BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Does our society decides what a girl is apt to do and what not? ( particularly for Indian society)

First of all, I would like to say that a girl is not meant to bear the pinion reference to Indian society, I would like to mention the irony that even after providing legal rights to women our society still lays down the rulebook for women. I stick to my opinion that society was not built for deciding the limits of an individual but for better functioning of the constitution. India being men dominated society forgets the capability and importance of women. Still, Many unfortunate girls born to an orthodox family don't have an access to education. Why does my society needs to judge my character on the basis of my actions? Is having a male best friend a crime? Why does my society doesn't overcome its conservative mind? Marrying a girl to against her wants, Is it what we call bravery? I think the major drawback for India's development is its society's prevailing views for women.
"Born That Way" Is A Poor Argument In Favor of Gay Rights Compared to Personal Liberty Arguments

It's very easy for religious types who look at the science about homosexuality and actually accept it to then think "well, those poor dears can't help how they feel, but they can choose how to behave". Sometimes they liken the homosexuality to alcoholism. http://www.conservapedia.com... They will just claim that just like alcoholism there are genetic factors to homosexuality, but that that's not an excuse to act on it. Even if it were true it would be irrelevant. Imagine if pedophilia was found to be just as genetic. Would we then conclude that it must be OK to act on pedophilia? No, we would require them to refuse their desires for the good of society. The relevant point for validating gay rights isn't "born that way" it is "it harms none". Consenting homosexuality adults are not violating anybody's rights. When we try to argue from the standpoint of "it's not a choice" the whole argument will just go around in circles with both sides preaching to their choirs. We should address it from the standpoint of the right to do what you want as long as you don't infringe on other people's rights. The only objection they can raise to this is Biblical. They can site a number of skewed studies to argue that homosexuality is a choice, and even when they admit it's not they still don't support gay rights. Gay rights activists should avoid getting involved in debates about "choice" and focus on personal liberty and that the state does not have the right to pass laws based solely on religion and people should not discriminate in the name of religious beliefs.
Instagram (Pro) vs FaceBook (Con)

GG, Wow, IDK if this is a true fact about FB, but on IG people make groups that make accounts of a tv show character. (South Park, Simpsons etc. ) Does FB do that? I know some South Park groups like that and I was actually in 2 groups. Also FB is more of a social app for your friends showing what you have been doing and not as much as Posting like Like for PS4 and comment for Xbox One. Also, again don't know if they do this on FB but saying it anyway. There is a lot of accounts that are like give aways and clash of clans or any populer game.
Instagram (Pro) vs FaceBook (Con)

Since Pro started arguing in round 1 I shall do the same (For the record, FB is a better abbreviation for Facebook than FC)*Note: Quotes from Pro are Italicized and underlined The More people that use it the better it is!Ok, well by that logic Facebook is 10 times better than instagram.As of 2014 "‘Facebook Inc.’ Actually Has 2.2 Billion Users Now — Roughly One Third Of The Entire Population Of Earth"[1] while only "200 million people use Instagram"[1] 2.2 billion is 10 times 200 million hence Facebook is 10 times better than instagram according to my opponents logic (not to discount my opponent's logic, it does make sense. Number of users does show the sucess of the company).Most people in the world do not even know what instagram is. Even village folk of India use facebook (well in my experiance anyway) or they atleast know what it is. However, Instagram is just alien to them.Facebook lets you play games, Instagram does not have this feature.I await my opponent's response.Sources:[1]https://my.news.yahoo.com...;(P.S. I don't use Instagram so yeah XD, but i still believe we can have a decent argument)
Instagram (Pro) vs FaceBook (Con)

(I don't know how ths part of typing works, so I'm gona say both things I think it means,What are we arguing about and what I'm saying for IG) We are debating which is better FC (FaceBook) or IG (instagram) Instagram is better because more people use it it's like... Kids use it too. The More people that use it the better it is! (P.S. I Don't use FC so I'm gonna suck XD)
gay marriage is perfectly fine

The Jim Spiegel argument goes as follows: 1. Heterosexual union is the indispensable means by which humans come into existence and therefore has special social value (indeed, the greatest possible social value because it is the first precondition for society). 2. The indispensable means by which something of special social value can occur itself has special value. 3. What has special value to human society deserves special social recognition and sanction. 4. Civil ordinances which recognize gay marriage as comparable to heterosexual marriage constitute a rejection of the special value of heterosexual unions. 5. To deny the special social value of what has special social value is unjust. 6. Therefore, gay marriage is unjust.
gay marriage is perfectly fine

hello i am a normal 14 year old kid... so if you respond please don't use big vocabulary. ok so i believe gay marriage is perfectly fine. although i am not gay i would defend my fellow friends, family, and people of the world on their right of happiness. i believe that gay marriage is fine because, think of it as a man who is different. that man believes in his own things and minds his own business. he does not interfere with the outside world because he will be made fun of for speaking his mind. he is also hated for doing what he thinks is right even though he is not creating crime or causing pain to anyone. ive seen in your past arguments that you think being gay is unjust. i believe taking away gays, is like taking away freedom. it ruins america. this is what is destroying america. people making up new rules to people that arent doing anything wrong besides liking a man of the same gender or female and female. please respond it would mean a lot.
Lyrical Games #4 (Alliteration Series #1 only with Letters B, G, R, S, & W)

