BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
EPIC RAP BATTLES OF HISTORY Darth Vader VS Adolph Hitler BOTH 1 AND 2 OVERALL WINNER

So it seems everything has been dropped in this round with the exception of one obstacle. On the ERB website Vader has gotten more votes you say? -One, your site still doesn't show those numbers....I dispute the truthfullness of the argument -Two, even if they are true, it means that Vader, in a purely techincal sense, is winning in one survey, that doesn't prove your BOP
EPIC RAP BATTLES OF HISTORY Darth Vader VS Adolph Hitler BOTH 1 AND 2 OVERALL WINNER

Voting will never stop yes but we are using the present results not the past not the future the present http://epicrapbattlesofhistory.com... May I say the one opinion survey is the official website of ERB so I think Vader has won. - And now the second battle this time Yes Hitler did good but still with the votes comparison to the last fight the percentage difference is not to downhill for Vader than it did for Hitler in the first fight http://epicrapbattlesofhistory.com...
EPIC RAP BATTLES OF HISTORY Darth Vader VS Adolph Hitler BOTH 1 AND 2 OVERALL WINNER

Alright, so everything was dropped, and Pro introduced the following point " Which in epic rap battle of history.com says 64 percent of people voted for Vader in there first battles while only 36 percent went for Hitler" Voting is still in process. That is to say Vader is winning in just one survey that's being taken of the battle (btw can you link this, I couldn't find it. I suspect that you're lying), Vader has not WON just because he is doing better in one opinion survey.
EPIC RAP BATTLES OF HISTORY Darth Vader VS Adolph Hitler BOTH 1 AND 2 OVERALL WINNER

It is called EPIC for a reason the rap battles which were created for the sole purpose to use the characters accent costume to entertain and see who would rap better with the given rap lines Vader in the 1st battle proved to be to much given that Hitler did not answer due to being frozen via Carbonite bath it also says at the end WHO WON WHO'S NEXT YOU DECIDE Which in epic rap battle of history.com says 64 percent of people voted for Vader in there first battles while only 36 percent went for Hitler proving that people as I said roots for who had a better performance with the given character and how they have used there lines.And in the match Vader got the upper hand with the help of various reasons His voice His movement And how perfectly Vader made the lines sound like. picrapbattlesofhistory.com/videos/darth-vader-vs-hitler,AFA-rOls8YA/vote/# About the Second rap battle I will prove that Overall Vader still won due to most votes Till next time
EPIC RAP BATTLES OF HISTORY Darth Vader VS Adolph Hitler BOTH 1 AND 2 OVERALL WINNER

"First of all Vader put better raps in the first battle plus froze hitler and asked him to auck vaders robot balls which were overall funny including this line "you cant rap against the dark side of the force why even bother so many dudes slept with you mom who even know that I am your father" plus he did that with his awesome voice" I have a couple issues with this. When Darth Vader froze Hitler, there was an extremely long gap in between his rapping. That is to say Vader stopped rapping when he froze Hitler. This made the rest of his last rap extremely awkward and rather rushed. It disrupted his "flow", and made him speak quite quickly, which sounded ridicolous with his voice distorter. You found that line funny, I find it mildly distrubing and homosexuel, we both have different opinions so the argument is dropped. "Not to mention this rap "Everything that you did I am the motherfu..er who invented it I am the original dark lord your like sorcerers apprentice" I pity the fact that Vader had to use obscene words, it made him sound un-intelligent. Also, the reference to the Sorcereors apprentice was not tactfull-it is quite an obscure book. A more popular reference would have been more clever and in the form of better rap. Hitler Stayed in character the whole time All of Hitlers lyrics pertained to the historical figure, or the events they caused. This was incredibily witty and hilarious. Vader broke character Vader broke character many times to insult Hitler, showing that he could not adjust his lyrics to fit his character. It made for a less witty rap.
EPIC RAP BATTLES OF HISTORY Darth Vader VS Adolph Hitler BOTH 1 AND 2 OVERALL WINNER

