"Women" couldn't recognize EQUALITY if it slapped them in the face

I will respond to your rebuttals in Round 5, But why did you skip 2. 1 linking poverty to divorce with kids? In Round 3, I will focus on Marital issues in my SCENARIOS OF EQUALITY. === Scenario 3. 1 - Chores === Charles and Roberta got married in a typical whirlwind of romance and foolishness. After a year, Roberta awoke to the fact that Charles does significantly fewer chores than she--even though they have equivalent careers. True, They never discussed their preferred apportionment of household duties, But she now feels demeaned by the imbalance. --- Discussion --- This is what EQUALITY looks like in no-effort relationships. Feminism suggests that this situation is not Roberta's fault, Rather it is a female-hating culture. Actually, She bears a majority of the blame. Each spouse does what they choose to do. He is not oppressing her or forcing her to do more. If she wants to rearrange the balance, She needs to be "strong" and TALK to her husband about it. Or she can just do LESS. === Scenario 3. 2 - Growth === Huey and Violet both had strong career plans when they married. Surprisingly to both, When their first child was born Violet decided to play mommy, Not return to work. Huey feels resentment over her unilateral change in plans. --- Discussion --- This is what EQUALITY looks like in the real world. Agreements from youth are immature and change. Huey has several options to choose from: accept the new status, Be angry for a long time, Divorce his trickster wife, Etc. But each option has consequences. Which will make him the happiest? I a husband is the one who changes his mind about child care or work-life balance, It does not make him a misogynist any more than Violet. === Scenario 3. 3 - Child Care === Fran and Parker signed a prenup regarding dual careers, Assets, Chores, And sex. After each birth, They both take 6 weeks off from work, Then promptly outsource child care to a "preschool" for infants, Which is of course staffed only by women. --- Discussion --- This is what "EQUALITY" looks like in the feminist worldview. Somehow, The subjugation of poor women by rich women is never mentioned. If feminists really wanted employment parity, They would require daycares to have 50% male workers (The Guardian puts it currently under 2%). If feminists really wanted female equality, They would not degrade any woman with the inhumane task of "caring" for other people's children. === Scenario 3. 4 - Chivalry === Jen and Sean are not married, Yet over time their relationship has become strained. Their arguments routinely become quite vicious. In one of these, Sean holds a door open for Jen, So she slaps him across the face. Sean's response is to hit her back. (Please note that most abusive relationships are between unmarried couples. UPenn's "Dating Partners More Violent. . . " says it is 80%. ) --- Discussion --- Seemingly, This is a SCENARIO OF EQUALITY. So many complaints about inequality are based in real-world differences between most-men and most-women. Physical differences like this one are the easiest to see but they are not the only ones. Somehow, Feminism expects the patriarchy to apologize both when men are different-winners (stronger) and different-losers (protecting, Chivalry).