BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
should those both involved in a inappropriate relationship face equal consequences

My opponent makes a good point but adults should take the responsibility no matter how hard the child may through themselves at them that's just the same as a prostitute throwing thereselves at you you knowing that this person may have a disease it up to you if your going to take charge. when I was in high school one of the teachers slept with the student yes she did through her self at him but he was 35 years old he could have took responsibility and reported her but no he took this as an opportunity to get layed and guess who got punished him not her . he took advantage of the studying so yeah you are grown you should know when you go to court the judge doesn't care about the child no matter if they through themselves on you there always going to look at the sick person who advantage of the poor child. How many case have you seen and on the adult is being punished think about it when you see a case like this your going to think about this person this sick. when I see this on the news everyday its always the same thing the adult should have took control and said no and that's just that. Adults should be punished because the should know better and take charge of the situation by reporting it cause in the end the one who will suffer the most is them.
should those both involved in a inappropriate relationship face equal consequences

I don't know where you come from or what your sexual education was like, but most teenagers have more than just basic knowledge of the consequences of sexual activity. I'm sure most know what sex is by the time they enter middle school, and know you can have babies from doing it by the time they leave (learning either from school, parents, or their dirty-talking friends on the bus). In high school, most teenagers get a good run-down of all the fun things they can get from having sexual relations (Herpes, Gonorrhea, HIV, just to name a few). Any teenager (let's say 14 and over for the sake of the debate) can tell you that not-so-good things can (and do) happen when you have sex. Despite what mainstream media might say about the generation, teens are not dumb. Theyare more mature than they've ever been. (http://www.scientificamerican.com...) ("But Stonewall, that article says that mature teens are reckless, like adults!") Exactly, like adults. If such teens aren't to blame for their reckless behavior, then why are adults? After all, the brain patterns are stikingly similar. Adults have the same basic functions as these "reckless" teenagers do, so they should face equal blame and punishment.I understand: Adults have more world experience than these teens do. I suppose I can't really argue with that. But most sexual situations regarding adults and teens are typically in that 15/25-year-old range. Recent studies also find that 25 is the new age for leaving adolescence. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk...) That's not a "Our society is too lenient!" thing, but more of a science- our brains are still developing at that age. That keeps with the idea that most adults who are involved with that sort of relationship are in as much of a biological pickle as their younger significant others.I mean, if the relationship is between a 50-year-old man and a 13-year-old girl (or vice-versa), I can't really say they should face equal punishment. That'd be pushing it. But that's not how most major age difference relationships work. Like I said, it's mostly in that 10-year-range, and usually not that wide. They all have that same basic grasp of "This is not okay." Would similar punishments be faced if a 21-year-old had a relationship with a 36-year-old? Of course not. They might get the odd sideways glance from their friends and family, but that's all. 15 years is no biggy. So why should it be a big deal when the relationship is a five-year difference between a 21-year-old and a 16-year-old?
Which is more annoying YOLO or SWAG

Swag is the most overused words in Schools now a day. People be saying that they got swag and money and they think that automatically makes them be cool. Swag is just a slang word that has no literal meaning as it is not in the dictionary. Yolo is something that could accually influence someone, but swag is just a lifestyle. No one really has swag, but you can live life yolo. People over hype how much swag you have all the time, as it can lead to ignorance and fights.
Which is more annoying YOLO or SWAG

YOLO in my opinion is way more over used and taken more serious than the word SWAG. YOLO is a phrase that means You Only Live Once and is leading youth to do stupid things because "You only live once." Swag is just a word that is talking about style and how you are. Plus now you see people in YOLO sweatshirts and T-shirts and you don't see that with SWAG. That is why I think YOLO is more annoying than SWAG. If you don't agree with me you can try to beat me but you know that YOLO is annoying
Which is more annoying YOLO or SWAG

Your argument sucks dude, people take there swag way more serious. Young kids will go into depressive stages if there friends tell them theuy aint got swag. Swag has turned into a overhyped term in schools now a days. Kids where shirts and base there clothes on there swag. There idols "rappers" rap about how much swag they have which influences todays youth into making decisions to have swag. Having swag causes dress code viloations and will get people in trouble. You probably have no swag, which is why your dissing it. ABOUT TO HAVE A SWAG ATTACK RIGHT HERE!
League Re-Alignment, by random order.

