Jesus was NOT the Messiah

Shalom! Welcome to the 3rd round. It is finally nice to be debating with someone that knows what they are talking about. Anyway, on to the case. I had to type this up in the last hour so this isn't a full rebuttal. Sorry.RRC1) My opponent contends that it is what the L-RD is going to do, NOT Messiah. At first, this seems convincing when we look at the language. However, when we fully understand the context by reading the before and after verses; we see that it is, in fact, talking about messiah.More on this later. Furthermore, my opponent says "The Hebrew scriptures state that the messiah will clearly fulfill this the first time." There is no mention of a second coming in all of the Torah." This statement is unproven and simply an assertion with no evidence. I obviously cannot type out the entire Jewish Bible to prove that there is no second coming in the Jewish scriptures. So, if you want to, find a verse in the old testament that refers to that--and I will drop this claim.Read the Torah for yourself. http://www.harfordjewish.com... is a complete, free proper translation of the scriptures.Please check my sources that I have in the first round if you really wnat to get a good understanding.RRC2) I will be making sub points here.RRC2A) Furthermore, in the Olivet Discourse, Jesus accurately predicted the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD. This seems to be a confirmation of his prophetic ability. My opponent has not proved this. Give me a source and show me, in the New Testament, where he made this prophecy. Might I remind you, not every prophecy is from G-d; neither is every miracle, sign or wonder. "Everything I command you that you shall be careful to do it. You shall neither add to it, nor subtract from it. If there will arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of a dream, and he gives you a sign or wonder, and the sign or wonder of which he spoke to you happens, [and he] says, "Let us go after other gods which you have not known, and let us worship them," you shall not heed the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of a dream; for the L-RD, your G-d, is testing you, to know whether you really love the L-RD, your G-d, with all your heart and with all your soul." Deuteronomy 13:1-4http://www.harfordjewish.com...Case proven. Just because you make an accurate prediction does not mean it is from G-d. I especially like the bolded part of that passage. If you add or subtract from the law, you are a false prophet and should be killed. Paul is a classic example. He tried to change the kosher law--he subtracted from the law and thus is a liar! Same is true with Jesus.RRC2B) "that Messiah will be called "Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." (Isaiah 9:6) The prophet Isaiah was convinced that the coming child who would be born would be called God and would be Everlasting."Correct. Obviously Jesus died and is not everlasting. Furthermore, let us look at the real passage in Isaiah 9:5-6"For a child has been born to us, a son is given to us, and the authority is upon his shoulder, and the wondrous adviser, the mighty G-d, the everlasting Father, and called his name, "the prince of peace." To him who increases the authority, and for peace without end, on David's throne and on his kingdom, to establish it and to support it with justice and with righteousness; from now and to eternity, the zeal of the L-RD of Hosts shall accomplish this." http://www.harfordjewish.com...Bolded is mine. The L-RD of Hosts shall accomplish this! From that verse alone that YOU have cited, you have proved my case. Jesus died; therefore, he was not everlasting! RRC2C) "We see this in modern rabbinic teaching in that the sacrificial system is no longer necessary." Do you know why it is unecessary? It is unecessary because there is no temple! Sacrifices officially ended in 70 CE when the temple was destroyed. In fact, there are Jews like myself that want to resume sacrifice. In Ezekiel, we see a resume of sacrifice when the messiah comes and builds the 3rd temple.Let us take a good luck at one of those laws that Jesus broke.John 9:14 records that Jesus made a paste in violation of Shabbat, which caused the Pharisees to say (verse 16), "He does not observe Shabbat!"Source: http://www.aish.com...RRC3) Again I will be using subpoints.RRC3A) Actually the Septuagin is not accurate. There are 15 INTENTIONAL mistranslation in there. Source: http://www.aish.com... see the source for additional info!RRC3B) I will go line by line and explain Isaiah 53 (1) Who would believe what we have heard! For whom has the arm of God been revealed! In this opening verse, the leaders of the world are SHOCKED at the fact that Israel has been saved. The arm of G-d always denotes a reference to the Jewish people. (Deut. 26:8). (See also Exodus 3:20, 6:6, 14:31, 15:6; Deut. 4:34, 7:19; Isaiah 51:9, 52:10, 62:8, 63:12; Jeremiah 21:5, 27:5; Ezekiel 20:33; Psalms 44:3, 89:11, 98:1, 136:12). (2) He formerly grew like a sapling or a root from dry ground; he had neither form nor beauty. We saw him, but without a desirable appearance. This imagery of a tree struggling to grow in dry earth is a metaphor for the Jewish struggle in exile. A young sapling in dry ground appears that it will die. The Jews were always a small nation, at times as small as 2 million people, threatened with extinction. In this verse Isaiah describes Israel’s miraculous return from exile, like a sapling that sprouts from this dry ground. This idea appears throughout the Jewish Bible (see Isaiah 60:21, Ezekiel 19:13, Hosea 14:6-7, Amos 9:15). (3) He was despised and rejected of men, a man of pains and accustomed to sickness. As one from whom we would hide our faces, he was despised, and we had no regard for him. This was obvioulsy contradicted by the popularity of Jesus. People came far and wide. Although he died a criminals death, this verse implies a LONG history of rejection--this is contradictory to Jesus. (4) Indeed, he bore our illnesses and carried our pains – but we regarded him as diseased, stricken by God and afflicted. Throughout the centuries of Israel’s exile, many nations persecuted the Jews on the pretense that it was God’s way of “punishing” the “accursed” Jews for having stubbornly rejected the new religions. In these verses, until the end of the chapter, the nations confess how they used the Jewish people as scapegoats, not for the “noble” reasons they had long claimed. Indeed, the nations selfishly persecuted the Jews as a distraction from their own corrupt regimes: “Surely our suffering he did bear, and our pains he carried...” (53:4) (5) He was wounded as a result of our transgressions, and crushed as a result of our iniquities. The chastisement upon him was for our benefit; and through his wounds we were healed.Note: the KJV Bible, and most other bibles, translates as a result to for. This is inaccurate. The most accurate is "Because." (5) He was wounded as a result of our transgressions, and crushed as a result of our iniquities. The chastisement upon him was for our benefit; and through his wounds we were healed.Understand that the result of our transgressions is mistranslated as for our transgressions. This is the most accurate translation. Since I am running out of room, I'll give you my source for this http://www.aish.com...; some copied, most changed/paraphrased.