BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The human brain is biologically designed to bluff.

The information is in the DNA, therefore biological. Do you guys on this site just argue for the sake of it? Because there's not a single time anyone has ever addressed any real issue, just nonsense based on their own lack of comprehension. Biology is structuring and shaping within information inside our DNA. What are you on about? Everyone bluffs, whether they are peaceful and loving, or hateful and annoying - you just have to know what they are bluffing about. Bluffing is inside of us all - we bluff to ourselves and others. Just attack someone who is honest, and watch the bluffing begin.
There is proof for the existence of God

Definitions: God = The creator and ruler of the universe Proof = Evidence or argument establishing a fact or the truth of a statement. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rules: 1. Provide evidence for your arguments (do not make blind assertions). 2. Please refrain from using ad hominem arguments and/or logical fallacies. 3. The first round is for the rules/and Pros opening arguments, the second for rebuttals, and the third for closing statements. The third round is to be used for rebuttals and conclusions only; no new arguments. 4. Do not forfeit. 5. The Burden of Proof is on Pro since the assertion that there is proof for the existence of God is unfalsifiable. 6. Every argument must be structured in a similar fashion to this so that it is easy to point out flaws/defend it: P1: Bob is a bachelor. P2: All bachelors are unmarried men. C1: Bob is an unmarried man.
There is proof for the existence of God

P1. You're expanding either the definition of "established" or of "truth" P2. You dropped the rest of my argument. You'd said "Evidence or argument establishing a fact or the truth of a statement." If we adopt your expanded interpretation of this definition, it would present a practical contradiction. By the Munchausen Trilemma, an arbitrarily long request for evidence and support will inevitably lead to circular logic, an infinite regress, or axioms. If I accept your interpretation, I also cannot prove the interpretation I have just accepted. I will bump up against an axiom or fallacy at some point, and thus you cannot prove at any length that I must accept your intepretation. Nowhere in your original definition did you state "conclusively" or "irrefutably" establish. No fact in law or science meets this criteria. A new observation can always disprove that which has proceeded it. At any minute the invisible giant turtles that many cultures believe hold up the Earth may materialize, thus disproving the current understanding of gravity. You demand that I prove better that God exists than science has that my dog does. Your definition of "established" exceeds that standard used by historians (and we are discussing history) and is therefore useless. If Genghis Khan and Phillip II are considered established persons by people at large, so too may God. So ultimately, rather than a sophomoric dismissal, you should have attempted to deal with my claims. Since you've dropped them, you're now have to stake your entire position on this nescient sophistry else cede the argument. More's the pity; this could have been interesting. But for the sake of argument I accept. You've still conceded, by dropping P2 of C and P2 of C2, not to mention the rest of my argument, that you should think that God exists because the evidence suggests He does. That's good enough for any theologian. Again, to the reader, I understand the motives why someone would be biased against or towards belief in God based on the consequences that decision would have in their life. If the Aztec pantheon being true meant that I would have to commit human sacrifice, else everyone would die because the sun would stand still, I would demand a lot more evidence than the proposition than that there is one more planet in the galaxy than had been thought. I accepted this debate to show that the nonbeliever has no superiority to the believer. Everyone has to choose what axioms they are to accept and I begrudge none that right. Rebuttal: The argument stands. To refute it, you must prove a definition of "established" that precludes proving anything, even itself.
There is proof for the existence of God

Your argument is invalid since the conclusion: “My opponent accepts witnesses as proof of a person`s existence.” does not follow from the premises. “P2. My opponent believes in Genghis Khan et. al. because of the adequacy of the evidence.”The definition of “belief” in this context should be “hold (something) as an opinion; think.”I think that Genghis Khan did exist because that is what the evidence suggests. You are either A: committing an equivocation fallacy [1] by using the word “belief” in another sense: “accept that (something) is true, especially without proof.”I did not claim that it is proven that Genghis Khan did exist, I merely stated that the evidence suggests that he did. Or B: you misunderstood the definition of proof: “Evidence or argument establishing a fact or the truth of a statement.”It is not enough to provide evidence that merely suggests that God does exist. You must present conclusive evidence that proves that God does exist. For your argument to be valid you would have to change its conclusion: P1. The only historical evidence for the existence of a person is ultimately either primary witnesses (they who saw the person), or secondary witnesses (they who heard of him, or saw his effects). P2. My opponent believes in Genghis Khan et. al. because of the adequacy of the evidence. C. My opponent accepts witnesses as evidence that suggests that a person did exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- “P1. The previous conclusion. [“My opponent accepts witnesses as proof of a person`s existence.”]P2. There are far more witnesses of God than there are for Genghis Khan.P3. It is not necessary to believe everything written about God for belief in Him.C2. One who believes in such historical figures is epistemologically inconsistent if he does not accept the rudimentary fact that an immortal anthropomorphic being, possessor of some measure of supernatural powers, who has been seen by many people with varying distance in both time and space one from another in some fairly consistent ways, indeed exists. “ This argument is not sound since P1 is not true. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conclusion:Pro has failed to produce a sound argument that proves that God does exist. Rule 3 states that Pro will not be allowed to produce a new argument in round 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [1]: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com...
There is proof for the existence of God

