God doesn't exist.

Before I present my argument and rebuttals to my respected and smart readers. I would like to ask for your forgiveness. I would like to apologize for quoting without attribution and any inconvenience or confusing caused when you all are reading this debate. Since I am new to this site, so I don’t know the convention. My arguments still stand no matter what who said badly about them. That by borrowing them I adopted the arguments as being mine for the debate.Unfortunately, my opponent hasn't met with his burden of proof that is to show that 'God does not exist.' My opponent also indirectly admits that the earth is being created by God. Earth by definition is a third planet from the sun. Point 1.P1. If someone has created something, then he must have existed. P2.God has created something.C1: God must have existed.Defending P1.Sir Alexander Graham Bell has created the very first practical phone. [http://en.wikipedia.org...]. If he has existed in the history, then the phone must also exist. Phone has existed in our time, so must he? If he has existed (although he is dead), so there must be something left to prove that he has existed. Phone is the thing that he left in our world. [http://en.wikipedia.org...] So, the existence of Sir Alexander Graham Bell is unquestionable. If he has never existed, then where comes phone. The current phone, today, must, at least share some similarities and using the same theory for the phone to function.Defending P2. As what we can see in the holy bible that God has created TREES, EARTH, WATER, LIGHT, STARS, HUMAN and ANIMALS in GENESIS 1. [http://bible.oremus.org...]. These are all the creation of God. Look at your surroundings, most of the creation of God was mentioned in the bible. Maybe some of the creation we can’t find or even see because it has met with extinction. Example like great sea monsters which has extinct today.It is not necessary for me to defend my C1 since all the premises are true and valid enough.Point 2. Kalām cosmological argument [http://en.wikipedia.org...]P1. Everything which has a beginning has a cause.P2. The universe has a beginning.C2. Therefore, the universe has a cause.Defend P1.Both Logic and Induction can prove my premise 1. I begin to type the argument with my hand. I begin to type because I was thinking. I am thinking because of my mind. And, my mind is conscious. If I am not conscious then I may not type what I wish for. In this case my mind is the cause. And, the beginning is typing. The only thing that is unconscious is material. Defend P2.Keep in mind that the Big Bang wasn't a sudden explosion of energy in some empty part of space at some distant moment in time. According to the theory, all space, time and energy came into existence together in that “bang.” Before the Big Bang, there was no time. There was no space. Then, suddenly, an exceedingly dense, incredibly hot, infinitesimal ball of something – everything – appeared somewhere, somehow for reasons unknown and began to expand rapidly with our whole world inside of it. But, who cause the explosion? Material is impossible to exist before the Big Bang. Defend Conclusion 2: All materials are contingent on the universe. A conscious cause fulfils the condition of immaterial. God has created the Big Bang.Point 3.God is omnipotent and he preserves the universe.First law of thermodynamics: The total amount of energy in an isolated system is conserved.Second law of thermodynamics: The entropy of the universe tends to a maximum.If the amount of energy has is limited, then the amount of energy that can be used will be decreased or even been used up one day. Then, how can the universes exist eternally? Our universe continues to exist eternally because of something that is with infinite power preserves the universe.Physics formula.Power = Energy/TimeGod is not confined to time. “God is spirit” (John 4:24), and, correspondingly, God is timeless rather than being eternally in time or being beyond time. Time was simply created by God as a limited part of His creation for accommodating the workings of His purpose in His disposable universe (2 Peter 3:10-12). Our physical world is with four known space-time dimensions of length, width, height (or depth) and time. However, God dwells in a different dimension. It’s not that God isn’t real; it’s a matter of His not being limited by the physical laws and dimensions that govern our world (Isaiah 57:15). God exists out of time, thus it is all powerful. If the entity is not the most powerful, then he can’t exist out of time. In short, the entity must be limited to time.Rebuttal to my opponent’s point:1. My opponent claims that earth is not a perfect planet and keeps saying that it is an anecdote to be an evidence for God’s work. Trying to cover both of your eyes and draw a circle. You will not get a perfect circle. You must be conscious in order to create a perfect circle. Now, try to draw the circle with your eyes open. Perfect is defined as ‘having all the required or desirable elements, qualities, or characteristics; as good as it is possible to be.’[https://www.google.com...]We can compare our planet to the other planet like Mercury. Our planet Earth has ice water, liquid water, and atmospheric water clouds but what does planet Mercury have? It has been seven years ago that theorized that frozen ice MAY exist in deep craters at the poles. Radar imaging has detected possibilities and not enough is known of the Mecurian surface as of 2007 to make any determinations. The Mercurial atmosphere is composed of 3.4% water. [http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...]When compare our Earth and planet Mercury, our planet is perfect for human’s existence. If there is no any conscious creator that means that our planet won’t be as perfect as it would be.2. My opponent did not read the whole bible and simply judge the few verses of the chapter. I think my opponent just copies the verse from somewhere in the Internet without much understanding of them. But, never mind, I will only explain one of the parts only. I would like to advise my opponent to have a clear understanding by reading the bible before arguing without any knowlege.Matthew10: 34-36do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to turn""a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law"36 a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household. The point is that Jesus is trying to tell you that if you love your parents more than Jesus then you can't be with Him. You cannot service both masters and you must have one master. It is stated in Matthew 6:24 No one can serve two masters; for a slave will either hate the one or love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth. The person will hate one master and love the other, or will follow one master and refuse to follow the other. You cannot serve both God and worldly riches. You should be thanks your parents take care of you but if God never make people then you will have no parents and you will not be here but God did. I advise my opponent to study deeper from God’s words and you can try to understand him with your mind and your heart.3. My opponent keeps saying that I have met God. Which round or words did I say so? How do we know God exists? As Christians, they know God exists because they speak to Him every day. They do not audibly hear Him speaking to them, but they sense His presence and feel His leading, know His love, desire His grace. Things have occurred in our lives that have no possible explanation other than God. God is uncreated creator as proved in the Kalām cosmological argument.4. His argument I wanted to start something new. What makes you think the Christian god is the right one? What about Krishna? Or Buddha. If you were born in India, you'd be a Hindu. If you were born in Ancient Greece, you'd believe in Zeus, Poseidon, and the many other gods. If you were born Ancient Egypt, you'd believed in Horus and Isis, and such. It seems to me that you're religion depends on where you're born, and the way you're brought up.Then why are you saying that Christian God is wrong? Any proof? Hey, it is bad that you are insulting Christian's God.I can make this case: What makes you think the God does not exist is the right one? I am using Jesus as an example. You have freedom to choose your religion. Did I force you to join any religion no right?Good morning and I would like to thank all readers for using part of your time to read and vote on this debate. If you have been skimming, please go back to the top.