The god that christians believe in is amazingly STUPID!!!!

I meant this to be the last paragraph but decided its better for the first...Civil debate? Sure, if you can offer something intelligent with an education and bring up some evidence and not some swiss cheese as nearly 100% of all of my opponents have. But this argument is civil for me. And I think you did a pretty damn good job here. sorry if I seem insulting here. I'm not really. Please take it with a grain of butterfly salt stacked on top of old smoggy. My hands are in agony at this point and are completely numb. So typing is very difficult to say the least. And believe me, I know what pain is. But I"m constantly stumbling over keys. My belief system is f--k the printed god of the bible as this thing pretty much hates everything --- especially chilly children. Care for Mother Earth. Stop all wars and hate. Get rid of all guns, no exceptions. Start--to---care---about---each---other---damn---it!!!!!!! The printed god of the bible doesn't. As all life is spiritual AND is inner connected!!!!! "I don't know why the god of the bible would need to communicate in any form to god," Oh I see, so everything according to you, that god is, is mindless empty voidless completely empty space since there is no form of communication to YOUR god. So that even makes this god of YOURS even more stupider that even any atheist could possibly ever assume. "so that rule to follow suit with your video" " Its not my video. Its a video I presented to ultimately show that YOUR god would not ever be stupid enough to use text as a form of communication, in which he wouldn't. "Nowhere in this debate does it say prove the existence of God." I"m puzzled? Which god? After all there are millions of them that have been created through the 100,000 or so religions that have been created in an attempt to explain the unexplained throughout the existence of the human race. "It's different strokes really. There is no way to convince you there is a god, because I admit I don't believe in any "true" evidence God exists. There's no non-anecdotal miracle I can cite to that can't be explained via science, and I wouldn't accept this debate if that had been the premise." Duhsvillve via slippery furry tongued orange peels. "However, I did accept the debate because the premise is wrong in that you assume God only communicated through text." Well, see you like the typical christian CAN"T READ. Is that the title of this debate? No you only form in your little beanie what you want to chirp without any consequence and then you go from there. "God, in the book you condemn, is explicitly known to send messages through his own voice in people's ears through sending what essentially was a translator (Jesus Christ) to send his message." Well by gum, its still in text form now isn"t it without proof of one god damned thing. And as stated you cannot prove that god exists, you cannot prove that jesus has ever existed, so until you do, all you have is text. "So to address the parts about evidence, let's discuss that many historians do believe in the existence of Jesus. Historians have also agreed that the Crucifixion of Jesus happened." No they haven"t. And even if they have so what? Doesn"t mean that this shabby little nobody was a prophet of this god in which nobody can even prove exists. Have fun in watching these videos. (Yah didn"t watch the first bunch of videos in the first round. That"s a point blank obvious no.) - jesus wasn"t jesus (Aron Ra) - The True Core of the jesus Myth (Christopher Hitchens) - Did jesus Exist? - Why christianity is Unreasonable (Richard Carrier) - Biggest Lie - The fourth gospel ("The first striking revision in the 4th gospel is that the ministry of jesus has ballooned out from from one year to three. The writers not only make a reference not only from one but to three distinct passover festivals. Now was this just a tradition that some early christians held to a three year ministry and others to a one year ministry? Can anyone honestly maintain that whole dialogues could be remembered word for word for many decades and yet believers have no common agreement whether these words were said during one year or during three years?") Um duh. Do you REALLY THINK jesus existed? - The Gospel According to Carrier (Richard Carrier states jesus may have possibly existed, but scrap all the mythology) - Proving the Historicity of Jesus? Tracie and David - Stephanie Thomason vs Matt Dillahunty, or how not to debate an Atheist! (skip to the 7:00 mark!!!) Oh this one is good and beyond hilarious - What did jesus do for you? So we can scrap the rest of your paragraph as nothingness. My that was fun. "so that is definitive proof we had God communicate via Jesus." Once again you cannot even prove that this god of yours even exists. And you only have the bible to prove that he does. The same is true for jesus. And all you have are STORIES VIA TEXTS that cannot be proven to be true. So don"t tell me that ""It's different strokes really. There is no way to convince you there is a god, because I admit I don't believe in any "true" evidence God exists. There's no non-anecdotal miracle I can cite to that can't be explained via science," because absolutely you 100% do. What is the purpose of this debate? The god of the bible is tragically flawed as the only way of communication that there was with this god was through text, and this god would not use text if even a billionth way competent, which is a HUGE contradiction, thus in no possible way should be worshiped (there"s also plenty more reasons, saved for other debates why this printed god god the bible should NOT BE WORSHIPED BY ANYONE FOR ANY REASON). Now if you were have have watched the videos in the first round in which you clearly didn"t, you would have fully understood that. As I stated "do or die". AND I haven"t even gotten into why this god would never use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible. Its simple common sense. Oh yes, the bible shows this all too well. Gee I as well as everyone can out-think this supposed god. AND part of it which you completely ignored, so I shall repeat it" NOTHING is established in scripture of your holy book so everybody can get it wrong as there"s been 0 updates in at least 2,000 years. There"s translations upon translations upon translations upon translations upon copies upon copies upon copies upon copies upon dead languages upon dead langanguages with absolutely 0% of a chance to trace it back to the original. And there"s no original in the first place! So absolutely nobody is interpreting correctly. And within those translations and copies throughout the generations, characters and what they have said, especially with its leading characters, namely god and christ, their quotes/ verses have changed over time. Oh really? Who has the right and or knowhow to change ANY of god"s language to update it to whatever they felt like and or to amputate it into ---their--- language? Did they consulte god and or jesus to see if this was OK? Of course not. And more importantly did they get it right as an updated version to what these characters would say in this day and age, or even back then when the translations were updated? 100% certainly not. So once again god if as stated was reasonably intelligent would ---never--- use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible because he would have certainly have foreseen all of these major faults. Please tc and have fun -Michael