Covenys recent behavior would be a net detriment on ForDebating.Com (his new website)

We can dismiss most everything in his last round as 90 percent of it is incoherent rambling that literally misrepresents or has nothing to do with the topic at all. Also, Tuf is not a moderator in any capacity, so that whole spiel is also non-topical. I'm going to offer arguments during this round and rebuttals to his previous round during my next round. A starting point to remember. TUFS behavior or anyone's behavior who has engaged with Coveny is a non-factor in this debate. We are discussing whether his behavior (including his responses) will be a net detriment to his site or any site that he could act as a figurehead on. 1) The Role of a Figure Head and how you can damage a brandAny time you put yourself in any public position where you act as a figurehead for anything, there are certain standards of behavior that should be adopted. This is true if you are a manager in a store, if you are the president of the united states, or if you are a moderator or owner of almost any site. The reason this is the case is that you represent whatever you are serving. You can represent a job, our country, or even a site. When people join a site a figurehead is one of the primary things they look at. They are essentially a role model for the community and represent them in a huge capacity. This is especially true as an owner of a site. This means you have to behave by certain standards. If you are a manager and spew racial slurs or ad hominems you will probably be fired. If you are a moderator and act negatively toward the community, chances are you will be removed. If you manage or oversee anything and act negatively and irresponsibly toward a customer, you will probably be fired. Because as I said, you represent what you server. Coveny's Recent Behavior is in direct contrast to how someone should operate as a figurehead. In his case as an owner or moderator of his new website. His behavior will be viewed poorly and will directly impact how people see his site or even him as a person. He has referred to members as diks [1] liars [2] and generally classified a specific member as a horrible horrible person [1][2]. This is even after that member apologized[3][4] for his behavior in a mafia game (he baited and lied to win, go figure it's normal behavior but Coveny does not think so). He has referred to other members as shtty human beings, liars, being stupid and unintelligent [5][6]. His behavior as a future figurehead and owner is damaging to the brand he is trying to sell and will hurt his site more than help it. You have to sell a brand, and as a figurehead of a brand your attitude and responses are directly correlated to how people view your brand. With his behavior, new members will not like his site. Ironically he uses Trump and Alex Jones as examples and makes an argument that any publicity (even bad) is good publicity type of argument. This is his only argument in his entire round and it's bad. It's why Trump is the most hated president in US history and Alex Jones is considered a nutjob. Imagine if you were shopping and talked to a manager about something. If that manager called you a horrible person, liar or dik, then you would never shop there again. He treats people horribly. This can be verified by his attitude. Tuf, myself, and many others even considered his site as a viable option at one point. Until he started his rambling and negative attitude. Now it's not even in our minds. Read his posts and ask yourself can this guy moderate effectively. His behavior is an argument by itselfIt explains itself[1] http://www.debate.org...[2] http://www.debate.org...[3] http://www.debate.org...[4] http://www.debate.org...[5] http://www.debate.org...[6] Everything related to the thread from source 5 verifies way more of this