That women need men like fish need bicycles

Hi. I'm in a bad mood cause after the three day weekend I got sick and I am still sick. Also one of my speeches accedetally got deleted so I'm moderatly pis....well you know. It has been fun. K, here I go...now... "My logical conclusion is that in the past we have removed potential dangers from medical procedures. I therefore suggest that, it is possible the risks are removed." Well it has been mathmatically proven that 2 2=4. However no one can figure out the value of pi. 3.141592654 something something...anways just because something else has been proven, doesn't mean that the current issue can be solved. Besides, we are looking at the here and now, not the far-off future. "The truth is, I don't have to agree with the ethics behind the issue for the issue to still be relevant." I think I get your drift. So if the Affirmative thinks that the ethics are wrong, I don't think he/she would do it. So would that be the end of mankind if no one did it? Or womankind...whatever =) "The negative has also stated that, "Women are capable at doing these things [military and construction]. But is this the desire of all women? No." Well of course. No one's disputing that fact. Truth be told, you're also going to find a lot of men who do not want to do that either. In a society where only women would exist, you would need a balance of women who want to defend and construct, and those who which to nurture in the home. I feel I can therefore safely say that, on this point at least, the affirmative has proven why men are not needed, and the negative has not shown otherwise." If that is the case, then why can't we say that men don't need women? They can do the jobs better because they are biologically proven to be faster, stronger, and better. Resulting in a better society- a better world. (Horray for copy and paste!) "True. However, without men in the world, this is one more conflict to be removed from the world. " One less conflict that could create many more. Such as the need for sex. Yes, the NEED for sex. I don't think lesbians have the same parts as a man...well, some might. (Pardon me!) Yeah, my case was centered around equality. Women fought for it, in particular, to become considered as equal as a man. It is clear that many women believe in equality. Besides, women can never have 'brotherhood'. (Play on words. Heh) "However, simply put, those ideas will hold, if not even more so, with only women in the world." How in the world can the idea of equality hold when men are considered inferior? How long will it be before the further subdivide themselves as human beings and establish Hitler's guidelines of a perfect world? After all, they are only trying to perfect the world, right? If they can rid men, why not the imperfect women? Mass genocide, war- you get the picture. I'm not saying this may not happen, I'm just saying it's a possibility. Excuse the many hypothetical questions. I'm giddy today. "The negative was also placed with the burden of proving why men are needed in the world. However, the negative seems to believe that by simply rebutting my arguments, this will then come together." I established my simple case in the beginning and have succesfully rebutted all of your points, making them void. So if I successfully rebut the points and my case still stands, I believe I should win the votes. "It's not about how equal we are in society or how we should all be equal. It is about necessity, and through my case it should be clear, men are not necessary." We could eliminate all of the unnessicary things in the world, but then we would only be existing on nothing but the idea of existing. Or we could enjoy life (which I personally belive is the point of life). Thanks for a great debate man. Please vote NEG.