Writin' n' willing winnin' n ' workin' wonders from last workshop Women whether whorin or wishfully worshipin' wit me on a whiptop Wreckin' it til it withers, wrestlin in weathers n' got a writ, the whistle-drop God's great in his grace gruesomely gracefully grantin' me graciousness Gods' gate are like grapes ghoulishly grievously grindin' false greatness Govs gape for grand glades gladsomely generously glidin' greedy grandness Rods rape in rages ruthlessly racially, rationally rantin' for me to reek repayments Ramrods rate rampages rudely ration-fee, recklessly, rampin to the replacements roughshods rake restages ruefully regularly relentlessly replantin retracements Baseless basements with bassin breakin' n' bakin beats because it's blatant Baseness of bracelets baskin' in breathtakin in backbreakin like it's bacon Basis for you to brace us, bashin brakin so stay blaking (1) we are as brazen Salacious in statements slammin Satan as i'm stakin all there is in the station Spacious in stations stammin not snakin (2) aint slatin in Gods spirit, it's salvation Sagacious like sages shamblin in slayton, i'm skatin' cuz ballin is the standardization Waitin's wastefulness washin wakin up til i am wastin' til the beast wakens 1. http://www.urbandictionary.com... 2. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
Lyrical Games #4 (Alliteration Series #1 only with Letters B, G, R, S, & W)

Whimsical weather wrecked my weed-smokin' weekend so I wrote a war game wilder than the World of Warcraft Wandering werewolf-witches welding witchcraft wage warfare with wayward Welsh warlocks on a warpath Got the goofy gaming idea from a genteel, gymnastic GED-gained Girl Scout named Ginny Genie GypsyShe grew up in Germany garnering good grades despite gaining global glamor as a gangster named GutsyShe socializes on Saturdays with scandalous, schizophrenic, syphilis-packin' sociopathic statesmenWhile spending several stacks of scrilla from her Swiss savings account set up by a syndicate of Saudi servicemenBetter be bold & brazen with ya broadcast ya brutish, brutal or brightly, brisk brilliant bars of blasphemeBrando, baby, was born blissful with bravado & breath-takin' blurbs like I baptized in bling Racist rabbis read riddles to rectify a righteous right-wing revolution to restore religious retributionRealistically this ridiculous like a redneck Republican practicing Ramadan & sippin' root beer as a resolutionNOTE TO VOTERS: I meant to change the proposition to 1 verse 1 round, not 2. That's why I'm only able to post one verse. But still keep the "up to 16 bars". Seeker you can "write pass" or submit. If you-all count it against me, no harm, no foul. But keep your votes based mostly on Rule 4.
Lyrical Games #4 (Alliteration Series #1 only with Letters B, G, R, S, & W)

Bible blacks out burdens, brings back bright beginnings Breakin' bags as i'm bloggin' bout beggin' with bangins Bass boomin', broken brooms, and unpaid billins God givin' as i'm grinnin' grippin' the good as it glistens Grateful i gotta a gate full of gleanin' gremlins all givens Gettin' it till i'm greedy n' gladly goudin' great griffons Gougin' out goofy groupies, grabbin' goodies n' gibbons Rememberin' as i reflect, revise, repent, n' recognize, on to remissions Rhymatically reachin' for recons n' ruthlessly request reconditions Rheumatically runnin' from ruthless requisitions n' recycled repetitions Realistically really ruinin' repugnant reproven ruckus from retransmissions Slowly slaughterin' Shadow sadistically, get into submissions Seducin' slayers into sexually stringent slick n' sick superstitions Systematically slappin' sorrows from surrealistic n' silly seditions Significantly slammin' slangin' singin' n' sinnin, screamin' suppositions Women whisperin' wishin' i would welcome em well with wholesome wordplay
Lyrical Games #4 (Alliteration Series #1 only with Letters B, G, R, S, & W)

