Religion Science and Philosophy should not be separated, they all point to a common and real truth.

Well that is a lot more then I expected to respond to, but suppose I will haft to rise to the occasion. First of all I'm not nearly as smart as you so bear with me. I didn't mean religion in the way you used it I'm afraid. When I said religion I did in no way mean that all religions were true or agreed. I meant religion as in the constant struggle to find the true religion and studie it to find the answers to the big questions in life. If that makes sense, not to say that all religion is one but rather to use the word as another area of study like science and Philosophy. The picture I am trying to paint is this. Science is what is true philosophy is looking for what is true, like you said, but science is also looking for truth. In fact science as of late has crossed the boundary into religion with the theory of evolution. Evolution disagrees with the concept of God and a creator. You see science in its pursuit of finding the origins of life has started stepping on religions feet. And philosophy is also trying to find the answer to it all. Like 3 runners in a race, the problem is that the runners are not running in the same direction and really shouldn't be competing but rather helping each other to make it to there goal. Religion, in this case I'm saying Christianity, thinks they have the answer. But in order to prove it they need science and philosophy. But people seem to insist that if you believe in science that you cant possibly be religious. Almost like there both true. Do you see what I'm getting at? Either the science is wrong or the religion is wrong, people cant go around saying that one dose not apply to the other. In fact they need each other to really make headway. You cant just say that "its science" as if it being somewhat scientific means it must be true and somehow trumps religion. Ill be honest I'm on Gods side here, its just ridicules to me that some people say "I believe in science" and others "I believe in religion" as if because you believe in one the other doesn't apply anymore. When they both need to agree in order to make progress, I'm not saying you should mix evolution and Christianity, I don't believe in evolution for the record. But you cannot say that in science there is no God. Because he's the God of science as well as philosophy or he is not God. And science philosophy and everything points to him. they haft to because god is the source. Why cant science express ideas that are somewhat religious by looking at creation, or philosophical? And why can't religion express ideas that seem scientific? And really all pursuits of knowledge should be heading toward the sores of all knowledge, which is God. But we all insist on going our own way instead of focusing on what really matters. Just like men I guess. And when I talked about people thinking of truth as relative I didn't really mean any specific truth at that time. What I meant is that people tend to think of evolution being true for science and religion having its own truth. Which of cores would mean that real truth doesn't exist. "truth" itself not any specific truth. But I think you and I both believe in truth. Really I don't care about winning any stupid debate. What matter to me is, can you see where I'm coming from? (PS: lets leave Islam out of this, the last thing we wont to do is piss "Them" off)