chickens are cannibals because they eat chicken when you feed them chicken

I am sorry to not respect your biased information about your experiment as it is not true. The chicken and what it says, as in my previous post, said you never asked it anything or gave it a choice. You did not discredit this source, and implicitly accepted it as you responded to giving them a choice which was instigated by the chicken witness. Keeping this in mind, your chickens given the choice for the first time in their life wanted to try something new. Just like teenagers with sex and drugs or cigarettes or whatever crazy thing that is on their mind. So even though other options were there, they ate the chicken because they did not know what it was. You stated that they prefered the chicken, but my witness said that they never had any choices so they took whatever choice you gave them as it might be their only. The did not actually enjoy the chicken meat like you presume they did. The proof of this is in your speech itself, because they did not go kill each other to eat their meat which they would if they were cannibal. So, you stated they preferred chicken over all else but you have no way of knowing that by yourself, and my chicken witness has borne witness against it so that claim is negated. Next, I would like to point out that you have faulty understanding of cannibalism. You are try to manipulate the results to frame your chickens for malicious intent. You said a rapist is a rapist no matter what the excuse, but what you did is restate the previous (ofcourse he is a rapist, you just said he is). What the actual parallel comparison would be is a person who has sex is a rapist, no matter their excuse, and we know that this is not true. People can have sex (action) without being a rapist (noun). Similarly, chickens can eat meat (action) without being cannibals (noun). I will use this comparison as it is more accurate than yours which just restates the same thing. Working off of this, I will explain how your chickens that ate chicken meat are not cannibals. Firstly, you did not notify them that it was chicken meat and that eating of it would make them cannibals. Secondly, the showed no desires of killing each other to eat their meat afterward. Thirdly, as I mentioned way earlier, your small group of chickens is not an appropriate sample to judge all the chickens in the world. Not telling them what they have, combined with the first choice you have given them is the manipulation that you have conducted so that you may blame them, and dishonor the entire species. I previously called this a shameful act, but you failed to apologize for it so you are shameless. Secondly, you said that your chicken did not eat each other afterwards so they were not cannibals. Your example of pecking does not involve your experiment so it is irrelevant and does not prove your case. and thirdly as I said in the 1st round, only your chickens eating meat does not make all chickens cannibals, especially when you manipulated them. So, since your chickens did not know what they ate nor continued to show signs of cannibalism by themselves they are not actually cannibals, but you are just attempting to dishonor them. And more importantly, your little group does not show what all chickens in the world would do, hence you cannot declare them all to 'have a propensity to be cannibals'.