BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Super Mario World is better than Super Mario Bros. 3

I'm really sorry to say this, but unfortunately, I can't post an argument this round. My week has been too busy to work on one. I should definitely be able to post a fourth round argument this weekend. With all due respect to the rules, I would like to request to be able to respond to my opponent's 2nd and 3rd round arguments in the final round, rather than just the 3rd round. If not, I understand. In the meantime, please enjoy this cool series I found on YouTube. It's where this guy plays SMB3 and SMW at the same time. It's a unique tribute to two great games. http://www.youtube.com...
Super Mario World is better than Super Mario Bros. 3

This debate resolution is simple: that Super Mario World is a better game than Super Mario Bros. 3. I will be arguing the Pro side, and my opponent will be arguing the Con side. For the purposes of this debate, only the original releases of the game will be debated - remastered versions of either game will not be factored in to this debate.Definition(s)Better - Superior in qualityRules1. Burden of proof is shared.2. First round is for acceptance only. Round 2 is for opening arguments only (no rebuttals allowed). Round 3 is a clash round (you can only rebut the arguments the opponent made in round 2, and you may not introduce new arguments). Round 4 is for closing arguments (you can rebut arguments made in round 3 and sum up your case)3. Plagarism is prohibited. 4. Forfeiture is prohibited.5. Violating any of these rules results in a win for the non-offending party.
Truth_Seeker vs. GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

This comin’ from a insecure, d*ckless loser? You’re a weak, immature little poser. I’ll remove your balls to make room for ya panties until ya grow ‘em back, just stay with your granny. Should I slam your balls and shoot ‘em like basketballs? Or force my boot into one and throw the other sky-high like footballs? Should I kick ‘em far away like soccerballs? Or whack ‘em back and forth like volleyballs?
Truth_Seeker vs. GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

GamrDeb8rBbrH8r what's this? You sound like a retard in a mental institution But your forgiven cuz God shows mercy to those in need of a divine absolution! Call this a poetic justice n' my raps are the wisdom Cuz i'm wipin' this bug clean straight off the system! This is judgement passed n' you just been stoned I'm runnin' a slave trade n' you just been owned I've devastated rappers off the stars now you'll need a new hope! You tryna shoot me down but did a 360 n' it literally was no scope You shoulda gave your soul up to God the last time you prayed Call me the master n' yourself a game cuz you just been played!
Truth_Seeker vs. GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

Yeah just tell the world that lie about my gene expression.But then I'll exaggerate the lengths of your m@sturb@tion sessions!Put me on birth control? No need. I've got a big-@ss c*ndom.As for your rap speed, is that cause of your mouth? Cause it's a well run chatter kingdom.And are you calling ME a woman when you feel your manliest playing CoD?When I'm done, people will laugh at you like they're playing a celebrity mod! (1)*rings racism bell* (2)If I were you I would go back to the south And until I grew some horns, shut that bull’s @$$hole you call a mouth (1) Celebrity mod - a game mod where you can take the faces of celebrities you don't like and put them on enemies. (2) racism bell - a bell you ring when you're about to say something that is or might sound racist.
Truth_Seeker vs. GamrDeb8rBbrH8r

Look at this dyke thinkin' he's a gay wad Claimin' to be rapper when he's a fraud At least i have balls, now lets talk about your vagina Which you had acupuncture' d at your stay in red china Shall i tell the world about your gene expression? The leading question? How the heck you thought you could cook especially with a yeast infection? I can rap faster than someone blowing all the way into your air hole Call me the life patrol cuz my killer raps make sure your on birth control You took a crapload in all three holes at the same time in one night I would diss you more kid but for now, we're not even at the same height
The Plethora Virgin 3

