Wizard's Quidditch Should be Banned

Final Round.Rebuttals 1. Is Quidditch BrilliantLast round I explained why I thought it is a brilliant sport. It was part of my burden of proof to show why it was too good to be banned. My opponent rebuts this, but I don't think that is necerssary because he is trying to show why the sport should be banned. Even if it was the most stupid sport in the world it wouldn't matter because thats not reason enough for the sport to be banned.2. Quidditch's popularity"There's a reason we banned collesium battles, they used to be popular, but people were dying too much and losing too much blood," That why most gladiators were slaves. Your analogy doesn't hold up because Quidditch doesn't have the number of accidental deaths that the required deaths of the Colliseum. 3. The Dumb SnitchThat is a very good point and I cannot rebut it without contradicting myself. Yet I still ask why this means we should ban the sport altogether. Also, you didn't answer my question as to how you know for certain the boringness of a month-long match."the rules are quite difficult to change, so changing these dumb rules in Hogwarts would be extremely difficult, so why not ban them completely?" So, just writing something down and posting it to the governors and the sport staff is much more difficult than putting in place a full ban?4. Ban use of wands?What does any of this have to do with anything? "Wow, that's totally not limiting the wizard's freedom of expression." Well why not say players cannot bring their wands at all, that solves this....expression problem?5. Death by Quidditch"Oh come on, we're talking as if Quidditch was real." What are you talking about, of course Quidditch is real. Are you calling me a liar sir? ARE YOU CHALLENGING ME TO A WIZARDS DUEL SIR? "Even wizards cannot survive such a huge fall." Well they must have for the last 1000 years the sport has been play. Or they are very good at staying on their brooms.7. Magic Props"What I meant was, although everyone is forced to play, they would be unwilling to do so due to the injuries possible and the possibility of Slytherien cheating." First, no-one is forced to play, except in the training which Harry and his friends had in first year but never had again for some reason. Second, you haven't rebutted the point that hufflepuffs and ravenclaws have played, despite the risk."As for muggle quidditch, my opponent hasn't countered that point." Muggle Quidditch? MUGGLE QUIDDITCH! How did those people find out about quidditch? What have those lazy idiots and the ministry of magic been doing to ensure the statute of secrecy? "He has yet to make a case for why the 150 Snitch is better than that 30 point snitch." I don't see why I have to. Once again, the flaws in the sport do not mean it should be banned. I think 150 is too high but I also think 30 points is too low but I'm sure there is a middle ground. A simple shifting of numbers is much more simpler than banning the sport. I think the Ministry are fools if they wish to allow muggles to learn of our presence and sport yet arrest young wizards for preforming patronus charms, even though they were threatened by an actual threat. I also think they are fools for trying ban an 1000 year old sport, an international sport rooted in history, with the reason that it is flawed when it comes to the role of seeker and the snitch. I would just like to ask them one thing: how much revenue was collected at the 1994 world cup?Vote for me if you don't want to see this sport thrown away like the flying carpets. In the words of Ludo Bagman, "They'll never get rid of brooms!"