Amanda Knox is more likely innocent than guilty

Gah 1 hour to make this, gotta make this count.==Final Rbuttal==1st incriminating evidence: The Double DNA knifeI stated that it was all just a possibility, the knife could have been used to kill the victim, we all wont know if this really was the murder weapon or not. There was no other suitable murder weapon found, so it was assumed that this knife was the murder weapon. But even then, i wont be needing the knife to prove Amanda Knox's involvement in the murder. Like i said, its a possibility supported by other evidence.2nd incriminating evidence: The victim's bra-clasp and the braNow as we know, there was a footprint at the crime scene. It reacted to Luminol, plain and simple. You mention it was tested with TMB, but like i just said, if the blood wasnt sufficient enough, it will show a NEGATIVE result. Also, how do you explain why it the Luminol even reacted to it? But to the point, the bra-clasp had Raffaele's DNA. It was a good amount as well. The only way that Raffaele's DNA could have winded up on her bra was touching it. Unless Meredith casually allows most boys to touch her bra, it certainly is odd. As for Amanda's DNA, i guess thats self explanatory.For that issue with the Bleach, not everywhere was bleached, only certain parts of the house.Also, i'm not lying, there were no DNA found casually around the house meaning there was bleach usage. But the Luminol reacted to the footprint, meaning that the bleach was used at an earlier timeframe, plain and simple. This means whatever evidences was found are most likely found after the bleaching. The inspectors came with a group of around 4 people, you claim they all reported the same and thus are all lying?3rd incriminating evidence: The bathroom and bloody footprintsBelieve it or not, DNA reacts to Luminol. It would be a miracle if the blood had a POSITIVE result if they were kept under the constant flow of water. TMB didn't seem to react to it, but Luminol does it seems. The reaction was faint though. Even if Luminol isnt only specific to blood, it doesnt explain why Amanda's DNA are all over it and no reaction from TMB doesnt prove that those substances weren't blood either.Everything rests upon the story of bleaching, but alot of factors has shown that Bleach usage in the house was very likely.1. Perjury and slanderThe story those 2 told are actually Perjury to the tops. Claiming shes sleeping with her boyfriend at his place and then changing the story all the way to being actually in the crime scene is incredible. Both were lying to create an alibi for themselves and you still think its acceptable?! Also, the police have the right to detain suspects if they need to, Amanda just simply abused it and accused Lumumba. Also, that excuse is the same that Amanda used, and it got beaten down.2. Rudy GuedeRudy is guilty, we know that. But everything is also stacked against Amanda and Raffaele, dont forget that. The testimony just adds another bit of dramatic evidences on those 2.3. Phone TrafficProof it that the reason they turned the phones off were because they had sex. Oh wait, you can't. My point stands.4. Discovery and suspicious activity Odd behaviour adds to their suspiciousness. Amanda's best friend just died and they celebrate? Now THATS what i call strange.== Closing ==Rudy Guede may be guilty, but that doesn't mean that Amanda is instantly innocent as well. The evidences aren't pointing that Amanda COULD have killed her, it mostly proves that she DID kill her. Amanda's DNA everywhere where blood is spilled, Raffaele's DNA ending up on the most incriminating places of all and not somewhere else, both lying for their alibi and both having inconsistent stories after broken. If they both didn't do it, hell how could all these evidences even appear like this then?PS: I really dont have the time for this.....Sources:http://www.beforeyoutakethatpill.com......