Gravity Does Not Exist

That was good. Alright I shall now do my best to debunk what Pro has stated. Firstly, In relation to light, it is incorrect to say it does not have mass. Now it is also wrong to say it does. Light under certain circumstances does appear to have an actual mass, like when put inside a box filled with mirrors. However when it is alone we have yet to find mass for it. There are many things to debate that Light does indeed have mass such as the formula E = mc^2 Energy equals mass times the speed of light to the power of two. So by saying this, and knowing Light has energy, Mass must be something above 0. Mathematically speaking. Of course this isn't the nail in the coffin to say Light does have mass. They call it relativistic mass. Or Nonzero mass. Secondly, Buoyancy has to do with the density of things, not about how much of the object there is. Now Light may or may not have mass, but it does have energy density. Going by my Buoyancy theory, Light should bend and move according to the energy that it passes through. Which is exactly the case! This is how mirages work, Light bends and refracts due to the hot air being more dispersed while is bends even more so with cold air which is much more dense. By definition Refraction is the bending of light through different mediums of density. This is why in space Light still bends, not because of gravitational pulls! Thirdly, This is where Optical Density comes in. Optical Density is what I understand as, how tight the atoms are together and how they can maintain and control the energy passing through them. Like in a solid the atoms are close together and are vibrating, Optical Density is how much room and ability do they have to vibrate. This can be tested with any object you so desire, just shine some light on the situation ;) This shows what is the true force of bending light. Fourthly, Let us go directly into Space! The Optical Density of a vacuum is 1.000000. Yes it indeed has optical density. This is why Light can bend in an absolute vacuum such as space! We also know that frequencies and energy is present in the vacuum of Space, we use these frequencies to study the Big Bang and such. Where there is energy there will be energy density! This is how Buoyancy remains true even in Outer Space. The layering of densities. Fifthly , To go further in depth with how Space moves and pushes objects. As we have seen Space the vacuum does indeed have a form of density. Combine this with the fact that Space is often theorized to be Physical. Hence the term Physical Space. Space is also theorized to be a key factor in the making of our dimension. So since Space does indeed have a density, it would be affected by the effects of buoyancy! So I shall describe what I have said in what I hope is more clear. When a object moves, whether in space or not, The object takes the position of the "Area" that was once there. That Area then is pushed around the object taking the previous position of the object. This is how things move and are affected by movement. This can be demonstrated with water. Move your hand while underwater and the water will go behind your hand taking the place your hand once was also creating a current, just like how we see the movement of things pulls others. Sixth, You perfectly prove my point when you come to Black Holes. They are infinitely DENSE! As you said, it poses a problem with Gravity but you it actually does not pose a problem with Buoyancy! The Black Hole which is infinitely Dense automatically attempts to go below everything less dense that it. This two things, One the Black Hole forming into extreme density leaves the surrounding area extremely lacking in density, this causes all things less dense then the area to charge towards the black hole. The black hole is also extremely dense hence trying to go beneath everything sucked towards ti. This is where Gravity and Buoyancy agree, but buoyancy then explains why objects are sucked in and destroyed. You see since there is a Low Density on the outside of the Black Hole everything will go toward the Black Hole, but since the Black hole is much more Dense than the objects, It will attempt to go underneath them. Be crushed by the absolute Density and Absolute lack of density from both sides would destroy the objects. This is one way Buoyancy can explain the Black Hole phenomena that Gravity cannot. How do Black Holes form if not for Gravity. Well density is the answer. Just like a Primordial Black Hole which is the size of an atom but with the density of a Mountain. Buoyancy explains why this sucks everything in and destroys things. The Idea for Gravity is a mistaken form of Buoyancy, Gravity is an incomplete force, the Full version is Buoyancy. Every time it talks about something have more Gravity it talks about the density of the object, well the same logic applies to Buoyancy, however we can test Buoyancy and prove it everyday. Seventh, Your pen and hair have an attraction that just isnt noticeable? However no matter how small the attraction is, we should be able to find a slight change in gravitational pull. Like when I drop my pencil a centimeter away from a wall. The Wall should pull the pencil ever so slightly, even if it isnt visible to the eye, however when tested, the pencil will fall the same way no matter where it is dropped. Eighth, Some air does fall up. However if Gravity was the reason why air stayed on Earth, but it gets weak fast (your own words) and even weaker the farther you are then how come it effects Air in the atmosphere the same way it does down here? Should we not see a distinct difference in gravitational pull? Or how about when I jump, there should be an extremely small change in my weight and the pull that Earth has on me. But the way I see it, the farther things are the Earth seems to be pulling stronger? This would be inconsistent with Gravity, because of how hard the Earth pulls the Moon is so much stronger than the amount pulled on us. (Remember the Moon is 30 some Earth Diameters away! Earth is 4 times bigger than the Moon. So that is 120 moons away!) Going by this logic I should be able to efficiently pull something 120 sizes of me away with considerable force. As everything Math can scale down, If there was something 4 times bigger than me 120(Units of me) times far from me I should still be able to pull it. Because the Moon does the same and manages to pull our entire oceans!!! (70% of the Earth!) That is pulling more than itself! However with Buoyancy this is all solved! As the Moon comes closer the density of space lessens, this causes everything on Earth to edge towards the lesser dense area creating the bulge of the Earth and High Tides and Low Tides. Ninth, Remember I am going under the assumption Gravity does not exist, hence I will show you ways Buoyancy works without Gravity. We all know that buoyancy would still exist without Gravity. However if Buoyancy was pushing up stronger than the push down of Gravity the data would still be obscured as the Buoyancy factor would be adding to the mass of the object, Just like Light in a box. However if there was no Gravity, and you had Buoyancy pushing down and Buoyancy pushing up, one would not be stronger than the other, leaving you with a perfect cancel out and giving us the true mass of an object. If Gravity did exist than we would have to find the mass of an object in water and then subtract the buoyancy affect. But that is not what we do. As for the Milk and Water, yes their buoyancy is greatly similar, but you have to add in the force of pouring the water into the glass, the water being pushed down due to being heavier than air. The water will also take some air with it, causing the glass of milk and water to be a glass of milk, water and air. The Air automatically rises to the top due to buoyancy, The water is pushed down by the air until the air rises out of the glass so the water can finally rise. Not because of any gravitational force. As you said Buoyancy would be stronger than Gravity (if it existed) then that is without a doubt proof that buoyancy would effect the true mass of objects by pushing upwards against it. In order to find the variable you must due the same to both sides. And by trying to find the x-intercept of this we would have to set it to equal zero. Example: Lets say the forces equal 5 for the sake of it. X + 5 = 5, We must find the true mass of X, it is being pushed on by forces that equal five. So we must subtract 5 from both sides, An equal amount of force must be taken from both sides. However if Gravity is weaker then Buoyancy then you would not get the objects true mass. You would have X + 5 = 4 which would mean X = -1. Doesnt work. This is why it requires the same force to push down as it does to push up. For balanced math. 10th, I already spoken of what Weight can really be in Buoyancy and not gravity. It is the force that is applied to an object based on its density to move into a new layer. Also I dont think its silly to debate this, its fun! Plus I am not lying about my information. I may not have physics courses but I do have a mind that can research. Sources: http://www.universetoday.com... http://www.district196.org... http://www.physicsclassroom.com... http://www.nasa.gov... https://en.wikipedia.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.desy.de... 4 of these I know are 100% known as credible, like NASA, Physicsclassroom, Universetoday is a journalist site, all credible. Of course the Wiki's could be iffy, sine they are indeed Wiki but I only used them for definitions.