God has commited most of the 7 deadly sins: Part 2

Also, my opponent found a website that has no sources, with only pure opinions with no weight behind it to support it. Therefore, his link will be thrown out. Sloth: I said God answers every ones prayers, but I never said that God would answer them in the way that they wanted. God does answer our prayers, but not in the way that we want. He says that when someone dies, he was calling them to be with him in heaven. But that just shows sloth, which agrees with me completely. He DOES answer our prayers, but in a way that will require a limited amount of work, as in just letting them die, therefore showing sloth. That was his only attack on my sloth case, so I assume that the rest he agrees with. Greed: God would still be God if no one worshiped him. While he would still be God, my opponent ignores the statement. I never said God wouldn't be God, I said he would cease to be regarded. By that I mean, for example, If someone came up with a good idea for a doughnut, and a group of people knew about it, but then the doughnut didn't sell, and everyone who knew about the doughnut forgot about it, It would cease to be regarded. Or If someone in government was forgotten, like forgotten by everyone, no one would listen to someone they don't know about, and he will cease to be regarded. Therefore, If God wasn't regarded, he would have no power, like the person in government. So he is greedy and needs worship, or his power is gone. If he greatly influences humanity to choose him you must explain why so many do not . First of all, my opponent doesn't go against this point, he just asks a question, so I assume he agrees. Anyway, many people do not fallow God because of all the distractions that keep us from paying attention to God, such as TV, video games, the media, our friends, and our jobs. My opponent doesn't attack anything else on Greed, so I assume he agrees with the rest. Envy: So, my says with Holy Jealousy, that basically God is possessive of Worship, which belongs to him. Not anyone else. If he thinks that, then isn't that envious? I assume he agrees with the rest that he didn't attack. Pride: My opponent states that the point was not to get to heaven, but Babel means "Gate to Heaven",(. http://www.emergingtruths.com...) meaning they were going to use the tower to get to heaven. My opponents claim on not wanting to get to heaven isn't backed up by anything, so It remains false until proves otherwise, because of my argument. And that's all he had, so the rest of my argument is still strong. Gluttony: I already showed this to be false. I already showed this true. Bam. The rest of my argument is untouched and still strong. Vanity/wrath: Pro needs to show that Gods killing was unjustified keeping in mind that there is a difference between killing and murdering. Killing and murdering are both forms of vanity/wrath, and are both wrong. Unless my oponent proves there is justified killing, I am right. And by the way, my oponent will probably argue about the "death sentence", but it was organized by the government, and since the government doesn't particually fallow God's every will, they are not compatible. This is false. He saved Noah, his family, and animals. EXACTLY! !! ! He killed everyone except a devoted God-fallowing family and all the animals, which completely ties along with my first argument on envy's point, which he has yet to rebutle, and by saying this, he has agreed with my argument completely. This is the most theologically unsound argument pro has made. He did not cause evil (all bad things), they were a result of the fall. It was Adam and Eves fault. You claimed Adam and Eve did not know better when God had, in fact, told them never to eat from the tree of knowledge. Thank you for the first sentence personal attack. I am crying my eyes out. My oponent ingores the fact that I am not necessarily arguing from a completely pro-God side of this argument, and Im not supposed to have a sound argument. As for Adam and Eve, they didn't know any better. They were the first 2 humans, didn't even know what sin was, and along came the Devil, the most influential, diabolical, and pursasive creature in the universe. He tricks Eve into having one, and Adam just accepts it from Eve, not knowing at all what was wrong with it. Satan convinced them to do it, because God didn't tell them what would happen if you did eat from it. Wait a second, why would God even put a "FORBIDDEN TREE OF GOOD AND EVIL" RIGHT SMACK DAB IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GARDEN, FILLED WITH DELICIOUS FRUITS THAT ARE PURPOSEFULLY DESIREABLE? !? !? !? !? !? !? ?? !? !? !? !? ! God knew that Adam and Eve would do it, so he put it there, and cursed all of humanity for something 2 oblivious people did. God made it so that sin and destruction could be in the world, just because 2 people screwed up, and hurt billions and billions of people with sin because of what 2 people did. If that isn't wrath , I don't know what wrath is. Basically, my oponent chose a sentence or two from each sin and barely attacked each of them. He must agree with everything else I said, so I win all of them that he supposedly attacked. Therefore, because he win's lust by default, I win 6/7. Thank you.