BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Rap Battle, 22: Freestyle

Yonkers- Tyler The Creator - yoI'm a f-ckin' dirty tater totbreakin' brotherhood foolsand busting nuts in hella thotsgood for you, you guys are tryna tie the knotI got bullied too much and so I had to make the bodies dropsome bitch called the cops because she smelled the f-ckin' bodies rot-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jesus called, he said it's sad to see you're starving stop eating roaches outta the carpetand spending nights at What50's apartmentJediDude dipped when this vigilante dissed his familyif only he knew that night I danced around his sister's pantiesthis d-ck sure did tickle the little's hoe's fancythis little tranny seems lost, he cross-dresses with these dorksand jacks off to himself in jean shortsget tough and ball up your fists nowat least Rihanna had the balls to scrap and brawl with Chris Brown----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------enter me, rapping as JimShady----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------you can't sit at my table, i'm way too smart for you foolI draw hearts on my f-ckin' notebooks in art schoolit's way too f-cking hard to draw a cartoonI'd rather sing rap, yeah, I'll be a star soonI go on youtube and arguewith fedora and cardiganeating tofu at a barbecue----------------------------------------enter me, rapping as self again------------------------------------------It's complicated, you debated asking "who is he lord"just a kid who talks to ghosts from the past on a f-ckin ouija boardexposed dimensional doors in deadly vaultspentagram on the floor chalked, lined with heavy saltsdemon screaming sound so loud it shatters icestrapped to it, twicemedieval torture deviceon a f-cking rampage like a goddamn poltergeist------------------------------------------------------------------I'm rough and abrasive you should call me sand paperI jack off on the daily you can call me the hand raperI hit a cow with my car, and named him T-BoneI'm gettin' messy like cows destroying the ozonegettin' blown with beats on, call it head phonesI lied too much on my resume and now I authorize bank loansand here I stopped you just before you thought you got grown
Rap Battle, 22: Freestyle

Lil' Pump: Gucci Gang Instrumental My style hasn't changed a bit, but why would it need too? You on the other hand are sounding like a weeaboo In this rap battle it's me v you But it feels like I'm 'gainst nobody, too easy dude I'm cheesy yes, but what's that make you? It make you chicken, and bjtch, I'll BAKE you Calling the Brotherhood a fake crew, But all we do is keep this game true yo as for you, your rap group is even worse Only one member, you, put your group in a hearse Cause I don't wanna hear one word, one verse All you do is pull cheep insults out your purse And also maybe a little lipstick you f@ggot me, I'm the on who raps quick like an addict on crack, bjtch I'm ecstatic to see that you've happened to lapse quick I aint lying, I'm just spitting these facts quick yeah yeah Don't insult me personally, you don't wanna mess with me I'm not the one to be vexing, not the one to be tested cause the last bjtch who stepped to me, I X'd him You'll be leaving this world like Brit did Brexit
Rap Battle, 22: Freestyle

hit you with telekinesis so hard you cry tears of blood when you weepyou and I know that when we square off it's a clean sweepyou and your whole fleetyou all have been beatbecause none of you can compete with a true MClook, I'm not tryna sound cocky but I got bars stonger than rockyI rock your posseand met your mom at the bukkakeyou see your rhymes are shoddyand Masterful is just your proxythe Brother hood held together weak as epoxyyou're actin' snobbywhen I send you a copyof your auntie lookin' foxygettin' sloppyplayin' with my floppy diskand a poppy seed at reckless speed.yoyour style has changed noneand that's being real with youyou're so corny, it makes me lowkey wanna hit youbefore I go in too hard, go and grab a tissue,I'll give you till round 3 to prepare for my diss dudemake a footnote because this is a preludea new earth shattering record at unseen magnitudescan't afford star wars so you watch "galaxy feuds"you're like expired canned foodSo I'll sit at my house in Cancunand fondle your wife's boobsand catch you on the flipside, B
Rap Battle, 22: Freestyle

