It is a more reasonable outlook for one to be racist than sexist.

Members of the floor, I will be putting forward my points that, sexism is a more reasonable outlook that racism. 1. The Role of Women in NatureThe aims and goals in nature are perceived in an evolutionary stance. The goal is to reproduce and keep the species alive. The female, are the ones in the majority of cases to give birth. The females are going to carry on the species and it relies upn them. This means that the men have to be proactive. The female animal is more likely to procreate. Humans themselves, the female is more open to a variety of sexual pleasure whereas males are more pedantic[1]. The male has to find a mate and beat all other men to competition, which is why men generally have to display. Whether it is wooing, singing, showing off your feathers as a male peacock does, or fighting, the men in species have to challenge themselves and fight for their chances at spreading their seed. This in turn, in most cases creates an almost patriarchal society, where the role of the female is to give birth, take care of their children and protect them, which is very evident in large cats such as lions, where the female is the predominant hunter in familial packs. The role of women in nature becomes one of a mother in the end, whereas the males are generally mroe free to hunt, play or relax, shown again in lions as the male sleeps up to twenty hours a day[2]. In the end, especially in mammals, we see that women are mothers and males do the searching, leading and are put on a higher pedestal, and this is my point, which I will summarise later. We can then in turn, translate this to manking.2. The Role of Women in HistoryBefore first-wave feminism in the 19th century started from the Suffragette Movement, a women's place was decided. In the kitchen, as a housewife. Giving birth and caring for their children. Only recently has this changed, but as late as the 1960s only 28% of women worked[3]. This chart below shows women working in certain industries. But do you see the correlation between this and the animal kingdom? We see in the Bible, 1 Corinthians 11:3 - "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman [is] the man; and the head of Christ [is] God," and Genesis 3:16 - "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."We do not need to look far back in history to see that. Women only recieved suffrage in the U.K in 1928, whereas men had recieved suffrage in 1832. Only in this newly progressive society do we see equality being strived for, but for so long was the role of a woman set in stone, and was just tradition, and was not immoral. In African, to western to Asian society was the role of a woman similar to that of most mammals. And this is where my argument is leading to. Naturally and traditionally, did this happen, and once it does, it is easy to claim that men are superior. They have a reason to. Anatomically women are weaker, and in history men worked. They were more intelligent, stronger, braver, thoughtful and educated. Historically, men were made better until it reached the point where it wouldn't be too hard to fall into the illusion that men were superior. And even worse, it was accepted. People would be indoctrinated and brainwashed and forced into a seemingly patriarchal society, so could easily see that men were better. And we see the remnants of that today. We see that there are 5,100,000 stay at home mothers in America, but only 176,000m. After thousands of years having this message put, it is not easy to just obliterate it. So let us compare this to racism.3. Role of Racism in HistoryRacism is the notion that a race superior to the other. A race is simply a form of classifications that humans make. "Race" is our idea, and generally this idea is formed from the slave trade. Without going into too much detail, people were viewed as less because of their skin colour. Because of their culture and unorthodox ways. Because their society was different, strange and founded on things which seems weird. Because they weren't as intelligent as they know it, and weren't as civilised. But everything here is subjective. The need for this is subjective, whereas the need for display in animals, procreation or childcare isn't. Realise at that time they weren't as knowledgeabe about them, so racist, bigoted claims that Americans make about their black people woudn't be there to make as an objective claim. All they had were subjective views, following their popular mentality about morals, and decided that black people weren't worthy. Racism in general is always bigoted and subjective, as there is no reason to hate a whole race because the only things that keeps them similar may be one small thing like skin colour. People fall too easily into stereotype, but stereotypes aren't objectively true for all. In short, there is no valid objective claim for racism, and if there is I would love to hear it. Sexism can be naturally justified, historically justified, psychologically and anatomically justified. Male and female are more definite than race and are natural in their roles and have historical roles. Race is a human construct which can only have a cultural justification, but that is implying that all people are involved of set race in set culture, which is an absurd notion to have. Whether you can continue as a race with races but not sexes is irrelevant. Yes it is true, but women can still be looked down upon for these reasons I have gone into, for the parallel with nature and religious to animalistic justifications. Sexism makes more sense because it has always existed, all we have done is label it sexism. Animals in general live like they adhere to this, we just haven't labelled it sexist. Humans were like that, and we have only recently labelled it sexist. Racism on the other hand has no natural or objective justification thus is not more reasonable.Sources:[1] The Sex Reseachers, Ep. 3.[2] http://www.omg-facts.com...http://www.debate.org...