The Christian God probably does not exist

Con did not address my arguments. Also I suspect Con is Plagiarising. If you type her 1st round into a Plagiarism checker, her argument appears to be verbatim or close to it. Also, it is odd she has a kinda scientific 1st round, but an utterly ridiculous 2nd round. C1:On Prophecy: Con argues from vague prophecy, which is nongermane to the debate. Con says: "I mean maybe after 1000 years in a place you live will be born a man named John. But how can you know it ? There's no way to guess it correctly, somebody has to told you. Somebody who knows and it has to be a higher person cause there's no way for a simple human to know it. That's how Bible defends itself from being fake."So Con says there is a zero percent chance that I can't guess that a John shall exist in a 1000 years. Really? There are 5,228,792 people in the U.S. with the first name John. Statistically the 2nd most popular first name. 99.63 percent of people with the first name John are male. I'm relatively sure if I guessed a John will be born in 1000 year's i'd probably be right.Of course I can't be 100% sure, but there is no way to know that the biblical authors were 100& sure. C1.B: circulus in probando and petitio principii Con is basically arguing as follows:P1) The bible is trueP2) The bible says the bible is trueC) The bible is true.She does not adequately defend the P1C2: The Devil:The Devil is a figure in all Abrahamic religions. So I don't see your point.Latin/Tunges: First, it's a non-sequitur to say god or Christianity is true due to people spouting unintelligble non-sense. Second, this can be neurologically addressed as a drop in frontal lobe activity and caudate activity.'C3: argumentum ad ignorantiamCon says:"My position is so easy, I can say on everything "God made that happen". This is not at all convincing or rational. KCA: "Everything which has a beginning has a cause. The universe has a beginning. Therefore the universe has a cause." NO.This is a terribly presumptuous argument.A) Everything that begins to exist has a causeB) The universe began to existC) The universe has a causeD) That cause is godIt presumes1. Everything non-eternal has a cause2. The universe has a cause3. The universe has a supernatural causeAssumption1 is false. In quantum physics particles come in and out of existence with no cause. Further more something comes from nothing, this is demonstrated by experiments regarding the Casmir effect.Assumption 2 might be true. I will elaborate on axiom two in my discussion of plausible cosmological models.Assumption 3 is so absurd that it ISN'T EVEN FALSE. One could never know if the universe has the transcendent cause; it isn't even testable.This violates Occam's razor.If it is true everything has a cause and the universe has a cause, then why can' the universe be the cause of its self.Saying the universe has a transcendent cause raises unneeded questions that CAN'T EVER BE ANSWERED.Assumption 3 does not follow from 1 and 2.(I didn't discuss premise B, because it's probably true, but it is not necessarily true. There are eternal models.Cosmological Models In Which God Is Unneeded: -The Oscillating UniverseThis is a self-contained model in which the universe evolves from a big bang, then expands and expands and then collapses upon it's self and then re-expands. This model is perfectly self-contained and no god is needed. -Hartle HawkingI really like this one because the universe has a begining but no cause. QET:-Any universe that is described by quantum mechanics with non-zero energy and a time independent Hamiltonian is eternal in both arrows of time.Ekpyrotic Universe: "...our current universe arose from a collision of two three-dimensional worlds (branes) in a space with an extra (fourth) spatial dimension."The point isn't that any of these are the right model, rather that there are self contained models.Multiverse- 1. Let's visit the multiverse. The multiverse is a natural consequence of inflation. Via BICEP2 Primordial gravitation waves have been detected, which is almost indisputable proof of inflation.Inflation accounts for the:1.Uniformity. The cosmic background radiation is quite uniform. Inflation adequately accounts for the uniformity. A uniform region expanded rapidly, evolving into our visible universe.2. Mass density. Inflation predicts the omega should 1. The Planck satellite measures the omega as 1, which means our universe should be flat, which it is.3.Small non-uniformity. The small non-uniformity in the universe is easily accounted for by quantum fluctuations, which have been observed in the CBR.As explained the multiverse is a consequence of inflation. All the other predictions have come true. I would say that would constitute a good reason to think the multiverse is true.Via inflation, some parts of the early universe expanded more than other, created bublbles of space time, which later developed into other universes, and our universe is just a bubble universe and requires no creator just a prior universe. The multiverse can be eternal.Multiverse And Life Permiting Parameters:All the "fine tuning" con described can be explained through the multiverse. If there are an infinite amount of universes then some of them are bound to have life permitting parameters.On Design: -More on the watch maker and design:Now the watch maker argument assumes design is an apparent attribute one would assume.If there's a watch, someone who knows what a watch is would infer design, but one with no concept of a watch, would most likely conclude that the watch is naturally there.Also how do you come to the conclusion the universe is designed. We have not experienced other universes to compare it to.With the argument from design you encounter an infinite regression.If anything with intelligence comes from prior intelligence, then god must have been designed. Is god not intelligent?It is absurd to argue everything intelligent comes from prior intelligence but the most intelligent being conceivable doesn't.Sources: http://wwwphy.princeton.edu...http://space.mit.edu... http://arxiv.org... http://www.universetoday.com... http://web.uvic.ca... http://www.preposterousuniverse.com... http://www.scientificamerican.com... http://www.scientificamerican.com...