Facist economics vs Capitalist economics

Since fascist economics aren't as well known as capitalist or communist economics I will explain to all readers of this debate that it is fascism includes private ownership but state control on the exchange of goods in a way that is most beneficial to the state. It is generally seen as ordered, hierarchical, and structured economy that serves national interest and efficiency. Individuality still exists in a fascist system as long as it's overall beneficial to the nation. That means if you wanted to buy Dr.Pepper soda and your friend didn't want to then that doesn't conflict with fascism unless the soda was overall harmful to the economy which no fascist regimes have banned unless there are harmful drugs in it. Where individuality is limited is when it hinders efficiency. Take opium industry for example. Under capitalist economics this industry could theoretically exist unless non-capitalist policies prevent its existence. Opium generally decreases efficiency within an economy because if we look at China and Opium wars then we see when opium was allowed to be bought, workers started overdosing and their worked less efficiently. Majority of other industries started producing less efficiently due to lower work productivity and economic crash happened in China. However under fascism the government would take strong steps to make opium purchase illegal to protect the efficiency of the economy. Fascism also protects the environment efficiently because it's rarely self-incentive to be environmentally friendly. Although some users will try to buy green Earth goods only to encourage green Earth products in capitalist system, a corporation could just seem environmentally friendly but not actually be and still lull in those green Earth customers because its goal end goal would be selling its products and not protecting the environment. However under fascism if the government wanted to efficiently and effectively protect the environment then it would set regulations and check products to make sure they are environmentally healthy rather than only appear healthy to lull in customers. Having a healthy environment in and of itself also helps the economy efficiently. Under capitalism corporations would find it in their best interest to pollute rivers making fishing and other aquatic industries run less efficiently. Under fascism the corporations would instead clean the water before disposing it allowing fishery and other aquatic industries to run smoothly. Overall the economy would be more efficient if the waste water was treated before being disposed of. If say a group of corporations in an area wanted to make a highway road to increase economic activity fascism can help those corporations more than capitalism can. Under capitalism we would get what is known as the 'Three monks' effect. Since capitalism is anti-tax and the only taxes that exist under capitalist countries are part of non capitalist policies, taxes will be less under capitalism. Therefore under pure capitalism the only chance of building this road is through a voluntary group donation from the corporations to fund road building. However it is in each corporation's best interest to contribute as little as possible and help for the others to fund the road. This means in the end an inefficient road is created if one is created at all hence 'Three monks'. However under fascism, the government will immediately try to increase the efficiency of those corporations by extracting money to construct the most efficient road possible. All corporations would benefit from this effective road even if all had to pay more each than if each corporation tried to contribute as little as possible. If say a communist red army began invading a country to seize private property to distribute it and destroy the economy in the process then fascism would protect its economy much more efficiently. Under capitalism like in the above example military funding would be very hard because each corporation would avoid donating money and hope others contribute large sums. In fact some might hope other industries are overturned to destroys competitors! They would ineffectively try to protect themselves from a doomed inefficient economic system. However under fascism the government would take immediate action to withdraw funds and make the corporation contribute a lot more the war effort. This would increase the chance those corporations could protect themselves from communist invaders spreading inefficiency and all corporations would benefit from this. Under fascism individual choice to occupation is performed unless its economically inefficient. Sometimes individuals themselves don't know what job best suits them and hence we have lots of government funded personality and work tests to find out best occupations suited. Fascist government helps individuals find the job they work most effectively which the individual may not have realized until the government helped out. Sometimes individuals don't have enough contacts and ability to reach co-workers who may have a specialized skill they may need to rely on but under fascism, government will actively seek out and put people who would be otherwise unreachable together so they together can work efficiently. For example if I needed an artisan who can decorate a pottery in a special way, the government which acts over the country can help establish communication between the few people that can do this and me rather than me going all over the country for this. This would promote efficiency. A big difference between government influenced and privately incentived is end goal. Government would want companies to make best possible products while companies only need to appear to have best products. If a company could have a good quality product or a cheaper made product that appears just as high quality then companies would make that cheaper product as many do under capitalism today due to profit being end goal. Under fascism companies would manually have to make more usable products that customers can use more efficiently rather than ones that appear pretty. For a specific example if a company under capitalism wanted to sell fabric, it would be in its best interest to sell buffed up fabric because it appears big. Under fascism a company would have to make that size fabric with more actual fabric material. This means other industries who are unaware of how that company makes fabric will run more efficiently from the better quality fabric when making things like clothes. Many capitalist societies in fact have competition and greed directly conflict. Often corporations that make similar products will negotiate a deal to combat competition between them because they are greedy. They make agreements to limit products sold and shoot up the prices of each product. Since they are all agreeing to doing this then competition is destroyed by greed. However under fascism this would be an inefficient corrupt deal and government would prevent such a deal from occurring to protect competition and allow products to be made in larger bulks at cheaper prices. For a more specific example if only Mr. corrupt and me knew how to make flying cars then we would strike a deal where we both make fewer cars but each car is higher price then we would both make more money but economies that need people in flying cars would be less efficient and we circumvented competition that would otherwise drive down prices because our greed was uncontrolled. If under fascism we would never be able to do this and industries that rely on their employees using flying cars would be able to run more efficiently.