BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Assassinate Kim Jong Un

Try him in absentia first. Due process is a right even for the very worst. I don't support the death penalty at all, nor torture, but life no parole in a high security military prison. Dtudy his twisted mind and learn how to intervene early to prevent the evolution of a dictator. I feel he is worth more to the intelligence community medicated, alive, and not tortured. All assasinations violate due process. God loves all humans, and all have sinned, including Mr. Un.
Assassinate Kim Jong Un

The assassination of Kim Jong Un could be done swiftly and thoroughly and could free the oppressed north koreans. The problem is that the US just doesn't want to get involved with anything at all and doesn't want to take such actions. But the action should be taken because if we don't do this it's North Korea will continue to build up its new nuclear arsenal until we have a even worse situation on our hands. We'l have to do it eventually and it's the right thing to do to save the north korean people from starvation and oppression.
Anyone with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in the preschool.

Thank you Raisor for not forfeiting this debate. I, kingcoolbeans, refuse to sacrifice my dignity to someone who asks their girlfriend to marry them on Facebook, urinated in their pants during nap time and smeared glue all over their face. All of this extra information you gave me can only be used against you. Raisor, can you please do a word search in your first speech? You clearly did not say you had a Crayola crayon set, so therefore you cannot accuse me of accusing you of lying. I am sorry, Caryola has only been around for 100 years, so therefore it did not exist in medievil times. If 5-year-olds are so dumb that they cannot even appreciate all of the colours in a 64 crayon set, the how could preschool social dynamics possibly be complex? Your sources prove nothing. This is a matter of logic, not facts. No one can prove that preschool social dynamics are complex. The only ones that can prove this is the preschoolers, and apparently they are to dumb to even appreciate 64 colours. Your arguments are simply going around in circles, each one counteracting the other to prove MY point, that anyone with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in the preschool. Although my definition states anyone, I didn't think I would be versing someone who had rather serious childhood issues. I am sorry. I'll change it to anyone not like Raisor with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in preschool. But this is more than just buying popularity, it is adding to the classroom. Steve Jobs added something to the world by creating apple. This changed how people ran their lives. Like a 64 crayon set, it is changing how the kids draw their pictures. Like Steve jobs added something to the world, a 64 crayon set is adding something to the classroom. Thank you Raisor for accepting my challenge. This has been a very intriguing debate. But I know that my theory about 5-year-old politics is true. There is simply no way you can prove it.
Anyone with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in the preschool.

When I went to preschool is irrelevant to this Resolution. A 64 crayon box was even more rare when I was in preschool than it is now; if anything the social value of these crayons should have been higher when I was still learning the difference between red and blue. The fact is, preschool children are simply too dumb to appreciate the breadth of color available to them in a 64 crayon box. This study shows the young children tend focus heavily on single objects and lack the ability to develop a breadth of focus when interacting with toys. To toddlers, a 64 box of crayons is simply a box of whichever crayon they see first. Most preschoolers simply are not developed enough to fully appreciate the rainbow of colors in a 64 crayon box. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... Pro is simply wrong when he states Preschool social dynamics are not complex. The paper below shows how gender and peer pressure, individual behavior and personalities play a strong role in the socialization of preschool children. Thus my own experience as a preschooler is supported by the top of the line academic research on the scurrying patterns of rugrats. While I tried to buy popularity with crayola crayons, the depravity of my personality repelled the other children. Because my individual behavior included smearing glue on my face and urinating in my pants at nap-time, I was treated as a freak and stupid-head by my classmates. And rightly so! http://130.15.96.140/SSG/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Martin_et_al_2005.pdf Finally, I ask the judges to vote Conduct against my opponent for his callous slander in suggesting I would ever lie about the brand of crayons I owned. When I say I owned a 64 box of Crayola crayons, that is my word. I demand Pro apologize for his outrageous accusations by saying "I am a butthead and Raisor is the coolest, Raisor is way better than me because I'm a stupid liar."
Anyone with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in the preschool.

