There Is No Need To Believe In God!

Thanks for your argument Con:Though there is an awful lot that I totally Disagree With:1: Use of The Bible as evidence for belief in God:The Bible is insanely wrong about almost everything and is non-applicable to the modern world.Genesis was totally wrong in it's conception of everything natural.Genesis 1:1 was wrong, God did not create the Heaven and The Earth, it was formed by collisions of meteorites and asteroids.Genesis 1:2 "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters."If the earth was void and without form, it would not hold water, and since the Sun had not been created, it would not be water, but ICE as according to Genesis, there was no source of heat nor light.Not to mention the wrong sequences of things being created and the naivety in that it considers both the Sun and Moon as sources of Light, when in fact only the Sun is a source.Besides, the Bible describes the Earth as a Flat Disc with a Dome (Heaven) over it, sort of like a Snow globe or like the world of Truman on "The Truman Show".The Bible thinks stars are glued to the underside of this dome (supported by pillars) possibly with silly putty, and if the dome or it's pillars are shaken, the stars will break free from their silly putty and fall to earth: Revelations 6:13 "and the stars in the sky fell to earth, as figs drop from a fig tree when shaken by a strong wind." Source: http://passionateproject.blogspot.com.au...This is how the Bible viewed the cosmos, as the Flat Earth Society also gained it's conception of the Earth from the Bible. So as anybody can see, when discussing reality, the Bible has little knowledge of it.Even Leonardo da Vinci questioned the Genesis Creation model, as he knew it was false back in the 16th century, it is totally useless now.As I have already stated in my opening discussion, I've read the entire Bible and found it ludicrously Naive and Stupid.So as far as NEED to believe goes, the Biblical God is out of the Question.Which makes all of Con's Creationist (Bible based) links non-sequitur.If there is a God, it is definitely not the one described in the Bible, as I've already mentioned in my opening statement.Because the Bible was written by men who had little knowledge of anything practical, they knew nothing of science and there is no scientific knowledge of any value in the Bible, except for Leviticus where insects have 4 legs. Ha Ha. Though it is only useful for making people laugh, once only, and after that it becomes a sad reminder of people in a time where they probably couldn't count past 4.The Christian Bible is scientifically inept and so are the Creationists who try to draw scientific parallels from it.They are no more practical than the Flat Earth Society, who both have the same Biblical Earth image, as shown above.If a God does exist, it would more likely be like the Deistic or Agnostics God, unattached to this planet and unknowable by humans.More like the God of Spinoza and Einstein, simply started the laws of physics and not even interested in humankind.For such a Cosmic Being, which has no interest in humanity, souls, nor Humans concepts of Good and Bad/Evil, such a God would not care for whether humans believe in it or not.Thus, with such a Cosmic Agency, there no need for us to believe in it.Sources for Flat Earth in the Bible:http://www.student.oulu.fi... Though apart from the Stupidity of the Creation story in the Bible, there is even more stupidity in the Earth's Population and Morality of the Bible.So Here is a presentation of the Immorality of The Bible, which is Condoned by the Idiotic Bible God. Genesis is also Extremely Immoral, thanks to help from it's God.Satan in the Bible was more Moral than God's chosen ones, such as Lot.Enjoy!Thanks again Con.Over to you!