Vegetarianism

I have always felt that the arguement against vegetarianism were never sufficient and could have been much better. The arguement against vegetarianism was mostly taken up by fools who love mcdonalds too much and let their stomach's decide their principles thats why I felt it neccesary to publish my thoughts on the issue. I will be arguing on grounds of health, food shortages, morality and also a religous perspective.Firstly, I understand that the arguments given proclaiming that a life of vegitarianism leads to a lack of protein and well balanced diet are defunct as humans generally overconsume protein and unless you go out to the gym for a couple of hours a day most protein consumption ends up converted into fat. However a vegitarian lifestyle can lead to serious iron defiencies which can lead to serious health problems in the future, and for those who say just use suppliments, suppliments generally don't work as you consume large dosages in a unnatural way your body can't process it and it just ends up as expensive urine. Furthermore many people argue meat is generally bad for you because it is high in fat, this is a common misnomer as most fat that you consume is from it being cooked in oil. Also meat has far less fat naturally than most dairy products of which one would have to rely on heavily to remain a vegitarian.Secondly, vegitarians often say that the meat industry force breeds animals and feeds them with disportional numbers of crops compared to the food provided with the animal if we banned meat consumption it would help massively with world hunger problems. I would respond to this by saying this may be true for the western world but the for the majority of developing nations of which is the majority of the worlds population these people rely on the local community and infrastructure rather than the global meat market. These people largely rely on the growing and slaughtering of animals not only as a large part of the local economy but to feed their children as these people don't have quorn mince and vegitarian meals not consuming meat for them would cause significant mal nutrition, as the only no meat they would consume would be rice wheat and the odd vegitable these people don't purchase neccesities from a nearby walmart and buy frozen sloppy joes they buy all goods from their local arket of which is all produced locally. Not only would banning meat for them not only hurt the local economy but it world worsen the problem of world hunger and malnutrition.Thirdly, the entire premise of the morality behind vegitarianism is the assuption that life inherently has value. However if you are not religous that is entirely ilogical. If the universe was a happy accident from pure chance along with the earth and through natural selection the species of the earth evolved leaving us with the contempary world, life has no inherent meaning and is valueless. People commonly say that even though its through chance I still enjoy things I still experience emotion, sadness and joy this gives it value. I would reply but you believe such experience and emotions are just chemicals in your brain and are just telling you to like things, to refrain from things to eat and to drink and only because they were the optimal things for you to survive as species without this hightened sense of morality were more likely to be wiped out as ultimate division and lack of morality towards other in the species would help drive it to exstinction. How could one who is irreligous say that life has meaning and it is wrong to eat meat as you are killing something that still has a significant awareness. Surely that is no premise to say that is immoral as surely if you are irreligous there is no morality as they these are delusional perceptions created by natural selection in order for us to survive easier. Finally, if you are a christian like me there are many quotes in the bible saying that the world and everything in it is a gift from God to us and likewise.