Hiroshima was not nuked

"Leaflets were dropped over cities before they were bombed, warning the inhabitants and urging them to escape the city. Though many, even within the Air Force, viewed this as a form of pychological warfare... Warning leaflets were also dropped on cities not in fact targeted, to create uncertainty and absenteeism." - wikipeadiaThe U.S. leaflet campaign clearly did not intend to minimize the Japanese civilian death toll, and the Japanese civilian population were indiscrimately killed by bombing raids."About 10,000 of the total 200,000 deaths in Hiroshima were military personnel. Nagasaki had no military units and, of the total 140,000 deaths there, only about 150 were military. In total, over 95 per cent of the combined casualties of the two cities were civilian." [4]I'm not debating the enithicality of Nuclear bombing. If things don't make sense its because we are not being told the truth. Why is no-one punished for failing to allow troops to do their job and massacring innocent people? Why weren't military targets bombed instead? I think it is because it is much easier to stockpile explosives in a civilian area and kill civilians, this would make it more believable too. I also think the bombing raids carried out over cities like Tokyo were made to hide the suspicious nature of attacking civilians in Hiroshima wth an atom bomb essentially normalizing the atrocity so people believe it was actually nuked.You say: "While the Japanese Cabinet did approve of the approach to the Soviets, there was no agreement on surrender terms within the government and there was no official discussion of surrender terms until after the dropping of the second atomic bomb." However "When the successful test firing of the first atomic bomb took place on 16 July 1945, Truman, negotiating with the Russians at Potsdam, decided to demonstrate America’s new power to the Soviets by bombing Japanese cities, even though he knew the Japanese were trying to surrender. To ensure the Japanese would not capitulate before the bombs could be used, he deliberately refused to guarantee the emperor’s safety, the only condition which, Alperovitz and others argued, was a sticking-point for the Japanese." [5]The Americans couldn't have dropped two atom bombs to show the Japanese it was pointless to continue fighting - they aong with the Americans knew they had lost and wanted to surrender. The whole thing was staged to intimidate the Russians. President Truman created a myth that 250,000 American lives were saved as a result of atom bombing Japan - the total number of civilians believed to have died from the two bombs. However there is no evidence of any top military planner or major american policy maker thinking that number of American soldiers would be lost if atom bombs were not used. In the worst case scenerio 46,000 American soldiers were predicted to die, possibly as low as 20,000 [6]The decision to nuke Japan to save Americans and end WW2 is simply untrue. It was all about trying to contain Russia via intimidation, therefore it didn't matter whether America had nuked, all that mattered was whether Russia believed the hoax. I'm going to counter the other points now:Below is a photograph of the ruins of Shima Hospital which is said to have been directly below the atom bomb when it exploded. You say that the building behind it seen in the photograph only had to withstand virtical forces, but so did Shima Hospital. And why are those other buildings still standing? It can't be just because they are made of reinforced concrete, there are trees and telegraph poles left standing. The below photograph shows a birds eye view, as you can see there are many buildings that were still standing after the "blast". The damage you can see is caused by incendiary devices. There is no reason at all why an unedited video of the atom bomb dropping from the plane and then exploding could not be filmed. It took 43 seconds to drop. Flying escort with the Enola Gay were two additional planes, and the three planes faced no resistance. The 'Little Boy Bomb' was untested too so you'd expect it to be filmed. In fact video footage does show an arieal view of the atomic bombs exploding, this couldn't have been filmed by Japanese planes as the American bombers faced no resistance. The Japanese did detect three B-29's on their radar but strangely they thought it wasn't worth wasting ammo or fuel, they came to the perculiar conclusion that those three bombers didn't pose a significant threat, so Japanese pilots just stayed on the ground. Radiation is not proof of an atom bomb dropping over Hiroshima. A dirty bomb also known as a radiological dispersal device is likely to have been used, radioactive material is combined with conventional explosives to contaminate an area. Survivors would have talked about the Hiroshima firestorm and the explosion. Do have a source showing eye witnesses seeing a big bomb drop from the sky? There doesn't seem to be any film footage, thankssources:[4] http://www.cnduk.org...[5] http://www.bbc.co.uk...[6] https://books.google.co.uk...[7] http://news.boldride.com...