Heaven is real

Heaven is a place where God is suppose to dwell and where we will go after death assuming we match the criteria for going there (being saved, being a moral person, ect)I shall use Oxford's definitionHeaven: a place regarded in various religions as the abode of God (or the gods) and the angels, and of the good after death, often traditionally depicted as being above the sky.Pro's states there isn't any proof heaven is real outside the bible, he has yet to demonstrate the bible is true, so he it cannot be said that he has fulfilled his burden of proof. He states there isn't any proof God isn't real, however since Pro is making the claim the burden of proof is on him. Con need only Nonetheless, I will present an argument attacking the concept that there is a heaven. I will attempt to demonstrate that once we are dead, we are dead. There is no other place anyone's minds or souls will go to. If this is true, then there is no heaven, as heaven is defined as a place where people's identities go after death. I will be extrapolating the argument from a previous debate of mine [http://www.debate.org...]Why Heaven doesn't Exist.When thinking about the requirements for a theory of personal identity which is compatible with an afterlife we come to two possible explanations. We either have something in common with the spiritual or something which can be recreated in the spiritual.The first idea is that the content of our consciousness (memories, ect) is what makes us the same person over time and is reconstructed in heavenly material. This allows for physicalist ontologies of the mind (the view that the mind is physical) because the material of a person is irrelevant, only the content. The other is a dualist view, that we have something already in common with the spiritual because we posses a soul. The soul is what makes us "us" overtime and is simply transferred into heaven when we die. Both of these are problematic.Problems with ReconstructionismTwo people can have the same psychology. If for some reason the commander of the afterlife, like God messed up and created you now, it clearly wouldn’t be you. After all, two people cannot be identical to the same person.Let’s say, I die and my psychology is reconstructed in the afterlife. But, at the same time my psychology is also reconstructed on a computer, what would’ve happened to me?Psychology doesn’t need to be unique to individuals and therefore, a psychological constructionist view of the afterlife is false.Problems with DualismAnother view is dualism. When you go to the afterlife, your nonphysical identity goes to a nonphysical place. This is the conception that your soul “floats up” to the afterlife.Since I’ve demonstrated identity doesn’t lay in facts about psychology, the question comes up how exactly does the soul preserve identity? What makes my soul and your soul different? It cannot be facts about psychology or facts about the physical. It asserts it preserves identity without explaining how.What would happen if our souls switched? Nothing about our consciousness or bodies would change, but we would be different people. There doesn’t seem there would be any difference whatsoever. There could be constant soul switchings and we’d never know. As William James said“A difference which makes no difference is no difference at all.” [http://www.quoteyard.com...]A dualist theory of identity cannot explain identity in the first place.We cannot get to the afterlife by being reconstructed or by being “carried up”, but since an afterlife is a realm where individual's identity goes, then there cannot be an afterlife. As an individual's identity cannot go to any other realm.Now to Pro.