BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
PS3 vs Xbox360

- Graphics-ANY and what I really mean is ALL cross platform games ( 360 and ps3 ) look better, run better ( less "lag" and jutter ) and have far less loading times on the 360 than the ps3. Its a fact an Sony fanboys just gotta get use to it. But Uncharted 2 is an example of nearly the full system power of the ps3 ( said they used around 90-95% ) and damn it looks SEXY.... 2- Xbox Live ( though not free ) is FAR better than PSN... everyone knows it, read any comparison ( done by professionals not just kids or fanboys on the internet ) they all say that XBL is superior. Think about it... there's over easily over 100k if not way more people on xbl than psn... You get what you pay for. It has netflix ... the ps3 does now too but you need to put in a cd to play it.. 360 just stream it even up to 1080p, 360 and xbox games for download, DLC comes first ( usually ) and sometimes its exclusive, now has Last FM radio, facebook, twitter. And do you wanna be able to easily talk to friends ( more than 1 anyway lol ) NO MATTER what your doing? 3-The whole xbox breaking thing is over with now... just how the ps3 is no longer gonna cost you an extra mortgage on your house to by it... This is recent stats of console breakage. Wii-9% 360-15% Ps3-16% ... so there tied right now If you think I'm lying about the graphics Google 360 vs ps3 graphic comparison... I bet you cant find 1 game that looks or runs better on the ps3...except oblivion, looks better but doesn't run better. 360 has media connect to pc too ... I doubt many people use it but I do... Its easier to have music, pics, and videos coming from my pc. It doesn't take up space on my 360 and is easy to organize and move things in or out. You do have to download EVERY game to the ps3 which can take a few long *** minutes... its so they can play the games at a decent speed of about the 360's. You can do this on the 360 which just halves the loading times compared to the ps3... Ok because I love hearing fan boys complain, I'm going to say this and prove this to EVERYONE! First off, the ps3 is technically more powerful of a SYSTEM then the 360. Its faster too, BUT as a GAMING CONSOLE it falls behind. The ps3 has the potential to have more stuff on the screen at once. The 360 can produce BETTER graphics than the PS3. Its a fact get use to it. The ps3 is so complicated to develop ( for games ) that even games like Uncharted 2 were using over 90% of the systems power. Its a great game, and very good looking. I was impressed by everything, BUT the 360 can do better, graphically speaking. The 360 also can process more information faster and more efficient, meaning games ( when used right which is 90% of the time ) will be "slower", have less of a frame rate then the 360. Google 360 vs ps3 graphic comparison. In EVERY game ( except 2 that tied.. tennis and marvel... lol like it matters ) the 360 wins on every game. This is because its easier to make for it, then more complicated to convert over, thus messing up the game ( even if its just slightly ). plus the 360 controllers just feel better in my opinion.
Christianity vs Islam

Thank you Aicha. I will respond and then conclude. My opponent says that John 14:6 saying that Jesus is only the medium to come to God. The problem here is that Allah is the truth is the truth in Surah 22:6-7. I cited this as Jesus saying that he is applying to himself the attributes of Allah. The conclusion is the gospel. God came down as Jesus Christ in the flesh to take upon himself the sins of the whole world. He was crucified was buried and he rose again the third day according the scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 and Philippians 2:5-11) If you want to know the hope that is only found in Christ, please go to http://blazeofhope.weebly.com... If you want to contact me please go to http://blazeofhope.weebly.com.... If you want to debate me, please go to http://blazeofhope.weebly.com... you want me to be a guest speaker, please go to http://blazeofhope.weebly.com... God bless!
Christianity vs Islam

Thank you, -In response to whether Jesus was made to be coequal with the father or was he eternally coequal with the father? In my opinion what's the point of having Jesus if he can do the exact same things as the father? -And in response to where Jesus did say that he is only a prophet in those exact words? "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6 This simply means that he's a medium that you should seek whenever you want to repel to god, but he shouldn't be worshiped.
Christianity vs Islam

Thank you Aicha. I have already responded to this in my first rebuttal. I have not seen a response to most of my arguments or my responses I am still disappointed. I know what the Qur'an says in regards to the subject of the deity of Christ. This debate is about what data we have from the Bible and the Qur'an on this subject. I believe that I have made a good case from both in my first response. I would like to see my opponent interact with some of these before the end of the debate.
Christianity vs Islam

Thank you, Yet I'm still concerned with the deity of Jesus, since you believe that he got the complete authority from god it doesn't mean that he is "god" and doesn't mean that he should be worshiped. 1st of all because Jesus never said that he is god yet never said worship me and second of all there is only one god to worshiped and he is Allah the creator of everything including Jesus. -Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;.He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like unto Him. (112) -And yet some people assert, "God has taken unto Himself a son!" Limitless is He in His glory! [96] Nay, but His is all that is in the heavens and on earth; all things devoutly obey His will. - 2:116
Christianity vs Islam

