BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Rap Battle

Wow, this is the second time I've been complimented by my opponentKinda defeats the purpose of a battle rap, though, don't it?Al Capone shitt, he's just a cop eating a donghnutComposting rodent, I'm the pest-killer meeting my quotientscurrying like a rat as my cat goes on the chaseembrace your place, as my bat retraces your facelaced with mace, cold-clocked and shot for taste my gat erased, any chances of you winning this raceI don't need a repair, I'm a self-healing musketeerdrop the fear, I'll send you down river with the gondoliercigars and beer, as I cheer from destroying your rap career's veneerdear auctioneer, if he's the British then I'm Paul Reverewarning of invasion, I'm brazin - vacating on an abandoned plantationhe's talking about chainsaw's but I promise he's no jason let's castrate him, feed his balls to the ravens and dalmationscessation, if he's the king, I'll leave a donation for his abdicationYou suck at poetry, they even dissed you in a commentno water from the faucet as their is no content in your walletfvck the nonsense, the shitt you spit is vomit from an omeletyou're nothing but coal energy, trying to out-produce the atomicIf you were a bear, then consider me a double-barrel shotgunI'm blowing you up faster than marathons in Bostonpractice caution, or your body will be found bloated and rottenYou stay stunted with your growth while I continue to blossomTalkin bout nitty-gritty when you're nothing but a shiitty-fiftyexcept if you were shot nine times you wouldn't be sitting here wit mequick get whitney, I'll be in houstin with madonna and tony montanarocking a bandana, while dropping off this fagg in lousianabend over boy - it's time to make you squeel like a piggyI'll go deliverance on your flow and send your body back stickygross, I know, but this skinny hippy thinks he is trickythe only reason he's mad is because I wouldn't let him in my committee
Rap Battle

You think I'm humorous, a funny clown,but you're wrong, you're gettin' beaten down,you think you're good 'cuz you live in Rhyme Town,but we all know who's here wearin' the Rap Crownyour diction is pretty good, I'll admit that's true,but your claims are as just rotting wood an' out of the blue'cuz I'm the real boss of poetry they all fear meEdgar Allan Poe? Why he's just an honoreehe jumps and run even when hears my namean' I may be a bear but I'm impossible to tamegrowlin', snarlin', and clawin' gallons of bloodyou'll scream like a girl and fall down with a "thud"Think you can get away with usin' my words?Oh boy do you want to get split in thirdsyou'll never see me comin' along with my chainsawan' nobody can help you get any pain withdrawnyo mama, yo papa, even your little kitty,I'll be ruthless to all, skin them to the bone,but the part of the boiling is the true nitty-gritty what happened to them next will remain unknown simple words cannot describe the pain you'll getif your friends've any idea what it is they'll want to abscond, facing such a mad man like me their pants will get wet,they won't be able to make a move or even respondso you better be scared, small helpless shivering blade-y the damage that you'll get cannot be repaired
Rap Battle

You talk about zapping like you got a zapadosI trap the most, an act a ghost - the type that hacks n chokesI slash these jokes, come back and laugh at folksYou couldn't zap me even if you had a sack of voltsI rap these bolts, this is a sheep vs. a captive coltI act in revolt, and kick-back these wack raps he wroteI stacked the votes n backtracked to snatch your throathacked your hope, this is what happens when it's crack you smokeA fear of tiny flowers, and powers beyond my comprehensionascension beyond this tension as I test him with condescensionmention of a pension for a disability like hypotensionreinvention, I know God and you are not he - is my contentionYou're masking your lack of quality with quantity, and you blowYou couldn't put a stop to me, for victory, even if I throw he who be, the one to see, that theE. aint A. PoeIs he who be, wise as me, but they already know I have no boss biitch, or love, the twist is I'm a studentHence my E.A. Poe reference, above, which is missed by the stupidI contaminate with my flow, your shitt is barely pollutedI'm the general they respect, when you pass by, you're barely salutedThat shitt about Mikal... literally didn't rhyme at allyou dropped the ball, and cried as you walked the hallsimpossible flaws, bite down like gargantuan jawsphantom with claws, your nothing but a panda with pawsAhh shitt, look, ya boy done did it againI feel like I already won so now I'm have some fun with this pen-manship, my wrist, looks frozen like an alaskin lakeI've got mink condoms on my dickk, but your wife calls it a snakeshazam, god dizzam, i'm eat this kid like some hamcatch the lamb, into the pan, he was never a manwhat's the plan, what's the action, what's good n what's happeninit's like a contestent on the voice trying to out-sing Eric Clapton
Rap Battle

