Ignorance of the Lord Justifies Being Sent to Eternal Damnation

I do not think that the validity of the Bible is the issue in this case. My assumption is that we are talking about the God of the Bible. I used Bible verses and he used Bible verses, so the only god we could be talking about is the God of the Bible. If we are talking about the God of the Bible, then it would make sense to use the Bible as a viable source. If my beliefs or my opponent's beliefs differ from the Bible, then a strictly opinion debate should be opened, but as we are debating a part of the nature of the God of the Bible, then I believe that the whole Bible should be relied upon as a trustworthy source of information. I would like to comment that I never said that everyone has heard of God. I stated, as my opponent acknowledged, that God put a conscience in us as a way to show us Himself. I read a story about a Muslim woman in the book, "The Case for Faith" by Lee Strobel. I do not think I can retell the story or the moral any better than the book itself, so I will quote it. If you have access to it, it is on page 226. Ravi Zacharias is telling this story to Strobel in an interview. ". .. let my tell you what happened in the case of a Muslim woman who worked for a very well-known institution in her country. She told me how she was leaving her office at the end of her day's work and was very unhappy in her heart. As she was walking, she muttered, 'I don't know why I am so empty,' and after that, out of the blue, she said, 'Jesus, can you help me? ' She stopped on the sidewalk and said to herself, 'Why did I name him? ' Well, that woman ended up becoming a Christian. In her case, I think God saw a heart that hungered for him but did not know how to reach him in the cloister of her existence. I think this was God breaking past the barriers of her environment because she was already breaking through the barriers of her inner life, seeking after him. Thus, God can reach into any cultural situation in response to anyone who wants to know him. " Just one page ahead of this story, pg 265, Zacharias reads Acts 17: 26-27 to Strobel. It says this: 26From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live. 27God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. Zacharias then goes on the explain what the passage means. He says, "God knows where we will be born and raised, and he puts us in a position where we might seek him. We are clearly told that wherever we live - in whatever culture, in whatever nation - he is within reach of every one of us. There is always the possibility of a person crying out on their knees, 'God, help me' and if that happens, there ways in which God can minister to them that are beyond our understanding. " The verse my opponent used before did state that God sent people who rejected him to Hell. I didn't think that was a point of the debate. The debate was about whether or not God sends "ignorant" people to Hell. The verse doesn't mention "ignorant" people anywhere. In his conclusion, my opponent is right about my quote. There are ignorant people, but the ignorance we are talking about is a very superficial ignorance. This ignorance in only mental. My examples, explanations, and verses have proven that there is a much deeper sense of God in every person. Whether or not they reject this or not is the determining factor of whether they will be sent to Hell or not. If they acknowledge their need for a Saviour, then God will provide a way for them to be saved. They are not spiritually ignorant, but mentally, yes, we can call them ignorant.