Darwinism, Evolution by Natural Selection, and Athiesm is False and Un-scientific

Seeing that the argument of a God is imperative to this Subject, I would like to 1: See Con prove that God Isn't real, As Darwinism tells us that No God is existent, nor as it created us, and 2: prove to me that Life can come from Non-living entities.-If indeed, all Molecules have came from Chemicals, and all that we are made up of is chemicals, than how did the first cell reproduce? Let me explain further my argument: Assuming that you are right, and living can come from Non-living, upon creation this "Living" thing would have no knowledge. I do not mean Knowledge as we have, but Recorded information within it's DNA, and the know-how on how to reproduce. You cannot create something with a chemical soup, or a zap of lightning and expect it to know how to reproduce unless it was pre-programmed.According to what Con would like to think, a simple self-copying molecule was made in a primordial soup. This does not however, explain how complex compounds such as DNA came into existence, as we have no proof that DNA an be created from simple self-replicating molecules, nor can we explain how our own minds record Information and DNA. The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is still called a theory instead of a law. The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process. The DNA in plants and animals allows selective breeding to achieve desired results. Dogs are a good example of selective breeding. The DNA in all dogs has many recessive traits. A desired trait can be produced in dogs by selecting dogs with a particular trait to produce offspring with that trait. This specialized selective breeding can continue for generation after generation until a breed of dog is developed. This is the same as the "survival of the fittest" theory of the evolutionists. Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. The same process of selective breeding is done with flowers, fruits, and vegetables.New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals. Evolutionist fail to admit that no species has ever been proven to have evolved in any way.-Aside from Evolution by Natural selection, We can't observe Evolution.As Con said, We can conclude things about different universes with mathematical formulas. To observe is to see in action. We can plainly see the mathematical equation in Action, as math has always existed and is the same all across our universe and beyond. There are no Mathematical equations explaining evolution, nor are their un-disputed facts to back it up. Math Doesn't lie, but every single "link" in the Darwinist chain has been highly disputed, and there still is evidence that The theory of Evolution could be false. Gravity is a Law, Not a theory, as we know that their are two motions: Push and Pull. If space constantly pushed things in, then every planet would become a giant target, as all asteroids would be pushed into these "Divits" in space. Pulling is the only possible explanation for our placement, and predicament, therefore it is a law. The same can't be said for Evolution.-Onto my proof that a God is infact real. The Following is an excerpt from an article. I will provide the link. It is impossible that Christianity is not God's revelation of truth to man. Simply impossible. The math proves it beyond question. It doesn't take faith to believe that one plus one equals two, and it doesn't take faith to identify the religion which has mathematical certainty in its corner. God didn't have to give us mathematical proof of His existence, but He did it anyway. God didn't have to give us proof of Christianity, but He chose to do so. And God didn't have to give us proof of His love for us, but that is exactly what He did. The proof is irrefutable. I live in Nebraska where I serve as a pastor. Imagine someone covering this entire state in silver dollars 6 feet deep. Then mark one coin and bury it anywhere across the state. Next, blindfold a man and have him choose one coin. The odds that he would choose the marked coin are the same odds of getting 8 prophecies all fulfilled in one man. God gave us about 300 fulfilled prophecies in the Person of Jesus Christ. Here are 8 of those 300 prophecies: (1) The Messiah will be born in Bethlehem. (Micah 5:2; Matthew 2:1; Luke 2:4-6)(2) The Messiah will be a descendant of Jacob. (Numbers 24:17; Matthew 1:2)(3) The Messiah will enter Jerusalem as a king riding on a donkey. (Zechariah 9:9; Mark 11:4-11)(4) The Messiah will be betrayed by a friend. (Psalm 41:9; Luke 22:47,48)(5) The Messiah's betrayal money will be used to purchase a potter's field. (Zechariah 11:13; Matthew 27:9,10)(6) The Messiah will be spat upon and struck. (Isaiah 50:6; Matthew 26:67)(7) The Messiah's hands and feet will be pierced. (Psalm 22:16; John 20:25-27)(8) Soldiers will gamble for the Messiah's garments. (Psalm 22:18; Luke 23:34) The Author of this article (Dan Delzell) put it perfectly. These Books of the Old testament in which the prophecies were written, were authored from Approximately 1450 B.C.-700 B.C. All of the prophecies from above were made at least 700 years before Christ. I would first challenge Con to Read the bible, then I would like for Con to explain to me how these prophecies did Not come true. The Original texts of the Bible have been Carbon-Dated, and thoroughly researched (The same as Fossils), and Most scholars agree that Jesus was infact a real person, being born in the same date, town, time, family, and having died at the exact time, and way.-Re Re: Evolution is Useful. I do not understand how Humans interacting with dinosaurs (Hypothetically) could provide evidence for a God. The Bible clearly states that Animals were made before Humans, and it is not off the Drawing board that a God or supernatural being created Dinosaurs.-Re Re: Testing Evolution & Repeated ExperimentsThe Fossil record you referenced is highly incomplete. Archaeologists have found simple organisms for long ago, but have yet to find the thousands of intermediate species involved. Let me explain: Most if not all modern Children is America have seen the chart of the apes evolving into Humans. How do we know that these apes weren't just a separate species of Apes (Not Human Ancestors), and What comes before that chart. what specific species evolved into monkeys (Let us represent this organism with X), Then what species evolved into type X? then what Species evolved into type Y? and so on. -Con claims that Constant micro-evolutional changes can result in Macro-Evolution, And I do not argue with this. I do not particularly agree with Evolution, nor do I disagree. There is substantial evidence for and against Evolution, and I will not be touching on the topic of Macro-Evolution, as it not what I am debating. If this were meant to apply to Evolution by Natural selection (With the Cockroach example), I would also have to disagree. A Species is a group of similar Animals which can reproduce. Building up resistance against a pesticide (Along with many other changes over time) does not change the fact that this species can reproduce with others of it's same species. In addition, Resistance to a pesticide requires an outside force. Without a pesticide, their would be no need for This Micro-Evolution.-Direct Observation isn't needed, but to prove a Theory (Make it into a Law), there needs to be irrefutable facts such as Bees carrying pollen, and that our earth Rotates.Science is like a circle. The bigger it gets, the more places it touches (The more question are raised). We need God more today! https://carm.org...