Rational_Thinker9119 is possibly the smartest debater on DDO

As said by your man Albert Einstein, "Creativity is intelligence having fun. " However, winning lots of troll debates does not mean you are extremely intelligent. It just means you are a very good troll. I was only pointing out that Rational Thinker was extremely versatile, not only good in normal debates, but also good at troll debates. . http://www.goodreads.com... "Albert Einstein once said "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough". Well, RT did "explain it simply" by saying "a conscious mind is the grounding of everything", which basically sums up all his complex arguments. As you can see he understands it well enough, based on Einstein's quote. High elo does not equal good debater--one great example is Mikal. He may have the highest elo in all of DDO, but even he submits to others as seen in this message to thett3: Hey, Mikal's the best person, he knows his own debating ability and limits, so he can be said a pretty credible source! "BananaPhilosopher beat him at his own game, fooling RT into taking a debate with a 5 minute argument time limit. " Although RT did ignore the fact that there was a 5 minute argument time limit, he could simply be unobservative. Unobservative does not automatically mean stupid. For example, a scientist in quantum study who is a genius in the fields, won tons of nobel peace prizes, and made loads of speech that made the crowd love him, and is voted by 99% of the world to be "smartest person on earth", he could one day simply be too concentrated on walking to his lab to do an experiment to notice that there was a mugging on the street within his peripheral vision. And how many times do I have to stress this: being an amazing debater does NOT mean being super smart. However, it does just means you have good support, or research, or logical reasoning, which are some level of smartness. I was only pointing out that RT was a good debater, better than many others, and he has these quality, which support him to some level of smartness. This was only a small addition to my other proof. As for higher level of sciences and philosphy, those are very arguable. RT mainly does debates about god's existence, The Kalam Cosmological Argument (whatever that is), and other debates. Even in the (serious) debates he lost, he provides lots and lots of information about the topic he provided and supports his side with loads of argument, making him incredibly hard to lose against. That's pretty smart of him, providing so much information and attempting to overload the opponent with too much information, even if he loses. One great example form the debate "A Maximally Great Being Exists In No Possible World": "P1: It is greater to be perfect than imperfectP2: If it is possible for a maximally great being to exist, this being is perfectP3: It is greater to be unlimited than limited. P4: If it is possible for a maximally great being to exist, this being is unlimited. P5: If it is possible for a maximally great being to exist, this being is perfect and unlimited. P6: If it is possible for a perfect being to exist, this being improves upon its greatness in no possible world. P7: If it is possible for an unlimited being to exist, this being improves upon its greatness in some possible world. P8: There cannot be both no possible world where a maximally great being improves upon its greatness, and some possible world where a maximally great being improves upon its greatness. P9: A maximally great being exists in no possible world. P10: A maximally great being does not exist in the actual world. "It can be seen because of the amount of knowledge RT knows that he is very knowledgable, and thus, very smart. (which supports my statement that RT is possibly the smartest debater on DDO.