BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Is God real and is the Bible accurate

I would like to tell you that the Bible does have mistakes. But these mistake are not great and by this I mean that there are few spelling errors and animal mix ups because of the large number of translations. But as supported by the Dead Sea Scrolls this remains true in the way the only simple spelling mistake and animal mix ups are present. And as far as the snake shall crawl on its belly and EAT dust you have to think of it not so direct. What I mean by this is that when the serpent was to eat dust the Bible doesn't mean actually eat it what it is saying is that the serpent is level with it ,that other animals are blessed with legs to keep them off the ground (off of the dust). These so called problems with the Bible are not problems they have a more in depth meaning than what we may see and a glance. It's similar to reading a Shakespeare play now even though it makes complete sense at the time and even now if you think about it and don't just glance. Back to the how did organisms come from nonliving things this is reasoning question that has been thought about by every person for thousands of years and many many people have come to the same conclusion and this conclusion points to a god or entirety...God. And fast forward to about 2000 years ago. When Jesus was on the Earth. Scientifically Jesus of Nazareth was on Earth and but the only thing is whether people think of him as more. He did things that were incredible things that turned people away from there very strong belief in God (Judaism) I mean if people didn't actually see Jesus of Nazareth do these amazing miracle's why would they turn away from there very strong belief. The Bible does not support rape, murder stealing or anything of that nature. It is very against it. why don't you instead of looking it online because things can be changed ONLINE look in an actually copy of the Bible to get your answers then do some cross checking online to clarify. You see like I said there is a deeper meaning to the words in the Bible. I mean come on people of all types of intelligence even the genius of human kind all point that God and the Bible are true. Of course you will have some modern intelligent people going against it but the reason for this I believe is false information and lack of complex reasoning skills. I once did not believe that the Bible was true ,but I searched for information EVERYWHERE and bias and unbiased information and I found that the Bible makes complete sense and even using scientific evidence and reasoning it makes sense and this is why it is true and this is why it has withstood attacks for the past thousands of years.
Is God real and is the Bible accurate

"how can a living organism come from nonliving things." Scientists disagree on this and i really don't think about it that much. You say not to answer without actual knowledge of what i'm saying. But i'll still answer it the best i can. I don't know that's my answer. I don't know how life came from non-living things, but there is no evidence that points to the answer to this question being "God did it". If you do have proof of this i would love to hear it. You didn't talk about the bible but i know you will later in the debate so i'll talk about that: The bible is a book that has a "Old Testament" and a "New Testament". Together this book was written over the course of about 1,500 years by a lot of different people with different views. Example: Genesis 1 and 2 state different things. Was Adam created first or vegetation? Depending on which type of Christianity you believe in you may not even think the Old testament was real. I think that's weird because Jesus talks about it in the New Testament and even supports it. Now the whole "the bible is accurate" thing. Simply put...No, it's not accurate. The bible says that bats are birds and not mammals. Exodus 21:12 states: Anyone who strikes a man and kills him shall surely be put to death. When Romans 12:17 states: Do not repay any one evil for evil. Genesis 3:14 states: So the Lord God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, ... You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust" when snakes don't eat dust of dirt as some say. The bible is full of things like this. And above all of that, the bible has been re-written hundreds of times and by now there is no way of knowing which one is the right one. This is the reason the bible is not a credible source for really anything. And if Atheists for some reason had a book that supported mass-murders, rape, slavery, child abuse and killing, Christians would say terrible things about said book and the people that support it. As they should. The bible is terrible and the only reason people still support it is because people say that the bad things in the bible weren't meant to be taken literally. (even though the bible says in 2nd Peter 1:20-21: But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.) I commented on this debate about clarification but i already wrote this so meh...HERE YOU GO :)
Upper Class Rap Battle

Heareth I do lie, but only about not being in a relationship with your sister. Engaged, to be her mister, I left her, but now I miss her. Thus it’s true I departed, for I could not stand her after she sharted. In light of recent events, I must contest the defendant’s indecent contents, for her crime of prostitution is contrary to our constitution, so bury her after her execution. Like a frog spawns tadpoles, Emil forms glory holes, But she’s the one shoving her d*ck through the hole so men can lick it, These men are loving it thick and taking it whole so she can dipstick it. A once cherished daughter, now thirsty as if for water. Content with her quest for d*ck she will not rest until she is sick. Drowned in both sorrow and in cum, she shakes and wiggles her needy bum. In her drunken state she awaits a bed bound fate, drowned in lust and the desire to mate, this is my opportunity to rape. As her p*ssy is popped by my puffy penis, she gets a C for her cunt and a C+ for it's cleanness. She loves indecent exposure, the feeling is recent as her eyes glaze over. Decayed dribble does drip from her lips, all the while she’s thrusting her hips. She’s quite quiet as she’s rammed from behind, face down arse up, the feelings unkind. As she foams from the mouth, she moans and groans from the feeling down south. Her vaginal fluids are running a muck, it would seem she is coming from the fvck Like a thieving goblin, she ran away after receiving a nobin. Indeed she seeks the seed of man, to be impregnated without a planWhere art thou Emil? Thou stole my semen and didn’t take thou's pill.
Upper Class Rap Battle

