GodSand's *other* proof of the existence God is logically invalid

Kleptin says DNA is a rondom good for nothing pattern from the soil of this world. Even Richard Dawkins claims DNA is not from this world, he at least says it was made from aliens, however that wouldn't answer where DNA came from. Who made the aliens DNA? I may ask. Here are some intereting fact about DNA. If you were to get a minut piece of DNA and place the information, which it is, into books and stack them on top of each other, they would reach the moon and back 240 times over. All the human DNA in the world would fit into a pin head. That how good this storage device is. Really Kleptin, this is no random accidental pattern. Go get a pin head and see for your selves. DNA contains information and therefore DNA is a code. Therefore God exists. Kleptin what are you talking about here? "DNA shares similarities to what we call codes. This does not make it a code by all definitions." -- By what definitions? And how do patterns share similarities. You can not say a snow flake is information, you can not say the wind is information either. But you are. What you are saying is, if DNA seems to be a code then the wind, snow flakes, twisters, waves, the rotation of the planets seem to be codes too. That is what you are telling me. I don't see any relevance in your third paragraph. Well maybe a little, we have come to understand as humans that it was not us who came and made up our understanding of the universe but it was us who fitted into this universe. In that I mean we became to understand life as we grow older, not in a evolutionary sence but it comes naturally to us. You believe the universe was not fitted for us, I believe it was by an super intelligent being called God. Look we can breathe. Tell me why, in the most detailed information how life came to breathe and live if you think I am wrong. In a forum, not here. "Similarly, we can look at DNA and say that it is a code, and it fits the definition of a code, but it is not a code, since it is merely our description of a natural occurrence." Could a wave created a obvious, well drawn face of the beach?Show me and I'll give in to this debate for that reason alone. We can look at DNA and say it is a code, because it is one. Plants have DNA all living life has DNA, tell me, can a rock, or any other piece of the earth like water create a storage device that can hold every humans DNA on the planet into a pin head? I think you are living in some fantasy world. "DNA is not a code, it is similar to a code." How similar? Could a untrained eye tell? If not then DNA is a code. It does not take an expert in anything to seperate a code from a none coded pattern. "physical/chemical forces." Those make patterns such as waves, earthquakes, thunder storms, lightning, land scapes etc. They all lead to distruction and nothing new comes from them. DNA is a code and life comes from DNA. All the creatures on the planet are formed from DNA in the womb. Conclusion: The only logical answer to this, is that God created DNA. And I know many of you hate the mention of God. Most of you hate it because it gives you responsibility over your actions. I will expect to lose, because you dislike the notion of God. And you ask for proof which will only satifly you and maybe no one else. So God has said, "Come find me and seek me, and you will be found." Kleptin I can only say, when you see a code, you will know it is one, no further examination is needed. And people like you love to make up excuses against God's existence. Like it says, "People will believe in fables" In Revelations. You have surely fulfill that. For it can not be speaking of believers. That is illogical, but it speak of people like you. Answer this: If DNA is not a code, yet it looks like one, why is there only one look alike code? I already know what you will say, you will mention things like, it was an improbable chance of nature. Ok then, if that is right, why has it only occured once before and since it's been passed down through reproduction? You wouldn't find DNA lying about in the soil. Yet if you are correct you would. But you don't, so your wrong.