all criminals should be killed immediately regardless of their actions

My bad i didn't add more round, this is fun. But here we go, round 3. "Because if he/she is not an orphan and do have parents, he/she won"t be starving to death." Oh really? Because there are thousands of families in Greece right now, that can not pay their electricity bills, and their kids pass out in schools due to hunger. You can't make such a generalization like that. "About that psychological problem, there is nothing that we can do about that since it"s almost like an incurable disease. Even if it"s cured, we don"t know much longer he"ll go bonkers like before and starts on killing people. Do you know that killing one criminal will be same like saving the lives of hundreds of innocent lives." These people can not think clearly. These people can not behave. You can't kill them for doing things they don't even understand they do. It's either the family's job or goverment's job to take care of those people, maybe put them in a bedlam, to keep both them and the rest of us safe. It's not their fault they went out and killed somebody, because these people can't think for themselves. It's us that need to take care of them as a society. We should be protecting them, not killing them. " Dogs do offer something to the society. Don"t you know that some of them are used to track bombs, criminals with their powerful sense of smell." Some of them... By your logic, since the rest 95% of the dogs don't offer to the society, they shall be killed. Because dogs can perform acts of arson, they can steal or in some extreme cases, kill too. Shall they be slain? I don't find that rational. "Everyone offers something to the society" No... needless to explain. "Even old people offers something. Don"t you know that old people have a job. Is that not part of the society? And even if they"re retired, they can still hand down their experience, knowledge to the young ones." Let me tell you. Criminals can also, after they have been released from a jail sentence, get a job and hand down their life experiences. They can be useful to the society, and you just wrote how. "And didn't I tell you that those that have commit heinous crimes and is of no use to the society are criminals. Only those with both are considered as criminals" I don't really know what you mean. From what i understood, you say that people that have committed heinous crimes and they do not contribute to the society, these are defined as criminals. So if i go and kill a couple of people, rape both women and innocent child, but i have a job that does something to the society, for example a doctor, i am not a criminal? What's your logic here? "And kids do offer something to the society. They are the people of tomorrow. The next generation. Without them our kind will face extinction. So, it turns out that kids are the most important part of a society. And you said that they don"t offer a damn thing to the society." As of now, yes. They don't offer a damn thing. You mean that the 2 year-old Jason, staying in the house all day playing with cars and other toys contributes to the society? No. Then you say, they are the people of the future. So in the future they will do something for the society. How do you know that criminals, after they have been released from jail, won't contribute to the society? Most of them have jobs, which are likely for them to return to, and start working again. You have to realize that yes, there are people like the guy that went in the cinema and shot all those people in the Batman movie that do deserve to get their butt kicked. But there are criminals that do things like steal, or kill, that they are forced to do because of their lives being so hard and depressing. "And for that last question. I will pull the trigger on that psycho because if I don"t he will probably kill me and more lives will be harmed. Killing him will save more lives. You are the one that"s evil for not killing him and letting him go out killing the innocents. So, are trying to say that you"d rather have hundreds of people die rather than just one? Because if yes, you are an evil person." You need to understand that people do mistakes. I'm sorry, but who are you to judge if a person deserves to die or not. We, as a society, must give those criminals a second chance for a better life. I will explain to you why you are wrong. If a person is about to go rob a house and he knows that if he gets caught, he will be killed, chances are that he will do it anyway, as he has nothing to lose from his miserable little life. If i was as miserable as it takes to do crimes, and knew that being caught would mean an end to my miserable life, i would do it anyway. When you put a person in jail, he gets to think of what he did, he sees his errors, he regrets, and has the chance to improve his personality, his life. After he is released from jail, he gets a seconds chance for a better life. He is starting all over again. He is given the chance to change, to become a great person and contribute a lot to the society, some times even more than the average you or me can. Don't you think its fair to give people a second chance? Because people are not always what they seem they are, they might be something else on the inside. Jail sentence means you get the chance for a second, free life. I hope you had as much fun as i did from this, and i hope i can make you think of this for a second. Thank you.