You think I'm a slave sheep,but in reality you're the true slave of the heap workin' day and night just to be paid one centand sometimes your boss even says it makes no sense--you got poor looks and your got no skills,when the taxes come home you don't pay no bills,your braggin' just shows how sad your life is--what kind of person needs fiction an' ignorance for bliss? Why it's just your false claimsthat will gain me mighty victory for justice's name,for fallacies easily bring down the houseof everyone's arguments, even Mikal'sIn addition you claim to be a Blade of Truthwell the last verse was shame on you,it just showed your mouth is full of loose toothand thus your argument has failed to come through.
Rap Battle

You start by calling me pretty, thanks for the compliment My complex content of comments prop me up like a monument The dominant, heat-seeking missile sent to destroy the incompetent You’re like an acre of land trying to claim you’re a continent You bring the rattle-tattle, I’ll bring the battle saddle Then ride my horse to round you up for the cattle chapel You see, you’re nothing but a herd-mentality slave sheep I shave deep, and leave you hairless like a gay creep You’re a piece of spastic plastic, I sting with the static Aint no drastic tactics to deploy on this basic fanatic
Poetry contest

My mind is prone to render meaning andto think a rock a cake in want of food.Complexity will ache the brain. In turnit strives simply to be and keep alive.The noble lie closing one's eyesis good for those who won't suppose. For me, to know is sweet and todeceive my self is not a choice.Faerie and elf may bein a tea pot unfound;I must choose (win or lose)what I accept as true.Is evidence such a big fence against that which others propose?Does it make me aloof when Iask for such proof to appease doubt?To they that say that faith's the way and proofwill out when you submit to some old book, I say that faith is chance brought out of birth;One myth is just as good as another.
Poetry contest

Obviously, this is a poetry contest debate. Anyone may enter, as long as you meet the following criteria. 1. You must have done at least one debate. 2. You must know what and how to create poetry. Here are the rues. 1. No dropping out. (or not finishing on time) 2. You can use any type of poetry. 3. Obviously, no swearing. 4. You post your poetry on the second round. Good luck to my opponent, and in the words of Effie Trinket,"May the odds be ever in your favor!"
god or nut

This is an irrelevant comparison. It is reasonable to assume that there is a nut inside a nutshell. We know this because that's how most nuts are. We have seen, touched, and cracked hundreds of nutshells in the past, and know that most nutshells have nuts in them. As for god, there is no reason to believe that god exists, just as there is no reason to believe that the universe is inside a giant snow globe or obama's actually two midgets in costume.
god or nut

Pro has just repeated his responce, and completely ignored my rebattals, making his case invalid. I will now quickly summarize the debate. I have proven that it is reasonable to beleive that a nutshell contains a nut because of probablility, our understanding of nature and nuts, and prior experiences. This differs from the question of God, as a beleif in God is not supported by our understanding of the natural world (as God is, by definition, supernatural), probability (we have no other universes to comare ours to, and can't establish whether God is probable) or prior experience (we have no prior experiences with other universes, while we do have prior experiences with nuts. ). Pro has completely ignored these rebuttals, and just restated his claims.
god or nut

I have not experienced an unbreakable nut before. However, since the only description pro provided of the nut was that it's unbreakable. Because of this, we must assume that the fact that it's unbreakable is the only thing special about the nut. Therefor, we can assume that the nut is similar to other nuts."Is it reasonable to beleive that there is a nut inside?""Is it more resonable to believe that there is a nut inside... then a little dragon"I have responded to these contentions multiple times. Pro has just ignored me and continued to restate the question.I repeat: it is reasonable because of our previous experiences, understanding of nuts and nature, and pure probability.
god or nut

It is reasonable to beleive that a nutshell contains a nut. This is based on our previous experience of nutshells and how they work. We know that nutshells are grown around nuts to protect the nut, and ensure the survival of the next generation of the plant. We know that the only purpose of nutshells is to protect the nut inside. We know based on our previous experience of eating nuts that nutshells usually have nuts in them. Basically, we know that a nut being inside a nutshell is probable because ouf our previous experiences and understanding of science.However, a god is not supported by perevious experinces, our understanding of nature, probablility, or logic, while a nut inside a nutshell is. This is why this analogy is wrong.Beleiving there to be a dragon inside a nutshell is a lot less logical then beleiving that there is a nut inside a nutshell. We know that there probably is a nut inside a nutshell, based on the reasons that I have already stated. The hypothesis of a dragon being inside a nutshell is not supported by anything, while the hypothesis of there being a nut is.\Source: http://science.howstuffworks.com...;
god or nut

Yes, but most of the time, shells have nuts in them, so it is reasonable to assume that this nutshell has a but in it. The tiny dragon analogy is better, and I think it fairly accurately represents theism atheism and agnosticism. A theist thinks that there's a dragon inside the nut, an atheist thinks that there isn't because he has no reason to think that there is (because most nuts don't have dragons in them), and an agnostic thinks that there's no way to tell. However, since this debate didn't have a resolution, all o have to do to win is disprove everything you said in your first speech, which I have done.
Star wars - On balance the jedi are evil

