new generation video games give a better experience, opposed to older games

I’ll address the contentions that have been made. Let’s proceeded in an orderly fashion Lest start with Contention 1 I’ll use the quote of myself that has been taken, "Therefore age cannot truly be a factor ofwhether or not newer, games give a better experience or older ones." Myopponent seems to think that I am wrong in saying this however let’s look intothe facts behind this statement that I have made. Generalization: We cannot say that every 40 year old will like oldergamming and that every younger person will like the newer gamming, this isgeneralization. As I stated in the previous round that there is this faction ofage, this line in the sand that mustn’t be crossed. This leads me onto mysecond fact. Lack of evidence: neither my opponent nor I can affirm that majority ofgamers like one generation of games to another. I do not have any facts to backup that word “Majority” and I believe that my opponent doesn’t either. The ageargument is based on what we think to be the Majority and not based on anyevidence what so ever. I would also like to ask where in my previous argument I said “rework some games like Mario and Donkey Kong”. I said however that there are emulatorsthat can play the old games, piece for piece an exact copy of the game. Also theNintendo Wii offers these games also if you download them. I would be happy tobe sighted as to where I said this. To finish of this part my opponent seem to be giving a lot ofstatements about age for example, “Someone whom is 30 +, they maylike the first Mario better” “This is often the case with people 18+, if you ask them they would saythey love new generation, but if you ask their favourite games you will oftenget answers like Zelda or Mario”. Where is the evidence to back this up, and also when I initiatedthis argument I had in mind the whole of the community of gamming. Contention 2 I believe that I don’t have to go intoany further depth with this argument about graphics and development I haveclearly stated my argument on it and so has my opponent. Contention 3 plot Have I rustled your jimmies mate, just kidding. The argumentabout the plot was merely contesting the one you made. “Older Games offer the same type of plots,stories, and music that new generation games offer, if not better”. Ifyou were just stating that, “older games still had good plots as well as the new ones” where inthe previous argument did you state this, the plot section was explaining whyolder gen stories are better. Accordingto the topic sentence “if not better” implies you are contesting that newer gengames have better stories. Again I havemade my statement on plot and I will not go into it further and I will be happyto be sighted as to where you may have said the things quoted. Contention 4 music What I have said about the new gen and old gen music remainstrue. However game play and experience of the game are entirely different to mystatement of the music. I believe that newer generation games give a betterexperience. The statement you made aboutthis “Thisis a statement I would agree to, one that says older generation games provide abetter experience to some people while newer generation games provide a betterexperience to others. The story and the plots have always been amazing, andwill continue to be amazing”. If you or I believed this, then I asks you this why are wearguing the topic. In my statements I say that newer generation games give abetter experience to all and you believe that a majority say the oldergeneration games are better. The fact that I’m claiming new gen gamesovershadow older games is correct, but aren’t you saying that new gen gamescannot hold a candle to older generation games. I stand by my statement and I thinkyou do to. Contention 5 "AS we can see the rules have changed andgame makers anddevelopers are free to release to multipleplatforms and are set at a marketbased value of consumption and price. Thisgives them the ability to free roamand explore the art of video gaming that’s whynew generation games offer abetter experience. " I don’t understand the statement of how it is irrelevant tothe topic. Let’s put the whole thing into context. The original argument was “Old Games Paved the Way for New Games” myopponent went onto explain this point. I then contested it with this “Nintendo would only permitlicensees to sell carts made by Nintendoitself; cash in advance, with a minimum orderof 10,000. Games licensed for NEShad to be console exclusives for two yearsafter launch, and each company waslimited to just five games a year”. I then explained that how and why these games these games possibly didnot set a road for newer generation games, please review if you must. My topic statement for this contention statesthey are able to explore the art of gamming that is why newer generation gamesgive a better experience. Like any good art you need to find the core of what you’redoing to make it a success. I would like to point out some errors in this argument. “They are focusing onthis generation” “Since the majorityof gamers are younger” Companies like Bioware and square enix are focusing on themajority of gamers on the contrary of your statement that majority of gamersare younger is false. Majority of gamers the average age of a gamer is about 30and has been playing for at least 13 years. http://www.theesa.com...; if the companies were truly aiming it at younger people then why do theyexplore darker themes and why are the ratings always so high. Can we not saythey are aiming it at the average age rather than the overused statement thatmajority of gamers are younger. To sum up I have stated my case as to why newer generation games offera better experience and superbly defended my case. I would have to say that I have proven a muchstronger case as opposed to my opponent.