BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Navi shouldn't have awaken Link up.

Note: "Gerudo" will be the term for the 'human' version of Ganondorf. "Ganondorf" will imply has the Triforce. Now, 6 items are needed to get to the Triforce:The 3 Gems, The Song of Time, the Ocarina of Time and arguebly, the Master Sword. If you aren't familer with the game, I suggest you leave, but, I will say that Con has the BOP on refuting all point points on each item. Let's say Gerudo never gets his hands on the Kokiri Emerald. The Emerald is needed to open the Door of Time each leads to the Master Sword. No Emerald equals no Triforce, and there is no other way to reach the Triforce. Simlilar arguemnts stand for the other Gems. I will expand next round. To you Tuf.
Navi shouldn't have awaken Link up.

R1 is for acceptance, but Con can post his/her opening shots,RULES: 1) No semantics. 2)"Should have" means there would be better results. 3)OOT: Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time 4)This is a debate about the game ONLY. Anything esle is not considered.5) http://www.youtube.com...This is a video that shows the background to the debate.6) This is SERIOUS. No "Then OOT would be a shitty game!" arguments. I will pick TUF.
Islam is not a religion of peace

O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: 764 They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. THAT IS THE POINT!!! Yeah you "can" have non-muslim friends but chances are very rare!! I did not say Islam is not a religion and I don't know where did you see that? And those are FACTS!!! Yeah not all muslims are bad but when you have 300 million people that support some kind of terrorism that is a big problem!!! And final fact!! How are you punished if you try to change religion(If you are muslim) YOU GET KILLED!!!STONED TO DEATH LIKE IN MEDIEVAL ERA!!! I had many sources that confirm that facts. I am against homosexuality but I am not saying that you should kill him for having other sex preference. Killing people is not right and religion that kills people for opinion,sexuality or religion IS NOT religion of peace. Women should have same rights as man and not be forced to wear something that is not practical.Women in Islam are like slaves.And dont get me started about harems!!! Point is that i dont have anything against Islam but i have against people that say "Islam is religion of peace"
Islam is not a religion of peace

You first made a statement that Islam is not a religion, this is so false. Definition of religion: http://www.dictionary.com... I can ignore 80% of your argument when you started talking about Hamas. I don't even need to explain why. You gave one source, let me talk about that in detail. [5:51]O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: 764 They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust. [5:52] Those in whose hearts 765 is a disease " thou seest how eagerly they run about amongst them, saying: "We do fear lest a change of fortune bring us disaster." Ah! Perhaps Allah will give (thee) victory, or a decision according to His will. Then will they repent of the thoughts which they secretly harboured in their hearts. [5:53] And those who believe will say: "Are these the men who swore their strongest oath by Allah, that they were with you? 766 All that they do will be in vain, and they will fall into (nothing but) ruin." [5:54] O ye who believe! If any from among you turn back from this Faith, soon will Allah produce a people whom He will love as they will love Him, - lowly with the Believers, mighty against the Rejecters, fighting in the Way of Allah, and never afraid of the reproaches of such as find fault. 767 That is the Grace of Allah, which He will bestow on whom He pleaseth. And Allah encompasses all, and He knoweth all things. [5:55] Your (real) friends are (no less than) Allah, His Messenger, and the Believers " those who establish regular prayers and pay charity, and they bow down humbly (in worship). [5:56] As to those who turn (for friendship) to Allah, His Messenger, and the Believers " it is the party of Allah that must certainly triumph. [5:57] O ye who believe! Take not for friends and protectors those who take your religion for a mockery or sport 768 " whether among those who received the Scripture before you, or among those who reject Faith: but fear ye Allah, if ye have Faith (indeed). [5:58] When ye proclaim your call to prayer, they take it (but) as mockery and sport; that is because they are people without understanding. This is what Ibn Abbas one of the companions of the prophet had to say about this verse (O ye who believe!) in Muhammad and the Qur'an. (Take not the Jews and Christians for friends) seeking their assistance and help. (They are friends one to another) He says: some are followers of the religion of others in secret and in the open, just as they are friends of each other. (He among you) O group of believers (who taketh them for friends) seeking their assistance and help (is (one) of them) in alliance and is not included in Allah's protection and safety. (Lo! Allah guideth not) to His religion and proof (wrong-doing folk) the Jews and Christians. It is clear that we can have non-Muslim friends.
Islam is not a religion of peace

