Battlefield 3 is far superior to Call of duty: Modern Warfare 3

When it comes to the "taking it a little too seriously", that was on purpose. In round one you said you wanted this to be funny debate. I was only going along with what you said. Now I suppose I will take it back down a few notches because it seems you would rather prefer an intellectual debate. Maybe I miss understood you, but next time please be more specific as to what a "hilarious" debate means. You asked if I thought that the quick-scopers were more annoying than the BF3 snipers? Well, the thing that you fail to see here, is that to sit perched out of a window and snipe a ton of people is worse than a person in call of duty who is actually running around, and then quick-scoping people. Also, anyone can kill with a BF3 sniper, but quick scoping takes skill. I myself am terrible at it. However some people are persistent, and practice a lot, and they become very good at it. You also say that BF3 has an expansion pack called "close quarters". However......IT'S AN EXPANSION PACK!! This means you have to pay for it, whereas in call of duty, those maps are free. There have been plenty of other expansion packs for MW3 as well, however none of them are required in order to have the non-stop action experience. But let's say you don't like the constant action, and you want to play more tactical, and stealth like. Not only does call of duty have smaller 'close quarters' maps, but it also has long distance maps, as well as maps with lots of spots to hide, regroup, use stealth. Whatever! No expansion packs required! "As for your vehicle argument, vehicles are in the Battlefield game because it is for tactical play not to get across the map, you can use them to get cross map, but that is not really the vehicles soul purpose. Battlefield is played like a tactical game and that does differ from Call of Duty's run and gun formula which most people have come to adore because of the constant action, the vehicles are there for tactical use on the map."You are arguing that the vehicles in BF3 are for tactical purposes. Well, YA everything is for a tactical purpose. I mean the game is based on a war. Also, not only do people use that vehicles to get across the maps a lot faster than everyone else, but vehicles are like a death trap. They are surrounded by CAMPERS! Last round you said the campers were scarce in BF3. However I see them just as much as in Call Of Duty. The 'gun and run' formula is designed to give players the most player to player contact in 1 match. (about 10 min. long) However, like I stated earlier, there are larger maps, that greatly lessen the effects of this formula. Basically Battle Field is a 1 sided game; you either like it or hate it. But MW3 is adaptable to a wide variety of people, and can be played in the fashion that suits you style the best."The vehicles in MW3 are not operable for free use, which is the major difference between the games. The players need to get their AC130, Predator drone, ext. is what keeps them from truly enjoying the game."Notice the word free in your statement above. This of course means than ANYONE can just come up and hop in a vehicle. In BF3, you don't have to do anything to earn it. This means that a 9 year old nube that sucks at the game could go and hop in a tank, and kill a bunch of people. And all the while this kid is yelling into his mic. about how cool he is, and how good he is at this game. But see, that doesn't happen in Call of Duty, because not just anyone can hop into an AC-130, and kill 10 people. Nope, you have earn your stripes in this game. In COD, you get you vehicles by skill, and strategy. And as for campers, they may get 1 or 2 kill streaks, but none of the good ones. People catch on as to were they are pretty quick, they always die. Also, this keeps away those pesky 9 year olds.