BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The Christian God is Immoral

Sorry I missed a day, Family emergency. Purely responding to your point, Creating something and loving it are two very different things. After all, You seem to be pro abortion. In Greek Mythology, The gods created humanity, And all they did was mess with them. Zeus saw humans as sex slaves and nothing else. There's the King of the Gods for you. Likewise, I don't create stories because I genuinely love the characters; I do it because I'm bored. Why do you daydream? Do you love, Protect, And nurture your daydreams? On the subject of morality. It's subjective, I'm aware. I mentioned it in my opening argument. But I'm sure there's a few things we can both agree on. I don't call ordering a mass kidnapping of females to be raped and forced into marriage moral. I don't call the punishment of rape to be 50 shekels of silver to the victims father moral. I certainly don't call a so called omnipotent and benevolent entity moral with the state of injustice the world is in. So, Contrary to your argument, I don't think he's pretty cool. Sure, He gives us life and stuff, Man, But I think Proverbs 19:21 demonstrates how much in control God is. "Many are the plans in a man's heart, But it is the Lord's purpose that prevails. "
These Characters Can beat Goku

And last but not least :Green lantern:Abilities and Powers:■Fear Projection: Being connected to Parallax, Hal was able of manipulating the Yellow Energy of Fear without the aid of a Qwardian Power Ring. He could create constructs and use them for combat. Hal had immense fear-casting powers, strong enough to easily scare the likes of Superman and Wonder Woman, except those who are capable of understanding and conquering inner fear such as Kyle Rayner and Batman. His powers included hypnosis. ■Reality Manipulation: Hal had the omnipotent ability to alter reality to his own benefit. ■Time Manipulation: Hal could control and travel through time. ■Immortality: The power of Parallax made Hal immortal. ■Immortality: Hal could not be killed in the traditional sense, although he could be harmed through sufficiently powerful means. ■Flight: Hal could fly through the lower atmosphere and outer space at any speed. ■Divine Wrath: Hal had the power to judge souls by their Earthly deeds. ■Sorcery: Being connected to Spectre allowed Hal to perform several acts of magic. ■Cosmic Awareness: Despite lacking omniscience, Hal gained a deep understanding of the inner workings of the universe. ■Immortality: Being connected to the Entity made Hal immortal and unable to be killed through any kind of means. ■Power of Life: As the host of the Entity, Hal was able to manipulate the White Light of Creation and perform many extraordinary feats, such as resurrect dead people.Indigo Ring:■Wormholes & Spacial Warps: Their power grants its wearer access to wormholes in space, enabling the them to rapidly cut time and distance needed for transport. ■Time Travel: Time travel is possible with the powers of the lanterns and Indigo tribe, though the further forward in time they travels, the more willpower it takes. Energy Absorption: The tribe can absorb and store most other energies. Doing so does NOT replenish the normal store of energy they have.They can reflect it back.Flight: By the manipulation of anti-gravitons and directed molecular movement, they can fly at incredible speeds. In atmosphere, an indigo tribal has been known to fly as fast as Mach 10 in atmosphere by creating an aerodynamic envelope around his body. Towing others, usually within a bubble, his/her speed is limited to the twice the speed of sound or 1440 mph. In space,an indigo tribal speed can be significantly greater and has been known to approach 80% of lightspeed in normal space. Flight is possible at velocities exceeding light speed. In atmospheres, air friction is not a hindrance, since heat is either absorbed or reflected by the ring's field.
These Characters Can beat Goku

In reference to future debates you need to be more specific as to the exact form of hulk. If you rank all these characters all on goku, without question they will win. In recognition goku has many other forms, more than hulk. obviously, there are extremely powerful which surpass hulk. Forms1. Goku can transform into Oozaru. This form is when he transforms into a super sized, or consistently called great ape.2. Pre Super Saiyan which is contained before, evolving into Super Sayain3. Super Saiyan, Which during this transformation, goku's power rate doubled4. Ultra Super Saiyan, a form which surpass the Super Sayain Abilities5. Ultra Super Saiyan 2 which is the final Ultra saiyan limit6. Full powered Saiyan, in this form it is a melo state which endures peace without losing power or energy.7. Super Saiyan 2, in this state goku acomodates a large number of energy, endurance, speed, and power8. Super Saiyan 3, has all the powers of his forms, same as Super saiyan 2 but immencly more powerful. Which arcs of aura and electricity9. Super Saiyan 4, this transformation is very different form the rest. Goku has arcs of fire and aura, his hair is black and lenghthend.More information on transformations in other rounds
These Characters Can beat Goku

