Murder is okay under all circumstances

Though Con only has to prove an instance when murder is not okay, he has chosen to use some examples which in my opinion do not form part of the topic, they are when a murderer completely destroys or hides a body. I think Con may be trying to connect murder with actions which are not okay. Mutilation and murder are two separate things, like rape and murder should also be treated as two different things. When people allow their feelings to dictate their beliefs they often think if murder is okay then someone can rape a man or woman and get away with it, and wrongly conclude that murder is not okay for that reason. The truth is if it is okay to murder someone it doesn't make it okay to rape someone and vice versa. The two are not the same thing. Yes, a baby might not survive if it were raped, and some people might believe such rapists are murderers but there is no reason to think they raped a baby with the intent of killing it. If someone does use murder to get away with something, it doesn't make murder wrong, the actions they are trying to get away with doing is probably wrong. Running away from problems or punishment is merely natural. Hiding a dead body of a person you've murdered is natural because murder is illegal i.e. punishable, so if murder were legal then people wouldn't go to such effort to hide a dead body, I think they would tell the right people so that the organs can be harvested and save lives. I have proven that murder saves more lives and thus makes more people happier. There is no greater gift than life so why wouldn't murder be okay? It doesn't matter if innocent people, scientists, McDonald employees or if prisoners are murdered, all lives are equally valuable, but the lives of the many outweigh the lives of the few. When someone agrees to donate their organs upon death they accept it is okay for their body to be mutilated too, most people including religious leaders agree with organ donation. Mutilating a living person is wrong though, however murder takes place the very moment someone dies and it is not necessary for someone to have all their organs etc destroyed in order to die, as life is fragile. Con doesn't provide an example whereby someone could die by mutilation. So lets suppose someone traps someone in a car, and presses a button to crush that car into a cube, which makes their body completely unusable. Is murder okay in that instance? Well, is it okay for rabbits to kill their babies? Is it okay for cats to kill mice or birds and leave them to rot? The answer is yes, because it is natural, they are following instincts and organisms can feed from the dead body. There are people who also believe that it is okay because those animals aren't intelligent, i.e. if you have intelligence then you should use it, and thus it isn't okay to not use your brain. However this logic is flawed. The intelligence of humans ranges a lot, and there are many people with mental illnesses. I would say that if someone did go to any length to kill someone by destroying their entire body they are either stupid or not well. Whose fault is that? Maybe the people who make crazy laws. I will waiver the third round as agreed so we have an equal number of rounds to make arguements. I'd appreciate it if my points are countered. Many thanks for challenging me