(Pro) Atheistic evolution vs creationism (con)

First, I will built up evolution and other atheistic natural processes. Second, I will show why Christian creationism is an extremely unlikely scenario. Finally, I will merge the two and show how atheistic evolution is a much more likely scenario than creationism. From my point of view the origins of the universe are in this order. Multi-verse theory, big bang theory, abiogenesis, and evolution. The universe formed from another universe, and thus the multi-verse theory. A big bang or a series of big bangs occurred creating the galaxies and solar systems, including Earth. Despite a series of big bangs or a single big bang being mutually exclusive they both reinforce my argument. Just at there are multiple multi-verse theories. Each one supporting my argument, despite being mutually exclusive. Next, abiogenesis again, multiple ways this event could of occurred, all of which are scientific. I will only use Darwin's theory of evolution. Note, there are again multiple ways in which certain characteristics could have occurred like photosynthesis, yet each one reinforces the hypothesis of Darwin's theory of evolution. Based upon the evidence for Darwin's theory of evolution, I think it is the correct series of event. There are four main lines of evidence for evolution. [0]A. Fossil evidenceB. HomologiesC. Distribution in time and spaceD. Evidence by exampleThe fossil evidence for evolution is particularly impressive. [1]I don't want to spend too much time reiterating common scientific facts, therefore I will focus on obliterating creationism. Since my opponent has graciously shown that he is Christian, I will focus on Christian creationism. Since he will most likely be defending from this point of view as opposed to a Native American religion or Hindu religion point of view. Why Christian Creationism is falseIf you read the Bible you will know according to the scriptures the Earth is flat, 6,000 or so years old, and the solar system is geocentric. In sharp contrast most scientists state that the Earth is spherical in shape, over five billion years old, the Earth and Sun revolve around the barycenter of the solar system. Next, there is the obscenity in the Bible. Without getting into too much detail, understand the Bible should be rated x and sold at Adult Bookstore. Then, there is the morals of the Bible. If you read Drunk with Blood it will be difficult to think the God of the Old testament is moral. [2] Since most Christians accept that the God of the Old Testament is the God of the New Testament, a person can only conclude that Jesus performed the genocides in the Old Testament. One key example is Noah's Ark. A story about God committing genocide against the entire world, except for Noah and a few others. This include many animals. Jesus comes to the rescue in the New Testament with Eternal Damnation. Making Jesus even more malevolent than his father. Both Gods, The Father and the Son approve of slavery. "20 And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he [is] his money. " [3]"“Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;” " [4]Then, there is the contradictions in the Bible. [5] Finally, there is the impossible scenarios in the Bible. For example, Jonah staying alive for three days and three nights in the belly of a great fish. Noah's Ark not being ocean worthy, let alone for a year. [6]Conclusions, on one hand we have the vigorous scientific method that scientists from around the world and from many different races and religions have competed to find the truth, and an enormous amount of empirical evidence to back up evolution. On the other hand we have a series of old books that tell us the world if flat, 6,000 years old, the Earth is stationary, that contains obscenity, with a genocidal character who condemns people to infinite punishments for finite crimes, promotes slavery, full of impossible scenarios, contradictions, and with no empirical evidence to support these extremely unlikely claims. There can only be one answer, and that answer is evolution. Thanks for reading. I put a lot of effort into this round, I hope you reciprocate in kind. Sources0. . http://evolution.berkeley.edu...1. . http://evolution.about.com...2. . http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...3. . http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...4. . http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...5. . http://www.thethinkingatheist.com...6.