Prosthetic breasts and vaginas should be banned from sale

Thanks for starting this debate, I hope it proves interesting. Also, to everyone voting on this debate, please vote on who does the better debating, uses logic and reasoning, not just your opinion. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- My opponent provides no evidence besides a forum discussion, discussing OPINIONS on why Lady Gaga is a man. Even if proven that Lady Gaga is a man, using it as a cover-up to deceive the record-buying company, the probability of that occurring enough to actually give reason to ban production of hence items is slim to nothing. Currently, still pending credible evidence in this debate, there is only one person using that as a tactic in the music business. So this argument should be disregarded for many reasons. Probability, since it is unlikely to happen enough to matter. Magnitude, since that happening isn't enough to give reason we should ban such things. My opponent's second and last argument was about how men will buy these items t sneak into public bathrooms or showers to spy on girls. This is illogical for so many reasons. 1) This is sexist, claiming that men would do this, without evidence to back it up. 2) Without evidence, how do we know it will happen a lot, if proven to happen at all. Drop this argument due to lack of evidence, logic or analysis. To conclude my attack on his arguments, he has provided no credible evidence, no logic or analysis. His arguments are improbable, impact-less, and give you no reason to affirm the resolution. ------------------------------------------------------------------- I strongly negate that "Prosthetic breasts and vagina's should be banned from sale", due to the inherent lack of analysis on my opponents side. It is assumed that such items are only used for peeping at women in public places, but in fact, these things were originated for other purposes. 1) Prosthetic breasts and vagina's were originally made to cover up body flaws Prosthetic legs were made for people who lost a leg, be it in war, accidents, or birth defect. Prosthetic vagina's or breasts were made for that reason as well. Take victims of breast cancer, who lost a breast due to, well cancer. Should they be denied the availability to make themselves happy, to compensate for there loss? An estimated 42,016 women have suffered from breast cancer.[1] By affirming this topic, you are pissing that many people off. Seeing as the Pro doesn't give any statistical data to support the notion that these items will be used in a way to peep at woman, then we assume I make 42,016 more people happy than the Pro. 2) People have the right to look and be who they want to be Is it right to tell someone they cannot wear a hat in public? Is it right to tell someone they cannot wear shoes? Or even if they can't wear a prosthetic leg. That's up to the voters to decide, but in my opinion, no. The majority of people with those items are using them for personal purposes, not for malicious intentions. The biggest reason you will vote Con today is that by affirming the resolution, you allow an unproven hypothetical scenario stop people from either A) Expressing themselves or B) Covering up flaws in there body. Look at the Pros case this way: "Cars should be banned from sale because they have been known to be the transportation of criminals, abductors, and other malicious individuals. I urge you to negate. Thank you. 1] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...