The conservative view point should be labled as hate speech to eliminate it for ever.

"liberal defending a conservative; this is simply a burden that my opponent is trying to unreasonably assign to me" Why is it so incredibly hard and so absurd to find a single liberal defending a conservative? Surly there must be one example out there. If not, then conservatives must be truly evil and hateful people. If there is not a single liberal of prominence in politics or the news media willing to stand up and say that conservatives don't "hate" children, old people and the middle class. I did point out one example, but as my opponent stated, the writer of the article threw the defender, Bill O'Reilly under the bus for doing so. Now that has to be the epitome of hate for a conservative to throw another conservative under the bus like that. "My opponent has still failed to explain away his fallacious logic, and has failed to prove how disagreeing with liberal ideas is equivalent to hate" Did I not post a litany of sources explaining this? All are the opposite of a liberal point of view and all describe that opposite point of view as "hateful" All go unchallenged not only by liberals but the news media also. One would think the news media would say something to the affect like: Now wait a minute Mr or Mrs. so and so, don't you think that your description of the opposing point of view is just a bit out of line? Nope, I have never heard it, not ever. I have searched and searched I can't find a single video clip or news article even coming close to it. Certainly the news media would call someone out if it were not true. That is their job, to inform people and give both sides of the story in context and that is what they do. Scene no attempt is made, it has got to pretty much true that conservatives are driven by "hate". " It would seem that my opponent himself is filled with hate, not conservatism. " EEH I am defending liberalism not conservatism. Has not all of the information I have provided pretty damning proof of the level of hatred that exists in the conservative movement? I am not hating anything I am pointing out where it all comes from, the conservative movement. Why would it be hateful for me to want to eliminate a source of hate. That would seem virtuous to me, not hateful. Logic dictates that if an accusation goes unchallenged it must be true. As I stated earlier, none of the major news media outlets have been able to disprove the accusations. It would have to be a conspiracy between all of the big three or four networks to not even challenge these accusations. We all know there is no conspiracy or attempt to hide or cover up anything. They are all pretty much fair and balanced for the most part. These are very serious accusations, how could they possibly go unchallenged. The accusations made in the sources I provided would be big news. "b. I did provide one such example source to show that numerous accusations aren't necessarily to be taken as truth. If you want a more complete list of sources, beyond me telling you to google "liberal hate", then I will provide a few:" Liberals are almost always called out when accused of hate. Liberals can not stand hateful speech or thought and discredit anyone in their movement when accused of hate speech or hateful ideas. The only reason A conservative would also take the side of a liberal accused of hate is to try and paint liberals as hateful to hide and direct attention away from themselves. But again this isn't about liberals it is about conservatives and their hate speech and hateful ideas. Just like a conservative my opponent tries to shift the focus away from conservatives and put it on the liberals. By showing a few scatted but "challenged" accusations. The fist source in his last round about Sara Palin has been challenged and proven false by the news media countless times. . http://www.cbsnews.com... The second source about liberals comparing George Bush to Hitler has also been challenged. . http://www.liveleak.com... The third source is a testament to the news media doing what is suppose to do condemning hate speech by conservatives. This site tries to say that liberals are never called out on what they say. One is a Nazi accusation and I have already shown that this has been challenged. The other accusations are from a unknown talk show host who no longer affiliated with NPR. The forth source: Who is Bob Newman and who if anyone gets news from this guy. This is a rant about emails that can't be proven or substantiated in any way. The fifth source is a conservative website that tries in vain to paint liberals as the haters ,again most all of the accusations have been challenged by the news media. I have successfully given sources showing accusations by liberals being challenged. The news media is not so biased that it would just totally ignore all of the sources that I have provided. My opponent has made no attempt to even discredit a single source. Probably because he can't find any, I have looked and can't find a single news source discrediting any of the accusations I have listed. Mabey my opponent will have more luck if he even bothers to look. It is clear that I have given ample proof that liberals are challenged and excoriated and condemned when hate speech is used and so are conservatives. The difference is conservatives are haters and their ideas are based on hate. The accusations must be true because they go unchallenged and no one wants to touch conservative ideas with a ten foot pole to even be connected with the hate that is the conservative movement.