BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Battle of the Best Rappers

Donald Trump representing Americans is so embarrassing. This guy doesn't have any comparisons to legends like Benjamin or Thomas Edison! And after his term is done, he will be jumped by Mexicans and then he'll be turned into a skeleton mean a dead president. And just like the other presidents, he is the opposite of genuine along with his former nemesis. Yeah, Hillary is a b!tch. And I hope that b!tch jump off a bridge or ended up in Jeffrey Dahmer's fridge. Or hanged herself on Twitch. Or get a whole lot of stitches after being thrown into ditches. You surprised that I hate that b!tch too?! She's just as terrible as the leader of the Zulu Nation. Now let's talk about the creation of The Clinton Foundation and about their phony donations. And I hope the Haitians destroyed the Clintons' reputation. They deserve the condemnation. Fvck Donald and Obama's laws of deportation. The Clintons never wanted blacks to have probation or compensation for decades of being forced to work on the plantations. I am against the dictating of televisions and radio stations or the history of racial discrimination. And one day, I hope there will be a legalization of prostitution and marijuana. Like if you hate Madonna or a fake fan of Nirvana. Like if you hate Anaconda or Barack Obama. Like if you listened to The Chronic in the state of California. Or maybe, you're in the state of Georgia listening to music on Pandora. Or like me you have a Fedora or like Garfield you like eating lasagna.
Battle of the Best Rappers

dude nice job about the feminism but whatever let's get this started reading yo bars i m like WHATT? To be honest yo forehead look like a butt you say I will be extinct like a mammoth shut up boi u not even savage ok let start with donald trump hes so orange he looks like a toxic waste dump he has so many wives for the money that the only reason they call him "honey". with so many wives he such a whore he can only beat me in a race to the tanning store with his fingers so small, i wonder how he gonna build a wall deporting mexicans, his ego so big hes taking illegal medicine
Battle of the Best Rappers

Well, look who accepted the challenge against the bar savage! The guy with the obvious disadvantage. The guy who's about to vanish like extinct Mammoths and get destroyed like ravaged salmon. When it comes to rapping I got that great ability and capability, a whole lot of agility, don't see the point of bigamy, and my favorite region is Sicily, Italy. I have no sympathy for stupidity and I seem to function differently. I don't care about big money or the automobile industry. I'm against this feminist society! Now listen. Feminism was never about gender equality. These feminists never cared about minority women for a minute. My opinion? Their mission is to put all men in financial prison. These feminists want men to be given longer sentences and women shorter sentences. These feminists want to silence the opposition and are winning the competition by brainwashing politicians and well known musicians. In the world of a feminist is masculine malnutrition, freedom of speech and pornography forbidden along with prostitution. And the true intentions of these SJWs and feminists manages to be well hidden and with barely no mainstream recognition. FVCK CNN!!! Brainwashing the millions with their biased opinions. As far as I'm concerned, the mainstream media are the REAL villains! There's something I got to admit. My personality is not the most handsome. There's no chances of me ever buying a mansion. I'll never buy a random album by Fathom or that poseur punk band Rancid. Or ever be caught singing the national anthem of the Nazis. Debate rapping is my hobby. My bars will turn you into a lifeless zombie who will be added to my pile of bodies of dead commies and corrupt lobbyists. I wouldn't be surprised if your bars were more worser than the Insane Clown Posse. My bars are giving you a feeling of jealousy and I can see that you'll be failing helplessly. I bet you like your words to be clarity which is the opposite of your online identity. You'll never beat me successfully! I predict your "bars" to be bestially. Without reason or intelligence. The opposite of an elephant's brain and the opposite of excellence. Full of unoriginal and dreadful messages. You're the type of person who'll believe in religious Genesis with no direct evidence.
Battle of the Best Rappers

The Rules: 1. Anyone can challenge me. 2. Both of the rappers will be given the maximum of five rounds, 72 hours (3 days) to respond, and 10,000 characters. 3. DO NOT COPY AND PASTE OR PLAGIARIZE!!! And if you have to copy and paste or plagiarize from somebody else then don't even bother trying to battle me in the first place! 4. After the battle has ended, there will be a select winner and anybody can openly vote on who's the better rapper. Open voting will only last for 6 months. 5. I will let the challenger rap first.
American Representative Democracy: illusion or reality

