A believer in liberty should be against a Palestinian state

This is a debate topic much older than either of us. What your getting at is a deep and fundamental contradiction in terms. I don't want to get personal but intuition tells me that you are asking a question in the that debate. There seemed to be conflicting thoughts about the rights of person v. the rights of people. This is a very very old contradiction in modern terms there are views that stretch the gambit from the Extreme Collectivist that believes the individual has no rights to the extreme individualist who believes collective responsibility as a concept is fascist. The question of rights is an Axiom, a question that is indivisible, it can become bigger but cannot become smaller, indivisible. Ground floor argument. Unfortunately its not the original debate we intended to have, though I would love to have a specific debate with you about collective v. individual rights and responsibilities. To give you a better understanding of why Palestine forbids the sale of land to Israeli citizens ( but not explicitly to Jewish faith) I refer you to the following map : -Source : Center for nationalist studies. Currently, the right wing party in power in Israel supports annexation of the remaining Palestinian territory. ( by the way, that little "strip" of land in the south-west is Gaza) And I refer you to: http://www.washingtonpost.com... So,lets pretend for a moment that the fox-news narrative in the U.S. is on par and that Israeli is not expansionist ( look, there is a unicorn, they are real here.) With this map in mind, there is a Israeli acquisition of land that is undeniable- Palestine is in a sticky position, its territorial claims are in a kind of legal limbo...Israel which has as many lobbyists in the United states as oil companies http://en.wikipedia.org.... Faces a tough spot where its very existence is only-semi recognized. Palestine in short, faces existential crisis and it faces such at the hands of Israel. So mind you, your own source ( http://en.wikipedia.org... ) Defines the criteria for exclusion not as being a "Jew" but as being citizen-and-or-agent of the Israeli state from purchasing Palestinian land. I would hope that seeing the graphic evidence of Israeli territorial claims will shine some light on the necessity of such policies. As for the 2nd source, this is a site I have never heard of before, which is fine by itself but when I investigated I found several cardinal sins for a source site... As follows: (1) Alot of self referencing ( sourcing other articles on the same site as source material for another article) (2) Dead links ( more than is acceptable)(3) Obscure external links ( links to equally unknown sources linked in articles) But for arguments sake, lets say Palestinian Authorities ( not an actual government) did teach their kids to hate Israel. Knowing the History of Israel, how it was created by what we call today, radical separatists ( http://en.wikipedia.org... ) With a declaration of Independence ( http://en.wikipedia.org...) that caused a war (http://en.wikipedia.org...) Supported by the U.N ( http://en.wikipedia.org... ) on land that was carved up under British Rule ( http://www.princeton.edu...) and fought by an army backed by British powers, but was previously recognized as a terrorist organization ( http://en.wikipedia.org...) Can you Blame Palestine is there is some bad blood? Should a "Believer in liberty" really be touching this conflict with a 10ft pole, attached to a crane arm,operated by remote control-from the moon? NO