I will provide a list of topics, choose one, you're CON, I'm PRO. Then in R2 I go and post. Note, I am playing Devil's advocate in some places. 1. Most nonhuman Animal's do not deserve rights. 2. Utilitarianism is superior to Kantianism. 3. Sarah Palin is not as incompetent as she is made out to be. 4. Cannibalism of dead people should be socially acceptable, if not encouraged. 5. Agriculture was a mistake. 6. Anarchy could feasibly work. 7. Functionalism is a flawed theory of mind. 8. The Turing test is fundamentally inaccurate. 9. John McCain will win the 2008 Presidential Election. 10. In all likelihood, we live in a virtual world. 11. In Soviet Russia, car drives YOU! (This is a joke, just in case you're an idiot). 12. Moral Luck is fundamentally flawed. 13. Resolved: That it is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save more innocent people. (LD Debate). 14. Man is not the main cause of global warming today.
omniscient

Satan “who brings evil and temptation, and is known as the deceiver who leads humanity astray” [1] Seen by some as a separate entity, an opposite of god. Or the symbolic yin and yang of contrary forces, a concept that neither good nor evil can exist alone. In the Book, in the story of Job, Satan is shamed by defeat; an omnipotent being cannot be defeated. Satan is also known as the devil, not fear. No one has “fear” of a god and its benevolence. You allude to be the fallen angle, Beelzebub, not a god at all. Others believe Satan resides within man as the evil within, the anti-conscience, again not a god, but man himself. You words cannot be seen. Does a collection of visual alphabets spew from your mouth upon your utterances? What colors are they? Believe me, you are not an omniscient god. If you were you would have foretold your loss of this debate and curtailed its initiation. 1.https://en.wikipedia.org...
omniscient

Your “darker self” akin to a fallen angel cast into the pit of hell is not god, but sinner. An omnipotent being is devoid of such fault. Are you now a fallen angel? “Before” when?-since it is of an earlier time that I have yet to experience, therefore never to have occurred. By which “stand” in meaning? I have taken mine and have defined. I have no “regret” for negating your purported words and invalidating your claim as god. “Light” is the weight of your words and threats. I have “presence” of mind which you most certainly lack. “Soft” like the kitten’s fur I pet or the down pillow that I rest my head; amenities I can supply myself without forfeit or loss of debate. “One” is a number of a single item or digit. A digit, also a phalange which second member flies in your direction with vigor. Gases make water and trees rise from seeds. Your incompetence of thought and process is further proof of your fallibility, against a defined all knowing and perfection of an omnipotent being. Your sir, have not a “spark” of decency in claiming yourself as god. You may sit at the stern of a bowless boat while I will sing the boat’s praises as it makes its way down into Poseidon’ s realm. His wrathful welcome of a false god will be assuredly sweet upon my lips. click="document.location='/Peepette/photos/album/5789/39432/'" src="../../../photos/albums/1/6/5789/314901-5789-nzfbf-a.jpg" alt="" /> No “baby Jesus” ever walked on clouds, as a child was earth bound as the book tells. Your illiteracy on the one named furthers your lack of omniscient qualities.
omniscient

Since it is only science and mathematics that can determine factual truth, all other definitions for truth are metaphysical. Truth has been pondered on for thousands by numerous philosophers; it has yet to obtain a definitive resolution. Since your “word,” cannot be proven to be true; your existence as god is nullified as result. You are akin to the fallacies of the past and present; a Santa Clause or Tooth Fairy. Your word is no more true than the Ho, ho, ho of St Nick or found money attributed as a miracle by a pixie like creature. Because your “word” cannot be proven to be true, what you “say” by word cannot be proven as truth. My bow and its quivers are my own, not to be given to you. The bow of my viola will cease to make music, if relinquished to you. My decorating adeptness would be substandard without my bows. A boat will not float minus a bow. The stand of trees on the edge of my vista will remain. I will be seated in a stand of court to bear witness against you as false. My stand on this issue will not be moved, neither will my deer stand. It stands to reason you are not god and your word has no truth. But also, you claim to be god, but have no command of the English language, its rules of punctuation and capitalization. For those rules are true unlike your word. No omniscience can be attributed to you since truth and you are null.
Movie age limits should be more strict

I would disagree with the argument here. In the real world nowadays, kids are going to be exposed to all sorts of disturbing imagery inevitably, and to shield them from that almost hurts them more than for them to see it. I know someone who in high school, met another kid who had been to a Catholic school from grades K-8. When the kid went to a public school, he heard "foul" language and swearing that he had not been exposed to. This can cause bullying and such. Point being, shielding kids from disturbing language and imagery hurts the kid more than it helps them.
Seat belt and helmet laws should be abolished.

