The Pixar theory

1 -My opponent (The Instigator) has committed a fallacy of "shifting the burden of proof". I did not make any claim, I am defending the Pixar Theory, not attacking it. The BoP is always on The Instigator unless it is made clear in the opening arguments, along with a logical explanation. My opponent did neither of these during the opening statement. 2 - My opponent should lose points on poor grammar and spelling. 3 - The Easter Egg(s) were fun to start with, but after they added so many fans started to see a connection. I submit as proof an interview from jalopnik.com with Jay Ward who is an art coordinator with Pixar. "It's almost like the 9/11 conspiracy theories... it's like, really? No, the movies were sort of made in a different order by different directors in different times, in different places. It's cool that it all worked out that way, but it probably was not intentional." Jay is saying that some people have a lot of time on their hands to create a theory which Pixar never intended to create. Jay says, "It's cool that it all worked out that way, but it probably was not intentional". What Jay has said supports my previous positions in defense of the Pixar theory. 1 - The Pixar theory was "PROBABLY NOT INTENTIONAL". 2 - The movies were made by different directors, different times, different places. 3 - It's cool that it all worked out that way. 4 - My opponent has failed to follow the format of the definitions previously stated. a - The movie "The Good Dinosaur" has not been released to the public officially and cannot be used as a reference. b - An alternate 1960 (The Incredibles) is still within the same Pixar Universe. 5 - "Con" has admitted that "Okay, maybe they died out as it implied that they were...", thus supporting part of the Pixar theory. 6 - My opponent incorrectly assumes that because of a "Super" hero from The Incredibles, no one else would like a cowboy as a hero. 5 - My opponent incorrectly assumes that the character Andy, worships Woody and Buzz. Andy is just like a lot of kids, he has his favorite toys. 6 - Labeling Woody or Buzz as "lame" is only your personal opinion and not factual. a - Buzz was extremely popular; back in 1995 short-sighted retailers did not order enough dolls to meet demand. b - Woody is a rare, collectible toy also. 7 - My definitions and points are factual and irrefutable. 8 - We are talking animated Pixar creations right? Not real life? Bugs can talk? Witches exist? A rat cooks? a - The witch in Brave said wood cannot be imbued with magic, but it already has magic in it. b - Wood does have special magic-like properties (see Toy Story, Monsters Inc. and Brave). c - In Brave, there is a wood carving of the pizza truck, thus the theory that the witch visited that time period. d - In Brave, there is also a wood carving of Sully, from Monsters Inc. e - In Monsters Inc, there are magic-like wooden doors which function like the witch's door in Brave. f - In Brave, the witch exits her house with Merida and her crow, snaps her fingers and opens the door to reveal her cauldron and casting materials within. "Never craft where you conjure", she said. jalopnik.com/pixars-jay-ward-responds-to-the-unified-pixar-movie-th-822973346 www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2a9mfJ9Qqk#t=24 www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=GZ3ez-PIptM#t=328 I'll await for the closing statements to give a more complete review of the truth.