(Sorry I accidentally posted this in the comment section) I can see this is a useless gesture trying to argue this very complicated point with someone who clearly is endeavoring only to annoy, or simply has no ability to refute even a simple argument. Moreover, I would like to point out that my lack of concern for punctuation and spell check results from my conversational style of debate and my assumption that people know what im saying regardless of proper grammar. Perhaps this basic skill is outside the realm of some people here on this website. The last few debates I had concluded with no problem. Furthermore, your over emphasis on my poor concern for punctuation further supports my point that you refuse and/or are unable to refute my argument or any other argument presented in debates in this forum. To that end I might as well resort to your tactics. I'm right, your wrong and you are terrible at debate. I think anyone who reads this will think likewise. I hope to have this debate with someone who will take it seriously in the future. Due to your lack of contribution thus far I ask that you please leave the rest of us who actually enjoy debate to ourselves on this website. thank you.
American Representative Democracy: illusion or reality

As you can see from my user name I do not doubt that America is the greatest country in the world. If we want to keep it that way we can't bathe in complacency and pretend that our system is infallible. While I agree it is the best system on the planet that doesn't mean that it can't or shouldn't be improved upon. If we sat back and drooled over our strong military after we won world war two instead of constatnly working to improve and upgrade it, we would be sitting on a bunch of useless military hardware and wondering how the rest of the world surpassed us. Change is needed to keep America the greatest nation on earth. I have identified a few areas of our government that need to be changed, you can't logicaly refute them by simply professing america's greatness. That isn't how debate works. I invite you to refute my points in any way you choose that is compliant with the rules of logic. Thank you
The US should continue using the Federal System

s://lh6.googleusercontent.com...; alt="" width="440px;" height="225px;" /> ("Map of unitary and federal states" by Lokal_Profil. Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.5 via Wikimedia Commons) That map shows Federations in green and Unitary States in blue. So quick definitions taken from Google so that way my respectable opponent knows what they are arguing about. I am arguing in favor of the United States of America staying a federation (a state operating under a federal system0 which is defined in the following way: a group of states with a central government but independence in internal affairs I will be arguing against of the United States of America becoming a Unitary State defined as: a sovereign state governed as a single entity. The central government is supreme, and the administrative divisions exercise only powers that the central government has delegated to them. I will note that that definition of unitary state makes it sound like the USA would be one, however the 10th amendment of the US Constitution is what makes us a true federation. So the question is as follows: should we stay a federation? My answer is absolutely! In this round I will be elaborating on the points I will bring up in the rest of this debate for why we should keep the federal system. We established a Federal system because the UK (which is a unitary state) had been very tyrannical when governing the first 13 colonies. We realised that this system would not work so that it why we established a federation. Yes the Articles of Confederation were flawed and almost had too much federalism in them, but we adapted and we have made one of the best federations on Earth. No our government isn't perfect, but our system for governing is. Federal States are some of the most successful countries in the world; take Germany as an example. Germany has one of the largest and most stable economies in the world today (4th in the world). And Germany is not alone, the US is the largest economy in the world, Brazil is 7th in the world , Russia is 9th and India is 10th. Switzerland is ahead of the US in GDP per capita (9th) Switzerland also has a stable, high tech economy. All of that goes to show how successful federations are in the world. Most Unitary States were former empires. Im not saying that empires are bad or anything but I will say that empires were corrupt and very tyrannical. However most federations are much less corrupt due to the much more widespread distribution of power.
The US should continue using the Federal System

