That Islam is perfect...

As Salaamu Alaikum My opponent wishes to demonstrate that islam is imperfect. We must first be reminded that by perfection in islam, I referred to islam as the most perfect way of life in establishing peace. In other words, islam's way of establishing peace is perfect if its laws are practiced. So my opponent presents the following verses: "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Qur'an (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". Qur'an (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." So far, my opponent has referred to the qur'an. Good. However, we run into a problem. You see, I stated that islam is perfect in establishing peace if its laws are followed. Thus it is the responsibility of my opponent to show that following some laws in islam does not lead to peace, thus islam is imperfect. Yet amazingly, after posting a lengthy rebuttle, he dodges his responsibility! Take notice. He did not show from any of the verses, that if followed, it doesn't lead to peace. Simply amazing. You challenge someone to a debate, but don't actually debate the topic. Thus his own words and his dodging of the topic is evidence to the fact that islam is a perfect in establishing peace. Otherwise, my opponent would not be dodging the topic. Instead, he uses a strawman. Instead of showing us that some of the laws, if followed in the qur'an does not lead to peace, he instead presents the following argument: "The fact remains that if anyone wanted to, they could easily interpret these quotes as "Go and fight and terrify non-believers and you will be bestowed a vast reward." They wouldn't even have to try very hard, as I basically just paraphrased the quotes and used exactly the same words that were already there. Extremist Islamic leaders can quickly incite violence and murder just by reading these sorts of quotes." According to my opponent's logic, if someone wants to interpret the qur'an into a meaning other than the actual meaning of the qur'an, and they choose an unjust violent interpretation at that, this means that islam is not perfect in establishing peace. However, my opponent's example just further proves my point. For a misinterpretation of something means that it is not the actual interpretation. So someone who purposely interprets the qur'an into an unjust violent interpretation is not proving that islam is not peaceful, because their interpretation is not from islam. It's a misinterpretation. So my opponents example, in no such way, disproves that islam is perfect in establishing peace. Moving on. My opponent now suggests that because the verses in which he quoted suggest that muslims should fight, that this somehow means that islam is imperfect in establishing peace, because peace means "not fighting". But what did I say in my opening statement? I stated that islam is perfect in "establishing" peace. So yes, peace is not fighting. However, we are referring to establishing peace, not what peace is. So the point is irrelevant. The question is, is fighting a perfect way to establish peace? The answer is yes, in the case of self-defense. For if someone insist on violence towards you, the best and most perfect way to prevent the attack and restore peace is to fight back. Not only that, but to only fight until the attack towards you decease, for muslims should not transgress. So once again, islam demonstrates itself as a perfect way to establish peace.