Are You insane, Goku is the prime, Only the best can dare to challenge him says beat him and by your choosing I don't think they stand a chance. Goku is very cunning and can use his AND your skills in his favor. Goku can find all your weaknesses in a second, and automatically have the advantage. He will never give up or give in, he is a true icon. Jean gray is not even in the question, what can she really do, hop on her magical horse and then.... nothing. Hulk has only one great feature and that is his strength, besides that he is nothing but a green ball. He has no intellectual ability. Which brings me to my next point, the green lantern is truly a waste of time, he flies around using his little to use ring of crap, which without that ring he is just another guy on the street. I will not lie Doctor Strange is one who has a chance, but in my opinion goku will and can find a way to overcome. Goku has faced the worst and never gave up, so what makes it different now. I was supposed to choose one to debate on but I took the challenge of doing all. Good Luck
These Characters Can beat Goku

To whomever decides to take this Debate, he/she will pick one of the Five Characters taken from various comics/stories listed below, whom I will be debating For, and post that as well as any extra Requests in the next argument. Characters (That I am debating for):Spawn (Divine)Jean Gray (Phoenix)Hulk (Any form THAT I choose)Green Lantern (Has indigo ring with him)Doctor StrangeNo limitations to arena.
Restaurants must give calorie counts on their menus

My opponent's points are that calorie counts are useless because everyone is fat. This is wrong because: (A) His evidence is a picture of ketchup (B) Not everyone is fat (C) The idea of calorie counts is to help people get LESS fat. His second point is not understandable and his evidence is a bottle of Char-Sui sauce so this argument (which makes no sense) is not valid. All of my points extend.
Restaurants must give calorie counts on their menus

And by put calorie counts I mean keep calorie counts. Assertion 1:- Helps people make better choices "A study funded by the City of New York that reviewed about 15,000 receipts and surveys from fast-food lunch patrons before and after the city required those restaurants to list calories on menus showed no change in the average calories bought. But 1 in 6 people used the calorie information, and that group purchased an average of 96 fewer calories, an 11% decrease.(1)" "Stanford University used purchasing data at New York, Philadelphia, and Boston Starbucks locations over a 14-month period to compare consumer behavior in restaurants with and without calories on menus. Average calories per purchase fell 6% at restaurants with calorie counts on menus. (The reduction came entirely from food purchases, not drinks.(1)" " A study conducted by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene also found an impact; it said that people who saw the posted calories and used the information in their purchasing decisions "consumed 152 fewer calories at hamburger chains and 73 fewer calories at sandwich shops compared with everyone else," wrote USA Today.(2)" 71% of people say that they want to eat healthier according to a survey taken by Darden Restaurants and calorie counts help people make healthier choices. Assertion 2:- Encourages restaurants to make healthier meals "Lower-calorie sections have been added to menus at many Darden Restaurants in recent years. LongHorn has a "Flavorful Under 500" menu and Olive Garden a "Lighter Italian Fare" section with items under 575 calories. Across all brands, it plans to reduce sodium and calories 10% by 2016 and 20% by 2021. Darden has featured menu calorie counts where mandated by law, about 180 restaurants.(1)" "After years of landing on the annual Xtreme Eating list of high-calorie restaurant food published by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, theCheesecake Factory " is reducing calories in two pasta dishes by using less sauce, says David Overton, founder and chief executive of Cheesecake Factory Inc., a 163-location chain. Next month, the Bistro Shrimp Pasta will fall to 2,440 calories from 2,980, according to the restaurant. The Kids' Pasta with Alfredo Sauce will be 1,290, down from 1,810. "I was sick of winning that prize," says Mr. Overton of the CSPI list." These situations proved that the 2010 law encouraged restaurants to make better choices. Sources: (1)http://online.wsj.com... (2)http://health.usnews.com...
Is Norway one of the most beutifull countries in Europe (it is a stupid argument)

I agree that is beautiful, the snow and ice, I think snow is beautiful. I personally think that snow is the most beautiful substance in the world. but they also have little modern technology and is unpolluted. it is as well a save place to live in. but Norway also has a beautiful city called Oslo, winch is modern. Southern Norway has beautiful flowers and fjords in the summer. their field are full of flowers and they have many warm mountains. In Northern Norway they have winter ALMOST all year. I would move their for the beauty of the snow if I could, but I'm stuck in a place with 100 degree weather.
Is Norway one of the most beutifull countries in Europe (it is a stupid argument)

