BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The Jews were no less popular in Germany than they were in other European countries in 1939

The 'pro' side of this debate seeks to limit the discussion to only include nations thought to be in his camp. Why is this when it is easy to prove that the government of the Soviet Union in the years leading up to and including 1939 was not anti-Jewish in and of itself? The answer to this question can be found in the 'pro' side stipulation that the Jewish people cannot be separated from the Jewish religion. Because that is exactly what the Soviets sought to do. Just like the Western European Christian nations, Soviet atheism wanted to separate the Jews from Judaism. Not until there is a separation can there be assimilation. The problem of assimilation of the Jewish people into Christian Europe is a paradigm where those who would have had assimilation only saw their efforts thwarted by an 'unseen hand'.
November Fun Facts

November Word Art - Dixie Allan Photo Credit: Dixie Allan November is the 11th month of the year and one of four months with a length of 30 days. November was the ninth month of the ancient Roman calendar and has retained its name from the Latin novem meaning nine. Topaz is one of the birthstones for November. Topaz is found in many colors, but it is the orange-yellow topaz that is the traditional birthstone for November. Topaz is a symbol of friendship. Citrine is also a November birthstone. Ads Start Download www.fromdoctopdf.com Convert Any File to a PDF. Get The Free FromDoctoPdf Toolbar! Convert Images For Free www.myimageconverter.com My Image Converter Makes Converting Images Simple, Easy & It's Free! Download Free Forex eBook markettraders.com/forex-book/ 10 Keys to Successful Forex Trading by Jared Martinez aka the FX Chief Clipart Thanksgiving Images for Thanksgiving Autumn Leaves Clipart Fall Leaf Clipart Printable Clipart Citrine is actually a quartz crystal and is yellow to orange in color. It is often mistaken for the orange-yellow topaz which is the more expensive of the two birthstones. The flower for the month of November is the chrysanthemum. The word chrysanthemum comes from the Greek words chrys and anthemum. Chrys means golden, the original color of the chrysanthemum, and anthemum means flower. The symbols of the chrysanthemum are optimism and joy. Scorpio and Sagittarius are the astrological signs for November. Birthdays from November 1st through the 21st fall under the Scorpio sign. November 22nd through November 30th birthdays fall under the sign of Sagittarius. In the United States and Canada, November is National Beard Month or No Shave Month. Australians have a similar month were they grow a mustache instead of a full beard. In Finland they call November 'marraskuu' which translates as month of the dead. The Erie Canal was formally opened at New York on November 4, 1825. Lincoln"s Gettysburg address was given in November, 1863. R32; Parker Brothers introduced the world to the Monopoly game on November 5, 1935. The US and Canada celebrate the end of WWI every year on November 11. The first mechanically ventilated underwater tunnel in the world, The Holland Tunnel, opened to traffic on November 13, 1927. The Suez Canal opened, November 17, 1869. United States and Panama signed the treaty that provided for the Panama Canal on November 18, 1903. On November 18, 1963 Bell Telephone Company introduced to the public the push button phone. John F. Kennedy was assassinated on November 22 1963. French painter Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec born on November 24, 1864. After discovering debris-covered stairs, British archaeologist Howard Carter and his crew entered the four-room Egyptian tomb of 18-year-old King Tutankhamen on November 26, 1922. Commander Richard E. Byrd and crew of three became first to fly over South Pole, November 29, 1929. Jonathan Swift, author of Gulliver's Travels, was born November 30, 1667. Mark Twain, American author, was born November 30, 1835. British statesman Sir Winston Churchill was born November 30, 1874. http://webclipart.about.com...
November Fun Facts

Hi everybody!This is a literal fun fact debate - only its themed with a Thanksgiving Theme!Put up a bunch of really good fun facts about Thanksgiving. And you!Voters!Choose one person who has the weirdest and most "out-of-the-way" fun facts wins!Rules:DO NOT put up anything inappropriate! This involves stuff about sex and swearing. However, death is an OK topic.Do not put up a fun fact up in round 1. That will be for the following round.One fun fact per round please!Please cite your sources.All facts have to go with the theme somehow.Thank you! breakingamber.
Net Neutrality

I see your point, but I do not believe that the internet should be controlled by a few company's. Second, ISPs are not producers they are providers, greedy ones at that. Your packages idea is a bad one in my opinion, because of the fact that internet would be more expensive than it already is. The internet should always be a place where ideas shall live or die based on their popularity, not by what a company thinks. BTW thanks for being a respectful person to debate with December 17th 2017 4:02 PM
Net Neutrality

