BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

By the time the Jets make it to the Super Bowl Mark Sanchez will be traded by Peyton Manning. It is rumored that Payton Manning should be the new quarterback in 2012 therefore replacing Mark Sanchez. Sanchez may have thrown 26 touchdowns but he also threw 18 interceptions that greatly affected the team this season in the playoffs. Manning has better chance at bringing the Jets through the playoffs and into the Super bowl. If Sanchez was to bring the Jets to the Superbowl this was his year to do so. After this year, I don't think he will be a Jets quarterback any longer. http://www.ibtimes.com... nice arguing with you(:
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

Mark Sanchez as the Jets quarterback already came close to the Super Bowl twice in his three year career. He has been close with his team already. He might get weaker as he gets older but he will still be a strong man. He is a professional athlete he has to be strong still. The Jets as a team will win a Super Bowl with Mark Sanchez as their quarterback. The team is great and he is a great player. It will happen sometime during Mark Sanchez's time as a New York Jets player.
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

I am still not convinced. As quarterbacks get older and wiser they also become physically weaker, it's just nature. Even with good coaching skills like Rex Ryans I believe the team can advance as a team. The Super Bowl is still a long shot for the Jets. As I stated before, Mark Sanchez cannot make it to the Super Bowl alone. By the time the Jets even get close to the Super Bowl theres one of three things that can change that will get them to the Super Bowl. 1) Mark Sanchez retired 2) A better quarter back traded in aka Peyton Manning 3) Mark Sanchez traded to a different team
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

Of course football is a team game and everybody will have to be playing well for the Jets to get to the Super Bowl. Over the past three easons they have proved that they have the talent to win and get to the Super Bowl. They just need their leaders to step up and make plays. Mark Sanchez has to lead them to the Super Bowl. He will continue to get better and make his team better by him being better. Quarterback is a very important postion but the players around him do have to help him out. The Tomlinson touchdown finshed off a Jets drive where Sanchez, as the quarterback, had to lead them to the endzone. The Tomlinson play was the finish. With Rex Ryan as a Head Coach the New York Jets will always have a great defense. That part of the team is taken care of. With Mike Westoff as the Special Teams Coach the New York Jets have always been great on special teams. Now Sanchez, along with new Offenseive Coordinator Tony Sprano, will have to lead the Jets to where they belong. The Super Bowl.
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

No he won't. All your stats are very impressive, however Mark Sanchez still does not have the experience to lead his team to the Super Bowl. He is also not the one bringing them to the Super Bowl, its not a free bus ride. Last time I checked, Mark Sanchez is not the only one playing, its effort of 54 people that are on that team.To reach the Super Bowl, Not only does he have to keep excelling but the offense and defense have to keep working on their plays. Its a team effort for to make it to the Super Bowl not just Mark Sanchez. Also you brought up that Mark Sanchez beat Peyton Manning during his second season. Correction the Jets as a team beat the Colts. LaDainian Tomlinson scored a 1-yard touchdown running back during the second half that put them on the lead. Team work like this is what can get the Jets to the Superbowl. Jets also have to be a lot more aggressive when it comes to playing bigger and better teams like the Giants or Patriots who are in the Superbowl this season.
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

Mark Sanchez has come through under pressure in his short three year career. He has six, maybe eight depending on time, fourth quarter drives to win the game. He does make mistakes but all quarterbacks do. In his first season he had to lead his team to wins in his last two games of the season just to make the playoffs. In his first season he led his team to the AFC Championship. In his second season he also led the Jets to the AFC Championship. In that years playoffs Sanchez beat Peyton Manning in the first round playoffs. The jets won by one point and Sanchez led them to a fourth quarter come back win over Peyton Manning. When the pressure is on in games Mark Sanchez does come through for his team. Sanchez will always have a great defense all he has to do is lead his team to the Super Bowl. Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl as a New York Jets quarterback.
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

Which ever manning goes to the jets, it doesn't matter, those two are the only ones that can bring the jets to the Super Bowl. it's true people get better with age, however i feel Sanchez cracks under pressure. He has had many opportunities to make good plays this season and made huge mistakes that high school students would make. these mistakes cost him the game. at the end it doesn't matter what his career is but who won the Super Bowl.
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

