The Universe is a Collective Conciousness.

What a detail heavy debate! Let us soldier on. I concede that there is no empirical evidence of particles having consciousness. That's why my argument is strictly epistemological. It could never be more than a hypothesis without some seriously robust science attached to it. Such feats are beyond me. Also, I don't think particles have positions, But rather super positions because they exist within a give possibilities of states of affairs, Only choosing one when interacted with. This is why particles never stop moving. I guess if I'm being thorough, I should bring entropy and heat death into this. While entropy is technically proven by theory, It requires that the universe has a certain state of affairs and these variables are outside the reach of the observable universe. Therefore, With our current technology, Cosmological heat death is no more provable than this debate topic. I'm not sure of what it should really be called, I'm already way off on a slippery slope even being here. The harmony thing would have to explain consciousness in beings. That's the whole implication of the conclusion. . The conclusions show that it is extremely likely that consciousness never truly stops existing. It probably isn't anything like our current experience, But the implications are worth exploring. I have to be clear on this one. I am NOT suggesting that humanities consciousness is connected. What I am purposing is that particles with more primitive consciousnesses, Come together to form a collective. The collective is in the individual, Not society. If you really think about it, The body really is a kind of hive mind. As a fun thought experiment, Contemplate this question: Are humans one lie, Or a super structure of smaller lives? I think this question helps to show that this hypothesis of mine is not entirely without merit. At the very least, It's logically compelling. I kind of like the example about the rotting corpse. Never thought I'd say that sentence with sincerity. It kind of drove at the concept I was getting at. I want to add that the concept can be reduced further by thinking of each particle as a piece of consciousness. So I'm not talking about reincarnation. New beings formed from the particles of old beings probably wouldn't transfer any old experience with it. These experiences probably would have been in the memories of their old brain. So the particles used to form the new collective are arbitrary in terms of personality or memories. On the NASA thing, There's actually some studies to suggest that brainless beings, Like bacteria and amoebas do have consciousness. It's not fancy like ours, But probably closer to the example I gave earlier. In the experiments. They place the organisms in various situations that allowed them to makes choices in their environment for survival rewards like food. The organisms were able to memorize paths to the good spots in their environment and at very least can navigate paths. I believe they did the experiments with amoebas. Matter and Energy are not alive by scientific standards. But what if our standards for life don't properly exclude consciousness? Think about it. Hypothetically, A being could have consciousness, But have no way to communicate, On a human level at least. Such a being would seem dead to us. What if a rock could sense us, But it simply can't move or present the effect of stimuli? I'm a tad hyperbolic in my example. This would be a good time to point out that my hypothesis does not require every particle in the universe to have life. I thought it was in my premises, But I might have only put it in the reformed one in the comments. I suspect that the bosons are the most likely candidates for consciousness. Now about Energy. Some types of energy exist, But not all of them. The only types of energy that exists are certain particles. I could be wrong, But I believe it's every particle in the boson group. In the end. I really only have enough for an inductive argument. But that's not nothing. We may have prematurely exhausted our content here. What do you think?