Qualifications:Must have 10 or more debates.Prefer 18 years or older unless your win percentile is 80%+Rules:1. Miscellaneous Lyricsa. religion, sex, money, women, fame, yourself, insults, put downs, censored profanity *(limit 5 per verse as to not offend most readers)b. original compositions2. up to 16 bars TWO ROUNDS ONLY 3. Con begins R1 with his First Verse4. Judges you will be grading which opponent you clearly understood the most AND/OR which one had the most entertaining lyrical presentation.This is a test of lyrical proficiency & superiority. 2 verses, 16 bars each. If you cannot establish yourself as lyrically dominant with an industry standard of two 16 bars, then this debate is too complex for you. Lyrical Masters don't need 3, 4, & 5 rounds to "prove" they are dominant wordsmiths.Now enter Alliteration Series #1.
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

I believe there are no right or wrong answers in ethics. Ethics are moral principles that govern a person's or groups behavior. In shorter terms, ethics is what someone believes in. When you are young, your parents or guardians tell you what is right and wrong. If your parents tell you that stealing is bad for example, then thats what you grow up to believe. There is no right or wrong answers in ethics because everyone has different views and people believe in different things. For example, religion, each religion believes in different things. It doesn't mean that one religion is wrong for believing in something, it means they were taught to believe in what they believe in. Everyone has different views on life and it doesn't mean that they are wrong it simply means that they look at things differently. Personal ethics deal with a lot in our lives, also there are ethics in peoples relationships. For example, someone may believe that holding the door open for a girl is what your supposed to do. Another person may believe that is not what your supposed to do. Both point of views are not right or wrong, they both just simply think differently. Personal ethics defines and describes in a person what they will and will not do to live by them. Another part of ethics are business ethics. What defines a good business and a bad business is the ethics they choose to run their business. Each business runs their business differently than others, because one business may believe that this is how your supposed to run your business and another business can think differently. Both are not right or wrong they both just believe differently in how to run a business. There are ethics in every aspect of life. If someone believes that stealing is not bad, that is not right or wrongs its just what they believe in, the might of been brought up to believe that. I believe ethics are opinion based thats why there are no right or wrong answers. Someones opinion can't be right or wrong because thats their own opinion, its what they believe. Every single person in the world has their own opinion on things and someones opinion can't be right or wrong. Someone may say how isn't stealing a bad thing? Stealing may be bad yes, but is it wrong if that person believes in it? One can argue that but it is not right or wrong to stand for what you believe in. Thats why there are no right or wrong answers because what someones believes in is not right or wrong its just simply their own opinion. People may argue that there are right or wrong answers in ethics thats what they believe. If ethics is what someone believes in, is it wrong for a person to believe in something? If someone stands for something they believe in are they considered wrong? No, simply because thats just what they believe in. Thats why there are no right or wrong answers in ethics because ethics are what someone believes in. There is no right or wrong answer for what someone believes in. It means that is what they stand for and that is their opinion.
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

Ok I really like what you just said, about fairness and that's basically one's perspective of what is fair and not fair. How you mentioned before about bringing your beliefs outside the home or in the home? well this is what I think is ethical and not ethical. As long as your not hurting someone, either its verbally or physically and your not disrespecting anyone's culture by saying negative things about it then I guess that is most important. People have rights in this country to do what they please and that's understandable. But when they are violating others people's right by hurting them physically or mentally or insulting there customs then it is unethical. That is what I have to say about this and I strongly believe that what I just said were very sold answers.
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

I believe that sounds fair. It sounds fair because practicing in your own home treats other with respect because you are not interrupting them or interfering what they do. Also, because you are thinking before you say to offend others, and practicing in your own home also is respectful to society. But, if someone believes in not practicing at home that doesn't mean they are right or wrong thats just what they believe in. As ridiculous as this sounds, one can practice on the beach, people would argue that is wrong, but it is not because that it what that person might believe in. I said it is fair practicing in your own home but that doesn't mean practicing in your own home is right. Someone else may believe practicing outside on the street is right, but both are not right or wrong it just simply means they believe differently. When i said it sounds fair, that doesn't mean its right it just means thats what i believe. Another person could have said it did not sound fair. We both are not right or wrong we both just believe differently and have different opinions on the topic. If someone said this is fair and you agreed would you consider them right?
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

ok mark you are pointing out great things that I have said that are very controversial. But that's the great thing about America, we have a system where anything can be vetoed and we set rules that go through many branches of the government and we all have to agree as a nation if we can all live and be satisfied with the rules that are upon us. Given that, we live in a country where we can practice the traditions and customs that mean the most to us, but most importantly practice that in a respectful matter. Which means in our own homes and not in the street and being careful of what you do before offending others. How does that sounds to you Mark, fair or not fair
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

