The Need For a Presient/ Prime Minister

I accept my opponent debate! I hope we will have a good debate.Now, my opponent state "i simply do not see why we should have main person in power"?What is the definiton of a President A president is a leader of an organization, company, club, trade union, university, country, a division or part of any of these, or, more generally, anything else. Etymologically, a president is one who presides, (from Latin prae- "before" + sedere "to sit"; giving the term praeses). Originally, the term referred to the presiding officer of a ceremony or meeting (i.e., chairman), but today it most commonly refers to an official. Among other things, "President" today is a common title for the heads of state of most republics, whether popularly elected, chosen by the legislature or by a special electoral college. -Well if we do not have main person in power who runs the affair of the Country? or the affair of a organization, company, club, trade union, university. The reason we have main person in power is to act on behalf of the people. Though that is not what is always happening. The powers vested in such (presidents) vary considerably. Some presidencies, such as that of Ireland, are largely ceremonial, whereas other systems vest the President with substantive powers such as the appointment and dismissal of prime ministers or cabinets, the power to declare war, and powers of veto on legislation. In many nations the President is also the Commander-in-Chief of the nation's armed forces, though once again this can range from a ceremonial role to one with considerable authority. -If there is no President or a head of state who declare war? Not everyone. Because if we have everyone decide if we should go to war it will be a constant debate. And before we ever make a decision we'll probably get attack again. If there is no president who vetos on legislation? With a President of sort of laws may be passed the alot of people may not like. If there is no President than how will a bill be passed because some legislature may not want it while others may! If there is no President who is the Commander-in-Chief of the nation's armed forces. Not everyone will be commander-in-cheif of the Amred Forces.The President of the United States of America is the head of state and head of government of the United States. The president is at the head of the executive branch of the federal government, whose role is to enforce national law as given in the Constitution and written by Congress. Article Two of the Constitution establishes the president as commander-in-chief of the armed forces and enumerates powers specifically granted to the president, including the power to sign into law or veto bills passed by both houses of Congress. The president also has the power to create a cabinet of advisers and to grant pardons or reprieves. Finally, with the "advice and consent" of the Senate, the president is empowered to make treaties and appoint federal officers ambassadors, and federal judges, including Justices of the Supreme Court. As with officials in the other branches of the United States government, the Constitution restrains the president with a set of checks and balances designed to prevent any individual or group from taking absolute power." Why do we need a President Anyway?" Only after a fizzled attempt to run the country through disparate committees in individual states did the creators of the United States Constitution decide at a historic convention in 1787 that there needed to be a strong national government with a leader on top. "Things were not really efficient without an executive that has a certain amount of power," said James Pfiffner, a political scientist at George Mason University in Arlington, Virginia. Psychologically, he added, people like to have leaders to look up to."Final: Because self governing with this many people probally wouldn't go over very well.http://news.discovery.com...http://en.wikipedia.org...;http://answers.yahoo.com...;