"Simply stated, realign the leagues." No No No No No... From what I've gathered, saywhen24 suggests that MLB should resort to changing the divisions and possibly the leagues. The reasoning is based on the lack of competition in interleague play. What I will do in this debate round is prove that saywhen24's call for a drastic change in MLB team structure is not necessary while also showing that it will have negative impacts on the game of baseball. When judging this round, I would expect the reader to use the following framework for making a decision: Pro must provide clear reasoning for his plan and why it is necessary. I believe that more detailed plan would be useful to win this round. Con should be given the victory if I can show that the negative impacts of saywhen24's plan will outweigh the current "problems". Now for my constructive argument: There is no reason to realign the leagues in the MLB. -Since the introduction of interleague play in 1997, many fans have grown to love the possibility of teams of the same city duking it out (Stl./KC,NYY/NYM,ChiWS/ChiCubs). However, in later years many have noticed an edge that the American League has gained over the National League in interleague play. Of course, the two leagues vary in rules. How an American League pitcher can be expected to hit against a dominant National League pitcher is odd. However, it is very entertaining. Watching some of my favorite American League pitchers step up to the plate every once in a while is a very fun thing to watch. saywhen24's plan suggests that we might just use one league, perhaps completely eliminating a pitcher from ever stepping up to the plate. After many fans lost hope for baseball after the advent of the Designated Hitter, problems would surely erupt with the elimination of pitchers hitting at all. -Many would see the All-star game as being an indicator of the lack of competitiveness between the two leagues. However, now that the All-star game actually "means something" both leagues are expected to try and it has certainly been proven to be a good match-up; just look at the latest mid-summer battle which lasted 15 innings. Realigning the leagues could endanger an already close match-up and take away some of the league-to-league rivalries that may have developed over the past century. -Just because something like this hasn't been done for a while does not necessitate it. The Brewers example does not prove that we need the plan. *saywhen24 must show a reason for change. Aaaand...as much as I hate to use this already cliche election 2k8 phrase, "We don't need change just for the sake of change." I'll go ahead and stop there. I am really looking forward to refuting saywhen24's arguments if he wishes to explain his plan in detail. saywhen24: very interesting concept. Thanks for the debate.
League Re-Alignment, by random order.

Simply stated, realign the leauges. The last time anything like this had happened is when the Milwaukee Brewers switched from an AL Central Division all the way to NL Central. The Leagues might have to go to just AL West and East or North and South. Top 2 teams in Division go to playoffs. Call it what you will. There will still be 3 playoffs until you get to the World Series. After reveiweing the NL's records showed that the NL have had trouble in the interleague plays with 5 teams in the AL pulvarizing their NL counterparts. Through all of the scandals of the past 10 years this might be one of the things in baseball to keep it in Americas eye, as their past time.
Humans are animals

Human are in the group Mammalia, we all got fur, give live birth and are warm blooded. We are closely related to chimpanzees because of how we both raise families, care for young, form gangs, kill others, and have emotion. Science has proven that the smartest animal is not the Humans but the Bottlenose Dolphin Our close relative as I said is the Chimps, native to around where the first humans were first to devolve. In the wild chimpanzees use sticks to go into the holes to collect termites for food. They form groups that they will mate for love and raise children for years like people. Chimps will also form gangs and attack smaller individuals, like people they will defend themselves or attack. They also have emotion, Chimps can get mad over food and care for a while, or die if there mom died if a sickness. Parrots are pretty smart too, Alex was a African Grey Parrot who knew as much a five year old and a emotional level as a two year old. With being the smartest, Chimps and Dolphins are #1. If you think about us humans we are pretty stupid, we cut down a tree and write on it to save paper. Dolphins have been used to spy on ships in the U.S Navy.
Humans are animals

