Hugo Weaving should be The Riddler in the next Batman movie

I accept my opponent's Terms of Service and with that will begin this debate. I would once again like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate. I ask any videos posted this debate be watched when I ask. Definitions have already been stated and the case topic is above and here: Hugo Weaving should be The Riddler in the next Batman movie. Now first, what makes the Riddler who he is? . http://batman.wikia.com... The Riddler is someone who is intelligent, well-spoken, witty. However, The Riddler is also someone at the same time who has problems due to his childhood so at the same time is crazy. (Watch the first video now) . http://www.youtube.com... Replace the Guy Fawkes Mask and outfit with a Riddler outfit and mask dear reader and we have the perfect Riddler. The man behind the mask there is none other then Hugo Weaving. . http://en.wikipedia.org... Hugo Weaving is by far and away the best choice for the role of Riddler in the next bat film as I will show in more depth throughout my case. Now, for my three conentions as to why Hugo Weaving should be The Riddler in the next Batman movie AND why he is superior to Johnny Depp in such a role. Contention One: Hugo Weaving fits many of the Riddler's Characteristics Simply put, Hugo Weaving as the Riddler is like a perfect size glove for a hand. He has the look that closely resembles The Riddler. . http://upload.moldova.org... He has already proven he can play the role of a intelligent villain such as with Agent Smith in The Matrix. (Watch Second Video Now) . http://www.youtube.com... Hugo Weaving has also shown his superb acting skills in other films such as Little Fish in which he won the 2005 AFI Best Actor Award. (Watch Third Video Now) . http://www.youtube.com... Hugo Weaving also has played the role of a man who childhood experiences have made him bitter and resentful like The Riddler in the 1991 film Proof. . http://en.wikipedia.org...(1991_film) Contention Two: Hugo Weaving fits the nolan verse better then Johnny Depp Nolan Verse - The Batman Universe created by Christopher Nolan (director of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight) in which the characters including the villains are more realistic. Which is why you the reader will never see villains such as Clayface in Christopher Nolan's Bat movies. Hugo Weaving has been in many great roles, however unlike Johnny Depp he has not become "hollywood. " Which means if I went to see a movie, I would know that's Johnny Depp just by the way he acts which would take away from the movie and the role that Johnny Depp is filling. I'm sure many of you readers know exactly what I'm talking about and would think the same for such an actress like Angelina Jolie. Also, when Johnny Depp is acting; it's usually over-the-top and well. .. Johnny Depp. Acting like one's self isn't too difficult. That is also another thing, over-the-top characters are few and between in the Nolan Verse. It works for the Joker because the Joker in the comic book is and has always been a over the top psychopath which would suit Johnny Depp better then the cunning mastermind that is the Riddler. However, as stated it would not work well with the Riddler as it would be too silly and not fit the "dark gritty" universe that Nolan is trying to upheld. Johnny Depp would fit best in a Tim Burton Batman Universe (the director whom he most works with) rather then a Christopher Nolan Batman Universe. Third Contention: Hugo Weaving plays a superior villain compared to Johnny Depp. As already stated; Hugo Weaving has played what be considered the main villain in the Matrix series; Agent Smith. Hugo Weaving has also played the evil Decepticon leader; Megatron in Transformers. Both roles he played exceedingly well. Now my dear reader, I pose to you this question: Which villains has Johnny Depp played in his career exceedingly well? I'm not talking about anti-hero loner like characters which is a great portion if not majority of Johnny Depp's roles but actual villains in which you'd root against on screen. The closest Johnny Depp has ever gotten to such a role was Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street in 2007 but even then he was made into a loner anti-hero like character that one came to pity; especially with the ending that I will not give away for those who have not seen it. So therefore, Hugo Weaving not only has more experience in playing the villain role then Johnny Depp but has proven himself to be excellent at it. Johnny Depp meanwhile has not proven himself in any sort of villain role that he would be playing in the nolan verse where the villains are not pitied. Should we trust Johnny Depp in such a role? I think not dear reader. Some other notes: Where would Johnny Depp have the time to film this in the near future? . http://www.imdb.com... As his schedule shows, he will be quite busy and I question whether he would be able to give 110% commitment to such a film with such a busy schedule compared to Hugo Weaving who is nearly not as busy. Hugo Weaving would be more believable in a fighting scene then Johnny Depp as well. Evidence of this would be video four (feel free to watch now). Despite the fact The Riddler is not a physical (more mental) villain, every nolan bat film thus far has seen Batman fight the main villain. . http://www.youtube.com... My final point, Weaving would also be superior in making speeches or riddles which The Riddler is quite famous for in the comics. Evidence of this would be in video five (feel free to watch now). Notice how he is able to not only keep your attention but get his point across. . http://www.youtube.com... To sum up: 1. ) Hugo Weaving fits the characteristics of The Riddler. 2. ) Hugo Weaving would better fit the nolan verse then Johnny Depp. 3. ) Johnny Depp is too over-the-top and silly along with too hollywood to play The Riddler. 4. ) Johnny Depp would be better suited in a Tim Burton Batman Universe then Christopher Nolan Batman Universe. 5. ) Hugo Weaving plays a superior villain compared to Johnny Depp. 6. ) Johnny Depp is unproven in the Villain role. 7. ) Johnny Depp does not have the time to film for such a role in the future; Hugo Weaving does. 8. ) Hugo Weaving would make the fight scenes (such as the ones that took place in The Dark Knight) more believable then Johnny Depp. 9. ) Hugo Weaving is better suited in holding the audience's attention for a period of time for things such as riddles or speeches. Dear Reader, one final note: I realize, looking back that my argument may seem to have it's focus on Johnny Depp as much as Hugo Weaving. However, that is the point of the debate. Going back to the pre-debate round to what my opponent and I both agreed upon: "So therefore, me and my opponent both have the burden of proof to prove: Our actor is superior The other actor is not superior" Both burdens I feel that I have proven today.