Shapeshifting Reptilians

Yes, human brains are made up of three parts, however the Reptilian brain is not one of those three parts, as the three parts that make up the brain are the forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain. The brain is widely believed to have evolved from chordates and arthropods - between 570 and 555 million years ago, and its general architecture is shared with the most elementary animals such as insects. Anyway, the Reptilian brain, is actually correctly known as the Triune brain which was proposed by an American physician and neuroscientist Paul D. MacLean, drawing on comparative neuroanatomical work done by Ludwig Edinger, Elizabeth C. Crosby and C. J. Herrick early in the twentieth century.. MacLean originally formulated his model in the 1960s and propounded it at length in his 1990 book The Triune Brain in Evolution. However, this hypothesis is no longer espoused by the majority of comparative neuroscientists in the post-2000 era. The hypothesis became familiar to a broad popular audience through Carl Sagan's Pulitzer prize winning 1977 book The Dragons of Eden, and today it is espoused by the likes of David Icke, who uses is at part of his evidence to prove his reptilian shapeshifters, and with Carl Sagan being a major figure in the Salem one world new-age religious movement, we can clearly see that the hypothesis is getting continued by booksellers and Charlatans in order to suit Religious ideologies and to make money. They choose to build a religion based upon one Scientific theory, fail to accept it is just a theory, document it like it is fact, and yet fail to accept the findings of the Scientific community when they debunk those theories stating that the Triune brain actually exist in amphibians and fish as well as mammals and sauropsids. Because the basal ganglia are found in the forebrains of all modern vertebrates, they most likely date to the common evolutionary ancestor of the vertebrates, more than 500 million years ago, rather than to the origin of reptiles. Also, although it is wrong to say that the Triune brain is linked to structures related to territoriality, ritual behavior and other "reptile" behaviors, as birds also share this part of the brain, Birds have been shown to possess highly sophisticated cognitive abilities, such as the toolmaking of the New Caledonian crow and the language-like categorization abilities of the African grey parrot and they have a trait of parental care of offspring, which is highly evolved behaviour. Now, moving onto your argument regarding the fetus. To begin with, the fetus stage does not even begin until the ninth week of pregnancy. Before this, it is at the embryonic stages. And i really do not see how just because something may look reptilian like, that this is definite proof that we are part Reptoid. This sounds like the kind of argument would be put forward by a Charlatan just trying to find any old simile he can pass as evidence in order to continue selling sensationalized information. It is actually not even psuedo science, it is anti science. And anyway, before even the embryonic stage, the seed is kept inside the testicle and looks more like tadpoles or maggots, so if i base my hypothesis solely on looks, then i guess i would have to say that we are maggotoids. Ok, now onto your points about reptilian shapeshifters. Firstly, there are secret societies, that is a fact. Among them, are the freemasons, speculative society ect We even have some people say that there is an illuminati, however i personally think they are mistaken for the Crown, and a Camarilla, as the bavarian illuminati was outlawed by a Royal named Charles Theodore, and there is absolutely no proof that the Illuminati continued beyond this point as a neferious global network that manipulates mankind from Nibiru, and has done since Alalu departed on a journey to find monotomic gold, stumbling upon earth in his Chariot of fire, and then creating the cabals of cain, the olympians, the illuminari of Atlantis, all leading up to the babylonian brotherhood. There is a difference between what is factual and provable, and therefor acceptable, and what is mythological, unprovable, and therefor only acceptable as a belief, but unacceptable as a fact, and by the fact that today, we do have secret societies, and yes, we even have a church of Satan, founded by Anton Lavey, which is very closely tied to Scientology which likes to try find psuedo scientific facts to back their Satanic beliefs, However where is the actual proof for their religious beliefs? In the old testament? In earlier writings such as the Sumerian tablets or the Emeralds? I personally am not saying that god and satan do exist or dont, i personally take a uniterian stance, and accept all beliefs as beliefs, and am not irreligious, despite being unreligious, but what does my POV matter? it is just a POV. As are the POV's of preachers and