Thank you Aicha. Again John 5:19 says that Jesus could do everything that the father could do. If he could do everything that the father could do then obviously he is coequal with the father. Was Jesus made to be coequal with the father or was he eternally coequal with the father? I also commend Aicha for accurately representing the trinity. I have not seen this very much in all my encounters with Muslims, so thank you. I agree that there is much controversy over this subject. I will assert that the trinity is the doctrine that is most consistent with the Bible. I will make my case for the trinity if my opponent wants. I must say that I am disappointed with the rest of the rebuttal. He did not rebut any of the scripture that I used. He has a chance to get to the verses I shared in the rest of his rebuttals. He quoted Matthew 7:21-23 saying that he condemns people who were preached and taught in his scripture. This interpretation does not fit in harmony with the book of Acts as a whole or John 14:14. A better interpretation would be that Jesus was talking about the people who use his name for self gain (as many preachers today do) or preach his name hypocritically. He says the the worship of Christ as deity is shirk (associating partners with Allah) this is the unforgivable sin in Islam. Some Muslims like Dr. Shabir Ally disagree. But I believe that my opponent's statement sets the theme for the why this debate is important to Muslims and Christians.
Christianity vs Islam

Thank you, In response to your question "Why would God give authority to do everything he could do to a created being?" God didn't give Jesus the complete authority yet he gave him some signs to show people that Jesus is a prophet and not a normal human being. 1- Christianity has digressed from the concept of the Oneness of God, however, into a vague and mysterious doctrine that was formulated during the fourth century. This doctrine, which continues to be a source of controversy both within and outside the Christian religion, is known as the Doctrine of the Trinity. Simply put, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity states that God is the union of three divine persons " the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit " in one divine being. If that concept, put in basic terms, sounds confusing, the flowery language in the actual text of the doctrine lends even more mystery to the matter: "...we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity... for there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, another of the Holy Ghost is all one... they are not three gods, but one God... the whole three persons are co-eternal and co-equal... he therefore that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity..." (excerpts from the Athanasian Creed) 2- The Jesus of the Bible rejects those that preached and taught in his name. He casts them aside and disassociates himself from them because their work was evil and they were evil. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. Matthew 7:21-23. This rejection is for the Trinitarian who ascribes Jesus as a partner to God, because there is nothing more evil and disgusting than ascribing a partner to God.
Christianity vs Islam

Thank you Aicha. I will answer these objections. 1 The answer to that question is yes. But on a serious point, can you show me where in the gospels was Jesus was created? When I read the Bible, I read something completely different. (John 1:1, John 8:56-58 and John 17:5) Also I this is a misunderstanding of the trinity called modalism we don't say that Jesus is the father. We believe that Jesus and the father along with the holy spirit are equally God coequal and coeternal. 2 "Jesus never said 'I am God'. While it is true that Jesus never said those exact words, I believe that Jesus teaches his divinity all throughout the Gospels both synoptic, and John. At Jesus's trial, he was asked, "Art thou the Christ the Son of the blessed?" He answered saying, "I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven." (Mark 14:61-62). You may be thinking that the fact he called himself the son of man that it proves he is not divine. My response to this is that he quoted Daniel 7:13-14, "I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed." Jesus described himself as I AM (cross reference with Exodus 3:14) in the following list. "I am the bread of Life (John 6:35,48,51) "I am Light of World (John 8:12; 9:39) "I am the door of the sheep (John 10:7,9) "I am the good shepherd (John 10:11,14) "I am the Resurrection and the life (John 11:25-26) "I am the Way the Truth and the Life (John 14:6) "I am the True Vine (John 15:1,5) "Before Abraham was I am (John 8:58) "Unless you believe that I am you will die in your sins (John 8:24) Jesus described himself as having power on earth to forgive sins (Matthew 9:6, Mark 2:10 and Luke 5:24). He also accepted worship as deity from Thomas when he saw that he was risen (John 20:28-29). Jesus claims things that according to the Qur'an can only apply to Allah (compare John 5:25 and John 14:6 to Surah 22:6-7) If Jesus was saying that he was only a prophet of God, then he must be the worst communicator in all of history. Also in response to this could you tell me where Jesus said that he is only a prophet in those exact words? 3 I have a question in John 5:19 we see that Jesus could do what the father could do. In Isaiah 42:8. In the light of this, why would God give authority to do everything he could do to a created being? I will now give my opponent an opportunity to respond.
Christianity vs Islam