I'd posit that perhaps such a majority of Americans are only serviced by one internet provider simply because there is no reason for another company to move in. If that company should begin to deny access to certain websites, and there is a substantial demand for said websites, I think this would cause more diversity in providers. A crucial part of my argument, however, I think has gone unaddressed by you. Even given that there is a true monopoly, and there are people who are unable to get access to some number of websites, I do not see that as a crime. If that company were not there, those people would be without internet access anyhow. Access to any--let alone every--website on the internet is a service, it is not a right; therefore to be denied it is not in anyway a crime. I think you overlooked this in your response. I'd also like to suggest some possible advantages to not enforcing Net Neutrality. If companies are allowed to select which websites they provide access to, they can craft internet packages more tailored to specific consumers. For example, they can produce a childrens' package, with access to only kid-friendly websites, or a cheaper business package, with only access to an employee's company websites. Liberals can sell packages with only liberal websites, conservatives packages with only conservative websites. I think that a producer has the right to determine exactly what sort of product he produces, and to what sort of customer he provides it to.
Net Neutrality

It's the free market. If Comcast is trying to push their alternative product to Netflix: Watchcast, and they decide to not provide Netflix in order to do this, they present the consumer with a choice; either the consumer values the price that Comcast is asking, or they value the product that Comcast is neglecting to provide. If one producer refuses to provide a certain product to consumers, that only provides incentive for rival companies to provide said product to the consumers. With regards to those consumers with access only to one internet service provider: an axiom of economics is that in any economy, if the demand for a certain product is high enough, that product will be supplied, if not restricted in any way by union or federal laws. If those Americans value Netflix highly enough, they will be willing to pay enough to provide incentive for a rival internet service provider to move in. If through some extraneous circumstances, there is no way for some families to have Netflix, that is not an injustice. Man has no natural right to entertainment; there is no injustice simply because you can't watch season two of Stranger Things. There is an injustice, however, in stripping the producer of his right to determine what products he produces, and to whom he provides them.
Net Neutrality

CONTRA MINEO, Thanks for the topic, my first argument is very brief. The service of providing internet access is a private service just like any other, and as such, the service provider has the right to determine exactly what sort of product he wishes to provide. The internet service company provides two services: one to the consumer, the one viewing websites, and one to the producer, the owner of a given website. Any private service provider reserves the right to deny service to whomever he should wish, for any reason. Therefore, an internet service provider may deny service to any website.
Net Neutrality

The Net Neutrality Act has nothing to do with how many companies the internet access is provided by. It does only accidentally, in that by allowing companies some variance in what websites they provide access to, you allow for some diversity in product, and therefore more tailoring and competition. The ISPs are producers, in that their product is a service. Just as the milkman produces a milk carton that is on your doorstep, ISPs produce websites that are accessible by you. It's interesting that you think specific internet packages would cause internet on the whole to become more expensive, I am imagining limited packages being provided for prices lower than the full internet is currently being provided for.
Rap Battle - Come Hard With Your Bars Part II

You have lost the battle by default, since you broke rule number 1https://www.urbaniacs.com...That's where the lines: You losers think u can rap, but really, i used your raps to wipe after my last crap. Your rhymes are a disgrace to the whole human race, if this was race you would be in last place, and oh yeah, you wouldn't know a good rhyme, if it slapped you in the face. I think its funny, how yall think you got game, when really what you got is straight up lame. If i were you, i would be ashamed to tell anyone my first name. were stolen from. I'll still rap thoughJedi you're a biter, you steal other peoples linesI'm exposing you out loud, and hitting you like a prize fighter, i'll make whatever original rhymes you wrote minenow let's repeat it one more time, biting is like purposefully stepping on a landmine3 battles slaughtered now, better prepare the shrinewitnessing a bloody murder like you were watching datelinei heard through the grapevine that you've got a weak mindyou're the living proof against intelligent designjust like with NC you're being too benignslam you like Brock Lesnar and dislocate your whole entire spineyour approach to this battle is more crooked than your hairlineyour nerve to steal has me borderline ready to batter you and spatter your blood on the rock walls like My Bloody Valentinefirst verse and i've already slung more shots than Columbineit's nowhere near over i'm blowing you up like a crazy motherf-cker from Palestine
Rap Battle - Come Hard With Your Bars Part II

