the tar-21 is a superior weapon to the AR-15

Despite the apparent superior nature of the Tar-21 the country with the most superior military in the world still uses the AR-15 weapon system. One would think if a superior weapon were to exist it would find its way to the American military which uses weapons from every country already. However, they do not use the Tar-21 or any bull-pup assault rifle for that matter. Pro never negated therefore he must affirm the notion that because more countries use the AR-15 it is by definition a far less important weapon. He also never refuted the definition presented for superior which entails importance. Pro did not refute the fact that the trigger mechanism being farther away from the bolt causes a less reactive trigger compared to the AR-15 as well as the fact that it causes shooters to milk the trigger. Pro's only refutation to tat point was the definition of "milking" the trigger and not whether or not this occurs with shooters of the Tar-21. Pro called my claim that the Tar-21 can not be fired on the move was unfounded. However, the Tar-21 has two ejection ports on either side directly above the magazine well. Being a bull-pup this means that ejection ports are adjacent to the face, the port on the opposite side of the rifle ejects casings away from the shooter and the port next to the shooter's cheek ejects casings toward the shooter. To switch the rifle between left and right hand shooting the bolt has to be changed out for bolt that matches (right handed bolt for right handed shooter, left handed bolt for left handed shooter). This being said a shooter can not disassemble his weapon and resemble while taking corners or even at all in most combat situations. Pro also stated that the Tar-21's accuracy is on par with the AR-15 at various ranges. Pro failed to take into consideration the different barrel lengths that drastically change the range and accuracy of even the same weapon. The M4's effective range is 600m and the M16's effective range is 800m and that's the difference between a 18' barrel and a 14.5' barrel. Pro even states that because the bull-pup has the bolt being located in the stock that the recoil is more easily absorbed into the shoulder is 100% correct. It is more absorbed into the shoulder of the shooter compared to the M16 which has a large buffer spring located in the stock that absorbs the recoil allowing more comfortable shooting and control of sustained fire. Pro mentions that the AR-15 doesn't have a ambidextrous charging handle or bolt release. This claim clearly demonstrates the Pro's complete ignorance to the AR-15 weapon system. The charging handle is located at the top of the gun and can be charged with either hand regardless of what hand you shoot with. Also the mag release is directly next to the mag and can be pressed while the same hand pulls the magazine out. Pro has failed to show any valid reason why the Tar-21 is a superior weapon to the AR-15, other than wikipedia. I have shown where Pro clearly does not have an idea on the mechanics of either weapon and can not claim that the Tar-21 is superior to the AR-15. I strongly urge a negative vote on this resolution. Source: http://www.youtube.com...