public health concerns justify compulsory immunizations

i am looking for an LD debate so if you could pls format it as such. i appreciate anyone taking this debate, i really need critiques on my case as of now my coach is insanely busy. "In order to control the future one must control the present. How can one control the present? By controlling the past. Control the past and you control the present and the future. Freedom is the ability to say two plus to equals four. Should one control the past two plus two equals five." To avoid this example of Orwell's control of society I stand to negate the resolution: public health concerns justify compulsory immunizations. To clarify the round I offer the following observations 1: Though medical personal and or institutions give immunizations, they are paid for by governmental agencies and therefore controlled by those governmental agencies. 2: Being controlled by governmental agencies, allows them to make any decision on where these immunizations are allocated and how they are used. Because I support the freedom to say two plus two equals four I value individual liberty. We must look at liberty for a few reasons: First, Individual Liberty is the basis of all free societies: the founding premise of all free and just societies is individual liberty, where the state exists to protect the inalienable rights of the individuals that compose society. Next Individual Liberty ensures the protection of other rights: Only through individual liberty can individuals be ensure their due rights. Without guaranteed protection for individual liberty, all rights go by the wayside for other lesser values, and last, Individual Liberty is key to quality of life: Without access to the guaranteed and inalienable freedoms, individuals can never attain a genuine quality of life. Now, to fulfill individual liberty I offer the value criterion of upholding LOCKE'S SOCIAL CONTRACT. According to Locke's Second Treatise of Civil Government: Freedom of Men under Government is, to have a standing Rule to live by, common to every one of that Society, and made by the Legislative Power erected in it; a Liberty to follow my own Will in all things, where the Rule prescribes not; and not to be subject to the inconstant, uncertain, unknown, Arbitrary Will of another Man: as Freedom of Nature is, to be under no other restraint but the Law of Nature. Locke emphasizes the importance of personal property and freedom to do with that property what the owner pleases. No property is more personal and more essential than ones own body. Without freedom and control over one's body, one can never attain true individual liberty or freedom. The role of government in Locke's social contract is to protect individual liberty. The government therefore should not mandate individuals take certain actions with regard to their own property. I contend that the US government uses language alteration to manipulate the way people feel. George Orwell in 1984 explains that a party can control the ways in which people feel and act through the use of language alteration. Mark Moyers explains VOLUNTARYIST, "Philosophy of Immunization", 12.1992, accessed 10.10.2009: http://www.voluntaryist.com...... By the time that the year 1984 came and went, the powers that be had convinced the "masses" that George Orwell's prediction of "Big Brother" had been nothing but fantasy. Orwell had said that the State would control people by controlling their thoughts-by way of language destruction, language pollution, and word-meaning reversals. Orwell painted the future with definition changes such as "Ignorance is strength," and "Freedom is slavery." I don't believe he ever focused on the contradictions inherent in compulsory immunization, so I would like to do so now. The word "immunization" is used to describe an injection of a substance, which is intended to make a person free from the necessity of fighting a disease. "Immune" was borrowed by the scientific community from the political community. A Latin word derived some 4000 years ago, immune meant "free from obligation or duty to the city or public". "Immune" was a political word used to describe a particular status of an individual. When the scientific community began to use it, it had a similar basis with regard to disease, yet no thought of a political reference was apparent. Within a hundred years after the development of immunizations, they became compulsory (as a matter of law) for all children attending public schools. Here was "compulsory freedom" long before Orwell ever thought of mind control. The original meaning of the word meant free from the obligation of duty to the city or public. Now it means something completely different. The government manipulated the meaning of this word to alter out thoughts on it. The government here has denied our individual liberty even if unintentionally this way. By not giving us our individual liberty they have effectively told us what to do with our property or bodies as the case may be. So overall a language alteration denies us individual liberty by controlling the way we see certain things. So two plus two equals five. Secondly I contend the use of language to manipulate people is unjust There are a few words that the media uses to manipulate the thoughts on immunizations and viruses. Here is a short list: chronic, cure, violent, and grow. Here are even a few article titles from natural health news.com: Vaccine Revolt! Swine flu vaccine support crumbles as flimsy rational becomes apparent, and Traditional Plant Medicine Could Cure H1N1 Flu Virus, Chinese Scientists Find. Here are a few facts; viruses cannot be cured; only treated. Second, the average US citizen reads on a sixth grade reading level as according to informatics review.org. And because of this low level of comprehension the media intentionally takes advantage of people to sway opinions in one way or another. This is stripping one of individual liberty and inappropriate in a society as according to John Locke because the media is intentionally manipulating our opinions to receive immunizations or not. In conclusion, a government manipulating its people through the alteration of language is denying individual liberty because whoever is in control is implicitly telling us what to do with our bodies. By controlling this aspect, a society can be manipulated to believe virtually anything; even something as obscure as two plus two equals five. So to avoid this fact I urge the negative ballot.