Earth is flat

Pikes peak is visible, in it's entirety, from sea level at Ft Collins, which is 140 miles away. If we use this information and refer to our chart above, we can see that at 140 miles we get roughly 3 miles of curvature, which translates to about 16,000 ft. So according to the globular earth theory, anything lower than this should not be visible. Also notice how it is nearly the same color as the sky above it, this is due to smog, fog, heat, dust, or any combination of particles in the air that blocks light from coming through altogether. It is due to these (law of perspective and atmosphere) that we cannot see forever. Binoculars will help overcome the law of perspective to a degree, but not the atmosphere without some thermal imaging to help, to a degree. Conclusion voters, does it seem like most, if not all of this mountain is hidden over the horizon? Or does it just shrink, due to the law of perspective? This is obvious, empirical evidence. So, using the calculations provided, we can safely conclude that we are seeing much farther than we should, and that the earth is either flat, or much larger that we are told. My opponent claims that pressure, due to gravity, is pushing (or is it pulling out) the top layer of earth outwards, as It is holding the world's oceans, people, ATMOSPHERE, tightly to it's surface, while the moon is spinning around it. Gravity is not reproduceable on a small scale. Water cannot stick to a ball against centrifugal force. Gravity was invented, not discovered, to make the spherical earth theory work, they are accurate on paper, but this is because some of the greatest freemason (or freemason persuaded) minds reversed the math to make it work. Gravity is constant, applied equally to everything proportional to it's mass, then the tennis ball should hold water to it's surface when spun, but it obviously doesn't, this should raise a red flag in and of itself. Gravity is the equivalent to religion's God, nobody can prove it actually exists, so we just have to take the preachers word for it.From Universe today: "...physicists think about gravity all the time. To them, gravity is one of the mysteries to be solved in order to get a complete understanding of how the Universe works. So, what is gravity and where does it come from? To be honest, we’re not entirely sure." Com drops his argument after I proved his video was using a fisheye lens, as this is the only proof of curvature that con offers and it is successfully rebutted, then dropped, and no new evidence may be presented in round 5, we must conclude that there are no videos or photos of the Earth's curvature that exists which aren't faked, if boats go over the horizon at 3 miles, and a balloon can reach upwards of 100,000 feet, then we should be able to see some curvature, and Horizon should drop with altitude.Conclusion: empirical evidence shows that the Earth is flat. "because larger objects (such as the planet) have a gravitational pull much stronger than the moon and so objects end up orbiting the larger object"Then our moon should not be orbiting us, but the sun. The same scenario could be reproduced with distances and sizes relatively scaleable to the earth/sun. It matters because the moon's location should be nearly opposite Nevada on a globe, yet we see it well above the horizon, again, I hope the voters understand the reasoning behind this argument, and that the moon shouldn't be so small, considering it hasn't gone relatively far away. Con has dodged this argument since it was brought up, but it's not that complicated to understand, and it is proof that the earth is not a ball. " I don't understand what my opponent means with the second sentence/question and request that he/she is more clear in general." since the moon orbits the earth, and the moon is following it, if a craft is free of this friction, they should be able to come to a stop (lose all of it's velocity), predict the moon's trajectory, and wait for the moon or other destination which is travelling around the sun at 18 mps to come to them.Con drops the gyroscope argument as well. This is empirical evidence that the earth does not spin, making gravity nonexistent, and with it, the globe.Con drops the flight paths argument after I brought up the precious globe he defends. As common sense will tell anyone who paid attention, we should not make stops in the nothern hemisphere on such a southerly flight, these points, should be closer together on a globe, not far enough away to cause any northerly paths. As this flight path can easily be explained in a flat earth, it is proof that the earth is not a globe. 1. What level of deception? Seriously? They fabricated pictures of the earth, and put it in our heads. This is the highest level of deception. I consider this to be THE Great Deception mentioned in the bible. I can't definitely prove that they didn't but I see that they were all royalty or prominent members of society and more than likely freemason. I will point out that they are unsure where the south pole is actually located, so how do they know the just didn't get turned around?2. A huge cavern of liquid fire commonly known as hell3. Newtonian laws state that an object that orbits another is relative to it's distance from the objects being orbited. Meaning that if the object's distance is increased, it's gravitational force should decrease, and vice versa. So elliptical orbits, which are common thoughout the universe, should be breaking these "laws". What force pulls the planet back out to it's furthest point in it's orbit? Scientists claim it's velocity and centripital force, but as gravity is growing, this velocity should also be growing to counter it. This will lead to eventual collision of the objects. 4. I too googled this and found this seemingly reasonable explanation. There are obvious differences though. 1. Train tracks start at the observer's feet and are moving away. When you see this in the distance, you can see it from a side view, so you are seeing the actual angles, not receding parallel lines. 2. You can sometimes see rays going backwards in the verticle scale, as the sun is supposedly 93 Brazillian miles away, this would be impossible. please from now on, don't just gobble up whatever round earth science tells you regardless of how silly it sounds, or what your eyes are clearly seeing. Realize they have been doing this for a long time.You may not can see the boundaries because of the cognitive dissonance, but I'm sure everyone else can, but it's ok, I want you to see it too, so let's apply a flare filter. https://youtu.be...So you can see, with this math, that is absolute, that the sun is not 93 Brazilian miles away, and it circles above our heads.5. Not intentionally. The weight differences are insignificant and I suspect, non-existent6.The earth is the only physical terra firma we can prove with empirical evidence. Pictures from nasa are cgi as I showed in the debate I provided at the beginning of round 2. There is no reason we should think that lights in the sky are other places you can go or even touch. God made the earth, and the firmament shows his handi-work. Again, earth is a flat, round, disc, not a globe. See the comments section for a link on why the moon is not a sphere.(people on one side of the globe do not see more of it than people looking at it from a different angle on the opposite side of the globe.)I was going to edit out some of the above to make room for the last questions, but I feel it might take away from the proof, that is my burden, that I feel my opponent all but ignores, drops, or (pretends not to?) doesn't understand. The most importantly being the empirical evidences with unaided high altitude shots, gyroscopes, being able to see further distances than allowed, etc. These are undeniable. I also would like to add that it was an engineer/physics teacher that first turned me on to the flat earth theory. His name is Brian mullin and you can find him on YouTube.