9/11 was an inside job: new perspective.

1. I have no idea why that is neccesary 2. Yes now you understand, this is why a gravity caused collapse wouldnt work... You cannot have it both ways saying on one hand a controlled demolition wouldnt work because there were load bearing walls yet a gravity caused collapse would have worked ."Nano-thermite alone doesn't mean anything for the controlled demolition theory because a thermitic reaction is not controlled enough to cut the steel columns at precise enough angles for controlled demolition."I just provided a link to a device that is meant to cut through steel ."If these were used someone would'be seen them being attatched to the steel columns. Also Linear Thermite Charges were not invented by the government; if you read the patent information you'll see it was invented by people not connected to the government, AND the patent was granted in 2006; 5 years to late."Yes, so what are you arguing that commercial companies are more advanced than DARPA or Los alamos national laboratory?We know that is not true and any commerical device that uses explosives is less advanced than what the military have otherwsie the military would go get it an classify it for national secutiy.The point with this device is that is plausible to use thermitic materials to pulverise and vaporize concrete and steel.-Not the Bush administration, but insiders in bush administraion which included the oil and gas companies, those insiders have been linked to insiders in NIST who investigated 911 but not global warming.-Its not peer reviewed because its not science its a criminal investigation the sources of that investigation are at the bottom of the 911 truth link , however those sources are NOT conspiracy sources... for example one http://www.nytimes.com...;The independent work done is well researched and lays out other suspects for a new criminal investigation, without a new criminal investigation we wont prove who did it will we? Without any investigation no one will be caught so how can you expect me to prove to you who did it ! When I do not when no criminal investigation has taken place . It is like finding a dead body on the street with a bullet whole in the head and you asking me well you dont have proof who did it so therefore he wasnt shot by anyone.The technology to take over the planes was in the pentagon .... not airports, they had the technology to retake control that is why people in the know like Von buelow said the only logical conclusion is that because they didnt retake control of the planes it means they were in control the whole time. The planes did have people and pilots and maybe even the muslims in the plane yet they couldnt do anything as the communications were severed.It is well known that they were waterboarded.Remote control as in computer inputs are more effective than a pilots hand.The terrorists couldnt have access to the planes to damage the system .Yes necessarily unless you believe some arabs without any experience flying jet liners are better pilots than real professionals.NOTE to con , 2 sources were independent Peer reviewed scientific articles in mainstream scientific journals such as the Enviromentalist.One conspiracy source was well researched and had sources such as the NY times