Relativity Is Wrong

In opposition to your structure, I would like to begin by rebutting then making my points. You start off your first point by saying that Albert Einstein proposed three classical tests of relativity and if disproven the theory would be proved wrong. However Michio Kaku another mainstream scientist who actually worships Einstein says otherwise. “If any theory, even relativity fails under one test then the theory is WRONG” -Michio Kaku (The Universe In A Nutshell) However I will still go on and give you a simple explanation on why Einstein’s eclipse experiment actually happened without the consequences of relativity. Gravity IS electromagnetic (you will see how later on) and so is LIGHT. When light, passes an object with big mass such as the sun, it gets attracted due to gravity but so does the star or planet. However it’s a very small amount. This happens because light, being electromagnetic (which is the source of gravity) has very small mass and that’s why it attracts the object by a very small amount. However the star on the other hand has a much bigger mass and that’s why it gravitational attraction is larger. I should also point out that my opponent ADMITS to the uncertainty of time being either a phenomena or merely a tool to describe motion. He does this in the following passage: “In addition, you have to prove relativity wrong. Being unable to prove something exists does not mean it doesn't exist, as one such case being god. But this is not a religious debate, this is a scientific debate. I was only giving an example where BoP didn't have to be presented. It must be noted that I actually provided solid evidence for relativity.” My opponent is implying that you don’t need any EVIDENCE to say that time is a phenomena in nature and should base our understanding on physics on something that may not exist. You also said that I failed to prove the first experiment even though I mentioned it failed due to the electromagnetic influence, which not surprisingly was the cause of both failures. This brings me on to my next point: Gravity In the paper UDT By Abdulsalam Al-Mayahi he describes gravity perfectly. “Gravity between any two objects is an attraction Force due to the pull interaction between both the electric and magnetic fields of at least two objects, and this Force is normally perpendicular to both fields.” Note: This DOES follow the inverse square law. The space-time model for gravity has no proof whatsoever to back it up and is not sufficient enough for our understanding of gravity. The main problem with modern day physics is that most experiments are being performed on earth which has a high electromagnetic field which affects the result. Experiments include testing the speed of light and many more which is included in Abdulsalam’s paper. The proof lies in the paper itself but it has too many characters to be posted onto this debate. So I will link the pages that should give you a better understanding at the end of my argument. I would like to end my argument with a quote from the paper: “At the present time, physicists experience a number of problems. In physics, a “Field” refers to a region which is affected by a Force, such as electricity, magnetism or gravity. As you know, the brilliant Scottish mathematician and theoretical scientist James Clerk Maxwell wrote in 1861, ["On physical lines of force”], (Maxwell, 1861) and in 1865 [“A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field”] (Maxwell, 1865). Oliver Heaviside reformulated these equations and they were then confirmed by Heinrich Hertz in 1887 (Hertz,1887). To a certain extent, Maxwell equations can describe almost every aspect of electromagnetism and that was the First “Field Theory”. Albert Einstein's “General Theory of Relativity”, which deals with gravity, became the Second “Field Theory” (although it has not yet been verified). Einstein failed to prove that electromagnetism and gravity were different aspects of a single fundamental field. This issue got even cloudier when Quantum Theory became involved, as it made everything more complicated without actually solving many serious issues. In contrast, my UDT allows the exact speed of light in a zero-Gravitational field to be determined, and what I call the “Maxwell Speed of Light“, can be measured and verified experimentally using many different methods.” Sources: Michio Kaku – The universe in a nutshell: UDT – GRAVITY: http://www.scribd.com... UDT – PROOF OF ELECTROMAGNETISM BEING THE ONLY FORCE IN NATURE (WORK DOWNWARDS): http://www.scribd.com... UDT – GRAVITATIONAL DIAGRAM OF THE EARTH: http://gyazo.com...