Mankind is the incarnated race of Holy and Unholy Angels

We have ruled out "believe" as opposed to "know". The tetrad over Israel's holidays is crystal clear and by all scientific calculation/methodology/inference available to mankind goes straight back to an established nation IE Holidays. So to say "red moons over Israel, therefore "God"" is perfectly justified as they all fall on those holidays as per the instruction layed out for Israel to observe their signs. I do not believe my opponent is grasping the magnitude of what is being presented and is depending on "science" in which my case supercedes. Science very simply, does not possess the ability of objectivity to answer all things as we are all stuck in the present. According to my opponents standard (limited scientific observation) of what is true, It can be likened to me hesitating to pay the electric bill: It has 1:paid postage stamp, 2:date, 3:Senders address 4: and I can read it, ...yet, I did not see the electrical company send it to me, so therefore I should not pay my bill. I do not think my opponent understands what circular reasoning actually is, and is attempting digression and obfuscation from an observable esoteric cosmological reality correlating back to Israel's establishment found in scripture that surpasses "science". It is clear his world view is limited by Scientism, ( a new trend) which answers literally nothing beyond the present. I think we have a classic case of " The atheist believes one day "science " will answer all things" Yet that day has not come. Hence he is mixing up fantasy/conjecture/no foundation and calling it science ( as some kind of standard), and seems to be hoping those around him will call this idea"science" by definition under these philosophical underpinnings. So in all this, he has not offered any real opposition to anything I presented. The case is clear in justifying The God of the Bible as a reality, in which I go on with the case of Irreducible Complexity Via the universals all man knows ( Sun moon night sea stars) as we are instructed from the Prophet Isaiah to read the scriptures line upon line precept upon precept. What is a precept? A pre-existing problem, idea, or subject. Why do we have a semicolon ( : ) in our language text? A semicolon advocates a precept. What is line upon line? Algorithm. My opponent is not answering my case of Irreducible complexity in that inside the Prophetic / Esoteric passages of scripture, all speak via the universals named above in consistency. I gave the links to learn how in some degree to apprehend what the case actually is. We can "know" ( not believe) the bible is true when we follow instruction on how to read the bible (Isaiah 28:10) found in the bible, apply it, and the end result being a case of categorized (prophetic passages) Universal (seas / stars/ night etc) hermeneutical (precept) algorithms (self-contained step-by-step set of operations to be performed) portraying the problem behind Genesis creation. No room for circular reasoning here, as the bible is tangible record, The year is 2016 because of Christ event , and the case I presented. (circular reasoning?) To illustrate a fallacy would be along the lines of the trend of scientism when examining the origins of this trend: Evolution: The theory of undirected chemical process via natural selection. The word "mutation" is ascribed to broken or damaged dna, on which is a pivotal point to the entire theory. We have a huge theoretical gap when time goes by and we find things such as the dna repair enzymes: a mechanism set in place that corrects "mutation" and acts as an inhibitor of "speciation". The theory of undirected processes is now vacuous. Moreover, genetic entropy (new information) is proving that we as a race are degenerating. No new information code added, Only deleted. What is "scientific" and observed in biology is now surpassing the original ideologies and taught curriculum that the entire evolution theory is founded upon. How much more than, the *trend of "scientism" my opponent is adhering to, spawned from that original false ideology ? I maintain my position of Irreducible Complexity as to the title of this debate as well as the bloodmoons/Tetrads over Israel correlating back to their establishment which supercedes science and available methodology while only empirically proving prophesy and also I do not accept my opponent's standard of what is true as I clearly illustrated the philosophical underpinnings of that position are based in a failed methodology, hijacking the word science by it's very definitions. .