Resolved: Mikal's Fiance Marina Is Possibly GodChoosesLife

Let it begin, para bellum! Before anything let me start with tackling that so obviously photo-shopped, horribly cropped photo of Marie/Marina. It makes absolutely no sense, and is against the fundamental laws of science. Remember while this debate may feature troll arguments, they do have to be logical. Here is a friend of mine, who is actually Martian. He accuses you of being illegitemate in your claim and so obviously wrong. This is what a Martian looks like, make no mistake. Do you get it now? Does Marie/Marina look anything like this? The answer is NO!Burden of Proof Analysis:Do not fall for my opponent's trickery. Remember even troll debates need a logical structure. Here it is then. The resolution says: Mikal's Fiance Marina Is Possibly GodChoosesLife, a.k.a Marie. Now I only have to show (in Modal Logic) possibly P, while my opponent needs to show not possibly P which is the same as necessarily not P[1]. Hahahahah my opponent is already trolled because while I need only show that Marie could (in any possible universe, as assumed by Set Theory) be Marina, he needs to show Marie is necessarily not Marina. Serious Arguments + Troll Arguments = Win!:1. Frankell-Zermello Set Theory, the Multiverse, and Parallel Universes:Now you may wonder why I believe Marine may possibly be Marie. Well my first argument is a serious one. In 1874 it was shown that with the help of the Golden Ratio one may at any time do anything. In fact there are millions, even infinite paralled universes at any time. Now in many of these Parallel Universes Marie is Marina because that is something which the mind can concieve. Now Quantum Theory shows that Time is a upsy downy thing which travels in the way humans make decisions. So while it may seem improbable, if from today certain actions are done we will be in a universe where Marina is Marie. Therefore Marina call possibly be Marie.[2][3][4][5] Now this you may say applies to Marina not being Marie also, and it does, in certain dimensions. But remember our dimension constantly shifts in accordanace to the decisions made. So Marina can infact be Marie, there is a POSSIBILITY and this is Mathematically proven in the sources I have cited. 2. Mikal has never seen them both, and there is no evidence of them both being seen at the same time; voice softwares could be used; split personality disorder; fried chicken is awesome!Now there are two tiers to this argument. The first that no one has seen them both at the same time, and I they do look a little similar. The second is that everything can be described by fried chicken. If you like fried chicken, I am right. This also applies as fried Tofu #VeganLoveLet me start of by showing you the sworn testimony of Mikal: Now Marie and Marina have never been seen together in all this time, does this not make you suspicious? The reason is that Marie is Marine, deal with it. Or at the very least there is a POSSIBILITY that Marie is Marina. Mikal has never seent them both together. I mean they even look similar, and the umm personality difference can be shown by the fact that this person has a split personality disorder. So really do you think there is NO POSSIBILITY that Marie is Marina. There is possibility I win. Secondly if fried food is awesome Marie could be Marina, Fried food is awesome, Marie could be Marine. So HA!3. They have a similar name, I mean they dont even try:You have to be a special kind of stupid not to see that Marie sounds so much like Marina. I mean did they even try? All you have to do is add a -na and it becomes Marina, from Marie. Now nah means no, and obviously Marie has to say no when she is with Mikal, so she added it in her name. Marie=Marina or at the very least THERE IS A POSSIBILITY. [1]http://en.wikipedia.org...(modal_logic)[2]http://logic.harvard.edu...[3]http://en.wikipedia.org...[4]http://www.gauge-institute.org...[5]http://space.mit.edu...So you see my friend there is very much a possibility, not only through thr troll of fried chicken and names, but through the mathematical analysis and proofs of set theory. SET THORY FTW!!!I humbly ask Krit to concede. Faithfully Yours, Ajab.