The Christian God Does Not Exist

Your arguments are now drifting to the position of free-will and fail to address God's existence. It has no relevance to the resolution and i will explain: 1) Humans don't have free-will 2) God controls all human actions and can still exist Whether or not we have free-will is unimportant, it still doesn't disprove God's existence, but i will address these points anyways. "Free Will: Many disagree on what free will is, which is fine, but there is agreement on what free is not. If your actions can be predicted with 100% accuracy, then you don't have free will." Like i said, i will use my previous definition. You fail to establish of free-will, but explain what free-will is not. "P2: Problem Of Free Will(Non-gods): P1)An omniscient god knows the future. P2) An omniscient god can't be wrong. P3) An omniscient god can predict your actions and can't be wrong. P4)An omniscient god knows your actions. C1) You don't have free will." There is a difference between knowing your future actions and influencing the course of your actions. Hypothetically, lets say that I know your going to get hit by a car tomorrow but do i have to take action and warn you? No, do you have free-will to cross the street not being aware of an incoming car? Yes. Same way with God. God placed Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden (Gen. 2-3) knowing that they would sin, but allowing them to choose between good or evil. "P1) good is whatever god wants P2) Bad is which opposes god. P3)god can't do what he does not want C) God is always good. This proposal of Divine Command Theory renders all morality completely trivial. If there is a tri-omni god, morality is so trivially that it does not exist." the purpose of the Christian God is to show us as moral beings who can distinguish between right and wrong (Gen. 3:22) how to be more like God himself. "P1) If your actions can be predicted with 100% accuracy, then you don't have free will. P2) An omnipotent god has free will P3) An omniscient god can know his actions with 100% accuracy C1) An omnipotent god can't be omniscient, because omniscience entails no free will, because then god could 100% predict his own actions(which means he also is not omnipotent, because then he can't predict his actions) C2) The only way a tri-omni god can have free will is if he does not have omnipotence or omniscience, thus no longer being tri-omni" Your arguments seem very confusing. You speak of how we don't have free-will, but then switch back to God's own free-will. Your 1st conclusion is false because it does not follow that an omniscient God has no free-will and i will explain: Omniscience co-exists with omnipotence. In my previous example, if i knew that you were going to get hit by a car tomorrow, that foreknowledge gives me the ability to either prevent that from happening or allowing it. Your argument then breaks down. "P1) God must always act for the greater good, since he is omnibenevolent. P2) An omnipotent god can act in a way contrary to the greater good C) Omnipotence and Omnibenevolence are incompatabile " 1) You strayed from the definitions i set and introduced a concept called "the greater good" 2) I never said that God can act in contrary to the greater good, i said that all good is subject to God's laws. Let me repeat what i said: "whatever God considers "good" and "evil" is subject to his interpretation, not yours. If God sees it best for you to suffer in order to discover the fullest power of good in a world of evil then that is "good." All of God's commandments and Jesus are expressions of God's definition of divine goodness, thus we can only know what he considers good or necessary based on these things. Conclusion: God exists and is coherent in his omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and omniscience