Britain's immigration service should introduce Kuwaiti-style gay detectors.

To win the debate, Pro had to prove that Britain should buy the Kuwaiti gay-detectors. He didn't come close to proving that.Pro ended up with an argument that Britain should buy them without knowing what they are or seeing any scientific studies about them, because his hunch says that Kuwait is working on some super-duper advanced technology. This might pass in a conversation with a Taxi driver, but definitely not here in DDO. In the current sitatuon, Britian should wait till the required information and studies are out, in order to decide whether she wants them or not.Points of agreement:1- Kuwaiti gay-detectors remain unknown and concealed from the public.2- Kuwait has not released scientific papers and researches on the effectiveness of such detectors.3- The gay-detectors could be anything, and might very well be ineffective and unreliable.Pro's multi-stage homosexuality-detection procedurePro gave us a four-step procedure which consists of researched techniques present and researched in the western world, and claimed they are very effective in detecting homosexuality. Pro's argument is self-contradictory at best:P1- We need the Kuwaiti gay detectors to detect homosexuality in Britain. [Pro's position]P2- We already have a multi-staged procedure that can detect homosexuality [Pro's claim]Conclusion: We don't need the Kuwaiti gay detectors. [My position]...In an attempt to avoid this contradiction, Pro made the following claim...Pro claims, "Western pharmaceutical companies would be unlikely to invest in the development of gay detectors for fear of attracting adverse publicity."Rebuttal: This contradicts some of what Pro said in the previous round. He clearly stated that Putin is a homophobe. Why then does he assume that Russian pharmaceutical companies wouldn't invest in the development of such technology? Russia is a Western nation after all; the dicthomy between east and west is cultural and not purely geographical as one might think. And Russia has a long history of scientific achievements, while Kuwait doesn't. Not to mention that the US is full of proud homophobes, some of which happen to be filthy-rich right-wingers who would run fast-food companies that proudly support homophobia. Why wouldn't they invest in such detectors? They could use them in churches to confirm what priests shouldn't come close to Altar boys.Pro could have rescued his position if he proved that the Kuwaiti gay-detectors are superior to the four-staged procedure he described. Nonetheless, he conceded that the Kuwaiti gay-detectors are unknown.Pro could have argued (but he didn't) that Kuwait's gay-detectors are the only available solution and so we should get them because of the urgency of the matter. To defeat Pro's resolution, I would have been forced to point out that this is not the case. However, Pro didn't.Kuwait and highly advanced technologyPro made many flimsy arguments to say that Kuwait must have advanced technology beneath its sleeves. I would like to refute those arguments before closing the debate.Pro says, "Firstly, we should remember that the Arab world was the cradle of civilisation and much of what we know in the West about science ultimately stems from Arabia..."Rebuttal: The Islamic golden age is actually a highly-doubted historic theory. The counter-view is that most of the Science came from outside Arabia[1]. Pro continues, "... so we shouldn't underestimate the Kuwaitis' capacity to develop a clinical homosexual screening technique independent of Western scientists." Rebuttal: Even if we assume science stemmed out of Arabia, it is logically fallacious to assume that the scientific state of such a region has been preserved all those centuries. Let us not forget what came after the "Islamic golden age": Ignorance, persecution, conservatism, underdevelopment and religious verdicts against philosophy and the early sciences[2]. Kuwait is actually lacking in terms of scientific studies, researches and achievements. The currently leading country in the Middle East is Israel which is superior in both education and research faculties[3].In summary, Pro has failed to prove to us that Kuwait is capable of advanced technology and research, but instead used flimsy arguments on the ancient history of the region to support his position. That is like employing Egyptians to build your house because Ancient Egyptians were once great architects.---Pro managed to offer a relatively good procedure to detect homosexuals. However, the multiple tests were all researched by western colleges, and hence Britain doesn't really need Kuwait to detect homosexuals. There are peer-reviewed studies of how we could implement the tests ourselves. Englishmen are better off building their own tools.In summary, Pro didn't prove that we have to get the Kuwaiti gay-detectors, but instead offered us good reasons not to.Thanks for reading,[1] youtube.com/watch?v=lH595DMVs-E[2] history-science-technology.com/Articles/articles%208.htm[3] haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israel-ranks-fourth-in-the-world-in-scientific-activity-study-finds-1.4034