BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
AOW, Turkey vs Israel

It will be a fun one! ##'s: MANPOWER Going beyond military equipment totals and perceived fighting strength is the actual manpower that drives a given military. Wars of attrition favor those with more. Total Population: 7,821,850 Available Manpower: 3,511,190 Fit for Service: 2,963,642 Reaching Military Age Annually: 121,722] Active Frontline Personnel: 160,000 Active Reserve Personnel: 630,000 LAND SYSTEMS Tank value includes Main Battle Tanks, light tanks and tank destroyers, either wheeled or tracked. AFV value includes Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs) and Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs). Tanks: 4,170 Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFVs): 10,185 Self-Propelled Guns (SPGs): 650 Towed-Artillery: 300 Multiple-Launch Rocket Systems (MLRSs): 48 AIR POWER Includes both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft from all branches of service. Total Aircraft: 684 Fighters/Interceptors: 242 Fixed-Wing Attack Aircraft: 242 Transport Aircraft: 101 Trainer Aircraft: 247 Helicopters: 143 Attack Helicopters: 48 NAVAL POWER Aircraft Carrier value includes dedicated "helicopter carrier" vessels. Total naval strength includes all known auxiliaries as well. Total Naval Strength: 66 Aircraft Carriers: 0 Frigates: 0 Destroyers: 0 Corvettes: 3 Submarines: 5 Coastal Defense Craft: 56 Mine Warfare: 0 RESOURCES (PETROLEUM) Despite the advances made in battlefield technology, oil remains the lifeblood of any fighting force as well as local economy. Oil Production: 3,800 bbl/day Oil Consumption: 240,000 bbl/day] Proven Oil Reserves: 11,500,000 bbl/day LOGISTICAL War is as much a battle of logistics - moving man and machine from points all over - as it is direct combat. Labor Force reflects possible wartime industry strength. Labor Force: 3,493,000 Merchant Marine Strength: 8] Major Ports and Terminals: 4 Roadway Coverage: 18,290 Railway Coverage: 975 Serviceable Airports: 47 FINANCIAL (in USD) Regardless of military strength in numbers, war is still driven by financing as much as any one leader or weapon. Defense Budget: $17,000,000,000 External Debt: $96,300,000,000 Reserves of Foreign Exchange and Gold: $80,740,000,000 Purchasing Power Parity: $273,200,000,000 GEOGRAPHY (in km) Geographical values primarily figure into a defensive-minded war (i. e. invasion). Square Land Area: 20,770 km Coastline: 273 km Shared Border: 1,068 km Waterways: 0 km
Why Bernie Sanders should not be president

I hope you get a chance to respond soon. I would like to continue this debate by saying Bernie has also done some socially unmoral things like voting against amber alerts for missing kids back in April of 2003. Bernie also wants to isolate this country and the evidence is all there in his senate votes people. Bernie voted to opt out of the WTO (World Trade Organization) back in June of 2000. I'm trying to be brief so i can make this debate more interesting. Hopefully you'll respond
Why Bernie Sanders should not be president

Bernie Sanders is not at all a reliable candidate for the presidential nominee. College tuition for free may sound like a good concept, but then when you think about it, it is not free due to the fact that taxes will dramatically increase. When tuition is free for the younger generation, it is coming out of pockets of people who have already got their college degree and are already high-income citizens. Now looking at religious wise I believe that Bernie Sanders is the definition of a Hypocrite. Bernie voted NO on the senate floor to protecting the pledge of allegiance in schools (SEP. 2004) as well as voting NO on allowing prayer during school after the horrible attacks of 9/11 (Nov. 2001). Not only did he vote NO to these acts, but BERNIE SANDERS IS JEWISH! Not only that, but he urges China to respect freedom of religion which is hypocrisy due to the fact that he won't allow freedom of religion in public schools. Bernie also states that he wanted to raise minimum wage to $15 which is ludicrous and insane! When you raise the minimum wage by that much, you hurt small businesses and companies will lay off workers which will severely increase the unemployment rate. Not only that, but that opens up the door for inflation. Bernie also insists as you mentioned on Racial Justice, however in Feburary of 2008 Bernie voted NO on allowing tribal indians to opt out of federal healthcare which is considered unconstitutional when you consider that all men are created equal.
Why Bernie Sanders should not be president

