BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Ronald McDonalds vs. Burger King

Ronald said i was milk, lets not get this picture blurry I can't understand you...you garglin' on your mcflurry I'm haughty, so all because of that, i'm soggy? You ain't progressed, lil Mcburgers all foggy (1) You started from the bottom then your degree in college Got your dream job makin' this overrated Mcgarbage! (2) How you gon' tell me what's wrong? When this don't look right! Even clowns don't find this funny, now that's dat crap i don't like! Allow me to admit, yes i confess to the crime, i am a robber But you stealin' wages cuz that's the only time you go ham burglar! (3) We can go on and on Ronald about the healthiest food in a ballad (19) We can't talk man to man, cuz you keep tossin' Wendy's salad (4) After this battle, we all will watch you n' your business pack I came here to drop a bomb on you, give me my menu back! Look at you rap?!? You misread the letter, look at you wrap! Ronald miscounted his bets, allow me to give him half back! Allow me to open a letter from tall stores to sever the bond wars! Then i get the chains to fetter ya scum corps n' bring you on all fours! With ya cash, knit myself a sweater, raw sports as i litter the time scores! Move the food debtor past ports cuz my burgers are better than all yours! (5) My backhand flipped your girl over like a pancake on my special salad plate At BK's breakfast, we're on the wait, i asked "want some fries with that shake?" Your girl said "please Burger King! let me touch your gold, it shines bright in spring!" I said "Nah bimbo, before you touch my bling, you have to first kiss my onion ring" When i ride through these streets, all hail me as King and praise my richness! 50 Cent drops my name in his beats (6) Even G's respect me cuz i'm ambitious! Don't try n' grill wit' me, i'll burn ya meats, i'm the hottest in hell's own kitchen! Feedin' the needy with these sheets of aluminum cuz i have a noble mission! Sources 1. 2. http://www.uflx.tv... 3. http://www.huffingtonpost.com... 4. http://www.cnbc.com...#. 5. http://healthyeating.sfgate.com... 6. "If I ain't rap 'cause I flipped burgers at Burger King" 21 questions http://rap.genius.com...
Ronald McDonalds vs. Burger King

Admit it readers, Burger King's a pee-er of warm white stuff called milk His French fries look like strips of spider-spun salted, non salubrious silk! The Proud Whopper is so gung-ho, cocky n haughty that he became soggy That was quite naughty but the King just sits and grins saying nothing bossy At least in my restaurant I take control over the bad deeds bein done Somebody steals, I wail until the security guards come n takes em You say have it your way and let people rob you, the food's underdone [2] Burger King, I'm your boss and here's the truth: you look like an evil bum LeBron James is replacing the Burger King so limit your purchase to 3 quarter pound hamburger The reason for this is cuz the 4th quarter never shows up! The current "king" s a recipe burglar [1] Robin Williams passed 'way and your fast fued restaurant brought back chicken fries It's bittersweet symphony but it doesn't look like your going to let out any sad cries! Your all new bacon sundae sounds utterly disgusting, the loners are da onlyuns who try [3] The TV tells the customers dat your better than me but da advertisement is such a lie! You pledge to take a huge step in the direction of healthier nutrition I'm not mistaken how you gon lock the doors as a chosen solution BK is not only a robber of our treats, but also a hacker of the MD treats We sell healthy veggie burritos and you sell yucky processed meats! You should be ashamed of your hair style That was so last generation, ya bulldog smile I'll beat the bile out of you, crazy franchise maker My buildings are real worldwide, yours are faker You think I never learned spelling well look at me rap! To me and all the business I make ya better tip yo cap! Just hand all your cafes to me, along with your money Im taking over all fast food restaurants, you a patsy! [1] http://www.salon.com... [2] [3] sorry for the language but it's hilarious:
Ronald McDonalds vs. Burger King

Ronald, i can't understand how you earn profits and the highest bids When you are a registered sex offender who molests the little kids I mean the only meal that makes you happy are the money budgets You needed a makeover and finished feeling on your mcnuggets You hide your face because it's ugly with or without make-up Your a joke when you look in ya mirror, that's why ya'll broke up My sandwiches don't appear kingly to the lowly peasants Using Ronald for my personal footstool in his mom's presence Old Mcdonald had a farm and since your birth, it was your dwelling Reason you have that retarded smile is cuz you never learned spelling You never made millions so you advertise broke and homeless Like a prostitute begging in the streets, your so poor and hopeless I stole your girl (1) you were so busy, you ain't know she had a big mac! I fed her my triple whopper last night and she was just lovin' dat! Your food is so trash, my whopper junior gives you a quarter pounder Toss you over like beef patties on the grill, i'm cookin' Flounder I'm the king burning over a hundred fifty degrees, you can't stand the heat Your cheesy burgers aren't concrete so dump them all in the potty seat Ridin' dirty in the back seat to BK so me and all my homies can eat Diss my crown, well your dad's gamete made you a mystery meat I'm dissin' this clown til his smile falls to a frown as he falls to the ground! I'm a world renown king of fast food, a royal noun in da cape town! Ronald's just foolin' around, time to put him down and reclaim my crown! 1.
Christians should not observe the Sabbath on Sunday.

Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy. For six days you shall labour and do all your work. But the seventh day is a Sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any work—you, your son or your daughter, your male or female slave, your livestock, or the alien resident in your towns. For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but rested the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and consecrated it. Exodus 20: 8-11 The Fourth Commandment. Among more observant Jews, this practice is continued to this day. Meanwhile, for some reason, Christians (which seem to acknowledge indisputably the other nine commandments) ignore it, believing it no longer theologically viable or that the day of the Resurrection has somehow taken precedence over the eternal sanctification of the Sabbath. There were many fundamentals among the Judaic religion before Christ's time. Although it is generally perceived in the Christian community that many of the 603 ordinances were part of a setting-specific legal code that is malleable enough not to be continued in today's society, the 10 Commandments were written on STONE and placed inside the MIDDLE of the Ark, wherars the ordinances were written on PAPER and placed at the SIDE, signifying they were not as important as the stone tablets. Now, when Christ came to this world to fulfil His Mission, He manifested a fresher bout of theological thought and made fulfilled many parts of the Law, namely replacing the sacrificial system with Himself, but explicitly recorded such amendments. If he were to take one of the oldest and most directly explained fundamentals of the Church, and replace it with a Sunday sabbath or none at all, would one not assume He would have clarified more than the vague scriptures used by opponents of the Sabbath? Rather if one is to study Church history one realises that the Early Church did congregate mainly on the Sabbath, and kept it as Christ had. It was only when Constantine tried to bring politics into the Church by appeasing Sunday-congregating pagans that it became common practice. Looking back, is not a more sound theological descison to respect the Word of God (the 10 C's were the only thing actually written by God in the Bible) rather than a human tradition established by Constantine for his own political reasons?
The western world is corrupt.

Hello! I haven't debated in a year, so consider me a bit rusty.My statement is as follows: The western world as we know it is corrupt and run by corporate companies for the benefit of the rich and to the detriment of the majority of the world population.Notable definitions:The Western World: Countries generally considered developped countries. This includes countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, France, Spain etc. (Although may not include exceptions such as certain nordic countries).Corrupt: The government acts in favor of the rich and in detriment to the poor.Warning: by saying that the western world is corrupt I am in no way saying that the rest of the world isn't.Rules:Keep calm and kind, anger or insults don't win debates.Forfeiture of a round means forfeiture of the debate.Please keep to the structure.Debate structure:Round 1 - AcceptanceRound 2 - Opening argumentsRound 3 - RebuttalsRound 4 - Further rebuttals and conclusion
Atheist have no Morals

Um, thanks for those... small thoughts Anyway, as I see your point about how Athietism is the disbelieve in God, not the acceptance in morals. But there are also a lot of things that don't change in definition just because of one thing. To say "humans have a brains", does not change the definition of "human" the definition of human is still a "human being, especially a person as distinguished from an animal or (in science fiction) an alien". Claiming humans have brains doesn't change the definition to "a human being, especially a person as distinguished from an animal or (in science fiction) an alien. P.s, they have brains" It is just simply a fact that we have come to know. Saying a room has a bed in it doesn't change the definition of "room" . The definition of room is still "a part or division of a building enclosed by walls, floor, and ceiling." Do some Atheist kill people for the wrong reason? Yes, but that isn't the majority. It its said that out of the 10% population of American Atheist, only 0.254% are in prison. http://www.patheos.com... Now what does this prove? That at least a majority of Atheist, in the States at least, have a moral base, or that percentage in jail would be much, much higher. Now that other 99.746% are mostly religions , these so called, moral leaders in the world. We like to say that because you belive in a God, you have morals. But then how come this large population is religious? Just to clarify, not all of these people in jail did things that were necessarily immoral, but they still broke that law, which I would say, would still be frowned upon by their church, synagogue, etc. Another thing is that I never said everyone signal Atheist had morals, I was contradicting the statement that absolutely no Atheist have morals, which is belive in some Christains eyes.
Atheist have no Morals

