Donald Trump's child rape case allegations are credible.

RebuttalsOpponents in bold and italics, mine in plain text.Paragraph 1,2 & 3, nothing contradicts what I stated. Except, maybe minor parts I'm not going to bother with. Now my opponent is getting somewhere."Less than 1% of rape allegations are falsely made." (Mic - 15/5/13)The problem is that Donald Trump is a public figure. I'm pretty sure public figures are more likely to be accused. Just for starters more money to sue in civil court. Btw, the plaintiff is asking for a pretty penny of $100 million dollars. [1] "a $100 million lawsuit"This is certainly an insensitive to sue over the average Joe who maybe has $200,000 to his name. Second, the link references the United Kingdom. Last time I checked Donald Trump is a USA citizen. Another study finds 6.8% are false. " Of the 117 cases that could be classified, eight—or 6.8 percent—were determined to be false complaints;" [3].Now combine that with political motive, Donald Trump having lots of money, and being a public figure and we can state there is a good chance the allegations are trumped up. ""Katie Johnson", has made two separate claims about Trump for the same circumstances, the 1st was thrown for administrative reasons after Trump"s lawyer implies the victim doesn"t exist. Upon the second attempt, a witness ("Tiffany Doe", allegedly connected to the already convicted friend of Trump, Epstein) is brought forward to back up the story. " We still don't know if Katie Johnson nor Tiffany Doe are even real people. This could just be a hoax. "This already shows that there is a level of determination by the apparently non-existent victim to pursue this complaint. I would suggest that a hoax wouldn"t bother make a second attempt if already discredited." Flickr_G100 million dollars says otherwise."Trump"s lawyer, Garten, suggests that because the address and telephone aren"t registered to the victim, it implies proof of dishonesty, but when we are also told that they have less than $300 to their name, there is a plausible argument that the victim might not be able to afford a permanent residence or phone contract of their own. An alternative scenario could be that following her time as a "sex slave" she was forced into a life on the streets, therefore giving a friend"s contact details or squatting at the foreclosed house at the time of filling the report." Flickr_GWhy wouldn't she just tell the court she was homeless then? I could understand if she was younger, but give the dates she must be over 30. "Ethically, should not all alleged crimes be investigated? If there is no evidence or witnesses to prove a connection between the two ladies and Trump, then the case would be dismissed anyway. Is it not a bigger risk to just ignore the allegation?" Flickr_GThe police have limited time and resources. They cannot take too much time away from more serious crimes. Also, going through a trial is stressful and time consuming for the defendant innocent or guilty. "His ex wife, Ivana, accused him of "raping" her in 1989. She was later made to sign a gagging order in regards to their marriage, but was granted a divorce on the grounds of "cruel and inhuman treatment" against her by Trump. Even when she retracted her statement, this was not in full, changing the definition of the word rape, from a physical act to an emotional state. Twenty years on a court would probably conclude that the aggressive act, still constitute some form of sexual assault. (Independent - 27/1/16)" Flickr_GIvana said she retracted her statement and is best of friends with Trump. This is really good evidence that no harm was done to Ivana. "I have recently read some comments attributed to me from nearly 30 years ago at a time of very high tension during my divorce from Donald," she said in the statement today. "The story is totally without merit. Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised 3 children that we love and are very proud of." [4]"Jill Harth Houraney accused Trump of sexually assaulting her over a business contract in 1993. It is particularly notable that she said Trump refers to making her his "sex slave" a term used in the Johnson accusations. (NY Daily - 6/5/97)" The case was withdrawn."But yesterday, as Trump vigorously denied her charges, the woman's husband said she was planning to withdraw her suit. Trump told us that the suit "was a desperate attempt to get me to settle a case they can't win." [5]"Selina Scott, accused Trump of stalking and sending her abusive correspondence in 1995, after she said "unflattering" things about him in a documentary. (Telegraph - 27/1/16)" Stalked mentally? With letters? [6] You misrepresented the facts to make Trump look worse here. Big difference between physically stalking someone versus sending letters.The rest seems irrelevant to me. No authorities should not investigate every singe accusation made against people. There simply is not enough resources to perform such a deed. Thanks for debating. My other opponents on the subject made very little effort. Sources3. http://www.slate.com...4. http://abcnews.go.com...5. http://www.nydailynews.com...6. http://www.telegraph.co.uk...