Naploleon Bonaparte would defeat George Washington in a war.

Rebuttals "napoleon won all of his battle with tactics. he lost the battle of Waterloo due to poor tactics. since napoleon was an emperor and he was the dictator of his army,the credit of winning and losing of battles can be given to him." Napoleon lost the battle of Waterloo because of his officers not cooperating. "battle of fort Washington: lost due to disobedience of Colonel Magaw" Okay, I'll give you that one. "battle of brandying: lost due to heavy fog." So? The British had heavy fog too. Besides, Napoleon won many battles with fog. "battle of germantown: lost due to natural calamity: heavy morning fog" Again, the British had fog too. Napoleon won many battles with fog. "battle of monmouth: draw by Washington's tactics" Not because of Washington's tactics, because of number. The British were not only outnumbered, but also some 1,000 soldiers died from heat stroke because of their uniforms. Washington's plan to split the thin British line actually failed. "battle of sara toga: won by tactics and help of France." This is irrelevant. Washington was not even involved in this battle. It was Horatio Gates, Benedict Arnold, Benjamin Lincoln, Enoch Poor, Ebenezer Learned and Daniel Morgan that commanded the Americans. "so you see, first 3 battles are lost due to either non cooperation by his men or natural calamity like heavy fog. and to add insult to injury the congress refuse to fund war. inspite of these hardships the battle of monmouth was draw due to his own tactics and the battle of saratoga, he got french help." Only one of the battles were because of non-cooperation. As for the natural calamities, both sides were affected. Also, George Washington was not involved at all in Saratoga. "Nevy was an important factor for any administrator but irrelevant here since both napoleon and washington fought on battle field and not on the high sea." Navy is very relavent because the topic is, "Napoleon Bonaparte would beat George Washington in a war.", not "Napoleon Bonaparte would beat George Washington in a land battle." Napoleon Bonaparte has the advantage of the Navy, which would be a big factor in him winning the war. "that's ok but why french came in the war? it is because of a treaty of alliance between french monarch and second continental congress. so finally the tactics of congress help washington won the battle.that does not reduce washington's image because without the help of the rulers of a country the army of that country cannot win." We were looking at the battle tactics. Not if Washington had support or not. My opponent argues that Washington has also won battles, and Napoleon has lost battles. This is true, but lets look at the battles Washington won. Yorktown- The British were outnumbered 3 to 1. Washington also got French support. Battle of Eutaw Springs- British were outnumbered and the US lost way more men. Saratoga- Victory Trenton- Outnumbered the British. There were 2,400 American troops with 18 guns. 1,400 Hessians with 6 light guns. As you see, the battles Washington did win were because of number, while Napoleon won battles when strictly outnumbered. Napoleon used tactics. New arguments Artillery- Historians agree that Napoleon was a master of artillery. Washington barely had any. Cavalry- Napoleon had many cavalry. Washington barely had any. Sources http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.britishbattles.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.theamericanrevolution.org... http://www.wtj.com...