Young people do not have good arguments.

you easily prove my case here (1) Do you have a masters or PhD? Are you arguing the facts? Personally I think the amount of formal education under your belt is rather moot. I know some people without such degrees who are more than apt when it comes to a number of subjects, even youths. So you insult me, although I have a BS from Berkeley in Chemical Engineering and a MS in Mechanical and Chemical Engineering from UH Manoa. You are both ingorant and jealous, it sounds to me, and you will see how your ingorance is obvious when you try and answer even basic questions of science that I have asked you - VERY BASIC ONES Ok I go on >>You say I lost the debates on hydrogen and Collidal silver and other science topics simply based on BS "votes" from novices with NO CLUE what they are talking about I say you lost the debate because you're wrong Collidal silver doesn't heal anything and nobody has shown it has any benefits at all. The FDA does not allow advertising of the product because there are no scientific reasons to accept any of the claims made about it. Not only is it not a cure for everything under the sun, it's dangerous WRONG WRONG WRONG here are several references, but I dont think you can read, so you will continue to be a pawn of the guvmint. http://en.wikipedia.org... Prior to 1938, colloidal silver was widely used by physicians as a mainstream antibiotic.[1] It was produced by pharmaceutical companies under various names, including Protargol. Silver nitrate solutions were introduced by Credï¿½ in 1880 to protect newborn infants' eyes from infection.[2], Concentrations of colloidal silver at 5 parts per million or higher have been found to kill numerous infectious bacteria.[6] Colloidal silver has been approved by the EPA as a disinfectant for hospitals and medical centers.[7] Heres a technical paper that you arent intelligent enough to read, but maybe someone else will want to learn something http://aem.asm.org... Ok , NEXT Hydrogen is a good fuel, just not for cars. Ok Expert Then Why are the germans (BMW) producing and leasing them ? http://www.msnbc.msn.com... Why is the world turing to hydrogen and the feds spending billions on it? And aircraft ? no problem. http://flug-revue.rotor.com... Space Shuttle ? no problem - its the only fuel that can get us into space because of its high energy density ( 4 times that of JP-4) http://en.wikipedia.org... And your solution ? 2008 should bring around plug in hybrids and from there it's a gradual transition to electric. Sorry , but youre never going to see battery powered cars only. The range is too low and the charge times too long. You need a fuel and a motor EtOH is a unmitigated DISASTER Biofuels are a curosity at best and inferior fuels, and problematic there is NO OTHER ANSWER. WE ARE WASTING TIME DOING THE WRONG THINGS Hopefully there will be less ignorant people than you who will get it. -----------Now more of your brilliance----------- A fuel cell is basically an easy and highly efficient way of burning hydrogen WRONG. it doesnt burn anything. here is a fuel cell primer http://inventors.about.com... Fuel cells are good for stationary power, bypassing the carnot efficiency More of your brilliance >>what is the carnot efficiency? Usually pretty high less than unity, it doesn't generally exist but the calculation is pretty useful for comparing the calculation of the efficiency of the idealized Carnot cycle to what your actual heat engine is producing. Somehow I have a striking suspicion you think there are Carnot engines all over the place like PMM floating in the ether of out there. DUH! you sooooooooooo prove exactly what Im talking about Im not going to explain the Carnot efficiency- you are unable to understand (it is Th-Tc/ Th ) NEXT FOOLISHNESS FROM YOU >>how do you calculate combsution efficiency? Same way you calculate any efficiency. Work done / Energy used. fairly close, Ill give you a pass >>what is the total energy needed for the transportation sector? With perfect efficiency very little. You should be able to be nudged and float where ever you intended to go. This damned atmosphere and friction filled ground makes that impossible though. So roughly zero. Glad YOURE not in charge of the energy sector Now you try and go back to the CS argument Here's a video of somebody who took Collidal silver and turned blue. BOOM! WHOOOP! BANG! KABOOM! -- You're owned. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha prove any of this BS show me PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES in SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS that give correlation between dose, PPM, duration, and degree of blemish. YOU CANT , becuase YOU DONT HAVE A CLUE WHAT YOURE TALKING ABOUT Now you switch to the Global Warming BS and show your ingorance and bias Hardly. Go ahead and read the IPCC report. The disagreeing scientists are generally a huge minority and all paid by the oil companies. Feel free to check the union of concerned scientists opinion of the topic of global warming. The core argument is sound. BS Here are the FACTS, and REAL SCIENTISTS FAR MORE QUALFIED that disagree Dont let them get in the way of your ignorance and bias http://en.wikipedia.org... To say that CO2 at 350 ppm is affecting climate is idiotic, especially when water vapor is 10000 ppm, which these "scientists" IGNORE in their "science", which is a much more important regulator of global temperature, BUT NOT TAXABLE BY THE NINNIES WHO ARE TRYING TO REGULATE AND TAX US WITH THIS NONSENSE here is the best case in point in all of history of ignorance of science among the general populus being expoited the democrats and socialists in order to control and tax us and regulate us into submission you BREATHE OUT CO2 every green plant on the earth USES CO2 as food every form of energy from fossil fuels makes CO2 fermentation makes CO2 this is a pollutant? NONSENSE and furthermore, the proponents like AL Gore the FOOL not only lie through their teeth about facts and have to be publicly corrected http://www.timesonline.co.uk... and then hysterically claim there are 600 THINGS that will happen as the earth warms slowly http://wolfpangloss.wordpress.com... HEY GENIUS! Whats more of a threat- COLD or WARM? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm? dont you think maybe, just maybe that something might be BETTER is the earth gets warmer? So (1) CO2 is NOT causing it, (2) it is very slow and (3) it probably is a good thing anyway , even though WE HAVE NO CONTROL over it This is the preeminent example of how liberals are FOOLED by their demoncat masters- they are told "its for the environment" or "its for the children" etc and they will BUY ANYTHING THEY ARE TOLD So you have MORE THAN PROVEN your ignorance, and your cockiness, despite your total ingorance, and thus have more than proven my point Young people do not have the experience and education to be able to rationally argue complex topics (in general) This is becuase of lack of education, cockiness and disregard for facts, and inability to see their own ignorance Your silly argument that YOU have posted COGENT arguments is laughable I laugh ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha SOLARMAN