The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance.

Burdens - Part of the speech act is the plan, i.e in the 1AC when I said "I think it's imperative that:' - it also accesses the solvency mechanism under Sylvain 14. Whenever we end these corporate ties spun so largely - people are able to spin movements such as all three of the Ks. The AFF is a pre-requisite to each of the alternatives. Mini O/V - Corporations will co-opt all of these, specifically: Queer Theory: Remember the gay marriage decision, and how straight cis males and straight cis females put the rainbow flag on their profile pictures? And all of the shirts made in response to this? Corporations will enact themselves to be like "Oh hey, the people want this! Lets decide to exploit this!" Antiblackness - They conceded the Willoughby Herard ev, talking about the Carnegie Corporation - a corporation who had an interest to franchise in governing, and in specific indirect ways (also answers back to cap) when people advocated for black education, Carnegie used a bully pulpit of philanthropy to legitimate racial capitalism. It also fostered a devotion to an oligarchic class, culture, social relations, and interests - all without claiming the antagonisms / aspirations of the WORKING classes / those who labored without the status of worker. Capitalism - Surveillance is the key mechanism of control of consumers - that the capitalist state DEPENDS upon the greatest extraction of a surplus value from production, of course when the objective is to assess undesirable behavior such as the alternative. That's my Campbell / Carlson 2 card. Extinction impacts link back to Queer Theory- Edelman says a little about the state, but he says : when using X to propagandize the Nuclear Family (hetero-normative family) through enactments of fearing death or extinction that creates some hope that oppresses the queer. Case- They don't answer Zuboff correctly - Zuboff talks about how when we act against the State using theoretical attacks, the State will manipulate each of the persons, coercing them (also a part of Lehn with corporations) and forcing them to comply with the law. This means that the AFF has to come first, otherwise the impacts of the K will be repressed. The We the People DA more specifically answers A/B and the colonial impact of the 1NC. Corporations are used as tools to exploit black people and natives. Specifically, in 1787 you had to be a WHITE MALE with PROPERTY (slave, more specifically) JUST to be able to vote. Companies were also used as charters to exploit the Native people perpetrating the social death and life that they lack today. Any of this are caused specifically by corporations being 'people'. --- Framework: My framework actually impact turns the Ks, lets start off on: Symbolic - So they conceded the main point of the Weeks arg, a solvency mechanism inherent to the AFF. It mobilizes the struggle for others in the future - that includes all of their people specified in their Ks, and many Other out there. Tangible Focus Points - They conceded this part of the framework - you should view this a lot more. Education is simply blackmail by the State - whenever we actually take time to explain the discourse of why you should view the speech act as something much less benign than all of the affirmatives you actually have grassroots reforms - also we access fiat: their cards that they talk about link level [Meszaros and Zinn] that we're actually able to go through the courts? Also, Sylvain talks about when either corporate or state acts the people are able to recognize this. That went conceded from the last speech. Answer to education- they say they'll be silenced if you pass the 1AC, no. Corporations are currently SILENCING these bodies, because they control the flow of data. This means the AFF is an impact turn to education, and that's Lehn. C/A any other education based impacts from the other flows. --- Permutation: Connolly - Connolly avoids any of the links because corporate neoliberalism exacerbates hidden vulnerabilities within several lines of flight to reverb in case of rejecting the state or burning the courts. Instead you should identify multiple sites of potential action because a revision in political ideology will reshape the status quo. The impact of the permutation is a new leftist fascism that cedes hegemonic disasters such as: "extinction, market abstractions are what we become (no value to any life), war, exploitation of natives, poverty, black flesh becoming worthless, rectifying bad power structures, freedom lost for black people, soul murder, a new holocaust ...." and the impacts of the 1AC (last speech) .. i,e the impact of the K alone is simply it's own repression because the followers become cynical and act as if they are the new state. Them saying that this doesn't avoid their links just simply skews out alternative solvency - their theorization does nothing, as Connolly