Being an immortal "soul" is a possibility

I propose that the idea of an immortal soul is false on 5 grounds.1. The lack of value of immortalityImmortality simply means that one does not die. The notion that a part of a thing doesn't die though the rest of it does has no particular value for the person in question particularly because even if part of them lives on there are no guarantees what happens beyond the rest of them dying. The way I would lay this as an example is simply any given machine that has run it's course; the "soul" could be considerd a tiny cog in that machine, and if that cog is pristine but the rest of the machine is scrap will it be saved? The cog cannot be melted down or distroyed but by no means does that mean it cannot sit at the bottom of the scrapyard for eternity. The entire premise behind there being an immortal soul is that this is not the case and that the soul's value persist beyond death of the body. 2. The lack of value of a soulThe soul is merely an escape mechanism that fundamentally allows one to cheat reality, whether in death or in life, and grants one greater hope even if it is false. A man in prison can still "be free" for instance, a man who is to die soon "can live on", and those who are otherwise enduring duress "have something to look forward to". Also referred to as the font of inner strength the sheer notion of the soul is at best something which gives comfort to others and the self rather tha needing a tangible and observable state of being. Souls are what mediums can use to talk to the dead to calm the living, are what are used to explain unexplainable illnesses and feelings, and ultimately are a crutch to assauge the fears of human life and the limited knowledge had.3. The lack of value of objectivityNeither immortality nor the soul are truly comprehensible. It is convenient since the depictions can vary so widely it's bizarre and yet all be correct and legitimate. One's opinion drives the value of both concepts which in turn means that it's not only subjective to the extreme but outright useless to discuss or harp on when trying to convey what either actually is. In effect one can state that they have out of body experiences commonly and have it equivalent to far rarer near death experiences. The question is simply does that make sense? One can, without any justification, claim they have mastered their soul while another can claim that it was a fluke accident that they "discovered" this ability. Are both people right? Such is madness in any other realm.4. The lack of consistencyIf souls are immortal then how are they born? How are they made? They cannot be destroyed, so it must be cumbersome, this process, since they can only be produced and never destroyed. The "recycled" soul still has this problem; if there were only one soul and it was recycled indefinitely this is not a problem but people claim to have separate souls, so how did they occur? I ask this because if my soul is not your soul and that soul is not someone else's soul are we all simply souls of the past and therefore a continuation of a set number of souls? If so how does population grow? Can population ever truly diminish? Where do these things go and what do these ths do? The fact that there is no static level of population across any given species, regardless of whether it's only humans or all live or all things that exist, causes an unbearable weight on the idea.5. The stability of the delusionArguably most people who believe in souls tend to argue the same arguments for those souls worldwide. This is troubling. The odds are that it's a common delusion are very high based on this concept just as the concept of monsters and ghosts where even cultures that have never interacted with the outside world still believe in such things. The reality is that it's extremely common as a belief no matter one's countries /societies status in the world or even personal status and beliefs. The commonality fundamentally suggests that instead of being something that is unique to the human experience and therefore sensibly ascertainable it's the direct opposite: It's simply a widely held delusion just like many humans are afraid of the dark moreso than the light despite the same dangerous things being either at bay in the modern age or ever present the same.