BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Hillary Clinton Is a Werewolf

My opponent guessed next round is just summing up thoughts. Rebutting is allowed for round 4, however no new arguments or questions may be bought up. Rebutting the Rebuts my opponents rebutted over my rebuttals:1) Obvious Evidence:They recently discovered Bill's death, due to the constant attention on the Clinton's during the election. However, they though it was suicide and that it was a lot sooner. Hillary told everyone they were lying when they found out. . https://www.ncscooper.com...Hillary also preserved bill's body due to cryogenic freezing.2) Photographic Evidence:R1: Fine we will leave it up to voters, however I think it looks nothing like a lizard's eye. Keep in mind if Hillary was a reptilian, the pupil should be more narrow, her iris should be much larger, and her sclera shouldn't be visible, as those are all characteristics in lizard eyes. R2: My opponent glosses over the fact that Hillary's teeth look like a fangs, just like a wolf. R3: Very well, we shall leave the third photograph's authenticity up to the voters. Rebutting my Opponents Arguments.1) Hillary ATTEMPTED to play the pity card. She thought a majority of Americans would vote for her because of this. However, the plan backfired when she got backlash and Trump used it against her.2) She had a body double with a voice altering microphone (Yes, voice altering microphones are an actual thing). This Microphone made her sound like Hillary Clinton. I thank my opponent for this wonderful debate. I also will remind her that rebutting is allowed for round 4, however no new arguments or questions may be bought up. With that I end here. Hopefully all of you can see how Hillary Clinton is a Werewolf.
Hillary Clinton Is a Werewolf

Rebutting my opponents rebuttal over my rebuttal: 1) Obvious Evidence: The burden of proof is on you in this case. Meaning, you need to prove this theory right. 2) Photographic Evidence: my eyes tell me that it looks like a lizard, I shall leave the judging to the voters. ->2. The second photograph was not addressed, because Hillary conveniently noticed the cameras and closed her eyes to not expose her reptilian pupils. However, she didn't care about her mouth as they are used as a distraction at best. ->3. whether or not that is true is unknown, as we can only see it is photoshopped. So either she succeeded in her plan or there is no plan. That shall also be left to the judges, but I strongly believed that the photoshopped is not a conspiracy theory, but the picture actually being photoshopped. Second rebuttal point: 1) Hilary didn't play the pity card around the public card, because that made her lose rather than win. She received more backlash for hiding it, and it was used by her candidate opponent as a weapon for her being weak. 2. The body double is A BODY DOUBLE not a voice double. So she had to be there to speak by herself. I guess next round we just sum up our own thoughts rather than rebuttals and leave the rest to the judges. // external : btw, this is the best 5am debate I ever had.
Hillary Clinton Is a Werewolf

Rebutting my Opponents Rebuttals: R1. Obvious Evidence While my opponent is right in saying Bill Clinton is a reptilian, however he doesn't know Hillary is a werewolf. Why? Because the real Bill Clinton is dead. He died shortly after he met Hillary. Hillary killed him once he found out she was a Werewolf. Hillary then got a werewolf look-alike to dress up as Bill, and the two of them infiltrated the reptilian government. R2. Photographical Evidence 1) In the link Hillary's eyes don't look like a lizards. The pupil isn't narrow enough, her iris should be much larger, and the sclera is still visible. This are all common traits of lizard eyes. The wolf's iris is more like Hillary's. Also you should know she is midway though transformation, so all of the effects are not yet visible. 2) Con didn't address my second photograph 3) Hillary wants you to think it is photo-shopped. After it got on the internet, Hillary forced the owner to put it on the site to make it seem photo-shopped. She couldn't take it off the internet, or the reptilians would be suspicious to why she is frantically deleting "fake" werewolf photos of her. R3) This shows the similar characteristics between Hillary and Werewolves. She has to be a werewolf, because reptilians don't act like that. R4) The reason Hillary didn't send a task force to area 51, is because she never became president, and had the power to do so. Refuting Con's Arguments: 1) Yes, Hillary plays the pity card around the public eye, just to get the vote, when in-fact she is a strong man-eating werewolf! 2) This is easy. Hillary had a non-werewolf body double to due the speech for her. Once again I rest my case here, hopefully Con can see how Hillary is a werewolf.
Hillary Clinton Is a Werewolf

