Replacing private cars with Aerodynes.

1) You havent argued against Mass production and its cost redcution abilities, but you have argued against Moller international. They are still working and developing more products: http://finance.yahoo.com...http://finance.yahoo.com...;Also: NASA´s Puffin http://www.youtube.com...;(Discovery Channel)Some more developments/actual prototypeshttp://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...;http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...;(still developing/researching)2) I have no idea what these sky roads are. Please elaborate. Fly-by-wire Planes are not hard to operate: http://en.wikipedia.org...Also, simpler controls are literally Fly-by-wire systemshttp://en.wikipedia.org...The Heading Indicator and the CDI can be fusedThe Magnetic compass is not needed as you already have a compassThe Turn indicator can be incorparated into the Attitude IndicatorThe Vertical Speed Indicator can be intergrated into the Altitude meterThis makes much less instruments to look at, some instruments have multiple functions. Even without the changes it is still not a complicated system.3) I think i didnt explain correctly, Grounded AI systems work together with the Fly-by-wire to fly the aircraft safely untill the destination has been reached.4) People can also do their shopping in Aerodynes. I dont understand how the argument has been "dropped" by me.5) Commercial transports that are also Cars can still be used, trucks too. The automobile industry wont just flop around and die like a fish out of water. Replacing Privately owned cars, not commercial transports, my mistake if that wasn´st clear.6)There are people stationed in a hospital. This has to do with public transportation, and nothing to do with aerodynes so why are you saying "fly"? I also don´t understand why people are using buses/subways (whatever public transportaion you prefer) as transportation when they own a aerodyne.7) There would be no point in my idea if you just use pure Fly-by-wire. Manual controls still exist. If you dont like dangerous flyers not being grounded after some dangerous movements around other aircraft, I dont understand you.Why would the police have to walk or bike?8) Your point was that aircraft make it easy for terrorists to terrorize, my point was so do cars. I hope you understand now.9)Imaginary and non existant?http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...10)http://en.wikipedia.org...(aircraft)http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...http://en.wikipedia.org...Dont be silly. -------------------------------------------------------------Length of transition: We both agree that this will take a long time, there is no argument.Freedom: Fly by wire doesnt have to be absolute, it is essentially only needed in bad weather and ubran areas.New roads: http://askville.amazon.com..., in short: 1.3 billion for a three mile extension on a highway. Others agree on hundreds of thousands to millions. The New Resons:1)This is being debated already in other arguments.2)Roads are not needed to coordinate traffic.3)Electricity is cheap, with maintainance i assume you mean repairing the (insert automobile/aircraft part). This is expensive in cars and aircraft, and will be cheaper with Mass production of various parts. (depending on the part of course).4)Once again, Fly.By.Wire.5)I am not relying on that company it was just an example.