Donald Trump's "Muslim Ban" is unconstitutional.

My opponent (CON) continuously brings up the fact that the place in which immigrants are coming from are horrible and "terror plagued"Every point CON has made has been in regards to what is happneing outside of the United States. By making these statements it is further proving my point that immigrants, refugees specifically should not be banned from enter the United States. Seeing as though they are fleeing the countries in which the terrorists live. Now, onto how this executive order, by Donald Trump is considered unconstitutional:a) This ban violates the 14th amendment Equal Protection Clause (EPC), and it also constitutes an "establishment" of religion. Due to this, it also violates the first amendment. It doesn't matter whether or not Muslims are citizens, noncitizens, green card holders, refugees or visa holders. The EPC strictly prohibits, "deny[ing] to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”b) no act by a government official—no matter to whom it applies—can be based on disapproval of a race, ethnicity or religion. This statement can be simplified as follows:- The motive of the government and its agents is what matters most. Donald has already proven that he feels anger towards Muslims when he called for a "complete shutdown" of Muslims coming into our country. This almost got him kicked off of the campaign trail. c) CON stated, "First, I would like to point out that Trump's Executive Order is not a Muslim Ban. It is a ban on nationals of the countries. The seven countries that are Muslim majority were chosen by President Obama believing that they were of particular concern."This argument is weak to say the least. Just because an order violates some people of a race, religion, ethnicity, gender, age group etc. Does not make the violation legal. It would not matter if Donald discriminated against all 1.6 billion Muslims or just one, that does not change the fact that it is unconstitutional. d) Trump's executive order states the following (this is in regards to what the Secretary of State should do.): “prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality.” This directly violates the Establishment Clause of the first amendment. Because his order is specificall targeting Muslim majority countries. This clause states that, “government should not prefer one religion to another, or religion to irreligion.” Not mention the fact that the day Donald signed this order he taped an interview with David Brody in which he was asked, "the refugee changes you’re looking to make, as it relates to persecuted Christians, do you see them as kind of a priority here?” Donald responded "Yes," then continuing to suggest that Syrian Christians should receive special treatment. This again is evidence that proves Donald Trump is violating the Establishment Clause which prohibits the favoritism Trump he is showing.e) Honestly, does CON believe that innocent citizens of these seven countries are trying to flee to come and kill us all? CON continues to mention how open our borders are, but the vetting process to get into the States is already extreme. No one has ever suggested that we let anyone come in. The United States should be careful as to who they're letting in and we were doing this prior to the Muslim Ban put into place by Donald. This Muslim ban would not have stopped: 9/11 or the Pulse Shooting. This ban does nothing but encourage people to join ISIS and their radical thought process. [1][1]: http://www.politico.com...;