American culture should become more sexualized

Con was asked not to rebuttal until round 3. Do not give heed to con's ignorance to my first post. I will be repeating some of my points, this is not to address con's ignorance as it was intended. "The physical consequences include pregnancy and STD's...The psychological consequences can include...meaningless relationships which can lead to separation and negatively impact a possible child." This statement assumes a more sexual culture would result in more unprotected sex. As I explained, a more sexual culture would mean more openness which means more education which means more awareness which means less dangers such as these. "The psychological consequences can include social separation and isolation, depression, insecurities, anxiety..." This is a fair argument, however insignificant in comparison to the current epidemic of STDs, unwanted pregnancies, child molestation, and rape. As for social separation specifically, it might be a problem for but a few years. A change in a cultural lifestyle takes many generations, but sometimes it's just what needs to happen to solve certain problems. That being said, things such as public nudity, permitted non sexual images on TV, popular websites, and movies, and sexual openness will encourage a sort of "nonsexual sexuality" where our bodies are not viewed as objects for sex, but a part of nature and a part of who we are. "Even if these things were to easily become accepted by people this does not mean that these psychological consequences would go away." The goal of sexualizing a culture is not to stop depression, insecurities, and anxiety. These would be indirect results therefore should (and need to) be addressed elsewhere. "Changing a law does not change societies opinion on something." If I made it seem as though this was what I was implying, I did not mean to. I meant to suggest changing the laws would indirectly help slowly bring future generations to accept said opinions. In the meantime I believe these things in society should not only be allowed, but encouraged and the denigration of said acts should be discouraged. Nevertheless, this is a fair argument on con's side. "With the idea of sexualizing a culture you are giving more meaning to sex and being better at it." How so? Please note this is a prediction based on no logical evidence unlike the other predictions made during this debate by both parties. "Being motivated to be better at sex will not make you a productive person to help benefit your society." How is productivity related to this topic? This statement is irrelevant to the current subject. "If anything, we are too sexualized already." I believe we are too sexualized in the wrong respect. Media certainly pushes us to be more attractive and appealing which does cause depression, insecurities, and anxiety, but I am not encouraging a culture where people are pressured to be better; I'm encouraging a culture where people are better educated on sex. If sexualization is what indirectly causes people to become more insecure, anxious, and depressed than it's what has to happen to help our more important issues. "15 year old kids to 17 year old kids are a lot less mature than average...even 18 or 19 even into the low 20s young adults tend to be less mature and more impulsive. Teenagers and young adults are not fully capable of understanding long term consequences and often overlook them in decision making. 15 year old kids should not be having sex at all...Children this age are easier to take advantage of and often succumb to peer pressure a lot easier." The problem is most people between the ages of 15 and 25 are having sex whether it's legal or not. In fact, they're doing whatever they want whether it's legal or not. Having the age of consent anywhere between these numbers is absurd. If 15 year olds and 25 year olds are almost equal in terms of maturity and are doing the same things, but only those 18 and up are allowed, then we're creating meaningless legal criminals. Most things these kids are doing are considered victimless crimes and only directly affect themselves. If we trust 18+ year olds to take care of themselves, why can't we trust 15-17 year olds to do so? If the age of consent is lowered to 15, the only thing that's gonna happen is that they'll be allowed to do the things they're already doing. But most of this is somewhat irrelevant to the topic. The idea is that consensual fornication with a 15-17 year old (ephebophilia) is victimless crime where fornicating with an 11-14 year old (hebephilia) or anyone below 10 (pedophilia) creates a victim since children below the age of 14 sometimes don't quite understand what sex really is so it would be classified as molestation which can really negatively affect a child's life forever. The idea isn't necessarily to allow 15 year olds to consensually fornicate with each other, but to allow others to have consensual fornication with them. As I explained, if this were allowed it would slowly become more acceptable thus, hopefully, making things like pedophilia and hebephilia "less unacceptable".