The Bing Bang does not contradict Catholic Teaching

Leaving out paragraph one as it's a debate for another time. Paragraph 2 So your entire point in this paragraph is that telling them the truth would have robbed us of some sort of emotional satisfaction in discovery? The problem with your hypothetical "what if you had created the universe" analogy that makes it unanalogous with Christianity is that not every human being is dependant on your concept of a god. This paragraph is basically just an entire appeal to emotion fallacy and theres no real sense going through all of it as it's basically just "Well if he had told us what happened we wouldn't get to x, y , and z. " Although there is one glaring problem I wish to address. If god had wanted us to know but didn't want to rob us of discovery why did he have to lie? you still haven't addressed this fully and you still have yet to refute the point that what the Bible teaches and what the Big Bang Theory teaches are basically complete opposites. And I made THAT point back in round 2! Even if god had wanted us to find out for ourselves how he made the universe why did he have to go "Well I did it in seven ect ect ect. .. " Imagine if everyone had read that and gone "Well that's what happened no sense fact checkin that. " We'd all still believe the Earth was made in 7 days! But seriously if he had actually wanted us to find out he could have just gone "Well I'm not gonna tell you know because you wont get it but later on in time everything will become clear. You just gotta figure it out yourself. " Paragraph 3Yet again you concede that the Church just compiled the Bible into what it is and didn't actually "create" it. See it's like this. If the Catholic church had written 1 or 2 books from the Bible then they would have created part of the Bible. Not the whole thing, just part. If I make a giant collection of Rohl Dahl poems that I like and compile them into what I call "Dahl Poetry Spectacular" that doesn't mean I "created" the book. It just means I threw a bunch of poems that someone else created and put a new name on it. Paragraph 4This has been being argued among people for quite some time but it's the widely accepted notion that the actual Catholic church was not founded untill around 325. Yes people taught part of what the Catholic church teaches for centuries before hand but they didn't teach anything about the Saints or worship the Virgin Mary before the actual belief system came around in 325. To be clear the apostles and others who taught these things were just CHRISTIANS not Catholics just like the Romans didn't persecute Catholics they just persecuted the CHRISTIANS. Paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 Well I brought up the fact that they were Jewish just to rebut what you were saying that Catholics created the bible. I wasn't going to use it against the Bibles authenticity and I don't even think you COULD use it against it's authenticity which means this entire section is pure speculation and irrelevant rambling. Trust me if I wanted to invalidate the Bibles authenticity Id use the hundreds of contradictions within it's own texts and the historical and scientific errors it posseses, not the race of the people who wrote it. Paragraph 8This entire paragraph is just sort of a personal attack on something where YOU tried to dictate what I meant by something I said. Which is just crazy. That is in fact what I meant back in round 3 I just worded it really bad and I apologize for that. Trying to twist my words doesn't exactly help your case though. Paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13This is all just irrelevant conjecture and hypotheticals involving what can and can't get you excommunicated and what does and does not make you a real Catholic. None of this even mentions anything to do with the original topic. Paragraph 14 and ConclusionThere is no "Intimate connection between the Big Bang and Catholicism" There is an intimiate connection between the man who CREATED the Big Bang Theory however the theory itself and the church have little to no connection. You even stated this yourself he preferred to keep his science and religion separate which brings me back to my original point, the religion of a perosn making a discovery is irrelivant unless the discover was made through or because of his religion. This entire debate pro has done nothing to refute the fact that what Catholicism and the Bible teaches as the start of the universe and what the Big Bang teaches is so drastically different it's surprising that it's even questioned if they're related. The Bible and Catholicism teaches that the Earth was made in 7 days by gods hand while the Big Bang theory states that is was made form a rapidly expanding singularity. Pro has dont nothing to discuss or refute this and has instead filled this with irrelevant discussions and conjecture.