I am just board. I am Norwegian so I admire Norway. They have beautiful fjords and beautiful mountains. As well Norway has little to no pollution, and has preserved their natural beauty unlike some parts of America. They have beautiful white snow in the winter and it is sunny in the winter! And yes, this is probably one of the stupidest debates ever! So if you like pointless things this is a debate for you! :)
Bush policies were not the main cause of the financial crisis

I am shocked, I tell you shocked, that my opponent has forfeited. He created the account right before posting his first round argument, and has not been on the site since. It is embarrassing to those of a certain political persuasion to have a strong case hanging around as an unaccepted challenge, and one way to get rid of it is to create an account, accept the challenge, post either no response or a lame response, and then forfeit. I cannot be certain that's what happened, but it fits the pattern. My opponent really did not debate the resolution and effectively conceded. I refuted each of his points, to which he had no response. If anyone would like to do a serious debate on this topic, let me know and I'll post the challenge to them.
Mars One is a great step for Human therefore everybody should have a chance

First I want to start my argument with the describing the current candidate selection model. As their website stated, there will be 4 rounds in the selection process. First round; a list of candidates chosen from the application list base on their video and application form. Second round; a medical check. Third round; selection by the public on TV. Round 4; ability to survive in harsh environment. The current model of the candidate selection will only favours the one who can win more popularity rather than actual skills which fits for the task. As Mars one believe this is an important step for humankind; but their way of choosing the right candidate seems to be a marketing tool to gain publicity rather than selecting the right person for the right job. Here come my first point of argument, these "chosen ones" may not necessary understand what real challenges they will face for this task, their mental ability or physical ability may causes the failure of the task or even death of themselves. My second point is the pressure from the public may force these chosen candidates to make the wrong decisions. After years of training, some candidates may have second thoughts for this venture, however because they have been on the news and shown faces to the public, it will make them feel pressure to quit but have to keep going for this task. My third point is the task should be carry out by professionally trained militaries or agents. It is because in terms of carry out orders, these professional have been trained to control their emotions and are carry orders as they were told. It is much easier for Mars One to manage and more likely in success of the project
Mars One is a great step for Human therefore everybody should have a chance

For challenger who may not know what Mars-one is, Mars one is an organization which plan to send human being to mars in by 2023 and establish a human settlement outside Earth. . http://applicants.mars-one.com... I believe the Mars One Project was a great idea and a big step for human beings. However, I believe the candidate for the project should be carefully picked rather than an equal opportunity for all human to proof their ambitions and win the public. The task of establishing human colony in another planet should be carried out by well trained professionals but not anyone who was favor by the public. I believe this project had created unnecessary hope for many individuals and some of these individuals may not really understand the difficult of this task. My debate position is I agree with the idea of settling human in another planet but I believe the task should be carried by well-trained professionals which understand their risk and challenges they may face for this task.
Supreme Court Justice's should have life terms

In Round 1, I think you may have forgotten that we all die at some point and time. The way you were saying "If they didn't have life terms who knows what would happen five minutes later." Well, if a Justice is 94 years old and in Court one day, drops over dead with a heart attack or stroke because their body is shutting down, there will probably be some issues. Let the Justices have 5 or 10 year term lengths.
Supreme Court Justice's should have life terms

Serving for life is absurd. Once appointed by the Senate, our constitution states in Article III, Section I that "The judges both of the Supreme and Inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior." The term "Good Behavior" is interpreted to mean that judges can serve for the rest of their lives; however, they can resign or retire voluntarily. In 2008, at 72 YEARS OLD, Justice Gingsburg fell asleep during oral arguments. She fell asleep. Also, let's refer back to Justice Douglas, who had a stroke, later returned back to his duty instead of retiring and news reports show that he often fell asleep on the bench and was so disoriented that the justices decided not to decide any cases in which his vote would matter. These two examples are very good reasons why a set amount of time should be allowed instead of a lifetime. Who knows what kind of shape this country would be in if we had better and younger Supreme Court Justices in the Court. Justices need to have a set amount of time to serve because not many people are going to resign from a job that gives you $208,100 a year.
Supreme Court Justice's should have life terms

Yes, because the Supreme Court Justice is a very, very serious court that judges serious issues. Therefore if they don't have life terms, it couldn't be a fair judging the serious issues. These issues make a huge impact on today's society and decide laws for the U.S. If they didn't have life terms who knows what would happen five minutes later. Also the con side never really made arguments they just said that they shouldn't not why they shouldn't therefore their not debating in the least bit.
SHould schools be based on IQ levels

this does not solve the social divide that would be caused by a separation based on an individuals IQ as I stated above, also as you stated above many people who are very smart do not work hard. Why should a kid who does not work hard but has a higher IQ receive the benefits of going to a better school receiving a better job in which you make more money. Also don't you think people would benefit more if people with lower IQs went to the same school as people with higher IQs that way the kids who have higher IQs would be able to help the kids with lower IQs better understand the material they are learning that way everyone benefits. how would you prevent this from causing a social divide?
SHould schools be based on IQ levels

