Abortion Is A Humane Mesaure

https://www.youtube.com...... I advise the voters to watch this video before voting. Pro by default had the BOP, which I do not believe he fulfilled, and here is a summary of my points, compiled from earlier rounds- R1- Yes, every abortion kills an innocent human being. Even more alarming is the fact that beginning at the 8th week of development, an unborn baby that is aborted feels pain during the abortion. The baby feels both psychological and real physical, organic pain. Let that sink in. Of course, whether or not abortion is a painful experience to the unborn child being aborted, the child is left no less dead as a result. In talking about the question of fetal pain, we must remember that it ultimately has no bearing on the morality of abortion. Abortion kills babies. Wait, it actually gets worse. Abortion painfully kills babies." There was a case of a baby who, while aborted, was clinging to the womb(http://www.lifenews.com......) 1- Abortion causes pain 2- Abortion is murder 3- The fetus can feel pain (of course, the word "fetus" is an attempt to dehumanize the baby through wording) 4-Abortion is unconstitutional. R2- Most abortions are because the mother had sex and didn't want a baby. Not because of rape or incest or health. And anyway, it isn't the baby's fault.(http://www.johnstonsarchive.net......) A baby did not choose to be resulted from rape (my argument) Minor premise The baby is innocent of the crime (punish the guilty, not the innocent) Major premise A baby is not to be aborted (conclusion,my argument) A parent has responsibility to give birth to you/raise you. That is their entire job. It doesn't matter how good or how bad your life is, it is up to you to make something of yourself. Them aborting you denies you basic constitutional rights. The following is an excerpt from http://indefenseoftheconstitution.blogspot.com...... - R3- "The Court in Roe struck down states’ ability to prohibit abortions, holding that up to a certain point in term a woman’s “right of privacy” encapsulates the right to terminate her pregnancy while outweighing a state’s interest in preventing abortion. However, the Court drew this ruling from an overly broad interpretation of the “liberty” guarantee of the Due Process Clause. The “right of privacy” is not and cannot be guaranteed at all cost. No reasonable person would hold that something such as murder would be protected if done within the privacy of one’s own home. There are limits on what can be done by one even within the realm of privacy. Roe had no basis in the actual text of the Constitution itself. The ruling overlooked the textual guarantee of “life” which precedes “liberty” in the 14th Amendment. Moreover, it did so in preference for a “constitutional right” found nowhere within the text of the Constitution. If a ruling of the Court will have the effect of infringing upon a right guaranteed by the Constitution, the ruling cannot stand. In the case of Roe,the Court made such a ruling. This non-textual exercise of judicial activism cannot be perpetuated by this Court. " It was unconstitutional then and the same holds today. The rights our forefathers and the author of the Declaration of Independance wrote this dow The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid w http://www.ushistory.org....... I sadly had to remove a large portion of the Declaration due to lack of room,However the emboldened text tells us that abortion is against the Declaration. That concludes this summary, I enjoyed this debate, good luck to my opponent. I deleberately kept the misspellings so as not to edit my arguments.