Michael Jordan is the greatest player of all time

I'll start off by reiterating some things that Con has already said. Wilt Chamberlain holds 72 NBA records. ..72! Many of which most players agree will never be broken (100 points in a game, 55 rebounds, etc, 50+ ppg average). The fact that he was so dominant attests to his greatness as a player. Attesting to his greatness is the fact that he was so versatile. In different seasons he led the league in scoring, rebounding, assists (the only center to ever lead the league in assists), and if they would have record blocks, most experts agree he would have led the league in this category too. Now let's look at some of Michael Jordan's accomplishments. Michael Jordan's best seasons ever, he averaged 37.1 points a game. Wilt Chamberlain beat this four different times, by as much as 13 more points per game on average! Wilt's highest scoring seasons are in order, 50.4 ppg, 44.8 pg, 38.4 ppg, and 37.6 ppg. To claim the Michael Jordan, who is best known for his scoring, is greater than Wilt Chamberlain is obviously preposterous. Another thing that Jordan fans bring up is Michael Jordan's high field goal percentage, which stands at around 50%. However, Jordan's best season he was shooting .539 which is below the career average of Chamerblain! Wilt Chamberlain made over 72% of his shots in one season! It is clear who was the more dominant and "great" player. Now I will refute some of my opponent's points. My opponent's first attempt to discredit Wilt's greatness is the claim that when Wilt entered the league, average player height was 6'5.5. Surely, as time went on, the players got taller and therefore Wilt played in a smaller league? Wrong. The average height in 2008, just 5 years ago was 6'6.9. So you're telling me that in 40 years, players on average, are only an inch taller? This is because on an NBA roster you have 12 active players, and around 15 players total. Only 2 or three of these players need to be centers, or 7 footers. Most of these spots are filled up with guards and small forwards, between 6ft and 6'6. Obviously there will be more small players than large. 7 foot players. The "average height" statistic holds no weight here and doesn't accurately depict anything. The fact is there were other big players in the league, including Swede Halbrook, who at 7'3 was even taller than Wilt Chamberlain was. So my opponent's attempts at claiming Wilt Chamberlain dominated due to his size is unfounded. My opponent also tries to discredit Wilt by stating that he played more minutes. But in fact - this is a further testament to his greatness! The fact that he played basically entire games shows that he was not only more dominant than Jordan, but more durable. Also take into account that the rules were much more relaxed back then and players like Wilt Chamberlain receive "hard fouls" a lot more frequently. I would also like to point out that my opponent's claims that in Jordan's era, what Wilt "should" average are strictly opinion and are in no way fact or even verifiable. I would also like to point that Wilt Chamberlain averaged more points without the benefit of the three-point line, which Jordan every shot, Jordan was capable of scoring 1.5x as much as Wilt did, yet Wilt still scored more than Jordan. I would like to reiterate the initial motion that Wilt Chamberlain is the greatest player of all time, and that there are literally no stats that back up my opponent's claims to the contrary.