Thank you for accepting my challenge Raisor. I am sorry it had to come to this, I really didn't want to have to publicly humiliate anyone with my swagalicious debating sklz. I'm sorry about your excruciating childhood. It is unfortunate that my theory about 5-year-old politics didn't work for you. If you need some help you may want to see a psychologist.But, I know my theory... Is more than just a theory. It accurately describes life for first-world, 21st century preschoolers. Judging by your profile picture, you must have gone to medievil preschool. I m sorry, but your arguments are out of date.As for asking your preschool crush to marry you on Facebook, you clearly had the Faber Castell crayon set, not the Crayola.Preschool social dynamics are not very complex at all. It is simply little tackers trying to find their way in the world, dominated by adults forcing them to do activities that most of them don't want to do. These youngsters can only dream within the bubble that the adult dominated society puts them in. Therefore, a 64 crayon set is as far as the 5-year-old mind can see. The adult dominated society is simply trying to avoid anarchy, this is something they learnt somewhere between your time, and my time.CEO of Crayola, Mike Perry, said at Crayola's Birthday party, "We at Crayola have been privileged to spawn a century of creativity in children. We celebrate their accomplishments and commit ourselves to continuing our mission for another 100 years"and beyond. Thank you to all who celebrate with us today."This destroys your arguments completely. Your face just imploded. The fact that I actually found a quote from the CEO of CRAYOLA!!! Wow!!! I am sorry, but you have nothing to say (except to a psychologist). Thanks for trying.Now a word from our sponsors: "Did you see Jimmy hit that ball like a full pelt!" fullpelt.weebly.com
Anyone with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in the preschool.

I can easily negate this Resolution by offering the following fact to the judges: I had a 64 crayon but was a huge loser in preschool. One time in preschool i dressed up as the White Power Ranger for Halloween because Tommy was the coolest. Another kid in my class showed up as the Green Ranger which, as we all know, was Tommy's original Power Ranger incarnation when he was under Rita Repulsa's evil spell. Now obviously there couldn't be TWO Tommy's for Halloween, so i told this power to back the fudge off. But all the Green Ranger's friends surrounded me and told me I was the fake Tommy and no one liked me. I knew they were right so I started crying and hid in the bathroom. My 64 crayon set also did nothing to help my popularity with the ladies. Vividly do i remember standing in line for the bathroom behind my preschool crush and loudly exclaiming "we're going to get married when we grow up!" Alas, not only did she immediately tell everyone I was gross and she did not like me, but she has sustained this repulsion through adulthood, as she has repeatedly refused my attempts to set up a wedding date. I mean, I understand proposing over facebook isn't optimal, but I don't have many options when she won't return my phone calls and involves third parties every time I show up at her house. I have way more than 64 crayons now too, but she really doesnt seem interested in any crayon I offer her. In summary, preschool social dynamics involve a number of complex factors that far exceed the scope of a 64 crayon box. I know from personal experience that if you constantly try to hug all your classmates with your snot covered hands, you will be rejected by preschool society no matter how many crayons you have.
Anyone with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in the preschool.

Every preschool has that special child with the 64 crayon set. Every drawing time, this child would be swarmed by his/her peers for that one-of-a-kind olive-green crayon. I strongly believe, with every fibre of my being, that anyone with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in the preschool. I debate on behalf of all of the millions of preschoolers all around the world who desire to be that special child. I hereby challenge anyone who thinks they are swagalicious enough to take on the likes of kingcoolbeans and preschoolers all around the world
Anyone with the 64 crayon set is automatically the most popular kid in the preschool.

coolbeans has missed the entire thrust of my argument, I wish he would pay closer attention. I did not ask my girlfriend to marry me on facebook! As I have tried to make painfully clear, my preschool paramour left my affections unrequited- she was not and has never been my girfriend, despite the dumptruck of crayons I leave on her lawn every Memorial Day. I am incredibly distressed by my opponent's cruel words. I bared my soul to the world, displayed the deep psychological wounds inflicted on me by the Machiavellian world of preschool social dynamics. Coolbeans has only used this to further demean me and add to my crippling social anxiety. To respond to my opponent's argument- social dynamics are not dependent on the ability to appreciate a wide range of objects. Ants have complex social dynamics, as do bonobos and rats. Yet we would not expect bonobos to luxuriate in the cool depths of Navy Blue, to feel the burning passion inspired by Orange Red, or to know that Sepia is worthless and has no possible use. Young children cannot focus on more than one object at a time, yet still they manage to achieve a level of social complexity on par with rats. Incredible! Con has, in fact, conceded this debate. He has conceded that a 64 box of Crayola crayons was insufficient to overcome the myriad of social deficiencies I exemplified in the earliest hours of my youth. Thus he concedes that the Resolution is false- said box of crayons is insufficient to make "anyone" automatically the most popular kid in preschool. In conclusion, I leave this video of a preschool kid trying to kick a ball:
America should divide it's policy to fit with the ideals of individual Counties

After watching the recent election, this idea for a new political system has come to mind. I want to throw it into the open and see if it can be picked apart as an inefficient system. So as I was watching, I see the large state maps that are divided into counties, each of which are colored red or blue. I thought, "What if we employed conservative ideals in the red counties and liberal ideals in the blue counties?" Of course, there would be limitations, but say the people of a county go to a annual poll to determine what the restrictions and laws will be. This was, in the mostly liberal urban areas, there can be restriction on guns, as it is in popular opinion, while the rural conservative areas can keep their guns in their counties. The way I see it, there is no way for both parties to be happy at the same time using our current system with these very yes/no issues, like abortion, gun control, gay marriage, and the likes. Other than the nightmare of implementing this system, what would be some of the negatives that drag the idea down?
reagan was a bad president

