Interactive Drawing Cartoon Contest.

Draw:-a scientist wearing a lab coat (keep in mind that a scientist is defined as "an expert in science"http://dictionary.reference.com..., and "Science", having many definitions, one of them is "systematized knowledge in general". So technically it could be a connoisseur in any topic. Mind blow, eh?- " A Wedge of Cheese" Wedge: a piece of anything of like shape. Cheese: the curd of milk separated from the whey and prepared in many ways as a food, BUT HERE'S THE CATCH: IT'S ALSO A PLANT. Mind blowing, eh? (see: http://en.wikipedia.org...)And now, I add upon....wait, I haven't added my drawing yet? Perfect, more suspense! And to guarantee my win in this round, I will add reason to support the drawing. 1. My drawing is more complex than my opponent's It has a person and a gigantic "Wedge of cheese", while my opponent simple has a person.2. my drawing's person has more complex emotion than my opponent'sWhile my opponent simply has a very sly scientist, my scientist is very conflicted and confused concerning his creation: should he throw the "Bad cheese" away? Or should he conclude his results satisfactory? This conflict within my scientist is unseen in my opponent's, and thus, my drawing is more enigmatic and complex on a whole new level.3. my drawing is complex on not one, not two, but FIVE levels.The two complex levels are seen above.THREE: anybody notice the scientist is presented in a 2-D format while the cheese is 3-D?? This creates a whole new perspective and mind-blow to anyone. Did the scientist create the miracle working of a 3-D object in a 2-D world? Or maybe it's a 3-D world and the scientist has successfully transformed himself into a 2-D form but now doesn't know what to do. FOUR: The cheese is colored in strangely. This makes my drawing better than my opponent's because he did not color his drawing in. However, this makes the drawing only more complex--Not only did my scientist create this gigantic (not to mention 3-D) "Wedge of cheese", he also made it strange colors! This truly highlights the cryptic nature of my drawing in contrast to the easy-to-understand sly professor.FIVE: A closer examination makes the drawing feel....ultra weird. Because although at first it may seem my scientist is looking at the cheese, if you draw a straight line, it seems that the scientist is staring at my signature....Could the cheese be talking?!! Nothing reveals this, but the holes in the swiss cheese seem very suspicious, and combined with the fact that it's gigantic, filled with odd colors, and a 3-D shape in contrast to the professor, anthing is possible! In conclusion my drawing is much better than my opponent's. Although it might not look that much better artistic wise, it is far more puzzling and complex on five different levels, an impressive feat for a mere high-schooler who is still learning to draw.Now, what shall you draw next round combined with the "scientist" wearing a lab coat and the "wedge of cheese"?HMMM.....Aha!You shall draw....a fluorescent light. I define "flourescent" as "strikingly bright, vivid, or glowing" from http://dictionary.reference.com.... So it could be the sun, a lightbulb, a glint of the eye, or anything else! This is very flexible, and I really want to be able to have different drawings. Seriously, you even said "DRAWINGS SHOULD BE DRAWN UNIQUELY EACH TIME*". So this helps both me and you.Good luck pro! And I hope your next drawing is much more enigmatic!