Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts,

Hello again,After reading this last post from you, I would adjure you to remember the Hindu concept of Kshama. To have patience and compassion upon those who disagree with you. I respect that you disagree with me and have a deep passion about your beliefs of the human soul but I will not allow that disagreement to lead me to believe it's a waste of time to collaborate with you. Rebuttal #1:You said:"now you are simply bluffing without explaining what is conscious in the basics of medical language or scientific basics. is this dry talking is your science ?"I assure you that I have no intent to deceive you, and addressed your questions to the best of my ability with my limited time. I gave you one possible scientific explanation for consciousness and it's origin by appealling to three real life examples that you yourself may have experienced, and then drew on the implications of those experiences to learn what it means for how we understand consciousness. I am not a neuroscientist and thus not equipped to speak confidently about the intracacies about the physical nature of consciousness. Just the layman's version, using experiences you and I can both be familiar with. :)Rebuttal #2:Your continued appeal to electricity and now gravity intrigues me. Is your argument simply built upon the idea that the soul like gravity and electricity is too small to be measured, yet true? My objection to this remark of course is that we understand that gravity is a force in nature and we absolutely know that electricity exists, we can see how they interact with physical objects as you pointed out correctly.However, we cannot see how this atomic spiritual energy effects anything in the physical. In fact the very term atomic spiritual is an oxymoron as "spiritual" and "soul" both denote immaterial substances, not really, really small atomic particles.A man is not strong because of some supernatural force, if this man does not eat for a week and obtain the physical sustainance that he requires then his strength will be greatly impaired. Why? Because we require at a cellular level energy supplied through oxygen, water and food to fuel our strength. You have not provided any evidence for the following: That such an atomic spiritual energy exists and that man has a spiritual spark. Therefore, even if my argument is not valid as an explanation, there would be no reason to accept yours as a, "Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts."Also, the expectation for scientists to resurrect dead organisms by injecting chemicals is in my opinion a misguided expectation. Dead organisms have no capacity to interact with chemicals anymore, because all of the cellular processes has ceased.Rebuttal #3:You said:"This is the process. you cannot understand that because there is soul within the child, therefore child is becoming boy. As soon as there is no soul, the child does not become a boy. This simple philosophy you cannot understand, so what is your position? Now, this car is standing because there is no driver. Anyone can understand. Stand still. It will remain there for thousands of years unless a driver comes. Simple reason. But you are so rascal, you will not understand. So what is the use of talking with you ? Simply waste of time."Here my opponent continues to posit the Hindu version of the soul as the answer for why the child does not become a man. Notice that this explanation has no evidence provided at all, except by a faith based assumption. Science tells us that the boy is unconscious and dead because his normal biological processes at a cellular level have ceased. Hinduism (of Pro's understanding) says that is is because the spiritual spark left his body. One of these assertions cannot possibly be substantiated by evidence, and therefore I submit that such an assertion must be dismissed without evidence.Concluding Statements:You said:"you are not even able to explain anything tangible or verifiable and you are the one who is claiming to have something more verifiable and tangible but i didn't seen one single line which you have explained in this entire conversation."I may not have provided evidence do your liking, but I did my best to provide real life examples that help corraborate my scientific claims about the human body and consciousness. These observations may be refuted if you are able to disprove the clearly falsifiable claims I made about what happens to our mind when we 1) lose sleep, 2) receive head trama, and 3) look at optical illusions.Pro never clearly stated what he was promoting here, but as I have pointed out before this is a type of religious evangelism for the religion of Hindu and the worship of Krishna. I have thus set out as Con to demonstrate how this worldview is not, based upon the arguments of Pro, a practical or helpful explanation/philosophy of the world.Kindest Regards,TrueScotsman