The Existence Of Everything Including Life Is Unavailing WIthout God

"I will negate the resolution by showing that a belief or concept of God is not necessary." Or so you think you will, that is quite arrogant of you to type "I will negate the resolution...", as if you will win. "Since my opponent is Pro, he needs to show, beyond doubt, that "The Existence Of Everything Including Life Is Unavailing without God." On the flip side, I will negate the resolution by showing that a belief or concept of God is not necessary. Pro started this debate under the assumption that there is actually a God. Normally, I wouldn't place the burden on someone to prove God's existence, but based on the fact that his entire resolution is based on God's existence, in order to affirm it he first needs to prove that God exists." Read the Comments Section, the original count for my response was over 15,000 words, I had to put my argument for God there so I could keep my other texts. "There are many people who live useful and successful lives without accepting the existence of a God. I, for one, do not feel comfortable assuming that nearly 46 million Americans lead useless or unsuccessful lives even though the don't acknowledge the existence of God. It's a very foolish position to take, and is currently the position Pro is trying to argue for." If a person believes that the world & Universe was caused by nothing for nothing for no reason and reject the existence of God, what justifies that belief? How can something come from nothing? Even in mathematics, this idea is rejected since anything divided by zero is undefined (to divide means to separate something into multiple classes/categories), this violates Science and Logic itself because this not only is physically impossible, but the a Law of Thought/Logic called the Principle of Sufficient Reason as explained in my argument for God. What's "foolish" is believing something czar cause it's own existence from nothing and create life from non-life (abiogenesis) and that event causation can occur without an agent. The ball was rolling down the street, someone had to make the ball in order for it to move and wind which is essentially a flow of gasses which is made up by particles that move around & act on their own? Just because something does not grow or reproduce, doesn't mean it cannot be alive or use energy since we need that to survive. Also I never asked you if you were comfortable with saying anyone who didn't believe in a higher power or not, I did not intend this discussion to be about how you feel whether comfortable or not and if my position is foolish, instead of forming a conjecture, use evidence to support your belief and explain why. "This is where Pro's burden comes into play. Now that I've presented numbers from a well-respected organization, my opponent has the burden of showing just how each of these 46 million Americans necessarily lead unsuccessful or useless lives." When did I mention that the lives of those who do not believe in God are unsuccessful? I did not type that their lives are useless either, I typed that living has no purpose without God, not that those Atheists' lives are useless (which anyone could conclude I mean they're better dead) which is not true. Living just to live is not a reason and doesn't explain why you enjoy living. Your death will have no meaning when you are forgotten (in a world/Universe without God, as if such nonsense is possible), everything you did when you were alive did not save you from your destruction, going to the movies or some worldly activity just to do it before you die is irrational because it serves no purpose at all in helping you, oh by the way you're still going to die. The Nihilists would be right if a Godless Universe was one we lived in, but that is not the case and if I have to, I will defend God from anyone until I die. "For example, Stephen Hawking is an atheist, and yet he is very successful and has lived a very useful life!" Not just for himself either, but actually the entire world has benefited from his scientific discoveries which led to him receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom among countless other awards. [5] In a Godless world, he and everyone would still die regardless about your opinions about the man and a "successful life" is irrelevant to the topic at hand and also an argument from ignorance unless you lived his life and had knowledge of all his problems that he is, has and will encounter in the future. Just because he might be "successful financially" does not mean things like domestic/personal issues may not be affecting his mental/physical wellbeing, to be successful in living a affluent but stressful life (hypothetically) is not a successful one, and that's just one possibility out of many. There are literally countless atheists and agnostics who lead successful and useful lives, for the sake of space, I'll simply share a compilation of 25 of them, all of whom are highly distinguished, successful and have provided the world with useful accomplishments. Irrelevant. A cure for penal cancer, "OMFGNOWAYISTHISREALLIFERIGHTNOW?!", you are still going to die and never experience life (according to atheists) ever again and death is unavoidable. Life to an Atheist who believes in no afterlife & knows of the awful world which we live and has some form of intelligence will come to this realization as well. All that remains for Atheists and the worldly inhabitants of this planet is a life full of carnal pleasures which they will never get to enjoy again after their lifespan has expired. "I can't believe my opponent is actually saying the "existence of everything"." I didn't "say" that, I typed that and if you can't believe it, inspect the evidence there and believe because it happened. This begs the question "why does anything & everything exist?", without a reason, there can be no purpose and all that's left to describe everything in general as a temporary pleasure/pass time before you die where you will not be conscious at all. "I feel my opponent fails to realize that the strive to survive in life is always avoiding death (unless someone desires suicide, in which case they embrace death)." What you feel is irrelevant also, I have already mentioned that avoiding death is what people do and I've already explained how stupid it is to strive to survive while believing you're going to die (except you just want to postpone the moment of your demise) just to live longer and everything you've done in your life will ultimately (at the end of your life and those after you) not change the fact you will still die. This site now restricts me to only 7,000 words per reply on this debate, I shall post the remainder on the comments like I did with my argument for God's existence.