Any female wearing immodest clothing wants to have her rape fantasy fulfilled.

I once again appreciate your full level of engagement in this debate, Accompanied by your swift response in each debate. It is surely a joy to have participants who are polite enough to show such level of commitment to a debate. I also agree that we have spent quite a lot of space and time in relation to shaming and its definition. Also, In my opinion, The part regarding shame was not much central to our motion. Therefore, I agree that with you that we can bypass shame. As for the "movement" that you referred to, I agree on the facts that such movement a) has happened; b) is happening; and c) is dying out lately. Now, I am not disputing its having taken place, Since, Of course, I do not and cannot re-write the history. Rather, My rebuttals regarding the movement were a) if its proclaimed "resistance" truly meant resistance, Since the method of resistance only further reinforced the sexual stimulus and attraction from males, Which the whole movement claimed to resist and wanted to desist, And; b) if such manner of "resistance" was ever effective, As it only heightened their chance of getting raped, An act which they proclaimed to put a stop through their movement. I think I should have much more clarified these points further in the previous rounds; I apologize not having done so. Thank you for pointing this weak part of my argument. Now, For those cliches about rape that you and I agree feminists tritely bring up: a) men should be able to control their urges: This is the is/ought question. Of course there are many things we should control ourselves about - we should not kill, Cheat, Lie, Deceive, And the list is endless. Sure, He should not have raped and she should not have been raped; but he did and she did. The point is not shoulda/coulda/woulda; all these conditionals and hypothetical situations is irrelevant and therefore meaningless with regard to facts of life, Which is that there are many things we should not do but we do, And in this case, That he raped her and she got raped. We do rape, Universally and timelessly - in fact, Rape is what I call one popular kind of many universal and timeless sexual activities. This is a fact of life and reality. b) flaunt what you have: Actually, I am not against people flaunting what they have. Go ahead. But they have been warned about the probability of exposing themselves to danger they so much undesire, And such act of flaunting can and will meaningfully increase their chance of receiving what they hate receiving. In short, Flaunt your sexiness; and take your chance at getting raped. She who does not exercise even the fundamental caution needs and deserves to pay for her own stupidity. c)rape is not a vicitm's fault: Her acts of exposing your body, Attracting other people's attention, Stimulating their sexual cravings, While knowing that some of them may not or cannot exercise self-constraint. Sometimes, She did really ask for it and got what she asked for. Your gratitude for me not having recited a line from the bible is well appreciated. As someone who leans against Islam, Yet not a complete muslim, I try very hard not to apply biblical references to any random argument like some christians dot; that is what I consider as blasphemous, Really. It has been a great pleasure debating with you, And I wish you great happy new year.