You are not a real person and are only trying to make Islam look bad

1) Ever since youve started debating, when people comment on your debates and they side against you, you always go on the defensive saying how people hate you because you are a muslim woman and then immediately after that go on the offensive and call everyone ignorant, hateful, etc.You claim that you are not allowed to have your own picture but then you claim you dont even want your own picture on this site. But when a new person joins the site they are not obligated to have a picture at all. Many on here have simple avatars that are used by hundreds of other profiles, but you went through all the trouble of digging through Google, finding an Arab woman on the internet who you havent even heard of, took her picture, and used it as your own. That begs the question "why go through all that for a picture of a young Arab woman if you yourself claim you did not want to do that and you had numerous chances to not have to post a picture at all?"2) "but persecuting me for believing differently than you with regard to my stances on issues is unnecessary and rude"Nice try Con, this argument is about how you strategically only voiced your opinion on specific big issues that only relate to Islam, the US, terrorism, etc. and took very stereotypical stances on all of them, only to leave all the other issues blank.... I am merely pointing out that this is very suspicious activity and is a trademark of someone who is only here to mock other's views and preach their own views regardless of right or wrong.3) "I went pro on that case. Look again. You've insulted my true beliefs, and now you are misrepresenting others to insult. That is insulting, and is not proper conduct on a debate site."Is being an outragous liar considered proper conduct because thats what you just gave away on this point. Here is the debate in question, http://www.debate.org...In the debate you yourself changed the resolution in your first argument saying "I accept this debate with the assumption that this is the resolution, "Resolved: Western Powers should not intervene militarily in Iran.""You changed the resolution of the debate to say the US should NOT invade in Iran, then took the PRO side to that debate, which is the equivolent of you being CON the US invading Iran...... which was what I was referring to in my opening argument.........4) Yes you have quoted Islam in your arguments several times, that is the prime reason people think your a fraud account. Here is some of the Islamic references you have used in debates,"How did species evolve if this is a scientific principle? They didn't. Allah created them." - evolution debate"it takes a greater leap of faith to believe this pseudo-science than to believe Allah created it. " - her opinion about evolution"I wish you luck, but I have Allah on my side; he will show me the path to rhetorical superiority." - opening statement in Iran debate"The Qur'an states that we should, "Torture those who insult Islam." It's our duty to "fight against the Mushrikun collectively as they fight against you collectively. If you attack my brothers in their homeland, they will have every reason to take down the United States or Western Nation who provokes." - Iran debateSame debate, but another argument that she used"They should intervene militarily in Iran, so they finally get what they deserve. To follow Allah, but with a clean conscience, requires the intervention of Western military powers in Iran for Allah, the people, and I to agree to use nuclear weapons."Here's the granddaddy of them all, this is regarding the Iran intervention debate"I think the West should intervene, because it contributes to the West's downfall. This appeases Allah."Your choice of arguments are some of the most hateful, discriminatory arguments ever seen on this website, and you are still unconcerned with your conduct because you are here only to hate on America while preach Islam. But at the same time you are sacrificing the good name of Islam just to hate on America and your letting every single person who reads your arguments to see your views that in accordance with Islam, all Americans should die As for your other "views", You hate America so much you openly have declared that all Americans should die because your god wants us to (an allegation which is completely false and you are now slandering your own religion). If you hate America so much though then why do you A) support Barack Obama in your political affiliation tab which you could have left blankB) used a Barack Obama quote in your favorite quotes section you try to advocate Islam withThe only reason one would do this is to imply that Barack Obama is a Muslim which is false and I doubt you have any proof at all to suggest he is a Muslim5) "Can you please just stay out of my business? Let me debate people. That's what this site is about, not cyberbullying me like you're an over-aggressive corpulent drunkard. LEAVE ME ALONE."Part of DDO is eliminating trolls and people who do not contribute to this site intellectually and instead takes away from its intelligence value overall. After your rants in debates openly advocating how you want America to die because it will please Allah and that we have it coming is in no way an "intellectual" argument. If you want to debate really badly and use the kind of arguments you are using, go to Youtube or Yahoo Answers and preach your hate speech there, because it is not welcome here and people who do use hate speech get kicked out. As for the Cyber-bullying accusation Cyber-bullying is defined as "the use of information and communication technologies to support repeated hostile behavior intended to harm others"- 1 - I have not done this repeatedly. I have had no contact with the Con prior to this debate. Other members have questioned your legality (a forum thread even questioned the Con's legality) and after investigating your actions and debating style I've found very concerning evidence and have challenged you to this debate to prove your actions. You accepted this debate when you easily could've declined it, so dont accuse me of bullying you when we've never even had a conversation before and when you had the power to reject this debate. - 2 - "over-aggressive corpulent drunkard"are not exactly words a normal person would use to try to plead their innocence.To summarize my case at this point1) The Pro has only adressed parts of the Big Issues that relate to Islam and has taken specific stances against the US on them and then in actual debates has used extremist Islamic views to denounce America2) The debates you have accepted or started are all very overly-religious in which you denounce all your opponants for being offensive, hateful, ignorant, drunkards, aggressive, etc. (half of those words youve used against me in this debate...) but then go on to preach how extremist Islam is the correct argument for everything but whenever you have a chance to throw America under a bus you throw Islam's reputation in the trash and cite how Allah loves dead Americans just for your own arguments. 3) Your arguments in these debates have been so anti-american that it is clearly intended to upset Americans by claiming we all deserve to die horrible deaths and that this will please your god. Since you are outspoken against America your "logic" and numerous references to Islam are phrases you use to denounce America while making Islam look bad. 4) Your original picture was of an Arab woman that you used to represent yourself when you could have used any avatar and remained anonymous, and when I call you on it you change your profile picture halfway through the debate to cover your tracks. Let me stop here and just ask the Con a question, Do you actually think Allah wants all Americans, including me, to die a terrible death just because we are from the West?