Federalism by definition is a political concept in which a group of members are bound together by covenant with a governing representative head. Federalism is a system based upon democratic rules and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and provincial/state governments, creating what is often called a federation.if we look at the Federalism in the United States we can barley see that this is the evolving relationship between state governments and the federal government of the United States. American government has evolved from a system of dual federalism to one of associative federalism. In "Federalist No. 46," James Madison asserted that the states and national government "are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers." Alexander Hamilton, writing in "Federalist No. 28," suggested that both levels of government would exercise authority to the citizens' benefit: "If their [the peoples'] rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress Because the states were preexisting political entities, the U.S. Constitution did not need to define or explain federalism in any one section but it often mentions the rights and responsibilities of state governments and state officials in relation to the federal government. if we look at the structure of the federal system composed of : bank presidents, boards of directors, advisory councils and functions , we can see that the american people , which we find at the down deep of the structure ,that are barley not satisfied with such a system that is generating a huge economical crisis . now lets take a look on the shared powers delegated to the national government and others reserved to the state , and we find out that they are sharing these privileges that i'am going to mention briefly , standing on a basic structure : provide for public welfare,administer criminal justice,charter banks ,raising taxes and borrowing money. as we see , the common interactions are not enough to assure us a static economy ( because a state only runs on economical structure) so that i think that we should create a system that shares all the powers of the national government and the states , like creating federal courts , declaring wars ,admitting new states etc ... so i'am against this Federal system because it does not evolve currency care .
Internet censorship

Hello 9alpha,First of all, a search engines are hosted on these things called websites. Websites contain web pages, which are hosted on a server somewhere in the planet. So if you are searching on Google, you are accessing Google's web pages, and since it is in their possession, they have the right to modify and filter what is displayed on their web pages, just like you said earlier. Google is not the government, or related.Second of all, illegal things should be removed as they violate these things called federal laws. Laws were made to protect citizens. If you were a parent, would you like your child to see these things?Third of all, my opponent cannot spell correctly or use proper grammar.1. there -> their2. united states -> United States3. edited -> edit4. there -> their5. there -> their6. p******ophy -> p******aphy7. eight -> right8. unceancered -> uncensored9. Internet -> internet10. belive -> believeI apologize for my attitude as this is my first debate.
Internet censorship

When ever there is new technology, society tries to figure out how it fits in to there rules of the past, sometimes they don't change any laws, and sometimes they do, but when it comes to Internet in the united states, all the same rules and rights that we have as citizens still apply. One thing I want to make clear is that individual websites have the right to edited and censor there own page if they want to, but people should have the right to look through unfiltered search results on the internet, to insure they are getting both opinions on all of there information. Although there are some awful things like child pornogrophy and drug dealing on the internet, that don't give the government or companies to decide what we see and what we don't see. The eight to a unceancered Internet is what I belive to be a civil liberty and the reasons behind having one grow more important each day. I look for word to debating with whover my opponent is.
Debate.org should have its own currency to help Juggle make money

I see my opponent want's to get that extra 1000 characters, cause he writes a hell of a lot. LoLtention #1: The name. Bench's. So when you log in, it says CLICK HERE TO BUY BENCH'S. Now what if some poor noob gets on for the first time and thinks that he is buying benches for homeless people to sleep on? I, for one, would not like the idea of my money being spent like that. LoLtention #2: Ways to earn bench's (Why is their an apostrophe there lol?): 1. I see a problem with this. With the amount of debates in the voting period, you could get mass amounts of bench's in almost no time. 2. How about the misc spamming forums? I can easily sit at my computer hitting Ctr-v and clicking over and over to gain bench's. 3 & 4. Spam debates and useless arguments. 6. Same as 2. =========================================================================== Refuting arguments for Bench's =========================================================================== 1. I am sorry, i do not want to see Imabench's green balls, and stuff like this:http://www.flickr.com... (Ignore the satanic stuff). If this kind of stuff were allowed on DDO, it would soon have ads for "A bigger present." It would also send all the llamas, who cant comprehend sex, on a killing frenzy. 2. "go ahead and turn that 8000 into 9000 to make your point and possibly win the debate." What if you are debating a newbie to the site, and he hasn't earned the bench's yet? 3. So you can vote for yourself? This would be highly unbalancing in terms of how many wins people that accept a lot of debates get compared to people who don't wanna debate, because people have votes stocked out the wazoo. WE ARE THE 99 PERCENT!!11!!!!!!11!!!11!!!!!1ELEVEN 4. If you picked a name, you should roll with it dawg. "for a small nominal fee one person can buy Bench's by paying actual money to Juggle in exchange for them. " WHAT THE HELL. Who would ever think that buying power for money is a good thing? What if im a hobo who lives as one with the pangolins in Hoboland, and can only afford to keep my internet access running? I would be at an immense disadvantage. Look, someone just spent a Sextillion dollars to get votes. It would snowball out of effect. ========================================================================== What i propose. ========================================================================== I propose a system called Burritopoints. This is not a currency, it is simply a way of tracking how much a user is contributing. 1 Debate WIN= 1 BP. 1 Debate loss= -1 BP. This ensures that spammers don't work their way up the list. At the end of the month, the user with the most points is allowed to ask for one person to be, as you called it, a "prostitute". If the prostitute posts nudes, next month they get a bonus of 5 BP. At the end of the year, the top winner with the most amount of BP gets their favorite quote engraved in the background of DDO forever.
Debate.org should have its own currency to help Juggle make money

