Argument for the Non-Existence of God

Conditions for the debate:1.] Pro has the burden of proof for the main argument.2.] The argument contains six (6) assumptions.3.] Any assumption not challenged in the first round cannot be challenged at a later round.4.] For sake of clarity, objections must be numbered respectively like so: (1-2) for assumption 1 objection 2; (3-4) for assumption 3 objection 4, etc.5.] An objection must illustrate a single point or argument. Supporting arguments within an objection must be numbered like so: (1-1-1) for assumption 1 objection 1 supporting argument 1.(Note: I would be more than happy to debate this argument multiple times with others. Please PM and I will reopen it)===================================Argument for the Non-Existence of God-------------------------------------------------------------------------01) If a being is thinking, then its thoughts must exist in time. (A1.)02) If God exists, then God is a being. (A2)03) If God is a being, then God has thoughts. (A3)04) If God exists, then God has thoughts. (2,3: h.s.)05) If God exists, then God exists in time. (2,1: h.s.)06) If something is in time, then it must be caused. (A4)07) If God exists, then God must be caused. (5,6: h.s.)08) If God is caused, then God is not omnipotent. (A5)09) If God is not omnipotent, then God does not exist. (A6)10) If God is caused, then God does not exist. (8,9: h.s.)11) Therefore, If God exists, then God does not exist. (7, 10: r.a.a.)Q.E.D.Justifying the Assumptions_______________________________________________________[Assumptions (1)]:Possible objection: "For My thoughts are not your thoughts, Nor are your ways My ways," says the LORD. "For as the heavens are higher than the earth, So are My ways higher than your ways, And My thoughts than your thoughts." (Isaiah 55:8-9)Defense 1: It is irrelevant that they are higher. God's thoughts are still thoughts insofar as they are to be called thoughts.Defense 2: It is incoherent to speak of thoughts that are not events or existing outside time. One would have to prove how it is possible for thoughts to be not events or outside time. Such a proof would most likely change the meaning of "thought(s)/thinking".Defense 3: This defense will rely on the following axiom, "If I cannot imagine it, then it is impossible for such a thing to exist." E.g. I cannot imagine, to wit it is impossible for me to imagine a square-circle, or a four-sided triangle. Therefore it is impossible for a square-circle or a four-sided triangle to exist.P: I cannot imagine thinking without time.C: Therefore, thinking without time is impossible.[Assumption (2)]:Defense 1: If God is not a being but a force, for example, than God does not deserve worship, neither can God be personal or listens to prayers. Neither is necessary to refer to scientific terms such as a "force" as God. It must be proven necessary.[Assumption (3)]:Defense 1: If God is a being but does not have thoughts, then it still pointless and unnecessary to believe in Him. Prayers and worship are worthless as the being would have no meaningful way to respond to prayers. God could not be a moral arbitor without thoughts as he could not perfectly reason the right from the wrong.Defense 2: Humans are made in the image of God. God would be a lesser being if He did not have thoughts as it is sometimes argued reason and intelligence eminates from thoughts. Therefore He must have thoughts.[Assumption (4)]:Defense 1: There is no record of such events that exist in time but are not caused. Experience tells us causal relations happen only in time. If there is such a thing, the one making the claim has the burden of proof[Assumptions (5) and (6)]:Defense 1: These assumptions follow from the definition of God.