Real Democrats are superior to Occupy Democrats

Alright so let's break down something here.Pro, who has full burden of proof in this debate, has yet to give a single valid reason for the resolution being true.What Pro then proceeds to do is focus on totally irrelevant parts of my argument and try to strawman me (which I will render unsuccessful) and follows this up by deciding to possibly do something so ridiculously ironic that he proved me right twice over and himself wrong three. The Barrack Obama quote is hilarious for two totally separate reasons. The first is that China was and is in no way at all USA’s closest ally and this is a severe insult to all its other allies to suggest. In addition, diplomacy is not what on Earth he meant to say there. Surely the guy who sends drones in to overthrow a government without any prior permission from the UN is not the same guy preaching about diplomacy. Democracy and diplomacy are also not related as much as one may think. The democrat would always put the good of the many above that of the few unless enough of the majority supported the right of the few to be cared for whereas the Republican would insist on rights regardless of what the majority people said was good or bad at the time. The Republican outlook is often far closer to diplomacy at it only works if you are able to sugar-coat the truth and not offend people while ignoring them and insisting on ‘inherent rights’ regardless of what they say or do to change you, the Democrats don’t need to master diplomacy as they need only cower to the many to ensnare their votes for the next election. Sometimes this spinelessness angers the populace and the intention backfires and makes the ‘many’ hate them but sometimes it works so well that it creates 2 terms of a president that went from economically left-wing Iranian diplomacy master Osama hunting badass to centrist, drone-abusing bully not too soon after his second term was confirmed.But historically, China has been our ally. https://en.wikipedia.org...; You need to be an American to be a real democrat? Yes I was talking about Democrats. I even capitalized it for you. I wasn't talking about democratic ideals. There's a reason I capitalized it, to make the distinction.That’s news to me. I thought a ‘real’ democrat was simply someone who supports democratic views but was not a member of the Occupy movement which is exactly what your resolution suggests.You read it wrong. I clearly made a reference to followers of the party.If you meant people who were literally members of the Democratic party then you’re completely and utterly wrong as the occupy movement is literally raw democracy in that it is a group of people using their numbers to get what they want and growing successfully by doing so whereas the Democratic party uses very undemocratic powers to enforce a series of laws that only serve that the majority see as moral at the time of election and what they think they can get away with doing even if the majority disagree.To the first sentence, that is correct.The other point: that's wrong. Many Democrats have done good things for society. Same as Republicans. And I'm not picking on Occupy Democrats alone. I know Occupy Republicans would do the same nonsense. If you studied or remotely understood Gandhi’s views and Malala’s extremely horrific ordeals and fight for democracy in a nation that so violently abhors it, you would understand that put together they are 2000x the democrat that Obama or Clinton ever were or will be. You don’t need to be American to be a real democrat.Again wasn't using Democratic in that way. Your UN point is so ironic that I almost pissed myself laughing. You said that since Switzerland won in the very same report that I admitted Denmark came third in, that Denmark is not the happiest nation on Earth. Yet 2 sentences before that you were just beginning your rant about how unreliable a source those reports are since the oh-so-inconsistent UN made them. Let me explain this in simple terms to you; until 2015 and following the 2013 report, Denmark was considered the officially happiest nation on Earth. It isn’t racist to say this nor is it nonfactual. The Occupy Movement was only saying that until then. Now they only say that it is one of the happiest nations which, being 3rd in the world and all after having come 1st previously, is very factual indeed. If you do not understand that nations supporting the Occupy Movement’s ideals are consistently thrashing the happiness ratings in the UN reports and that this is what they meant rather than Denmark specifically then you don’t understand the point they were making.Except the UN resolutions make mistakes a lot. The inconsistencies are too little. Take Canada for instance, a country that is pretty much Anglo-Norman like England, and Anglican. Australia is the same. Same culture, yet somehow they have a higher score than England itself. And this is the same map that says Scandinavia is superior, which is also incorrect.