BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
DDO's 2nd Grand Video Rap Battle Tourney TUF VS REN Round 1!

http://www.youtube.com... On the mic I’m demonic, when I vomit It’s like comets cometh when I drop it Cop it and knock it in your ear sockets Then watch it pop your drums like sonic rockets Clearly, you’re Too Ugly to Front -- Obscured your pic so I won’t mock it This dude knows that I’d burn him He looks like a blonde Pee-Wee Herman Better stay over there with the Mormons Before that breezy’s head’s turnin’ Cute smile, I’ll have that torso curved, and Her chin to the sky, vagina gushin, learning New things about herself, chest burning Dude, I’ll slap you so you lose your last rotten tooth Now go on ahead and tell yourself the simple and sad truth To figure the winner, it won’t take an supersleuth Between Ren, who’s clearly not a giver And this silly shtt Ugly as Fvck young Tommy Hilfiger Who looks like a pedobear that eats glass for dinner Motherfvcker, this is true grit, knock you off when I’m full lit Stumbling drunk and spit hanging from my slurring lips And still steal your soul and walk away with a full clip Chuckling, cold, letting it happen slow as the blood drips Washing my mitts, learning the tricks from where OJ slipped It’s like your chest rips when the bass hits Like Mary-J-Velvet with some coke sprinkled in it Poking holes in your lungs while your toking it But you’re still holding it, You’re conflicted because you’re addicted Because I’m sick with it It’s like a joke when the beat and my words elope I try to cope, so I just smoke, then show you how Ren is dope
DDO's 2nd Grand Video Rap Battle Tourney TUF VS REN Round 1!

http://www.youtube.com... Rappin time.Yo, I don't see how this boy thinks he's got chance. Ima be tearin him up!Okay so it's just about time to get down,I'll be dissin up on REN, that fake @ss clown.lynchin' him becuase im mafia, he's the town.I'll send him on his way home; eastbound.I notice on your Profile, that you've got no winsI'll make sure it stays that way' while I kick you in the shins.This rap was over befor it even began,Get out now, and make room for the man.TUF is in the building ready to drop bombs, Tearin up this battle like I'm livin in the palms.Ima bout ready to eat you up and spit you outToss you around until you scream and shout.Let me ask, do you really think you stand a chanceYou won't recover from this at first glance.I'll be shooting bullets at your feet. Dance b1tch dance.did you think I'd play this cute like lickdafoot? You see I've figured you out; read you like a book.I'll Change your gender and get you more pregant than snooks.But you see even here I'm playing with your mind.Because once you turn your back I'll attack you from behind.Boy you know I'd school you any time of the week. And I attribute that to that to your mind being weak.Because my rhymes smell fantastic, while yours just reek.And after I school you, a better opponent I will seek.You have nothing like I do to this callabre,Stand and watch as I deliver Ren this massacre.emacitor. Head lines, capacitor. I'll deliver my message like im the US embassador.You see, I'm lyrical, empirical, and ever tyrical,I will chew you up, spit you out, and stomp you flatthen I'll grab a broom, and casually sweep you under the mat.You aint cut out for this, this is fact.You see, your a baseball, I'm the bat.I've got more rhymes piled up then I can store,I'll Unleashing them on you, cuz your such a bore.Maybe now you can learn to entertain,As I introduce myself into the new rap hall of fame.Im the new rap religion, and your the first witness,To me controlling your mind is like my own game of tetris. You think you scared me off with that lame rap intro?Well try harder than that, im hotter than a jalepeno.Listen up because responding to me will be foolish,And Quite frankly, anything you throw at me is toolish.Here's your chance, you should just up and quit,Because After I'm done, you will just forgetAll of the rhymes that you were going to spit.
DDO's 2nd Grand Video Rap Battle Tourney TUF VS REN Round 1!

This will serve as my introduction And also function as a luncheon Somethin to attach to my endless gumption While I munch on TUF little cvnts in This fun little fisticuffs competition And clearly, that’s Ren for the win as a given And watch them call me a villain for grillin these children’sDon't get serious, seriously, I'm just kiddin just keep on over there, jillin your clit, and As forewarning, please flex the dialect Pull that shtt out as far as it’ll stretch If you expect respect, and not kids just pressing next Inspect my rhymes, read into every line and reflect Because, bttch, I’m a thriller, a natural born killer I’m Mafia, not the Miller, and tonight, I will deliver, Normally, I’m liberal, but rapping Ren’s no giver So, you better bite someone nice, because from me You’ll get not a sliver - kid - Because, you’re starving, but I’m hungry, and used to getting fed So, to your chagrin, this tournament you think that you’ve led Has drawn you into the open beartrap in my head And as my teeth snap, let’s see how quickly you’re dead…...I'm in rapper mode too.
DDO's 2nd Grand Video Rap Battle Tourney TUF VS REN Round 1!