Though it is 2:00 am here and I am only using my phone I shall try my best First of all Vader put better raps in the first battle plus froze hitler and asked him to auck vaders robot balls which were overall funny including this line "you cant rap against the dark side of the force why even bother so many dudes slept with you mom who even know that I am your father" plus he did that with his awesome voice Not to mention this rap "Everything that you did I am the motherfu..er who invented it I am the original dark lord your like sorcerers apprentice" Ok so I will prove further that vader won that not just by his raps but with Officiall fan votes straight.from Epic rap battles of history website
On balance, Taxation is worse than rape

After 5 years of being inactive from debating, I am sorry but I cannot continue this rein. This is a topic I have been too silent about. A topic that has been burning in my chest that I cannot be silent about anymore. Too often libertarians are straw-manned, Told they keep on saying that they compare taxation to rape and how disgusting it. Well, It's time to end this strawman and stereotype. It's time to stop. Taxation is not an equal to the act of rape. No, It is far worse! We will make the following assumptions:- We will compare the act of rape to a year's worth of taxation in America- In this hypothetic situation of rape, We will assume no risk of STIs or pregnancyIt is my opponent's burden to prove that in this scenario, Rape is worse than taxation. It is my burden to prove that in this scenario, Taxation is worse than rape. Feel free in the comments to discuss any additional rules or clarifications. First round is for acceptance only, No debating. Only three pictures allowed per round to prvent picture abuse.
On balance, Taxation is worse than rape

CON has not addressed any of my rebuttals, And instead wished rape on me. This is a conduct point. I would not wish rape on anyone, Anymore then I would wish the horrible incident of taxation on anyone. CON uses the theoretical scenario whether I would enjoy it, But as I stated previous I find the real scenario of losing over $20, 000 much worse and CON has not tried to rebute the claim of how much in monetary damages the act of having sex with someone you don't want does to someone. So CON has not affirmed that his religion dogma is correct. CON has not justified his argument of "listening to authority" as this justifies killing people under government rule. CON does not deny the difficulty of movement, Thus the "just move to a place with low taxes" is invalid. CON's argument that people would rather pay taxes than go to jail has been rebutted since I have shown that jail is much worse than rape. To reiterate my arguments: -It is better to be forced to do an activity that you derive pleasure from than an activity you do not derive pleasure from: CON has not rebutted this claim and the negative harms of taxation vs the benefits of sex. -The cost of taxation is far higher than the cost of having sex with someone you don't like: I have show that the damages done by taxes would compensate the nominal rate of having sex with someone you don't like by 46 times. This has not been refuted. -Taxes are used for causes that net harm the world: CON does not deny the many harms that taxation has on the world, And thus the third party it affects and the mass suffering the state causes. This has not been refuted. Thus even if CON is miraculously able to prove that its worse on the individual to get raped than get taxed, CON would have to prove it is much worse to offset the harms of the state CON has dropped most of my arguments, While I have rebutted his claims.
On balance, Taxation is worse than rape

Most religions or ethical doctrines secuakr included accept that in exchange for certain rights, Resposible ethical people must accept certain respsibilities in order to be considered an adult and of majority and maturity. . One is paying taxes legally owed to authoities, If one finds the taxation rate too onerous one can move to a jurdistiction where there are little or no taxes like the Cayman islands. Or one can go to jail. . Where one can be properly raped. . If you feel like taxes really are as bad as rape don't pay them. . They will put you in place where you will be repeated raped for real. . So if you really feel taxes are as bad as rape. . Don't pay them. . Most people do pay them. . Some out of duty to society. . Most people because they don't want to be sent to federal prison where they will be raped for real. . Provinh most people the vast majority of people prefer paying taxes to being gang raped in jail. . I think i win with this argument
On balance, Taxation is worse than rape

My opponent has used the bible as a source to say that taxation is better than rape. However, It has not addressed any of my claims, So extend all arguments. Furthermore, He has not proven that the bible is a valid source. Why is the bible considered the correct interpretation of god when there are other religions: buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh and so forth. It is my opponent's burden of proof to show that his religion is the correct one and therefore his arguments are valid. Furthermore, This argument only states you should submit to authority. However, Rape is a fork of submitting to authority so this argument does not negate mine and he loses all points, While not arguing against any of my arguments.
On balance, Taxation is worse than rape

