Evolution occurs

"Evolution doesn't speak to morality." Yes it does, it HAS to, Morality is something that Objectively exists in us, our Reason for living, Evolution is an idea of how we are the way we are now, it claims species evolve into new and better species, so it must explain everything that is apart of the Human species and not the species below, which is Morality, this no one can deny, whether evolution happened or not, it must explain morality, which not only has it not done so, but I proved it would justify an immorality such as rape in round 2, also we can agree that Homosexuality is not Immoral, however under the Darwinian/"macro-evolution" idea, Homosexuality would be Disadvantageous to reproduction and the ability to pass on heritable material (DNA) to subsequent generations. , thus Natural Selection would have made it Nonexistent or would have made it Immoral, one of the two, it exists and is not Immoral, so again evolution, Macro-evolution to be specific cannot be true. Also, otherwise people like richard dawkins wouldn't go to lengths to defend Morality under evolution(For example richard dawkins said in his ridiculous book, "He then turns to the subject of morality, maintaining that we do not need religion to be good. Instead, our morality has a Darwinian explanation: altruistic genes, selected through the process of evolution, give people natural empathy. He asks, "would you commit murder, rape or robbery if you knew that no God existed?" He argues that very few people would answer "yes", undermining the claim that religion is needed to make us behave morally. In support of this view, he surveys the history of morality, arguing that there is a moral Zeitgeist that continually evolves in society, generally progressing toward liberalism. As it progresses, this moral consensus influences how religious leaders interpret their holy writings. Thus, Dawkins states, morality does not originate from the Bible, rather our moral progress informs what part of the Bible Christians accept and what they now dismiss.[23]" SOURCE Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org... "You need to learn the difference between 'sexual selection' and 'natural selection'. You make sound like rape is an easy thing to do, like the female of a species will just let this happen. " What would it be to evolution if a female would let it happen or not, doesn't change the fact that it would chose rape, as rape even with a strong struggle would be more probable than mating, thus natural selection would no matter what choose, sex without consent, which is sad. " What about the fact that in a large number of species the female is larger than the male?" Exactly, this also disproves evolution, had evolution been true, it would adapt to make rape easier and more accessible for the male to commit, again and again evolution cannot be true. " The cost of rape would be high and not preferred. " This takes the assumption that it was by accident that female is larger than male on a large number of species, Natural selection would just adapt and make the male larger. "Females do have the ability to reject matings and will fight off aggressive males." Doesn't change the fact that it would be more probable for rape to cause procreation than mating, natural selection would have chosen, rape, this disproves it. " But, even with that, rape still does happen, does it not? Leaving aside morality because we aren't discussing that. Remember?" Rape happens, and it's immoral, if evolution is true, it would be moral, we wouldn't feel bad about it or find it disgusting. "Changes in DNA do not happen because of death. Changes in DNA happen because the machinery to replicate DNA is error prone and can cause mutations. All of this happens while you are alive, and while the cell is alive." The Process of death is what I speak of, Not IMMEDIATE death, Death takes a Process, Life breaks down and malfunctions, and this causes, Death which is Non-Function or Non-existence, here I use Non-Function. since that's the case and all living things are dying, which you admitted, in Round 3 by saying "Why do we die? No one really knows. There is no good answer to that, and if you are saying evolution doesn't answer why we die, then I'll agree with you somewhat." Since death happens and DNA is subject to it, a Breakdown(Death) can cause a Mutation/Alteration in DNA. The Process of Death happens when you are alive, that's how we die, something happens, Breakdown, this Breakdown is constant, from the minute we are born our cells die. "I never said selection was random, I said the mutation was random." 1, by saying Selection isn't random, what it is? Intentful? because that's the only way things happen, With intent or without, By Accident or on Purpose, Intentionally or Random. 2, I do not contend that a mutation in DNA is random, as I agree death causes Random circumstances, thus when death causes DNA mutation or malfunction, I agree it's random, notice how Evolution is not necessary to explain a random mutation? "I said the selection is not intentional." you contradict yourself, first you said, "I never said selection was random" then say "I said the selection is not intentional."" If something is not intentional, it's random, if something is not random, it's intentional/chosen/selected, it's one or the other. " selection is done because there was something to select for or against." Something needs intent in order to Select, something Random cannot Select, it just happens.