Evolution by way of natural selection is a fact.

I didn't need to address your 90 degrees claim, because you explained a disaster could have yielded the "impossible bending without breaking unidentified fossilized rock" (you didn't specify which type of rock, like shale, igneous, etc.) You said "there are several layers from different geological era's stacked on top of each other, and ALL OF THEM are bent 90 degrees....fossilized rock cannot be bent without breaking...these examples can, however, be explained by a global disaster." Disasters exist, and if this 90 degrees stuff is actually true, then disaster is a natural explanation for why the rock bent 90 degrees. You just smuggle in the idea that the disaster is from the bible, but I'll let things be and say disasters are a plausible explanation for your 90 degree claim if it's true. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that you don't have any idea what a straw man argument is. Straw man arguments are when you misrepresent your opponents position so that you may poke holes in the misrepresented position you've constructed, like a straw man. I'm the one making the claim so how have I misrepresented your position? You had said "Can you say straw man argument? There is not a single proof for evolution. It's nothing but guess work and speculation." Huh? You then said, "There are no experiments that can be performed, since the events happened in the past." Even when murders happen in the past, we perform experiments on clues we find from the murder scene. So just because events happened in the past doesn't mean we can't perform tests on clues from the past. You say "But there is not one example of a species evolving into another distinct species, or kind of life." Seriously, I would love this. Could you give me a distinct definition of "kind" as you have used it in this context without invoking known scientific classifications of life? Otherwise the word kind has no biological application. You also said "Evolutionists claim that these minor changes can result in new species. There is no proof that this has ever happened." Ok, you're referring to something called speciation. This is also a demonstrated fact, has happened, has been observed, and confirms the predictions of evolution. But first... You say "There is also the fact that there are different definitions of species." Not really. The wording of the definitions may differ, but a species is a reproductive community that can reproduce viable offspring that are compatible to reproduce viable offspring with the reproductive community (species). You may find thousands of ways to say it, but the definition includes these ideas of reproductive viability. So a change in species would occur if enough members of one reproductive community were generating offspring or becoming themselves no longer compatible with the rest of the reproductive community. These reproductive outcasts can start their own reproductive community or species. So to demonstrate speciation we can take an insect species that eats sugar cane only. Well the females of this species have eggs that can only be penetrated by sperm with certain chemicals on the head of the sperm, and the chemicals on the head of the sperm are dictated by the sugar they eat. So let's imagine that half of this species migrates way far away from sugar cane, to a place where there is only oak tree leaves, and the other half stays with the sugar cane. Now let's imagine 10 generations pass for each half of the species. Due to the oak tree leaves affect on the chemicals on the sperm, the eggs of the sugar cane insects won't accept the sperm of the oak tree leaf insect. They are no longer members of the same reproductive community, thus are a new species. But the best part is that we don't need to imagine this. This has actually happened with fruit flies, has been observed, and speciation is exactly what you'd expect if evolution were true. So speciation is another fact of evolution, and so is natural selection. Natural selection simply means that organisms that lived long enough to reproduce had characteristics that let them live long enough to reproduce. Typically the organism without these characteristics won't live long enough to reproduce, so their traits do not pass on. Traits that allow the organism to live long enough to reproduce have been selected, naturally, by the demands/dangers/resources of the environment of the organism. Evolution is a substantiated fact.