pedophilia

Your personal beliefs does not represent the rest of the world. So don't drag the world into a connection with your personal beliefs. Age of consent is not a requirement but a choice made by conservatives to be followed. In that sense, the conservative world is different from the rest of the world. Because your beliefs are only valid within the conservative community. Your studies are based within the realms of the conservative world but that means nothing to people outside your community. Age does not exist and have everything to do with this debate seeing how you brought up "children" and "kids" in your response. Also a conservative "fantasy" is the rest of the worlds reality and vice versa. So naturally, you would think the way you do. Laws does not control the human element. The people thinks for themselves. The law is a basic outline of the ideology of the current and/or past government in question. But it is not a boundary or a restriction (although some people treat it as such) and it is not a tool to promote or enforced a dictatorship. Also laws constantly are changed and updated. Laws are not written in stone and are open to interpretation. The conservative interpretation of law is different from the open minded community. So law has nothing to do with this debate. In fact it would be more of a trap to include law in this debate in order to force someone into submission of a conservative agenda. To hide behind the law in order to control the situation in their favour instead of allowing things to progress in a natural pace. To turn this debate towards the law, is admitting that you can't think for yourself. Relying on conservative doctrine to fight against a liberal society is not allowing your side to be properly represented because your words becomes moot and lost in translation (conservative language to open minded language). The fact that you continue to use the same argument that is based on "age" and discriminatory tiles based on age, shows that you lack a open mind and came here with a hidden agenda in order to convert the open minded to a conservative slave with an imitated form of free will and free thinking. Look at the people who lose their jobs and their lives because of the madness of the government in result of the "sexual predators listing". Who does that benefit? Nobody. Because the people who are suppressed and oppressed does not receive the same justice as everyone else. This is a form of censorship. We the people are being punished by the government via laws because we live our lives and do things that are different from the understanding and beliefs of the government. This closed minded avenue of governance is bringing us to our doom because it promotes that the government can control us but we as people have no control over ourselves. To divide the people with titles like "paedophiles", therefore leads to the division of society. Just like when the term "faggot" is used in relevance to the LGBTPQ community, it shows the prevalent lack of tolerance and respect towards each other. Or when the term "terrorist" is attached to Muslims and people from the middle east, that shows the existence of a divided establishment. Or when "illegal immigrants" is attached to people who come into America in a non conservative way, it shows that there is no respect to the people who have come to America to live better lives and/or to provide a service to those they love. When the word "nigger" was attached to people with darker skin (not "white") this shows the relevance of racism and bigotry in our society. To call people names and to label and judge them rather personally or through the law is the division of humanity. Where the "faggot" or the "illegal immigrant" is treated far worse than the conservative/Christian who gave them those names in the first place. Where will it end? The segregation of the people by the closed minded person. Total madness. We the people deserve better as living things on this earth. That means all people. So what is a "kid"? You are making no sense. There is nothing selfish about sex or having personal views that are different from someone else. Yes we are capable of making decisions that only promote the well being of everyone. So long as it does not violate the personal beliefs of the other person in question or degrade that person and their way of life. Equality and respect for others benefits everybody and nobody should be left behind. You are dividing humanity into "people I like" vs "people I don't like." Then you base your feelings towards someone on that standard. But that standard is alienating everyone and in return harms the human race. "We" means people. Not "children". The madness in society can be seen by the many victims of society who have experienced this madness first hand. The people who march in the streets for change or the people who speak out in the media and the many art forms. This is the visual proof of the existence of this insanity and madness in society. This is for real and no amount of censorship or closed mindedness will change this truth. Homosexuals are people. Human beings. Not "adults" or kids". There are people who are gay. Nothing wrong with that. But they are people nevertheless and deserve the equal respect that all human beings deserPOST/debates/debate/argument/save/HTTP/1.1Host:www.debate.orgUser-Agent:Mozilla/5.0(WindowsNT10.0;WOW64;rv:55.0)Gecko/20100101Firefox/55.0Accept:*/*Accept-Language:en-US,en;q=0.5Accept-Encoding:gzip,deflateContent-type:application/x-www-form-urlencodedReferer:http://www.debate.org...=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none);__unam=513d65-15e63676ba4-7855355e-2;__utmb=101980692.2.10.1504908512;__utmt=1DNT:1Connection:keep-aliveid=103799, Your personal beliefs does not represent the rest of the world. So don't drag the world into a connection with your personal beliefs. Age of consent is not a requirement but a choice made by conservatives to be followed. In that sense, the conservative world is different from the rest of the world. Because your beliefs are only valid within the conservative community. Your studies are based within the realms of the conservative world but that means nothing to people outside your community. Age does not exist and have everything to do with this debate seeing how you brought up "children" and "kids" in your response. Also a conservative "fantasy" is the rest of the worlds reality and vice versa. So naturally, you would think the way you do. Laws does not control the human element. The people thinks for themselves. The law is a basic outline of the ideology of the current and/or past government in question. But it is not a boundary or a restriction (although some people treat it as such) and it is not a tool to promote or enforced a dictatorship. Also laws constantly are changed and updated. Laws are not written in stone and are open to interpretation. The conservative interpretation of law is different from the open minded community. So law has nothing to do with this debate. In fact it would be more of a trap to include law in this debate in order to force someone into submission of a conservative agenda. To hide behind the law in order to control the situation in their favour instead of allowing things to progress in a natural pace. To turn this debate towards the law, is admitting that you can't think for yourself. Relying on conservative doctrine to fight against a liberal society is not allowing your side to be properly represented because your words becomes moot and lost in translation (conservative language to open minded language). The fact that you continue to use the same argument that is based on "age" and discriminatory tiles based on age, shows that you lack a open mind and came here with a hidden agenda in order to convert the open minded to a conservative slave with an imitated form of free will and free thinking. Look at the people who lose their jobs and their lives because of the madness of the government in result of the "sexual predators listing". Who does that benefit? Nobody. Because the people who are suppressed and oppressed does not receive the same justice as everyone else. This is a form of censorship. We the people are being punished by the government via laws because we live our lives and do things that are different from the understanding and beliefs of the government. This closed minded avenue of governance is bringing us to our doom because it promotes that the government can control us but we as people have no control over ourselves. To divide the people with titles like "paedophiles", therefore leads to the division of society. Just like when the term "faggot" is used in relevance to the LGBTPQ community, it shows the prevalent lack of tolerance and respect towards each other. Or when the term "terrorist" is attached to Muslims and people from the middle east, that shows the existence of a divided establishment. Or when "illegal immigrants" is attached to people who come into America in a non conservative way, it shows that there is no respect to the people who have come to America to live better lives and/or to provide a service to those they love. When the word "nigger" was attached to people with darker skin (not "white") this shows the relevance of racism and bigotry in our society. To call people names and to label and judge them rather personally or through the law is the division of humanity. Where the "faggot" or the "illegal immigrant" is treated far worse than the conservative/Christian who gave them those names in the first place. Where will it end? The segregation of the people by the closed minded person. Total madness. We the people deserve better as living things on this earth. That means all people. So what is a "kid"? You are making no sense. There is nothing selfish about s