God's existence is intrinsically impossible

Rebuttals: Contention One: Cause In physics, the law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system cannot change"it is said to be conserved over time. Energy can be neither created nor destroyed, but can change form, for instance chemical energy can be converted to kinetic energy in the explosion of a stick of dynamite. The law of conservation of mass, or principle of mass conservation, states that for any system closed to all transfers of matter and energy (both of which have mass), the mass of the system must remain constant over time, as system mass cannot change quantity if it is not added or removed. Hence, the quantity of mass is "conserved" over time. The law implies that mass can neither be created nor destroyed, although it may be rearranged in space, or the entities associated with it may be changed in form, as for example when light or physical work is transformed into particles that contribute the same mass to the system as the light or work had contributed. The law implies (requires) that during any chemical reaction, nuclear reaction, or radioactive decay in an isolated system, the total mass of the reactants or starting materials must be equal to the mass of the products. You argue that everything has to have a cause. Otherwise, its existence is intrinsically and scientifically impossible. However, energy (The strength and vitality required for sustained physical or mental activity) and matter (Physical substance in general, as distinct from mind and spirit; (in physics) that which occupies space and possesses rest mass, esp. as distinct from energy) (According to its laws of conservation) neither came from something, nor can be destroyed into nothing. So therefore, this would be self-contradictory. Contention 2: Omnipotence "God cannot do something that is a violation of his own existence and nature. Therefore, He cannot make a rock so big he can't pick it up, or make something bigger than himself. " - Matt Slick [11] So, until done, it would not be contradictory to the claim that God has virtually unlimited authority or influence. Contention 3: Omniscience We define omniscience as the state of being omniscient; having infinite knowledge. So therefore, there is absolutely nothing he does not know. Contention 4: Omniscience/Omnipotence God is often conceived as the Supreme Being and principal object of faith. In theism, God is the creator and sustainer of the universe. In deism, God is the creator (but not the sustainer) of the universe. In pantheism, God is the universe itself. Theologians have ascribed a variety of attributes to the many different conceptions of God. Common among these are omniscience (infinite knowledge), omnipotence (unlimited power), omnipresence (present everywhere), omnibenevolence (perfect goodness), divine simplicity, and eternal and necessary existence. Monotheism is the belief in the existence of one God or in the oneness of God. God has also been conceived as being incorporeal (immaterial), a personal being, the source of all moral obligation, and the "greatest conceivable existent". Many notable medieval philosophers and modern philosophers have developed arguments for and against the existence of God. So therefore, that wouldn't be possible. Conclusion: My opponent presented four contentions in an attempt to show that God is impossible; all four are fatally flawed. I am an Atheist as well as my opponent, but these arguments are outdated and no good. The resolution has not been established. Source(s): . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://en.wikipedia.org... . https://www.google.com... . http://en.wikipedia.org...