Splitting of the USA

I see multiple problems with your logic: 1. 30% military spending not being feasible without increased taxes and/or debt. If Dixie produces R revenue, the military spending would be R x .30 . Thus leaving R x .70 for the rest of the economy. Of this, the little social benefits provided by the government, education, infrastructure, and research and development would be funded. How would only using 70% of R for non military expenses hurt our economy. How if we do not go outside of this funding. Therefore, this is economically feasible without debt or increased taxes. 2. The elderly. All would stop paying into social security effective immediately upon my arrival in office. Thus, approximately 6.2% of the income of all the people would not be given to the government and would be kept in the people's pockets. It is the people's responsibility to invest in life insurance and retirement. 3. Technology All I can say to this is that a silicone valley will emerge in Dixie. Google, "Supply and Demand." If there is a demand, there will be a supply. 4.Imports The benefits of having imports are small. Dixie would have plenty of agriculture and oil resources to last(primary sector of the economy), would have plenty of people to build auto manufacturing companies, clothes companies, and basic manufacturing areas(secondary sector of the economy)(It also has every item required for a nation to industrialize), would have plenty of people and college opportunities to open up service type jobs(tertiary sector). Once all three of these sectors are encouraged(all of which can be encouraged giving the location and resources of Dixie), the science(quaternary) and management(quinary) sectors will emerge. Thus, self dependence will be possible with as few needs for outsourcing and importing as possible. You mentioned auto manufacturing. If imports of cars become too expensive, GMC and Ford will begin to manufacture cars and car parts in Dixie. This would produce massive amounts of jobs. 5. Exports Exporting will still be allowed and encouraged. The country would get money into the economy through this practice. We would like to have an extremely favorable balance of trade. 6 Psychopath I am no psychopath(at least not in the typical sense). I simply analyze things and see motives and ramifications of certain things more than others. My analysis produces results that society would be unwilling to accept and thus calls me crazy. My analysis would work. As far as enslavement, I would not have slavery in Dixie, but I would not hesitate to make other people drill for oil for free because that would increase profits gathered from oil sales. As far as bigot-okay I may can agree though, as my friend once stated in regards to me, "He does not believe that his race is better than another; however, he believes he is better than everyone." Couldn't have said it better myself. Narcissistic- How is not wanting to be controlled by a liberal government or congress narcissistic? Unethical-dislike of gays and desire to restrict the people who come into my country is not unethical. 7 Conclusion My policies would all work and my opponent has failed thus far in disproving them. A strong military is necessary to national defense, low spending is necessary to remain out of debt, self dependency will provide jobs when possible, and a favorable balance of trade is basic economics-more revenue than expenses is a profit. While I may not be good for the rest of the world, I can assure that Dixie will be protected and economically successful. In addition to being free from powerful government control and liberal policies, education reform and a simplified tax code would be instituted by me. A vote for me is a vote for success. -Commander of Dixie