God is alive

P1 Agree P2 Agree Q1 what is God unable to do. omnipotent means of a deity) having unlimited power. if you create something and you have unlimited power you can definitely lift it. when you make a claim please be specific in what you mean Explanation of C1: These two statements cannot simultaneously exist however in the Bible they do. This means that the God (as defined in the Bible) cannot exist based on these logical fallacies? How is it logically impossible for someone so loving yet so powerful to exist? you have to remember that God isn't a human in, this is a being much smarter than us and much greater than us you cannot compare the creator with his creation for example look at an Inventor and his invention; the Inventor made the invention not because he wants to destroy it its because he felt like something in his life was missing something that only the invention could fill and the inventor would not want to destroy its creation because he cares about it and there is a beautiful purpose the inventor wants it to fulfil. P1,2,3, Actually your future isn't predetermined because in the present time you decide what you do how you want to do it and when you want to do it that maps out your future so no it's not predetermined. explanation of P3 Really if God knows that you will jump off a building and you do then you have no free will. My explanation of P3 if the man has a choice to jump off a building or not to its his choice whether I know God knows or you know its his choice whether to do it that's free will Omniscience is not contradictory to free will for example I know you will reply to this argument its not forcing you to its just knowing what you're going to do and if you don't reply to this argument then it prove my point you have free will to do whatever you want despite what I know P1 reply: if there was nothing before the universe was created then how did all of the matter and the particles get there and how did all the matter explode if there was nothing to make the explode. P2 reply: The fact that science is being mixed in with the big bang theory is an oxymoron lets find out why I say that firstly for something to be scientific it has to be tested observed and proved the big bang theory has obviously not been observed or proven so its just a theory that has nothing to do with science. C2 reply: cannot be proven so I would say that claim is false nothing ever starts without a beginner so I would disagree with that statement. Demonstration of P1 reply: you're using circular reasoning saying that the universe created the big bang and the big band created the universe one has to come first. Demonstration of P2: it is not possible that everything in the universe was squished is impossible cant be proven also where this mass come from it must have came from someone, and you said As the Universe expanded and cooled down, some of the elements that we see today were created. So you admit to the things in the universe being created. Also how do you know the earth is 7 billion years old where you there also in school we are being taught that gravity is getting weaker this means that it use to be stronger how far do you have to go back for that to be a problem for living organisms, because of the strength of gravity was too strong it would generate too much heat on earth for life to survive. it is impossible for the earth to even be older than 25,000 years old. Irrationality is what evolution teaches survival of the fittest take whatever you can to survive. Also I would like to say it is impossible to prove something happened 1. when you weren't there or born 2. you know someone was there or there being evidence of that person who was there if you have none of these you are making assumptions. Also the coal is the physical evidence described in the book of Genesis in the bible. prove me wrong if you can. The Age of the Earth: Lies in the text books The dangers of evolution: