Hitler was one of, if not, the most evil being in history

I will proffer another line-by-line rebuttal.Rebuttal:R6) "I respect your constructive criticisms of my arguments, but what I'm trying to argue about here is a few things: (1) oppression is more dehumanizing that death. Here's the thing, you bring up the death toll. True, the death toll of the Nazis was bigger, and it was because it was deliberate death, but here's the thing England and Denmark, plus Sweden (with Finland and parts of Asia, assuming they did conquer Asia), enjoyed torturing their subjects and inflicting pain. In the case of slavery, Danish slavery was said to be the most brutal. True the Nazis murdered, but the English and Danish tortured, oppressed anyone they conquered. I believe that oppression is worse than death. Being chained up, separated from your family and friends, being forced to work for free, and watch your own girl be raped by the master is worse than being sent to the camps to die."CON seems to be under the impression that the Nazis did not oppress or torture their slaves and prisoners. This is again, simply false. The Nazi human experimentation incidents are something worse than torture or oppression, the latter which at least recognizes some basic level of humanity that the victims had. These Nazi experiments reduced the human being to nothing other than a jumble of nerves, flesh, and blood...no feelings, no thoughts, nothing.Twins were sewn together to see whether or not the Nazis could create conjoined twins. Live experiments were conducted where victims were inflicted with hypothermia to see whether or not certain temperatures were survivable. All manners of chemical and biological poisons, what we now consider to be weapons of mass destruction, were inflicted upon Nazi slaves and prisoners to determine lethality. This is not only a fate far worse than mere torture or oppression, that these victims were experimented upon without any consideration for their basic humanity makes it a fate far worse than death.http://en.wikipedia.org...CON's arguments lack any sort of substantiation and seem to be arguments derived from nothing other than a fertile and biased imagination. R7) "Plus the reasons England, Denmark and Sweden did what they did is way more abhorrent than Nazi Germany. There I said it. England and Denmark and Sweden were completely arrogant and snooty in their invasion. "I'm not sure what CON is saying, to which historical period he is referring, or what made the English and Danish "snooty" in whatever invasion he may be discussing. I consider CON to have proffered a non-argument here.R8) " They used Christianity to justify taking over another country and subjugating the people against their own will. "Again, what the Nazis did was far worse. They culled, tortured, and enslaved entire peoples whenever and wherever they invaded. R9) "They also had a lot of hatred towards tomboys and autistic people. "What makes this worse than what the Nazis did to tens of millions of Jews, Russians, and Gypsies? And who was responsible? We know that Hitler was responsible for this deplorable treatment.R10) "Now don't confuse this with Catholicism, as the countries I'm mentioned were Protestant. Nazi Germany was officially Catholic, btw. The Protestants didn't believe in sending missionaries to the countries. They just believed in total elitism. You can say the empires of those countries just oppressed others for the hell of it. Some because of sadism. At least with Nazi Germany, being that England, and you can say Denmark, since they fought against Germany in WWI, screwed them at Versailles in 1919, had a reason to be angry. They just took it out on the wrong group."None of this is relevant to "evil". R11) "England, Denmark and Sweden just thought it was fun to oppress and steal from others."I think the only person trying to have fun here is CON, with history. The tone of CON's argument here does not merit a serious response.ConclusionCON has dropped the vast majority of my rebuttals from the prior round. CON's arguments in this round do not add much substance; much of it is historically inaccurate, unclear, and irrelevant to the resolution.Hitler was one of, if not, the most evil being in history because he was directly responsible for most of the human misery that occurred under the Nazi regime.