Should creationism be taught in schools? (Evolution vs Creation)

I apologize but half of my argument for round 3 didn't show up. EvolutionEvolution may not explain where the first life came from. That is still a big mystery that nobody knows yet. Again you are saying that Evolution is a theory. I mentioned before, a scientific theory is different from the dictionary definition of a theory. Scientific theories are pretty much one of the highest things obtainable in Science. Scientific theories are hypothesis supported by lots of experiments and studies. It's like saying that Bill Gates is "just a multi-billionaire." If microevolution is happening all around us, how is macro-evolution not true? It's pretty much common logic. Micro-evolution is confirmed and micro-evolution never stops. After a long period of time, lots of microevolution will happen to an organism which just is another way of saying macro-evolution. They are the SAME THING, just different amounts of time. EducationI'm starting to get confused on your definition of creationism. By creationism, I am referring to the belief that god created everything in the beggining and Evolution is false. Theistic-evolution and creationism are different things, I think religious people should be taught to accept theistic-evolution instead of creationism. Theistic evolution is the belief of God and the belief of Evolution. Creationism has represented a lot of the world's thought and for the longest time, Creationism was the primary model for how we came. However, today's scientific age disproves Creationism and poses a more valid model, Evolution. People believed in many things in the past that have been disproven in today's society.DebateCreationism is the belief that everything was there from the start and was created by god. Evolution is how organisms change over time. There is nothing to disprove Evolution but lots to disprove creation. Theistic and naturalistic Evolution may vary depending on someone's religious beliefs but Evolution can not be rejected right now. Creation should not be taught in school because it is completely FALSE. Science means knowledge obtained through study and/or practive. Science is reality, you can't ever go against science. Going against science is going against reality and creationism is a belief that goes against science. Theistic EvolutionI understand that some people may be religious and/or believe in a higher power. Theistic Evolution is the belief that Evolution exists but a higher power also exists and they may have possible created evolution and may be controlling evolution. If someone is religious, they should be taught accept the Theistic Evolution model instead of the Creation model. Theistic Evolution is reasonable because it's the belief of god or a higher power without the denial of science. Young Earth CreationismYoung Earth creationism makes no sense. The Earth can't be 6000 years old, we have more than enough evidence to prove this. I don't even think the Bible said the Earth is 6000 years old, rather it is a false interpretation of the Bible.Conclusion Evolution should be taught as a fact UNLESS there is evidence to disprove Evolution. If you can find evidence that explains why there are different fossils at different points in time and something else to explain the change of organisms over time, you would CHANGE the world. If somebody believes in a higher power, they should accept the Theistic Evolution model over Naturalistic Evolution. Pro has failed to address just how creationism is logical enough to explain part of our origins today. I have given examples on why creationism is wrong in one of my previous arguments.Creationism is not a viable model because lots of scientific evidence goes against the idea of Creationism. Evolution is a viable model because it is supported by many pieces of evidence and facts. I rest my case.