Michael Moore lied in his movie "Bowling for Columbine"

My sources are just as credible as yours, I merely suggested it would be better if you got information that wasn't from Moore's site, which would possibly be skewed, supposing he is lying. That addresses the first two paragraphs. Moore made Heston look as though he was intentionally trying to hurt the people of Colorado by coming after Columbine. What really happened is he attended a rally he had planned on attending already, even before the tragedy. And you really think Heston would have cancelled? Do any corporate big whigs simply cancel an event they put money into out of respect? I'm not saying Hestons actions were good, I;m arguing that Moore lied about it. Which he did. If you've seen the movie, you know that it is intentionally made to make Heston look as though he wanted the rally to be after Columbine. The simple truth is he didn't. The Rally's date and the Columbine shootings just happened to parallel each other. If Hestons a jerk for mocking the mayors letter then thats his own problem, but Moore still lied, which is what the topic is about. Next, I'm guessing you didn't read the article, so here's a clipping of it about the bank [Forbes reports that an early scene in "Bowling" in which Mr. Moore tries to demonstrate how easy it is to obtain guns in America was staged. He goes to a small bank in Traverse City, Mich., that offers various inducements to open an account and claims "I put $1,000 in a long-term account, they did the background check, and, within an hour, I walked out with my new Weatherby," a rifle. But Jan Jacobson, the bank employee who worked with Mr. Moore on his account, says that only happened because Mr. Moore's film company had worked for a month to stage the scene. "What happened at the bank was a prearranged thing," she says. The gun was brought from a gun dealer in another city, where it would normally have to be picked up. "Typically, you're looking at a week to 10 days waiting period," she says. Ms. Jacobson feels used: "He just portrayed us as backward hicks." ] So this is one source, along with the movie I mentioned "Manufacturing Dissent" with a live interview. I did provide the evidence, you ignored it. His filling out papers, the check writing, and the call were staged. Completly prearranged. Why they did it should be obvious: Moore didn't tell them what he was really going to do with the footage. They were probably under the impression it would be advertising. So while the bank gave out guns, they didn't just "give them out". People had to have a background check, and needed to be on a ten day waiting list. Moore and his crew arranged for it to look like a 15 minute process when it wasn't. Thats called lying. The premise is "did Moore lie in Bowling for Columbine?" and I've shown that twice he did. There are other counts I'm sure, one I just found out about was the missle silo. But the two I gave are the most talked about ones. Hestons rally was skewed to look more malicous-intended than it was, and made a bank look like they just handed out high power rifles. Both of these are false, so Moore did lie in Bowling for Columbine. Since this is a fact based debate, and I've actually given the facts, the outcome should be clear. If you want to do further research you can, I would suggest doing it for any and all documentaries you watch so you can get the facts from the fiction, and visa versa. However, as I've shown Moore did lie, which means I've prooved my premise to be true. K bye.