It is reasonable to believe Alexander Oparin's basic theory of abiogenesis (aka "Primordial Soup")

This is quite annoying. You have not answered my question; you actually posted arguments on a question. Very well, then. I'll take your lack of answer as a no. Now here comes the interesting part: the actual arguments. First of all, here is a small definition for the average reader: the bio genesis is the process in which life can appear. Abiogenesis refers to the same process, with the difference that it is done through inorganic matter. Now, if we take into consideration that amino-acids can indeed be formed under ideal circumstances, as the Miller-Uray experiment has shown, it might be possible to think at first that life can originate through inorganic matter without an intelligent intervention. Let's then take a more thorough and complete look at the thing: In no occurrence have we been able to create an actual living system, would it be something as simple as "proto-life". Of course, creating a few amino-acids is yet impressive. It is, however, nowhere near the actual requirements for bio genesis. A quick, logic, and I hope, definitive example to counter the theory would be the number of genomes required to have a simple form of life. The E.Coli bacteria, easily one of the most simple form of life on earth, contain the following: (If you'd allow me to quote a link): ""The complete sequence of the genome of a harmless laboratory strain of E. coli (K-12) was reported in the 5 September 1997 issue of Science. The genome consists of a single molecule of DNA containing 4,639,221 base pairs."" (2) A simple bacteria contains more than 4,639,221 base pairs. A base pair is traditionally formed by Adenine (C5H5N5), Guanine (C5H5N5O), Cytosine (C4H5N3O) and Thymine (C5H6N2O2). As you probably noticed, those are, for the most part, complex molecules. Now, is it logic to assume that two of them they formed together, randomly, 4,639,221 times in a row? Not only that, but also in a proper order to give life to something as simple as one of our smallest bacteria? Despite that this is mathematically impossible, but there is also another problem. Even if you assumed, irrationally, that it is possible to be formed randomly, without any intelligent intervention, (The odds are the you could win a good thousand time with the same numbers at different lotteries before this can happen), there is another main problem: The way that this information is decoded. Would you assume that a Ribosome, encoded for this very precise chain of information, can appear at the same place? (1) The last situation was already mathematically impossible, with this piece of information-decoding to be added, it just becomes plain ridiculous to even think it might work. Conclusion: I must say, due to the odds being considered as mathematically impossible, that it is unreasonable to believe in Alexander Oparin's basic theory of abiogenesis. I eagerly await my opponent's answer. Vote Con! P.S: If the numbers do not convince you of the following impossibility of this situation, I might be able to do a logic argument on why it is impossible that inorganic material create information and the component to decode it. Sources: (1) -http://en.wikipedia.org... (2) -http://users.rcn.com... (3) http://en.wikipedia.org...