Evil proves God does not exist

He has completely distorted my arguments. He says: 1) God and evil existing are mutually exclusive 2) Evil exists 3) Therefore God does not exist My line of logic is that God created this universe. He has created a universe that can result in evil. If he chooses the capacity of evil, he is choosing evil JUST as creating the capacity of good is creating good. God is infinitely good, so he should not create any course that results in evil. If he creates a course that results in good, he is creating a chain of acts that is good; if he creates a course that results in evil, he is creating a chain of acts that is evil. My opponent states he does both simultaneously by allowing the capacity of both. But an infinitely good God, by nature, could not do both; he would only create a good course. Thus: A -> In order for God to exist, he must be consistent with his nature. B1 -> God's nature is infinitely good. (My opponent ignored this. ) B2 -> An infinitely good agent can only commit good because he is infinitely good. C -> God allows evil to happen. (My opponent concedes this. ) C refutes B1 because B2. If B1 is false, God cannot exist due to A. Next: 1) God and an imperfect world are mutually exclusive 2) An imperfect world exists 3) Therefore God does not exist I never drew "3" from these conclusions. I stated God created a world that causes earthquakes, floods, disease, INDEPENDENT OF OUR FREE WILL TO CHOOSE WHETHER THESE EVENTS WILL HAPPEN. Therefore, the death caused by these events is not of our free will. Death caused by these natural events, therefore, are for no moral reason, and are therefore evil. Thus, God has created a universe that causes death for no compelling moral reason. Therefore, he has committed an evil act by creating a universe with evil results. He cannot be "evil" because he is God, therefore, God does not exist. (I showed this above. ) Just a reminder: My opponent also states that "evil" is not evil if its chosen; then its justice. So God creating a universe that can flood an entire city and kill thousands is "justice"? No. My opponent agrees "pain and death without reason is evil". I have shown God has CHOSEN to create the capacity for the world to kill thousands through natural disasters. Thus God has chosen to allow death without reason to exist. This is God CHOOSING to allow "pain and death without reason. " My opponent tried to disprove point B of my previous Contention 2, but he failed because Con acknowledges that God HAS created a universe that does so. One of the results of this universe is B. B is true. And if B is true, A is true because of C, both points my opponent agreed with. Contention 2 (which I will reword so my opponent is not mistaken on my intentions): A -> God's nature is infinite good. B -> God has created a universe that destroys people's lives and causes pain for no reason. (Again, if it's possible, it has been committed. My opponent states, "God creates a universe/world where evil can exist". Evil has happened through God's allowance. Thus B is self-evident. ) C -> Pain and death without reason is evil. Therefore, God is evil because he has caused "C" through "B". "A" cannot be true. If "A" is not true, God does not exist. (Because God must be consistent with his nature. ) Now: 1) If God existed God would commit action X 2) God has not committed action X 3) Therefore God does not exist Action "X" being the ideal perfect life. Certainly everyone can say how their life can be better. It is assumed that "heaven" is better than life, so that means our current lives are not perfect. If God is all-powerful, he can give us the perfect life without cost. He has not given us the perfect life, without cost. Therefore, he is not all-powerful. So this all-powerful God doesn't exist. OR God purposely chooses not to give us perfect life without cost. My question to my opponent is why would he do this? I simply request an answer. ALSO I agree there are objective morals. There are good acts and evil acts. My opponent asks if God has a moral duty, and I state yes. God, being infinitely good, must be the highest moral agent in existence. Therefore, ANY evil act committed by God compromises his nature. He would not exist. I have shown, more than once above, why allowing evil is evil WHEN you have the power to abolish all evil. The perfect, infinitely good moral agent would abolish evil since his NATURE must oppose evil. God has not; Con agrees he creates the capacity for evil independent of individual choice. Therefore, his act of creating has created a world where all evil acts that occur outside of human choice have been allowed. He is allowing evil. He cannot do this IF he is God. Finally: 1) Objective morals can only exist if God exists 2) Objective morals do exist 3) Therefore God exists I reject this point. I believe God has free will himself. He must, since he has the capacity to choose courses of action. He CHOSE to create the universe. He CHOSE to allow evil. Thus, God has to choose between good or evil. If he must choose good or evil, then morals exist independent of God. As my opponent stated: "Notice I didn't say God creates the evil, God creates the possibility for evil existing. " Therefore, my opponent is hesitant to concede God created evil. This is because if he created evil, he has committed an evil act (I'm sure my opponent knows this). Thus, God would not be consistent with his nature and would not exist. In fact, because Con won't say God creates evil, Con refutes point 1 above because how else would evil exist? It would have to exist independent of God. Thus, his logic fails. Keep in mind also that even when we agree that evil exists independent of God, then my points are proven undoubtedly and God is not consistent with his nature. Thus he does not exist. And with that, I wait for Con.