Eastern Europeans Should be Purged

I look forward to reading your opening arguments. As specified in round one, both Con and I will share the BoP. It's on me to *show* that Eastern Europeans [I. E, those situated in the region of Eastern Europe] and provide valid reasons for this. Likewise, Con is to show that there should not be such a purge and that there would be no viable justification[s] for it--as well as addressing and rebutting all of my points. **Preface** Also note that I do not personally advocate such a purge and this debate does not reflect my own individual views. Rather, I am arguing from a purely impartial perspective. Likewise I advise any potential voters to base their decision on arguments only--and select who outlined best case. Opening Case C1) Population Control This is perhaps the primary benefit to a purge of those in Eastern Europe. The world population currently stands at seven billion and is expected to reach a massive eleven billion by 2100. Thus meaning that the planet has become wholly overpopulated. The full "effects" of overpopulation includes degradation of the in environment--which is primarily induced by overuse of oil, gas and other natural substances, as well as rise in unemployment and an increased high cost of living. With the population set to expand by another four billion in only eighty-five years, it's apparent that these issues are to become a significantly large problem for the planet. Essentially, the world can simply not harbor such vast numbers of people without having more rapid environmental damage or further increase in unemployment/higher cost of living, etc. As of yet there has been no clear plan put in place to control the planet's population or at least limit the numbers that are adding to it. If there was to be a "purge", it would provide a solution in dealing with this huge growth and decreasing it. C2) Poverty in Eastern EuropeNow I will highlight precisely how population control relates to Eastern Europe and why a purge of a general populace should take place there. It should come as no surprise that poverty in Eastern Europe has been an issue, both before and after communism. On the contrary to improving at the rate that it should do, poverty has a remained and in fact deepened in many parts of the region. Which is hence why people from Eastern Europe make up one of the largest immigrant groups and have migrated in large numbers to western Europe and other more economically advanced areas of the world. This large-scale migration has obviously prevented Eastern European countries actually developing financially, due to the fact that their inhabitants have found jobs elsewhere and are thus not paying into the economy. The corruption of Eastern Europe governments has also played a large part in why some countries within the region have shown such poor growth. The top ten most poorest countries in Europe, are in fact all Eastern European. With Moldova being ranked number one, the Republic of Kosovo number two, and Ukraine number three. Other countries in the list include Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina. This amount of poverty without doubt leads to a lot of suffering in Eastern Europe, particularly in the very most poorest areas which are often rural. Homelessness and lack of food are primary concerns--and is again what has led to the mass increase of Eastern European migrants into western countries such as the U. K, a place that has struggled to support the amount coming in. So, this provides just another reason why a purge could be beneficial. For starters it would decrease the amount of poverty in Eastern as well as the number of migrants that are so poor, they essentially have no where else to go and are forced into asylum. The population figures in countries such as the U. K and Germany [two places that attract the largest number of Eastern Europeans] would also become less; thus serving as another benefit in terms of money and housing. C3) MethodThe method this purge would involve the use of nuclear, thus making it a very quick and easy process. The Eastern European countries that would be hit are be the top 10 most poorest and Poland, and the specific target places would naturally be those in rural areas as again, this is where the poverty generally is. More well-developed areas like cities and capitals would not be a part of the purge--as again, one of the primary reasons for such a genocide is the poorness that exists within these region. At least 1 million would be killed. Instead of prolonged suffering [which is usually the case with attacks on general populace and genocides] this purge would kill targeted civilians immediately--as well as being a very clean and easy way to orchestrate the attack. Now over to Con. Sources: [1. ]. http://ourworldindata.org...[2.] . http://www.theguardian.com...[3.] . http://www.theguardian.com...[5.] . http://news.bbc.co.uk...[6.] . http://www.bbc.co.uk...