freedom of religion in USA should not involve freedom to *fully* practice old testament judiasm

I spent almost my entire first round describing how central the oral law is to Judaism. The oral law is not a new version of Judaism in order to be American, it's the tradition that Jews have kept for thousands of years. Be that as it may, whether my opponent agrees that the bible was given with an oral tradition is irrelevant because the question is what does Old Testament JUDAISM believe. So it's not "many" Jews "made" oral laws in order to be "considered" to be following Judaism. No this is what according to the Old Testament a Jew is obligated to do right now. What my opponent said that there's no reason it couldn't be practiced that way is totally ignoring everything that I said. Namely that the according to "old testament Judaism" yes it cannot be practiced that way rather exactly the way religious Jews keep it. If indeed Judaism would demand a different set of rules against the constitution, I can assure you that religious Jews would listen to the torah before listening to the laws of the constitution. So to sum it up "old testament Judaism" is completely and fully practiced so I won the title of the debate. Now I noticed that my opponent basically completely ignored a basic point that I made that Judaism's laws are addressed to the Jewish people as stated countless times in the bible. Now she went on to say that when the temple will be standing then the USA should not allow Jews to practice Judaism. So first of all, the title of the debate was using the present form, I wasn't aware that were discussing the time when the temple will be rebuilt. But I'll respond anyways. There is only one location where the temple can be built and especially the altar has to be built on one exact location. Now since we simply don't know where that is we have no way of building the temple until g-d wants it to be rebuilt. According to Judaism this will happen in the times of the messiah. That being the case your argument is wrong for three reasons. A.it says in psalms that messiah will rule the entire world so I don't know if their will be the United States B. According to the bible all the Jews will be in the land of Israel in the times of messiah, so there's nothing to worry about because like I said the laws of the bible are directed at the Jewish people C. the main point, in that era as it's described no one will even want to do anything other than what g-d wants, so it will perfectly compatible with freedom of religion in the USA. Now obviously I've been ignoring the elephant in the room. That is to say that the point of my opponent is that the laws of the bible are unjust and wrong (g-d forbid). So although it's not relevant to the title of debate I'll discuss it a little bit. But before I do I'll be honest I'm very bewildered my opponent is a Christian. In other words she believes that g-d almighty is the author of the bible. She is criticizing g-d I find that amazing. It's one thing to say it's man made, but to say that g-d wrote it, but that he's wrong, is the most wild thing that I have ever heard. Now I could go through different laws in the bible and show based on the Talmud that many many commandments are totally misunderstood. But that would take too much time, so for now I'll just focus on something that seems to bother my opponent and that is the death penalty in the Old Testament, for things that she considers trivial. Now just so the crowd is aware of the discussion let's review the laws of the bible. There are 36 things for which one can get killed. 18 of them are sexual relations (bestiality, homosexuality, adultery and incestuous relationships), 10 of them are different forms of idol worship. Then there are two laws which the criteria is so wild to be killed that it's said in the Talmud that it's more in place to teach a lesson then to be carried out (again Judaism says this not some apologetics) and that is the law of the rebellious judge and the wayward son. A murderer is put to death. A false prophet and a kidnapper. Now for the most controversial laws in the bible one who curses his parents with the name of g-d, one who strikes his father, and one that desecrates the Shabbat. Now I'll be honest I personally don't find it disturbing because I never considered myself to be the authority on what's trivial and what's not. Imagine billions of dollars are spent to fly a rocket ship to mars, astronauts have been trained for years, and tens of thousands of people have devoted decades of their life for this moment. And all of a sudden as they're taking off one astronaut wants to take a smoke, and he doesn't understand what the big deal is, can you imagine the outrage. The parable is that Judaism believes that the word was created for the purpose of keeping the torah. The world is on a mission and were heading to a beautiful place, any situation g-d puts us in is part of the mission. So yes if these 36 things warrant the death sentence that means that they are not trivial at all. Now there's something else that's very important to keep in mind, g-d runs this world and always has. Point being that the reason why we biblically can't do the death penalty, is orchestrated by g-d, it's because since we don't live in the world where these truths are so clear, we cannot hold the person responsible to the point of death for his terrible sin, for the sinner simply doesn't understand the gravity of what they're doing. Now one final point is warranted and that is that if you look at the conditions under which the death sentence is carried out it's very hard to put someone to death. There has to be two kosher witnesses, they have to warn him exactly what sin he is transgressing and what the punishment will be, he must commit the sin within a few seconds of the warning so as not to have the excuse that he forgot the warning, he has to respond to show that he heard the warning and doesn't care. These laws apply accept for the case of murder in which the person is executed as long as there's no shadow of a doubt that the person killed another person intentionally.