Ray will get laid before Ethan.

1) If you got raped, you wouldn't like it, otherwise you wouldn't call it rape (or sometimes scream out "RAAAAAAAAAPE! "). And if you were too sexy for your pants, you'd be pantless. And you don't walk around pantless. 2) OK, but almost every good-looking girl (and the ones you've told me you liked) are all taller than you. Also, you shouldn't have searched "short sexy men" but rather "short men", because you aren't sexy. If you want we can ask for some testimonies. That debate was only praising your sexiness because you were one of the topics. 3) Just because your muscle weighs more doesn't mean you're more muscular. From dictionary. com: musï¿½cuï¿½lar Audio Help /ˈmʌskyələr/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[muhs-kyuh-ler] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective 1. of or pertaining to muscle or the muscles: muscular strain. 2. dependent on or affected by the muscles: muscular strength. 3. having well-developed muscles; brawny. 4. vigorously and forcefully expressed, executed, performed, etc. , as if by the use of a great deal of muscular power: a muscular response to terrorism. 5. broad and energetic, esp. with the implication that subtlety and grace are lacking: a muscular style. 6. reflected in physical activity and work: a muscular religion. 7. Informal. having or showing power; powerful: a muscular vehicle. If you look at definition 3, it says "having well-developed muscles". As I exercise/work out and/or play sports on a daily basis, my muscles are more developed than yours. If you want we can compare muscles, and I'll prove it. Also, if our roles were reversed (you being muscular but still the same height, me being taller but well. .. not muscular. haha), I'm sure you'd be able to beat me up then, because height doesn't really matter as much unless it's a huge difference. 4) One has not not seen me play in a competitive/organized game. I don't think another one has either. 5) You just said "fauna" again yesterday, so it's no longer one time usage. But the point is, people aren't exactly gonna give you smiles and thumbs-ups when you use big words that nobody knows. You've used other words and people have turned around other times, but I don't remember what words you used. (It was last year when you sat next to me. ) 6) I fail to see how initials are an invasion of privacy, as you can't tell who a person is by initials. I do respect privacy, and just because my opponent claims I don't isn't a reason to vote con, since it has nothing to do with getting laid. Next, although my opponent claims that "my opponent could lie about whether these girls actually did such proclaiming, as I don't know them all", he forgets that the same applies to him, even more so because he did not even provide so much as initials. Also, just because he doesn't know as many girls as I do, does not disprove this information, and if anything, it shows I have a better chance of getting laid because I know more girls. Then he calls me "attention starved", but really if he had as many girls as me loving him, he could at least remember as many as I did. And even if I was a stalker, it wouldn't be a reason to vote con (see his privacy claims). Although he says he could beat me on this point, he proposes a tie. I suspect this is because he can't hope to name as many girls as I did. Also, I just talked to Ethan, and he doesn't want to name these people even to me in person, to "protect privacy". He also claims that since I didn't exactly confirm these sources, they are invalid. However, as the same goes for him, this point is null. His word is no better than mine. 7) Even though the show may be fictional, the title is completely different. The show could be named "Debate. org is a website", a fact, but still be a fictional sitcom. His Case: 1) I don't have to tell my parents I'm hiring a prostitute, and I have money now, so I can get at least some amount of sexytime, counting as getting laid. 2) The definition of "contact" has nothing to do with that, because it's genital contact (contact between two genitals), and once again, your hand is not a genital. 3) Once again, this point is null, because the exact same could happen to you. As I said before, your word is no better than mine. 4) I'm allowed to want to tap more than one girl, I just happened to choose a very tappable one. lol "I have shown that it is impossible for PRO to prove his point. " If this is true, then it is impossible for CON to prove its point also. By taking the role of con, you have to prove that my claim is false. However for the very reason you state that it is impossible for me to prove my point. .. "No one can predict the future. He has to prove that he will get laid first, even if he was amazingly layable in the eyes of girls, he would have to prove that he won't spontaneously combust, or that we won't explode. " . .. you prove that it is impossible, therefore, for you to disprove me. Since "no one can predict the future", you can't tell if I will not get laid before you.