There's too much hate in God

Metric no matter how you word it is still metric. Hate is hate is hate no matter how you look at at it in your cannibalistic warfare that you consider "good" I"m guessing. When you sink to the level of cannibalizing children, murdering them, massacring them, brutalizing them through deliberate genocides that were absolutely needless yet done anyway and were nothing but pure hate and evil as described in the bible and many times as god"s hissy fits then there"s absolutely no such a thing, nothing, 0 as "too much hate". Its simply doesn"t exist. Its goes leaps and bounds beyond too much hate. Been thinking about this and I really don"t need nor require to think much. But my opponent has failed to to prove how god is not pure hate after I proved to her in my previous argument that god truly hates children. She has stated that what I have provided to her as evidence are idol verses and she obviously believes that the children should be murdered and that her god should cause the children undenying pain and suffering because of this. I would like her to point out any verse that shows this. I would like her to show any child that shows this. Regardless, if she points this out to be true, does any child deserve to be put through the horrific tortures and sufferings and pain that the bible clearly describes that her god put these children through? That answer is a very obvious "no" However, she thinks that answer is an obvious "yes". So what is wrong with her morals? So this ties in with her "that means that sins against him are the greatest sins one can commit. In a vast majority of my opponent's examples, the people who were punished by death were the ones committing sins directly against God such as idolatry and the destruction of God's image (themselves)." Absolutely 100% false. 1. My opponent clearly has not read the verses. 2. The people in the verses who were being punished were children, so how were they committing "sins" against god? 3. Does that happen today? No it does not. Why not? 4. I want you to come on down here right now and murder me as your bible perfectly describes in Deuteronomy 13: 9-10 because I am committing sins against your god. But you are not going to do it. Why not? 5. Since you won"t, this proves you to be a coward and you cannot live by your god"s laws and rules and regulations. So that means that at the very least your god has banned you. I get it. I really do. Her morals are with her god that is her child were to curse at her, her child should be put to death as per what her bible and god prescribes. Now if that isn"t god truly hating children, then what is? My opponent thinks this god of hers had to forcibly order, when many of them were proven whimsical at best and for no reason at all, the deaths of 2,821,364 in her bible and that they are all justified including that of children and those babies that were suckling on their mothers breasts. "We can agree that some level of hate is good." No we can"t. "A just God"" whoa. Who ever said and or assumed that god was in any way "just"? How can he possibly be when he murders and causes the innocent deaths and murders and the evils sufferings of children? He obviously enjoys this hatred and evil as well. Otherwise he would not continue in this manner. continuing "who does not hate evil is a logical paradox." No its not. Its completely illogical. Hatred is illogical. God---invented---evil. So no he doesn"t hate evil at all. He relishes in it. Tracie Harris "If I could stop a person from raping a child, I would. That"s the difference between me and your god. He watches and shuts the door and you go ahead and you rape that child and when your"re done I"m gonna punish you. If I did that people would think I"m a freakin" monster." Yes, morally good. Get rid of god for starters. That sounds like a very good plan to me. "god has never communicated any essential scientific knowledge" "god has not communicated any essential moral knowledge." "god has never even communicated any consistent religious knowledge. (despite claims going on for over 40,000 years)" "These 3 facts are exactly what you"d would expect if there are no gods. But none at all if you expect there are gods." Richard Carrier Free Will: Its a losing proposition that you can"t win. If you believe in god you do not have free will of any kind. Period. Let's look at it from god's point of view because god himself does NOT have free will IF he knows his future. After all, how can he if he is omnipotent because he will have already known his choices that have been chosen? That is NOT Free Will. So if YOUR god does not have Free Will and the ability to choose, most definitely man does NOT have Free Will and the ability to choose. Also you---show---me---anywhere, and I do mean anywhere, in his bible where it says something remotely like "I the LORD thy god grants man free will." The fact of the matter is, is that it doesn't exist. Not anywhere. Not even a remote hint. So god has not granted you Free Will. Also there's free will in hate? That's makes no sense whatsoever if this god guy is supposed to be loving, caring and kind. Wow what a true contradiction if there ever was one. But then again, god and the bible are riddled with thousands of contradictions which proves 0 intelligence. If this god guy of yours is omnipotent and cares, with kindness, and love in which there's no way he can because this god guy can easily take the evil and hate out of Free Will such as the brutal rape, beating and torturing of a 6 year old girl as an example. But no, he doesn't. He leaves it in. Thus that absolutely proves that this god of your IS EVIL(and he freely admits it several times is HIS bible as proved. . My opponent thinks that there is truth. But there is no truth in faith. My opponent believes that god is good. But she has yet to prove that god exists. My opponent insists that everybody should believe as she does which declares war on others (though not on me) and she should be extra careful when talking about religion around others, she believes that there is a creator to the universe without proof at all to this unscientific meandering. Stephen Hawking perhaps the smartest person who has ever lived has come up with a mathematical equation that proves that something is gotten from nothing. In other words your god was not needed to have created the known universe. If man is created in god"s image, then god must be Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Hong Xiuquan, every serial killer, rapist, sodomizer, torturer, racist etc Here"s the thing that my opponent doesn"t get" Good and evil don"t mix. Not ever. Here"s why" What would you do with someone who has raped and murdered 6 five year old girls and there"s a 100% certainty that this was the person and you had him in custody? You can"t let him free not ever. So you give him the chair. But wait, my opponent is being a christian would forgive this person and set him free because the biggest sin is to have false idols. Naturally this proves her to be quite insane. Well um no. Not ever do you let this person go. And you cannot do the same with god. God creates these murderers, these rapists, these lunatics, these Hitler"s, these Pol Pot"s, these Hong Xiuquans"s and he knows EXACTLY who they will turn out to be quadrillions of years in advance long before they are rockin" in the cradle. You do not forgive god. Not this time when he knowingly creates yet another murderer who shoots up his entire family of 6. Its time that this god be ousted. But then again he doesn"t exist. Summary My opponent didn"t, as predicted, and was very christian-like, did not in any way think about my previous argument of how much hate there is, and the pain and the suffering that children go through. She ignored the children completely just as I knew she would. Its the children that matter, the children who are exploited and treated like scum. Not her god. Not the adults. Not anything else.