The Christian God is Omniscient and Omnibenevolent II

Although I personally do not believe in the Christian God, I was raised Roman Catholic and had many of the debatable points mentioned by my opponent brought up within my own mind throughout my life. Although the bible states a lot of situations in which God is vengeful and rains his wrath down upon our world, I will be debating from a purely logical basis alone, and not from the logical inconsistencies within the bible's God. Thus the acts of God in the bible, and any act of God I shall be ignoring and instead be discussing the logical consistency of a Omniscient and Omnibenevolent God's existence. God's Inability 1: If God is Omniscient then he is able to see all that exists at all times, as well as all the acts that he and all other beings that exist commit within those times. 2: If God is Omnibenevolent then he is an all loving God. This is the idea that God is a loving God who does not act in evil or cruel ways, (At least this is what I have grown to learn that it means). 3: The basic idea that states that these aspects of God deny each other is that If God knew we were to fail or to act wrongly, and if he were a truly loving being, why did he not intervene? For by not intervening he would deny his Omnibenevolence, or that he did not know that it would occur, and thus couldn't and as such deny his Omniscience. 4: I state that this is only a problem should God be Omnipotent, that is, if he is all powerful and or able to intervene in our acts upon the earth. If God is able to stop such acts is such that if he doesn't then he is not all loving, or that he did not intervene because he did not know that it would occur. But, If God does not posses the ability to interact with this world, then it places God into a peculiar situation. For then he would truly be a loving God, with the capability of seeing all evil in the world, and all acts that we will ever commit before him; But due to his inability to interact with the world then neither his Omniscience nor his Omnibenevolence are denied. He posses them both, but is unable to act. Free Will 1: The argument based on free will is one that argues that God, even if he were able to interact with the world, cannot due to free will. A: God gave us free will because he loved us. B: To act in any way, whether beneficial or detrimental to us, upon our plane of existence would deny our free will. C: By denying us Free Will by his action goes against his act of love by giving it to us in the first place, thus Denying his Omnibenevolence. -God Knew what we would do with our free will, but because he loved us he gave it to us. To have seen what we would do with free will and deny us it would have been to deny us his love. Idea of Hell 1: The idea of hell is brought up by my opponent by stating that God Punishes mankind for not acting rightly. 2: There exists another idea of Hell, which many Christians today have begun to take upon themselves, which is linked directly to our free will, it is the Hell which is created by the separation of God. A: To accept God and act for him is to accept heaven. B: To deny God, or act against him is to accept separation from him. C: If we deny God then we do so with the free will he gave us, and as above, for him to take away that free will is to deny his Omnibenevolence. It is the free will of Man, not the act of God, which creates a Hell for mankind by his own action. -God Knew we would choose to deny and separate ourselves from him, but it is by our own free will that we condemn ourselves to hell, not his actions. -(Another idea is this. God is Good, God is Love, To separate oneself from God is to separate oneself from Good, to separate oneself from Love) Idea of Time 1: As humans we experience time linearly, that is in a line. When time occurs it is the present, when time has gone by, the past, and what will occur is the future. 2: God on the other hand may not experience time in the same fashion. For if God were to experience all time as we do the present. Then there is NO way for him to act to stop that which occurs at that time. I. E. : God sees Jonny Doing X at Y time. But For God Jonny is doing X Now, and has already Done X at Y time. - For many this is a complicated idea, but if God experiences all time at the same time and not linearly like mankind, then he cannot act on future events for they have already occurred.