New Beat for round two, Hail Mary + instrumental by 2Pac The bells ringin', the angels start singin', the grim reaper you'll be seein', best believe it! cake seems frail with that Round 1 You okay my pal, you sound numb... After only a month or two, wow Seems like you've lost it all now Lay you to rest, throw dirt on your casket 'Cause on the mic your dead, so pass it Your rhymes are like cheap industrial plastic Mine are like spiritual, miracle magic Spittin classic, it's fantastic Becoming something of a muthafvckin habit So run rabbit, and go sing some country I wouldn't listen to your shjt even when I'm dumping Your rhyme clogs like shjt, it's clumping But take a look at my flow, aint it something? I got the crowds pumpin, you got them slumpin' Your stutter in your rap it's like your Forrest Gumpin' You might as well forfeit, turn in nothin' Or send in some shjt, even no one loves it But me they covet, yeah Final judgement will come one day my "friend" And to hell I hope you get sent Even if you repent, fast on Lent, God will not bend, he'll send you frying in the pen But until that day, we're judged on rap And judging your stuff, I'd say you're trapped! I got you beat, my win has ben mapped! Walk up to Jimmy, your @ss will get capped... One more thing, last night, you're mom's @ss I slapped. And all your dad could do was clap. *Edited for spelling and profane language*
Rap Battle, 22: Freestyle

Olympic gymnasts with UFC fists and Tour De France fitness can't blister the mister caker the bakers man by day and fister by night. You've got the slightest good rhymes but it's awful mighty for you to start fighting a champ. Again. So let's replay it back my friend I bring the end to your days of tending to atheist men, you've entered into the murderers den where you'll get slaughtered, but it doesn't bother me much when you act fatherless, you're not at the bottom of the barrel you're less, you call the suicide hotline and what they tell you is to make sure you don't make a mess, so more or less I'm coming fresh with ruthless rhymes I've told you a thousand times I stay improving while you worship God at a shrine and drink wine, you don't want fist to fist combat because your chin would be mine and reframe your jawline but I'll refrain from raining on you too hard, first round pains, it's been a while. Honestly man I haven't had a battle in a fat minute the last fagg-t who did it didn't have the originality to spit sh-t he avoided reality and recycled the bad lines a few times, but you don't, and I admire it but we both know I come with harder fire when I spit
Rap Battle, 22: Freestyle

Rap Battle, number twenty two coming up! Freestyle, gl gl! Start it right it up! instrumental JimShady, back on site DDO, looking for moe' Wins under my belt not enough Lookin for more stuff, more gruff, no bluff Won't be cuffed by you bjtches with wet chuffs I'm going hard on this shjt, I'm goin' rough Been a busy time for me, debating atheists Been taking a bunch of daily hits I don't know how long I can keep on taking this But I fight hard all day, and there aint no fakin' this Gaining up some good elo Debating BryanMullins, aint nothin' that he know That dumb@ss can be delusional, what a pee hole Now open this bjtch up with the key hole Stick in, lickin', pickin' and choosin', kicking and bruising That's what I'm doin', all day I'm just cruisin' Wanna debate me? See what happens You challenge me then I start laughin' I got the mind of Einstein, plus five, That's how I vibe, so subscribe, Proud member of the mothufvcking Brotherhood Destroying evil, and raising the good But this battle's over, the place you once stood... Will be wiped clean of your filth, hope you understood Bjtch yeah I knew you would! I knew you could! So show me what you got, I'll bomb you out Like North Korea, that's what I'm talkin 'bout! So get outta here ya clout I don't wanna shout, But I'm gonna have to do so, I have no doubt!!! (edits for spelling mistakes and vulgarity are allowed.)
Syrian Refuges should be allowed to enter the United States of America.