Well, I'm an atheist as well and I have been spending days on debate.org rejecting claims of gods, defending how morals don't need a god, and demonstrating immoralities of common religions. That said, Atheists as a group don't have any prescriptive morals unique to atheism. The reason is that atheism is simply the rejection of a god, not an acceptance of morals. I am an atheist and I'm moral, but those two qualities are mutually exclusive. I'm not claiming atheists can't be moral, I'm claiming that rejecting a god is neither rejecting or accepting morals; the rejection of a god has no morals (I'm not saying it is immoral). Since atheism only answers the question of what you believe, it doesn't answer the question of what you think is morally correct. Every atheist is different, and they all believe different things, including what is morally right and wrong. The only thing they share is the disbelief of a god/gods, which provides no set of morals, not because they are rejecting god, but because accepting morals is a different activity than believing in a deity. To claim that atheists as a whole have morals, is to change the definition of atheism to mean more than lack of a belief in god. People who don't collect baseball cards have morals. This should seem like a non sequitur, because collecting baseball cards answers the question of whether or not you collect, not whether or not you have morals. Sure, some people who don't collect baseball cards have morals, but it isn't the fact that they don't collect baseball cards that makes them moral. So please demonstrate to me that rejecting the god claim results in having morals. I also believe that even though I'm the pro in this debate, the burden of proof is on you, because I'm rejecting the claim that atheists have morals. You need to demonstrate that they do as a result of not believing.
Atheist have no Morals

You say, "Claiming humans have brains doesn't change the definition to "a human being, especially a person as distinguished from an animal or (in science fiction) an alien. P.s, they have brains" Your analogies seem incoherent and unrelated, but if I may paraphrase...you're saying that the definition of human requires that they have a brain so mentioning it post script is redundant? I don't understand the analogy. Are you saying that the definition of atheist requires morals therefore mentioning it post script is redundant? Please clarify. Then out of left field you say "It its said that out of the 10% population of American Atheist, only 0.254% are in prison." Great, except for the fact that this number, though I would like to brag about it, is deflated. So many inmates wish to show their releasers that they've changed, or turned a new leaf, and a very convincing argument is that they've devoted themselves to doing the good, or god's work. So it may be that more than .254% of atheists go into prison and convert to a religion for a better prospect of freedom, thus the number is affected. Again I hate to defend the religious, but there are so many religious people, that their numbers of immoral people are inflated. Like in China, 99% of inmates are of Chinese origin. Are Chinese less moral than the other racial populations in China? No, there's just so many Chinese, that it follows there are so many Chinese inmates. Again, atheists have no moral set. Yes, it could be that atheists are largely aware of morals, because they are constantly attacked by the religious for not having god as a moral compass, but alas there is no atheistic moral. There is a belief or non belief in god, and there are things that are moral or immoral. Please demonstrate that there are morals specific to atheism, and refrain from trying to prove religions to be immoral. By proving religions to be immoral, you do not prove atheism has morals.
Irrational debate of many layers (Experimental debate)

Interesting argument, Con. Yet I feel like you missed an important part of the story. http://111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.com... As we can see here, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sailor Moon are the same person. Sailor Moon has travelled through time several times before (and that would also explain why you can see in this picture a total amount of 5 Arnold Sailormooneggers). They all look different in some sense because they are from different dimensions and travelled to the same point in space-time. This is a proof of the multiverse. Now, how does this fit in my arguments? It is commonly known that Jesus could do some amazing things, such as curing sick people. Now, did they have the technology to cure people 2000 years ago? No. Just as you said before, Jesus has no superpowers because God does not exist. So where did this "power" come from? It must have come from somewhere. It came from another dimension 1.- Now, considering that Arnold can travel through dimensions and time. We can assume that there are infinitely different dimensions. In some of them we have a heterosexual George Michael. In others, Jesus has superpowers. Con"s logic has proved that at least in our universe, God does not exist. But he didn"t disprove his existence in the rest of infinite universes, since in some of them George Michael is not gay, as you can deduce from pure logic. But still the question remains unanswered: Could Jesus microwave the burrito that hot? Now, in this picture we have proof that at least in 5 different dimensions we have 5 time-travellers that would come to our universe (All of them would be Arnold). Arnold is catholic, and thus Christian. In other dimensions, Jesus has superpowers and Christianity develops in a similar way to our Christianity. So at least one of these dimension-travellers must be Christian. Now, if Jesus had no superpowers, then there would be no Christianity since he actually got followers because of his "superpowers". Where did this "superpowers" come from? Not from our dimension, we know that. One of these Arnold"s travelled back to Jesus and gave him the technology to make these miracles thus making Christianity appear in our universe too. Now Jesus didn"t get these superpowers from our god, but from Arnold Sailormoonegger, who probably got his dimension-travelling superpower from a God in another dimension. But why would our dear Arnold do such a thing? The reason has always been in front of our eyes: "Because Washington is Hollywood for ugly people." The logic we have developed in our universe has not yet found an explanation to this reason, but these words came from the very same document where you can see the 5 dimension-travellers. Investigators suspect that the dimension traveller is Christian. But we have only theories so far. I suggest looking at this link: http://www.youtube.com...
Irrational debate of many layers (Experimental debate)