I notice that my opponent is from Nevada. http://www.bhsi.org... In Nevada, there are no bicycle helmet laws in most counties, and for the few counties that do, the restriction is only for those under 17. I am going to argue that seatbelt and helmet laws should not be abolished, but instead, should be restricted to those under the age of responsibility, whatever that may be. Kids generally aren't old enough to make responsible decisions. One accident without wearing a seatbelt or a helmet could kill a kid, or put him in extreme pain and injury that could negatively impact the rest of his life. This especially applies to toddlers. They can barely buckle their own seatbelts. If parents aren't required to make sure that the child has a seatbelt, that's like signing their death warrant. Putting a kid in the seat of a moving car without a seatbelt is too much risk. They could very easily die an easily preventable death. Why risk it? Now, to directly address my opponent's arguments directly. "Just because people aren't forced to wear seat belts or motorcycle helmets doesn't mean that you can't wear a seat belt or helmet." A kid probably wouldn't even notice the seatbelt. "If the risks that go along with not using a seat belt or helmet concerns you then wear a seat belt whenever you are in a car, wear a helmet whenever you are on a motorcycle, and let other people make up their own minds." A kid isn't even fully aware of the risks. "People should be allowed to take as many risks as they want with their own safety." What if they aren't even properly aware of the risks? "People should be allowed to do whatever they want with their own person and property, as long as they don't physically harm the person or property of a non consenting other." In that case, a parent should be required to make sure that their child is wearing a seatbelt, or else that child is quite likely to be harmed. "Therefore, people should be allowed to not wear a seat belt or motorcycle helmet because the only person it puts in danger is the person making the decision." This would mean that parents would decide whether or not their children wear seatbelts, so that contradicts itself. In conclusion, seatbelt and helmet laws should remain, at least for little kids.
Seat belt and helmet laws should be abolished.

Just because people aren't forced to wear seat belts or motorcycle helmets doesn't mean that you can't wear a seat belt or helmet. If the risks that go along with not using a seat belt or helmet concerns you then wear a seat belt whenever you are in a car, wear a helmet whenever you are on a motorcycle, and let other people make up their own minds. Oliver Wendell Holmes said it best when he said "My right to swing my fist ends where your nose begins." People should be allowed to take as many risks as they want with their own safety. People should be allowed to do whatever they want with their own person and property, as long as they don't physically harm the person or property of a non consenting other. Therefore, people should be allowed to not wear a seat belt or motorcycle helmet because the only person it puts in danger is the person making the decision.
Murder Is A Good Thing

A definitive statement like "Murder is a good thing," means that you promote ALL murder. You have gone as far as to say that if a person is killed by defending himself from attackers, it's his fault. In the means of self-defense, however, I understand and do not condemn the act of hurting or killing someone to protect oneself or someone else.You fail to recognize the emotional hardship loved ones of the deceased people will have after the person is murdered. In fact, people are more likely to feel a sense of unease when hearing "Your loved one was murdered," rather than saying "Your loved one passed away peacefully." Additionally, promoting murder is like saying you promote all of the lost lives of policemen and militants that risk their lives to save their friends and to protect their home.
Murder Is A Good Thing

