Communism

My opponent claims that democracy leads to protest's, however there are different levels of oppression and different levels of progression. When looking into communism, we find that the level of oppression it provides is far from minor blood shed, or minor riots, it is genocide. Lets now take a look at the riots my opponent claims was caused by democracy. to do so, we must look into the evidence provided by my opponent. 1. http://www.nationmaster.com...: This source basically says that the trafficking rate in china continues to grow. Looking into this issue we find that it is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. The trafficking rate although a major issue, is not directly caused by democracy. My opponents citation states that the trafficking is caused by the citizens and international players and not by the government. Unless my opponent is able to provide a reliable evidence showing China's government as a whole involved in human trafficking, then this argument should be void. A small part of China's government involved in human trafficking cannot be evidence that democracy itself is responsible. http://www.centreforaviation.com... please look into the evidence I provided. 2. http://www.huffingtonpost.com...: This evidence documents certain protest against the government in Russia. Looking into this evidence, we find that the fact that these citizens are freely protesting and the highest injustice done so far, is the arrest of these protesters, is a sign that Russia, whether democratic or not, is doing far better than communist Russia. These people, Have been able to freely protest meaning that certain liberties formally given to them now exist. http://www.departments.bucknell.edu... please take a look at the Russian constitution. http://eng.yabloko.ru... 3.http://en.wikipedia.org...: this source makes absolutely no sense. It shall be taking lightly simply because it is a Wikipedia source. Looking into this evidence, we find that the soviet Union took away the basic rights of there citizen's. I then result in asking this question, Would you rather live in a democratic country such as the U.S, or a country such as the soviet with no liberty. Not only has history presented us with this answer, but it has provided several scenarios confirming this answer. Lets now take a look into economy. A properly ran nation is one that allow its nation to partake in free market. With communism, a country does not have free market, but all enterprise is controlled by the government. We find that not only are these countries poorer than democratic country (Cuba Vs. U.S) , but we find that these nations are often less organized and more likely to fall apart (soviet Russia). The lack of free markets creates a situation in which there is no domestic competition in the market. This then delays progression and since the government is running the market, there is limited ideas and limited diversity. In today's world, a healthy public market competition is the base to a nations foundation. Without this, there is absolutely no way a country could play a huge or even honorable role in the global market. http://businesspan.com... I look forward to my opponents argument.