Free Market Is Overall a Better System than Socialism (Part 2)

Thanks for your patience, So, my opening argument is this. Free market capitalism is the fairest system, no forced wealth redistribution, which means no theft by means of taxes, absolutely no coercive government acts, no one forcing you to do anything because you own yourself. This is a much more healthy philosophy than how most socialist states ended up, the people in these systems just became a tool for the government and/or the community. The fundamental belief behind the free market is that you own yourself, you arenot obliged to give money to anyone else, nor are you obliged to recieve money from someone elses pockets, however you may, if you wish give money voluntarily to charities then that is fine. As taxation isa large part of most socialist states I will now state my problem with it. My and most peoples definition of stealing is- taking someone elses property without consent and/or by means of force Taxation is by nature taking money that people own, whether they consent or not and if you dont consent they will lock you in a cell. This sounds frighteningly like the definition of theft am I right? Free markets provide better services than socialism, I find it quite funny that a lot of these socialists, after ranting about capitalism, go home and play on their xbox's that wouldn't exist if we lived in a socialist state, they use their phones, their televisions, their laptops, computers. These are all products that were invented because of capitalism, if socialism was implemented there would be no need for these products because there would be no businesses. I have some more arguments but I will save them for your rebuttals Rebuttals- "This means that all schools would be private and for profit which would deny access to education from lower income families and others unable to afford the tuition. This would not only increase the economic disparity but also the poverty rate." This is answered through practice, the closest thing to a free market in practice is New Hampshire, they have minute tax amounts and encourage privatisation, and social programs that re funded through stolen money to be replaced with a system where these services are provided by private companies. Heres the link to all of the sources, they have the lowest percentage of poverty, 1st for child well-being, there is also a section that explains about schools, they have some quality education and etc. the list goes on read for yourself https://freestateproject.org... "Corporations simply do not care about what they do to their workers or towards others, their sole purpose and goal is to make more money. I have already mentioned in the previous debate about how major Multinational corporations such as Shell and Nestle commit multiple human rights violations simply to make more money and I am at no shortage of examples of these Transnationals." Please read this and watch the video attached. www.ancapfaq.com/business-ethics-2-1.html "In the Nordic countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland) their is a universal to free post-secondary education and healthcare, along with no tuition fees students are received a monthly grant to help cover living expenses" For a start you cant use examples of americas children to represent free market capitalism as the system in place right now in america is crony capitalism which is a mixture of government and corporations which as Mussolini said gives you fascism. Regardless these so called free services arent free thwy are paid for by stolen money, I dont know about anyone else but when I look at a successful country I dont look at the one that steals from its citizens the most. I look forward to your counter argument Also a fun fact here are some socialist states - Communist Russia, North Korea, Nazi Germany just saying.