Study Bible Submission to Authorities…5Therefore, It is necessary to submit to authority, Not only to avoid punishment, But also as a matter of conscience. 6This is also why you pay taxes. For the authorities are God’s servants, who devote themselves to their work. 7Pay everyone what you owe him: taxes to whom taxes are due, Revenue to whom revenue is due, Respect to whom respect is due, Honor to whom honor is due. …Romans 13:6
Death Battle: Midna vs Fi

I thank Kpleus for accepting. It seems like he he believes Midna would win. But here's why Fi would have a higher chance of victory. Strength:While Fi hasn't been shown of intense strength, Zelda Dungeon states she assisted with the forging of the Master Sword: http://www.zeldadungeon.net...Agility:In Hyrule Warriors, her attacks reflect that of a dancer. And, while reading the writing after every boss fight, Fi also dances. The specific dance is ballet, which requires many years of practice, involving coordination, and flexibility. I imagine this would reflect how agile Fi is in combat.Source for Fi's ballet: ;(Timestamp: 9:15)On top of being a skilled dancer, she is able to fly and teleport. The point for agility goes to Fi.Durability:Outside of Hyrule Warriors, I don't think Fi was ever attacked. So we're not able to judge her durability.Abilities:Holy Light: Many of Fi's attacks in Hyrule Warriors involve some form of light. Whether it's creating an exploding orb, or creating a damaging symbol on the ground.Skyward Sword: In Hyrule Warriors, Fi can turn into a sword and slash her foes. She can become a sword, and raise herself skyward to gain energy. She can then use this energy to either increase her attacks, or unleash it with a Skyward Strike; a projectile which is a mechanic in Skyward Sword.Fi Captioning: In Skyward Sword, Fi can identify enemies and check for any weaknesses they may have, like Navi.Dowsing: In Skyward Sword, Fi has the ability to scan for auras, so searching for Midna will be easy, though she has to activate Dowsing, and search for her.High IQ: It's stated that Fi has a lot of intelligence. She is shown to make calculations about probabiity, best course of action, and able to translate the old writing at the end of every boss fight.Equipment:Fi doesn't have any equipment.Conclusion:My opponent will state why Midna could beat Fi. And we aren't to only make affirmitive cases. Not only do we say why our character will win, we can also why the opposing character will not win.So, Kpleus, how does Midna defeat Fi?
Death Battle: Midna vs Fi

Midna had more plot relevance in TP. I thought the audio clips they played for Midna added a nice dose of personality. Midna doesn't make Link look like an idiot, she tends to be mysterious, but yet still very helpful. Her personality changes later in the game her personality changes from her sarcastic self-centered core. Midna had both an interesting backstory and a compelling personality. Midna is the intolerable imp-turned compassionate and inseparable ally. Her relationship with Link was arguably the best and most fleshed-out of any character in the series beforehand. She was an interesting character overall and she had a huge involvement in the actual story itself.
Death Battle: Midna vs Fi

Light and Dark, tools that were used by Link in order to save Hyrule. But which element is more powerful? Midna, the Twilight Princess, and Fi, the Spirit of the Goddess Sword. Who would win in a fight? Does Light overcome Dark? Let's find out.Rules:1) This debate will be about comparing certain stats; Strength, Agility, Durability, Abilities, and Equipment.2) My opponent will choose either Midna or Fi round 1. I'll be arguing that whoever the Contender doesn't pick would win.3) No arguments from bias (Like if someone said Mario would beat Mega Man because there's so many Mario fanboys).4) No new information in the final round, since I'll be unable to repsond to such. Doing so will count as an instant loss.5) Attacks from Hyrule Warriors will be valid. However, mechanics from Hyrule Warriors (Weak Point gauge, Focus Spirit, etc.) will not be valid.6) No outside help. However, if the character is able to summon clones, that is allowed. But no more than 3 clones out at a time.7) The battle will take place in a 100ft x 100ft x 75ft arena, so no homefield advantage is present.8) No trolling of any sort.Stats:These are the stats we're going to discuss in the fight:Strength: How powerful the character is.Agility: How fast the character is.Durability: How much damage the character can take.Abilities: Projectiles, summoning wolf copies, teleporting, etc.Equipment: What equipment the character has, if anything.
Financial on magic ring ,lost love spells marriage spells call me usa south africa +27614364221

