Fame shouldnt be so accesible.

My opponent Firstly starts her argument by giving her brief introduction on what she sees Fame is. My opponent disagrees that you get famous for " anything" she explains to be known in today's society or even briefly recognised you need to be involved with someone who " is" Famous ( has a relative/friend who is popular amongst being famous), involved in a scandal of some sort. etc she goes on to explain. I ask my opponent this she states " You get famous for doing or accomplishing something" Which is exactly my point!.. You have list everyday you can be seen in the eye of the media.. for ego: Jackass, Just making a complete fool of yourself on camera can make you millions! The guys who presented them self Our global and in global stars!... . Which is basically my point, the more people out to make hysteria amongst the public is the more accessible ones to go far in the industry. So what's my point?>< My opponent clarify that I haven't made a negative explanation about what I think gives fame the negative aura, My opponent states that the paparazzi and public are the ones that keep these celebrity's upbraid and on our tv, magazines etc, We make money off these people who have there" claim to fame" ..We spend more than 30q$ a week to souvenir and pay there fame, The public gives a person fame, What negative issues I have, is seeing for eg someone from the big brother house having a scandal and rather hearing the sucess or stories about The real heroic, succesful stars we are bashed with people just like ourselves Who have suddenly made themself become famous by bieng briefly on tv, Statisctically we are spending our money on these reality tv shows by sucking up to the media. My opponent then goes on re-elaborate the statment I made about " MeganFox, She also says " who cares who she compares herself to?" Obviously to be printed on over 6 magazines covers The media declorates alot of people to care!, Of course there is no real violation but the whole concept of someone Who tries to be a "rip off jolie clon" Is only just angered the media public, We dont want to see people on the magazines who May be angered by the fact someone is stripping off for a living and been in only a few tv films, is Comparing some may see as there idol " Angelina jolie" There is alot of benefits to fame Im not ruling this out, You making alot of money and a good career , But Fame consquently gives people Arrogance, Not only this is manipulates there Fame, Its humilating to see a paparazi who ridicules for eg " brittany murphy for wearing a dress thats to small",This gives people negative views about how the media exploits young celebritys and also How Fame can dammage someones career. <> This goes on to explain not only people who want to get famous, but the paparazi and People who may envy or ridicule these celebs, Rather than having an eyes view on what the celebrity may be up to, what next film there going to be in " etc we are bombarded.. About brittanys next scandal, about Jessicas albas " Love affair", We are not just looking at celebriteys , we are looking about people who have bieng exploited and who constantly have to make defense mechanisms for there actions. Con states what My criteria for fame should be, Its not what i would see as a criteria but what i would see is new and different, if someone has a reconsible talent of course they should be popular amongst public and have there fame...I think people should be famous for bieng Talented entertaining, different, mysterious maybe... Not just the same old crap of people who have been on a relatity Tv show, Im not going to deny this is of course of an intrest to the public eye.. but not after 3 months and seeing them trying to hang on to there fame by re-claiming it and bieng on a new tv show or Trying to make it into the music and acting industry... These people only go far because the industry allows them to, they enjoy making money of there implimented , downfalls, scandals etc, So if we are allowing people like this into it, Where is all the real talent?, We are overpopulating the music, acting industry by letting naieve ammatures take the spotlight, Rather than people who have d worked on this. So my arguement stands as this Fame shouldnt be so accesible,We shouldnt let people who have made minor sucess, in reality tv etc overpopulate the music, singing acting industry, Furthermore Why should it be a concern to me?, To be honest its a subject I have taken lightly and done my research its About people who have tried to hard to become worldwide known but is setback, my ammatures that steal that spotlight, that is one of my major frustration about the media. Im not ruling out FAME , I do enjoy reality tv and entertainment shows, but i dont want to see them trying to setting there standards to high and trying to become worlwide, when there is other talented people who have that chance!. Who is to blame?..- Simply put the Media! exploiting and manipulating peoples Hopes! I say this to con, who explains "its ok if nobody gets hurt" , All celebriteys worlwide succesful or not! constantly read about negative statements about themself, its basic " Fame". So that is getting hurt , exploited..They have to live with it! --I will provide sources on our last Arguement So we can abreviate and analyse both pro and Con --