The Bible proves that Jesus was not God!

I would like to note some things I have noticed from my opponent before rebuttal. Note 1. Everything my opponent as argued for has hopped back and forth between logic and scripture. Much of scripture is counter intuitive while simultaneously believable. Defining the God in humans terms in an impossibility and all true Christians will admit this. The article from "Rationalwiki" failed to meet standards of conduct and also used a man-made system of logic, the law of non-contradiction. I am currently in another debate, in which I discuss my issues with the law of non-contradiction.(http://www.debate.org...) The Godhead is outside of human understanding so using our limited concepts will fail in understanding God.Note 2. My opponent misunderstood, intentionally or unintentionally, my point about Jesus putting limits on Himself. A possible allegory would be the following. If a man builds a chain link fence and locks himself inside, he is at the point "limited" to the confinement of said fence. However, he would still hold the key in which he could go outside the boundaries of a fence. Therefore, Jesus was not truly limited so He could fully be God while choosing to not to know something. Knowledge did not precede God if you believe in a God that preceded everything. A good article that addresses all the major issues discussed does far is http://carm.org.... However, for the sake of moving on and not mindlessly repeating points each of us have made I want to introduce another flaw in my opponent's argument."My opponent must be a Christian that believes the Holy Bible is the infallible, perfect word of God."This is the premise for this debate. We are not going to discuss the validity of scripture, the errors in scripture, or the existence of God. These are the terms that they opponent has set. "The Bible proves that Jesus was not God!" This is my opponents thesis. My job is to show how Pro cannot not say that logically. He has not provided a single clear scripture in which Jesus says, "I am not God." All of his arguments have presupposed that God is a certain way. They have presupposed that God follows the law of non contradiction. Let me say my presumption. I believe love and communication must have preceded the world's creation. Both love, and communication must have an object. Therefore God, before creating anything (including angels, heaven, and such) must have had an object to love and to communicate with. I get this concept from this guy. (http://www.youtube.com...)My opponent is slowing withdrawing his statement that "The Bible Proves Jesus is not God." and changing it to "Jesus is not God." Individual verses from the Bible can be arrange to propagate almost any dogma. I will not question the integrity of the opponent and assume he has read the entirety of scripture, though I confess many of Christian brothers have failed to do so. The tenor or theme of scripture is centered around Christ, and without Christ all fails. Christ had to be 100% man and 100% God. This is a illogical mathematical formula. The Christian does not teach logic, it teaches Christ. I do not think this teaching is without proof, but the proof is not found in logic, rather in the Holy Spirit's enlightenment. This is my advantage over my opponent. I have Christ in my heart while he does not. This does not make him less credible on other issues, but it does when it comes to the Christian faith. Colossians 2:8-10, "See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. 9 For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, 10 and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority."John 20:28 "Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God"The Bible does not disprove Christ being God.