THB: That on balance it is preferable to have a small penis.

Let's review this debate1) Reviewing the ResolutionIn all regards this debate is about sexual preference in many ways. Wylted tries to straw man this to no end but fails to hit the heart of the debate. As I pointed out in my example of why it is preferable to be a tall QB in football, there are certain factors that attach themselves to certain types of perceptions. A dik has one purpose, and that is to impregnate women and to be used for sex. Wylted takes the route that says anyone can have any preference, but that fails to touch on the aspect as to why it is preferable. This is a blind assertion by Pro that is not supported by any type of evidence. He is just saying people want small diks because they want small diks. Then in almost a hypocritical stance, he lists reasons as to why it is preferable to have a small dik. Such as the fallacious big dik = crime argument. He uses this as his primary and I do mean primary because it's literally the only argument he has, as to show why guys prefer small diks over big diks. Even if we acknowledge that this argument is true (which it's not) , it does not show that most people prefer small diks because of this reasonThe resolution is literally it is preferable to have a small dik compared to a big dik and then we define the parameters by inches and girth. I have shown that a great deal of guys want to have bigger diks and this is because of how females desire bigger diks (see my sources). In addition to this nearly 60-70 percent of all guys desire and want a bigger dik [1]. This is included in on my earlier sources as well. Almost no guy is ever satisfied with their size and they all prefer to be larger due to the perception and desire that women have for a bigger penis. No matter how much wylted tries to straw man this argument and principle, the resolution stands. A Womens preference in Dik size is a massive factor as to what size of a dik a guy prefers. 2) Big DIk = CrimeI refuted this in my last round but my adversary fails to really address this after that. You can view my source from the last round but testosterone at the least is a catalyst for anger, but it is not the primary cause for men getting angry. My adversary is drawing the conclusion that testosterone causes crime, and big diks make someone have more testosterone. This is a fallacious in a great many ways .This is addressed in my source from last round [Round 3 source 2]"[Historically,] researchers expected an increase in testosterone levels to inevitably lead to more aggression, and this didn't reliably occur," says Frank McAndrew, a professor of psychology at Knox College in Galesburg, Ill. Indeed, the latest research about testosterone and aggression indicates that there's only a weak connection between the two. And when aggression is more narrowly defined as simple physical violence, the connection all but disappears.[1]"There is literally no connection between testosterone and violence as I pointed out in my previous round, in addition to this he is making a connection of crime to penis size and was relating it to primarily African Americans which was combining two different syllogisms into one. He refines this and says that big diks in general cause crime, but as I stated in my last round, there is virtually no connection to testosterone and violence. Even if we considered his contention as true, the amount of testosterone compared to someone with a 4 inch dik and someone with a 10 inch dik is so minuscule that it does not even really matter, but this is a non factor in itself as testosterone in general does not even really contribute to violence that much if virtually at all. 3) Womens PreferenceAs I have stated over and over throughout this debate, Women almost always and I do mean almost always prefer a bigger dik. I have countless sources backing this up from above where it varies from 60-90 percent of all women chose a penis over 6 inches in tests with the majority being on the high end towards 7 inches. Due to how Pro defined the resolution, his BOP is to show that it is preferable to have a small dik (5 inches or below). Per my sources and arguments a womens wants and needs play into a guys desire to have a larger dik. This is verified by my sources as well. Due to this almost no guy is happy with his dik size( nearly 70 percent of men want a larger dik because of this). Almost objectively women always want a dik over 5 inches. Due to a womens desire, guys in turn want a bigger dik to please them. This remains non refuted throughout the entire debateI did this and forgot to post it last round but its a fun graph about DDO female members. Let's review the masses of DDO girls and DDO gay guys Dik preferences. I interviewed 10 people on DDO 7 girls and 3 guys. This is a study that shows what most DDO girls and guys prefer as their dik size. I had this set up as a chart but it will not post, so I will just cite the study from least to mostAnon 1 - 6 inchesAnon 2 - 6 inches Anon 3 - 6-7 inchesAnon 4 - 6-7 inchesAnon 5 - 6-7 inchesAnon 6 - 6-7 inchesAnon 7 - 6-7 inchesAnon 8 - 6-7 inchesAnon 9 - 7-8 inchesAnon 10 - 8 or greaterThis was just a fun fact to show what girls and gay guys on DDO are looking forConclusionAs fun as it was most of wylteds arguments were off topic, and he did not defend his BOP. I was able to show why on balance it is preferable and even why on balance more guys always prefer to have a larger dik. Thanks to wylted for the debate, it was fun[1]http://www.modernghana.com...[2]http://www.scientificamerican.com...