Murder is a good thing if you just let it happen If someone wants to kill you protectively, Then if you just let it happen no one else will be hurt. If you fight the murder, then its not the killer's fault, it's your fault. If you DO NOT fight it, then it IS NOT against humanity. It's actually for humanity because if we prevent murder then there is the problem of overproduction of people. We won't go extinct, we're the farthest from it. In fact, we have over 7 billion people in the world. So, it is a good thing if you just let it happen. "Why do you think its against humanity? When if a tree dies, others will grow Tell them Tell them Ahh Murder is a good thing Its not against humanity Tell them to stop punishing against humanity If you just let it happen Its actually for humanity Never fight it or else You've just killed yourself Just be a good kid for me Oh, murder is a good thing I'm glad you listened to me Or if you didn't You'll be so confused If your mother seems to say That its against humanity Your mother should be ashamed Please tell her That murder is a good thing If you just let it happen" Murder Is A Good Thing - Dwayne Johnson Lyric Sources: http://lyrics-tweet.com... www.lyricsera.com/1320748-lyrics-murder-is-a-good-thing.html www.metrolyrics.com/murder-is-a-good-thing-lyrics-dwayne-johnson.html www.lyricsfreak.com/.../dwayne+johnson/murder+is+a+good+thing_ 21112335.html www.lyricsmode.com/lyrics/.../dwayne_johnson/murder_is_a_good_thing.htmlR06 azlyrics.biz/dwayne-johnson-murder-is-a-good-thing-lyrics/ lyrics.com.ua/...lyrics/dwayne-johnson-murder-is-a-good-thing-lyrics/R06 www.snapeaz.net/.../lyrics/818-dwayne-johnson-murder-is-a-good-thing- lyricsR06 https://tekstovi-pesama.com... https://azlyrics.com.az... "we have over 7 billion people in the world" source: http://www.census.gov...
Bsh1 vs. Bailey: Hot Guys Battle

Name: Cole Monahan http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... http://www.debate.org... Thanks again to bsh1 for a great, hot debate! I had a lot of fun. :)
Bsh1 vs. Bailey: Hot Guys Battle

Thanks to Bailey for a great debate. It's been fun to bring some sexy back to the DDO debate section ;) Now, for my last submission here!Name: Adi GillespieAge: 27Height: 5'10"Weight: 185 lbs And, again, here are the links to the images:http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...This has been a fantastic debate, and I've enjoyed myself immensely. I don't normally have so much fun doing research for a DDO "argument." Thank you for reading this debate, and I am excited for your feedback!
Bsh1 vs. Bailey: Hot Guys Battle

Name: Max WyattAge: 20 And, as always, the links to the photos on DDO:http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...
Bsh1 vs. Bailey: Hot Guys Battle

Name: Jon Kortajarenahttp://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...
Bsh1 vs. Bailey: Hot Guys Battle

Name: Dan OsborneAge: 26Height: 6'3"Weight: 202 lbs. And, as before, here are the links to the photos in the event that DDO decides to be annoying again:http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...
Bsh1 vs. Bailey: Hot Guys Battle

Alrighty, let's get this started! Thanks again to bsh for starting the debate! Name: Djibril Didier Zongahttp://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...
Bsh1 vs. Bailey: Hot Guys Battle

Thank you again to Bailey for the debate. And, without further ado, let's begin!Name: Andrea MosconAge: 24Height: 6'0"Weight: 154 lbs s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://i.pinimg.com...; alt="" />. s://78.media.tumblr.com...; alt="" />I have also posted links to my images below in the event that my C/P'd images don't display properly:http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...http://www.debate.org...Thanks again to Bailey for the debate and to Andrea for being Adonis reborn. Tossing it over to you now, Bailey!
Porsche 918 is better than Mclaren P1

