This House Believes that God Does Not Exist! (Troll Debate)

Introduction Typical theist, denying both logic and science. Obviously if he had any respect for either of them he wouldn’t be a theist after all. Anyways, I will now waste my valuable and precious time refute this numbskull’s poor arguments and rebuttals Argument from Produce What that mustached man is mistaken about is that even though bannanas may fit in your hand well (thank you evolution), bananas are also tools for evil according to your fairy tale Bible! First off, they teach young girls to be naughty, which is obviously against the will of your god. This obviously leads to teenage pregnancies, sex before marriage, and all of your other dumb rules! Not only that, but according to a study conducted by bannanafacts.com, bananas on average kill 157 people every year. No loving god would create such a dangerous fruit! In fact, look at these black market banana guns with a range of 1200 yards! Bannanas are deadly weapons, and certainly do not point to the existence of a god. And how the hell does that video explain the pineapple? The pineapple is large, bulky, and spiky in addition to be difficult to get open. I call this video an example of cherry (punz) picking. Argument from Literature Attack on Premise 2 First off, god did not write the Bible. There is no evidence that a big man with a white beard on a cloud sat down with a pencil and paper then sent it down from the sky down to Earth. No, it is quite clear that humans wrote the Bible. After all, god doesn’t exist so who else could have written the Bible? Humans are dumb and flawed human beings (I’m looking at you Bieber), and obviously the bible must therefore be a story book just like Harry Potter and the Hunger Games. And if god did exist, then Satan obviously who have tempted the human beings into writing lies, and therefore any argument based off the Bible proving god’s existence are necessarily false. Attack on Premise 3 God murderd a bunch of cute and innocent babies. Yet Justin Bieber has not been destroyed. ‘Nuf said. Problem of Justin Bieber Here Zaradi defends a KKK, Nazi, woman hating, music destroying, douchbag. I think we can consider y argument conceded. His angelic voice only serves to brainwash his cult members. Obviously Zaradi has been mesmerized and has therefore too become part of his cult. We wish you well Zaradi. My opponent’s second (failed) rebuttal simply doesn’t make sense. As mentioned before, god will massacre a bunch of innocent babies Yet not destroy Justin Bieber? The fact that Justin Bieber is still alive is a testament to god not existing! God won’t even protect babies then why would god protect Justin Bieber? The argument implies godi s a malevolent being, but this contradicts the definition of god set forth in round 1! Argument from Richard Dawkins Zaradi concedes that Richard Dawkins is a smart man because he wears glasses. It simply follows then that sense smart people write about the truth, and Dawkins argues against god’s existence, then god therefore does not exist. And please, theists don’t believe in science! If they did they wouldn’t believe in god obviously! Nonono, if god exists, then the universe was made in 6 days, the Flood was a real event, evolution is false, Adam and Eve were two real people, ect .ect. God is obviously incompatible with science! Argument from Formal Logic As I suspected, my irrefutable argument stands strong. Zaradi’s argument basically follows: P1. Logic is stupid. P2. But I used logic on my other arguments anyways. C1. Therefore I am stupid. So Zaradi is basically calling himself stupid while conceding the argument. And by the way Zaradi, ice cream and logic are still compatible. P1. Humans should be happy. P2. Icecream makes humans happy. C1. Therefore humans should eat icecream. Zaradi my dear ignorant theist, logic is a promoter of happiness, not an enemy of it!