Women Have It Much Easier Than Men In This Day and Age

My opponent posted their argument in the comments, which I will reproduce here.Responses to my rebuttal of 1P1:2P1A: "your point was ridiculous, "for every woman who finds or was found by a male partner, there is one male partner who has successfully found or was found by a female partner". She was the chooser, you missed the whole point, you're just being a smart a$$."1. [[Citation STILL needed]]. My opponent fails to prove that this point is true, except by asserting that it is so. For all we know, in the real world it may be that men 'choose' women more often than men 'choose' women, because my opponent has provided NO empirics.2. I don't think I either missed your point or was cheeky, while I do believe that you fit both of the previous descriptions by using words such as "ridiculous" and "smart-a$$". Moreover, it cannot be discounted that a male-female relationship inherently requires participation by both a male and a female, and that this inherently leads to male participation in said relationships.2P1B: "Sex is good. But twisting it around and finding a side effect isnt disproving anything I said."1. [[Citation STILL needed]].2. Actually, "finding a side effect" does disprove what you said, because I have proven that sex has negative effects, while my opponent have failed to prove that sex has ANY positive effects. Because my opponent provides no evidence, in this debate sex is still currently considered "bad". Regardless of my personal opinion, this is a result of my opponent failing to provide evidence.3. My opponent fails to mention how sexual interaction in rape and domestic violence is "good".2C1: I would also like to offer one more argument, namely that of masturbation. If sex is, indeed, good, then my opponent must provide a reason that having sex with oneself (ie, masturbation) is worse than having sex with another.---Response to my rebuttal of 1P2:2P2: "If a woman was say a construction worker or brick layer, then yes I would say they are not equally suited. As a mans productivity and work load would be higher typically do to the strength gap. Thus he should earn more, as he is working more."1. [[Citation STILL needed]] for the pay-gap assertion.2. [[Citation needed]] for the assertion that men are stronger than women. I'm not disputing this -- merely that my opponent doesn't support it, and we can't accept it in this debate.3. If, ONLY in specific jobs, were men paid more than women because they were able to contribute significantly more work, then that would be different. However, in the real world, in ALL jobs women face discrimination and a pay gap. My opponent thus does not meet the BoP of the resolution.4. My opponent does NOT rebut my point that if women and men are in the same jobs, then the women WOULD get paid less.5. My opponent does NOT rebut my point that rhetoric like that of my oppponent is the cause of these differences.6. My opponent does NOT rebut my point that prostitution is terrible and that better alternatives exist.---Response to my rebuttal of 1P3:2P3: "This is more opinion, however I would say a good chunk or so of those victimized women deserve what they get. There is no law for the mental abuse of the ongoing and relentless quote "crazy screaming bitch". I am aware all women are not like this, and I am aware men can be like this as well. Worth mentioning though."1. My rebuttal of 1P3 is NOT opinion, unlike that of my opponent, seeing as I provided two sources to substantiate my claim that women are hurt far more often in intimate violence and sexual violence than men are. My opponent needs to prove that women who are hurt in these situations "deserve" said violence, and a reasonable basis for when a person "deserves" to be raped or to be harmed.2. I can't rebut "There is no law for the mental abuse of the ongoing and relentless quote 'crazy screaming bitch' " simply because I don't understand what point my opponent is trying to make. However, I assume that my opponent is talking about how some women are annoying sometimes, which, of course, FULLY justifies violence, much like attacking your coworkers when they annoy you. Oh, wait.---Response to my rebuttal of 1P4:2P4: "Again you missed the entire point. This entire article is regarding survival and replication. Your baby making machine point is irrelevant but I could use your twisted logic here "it can be reasonably asserted that for every woman who produces a baby with a male partner, there is one male partner who has successfully produced a baby with a female partner due to the nature of the relationship"."1. Which "entire article"? I didn't provide an article here, and neither did my opponent.2. That logic is pretty solid (sex is required for babies in non-technologically-assisted circumstances), but it doesn't justify having babies or forcing women to have babies WHATSOEVER.3. My opponent does NOT rebut my point that the fact of evolution does NOT justify forced babymaking.4. My opponent does NOT rebut my point that the theory of evolution does NOT justify ANYTHING.---Response to my rebuttal of 1P5:None.My opponent does NOT contend that I won 1P5, so extend the fact that women generally attempt suicide at a higher rate than men, which nullifies ANY impact from 1P6.---Response to my rebuttal of 1P6:2P6: "I agree with you[.]"1. Great.2. However, we still disagree about the fact that you assert that keeping women "on tighter leashes" and legalizing brothels would make the suicide rate drop, which you STILL do not provide a citation for.