BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Wii U is better than an XBOX ONE

lets talk about tech specs. The xbox one has a blue ray disk drive, allowing you to watch blue ray movies, and we both know that the wii u does not have a blue ray port. The xbox one has an hdmi in and out port, allowing you to e cable functionallity so you can use a small portion of the screen to watch the british open and play gta 5 at the same time.e xbox one can have up to 500gb, however the wii u can only withstand 32gb. and even the graphics are much more promising than the wii u. what i am saying is that if you just look at the specs of both xbox one and wii u, the xbox one is hands down better. over to you.
Wii U is better than an XBOX ONE

I will accept your challenge by going with team xbox one. It is hard for me though because i am apart of the playstation nation and i like the ps4 better than the xbox one and the wii u, but i digress. The title of this debate has such a preposterous claim. th the xbox one you have access to all of basically every game that nintendo doesent allow. Such as; Battlefeild 4, far cry 4, gta 5, mortal kombat x, and i cant even say all of the games because the amount of time for my argument. Xbox one won all of E3 this year with their halolense. Yes the wii u controller is kind of dope, but it is not about the controller itself, it is about the user experience. think about all of the pe bethesda games coming to xbox one as well that the wii u will not be obtaining. All nintendo has got going for them is super smash brothers, however the xbox one does not have super smash brothers. only because we got mortal kombat x, and we both agree is more enjoyable. but I admit, wii sports is also kind of fun as well. Also according to IGN, "The xbox one had more sells beating out both ps4 and wii u after e3 2015". when you said "AND ITS BOOOOOOSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!" you only said "its boss" because of its controllers and the child freindly games. you did not state as passionately as i did with the xbox one. You need more facts as in why the wii u is apparently better. over to you.
Dog's are better than Cat's

Sorry about that! As I said, I'm new to this. 1. Cats are nicer to your guests than dogs. When guests come over to my house, I have to lock my dog up because my guests don't like my dog. He's hyper, energetic and loves to play, so he comes out a little mean at times. On the other hand, my cats are usually the ones bombarded by kids, because they are very laid back and love attention. But they stay out of the way when unwanted. Dogs also jump up and lick people, which is not liked by some people. 2. Cats smell better. It's just a fact. Dog odor seems to stay, even after a bath or two. 3. Cats aren't loud. Dogs bark, growl, and it's really loud too. The loudest cat meow was 67.7 decibels loud. [1] The loudest dog bark was 113.1 decibels. [2] That's almost twice as loud! Dogs barking is annoying, especially in town. I don't think anybody's going to have a hard time sleeping because of a cat meowing, but I can see someone having trouble falling asleep because of a dog's bark. Looking forward to the next round. Again, sorry about the rebuttal already. [1] http://www.huffingtonpost.com... [2] http://www.worldrecordacademy.com...
Dog's are better than Cat's

Hello! The debate topic I would like to debate today is "dogs are better than cats." I will be taking the pro side of this debate, or the side supporting dogs. **THIS DEBATE IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ACCEPT** COMMENT IF YOU WANT TO DEBATE, OR PM ME -----RULES------ First round: acceptance only Second Round: up to 3 arguments. NO REBUTTALS. Third Round: up to 3 arguments. NO REBUTTALS. Fourth Round: Rebuttals and conclusion. NO ARGUMENTS! No semantics but you can troll. If you break these rules, you will get votes against you, no matter what. Thanks, DDD
Ps4 Vs. Xbox One

