The Zimmerman verdict was just.

1. Manslaughter"Zimmermans actions the night of Trayvon Martin's death is an act of culpable negligence... He disregarded Sanford Police Dispatch's order not to pursue Trayvon Martin"The police dispatcher is a civilian, with no actual authority, other than to call in an ambulance/police car/ firetruck. It was a recommendation. Reasonable caution was enacted. Arg"Confronted Trayvon Martin and entered a scuffle that neither the prosecution nor the defense can say for certain who instigated the scuffle. "He confronted him by asking questions, because their had been a string of robberies in the neighborhood, and a suspicious character (Trayvon himself) was walking through the neighborhood. Since nobody knows who instigated the scuffle, and George Zimmerman must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, we must assume that George did not start it, because the prosecution did not prove that George did start it beyond a reasonable doubt. For those of you who do not reside in the U.S, according to the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, the prosecution must prove the accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt."However, Section 3 of 776.013 does not justify Zimmerman's action for reason. Excessive foe was used the night of Trayvon Martin's death when Martin was found dead with a bag of Skittles and Iced Tea. Martin was not found with any weapons that could end Zimmerman's life nor were there any indications that Martin attempted to strangle Zimmerman."George Zimmerman had already been injured multiple times in the back of the head, and had a seriously injured nose. The law does not say that the aggresser has to be armed. The law simply states that "A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony." This means that George Zimmerman only needed to be in the mental state of Fight or Flight, in a state where he was being harmed and legitamately believed his life or physical health was being threatened. Voice analysis is unclear, but somebody was yelling for help (http://www.washingtontimes.com...-/). Coupled with the testimony provided previously, at some point Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman. We don't have a lot of evidence, but the evidence provided is in favor of Zimmerman. Remember, the threat need not have been real, it only had to be legitimately percieved by Zimmerman. 2. Reguarding lack of evidence "We can thank Sanford Police Department for its hurried investigation and botched handling of the case for lack of evidence regarding second degree murder."Ah, but you forget that the governor got involved and hired a special prosecuter to take over the case. The prosecution didn't provide enough evidence either at the local or state level. No matter why their wasn't any evidence, at the end of the day, their was not enough to convict, and the jury agrees.3. Juror B37"While Juror B37 placed more blame on Trayvon Martin than George Zimmerman, she still acknowledges that Zimmerman went too far."This is a fallacy. You bring in the juror's opinion as support for your arguments, yet ignore the not guilty verdict unanimously reached. Opening conclusions:"Zimmerman's acquittal is actually nothing more than another case where Florida Statute 776.013 is turned into a complicated law that can harbor criminals."The complexity of the law is irrelevant, the fact is, the aquittal is in compliance with the law.