Nicean Trinity against Socinus' Trinity

Adonai Not Equivalent to YahwehI agree that Yahweh is not equivalent to Adonai but Yawheh also, not just the Messiah, is called "Adonai":I say to the LORD, "You are Adonai; apart from you I have no good thing." Psalm 16:2 The Wisdom of GodI totally believe that the wisdom of God in Proverbs 8 is a personification of wisdom but that changed as I came to know Christ in the New Testament. I found out that Wisdom is not just personified but is a real person indeed. The Son is the Wisdom of the Father per se means that God doesn't need experiential knowledge to make sensible decisions and judgments in a situation because he could make all sensible decisions and judgments in all his activities via his Son ( Luke 11:49-Matt. 23:24, 1 Cor. 1:24-Col. 1:16-17, Heb. 1:3-Wisdom 7:25,26). Both Jesus' claims of Divinity and of Sophiology ensues his Apostles to identify him as the Divine Wisdom in the flesh. The personified attribute in the Old Testament Scriptures had began to be understood as a real person in the New Testament.This fact remains strict monotheism despite of plurality of person within the Jewish Deity. Revelation 3:14 'The source* of God's creation" This shows that the Son is the Creator not a creature.* Greek arche. The Father is also called "arche" also in Revelation 21:6 and this definitely doesn't mean the Father has an "origin".Colossians 1:15 is genitive of subodination while Romans 8:29 is genitive of partitive. It is the immediate context that determines what sort of genitive is in a clause/sentence. The wider context ALSO highly refutes my opponent's stance on Col. 1:15's prototokos as partitive because Christ as Sophia was said to be the Creator (Hebrews 1:2-3,10, Col. 1:16, Proverbs 8:22 LXX) and Christ as the Logos is said to be the Creator also(John 1:3).To be the Logos of God is to be God in nature as John 1:1 and 18 puts it.John 5:26 The Father has " life in himself" and this very same life he gave to his own Son. Therefore, the Son has "life in himself". How was this life given to the Son? Well, the answer is in the text per se, it is by virtue of their relationship as "Father" and "Son". We read that in John 1:18, the Logos is "the only-offspring who is God in nature" ( Greek: monogenes theos). My opponent should not take it literally as if the Father handed over a book/ a plate of pasta etc. to his Son. No. The verse is to be taken in its language form. John 5:26 strongly supports the Nicean exegesis.I could say that my Parents gave me life like theirs and it means that I am human in nature, flesh and blood.On the ortherhand, Christ himself said that the Father gave him the very same life he has and it means that Christ is God in nature, eternal and almighty. That is, One who is conceived and birthed by someone is a son,of same nature (Greek: homoousios) with the parent and one who is before creation is eternal. The genetic anthropomorphism of "birthed" only denotes " homoousiousness " of the Father and the Son just as one who is born of a human parent is human.The TrinityYou make assertations you cannot prove. The Trinity did not evovled. The church always believe in the Trinity as one God just as I already explicated clearly in Round #2. The Nicene Creed focused on the divinity of the Son because it was in attack by Arius the Heresiarch. Heresies arises and it must be contended against as commanded in Jude 1:3. Show me historical proof that the early christians, from 1 Century up to the 4th century,don't believe in the Trinity.The Holy Spirit The 7 Spirits is the Holy Spirit otherwise John worshiped an angel(s) together with the Father and the Son because he was included in the Triune Greeting ansd shocks! Where else could we find an Angel giving " grace and peace"? Jesus as AngelGalations 4:14 even if it's true that he's called an "angel" in here it will not mean that he is a "ethereal creature" but as it is, a "messenger" of God.One who brings message.Pro "Hebrews 1 on the other hand clearly states that Jesus IS NOT an angel"Hebrews 1:9 "Therefore God, Your God, has anointed YouWith the oil of gladness above Your companions"If Jesus isn't an angel, then who are his companions? Humans. Jesus is God incarnate. He is the King of kings and Lord of Lords. I hope I'm very explicit on this. Ante-Nicean QuotesJustin and Irenaues both described The God as Unbegotten and placed the Begotten Son in a place second to God. In place second to God, not in nature but in function and role. The Son is simply the Son per se. The Father is always over the Son just as they are always of one nature.As I said in Round #2, You misinterpret both Justin and Irenaeus. They believe that Jesus, as the Logos, is birthed* by God that is why we have a Father and Son who are of one nature. * Birthed- Again, to be born is very different from to be created. One who is conceived and birthed by someone is a son,of same nature (Greek: homoousios) with the parent and one who is before creation is eternal. The genetic anthropomorphism of "birthed" only denotes " homoousiousness " of the Father and the Son just as one who is born of a human parent is human.Various Quotes from Jesus and PaulI already elucidated clearly about John 17:3 and there's no need to repeat it here.People in Jesus' day knew his blasphemies:John 5:18 The Son is consubstantial with the Father. Equal to him in nature as his own Son PER SE.John 5:19 The Son co-powerful with the Father. He can do only what the Father do.John 5:26 The Son coeval and consubstantail with the Father.John 10:30-38 The Jews clearly accused Jesus of making himself God by saying he and his Father are one.The unity here is something that makes Jesus of one nature with the Father because the Father is God in nature as the Jews wholly understand and Jesus, they say, is blaspheming for he " a human being ( Greek: on anthropon)" makes himself deity/God in nature ( anarthrous theos). The fact that Jesus defended his claim against the Jews using Ps. 82:6* proves that he's eager to reveal his actual being to them albeit they'll not hear and believe because they're not his sheep. The Jews understood Jesus' claim of divinity for they "did not believe"(v. 38) and hence, they had understood the claim.* some humans (the OT Judges) are called "gods" because they function as deity via "rule" but they are not essentially deity that is why the Psalmist said that they will die, showing their true nature as human. On the otherhand, Jesus in John 10:30 is not claiming functional godhood but God in nature per se. The immediate context proves this: Jesus has the very same power/ability as the Father in preserving the sheep not to fell. Again, the text is explicitly clear that it was not because of Jesus' "good works" that they were stoning him but of his claim of being God in nature, I and Father, we're One. Whatever that oneness be, the response of the Jews are clear, Jesus is making himself theos/ God out of that oneness with the Father. Pre-Christian TrinityI say, show me a Trinity teaching before Christ and you shown me tritheisms instead. Mystery TrinityYou say that the trinity is not a mystery. I ask that you explain the trinity in coherent, logical terms.I already did it in Round #2. It is very coherently biblical and logical.An Angel Can't Redeem UsI agree that Job 33:23 is Messianic but it didn't say that the "messenger" is angelic in nature.I don't think God would plan to save people via an angel: "Behold, He puts no trust in His holy ones, And the heavens are not pure in His sight; Job 15:15 Afterall, Hebrews 1:3 is very very explicit that Jesus can't be an angel. He is the exact imprint of the Father's very own nature ( Greek: hupostasis).