Evidence exists that is more logical for creationist than evolutionist conclusions

Thus I present the following:1. Human Population Growth Rates:A core scientific precept used in radiometric dating is that "the present is the key to the past" or in other words, the rates observed today (including radiometric decay rates) can be assumed constant in the distant past. [1] However, the rates of population growth that we see today are far too rapid for humans to have existed millions of years ago. Annual population growth rates today exceed 1% in the majority of the world's countries, and 51 of the world's 233 countries even have rates above 2%. [2]At a 1% growth rate (which most countries in the world have) one goes from 8 people (the survivors of Noah's Ark - Genesis 7:13) to 7 billion in just 2,071 years. Human population growth rates seen today are a strong evidence that the Bible is correct that human civilization is young. Even at rates just 1/5 those seen today, 0.2%, human population would still be younger than 7,000 years. [3] 2. Dinosaur Soft Tissue:Contrary to predictions based on the theory of Evolution, numerous cases of soft tissue have been discovered. Whereas it had been assumed soft tissue could not exist beyond 100,000 years,[4] numerous finds of dinosaur soft tissue, including preserved blood vessels, are being discovered that supposedly date as far back as 65 million years: 1982: Mummified insect discovered with soft tissue. [5] 1992: Mary Schweitzer discovers red blood cells in a T-Rex fossil believed to be 67 million years old. [6] 1998: Thousands of dinosaur eggs discovered with evidence of fossilized skin still intact. [7] 2005: Blood vessels and cells discovered in alleged 70 million year-old T-Rex. [8] Soft tissue was also discovered in 3 other dinosaurs, a Hadrosaur and two T-Rexes. [9] 2007: Similar soft tissue found from mastodons was genetically examined showing similarity to modern elephants. [10] 2009: Preserved blood vessels found in a Hadrosaur. [11] 2012: Molecular analysis confirms the soft tissue is genuine. [12] 2013: Duck-billed Edmontosaurus discovered with fleshy head crest intact. [13] A cache of 20 Lufengosaurus dinosaur eggs that had been flooded out of their nests get discovered[14]; the eggs contain "organic material. "[15] 2014: Ancient crustaceans including embryos containing soft tissue discovered dating to an alleged 500 million years. [16] Soft tissue was not supposed to be able to exist beyond 100,000 years, that it is being repeatedly discovered to have existed into the very depths of the fossil record is a strong evidence that life is younger, consistent with Creationism.3. Living Fossils and Lazarus TaxaFrom an Evolutionist standpoint it is difficult to explain how creatures can disappear from the fossil record for tens of millions of years, and then be discovered alive today after they'd been presumed long extinct. This is more believable from a Creationist paradigm. Examples include: Coelacanth: Presumed extinct for 65 million years, it was discovered alive in 1938. The coelacanths seen today are essentially the same as their counterparts in the fossil record (which are claimed to be 375 million years old). [17] Laotian Rock Rat: Discovered in 2005 in Laos, it was initially named the Rat-Squirrel. However, upon discovering it was actually a creature known only from the fossil record that had been thought extinct 11 million years, it was renamed. [18] Glass Sponge Reefs: Thought extinct for 100 million years, they were rediscovered in 2007. [19] Pygmy Whales: Thought extinct for 2 million years, a 2012 study discovered otherwise. [20] 4. Microevolutionary Rates:Again, if the "present is the key to the past" then we should see species adapting consistent with rates that would make them millions of years old. This is not what we see. Rather, microevolution is far more rapid, consistent with adaptation over "decades and tens of meters. "[21] Not only does this indicate a much younger date to life, but it raises the question of why, if macroevolution is a reality, can we not witness it occurring today as we can microevolution? Australian Cane Toad: The so-called Toxic Toad defied predictions in 2006-07, adapting longer legs and heat tolerance within decades, overrunning the continent and causing a government crisis. [22] Italian Wall Lizards: After 5 pairs of lizards were introduced in Croatia, they had overrun the island by evolving a new stomach structure, cecal valves, and a harder bite; all within a few decades. [23] Rodents: A 2009 study discovered rodents are evolving at "unprecedented rates" that are "extremely rapid and interrelated in ways not predicted by current evolutionary theories. "[24] Plants: A 2012 study discovered "The evolution of mutation rate, genome size, and chromosome structure can therefore be extremely rapid and interrelated in ways not predicted by current evolutionary theories. "[25] 5. Oldest Hominids BipedalA series of hominid revelations over the past 20 years show the earliest humans weren't similar to modern apes but walked upright and were similar to modern man. 2009, Ardi: The discovery of Ardipithecus conclusively showed bipedalism and disproved any similarity to modern apes. [26] 2000, Orrorin: Walked upright and in "advanced stage of evolution. " 2002, Tcadensis: Upright and modern face. SOURCES:[1] . http://www.amnh.org... [2] . https://www.cia.gov... [3] . http://creation.com...;[4] . http://discovermagazine.com...;[5] . http://www.nytimes.com...;[6] . http://www.nature.com...;[7] . http://www.sciencedaily.com...; [8] . http://www.nbcnews.com...;[9] . http://www.sciencedaily.com...;[10] . http://www.npr.org...;[11] . http://news.nationalgeographic.com...;[12] . http://www.nature.com...;[13] . http://news.nationalgeographic.com...;[14] . http://www.usatoday.com...;[15] . http://news.sciencemag.org...;[16] . http://www.nbcnews.com...;http://scitechdaily.com...;[17] . http://images.library.amnh.org...;[18] . http://usatoday30.usatoday.com...;[19] . http://www.nbcnews.com...;[20] . http://www.foxnews.com...;[21] . http://environment.yale.edu...;[22] . http://news.nationalgeographic.com...;http://news.discovery.com...;[23] . http://news.nationalgeographic.com...;[24] . http://www.plosone.org...;[25] . http://www.plosbiology.org...;[26] . http://news.nationalgeographic.com...;