.. " since he has not presented any arguments for the existence of proof for the existence of God so far. This will prevent me from defending my rebuttal of his argument/s that he will, I assume, present in round 2. The voters should consider this while awarding conduct points. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Did a person such as the following exist as a discrete individual bearing the name and having done the works which make him famous? " Since you have not defined "which works make him famous" I will simply assume a famous work of the person. "1. Socrates, greek philosopher. " I assume that the historical figure Socrates did exist, mainly because of the many historical sources but it is a known problem that Plato used to use his and Socrates" name interchangeably in his dialogues so, I do not know, whether he actually did everything that "made him famous". "2. Phillip II, King of Macedon, father of Alexander and subjugator of Greece. " I also assume that Philip II of Macedon did exist and did defeat Athens and Thebes at the Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BC, again, because of the many historical sources. "3. The apostle Peter (except his supernatural feats)" I assume that the historical person Peter did exist and did lead the church beside Paul because of historical sources. "4. Temujin, also known as Genghis Khan, who conquered nearly a quarter of the world. " I assume that the historical person Genghis Khan did exist and was the founder of the Mongol Empire. Again, because of historical sources. "5. Pythagoras, greek mathematician. " I assume that Pythagoras of Samos was a real historical person and was the first person to prove the Pythagorean theorem as this is what historical evidence suggests.
There is proof for the existence of God

Normally, I don't accept these sorts of theological arguments, but the particular phrasing of this challenge intrigued me. It is impossible to know that nearly anything outside of mathematics, and even it itself, is actually true. We must accept a few axioms, such as the trustworthiness of the senses, and proceed from there. To understand my opponent's axioms, I will ask him for a few examples of his own beliefs and have him very briefly defend his belief in them. I will post no further argument so as to give my opponent space to respond. Did a person such as the following exist as a discrete individual bearing the name and having done the works which make him famous? If so, briefly explain your belief in that person. 1. Socrates, greek philosopher. 2. Phillip II, King of Macedon, father of Alexander and subjugator of Greece. 3. The apostle Peter (except his supernatural feats) 4. Temujin, also known as Genghis Khan, who conquered nearly a quarter of the world. 5. Pythagoras, greek mathematician. Do not worry about providing sources, I will take what facts you use for granted, unless you want to positively assert that any of these did not exist, or did not do those things they are generally famous for, in which case I want sources. Simply explain your belief or prove the non-existence of these commonly accepted historical figures.
JESUS OF THE BIBLE, A PRINCE OF PEACE . (In memory of Akbar Sidi)

I have cited more verses in the Bible where Jesus directly or indirectly approved of murder in the bible, if he is God. However, debate.org count the contents in the verse as profanities. Thus link consists of the actions of what Jesus did (assuming he's God) or what he condoned assuming he's the son of God. http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com.ng...
"Resolved: North Korea poses a more serious threat to United States national security than Iran."

I hope my opponent is up and well, and extend all arguments for the duration.In deviation from the original setup of this debate, I will not be able to defend my original argument, as it was never rebutted.Summarizing the debate so far, my opponent has promised to address several points, only two of which were addressed.The two points he addressed were refuted, and my opponent has one last round to defend those.North Korea stands as the more serious threat, with a fully developed nuclear weapons program and the possible motivation put it to offensive use.I want to thank everybody for reading this, and also remind the audience that this debate is part of an official tournament. This means that votes by members who have not been designated as judges will be ignored for the outcome of this tournament.Finally, thanks to the organizers of this tournament and my mentor whiteflame: so far, this has been tremendous fun!
Should we make people stay for the full time for the Florida state assesments

Honestly I can understand where you're coming from. .. its boring, and it seems you have nothing to do while you wait. I can assure you, though, that there IS a reason you need to stay. The FSA is not a test with no time limit, so students have a certain amount of time to complete the test. All students are given the same amount of time and must stop when instructors tell them to do so. Some students are more mentally challenged than others, or simply take a longer amount of time to complete these assessments, therefore they finish later than other students. The students who finish earlier must stay because all students are timed and graded under the same rubric. All students test at the same time, even the ones who need extra help and time in everyday work; just because one person can take the test in half the amount of time does not mean that other students can as well. In the time that you have left after you've finished the FSA you are told to review your answers- it is wise to do this! The school system does not bend to the will of one student. .. so sadly, as long as you're taking the FSA, you're going to need to sit and be patient- just remember that extra time can benefit you too. I am a senior, so this year I do not have to take it, but in all of my years of taking it, that extra time really did help- especially for the students who NEEDED it.
Party Time!