specifically indicts this theorization, and says that CONCRETE inter-rim strategies are the only way to solve. --- Capitalism - Chong: Chong specifically talks about how corporate interests are put into the desirability of data and accessibility. Otherwise, we have to change this cramped legal understanding. Campbell / Carlson - Look above. --- Antiblackness- Willoughby-Herard (w/ combination of Chomsky) look above for the Willoughby-Herard explanation: They indict Chomsky saying he's an anarchist but that doesn't answer ANY OF THE CARD. The card specifically says: "So you have to make use of the state, all the time recognizing that you ultimately want to eliminate it" -- although he's an ANARCHIST he recognizes the State - although terrible; MUST BE USED. --- QT- Case works as the permutation, and again: make them prove more than just a state link. Otherwise, it's all blackmail that serves the purpose of the State and not their movements. --- Specific: Cap - So tell me, how does getting rid of corporate surveillance specifically reentrench cap? What if I used a different solvency mechanism? Actually no, I took the time to research Kovel: Kovel doesn't answer much about the courts or the state at all. Go ahead an c/a Chomsky on this: private powers are much worse. THEY CONCEDE THEMBA NIXON AND PUT THIS ON ALL OF THEIR FLOWS: WE HAVE TO GIVE POLICY MOVEMENTS BEFORE ANY OF THESE: THE K WON'T GO PAST THIS DEBATE SPACE UNLESS : "Making policy work an integral part of organizing will require a certain amount of retrofitting. We will need to develop the capacity to translate our information, data, and experience into stories that are designed to affect the public conversation. Perhaps most important, we will need to move beyond fighting problems and on to framing solutions that bring us closer to our vision of how things should be" ALSO THEY CONCEDE GIBSON GRAHAM - THEIR UNIFICATION OF CAPITALISM PROVIDES IT AS THIS MONOLITHIC FIGURE ALLOWING IT TO REJUVENATE ITSELF. THIS IS AN INDEPENDENT DA TO THE ALTERNATIVE BECAUSE IT'S IMPERVIOUS TO PAST REFORMS, AND ALLOWS FOR ANTIBLACKNESS AND QUEER VIOLENCE HAPPENS They also concede that they exclude other violence - the AFF with the K is a lot better. --- A/B - They conceded my Sunstrom 8 card: this is a turn on the K specifically: the focus on A/B skews the interests only to the white elite who already control this scheme of information. That the future will not be solely determined by BLACK AND WHITE politics that the alternative creates. They concede Hooks 96: the ultimate pessimism of the alternative leads to the fatalist and hopeless of those who put themselves in the movement. It props up white supremacy and makes every one of us complicit in spreading the antiblack notions. We have to collectively renew our commitment to a vision of racial equality, which leads me to my Omi & Winant card: The present prospects of racial justice are demoralizing - conditions have changed, yes, but these formations happened under the guise of political mobilizations such as the AFF. Further victories are only allowed through the permutation. Also, they drop the specific indict of their Sexton card: their alternative is VAGUE, and only writes ad hominem attacks - also ignores the HISTORY of racialized development. --- QT - He didn't read my Johnson card. It doesn't say that omitting POC props WhiSup - in QT many LGBTQ+ theorize in the politics of identity, but get grounded in essentialism and dissolves the identity of queers. Just because you say you go for A/B solves for this card really just worsens it for the black body and the queers together. They conceded Kirsch - the decentering of identity provides an overwhelming narrative emphasizing individual resistance that reinforces the same narrative. Queer politics aren"t a root cause " focus on reproductive futurism can"t explain gay oppression in family life, consumerism, mass culture or religion. Accepting the multiple intersections underscores the necessity of working through political institutions to achieve change. Yes, people in the squo use multiple binaries, but specifically the hetero v non-hetero binary oppresses the non-hetero reinforcing queer violence because it easily allows the HETERO to see the non-hetero and oppress them. None of the affirmative provides for the Nuclear Child's life or reproductivity, so no link. --- AFF SOLVES THE K: They just say the problems have to be stopped now, but what does rejecting the state in the face of the affirmative do? You should view the AFF as an impossible demand that concrete utopian demands necessitate. [Underview] They concede most of my stuff and ignore all of the clash I provide. I hope the explanation and further reading of these cards help, Chomsky overrides the State bad links. I apologize for the wait, and thank you. Note: Anti-blackness isn't meant to be read with other things typically but I can see how the Farley ev works lol