The Manning that would go to the Jets would be Peyton Manning from the Colts not Eli of the Giants. Mark Sanchez has already been to two AFC Championship games in his three year career. He is 4 and 2 as a starter in the playoffs, all on the road. he has been a starter in the NFL for three years now and quarterbacks only get better with age. Drew Brees was not as good as he is now when he was in his third year in the NFL. Same with both of the Manning brothers. They took time to understand what it takes to win. In Eli's third season he threw for two less Touchdowns and two hundred yards less than Sanchez did in his third season and Eli did not play in that many playoff games as Sanchez did. It takes time for a quarterback to grow. Mark Sanchez will only get better in with age and playing more games under center. He is a good quarterback at a young age. He missed the playoffs for the first time in his career this year but he still threw for the most passing touchdowns in his career this year with twenty-six. He also ran for six touchdowns. that is a career high for him also. He had his best completion percentage with 56.7%. He threw for a career high in yards also with 3,474. In a year without playoffs Sanchez still proved he could improve his stats and get better at his position. By the end of Sanchez's career he will have a Super Bowl ring.
Mark Sanchez will win a Super Bowl with the New York Jets

I don't think Mark Sanchez will ever bring the New YORK Jets to the Superbowl. He has not played well at all this season. He cracks under pressure as a quarterback and ends up passing it straight to he other team. Unless he works his passing skills and is quicker on his feet, he will never be a strong player. I believe the best player right now is Eli Manning on the the Giants team. There was discussion on ESPN that Manning could possibly play for the Jets next season. He will do a much better job at leading the New York Jets to victory at a Superbowl.
Rap Battle

If my raps skills were a basketball player call me King James after this you gonna be worshiping me my parents are from Beijing Goin see me for the Super Bowl 52 halftime im the all times greatest Broski this is wartime pull up to ya house with the drako shootin everybody until somebody die just like 21 Borskie you broke asf I hope you fu(king croak marijuana is the only thing i smoke FREEBANZ BIT(H!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rap Battle

This "fake Eminem" IS getting his second verse And I gotta say that YOUR second one was worse So bad I gotta curse, so laughable Ima bout to burst No rhymes for you again, you got none in your purse? Battling you is adverse, so just go away in a hearse Cause to make the world better, you gotta leave first I did my homework, and for more I do not thirst But I could go for apple juice... or blood, yours works
Rap Battle

OK, like Lil Yachty, "we gon' turn this shjt to Columbine" Like with my Tec 9, I wreck thy fvckin' all the time But luckily the police haven't even called a crime Asking me to rap battle a second time, you crossed the line All of my raps actually rhyme, and aint that the point? None of your shjt rhymes, what are you, smoking a joint? Ajisthetruth has trouble spitting up bars that he coined No dimes for him, for you no time to win, now this I exploit Back to back loser? I know I've never failed Look at my win ratio, at it you can forever hail Cvnt!
Rap Battle

rofl this thing said cook me like bacon lookin at me like imma shinnin star bruh needs to get deported cuz i'm the next trump takin back to back loses call you Meek Mill Bars stronger than fu(king Drizzy makin your friends fingers turnin in to twitter fingers give me one night just like yachty you're girl be mine miss stealyourgirl in da building imma outta time to roast ya a$$ FREEBANDZ bit(h
Physical reality is an illusion

My opponents resolution: Physical reality is false or not realI apologise deeply for not explaining my resolutions properly in round 1. In the previous rounds I take my definitions from a different source from con as you can see in my source links in the previous rounds. Here are some definitions provided by this source (1)il·lu·sion 1. a. An erroneous perception of reality. b. An erroneous concept or belief. 2. The condition of being deceived by a false perception or belief.illusion 1. a false appearance or deceptive impression of reality: the mirror gives an illusion of depth. These are the definitions of the word 'illusion' that I grew up with. And it fits my resolution that people have a false concept of reality and that the world they experience isn't the world it actually is such as perceiving colour or feeling solidity in objects, or even that the things they touch are almost completely empty space.However this is not my only contention for physical reality being an illusion, I have mentioned other arguments such as the possibility that our electrical signals can be tampered with and manipulated and the theory about reality being a dream and that there is a higher consciousness dreaming up our reality. In the previous round, con has not replied or commented on any of these ideas so I can only assume Con accepts the probabitlity of these ideas.I apologise again for not stating my resolution properly. I await Con's response. Source(1) http://www.thefreedictionary.com...
Physical reality is an illusion

ILLUSION: something that is false or not real but that seems to be true or real-http://www.merriam-webster.com...My opponents resolution: Physical reality is false or not real"I understand that Con might have assumed my debate (physical reality is an illusion) that I mean it is unreal or non-existing.But what I mean is that most people have a false sense of empirically solid universe with everything rigid when in fact its not and that their universe is created by a tiny amount of something, (not even a speck really) in a brimming ocean of nothingness to which we call it the universe."My opponent is debating something different than the actual resolution. Therefore my opponent has been tearing down an unintentional straw man.
Physical reality is an illusion

