Christians are NOT able to determine fairly if Jesus is really the True messiah

1) "Please show me that you are neutral when you look at those prophecies." One cannot be neutral AFTER reading the prophecies His Holiness Christ fulfilled. You either have to take the side of acceptance or rejection, and I respectfully say that you better have a good reason for either choice when facing God. I'll give you an example: A father looses his ring and just before his son leaves to school, he asks him to keep an eye out for it. On the way back from school there are 2 scenarios: SCENARIO A) The son is walking back from school when he suddenly sees a ring that could be his father's but decides to walk past it and head home. His father asks him if he has seen it, to which the son replies, "yes I saw a ring that looked like yours but I just didn't pick it up". The father asks, "why? It could've been mine", to which the son replies, "meh...wasn't my ring that's lost. You should've taken better care of it." The father at this point is frustrated to see that his son found a ring that look like his but didn't even care to pick it up and show him. SCENARIO B) The son is walking back from school when he suddenly sees a ring that could be his father's and decides to pick it up. His father asks him if he has seen it, to which the son replies, "Yes! I found it and here you go!". To the son's disappointment the father tells him that it isn't his ring but gives him a hug, thanking him for his care and effort in looking for it. Now, I ask you and anyone else who may be reading this, in concept which scenario is better? Scenario A shows us the careless of the son towards his father, and scenario B shows us that even though it was the wrong ring, the father still thanked him for putting time aside to look for it. Relating this back to Christ and His Message, if God asked you if you looked, will your response be like scenario A or scenario B, even though it could be wrong? Food for thought :) 2) "Rev 22:13" These are said by Jesus but He did NOT imply Himself as the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last. This was unquestionably God speaking through Jesus, as God had done in: Isaiah 41:4 = "Who has done this and carried it through, calling forth the generations from the beginning? I, the LORD--with the first of them and with the last--I am he." Isaiah 44:6 = "This is what the LORD says-- Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart from me there is no God." Isaiah 48:12 = "Listen to me, Jacob, Israel, whom I have called: I am he; I am the first and I am the last." In Revelations 1:8, the same sequence of words (Alpha and Omega) is use for the fist time in the NT when it opens and says, ""I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty." So clearly, God is speaking and Jesus is not implying Himself by any means. The phrase "alpha and omega" shows us that God is Eternal, the Beginning and the End. Just as a side note, the first letter of the Greek alphabet is Alpha and the last letter is Omega; This would be similar to referring to someone in English as the "A and Z" . So when Jesus is says Alpha and Omega, He clarifies by saying beginning and the end because Alpha and Omega are the beginning and the end of the Greek alphabet. Now why Greek? The first and last letters of the Greek alphabet were used because the New Testament (including the Book of Revelations), was originally written in Greek. 3) "Rev 22:14" This is part of a prophecy that is being revealed to Jesus and does not help your argument in relation to the debate title. 4) "Rev 22:16" Okay...how does sharing this, help you reinforce your Pro-side to this debate. My friend you have failed to produce any evidence in Revelations 22, where Jesus said "I am God"..You technically didn't fail because there is not reference to such a verse in the Bible and Jesus says no such thing. 5) "Conclusion" In conclusion, your last 2 arguments veered off the point of defending your stance on this debate and you failed to produce any scriptural evidence that His Holiness Christ did not fulfill the prophecies of the OT. Jesus Christ has fulfilled all prophecies and I respectfully invite you to re-read the Bible and be very familiar with the prophecies of the OT. Remember that rejecting Christ after you had once accepted Him, means that you in fact reject the whole Bible and even God Himself. So if you love God, then you will show respect and love for His Messenger and revisit your decision on leaving Him, because He hasn't left you :) A note to all my Christian brothers and sisters, I hope that as a non-Christian, I have done well in this debate and I hope I have represented you all just as well. And a note to Pro: Thank you so much for this debate, I learned a lot and I hope I can debate with you further in the future. Thank you and God Bless :)