Unborn human beings should have a legal right to live.

Hello I would like to thank the opponent for his response, I apologize if any of my comments we're pejorative but I wasn't the only one my opponent states how he wasn't expecting such a bad argument from me which as well is pejorative. So the opponent as well did not obey his regulations, I will now start to put forward some rebuttals. "The number of woman dying from illegal abortions was around 200-500 annually." - Bernard Nathanson.The opponent nor Bernard seem to understand that with better treatment for abortions through medical attention the chances of woman dying are really low. While doing it illegal woman still run a much bigger chance of death, it doesn't matter if the number of woman dying from illegal abortions is ten million or simply one it's still a death we can prevent by treating them thoroughly. This link I will provide it's but a taste of the pain woman seeking abortions went through.[1]"Dandruff is part of a whole human being." It is true that a fetus is the result of two human parents. (I will not call a fetus is an offspring because an offspring is a persons child and a fetus according to the proof I have presented today a fetus can not be considered a child since it isn't a human being.) But the fetus is also part of one human beings body just like a dandruff and a fetus and dandruff present a chance of actually becoming a human being not a 100% security. Yes the definition Human Being states a child of the species homo sapiens but a fetus is not considered a child. Since a child is a human being and a fetus is not. "Offspring and child are reasonably synonymous. Therefore my second contention still stands"I have stated many reasons as to why a fetus can not be considered an offspring nor child. "Midgets are of a different size than the typical NBA player, but that does not mean that midgets should have less of a legal right to live."There is a similarity between NBA players and midgets and is because of this similarity that even though midgets are shorter they still have the same legal right to live as an NBA player does. The similarity is that they are both human beings unlike a fetus and a woman. They both show human being characteristics, there is no opinion and no doubt between the fact that an NBA player and a midget are human beings, yet it is an opinion that fetuses are human beings. The opponent makes the same connection for toddlers and teenagers but my same rebuttal will stand. "Now I did not mention societal differences within my opening arguments, quite frankly because I was not expecting such a bad argument. Does a newborn really have a personality, understanding or even love either? No, but that doesn’t make him or her less of a human being."Actually scientifically speaking yes a newborn not only has personality but shows it as well. A newborn is considered a newborn from the day it is born till the age of 12 months.[2] Therefor at the age of 2 months the newborn starts to show social grins to familiar faces. At the age of 4 months the newborn starts to imitate those around him. Stick you're tongue out at him/her and he/she might do the same. At the age of 7 months the newborn will raise his hands for you to hold him/her and carry him/her as well he/she will be only grabbing his/her favorite toys. At the age of 11 months the newborn will be able to say "mama" even though the newborn first word may differentiate according to his surroundings. This means that the age of 11 months this newborn will start to practice one of his/her rights, this right that we all enjoy the freedom of speech. At the age of 12 months the newborn will have the motor and communication skills to give the one's he/she loves and is familiar with a kiss. All of these actions shows that newborn know who they love and who they prefer.[3] This shows that they contain human characteristics. By all these actions the newborn is showing love to those he is familiarized with yet the opponent believes this is a bad argument? Also a baby can practice his freedom of religion at any age, when I was 5 months I was baptized in the "holy" waters even though I was only 5 months and was not aware of what was going on I was still practicing my freedom of religion. So yes a newborn does put some of his rights from the first amendment in action. The opponent rebuts my contention by attempting to make some sort of similarities between a hospital and a mother yet doctors and nurses get a paycheck to save life's it is their job to help any person's that life's may be in danger that comes to them. It isn't the job of a mother to do so. Therefore the opponent still fails to prove to me and audience as to why a woman should be obligated to save the life of a fetus. Though morally most people would agree with, it is still her choice and in no way should we force a woman to carry a fetus or to some woman a burden inside of her for 9 months. It is her body and if she wants to put a bullet through her head or simply have an abortion the final decision is hers and we shouldn't come between it. "Well actually citizens are not the only ones who the U.S. Gov’t prohibits from killing. The 14thamendment states that “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws we for example are not allowed to initiate homicide against illegal immigrants."This is true but illegal immigrants are human beings which reside within the United States. Also if the opponent is not aware of the fact that if a man/woman kill a fetus while in the mothers womb it is considered a legal felony and he/she will be charged with two different charges one for the attack/killing of a woman and the killing of the fetus. The government has placed this right because no one besides the woman knows what she would like to do with her body, so abortion should remain legal because a woman is making choice upon her own body while another person that comes & kills this fetus does not know the intentions of the woman with her fetus. Wether she wanted it to become her future child or if she was going to have an abortion. Thanks and I await the opponent's response. [1] http://www.now.org...[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...[3] http://www.parenting.com...