Ron Paul for President 2012

I respect your responses but before I can attempt to solve them or before I can begin the refute your responses you need to understand the root problems of these topics and how Ron Paul has the rational and a conscience to fix them. Here me out. His views on abortion address many issues that a person must face before they perform an abortion but most people get abortions because they don't want to deal with the mistake they committed. Therefore men and women should never put themselves in this position in the first place. They should be smart but most people seem to think that because they screwed up an alternative must be reached. But what about the child? does the mother get permission from the fetus to end its life (rhetorical question) of course not! Who became the judge and who has been granted the authority to take the life away? That decision is made between the doctor and the patient. Therefore the baby has no say. My conclusion along with Mr. Paul's is that doctors/patient have the power to overstep the bounds of morality by picking and choosing who should live and who should die. "If a state were to legalize infanticide, it could be charged with not maintaining a republican form of government, which is required by the constitution." So tell me whats the difference between killing a baby one minute before birth or killing a baby one minute after birth? there is no difference, one action just takes place a minute before the other but the result is the same in both situations because they both do equal harm. But a mother can be charged with murder if she kills her child. This should apply to abortion as well. I understand that people don't always make the right decisions but another person shouldn't have to suffer or be killed before they even get to experience life. Natural causes should determine how long someone lives not another person's decision. and women die from child births still but it is very uncommon. men and women should make a better decision since a girl can't get pregnant by herself. it starts with a choice. The only exception i could see abortion being appropriate is when a girl is raped then i could see a child being aborted but it is a pretty mighty power just to end someone life on command. Its like a person begging for their life right before someone kills them except a baby can't plead and has no voice. Its immoral in my opinion. The Seventeenth Amendment was ratified in 1913. Given the year it was ratified in 1913, the same year the Federal Reserve was established can't mean anything good came from the 17th amendment. This amendment was a provision which superseded article 1 section 3 in the constitution. Given this power and how Ron Paul is a strict unconstitutionalist exemplifies proof in how he takes his oath very seriously and he believes the constitution should not be manipulated in this manner or any manner. But this is whats happens. Just like its illegal to not pledge allegiance. or how burning the flag is against the law. Freedom of expression is abridged. or the patriot act which prohibits people freedom of speech. Have you heard of SOPA? or the National Defense Act? They've crafted a bill that turns America's military against its own people and suspends habeas corpus. Martial law in unconstitutional. As for bringing our troops home. This is an excellent solution to resolve hostility because of our meddling affairs in other countries. do you honestly think our troops are in the middle east to spread democracy? its just a noble lie- an excuse that our government uses to manipulate the public to justify its actions when in reality the one percent is profiting from the war. Construction companies benefit from this the most. Haliburton, Betchel and Pearson are just some, but the major ones that are most talked about underground and over the internet since thats the only place intelligent and vigilant people will talk about them. Has it ever crossed your mind why the censor Ron Paul? or why they are already talking about him running for a third party or even questioning him running for a third party? Even when he said that he will not run for a third party if he doesn't win the GOP. He wants to bring the troops home because it is unsustainable. If you have ever done research on empire, lets say Rome for example. "Though the crossing of the Rubicon is considered the seminal event in the fall of the Roman Republic, militarism has already been in place outside of Rome itself. The destruction of the Republic came as a consequence growth and expansion of Roman military power throughout the Mediterranean region. Today's military and CIA efforts are almost totally unrestrained by the U.S. congress." One can also look at Germany in 1923 during the Weimar Republic. That government wanted to fund the war by entirely borrowing which led to hyperinflation. The reason why the United States has not experienced this since the Confederate states between 1861-1865 is because the United States is the reserve world currency. Other countries must create currency equal to the dollar. It took 4,200,000,000,000 to make one dollar in December 1923. This was the result of "borrowing" to pay for the war. Borrowing just meant printing money(Germany borrowed money from France too) but anyone that understands inflation understands that you can't spend your way out of debt. You or I can't, so why does this allow the government to do so? it doesn't. But that is the misconception that most people don't understand. So if debt isn't a good indication that we should pull out of the middle east, surely there are moral reasons which justify a pull out. There is so much involved with these aggressive wars which are preventive. When the troops return home there are obligated to a job or they will receive one priority over another person. A good start would be to bring back the job here in the U.S. instead of having them in other countries but the reason why they ship jobs overseas is because it is much easier to pay someone in china to do it. Immigrants that come here for labor jobs take the jobs away from people who don't want to work those jobs because of low wages. Those are too examples how people in the U.S. are unmotivated. The jobs lie here, its just people are to damn unmotivated to care and would rather suck off the government for economic purposes. it the victim mentality that people develop. Read Liberty Defined by Ron Paul. The sentences is quotes are from this book. Ron Paul is the real deal. Seriously people need to open their eyes. People say Ron Paul is a nut but people are to ignorant to sense this genuine man. Its disappointing.