Video Games are a primary source of violence

I like your passion. I was cowering from my seat as I read your intense deep-seated argument. I had to go back to Amnesia just to make sure that the gatherers were much scarier than yours. LOLViolence and Aggression are closely akinCon states that I acknowledged my opinion as fact without evidence whilst also building up his case based on his father. What are we supposed to take as more credible? Your father(To clarify, I'm sure he is a good man ahah) or Sports Violence? You've essentially said fans are violent, display aggressive behaviors et cetera. Your own case supplements mine whilst proving nothing of your denunciation. It serves to prove my case in that Aggression leads to violence. The evidence of racist, verbal, crazy fans whom usually associates with clogging the pitch with bananas are obviously more credible as a case for violence than a feeble interpretation of his parents' behavior. Moreover, all my case are linked to each other(1.)The GAM model proves that aggressive personality over long term causes serious mental issues often leading to violence.(2.)Bandura's study was children's imitation of their center of attention, thus endorsing both GAM and "Violence & Aggression" point(3.)EEG scans of several studies show a correlation between aggression and violenceCon seems to think my opinion is not driven by evidence but it clearly says otherwise. EEG scans are clearly objective, they forecast something similar to that of heart rate monitors. The only difference is that EEG measures the brain by looking at wavelengths[14.http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org...]. In addition to that, Bandura Ross & Ross's study was objective because the 2 conditions(Aggressive & non-aggressive) are met leaving no room for bias interpretations. GAM model has over 33 independent tests as well as 17 additional ones, all of which endorses the theory. Not even a single test refutes the hypothesis.Compare with Con's case, the majority of what he claims to be objective seems to come from youtube celebs who are gamers themselves. How do you expect them to be objective and value free when their way of life is gaming? all they did was to use politicians as scapegoats to justify their opinion. This is beyond reasonable doubt, even beyond primary source. Next, Con cites a scholastic website, where it says violence is heterogeneous. Obviously it is, the question is whether aggression leads to violence. Violence is the action of an aggression as stated previous rounds. The websites characterize severe cases as violence, such as vandalism and alcohol, an act of aggression isn't violence. My opponent resorts to semantics by refuting definitions to garner an easy win. Semantics is a piss poor way of arguing. Con accuses Bandura Ross & Ross over ageism, claiming age nullifies any experiment beyond the sample range. On what grounds? a blatant assertion without evidence. A 12 year old may not develop intelligence properly due to Autism or whatever Disorder you may list, you have to assess IQ to refute my argument, which you did not. An assertion without evidence does not qualify as a contention.Effects of video games on violence are psychologically provenSo? I didn't say otherwise. You can classify games as whatever you want, whats important is its viewer base and its ability to be representative. Games are different than Movies, so what, you're telling me that there's an alternate ending to Titanic?. Con did not refute my argument and instead classified it as a sport which....doesn't prove his case or disprove my case whatsoever.Befo======================ConcessionAt this moment, I have issues to attend to, I didn't realize 5 rounds could be that long. I hereby forfeit all of my arguments. Please Vote Con. Ignore my arguments, if you chose not to, then at least read it with heavy prejudice in favor of my opponent.Please award all points to Con. Thanks for the debate. I am really sorry problems sprang up at this very moment causing a terrible derailment of our debate.I will not be available on DDO so all future rounds will state as forfeiture. Sorry for wasting your time , especially having to wait 2 more rounds saying "Opponent FF" and that work you've done =(.So PLEASEVOTE CON(Dishoungh) due to Concession.