The Judeo/Christian God is Truine

No, not two basic contentions, I simply compared the notion of Trinity of God to the logical and biblical analysis,my colleague is simply attempting to simplify his job. Is the Trinity logical? The verse I cited where God creates man in his likeness and because man is singular (made up of one component not three ) and hence because he is in the likeness of God would imply that God is Unitarian (remember Jesus was the son of MAN) . This does not mean that simply because man is made in the likeness of God he is like God, so only God posses unique qualities that make him the Almighty. But compared to all other species on earth, yes we are sovereign, we are all powerful, we are the masters so the notion that God would be trainee and create as in his image yet we are not trainee while sending part of his trainee nature to us is simply a flawed logical deduction. How can God make us in his image and fundamentally make us a unity yet he is a plurality? Humans share some of God's attributes but without the perfection and comprehension of God. Man is merciful and kind buy God's mercy and kindness is limitless and supreme over what man can ever posses, it is the ultimate completion of kindness and this applies to all good qualities and noble ideals that man looks up to. So by this analogy, in God's likeness, God is one not three,just as man is one not three. Yes man shall leave his father and mother and be joined with his wife and shall become one FLESH,it doesn't mean they shall become one entity, given the stipulation against adultery in the Bible, the emphasis on flesh is to show that man shall fulfill his cardinal desires only with his wife and as such a child symbolizes how they became one flesh. My colleague is making a marriage comparison with God however God is not married nor is he flesh that he should have such animalistic desires. The description was only meant to lay the ground work against adultery. Also, if being joined in marriage means becoming one, are you saying that God is a result of two prior entities joining in marriage? This is blasphemy, how can you say this parallels God's nature? If anything it shows that God is one ad he doesn't say man shall be joined with woman and they become trainee, they become one... interesting.... Omnipresent ? What does being omnipresent have to do with being trainee? You either are implying that while Jesus walks this earth,God walks it too? Or that while Jesus walks this earth, he is also in heaven,which of the two do you mean?if God is everywhere why does Jesus fall to his face and pray? Why doesn't he just speak? And how can he be complete when a part of him is crucified and persecuted by his creation? Are you implying that Jesus did not die rather it was a deception as God's death would contradict being omnipresent? Also since Jesus is not with us,does that mean that God is not as present as he was then? If the father,son and holy spirit are equal in nature,the concept of prayer is negated. If I am made of 3 parts,being equal in nature means that at the core we are the same and hence share wisdom, the presence of perfect wisdom negates prayer as one would understand all things,.and would see the wisdom in God's works hence would be patient as opposed to engaging in prayer. Yes,Jesus and God have different wills as Jesus said So Jesus said to him, "Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One, that is, God. Mark 10:18" how can my colleague claim that my statements are unsupported when Jesus said only God is good,does this mean that God has an evil side? But God is all good. Since my colleague keeps claiming that my statements are unsupported yet they are deduced from Biblical verses, I shall support my earlier assertion that since Jesus and God have different wills(and atimes conflicting) God can not be trainee yet lack unity of will and purpose. To support this claim I turn to Luke 22:42 "Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done." So Jesus had a different will, something that proves that at the core Jesus was both subservient to God and was subject to God's command. Are you implying that God would have to persecute himself to save man even though when he wants something,he says it and it is? Yet Jesus prayed for what he wanted he did not say be and it is. The argument that Jesus and God are the same but with different roles is lacking as the fact that they have different wills implies that God is not a unity as seen by this verse.would you really have us believe the one who holds all power in existence is made of three parts, with different wills and rolls yet still the same? That is a stretch in imagination. Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know: These are the words of Jesus. How can he say he is a man approved by God and my colleague rejects the word of Jesus and calls him God? Jesus said A, someone said B, if we believe in Jesus we must believe in A, Jesus said that he was a man approved by God,key word a MAN, remember man was made in the likeness of God hence by that fact Jesus could not be part of the trainee nature of God which would negate the trainee nature of God. if the father, son,holyspirirt are equal in nature and POWER, how come Jesus was powerless to save himself on the cross yet he had prayed for safety and he said ...why have you forsaken me? Is Jesus really equal to God in power and nature, Jesus who ate,sorrowed and who Satan attempted to tempt? Is this how low we as a creation think of God? Yet even the angels are in a higher regard than a man that is born into a womb of a woman, was Jesus breast fed as a baby? Are you saying God was breast fed,don't you feel shame to claim such a thing,is it befitting the majesty of God to use the restroom? But Jesus did all this as he was a man, will you claim Jesus and God are of the same nature and power then? Does Jesus look like God so they are twins? Does God have a skeleton and does he grow old like Jesus did? All these questions show the flaw in this wild assertion. God's glory and majesty does not befit such low comparisons. My colleague makes various quotes from John, of course out of all Bible books, I would probably use a book that validates my opinion,however John 21:24 says King James Bible This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true." Which means that the book was written by "we" a group of people and not the verbatim word of Jesus but a composition of works by whoever we is and whoever that disciple is, hence it seems futile for me to spend time refuting this. Also Genesis says In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" it says nothing of Jesus,had what is written been true ,it would certainly have come up in the oldest testament from God,whereby he declared his trainee nature but it did not,rather God simply declared his unity and created all things. Should I address the writings in John when the but according to luke( not the word of witnesses ), prior to his birth, Jesus did not exist."On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise the child, he was named Jesus, the name the angel had given him before he was conceived." Remember a name the angel had given him,it does not say which is his name before coming to your womb, a name is given to what did not exist prior, that is why children do not get names until they are born. So are you suggesting that God was nameless because he wasn't born yet? so was God two parts, then manifest a third? As for the editing,please refer to the prior verse where you inserted (father ) and (son) in parenthesis, that was the editing, it was your post not mine an attempt to cloud the judgement. The verse in question is clear, I said is the word isn't necessarily Jesus, why because David too fit that criteria. If it said the word was Jesus Christ,then I would not have brought it up but remember this is talking about the very beginning and David too was the son of man, the possessor of the Psalms,the word of God. Isn't it editing when you say in the beginning there was Jesus.....and Jesus was God yet the verse says Word, my colleague is guilty of what he accuses me of. Also God did not become a burning bush, Exodus state from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on fire it did not burn up. 3 So Moses thought, "I will go over and see this strange sight"why the bush does not burn up."...6 Then he said, "I am the God of your father,[a] the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob." so truly my colleague is guilty of gross editing, God said I am not we are, the bush did not burn up does that mean God became a bush? Another shallow attempt at making God trainee,now God is a burning bush,but Jesus was human so God is a human burning bush,outrageous! Are we supposed to believe that God needs Mary to become human? This is simply refinement of Hindu reincarnation. Because of space,I shall let Scripture be the judge between truth and falsehood/slander of God. And there is no God else beside Me; a just God and a Savior; there is none beside Me. Look to Me, and be saved, all the ends of the earth; for I am God, and there is none else." (Isaiah 45:21-22, Jonah 3:5-10"God is not a man" (Num 23:19) "For I am God, and not man" (Hosea 11:9 For Peter, Jesus was a servant of God (Confirmed In Matthew 12:18..."your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed." (Acts 4:27) "But when the crowds saw this, they were awestruck, and glorified God, who had given such authority to men." (Matt 9:8)..o not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God; trust also in me." (John 14:1)..My God, My God, why have You forsaken me?" (Matt. 27:46) "I ascend to my Father and your Father, and my God and your God." (John 20:17)The temple of my God the name of my God the city of my God.rev 3:12