Barack Obama has views contradictory to Libertarianism

My oponent affirmed my proposition by stating "Of course, Barack Obama has views that differ from Libertarianism" I will continue to argue why Libertarians should not support a socialist like Obama, however, him having a single issue contradictory to Libertarianism is enough to affirm my proposition- making me win the debate. As far as I see it, my opponent has conceded. Just because Obama can win does not mean that he will make a good president, especially from a Libertarian standpoint. Obama plans to remove several Liberties from us, and does not support Libertarian policy in general. I will bring up my objections to his policy, some of which may contradict CON's list of 'good' things he plans to do. -he defended the New Deal social welfare policies of Franklin D. Roosevelt, associating Republican proposals to establish private accounts for Social Security with Social Darwinism -- The new deal was a policy of socialism, it was essentially a quiet socialist revolution. -Obama stated that he opposed education vouchers for use at private schools because he believes they would undermine public schools. -- Vouchers are something Libertarians and economic conservatives would use as a negotiation, a compromise between a socialized school system and a free market one. Obama does not support this, as he wants to keep his government monopoly in check. This is contradictory to the views of Libertarians. - He has energy policies that are in favor of government subsidization of 'alternative' fules. He also wants to force auto-makers to have 50MPG cars (min) by 2030. (NOTE: he also plans to reduce carbon emissions by 80% by 2050- something that would take a huge hit on our economy, but something that he can't realistically achieve now.) - Obama supports, to some extent, socialized health care. Socialization of private industries contradicts Libertarianism. - Obama supports heavy taxation of the rich, something that when done in europe forced hard working Europeans to flea. - Obama ignorantly supports a plan so that all employees at wal-mart will be able to live as if they were upper middle class citizens, allowing them to pay for their childrens college and their retirement- assuming a permanent job at walmart. Not only is this idealistic, it is absolutely impossible. The only way for him to attempt to realize this would be to raise minimum wage more so than it is already. - Obama supports a border fence, blocking people from coming into our country is not a Libertarian policy, and those Libertarians who support tough immigration policies only do so because of people like Obama, who would like us to live in a socialist utopia. - Obama's foreign policy is very similar to that of Bush, however he supports going to war in different parts of the world- such as in Iran or to some extent Darfur. -Obama supports the ADA, as well as other policies that unfairly force businesses to keep up with strict, impossible regulation just in case somebody with a disability might come into their shop. - Obama is very anti-gun, supporting the sale of almost all guns. Clearly, violating the constitution and one of the important foundations of Libertarianism is anti-libertarian and anti-liberty. This very issue is enough to not support him for President. - Obama is in support of the 2006 version of the Patriot Act, which he voted for. He also said that he would support a law banning the burning of flags. Clearly he does not support the Libertarian cause, but his policies go so far against the causes of Libertarianism, especially as defined by the LP (which you claim to be a member, or at least in support of) that it is impossible to honestly vote for him and call yourself a Libertarian without staring hypocrisy in the face.