Why are parents taking their kids out of public schools

The first rebuttle you offer is this: "lookingattheissues posted, "the youth in America's public educational institutions are being sacrificed on the alter of multiculturalism, political correctness, and racial preferences." LuciferWept responded to lookingattheissues "You are 100% correct. However the antidote for this poison is not homeschooling, Instead, mandating that the youth be educated in public schools is the solution to your problem.) lookingattheissues response to LuciferWept's comment..."....mandating that the youth be educated in public schools is the solution..." lookingattheissues response to LuciferWept..... This solution you suggested is like saying to some one who is being poisoned that the "antidote," to the poison was to administer even more poison to the victims." You misrepresent my argument: If education in public schools is mandatory, then even the children of the political elites must attend alongside the offspring of the commoners. This will make it so that the elites will be much less likely to encourage progressive (or conservative) education biases in these schools. I will not repeat my alternative to the current education system, which can be found in my second post. Then you go on to discuss my comment: "The home schooled child is just as likely to be indoctrinated with some strange philosophy of the parent, just as likely as the student in a Religious institution or the current public school." Your response: "There are parents who shouldn't be in charge of a childs welfare but are those who by law have been given access to the most vulnerable, our young children, then to be trusted to their welfare and education, that they would have the childs best interests and not their own personal agendas as teachers." Indeed that a child's best interest is held by the parent, which is what makes those corrupted doctrines and strange philosophies even more dangerous. The parent may not consider their ideology to be perfidious, I am sure that those Wahhabis who indoctrinate their children to hate all non-Sunni Muslims do not believe they are doing anything wrong, just as the KKK-member parents feel no wrong in teaching a child to hate all non-whites. Common religious philosophies can be just as insidious as the above mentioned examples. For example, Catholic doctrine encourages weakness and submissiveness; these traits very detrimental to the demands of any job market but quite beneficial to the con artists selling "salvation". Yes, I know very well who Thomas Sowell is. In your third rebuttal, you left off a key part of my argument. Instead, you jumped to multiculturalism. It is important, as I stated, for a child to meet contradictory opinions. Not for the sake of multiculturalism, but for the sake of developing reasoned thought. He/she can challenge their own beliefs, whether that be religious, economic, social, or political. Your method is exactly the same way we get to the modern "safe space" generation: Children who's ideologies are never challenged and never meet intellectual opposition. Is the God of the Christians so weak, their faith in him so flimsy, that he cannot possibly withstand the onslaught of philosophy, reason, and questions? It appears so. I find it odd that you had to tell me who Thomas Sowell was, one of the greater philosophers of our age, but did not care to explain who Marlin Maddoux was. Luckily, we have Google. Turns out he was a "pioneer of Christian radio". https://en.wikipedia.org... His argument (and yours since you are using it) that "most Christian schools have student aid and scholarship opportunities to help with the cost" is negating by that very fact. Of course someone who has made a living off peddling Christianity would desire that more children are indoctrinated into Christianity, like Mr. Maddoux. (shoulda stuck with Sowell). This is just as true as that the Pope needs children to be brought up to give money to the Catholic Church or that the Saudis make gains by indoctrinating children in to Wahhabiism. Thank you for the debate.