There is evidence for Noah's flood narrative

Pro claims that snopes.com gives no references for this claim that the gadget used was not scientific. However Pro failed to notice that this was not actually claim made by snopes.com but a direct quote from Andrew Snelling. All that Pro had to do was carefully read the sentence before that said "summarized briefly as follows: " and he can click on the link on Andrew Snelling's name on snopes.com to read the full article. Pro then probably accidentally included an article in his sources (http://www.anchorstone.com...) that talks about box that could contain the bones. The rest of his argument is essentially a series of paraphrasing and quoting from the article from pilgrimpromo.com written by Mary Wyatt without any references. It is interesting to note that Pro is keen on the need for references when it comes to snopes. However if you look at the pilgrimpromo.com article there are no references. Why the double standard? He takes two topics from the article: 1. The Molecular Frequency Generator 2. The claims of Arthur Brandenburger The Molecular Frequency Generator Pro attempts to make it seems as the "Molecular Frequency Generator" is legitimate. He claims that it has been verified to be "professional". If you do a simple google search on "Molecular Frequency Generator" you will find several sites that describe how these devices are claim too work. Here is an explanation of why they seem to work: http://www.geotech1.com... Even in Pro's link they describe the device as follows: "The user receives this electromagnet wave back onto his body. In this device, the human body is used as a living conductor or antenna in the same way your reception improves when you touch the rabbit ears or antenna contact on the back of your television. The receiver holds in his hands, two wands that attract to each other when the electromagnetic field of his body is disturbed in the proper direction. The human body has two electromagnetic fields- one positive, one negative. In Ron's case, he used a battery and coils to increase this body field. In the "Filter King" device,...the wands are specially selected to be more responsive to the electromagnet disturbance" You can see that this is describing a dowsing rod. You take the antenna in your hands and the antenna "attract" each other when you find what you were looking for. Here is a more in depth description of what dowsing really is: Claims of Arthur Brandenburger Pro incorrectly paraphrases the pilgrimpromo.com article. Pro makes the claim: "Dr. Arthur Brandenburger, a geophysicist of Los Alamos national lab.s in new Mexico said ""I have no doubt at all that the object is a ship. In my entire career I have never seen an object like this in a stereo photo"." However, if you read the article carefully you will see that the geophysicist from Los Alamos is not Arthur Brandenburger, but John Baumgardner. Arthur Brandernburger is actually a professor of photogrammetry from Ohio State University. Pro needs to do a better job at not confusing these people and presenting a clear history of what happened. According to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org...) Arthur Brandenberger saw photographs of the site and conclude that it was not a man made structure. He later went to the site in the 1960s and found nothing but soil and rocks after blasting. I have tried to find out more about Arthur Brandenberger online but he only mostly comes up in quotes by site claiming that the site is Noah's ark. In the 80s David Fasold and John Baumgardner the geophysicist. Both David Fasold and John Baumgardner eventually reached the conclusion that the site was not Noah's Ark. In 1996 John Baumgardner wrote a letter explaining his conclusion that the site is just a natural formation (http://www.tentmaker.org...). The fact that Baumgardner conclude that this was not the resting plac of the ark was ommited from the article that Pro linked to. Later Pro quotes from the pilgrimpromo article that Baumgardner wrote in a newsletter in 1988. I ask Pro to give us a link to this newsletter by Baumgardner.