Being Fat isn't Always Directly Linked to Being Unhealthy. You Can be FIT AND FAT at The Same Time.

Introduction So I've got to argue that every fatty is unhealthy? Whatever. How fat is fat? Visually, sickeningly chubs to the point of near demise? Or just your dad fat? I could argue that they would be more healthy if they lost some damn weight, so while they might not be unhealthy, they're not exactly at their most healthy due to being fat. Being fat is like a ticking time bomb, you're all chubby and smiley one minute then BAM! you got a fat heart attack and you're dead! You might think you're healthy, but for how long? How long until your stubby little legs give way to your disproportionately excessive amounts of cultivated mass? You think you're healthy, but you're on a downwards decent to death through a fat endued bed bound fate. Enjoy life while you're only moderately fat. They don't sell size XXXL shirts in every store for a reason, because fatties die before reaching that size. To be considered fit you'd have to be of a suitable quality, standard, or type to meet the required purpose. Meaning a fat person might be fit enough to eat 20 hot dogs, but NOT run a 10 mile marathon. A fatty might even be fit enough to consume the half eaten cheese burgers out of a public bin WITHOUT getting ill, but NOT get out of bed in the morning. Clearly there are circumstances where fatties are fitter than your average man, however I'm assuming my opponent means physical fitness and so I will argue that fatties are not healthy when it comes to physical activity and in fact are at a disadvantage due to their weight and size. Indicating lack of healthy. Fatties and physical exertion In what circumstance can a fatty be considered an athlete? -Sumo wrestling. -Power lifting. Both of which have been proven to have short life expectancies, possibly due to being fat, they also use short bursts of energy before the "athlete" is required to rest, recover and eat - https://www.google.co.uk... While fatties can be considered "athletes" in some rare, non-cardio vascular cases, can they be considered physically healthy? It's clear that fat people have trouble running for sustained amounts of time, mainly due to carrying more mass, more blood needing to circulate, additional pressure on the arteries and fat acting as an insulator which raises the temperature of the fatty. In this case fatties are at a physical disadvantage when it comes to exercise, due to being fat. This also tells us they're not fit enough to perform the task of prolonged running and therefore I have proven that fat people are not fit due to being fat in at least one instance. (I only need one instance right?) I believe I have sufficiently disproven my opponents claim that "You Can be FIT AND FAT at The Same Time." How many fat wild apes do you see? I have never seen a single fat wild chimp, nor a fat wild lion (even the lazy males) This is simply because fat does not provide a survival advantage to any of these animals including us humans. Only whales have blubber which does provide a survival advantage. Imagine if a female lion was overwhelmingly fat, could she hunt? Well she managed to get fat in the first place, so maybe she can, right? WRONG the female lion can't hunt because she could never catch prey, so I would argue she stole that food! Perhaps from other lions, she was leeching from her fellow lions. This is not unlike the fat people of today, too many fat people is UNHEALTHY for society. Nobody cares about the health of fat people, it's the health of society that we care about and due to the strains these fatties place on our society I reject my opponents statement which is "Being Fat isn't Always Directly Linked to Being Unhealthy." Being fat is detrimental to society. To conclude my opening arguments. I have contested my opponents claims, being- -Being Fat isn't Always Directly Linked to Being Unhealthy. -You Can be FIT AND FAT at The Same Time.