Odinism is better than Christianity (or any other Abrahamaic faith)

My opponent claims that Odinism is not morally superior to Christianity because Modern Christians are hypocrites about their religion, and don't engage in the kind of practices that they used to- like killing pagans, burning witches, or stoning gay people to death. However, this doesn't change the religion itself- all it means is that Modern Christians aren't abiding by their religion anymore: Modern Christians cherry picking the bible to make it into some lovey-duvey handbook for new age hipsters doesn't make the book itself morally or logically any different- to say that it does is completely idiotic. Furthermore, it's not like Modern Christians are just these wonderful moral people because of Christianity- but rather inspite of it. Because even after hundreds of years of reformation, Christians are still blowing up abortion clinics and killing gay people- it's far worse in the Muslim World because Islam never had a reformation, but you don't find Atheists doing that sh*t in the name of 'there is no God.' Many Christians may be good people, but we're not talking about the morality of most Christians today, we are talking about the morality of the bible itself- and it still says to kill gay people, kill people who work on the Sabbath, and kill people of other religions. So with that out of the way, let's talk about the moral standards of these two belief systems, starting with Odinism. The values of Odinism as set up in the 9 noble virtues are entirely logical precepts that do have to do with moral behavior, they are: courage, truth, honour, fidelity, discipline, hospitality, self reliance, industriousness, and perserverence. Odinists are encouraged to think for themselves, stand for for what they believe is right, act honourably, and not to mooch on others. On the other hand, most of the 'morals' in the bible are just useless rules made up by primitive dimwits- rules like Leviticus 19:27: "Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard." Or Deuteronomy 22:11: "Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woollen and linen together." Or Deuteronomy 14:8: "And the swine, because it divideth the hoof, yet cheweth not the cud, it is unclean unto you: ye shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcase." Or Leviticus 20:13: "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Or Leviticus 19:28: "Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD." As a matter of fact, there are 613 commandments in the bible, and most of them are trivial bullsh*t rules that don't deal with anything of consequence- except for a few verses like Numbers 31:17-18: "Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." Or Deuteronomy 20:17: "But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee." So let me get this straight- voluntarily having sex with another adult of the same gender is an evil sin deserving of eternal damnation, but raping kids who are incapable of consent- that's Ok. An adult voluntarily choosing to get a tattoo- that's a heinous crime, but mutilating a children's genitals and disfiguring him for life without his consent- that's just fine and dandy. To sum this up- Odinism values actual virtues that actually have to do with moral or immoral behavior, whereas the bible is just an ancient book of desert fairy tales made by and for primitive dimwits, that espouses rules and values that not only have nothing to do with good morals or ethical conduct, but actually advocate heinous conduct and backwards morals, completely incompatible with civilization. Of course most Christians don't engage in these practices any more, but Christians not abiding by their own evil book does not change the book itself. I'd like to finish this point off with a quote from Thomas Paine: "Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness, with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon, than the word of God. It is a history of wickedness, that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind; and, for my part, I sincerely detest it, as I detest everything that is cruel." - Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason, Part 1 Section 4 My opponent claims that 'There are Billions of Christians in the world living very good lives doing wonderful thing everyday. If the faith caused as much evil as you portrayed I think life as we know it would be allot different then it is today. I don't know how many people are living the way of Odin and if they were I'm not sure how much good they're doing.' Just because most Christians are living moral lives doesn't change the nature of Christianity itself- most neonazis don't want to kill Jews, and many of them manage to live moral lives, but that doesn't mean that Nazism isn't evil. The resolution of this debate is that Odinism is logically and morally superior to Christianity, not that Pagans are more logical and moral than Christians, although they are. Furthermore- do you know why there aren't very many people following Odinism anymore- Europe was originally pagan after all. I'll tell you why- because Constantine and Charlemagne ran around Europe slaughtering them and forcing them to join the church- that's why. It was the Catholic Church, not the Odin Brotherhood, that sponsored the rise of fascism in Europe in the 20th Century, Bush Jr. claimed that Jesus told him to invade Iraq, not Odin, and it was a Christian nut who blew up those abortion clinics in Boston in December of 1994, not a pagan. Finally- if this debate were about what the best flavor of ice cream is, then my opponent would be able to claim that 'I don't believe we can conclude that either is indeed superior but both being equally subjective to opinion,' but this isn't a debate about ice cream, is it? This is a debate about two religious belief systems, both of which claim that they are correct and that the other is false. Since this debate was about which religion was more logical and moral, there is no room for opinion here. If I claimed that I like Odinism better than Christianity, that would be opinion, but I didn't. I claimed that Odinism is logically and morally superior to Christianity, and I believe that I have sufficiently demonstrated that.