Santa Claus could exist

What I was saying is that you said "jolly red suit that we know today. " That means you're trying to prove that the modern Santa exist. The modern Santa has beliefs and myths about him that you must adhere to in your case. "Furthermore, I am not leaving my base by saying that there could be more Santas if they reproduced. They still use reindeer to travel, still travel on Christmas Eve (or 5th December, depending where you live), and probably wear the same clothes. The only difference is that there is more than one Santa, since there are now more children. Even if the original Santa is dead (notice that I am not confirming anything, merely suggesting, as my aim is to prove that the possibility that Santa Claus could exist is not 0). " 1. Nowhere in folklore does it say Santa has help. 2. Where would they live? The North Pole? I thought it was a house on the North Pole? I'm to assume an entire generation of Santas live there? "I also request my opponent to not write his points in verse form, please, as it can get confusing. " It was a c/p, sorry. However, it did show a little debunking in your quantum physics statement that you failed to give attention to. "Santa may not travel by space, I am saying that he could, to not suffer from the things the author of that (in)famous article talked about. " Why are we arguing the validity of the article again? "Since my opponent also references the article, I shall continue to discuss it before I introduce the idea of quantum physics. This article assumes that there are good children in every corner of the Earth, in every single land mass on Earth; every few kilometres (or was it miles? ). Doesn't that seem ludicrous? There aren't that many people in places like Greenland, Iceland, Antarctica, etc. Therefore, Santa can skip over these areas rather quickly. He can, also, continue to accelerate here, as he doesn't have to make stops. " Again, why are we disproving/proving the article? You fail to take into account that there are families with more than one child. Even if one is bad, another is bound to be good. You must assume every 1 in 2 household is stopped by San, at least. "As I said, there are 2 billion children in the World. 2 billion people UNDER 18. Does everyone under 18 believe in Santa? As I recall, "those who don't believe, don't receive", or something along those lines, right? " Again, the family thing. Also, there are adults that may or may not still believe in Santa Claus. Santa does not discriminate on whether or not you're a child. "ï¿½ How can you treat land reindeer the same as flying reindeer? If they are an undiscovered species, then no one (escept Santa, obviously) knows anything about their strength, stamina, etc" Nothing is possible unless proven otherwise, scientifically speaking. You cannot fly without any sort of mechanism that helps you. If you cannot prove it, it has to be considered nonexistant. It's how it is in courts; no evidence, then the accused walks. "ï¿½ No matter how ludicrous it seems, if these are new species, then they may be able to resist such enormous energy exposure. They are used to flying, maybe even in space, so they may also be developed to stand this much energy exposure. " You can't assume about an undiscovered species. "So, in conclusion, why does the author of this article assume that there is at least one good child per household? Why assume that the houses are evenly distributed, and that every single area on the Earth has the same population? Why not take into account parallel processing? Why not take into account the theory that Santa can warp time? Why not make mention of the possibility that there is more than one Santa now? Who says that Santa can't do what he needs to do in a few seconds? Housewives do it all the time in the discount periods! " Again, we're not arguing about the validity of the article; I'm not even sure how we got on that subject anyhow. You speak of Santa warping time after you elaborated so much on how it would be "possible" for a Santa to do all this without any sort of supernatural assistance (sans the reindeer and such. ) Discrepancies. Santa Claus, as today knows him, uses a sleigh and stops at each household all across the world in one night. This is biologically impossible. In conclusion, I'm not sure how exactly we got on the subject of arguing the validity of the article. Santa Claus was supposed to have completed his trip without any sort of warping time, because the zeitgeist (as my opponent said, today) views him as a figure that does it without any sort of assistance of that caliber. Santa Claus is viewed as the same person, as immortal. Santa Claus children would have to go through the same process anyhow. Saying there could be more than one Santa on the night of Christmas poses a discrepancy to the arguments my opponent made. Thank you for a great debate and happy holidays.