There is a god

Again, CITATIONS NEEDED! But anyway, let me breakdown your comments... Quote - "Premise 1 " Something exists Premise 2 " Nothing cannot create something Conclusion " Something must have always existed There are only two options if we"re following the logic given in the cosmological argument. -Either the universe has always existed or -Something outside the universe has always existed" You are clearly not understanding that the universe is much more complicated then that. Even though I'm no expert on quantum physics, I can assure you that things don't always create other things. Even though scientists don't absolutely "know" how the universe was created, labelling it as divine is the last thing we want to do. Did you know, that islander tribes on some pacific islands witnessed WW2 planes fly on their islands and make bases out of them. After the planes left, they made stories about these "Gods" and even worshiped idols in the form of airplanes! It's called "Cargo Cult" - Check it out: https://en.m.wikipedia.org... My point is that simply because something is strange or unexplained, doesn't mean that "God did it" Anyway, there are some popular theories related to the creation of matter at the beginning of everything. http://www.pbs.org... https://www.cfa.harvard.edu... https://www.cfa.harvard.edu... Now for your point about evolution: "Advances in molecular biology have revealed vast amounts of information encoded in each and every living cell, and molecular biologists have discovered thousands upon thousands of exquisitely designed machines at the molecular level. Information requires intelligence and design requires a designer. -Biochemists and mathematicians have calculated the odds against life arising from non-life naturally via unintelligent processes. The odds are astronomical. In fact, scientists aren't even sure if life could have evolved naturally via unintelligent processes. If life did not arise by chance, how did it arise?" Sorry to bust your bubble, but Abiogenesis (beginning of evolution) didn't actually happen by random process - not fully anyway. In fact, "Abiogenesis was a long process with many small incremental steps, all governed by the non-random forces of Natural Selection and chemistry. The very first stages of abiogenesis were no more than simple self-replicating molecules, which might hardly have been called alive at all." Furthermore, "...the simplest theorized self-replicating peptide is only 32 amino acids long. The probability of it forming randomly, in sequential trials, is approximately 1 in [10^40], which is much more likely than the 1 in [10^390] claim creationists often cite." (The probability of life, written by Richard Peacock, accessed at http://evolutionfaq.com...). If life came by COMPLETE chance, then yeah, your right. But the fact is it didn't (as stated above). Finally - "People of every race, creed, color, and culture, both men and women, young and old, wise and foolish, from the educated to the ignorant, claim to have personally experienced something of the supernatural. So what are we supposed to do with these prodigious accounts of divine healing, prophetic revelation, answered prayer, and other miraculous phenomena? Ignorance and imagination may have played a part to be sure, but is there something more?" That is a HUGE overstatement, gross generalisation, and is show a LOT of fallacies such as: 1. Anecdotal fallacy (you give no source of this information) 2. An appeal to probability fallacy (you assume that your word is fact due to it being probable...to you anyway) 3. False Authority (your using only your unbelievable opinions) 4. Incomplete Comparison (you don't give any information to compare) And probably a lot more.