BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Canadian is sillier than France.

'="^="9""ף$&"*#&4$&"*#&499,,`32;9,,`32;;旭化成建材{95;|24;|27;{67;{56;打{85;工事A299;A296;A300;A296;件{98;中{95;z89;同社{64;{67;{56;|34;打{87;{90;{56;{94;{56;同市内{98;終末処理場{98;工事{64;含|14;{56;{83;大分県中津市{99;A298;A302;日z89;工事{95;旭化成建材{64;&306;与{75;{90;{56;{83;{71;{92;|34;明|25;{63;{95;{75;{83;z90;z88;市{95;|24;|27;{92;z89;B分場{98;!073;硫{94;{93;{98;#013;置A298;機|34;固定{77;|27;99,,`32;9,,`32;;|28;{90;{56;{83;{92;発"920;{75;{90;|28;{90;{56;{83;指揮者{99;国内外{91;活$493;{77;|27;大友直人{73;|35;A288;A301;A303;A289;z90;{00;!258;分{98;曲|34;広|17;{83;{56;{01;{92;'000;{58;加"276;{73;|35;{98;夢|34;知{87;{83;}00;|50;|94;{98;恩師|25;{64;企画{75;{83;z90;{04;宇多川{99;|27;{63;{05;
Should Kids Have Laptops in Schools

Kids should not have laptops in school. Contention 1- Laptops have access to porn It's been shown that kids who see porn develop unhealthy attitudes towards sex.[1] Contention 2- The Internet has bad information If a teacher is trying to teach the kids about how the pyramids were built and the kid came across a website on aliens building the pyramids it may take kids off subject. [2] This unneccesary distraction could take valuable time away from learning the curriculum and affect standardized testing grades. As you can see laptops in school is a very bad thing vote con. Sources [1] http://www.apa.org... [2] http://www.alien-ufos.com...
not clear, what minimal faith is needed for salvation, for christians

i do see your points, in the "gist" of what's required. probably the best argument against me for this debate, which i've debated many times. id just point out that "believe in" is very vaque. demons might be able to understand taht Jesus saves and in some sense "believes in Him". but they don't "rely" or whatever else you wanted to qualify. (all as i pointed out earlier) but once we get into actually specifiing so it's not too vague or too listy, suddenly you see the whole essence of my argument.
not clear, what minimal faith is needed for salvation, for christians

what the absolute minimum needed to believe is not clear. this debate is beyond the "faith v works" debate and is simply in the realm of what faith is required to be saved. i am not saying this in terms of seeking to do or believe the minimum such as to "do as little as i have to to get saved". i ask christians and they say "believe in jesus". then i point out that the devil does as even the bible says. so they say believe he's your savior. then i point out that some believe that different people see that differently... a good message or atonement etc. a fundamentalist would say a good message is not sufficient. so... you have to believe in atonement is one element. but then there's various beliefs in atonement, "christus victor" v "substitionary" etc. but then the bible has lots of places where it says what to believe. "confess with your lips that he is lord and believe that he has risen and you will be saved". that doesn't really define what "Lord" is though, thoug h in any case all this atonement stuff may not be necessary after all. but what if they do beleive in atonement and all this other stuff, but dont' know to believe that he was risen? or what if they find that piece of evidence insufficient for belief but believe everything else? most christians just say "believe he's savior and you're good". and what if you don't like this "savior" stuff given it's a loaded word. what if you just "relied" on Jesus instead, and acknowledged that you're a sinner, wouldn't that be enough? well it's not confesing and beleiving all that stuff, though no one said that was teh end all be all of what's required. some don't believe he's god... is that okay? a dogamatic would start to list things you must believe. then i point out that that's dogmatic, and most would shy away from that. if it's too short though, they don't like the vagueness or the possibilities they are forgoing for the sake of an easy answer... it's a brutal issue when you get down to it. they want to have their cake... easy answer... and eat it too.. not giving a clear answer. you have people who are new to the religion and one wouldn think couldn't be held responsible to everything to a T, and you have those who have honest disagreements over what doctrines should be belieeved and what shouldn't. and even if they knew of one doctrine that is considered standard and rejected what tehy knew... what is the minimum they'd have to believe? they can do the "confess with your mouth" stuff and reject say the trinity and be condemned for it? basically everyone is at different stages. it seems the right conclusion is it depends on hwere you are in your walk. so... beyond the whole faith v works debate.. even in terms of faith... what one must believe is not clear or taught very well.
Morgan Freeman Jokes

