A book is not worth reading unless someone wants to ban it

RebuttalR1) CON asks me to give an example of how a ban on a book necessitates it being popular, even though I have already given an example through popular New Age books being banned by some Christian groups in the prior round.Here's an example of a Christian protest against New Age beliefs in general, and how some seek a ban on them (and I would imagine any written materials about them) in public schools under the auspices of separation of church and state: (http://www.npr.org...)R2) I want to note that I need not provide evidence of bans, but only of evidence that people WANT to ban certain titles for whatever reason. I do believe the below sentiments uphold that particular burden.R3) CON also states that he provided a list of the "top ten best-selling/ most popular books of 2014," without referencing exactly what this list is, so I simply do not know what he is talking about. To use his specific examples:1) "Frozen" (which I assume to mean literary renditions of the Disney movie)This is easy. Some Christian conservatives decry the godlessness in a movie like "Frozen", and some of the more extreme sects of Christianity would seek to ban consumption of Disney products to protest such, which is fully within their constitutional rights. (http://www.theamericanconservative.com...) Personally, I've attended a Christian school where Michael Jackson was banned because "Thriller" was seen as satanic.Then, there's controversy about apparent gay advocacy in "Frozen" - anti-LGBT rights groups would seek to ban such a title under such grounds too:(http://www.huffingtonpost.com...)2) "Dr. Seuss"Bans on Dr. Seuss: (http://drseussbanned.weebly.com...)3) "The fault in our stars"I'm not familiar with this title. As it is, guess what? There's controversy over it: (http://www.mtv.com...). Groups that advocate for the end of unfair discrimination against cancer patients would then seek to boycott such a title until the controversial aspects are removed.4) "Divergent"I'm not familiar with this either, but apparently someone thinks it's been banned somewhere:http://www.bannedlibrary.com...http://www.bannedlibrary.com...5) Newton's 'Principia Mathematica'More extreme antiscience groups (http://en.wikipedia.org...) may indeed seek for a ban on Newton's theories.6) CON: "No one is ever going to ban an English textbook, so is an English text book or any other example of a text book not worth reading?"Well, this is easy. I've learned a couple foreign languages, and in some of those classes and environments under stricter instructors, any books written in English and any spoken English in general is banned to encourage the use of the language being learned. Obviously this would apply to English textbooks as well. This ban obviously stems from the popularity of using English between English speaking people. =)Don't get me wrong, those bans are rarely if ever successful, lol. Still, a ban is a ban, regardless of how effective the ban is.Conclusion I thank CON for the opportunity to engage in this interesting exercise. As it is, a cursory google search typing in the various titles he mentioned coupled with "controversy" or "banned" provided the links to the above sources, and my round took less than an hour to construct.The invariable link between popularity and controversy is inescapable. My syllogism from round #1 stands:p1 - If a book is popular, then it is worth reading.p2 - If someone wants to ban a book, it is because the book is popular.c - Therefore, if someone wants to ban a book, it is worth reading. The resolution is upheld.