Gay is Right in Christianity

To begin, I'd like to jump straight into rebuttals. " Is one bit neglected or outdated? No, all scripture is God breathed." When did I ever say scripture was outdated? Never! The word of God it be upheld whether it be new or old testament- however, what separates us from the Jews? the new estimate, and the belief that it is composed of the teachings of Jesus Christ. "God not going into the specifics about whether or not to wear glasses is different from him saying being gay is right or wrong. The bible did talk about homosexuality, but not glasses. There is a difference. I have heard some argue that the bible does not go into descriptions about what homosexuality is. But, the bible certainly mentioned it and let us not forget, all scripture is God breathed." Glasses are just as unnatural as homosexuality, the only exception is, your not born with glasses! You are however born homosexual. The closest you will ever be to God until you die is birth, so would it make sense to say that even though God just put through birth, you would be gay? That's what happens! It's not a choice, and therefor cannot be unnatural! "But, the bible certainly mentioned it and let us not forget, all scripture is God breathed." I know good and well that this was an attempt to portray me as person who does not follow God. I also know that you are attempting to make me feel like I am preaching against the word of God. I feel sorry for you, because I can assure you it did not work. I am a follower of God who knows that cherry-picking versus is grossly inappropriate, and hypocritical. "Rules in the Bible were and still are tied to reasoning. This explains the other laws stated in Leviticus." I understand this, which is why I included my 'Onan' argument, which you promptly dismissed. "He was directly disobeying God. Therefore, Onan's case was not proof that semen alone was considered unclean. It was that disobeying God is a sin, which is in consistency with the above stated axiom. The fact that the semen was spilled is an understatement." This is the equivalent to pulling a bunny out of a hat. You can provide "reasoning" which is not necessarily the full story. the bottom line is, of that time period, God needed people to have lots of children. Which was pecan pie homosexuality of frowned upon, along with pulling out. next, "Is only what Jesus said directly while still on Earth holy and valid? Is not all scripture God breathed? Certainly, Paul's writings were moved by the Holy Spirit. Certainly, Timothy, John and other believers and apostles were also moved by the Holy Spirit. Again, it should be restated that we can love sinners but hate sin. Sinners are the victim of sin. Therefore, Jesus' love does not abolish all law, Jesus' love does not make sins valid. Jesus' Love is not an excuse to sin or a proof that an action is not a sin." I understand all this! However, without Jesus Christ, and the new testament, we would basically be Jews. I'm not saying one is more important, but different religions is a major difference! And either way, in context, there is not a single chapter in the bible that only go's after homosexuals because it's "unnatural". I'm not even going to bother to read the rest, just know that I still disagree with your stance, regardless of what those versus say. To wrap things up, I'm also going to say, that just like you have pointed out on SEVERAL occasions, man is full of evil. Some might say the devil himself. However, everyday men were allowed to write the bible. It would be ignorant to think that personal agendas were not put first. At the end of the day, humans are human. Could Bias be in the bible. You better believe that man is imperfect. But there is no reason for us to judge. just like the verse that you did not give an argument to, "Let he who is with out sin throw the first stone". Which WAS said by a perfect man. One who only wanted better for us. Thank you, I have finished.