The Christian God probably does not exist

God exists. There are Scientific and logic proofs to ground it. Firstly, just think about the Earth: .its size is perfect. The Earth's size and corresponding gravity holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases, only extending about 50 miles above the Earth's surface. If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible, like the planet Mercury. If Earth were larger, its atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, like Jupiter. Earth is the only known planet equipped with an atmosphere of the right mixture of gases to sustain plant, animal and human life. The Earth is located the right distance from the sun. Consider the temperature swings we encounter, roughly -30 degrees to +120 degrees. If the Earth were any further away from the sun, we would all freeze. Any closer and we would burn up. Even a fractional variance in the Earth's position to the sun would make life on Earth impossible. The Earth remains this perfect distance from the sun while it rotates around the sun at a speed of nearly 67,000 mph. It is also rotating on its axis, allowing the entire surface of the Earth to be properly warmed and cooled every day. What a coincidence... How many chances there are that Earth got all this features just by the accident? Secondly, think about DNA. How we already know DNA is a code. Scientists already know that the genetic code uses a 64-letter alphabet called codons. There is no way at all that this thing could have appeared by itself. It just impossible. Only mind can create it. Thirdly, lets think about ours universe appearing logically. Everything which has a beginning has a cause. The universe has a beginning. Therefore the universe has a cause. But God, as creator of time, is outside of time. Since therefore He has no beginning in time, He has always existed, so doesn"t need a cause. If gravity had been a little greater, all stars would have been red dwarfs, which are too cold to support life-bearing planets. If it had been a little smaller, the universe would have been composed exclusively of blue giants which burn too briefly for life to develop. Changes in the strength of either gravity or electromagnetism by only one part in 1040 would have spelled disaster for stars like the Sun. If the nuclear strong force were increased by 1%, almost all carbon would be burned into oxygen; an increase of 2% would prevent the formation of protons, yielding a universe without atoms. Decreasing it by 5% would have given us a universe composed only of hydrogen, without any stars. Had the nuclear weak force been slightly weaker, all the hydrogen in the universe would have been turned into helium (making water impossible, for example). If it had been appreciably stronger, then the Big Bang would have proceeded past helium to iron, making stars impossible. The ratio of the strong force to electromagnetism makes it possible for helium and beryllium to have a resonant frequency of exactly the same value as that of an excited state of carbon (the so-called "Hoyle state"), allowing the helium and beryllium to bind together to form carbon in the centre of stars. The Hoyle state (which our basic models say should not even be there, but is!) is 7.65 MeV above the ground state of carbon-12, but if it were a mere 0.06 MeV more or less than this, then the abundance of carbon in our universe would be very different. Without carbon there would have been no life. The spectral energy range of starlight is very close to the molecular binding energies of organic molecules. If it was to greatly to exceed this range, living organisms would be sterilized or destroyed; but if it was far below this range, then the photochemical reactions necessary to life would proceed too slowly for life to exist. The length of time that our Sun is able to continue to burn is constrained by both the strength of the gravitational force and by the ratio of the mass of the electron to that of the proton. A fine balance must exist between the gravitational and weak interactions. If the balance were upset in one direction, the universe would have been constituted by 100% helium in its early phase, which would have made it impossible for life to exist now. If the balance were tipped in the other direction, then it would not have been possible for neutrinos to blast the envelopes of supernovae into space and so distribute the heavy elements essential to life. The difference between the mass of the neutron and that of the proton is also part of a very delicate coincidence which is crucial to a life-supporting environment. This difference prevents protons from decaying into neutrons, which, if it happened, would make life impossible. If the neutron mass failed to exceed the proton mass by a little more than the value it does, then atoms would simply collapse. If the initial spread of matter in the universe had been a little less uniform then the non-uniformities would have condensed prematurely into black holes before stars could form, but if it had been a little more uniform, the inhomogeneities would have been insufficient to condense into galaxies. Intelligent life would be impossible except in a universe of three basic dimensions. For example, it is due to its basic three-dimensionality that the world possesses the chemistry that it does, which furnishes some key conditions necessary for the existence of life. In addition, the brain can only form in a 3D world. In 2D, neurons forming links to other neurons in the brain would be unable to cross over each other in order to reach all possible target neurons. In 4D, there would be too much "space", meaning that those same neurons would find it almost impossible to seek out and find any other neuron. Water, on which life obviously depends, is one of the strangest substances known to science. It is such a simple molecule, consisting of just two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen, and yet: It has one of the largest temperature ranges over which it exists in a liquid form. This has allowed there to be sufficient liquid water on the Earth for life to be able to continue throughout the many climatic changes that the planet has undergone in its history. If the H-O-H bond angle was very different from what it is, ice would not be able to form an open structure with very little strain on the bonds. As a result, ice is less dense than water - in fact, it is the only substance to be less dense in its solid form than in its liquid form. If ice was more dense than water, all icebergs would sink to the bottom of the ocean and, because heat rises, the water immediately above the ice would cool and freeze, and, eventually, all of the Earth's oceans would freeze from the bottom upwards. As it is, the ice form a protective layer on the surface of the liquid ocean, enabling sea creatures to continue living below while the ice is frozen above. Water also has a higher specific heat than almost any organic compound. This property allows water to be a store of heat and so stabilize the environment (otherwise the land would repeatedly bake and freeze). The thermal conductivity of water is also higher than that of most liquids, which again permits water to act as a temperature stabilizer on the environment (otherwise oceanic hot- and cold-spots would cause extremes of temperature). Water has a higher heat of vaporization than any known substance. This makes water the best possible coolant by evaporation, and living creatures use this to control their temperatures. Water's high surface tension, exceeded by very few substances, serves to make biochemical reactions more rapid, by allowing the water to "stick" to the molecules involved in the reactions and dissolve them. If all this fine tuning implies design, then there must be a designer. The universe has such a high degree of co-ordination and the values are so critical that such a universe could not have come about by chance. Somebody created it.