There is evidence for Creation

IntroductionI will be splitting this round into 2 parts. In one part I will be refuting Pro's evidence, in the other I will be arguing that god cannot have created the universe. RefutationsI will now be addressing the evidence that Pro presented for creation.ONE: The termitePro argues that the termite could not have evolved because of its dependency on a species of protazoa.Now, there are three things I will address about this argument:1) I could conceed it and it still would not be evidence of creation. ~A=/=B2) There are many examples of species simultaneously evolving to help each other out, this would be no different[1][2].3) The evolution of the termite is already understood in biology. Cryptocercus is a type of roach that eats wood. It is thought that termites either evolved from Cryptocercus, or have a common ancestor with them. The roaches get the protazoa through a transfer from the hind gut (rectum). The roaches could even transfer the protazoa with a species of termite called Zootermopsis[3][4]."Even more primitive termites may have fed on a range of things they could digest themselves, Poinar said, but eventually they acquired protozoa that dramatically increased their ability to digest cellulose, and through evolutionary processes they came to depend on it.""Somewhere on the evolutionary scale the termites began producing a liquid that contained protozoa that they would excrete. The termite offspring in turn consume the feces and thereby gain the protozoa in their digestive systems. It took time for all of this to get worked out, the study indicated. The successful establishment of protozoa in the termites required them to withstand the chemical and physical conditions inside the alimentary tract, use the gut contents as a food source, cause no damage to the host and be carried through successive stages and generations. But by the different species each specializing at what they do best – the termite eats, the protozoa digests – the two groups have both had extraordinary evolutionary success."[5].So, in conclusion, this point would not prove creationism if it was true, and the evolution of the termite is understood.TWO: Bee and FlowerAs stated in the previous point, coevolution is a thing. It also would not prove creationism if this point was correct.As well as that, current studies suggest that the bee lived BEFROE the flower, and that the bee did not originally need the flower to live[6]. THREE: MoralityHere, Pro assumes that there exists an objective morality. When we look at claims of "right" and "wrong", they are different between different people.FOUR: Soft TissueThe tissue was not soft when found, it was rehydrated. It is also unknown if the tissue that was rehydrated was the original tissue or not. The age of fossils is also not dependent on preservasion of the fossil, as preservation is dependent on other factors. The age of a fossil is found based off the rock it was found in. Last, DNA has never been recovered from dinosaur fossils, but DNA has been recovered from fossils that have been dated between 10,000 and 300,000 years old[7].Can God have created the universe?P1) If God created the universe, the universe has a cause.P2) The universe can only have a cause if tensed facts exist.P3) Tensed facts do not exist.C1) The universe does not have a cause (follows from P2 and P3).C2) GOd did not create the universe (follows from P1 and C1). Defense of Premise 1:I am sure that this does not need much for explanation. If God created the universe, the logically god is the cause and the universe is the effect.Defense of Premise 2:The principals of causality require for there to be a movement of time. A before the effect, an after the cause, etc. This requires tensed facts.This point is seemingly agreed upon by all time theorists, even William Lane Craig[8].Defense of Premise 3:To defend premise 3 I will be proposing that the most probable theory of time is the B-Theory of Time.Effects like relativity and time dialation support the B-Theory of Time while refuting the A-Theory of Time (the A-Theory of Time is the theory of time that allows tensed facts to exist).Further support for this premise comes from recent experiments in quantum mechanics. Under the B-Theory of Time, the progression of time is an illusion, and time does not really pass. If one were to have "god view", a view of the universe from outside of it, the universe would appear static.A recent study has shown that the progress of time is an illusion caused from quantum entanglement, and that if you did have "god view" that the universe would actually appear static[9].So, we can conclude that it is not logically possible for god to have created the universe, and therefore anything that appears like it is evidence for god creating the universe cannot logically be real evidence for creation, but misinterpreted evidence. Sources:[1]: https://web.stanford.edu...;[2]: http://evolution.berkeley.edu...[3]: http://www.quora.com...[4]: http://www.jstor.org... [5]: http://oregonstate.edu...[6]: http://www.nytimes.com...[7]: http://www.talkorigins.org...[8]: http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com...[9]: https://medium.com...;