You losers think u can rap, but really, i used your raps to wipe after my last crap. Your rhymes are a disgrace to the whole human race, if this was race you would be in last place, and oh yeah, you wouldn't know a good rhyme, if it slapped you in the face. I think its funny, how yall think you got game, when really what you got is straight up lame. If i were you, i would be ashamed to tell anyone my first name. It looks like there is a new man on the street but looks like he don't know the man running this beat so let me rise this flame with my lyrical heat my name is no importance to the man i am facing if the rap game was running I don't even need racing cuz i can beat any sucker without even pacing got it so easy like them shoes i am lacing just one thing just try not to be offended especially if i caught you off guard consider yourself rear-ended if you're winning then don't even consider cuz i make them girls follow me like as if i was twitter I hear you talkin' sh*t, bro you think you're the heat Please bow down to defeat you're barely mince meat Stop with the street talk, and start to do the street, walk Lock yourself in and tell me this, how you gonna battle with this sick sh*t that I spit b*tch See you still flappin' your jaws, prepare to be thrown in the ocean In the middle with jaws Or prefer to be served and severed with claws, knock on the doors Of absolute death you may But please be ready for the automatic failures you may make So take this and wait for another dismembering, remembering The tethering of your dream and how it was minced to pieces
Rap Battle - Come Hard With Your Bars Part II

Rap Battle, Come hard with the barsProudly Presenting Part II in The Ever-Expanding Series!Rules:1. No stealing from other artists2. Should be judged on wordplay and rhyme schemes/word choice3. Be RuthlessGood luck! Anyone willing to step up to the challenge can Message me privately or comment on this debate and we can get a part III going immediately.Start your bars in your round 1 argument
Gay Marriage

Gay marriage should be legal in all countries worldwide. The subject is often debated, but why debate? What about gay marriage is even malicious in any form? There is freedom of religion. There is freedom all around. Marijuana, tobacco, alcohol: all legal, but accompanied by horrible repercussions. Smoking affects people around the one doing so, but gay marriage? What horrible repercussions does gay marriage carry? None. The people affected by a gay marriage only become uncomfortable. If one is concerned with their religion disapproving, they are not sinning simply by witnessing a happily married gay couple. Why should gay marriage be illegal? What negative affects could it possibly have?
Ron Paul should get the Republican nomination. He is the only candidate who follows the constitution

Dr. Ron Paul is the only candidate who has staunchly defended the constitution throughout his career. Most republicans won't vote for him because of his stand on the Iraq War. George Washington said that we should avoid entangling alliances and that is exactly what we've got ourselves into with this war. 9/11 would have never happened if our borders were secure. There are experienced border agents who are being offered huge salaries to leave their jobs guarding American soil to go to Iraq and guard the borders over there. How is that keeping us safe? I think that we should withdraw our troops and start using them to defend our borders. I think that we should follow the advice of the founding fathers. That advice has led this nation and helped it become the most powerful country in world history.
Choose a public forum topic.

Read before accepting. Failure to adhere to these rules results in a complete forfeit, with 7 points being awarded to the con side.I'm interested in doing a debate on any topic which I have debated before. I ask that my opponent choose the topic, and begin arguing in the next round. Regardless of which topic is chosen, I will be con. Below is the list of topics, from the National Forensic League (slightly edited for clarity), that I have debated. Pro must choose one, and only one, of these topics.Resolved: Direct popular vote should replace electoral vote in presidential elections.Resolved: On balance, current income disparities in the United States threaten democratic ideals.Resolved: In the United States, the costs of a college education outweigh the benefits.Resolved: Birthright citizenship should be abolished in the United States.Resolved: The United States should suspend all assistance to Pakistan.Resolved: The United States should prioritize tax increases over spending cuts.Resolved: On balance, the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission harms the election process.Resolved: On balance, the rise of China is beneficial to the interests of the United States.Rules (similar to public forum)Neither side may present a plan. As such, "We should reform the immigration system in X way rather than abolishing birthright citizenship," "We should suspend aid to Pakistan, and then implement X, Y, and Z before giving it back," or anything along those lines is not allowed.Pro must argue first, presenting the choice of topic and supporting arguments in round 1. To make sure rounds remain even, pro will not post anything pertaining to the debate in round 4. Definitions are open for debate.No semantics, lawyering, trolling, etc.No new arguments in the final round.The rules/topics I set up are fairly specific, but you can post in the comments if you are interested in debating without certain rules.
Oneness Pentecostalism

