Facebook is just a phase that will lose popularity

I will begin by thanking Con for his points and rebuttal.Decline:Firstly, my opponent made an accurate observation that TIME's 50 Best Websites 2010 did not recycle any of the websites from the 2009 list. However, both lists show several other popular social media and social networking sites. Additionally, my opponent's request of "Pro, could you offer some evidence to support the claim that Tumblr and LinkedIn will take over Facebook?" is out of context. I stated in Round 2 that "Other social networking sites such as Tumblr and LinkedIn are already beginning their coup to overthrow Facebook." I merely stated two websites of the top 5 Social Media sites on TIME's 2010 list [1]. In January 2010, only 50% of Facebook's active users log in each day. In March 2011, this statistic remained true [2].During the same time period, Flickr's active users increased 25% and now holds over 5 billion images [2]. Also, Twitter increased 233% in registered users, while Facebook increased only 183% [2]. Twitter also saw a 250% increase in the number of tweets per day [2]. Twitter now sees more tweets per day than there were in the entire month of April 2011 [4]. Furthermore, growing slowly yet steadily, LinkedIn has grown 100% in registered users [2]. Bebo is the second largest social networking site in the U.K. and continues to grow [3]. Clearly, there are quite a few contenders for Facebook's throne.TrendsIn response to Con's request regarding Facebook following MySpace's footsteps, I have already provided evidence in Round 2. Though, if it is still unclear or unsubstantial to my opponent, I would be happy to clarify. I stated earlier that MySpace had a 13-year run. Facebook was launched in 2004 [5]. 5 years from now, within which time I predict Facebook's downfall, it will have had a 12-year run. Several years before its downfall, MySpace formed its "Joint Music Venture" and made a few desperate attempts to keep users interested [6]. Facebook did similar actions such as launching FriendFeed and Places [5]. I restate that MySpace and Facebook follow similar tracks.Regarding Con's comments on the security of MySpace, I will begin by conclusively stating that I will not be defending MySpace in any way, nor do I want the topic of the debate to shift toward MySpace. That being said, I don't see how my opponent's provided link helps to promote his viewpoints. myspace.com scored a rating of Good or Excellent in all 4 categories of security. In anticipation of my opponent's rebuttal that the ratings should be seen for their specific numerical values, I question the accuracy of the numerical ratings, for the "Worth of Trust" website itself did not receive a perfect score in 'Trustworthiness' nor 'Vendor reliability' [7]. Additionally, the specific link provided by Con does not address, compare, or present the security ratings for facebook.com, and is therefore useless to this debate. I have now addressed all of my opponent's requests, rebuttals, and statements. I look forward to the remainder of Round 3. [1] http://www.time.com... [2] http://econsultancy.com... [3] http://socialmediastatistics.wikidot.com... [4] http://blog.twitter.com... [5] http://www.facebook.com... [6] http://www.stepforth.com... [7] http://www.mywot.com...