The United States of America (USA) has been known as a charitable country. In recent years the image of the country has been strongly scrutinized due to questionable leadership from the leading political parties. With an influx of refugees departing Syria into Europe, the USA is once again under scrutiny from the eyes of both those outside the country and on the inside. Even in the wake of the threat of the terrorist group known as ISIS, the leadership of the USA has made a decision on whether or not the country opens it's doors. Despite this call many still have there own opinions on whether or not the USA should or should not take in refugees due in a strong amount to the recent terrorist attacks in the capitol city of France, Paris. I will be arguing against the topic of allowing refugees to find refuge in the USA. The Country of Syria is in the middle of a Civil War and 9 million Syrians have fled their country since 2011. As per the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), 3 million plus have fled to neighboring countries. under 850,000 refugees have found asylum in the European Union. 85% are pledged for Germany. 62 percent of them are men. Judging by a UN spokesperson who stated "Those referred to the US would be among those remaining in the Middle East, such as Turkey and Jordan, and those refugees are largely women and children". This quote stats that it is mostly women and children that will be entering the USA, but the men have mostly been placed in Europe. The question that derives is can ISIL forces infiltrate the United States (US) refugee population as the one did in Paris. James R. Clapper believes so according to the Washington Times. He was the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) from 1992 to 1995. There have also been reports of other intelligence personnel who believe the same is possible. Michael McCaul, the Chairman of Homeland Security is one other who believes this. I will now leave this open for the opposition to respond. factcheck.org syrianrefugees.eu washingtontimes.com washingtonexaminer.com
Syrian Refuges should be allowed to enter the United States of America.

As the opposition has pointed out. "The Syrian refugee crisis has no immediate end in sight". A point that is extremely complicated to refute. This point stands out as the strongest to me of all other premises brought forward by the opposition. The opposition also goes on to state that " The financial and resource strain on the Middle East and on Europe is already quite large, and is expected to get bigger." This is once again a solid point made. I will not attack these points but I will branch off from them. In understanding that the civil unrest has no detectable end in the country of Syria, the refugee issue will continue. This adds to the latter premise about the fiscal strain that the countries of the European Union are experiencing. With the current fiscal issues the USA is experiencing, is it the wisest move to add more of a financial strain to the load by adding refugees? Not only speaking of the fiscal burdens, there are other issues to take into account. My opposition has gone deeper into the vetting process for ensuring that refugees are not a threat to our society. Though the US has one of the most extensive screening processes around, most of the Syrian records are not obtainable. There isn't much to vent the refugees on according to some top intelligence officials. Anyone can lie on a questionnaire and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to beat a polygraph. Extreme Islamic groups don't believe that the western way of life is correct. There have been reports that ISIS has admitted to infiltrating the refugee population. Some Islamic beliefs are based on pushing a mass killing of Islamic followers to encourage there apocalyptic beliefs. This is accomplished by forcing the West to retaliate to the actions of these terror attacks. as per Graeme Wood, March 2015, "An anti-Messiah, known in Muslim apocalyptic literature as Dajjal, will come from the Khorasan region of eastern Iran and kill a vast number of the caliphate"s fighters, until just 5,000 remain, cornered in Jerusalem. Just as Dajjal prepares to finish them off, Jesus"the second-most-revered prophet in Islam"will return to Earth, spear Dajjal, and lead the Muslims to victory." This is the type of rhetoric that is threatening to the life style of the USA. These refugees aren't expected to assimilate to the culture of the United States, but they are excepted to become citizens. This is destructive to the US way of life. The abrupt changing of a culture is a sure way to cause civil-unrest in our home country. There is another more affective way to assist Syrian refugees without threatening our home people. I will present this in the final round of the debate. [1] Graeme Wood, March 2015 [2] http://m.huffpost.com... [3] https://www.washingtonpost.com... [4] http://www.express.co.uk...
Resolved: Gay marriage should be legalized in the United States of America.

