The homicdal gas chamber at Auschwitz are not gas chambers

""After the liberation of Auschwitz the building was partly re-constructed into its original state. So today's visitor sees a re-construction with original parts." If this was true, then why doesn't the chimney connect to the building? The chimney does not date to the war - it was added after the war. The fundamental error made by Pro and his sources is in assuming that the delousing chambers at Auschwitz provide an example of standard use of the gas. Delousing chambers were used to kill bugs in clothing. Bugs are much more resistant to cyanide than humans. The delousing process used high concentrations of gas for 24 hours. Humans die with low concentrations in at most twenty minutes. Consequently 95% of the Zyklon B used at Auschwitz was for delousing. There is a problem with this - a HUMAN does indeed die fast by HCN (the gas Zyklon-B holds) - 300PPM to be exact. But this is for only ONE human - not hundreds as described as happening in the gas chamber. 300PPM of HCN is enough to kill one human, but not a group full of humans. Good luck spreading 300PPM of cyanide to kill over a hundred humans! United States gas chambers used to use 3200PPM for just ONE human, because even though 300PPM could kill one human, it wouldn't be fast enough. Also in comparison with United States gas chambers the HCN the Nazis (allegedly) used came from Zyklon-B, which is an even SLOWER process. "The lethal dose 100%, LD100, which gives the concentration or quantity of poison required to kill all (100%) individuals of an observed species. This value is used to make sure that all individuals are successfully killed. The lethal dose 1%, LD1, which gives the concentration or quantity of poison required to kill 1% of all individuals of an observed species. This value is used to mark a threshold beyond which an exposition to that poison is definitively dangerous."[1] Also, why does the alleged Majdanek homicidal gas chamber have Prussian Blue staining? http://img684.imageshack.us... If this was used to kill humans, then shouldn't it NOT have as much staining The gas chamber residues were studied scientifically by the Institute for Forensic Research, based in Poland. The subject gas chamber is the basement of Block 11. The Krakow investigation was so thoroughly debunked by Germar Rudolf that the investigators made no further response. ". These results seemed to confirm Leuchter's findings. Hence, in their 1994 paper, the Krakow investigators suppressed any information about their initial results. Normally, researchers guilty of such unethical conduct are expelled from the scientific community."[2] Also, in 1990 the Krakow Institut for Forensic Research confirmed Leutcher's findings: "Consistent with Leuchter's investigation, the Institute's specialists detected absolutely no traces of cyanide (or ferro-ferri-cyanide compound) in most of the plaster and brick samples taken from the alleged extermination gas chambers. Traces of cyanides were detected in eight samples, seven of which were rooms in Block 3 of Auschwitz main camp where -as the Institute's experts acknowledge - inmate clothing was disinfected by "gassing" with Zyklon. [...] Wall plaster samples were also removed from Block 11 in Auschwitz [main camp] in the presence of Piotr Setkiewicz, M.S., an employee of the Museum." Additional evidence for the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz is contained in an important book by Jean-Claude Pressac. The book is posted on the web [4] with this introduction: Pressac never supplies documents and gives false footnotes. He isn't a reliable source at all. For example: "Pressac also apparently believes that cyanide gas travels horizontally, then vertically, like sewer water filling a basement (p. 473). " [4] He also tried to use an unrelated picture from the Auschwitz Album as proof of a gas method being used six times and noticed how ineffetive that method was. A photo could NOT of course show something happening six times or someone noticing how ineffective something is, yet Pressac put it it anyway. [5] 1. http://www.vho.org... by Germar Rudolf 2. http://www.ihr.org... 3. http://www.ihr.org... 4. http://www.codoh.com... 5. http://www.geniebusters.org...