new-age gurus's that try to feed us their beliefs like they are facts, and they are not, they are merely beliefs, and there is no hard evidence for god nor satan. Also to say that the Anunnaki are keeping us from realising gods teachings, thus keeping us slaves and monotomic gold diggers confusing us with the curse of babel, which sounds a little bit like the opinions of the born again seventh day adventist and ex elite Satanic cultist/Golden dawn member Roger Morneau from a trip into the supernatural, who believes that he witnessed all kinds of channeling of Satan and espouses that the entire evolution theory is a hoax perpertrated by Scientologists at the guidance and instruction of high priests channeling Satan himself and thus creating the evolution hoax in order to prevent us from believing in god. However, this is nonsense, as the evolution theory neither confirms the existence of an intelligent designer nor debunks it. There is no proof that anything is simply able to spontaneously appear, and logic would reason that everything requires creating. The only thing it does is perhaps blows a hole in certain religious beliefs, and their biblical fallices that has given religious institutions and churches a billion pound industry and has seen shems such as the pope in the vatican very powerful people, so of course, they dont always want to accept mainstream science when it could blow a hole in their more psuedo scientific claims that keep them in power. Now, you go onto mention the garden of eden and how it symbolises the reptilian brain. I would first just like to congratulate you on solving one of the age old mysteries and finally being able to confirm to everyone the true story regarding the garden of eden. However, there is no one theory for the true meaning behind the story of the garden of eden. Each individual theory and explanation holds equal compelling evidence. As does the kundalini explanation, as does the forbidden fruit being a magic mushroom/LSD, as does Jesus Christ himself being actually an LSD Cult, then there is the magic mushroom cult of Santa Claus, which all originates from the belief that the forbidden fruit in the garden of eden eaten by eve was LSD. As does the translations of the Sumerian tablets that would suggest that Adam and Eve where actually Adamu and Ti-Amen (Ti-Amet, cant remember which) and where genetically modified by Enki, and their forbidden fruit might have been their nakedness, and there is a whole host of other remarkable and equally compelling theories that i know of, and i have a few theories of my own, but there is nothing which can be passed off as hard fact and everything is at the debatable stages and still being researched, with nothing conclusive coming from it. One of the most compelling pieces of evidence of ancient intelligence comes from the word YAH, itself, as YAH translates as our basic genetic code, and is symbolised by snakes making the letter 8. However, this is not proof in anyway shape or form for us being Reptoids, but it may suggest that there was ancient intelligence, which i am not against, as we just have to look at the universe and reality as a whole to know that an incredible intelligence exists, but again, this does not prove a reptoid theory. On the otherhand, the exclamation to god being so similar to our genetic code, could just be a coincidence. Do coincidences like this happen? of course they do, and we help create those coincidences by they way we percieve them. Oh, and before i forget, Satan, as you say, being depicted as a snake throughout history, is not quite true. Satan, known as the Devil in Christian folklore, has many fronts, and at his roots he is an angel of light, a jinn. Snakes in ancient Egypt where used as symbols to depict evil, and i would not say that this became a symbol of evil because the ancients knew about reptilian shapeshifters, but possibally because they knew about the poison of snakes and how quickly they can kill, and thus, evil. As for the rest of your post, i put it to the jury that this is simply your POV, or the POV of a guru or cult, and that you nor they have any evidence for any of the religious claims that you go into great detail explaining. How you or anyone could ever know this is almost impossible, is dependent upon a mixture of belief and imagination, and at the core, the evidence for any of this comes down to cave drawings, and believing that ancient mythologies where anything more than just theories and stories. You believe that they where allegories for real events, yet if you are to believe ancient mythologies are based upon real events, then you must believe that Horus was cut into a thousand pieces and sowed back together by Anubis with fresh air breathed into his lungs to bring him back to life again. Or perhaps you believe it was an allegory? an allegory for what exactly? i put it to you, that it was a story, a legend, a myth, a belief!