I will start my argument as I am pro and against the status quo, therefore holding the BoP. I shall start with some basics:Gay Marriage is not a legal term, therefore has no place in the debate. If the topic was "Gay marriage should be recognised by the Church" or similar, then the term has reference, but we are talking about law. Law takes precedence, and a Gay Marraige is, in the definition of law, a civil union.civil union - civil union (a voluntary union for life (or until divorce) of adult parties of the same sex) "parties to a civil union have all the same benefits, protections, and responsibilities under Vermont law as spouses in a marriage"(http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu...) Civil Marriage - civil marriage (a marriage performed by a government official rather than by a clergyman)Legalised - Of or concerning to the law.http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu... My argument is very simple. Firstly, a marriage requires a marriage licence to be legally recognised. This has to be picked up in any town or city clerk[1]. It can be done by any legally recognised statesman[2] and is not required to be done in a church, only done with witnesses[3]. Therefore, there is no religious argument that actually has any relevance to this issue. As long as the statesman consents, then there is no reason to ban marriage. And even in this case, I might add, the motive is irrelevant; if a person does not want to do something, you cannot force them to. This is indiscriminant. I cannot force someone to marriage a homosexual couple yet allow them not to marry a heterosexual couple, nor the other way around.Secondly, my opponent should reconcile my ignorance on this issue, but I thought that the point of living in a country with a seperation of church and state, a laicité government, meant that religion should not be able to impede decisions involved with the government, as well as the reverse. Therefore, surely it must logically follow, that the church cannot impede on issues involving the law? If so, then, unless events that occur independently of the church are dependent on the church (which makes little sense), then there is no requirement for religion to impede state decision.Thirdly, and finally, the fact of the matter is stopping gay marriage is homophobic discrimination at its core. There is little way of stopping this, I see. Homophobic people, that is, people prejudice against homosexual people[4], are those who atively prejudise, meaning "dislike, hostility, or unjust behaviour deriving from preconceived and unfounded opinions". So, my main aim is to show that my opponent's either dislike, hostility, or unjust behaviour derive from preconcieved or unfounded opinions. If my opponent is shown to be purely discriminatory, then I think that the debate has to be conceded. Unless, of course, we know accept disrcimination in our society.http://www.health.ny.gov...;IbidIbidhttp://wordnetweb.princeton.edu... http://oxforddictionaries.com...
Guns should be allowed

If people don't like guns, don't buy them! You have the right to own a firearm. Now, I will give you reasons that guns should be allowed. 1. Guns will help people in the fight against crime. Say a gang was shooting on your street, what do you do? You tell them to go away and leave them alone. Then pull out your gun and threaten them. They will scatter off. You just saved lives. It is not the guns that kill people, it is the people operating the guns. Regular people use guns for self defense. If guns were allowed in the city of Chicago (especially the South Side), I bet you crime would drop, because stupid gang members would be scared to enter the streets.
The chicken comes before the egg