In the name of Allah the most merciful and the most graceful and peace be upon the last messenger of God Mohammed. Mainly I have concerns regarding the deity of the Christ Jesus, and I'll state my points about this topic: 1-Will you worship Jesus, or the one Jesus worshiped? Mainly because we shall worship the creator and not the creation, and Jesus is the creation of God and not the creator of us and everything else. 2- Jesus never said I am God. Here are the passages from the OT where God says he is God: Gen 35:11 And God said unto him, I [am] God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins. 3-Jesus was given power and authority, he did not own it. And the powers given to him are by God all mighty and yet god has the ability to take them back. Which means there is an owner of a higher power that should be praised for the ability to give Jesus these powers and not Jesus himself.
Coin battle (gamble)

This will be a coin battle, I'll explain the concept of the game. (Note: this is new for me as it's an innovation)Concept:1) I, pro will select heads or tails from a coin (quarter pref)2) Then con will get the opposite end of what I pick.3) After both pro and con have received their side of the coin, then both pro and con will have to entrust the voters4) the voters will need one coin and voters will flip the coin and whatever the result of the coin is for ex. if pro selected heads and the voters flipped the coin and got heads, then pro wins and vice-versa.My resolution: Tails.Goodluck to con and goodluck to all and have fun!¨Gambling is like life, you don't know when you're gonna die, but you still live on¨ - Man of wisdom Alt+M Alt+N
Athenian Democracy

But like i said the court may rule you out of being a citizen. The person has to be born with both parents being citizen. So this means that it can easily exclude him from being citizen.! The total population is 240,235. what if The women don't like what the men are voting on.? they cant really do anything about it because they have no power.! How can you call this a democracy with the exiling and all that.? Its basically like having one ruler which is the men.! Also a democracy is not all about voting.! This is not a democracy whatsoever.!
Athenian Democracy

That's true but the voter has be freeborn. Also if the court decides that he has no right to be a citizen, he sold by the Athens as a Slave. Not everyone can be a voter, very little actually. The court can decide this. What if one of the members does not like you.? They can easily vote you out. Also the people can Exile you if they think you are doing your own thing. So you cant even express what you feel toward the democracy because you will get exiled?
Athenian Democracy

yes, but only 12% of the population got to vote for the things. And the total population was 240,235. That's not even half. Only those 12% got to vote for the things that all the people got to use. That's really not far. Women did not get to vote, slaves, kids, and practically no males, unless they had military training and if the parents were citizens. I mean who calls this a democracy?!
Censorship should be eliminated from all forms of entertainment

I'm supposed to be anti-censorship. That's what it says, but seeing as you chose anti-censorship, I will be pro. Ever wondered the reason behind racial discrimination, sexual discrimination, children committing crime or violence? The main reason is that censorship is not properly imposed or there is a need of censorship in the society. Censorship is the suppression of ideas and information that certain people, individual, groups or government officials find it objectionable, offensive or dangerous on others. There are varieties of other definitions but all have in common the concept of withholding information and/or resources from those who seek it. Hence censorship is essential in society to eliminate discrimination on basis of race and sex, protect children, maintain stability and restore what censor sees as lost moral values. Censorship occurs when expressive materials like books, magazines, movies, videos, music or work of art are restricted to particular audiences based on their age or other characteristics.
Censorship should be eliminated from all forms of entertainment

I would enjoy to discuss this topic and hope someone accepts Anyway... Censorship in the United States whether it be movies, music, t.v. and so on is an infringement on First Amendment rights and should be deemed unconstitutional. We have been raised in a society where it is viewed as wrong to say what we want be it bad language, our opinion about our government, etc. All I'm saying is if its right for the KKK to voice there opinion's at any time I think we should be able to say anything anywhere at anytime.
If god was real he would've created immortal beings

As I observed last round, God would not necessarily want to "be close to his children", "end all suffering", or have everyone believe in a single "undeniable truth". The perfect, divine utopia Pro has described actually sounds quite boring: a reality which would eventually become mundane and uninteresting to both its ruler and its inhabitants. Why should we believe that this is what God wants? Why should Pro get to dictate what constitutes a "better" plan? Attempting to determine what is "in the interests of God" is futile, because we have no possible way of knowing what God's goals or desires are. God does not have to conform to Pro's conceptions of what an all-powerful being should be like, which is why Pro's argument is fatally flawed.
If god was real he would've created immortal beings

