Evolution is true, Creationism is false.

No, I do have more proof. I was not online during that round, and I apologize for that.There are two types of science, observational science, which involves the world as it is, and historical science, which involves the world in the past. As none of us have lived in the distant past, we are merely assuming what has happened. The Book of Genesis was written by Moses, a prophet of God. God spoke to Moses, and Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible, which includes creation. That is a firsthand account of the start of mankind.You state that we have the best intelligence in nature. Explain why, if we have said intelligence, we are destroying the world with war, pollution and all of the other man-produced problems that were caused. We consistently repeat the same mistakes over and over again, throughout history. The Bible states that it is because Adam and Eve ate from the forbidden tree, that humans discovered sin, but it appears that science has no evidence regarding this.You state that science keeps an open mind. Then why, if it keeps such an open mind, does it reject creationism? Palaeontology may prove that dinosaurs once existed, but how do we know whether or not they coexisted with humans. Carbonic dating could help, but is not necessarily reliable. Biogeography is just false. Organisms are in those places because God put them there. Don't invasive species also counteract biogeography? Embryology is also not true. If the human embryo has gills, that is just because it needs to be able to live in the womb for nine months. Fish have gills because they have to live in the water all their lives.https://answersingenesis.org... This here is a source as to why Neanderthals did not exist and here is another: https://thebibleistheotherside.wordpress.com... You state that there are over 6000 fossils of early human remains. That still does not prove that Neanderthals existed. Those could be disfigured, diseased or damaged remains. They weren't on the "evolutionary line to become Homo Sapiens," because they were Homo Sapiens.http://io9.gizmodo.com...This was the site that stated that the Second Law of Thermodynamics prohibits evolution. After looking up the Second Law of Thermodynamics, I must agree with you in saying that the Second Law of Thermodynamics does not have anything to do with this topic.Another thing is the Five Proofs of the Existence of God by Thomas Aquinas. https://en.wikipedia.org... Motion: Some things undoubtedly move, though cannot cause their motion. Since, there can be no infinite chain of causes of motion, there must be a First Mover, not moved by anything else, and this is what everyone understands by God. Causation: As in the case of motion, nothing can cause itself, and an infinite chain of causation is impossible, so there must be a First Cause, called God. Existence of necessary and the unnecessary: Our experience includes things certainly existing but apparently unnecessary. Not everything can be unnecessary, for then once there was nothing and there would still be nothing. Therefore, we are compelled to suppose something that exists necessarily, having this necessity only from itself; in fact itself the cause for other things to exist. Gradation: If we can notice a gradation in things in the sense that some things are more hot, good, etc., there must be a superlative that is the truest and noblest thing, and so most fully existing. This then, we call God. Ordered tendencies of nature: A direction of actions to an end is noticed in all bodies following natural laws. Anything without awareness tends to a goal under the guidance of one who is aware. This we call God. I am going to ignore that last comment about my God, my beliefs and my religion. I am done with this round.