Earth Is Absolutely Immobile

He directs his statement to the Inquisitors-General! Oh. my. gosh. I know, but I quoted Galileo twice, once to the Inquisition, and once to friend. Both times he admitted he was wrong about the Earth moving. You say that your paraphrasing but you don't provide further information on what you changed in the quote. What? Yes I did. I used brackets to indicate where I altered the original quote. If anyone suspects I deceptively altered the meaning of the original quotes, they can follow my sources to see the originals. HaHa. You said that the small gravity of the moon can cause large tides... But: 1) Doesn't that mean that the moons gravity would affect Foucault's pendulum? Yet it doesn't? 2) And if large stars and galaxies are bigger than the moon... Whouldn't we have more tides? Yet we don't? Yes, the moon does indeed affect the pendulum. But the moon orbits Earth in the same direction as the stars, so yea... I think that answers your objection. Yes, the galaxies and stars are larger than the moon, but they are also further away. So I think that deals with that objection too. And you provide no factual evidence to back yourself up. You can't even refute Foucault's pendulum (http://en.wikipedia.org........) because you don't have facts other than some faulty quote from one guy! Making your argument (again) with no value. This is like what? The hundreth time you say my quotes are false and my arguments have no value? lol 1) You are too lazy to find legit proof 2) You know that I'm right and you have no proof lol You just said yourself that the chance of the Axis of Evil actually having any relationship to Earth is "less than 0.1%" I was just pointing out how amazing it is that Earth is on the Axis. I was not questioning the reality that it does. Just saying that the Axis doesn't line up with Earth for no reason. It's because the universe rotates around Earth, duhh. We wouldn't get blown away because of a thing called the atmosphere and gravity No you got it backwards. We would get blown away specifically because of the atmosphere. If Earth is spinning at 1k mph and flying faster than a bullet around the sun, then the winds would be hundreds of miles an hour (like they are on other planets that actually move). Unless of course, gravity was so strong that it held the atmosphere down, however, the fact that I can walk through the atmosphere freely proves that it's being held very loosely by Earth's gravity. This means that, if Earth were really moving, the relative movement between the Earth and the atmosphere would be WILD. Like, Neptune, Venus, Saturn, Jupiter, etc. wild... and all those planets got winds of over 200 mph, some of them in the 10s of 1000s of mph! e.g. the winds on Saturn can hit 75,000 mph But Earth? Sometimes the winds are zero mph. Because Earth is moving at ZERO mph. Look at the sources and read it yourself. I would love to see you try to refute this point. I just refuted it. The only proof that you have showing us that the Coriolis affect is caused by stars is a faulty quote with no source! Huh? I did give a source, and a very good one too. I cited the book Relational Mechanics written by physics professor Dr. Assis. The next round will be for my own entertainment. And my entertainment, as you fail miserably to rebut any of my arguments Great Debate! YES! never thought I'd argue for this side of the debate lol btw I didn't see a graphic in your last round :P now you have to put at least two in this one to make up for it