The trinity is a false teaching

Now onto the arguments 1) God says he is the one and only My whole point in this (sorry I couldn't get you to understand it), was to show that yes 3 things can be one, however if the 3 things are talking to each other [. .. ] they aren't one. But, entirely different entities (if they were one, no conversation would be needed. .. .what would they have to discuss aloud if they share a brain? ). In introducing the second solution was to show that if 2 or more are present at the same time, they are seperate and not the same. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2) Bible writers would make it clear that they are all one There is no reason to negate this. Jesus does say he is God's son [. .. ] but the argument is that esus never DIRECTLY said he was God's equal! He refers to him as a father (which clearly means he is under God. People on the same level as anyone else would not claim a position under). __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3) No one else in the bible is called the ALMIGHTY No Jesus is not. (the only response for you saying he is, with nothing else there. ) __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4) God couldn't be tempted to join a cause against himself Obviously, if these three things are in fact one, if one changes, then they are all for hell, right? God being the SUPREME BEING that the bible says he is, would then be in control of hell. However, the devil is in hell to get out from God's control, is he not? This said, he wouldn't tempt God to come and rule hell, he would only tempt a HUMAN MESSENGER. Not God becaus it would be counterproductive to his cause (to also be a ruler of something or to be more powerful than God). So I repost this contention in hopes that you will ACTUALLY ADDRESS ALL PARTS:: Jesus is spoken of as being "tempted by the Devil. " After showing Jesus "all the kingdoms of the world and their glory," Satan said: "All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me. " (Matthew 4:8, 9) Satan was trying to cause Jesus to be disloyal to God. But what test of loyalty would that be if Jesus were God? Could God rebel against himself? No, but angels and humans could rebel against God and did. The temptation of Jesus would make sense only if he was, not God, but a separate individual who had his own free will, one who could have been disloyal had he chosen to be, such as an angel or a human. On the other hand, it is unimaginable that God could sin and be disloyal to himself. "Perfect is his activity . . . A God of faithfulness, . . . righteous and upright is he. " (Deuteronomy 32:4) So if Jesus had been God, he could not have been tempted. —James 1:13. Not being God, Jesus could have been disloyal. But he remained faithful, saying: "Go away, Satan! For it is written, 'It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service. '"—Matthew 4:10. Jesus was tempted to turn against God (meaning he was suppose to revolt against God and God's cause). Now, how can someone join a war against something that he is? IT'S IMPOSSIBLE! YOU CAN'T. If you join the other side, that's what you are. .. the other side. You can't in turn lead something against yourself [. .. ] if you're not there anymore! That's what this is saying. ============================================================================ 5) Jesus being God would be counterproductive to his cause (the argument you made against this, changes it into a completely different creation, so i've turned it into contention 6) But what I can do is refute the arguments you made against my 3rd contention, in this one (because this is where it fits) < >"As a major part of his teaching ministry was to teach humility it would not have been wise to refer to Himself as 'God Almighty'. He is, however, explicit, in aligning Himself with God the Father. " Now, how is it not wise to refer to himself as God, but then to: (A) Refer to God as his father and saying God is the ONLY true God (B) Talk to God while he was on the cross and tell him to forgive the people who've betrayed him (C) Ask God why God has "forsaken" him while he was on the cross (meaning he's talking to someone completely different and other than himself) and (D) Ask God to not make him have to go through his suffering in the garden before his capture ? ?? ? Makes a lot of sense. That wouldn't be wise, but confusing you into believeing that there are three Gods,thus, resulting in damnation for believing in more than one God IS WISE? You say the key to understanding this is knowing that Jesus became fully human without sinning. But, there is no such thing as "FULLY" human without sinning. First off, I don't even think Jesus The Prophet (what he should go by) was sinnless, and I don't understand how you think he was. HIS LIFE IS MISSING FROM AGE 12 TO AGE 33! ! The ages where people go out and "have fun (sin)" are completely left out of the bible. How can you ignore the fact that, that may mean he wasn't "oh so holy" as we expected? If you were to read a book about me where it said "David Angelo Snell Jr has stated he is God. He healed people, fixed people, and cured people," then it left out all of my years from 12 to the year before i die and said He was SINLESS, WOULD YOU THEN BE COMPELLED TO BELIEVE IT? What if I got a group of 12 friends (Romi, Scott, Michael, Tonish, Johnny, Cody, Ramen, Austin, Shavey, Sean, Chris, and Tommy) to vouch for me, then I also added in a few family members and random people I've had a positive impact on to vouch also, would you believe it then? __________________________________ 5) Jesus being God would be counterproductive to his Cause "Jesus, WHILE He was on earth had only the same powers as a man. That means He had to pray like the rest of us"~You Did he not perform miraculous miracles? Did he not make the blind, see; the paralyzed, walk; the dead, rise; GUESS NOT. So because you haven't attacked this YET IN FOUR ROUNDS. .. Here ya go for one more shot: Jesus being God would be counterproductive to his cause ONE of the main reasons why Jesus came to earth also has a direct bearing on the Trinity. The Bible states: "There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus, who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all. "—1 Timothy 2:5, 6. Jesus, no more and no less than a perfect human, became a ransom that compensated exactly for what Adam lost—the right to perfect human life on earth. So Jesus could rightly be called "the last Adam" by the apostle Paul, who said in the same context: "Just as in Adam all are dying, so also in the Christ all will be made alive. " (1 Corinthians 15:22, 45) The perfect human life of Jesus was the "corresponding ransom" required by divine justice—no more, no less. A basic principle even of human justice is that the price paid should fit the wrong committed. If Jesus, however, were part of a Godhead, the ransom price would have been infinitely higher than what God's own Law required. (Exodus 21:23-25; Leviticus 24:19-21) It was only a perfect human, Adam, who sinned in Eden, not God. So the ransom, to be truly in line with God's justice, had to be strictly an equivalent—a perfect human, "the last Adam. " Thus, when God sent Jesus to earth as the ransom, he made Jesus to be what would satisfy justice, not an incarnation, not a god-man, but a perfect man, "lower than angels. " (Hebrews 2:9; compare Psalm 8:5, 6. ) How could any part of an almighty Godhead—Father, Son, or holy spirit—ever be lower than angels? If you've demolished my complete arguments [. .. ] Why do so many still stand? How can you ask me to provide scripture, then when I do, state that it's irrelevant?