The debate is currently inpossible to accept - pm or comment me if you intend to debate me.ARGUMENT - On balance, the Jedi are evil.BACKGROUND - Jedi, in cannon star wars, are depicted as guardians of the galactic republic and defenders of democracy. That being said, they come to conflict with many groups, external and internal, who belive the jedi do not represent the good of the galaxy. One of these disillisioned people was one Anakin Skywalker. In a duel, he remarked 'IN MY VIEW THE JEDI ARE EVIL' - A remark that I will attempt to debate.RULES1. No kritiking/spamming all that jazz.2. Only cannon sources may be used. "Legend" are not considered cannon and illegal. Legends that claridy cannon points may not be used.3.Con must not "argue" in round 5.4.Con can "argue" in round 1.5. Con argues that "WELL THEN YOURE LOST!" While Pro argues "IN MY VIEW THE JEDI ARE EVIL!"6. The definition of evil is "morally reprehensible : (1)"1. https://www.merriam-webster.com...
Creationism In Public Schools

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" This is commonly called "Separation Between Church and State". It is in The First Amendment of The US Constitution. If you have even the most basic understanding of the Government, you would know that the State Government establishes schools. Creationism is an inherently religious hypothesis. You cannot put something from the churches into State or National places, be those schools or otherwise. If you were to do as such, you must actually include everyone's religion in it. If you allow Christians to put up a nativity scene, you must allow Pastafarians to put up Flying Spaghetti Monsters. In short, read The Constitution, and get god out of our schools.
Music education should be required in schools.

Thank you for accepting the challenge! 1. My opponent has argued that buying instruments is impractical because of the cost. I am going to use the following chart [please refer to source #1] as a reference for the average class size in the United States; which is about 20. Currently, about 23% of all public and private schools have a uniform policy, and the average yearly cost that parents pay for school uniforms is $249, resulting in a total of $1,300,000,000 spent on uniforms alone [2]. Considering this number, if the 23% of schools that require uniforms simply cut back on their cost or stop requiring uniforms altogether, right there you have $1.3 billion that can be spent on musical instruments. Additionally, the benefit of instruments is that (if taken well care of and provided with the proper maintenance) they can be reused and last for decades. 2. My opponent stated that there is the issue of whether or not "students are willing to participate."Willingness shouldn't be a factor. If it's required, then students (includings minorities) have to participate. And even if some do lag behind others, isn't that true in every other subject in school? Some may be more mathmatically driven, while others prefer creative writing, while some may be better at PE. In a class of 20, some may love music, while others hate it. The point is that that's how it is in every subject in school. Additionally, there are subjects (such as PE) that are required in schools because of their benefits. As of 2006, 95.2% of high schools required PE. However, please look at the following graph [please refer to source #3] showing how many actually liked it, despite the fact that they were required to take it. If students are not given the chance to learn an instrument, how will the child ever learn whether or not they love it? 3. AP Music TheoryMusic theory: "the study of the theoretical elements of music including sound and pitch, rhythm, melody, harmony, and notation" [4]. This is music THEORY. Not MUSIC. You can learn as much as you want about the treble and bass cleff and how to read notes and understand key signatures, but this will never be the same as learning an instrument. Sources: 1. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com... 2. http://www.statisticbrain.com...3. http://www.jstor.org...;4. http://dictionary.reference.com...;
Music education should be required in schools.

1. It's not practicalIt's not practical or fair for schools to invest in instrumental music and instruments for those who can't afford, and to accommodate a multitude of students to join what should be a completely arbitrary class. The expenditure of schools should be focused on ergonomics and salary rather than instruments and second-hand experienced, out of state/province band directors. There is also the case of whether students are willing to participate in this instrumental music as they might lag behind the others. This is where the criticality of the No Child Left Behind policy plays an important role, because some students have disadvantages, (be it physical or mental). A teacher cannot spend time with one out of thousands of kids when he/she is highly decorated for instructing an ensemble; not every kid will receive the conditioning they may deserve. Richard Kessler, Dean of Mannes College The New School of Music and former Executive Director of The Center for Arts Education explains, "The disparity between what schools offer and what students actually receive can be enormous," Bear this in mind as he explains how "...the data isn't telling you [is] that you can have schools where there is one music teacher and 1000 students. Some of those students are going to get music and some of those students aren't." I've highlighted the important parts of this chart that display the disparities between the negative and positive factors to consider, concerning music education. According to the chart, minorities are less likely to participate in band, based on the statistics, and obviously the people who receive free lunches are the minorities in the band who probably can't afford the amenities that come with band. Community type, and as mentioned earlier, the student to teacher ratio are detrimental to the success of an instrumental music class as well. 2. Not the question you should be asking Whether schools should be required to teach music to students shouldn't be the question you ask, but rather whether music has positive benefits on people, which is undeniably true. I do agree that music improves cognitive skills, young or old, but that is a small factor to consider that pertains to your question. Now, there is a branch of music education that is completely practical, and that I still do not think should be imposed as a requirement, which is AP music theory. Meant for music majors, this class teaches all things music, from history to terminology, this rigorous class will surely prepare you for your musical endeavors, but it, too, shouldn't be required.Sources:http://www.npr.org...http://nces.ed.gov...
Music education should be required in schools.

