I will not contradict myself

21. Do you believe that the government should enforce minimum working conditions? No. 22. Do you have to answer questions that I ask in this debate correctly? Merriam-Webster defines "correctly" as "conforming to or agreeing with fact, logic, or known truth". http://www.merriam-webster.com... I also invoke the definition of "have to" put forward in my answer to question 11. My answers have to be internally consistent with each other, and in this sense must conform to logic. There is nothing in the rules that says that my answers must agree with "fact...or known truth". 23. Do you have to answer all questions that I ask in all this debate without contradiction? I once again invoke the definition of "have to" originally mentioned in my answer to question 11. There are provisions within the rules of this debate for you to ask 30 questions, all of which I have to answer without contradiction. There is no specific provision for what would happen were you to ask extra questions outside of this 30. Rule 8, however, says that: "If PRO is ever found to have contradicted himself in this debate, PRO loses." The best answer possible, therefore, is yes. 24. If a group of people unanimously vote for their government to levy an income tax upon them, then is it justified? No. For one member (or more) of that group might later change their mind. If they were to do so, then the majority would be forcing them to pay income tax, rather than them voluntarily paying income tax. 25. Should the government ban slavery in all cases? No. 26. Are you an anarchist? Merriam-Webster defines an anarchist as "a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power." http://www.merriam-webster.com... I contend that governmental authority is not justified, and so in that sense I agree with anarchist belief. When it comes to other authorities or established orders, etc., it depends on the specific authority, etc., in question. It would therefore not be accurate to label me comprehensively as an anarchist. 27. Do you have to answer any questions that I ask in this debate correctly? I invoke the definition of "have to" put forward in my answer to question 11, and the definition of "correctly" put forward in my answer to question 22. My answers have to be internally consistent with each other, and in this sense must conform to logic. There is nothing in the rules that says that any of my answers must agree with "fact...or known truth". 28. Do you have to answer any questions that I ask in all this debate without contradiction? I once again invoke the definition of "have to" originally mentioned in my answer to question 11. There are provisions within the rules of this debate for you to ask 30 questions, all of which I have to answer without contradiction. There is no specific provision for what would happen were you to ask extra questions outside of this 30. Rule 8, however, says that: "If PRO is ever found to have contradicted himself in this debate, PRO loses." The best answer possible, therefore, is yes. 29. Does Question 18 refer to any thread? Question 18 was: "Do you agree that the rights to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness (Property) ought to be protected by the government?" No thread was referred to in that question. 30. Can a person own an animal's hair? No.