The U.S media covers up black on white crime and over reports white or "white" on black crime.

"Millions of people would watch a news story about a baby shot in the face or a man who killed a marine and his pregnant wife. "My point has been further validated. The media focuses on anomalies that can gain ratings. Therefore there is no cover-up. "The Casey Anthony trial was big news and so was the johnbenet Ramsey case. "I pointed this fact in Round 1, not my opponent. "Just search "teens attack Memphis Walmart" it was in September. "I am not doing your research. You brought it up and it is your responsibility to explain the case. Not my responsibility. "I have problems with the leftist and conservative media. The leftist media race baits and appears to be run by people who hate whites and the right wing media spreads Islamophobia and anti gay feelings. I know each news station will only tell stories that fit their agenda. "They are merely muckrakers, it has been an American tradition for a bit longer than a century to say the least. Sensationalism captures the human imagination. "Look up Chris lanes killer racist tweets. There are pictures of his account and the tweets he sent out"Irrelevant to the case. That has as much relevance to that case as Officer Wilson's dispute with his wife's ex life partner. Neither are relevant to their respective cases at all. If you can't prove something is related to the case at hand, then don't bring it up. "You do seem to understand that black on white crime is more common than white on black crime. "It is not an understanding, it is a statistical fact according to the FBI Uniform Crime Index. However, interracial crimes in general is irrelevant because most whites murder other whites and most blacks murder other blacks. Only people with political agendas are searching for these incidents to fit their narratives. "500 of these events are documented in white girl bleed a lot by Colin Flaherty. "The problem with Flaherty's work is that it is sloppy and doesn't even follow the basics of academic research. There is little facts given about those cases. Flahtery just gathered a bunch of Youtube videos and put a political commentary over it to fit his agenda. If we want to talk about cases, you must definitively prove why someone is attacking someone. Again, Flahtery inserted a narrative on these cases. He cannot prove race was related in any of these cases as no one can prove that race was related in the Mike Brown incident. First most people are in overreacting but giving importance to interracial crimes when most whites murder other whites and most blacks murder other blacks. Then to assume, any interracial crime related to race is egregious to say the least. Flahtery did not offer any substantial research on a single case. He offered no empirical data. No one else can go back and actually look at these incidents in details to see how they began, how they were motivated, and how they were ended and come to the same conclusions as Colin Flahtery. Flahtery didn't examine the cases nor did he research the newspapers or media about said cases, he just watched Youtube videos and put a commentary over it. There are no interviews, references, bibliography, or any citations at all. This is unacceptable in a literate society. I want an advanced society and I am tired of the idiots who have plagued this earth too long; they impede progress by offering make believe narratives rather than observing facts and attempting to find facts. A college professor wouldn't accept his pseudo-analytical book. Such books and commentaries by Paul Kersey(Stuff Black People Don't Like) and Colin Flahtery(White Girl Bleed A Lot) shouldn't be dismissed for being "racist" as many simpletons and social justice types wish to do. But they do need to be debunked to show it is not based on empirical research but based on opinion and conjecture. Just as the people who claim police brutality is happening every day need to be debunked. If someone claims a fact, someone else should be able to go back and see what they see without contention. However, these social justice types and their white backlash fellows are not interested in facts or empirical research, only narratives and political agendas. Essentially, profitable lies.