It is Possible to Prove God Exists

This is so bizarre; I would have said the exact same thing a week ago.My arguments are simple:1) Gravity certainly exists 100%2) Gravity is illogical3) God can exist 100% certainty1) People do not recognize the world as existing without a god2) The evidence, to them, shows that the god exists3) Therefore, based on perception, it is 100% proven that the a god exists._____________________________________________________________________________________Argument 1:1) Gravity certainly exists 100%My opponent likely agrees. 2) Gravity is illogicalBelieve it or not, gravity is not fully explained. Sure, we can observe gravity (what goes up comes down). However, science doesn't have all the laws of gravity figured out.We don't have a theory for Quantum Gravity. The singularity found at the center of a blackhole is not understood. Science does not have an explanation of how gravity works in an infinitely small space.The singularity at the center of the Big Bang is not fully understood. Quantum Mechanics cannot account for sub-subatomic gravity.String Theorists are called to work on these problems and to hopefully create a Unified Theory of Everything. So far, they have not succeeded.When Albert Einstein saw the possibility for singularities to exist inside his model of gravity, he claimed that Blackholes don't exist. Since the '90s, it has been a recognised fact that blackholes exist. Science has been confused eversince.God can exist 100%As you've seen, gravity does not work with the same logic that most scientific phenomenons do. Gravity is completely fine on the Macro-scale, but when you get to basic levels, there is no consensus on how gravity exists.Gravity, unlike a god, exists even though it cannot be explained. Or perhaps, gravity exists on the large-scale, and not on the small-scale. Maybe a god keeps things together on the small scale.Until there is a proven theory, God is gravity. This theory is not disproven.That is not an Argument of Ignorance. My point is, God existing as gravity is as valid a hypothesis as gravity exists because neither possibility is completely understood or disproven.Why is it that God doesn't exist? You could say that gravity is observable. I myself haven't observed anything of the sort. The closest thing I've observed to that is something falling down.Now, theres this God-dude; the guy down the street says he observes it. I am as inclined to believe him as I am to believe you about gravity existing.But gravity exits, does it not? I'm done pretending like I don't believe in gravity. My point was: if gravity is proven, why is god not?_____________________________________________________________________________________Argument 21) People do not recognise the world as having no godMy opponent probably agrees that some people believe in a god.2) To them, evidence points to the existence of a godThis is fairly obvious. They believe that the evidence supports them. A plethora of creationists believe "God" to be a scientific truth.3) Based on their perception, God is 100% provenHumans are creatures of perception. They perceive that their views are true, obviously. The question becomes: "Are their perceptions invalid?". The answer, I say is no.I think that their perceptions are as valid as yours. You could claim their perceptions are wrong, but how do we know that yours aren't?Because of ones perceptions it CAN be 100% proven that God exists to at least one person.