Expletives Should Never be Used

I wasn't suggesting that everything could be taken as discrimination which is what my opponent appears to be saying here. I was saying that language that many people could take as discrimination. It's ridiculous to say that everything could be taken as discriminatory, and even though it can, it's very unlikely for a lot of language to be taken as discriminatory. Asking how someone is couldn't be taken as discriminatory for most people. Actually, as to the fact that I turned around my opponent's argument, firstly you can do that in debate. Secondly, that one argument can be used for multiple purposes; it may be a similar argument, but it's definitely not the same. My opponent is arguing that people see things different ways as a reason for expletives whereas I see it as because people see things different ways, expletives shouldn't be used because it's offensive. This is the point of debating to turn around points to your advantage, and I cannot understand how my opponent is using this as an example of contradiction because this is what you do in debating. Thirdly, I believe I have defended my point well since I have put forward a large variety of examples. However, I'll summarize that point again; expletives can be used for discrimination or interpreted for discrimination. It is ludicrous for my opponent to suggest that this couldn't be offensive if expletives were used for discrimination. Also, some people can interpret expletives as offensive because of the meaning of the words, and if they are called that expletive, it can seriously damage them. It can make them think that they are not liked, and a joke can turn very bad. While my opponent keeps saying I haven't provided adequate defensive, I'd like to ask how because I believe I've defended my arguments well, and I've provided a lot of evidence as to how it could be offensive. I do not understand based on what I've done how my opponent cannot understand my argument. As to my opponent's second point of course my opponent has to defend it. My opponent is being a hypocrite now saying that I haven't done adequate defense, and then in their argument providing absolutely no evidence for a rebuttal to my point. I've made a point, and I'd expect my opponent to try to defend it. They say that they're not giving up on their responsibility, but by not even trying to respond and saying it's not their duty is really getting out of their responsibility. Debating is about responding to your opponent's points, and my opponent hasn't done that, yet they say that I've not done any defense. This is a ridiculous thing to say. However, despite this I will provide more evidence for my opponent to understand my point. Children hearing expletives I believe is bad firstly because there is no positive at all. I've challenged my opponent to provide a challenge, and they haven't done that. If nothing good comes out of something, then why should it be done. It's like having a revolution against a great government; it just has no benefit. Secondly, through one child hearing expletives it spreads. Soon all of the kids in their class will be using these expletives. Schools have policies against this language, and although there are other reasons, it will get kids in trouble. They may have been great kids but just hear their friends using these words and then start using them. It may get well behaved kids in trouble. While my opponent could argue that their parents could stop them, this is not realistic. The parents aren't everywhere and may not even know that the child knows the word until they get called into the Principal's office. However, this isn't a strong enough argument on its own. This is just surface level, but it is true, and my opponent needs to do some rebuttals to show how this isn't the case. Now I'd like to look at a deeper level to support my surface level argument. I would like to delve into the moral issue of why kids or anyone for that matter shouldn't use expletives. It is simply wrong. Why would you use words with such bad meanings? Why would you do something that is so offensive? It doesn't help us; for the most part these dreadful words only harm. People don't often say the meanings of the words or think about the words when they're saying them. Then after it's ruined friendships because their friend feels like that person is calling them something when they never intended it to sound that way. This isn't a hard concept it is simply consequences like someone would teach a young child. You do a negative action, and there will be some kind of negative consequence. Do a positive action, and then there will be a positive consequence. These words mean bad things and are mean which means that they simply shouldn't be used. Overall, I do feel it's my opponent's responsibility to reply to my argument which I've made. My opponent in their third argument seems to be calling expletives art. Here I'd just like to point out that they never mentioned this anywhere else in their debate. Also, how are expletives art? Nobody thinks of a word alone as art. There are some amazing and beautiful words, but they need to be used in some manner to make art. I don't understand what my opponent is saying right there. Also, they may make art, but it's not a good piece of art. Instead it's an awful and offensive piece of art that should never have used those words in the first place. I will continue this in my next paragraph when I'll talk about art and why expletives shouldn't be used. Although I believe I've provided adequate evidence to how expletives can ruin lives, I'll summarize. My opponent seems to be avoiding responding to my point. They haven't actually provided any evidence of how I've not made my point will. However, I'll still summarize. People can interpret language a certain way, and expletives run a high risk of being offensive. People shouldn't call other people something so mean and attacking. It doesn't benefit people. They can be interpreted in a bad way. I do not see how my opponent cannot see that if someone calls their friend an expletive as a joke; it can go wrong. It can start a horrible argument which can then result in a relationship falling apart. Overall, expletives can very easily be interpreted badly and shouldn't be used. Expletives may be made to be offensive, but they're offensive in the wrong way. People get angry at the expletive rather than what they're meant to get upset by. There was a quote to display, but I've forgotten the quote. However, it gave a shocking statistic, and then it had an expletive in that same sentence. In the end it said that you cared more that they used the expletive than the shocking statistic. Expletives aren't a creative way, and there are many more effective ways to express what you want to say and create an emotional response to the right thing. Overall, expletives aren't the best way to express emotion or make people feel a certain way. Overall, my opponent has provided very limited evidence for their side. Expletives should not be used because of how offensive they can be, and my opponent has displayed no positive reasons to justify expletives.