BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
CHRISTIANITY vs ATHEISM

First, I would like to point out my opponents misspellings: "My opponent claims that many atheist became atheist becouse they don't like gods rule . Nut that is simply " I would also like to point out you are an athiest, not an athirst. "I'm an athirst" My opponenet also brought up the point "I gave it up to only believing what I see" You mean to tell me you don't believe in gravity? You can't see that. You can't feel, taste, touch, or smell it. Yet, we believe that it's there. So, if you believe in only the things you see, you don't believe in gravity, oxygen, or other galexies? You don't believe that I'm an actual person because you can't see me? My opponent wrote this: "if there was hardcore evidence for god I would easily believe in him" My answer: Theos is the Greek word for God, therefore a theist believes in God and sees God as the creator. A- is the Greek prefix meaning absence, therefore an atheist believes in the absence of God. To them, everything can be explained by natural causes and effects. This worldview elimiates the possibility of God, therefore no evidence will ever be satisfying or convincing. The only option is for them to start seeking God themselves. Also, in the acceptance round, you stated that you would prove that your religion was "easier"... I fail to see how atheism is easier. Is it easier because you have nothing to live for? Is it easier because you don't have any moral standereds? Please, explain. If there is an anthem of non-belief, it is no doubt the song Imagine by John Lenon: "Imagine there's no heaven..." Is that true? Would the world be a better place if there were no God? Let us imagine.If there is no heaven, then there is no God. If there is no God or heaven, then this life is all there is: when you're dead, you're dead. What Lenon imagined, Vladimir Lenin had already built in communist Russia. The godless world of that Lenin was filled with tortue, genocide, and darkness. The twentith century was the bloodiest century in history, thanks to the atheistic views of Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao Zedong. However, there is a God. And if there is a God, there is a heaven. And if there is a heaven, there is life after death to those who accept it.
CHRISTIANITY vs ATHEISM

My opponent claims that many atheist became atheist becouse they don't like gods rule . Nut that is simply not the case here are some reasons why people are atheist Intellectual Most atheists would offer some of the following arguments as their reason for deciding that God doesn't exist. Non-Intellectual Many people are atheists because of the way they were brought up or educated, or because they have simply adopted the beliefs of the culture in which they grew up. So someone raised in Communist China is likely to have no belief in God because the education system and culture make being an atheist the natural thing to do. Other people are atheists because they just feel that atheism is right. With your augment about the churches I got nothing I'm confused . Okay before I go ahead let me just say I'm an athirst who was born from intellect I was born a Catholic but as I grew older I had a hard time keeping my religion so I gave it up to only believing what I see and what has evidence to prove it if there was hardcore evidence for god I would easily believe in him
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

Is it correct to utilize facilities ,restrooms, washrooms, dressing rooms, bathrooms irregardless of one's gender but according to how a person feels about themselves? Anyone up that holds the stance that it is correct and believes there is nothing wrong or faulty with elective gender identification, please step forward. You are cordially invited to participate in a very informative debating session. You will have a chance to explain if you can on how elective gender indentification is more logical than natural , physical , anatomical gender identification. There will not be a fixated or strict structured debate. Anything goes and no research is required, although solid facts can be provided as well. The person/opponent can completely go off of their opinion. They are free to express what they truly believe or what makes sense to them , so forth and so on. Be prepared to be challenged on anything at anytime on any statement presented. Most of all, expect to grow in knowledge, that's hopefully gained from both sides. It'll be the most constructive part of it all , ultimately.
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

"Should a child be influenced to figure out what their gender is ?" No, but in the case that you ste about the laws being repealed to support the bathroom usage, I believe that they are only repealing them to agree that the laws are discriminatory when rea;;y is trying to influence the safety of transgenders and prevent the rates of rape from increasing. I expect the results of the "elective gender identity behavior" to influence government officials to make laws that not necessarily restrict gender transformation surgeries but control how frequent they can occur.
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

