New World Order: Does the idea of a totalitarian one-world government exist.

I look forward to having a great debate with you. First and forthermost: The dream of a one world government is unachieveable. This world is just too big to compromise. No secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government""which replaces sovereign nation-states, because a nation respect it's sovereign. -A nation woudln't want it country to be under authoritarian world when ever nations have its own beliefs. Let's take the US for example: The US basic human rights belief: Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Hapiness is not universally respected. The US wouldn't want it's citizens to enjoy the freedoms no other nations enjoy. "It is hard to imagine any US president giving up American sovereignty to any organization, particularly the UN. However, some especially paranoid conservatives and libertarians believe that now that the Democrats are in power, it's only a matter of time until a socialist one-world government is instated and American sovereignty is given up. Dissenters would naturally have to be controlled or eliminated somehow. " "Its popularization among conspiracy theorists can be traced to over thirty years ago when "New World Order" appeared in the 1972 book None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, a John Birch Society writer. Allen claimed it to be the "code word" which the International Communist ConspiracyTM would use when they were ready to unveil their secret plans for a socialist world government. This book was widely read in right-wing conspiracy-minded circles during the 1970s and is probably the source of the hysteria that later erupted over the term. The first high-profile use of "New World Order" by a politician was in a speech given by George H. W. Bush after the Cold War ended. [3] In that speech, Bush was explaining that, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States and Russia would cooperate, rather than compete. All international relations experts agree that at that point, the old order of bipolarity had ended, and a new system was coming into place. The exact nature of the new system has been greatly debated over the years. " History of the terms. .. : During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II. -This world as been through so many wars. Some the terms "a new world order" was used as a time of change in this world. The balance of power not meaning bringing the world under one control, both a balance of power in politcal so as to has one person making all decisions which could eventually lead to war. Let's take Adolf Hitler for example, a military dictator who used Germany with iron fist. Where all decisions were made by him and him only. Where the whole country follow. Through all this an estimated 50m people will murder! This balance of power is to make sure such history does not repeat itself. - NWo is an opportunities to implement idealitstic proposals for global governance to address worldwide problems such as poverty, wars, and ruthless governments. For decades nations have remain nation-states trying to solve all problems by itself. And no nations can. And that's why this idea came up. These proposals has lend to the creation of the United Nations, IMF, WB, NATO, and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which many people as refer to as the regime to create a one world government. The United Nations is a organizations of Nations with each representatives, it is not a orgnization with secretaive to control world domination. Some of us may claim that the United Nations is of this one world government but yet the same United Nation is the same organization helping poor nations around the world. Trying to provide the basic things for human beings. Risking sons and daughters into nations that are in civil war only to bring the peace and to keep the peace. Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power in favor of the United States as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism. These creations in particular and liberal internationalism in general, however, would always be criticized and opposed by American ultraconservative business nationalists from the 1930s on. [8] -Capitalism has build better economys than that of Socalism and Communism. But some countries haven come to relieze that thats why there countries still reamins poor today. I am not saying that Socialism or Communism world but if we can see China has been making many reforms with its Communism beliefs and today it turning to Capitalism. Though it have full pick it up. So BWS and GATT are working to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism so nations can better. Progressives welcomed these new international organizations and regimes in the aftermath of the two World Wars, but argued they suffered from a democratic deficit and therefore were inadequate to not only prevent another global war but also foster global justice. The United Nations was designed in 1945 by U. S. bankers and State Department planners, and was always intended to remain a free association of sovereign nation-states (the same nation that created the United Nation and intent to reamin a free association wouldn't change the whole UN into a authorain government. Because that is abiviously want they don't want. ), not a transition to democratic world government. Thus, activists around the globe formed a world federalist movement hoping in vain to create a "real" new world order. [9] "British writer and futurist H. G. Wells would go further than progressives in the 1940s by appropriating and redefining the term "new world order" as a synonym for the establishment of a technocratic world state and planned economy. [10] Despite the popularity of his ideas in some state socialist circles, Wells failed to exert a deeper and more lasting influence because he was unable to concentrate his energies on a direct appeal to intelligentsias who would, ultimately, have to coordinate a Wellsian new world order. "[11] - many of our people can get influence easily these days. Most don't think for the better. Many will fall for the trap. Simply because this guy wrote a book a new orld order---technocratic world state and planned economy, it has gain popularity. Let me extend on this. .. because some people said that the pyramid symbol on the back of the US dollar represent the new orld order many people has felt for it. So many of our people haven't learned history. I don't know weather its not taught in our schools or we just simply ignore it. The symbol on the back of the US dollar represent a pyramid and the eye of God watching upon this nation during its war with Great Britain. During the Red Scare of 1947"1957, agitators of the American secular and Christian right, influenced by the work of Canadian conspiracy theorist William Guy Carr, increasingly embraced and spread unfounded fears of Freemasons, Illuminati, and Jews being the driving force behind an "international communist conspiracy". The threat of "Godless communism" in the form of a state atheistic and bureaucratic collectivist world government, demonized as a "Red Menace", therefore became the main focus of apocalyptic millenarian conspiracism. -Didn't Adolf Hitler acus the Jews of the Germany the Jews of the Germany losing the war. Wasn't that his purpose of killing all those jews. Isn't it these same acuse people are now trying to use against fremasons, illuminati, and the jews as the "driving force behind an "international communist conspiracy. " GEO-POLITICAL and ECONOMIC UNIONS -Pe