Pennington is NOT a genuine believer & Story book jebus was an eternal Jew!

Pro seems to think he has some how corrected me but this correction is illegitimate. Pro never offers one link or source to show that my understanding is flawed. We are left with just Pros interpretation which is not a regular or viewed legitimate. I offered the definition of 'Abideth', this definition shows by the first and second meaning that Christians are to wait. We are to wait for perfection by the return of Jesus Christ. Pro is correct that a Christian must cease in a sinful lifestyle. Pro has never shown that I actually live a sinful lifestyle, this is critical for Pros case. To commit a sin is not the same as actually living a sinful lifestyle. To live a sinful lifestyle you must incorporate sin into all facets of your life. Everyone makes errors in their life, because someone makes a error doesn't mean that error defines them. If someone kills someone by accident, are they a murderer? If someone tells a lie, are they considered a liar their whole life? Same-so a Christian does commit errors that result in sin but that doesn't mean that they live a sinful lifestyle. Pro fails. I furthermore accept that I must accept all Biblical doctrine without objection. I have never objected to any Biblical doctrine. My opponent has not shown that I do reject Biblical doctrine or that I object any Biblical doctrine. Pro fails. To conclude this part, my opponent used 1 John alot to make his point, well lets look further at what 1 John says about sin. 1 John 1:8-10 King James Version (KJV) "8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us. " So we see that if we do deny that we are sinful then also reject the scripture. Therefore my past rounds on this topic agrees with this passage. A Christian is still sinful but instead blameless of that sin in the eyes of God. Pro fails. Pro gives us the verses in Deut. 24:16 & Ezek. 18:20 to support his case. He did not post them for us to read so I will. Deuteronomy 24:16 King James Version (KJV) "16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin. " I agree and this has no substance in this debate and if it does, Pro never tells us why as we see in the next one also. Ezekiel 18:20 King James Version (KJV) "20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him. " These two verses is saying that each person is accountable for their won actions and decisions. We are not held accountable for our fathers or ancestors. Those that sin will receive their reward and those that are righteous shall also receive their reward. This also is O. T. doctrine which is before Jesus Christ. To find salvation and forgiveness of sin changes once Jesus Christ sacrifices himself and therefore any point my opponent tries to make here is mute. He never tells us his point BTW. Pro fails. We can see that Christians are Christians because they trust in God and believe His Word. Because of this belief they are rendered blameless in the sight of God, they are without sin to God. That doesn't mean we are sinless unto men or upon the earth. Pro furthermore contradicts himself by saying, "Indeed 1 John 3:6 doesn't claim a genuine believer must be ' perfect ' but what it does do, is show that a genuine believer ' MUST NO LONGER SIN! " If someone no longer sinned then that would mean they are perfect. Pro fails. Pro also says there is no reference to blameless in the scriptures but I disagree. Philippians 2:15 King James Version (KJV) "15 That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world. " Luke 1:6 King James Version (KJV) "6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless. " We can see here that the very argument I am making is verified in two different books. This on top of the fact that 1 John also say we are all sinful. Why would we be blameless if we did not do something that could be considered blameful? Pro fails. Pro talks about me dancing around to other verses, well, yes I do. This topic is about Biblical doctrine and do I live it and believe it. This is not reduced to one passage or book but the entire Biblical doctrine. My opponent is very disingenuous in his Biblical references. He then rejects the scriptures I posted before and after the passage that he supplied that, He, suggest we must give all we have. Clearly Jesus is talking to a rich man who wanted to know how to receive salvation and Jesus tells him to give all he has, why? Because this man cherished his belongings more than God. Jesus then explains that anyone who holds their belongings higher than God then they should get rid of them and put God as their highest treasure. This does apply to all rich & poor but if one is poor, what does he have to give or to cherish? Nothing but God. Pro never offers a source or reference to his understanding. Pro just uses his own interpretation and view. Pro fails. Onward to Jesus being a eternal Jew. Jesus is the Word of God as shown here: John 1 King James Version (KJV) John 1:14, "14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. " So, Jesus is the Word of God. When was the Word created? John 1:1 "1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. " So, the Word was with God in the Beginning, therefore saying that Jesus was around since the beginning. Where Jews around in the beginning? No, they were not. If Jesus was around in the beginning and Jews weren't, means that Jesus can not be a eternal Jew. Jews are not eternal as Jesus is. Jesus was born in the Jewish culture and He was a Jew on earth. Jesus came and offered another way for the Jews, which was Christianity. To be a Jew you either must be from Jerusalem or from the religion Judaism. Jesus was not from Jerusalem and He started a new religion called Christianity therefore ceasing Himself being in Judaism. My opponent never shows us that our earthly heretiage moves on into the afterlife. Nor does he show that Jesus was a Jew since the beginning of time. Jesus was before the Jews and therefore He is the same then and today. Pro fails. CONCLUSION: Pro never gives us any real references to his resolution. He never offers any sourced interpretation that conflicts with mine. He simply gives us unaware, uneducated, and UnBiblical interpretations that are irrelevant. He could never show that I am not living as a Christian. He could not show that I have possessions that I hold higher than God. He could not show that Jesus was a Jew before the creation of the earth or that He remained a Jew after death. Pro failed to show much of anything other than he as little knowledge in Biblical matters. VOTING: Argument: Pros argument failed miserably. I rebutted all his claims with more than satisfactory means. Spelling/Grammar: I did miss-spell and used bad grammar. Sources: I was the only one who used sources that applied to the debate. Pro only sourced that Jesus was born on earth as a Jew. Conduct: Pro had terrible conduct. I was not fantastic myself but far more respectful than Pro. Pro used insults throughout the debate and never once showed respect for his competitor. Thank You!