Jesus cannot be Messiah

My position is that Jesus cannot be Messiah.Genealogical argument: Jesus's pedigree in Matthee\Luke does not coincide with the anticipated Messianic genealogy of the Tanakh.1 Chronicles 28:4-728:4 Howbeit the LORD God of Israel chose me (David) before all the house of my father to be king over Israel for ever: for he hath chosen Judah to be the ruler; and of the house of Judah, the house of my father; and among the sons of my father he liked me to make me king over all Israel: 28:5 And of all my sons, (for the LORD hath given me many sons,) he hath chosen Solomon my son to sit upon the throne of the kingdom of the LORD over Israel.28:6 And he said unto me, Solomon thy son, he shall build my house and my courts: for I have chosen him to be my son, and I will be his father.28:7 Moreover I will establish his kingdom for ever, if he be constant to do my commandments and my judgments, as at this day.The last two verses interpret the meaning of 2 Samuel 7:12-1512 When thy days are fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, that shall proceed out of thy body, and I will establish his kingdom.13 He shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever.14 I will be to him for a father, and he shall be to Me for a son; if he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men;15 but My mercy shall not depart from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee.Solomon is called God's son in 1 Chron 28. Presumably (to my mind) the author of Chronicles was connecting Solomon with Psalm two, which speaks of God's son ruling over the nations (Solomon was said to have ruled over nations). Any Davidic king could implicitly be called God's son, since all are included in 2nd Samuel's intended ambiguity: "he shall be to Me for a son." However, only Solomon is singled out for the explicit title "My son", 1st Chron 28:6. The author of Chronicles was the most messianic author in the Tanakh. To him, all Israel's history was dependent upon the fulfilment of God's promise to David. He reinterpreted the monarchy's past in a more favorable view than the authors of Kings\various Prophets (Jeremiah etc). He wanted to counter the anticipated notion of the returning exiles: "well, what a waste of time that Davidic monarchy bit," and reaffirm the messianic fervor of the past with the returning exiles.I believe the train of thought that wrote Chronicles, was the final redaction phase of the Tanakh.I posit that Solomon must be the anticipated genealogical connection with David to whom the Messianic covenant was given. Thus all the Jewish folklore surrounding the Messiah as a "man of wisdom' like Solomon.Problems for the Christian: Luke's gospel (Luke 3:31) links Jesus's pedigree to David's son Nathan (Solomon's brother).Matthew's gospel links Jesus's pedigree to Solomon, but it contains Jeconiah in the genealogy, Matt 1:12.Jeconiah and his descendants are excluded from the Messianic equation, Jeremiah 22:30.Prophetical context argument: Any prophecy applied to Jesus's first advent has better contextual logic ( in the Tanakh) of being applied to an event or person that preceded him.Side note: I threw my mezuzah away ten years ago, but I can still see the imprint of where it was.I will never regret my conversion, even though I have long since lost my faith.Judaism, in spite of its many quirks, taught me one thing: if something doesn't make sense, then the hell with it. Sometimes in my desire for numinous, I look at the mezuzah print outside my door. I gaze it and wonder if I should return. Then I think of its many quirks and say, "to hell with it."