belief=nothing

If my opponent is not going to respond to my argument then I will keep it shorter this time.REBUTTALS You: Are things false?Me: Yes, but not everything is false. Just because some things are false it doesn't mean that everything is and belief means nothing. You: Do you find a lie in reality?Me: This question is very brief and no examples have been provided. At the moment my answer is no but if Pro defines this argument then it will be easier to respond to this.You: Information=nothing=separation=0Me: Information is the opposite of nothing. I don't understand how nothing or information have anything to do with separation. I will define what you have said to put this into perspective.Information: "facts provided or learned about something or someone"Nothing: "not anything"Separation: "the action or state of moving or being moved apart."You have not provided me with anything that proves that these things are equal to each other. Here is what the equasion actually means:Fact = nothing = being moved apart = 0 This statement clearly doesn't make any sense. If you can provide me with an example then this argument could be valid but since Pro has not elaborated this argument will have to remain invalide until me opponent can justify his argument properly.You: Thoughts dosn't exist in reality, thoughts are not real."Me: You may notice that I have fixed the grammar in this sentence because when you posted it, it was not capitalized and no full stops of apostrophes where used. You claim that thoughts do not exist in reality. That is a huge claim to make and I cannot discuss this further without any evidence provided by Pro. Pro has also claimed that thoughts are not real. This is something I discussed both in a philosophical and scientific point of view. I will pick out a few quotes for Pro to reflect upon and then I will state my case. "If it were possible to map out the exact pattern of brain waves that give rise to a person’s momentary complex of awareness, that mapping would only explain the physical correlate of these experiences, but it wouldn’t be them. A person doesn’t experience patterns, and her experiences are as irreducibly real as her brain waves are, and different from them.""Subjective consciousness, if it is not reducible to something physical, … would be left completely unexplained by physical evolution—even if the physical evolution of such organisms is in fact a causally necessary and sufficient condition for consciousness."Thoughts are real Thoughts have substance. Your thoughts produce proteins, the bodies building blocks, which form real structures that change the landscape of your brain. The thoughts we think grow branches on nerve cells in the brain. These nerve cells which looks like trees. Scientists have therefore called these nerve cells ‘The Magic Trees of the Mind’ because they look like a forest of trees under the microscope. Our thoughts shape these ‘trees’. Our thoughts therefore determine what our brain becomes. Our quality of life depends on what our brain has become. I hope that Pro reads and understands what I have said and I hope that he will respond in more depth this time.Sourceshttp://www.newyorker.com...https://www.google.co.uk...https://www.google.co.uk... https://www.google.co.uk...;