The U.S. should improve Sino-American relations by exchanging capital cities with China

My opponent's first argument is M. A. D "1) M. A. D. "M. A. D stands for Mutually Assured Destruction. It is "a doctrine of military strategy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two opposing sides would effectively result in the destruction of both the attacker and the defender. " (. http://en.wikipedia.org......) M. A. D. is the main reason why China hasn't invaded America, and vica-versa. If the U. S. declared war on China, China would immediately take the American capital with ease, as would the U. S. with Chinas. This heightens Americas security. " _ Before Nuclear bomb even been invented, I don't see the Chinese invaders come in and invade the USA. Bond by the nuclear treaties, signed by most of the world, that included the People's Republic of China and the United States of America( . http://en.wikipedia.org... ) . If US declare war on China, China would take the DC and US would take Beijing, this not just have no improvement on our security, but can also give the Chinese an opportunity to create massive damage for our country. "2) NATIONAL SECURITY Besides from MAD which I already explained, should another nation invade the U. S. , China would send it's military to defend the Chinese Capital of Washington D. C. , as the U. S. would to defend Beijing. This forms a mutual military alliance for both sides, thus improving relations vastly. " _ If we put it in a way that my opponent is stating, this is really a sweet and mellow offer for the US, but like most of the commercial you see on TV, 9/10 of them are hard to believe. Put it this way, you invited this guy, whom you had chosen to have a friendship relationship with, now your house is a mansion, a great building, colossal, sparkling with wealth, and let's say your the one you invited is a hobo. You wanted him to have your home, and you'll live in his home. What do you think the result would be? How many materials would you think there gonna left? Are there anything you could take? None. Aforesaid, I don't think this won't improve our security, but rather give us a parasite in our own body. "3) ECONOMIC TIES U. S. corporations would follow the congress to Beijing, thus increasing Sino-American economic relations. The same would happen in D. C. Chinese business' would go to D. C. Economic ties such as these would benefit the U. S. economy as well as promote a stronger relation between the PROC and the U. S. A. " Japan-USA have such a strong economic tie ( . http://www.carnegieendowment.org... ), according to . http://www.worldsrichestcountries.com..., Japan is the richest country in Asia and also the second richest country in the world, let's just say we'll exchange our capital for economic tie, Japan would be a functional choice rather than China. "4) CULTURAL EXCHANGE The regular interactions between the Beijing denizens and U. S. politicians would promote a cultural exchange, likewise with the Chinese government officials and the citizens of D. C. " We appreciate and respect the Chinese culture, which had enriched our country with Chinese food, China Town and a lot more traditions from the Chinese, but that's not the reason why we should trade our nation for China, by doing that, it won't be Cultural Exchange anymoew but rather than the American will be acculturated by the Chinese and so forth. Base on the U. S Code TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 2B > ï¿½ 78dd–1 "It shall be unlawful for any issuer which has a class of securities registered pursuant to section 78l of this title or which is required to file reports under section 78o (d) of this title, or for any officer, director, employee, or agent of such issuer or any stockholder thereof acting on behalf of such issuer, to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce corruptly in furtherance of an offer, payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment of any money, or offer, gift, promise to give, or authorization of the giving of anything of value to— (1) any foreign official for purposes of— (A) (i) influencing any act or decision of such foreign official in his official capacity, (ii) inducing such foreign official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official, or (iii) securing any improper advantage;. .. " ( . http://www.law.cornell.edu... ) Thank you and hope to see my opponent arguments as soon as possible.