jesus never stated one single, not one word about being gay nor transgender.

"You are wrong in the sense that I do not believe in anything in regards to the Old Testament." Oh no, I am absolutely 100% correct in stating that because you as a supposed christian, in which there is no such a thing (you did not even pay any attention to the video posted, naturally because you are a true coward and no offense, but I"m really getting sick and tired of maggots like you that totally avoid any evidence when it is directly posted to them, so you, let"s do the reverse and since I do not believe in your god, I should have the right, playing by his rules in reverse have every right to murder you. "As I have mentioned multiple times, the events described in the Old Testament did transpire." Oh really? According to what *yawn boring boredom which bores a boring bore" imbecile you? "The law of the Old Testament is what we are no longer bound by." There---for---the---last---time---is---no---law. You just cannot pick and choose what YOU and ONLY YOU want to nitpick at and pick the good stuff and hug and cuddle with it and chuck the bad stuff out and take a giant leak on it. Also what you are stating is that your god changed in a major way. Because he was a hard a$$ in the OT and murdered people for no reason, hated children of all things and murdered them for no reason, wanted to execute those that broke the sabbath, those that did not believe in him, those that cursed at their parents (in which carried over to YOUR NT so don"t talk to me about YOUR law you miserable oafing cow), those that blasphemed, those that committed adultery etc etc etc. This god of YOURS also committed horrific genocides for 0 reasons, hates women, murdered innocent pregnant women which is abortions in which you so-called christians are so against which is a super massive hypocritical contradiction so YOU go against YOUR god, loves raped women etc etc etc, This god suddenly changed from being evil, anger, wrath, vengeance, rage, fury, jealousy, all in which he freely admitted to having, he suddenly changed into this super cool dude white rabbit and not having them anymore in the NT? Hmmm Yeah. Right. "The flood and Noah's ark are not part of the law, I'm not sure how you mixed those up." WHAT LAW??? See you cannot present one god damned f--king thing and I"m really getting sick of it. Oh and oh yeah, one historic event that NEVER occurred. This thus proves that YOUR god flat out lied, and that YOUR bible is filled with lies. "and the other refers to rules that God's chosen people had to follow." And since they were so ridiculous and truly impossible to follow, nobody did, BUT, those laws are still intact because nobody changed them AND nobody had the power to change them, AND god gave nobody the power to change them. "I also do not have the time to watch 40 minutes of debating, " Oh but you do have the time to compose 40 minutes worth of hogwash for something in which you clearly know nothing about. So what do you do instead is you flat out invent excuses, without taking a look at any true evidence whatsoever. And don"t hand me this bile crap that you don"t have 40 minutes when the first and only video posted in RD2 is only 6 and " minutes proving that in no possible way are you a christian whatsoever. Invent better excuses please. Then you continue because you don't know any better in which is really infuriating "You asked "who approved that so-called 'law'? And what 'law'?". I was referring to the abolishment of the old law through Jesus. Well jesus, =in not being god, did not have the right, nor the power to do as such. There's no such a thing as the "trinity". Period. "which is called the trinity [23]." 23 what? Jesus doesn't need permission to do anything, because He is God " Oh how wrong you are. But then again, you cannot even read YOUR BIBLE. John 5:7 "And there are three that bear witness in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." It does no good to claim that "Let us" is the magisterial "we." Such usage implies inclusivity of all authorities under a king's leadership. Invoking the Trinity solves nothing because such an idea is more contradictory than the problem it attempts to solve Now here's a few verses from YOUR bible CLEARLY showing that YOUR jesus, in which you have 0% proof of even existing, just like YOUR god, was NOT god, but the SON of god, thus making them TWO separate entities in which YOU cannot argue with. * 1 Corinthians 15:28 "And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all." * Matthew 3:17 "And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. * Mark 1:11 "And there came a voice from heaven, saying, Thou art my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." * John 1:14 "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth." * 1 John 4:10 "Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins." * John 14:13 "And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son." * Mark 5:7 "And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not." * Luke 8:28 "When he saw Jesus, he cried out, and fell down before him, and with a loud voice said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God most high? I beseech thee, torment me not." * Luke 3:22 "And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased." * 2 Peter 1:17 " For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." "John 10:30 states "I and the Father are one"" So? Who is this conceited little brat who---self---appointed---HIMSELF---to---this---position? I mean if he did it, then there's no reason why you can't do it. And the same is true for the rest of the world. 2 Peter 1:1 states "by the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ"." Well by golly gosh darned gee whiz, god did not in any way state that now did he? Um nope. So why did you mention it? Hebrews 1:2 "2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;" AND WHO STATED THIS? IT'S not GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 peter 2: 21-22 is a complete joke. Um no. There is no such a thing as anyone or anything SUFFERING for me. That's totally ridiculous. AND even worse is this god of yours, in which you cannot even prove even exists, creating one single idiot to supposedly suffer for all of man. AND your religion teaches the beginning of suffering. Buddhism teaches the end of suffering. Oh gee, I just cannot imagine which I or any sane person would choose. Not only that what are children expected to learn of someone's suffering and or their suffering except for NOTHING you total dolt? And you REALLY think that a supreme deity couldn't have thought of a better way for a so-called salvation in which also, naturally cannot be proved? YOU are totally ridiculous for yourself to try to sell that crap to me or anyone who happens to be intelligent and educated into believably. "We" are nowhere near as tragically gullible as you that would fall for ---anything--- that is put in front of their face. If I was to show up at your doorstep tomorrow and were to tell you that I was your jesus, pass all of your questions, and I know I would with ease, because you are so ridiculously blind AND whole wheat gullible beyond belief AND you also go into global thermal meltdown denial,, AND I were to order you that you MUST get rid of all of your possessions and dump your family why by gum, you'd do it it a heartbeat to the closest slaughterhouse because those were my prerogatives from 2,000 years ago, which is in your bible, and then naturally I'd order you to follow me, and the only question I'd have for you is why you haven't done those things already because they are things I've already ordered you to do in your bible, so why haven't you done them yet? "If Jesus did violate the Sabbath, then He sinned." There is no "if". HE DID. Wow. you cannot even read. "This is false because we know that He lived a perfect, sinless life" Who is this "we" Um no, its YOU. Only YOU. Idiot. Luke 6:10 "And looking roundabout upon them all, he said unto the man, Stretch forth thy hand. And he did so: and his hand was restored whole as the other." Your jesus worked on the sabbath. Second, in Luke 6:5 Jesus states "The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath". Jesus can do anything He pleases regarding the Sabbath." WRONG! YOUR god DID NOT AUTHORIZE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM for your jesus to break hs laws. And as proved above, YOUR god AND jesus ARE two separate entities. The jews ARE correct, YOU are incorrect. What you are saying is that the ENTIRE OT is wrong RIGHT THERE and that the entire jewish religion is false and that ONLY you is correct. YOUR jesus CANNOT go around and break one of the most divine commandments of all time. Moses certainly couldn't, and jesus WAS NOT GIVEN AUTHORIZATION!!!. Oh I get it also, so you really expect me or anybody who knows one goddamned f--king thing about god that since this jesus character is going to work on the sabbath, that this god is now going to break his commandment and NOT rest on the seventh day and actually work on it? ARE YOU F---KING SERIOUS? I"m not even going to pay attention to anymore of your stupid idiotic flatly invented excuses. Lastly here's a video to prove you wrong as usual. Yep, its got the the sabbath in it. http://www.youtube.com... - top 10 reasons why the bible is repulsive