Islam is NOT a religion of peace!!! Should religion of peace support killing people that are not muslim?! Islamic violence is a religious problem. The fulfillment of Islam depends on the subjugation of non-Muslims so that violence against non-Muslims become the essence of religion. When Hamas states that, "Killing Jews is worship that draws us close to Allah" or the ISIS rapists tell Yazidi girls that rape "draws them closer to Allah", they really do mean it. To its followers the validity of Islam is directly connected to its physical supremacy. As followers of the purported "final revelation" to mankind, Muslims not only have the obligation to conquer and subjugate the rest of the world, their religion is meaningful to the extent that they can carry on the work begun by Mohammed. The Jihadis who massacre non-Muslims are missionaries of their faith. That is why Muslim terrorists shout, "Allahu Akbar", "Allah is greater." The old Mohammedan taunt aimed at Jews was then directed at Christians, Hindus, Buddhists and all the world's religions. By killing their non-Muslim victims, the Muslims proved that Allah was greater than their gods. Forcing non-Muslims into a submissive position affirms the truth and power of Islam. By causing infidels to "lose face", the Muslim fulfills the Koranic verse which promises that Allah had sent Mohammed to make Islam supreme over all religions. By contrast when Islam "loses face", an act of blasphemy has been committed, which can only be righted religiously by killing the non-Muslims, thereby forcing them to lose face and once again affirming the physical superiority of Islam. This creates the cycle of violence, which is not the result of Christian or Jewish oppression, but of the need for Muslims to validate the truth of their faith by oppressing non-Muslims. To co-exist with non-Muslims is blasphemous for a Muslim, when his Koran proclaims "Do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends" (Koran 5:51). Mohammed's final command was to ethnically cleanse the Jews and Christians of the Arabian Peninsula. ISIS sees itself as completing the work that he began.
Disabled People Should Pay More Taxes

You did not refute any one of my arguments. They all still stand. "b/c you have autism, You owe me $100K right now. " No I don't. Even if DIsabled people should pay an extra $100 k in taxes (they shouldn't) the money shouldn't go to you. You are not where our tax dollars go to. "Please pay up, Or im going to smash your head with an axe" Apart from the fact that there was a grammatical error in part because you forgot the period, Threatening someone with death for something as trivial as them not paying your proposed tax is extremely poor conduct and is a death threat. I hope you don't get into trouble since I believe in free speech, But it should be clear that many voters would disagree with me and would want you kicked off of the internet or even ending up in 20 years in jail. This happened according to the link I put below: (. https://www. Huffingtonpost.
Disabled People Should Pay More Taxes

I did copy sand paste it in part because ice bear never refuted it. The disabled people who commit crimes should be punished but you should never punish a group for the actions of the individual. This violates the concept of individual justice. Begging is not a crime. It also is an indicator that they are poor and therefore could not afford an annual 6 figure tax. "anyways, Since only ppl with income are required to pay taxes, Disabled ppl will just quit their job and say they got fired or don't like their job. " This would increase the unemployment rate among disabled people. "However, Disabled ppl should be sent to prison, And thus in prison, They will be trained and forced to work on building the time machine. " Why? This is off topic.
Disabled People Should Pay More Taxes

looks like you just copy/pasted from a previous debate you had with sb else. Anyways, Many disabled ppl commit crimes, Such as begging. Begging is bad, Sinful, And illegal, And considering how much money they make, Disabled ppl who are employed should pay $100k to atone for the crimes their fellow disabled brethren commit i am not disabled, So it is perfectly justified for me to write this. I do not have a learning disability or eating disorder, I am not missing any body parts, Im not depressed or diabetic, Im 5ft6 and weigh 125 lbs, And i do not use wheelchairs, And nor am i bald, As you can probably tell from my avatar, And im not ginger or albino anyways, Since only ppl with income are required to pay taxes, Disabled ppl will just quit their job and say they got fired or don't like their job. However, Disabled ppl should be sent to prison, And thus in prison, They will be trained and forced to work on building the time machine. currently, Me, As well as ice, What50, And masterful have created a white supremacist group to imprison the disabled homeless. Everyone else thats disabled and working will have to pay $100k per yr
Disabled People Should Pay More Taxes

