There's as much evidence that Wotan and Lord Krishna exist as there is that Yahweh exists

The Yahweh case: "Does this inconsistent, self-contradicting article constitute valid evidence? " 1)"inconsistent, self-contradicting" This is a pure assertion which is rejected by 2.1 billion Christians in the world (about (one third of the total population of the planet). I advise you to show me one contradiction, the ultimate or the biggest contradiction there is. If this contradiction is untrue then how likely is it that all your "contradictions" are also pure assertions? 2)"article" That's an incorrect word. The Bible is a collection of books (Written over a period of 1500 years,over 40 generations,over 40 authors from many walks of life). Furthermore the Bible may contain the books of Apocrypha but since its only an addition I wont defend it. 3)A bible contradiction is not a mistranslation furthermore please do not add an extra contradiction even if the previous one is refuted. For convenience please use KJV. Moreover use common sense before you claim that something is a contradiction. The aim of this is to save time because after that one contradiction I have proved my point. Is Yahweh an evil,cruel and an unrighteous God: 1)Please provide references for me to refute (Preferably one because of the same reasons I've just provided). I only request that you don't make this an gratuitous evil argument. I recently had this argument and what you have presented so far has nothing to do with gratuitous evil therefore I think we can all agree that this argument is uncalled for. Is Yahweh hiding? 1)Your argument was one which requests explanation and the only way it works is if I cant give an explanation. 2)God has already spoken, and His words have been miraculously kept for us down through the ages. Now we have the full "Word". We need nothing more, and we are not to seek extra-biblical revelations. To do so calls into question the efficacy of Scripture which God has declared to be sufficient. 3)God does not give His people a continual chain of miraculous signs. He expects them to trust what He has already done, search the Scriptures daily, respond to the Holy Spirit within, and live by faith, not by sight (Matthew 16:4; John 20:29). When a Christian says "not by sight" he means that we're not to believe because there are no other options. 4)Let us remember that even in those times when it seems that God is doing nothing, He is still the sovereign Lord of all creation, and He is constantly at work, bringing about the fruition of His perfect plan. One of the best examples of God's "hidden" working is the book of Esther, in which God is never mentioned, but which plainly shows His sovereign hand at work from beginning to end. 5)Although miracles and God revealing himself may seem like an everyday event in the Bible, the truth is that in those days miracles seemed to be as rare as they are today. For example Jesus didn't perform a miracle until he was 30 and he stayed on earth for about 3 years and if one stretches the miracles of Jesus to 3 years, one can see that while it was an extraordinary time, miracles were not an everyday occurrence. Just pure assertion: "We should expect that a being capable of creating a universe and all of the infinite complexity of it, would be more enlightened than one of his creations. " Indeed you are brighter than God and a third of worlds population (me included). My Evidence: 1. The Resurrection One:To begin with, we have demonstrably sincere eyewitness testimony. Early Christian apologists cited hundreds of eyewitnesses, some of whom documented their own alleged experiences. Many of these eyewitnesses willfully and resolutely endured prolonged torture and death rather than repudiate their testimony(In some cases the same was with their family). This fact attests to their sincerity, ruling out deception on their part. According to the historical record (The Book of Acts 4:1-17; Pliny's Letters to Trajan X, 96, etc) most Christians could end their suffering simply by renouncing the faith. Instead, it seems that most opted to endure the suffering and proclaim Christ's resurrection unto death. Please remember they knew and not believed whatever or not Jesus resurrected. Two:Jesus was publicly executed and buried in Jerusalem. It would have been impossible for faith in His resurrection to take root in Jerusalem while His body was still in the tomb where the Sanhedrin could exhume it, put it on public display, and thereby expose the hoax. Instead, the Sanhedrin accused the disciples of stealing the body, apparently in an effort to explain its disappearance (and therefore an empty tomb). Three:Another evidence is the first generation of Christians were absolutely brutalized, especially following the conflagration in Rome in A. D. 64 (a fire which Nero allegedly ordered to make room for the expansion of his palace, but which he blamed on the Christians in Rome in an effort to exculpate himself). As the Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus recounted in his Annals of Imperial Rome (published just a generation after the fire) in The Annal, XV, 44 Four:Four:For the sake of space Ill say that I also approve the first five points made by the Bible-Defender in the first round:. http://www.debate.org...... My opponent must prove to me that there's as much evidence for Wotan and Lord Krishna as there is for Jesus. I advise my opponent to deal with the resurrection first because if not dealt properly I win even if hypothetically your arguments are correct.