Same-sex marriage

I'm sorry, I missed the last round, it just escaped my mind, and I was half expecting some sort of email reminder situation being sent to me. You know, I'm not sure how to argue you anymore. I use essentially the entire 8000 characters allotted and you only address a few sentences with a few paragraphs, with spacing to make it seem larger than it really it, your responses I mean. I feel like you are not completely behind your issue. It seems to me that you like to re-word your responses quite a bit as you don't have any other arguments or something. I come with things on my own and I'm actually FOR same-sex marriage! STILL, I can't figure out what it has to do with ANY political office or the government, or the president or senators or anything at all government. The government can do whatever it wants, we no longer have the weather under ground to protect us, and the government constantly shows us that they are in complete control and our weak and cowardly citizens are not standing up to it's oppressions. However, the government is SUPPOSED to remain impartial when it comes to religious matters. There are MANY different religions out there, and basically two views the American citizens have; right, and wrong. The government infuriates many people with it's latest actions in the last decade, and the matter of making love illegal is one of the worst mistakes it could make. That being said; You continually bring up the Roman empire as ammo, and by the way, I intend to make the shortest possible responses this time, as you clearly are afraid of elaborating your opinions to sway mine in this matter. Your half-hearted answers to mine are almost an insult and if not for my curiosity to how this will all end, I'd just walk away right now knowing how I feel. I'm sure the Romans did all SORT of stupid things. They were Catholic, and the Catholics are not of the religions, not to say ANY religion is very bright. They crucified thousands, spent most of it's wealth on trying to conquer Persia, for what? To be bullies? And just like our government, killed or completely discredited anyone who spoke out against their rulers. Thee is a reason Polygamy isn't very popular in this country, it's insane! There's what, ONE state it's allowed in, and even there, it's frowned upon. But the Romans allowed it. We don't really crucify people anymore, but the Romans did it all the time. So to say that homosexuality was accepted by those crazy Romans, well, it's not something I would personally lead within a debate. "I feel no need to address the first two-thirds, as it bears no relevance to same-sex marriage." Everything I have said in this debate, despite my opening, has been a direct answer to things YOU have written, so to completely dismiss "the first two-thirds" basically says you want to give up. That the rest of this doesn't matter, than you have put our fingers in your ears, and are now going "la, la, la, la, la, la" with your eyes closed. "You also left out the part where I noted that plenty of people don't wish to create another life. " No, I didn't. What I SAID was: "...I said WISH to create another life. If one or the other wasn't interested in creating a child, then how would they have found out they can't without first wanting to, and trying? And you're absolutely right, I should have said a relationship is GENERALLY to create a bond strong enough to create a child, thank you for arguing the semantics of my wording." You're right, not all people want to be in a relationship and have a child, but the majority of them do. " In modern times, there is an economic stability aspect to marriage. Marrying a child or an animal would not contribute to financial stability at all." What are you talking about? Are you falling asleep or becoming drunk as you write this? What was happening there? I mean, the first part doesn't make much sense, what doe economically stable have at all to do with being married? And the second part? I mean, what were you thinking about? Did you actually read it as someone else objectively after you wrote it? You know, honestly, I don't feel you're very much into this debate. I have said my piece. I am curious as to what the people will think about my arguments versus yours. I feel that my arguments are much stronger than yours and my logic and reasoning are much better than yours "dr.". That is all I have to say, I feel I won.