Eish HaMilchama

"""""The Mishnah, to my understanding and education, is just commentary on the Torah. Since the Torah is partly made up of laws (it"s also part narrative, see Genesis; in this case, a history book teaching about spirituality), it too teaches on law. Mostly regarding spiritual law. The reason why I still believe you took it out of context is because you"re trying to say that we shouldn"t understand the Torah today, that it"s an old, dead document, and cold as stone. That we cannot phantom what Moshe knew, and you try and prove that by stating that Moshe knew more than one G-d. Therefore, they do "bare" resemblance, stop trying to make me the fool."""" The Mishna brought to this debate has nothing what so ever to do with obstruse discussions about Hebrew letters. One obstruse commentary holds that the Torah begins with ב and not א because ברוך comes from ב while ארור comes from א; the difference between blessing and cursing. You want kabbala, then study the T'NaCH liturature - its called kabbala. Kabbala sounds like something mysterious. Bunk. Kabbala its just a word for masoret which means tradition. """"Yes, the Torah"s main focus is spiritual, but I bet you no one would listen to it if you were to say the Exodus (a historical event) never happened."""" Bunk. Your idle speculation proves nothing. The mythology of the Greek Gods never in fact happened. While learning in public school I studied Greek mythology in the 9th grade. The Gospels of the New Testament never happened. Proof the earliest Book of Mark was written 60 to 80 years after the fact. The Book of John - some 200 years after the imaginary man walked the earth. Jesus son of Zeus - a simple myth just like his father! Furthermore, all the Books of the New Testament, including the letters of Paul, originally written in Greek - not Hebrew or Aramaic - the language of the Jewish people. Therefore, the target audiance - Goyim not Jews. The question stands against the New Testament fraud - events that never really happened but people read these mythologies and believe them to be true - why did the letters of Paul, written about 50 ce, come after the Gospel Books? [allot of Gospel Books were excluded from the Cannon, Gospel of Judas (https://en.wikipedia.org...), a Gospel written about the same time as that of John]. The Gospels claim to give eye witness testimony, but that's clear false witness testimony. What does the Torah say about false witnesses? Why did the letters of Paul, written about 50 ce, come after the Gospel Books? This question requires further analysis, but its quite complicated. A simple reading of the Book of Acts suggests that Paul served as an Agent Provocateur for Rabban Gamliel, the Nassi of the Great Sanhedrin. Paul travelled to Syria and was stoned. Syria its a dispute among the Sages whether its part of the land of Israel. Syria was conquerred by king David. But that [real] dispute aside, Paul, no Sanhedrin tried him for a Capital Crimes offense - the worship of Jesus as God, a new God which the fathers of Israel never knew. A Torts Court of 3 judges tried Paul - both in Syria and in Rome! The Judges who try civil damages cases do not have a legel degree to judge Capital Crimes cases under Jewish law. Yet, wonder of wonders, in both Syria and Rome, a Torts Court tried Paul for a Capital Crime offense! The judicial authority of the Sanhedrin, its limited only to the land of Israel. Hence Syria according to 50% of the rabbis lay outside of Israel! Torts Court in Syria ruled Paul guilty of the Capital Crime of avoda zara. That ruling clearly based itself upon the sin of worshipping foreign Gods. Paul was stoned. But not according to halacha - Jewish law! Stoning, according to halacha, a prisoner - taken to a 3 story scaffold, naked. The prisoner the authorities bound hand and foot. Then pushed off the scaffold unto a jagged boulder below. The Talmud teaches that no man ever survived such a traumatic impact. Yet Paul was stone by people throwing stones - not Jewish law - and walked away from the stoning on his own power! If the Jews sought to infiltrate an Agent Provocateur among the early Xtians, then this charade of justice worked. Paul immediately started preaching that Goyim were not under the Law - a true statement. Goyim never accepted the brit of Sina and therefore have no obligation of "we shall do and hear" to obey the laws of Moshe! Paul next preached that brit mela did not apply to Goyim who accepts Jesus son of Zeus as God. This caused all Jewish followers of this avoda zara to abandon this new God. Another Torts Court in Rome tried Paul and found him innocent of committing the Capital Crime of avoda zara. Paul left the Court and started preahing Jesus the King of the Jews; Jesus the Son of God. This preaching threatened Ceasar. Ceasar held that he was both Son of God and King of the Jews. The polytheistic - multiple Gods - society of Rome, Paul injected a limited monotheistic belief system. The law of revolutions, which Yechuda Maccabee injected into the Greek Syrian empire, the Maccabbees challenged not only the authority of the King of Syria, they challenged the validity of his worship of the Gods as well! As an Agent Provocateur, Paul accomplished the exact same strategy with his preaching of Jesus son of Zeus. The Great Sanhedrin sought to undermine the Roman civilization by cracking its "ethical containment force", meaning the collective soul of that specific civilization. For example: the French, Russian, Nazi, and Iranian revolutions of the 18th and 20th centuries all accomplished by the "cracking of the ethical containment force" of those societies. Robespierre attacked both the validity of king and church. Lenin and Troskii did the same in Russia. Hitler challenged the validity of both domocracy and the Judeo-Christian tradition; Ayatollah Khomeini not only denounced the Shah as illegitament, he attacked the value of the morals embraced by the western democracies! Pauls letters, written in the 50s CE had no knowledge what so ever of the later Gospels. Jesus son of Zeus - an imaginary mythical man. """"I clearly recall you saying that there is no Name of G-d in the first commandment."""" We communicate by writing to each other. ""Saying"", that's utterly absurd. """It seemed to me that you"re just saying the name of G-d isn"t in Torah.""" Dude the Name of the God of Israel its found throughout the Torah. Duh! You even admitted to your error. """""Yes, the first commandment doesn't mention His name, so what." Dude you do not even read the Torah correctly, at least your consistent! The first commandment of Sinai opens with the Name of HaShem!!!!" Yes, I agree with that.""" Next you write: """His true name, (י ה ו הR36;)R36;, is mentioned. That was my point.""" Where in the New Testament or the Koran is this Divine Name written? NO WHERE. Therefore the new testament avoda zara and the Koran avoda zara worship other Gods. Next you write, you do not "say" - fundamental error. ""Yes, other gods is in the plural (אלהים אחרים), but it doesn"t mean they exist!"" That's what you write. The people who worship Zeus and Thor they reject your arrogance. """Brit Milah was just an example. As I said, he circumcised himself and his servants.""" Please pull your pants up. Brit melah came no less than 13 years after the brit ha'batarim. Next you write ""He did not make a promise with spiritual children, but a physical descendants, that"s the whole point of the chapter! G-d promises Abraham future children!"" Bunk. The brit bein ha'batarim teaches the faith of O'lam Ha'ba and the resurrection of the dead! ""I didn't bring up the Documentary Hypothesis because I beleive it, on the contrary! It"s garbage theology! You misunderstood my point."" YOU brought up worthless garbage not at all connected to the discusson! This represents the point i made both then and now