Exodus the Palestinians to the West Bank from Gaza. Kill Hamas Leader.

Hello Pro. I would like to thank Pro for this interesting topic. I will be arguing against evacuating all of the Palestinians from the West Bank. My arguments in this round will mostly be in refutation; I will quote my opponent, and then respond. "God promised..."My opponent needs to demonstrate why the Old Testament should be a legitimate document for settling territorial disputes. The Old Testament is unreliable, historically inaccurate, and, frankly, old. Just because the Old Testament says something does not mean that Israel has a legitimate claim to Gaza. Also, taking this argument to its logical conclusion, would you not have to evacuate the West Bank as well? This is against other religious claims [4], and would cause an even greater humanitarian crisis, as millions of poor refugees are forced in other countries, disrupting regional stability. "They need what they got."Why? Why does Israel deserve territorial expansion, when Palestinians live in much poorer and population-dense conditions [1]? If anybody deserves more territory, from a humanitarian standpoint, it is clearly the Palestinians. "Why can't a fellow Muslim sister take them in?"Around 2.5 million Palestinians live in the West Bank [2], in highly dense and poor conditions [3]. There are around 1.9 million Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip [2]. Note that a vast, vast minority of these are children under 18%. This means that forced relocation of the Gaza Strip would create a humanitarian crisis, as an already-impoverished West Bank could not absorb a near-doubling of its population. This would only reinforce the cycle of poverty taking place in Palestine, in addition to galvanizing and radicalizing the Palestinian population against Israel.I. Security RiskBeyond rebuttal, I would like to point out something obvious. A forced relocation of Gazans has two key security risks to Israel:1) The idea that Israel could somehow evacuate 1.9 million Palestinians peacefully from Gaza, when they are already facing very stiff opposition from militants within, is comical. Israel would be facing an all-out war, as everyday Palestinians are forced to side with Hamas in Gaza, just to protect their homes. 2) Israel would, then, assuming this evacuation could actually occur, be moving Hamas, its militants, and its arms from a distant Gaza to a far more dangerous West Bank. This means that Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Haifa are at a significantly higher risk of missile attacks from Hamas or other militants. This seems like a very poor security position. ConclusionMy opponent claims, without argument, that Israel deserves Gaza because the Old Testament says so. While he first needs to prove this is relevant, he also needs to demonstrate how this could possibly be done in a peaceful and ethical fashion. I have demonstrated that the Old Testament is not a relevant guide to settling territorial disputes, that relocation would spur a humanitarian crisis, and that relocation poses severe security risks to Israel. Thank you, and I look forward to future arguments. Sources:1. http://mondoweiss.net...2. http://www.jpost.com...3. http://www.washingtoninstitute.org...4. http://www.aish.com...