BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
What is the best pixar movie

I am glad that I have seen both movies, and I would warn everyone reading that I might get into spoilers. Now I liked Inside Out, but I did not find it as good as Up. The number one praise of Inside Out is its originality, even though it's not. Let's look at the main motif, personifying emotions and using the human body as the main setting. Herman's Head, Osmosis Jones, Spongebob Squarepants' "Squalliam Returns," and Ned Declassified School Survival Guide's "Getting Organized," along with many other features have played this motif to death. The plot is very similar to Toy Story: A child moves to a new home and owns several sentient concepts that care about the child's life and feelings, and have to face the problem of personality changes and the child aging. The main characters have as much personality as the seven dwarfs. The difference that the dwarfs were in the background, while these emotions are in the foreground. Their predictable behaviors makes their "react" style humor fall flat most of the time, and the rest of the movie had only a few punch lines that made me chuckle. The story is very bland and really predictable (How many times did they bring up the rocket? Like 8? ). The animation inside the head can be really creative at times, but the character design and anything outside the brain is so, so bland. The soundtrack is appealing, but sounds like stock Windows music (). Even the theme (accept your feelings and who you are) was already discussed in Wreck-It-Ralph. It's nothing special. Now let's look at Up. I don't think I need to bring up the first ten minutes,but I'll bring it up anyway. The movie makes you emotionally invested in Carl with barely any dialogue, and a beautiful montage. Up is the ultimate adventure, and the content is very relatable. Look at all the animation and listen to the soundtrack (. https://www.youtube.com...). The comedy is much funnier, and the message behind it is inspirational: You're never too old to accomplish your dreams, your loved ones are always with you in your heart, and you should try to help everyone you can. There's a reason this movie won two out of the five Oscars it was nominated for. Up is far superior.
What is the best pixar movie

First off I would like to say Up is a great movie, but my choice is a movie from the same director: Inside Out. Inside Out succeeds at everything that any Pixar movie can do but does it better. It really is just everything that works in any Pixar movie but better. There isn't much you can really say about it but I can try Inside Out is the best Pixar movie because it's got a great premise, some of the best characters, incredible world building and animation, and the music is just incredible! Everyone usually agrees on the same thing about Up: the first 10 minutes are the best, while everything else isn't as strong. I don't know if I agree with the second half of that statement, but I certainly agree that the first 10 minutes have the most emotional punch. Inside Out, however, does a much better job spreading out that emotional core!
Call of Duty Ghosts Vs. Battlefield 4

First thing I would like to address is that I know you can use Gamertags to talk to teammates however I was talking about enemy players. (I am not sure, but I also believe that in COD you can not see the enemy names unless you kill them I would also Like o point out that my first argument was poorly worded and that may be the reason you took it that way) The second thing I would like to point out is that BF4 (not sure about 3 or Hardline) ,but you can also have up to 4 loadouts per class ,however BF4 does not allow you to have more that one account
Call of Duty Ghosts Vs. Battlefield 4

If you are a gamer that plays call of duty a lot, it can help to have different profiles. You may want to be a different person, or use a whole different set of weapons. Another reason why different profiles are helpful is because you might share the game, and would help tremendously to have other profiles available that are able to be customized. About talking to your teammates, you can do so with the microphone. You can call them by their gamer tag and they should listen.
Call of Duty Ghosts Vs. Battlefield 4

I do like the fact that COD has females and multiple profiles, but I do not beleave something like a shooter needs lots of different avatars. I Like BF4 Because all the every class has their own look and that is their only look.(Other than the fact that you can change camo) For, me and other people I asked it makes it so it is easier to talk to teammates i.e Telling your friend in a tank to take a different route so they can avoid an area with lots of engineers. It also tells you how you should deal with them. Such as if you see a recon you should know not to run at them in a wide open area, but instead go slow in areas with lots of cover and hiding spots.
God Is Real

I believe that god is real because why would everything about god just be made up? Why would someone write an entire book about a god who created the world for no good reason? God has proved to do many miracles such as bring Jesus back to life when he died on the cross. Take the book "Heaven is for real, A Little Boy's Astounding Story of His Trip to Heaven and Back" written by Lynn Vincent and Todd Burpo. If this child hadn't had a trip to heaven, how would he have known about his little sister that died at birth? There is no other logical way that the little boy could have figured that out. Once again as I bring up the bible, why would someone write an entire book for no reason? someone wouldn't write a book for no reason because books back in 1400 BC were very expensive to make. For these reasons I believe that god exists.
God Is Real

