Theism is the default position

You’re confusing disbelief with stupidity, it’s different. An atheist knows what god is, but rejects the belief (AKA disbelief) A baby doesn’t know what god is, so the babe can’t disbelief something what it doesn’t know. I know this is true because I was a baby once, and knew that I was stupid later. Sense theism is the lack of disbelief, obviously you can’t disbelieve something that you don’t know about. It doesn’t cry in disbelief when a mom goes, it cries because baby’s winy. It doesn’t drink milk because it’s not thirsty. It doesn’t like to be touched because it doesn’t know the person who is touching. It’s not because of disbelief, it’s because of a lack of knowledge (stupidity). That isn’t disbelief by the baby, that’s confusion. The baby doesn’t disbelieve that his mom exists (obvious because the child points), but is confused to which twin is his mom. Also babies don’t know the concept that nothing exists, they don’t know anything from the beginning, so they can’t revert back to that state mrntslity you were talking about. For example, solipsistics might believe that nothing exists, but with me I disbelieve that nothing exists. So I don’t believe in things like a true void, emptiness, vacuum etc. I think every inch of the universe is crawling with some form of invisible radiation (e.g. light, magnets etc) or can be explained away with things like the æther and such. I just think that nothingness is an illusion that your mind made up, it really doesn’t exist. Proving that nothing really does exist is impossible because it doesn’t take up any space (space is not nothing because it has length width & height, “nothing” does not), so you can’t exactly point to it to prove that exists (the evidence for “nothing” is not empirical). I’m certain nothing doesn’t exist, why believe that it exists? Just because there are many gods that are false, does not mean that all gods are false, its fallacious reasoning. You’re asserting that the atheist disbelief is the only rational position. I disagree. Basic atheist logic is this… PREMISE: I disbelieve any evidence for god (e.g. Scripture, ontological, teleological, etc), CONCLUSION: therefore he doesn’t exist. Don’t you see the bad conclusion? A better conclusion would be “Therefore I don’t know he exists” (agnosticism) not that he doesn’t exist. Just because some holocaust denier disbelieves the evidence for the holocaust, does not mean that the holocaust never happened. Just because a flat earth believer rejects the evidence for a spherical earth, this does not mean that the earth is not a sphere, the flat earther simply doesn’t know it’s a sphere. My point is that agnosticism is more rational then atheism. You are incorrect, atheism takes a gamble that God doesn’t exist because it can’t prove that he doesn’t exist. I detect that you are a belieber. The music video you presented is awful singing when you think of the billions of years. If natural selection has been going on for billions of years, surely it would of selected a better musician by now. Have you not watched Baby? Around the third minute of the music video it shows him dancing on the bowling alley, which is STUPID because its slippery.http://youtu.be...; Also, the onion news network has reported him to be a 51 year old pedophile in disguise.http://www.theonion.com... Vote PRO! Theism is the default position!