the Qur'an holds more truth and is more advance in a sense than the bible.

Well, now we come to the end. This has certainly been interesting. "i (sic) was trying to tell you that even if it was by mere coincidence it is still right so therefore you are accepting this as true." I am doing nothing of the kind, which I'll explain below more fully. 3) As to your coincidence argument, I thought that the entire point was to prove the Qu'ran has information which could not have been gained by observation and common knowledge, hence more truthful than the Bible. If the data could be observed or deduced by anyone, like I said before, it does not need divine intelligence, so proving nothing. 3d) Believe me I read through your arguments very carefully. If the term refers to the ovum too, then it proves the point, as this would be an error of fact. The ovum is not emitted in fluid except by menstruation, which by definition would be the opposite from creating life. Since you tell me the word "sulb" refers to two different pieces of anatomy depending on the gender, and has many possible meanings, I can only say that seems needlessly complicated. One would imagine that an omniscient being is capable of more clarity, such as saying "human beings are created by a gushing fluid emitted from the loins (not between them and the ribs, or any other ambiguity) which then develops inside the womb." See? Much more clearer. Even if I grant this to you, there is still no explanation for the "man came from dust" verse. 4) I'm aware of how many planets exist, thanks. By your count we still have only eight (Pluto no longer being counted). So where are these missing three planets? 6) Fine by me. 7) My friend, the verse said "blood." That is obviously not flesh. It's simple really. new1) The "followers of Darwinism"? Charles Darwin was not a prophet-he was wrong on some things, and in others he simply couldn't know of all the advances science would bring. The idea of "Darwinism" in this sense is erroneous. Just an issue that I thought needed clarifying. Pro has it backward. We evolved from a woman and man, not one single man. Otherwise this would not be listed as an error. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... Con2) Madinan Surah, chapter 5, verses 27-31. Con3) Yes-just noticed it was made twice, my bad. Same arguments hold. Con4) Makkan Surah, chapter 35, verse 1: "Praise be to Allah, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, Who appointeth the angels messengers having wings two, three and four. He multiplieth in creation what He will. Lo! Allah is able to do all things." vs. Madinan Surah, chapter 6, verses 100-101: "Yet they ... impute falsely, without knowledge, sons and daughters unto Him. ... The Originator of the heavens and the earth! How can He have a child?" Con5) Madinan Surah, chapter 3, verse 85: "Whoso seeketh as religion other than the Surrender (to Allah) it will not be accepted from him, and he will be a loser in the Hereafter" and Madinan Surah, chapter 5, verse 72: "They surely disbelieve who say: Lo! Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary. ... Lo! whoso ascribeth partners unto Allah, for him Allah hath forbidden paradise. His abode is the Fire. For evil-doers there will be no helpers." vs. Madinan Surah, chapter 2, verse 62: "Those who are Jews, and Christians, and Sabaeans - whoever believeth in Allah and the Last Day and doeth right - surely their reward is with their Lord, and there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve" and Madinan Surah chapter 5, verse 69: "Lo! those who believe, and those who are Jews, and Sabaeans, and Christians - Whosoever believeth in Allah and the Last Day and doeth right - there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve." Con6) Madinan Surah, chapter 4, verse 3: "Marry of the women, who seem good to you, two or three or four; and if ye fear that ye cannot do justice (to so many) then one (only) or (the captives) that your right hands possess." vs. Madinan Surah, chapter 4, verse 129 (in the same chapter no less): "Ye will not be able to deal equally between (your) wives, however much ye wish (to do so)." Con7) Makkan Surah, chapter 39, verse 4: "If Allah had willed to choose a son, He could have chosen what He would of that which He hath created." vs. Madinan Surah, chapter 6, verses 100-101: "Yet they ... impute falsely, without knowledge, sons and daughters unto Him. ... The Originator of the heavens and the earth! How can He have a child?" If all things are of pairs, surely animals fall under that, according to the Qu'ran? We know this is not so however. Pro is missing my point in this. It indicates that someone else is writing, besides Allah, which is why I linked it. Allah is supposed to have dictated the Qu'ran no, so this would be a fault with that. I will not be adding any more contradictions or other arguments-that would hardly be fair, therefore you will have no need of an argument in the comments. I realize that instigating means giving up the last word which we all like to have so certainly I'm not going to take advantage of that. I'd hope this has demonstrated to voters that the Qu'ran does not hold more truth than the Bible. Thus I urge you to vote Con. I am not Muslim, but I'm happy to accept any blessing from you in the spirit it's given. This has been fun :)