abortion is wrong

okay I accept you have made some good points but still I argue, 1) I did not state clearly how the mother got the illness, maybe they only discovered that she had for example, cervical cancer during her pregnancy. and cancer isn't the only thing here it could be a serious illness or even a mental illness like severe depression. your comment " First of all I don't know why a cancerous women would be having sex," was quite inhumane as all humans ill or not have the right to have sex. and " Ethicly it would be a mother value to put a child's life before her own, out of lofe for him/her" I'm not saying that any loving and caring mother out there would not die for their children, but here maybe the fetus is only 10 weeks old, can this technically be called a baby ? The martyr could be leaving behind a young family, to deal with the death of the mother is this fair ? The illness of the mother could also affect the health of the baby. 2) the handicap thing. I did quote " a serious handicap mentally/physically" I am not saying that all disabled children and adults are not deserving of a life, that is an example of manipulating my words to make them sound cruel. what I mean is, if the child is going to be born and live for a week because its got this illness which isn't curable, isn't it more cruel to make it live for that week of pain rather than having to go through the obvious emotional distress of an abortion. and I didn't use the downs syndrome suffers as an example either. I am not saying that the disabled and handicapped cannot live a life, but serious cases whereby the child wouldn't have any sort of fulfilled life then I feel it is more human to let that child rest before any pain is felt at all. 3) I said " poor quality of life" and used living on the streets as an example. it could be that the mother and father are drug addicts or child abusers. the existing family could also suffer as a result of extra expenses the baby needs. yes I adoption is a choice and I'm not saying that adopted children aren't happy, but there's always going to be something missing in their life some questions that cannot be answered like "why didn't my mummy want me " which could eat a child inside out. i am not saying that we can predict the future, but i also think that if a child is going to seriously suffer in life because of uncontroble things, then it is less cruel to terminate it. even strict catholics and buddhists have compassion for women and the value of thier life. what if for example 1) the mother is a victim of rape and having a child would cause huge emotional turmoil 2) the mother is sexually abused as a child 3) the father of the child is abusive and violent towards its mother. one final point. for example, you are a 22 year old women, just got out of uni and youve got a brilliant job, your newly married with a 1 year old. you found out you were pregnant 2 months ago and youve been to the doctor and hes told you, you have cervical cancer and have two options are you truthfully saying that you would be able to give all of that up for a baby your not likely to meet. i bet over half of people would say they would and they actually wouldnt, because sometimes you've just got to be a little bit selfish. over and out my friends :)