Necrophilia should be legal

I have indeed changed my view on pedophilia through the course of this debate, the reason for that being, as I looked at it logically, the only objection I could find against it is rooted in morality. Since I see morality as a societal device, used to keep people under the authority of governing officials, when I see it in myself I attempt to destroy it. So, given the choice between defending my current moral standards or annihilating them, I chose to annihilate them. All I had to do was force myself to look at the world through the eyes of a pedophile, at which point I realized that I don’t really take issue with their sexual preference, as long as there is informed consent for all parties (so that if the child is harmed, they were aware of the risks beforehand). Therefore, my views on pedophilia and the legalization thereof are not inconsistent, they’re merely different than they were at the beginning of the debate.‘…I would very much like to see you describe a system in which children can effectively give their 'informed consent'.’ I don’t feel qualified to create such a system. The legalization of necrophilia is a cause that I have devoted a lot of time and effort to researching, so I feel that I can properly organize a system in which necrophilia can be practiced with complete informed consent. I can’t say I’ve done any kind of research at all into the cause for the legalization of pedophilia, so I wouldn't know where to begin with organizing such a system. My solution is simply to leave it to the pedophiles to come up with a working informed consent system for themselves.‘So isn't society's reaction obvious?’ Yes, society's reaction is obvious. However, I didn't say that this is a test of society's reaction to necrophilia, but rather society's readiness for necrophilia. Since, as it were, the only argument that remains against necrophilia is an argument of morality, all that's necessary to have my system implemented is a slight change in society's current moral standards. Your willingness to debate the topic, even hypothetically, proves that there are at least some people who don’t write the subject off as a complete impossibility from the start. So you see, whether I win or lose the debate I’ve gotten the information I need. As long as I proceed slowly, people will be receptive to what I have to say, and then it’s only a matter of time before necrophilia is legalized.‘In your response please clarify what you intended to write,…’ What I meant was that there are many things that people used to say would never be legal – abortion, homosexuality, businesses open on Sunday, transgenderism, witchcraft, female voters, marijuana, etc. – but which have now been legalized.As a conclusion to my argument, I’d like to leave you with this quote from the book Necrophilia Variations by Supervert (1):‘Morality is made by man–so how can you really give any credence to it? Today it’s ok to love the dead in spirit but not in flesh. Tomorrow, who knows? Maybe men of the future will consider nostalgia a more contemptible perversion than necrophilia. After all, to love the dead is to live in the past, and that can’t be healthy.’1.http://supervert.com...