Islamic Scripture is from God

I thank my rival once again.And I ask my dear opponent whether the verse said 'horses' or 'wild horses'. It clearly said 'horses', did it not?And even if it said 'wild horses' it would not be illogic. A wild horse can become a domesticated horse, and the Koran does not say in this verse that he did everything that is neccesary to ride the horse and that we have no more work with it. It said that He created them for the purpose of riding and show, but not that we did not have to work for it...Furthermore, if a foal is kept in captivity and domestication from the very beginning of his life, he does not become wild in the least. It gets used to its living situation and bows itself to it. Is this horse then not a creation?I hope my opponent will leave this horse topic now, for no more arguing is possible for a healthy mind after reading this clear answer...Then, my honourable rival, I did not intend to insult you at all. Please do not feel offended.But I just suprised myself over the fact that you could not see the difference between two very clear opposites: heavens and earth...And as you said, it is most of theories that say that. And it remains a theory, that can always change after science advances.If we can follow the multiverse theory that says there is not an infinite but a great and almost incountable number of universes outside our own, this universe is our closest heaven.Unless of course, what would not quite suprise me, there are also stars in the entire multiverse, which would mean that even the multiverse is no more but part of the closest heaven...Moreover, I believe my opponent has missed a piece of my previous argument. I said that something is 'imperfect' when something occures that is not meant to happen with it. If God deliberatly forms a man thus with only one arm or leg, blind, deaf, or some other 'faults', these are not really faults, because God intended so. He wanted the man to have just one arm or leg, to be blind or deaf, etc.And Allah does not think, Allah knows. If He intends to make something happen, it happens perfectly according to his plan. It is not the form that is perfect (which would point to the adjective my rival rejected) but the plan according to which God made the human beings. (which is more like a verb, do you not think?)Now, I know for sure this instant that my rival has not the knowledge on Islam he seemes to have.THE HADITHS ARE NOT FROM GOD BUT FROM THE PROPHET MOHAMMED.And the reason we have got them today in our hands, is from hearsay. The Prophet said something, people heard it. After the Prophet's death, people started quoting him and writing his words down. These quotes are not always truthful. The knowledge in it came from God, but past trough the lips of Mohammed (peace be upon him) who was only human, not divine, and then past trough the ears and mouths of his followers. There might be here and there something wrong, so if you would stay to the topic.We are arguing about the divinity of the Koran, NOT THE HADITHS.My opponent has now flew over the topic of this thing with God's son. I gave clear arguments. If my opponent's brain cannot process clear arguments, that is no matter. As long as you, voters, are clever enough, there is no matter...And furthermore, I simply gave my opinion on the false chapters my opponent gave me to read. I underlined the most important sentence of my argument and still, my rival uses my opinion to manipulate the minds of the voters.My opponent yet proved he can read. Read this then: And any true Arabic poet, Muslim or non-Muslim cannot deny none of this work is better than that of the Koran.I now give my rival another chance to give real and undenyable arguments. I hope for him and his dignity in my eyes he will either succeed or give up the debate...