Us humans were made different than dolphins to develop technology as dolphins were not made as well to develop technology. Let's just forget about the I.Q of the animals because that doesn't make you an animal. There are many things that make you an animal, Ask yourself... Do I have hair on any part of my body? Am I breathing the air that I need to live by? Did I eat today to help me live and grow stronger? Do humans reproduce by a male and a female? These are all sights of being a mammal. We might be smarter than most of the other species, live in cement, drive cars and own other animals as pets. We are still animals. The only thing that differs from us and other animals is how we live. Chimps are a close relative and they catch prey with tools and make family's kinds like us Credits: science class
I would beat you in a Pokemon battle.

"Actually according to . http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net......(type), Ice types only have average resistance to Dragon-Type moves. Dragon-types also take a lot of damage from Dragon-type moves. Since it is three types that are weak to Rock-Type moves, it has 6X weakness to them and would certainly die. " Actually, I was talking about Rock Tomb, and I could just use Fly. .. " You forgot about Zekrom's misty berry. Again. I can send out Swanna if Kyurem doesn't wake up in time. " I have never heard of a Misty Berry. I would like to see proof of their existence please. "How can you be sure a Water-type would be so lucky? Also, Fusion Bolt affects all adjacent Pokemon to the user, so it would be doing double damage along with Kyurem's Outrage, and if I started the battle with both of them out, I could almost certainly kill at least 4, if not all of your Pokemon before I had to retract Kyurem. Both Outrage and Fusion Bolt are very powerful moves that affect both of an enemy's Pokemon, so if my Kyurem's Quick Claw worked, you would be in trouble. Plus, my Zekrom can paralyze your Arceus with Dragon Breath. After that, I can send out Seismitoad with partial confidence and use his Brick Break, which is super effective on Normal-Type Pokemon like Arceus. Even if you used Perish Song, my Seismoitoad's Brick Break and Zekrom's Fusion Bolt could easily kill your Arceus in less than three turns. And one last thing: even a LVL 100 Pokemon would have little health left, if any after my LVL 97 Kyurem's Outrage, which would leave it still vulnerable, even to Zekrom's Fusion Bolt. " Do you think I would be idiotic enough to send out Kyogre? "My Kyurem is LVL 97. Need you know more? " Just because he's high level doesn't mean the Devil would be afraid of him. "I could target a Pokemon that did not know fly. " True, but usually, the pokemon that didn't know fly would be one of my wallers. Conclusion: You obviously are a strong team, but I have proved that you like to insult religion (the Devil argument), and you obviously like to make stuff up just to try to make your team a threat(Misty Berries).
I would beat you in a Pokemon battle.

"Since it is part Ice, it would do normal to low damage." Actually according to http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net...(type), Ice types only have average resistance to Dragon-Type moves. Dragon-types also take a lot of damage from Dragon-type moves. Since it is three types that are weak to Rock-Type moves, it has 6X weakness to them and would certainly die. "Actually, yes it would since Kyogre and Blissey come out at the same time usually, so Blissey could use Sing to put the pokemon that would do the most damage to Kyogre to sleep." You forgot about Zekrom's misty berry. Again. I can send out Swanna if Kyurem doesn't wake up in time. "That is probably because a lvl 87 Zekrom is facing lvl 60 pokemon. Facing a lvl 100, though, it wouldn't do as much. That is 40 levels higher." How can you be sure a Water-type would be so lucky? Also, Fusion Bolt affects all adjacent Pokemon to the user, so it would be doing double damage along with Kyurem's Outrage, and if I started the battle with both of them out, I could almost certainly kill at least 4, if not all of your Pokemon before I had to retract Kyurem. Both Outrage and Fusion Bolt are very powerful moves that affect both of an enemy's Pokemon, so if my Kyurem's Quick Claw worked, you would be in trouble. Plus, my Zekrom can paralyze your Arceus with Dragon Breath. After that, I can send out Seismitoad with partial confidence and use his Brick Break, which is super effective on Normal-Type Pokemon like Arceus. Even if you used Perish Song, my Seismoitoad's Brick Break and Zekrom's Fusion Bolt could easily kill your Arceus in less than three turns. And one last thing: even a LVL 100 Pokemon would have little health left, if any after my LVL 97 Kyurem's Outrage, which would leave it still vulnerable, even to Zekrom's Fusion Bolt. And lastly, if my Kyurem's Outrage and Zekrom's Fusion Bolt were effective enough together, You would have to send out Arceus, who would probably take heavy damage from Outrage, then some more from Fusion Bolt. I would then use Dragon Breath to potentially paralyze it. If it wasn't paralyzed, it would still take severe damage overall, so I would not need more than three more turns to kill it. "I would like to see proof of that, thank you." My Kyurem is LVL 97. Need you know more? "Unless I use Fly after you use Dig..." I could target a Pokemon that did not know fly. "Plus, you forgot to refute my 4th reason in my first argument Back to you." No I did not. The 4th reason in your first argument was that most of my team was water and dragon, so Kyurem and Arceus could deal with that. I've been giving arguments constantly about how I could take out your Kyurem. Now I just need to find a scenario where I can kill Arceus. Wait... I did. Conclusion: My dragons are death machines together, you need a scenario where Perish Song succeeds to win, and then still have to worry about Swanna, who knows fly and could survive at least one attack from a badly hurt Arceus.
I would beat you in a Pokemon battle.

