The Lion King is better than Frozen

(Sorry this is so short, and not very good, I made an awful decision to make this debate in the middle of my mocks, but I’m going to be finished with them by the next round so it’s fine :) ) I know you all know it, but here’s the brief plot: A lion cub is born, making his uncle second in line to the throne. His uncle, Scar then plots to kill the King and Simba so he can become king. Simba is tricked into fleeing in shame. After living in exile, he returns home to overthrow Scar and become king. The plots of both movies have some distinct similarities , but I think the major difference is that the Lion King’s plot revolved more around the actions of a villain but Frozen was more about the relationships between the sisters and Elsa’s internal struggle. The problem I found with Frozen’s storyline is that it revolves around miscommunications. Firstly, it could have all been avoided if her parents listened to the troll better and instead of shutting her away from the world , making her afraid of herself and not letting her learn control her powers, she would have just become queen and everything in this movie would have been avoided. Also, if Anna didn’t have to live in isolation she wouldn’t have fallen in love with literally the first guy she met . Secondly, I’m a sucker for good villains. Villain stronger in the lion king because in Frozen, Elsa was originally going to be the villain, but they had to make Hans evil because they wrote ‘Let it go’, so they had to re-write half of the script. Also Hans isn’t evil in the beginning because he smiles after meeting Anna, even though no one can see him, and it’s not even an evil smile (http://2.bp.blogspot.com...'s+Frozen.pn )showing he’s genuinely glad to meet her, which contradicts with the betrayal scene where he says “As thirteenth in line in my own kingdom, I didn't stand a chance. I knew I would have to marry into the throne somewhere.” Meaning taking over way always his plan…this isn’t tricking the audience as much as sloppy storytelling, and a shortcoming of the plot. A lot of people have been saying that Hans was the best Disney villain of all time, uh….no. Scar is so evil, he kills a child’s father in front of him, then makes him think it’s his fault, and orders his death. Not to mention that this was all part of a huge plot to successfully kill his unsuspecting bother so he can usurp the thorn. This shows that he was a better villain as Hans failed to fulfil his plot. Admittedly, a lot of people would say that him killing his father was inevitably going to happen (based on his first scene when he foreshadows that he’s going to do this ) bearing in mind, it’s a kids move, and a lot of kids grow up watching films where there’s an obvious villain, who’s plot fails at the last minute, avoiding death and mayhem, so having a main character killed off so early into the movie is a real shock to kid (especially since the scene’s so dramatic). In conclusion, The Lion King’s plot was stronger as it was more complex, while still being understandable for a child, because the time the lion king was made, Disney films were less focused on just entertaining small kid and more focused on whole ‘family entertainment’.(so yeah, that's it, I ran out of time, opps, sorry)