God is the Most Logical Conclusion for our Existence

Have a happy Holiday! Those were in fact, "RANDOM ARGUMENTS" Random: odd, unusual, or unexpected. So yes. your arguments are in fact random. I stand by this statement. "GOD IS A BEING WHO EXPLAINS HIS OWN EXISTENCE. ASKING WHAT THE EXISTENCE OF GOD IS LIKEGod IS LIKE IS SIMILAR TO ASKING WHAT CAUSES FIRE TO BE HOT, OR WHAT CAUSES TRIANGLES TO HAVE THREE SIDES. THE ANSWER IS EXPLAINED IN THE NATURE OF THE THING. FIRE HAS A NATURE TO BE WARM, TRIANGLES HAVE A NATURE TO HAVE 3 SIDES, AND GOD HAS A NATURE TO EXIST" Nope. It's like asking how the fire/triangle got there. It's not in anythings nature to just "exist"... "If god have us free will, why am I not able to do the things my will desires?" "This argument is flawed. What you will and what is logically possible is very different. God gives us the ability to choose what choices we make--That is free will. He did not create us so that we could do everything. Therefore my argument still stands" Exactly my point mate. If god gave me the choice to do whatever I want, then why am I not able to do whatever I want? "Because he did not create us to do everything" Then it's not free will... Because I cannot do whatever I want... Thank You. "The essentials of this argument are simple. While God might tolerate some evils for a greater good (such as free will) there are other evils that seem to serve no greater good and are not a result of free will, such as Cancer, Hurricanes, and other things that kill millions a year. Therefore: 1. If pointless evils exist, then God does not exist. 2. Pointless evils exist. 3. God does not exist. Answer: God has good reasons for allowing natural evils to exist. This is not to assume that we always know reasons that a particular evil has occurred. There are general reasons that show why God cold have for allowing us to suffer. Examples include building our character and developing virtue, something that is impossible in the "toy world". Many virtues that make the world a better place are practiced in responses to evil. Consider:" "Courage to do what's right in the face of danger" So according to you, these deeds are justified in a way for they will give the other person "Valuable" attributes to help them in their future. Notice that god does not just put these traits inside of us, avoiding the countless of human's mass murders, wars, torture, r*pes, slow deaths... God allows these things to happen because he thinks it is the BEST WAY to give us these traits! Even though the people involved in each of these will either be scarred for life or mercilessly killed, so therefor even though they had to go through all that suffering they do not receive anything, it is for the greater good of someone else! So... That would mean that god values others lives over everyone who has pointlessly died. Is that correct pro? Do you actually think that these deeds people commit give us courage? Consider: Ridiculous, sickening, and immoral. "Suffering alongside someone" Oh yes, clearly. God wants us to suffer alongside someone, that gives us a "Greater good" You see it was bad enough when it could have just been one person, but god decides that both people need to suffer. So that they can be scarred for life together. Really? Is it true that someones love for one another increases when you and them both get tortured and starved to near death at some war camp? Is it a greater service that god is doing us there? Why not have the two people bump into each other and start talking, rather than having them both suffer? "Putting your own needs ahead of your own" I don't know how exactly one will succeed in putting their own needs ahead of their own needs, but let's move on. "Therefore any explanation beyond the universe must be beyond space, time, matter, or energy"or what we call God. In other words, if the universe has an explanation, and cannot explain itself, it follows that God explains why the universe exists. Since this logic is deductive, it means that if each of the premises are true, then the answer must be true with 100% accuracy." No. Let me show you something called retro causality: This is the idea that the effect can happen before the cause. Such a thing is observed in quantum mechanics [http://arstechnica.com......] [http://arxiv.org......]. Why couldn"t this be the cause? Why accept God over retro-causality? The effect could have come before the cause, meaning pro's logic has a loophole. Thank You. Also, about the greater good: Some evil is actually greater than the "GOOD" ahead of it. There are better ways to achieving that good rather than killing people off. ANOTHER VIDEO: https://m.youtube.com... MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!