I Will Not Contradict Myself

"VIOLATED RULE: In Rounds 2-4, PRO will answer all of CON's questions with Yes, No, or an explanation as to why neither answer would be completely correct."Explanation: A reason or justification given for an action or belief.If I didn't answer yes or no, I gave other words, for a reason or or justification of yes/no being inaccurate. Drop this point.I now realize that I could of been more speicific, but regardless I still gave an explanation when yes/no was inaccurate. ----------Accused Contradictions----------1) Bush and Immigration: Vmpire said "I never mentioned the DREAM act." In actuality, if you look in R3, he listed as a contradiction: "Funny how George W Bush supports immigration and the DREAM act [3]. Also, many administration officials under GWB also support the DREAM act." No mention of border control. Therefore, since CON could not refute this point honestly, DROP this contradiction.2) Religious Ideals Vs. Abortion "The general gist is that abortion is seen as immoral by Christians." I said that [on specific morals/ principles] : "It varies on which branch of Christianity you are part of though." My opponent never asked me to clarify on which branch of Christianity I am part of, so my opponent was not able to distinguish if my branch of Christianity supports/ or opposes abortion.Not a contradiction.3) Obama and Gun BansObama opposed national or state gun bans, but supported local gun laws. His reason is to lower illegal gun usage, but the federal and state governments should respect the 2nd amendment. Thus, no contradiction here. http://www.ontheissues.org...Plus, Obama didn't support the gun ban, a staff worker of his answered the questionnaire, NOT Obama, and Obama regarded the position filled in as incorrect (same source as above). NO contradiction. 4) Drug LegalizationAbout Obama, in R2 I said "You would have to be more specific" Since my opponent did not become more specific on this topic (for example, he didn't ask if I supported Obama's views on drugs), this cannot be regarded as a contradiction.5) Bush and Death Penalty I said in R2 that I oppose Bush's views, BUT "Some actions I would support if they were reformed." Thus, the position of Bush on the DP is different from mine, and I oppose his, but if Bush changed his position to make the DP only conservatively used, then we would have the same viewpoint. But Bush hasn't changed his position, and this isn't a contradiction.6) China and the USEnemy may be defined as a hostile state, but hostile is defined as: Unfriendly; antagonistic.The US and China hold different views, but we aren't that unfriendly with China and certainly not antagonisitc. Therefore, we are not enemies. No contradiction.7) 7. Inanimate Life and the EarthBecause of Rule 9, I can define what Earth is since you didn't include it in your question. Earth is defined as: The planet on which we live, the 3rd planet from the sun.I think that where we live is in many ways sad, in other ways not. No contradiction.8) Aid and Focusing on our HomeI don't see a contradiction here. We can help nations overseas, but as I said earlier, our primary concern should be here at home.Thanks Vmpire for the debate, this is for 16k's tournament.