Homosexual Behavior Is Wrong.

You gave minimal evidence for the existence of God, and failed to explain on universal standards why your version of the Christian God is an accurate representation of the Supreme Being.'I think the faiths that match with this best are the Abrahamic religions. I like Judaism because it describes a God like the one I've already discovered so far'Neither I nor the spectators particularly care about your personal religious beliefs in the parameters of this debate, since it is not universal. All you succeeded in doing was winning a non-argument with yourself about which of the thousands of deities and millions of methods of worship fits your personal views the best, along with a half-baked avec vous-même debate about what the Bible means in the passage provided.And don't bother using the Bible as evidence, since it is not universally accepted. This is not a website for Christian debate, and according to the parameters you set out, this debate is not Christian. The Bible is worth as much as evidence for a secular debate about homosexuality as The City and the Pillar or Morrissey's autobiography.I didn't provide a sustantial religious argument for homosexuality because I have no real argument to make. I have no religion, therefore no religious opinion on bedroom etiquette.You seem to brush away my Mosaic prohibitions casually, as though they do not matter, dismissing them as 'details from the Mosaic law like dietary restrictions'. You then go on to say that we are not intended to live by those laws, and that you were only framing the biblical definition of homosexual behaviour, which is not even an argument, as the title of the debate is not: 'Homosexuality is accurately defined in Leviticus 18:22, Romans 1:26-28 and Timothy 1:10 in the ESV'.Your argument from a body-altering perspective only applies to defining homosexual behaviour as 'anal sex', which is rather prevalent among the heterosexual community as well (1). Also, anal sex in and of itself is not dangerous or body-altering, provided adequate measures are taken, such as the use of a water-based lubricant and of a condom (2). Oral sex among men is, again, made safe through either condom use or both partners being free of STIs (3). That just leaves non-penetrative sex which is almost completely risk-free, and are carried out by both communities.Your first argument is irrelevent, your second is inaccurate; but your third is positively stupid. Homosexuality is present among 1,500 animal species, including lions, dolphins, orca whales and man's close relative, the chimpanzee (4). Besides, who cares what an alien from Alpha Centauri would think about our actions? Humans do thousands of actions every day that would seem odd to an outside observer, but they are accustomed to the actions and therefore do not perceive them as strange. Living in a tolerant society is different to brainwashing and indoctrinating, and has a wholly positive effect. There is not a single negative consequence of treating everybody in the same manner.(1) http://www.huffingtonpost.com...;(2) http://www.nhs.uk...(3) http://www.nhs.uk...(4) http://www.news-medical.net...Are you going to post any actual arguments in the next round?