Note: Since I think two jokes per round is a bit short I'll change it to four.The first time Morgan Freeman saw himself cry in the mirror, he became an old man, and stayed that way his whole life. Ever since then, every time Morgan Freeman cried, it rained in heavan.Every time when you have diarrhea, Morgan Freeman narrates it, so you appear nobel. In fact, the only reason that you're alive today, JustinAMoffat, is because Morgan Freeman narrated your birth!Morgan Freeman invented peguins; when he narrates an animal or any creature in a documentary, nature makes it so.Morgan Freeman has to go through about 5 microphones a day, since once he's done with them, they turn into bars of gold. He uses this profit to create a real Santa Claus, and to research how he created a president with an IQ of 40 through his narration. ( In case that was too ambiguous, I meant George Bush) :)On to you now, JustinAMoffat.
Morgan Freeman Jokes

Debate ProcedureRound 1: Acceptance and Morgan Freeman quoteRound 2,3: Two jokes about Morgan Freeman, not insulting himRound 4: made-up Morgan Freeman storyGood luck to my opponent. This is for all those Morgan Freeman fans out there! :)Learning how to be still, to really be still and let life happen - that stillness becomes a radiance. [1]-Morgan FreemanVoting: All other categories will be ignored and arguments will be given to the funniest jokes.Source: http://www.brainyquote.com...
Morgan Freeman Jokes

...Morgan Freeman narrated this very story. He touched it with his voice like that of an angel and forever blessed it so that you, and all who know the sound of Morgan Freeman's voice, shall forever read this in your head in his voice. This special effect he had on stories with his voice, was so powerful that some worshipped him as a god. They were called Free Men, but they all were wiped out by a mass suicide upon hearing the rumors of Morgan Freeman's death. Ever since then, Morgan Freeman has not allowed people to worship him, nor has he allowed the internet to function without his okay, so as to prevent more misinformation. This delay/obstruction between the world-wide web and your computer is Morgan Freeman's voice... or, as it is commonly known, buffering, loading, and or website maintenance. Ever since then, Morgan Freeman has decided to narrate movies and historical stories so as to keep you entertained, happy, and relaxed. Thi is how he got into narrating. In fact, Morgan Freeman narrated this very story.Thank you to my opponent. This was perhaps the strangest debate I've ever taken a part of.
Morgan Freeman Jokes

Morgan Freeman and his friend once had a bet: If Morgan freeman could still make someone happy even if he were to be incredibly rude . One day Morgan Freeman had an affair with a single young mother. The mother's son can hear grunts oming frhe mother is March of the Pengins. The mother yells: "Oh Morgan! Unh! " Morgan Freeman then comes out of the room and says: " Son, I just did your mother" (even though he didn't). Tears then start weing up in the boys eyes, Morgan freeman is ashamed of what he's done, he shouldn't have done this. But then the boy says: "Thank you Morgan Freeman, but that's actually my dad, he always wanted to be accompanied but a nice black man. " Morgan Freeman then hugs the boy and gives him a kitten as a gift. Damn it, says Moses looking through his binoculars.
Morgan Freeman Jokes

