Abortion: right or wrong.

Sir im glad you will leave religion out of this it makes me very happy and i promise being agnostic shall hold no baring with me on this topic! Now on to you attempting to tear apart my argument that i posted against yours earlier one i have to tell you that you changed some words around in your definition of murder to make yourself seem slightly better on the issue i say good job and i will not rewrite what you have said with out your consent second of all I am a Male so you addressing me as her is very rude and distasteful if you had even glanced at my profile you would have seen i am a man but now that i have gotten past the few parts of your introduction to our topic that bugged me i shall move on with the debate. Murder is defined as and i quote "is the unlawful killing of a human person with malice". So i am afraid i got technical there but it had to be done so as of right now no one can consider abortion murder why because as of right now it is not unlawful so i would thank you to stop using that as such a strong point in your case when in actuality it has no place. Instead of bickering over whether the embryo which it is called until it has shown defined signs of being a human is in fact a human life because it is up to each person to decide when they think it is a human life. Now onto to the next point you say we should have a law that holds exceptions and i full heartedly agree with that i do not believe a woman should be able to abort the child after the first four weeks because the embryo has transformed into a fetus even though its extremely underdeveloped it still has human qualities to limit abortion only to a select few is also unequal its like saying your family is not entitled to your pension in the army because you were not forced to go but choose to on your own accord and i am not saying abortion is right by any means all im saying is give woman the choice so that the child's life along with the parents lives are not destroyed why bring another life into the world if all its going to receive is neglect malnutrition and resentment from its parents to me that is saving the child's life. and about my comment on hunting if you would have included your whole statement i feel people would have understood why i put it in but seeing the limited character count i understand why you did not. now on to the overpopulation issue you say people with terminal illness should just be left where they drop and we should not help them if are planet is over populated you use the thought that it is costly and hurts the economy and its better to let them die then to not allow a possible life first off it does not hurt the economy if anything it beefs it up because the people who are not left where they drop are those who can afford it the government does not pay for procedures and overly expensive medication most insurance companies don't even pay for that so i say its a good thing to help them because it may lead to a cure or new forms of medicine and it does help the economy and i believe the abortion of embryos does the same thing helps the economy and through stem cell research could save thousands of lives while keeping our population levels and a safe amount. if you just let the other people die then there is no money being pumped into new medical treatments and no new treatments will ever be discovered so i view the abortion of an embryo a much better solution than just leaving an injured man where he falls. Now i must emphasis something and that is that i am pro choice plain and simple not necessarily pro abortion. I am for keeping abortion legal and giving woman the choice on what they do I also think that laws should be a slight bit stricter on this such as no abortions past the first four weeks and so on but it should be open to everyone and think that is the only way to effectively put restrictions on abortion but still make the law equal for everyone.