The existence of God is plausible

I would like to point out that I stated in the beginning of this debate that the burden of proof is to be shared. I would also like to point out that my opponent has not provided any evidence against the existence of god.I would like to point out that the existence of God, by definition, is not nor has been one that is a falsefiable hypothesis. The definition of God is one that bends and breaks all laws of physics and opporates on a level of invisibility, and as such cannot be disproven.God created matter. This breaks the laws of conservation of energyGod is omnipresent. This violates the laws of E=MC^2God is omnipotent. This violates the entire process of time as we know it.God is not detectable by any means. This simply violates all logical understanding of science, as everything thus far has been detectable in one way or another, even if we have yet to physically see or identify it.I would like to ask why the burden of proof of his existence or lack thereof has to be shared when it realistically is impossible to disprove by definition.I agree, many animals seem to demonstrate self awareness. What's your point? I never stated that humans are the only creatures to be self aware.God makes it a point to let humans know that humans are special, that we are the pinnaccle of His creation [1]. Self awareness is above all one of the highest forms of intelligence and one that is currently one of the rarest. Sharing this trait with other creatures severely lessons our stats as being the pinnaccle, as we aren't the only ones who are aware of ourselves.1 Anthropic principleI would like to point out a few things wrong here.A: Life (AS WE KNOW IT). That's a very large difference than just saying life. Again, we have no way of ruling out that life can exist outside of the parameters that we have on this planet. It is entirely possible that life can exist with no oxygen, with no water, in thousand degree temperature, in 0 degree temperature and so on.B: It is incredibly lofty to assume that life is infact incredible and a rare occurance. Consider, there are hundreds billions of stars in our galaxy[2], each with at least one planet, and there are hundreds billions of galaxies in the universe[3]. There is also speculation that there are 10^10^10^7 of universes in the multiverses[4]. Of ALL the planets in all of that we've visited 2. If anything, the likelihood that life only occured once out of those odds is incredible.It is substantially more likely that we simply don't have the technology to reliably assume or predict how much life there is in the universe. Discussing its rarity or likelyhood is not worthwhile to spend time because it's pretty assuredly incorrect.2 Free WillEvaluating in of itself is not a case of free will. Acting on situations that are very similar in a different manner is a very huge indicator of free will. I would also like to point out that Pro has not argued against the link I provided or the example of the cat given.God can see the future [5] as shown in the link providedFurther more om·nip·o·tent adjective adjective: omnipotent 1. (of a deity) having unlimited power; able to do anything. By that definition, able to do anything includes able to see the future. The rest of point 2 more or less is moot as not only is God described as being able to see the future, but your point rests on whether or not the future would be foreseeable.3 Can a machine be self aware? Emotions are chemical reactions and our reactions are pretty much controlled by our emotions. This is why drugs like Extacy make us feel good, why Zoloft makes us not feel depressed, and why Heroin makes us feel lethargic and Cocaine makes us feel energetic. It is simply the case of setting a perameter in a computer that says "If this chemical is present, display these sets of emotions"Computers can visualize and see things now. I don't need to bring up the Xbox1 or smartphones being able to view your face and identify you as you.Consciousness exists as the ability to act and do things differently. This increases your odds for survivability as you can thus learn and act accordingly depending on a variety of circumstances. This also prevents you from being predictable and thus being easy prey or an easily avoidable predator. The flu will work the exact same way and hit the exact same targets. Lions will hunt similarly, but some will have larger prides, more focused groups, more tighter groups, etc.In an attempt to disprove God, I shall present these questions-Why does God no longer show himself when He actively was showing Himself pretty consistantly in the bible? Isn't it more likely that he never existed and people hallucinated or imagined it?-Why were miracles common place in the bible and simply do not exist or are easily shown to be fraud now? Is it likely that miracles never happened and people either lied or simply did not understand what was happening?-What created God?-Where is God?-How does God last forever? This violates many laws of energy-How is God everywhere? This violates many laws including nothing being able to move faster than light-How does God know everything including the future?-How is God capable of doing anything? This requires tremendous energy-How is God simply undetectable? This logically doesn't make sense-How does God circumvent physics?-If a god did exist, is it more likely that it does not display any of the qualities we have given it? (aka not omnipotent, not omnipresent etc)[1] http://calvarylife.org...[2]http://www.rmg.co.uk...[3]http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov...[4]http://www.universetoday.com...[5]http://www.scriptureinsights.com...