God is a logical concept

Thanks to my opponent for the debate, please realize what follows is not a personal attack. However, I am at a loss how to explain why I reject your hypothesis. My opponent either refuses to accept the logic that I have presented, or I have used to difficult examples. So lets try one more time in this round to show why my opponents entire argument is false. This is how something comes from nothing. 1) Nothing is defined as the quantum vacuum, or the zero energy state. That means that is nothing. So at this point we are observing no particles, or to put it differently we are observing nothing. So thats step 1. 2) The we observe these particles pop into existence, this means we are observing something. This is us no longer observing nothing. So thats step 2. So we have nothing, and then something arises. So, something comes from nothing. So when Pro points out that this is not nothing, Pro has yet to provide an alternative that is tried and tested. I fact we are just given bold assertions to take Pro on faith. I am sorry to say Pro logical concepts don't rely on faith only, they require truth. You have not shown there to be any truth to your nothing assertions. Your argument is defeated. Its defeated by pure reasoning, and while you may not see my point, I am hoping that the voters can follow the simple logic I pointed out in previous rounds and again here. Truth be told, these concepts are not easy concepts to grasp and I have honestly tried my best to present them in the simplest form possible. If I have failed to explain these concepts in simple English, please let me know so I can try refine this for future debates. However, I would ask that you don't vote against these truths if you feel you don't understand them. Now a few other points and fallacies that I feel I should point out. Einsteins theory of gravitation which my opponent claims defeats my argument has nothing to do with the origins of the universe. It has to do with gravitation. As such, please do not buy into my opponents false pleading when they say “The site Con gave proof that science cannot explain the origin of this universe and the way everything came to be! This is fascinating and amazing, because the only alternative for the creation of this universe, is a legit Creator, a. k. a. God. ” My opponent states “Of course, atheists have to have some sort of explanation for our existence, so they create the Big Bang concept and, controversially, the evolution hypothesis. ” The concept of Big Bang was not created by atheists, it is a well established scientific theory. To say atheists created the Big Bang to discredit theism sounds like loony tunes. Additionally, evolution is not a controversial hypothesis it is a very widely accepted scientific theory so much so that it is considered a scientific fact by many. My opponent also quotes John Lennox, may I say here just as I said for Stephen Hawkings, I do not care what he said. I want to see the logic, I want to see the science, I don't want appeals to authority. Lastly, pro goes on a bit of a rant. “Con says: "As such why do I need to answer these questions when your argument to get to these questions is flawed. In fact I think these questions could make some good debate questions. " Why are you debating this if you won't accept the truth? The truth is that there are other world views from yours. The truth is that NOT ALL science proves your world view. The truth is that you do not know why, where, how, when, what or who started the universe, and you do know that your view on it doesn't make sense. The questions of the universe are the 4 or 5Ws, and the answers always have "GOD" results. See link [6] and try to disprove Creationism. ” Yes, there are differing world views. But not every world view is correct. You said God is a logical concept and as such you need to prove it. Lastly if I may be so bold to ask, Why do I need to disprove creationism? It has never been proven in the first place and this is what you call shifting the burden of proof when you ask me to disprove something. Now I hand this debate over to my voters. I ask that they hold in mind what the resolution of this debate is. My opponent said they would show that God is a logical concept.