NASCAR ought to implement right turns

Okay, so my opponent is saying that my first contention is flawed because of the fact that the best aspect is the wrecks. While preference is subjective, the exact thing that he said about what is best can still be used to my advantage because of the fact that right turns only increase the competitiveness of the sport and actually allow for more opportunities for over-taking other opponents, meaning that it"s even more of a toss-up and keeps the spectators, (both at home and live), interested. So the point regarding gaining more interest among those who currently do not watch the sport still flows to my side because of the fact that this more interesting sport, (all because of the introduction of right turns), makes it more likely to draw a bigger audience from the population still having the same effect as I mentioned would happen even if you agreed that the best aspect of NASCAR was the wrecks. Secondly, he goes on to refute my points by basically describing NASCAR to me and the difference between that and Formula 1 racing; however, I AM NOT arguing for a change in the rules of NASCAR, just the introduction of right turns. All the same rules would apply and the mere presence of right turns would actually better the system as a whole, even as he described it. 1)I did not state it takes no skill to race in an oval-type fashion, just that it would be more difficult for them to actually race on tracks with right turns. And to address your noting of the driver who went from Formula 1 to NASCAR, the transition would be similar for NASCAR drivers to road-racing type tracks; however, there would still be contact between cars still making it difficult to maneuver around turns. The skill-set acquired from racing on tracks with right turns would increase the quality of the races in terms of points as well. With more opportunities to pass other drivers on tracks with right turns, it makes it more even as to who would be in what place, (and this is over the course of multiple races). With a more even distribution of points, point"s races will actually be closer drawing an even bigger crowd because of the anticipation and suspense of who the winner will be in the end. Once again, this ties back in with culture because it draws a larger audience and actually promotes the sense of a unifying culture which is a good thing. Lastly, addressing his attacks on my second contention, he merely mis-interprets the entire point of my second contention. I was stating specifically that people would be less likely to go to races because of the fact that you can"t see the whole race. This is good for the same reasons I listed before. He states that drunken fans are a part of any sport; however, not every sport is played with literally no shade in 90+ degree weather. With people drinking as often as they do in NASCAR in that amount of heat, it is putting the fans at a higher risk of dehydration than any other sport. Also think of the placement of stadiums or arenas for other sports as opposed to NASCAR tracks. They, for the most part, are in the city or are near some major public transportation system. Those drunk fans say at a New York Knicks game can take a cab home whereas drunk fans that leave Charlotte Speedway have to drive to get home or to a place that can take them home. This puts more people that are intoxicated on the streets driving than most any other sport. That"s lives that can be spared by making it less appealing to see in person. Also, he stated that for those that do go see the race, NASCAR can provide their fans with free sunscreen so as to prevent the likelihood of sun poisoning, skin cancer and any other sunlight caused health issue. This is bad because it would be too insane of a request to make speedways provide sunscreen to their attendees. It"s too much money and would not be realistically implemented, and also he stated that since NASCAR is the only sport that has to deal with such a problem, there would be no real reason to give out sunscreen in the first place. So without the introduction of right turns we can see that people would still be at the same amount of risk of skin-related issues. If right turns could save lives, why would you not want it? Saving lives is an inherently good thing therefore right turns maximize the amount of good in a situation making it the best option in today"s round. In conclusion, you should vote for me because I better maximize good outcomes which is inherently good. Right turns maximize competition which increase the fan-base, they maximize the skill-set of those competing making the sport of better quality as well as more entertaining, they reduce not only drunk drivers but also the negative effects of dehydration, and finally it reduces the amount of skin-related problems meaning it save more lives in the long-run.