father christmas is real and alive

Just to clarify, my opponent has the burden of proof to prove that father Christmas is real and alive, as he chooses to be pro on this argument, therefore that is what he is trying to prove to me and the audience: that Father Christmas is 'real and alive'. Therefore I only have to prove that he is wrong, disprove all of his arguments, also known as rebutt, and therefore if I can prove his arguments and points wrong, then I win as he has failed to prove his point, and my view on this matter, (con,) still still stands as correct. Now onto the rebuttals: 1.)My opponent promptly states in R2, "Father Christmas has existed for a long time". When he does this, he fails to back up that statement with anything, doesn't show the audience and me, how he has even come to this conclusion, or even how in any way, shape, or form that this statement is even relevant, and he does not offer any reasons as to how this is not a personal opinion, or how this is logically backed up, or even proves why he says this. Therefore, I would like to request that my opponent please revise and fix this argument, for all of the reasons above-as there are many errors and mistakes that befuddle and have no relevance on this topic of this argument: which is, "Father Christmas is real and alive". Notice: nowhere in that title does it state that we are arguing over how long, (if real,) Father Christmas has been "Real and alive", as you still haven't proved that he exists, rather then how long he has been alive, or 'real'. So please, fix this argument for your next round, as currently it has no relevance on the argument at hand. 2.) The next point my opponent makes in his argument, is "Children seem to find things like slay marks or tapping on their roof tops." but he fails to provide where he got this information. Nor does he provide us with any source, reasoning, or logic/proof that children have found evidence of this. And furthermore-even if this was real evidence you are saying CHILDREN have found evidence of "slay marks or tapping on their roof tops". If this really happened, then wouldn't everyone in the world report problems relating to what you have described? Furthermore-you still have not linked the relevance of this point to the argument. Any outsider who does not know anything about how this has to do with the argument over "Father Christmas" exists would not even know the purpose of this statement. And yet again, you have not provided us with any proof or you haven't stated any reasons for this point to having held enough relevance to the argument, that you used it as one of your arguments. Please, if your going to use that point, add a source of RELIABLE INFORMATION, (AKA NOT WIKIPEDIA OR ASK.COM,) and prove to us the relevance, and logic behind this point. 3.) The next statement, (and last,) that my opponent makes is, "How would this be if father Christmas does not exist?" but I fail to see how father Christmas has anything to do with tapping on roof tops? I do know a couple causes of tapping, as many people know from logic and experience, rain will usually cause tapping noises to occur when it hits rooftops, therefore also could 100 percent explain the fact that you claim without evidence, that tapping is heard by children, (and you also do not specify where, when, and proof!) as rain is known to cause tapping on roof tops. Same applies to hail, ice, sleet, or even an mechanical/engineering problem with some equipment inside the child(s) house. Sometimes when equipment malfunctions, weird things happen with the mechanism such as A.) Weird noises B.) Smoke or other harmful gasses to come from the mechanism C.) Mechanism may not work as properly intended D.) Explosion or releasing of other harmful gases/liquid/material(s) Could that explain for tapping? Even if it wasn't these causes-what makes the tapping that somehow automatically proves that 'Father Christmas' exists and is alive? I see no proof that automatically proves your side of this argument the one that is correct. And how could this be, even if father Christmas does exist? Answer that, and please fix your whole argument as I fail to see how anything you have said is relevant, or even proved correct and true, as you fail to correctly prove your side of this argument correct for all of the above reasons. Arguments: Since my opponent has not put up any moderately good arguments for R2, (for any number of reasons unknown to me and the viewers,) I feel that I really won't have to provide too much arguments, in fact I'm not required to provide any as previously in this round, I stated how the BOP is on pro to prove himself correct, as he must prove that [Father Christmas] is "Real and alive", and so far he has failed to do so. But I digress. 1.) Since when, has 'magic' existed, for someone to use 'magical' reindeer to fly a sleigh, deliver presents to children all over the world, when magic doesn't, ( as far as we know ) exist in this day and age? 2.) Its weird that not everyone gets presents-and the fact is not everyone believes in Christmas, therefore they do not believe in any terms of the holiday, including Father Christmas. But it is claimed and widely know that father Christmas delivers presents to all the children everywhere in the world, so why is it that not everyone gets presents? Can father Christmas go through a chimney when their is no chimney? 3.) Also, think of the plain logic-theres too many people and the time zones and countries-father Christmas would have to deliver presents to houses 0.5 seconds per house, ( on a scale of a ballpark estimate of every house on the planet, and that is what it was around,) and that is just plain impossible, and ridiculous. Back to you, con.