Star Wars is better than Star Trek

I will know refute Con’s argumentsCultural Impact"But people also quote lines from Star Trek, such as "Beam Me Up, Scotty.”Con hasn’t proven that this quote is popular. Before he asks me to prove if my quotes are popular I shall do it.http://www.afi.com...According to the American film institute, they have ranked “May the Force be with you” 8th. No where in this list are quotes taken from the Star Trek movies. Con argues that people use “Beam Me Up Scotty”, but the quote I provided has more credibility than his, because I gave sources to back my argument up that it is famous.Kirk and Spock are considered to be among such great artistic pairings, such as Frodo and Sam, or Sherlock Holmes and Watson.This also applies to Star Wars.http://www.huffingtonpost.com...Huffington Post gives C-3PO and R2-D2 #2 spot for most iconic duos in movieshttp://www.ranker.com...Ranks Han Solo & Chewbacca #4"I'd like to point out that Star Trek came out 11 years before Star Wars did. And it's special effects brought much acclaim, and it drew a much greater audience than expected. “Con hasn’t provided sources to say Star Trek got critical acclaim.Here are my sources for what I said about critical acclaim.http://www.britannica.com...So far, Con has not given sources to where he thisCon simply listed technologies that were inspired by Star Trek. Now let me list some inventions inspired by Star Wars.http://miami.cbslocal.com...The builder of this device says he named it Luke Arm, after what happened to Luke SkyWalker.http://www.latinpost.com...CNN used the holographic video effect from Star Wars to serve as a technological tool for CNN during the 2008 U.S elections."To conclude, saying that Star Trek didn't have any cultural impact is foolish. It had an amazing cultural impact, praised for it's stories, that examine the human nature, and it's pioneering effects. But it also had a monumental impact on the field of technology.""Both have had affects on American culture, but the Star Wars Franchise was more prominent, due to the fact that it had a broader range of audience, and it won more academy awards.” I never said it didn’t, I said Star Wars's impact was moreprominent. In fact, you never refuted that Star Wars had a broader audience, and it won more academy awards.So far, Con has only really listed technogical innovations that were inspired by Star Trek. I cannot take his earlier arguments into consideration, because he gave no sources.SCOREJerry Goldsmith, won the International Film Music Critics Award. Star Trek: Voyager, won many music awards in the Emmy's while it was on air. Goldsmith also won the BMI Film Music Award for his score for Star Trek.Let me list the total number of awards JohnWilliams won. The reason why I didn’t list them in the first round is because the Oscars are the more prominent one.http://www.imdb.com...Apart from his Academy Award, He wonGolden Globes- Best Original Score - Motion PictureStar Wars(1977)Anthony Asquith Award for Film Music- Empire Strikes Back(1981)Anthony Asquith Award for Film Music- New Hope(1978)Saturn Award- Star Wars (1978)BMI Film Music Award- Star Wars Attack of the Clones (2003)BMI Film Music Award- Star Wars the Phantom MenaceGrammy- Empire Strike Back (1981)Grammy- New Hope (1978)There are a ton more awards on the link I provided.So I have now shown that John Williams was a moresuccessful composer than Jerry Goldsmith. Merchandise Con attempts to try avoid refuting my argument by saying,"Remember, the definition of successful is acheiving one's aims or goals, and selling video games was never an aim for the Star Trek”In my first round I stated,"Star Wars franchise has been more successful than the Star Trek Franchise” I proved the Star-Wars was more successful, by attracting the youngeraudience. Selling video games, ismerely a way for a business to expand and become a successful franchise. Whatever the intentions of the Star-Trek franchise were, it didn’t sell merchandise like the Star Wars franchise to make it’s franchise more successful.Before I refute the other arguments, I would like Con to know these merely are his opinions, and for others it might be different Characters "Star Trek had much better alien charcters. The most glaringly obvious one being Spock, who, even though was an alien, was portrayed in a way for the audience to relate to him. Anyone can relate to being an outsider, surrounded by those different from you”Being more related to isn’t an accurate way of measuring something is better. I’m sure many were able to relateto Darth Vader’s struggle and turmoil throughout the whole saga."the alien characters are not understandable, as they speak in unknown languages, that sound like gibberish to the audience. Off the top of my head though, I can think of one Star Wars alien who could be understood, and that is, Jar Jar Binks.”Alienbelonging to a foreign country or nation.Technically, every thing in Star Wars was alien, but I will go with the regular stereotype that an alien is something that looks non-human.Con says alien characters in Star-Wara are not understandable, even though in every single movie, when an Alien spoke another language, there were subtitles.I would like you to know the following were also aliensYodaDarth MaulGeneral GreviousNute GunrayAdmiral AckbarVentressKi-Adi-MundiAll of them spoke English.It is quite ridiculous that Con thinks Jar Jar is the only talking alien, when more important characters like Yoda existed.StoryThis is entirely his opinion, Star Wars is much more than the movies it's thousands of comic books, dozens of games and hundreds of books. The fans have taken the Star Wars universe to the very beginning of the Jedi, to the wars between the Empire and the new Sith overlords of the galaxy more than a century after the rebel victory over Endor. This also leads me to my other argument.SustainabilityDue to Star-Wars effectivley capturing the younger market, it make sense more me to infer that Star-Wars will last longer in terms of popularity and influence compared to Star Trek. This is evident that kids from the 80's who are not most likely in their 40's or 50's still adore Star Wars. Star Trek audience is mainly in its older audience, whereas Star-Wars is making an impact on all markets, young and old. For these reasons Star Wars will likely last longer.