Omnipotence is logically unachivable, thus God can't be omnipotent

PRO SAYS: "God, according to the Christian Bible, exists in at least 3 persons. Thus, in theory, a god could self replicate into multiple people, one who cannot lie, and one who can lie like a dog." But if he is able to self replicate in such way, he would be changing its essential nature, and I could argue that he isn't the same God as it was before changing. Imagine the same example I gave with me lifting weight that I cannot lift, I could train changing my nature to be able to lift that weight, but, I wouldn't be the same as before since my nature isn't the same. Let me frame it differently, I can logically imagine a scenario where I truthfully say: There are no omnipotent beings. If God said it truthfully like me, he would not be omnipotent and if he couldn't, he would not be an omnipotent being. PRO SAYS: "Sure you can. In the movie "Predestination", the baby's dna is provided from himself/herself in the future in a time travel paradox." Then, in that pardoxical scenario, he would be his own parent because he gave the dna necesary to create himself/herself. Maybe the examle I gave isn't correct, let me give you another one. God would be able to create water without hydrogen and oxygen on it. PRO SAYS: "2)Pinnochio had no parents, yet Geppetto called him "Son"." Yeah, but that is not a correct use of the word "Son", because even if Geppetto used it, that doesn't make Pinnochio a son, he still has no parents. PRO SAYS: "3)Whatever Darwinian Theory claims, in theory, was the first living organism, technically had no parents." Darwinian theory doesn't talk about the first living being, abiogenesis does. And yes, the first living being didn't have parents, that's why he wasn't a son. For a being to be a son he NEEDS parents, if he doesn't have parents, it would mean that he isn't a son. PRO SAYS: "4)A son can also be adopted, so theoretically, a Pinnochio type character could have no parents, yet be the son of Geppetto" Well that can be fixed by just changing the phrase. "God could create a son that doesn't have and didn't have biological parents". That's just impossible. PRO SAYS: "This logic doesn't follow if God exists in multiple forms or can travel through time. He could be able to lie in 1980 originally, then his future self could go back in time and put limitations on lying on himself." Even if he could do that, I imagined a scenario where I said that no omnipotent beings exist truthfully, God cannot say it truthfully, even if you put time travel and other abilities in the middle. Because if he can say truthfully that no omnipotent beings exist, then it would mean that he isn't omnipotent. PRO SAYS: "In theory, one could argue that omnipotence simply means you cannot die/be destroyed and/or that you are unchangeable. Thus, being "unable to change and/or be destroyed" in and of itself would make one "omnipotent"". If that's your definition, then the Christian God doesn't fit it. For example, in some translations of Jeremiah 26:3 it says that he'll change his mind. In Genesis 18:27-33 Abraham changes God's mind. PRO SAYS: "In another argument, one could say omnipotent simply means to have control over all of reality. Inability to lie would in no way change your control over all of reality" Yes indeed it changes your control of reality. Not having the ability to lie makes you incapable of altering the reality around you in some ways. PRO SAYS: "Technically, God could create multiple realities, one in which he can lie and one in which he cannot." I don't care about which tools he could use to do that. I can stand up and lie without changing my form or altering reality. God cannot lie without changing form or at least in this reality where he cannot, thus, God is not omnipotent because if he was he should be able to tell a lie without altering reality or its form, because that's an action that I can do. __________________________________________________________________________________________ Points I want to make: 1.-Omnipotence isn't logically achivable, you can be very powerfull but never reach the top. 2.-The Christian God has limitations. 3.-Since the Bible is moraly wrong in so many things like Deuteronomy 13:7-11, 18:22-24 or Leviticus 18:22 to name a few, but we are told that god is omnibenevolent (also contradicted in Isaiah 45:6-7) , we reach the conclusion that the Bible has contradictions on it, that maybe signal that there may be other lies like about the omnipotence of God.