Dwyane Wade is better than LeBron James

Counter 3rd Round Arguments... and 4th round - My opponent still Holds onto the 100 points Can equal 10 steals Theory. My opponent says that there is no way to determine what amount of steals can equal a total amount of points. I agree with this statement, however I do not agree with my opponent when he said that since James won on points and rebounds and that Wade won on steals and blocks that it makes it a tie. This is comparing points, rebounds, steals, assists, and blocks as if they can all be on the same parallel. - Wade playing Forward Wade cannot play power forward EVER. The part where my opponent says that since Wade has great offensive post moves (for his position) this makes him able to play power forward. My opponent is just trying say that Wade can be the same player as James with throwing out unrealistic possibilities like Wade playing power forward if he could. Wade cannot post enough rebounds and he does not have the size to play a small forward... face it. Wade can only play two positions effectively where as James can play four effectively. Offensive post moves does not make one a better forward. James has the size to play the forward position and the eyes to play the point. Wade does not have the size to play big... guard set offensive post moves does not help if one is 6'4' going against a 6'9' forward. - MVP I never said MVP= best player. I said, that MVP awards are a mark of true greatness. The MVP award is basically a team and individual effort. The team rallies around the best player, while the best player performs to such greatness that the league has no choice but to give him the award. The award is usually given to the top performing player on the top teams. This means that of the top performing teams, the award is usually given to the top performing player of those teams. It could be Nowitski, Nash, Stoudemire, James, Duncan, Bryant, etc. It is not someone from a losing team. Usually means most of the time, not all of the time. It is also a team effort because the team has to do well in order for the player on that team to be considered as the MVP. James won this award twice while Wade has won none. - I Do Not Think That the Readers Care if Wade won the Finals MVP compared to James Finals Run The reason I say this is because even if James did pick that team, well the Law says this. Even if he did, he was the only main source of points on that team. There was nobody on James' team that could contribute to James' team the way that Shaq contributed to the Heat. The Heat never made a Finals run with Wade until they got Shaq. Shaq averaged his 20 points and 10 rebounds a game so he was a huge factor. When a player feels like they are alone in contributing to a team victory, like how James must have been feeling, their performance usually falters. Example, Kobe Bryant in the playoffs against the Suns where he bombed the last game of a seven game series playing terribly because he felt alone. James took the Cavs to the Finals by himself, Wade did so with O'Neal. - 36 Minutes I noticed that my opponent never refuted my point about James playing the most minutes. He just shrugged it off as if it had no importance. When my opponent was mentioning finding out if players do not match up, he only mentioned the amount of games one plays. He never mentions Wade's minutes on the team as of present day. As of now, Wade is behind James in minutes because James is a higher priority than Wade. My opponents excuse is on how stats fluxuate so one cannot determine who will win the stat battles. As of now James still leads with more points, way more assists, and way more rebounds, and more steals than Wade has this season. http://www.nba.com... -Opponent Uses 36 min stats as an Excuse to Compare Players My opponent uses 36 min stats to compare players, he also admits that other players stats in the league can be identical to the stars of the league. He says that games played and player dimensions also tie in to determining if a player stacks up as a star. My opponent says there is a problem with using present stats because they play on the same team. I do not see a problem here. I see a direct comparison in the players now that they are competing for stats. Putting both players on the same team helps one to make more educated comparisons instead of looking dumb by comparing players on different teams. My opponent says that since Wade plays less minutes he makes up for it with stats... well let me give the readers the clues... -My opponent says that games played, can play a role in determining if Wade can stack up to James... Wade played less games. - My opponent says player dimensions stack up. James has stats that display of a guard and forwards stats while Wade only displays guard like stats in comparison to the top guards and forwards. Wade plays less minutes than James. - Therefore if we look at The Law's logic, James is better than Wade in comparison.