To Masterful, composed on the 8th of November, 1850One proposes to own a wife However, last night you were copulating with me and inflicting upon my neither region a terrible strife To respond to your quips regarding my intellect; it's perfectly possible for a woman to be a lascivious whore but still possess a mind that a gentleman such as yourself could only long for Your penis may provide me satisfaction, as well as your rough spanks and slaps across my face, but Master, it would appear you lack intellectual grace and are truly rather debaseIt is your prerogative to abuse my fine, nubile figure but when you begin to insult my intelligence you present as increasingly bitter Perhaps, Master, I should assume some control myself; by tying your hands to the bed and then riding your penis like a wild inbredMy luscious breasts will bounce joyfully up and down, by the time I have finished you will want to bestow me with a crown You attempt to place your face within them, hoping to embrace my sweet flesh; now you realise that you were so very wrong to affiliate me with fish and realise you have never had a woman this freshAs I see your eyes long to grab hold of me, I will let your hands free; as you place them on my soft hips I smile with glee Oh Master! Please bring unto me the utmost delight and fill my licentious cunt, feel me become ever more wet as you gruntThe sensation of your glorious sperm explode inside me is so thoroughly enjoyable, as I lay there beside you, I see that your penis is still firm You forcibly grab my hips and turn me over as if I am a rag doll belonging to an impoverished childYou now take me from behind and I continue to be defiled In the morning, however, I challenge you to a debate; and you naively take my baitAs I sit there in my corset, you become more distracted than a drunken sailor in DorsetEach word that you utter, I challenge with unbridled ardourOh Master, you have entered a state of complete languorBut still, I show no mercy and become ever more thirsty I whip you with my knowledge and charm, and inflict on your ego terrific harm Once again, you underestimated my cognitive talent and are now not looking so gallant To conclude my rap; I request that you now take a much needed napFor, I have vitiated your self-worth and left you feeling less than sufficient Oh! I devilishly enjoy your embarrassment at being intellectually deficientI suppose you considered yourself a Dickens, now give unto me my full ten shillingsWe have arrived at our conclusion; with Master outwitted and outsmarted For hereth lies Masterful, my dear departed
Upper Class Rap Battle

I don't endorse the use of a horse, but needs must, It takes more than a man to tit wank that bust… ….I mean….Ahem.... To whom it may concern,~__________________________________________________________________________~ I cannot be aroused by an erotic, yet accurate depiction of one’s life, For I am a noble man and I own a wife! Good ma’am, art thou an intellectual or a whore? I’m uncertain as to which. For your speech is ineffectual and that of a bitch. Ahh, I see now. You’re just a lowly peasant, heavy and unpleasant, leaking a foul pong that is wrong and omnipresent. Now I ask unto thee, art thou so blind thou cannot see? For your face is a tale unto its self, masked by malicious mis-intent. Thou failed to pay thou’s monthly rent. Alas. Art thou content I ask? Ma’am, beneath you I cannot lay, as your queef runs astray, the implication is neigh unto nay for your father raised you the wrong way. For a poor whore ye run afoul mouth girl, pre-pubescent, sold as an adolescent. It’s a mockery of British ideals, Your insults are sheer cock-blockery, Now go prepare the meals. A woman should not exhibit such an insidious verbal manslaughter, For a man has already bought her, defiled and bethought her. She need know her place, for beatings are common unto her face. As a man would take his old dog out back to be shot. I’d do the same to you, filthy thot. Your tiny female brain wouldn’t have the chance to feel any pain. Thus my methods would be somewhat humane. Women’s rights? I’m rather amused with this mattering, Women should be abused and subject to a battering. This is no matriarchy, a woman’s hierarchy is below a dogs, and in this oligarchy women don’t need dialogues. Now go jump rope you pretty little insect, I have no time to pity brittle intellect. Cook, clean and remain unseen, for my eyes need not be bothered by a human sardine. Fish to the eyes and fish to the smell, what is appealing about a walking clamshell? As a gentleman of high birth, I must direct you to my enormous girth. Come hither ye foul wretched wench, I’ve come for your figure but not for your stench. Through your lineage of countless incestuous encounters, you’ve been courted as a countess, claimed to callus cock-driven killings, and called out for a few shillings. For the life of a whore is such, breasts beaten and back-sides filled with much. I pity thee, foul demon, with your ribbed dildos and taste for semen. ~__________________________________________________________________________~Kind regards and yours faithully,Masterful
Upper Class Rap Battle