Spam (stylized SPAM) is a brand of canned cooked meat made by Hormel Foods Corporation. It was first introduced in 1937 and gained popularity worldwide after its use during World War II. By 2003, Spam was sold in 41 countries on six continents and trademarked in over 100 countries (except in the Middle East and North Africa).
Financial on magic ring ,lost love spells marriage spells call me usa south africa +27614364221

ARE YOU DISAPPOINTED IN YOUR LIFE AND YOU HAVE .. /TRIED LEFT AND RIGHT WITH OUT SUCCESS HERE IS YOUR HELP +27614364221 uk canada usa cyprus has got a good reputation from all over Africa and for so many years SAME DAY RESULT ,And here are some of his workings -. REPLY ME WITH YOU FULL CONTACTS EMAIL AND TELL NUMBER ) YOU WILL BE HELPED +27614364221 or email Bring back Lost love spells. With powers of the spells Money spells. Job promotion spells Attraction spells. Divorce spells. Spell to find lost property or items Spell for find thieves Revenge spells. Win lotto spells and Gambling of any type Gay spells Lesbian spell, marriage spells fatality spells find job spells cleansing spell from bad luck Remove bad luck from the past Ring of powers and control magic LOVE SPELL/ MONEY SPELL He or She cheating on you, you want to stop it ? , for only 5 days treatment and you are done with * Bring back lost lover even if lost for so long time, in 3days, by use of his spell caster method of 2 way system this can be done physically by use of his spell cast burn herbal turbs,or though verbal system , i have seen people come to me they are crying and go back when they are happy
yo momma fight

dang son. it might be difficult to beat those :P so here they are: 1. Yo mama teeth are so yellow, when God said "Let there be light", he told her to smile. 2. Yo momma so dumb she went to Disney World and saw a sign that said "Disney World - Left" so she went home. 3. Yo mama so poor she can't even put her two cents in this conversation. this was fun :)
yo momma fight

ha ha my bad :P sorry about that :) i will post an extra one to make it up :) my jokes: 1. Yo mama like a carpenter's dream, flat as a board and easy to nail. 2. Yo mama so poor burglars break in her house and leave money. 3. Yo momma so ugly even Rice Krispies won't talk to her! 4. Yo momma so fat she stepped on a rainbow and made Skittles
yo momma fight

I'm new to this site and I've seen a lot of yo momma debates going around, so for my first debate I decided to try one. Good luck to my opponent, whoever it may be. Rules: 1. Post 3 yo momma jokes 2. This is just for fun, don't freak out or anything lol Now, my 3 jokes: 1. Yo momma's so fat, she's got more chins than a Chinese phone book 2. Yo momma's so old, when she was born the Dead Sea was only sick 3. Yo momma's so fat, she jumped up in the air and got stuck
pedophilia

That is not a philosophical position, that is assumption based on your judgemental conservative nature. You are just avoiding the real issues because you know you are wrong in your thinking and have been brainwashed by conservative politics and closed minded bigots who only care about winning elections,power, and money,and not about the people. Stand up for yourself and stop being a slave to the system. You have a brain,so use it to come up with a better argument than, "you are wrong, I think i'm going to have to call the cops now". Which is stupid because free speech is not a violation to the law even if it is against your conservative politics.
The Bible is 100% Accurate