Morgan Freeman's voice is so soothing, he could inform you he had just slowly skinned your family with a butter knife... and you'd still feel relaxed.It is widely accepted that the best way to die ever is to be shot by Clint Eastwood while Morgan Freeman narrates the event.Sometimes Morgan Freeman talks in his sleep... and when he wakes up, he's floating in a cloud bed a sea of maple syrup and swimming puppies.Historians millenia from now will look back on this period and credit Morgan Freeman as the most prolific man of our time. This is not because of what he has said, but more so that he has been credited with practically every quote known to mankind. Because everyone loves to here Morgan Freeman's voice narrating things. You're imagining reading this in his voice right now. Titty sprinkles.
Morgan Freeman Jokes

Morgan Freeman cannot re-clone, since that would require unicorn tears.Morgan Freeman has a silky, velvety voice that is responsible for many great things in this universe. However, his voice sometimes creates tsunamis and earthquakes because of mother nature having an orgasm when listening to March of the Penguins.Once Chuck Norris lost a game of tic-tac-toe to Morgan Freeman. Chuck Norris then invented racism to get back at him. My opponent is absolutely correct, Morgan Freeman did narrate his own birth. His exact words were this: I, Morgan Freeman leave my mother's comforting womb. Soon I will make my first poop, one of the many poops in the lifetime of Morgan Freeman.
Morgan Freeman Jokes

Morgan Freeman doesn't have sex. He just smiles at a woman and a baby appears in a field of sunshine and kittens.Morgan Freeman began his narrating career at a young age, when he narrated his own birth.Morgan Freeman's friends just call him "God".Morgan Freeman once turned down a role in Jurassic Park because he thought the idea of movie about dinosaurs was silly - going so far as to refer to the prehistoric animals as "damn beasts." Dinosaurs - being surprisingly sensitive creatures, depsite their bellies full of caveman flesh - promptly gave up on living. Scientists sometimes refer to this theory as "not reputable," "completely made up" or simply "entirely illogical, nonsensical and insulting."Thank you.
Resolved: Disney World should continue to host its "gay days."

Thank you for posting.Why is homosexualitty an adult topic? Well first of all, what is homosexuality? Homosexuality is that sexual orientation that makes one sexually attracted to those of their same gender. (1) It is a sexual topic. Sex is an adult topic. Children are not mature enough to understand sex.Children: My opponent then goes on to say that childhood is one of the most critical learning periods. I agree, but homosexuality is an adult topic. 4 year olds don't need to know about sex.Discrimination: Sorry for not developing my point. The reason why it is discrimination is that no other sexualities get their own day. Asexuals don't get their own day. Hetrosexuals don't get their own day. Only homosexuals get their own day. My opponent says that gay days promode that homosexuality is equal to the other sexualities. But giving one sexuality its own day and the other not is not equality.Purpose: Yes there are nothing prohibiting them. But this is about if they should, not if they could.Gay pride: The difference is that it is not in a child-themed park that's purpose is to entertain and not show political messages. Yes, children could be exposed to it, but it is not in a park aimed for children. Celebrating homosexuality in front of 4 year olds is not educating them. Teaching older kids in school is.Look here for a list of all the events: http://en.wikipedia.org...Economy: One day would not help the economy much. Yes, the amount of people accepting homosexuality is increasing, but that does not mean they think it should be celebrated in park aimed at children. Take me in example. I accept homosexuality, but I do not think it should be celebrated in a child-themed park. Conclusion: Celebrating homosexuality in a park aimed for children is innapropriate, discrimination to the other sexualities, and there are many alternatives.Sources 1. http://dictionary.reference.com...2. http://en.wikipedia.org...
Resolved: Disney World should continue to host its "gay days."

Thank you for postingContentionsContention 1: Children Disney world is a children themed park. Homosexuality is an adult topic. Kids these days are taught about sex in 8th grade. It is not appropriate to advertise homosexuals in front of 4 year old.Contention 2: DiscriminationSeriously, by doing this, Disney world is advertising homosexuality above other sexualities. Why does one sexuality get it's own day while the others don't? This is unfair.Contention 3: Purpose The purpose of Disney world is to entertain, and not show political messages. Rebuttals Rebuttal: Gay prideYes, I get the concept of gay pride. But that is why there are such things as gay pride parades, that are not in the center of a child themed park. Gay pride parades and other events also have the benefits you listed, but is not in a child themed park for 4 year old. Alternative events with same benefits Gay pride paradesEducating people about thisGay pride festivalsThe list goes on.Rebuttal: Economy Yes, and they also scare people away.People that would not go that day:Parents who don't want their 4 year old children exposed to adult subjectsConservativesFundamentalistsBigotsPeople who don't want a whole day celebrating someone's sexuality.Also, the amount of preparation would take so much money.http://sitemaker.umich.edu... http://www.wdwinfo.com...
DDO three debate requirement to vote

