best method to prevent the racial and cultural extinction of the white ethnic groups

Thanks, Pro, for the response. 1. Pro begins by noting that Chinese and Japanese people are not "facing a future where mass immigration will eventually turn them into minorities in China and Japan." While that may be true, how is it relevant to my argument? My point was to show that white Americans/Europeans were not the only ones to see a decline in their fertility rates. As I said in the last round, we can assume that this is not just a white cultural phenomena but rather one that affects many groups - and not just because of Christianity and paganism. This disproves the theory that Christianity is relevant to the population decline of whites, and also shows how if other populations are decreasing, that white people aren't in danger of going extinct; instead all cultural groups are on the decline together. 2. Next Pro talks about population control / reduction. Pro - where was this a factor in the last round? I don't remember mentioning it. My second point, in fact, was about the book "Demographic Winter" and how it explained various cultural trends including a smaller household (women having less children and why). Pro has ignored this point and all of my other points in favor of talking about the population in America and Britain being swarmed by non-whites. Once again, non-whites entering Europe and America does not indicate the eradication of the white race. Further, Pro has still yet to explain why that would be a bad thing anyway (if it was not forced or antagonized through something horrible like genocide). People should be free to procreate with whomever they want regardless of their race. Anyway, I'd like to extend my arguments about all of the monetary and socio-demographical reasons women have been having less children. Once again, neither Christianity nor feminism is really relevant. 3. Pro continues talking about how politicians want white people to disappear: a claim I feel has no backing whatsoever. The article Pro sites mentions a mass migration surge to Britain; a change politicians welcomed to enrich London's culture, and create a bigger labor market to help England's economy. Indeed the article he sites concludes with, "The British people can be confident that immigration is under control." Nevertheless this 'point' faces the same problem as Pro's others -- It does not mention anything about white people dying off. Becoming a minority is not dying off, therefore Pro's dramatic question of whether or not it's justified is not relevant. Pro says English people are "scared of being English because it's racist" though this is not true -- Pro again straw mans the article. The article was about English FLAGS; not being English in general. Regardless, being English has nothing to do with race anyway! You can be English and white or English and black, etc. 4. Pro just rants. He doesn't prove that WHITE people are being demonized, etc. He has not proven that Christianity and the population of white people is related in any way whatsoever. He's ignored all of my arguments and hasn't proven that paganism in any way will preserve white people. All he says is that paganism encourages people to "fight back" though this type of defense is promoted in the Bible, Torah, Qu'ran and other holy books too. He seemingly concedes the point about utilitarianism and doesn't even mention feminism at all in the last round. This is probably because feminism like Christianity doesn't have much to do with the eradication of white people. As I've been saying, many feminists support the traditional household model Pro calls for, as can be seen by this feminist website called Feminist Housewives [1]. In short, Pro has ignored many of my arguments and hasn't really strengthened his. Please extend all of my points. Thank you. [1] http://feministhousewives.ning.com...