Theism

IntroductionThough I would usually begin a debate by thanking my opponent, there is not much to thank him for right now. He has broken many rules. First, he provided his rebuttals in round 2, when I, in round 1, clearly stated that "Round 2 will be for main arguments only." Second, his grammar was dreadful, which is in violation of my rule: "proper spelling and grammar should be utilized at all times."According to the standard, universal code of debate, violating the rules fabricated by the instigator of a debate results in a loss. Perhaps my opponent can redeem himself in this round.RebuttalsNow that it is round 3, it is time for rebuttals. My opponent's arguments consisted of opinions and unsubstantiated statements. They will be tremendously easy to refute.My opponent began by listing the four basic points I made and trying to refute them. When refuting them, he gave opinions, not facts of evidence. "Beg to differ" is not an argument."1. Who is my opponent to assert what is accutally possible when there "YOU ARE........" DUH? How did you get here? The Big Bang??????"I can assert what is possible because I have rights. I don't really know what my opponent is asking here. I assert what is possible by using facts, data, and evidence. Looking further into my opponent's arguments, he is asserting what he thinks to be possible by looking at the back of the US Dollar."2. Was my opponent there when the universe was created? NO!!!!!!! He only offered personal opinion." I was not there when the universe was created. Therefore, I do not know with 100% certainty what occurred then. However, my opponent doesn't either. He says a god created it, but offers no proof. I say there was a big bang, but I offer proof and viable theories."3. My opponent has never ever read the back of a USA dollar bill because that is proof of God!" What does the back of the US Dollar have to do with proving God? It says "In God We Trust". This is a truly poor argument. Allow me to explain the real reason 'In God We Trust' is on the dollar.The phrase was placed on the back of the dollar by Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase "because of the increased religious sentiment existing during the Civil War." Clearly, it was A MAN who placed it there, not "an invisible man in the sky.""4. My opponent is error again. Without faith nothing would ever be challenged." Why? Why would nothing ever be challenged. Explain that, please. Enlighten me."What makes the world go around? Cash Money? PROOF GOD EXIST!!!"Actually, the gravitational pull of the sun "makes the world go around." This is a proven scientific fact that cannot be denied."Who told The President to put it there?"The president did not put it there. It was Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase. Many of the more religious population of citizens recommended he put it there."The big bang is accepted by most atheist, and is a new idea actually. Our early ancestors belived in God..."What did our early ancestry know about advanced science? Nothing. That is why they believed in God."My opponent mocks the Lord with his computer statement. When God created the human brain that is smarter that the computer, becuase it was created by human hand over a long period of time. The brain is a constant."First, I was giving an example. I was explaining how God could not have existed before the big bang. Secondly, the brain is not a constant. Haven't you heard of neuroplasticity? The brain can change, evolve, reprogram its neurons, et-cetera. "In America there is a bible placed in every hotel room in the nation that is under God. Proof #2Who told them to do it and how did they get the money?"No one told them to do that. They decided to do it themselves. What do you mean "how did they get the money?" Do you think God gave them the money? I think they got the money either from their bank loans or from their paying customers."Notice that the big bang or Darwin's book, that is (also a 'Theory' not a fact!) and does not compare with the bible................."The theory of evolution is a proven scientific fact. It has been tested, it has been proven in a lab, and there is decades of hard work and research behind proving it. It's repeatable. Do not try to disprove it, when you cannot. Evolution has been proven and it is a fact.ConclusionIn conclusion, I have refuted every argument my opponent has made. I have also followed the rules, which my opponent has failed to do. Unless my opponent can do a better job in this round, I would say he has lost the debate. I look forward to hearing what he has to say and I patiently await his arguments.MLA Citations"In God We Trust." AllAboutHistory.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 June 2014. . "Neuroplasticity." Medterms. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 June 2014. .