Matt, i agree with you completely with what your statement everyone has different preferences and no preference is the right one. This means that everyone has different views and everyones opinion is not right or wrong its just what they believe. You said follow the rules that society gives us, I see where your coming from but I do not quite agree. If someone believes in something, I believe they should follow what they believe in. Thats like saying if i believe stealing is bad and society tells us stealing is good we should go steal. We should follow what we believe in and what we think it right or wrong. Business is ethical because it can hurt the economy, yes that may be true, but what I am trying to get at is its not right or wrong for a business owner to believe how to run a good business. When someone believes in something, people shouldn't go and say that they are wrong for believing in something that way, they should respect their belief.
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

Mark, well sex, religion and politics are very debatable topics that can cause conflicts in our society because they are extremely sensitive topics that die together with each other in a individuals belief. If people have different views on these topics then it can cause violence and certain types of people to hate each other. Everyone has different preferences and no preference is the right one. Sometimes people try to convince other otherwise and that's when the problems come to play. That's why its ethical to have your own personal belief but at the same time follow the rules that society gives us, which is freedom of speech, but cant say things that will offend others. Business decisions are ethical because it can hurt the economy as a whole. Lastly, I do not think if people don't agree on a topic that there are wrong, its just that they have to respects others people's thought on that subject and everyone can belief what they want as long as they don't try to interfere with others customs
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

Matt, you said sex, religion and politics cause problems in society, how is this? You also stated that the owner of a store wants to do something his way but it might be illegal. That comes back to what i said about stealing. Stealing may be wrong yes, but is it wrong if someone believes in it because thats what they were brought up to believe? If the owner of a store runs his business this way it may be wrong but it doesn't mean he is wrong because that is what he may believe in. He also may believe that is the right way to run a good business. Each religion has their own beliefs and it doesn't mean whether they are right or wrong. They were just brought up to believe what their religion believes in. Sex has to do with personal ethics, its what you believe in. Politics is also what you believe in, someone may argue Obama is a good president and someone may say he isn't. Both people aren't right or wrong that is just what they believe. I don't think sex, politics and religion cause conflict because they are personal and opinion based. If someone believes in something and you don't agree do you consider them wrong?
There are no right or wrong answers in ethics.

Hey Marc thank you for challenging me on "if there are right or wrong answers in ethics" I really liked your argument and what you said how everyone has there own belief and people have different thoughts. For example, how you run your own business. That's very true, and everyone has there own preferences of what they want to do and how they want to approach it. But I think you are wrong, there is an right and wrong answer to ethics. Even though sometimes our descions is a personal again, it wont help our society as a whole get better. Even though the owener of a store wants to do something his way, it might be illegal and hurt the economy overall and that would be breaking the law and would be completely wrong. Also you were saying everyone has a right to belief what they want to believe in and sometimes these can conflict with other people based on religion, sex and politics. So these three things can interfere with a persons point of view and cause problems with our society. How do you think of this?
President Trump has some good qualities.

Rock on. I should begin by saying that I'm a centrist, not a conservative, so I could go for either party. Ahem: Abortion: The medical health of the mother only. Israel: and Jerusalem belong to the Jews, so moving the embassy is a good idea. Astrong military s needed for a national defense. Fair trade is good because why trade with an unfair nation like North Korea. Christians' and other religious rights are a First Amendment issue. Helping our vets is a moral obligation, theve served their country.
Why god exists

I would wish to i suppose retry my first attempt which was just a mere test of this website, as it is my first time using it. As i can see I am dealing with quite a few atheists, I do wish to debate but also better my knowledge of the subject. OK lets get started. 1. For your first argument you said that there was a lack of evidence for a god, which is precisely what I said you did not disprove god, you did not give an argument of why a god can't exist. Anyway I will give you an argument. 2. Everything in the universe must have a cause or creator so wouldn't that mean the universe must have a creator. 3. If the universe was made by the "Big Bang" which I assume you think then why is the universe so fined toned to have the possibility of life existing so perfctly.
Something can not be true and false at the same time

any false answer is imaginary if i take 1 stone in my hand, and then 1 more stone in it, i have 2 stones in my hand, and i have to imagine a third in my hand, but numbers are false, so the equation is considered true as i know i dont have 3 rocks in my hand language is communication, and language is math keep in mind this is about true and false and not correct and incorrect.. so you can be reading these Words on the screen? can be, but are not?
Something can not be true and false at the same time

I feel I need to do a definition of false " Not according with truth or fact incorrect" FROM GOOGLE Lets say I got a problem wrong on a test would that be imaginary? No its incorrect so the statement 'This statement is false" Can be correct and incorrect at the same time. You are using a different definition of false and once again spouting random nonsense. Yes its false that your wearing a bunny costume but the words on the screen can be true to me so that is true and false. Also lets look at the definition of true "In accordance with fact or reality" ALL WITH GOOGLE" Okay voters are you going to pick someone who spouts random nonsense or me who actually needed little explaining and put up a fight and won.