Yeah this is really going down right now! The epic video rap battle between two DDO users with 3 letters in their usernames. This will be the most epeic rap battle in the history of DDO so I hope ya'll are ready for this, because things are about to get REAL son.Accept my challenge... If you dare! We shall post video's in rounds 2-4 of this debate.Good luck to my opponent, and let's take this battle and turn it into a philosophy! (that didn't have to make sense, because everything I am saying sounds legit, because I am in rapper mode!) Let's do this.
Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions

Okay, that was a very good argument.I commend my opponent on a great job tackling that point, I only wish he could have done this from the start.Although my opponent presents a good argument, I still have an issue with it and some counter-examples. My issue is that if humanity is to blame, and humanity will always be violent and hateful because of their nature, then the good things religion has caused cannot also be a product of humanity. I believe the bad things religion contributes outweigh the good, however there are still some good things religion has to offer. I argue that religion's sense of community and calming effect (since these people are coming together knowing they will go to heaven, a perfect place, so they worry about worldly struggles less) attribute to the inaction of many people. If religion was abolished, people wouldn't meet the same people they met through church, wouldn't be able to create bonds through community, and would be more stressed out. This could cause a variety of things such as more auto accidents (more stress means less sleep and less attentiveness), hostility between people, and many other things.My counter-examples are:1) BurkasI don't think there could be another reason besides religion that would make people dress their women like this. Burkas and veils only started popping up around the tenth century[1], exactly the time period when Islam was climbing in popularity towards its high point.[2]2) Churches and moneyThis is a very real, tangible effect of religion, as many churches were and continue to be built, which costs quite a bit. Furthermore, religions always want money. Ken Ham, for one project for his "creation museum", received 73 million dollars.[3] This is for one project. Imagine how much religion has spent over the entire course of its history! We certainly could have used that money, and I'd say that if religion were non-existent, we'd have a lot less debt in America and a lot more resources.3) Street preachingIf religion were taken away, people would not preach on the streets, because there would be nothing to preach about. I'd like to thank agnostic meatatarian for this debate. Sources:1. http://www.ehow.com...2. http://en.wikipedia.org...3. http://www.newsweek.com...;
Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions

"If you're saying that religion itself is not the influence, but human nature, and that if people were to cast aside religion, there would still be violence and flag burnings, etc. This is what the title and first argument of this debate make me believe it is about." Yes that is what I'm saying. P1: These people get their morality from scriptureP2: It is these people's conception of morality which causes them to do these thingsC1: If you take away these people's morality (i.e. their religion) they will no longer do these things. Your premises assume that they won't find another reason to do these things which is based on pure assumption. People get ridiculed all the time because they are different, so being gay, fat, mentally challenged or what I ever it is, people with differences get ridiculed and religion being taken from the equation doesn't change that. So even if you took religion away bigotry for sexual preference or any other reason will always be there. As for burning of flags people hate America and talk down on it all the time, even people in this country spit in its face. s://startthinkingright.files.wordpress.com...; alt="" width="1197" height="798" /> http://www.telegraph.co.uk... http://abcnews.go.com... http://www.dailymail.co.uk... Bigotry, women abuse, hatred for our fellow man for being different, and violence will always be and taking away religion won't change that simple fact. Religion is like an order by a man given to an assassin to do harm to another human being. Now one ever blames the order they blame the man who made it. Who are in this case the writers of the bible. Don't blame the order blame the man. Don't blame religion blame humanity.
Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions

Sorry for the confusion what I meant was if you take away religion the bigotry, burning of flags will still happen for different reasons. Now inanimate ideas can do no harm in and of themselves so if you can prove that they can then you will have made that point. As for the title, religion is not to blame for peoples actions just like if you made a written order for the killing of innocents you wouldn't say the order is to blame you would say the persons actions were.
Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions

Again you contradict yourself!You literally say "religion itself being an inanimate idea and ideology can do no harm." is the only thing you're trying to argue, then you say " by taking away religion violance, bigotry, burning of flags will still happen just for different possible reasons."Those are two different arguments.Again, if you are going with the first, the title of the debate is "Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions", which assumes that people are taking actions. Thereofe I call for an unfair debate because of a misleading title.If you are using the second argument, I've refuted it already, so rebut me if you'd like.Sorry for the big text and all, but I am a bit frustrated.
Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions

i do not see how my opening statement and argument title are misleading, please explain. Now here is simple logic proving relgion can do no harm. P1: Ideas or ideologies are nothing more then inanamate ideas. P2: Ideas or ideologies that are inanimate can do no harm. P3: Religion is an inamimate idea and idealogy. P4: Therefore religion can do no harm. That is all I'm trying to argue, not that religion can't give people a reason but that religion itself being an inanimate idea and ideology can do no harm. Many people have done evil regardless of religion, by taking away religion violance, bigotry, burning of flags will still happen just for different possible reasons. Will the people will always be a destructive lot no matter what the reason.
Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions

Okay, If this is truly your position you have mislead me with your debate title and opening argument. It is extremely obvious and self-evident that without people there is not even a religion to influence people. Nobody is dumb enough to not realize this. An ideology cannot go around burning flags, punching or killing people, etc. That would be like saying "Hunger is not to blame for people eating because if you take away the person, hunger by itself can't do anything." It can only influence people. However, your second example and latter half of the statement, although they do not match up with the first half of your argument, give me hope. If you're saying that religion itself is not the influence, but human nature, and that if people were to cast aside religion, there would still be violence and flag burnings, etc. This is what the title and first argument of this debate make me believe it is about. I will now argue the latter issue. All the pictures you see above are acts of violence, hatred, or discrimination (except the one with the kids). I argue that were you to take away religion, these people would not be doing these terrible acts. To prove this, I will use a simple logical argument.P1: These people get their morality from scriptureP2: It is these people's conception of morality which causes them to do these thingsC1: If you take away these people's morality (i.e. their religion) they will no longer do these things.It is pretty easy to confirm P1, as these people take the Bible/Quran as the word of god, and as such they will follow the rules and advice written in their book as if they were absolute.P2 is valid because, as we can see, if these people get their morality from scripture, which we have confirmed, they are told: "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death"[1], and "Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land."[2]Therefore if you detach their morals from scripture (eliminate religion), they will no longer see the need to do these terrible things to fellow man.Sources:1. http://biblehub.com...2. http://quran.com...
Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions

You actually proved my point without realizing it, what do those photos all have in common? People, people themselves do these things not religion. An ideology is not capable of committing disgusting acts but people are. Take away people from the equation and not only would you see that no harm will be done but religion itself won't exist in the first place. The only reason these things are happening are because of people. Religion is a tool nothing more it is not the problem people are, just like if you take away a gun you will still have people killing each other the same goes for religion. Regardless of religion people will always find an excuse to do harm to one another and religion is one of those excuses but it can't do harm since its only an idea. What does harm are the people who push what they believe by force, taking away a ideology won't change that people will always find an excuse to be destructive.
Religion itself is to blame for peoples actions

Hello, an interesting topic.I assume the BoP is on Con as he says that he will be showing, but I will also put some arguments out there.The Quran has caused much violence, war, and discrimination. Take a look at most modern Islamic countries after "Draw Muhammad Day" and this is what you'll find: and even worse, this: These things are all the result of religion, and although I do not need to prove that religion is to blame for people's bad actions, I thought I'd focus in on that for this round.The kids in the picture above could be playing in a sandbox, doing homework, reading, or listening to music, but instead they are part of a religious parade. These kids have no idea the depth of what they're doing is. They don't even consider that Allah might not be real or that there are other religions out there. This is because their pious parents felt the need to pass on their religion to their children. These kids didn't have a choice. It religion to blame for these actions because were these people non-Islamic, they would not have cared about "Draw Muhammad Day" and would not have preformed these actions.Also, if you look in Islamic countries on a daily basis, you might find this: These powerful images were delivered by religion, as the Quran is what has influenced thus women's rights violation because of its many sexist passages[1] that were taken as the word of Allah. "O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful."[2]All these things are by products of religion, because if you were to make all of these people atheists, those images would not exist. It is religion which causes people to devote their entire lives to a god, take ancient desert books and use them as the source of their morality, and countless other things.I've focused in on a Islam quite a bit here, but I'd like to note that Christianity has its bad influences as well. For example, this all-too-familiar picture: More kids, who have been brainwashed by the Westboro Baptist Church to believe in their religion, causes kids to hold up these signs. What eight-year-old that you know holds up signs saying "God hates America" because it's their will? Religion influences these people's actions.I awaiat Con's Arguments.Sources:1. http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...2. http://quran.com...
Higher Education (Full Resolution in R1)