"someone who is unsaved non believer will not understand what the bible say's,' u need To be born again to understand the Bible." This is an argument you used in our previous debate, and it is not a valid argument. It is an excuse that the faithful use to attempt to invalidate claims of inconsistency within the bible made by non-believers. Please refrain from presenting this as part of a formal argument. Your refutation was an interesting read, to say the least, however it is clearly copied and pasted from elsewhere, and since you didn't provide the source there is no way for me to assess how trustworthy the author is. However, that alone does not render your refutation invalid at all. You (or rather your source) may be absolutely correct in the assumption that the two genealogies given were both valid genealogies, but referred to different sides of Jesus' family. However, there is no evidence to support this supposition beyond the argument that 'it makes sense this way.' I will admit that I cannot really argue against the points you made, but this is not to say I agree, this is just to say that I do not have sufficient evidence to disprove the argument, but, that being said, you don't have sufficient evidence to prove it. Because of this evidentiary stalemate, I am perfectly willing to allow that apparent error in the bible to be explained by your rationalization, however that was just one error out of ten that I presented, and I would be interested to see your refutations for the rest.
Should Corporal Punishment be allowed at school

I am going to go pro on this on, but not all the way. Let me explain, I believe that some slight forms of corporal punishment should be allowed, but not to the extent that you are talking about in your argument. In schools, children do not learn as much when they are being disrupted by other classmates. If a classmate is being a distraction, the others don't learn. If there are some very mild forms of punishment like a slap on the rust with a ruler or some other form of mild physical punishment, the student will be more likely to stop and quit being a distraction at other times. If physical punishment is only used as a last resort, being punished will become a thing that students (especially young students) not want. If a student knows they will only be lectured, they will be less likely to stop behaving that way than if they were lectured and mildly punished physically. When a student wants attention, sometimes they act out to get it. If they gen punished corporeally they wont resort to acting out in school to get the attention that they yearn. Also if it is used less often, and more conservatively, the student will not be psychologically harmed in the process.
LeafyIsHere is a bad youtuber

I accept the challenge. Leafyishere is not a "bad youtuber" because bad is inherently a vague and subjective term. If a person doesn't like what he says or if he hurts their feelings, that person will probably say he is a bad youtuber. But this can be said about any content creator. Leafy just happens to be more of a provocateur than most. What can you actually say to prove that he is a "bad" youtuber? I mean, it's the exact same thing as calling him a bad person. Ask yourself, are there really any bad people? And by the most often used meaning of bad, in what way is Leafy an ineffective, broken version of a youtuber?
Science can prove that God doesn't exist

How very unfortunate of you to have to rely on videos for me to see but how very lucky you that YouTube on my side is not working well for some reason.But enough of excuses.I shall conclude my debate. Firstly , I do not believe I am leaning away from the topic but am rather explaining that you refusing to argue with my example of the Big Bang by stating that we do not have any arguments on how the universe began proves that science is just made up of theories when it comes to our origins and therefore cannot prove that there is no God because The Bible ( You broke the rules and allowed me to make adjustments so I am doing just that ) makes sense when it states that God CREATED the universe. Second , yes , this isn't a debate on whether God exists but you do not make sense by saying this, "Yes, God as we imagine might be over everyone else, but this is not a debate if God exists!" I was merely explaining that if God is the master over everything it would only make sense that He should not be bound by His own laws.After all,He is as depicted by all religions as a SPIRITUAL BEING and spirits are not bound by SCIENTIFIC LAWS. Third , you say that by me saying that the theory of Evolution has flaws I am out of topic.But you did not see the point.The point was that science can't be used to disprove God if it cannot even come up with properly thought out theories that aren't so easily contradicted by OTHER SCIENTIFIC FACTS. Also , the last part was put as an example.I was just trying to use an analogy to explain what I was trying to say which was that there has to be someone who created the things we see all around us and gave each and every one of these things specific instructions in order for it to function properly and logically. Besides that , as important as your views may be you have put no proper evidence that SCIENCE can disprove God.What you have done was merely put in your arguments based on your views.As for your videos,I bet that they are only videos teaching us ABOUT the theories and not stating any proof of the theories being true. Finally , as strong as your arguments may seem to you , you have once again based your argument on your views and have not really argued on my FACTS. Check and Mate.