Jon Stewart vs. Stephen Colbert

Alrighty then lets finish this up. A) Cursing" John Stewart, in my count of cursing from my own study called The Bad Comedian study, which was held over a one month period, cursed about 3.8 times more than Stephen Colbert did"Well thats interesting because in my own study that I held called "The I-dont-give-a-f*ck Study", I found that not only do I not give a f*ck, but I found that Stewart cursed 1000x less than Colbert and proved that Colbert worships satan. If you cant see past my trolling, my point was that without sources, both of our "studies" dont mean anything and dont prove anything either. I showed solid evidence showing that Colbert does curse quite a lot compared to Stewart, so the argument that they are any different is defeated. B) Stewart and Colbert make equal numbers of sex referencesConcededC) Colbert owns a Super-PacArguing that Colbert is better then Stewart because he owns a Super-Pac is a moot point because Super-Pacs are just arbitrary measures that dont mean anything when it comes down to defining who is better. If I argued that Stewart is better then Colbert because Stewart owns a mercedes and Colbert does not, even though he can easily get one, that doesnt make Stewart better Colbert. The same would be true if Stewart owned a Super-Pac and COlbert didnt, or vice versa. D) The Daily Shows superior Emmy countMy opponents completely dismissed the fact that The Daily Show has won 17 more Emmy's than the Colbert Report, and his response to the Daily Show beating the Colbert Report 6 times in a row for the same award was "they havent won it yet! ". This still doesnt change anything and thus the fact stands that the Daily Show under Stewarts presence has been far more critically praised and acclaimed then the Colbert Report under Colbert. E) Daily Show gets 25% more viewers then the Colbert ReportWhen presented with the fact that the Daily Show gets way more viewers then the Colbert Report, Pro simply offered an excuse that the reason this happens is because people universally go to sleep right when his show is about to come on at 11:30. However, the Pro seems to not notice that numerous late night shows hosted by Conan O'Brian, Jay Leno, David Letterman, Jimmy Fallon, and Jimmy Kimmel, regularly stretch past the 11:30 mark and still put up numbers comparable to that of the Colbert Report. http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com...Sleep evidently does not affect TV viewership at all since numerous other late night shows regularly air past 11:30 and still put up better numbers then the Colbert Report, so the argument that Colbert is better then Stewart and that the reason he has lower ratings due to people going to sleep is completely invalid. F) Stewart's bigger salaryConceded (but still this point doesnt necessarily mean anything unless the voters think it does)G) Correspondants. "Something else wrong with that statement is that he does have interns that come on his show"Ones that he regularly mistreats and claims that they are unpaid. .. .. http://www.colbertnation.com...Also, see video above. . http://www.youtube.com...Colbert has interns and is a dick to them, many people dont even know the names of the interns. Stewart on the other hand has numerous correspondents who he lets have their won segments on his show which allows them to rise to fame, and Colbert was one of those people. Colbert got his fame from being someone elses co-worker, and now that hes famous he sure hasnt returned the favor or allowed others to take the same path to glory. This I think is a valid argument for why Stewart is better then Colbert both in terms of the shows they host, and the selflessness of Stewart compard to Colbert. H) More famous guests appear on the Daily Show then the Colbert ReportIn respons to me listing dozens of famous and powerful politicians who have changed the course of world history, the Pro responded by saying "Colbert is using this to make people more famous. Plus, he did have Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) and Fun. (a popular band today"Number 1, I challenge voters and the Pro alike to try to think of one person who became famous solely because they appeared on the Colbert Report. I couldnt think of a single person and if you cant either then alreay this argument has little merit. 2, Daniel Radcliffe not only has no significant impact on world history compared to people who have been on the Daily Show, but nonetheless, Daniel Radcliffe has also appeared on the Daily Show too. And 3, I guarantee you that 98% of Americans have no idea who the band "Fun" is. .. . The point thus stands that Stewart has more famous guests on his show then Colbert. I) The Rally to Restore Sanity vs the Rally to Keep Fear Alive"That was not Colbert's fault. He couldn't get in for whatever reason it was. "Stewart and Colbert both work for the same channel under the same provider and have much of the same staff working for their shows, so it can be concluded that one of the only reasons that only one of them could get a permit for the rally while the other could not has something to do with the character of both of them. That being said, this point was also meant to emphasize how Stewart let Colbert control part of his own rally which again refers back to Stewarts selflessness and Colberts shelfish-ness.