Gary Johnson should never be president

Initially, the outline and formatting of the negation side of this debate should be understood beforehand. The negation will follow the following basic outline for all 5 rounds of the debate, during the debate, there will also be cross-examination periods, dispute, clarification, and supporting periods during each round, but the basic outline is as follows: 1) Opening Statement/Acceptance 2) Affirmation Constructive Speech 3) Rebuttal Speech I 4) Rebuttal Speech II 5) Closing Statement Therefore, the affirmation will start this debate with an opening statement and acceptance of the debate. The negation position clearly invalidates the resolution "Gary Johnson Should Never be President". The libertarian party candidate, Gary Johnson once stated, "A wasted vote is voting for someone you don"t believe". This shows that one of the choices for the presidency for this year should be the strong individual Gary Johnson who will help in this great country of the United States of America. Gary Johnson is simply an American businessman, author, and politician who is the running Libertarian party nominee and also serves as the 29th governor of New Mexico. This means that Gary Johnson is an eligible candidate for the presidency of this year, he deserves as much respect as his opponents Donald Trump from the Republican Party, Hillary Clinton from the Democratic Party, and less likely Jill Stein from the Green Party. Some people may believe that just because he is an unlikely nominee from an unlikely to win the presidential party, that he should NEVER be a president in this great country, such as the affirmation side, but why could he not be a president, why should he not be respected? After all, he is part of politics and wants to promote change in this countries problem it currently faces. If we were to respect Johnson we would truly understand the true change he wants in this country, he would like to promote change, just as Trump, Clinton, or even Stein would also do. Take Trump, for example, his most famous argument is the ultimate building of a border wall between Mexico and the United States, and this proves that he would like to promote change. Johnson may also want to promote this change as well, or something even better, that may help this country's immigration. Some people may disrespect Trump"s views, and some may disrespect Clinton"s or Stein"s, and this may go for disrespect for Johnson, which is completely incorrect. The affirmation will provide 5 contentions to support their argument. Firstly, all must understand how Donald Trump"s campaign is incorrect and is proving ineffective in the long run. Secondly, all must understand how Hillary Clinton"s campaign is incorrect and is proving ineffective in the long run. Thirdly, all must understand how the Libertarian party should hold respect for the potential positivity that they will provide in the future. Fourthly, all must understand how disrespect towards the Libertarian party is incorrect and their opinions should be acknowledged. And finally, all must understand the positivity Johnson"s campaign will provide in the country. Therefore, the framework in this debate is whoever does a better job of protecting the understanding for the positive aspect of the government in this country and creates an ultimate understanding of respect towards politicians in the Libertarian party, shall win this debate. The negation side truly and dearly accepts this debate and it"s arguments, opponent, and outcome. This side will fight hard and truly, but respect the opponents on the affirmation side as well. SOURCES: http://www.azquotes.com... (first quote, the one with the picture)