Yesterday was a KEY turing point in Election 08 : Barack Hussein Obama will likely be the president

As I like to keep my final arguments short, i will try to stay brief, but i will not make any gurantees. I have found one major flaw. You copied a review from amazon.com and used it as your own writing, not mentioning it as a source or anyhting like that. This is what the review says, also known as what you wrote: "As Don Corleone would have said, "I'm a superstitious man, and if some unlucky accident should befall someone who could harm Clinton - if he is to be shot in the head by a police officer, or be found hung dead in a jail cell... or if he should be struck by a bolt of lightning - then I'm going to blame some of the people in his administration." If all those deaths associated with people who had the power to bring Clinton down were simply coincidence, Clinton's the luckiest president in history. Not only was Brown's head wound perfectly round and perfectly sized for a .45-caliber bullet hole, it was beveled just like an object with blunt sides, kinda like...well...a bullet. Then investigators want to talk to the local who was responsible for bringing in the plane for landing, but ooopsie, he's got a bullet hole in him, too. And guess what? It's a .45-caliber bullet wound said to be self-inflicted. I can't help but think how lucky Mr. Clinton was. And how conveeeenient it was for the local to use a U.S. caliber instead of a 9mm or .380. But I have to admit this hit was cleaner than the Vince Foster hit. Now the guy who did Vince was a rank amateur. They should let the mob go back to doing these things. They were much better. For those who believe this was all coincidence, there are a lot of good books on the Easter Bunny here." Now as the places of location are completely different, I highly doubt that this is your amazon.com account. Just for readers sake, I would like to give the only response to that plagarized review: "I think it was the Easter Bunny who either a) shot Brown in the head before the flight and bundled him into a seat like "Weekend at Bernie's", b) hopped onto the plane during the flight, shot Brown in full view of thirty four other passengers and hopped out, or c) hired a couple of Croatian commandos to appear at the crash site and pump bullets into the dead man's head. Of course, no bullet, no metal fragments, and no exit wound may have something to do with the fact that no investigation has ever concluded that Brown was, in fact, shot. I would sooner believe in the Easter Bunny than to believe this conspiracist trash. Oswald acted alone. There are no UFOs. Vince Foster killed himself. Ron Brown and 34 others died in a plane crash. Jack Cashill gets it wrong again." Only an opinion, but strong nonetheless. Now to refute your final argumentI consolidated due to your unnecesary spacing): "But this debate is about how Barack will win the presidency he will defeat Clinton and probably also McCain McCain will be tough for him to beat on ISSUES, or REALITY he will NOT be able to keep speaking in generalities in the general But he is VERY SMART and will likely be able to AVOID tough questions He also appears to be willing to take some conservative positions 1. you cant make generalizations about Obama def. defeating Clinton and McCain, as the last time I checked Clinton was ahead in the delegate count. 2. "McCain will be tough for him to beat on ISSUES, or REALITY." Ok, you just told us that McCain is better than Obama in "REALITY" and the "ISSUES." 3. You did it again with the "he will not be able to speak in generalities in the general." 4. I know that he is smart, as anyone who takes up this race is smart (except maybe Romney). 5. I know nothing about the positions he might or might not take, so I concede that ONE point to you. Please vote con. Thank you.