The US "moon landing" was fake

Thank you for accepting and clarifying some terms.Now, let's begin.I will start by pointing out some basic, illogical details from the photographic evidence.1) In the photograph below, you will notice that there is something dark being reflected from the top of the astronaut's visor. Either there was an object was flying in mid-air on the moon (there wasn't), or this is some part of stage equipment. (Maybe a stage light). Sorry for the enormous photo.2) In the photo below, you can see the moon rover while it's still un-assembled (the big white package). If it's wrapped up, then how could there already be tracks from the moon rover? 3) We've established that the moon rover should leave definite tracks. If the astronaut alone makes obvious tracks, then his weight along with the weight of the moon rover should leave a trail. If so, then why are there no tracks in front of or behind the wheel of the moon rover? Maybe because it was lowered by a crane? 4) The sheer number of photos is also suspcious. If you subtract the time spent on other activities (such as establishing communications and collecting rock samples) the result is that there was one photo taken every 15 SECONDS! Also note that all of the photos are perfectly framed. How could the astronauts take so many accurate photos? Especially considering that the camera was on their chest. They cannot bend their heads down to look, they must aim by turning their chest and guessing. It is impossible that the astronauts could produce so many high quality photos under such conditions.http://en.wikipedia.org...http://www.lpi.usra.edu...5) There is yet another obvious inconsistency. The video below is the footage of the Eagle coming in for the moon landing. (Start the video at about 12:00)It is easy to see the very large amount of dust that is being kicked up by the engine, yet once the Eagle lands, there is not a speck of dust/dirt on it.http://www.esa.int... <6) Taking a look at the same picture of the Eagle (above), there is no evidence of any disturbance on the surface of the moon. As mentioned, after having kicked up so much dust, it should be much messier. There is also no crater or evidence of the blasts from the engine and impact of the LEM onto the moon's surface.http://www.esa.int...7) Another blaring inconsistency. As mentioned, in the video of the Eagle coming in for a landing, most (if not all) dust is being blasted away, revealing only harder stone underneath. If so, how could there be such obvious footprints right by the LEM? On the right side of the picture, it looks as if the dust is an inch deep in certain areas! This is impossible! A simple leaf-blower would be capable of removing most of the dust, but we have the engine of a spacecraft that wasn't capable of blowing it away? Also remember that the moon's gravity is only 1/6 that of the Earth, which means that the astronauts would weigh six times less on the moon. Taking this into account, it is even more absurd that the astronauts left such deep footprints.http://www.moonconnection.com... 8) Also think about this. The moon has no wind, and no flowing water on the surface. That means that there is minimal erosion and that most of the rock should be in one piece, not fine dust. This is completely inconsistent with the massive amounts of moon dust/sand that is in the pictures and videos of Apollo 11. http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov...Such an incredible amount of inconsistencies leads me to think that it is reasonable to believe that the Apollo 11 mission was faked.I await my opponent's response.