The God of Abrahamic religions is not real. (Christianity, Judaism, Islam)

You seem to misunderstand what I mean when I say you can't take it literally. I don't mean to say that what you don't take literally is false, instead, I am saying that there is a deeper meaning behind the text. But I do agree that there are flaws in the Bible due to translation issues over the years. However, a few errors, whether they are related to translation or not, do not make the whole text invalid. Let me give an example where this is true. In Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism, he hypothesized something called the Aether, which was the medium which light and EM waves traveled. Now we know that this Aether is completely false, however, every other part of Maxwell's theory is correct, and we still use it today all the time. This can be true for the Bible as well -- there may be flaws in it, but that still does not as true as Harry Potter. Again, you misunderstand the analogy, and the text itself. Eternal torture and fire does not necessarily mean that there will be exactly as it describes. It is a analogy used for us to understand how we will feel about it, and what it may be similar to. If God is a just God, then he obviously will not hold people accountable for the things they have done if they do not know He exists. Again, you seem not to understand the analogy. Did you forget my point about how the son will go back to the slums by himself because the son cannot understand how to live in the high-life? God could beam us up to Heaven, but he would continually have to do so after we continue to do things which lead us to Hell. Isn't it much more elegant to have us learn so we need not depend on God in Heaven? And where does it say that when He forgives someone he still makes them suffer agony? The whole point of repentance is so you do not need to suffer agony, even after you make mistakes... As I said, it does not seem that you understand my analogy. First, what is unreasonable about it? All you did was give another example of it, but you did not prove that the argument is illogical. This is just basic statistics, but you would have a case if there was proof against the existence of God. but there is none, as there is no proof for the existence of God... My main point is that we cannot objectively say whether he exists or not. Next, where did you learn that Quantum Mechanics required the theory of relativity? The Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are two incompatible theories -- they contradict each other. Finally, you gave no proof to your allegations about the Bible, so what you are purporting is still invalid The Bible does not say that the Earth was created in 7000 years ago, please cite your source. This is not the core concept of Christianity, it is only a huge misconception spread by James Ussher.[1] But this still has nothing to do with the existence of God. And what do you mean for the "chances of him existing"? There is absolutely no chance that he can exist, statistically, just as there is no chance that he can't exist. The existence of God has no place in statistics or science since there is absolutely no evidence for any hypothesis. I am a straight man, and I have nothing against gays either... but these things are really irrelevant to the debate. Please cite your source, where does it say that God hates homosexuals? Yes, I just said that faith and belief are irrelevant to science, please reread my post, you seem to misunderstand my point. You just said in your previous post "I chose to believe in Science" But belief is nonexistent in true science. Opinions also are irrelevant to science, as science isn't about the subjective thinking of opinions. You have plenty of misconceptions about the Bible: You believe that it says God is space-less and timeless. This is false, it only ever says he is timeless.[2] You believe that it says that you go to hell even after you repent. This is patently false, since there are numerous scriptures which tell us otherwise.[3] You believe that God can just beam people to Heaven. You perhaps do not know of the Laws of Justice and Mercy.[4] You believe that it says that the Earth is only 7000 years old. There is nothing which indicates this anywhere in the Bible You believe it says that God hates homosexuals. Again, there is no where in the Bible which says this. In this case, the Church is irrelevant. What does the Church's beliefs do with the existence of God? What church are you even talking about? About your first example, it still has nothing to do with whether or not God exists. This can happen, and God still may fully be within the possibilities of reality. As for your second example, I really do not see any logic in it whatsoever. This is what you said: God knows everything > He knows all your thoughts > therefore you cannot have free will. This makes no sense. You third example only rides on your own misunderstanding of God. He would allow this all to happen because he is testing us, because he wants us to learn and grow, and have an understanding of good and evil. It is perfectly reasonable for a evil world to be ruled by a good God, this only shows that he allows us to have free will. But none of these points disprove the existence of God. Any attack towards Christianity, or any other religion as a matter of fact, is futile, since the ideas of organized religion and God are not intimately connected. I.E. one does not require the other. We see this fact in theists who choose not to participate in any kind of organized religion.[5] My central point, is that we cannot say that God does exist, nor can we say he does not exist. God is outside an sort of proof or evidence. Either you accept Him, or you do not. Any argument against a religious sect, or against His actions do nothing to provide evidence against his existence. ---- 1. http://en.wikipedia.org... 2. Isaiah 57:15 3. Revelation 2:22 4. James 2:13 5. https://www.facebook.com...