Why thank you, kind Sir! Now, seeing as this is an unusual rap battle anyway-I will be assuming a submissive role. One may think of Masterful as the powerful and rich rapper, and as me as one of his hoes. However, that I will be his bitch doesn't mean that I will have less rhythm and less enjoyable raps-and this is what prospective voters should base their vote on. My rap to Masterful, composed on the 7th of November, 1850To my dearest Master, it is your sweet, submissive whore Oh! How I beg on my knees for your succulent penis, please give it to me I implore I want to wrap it around my sultry lips and suck on it all night, believe me my Master, you will not put up a fight I'm your Victorian mistress, more enthralling and titillating than wild citrus Pull on my lustrous hair and then indulge in my buxom pair My nude body stands beside you, please Master, may I sit in your lap and have your strong, masculine hands circle my hips as if they were a world mapBut then Sir, you must punish me for my philandering with a local black servantOh how I delighted in his enormous penis, as if I were a naughty little serpent What great girth it had, I admit, somewhat larger than yours It appears that my longing for it continually endures I require a violent slapping of the face by you, Master; you need to teach me a lesson or two And show me that engaging in intercourse with a black male will end in disaster Oh! Please slap my lubricious lips again, put your rough hands on my face and spit into my mouth and then bite down on my ravishing breasts Abuse me more ferociously than men do to one another in the most bloodthirsty of conquests!After you have finished impaling me on your wonderful cock, I will lick it perfectly clean; relishing the delightful fusion of my feminine juices and your splendid spermMy punishment should not be complete until you have made me squirm I think Sir, it is time for you to take off your beltFor you need to ensure that my punishment for this awfully sinful transgression, is truly felt Only then will I know, that spreading my legs open for a black male will leave me whimpering in pain for every tomorrow; do not show any mercy, make me bleed like the fine red wines of BordeauxTo you, Master
Upper Class Rap Battle

This is an upper class rap battle; meaning that you have to rap like an upper class person, preferably from 18th-19th century England. One may write as many lines (or 'bars', as they are commonly known) as they like. Structure: -First round acceptance, second round opening raps, third round rebuttals and closing raps. Rules: -No forfeits. **********As Masterful has expressed a keen interest in this battle, I have chosen him as my opponent. Good luck!
Religion is a problem for socety

When you say religion you have to be specific about which religion you mean there's Christianity, Judaism, Mormon, Islam ect but in my opinion none of them is a problem to society but one which is Islam. Why I said that is because all the major terrorist attacks; 911, London 7/11 bombings, Paris attacks, Westminster attacks all done in the name of Allah none of them has been done in the name of any other prophet in any other religion no other religion especially Christianity has not caused society any problems in a way, it has helped society so in conclusion to the argument Islam is a problem for society.
Gay Marriage

Ok . This roung will go Affirmative, then you post your case, and an arguement to mine . Everyone has the right to love whom ever they would like. A marriage is defined as "a bringing together of two souls in love" . Is a woman and a woman, or a man and a man, not souls? They are, and they both need the right to love who they love. This is why i stand in firm affirmation in todays resolution. Contention 1:.Same-sex couples should be allowed to publicly celebrate their commitment in the same way as heterosexual couples. The Human Rights Campaign Foundation states that many same-sex couples "want the right to legally marry [and] honor their relationship in the greatest way our society has to offer..." This is through marriage. Homosexuals are humans too. They have rights too. And for this, they should have the right to marry who they love. Conention 2. Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. Many benefits are only available to married couples, such as hospital visitation during an illness, taxation and inheritance rights, access to family health coverage, and protection in the event of the relationship ending. An Oct. 2, 2009 analysis by the New York Times estimates that a same-sex couple denied marriage benefits will incur an additional $41,196 to $467,562 in expenses over their lifetime compared to a married heterosexual couple. This is denying same sex couples things that normal couples have, which is going against the constitution. Contention 3. The concept of "traditional marriage" being defined as one man and one woman is historically inaccurate. Given the prevalence of modern and ancient examples of family arrangements based on polygamy, communal child-rearing, the use of concubines and mistresses and the commonality of prostitution, heterosexual monogamy can be considered "unnatural" in evolutionary terms. So not only are you defining same sex marriage wrong, you are contradicting traditional marriage as well. As i said, gay marriage should become a right . And HUMANS should have the right to love eachother.
absolutes=existence

absolute=no possibility reality is not possible anything that is created or constructed is a machine, and reality is not created anything that is non intended is nature supernature exceeds nature, cant be real, if superman was real he would be natural supernature=imaginary prediction is belief, not knowledge, i have no memory of the future, i have to imagine it you are reading these words, it isnt something that can happen, it is happening, it isnt possible, just like it isnt possible that you are not reading these words, if you are.. reliable information is religion, religion=to rely on, while self is one i know i am typing these words on my keyboard and reading them on my screen, i dont have to imagine it
absolutes=existence

