The Theory Of Evolution Is False

HelloPro again neglects to look at my arguments. In my statement I clearly stated homo sapiens and apes have a common ancestor and are not direct relations. This immediately counters Pro's first paragraph. In answer to my opponents "who made" comments, the answer is nobody. If somebody made it, it would not be evolution. Everything we see here is a result of atoms and molecules and everything coming together to form new things never before seen. I wish to remind my opponent Apes communicate through the series of screeching and yelling. That is their language. If Pro deems it necessary to bring up that point, I ask Pro; how do babies learn a language when all they can say is incoherent noises?I have looked at your links and I think they are interesting on how people can believe it. Darwin uses always "perhaps" he has no real evidence backing up his the evolution theory.Pro uses empty language here to justify Creationism. I wish to remind Pro ucg.org is a religious website and as such is biased. I wish to remind Pro the Smithsonian Institution uses repeated tests and real world evidence to repeately prove the theory of evolution. I invite my opponent to cite evidence of Creationism that is not biased and does not use the Bible but instead uses the real world examples. The Guardian Newspaper's Missing DayIn using this, it shows a failure by both The Guardian and Pro to research thoroughly. This "Missing Day" was already debunked http://www.snopes.com... & http://urbanlegends.about.com... and if someone so chose as to research in depth, they would see it as such. This debunks that argument by the Guardian and immediately puts the authority of this article as questionable. I ask that my opponent kindly provides 5 points from this article next round which I will specifically negate.UCG.org Trilobite AncestorUCG uses the Trilobite as evidence Evolution cannot exist. Before refuting this point, I wish to make clear just because something hasn't been found does not make the whole thing nonexistant. I also wish to point out UCG indirectly states Creationism is the easy way out when explaining life.The Trilobite can be traced to be related to a pre Cambrian ancestor that is discussed http://www.trilobites.info...Additionally, UCG uses this quote"One example of a living thing with exquisite engineering is the tree. It provides breathable oxygen for us while processing carbon dioxide, which would in high amounts in the air be toxic to us. It supplies wood, housing for birds, roots to limit erosion, fruit and seeds to eat, is biodegradable and gives shade. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, "A healthy tree provides a cooling effect that is equivalent to 10 room-size air conditioners operating 20 hours a day." How could something so complex arise from a random, undirected evolutionary process?"I wish to remind my opponent and UCG that a tree and its fruit was not made for humans. The tree uses a process called photosynthesis to produce energy for itself and a byproduct is O2. Wood is used to support the tree and to provide protection for its internal workings. I remind my opponent that nothing was made to be killed. Fruit is used as a container for seeds so they can be spread far and wide via solid waste and provide a better chance for offspring of the tree to survive.If my opponent so wishes as to find solid evidence for the theories UCG uses, I invite him to make good use of the last round to do so.I remind my opponent to please, in the future, provide sites that are well researched and cited. Thank you