USA Unilateral Military Force Is The Best Thing To Do To Prevent Immediate Nuclear Proliferation

Aff I affirm the resolution. Resolved: USA Unilateral Military Force Is The Best Thing To Do To Prevent Immediate Nuclear Proliferation Immediate:Right now Nuclear Proliferation: the spread of nuclear weapons, technology, and nuclear applicable information. Our standard is whichever can best uphold the promotion of U.S national security wins this round. C1: Irrational leaders A) North Korea"s leader is irrational. (http://www.businessinsider.com... (APR. 3, 2013) According to an article in the Business Insider by Brett LoGiurato, political reporter for Business Insider that has degrees in newspaper, online journalism and political science, said that: The Daily Show's Jon Stewart mocked North Korea's recent war-mongering on Tuesday, questioning whether the country would really want to get into what would amount to a "rebound war" with the United States. Last week, North Korea released photos that included a map of targets in four U.S. cities, including the bewildering Austin, Texas. IMPACT: If North Korea were to acquire more or better nuclear weapons due proliferation, this will lead to disastrous consequences for South Korea and Japan. Because Kim Jong Un isn"t a rational leader, he would most likely launch nuclear weapons to other countries without thinking of the results it will make for his country and citizens. B) Other countries with irrational leaders will buy nuclear weapons. (http://www.eutimes.net...) (Jul 26th, 2012) According to an article on EU Times: A report has unveiled that Saudi officials are trying to strike "a secret deal" with Pakistan to buy nuclear weapons from the Asian country. Citing the recent meeting between King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and Pakistani Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf in Jeddah, United Press International (UPI) said that "these events heightened speculation Riyadh is trying to strike a secret deal with Islamabad to acquire nuclear weapons." IMPACT: Many countries who buy these weapons from the black market tend to be irresponsible. If they were to get nuclear weapons, it would lead to a higher risk of them engaging in a nuclear war with their rival country. C2: Terrorists will acquire nuclear weapons. A) Terrorists will buy these Nuclear weapons. (March 15, 2012 KENNETH C. BRILL) http://www.nytimes.com... An article from NYT by KENNETH C. BRILL an U.S Ambassador to the IAEA said: At least four terrorist groups, including Al Qaeda, have demonstrated interest in using a nuclear device. These groups operate in or near states with histories of questionable nuclear security practices. Terrorists do not need to steal a nuclear weapon. It is quite possible to make an improvised nuclear device from highly enriched uranium or plutonium being used for civilian purposes. And there is a black market in such material. There have been 18 confirmed thefts or loss of weapons-usable nuclear material. In 2011, the Moldovan police broke up part of a smuggling ring attempting to sell highly enriched uranium; one member is thought to remain at large with a kilogram of this material. IMPACT: If terrorists acquire nuclear weapons through the black market, it would result in a massive increase of death due to the nuclear weapons being spreaded to irrational leaders. B) Terrorists can steal nuclear weapons. (Julian Borger Monday 12 April 2010 14.52 EDT) http://www.theguardian.com... An article on The Guardian by Julian Borger an editor for the Middle East says: Pakistan yesterday came under increased pressure over its nuclear arsenal when a Harvard study warned of "a very real possibility" that its warheads could be stolen by terrorists. The rising concern about poorly-guarded nuclear weapons and material was the subject of an extraordinary two-day summit which began in Washington yesterday. Last night, Ukraine became the latest country to volunteer to give up its stores of highly enriched uranium (HEU), which can be used in weapons, and switch its research reactors to low-enriched uranium. IMPACT: If nuclear weapons keep on proliferating, there is a higher possibility of terrorists acquiring them. This is important because terrorists do not care for themselves or others. They thrive on destruction and the suffrage of others. Nuclear weapons are dangerous, and so are terrorists.