"I could use Outrage to eliminate enough Pokemon to force you to send out Kyurem, who, since he is both an Ice-type and a Fire-Type, would fall prey to Swanna's Rock Tomb." Since it is part Ice, it would do normal to low damage. "Aqua Ring also would not save your Kyogre from all my attacks as it only restores a little health at a time." Actually, yes it would since Kyogre and Blissey come out at the same time usually, so Blissey could use Sing to put the pokemon that would do the most damage to Kyogre to sleep. "Yes it does. It must be extremely powerful if it can do that" That is probably because a lvl 87 Zekrom is facing lvl 60 pokemon. Facing a lvl 100, though, it wouldn't do as much. That is 40 levels higher. "The devil himself would register Outrage as a threat" I would like to see proof of that, thank you. "True, but it could still save Simisage from an attack. I wouldn't need it anyway" Unless I use Fly after you use Dig... Plus, you forgot to refute my 4th reason in my first argument. Back to you.
I would beat you in a Pokemon battle.

1. "I could send out Kyerum, and Seismitoad would be useless against it, since it is Water/Ground, water does little damage to ice, and ice is super-effective against ground AND Grass, easily beating the both of them with Ice Beam/Freeze Burn."Perhaps, but just in case you went with that tactic, I would send out my Kyurem and Swanna first, because that way I could use Outrage to eliminate enough Pokemon to force you to send out Kyurem, who, since he is both an Ice-type and a Fire-Type, would fall prey to Swanna's Rock Tomb. You seem to have dropped that point. My Swanna is also LVL 96 and could probably survive as she is resistant to most of them. If it wouldn't kill your other Pokemon, it would come close. Because Kyurem is above LVL 95, his Outrage would certainly eliminate at least 2 of your Pokemon as it goes 3 consecutive times.2. "That doesn't matter..."Yes it does. It must be extremely powerful if it can do that. I could almost instantly kill your Kyogre by withdrawing my Swanna if my gut told me you were going to send it out on the next turn and your Kyogre would be doomed. Then, after that, I'd retract Zekrom (Or Kyurem if it was dazed yet) and send out Swanna. Aqua Ring also would not save your Kyogre from all my attacks as it only restores a little health at a time. 3. "If my Pokemon do survive it, your Kyurem will be confused, and Quick Claw doesn't always work."There are problems with that.1. I'd only need Quick Claw to work once to get ahead. Also, in a 6-on-6 battle, it would work at least twice.2. The devil himself would register Outrage as a threat3. Kyurem does become confused after using it, but Outrage can affect two enemies at the same time (1). That means I could eliminate 2-4 of your Pokemon, considering it goes on for three turns.4. "I don't have any Grass pokemon in my party, also, it doesn't always poison the enemy pokemon."Because if Seismitoad's ability, it could still poison one of your Pokemon.5. "Dig is utterly useless against Ice-Type pokemon, like Kyerum. And Blissey/Kyogre can easily wall this, as they both have naturally high HP."True, but it could still save Simisage from an attack. I wouldn't need it anyway. Sources: (1): http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net...(move) Your turn.
I would beat you in a Pokemon battle.

