Acts 21 proves that the Apostle Paul was a false teacher

Faith and belief are very different things, in scriptural and dictionary terms, however I shall stick with the scriptural definition of faith. Hebrews 11:1 11 Faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for, the evident demonstration of realities though not beheld. Notice that in scriptural terms faith is much, much more than belief. It is as good as a guarantee that you will get what is promised. Can you honestly say that the faith of those Jewish converts, and don't forget the Apostles were all Jews, was so strong if they felt you had to keep the law to gain salvation? I speak with many on the internet who have a belief in Christ, but very little real faith, in scriptural terms, and we are after all discussing scripture so we need to think in it's terms. Paul's viewpoint, as demonstrated in that scripture in Acts 21, as well as demonstrated by the Apostles and older men in their statement recorded at Acts 15, is very clearly carry out the matters of law or don't, it makes no difference, just don't think you will get saved by doing so. That is why Paul was content, as an ex-Jew, to do as he was told, since it made no difference to his future, but affected the consciences of other, as he explained in the 1 Corinthians letter I quoted previously. No, his sacrifice did not bring an end to "forever", however it did bring and end to the Law as a rigid Law code forever, because it was a once and for all time sacrifice and, as prophesied in Daniel 9 caused sacrifice and offering to cease. The destruction of the Temple was supposed to underline that fact, and make future sacrifice according to the law physically impossible. It also, by doing replacing the law, brought an end to the Mosaic Covenant. Again, as prophesied in Daniel 9:24 "There are seventy weeks that have been determined upon your people and upon your holy city, in order to terminate the transgression, and to finish off sin, and to make atonement for error, and to bring in righteousness for times indefinite, and to imprint a seal upon vision and prophet, and to anoint the Holy of Holies. 25 And you should know and have the insight [that] from the going forth of [the] word to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah [the] Leader, there will be seven weeks, also sixty-two weeks. She will return and be actually rebuilt, with a public square and moat, but in the straits of the times. 26 "And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah will be cut off, with nothing for himself. "And the city and the holy place the people of a leader that is coming will bring to their ruin. And the end of it will be by the flood. And until [the] end there will be war; what is decided upon is desolations. 27 "And he must keep [the] covenant in force for the many for one week; and at the half of the week he will cause sacrifice and gift offering to cease. I have read it many times, and no Paul was not teaching any message different to the other Apostles. He was, as were they, teaching the message that reliance on the Law for salvation was at an end and was brought to an end by Jesus' sacrifice. The whole thrust of his message was not against carrying out the things in the law, but about practising it, which is a very different thing, and the Jews were teaching that one had to obey the Law to be saved. The appropriate phrase is the last one in Acts 21: 21 But they have heard it rumored about you that you have been teaching all the Jews among the nations an apostasy from Moses, telling them neither to circumcise their children nor to walk in the customs. Whilst there was no harm or benefit in doing the things in the law, "walking in the customs" was the problem. Of course it also has to be remembered that we are here being told of a rumour, but was that rumour actually what Paul had said or was a a distorted version of it, put out by those Jews who taught that one had to obey the customs to be saved? We are not told. It is called rumour and could be just that and nothing more.