Evolution is incorrect

Fitst off, I would like to point out that the methods you are relying on for dating is flawed (i know you didn't use carbon dating directly, but i will adress it anyway). Isochron dating is a method of dating that relies on two assumtions. These two assumtions are: "The amount of daughter isotope at the time of formation of the sample is zero (or known independently and can be compensated for)", and "No parent isotope or daughter isotope has entered or left the sample since its time of formation." (http://www.talkorigins.org...) These two assumtions are the downfall of this dating method, simply because "If one of these assumptions has been violated, the simple computation above yields an incorrect age.". (ibid) Now, consider the second assumtion, and then consider the supposed age of what your dating; 4.5 billion years would be an awfully long time for the parent/daughter isotope to vary and therefore produce a flawed age, don't you think? You also mentioned carbon dating, which, like you said, is similar to isochron dating. However, it is also unreliable for dating objects said to be "5 million years old" or so. Scientists, both creationists and evolutionists, agree that carbon dating in unreliable for dating objects any older than 50,000 years. In addition, carbon dating is intended for dating materials such as wood, cloth, and paper, not fossils and rocks. Now lets look at something else, namely the strata of the earth. Evolutionists say that strata (like the strata revieled in the grand canyon for instance) could have only been layed down over millions of years, however we have all seen what volcanos and flood waters can do in days, and even HOURS. Take for instance Mt. Saint Helens and it's last eruption. In a matter of hours, 9 to be precise, it layed down 600 feet of sediment at it's base. Well, that would be a good possible explanation for the strata around volcanos, but what about the strata all over the rest of the world? They're so dense they must have taken billions of years, right? Well, what about flood waters? Yes, i AM suggesting the possibility of a world-wide flood. In small scale floods, dirt, sand, and rocks are picked up and carried all over by the water, but when the water stops moving and begins to receed, all of the sedement begins to sink to the bottom. When this happens, if the sedement layer are allowed to dry, one would find that they are quite densly packed after only a few days. This is an example of a flood that lasts only a few days, but what about a flood that lasted almost a year? The Bible, the Quran, and many other cultures all over the world have at least a vague account of a world wide flood, but the Bible and the Quran are espesially specific. In the Bible, Genesis 7 give an account of what is obviously a world wide-flood, spacifically verses 18 and 19 which state: "The waters rose and increased greatly on th earth, and the ark floated on the surface of the water. They rose greatly on the earth, and all the high mountains under the entire heavens were covered." The Quran states: "At length, behold! There came Our Command, and the fountains of the EARTH gushed forth! We said: `Embark therein, of each two, male and female, and your family- except those against whom the Word has already gone forth,- and the believers.' But only a few believed with him." S. 11:40 Also muslim historians believe in a flood that covered the world. According to Ibn Humayd- Salamah- Ibn Isahq- al-Hassan b. Dinar- Ali b. Zayd- Yusuf b. Mihran- Ibn Abbas: I [Yusuf b. Mihran] heard him [Ibn Abbas] say: ... The water increased wildly, and, as is assumed by the people of the Torah, rose fifteen cubits over the mountain tops. ALL CREATURES ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH, EVERY INSPIRITED BEING OR TREE, DISSAPEARED. NO CREATURE REMAINED EXCEPT NOAH AND THOSE WITH HIM IN THE BOAT, as well as Og b. Anak, as is assumed by the people of the Book. The time between God's sending the Flood and the receding of the water in six months and ten nights. (History of al-Tabari [State University of New York Press; Albany, NY 1989], pp. 360-361) (http://www.answering-islam.de...) Now think about it; the Bible says that the flood covered all of the mountains, and muslim historians say that it killed everything and everyone except Noah, the animals on the ark, and a few who were with Noah. This was a BIG flood. Both account agree that it lasted anywhere between 110 and 180 days, so there would be plenty of time for the sediment to settle. A flood of this size would easily explain how the strata said to be millions of years old could form in a matter of months, and if the dating methods that evolutionists use are flawed, then it would be impossible to prove that the objects buried in the strata are millions of years old. Creation scientists have dated the earth to be around 6000 years old, and if in fact the accounts of the Quran and the Bible are correct and there was a world-wide flood, it be a very credible excplanation for the laying down of so many strata in so little time.