Mind over physical matter or makeup is not a theory , it's a reality . How else would it be that one's mentalitity is out of sync with their body? Have a mind with masculine thoughts with a female person or body . Likewise , one would have a mind with feminine thoughts with a male person or body. That's total perplexity and it's to the zone where that being can't get any more confused than that. They have reached maximum confusion . Now in reference to children . Should a child be influenced to figure out what their gender is ? Which in ways of discovering it or should the child be taught and programmed from day one with the capability of comprehension what their gender is? Next, what do you expect the result to be of all this elective gender identity behavior? Do you see more laws getting passed to support this matter of bathroom usage for either side , either sex or the reverse? More laws getting repealed . Will sex change operations be as frequent as cavity filling procedures?
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

What I personally think of your "mind over physical matter" theory is that the mind can tell your body what you are in regards to your gender identity, but as I stated before, Your chromosomes and genetic makeup technically make up who you are and what your gender is. But in regards to your statement about "Small children that don't even have a full concept of sexuality are being saturated with the notion and behavior of deviating the true sexual identity ", I would agree that the way that small children learn from older generations because of their behavior. But when it comes to gender identity, A child could be influenced to figure out their gender identity or possibly
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

In that case, why do you think people believe they can overwrite that genetic makeup based on how they feel? Where does it stem from and can this be the ultimate argument on how homosexuality is botched in the same way? As we can see ,sexuality is taken out of order and people attractions shift on how they gender identify. Whether a male that feels like a female is attracted to another male and vice-versa. We can see an ever continuing pattern of mind over physical matter. As the goverment amends the laws of the land, they accomodate more on visceral terms. Excluding more and more of the facts and the correct order of things. This "mind over physical matter " as I call it is being brought on to small children. Small children that don't even have a full concept of sexuality are being saturated with the notion and behavior of deviating the true sexual identity . I remember at one time, small children played and acted as their parents. Maybe the boy would try on the mother's high heel shoes, etc. That was treated as cute, playful and innocent. Now I've seen interviews about parents supporting these behaviors as reality in terms of sensible life long behaviors and not just simple child's play . What do you think about all that?
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

So basically the way you see it, it is incorrect to have a mind of the opposite gender that does not match up to the person's physical make up . As mentioned , it is not right to force persons to go along with the way one or others feel. Also it is what is considered violation of a person's privacy and rights, a person can feel strongly against sharing facilities with individuals who are phyiscally the inappropriate sex to use the facility such as a restroom. For instance, a woman that works as a waitress can firmly make a legal case that they will not share a restroom, locker room, etc. with men who feel and behave like they are women. The woman can make a case against the freedom of gender identification. A mother can make a similar case with her five year old daughter not wanting her to use the same bathroom with little boys that are encouraged by their parents to wear dresses. Once we get away from a strict criteria , theres nothing to keep us from getting lost into confusion. So once more, are you pointing out that genetically, our genders are fixated, determined and ongoing no matter the outward appearance, is that right?
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

Well, as a witness said in the comments "No one should not be able to FORCE others to go along with something they "feel." Just because they mutilate their bodies, they still have the same chromosomes they had at birth. Therefore, a man is still a man and woman is still a woman, no matter how they feel. A man who now has a vagina should not be allowed to force women to share a bathroom with him, and expect them to be comfortable with that." The decisions that a transgender makes is not fully complete because of the original chromosomes that they were given .
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

"Transgenders need to realize that just because they alter themselves to the opposite sex doesn't mean that it will change their moral way of life and the way that they were originally created.": This statement is not relative to the topic . Is it correct to utilize facilities ,restrooms, washrooms, dressing rooms, bathrooms irregardless of one's gender but according to how a person feels about themselves? This question is not relating to God and transgenders , etc. It's understood about how a person may feel or that they believe " it's how God made them". However, the subject here is that a person that wishes to use the ladie's restroom for instance is a physical man that was born a male, is it correct to ignore factual biology and the man adheres to how he perceives his gender? Which in this case he believes he is an actual woman. On the subject of transgenders, it's not so cut and dry. It's not much of a factor to determine on the dividing line or blurred line of do's and dont's in that it can be a very broad range in terms of physical makeup . But what's in question are specific distinct sexes that are clearly seen to belong to each of their gender identifications. They think, feel and act in opposite of their femininity (women) as vice versa with masculinity (men). So is it correct to behave and act according to one's physical, anatomical sex or is it more logical and correct to conduct one's self according to the nature of one's mind? If so, please explain , in terms of common sense, principles, everyday life.
Gender Identity : It's correct to use facilities,restrooms etc, w/o regard to sex but how one feels

