Abortion

"Now if a teenager participates in the actions(sex) in what could produce a child then she knows the risks and what could possibly happen! Now one that has ever had sex has said 'I didn't know that I could get pregnant because of having sex'"You're asserting that giving birth is the responsible choice in the event of an unwanted pregnancy, but this is an opinion.However, if we take a deeper look at what you're saying, you think getting an abortion is avoiding responsibility. This implies that it's a woman's responsibility to bear a child if she chooses to have sex. This sounds more like an argument trying to dictate a woman's role and purpose rather than the argument about the life of a child. "And how many teenagers do you know are married? How can they get divorced?" I was talking about the future, when they can legally marry they are much more likely to be divorced. "Now you may have 'psychological torture' because of the rape and the child, but more women who have their baby aborted say that they regret their decision, so it can happen either way."Key word: More. I read the article you linked, and what I saw was 7 women who had been raped and had their children. I don't see how this means "more women" didn't regret their decision. In fact, I have an article that states the opposite:"According to a new study that tracked hundreds of women who had abortions, more than 95 percent of participants reported that ending a pregnancy was the right decision for them. Feelings of relief outweighed any negative emotions, even three years after the procedure."http://wonkette.com...http://wonkette.com..."Divorce is a multitude of things that a couple has a difficulties with, and you don't have to house the baby, you can put the baby up for adoption and other situations"So, adoption is a viable alternative to abortion?This implies that the only reason a woman would want to get an abortion is to avoid raising a child, and that isn't the case. Depending on the circumstances, the mere act of having a child in the hospital can cost between $3,000 and $37,000 in the United States. That, and giving birth is a dangerous thing; in the United States, pregnancy complications are the sixth most common cause of death for women between the ages 20 and 34."But with these problems that they face when growing up to the age of 23, does that mean the life is just not worth living for anymore?"You've used this argument twice, and I think this is an appropriate time to bring up the death of Savita Halappanavar.Mrs. Halappanavar died in 2012 at the age of 31. here are the details: http://www.dailymail.co.uk...Mrs. Halappanavar was found to be miscarrying when she was admitted to Galway University Hospital. The dentist, who was 17 weeks pregnant, was denied a medical termination despite being in agonizing pain. She went on to suffer a miscarriage, and developed septicaemia which killed her on October 30th, 2012. This all happened because of the prohibition of abortion.You used the "Do these things mean the life isn't worth living anymore?" argument twice.A right to life does not imply a right to live by threatening somebody else's life, because bearing children is dangerous and is always a threat to the mother's life. A right to life, by the way, is a right not to have somebody else's will imposed upon your body. Do women not have this right as well? Sources:Listed throughout the argument.