DDO should have 3 debates, and possibly moreC1) It stops people from doing what you are doingThat is spamming 1 round debates to earn voting privileges. C2) It limits multi accountingIt makes it more difficult on people if they try and cheat and vote for themselves. C3) It gets people adjusted to the site, teaches them how to debate, and gives them time to understand how to vote according to site regulationsThis speaks for itself. EndingDDO should keep it he way it is.
lgbt

I said I have no respect for transgender who get surgery to change their appearance, I probably should of said it better. There is a thing that describes Transgender : "Gender Identity Euphoria" ,it is a mental disease. And I find it terrible that at a young age kids can decide what gender they associate with. Kids are way to young to make these decisions. The reason young kids make these decisions is because they have to take a pill that changes their puberty processes, can't do that after puberty because it all ready happened. That is all I'm going to say on this debate. I have other things to worry about and wont finish the debate. I'm tired of people telling me to stop hating on these people. I'll just leave LGBT a personal religious matter. I don't believe that LGBT marriage should be legal, but that it a personal at this point. I'm new to debating so I'm going to debate less controversial things so I don't get comments saying "stop hating" -You win
lgbt

My opponent asserts that "the purpose of marriage is to make a family", but doesn't substantiate this. Marriage is a civil, legal, and financial union between two adults, but the nature of their union is up to those involved. This point is thoroughly irrelevant to the issue of LGBTQ marriage, as we also allow infertile heterosexual couples to marry, as well as heterosexual couples who have no intention of having children. As con conveniently pointed out, homosexual couples may adopt children, and raise children that way. It is also possible for homosexual individuals to become biological parents through sperm donations or surrogates. Con once again asserts that children must have a male parent and a female parent, but does not substantiate this. Once again, this is wholly irrelevant to LGBTQ+ issues, as we allow single parents to raise children, or under unusual circumstances another individual (e.g. an aunt or uncle).Con confuses bisexuality with polyamory- a bisexual person is attracted to both men and women, while a polyamorous person has multiple sexual or romantic partners (all of which are aware of the others and accepting of this state). Bisexual individuals can be, and usually are, monogamous to one individual- they just don't mind whether that person is a man or a woman. A polyamorous person can be gay, straight, bi, or any other orientation. My opponent states that they have "No respect for transgender people" such as myself, but fails to give a coherent reason as to why. Hence, no refutation needed.I needn't expand on my earlier case, as con has not responded to it and ultimately has the burden of proof in this discussion- the default position is that something is not immoraly unless someone substantiates that it is, and con has not yet done this.
lgbt

L- lesbian: homosexual women. G- gay: homosexual people. B- bi-sexual T- transgender those are the definitions I got from the internet. I will go be each meaning and tell you my position on them. L&G- I think that humans were not meant to homosexual. The purpose of marriage is to make a family, and you can't do that with 2 men or 2 women. And Adoption is a terrible excuse for the "making a family argument" because A child should grow up with 2 parents, one female and one male. Each gender has different roles to play in the family. Having 2 same gender parents will leave one gender out of the equation. As far I know Gay and Lesbian mean the same thing, that is why I put both in this category. B- I don't even know why this is even a category. I think this is an excuse for people to not like one person then go with some else they like, even if they have a different gender. I don't know what else to say to this. .. . T- There is a politically incorrect way to categorize these people, "Gender Identity Euphoria". The fact that some people will go through surgery that will change their appearance and take pills that change your hormones to go through puberty as opposite gender, I have no respect for these people. I don't know anything about Queer so I'm not even going there. I would like to not bring religion in here because not everyone believes in that religion. This is my first political debate so I hope this is fun and good luck.
Should Trump Repeal ObamaCare

