The lord our god is NOT one lord according to the bible therefore everything god is, is false

Sure"jealous" is god"s name. I mean after all you are a fundamentalist christian and since this is true you must take your bible at its word. But nah, this is only true when YOUR bible suits YOU and only you and only when you feel like it suits you and like every christian abomination, you chuck the rest that you feel like throwing into the trash because you do not feel like it somehow does not belong and that its not godly even though your god truly hates those that are gay, hates those that commit adultery, hates those that do not believe in him, hates those that curse at their parents, hates those that blaspheme, hates those that break the sabbath, etc etc etc and issues death warrants for them all. Hey he committed countless genocides, loves raped women, endorses slavery, commits countless abortions in which you as christians are so against so that"s a true super massive hypocritical contradiction, this god of yours also gives the commandment of "thou shalt not kill" and yet strangely with a zap zang and zowie, this god of yours kills so there"s another super massive hypocritical contradiction, and yet orders his henchmen to also kill for him. But no need to worry, your bible is filled with a good thousand or more super massive hypocritical contradictions and inconsistencies making your bible truly unreadable. But then again, no stupid ignorant god would ever rely on text as a source of communication, the worst form of communication possible so people like you can get it wrong. Gee. Mmmm wow can"t read, can yah snookums? Nope. Now let"s look at Psalm 111: 5-10 which is remarkably shoddy at best. 5 He hath given meat unto them that fear him: he will ever be mindful of his covenant. 6 He hath shewed his people the power of his works, that he may give them the heritage of the heathen. 7 The works of his hands are verity and judgment; all his commandments are sure. 8 They stand fast for ever and ever, and are done in truth and uprightness. 9 He sent redemption unto his people: he hath commanded his covenant for ever: holy and reverend is his name. 10 The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments: his praise endureth for ever. 1. With EX 34:14 it was god that said the verse. Here its someone else naming his "holy and reverend" is his name. BIG HUGE MONUMENTAL DIFFERENCE. 2. Fear him? Why should anybody "fear" a supreme deity that is supposed to be "loving"? But wait folks, this god character is the absolute furthest from loving and in fact a true terrorist, especially among children if there ever was one. But you have neatly chucked that part away to a big black blank hole and clearly have not read your bible for what it is. Oh and btw, there"s no such a thing as "fear of the lord is the beginning of wisdom" when nobody can even prove that this god even exists. What idiot is going to want to look over their shoulders ever second of every day saying to themselves "where and how did I f--k up. I hope I did the right thing today." Apples. Oranges. As usual, god"s sorry precious frail fragile jealous superior ego complex, in which your bible is entirely about and nothing else, has its loose stains. 'holy', 'awesome', and 'jealous' are just adjectives." Well if they are, to you especially, then why do you bother reading your bible. By that reasoning alone, then you MUST consider your entire bible to be a very long list of adjectives and nothing but. Oh and btw, no supreme deity would ---ever--- have the want, the need or desire for "jealousy". Jealousy is nothing but anger as disguised fear. Yep your god has also freely admitted to having anger, wrath, vengeance, rage, fury, evil. And yep according to you this god must have sent all those emotions down to man so in turn man could learn to hate. Great going god. Great going you for worshiping this thing with at least 1 billion dead all in the supposed "good" name of this god on the battlefields alone. And you think YOUR god is "love, kindness, care, harmony, peace"? Nope. If so, then why not have that from the start and never look back/ Nah your god loves hate and evil especially when he knowingly clings to those baggage emotions and there"s ---never--- been peace with god at the helm, only war, devastation, first comes power, then fear and then control. Try harder. Oh I did make an argument against the trinity, but you being a christian, CAN"T READ. And I will not go into ANY biblehub context as it is one of the worst sites there is on the internet, much less the planet in regards for anything that is useful. If you want to send me elsewhere, I may look at it. Now which video are you referring to? And of course moses was only one person. Gee that one seemed to have escaped me. "I simply put forth what seems the most natural way of understanding the words," Uh huh. See that is exactly why YOUR god would ---never--- use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible. This god of your, especially with his superior ego god complex that is blatantly clear throughout his entire bible and well as his jesus in which neither of them can be proved and in which jesus was false, are all about ego and nothing but. "once you recognise that it doesn't actually say 'one lord', as you quote it in the debate title. Neither does it say 'one god', or any such thing."OK I"m ending this debate because then according to you and only you and I"ve been doing this for 42+ years and you would know better than roughly 22,000 people that I"ve talked with, and according to every English translation that I have looked at, they all read "one" no matter which adjective YOU use on biblegateway.com in which I just went through to be sure - again -. And you and only you MUST know a lot better than them all. Oh and I also googled "Meyer"s NT Commentary" and guess what? He like all creationists are utter trash and can be tossed like a gutterball into a whoopie cushion voodoo doll who smirks at a painful rectal itch while painting smiley faces on rolls of t.p. for a living as ALL of them, no exceptions, are utterly worthless and garbage. Why? Because they cannot and will not under any circumstance stand behind their product, namely their god, when the pressure cooker is turned on at absolute zero. They are pretty smart, well at least smarter than you, in that they will ---never--- put their product on trial again. Why? Because they 100% know that they will lose every---single---time. That"s because with what rolls around in their little beanies with choppers on top, they know that all they have to go on is faith and faith cannot be proved. And they know that faith is NOT evidence of any kind. That"s all you have as well also. Because your bible isn"t evidence of any kind also. "Faith is the treason people give when they don"t have evidence." Matt Dillahunty NOTHING is established in scripture. That"s because the christian god, if remotely intelligent in which he is clearly not, would never use text as a source of communication, the worst form of communication possible so everybody can get it wrong as there"s been 0 updates in at least 2,000 years. There"s translations upon translations upon translations upon translations upon copies upon copies upon copies upon copies upon dead languages upon dead langanguages with absolutely 0% of a chance to trance it back to the original. And there"s no original in the first place! So absolutely nobody is interpreting correctly. http://www.youtube.com... - Christians don't understand the character of God "If god is all knowing and he knows the future of all events and he wrote a book that can only be interpreted as if it endorses slavery and if its heinous violence against your children against your neighbors" how could a god be that omnipotent and devise a book where we can"t distinguish between the law of Israel and god"s law? I mean their interwoven where we have metaphor and fact and nobody can distinguish the two. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take figuratively. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take literally. Was it actually a tree? I mean come on. How can anyone distinguish this. I mean come on. It doesn"t make any sense. It doesn"t matter how its translated. It doesn"t matter what version. If it was written by an omnipotent being there would be ONE VERSION. And there would be only ONE WAY to interpret it because it would be written well." Aron Ra Actually it wouldn"t be written at all. What"s wrong with your god comin" down and talking to people? "Hey you know some of that stuff that"s in the book? I"m here to correct it." Matt Dillahunty http://www.youtube.com... -The god that christians believe in is amazingly STUPID!!!!"We have to rely on copies of copies of anonymous authors with no originals and the textural testimony to a miracle for example, there"s no amount of reports, anecdotal reports that is sufficient to justify in believing that actually happened as reported. And anything that would qualify as a god would clearly understand this and if it wanted to clearly convey this to people in a way that is believable would not be relying on ---TEXT--- to do so. And this to me is the nail in the coffin for christianity. The god that christians believe in is amazingly ---STUPID---!!! If it actually wants to achieve its goal by spreading its word to humanity by relying on text, by relying on languages that die off, by relying on anecdotal testimony, that"s not a pathway to truth. And anything that would qualify for a god would know this.which shows either god does not exist or doesn"t care enough about the people to understand the nature of evidence to actually present it. Now which of those two possibilities is accurate?" Matt Dillahunty Bye. Your next post will most certainly be totally and 100% be ignored.