Is being "Offended" bullsh!t

Your situation is perfectly fine. It's capitalism in action. Humans should have the right to be offended by whatever they want. This is how capitalism works. It is called "Supply and Demand" (1). The parent has a demand for a game for their child to enjoy that does not include some behaviors that they do not want their child to be exposed to at a young age. You have the ability to make video games. You supply them with the game in exchange for a monetary amount. If your game doesn't give them what they want, they won't buy from you anymore. You have the option to offend them, and you have the option not to offend them. They have the option to buy your product, and they have the option to be offended and not buy your product. You can offend whoever you want, and it's perfectly fine if the person you are offending is offended because they are giving you money for your product. You can't force them to like your product, and you can't force them to have moral standards that your product lives up to. I do not support your game being banned, but that is not what this debate is about. It's about whether it's okay to be offended. If offended people refuse to buy your game because you didn't give them the type of game they wanted, good for them. You just went out of business because you offended people. The market regulated itself, and your product wasn't good enough for the market. You had the knowledge that your game would probably offend people, you chose to not change anything, and your business was a failure because of it. Let's make this simpler to understand. Let's say you were an ice cream company. Let's say I hate chocolate ice cream. It tastes so bad that it offends me. Is that a problem? No. You just should make another type of ice cream if you want me as a customer. Let's say I'm in the majority, and let's say most people don't like chocolate. Is it wrong that you won't get a good business going if you don't make another kind of ice cream? You can choose to be stubborn and make only chocolate. Then you can choose to be angry when your business fails because you do not supply the product that people want. As long as the government doesn't force you to make a different kind of ice cream, this situation is fine. You can do whatever you want, but you shouldn't complain when you don't have a job because of it. As I see it, a customer being offended by a product that they buy from you is perfectly fine. You have their money, but they will never buy from you again. It isn't your business what offends them. It isn't the government's business what offends them. As long as the government doesn't force you to make products that don't offend others, it's fine for others to be offended by you.2. Your argument is void of logic because you're being offended by those who you complain about the fact that they are offended by you. Your tone seems very angry towards those who do not like your game. Why is that? Do you think that you know better than they do? Why is it that you feel the need to judge them because they have a certain moral opinion while you expect them not to be offended by your moral opinion? You are being hypocritical here. Of course they can be offended by you because the ability to be offended is a basic right. People should be able to make choices, and the final decision of what's right and wrong isn't determined by you or your customers. Thank you for a fun first round. Remember to use proper grammar next round. (1) . http://www.investopedia.com...