Theory of evolution is valid

So, you refuse to cite a credible, scientific journal backing you up on this code nonsense. Surprise, surprise. Nowhere did I refuse to accept the Dahpne Major flood and its effect; it's obvious that you are trying to extend this specific example to the past; and you need evidence of this. And surprise, surprise, you have not given any evidence to back up your implication. Yes, you quote-minded Darwin. Unlike you, I quoted the whole passage of what Darwin actually stated, and that passage I quoted gave context to Darwins' quote, because you know. I don't quote-mine people. Because that's dishonest. I have given you a basic rundown of the evolution of the eyes, and your entire argument is to scream that eyes are complex. Whilst I have given a credible journal to back up the evolution of the eyes, as well as Wikipedia, which does a much more general run-down of the issue, the best you have to offer is to state that the eye is complex. I don't think I need to state which one of us has the better argument here; it's self-evident. "This isn't a debate of politeness, you clarified that in your initial post in which you threaten to eviscerate your opponent, yet when you begin to feel yourself losing traction you try to play the blame game and frame me as the rude one. " So I bring you up on your quote-mine about Darwin, and for some weird reason, you thought it would be a good idea to... Paraphrase-mine me? You just made up a new logical fallacy. Congratulations, you've just stooped to a whole new level of ineptitude. Let's take a look at what I *actually* stated, shall we? "If you want to make a case for a different definition for evolution, go for it, but know that if you use "kinds" to classify populations of organisms in your definition of evolution, I will have no choice but to completely eviscerate your definition from the top down, thus showcasing it for being utterly void of any scientific applicability and therefore rendering it useless." I did not state that I would eviscerate my opponent in the original post. I said that I would eviscerate my opponents' *definition* if they thought that defining differing populations of organisms as "kinds" would be a good idea. Nowhere in that did I state that I would eviscerate my opponent. Let's take another look at a quote I made, shall we? "No-one is stating that every step has been found, nor will it ever be. We do not need to find every missing link to know that evolution has taken place. That's an absolutely impossible standard to set anyways. It's a simplified version of how eyes progressed, yes, but it does eviscerate your "argument" from complexity. Whilst all you have done here is scream to the rooftops about how complex the eyes are, I've actually given evidence to support the claim that this was a gradation." I stated here that I eviscerated your *argument from complexity.* Nowhere have I ever stated that I would eviscerate a person, because for starters I'm not a psychopath. Not only that, people can look through the comments of this debate and see that you called me a coward for refusing to let you gish gallop all over me; if you want to go on about who's been rude, it's plainly obvious that the only person who has been bumptious throughout the entirety of this discourse, is you - you were the one who was first to use insults. Alas though, judging by your refusal to admit culpability for your Darwin quote-mine, and on top of that, you attempt to drag my name through the mud by claiming that I will eviscerate people (which is an absolutely laughable claim), I am calling it as it is; you are a habitual fabulist. Throughout the entirety of our discussions, your mannerisms have been egregious, your debating "tactics" have been utterly deplorable, your arguments have been pitiful, you have refused to give me competent scientific journals on an issue when asked and you have been disingenuous in the extreme. I find myself ending this debate on a rather sad note - as is common with many creationists, you're arrogant, dishonest and you seem to lack self-awareness. I award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul.