Evolution/Big Bang Atheism vs Creation by God

PRO's Initial Argument "I believe that scientific facts, laws, evidence and logic support Creation by God and completely destroy the Evolution/Big Bang theory." I will give a (very) short summary of the Big Bang theory, along with supporting scientific evidence, and give the floor back to PRO. Next round I will defend all points given and counter all of PRO's points. The Big Bang Theory Obligatory reminder: The Big Bang theory does not state the universe came from nothing The known universe had humble beginnings. A single, unfathomably hot and dense point, and upon expansion, the exponential energy created quarks and leptons, the most elementary particles of existence. The heat and energy combined with these building blocks would eventually lead to nucleosynthesis, and pave the way for the creation of light isotopes. This would eventually lead to stellar nucleosynthesis that would form the heavier elements within stars, this would provide the opportunity for life. An incredibly simplistic version of the theory, more can be read below: http://books.google.nl... http://www.nytimes.com... We can support this theory with the following: Cosmic Background Radiation - a faint glow left over from the Big Bang, and supports the idea that the universe expanded from a single point, and condensed into galaxies and clusters. http://www.cfa.harvard.edu... Type Ia Supernovas - the measurement of distant binary systems that aided in our discovery that the universe is expanding and accelerating. http://arxiv.org... Particle Physics - which can mimic the conditions and parameters of the Big Bang in experimentation. http://home.web.cern.ch... Big Bang Nucleosynthesis - the formation of lighter isotopes. http://www.einstein-online.info... Hubble's Law - Expanded understanding of observable universe and supports Big Bang model. http://astronomy.swin.edu.au... http://www.pnas.org... Redshift and spectroscopy - observation of expansion and light elements http://www.schoolsobservatory.org.uk... http://www.ipac.caltech.edu... Abundance of primordial elements - the predicted (large) amount of light elements, hydrogen, helium, deuterium, lithium, matches that of the Big Bang theory. http://www.einstein-online.info... http://www.astronomynotes.com... Dating back the stellar evolution of globular clusters to the beginning of the known universe. http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu... Radiometric dating of population II stars. http://astro.berkeley.edu... Oldest White Dwarf - supporting the predicted age of the known universe http://www.astro.ucla.edu... In the 1970's the majority of the scientific community accepted the Big Bang as the answer to our questions, and it's increased ever since. Generations of scientists with increasingly powerful tools and more precise experimentation have not been able to come up with a serious problem with the theory, or come up with a better one. By no means does this imply that one should agree simply because of majority consensus, but the overwhelming majority of experts in the field agree with a theory, it offers support to it's dependability. A helpful video that simplifies the theory with non-scientific explanations for the curious: #t=51 Conclusion All of this scientific evidence not only supports the Lambda-CDM (standard) model of the Big Bang theory, but suggests it. Our math, observable evidence, and experimentation all is mutually supportive with one another and fits with incredible accuracy an event that happened billions of years ago. PRO must explain how all of this evidence not only supports the divine creator narrative of the Christian God, but also how it disproves the Big Bang theory. The floor is PRO's