The Idea that Small changes in Species leads to Large Radical Changes is NOT proved

I accept Pro's debate. I look forward to an interesting debate. I will first present my case, and then do rebuttals in the following paragraph. On the upcoming rounds, I will do only rebuttals and present my argument. Hopefully, that format will be accepted by Pro. My case: I. E. coli long-term evolution experiment This experiment was an ongoing long term experiment involving the E. coli. 12 initially identical populations of asexual Escherichia coli bacteria since 24 February 1988.The populations reached the milestone of 50,000 generations in February 2010 and 60,000 in in April 2014. During this experiment, Richard Lenski that had been tracking genetic changes in 12 initially identical populations of asexual Escherichia coli bacteria since 24 February 1988. The populations reached the milestone of 50,000 generations in February 2010 and 60,000 in April 2014. Some shocking evolution adaptions was the E. coli strand was able to use citric acid as a carbon source. This showed species can adapt to environment if pressure is put. II. The peppered moth The Biston betularia, is a classic example of evolution. By 1848 the frequency of dark-coloured moths was 2%, and by 1895 it was 95%. Before the widespread pollution during the Industrial Revolution in England, the Biston Betularia could easily camouflage due to its light coloration. The moth could easily rest upon light colored trees and lichens and not get eaten by predators. However, after the Industrial Revolution in England, many of the lichens died out, and the trees that peppered moths rested on became blackened by soot. That was a disadvantage to the moth, and now was an easy prey. Meanwhile the dark colored moth flourished due to its ability to camouflage to dark trees. This shed light upon modern evolutionary synthesis. III. Useless body parts The Plantaris Muscle is used to hold grip items with your feet. You may see some other apes use their feet as well as their hands. That is because they have the Plantaris Muscle. Humans, do not use their feet to grip objects. In humans that muscle is now useless and is often removed for tissue reconstruction. In fact, that body part is so useless, that 9% of the population is born without it! It shows how humans have developed and there has been a time where we needed that, but now its useless. It shows we have changed. Another example is the Appendix. The Appendix is often removed once it becomes infected, and is now useless. Although it is still speculated upon, many scientists have agreed humans once ate a rich cellulose diet (leaves) and the Appendix helped to digest the diet. The fact is, we hardly eat leaves anymore. Furthermore, it shows we have changed and evolved. Other parts include Coccyx, plica semilunaris, Third Eyelid, Wisdom teeth, Auriculares muscles, "Junk DNA, Vomeronasal organ, Goose Bumps. IV. Conclusion The vast majority of the scientific community and academia supports evolutionary theory as the only explanation that can fully account for observations in the fields of biology, paleontology, molecular biology, genetics, anthropology, and others. Nearly every scientific society accepts evolution and rejects creationism. With the previous paragraphs that I have stated, evolution is most accepted. Irrelevant side note: I wanted to present my irrelevant side note and this has nothing to do with my argument. I would like to clarify that evolution is simply a change in species, over certain pressure caused by environment. Species tend to change according to environment given a certain time. Evolution has nothing to do with origin of species, but is simply a biological change. Evolution is one of the biggest studies of biology. Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://listverse.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... (If pro has any objection to wikipedia, I will happily provide another source)