Staring at A Woman's Assets is a Form of a Compliment

Let me first start off by pointing out that PRO made no points to prove his case, that Staring at a Woman's Assets is a form of compliment. In the first round, he stated his stance, but did not argue to back that up. He merely refuted my arguments, but however well his refutations were, it is not sufficient enough to allow him to win the round.Next, let me show you that PRO is changing the resolution of the debate. As the title of this debate clearly shows, the resolution is: Resolved: Staring at a woman's assets is a form of compliment. PRO tries to twist this into: Resolved: Staring at a woman's assets should be taken as a compliment. These are clearly not the same, and the first resolution should be taken because that is clearly definied in the title.As I described, PRO still has not fulfilled his burden of proof. He has not proven that staring at a woman's assets is a form of a compliment, he tried to prove that women should take staring as a form of compliment but that is not the resolution. The resolution is that staring is a form of compliment, meaning it is taken universally as a form of compliment, meaning that everyone, all women, take staring as a form of compliment, not should take it as a form of compliment. It is like saying "Saying thank you is a form of politeness". It is accepted world wide as a form of politeness, hence the is. If it was not, it should be "Saying thank you should be a form of politeness." It is not my fault PRO wanted to set such a high BOP for himself. He must prove that staring at a woman's assets is accepted world wide as a compliment, because of the "is". With the is, there is no doubt that it is accepted as a compliment. Again, PRO is arguing that it should be a compliment, when the resolution is: it is a compliment.Reconstruction of PointsContention 1a)In accordance to the title of this debate, I clearly proved that some women do not appreciate staring and as a result, do not take it as a compliment. Pro must prove that staring is a compliment not should be taken as a compliment, meaning that it is accepted as a compliment world wide.Hence, I win on this point, as it was dropped by PRO.Contention 1b)PRO argues that my logic is flawed, since Rape violates rights and Staring does not, and as such, rape is not a compliment and staring is. Staring is also a violation of rights as it classifies as sexual harassment. Therefore, your argument is invalid. As staring violates rights, it is not classified as a compliment as you say, and therefore, I win on this point as PRO concedes that staring is not a compliment.Contention 2Again, this resolution is IS, meaning that staring is a form of compliment not staring should be taken as a form of compliment. Therefore, PRO drops this point, and I win on this one as well. ConclusionPRO clearly did not uphold his BOP. 1. He did not make any arguments to support his case.2. He refuted my points based on the resolution of should be taken as compliment, not is a compliment when he made the debate himself. Therefore, he cannot argue that I am setting an impossible BOP for him.In the end, all my points are left standing, and because PRO did not generate any arguments, he has nothing to support his side of the case.As such, I have won this debate.