Hi, I'm getrekt20 and I look forward to debating with you.I might need you to clarify on what you mean by "absolute".Do you mean when something is absolute, you cannot change it? Or do you mean that when something is absolute, it should not be viewed in a metaphorical or absurd way?Anywho, let's get started. "everything that exist is absolute in that it is what it is and not what it is not a rock is absolute, it is a rock. nature is absolute, yes its not a machine and neither is your body, sry theists" I'm sure we've all been taught as a child that a rock is a rock. And regarding your other sentence, what you heard was probably an analogy of a comparison between machines and life. I would appreciate it if you could provide a source for this claim."it is absolute that there is no supernature in reality, it is absolute that there are is no knowledge of the future, it is absolute that you cant close your eyes and read on if you are human, its absolute that you are reading these words, its absolute that you are being now, as you read these words"What is supernature? Supernature as in large forces caused by nature? Nature is a big topic and I need you to clarify what you mean by this. There is no knowledge of the future that we can comfortable rely on; however, the human race is intelligent enough to predict events in the future. Yes, it's absolute that I'm reading your words, but it seems that you have no reliable information about the idea of things being absolute. This isn't much of an argument.
absolutes=existence

everything that exist is absolute in that it is what it is and not what it is not a rock is absolute, it is a rock. nature is absolute, yes its not a machine and neither is your body, sry theists it is absolute that there is no supernature in reality, it is absolute that there are is no knowledge of the future, it is absolute that you cant close your eyes and read on if you are human, its absolute that you are reading these words, its absolute that you are being now, as you read these words
Staying Single is Better

Alright, here we go. The resolution implies that staying single is better than engaging in a romantic relationship. I will deconstruct my opponent's argument to demonstrate how her points have remained inconsistent to her position in this debate, and have unfulfilled her burden as the instigator in the affirmative position. Good luck! Pro's first contention is that in holding out for Mr. (or Mrs. -- hehe) Right, you can avoid the mistake of a lifetime and marry for love instead of desperation. This argument is weak for several reasons. First, one may not want to marry and merely wish to date around instead. In that case, marrying for the "wrong reasons" wouldn't apply to them, so this is not a strong point. Second, not everybody knows if they have the time to wait. You could go at any moment, yeah? Not to mention, there's that old urban legend that a woman over 40 has a better chance of getting blown up by a terrorist than getting married. That statistic is false; however, the idea that it's harder for an older woman to get married is socially upheld. Finally on this point, let's remember that Pro's position in this debate means that she must argue for remaining single over choosing to be in any relationship; even one at an older age. Pro continues to argue that it's best to wait to get married because you'll have more time to date, and will increase your odds of beating the divorce statistics. I have a few things to say to that. For one thing, if you don't engage in a serious relationship, you'll have no idea how to behave in one. Experience is the best teacher, and without prior preparation, one might not know how to cope in a relationship (i.e. learn trust, the proper way to argue, a way to balance everything in your life, etc.). Therefore staying single instead of committing to a relationship might not be the best idea. Second, having a relationship has significant benefits and advantages that being single doesn't. Psychology tells us that human being have a natural longing to seek fulfillment from a romantic relationship. As such, having a partner makes people happier than those who don't have partners [1]. Additionally, romantic partners often offer a sense of stability, friendship, support, love, sexual gratification and companionship. In choosing to stay single, you're limiting certain aspects of your life. Nobody says that just because you're in a relationship that you have to be missing out on anything or acting against your well-being. In fact, I'd advocate the opposite... and I'll leave it at that for now, until Pro responds and I can figure out where she's going with this :) [1] http://www.scienceblog.com...
Staying Single is Better

One of the reasons for staying single is better is that you can afford to wait for your true soul mate. In other words, by holding out for Mr Right , you can avoid the mistake of a lifetime and marry for love -- and not out of desperation. Too many girls get hitched for the wrong reasons, like they've reached a certain age, all of their friends are getting married, and they haven't been successful at dating and this man is the first to show interest. This reason for staying single allows you to take your time playing the dating game, and increase your odds of beating the divorce statistics.
Hockey should be America's past time.

Let's be honest with ourselves, disregarding credibility to any source. Do you actually think hockey is more popular than basketball? Football? Baseball? Let's even throw in track and field and soccer. If hockey has the ability to become a past time, then all the sports I named above should also definitely be American pastimes squared. Hockey does have an appreciation from its fan base do not get me wrong, however, according to sources, football, basketball and baseball are among the top watched and played sports in the U.S. today. Also your argument is flawed since you described why hockey is a harder sport to play rather convincing us why it should receive the prestigious title of a pastime.