Corporatism does not equal Capitalism

It's very common to see people from all of the political spectrums use arguments that favour the idea that capitalism, under the idea of a free unregulated market, has created monopolies and corporations. The left spectrum has constantly used this idea for supporting arguments which state that capitalism is responsible for all the "evils" and poverty in the world caused by corporations and large monopolies, in order to regulate the market, which ironically empowers corporations by making them the only competition and destroys small business which can not afford the costs. Corporatism has constantly advocated for more regulation on the market, and has paid politicans behind the closed doors to ensure that they will make smaller companies which are a dangerous competiton to their objective of increasing their personal wealth, to run out of business with the newly imposed regulations from the government. At this point in my argument, I have proved that corporations have no place in a free unregulated market, and that any argument against used against capitalism which has base revolved around the generation of personal wealth at the cost of the people is incorrect, since to achieve a monopoly over the economy you MUST get rid of the competition. The left has unfortunately created more opression over the people by cracking down on personal rights and destroying competition and innovation in the market using politics as a tool to achieve their "desired society", and empowered blindly and unconciously at their worst enemy with base on arguments that have no sense and relate to opposed ideologies and combining them as one sole. Not only that, but has also falsely attributed free markets as THOSE RESPONSIBLE for the global financial crisis that shook the world in 2008, which has been shown as a myth by Forbes, Acton Institute... and others in the links below: https://www.forbes.com... http://blog.acton.org... https://dailyreckoning.com... https://www.lewrockwell.com... Here is an example of how the word "Capitalism" has been modified to imply personal benefit which doesn't go to enrich the people and the state, rather than explaining the core of capitalism which is lack of regulation over the market: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com... And here we can see the core definition of capitalism in one of the world's "most respected" encyclopedia which carries the tag of "laissez faire" to modify the meaning of the word "Capitalism" with a political objective, as its usual with the orwellian left (and i'm using the word orwellian to mean an ideology that controls language, not authoritarianism): https://en.m.wikipedia.org... And as it is common with all "pedias", another source that separates "capitalism" and its core meaning "free market" as two separate ideas: https://www.investopedia.com... By the sources against my argument mentioned before, I again imply, that the meaning of capitalism has been changed by the left to appease orwellian ideals, with strong support coming from the same corporations that want this to happen, that want to destroy capitalism and competition against them. I repeat again, Corporatism isn't capitalism and capitalism removes the plataform for monoplies to flourish by cracking down on government regulation for the benefit of the people. EDIT:.PS.: My opponent has freedom to choose how he/she will present his argument as I will also take my freedom to present my argument as I deem fit.