In Scenario A God creates Adam and Eve and the heavens universe and all that is within it as the bible suggests. In Scenario B God decides to take a simpler more effective route. 1) He creates a world of Immortal and holy god like creatures that mimic his holiness. 2) These immortal beings are pure and sin free and thus can communicate with the lord as suggested in Genesis. 3) There would be no suffering in a world full of sinless, immortal beings and no unnecessary death or cruelty. 4) All beings would know God and thus be eternally grateful to God for creating them putting to rest any dispute about the existence of God. 5) God would be pleased with the purity of his creation and how much they love respect and praise him thus strengthening the relationship with god. Scenario A is clearly a better scenario not just in the interests of God wishing to be close to his children and the desire for the purity of his children. This would also end all suffering and would ensure everyone has the same knowledge about God ultimately unifying everyone around the world around this undeniable truth. Scenario B Lacks any clear purpose of God or at least doesn't define the purposes of god by Bible definitions. If God truly exists Scenario A would have been reasonably within his powers and reasonably sufficient for his intentions with his creation here on earth and would ultimately be a better plan all round.
If god was real he would've created immortal beings

Pro makes the absolute claim that if God existed, he would definitely have made his creations immortal. This is completely baseless and has no evidence whatsoever. The mere possession of power does not mandate its full use. In other words, just because an omnipotent God would have the power to create immortal beings does not mean that he would use that power to actually do so. Pro claims that it would be in his "favor to do so" and that it would "end the God debate for good", but he never explains why this is the case. And even if either of those assertions were true, it would still not prove Pro's absolute claim to be true, because God doesn't necessarily have to do everything that is "in his favor", nor would he necessarily be interested in "ending the God debate". I will wait for Pro to actually try supporting his claim in the next round.
If god was real he would've created immortal beings

I'm not sure why Pro is asking me what I would do if I were God, because I'm not God, and I don't know what God wants any better than he does. Pro's last round is nothing but emotional appeals centered around the faulty assumption that what he deems to be the "best choice" is necessarily what God would deem to be the "best choice". Pro's standard of what constitutes "good" and "better" is completely baseless. There is no rule written in the sky that God would have to conform to that standard in making his judgments. As mortals with limited knowledge, we have no way of fathoming what an all-powerful, all-knowing being would do. Pro's case is fundamentally flawed in that it attempts to ascertain what God would do without any knowledge of what God's personality or goals are; instead, he fallaciously assumes that God would share his subjective values and builds his entire case off of that. The resolution has not been affirmed.
If god was real he would've created immortal beings

Would you like your beloved children to earn heaven with the possible of eternal damnation? If you created heaven and hell why would it even be a question as to where your child would go. You're correct in that I never specified which "God" we are referring to but it was implied by myself and mostly everyone else that we are talking about the character of the god of the bible. Knowing the definitions used to define god by mostly everyone. (All Knowing, Omnipotent, All Powerful, Pure. Holy,) I can assume that my alternative scenario is infinitely better in every aspect in relation to the commonly described character of God. I don't see how testing the motives of his creation and allowing them to carry through life with unverified knowledge in hopes that they make the right decision is the best option for anyone. No parent would be fine with not giving their child the necessary tools to go out into the world on their own in hopes that they will ultimately make the right decision. It doesn't sound at all beneficial to anyone especially considering that the trials and tribulations of this world as well as most of the decisions we make on earth are irrelevant once in heaven. There will be nothing but purity in heaven and no free will that doesn't align with God. I don't see how earning heaven by struggling on earth and then living a boring monotonous eternity solves anything for anyone, why not skip the heartache and make life happy for everyone like any good person would. I may never be able to affirm the motives of God but I can definitely think of many other ways someone who holds the description of a Benevolent, all powerful, all knowing, Father God would handle his creation. Even after causing a flood and having a second chance to reform the world and create a better existence for humanity that would also be pleasing in his sight. It's irrational to think that this is the best he can do considering his immense power and benevolence.
If god was real he would've created immortal beings

Again, Pro misses the point. Perhaps God wants his beloved children to have to earn heaven. Perhaps God and his angels watch people struggle on the dystopia known as Earth as some sort of reality TV show. Perhaps heaven doesn't even exist. The resolution of the debate does not specify that "God" has to be as he is portrayed in Abrahamic religions. The crux of my argument is that if an all-knowing and all-powerful being such as God exists, we have no way of knowing God's goals, and so it is impossible for us to make absolute claims about what he "would have done". Pro's claim is literally impossible to affirm.
If god was real he would've created immortal beings

I would like you to tell me how my scenario is any different than what heaven will be? That scenario is exactly like what heaven will be why didn't he start us out that way? there is not one negative aspect of that scenario. If the character of god is as described in the bible, I can think of a couple of other ways he could have gone about doing things to have a better outcome. Noah's ark supports that he clearly was not happy with the outcome of his creation at one point.