Cloning human is unethical and unjust.

But there are lots of points that I slightly disagree with my opponent: "There is nothing inherently immoral about giving someone a present. However, when that present is a grenade with the pin pulled out, THEN it becomes immoral. The fact that it is immoral to give someone a live grenade does not invalidate the morality of performing acts of giving. There are two parts of the act: Giving, and the danger of the grenade" _ So my opponent here believe it is ok to give thee grenade for the present, just don't pull the pin, ok here are the problems with that analogy: 1) How can you give a grenade, a dangerous present to a person whom you loved? 2)What is the purpose of that grenade anyway if you can't pull the pin? So let me make another analogy like that one, imagine I have a son, he's addicted to drug, badly, and in his 16th birthday(or any birth day, I don't care), I give him my present, when he opens that present, it's a bag full with heroin. Now can I say:"It's ok to give my BADLY ADDICTED kid that bag of heroin, just as long as he doesn't open it. "? Giving is good, but you also must know the danger of that material that you give that person, either it had been already activated or not. (Hope you see that deeper meaning of this) "Similarly, there is nothing inherently immoral about human cloning. Not even the cloning of a complete person. The immorality comes from what happens AFTER the person is cloned. If we treat the cloned person just like a regular person, then there is no immorality. " _Similarly, there's immoral about human cloning a complete person, as you have given the grenade to the hand of a little kid. He will pull the pin and the percentage is high. You can't give somebody something that you already know that it is dangerous, such as the grenade. "My opponent argued that there would be enslavement. This has NOTHING to do with human cloning. My opponent is not giving evidence for why human cloning is immoral, he is giving evidence for why SLAVERY is immoral. We have the choice not to enslave clones. " _That's when it gone bad, back when the slavery laws of the African Americans had not be abolished my President Lincoln, do you think people still have choices to choose whether they can enslave the African American or not? That's what bad, the choice, they have the choice and I believe they will use that choice, as you state. "My opponent argued that if we could clone children, it would be immoral to all the orphans. You know what? Maybe my opponent would like it if people who wanted to give birth to their OWN children should be jailed too. For every parent who decides to give birth to their own child, there goes another potential home for an orphan. My opponent is arguing everything *except* what he is supposed to be arguing. " _ I agree, sorry for this part of the argument. "My opponent argued that we would use complete human clones and mistreat and abuse them. Again, my opponent is NOT talking about the ethics of human cloning. He is talking about the ethics of mistreating and abusing people. After cloning people, we have the choice NOT to mistreat and abuse them. One thing does not immediately lead to another. " _ Well, because we have a choice, that's what bad, because we tend to choose the wrong way, we tend to choose the unethical way and I believe once the clones are out, they will not be treated fully as a human. Now I should ask my opponent and my fellow audience, what would happen us human are immortal, and can live as long as we want? Well, seems tempting but here's what will happen: 1) The increasing of population will push the earth toward an end, also all other organisms that co-exist with human will soon disappear too, the food webs get disrupted, human begin too become starved, thirst. .. 2)All the ways that nature preserves that God preserves to help decreasing human population(old age, sickness. .. ) will soon negated by us human because we are immortal. That's what will soon happen if we can clone, if we can just donor this for that, saving people's lives, people got cured, got strong again, maybe they won't be immortal, but the point is that the increasing of human will soon beyond the balance, causes the disrupt of nature and it's balance, human cloning as you say that is "ethical" can also create tons more of human, also add fuel to that big problem. Thank you and I hope and pray my opponent will satisfies with this argument.