Vocaloid music takes the essence of a human singer

As a brief road map, I will be going Pro then Con. Pro- This will be a weird debate. -(1) I don't understand what you wanted then D: Well, Because the feel of a human singer rationally comes from the voice and dancing... -(1) My opponent's claim is a causation correlation fallacy; they claim because the voice is an imitation of a human voice, that it holds the essence of a human voice. However where we to accept this logic, then it would be impossible to even have the debate in the first place. -(2) My opponent's argument is unwarranted. They claim that their argument is inherently rational, yet they never give us a reason to believe it is rational. The fact that I am opposing this disproves it's inherent rationality, thus there is no substance to the first half of their argument. ... which Vocaloid concerts do both they have a sense of human in them. -(1) My opponent's claim on concerts is also a causation correlation fallacy; because there is human effort, does not mean that there is human essence. Automated telemarketers have human effort, and even sound human; but there is no essence of humanity behind an artificial voice's recording. -(2) As a bit of an extension from the prior rebuttal, the vocaloid songs are too perfect. Because they are digital voices, there are no imperfections to the songs; so called "live" performances don't have the quirks that non-vocaloid concerts do. In a concert with a real person, you get a feel of their voice live, you hear the anomalies when they makes a mistake, you hear it in their voice when they run out of breath; a Vocaloid concert has none of these. -(3) There is no person behind the voice at these concerts; it's either a (poor) hologram, or a video. The only real fun of these concerts is the interaction with other fans. I really didn't expect this to happen in this debate - (1)Again, I don't understand what you wanted. Just because I recognize that the music is not essentially human, does not mean that I don't like the music. Con- = Arguments = Contention 1: Effort and Essence- Essence and effort are not the same thing, and my opponent is making this mistake when presenting their constructive arguments. They assume that because human effort and image are put into vocaloid, that human essence is in vocaloid. However as I said while attacking their case, this is not the case; Just like an automated telemarketer, human effort goes into creation of the telemarketer's voice, and human likeness in an of the way the voice sounds. The voice is however not of human essence whatsoever. Contention 2: Lack of essence- Humans are by nature imperfect, and it is these imperfections that make us us. Vocaloids are by creation perfect, and it is these perfections that make their music what it is. Vocaloids do not have imperfections in their music, thus the critical aspect of humanity does not exist in their music = Conclusion = Just because their music is inhuman, does not mean it isn't good. We listen to inhuman music all the time such as classical music, techno, and instrumentals. Not everything with human effort in it has human essence; and accordingly the vote in this round must go to the Con.