First of all, I can definitely tell you that not everything from Microsoft is perfect and neither are Sony's products. Do you only see that people only complain about their Xbox-es broke down on the internet? Many people say that their PlayStation broke down too as much as the people who say that their Xbox is broken down. Also, have you heard of the "blue lights of death" that PlayStation customers experience? PlayStation breaks down as much (maybe even more) as Xbox breaks down, nothing is perfect, and even if Xbox's red light of death is common, you can actually easily fix it if you pay attention to the community. Second of all, I never said that PlayStation copied 99% of Wii U's idea and their design and just stick their PlayStation sticker on it. I said the key ideas, such as lighting up, sound coming out and touchscreen and other key features are the ideas that PlayStation took and paste it on their trademark controller, did you really think I said that PlayStation copied the whole design of the Wii U's controller? Heck no, just the key features. Third of all, we're talking about Xbox One here, not Xbox 360, how do I know? Because you said you bought a Xbox after buying a PS2, so it has to be a Xbox 360, and you said "I am For Ps4 ALL THE WAY. Who Likes Xbox and Is Willing to debate with me?" So if you're having a debate against a PS4 and a Xbox, it's totally not fair to put Xbox 360 in a competition with a way more advanced PS4, and the red ring problem was a problem with the 360, not Xbox one, so if you're unfair and saying that Xbox 360 is qualified to compete with PS4, you're just plain crazy. And have you not seen the videos that I posted on my previous arguments? You can clearly see that Xbox One's graphics are better, and maybe the 360's graphics aren't better than PS4's graphics because it's more old, and as I said, it seems like your talking about 360's graphics and not Xbox One's graphics against PS4's. And even if PlayStation Move is more cheaper than the Kinect, it's way more advanced and it can see and manipulate your movement way better using its 3D sensor, so it might be more expensive, but it's worth it. Lastly, you can buy a flashdrive that Microsoft sells on their store to get better experience than PlayStation TV, it's a size of a bite sized candy and you can just plug it into any TV and you can sinc with your Xbox and watch other people play games on Xbox live, even project or livestream to another TV screen in case someone wants to watch! In a very respectful manner just because you're an Korean like me, I ask you to "Top that" even if you can't argue anymore.
Ps4 Vs. Xbox One

First of all, I can definitely tell you that it wasn't my fault. So can all the other players that have experienced the red ring. We took the best care of our Xbox-es, and they still broke, so how can you say that it is our fault? The fact that this happened to many players suggests an epidemic internal error. Second of all, PlayStation is the first company to incorporate a touch screen controller with the lights that come with it. Don't even try to bring the Wii U in it, that controller is entirely different. As I said before, the controller lights up and speaks, with the game.The design is ENTIRELY original. The shape, the setup, everything. Did they simply copy Wii U and put a Sony label on it? Third of all, The PlayStation has always had better graphics. I plugged the Xbox into an HDTV and the graphics were still average compared to PlayStation hooked up to a HDTV. About the costly, expensive Kinnect, trash it, because it is so expensive in addition to the cost of the unit itself, that the PlayStation move controllers are cheaper, and provide an even more spectacular gaming experience! Lastly, The Xbox doesn't have the option where you can buy a small unit called PlayStation TV, connect it to any TV, and have the capability to use the apps on the PlayStation, or even to buy another controller and play games with the small unit! You can even project to another TV screen in case someone wants to watch! In a very respectful manner, I ask you to "Top that."
Ps4 Vs. Xbox One

You actually have an good point there. 1.) When your Xbox broke up over and over again, how can you prove that it wasn't your fault? Many people say that in many shopping sites, for example, I saw this one-star review of a Bose headphones that said "All I did was put it in my school backpack and the extender broke." Maybe you did something like this to your Xbox, but you just didn't know that it was harmful. I have a PS2 right now and we had to replace it because it fell 3 feet INTO A THICK CARPET. The disk won't load and it would make this repeating buzzing sound. 2.) Yes yes yes, I told you that the PS4's graphic is wonderful too, and yes, Sony is famous for graphic qualities over a long period of time, but are you sure the PS4's graphics right now can defeat Xbox's? Look at this YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com... It shows that Xbox has more contrast and clear colors, while PS4's color is kinda deem compared to it, and that's not the only video evidence, search about PS4 vs Xbox One graphics, you'll easily see how it's so separated between the PS4 and Xbox, so instead of just saying that one has very good graphics, prove that it's actually better than Xbox's, and even if one has better graphic quality, framerate is the key. Lower framerate = :( Look at this video: In that video, not only you'll see better colors and renderings on Xbox One, it significantly has higher framrates than the PS4 during an explosion or something that would cause lag. 3.) So the PS4 controllers have the first, integrated touchscreen? Well, not true. Wii U has the first. integrated touchscreen on their controller and sounds comes out of it, and Wii U came out about an year earlier than PS4, so can you prove that PS4 didn't see Wii U's idea and the touchscreen and sound coming out of their controller is 100% from the developer's brain, and now Wii U? Tell me. 4.) See, this is what I was talking about on my first argument. Yes, PS4 has Sony Move, but as I said before, it needs a controller, and without it, it's like an normal Wii without a controller. So yeah, just pointing that out that you've missed my point because Xbox Kinect doesn't need any controllers.
Ps4 Vs. Xbox One

