Should abortion be legal

I don"t think that anyone can honestly say that sex does not lead to potential procreation. However, there are ways to prevent that. Sex is a natural impulse and a necessity to a happy and healthy life. The fact of ending a life for the comfort of another is not what I am saying I am saying that we have no right to force something on to someone who does not want it. Are you saying that we should be allowed to use other people"s bodies if it means saving another life? A pregnancy is not nothing it can have lifelong consequences and damage done to the body. And no women should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term if she does not want it. People have the right to have sex and sex does not always lead to a child and with modern technology of birth control and other forms of contraceptives it is not something that even has to be a part of the equation. It is natural to eat but even through eating you run the risk of getting a parasite and ultimately that is what a baby is. A foreign creature eating up nutrients and doing damage to the body. If a woman wishes to remove it she has the right to do so. Again abortion is merely moving a creature from one place to another. The fact that that creature cannot support its own life function is an unfortunate by product. What I am talking about with weather a person wants to live or not is that, do we even have the right to bring life into this world at all? Now of course people will for their own happiness with little thought of the child but that"s another debate. You don"t seem to be addressing my main issue that a women"s body should not be used as a life support system against her will any more then we should rip out a person"s liver to give it to someone who needs it to stay alive. Weather that person engaged in a natural action of sex is irrelevant. Your moon analogy it just a play to make a point you want viewed. It is irresponsible to expect someone to breath under water or in a none oxygen environment no one can do that without assistance. But to except a creature to breath oxygen or and digest food is not. There is a difference between us and the unborn with or without assistance I can live unlike a new born who can"t. after that baby is removed you want to hook them up to a life support system and help them live fine but they don"t get to hold a person"s body hostage to do it. I have never said that a baby is not alive or a person I have only said that they do not have special rights to use other people"s bodies to stay alive. "basically our arguments go as such: you say the unborn don't have a right to their own mother"s bodies. I say that the unborn are humans (based on science) and you can't kill humans because they are a burden to you. It is absurd to think that carrying a child is some act of goodwill towards this thing inside a mother, and that abortion is just denying some charity." They are not killing them to kill them they are not allowing them to residence in their body when they don"t want them there. Which a woman has a right to do. It"s not a matter of a burden or not you have no right no matter your size or need to use my body for anything unless I give permission. If a baby does not have permission to be inside a women"s body she has the right to remove it.