Resolved: The Christian God Most Likely Doesn't Exist

Response to your first defense- You did say that extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence. Whether you are going to admit it or not, claiming there isn't a God (or most likely as you put it, but i'm not supposed to be nit picky), is a pretty extraordinary claim. Rather than this being be a defense on your part, We shall count this as a consession, therefore no more defense on my part is needed. Response to your second defense- I stated twice that it is impossible to refute someone's personal experience without resorting to attacks. Which I was right and in this defense you appear to not make any attacks, which I commend you for. But wait.... you call it a mental mishap or an outright lie. I was right! you cannot infact refute this without resorting to attacks. I would ask you how you believe these things did not happen, however you stated that it was a mental mishap or a lie. Who are you to contend with these claims? You were not there. You did not experience these things. So what mental mishap was it? what happened to cause these delussions? Until you can come up with a finite answer to what caused this, we shall consider this defense a concession of my argument as well Response to your thrid defense- You simply did not answer the question I posed to you. My response was why would God or why should God. Seeing as you did not even attempt to answer, we shall consider this defense you made a concession as well That's three concessions my opp has made I may concede the ark claim, I may not. I probably wont. But you never even attempted to refute the my argument on the dead sea scrolls. This shall count as your 4th concession Biblical scholars and theologians have for years agreed that creation did not happen in days as we ourselves consider days. What "days" means is not literally Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday. These people believe that "days" was actually, hundreds, thousands, millions, billions of years. Some people believe the universe is only 6,000 years old. My question of "What happened next" or "what caused the Big Bang" has still gone unanswered. There HAS to be something in motion making these things to happen. Something HAD to cause the Big Bang. And something HAD to cause that. And so on and so forth. My opp cannot (again) come up with an explaination. This is his 5th concession. My opp finalized this arguement that the lifeforms in the universe are not perfect. I'd agree but He presented no evidence as to why we are scientifically prone to malfunctions. I have evidence. Genesis 3:1-19 http://www.biblegateway.com... Even though this was in the same refutation as the 5th concession, we shall, for good measure, count this as my opps 6th concession Since I am not yet willing to concede my opps claim about the ark, I will concede that the interveiw I was talking about with Ben Stein and Richard Dawkins where Dawkins claimed bactaria on the back of crystals, was not actually Dawkins. It was some other prominent British atheist who's name escapes me right now. However there IS an interveiw Stein conducted with Dawkins, in which Dawkins admitted he did not know exactly how the universe was created but was certain it was not by God. http://www.youtube.com... Since this was not a serious infraction on my part, as I was partially right, We will count this as a 1/4 concession on my part So folks, as you see, My opponent has made six (five if he is able to come with a finite answer to what caused people to have delusions of God) to my 1/4 of a concession. It's a really simple debate and my opp has helped prove my points more than he knows.