Men are better than women.

Where to begin? First of all, making inferences on my potential future arguments based on a semantic point that simply does not matter, and that I stated did not matter, is ridiculous. I stated right at the start that I was attempting to "...argue that, aside from certain things being literally physically impossible for one gender, for example men giving birth, both genders are quite capable of attaining the same skills and qualities as one another to allow them to excel in whichever area they choose to apply their skills." My making a statement that "both genders are necessary for the reproduction of the species, therefore you're wrong" would be a pathetic fallacy with regards to the actual topic. You yourself would pick apart such a statement as though it were a fly, and I would no doubt lose votes due to my pathetic attempt to redirect and then 'win' the debate. "However for numerous biological and evolutionary concerns, the male gender is better suited to ensuring the survivability and technological advancement of the human race." I think that makes it quite clear where your argument is coming from, and is a pretty good indicator of the types of arguments you will attempt to make. Attempting to antagonize me for a statement that *you* worded poorly is pathetic. And as if I weren't clear enough, *I apologized* and stated that it was the semantic equivalent of a slip of the tongue. Move on with the debate. And yes, I *can* conclude that you are attempting to paint me with the idiot brush; the very first thing you proceeded to do after acceptance of the debate was pick apart the way I accepted it to try and show that either I didn't understand the concepts you were using, or that I was attempting to steer the debate into more favorable ground for myself. You could just as easily have ignored the way I worded it, seeing as I was not directly quoting you and had clearly shown that I was prepared to accept any argument you would have made, and continued making your opening arguments. I *accepted* your debate. You stated that you would be arguing, for numerous evolutionary and biological concerns, men being better than women for ensuring the survivability and technological advancement of the human race. At what point would you like to move away from the semantics of how this is worded and actually start to debate that topic? Remember, I was the one who was advocating for taking the time to ensure the debate topic was titled such to be all-inclusive to our argument and very clear on what the debated points were. If at any point you were under the assumption that I was attempting to debate some other topic than the one you decided on and agreed to, you're mistaken. Putting it very simply for you, at no point did I attempt to deliberately limit the points you would have been 'allowed' to make under the terms of the debate, and even if I did you would have been well within your rights to shut me up and continue with your argument regardless of such. The fact that you would rather argue the semantic of the point than the point itself leads me to conclude that you just don't have a leg to stand on. I would much rather you use the *remaining* two rounds to put forward your actual arguments for debate than continue to attempt to delay doing so by indignantly going on and on about how apparently my wording of the way I accepted the debate proves that I don't have a clue as to the real issue being debated. We are not arguing this point any more. You will move on to making your actual points as to the issue at hand. We will keep all other talk of semantics and specific wording to the comment section, if it proves necessary. Are we clear?