The winner of debates on this website should be decided when someone votes

I am quite disappointed in my opponent. I was expecting that whoever would actually accept this debate would be a bit more challenging, considering the difficulty of going against such a great idea. REBUTTALS: "I have done multiple researches by looking through comments!" Perhaps you have, however there is no proof that you did in either of your arguments proving that you did. I will now quote both of your argument. Round 1 argument: "I think that it is a good thing there are time limits. If there is more time the person or people who created and argues this topic may get anxious. Also, if it is a class project, you would probably need to know sooner! Imagine if you had to wait 20 days for someone to vote and your teacher got you in trouble, when it wasn't even you! This is my opinion and even though you have stated your facts clearly and presentably I think my case is quite stronger and well educated as research has proven my opinions and ideas. You may now rebuttal." Round 2 argument: "I have done multiple researches by looking through comments! I also have been asked to use debate.org for MULTIPLE class projects as an AP student. Yes you do get anxious and for me that is a bad thing. I think worrying causes a lot of unneeded stress. I think a shorter time will also encourage people to make more friends and tell other friends about debate.org which is a lot of good business for debate.org." You have no proof in either of your arguments proving your research. I could do the same. For example, I could say that "89.6% of users on this website agree with my idea, I obtained this data through research." But there would be no proof I researched, just because I did, doesn't mean I really did. "I also have been asked to use debate.org for MULTIPLE class projects as an AP student. " I find this very doubtful. First of all, your account only has 2 debates on this, not making it worthy of writing multiple in full caps. [1] Secondly, if you were really an AP student, you would be superior to others on this site, because AP means advanced placement if I'm wrong. And if you look at your account, you lost the only debate you finished. Also, your debating is pretty weak. Mine is to, but still superior to your style, and yet, I am but a child. So you, the so called AP student, just got told by a child :D "Yes you do get anxious and for me that is a bad thing." Well let us assume that you indeed to get anxious, this is subjective. Just because you get anxious doesn't mean i would be anxious. And if you were to wait with anxiety, and the debate ended in a tie, would it really be better than waiting a bit longer to find the real winner? At least this way, being anxious would be worth it. "I think a shorter time will also encourage people to make more friends and tell other friends about debate.org which is a lot of good business for debate.org." How, on this big blue marble, stuck in this void of shadows and nothingness we call earth is that possible? How is it that with a smaller voting period people make friends? Do you realize how odd that sounds? The reason some people don't get votes is because they don't have friends on this website, so if no one pays attention, then they won't make friends. And how will shorter time periods make people encourage their friends to join? This argument makes no sense what so ever. ARGUMENTS: In this following round, I will explain 1 more argument, interest Some debates are voted by the interesting topic. If the topic is boring, or maybe to advanced, people can't understand, and thus the lack of care takes place. Why vote for a topic that is boring or difficult to comprehend? Well that's the thing, some people may have an interest in the topic, however they are not always on. If the voting period goes past the time limit, even if this voter comes late, he can still vote and basically, decide the winner. I thank the viewers and voters for reading this debate, and I hope you vote. And if you do vote, please vote pro. Pro has demonstrated sources, and ACTUAL research. Thus making his arguments and rebuttals superior to cons. source: http://www.debate.org...