Artificial Intelligence will kill us all

To the first paragraph: I reject that these statements are even. On species dying has exponentially more variables to one person dying. To the second paragraph: I don't mean this to be insulting, But your description of how AI works is entirely inaccurate. Programs can only do what they're programmed to do. It is impossible for them to give themselves knew programming unless they were already programmed to do it. You also don't understand how commands work with AI either. The AI does not get a broad function like "delete all spam" Each action would have it's own function. This means it would have to, Locate the computer with hardware. Move up to it. Use hardware to scan the webpage and get to emails, Which would require a complex series of commands that allows it to flip and then judge webpages to get to emails. Then it has to finally use hardware to find the delete button and press it. It is plain to see that these individual commands do not apply to "deleting humans". Furthermore, The AI does not have the option to change this code around. The only way this program command could kill humans, Was in the scientist who made it programmed it to start of delecting spam and then slowly evolve it self to kill humans. Which means it was programmed to kill humans the whole time. There is literally nothing that the program can do without the programmers knowing. To the third paragraph This paragraph relies on your spam reference from earlier, So it's debunked by default. Furthermore. The "goal" you speak of has to come from the programmer. It's true that the intelligence is orthogonal, But it doesn't matter because the goal never changes. If the goal was programmed to change, Then the goal was to change the goal. You see the problem here? This all draws back to the inevitable truth. AI can only cause extinction if we program it too. If you accept that. Then we have to take away all dangerous weapons on earth, Because your argument would be that humans are the ultimate problem. To the fourth paragraph This is false. If you understood how if statements worked in coding, You would know that a restriction cannot be disobeyed unless, And here it is again, The programmers program it to do so. To the fifth paragraph This is also false. It could only do it if it was programmed to do it. Furthermore, Being an AI doesn't automatically give it access to the worlds computers. It still would get stopped by firewalls and VPNs just like a person and it could never launch nukes because those are on a private system because the government is not quite that stupid. Even if the AI did drop the internet. We could just create a new network with brand new types of scripts that the AI wouldn't know and the AI would never be able to know it unless a person updated it, Which means that people are the problem, Not AI. You said before that nobody ever gave you a good argument against this. Are you sure about that? I think that you might be a little too incredulous towards the critiques, Because I haven't even got halfway through all the proofs I could present. I simply did it this way because if I start writing lines of code we're all gonna fall asleep.