We should have lab rats in labatories

Thank you for your rebuttals and defending your case. It was a very fun debate. I will defend my case, and state my conclusion, then it is my opponent's turn and the debate ends. I just want to say that it was very fun. Observations1. True. The BOP is shared mostly but is more on my side because I am the instignator of this debate and also of many other reasons. Pro's case. In here I will post all my opponents case's and defend them and rebut them. "1. Death and Harm. Con strays from the prompt. He starts this contention talking about rats, and then shifts to mice. Mice are non-topical, by Con's own definitions. I see this as an effort by Con to push me to defend all animal testing rather than just testing of rats, which is all I have to do. This does expand HIS burden, though. Risk exists, independent of the test subject. But pre-clinical trials are extremely important for establishing safety, which absolutely must be done. So, what should we test? Note that these mice aren't getting captured. They're often bred specifically for the lab, which means they've only known captivity. If scientists didn't do this, they would have to capture them and bring them into the lab. I'd personally say that that's worse, but more importantly, they would lose a number of genetic mutants that make it possible to understand the effects of certain treatments. [1] Without that knowledge, it would be impossible to study things like diabetes, kidney disease, immune system disorders, inflammation, allergic response, transplantation, and countless other problems that don't occur similarly in any animal aside from humans. Con's also unclear on why it matters that we treat mice (or rats) poorly. There are plenty of reasons why humans are preferred to mice, in particular our cognitive abilities make us capable of understanding right from wrong (and yes, if mice suddenly garner that understanding, I would argue against lab testing on them). I'll grant that damage to their populations and freedom is a moral hazard, though I'd say the fact that these are lab-bred rodents means that they were granted their very lives by the system Con's so thoroughly against, which means he's also arguing against the existence of these lives. " This was Pro's first rebuttal. This was just a mistake form me as I said it at my third argument, I just wrote mice instead of rats because it is much easier to write and also say. I know that these mice/rats are not getting actually captured. But then there is a big picture of how they got them. They probably got bought. However they might got stolen. That is basically getting stolen from. Pro just said that I was unclear of how I did not show I told they were poorly treated. This is what I wrote in my argument. 2. Cruelty If you have lab rats, that is just cruel. These animals have their own freedom to do what they want. This is what happened to about 100 million mouses that were raised and dead. These mice had no reason to be dead if it was not for these weird people just stomping in putting these mice in cages and testing these chemicals we do not know is dangerous or not dangerous. Then if it is dangerous these mice get and unfortunate death. These mice are just poor. Pro might think that rats are harms to people, however rats are animals also and they might think us humans are big threats also. This shows that humans are just cruel in these situations and testing it on these innocent rats. 3. These animals have the freedom of choice. This is expanded of what I said in my first and second argument. First of all, animals have freedom to do what they want to do. No one forces humans to get chemical shots and have a risk to die, why not animals? Like I said, these animals are innocent creatures who just want to escape out of their own pity deaths. Instead we destroy their pity lives. Like animals being kept in cages, these mice have the freedom to go out like what the other mice in the world are doing Even though this example is nonsense, it is like this. Imagine that one day, us humans got ruled by mice. They needed to make a these things in their laboratory. However they didn’t know how to test it on. They decided humans. They suddenly forced and trapped these humans and put them in their labs. They test these chemicals things and soon we die. This is basically the switched thing us humans are doing. Our Con team thinks that we should stop this and make no more lab rats. This shows that even these little creatures can be important. No this goes on to the real argument. Humans have rights and freedom. Long time ago they didn’t. Right now even though we don’t have slavery, we have lab rats. Lab rats are basically the same as slavery. Basically we are telling these rats to be tested and they might die, but so what, who cares? They just get a new rat. I think that these rats should have freedoms of not having these tests. This was my argument of my second and third reasons that were about cruelty and freedom of rats. Also just think about it. Do you want your life to be depended on the human's experiments of your death or living?2. Cancer Yes I know this is not infected to us humans. But what if any cancer not found? There is also other cancer that might be infected. Also these things will happen to the mice. There is really now cure for the Parkison Disease. If might infect you. This is why doing these things are dangerous. ConclusionThank you for your debate Whiteflame. It was fun. I think you voters should vote for me because I think I had okay arguments. However, voters just vote on which team you think was stronger and who you think was better, however.