Creationism as truth should not be taught in schools (Contender: Con)

First of all, let me make one thing clear, you state Evolution has evidence And yet you provided NONE in the entirety of your debate … know why? Cause you can’t. Unfortunately Evolution remains theory not fact. One must be able to show evidence of its truth, not conjecture. All you have stated are imaginings of men. For example, for evolution to be accurate all must evolve, Evolution if accurate must be mandatory, and yet because it is inaccurate and false it does not hold true to its own paradigm. I give you the Coelacanth DINOFISH.com - COELACANTH: THE FISH OUT OF TIME COELACANTH; A prehistoric fish once thought to be extinct found living in modern times. All creatures remain exactly the same as their ancestors in shape form and fashion, with exception only in size. Example …. Crocodiles and alligators are not the same species, they resemble one another but are distinctly separate creatures. So too are those of the fossil record and it cannot be proven otherwise. Science thrust conjectures by the pantload, for species which resemble one another and try to convince you that they are the same species just evolved. Nope not true. How do we know this …. Charles Darwin said so Himself, and despite science’s claim to fame- Darwin’s statement remains as a haunting specter forever dooming evolution into the realm of fantasy and foolishness. Babies are immersed in amniotic fluid for 9 months- gill like structures does mean gills .... have you seen them? They do not look like gills they look like fat pads... yeech! And it certainly has nothing to do with them having been now or ever a fish. ***Note*** No evidence of gills So you see your giving us the proverbial Fish story (smile). https://www.google.com... Science guesses a lot but they continually have no proof, real photographic proof, just reports or like your failing to provide in this debate? Is there any actual evidence in our future? Darwin Admitted it is Absurd to Believe that the Eye Could have been Formed by Natural Selection: “To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.” ~ Charles Darwin-origin of the species Darwin Expected Innumerable Transitional Forms, but they Do not Exist Here is what I consider the most important excerpt of the book: “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”~ Charles Darwin-origin of the species Darwin Admitted that Events like The Cambrian Explosion would be Fatal to the Theory: Darwin says himself the lack of these fossils would be fatal to the theory: ~origin of the species If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life all at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory to descent with slow modification though natural selection. 1) There is no evidence for Noah's flood, neither is there enough water to drown the tallest mountain. Again you presume there were mountains .... were you there? were your scientist there? No, that's called conjecture. https://www.bing.com... https://www.bing.com... https://www.bing.com... https://www.bing.com... AS to the proof of global flood_ look at these trees buried UPRIGHT, when have you ever known a time trees just stand there as they are being buried? Landslide? Nope would have flattened them! Explosion? Nope flattened them, Water current piling silt over standing trees while under water? There ya go. As to the rest- again theories, not a fact in the bunch- but question, just as a matter of intellect, would you take adult animals or youth animals aboard the ark? 8) No fossils of humans with dinosaurs. In creation, humans coexisted with dinosaurs while there is not a single fossil of a human with a dinosaur. Dinosaur fossils are much deeper in the soil as they lived millions of years ago. https://www.bing.com... https://www.bing.com... https://www.bing.com... https://www.bing.com... https://www.bing.com... Interesting- how did you test the First Couple? No need just look for a bellybutton from the placenta! Cause you do know that reproduction only occurs through direct female to male contact and fertilization of the ovum (egg). Again unproven guesses, conjectures …. As I said produce a picture of a single living creature created by science without using and ovum by abiogenesis or lightning strikes, or bacteria that has become and animal or quit passing off evolution as facts, it was a lie before it is a huge lie still at this present date because there is no evidence of any report by scientist where a living breathing walking eating creature was born. Period. Now that credibility has been established for evolution over creation, Uhhh wrong and fairy tales are being taught in school it’s called evolution!