In the rules for the debate, Con stated that definitional games were not allowed. I stated I would hold him to that, and it appears I will need to do so. First, Con argues genetics. It is important to note that he does not refute that according to the dictionary, the definition of an egg depends on parentage. This makes the argumentation irrelevant. The genetics of the situation isn't in dispute. The terminology is. According to con, "Since a chicken is a mutant Hybrid Junglefowl, and the egg is a mutant Hybrid Junglefowl egg, the egg is actually a chicken egg." This argument wins Con the point that the mutant-Hybrid-egg is the genetic equivalent of a chicken egg. However, the debate hinges on whether that egg should be described in relation to the Hybrid Junglefowl or the Chicken. If the egg in question should be described as a chicken egg that came from a Hybrid Junglefowl, the debate should go to Con. If the egg in question should be described as a Hybrid Junglefowl egg that grows into a chicken, the debate should go to Pro. Con did not dispute the fact that eggs are described in terms of the animal that produces them, instead choosing to argue that eggs are the genetic equivalent of the animal they grow into. This is true, but not a point under contention. Regardless of whether an egg will hatch and be considered a different species, regardless of whether it's genetically equivalent to a different species than the parent, the parent's species, by definition, determines how the egg is described and this was not disputed by Con. You must accept Pro's definition argument since Con passed his chance to challenge it. Thus, the egg of a Hybrid Junglefowl is still a Hybrid Junglefowl egg, even if it's genetically equivalent to a chicken. It was a dropped point that the descriptor is determined by parentage, not genetic makeup, thus the progression is still Hybrid Junglefowl -> Hybrid Junglefowl Egg -> Chicken -> Chicken Egg and the Chicken still comes before the chicken egg. To address Con's 2 arguments: the first is a perversion of the classic problem and should be dismissed under Con's own rules he stipulated in the OP. The second is simply a rehash of the above discussion, that the descriptor of an egg, whether it is a chicken egg or a hybrid junglefowl egg, is defined by parentage, not genetics. In summary: Con did not dispute that the definition of an egg depends on parentage not genetics, thus a chicken egg can only exist when a chicken has laid it, thus the chicken comes first. Con did not use in-line citations and so it is impossible to ascertain which of his links support which of his arguments. Please vote sources for Pro.
The chicken comes before the egg

I must contradict you in that. You seem to imply that the chicken would hatch from a Hybrid Junglefowl Egg. However technically, the egg from which the chicken is born is actually a chicken egg. Let me explain. Evolution is caused by random genetic mutations which happen to change the structure or function of sections of the organism. Now, in the egg from which the first animal we are willing to call a chicken, the genetic code for the chicken is already there. It is a mutant egg. Since a chicken is a mutant Hybrid Junglefowl, and the egg is a mutant Hybrid Junglefowl egg, the egg is actually a chicken egg. Now to my arguments: I believe that there are many ways of interpreting this quote. I will prove my point as CON for each of these interpretations. 1. Regarding meals. In typical diets, eggs are more commonly eaten at breakfast than chicken, and chicken is more commonly eaten at dinner than eggs. Since breakfast normally comes before dinner, the egg comes before the chicken. 2. Regarding the animal and it's origins. I have two views on this: -Evolution is caused by genetic mutations in the gametes or zygotes of an organism, which would be the unfertilized egg and the fertilized egg, respectively, when talking about chickens. Therefore, the first chicken's zygote/gamete, or egg, is already coded to be a chicken. So, it came first. -Some say the chicken has to lay the egg, but the chicken actually first comes from the egg, as I previously demonstrated. Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org... http://evolution.berkeley.edu... http://www.conservapedia.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org...
The chicken comes before the egg

Con has asked that we 'not get anal over definitions'. I agree and plan to hold Con to that, using only common dictionary provided definitions for the terms without trying to redefine terms or split hairs with definitions from odd sources. The classic formulation clearly implies the choice between a chicken or a chicken's egg. Eggs are defined by the animal they come from, not the animal they develop into [1]. A chicken's egg is an egg which comes from a chicken, therefore there must be a chicken to produce a chicken egg, therefore the chicken must come first. However, a chicken does not necessarily have to come from a chicken's egg. Whatever was the earliest ancestor of the chicken species that we are willing to call not-a-Chicken (possibly a hybrid of the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl [2]) at some point laid an egg with enough mutations that it grew into the animal we are willing to call a chicken. Thus the sequence goes Hybrid Junglefowl -> Hybrid Junglefowl Egg -> Chicken -> Chicken Egg. So we see that the chicken comes first. [1]http://www.merriam-webster.com... [2]http://www.plosgenetics.org...
Peyton Manning is not as good as why people say.

My opponent is missing my point with the defense argument. I am saying look at his team this year with out him. they suck, they are 0-13 and with him this year they would maybe be a 500 team the way there defense is playing. People talk about how manning made his recievers, well that isnt right at all, the man has amazing wide recievers who made him a good player, he is the poster child of the nfl which means they refs have to do what he says (you cant hit him).