Ban Divorce & Interracial Marriage

http://www.youtube.com... ========================================== FINAL INTRO: I would like to thank my opponent for posting his last argument. Although my opponent has finally started to use sources, I am disappointed in his selection of them. Especially the repeats he has already used. Throughout my last argument, I will be using more reliable sources (unlike Wikipedia.) It is plain to see that my opponent has not really refuted my points. Instead, he has used most of his third argument quoting me, then saying a little something on the side. For this round, I will mostly be recapping and clearing things up with real sources. Not a lot needs to be said. ========================================== FINAL ARGUMENT/RECAP: My opponent gives one little article about a Biracial girl being abused by blacks. This proves nothing! August 2009, Whites beat up a black man because he was black. (1) March 2009, Racists attacked a Russian. (2) September 2010, Kids graffiti the word "Nigger" on school property (3) Your source proves nothing! Every race, no matter what color is going to be subject to racism. There is nothing we can do that is going to stop that. You think your source (which is nothing but a Wikipedia link) proves that there are a lot more crimes against Biracial children then black and white. You say this because there are fewer biracial than other races. This is a very bad use of this source. I will provide official government sources about the matter. (4) By looking at either source, you can see that the percentages of the crimes are lower in general with the biracial kids! This shows that the crime rate is just about the same. Either way, it is not enough to stop people from getting married. You claim that biracial children have problems identifying themselves. This is funny, because pretty much every child has trouble identifying themselves. I would appreciate if you would have used sources, not bloggers. Please see source (5) to see the myths of biracial children identifying themselves. It is clear to see that they do not have a problem. And if they did, it is not a huge one that concerns human rights. On the other hand, biracial children can actually fit in more because of their race. They are able to learn about both races and cultures through their parents, and can apply it in the real world. (6) Sadly, you have barely touched on my points about biracial children. Therefore, we shall move on to the subject of divorce. You claim that divorce makes children fall into a bad life. Your sources states that some of the children do. I do not know if you have gone through a divorce as a child, but if you did you will know that this source is not right about everyone. I and my siblings turned out fine. In some states, if the parents request it the child will be taken to physiology courses. This can help the child through their hardships. Think about how hard it would be for the child to have to live with the guy who abused them. You ignored my point about abuse not being reported. You must take this into account. Sooner or later, that man will get out of jail. And will have every right to come into the children's home. Another thing to consider is proof. How could one get proof that their husband is abusing them? If not, the husband could continue in his crimes without going to jail. I mentioned that my father abused me and then called the police on me. I could do nothing to make the police believe me. You say we can make laws to help couples out. Yes, we could do that. And we can also make laws to help kids out after the divorce. Though your points there are irrelevant, since we are not debating about what we could do. Instead we are debating what we should do. The point I made in the example of killing black people is missed. Instead of comparing it to your own argument, you attempt to attack the example. You completely ignore what I said about the overall good of society. I do not even have to explain this, for it is plain to see. You say that because someone has a different skin color, they have different cultures. This can be true, and false. For example, my mom is black and my dad is white. They both went to the same school together. They both lived in Georgia, they both dressed in the same style of clothing. Their cultures were not really that different. On the other hand, a Japanese person marrying a Chinese person can experience different cultures. Though this is not enough to make someone not marry. Of course there are going to be differences, it is going to be like that with any couple. One white man may have had eggs, bacon, and toast for breakfast when he was growing up while a white woman may have just had cereal. This is not enough to separate them. Same goes with cultures. That is the point of marriage, to come together and learn to deal with each others differences. Cultures start by mixing other cultures! Pro ignores my point. I said that not every wife would want to go visit the man who raped her son. He simply says that it's what they SHOULD do. This proves nothing. My point remains that not every wife will do this, therefore his plan would fail. America SHOULD stop buying ice-cream and feed the countries of Africa. Just because they SHOULD do that does not mean the Africans are now no longer hungry. When my opponent talks about just voting a law in that would make the government fund physiology, he forgets where he lives. First of all, the government would not pay for millions upon millions of people to have physiology courses. My opponent assumes that the whole world has money for this, which they do not (America is not the only one who has marriages and divorces.) On the subject of King Henry, we can never know why he truly killed his wives, though my point about spouses killing each other is completely ignored. Pro does not even mention it! For what my opponent has to say about me "poorly reading" his arguments, I have come to the conclusion that he cannot find any sources. I have twice asked for him to show me sources of interracial marriage leading to marrying your pets. He has failed to provide any, but instead shows unverifiable examples. Just because something changes, does not mean that it effects other things in a big way. A few decades ago blacks could not ride on the front seats of the bus. Years later blacks were allowed to have this privilege. Today, gas prices are going through the roof. Both gas prices and blacks effected the buses, though they have nothing to do with each other. Audience, my opponent has failed to refute my argument. He has failed to provide good sources, or defend his own arguments. In the end he claims that we must do this before God's wrath turns on us. I would remind my opponent that Mosses in the Bible was married to a black woman, who was approved by God. (7) Audience, for these reasons I urge you to vote CON. The resolution has been negated. Thank you for reading. Sources: (1). http://www.examiner.com... (2). http://www.opendemocracy.net... (3). http://www.kctv5.com... (4). http://www2.fbi.gov... (5) http://www.defendernetwork.com... (6). http://racerelations.about.com... (7). http://www.alliancenet.org...