Atheism Evolution vs Creation by God

Thanks!VideosI gave several reasonable explanations as to how wheels could have ended up in the sea in that area.Lol, telling me to "pick one" isn't really an option right now. You're asserting that because we have trees that are standing up through years of sediment, God created the world and it's been around for only a few thousand years. I'm giving reasonable explanations as to how this can be possible. Although neither can be definitive 100% "proof," it's up to scientists and geologists and archaeologists and others to determine what's the current most reasonable idea, and the theory that through volcanic ash, erosion, sediment build up, earthquakes, other natural events, the trees managed to be held up through the years, seems to be more reasonable and favours evolution more than creationism.Yes, erosion explains how the ground around the trees can break away or cause the trees to fall/sink into the Earth, while staying upright. This is a perfectly reasonable explanation.Some material forming around the trees can hold them upright. The trees can sink deeper into the Earth. There are many things that can cause trees to stay upright through layers of geological columns, and hey sure, water could be one, however this doesn't mean that there was a flood that covered the entire Earth.Rock...Have you ever heard of a "comparison"? I gave an example of water flowing through a rock, showing that it's completely natural for this to happen, and it can be possible for a geyser to form on a grand scale, splitting a rock in half. You saying "look, a natural event!" Does not prove God or creation, or disprove evolution.Red SeaNo historical record? So other than the Bible (a book filled with metaphors, a lot used to simply be life lessons or good moral values to live by), there's no historical record saying billions of gallons of water were pushed apart by an unknown force. I want to believe this can happen, however it is completely impossible according to our understanding of logic, science, gravity, reality, etc. I'm giving other possibilities as to what could have caused a bunch of stuff to float to a point in the bottom of the sea because this is my stance in the debate... to give other explanations as to what could have caused something that you claim to be a miracle or God or something religious. "Why are they there?" - Well why is anything in the sea? Stuff gets dumped or finds its way to the bottom of the ocean floors, I'm sure you could find rabbit bones and wolf bones and steel and metal and other stuff too. Does that mean there was a rabbit-wolf sword fight down there too?QuantumI've given you probably a dozen reputable sites backing me up on my theory of an expanding universe. You want facts yet your "facts" are "this one part in the Bible makes sense, therefore it is all 100% truth." I also gave you several sites that support the theory of evolution.If you're not satisfied with my previous sites regarding an expanding universe, here's a few more...http://skyserver.sdss.org...http://arxiv.org...http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov... http://www.aip.org... http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu... https://cosmology.carnegiescience.edu... Macro evolution can't be "proved" in the sense where we can witness it happening, as it takes hundreds of thousands if not millions of years, however the evidence does support this theory very well, as I've shown in my previous reply. There's hardly any evidence that supports your biblical theory to be more reasonable than my scientific theory.NothingYou claimed that "something can't come from nothing." I claimed that there is always something, even if it doesn't look like anything is there, in other words, nothing doesn't exist, as there is something in place of what you consider to be "nothing." Great, this argument didn't get anywhere considering you wouldn't believe me (even though I gave great evidence, such as this [1]) that your idea of "nothing" doesn't exist.EvolutionI explained how reasonable it is to understand that we all came from a common ancestor and evolved in different ways from one another, along with scientific studies and information to back that up with. The DNA codes are different because the environment and that species' adaptation to that environment caused the DNA codes to change. You make an assertion that something cannot happen, yet when I explain how it is possible that it can, and I show how people have done experiments and studies on it, you just say "no evidence" (which I'm assuming the only type of "evidence" you want would be a video of a dog changing into something that isn't a dog...) and not even consider what I'm showing you. I don't know what kind of evidence you want, I've given you enough evidence that supports the idea that everything has evolved from a common ancestor billions of years ago, which makes a lot more sense than "everything appeared at once."Kind to KindYou have absolutely no idea what evolution even means, and it shows. It's not the current types of species turning into different current types of species, it's something evolving in separate ways, and as of now, a couple of those things would be, say, fish and sharks. If we're talking about from the very beginning, the very start of life, if it did start in the ocean, that one type of organism would mutate in millions of different ways as it reproduces or replicates, and eventually turning into what we have today.I gave evidence that supports the idea of what I'm arguing. You can't prove anything related to God with science, evidence, or logic... I actually did explain mine, even if you don't consider the evidence to be enough or if you don't accept the science as it is, the logic works. So if anything, that's 1/3 for me, and 0/3 for you. My theory is still more logical than yours at the very least.I do have evidence. I have evidence that supports this idea. I obviously don't have a video or even reason to believe something that doesn't even fall into the category of what evolution is. But I showed you the evidence that supports my idea. You keep asking for "evidence," yet I have no idea what kind of evidence you want. It seems like all you'll accept (considering I provided dozens of links to reputable sites with scientists and geologists and archaeologists and astronomers have done experiments on) would be like videos or something of specifically a dog turning into a lion... I gave reason to believe the Earth is more than 6,000 years old, and you couldn't defend that very well at all.All you've said is "no, you haven't provided the exact evidence I want," even though the "evidence" you provided that "supports" your creation theory can hardly be considered evidence at all, or even be related to anything biblical or miraculous.Thanks a bunch for the debate, I'm hoping you learned something, as I know I did![1]