The Elo System Should be Changed in DDO

DDO is mainly about Debating skills. Other than the games in the forums and chatting with your friends, the crucial point in DDO is to get better and better at debating, by challenging other people. [SITUATION ONE] But, what if you want to challenge a good debater? What if you meet some guy with over 3,500 elo, only to find out he or she is an easy-to-beat-noob- sniper? That wouldn't be a good challenge. If you meet some dude with a big elo yet not-so-good debating skills, you definitely want the elo system to change to a somehow more accurate calculation, so that you know whether they're good or not just by looking at their elo rather than having to decide through reading their debates. [SITUATION TWO] On the other hand, lowly elo people might get ignored; you look at a guy with only 2222 elo, and you skip over him because he doesn't "look" intimidating, while in reality he might be amazing debater who just happens to have only 10 debates that don't boost his elo much. It's sad that way, and good debaters are smushed down with a bad elo. Therefore....The elo system must be changed if I prove either, or both of these situations to be true. (And with the proving of these two situations, my BoP is fulfilled)1. It doesn't stop noob-snipers.Noob-snipers still gain a ton of elo. Two good examples are Teemo and jh1234l. Teemo has a massive over-4,000 elo, [1] while jh1234l has more than 3,000 elo. [2] However, they both lost to me, a mere ~2100 elo debater. [3] This just shows how much of a noob-sniper both of them are, and the fact is that noob-snipers can't be stopped, they still gain a load of elo regardless of the point reduction of the contender.2. It does not accurately display your debating skills.One good example is the under-rated debater Envisage. He's amazing!! He doesn't even have 2,500 elo [4], but he defeated a guy with over 4,500 elo [5], won against some person with almost 3,200 elo [6], and defeated some guy with over 3,400 elo [7]. This just shows how unfair the elo system is. As pointed out above when a good experienced guy defeats a noob they gain loads of elo, while Envisage, even with the instigator advantage, cannot gain a lot of elo from defeating all these uber-impressive dudes.Another good example of an under-rated debater is YYW. That's right--although he has more than 3,900 elo [8], he is actually still under-rated. Similarly to Envisage, he defeated that same guy with over 4,500 elo [9]. He also defeated his love, bsh1, who has over 5,500 elo [10]. He even defeated the powerful moderator-debater, Ore Ele, who has more than 5,800 elo. [11] That's not even his most impressive feat--he crushed Danielle in a debate, and Danielle has over 7000 elo!! [12] This just demonstrates how under-rated YYW is. Thus, I have shown:-Some debaters with big elo but not-quite-so-good debating skills-Some debaters with rather low-elo but amazing skills-My BoP and how I fulfilled itOnto you, con.[1] debate.org/teemo[2] debate.org/jh1234l[3] debate.org/9spaceking[4] debate.org/envisage[5] http://www.debate.org...[6] http://www.debate.org...[7] http://www.debate.org...[8] debate.org/yyw[9] http://www.debate.org...[10] http://www.debate.org...[11] http://www.debate.org...[12] http://www.debate.org...