I am the best debater on Debate.org

Well its Christmas for me and its Christmas for most people. When you say this, I honestly feel like you're excluding or at least avoiding Christmas and I never heard of "Kwanzaa" meaning that it's a rare holiday. People who celebrate rare holidays don't think that they're holiday is considered when one says something as vague as "Holiday". In short you lose the big group and the minority. In any case this don't matter. I have observed that my opponent has simply misunderstood my arguments. Hence I'll quote and respond to what you said to show everyone where you went wrong. Besides this is my favorite way of using the last round. AFT(argument from time): "Okay, I'll agree with the definition" I'm afraid it's too late to quarrel definitions, anyhow. "you are saying that I am not a debater." I've set up two definitions: 1."debater- someone that debates" That is an adjective (description). 2." A person who is debating" That is a verb (an action word). "Yes, I AM debating. I AM a debater." Yes under the first definition but not under the second one because at this moment its me who is debating. We are arguing the second definition and under the second definition 'the present time' has passed away for it was at the moment you posted this. " I believe that you are forfeiting this debate, placing a desperate card, or trying to lure me into a complicated trap." No I presented effort and crafted my own splendid argument. This is completely made by me. "There is many people in front of me" Not at the time you posted this ! At that moment all records of the past and all potential of the future was destroyed and you were in fact the only debater ; you were the only debater who debated at the 'present time'. Furthermore there was no opposition instead there was only you and your argument. We established that the title was specifically referring to the "present time" that is when by our established definition you were the only debate hence you were the best. Yes I know this may be a bit difficult to understand but read what I wrote few times (it's not a lot) and you'll get it easily though I do realize that many can get it from the first time. I urge readers to read round two again and you'll see how badly my argument is misunderstood. There is nothing extra I can add though I don't get the "Questions and Answers" section of yours. "Q.No argument" I don't understand the question but by your answer I realized that it would be meritless. For those who don't know what is going on: In round 2 I argued that: o By our established definition my opponent was referring to the moment he posted this debate. o By our established definition a debater is someone who debates but due to the previous establishment and another definition we established, a debater is "A person who is debating.". I have established and proven in round 2 that we must use the latter definition for it is more appropriate. o When you add the previous two points, you can see that for one to be a better debater than Ethopia619 one must be debating at the exact same time and be making better arguments. My opponents arguments have met no opposition hence it succeeds ergo it can't be anyone in the middle of a debate. o There were no other challenges posted at that time hence he was the best debater for that short amount of time. The title as established is referring to that period of time so technically you are the best debater however one must remember the context (what I just wrote) for this to make sense. o Hypothetically if there were more debates in a "challenging period" present, it is impossible to have both of these posted at the same time. Since according to our definition we must be exact (emphasis on exact) the possibility of this happening is definitely under one percent. The chances decrease when one considers the size of this tiny community. I hope this helped everyone to understand. AFI(argument from ignorance): "I do not have multiple accounts. If I did, I would have been banned a long time ago, but, I do not have multiple accounts." No this pure assertion does not prove that you can't get away with having multiple accounts. "I obviously am not just an internet account. Who types these arguments?" This supports my suspicions as you can see: "Q. It doesn't increase the Ethopia619 accounts win ratio. A. We are talking about the "debater". Debater is a reference to a person and not an internet account." " I do not conceal my skills. I go all out with all my strength" Assertion. Burden not met. "I chose a Yami Yugi picture for my profile, to show that I will go all out, just like Atem (Yami Yugi)" I don't have to believe this nor did you always have this avatar ; does that mean that you don't bother when you use a different avatar ? Obviously no ; such trivial things don't effect how the debater acts. "Please look at Yraelz's profile" That is irrelevant to both AFI and AFT. Chief note: You completely ignored the third doubt I had "3. You're the best around" Thank you for the debate, V0Antras