PS3 is better than Xbox 360

I am now convinced that my opponent didn't even read my argument, or that he can't read. " since my opponent didnt really make much of an argument why the 360 is a better CONSOLE " Really? I addressed almost all your claims about how PS3 is better, refuting every single one (notice how you don't try to win those points back), and by doing this, showed how the 360 is superior. But since you have a short attention span, or don't like hearing the other side like those creationists, I'll make a list, just for you. Positives: Better online Games perform better, as in faster loading, less pop-ups in GTA4 (source: Gametrailers comparisons) this makes your PS3 hardware irrelevant doesn't it. More expansive and better rated software source: metacritics. And that`s all I, it`s for gaming, and the functions linking it to gameplay are superior to the PS3. Now, your list. And I promise that everything you wrote in your second list has already been addressed. -Better hardware. It's a much more powerful machine. -Better processing power -Bluray disks can hold expansively more data than 360 HDdvd disks -PS3 has 7 core processers, as oppossed to the Xbox360's 3 processers. -Uses Cell proccessing. -Standard HD Free online play -Able to install Linux Except for the blu-ray and linux and online, all your points are hardware, which, as pointed out to you multiple times now, has not so far made a difference to anybody, and despite MORE PROCESSING POWER GAARR, the PS3 loads games longer, can't maintain pictures of rosters in NHL 08 (just one example), has more pop-ups in GTA 4, and those are the only 2 ones I've seen myself in person, but there are vids, as stated again, on the internet that will prove that to you. Now, I do not mind spending 60 bucks a year for quality online services. Do not try to say the PS3 network is better, it lags far more, this cannot be disputed. Linux? What? Read up? And that`s all I, it`s for --->gaming<---, and the functions linking it to gameplay are superior to the PS3. Again, if you want to talk about all the PC-like functions, I heard the PS3 can be used for hacking power, that's fine. But tell me this, if you have a choice between 2 cars, one that roles well, and one that doesn't role at all but has a great stereo and some extra functions, which would you pick? The role of a car is to help you get around, the role of a gaming machine is for games. "Just meerely stated him opinion, not the facts. " This alone should disqualify you, I can cite you numerous facts I wrote in the first argument. "And went on and on about some game convention that makes no difference in how the consoles perform I will just state the positives of having a ps3 as opposed to a 360" Well if you think the fact that the maker of your car or your gaming machine will screw you over doesn't matter to you, there's something wrong with your logic. The maker supports the machine, with software updates, etc. The maker directly makes your console inferior by deciding that this generation doesn't need rumble, then realizes everyone enjoys it, so adds it to their controller way after the console's release, so you have to spend an again, more money on a controller you should have already gotten. So to summarize, my opponent should stop debating.