A border fence is needed along America and Mexico.

Because I only have 10 minutes left to write a reply for this round, I will c/p my opponent's arguments in bold, and respond underneath in regular text. The wall satisfies all. This is a bare assertion. Pro hasn't proven that "the wall satisfies all" and in fact I have argued why it is problematic.Countries in Central America want a strong powerful government, compared to cartel anarchy. We as Americans would want to support a very Democratic-Humantarian cause. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend. Regardless, if Pro's point is that drug cartels are runing Central and South American governments, then extend my arguments about how legalizing drugs can and does cripple the power of drug cartels. Further this point is irrelevant to the productivity of constructing a Mexican-American border fence. We like puppet government and no horrible drugs Crack, Cocaine, Heroin, DMT, Salvia, and all forms of meth. The public and the officials in our Government want these things.Irrelevant? The wall is "Oh! Thank God we had that!" type of project. Imagine in the future lets say 200-300 years. All of South America untie to fight America. By then we would add on to the wall since, but this is the cornerstone...I'm not sure if this is proper English. I can't make sense of what this is supposed to say or how it is an argument in favor of the border fance. We have governments, backed by the UN. Cartel controlled areas don't count.A common cause.Defense.This is just a bunch of random words. I've already addressed the "defense" argument. Pro has ignored my rebuttal despite the fact that I highlighted all of his dropped arguments for him specifically by bullet point. How would a border fence specifically protect the U.S.? How would it combat nuclear warfare, biochemical warfare, economic warfare, etc.?The Chinese never really stopped the Mongols. Maybe some walls only went 500 feet. But we learn from history, we surpass it. The wall is built from the edge of California to the Texas Tip. The river we can give the majority of Mexico because well Rio Grande! Unless tunnels are used, which hardly any work/end up collapsing. We have TV shows about it. It is gross propaganda and fear, tactics of conservatives... I never specified the distances and measurements exactly. Adding 15 new borders, for more looser traffic and more security officers. Also remember the Towers.None of this remotely makes any sense or addresses my rebuttal about how the wall would fail to protect against most forms of modern warfare against make-believe enemies (none of whom are attacking or as we know plan to attack the U.S.). We have 1989 thousand miles of borders. we will add roughly 14 new crossings.Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and thee American governments are happy. Happiness equals peace. Source: COMMON SENSE"Common sense" is not a source. Pro hasn't explained how we will fund all of these borders (or responded to my arguments about cost and inefficiency as well as U.S. borders that are nowhere near Mexico. Greatest Defense System ever. I suppose a scenario:BRICS nations are about to launch a global bank. The Bank will make up of Chinese currency. Not the US dollar.Look this is crazy to think. Not just arming America most the planet. No time in history of humans, have two major banks both globally and not at the same time. This will cause chaos. The stock market will crash massively. Chaos will erupt. America and NATO nations might attack BRICS = Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.Notice the first? Brazil they have many allies like Argentina, Columbia, Cuba, Venezuela. And even huge sway on Mexico. A war breaks out and if WW3 did go down. The world may establish a no nuke war because of immortality and innocents. A mass ground offensive from South America gets stopped by the wall.None of this remotely addresses any of my dropped arguments. None of this explains why the U.S. needs a wall. None of this explains how the wall would be efficient or worthwhile on a cost-benefit analysis. None of this explains why it is a moral endeavor to construct the wall. Please extend my 21 dropped arguments. Pro has not responded to them despite the fact that I singled them out by bullet-point for an easy reference as to all of my points that he ignored or did not refute.