There are no contradictions in the bible

I hope my opponent can respond my time. I'll post as close to my time limit as possible. 1. Scientific Now we've begun to make some progress. Yom can symbolize anything from 12 hours to an indefinite period of time. If it took the "indefinite" period of time, I would argue there is a new contradiction presented- that is, if it takes a relatively indefinite period of time for Yahweh to complete each step of creation, it would seem he isn't omnipotent. Why would it take that long for God to create anything? The second part regarding Gap creationists is unclear to me, this is just a question to my opponent. Did the earth already exist and THEN God created everything, or did God create everything, and then earth decayed, and THEN humans were placed on earth? I just want to better understand the chronology before I can respond. "I said the bible has no contradictions wherefore I dont have to defend all Christian religions. So I dont have to defend religions/beliefs which assert something that is not in the bible. .. " Ehh. .. I haven't provided anything that isn't a biblical contradiction. And biblical contradictions apply to ALL Christian religions, so you do have to defend all of them. That is simply a burden that you didn't recognize when you instigated this debate. 2. Historical "2. If Usshers chronology is inaccurate then your argument is invalid. " Unfortunately, there are believers who follow Usshers chronology. It is my opponents burden to prove it as inaccurate (which shouldn't be too difficult anyways). But in my opinion, the contradiction will remain after he does that, because if he resolves the problem with Usshers CHRONOLOGY, he will have fixed the discrepancy in time. But, that leaves the biblical location in contradiction with the historical location. 3. Internal I continue to find it difficult that there is BOLDFACED PLAGIARISM in the Divinely inspired book of God. How is that something you can even allow through your brain? ! To all the readers; we, the debaters, seem to have reached an impasse as to what is acceptable. My opponent believes that plagiarism within the holy book of God is not problematic; I find it problematic to accept it. I urge a con vote, for it is absurd to believe that God would allow two DIFFERENT "inspired authors" of his book to have identical passages, implying one having plagiarized the other. 4. Logical God commanded that Adam and Eve live in the garden and eat anything BUT from *points at a tree* "THAT TREE. " Satan tempted Adam to, and they were punished. Is that sufficient to explain why it doesn't make sense that God and Satan would work together? Satan is treacherous, deceptive, and amoral. 5. Numerical I'm having trouble following the organization, but I'm not Hebrew expert. If that's the case, I guess I'll have to drop this argument. I'd appreciate if my opponent takes the time to organize that paragraph better. To conclude, my opponent has been unintentionally missing the bullseye. He has been making arguments and hitting around that area, but he will never nail it if he doesn't address the argument in conjuction with fulfilling his burden of proof. I guess 5000 yards is just too far of a target? Hahaha. .. extended metaphors.