The Resurrection of Jesus is possible

Ok in the first 3 rounds we will go back and forth, and in the last round we will make conclusion statements. I will open with statements. I'm asserting that the resurrection of Jesus is definitely possible due to several reasons A) the apostles were inspired to go out and lay down their lives for their cause. 11 out of 12 of the apostles died by execution, and one was exiled. They traveled as far as India and Ukraine to spread the church. So here, their dedication and desire to spread the faith is unquestionably strong. No normal person would go out and proclaim a false teaching to their death without serious mental heath problems. These people were clearly affected by the events surrounding the death of Jesus and went to vast lengths to tell people about it. So, now that it is established that the apostles were extremely affected by this event and died for it, the question arises of why they would do such things if they knew it didn't happen or if they heard only rumors. There must have been a certain event that seemed worthy enough to die (and be tortured) for. B) there are multiple independent writings and sources that attest to such works. This is called the bible. While I seems Jesus, Moses, and all of the popes got together and schemed the bible together, it is actually just an assembly of independent books that attest to Jesus. Which means yes, the gospels (more the synoptic vs johns, not necessarily all totally original) and the books of the New Testament and mostly different authors. Different and multiple people wrote about the event, most without other biblical references. Different people also had separate experiences with the resurrected Jesus. Even non biblical books, such as the Babylonian Talmud (essentially history of Judaism) express the belief that something more was going on. The Talmud specifically spoke of Jesus' "sorcery" and how it drew jews towards him. C) the account has Jesus buried by Joseph of arimathea, and found by women. Since Joseph of arimathea was a member of the Sanhedrin, the apostles would have been hostile to him and his beliefs, so it is unlikely that they would write that down if it wasn't true. The gospel account has Jesus' tomb being discovered by a woman, a strong contrast to other stories of heroes and legends of the time. Women were not in Jesus' inner 12, and did not do much in terms of theology during the life of Jesus. And adding to that was their status in society at the time, which was second class to say the least. All this would have made it very embarrassing for a gospel writer to have a woman discover the tomb. If it was false, and made up, it may as well be Peter of Paul. But instead, the gospels depict them hiding out, while the women find the tomb. This makes it more likely that they weren't lying. D) Jesus never specifically said "I will rise from the dead" in a very literal sense during the gospels (unlike the eucharist), so it would not be necessary for that to be a part of the theology for it to spread. The apostles had no bible to reference passages that could foreshadow the resurrection. Also, in other large religions, the leaders died also. Muhammad died, Buddha died, and so on. While their followers may have been sad, the religions/philosophies spread anyway. So, that means it would not have been necessary for christianity to have a resurrection story, and the apostles could have gone out anyway and spread the word about his life. But no, they specifically went about preaching the resurrection, and died for it. They went to great lengths to profess this, when if it was a lie, it would not have necessarily been needed anyway for a religion to develop