All Sins are denial of the Word of God and are Blapshemy.

I am an Islamic Hindu Christian Sikh Mythologist. I am well verse on each of them; Their culture, history, scriptures, philosophies and theories. I have come into my spiritual revelation through personal experiences and with little to no previous knowledge of religion I preconceived a large formula, foundation and sense of spirituality. I later found that via studying these religions That each one expressed, enforced and depicted these preconceived notions. God's holistic existence ~ and each expressing eh same moral values, scientific methods of examining facts, etc. Through a holistic perspective of reality one does not hold biases - even to their own detriment - and they do not diminish even the smallest facts to vindicate their actions ~ They account for all contributing factors, circumstances (throughout all perceivable following events) and Consequences. As such, we have determined that cultures from many generations- Eras - ethnicities, social classes. cultures and environments have produced the same social science results: Sins are universally unacceptable. IN an atheistic world, SINS are all blasphemy regardless because their, and their proceeding, negative consequences are not secret. It is not ignorance to commit them. Regardless of law, the effects are blatant. Because there is no ignorance, but only arrogance, It is blasphemy. IN every religion all the same sins are sins. Do not deny the words of the prophet ~ a prophet can be distinguished from a charlatan by his fruit. THIS clause resolves all arguments concerning Charlatans. Lying to oneself is detrimental to ones own behavioural flaws, and creates tension and conflicts for not only the one lying, but also the lives of all people who no longer will receive the fruits of the victims lack of prosperity. The mathematical consequences are Irreprovable; the personal; the cultural; the environmental etc... Increase of desolation and decreased prosperity both. To review the actual sins themselves is redundant. But we can do that. It is redundant because this is a Theoretical, Ideological Debate - I had not decreed which sins were unforgivable - only that all were Blasphemy (Denial of the Word of God). Blasphemy is by definition: Denial of the Word of God (Truth; Wisdom; Righteousness etc.). Example: Adultery corrupts the imagination, ambitions and morals of the population around the accused. It creates social injustice, depression, disregard of sex victims, enablement of womanizers, association with criminals, glorification of Capitalist selfishness, neglect of poverty, premature parents & single parents. Advocates perversion to children, womanizers, criminals, perverts, asshols, etc. And creates an ait of security for young girl which results in sex trafficking, Rape and abuse, - Desolation These effects go hand in hand with adultery regardless of ones efforts. And It is Blasphemy to vindicate one's sins by disregarding the consequences and selfishness because of a larger situation ~ thus sponsoring and feeding it. I feel I have address the topic of concern. Please re-evaluate the Actual debate we are having, and do not let emotion detour your arguments into redundancies BY trying to make this about things like, "There is no contrary belief and NO argument can be made to suggest any religion ever suggested there is forgiveness for Sin." when the debate is about, "All Sins are denial of the Word of God and are Blasphemy." If this was somehow unknown. You were, as my opponent responsible for clearing up any questions before hand. Thank you.