A modernized form of democracy should be the goal of every society

[Intro] Being stuffed with a cold turkey sandwich and having had my fill of a bag of chips, I will commence with the final round of this debate. [Actual Argument] My opponent, in this last and final round, is proceeding by attempting to convince the voting panel that we should always strive to acheive goals that are less than that of perfection with the idea in mind that we have a better chance of reaching these goals and won't be disapointed by the results. He even admits that a Utopian Government "would be great" and even equates it to perfection. However he again loses me in a stream of backward logic. He states that: "We should get Osama Bin Laden" "We should rid the world of starvation" These goals seem to entail perfection, especially ridding the world of starvation. However when the idea of a Utopian government is presented my opponent again casts off this goal with being quintessentially to hard to acheive. Voters do not be fooled by opponents attempt to essentially confuse the premise of this debate by again making false assumptions of how society should make its own goals. If my opponent has personal issues about how he makes his goals, then fine, but they have no place or comparision as to how society should make its own goals. Additionally my opponent has offered no clear examples of why striving to acheiving the average produces better results than striving to reach perfection other than an example of his personal weight loss goals. As a society we are constantly striving for perfection. A utopian government my opponent has conceded is above that of a democracy because it fully represents the peoples will. Society does not settle for less, society will not settle for less. My opponent is grasping at straws by making such a backward argument that striving to acheive less is always better. Next my opponent attempts to start a bonfire to blow even more smoke in the hopeless notion that perhaps no one will notice. A democratic republic is a democratic republic. It is not a "modernized democracy". My opponent even conceded the defintion was completely opinionated. Anyone with the ability to read can denote how indescribably vague my opponents definition was and how it essentially made no sense. Next time instead of using fancy but empty words to build a resolution, seek to fill the gaps with ones that have meaning and are clearly understood by the voters. Next my opponent returns to the skunk that has been bathed in a tub of perfume. After spraying the skunk with gallons of perfume and finding that the skunk indeed still stinks, I had hoped that my opponent would bury the skunk 10 feet under ground and pretend as though it never existed. However instead of doing that, my opponent has instead held the authors of Webster's Dictionary at gunpoint and demanded that they change the meaning of the word "stink" to mean something that smells lovely. In an almost inconprensible way, my opponent has again tried to convince the members of this site that "voting really does make you happy" despite the countless fallacies and contradictions in his logic. By resorting to the last resort, impeachment, my candidate has essentially come to a dead end. As should be obvious Bush has not (and yes I will obviously bring up relevant and current examples) complied with the will of the people and miraculously he was not impeached. Anyone with a TV can tell you how low Bush's approval rating was. The candidate has not complied with the will of the people and therefore those who voted in the Kerry vs Bush election voted because they were sad. . Yes as is obvious they can vote for a new president in 4 YEARS. However that is 4 years of unhappiness and not following the will of the people. My opponent has not refuted that the will of the people is not kept in mind by a democratic republic and has even given a clear example of the peoples will not being followed despite that its "kept in mind" "is essentially saying we should strive for a democratic government because he wishes for the will of the people to be upheld, which can only be done when the supreme power is vested in the people. " Again do not be confused. I am not "essentially" saying we should strive for a democratic REPUBLIC because I wish for the will of the people not only to be upheld or "kept in mind" as an afterthough as my opponent wishes. Society should strive for a Utopian government that represents the will of all people about every issue. My opponent is correct that this can only be done when supreme power is vested in the people and not in a ruler who blatantly does not follow the will of the people. [Grande Finale] My opponent has acknowledged that every governmental system has its downs. Since his resolution dictates that: "not if it is possible or if it would work" Therefore I am proposing that we strive for a governmental system (Utopian Government) that only has its up reguardless of whether it can work or not, we >>>>should<<<< strive for it. Lets stop and think here for a second. If somebody is running for president and you have no clue if they're going to abuse power or exactly what they are going to do is it possible to be fooled into voting for them? Absolutely. It is time to stop settling for less, as my opponent suggests we should do. It is time to stop voting for the lesser of two evils and vote for what we think is right and wrong. It is time that the will of the people be the equivalent of government and not just a sad distorted representation of it! If we are to strive for anything in life, let it be no less than that of perfection! [Note] 1. It is poor form in any debate to bring up new arguments in the last round that can't be refuted. It is absolutely unfair. 2. This debate is subject to the TOS as dictated by the user askbob. As this is the case, votes will only be counted that have explanations in the comments sections to prevent those who abuse the creation of multiple accounts. For clear examples of the TOS in use please view any of askbob's debates for an accurate picture. [Fine] Thank You.