It is possible to romantically love more than one person at the same time.

2. Now that you have clarified the definition of love in premise 2 being the same as the definition in premise 1 it probably should have not have been reinstated. As for the definition of love I can now say I agree with you, now knowing you are not trying to find two different meanings and sticking to just one. As for devotion I still cannot agree in the terms you are explaining it. Devotion is to have love, loyalty, or enthusiasm for a person, activity, or cause. In no way is it possible to have one and not the other. Therefore, a person can have equal devotion for their mother and their partner especially if your partner because the person you want to spend the rest of your life with it is only right to give them equal feeling of devotion. 3. In reality love is through thick and thin sometimes even if a person is cheated on that does not mean that person is in love with the person they had the affair with it just means they were looking for a different type of attractiveness. For example, Mary and John are married for thirty years and have four kids together and John has a moment of weakness and has an affair with Amy. Mary and and John discuss the why and quickly find a solution by John admitting it was just that he was attracted Amy for a different quality his wife did not have but that does not mean he loves Amy even if she did make him feel better temporarily. Which is my point you can only truly love your wife not your wife and a random lady. 5. I am not arguing whether or not polygamy is okay or possible to occur. What I am arguing is that polygamy is not a suitable premise for advocating whether someone can romantically be in love with two different people. A man within this culture is understood to be more of a dictator figure within their marriage they do not get emotionally attached to all their wives. These men know they have these wives to only bear the children that would carry on their household name or carry on their family business. It could be possible that he could be in love with the first wife but then again they view marriage as a cultural necessity not as a voluntary gesture. 6. The last sentenced you stated " .. the husband is in love with that wife. It means that he is using her just for the purpose of getting an heir". This statement justified the argument I have for premise 5. Polygamy is mainly based off of arranged marriage and there is stories that couples over time learn to love each other but there is no way the man could love all his wives and his wives love him for being a polygamist. As a woman we crave attention from the one specific person. 7. Infidelity is not a reason to justify how someone can love two people at the same time. Once a man cheats it is because he has lost respect for woman of how the can be affected emotionally and physically. This does not mean he all of a sudden love two women it just means he's at the point of not caring anymore and is going to do anything he has to do just to get pleasured. 8. I am not trying to impose the Catholic religion onto anyone I am just stating how it is against loving two people at the same time, just how you have stated the religion of Polygamy to be for multiple lovers. As for your example of someone being a nymphomaniac a person with that kind of personality would not ever imagine of getting married for they are not oblivious they know the rules that follow being married to someone whether religiously or lawfully. They tend to always be single and jump from one female to the other better known today as "players". 10. In the early stages of dating there is no way one can love that person and continue to only date them. They would want to be in a monogamous relationship with that person. The thought of their significant other still being available to other men or women would simply drive that person mad. That is where the ugly green monster called jealously is rooted from. 11. I agreed with this premise in the first round because you stated a distinction between friendship and relationship. If you are saying that you are trying to make the distinction of love between friendship and relationship then I will continue to agree with this premise but if you are trying to clarify with you saying it is the same type of love then I would have to disagree and will soon follow my argument as to why. So which one will it be?