Bernie Sanders is receiving huge amount of supporters in recent weeks, however voters seem to not do their research and notice some HUGE cons to voting for Bernie. Whoever picks up this debate will be in for some information they may not know about Bernie and i encourage people to vote on it afterwards. Looking forward to a great debate! (P.S. Im a Ted Cruz fan) I'm practicing for my Young republicans vs Young Democrats debate as i am taking the GOP side. Round 1: Opening Statements Round 2: Rebuttal Round 3: Rebuttal Round 4: Closing statements
Men > Women

1) The reason that men have a higher birthing rate than women is because some countries advocate policies of female infanticide..... This actually occurs in the two largest countries in the world..... http://www.gendercide.org... http://www.webster.edu... http://www.domesticviolenceservices.com... The idea that men are born more than women isnt a genetic thing, its a pre-planned-national-policy-regarding-sex-based-abortion thing.... 2) It doesnt matter if your still alive, stats show that women are better then men at living longer. Part of your opening argument was that "men are better than women in every category" and that includes average lifespan.... 3) I dont know what your arguing regarding pregnancy and the ability to give birth (which women are far better at) but the argument still stands that women are better at giving birth, which again is an argument i can use against your "in every category" statement 4) "what can being female offer over being male?" See points below 5) Eating dinner and reading a book may count as multitasking, but raising 3 or more kids while keeping the house in order while trying to make sure they arent hurting themselves while making sure they do their homework while making sure everyone is fed and well clothed while you sit around eating and reading the whole time kind of gives women the ability to multitask better than men.... 6) All my points are completely relevant because each point is a valid example of something women are better than men at... 7) Apart from you openly declaring yourself a liar (which i already figured out because no teacher makes 150K a year) I can offer evidence that the best debater on this site is a woman http://www.debate.org... 8) As for the statement " what can being female offer over being male?" Women can choose their spouse since we live in a society where women can choose their life partners, men can only hope she says yes Women often get free drinks in bars and nightclubs if they are pretty enough Women dont usually have to pay the bill at dinner, usually the men have to take care of that one Women get to be on the bottom during sex Women get maternity leave (thanks for giving me that info) Women mature faster and thus are smarter at an earlier age than men Women also get to choose who they go to prom with in high school, again guys can only ask and hope she says yes Women dont have to build furniture, that is something that men have to do Women dont have to move heavy things if there is a man available Women get to sleep in since men are usually the ones who have to wake up early and go to work in the mornings Women dont suffer from gambling addictions as much as men do Women dont suffer from alcohol addictions as much as men do Women dont suffer from drug addictions as much as men do Women dont suffer from being addicted to video games, an addiction that effects men far more frequently than women Sidenote: Women are better at voting in elections than men are since female voters vote slightly more often than male voters Ill end here for now.....
Men > Women

