exists)"Wikipedia? That’s your evidence … and how did you prove transitional as opposed to completely separate species …. You couldn’t and can’t they are scientist attempts to attempt to continue to claim something they themselves could never prove …. they cannot claim pre-existing animals, none of which they can show how it got here! The Miller Urey experiment has been able replicate several organic compounds. Yet could not show that any of his experiments produced a single animal … or he would have posted it. Desperation breeds contempt! The Judgment of the Dead11 Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. The earth and the heavens fled from his presence, and there was no place for them. 12 And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books. 13 The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what they had done. 14 Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death. 15 Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire. I am not gonna blow sunshine up your skirt when THIS is what your going to face at the moment of death! I owed you the truth, and that has been given, I can do no more, the rest is up to you. Keep believing your lies, or wake up before it’s too late! That choice I made clear at onset was and is entirely up to you? Exactly how was this ever anything OTHER than creation versus the lie of evolution? If you cannot see the evidence which is readily available in genesis 1, you’re an adult look it up. See if it doesn’t answer all the theories evolution scientist could not prove.1. Creation of all species, as adults- explains why ovum’s can be produced for reproduction2. Creation of all plants, trees grasses with seed produced within themselves, to perpetuate growth and replication.3. Explains presence of males to fertilize ovum’s4. Explains insects to pollenate plants for replication5. Explains why it was possible to have 8.7 million different species. And not 1 to create 8.7 million separate species.6. Explains why God created earth for life to exist upon, using atom.7. Explains the uniqueness of humans as no other creature comes close to man in abilities. Man can resolve problems, build buildings, create electricity, create food sources, create water sources where none exist … things no other living creature can do. 8. Explains why man has a soul, and has freedom of choice while all other creatures react on instinct alone.