The teleological argument is evidence of a designer deity.

"When the solution is simple, God is answering." - Albert Einstien Since this is the "opening arguments" round, I will not touch the arguments my opponent brought up. That's for the next round.All of my arguments in favor of a designer deity boil into three key arguments: Physical Evidence, Psychological Evidence, and the Unity of a Designer Deity and Science.ARGUMENT 1: THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCEAll creation points to a creator. That point is key. Whenever we see a painting, a sculpture, or even a bit of text in a book (or on a debate website...), we know that something or someone made it. The painting did not paint itself, the sculpture did not erode into that formation, and that text was not randomly generated. There was an intellegent mind behind it. A painter, sculpter, or writer who designed and created that bit of work.All design needs a designer. And thus, we must accept that the world, the universe, and everything in it must have an intelegent mind behind it. That inteligent mind is a designer deity.ARGUMENT 2: THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCEThis point will seem a bit strange at first. Although there haven't been any studies on this topic, in general, human beings have a desire to look for a greater intelligence than their own. Take, for example, the search for alians. Many scientists are convinced that they will find some greater intelligence in the stars. In fact, leading evolutionary scientist Richard Dawkins, when asked about how humans could have come into being said: "Well, it could come about in the following way. It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved, probably by some kind of Darwinian means, probably to a very high level of technology, and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. Now that is a possibility, and an intriguing possibility. And I suppose it's possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer."(http://theoligarch.com...)Humans, in their minds, want a higher inteligence. As Voltaire once said: "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent Him." (http://www.brainyquote.com...) People have an inwad desire to find a greater being. An inteligent creator somewhere out there.I can't explain this point perfectly, so if my oponent wishes to dismiss it, he may.ARGUMENT 3: THE UNITY OF A DESIGNER DEITY AND SCIENCEAs a creationist, I have run into many arguments against creationism. Perhaps the most common is: "Look how far science has brought us, can your religion do that?"Against this is a very simple answer: Science and Religion are not mutually exclusive.Acceptence of a designer deity does not constitut in any way the denial of science. All it denies is the evolutionary means of creating the world (A big bang or any other means other than a creator).Many famous scientists have also believed in a designer deity. To name a few: Nicholas Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday, Gregor Mendel, and Albert Einstein. All of these people understood and used science, but still believe in a designer deity.So, in conclusion, Physical and Phychological evidence point to a designer deity, and this is a possibility scientifically. Because of this, I stand as the PRO, that The teleological argument is evidence of a designer deity.