There is Likely No Conspiracy To Hide The Cure For Cancer

Okay, let's break this down! 1. My opponent states that the researches would be rich if they made a cure. I don't believe this, first of all it's not the researchers that are doing this, it's the companies. The company would lose business if the research team finds a cure. Second of all, we don't know how much money you would get for selling the cure, you get 3 billion dollars for treating it and there is no aggression towards you. Third let's use some logic here, you find a cure for cancer, but then you sell it for a high price. Do you really think human rights activist are going to turn a blind eye, your making people pay a really high price just for a cure that could save millions of people. And last but not least, it would be the researchers that would get the money not the companies that sell the drugs that treat the cancer. They are the one who gets that 3 billion dollars a year.Pretty sure the companies will do everything in their power to stop the researchers so they can continue profiting. 2. My opponent talks about non-profit cancer researchers. It's not the researchers making the money, it's the companies. My opponent then says " what possible reason would there be for a non-profit organization to intentionally hide the cure for cancer to stuff the pockets of corporations they have no allegiance to?", that's the thing, researchers and companies are not friends. The companies that make cancer drugs have so much money, don't you think they would do everything they can to stop these guy. 3. My opponent then talks about money, I already discussed the researcher part alot, saying that it's not the researchers who get the money it's the company. First of all let me state that money changes people, everyone knows this. So maybe if the leader of a large company has a kid with cancer, do you think he would allow a cure to be made for his kid, but let his entire company die, losing all his money? Before you pick either one, remember that money changes people for the worst. 4. In this one my opponent says there isn't any hard evidence to prove that companies are hiding the cure of cancer, well this is a debate, we are sharing our opinions if there is a hidden cure for cancer or not. I don't know how I would find out if it is hidden or not, I mean I think i'd rather take my chances arguing online then breaking into a company and finding out the truth, then getting arrested. But, even without evidence I could use common logic. Like I said, a drug company gets 3,707,706,880,000 dollars a year. This is a lot of money, these companies rely on people with cancer for their profit. If there is no more cancer, then their company will die out. You really think a rich person with 3,707,706,880,000 dollars is going to let a cure for cancer be made? No, it would destroy their company. My Conclusion: Companies are the ones who get the money, not the researchers. Second money changes people, you really think a leader of the drug company is going to let their company die over their kid? Like I said money changes people, you might think that money would never change you, but no matter who you are it will change you( oh and the mix of power will put the icing on the cake). Third, there isn't no evidence, this is why it's a conspiracy. This is why we are arguing about a conspiracy, but like I said we can use common sense. A company that makes 3,707,706,880,000 dollars a year isn't going to let a cure be made for cancer, it profits off cancer. So if cancer is made, then the company is going to die, and the money with it. So the leader of the company would do everything in his power to hide the cure, or stop it from being made.