abortion

So, I'm going to make a few rebuttals against your post here, and maybe add a few others things. "The problem with this is it's being justified when it's an obviously wrong thing. You can ask almost anybody if murdering a random person on the side of the road is right or wrong. That person has done nothing wrong. Just a random person minding their own business. That can be compared to the innocent child. Never done anything wrong, yet not able to ever experience the joys of life because someone may feel they're not ready to take care of that child. People keep trying to justify an obviously evil thing. What abortion is is murder. Nothing less. People can argue all they want about bettering the mother or the baby, but what it comes down to is that abortion is the murdering an unborn fetus." So... To argue against this. First off, that's an extreme comparison, more so than the veggie like state comparison that I made. Secondly, who's to say killing is morally wrong? (This is an entirely different debate, nor will I debate the response back to this if given one). I will debate the right or wrong of the abortion of a child tho. Sure, the baby has done nothing wrong, it couldn't do anything wrong, no one can deny that, but like george carlin said "not every ejaculation deserves a name". I mean, are we going to restrict masturbation and impose such laws cause after all, you are killing potential children that could be created, children that could grow up and become doctors, and develop cures? I mean, we are given the free choice to make decisions. Abortion again is currently a free choice, and as for it being morally wrong, sometimes it's the right thing to do like taken a terminally ill family member off life support. AGAIN, I'm not saying every baby is going to come out a bad apple, or a genetic freak with diseases, but I would again say the chances aren't good in those type of cases. "The definition of murder is the unlawful killing of a human being by another and the definition of human being is; a man, woman, or child of the species Homo sapiens, distinguished from other animals by superior mental development." Technically, by default of that definition, you are not murdering when you go in for abortion. If that was the case, abortion would be outlawed, and illegal. I don't even think the infants themselves have brains yet (I'm unsure, but there is certain restrictions on if it's too late to get abortions, and I think they do them before the brain form, so correct me if I'm wrong). So, the fetus is essentially a potential-human being not yet developed. The fetus does not have personhood, therefore abortion certainly IS NOT MURDER (and most abortions are done before such major developments and growths). Now, to go back to the female, she shouldn't have to be restricted and carry the burden regardless of her choice, and be forced to carry an unwanted baby. How would you feel if someone wanted you to constantly carry over 100 pounds of equipment daily or make you do something you don't want to do? The female is the least concern out of the protesters and the baby. Again, once the baby is out of the womb, and enters the world, people stop caring, and no longer give a damn. It's all on the mother to nurse him, or send him off for adoption or whatever. By the way... Most women don't report rape and admit to rape, the percentage is a lot higher than what's given. We shouldn't take steps back as a country, and have abortion illegal. I mean, it's always restricting the rights of the people. That's about all I'm going to say currently for this post.