I'm a Detroit-Cleaveland Drug Lord

Argument 1: Cleaveland doesn't existNow, originally, when I looked at the title of the debate, I thought that maybe, 'Cleaveland' was a typo. But no, he included it in the thesis in the first round, the very thing I had to prove against. Therefore, I am forced to mean that my opponent means the City of Cleaveland, and not, say, the City of Cleveland. However, there is no City of Cleaveland. Therefore, my opponent couldn't be a drug lord in it. My opponent states that he is a Detroit-Cleaveland drug lord. With that hyphen, I am to assume that he means that he is both a drug lord in both Cleaveland and in Detroit, a hybrid of the two. But, as I have said, no such city exists. Therefore, he cannot be a Detroit-Cleaveland drug lord, as he can't possibly fill one of the two location conditions of being a Detroit-Cleaveland drug lord.Yeah, I spelled it wrong, but its one of those cultural things. Don't ask me why, but these things developep over long periods of time. This is how a lot of east coast mighiganders say it....."Clev - vea - lindAnd how Ohio people say it..."Kli-vlind Example: People from Ohio often spell Detroit like "Detriot". I think this developed due to distinct accent seperations that happened over long periods of time. I feel the need to explain this, because this seems like an obvious attack for the S&G point.2. Yes, it is an obvious hyphen, and I don't think its neccesary to define it, but I will.... hy·phen the sign (-) used to join words to indicate that they have a combined meaning or that they are linked in the grammar of a sentence (as in pick-me-up, rock-forming), to indicate the division of a word at the end of a line, or to indicate a missing or implied element (as in short- and long-term ). Now, as you can see, I used Detroit-Cleveland in the way I did, to join the words. This is beneficial, as it quickly shows the readers that I'm a Drug Lord that operates out of Detroit and Cleveland. The Hyphen can be used that way, to avoid having to write that all out. I hope you understand that.Pictures of Detroit and Cleveland, just in case---------------------------------------------------------Detroit Cleveland Refutation 1:The title of your first argument doesn't agree with your thesis. You are trying to prove, in the first argument, that you are a Detroit Cleveland drug lord, not a Detroit-Cleaveland drug lord.I'm not quite sure what your saying. your basically just restating that my arguments are invalid due to the use of a hyphen. Refutation 2:Your second argument is false, as I have just proved that it is possible to prove that you are wrong. I've never even been to Detroit, Cleaveland, Cleveland, or wherever you live, yet your argument is wrong. It's obvious that my opponent did not read the argument. It says that he must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt that I'm a Detroit-Cleveland drug lord. Not that he must provide a doubt. reasonable doubt Web definitions Beyond reasonable doubt is the standard of evidence required to validate a criminal conviction in most adversarial legal systems. Generally the prosecution bears the burden of proof and is required to prove their version of events to this standard. ... In translation, my opponent must prove that it is impossible for me to be a Detroit-Cleveland drug lord. I was reasonable, and gave himself a 10% allieviation on beyond a reasonable doubt. So, by the standards of the debate, if there is even an 11% chance I'm a drug lord, then my opponent fails. And going by what he has provided, it is evident that he has brought no evidence that proves I'm not a drug lord operating out of Detroit and Cleveland.Thank you for accepting Daytona, and good luck.