Batman is a better superhero than Iron Man

So shooting someone who is threatening a child with a gun is murder? That's absurd and I'm sure the voters agrees with me.Incorrect. In the Batman trilogy, Batman saves numerous hostages without being shot and without having to kill anyone.No he doesn't. The only time he comes close is when their are doctors disguised as hostages and he breaks the privacy laws of every citizen in Gotham. And let's talk about that. How heroic is wiping your butt with the constitution, to cover your ineptitude? That's not being the world's greatest detective, that's being the world's richest spy.But back to my original point Batman would have not been able to do anything versus those terrorist Iron Man easily took out. It's the middle of the daytime. Batman is only effective at night. This is shown in the by the bank robbery at the beginning of TDK that he never shows up for. My opponent clearly doesn’t understand the Batman universe and the fact that Ra’s Al Ghul has survived so much more than a train wreck. Ra’s Al Ghul didn’t die. I know all about Ra's Al Ghul's Lazarus pits. Only problem is that in Nolan's batverse, Ra's is dead. It's what drives the entire plot of the third movie. Once again my opponent shows a lack of Batman knowledge. The entire city was ruled by the Maroni and Falcone family, Ra’s Al Ghul would have destroyed the city anyways, and it was far worse before Batman.Only because Bruce Wayne told him how messed up Gotham was. That creates the conflict in the first and third movies. I'd rather have the mob running things than mercenaries who plan to blow up the entire city. Does he get the job done or not? Having a suit doesn’t make Iron Man more of a hero.If you can call it getting the job done. In the third film he gets his back broken is is imprisoned for months! If Bane wasn't suffering from Bond Villain Stupidity, he could have killed him or blown up the city anytime he wanted to but for the plots sake, he doesn't. Even when he sees that batman is back, he decides to do nothing.Now as for Iron Man's suit, he does make him a better hero because he's a much more effective hero. Bane, Scarecrow, and The Joker wouldn't last seconds against Iron Man, so thousands of lives would have been saved. Just because Batman doesn’t build schools in Africa doesn’t make him less of a hero and as I have already shown Batman has been doing philanthropic work for Gotham for YEARS, yet my opponent just brushes this point aside.It does make him less of a hero! Iron Man saves the world and batman saves a city. Which is more heroic?First of all, Forbes is a very respected magazine that doesn’t just randomly compile numbers. Secondly, it doesn’t matter who is richer. My point was that Batman has money to do philanthropic work, and he does.Yeah, a respected financial magazine but they know nothing about comic book characters. It wasn’t kept as a trophy. Secondly, it had a safety mechanism and it was thought to be safe. It wasn’t at all Batman’s fault.Did you watch the movie? He knew it wasn't safe, that's why he never used it.His only arguments were that Iron Man has a fancy suit and he does philanthropic work. I have refuted both arguments. No you have not. Iron Man doesn't have a "fancy" suit. He has a much more effective suit. He can fly at mach speeds, he has super strength, an advanced AI, machine guns, rockets, and lasers. He would tear batman's villians apart. That makes him better because he's more efficient. Thousands die in that batman trilogy all on batman's watch.As for the charity work, you said he only donates to stuff in Gotham. So he doesn't care about the rest of the world?Iron Man is the clear winner here.