Resolved: Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) confirm common ancestry (evidence for evolution)

Again evolution versus creation debate. Who ever said that evolution even occurred? Scientist's maybe and then a flock are formed. A flock of rams. When will people learn that evolution just can not even take part in life? I say "Evolution go to sleep and never awake again!" It is not the fact that evolution is being kept awake because it is true or reality but because men keep it alive and awake. I would state that anytime in my life I will see no change when I should have seen many. But I simply do not. When really I should I just don't. What makes evolution happen, what inspires evolution to begin? What does life go to do with competition? The Devil love competition and God loves co-operation. Evolution is packed with competition, and you may say "This is just what life is." But no it is not. Life is not violent as we are alive. Life is not cruel are we get along. What makes life like it is? Science is based and finds things which are true. Science was meant be God to be used not to not find Him but to find more about Him. Since this has not happened in the way God had originally planned. Science has trued a wrong turn and I clearly see that this wrong turn has posed evolution as a result. And others like the Big Bang. If we we're to stop evolution today and forget about it forever. The world would only become better. We would understand that God exists and we would understand why sin is evil. As we would not act animal like? With sexual desires or violent, fights or thievery. So I believe. Evolution is not even science; it defines science in fact to a belief system. Were one observable view becomes a belief view. Where micro evolution (kinds with in a species.) To macro evolution (one species jumps to the next.) With no real evidence that is like me flinging a rubber band into one direction, while videoing then editing the rubber band when landed and changing it into a rubber tire. When really just because a rubber band and a tire are both made from the soot from a tree you suggest that they are the same. Nothing in the way of nature can stop a rubber band and a tire from changing in to one another with out there being a define change process. Both are circle I suppose. Who decide on what fossils are what? Who can say this looks like this one so they must be related in some way. Which one is first? Which one evolved into which? Is it because one is larger and has larger bone fame? Or because they are further in the ground? Evolution can escape failing with ease. When I say this fossil is deeper than this one when they should not be. According to the creatures' age. Scientists would suggest there was softer ground or maybe this area was "flooded" And excuses like this are full up to the neck in evolution. As a reason why is always more likely then there being a completely different story, and from there escalation is born. Where one problem is found they include it with the entire planet, "There must have been a meteorite here about 65 million years ago." Because? So many dinosaurs have died at once. This simply is not the case at all. There is not evidence that the meteorite in Mexico wiped any dinosaur out. I think that the flood is perfectly reasonable rather than a meteorite. The chances and evidence are more on the floods side. (I will give link at the bottom.) When you say evolution what do you mean? I mean that when I say evolution I think of 3.3 billion year evolution. But I have never seen that happen, so why? I recon you have to consider that a science teacher at school and your self is responsible. Why does evolution exist? Could be a question. Why do creatures evolve from one species to another? I think that as humans are the only being with a conscience of time, and God made the universe for humans that time started when Adam was made. Yet Adam was around 30 but only seconds old. This alone could have set off the fact that people think earth/the universe is much older. As Adam new he was 30 not seconds old. This would have escalated in our DNA over a period of 6000 years, thus the flood adds to this effect. By think to wipe out all of those dinosaurs and other creatures must have taken millions of years. I suppose the meteorite only killed 10 dinosaurs then as in your case there should be trillions of bones and fossils of dinosaurs. When really the amount of fossils found matches the age of the earth. Not all just about the variation of fossils found. Yet God is too immense to say "God can not create only this much because my mind can not think up anymore." So time did not exist before humans so how do you link this with evolution if our "so called" ape relatives had no knowledge of time? One minute I do not know what time is then the next my knowledge of time is available? I can not see how this is at all possible. Can you? Like leaves on a tree they are not attached together and yet you compare the evolution of creature to a tree, and they are neither attached. You say they are related but are they? Because they look the same. Lion and tiger are both cats. Snake and rat and totally different and I would not say they are related in any amount of time. You put them further away from each other on the tree to make it seem more realistic. It would not make a difference how far they were apart as they are not related. Now with a loin and tiger it would matter how close they were apart as we know they are related. But which is more cats like the lion or the tiger? How can you decide what animal before that evolved into o the lion or the tiger? And as you go further down the cat family you will realise they are all as cat like as each other in till you reach a none cat completely. What I am saying is that there is no in-between species, you can give me the Pika but that is a rabbit. There has never been a creature which has had effort in which a group of scientists have disgusts which type of species a certain creature belongs into. Link in comments.