Sarah Palin's supreme disqualification should be alarming, persuading people to vote against GOP.

"My opponent insists on debating a point which is not debatable. A 2/3 vote is needed to get an impeachment. Here is a an excerpt from wikipedia.com (http://en.wikipedia.org......):" Yes, but my opponent assumes that ONLY the Democrats will vote for conviction. There are plenty of moderate Republicans in the Senate. "Also 'veto proof' is a 2/3 majority in the senate." I know. I said they don't need a veto-proof majority, because they can't be vetoed in impeachment convictions. "my opponent claims that McCain knows Palin is incompetent. To this I say, 'Huh?'. If McCain knows Palin is incompetent but still willing to have her elected to VP, he is not 'Putting Country First'. This behavior is grossly immoral and unethical. It shows that McCain is willing to put America at risk to win an election. If McCain really thought this way, this is what he would be saying: 'Vote for me for President. Ignore Sarah Palin, I know she's incompetent thats why I plan to fire her after i get into office.' That argument does not help prove his point." He may not have known when he chose her, but now it is more than clear that she is incompetent. He can't say so now, or else he won't win. He can fire afterwords, easily, but that can't be done now. "The list goes on to about six. But notice how the (a.) in my opponents version differs from the (a.) posted on the Alaska Government website." No, you didn't pay close enough attention. Then (a.) I listed was separate from the rest of the quote. The (a.) was from the definition of Ethics violations. Below it I listed the penalties. "This investigation is simply that, an investigation. It holds not legal weight. It is just formal evidence. Now the 'Personnel Panel', which are personally selected by the Governor, will review the investigation and decide whether or not to further action is needed. Now it is unlikely the 'Personnel Panel' will conduct a review anytime soon, especially not before election day. So my opponent is wrong. Palin can not be impeached from office as a result of this investigation. Which is why it is important to not vote GOP and keep Palin far away from National Office." She can be convicted after election day. She can be impeached. "This belief is simplifying the impact of voting. Companies conduct hundreds of polls and crunch countless of pieces of data in order to better understand what causes voters to vote one way as opposed to another. Current polls already suggest that Palin is having a negative impact on the GOP ticket. People are becoming more and more turned off by her. The votes need to support this trend. The vote count is what all the analysts and strategists will come back to in order to reference their findings. It will tell them how much of an impact a candidate like Palin will have on an election. If we vote down GOP because of Palin they will know that other candidates like Palin will result in a lost election." That may be true, but it is already obvious that incompetent VP candidates won't work unless the candidate for President is any good. This won't change anything. "I can see it now, Palin pushing to get a display from a creationist museum, depicting Man riding on Dinosaurs, put into the Smithsonian Institution. Or trying to convince NASA that the Universe is not billions of years old, its 4,000 years old. Despite these informal roles, VP should be a close advisor and confidant for the President. Historically that has been their main role. Palin can't be that person for McCain." McCain is not stupid, he won't give her these roles.