Banning Muslims From Entering U.S.A Is Great Idea

My response to my opponent's argument: My opponent misunderstood my argument completely! He misunderstands my argument for saying " they are responsible for the MAJORITY of the terrorist attacks or any other attack " quote from my opponent's argument, he was debunking that statement. No, that wasn't what my argument was about. I was discussing how radical Muslims are starting to hurt people therefore we must ban Muslims until we can figure out what's going on. My argument wasn't about comparing radical Muslims to the other one nor was it saying we should only focus on radical Muslim terrorism. Let's take a look at my opponent's argument. First argument he makes is that only two percent of Europe's terrorism is done by Muslims, this is the error I was talking about. These arguments don't deny the fact that radical Muslims still are causing damage like the Orlando shooting. Also on top of that he doesn't really give us a link to the sources, no links at all to the research. He says Euro-pol claimed that, but he doesn't give us any links to the research that Euro-pol supposedly made. So no links to his sources, that's a major flaw. His second argument is questionable at best, yet again he makes the same flaw as the first argument. No links to his sources, just expects us to believe FBI really said that. Also the research he gives is from 2013 and 2005, but than now this is the present we aren't talking about the past. And in the present one of America's worst lone wolf mass shootings was done by a radical Muslim and the sources I give about radical Muslims attacking are around the present time,like the German report being 8 months ago. So we can see that these horrible attacks are starting to rise up now. Also just like the first argument, this isn't against the idea that banning Muslim from entering America until we can understand what's going on with these attacks. His third argument was that christens are a bigger threat to American people than radical Muslims. This argument doesn't make the idea of banning Muslims till we can figure out what's going on invalid or wrong. Nor does it take away the fact that a radical Muslim did a major mass-shooting. And than his fourth argument is him talking about how Donald Trump is not concerned about American people, and how he is trying to fulfill his own political agenda. But he never makes the idea of banning Muslims invalid or wrong, nor does that argument even attempt at that. He than talks about how banning Muslims will make them lost their jobs, this is true but I don't want more mass shootings happening. He then says Muslims looks like Asians it will mix them up. First of all we're looking for their religion, and I'm pretty sure those Muslim immigrants will come from places where radical Islams are around. So we would have no problem. He then says the radicals will enter the state anyways because how strong they are, he forgets how strong our defense is. And we have radar, so it would be really hard for them to force themselves inside without being blown up by our defense. ISIS is not as strong as American army, this was a weak argument. Voter do you really think ISIS could breach our America's defense and force themselves inside? He then says the radicals can harm Americans without coming to America, he says they can use airstrikes. So their airstrikes would be able to come over to America and hit us? First of all like I said we have a strong defense, but that's quite distance. Even if they were able to get missiles over to America our defense would notice it with our radars and stop it. We have missile defense, it's called the NMD. He then says Muslims contributed a lot to American society and banning them would be a insult, first of all we have no choice and there are radicals attacking. Second of all this is a emotional argument. My opponent than says there are Muslims serving in the military, this is true but we still need to block out Muslims to prevent radical Muslims from coming in. Plus we are only blocking out immigrants. And his tenth point is that banning Muslims will cause them to attack Americans who enter Muslim countries. First of all that shows that radicals are dangerous, as they blame one American and attack him, even if he wasn't responsible for the attack. Second of all we are focusing on defending America, if a American wants to risk his life and go to a Muslim country where radicals are than that's his choice. But we should defend America from attacks, and we should prevent them from being attacked by Muslim radicals. Sources: http://www.globalfirepower.com... http://fas.org...