RESOLVED: Homeschooling is better than Public Schooling.

I thank CASmnl42 for debating with me on this topic.In this last speech for the PRO, I will isolate the main arguments brought up by the con and address them. I will then go over three main "voting issues" as to why all the readers should vote for the pro.ARGUMENT ONE: ACADEMIC The main point brought up by the con was that all studies I have provided were subject to "unrepresentative sampling". While this may be true for one isolated study, all of them combined level out inequalities.There is a method in science where a test is done multiple times, and the results are averaged. The more times the test is done, the more accurate the end result will be. This averaging levels out inequalities and experimental error.In the same way, although one homeschooling study may be flawed, when all of the studies which provided in round two, and all the studies provided in round three, and even more out there that I have not cited, are observed, almost every single one of them shows the same thing: Homeschoolers are more intelligent that Public Schoolers.Therefore, this "unrepresentative sampling" problem is a non-issue. There is simply too much data out there to deny it.ARGUMENT TWO: SOCIALThe two main arguments brought up by the con was (1) unrepresentative sampling, and (2) the HARO resourcesAs I said before, the "unrepresentative sampling" is a non-issue.As for the HARO resources, as I was looking at the web page provided by the con, I found this page: https://hareachingout.wordpress.com...What I saw was that there are five writers of this HARO blog. And all these resources are simply things that the five writers think homeschooling alumni might need. In fact, they probably were "casting the net wide" in an effort to cover any and all problems that had any chance to surface.This point then, is not an issue.ARGUMENT THREE: ORIGINThe main argument brought up by the con was that homeschooling in America is a "spearpoint of a frightening ideology that should be opposed". He made the point that a certain Mr. R.J. Rushdoony was the father of modern American homeschooling and he said that homeschooling was a form of dominionism and totalitarianism.This, however, is not true.When I told my "just-so story", I wasn't making a debating point about how good homeschooling was, I was simply highlighting the origins of homeschooling and public schooling. The main reason that my "sources are utterly inadequate" is that I assumed that everyone knew this fact: homeschooling was the first form of education in America.http://www.synergyfield.com...http://en.wikipedia.org...(I know, Wikipedia isn't credible. I just included it because it is easier to read than the other source. They both say the same thing.)These two show one important point: Homeschooling is not, in fact, a form of dominionism and totalitarianism. It is actually the initial way that humans taught their children before the public education system came about.So we see that the con's point is not true. Homeschooling is not a "spearpoint of a frightening ideology that should be opposed". It is, in fact, the best source of education available to mankind!Now that I have addressed the points brought up by the con, I would now like to provide two "voting issues", reasons why the readers should vote pro. Please note that I am not bringing up new arguments, I am simply highlighting the main arguments and rebuttals that have run through this debate, and crystallizing them for the ease of reading.VOTING ISSUE ONE: NON-ISSUESBasically, all arguments brought up by my opponent have been along this vein: "There is no reliable evidence for the superiority of homeschooling". He very rarely, if ever, brought up evidence for the superiority of public schooling. I understand that he is allowed to do this as con, since the burden of proof is on me.However, I have shown that (1) the "representative sampling" problem is a non-issue, (2) the HARO resource is a non-issue, (3) the "Homeschooling is a frightening ideology" idea is a non-issue, and (4) the homeschooling abuse probem is a non-issue [I proved this is round 3]All the evidence that con has presented , I have shown to be invalid. Therefore, let's look at what I have proven.VOTING ISSUE TWO: HOMESCHOOLING EVIDENCEThere is overwhelming evidence in favor of homeschooling. in the previous rounds, I have proven that Homeschoolers are intellectually and socially superior to public schoolers, and my opponent has not been able to show otherwise.Therefore, homeschooling is superior.All data points unerringly toward one conclusion, and therefore, I stand RESOLVED: Homeschooling is better than Public Schooling.I thank CASmnl42 for debating with me. It has been very entertaining and enlightening. I look forward to your final rebuttal. Good luck in the voting period!