Evolution vs Young Earth Creationism

Catastrophic EventsI would like to ask NewLifeChristian where it says in the Bible about severe seismic earthquakes reshaping the continents. Or is that simply just an assumption that he is making? The Great Flood according to creation theory seems to be God causing a flood, due to the sin from Adam and Eve rebelling from god. I don't understand where the part about seismic activity is, unless you want to say that it's a coincidence all continents can fit together. Historical accuracy of the Bible While the exact location of the hanging gardens might not be known, why are they called the 'Hanging Gardens of Babylon?' Further more, I mentioned earlier that this has nothing to do with Evolution and Young Earth Creation. A book could say that the Earth orbits the sun, and it could say that water evaporates at 120 degrees centigrade. My opponent must give evidence of Creation outside the Bible. My opponent did not bother to refute the main point of my argument, instead they seem to try to prove that the Hanging Gardens prove why the Bible is true. DNA supports Creation?If humans and chimps were 4% related to each other, one could easily say "it's proof God designed all animals very differently and individually." The argument for DNA supporting creation is literally just saying "God made it like that, so it's proof for Creation." They seemingly ignored the argument I presented earlier. Also, I never brung up DNA evidence as an argument for Evolution in this debate.Dinosaur BloodNewLifeChristian argues that there weren't enough time-related measurements to explain why it could last millions of years. I'm not sure where my opponent is coming by this, but i'm going to assume that it's because you can't replicate millions of years in a lab. While this is true, it doesn't mean we can't make logical measurements and conclusions regarding the decaying/drying of the blood. They then go on to arguing that the bone did not have scientists treating it with chemicals to preserve it, and that there was no evidence of nearby iron. This is not true, because Iron is abundant in many living cells and tissues. The iron from the cells and tissues in the dinosaurs body could have preserved the bones, it does not need a scientist to help preserve it. [1]Earth's magnetic fieldNewLifeChristian has simply stated that what I said isn't true, and there's research to prove me wrong. He has simply ingored my previous argument, and not cared to explain the science behind the research proving so. I would like to challenge my opponent to explaint he so called "research" on how we can use the magnetic field to measure the age of the Earth. I have already explained my point here.sources1. http://www-als.lbl.gov...Why I did better than my opponentPart of the debate format was to explain why we did better than our opponent in round 5. NewLifeChristian seems to be one round late in debunking my arguments, and in Round 4, he argued against the points I made in round 3, instead of focusing on my arguments in round 4. Further more, NewlifeChristian has included biased sources, none of them are actual scientific sources. I've included several university sites and scientific journals to prove my points. My opponent has also used Conservapedia to name one unreliable and biased source. Further more, he has dodged much of my points made. He dodged my argument on transitionary fossils using quote mining, and simply said "stars were created supernaturally" in response to my argument on starlight to name a few examples.