Islam is THE main threat to liberty and life and Judeo-Christianity is key to PRESERVING BOTH

I apologize for the delayed response, my father has been in the hospital for the last few days and I have been unable to find time to post an argument. First let me define some terms. Merriam Webster defines the following terms as follows: Threat: An expression of intention to inflict evil, injury, or damage Liberty: The power to do as one pleases, or the positive enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privileges Secondly, I Would like to say that I have looked at all the sites you mentioned and have found them to be nothing more than Islamophobic hate sites. The people who run the sites and commentate on Islam are ill-qualified to be making the statements they are making. All of the websites exhibit a clear conservative political agenda. ProphetOfDoom is run by Craig Winn. Winn graduated from USC with degrees in marketing and finance. He founded the online mall Value America, which went bankrupt in 2000. After 9/11, Winn self-published several anti-Islam books which went largely unnoticed. Winn's books have largely been criticized as "cashing in on fear and ignorance." FaithFreedom is run by self-described "ex-Muslim" Ali Sina, who lives in Canada. The website allows anyone to submit an an anti-Islam article, and provides no biographies or qualifications for Sina or any of its "authors". Sina does provide this interesting quote which clearly goes against your position in this argument: "My criticism applies to all religions. The very concept of God sending messengers to be known and worshipped is absurd. All those who come pretendipg to bring a message from an invisible god that only they can see are charlatans and their claims are bogus. I do believe in a higher Reality and a Single Principle underlying the creation, but not in an egotistic self-centered petulant deity as depicted by these self-appointed prophets." Jihad Watch is run by writer Robert Spencer. Spencer graduated from UNC-Chapel Hill with an M.A. in Early Christianity. Similar to Winn, Spencer has published several books critical of Islam since 9/11. These books have been criticized because they "support preconceived notions through selection bias" and because Spencer has no academic training in Islamic studies whatsoever. Religion of Peace is run by an anonymous person. Once again, it was started in response to 9/11 in order to make people aware of the fact that "there is something deeply, deeply wrong with Islam." If you intend to make some sort of argument from authority, I suggest you find some sources who are more impartial, or at least generally academically recognized. Islam has existed for 1300 years, and yet these attacks which you use as your justification for your argument are a largely modern phenomenon. These websites you use as your information on Islam accentuate the violent verses of the Quran while ignoring the peaceful ones. Similar verses exist in both the New and Old Testaments. Do you really think we can win the War on Terrorism by stopping everyone in the world from practicing Islam? No, the political tensions which fuel modern terrorists would still remain. Muslims are also people who "save lives, help the poor, provide charity" and I hope you will soon realize how dubious your argument really is.