Death Penalty

1. I searched beheaded man online and found some ISIS stuff and a kid who got beheaded. ISIS kills people for not being muslim enough. The kid who got beheaded in the 1st image didn't get beheaded as a punishment for a crime. It was for a for profit ritual. While I aggree that nonconsensual human sacrifice is wrong, that's not what is being disputed. Should the person who killed that child be killed because of what he did to the child? I have said yes, you have said no.As for the "church forgave a killer" claim that you mentioned, this is a reference to people at a South Carolina church forgiving Dylan roof for commiting a mass shooting. However, remember when you said, (In Christianity who should we listen to? Christians or God?). In that context, you were thinking that the Christains tended to support the death penelty whereas God was against it. I then showed in the previous round how God the father and Jesus support a legal death penelty. But ironically, in the example you showed me, it was actually the Christains who are against the death penelty. However, despite this, the bible supports an eye for an eye and it shows that Jesus did not come to abolish any former law. Previously, you asked me who I would support more, Pro death penelty Christains or an "Anti Death penelty" God. Now I am asking you, would you listen to more, anti death penelty Christains or a pro death penelty god? Because God and the bible support an eye for an eye.2. There is not an issue with claiming that execution for murderers is right. 3. Criminals don't listen to lectures.4. No. The executioner's killing was justified since he killed a murderer, and murderers are less valuable then animals. The murderer murdered at least 1 innocent person, often a child.5. Murderers have mental issues, yes. However, this does not excuse them for murdering. If there is someone with a drinking problem, and he drunk drives and kills someone, is that blamed on his drinking addiction? No. The accident happened from his choices. If he has a drinking problem, he simply calls an Uber. Similiary, if a murderer wants to commit murder, they can call a theropist before the murder happens. This can actually prevent the murder. If a would be criminal gets fixed before a murder happens, they won't have to get punished(other then paying money for theropists, but that is nomonial). However, the punishment for murdering someone should be death.6. "I still disagree with it" Do you disaggree with the US military, the death penelty or both?7. I do think the death penelty is based off of the Eye for an eye belief.8. Execution is not bad. Murder is. It's not about reducing the death rate. It's partly about reducing the homicide rate. Japan has the death penelty and South Africa does not. Japan has a much lower homicide rate. This is partly true due to the fact that Japan has the death penelty and South Africa does not.9. I simpathize with the victim. The victim can get restitution. This can be paid for by a public execution of a murderer that people pay money to see. Lethal injection is too nice for murderers.10. "I despise that religion who don't love their enemies.". I think that saying this would be inconsistent with what you said in the previous comment and maybe with your morals in general. (As a metaphor) if a conservative Christain was against illegal immigration and was presented biblical evidence that God has lienent immigration standards, it would be one thing if they interpreted the verse differently and had a conservative interpretation, it would be another thing if they denied Christiainity because of the verse and claimed to be a Christian in every other application.11. Now that you understand the difference, why is execution for those that deserve it bad?12. If a fetus is in the wrong place, can they be moved so they are in the right place? I am not a doctor, I don't know if this will keep the fetus alive. I hope it does, but I don't know.13. No. You are stating the same arguments which I rebuttle with the same basic message.