Free Will is better than forced will

My opponent expects me to respect him when he cusses out women in debate.org. How dare you tell me that I’ am offending you. My opponent’s only defense for my arguments is that I’ am attacking him.’ Stop attacking me. I should win because my opponent is attacking me.’ My opponent says that he would rather be like the fat person hollering in the car because he doesn’t want to exercise. My opponent says that true happiness is not paying taxes. My opponent says that there is a broad spectrum of order. *******How can I not attack him. He has a big bull’s-eye that says hit me on it. For humans, free will is an excuse for one to do what he wants to do. Humans have abused the right to free will. To counter this, forced will would force one to do what he is supposed to do. People that tend to do what they want to do seem to ignore the effects that they have on other people. My opponent feels that true happiness comes from what he wants to do instead of helping others. My opponent says that he would rather not pay taxes because he does not want to. Yet my opponent failed to realize that paying taxes helps pay for things that the government does not pay for with only their own money. Or maybe he does realize and he is choosing to do the wrong thing by not caring. Maybe he thinks that doing nothing does not matter or that doing nothing is the right thing. More examples that right and wrong is merely ambiguous and subjective. Most people tend to never learn from their mistakes. When people do learn, they usually do not keep on doing the right thing for it is too hard. People would rather do the easy things than the hard. Even if the hard things are right. If one was forced to do the right thing, then one would not have to worry about what was wrong and what was right. For a supreme being would make the decisions for us. I never said "We cannot comprehend what is right and what is wrong." I said that 'we cannot simply comprehend the choices between right and wrong. For both are merely ambiguous.' Extend examples from earlier. Simply: plainly, absolutely merely: simply, just ambiguous: having more than one meaning. ENCARTA DICTIONARY However, this is what you said. "...our perspective being forced to do the "right" thing wouldn't be better in our perception because we wouldn't be able to tell that we were doing better things in comparison due to our failure to comprehend what is right and what is wrong." This statement means that from a normal person's perspective, if he was converted to a person who does everything right, then he would not be able to tell the difference between right and wrong. By you saying the words comparison due to failure to comprehend, one must assume that this is what you meant. I said then that one would not need to know the difference between right and wrong anyway. If one were doing everything right. My opponent says that order is not clearly black and white. Is this his only explanation for order. The only defense he has is that order varies. He says that we are getting things done. My opponent sounds like he saying ‘what is the worst that can happen before order is not called order anymore.’ Face it there is no order. - We are losing control of the world. Caused by man. - The world would be better if everyone was forced to coexist. - Global warming exists. War exists. There is no order. My opponent sounds like George W. Bush. Things are getting done; Mission Accomplished.