Politcal Correctness Is Bad

1. Countering Con's first point "Pro states that the liberal/democrats use political correctness as a weapon to silence those who have an opposing political view" I would like to clarify that not ALL Liberals/Democrats are like this, It was a mistake on my part. Many Liberals can be accepting of opposing political views, "Yet he has stated no evidence that shows a liberal or democrat politician (the only way you can be sure that they are a liberal or a democrat is if they 1. tell you or 2. are a politician in a liberal/democrat party) " While I never said the politicians silence the views of their opposition with PC, Normal Citizens with liberal views try to silence Citizens/Politicians who are conservative Here I have some evidence regarding instances when liberals/democrats tried to silence conservative views. Ben Shapiro being silenced for talking about conservative views at a majority liberal university . http://abc7.com... Video clips of liberals attacking people trying to attend the Ben Shapiro talk: Facebook trying to censor conservative views . http://gizmodo.com... . http://www.dailymail.co.uk... So you can see that from these instances that some(notice I said some) liberals have to restore to pulling fire alarms to stop conservatives from talking, blocking people who want to listen to a point of view that may differ from them(Liberals AND Conservatives wanted to hear what he had to say) They used tactics like creating a human wall around the doors to enter the talk hosted by Ben, Kicking and punching of people trying to get through the wall, shouting chants at people and companies want to look "Politically correct" so they try to censor conservative news outlets and people from talking. While they are using the rules of political correctness to find justification of their actions like how ISIS uses the rules of Islam to justify their actions. 2. Countering Con's Second Point "Person A: 'Terrorism would stop if we banned Islam! ' Person B: No it wouldn't it would create more extremists because not all muslims are terrorists (in fact 0.06% of muslims are in terrorist groups) so by banning their religion you would create extremists out of moderates who felt the need to defend their way of life. Person A: Then they can stay in the middle east where they belong! You political correctness types are what's wrong with the world! " Oh man, I have seen this tactic all the time. He states that I confuse political correctness with a valid counter argument which I don't. But let me talk about his Tactic. His Person A and Person B example is very very wrong he tries to paint person B as a cool, collective and calm person(who just so happens to be a liberal) and paints Person A as an rash, brute and unintelligent person(Con is implying that Person A is conservative). First of all, The tactic Con just pulled is called a STRAWMAN logical fallacy or commonly know as "Putting words into someone's mouth". I think he assumes that since I'm a conservative that I believe the Islam should banned which I DON'T by the way. Here is a example: Say for instance that person A is a proponent of Windows, while person B is a proponent of MacOS. Person B may say "MacOS is a great operating system. You'll say that it sucks because 'there are no games' for Macs, but this isn't the case. Here is a list of mainstream games that run on MacOS: you obviously don't know what you're talking about. " Now, person B has branded person A as ignorant, but it might have been that person A wasn't even going to bring up the 'no games for macs' argument. However, since the debunking of A's fictional claim occured immediately, before A even had a chance to say that he wasn't going to mention games at all, B has 'scored a point' by false means. Con just did the ol' Strawman 3. Counter Con's Third Point I looked into some articles about Transgender Brain Scansand that their is some evidence about it being true(which I will admit that this theory is plausible) it's still a THEORY it has not been fully proven, I would like to see a study with a higher sample size(Maybe 1000 transgender people vs 1000 males and females) One important thing you forgot was "correlation does not mean causation" . http://www.tylervigen.com... From this data i can assume that people divorce less when they eat less margarine which is WRONG. Final Thoughts: "Pro does this is that he seems to think his 'facts' are right 100% of the time" I Never said that I don't believe in a big liberal conspiracy that's hogwash.