My response to the assumed positions: "1. I am assuming the King James Bible will be the only Bible we will count as a reliable source for this debate. And the ONLY reliable source for this debate." My position is that only the original Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic is completely valid. All translations have errors. I will use the KJV as my main translation and basis of argument, but other translations must be used in order to confirm through a third party the literal translation of the Greek, Hebrew or Aramaic. "2. For this debate we agree that God does exist and is fact for this debate." Yes "3. From the resolution in this round we gather that the Father and Son is one and the same person. And through the mind of the human Christ, Father God (Spirit) reveals his will to man." Yes "All things known by Christ are known by the Father (Spirit) and vice versus." No. The human mind of the man Christ Jesus has human limitations and cannot know the omniscience of the eternal Spirit of God. While experiencing an existence from within a human mind, the Spirit of God exterior to the man Christ Jesus taught Him as God teaches all men. "And from the three different doctrines we have also learned that Pro adheres to the first doctrine of oneness, Orthodox. And being that Pro believes Orthodox and not Neotisoriansin or Sabellianism the beliefs associated with these two doctrines are not fact in this debate. Please specify that Christ either has a separate conscience from God or that the two consciousness are different but with all knowledge of Heaven and of God. This seems contradictory when you read the statement below." The one person God simultaneously existed in two consciousnesses—human and Divine. The one person of God is the source of both; the Divine consciousness is omniscient, immutable, timeless and cannot change; the human consciousness is based upon a human language that the man Christ Jesus learned from a child and stored chemically inside of his human brain, as any man. Inside of this human mind, the eternal God live a genuine human life, with a separate, human will. I have these questions for you: (1) Do you consider yourself trinitarian or arian? (2) Was the Son call "Son" in heaven? (3) Did God take upon Himself human limitations in Christ? Or did Michael the Archangel if you are arian? (4) What did the Hebrews use the term "Word" or "Memra" for in the Targums? (5) Did ancient Jews and Greeks believe that heaven was the timeless beginning and ending of all things?
Oneness Pentecostalism

The Bible teaches that God the Father is an immutable Spirit that dwells in heaven, the Son of God is this same God in a lesser, human form, and the Holy Spirit is the "wind" or "breath" of this self same God. There are no divine personalities within God. God is personally one, although He is a person far beyond the human definition of the word, because He is timeless. Jesus is the one person God of Israel manifested through human flesh. Since God is Spirit, he can dwell many places at the same time. He dwelt in heaven in an omnipotent, omniscient, and timeless state of being--while at the same time--he dwelt in the man Christ Jesus on this earth, within time. As God is billions upon billions of times greater than man, the distinction between God as an omnipotent Spirit and God in the Son of Man or Son of God is the same. Inside of the man Christ Jesus, God perceived everything from within a human mind. The incarnation caused the eternal God to exist in two different consciousnesses. He continued to exist in an omniscient consciousness in heaven, while he also existed within a human consciousness on earth. There are not two or three conscious persons in God, but rather the one personal God exists in two consciousnesses--human and divine. After the resurrection, the Son of Man's physical body was changed. He then ascended outside of this universe into the one timeless "age" of the Almighty God called the "Olam Habba" in Judaism and the "Aperion" among the Greeks. God and heaven were known to be the immutable beginning and ending of time and space. It is in this timeless, eternally pre-existent place that the Son of Man--God existing the lesser form of a man--is our High Priest. Therefore, God and Christ are two distinct beings, but not two distinct persons. The Son of David ascended into the immutably pre-existent God, who is Spirit. This real distinction was reinterpreted by the second century Church Fathers as bitarianism, which later led to the formation of the trinity. There are three forms of Oneness: (1) Orthodox. This is what I believe. There is a real distinction between the Father and Son brought about by the incarnation. (2) Neotisorianism. This is what most Oneness Pentecostals believe today. This divides Christ's two natures into almost two persons, where "sometimes he speaks as a man, and sometimes as God." I reject this view. (3) Sabellianism. This view purports that God changed from the Father to the Son, and from the Son to the Holy Spirit. I reject this view, and it is defunct.
Islam is a Peaceful Religion

There are more than a few terrorist attacks. The biggest would be September 11, 2001. I will leave a link below showing all Islamic terrorist attacks dating back to the 1980s. There was a video showing an Islamic rally where a Muslim stood at a podium surveying a group of at least one hundred Muslims whether women were less than men and should be separated. They all agreed. He then goes on to ask if women should be stoned for infidelity. They all agreed. Finally, he asks if homosexuals should be hanged. Again, they all agreed. Now, it's not that the religion itself is violent. Those were not the original intentions of Allah and his prophet Muhammad. It is the followers and leaders that are taking it into their own hands and trying to control other nations forcing Jewish, Catholic, etc. nations to become Muslim. They posed as Syrian refugees to march into England and take over England. They forced England to take down their flag saying that it offended them. They chanted to convert England to Islam. They said that were going to breed with their women and convert England to Islam. They act like animals, raiding the streets of Cologne, Germany, smashing car windows, setting businesses afire, raping women and children as young as seven years old. This is not a peaceful religion that presently believes in warfare in order to gain followers. They should not be allowed into countries seeking refuge. Now I will not start a political debate on immigration policies with you. The vast majority of Muslims will fire a gun or bomb a building so they can conquer a nation to convert them to Islam. https://en.wikipedia.org...