I am looking forward to this debate. My first statments open as this. Transgenders need to realize that just because they alter themselves to the opposite sex doesn't mean that it will change their moral way of life and the way that they were originally created. It also affects that God had created them because of the gender that God gave to them. Other than religious beliefs, There are more risks and dangers to transgenders that halt their sense of security and stability. Those who disagree with God's way of creating you and alter themselves are basically giving no regard to His original creation. Also on the other hand, I don't understand why everyone is focused on transgenders, Why not focus on other issues such as unemployment and veteran affairs. The HB2 bill in North Carolina kind of makes clear sense because you should be able to stick to your original gender.
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

https://www.google.com... https://www.google.com... https://www.google.com... My opponent obliviously lives in a self righteous bubble and not here on planet earth! Please examine these links to see that my opponent babbles! Most of God's people deny that He even exist! Joh_1:10, He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. Joh_1:11, He came unto his own, and his own received him not. My opponent asked me?: Where am I trying to go? My opponent posted: Second of all quoting the Bible is not getting you anywhere. How do you know that book is true and why should anyone believe in what it says? I willing to bet that you don't even know who wrote. I will take that bet! How much you got? Or are you babbling lying falsehoods out of the side of your neck? Because your mouth is not placed correctly on your head? Post your bet and test me? If I am clueless as who wrote what! Bring it on!!! Or just babble on!!!!!!!
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

Your first error is the debate title. First your stating that "atheists are wrong" and then you are switching the topic of the debate by talking about evolution and Darwin. (I highly doubt that you know who Charles Darwin is, but that's beside the point.) Atheism and evolution have nothing to do with each other. Thousands of theists believe in evolution. Second of all quoting the Bible is not getting you anywhere. How do you know that book is true and why should anyone believe in what it says? I willing to bet that you don't even know who wrote. References: No additional sources were used in this round
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

Rom_1:20, For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Rom_1:21, Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Rom_1:22, Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Rom_1:23, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Rom_1:24, Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Rom_1:25, Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

"I refute Darwin's IDEA that maggots grew to monkeys who turned to mathematicians who in turned, decided to started recording history!" You obviously have no idea of the scientific fact of evolution. Do you? No one is saying that maggots turned into moneys. But if they did, that might explain your stupidity. " My clueless speechless opponent has no argument, so he stole mine!" Your just trying to win votes, uh? I was trying to let you give your evidence of your god, which you do not have, and I was going give you the REAL evidence for evolution. "Who are you to tell me how to use the internet!" You are using bull crap from your computer with out giving it credit. "My bible is not on the internet! Duh!" Of course not. But I can tell you just copied and pasted from the internet. "My opponent did not explain why Jews evolved around God, unlike other people." I do not understand what your asking. Are you saying that the Jewish religion is the oldest religion in the world? Because that is false. "Why is USA the most powerful nation after only 200+ years! No other nations has done that!" It has nothing to do with religion because this is not a Christian nation. "Why is Israel regathered in Their Own land?" That region is mostly Muslim. "Why did not offer an explanation on Who the Root and Offspring of David is? And why Queen Elizabeth claims to fulfill the continuing of David's bloodline!" Do you have evidence?? "Rev_5:5, And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. Rev_22:16, I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." Your embarrassing yourself at this point. No wonder you have lost most of your debates. Congratulations! You have just lost a debate agents a 15 year old!
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

I refute Darwin's IDEA that maggots grew to monkeys who turned to mathematicians who in turned, decided to started recording history! My clueless speechless opponent has no argument, so he stole mine! Who are you to tell me how to use the internet! My bible is not on the internet! Duh! My opponent did not explain why Jews evolved around God, unlike other people. Why is USA the most powerful nation after only 200+ years! No other nations has done that! Why is Israel regathered in Their Own land? Why is the fight for God's Land and on going battle? Why did not offer an explanation on Who the Root and Offspring of David is? And why Queen Elizabeth claims to fulfill the continuing of David's bloodline! Rev_5:5, And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. Rev_22:16, I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. https://www.google.com...
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

