Children need more time at school in P.E & Sport lessons

My opponent seems to not have read my argument ladies and gentlemen. I debated as to why children don't need anymore time in P. E. My opponent is also sad to say a liar. How do I know this? She says she is a P. E. Teacher! . http://www.debate.org... But her profile clearly says she is 14 years old! Now I don't live in Australia but I'm pretty sure they don't have 14 year olds teaching P. E. I would also like to point out my opponent did say 1.45 hours over a two day period. Then she added that is below whatever X amount over a five day period. Now my opponent is assuming that all schools across the country have P. E. only two times a week which is simply untrue. My opponent has also failed to cite any sort of evidence to back up her claims that children should be getting 85 minutes more of P. E over a 5 day period. As of now, it is simply her opinion and since she is a liar then her opinion should be worth not much. My opponent now brings up the whole point about school sports after school about how parents may not have the time to run around taking their children to sport games. Or the parent/parents may not be able to afford the after school sport according to my opponent. My opponent also fails to point out that the child could join a after school team which costs nothing. My opponent also fails to point out to you the reader that the child could something called friends. This child could then hang out with said friends after school with perhaps that other child's parent watching them. So you don't need money or a parent to drive you around as long as you look at all your options. PLEASE NOTE: My opponent has CONCEDED one of the major points of this debate which is more time for P. E takes out valuable time from the classroom. Now, following my opponent "85 minutes below what they should be getting a week. " We will quickly do some math here. 180 school days divided by 5 days a week equals 36 weeks. 36 weeks multiplied by 85 minutes is 3,060 minutes. 3,060 minutes divided by 60 minutes which is a hour equals FIFTY ONE (51) hours out of the classroom for more P. E. That is certainly a lot of time taken out of the classroom simply for P. E. Imagine what a student could learn in fifty one hours? For one class, that'd be an entire quarter if you go by 45 days in a quarter! My opponent also makes the insane point that if you don't have an extra eighty five minutes a week of P. E. that these CHILDREN will eventually get obesity, high Cholesterol, and heart problems. Here, my opponent is completely incorrect. What leads to all these things is not exercising but rather unhealthy eating. I know personally that if you don't exercise much of the time but at the same time if you don't eat all this fast food junk among many other unhealthy foods then you won't get these problems later in life. Do not be fooled by my opponent outlandish lies dear reader. Next my opponent says, "NOT EVERYONE IS LIKE YOU AND WANTS TO PLAY GAMES AT LUNCHTIME. " Uhh, lets take a look at what I said why don't we? "I don't get how my opponent has a problem that the kids don't play games at lunch time. The whole point of lunch time is to eat your lunch, and sit/chat with your friends. " I think my opponent is the one who has problems reading what I stated dear reader. I specifically said that kids don't play at lunch time and the whole point of lunch time is to eat your lunch while sitting with your friends. In fact, it is by law that kids need to have a certain amount of minutes daily for lunch. My opponent then seems to go off on her next point saying "Some kids do prefer to sit and chat and what I was trying to say before is that there is NO one to tell them that it IS compulsory to play a game at lunch time (which it is not! )" My opponent tried to say nothing of such and is once again LYING to you. There are always teachers in the lunch room in the first place and look to my point above about lunch time and eating. "where at sport/ P. E time it IS compulsory to join in and play & learn a new strategy or game. " Above, that was my opponent next point. This does not mean every kid does join in or wants to. Besides, by the 4th or 5th grade most kids have learned about all the sports they will be playing. So there are no new strategies or games to learn. My opponent next point: "so yes, my opponent has made a mistake and should read more carefully and try to understand what I have said and realise that children SHOULD have more P. E / sport time" Dear reader, I have made it quite clear what my side is and what my points are. My opponent has made many jumbled points, jumping all over the place, lying to you among other things,etc. It is she who needs to read more carefully and realize she made a mistake. Final Points: Any points my opponent did not address in her second argument which I made in my first round argument I assume she concedes. My opponent continued to not to define any of her terms. My opponent offered no evidence to back up her points that kids need more time for P. E a week. She continues to throw out this number but nothing to back it up. My opponent conceded one of the major points of the debate. My opponent lied at least three times throughout the debate to you the reader and myself including her trying to say she is a "P. E. Teacher" in order to try and bolster her points. My opponent has made her arguments quite difficult to read with poor grammar and sentence structure. It also did not help to make it one giant paragraph and spell words like Cholesterol wrong. My opponent continues to make outlandish statements which are simply untrue. So therefore dear reader, when you go to vote with your ballot I ask for you to remember all this.