BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Abortion should be illegal!!

Gaah. Why would she go through all that..when she can that it to a foster care?? Wouldn't you feel good if you made a family happy? You tell me. Maybe that baby that she aborted had the idea of the cure for cancer. Maybe he coud've been the president that had it all. Ever thought about that? Kids are the future. We need more engineers. We need more doctors, M.D'S, Dentists, Scientist, Archiologist...etc You just never know who a kid is gonna be, Cure for AID'S? Cure for H.I.V? The biggest question..Cure for cancer? In this century kids are getting very smart by the age of 3. The can understand and talk a full conversation like an adult. When there 6..Who knows what they thinking..We need them no more than ever. Dont you think?
Abortion should be illegal!!

It'll never go on a bad record because it's not against the law in some states. Also, she doesn't have to harm her self in any way. They do have abortion clinics which makes it safe and clean for an abortion and it can remain anomynous. Also the thing about having sex and wearing a condom, sometimes, but rarely the males shlong is too gigantic, the condom tears, or pops (I'll show you when i meet you on what i mean by this. lol). Then they are left with pregnancy. And just because they have sex, doesn't mean you can say, "Well they can do it then they should be responsible enough to have a baby." That'll then make the wearing of condoms null-n-void. Because then that'll mean sex should only be done if you want a baby. Sex is very healthy and satisfying. It also releases endorfins which can make you feel good and can even fight off any illnesses. Ill show you how this works, instead of talking any furhter on it. *BONG!!!!!!!
Abortion should be illegal!!

You put it on the comment box r-tard. Why does everbody think rape victims when the hear the word abortion. i just dont understand that a woman would go a long way to harm herself with the drinking of clorox or bleach to punching herself and maing herslef fall down the stairs to kill a baby and hurting herself also. and when she thinks about it, i wouldn't be in this situation if her partner didn't wear a condom with those 15 minutes of satisfaction.. if she does indeed abort her baby she's gonna have a bad record for the rest of her life and when indeed she decides to have a baby, social services are gonna be contacting her twice a month until the baby is 18. Herassment? No. Because of that one mistake that one guilt she decided to do. So you are in favor of self-harm? or people to harm themselfs for a long time just to give up something that's a part of them..a part of their soul?
Abortion should be illegal!!

Whoops, i F*cked up G. Ignorith the commint. :) Your endeing statement in round 2 can't be used. Sorry gurl but ya just can't use that statement in a debate, because then i can turn and say that i think it can be legal, that's why it should be period. But as I've said before, if the special victims unit can't prove that the grandfather was the rapist then it will most likly to go to the grand-dads custody, even though they ask for a perternity test, he can easily say it's against his religion and without having to prove it, they cannot give him the test. And it shouldn't be a guilty consience if the child weren't alive to begin with. Even though i stated that, doesn't mean thy're not going to feel guilty. and if they considered suicide, it shows them to be weak minded. you also stated that the baby would see it's mother in heaven? Well the baby hasn't even been alive and yet seeks out a vengence against his mother, i find this highly un-likely. This would go into the debate, if God exists, or if fetuses have souls. Most rape victims never go to the police simply because they have fear of the raper. I know it sounds wack, but more than 70% of all rape victims never go to the authorities.
Abortion should be illegal!!

I understand..May girls get raped by the fathers I bet. But if they have the chance to go through labor and so on and so forth. The hospital, in a heart beat contacts social services, and social services gives her options. They can easily re-areange something for the victim. She can put the baby in foster care if there's no one that can take care of the baby with a STABLE environment. Of course social services is not going to hand the baby to one of the girls uncles thats a crack dealer or crack head, pipes laying everywhere on the floor, powder substance on the coffee table..That's a big no no. Like I said before. I don't think anyone would want to live with the guilt of killing something thats of part of them. In my eyes. I would love to make a family happy with a child that they always wanted to care. Babies is what keeps this world growing day by day. Rapist are another rebate..Should they be put to death row? Or just give them time? Special Victims Unit has a job..To keep them pervs off the streets and not let them rape again. Rape victims should have only two choices..Keep the baby for herself or make a family happy. I belive if they live with the guilt of murder that it will eventually lead to depression and maybe suicide. So not only she killed her son or daughter..she killed herself..and she's gonna be poop outta luck when those portals open for her and her son or daughter would be waiting for her on the other side with questions...Okay that was dumb..but i have a point. Abortion should be illegal. period.
Abortion should be illegal!!