Ok here is how people can earn "Bench's" 1) 100 Bench's for voting on a debate 2) 1 Bench for every forum post 3) 10 Bench's for starting a new debate 4) 10 Bench's for posting an argument to a debate 5) 5 Bench's for accepting an open debate 6) 1 Bench for updating your stance on the Big Issues or your profile information Basically the stuff you do all the time is how you make money on DDO, but There is a variety of thins you can do with this money on DDO, 1) Legalized Prostitution. I got your attention now huh? Yes with DDO having its own currency members will be allowed to transfer money to other members for whatever reason. And on DDO since there is always a high demand for people to post pics of themselves, you can guarantee that with a DDO currency that legalized prostitution will become a reality! 2) Put extra character space in arguments, 1000 characters for 1000 Bench's You accept a debate a little fast, your opponent made a character limit of 500 characters which is bull sh*t. You though have the funds to still make the debate intellectual and give substantial arguments. Maybe though you find yourself in a heavy weight battle and you need all the characters you can get, go ahead and turn that 8000 into 9000 to make your point and possibly win the debate. 3) Buy extra votes in debates? That will cost 5000 but it could help you How many times have you noob sniped someone or roasted a troll in a debate only to have nobody vote on it in time and it ends in a tie? well for 5,000 bench's you can go ahead and give yourself the well deserved win. 4) CHANGE YOUR NAME FOR 10,000 We all have thought about changing our name at one point am I right? well the greatest prize you can get with a DDO currency is being able to change your name to the name you really want without having to start everything over and having to refriend anyone. Lets say though that someone has the name you want, and they are some old account that hasnt been online in two years and hasnt debated more than 3 times. Well for 15,000 you can go ahead and buy that name out and make it your name! Now how does Juggle make money off of this? Well some people are really impatient or might really be in a squeeze where they want a vote or two or extra argument space. Well for a small nominal fee one person can buy Bench's by paying actual money to Juggle in exchange for them. This makes DDO instantly more profitable for Juggle and could really arouse their interest in the website since money is rolling in automatically. Those are the reasons why DDO should have its own currency
Debate.org should have its own currency to help Juggle make money

Hello, My name is Imabench, AND THIS IS YOUR WEEKLY IMABENCH TROLL DEBATE :DThis week's topic, Debate. org should implement its own currency for everyone to be able to use, acquire, spend on a variety of services that DDO has to offer. Such currency would be earned by doing things that people regularly do on DDO already, meaning that anyone could easily start earning it. This currency could also be spent on a variety of things that DDOers could appreciate (which will be elaborated on later). This helps Juggle though because members who want a lot of DDO currency and fast can pay actual money for DDO currency, and that payment would go directly to Juggle. It would be just like how you buy credits on games on Facebook, here on DDOThere are 3 parameters for this debate. 1) The DDO Currency will be in units called "Benches" 2) In this scenario Juggle is actually involved in this site (but on a limited scale)3) Whoever accepts this debate believes that Ron Paul should give up, forever.
Christ Jesus (Peace on Him) did not teach the concept of trinity

I thank baggins for his willingness to debate this topic, and thett3 for setting up this glorious tournament. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church (Paragraph 841) says of the Muslims: 'The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day." (330)' I feel that baggins has said pretty much everything that needs to be said, so I accept and wish him good luck, hoping this debate will be interesting and productive.