My Case Against Miscegenation.

Quote; "Also, in countries like India or Israel, there is no call for miscegenation because their population is comprised of mostly people of their own culture"" Do you think that might be to do with the fact that to go live in Israel one must genetically prove they are Jewish? The religious side is moot. Israel do not care if they are religious or atheist. What they do care about is that they are genetically Jewish. Do you think it might have to do with those pesky marriage laws which disallow a Jew from marrying and pro creating with non- Jews in Israel? Quote; "Europeans though, reside in countries where they themselves are outnumbered. Unless they want to breed with only members of their own race until they all die.." Outnumbered by what or whom? Non Europeans? Not quite yet but getting there. Do you think this could be to do with the insanity of an open borders policy to non- European lands in the past few decades(but esp the last 20yrs)? So we"ve established that Europeans are getting outnumbered, and in their own lands. Against their will also, since at no time has anyone asked for this non- European influx and that includes the outright insanity of the one playing out before us right now. For thousands of years the European people survived and thrived, prospered by marrying within their own race/nationality/ethnic group. But for some unexplained reason if we go on doing what worked for thousands of years it will mean Europeans would "all die". This clearly makes no sense at all. How would Swedes having kids with Swedes cause Swedes to die? How does Germans having kids with Germans cause Germans to die? Instead of "causing them to die", it does precisely the opposite, it promotes life, their future as a people, and it conserves all that is unique and different to that given people. This would be like suggesting to Israel that unless Jewish women start marrying and having kids with Africans, that "Jews will die". It"s the opposite to what you say, they would only be diluted and "die" if Jewish women began to commonly mix and marry with blacks and Arabs. Jews don"t spent time and money to reach out to their "diaspora" and implore them not to marry a gentile for nothing. They do it for a very basic and fundamental motive " the preservation of the Jewish people. Miscegenation is not naturally as big a threat to Africans as it is to Jews or whites. There are in the region of 1.2 billion Africans. This goes on growing and growing, since Africans have no shortage of children, and with the money, aid and medicine gifted by the altruistic white countries(among so many other things), their numbers have exploded artificially. Here we can measure the scale of that explosion; 1800 -107,000,000 1850 - 111,000,000 1900 - 133,000,000 And in 2015? "As of 2015, the population estimates are around 1.166 billion." http://worldpopulationreview.com... These vast numbers alone ensure that the African race can easily absorb a level of miscegenation. Indeed, any impact would merely be a positive one for the African on average, since he or she is effectively improving their gene pool. Their offspring is likely, on average, to have a higher IQ than they would had they been a full African. And IQ is directly related to decision making and behaviours. However, even miscegenation for Africans is not without a downside. Many mixed race teens will often speak of a confused identity. They may not share the same level of impulsive behaviours as a full African, and yet they are considered by everyone to be black, even if their mix is 50/50. We used to use the term mixed race, which is far more accurate. But somehow or other, politically correct parlance morphed things so that this term was disapproved of. All mixed race kids then became de facto blacks. Obama is considered black, even though it is clear he has a great deal of European DNA. Mixed race kids often find themselves rejected or even bullied by blacks. In an effort to appease their peers they not uncommonly over reach, over compensate, and can be the most vocal and hateful when speaking about white people. They may have a whole side to their family who are white, and yet are not uncommonly the loudest voices when it comes to hateful statements aimed at whites. In examples such as this I can only assume it is down to trying to over compensate and convince full blacks how "black" they are. I accept there are likely instances of mixed race kids never having these inner conflicts and feelings of loss of true identity, but it is not rare that they do and it is entirely down to miscegenation. Yet another good reason for a white person not to engage in miscegenation are the sheer levels of HIV and STI's among Africans. Here are figures to give context; Black/African Americans accounted for 46% of all new HIV infections in 2013, and make up 43% of the total number of people living with HIV in the USA, despite only making up 13% of the population - Between 2009-2013, black/African Americans accounted for: 63% of all HIV infections among women 67% of all HIV infections among children below 13 years old 42% of all HIV infections among males - http://www.avert.org... Beyond all doubt and question, if a white man or women miscegenates with an African (American) then they are quite literally putting their life at greater risk. When you set that against the fact that a white women is over 12 times more likely to be murdered by a black partner than from one within her own race and it is irrefutable that for a white women(or man) to date outside of their own race(and esp with Africans) is literally a greater risk to(her) life. A German Shepherd and a Wolf share much of the same DNA and genetic make up. They even look similar. If you gave 50 people a wolf cub and 50 people a German Shepherd puppy, what do you suppose would unfold as they raised them as pets? They are so genetically similar. They roughly look the same. You've given both out as pups or cubs. What would be the outcome? It is obvious that those given the wolf cubs would find them far more problematic to raise as pets, and that far more of those given the cubs would be injured as it grew and developed. Yet you raised both at an early age in identical conditions. It is the same between the races of man. The African and the European are both 'homo sapien'. They may even share 98% of the same genetic make up. But it's those apparently small differences that matter. What you may seen as a tiny genetic or biological difference will translate to something very obviously different in the physical realm, the cultural and behavioural. ** AIDS: According to the CDC, black men who identify as heterosexual are 15 times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV/AIDS. Black men are also more likely to have HIV/AIDS and not be diagnosed. However, let"s assume the rate at which black and white men with HIV/AIDS goes undiagnosed. If you had a million young white women and 7% engaged in relations with black men, then more women in that 7% will have been exposed to HIV/AIDS than the other 93%. This does not end with AIDS. According to the CDC, black are 8.7 times more likely to be diagnosed with chlamydia. 20.5 times more likely to be diagnosed with gonorrhea, and 9.1 times more likely to be diagnosed with syphilis. http://www.cdc.gov... Black females are over 20 times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV/AIDS than white females. White females who date black males increased their chances, astronomically, of dying from AIDS. Premature death among black females from homicide and AIDS is: 3.9 times higher than white females among those who are 15-19 4.4 times higher than white females among those who are 20-24 7.3 times higher than white females among those who are 25-34