Following my proposal in http://www.debate.org... This debate is meant to push the boundaries of classical debating. The fun of this debate is to give a totally unrelated source (one link per turn) to the opponent and make him use this information to use as convincing as possible. I propose talking about "Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot that he Himself could not eat it?" The opponent must use this link as the only source of justification: http://youtu.be... Con must defend his point and give another link.
That Christian Theism is reasonable

Upon a reasonable perspective, let"s start with God himself. God can be all powerful, all seeing, and all loving. But He is not a trinity, that is a miscinstructed idea by the Catholic Church that can easily be disproven by the Bible itself. For example, when God speaks with his son Jesus and the Holy Spirit represented as a Dove, each separate. Second, He is not everywhere at once. Reasonably, if He is all powerful, He can go anywhere without trouble and being everywhere at once doesn"t add any substance. He can see all, even thoughts, He has no point to be everywhere, so He resides in the spiritual Heavens As well, Being all knowing doesn"t require you to be at that certain location. So, God is all powerful, all knowing, all loving, and He is a celestial being above the laws of the universe. This is the God I support and is supported by the Bible. So, what may be your contradictions that I should answer?
That Christian Theism is reasonable

First debate on this website for myself so have restricted the character count to 1000 to prevent large essays from forming. Definition Reasonable means to be valid, sound, and to be more probable than its (mathematical) conjugate Christian Theism means an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, morally perfect, Trinitarian, immaterial, dimensionless and personal entity that has acted in the universe to fulfill a soverign purpose as described through the Christian tradition I am trying to test some arguments out so will try to keep the debate fairly short as well Of course all proper ettiquette is expected I am of the con position that the Christian God is not reasonable for several reasons relating to internal contradictions regarding his character and necessary contradictions that follow from his existence. I further argue that materialism is more reasonable than its opposite and therefore the belief in the Christian God is not reasonable. Thanks you
That Christian Theism is reasonable

1. Acceptance by many does not equal truth. The Bible itself provides evidence refuting the existence of the trinity. Therefore, if the trinity does not exist, it is not a contradiction, since it is untrue. 2. I provided an example of the similarities between human and the Holy Justice of God. We humans know we shouldn"t condemn people solely based on definitions. Rather, we have a Supreme Court and use juries. We also have attorneys and lawyers. My case is that the mind of God is greater, He sees all, knows all, and has the perfect wisdom, making His judgements of justice superior. Look in the Bible and God always has a reasonable argument for His every action. 3. Concepts and ideas can not be felt. Yet they are liable to change. Although you never extacly state what of God goes into stasis, He doesn"t need to change. For one, He is no human, He is a celestial being.
That Christian Theism is reasonable

1. The crucifixion narrative is not really dependant on specific details regarding if it was a cross or stake that is trivial but rather that he was executed as part of a ritual to take the sins of others. Further there has been no argument that the trinity itself is not a well attested doctrine of Christian theology while I presented the evidence that the vast majority of Christian denominations subscribe to that doctrine as a core tenet. 2. A case of special pleading that just cause a doctrine is said to be holy does not allow it to remain contradictory 3. Pretty complicated but for an example recall that speed is just distance over time. In this sense all change can be conceived as a change in dimension A over dimension B but in a dimensionless immaterial plane there exists no dimensions upon which to induce a change therefore an immaterial being either has to operate under different logical parameters or else cannot change and therefore remains in stasis.
That Christian Theism is reasonable

1. The trinity is not supported by the Bible. In many verse, God and Jesus are stated as individual people. The crusifixion is false in itself. One, when the Bible was written in its ancient language, the word describing what Jesus was hung on could be translated to "stake" or "post". Mentions of a cross were not described in earlier languages. 2. Human justice and Holy justice vary. Human justice is ineffective. Just by definition, a man who murdered would be sentenced to life, but a man who killed a robber in self defense technically would still have murdered and should be sentenced to life. Therefore, mercy and reasoning acts as the means to distinguish what right actions should be carried. Alone, justice can not stand as one. Therefore, mercy and wisdom are needed. Jesus died with no lasting repercussions, it was just a representation of how perfect beings can still be obedient to God 3.Stasis in which manner? God is already perfect, how much more can He become. That is a theory
That Christian Theism is reasonable

Arguments 1. Trinity contradiction from Unitarianism G=F, G=S, G=H S=F=H But in Christian tradition S=/=F=/=H The Christian God is necessarily a trinity as that is crucial to the crucifixion narrative. Secondly it is a widely held doctrine by about 47 of 50 denominations. See . https://www.quora.com... 2. Justice Versus Mercy Justice by definition gives those what they deserve In accordance with the crucifixion Justice is suspended by allocation of punishment to another non guilty entity and then forgiveness to others a mercy of sorts Clearly mercy is in violation of Justice requirement of a Morally Perfect being 3. Dimensionless problem In absence of dimensions in the immaterial no change can ever occur since change is always defined as a rate thus God is in stasis