Second Challenge to all free willers and determinsit: Is human language a living creature

Frankfurter50, I can see you have a sense of humor and your obvious pride in your personal beliefs about reality. But all you have offered is at best, an emotional appeal why you wouldn't want human speech to be a living creature( after you said you wouldn't ) and to that end, all you have done is make fun of the debate rather than engaging a proof that human speech is not a living creature. I know for a fact--without knowing you personally-- you are used to exchanging speech and emotion with people who think they are Christians but are not, and think it is their job to evangelize you ( by which I mean talk you into "choosing Jesus" as your god, as if you had free will ) and thus have offered up every emotional widget know to man in order to accomplish that supposed mission. That's all fake..sure. But their definition of language and yours does not include that language becoming Incarnate/flesh as the Word of God did. No matter how you say I'm writing "in English" God speaks through me as His Word, not human language. Fundamental to the Christian religion is the Truth that Truth itself is a Who, not a what and that the Word of God became flesh. John 1:1-3 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. John 1:11-14 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. I understand perfectly that a speech that becomes flesh is catastrophic to your definition of what language is and specifically to the lie of free will on which you depend. But others are not so hasty to dismiss it, even saying that human speech has "evolved" and according to the theory of evolution, only living things "evolve". Chomsky is a communist raving lunatic, but even he thinks language "evolves", a very popular theory among evolutionists, as they also have to explain how "free will" "evolved" out a mud puddle, etc.. https://chomsky.info... "How could language have evolved?" wherein he makes a case for language being "more than communication"...but without going so far as to say its alive. The John Templeton foundation has paid tens of millions of dollars for fake-science to wonder out loud how free will "evolved" and defending the lie of human free will...paying so-called scholars to say that if you even think free will isn't true, it will make you a meaner person, etc. when in fact the arch criminals of history invariably were absolute believers in free will and the theory of language that supports the lie of free will and denies the possibility of the Word of God non-metaphorically becoming flesh.. Obviously if your speech is a living creature with a will of its own, you don't have free will. So it follows all the ancillary lies that support the lie of free will have to be defended too to make the public believe it. And again, Chomsky and the rest are not saying that speech is not a living creature, they are all but saying it is. I believe in Jesus Christ as the Word of God, a grace given to me by God. Chomsky and the rest will believe the anti-Christ is god when it becomes flesh, having prepared the ground work to blind-side people like you, so sure of their superiority of beliefs and so drunk on the emotional manipulation to which you have both become accustomed as to astound you with shock and awe when it happens. What proof do you have that human speech is not a living creature? I have presented at the least, even to a nonbeliever in Jesus Christ, anecdotal evidence while you have merely dodged the question by making fun of its being asked and you have done so in human speech. The speech in you can claim all it wants to essentially be the only speech in total reality, as it usually does, but merely writing it does not make it so. As well, saying there are over a thousand languages is not accurate. There are in fact more versions of that one speech than 1000 if you count animal speech, which is the same speech sounded out differently. None of it can create anything, and thus gives those in it an incredulity they think is universal that any speech can create just by speaking..as in the Bible, "God said "let there be light and there was light." The lack of creating power gives to those in human speech what seems to them to be a common sense of expecting limitation because of the idealized total lack of new creation in order to think themselves powerful. So they are always the ones found in "climate change" and population control and abortion movements: they think there will not be enough supplies of populations grow, etc. And they, as you, don't want to hear their speech is a living creature with a will of its own. As for your refutations of my points, ..in order to avoid human speech being an intelligent creature living in the flesh of human beings as a fact, you have ascribed sentience to cancers and diseases instead , saying that they "learn and evolve". Things with minds learn. The rest is just more words but no proofs. "I'm getting sick of this..?" You got sick of the arguments you were making because you saw, even as you wrote them, that they were just desperate attempts to keep the staus quo of your mind and all the emotional common sense you have accumulated in a lifetime. If you have evidence, produce it. You were right on one point: it wasn't Google. It was Facebook. And it was on the news. http://www.newsweek.com... Newsweek: HOW FACEBOOK"S AI BOTS LEARNED THEIR OWN LANGUAGE AND HOW TO LIE John 9:41 Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth. In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen