father christmas is real and alive

"You are right as in saying that roof tapping can be false but it never happened any other time of year." I would like to begin, with the breakdown and basic rebuttals of everything my opponent used as an argument or point. With this sentence, my opponent fails to spell and grammaratize correctly as it should be fixed to, "...any other time of THE year," ('the' is only in caps to show what needs to be added,) therefore should be noted and put down for some obvious spelling and grammar errorrs in all of the rounds so far. 1.) My opponent begins by saying that he accepts my points, and that he beleives me to be correct, but then proceeds to say something that cannot be translated into English, "but it never happened any other time of year". What led you to changing the subject so abruptly, and how does this hold relevance to your arguments? Does this even have any argumental or debate worth? I fail to see how tapping has anything to do at this unknown time of the year, (as you even failed to tell the audience what timer of the year that [roof tapping], occurs, therefore we can not even understand what your saying, much less then the audience seeing any kind of relevance this weird, badly spelled, false statement has to the argument,) and I fail to see what father christmas even has to do with tapping occuring in only certain times of the year. Please specify, and note that you have accepted my point in that sentence, therefore the point goes to con, ( your rebuttal, or whatever you tried to attempt after the 'but' in the sentence is too messed up and doesn't make any sense, or hold any relevant meaning, so we can not automatically see your point in telling us a statement, that doesn't even hold any relevance to your argument. 2.)The next thing my opponent says is this, "Proof: I was one of those children that that experienced noises and slay marks, yet I have never reported i ont he news and ((BEWARE SPELLING ERROR AHEAD)) nether have my parents."(fixed your period spacing for you,). I yet again, address the problem of relevance, and how we can even deem whatever you say, automatically and one hundred percent true. Humans lie, and have biased opinions. It's not even close to proof when you say that it happened, for an example I could say "The world is flat, because I know its flat," but that doesn't have anything in there that proves you right, in any way shape or form. Oh my gosh-good job *gold star :)* you are experiencing the realization of the fact that people LIE and proof is not just saying, "because I experienced it." I could say the same thing; I've never seen any tapping or slay marks, therefore I am one hundred percent correct and you are not, as I witnessed no slay marks tapping, see my point? Next, for the second part of what m opponent says, he says "yet i have never reported it on the news and nether have my parents," and please if you can't undestand the error in spelling, my opponent meant to write 'neither' not 'nether', so sorry if you were confused. Were we even talking about news? What the freaking heck does this have to do with ANYTHING?! So what? Who said anything about your parents? Even if you tried to report it to the news, realize how stupid you would sound, (in their opinion, as take this as an example,) heres an example: "I AM SMART BECAUSE I KNOW I AM SMART THEREFORE I AM SMART." is a dumb thing to say, and has no relevance on anything that we are talking about in this argument. My opponents weird statement about his word being law has been rebutted, therefore it is upon my opponent to provide more proof to back up this argument, or the point goe to Con. 3.) After that, my opponent says "Now I think back and know that it must have been him who brght me presents and who made the roof tapping as he did in the famus poem : Twas the night befoer Christmas, as his reindeer are meant to fly and land on rooftops but have some time on the ground." Now, straight to the chase, I don't get how him knowing something even proves anything as I could just say, "Well I know that Father Christmas doesn't exist," would that make sense? Of course not, which is exactly why the statement, "Now I think back and know that it must have been him who bruoght me presents.." is just a non-essential peice of garbage statment, along with mostly everything you've wrote as 'points', that should NOT be even brought into this debate. This proves nothing, and holds absolutely no relevance to the argument at hand, so please stop using your word as law and absolute evidence to back up anything, as YOU ARE NOT FOOLING ANYONE! And probably, you haven't convinced anyone yet as well...so far every one of your points has not made sense in any way. This point has been rebutted, therefore it lies on Pro to back up his statement with more proof and other evidence that can turn it into a real point instead of a baseless statement, along with everthing else so far thats baselses, otherwise the point goes to Con. 4.) Where my opponent goes in about the poem, I really dont want to have to get into this viewers, I only have a ltitle bit of characters left, and I'm repeating the same rebuttal for each of my opponents baseless lie-statements, so I will be breif. You have not sourced this poem. How does this hold relevance? How is this one hundred precent true? You forgot to put quotes in, so your commiting plagirism by not sourcing and not showing quotes... How is this poem famous? HOW DOES IT PROVE YOU, IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM MORE CONVINCING?!?!?! My opponent must rebutt these questions and points, or the point will go to Con if he gives up this argument. 5.) I really am not sure when he ends the poem, as he never put quotes in to show the begginging and end..so your grammar and spelling really should be graded on this, as no one can tell where the poem begins, and ends... For the remaining part about reindeer, there holds no relevance that reindeer can be so fast, that they can deliver about 10 presents in 0.5 seconds to every house in the world, (which, lets just say, is above 2 billion,) and not to mention the fact that Santa has to get in and out each house in such a quick speed that he doesn't delay the 'super fast' 'magical' reindeer by a hundreth of a second otherwise he wouldn't be able to deliver all the presents to everyone in the world. My opponent must prove this statement relevant, and prove how this even is a rebuttal to the argument I made in the last round, as above I pointed out how it is an impossibility for reindeer to be that fast... 6.)My opponent finished his arguments with saying that his last rebuttal, (he hasn't made any arguments yet, so he should at least make arguments before he rebutts mine as he still has NOT proven himself correct,) is hat "I will say father Christmas must manage to keep top secret in the heart of Lapland." AGAIN NO PROOF OR EVIDENCE OR RELEVANCE!! WHO CARES? THIS HAS NOTHING DO WITH THE ARGUMENT! Sorry, so angry at having to even deal with this stupid response over and over... All my arguments and rebuttals stand, from the last round, therefore it seems that my opponent has given me all the points and given up on every argument and rebuttal I made, therefore I guess all my points are accepted by my opponent? Unless he fixes this, everything I have said has been dropped by Pro, therefore I have had my opponent give up his stance in this argument if he fails to address my rebuttals and arguments properly.