Is Batman better than Spiderman

Oh, you're back? I had figured you'd given up. The villains you listed have nothing to do with Batman. They were invented within the last twenty years or so. You talk about a fictional universe as if it were real. OF COURSE Batman will beat up those characters. He's a good guy, and they're bad guys. However, allow me to mention that Spiderman has beaten Venom and Carnage many more times than batman. You understand that Spider man and Batman are from different universes, right? Crossovers are very rare. Those things you mention- thrasher, stealth suit, hellbat armor, and justice buster- are nothing more than crazy gadgets invented by DC comics to sell more action figures. In my opinion, the only things Batman NEEDS is the batmobile and his batarang, and some little capsules of drugs every now and then, filled with knockout gas or like that. Why does he need to be all flashy? In the 40s, the batmobile was just a cool old drag racer type thing, and it's sad to see how much it's changed. I find it hilarious for you to mention that Batman has beaten DEATH. Of course he has! Do you think that he would ever be killed off permanently? NO! The guys over at DC have a sweet money maker going, and they're not willing to stop it anytime soon. Death does not affect anybody in the superhero world. No matter how many shards of glass or bullets any superhero goes through, they always come back later on. Even that whole "Death in the family" thing with Jason Todd or whatever was fake. Don't you get it? The characters never really die, they just make it seem that way so it pulls at our heartstrings! So of course batman has beaten death! Lots of times! You also mention how he's beaten the Justice league. That's one of the idiotic things I pointed out. he's not supposed to fight the justice league. Why the hell would he fight the Justice League? They're all good guys, and they should learn to work together! Superhero comics are meant to be the ultimate battle between good and evil, so when good fights good everything gets confusing. These days, comics aren't episodic, fun little niblets. They're long, drawn out soap operas, because the comic publishers figure they can bolster their wallets if the story keeps going over five or so issues. You can't just buy one, you've got to try them all! See? And, of course, if batman fights Superman, the stupid comic fans will go for it. At first, it may have been a cool tactic, but now it's too overused. In the old days, when some bad guys would spray Superman with kryptonite from a helicopter, and he started falling, batman was willing to scoop him up from the batcopter. What happened to those days? You might say it's stupid, but I just feel like they should be platonic buddies, not raging Hell beasts. If I had to choose between Spiderman and Batman, I'd pick batman. Evidently, marvel is a little more light hearted. Spiderman still zips around, doling out corny punchlines and swinging around on a bunch of webs. I'd say that far less has changed for him. He's still the same guy he was fifty years ago. I picked up a Spiderman comic book, from only five years back, and it was pretty good. Sure, there may be just as many gimmicks as in Batman, but at least Spiderman's world hasn't shifted topsy turvy. I can still get a good chuckle from him. And you have to admit, Spiderman actually has superpowers. Batman doesn't. I think that's the key point here. Voters, I'm counting on you to make the right decision, whatever that may be. Also, sir, i highly suggest that, in the future, you make your arguments a bit longer. It's a wise choice.