Anarcho-Socialism/Communism is possible under certain conditions

In order for this society to work, everyone in it would have to voluntarily give their possessions to others. Some people are generous, but most people would not want to do this. If a person didn't want to work, then what would happen to them? Would someone punish them? If so, who? Wouldn't that person be higher up than the person being punished?The main way that this would be impossible is this right here- "This is possible through the dissolution of nation-states and borders. What Ancoms believe is that the world should be transformed from states, which have organized borders and coercion, to what are called communes. Communes are small, self-governing city-like governments in which there is no government hierarchy. All citizens are equal, and have an equal say in government."Which is, of course, impossible. You would have every nation just decide to not exist anymore? How would that happen? Even supposing that all of the socialists, communists, and anarchists combined (Even though some people are Anarcho-Capitalist) they would not be able to fight off the governments, combined with all of the other citizens who would be against Anarchy, Communism, or both. The other problem is that Communism and Socialism, in every real world application, has devolved into an autocratic regime. Stephane Courtois, author of "The Black Book of Communism" considers Communism and Nazism slightly different totalitarian systems. He claims that Communist regimes have killed "approximately 100 million people in contrast to the approximately 25 million victims of Nazis".[1] Courtois claims that Nazi Germany's methods of mass extermination were adopted from Soviet methods. This claim is backed by his citing of Nazi state official Rudolf Höss who organized the infamous death camp in Auschwitz- "The Reich Security Head Office issued to the commandants a full collection of reports concerning the Russian concentration camps. These described in great detail the conditions in, and organization of, the Russian camps, as supplied by former prisoners who had managed to escape. Great emphasis was placed on the fact that the Russians, by their massive employment of forced labor, had destroyed whole peoples." [2] Socialism doesn’t work because it does not reflect human nature. This unnatural state of existence, by the way, is what makes socialism an ideology – it doesn’t reflect what’s real; it only reflects what’s imagined. Volumes have been written about what can be described in one sentence: The imagined benefits of socialism always require government coercion to force changes in human behavior. That effort has never worked in the history of mankind. If socialism’s benefits were real, little government coercion would be necessary to achieve them. Ordered liberty, or freedom, requires some government coercion. The difference between freedom and socialism is that government coercion in a free society conforms to human nature. The same is not true with socialism. Society is an imperfect thing, because we as humans are imperfect beings. Anarcho-Socialism/Communism will never work. [1][2] Werth et al. Margolin, p. 15.