Old Spongebob (PRO 1999-2005) is better than New Spongebob (CON 2006-now)

No offense, but this how an argument is supposed to be. This isn't sharing opinions. And long arguments are what win the debate. Well then, now for rebuttals. "I was reading like to first paragraph of your argument and I was like ok." So... are you stating that my argument was just okay, without giving any sort of reasoning? "But then I saw that u wrote a 200 page essay" Exaggeration at its finest. My goodness, do you even get the point of debating here? It is not about writing one weak paragraph, it's about writing as much as you can and giving concrete reasoning for your argument. People like you personally frustrate me, as you are claiming that quantity surpasses quality. "Woah....that is way too much sh*t for SPONGEBOB" No it isn't. Spongebob is widely talked about and people do this all the time. People on Debate.org fill up all of the characters in an argument ALL THE TIME. You're the one taking things seriously, this is how debaters are supposed to argue. "I mean you are going to run out of idea for SpongeBob sometime." Ok, so how does that make it better than Old Spongebob? Sounds more like an excuse than an argument. It also implies that New Spongebob is not good. "There is no right or wrong answer" So that's it? You're equivocating, which breaks one of my rules once again. If you accept the debate and read the rules, than you have no excuse for projecting a poor argument. This is Debate.org, where you are supposed to argue effectively with your opponent, not to share opinions. You don't say there is no right or wrong unless you don't care about winning an argument. Although the quote is true, it makes you seem like you have no clear opinion. "I meant the Spongebob movie" Ok, if you look at the argument title, that's in the Old Spongebob era. You've said that Band Geeks, Suds, and The Spongebob Movie were good. As for New Spongebob in a later quote, you state that one episode, Spongebob V.S The Big One, was good. So you are giving more sources for Old Spongebob than New Spongebob, meaning you are unaware that you support both. Once again making your opinion seem opaque and all over the place. Look, I am not trying to be mean, but your acceptance to this debate was immediately shoved out of the door with little regard. If you're going to accept my debate, you are aware of the consequences. You say that you don't have time to read my argument, don't care about grammar, and make your opinion opaque at worst, and unclear at best. You just don't care about debating anymore, and you hardly tried. You probably shouldn't have accepted this debate, expecting I might be this illiterate man who doesn't know how to debate. I'm sorry, but constructive criticism is what makes you stronger. If I don't tear your argument apart, you will never learn what a good argument is. But if you don't even care, then you might as well forfeit. And to be honest, I think Spongebob V.S The Big One is alright. I thought they could've done better with the comedy, and the episode could be dull at times. He also says, "One of you will not return," meaning one of the people he is speaking to. Instead, he doesn't return. I didn't expect them to kill a character, but at least have him say "One of us will not return." Your entire argument can be summed up as: -Making claims without providing much reasoning -Sub par grammar -Equivocation -Getting all offended by someone arguing on Debate.org, which is what we're supposed to do -Saying New Spongebob isn't terrible, while not explaining why Old Spongebob is worse, but rather, providing three sources out of four that are Old Spongebob episodes. Well, this should pose an automatic win for PRO, as CON doesn't seem to care about continuing the debate.