Evil and Suffering fails

The evil/suffering argument is not used by believers to prove the existence of God. The evil/suffering argument is usually used by atheists to prove that God does not exist. In this argument I do not need to prove that God exist, only that this particular argument is insufficient to disprove God"s existence. I want to also mention one other point here regarding suffering in particular. In order for suffering to be a valid reason to try and theorize that God cannot exist because of its presence, it must be proven that suffering is ALWAYS a bad thing. This is because atheists maintain a good or loving God would not want His creation to suffer. However, it is quite obvious that all suffering is not a bad thing. There is much suffering involved during childbirth but when the baby is born any loving parent will view the child as the greatest gift and joy possible to experience. The mother willingly endures the suffering. Should God make all women barren so that they do not have to endure the suffering? If He does, then would He not be a bad God instead of loving God? Taking away the suffering but also denying parents everywhere children? This is essentially an area the atheists usually avoid. How exactly is God to stop suffering? If God knows you will die today, must he take away your choice to get out of bed in the morning? Should God make you ill or forcibly prevent you from getting out of the house? Will this not make Him a type of Dictator instead of a loving God? The atheist alternative is not very logical reasoning from the premise that "if a loving God exists". I have heard many stories of people whose lives have been changed when they experienced suffering. Men who abused their children and spouses had a life changing experience when suffering was present that resulted in the man treating this family with the love and respect their families deserve instead of contempt. All suffering is not bad and it is therefore unreasonable to expect a good or loving God to deny the suffering and therefore prevent the good that could come about because of it. As a parent, how many times did you decide to leave your children to go in the direction they wanted to go so that they can learn a lesson because they did not want to heed your warnings or advise that there will be consequences to the path they are taking? How many times have you experienced suffering because you did not want to listen to a loving parent, friend or spouse? Either why way, you learned something. You either learned how to repeat your mistake or how to avoid it. This subject touches on a comment that was made and I hope you won"t mind if I quickly address it. I spoke about a loving or good God. Some arguments refer to an ALL loving God. In the Christian religion and many others, God is never viewed or even called ALL loving. Reasoning against these religions trying to impose upon them a concept of an ALL loving God not claimed by them is unreasonable. I am also against an ALL Loving God. It is a logical contradiction. In order for God to establish order and sustain His creation He must be righteous. In fact, because He loves his creation He must of necessity be righteous. Love and righteousness goes hand in hand. Righteous in part means that order is upheld and those who go against this must be held accountable for the good of everyone else. This accountability may lead to various forms of suffering. When you teach your children, do you not reward them for the good and bad they do, or do you punish them for the bad they do? Why do you do this? Is it because you hate them? Of course not, you do it because you love them and want to teach them what is good and bad for them to avoid problems when they are older. If God is all loving then anyone can do whatever they want without any repercussions. For example: If someone raped your daughter and when caught commits suicide, how can we say justice was served? If the rapist goes to heaven, should God allow him in because He is ALL loving? Anyone with a hint of morality will say no, God should hold him accountable and not let him get away with it. Why? Because it is expected of God to be righteous and reward that person according to his works.