Lord of the Rings Trilogy is Better than the Harry Potter Trilogy

1st, Many will be textual inconsistencies & contradictions in the story of the books, which cannot be logically refuted since upon being published, the story is finalized canon. 2nd, you didn't define "better" in your opening, leaving it open to anyone's preference. You continue to harp on the "higher quality" angle but fail to realize the storytelling of each series is completely different since one is for a kid audience the other for an adult audience. It's equivalent to you trying to compare milk to beer; chewing gum to chewing tobacco; 10 speed to motorcycle, etc. 3rd, you continue to straw man argue using porn as an example. It's about HP AND LotR--nothing else. Compare the two in a cultural influence diagram against each other like I've done--not along side a cultural influence of porn, which is, honestly, dumb. 4th, you're still playing semantics with the voters--strategetically using limited wording to place cultural influence only in a public revenue-based guideline. Cultural Influence combines not only financial success, but educational benefits, foreign perspectives, sociological & psychological benefits, and more. 5th, you didn't debunk my "better"=cultural influence standard. You merely rambled off financial statistics which is only 1/3 of my argument, the other 2/3s you have avoided.6th, All you're hypothethical questions, "what if" are irrelevant since they do not invalidate the current status of HP. Wishful thinking is ineffective at causing another reality to the one that is current.7th, Again, "the gay" stuff was for publicity, appeasement to the gay agenda. Her spoken words do not invalid nor diminish the quality of her previously written finalized canon of HP. You look silly arguing from a position of redundancy. 8th, your argumentation reveals itself as void of strength & integrity when you cannot properly assess your opponent's clear words. "Con's excuse for the unseen deaths in HP is that we shouldn't show graphic mortality to kids." I used sarcasm to highlight a specific argument: "yes, let's grammatically depict MULTIPLE, graphic mortality to 9 years olds". The key word is "multiple". Had Rowling's graphically depicted Mad Eye Moody, Tonks and Lupin's murder & death or more than she did do, this would have been seen as tasteless & too extreme in a children's book. A fact which you ignore & seem to be unable to grasp. A 3rd Wheel is also, simply, "A person that does not belong in a two person group". And isn't limited to romantic couples. See the perspective of other persons in link. Notice the "Best Answer" is the one indicating "platonic friendship", to which my Ron reference indicated.https://answers.yahoo.com...9th, "talkative," "mischievous," "gossipy," are characteristics a lot of kids have esp. girls. Ginny was a child with these traits. Seems like you expect every girl in HP to be like Hermione. Again, Ginny faced Voldemort's thoughts similar to how Harry did, which makes these two the only person to experience the mentality of Tom Riddle. That right there is one of many things that bonded Harry & Ginny. You not recognizing the quip "Woman are you mad!" is evidence you haven't read the HP book very well or at all. It was a reoccurring exclamation said by Ron whenever Hermione suggested or did something extremely bold. I used it as banter in reference to Ginny boldly defying the bullies. Humor has been an element in my argument style. Proof: Draco. See Biography; Education at Hogwart; First Year, Paragraph 2 http://harrypotter.wikia.com... Ministry. Same source; Fourth Year. Voldemort & Bellatrix. Same source; Battle of Hogwarts. She actuallys blocks Bellatrix's Killing Curse.http://www.youtube.com...LotR Errors, Contradictions & Inconsistencies, Pt. 1Gandalf doen't realize Frodo's via Bilbo's magic ring was Sauron's One ring. He is considered wisest of the Maiar in Arda. He failed for 60 years to connect the similarities between the ring being a Ring of Power? Saruman had told him long ago it was the only Ring of Power without a gemstone and Sauron's ruling ring. Gandalf is either an idiot or Tolkien was too lazy to discern his own errors.Sauron is an idiot. He never prepared defenses to guard the location where the One ring could be destroyed. This is completely anti-characteristic for a Maia of Sauron's intellect. Sauron is either a non-tactical idiot or Tolkien wasn't inventive enough to come up with a clever way for them to breach the mount. "Aragorn tells the hobbits in Bree, "I know all the lands between the Shire and the Misty Mountains, for I have wandered over them for many years."[9] But later, speaking of the Ettendales, he says, "That is troll-country, and little known to me," and "I do not know the way" to Rivendell by detouring through them.[10] The Ettendales or Ettenmoors are on a line between the Shire and the northern part of the Misty Mountains."http://tolkiengateway.net..."Of a total of sixty-two chapters in the three-volume book set, little to none was filmed from nine of them. These are indicated in red. Another thirty-one chapters had substantial portions left out of the screenplay. These are indicated in blue. The Remaining twenty-two chapters—less than half of the total—had most or all of their material included. These are indicated in green. "http://lotr.wikia.com..."Sauron, an immortal almost-all-powerful being, puts most of his life force into a small magical ring in order to control the other rings. By doing this he basically makes himself extremely vulnerable and mortal. As seen in the beginning of the first movie, it's enough to cut his ring finger to kill him almost completely. This makes absolutely no sense. Why would such a powerful being make himself so vulnerable and mortal, no matter what kind of world domination plans he had? Surely such a powerful being did know how vulnerable he would become if he makes such a ring? Wasn't it utterly stupid to do so, no matter how ingenuous the world-domination plan (which then even failed monumentally)?"http://warp.povusers.org...This website also exposes:the stupidity of the eaglesGandalf's illogical witholding to use his powerscoward elvesillogical geography of Helm's Deepa lack of tactical battle strategemsand more.LotR Errors, Contradictions & Inconsistencies, Pt. 2ALL QUOTES TAKEN FROM: http://www.moviemistakes.com...At the beginning of the Fellowship's journey, they are resting on a hilltop (Hollin) with rocky formations. Bill the pony is tethered in the background in one shot. Then come the spying crows from Saruman and they all quickly hide. When the crows swoop in closer we see no-one, but who hid the pony and where?In the Chamber of Mazarbul, when Legolas lets loose the double arrows at the Troll near Balin's Tomb, in that shot he stands in front of the same wall as in the next shot. In this second shot he spins around, slices two Orcs and then looks at the Troll in front of him, only this second shot is flipped. In those two shots he stands in front of a solid rock wall with particular markings between two pillars. In the next shot it shows Legolas' back and the Troll down below as Legolas ducks down avoiding the Troll's chain flying overhead. Then in the next consecutive shot from the front again Legolas rises and is now standing in front of a stone wall that has a large alcove with books also between two pillars. These shots were spliced from a longer sequence because the two walls noted are adjacent to each other - in the film the alcove wall is to the left of the solid wall and they share a pillar between them.More mistakes of the LotR books/moives that crush Pro's assertion: that LotR "as being more skillful for the actual content."