Let me summarize this debate in my concluding round. My opponent, in essence , changed the debate from "God is real" to "You can't prove god isn't real!!!". This is a bogus claim. You can't prove unicorns aren't real, Santa isn't real, the list goes on and on. Just because you can't prove something is false doesn't mean it is automatically real. My opponent makes no effort to prove gods existence. All he has done is use the god of the gaps argument (Well what caused the big bang? We dont' know? God must have done it!) and prove that people believe in god. Frankly, I do not care whether or not people believe in god. Many people also do not believe in god. Why would so many people not believe in god? God must not exist right? My opponent has not used any logic in this debate and even admits that he has not proved that god in fact is real in this debate- contrary to the title of this debate. Now what have I proved in this debate? I have proved that there is no evidence for the existence of god. If there were- my opponent would present it and not make the claim that he can't/isn't able to prove god's existence. Evidence such as ancient text or fake trips to heaven do not count as evidence. The fact that catholics have the vatican does not prove that god exists. These are just facts about life. Yes people believe. At one point in time pretty much everyone believed that the earth was flat. We have since proven that to be false. Just because lots of people believe in something- doesn't make this true. My opponent was unable to prove god's existence because there is no evidence for the existence of god. The last thing I will say is that my opponent mistakenly believes that it is my duty to show that without a doubt god cannot exist. However- I am not the one making an outrageous claim. Outrageous claim need to be proven in order to be taken seriously- my opponent has not proven anything. What I have done, however, is show that there is no reliable evidence pointing to the existence of god. Lack of evidence leads to a weak support for the argument that god does exist. And that is when I bring over the question to the folks reading this debate. Do you honestly believe my opponent has proved anything in this debate regarding the fact that god is real? Anything at all? I urge all of you to read through and determine who made more logical sense and who had the stronger arguments. Remember that Pro admitted to not being able to "prove gods realism". With that I end this debate. Thanks to my opponent for participating in this debate and thanks for all that have read this. I trust that everyone will make the right decision in awarding a winner in this debate.
God Is Real

Wait Santa's not real? (I'm joking) In this argument I would like to summarize all my arguments. In my first argument I was explaining logical explanations of why god would be real. I stated that it would be ridiculous to write an entire book about a made up person. I also stated that god has shown many miracles such as bringing Jesus back to life when he died on a cross. I mentioned the book "Heaven is for real, A Little Boy's Astounding Story Of His Trip To Heaven And Back" written by Lynn Vincent and Todd Burpo. You attacked this statement by simply saying "its made up" When really you were not the child when he was on the operating table . You simply skipped to conclusions and by saying it was made up for profit. In my second argument I explained how faith can make a god real. I stated that a human being creates faith, and that if you believe in something, it can be real. Faith does make things real, it was foolish of me to try and prove that god was real when in reality no proof is needed. Everything was made with belief, without it no one would have any courage. Belief is what shows us that we can believe in what we do. In my third argument I discussed how god is a belief. I discussed this because god is a belief that a man brought to everyone attention as he came down to earth (Jesus). I stated that belief is something that can influence others into the same belief. I also stated why most people discourage religion. You stated that it was ridiculous that belief is what makes something real when it really isn't, most religions rely on belief and faith to make it real. In my fourth argument I discussed the universe and its creation. I talked about the big bang. I stated that no one knows how the universe became into creation. How nothing turned into something. I had answered it by saying that God had created the universe and he was the one who caused the big bang. But you see, if god created the universe, this means he was alive or functioning or whatever you'd like to call it before time and the functionality of the universe. Which means that god did not have to be created because he was the original creator. Nothing needed to create god because he was already there, Before everything. In my fifth argument I discussed how the cons reasoning was invalid because his/her reasoning was Invalid, simply because the con was looking through his eyes. I also stated that without gods belief everything would be changed, nothing to look forward to after death, no elections for a pope, none of it would be possible without the belief in god. These are all my arguments that I made during this debate. One other thing thing before I end my side of the round is that, no I have not been able to prove gods realism, but neither have you been able to prove gods unrealism, the con only stated things against god, nothing to prove god not being real.
Russia v. India

My opponent has stated that Russia is bigger, more powerful, richer, and smarter than stinky India. India produces many of the things that we use in everyday life. It"s well known for its products. Diamonds, jewelry, refined petroleum, medication, iron, paper, rice, " the list goes on. If for example, India decides to stop exporting the goods, iron would be more expensive, rice would not be as cheap as it is now, and diamond prices would definitely go up. Medication would be harder to get. This can upend the fragile economy of the US and other countries that rely on these products. The US is the top export destination of India, with $42 billion dollars worth of goods exported every year. Russia mainly exports oils and natural gasses.
Rap battle but you have to dis yourself

