Via Intelligent Design, an infinitely-inteligent, creator god cannot be logically justified

Something cannot be so complicated that it had to be designed Complexity, as a product of understanding, arises when something needs to be complex. For example, a television set is not complicated for any reason other than because it has to be. If that particular television set was not as complicated, then it would either work sub-optimally or not at all. There are certain components in a television set that need to be present, or else it won’t work. Hence, the television set is as complicated as it has to be – it does not make sense to say that something is so complex that it had to be designed. Things that are unnecessarily complex show a lack of understanding Comparatively, a television set can be more complicated than it needs to be, but this would indicate a product that lacks understanding. If the television set were to have extra wires that did not impede nor benefit the system, then you could say that the designer of the television set did not fully understand what was required. The goal of intelligence is to strive for working simplicity (i. e. making working things that are as simple as possible), and making things unnecessarily complex does the exact opposite. To say that the universe is ‘finely tuned’ is to say that the creator god is not omnipotent If the universe is finely tuned, then it would imply that god doesn’t have any control over aspects of our reality, otherwise he wouldn’t have to tune in the first place. The fact that he can ‘play the universe out of tune’ suggests that he can create a flawed universe, of which he does not want (hence the tuning). This is not to mention how silly it is that god has to make up for his mistakes when he sets the rules in the first place. To say that the universe is finely tuned is to contradict the nature of the creator god. It is not possible to demonstrate infinite intelligence and infinite power at the same time In order for god to demonstrate infinite intelligence, he would have to limit himself to a test of some kind. When no limits are available and no goals are known, unintelligent actions are indistinguishable from intelligent ones. So, god must limit himself and set knowable goals in order to show that he is infinitely-intelligent (or else give us some kind of alternative way of measuring intelligence, of which he has yet to give us). However, in limiting himself to testing conditions, he, at the very least, hides his omnipotence – you cannot play a game of chess in order to show how smart you are, without first limiting yourself to the rules. And thus, it can be written as so: Demonstrations of omnipotence require the absence of limitations Demonstrations of intelligence require the presence of limitations Conclusion Evidence for god, via complexity, indicates nothing. For humans, Intelligence (limited) and Omnipotence (unlimited) are mutually exclusive, and such a creator god could only ever appear contradictory in our eyes. Via Intelligent Design, an infinitely-inteligent, creator god cannot be logically justified. References Arguments taken from the Youtube channel, 'TrenchantAtheist'. . https://www.youtube.com...