wikipedia should be considered a valid source

I believe that, for the most part, Wikipedia has evolved into a reliable source for information. Perhaps, in the beginning, it wasn't nearly as reliable. But, today, Wikipedia is generally a good source of reliable information on the Internet. As a user-generated, evolving form of information, Wikipedia becomes more and more accurate every day, and the prejudice against it for providing misleading information becomes less valid. Wikipedia has many checks for data accuracy and, for the most part, should be trusted. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia where entries are written by the users of the site. Even though people can be mistaken in their facts, whether on purpose or accident, Wikipedia has set up measures to ensure the most accurate information. Users are allowed to question articles and questionable articles have alerts posted at the top of the page. Therefore, although Wikipedia articles may not all be completely true, for the most part, the information is accurate. Wikipedia is a reliable source of information; articles are written and edited by experts. Wikipedia is not perfect, since corporate propaganda and misinformation is deliberately put into pages at times. However, the review system in place usually means that these isolated incidents are caught and corrected. With older encyclopedias, information could quickly become out of date, and many relevant topics might never even be covered. With Wikipedia, anyone can submit an article, which means that in niche or obscure topics, an expert on that subject matter can actually provide their insight and knowledge. The ability for it to grow and stay current is essential in the modern communication age. Content of Wikipedia is often a reliable source for information, due to its credible citations. Using Wikipedia is often a good source for obtaining reliable information, assuming that you ensure that proper citations have been given to the information. However, most times you are able to find citations to credible sources within the Wikipedia article. Therefore, it is my opinion that Wikipedia is often a reliable source to find information. 86 % of errors are corrected by moderators......http://www-users.cs.umn.edu... Wikipedia is monitored for the accuracy of its information so that you can believe it. It's is many peoples jobs to patrol Wikipedia and ensure that all the information posted is relative and accurate. Because many hundred people use the site and update the information, it is unlikely that they would leave incorrect information there. Also, no one information site should ever be used as your sole source of information. Wikipedia is a great source of information. Wikipedia is a useful tool for research. Yes, the information is provided by users, but since many people use the material, it is often confirmed by many people. One should always take it with a grain of salt and should use other sources to confirm the information. Wikipedia is like anything; it should be used wisely. I have used it for a number of years and have been able to confirm the data independently. wikipedia is very reliable due to the fact that wikipedia provides the scores of sources ............i looked up south Korea(because Korea's awesome and im half Korean) and wikipedia provided 193 sources....... these sources are very precise and the all deal with the topic.....opposed to search engines with usually return thousand of bits of info that's not even relevant. therefore wikipedia is a very reliable source my characters are running out pro should be voted for in this debate because I have proved that wikipedia is a valuable resource tool