My opponent keeps on repeating herself. National debt is bad. It would collapse the economy. However she still misses my point. Even if the interest gets larger and larger, we don't have to pay it, for the reasons I gave in the first round. Next, in this whole debate she never warrants why increasing the national debt makes a president bad. She is saying that any president with high national debt was bad. Like Lincoln and FDR. She says we should criticize them for it, but she doesn't say they were bad. So essentially, her main argument doesn't make a president bad. You can drop her whole case. It is non-unique. She then goes on to say that he didn't really help it. Extend all the reasons I gave why Reagan's economic plan helped. She then argues that my syllogism is faulty. My syllogism explains how indirectly Reagan was responsible. I say however, she has not proved that he didn't. My opponent's whole round has been circular arguments. Voting Issues: 1) She has yet to explain how a national debt makes a president bad. Since she has not she has not affirmed the resolution on a topical basis. 2) Extend my whole point about Reaganomics and how they helped the economy. 3) She has not disproved that Reagan did not help to end the Cold War. For these reason I urge a negation.
reagan was a bad president

I negate: Reagan was a bad president I will attack my opponents case then move to present my own. Ok, my opponent's whole case is that Reagan caused the national debt that we are in today. My Response: This argument doesn't affirm the resolution what so ever. Reasons: A) Debt in today's political society means nothing. The majority of the debt we are in is because of China. However, China cannot do anything about it. They will not call the debt in (i.e. force us to pay) because if they do the following would happen: 1. Their own economy would collapse because they rely on our market more then any other market in the world. If they call in the debt then they would lose the US market which in-turn would destroy the Chinese Market. 2. Debt can only be "forced" with a backing of hard force, i.e. military action. The Chinese military wouldn't even be close to winning a war against us. They have absolutely no military prowess since they focused all their money onto building a trading empire. Also, they wouldn't go to war for reason 1 above. (They would lose their major market) B) The Debt that's caused doesn't define what a bad and good president is. The national debt was extremely high during Lincoln's era. And he is one of the most beloved US presidents. Most would say he was a good president. Moving to my own case: Contention I: President Reagan's economic policies stimulated the economy. A) Created 17 million new jobs. One-fourth of the new jobs were created in 68 consecutive months. Black unemployment was cut in half. B) We were given incentives to save our money, to work, and to invest because of Reagan's tax reforms. Investing in the market tripled in his presidency. C) The inflation rate decreased to less than 4.4%. Family income rose 12%. D) Established the longest peacetime prosperity in the nation's history. Contention II: End of the Cold War A direct reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War was the economic suffering felt by the USSR and its people because their government overspent on developing new technology to keep up with the US and the strengthened free market under Reagan. Reagan's economic policies were a reason that the scariest time in American History was ended. --> Link as rebuttal to opponent: My opponent says this is bad because it created more of a debt. I doubt the people at the time cared about the debt when there was a threat of a nuclear attack. For these reasons I negate. Thank you ladies and gentlemen.
reagan was a bad president

so i'm questioning the conventional wisdom that regean was such a great president. the national debt went up substantially, starting with him, exponentially. now, we have the debt going up two million dollars a minute, and the everyone paying a fifth of their taxes to interest only, nothing really, and the average person is born with 30k in debt. he wanted to spend less, but whatever the case, his tax cuts costed us this, given that spending less wasn't going to happen. it's a fundamental management aspect, that oftne gets lost in politics, that what you go in debt for, you're going to have to pay back later with interst. unless he was justified to go into debt like that. there's the fact that the interests rates were so high, in the eighties, and the cold war. is it realy true, that we can attribute the cold war to regan outspending them? people debate it. and on its face, it seems like it could be simply a caracature not based on much to rationalize the debt. that's a pretty profound claim. the presumptio should be against it, givne that it's so unprobable, albeit plausible? couldn't they have given targeted tax cuts, or wouldn't the economy have taken care of itself? was it really needed for us to go so far into debt? it seems like the economy would have taken care of itself. so, shouldn't the presumptio be aginst his tax cuts being needed so all in all,,, these are all ratianliations to get around his fiscal irresponsibility? tax cuts can only do so much, right? i mean really, as a matter of good judgment beyond rhetoric? so maybe he's only good, more for what he stood for than for what he did... and maybe a lot has to do with just imagery, a simple man with common sense taht somehow escapes eeryone else..... and despite what he did that was actually bad? natial debt history http://zfacts.com... (plus, on abortion... he appoited some prolife judges, but he also appoited some prochoice too, just as many (he was friends with sadam hussein if you remeber rumsfeld meeting with him back then etc, and gave osama his start with weopons)
EA SPORTS should make a NCAA WRESTLING VIDEO GAME.

