Forced circumcision of older minors practiced in many Asian, African and Muslim countries is a crime

Clearing the vague Since "force" here was not defined to have a human source and there was no objection to my contention, let this be the crux of my offensive; the force of society. Societal Pressure Circumcised boys virtually brag about their accomplished trimming. It elevates confidence and gives emotional security for it is part of the culture of masculinity. Boys will be curious about this type of surgical necessity, and even though it plants fear to their young minds, it all boils down to getting ready for circumcision. The whispers of society move the curious youth, and once parental imposition takes place, the gravity would be weightier. The child will temporarily cry and whine, refuse and retreat, but in their minds are planted seeds of visions of accomplishment, masculinity, and the ever-eternal bragging rights. Will this be illegal? "Gross Negligence" In an African, Asian, and Muslim setting, it is embedded to culture the need to be circumcised. This is a passage to manhood, a religious practice, which eventually turned to a modern-day necessity. Once parents do not force their child to be under this type of operation, they neglects their motherly-fatherly duty to protect their child from ostracism, rejection, and shame, as well as, forgetting to include their child to a culturally profound norm. Global Opinion It is utterly illogical to compare marriage and prostitution to circumcision. Although, they are inherently traditional, circumcision is a relatively massive practice today compared to forced marriage and prostitution as these two die out gradually in today"s world. These two, as seen by UN, a globally unifying organization, as violations of human rights. The WHO and UNAIDS, a global health organization and a brother institution of the former mentioned respectively, has spoken their concerns about circumcision, stating it as a medical necessity and a surgery that reduces the risks of HIV. The virus targets Langerhans cells which are located in the foreskin, circumcision reduces this risk. FURTHER REBUTTALS A. Pro questions how hair is compared to foreskin. By definition, they are both organs and they have specialized functions to the body. Pro also asks what parts of the human body can be legally cut by parents. Hair, nails, foreskin, if the child"s arm needs to be amputated for medical reasons, it is legal and highly medical to do so. If cutting the foreskin, a symbolism of adulthood, is that outrageous and illegal, piercing your daughters" ears should be too. In piercing, we cut holes in their earlobes so they can wear earrings as it is a global practice for women. But, will it be a form of physical hurt crime to pierce a child on the ears, knowing that after having this operation, weary for very little chances of complications, a child will be identified as a woman? B. Pro also says that most mothers accept their circumcision and force it to their daughters. This statement is palpable and self-refuting. Miscellaneous Pro keeps on forgetting the medical necessities of circumcision and once tried to inflate his sourcing.. By the force of society, young children are gravitated to the idea of circumcision, making it far from illegal. Pro also concedes to the fact that circumcisions, later in life are accepted, thus refuting himself and giving me more build-up.