All schools should adopt the "Stop, Start, Continue" system

I'll go ahead and get right to it. The BOP for this debate is on the pro side, seeing as implementing this would be a change in the normal status quo. So the main portion of my efforts will go to refuting my opponent's case. The thesis of my position that this kind of plan is more likely to cause negative or no benefits than cause the benefits listed by my opponent. 1. There's too much room for actual abuse of this policy than would be room for actual help from this policy.What this policy proposed by my opponent is one that people can anonymously submit some form that tells teachers what they ought to do and what they ought not do when teaching. I would presuppose that people going onto and submitting for all their teachers that they should "Stop giving out tests and homework" and to "Start giving out free A's and candy to everyone" would be an unacceptable response to my opponent. If so, then:1) This is what will most likely be the norm. Teenagers are inherently rebellious, and school is generally looked at by the average teenager as a form of government instituted prison from teens. I certainly know that if it were implemented in my school that not only would I not take it seriously, but that the vast majority of my school would not take it seriously either. 2) Since it is anonymous, there is no way for the administrators to actually punish this kind of behaviour. I could submit it anonymously and tell all my female teachers that they need to "Stop acting like a b*tch" and "Start taking off all your clothes in class" and there would be no way to punish me for this. This would cause more problems in the system than would benefits because the school would then have to spend time and resources trying to track me down in vain. 2. Students aren't teachers, thus do not know what is best for them when it comes to education. While students may have preferences on ways they wish to be taught, these are often unapplicable to the curriculum that is mandated by teachers to teach to their students by the school district. For example, it's irrelevant if a student wants their history teacher to do more hands-on teaching because it's impossible to do so short of teaching the Revolutionary War by handing out muskets and cannons and telling them to shoot away at their fellow classmates. Teachers design how they teach their designated curriculum materials because they know what they have to teach, and know how to best get all the information across. I will now refute my opponent's case:It is important for teachers and students to work as a team.1. Refer to my first point, which refutes this. There would be no actual working benefit from this, as the average teenager would not give realistic feedback.2. There is no warrant as to why the students and teachers have a partnership to critique each other's performance. The teacher's job is to teach the material and make sure the students understand it. The student's job is to understand the material and achieve a passing grade. The student's job is NOT to teach the teacher how to do their job.Students will feel as though they have a voice.1. My opponent fails to warrant why having a voice in how their teachers teach their classes is actually something we ought to be concerned about. 2. Students already do have a voice. Through the student elections of Student Council members, they choose who represents them to the school, and thus have a voice in how the school operates. It benefits teachers as they can see where to improve.1. Refer to my first point as refutation of this. Since the average teenager would not take this seriously, teachers would gain no benefit from this. 2. Refer to my second point as refutation of this. Since students are not teachers, they do not know how to adequetly teach this to teenagers with varying points of view and aspects on life. Thus, the information they would provide would offer no real benefit.Students can put forward new ideas.1. Refer to my first point as refutation of this. Since the average teenager would fail to take this seriously, the ideas put forward would be false and mis-leading.2. Refer to my second point as refutation of this. Since students are not teachers, their ideas on how to teach the course will be misguided and ill-conceived on how to teach the material to a wide spectrum of different students. It's not all negative!1. The vast majority is negatively based.2. The vast majority of comments would be negatively based, seeing as two of the three sections ask for negative answers.3. Because the majority of the comments would be negative, the negative would then outweigh the positive.So in review, while this plan is a good idea in theory, the actual implementation of this plan would lead to largly negative results.I await the pro's reply.