Here are a dozen easy to understand contradictions that indicate the impossibility of the god story

Here's the link to the version without website-caused formatting mistakes. Https://docs. Google. Com/document/d/1hB6CUzqg4HetyOS8OmyywkUFMrQFOnCWCb6gKt8bZTk/edit? Usp=sharing Well, This is getting annoying. I like how you"ve not addressed my rebuttals of your previous points and either attacked my other statements or added new information. Very tricky. Also, I looked at your profile and found that we both like Pink Floyd and Deep Purple. Funny how these things happen. However, I happened to read one of your other debates" and how it degenerated into you calling your opponent a "scattered snot meat sow toxic brain cabbage batbrain" and saying "This time don't put the dingbat clause under your cabbage batbrain while you meow at the moon in your pink panty love song fable nosebleeds. " Well, If that happens, I"m out. Although it was creative on a website where you can"t cuss. "First off, You can claim that you are a christian, But in reality, There is no such thing as being a christian. Its a true impossibility. Nobody follows christ to the exact detail and thankfully neither do you. Also christ was a false messiah. Also like god, There is no proof for either's existence. " Christianity is an impossibility because no one follows Christ to the exact detail? I"ll be the first to admit I don"t. That"s the point. Christians know that they are imperfect and that they need to be saved from their sins through Jesus. Christ was the only perfect person. "Also Christ was a false messiah. " Not seeing any proof for that or the next sentence. "There is no proof for either"s existence, " well, Ya just said "No one follows Christ to the exact detail. . . " confirming his existence. Hmm. OK, You do a lot of yelping about how the Bible"s infallible because God wouldn"t use text as communication. Even with a microscope, I can"t quite see any proof for that. I don"t believe in the pope, Btw. Catholics are not Christians. With all this translation stuff, First of all, The Bible was written in three languages, Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic. I also think many translations are incorrect and misguiding in some ways; the simple solution is to either learn the source languages or consult multiple translations. God designed the Bible so that it"d be written in three different languages, Proving he understands the changing of language over time, Therefore it is fine to translate the Bible. You can"t expect everyone to become fluent in three extra dead languages for their religion. The Tyrant and King stuff, The Hebrew word means either, As Tyrant had a different meaning to those people. Translation issues are a problem, But it all comes down to trusting God that he"s guided the translations correctly. (It"s not proof, But it"s what we do. ) "Here"s some major supermassive hypocritical contradictions (out of a good 1, 000 or better) in your bible making it unreadable"" You said that in your previous argument" after which I destroyed all those points (which weren"t even yours). I haven"t seen any response to that yet. But anyway. . The Matthew/Mark contradiction is a "contradiction" of sorts. But it"s not important to how we understand the Scripture. People are fallible, And one of them made a mistake, But does it matter whether Jesus healed everyone who was brought to him or most of them? Not really. The one about the law of the OT: the law is not only in the Old Testament. Apocryphal books that were removed by the Church founders or Luther included this statement. I don"t really understand the contradiction in the fourth one, Maybe you could clarify. There"s no contradiction in the Matthew/John verses. The inscription on the cross " they all mean the same thing, And it"s not important to theology or spirituality which one is correct. Also, There"s translation issues. Genesis! That Adam would die as soon as he ate the fruit meant he would spiritually die, And be able to see good and evil and therefore sin. Genesis 5:5: whut. There"s no contradiction. You just don"t believe he lived 930 years. All in all, There are slight inaccuracies throughout the Bible (mostly in the Gospels, Which all account the same thing. If you have four people write down separate accounts of one event, You"re always going to have discrepancies), But none of them are "supermassively hypocritical" as you claim. None of them have anything to do with the really important bits. "Here"s how the Dossier of Reason sees it. It is correct btw" OK, Well, What I"m saying "is correct btw. " Doesn"t mean you accept it. A. Over 450 English versions. True. I don"t see the problem. B. Wait, Here it is. All are translated using different methods and from different manuscripts" well, Not really. The same methods are used, Just different synonyms or phrases are included to make it understood to different people, Or easier. I don"t support that practice, But that"s a minor issue. D. No true translations of the Bible leave out chapters. II. Availability " a definite problem. Yet people are working on that as we speak. As for absurdities, You started off this debate about contradictions. That meant accepting the Bible"s truth and finding errors in its own statements. So absurdities don"t have any place in this debate. So I don"t really have to deal with those. But, Uh, "those who are 13 or younger have not developed a consciousness until that age? " What? Correct me if I"m wrong " but I don"t think we"re doing the same kind of debate. You seem to be just throwing information at me, Which I have to disprove. However, Debating is about presenting logical reasoning and then undermining each other"s positions through rebuttals " not including new information after each round. Also, I"d like it if you"d please refrain from simply copying stuff from books/websites and adding it in, Because that"s just lame. Thanks.