Yeah, I'm just going to use the experience I have as a Sony gamer. First off, I used to have a Xbox. I got one after I had a Ps2. And I have to switch back to Sony after I experienced the red ring, sent it back to Microsoft, and got a new one, over and over and over again. So after I switched back to Sony, I had no problems whatsoever, never had to send it back. Now while I am taking about the brand itself, let's get back to Ps4... First off, look at the wonderful graphics. Hook it up to a HDTV, and wow, It seems as if you could just jump into the game. Man, It really is amazing, and Sony has had better graphics for a long time. Secondly, NO ONE ELSE has the new touch screen technology that was integrated into the controller, or the fact that the light of the controller changes correspondingly with the game. Also, a nice surprise, if someone is talking to you in the game through a com or a radio, the voice comes through the controller. Ps4 provides a nice, realistic gaming experience with a smooth interface and cutting edge technology. And if you even think about bringing up Kinnect, So what. Sony has play station move. Don't forget the exclusive games that are only for Ps4.
Ps4 Vs. Xbox One

I say Xbox One is better, why? Well first off, it actually has better graphics. Yes I know, PS4 does have a better graphic card specs than the Xbox One's. But if you compare and contrast many games, such as GTA V, Call of Duty series, Need For Speed, Halo, and many other famous popular and famous games, you can see that Xbox has way better and clear colors and rendering. For example, when you play GTA V and turn the graphic quality all the way up to maximum on both consoles, you can see that Xbox has better, realistic shadows, brighter and more eye-relaxing colors and when you go to the waterfall, you can see a significant amount of difference of water splashing, there's lots of splashing in Xbox but in PS4 you can still see it good, but in a less realistic water splashes and renderings. Also, when you buy Xbox, even it might be about $100 expensive, it comes with huge bundles such as Forza and other Microsoft games. Even if it's $100 more expensive than the PS4 with the normal price, they lowers the price to about $349 during special holiday seasons such as Christmas while Sony doesn't unless the store gives you a sale for holidays (Which means you will see Xbox cost only $349 in almost every stores during Christmas and other special seasons but you'll have to go to a certain store to get the PS4 with a decreased price.) Also, Xbox has the beautiful Kinect, who doesn't like Kinect? Yes, I know, you can control PS4 with your body using the PS4 camera AND A CONTROLLER like Wii, Xbox doesn't need a controller, just use your magnificent hands to do the work. Xbox which is owned by Microsoft, is a USA company. If you're American, why don't you help your country by buying their product instead of helping Japan by buying theirs (Do not react to this question if you're not American)? Microsoft also makes awesome and mind-breaking games such as Halo, Forza and much more. These games will come with you when you buy Xbox. Yes, I know, you get games too with PS4 when you buy one, but is the game's quality good as the Microsoft/Xbox's? Nope, not that I know of, and don't say that games like GTA V comes with PS4 which makes PS4 awesome, many famous titles like GTA V isn't made by PS4 or Sony, so don't even waste your and my time just mentioning that. And finally, Xbox's hardware is way more durable than PS4's. When some money filled testers dropped PS4 and Xbox One at a height of 15 feet, which can break a person's bones, the case for the Xbox One broke and fell off, but you couldn't see the inside and none of the buttons were harmed, but the PS4's? not really. When it crashed into the floor, it's plastic case was bent and shattered and you could see the HDD, processors, you know, and then when they turned it on, there was no problems or errors with Xbox One, but PS4 wouldn't turn on and kept giving the testers these error messages. See the full article over here ----> http://www.neowin.net... That's it for my first argument, let's see if you got a better one!
Star Wars Debate: Home One vs. Executor