I assume this round is for an actual argument, seeing as there are only two. I disagree that they should make a NCAA wrestling game, on the grounds that to be a successful game, it needs a group of people who would buy that game. It is simple supply and demand. Without a demand, why supply? Now, I know you argued that this could possibly be "the best selling game in the world..." but I disagree. The best selling game of all time so far is Pokï¿½mon Red, Blue and Green (Gameboy), which sold 20.08 million copies worldwide. The closest thing to a sports game on the list is Gran Turismo, and it's pretty far down. So, I have serious doubts about people "dieing to see game like this made"
EA SPORTS should make a NCAA WRESTLING VIDEO GAME.

Like every other college sports wrestling is very popular as an individual sports and a team sports. People are dieing to see game like this made. Not even in the United States alone, people all around the world llove ncaa wrestling. This may just be the best selling game in the world. Take for example peo;ple will love to play with Anthony Robles or compete aganist them. For you readers out there who don't know who Anthony Robles is, he is a Ncaa wrestle who has one legs but with his motivation from his mom he was able to win aganist a very good wrestle. I mean these are story like this people will love to see added in a video game story mode.
Minecraft sucks

Con says that minecraft lags in an outdated pc. Actually my game does not lag but only mannually like when blowing up TNT http://www.youtube.com...? This is one of the rebuttals i have prepared for. But when it comes to multiplayer its both the company's and computers fault. Servers(multiplayer areas) only says they have one server, which is the reason why im lagging in mineplex . More servers(a place where to store information), less lag. Also i had the mobile PE version and is worst than ever. microsoft is rather stingy and they update something which is from the pc version to the pe version in 6 months+ which is too long( expected to be a month). The xbox version also had proved that mojang totally forgotten to put a tutorial in the pc editition. And even after a the xbox version had been realeased (which had a tutorial). There is still no update giving a tutorial on pc! Yes i agree minecraft is about building, so thats why they should remove survival mode, which will soon become " survival creative" in the meantime so mostly youtubers like stampylonghead builds creations in "survival mode". Having constant updates could be planned from the start so minecraft would be fresh. There are people who care...they actually care less then others, they are sly and uses tricks like : Save money by making bad graphics which would make the game badly unique ,the update situation stated above and not to spend much money on the game as its already popular and pampered by the community who are giving them maps and mods etc. which could also contain a virus which you may not notice. There are people who like it is not an appropriate support since this younger kids do not understand what a good game is. A good game is farcry 4, which is highly underrated. Mature games are actually better because it gives the company freedom to do plenty in their games. Sadly more kids play the not rated side of the game as their parents might be promoting it. Addiction is good? Again one of the rebuttals i have prepared. Addiction is actually BAD. I wonder whether con even knows what addiction is...minecraft is addictive because there are so much things to do so the player cant stop This are signs of being addicted to minecraft: Heavy begging to play Tantrums when stopped Always talking, thinking and doing minecraft And this are the consequences: Less sleep Affect on studies since can be distracted by minecraft(like writing a book of minecraft in study when parents arent home?) Getting fever thanks to playing too much The worst is when you play too much, you can die by exhaustion. For the toys, they are more of display. I saw a skydoesminecraft fan toy(he is an inappropriate youtuber) for $34, that fan toy is small and have small butter objects. Another is captainsparklez slime sword which is $24 is bascially plastic that is too dangerous to be used for fun. When you say they worked like they are supposed to, its false. A steve and a crafting table toy that i recieved(ugh) cant even craft. Or that slime sword is plastic, and that toy creeper cant even split open.
Minecraft sucks

Minecraft only lags in a outdated PC. For my it works smoothly and you can play it on your mobile and consoles so there's that too. Minecraft is about building so if you don't like the combat system than go to the creative mode. Minecraft at least gets constant updates which means 1. There are people who care which means there are people who like it and 2. The Microsoft cares which means it is not a bad game. Minecraft is addicting therefore it is good. The game is different from the toys and they work like supposed too do they aren't scams.
Minecraft sucks

i have been saving some things in the future. Anyway... Minecraft is laggy Minecraft has horrible graphics Minecraft has bad combat. Minecraft is using the wrong kind of music as it does not match the atmosphere. Minecraft is an unfinished product because updates on bug fixes are too common. Which also may show microsoft had planned this. Minecraft is addictive(thats why it also should not be used at school. Minecraft merchandise are actually scams. You dont need handbooks and just can use the internet And so minecraft is a below average game.