Pennington is NOT a genuine believer & Story book jebus was an eternal Jew!

Con wrote: Pro still maintains that I can not sin. He does this by posting scratches of verses into what he wants them to mean. Composer(Pro) responds: It is NOT ' I ' that maintains that!It is YOUR own chosen Story book that confirms and vindicates what I correctly stated -Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. (1 John 3:6) KJV Story bookLets reaffirm what this clearly and unambiguously states that is fatal to Cons arguments -Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not:Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not:Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not:Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not:Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not:&whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.Further more, Cons own preferred KJV Story book goes on to negatively identify Con further -He (e.g. Con) that committeth sin (See Cons admission above " so do I ") is of the devil; . . . . (1 John 3:8) KJV Story bookThat is as clear & unambiguously fatal to Cons claims and it all comes from Cons own preferred Story book!Con can continue to huff, puff & deny his own Story book, but that only belies the very Story book Con wanted us to believe that he believes & obeys?Con offers now instead a barrage of other claims & personal insults & attacks all in a vain effort to contradict those passages I presented that unambiguously refute him!Con wrote: Bottom line: Pros arguments and credibility have entirely failed. He dropped most of his argument already. Composer(Pro) responds: I have in fact taken each of my propositions in turn commencing with my having now proven Con is a jebus reject and is not a genuine believer.Con now turns his venom upon Pro and Con commences a barrage of personal insults in lieu of a shred of credibility for his (now defeated) cause!Con wrote: Obviously also now that Pro has been unambiguously exposed by his own lunacy & fraud?I Pro conversely maintain that it is hardly ' lunacy ' on my part, that I quote Cons own Story book testimony, that continually only legitimately decimates Cons various other claims also e.g. -Con wrote: " I do not need to sell all I have to be a Christian and follow it principles. "Oops! Sell that ye have, and give alms; . . . . (Luke 12:33) KJV Story book . . . . whoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, cannot be my disciple.(Luke 14:33) KJV Story book Re: Story book jebus is an eternal Jew! -Con wrote: 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . He was not priginally a Jew but on earth he was born in the Jewish community. Jesus Christ started the religion know as Christianity and therefore could not be a member of Judaism making him not a Jew by rights. To be a Jew you must be a part of the religion of Judaism. Oops!Samuel Ungerleider Professor of Judaic Studies and Professor of Religious Studies Brown UniversityWas Jesus Jewish and, if he was, how would that have influenced his experiences as a young man growing up in Galilee? Was Jesus a Jew? Of course, Jesus was a Jew. He was born of a Jewish mother, in Galilee, a Jewish part of the world. All of his friends, associates, colleagues, disciples, all of them were Jews. He regularly worshipped in Jewish communal worship, what we call synagogues. He preached from Jewish text, from the Bible. He celebrated the Jewish festivals. He went on pilgrimage to the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem where he was under the authority of priests.... He lived, was born, lived, died, taught as a Jew. This is obvious to any casual reader of the gospel text. What's striking is not so much that he was a Jew but that the gospels make no pretense that he wasn't. The gospels have no sense yet that Jesus was anything other than a Jew. The gospels don't even have a sense that he came to found a new religion, an idea completely foreign to all the gospel text, and completely foreign to Paul. That is an idea which comes about only later. So, to say that he was a Jew is saying a truism, is simply stating an idea that is so obvious on the face of it, one wonders it even needs to be said. But, of course, it does need to be said because we all know what happens later in the story, where it turns out that Christianity becomes something other than Judaism and as a result, Jesus in retrospect is seen not as a Jew, but as something else, as a founder of Christianity. But, of course, he was a Jew. (Emphasis by Composer(Pro) Source: http://www.pbs.org...)&William Goodwin Aurelio Professor of the Appreciation of Scripture, Boston University [W]hat we've learned from the gospel stories is not that Jesus was not Jewish. Quite the opposite. . . . . (Source: http://www.pbs.org...)I Composer(Pro) have therefore soundly and unambiguously vindicated ALL of my Debate arguments whilst Con is left a proven rejected Jewish jebus fraud, a malignant sinner, agent of his devil and a selfish & disobedient luster out for witholding personal possessions & property etc. & lusting also for promises of Story book rewards from his now proven imaginary friend!I would request that Con refrain from further personal insults towards Pro however I understand Cons frustration at being unambiguously exposed as a jebus reject, devils agent and all round pretend believer!Over to Con!