Evolutionism Vs. Creationism

I made a simple analogy that comparing a scientific theory with a story from an ancient book is like comparing Einstein's theory of relativity to a mother goose story about how Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.I don't understand how my opponent can interpret that as "Scientific facts are part of Mother Goose rhymes".I never said that. If my opponent doesn't even understand what an analogy is, I might as well give up trying to talk to him at all.My opponent claims "many of the happenings in the Bible have been proven true, along with the "In The Beginning..." the first chapter in it."Well, the happenings in my Spiderman comic books happen in New York which is a real place. So what?The Book of Genesis has been debunked and is a joke in the world of science.My opponent admits "I will not deny that things in biology change..."Well then the debate is over, because that's all evolution is and my opponent won't deny it. "creationdesign.org" is not a scientific website and isn't evidence for anything. My opponent asks, "What would MAKE you believe in God?" My answer: god. If god wanted me to believe in him, I'm sure nothing could stop him.I shouldn't even respond to the rest of the nonsense my opponent wrote.DNA s not a book. It's chemicals. There are millions of atoms in a drop of water, If I wrote all that down you'd have a huge "book" too. So what? My opponent ignored half the video. The video explained how evolution works without knowing how life itself began.The video explained the difference between a theory and a scientific theory. My Opponent: "your type of breeding causes deceases and rare disabilities because of the genes, so how did all these species change yet there were no gene problems? 99% of all species are now extinct due to gene problems.My opponent:"How does each specie know who/what to breed with to create an entire new offspring of a new specie?"It doesn't know. Evolution doesn't have a goal it's trying to reach. My opponent doesn't have a clue what evolution is and asking that proves it.My opponent thinks you put together a living thing part by part like on an assembly line"1,051,200,000,000,000 seconds in two billion years and there are 1,000,000,000,000,000 neurological connections."A living organism grows and develops all at once no matter how complex it is. This shows how my oppoenet's mind is clouded by creationism and the concept that something "created" must be put together one part at a time. That's not how living things come about.My opponent stopped watching the video so he ignores the arguments and evidence.Stephen Hawking is an expert on quantum mechanics and physics. He claims something can can form out of nothing.Who is my opponent to deny that? The quantum world doesn't operate the way normal science does.That has nothing to do with evolution.In closing I have to say my opponent doesn't have a clue about what evolution is and how it works. He proved it over and over with his ridiculous questions. His attempts to debunk evolution were futile since they were based on his own ideas of what evolution is. At least the won't deny that "things in biology change". If he doesn't deny that, he, in fact, agrees that evolution is a fact.