"Obamacare basically forces citizens in the U. S to acquire the care through private company and if they dont provide it you must purchase it on your own. if not you will be fined or penalized and the IRS will collect your pay. this does not help the regular person with this type of health care, however it usually makes them more in debt and more in stress. " First off the con did not answer my arguments I made, only made a claim about his. Therefore voters should vote neg. As a response to this claim, your interpretation of ObamaCare is completely false and you obviously did not do your research. ObamaCare is not a private company, it is from the Affordable Care Act in 2010 which allows people to go federal reimbursement if they have a disabled, veteran, or they are a middle class family. IT IS NOT A PRIVATE COMPANY! When you are able to be eligible for ObamaCare, you can get put on it. However the monthly fee is what is bothering people and that"s what I stated in my reasons below.
Should Trump Repeal ObamaCare

NOTE: Please be respectful Trump should not repeal ObamaCare REASON 1) Many ways to change it now, we shouldn't have to repeal it to solve REASON 2)10.3M people are under ObamaCare, including elderly and disabled and veterans. Getting rid of ObamaCare would put these people in the street SOURCE:http://money.cnn.com... REASON 3) Removing ObamaCare would hurt Trumps popularity, which is already at a staggering 33%, this could lead to a miscontrol in government
Jerry Rice was the best NFL player of all time

Arguments"Best" is defined as "of the highest quality, excellence, or standing." My opponent has not proven that Jerry Rice is necessarily better than the other NFL players. He did not even say a word about them. This is a very opinionated debate. It is my opponent's opinion that Jerry Rice is the "greatest player in NFL history." It is my opinion that Barack Obama is a great president. Do you agree? I do not expect you to agree. I am not a fan of football at all. However, this debate does not require a knowledge of football. I just need to recognize that this is an opinionated, unfounded debate. I just need to recognize that the burden of proof is on my opponent, not me. Also, I would like to warn texans14. He has been trolling debate.org lately and has ruined one of my debates: http://www.debate.org.... Let's look at another debate where he voted: http://www.debate.org.... His RFD is absolutely horrible and unworthy of this great side, debate.org. I just want him to be aware of the potential consequences of his actions, which will be him being removed from the site. Works Cited 1. http://dictionary.reference.com...;
Jerry Rice was the best NFL player of all time

An ApologyI would like to apologize to my opponent if my attacks were a little too harsh. If it seemed that I "rushed to judgement", I am sorry about that as well. If I lose the conduct points in the votes, I shall accept that. I was harsh with my opponent and I admit that fully. However, I just wanted to have a serious, mature debate, and perhaps I overreacted.ConclusionMy major point in this debate was simply that it is a matter of opinion who the greatest NFL player of all time was. However, "most successful" and "greatest" are not synonyms. Certain football fans have certain preferences, while others have other preferences. Everybody is different. Everybody prefers a different team, a different player, and a different style. My attacks were a little harsh, I apologize again, but I believe that my stance is the right one. I urge the voters to vote fairly.
Jerry Rice was the best NFL player of all time

http://m.pfref.com... Here's a link. By the way, I respect the way you operate on this site . However, you haven't actually provided any stats or even other players that would prove me wrong. You said that career stats do nothing. You aiming at the fact that I'm not right because this is an opinion debate . This doesn't make you right either, and at least I've provided information from a valid source to support my cause. And you say my style of debate is opinionated. Well, it's not as opinionated as what you advised me to do. You told me to talk about his moves and style, which is even more my opinion of whether I liked his moves or not. Most of all, I hate what you said in your first and last paragraphs. You are a veteran and I'm a rookie. Yes , I'm new to the site, but in no way shape or form am I new to debating. Again don't go rushing to judgement.