"I could send out Simisage and Seismitoad together and use Simisage's Leech Seed on one of your Pokemon, but first I would use logic to figure out which Pokemon you would attack Simisage with and attack it with Seismitoad. If I inferred that you would use them both to attack Simisage, then I could simply use Surf to damage them both. It would also damage Simisage, but not badly since he is a Grass-Type. If your water-resistant Pokemon was still alive, it wouldn't be for long because of Simisage's Leech Seed." I could send out Kyerum, and Seismitoad wouls be useless against it, since it is Water/Ground, water does little damage to ice, and ice is super-effective against ground AND Grass, easily beating the both of them with Ice Beam/Freeze Burn. "My Zekrom's Fusion Bolt has taken out Elite Four Pokemon that were not even Flying or Water types." That doesn't matter, as my pokemon are all at least 20 levels higher than the Elite 4 pokemon. "My Kyurem can take out three Pokemon in a row a lot of times with just one command to use Outrage." If my pokemon do survive it, your Kyerum will become confused, and Quick Claw doesn't always work. "My Seismitoad has Poison Jab for dealing with Grass-Type Pokemon" I don't have any Grass pokemon in my party, also, it doesn't always poison the enemy pokemon. "My Simisage can use Dig to deal with Fire and Electric-Types" Dig is utterly useless against Ice-Type pokemon, like Kyerum. And Blissey/Kyogre can easily wall this, as they both have naturally high HP. Back to you.
I would beat you in a Pokemon battle.

1. "All of my pokemon are level 100" My Kyurem holds a Quick Claw, so he could probably strike first and use Outrage, which I am certain would kill at least two of your Pokemon in a row. 2. "My Kyurem is fused with Reshiram, yours isn't fused with anything." Because my Kyurem has Outrage and a Quick Claw, I would not need to fuse it with anything. Being fused with Reshiram also pretty much leaves it falling prey to Swanna's Rock Tomb as it is now a Fire, Ice, and Dragon-Type Pokemon. 3. "...Perish Song... Would result in a tie or loss for you." Since you always send Arceus out last, you could still win without Perish Song, so it's out of the question. Arceus would also be either your last Pokemon or your better one, so I could possibly eliminate it with Kyurem. Perish song would affect your other Pokemon, so it would probably die, too. Plus, I always have more than one Pokemon at the end of the battle. 4. "Your team is mostly Water and Dragon, so Kyurem and Arceus can easily deal with these." My Kyurem could eliminate yours by striking first with its Quick Claw, which would foil a key part of your strategy. Now all I have to do is find a scenario in which I can defeat your Arceus. 5.1: "Blissey can put an enemy to sleep," My Swanna or Zekrom could dodge it with Fly. If I were lucky, I would have them both out, so I could aim them both at Blissey, having a higher chance of knocking her out and thus possibly foiling yet another part of your strategy. They would also hold Misty Berries just in case they couldn't go first. 5.2: "If Blissey and Kyogre were out, Blissey could put the enemy to sleep while Kyogre restores HP with Aqua Ring. Obviously, I would want to put the one that's most effective on Kyogre to sleep, so that would be Simisage or Kyerum." You're forgetting about Kyurem's Quick Claw and my other Pokemons' Misty Berries. 5.3: "But, if you have both in, I could send out Bannete/Arceus to poison them, and Simisage would take massive damage to it, since Poison is super effective against grass." I could also use Seismitoad, who would also hold a Misty Berry, to protect Simisage (Aldo holding a Misty Berry) with Surf, which would do little damage to a Grass Type. Simisage could Also have used Dig first, allowing him to avoid your Poison-Type moves. Your Turn.