Cloning human is unethical and unjust.

If I decide to clone a hand, it matches the definition of human cloning. If I decide to clone a foot, it matches the definition of human cloning. If I decide to clone a torso, a heart, two lungs, and a liver, it matches the definition of human cloning. Human cloning does not have to be the whole human, and I propose that the only type of cloning to be banned, is the cloning of the human brain. " Yes, that's true, but now don't we still have the copy an entire identical human part? Are they? I believe so. You can find tons of reasons why should people clone another human being, maybe for military practice, medication testing. .. , we take for granted and can be very excessive. It's human nature, once you get the law to help you with something, you'll want more and more. "Now, ask yourselves this: How would unthinking piles of meat be unjustly enslaved, or fight a Civil War? Who would want to liberate unthinking piles of meat? What type of person would adopt an unthinking pile of meat to raise? And is a clone of a hand a human that derserves rights? Is a single cloned liver a human that deserves rights? " _ Very good and fierce argument, but a thinkable human being can indeed make a Civil War, and since human can have the right to clone another fellow human being, it actually can happens in reality. "Even if we grow all the body parts of a human in a laboratory, with the sole exception of the central nervous system, it would cease to fulfill any ethical definition of "human". Thus, there is no immorality, no ethical problem. " _Well, since we're talking about create an identical human being which mean it will provides a fully grown hearts, lungs, kidney, brain. .. , I believe that creature is indeed can be called "human". "1. Human body parts can be cloned in order to replace parts that have been damaged or mutilated. 2. Organ systems cloned in large numbers can be used for drug testing. 3. Replicating human body parts allows for great leaps in the sciences of biotechnology; augmenting the human body with technology. " _Don't we forget the risk of cloning actual living human being, that will increase the risk of: 1. Plague another Civil War or Discrimination war right in this world. 2. Unjust and unethical usage of the living human clones for lab mouse, military use. .. 3. Take away the chances of the little kids in the orphanage when couples who can't conceive children can easily apply for a clone kids that they like. "#1- I stated specifically that human BODY PARTS can be cloned, I never said that an entire human ever be cloned. " -Yes, absolutely correct, but it does not prevent a higher risk that humanity will snatch this opportunity to clone actuaal human being, the fact that human can be able to clone a sheep foretell that we can also clone another human(fully living) as well. "#2- I stated that organ SYSTEMS can be cloned, never all the organ systems at once. " _Yes, but it does not oppose the fact that organ systems at once can be cloned for several reasons. "#2- I stated that organ SYSTEMS can be cloned, never all the organ systems at once. " _But we still can clone human, right? "All of these points are valid and they still stand. My opponent has argued that these three points be negligible because the cloning of COMPLETE human beings would yield a number of ethical dilemmas. All ethical dilemmas he proposed have now vanished, since we are not talking about cloning entire human beings, but about cloning individual parts that have no consciousness or personality. My opponent should provide arguments why human cloning is unethical even if we do not clone the human brain or central nervous system. " Well my friend, human cloning as you stated has this little definition: ""Human cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human being. .. ", as a human being can be defined as a "person", when we say a "person", it's a statement that point at a living species. If we are talking about human cloning, then it also included cloning a copy of human being, which you cannot deny, and indeed you'll need to also argue about that point of the stand, the fully definition, not just part of the definition. Thank you and I'm waiting for my opponent new argument.