Government in India should set up brothels and amend anti-prostitution laws.

Rebuttals:1. On the contrary, people are still dying of aids. These are statistics of aids and death in 2012. (1) "Number of deaths: 6,955" Obviously, if people are still dying of aids, it is rare to be cureable. 2. As for condoms, refer to argument 3. Prostitutes don't want the health check. They don't want to be exploited.3. Citations, please? I have shown through my citation that women may not want to wear condoms for a potential boost in profit. Your word is not law.4. Your data is skewed since it doesn't account for the medical care and awareness in the country. It also doesn't adjust for population size. It simply just states how much of the population have aids. This is not realiable data. You did not address the other STDs; so I extend that argument.Rebuttals V2:1. Citation neededCitations are needed for all of this. I have citations for my argument. Again, your word is not law.My point stands firmly in place. "The government of the Netherlands presents itself as a champion of antitrafficking policies and programs, yet it has removed every legal impediment to pimping, procuring and brothels. In the year 2000, the Dutch Ministry of Justice argued in favor of a legal quota of foreign “sex workers,” because the Dutch prostitution market demanded a variety of “bodies” (Dutting, 2001, p. 16). Also in 2000, the Dutch government sought and received a judgment from the European Court recognizing prostitution as an economic activity, thereby enabling women from the European Union and former Soviet bloc countries to obtain working permits as “sex workers” in the Dutch sex industry if they could prove that they are self employed. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Europe report that traffickers use the work permits to bring foreign women into the Dutch prostitution industry, masking the fact that women have been trafficked, by coaching them to describe themselves as independent “migrant sex workers” (Personal Communication, Representative of the International Human Rights Network, 1999). In the year since lifting the ban on brothels in the Netherlands, eight Dutch victim support organizations reported an increase in the number of victims of trafficking, and twelve victim support organization reported that the number of victims from other countries has not diminished (Bureau NRM, 2002, p. 75). Forty-three of the 348 municipalities (12%) in the Netherlands choose to follow a no-brothel policy, but the Minister of Justice has indicated that the complete banning of prostitution within any municipality could conflict with the federally guaranteed “right to free choice of work” (Bureau NRM, 2002, p.19). The first steps toward legalization of prostitution in Germany occurred in the 1980s. By 1993, it was widely recognized that 75% of the women in Germany’s prostitution industry were foreigners from Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay and 4 other countries in South America (Altink, 1993, p. 33). After the fall of the Berlin wall, 80% of the estimated 10,000 women trafficked into Germany were from Central and Eastern Europe and CIS countries (IOM. 1998a , p. 17). In 2002, prostitution in Germany was established as a legitimate job after years of being legalized in tolerance zones. Promotion of prostitution, pimping and brothels are now legal in Germany. The sheer volume of foreign women in the German prostitution industry suggests that these women were trafficked into Germany, a process euphemistically described as facilitated migration. It is almost impossible for poor women to facilitate their own migration, underwrite the costs of travel and travel documents, and set themselves up in “business” without intervention. In 1984, a Labor government in the Australian State of Victoria introduced legislation to legalize prostitution in brothels. Subsequent Australian governments expanded legalization culminating in the Prostitution Control Act of 1994. Noting the link between legalization of prostitution and trafficking in Australia, the US Department of State observed: “Trafficking in East Asian women for the sex trade is a growing problem…lax laws – including legalized prostitution in parts of the country – make [anti-trafficking] enforcement difficult at the working level” (U.S. Department of State, 2000, p. 6F). " (2)Rebuttals V3.Citation needed. Your word is not law. My case still stands.This is relevant to the debate. It shows that even when offered a legal alternative, prostitutes will still conduct illegal business. Whether it's private or government maintained, it shows they will seek other alternatves.Rebuttals V4.Citations needed. Your word is not God.Overall, my opponent lacks in his citations and has formulated a sloppy rebuttal. Citations are needed. His round one and two arguments lack in citations; thus aren't relevant. 1. http://tinyurl.com...;2. http://www.embracedignity.org...;