Intelligent Design VS The Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and Evolution

I accept and I will state my case. (and yes I will bring up micro-biology experiments such as the flagellum argument) Intelligent Design can be construed two different ways by the way. One version, is from an all powerful deity who created life in the universe and ourselves (as you plainly stated) However, the other "take on the tale" of that is extraterrestrial intelligent design (E.T visitors furthering and developing mankind's genetic sequence from previous ancestors for a use such as labor or simple experimentation with native organic life.) So first, we should ask. Are you debating pro for a universally intelligent all powerful designer or extra terrestrial life. Also, I will not reply to "I feel this is correct" syndrome, and unsubstantiated claims will not be replied to. (Don't throw bible verses at me because the Bible is an unsubstantiated claim and thus has no bearing in a fact base debate) First, I would like to say that evolution and Abiogenesis are two separate theories and I'm glad you acknowledged that. To start, there is no evidence that intelligent design is true what-so-ever however, there is proof that at one point simplified life forms did indeed exist on the planet. To prove this, one must examine sedimentary rock and rock layers. The farther back we go, the less diverse, the less complex and the less evolved the species we see. We will never find the "first life form" as fossilization does not typically occur and even less so on small organisms not to mention cellular organisms with no proper "structure" to them such as bones, sinew, and flesh. To briefly cover the "flagellum" argument, and the flaws of spectators there of from your perspective. Scientist took simple one tailed bacteria and placed them in a controlled condition in a laboratory. In these controlled conditions after several generations the bacteria underwent several mutations. Firstly, bacteria use two primary substances to survive, one is surfactant which is used primarily to help the bacteria move. They lay down this slippery foam basically and use it as a highway for other bacteria to use. The second is Biofilm which is what the bacteria use to anchor it self to eat and digest with other bacteria in a form of protection. Scientist took these samples of bacteria and through controlled study in a series of petri dishes scientist found that over several "lifetimes" (generations) the bacteria gradually mutated into having three tails (flagellum) for faster mobility. Also, because there was no direct threat to the bacteria and because organisms can only expend and consume so much energy the bacteria created less biofilm and covered a larger area faster inside the petri dish. This is proof of evolution occuring. Also, you can't "not" include both forms of evolution's definition just to fit your case better. Make sure to put in "all" of your google definitions next time not just half. Along with your definition evolution is also "the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form." (google) more specifically the processes performed by organisms that help to adapt, survive, and speciate over time to their current environments. Meaning that should there suddenly be no freshwater on earth all of the freshwater fish would either need to "evolve" (adapt) a tolerance for salt water and those species who could not evolve would die off. This being said, a catastrophic change (a change happening dramatically and with sudden ferocity) would have few to no survivors in most instances. Meaning that there would be no time to evolve or adapt resulting in extinction. The evolution of species, the big bang, and abiogenesis have no direct correlation with one another. The big bang is how the universe started, cosmologically that is all it covers. Evolution is not the start of life, life is the start of evolution. Abiogenesis is a touchy issue when it comes to how it is defined. As abiogenesis is basically the random collection of amino acids from the proposed "primordial soup" where RNA combined with amino acids (which would of ended up forming together and forming a relationship to each other) to create DNA. DNA then went on to form the first cell, from there the first few cells, to the first micro-organisms, and eventually expanding into the broad category of species we know today, by separating and forming independently in what eventually became different environments (which would of taken millions if not billions of years) and lead to diversification, specification, and the individual lifeforms we know today. The Miller urey experiment is a proof of concept experiment that shows this process can and does happen under the right conditions. Amino acids can form from what is basically the "primordial ooze". Though of course over time a number of things could of changed the "ooze" factor. Such as water being introduced to the planet, the earth cooling an thus the ooze hardens into a clay-dirt mixture, or a number of other things. The big bang theory has yet to be proven but evidence and traces of its occurrence are still found today. From galactic static to galaxies separating we can observe phenomena that closely resemble the aftermath of an explosion. Leading way to the big bang theory. (an added note, it's becoming a popular idea that in the center of our universe is a massive black hole, over time as entropy takes place it will continue to consume matter and grow larger, eventually consuming all the matter of our universe and collapsing in on itself, leading to yet another "big bang" a continuous cycle we can never hope to see) Now that I've stated my case, I will quickly address yours and give you something to refute. There is no evidence of a creator of our universe, not to mention our ancestry as being intelligent or with purpose. The closest we get is the hypothetical E.T scenario. (I do not consider this theory seriously, however I do consider it more seriously than a deity or all powerful entity creating our universe and all the life among it.) Intelligent design means everything should have a purpose, however, as time goes on we see that less and less things "make sense" we have junk DNA, mutations, genetic flaws and characteristics from different regions depending where we are from. Just like common animals. Life is a bi-product of the universes formation. This is why the majority of our observed galaxies and even our own planet are not inhabitable by us. We are random chance and we happen to have formed here in a moderately temperate planet with individual seasons as a lifeforms that is omnivorous in nature and intelligent by evolution.