Dir en Grey is the most versatile and great band of all time.

I negate the resolution "Dir en Grey is the most versatile and great band of all time." Perhaps most obvious about this resolution is the fact that it is entirely subjective; not everyone will agree on what the greatest band is. However, more important than the opinionated resolution is the fact that my opponent has made little to no sufficient arguments in defense of his belief. To support the resolution, Pro makes several claims. First, he mentions that DEG transcends genre and thus "redefines versatility." While this might be true, consider the fact that it is almost impossible for a band to be pigeonholed into just one genre. Most bands can be classified by at LEAST two genres. For instance, an alternative rock band fits under the description of both "rock" and "alternative rock." Similarly, DEG is described as being a rock band or a rock metal band. While there are certainly all different kinds of ROCK, a band like The Rolling Stones, for example, is famous for their songs that fall into the categories of rock, classic rock, country, blues, ballads, disco, jazz, big band, electronic, etc. This plethora of genres (and there are more) far exceeds the categories of music DEG can be described as playing. Therefore, if there are other bands that can be considered to fall into more categories or genres than DEG, then DEG fails to be recognized as the most versatile band according to this qualification. Next, Pro notes that DEG's singer has a wide range of vocals. I'd like to note singer Robert Palmer, who throughout his career has been known to sing songs of a multitude of genres, including rock, r&b, rhythm & blues, soul, jazz, swing, reggae, ska, etc -- an accomplishment that DEG's singer has not (yet) accomplished. Moreover, there are other known singers (some whom are household names, and some who are not not) whose actual vocal range is far greater than the singer of DEGs. Consider artists who have the ability to span their vocals over an 8 octave range in terms of high and low notes, keys, etc. However, this point is almost entirely irrelevant; a singer's vocal range is hardly indicative of a band's versatility or greatness, therefore Pro's point should not be taken into consideration. What if a band had a great singer, but horrible musicians? The singer is not the only artist to be taken into consideration given the resolution of this debate. Finally, Pro cites DEGs lyrical content as what helps make them "the best." Obviously, this point is moot. Who is to be the judge for what "good" lyrics are? In addition to being entirely subjective, there are many people who prefer music without lyrics, to which this point would be taken into zero consideration when determining which band is the best. Moreover, not everyone wants their music to talk about "important" matters. Many people use music as a means to escape the drama of their every day lives; not dwell in it. In conclusion, I must reiterate the notion that what band is to be considered the best is highly subjective. Therefore, it is my opponent's burden to prove via valid contentions why DEG is suited for that title. I have effectively argued against all of Pro's arguments. I can also effectively argue the resolution by naming another band which I consider to be of greater versatility and accomplishment, therefore making them "the greatest." If I can prove that said band is 'better' via my own contentions, I will win this debate. To demonstrate my position, I will choose The Beatles to oppose DEG as being the most versatile and greatest band. Some reasoning for my position includes: 1. The Beatles are the best selling musical act of all time. While popularity may not be indicative of talent, the fact that they are the most popular band that has ever existed (they sold over 40 billion albums worldwide) certainly demonstrates the band's appeal as opposed to DEG, which many people have not even heard of. 2. The Beatles released 40+ number one singles, EPs and albums in the UK. DEG has failed to achieve such prestige. 3. The "experts" of music magazines such as Rolling Stone have listed The Beatles as being the greatest band of all time. This consensus was reached via contentions such as my own, and surveys of opinions of many music connoisseurs. 4. While DEG may transcend language barriers in some instances, The Beatles sparked an entire cultural revolution, influencing not only music but other forms of art, politics and philosophy worldwide. 5. The Beatles dabbled in all kinds of music genres, even creating some new ones of their own. They also were the first popular act to use exotic instruments in their songs and experiment with different sounds and tones. It is undeniable how much their sound had progressed from their inception until Lennon's death. For instance, they later on used classical musicians on their pop albums (which was unpopular, and obviously a testament to their versatility), music sampling, and played around with various tones from guitar feedback, just to name a few examples. 6. The Beatles also redefined the music industry in general; they changed the entire way (technologically) music was recorded. "We were always pushing ahead: Louder, further, longer, more, different." -- Paul McCartney Thus, I believe The Beatles to be a more versatile and far greater band than Dir en Grey. I stand in firm negation of the resolution both based on my opponent's lack of valid contentions in support of DEG, and the fact that I believe The Beatles to trump DEG in all aspects of my opponent's values as well as some of my own. Back to ye, Kefka.