This House Believes That Homosexuality Is Immoral!

Why homosexuality is moral and why not pedophilia and psychopathy.Because pedophilia can harm privacy, invade, and is considered weird by most people. Pyschopathy is dangerous, as insanity is hard to stop and most people are either put in insane asylums or have a death penalty/life sentence for killing people. On the other hand homosexuality is usually not invasive, and gay people aren't put in insane asylums, showing us that in fact homosexuality is more moral than psychopathy or pediphilia. If my appealing to nature is invalid, then your appealing to nature (Evolution) is also invalid. As for the phenotype/genotype, I answered it in my other rebuttals in the previous round.Can't go wrong with gays:I showed getting a girl pregnant is immoral. I already stated that if the girl does not want it, and she gets it, then it can't be acceptable. If a rational person does not want something that harms him, but you still give you that thing, then certainly it is immoral. Similarly, a girl's unwanted pregnancy is definitely immoral. Homosexual acts are moral in comparison since if you don't want a baby, you don't get a baby, and if you want to get a baby, you can just go adopt one.Homo's want children:Yes, there is a statistic that gay people are more likely to adopt children than straight people. [1] [2]" An irrational act would be opposed by all rational people. "Exactly, I showed a bunch of rational people that didn't oppose homosexuality (see last round), thus, it is not an irrational act.Rational grounding is reproduction...I already showed that you do not have to be reproductional to be rational. I already showed we can live fine without reproduction and we have live a rational healthy life. It is our choice whether or not to give birth as pass on our traits. In fact, as I already stated before, too much innate behavior can be counter-productive. What has over population done to us? Jobs are running out everywhere, leading to more poverty around the world; in order to provide these babies, we need to produce more, but in the process we pollute the air more...If we keep on exponencially growing eventually we'll reach a point where we can't sustain life any more and just halt growth almost completely while we continually pollute the air, try to open up new jobs and keeping the resources flowing. In fact I think the human race should actually slow down reproduction. While sex itself has a good rational grounding for reproduction, in our modern society with all our harms done, I think it would be alright to keep reproductional sex in moderation instead of just keep on reproducing for the sakes of reproducing." He would not have endowed people with lust without a reason behind it...." Yeah, the reason is to love like God loves. Therefore he would let everyone love each other, regardless of race or sex.Irrefuted arguments:-" If two people were really being rational, and they wanted to have safe sex, then certainly they would put on condoms and thus have zero possibility of reproduction, showing us that in this situation rational sex=/= reproductive." From last round-Not all rational people may want to produce, some may want it to do it for pleasure-Not moral =/= immoral-Our instincts are not always correct-God's infinite justness and lovingness counters my opponent's own arguments-Gay sex is still more moral than straight sex-Gay people do MORAL stuff that straight people don't do as much (adopt children)-Not all rational people dispice gay sex, thus, homosexuality can't be said as irrational neither is it immoralI think I won against the odds. 50-50? Please, I can do better than that. I had many irrefuted arguments on my side and I refuted my opponent's arguments. And keep in mind Ajabi accepted full BoP in round one, so vote accordingly.Vote CON.[1] http://www.livescience.com...[2] http://www.huffingtonpost.com...