pandemic!

Thankyou Koopin, for the intriguing response. I will begin my refuting my opponents criticism of my plots, before going on to his. In response to my first plot of allowing animals to walk freely among humans, my opponent stated that the situation could be handled easily by fighting back with the animals using guns and other things. However that would suggest allowing all citizens to carry guns on them at all times (seeing as potentially any citizen is open to being attacked). This would not be good, because if all citizens were permitted to carry their weapons on them constantly, they would take advantage of that and use them for personal greed and treachery as most humans with killing power choose to do when its legal. So this would re-circulate into itself creating anarchy and crime rate increases. You claim we could push the the animals back to their own lands with openly getting into a fight with them. However, there are still peaceful animals who would have to suffer the consequences. The animals would revolt seeing as only carnivores were being banned rather then the vegetarian animals. Next you say that human kind would be better off not being able to eat meat, and would survive sufficiently off of just plants. However, this is not true. Every person, needs meat or animal fats and oils to stay perfectly functionals. Those vegans who claim they don't eat meat, have to get their protien source from somewhere. While some plants do provide proteins, it is not sufficient enough to sustain the human race itself. Not only that, but alot of people wouldn't take kindly to beinf forced to eat nothing but veggies. People would wordwide revolt against the situation, thus causing pandemic. In response to my second plot, one thing was un-looked upob. When adressing many people suddenly breaking their noses, we forget about the pain factor. While, it is easy to fix, everyone simultaneously breaking their nose would feel the people with a sudden burst of pain. Now my opponent says that a broken nose does not always mean blood. However when these people's nose broke, who is to say that the fracture didn't puncture the blood vessel on its way? Seeing as this is the case with Pretty much all nose breaks, and blood is usually sure to follow. My opponent says a nose break would not kill elderly and babies. For babies, a nose break would prove fatal seeing as they rely on their noses while still in the growth stage to provide oxygen for them. A nose break at that young would prove to be un-repairable. In an elderly person it would depend more on the specific elderly. However alot of elderly have trouble breathing as well and rely on machines to help them with the process. A broken nose at that age would proabably near impossible to fix. In response to my third plot you say that it is the smart people who just sit around in their offices and order lessers to do the work for them. Yes this is true. Because without the smart people, they would not know what to do or how to do their jobs. The smart people rule our world for a reason. Everyone else would have to start from scratch, not knowing how to handle the situation. Its progressism of the smaller society who have always worked for the upper class in all societies, seeing that it is human nature to rule and have power. Now with your navy seal compared to teacher part, a navy seal could just as easily be considered a smart person, seeing as the yare trained in the art of surviving and have all the know how on what their specific job in the branch is. My opponents: 1. If water was intoxicated, things would actually be better! Lets look at the bright sides. People when drunk are more happy. They are less judgemental. They are more fun. They are able to feel less physical pain. These are all qualities that every human wishes they could posess! We wouldn't have to worry about offending people while being drunk because other would be just as drunk. We could rid ourselves of modern discrepencies, and live happily and freely without worrying about cars, working, family provisionals. It would seemingly take care of itself. We would be able to get food fine, because we could easily hunt and kill the animals who would be just as drunk off the intoxicated water, and they would be unaware of their surroundings. It doesn't take much to fire a gun, even when drunk. We as humans could provide for ourselves just fine while drunk. And for alot of people, getting drunk increases IQ and intelligence rates! Double win! We wouldn't even need cops, because everyone would be happy and drunk. Seeing as all water would be intoxicated, our bodies would adapt to the environment, and grow used to the constant drinking. It would adjust the immune system to be able to handle the intoxicated water as if it were our regular drinking habit. 2. Who needs legs? Without legs humans could focus on walking with their hands, or using wheel chairs. This would increase arm strength, and wouldn't limit us a whole lot at all. We could still race (thought they would be a bit slower), we could still have sexual fun, we could still play sports, we would just have to be more creative and use other body parts that are perfectly functional. We have enough technology to most likely prevent bllod and disease from spreading past a certain point, seeing as they major diseases have immunities in human bodies. We could easily protect ourselves in that sense. 3. If all water was turned to HIV infected blood, then humans would still be able to survive off of soda's and juices and other liquid substenances. We really do not need sea life, although they provide food for many people. While not being able to eat fish, peopel would still be able to survive sufficiently off of other things and other meats. And if it were a problem driven to the extreme, we could always use our advanced space technology to look for water on some other planet or solar system. I would like to thank my foe for an interesting and fun response, and look forward to his next rebuttal. GW