Kicked myself out on the street cuz I can't tell the time, My girl just dumped me cuz I can't spit any rhymes, She wants a poet, I'm just a joke, Swallow my feelings so hard it makes me choke. Enough about me, more about you; What's the big idear with your attitude? I get that its a dis track, roast yourself, play me, But you're just a rapist, that's just plain to see. Man with all this rapin' you should see a doctor, Probably got the clap from your ECA proctor, Sleepin with your teacher to make those grades, Weak a*s d*ck game the only way you make A's. Your spelling is a hot mess, your grammar is a wreck, If I had to grade your paper, I'd just yell out "NEXT" Now that I got that off my chest we can rap some, Now that I put you in your place I can beat on my own drum. Let's get dark, talk about my brain, The only place in this world I can misbehave. Always in the darkness, thinking in my thoughts, So sick of always living I got my trachea in knots. Hung myself off the back porch, Boyscouts never failed me, Hanging with a cold corpse, scrapes all on my knees. Sometimes I cut myself just to see how much it bleeds, Because every single night I bite the hand that feeds. Always turn to drugs so I can escape Always out my head so I can simply think straight. Last verse, spittin', call that conclusion Put the beat to rest, it died of heart contusions. Can't even complete your own challenge, I didn't hear a dis track, I heard a rap sheet. Put in you in intensive psychotherapy, I know it won't work cuz you'll blame your family. Less of a dis, more of a confession, See you in the paper cuz of your rape obsession. See you in court, call it sex with aggression, Justify your actions, I'd let you testify, How a grown man gonna act like he's that fly? Proud of the man that d*cks down his canine, You ran out of jokes so you stole one of mine. You can't even rap well, hang up your hat now. Forfeit the game before you get beat, son. This debate's been over, I done already won, Just thought I'd give a Coup D'Etat to say goodbye, Done so fast you ain't done waving "hi" Lyrically murdered this skeevy a*s guy, Okay, I'm done here, let me drop the mic.
Rap battle but you have to dis yourself

I fondle my dogs butt, In which Ill bust a nut, This will readjust its gut. Its just what I do, bumming dogs and sniffin glue. I'll lick its a.s.s and taste its poo. I just love dog puss in ma field of view. There is nothing hotter than dog domination. Where I use its butt as a docking station, And I don't care if there's any cooperation, Because raping the thing is my obligation. I live in a wet box Where I get c*cks, Cus I'm a filthy man whore, Shaggin all the homeless who are post war You'll get ma d*ck through your front door I've even got an anal mentor, who I hate and deplore, Cus I'm a rape victim, They call me "d*cks in" Then they say "I think we tricked him" I drink 18 cans of beer a day, its turned me into a helpless gay, I'm drunkenly paralytic, I have AIDs and I'm diabetic, My burnt face is grossly mutilated, And my fat a.s.s is mostly stimulated I cry myself to sleep every night, I'm real self-conscious about my height, I'm 3 foot 3 and addicted to bestiality, A wider bum hole is my only guarantee.
Rap battle but you have to dis yourself

Ight, bet. Great topic. Kick it back easy, my alcoholic tendencies Feeling real breezy, pissin' in my sheets, see, Hate my life cuz I can't get laid, Cut myself cuz I ain't get paid. Can't keep a job for more than 30 f*ckin' minutes Lose my train of thought whilst I'm spittin' that sentence When I sit in school, I act a fool, and write music with my spare time. I get home and beat my tool, slow jam beat retarded with lyrical rhyme. Blisters on my right hand, Jell-O on my penis Shoulda closed the blinds so that the neighbors couldn't see us Bestial by nature, beating up the p*ssy got caught red handed by PETA, eatin' out my puppy Less of a dis, more of a lie, Killed my last relationship one too many times Can't get the truth straight, can't get my head straight, I'm havin' to decide with pornstar I want to fake impregnate.
Rap battle but you have to dis yourself

Considering I'd know nothing about my opponent I can't dis him/her meaningfully, so it makes sense to dis myself instead and compliment them. Make it as close to reality as possible. -3 wins to accept. -No Jews can accept because they're bias against lord Hitler. Good luck. _____________________________________________________________ My family ______________________________________________________________ My nan gave me a genital wart, she wasn't gentle and ate me out with a fork She began to feast on my butt hole, I farted then shat in a nut bowl. She began to dig around like a mole, felt like I was giving birth to a foal. My granddad is known as my nandad, He's an analific nomad, Jizzing like he's the launch pad. I just stand there with my mouth wide, I let him slip it in the backside, it made him so horny that he died. My mums a lesbian buffalo, she bums me with her big toe, I pick the crusty poo out of her butt hair, it tastes like rust slew so beware. Sold as a sex slave from China, my dad's a 10 year old minor, he lives in my mums vagina. He only eats the jizz that enters her, he tells me this life was meant for ya I used to finger his young bum, but he dead now so I got no where to cumm He's rotting in my mums fanny, while she squatting on a Pakistani. R.I.P father
You slice the Cake, I pick the first piece.

