The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is historically probable

First there is an issues I would like to clear up. One could justify something being historically probably based on inaccurate historical evidence, so I ask my opponent to demonstrate that his sources of evidence are indeed true (not based on his or anyone else's opinions but on provable facts). I am arguing that there is no accurate historical evidence that the resurrection of christ occurred. I will now use an analogy to justify my reasoning: Imagine you are reading a scripture, from which a faith is based. The scripture claims that it alone is the one truth. It contains many fascinating tales and the language is beautiful and inspiring. You are in awe at this work and are inclined to believe it's truth. Now, you come across a parable about sea travellers, sailing the oceans in search of new land. Their mission brings great joy and pride from their home land. But now, it is told that the men awoke one morning to a loud thunder-like noise and a dark cloud rose over them. They felt their boat shaking turbulently on the raging waters. The boat is torn apart and the men are in abject terror, as they try desperately to swim away. One by one, the men fall the edge of the Earth into the abyss. The last man is about to fall, his head leaning over the edge, the view of hell staring into his eyes. Then the man feels himself rising upwards and away from the edge. He hears the voice of God from the cloud above, telling him he has been spared. He is ordered to go back to his land and tell everyone of the story and to warn them never to travel on oceans again. The man is transported by God to his home land and warns his family and friends. The word spreads and soon everyone is aware. The story may be beautifully written, poignant and indeed consequential. There maybe a moral behind it. To a monk from the middle ages, it may be inspiring and convincing. We face a problem however. We have unequivocal evidence that the Earth is spherical and falling off the edge is not possible. However beautiful the story may be, we can be certain that it is false, as we know that the premise it is built on is definitely wrong. The same reasoning can be applied to the story of the resurrection of christ. It may well be beautifully written and arouse intense emotion to its readers. It may symbolise moral views, it may inspire great good in the world and indeed it has. The story may well bring joy and inspiration to people around the world, who find its prodigious message moving. However, like in my tale of the sea travellers, we encounter a problem. In the 21st century, we have a very extensive knowledge of the laws of physics and the workings of biology. We know that humans cannot magically rise from the dead, especially after the horrific death suffered by Jesus, in which he would have lost a lot of blood and suffocated. This involves a direct violation of everything we know about science. It cannot possibly be true, under the same principle that men cannot fall of the edge of the world; we have unequivocal evidence to the contrary and none whatsoever in support. Words can be written in such a way to be greatly inspiring, it does not imply that there content is true. It is not rational to hold words on paper in higher esteem than the laws of physics, to which we owe our very existence. My opponent is interested to know what other explanations there could be for the events that occurred on Easter morning. I would first like to point out that this is based on the unwarranted assumption that the accounts we have of that morning are accurate, not contrived or ambiguous or even honestly wrong. Whatever the consequences of the supposed resurrection were can be considered incidental with respect to this argument. The resurrection violates unequivocal facts and it therefore not reasonable to believe it to be true. Whatever led to the consequences cannot be attributed to a genuine resurrection, due to its impossibility. The truth, whatever it may be, is certainly not this. I find it astounding how people just cannot understand this, or indeed refuse to. The laws of physics cannot be blatantly suspended for the desires of anyone in any circumstances. Not ever. No resurrections or virgin births or ascensions to heaven. No conversations with God up mountains. These things did not happen for the simple reason that they cannot physically have happened. I make no apologies is smashing that chestnut with a sledgehammer. It is an important point that needs to be acknowledged. Imagine our horror if a police investigation concluded, for example, that a murder suspect had magically flow off to a far away land, based on received messages. I think they probably (indeed hopefully) draw the line at the laws of physics.