Regardless of the existence of God, the Bible is wrong about many, many things.

(Regardless of the existence of God,) the bible is wrong about many, many things. re⋅gard⋅less  –adjective 1. having or showing no regard; heedless; unmindful –adverb 2. without concern as to advice, warning, hardship, etc.; anyway: I must make the decision regardless. —Idiom3. regardless of, in spite of; without regard for: They'll do it regardless of the cost. --> Every one of my opponents claims requires complete REGARD for the existence of God. This is an exact contradiction to his resolution. ************* My opponent failed to attach his claim of free will to any canon of the Council of Trent. His claims that "most" denominations adopt this notion is both weak, and false. Even his own provided link from wikipedia provides adequate examples of the opposite. The Council of Trent was organized to "combat," if you will the reformation going on at the time. The Council of Trent is Roman Catholic. Non the less,.. my opponent has not shown any canon from the Council of Trent to satisfy his resolution. "Free will is more or less universally accepted," --> WEAK,... This more or less proves my opponent's point NULL. "And he gave us free will, that's doctrine, interfering with us is interfering with free will, he does not do that." --> Unless this is a mistake on my opponents part, he just conceded God does not interfere with free will. My opponent claims that I proved his point in the Bible being contradictory,... this is not the case at all. You see, the bible is clear series of situations that led up to God determining the time of our Savior. Repentance was the requirement of salvation. Noah, Abraham, Jacob,..etc, etc, were chosen by GRACE of God, this is described in the Council of Trent's decrees. My opponent was using the Straw Man fallacy. "If God communicates, he takes away, choice, by showing his existence, he takes away the very element that gives belief value." --> Not that I concede that this proves the bible wrong, which it does not,... I am pretty sure that absolute knowledge of existence is what gives value to belief,.. certainly God communicating with someone wouldn't "de-value" someone belief. Of course the main point remains,... the bible does not claim free will,.. thus, ruling another point of my opponent, NULL. "I am disproving the claims of the bible by accepting it as completely true, and showing how it contradicts itself, that is called a reductio ad absurdum my worthy opponent." --> Haha,.. well ordinarily a clever maneuver,... however for you, my esteemed, opponent, you are missing several KEY elements to your entire argument showing reductio ad absurdium. 1.) My opponent never cleared a premise. a.) My opponent claimed several times that God contradicts himself. - This problematic because for one, we were not to assume existence of God,.. we were not even to give regard to his existence. - for two, my opponent was to show that the Bible was wrong, not God. b.) My opponent wanted us to adhere to the rulings by the Council of Trent - My opponent never once provided a source of his own claims from the Council. - His whole argument derived from anything other than the Council should be nullified. 2.) My opponent did not show a contradiction to a premise. a.) My opponents attempt at pinning me with Straw Man fallacy failed. b.) The bible says that Jesus WAS God in the body of man. c.) The Bible never claimed free will and even if it did, my opponent failed to show that God disturbed free will of man. ************ Closing,.. My opponent says he accomplished reductio ad absurdum, however my opponent did not even relate to his own premise at any time, and of course failed at showing a contradiction to anything. My opponent says Christianity widely adopts the idea of free will,... even if this is the case and he satisfied his own guidelines of relating to the Council of Trent,.. He still fails at proving his resolution true. Say, free will exists, say God interferes with free will which contradicts the churches belief in free will,... say all that is taken into consideration. My opponent still fails to show that the Bible is wrong in many, many ways. Not one verse or quote was provided by my opponent from the Bible showing that free will exists to man according to the Bible. Ergo, the bible was not even remotely close to being proven wrong by my worthy opponent. Thank you to my opponent,.. and thank you to the viewers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ O