God Exists

Argument: In the 8th century,during a mass,the bread and wine turned into actual flesh and blood. Years later,scientists investigated the miracle and came to the following conclusions: 1.The Flesh is striated muscular tissue of the myocardium (heart wall), having no trace whatsoever of any agents used for preservation. 2.The Blood and the Flesh were found to belong to the rare blood type AB. 3.The Blood of the Eucharistic miracle was found to contain the following minerals: chloride, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, sodium and calcium, all normal components of blood. The protein components were normally fractionated with the same percentage ratio as those found in normal fresh blood. 4.All the scientists agreed that the Flesh and Blood would have rapidly decayed without effective preservatives. Professor Linoli, famous for anatomical studies, conclusively excluded the possibility of a fraud, affirming that no human hand could have made such an expert cut from the Heart, which was made tangentially, that is, a round cut, thick on the outer edges and lessening gradually and uniformly into the empty central area. Source:http://www.traditioninaction.org...... Oh and a little bit more about the miracle of lanciano,when scientists cut the piece of flesh,each piece was 15.85 grams. How is this special? Take a look: Original piece:15.85 grams Each cut piece:15.85 grams Source:https://www.michaeljournal.org...... If god does not exist, then how could this miracle have occured? Is it plausible to say that this can be explained by science when there is no scientific explanation for this? I"m open for explanations but the last I checked there was not a single explanation for this miracle. And if you"re wondering why there isnt an explanation for this(or at least one I could not find) from science,the definition of a miracle is an event which is inexplicable by natural or scientific laws and hence attributed to divine agency. Oh and trust me if you can debunk this with science, you"d win the nobel prize or something even greater. Question for my opponent: If god does not exist, is it plausible to say this can be explained by science when there is no scientific explanation for this? Rebuttal(s): "2. If God is omnipotent, then God has the power to eliminate all evil. 3. If God is omniscient, then God knows when evil exists. 4. If God is morally perfect, then God has the desire to eliminate all evil. 5. Evil exists. 6. If evil exists and God exists, then either God doesn't have the power to eliminate all evil, or doesn't know when evil exists, or doesn't have the desire to eliminate all evil. 7. Therefore, God doesn't exist. This proposition shows that it is logically impossible for God to exist." If both evil and god exists, doesnt it already proove god exists? Anyways moving on:In the movie infinity wars,the character doctor strange gave Thanos the time stone and that in the end caused Thanos to win at the end of the movie. But if you watched the movie closely,you would have noticed the infinity gauntlet was shattered after Thanos snapped his fingers. So sometimes to win,we need to take a step back. This is the exact same thing over here. God is letting evil have a temporary win in order to win. That point was for things like demons. For evil on this earth:Never forget god gave us free will but people chose to abuse it and hence evil. And this is the work of demons and hence it goes back to my first point with the infinity war reference. "1. If God knows everything (due to his omniscience), he knows what it feels like to lie. If he knew what it feels like to lie, he must have done it, therefore undermining his omnibenevolence." God created all things,all feelings so just because he knows what it feels like to lie doesnt mean that he did lie. 2."God can cause an unpredictable event. If he did so, he would not be able to know the outcome of the event, therefore undermining his omniscience." Firstly,if you cause something, you would know the outcome. Lastly, you said and I quote,"If he did so..." By saying the word IF it means it didnt happen so your point wont be of any use. "3. If God can do anything, he can create an object he cannot move. If he were unable to move that object, however, he would not be able to do anything therefore undermining his omnipotence." Put yourself into the shoes of god:you are making things for pretty much the entire universe. Why would you want to make something which cant be moved? Plus you already said the word IF so it means it hasnt happened yet as stated in my previous rebuttal so your point wont make much use.