Does Ohrmazd exist

" In the name of the creator Ohrmazd. " ─ BundahishnThank you to " Inquisitive " for beginning the debate.─────────────────────One. Cosmogony─────────────────────This argument for Ohrmazd is very simple. It's similar to the kalam argument presented by the Christian arguer William Craig. We can defend " the Universe, at some finite time in the past, began to exist " using modern science ─ the " Big Bang, " a modern astronomical concept, has profound evidence in favor of its truth, such as the expansion of the Universe, the existence of background radiation, and the widespread existence of the lightest elements (Cornish). The " Big Bang " thus represents the beginning of the " celestial sphere " (a term used by the Bundahishn) billions of years ago. It is ridiculous to deny " if anything begins to exist, then it has a cause of its existence ". The Western thinker David Hume, argued that since we can imagine it, it must be possible. But this is fallacious, because our imagination doesn't determine reality. I can imagine any number of things that are impossible. This premise seems true both from our experience and from our intuition from how the world works! If " the Universe at some finite time in the past began to exist " is true, and " if anything begins to exist, then it has a cause of its existence " is true, then we must agree that the Universe has a cause. We also are right in thinking this is God, or Ohrmazd, for only a willful being could create a Universe with a finite past.─────────────────────Two. Morals─────────────────────We all know that morals exist. We know that the Nazi's who created the Holocaust that killed the Jews were wrong, and we know that the Christian's who begin charities and feed people do morally good things. So we have established that morality does exist. If an Aztec person thinks that feeding the hungry is morally wrong, would that change your mind on the moral goodness of feeding the hungry? Any reasonable person would not accept all culture's morality over their own. So we know that morality is independent of whatever place you live in ─ morality exists in the heart, and is there when our conscience tells us something is right or wrong. As Adarbad Mahraspandan said in his Counsels, " think upon virtue and do not turn your thoughts to sin. " Our very intuition and conscience, with all individuals, would agree that morals exist. But how do morals exist? If we are the result of a mindless universe, then there is no axiomatic moral value that could come out of it in the way we see. It makes sense to ascribe moral values to God, or Ohrmazd, who declares to us to live our lives in a good way. So Ohrmazd is the best explanation for morals.─────────────────────Three. What Does this Mean for Ohrmazd?─────────────────────Well, we know that Ohrmazd exists because of the Universe and because of morals. So even if one of the two arguments is false, the other would still lead to the conclusion that Ohrmazd exists. I will defend both of these in my coming rounds, but please be cognisant that if either is true and valid, then it is sound and Ohrmazd exists. Else, Ohrmazd does not exist and my opponent will win the debate. ─────────────────────Four. Bibliography─────────────────────Cornish, Neil J., and Jeffrey R. Weeks. Measuring the Shape of the Universe. " Big Bang Cosmology. " 1998. page 1