Torture

1.)Torture is the intentional infliction of extreme physical suffering on some non-consenting defenseless, other person for the purpose of breaking that will. 2.)Moral is the distinction code of rules of what kind of behavior is acceptable or unacceptable. 3.)Minimal is a small amount of an object or content. 4.)Torture can be used to gain information in. 5.)The information that one might have, may be dangerous for others. 6.)Dangerous is where a human may be risking their life. 7.)Terrorists can be tortured if they obtained information about an attack that will happen. 8.)Polices can torture an individual if they are certain that the individual has information about an innocent victim who may be in danger. 9.)A kidnapper can be tortured because the innocent may be in danger and only the kidnapper knows where the innocent is hidden. 10.)Accidentally killing someone is not questioned about being morally yet why is torturing someone questioned. 11.)The person who is being captured can easily just do what the torturer is asking for. 12.)If one says the truth and that person might be in danger then the torturer protects him in anyway. 13.)There are some instances that are minimally, morally justified torture. Non-Controversial " 1.)First premise cannot be said otherwise because it states the definition of torture. My opponent would also state the definition of torture. 3.)The statement cannot be controversial because there is only one definition of minimally. Minimally can only mean a small amount of anything. Controversial " 2.)The second premise states the definition of moral which can be said otherwise because moral can be viewed in many different ways. Meaning anyone can interrupt moral in many different point of views. Yet the definition I have given seems very accurate to me. 4.)Torture is not necessarily used to gain information; it can be used for many things. Such as revenge or to cause pain for an individual. For example, someone can take revenge on someone by causing torture on someone. Yet it is the most effective and faster way to gain something that is really desired. 5.)The reason why this statement can be controversial is because the information that an individual may have is not necessarily dangerous for others. There can be information that has nothing to do with innocent people being in danger. For example someone may torture another person just to find out the truth about their past. But what would happen if someone is in dangerous and the person who is being torture does not want to give up the information, then that would mean that the innocent person is in danger. 6.)This statement can be controversial because there are many other definitions for dangerous. There can may different ways to define "dangerous" 7.)Terrorists can give up the information; torture does not necessarily have to be present. It can be the case where the terrorists may think about it twice and decide not to perform any dangerous thing towards innocents. 8.)This statement might be controversial because polices may find another way for them to gain the information. Polices are not supposed to torture suspects because it is against the law. 9.) This statement may be controversial because my opponent can state that the polices can have more security and investigate every clue that there is. Meaning that torture is not always the answer. 10.) My opponent might question why is that killing might be involved with torturing because the fact that the killing is not justified does not necessarily mean that torture should be. Also, they may ask to define exactly what is accidentally. 11.)This statement may be controversial because what if a person might not want to give up that easily. It can come to the point that the person who is being torturer might want to die rather than giving up. Anything can go through the mind of the person who is being tortured there are many scenarios where the torture thinks about it twice and gives the victim another chance.