Libertarians are right on crime- No victimless crimes and support gun control

Ok. I respond to ALL of his points below but I'd like you to seee my offense first. First of all, he didnt even begin to talk about gun control. In Florida, the gun ban was dropped and crime lowered 20%. In D. C. , gun bans were enstated and crime rose dramatically. Criminals are afraid of armed suspects. You cant get rid of all the guns. If you try, all you do is make it so that citizens have noprotection and criminals can prey on them. Why hasnt he touched on this? My opponent gives a lot of example of victimless crimes that are not even victimless crimes. An example is drug usage and gambling. Our prisons are very crowded with drug users and dealers. If we got rid of some of those people, then there would be, obviously, significantly less crowded prisons. This means violent criminals serve their full terms and criminals are discouraged because the parole system wont bail them out. We spend trillions on the War on Drugs (drugsense. org). We can cut this cost and put it toward education or veteran's health or something instead of fighting drugs, ineffectively. And obviously drugs can be taxed. This will be significant revenue. In Amsterdam, soft drugs are legal. Their homicide rate is way down. They spend way less on crime by some 150 Euros. And their drug usage is halved. (. http://www.drugwarfacts.org...) - Drinking and driving + Drinking and driving is not a victimless crime. Familes of lost loved ones and the innocent drivers that are not drinking are the victims. Drinking and driving is not a victimless crime. I'm not sure why you thought it is. - Tax evasion + Tax evasion is not a victimless crime. the government looses money and taxes. I don't thinkyuo understand the concept of a "victimless crime. " It is a crime where only the criminal is hurt. - Driving without a licence, and driving without insurance + How do either of these cost lives? Really? The people who are paying the thousands of dollars are paying because they chose to. They have the right to. But anyway driving without a license is not a victimless crime. It hurts drivers on the road if the rdiver is for whatever reason imcompetent. But I defend that driving without insurance is an unreasonable victimless crime. - Child porno + This is horrible. The victims are children who cant make the decision and are not allowed to make decisions until they are 18. And their parents cant make these decisions for them. People under the age of 18 dont count. - Illegal prostitution spreads disease + People who patronize prostitutes under the disease risk and it is conesntual sex. Under any consentual sex you are at a risk for disease. If you sleep with a promiscous person, you are more likely to get a disease. Should it be illegal to be promiscuous? No. - honestly, victimless crime is just as bad. + Are you telling me that smoking a joint is just as bad as killing or raping someone? Any voter can tell you are mistaken. - you fail to mention how many lives are saved from the violent crimes correlated with drugs, prostitution, and gambling. + very few. there ive done it. Thank you. Ive responded to all of his votes incredibly well, without question. And my points have barely been contested. Some not even touched.