Evolution is based on a Lie.

Rejection is the foundational basis for all atheists, agnostics and whatever ists may otherwise exists, so NO SURPRIZE HERE! I find Con to be pleasant, a bit too trusting perhaps, EXCEPTIONALLY Gullible, as are all atheist but " likeable, as such I call him ..friend! The problem lies NOT in what Con"s literature STATES, it IS WHAT it fails to SHOW ". A creature OUTSIDE a microscope! Not a single living animated creature! NOT ONE! That includes the ENTIRETY of his sources! Read it for yourself, Scan the document see if you CAN FIND the elusive creature " nope, not there " just microbes, bacteria, simple cell life " NONE which have become or becoming creatures one can see WITHOUT the aid of a microscope! The unbelieving man is forever doomed to be duped by turn of phrase, eloquence of tongue. Scientist like politicians has developed the art of claiming without showing, purporting without Reporting. Exclaiming without providing, praises of SOUND FACT ". From Scientific Reports that are replete with such words as". Suggests, implies, eludes to, likely shows, possibly, feasible " practicable " practical " viable " attainable " achievable " workable " doable " realizable " realistic " sensible " reasonable " within reason " suitable " possible " expedient fact. NOUN 1.a thing that is indisputably the case: synonyms: reality " actuality " certainty " truth " verity " gospel Ahhhh YES GOSPEL! "I reject this resolution, that evolution is based on a lie, because evolution is based on sound fact." Notice the use of Con"s DECLARATION "sound fact" without the need to PRODUCE indisputable evidence, which alone IS FACT! As to Con"s *Definitions* http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...... ACTUAL definition: Definition of evolution in English: evolution - noun 1The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth. The idea of organic evolution was proposed by some ancient Greek thinkers but was long rejected in Europe as contrary to the literal interpretation of the Bible. Lamarck proposed a theory that organisms became transformed by their efforts to respond to the demands of their environment, but he was unable to explain a mechanism for this. Lyell demonstrated that geological deposits were the cumulative product of slow processes over vast ages. This helped Darwin toward a theory of gradual evolution over a long period by the natural selection of those varieties of an organism slightly better adapted to the environment and hence more likely to produce descendants. Combined with the later discoveries of the cellular and molecular basis of genetics, Darwin"s theory of evolution has, with some modification, become the dominant unifying concept of modern biology 1The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth. ****The ENTIRE statement above was ". Shall we say ". Conveniently left out? **** 2 throught 5 had no bearing on this topic! Was not provided because they indeed had no bearing on the topic, THE STATEMENT however most certainly applied! Uh,uh,uh, must not deceive the readers con? based - have as the foundation for (something). http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...... ACTUAL definition: 1 (base something on) Use (something specified) as the foundation or starting point for something: 2 Situate at a specified place as the centre of operations: "the Science Policy Review Unit IS BASED at the University of Sussex" (Capitalization inserted for clarity) lie - an intentionally false statement. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...... ACTUAL definition: 1An intentionally false statement: 1.1Used with reference to a situation INVOLVING DECEPTION or FOUNDED on a MISTAKEN IMPRESSION: ***another attempt to deceive readers?**** yes he LIED! By the very textbook definition, he quotes himself! 1. genetic characteristics that allow an organism to live long enough to reproduce are more likely to be passed on than genetic characteristics that don't allow an organism to live long enough to reproduce. http://evolution.berkeley.edu...... Gene: noun Biology 1(In informal use) a unit of heredity which is transferred from A PARENT to offspring and is held to determine some characteristic of the offspring: (capitals for clarity) *****What PARENT are we talking about here Con?**** 1.1(In technical use) a distinct sequence of nucleotides forming part of a chromosome, the order of which determines the order of monomers in a polypeptide or nucleic acid molecule which a cell (or virus) may synthesize. ***again the microscopic ***** The central idea of biological evolution is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor, just as you and your cousins share a common grandmother. HAHAHAHAH! did I say gullible? Evolution means that we're all distant cousins: humans and oak trees, hummingbirds and whales. https://hogewash.files.wordpress.com... Chimpanzee, Dog, Mouse Chicken, FruitFly, Roundworn ".. http://scienceline.ucsb.edu... So ponder this: the Fe (iron) in your blood was at some point many, many billions of years ago in the center of a star that has since then ceased to exist. ( hahahahah I'm sorry I couldn't help myself) YES***SCIENCE IS ACTUALLY SAYING THIS?**** YOUR ACTUALLY ROGER RAM-JET! Star-man- the Last Star-Fighter, Cosmic Dust... Oh PLEASE! ****The Question is FAST BECOMING just HOW STUPID IS Man!**** How desperate, to believe in ANYTHING BUT God! 3. human chromosome 2 is a fusion of two ape chromosomes-Crap, and more crap, opinions, conjecture no proof! human produce human, ape, produce ape, crap produces crap! http://blog.drwile.com... In 2002, Study found that those sections of DNA were about 95% similar. In 2003, Study looked that found only 87% similarity. Then things became a lot clearer"sort of. In 2005, the complete draft sequence of the chimpanzee genome was published. Result? the entire chimpanzee genome could be compared to the entire human genome found that 75% similar. However, given that 3% of those base pairs don"t line up perfectly, human and chimp DNA are about 72% similar. Several geneticists have obviously looked at these data, and there are those who think the number will eventually drop below 72% once all the data are in. In fact, Dr. Richard Buggs (geneticist at the University of Florida) says I predict that when we have a reliable, complete chimpanzee genome, the overall similarity of the human genome will prove to be close to 70% (and very far from 99%).6 In spite of what the data say, PBS asserts the following: Today, many a schoolchild can cite the figure perhaps most often called forth in support of [a common ancestor for apes and humans]"namely, that we share almost 99 percent of our DNA with our closest living relative, the chimpanzee. 7 I think PBS needs to stop listening to schoolchildren when it comes to evidence for evolution. Of course, the big question is: If 99% similarity was such strong evidence for a common ancestor between chimpanzees and humans, will 70% similarity be considered evidence against a common ancestor? Of course not! Evolution can use special pleading to accommodate any data. It does so with the fossil record, homology, etc. Why not do it with genome similarities as well? Evolution makes no claims about the origin of life on earth. Really? Human Evolution by The Smithsonian Institution's Human ..., Evolution 101: Human Evolution, human evolution | Britannica.com, Human Evolution News " ScienceDaily, human evolution Facts, information, pictures ... Now shall we dispense with the BULL Con? IF you didn"t KNOW we were talking about HUMAN evolution WHICH I KNOW IS A LIE, and the reader need ONLY read the comment section to know that YOU KNEW we were talking about HUMAN EVOLUTION!