Homosexuals who are intolerant of all homophobes are BIGOTS

"In this case all I have to do in this debate is to show that there is reason in said hatered or that homophobia is unreasonable or illogical then I would win the debate on these grounds. This is FALSE Homophobia is rooted in disgust and disgust is biologically reasonable because disgust is an evolutionary defense system which is still beneficial today. Since disgust is biologically reasonable, homophobia is biologically reasonable because homophobia is rooted in disgust. Homophobia rooted in disgust, not fear. (Olatunji et AL 2001) " Defending Disgust: Why Disgust Is Morally Beneficial (Jason A Clark)" http://emotionresearcher.com......; Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour (Valerie Curtis et al 2011)"Published 3 January 2011 doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0117"Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B"12 February 2011"vol. 366no. 1563"389-401 Disgust: the disease-avoidance emotion (Graham C. L. Davey 2011)" Published 31 October 2011 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0039 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 12 December 2011 vol. 366 no. 1583 "Homophobia- irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals [2]" Con's flawed logic fails to see that the broad definition of homophobia covers a wide range of behaviors. 1. 'Aversion to' ALONE is considered homophobia even if it's passively expressed.. 2. My premises includes ALL homophobes meaning passive and humble homophobes included. 3. "Discrimination", "prejudice" and "irrational fear" aren't required for homophobia since 'aversion to' could be expressed by quitely walking away, kindly avoiding friendship, kindly avoiding association, kindly avoiding hand shakes, kindly refusing to embrace homosexual behavior in the name of marriage, ect. 4. Regarding "irrational fear and the suffix "phobia", not even one person has been diagnosed with homophobia using the basic diagnostic criteria for all phobias . Better yet, the study I cited shows homophobia is not even rooted in fear. 5. Con fails to see that people's disgusts and dislikes are expressed in various ways. An 'aversion to' could be fueled by disgust in which could be passively expressed. "Now let's apply this to my opponent's Argument. By Homophobia's very definition it is prejudice and discrimination against gays." AGAIN, Discrimination", "prejudice" and "irrational fear" aren't required for homophobia since 'aversion to' in which could be fueled by disgust could be expressed by kindly avoiding friendship or kindly avoiding association "What reason could the homosexual community could have against the homophobes?" The homosexual community is intolerant of anyone who shows that they are disgusted by homosexual behavior even if it's passively expressed. Gays are intolerant and hateful towards a group of people simply because of evolutionary defense emotion. This clearly a case of BIGOTRY "Blacks who are intollerant against White Suppremisists are bigots" This is a FAULTY ANALOGY 1. Unlike homophobia, not even one study shows racism is rooted in disgust. Blacks are intolerant of racism. Gays are intolerant of a particular disgust even if it's passively expressed since homophobia is rooted in disgust. 2. Race and a sexual behavior are completely different. White supremasists are against a group of people regardless of their behavior. Homophobia is fueled by disgust of a specific behavior. 3. Using con's logic, hating and being intolerant of people for being disgusted by sex with animals is somehow not bigotry. The theories of John Rawls does not apply to people who passively express disgust of bestiality, incest, homosexuality, drinking urine, ect. On top of that, study shows disgust is an evolutionary defense system