Does the God of the Bible exist

This is not a debate about Which Bible translation is the best one to use. This is a debate about the existence of the bible God. The Term is "Tanakh" which refers to the writings of the old testament not "Tanach" as my opponent uses. The spelling is what confused me.I have no idea what a "Tanach" is so I assumed it was something that was made up a few years ago. The way you are wording your arguments are intellectually dishonest and you use them as a distractions with combination of Red haring Fallacies and stating facts incorrectly to avoid answering my questions about your world view. The Following are claims you made without giving me any reason or evidence for me to believe that they are true and that you are not just be making these facts up. I am going to quote what you said in quotation marks and underneath my opponents quote write my own questions about the quotes in parentheses 1) "I remind my opponent that there is 40 differant bibles all saying something differant." ( How do you know there are 40 different bibles that say something different?) 2) "That since they believe Judaism's Tanach to be be the word of God then how is the bible correct when it is missing 19 books of the word of God." ( How do you know the bible is missing 19 books ?) 3) "for factual sake I will remind my opponent the King James version of the bible is not the first English bible. That the William Tyndale"s, Coverdale Bible, the Matthews Bible, the Great Bible, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops" Bible all are English bibles that predate the King James version of the bible." (Why should I believe that the bible translations you mention are older than the King James version and how do you know that to be true?) 4) "There is some changes such as how many commandments Moses brought from mount Sinai. My opponent as fail to understand that this was a challenge that all morality comes from the bible. It is clear that at least some morality comes from the Tanach." (How do you know that there are changes of how many commandments moses brought down from mount Sinai?) 5) "my opponent has again stated that we know the past will be like the present and future because of the God of the bible. My opponent as failed to answer the fundamental question of why they hold that to be true when the bible clearly states that is not true. The bible clearly states that if I have faith I will be able to walk on water, part oceans, move mountains, or reanimate dead bodies. I have not stated they are not possible, that would be an attack of spirituality it self, but have only shown that that would contradict how science sees the world." ( How do you know that the bible states that and it is not ture? What verse does it say that if you have faith those miracles will happen? how do you know that those miracles have not happen in the past or won't happen in the future for Christians. How do you know it is not possible for those miracles to not happen within science.) Fallacy - "but have only shown that that would contradict how science sees the world." Right here you committed a Reification fallacy which is attributing a concrete characteristic to something that is abstract. Science is an immaterial abstract so it can't see anything. 6) " I have a 1 year old son." (How do I know you have a 1 year old son and why should I believe it?.) 7)" I disagree with my opponent that it has too be the God from the bible. There are many thing that feel wrong deep down in side of me that the bible states is OK. There is many people that come to God and to the same objective morality with out the bible. We all understand things differently. Is it not more of a testament to the gloy of God that God as given humany so many way to understand God." (How do you know that morality doesn't have to come from the God of the bible? How do you know that objective morality exists ? These are 7 claims that you have made without giving me any reasons or evidence for. How do I know that you did not just make up these 7 claims out of your head? Why should I believe these claims without reasons or evidence for them. Lastly, objective morality has to come from the God of the bible. Only the God of the bible influenced the world since the beginning of human history as we can see from ancient Judism. All other ideas and interpretations of God is stolen from Judaism, including yours. Only the God of the bible is beyond human imagination. He is Triune which means he is one God that consist in three people, Father, Son and Spirit. Not three different gods but one God consistent of three people. As the bible verse says in ( 1John 5:7) [KJV] " For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." Also, one of the greatest mysteries of the bible is how could God become fleash and dwelt among us. As the bible verse says (1 Timothy 3:16) [KJV]" And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." The God of the bible has no beginning or no end, he is eternal as the bible verse says in (Revelations 22:13) [KJV] "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last." See if the God of the bible was made up by man then why can't man fully understand the nature of God. It is possible to make something up that your mind can't comprehend because that is a contradiction because if you created something then you have to know how it works. For example, I could not make a car because I have no idea how a car works or it's functions. It is impossible for a finite mind to grasp an infinite being like how God is Triune or How God became man or how does God have no beginning or no end. Most interpretation of gods have a something in common. They are consistent of 1 person which a human mind can imagine up. Your interpretation of God has a contradiction to it. He does not punish immorality. Lets take it to secular court of law for the sake of argument. Ok if a criminal is guilty of rape and murder and the Judge refuses to sentence the criminal than that judge is evil for his refusal to do what is right and justly punish the criminal. God is the ultimate Judge and how could your god be good if he refuses to do good and punish evil justly. If the judge in the court room is evil for refusing to sentence a rapist, murderer why doesn't that not hold true for your god. Only the God of the Bible is good because only he does the right thing when it comes to giving the wicked what they diverse like a morally good and righteous judge. either you can accept Jesus' suffering as payment for your moral crimes or you can pay for it yourself in hell but either way God did the right thing in punishing evil. It's just up to you if you want to get punished for what you deserve or trust in Jesus who already got punished. I challenge my opponent to give me reasons to convince me that his interpretation of God does not come from his imagination but from valid reasons.