Chess (Full resolution in first round)

My opponent's entire resolution seems have fallen one one, purely opinion-based, concept that "If you don't love something, there's no point in mastering it." Now, I am going to tear her cute little adorable baby of an argument and then shall reinstate everything that I said (which will be awfully easy considering her single comeback to absolutely all that I said was "If you don't love something, there is no point mastering it."The concept my opponent proposes is this: First love something, then you will have reason to master it.The concept I propose is this: Love only begins after full understanding is achieved. Thus, making a student love chess is inferior to making them master it intellectually.Now I shall tear my opponent's proposal apart.Tell me something you love to do. Do you like to masturbate? Do you like to run? Do you like to kiss? Do you like to play chess?...If you have something in mind, I now would like you to subjectively, and objectively, observe and understand the mechanism of firstly yours, and later everyone's, love. The mechanism of love is something my opponent has erroneously interpreted.No baby loves to masturbate, run, kiss nor play chess. In fact most of baby-life is spent pooping and crying. Then child-life is spent in fantasy land, adolescence is that moody phase (like the phase of a rookie chess player desperately trying to get amazing at the game while constantly losing to masters) and then comes adulthood, the phase where we finally fully grasp what life has granted us great talent at, and thus fall in love with it. Sure we can love football and be an obese father cheering at the sidelines with his family but ultimately that does not better one's ability at the game whatsoever, no more than playing COD makes one an SAS Cadet in the slightest.What love for something originates from, even a person, is when we delve into it without loving at all, when circumstances force us to master it (whether it be running because that's the only thing you seem to have the money to pay good coaching for, whether it's masturbating because that's the you could sufficiently teach yourself to master or chess because you had one of the harshest coaches of all time who made you a god at it. In fact let me abuse DDO itself and ask why RoyLatham and Danielle love debating so much, because their hard work and discipline have made them virtual GODS at the art/activity. People automatically will love whatever they have worked their A$$ off to achieve. you think Usain bolt loved sprinting his whole life? Of course not. It hurts like hell and rips your thigh and upper leg muscles. Sprinting is pure pain and agony intensified to the maximum level and reached at the highest rate possible AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN until you can go at that rate for a little LONGER before that pain kicks in. The drug isn't in sprinting itself, I even would go as far as to say that Usain Bolt still doesn't love to sprint, what he loves is seeing his hard work pay off plain and simple. Whether he was the Michael Jordan of basketball, the Muhammad Ali of boxing, the Stephen Hawking of physics, the Bruce Lee of martial arts, the Christopher Nolan of movie directing or the Michael Zuckerberg of social networking is really irrelevant. The love came after the blood sweat and tears which came without any love or mercy at all.To make a beast at chess, a coach needn't give two sh*ts about their student's love for the game. They must raise the number one chess player, not the number one chess fan. Coaching isn't a fairy-tale and only a few of the human race qualify to be professional coaches at anything BECAUSE it requires brutal harshness.Here is another quote by me:"A coach that is loved should do their job."Plain and simple, you need that motto for life.