The Bible proves that Jesus was not God!

1. I am not the Christian, you are. I was a preacher and a teacher for more than a decade. From my understanding the only way to understand scripture is through logic. However through a long process of study, I came to the conclusion that the Bible is not the word of God. You are correct, scripture is counter intuitive. Much of the bible is unbelievable even as a Christian. 2. If the so called Godhead is outside of human understanding then people shouldn't try to understand it. The Bible was written by man alone. It was the Counsel of Nicaea that determined the trinity aspect. They couldn't have more than one God so they had to come up with the trinity. This word is not found in scripture. 3. Your claim that Jesus limited himself does not refute my argument or prove that Jesus is God. 4. CON: "My opponent must be a Christian that believes the Holy Bible is the infallible, perfect word of God." This is the premise for this debate. We are not going to discuss the validity of scripture, the errors in scripture, or the existence of God. These are the terms that they opponent has set. a) You miss understand the point of my statement. I requested a person who is a Christian that believes that the Bible is God's word. The terms I stated were for my opponent. I refuse to debate a Christian who does not believe that the scriptures are fallible. I do not believe they are this is why I am debating you. So to state that we are not going to argue the validity of scripture is a failure on your part not mine. 5. CON: " Let me say my presumption. I believe love and communication must have preceded the world's creation. Both love, and communication must have an object. Therefore God, before creating anything (including angels, heaven, and such) must have had an object to love and to communicate with. I get this concept from this guy. ()" a) I don't even know what this means, how does this prove that the scriptures prove Jesus is God? 6. I hardly think that I am slowly withdrawing from my statement about how the Bible proves that Jesus is not God just because I make the statement Jesus is not God. 7. CON: " Christ had to be 100% man and 100% God. This is a illogical mathematical formula." a) You are correct this is illogical and makes no sense, why anyone can believe this is beyond me. 8. CON: " This is my advantage over my opponent. I have Christ in my heart while he does not. This does not make him less credible on other issues, but it does when it comes to the Christian faith." a) You have Christ in your head, not in your heart. Credible, the Bible is not credible, the beliefs that come from the bible are not credible. 9. CON: " However, for the sake of moving on and not mindlessly repeating points each of us have made..." a) This is a debate we both make points and go back and forth arguing the points, I certainly do not think this is mindless, it's called debating. 10. If the Bible can be used to uphold any dogma then this is just more proof that the Bible is not from God, therefore anything it says about Jesus is invalid. The Bible moves back and forth with contradictory points about every topic it declares. No wonder there are about 40,000 Christian denominations! 11. Christians declare there is one God, yet the scriptures I have shown clearly state that the Father is God, yet Christians proclaim that Jesus is God, and that the Holy Spirit is God. That is two more Gods than the one God Christians proclaim. Again this is why their was a Counsel of Nicaea, because they knew there was a problem. Argument 1. Jesus is not the same as God. Argument 2. Jesus is not all-knowing. Argument 3. Jesus never claims to be God, but he does claim to be the son of man. Argument 4. Jesus was GIVEN power and authority, he did not own it Argument 5: Jesus never claims to be God The CON has yet to adequately refute these statements within the scriptures that I stated. I will present more evidence in my last post.