Atheists are not logically and reasonably justified in their disbelief of a Christian God

I hope the arguments I present will cause all who read to think more deeply about this issue. In order to claim victory in the argument, I must show that belief in a God is reasonable and logically justifiable and by extension, why it is unjustified for an atheist not to believe in God. There have been many arguments for the existence of God used throughout history but as space is an issue, I will limit my argument to what I believe are three of the stronger arguments for the existence of God. Principle of CausalityThe principle of causality states that something cannot be created by nothing. The universe is not infinite, as used to be believed. If it were, it would remain static. Yet it is expanding, indicating that it once had a beginning. There was a point at which there was no universe, and then there was a universe. In order for a universe to be created where there was nothing, there must have been a Being who created it, since something cannot be produced by nothing. It is the height of folly to believe that any effect can be produced without a cause. Even David Hume, a noted atheist, stated "I never asserted so absurd a proposition as that something could arise without a cause. " [1] As created beings, we are contingent upon that which created us. God is a Necessary Being, the First Cause of everything. God was not created, He has always existed. He is a Necessary Being; it is in His very nature to exist and as a being who has always existed, it is not in His nature to change. God is the same yesterday, today, and forever, and as such He has always been. I will give my argument in the form of a syllogy:1. Something cannot be produced by nothing (or, nonbeing cannot create being)2. The universe once did not exist and now does.3. Therefore, a Necessary Being must have created itMoral LawMoral relativism is a self-defeating belief, for in order to be true it must also be false (if there is no truth, as relativism claims, once might follow up by asking, is that a true statement? ). While some truths are relative (e. g. your favorite flavor of ice cream or your favorite style of music), there are truths which belong in the realm of commonly accepted morality. Most people believe that murder and rape are wrong. Those who don't are labeled psychopaths and locked up in a mental institution. If parents don't teach their kids right from wrong, they are generally believed to have failed as parents. Yet how can we know, instinctually, what is right from wrong unless there is a Moral Law Giver? And who would be qualified to give a Moral Law for all humanity to follow other than a Being who created that race of beings?1. There are things which are obviously wrong (e. g. rape and murder).2. There must be an objective moral truth, or there would be no reason to keep your word, or to do good at all.3. Therefore, only a Being who created us can create a Moral Law for all humankind to follow. Teleological ArgumentWhenever we look at a painting, such as the Mona Lisa, no one would believe that it simply sprang into existence, nor would someone believe that a building just suddenly came into existence one day. Paintings need a painter, buildings need a builder. The universe is much more vast and complex than a simple painting or even a building, so if a painter or builder is a given when viewing a painting or building, so is it a given that an intelligent being must have created this universe. The world and universe we live in has been incredibly fine-tuned for our survival. There are currently no known planets in the universe where earth-like life can survive. In order for our kind to survive, it must be in the "Goldilocks Zone" of its galaxy, in other words the perfect spot where the planet would not be too hot or too cold. Plus, the world has to have a habitable atmosphere (with plants that absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen), and the galaxy around it can't be too hostile (e. g. we have Jupiter around to deflect asteroids by its gravitational field that might otherwise impact with Earth and destroy it or all life on it).1. The world has been fine-tuned for our survival2. The world would not be so finely-tuned for our survival if left up to random processes3. Therefore, a Designer is behind the universe that was designed for us to live in. [1] Hume, David, The Letters of David Hume, 1:187.