First I want to mention, that I will argue that Hillary Clinton is not a werewolf, under the assumption that werewolves are real. First my rebuttal: 1. The NOT so Obvious Evidence: It is a well-known theory, even more than werewolves being the mortal enemies of lizard. That reptilian shapeshifters are control of the U.S government, and that they only pass the presidency from one reptilian shapeshifter to the other. So, there is NO WAY Bill Clinton 42nd President of the United States from 1993 to 2001 who is a reptilian himself, and the husband of Hilary, could not notice that she is his species "mortal enemy". 2. Photographical Evidance - look at the eyes! 1) http://www.whale.to... the following link you provided, shows Hillary's eyes clearly. Now I want you to compare these eyes with wolve's eyes http://cdn.pursuitist.com... And Lizard's eyes http://www.mrwallpaper.com... The eyes don't look like a wolf at all! not even close to it. However, it does look like a lizard's eyes a lot. 3) that is obviously photoshopped and it can be found from this website http://www.freakingnews.com... which has a lot of other photoshopped pictures 3. Video Evidence. It is very funny, however, we all behave a bit loony sometimes. this does not prove that she is a werewolves. 4. The article quotes Clinton saying "He has made me personally pledge we are going to get the information out," Clinton said. "One way or another. Maybe we could have, like, a task force to go to Area 51." Well? did she? no! because there is no such thing! it is a satire website Now my argument: Under popular belief, werewolves have stronger physical attributes than mere men, and they turn on full moons. 1) She does not have the physical strength and health of a werewolf Infact, Hilary Clinton has been sick during her debate against Donald trump, and he used that to make her seem weak, hence losing her few points with the people. Source: http://www.express.co.uk... 2)Appearances during a full moon. 24/1/2016 Was a full moon night, yet, instead of turning into a werewolf. Hillary Clinton was giving speeches at various places. One of the speeches was even inside of a church. Sources : https://www.calendar-12.com... https://hillaryspeeches.com... And that sir, is how I prove that there is no way that Hillary Clinton is a werewolf or else she would've turned in front of everyone. // external note: stop saying you don't believe what you are saying. Debate as if you do, that is the rule of the game.
Hillary Clinton Is a Werewolf

Alright, I'll get started. Also, just so you know, I don't actually believe Hillary is a werewolf, I was just bored and decided to do an interesting, and strange debate.1. The Obvious EvidanceEvery reasonable person knows that werewolves are the mortal enemies of lizard people. Therefore we can conclude Hillary is trying to dethrone the reptillian goerment that is controlling the world. However being a werewolf, she would make the world a lot worse if she became president. This explains her hatred of Obama, who is a lizard person. . http://nypost.com...Obama endorsed her, not knowing she was a werewolf, so she could be the reptillian proxy in the U. S. Government. From there she would have attempted to do a worldwide reptilian genocide.2. Photographical EvidanceHillary Clinton has been caught in the act of transforming into a werewolf many times. Here are a couple.1) You can look at the image below, and see she is starting to grow fangs. This is quite unnatural. . http://www.whale.to...You can only conclude she is in the process of becoming a werewolf.2) Here is another picture showing the growing of fangs and the absence of lips. . http://www.whale.to...Once again, she is in the process of becoming a werewolf3) If you look at the image below, you will notice the large fangs. . http://www.freakingnews.com...Now you can tell this isn't normal. Nobody has fangs, especially like that. She must be in the middle of the process of turning into a werewolf.3. Video EvidanceThe video below shows a dummy (literally) comparing Hillary to a Werewolf. As you can tell Hillary and Werewolves are extremely similar. This shows that the actions of werewolves and hillary are very similar, showing Hillary has a good chance of being one.4. Alien EvidanceHillary is quite interested with the idea of aliens. Why? Because she is a werewolf from the moon! She knows about them already and wants the public to know so they can unite and overthrow the alien-reptillian government! . http://thehill.com...I rest my case here, hoping everybody can see how Hillary is a werewolf. Once again just so everybody knows, I don't believe Hillary is a werewolf, I'm just doing this for fun.
United States federal government should continue allowing abortions for the 1st and 2nd trimesters.

i wasnt 'trampling' the constitution,but i am trampling the way youre translating it. i dont think our founding fathers would, if ever possible, look into the future and enjoy seeing the fetal products of their hardwork sucked out and utterly destroyed. Du you think they would enjoy that. No, you dont win, because your arguments are.. logical, but incredibly stupid. youre trying to make me look bad by implying that I am somehow against the constitution. i wish you would wake up... If the people seeing this are going to vote according to technicality, you win by far, but if their judging on who actually cares, and who's morally sound. I have a feeling you'd be severely outnumbered in your supporters. about infanticide, i said that it would be only logical to assume harmless, little, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimester abortions would lead to that. and.. since you want to talk about topicality, you didnt mention 1st or 2nd trimester abortions in ANY of your arguments. Therefore, technically, little to nothing you said means anything... only technically of course.
United States federal government should continue allowing abortions for the 1st and 2nd trimesters.