IntroductionTo start off I would point out that this debate should be based off of performance and rarity since these are both supercars we are talking about. By rarity I mean the number of units produced. So, the car with less models produced is the more appealing car. Therefore, my opponent's argument on how the Porsche is achievment because of the functional interior isn't important in this debate. Now I would like to give some specs:ArgumentsPerformanceAcceleration 0-60 mph Mclaren P1: 2.6 sec Porsche 918 Spyder: 2.2 sec 0-100 mph Mclaren P1: 4.7 sec Porsche 918 Spyder: 4.9 sec 0-150 mph Mclaren P1: 9.9 sec Porsche 918 Spyder: 10.5 sec 0-180 mph Mclaren P1: 15.74 Porsche 918 Spyder: 17.5 We can interpret that although the Porsche 918 Spyder is superior to the Mclaren P1 in it's 0-60 acceleration time, the Mclaren P1 is vastly superior in the 0-100, 0-150, and 0-180 mph categories. Also, supercars are supposed to be driven fast when on the track, so 0-100, 0-150, and 0-180 acceleration times matter more than 0-60 acceleration times. Therefore, the Mclaren P1 wins in this category. . http://fastestlaps.com...Winner: Mclaren P1Top SpeedMclaren P1: 217 mphPorsche 918 Spyder: 211 mphClearly, the winner is the Mclaren. . http://www.carmagazine.co.uk...http://www.carmagazine.co.uk...Winner: Mclaren P1RarityMclaren P1: 375 UnitsPorsche 918 Spyder: 918 UnitsAs shown the Mclaren P1 is the more appealing car because it is less common. In the world of supercars, having a rarer model is better. Because of this, the Mclaren P1 wins again. . http://www.carmagazine.co.uk...Winner: Mclaren P1ConclusionSince the Mclaren P1 has clearly won in all of these categories, it is clearly the better car.
Do You Agree With Toby Keith's Recent Announcement

I don't agree with the resolution. Terror groups like ISIS still exist and are still murdering Christians in the Middle East. ( . http://www.newsweek.com...) Heck there was a terror attack in Pakistan yesterday showing that it's still here and it's spreading. (. http://qz.com...) 8 hours ago Obama stated that Iran sponsered terrorism. How could they if terrorism is dead? (. http://nypost.com...) Terrorist organization, Al-Qaeda, is still alive and kicking as they are fighting in Yemen. (. http://www.foxnews.com...)I have shown that terrorism is still occuring in todays world and that we cannot ignore it.
Taekwondo is Not a Martial Art

I would like to apologize from the get go; I should have either made this debate longer or put my opening arguments in R1. Oh well, its all a learning experience, right? The word martial is defined as “relating to, or suited for war” [1]. Therefore, in order to be considered a martial art, Taekwondo has to employ techniques that are useful in combat and/or self-defense. Now I don’t deny that Taekwondo pays lip service to such techniques, but as I will presently show, the foundations of modern Taekwondo are not martial techniques. The two things that modern Taekwondo is known for are Olympic Style Sparring, and high, acrobatic kicking. Sparring is the cornerstone of martial arts training [2]. However, modern Taekwondo sparring divorces itself from most useful martial techniques. The only techniques allowed are punches to the chest, and kicks to the chest guard and face. No open hand techniques, no punches to the face, no grabs, no takedowns, no throws [3]. These prohibited techniques are exactly the kind of thing that one would need in order to become a proficient fighter, and Taekwondo not only doesn’t promote them, it outlaws them. The other point I will address is the other aspect of Taekwondo that the sport is known for: high kicking. [4]. It is necessary to warm up the large muscles used in such kicks, or one risks injury [5], which would certainly damage your chances in a fight. On the street, there is no time for such warm ups [6], so performing them would be suicide. High kicking may be pretty, but it isn’t martial technique. I have shown that the core aspects of modern Taekwondo, Olympic Sparring and acrobatic kicking, are not martial techniques. Therefore, Taekwondo is not a martial art. [1] . http://www.merriam-webster.com... [2] . http://www.martialartssparring.org... [3] . http://www.taekwondo-information.org... [4] . http://en.wikipedia.org... [5] . http://www.thekickerscorner.com... [6] . http://news.menshealth.com...
High heels should be illegal and destroyed as well as halting production of high heels.

Here's why: they serve no purpose other than making men and women look ridiculous as whenever they walk in high heels, they appeared to be squeezing their butt cheeks to prevent body waste from exiting. Or need to use bathroom badly. Why people would wear those silly 'footwear'? To look stylish? To appear as confident? To have good posture? There are many different ways to achieve any of them without suffering back pain, foot pain, leg pain, and difficulty in walking.