Walt Disney is Cryogenically Frozen (and will be thawed in the near future)

Now that Round 2 is over, the debate will now continue into the negative cross examination and rebuttal phase.Denial by the Disney Family:I would like to extend this counterargument once again so that I can explain more on my response to this argument. Yes, the Disney Family denies Walt Disney's cryonic preservation, but any rational human being should have the reason enough to realize that even families withold the option to keep family matters private from the public eye because - well - they are private family issues. Again, this is more of a family issue than my issue, so the reason why the Disney family would deny Walt's cryonically preserved state is something which I cannot explain with ultimate certainty. Theoretically, if Walt is cryonically preserved, then it would have been known at the time that, if cryonic preservation would have failed, then the children of Walt's time would be forced to suffer two different deaths of Walt Disney, making it all the more painful for the children of the world who looked up to him - but I digress, this is only theory, and I do not use this as an authoritative argument in any defensible way, because I cannot know for certain.Cryonics:I am not sure how to refute this argument, because it appears to be a conceding statement that cryonic preservation is indeed possible; which is, in effect, the very argument I took in Argument 1.1 and Argument 1.2 in my introductory arguments. I am interested in seeing how my opponent elaborates on this in his rebuttal.Not the Near Future:While it is true that there have been no recorded attempts at reviving a human from cryonic suspension, this does not mean that we will not discover a way to do so in the future which, as the debate topic states, would be when such a technology would be possible. "Lower levels of cold only slow decomposition, which is why we could not just thaw out the hypothetical dinosaur trapped in ice; if in doubt please check your freezer for expiration dates (most people have had the taste of an unopened item ruined by being in there too long). The greater levels of cold used which lead up to Liquid Nitrogen, massively damage the body; newer techniques can decrease this, but not stop it entirely."Perhaps - although my opponent does not seem to be aware that a prehistoric virus was recently "resurrected from a 30,000 year old block of ice" [1]. Although freezing only slows decomposition, this recent discovery concerning this very virus seems to show that the slowed process of decomposition is significant enough to have allowed scientists to bring a prehistoric virus back into the modern world."Walt would have to have been frozen before the officialfirst case of it. Being a Guinea Pig for the first step, does not line up with being a Guinea Pig for the more risky single chance revival."Well, if Walt already believed that he was going to die soon, of what worth would it be to worry so much about his health and well being as a result of having his head cryonically frozen? Wouldn't he have been aware that he would be dying soon as it was? Besides, whether or not Walt would need to have been frozen before the official first case of it is moot; many scientific discoveries were made in the past, only to be discovered officially afterwards. Take the vikings for example, who many historians argue to have been the true first discoverers of the Americas, not Christopher Columbus, although Christopher Columbus is still hailed as the discoverer of the Americas to this day. [1] - http://www.scientificamerican.com...Expert Opinion:"While it can be hoped one day frozen people can be restored to life, what precise technology is needed to even undo the freezing damage remains a mystery; the other technologies involved for each patient may be even farther out."Of course such technology remains a mystery today - the theory of cryonic preservation is to discover a way to restore frozen people to life in the near future. If such technology was not a mystery, then firms like the Alcor Life Extension Foundation would already be resuscitating the people who invested in cryonic preservation half a century ago! My opponent has only stated the obvious in this assertion."Walt Disney was in his twilight years, revival in the near future only to die again soon after recovery would be pointless." Perhaps it would be pointless, but is whether or not bringing Walt Disney back to life is pointless really a valid argument for asserting that Walt Disney is therefore not frozen in ice?Cause of Death:"Walt died of lung cancer. Cancer tends to metastasize before it kills, his was no different. He would not be revived at least until cancer is cured. That cancer may be treated today, is not the same as it being reliably cured."Yes, Walt Disney died of lung cancer; but my assertion is that he has been preserved cryonically in order to be resuscitated in the near future. As for whether or not cancer could be cured, is unto itself, a red herring fallacy in light of the actual topic of this debate; however, I will note several sources nevertheless for my opponent and the voters to consider:http://www.express.co.uk...http://www.collective-evolution.com...http://cooks.ndtv.com...http://www.debate.org...http://www.snopes.com...I will elaborate more on my negative cross examinations and my rebuttals after my opponent provides his critique of my own.