Children should start learning education from the internet now, not schools.

First of all, I want YOU to know, that I have used structured and coherent arguments to dismantle yours. Furthermore, as the instigator of this argument, it is your responsibility to make me understand the argument. Udemy and Udacity seem like great examples, their sole flaw being that they are teaching at a university level, and I've never heard of them before today. I'm sure that the five year olds will know about it and appreciate it all the same. The internet is not developing more ways to teach people. I do believe you misunderstood my earlier statement regarding Wikipedia. Everything on the internet was put there by a person or company at one point or another. Websites do not magically appear with accurate information in them. A professional in that field put it there. People are developing more ways for others to learn online would be a far more accurate than what you did in fact write. If anything, I would say it is you who does not understand this argument, nor the basic foundations of the internet for that matter. Youtube. A prime example of a distraction. You claim that a classroom has distractions? Well I can say with one hundred percent certainty that for every distraction that a classroom can fabricate, the internet has three more at the very least. So rather than a building, a teacher and a group of other students, you suggest a dimly lit room, and two people talking over the internet. Where exactly is the vast number of teaching staff and apparatus (namely a decent computer for each of them) going to come from, that would be required to teach each student independently? How will these people be paid? Are you really suggesting that teaching become a free lance occupation, completely un-subsidised and open to scam artists and pedophiles to exploit? Once again reading your statement about learning basics, I ask is it truly I who doesn't understand the argument? I'm sure I don't need to remind you that the internet is navigated by typing, reading links then clicking on them. I guess a young illiterate child is supposed to what? Figure that out by itself? Or is it up to parents now to not only work a full time job, hire a full time babysitter and still maintain a social life, now they are responsible for taking on a teaching role as well? My good sir, all you have done is avoid my arguments and ignore my evidence. You persist on presenting nearly identical evidence each time. I had chosen to ignore your poor handle on the English language, but it seems you were not content to simply analyse the facts. Below are a series of grammatical errors that I picked up on, and decided would serve to illustrate my point. My point being, if you're going to play with fire, be ready to have your fingers burned almost all information you want to know is contained in the internet. you can also have social experience from the internet Learning from the internet also reduces the bullying in schools because you do not see them People have friends no matter what at some points of their life. Sometimes you just believe what the teacher is telling you not caring if it is false fact. But using the internet you can find variety of information and combine it into one, forming the most accurate information that most people agree with. People are putting way more effort to the internet than to schools. Think of the possibilities the internet can give you information. By SNS and forming study groups together. Also, statistics show that when children learn from the internet, it raises their concentration and achieve higher grades