All these things prove to you that the table is physical, solid and real. But in fact, the table is actually made up of nothingness. 99% of an atom is empty space (1). The distance between the nucleus and the electrons is enormous. “If an atom were the size of a football field, the nucleus would be a small marble at the 50 – yard line” – (2). The table is made up of 99% empty space, yet we say it is solid and real.1. The table isn't made of nothingness because of that 1% of something in the atom. 2. If you mean solid as in you can't stick your hand through it then yes it is solid. I's also solid in every other definition of the word.3. Of course it is real.In the entire Universe, there is less than 2% observable matter. This 2% contains matter in stars, neutrinos which are hardly solid and 0.03% of heavy elements. Therefore there are even less solid matter like metals in the universe. (3) Then there’s light and radiation and other particles that we can’t see that have no mass.1. Yes and that 2% of matter is solid and physical.2. It doesn't matter how much normal matter is in the universe as long as their is some."The universe is almost made of nothing. Dark energy and dark matter is what encompasses the rest of the universe (more than 80%)How can we call such an empty universe a physical reality, when it’s not at all solid and some of it is massless like light? In fact when we define ‘physical’, what do we really mean? Is it any wrong to say it’s not physical and it is all illusionary?1. Dark Energy and Dark Matter are something.2. We can call such an empty universe a physical reality because there is some matter and energy in it.3. Yes it is wrong to call it illusory because if it were illusory there wouldn't actually be ANYTHING; but there is matter in the universe.
Physical reality is an illusion

And I apologise for the wait. I will get to Con's question after I've explained why I believe physical reality might be an illusion. Physical Reality is almost unprovable as being physical at all We believe that the world around us is physical, right? We believe it’s all 'concrete' and real. We can even prove this can't we? For example: 1) Seeing a table. A wooden table. Because seeing is believing, once you see the table you recognize the table as being 'there' or existing as far as your eyes can tell. 2) You touch the table and now you absolutely know it's physical. You can feel the texture, how smooth it is and how flat. You can press on the table, and it holds still, proving that it's a hard object. All these things prove to you that the table is physical, solid and real. But in fact, the table is actually made up of nothingness. 99% of an atom is empty space (1). The distance between the nucleus and the electrons is enormous. “If an atom were the size of a football field, the nucleus would be a small marble at the 50 – yard line” – (2). The table is made up of 99% empty space, yet we say it is solid and real. In the entire Universe, there is less than 2% observable matter. This 2% contains matter in stars, neutrinos which are hardly solid and 0.03% of heavy elements. Therefore there are even less solid matter like metals in the universe. (3) Then there’s light and radiation and other particles that we can’t see that have no mass. The universe is almost made of nothing. Dark energy and dark matter is what encompasses the rest of the universe (more than 80%)How can we call such an empty universe a physical reality, when it’s not at all solid and some of it is massless like light? In fact when we define ‘physical’, what do we really mean? Is it any wrong to say it’s not physical and it is all illusionary? Sources: (1) Empty space in atoms - . http://wiki.answers.com... , . http://indianapublicmedia.org..., . http://www.chacha.com... (2) Atom scale - . http://66.147.244.131/ ~explain4/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/atom_size. png (3) Universe pie chart- . http://scienceblogs.com... Percentage of matter in the Universe - . http://science.howstuffworks.com... , In reply to Con "I will start with a question: If reality is an illusion create by the brain; where is the brain that is creating the illusion? " A good question. This is what I suggest. Reality is being created by a consciousness that exists in a higher dimensional plane or reality rather than a brain that exist in this 3dimensional reality. I will explain this in my next arguments in the next round or so.
Physical reality is an illusion

As the Pro I will be advocating that physical reality is an illusion. Where I discuss that physical reality could arguably be happening inside a consciousness like a brain creates dreams. The dreams seem real but are actually manufactured and not physical at all. I play with the idea that physical reality is the same thing, being that the universe has so much dark energy and dark matter and less than 2% visible matter. This is more of a logic and reason debate and the question cannot be proven so choosing to cite sources and quotes is optional. Rules : 1) First round is for acceptance 2) Citing sources is optional 3) Last round is only for conclusions and no new arguments. Btw, this is my first ever debate so please forgive any clumsiness :)
Physical reality is an illusion