The above is not the actual resolution I am debating, it is a metaphor that sets the terms of this challenge.. My opponent shall write the resolution, any resolution they please. I then choose which position on it I will argue (So I may or may not be the actual "Pro" in this debate). So, I advise you to only accept this debate if A. You are a traditional debate wonk who is willing to argue any position, or B. you are quite sure the resolution is one on which I'll actually disagree with you on (my profile should be complete enough that it won't be hard to tell for most debates). There is a hidden third possibility I would also advise you to take the challenge under, but I won't be telling you what that third possibility is, just to mess with your head :D. Feel free to disregard the stated or implied advice, so long as you comply with the terms of the challenge, if you think you know some other good way to go about it :D The resolution cannot pertain to the topic of free will. Other than that, go wild.
You slice the Cake, I pick the first piece.

" morally-according to moral rules; virtuously http://dictionary.reference.com...; Note that this is self-referential and thus begs the question. " How can ending the life of someone be morally acceptable? It cannot. It is that simple. Morality is based on ethical, moral, and virtuous conduct. Killing another person is immoral, unethical, and goes against morality." Again, you are begging the question. The dictionary here is too-- it's definition is not a definition, it explains nothing. Morality , in non self-referential terms, refers to the codification of the pursuit of values. Killing a person who harms one's values is helpful in attaining them, and thus moral unless it costs more value. "One example is the Ten Commandments. Does thou shall not kill ring a bell? " The ten commandments saying so does not make anything true. "That's what the death penalty does, it kills" Yes, it kills the guilty, to save valuable innocent lives. " The Bible is a fundamental basis of morality for Christians," Fixing that statement: Christians think it is the basis of morality. This does not make it true. The founder of Christianity died painfully on a cross, and Christians regard this as necessary to their system. Dying painfully on a cross is not a value, indeed, it removes several values. "nd as a major religion, it should be respected in that aspect" Ad populum. "but this only serves as an example. For other religions, the inherent right to live is being violated by the death penalty, hence it is not morally acceptable." Religion, i.e., listening to mad mystics instead of your mind, is a means of losing value-- it is immoral. " There have been countless cases where the person killed by the death penalty was in fact innocent." And you can demonstrate this? More important, you can demonstrate this is intrinsic and unavoidable? More important yet, you can demonstrate a superior alternative? "Although the death penalty does not always kill people who are not guilty, there is always the chance where the person on death row may actually be innocent, thus making the death penalty not morally acceptable, for it is not virtuous or ethically correct to possibly end the life of an innocent." Since taking someone's life away by sending them to prison for the rest of it is equally immoral, it follows from this premise that we should never imprison anyone either, for fear of the possibility of being wrong. This is obviously nonsensical, we will be wrong much more often if we do not attempt to apprehend the guilty, because the guilty will kill with impunity. "And, the utilization of the death penalty enforces the idea that the convicted person has not been forgiven for their action." This is a good thing. Mercy and forgiveness to the guilty is treason to the innocent. "It is morally unacceptable to disregard the natural rights and respect towards another person." The person who is guilty of violating another's rights, in so doing, loses any claim to their own rights-- they have none left to violate.
You slice the Cake, I pick the first piece.

I shall present my view of the resolution. death penalty-a sentence of punishment by execution. . http://dictionary.reference.com... execution-the act or an instance of putting to death or being put to death as a lawful penalty . http://dictionary.reference.com... Therefore, the death penalty is an act of putting to death as punishment. morally-according to moral rules; virtuously . http://dictionary.reference.com... acceptable-capable of being endured; tolerable; bearable . http://dictionary.reference.com... How can ending the life of someone be morally acceptable? It cannot. It is that simple. Morality is based on ethical, moral, and virtuous conduct. Killing another person is immoral, unethical, and goes against morality. One example is the Ten Commandments. Does thou shall not kill ring a bell? That's what the death penalty does, it kills. The Bible is a fundamental basis of morality for Christians, and as a major religion, it should be respected in that aspect, but this only serves as an example. For other religions, the inherent right to live is being violated by the death penalty, hence it is not morally acceptable. There have been countless cases where the person killed by the death penalty was in fact innocent. The death penalty is responsible for killing innocent lives and enforces the point that the convicted person of the punishment has not been forgiven for their action. Although the death penalty does not always kill people who are not guilty, there is always the chance where the person on death row may actually be innocent, thus making the death penalty not morally acceptable, for it is not virtuous or ethically correct to possibly end the life of an innocent. And, the utilization of the death penalty enforces the idea that the convicted person has not been forgiven for their action. It is morally unacceptable to disregard the natural rights and respect towards another person.