Science v. Politics

A" We live in a Capitalist country, meaning all businesses can be privately owned and the politicians and governmental system of America has no power of regulating what factories throw out unless it is a hazardous waste to the environment and to the public. "What is this Pseudo-Intellectual none sense? The Government has literally thousands of regulations regarding production and sale and even consumption. Further, you seem to not appreciate that we are talking about systems fundamentally. Modern governments have a stake in virtually everything. " Politics has nothing to do with this, so your argument about poverty is invalid." What fantasy world do you live in? Politics in terms of Political systems has a lot of to do with poverty, both the issues of poverty and the would be solutions. (ex. Food stamps) I realize libertarians are Anti-Social programs, but really.. pretending that the government doesn't have a social role is just... delusional. " You've stated that I would be wrong to assume the waste of products is not tied to the government, but it isn't. If they did control all factories and how they waste their own product, this country would be more of a communism than an actual Capitalist country. "BYou missed the point, Resource Based Economics ( a system of government that is scientific rather than political) Is an entirely new system." Isn't it Science's job to make advanced technology to increase rate of production and not Politics? You've basically just stated that Science is the reason of excess crops being thrown out by farmers due to unfair prices. "You missed the point again, Science made the Price system obsolete, Political systems passed laws to protect the obsolete price system by destroying crops and animals. The Political system began protecting Capitalist market systems from the advances in technology that made them obsolete."Politicians have no affiliation with the creation of technological advancements, but Science however is the one who is."This statement depended on the other statements to be true and I clearly established they are not, but I didn't want to ignore just because.C" To start off, your whole argument about the Federal Reserve is wrong, it is a private owned business and is not affiliated with the government." Did... you... read.... it? AND I QOUTE " Federal reserve: A private financial institution issuing public money." Did you really not know this? ... Do you not understand the relationship between the Federal Reserve bank(s) and the National Economy, or the relationship between the United states Government and the Federal Reserve. or did you skim my argument and not click the links?" You seem to be forgetting that we live in Capitalist America and not Communist Russia, and with the unfair prices, we don't have an unlimited amount of money. " What are you babbling about? Unlimited amounts of money? Did you forget that we are talking about fundamentally different systems."due to scarcity. "Funny you should mention that : http://lareviewofbooks.org...#You already live in a post scarcity world. How ever our Socio-Political systems pretend for all tense of purposes that we live in the 19th century where the majority of resources where hard to get. Conclusions: Pro spent his main argument making a rebuttal but only even attempted to refute my Criticisms of the current Socio-political situations and its relationships with Economic systems. He provided no meaningful refutes when the "Answers" where given to him and proof of the obsolesce of Political systems was provided. Instead pro chose to ramble, softly accuse me of being communist and than in Comments state that my provided links where-quote-"conspiracies against the government". I propose that Pros ability to argue this issue has collapsed complexly.