911 was an inside job (2)

"1. President Bush's statements both contradict and mimic some of the evidence." Keep in mind that not all of the evidence came to light right after the attacks. Clearer evidence may have come later, which would make Bush's claims about what was previously thought contradictory. Besides, again, Bush isn't the whole government. What he says is irrelevant to whether 9/11 was a conspiricy. Even if he said strait up "I planned 9/11", I would still be skeptical. Bush was (and still is) an idiot. ""Let's roll" Which was a phrase supposedly stated by the passenger Todd Beamer before they attacked the 'so called terrorists' on flight 93. Note - The same phase used by George Bush when he announced that America was going to war with Iraq." Why is this relevant? This is an association fallacy. Bush had an ugly face, and so did the terrorists...COINCIDENCE? I THINK NOT!!1! "2. "we can't breathe due to mace" This comment by Betty Ong doesn't make sense. If she is talking on a cell phone, she is breathing." I don't think you have to take what she said LITERALLY. And usually when people talk on phones, they breath OUT! Not IN! Besides, you haven't provided any evidence that this happened anyway. Please provide a source. "Cool, where is it?" The reaction of technician Shelly Watson - on hearing about the 'real world' hijacking. This doesn't sound like a qualified and trained military officer to me. It sounds more like a 10 year old on-line gamer who has found a new game to play" Maybe he was trying to calm the woman down? Besides, let's apply occams razor: Verbal slip up/trying to calm the woman down/whatever OR the whole 9/11 terrorist attack was a conspiracy. Obviously it's the first one. This is just ridiculous evidence. "3. How did the hijackers know how to turn off the transponders? Note -They were only trained to operate small propeller planes which don't normally have transponders." I don't know. Guess? I can't access a picture of the transponder used on the boing 767, but I would assume it had some info printed on it that prompted the terrorists to turn it off. Also, there is a thing called books. You don't need access to a Boeing 767 to know how they work. There are plenty of books (and even websites) that explain (in detail) how these things work. Though I have no evidence for this, I think it's a far more reasonable explanation than "The whole of 9/11 was a conspiracy" explanation that your giving. "4. Flight 93 - The distribution of plane pieces is inconsistent with the flight recorder information. According to the flight recorder the plane was forced down by the hi-jackers. The evidence contradicts this information. Pieces of the plane were found over an area of 2 kilometres which suggests that the plane was shot down while in the air." Firstly, you give no evidence for this besides the homepage of a website. Please give a SPECIFIC webpage, not the homepage. I'm not going to search high and low for your sources. But what your saying is absurd anyway. Let me get this strait, the plane that was planned to be slammed into a building (by the government) was shot down (with the fake hi-jackers in it) because...why? Why would they do that if it was they're plan the entire time? What was the point of shooting it down? And even if we assume that all the evidence that the plane was shot down, how does that support your claim that 9/11 was a conspiracy? Wouldn't someone WANT to shoot down the planes!? Wouldn't that be protecting the buildings!? DUUUH! "5. The four planes crashes should have resulted in the recovery of 8 black boxes. Note - Black boxes are indestructible. No amount of fire or violence of impact would be enough to destroy a black box. Thus, the missing black boxes must have been purposely removed by the government agents." Firstly, "missing" is not synonymous with "destroyed". Get a thesaurus some time. Secondly, you are presenting a false dichotomy: "Either the black boxes were destroyed OR the evil reptilian FBI agents removed them". This is simply FALSE. With the amount of rubble present at at least 3 of the crash sights, it's a no-brainier why they were missing. Thirdly, you still present no evidence for any of these besides home pages. Like I said, provide SPECIFIC sources for your claims. Not just website home pages. I'm not going to search for evidence of your claims. You provide it.