Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito are innocent of the murder of Meredith Kercher

You used TJMK for your sole source[4]? I should have made the limit higher, so I'll rebut the points against AK here and RS in another round. I have abbreviated your points for conciseness. I'll also have to push any of my additional arguments to a later round. Amanda Knox (AK) Rebuttals:1. Accused a completely innocent man After at least 14 hours of non-stop interrogation she imagined a scenario which placed Patrick at the scene. However, she also the day after the interview rescinded this scenario citing her confusion[5]. When coercive interrogations take place in a foreign country, in a foreign language with lack of sleep and food such confusion is rampant. See the central jogger case for an example of false confessions[2]. In fact, this is why both European and Italian law requires electronic recording to prevent police abuses and coercive confessions[3]. This is also why the original confession (not the later handwritten note) was barred from trial.2. AK/Meredith’s DNA mixed in five different places This is irrelevant. DNA from AK in common areas is expected especially in high traffic areas like a bathroom.3. Early morning computer activity shows someone wasn’t asleep until 10:30Irrelevant. This proves nothing regarding guilt.4. Multiple witnesses testified that AK and RS were at the squareMr. Curatolo did testify to that during the original trial [1]. But, during the appeals trial he told the court, "The two youngsters were talking intensely to each other. .. that night young people in masks were coming and going and buses were leaving for the nightclubs. "[6] However, there were no buses running or clubs open that night and no one was in masks since it was the day after Halloween. If you are instead referring to Nara Capazelli and Antonella Monacchia, then in all likelihood they also mixed up there dates, as reported in Oggi[7]. 5. AK was seen at a convenience store at 7:45 am the next morningThe testimony shows that Quintavelle said someone vaguely similar to AK was at the store and yet oddly when questioned a few days after the murder did not mention this [1]. An employee of the store testified that they did not see AK on that day. 6. AK rang MK's mobile telephones to check on MKIrrelevant. My guess is she rang to check on her, got VM and hung up. My own phone records show such calls. 7. AK knew details of body and wounds despite not being in line of sight Evidence? Source? 8. AK lied about drug intake that night and is contradicted by RS's own diarySo? How is that relevant?9. AK wrote a 2,900 word email home as an alibi. Speculation and irrelevant. 10. Cellphone records show Knox did not stay in Sollecito's flat Evidence for this? The Massei Report states, “ no other [use] was shown for the day of 1.11.07. .. "[1]. Even if I accepted that the cellphone records showed this (which they don’t), cellphone records prove nothing. 11. The fact that AK's table lamp was used to examine the murder scene. A black light wouldn’t be very helpful in a cleanup so I’m not sure why you even brought it up. [1]12. AK's inexplicable reaction after shown the knife drawer at the girl's cottage. Irrelevant. Con has thrown everything against the wall hoping something will stick. All his points have been lifted from a website with an extreme bias. If Con has any original arguments, I’d love to hear them. [1] . http://www.beforeyoutakethatpill.com...[2] . http://www.csmonitor.com... [3] . http://www.ecba-eaw.org...[4] . http://www.zimbio.com...[5] . http://www.telegraph.co.uk...'s-note.html[6] . http://www.guardian.co.uk...[7] . http://blog.seattlepi.com...