One World Government

While it is natural for humans to live together many oppose mega countries as "united states of Europe", the Eurosceptism in Europe is increasing in many of the countries within the union with UK being one of the "nations" with the lowest trust in EU. Which makes it problematic as UK is along with Germany and France the driving members. "Also I would like to point out that countries like the Roman Empire did not die out because they decided to brake up into smaller countries but because of an outside force causing issues" That is only a part of the truth, while the Germanian tribes was the final demise for the Roman empire the reason it fell was much deeper than that. Corruption and divided wills helped also to end the empire. http://www.rome.info... Trough out the decades empires have risen and fallen, the latest was the soviet union which suffered greatly of corruption and a big unrest throughout the union, and also with an extreme military spending the union crashed. If you look at many former Soviet countries they got places like "victory square, independence square" and so on which many places came when they were free from Soviet oppression. This leads us back to EU, it has been shown with the debts and crisis emerging during the latest years that they got some really fundamental problems while the support for the union is steadily decreasing. http://www.europeanvoice.com... "China and the easter asian countries will unite so they maintain there power in the evolving world." Perhaps if we talk in hundreds of years, but I have a hard time thinking China would ever need to join a union to keep up in advancements, they almost got 20% of the world populations, and in short term the only way I see old enemies like Japan and Taiwan to join is to be militarily annexed which of course would start a war with USA. " The way that I vision the government working is similar to americas with the exemption that the presidential candidates will be anonymous this way it prevents the countries with the biggest population to monopolize the presidential spot." While that is a good vision it's still just a vision. Money corrupts and money wins elections, and guess who got the money. If we look at USA the candidates and parties spend billions of dollars for their campaigns, something a majority of people won't afford. I also think you underestimate the differences of people that live in different countries, nothing say a law that people love in one province is loved in other provinces as well. Just look at North Ireland, there were decades of bombings and shootings because people had different opinions and believes(simplified). " Another solution is that the house elects the president to try making it more equal. I know that this is far from happening but I strongly believe that if the human race wants to survive this is the direction that the world needs to move in." That means they will choose the president that is best for everyone and not for themselves. And sadly there will always be power hungry humans. Taken from your link "I am sure people will say no to this centralist fanaticism." Mrs Reding's comments illustrate the growing gulf between a Europe committed to "ever closer union" and Britain, which is pushing to reduce the EU's powers." "We assume Britain's leaving the EU so we don't even bother thinking about British sensitivities at the moment," said an official." (The "check your spelling" didn't work so Im again sorry for spelling errors and other things) Good luck