Was Jesus resurrected

Ok, first, source please! You cannot spout of stuff like "Historians ALL agree on blah blah blah" without sources and references! Your so called "facts" are as good as the anecdotal evidence Jesus disciples gave! And even if I did take your word for it, I would say that firstly, five different people mentioning Jesus crucifixion has nothing to do with his supposed resurrection! Furthermore, historian "facts" are not completely infallible, but are simply something that most historians agree on (which is not reliable, as many people 500 years ago believed the earth was flat, so the number of believers has nothing to do with how true it is. This is a bandwagon fallacy. On to your next point: "In ancient time if you had 2 independent sources mentioning an event it would be counted as a historical facts. A lot of historical facts are based on 2 independent sources. We have 5 mentioning the crucifixion of Jesus." You admit this has nothing to do with the discussion and is not convincing, so I'm baffled as to why you put this in your argument. But let me break down your other points and give simpler explanations for them: "1) Jesus was buried by Joseph of Armathia after his crucifixion" So? This doesn't support your claim at all. "2) Jesus' s tomb was found empty by a group of women the Sunday following the crucifixion" Again, so? Jesus was known for being a magic man throughout Israel (true or not), so grave robbers would have been salivating over his death! Or even simpler, maybe his disciples took his body and made up the rest? Who knows!? "3) Multiple individuals have experienced appearances of Jesus alive after his death (not only his disciples but skeptics and even enemies)" And this is written in a book 2000 odd years ago, so no, this is not a convincing argument for his resurrection. "4) The disciples genuinely came to believe in the resurrection despite having every disposition of it: - The Jewish theology prohibits a dying messiah, the messiah is not supposed to die - In Judaism, there's a general resurrection of everybody, there is not supposed to be the resurrection of one man - The Jewish theology certainly does not predict a single resurrection of the messiah after he dies - So the belief in the resurrection is unlikely to have been invented - Disciples were willing to get killed and go to hell for that belief in the resurrection" Ok, firstly, controversial books have been around for donkeys years. Good modern examples are fifty shades of grey, or even the satanic bible. Simply because a book or story is not in a majority's favour, does not make it convincing or true. Secondly, I rolled my eyes at your second point that said "In Judaism, there's a general resurrection of everybody..." The Jews didn't solidly believe in the resurrection. In fact, Sadducees (a movement of Judaism) didn't believe in a general resurrection of everybody at all, whereas Pharisees (another group) did. Ancient Judaism had many different opinions and was often subject to interpretation. Finally, you last argument that Jesus disciples were willing to go to hell is flawed. Firstly, Im guessing you mean everlasting torment when you say hell, which is not according to Jewish beliefs. Secondly, this argument does not make me want to believe in Jesus resurrection at all. People who murder often know they will go to jail for it, yet do it anyway. Simply because they knew they were doing something unpopular and likely to get them killed, does not mean Jesus was actually resurrected. I also want to add a point about the guards at Jesus tomb. This detail is ONLY found in the gospel book Mathew. This detail is found in no other gospel or book. Therefore, this detail seemed to be added into the sorry to make hoaxes or grave robbery less likely,