Tennis is more difficult then Baseball

Thanks to Pro and his arguments and rebuttals. While Pro's structure of rebuttals and arguments appears a bit disorganized, I will do my best to follow. --------------------------------------------------RE-RE-REBUTTALS (PRO'S ARGUMENTS)Argument 1:There is no "net" in front of pitchers, so angles cannot be compared between the two sports, since there are no angles that pitchers must account for in baseball. The two sports do share the similar aspect of surface areas needed to be aimed for. The surface area of the "batter's range" is much smaller than half of a tennis court. There are no "faults" in baseball, so again, I do not see any comparisons that can be made. Argument 2:Baseball bat vs. racketBaseball batters must bat a certain way, too. If there is a runner on first, they must strike early as to send the ball to the left of the field, because sending it to the center or right would more likely result in an out for the runner on first or for the batter. Batters also only have seconds to respond to pitches. Batters do not know if the pitch will be a curveball, fastblall, changeup, etc. They must make a quick decision as to when and how they strike the ball, just like a tennis player. Tennis players strike the ball more than baseball players, and fatigue "Tennis players can sprint more then that in a single rally, never mind a whole match."An amount of sprinting is different from the distance of sprinting. I said that baseball players must run at full speed from 90 ft to 360 ft, so I'm not sure where "tennis players can sprint more" came from. I said that baseball players sprint for longer distances at full speed, and that argument still stands.Argument 3:Fitness"Fitness is a major factor in every sport." Fitness is not a major factor in bowling. "The fitness needed reflects the difficulty of the sport."Bowling requires almost zero fitness. That does not make bowling easy. I'll use a simple syllogism to prove that what you said is false. For anyone who does not know, 'P' means premise, and 'C' means conclusion.P1) The fitness needed reflects the difficulty of the sport.P2) Bowling does not require fitness.C1) Bowling is not difficult. That is completely false. This also answers the Rundown on respective atheletes re-rebuttal. --------------------------------------------------RE-REBUTTALS (MY ARGUMENTS)You said re-rebuttals, but it's just rebuttals (to my argument). Argument 1:I did not say that different game mechanics means that sports are completely incomparable, just incomparable regarding difficulty. --------------------------------------------------REBUTTALS (PRO'S NEW ARGUMENTS)Argument 1:You ignored mental exertion in your "effort" argument and only used physical exertion. With your argument that tennis has more physical exertion, "effort," then you may as well say that bowling is effortless, since bowlers do not go through much physical exertion. I'll use a syllogism once again, in response to your argument: P1) Tennis is difficultP2) Something difficult requires effortP3) Effort requires physical exertionP4) Tennis requires more physical exertion than baseballC1) Tennis is more difficult than baseballThis syllogism is invalid, starting at P3 because physical exertion is only one aspect of "effort." Ah, so you've brought up the skill aspect. I can see where you are trying to go with this argument, but again, different game mechanics makes this argument impossible. Baseball players don't need all of the skills that tennis requires, and tennis players don't need all of the skills that baseball requires. Baseball players need all of their skills too if they want to be competitive, just like tennis players need their respective skills. Baseball players bring 100% of theirs skills all of the time too. I do not see how any of what you said can prove tennis to be more difficult than baseball. Argument 2:Solo sports and team sports fall into two different categories, so they cannot be compared by those aspects. It would be like comparing a bowler to a soccer player. Yes, baseball players do feel mental fatigue too. Batters struggle to determine what the next pitch will be. Batters can be confused by things like the patterns and order of different pitches thrown at them, which can be mentally fatiguing. Argument 3:As I have shown earlier, yes, certain aspects of sports can be compared, but not difficulty as a whole. Not all sports require outstanding physical needs. --------------------------------------------------Thanks again and I look forward to your rebuttals!