Battlefield is a better game series than Call of Duty

Graphics:I'm not sure I agree that Battlefield has better graphics. If they are, it's certainly not by much. I would, however, like to better explain why graphics hold little weight to me personally.The first video game console I ever used was the original NES, and then the Super NES when it was released. Some of the most well-crafted games I have ever played were on those systems. The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past may very well be my favorite game of all time. While it was excellent for its time, compared to the graphics of todays games, the 16 bits that it bolstered are nothing. Even so, I still love playing it (gotta love emulators), and other games from that era as well. Don't get me wrong, though. I, of course, love the graphical improvements games have made over the years. In my eyes, they basically rank in as a bonus, rather than a necessity. For instance, I love Minecraft. Graphics are no where near a strong point in it, but the gameplay, along with the nostalgia of playing with legos as a kid, more than makes up for it.Drawback #1: For the map sizes and gameplay, I honestly don't care what the game are supposed to be. All that matters is what they actually are. As I said before, I do like that players have to rely on there skill with a gun to achieve victory, rather than firing explosives from a tank, or firing missiles from a jet. And besides that, Call of Duty does still have the other elements of war through the killstreak/scorestreak systems. AC-130's, assault drones, helicopters, and UAVs/Counter UAVs to name a few. The biggest difference between CoD and Battlefield here is that in CoD, you're rewarded for skillful play with these powerhouse weapons or tactical support. In Battlefield, you can jump in a jet right when you spawn, attack with it until you die, and then wait at the spawnpoint until another one appears. It requires no skill, and I simply don't like that. (Yes, I know, not everybody does this, but I've seen plenty of people do it)As for the spawning, it seems you misunderstood me. I didn't mean dying because you picked a bad time to spawn on a teammate. The problem I had (it's very possible this has since been patched) is that when someone spawns on a teammate, they sometimes spawn behind the players they are trying to kill, rather than right next to the teammate. Enemies magically appearing behind you and killing you gets extremely annoying, quickly.I admit, this MIGHT happen in CoD, but if it does, it's generally because you're team isn't working together, and you're all spread out over the map.Drawback #2: I never said CoD gives you more tactical advantages. Neither game gives you ANY tactical advantages, as no matter which game you're playing, anything your team can do, the enemy team can also do.Of course, not all players blow things up as a primary tactic, but there are still plenty more than I'd like who do, as expert players are certainly not the majority.Gameplay: I wasn't saying CoD has superior gameplay because of those modes. I was simply saying that Battlefield isn't the only one of the two that has multiple modes, and fosters co-operative play. I just prefer the faster paced combat that, in my experience, CoD provides better than Battlefield.Weapons: I'm not sure if your list of weapons is all from one specific battlefield game, or multiple ones. If it's from a single game, while variety is great, 70-some guns seems a little excessive. If it's from multiple games, then I'm not sure why you think that's so much better than CoD.Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 has 38 guns in total between primaries and sidearms. They are plenty varied, and that's not including the wide array of attachments you can put on the guns, lethal/tactical equipment, or the many different perks you can use to make custom classes that play the way you want them to.Black Ops 2 also takes the class customization to a whole new level with it's pick 10 system. Basically, you have ten points to use, and any guns, attachments, perks, and equipment you want to use each take a point. For example, you can run two primary guns, each with 3 attachments, and take no perks or equipment if you want. Or, you can take six perks and hatchet, and nothing else, and use whatever weapons you find on people you take out. In my opinion, it's an amazing system that takes player preferences into account to an impressive degree.