I think maybe Adrians right on this one... Thanx Ok you made a great statement... Aborting would be killing the child before it began to live. But here's a question. If the woman were to be raped by her father at lets say the age of 16. Then because she couldn't abort, she's out in the situation in which she must have this child and not ready for it in the long term. She hasn't had a job and yet she's being forced to care for this new child with no finances. Yes she may abort it, but there's always that one chance that her grandparent, (her dad) can file to adopt the child. If there's no proof, he can and will gain custody of the child. Now you put your child in a much worse environment than you might have thought. And these cases happen all the time. It wouldn't be fair. Also, if the child is unborn, it's not murder nor is it cruel. for the simple fact that it isn't even alive yet. You cannot kill something that doesn't have a life.
organ donation should automatically be everybody's fate unless they opt out

over the course of time, the medical advances has brought with it new changes, especially in organ donation. the following idea of organ donation is not considering as the best option. Firstly, it must be recognized that organ donation is risky due to not all people have a great health. Here, is the theory, if you harm one organ, then your other organs will be in danger, too. For example, some people ,who get drunk and harm their liver as well as their kidney, may not be the best suit for acceptors. therefore, individuals should be careful about themselves in the name of their safety. secondly, it is really hard to transplant one organ to another. for example, kidney transplantation is one of the most complicated surgeons that needs both a great effort and money. thus, not all doctors give agreements for the reason that they require a vast amount of money. Thirdly, if each individual had donated their organs before their death, the population would increase incrementally.
In the United States, a mixed economy is the most logical form of economics available.

So you mean to say that in the market, you will get a profit on clothes more than water? Are you trying to say the revenue on water will be lesser than guns? Are yo trying to say that when you go to a market and you have 3 bucks. From that you can either take a bottle of water or buy some stuff from a flea market and you will go to the flee market? The customer always takes what /she needs most and will automatically make sure that needs come fist. Of course there's more profits in the needs! So what is this about profit triumphing over human needs? Then anyways, police and firefighters not just become a part of the economy out of the blue. A school is not a market, i is a learning centre; nd only the teachers of government schools are paid by the govt.
In the United States, a mixed economy is the most logical form of economics available.

Please don't patronize me by calling me "lil kid". On this site there is an expected level of conduct so please quit it. "Socialism takes away competition and the need to improve products while capitalism operates purely to produce a profit without regard for human needs. " When I said this I did not mean that a market economy never provides what people need because I admire that aspect of capitalism, the invisible hand and the principle of supply and demand. "The market provides us with what we want, the government is there for maintaining law and order." You say the market provides what people need as if that is the objective of capitalism. Remember, supplying the needs of the peoople is a tenet of socialism. In a market economy, profit always trumps human needs. Like what I said about a healthcare monopoly. Exploiting patients to make a larger profit goes along with unrestricted capitalism but we must incorporate certain aspects of socialism like a degree of regulation so that exploitation is kept to a minimum. All is most certainly not well in a market economy. It is a socialist principle that the police, firefighters, and teachers are paid by the government. Although, granted, it is not used in only pure socialist economies. Under full capitalism everything is privatized and the police simply become mercenaries. This is how schools and fire stations used to be and it led to huge instances of discrimination by the firefighters on who they wished to service. The government is to make sure that things like exploitation and discrimination are kept t a minimum. That is not to say that governments are always good but when working in a truly democratic way, economy included, exploitation and discrimination can be kept down.
In the United States, a mixed economy is the most logical form of economics available.

Well, li'l kid, if you didn't read my arguments properly you won't understand my point. Anyways, to repeat what I said:In a market economy the government still takes care of necessary products and law a order. On top of that, the profits are higher because the market produces goods that we, the people want and need and the government does not interfere in whatever is produced. Now talking about necessities... Do you think any market will survive if it does not sell the simple basic abundant need; water?; or maybe food? The market provides us with what we want, the government is there for maintaining law and order. All's well in a market economy.
In the United States, a mixed economy is the most logical form of economics available.

Well it doesn't matter that you didn't mean offense because your unimaginative speculation on where I learned about economics is actually pretty offensive. Are you actually going to post an argument or are you just going to speculate on how I came about my knowledge. Cause I certainly did not post a debate where someone just calls me out and tries to give me life lessons. Please just post your arguments so we can get on with this debate already. You have already wasted a round.
In the United States, a mixed economy is the most logical form of economics available.

