Larztheloser Should be "Knighted" With the Official Title "Beast Slayer"

Ok firstly, I told you stop referring to me as “Her” & and “she”; I indicated that I didn’t like this, but you still continued on multiple counts to do so. It has to stop!1. 9spaceking’s B.S. Theory- this was made up and fallacious.So, in the last round, my opponent had provided a “message pasting” which he deemed would be seen as the evidence which would show that you die a horrible death from losing a debate and that you quickly regenerates afterwards- to justify that Larztheloser has slain many beasts. This is completely a lie! My opponent says that I have made a baseless accusation against him in which I said that those message that he pasted, were fake. Well my friends, I can confirm that my opponent’s pastings were indeed 100% fake after speaking to a number of people of relevant to this matter. They all confirmed that they never had such a conversation with my opponent * coughs (Airmax). This is substantial evidence that my opponent is lying and therefore his argument is invalid. Unfortunately, a certain person said that I cannot paste the conversations that I had with the people at hand, or I would get in trouble. You think that I am lying? If I am lying about what I have said, may he smite me where I stand? I decided to pray to God, and then all of a sudden, he appeared on DDO, so I messaged him: As you can see, he says that you don’t die after losing a debate and that you would regenerate anyway. This is proof that debunks the B.S. Theory thus rendering my opponents argument useless.2. Airmax does not have the authority to knight anyone Airmax has power over DDO. But regardless, He does not have power to give a knighthood nor any title. As I have said before, only that of a royal status etc could be able to give a knighthood and title. If Airmax role-played out a knighthood with Larz, this would not be a real knighthood and Larz would not receive any title either; Larz would not be able to receive any title. Please note that the title says ... “Official title of Beast Slayer”. Larz could not receive this title due to the fact that one cannot be knighted with the title “beast slayer” because it is not an official title for ay eligible knighthood. Conclusion= Larz cannot be knighted by Airmax and he would not be able to receive the title of “beast slayer” from anyone.3. 9spaceking’s adaption of my argumentIn round four of this debate, my opponent raised the issue of him adapting my argument but did not address this matter. The matter still lies at hand that my opponent had adapted my main argument intentionally but does not deny or accept this. In round 3, my opponent had presented his adaptation of my argument in which he presented a syllogism which had a different structure and was different in wording – this in effect, would make my argument seem less effective and strong. My opponent said that he was “trying to clear things up”. If you were only trying to clear up my argument, why not just declare so in that same round and just condense the wording? Not change the arguments syllogisms. Why Larz the loser cannot be knighted with the title of “beast slayer” In Lars’s lifetime, he would only be eligible for two types of knighthood- neither of which would give the title of “beast slayer”. There is also the matter the he shouldn’t receive any title of “beast slayer” due to the fact that he has not violently killed any beasts; or in this case, the aforementioned debaters (as debunked above). A figure such as Airmax wouldn’t be able to give a title or knighthood (as shown above). Therefore, in no such circumstance should Larztheloser be knighted with the title of “beast slayer”. The resolution is negated. Conclusion: I have shown that my opponent did in fact in lie and produced fake evidence to support his arguments. With this, his argument would be made baseless. If he wasn’t lying, I have provided proof to negate it anyway. My opponent had indeed presented and changed my argument intentionally. My opponent has not refuted the fact that only certain bodies of highest power can give knighthoods/titles. My opponent has not negated the fact that “beast slayer” is not an official knighthood title. I have shown that a figure such as Airmax would not be able to give any knighthood; therefore, Lars would not be able to be knighted by Airmax etc. I have negated my opponent’s argument that Larz has slain many “beasts” (my opponent went with beasts being “high-skilled debaters”). I have negated my opponent’s B.S. theory (Beast slayer theory). The B.S theory does not work. I have rebutted all of my opponent’s arguments. My opponent has not fulfilled his BOP I have fulfilled the small amount of BOP which my opponent said I had. I have met the criteria to win this debate. This debate has been very interesting indeed... I need to go lie down now... Vote Me!To Lars, you were the star.