Bible has Flaws

"Well I think I need to come at this in a whole new way, my topic of my debate is the bible has flaws, I am for meaning I show that the bible has flaws in its teachings, such as contradictions." Just because you say that, doesn't give you the ability to not answer all of my replies. A, B, C, D, E, 1, 2 and several comments ive crossed checked. RE: I said "KJ does not see them as legitimate words from God, due to historical, factual, and doctrine errors. AKA tampered." Aceviper2011 - My opponent said this in his last argument. but what my opponent do not realize the word of god is the word of god no matter what bible. If this is the case, then your changing the topic away from one type of god, and allowing the usage of -any- god. Lets use the Korans god vs bible and see what happens? If you are going to follow this logic, then i shall respond with my own logic. You cannot disprove my Gods integrity, yet you cannot prove KJ bible is flawed. So if your going to say, the bible is flawed then which one? Or all of them? Ok, lets start with Torah (50% is from the bible) Christian bible, Catholic bible, Koran which says it's the perfected version, or addition to the bible. Or Jehovah's witness bible, and Mormons who claim the same thing. Then we have the New Age moment which also use parts of the bible. So, i shall let you begin by proving all these bibles are flawed, until you come to the bible i believe in, then we can continue the debate. --- Ive replied to all points, and ive noted in round 3 he didnt answer my reply about topic A, B, C, D, 1), 2) - All because he changed this debate details at the 4th Round. --- I noted in Round 1, about my application to evidence process, which it appears Aceviper2011 is overlooking so he can say im not defending. -----Round 1----- I accept. Since I stand on Con, and i already believe the Bible has no flaws, i have no material to present...unless people want me to list endless teachings on which prove there are no flaws. I think people and my opponent may find this a waste. I think Aceviper2011 has alot of interesting topics to bring up, which i can respond to. ------ As you can see, im defending my personal opinion after Aceviper2011 already has alot of material to use to prove his position. If Voters and Aceviper2011 want me to go through every single area of the KJ bible to prove that it's not flawed, then can we allow for 5 million words per Round? Just replying to you questions -only- has used 8,000 letters. I dont have a chance to input anymore information due to the word limit. So in my position i have two choices. Dont answer all your questions and give my own points 50% to 50%, then you will say im avoiding questions. Or if i answer all your questions you say im not making any points. Interesting to note, ive actually done both. Ive answered his questions and shown that -other- so called bibles are very flawed in doctrine and historical accounts. Koran taking 200 years after Muhammad died to even start writing about his life. Or Jehovah witness and Mormons denying Jewish traditions, and being highly inaccurate historically. Also Catholics who teach "be not to do not marry" and "pray to Mary" which are both totally fabricated. ------ "I also want to let my viewers know I have shown contradictions, and flaws of the bible." Ok, show me one that i haven't already answered? ---- "Well I think I need to come at this in a whole new way, my topic of my debate is the bible has flaws, I am for meaning I show that the bible has flaws in its teachings, such as contradictions." Just because you say that, doesn't give you the ability to not answer all of my replies. A, B, C, D, E, 1, 2 and several comments ive crossed checked.