The American military budget should not be reduced

First I'd like to apologize for the multiple day delay. I'm not sure if anyone else had this problem but i couldn't access debate.org for several days, and now the interface seems distorted. Anyways, thank you for accepting. The United States military is beyond any doubt the most well funded military in the world. In 2016 the United States spent $580 Billion on defense, where as China, the country with the worlds second most well funded military, spent just $146 Billion. We can dig even deeper, and find the United States spend more on it"s military than the next eight countries combined. Not to even mention our massive number of Aircraft Carriers, and overseas bases. [1] [2] [3] This is all true. But simple number comparisons are just too... simple. If we are too debate this then we must ask ourselves... WHY is the budget this large? Where is this money going? What is unique about the American military capabilities, as compared to other countries? And how does it help America more than it hurts us? For my opening arguments i hope to help explain these very questions to demonstrate why it is necessary. One thing I've always found interesting, when i researched any data on the US military is how unique the American Navy and Air force are compared to other countries. For instance if we compare the US, China, and Russia's capabilities, to each other we get some interesting numbers. Fighter jets by country [4] Russia-806 China-1,271 USA- 2,296 The US has more than both countries combined. We see similar numbers with nearly every aspect of Naval/Air warfare Destroyers by country [4] Russia- 15 China- 35 USA- 63 Aircraft Carriers by country [4] Russia-1 China-1 USA- 19 (if you include LHA/LHD) Unfortunately i can't include everything from my source, but if you go to [4] and flip through the Naval/Air figures, it is clear the US has a strong advantage over our adversaries in these areas, with the exception of certain ships such as frigates/mine warfare/ and coastal patrol craft. However the US chooses not to invest very much in these ships anyways, due to their inherently coastal nature. However something interesting happens when you look at land systems Tanks by country [4] USA-5,884 China-6,457 Russia- 20,216 Self propelled artillery by country [4]- China-1,710 USA-1,934 Russia- 5,972 Now the point of my message isn't too say that our Army is ineffective, or even that it needs more funding. My point is that this goes a long way in demonstrating where the American Military's priorities lie. It is clear America want's to have control over Naval and Air spaces. Much more so than any other country. I apologize if it took me a while to get too my point, but ultimately the reason for these numbers is because the United States military has the intention of establishing "Command of the Commons". For those who don't know, Command of the Commons, is when one country has established sufficient control over the worlds trade routes and economic areas. Think back to World War 2, and the devastation German U-Boats caused the British. The British frequently suffered supply, and food shortages due to their dependence on trade. The current American strategy is built around establishing control over these trade routes. This allows us to protect our merchant ships, while simultaneously, threaten adversaries trade during times of war. Unfortunately however... this requires money. Lots of it. Having a global military presence is very expensive. But it is worth it, as it allows us to safeguard our economy. Now unfortunately i was gonna show some pictures, and maps to demonstrate my point, but i can't seem to figure out how to do that. So instead consider where our bases are located. (I really wish i could have had a map for this) If you scroll through the internet and happen to find a map yourself, you will notice that there are generally two types of overseas military bases. 1.) Bases in Countries we frequently trade with, such as Germany Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Australia, various Eastern European Countries, etc. 2.) Countries near "Naval Choke points" such as Turkey, Bahrain, Italy Spain, Japan, South Korea, etc. [5] [6] [7] I don't wish to sound rude to certain people when i say this, but when you think about it, we don't really have any large military presence in poor countries. (Except maybe Afghanistan). We do have a few hundred soldiers in various South American, and African countries. But this presence is very small. Japan, and Germany have the two largest foreign American bases in them, and they are two very important trade partners. I think a question people often forget to ask during these kinds of debates is "Can we afford NOT to have such a well funded military?" If our allies and trade partners are threatened... does that not threaten our economy? If certain Naval choke points (which contain significant amounts of merchant traffic), are threatened, then will that not threaten us? 90% of the worlds trade occurs by sea. That's 90% of our imports and exports. During the Iran-Iraq war only a few decades ago, numerous merchant ships from various countries were attacked and sunk by both sides. This had such an effect on the American economy, that US warships were sent to the Persian gulf to escort Allied merchant ships. This was known as "The Tanker War". By the end of the conflict hundreds of ships were sunk including two American ships. [8] You see countries like Russia, and China do not have these global capabilities. They simply can't afford them. China's GDP is half the size of America's and Russia has a GDP smaller than California. This puts them at a significant disadvantage. If such a conflict such as the Tanker War were to happen again, they would struggle to do anything about it. Especially if it was far away from their own country. Now i know you may be thinking that i spent too much time talking about where our military is, or why we do what we do, and not enough about money itself. But that's also my point. Our military logistics capabilities far exceed that of any other country, allowing us to protect our economic interest on a global scale. But we also have to be able to pay the bill. Because defending the United States doesn't always mean protecting our soil. It also means protecting our assets . It means protecting our economy. The United States and our Allies have collectively put ourselves in a very powerful position. A position to safeguard our economic interests for many many years. It is expensive... yes. But honestly ask... can we afford NOT too? [1] http://comptroller.defense.gov... [2] http://chinapower.csis.org... [3] http://www.pgpf.org... [4] http://www.globalfirepower.com... [5] https://www.stripes.com... [6] https://www.airforce.com... [7] https://qz.com... [8] https://www.usni.org...