Homosexuality is natural and morally correct. Homophobia is morallly incorrect.

My opponent's resolution is threefold. First, he claims that "Homosexuality is natural." This I have no problem with. The fact that homosexuality exists means it's natural, though I guess it could be argued to be unnatural if genetic engineering is done to make someone gay, though I doubt this is the case. Next, my opponent claims that "Homosexuality is morally correct." He does not back this up - I will show in my arguments below that he fails to substantiate this argument. Lastly, my opponent claims that "Homophobia is morally incorrect." I will show below why this too is not backed up. I. Homosexuality RE: "Homosexuals are good parents" Does this mean homosexuality is morally correct? I would think not. People who illegally download Microsoft Windows probably make fine parents too, but that certainly has no bearing on whether or not stealing Windows is morally correct or not. RE: "Homosexuals are competent soldiers" Once again, this does not affirm the resolution. Same analogy as above works here. Re: "Homosexuality is not a disorder" Neither is stealing Microsoft Windows. Once again, this fails to touch on the resolution. RE: "Homosexuals should be able to marry" Once again, this has nothing to do with the resolution. Even so, it is very arguable. We do not allow marriages between a human and an animal. We do not allow marriages between a child and an adult. We do not allow marriages between blood relatives. We do not allow marriages between members of the same sex. These are all criteria for marriage. The same arguments one could use for supporting gay marriages would work for any of these examples. Thus far, we can conclude that homosexuality is morally neutral. There is nothing morally positive about homosexuality. Even so, there are many arguments for it being morally negative. 1] Many religions explicitly state that Homosexuality is immoral. Christianity, which my opponent seems to accept as a valid source, is one of them. 2] Homosexuality creates unneeded complications with the standard family model. 3] I would like to point out a statement my opponenet made: "Nobody would choose homosexuality if it was a choice." In that statement, my opponenet has already agreed that homosexuality would be a bad choice if it was a matter of choice. Also, do not let the fact that it may not be a matter of choice stop you from accepting that homosexuality is not morally correct. Psycho killers are often born that way, it's natural, sometimes it's not a choice they make, but it's still quite immoral. Also, consider that a morally neutral thing is not 'morally correct.' Eating a biscuit is not morally correct, nor is it morally incorrect. Next, let's talk about homophobia. My opponenet attempts to show that homophobia is morally incorrect. His only argument is that judging anyone is morally incorrect. In my opponenet's dreamworld, law can only exist as an immoral thing [since that necessarily involves judging people]. People can't make decisions about whether or not to trust someone [since that necessarily involves judging people]. It is immoral to prefer one person to another [since that necessarily involves judging people]. Not only is this impossible, but it's down right stupid. Judging people is necessary, and there's nothing inherently wrong with it. Once again, I hold that Homophobia is morally neutral, since there has been given no criteria whereby it should be attached to morality.