•Men have a higher mortality rate than women. Statistically, you're (very slightly) more likely to be born male than female. This is a Good Thing, because women tend to be more sensible than men and therefore don't go around drinking cider, fighting outside the Walkabout in Bromley, or riding motorcycles without insurance. If there wasn't a natural bias to the masculine, then we'd be running out of men too fast. Sure, we could balance this by getting more women to take up dangerous pursuits, but let's face it - the force of tradition is too strong for many to bear. Women are good at drinking White Lightning and screeching, but when it comes to a good old-fashioned pummelling in full view of two disinterested bouncers and a crowd of troglodyte onlookers, nobody does it better than a couple of lagered up blokes. •But I'm not dead yet. That is, despite a genetic predisposition to die faster than women, I'm still here and still typing into this keyboard. Surely that alone is demonstration of something. •Pregnancy holds no fear for me. OK, so I don't get maternity leave, but the cheerful outcome of an EU employment court is that men can have as much paternity leave as they like, as long as they keep putting women up the duff. What's more, they don't have to hang around for any time after the baby pops out, unless they're scared of the moral approbation of those around them. Oh, and Child Support bills, I guess. Hmm. Might have to reconsider that one, although I'm sure a pro forma prenuptial could be proffered every time we go down Tontine Street (Folkestone's own community sperm bank) to impregnate a willing accomplice. Against this, what can being female offer over being male? Living a bit longer? Well, my first point covers that off. I'm not very impressed by turtles either - so they've been hanging around a long time - so what? Being able to multi-task? That cuts no ice either, unfortunately, as I'm well capable of eating my dinner and at the same time reading a book. But never mind. Anyone with better reasons than this should reply beneath. If nobody does, well, I guess it proves who won the gender wars after all... And for all that other BS that you posted, was completely irrelevant. You basically just said things that women are supposed to do. " The top debater is a woman"? you dont know that. I, also clicked that I have an annual income of 150k when editing my account, but i dont.
Men > Women

Im tired of girls telling me, "if you can do it, i can." no. no you cant, im an alpha male and you will never be able to do what a man can. Men have, and always will be better than women in every category. Now, as sexist as this may seem, I am just speaking the truth, and need to get it off my chest. I will give money to the person that can prove to me that women are equal, and or greater than men. LEGGGOO!
The American judicial system is a horrible, greedy corporation.

First of all, let me say that I am proud to be an American, and am thankful to have been born here. Sadly, our great nation has quickly lost all sense of what it once was- a land of freedom, opportunity, and equality. America: Where statistics prove that the judicial system is racially and sexually biased. America: Where we lie, and try to scare the crap out of our kids about issues such as sex and drugs, rather than telling them the truth and teaching them how to be responsible. America: Where the schools can teach politically correct lies, while denying their students constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of speech. America: Where the government profits billions of dollars a year from the sales of alcohol, tobacco, and opiates, but they incarcerate (or otherwise intrude upon a persons civil liberties) 1 out of 5 of our nations youth for possession of drugs or alcohol. America: Where we have campaigns against drunk driving, and bars in every restaurant. Where we often set unreasonably low speed limits, (although we build cars that will go 150-200mph,) and outrageously high fines (Virginia is only the beginning) but that police officer passing by you on the highway is, by definition of the law, "reckless driving", and for no good reason. The list goes on and on, but it all boils down to this: everything about our legal system in America is centered around money. A bunch of self righteous hypocrites with their robes and their badges and guns- these people should not be running things. The fact is, this place is better than alot of other countries, but not much better. Slavery and oppression have simply gone underground, as government sanctioned "penalties" for messing with their profit margin.
Classroom of Elite

Thanks very much for accepting my topic. Very greatfull then. Lets get started, Form on starting of the series horikita suzune "HS" works hard to reach class A. despite she is in class D. She worth to be in class A. (As her only defect is that she was not social with other) But kiotaka Anyanokoji "KA" He is full of defects (Hyper anti social, Hideous personality, Friend with benefits motive, Not over any involvement to motivate reach to class A) And as for HS she any how wants the whole group to be in class A. In one scence she just down his english score to save volleyball player student. (i forgot his name, Pardn me! ) She is the class group leader in camp. She leads the group at bad worst case. And she acts for whole class to reach in class A. Rather for KA he acts only for his self peace Only when, When some one push to do it. He does some work. When kushida (girl) he knows what she hold(a hidden personality) He (KA) prefer to say quite, Rather then giving her a vibe instead. When it comes to his personal asking question he (KA) always tell lie, Which at future is big threaten to reach class A. And one above all his motivation to help the calss Is totally unclear in season1 And His actions r totally manipulation to others If some one discovered this thing about KA, Then the class just break like glass into peices. In fact He (KA) doesn't care for any one He use every one as a tool After getting his purpose complete he just leave the class at the dead end. That's i got for this round. Make ur move Tomato. Counter my points. Be a good contender.
Classroom of Elite

