Apple is superior than Microsoft.

On to my rebutallsR1: Apple is better than Microsoft in ManagementPro claims that Apple is better, because it focuses on the future. I'll wait for Pro to explain how Apple does that. I can prove Microsoft isn't doing that anymore, because their former focus was to just sell software. Now they sell the Surface Tablet, and they made their software just an annual update. Also, Apples computers are expensive, simply because they use quality material. Which is why some ultrabooks are the same price. The difference however, is with Ultrabooks you get better specs. Your source is outdated, because all these changes happened after they released WIndows 8 (2012). . https://www.microsoft.com...R2: Apple is better than Microsoft for workActually, I did refute your argument. If it were simple, and free, it doesn't correlate to why more people still choose Office for Mac over iWork. Also, another big one is file format. Since using Office is the norm, companies wont be able to switch, because iWork is only avalible on Mac. Unlike Office, which is avaliable on both platforms. R3: Apple is better than Microsoft in ComputersBefore I start, the argument should be software, not computers. Pro says Apple gets fever viruses because it provides free updates. Updates in general don't have anything to do with viruses. Only security updates do, and Microsoft gives them daily free of charge. Also, I ask Pro to give sources that prove Microsoft creates viruses. Also your source backfired on you. "It says as Apple Macintosh computers gain market share and are used by more people, virus infections are becoming more common than they used to be. "R4: SoftwarePro says that every update of Microsoft has to be paid for. This is completely false, because Windows 8.1 was a free update. Also, Office 365 isn't the only option. You can always buy it all at once. Also, to answer your question, you should keep in mind, that the App Store was released on July 10, 2008, whereas the Windows Store was released February 29, 2012. Keep in mind, however this is only for the touch oriented apps. If I compared the legacy apps (4 million) to the app store Apps (1.5 million) it is much greater. Keep in mind, the legacy app count was estimated by ex-CEO Steve Balmer in 2010. The number likely changed. Also, "googling it" doesn't take alot of effort. Pro is saying overall Mac is safer, but I argue that it limits options in creating software. Also, for somebody like a computer programmer, he can't do anything in Mac, because he needs to become an offical developer, which costs $99 a year. In windows, he is free to just make the program, and he can make money. Your last sentence, I explained earlier. If you are careful, you don't have to worry about viruses. . http://www.quora.com...R5: ValuePro's arguments about Apple Computers having something new also applies to PC Makers. Also, Pro needs to prove that a $200 laptop can't connect from 100 ft. Pro's arguing regarding gaming is already unfair. He is comparing a $1200 laptop to a $400 laptop. If I bump up the price tag to 800 dollars, I can play Minecraft at a high FPS also. And, Pro please provide sources that say Minecraft runs at 150 fps on a $1200 mac. Keep in mind, it can't include the 15 inch Macbook Pro, because that costs more that $1200. . http://shop.lenovo.com...R6: Xbox and PC gaming. Pro already says, "the games have to be configured to be played in both networks, mostly they are made and configured for PC. " In other words, gaming are generally designed for PC. Games for macs aren't natively developed for the platform, companies hire guys like Aspyr to port the game to the mac platform. Also, I should have been more clear on my 2nd argument. I meant to talk about high end games like Battlefield 4, Metro Last Light. A Macbook Pro cannot, handle that at ultra settings. , because the Intel graphics chip isn't powerful enough. With a laptop like the Y50, I can get the standard of 30 to 40 fps on ultra settings, which is also at 1920x1080