Christianity can be proven as fact

Con: "If the bible was the word of god you would expect it be be very easy to understand and written in a clear and obvious manner." (Matthew 13:13) "This is why I speak to them in parables: "Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand." In Matthew 13:19 Christ tells them literally what the parable meant. Why did He tell THEM? They seek God and do not seek to stand against Him. Christ is clear. Those who do not seek God will not ever and are not meant to ever understand. This is how God speaks in the Bible, in the language that He and His child only speak. This is a concept that the secular world does not understand, and according to God cannot understand. * Con: "The genealogies of Joseph in Matthew and Luke disagree significantly." Matthew is tracing the primary/ biological, lineage while Luke is tracing while taking into account occurences of “levirate marriage". https://en.m.wikipedia.org... * Con: "All of the gospels disagree on who found the empty tomb." It's neccessary to keep in mind that a partial report is not a false report. Just because each gospel author doesn't report every detail of a story doesn't mean it's wrong. If Mary found the empty tomb, then told others, the story would be told as "that Mary found the empty tomb with so many angels." If Mary Magdeline comes along later and finds the tomb empty, then tells others, their story is Magdeline found the empty tomb with so many angels." Neither report is false. People tell the story from their perspective. What we have by having different accounts of the stories, are accounts we know were not purposefully altered to fit nicely together, but honest reports of events. * Con: "The fabricated scriptures at the end of Mark." No one can tell us what was "fabricated" without being there themself. * "And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come." (Matthew 24:14) The gospel "good news" is not a series of books and loads of information. It is a tiny amount of information. 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 combined with Romans 10:13 are the gospel. If nothing else were conveyed but these verses, the gospel would give us reason and salvation with no other information at all. "Everyone who calls on the name of the LORD will be saved." (Romans 10:13) * Con: "Christians have died handling serpents in this manner, many have died of poisoning, and many have died after being prayed for." We have no idea who these people are, what they believed, their motives, nor their actual faith. The Bible is also clear to never test God. Con: "They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them." These are also words of a person who spoke in allegories. Christ called the Pharisee priests snakes and vipers and told the disciples to "drink His blood", (which was wine)neither of which were literal speech. He spoke of "raising the temple after it was destroyed". He was speaking of Himself. HE was the temple. * The Council of Nicaea was composed of about 300 members from every work of life. They came up with a creed that they could agree defined the point of the gospel. Christ is God. Christ died for sins. Christ rose from the dead. Accept Christ for salvation. The gospel is simple. The council came together in this manner because there was dispute being caused between the Orthodxy and what was taught by Arius. The canon was not created by the Council of Nicaea, but was called to come to a common ground between the 2 factions. It was a mediated discussion. In the end the council agreed on what they felt was heretical vs nonheretical. The canon was already established before the council. An "official canon" was defined later, but was already established as the doctrine prior to the "official canon". The books of the canon of the New Testament were written namely in the first century. * Con: "the council undoubtedly preferentially selected the gospels that were favorable to the Romans, the ones that made them look good." The Bible indicates that the Antichrist/Throne of Satan comes from the Roman empire. Not very flattering...Why didn't they erase Revelation 2:13 which speaks in the worst of possible lights against Pergamist, so calling it the "throne of Satan"? Especially seeing that in 324 AD, Constantine chose Byzantium to be the capital of the Roman Empire, naming it New Rome. It would be logically inconsistant to change the canon to make the Roman Empire "look good" while it claimed you the "seat of Satan" himself, seeing it was a Christianised empire. * Sheikh Hussein, Top Shiite Cleric in Damascus, Syria - "I think the time has come for us in the Islamic world to stop asking if Jesus Christ died and to start asking why...” https://en.m.wikipedia.org... * There are many questions that get tough for the atheist. One is the estimates of the world's population quickly turning into hardly anyone only a few thousand years back. Why is the history of the modern human being so short? Where did all of these languages(6,200) come from in such a short time? Have the New Atheists been deceived and sold a bill of goods? https://en.m.wikipedia.org...; The big seller of the New Atheism was Darwinian evolution. Richard Dawkins had stated that it "was a fact" in order to get a plethera of coverts and raise a generation of Atheists. Yet many scientists completely reject it as even being worthy of being called a scientific theory. It defies the fossil record and the Cambrian record. For example, the prominent secular molecular biologist named David Berlinski was an exposer of the theory through testing and the fossil record fully rejecting darwinian evolution saying it has zero evidence for being true. Atheists were sold a bill of goods. *I have so far demonstrated:1)Atheists have been lied to in order to sell them a particular dogma. 2)Islam fulfills prophecy in improbable ways.3)Christ offered an omniscient report of how the gospel history would be before there was a religion at all.4)The equations used to describe the reality of our universe are simply "Hammin's Binary Self Correcting Error Code"5)The world populations and young history of intelligent humanity going into the past demands a dramatic move to get to where we are today.6)Muslims, not Christians are seeing the divine Christ in dreams in massive numbers.