Fender makes the best guitars

Pro has not proven his case. He completely ignores the science behind the building of a superior guitar. He says I should have not accepted the debate unless I was willing to accept his terms. I have proven all of his terms moot. Science doesn't lie, and he made no attempt to disprove my assertions about how a superior quality guitar is built. Other than to say it's a non argument and not part of the debate terms and that mass production doesn't equal reductions in sound and intonation quality. He said I didn't address hardware quality. I did address it. Slapping hardware on a guitar for a one size fits all setup in preposterous. Listing a litany of hardware part names proves nothing. He said I had to show another guitar with equal name recognition and history. The longevity of a company and name recognition has nothing to do with a scientifically quality built guitar. It has more to do with skilled marketing strategies IE: Paying famous people to play their guitars. He would have you believe that because some famous person played a Fender that some how translates into a quality built guitar. He would have you believe that because Fender invented a sound effect that translates into a quality guitar. He would have you believe that fancy marketing and popularity translates into a quality built guitar. Pro would have you believe that a custom hand made guitar is inferior to a Fender mass produced guitar. Fender may have good marketing and name recognition but that does not translate into a quality guitar. Guitars don't write music people do. Pro denies that mass production does not sacrifice on quality. This is just plain delusional. I proved this conclusively. Pro asked for names of people who play guitars and the guitars they play. I gave a list that has the most influential people in music today. PSR guitars are hands down superior to Fender guitars and hand built guitars are hands down better than PSR guitars. Even PSR recognizes this fact and they make guitars. Fender is not the best guitar. It is a mass produced throw away guitar for the masses. Even with all the conclusive evidence I have given with regard to guitar construction and what makes the best guitar Pro seems to think none of that matters. "Hand made smand made he says" Jimi Hendrix played a Fender, so what. What does that have to to with the science of constructing a superior guitar. Pro lives in denial when it comes to the science of guitar building. Marketing and longevity of a brand name has nothing to do with the science of making a superior guitar. Bolting a sound effect to an already inferior guitar does not make it better than a hand built painstakingly scientifically crafted guitar with out it. Pro says a $2600 Fender guitar ain't cheap as far as he is concerned. Well maybe that's because he can't afford any better. It's pocket change in the world of hand built guitars. It wouldn't even buy you a set of hand wound hand built pick ups. I apologize to my opponent and all you other Fender lovers out there for calling a $2600 Fender a throwaway guitar. But facts are facts, they are flung into audiences on a regular bases like I could throw a quarter out the window to a bum. The readers of this debate can not ignore the scientific facts about what separates great guitars from mass produced guitars for the masses. Fender is not the best guitar regardless of it's history regardless of who plays them regardless of what hardware is put on it. Fender is the Toyota Camry of guitars, it's a good guitar but it ain't the best guitar by a long shot. It isn't even the best built mass produced guitar.