There is no misogyny. There are difference and diverse manners of treating females.

Hello, sillydebate. Thank you for your reply. You argue that there exists "already ingrained prejudices against women" in the act or event of honour-killing. However, there is no basis to make such claim. The fact that women is responsible for the honour of her family, and will be punished if she fails to sustain the acceptable level of it does not at all logically mean that there exists some prejudice as a cause at the basis of such act. In fact, the logic that "If you fail to do something, you will be punished" is the idea that constitutes the fundamental of human laws that I assume you seem to support. So does that mean the human law holds prejudice at its core? In other words, does the concept "If you fail to follow the rules, you will be punished" hold any prejudice at its foundation? No. You are simply incorrect to bring any notion of "prejudice" relating to the act or event of honour-killing, a punishment for wrongdoing. The idea of right or wrong related to honour-killing is a matter of subjective value judgment and conscience. Let us first clearly agree on this point. Now, the second point: Those who carry out what they deem as appropriate punishment against someone who has done wrongdoing worthy of the said punishment are, of course, not held to the same standards that are used to judge such punishable acts. To put it very plainly, a judge that awards death sentence to a serial killer as well as an executor that carries out the punishment are not held to the same standards to the convicted killer. If the same standards, in this case "freedom" but not limited to it, were applied to all the involved parties, no punishment of any kind in any system would ever be possible to be performed. Also you brought up the point that the female's action is not measured by the same ruler. Now, this type of advocating the "same ruler" is a repulsive claim that pretends to support "equality" while disregarding the differences and diversity in the manners of treating females. There exists absolutely no reasoning to measure male acts and female acts to the same, equal measurements; rather, due to much natural, chemical, physical, biological and physiological differences between males and females that science has constantly discovered, it is much more rational and reasonable to apply difference standards based on their sex. A call for "equal" or "same" standard is purely an ignorant and indefensible attempt at, as I have argued in the first round of this argument, refusing to recognize differences and thereby refusing to respect diversity that exists in reality. The "equality between sexes" is only a myth that perpetuates lies and pretenses of "equality", for the very fantasy is founded upon the nonsense and falsehood that there is no difference between sexes. We must get rid of such "equality" rubbish we must apply different standards between sexes by recognising the inherent differences between sexes in order to move forward toward embracing the diversity resulting from them. And from this honest realization and acceptance of facts, we can move on to recognize and respect the differences and diversity between individuals and cultures, until we can embrace and celebrate our diversity.