Gay marriage is sinful.

Now let us move on to finishing this great debate. Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality My opponent moves off on an irrelivant tangent here by stating that Jesus doesn't condemn rape so that must means that he's okay with it. The answer is simply of course not, but that doesn't translate against homosexulaity. Jesus does speak and save a women from being stoned to death for Adultry in John 7:53-8:11. What I'm trying to say here is that Jesus nor the Bible never specifically states that it's wrong and gay marriage at that. What the Bible says. We agree here, but in order to fully understand the Bible one must have the background story. For example, one cannot fully understand how Hitler came to power without understanding World War 1. I am merely just showing the backstory and this sheads light on the Bible. Now to clarify the Plato argument. I stated that what the passage is talking about is like Plato's philosphy here on finding one's missing half. Kedoshim is just the missing half of the story in that Biblical passage. I know by now this part must be getting annoying, but let us observe this once again. Jesus states that this (there being man and women) will cause a man to leave his mother and father. Now let's jump to the end where it states "they twain shall be one flesh? " Now this portion means that together they are whole refuring to Eve Coming from Adam's Rib. This does not mean that all men have to find women, but this is to complete themselves and look for their missing half. Jesus was wanting people to be happy and find their other half. Not be forced to marry someone they don't like. Infertile Wives God told Adam and Eve to go forth and muliply, but that's because there was only two humans on Earth. If they didn't then none of us would be here and God's creation would have been in vain. Now there is a large surplus of people and many even believe that the world is overpopulated. Surely humanity has met God's request to multiply as we have mulitplied faster than bunny rabbits. Leviticus My opponent wants me to point out in Leviticus where this is mentioned, but though the Bible does not directly state Kedoshim it does indeed mention the Canaanite Pagan religion and condemns it. in Leviticus 18:21, "You shall not give any of your children to offer them to Molech, and so profane the name of your God: I am the Lord. " Now who is Molech, how are we to know without reserch and heavens no what could happen if we Google it? Well this is when reserch is necessary. Molech is the Canaanite Pagan God. He is believed to be the god of hell as he was an idol of fire. Which if we observe the link I gave you a few rounds back you can see this ties into Kedoshim and thus the Bible somewhat states it a little more clearly for my opponent here. As my opponent has said I'm completely following the scriptures by showing this evidence from Leviticus. Now here on the chalkboard portion my opponent has just stated something amazing, let's pull up that quote. "Maybe they are all sinful, maybe they're not" Here we can see that my opponent is going against the Bible by stating that somethings that are "banned" in Leviticus are not sinful. This is a huge concession by my opponent and means a ton of things in this debate. My opponent is looking at this wrong. We have to look at the Torah, the Old Testiment (what the Jewish call it) and it simply states not to lay on the same bed as evil and those who do preform evil and shall be put to death. This describes their religious rites and has nothing to do with homosexuality. Even if it did it would be refuring to the act of sex not gay marriage. So reguardless this contention goes to me. Biblical Support For my justification of using outside information in this debate and these sections in 2 Timothy 2:15, " Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. " This is done by reading the Bible and then reserching it's context. For example in an early instance how was I to know the Pagan god mentioned in the Bible without reserch and looking for context. That's what this portion of the Bible does and it's the fact that I have done said reserach and have shown what Peter was talking about proves that it is not condeming homosexuality. In conclusion, one can see that this debate goes to Con, because of the basis that the Bible never actually condemns Gay Marriage. I have disproved all attacks on homosexuality throughout the Bible by using context clues and reserch.