Actions by a god would have been detected by science by now.

There is no claim, I just report what is commonly accepted by people generally about gods. I make no claims that gods exist, that they interact with this realm or anything of that nature. I just lay out the facts as I see them, as a base for my actual claim that gods (if they exist) do not interact with the reality that we exist in.Proof???I support this claim by the fact that science has never managed to detect any interaction into this reality or within this reality that could only be the result of a god. I suggest that there is no effect that has been detected that would require a god to be involved in it, or to be the creator of that effect. And the reason that I suggest this, is because some of the major attributes of gods actively go against what is observed in reality currently.That is exactly the problem, you are not giving evidence for your claims, once you do this I can successfully refute your arguments.Please give evidence.Namely, that every effect noticed does not require a supernatural explanation for it. The key word "every" means all that has been noticed in the whole of the existence of this reality. I could present a list of everything that has ever been noticed, discovered or reasoned to be, and not one of those things has a need to have a unnatural creator or maintainer of itself, but space available makes this practically impossible.Then I suggest you cite some, because making assertions without arguments is not getting you anywhere.So being unable to present everything that is for testing, one would be force to ask what would make this claim invalid, and that would be the presentation of something that only a god's interaction could provide the falsification.What makes this claim invalid, is the lack of evidence.As evidence I would offer that ability of science to either provide a complete answer for an event or object, or to be able to provide reasons to exclude the possibility of non natural interactions in the causing of the event or object. Again actually evidence for every possible event notice or object in existence would be impractical, so the route of falsification has to be followed.This should be explained before I can negate it.Science can now detect any changes in this reality, and to a greater degree detect the location of the cause of these changes, which today has shown that these causes are all within this reality and are knowable by science.Evidence, please?As to the requested proof for this, that would be the answer supplied for every event observed, object discovery and possible existence reasoned. This proof would be that there is no need to suggest a god had to be involved because there is always a better, easier and more complete answer in the natural realm.This is unrelated to your resolution.A god answer for any real thing, is unnecessarily more complex because of what a god would have to do to accomplish the action. This action would be the changing of the whole of the universe, including both past and future to allow for the god to fit the change into the remade universe. While this is possible from a god's ability, a much simple explanation is always available for every event or object. Which allows the use of Occam's Razor to determine which would be the better answer. If one would rather claim that a god would use this ultimately complex method, constantly and it would have to be constantly going on involving every event and object that ever existed in the past and will ever exist in the future, then one would have a "god" that is nothing more than the universe itself. This would be acceptable except for the problem that there are explanation for events and objects that seem not require unnatural causes and have rational natural causes. This demands either a reason for the unneeded complexity of the gods management or gods are unnecessary for events and objects to occur.This is unrelated to your argument.