God probably exists

So your point of me making defences is irrelevant. You did not answer my question. This is not a defence, just saying that we cannot fully prove either sides of the argument at the moment but atheism is more probable – sticks to the argument Response to Part 2: Is Christianity not an Abrahamic religion? This debate is primarily about Christianity. Also, abiding by the rules you would have looked up the definition of religion. The belief in a god. I said to define all of the words using oxford dictionary, I can’t define every word for you. Spirituality is another subject and that is generally a sort of worship but not to a god necessarily. I may have made the mistake of saying monarchy instead of emperor, however that further proves the point in this argument. Look at the first paragraph of the website you linked me too. “Caesar’s Messiah was a book published by a dot com businessman named Joseph Atwill in 2005. Last year, he released a documentary based on the book and everyone is talking about it all of a sudden, because Atwill put out the world’s most misleading press release for his film screening in London. Richard Dawkins then retweeted the press release, even though he said he didn’t endorse the theory, and now this eight-year-old theory is news again. Thank you, Richard Dawkins. ” He is not professional in the subject. I too can write a book, that does not make it true. It says how misleading it is here. This is the sites first paragraph you linked me too! You are right! “Even if a religion is created in utter duplicity-that says nothing about OTHER RELIGIONS, or OTHER gods". That is right, but since this is about Christianity it seems odd you make this point, considering I just justified my point Response to Transition: Once again we are arguing about Christianity! !! I have given specific and significant evidence, about why Christianity was created for this purpose. Confucianism is completely different and not mentioned in my argument. Answer too “Why is atheism more probable than god? / Why is god less probable than atheism? ” Well that is what we are debating, so read my arguments. Also, please respond to my question Response to Part 1: Once again we are debating about Christianity! What sort of amazing leader lies consistently when it breaks his own rules Jesus is believed to have been the son of god (. http://www.everystudent.com...). He had enough power to heal people, come back to life ect… since we can’t do this it seems evident that he may not be as knowledgeable as god, but more knowledgeable than us. I don’t define every word for you, that is why the rules specify that you use the Oxford Dictionary. I don’t care what your definition is, use Oxford Dictionary like specified. If you actually read the rules I preface I did say this was about Christianity! Personally, I believe in no god nor any spiritual belief. Those other spiritual beliefs prays don’t work either as well, as you agreed. The thing is you just took a swing at air as this is about is there a god of Christianity and you said basically that no prayers work. Well if you ask me that looks like some evidence to me as if you check the passages I listed in the bible you will see it says prayers will be answered. It does not matter what other beliefs are, Christianity explicitly says lies in its holy book. Response to Part 2: I did not say ("Think about DNA for a second" by the formation of DNA. ") That makes no sentence, I said the first part of those quotation marks. I do keep up with a lot of this sort of information. If indeed you looked at fact, instead of alternative theories you would realise that Abiogenesis and much of evolution are fact. Abiogenesis could have happened in early earth conditions and when placed side by side with evolution we can see how we have complex organisms. Also, predeterminism does not contradict natural selection and much of evolution. Even if it did, who cares predeterminsm does not even necessarily suggest we were all programed by something. Even more, predeterminism, is a theory, that means it is not necessarily true. Don’t misquote me even more! To accuse me of ("God" is the "creator of the Universe. ") is incorrect. The actual quote is “the all-powerful creator and ruler of the universe”. See