Macro evolution 6

< > No problemo, amigo! I will take each down different avenues, so don't worry about duplicate arguments on my side. Dismissing the accuracy of carbon dating, for the sake of argument, when do you suppose that the comet hit the Earth that brought about the extinction of the dinosaurs? Also, if many dinosaur fossils have been found under TONS of dirt, how do you explain the placement of such large amounts of dirt on the fossils in such a brief time period? Rock sediments also indicate the age of the Earth. How do you explain the fact that some rocks, boulders and mountains have layers of sediments that tell a tale far older than 10,000 years? <<1. The gravitational fields of the sun and stars pull cosmic dust toward them known as the pointing-Robertson effect. Our sun sucks in 100,000 tons a day if our son was more than a couple million years old all the dust would be gone better there is still some in our system and estimation sets it that 10,000 years of dust has been sucked out .>> You have no way of knowing how much cosmic dust there was to begin with, so an accurate prediction of this nature cannot logically be made. You've made no reference to the gravitational fields of the planets or moons in this system. If this is so, then why hasn't the Sun already drawn the planets in as well? <<2. ok second you say well no duhh it would take light billions of years from the farthest star to get here. (well this part not scientific but religious if god created it couldn't he have light were he wanted it if he created the universe) ok also it has been scientifically proven that light is slowing down and 6,000 years ago the light from all the stars would have arrived in three days in time for animals to start seeing it.>> I am an atheist. Your god does not exist, therefore your religious claim is invalid. As for scientific proof that light is slowing down -- I believe this is a lie. What source told you this lie? The speed of light is a constant in the Universe that cannot be change; it has been what it is and will continue to be the very same. <<3. ok now the hottest stars burn well really hot and if we were to go back more than 100,000 years they would fill the entire universe currently and from what I have read monkeys were evolving into humans must be monkeys wearing real good sun screen>> The heat from other stars would not effect the Earth in such a way. It is impossible. <<4. ok here is my two favorites the moon we all believe in the moon I hope. Ok well the moon has been slowly moving away 2 inches a year ok so 4.5 billion years ago the moon would have been 142,045 miles closer to earth hmm let me check that would mean that the earths gravitational field would suck the moon down and ka boom no more life on earth.>> If you believe that the previously extreme heat from neighboring stars could affect the Earth ages ago, then why can't the gravitational field of a planet fluctuate over time as well? Perhaps the gravity of our moon changed. Perhaps a massive asteroid knocked the moon into a different orbit at some point in its relationship with the Earth. <<5. next the Eagle(the piece of the Apollo space craft that landed on the moon) was designed to land in 6 ft of moon dust which would roughly line up with some millions and billions of years but no there was ï¿½ of an inch (easly visible go look at any one of the pictures of the moon foor print) well guess what that is the 6-10 thousand year period.>> The Eagle's landing thrusters cleared that away as it landed. You do realize that even if gravity on the moon is 1/6 of Earth's that the craft would have to slow its descent before actually setting down, right? I could not just drop down safely from orbit. Also, there is no air on the moon. No wind. So dust on the moon does not get transferred around in the same manner as it does here on Earth. < > Thank you. This is turning out to be pretty entertaining!