The god of the bible would never be dumb enough to ever text as a form of communication to god

If my tone is condescending, Oh well it how I talk. And I"m not going to change for you or anyone. If you don"t like my praise towards you, That"s entirely your problem. "It's hard to understand most of your argument because the sentence structure and capitalization is all over the place, " Now I don"t get why my argument has capitalizations all over the place, But it seem like after ANYONE uses a comma, Right after that comma there are now capital letters. Go figure. Also debate. Org has completely done away with anybody and everybody using youtube videos as any kind of a link. When somebody saves it to their arguments or posts, The codes to the videos are somehow altered so that the videos become worthless. As far as someone using links, Well if you notice, Those generally don"t work either as when saved to arguments or posts they are separated from their structure so the only way that they can be used is if someone were to copy and paste those links into google or yahoo or wherever. Its like debate. Org has spat on its users who want to use outside information as evidence to help support their case rather than having that person type out 50, 000 characters, A complete and useless way of running things because NO ONE processes that information in comparison to watching a 10 or even 20 minute video. I personally have very bad hands and cannot type much, And may one day say f--k it. Regardless, To nearly 100% of everyone I debate with, I am the teacher, Just like to nearly everyone who makes the attempts to debate with me, They think they are the teacher. That"s---what---a---debate---is. However, Usually and I"d say a good 90% of the time or more, When someone tries to debate with me they invent these excuses form something in which they clearly know nothing about for a subject in which they profess to having knowledge upon and they really don"t. And since they don"t they have to pretend that they do and thus invent excuses for it. BAD IDEA. Especially for someone who knows better. And believe me, I do know better, A lot better. These people are so ridiculously easy to spot. And many, If not most also have no genuine friends or loved ones in which is a HUGE red flag. PrimeministerJoshua812 is absolutely 100% guilty of this. Not only that but he"s been caught of flat out lying. He knows it. I truly hate that. Did you read at all past the line where I said the only other alternative was divine signs every time he wanted to communicate? I did but perhaps what you don"t get is that it wasn"t needed nor was it required. "You can't prove anything exists. " Sure you can through mathematical equations. They after all are the only facts that there are. 2 + 2 = 4 no matter which language you speak. God (and I always use that name with a small "g" yet now everty single time that I type that thing"s name it gets capitalized. Wow what a gross disconfigurization. ) no matter which language you speak can always be disproved. Not only that but according to Stephen Hawking (perhaps the smartest person who has ever lived) and his colleague, They have come up with and equation showing that something does come from nothing. In other words, God was not needed to have created the known universe. "Isn't this supposed to be a hypothetical argument? " You don"t get that its not an argument. I laid down my sword. "It's about whether he MIGHT use it, " Well you nor anyone can think of any reason, Not one, Why god would ---ever--- use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible. Alright I guess you want more reasons as to why this god of YOURS would ---never--- use text as a form of communication. Wow. NOTHING is established in scripture so everybody can get it wrong as there"s been 0 updates in at least 2, 000 years. There"s translations upon translations upon translations upon translations upon copies upon copies upon copies upon copies upon dead languages upon dead langanguages with absolutely 0% of a chance to trace it back to the original. And there"s no original in the first place! So absolutely nobody is interpreting correctly. And within those translations and copies throughout the generations, Characters and what they have said, Especially with its leading characters, Namely god and christ, Their quotes/ verses have changed over time. Oh really? Who has the right and or knowhow to change ANY of god"s language to update it to whatever they felt like and or to amputate it into ---their--- language? Did they consulte god and or jesus to see if this was OK? Of course not. And more importantly did they get it right as an updated version to what these characters would say in this day and age, Or even back then when the translations were updated? 100% certainly not. So once again god if as stated was reasonably intelligent would ---never--- use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible because he would have certainly have foreseen all of these major faults. * In the Bishop"s bible, The one before the KJV, The word "Tyrant" was used I don"t know how many times and then in the KJV that was replaced by "King". WHAT? Tyrant and KIng are two different and totally apples and oranges with each having totally different meanings. * In Isaiah 45:7 KJV "I form the light, And create darkness: I make peace, And create evil: I the Lord do all these things. " In the NIV version its "I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, The Lord, Do all these things. " The words "evil" and "disaster" are completely 2 different things and words and have 0% of anything to do with each other and completely change the meaning. * Even worse who is the arrogant a$$ that changed what his god had said and it happens constantly throughout the bible? Now since these changes are made it means that if it happens once, It going to happen twice and if its going to happen twice its going to happen four times which means its going to happen eight times which means its going to happen sixteen times which means its going to happen thirty-two times and on and on, Thus meaning that whatever version is read is a convoluted mess, Because after all there"s no original version to compare any version to. And even if there was an original, What idiot is going to interpret so that ALL, Each and every person on earth is going to understand it? Text is the worst form of communication to god, And of god is even remotely intelligent, In which he is clearly not, He would have foreseen though all of this bile and corrected it and simply not used text with all the mistakes that abound. JG 1:19 "And the Lord was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, Because they had chariots of iron. " (tee hee THAT'S REALLY way beyond silly. So this is how I will defeat/ set up a defense against your god is if I have iron chariots. And all the nuclear bombs on earth and all the supernovas and all gamma ray bursts IN THE UNIVERSE EVER will not be a defense and not be able to defeat god, But alas, According to the schizophrenic of unsound mind in whoever wrote the damn thing bible *take a breath please* iron chariots will. Again this is proof as to why your god would never rely on text as as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible because of utterly silly verses like these that DO PROVE your god is NOT omnipotent and yet YOU in being the uttery imbecile that you are, In continually being proven wrong, You still search for truth in your bible. Now why is that when you haven"t proven one god damned thing? ) * GE 18:20-21 God decides to "go down" to see what is going on. "20 And the Lord said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, And because their sin is very grievous; 21 I will go down now, And see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, Which is come unto me; and if not, I will know. " (Since god didn't know what was going on according to VS 21, It means he's imperfect and not omnipotent which is yet another reason why this god of yours would ---never--- rely on text as a source of communication, The worst form of communication possible. Especially to prove himself false) "The only information I have is that god is supposed to be perfectly powerful, Smart, And good, And that god is supposed to have created everything. If god is perfectly powerful and smart, " Then wow to a 0% of nothing, You know nothing about this supposed god. Thank god. If you were to even have read the smallest amount of the bible you would find out the exact opposite. I'm sure you know about the great flood - correct? The deliberate genocide of every single living thing except for two of everything. This wonderful god murdered babies, Children and pregnant mothers. He would have had to. He drowned and suffocated them. Babies still suckling on their mothers nipples. I mean I can show you A LOT more if you want. "He can find or MAKE a way to use text as good communication. " To who? And then you have to ask why? Especially if" "Unless he wanted to give a sign from above to people every time he wanted them to understand something. " With text you get pages torn, Languages that die out, Copies upon copies, Translations upon translations, Generation gaps unfulfilled, Instructions that people did no get from god - unless they were perfect - well the bible isn"t perfect. In fact its far from it. We"ve seen that. Etc etc etc So this god character, Do you really think for a trillionth of a second he"d EVER want to use text to spread his word unless he"s a complete dick and likes to spread false information and play children"s games? Now which do you think would be better? That's why I stopped after your first sentence. The answer is point blank obvious. I"m out of space. And I still haven't covered everything as to why god would ---never--- use text.