Pewdiepie sucks

Hey! I'm going to begin by stating your last argument about chuggaaconroy because I find it extremely ironic, should you state something like it. "Let me just say this, his cat just recently died about a month ago and before his cat died he was uploading content daily. Also just recently he went to Momocon Atlanta. So you just can't say Chuggaconroy uploads 2 videos at a time without knowing the history of the channel itself." Let me just ask you one simple question: Who brought up the topic of chuggaaconroy? Me? You? I guess so. It is your evidence/citation so you should be fully informing me about him, not me. Why should I research? If I say something I should explain it and so should you if you do. Pretty basic rule of debates right? "his cat just recently died about a month ago and before his cat died he was uploading content daily. " Also, if you look closely, last month he uploaded about 15 to 16 videos, averaging to about 1 videos per 2 days (April was 30 days long). I don't see how that can be very regular for someone who started uploading 8 years (channel About) ago compared to pewdiepie who started 5 years ago. Please don't say that it is because of the content he uploads, since his channel is almost entirely dedicated to Pokemon (which if you didn't know is a game). Since you yourself state "Since Pewdiepie is a gaming channel, he doesn't have to edit anything at ALL." Serious youtubers like Pewdiepie, overwork and produce videos before events and conferences, so that their upload rate is not affected. I am not against chuggaa, In fact I feel sad for his loss. Its just you who is trying to bring up something emotional, when it can be explained pretty easily. ------ Moving onto to your other arguments..... "" First of all, you don't have to have tutorials about games to automatically make yourself a gaming channel. Also I don't see how this DISSAPROVES of the fact that Pewdiepie isn't a gaming channel. Your basically saying that Pewdiepie records games but he doesn't make tutorials, so that means he isn't a gaming channel. This makes no sense what so ever."" Actually your statement does not make any sense. Here's why.... If you reread my statement you will find that I have included the word "entirely". The sentence is "He is not entirely into gaming and as I mentioned before he does not play games as if he were giving a tutorial." Basically, he is not fully a gamer, he does other things like vlogs and rants. He is not a GAMER he is an YOUTUBER. There's a difference.He frequently changes between vlogs, games, rants, fridays-with-pewds and other series. ---------------- " I'm sorry friend, it seems that you don't know the definiton of a COLLABORATION. Tons of other channels do this to. So your saying that all the other channels that have animations made by other people, should've already been copyrighted? "Lastly, it takes a lot of time, money, and dedication to start a channel.(btw I watched the video)." I have some things to say about this: But firstly, I have to point out that my opponent is not clearly stating things and often has resorted to changing his arguments. I can bet that he did not include the word "COLLABORATION" before. Secondly, Stealing and Collaborating with someone is very different. I know what a collab is. ------- " Besides, Pewdiepie, has I have stated once again, thought youtube as his JOB, so he can make MONEY. That's why he used the "expensive" way to get the necessary equipment in order to work. He never gave a second thought of entertaining people." I was the first one to say that PewDiePie took it up as a job, not YOU. Please stop being extremely hypocritical. Also, what do you mean by "expensive"? That word makes no sense in this context. He never thought of entertaining people? 44 million people are really stupid right? No. "Ok, I agree that it takes a good amount of money to create a youtube channel. But, you can take all of the amount of money needed for making a youtube channel and make it by one, getting recording software. There, problem solved people." This makes no sense whatsoever. I can understand making a few grammatical errors and typos, but there has to be a limit. "Also. since Pewdiepie is a gaming channel, it really doesn't take any time and dedication for him to keep his channel going. The amount of time his video has is literally all the work he's done. If you count playing video games work that is. Also, you only have to upload one video per day. omg so hard."You talk like as if you have 10 youtube channels earning you millions. I'm not an youtuber but after watching countless draw my life's, backstories about youtubers, I assert that it takes a lot of effort to be one. A SUCCESSFUL ONE. Also, nothing can run without dedication. Nothing. If Pewds was not dedicated, he would be uploading 2 videos daily and even when he is on tour. ---------- -"I was never against any comedy or informative science channel anyway." I never said you were. When you said that Pewdiepie has to do a lot of editing AND work, I was just comparing the amount of work Pewdiepie does compared to the comedy and informative channels. Obviously they do more work than Pewdiepie. I also never said that because it's Pewdipies fault that these type of channels get lesser amounts of money because of him. Again the con is pointing out false statements so he can look like he's making a valid argument." Just one word - HYPOCRITE Try to properly imply what you're saying because not everyone has exactly the same interpretation of something, rather than claiming you have done your best. You are covering up for your last arguments that I have already successfully managed to counter. I may sound a bit arrogant, but trust me the truth is bitter. ---------- -"EVERY FAMOUS PERSON ON YOUTUBE HAS MONOTIZED THEIR VIDEO BECAUSE EVERYONE WANTS MONEY." (sorry I forget the want).'Why do you think I have been trying to imply all the way long." Let me take this quote from one of your previous arguments.'There are only a handful of people who are famous but haven't monotized their videos." Now the con is being a hypocrite to try and show a valid argument. " Ironic thing is pro is calling me a hypocrite. Please reread my Round 2. ---------------- -"He did youtube because he loved gaming, we wanted to feel happy, and wanted/needed money. He did youtube really for his own benefit." 'Those sentences have no co-relation to each other.' Yes, they actually do, unfortunately for you,. If you had a job, you would want that job to be fun, yes? You would want it to be something you would enjoy. But you also shouldn't forget that the main purpose of a job is to get money." The main purpose of a job is to earn money? But, you can earn money only when you are happy? If PewDiePie did youtube for money, he could just copy other's content and post it on facebook (freebooters) and get away with it. Some People actually do that to earn. But, no he works very hard to produce his videos and NEVER steals content. Collabs are different, like you said. "This means that the same people could watch Pewdiepie's videos over and over again, and their views would still count. Also, it would actually be IMPOSSIBLE for everybody in the world to know who Pewdiepie is since 4.4 BILLION PEOPLE DON'T EVEN HAVE ACCES TO INTERNET. Here's the link." http://www.npr.org...... I don't know why you try to counter something, I meant as an obvious joke (Metaphor). With the experiment thingy, I don't know what your aim was, but it was pretty futile. I gained nothing out of it. It's pretty goddamn obvious what one view on youtube means. This has a serious loophole btw. PewDiePie has over 2800 videos. - "Also, as I mentioned before, 4.4 billion people don't have access to internet. Which means that some of the top leading countries in the world in terms of population don't have internet as a majority. Also, keep in mind that 31st is still a long ways from even the top ten. Plus Sweden didn't really care about youtube at all for that time." Those 4.4 Billion people could be facing war, stuck in a natural calamity or dying from starvation. I honestly believe that their first priority would be peace and food, rather than PewDiePie and Internet. https://en.wikipedia.org... Sweden has about 9.6 million people, making it the 90th most populous country. The first two sentences are wrong as china has nearly 51% of the population with internet. For the rest, the first priority would be to get them food and shelter rather than internet. Something that I noticed in round 2 " Also, Pewdiepie at an advantage being in Sweden because in Sweden, there weren't many competitors, thus leading to Pewdiepies channel beginning to wax. Also since his girlfriend, Marzia, is italian, he visitied Italy once to visit Marzia while he was still making videos. Then he began to dominate Italy. Let me remind you that this aren't countries at the time that really cared about youtube at all. " As an youtuber, you have to compete with people from all over the world, not just your home country. Also " Then he began to dominate Italy" That statement just honestly blew my mind. Dominate Italy? He is Felix Kjellberg not Hitler or some other political dictator. This argument is just a last minute resort to include more content, without actually worrying whether the content makes any sense or not. --------- In Conclusion however, PewDiePie is a good youtuber because he spends a lot of time preparing and doing his videos. The pro seems to have a problem with him and thus says that he "sucks". Anyways best of luck! Also, I would like the house to know that pro said this " Well I wish the best of luck to you and I hope you can come up with valid arguments!" in his last argument. I don't know if that was meant to be serious or funny, but telling me to come up with a proper argument is rude and offensive. Thanks.