The 4th Dimension is imagination

I am hoping the voters are quick to notice two things when they cast votes: Pro's poor spelling and grammar Pro's refusal to cite any scientific (or other) sources It is never sufficient for a debater to claim that they don't need to cite any data because their points "stand on there [sic] own. " This is an especially egregious error to make when those points, In fact, do not stand on their own. Not by a long shot. Furthermore, I will show that Pro's arguments here, Even if properly formulated, Are nowhere close to being valid, Logical, Or sound in attempting to prove their point or refute mine. As the BoP is on Pro, I should insist that they back up their claims with something beyond what they claim to be "common sense", Especially when they are completely unqualified to make such assertions and actually don't really pose any arguments that make any sense. Pro states that he/she does not want a debate involving reciting formulas in text and getting caught up on semantics. This is far from the reality of proper discourse. There is no rote memorization or regurgitation going on here. Rather, My arguments are well-researched points backed up by scientific evidence from scholarly sources. Anyone who has experience in debate leagues will know this is absolutely essential and that it is virtually impossible to win a debate without a modicum of evidence to counter an opponent's abundance thereof. That aside, On to Pro's points that he/she claims stand on their own:1. Pro offers some convoluted argument about the number of coordinates needed to plot various points in the different dimensions. They say, "shouldn't the 1st dimension actually be two if time is its own coordinate? " This makes utterly 0 sense and further reflects Pro's fundamental misunderstanding of physics and general science. I go back to the example of the work meeting. To tell a person where a meeting is in a large city, They must first tell them the North-South block to go to, Then the East-West block, And then the floor. However, In order to make sure the meeting actually occurs, They must add in the time of this meeting. This is a simplified version of showing how time is the 4th dimension. It requires only one coordinate - the time of the meeting. This is a very obvious demonstration of the way in which time can be a single-coordinate dimension that is interwoven into the fabric of the universe (i. E. Spacetime). 2. This point starts getting into the mind-body problem concerning dualism vs. Materialism, Etc. There is absolutely scientific evidence regarding the way the mind works including concepts like emotions (originating in the amygdala within the limbic system) and such. Though Pro refuses to cite ANY evidence whatsoever, I will gladly do so: https://www. Paulekman. Com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/What-Scientists-Who-Study-Emotion-Agree-About. Pdf https://www. Ncbi. Nlm. Nih. Gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329228/ https://www. Scientificamerican. Com/article/feeling-our-emotions/ https://www. Sciencedaily. Com/terms/emotion. Htm Pro claims that the source for their argument is "Common sense, " however I don't think they are remotely qualified to state what common sense is when it comes to neuroanatomy and biochemistry. That is not to say I am an expert, Though I have studied the subjects at length, But the sources I've cited most certainly are. It is here that, Especially with the Burden of Proof on Pro, They absolutely must use scientific evidence to counter claims. It is not sufficient to say that their arguments "stand on there own" when they have no such grounding. 3. I would say right back to Pro that they should not misquote an argument if they are going to belittle it. That is a complete mischaracterization of my argument, Which I felt was extremely straightforward. In no way am I mentioning the concept of ears burning and someone talking about them. There is absolutely no scientific basis for the phenomenon of "ears burning", So the claim that this perception is occurring in the 4th dimension is a complete non-starter. It would be like saying finding a heads-up penny is good luck so this luck must exist in the 4th dimension. Even if it was proven (which it has never been and will never be) that there is a sensation of ears burning, There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to think this concerns a higher dimension that in someway replaces the universally-agreed-upon concept that the 4th dimension is time. The burning ears myth originated in 77 AD, Far before there existed the technology to categorically rule out its veracity. Before Pro moves on to say they are not willing to cite any sources, They claim, "You should be disturbed, I would be too if people around me were perceiving on a plane higher and I wasn't in on it. " This is very difficult to decipher with its poor grammar, But any interpretation of it is still not logically sound and doesn't really apply properly to this argument.