The Fool will refute any argument for the existence of god.

I accept this challenge. If The Fool™ can refute my argument, he wins. Otherwise, I win. I'll lay out my argument very simply and defend it in the next round. Introduction I am defending the Christian God of the Holy Bible, whose attributes can be best summarized as [1]: There is but one only, living, and true God, who is infinite in being and perfection, a most pure spirit, invisible, without body, parts, or passions; immutable, immense, eternal, incomprehensible, almighty, most wise, most holy, most free, most absolute; working all things according to the counsel of His own immutable and most righteous will, for His own glory; most loving, gracious, merciful, long-suffering, abundant in goodness and truth, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin; the rewarder of them that diligently seek Him; and withal, most just, and terrible in His judgments, hating all sin, and who will by no means clear the guilty.God has all life, glory, goodness, blessedness, in and of Himself; and is alone in and unto Himself all-sufficient, not standing in need of any creatures which He has made, nor deriving any glory from them, but only manifesting His own glory in, by, unto, and upon them. He is the alone fountain of all being, of whom, through whom, and to whom are all things; and has most sovereign dominion over them, to do by them, for them, or upon them whatsoever Himself pleases. In His sight all things are open and manifest, His knowledge is infinite, infallible, and independent upon the creature, so as nothing is to Him contingent, or uncertain. He is most holy in all His counsels, in all His works, and in all His commands. To Him is due from angels and men, and every other creature, whatsoever worship, service, or obedience He is pleased to require of them.In the unity of the Godhead there be three Persons of one substance, power, and eternity: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost. The Father is of none, neither begotten nor proceeding; the Son is eternally begotten of the Father; the Holy Ghost eternally proceeding from the Father and the Son. Argument This is a logical argument. Pro must use logical laws to refute a logical argument. In order for the refutation to be objectively true, logical laws must be abstract, invariant, and universal. Abstract entities are products of thought. Products of thought necessitate a mind. In order for a mind to produce invariant and universal entitites, it must also be invariant and universal. In order for a mind to be invariant and universal, it must be immaterial. If there is no God, then there is no immaterial, invariant and universal mind. If there is no immaterial, invariant and universal mind, then there are no abstract, invariant, and universal logical laws. If there are no abstract, invariant, and universal logical laws, then there is no objectively true refutation to this logical argument. Therefore, to objectively refute this argument, God must exist. Conclusion The Fool™ can only refute my argument if it is non-refutable. Ergo, will not be able to refute it.Each premise in my argument follows from the one before. Thus, The Fool™ does not need to refute every premise since refuting one premise implicitely defeats the ones the follow. However, if I can defend all contended premises then The Fool™ has lost this debate. Sources http://www.reformed.org...