Mormonism teaches a different Christ than the one from the Bible.

Ok, so since you didn't answer the question, what sect of Christianity are you? How does this sect interpret the bible? This would be very helpful to know because it gives a better background for your platform. All Christians don't have the same fundamental doctrine. All sects of Christianity have different views on doctrine... that is kind of why they are separate churches. Every sect also claims that they are the true church. Just simply look up "what is the true church" and you will find a wide variety of Christian churches that claim they are the true church. Also, you can't say someone is Christian because you disagree with their doctrine. Although I disagree with the doctrine of the Jehovah's witnesses, I still view and respect them as Christians. In fact, Merriam-Webster dictionary states that a Christian church is defined as "one [church] who professes belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ." So if you don't agree with one's view of Christian doctrine, you can't say that they are not Christian. You can't pick and choose who is Christian and who is not. If that was the case (which it is) then there would only be one sect of Christianity: yours. Mormon's (LDS) don't teach that there are multiple Gods, they teach that if we follow Christ's commandments, we can have the potential to become similar to our Father in Heaven. Our progression will never change His identity as our Father and our God. Indeed, our exalted, eternal relationship with Him will be part of the "fullness of joy"" He desires for us. Also, having the Book of Mormon as another testament of Jesus Christ does not make us non-Christian, It makes you Anti-Mormon. My opponent's concern with JSH 1:19 deals with the Apostasy of the Early Christian Church. This is an entirely different topic and would seriously take me forever to explain in the middle of this debate. So if my opponent wants to debate about the Apostasy, then I would suggest that he should start another debate. Now, to my scriptures that my opponent attacked... in a weird way. Let's make man in our image: I never said anything that linked this scripture to our equality to God. My opponent seems to just answer this scripture by repeating what I already said; which is "God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. ". So I'll ask my opponent to attack this scripture another time, but without repeating what I said. Genesis 3:22. I said: "After Adam and Eve partook of the fruit of "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil," God said they had "become as one of us," suggesting that a process of approaching godliness was already underway." and my opponent repeats this same conclusion with Genesis 3:22; which states, "And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:" (I do not know what version of the Bible that he used). The repeated conclusion is this: after Adam gained that knowledge and consequences of good and evil, he had "become as one of us,". In mortality, it is essential to know good from evil to progress to an immortal state. It seems for Psalm 82 and John 10:34, I am debating F.B. Meyer. I would like to debate my opponent instead. I'll ask my opponent to display some of his own ideas into these scriptures next round. "Partakers of his divine nature": exactly. As immortal beings, we will be free from sin. How cool is that? Fallacy: Ad hominem arguments: My opponent seems to be attack me and my religion more than the topic at hand. He states, "You believe what you believe because you were taught that. You did not get those conclusions from the Bible. You definitely didn"t get them from God." Instead of attacking my arguments, my opponent is attacking me as a so called "unbeliever". Like seriously? I believe what I believe because, yes, I was taught that. But I have also studied it. I've attended my church meetings. I have read and prayed about my scripture reading. I have felt the Holy Ghost confirm to me that what I believe is true. I know it, and I know that God knows it. What right does my opponent have to judge me as an unbeliever? This is fallacy, I would like to ask the voters to please not let my opponent slip away from this crime. Also, I have read the whole bible, so that must make me a believer? Straw-man fallacy: My opponent is under this fallacy because he states that Mormons (and Jehovah's witnesses) are ignorant "unbelievers". This is not only a false claim, but just a claim without any evidence to prove it. He has even falsely accused me of many beliefs, such as worshiping multiple Gods (untrue). Because of this, he falls under the straw-man fallacy. My opponents scriptures: I have already responded to my opponents scriptures. Please check my round 1 as a reference. This doesn't conflict with LDS doctrine. I only worship one God (Art. of faith 1:1). I do not say there are many Gods, but that we have the potential to become Gods after the last days. Our progression will never change His identity as our Father and our God. If these scripture were anti-Mormon, then why would I accept and agree with them? My opponent is very confused with this argument. There is no other Heavenly Father. Conclusion: I am following the God of the bible and His teachings. I do accept Jesus as my Lord and Savior and through his atonement, I have found a great love and relationship with Him. Please stop trying to belittle and accuse me of following a false Christ. I love Jesus Christ, and I cannot deny that He is real. Think about it. Sources: lds.org http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...