creation v.s evolution

I am not calling you a liar, I am saying you have been misguided by liars. Pro attempts to rebut the video by claiming it’s hoaxed. However, one could easily look at the original video if you don’t believe Potholer54. You will see he’s right. Pro rejects the video by using an ad hominem fallacy. He essentially rejects it because of cui bono. Potholer would benefit and since he’s an atheist, it must be fake. This is logically flawed. Retrograde motion This was dropped by Pro. I win in this section. Morality Pro claims God would never do such a thing. This would imply God is bond to a set of moral laws above him. This means Pro concedes morality is not from God. As where else would perfection come from other than himself? On a side note, the God of the bible has ordered the death of babies in 1 Samuel 15:3. Pro misunderstands what I meant by a guilt by association. I am not stating because he’s a murderer, his words are flawed. I’m saying that he cited a mass murderer in order to demoralize atheism. He tries to link Dahmer to atheism, trying to make it guilty by association. His whole rant with equality is nothing else but an equivocation. When most use equality doesn’t mean all views are equal. He also goes onto say morality can’t exist with evolution, but he dropped my argument from atheistic morality. Meaning, I win in this section Genetics Pro drops my argument from ERVs, I win on this section too. Misc and the moon Pro says “why does your theory eat up tax dollars while the truth is being pushed away” This begs the question, as he is assuming creationism to be true. However, he has yet to demonstrate it. Furthermore, evolution has been demonstrated the superior theory. We wouldn’t want alchemy and astrology taught alongside other subjects, because they are pseudoscience. Like creationism. His argument with the moon is saying since the moon has been moving at a few inches a year, then the moon should be much further than now. Dave E. Matson shows how this is no problem [1]. The tides, chiefly caused by the Moon's gravitational attraction and the orbiting of Earth and Moon about a common point, act as a brake to slow down the earth's rotation. The nearer tidal bulge, which carries the greater effect, runs slightly out of alignment of the Moon overhead; the gravitational interaction between it and the Moon serves to speed up the Moon in its orbit even as it slows down the earth's rotation. As it speeds up, the Moon moves to a higher orbit. The effectiveness of this tidal brake on the earth's rotation strongly depends on the configuration of the oceans. Thus, we should inquire as to whether the current arrangement is an average value or not. The present rate of tidal dissipation is anomalously high because the tidal force is close to a resonance in the response function of the oceans; a more realistic calculation shows that dissipation must have been much smaller in the past and that 4.5 billion years ago the moon was well outside the Roche limit, at a distance of at least thirty-eight earth radii . Thus, our moon was probably never closer than 151,000 miles. A modern astronomy text (Chaisson and McMillan, 1993, p.173) gives an estimate of 250,000 kilometers (155,000 miles), which agrees very closely with Brush's figure. Thus, the "problem" disappears! Pro has dropped most of his arguments like retrograde motion and my genetic argument. None of his arguments had anything to do with evolution. Evolution has been demonstrated the better theory. Thanks. [1] http://www.talkorigins.org...