moon landing is a hoax

my opponent has taught me many lesson in his argument which i think not only i but nobody else could ever imagine.1] lesson 1: flag wavingtill date i know that it is wind which moves things. my opponent boldly taught me that Air is not what causes objects to move.these are actually caused by the gravitational attraction between the particles of the two objects. well then we think that we don't need to move anything by force. things will move by the gravitational attraction between the particles of the two objects.that means if there are 2 objects, say A and B situated side by side, then without any kind of interferance object A will move towards object B because particles of these 2 objects attract each other.following this line of logic you can say that in this world nobody actually hurts nobody. if A hurts B with a knife, A is not guilty because A is helpless. it is the gravitational pull between particle of kinfe and B's body.so flag can be moved in an airless space by gravitational pool. this kind of explanation, for weak people like me, is very hard to digest. so i refuse to accept it. i think only to show that man landed on the moon, this kind of explanation was invented.2] lesson 2: landing crateratmospheric setting of moon and earth are different so we should not judge luner event on the basis of earth events. this line of logic will make anything possible in the moon which is impossible on earth. there will be no way to test the validity of the luner events. we have to accept it as presented to us. so we should not buy this line of logic.rocket expert bill kaysing said that actually rocket engines release 10000 pounds of jet that could move big rock bolders accross the land. from this fact we can understand that this same jet released by apollo on moon could create huge crater on moon.since atmospheric settings are different, then we can assume at least some scratch on ground should be there if not a big landing crater. there is not even a scratch on ground. it as if apollo landed with a parashute on the moon. it just can't make sense.source:http://www.youtube.com...3] lesson 3: Different Lightinglight from reflection is still light! so what? in movie studio isn't still light used? this lighting strengthen the point that moon landing was fake.4] lesson 4: Lack of Starsall you are saying are explanation given by nasa. so i am not trusting those things. why they don't use a better camera? don't they know that stars in the sky of the moon are also valuable scene? or are they using such kind of low grade camera just to deceive the audience?5] lesson 5:nasa is govt. agencythis claim has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. no sir, this is the point. i thank you for agreeing with me. if nasa is funded by govt. and is a govt. agency like CIA or FBI then it can do anything govt. wants it to do. this point cast a shadow of doubt over nasa.6] lesson 6: medical knowledgeThe Gemini Program demonstrated the capability […] to support lunar landing and to enhance flight and ground crew operational experience. this statment is vague because it doesn't show how or what gemini programme teaches nasa that lunar landing is possible.7] lesson 7:Space Racei think russia failed to land on moon not because of failure of N1 rocket but because of economic crisis soviet union faces. success of america, after all these points is questionable.one more new argument.....1] distance and speedthe distance between earth and moon is such that If you could fly to the Moon at a constant speed of 1000 kilometers per hour, which is the speed of a fast passenger jet, it would take sixteen days to get there. Apollo astronauts reached the Moon in less than four days. how is that possible? do they have technology faster than fast passenger jet in those days? besides earth-moon distances varies with moon's psition:prigee, mean, apogee. here are distances moon from earth in those phase:Perigee 363,300 kmMean 384,400 kmApogee 405,500 km we don't know what was moon's phase or distance at the time of apollo? in either case apollo could not make it in less than four days anyway.source:http://www.freemars.org...