I Will Not Contradict Myself

==Rules==My opponent basically says that the reason why his answers were vague/obscure is because he tried to explain. VIOLATED RULE: In Rounds 2-4, PRO will answer all of CON's questions with Yes, No, or an explanation as to why neither answer would be completely correct. Case 1: On my second question, I aksed "Do you think border secuirty should be increased to stop aliens from crossing the border between America and Mexico"He answered with"More border security, more state solutions, DREAM act." Now this could easily be an explanation, I concede. However, there is no clear answer.His statement could be interpreted as "Yes, we need more border security, more state solutions, DREAM act....etc"or"No, we need more border security WITH more state solutions, etc"or"Yes/No, we need more border security WITH more state solutions, etc"Case 2: Question 9. "Is Earth a sad place right now?"He answers...."In many ways, yes. In others, no."He basically says neither answer is fully correct. However, do you spot ANY explanation? I do not.Case 3: Question 5, : "Do you think citizens should have smoking/tobacco rights?"He answers..."Only on their own private property. Not in public. "This can also be seen as an explanation. However, the answer is unclear.It could be seen as"Yes, citizens should have smoking/tobacco rights on their own private property, but not in public"or"No, citizens should only have rights on their own private property, not in public"or"Yes and no. Citizens should be allowed to smoke on their private property, but not in public."==(Contra)dictions==1. Bush and ImmigrationI never mentioned the DREAM act. Completely irrelevent - I ONLY mentioned border security. You stated that you disagreed with ALL of Bush's views, but apparently you and Bush both agree on one specific policy - increasing border security.2. Religious Ideals Vs. AbortionWow. My opponent gives such vague answers, I don't even... The general gist is that abortion is seen as immoral by Christians.3. Obama and Gun BansI don't get what my opponent is trying to say. Contra stated that he opposed gun bans. Obama supports gun bans [1] [2]. Contra supports Obama.4. Drug LegalizationMy opponent made no argument against this. Contra supports the legalization of some drugs, while Obama wants no drugs to be legalized. Contra, on the other hand, supports Obama's views. If he truly did, Contra would not support any sort of legalization. I don't see how this isn't a contradiction.5. Bush and Death PenaltyFundamentally, both Bush and my opponent support the usage of the death penalty in some situations. I bet they both can agree that people who rape and murder children should be executed, but for some reason, my opponent doesn't support Bush "at all".6. China and the USMy opponent stated in round three that China is not an enemy. "Enemy" is defined as a "a hostile nation or state" [3]. He states in Round 4 that China and the US are hostile towards each other, which basically means that China is actually an enemy. Two different positions...7. Inanimate Life and the EarthAlthough unclear, my opponent apparently believes that, in round two, the Earth has the capacity to be sad. Earth is defined as..."( often initial capital letter ) the planet third in order from the sun, having an equatorial diameter of 7926 miles (12,755 km) and a polar diameter of 7900 miles (12,714 km), a mean distance from the sun of 92.9 million miles (149.6 million km), and a period of revolution of 365.26 days, and having one satellite." [4].It is quite obvious that the physical Earth itself is lifeless. The land mass we are currently standing on isn't alive. Later, in round 4, he said that inanimate objects cannot have emotions, contrary to what he said about Earth in the first round.8. Aid and Focusing on our HomeHe stated in round 3 that "We can however support Democracies with intelligence forces and foregin aid, but no MILITARY aid. Obama and me disagree here somewhat."He then stated that the government should protect the people and focus on issues at home first, instead of foreign countries in round 4.==Sources==[1] http://www.gunbanobama.com...[2] http://www.ontheissues.org...[3] http://dictionary.reference.com...[4] http://dictionary.reference.com...