While some disabled people use wheelchairs and chruches I would like to point out some basic facts: 1: Not all disabled people use wheelchairs or crutches; I know I don't. Https://www. Census. Gov. . . That nearly 1/5 people have disabilities. They include a wide variety of disabilities; as an example someone with glasses would have a disability since they can't see as well. 2: Even the small percentage of disabled people who actually have a history of using crutches don't cost society $100k a year. While disabled people who need wheelchairs or chrutches should be pay for them without the government's help, Taxing them $100k a year for their disabled status is extremely discriminitory against the disabled people. You won't even have to build a time machine. I have a time machine at my house. It's called a clock. However, Nuking India also would not be an ethical thing to do. Indians have rights. Pro's only reason why he hates Indians so much is because they smell. I don't know if Indians tend to be more smelly then non indians, But their smelliness does not justify nuking the subcontenent for 3 reasons: 1: Nuking innocent people to avoid an extremely nominal smell is extremely immoral and infringes on human rights 2: India is far away from the west. Even if Indians smelled very bad, Their stentch wouldn't be noticed from America and Europe by the human nose. 3: It turns out that the nucluear fallout may smell much worse then some Indians since nucluear material smells bad.
Disabled People Should Pay More Taxes

disabled ppl should pay more taxes b/c they really waste materials and resources such as wheelchairs, Crutches, Leg braces, Hearing aids, Glasses, And retarded ppl stuff like diapers or pacifiers. As a 20 year old, Ive experienced lots of ppl, And many of them are disabled. And disabilites include red hair, Being deaf, Being short, Obesity, Eating disorders, Dyslexia, Autism, Adhd, Downs syndrome, Depression, Cerebral palsy, Crooked teeth, Missing body parts, Deformed body parts, And baldness all disabled ppl should, From now on, Pay $100, 000 usd, Or the equivalent currency of the country in which they live, Each year. With that money, We will build a time machine, Go back in time, And nuke india so they won't stink up the world we will take away ppl's glasses and build windows for the time macine, Confiscate prosthetic limbs to use as mechanical parts of the time machine, And imprison blacks to work on the time machine, If you really insist they are smart like mlk or degrasse, Since theres a limit of one black family in a neighborhood https://www. Reddit. Com/r/offmychest/comments/1r73nk/my_indian_roommate_is_fucking_disgusting/ no, Im not icebeartheawesome, But we do know each other in real life. We both teach at the same school. He teaches history, And i teach english 100k usd per yr for each disabled person, No exceptions im pro, Youre con lets go
Goal Line Technology Should not be used in football( international) no matter how important the game

Let's have a nice one. I will refer to football international as soccer as they say in America 1. A sport such as soccer or rugby is given the excitement due to the fact that it is all human. There isn't a single trace of technology in this beautiful game. As a sport, the game depends all on human judgement and error. It is what makes such a game so entertaining. Almost everything nowadays are related to technology and sports is the one thing that tries its best to keep away from the modern world and is still watched everywhere. Think about it. .. do we really need computer technology to ruin such a game as soccer just because the referees make extremely rare mistakes? There are only 2 occurrences in football that I have watched where the ball passed the goal line but the referee didn't count it (1966 and 2010). They are highly trained and still can make errors but it is what makes everyone love the game. 2. Why is soccer the most popular sport? It is because it is the most simple game to play. Get any kind of ball that is suitable to kick and get a friend. Pass it back and forth and there you have it. Very primitive but who's to say it isn't soccer? Soccer is simplicity. Simplicity is soccer. Adding any kind of technology just to make a decision of whether or not the ball passed a line more clear is removing the simplicity and moving it towards the modern life. 3. Adding goal line technology will separate soccer from the category of sports due to the fact that more and more technology will be added in. Like people say, it's only hard to lie the first time, but after that, it's as easy as eating pie. Same with technology; add it and soccer will become more of a business. 4. The referee is trained and hired to be unbiased. If he is biased, then it is FIFA's fault. However, in most cases, FIFA does a good job in plucking out the best of the best. If you have been involved in any kind of soccer game, you should know that it is your duty as a player to listen to the referee no matter how unfair you think it is because the opposing side might think the referee is right. Lots of players these days show discontent and frustration towards the referees but that is not right. They must make immediate judgement and he should be trusted and respected. There are thousands of people in the stands, do you think he can be biased in front of all those people? Their errors are pure and totally acceptable because they are human
Goal Line Technology Should not be used in football( international) no matter how important the game

Hello ilovedebate. Thank you for providing the opportunity to debate the wonderful sport of football! Soccer has always been one of my favorite topics to discuss and I find this particular subject especially interesting. I'm not sure why it is only international football we are debating about, but I honestly don't think it makes much of a difference. My opponent has only briefly opened an argument so I will do the same and assume the real arguing will begin in round two. Putting goal line technology into the awesome sport of football would be an improvement. I hate it when things are allowed that shouldn't have been allowed; or things that should have been allowed are not allowed. Every sport has a number of such problems. Off sides, diving, fouls, corners, free kicks and goals are some examples for football. To counter any one of these problems would only be an improvement, and I think goals are probably the most important of any of these. I also do not see how goal line technology would make it unexciting as my opponent says. I will now let my opponent make his argument for round two and hears for a good debate!
Goal Line Technology Should not be used in football( international) no matter how important the game

