Flying Spaghetti Monster v. Abrahamic God

Oi, my fault i didn"t define my position. Yes if you need evidence for young earth creationism go to answers in genesis, but i"m old earth evolutionist. I do believe in old Universe and in evolution. If you want to know how can Christian believe in this you can read John C. Lennox book ,,Seven days that divide the world" or you can get a new book by Ronald E.Osborn ,,Death before the fall" About flood i"m not really sure. I think i agree with Hugh Ross view about flood. But i"m not sure about that. I do believe that bible is 100% word of God and has no errors, but the question is interpretation here. I believe and i can show you that old earth not only doesn"t contradict bible, but goes really well with it. What about slaves in Egypt? First of all you can get 47 page book of this question for free. Just go to www.biblicalarchaeology.org and search ,,Slaves in Egypt" and find a free e-book. There's no proof that Mount Sinai ever even existed. Well historians aren"t sure about where it was. Some think Har Karkom. Just because we aren"t sure what was the mountain that doesn"t show that record was wrong. See- http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org... 8 people(family) repopulating the earth. I"m not a scientific apologist. I"m focusing on theology and maybe history. I will just direct you to reasons.org http://www.reasons.org... Behemoth- I don"t believe that"s dinosaur. Job is written in poetic way and that is poetic description. That"s most likely hippopotamus. Read Hugh Ross book ,,Hidden treasures in book of Job" author explains this. I don"t have to answer attacks on 6000 year old earth. Because I agree that its old. Jesus a. First of all we still have multiple sources even if you don"t believe they wrote it. Second why don"t you accept biblical sources as evidence? Third we have early church fathers. B. Problem of source- I just pointed out that there are some problems, but text still supports my point even if there are some corruptions. And that"s only one of two places Josephus talks about Jesus. Also, even if Jesus existed, that in no way proves that he was the son of god. Agree, but that"s not my point. I pointed out that we are talking about real historical person. Again Jesus existence is almost not questioned by NT scholars/Historians except some individuals who don"t represent even highly skeptical scholars. C) Roman sources: Suetonius, Tacitus, Pliny the younger. Ok, but you still don"t ave any evidence for him. My faith is based on real historical person your position is based on something someone said. How do you know your right and Mormons, Muslims, Buddhists are wrong because they also claim the same. Yes I agree Jesus could free himself without any problems. But you don"t understand why he did that. He did that because God is a perfect being, who is perfectly loving, but in the same time perfectly just. The same way judge cannot be just by just forgiving a crime, God can"t just forgive. Every crime must be punished, but he took our punishment on himself once and for all. Could me made them to believe? Yes, by forcing them. But why do think he needed to force them into believing? Did Paul met Jesus? No, I believe not. Can we trust he"s records about Jesus if he didn"t met him? Yes, if he"s sources come from disciples. Was Jesus body physical. Well what resurrection meant to a Jew of that time. Only physical event, if he thought he saw a spirit that wouldn"t be called resurrection. That"s why they were putting bones of dead in boxes. They believed that one day body will rise again. Read some Craig Evans books about that. Christ never called himself Christian- Christian means follower of Christ, why would Jesus call himself follower of Christ? That name come started after Christ"s death. 4b Yes and I think that"s where Islam has the biggest problem to solve. They must disagree with modern NT scholars because their faith doesn"t allow. if this is a fact, then why do 1/3 of all follower of the Abrahamic god disagree? Because they are following 7th century Arab who shows really weak understanding of Christianity himself. C) Would anybody believe that Tom Cruise saw Jesus? He's a non-Christian. No, saying that you saw somebody doesn"t mean truth, but if you are ready to get tortured for that then I at least have to conclude you believed that you saw him. No I"m just stating facts about Jesus death burial and appearances which even skeptic agree. I don"t think I"m forcing evidence here the same way you do. The Qur'an is the word of Pro's god as well. Is this Pro admitting to being wrong? What? If bible is true Qur'an is false and if Qur'an is true bible is false. We can"t put then together. I do not believe that Qur'an is word of God. Its written by 7th century Arab who as I pointed out probably didn"t even understand our faith well. Other points We have no reason to believe that the founder of your religion had faced any non natural force. But we have good reason to think that followers of Jesus experienced it. We have really good evidence that at least 20 people died proclaiming that he was risen and good point can be made about over 500 recorded in 1 Corinthians 15:6. Look at this quote by Pliny the Younger: ,,I have never been present at an examination of Christians. Consequently, I do not know the nature of the extent of the punishments usually meted out to them, nor the grounds for starting an investigation and how far it should be pressed"I have asked them if they are Christians, and if they admit it, I repeat the question a second and third time, with a warning of the punishment awaiting them. If they persist, I order them to be led away for execution; for, whatever the nature of their admission, I am convinced that their stubbornness and unshakeable obstinacy ought not to go unpunished"They also declared that the sum total of their guilt or error amounted to no more than this: they had met regularly before dawn on a fixed day to chant verses alternately amongst themselves in honor of Christ as if to a god, and also to bind themselves by oath, not for any criminal purpose, but to abstain from theft, robbery, and adultery,"This made me decide it was all the more necessary to extract the truth by torture from two slave-women, whom they call deaconesses. I found nothing but a degenerate sort of cult carried to extravagant lengths." Wilkins, Michael J.; Moreland, J. P. (2010-12-21). Jesus Under Fire: Modern Scholarship Reinvents the Historical Jesus Also we have non Christian sources recording that world went dark+earthquake recorded by Thallus, but we only have hes work in Julius Africanus writings who quoted him. I can't post the full quote because its to long, but you can find it in: Julius Africanus, Extant Writings, XVIII in The Ante"Nicene Fathers, ed. by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1973), vol. VI, p. 130 You can get it free on e-sword bible software. He records: ,,On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun. " Then we have Josephus in Antiquities 18.3.3 probably records him as miracle work even if we remove forged parts of that. Then we have Babylonian Talmud 43a in which we see a lot of bad things said about Jesus, but he did do magic. And again we have christian sources. Even skeptical scholars at least believe that they thought he did miracles. Conclusion about round 1) I don't think my opponent refuted any of 5 facts about Jesus resurrection or gave alternative explanation of them. 2)I don't think he gave good reasons to believe f.s.m