Womens rights and equal judgements

My oppnent quoted <>> I believe is wholly inaccurate, the other day I went to work in a short skirt and boob tube, I was subjected to ridicule, disdain and disciplinary action. However female colleagues who have dressed in a similar style received either a neutral or positive reaction. Thus it is clear to me that it is men who are the targets of abuse in this matter and that women actually have greater rights in regard to provocative dress. My Challenger is stating that women endure positive reaction for dressing provactively and this is very true, and this is part of my arguement im not denying that dressing in a sexy way does not get sexual positive attention, it can also as i believe distain negative attention , though this is complete unfair as you cannot win both ways! , my opponent goes on to say that men are subjects of this abuse. .? Please state why, ? Women do have more rights to provactively , women have more complexed bodys, more curvier physique. . look at the women role models for example marilyn monroe" a huge men idol, She was known for her " classy sexy look", so women are to believe that dressing in a sexy way is a womens provocative. My opponent goes on to say, that in a modest way she went into work wearing a long skirt, and still recieved negative and ridiculed attention, Im not denying that dressing this way does not get negative attention, my whole arguement is based on women that dress sexy are endured to deragotory perceptions and a more complexed Judgement. My opponent also stated This is entirely subjective, certain male social groups will express disdain for promiscuity, certain female social groups will actually encourage it. If one is to look outside these limited anecdotal accounts to the wider society, men's magazines, reality TV, tabloid headlines, it can be seen that popular culture actually endorses and encourages promiscuous women. Yes the media does exploit the fact that promiscuity is a way forward for women, but they dont state " sleep with 6 men and be popular and congratualted by your girlfriends" Some megazines teaches women to have a sexy style, they enduse women to for eg: Try different sex techniques , etc , Reality tv processes these negative views , for eg I read a story where a women was seen giving head to a footballer, and was slashed all over tv,and bieng branded a " slag" whore" etc, this is a perfect example for unfair judgement the media seeks this out, whereas the footballer was not as much ridiculed for cheating on his girfriend! My opponet also redges on and says that women are seen as weaker in a different aspect, like physical strenth and leadership roles, As we all know scientifically men are more physically stronger than men so i dont deny that one, women are undermined in certain areas for example emotional and psychological behaviour, women are seen as week " More scared stressed out" whereas statistically women are more emotionally balanced, and structured than men. My opponent goes on to say that One example of this is TV advertising, men are consistently parodied and portrayed as nothing more than big kids who would be helpless were it not for a woman. Can you elaborate further? , Advertsiing usually involves men as potrayed as " all mighty" and a women weak at the knees, for eg: The lynks advert, where is shows a women "fall in love with a guy" for wearng the deodrant this projects a shallow and typical perception of women. Also my challenger states. . Who decides how to decorate the family home, the woman, who decides what type of bread the family buys, it is 9 times out of 10 the woman. Furthermore Men understand, and are conditioned into accepting this constant demeaning propaganda in good cheer, they have therefore in this sense accepted on some level their inferiority to women. This is a usual agenda, men are usually accepted for women to have a better knowledge about style, and colours, but men have the biggest role in determining what wiring goes in, wear things should go electrically, where things would look suitable, . .so what is my challenger saying? that men have an inferior role because to my knowledge it seems to go both ways, yet there is another perfect example of minor discrimination by saying " women can deal with the colour style, because women cant deal with the prone of electrical stuff etc" I do agree that men and women have different, sexual, emotional and physical awareness, yet my arguement is that women have been degraded , into believing that they fit into the mens genres of sexual tendencies , that the perfect perception of a man to a women is almost as exact of theirs. Overall i believe that men are strucutred more biologically, and can be seen as " protectors" " stronger" etc, but i still believe women are undermined in this, and are raked as seen as " cleaners" housewifes" the more domestical aspects and this is a common statistic. I ask my opponent this, your examples of women bieng inferior is saying that men endure more discrimination? ( due to his examples and statements) In conclusion i do not think women should be treated in all things, it should go both ways, women should be able to dress act, be the way they want without thinking they pay a role of bieng this & that , men and women are obviously gonna fall into different sectors of strenth, but my main arguement is that women should have the rights to be not seen as " vunerable" and be more known for what they can do domestically.