Atheism is based on ignorance

I will start by saying that Atheism claims that God "probably" doesn't exist as if it were scientifically proven. No scientific evidence exists to prove that God does not exist. Neither have atheists come up with a mathematical model for their claims. There are several reasons for attacking the Bible: 1. It's not backed up by science (many things aren't backed up by science, but from experience, no other book or belief is as attacked as much as the Bible) 2. They think it's dangerous to society (no evidence, many things are dangerous to society) 3. People don't need the Bible anymore because it's such an ancient book (Water is ancient, lets not drink water) That being said, lets review their methods of attacking the Bible: 1. Finding contradictions within the Bible 2. Judging God as immoral 3. Claiming science and history have disproven the many claims of the Bible 4. Using various logical arguments against God's existence and character 5. Placing the Bible in the same level as other religions I will start by exposing the flaws of each method: 1. Atheists will typically attempt to find contradictions within Scripture to show it's inconsistency, however it is nearly impossible to find a contradiction in the Bible namely because there's so many different axioms going (in 1 verse, it refers to one thing and in another, it can refer to another thing) on and the Bible must always be read in context. Of course, if you take two isolated verses, you may think you found a contradiction, but it's only because you took it out of context. 2. Many atheists will judge God as a malevolent being and claim that the Bible is full of genocide, murder, rape, violence, etc. however they lack an understanding of how God works. For example, in Exodus 20:13, it says "13 """You shall not murder [ratsach]. That is a very different term than putting to death which is muwth (Lev. 20:10). Many fail to provide a solid definition of "good" and "evil", so it is futile to attempt to use God's Law and social morals to judge him. 3. This claim is false because science has never disproven the Bible. A few examples can be found at this link (1). Archaeology itself has confirmed the Bible's historical accuracy (2). 4. Many logical arguments such as Omnipotence paradox (Can God make a rock so big he cannot lift?) in an attempt to disprove his existence, however because God cannot deny himself (2 Timothy 2:13) he cannot defeat himself, therefore this argument is meaningless. You cannot use logic alone to discredit God because there is a very flimsy definition of God. Knowing who God is through the Bible thus creates a stronger definition consistent with the Bible's logic. 5. Atheists will most often compare the Bible to other religions asking you "Why the Bible? Why believe in the Bible? What about Buddhism? Shintoism? Islam? etc." This argument fails because not all religions are compatible in terms of belief. The Bible is one of the few religions which has a concept of faith in God, other religions don't care such as Buddhism (1). In the Bible, only those who have faith in Jesus will be saved. In Judaism, everyone can do good and be saved (3). In Buddhism and Hinduism, reincarnation is a continual process rather than a final judgement. It's often claimed by atheists that we can be "good" without God, but i have yet to see a fully developed system based on completely rational arguments. Most of the morality i see stems from the Bible. I have a lot more to say, so i will wait my opponent's response next round. Sources: 1. http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com... 2. http://www.ucg.org... 3. http://en.wikipedia.org...