I shouldn't have changed my DDO Username

And as a brief note to the voters, if my opponent has to forfeit a round it should not be held against him. He is under a time constraint. Should he happen to forfeit a round, then I will do so as well. As brief road-map I will be offering constructive arguments for my own side first, and will then refute my opponent's arguments. Con - I was no longer content with my old username, nor did I feel it was relevant in describing me. "Hello-Orange" while easy to say and read, is not only rather boring but limiting in description as of my personality as well. It limits me to play up to character aspects and limited the words "Hello" as in greeting, or sociable and "Orange" A citrus fruit, and chipper color. Whereas "BangBang-Coconut" allows me much more room to express my thoughts, with less in the realm of assumption being asserted on me. - Orange is not a color close to my personality whatsoever. My favorite color is blue, and accordingly I tend to associate myself with cooler colors as opposed to warmer colors. - I think "BangBang-Coconut" is not only fun; but changing my name was the suggested alternative to creating a whole new account. I will not move onto my opponent's arguments Pro Definitions: I concede my opponent's definitions. Clarifications: My opponent is justified in the "Ought" Argument, thus debate is not one of moral relevance; however if he proves that there would be no difference, this is of no credit to him. My opponent is arguing Pro on that I "shouldn't" have changed my name, meaning he affirms that on balance, it would have been better not to do so. Thus while my opponent is restricted to proving it is better I had not changed changed my name, I can prove either that it was a good thing, or that it was a neutral thing to have changed my name. Burden of Proof: This is not true, my opponent does in fact have the burden to prove that "I shouldn't have changed my DDO username" This is evident by 1. My opponent accepting to have started this debate 2. The definition of should he has offered Argument 1: Waste of Effort I am an artist, creating delightful pictures is within my nature. It is neither a strenuous effort nor a distressing one to create art. . http://bangbang-coconut.deviantart.com... I am currently content with my profile image, and when I am no longer content with it, I will create a new one. In fact, because I am no longer limited to being an orange; I can now create many more delightful profile pictures. Thus I win here on magnitude. Argument 2: The name of his youtube account is HelloxOrange a) I debate exclusively on DDO, there is no-one whom has seen only my youtube videos b) I have received absolutely zero e-mails regarding my you-tube account in my entire you-tube career. Again, I only used it for DDO. And to add onto this point in negation, it would be incredibly simple to just create a new youtube account. And even if I where to continue using the same account, I'm more sure than not that no-one will be too thrown off by my using a youtube account with an alternate name. In fact since BangBang-Coconut is such an uncommon name, I'll have an easier time setting this account up. In fact, -> . http://www.youtube.com... Argument 3: Justification I don't need to be on this site, but I am because I want to be. I fill no satisfaction other than my own from being a member of this site, and the same is true with other users on this site. Secondly, many users don't feel the need to change their username, especially novices; they simply decide to change accounts. Third most users don't even know what methods must be used to change their accounts/ a) I don't believe any-one is confused at the moment, we are fine. b) The response to have my name changed was nearly immediate; again we are fine/ In conclusion: I have successfully filled my BOP, as well as shown my opponents, and I have with my opponent's arguments.