Obama is murdering and terrorizing men women and children in Afghanistan

My opponent's entire argument is based on a chip on his shoulder, and a grudge he is holding against what he terms "the Democratic party", and "their" criticism of Bush. Indeed there were many members of the Democratic party who criticized Bush's handling of the war, but there was no combined effort to label Bush a murderer and terrorist. That would have resulted in articles of impeachment and a formal accusation of murder and terrorism by the Democratic party. This never happened. My opponent would not only have to prove that Bush was accused en masse of being a murderer and terrorist by some official body who's declaration would have some legal value, but he would subsequently have to prove that Obama has committed the same crimes. My opponent has not even attempted to do either. "What my personal beliefs are or what I would do is irrelevant."- That's not true. Your entire argument is based on what you supposedly believe of Obama. If you believe it is just to invade a country and annihilate their populations based on the actions of those "harbored" by the country, then you can't possibly believe a lesser controlled version of those same actions are murder and/or terrorism. It is your argument that Obama's actions amount to murder and terrorism, but it is also your belief that his actions are not only just, but lacking. This moral contradiction dismantles your moral argument. Point #1- You have not even attempted to prove this. I am sure if you bring about the official declarations of the Democratic party's views of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan they would not amount to labeling Bush a murderer and a terrorist- a pre-requisite for proving your argument that Obama is in the same boat. Furthermore, the Democratic party's opinion is irrelevant to this argument because you are not debating a Democrat who agrees with even an unofficial assessment. Point #2- Raids are not carried out on a case by case basis under orders of the President. You obviously lack understanding of military chain of command, rules of engagement, etc. By your assessment the entire military is full of murderers and terrorists as they all carry out the unlawful orders to murder and terrorize civilians in the form of following orders to carry out counter-terrorism raids. Point #3- It was you who brought up the legality issue, not me. Thanks for conceding the point that it is irrelevant. Point #4- You have expressed not only support for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, you have supported wider action in the entire Middle East. "If one takes the time or even bothers to look at war statistics, The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are the most successful wars ever fought in military history."- It's always interesting when debaters inject a little humor into their statements. I would love to see these magical statistics. "If Bush is a war criminal then Obama is a war criminal."- With this statement my opponent concedes the entire debate. Bush has not been accused or convicted of war crimes. Even if the reciprocity applied, a separate trial would have to be held to assess the actions of the Obama Administration which has just begun. No such investigation, trial, or judgment has been carried out on the Bush Administration, so by my opponent's reasoning- If Bush is NOT a war criminal, then neither is Obama.