Free Market Capitalism (Pro) vs Statist Communism (Con)

WAGESActually, Switzerland is a very individualistic nation, that's why tey have the most pro-gun laws in the world. Besides, if individuals can, without goveronment interference, pay their workers a good wage,then we have no need for a state to establish a minimum wage. Fact is the goveronment doesn't force employers to pay their workers acertain sum, so your argument of collectivism is complete nonsense. My opponent then states:"This double negative is a bit confusing at first, but it basically means "The more people who are employed, the more expendable workers are, which is correct. The more people you have working in a field, the more expendable they are. Therefore, wages would stay the same or stagnate, because your employing more people." No, I said that the less unemployed there ae, the less expendable workers are, which means that the more unemployed there are, the more expendable workers are, ad the more employed there are, the less expendable they are.For example, if you had 5 employees, and there was no one else inthe world for you to hire, these guys wouldn't be very expendable, but if you had 5 employees and there were 7 billion unemployed people, thenyou could replace these workers at any time. Adam Smith States:"There are certain circumstances, however, which sometimes give the labourers an advantage, and enable them to raise their wages considerably above this rate; evidently the lowest which is consistent with common humanity. When in any country the demand for those who live by wages, labourers, journeymen, servants of every kind, is continually increasing; when every year furnishes employment for a greater number than had been employed the year before, the workmen have no occasion to combine in order to raise their wages. The scarcity of hands occasions a competition among masters, who bid against one another, in order to get workmen, and thus voluntarily break through the natural combination of masters not to raise wages." - The Wealth of Nations, Book 1 Chapter 8EPARight, no one said they intentonally dumped toxins into a river, no corporation makes mooney off of poisoning people. They make money off of things like fracking and don't care when it poisons the water supply. The free market didn't allow corporations to 'sink their grip into the goveronment, allowing corporations to get away with anything they wish,' that was our corrupted legal system. MONOPOLIESYou can't own the rights to daraprim since that isn't a thing. You may be able to own some daraprim, but you cannot own daraprim itself without owning every last drop of it. It's like if I got a patent on wood, I maye able to own a certain ammount of wood, but not wood itself. Martin's 'property rights,' are in actuality just a goveronment mandate, on ccount of Martin paying them, that no one can enter this market he created. It's nothing more than a goveronment chartered monopoly, there's nothing whith which to own about it! It's illegal as per the Sherman Anti-trust Act, so the goveronment had no right to "sell" Martin the rights to daraprim in the first place. It's like if I sold you the brooklyn bridge then you expect everyone to respect your property rights, it's not yours since I had no right to sell it to you.