RyuuKyuzo should be allowed in the DDO Debating League

Before diving into my arguments, humor me and my introductory gaiety. This is the most excited I've ever been for a debate on this site. This debate will be different from all my other debates in that in this debate I'm not just looking to win, but I am looking for my opponent to actually be convinced of my position and come to agree with it. If all goes well, this debate will end early with Con conceding. I want it to be acknowledged that Stephen_Hawkins is the first person I've challenged to a debate in the forums to actually accept. He has earned my respect thusly. Burden of proof accepted and my last-round skip is agreed upon.Now, without further delay, I present to you my arguments.________________________________________________________________________________________________=======No "Good" Debates=======My first argument will be against the claim Con has made that I don't deserve to be in the league due to my lack of "good" debates. It is my contention that I have, indeed, had "good" debates. I would argue that all my debates, at least from my end, are good debates as I do not post any arguments that I do not feel are thorough and concise. If con agrees with me that this is the case, then he should absolutely allow me in to the DDO league. Furthermore, I have indeed had debates that can be said to be "good" from both ends [1][2][3]. "Good" is ultimately subjective, but in any case these debates show that I am indeed a formidable debater who can more than handle well researched and well presented arguments against me.Perhaps these debates aren't as "good" as Con would like, but that brings me to another point that I will outline in point 3.=======Not for Lack of Trying=======It's no secret that I am quick to challenge people to debates in the forums. Virtually everyone who knows me on this site can vouch for that (and I encourage you to do so if you feel so inclined). The problem isn't that I'm avoiding good debates. To the contrary, the issue is that nobody else before now has been willing to debate me (with the excepting of DeFool, but that debate never happened due to an out-of-debate resolution occurring). To illustrate the point, here are some examples:a) In the thread titled "Why are you voting for Obama?", I issued a challenge to user LeafRod on the topic of race and IQ [4]. He declined.It's worth noting that I went on to open this challenge to anyone in the thread. No takers.b) In the same thread, I challenged user 000Ike to a debate on the topic of voting based spite vs. race [5]. He declined.c) In the very first thread I ever created, I challenged user tarkovsky to debate me on the nature of "things" vs. "events [6]". He declined. These challenges of mine have also been issued in the comments sections of debates:d) In one of my debates' comments sections, I challenged user truthseeker613 to debate me on the topic of Israel-American relations [7]. No response.e) In RoyLatham's debate on the 2012 presidential election, I challenged user DeFool to a debate on was was, in my opinion, a questionable RFD [8]. He agreed, but for reasons outlined in the comments section, this debate never happened.It should be noted that, at the time of this, DeFool is also undefeated. I have more examples, but I've made my point.=======Purpose of the League=======Con has outlined 3 reasons for the existence of this league [9];1) An easy way of setting up a lot of debates against good members2) A way of recording the debates against good members3) The best way of seeing how good you are at debating compared to the best of the best.Note that the very first point is to allow for the set-up of good debaters vs. good debaters. I want to debate good debaters, but good debaters aren't the ones usually issuing debates -- and when they do it's either on a topic that I already agree with them on or a topic that I am too ignorant of to be a good debating partner myself. Other times, someone simply beats me to the punch [10].This league is specifically designed for the purpose of helping people in my situation. Everyone in the league right now has the same problem as me (not enough "good" partners), the only difference is that I haven't been on as long as most of the current members and therefore haven't had as much opportunity to rack up a large repertoire of "good" debates (I only have 21 in total so far, mind you). Essentially the circumstances are as such that I can't join because I don't have strong debating partners, but I don't have strong debating partners because I can't join. I suppose I could set up some sort of group of strong debating partners in order to have these debates -- but then again one already exists -- the DDO league. This is not by any means an exhausted list, but my character count is coming to a close and so I'll end prima facie case now.=======Conclusion=======I have established that I am, in fact, a debater skilled enough to be in this league (not to sound conceded, this is simply what I have to argue here) and I have much to offer the group. At this point I have engaged in 21 debates and I invite the voters to check them all out personally to see that I do, indeed, always make strong, well-stated arguments regardless of my opponent's experience or conduct within the debate. Whenever I find myself in a confrontation in the forums (and elsewhere) I am always quick to press the option of debating the issue, it is merely the case that Con is the only one to really accept. Essentially, the only real argument for keeping me out of this league is that I haven't had many strong debating partners, a point which has nothing to do with my debating skill and also is a problem that would be fully rectified by granting me membership in this league. At this point I hope I have convinced not only the voters, but the other league members as well as my opponent himself that I should be in this league. If not, I have many more bullets in my chamber. I look forward to your response.=======Sources=======1. http://debate.org...2. http://debate.org... 3. http://debate.org... 4. http://www.debate.org... 5. http://www.debate.org... 6. http://www.debate.org... 7. http://www.debate.org... 8. http://www.debate.org... 9. http://www.debate.org... 10. http://www.debate.org...