Sun rotation causes the Earth's rotation | the Sun and Earth revolve each other.

Con, I'm being honest with you, you've ignored the key points of my second round argument; and these key points contradict many of your points of your second round argument. You have beaten around the bush, in effort to make a sculpture that fits in your garden but not mine, or ours. From now on I hope you'll give a second thought to my words, and take in some of what's being said. In the case of Quad Helix theory, I'm your teacher. You should begin by accepting my teaching so that Quad Helix theory makes sense to you, and so that you can form a viable argument against it. I also advise you to argue against the entire semantics and not dissect the text into bite-size parts, because that would abstract what's expressed. Right now, discussing with you is impossible as you're lost in your love for the academic body of knowledge. Your arguments are references to other people, references to theories and other references. Where is your part in this argument? You're no scientist so why did you accept this debate? To round three then... 'If what you claim can't be proved, then it is insignificant to talk about it.' Con, I specifically claimed that I proved Quad Helix theory by wise sense, and said that I couldn't prove 'a wise sense'; implying that if you were wise, with your senses you could prove Quad Helix theory. The total Sol [referral; round 1 definition of Sol] power in the universe causes planets to be spherical. The Sun in the centre of our galaxy stabilizes Earth's rotation; had the Sun not been there, Earth's mass wouldn't hold, and in frictionless space it would become void. The Sun is the force which causes the “day rotation of Earth” effect. The anti rotation which you speak about is only logical moments after Earth's genesis, where it's rotation was chaotic, not in harmony with a Sun, but rather primal Sol power. 'Not everything has that power of four...' You're completely wrong, everything is a fraction of the transcendent Quad Helix, and a power of the transcendent Quad Helix. It most definitely accounts for spirals, for they can be divided by four quarters or quadrants. It also accounts for proportions of the body, for we have symmetrical sides, front facing senses and more attributes that are a fraction of four. The Quad Helix theory describes intricately the proportions of a human but I haven't mentioned it in this argument; I'm sure you won't understand, so let's focus on what I have mentioned. 'Back to school fact: the Sun does not revolve the Earth.' Your school was wrong, your teachers were wrong, and you're wrong; the only thing schools and teachers are producing in the modern era is a barren Earth. 'As many philosophers have stated, we think in words...' We do not only think in words, there are many types of thought; types of thought that are diminished by words, wisdom that is neglected by words, and many more maleficent side-effects of thinking in words. We can't think opposite, and you can barely think opposite to what you were taught in school; that's the main brain-damage of words. Again, these philosophers, like your teachers in school, were wrong, most of those who found success in support of thinking in words were unintelligent. 'Interesting how to prove Quad Helix, he uses Quad Helix as a premise...' I had proven Quad Helix to myself prior to communicating it with anybody. Quad Helix wisdom is necessary for education to be beneficent, without it we only harm ourselves. We are all in the image of Quad Helix, so I guess that's why it seems like circular thinking- in fact, circular would be a good metaphor for image dei. 'This example has nothing to do with what you say...' Yes it does, it shows that things can be proven through wise sense, and not only communication. The difficulty is proving to the unwise what a wise sense is, that's why we're stuck in this stalemate. I hope you agreed to what I said at the start of this third round argument, and take in the whole semantics before coming up with contradictions and listen to the teachings of that which you do not understand. Con, will not change; Con, is an academic slave like most of the world. The slavers are leading us to a fool's death, and the academic slaves are laughing and engaging in perversity, even when prompted with the fact that our children will inherit an inhabitable Earth. There's not much I can do to save Con's mind, it's pretty much set in stone, but I'm sure I'm of a higher intelligence called Quad Helix, an intelligence greater than any academic long-transcript of knowledge.