i clearly said i think if a woman is raped she should be given a choice. For people that actually think a human life, no matter at what stage, could accomplish amazing things, the thought of a whore having unprotected sex with every guy she meets, and just aborting something which has the ability to do so much greatness, it's pretty sad. i personally think that abortion will lead to infanticide, which will lead to a cleansing of human beings.For example, In the future im afraid that if a woman has a baby with blue eyes, instead of, i dont know, green eyes, she'll just give up her "fetus" and try again and again. You can always give the constitutional, blah blah, limiting of freedoms, crap speech, but that doesnt make your arguments morally correct. again, i think if a woman is raped,in all politically correctedness, she should be able to have an abortion. but, i dont think its right, my reason being that i feel it will lead to something much worse, that you might not support, but, these infanticidophilic people will use your same arguments against you. And if there is a way to save that life, or prelife, and the mother,i think it should be put in to play in every case.
United States federal government should continue allowing abortions for the 1st and 2nd trimesters.

+++ Well. Maybe somebody does love the baby. Maybe not. That's not what this debate is about. +++ You cannot kill hobos, because the hobo will not be an emotional and financial leech for 18 years of your life. And a hobo is a person. +++ We have seen your definition of infanticide. However, abortion is sucking out of embryos, not killing infants. infant: A child in the earliest period of life, especially before he or she can walk. Just in case, a child is: 1. A person between birth and puberty. 2. A person who has not attained maturity or the age of legal majority. Opponent>>> I wish gov't would strongly advertise having the baby, and giving it to families that are unable to have children. +++ I agree. If the woman wants to give up the baby, this is good. But no woman should be forced by her government to have a child. +++ Here are some points of mine you never rebutted and therefore I should win upon unless you concede them or rebut them in the future: *** Science proves that a baby cannot think or feel until the third trimester (about 26 weeks). It's not a life your destroying, it's a woman's life you're saving. http://www.health.state.mn.us.........: Minnesota Health Dept. http://www.nytimes.com.........: New York Times Neither of my sites are biased. Mine are medical. *** Abortion laws are unconstitutional because they limit freedom and take lives of unhealthy women. *** The United States is "for the people, by the people." Give them their freedoms to live their lives the way they want. For the people. Not for the embryos. The Constitution uses the word not to restrict the government 22 times! The founding fathers would be disgraced by pro-lifers. *** During the era of abortion bans, women would shove hangars down themselves. Illegal abortions are unsafe. Often, the women die and the children. And if the woman is caught getting an abortion the baby will have a mother who is in prison! Illegal abortions kill the mother and embryos. Legal abortions suck the embryo. +++ You've conceited two of my main points: forced death of the mother and rape. However, these are only a small number of women at abortion clinics. No abortion clinic can financially survive with just this small percentage of clients. You have to let anyone use this service before the first 26 weeks or else raped women will have nowhere to have an abortion because abortion clinics will all go out of business. And those unhealthy women who will die without abortion will be doomed. There is no life until 26 weeks into the fetushood. The child cannot think, hear, feel, and has no idea it will soon experience life. It is something in the woman's body without feelings, thoughts or life, period. It is the woman's choice of what to do with her body and no government should be so tyrannical as to force her to have an unwanted child or to get an illegal abortion, which is likely to kill her and the baby.
United States federal government should continue allowing abortions for the 1st and 2nd trimesters.

okee doke. i do agree with the statement that if a woman is going to die during childbirth, the child should be aborted, but i will have to disagree with your argument that because no one loves the baby, it doesnt matter what its fate happens to be. in that case, if i find some hobo that no one loves, morally, i could stab it, blow it up, anything i want, right. your arguments are pretty sound over all, so i think that i have more of a problem with infanticide. nï¿½fanï¿½tiï¿½cide Audio Help [in-fan-tuh-sahyd] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1.the act of killing an infant. 2.the practice of killing newborn infants. 3.a person who kills an infant. [Origin: 1650–60; (def. 1) < LL infanticīdium; (def. 2) < LL infanticīda. See infant, -i-, -cide] —Related forms inï¿½fanï¿½tiï¿½cidï¿½al, adjective Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, ï¿½ Random House, Inc. 2006. If you were raped, i think, constitutionally, you should be given the choice of abortion, but I wish gov't would strongly advertise having the baby, and giving it to families that are unable to have children. Therefore, that infant has a chance of having a better life. You dont know the limits of humanity, and i think the value of a human life is worth so much more than you're making it in your argument.
United States federal government should continue allowing abortions for the 1st and 2nd trimesters.

