Failed Nations are a bigger threat to the United States than Stable Nations

Again I apologize for such a coincidence. Thank you. "Using evidence signifies flaws in logic."-James Morgan (Parli Cpt with 1435 NFL points in 2009) http://www.fundforpeace.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... For further clarifications: I will use examples in the past as "evidence." Stable and failed nations will be redefined as: Failed nations- anything below Warning including Warning in the evidence above. Stable-any country that is anything above Warning. My case rebuttal: 1. First China is a socialist country, it's not communism because it has a growing middle class and is booming industrially (communism focuses on agriculture and doesn't have a middle class). Feel free to look it up on Wikipedia. Second failed nations are a threat because they stubbornly will not accept democracy. A large majority of the stable nations are democratic. Another example: N.Keorea is ,considered as a failed nation because they are very unstable and can't feed their people, a threat to democracy because: 1. They have nukes; 2. they support communism and dictatorship; 3. They are a threat to S.Keorea (a US interest and military base). Thus they are a threat to democracy. 2. "But the United States was able to recover from this attack" Bush spent millions of dollars to fight the war and later we are thrown into a economy crisis. We still have not recovered from this. Terrorist attacks are not just in the U.S but abroad; for example the past India hotel shooting where terrorists were questioning for American/British passports then executing whoever had them, that's a threat. Stronger security leads to more airport guards, more sophisticated equipment, funding money for the CIA to find suspects, etc. All of this leads to a financial drain. The causes? Failed nations that house such groups sends terrorists to create fear that then causes a tighter security that might even restrict US citizen's rights. Stable nations do not have to send killers to intimidate us, nor do they have to kill lives; thus failed nations do more damage. Sir, are you suggesting human lives are less important than money? We can always slowly recover from a financial crisis (it took FDR 10 years!); but reviving a dead, that's impossible. Human lives are worth more than material goods. 3. The point here was on illegal immigration. Failed nations "export" many illegal immigrants. Illegal immigration leads to higher crime rates, increased dependency on black markets or government, etc. a. Why would rich immigrants move to the U.S, they are happy with their environment? The government still has to provide for low income families. This is a financial threat. Now you also brought up another point about jobs. Currently jobs are tough to find the U.S, with a new wave of immigrants, they take away the easygoing jobs from U.S citizens due to some reasons such as working for lower pay. b. Prove crimes are caused by U.S citizens. Immigrants are the cause of hatred among some resenting Americans (not me though:). For example during past strikes, citizens stopped working because of unfair conditions, they could have won if it wasn't for immigrants that worked for unfair wages. Now this: 1. Is unfair to immigrants and 2. Slows the process to reform labor. With a high number of immigration that live in poverty, such as an increasing number of illegal southern border crossings, cities will become littered with garbage, disease, pickpockets, etc. Soon tourism numbers will decrease. His case rebuttals: 1a. Environmental emissions are also being controlled in such countries. Cancer was never mentioned in R1 nor were any evidence provide for it, those arguments must be dropped. AIDS kill millions each year they are caused by failed nations that cannot obtained sanitary equipments. b. According to the evidence in the beginning Russia is considered as a failed nation. All con arguments must be dropped. 2a. The U.S can always find other means to raise money to pay back the debts, through taxes, regulations to keep currency in the U.S, less reckless military spending, etc. A predator drone costs 5 million each and we have over 200! If the government can stop such reckless spending they may see a rise in revenue. b. Even though China may own this much we can always find ways to pay it back in ways described above. (This one novice girl in Congress once suggested using carnivals to pay off the debts:) Thank you.