Meat, dairy, and eggs should be banned worldwide.

"Rebuttal of Pro's argument. 1. Pro assumed I was talking about Hinduism,when I was actually talking about Christianity.One of the Bible verses I.was referring to is Genesis 9:3 it says "Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you"... " Con Pro has tricked Con into revealing his or her ideology. Pro figured it was easier to argue about one religion as opposed to every religion in the same post. " 2. Pro has said that in even small scale farming theres cruelty. Con's response is that if you believe there is some cruelty in the way they do things,then you should try to ban some of the ways they do things.so then the farmers would have to farm in a humane way.Instead of banning all meat and dairy products." Con Pro contends that these foods have other problems other than animal cruelty. "3. pro says there is no way to kill a animal without causing suffering. I Con disagrees. There are many humane ways to kill a animal. Example 1 filling a room with co2 then put the animals in they pass out without pain.Example 2 Shooting a animal in the head causes instant death and no pain,Example 3 Beheading is a a good way to kill chickens,it causes instant death." Con Animals are sentient as explained in round 2 Pro's argument. If humans haven't found a way to execute another human painlessly and reliably then it must be impossible for an animal. If co2 runs the risk of accidentally killing the executioner. Shooting may not kill the animal with one shot. Same with example number three. "4. Pro says people who eat meat are disobeying the sixth commandment and are being greedy. I Con disagrees. First off eating meat. is not breaking the sixth commandment because when God says thou shalt not kill he was only talking about humans and not animals" Con True, about the sixth commandment and animals. Pro wasn't referencing killing of animals and the sixth commandment. Common definition of greed ": a selfish and excessive desire for more of something (as money) than is needed " [26]. Now to see if the biblical version of greed matches the common. "Psalm 37:21 " "The wicked borrows and does not pay back, but the righteous is generous and gives."" [27.] Seems that the definitions match up. By continuing to eat meat pound after pound, day after day, you are taking more than your fair share. You are taking more than is needed. Pro asserts that eating meat routinely is practicing greed. "I con believes it is not greedy to eat meat,only if you overeat" Con Pro thinks eating meat within itself is overeating. Since more grain is needed to feed a person on meat than on grain. " People who I consider to overeat are obsese people with a bmi of 30 or higher and not average people." Con Small children are often obese who have little control over their lives. Certain illnesses help cause obesity. "5. Pro says we are killing people by air pollution,global climate change,and are out competing 3rd world countries by giving grain to livestock and not starving people. I Con disagrees Pro does not have evidence for his listed claims." Con Pro thought air pollution and global climate change were common knowledge. The out completing 3rd world countries claim was backed up by the quote from the animalliberationfront. [24]. Con criticizes Pro for lack of evidence yet, Con has no outside sources. Air pollution kills millions of people each year. "Pollution Killed 7 Million People Worldwide in 2012, Report Finds" [28]. There is substantial evidence that global climate change exists. [29]. What do you think will happen when the ocean waters rise? Deaths will surely follow, and you will be partly to blame if you are greedy by eating meat. As for gluttony, gluttony is linked with pleasure seeking. "We enter into Gluttony when we demand more pleasure from something than it was made for."[30]. Seems to me most people eat meat out of pleasure seeking as opposed to substance. There is so many choices in the 1st world. There is no logical reason to eat meat. " 6. I Con stated in round 2 that it would be very hard for most people to live on just a vegetarian diet,and it would cause malnutrition.Pro disagreed But I Con will stand by my statement." Con Con, have you ever heard of 7th day Adventist? "A new study averaged the mood swings of 60 vegetarian Seventh-Day Adventists and 78 meat-eating Adventists. Each participant took a 30 minute survey, listing some meals and ranking their moods from the previous week." [31]. 7th day Adventists are renowned for their vegetarian lifestyle and good health. "7. Pro says that being vegetarian would help the environment ,I Con thinks that it would have little or no change on the environment." Con Pro provides evidence, Con does not. "Feeding 7 billion people a vegetarian diet would cause just as much harm to the environment as it does to raise grain for the livestock to eat. " Con The evidence Pro has supplied does not support Con's claim. Con provides no evidence. "I think pro's arguments are weak and illogical.." Con Con can make broad unsubstantiated claims all he or she wants. How is Pro's arguments weak and illogical be specific? Thanks for the debate. Meat, dairy, and eggs should be banned worldwide because Pro provides evidence and Con does not. Links 26. http://www.merriam-webster.com... 27. http://www.christianpost.com... 28. http://www.nytimes.com... 29. http://www.takepart.com... 30. http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net... 31. http://letthemeatmeat.com...