Rio Olympics 2016 Should be Cancelled

Thank you for your argument, Con.HealthIf you know anything about wording and reliable sources, your source does not back up your statements on health.1. It's well known that when a virus leaves your system, it rarely comes back. That's not specific to Zika, that's all viruses. I also said that the only way Zika can be non-fatally removed from your system is with a vaccine which is predicted to be a lengthy process.2. Your Rompers source is the internet equivalent of a tabloid. Neither Rompers or it's link to CNN and Gupta's analysts confirms the life expectancy of Zika in your body [1]. It remains dormant after 7 days, it doesn't die. The links to back up their statements also stops at CNN and has no back-up afterwards whatsoever. Zika's symptoms goes down after 7 days, but the microcephaly does not [2]. My Norwegian woman example is not fallacious, by the way, one of my sources listed speaks of the later time that Zika still affects the woman later. The free condoms suggestion is good, although, the main transmission form of Zika is through mosquitoes [3] and no repellent is ever guaranteed.As for the rest of the repellent and clothing suggestions, the facts have been established and it would depend on hypothesis to further the argument and this section of the debate would become subjective. My graph is 4 months outdated, not 3 years (like your economics argument). I would tone down on the adjective of 'severe'. 3 months wouldn't render my argument useless, because the graph still proves the number of people in Brazil that have Zika from the exponential rise Zika experienced. Crime In Ireland, there is no where near as much crime as the unfounded number you are providing without sources. In fact, source number four explains much otherwise [4]. Your number of 60% is also not based on any other denominator. Do you mean that 60% of people in Ireland commited violent crime, are victims of violent crime, witnessed violent crime? Rio de Janeiro on the other hand is an exceptionally violent city for any city in the world [5]. The reason other cities have higher crimes rate in the north is because the police aren't moderating them as much as they're supposed to. Rio is a metropolis, a significant amount of security would be dedicated to protecting them but are not doing a good job. You also did not partake in reading some of my articles on crime as one of them has a clear example of how bad crime is in Rio. Assuming you still won't read, let me quote. "Just days ago, armed men attacked Rio’s largest public hospital, successfully freeing a drug kingpin. " [6]. As I mentioned in the previous round, with sources, if Brazil continues wasting money on the non profiting Olympics, they will lose more money if they continue progressing than instead of cancelling the Olympics as a whole [7]. Otherwise, combating crime with your unfounded profit hypothesis is still only an assumption while the absence of profit regardless of the Olympics continuing or not is guaranteed.Economics You don't need to apologize for the source and also 3 months does not equal 3 years (so we're not even). My stimulus comment was a statement of me agreeing with you. If you called it a narrow view, your calling your own economics argument a narrow view. I didn't ignore your argument, I disproved it with the chronological factor that rendered it useless. You, on the other hand, did not listen to the reasoning or source that backed my argument with the ticket sales and absence of profit guarantee [also 7]. CultureA developing country like Brazil also doesn't have the ability to manage the Olympics successfully when they're dealing with 3 major crises and a guarantee of a loss of profit [ also 7]. ConclusionI never said or mentioned it to be feasible to cancel the Olympics at this time. Although it's definitely easier to cope with refunding the people then being labeled an international fiasco for having unfinished stadiums (which they don't have the time to finish anyways) [8], exponential crime and an economic downfall. As for the recession, since there will be no profit, there needs to be a preservation of any cent in order to combat the recession. -Sources-[1] http://www.cnn.com...[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com...[3] https://en.wikipedia.org...[4] http://www.nationmaster.com...[5] http://www.numbeo.com...[6] http://www.nytimes.com...[7] http://fortune.com...[8] http://www.mirror.co.uk...