We should bring democracy into Saudi Arabia

1. "And second of all my opponent said i do plagiarism but first off have you been to a really debate tournament. I guess thats a know with the knowledge he gave me. That is what you are suppose to do in debate. Find evidence and print it out. So you attacking my whole argument saying " Ohh he plagiarized OMG his arguments don't count" But no, that is what you are supposed to do in REAL DEBATE."Although my opponents bad grammar make it quite difficult to understand his meaning here, I believe he is trying to accuse me of ad hominem. My answer is is this:I do not attack my opponents intelligence, integrity, or character in order to negate his arguments. I point out his plagiarism to the voters because they are to judge him on proper use of sources. I also point out that my opponent is not presenting an argument of his own, but simply copying anything that talks about democracy in the middle east.2."My opponent also said that my evidence is poorly disguised but first off, PressTV is like CNN but in Arabia. Its basically saying that CNN is poor disguised. Exactly so his refute to my argument is invalid because Press TV is like CNN but in Arabia." My exact quote is as follows:"While PressTV appears to be a run of the mill media outlet,my opponents second source, syrianews.cc, is a poorly disguised blogsite masquerading as a reputable news source. It is run by ardent supporters of the Syrian rebels, if not by the rebels themselves. All of this information can be gleaned just by reading the website home page."I will underline the exact clause in question:"my opponents second source, syrianews.cc, is a poorly disguised blogsite masquerading as a reputable news source." I encourage the voters to compare my quote to the one my opponent ascribes to me. It becomes abundantly clear that my opponent did not properly read my arguments before responding. 3.And my opponent also said that the headline for my evidence is Obama"s Death Squads Strike Syria, Again: 9 Killed, 30 Seriously Wounded in Attack on School Buses and School"Obamas Death Squad" refers to a separate rebel faction whom they accuse of receiving aid from America. They identify the victims as martyrs. The voters should keep these things in mind when voting on sources.But i am sorry i don't think it said that: What is says is that: Saudi Sunnis, Shias want to replace monarchy with democracy: Analyst. Protesters have held a demonstration against the repressive regime of Al Saud in Tarout Island of Saudi Arabia.And you could even check that out ON THE WEBSITE. I think my opponents eyes must be checked by a doctor. Again, I will present the clause in question as a direct quote from R2:"To give the voter a sense of this website used as a source by my opponent, here is a headline:Obama’s Death Squads Strike Syria, Again: 9 Killed, 30 Seriously Wounded in Attack on School Buses and School"Obamas Death Squad" refers to a separate rebel faction whom they accuse of receiving aid from America. They identify the victims as martyrs. The voters should keep these things in mind when voting on sources."Allow me to highlight this clause:"To give the voter a sense of this website used as a source by my opponent, here is a headline" I clearly state that I am about to present a headline taken from the same website my opponent uses as a source for his arguments. I do not claim that this headline is used by my opponent in his argument. This is a textbook example of the Straw Man Fallacy. I also suspect that my opponent resorts to ad hominem in suggesting that I get my eyes checked.4. "Wow i must read that sight again because what is says is that the royal in Arabis will shoot people if they protest and that will stop protests in Arabia. BUT, what I'm saying is that the people want a democracy. My opponent really needs to read the evidence one more time."Here my opponent reemphasises his this tabloid as evidence. I have two responses.1. This is an emphasis on the idea that Saudis are ok with democracy as long as it stays out of their nation. here is the title one more time:THE SENSITIVE SAUDIS: THEY WANT DEMOCRACY FOR EVERYONE ELSE2.This is a tabloid. This is not evidence. I encourage the voters to make note of this.5."Also Thes are oppoinons from people.. AHH THAT WHERE HE CONDRADICTS HIMSELF BECUASE HE AGREES THAT THESE OPINIONS ARE FROM PEOPLE RIGHT? SO THE PEOPEL DO WANT DEMOCRACY! SO THAT POINT ON HIS SIDE CONCEDS." My opponent says this in relation to this clause:"this is an opinion piece, illustrating the opinion of an American novelist. Hardly applicable to the feelings of the general Saudi population." I will explain this in simpler terms. This is what ONE AMERICAN THINKS and does not relate to the Saudi people. Secondly, it is a piece on Saudi foreign policy, not on form of government.6."And advide to my opponent: Think before you type." I thank my opponent in sharing this piece of advice with me. In return, I will dedicate the rest of my character count to sincere advice addressed directly to my opponent. Firstly, I will say that this is not sarcastic, and I am not patronizing. I am sincere in what I am about to say.Incognito13, as it stands, you will utterly lose this debate in a devastating defeat. You may not have a chance of fixing it in your last argument, but these guidelines will help. If they don't work for you here, then at least save them for later debates.1. Do not get angry. Your last argument was a heated rant. You made no sense in anything you said, and you made personal accusations against your opponent. If you do that, a lose is guaranteed. 2. There is nothing wrong with copying and pasting, but you must cite your sources. The voters will check you on this.3. Check your sources for relevance. If you are going to paste a source, please make sure it is actually talking about the debate.5. Carefully read your opponents arguments. If you rush, then you will not understand what your opponent is saying, and you will end up embarrassing yourself.6. Check your grammar and spelling. that makes a huge difference with the voters.That's all I'll say. Follow these guidelines for your next argument and you might get some votes on your side. Good Luck.In closing, my opponent failed to illustrate that we should bring democracy into Saudi Arabia. BOP was on my opponent, and he failed to present.