The Earth is Overall, Flat

FINAL ROUND!!"So, I should have begun to suspect the misunderstanding at that point and given my opponent the benefit of the doubt that he wouldn't make such a ridiculous argument." You do know that me being a troll debater, I'm allowed to pull out my trap card technically any time right? It's just that I chose to argue about this topic is a serious, although twisted way. "...if these depictions were meant as premises to an argument designed to lead to that subliminal conclusion using "Gflat", it'd have been a ridiculous argument...."I was going to go that way, but I thought "Eh. Whatever. It's this guy's first debate. No need to troll him to uphold the resolution."Evidence of the 4th dimension/multi-dimension existence (sorry I forgot it the previous rounds, I was too busy and got slacked off on the research)http://www.delusionresistance.org...http://news.nationalgeographic.com...(Above link tells us the possibilities of multiverses caused by the Big Bang)http://home.web.cern.ch...http://www.space.com...(The link above shows how multiverses can be formed due to cosmic infaltions)http://physics.stackexchange.com...http://www.math.columbia.edu...(Above link provides hard evidence for multiverse)Below link also cites a scientific paper that suggests the existence of multiverse universes.http://www.fromquarkstoquasars.com...As you can see many research suggests that multiple dimensions/the 4th dimension exists rather than not. The possibility is simply too overwhelming to state "there is only one dimension, and that is the 3rd dimension". Flat=smooth? "It was and still is unapparent to me which argument my opponent was/is making..." Then I've accomplished the feat of confusing you. You see, I started this debate as a lure to those who used to argue about the spherical earth theory in a scientific way, then slap them in the face by talking about different perspectives (the earth from an ant's point of view, smooth versus flat, and finally the fourth-dimension theory to switch things up a bit). Obviously I would lose if I wanted to argue about the flat earth theory the normal scientific way, as photo evidence instantly smashes flat earth theory, and I couldn't exactly come up with any troll arguments about why the earth is flat. Anyhow, my point is supposed to be, our perspective of what is "flat", when compared to real life, shows that in fact the earth is flat, because a "Flat" surface is smooth. Like the table we talked about, it looks curvy but has a "flat" surface and is therefore overall "Flat". That round spherical ball does not have a level surface, but other than tiny bumps, the surface is pretty smooth and therefore "level", and "overall flat". You see, from a philosophical standpoint, when you connect smooth and flat together, then the Earth is "overall flat". I've said this before, but I'm repeating it just in case it's not clear. You seem to be a bit confused.IN CONCLUSION....-If I lose this debate I hope to have another debate with you, this time possibly on the big issues-This debate was interesting and helped me view things from a different perspective-I have proved that from a different standpoint and under philosophical circumstances, the earth is overall flat, and fulfilled my BoPVote me.