I have posted this debate because lots of football international (soccer) fans were fighting about it. Thank you to whoever accepts and goodluck Terms: Goal Line Technology: a proposed technology which determines when the ball has crossed the goal-line, thus indicating whether a goal has been scored or not. Background Soccer is a beautiful game in which 11 players on each team get to play without using their hands. The objective of the game is to make the ball pass the goalie and into the net. There are three referees. Recently, in the World Cup 2010 game in Africa, the referees called a clearly made goal made by England not valid because the goalie in the opposing team (Germany) quickly grabbed the ball after it had bounced into the goal. Therefore, many players and fans are demanding that FIFA (International Federation of Association Football) should impose a new technology called goal-line technology to see if the ball passed the net. Argument I will just open up briefly The game of soccer is all about basic and simple rules. Get the ball past the net without breaking any of the rules with the certain extent of the referees. Soccer is an extremely primitive game but putting technology into such a game makes it all the more uneventful and unexciting.
Superman is better than batman

Batman does not have any "super" weaknessness because he just isn't super. That is the only reason. He isn't good enough to have a weakness but Superman is. And exactly, Batman is just a normal guy. That makes him weak and unqualified to be better than Superman. Superman has flight, superhuman strength, x-ray vision, heat vision, freeze breath, super-speed, enhanced hearing, and nigh-invulnerability. How can you compete with that? Oh and please do your research before saying that he doesn't have that many enemies because if you look at https://en.wikipedia.org... will find a list about 5 pages long.
Superman is better than batman

Superman's weakness(one) is Kryptonite. BATMAN HAS A RING MADE OF KRYPTONITE!!! Batman is a normal man, so I hope you understand when I say he has no weaknesses. But Batman has so much Kryptonite that he could just hold it in his hand and Superman would be frightened. I bet Batman can shape gauntlets out of Kryptonite and thwack "Super"-"Man". Oh, and Robin isn't purposely trying to kiss Poison Ivy. SHE uses her poison to KILL. It is a weapon. But that is off topic.
Superman is better than batman

It is Gotham, not Gatham. superman only uses those powers to fly around the world and save Lois. And Batman has multiple enemies, not one, and has beaten them all. Superman has more than one weakness. I think Superman was supposed to be invincible, and then someone complained that that can't happen. Batman has saved all of Gotham many times, not just saving a girl too good for him only once. I mean, really?!
moon landing is a hoax

1] landing crateri am talking about crater caused by rocket engine when they land on ground. my opponent says about crater caused by asteroid impact. these 2 are very much different. besides when luner module landed it was burning fuel already.Apollo 11 landed with less fuel than other missions, and the astronauts also encountered a premature low fuel warning. Armstrong took semi-automatic control[15] and, with Aldrin calling out altitude and velocity data, landed at 20:17 UTC on July 20 with about 25 seconds of fuel left.if it is burning fuel then there must be an exhost for fuel jets. if there is jet, there must be some scratch or some burning over the ground. but my point is that ground was totally intact. there is no scratch, no burning, no interference with ground. how this is possible?also i have provided source. the video is the source. my opponent just overlooked it.source:http://en.wikipedia.org...2] lack of starsif it is of a superoir quality camera, how come there is such an ordinery limitation of bandwidth, size and weight? this is very strange.3] different lighthere my opponent agree that artificial lighting is used in movie studios. Artificial lighting is also used in stadiums. That must mean the astronauts were in a stadium. i thank him/ her for agreement.4] govt. agencyi have already stated why govt. agency can lie.5] medical knowledgeagain no specific information about the findings of gemini project. only stating goal and exploring possibility does not clear the point. 6] space racemy opponent has no common sense so that he could understand. so nothing to encounter.7] distance and speedfrom the source given by my opponent, it is the 3rd stage rocket that get activated to push the spaceship into moon's orbital has the speed of 24500mph. the 3rd stage rocket gets activated when the spacecraft is very near the moon: almost close to its orbital. but how come the space craft travel the distance between earth and orbital of moon with less than 4 days?by the way how come luner module come back to earth from moon with less than 4 day with just only one rocket engine when it went to the moon with 3 rocket engine?source: http://www.nasm.si.edu...one more argumentthe entire moon landing was shown on tv. that makes the entire case just a film with no solid ground.well therefore moon landing has no solid ground.