Whites are superior to blacks, and blacks are dragging us down.

So in this round, I will debunk the (racial science) argument provided by Pro, which is IQ = superiority. This is the only argument Pro has made. Other statements like skull size, political, and economic prosperity of Africa, which have NO LINK that advance the two major points: (1) Whites are superior to blacks (2) Blacks are dragging us down [Pro has not provided and reasons, claims, or evidence for this, and must since BOP is 100% Pro’s] Where is Pro’s evidence? Pro makes a number of statements with numbers and statistics. Where is the information coming from? I do not know will assume it is either made up or not a reputable academic source. Pro provide zero citations for any of the information. Below I ask for the citation, author, and where the information provide can be accessed. If it is not provided in the next round, Con will assume it is invalid, likely false, or simply made-up. Evidence is not evidence, if it is not provided, making it impossible to evaluate for accuracy or the origin of the information. Specific evidence Con calls into question, here is the relevant quote from Pro: From Round 1: [“…Whites have always been the most intelligent/creative of any other race. We also were great fighters/military strategists the world has ever known. Yes, whites are superior in this regard compared to non-whites. And now this alien elite is making every attempt to morally degrade every facet of White history and culture, undermine the morality and kinship we once had with each other.”] “…have always been the most intelligent/creative of any other race.” [Con disputes this evidence; it is not evidence but an opinion and conjecture. Please provide historians, anthropologists, psychologists, etc. that agree this statement; otherwise it is personal conjecture, which is not valid in a debate. From Round 2: Evidence Con calls into question [“I will now explain what makes up these IQ differences. Whites have bigger and better functioning brains therefore they have higher IQ's. Blacks being an evolutionary dead-end have 15-20% smaller brains, like I said before this is abundant with IQ.” [Please provide the source of this information. I do not accept its validity, accuracy, or impartiality] [I also call the quote below into question. What is the source of this information, who is the author?]: [black average IQ in America is 85 while the average of whites is 102. Having a high IQ is a good predictor of success, not just in education jobs and training. But also in stable marriage and family structure. low IQ on the other hand predicts many negative outcomes. Including child abuse, crime, poor health, having a child out of wedlock, getting a divorce before 5 years of marriage. The negatives I just listed are what the black race is best at.] VOTERS SHOULD NOTE PRO’S SOLE LINK TO A WEBSITE PROVIDES A PAGE WITHOUT CONTENT Higher IQ = Superior? Pro stated that there are discrepancies between the IQ scores of whites and blacks, although does not provide a verifiable source. Cambridge psychologists Earl Hunt notes these discrepancies can be attributed to other variables including health, wealth, and education.[1] Jefferson M. Fish is PhD Professor Emeritus of Psychology at St. John’s University, where he served as department and also director of the PhD programs in clinical psychology and his book, provided [in a footnote below] debunks a series of myths, including the following: Here are some of the myths dealt with:[2] * The myth that humans are divided into Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid races * The myth that people cannot change their race * The myth of the tragic mulatto * The myth of biologically based differences in intelligence among the races The New York Times, has a good excerpt, from a piece entitled “All Brains are the Same,” which also investigates the history and the false assumption put forward by individuals linking IQ and race. Here is a brief quote, also explaining discrepancies: “In fact, the evidence heavily favors the view that race differences in I.Q. are environmental in origin, not genetic.”[3] Here is another relevant quotes from the piece that rebuts the claims made by round about brain size and intelligence: “Nearly all the evidence suggesting a genetic basis for the I.Q. differential is indirect. There is, for example, the evidence that brain size is correlated with intelligence, and that blacks have smaller brains than whites. But the brain size difference between men and women is substantially greater than that between blacks and whites, yet men and women score the same, on average, on I.Q. tests. Likewise, a group of people in a community in Ecuador have a genetic anomaly that produces extremely small head sizes — and hence brain sizes. Yet their intelligence is as high as that of their unaffected relatives.”[4] Moreover, a Salon article explores the various ways that IQ tests are flawed and can be manipulated, analogizing to the board game Scrabble: “Let’s say you learn a new game, such as Scrabble, and the first time you play you do really great (beginner’s luck). All else being equal, the next time you play you’ll probably perform closer to average. Same thing if you performed really poorly the first time. Chances are, you’ll perform better next time. This applies to any form of measurement. Sports rookies who have an amazing first year are rarely as hot the second year. Even the “linsanity” of Jeremy Lin cooled down. It’s a statistical fact that initial expectations, based on a single number, can’t be trusted.”[5] Con has provided five source legitimate sources that can be checked out by voters and by the other side. They have been properly cited and available for anyone to look at and contest. Con’s sources= 4 links, 2 (books published by experts with PhDs and two publications, The New York Times and Salon.) Pro’s = 0 (non-verifiable pieces of evidence cannot be assumed to be true or valid. CON WILL DEMONSTRATE HOW ILLOGICAL THE PRO’S LOGIC IS USING THE EXAMPLE OF COLIN POWELL/CONDOLEEZA RICE AND HILLIARY CLINTON AND JOHN KERRY: Pro states that blacks from lower IQs and brain sizes to whites and therefore they are inferior to whites Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice [blacks] are inferior to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry [whites] because according to Pro Rice and Powell have smaller brains, smaller IQs, and are therefore inferior to Clinton and Kerry. [Pro must accept this because that is his entire argument, or not accept it, in which case Pro undermines everything put forward thus far] PRO HAS YET TO ADDRESS THE SECOND PART OF THE DEBATE: HOW BLACKS ARE DRAGGING US DOWN. BOP is 100% Pro’s [1] Earl Hunt, Human Intelligence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) Page, 408-410. [2] Jefferson M. Fish, Race Intelligence: Separating Science From Myth (New York: Rutledge, 2001) [3] Richard E. Nisbett, “All Brains are the Same Color” The New York Times, December 9, 2007 http://www.nytimes.com... [4] From link provided above [5] Scott Barry Kaufman, “IQ test hurt kids, schools—and don’t measure intelligence,” Salon. Sunday, 7, 2013. http://www.salon.com...