Actually the 3 topics are: spatial ability, memory and mathematical ability. Some of the kids that are not getting good grades are actually really smart some of them are just really bored in class. The lower IQs have different gifts like physical etc. But that is no reason for them to bring down the people iwith higher IQs. Also by doing classes by IQ this is also a way to break down the age barrier. No one would care if you were 13 or 15 you are in their class and that is that. It is also a great way for students to excel. THey can really show their true potential with IQ divided classes.
SHould schools be based on IQ levels

the separation is not as large as it would be in the event that schools where separated by IQ level. Right now regardless of IQ all people still receive equal opportunity if a kid works hard regardless of IQ he to could go to a better school of higher education. IQ tests do not mean you are limited there are plenty of people with low IQs that have still been able to go to great schools because of hard work. Also many kids with low IQs excel in certain fields such as music, and art; for example there is a kid who can hear a song once and remember it perfectly word for word note for note and can play it back on a piano which he is remarkably gifted at playing, this very same child would be incapable of doing basic arithmetic. If schools where separated based on IQ people like this would never be giving recognition. For example on an IQ test there are 3 separate areas on which you are graded correct me if I am wrong I believe these are speed, verbal/vocabulary, and memory. In speed I only had a 88-90, in memory I had a 100 and in verbal/vocabulary in other words how well I articulated my ideas I had a 120 IQ. Meaning that if you assembled a crowd of 100 people only 5 in that crowd would score 120 in this section.
SHould schools be based on IQ levels

I understand what you mean but the people with the higher IQ would have more chances and if the lower IQs were very determined they could be bumped up to a higher IQ class. I know what it is like to have a higher IQ level than the rest of the class and I would have loved to have had the chance to go to a school like this when I went to school. WE already kind of have the IQ level separation. Most people with lower IQs tend to go to college and the Higher IQs go to university like me.
SHould schools be based on IQ levels

Since those with higher IQs would go to better schools they would ultimately gain better jobs and make more money while those with lower IQs would be discriminated against and giving terrible jobs with very little income. This would create a divide because many people would be discriminated against and judged by there IQ regardless of how hard they are willing to work. The people with higher IQs would be cruel to those with lower IQs causing resentment violence and possibly even genocide. In other words people below a certain IQ would be liquidated because they would be deemed unbeneficial to society.
Pro Affirmitive Action

Affirmative action has been around for ever. The only thing that has changed is who is benefited from it in the beginning whites and now racial and gender minorities. The problem is without affirmative action no public or private source would be able to endorse meritocracy throughout the world. African Americans make about 36% of the work force and with the birth rate , it is projected by the year 2050 that there will be no racial minorities. Affirmative Action helps the workplace. More than 60 leading 500 fortune companies agree that diversity is good. During Grutter v. Bollinger those 60 companies and civilian leaders of the Army,Navy,Air Force, and Marine Corps urged the court to uphold the limited consideration of race. While communities of color have made great strides in closing the education gap, disparities in higher education remain prevalent. Whites in 2009 were 13% over represented at the most selective schools.people in america are still prejudice towards other minorities. The man who built the third faction of the KKK was a congressman. Affirmative Action started helping white woman in 1974 and affirmative action is helping the economy. According to the Bureau of Justice Assistance and the Office of juvenile Justice and Delinquency prevention African Americans are more likely to get caught in gangs and gang related crimes. Affirmative Action is helping cure prejudice. people think Race-neutral policies are detrimental to the next generation are false. Research shows that race-neutral policies simply don't work. A study conducted by UCLA school of law found that after using a class-based admission system, enrollment of African Americans and Native Americans fell by more than 70%. Diversity in the workforce fosters innovation and competitiveness in business. In a Forbes survey, 85 percent of respondents said diversity is crucial for their business, and approximately 75 percent indicated that their companies will put more focus during the next three years to leverage diversity to achieve their business goals. In the United States of America separate and unequal and falling apart we need to united as a whole. When people start giving more value to certain people we start to realize that we should all be created and when someone thinks that they have a higher value then things become chaotic. So lets be united and together and equal and help one another.