It is possible that a flying pink unicorn exists (2)

My opponent makes one sole argument to defend his case and refute my own. He does nitpick a bit at some minor points but overall there is only one real contention he puts forth. This is very easily rebutted. In fact all it needs is one sentence for response, and I will, I think, have won this debate. But I of course will go further than that. The scientific laws of our planet Earth do not apply to every world in the universe. My opponent basically puts forth the weight of the FPU as reason why it would not be able to fly. What is his reasoning behind this? He reasons that because all other animals ever known to earth would never have been able to fly with a heavy weight, such as the FPU would have, than it cannot exist. Allow me to point out the major flaw in my opponents argument. My opponent is using the laws of the earth to support his claim. Namely the force of gravity which is basically what weight is. Gravity is different in every planet. Thus my opponents argument has been negated. For example the moon has a much lower force of gravity than the earth and thus flying there would be much easier. We must conclude of course that many many planets would not have a force of gravity strong enough to keep the FPU from flying. My opponent also assumes wings are the only tool necessary for flying. It is likely that there are other possible methods of flying, especially when we take into account the possibility of an infinite universe. Let me also go as far as saying, in places where gravity might be very low, it could be said that even humans could fly. For flying is basically propelling yourself through the air. It was never defined in this debate, but let's not be semantical. If a life form was able to move about through the air without gravity pushing it to the ground we would say it is flying. Thus a pink horse with a horn in its head could be able to fly in certain circumstances without the use of wings. I would also like to point out one occasion where my opponent, in attempting to rebut me, makes a statement that would instead advocate my case. //Ultimately the "personal witness argument" only has merit if it comes with credibility. If a world-renowned biologist claims to have spliced together a flying horse, perhaps then there would be a .01% chance of its existence. Since no scientist is making this claim, or ever will, it remains at 0%. //My opponent is saying that if a world-renowned biologist were to make the claim that he had spliced together a flying horse, then we would have to believe it a small possibility. Therefore he is accidentally conceding the fact that it is possible to exist. For if he believes that it might be true if a biologist were to make the claim, then he believes it might be true. I don't see how this could not count as concession. I have fulfilled my burden of proof my opponent has not at all. As my opponents arguments have been thoroughly dismantled, let me just asses everything quickly. Conclusions Paradoxical characteristics. As shown my opponent has provided no paradoxical characteristics in the least. He attempts too, but the laws of earth are completely different too that of other planets. Personal witness argument My opponent claims to have refuted me by attempting to affirm the impossibility of the statement. But it is not in the least bit impossible as I have shown thus I extend this argument. If my opponent thinks that I might be crazy as he suggests then I will just ignore that. Infinite Universe argument My opponent does make one change to my third premise. Third premise being, "An infinite amount of planets would mean an infinite amount of possible life forms". His adjustment is that it must include a set of parameters. If my opponent makes an argument that I believe I will need to argue against my opponents adjustment than I will do so. However even with this minor change my case still works. Non-existence My opponent still needs to show how the FPU is contrary to any hard facts. My opponent attempts to use the laws of the earth to advocate his case. Namely gravity. These laws are different everywhere in the universe. Not is this just a possibility but a scientific fact. The FPU would easily be able to fly in many certain circumstances, such as when the force of gravity is very low.