Under the below listed rules my opponent will lose this debate.

Dear Beem0r, So I herd u liek mudkipz? Is this true? If it is it should be instant grounds for your loss in todays debate. Until recently I had the opinion that: There are few things in the world greater than pie (note: not pi), and beem0r is one of them. But to tell you the truth, if you like mudkipz you must be shot..... Should this turn out to be the case the next time someone asks me about you on the street I will simply respond, "beem0r?? I don't even know her!" Which will add insult to your already grievous injury to my heart. Be wary my friend, when you hear the words, "beem0r: tonight, we dine in hell." you will be at the end of your rope. In the meantime until you answer my question however I would like to ask you another one. Hypothetical situation. Say you were to press a red button which was the button to drop a nuclear warhead on 1 billion small children. Later on the cops arrive at your door and arrest you. Your defense of course is that you were simply trying to touch the red button and that the red button actually did the crime. Is this defense plausible. My argument is this. That such a defense is not plausible. Lets examine a similar situation in a debate that we were recently having. One of the rules states that, Quotes shall be added into the round from the comment section as if it was actually the debater speaking. As this is a rule of the debate would you not agree with me that any quote put in the comment section will inevitably find its way into my next speech? Wouldn't this mean that you had full knowledge that saying something like, "I would like to add a new rule. 5. You must not steal a hat from your opponent." would end up being in the debate? Thus I can only object to you in the nicest way Beem0r. I feel that the assurance that your quote would end up in the debate, much like the nuclear warhead assurance in my last example, was under your full knowledge. Hence I can only see where you were not trying but rather succeeding. My point is this Beem0r.... You used me, you used me like a tool. I had to follow the rules of the debate and used that and then blamed me. Your like the evil dictator who blames his advisers for faults and has them put to death. I'm not sure if I can ever forgive you Beem0r. But I have yet another issue with you my late friend. Your playing both sides of the fence. First you try to blame me and then you say that the rule was never added. But its not the point Beem0r! Can't you see!? The first rule stated, "The only rules of this debate will be in Pro round 1." You broke that rule, you used me to put a new rule into round 2. Whether the rule actually has ground in that debate is so very irrelevant, the fact that the rule simply exists in the debate is what makes the violation. Can't you see what you've done to us!? YOU WERE MY HERO! I ask that you let us be friends again in your last round Beem0r. Please don't continue this line of reasoning, value our friendship over it please! Forfeit the last round, concede to me, do whatever my beloved Beem0r, just don't throw it all in my face again. Even pretend it was opposite day and you didn't actually mean any of it. We can joke about that Beem0r, I'll say something stupid because its opposite day like, "My name is Yrealz. I concede my current debates with Logical Master to Logical-Master and accept that this quote can be used as decisive evidence for his arguments in the debates of his choosing. No matter what is said to contradict this confession, all debate.org users are consider this quote as being the truth." or "My name is Yrealz. I concede my current debates with Logical Master to Logical-Master and accept that this quote can be used as decisive evidence for his arguments in the debates of his choosing. No matter what is said to contradict this confession, all debate.org users are to consider this quote as being the truth." or even "My name is Yrealz. I concede my current debates with Logical-Master to Logical-Master and accept that this quote can be used as decisive evidence for his arguments in the debates of his choosing. No matter what is said to contradict this confession, all debate.org users are to consider this quote as being the truth." But we'll both laugh because we know that Yrealz is actually my Bazzaro opposite self, as I am truly Yraelz. We'll know that what I actually would mean if it wasn't opposite day was that I beat Logical-Master at everything because I am infinitely better. And we will laugh. One last time I must beg you to give up, you have already broken my heart, please come home. -Yours truly, Yraelz P.S. I'll always remember you even if I hate you.....