In light of the arguments precented I must concede the debate. Not only will my further points be exhaustive and repetitive they would serve no purpose but to delay the inevitable. In a one on one battle, the Executor would destroy the Home One. As my opponent points out it took an entire fleet to destroy the Executor. If Home One was subjected to the full firepower of the Imperial fleet it too would have been destroyed. As I stared at this debate today I could find no way to creatively and effectively move forward, therefore I must concede.
Star Wars Debate: Home One vs. Executor

TopicHome One is a better vessel than the Executor. ContextHome One: http://starwars.wikia.com...Executor: http://starwars.wikia.com...Rules1. No forfeits2. BOP is as follows: Pro must argue that Home One was the better vessel, whereas Con must argue that Executor was a better vessel3. This debate is just about the ships themselves, and not about their officers, affiliations, etc.4. No new arguments may be presented in each debater's the final speech5. Wookieepedia, canon texts, and the official Star Wars movies are all legitimate sources of information for this debate6. Violation of any of these rules, or of any part of the R1 set-up, constitutes a 7-point lossStructureR1: Pro presents opening argumentsR2: Con presents opening arguments; Pro rebutsR3: RebuttalsR4: RebuttalsR5: Con will offer a rebuttal; Pro will pass on that roundThanks......in advance to CP for what will be an enjoyable, nerdy debate!
Should the BAL for DWI be 0.0%

(K)Actually, some statistics show that there are actually more alcohol related traffic deaths since 1996. The BAC in NYS was lowered from 0.15 to 0.08 in 2003. (s) How could something like this be explained? Having a zero-tolerance policy in the US would not only prevent people who are perfectly fine from getting on the road, but, it would also affect the business of restaurants and bars tremendously. (c/e) Would you be more willing to go out and have a drink or two with friends if you knew that you couldn't even get behind the wheel of your own car? (p) Businesses would suffer tremendously, which would then be further contributing to the decline of the economy. (e)
Should the BAL for DWI be 0.0%

K- I don't believe that anyone no matter their age, weight or gender should be able to get behind the wheel and drive home. I just do not think it is safe for anyone on the road.(i) Many people will argue that they can "hold their alcohol", but there is simply no way to be able to determine this. (e) When drinking alcohol, people do and say things they might not normally say when they are sober, this resulting in people believing that they are okay to drive when it reality they are not okay to drive. (ri) The idea isn't safe. It puts the lives of others in great danger as well as your own. (e) The roads would be a much safer place if there was a law enforcing a no tolerance when it comes to alcohol being in your system while operating a vehicle. (c)
Should the BAL for DWI be 0.0%

(K)The way that an individual burns off alcohol depends on their weight, their gender, and how many drinks they have had in a specific time period. (q) Why should a male, who is 200lbs, and last had a drink over an hour ago, not be able to get behind the wheel and drive? (e) Most people over the legal age limit, know their limits when it comes to having a drink and getting behind the wheel. (i) The BAC should be 0.0% for people under the age of 21, because they shouldn't even be drinking legally in the first place. (i) But for the rest of the general population, why shouldn't someone be able to go out, have a drink with their friends, and be able to drive home one to two hours later? (q) Their BAC would more than likely be over 0.0%, but all of their reasoning and physical attributes should be perfectly normal. (i) There are zero-tolerance countries that use scare tactics to keep people off the road, like immediate revokation of license, hefty fines, car seizure, etc. (q) While the US does not keep to strict ideals like that, why can't they implement these ideas without lowering the BAC? (i) I'm sure it would get people to think twice before drinking too much and then getting behind the wheel.
Should the BAL for DWI be 0.0%

(k) Not everyone would know not to get behind the wheel of a car when they are drunk. I will say that there are many people out there that are very responsible when it comes to going out and having drinks. On the other hand I know of many people who will openly consider themselves "good drunk drivers". This in fact is not okay. How can it be that one person can have one drink and be okay to drive, while another person may have the same drink and not be okay to drive? (e) There is no way to tell who would be okay and who wouldn't be okay. (s) There is no way to see how hard alcohol can hit some people. (s) Your blood alcohol content depends on how much you drink, how much you weigh and how much time passes in between drinks (q). There should be harsher punishments for people who drink and then get behind the wheel of a car. By having the BAL be 0.0% and applying these harsher consequences, it will allow people to see that drinking and driving is not allowed. (c)
Should the BAL for DWI be 0.0%

