Batman is better than iron man

So apparently my Batman Vs. Iron Man blog managed to get revived yet again (LP), and of course with that I was expecting and awaited for the mass of Batman fanboys to follow as usual. Now it has been a while since I have bashed Batman, but I feel that the time for impartiality is over. I like to find a fine line between logic and reason, but it's hard for that to get across when the topic is Batman, so I have decided that I would give you all the reasons Batman is better based on your responses to that blog. 1. First reason Iron Man is better is the fact that Batman may be smart, but he sure as hell isn't smarter than Stark. Yes Batman is a world level forensic scientist and strategist, but that's no where as smart as Iron Man who could do things Batman could only dream of and more. You can say Batman can think of any way to beat Iron Man, well guess what? Stark wouldn't be a genius if he wasn't also an expert tactician too. Wayne can form as many plans in his head, but that doesn't mean that you would be able to pull one over someone who is smarter than you and who is just as capable of counteracting your plans. 2. There is no more "If it was Bruce Wayne fighting Tony Stark, Wayne would wipe the floor with Stark." That doesn't apply anymore for those of you who actually read his armor specs before commenting. The Iron Man suit is in Stark now, it is a part of him, it is him, Tony if anything is more machine than man at this point. If Wayne tried to combat Stark without his suit or gadgets, he would be killed faster than he would with them since Stark can even access the Iron Mans powers without fully putting on the suit. 3. Third, and this one is most important, Iron Man is not completely overrated. Do you all honestly hear yourselves sometimes saying that "Batman can beat anyone if given a chance", " He's Batman", "He's a genius", "He knows how to beat every hero", "he has a suit for every situation", come on people stop bullshitting yourselves with this hero worship illusion. I could say Iron Man is better than Batman, but I'd never dare go as far as saying he could beat every hero on Earth or beat gods, get a grip on yourselves. I mean really to those who can't make a decent argument without bringing that up: 4. Iron Man is more relatable than Batman, Batman is something that fans want to be like, not what they can relate themselves to. A hero without powers that can think of any way possible to be every hero on the Earth, plus being a billionaire doesn't seem like a hero that is made to compare to any normal person who reads the comic. I don't see many flaws with Batman besides his past and his paranoia, compared to Stark who has a flaw that "a lot" of people can relate to which is his constant fight with alcoholism. 5. At least Iron Man doesn't need a big movie and game to prove that he is so great. What I don't get is how all you who worship Batman barely read the comics, yet believe that because the movie and the game made him seem like he couldn't be beat, that that is the case.How the hell do you come up to someone who reads comics and justify a heroes greatness by a movie or videogame, can you honestly ask yourself that and see if it makes sense? 6. You talk about someone you can depend on, but you praise someone who prefers to work alone and barely trusts his own teammates to the point where he has made a plan on how to take them each down if they were to ever go rogue, does that sound like a trustworthy teammate? The only thing Iron Man has against him is the fact that he was pro registration act and turned n his best friends, besides that he is obviously the better choice to have fight by your side. 7. And unlike Batman, Iron Man is actually more fun and entertaining (Not counting the movie) to read than some emo son of a bitch stalking the night looking for justice.