Stalin did not Practice Communism Effectively

Communism, as an ideology, was not responsible for the deaths of thousands to millions of human beings considering that subjects did not practice Communism in an effective manner. It is the main reason as to why subjects classify Stalin's USSR and Mao Zedong's China to be "Stalinist" and "Maoist" nations considering that both subjects had produced dictatorships based on a cult personality rather than theories presented by Karl Marx. To claim that Stalinism and Maoism is Marxism or Communism in practice would be the equivalent to claiming that one is practicing basketball while playing football. The argument indicates that subjects did not necessarily apply the theoretical approaches within the so-called "Communist" nations. However, the term "Communism" was utilized as a mechanism towards persuading the public that the USSR and Mao Zedong had served the interests of the proletariat. In reality, the state functioned as "The Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie", identical to the modern-day capitalistic system that continues to serve the interests of the wealthy elite. The working-class shall control the Means of Production through a Pure-Democratic system that elects LAWS rather than REPRESENTATIVES in order to serve the interests of the proletariat through a majority rule. One ignored the premise indicating that "True Communism" or "Pure Marxism" would involve forming a Pure-Democratic state that provides citizens with the ability to elect Laws revolving around domestic and foreign relations. Thus, the state would not consist of a representative that is capable of serving the interests of themselves or the bourgeois-state considering that the state would be automatically governed by The People or Proletarians of the state. Incorrect, due to modern-day technological advancements, manual labour shall be replaced by automated-machinery that is capable of producing unlimited, free, and sustainable food, clothing, shelter, and energy while completing services throughout numerous practices within the planet Earth. Modern-day technological advancements involve automated mechanical arms conducting brain surgery on human beings in a mathematically accurate manner without undergoing any form of emotional instabilities such as anxiety. Furthermore, China has recently developed a massive three-dimensional printer that is capable of producing ten dwelling places or households per day with recyclable materials such as hemp. Thus, replacing manual labour with machinery would provide human beings with the ability to utilize their time to research information within educational institutions, libraries, and research centers while practicing numerous other hobby-based activities such as the arts in order to contribute innovative ideas and inventions to humanity. In other terms, 100% of a nation's population shall attain a free education in order to produce advancements for humanity rather than utilizing countless hours labouring within an occupation in order to attain the subsistence to life. Based on countless case studies within Cuba and The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, subjects are willing to participate in roles within their nation despite the incentive for currency. For example, within Cuba, a waiter or waitress is more likely to attain a larger wealth-based incentive than a doctor through the attainment of tips from customers. However, Cuba's literacy rate exceeds the majority of advanced-capitalist nations considering that the inhabitants of the state are willing to attain an education for the purposes of functioning as doctors, dentists, Lawyers, engineers, professors, teachers, nurses, and social workers despite the low wage. Thus, these case studies confirm that human beings are willing to attain knowledge or information while functioning as numerous important roles within society without remaining dependent on a materialistic incentive considering that the humanitarian act is much more rewarding than the materialistic incentive. It is one of the main reasons as to why human beings undergo an increased state of satisfaction when their persons assist less fortunate human beings than to merely attain a paycheque considering that human beings are naturally a compassionate species, identical to the majority of mammals within the planet Earth. Marx claimed that a "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" shall provide working-class citizens with a prosperous lifestyle while controlling the means of production against the exploitative bourgeoisie. As previously stated, a "Dictatorship of the Proletariat" would involve forming a pure-democratic system that classifies "THE PEOPLE" as the dictator of the nation considering that citizens shall possess the ability to vote for LAWS rather than representatives of the state. For example, the decision to invade a foreign nation shall be based on the VOTES of CITIZENS rather than the decision of a representative. A dictatorship is defined as a person or POLITICAL ENTITY that maintains control of the economic and political relations of a nation. Thus, if the PEOPLE or PROLETARIANS were to function as the DICTATOR of the nation, the RULER (the people) would represent the interests of the proletariat as "The Dictatorship of the Proletariat". P.S. It would be a NON-REPRESENTATIVE NATION.... excluding the idea that THE PEOPLE REPRESENT THEMSELVES THROUGH MAJORITY RULE.