9spaceking will Lose this Debate

Contention 1: Caesar and Times New Roman I never heard of Emmett Nicholson so that is irrevelant. Caesar was betryed by his frined and this shows that since I'm using Times New Roman that a good frined of mine wheather it be ESocial, Truth_Seeker, or even GCL, they will betray me and vote for my opponent due to a secrate plan my opponent has done so he could win this debate. So with that I fear losing this debate. I also now fear for my life as Pro's spirit has probably been sent out to haunt me. Contention 2: Lying Paradox Though it is indeed a select a winner debate there are plenty of times where a person votes on this kinda debate as they would vote on a 7 point debate. As a matter of fact herei s a select a winner vote that was caste 4 weeks ago by yours truely. " Close debate, but I shall judge this as if it were a normal 7 point debate. First is S&G/Conduct I will change this to who had the most influence in the debate as in who's flow and style made the greatest impression on the debate and I'll give this point(s) to Con as his lengthening of his rapping caused Pro to react by increasing his length as well and this continued throughout the debate. For Sources that point goes to Pro, his sources were in greater number and more relivant. And finially for the current 2-2 tie breaker who had the better insults. The winner of that cattegory is Con. If anyone needs me to clarify this RFD please ask." (http://www.debate.org...) So you see that Conduct means a lot even in a select a winner debate. Contention 3: Losing Trend My opponent here is incorrect as the debate that I defeated 9Spaceking was the first debate that we squared off in, the second two came afterwards. If you see here in my losses section of my profile he actually handed me back to back losses showing that he is better than me. (http://www.debate.org...) Contention 4: Lannan13 I have shown in my second round that my opponent is actually Princess Celestia and she is more powerful and more popular than Princess Luna as my opponent had banished me to the moon for over 1,000 years before forgiving me. Contention 5: Errors and Yodeling My opponent dropps this 3.5 argument so I extend that across the board. You see that since my opponent could realize his own errors he could take steps to fix it while it took me a genious in Stephen_Hawkings to actually understand that I messed up and that shows poor leadership by me which further confirms the Celestia and Luna theory. My opponent is able to break glass with his yodeling. Now THAT takes skill and that's a skill I don't have. Contention 6: Gingerism Though I maybe some souless ginger and outcast pony my opponent is the 9th Space King. He commands the entire universes military and a death star which could kill all of the Gingers. Contention 7: Opponent's skill. My opponent is super skillful, he used photoshop, something I don't know how to use....whoops I mean screan shot, close enough right? No? Oh welll... Anyways he can do things that I don't even know nor can comprhend how to do and then he tempted Airmax and the threat of being banned by making it appear that he forfeited this debate when he skill had over 2 days left to argue. Now that takes balls! See my opponent is more of a man and more skillful than me and there's not a snow ball chance in hell I can defeat him. Thank you and good night everybody.