I'm very impressed with Kanwar Grewal. I like stuff like that. And yah know what? It doesn't matter one damn little bit that I don't understand a single word of Indian/ and or the language that he is singing in. Its the music that matters and does transcends the spirit. Since this is the case, I will be checking more of his stuff out. And I did a little bit of that just now and he's got a nearly 3 hour concert in Canada - Wow he's got a really good voice who can really belt it.MAVI SINGH & DR. ZEUS FT. SHORTIE || was ehhh to me. I'm just not a very big rap fan.Now I really liked the WWE song. I like brooding somberness death oriented sounds like that. I always have. Ever since Joy Division who I think put out the greatest album ever made with Closer.OK time for FUN as stated...If you do not know who Victor Borge is, you will love this guy. If you know who Victor Borge is and you do not love him, something is seriously wrong with you. A true genius and master and none like him who brought so so so much joy to kids and adults from around the world. He still does by watching great STUNNING vidies like these for all to get a true bellyache of laughter and fun. - FF to 31:15Deadbolt = Voodoobilly surf mafioso diabolical James Bond guitar = HILARIOUS - Voodobilly ManThe Residents hve been together for nearly 50 years and hav created some of the most creative inventive musive/ certainly most influential music of all time - from Penn and Teller (in which we saw them open for the Residents when they were nobodies), They single handedly invented the CD ROM and their games were so much fun way back when. Their live shows are like none other. Precious few have seen what they look like. One show someone tok one of their eyeballs, so now one dresses up with a skull. Very inventive. But as fun as they are with their musical brand of Martian music, they are an aquired taste. - Jailhouse RockWell that's it for this sharing of songs. I hope that you got something out of them and it was not a complete failure. I did get something out of what you posted to me. Oh am am soooooo tired right now but I can't sleep. I think you know that feeling = arararaggg. I'd say "goodbye". But its not goodbye as we'll run over each others tracks soon I'm sure whether it be in music or religion. Regardless, please always tc and have fun -Michael
Party Time!

Sorry mate but those german lot still sound like paedos, not convinced! that little kid is great, really talented. great video from pssy riot, song was alright, a little bit so sluggish tho. ps. I used to watch Bollywood as a kid but the qualitys declined in recent years so I stopped watching nowadays I don't really watch film, too much dogpile. N the original aicha is an Arabic one. //////////////////////////// ok well since you used the germans twice, il go back to the Punjabi genre and give it another crack. Ive run out genres in truth, so il give a fewmore different genres of Indian music. 10: Garhva (?) Kanwar Grewal I love this guys songs, inspirational and none of his tracks are filler garbage. His songs really help me when I'm low. 11: Dooriyan (Separation) - Mavi SIngh, Shortie and Dr,Zeus Its one of my favourite songs ever because it was different at the time. I am never a fan of Shortie's raps, but this one seems to match the flow perfectly. This was Mavis' "one hit wander" so to speak but I love it nonetheless. 12: Corporate Ministry - WWE/F Totally kicks butt
Party Time!

I'm afraid I didn't enjoy the melt banana audio, might have been bcos of the poor quality sound, but it was irritating noise, hurt my ears mate!. These german sex offender wannabes were just as bad, OMG! AWFUL NOISE. Crackdown is swell n groovy. Like it. I let you off for that. NOW MY TURN 7- Jee Le Zara ( Live a Little) - Bollywood I mean if you have ever been madly in love or miss someone, just listen to this. The beat takes you on a journey, perfectly matched by the tone and lyrics. 8- Kane all star remix- Grim Sickers ft various artists (Grime) Well if you're from the ghetto or London, you will understand this. On the other hand, if you are not a roadman like me, you will find the video and lyrics absolutely HILARIOUS. ITS ENTERTAINTMENT PERSONIFIED, 9-Aicha- Outlandish no words needed mate, just listen, and live a little.
Party Time!