I am arguing that music education should be required in schools. My reasons for believing this are as follows:1. Music raises children's IQ. In 2004 E. Glenn Schellenberg randomly assigned 132 first-graders to piano, singing, theater or no lessons at all. To his surprise, he found that after a year of these lessons, the IQ scores of the music students increased more than those of the other groups [1].In a study performed in Canada involving 48 preschoolers, after only 20 days of music training it was found that it enhanced the children's ability to plan, organize, strategize, and solve problems [2]. 2. Music education affects language development in the brain. Recent studies have clearly indicated that musical training physically develops the part of the left side of the brain known to be involved with processing language, and can actually "wire the brain’s circuits" in specific ways [1].3. People who play instruments are better at multitasking. Musicians need to simultaneously read music, feel their instrument, respond quickly to the sound that it produces and even adjust their way of playing to match a metronome. Julie Roy, a postgraduate researcher at the auditory-neuroscience-research library at the University of Montreal in Canada, led a team of researchers in testing fifteen musicians with differing years of musical experience as well as fifteen nonmusicians of the same age group in sensory-processing tasks. In fact, the longtime musicians “were more than twice as accurate at distinguishing touch and hearing” [3].Conclusion:The benefits of music education are undeniable, and, as such, it should be required in schools. Sources:1. http://www.pbs.org...2. http://www.wsj.com...3. http://www.edweek.org...
this house believe that it is impossible to be perfectly happy

I disagree. On many people's wedding nights they are perfectly happy. Their family is around and they are getting married so family and relationship related feelings are happy, your best friends are probably in the wedding and there so you're socially happy, usually a honeymoon follows the wedding so stress is released, usually couples on their wedding nights and honeymoons are having sex so they are sexually happy, and obviously you were able to afford a wedding plus a popular gift is money. If you have around 120 people and they give anywhere from 50 to 300 dollars to the newlyweds so you're money happy. For at least the hours following the wedding ceremony, many people are perfectly happy.
Evolution is a fact

Some creation scientists discovered three things that suggest that Dino's are still living. First, they found major evidence in the Congo. Leaves stripped from trees up high, foot prints, and they even found its lair. They recorded its breathing, and the local tribes have tons of legends of this beast. Second, some researchers found a baby sea dwelling Dino in a whale belly. Third, there have been sightings of flying "lizard looking things." Cars at night have also seen what look like headlights above them. Some species of Dino are known to have reflective eyes like a cat. Two more things. 1:How do animals evolve if DNA prevents it? 2:How do you explain the grand canyon?
Evolution is a fact

first, I'm going to say that I'm not going to even look at the wikipedia pages. anyone came write on there, preventing it from being reliable. let's debate again, and I'll try to get the hang of giving links that are reliable. before I disprove what you said I'm going to give a few links that are very hard on evolution. Dino's still exist. here are some links. http://www.allaboutcreation.org... http://www.skygaze.com... http://creation.com... http://www.discoverynews.us... http://s8int.com... http://www.salem-news.com... http://ghostradio.wordpress.com... i think that is enough. but if anyone wants more, Google has a ton more. I stopped reading the 3rd link you gave when I found it to be inacurat. now, this may be slightly off, but according to the apologia general science book, you can go farther than a theory. step by step as you put it down. 1- it doesn't matter how close our DNA is to a chimp. God obviously used a master plan to create the universe. anything alive has DNA. all things alive can since and respond to change, and so on through the criteria for life. thing have order and ritham. if you look half way like a monkey your DNA may have a reasonable. (although I have never quite thought my face looks like a monkey :) we both have 4 legs and hands and look humanoid.) 2-even Darwin gave up natural selection after studding it all his life. it e. DNA can't make new plans for say, lungs, unless it already has the plans in it's DNA. 3-so? I'm saying that they didn't evolve at all. I think that you haven't given enough evidence to say that evolution is a fact. the Dino links I gave are evidence that it isn't fact, so.... any way, it was fun.