Dennis Kucinich is the only Democratic presidential candidate who can beat a Republican in 2008.

where to begin.... Will you please enlighten me and tell me how Obama is a flip-flopper? I see that's what you're getting at, but you just don't have your ducks in a row. Obama has opposed the war from the get-go. He voted against it. GEORGE W. BUSH got us into the war. At the beginning when we first went over there, he voted not to go. NOW I believe what you're talking about is at the beginning of the war, funding it. He is quoted as saying: "Once we were in, we were going to have some responsibility to try to make it work as best we can," the presidential candidate said. "More importantly, you make sure the troops are supported. I don't think there's any contradiction there whatsoever. We should not get in; once we were in, we had to make the best of a bad situation." -Barack Obama He supported giving our troops resources. Not the war. And now, that the war has been going on and on with no end in sight, he has proposed plans to get us out, voted against George Bush's sanction ideas and "blank check" requests, etc.... There is no contradiction. Also, his plan includes all combat troops out by March 31, 2008. Not 2013. It's as though you either have "forgotten" or simply DO NOT KNOW that Obama introduced the Iraq War De-escalation Act of 2007. The Iraq War De-escalation Act of 2007 is binding and comprehensive legislation that not only reverses the President's dangerous and ill-conceived escalation, but also sets a new course for U.S. policy in Iraq that can bring a responsible end to the war and bring our troops home. It implements - with the force of law - a phased redeployment of U.S. forces that remains our best leverage to pressure the Iraqi government to achieve the political solution necessary to promote stability. And just for the record, I believe Obama as a Church of Christ member will have more support from Christians than Kucinich, who is 100% for the legalization of marijuana AND is married to a woman half his age, also claims to have seen "UFO's"....I don't disagree with any of these things. I actually support Kucinich in all of these things. HOWEVER EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS WON'T. Kucinich will not be able to handle the evangelical movement based on his ideas of "peace" anymore than any other candidate could. They all advocate peace and oppose this war, exception (if any) being Hilary Clinton for favoring sanctions in Iran. Watch Obama's speeches and tell me people are bored with him. HA! Even if he doesn't win, he will go down as being enthusiastic and eliciting hope from Americans again. He gets a crowd "fired up!" and "ready to go!" (IF you don't know what I'm talking about, you shouldn't be here because you don't have enough background on the debate...) NEVER have we had the opportunity to see a woman, a latino, and a black man so on the verge of being president, and the nation is excited (some negatively, some positively) about it, to say the least. If anything, Edwards and Kucinich are the ones the nation isn't as excited about, which is why they're not being talked about and not as high up in the polls....people are amazed that America is ready for this. I think you should learn a little more about Obama prior to talking about him in a negative light.