Christian Ethics according to Liberal "Christian" Sects are unchristian.*

Notice: After a Character count my opponent used more time being analectic that arguing, he spent more time reviewing the argument than arguing, I will honor his waste of characters and consider his claims. (1 to Zets). Also - He has not refuted any of my points, just presented his own; a possible refutation my be his attack on my basis of the Old testament. _____________ Reply to Review _____________ 1. The terms of a Debate are unto one's skills. If one thinks they are "saving a debate" by their standards, so it be so, but the Instigators rules must be adhered. There are a select terms that are proposed by the Instigator the Contender is obligated to adhere to this, think of it like a Pact of agreement. My Terms to this debate which you broke: I) Select five or more of the topics you disagree with and debate them. If one thinks 3 of 4 rounds is insufficient time, with pity… shame. II)(assume) Debate with skill and not question the consistency of an argument. Calling my resolve vague still doesn't give you the ability to snap out the rules. The Last round of R1 seems clear enough for a normal assumption. 2. My arrogance? Same can be said about your posts (Zets -1)(John-1): -Therefore my opponent's entire argument based on the old testament is irrelevant, vague and misinterpreted. It shows my opponent's clear lack of understanding of Christianity - put forth a half hearted argument that misuses old testament law when it is clearly irrelevant, and has attempted to claim the conduct point as his own when he clearly deserve to lose it. - I suggest you take this debate seriously and put forth an argument that is worth refuting. 3. Do I need a warning to denounce a possible misconception? Think of it as guidance before you waste you next post. You perishing it as an insult is purely at your fault,is it doubt, maybe? 4. Yes indeed I forfeited a round, I was busy. (-1 to Zets) 4.5. Yes they are irrelevant, Sin and God have no connection to this debate. Sin is an action against gods will, and though the action of homosexuality is sin it has no connection to this debate which questions the whether Christians are against homosexuality. God is Christ, not Christians or Christianity, this debate is of the followers of Christ the followed presence is irrelevant. _____________ Argument _____________ As I said before he has not refuted by argument, so I'll refute his. I will do this in two parts. >>God is unchanging<< The New and Old Testament are of one the same god, for the errors of Paul (see "Of Paul"). I will answer with the famous quote: "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. " >>Misunderstandings and Of Paul<< Paul is not a Prophet he is a seer. If you know these books you would know that these are letters the people of the books name. Paul talks of his time with Jesus as a disciple he talks of his own perception of Christ's word not as a scribe but as a recount, he is uncitable. The word of God is taken from the GOSPELS the Story of Jesus Christ Luke, Mathew, Mark, John. So… For Romans 10: 4 for Galatians 3:23-25 and Ephesians 2: 15 They are all Letters from Paul to other Christian groups; my Citation overrules the word of Paul. Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. -Mathew 5,17 For Matthew 22:36-40 Your argument is that Jesus destroys the old Covenant of Moses in as sense destroys the 10 commandments. Homosexuality falls under the sins of adultery. Jesus says I come to restore the covenant and not to destroy it again Mathew 5:17-19, It's not the first time I've had to use this. Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. Citations: [ . http://en.wikisource.org...(King_James)/]