is jesus still alive

1. "If you say that the bible is not a reliable source than you just destroyed a whole part of your first argument" No I only used the Bible to refute the Bible. The Bible contradicts itself about nearly everything including the resurrection of Jesus. I already pointed out that the bible says that resurrected bodies are raised spirits, "1 Corinthians 15:44" but Jesus was not a spirit, "Luke 24:39" This is a contradiction in the Bible and a contradiction to the resurrection claim. Jesus did not rise from the dead, because he was alive the whole time, The Bible itself confirms this, and I didn't just use the Bible, I used logic, science, and history also. Pro only used the bible, and it is not a reliable source because it is full of contradictions, Pro never addressed any of these contradictions, especially Pro did not address the contradiction of Jesus not being a spirit if he was resurrected? 2. "It also says nothing about the virgin birth" it does in (Luke 1:34)" But that is the changed bible, I said that the oldest bible we found does not mention the virgin birth The oldest bibles we found were in Palestine, and they were the letter of James, and a book written by early Christians, neither of which mention the virgin birth or Jesus' divinity, but say he is the servant of God. Pro never answered why the oldest Bible treats Jesus as a man and not God or the Son of God? 3. "I did when I said that the bible said that he did not have sex he used his power to make her pregnant by "power" I mean he used the same "power" to create the world" So Jesus was a created being then? A human created the same way Adam was created. The Quran says, that Jesus was created the same way Adam was Created. God just said, "Be," and he was. Adam had no father and no mother, so his birth is more miraculous than Jesus' Why isn't Adam then considered the Only Begotten Son of God then since his birth was more miraculous. Furthermore to beget means to have sex. God cannot have sex, so Jesus could not be the Only Begotten Son of God, because literally for God to have a son, he would need to have sex, which he cannot. Conclustion: I have used the Bible, Quran, Science, Logic, and History, to prove Jesus is not alive. Pro has only used the Bible, which I proven several times is not a reliable source, and has been changed, and other sources should be used besides the Bible to prove a point, but Pro only used the Bible which was a huge mistake in this debate. I gave many reasons why Jesus could not still be alive. 1. All humans die, Jesus was Human 2. The Bible contradicts itself about the resurrection when it says, that Jesus was not a spirit, when resurrected people are spirits, and it contradicts itself when it talks about the resurrected Jesus eating food. This account must have some basis then, and prove that Jesus was alive and not some sort of Zombie, therefore was still mortal, and still had to die. 3. I proved that Jesus died in Kashmir, and that his body is still there. Pro did not answer any of these points, he just kept using the Bible as if it was the Word of God. I already proved it wasn't 1. I showed that Bart Ehrman suggests that the Bible has been changed, since we don't have the original gospels, but only their copies of their copies which were written hundreds of years later. The Telephone game suggests they would have changed like that. 2. The oldest Bible, (The letter of James, and a book written by early Christians) proves that Jesus wasn't God, but was human (therefore he had to die) and proves that the current bible which Pro uses has been changed. Pro did not address either of these points. Pro only used the Bible to prove that Jesus is still alive, while I used the Bible, Quran, logic, science, and history to prove that Jesus is forever dead, ameen