We should eliminate atheism from society like Islamic countries.

... Your first point doesn't disprove my point. I said, "Atheists don't believe in a God, so they are equally intolerant of Islamic propaganda. Sweden is filled with SJWs, it isn't atheists' fault. You can't just say, "Sweden has few religious people; Sweden let in Muslims, therefore atheists favor Muslims." You need more proof. You need a study to prove atheists somehow favor Muslim nonsense over Christian nonsense. I have an answer for you though. Christians were always the ones oppressing atheists, so it is normal for atheists to focus on Christians, because Muslims are not jamming their religion down atheists' throat. If the circumstances were switched, with Christians being immigrants, I guarantee atheists would make a fuss about the Christians, because the Christians didn't do anything to them. You seem to have a poor understanding of how atheists think. We have a lack of a belief in a god. We don't favor one imaginary being over another imaginary being. It is like asking people, "Why do you favor dragons over hydras?" The answer is, "We don't." We don't believe in them. "Atheism is not a belief. This is the DDO Atheist anthem." - You don't believe in a God. That is atheism. This rebuttal doesn't prove anything anyway. "At work, an Atheist once told me his kids went to church. When I asked why, he said,"Because I wish I believed. It'd just be easier. I don't want them to think like I do every day." So, your children would be indoctrinated with hope, unconditional love, and an ideological construct that meets the hierarchy of psychological needs for good mental health: meaning, purpose, etc." - I don't believe you. You are only saying that because you would be a hypocrite of you didn't. Also, God isn't loving. He killed 25,000,000 people, and he kills innocent babies and kids too. Doesn't seem loving to me. "I have shown that Pro's idea is mind control, and he wants to jam his belief down everyones throat, regardless of their own belief." It would be an end that justifies the means. Suicides go down, happiness increases, unity increases, and Islamic threats disappear." -Explain how banning atheism will get rid of Islam and Islamic threats. Not all Muslims are bad; you can't blame them for the actions of others. Plus, the nutjobs in ISIL won't stop terrorist attacks just because we ban Atheism. Prove that terrorists attacks will stop if we ban atheism. You also ignored my point. I am saying that you can't take critism of your ideology, probably because it isn't standing up to critism. You only want your belief allowed, because you don't want other ideologies opposing you. This is like a liberal proposing to ban conservatism. They can hide their true motive, and hide it behind a facade. They can just say, "I want to ban conservatism because they oppose abortion." But their true motive is because their ideas can't stand up to scrutiny, conservatism would be getting more popular, and the like. That is what you are doing. You say it is because you want to stop Islamic terrorism, but your true motive is to knock out different belief systems, one supported by science, and others with conflicting dogmas. That is thought control, and that is wrong. It doesn't matter is atheists have a higher suicide rate, as that doesn't effect you. It is atheists' choice to commit suicide, not yours. Leave others beliefs alone. "Jesus preached love" - Matthew 10:34: Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. "Tell me Con if you are afraid of a mass sexual assault by 2,000 Christians on women. No? I didn't think so." - I am afraid of Christians like you forcing me to be Christian. If all the governments had and used that power, that scares be more then anything ISIL has done. Also, PP bombing. "The story is an allegory for the end of the world." - Proof? The bible says nothing of the sort. Either way, God killed babies. Enough said. "you don't want Islam to be accepted. That is bigotry."Bigotry is intollerance of anothers' beliefs. Technically opposing Naziism and Communism is bigotry. Attaching god to an ideology that resembles Naziism doesn't give it a pass." - How is Islam like Nazism? If Islam is like it, then Christianity is like Nazism too. Plus, it is still bigotry to try and ban atheism and all other beliefs. That is absurd. Your statement that, "It is atheists fault Islam is more popular" is absurd. You have no proof to back this point up. Your only point is that countries with many atheists in them let in immigrants. But you can't prove that it is atheists fault Islam is more popular. This is colleration, not causation. Unless you can prove this, you lose this part of the debate. To close out this round, I will repeat this argument again. Pro wants to unconstitutionally ban all opposing religions. He doesn't care about the beliefs of others; he only wants his belief to be taught. He goes beyond wanting his belief to have special privileges, he wants all other opposing beliefs banned to make him feel better. He wants his belief endorced by the governments. He wants taxpayers to fund religion. In America, we have the first amendment, which gives the freedom of religion. Pro's idea is in direct violation of this amendment. It also is in violation of common sense. You can't stop an idea like atheism. It hasn't worked before, and it will never work in the future. You can't force people to believe in fairy tales in the bible. Reason will always beat nonsense any day of the week. We all have the right to believe in whatever we want, because believing doesn't hurt anyone. It is only actions. And funny enough, atheists are some of the least likely to commit crimes. They commit crimes disproportionally low compared to the atheist population [1]. Of the 190,000 plus in federal prisons, only 197 at atheists, which is one tenth of a percent, while atheists make up 3.1% of the population of the U.S. I will close this with another question: Why do I have to believe in your god? [1] http://www.patheos.com...