The legal limit for alcohol consumption being 0.08% causes individuals to have problems with depth perception, peripheral vision, and reasoning. (e) While experiencing these symptoms, an individual would be wise to not get behind the wheel of a car. (i) At lower BAC levels, an individual could have no outward symptoms of intoxication other than talkativeness, lowered inhibitions, and relaxation. (e) For the person who has had one drink and then leaves to go out on the road one hour later, they will more than likely show no signs of intoxication. (i) Not everyone with higher BAC levels experience the same problems and symptoms. (q) Lowering the BAC to 0.0% might not be a great idea because there are certain prescription medications that people take that could cause erratic behavior and make an officer stop and think that a person may be intoxicated. (c/e) There was an instance in 2008, where an Arizona woman was arrested for DWI. Her blood test came back as 0.0%. Officer claims woman had bloodshot eyes, flushed face, and he smelled alcohol on her breath. Woman was not intoxicated, did not even have a drop to drink, she was the designated driver. (i)
Should the BAL for DWI be 0.0%

On July 1, 2003, NYS stated that no one would be able to operate a vehicle with a BAL of 0.08% or more. I think this should be changed to 0.0%. (ri) No one should be able to have any bit of alcohol in their system and then get behind the wheel of a car. (s) In NYS more than 20% of highway deaths involve the use of alcohol o impairment from drugs. (s) Other countries such as Armenia, Hungary and Romania all have BAC levels of 0.0%. (ri) By having it be 0.0% it would decrease the amount of DWI's and people being in jail due to drinking and driving. (s) The roads would also be a safer place if this law were to be put into effect. (c)
money is the root cause of all evils

My opponent asserts that Money is not the root of all evil because the LACK of money is the root of all evil. Im going to use a series of simple equations to prove the my opponent has only proven more so that money is the root of all evil. I would like to put emphasis on the word "root". My opponent says that a lack of money is the root of evil. I ask this. A lack of money is a problem. What is the root of that problem??? Money. If the was no money, there could be no lack of money. The existence of money creates the problem of having a LACK of money, which, in turn, causes evil. You see, a lack of money may cause evil, but the ROOT of the problem is evil. Evil is the thorns, lack of money is the stem they grow on, and money's sheer existence is the roots the give the stem and thorns life. Money is, indeed, the ROOT of all evil.
money is the root cause of all evils

Money!it brings a smile to ur face money!it brings a gleam to ur eyes Money ! that solve all ur problems yes this is money...someone said money is the root cause of all evils but in my opinion lack of maoney is the rot cause of all evils.......whether it be stealing or robbing it all strts bcoz of lack of money not bcoz u have excess of money.....money is the solver of all problem.......cicero once saID THER'S NO WALL SO STRONG THAT money cant break implying money to be solver of all probs nopt the 1 to strt it!!!!!!!!!
Fresh off the boat is the best TV show

You are so STUPID dfghjkcs,dcliubcilbvwuevbviubiuvbewuivbvbruibvrebvwruvbwriuvbbvuvbuvbrvbfbjbkjskbksdbvksdbvsbjkadbvjbvjbvskdbvajkb;bdkjbvkjbewvbrevbreubsbvewbfdvvbbfvbjvbefabvjbvebvbvdjkvbsVBIUVNEBVVIDNVKDISANBBVlbvqrebvruvruvbrjbvadjfbubsurevjbljvfjvbdjvdfjvnremibernbnnjbjbnnbjjsdbburhgubnvjbvreugnvdlvbrbebsbhbhjbbrgbsliberuiglhreihqwliughervuiv guhgieuwhhgfjsdbnjdghmnhuerwighuiol3497y8i9o02orihghrbfnvmrhjnkhgt46783i9owkermnbgtyeuidkmnfhyuiekmnbth5uj4ike,mrntbhy4u0iu98ihn8y0uo hu80ioppk9opl