Chess is a sport

Once again that's not how BOP works, if it comes down to it and no points stand i still win because you haven't fulfilled your BOP, my argument have been explained and your responded to them last round without issues, this is simply a poor last ditch effort to get points. She herself has broken her own rules by bringing up new Cards when she clearly calls for this round to be used as a rebuttal only.I showed evidence and provided logic behind why physical exertion is physical movement and why thinking is mental exertion.my opponent contradicts herself in her introduction while criticizing how I debate by stating "let's use some logic." (as if I weren't using any logic or needed a capitalized reminder) " then commencing to saying "Having a strong opinion doesn't mean we can't talk freely on an equal level; there is no need to rhetorically attack one's statements, if we can attack them logically." she essentially criticizes me and the says what she criticized me for. I find this conduct unruly and should provide you with reason to move conduct points in my favor.And lastly my opponent didn't refute my definition until now and through omission of the evidence it still stands.Response to Mental and Physical exertion are absolutely to separate;At no point did i claim thoughts were magic i simply stated its not physical exertion, but instead mental. my opponent doesn't refute this and instead stated what we use our brain for. All of which require mental, and not physical, exertion.Response to Exertion is not Exhaustion ;Once again because you get tired does not mean you are participating in a sport, and in fact doing nothing does exhaust you, THIS IS WHERE MY OPPONENT IS CONFUSED, she thinks exhaustion causes a sport, STANDING CAUSES EXAUSTION, thus her logic states STANDING IS THUS A SPORT. which we all know is absurd, standing is not a sport and neither is chess because at no point in this argument does my opponent show how chess requires physical exertion.Response to Standing would be sport according to my logic;to clairify on stress my opponent in round two states chess "can also trigger stress reactions" im stating just because there are stress reactions doesn't mean there is a sport going on. But real quick im going to address my opponents flawed requirements for a sport; Chess isn't a competition as I have shown and qualifies as a game, however it doesn't meet the requirements to be called a sport (Physical Exertion).STANDING:- it's an activity - it requires skill (Balance)- teams and individuals may under some odd circumstances compete against each other (i used to work at a bowling alley, I was in these odd circumstances once...)- it requires physical exertion-when children first stand parents are entertainedThus its a sport, but we all know standing isn't a sport, so whats missing here? Standing doesn't require physical exertion, people aren't moving, but it still causes exhaustion.CONCLUSION-my opponent has yet to show any physical exertion that is shown in chess, she didn't argue with the observation of mental exertion rather than physical.-she hasn't fulfilled her BOP proving the resolution was true.-she brought up new arguments in the last roundI have addressed every issue my opponent has brought up and she refutes them by simply restating what she said in the first place.Because my opponent has not fulfilled the BOP we can only see a ballot in favor of the NEG