"I refute the lie that I offered no proof. Because it is on your money. And the bible is in every hotel room in America=One Nation Under God! Catch a clue. Or babble on!" It does not matter how many people believe in your god. That provides NO prove. It does not matter how many many times his name is spread around. You have no evidence for your god. "Facts are there are no Nations with unicorns on the money, Who have the power that USA has = One Nation Under God!" So if a country had unicorns on their money then unicorns are real? What logic is that? Are you high? "Hey guess what USA has turned their back on God, God may and is turning against the people of USA! Can you say immigration reform? Let's give America to illegal immigrates? You should take your head out of your rear end and look around." Hey guess which religion has the majority in this nation! Christianity! And you can't say that a god has turned his back on us when you cant prove this god exists. "they came from Abraham who came from Adam who.............................you know the story!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" There is no historical evidence that neither of those figures ever existed. No matter how hard you believe or anyone else does. "Luk_3:38, Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God." Once more, stop plagiarizing bible verses off the internet.
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

I refute the lie that I offered no proof. Because it is on your money. And the bible is in every hotel room in America=One Nation Under God! Catch a clue. Or babble on! Facts are there are no Nations with unicorns on the money, Who have the power that USA has = One Nation Under God! Hey guess what USA has turned their back on God, God may and is turning against the people of USA! Can you say immigration reform? Let's give America to illegal immigrates? You should take your head out of your rear end and look around. Or continue to babble on! Or answer the questions on where Jews came from? Because according to YOU they came from Jewish parents!Who say they came from Abraham who came from Adam who.............................you know the story!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Luk_3:38, Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

Again my appointment has failed to provide real evidence for his god. "I ask the Darwin worshiper" I do not worship anyone or anything. I am an atheist "Why does my opponent lie more babbling about the bible? Hey WAKE UP!!!!!!! This debate is not about the bible. Please read the subject of the debate before babbling bull!" I keep bring up your holy book because you keep plagiarizing bible verses off the internet. You have not shown any evidence why anyone should take that book seriously. Therefore, your verses mean nothing. "I offer proof of God! #1 What is on your money? IN GOD WE TRUST" How is this evidence? If our money said, "In unicorns we trust" would that mean unicorns are real? No. Those words were not always on our money. They were add in the 1800's because of a religious trend. People used the bible to defend slavery. "Proof #2 USA=ONE NATION UNDER GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DUH?" If the pledge said "one nation under dragons" would that mean dragons are real? No. Those words, again, were not originally there. They were added in the 50's during another religious trend. " Proof #3 The Jewish people. Where did they come from?" That's a very stupid question. They came from their parents and their parents tough the Jewish religion to them. I'm beginning to believe you are not serious and just a prankster. I sure hope so. The thought of someone being this stupid...
Atheist are wrong! There is more proof that God exist rather than evolution! Darwin is WRONG!

My opponent is making NO compelling arguments. I've already explained that it is worthless to quote the Bible. Why should I take the bible seriously? "My opponent obliviously lives in a self righteous bubble and not here on planet earth!" The only one who is living in a bubble is not me, Sir. You have not stated any evidence for the existence of your god. (The Bible is NOT evidence)
do he desever a second chane

First off, you did not say that he cheated on you so how would I have known. secondly, talking to someone of a different gender is not "cheating" on your partner if that is what you are getting at. thirdly, is he your spouse or your boyfriend? I am confused over what your stating him as due to how you typed your response. Lastly, if he cheated on you why the poop are you still with him? that's the real question.
God Exists.

Burden of proof is on the believer. Definitions: God: "Creator and ruler of the universe, a being omnipotent, omniscient, perfect, and eternal." Exists: " To have objective reality or being." The believer will be arguing that God (any God) exists in objective reality, I will be arguing that he doesn't. Rules: 1. No forfeiting 2. No ad hominems Only accept if you accept the definitions and terms of the debate. Message me if interested.