In this Round I'm going to write your ballot for you. Lets start on what he just argued in his last round. Recognize that by accepting this debate, he accepts all of the rules I lay out. Look to the second rule of this debate. I have bolded and underlined the relevant parts. When possible, links must be provided to the full, original source within the body of the argument. However, that is not always possible. In the event that either party forgets, they should begin their next case by telling voters that their evidence is in the comments. The first time this happens, voters should note is as a misconduct. The second time voters should give the offending party a loss. (1) I committed said violation once. I acted in the manner that the rules have outlined I should. Therefore, I still extend all arguments from my R2 through the round. I am the only one who presented arguments throughout this round that link back into the resolution. Realize that even if you drop all of my sources, despite the fact that I follow the rules through out the debate in regards to my sources, I'm the only side with clear, uncontested logic when I tell you in my R2 that logically, only the federal government is the only actor who can act to fix the current problems with costly colleges. Extend every single piece of evidence, every warrant, every impact. At this point, this is a very clear Affirmative ballot. Thank you all for reading.
Higher Education (Full Resolution in R1)

My sources for the previous round are in the comments. I apologize for any inconvenience or trouble this has caused. I will also link those sources again at the bottom.My opposition drops my entire case and presents no arguments of his own. His only argument is that he asks the voters to dock me conduct and source points. recognize a few things here. First, the rules clearly outline that this debate will use a "Select Winner" system, not a 7 point system that he seems to be alluding to. Secondly, as outlined in the rules, this offense is not enough to justify a loss, I have underlined the relevant parts When possible, links must be provided to the full, original source within the body of the argument. However, that is not always possible. In the event that either party forgets, they should begin their next case by telling voters that their evidence is in the comments. The first time this happens, voters should note is as a misconduct. The second time voters should give the offending party a loss. (14)Now let me further explain why you are voting aff in this debate. First, Governments need to act. Costly Colleges have their limitations and clearly limit lower income students. Secondly, higher education provides societal benefits. If the government can expand access to higher education, the government will better society. Third, their exist job gaps in the status quo, and in the future more and more jobs will require higher education. For these reasons, this is going to be a clean affirmative ballot.1:https://www.luminafoundation.org...2:http://files.eric.ed.gov...3:http://www.economist.com...4:https://www.washingtonpost.com...5:http://www.brookings.edu...6:https://drive.google.com...7:https://itstopswithme.humanrights.gov.au...8:https://drive.google.com...9:https://trends.collegeboard.org...10:https://www.gov.uk...11:http://scs.georgetown.edu...12:http://intranet.niacc.edu...13:http://www.theatlantic.com...14:http://www.debate.org...
Higher Education (Full Resolution in R1)

The Resolved for this debate shall be Resolved, On Balance, in the United States, it is in the best interest of the people for the Federal Government to guarantee affordable higher education. ==Rules and Voting==This debate will use a "Select Winner" Voting method. This means you evaluate arguments and evidence above all else and should vote solely off of that. Now onto the rules Each Debater will get 4 rounds. For the Opposition, this means they can begin round 1 and waive round 5, or can waive round 1 and finish round 5. Violation of this rule is an automatic loss. When possible, links must be provided to the full, original source within the body of the argument. However, that is not always possible. In the event that either party forgets, they should begin their next case by telling voters that their evidence is in the comments. The first time this happens, voters should note is as a misconduct. The second time voters should give the offending party a loss. Counterplans, Ks, etc. are all permitted but discouraged. If one side wishes to run a CP or K, they must explain why it is the best/only possible way for them to win the round. Whether the final speech is presented in Round 4 or Round 5, No new arguments or evidence should be presented. Voters should make note of an offending party and drop them for it. You may provide new analysis, but it must be based on pre-existing arguments and/or evidence. Have fun, be civil, and maintain some degree of professionalism. Any questions may be presented in the comments and I will answer them.
Is BMW better than Mercedes

As a master automotive technician, I do not believe either are very good, unless you have a pile of money that you are wishing to waste on your own image. If maintained meticulously, insanely meticulously, with absolutely no worries about the cost of service and repair, then they are both equal. Drive them in between hard and soft, change the oil twice as often as the makers recommend, and either will be a decent vehicle, but essentially, both are overrated.
Is BMW better than Mercedes

I am trying to make a choice between BMW and mercedes, i dont know which one is better, i dont even know which i want to buy but both cars have alot of pros and cons, Bmw is the ultimate driving machine, it has probably the best looks a car could get, i havent seen a car that looks as good as M6 Bmw has done an amazing job with the m6 and m5 and other bmers, on the other hand Mercedes Benz has the Amg models which are powerfull, I think Mercedes is more powerfull company than Bmw but is this true, i am looking for answers from car experts or past owners of these two brands, truely which one of these two brand is worth to trust, which one will have less repairs, but is fast and catches everyones eye in the streets.