Career debate: Psychiatry

FIRST THE DESTRUTIVE ARGUMENTATIONShortage (Lack of Supply) is more for Terrorist Leaders.While USA is not the world, I'm also not entirely sure that the statistics mentioned by Pro match the ones in his overly long reports.If we take the world as a whole and countries where the government have the most arms, the most ability to get intelligence (meaning there are actual unobtainable permissions required to even get to their level of gathered intelligence) and worst of all, only they can propose a canon of legislation let alone allow it to become law we have an issue. Currently the entire world excluding uninhabited areas such as Anterctica, are officially non-anarchies and thus there are people with badges and titles in countries that cannot equally compete with the super-mafia that, in any given nation, is its government.If you ask what proof I have, there is countless.NSA admits its own existence: https://www.nsa.gov...NSA has nothing keeping it in check and annihilates any opposition (which there is from majority of Americans): http://www.pewresearch.org...https://www.theguardian.com...Similar organisations exist for all nations but even worse, USA's NSA was permitted at one point to spy on the entire world bar four countries: https://techcrunch.com...Since there is no opposing 'force' to governments and even totally ideologically opposed governments such as the secular USA and tyrannical Islamic government of Saudi are close allies: https://www.washingtonpost.com...Well, if two such countries are allies, there is no clear purpose for governments as there is some larger game at play nothing to do with the wellbeing of the ideologies the parties represent.Terrorism, in history, is the only, I repeat only reason why India became freed (even the physical protests Gandhi led wereconsidered terrorism) and in any given situation where there was a nonviolent speaker such as Gandhi, it was only that they had more violent rivals fighting fo rthe same cause that anyone listened to them to begin with (so as to go with the lesser of the two evils opposing the government of the time).http://www.news.cornell.edu...Mandela was both the violent and nonviolent leader for his protests:http://www.nationalreview.com...To say that there is no longer a shortage or need for terrorism is to say that anarchy and freedom for humanity is no longer a thing worth fighitng for, which makes no sense because all that a government is, is the most organised and resourceful gang of any given nationstate. Without terrorists, people like Kim-Jong-Un and the Sheikhs of the middle east would rule on forever passing down their undeserved corrupt power to other non-elected corrupt officials. That isn't to say that being a democratic nation makes one less needing of government overthrowing, just that it is a lesser form of 'bad' government when the people elect the leaders in.Money/Income and CareerThis is just irrelevant to the debate. It is also an extremely filthy tactic since of course there's no public display of how rich any one terrorist high ranker got during their reign.Money isn't why one should try a career, a 'job' as a professional gambler if one is disciplind neough would be a fine way to live life abusing drunkards in the casino daily at the poker table. One could even get by in life being a brilliant fraud or con artist and earn more than psychiatrists do.The reason one chooses a career is the fulfillment of climbing, not just the money.Careers are for people who want their life to 'build up' to an amazing conclusion, not for people who want to grind cash every day.https://www.careerwise.mnscu.edu...Growing?Yes, psychiatry is growing, so is EVERY career field. This is a moot point as it's equal for both sides, please do not for one second thing that terrorism isn't evolving and growing, I am no fan of terrorists and the governments must up their game to overcome things like VPNs and other anonymity methods.The Benefits of Terrorism FOR THE RIGHT CAUSE Cannot even be Compared with PsychiatryThe freeing of blacks, the freeing of indians and so many other nations where terrorism was the first step in their liberation (Libyansto Gaddafi so on and so forth) and you are going to say that telling an autistic kid he's autistic is somehow equally valuableto society? Do not say 'it is obvious', provide any remote proof of this outrageous claim you make!TIME FOR THE CONSTRUCTIVETerrorist Leaders experience a level of admiration and power that even the best psychiatrist or really best of any other career cannot come near.Even Napoleon was, in the eyes of his enemies, a terrorist leader (because he wasn't any lawful authority in their land). Whether it's the Tamil Tigers fighting the abuse of power of Rajapaksa (http://www.aljazeera.com...) or the Russians who first needed Terrorism to fight the Oligarchy of rich, and later to fight the new leaders who had anything but freed them. (https://en.wikipedia.org...) Whether or not you agree with their cause, the leaders of any given movement (Whether it be Lenin and Mandela or the more malignant Bin Laden and Guy Fawkes) there is no denying that amongst their people they were revered for what they did and that they were not just seen as masculine figures amongst many women but as brilliant human beings by males and females alike.The Career is one of the Hardest to 'climb'Once you made it to the top of a terrorist organisation, you will almost always remain at the top because not only is betrayal unlikely as you get revered as some deified figurehead of sorts but even if people want to overthrow you, the climb isn't purely based on hard work but the ability to charm people and convince them that you are the deserving leader, which is a skill all on its own.It is one of the only careers where you never retire, even after the action you 'work to spread belief'.Even those not killed in actions, such as Mandela and Lenin, get worshipped after they die of natural causes for the courage they had (that is if enough people like the cause you fought for).