Nations would benifit from using Tridemism as their political philosophy

I Did not go off topic at all, I contended that Trideism is the inferrior choice and I laid out the reasons why quite clearly. But for your sake, I will repeat why the system is obsolete and niot fit for nations in this century. I am sorry, but I worded it that way for a reason. If I said " Nations should adopt Tridemism", then you would be correct to bring up a new system. I worded it so you can only refute mine, because people kept doing this. As i said above, every one has an opinion and in democracy we "vote on it"... Look at the Gobal warming issue in the United states and how long it took us to get over science denial by conservative elements. I repeat my earlier statements, It does not matter how much a people deny science- science is true regardless. You can Vote all you want but the opinion of the majority doesn't change anything in the real world. Democracy is an outdated system, designed to meet the needs of people who lived in a low energy civilization which was in the midst of a technological revolution that brought us into the industrial era and the eventual end of the colonial age.We have it for a reason though. Because one side is not always right, and it is essential that everybody gets a fair and equal say in government. While a council of scientists sounds great, scientists are not always right on everything, just due to their status. What if the people who believed in Global Warming were a minority. That is why we need democracy.There is no way the children fo the future will be localized in this way. Already on our generations you see far less respect for nations and their borders, everythign about our culturue underminds the idea of having imaginary lines people that cannot or should be crossed. You music is global, our news is global, our movies and sdhows are global. Everythign about the 21st century culture is global and there is no room for artifical bounderies between people in that culture. Nationalism is detrmental to our society and serves only to slow down progress of a unified culture. Nationalism unites ethnic groups. It creates work ethic. People want to aid their nation, and make it the best it can be. Without nationalism, we would be divided and less efficient. I can not tell you about the future, but nationalism is beneficial now. its a wonderful concept but Trideism is woefully inadequate to proporarly meet the needs of its people. The very anture of being a democratic national system puts it at cross purposes between serving people and the industries which power the nation. The "vote" must be considered ablong side the economic system with out these three systems being intrinsically atached. Its like playing 3 way table pong. And I would love to hear how pure capitalism with socio guiadance is ineffective. Its worked well for the US and Taiwan. Taiwan is extrmely well off for all its citizens, so how can you make accusations it does not work? During the US progressive era, we made some of the biggest economic advances in history, and tridemism got us out of the great depression. http://www.taiwan-agriculture.org...http://www.heritage.org...Conclusion- My opponent has spent the first two rounds arguing on a off topic future system, while making few arguments that debate the resolution. "Nations would benefit from Tridemism". The resolution is worded in such a way that eliminates bringing up new resolutions.Thanks for the debate, and thanks for reading audience.