Evolution VS. Literal Creationism (PART ll)

Yolo, Con. I suppose that since you did not copy and paste your previous arguments I shall just rebut what you gave in the link. So here we go. You said: "First, I would like to prove how evolution is real. In a shocking discovery, we share 98.6% of our DNA with an ape. (1) if you click into link, you can barely tell the ape and human chromosome apart! Yet, when you compare it to a mouse's chromosomes, you can clearly see the difference. This proves that the ape and humans are greatly related. This proves evolution. Still not satisfied? Well, we should prove evolution using man's best friend. It is proven we share 5% of our genome sequence with dogs and mouse. this again proves evolution. Even dogs and mice have a scientific similarity!" A new report of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests that the common value of 98% similarity of DNA between ape and human is wrong and misleading. [1] Did you know that we humans share 50% "common" DNA with bananas? 1. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes while chimpanzees have 24. Evolutionary scientists believe that one of the human chromosomes has been formed through the fusion of two small chromosomes in the chimp instead of an intrinsic difference resulting from a separate creation. 2. At the end of each chromosome is a string of repeating DNA sequences called a telomere. Chimpanzees and other apes have about 23 kilobases (a kilobase is 1,000 base pairs of DNA) of repeats. Humans are unique among primates with much shorter telomeres only 10 kilobases long.7 3. While 18 pairs of chromosomes are "virtually identical", chromosomes 4, 9 and 12 show evidence of being "remodeled."5 In other words, the genes and markers on these chromosomes are not in the same order in the human and chimpanzee. Instead of "being remodeled" as the evolutionists suggest, these could, logically, also be intrinsic differences because of a separate creation. 4. The Y chromosome in particular is of a different size and has many markers that do not line up between the human and chimpanzee.1 5. Scientists have prepared a human-chimpanzee comparative clone map of chromosome 21 in particular. They observed "large, non-random regions of difference between the two genomes." They found a number of regions that "might correspond to insertions that are specific to the human lineage."3 These types of differences are not generally included in calculations of percent DNA similarity. In one of the most extensive studies comparing human and chimp DNA,3 the researchers compared >19.8 million bases. While this sounds like a lot, it still represents slightly less than 1% of the genome. They calculated a mean identity of 98.77% or 1.23% differences. However, this, like other studies only considered substitutions and did not take insertions or deletions into account as the new study by Britten did. A nucleotide substitution is a mutation where one base (A, G, C, or T) is replaced with another. An insertion or deletion (indel) is found where there are nucleotides missing when two sequences are compared. You also said: "Here you can see the images of the human, mouse, and ape chromosomes. As you can see, this points towards evolution, as you can barely see the difference between the human and ape chromosome, but you can clearly see the difference between the mouse and the human." You then gave pictures. Then why do we have emotions and feelings and concepts and language, while apes don't? This can be explained through the Bible in fact, because there's a reason it wasn't apes who built the Tower of Babel [2] and suddenly began speaking many languages! "Here you can see the similarities of our brain. However, you will see our brain is considerably larger. This gives us the power to communicate and give us a sense of right and wrong." You then gave pictures. A bigger skull has NOTHING to do with the power to communicate. "The science of forensics disproves Adam and Eve 100 times over. If we are from Adam and Eve, We would practically be cousins with everyone in the world! No. This is scientifically impossible. Instead, forensics states that we are not all related. Adam and Eve also don't explain race. If we are all descendants from Adam and Eve, we would all be one race. Adam and Eve states they have two sons, Kain and Abel, but, WHERE THE HELL ARE THE GIRLS?!???!?" So you say we are related to apes but then you say we are not related to fellow humans? Where's the source for 'it's scientifically impossible.' [3] Oh and yeah we're assuming that Adam and Eve had more children than just Cain and Abel, and even though it's odd, Abel probably had sex with his sister. Last rebuttal of what you said: "It is also said Adam and eve knew how to speak, but even cavemen had no idea of the simplest languages! Wouldn't Adam and Eve have taught their children to speak their language? They also say that Adam and Eve eat from the tree of knowledge, yet, man has never found a tree that give knowledge of everything in the universe! The tree had a fruit, which means it probably had seeds, which would have made other trees similar to it, giving infinite knowledge of everything. They also say that the snake spoke at one time, yet, the snake has no vocal cords! (5) There is also evidence that the Earth is older than 4,000 years. Human footprints believed to be 40,000 years old have actually been older! It is 51,000 years old. (3) Even a tree shows the Earth is older than 4,000 years! (4) That is all Adam and Eve should be taken as. A story." About cavemen: http://answersingenesis.org... I don't know what to say about the tree thing cause you are acting like a troll! The snake was the devil and does Satan have vocal chords?? There is evidence that if the earth was older than 50,000 years old it wouldn't be like it is right now. There are fossils/bone and the galaxies that disprove evolution! [4] In response to your rebuttal last round. There is no foundation to being a Christian if you don't believe in the Bible. Give me one reason you believe in the Christian God if you don't believe any of the Bible is true! [5] If you honestly don't believe that the book I quoted from is real and/or you've never heard of it, I'll provide the link: http://en.wikipedia.org...(book) BTW bias sources are OK as long as the content is fact and logically sound. If you say I have flaws in a debate, that will lose you conduct points plus you never said where the flaws were! Thank you and good bye. [1] http://www.davidicke.com... [2] http://www.biblegateway.com... [3] [4] http://rationalwiki.org... [5] http://www.google.com...