And now this debate has devolved into semantics.Sorry for not explaining some definitions earlier. It was my mistake.Howver, this was my first ever debate and I really enjoyed it. Con has my gratitude.At any rate, this is the last round for me so I will use it to conclude some things.Summary1.The amount of matter in the universe is tiny.2.An atom is mostly 99% empty space.3.Matter is inherently 'fuzzy' and if we go small enough, it ceases to be solid; of definite shape and volume.4.Thus solidity is an illusion and things can appear solid because matter combines and forms a rigid shape with the use of Nuclear Force.5.You cannot touch anything, the nucleus of an atom cannot touch another nucleus because of electrostatic force. Everytime you touch something, the atoms of your hand hovers a slight distance from the object. People believe what they touch is real, but they are not even touching it. The way we prove we are touching something is by our nerve cells feeling pressure and then sending us the feeling of touching something when fundamentally, we aren't.6. If our perception of the world is based on electrical signals passed from our body such as from the eyes, the ears and from the skin, then these electrical signals can also be tampered, manipulated or even created by perhaps the use of machinary.7. Evrything else I mention is mostly theory. I explain how a higher consciousness could be 'dreaming' up reality. Or that we are living inside a dream. Conclusion1. People have a false concept or perception of physical reality because of the nature of their body and the nature of the Universe. 2. There is a possibility that the world you are experiencing could have been conjured up by a third party or even by yourself as your electrical nerve signals can be tampered with.Thanks to anyone who read this debate. And thank you Con for participating. Have a good day.
Cell Phones Should Be Allowed In School

"Just because this may not happen in your area doesn't mean that is doesn't happen. If they did, this would prove that they are responsible enough to check on their own assignments without begging to someone else. Plus if the person is gone, how would they know what is going on for that next day besides going on the blog?" Why would a person check their homework at school? There is a reason why it is called homework. It doesn't make any sense for a student to check homework at school. If they are gone from school they check their homework from a laptop at home. Also the can call their friend. "Not everyone uses a chrome book and not every phone is $200." The majority of students use iphones and androids. Also most students have a laptop. The situation in which a family can't even afford a laptop is unrealistic. If a person has a job they can buy a laptop, and within a few days assuming they are on minimum wage, the can earn enough to buy one. Also they could go to a library and use computers. "And from round 1- they are not always a distraction. And if some people don't have a phone, they can be shared or submitted in another way." My opponent is stating an unrealistic situation were kids don't play video games on phones and that phones don't ring when they are turned on. Students can use phones to cheat during tests, text during classes, and play video games. During a study there where three sets of students from high schools that were allowed to use their phones. Over 90% of them admitted that they used there phones for texting and gaming at one point or another. Is this what students should be doing during class time, texting and gaming? Unless my opponent can bring counter evidence against this survey, I believe that I have won this debate. Sources: http://www.thedigitalshift.com... http://www.sciencedaily.com... http://www.newswise.com...
Cell Phones Should Be Allowed In School

Just because this may not happen in your area doesn't mean that is doesn't happen. If they did, this would prove that they are responsible enough to check on their own assignments without begging to someone else. Plus if the person is gone, how would they know what is going on for that next day besides going on the blog? Not everyone uses a chrome book and not every phone is $200. And from round 1- they are not always a distraction. And if some people don't have a phone, they can be shared or submitted in another way.
Cell Phones Should Be Allowed In School

"If students actually were smart, they would be responsible enough to see what assignments would we due the next day and or when they would be due so that the work in class and out could be done in an orderly manner." This statement does not relate to the topic. Students do not check for assignments due the next day at school. Also teachers normally tell students when the assignment is due in class so students need to use phones. "Phones help. There are things that are difficult to grade. With the technology that is around these days, there can be a full 360 view of the project. Plus, if there was a class blog, the submissions can be on there for the teacher to grade." Wouldn't a teacher rather use a laptop? A phone's screen is tiny, how are the supposed to see everything? "In some cases, families do not have enough to have a phone and a computer. In modern society, computers are way more expensive than a phone." Most cases families do have enough for a computer though. An iphone cost $200 at the cheapest, and a chrome book costs about $250, a low income family could earn the extra money in 5-7 hours depending on where they live, and gain a far better product. Also why would a family want a phone if they can't even afford a laptop? Also they can always go to a library and use the computers free. My opponent still has not managed to counter any of my points from round one.
Cell Phones Should Be Allowed In School

If students actually were smart, they would be responsible enough to see what assignments would we due the next day and or when they would be due so that the work in class and out could be done in an orderly manner. Phones help. There are things that are difficult to grade. With the technology that is around these days, there can be a full 360 view of the project. Plus, if there was a class blog, the submissions can be on there for the teacher to grade. In some cases, families do not have enough to have a phone and a computer. In modern society, computers are way more expensive than a phone.