+++ Some women are known to be prone to death before the birth. Certain women are not healthy enough to give birth. These women will die without abortion. What if a woman or girl you loved, your mother, or girlfriend, got pregnant and you knew she would die when she had the baby. Abortion laws turn due dates into death dates. +++ Abortion laws are unconstitutional and unhealthy women to kill themselves for the sake of a child that nobody knows or loves, unlike the woman. Many Supreme Court justices based the Row vs. Wade vote on this. +++ A woman who was RAPED is already brutally victimized. Why would you force her to have an unwanted child? That is immoral. And some of these women are not healthy enough to give birth. If they're lucky enough to survive the rape, they're sure to die during child birth. +++ Science proves that a baby cannot think or feel until the third trimester (about 26 weeks). It's not a life your destroying, it's a woman's life you're saving. . http://www.health.state.mn.us......: Minnesota Health Dept. . http://www.nytimes.com......: New York Times Neither of my sites are biased. Mine are medical. +++ The United States is "for the people, by the people. " Give them their freedoms to live their lives the way they want. For the people. Not for the embryos. +++ The Constitution uses the word not to restrict the government 22 times! The founding fathers would be disgraced by pro-lifers. +++ During the era of abortion bans, women would shove hangars down themselves. Illegal abortions are unsafe. Often, the women die and the children. And if the woman is caught getting an abortion the baby will have a mother who is in prison! Illegal abortions kill the mother and embryos. Legal abortions suck the embryo. +++ God does not oppose abortion. God opposes murder! Abortion is not murder! Murdering is defined as a malicious killing of another human. Abortion is not malicious, not toward a human. God, obviously, wants a mother to love her child so she has to suffer with it for nine months. This is why you see a lot more fathers abandoning children than mothers. Forcing a woman to have a child is against God's plan. My mother, a Christian, got an abortion as a teenager. She knows that if she would have had that child without wanting to, she would have neglected it. God agrees. God supports abortion. +++ You cannot force the Christian religion on all Americans. Abortion is not immoral. Abortion is logically beneficial. Christian conservatives are the ones opposing abortion for false religious reasons. We have the freedom religion. Religious conservatives are destroying this country. Thank you for the debate.
State Colleges should be free for the students that live in that state

Almost every young adult today is expected to have a college degree. It is a social norm in todays society. Many people have a lot to consider when applying to colleges. Things such as location, size of the school, its reputaion and its majors are things that will decide whether you will attend or not. But the most important thing that people have to consider is the cost. Whether a community college, private college or state college, this educational expense can affect families and students. Even State colleges can cost up to about $30,000 a year. This leaves students coming out of college with extreme debt. This is causing a major issue in today's society. After college, young adults are expected to live on thier own and fend for themselves. After leaving school, students realize that they will not be able to afford the expensies of living on thier own and they soon find themselves moving back at home with their parents. College is supposed to teach young adults to be independent. This is not going to be happening if they are forced to move back home as soon as they are finished getting their degree. With an average cost of $30,000 per year for college tuition, a four year degree will cost the student $120,000. This is a tremdous debt for anyone to burden, much less a young adult who has just graduated college. Adults purchasing a house take on this level of debt and then arrange for it to be paid back over twenty to thirty years. Many of the loans afforded to students are required to be paid back in much less time. How, with little to no experience to speak of, can a new graduate get a job paying enough to both support themselves and pay back this enormous debt. They cannot. So, the student ends up living at home with their parents to speed up the process of paying back their loans. If the former student gets a job paying $40,000 per year, their take home pay will be about sixty percent or about $25,000. Now if you take all of these earnings and put them towards the outstanding college loans, it will take about five years to pay back the loans. However, this is not reality so it will take much longer. Most likely, the pay back of the loans will be more like $10,000 per year. With this pay schedule, the payback is now up to twelve years. I'm also assuming that these loans carry no interest. Not likely! How can you even think of going to a bank to obtain a credit rating or another loan with this much debt on you? Other countries don't put this burden on their young adults. If education is a priority to get our economy running again the way we need it to, then the education of our youth is a top priority. That being said, how can the education of youth be a priority if the cost prohibits so many students from attending and getting a college education. In this economy, a college education is not an option, it is a requirement. By making state colleges free for students living in that state, we will make college education available to anyone who wants this education.