the last bit of “and ruler of the universe”, no full stop there. Using the definitions like are required based on the rules, Oxford dictionary defines the word ruler “A person exercising government or dominion. ” Well if god is doing such things he must be around to do that. I am in no sense saying that an all-powerful being could not do that, I am saying that all powerful ruler you speak of is very unlikely. Also as I stated earlier, if he were real he does not even follow his own rules Yes you are spot on! Evolution does address life on this planet! That is its purpose. Charles Darwin worked much of his life as a biologist, and dedicated much of his life seeing how life diversified on its own. He did not intend to explain the creation of the universe. That is what the theories of everything are meant to explain. Notice I say theory, because they are still being reworked. This has to be the worst point I have ever heard (“Evolution doesn"t ADDRESS the singularity-it only addresses life on THIS planet which is irrelevant to creation which happened at least 14 billion years PRIOR to this planet". ) John 1:3 Genesis 2:7 Genesis 1:1 Colossians 2:8 Genesis 1:21 Hebrews 11:1-3 Romans 1:20-27 2 Peter 3:8 Genesis 1:26 2 Peter 3:3-6 Genesis 1:27 Job 40:15-18 Genesis 1:1-31 Romans 5:12-21 John 5:46-47 John 1:1-10 Psalm 105:1-45 2 Timothy 4:3 Romans 1:20 Romans 1:18 1 Timothy 2:13 Psalm 14:1-5 Psalm 14:1 Exodus 20:11 Genesis 2:1-25 1 John 5:19 1 Corinthians 11:8-9 Romans 1:25 Acts 17:26 John 6:44 John 1:1 Genesis 1:20 Genesis 1:11 John 8:32 Hebrews 6:1-20 2 Timothy 3:12 1 Timothy 4:1-5 1 Corinthians 15:22 1 Corinthians 1:26-29 Romans 12:2 Romans 1:25-27 John 3:12 Matthew 24:4 Matthew 19:11 Matthew 19:4-6 Amos 8:11-12 Daniel 1:17 Jeremiah 33:2-3 Isaiah 43:18-19 Ecclesiastes 8:17 Ecclesiastes 3:18-20 Proverbs 14:15 Job 38:4 1 Samuel 2:3 Genesis 9:2 Genesis 2:19 Genesis 1:28 2 Timothy 3:16 1 Timothy 6:20-21 Colossians 2:3 Ephesians 6:11-13 2 Corinthians 11:14 Acts 17:23-29 Matthew 16:21-23 Psalm 150:6 Psalm 139:13-14 Psalm 119:99 Psalm 90:2-4 Job 12:7-11 1 Chronicles :1-54 Exodus 20:1-26 Genesis 25:25 Genesis 10:1-11:32 Genesis 3:20 John 3:16 Ecclesiastes 12:12 Job 12:7-9 Well considering all of these mentions of evolution in a negative connotation this all wise god perhaps made a few mistakes in his book of truth. It seems strange that the person who is thought to have created everything does not even know what he is talking about. Response to Part 3: Sorry but I did not think your refutes could get even more incorrect. Firstly you say this, (There"s only one religion with a "bible" and while they may differ across sects" that doesn"t mean other religions have "bibles. ") then your next line is (For starters, bible means "library. " SOME religions have a group of books compiled to make a library or "bible. "). This is so strange. Let me get it straight. .. 1. So 1 religion has a bible 2. Bible means library, defined by you 3. Some religions have “a group of books compiled to make a library or "bible. "” – you 4. Thus only 1 religion has a bible, but some others have a bible We are arguing about Christianity! Your point about other religions not have a bible or god is pointless. Don’t get ahead of yourself buddy. That is the pretty much the definition of the Christian god. Since I use the definition from a dictionary to argue against the belief in what that definition defines means nothing. Because I use a definition does not mean I believe in what it defines. They lost the war you make point of. Pfffft, the war that killed many people, that is not a commandment isn’t it? Are you claiming that god helped his believers kill many even though it broke the rule that he excludes people from heaven for. Response to Part 4: I don’t care what your definition is. The rules are oxford dictionaries definitions. This links back to my first points on the why god was created bit. It is saying that the world is dysfunctional and god allows that to all of his ‘children’. Do you think that religion is good for society? It inhibits knowledge, justifies inhuman actions, allows people to not abide by the law and then, kill themselves and think they are going to have a better life, holy wars… the list continues Where is the refute for my “For the record” KO