Classroom of EliteHello my contender. My self Debate0ts nice to tell u. I m on the topic of TV series CRE Horikita Suzune vs Kiotaka AnyanokojiSkills (handling situation, Manipulation, Denfending, Attacking, Friends, And etc. . . ) For my contender releif i take the hard sideI m on the side of horikita(girl) My contender must atleast have seen these series to know what i m talking about. On starting plz introduce ur self as that atleast i did. (Might i get a good knowledge opponent)
Abortion

No, the bible did not reward people. Sometimes God let's children die because it's all apart of His plan for us. God told Abraham to build an altar and kill His son. If you read the bible, God sent an angel to stop Abraham before he killed his son Isaac. Abraham never killed his son. God was only testing Abraham's faithfulness. Going back to how abortion is performed, baby parts were sold a few years back, I don't know much about it now, but if you'd like to go back to abortion procedures, there was a woman named Abby Johnson. She wrote a book. She used to be the CEO of planned parenthood and after performing an abortion, she realized what she was doing and converted to Christianity. You should read her book. It's good and shows just what abortion can do to someone. But to finally end, I believe abortion is wrong and should be made illegal. It can hurt people for life and it costs everything you are. Thank you.
Abortion

I only said it was evolution because that is what you made it to be. I know we supposedly came from apes and/or chimps; but you know what I'm saying and monkeys come from the same family anyway. Evolution does not exist. If interested, challenge me to another debate. I know women die from childbirth. So are you saying in the midst of childbirth women should kill their babies? No, whoever dies, dies due to natural issues. Children shouldn't die from their parent's decision to do so. It's also very gruesome how abortions can be performed. My mother witness the baby being sucked out of the womb. My mother told me that she saw; "The baby was struggling to get away, but there was nowhere to go." Babies body parts are sold and it's just evil the way things are done. http://www.justfacts.com... This is a website for the development of a baby. These babies are real, moving, and living lives. To kill them is brutal and cruel.
Abortion

In regards to evolution, a fetus turning into a baby is not evolution. If you are claiming it is evolution, that is the same as a child growing into an elderly person performing "evolution." Also, humans did not evolve from monkeys; they evolved from apes such as chimps. Evolution is evolution because it bars us from creating life with other species, therefore a fetus turning into a baby is not evolution. In regards to a mother dying, many women die from child bearing. This is a informatory website issued by the government: http://www.cdc.gov...
Abortion

Technically speaking, there really is no difference between a fetus and a baby. In saying that, it would take me to evolution. I do not believe in evolution. In saying fetus' aren't babies; is saying they evolve into a baby within the womb. That would be an incorrect statement. If evolving from monkey's to humans took "millions" of years, how come it takes nine months for a fetus to become a child? When it comes to this "infanticide" term; abortion is abortion. Killing isn't a game. In having abortion, you kill your child, you are killing a life. Also, technically speaking; every abortion is always for someone's convenience. If the child was going to come out dead, there is no pain when it comes out or it gets surgically removed. In regards to deformation; my friend is deformed. Believe me; she is not a "blob of flesh" In regards to a mother's only chance of living, give me a scenario. I need proofs of your points.
Abortion

Sorry for the lateness of this debate. Also, there is a difference between fetuses and babies. I understand that this will narrow down to a moral debate, so I would like to address some things. 1) Abortion isn't the killing of children at your convenience, that is called infanticide. 2) What about if the mother's life is in danger? What if her only chance of living is abortion? 3) What if the child will come out deformed or dead? Then the mother is only going through the pain of childbearing to produce a blob of flesh.
Abortion

