Atheism is more probable then Theism

http://www.debate.org......; Our debate is five rounds, yet Pro refers to four rounds in this post. That is because the debate round he plagiarized was from a four-round debate. Fortunately, Pro did not plagiarize an argument round but only an acceptance round so it's not so serious. But still, plagiarism is plagiarism. lol. It makes sense for humans to try to eliminate evil on the earth. We are living with it day to day. It’s all around us. We are compelled to eliminate evil because it affects us so deeply. But from God’s perspective, in Heaven, this life is temporary and overwhelmingly short compared to eternity.Ok. A supernatural being who intervenes left and right into our affairs to prevent evil sounds more like a magic genie than a respectable god. So? God can't find time to, oh , cure AIDS? Does God not have traits of a genie? ...lead to a greater good, or build character, God could still have a reason for allowing them, the aforementioned one. And what is that reason? God is all-powerful. There is nothing he could logically do. So why evil? ...rely on experience to form the conclusion that the universe has a cause of its existence. We know the universe has cause of its existence because it is contingent.So? And you are wrong. I don't judge based on experience in the creation of the Universe. It could have been any other way. The universe’s existence is not entailed by any aspect of the universe. There is no reason why it could have been something else, or not existed at all. Something outside of the universe is required to explain why it exists. What? You just repeated the KCA. And there is many theories for the Universe. Ever heard of Virtual particles? The KCA only says that things which begin to exist need a cause of their existence. Since God did not begin to exist, this rule does not apply to God, so the KCA is not a problem for God and is not self-refuting. Because the Universe didn't have a cause the KCA doesn't apply to it. It is foolish to think God was around forever and not supply proof. Stop making assertions and then we talk. It’s the most non arbitrary, most comprehensive, and most economical solution to the problem. lol. It is not. What created the creator? God was just floating around in nothing, doing nothing before he wanted to create the Universe. Which, is more logically then a Universe that was always around. I have demonstrated why the problem of evil fails as an argument for atheism, and why the basic form behind the cosmological argument still stands. I have shown that the three arguments Pro presented for his resolution fail. Okay. Attacks The paradox of all-power/all-knowing"Can A all-knowing God with find the power to change his future mind? his future mind?"In short, God can't change his mind in a decision. .God is looking into the future to see the outlook. He changes his mind to something else, which he sees and changes his mind to change his mind, ad infinity. So far Con has not given his BOP. Vote MA. GRAMMATICAL ERRORS 1- debate title — “Atheism is more probable then theism” The word “then” is supposed to be “than” in the debate title. 2- round one — “We are not referring to anyspecific deity”. There is supposed to be a space between “any” and “specific”. 3- round two — “The issue with this is because we only can witness ex materia creation, not ex nihilo.” It should read either “The issue with this is that we can only witness…” or perhaps “This isproblematicbecause we only can witness…” 4- round two — Not the best argument but time to move on the the Kalam. It should read “…time to move on to the kalam.” kfc