911 WAS an inside job ..........

Con has a great debating record, so I might not win the debate . However the truth is the truth regardless of who wins an argument.The truth is 911 was an inside job .How do we know this? Science. Some might argue if its science then why doesnt the scientific community come foward and state 911 was an inside job ?I would like to argue that the scientific community or mainstream thought is generally always wrong as history has proven.-The theory of electromagnestism for example was considered a crazy looney theory .-The theory of continental drift was also considered looney.-Einsteins theory of relativity etc.In almost every case of a new scientific thought or theory the Scientific community or establishment or status quo considers it looney.People have called 911 truthers looney too and most people base their belief that 911 was not an inside job soley on the fact that most architects and engineers agree that it wasnt a controlled demolition. However,'Looney' scientists who challenge the mainstream thought have brought up some very valid scientific questions regarding the collapse of the towers.These questions that were proposed have not been answered by NIST or other scientists.These questions are damning to the official theory of collapse.1. Evidence of extreme temperatures found at 911.RJ LEE an independant scientific group did a study on WTC dust .Particles that were formed or modified by high temperature indicate temperatures 'Various metals (most notably iron and lead) were melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles. Exposure of phases to high heat results in the formation of spherical particles due to surface tension. Figure 21 and Figure 22 show a spherical iron particle resulting from the melting of iron (or steel) ' - http://911research.wtc7.net...NIST has not answered how or where the temperatures came from to Melt iron or steel let alone lead...NIST denies evidence of molten steel.NIST denies molten steel because they know jet fuel fires cannot in 1 million years melt steel.The only thing that can explain molten steel is something added to the fires to increase temperature , these are called incendiaries.Therefore incendiary devices had to be placed in the towers alluding, they needed access and also high tech incendiary devices.The terrorist theory cannot explain how they made or placed these incendiaries in the towers therefore its more likely that insiders in the govt did it.-Even more Evidence of Molten steel During the south tower collapse molten material is seen flowing from the south tower , according to black body radiation a molten materials temperature can be deduced by its color.This indicates a temperature of 980C - 1050C leaning on the heavy side as it looks more yellow than orange. NIST 'solves' this problem by stating that the material was aluminium (molten).The problem with NIST theory is its impossible.Aluminium melts at 660C at which temperature is looks silveryThe problem with concluding that the liquid flowing from the tower’s 82nd floor could have been aluminum is that the liquid in the tower was not confined in a container so that more heat could be applied to raise the temperature of the liquid above its melting point. Instead, as soon as the metal liquefied it flowed away from the heat source under the force of gravity. Therefore, the color of the liquid flowing from the 82nd floor was at approximately the melting point of the metal. And therefore, it was molten iron.Here is a video example of aluminium being heated in a container to 980c or 1800 F...http://www.youtube.com...As you can see the aluminium cools rapidly to a silvery colour, as metals are a great conductor of heat.The molten material flowing from the south tower even remains orange yellow during its whole descent.Ironically for debunkers NIST knows this and agrees that the molten material is not pure liquid aluminium, and have hypothesised a different scenario to make the aluminium orange yellow..."11. Why do some photographs show a yellow stream of molten metal pouring down the side of WTC2 that NIST claims was aluminum from the crashed plane although aluminum burns with a white glow?NIST reported (NCSTAR 1-5A) that just before 9:52 a.m., a bright spot appeared at the top of a window on the 80th floor of WTC 2, four windows removed from the east edge on the north face, followed by the flow of a glowing liquid. This flow lasted approximately four seconds before subsiding. Many such liquid flows were observed from near this location in the seven minutes leading up to the collapse of this tower. There is no evidence of similar molten liquid pouring out from another location in WTC 2 or from anywhere within WTC 1.Photographs, and NIST simulations of the aircraft impact, show large piles of debris in the 80th and 81st floors of WTC 2 near the site where the glowing liquid eventually appeared. Much of this debris came from the aircraft itself and from the office furnishings that the aircraft pushed forward as it tunneled to this far end of the building. Large fires developed on these piles shortly after the aircraft impact and continued to burn in the area until the tower collapsed.NIST concluded that the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft, since these are known to melt between 475 degrees Celsius and 640 degrees Celsius (depending on the particular alloy), well below the expected temperatures (about 1,000 degrees Celsius) in the vicinity of the fires. Aluminum is not expected to ignite at normal fire temperatures and there is no visual indication that the material flowing from the tower was burning.Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials (e.g., furniture, carpets, partitions and computers) which can display an orange glow, much like logs burning in a fireplace. The apparent color also would have been affected by slag formation on the surface." http://wtc.nist.gov...However as Dr. Jones demonstrated by experiment that organic material floats on the liquid aluminum and burns up (oxidizes). Further, the liquid aluminum in this experiment was never heated to the point where it no longer appeared silvery. This experiment gave the expected result. Organic material would not change the color vs temperature behavior of aluminum.The conclusion of this analysis is inescapable. The liquid metal was molten iron...If any debunkers can show how to make aluminium orange yellow while getting it to flow from a building. Then officially this will be debunked. Even more evidence of molten steel !The evidence for molten steel goes on , to much to write down in enough words so I have to copy this link which has a great video summarizing more evidence. http://rethink911.org...Evidence of incendiaries were also found by architect and engineers for 911 truth as shown in the link .