No offense meant, socialpinko, but it looks like you have just heard about these words economy, socialism etc. for the first time in your life at high school and have started off about mixed economies. Well then, it becomes my duty to inform you that life is not simple copy-paste but more of practicality. In a market economy, (when talking about practicality), the government still takes care of necessary products and law a order. On top of that, the profits are higher because the market produces goods that we, the people want and need and the government does not interfere. Isn't that just too ood for an country, especially one like the US after the Global Economic Crisis in 2008?
legalize marajuana

Being stoned and driving makes you a more capable driver I'm failing to see how a substance which limits your attention capacity doesn't effect your driving for the negative.It boosts your senses and reflexes. Perhaps it makes you hungry, but it does not enhance your senses. At all.Children don't do drugs it teenagers and adults. The state recognizes anyone under the age of 18 as a child. That includes teenagers.And we have the freedom to do whatever the heck we want. Except murder, rape, stealing, loitering (in some places) possessing nuclear missiles, giving away money, arson etc.That doesn't sound like freedom.It's our choice what we do to ourselves. Not the government If you don't care what the government says, why do you want the government to recognize it as a legal substance?
legalize marajuana

False information. Sorry dude. Being stoned and driving makes you a more capable driver. It boosts your senses and reflexes. I have no idea where you get your shitty information from but it's untrue. Also, they make you more capable to think correctly and stable. Children don't do drugs it teenagers and adults. And we have the freedom to do whatever the heck we want. It's our choice what we do to ourselves. Not the government
legalize marajuana

Anyway, marijuana, The drug generally isn't more harmful than alcohol or tobacco if used in moderation. Because tobacco and alcohol are legal doesn't mean they should be legal. For instance, the prohibition of alcohol was a complete failure because it was already widely used. If we are to legalize weed, surely such extensive use will follow, making it impossible to ever effectively illigalize it ever again. Limiting the use of the drug intrudes on personal freedom. So is illigalizing murder. How marujana effects the world for the worse: Stoned driving (Not much better than drunk driving)Child related drug abuse (Children shouldn't do drugs period)Counter-Culture (Some people don't want to see weed commercials)Encouraging irresponsiblity (Its hard to take anything seriously while stoned) All of my opponents arguments gone, mine stand. Lame debate.
Rap battle

you don't even show your religion that's something im really not diggn' I think your afraid to tell what you believe That's something that oughta be reprieved You said your here to practice that means you must not have good tactics Your rhymes are still poor I oughta shut the door your raps make me throw up on the floor My sister could rap better then you just like I am already doing to you sorry honey not a dis it means our raps should be dismissed You got no skill well heres the bill one hundred dollas for broken ears! do you need a receipt? your raps are too nice like a birds teet teet! your for abortion that is sad I bet they tried to abort your dad! late term abortion that's just mean are you running for drama queen? your looking for networking your at the wrong place go to face book and show your real face! your for gay marriage that's just ew hope those gays don't get to you you say more the merrier is very false its because your lonely and cant do the waltz! This concludes my sexy rhymes the audience owes me nickels and dimes your poor raps cause child crimes my verses go very unmatched because your talent never hatched!
Rap battle

I'm sorry, was that an attempt to rap?I think it's time for a little recap.Your insults hit as hard as a little love tap.My lyrical homicide will put you down for your nap. B1tch, please, there's girls all over me.I get so many calls I never get a moment free.I'm a badas.s mutherfvcker, it's a royal decree.All girls open their legs for me like I have the master key.You say your a Christian and you believe in God.I hate to break it to you, but your belief is flawed.The entire premise of Jesus is a giant fraud.All it does is justify putting people in front of the firing squad.You little immature b1tch, don't you know?I'm the mutherfvcker who's running this show.My raps are amazing, yours are just so-so.I am the winner of this rap, it was known long ago.
Rap battle

your shameful raps make nobody clap they are so bad you ought to get slapped your beats are poor I got no urge snap their way to tangy like sour tree sap Your raps are shameful this is a dizzy do even god has no faith in you your rhymes got little sublime my raps are right and are very fine You got no girls because your single That means you don't have the guts to mingle Come on baby don't be shy I'll be nice but it'll be just a lie I win this round I raped around town good luck, your raps make you look like a clown
Rap battle

Excuse me, little missy, but I'm a little confused.I thought with vicious raps these rounds would be infused.While your shameful skills make me feel amused,at the end of the day, my raps will make you feel abused.I'm a fighter, I'm brighter, I'm gonna win this brawl.When you leave this battle, it will be at a crawl.My rhymes will demolish you like a massive cannon ball.In the end, it'd be safer if you went back to your shopping mall.
Russia is Justified for Not Allowing Gay Marriage and Gay Propaganda

