The Bible is right.

I'll go through your points in the same order. A. Conflicting Genealogies He was adopted by Joseph who was by blood the heir to the throne. Jesus had it both ways. Mary and Joesph were related if you did not know. The reason Mary was not mentioned was because she is a woman and typically are not mentioned in genelogies only males. B. Is Jesus Equal to God To man they are equal for there is only one God to man and that is Jesus. Jesus is equal to God the Father to us. But He is God's only begotten son and therefore God the Father is greater. No contradition. C. Which came first, beast or man? 19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. Here it is not providing that beast were formed in chapter 2. But it simply says God formed them from the ground(past tense or present tense)No contradiction. D. Human conception? He was concieved by the Holy Ghost. Also Jesus is descended to David through both Joesph(not blood but adoption) and Mary. Mary and Joesph were related, both are from the tribe of Judah. E. Punish the son for the sins of the father? "Parts of the Bible (and my opponent) say that the son should NOT be punished for the sins of the father." I never said no such thing. I said the guilty should be punished, and rightly so these people were guilty both from father and son. All the generations did as the fathers and God knew that. read: KJV-R (Webster) Joshua 7:20 And Achan answered Joshua, and said, Indeed I have sinned against the LORD God of Israel, and thus and thus have I done: KJV-R (Webster) Isaiah 14:20 Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned. 21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities. No contradition. F. Jesus' Last Words "Scotty claims that all three authors were at the Crucifixion and "heard" different things." Again I never said no such thing. I said this is what they heard I did not say were. As so they have differnet interpretations from different sources. This also does not prove Jesus didnt say all the things they mention in these verses. No Contradition. G. Can God Be Seen I did answer it, you did not understand, Ill make it plain. You can see Jesus. You can't see the Holy Ghost and God the Father. Moses saw Jesus. And Jesus said you can not see God the Father or Holy Ghost in the NT. No contradition. I. Michal's children Dropped=Not dropped Michal's sister, Merab, married Adriel the Meholathite (1 Samuel 18:19), and it was Adriel's children that, according to 2 Samuel 21:8, belonged to Michal and were "brought up" by Michal. We know that Michal had no children, but we will probably always be uncertain of what role (if any) Michal played in the rearing of the children of Adriel. A. Hares don't chew cud "This still hasn't been refuted. My opponent claims Hebrew has a different context, but then proves that in this context, the passage does mean "cud." No that means we call cud differnet than they did. Nothing more. No contradition. B. Snails melt My opponent's explanation is also wrong. The Hebrew word here is temec, and this is the only place where it appears in the Bible. The main meaning here is liquefaction, with a root in a word referring to dissolution. All agree that slugs and snails leave a trail behind as they move -- this is not something that is hard to observe or unknown. C. Snakes only eat dirt "[1] Lastly, in Genesis 3:14, God condemns the snake to eat nothing but dirt. This is obviously untrue." KJV-R (Webster) Genesis 3:14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: Where does it say that only dirt? It says he will intake dust all his life but does not say only. No contradition. D. Mustard Seed KJV-R (Webster) Matthew 13:32 Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge on its branches. It is merely saying the least seed the farmer had. Not the earth.No contradition. E. Earth is 6000 years old However, the oldest human fossils are 195,000 years old. That is opinion. But lets say it is true. Well God rebuilt the earth as I said he did. There was inhabintants before that. No contradition. A. Israel will enjoy perpetual peace/no buildings will be destroyed My opponent claims that Isaiah is referring to the 1000 year reign of Jesus that will occur when he returns. However, Isaiah is in the Old Testament, so it is obviously not referring to Jesus. Why isnt it? Isaiah was refering to the New Jersusalem. Jesus is God, he was OT and NT. No contradition. B. Uncircumcised KJV-R (Webster) Isaiah 52:1 Awake, awake; put on thy strength, O Zion; put on thy beautiful garments, O Jerusalem, the holy city: for henceforth there shall no more come into thee the uncircumcised and the unclean. This is talking about New Jerusalem. It is refering to when Jerusalem will be free and a joy for the Lord. You know that is not the case today or in past. 4) Exodus is a lie "based on archeological evidence" Again opinion not fact!No contradition. A. Genocide "The women were defiled by angels and thus needed to be killed? What?? Basically my opponent is arguing that it is moral to murder innocent women and children." Who is innocent? They committed abominable acts with angels and themselves. Thier children were offspring of giants who was ordered by God to not be on earth doing such. The woman are guilty. The children were hybrids and would contaminant human genes.No contradition. B. Rape "Prove who was raped? Lot's daughters? The Bible isn't clear on whether they were raped, but Lot does INVITE the townspeople to rape his daughters, and God still deems Lot worthy of saving." You said it yourself. Look why Lot did this because Angels would of been raped, i doubt it, they were there to destroy the city. Lot knew they were from God and was protecting them even with his daughters. "This also doesn't answer any of the other passages in Deuteronomy. C – G are also dropped." Not it aint i missed it. KJV-R (Webster) Deuteronomy 21:13 And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife. 14 And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her. Sounds like wrong doing huh?No contradition. 6) The Jesus Myth is just a repeat of pagan Sun God religions You wont listen to the Bible but you will listen to this crap. Ok, fallen angels were threw out of heaven with satan. Satan was God greatest angel and learned tons from God, like the Holy Word of God. In this he knew of man. In heaven is the trinity, so no wonder it was on the earth both before and after Jesus. Nonsense. No contrditions. T: Stone Children In its context several issues emerge. The youth is out of control and is a danger to society. That is evident from the words that describe this behavior. There is no evidence that anywhere in scripture that this had ever been carried out. "You must purge the evil from among you. All Israel will hear of it and be afraid." Deuteronomy 21:18-21 V: Homosexuality Homosexuality has no virtue or purpose. It is against nature. It is a abomination.