I'm Pro Gun: Change my Mind

My opponent brought up an interesting thing which was background checks so in this argument I will be opposing to background checks. 3rd argument: People can forge data of themselves for the simplest reason as a job interview for background tests. So if that is possible,why bother with background checks anyways? Heres a link people play the system:https://www.tlnt.com... Also,my opponent mentioned that shooters usually get firearms from illegal black markets. So what is the point of a background check if you can obtain firearms illegally? In total I have two questions which needs clarification: 1)What is the point of background checks on people who want to obtain firearms when they can get it illegally? 2)For those who purchase firearms legally, how sure are you they will not forge data? If they do,how can you be sure it is true? Rebuttals: "Singapore's murder rate has always been low. You shouldn't compare other countries murder rates, as every country is different. You should instead compare the rates before and after gun bans. I have already cited those statistics." But you said and I quote,"Cities that have strict gun control laws have some of the highest murder rates in the country." Singapore has strict gun control or like no guns at all. And singapore is a city as well. "America has more than 330 million guns. If we ban them, several will go into the black market, were they can be used illegally." At least it wont be all of the guns. And eventually the black market will close. "People will also use knives, vehicles, and other weapons if they can't get a gun. People will not be able to protect themselves from those threats, either." Look countries like singapore legalise knives which are sharp(not swiss army knives and stuff like that but they"re still sharp) and vehicles are legalised. Im typing this on a bus on the way to tuition just to confirm its legalised. And I dont hear of many accidents. Yes there have been quite a few cases but its not everytime. Whereas guns are the number one causes for murder crimes. You dont need much evidence for that do ya? I mean just turn on the news and if a new murder is being reported its always guns except for a few situations. Proof guns are usually the cause:http://www.politifact.com... Rebuttal 2 on background checks:One can easily forge data on themselves,memorise it and present it to whoever is conducting the test. So how are background checks possible when you can forge things like passports? "Show me when guns were banned and the effect it had on singapore." Elaborate what exactly you are wanting me to search for or search for it yourself because I have no idea what you are asking since we"ve leaglised guns for probrably the longest time ever. "This is also not an effective model for the U.S." Prooved enough that with a gun ban the murder rate decreases. Doesnt have to be the U.S. but shows what will happen with a gun ban. If this gun ban goes global,trust me murder rates would decrease. "...because we have the most guns in the world." Then ban them. Problem solved. "Or the black market and they could also use literally other object." Wont be effective enough. Like how do you rob a bank with knives? I understand the black market can still use other tools but why do you think so many criminals use guns to murder instead of knives? "gun bans do not statisticly reduce murders." I just showed you a link that a place with a gun ban had drastic drops in terms of murders. And it had a graph to show it. Show a link to me that gun bans dont statisticaly reduce murders. "Only criminals harm people with guns." Which is why we should ban guns. When you brought up the parkway shootings, you prooved to me that the feds should take precautions. Shouldnt we take a precaution for this situation? "Like I said, conceal carry holders committ cimes" And they get their guns through black markets yea. And the only way the black market gets firearms is to get firearms themselves. And they get it from gun stores. So to prevent the black markets from getting firearms is to ban guns. "Why would you give the government your self-defense rights and firearms when they are the exact ones guns were designed to protect against?" Like I said in my second argument:The second ammendment is NOT. I repeat:is NOT an unlimited right to own guns. My argument states why but because I think there wont be enough space,just re read it. "There is no way to completely get rid of gun violence. "I"ll give you one:ban guns. "People will still find a way to get a gun illegally." They have to get firearms from somewhere. My guess is mostly firearm stores. With guns banned and firearms no longer being sold, they"re resources are limited and will run out eventually. "I am in favor of stricter background checks..." You do know that people can change for the better or the worse right? How do you intend to prepare for bad case scenarios? And I thought you said people can get firearms illegally? So what is the point of having background checks anyways? "...and arming teachers with guns so they can protect the students." Of which the teacher could be the gunman somehow. Great plan! "If guns are banned, they can get guns off the black market, or use knives, vehicles, or their bare fists to kill you, without you having any protection because guns are banned." Singapore allows knives and vehicles and yet there are hardly any homicides in here. "...gun bans do not statisticly reduce murders in big countries, cities in america, and america that has done it to an extent from 1994-2004 which also did nothing to prevent murders." Show me a link that a state in america strictly did not allow guns and the murder rate went higher.