Adam And Eve Story In The Bible Never Happened

Appeal to Science What you are doing is saying “Science disproves! Science disproves!” The problem is that science isn’t founded off of truth, it’s founded off of explanation. For example, in physics there is something called absolute time and space, and this is where classical mechanics contradicts with special relativity. It doesn’t matter how well established the science is, there still something fundamentally wrong because they contradict. So they aren’t founded off of truth, but explanations and can be incorrect. Science has been known to be fallible, an example being the radioisotope dating (I’ll use this example because its herald to be reliable by people of simplicity). Yes, they’ve had to recalculate out the dates of the earth before. http://www.icr.org... This fallacy is kind of like the appeal to authority, just because some authority says something doesn’t mean it’s true. Because authorities can be wrong. Likewise, science can be contradictive, and fallible. I won’t be convinced until you can prove to me that science is 100% correct all the time, which is just flat out untrue. Scientifically impossible Not really. And I’m skeptical of the “forensics” craft of genetics anyway, most of them presume evolution to be true, something that has never been empirically proven. No one has ever observed one life-form evolving into a higher life-form. “forensics” as you call it can state whatever it wants, just because something or someone states something doesn’t mean it’s true. Earth is older than 4,000 years old This is typical of science. the earth is 40,000 years one day then the next day say I’m older. It will not stop. Just shows how unreliable it is. If they want to believe the earth is old because some unreliable dating method told them to… That’s their folly, not mine! To me it’s all theoretical and not provable. Adam’s Daughters See gen 5:4, mentions that he fathered sons and “daughters”. Discussion of the fruit You might be miss interpreting the tree of knowledge. You seem to be interpreting as “give” knowledge (like literally uploaded good and evil "information"). But could have given them understanding, or a sense of clarity… a way to receive information than simply uploading information into your mind. As it said “their eyes were opened” when they saw each other naked, even though they knew they were naked previously, they had a new understanding on how to see things as opposed to new knowledge. Some herbs have been known to effect clarity of mind. Drug addicts have been known to perceive things differently than normal. Food & drinks can effect behavior (e.g. sugar and caffeine). It’s not implausible that some fruits can have a psychological effect on people (how they interpret information), after all other consumption items seem to do. “A scoffer seeks wisdom in vain, but knowledge is easy for a man of understanding.”--------- Proverbs 14:6 Science has a subjective nature to it I feel like I should point out that science is subjective. At one point in time alchemy would have been considered science for they say “knowledge I have, I know! I know!” Or Welteislehre (world ice theory). There are scientist that do disagree with each other, such as the existence of gravity (Eric Verlinde) The reason why I make a point about this is because I will probably disagree with pro on presumptions that his sources make. Such as the assumption of an old earth, it’s an assumption because no one has lived long enough to test the validity of the claim (it’s only theoretical because it can’t be observed by anyone). Obviously there are scientist that disagree on the earth age, because there does exist creationist scientist that operate on different presumptions then other scientist do. Vocal Cords & Language You assume that you need vocal cords to speak in a language. That’s not necessary true, some languages don’t need a complex instrument of tones (vocal cords) to operate. There does exist a language that only operates off of two kinds of noises, such as Morse code. So if it’s possible to speak in dots and dashes, surely it’s possible to speak in snake hisses. I understand that you may not believe in animal languages, but I do. I do believe that animals communicate with each other daily. For a bee does complex dances to signal to the hive that it’s found an area to pollinate, and a crow will communicate through a crow to other crows when it spots an intruder. I just think their way to speak to each other is far different then our way, and much more difficult to understand. Also, your claim that caveman actually didn’t know even the simplest of languages. How do you know that? Bring me a caveman that I may see and verify that that’s true. For I know that you don't know because you never met one.