the i dont know position means, i know its false

Your claims are still confusing to me, so I will do my best. You seem believe in Atheism. I do not believe in atheism because it fails to provide the preconditions of intelligibility. Atheism has beliefs like all other religions. Faith is believing in something that you do not perceive with your senses. We do not perceive logic, it is conceptual to nature, and describes the correct chain of reasoning from premise to conclusion. You would learn this if you take a class on logic. To disagree is your belief, and therefore proves my point. We all have a "religion". Believing you don't is a belief, and therefore a religion. We must presuppose our "philosophical worldview" that we base our claims on when we come to an argument (a worldview is a person"s entire set of beliefs about all things in which they interpret in light of). That is because both your (I am assuming) religion/worldview and my religion/worldview includes a belief in logical reasoning/ laws of logic, the success of science, and other unseen, unobservable things. Our philosophical worldview in which we interpret the world is based in our religion. To say you do not have a worldview is a worldview in itself (just like saying "I don't have an opinion" is in itself an opinion, or "I'm an Atheist" is a belief on theism). To disagree with this is in itself a worldview. You cannot come with a "neutral" worldview because believing you are neutral is different than other beliefs (which teach there is no neutrality), and is therefore non-neutral. This is the nature of debates. Your position vs mine. Your belief vs mine. Our beliefs and positions are different, and only one can be correct. I believe in Christianity, you believe in Atheism. Now we take our two positions, and see where they lead to ultimately. Where does Atheism lead, and where does Christianity lead. I will use the Laws of logic in my examples. Which includes the law of non-contradiction. We both believe in laws of logic. Without logic, debates are impossible. Debates even assume logic exists. So we both must believe in logical reasoning, which is non-material. Now, why does logic exist? Why is it the way it is? According to Christianity, God cannot deny Himself (2 Tim. 2:13) and all truth is in God (John 14:6; Col. 2:3), therefore truth will not contradict itself. Logic is God's nature. "Laws of logic are God's standard for thinking. Since God is an unchanging, sovereign, immaterial Being, His thoughts would be necessarily be abstract, universal, invariant entities. In other words, they are not made of matter, they apply everywhere, and at all times. Laws of logic are contingent upon God's unchanging nature. And they are a prerequisite for logical reasoning. Thus, rational reasoning would be impossible without the biblical God." -Dr. Jason Lisle From my position, the basis of logic is in God. We couldn"t have logic without the Biblical God. Logic presupposes the Biblical God. If Atheism where true, why would logic exist? Atheism doesn't believe in the immaterial, and therefor contradicts logic. If Atheism was true, then logic wouldn't exist the way it does now. If Christianity was true, logic would exist. We must take both religions to their ultimate conclusion. The very definition of logic presupposes the biblical God. The only way to argue against it is to use logic, which proves the bible and not atheism, and ultimately proves God's existence. Atheism can"t explain Laws of Logic. Christianity can. The only way to prove me wrong is to use logic, which proves me right. Also, hypothetically, if atheism was true, then why are contradictions always false? You may believe that they are, but Atheism has no reason why logic exists. There is no God in Atheism, so why do such laws exist? Why do immaterial laws of logic that govern the universe exist? Indeed they do exist, their existence isn't in question. But if Atheism was true, why would contradictions be always false? The answer is, we wouldn't know. It would be impossible to know. If God doesn't exist, how can we guarantee a contradiction could never happen? Without God, what upholds logic? In a chance universe, why would logic be consistent? You couldn't know. Therefore, logical reasoning wouldn't be guaranteed. That would undermine all of reasoning. Then you couldn"t know anything, because you couldn"t guarantee the law of non-contradiction. If you say Christianity is false, then you forfeit logic. You must first believe in logic in order to use it. Religion is nessicary for logical reasoning. Christianity is the only self-consistent explanation. Atheism is a faulty religion, because it can"t guarantee or explain logic. If it was true, then why do we have laws of logic? Logic presupposes the Biblical God. Therefore, my religion is true and God exists. The only way to argue against my position is to use logic, which can only absolutely exist if Christianity was true. To argue for Atheism is to argue for a belief that cannot correctly explain logic. God exists, life has meaning, and Christianity is true. If you disagree, then you disagree. But logic presupposes the Bible. If you disagree, you must use logic, and will therefore prove me right and Atheism wrong. Now we get back to the original topic, that "the i dont know position means, i know its false" You don't know if contradictions are always false. Yet you believe they are. The reason you believe in logic, although contrary to Atheism, is because you are created in God's image. You support an illogical position. My position is correct. Vote for con, because pro is illogical in all of his standpoints. The "I don't know" position (as seen in the debate topic) means "I don't know", not "I know it's false".