Modern Music makes no sense and has a bad influence on todays society

"Are relationships not meaningful? Love is one of the biggest driving forces in today's society, and therefore when something important happens in a songwriter's life, they may be inclined to write a song about it", Relationships to an extent are meaningful, but every single modern song that i have come across, talks about relationships and i did state that most artist do allude to other forms of relations like sexual relations which does have a bad effect on todays society. I believe that rap artists tend to do this more than pop artists and i think that there are just better things you can base your song on. "Also, there are plenty of non-relationship songs in the pop genre" There may have been plenty of non-relationship songs but i'm pretty sure the vast majority of them are associated with relationships. This idea of relationships tends to become repeated and when something is repeated way too often, it loses its meaning. "First of all, just because something doesn't take as much talent as something else, it does not mean that it is less meaningful or makes no sense. There are plenty of things in life that are incredibly easy and yet incredibly important" Despite the recent advancements in technology, i think that many artist's talents are hindered by machines. If someone has the talent, they'd be willing to go that extra mile to create an amazing piece. Yes there are plenty of things in our everyday lives that are considered to be important yet simple, but i believe that this is irrelevant to the topic since the topic pertains to music. When it comes to music, there are certain factors to take into consideration such as talent, meaningfulness, passion, determination, etc. If there's no talent in a song, frankly speaking what's the point? why bother. I'm using this song as an example of talentless artists in the mainstream media who still were popularized by today's society. This song in my opinion does not sound appealing. The lyrics apparently talk about how they "made it"in the real world or something along the lines of that, but there are other things to sing about which would be less boring (opinion). "So just because songs back then talked about wars and past events means that they are more meaningful? There are plenty of songs today that talk about the artist's personal story and hardships they have gone through. There are songs that comment on CURRENT social issues, issues that to many are more important than past ones." I'm saying that at least they had a purpose, their songs had meaning and reached out to a vast audience instead of a specific group which modern songs tend to do ( reach out to specific groups). True some artist do sing about their personal hardships, but have most of them really gone through anything that bad? There are many other people who are going through things way worse than them. Im not saying that they shouldn't sing about their struggles but just know that there are millions of other people who are actually suffering and have it way worse than these artists. "There are plenty of bands and artists that do the same thing in today's music, you seem to just be judging the few songs that play on the radio. There are thousands of artists, all over the world, and a large amount of them actually make "meaningful" music." Well that's what people do, we tend to judge things we come across and you can't really help it, but from what i know there were more bands in the past that had meaningful lyrics then there are today, and if there are bands that have lyrics like that today then i commend them. From what i've heard, a lot of it doesn't seem to make sense and just encourages people to do things that are considered unorthodox. "Just because beyonce had more writers for her song does not make it less meaningful." Yes but does that mean it's her song since she had this many writers to write this song for her? With song being what it is (repetitive), and with the 6 writers working alongside beyonce i have come to the conclusion that this was a talent less song since you would expect with that many writers she could have come up with lyrics that were far more sophisticated than that. "plenty of songs out there that encouraged drug usage" Most of the songs back then didn't directly encourage drug usage, and just because of a band's psychedelic playing style, doesn't mean that they encourage drug usage. My question is that if you have all the resources available and you have the talent, then why create something so simple and expect it to be a hit when you have the ability to create something way more powerful.