The homicdal gas chamber at Auschwitz are not gas chambers

The photos of the delousing chambers show blue stains on brick. Brick is red because it contains iron oxide. The Auschwitz "homicidal" gas chamber walls are also made of the same bricks the delousing chambers were. Here, you can see Prussian Blue staining of the stucco inside the delousing chamber: http://img130.imageshack.us... So I don't know what point you are trying to get to. Pro argues that 300 PPM is sufficient to kill one human, but not many humans. That argument is obviously wrong, I obtained the mean values for residual wall cyanide from the Leuchter and Rudolf data sets, and then divide them in three groups[1]: 1. Delousing chambers: 4960 ± 3800 (n=15) ppm 2. Alleged Homicidal chamber: 2.7 ± 2.7 (n=16) ppm 3. Controls (ie sampled from barracks, wash rooms, etc.): 1.7 ± 1.3 (n=11) ppm This means that 15 samples from delousing chambers had nearly 5,000 PPM of residual wall cyanide, 16 from the alleged homicidal gas chamber averaged 3PPM, while the 11 from the "controls" averaged nearly 2 PPM. Even the absurdly low value of 300 PPM asa lethal dose for hundreds of people you just cannot end up with no significant elevation of residual wall cyanide in such chambers, ESPECIALLY after repeated use... compared to the delousing cambers where you have several thousand times more residue! Based on the 27 measured samples of wall iron cyanide, there was no significant difference between the samples from the alleged homicidal chambers and from the control samples. Then there are many other points: 1. The official story alleges massive one after the other gassings, 500,000 people were allegedly gassed in Krema II alone, so that would mean at least 2,000 per gassing. For there to be no massive residue is unlikely. 2. Holocaust believers also say that Zyklon-B was inserted into the alleged gas chambers via wire-mesh insertion columns. Zyklon-B works most efficiently when it is heated and spread out over a large surface where air can reach it so the cyanide can be released from it. This however would not happen if it was restrained by these devices because the wire mesh contraptions would cause the Zyklon-B to be bunched together, therefore just making it a time consuming process. 3. Why even use Zyklon-B? The alleged diesel exhaust gas chambers at Treblinka were apparently more capable because in a years time it supposedly killed around 870,000 people, not to mention at Treblinka they managed to dispose of all these bodies without the use of expensive crematories by burying them in mass graves.... which of course do not exist (as gassings in Treblinka never happened). 4. "Obviously, both values differ enormously, i.e. the LD100 value is frequently much higher than the LD1 value. When talking about the quantity necessary to kill lice, the literature uses the LD100 value, because we want to make sure to kill all of them, whereas when dealing with security risks of humans, the LD1 or even lower values are used to make sure that no human is being killed. Therefore, it does not make sense to compare both values with each other: A louse in bad shape can be killed by only 0,03% hydrogen cyanide, as it is very well possible that a smart and healthy human can survive a 5 minute exposure to 1% of hydrogen cyanide. Finally, it is quite a difference if one has inhaled an amount of poison that is lethal, or if one has already died. Though the threshold value of some 100 mg of a soluble cyanide salt (or 300 ppm of HCN in the air) may most likely kill most people, it can actually take very long until one is dead. On the other hand, if one wants to kill or die quickly, one has to apply a big overdose to achieve that with certainty."[4] Pro notes execution chambers used in the U.S. employed ten times the lethal concentration, and goes on to claim that the high dose is required for quick lethality My point was is that it kills faster and more effectively. Pro asks why there was blue staining on the walls of a chamber at a different site. I suspect that's because the pain there had iron in it. Notice that the floor has no blue stain. Why is that? I would explain that as a consequence of there being no iron in the floor cement, and perhaps also some additional affect of cleaning akin to weathering. Prussian blue does not dissolve in water, but it enters into a colloidal suspension that can be washed away. Majdanek's gas chamber walls and Auschwitz alleged homicidal gas chamber walls are both of brick. But my point is is that if the reason there isn't cyanide residue in Auschwitz because it takes less cyanide residue to kill humans than lice, then wh does the alleged homicidal gas chamber in Majdanek - which was used to (allegedly) kill humans - have Prussian blue saining? The purpose is to evoke the emotions, and the chimney s an unrelated symbol of Auschwitz. It's all about evoking emotions to get people to believe in the gas chamber myth. Emotional control is a very powerful method of control. By the way, Auschwitz tour guides claim that the chimney + the homicidal gas chamber was NOT reconstructed after the war. It was only until David Cole had interviewed former Auschwitz curator Franciszek Piper that it was revealed it was renovated after the war.[5] However, the IFR did find cyanide traces in some gas chamber sites, including the Block 11 site Pro held as certainly not a gas chamber, and no traces of cyanide in any of the living quarters. For routine fumigations, not mass murder. Rudolf refuted the IFR so much they didn't even respond to him - why is that? Not to mention Rudolf has been pretty much made a CRIMINAL because of his beliefs. He spent years in jail just because he said there was a lack of cyanide in the chamber. This means the people persecuting him have something to hide. According to the UN Declaration of Human Rights Article 19: " Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." Of course, what the UN forgot to mention is the "Cannot Criticize Jews" clause. If you dare question the Holocaust, you go to jail in many European and non-European countries. This is the same as the Catholic Church putting Galileo under arrest for his discoveries. Also, why did Auschwitz claim 4 million victims before 1989, then after 1989 claimed 1.5 milion (now down to 1.1 million)? http://img607.imageshack.us... You can see there Rudolf Hoess also claimed 3 million victims - a far cry from 1.1 million. So why hasn't the official Jewish death toll went from 6 million to 3.1 million to 3.5 million? I will be unable to respond in full to Pressac, due to my limitations of what I can say now, but I would like to see 3 of the documents you claim Pressac presents so I can see for myself, because I cannot comment on their legitimacy without seeing them. Thank you. I am now out of space and can no longer reply, so I will try and go into more detail on Pressac and Kremer next time. 1. http://www.codoh.com... 2. http://www.codoh.info... 3. http://www.codoh.com... 4. http://www.vho.org... The lethal dose 100%, LD100, which gives the concentration or quantity of poison required to kill all (100%) individuals of an observed species. This value is used to make sure that all individuals are successfully killed. The lethal dose 1%, LD1, which gives the concentration or quantity of poison required to kill 1% of all individuals of an observed species. This value is used to mark a threshold beyond which an exposition to that poison is definitively dangerous." 5. http://www.vho.org...