You Cannot Objectively Know Which Religion Is True (if any)

Criticisms To Your Arguments:1. "Who says that God cannot be physically detectible? Even if he/she/it is transcendent, an omnipotent being is still capable of taking on a physical form."If God had taken a physical form to present Himself to us and reveal the true religion, then everyone would know, as it then would be a scientific and empirical fact that this particular God exists and therefore which religion is true. However, this has never happened, as no God of any religion has been physically detected, which would empirically prove a particular religion is true.2. "If God exists, nothing is impossible."Let's put your statement to the test. Can an omnipotent God create an object to heavy for Himself to lift? If you say yes, then God can create it, but the object would be too heavy, which means there is something that is impossible for God. If you say no, then there is still something that is not possible for God. Hence saying that for God "nothing is impossible" becomes invalid. You may want to be more specific of how you define His ability to do anything.3. "Also, I would add that not all gods are transcendent (the Greek gods are physical, for instance). True, the Judeo-Christian God is transcendent, but those are far from the only religions."Even if some Gods are physical, they still can't be proved scientifically/empirically in an objective way which would prove a particular religion is true. Hence it matters little if you believe they are physical if they can't be objectively proved to exist.4. "And while it is true (as far as we know) that God has never come into the universe/world, it is still possible that it could happen."I agree it is possible. However it is also possible that the unicorn or the tooth fairy could come into our world. Until God comes into our world to prove a particular religion is right, it is not possible to objectively know which religion is true (if any).5. Even if time travel becomes possible in the future (which I doubt as the past doesn't exist), it would still not be possible to detect God, as even if He took a physical form and created the Big Bang "pre-creation", before time and space began to exist, we cannot exceed this point even with time travel (as time stops at start of creation). Hence we couldn't know about God. Nevertheless, this time travel assumption does you little good to prove the motion false now today.My Arguments:1. I have shown in round 2 how people only subjectively know that their religion is true (mostly through indoctrination), which is why everyone of different religions believe their religion is right. This also indicates the lack of ability to objectively know which religion is true without being indoctrinated.2. If the motion is false, then anyone from any religion should be able to objectively reach the conclusion that one particular religion is true. But there isn't a scientific and empirical way to be able to objectively know this, as it's subjective. Many arguments such as 'this holy scripture has evidence for the religion being true', can be applied to many different religions. So there is no objective method. If there were, then everyone who accepts the objective evidence would follow one particular religion and we would not have many different religions in the world.You haven't presented any objective way of knowing that a religion is true which can be applied today so that everyone can know which religion is true (if any). It would also be helpful to specify which religion can be objectively known to be true. So far your general arguments about God can be applied to multiple religions, but you aren't proving how we can objectively know which specific religion is true (if any). This is what is required of you to refute the motion.