Abortion in the embryonic period should be legal

I thank Con for their reply.Con attempts to present arguments to justify that woman should be forced to continue pregnancy but how did they do ?Prevention/potentially of self-aware intelligent life does not justify forced continuation of pregnancyCon points out that allowing abortion in the early stages of pregnancy stops a potential of a self aware, intelligent human existing later on. Obviously this is true, but Con never made any CLEAR argument that this justifies forced continuation of pregnancy in the embryonic state.Also I think this line of justification is untenable, consider all the men & woman who use contraception, also consider the men and woman who refrain from having sexual intercourse. Such acts and non acts are all stopping a potential self aware, intelligent human existing later on, yet no one seriously believes therefore we are justified to force people to perform sexual intercourse whether they like it or not.Likewise we are not justified to force a woman to continue with a pregnancy in the embryonic period on such a justification.Actuality vs PotentialityCon does make the point that the human organism in the early states neither feels or is self ware, but later on (maybe) something will exist that will.This once again conflates actuality with potentiality and leads to absurdity. Con later on even admits a person doesn't exist yet, thus to talk about killing or even murdering a non existent person is nonsensical.Cons The murder argumentAs pointed out before Con does seem to agree that killing/murdering a non existent person is non sense yet they claim..."It is murder on life itself."I think this is a categorical error ? Con has claimed murder/killing of a concept, like killing the number 2, again it's non sense.Con also alludes to various killing of life, but this doesn't justify the forced continuation of pregnancy of a woman against her will.The right to life as an absolute is untenableThe right to life, that is to say say the right not to be killed is often invoked as justification for not allowing abortion. Notice those who advocate it don't really believe it them self at least not as an absolute, the most common view where intentional killing is justified is self defense (or some variation of). Then we have issues of drone strikes, war, dropping the A bomb, etc etc.The point is, not even the pro-life-anti choicer believes in such a simplistic absolute right to life and to selectively apply it in the case of women & abortion is a double standard and hypocritical.Freedom not restricted unless justifiedI take it Con agrees here. Bodily rights argument (the violinist analogy)Con doesn't dispute you can unplug and I maintain you can't force an act (eg forced continuation of pregnancy/forced sexual intercourse) just because a self aware, intelligent life won't exist in the future unless such an act is forced.Pregnant Women vs Billionaires (Dis-proportionality argument)Recall how I pointed out..."here is the logical point, if rights and freedoms are such that we can't force the billionaires of the world to give up all their wealth except a few millions to save thinking, feeling, self aware humans, then it would be laughable to then argue that we are justified to force women to give up more, their bodily rights and the dangers of pregnancy in order to save non thinking, non feeling, non self aware, human embryos."I think the point stands.Human 3 day is not morally equivalent to a human 5 year old childCon does seem to agree they are not equal, and the relevant morally factors at play include, self awareness, intelligence, ability to feel pain.If abortion is murder (reducto argument)Con didn't seem to dispute that if we assume that abortion is murder in the embryonic period it leads to absurdity, thus we are justified to reject the premise as false in the first place.Personhood & the right to lifeCon didn't seem to dispute that only persons have a right to life, and seems to agree that no such person exists in the embryonic period.The argument stands.I look forward to Cons reply.