The Bible never claims to be God's infallible Word

I'm not seeing where my opponent is claiming to have a problem with the content of this debate. Perhaps we should re-establish what this debate is about. To be fair, I did say that I have no problem with your conditions, "provided I am understanding them correctly". Furthermore, I would like to add that I AM THE ONE who chose this debate. We ARE discussing whether or not there is evidence that the Bible claimed to be the Word of God. I'm not sure what you mean exactly by "internal evidence". I brought up the issues of cannon to cite historical events of HOW we got the Bible in the first place. You mentioned the book of Revelation. Quoting historical events is not "conspiracy". I never claimed there was a "fix" on anything. I simply stated from a historical sense, when the cannon was decided on; THAT IS ALL. I think the question of "What qualified these men to vote on the cannon" is an extremely valid one. First you say that you don't want to debate the subject of canonicity, but then you give arguments related to it. I will however, give a rebuttal to your argument pertaining to The Muratorian Fragment. First off, I never said there was not a list of New Testament books, what I said was that the Catholic and Protestant Churches did not AGREE which books should be in the cannon and which ones should not, until 367 and 1647. I will ask you this since you mentioned The Muratorian Fragment, why do you accept the books listed as "The Word of God", when no one has ever determined who authored this text? If it was never discovered in the Ambrosian Library in Milan by Father Ludovico Antonio Muratori, then what would have happened? Now, if you choose not to continue this debate, then forfeit. Also, I have given rebuttals to the Bible references you mentioned AND I asked some Biblical questions of my own. Even if my opponent chooses not to debate the issue pertaining to the issues of the cannon, he has still not dealt or answered or rebutted the following: 1) What is your reply to my rebuttal pertaining to 2 Peter 3:16? 2) 1 Cor 7:12 where Paul says, "To the rest I speak, (I, not the Lord) if any man..." simply for the fact that I believe that proves MY case and not my opponents. Paul was going out of his way to show that what he was writing was not from God, but from himself. In fact, he does so again in 1 Cor 7:25 ""Now concerning virgins I HAVE NO COMMANDMENT OF THE LORD, yet I give MY judgment..." 2 Cor 11:17, "That which I speak, I SPEAK NOT AFTER THE LORD, but as in foolishness, in the confidence of his glory." If ALL of the Bible is God's Word, how do you reconcile theses passages? Again, Paul is making it clear that it is HE HIMSELF speaking and writing here, NOT God. 3) John 1:1 and verse 14 tells us what the "WORD" is. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God. And the Word was God." verse 14 "And the Word became flesh (Jesus) and dwelt among us.." Here the "Word" is defined and I see no mention of the Bible or even Scripture. If the Bible or Scripture is the Word, then why don't you worship the Bible? After all, the "Word" is called "God" in John 1. That is one of the strongest arguments from Christians that believe in the deity of Christ; it's because the "Word" is called "God" and Jesus is called the "Word". Again, if the Bible is the "Word", why is IT TOO not God? My opponent is trying to deny that I am not arguing the proper content of this debate. While I realize communication can be a factor, I don't believe he is being honest about his lack of understanding in this particular circumstance. I have not once mentioned "conspiracy". HE is the one that agreed to this debate, not the other way around. I am arguing from a Biblical and historical sense and I never said we ONLY use the Bible to prove our position. I only insisted that we use "the entire Bible". The title of this debate is "The Bible Never Claims to be God's Infallible Word". The only reference I made to the cannon way why the people who voted on which books made it in and which ones did not could be trusted. That is a very important point when trying to decipher the Bible's claims about itself. With that, I yield to my opponent.