Children (13 and under) should be banned from seeing PG13 and R Rated movies

Judges, I will totally understand if you give my opponent the vote for conduct. However, I would like to explain in this final round why you should still vote for me and not my opponent as well as address my opponent's rebuttal. Rebuttal 1: This really wasn't part of the resolution; my opponent was somewhat correct here. However, what my opponent is doing is that he is directly criticizing a rating system because it bases how appropriate content is based on age, so it is HE who is bringing the system into question. I digress, however, considering that the main point of my opponent's argument is that age is not an excellent arbiter of maturity. I explained, however, that at certain ages, the brain has different developments that directly correlate to the behaviors and reasoning of a person of such an age, and when it comes to these ages, the brain structures of these people (children, in this example) are directly affected by their emotions. At the basic level, a girl and boy's brain are still heavily immature, regardless of a girl's head start in their maturity. My opponent's evidence is solid. I will give him that. However, it doesn't change the fact that even so, a girl is still heavily immature in comparison to a person whose brain has developed enough to make conscious and rational decisions 100% of the time, meaning that his evidence is insignificant, at best. Rebuttal 2: At the point where my opponent concedes to the idea that children should not see ALL "R" rated movies, he is moving more toward the PRO argument because the resolution is clearly talking about PG-13 and R-rated films in general. At the point where he concedes this, it means that he affirms that at some level, some rated R and PG-13 films are actually things that are not appropriate. My opponent brings up this example of some films having this unreasonable rating, but for one thing, he doesn't provide a quantitative measure as to how many of these movies are actually badly rated, thus showing us that my opponent doesn't provide a measure of efficiency for the rating system. Overall, it could be very high. Overall, it could be very low. Who knows considering my opponent provides no such measure of efficiency. For another thing, even if we have had unreasonable ratings before, I've explained: no one said that our rating system is perfect, but when we look at movies in this rating in general, including films like The Exorcist or The Terminator or other such high-violence, high-profanity, etc. films, we can conclude that in general, children should be banned. The parent, of course, always bears some responsibility, but in the cases where this responsibility is not supplied, this banning system will help sustain the responsibility needed. Reasons for voting PRO: Like I said, the conduct vote should definately go for the CON considering my forfeit, but the vote for actual argumentation should go to me. In the first point, my opponent points out the difference in maturity between girls and boys, but doesn't argue that at the most basic level, their cognitive ability are heavily similar considering their brain structure despite minor differences, so he pretty much concedes, and he agrees that many of these films are things that should not be seen by children when we're arguing in the general and provides no quantitative standard to measure the efficiency of the rating system. In the end, he pretty much agrees with almost everything I said. Sources: . http://www.aacap.org...http://www.sciencemag.org...http://www.aacap.org...