Report Topic Do you believe the Boston Marathon bombing suspects ACTUALLY DID IT "No Evidence"!

"Well since they made sure to shoot him in his throught, disable his tongue, have someone write for him " I still don't get how someone would read someone else's mind and write down the information?!!" " Who's "he" ? Can you please be more clear. I understand form context you talk about Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, but please be more precise . Anyway. Yes, Dzhokhar apparently suffered injuries in the throat or neck. But he's perfectly capable of communicating. He talks, e.g. he responded "No" when asked a question during its hearing, and probably mostly communicates via writing. His lawyers are there to ensure that everything is done according to the rule of the law. And if it weren't done through the rule of the law, then the trial would be finished in no time, and he would be free. "and Miranda rights wasn't read for him either..." He was read his Miranda rights during the hearing. He wasn't at first, because they needed to know if he had any urgent plans or hidden explosives somewhere ready to blow up. Even if he isn't read his miranda rights, he still has them and has every right to stay silent. Anyway, the fact that he wasn't read his rights is actually in his favor, because everything he said before that point cannot be used against him in the future trial. "then this thing stinks big time! what's gonna happen is they will get a corrupted judge and show him the irrelevant pictures as evidence and they will get a plea deal out of the poor kid in order for him to avoid the death penalty." Please present evidence of that, because it's just speculation on your part. "I just feel sorry for all of those families who lost their loved ones for some missed up government plan to make us feel that we need more security, it's like they trying to say: hey Americans, don't ever think if Binladen is dead that you are safe!". We'll have more incidents like this one over and over again to keep us busy and feeling insecure." Then you have to agree that if it's a plan, it's a shitty plan. Look at now, a few weeks after the bombing, nothing has changed in the status quo. People's attention is shifted to other news, nobody is going to change anything. We'll have incidents like this, sure, because there are bad people that do bad things all the time. If you want to argue that every single shooting or bombing is a government conspiracy, you have to explain why it's absolutely impossible for shootings or bombings to occur without a government conspiracy involvement. "If you want me to believe that these guys actually did it then I would like to see all of the FBI being investigated for not doing their and job of protecting us and having ZERO intelligent information regarding this indecent." It's an hindsight bias fallacy. You know, now, that these guys were dangerous. And you want to blame someone. What about you blame the bombers ? They did the thing. Failure to predict hard to predict events shouldn't be prosecutable. Otherwise, be ready for a shitstorm. Any accident you have, you will have to respond to it criminally, and investigated why you didn't do this or that that might maybe have prevented it. Let's say your brakes break while driving, and you accidentaly kill a kid who was there on the driveway. NOBODY would prosecute you for it if it's truly an accident. Even if you could have done something to save that kid (maybe, if you changed your brakes the week before, you'd have save him. Maybe, you should have turned left at the previous intersection, maybe, maybe...). The FBI is composed of people trying to do the best they can with the resources they have. The only way to have perfect intelligence and avert any possible bombing scenario would be to have every single fbi agent following every single person on this planet, i.e. a police state. And even that wouldn't be perfect. So you can't have it both way, loathe a police state that "they" want to implement by putting fear by faking bombing incidents, and blaming that state when it doesn't implement the police stat that YOU demand in order to have been able to avert every bombing incident. "And again how come the K9's weren't able to detect bombs material?!!" The K9 isn't perfect either. The tsarnaevs went, put the bombs, in and out, fast and quick. K9 is not a perfect "smell a bomb from 10 miles", it's done in the off chance that the K9 would be close to the bomb material before it detonates. "actually did a search and found that there are certain materials that have the ability to disable dog's sense of smell,,so here we go again!!!" So what ? There are plenty of things that exist to make anything deadlier and/or more difficult to detect. It's not an argument. We don't stop trying to arrest burglars because 95% of them get away with it. (it's a pulled-out-of-my-butt stat) We try our best, and we perfect the countermeasures the best we can. The other option, giving up, is not preferable. "NON of the evidence adds up" You haven't really looked at it a lot. - The Tsarnaevs brothers seen on camera at the marathon, with the backpacks containing the bombs, seen on camera putting them on the floor where bombs detonated, then seen fleeing the scene like nothing happened. Them admitting openly to having done it. "and this bombing just got more Americans thinking more seriously about how missed up our government is and how it would go in order to protect its own agenda. Sorry again to all of our victims and my heart goes out to all of you." The Boston bombing don't indicate there is an hidden agenda in the government. That is just speculation on your part. You have to provide evidence of that, and your intervention provides none.