christ never stated one damn word about being gay nor transgender.

Yadda yadda yadda about the apostles writing the bible when you have 0 proof of jesus even existing. http://www.youtube.com... - jesus wasn"t jesus (Aron Ra) http://www.youtube.com... - The True Core of the jesus Myth (Christopher Hitchens) http://www.youtube.com... - Did jesus Exist? http://www.youtube.com... - Why christianity is Unreasonable (Richard Carrier) http://www.youtube.com... - Biggest Lie - The fourth gospel ("The first striking revision in the 4th gospel is that the ministry of jesus has ballooned out from from one year to three. The writers not only make a reference not only from one but to three distinct passover festivals. Now was this just a tradition that some early christians held to a three year ministry and others to a one year ministry? Can anyone honestly maintain that whole dialogues could be remembered word for word for many decades and yet believers have no common agreement whether these words were said during one year or during three years?") Um duh. Do you REALLY THINK jesus existed? http://www.youtube.com... - The Gospel According to Carrier (Richard Carrier states jesus may have possibly existed, but scrap all the mythology) http://www.youtube.com... - Proving the Historicity of Jesus? Tracie and David http://www.youtube.com... - What did jesus do for you? And here"s some proof as to who wrote the gospels" http://www.youtube.com... - Who wrote the gospels? http://www.youtube.com... - Stephanie Thompson vs Matt Dillahunty, or how not to debate an Atheist! (this is hilarious as Stephanie is remarkably ignorant and stupid beyond belief skip to the 6:00 mark) "I will speak only in terms of the book of Matthew" Well that right there is a grave fallacy. Prove that what you are reading/ interpreting is correct, NOTHING is established in scripture. That"s because the christian god, if remotely intelligent in which he is clearly not, would never use text as a source of communication, the worst form of communication possible so everybody can get it wrong as there"s been 0 updates in at least 2,000 years. There"s translations upon translations upon translations upon translations upon copies upon copies upon copies upon copies upon dead languages upon dead langanguages with absolutely 0% of a chance to trance it back to the original. And there"s no original in the first place! So absolutely nobody is interpreting correctly. http://www.youtube.com... - Christians don't understand the character of God "If god is all knowing and he knows the future of all events and he wrote a book that can only be interpreted as if it endorses slavery and if its heinous violence against your children against your neighbors" how could a god be that omnipotent and devise a book where we can"t distinguish between the law of Israel and god"s law? I mean their interwoven where we have metaphor and fact and nobody can distinguish the two. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take figuratively. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take literally. Was it actually a tree? I mean come on. How can anyone distinguish this. I mean come on. It doesn"t make any sense. It doesn"t matter how its translated. It doesn"t matter what version. If it was written by an omnipotent being there would be ONE VERSION. And there would be only ONE WAY to interpret it because it would be written well." Aron Ra Actually it wouldn"t be written at all. What"s wrong with your god comin" down and talking to people? "Hey you know some of that stuff that"s in the book? I"m here to correct it." Matt Dillahunty http://www.youtube.com... -The god that christians believe in is amazingly STUPID!!!!"We have to rely on copies of copies of anonymous authors with no originals and the textural testimony to a miracle for example, there"s no amount of reports, anecdotal reports that is sufficient to justify in believing that actually happened as reported. And anything that would qualify as a god would clearly understand this and if it wanted to clearly convey this to people in a way that is believable would not be relying on ---TEXT--- to do so. And this to me is the nail in the coffin for christianity. The god that christians believe in is amazingly ---STUPID---!!! If it actually wants to achieve its goal by spreading its word to humanity by relying on text, by relying on languages that die off, by relying on anecdotal testimony, that"s not a pathway to truth. And anything that would qualify for a god would know this.which shows either god does not exist or doesn"t care enough about the people to understand the nature of evidence to actually present it. Now which of those two possibilities is accurate?" Matt Dillahunty "If jesus and Muhammad and abraham and moses had never been born, which in any case I tend to dabble, if all their stories were untrue were suddenly found and everyone had to admit it some people I know would show panic. Now what would we do? We"d have no morals suddenly. What could be more nonsensical than that? As the matter of fact the position that we occupy would---be---precisely---the---same as it is now if none of these texts had ever been written, as if none of these lacerations had ever been made. We would still have to reason together about how how to treat one another, about how to build a just city, and about how to have irony and a sense of humor." Christopher Hitchens "with this in mind let us jump into the words of Jesus." And those were which have strangely changed and been updated with each translation and language barrier so you truly as a reader has no idea as to what jesus said even if you could possibly prove in any way by a miracle click and a snap of your fingers that he ever existed. Wow. Yep that"s an invented excuse if there ever was one. And there"s no consensus between the 30,000 or so variations of christianity to make matters all the worse for you and your tribe. "Like any document the verses in the Bible are best read in the context of the book/chapter." Yes I 100% agree with you. And that is why, speaking in general only, that atheists know the bible better than christians do. Google it. Um no, you know what I use is a TON of websites. I"m not glued to just one to get my asphyxiation to be glued to the doormat. Well that"s news to me that I cited Matthew 19 : 4- 6. "Now let's analyze this passage, and it will tell us a lot about Jesus' view point." Really? According to what? You? How would you know? What grade of fake plastic dog vomit odiferious odere" le classe muy muy grande" did you pass to come up with that one. I mean you may think it all you want. But there"s 0% of an explanation from your jesus anywhere in your bible about jesus"s "viewpoint". Strike 1 for inventing a flat out excuse in a true meager attempt to save your sorry you know where areas to burn from a fiery fling of arrogance and stupidity. If you give me 2 more of them, this debate will be over instantly. DO NOT GUESS. KNOW what you are talking about, present ACTUAL evidence or don"t present it at all. The next verse to be analyzed is Matthew 15:18-20. It reads: "But the things that come out of a person's mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart comes evil thoughts - murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them." See? That"s not what it reads. In fact not even close. KJV "But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man. 19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies: 20 These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man." Now figure out the BIG difference. Someone CHANGED what your christ said along the way. Either from the KJV version to whatever version your barfed upped, or from the version you barfed upped to the KJV. Who in their right minds would change what jesus aqnd or god would say? And to constantly update what these characters, and or any character would say = how does ANYONE know what they said? = not a chance in this universe. Which is yet another reason why YOUR god in which you cannot even prove exists would NEVER use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible. "The thought of this passage is simple it's not what we..." Whoa there kiddo who is this "we"? Um no its you, only you and you missed half the planet, women are not mentioned in these verses at all now are they? Nope. So naturally they are exempt from these verses - right?. continuing "intake that actually degrades our souls but how we act accordingly. Included in that list is sexual immorality, which homosexuality falls under." and your jesus never stated it. So POOF bang, it doesn"t count. You can"t go off interpreting on---your---own. "Now this is the baseline of my argument. Jesus spoke about homosexuality and the distinction of the two genders." Ab-so-lu-te-ly. Not. god did. Not jesus. Picture this, you back in that time and you were to hear those verses, would YOU thus believe that those who were gay would be included within those verses? If so then you would be the bigger idiot than the frog marching his dildo across the pond. And to make matters worse, there"s no "why". It is what it is. Just because YOU think its immoral, and because jesus barks in his whiny ringtones, I"d be willing to bet that if jesus were to tell you to become a Nazi, you would most certainly do it because like here, he gave you his "word" and nothing else as your inferno of gullibility sets in. I"m out of space.