Resolved: The Christian God Most Likely Doesn't Exist

Defense 1I would like to point out that my claim is not extraordinary. If one says something exists then it is up them to prove that it exists. My opponent says the god of the Bible exists, and yet he has not proven it exists, but rather talked his way around it, and stated a few claims without evidence and has even dropped a few of my arguments. My case still stands, the burden of proof is on my!Defense 2Claiming that someone is either lying or havinf mental issues or holussinations is not personal attack, it is the only thing that could explain it if they didn't actually see Heaven or Hell or anything like that. Furthermore, I can say that exact same question to you. Were you in Israel 2,000 years ago? NO! And my opponent has just helped me by asking this question. If my opponent is to be consistant with his veiws he must agree that all other religious claims of supernatural experiences are false, but he doesn't instead he defends them. So he contradicts hs own Bible and therefore, his own claims of the existence of God. But this again helps me in another way. I contend since this phenomina occurs in every religion it is a natural cause that is causing it, not gods and not spirits. My opponent fails.Defense 3My opponent is now saying that I did not attempt to answer his questions. But there is a problem here...do you know what it is? Do you notice it? Oh yes, I did answer it! And now i'll answer it again but in better terminology. No! I do not have to answer the questions he asked, because those questions do not get at the point of the " Paradox of the Stone". It proves that omnipotence is impossible. It is not whether or not if he should make a stone that he can not lift. It is that he CAN'T! And if he does he still disproves his own self. Omnipotence is impossible and so is the Christian god!Refutation 1My opponent has not responded towards my refutation of the ark, therefore it I will consider it conceded. Furthermore, I dismissed the dead sea scrolls because they are not evidence no more then the Sunna is evidence of Islam or the Book of Mormon is evidence that they are right. It is just not worthy of being addressed.Refutation 2I did answer my opponent's question. First, I proved that the Big Bang actually happened (he disagreed at first), and then I proved that god was not required for that by introducing him to quantum michanics (which he dropped by the way). And furthermore, i'll counter my opponent by stating if the universe had a cause and it did, what is God's cause? If he is all-powerful (already refuted that) and complex then he himself would have to have a cause. However, this is another refutation of his omnipotence, and it contradicts his biblical definition. Therefore, he can't exist.He then accusses me of not presenting evidence when I presented evidence for it in the 'sorces' section of my kast round. He then gives Bible verses that have no reference in it for human defects. Then his video and his point here at the end is really sad because he yet again makes the 'God of the Gaps' fallacy. I will state again, just because we don't have enough knowledge of something doesn't mean god did it.AND I WILL STATE NOW THAT I DIDN'T CONCEDE ANYTHING!Concluding StatementIn my conclusion, I have proven that the universe can come about with God, I have proven that the afterlife is a impossibilty, and I have proven that omnipotence is a impossibilty. My opponent has failed to provide adiquate evidence for the existence of God, and has given two lousey arguemnts without evidence, and has only given one source to back up his claims. I thank those who took the time to read this.