Recommended Guide, Not MandatoryRound 1: Opening ArgumentsRound 2: RebuttalsRound 3: Finishing StatementsJustified1.) having, done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason.Let it be known to Con that it is illegal to marry, it is not illegal to be homosexual or engage in homosexuality (such as a man and man kissing on the street or private matters in residencies) [1]. Much of the Western World had criticized Russia for their laws which bar homosexual couples from being able to marry. The federal government of Russia has dictated that the law came by the reasoning to protect minors and due to the overwhelming majority of the people to ban the marriage [2]. Homosexuality is not officially considered a mental illness in Russia, although it is considered unnatural and a biological controversy. Under the principles of democracy and the controversy concerning discrimination and prejudice, Russia does not condone employment discrimination in many private and federal branches of the nation. The Russian military has a Don't Ask, Don't Tell [1, again] policy in order to prevent discrimination. As I said before, gay prejudice in Russia is prevalent, yet still illegal. Russia has taken measures in order to maintain peace during attacks on gay communities. There is no international law dictating whether homosexual marriage bans are an affront to human rights, and independent organizations have no basis to claim the Russian federal government is homophobic, they are abiding to democratic values. I will save more of my argument for my opponent, whom I wish good luck. I should also say that I am not homophobic or against gay marriage, I have no opinion on the topic if a person decides to label me as prejudiced. Sources[1] https://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://www.themoscowtimes.com...
Russia is Justified for Not Allowing Gay Marriage and Gay Propaganda

Thank you for your argument, Con. Your opening statement isn't a point against my case. I never said any sort of union relating to gay marriage was legal in Russia. My argument is not proving that marriage is legal, my argument is persuasion that Russia is just in their federal decision to ban gay marriage. "There may be justifications for the ban, but there is no true legitimate reason the ban exists." is a controversial statement. Without legitimate reason, there isn't justification although you said the ban is justified which is a concession to the entire debate. In Russia, and in many other countries where ideological and socio-political regulations are different, liberties are strained and the public is comfortable with the form of life in their homelands. This means that homosexuality is not considered as a form of sexual expression (According to the private organization of the American Psychiatric Association) as the common definition of it's practice is [1] in Russia. It's considered unnatural and a threat to the well-being of their children's minds. "The government is not, nor should be, by any means required to recognize gay marriage, or any marriage at all, but banning it is restricting the right to free association." is another controversial statement. There is no gray area in two sided decisions. There is either a recognition of homosexual marriage or union or there isn't, and 80% of Russia says there shouldn't be. 'The needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few' and due to socio-political perspective on whether homosexuality is a liberty and the lack of factual statements to dictate that homosexual marriage is a right can not be proven. Therefore, the foundation of your argument is assumed to be subjective as there are too many variables to properly influence the argument into the side of 'Yes, it is a right'. Social contracts in other nations differ. Russia does not share the American constitution. There are serious restrictions on freedom of speech, association, petition, etc. This doesn't mean those restrictions are bad, it means that in Russia liberties are few and far between moderated by the government which is what the Russian people are used to and comfortable with concerning their trust to the government. This means the argument of freedoms and liberties becomes another matter of perspective and factual arguments are virtually minimal. Sources[1] https://en.wikipedia.org...
Russia is Justified for Not Allowing Gay Marriage and Gay Propaganda

In the Russian Federation, it is illegal to marry OR enter a civil union as a homosexual.[1] Let it be known that marriage accords civil benefits to the couple, including being able to file joint tax returns, inheritances, and other government benefits.Justified: 1.) having, done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason.There may be justifications for the ban, but there is no true legitimate reason the ban exists. Liberty is a natural right of human beings[2]; by denying homosexuals or other LGBT persons the liberty to marry, the government is ridding them of rights entitled to them as humans. The government is not, nor should be, by any means required to recognize gay marriage, or any marriage at all, but banning it is restricting the right to free association.Sources [1] https://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://www.crf-usa.org...
Immigrants ought to fully assimilate culturally for the good of the host country

I argue that while some assimilation is necessary, full assimilation is not: that it is better for the good of the host country if both the immigrants and the long-time inhabitants assimilate to some extent to each other's cultures. BOP is shared. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . Definitions: Immigrants: People who've migrated to another country permanently or for a relatively long period of time. Full cultural assimilation: The process of adapting or adjusting to the culture of the host country in a way that results in the complete loss of previous culture(s). Host country: The country hosting the immigrants.