In my opinion, I am unsure as to when a baby gets certain body parts, nor do I really care. When a woman reads "positive" on her pregnancy test; it means that there is a life inside of her. A life that could either be an average joe, or a world-changer! Being pregnant is a big responsibility. In doing so, women have to carry a big burden of keeping a child alive. Many people believe that with the first few weeks of a baby's life, they technically aren't even "living". Therefore; having abortion wouldn't be wrong because you really aren't killing a human being. The truth is; being pregnant, is basically a home and shelter for a young life that can't take care of itself. Babies have lives too and killing them for your own convenience isn't fair to them or you at all.
John F. Kennedy is still Alive!

"No one has actually publicly seen the body of John F. Kennedy being buried meaning there is no absolute surety that he is died. For anyone knows his casket was full of shamwow towels (even though they were not exist at the time)" Under the terms of your debate, must demonstrate the JFK is alive. This is not the same as a conjecture about how he may not have really died some 40 years ago.
John F. Kennedy is still Alive!

"There is no proof the person killed wasn't a decoy." You also offer no proof that the person killed was a decoy and not Kennedy himself. There is no proof that he wasn't cloned by aliens and taken to their mother world for observation while one of his clones took the bullet either, but this hardly makes that claim true. So I appreciate the fact that you came up with a conjecture about the assassination attempt, but you have failed to support your original statement that JFK is still alive. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate that JFK is still alive so I will offer you another chance to provide such evidence. Please also extend your evidence past the assassination attempt to today, since you claim that he is "still alive". After all, JFK would now be 92 which is well past the average life expectancy.
Resolved: The United States should end Plan Colombia

What does homicides have to do with the decrease of drug trafficking the number of homicides don't have anything to do with drug making or trafficking. We gave Colombia 10 billion dollars to get their crap together and to help them get a more stable government. The U.S has stepped up their security on the borders but Colombia is actually doing the opposite. We gave them 10 billion dollars and their hasn't been any benefits to the U.S. Colombia has failed to stop smuggling. Curtailment of the flow of cheap cocaine into the country was a major policy of the United States. Even in the earliest years of the program it was clear Plan Colombia was failing to meet its objectives despite significant financial commitment. Colombia has failed to have peace. This past October Colombian voters reject the much praised peace accord between the Colombian government and FARC. However, it seems that voters were not ready to accept a deal which would cover decades of atrocities and human rights abuses with a deal granting amnesty in exchange for confessions. In this deal, perhaps the "cost" of peace was too high.
religion, god or not, and why cant we all be treated equally

But why do the extreme people belive in the bible. The bible is a book that has been reproduce alot andits easy to make changes to a book. Example if the factory that made the bible had someone break in and change something and printed thousands of bibles, and the book is writen by mankind, even hitler made a book that changed peoples views, and sciancetolgy (i know its spelled wrong) was formed was the same way but someone betted him that he could do it so he made a book. Like what some people say dont believe everything you read on the internet. There should be a way to teach everyone to have respect, i know it wont work tho. Also if a book is the only thing they can get for proff thats just sad. Didnt god say treat thy self as you treat thy neighbor, So the people that dont like the gays and make fun of them are breaking a command ment then that means that they will go to hell. Wouldnt?
religion, god or not, and why cant we all be treated equally

The thing is the views impacts on society. One example i will bring up is gay marriage. This has been a big impact on society right now. Extreme people that believe in the bible are against marriage equality which makes it even harder for people to accept on another. The problem isn't in the moderates, the problem lies within the extremes. The problem is in the 2 extreme differences between the groups. And as we have seen in history once we have conflicting viewpoints people will argue and debate. And really without different views, we would not have any disagreements and not have debate .org! As you brought up putting 2 together is possible and have been done before, but with advancing science an technology the two groups are growing farther and farther apart with views. I'm trying not to sway one way to stay on the topic of the debate.