Junk Food should be banned from schools

I will first rebut the counterplan of my opponent's. I will rebut my opponent's third round in this round. I will first start with his observations.CounterplanMy opponent's counterplan is that we should limit 2 junk foods per day. It won't work. Did you ever think that schools will even care? It would be a waste of time to count two junk foods, when you can just ban them, which is much easier. And, kids would bring more. Do you think that kids will follow the rules when they don't check? No. Even though they might check, there are hundreds of students, so they can't do all. Because of this, my opponent's plan fails.Observations1. My opponent says that it is Con's framework v.s. No framework. My opponent says that voters should not care about my crticisms on the framework. I actually made my framework when doing that and said that concentration is the key to education, saying that happiness is not the most important, and if one of us prove that 2 or 3 people, children, parents, or the government are happy, then we ban or don't ban junk food.2. My opponent says that it is uneccesary and spam. It's actually is not.3. My opponent says it is unfair to put it in the comments. I never said to my opponent to not put it in the comments. Also, almost everyone does it. I can put it in this round to make it fair. But it is fair to do it. Alternatives (Plan)My opponent says that he never banned healthy fodos. That wasn't the point of the argument. The plan was that junk foods are not neccesary the main point of junk food is the taste. However, I showed 13 foods which are tastier that junk food, meaning that junk food is uneccasary. My opponent shows a plate on what we need to eat, and the percentage. He says that there is still a small part for high in sugar and fat. Is junk food the only one with them? No.My opponent says that children mostly eat both junk food and healthy food. He says that is how schools are set out. All 3 schools when I was in America, the children only brought brownies for snack and hamburgers, which is fast food, and junk food. The 2 schools I went in Korea also did this. Now in France, they still only bring mostly junk food. Even my brother who is in 11th grade agrees. All the schools he went, which is 7 (one more than me) he had the same things. So, most schools actually let children eat all junk food. That is why we should ban junk food. Schools aren't doing this well, and they will never do it.My opponent suddenly says a balanced diet of both. It is more healthy foods in the plate. Children's HealthMy opponent says that he will limit 2 junk foods per day. He concedes that junk food is bad for a child's health. I do think that the list was wrong, put french fries are fast food, and fast food is junk food. high calorie coffe drinks are high in sugar. My opponent says that fat definciences cause many bad things. However, I showed you much more things of what happenes to you if we permit junk food, and my opponent fails to rebut that. I already told 3 times that they won't let children only eat 2 items. And as I said, junk food is addicting, so it is basically, lots of junk food or no junk food. I prefer no junk food.ConclusionThere are 3 ways this goes like.1. We ban junk food2. We permit 23. We permit all we want.Choice number two is very low in standards. Choice number 3 is very very very unhealthy. Choice 1 is the best. Fat isn't only in junk food. It is also in many other foods. Therefore, voters must decide 1, because it is the best, and most justified point. For these reasons, vote for PRO!!!!