Well its been about 40 hours since I've slept. So after I post this I will be taking my pills and be sleeping for about a day or so. So you will not be hearing from me for that long.Now I get that its a "party" but music is something I take very seriously. But come on, please, don't send me something that you KNOW I've heard. Especially time and time and time and time again. Michael Jackson. Biggie Smalls? And you do know that Biggie Smalls is a character from a film named Let's Do it Again which is an incredible amount of fun, just the opposite of the persons, personality? Complete apples and oranges which I truly like a lot. I like polar opposites. (don't worry, this stuff was already laid out long before this debate...)Here"s Melt Banana. Now this is a band that is really GONE from the universe. They to me are the heaviest metal band of all time, though you may not hear it here, with supersonic guitar explosion guitars and pipsqueak vocals. I mean what? The first time I heard them, I truly hated them. But the more and more I listened to them, I loved them. Well admittedly they are most definitely NOT for everybody. They are from Japan and have been together (guitar and vocals) for 28 years now. - T for Tone Einsturzende Neubauten (collapsing new buildings) is a band from Germany. They"ve been around for 38 years and still going. I think that they"ve released 6 masterpieces in a row. They play shopping carts, sheet metal as drums, plumbing tubes, they took on one of their tours a jet engine etc etc etc. I find what they do very fascinating. Some of their stuff is admittedly very hard to take. That was in the beginning of their career but they have mellowed out considerably since then. - Headcleaner Cabaret Voltaire the start of industrial. They created my 4th fav album of all time with The Crackdown. They do EVERYTHING themselves. This is simply the greatest vidie I've ever vidied even from way back in 83. It still gives me nightmares to date because of its amazing correct political implications, genius footage, the best editing ever and with perfect music to boot. And that helicopter wow. I only have 4 fav albums. Everything else falls and I can't decide what comes next. Without this one album crap like NIN does not exist. - The Crackdown Me personally I like talking/ debating about/ recommending albums instead of songs because there's obviously more to recommend within that album. But that's me. Gtg please always tc and have fun. -Michael time for some sleep
Party Time!

In short, You have chosen some nice tracks, the buckethead n igorrr instrumentals are both similar to a wrestling theme so it was easy to adapt to. I liked the wote message and video, no complaints so far. This is a party not a debate so don't go to overboard w/ the analysis. -------------------------------------------------- 4: Zaz - La Pluie (The Rain) a sexy voice, a beat that grabs your attention, making you appreciate life in the moment. Can't go wrong. 5: Michael Jackson- Billie Jean No analysis needed, the song speaks for itself. 6:Biggie Smalls - 10 Crack Commandments Biggie sums up how to master and survive life in an area of high crime in just under 4 minutes, truly inspirational to young people, esp. in 90s New York, they idolised him and this song. Plus Its also a constant warning to na"ve immature people who think drugs are fun.
Party Time!

Choices for round 2: 1- Varetta Dillard, Mercy Mr Percy Link: Reasoning: Now unlike my opponent, I am very selective in my musical tastes, as I have a limited genre preference, In fact i'm very OCD (about my music). However, I stumbled upon this blues song one day (last month), and it was my first exposure to anything Jazz. It truly has some thought provoking lyrics, eg "I don't care if you hit me, as long as you don't quit me,...", such as those times. Plus a nice smooth beat to accompany her pleasant voice. Horizons-Expanded! 2: 3 Peg (3 alcoholic shots)- Sharry Mann Link: Reasoning: This video sums up Punjabi culture to a Tee, you'll get the jist of the lyrics from the video, so no need for translation. It was actually quite a global phenomena when it released a few years ago, so much so that European students at my university where playing it. Just wait until 1:55- 2:10 of the video, you will laugh, guaranteed! 3: Slow Chemical- Finger Eleven Link: Reasoning: Its a known fact that wrestling was my childhood, but some theme songs will stick with me forever, especially this one. Specifically because the lyrics relate to addiction, frustration, and anger with the world, pretty much what any teenager/young adult struggles with. Plus this theme fit the character (Kane) to perfection, at that time (mid 2000s), he played a sadistic psycho, I mean just watch the video! The song, apparently, is actually about a woman, but you'd need to be a genus to work it out! Over to you mate.
Islam is NOT a religion of peace

I'm not entirely sure who Muhammad Ali is (other than the boxer). As far as I'm aware, Islam's founder is prophet Muhammad (570-632). I agree with your second statement that there are extremists in every religion including Christianity. However, the problem arises when you ask yourself if these extremists are being faithful to their religion. Historically speaking, the Crusades weren't an act of aggression. They were an act of retaliation against Islamic conquerors during the time. Even so, those involved in the Crusades do not represent Christianity because they lie in dire contrast to the teaching of Christ. Jesus never taught His followers to wage war or even take up arms. On the contrary, Lord Jesus Christ taught us to love even those who hate us and pray for those who persecute us. "But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you." - Matthew 5:44 "Do not repay evil with evil or insult with insult. On the contrary, repay evil with blessing, because to this you were called so that you may inherit a blessing." - 1 Peter 3:9 When Muslims are killing in the name of Islam, they are obeying the commandments of Allah. Most Muslims are peaceful people. Islam, on the other hand, is not peaceful. Again, Muslims don't represent Islam. The Quran, the Hadith, and the actions and teachings of Muhammad represent the true face of Islam. In my opinion, if peaceful Muslims truly want peace, they should accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and follow His teachings of unconditional love rather than the violent teachings of the Quran and Muhammad. The Bible teaches love and mercy. The Quran teaches violence and hate. It is up to the individual to decide which is truly comes from God.