Theistic evolution is a way to explain animals and humans today

As you can clearly see, Pro commits the logical fallacy known as "Ad Hominem" multiple times. Now to the argument(s): "Dispite his best effort, he could not refute this to his best ability" I merely asked a question. I would like you to answer the question. I gave actually. I don't know why you assume me saying that evolution is not the only conclusion is my inky rebuttal. "Skulls show the evolution process. (1) as you can see from the link, you can easily see evolution of the human skull. Again, huge similarities. I have provided DNA proof of evolution" From the last round: "Why not assume god out similar DNA in the species he created? " "He also failed to give a rebuttal to my statement that we share 5% of our genome sequence with dogs" Yet again, I need to press for an answer. There is NO good reason to assume evolution over a god creating things with common DNA. Your point was included in my question. " He also do not know what god planned" I hold this belief that god does not exist, but obviously you have no idea as well even if we did assume he was real. "We deal with mutations every day. Mutations is how evolution started. For example, an increased number of people are being born with two sets of DNA. This may be the next step in human evolution! (2) see how you something as simple as this can alter humans this much. This shows how easy evolution can start. Now, just like regular evolution, it may take a lot of years for all humans to be like this" I fail to see how this proves evolution, nor how it would help humans survive. Evolution is: "The gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form" Has pro shown how this somehow makes humans better, why it had to be evolution, and how it must have been the Christian god specifically? Not even one statement showed that. " This proves evolution again" You've proved nothing. .. Rebuttal 2: "Then who made the universe? " "Who made the planets? Who made the animals? Who made the stars? You just can't answer that. Also, I don't even see how this theory plays into this. There are other universes, but who made them? How did the cells and elements reach us? Again, you can not tell which came first. The chicken or the egg? You just dodged the question. You also failed to refute my statements adequately" I think I answered this when I showed how simultaneous causation can create universes. This is the exact theory: Three states of the universe come into being at the same time, State A causes B, which causes state C, which causes state A; all at the same time. The cause and effect exist simultaneously, all having causal explanations. I must ask you, why assume evolution and god over simultaneous causation and the multiverse. .. ? Pro's question was asserting that we cannot explain where the universe came from. He then rattles off a list of random things that he has no idea who or what created them,then concludes that it must have been a who and that being is god. This is simply an argument from ignorance [1] "Again, you fail to address the issue of the less complex organisms evolving first. I said he either created them or their ancestor. Lets go with the ladder. He made their ancestor. I also apologize for an error I made while writing my arguments. I meant non self pollinating plants. Not self pollinating plants. " No. I do not have to accept your assertion that a god created the ancestor first, as I'm clearly arguing against evolution. 1. If evolution is not true, Pro's contention fails. 2. Evolution has not been proven by Pro. .. 3. Therefore, his third contention fails. Obviously, Pro still has yet to prove over half of his arguments. Thank You Pro. [1] . http://www.fallacyfiles.org...