The Liberal/progressive Democrat's are anti-woman!

I was stunned to find out that republicans don't like liberal democrats. His information was indeed enlightening. Lets start round two, readdressing my opponent's original position: The Liberal/progressive Democrat's are anti-woman! The reader will see a theme in my retort to my opponent's perspective and selective examples, as I continually attempt to bring him back to his original unsupported rhetoric, and my response that Liberal Democrats are not Anti Woman. 1) Harry Reid called Sarah Palin, "Shrill and Sarcastic", but didn't call Obama shrill or sarcastic. - Harry Reid's opinion of Sarah Palin's speech is hardly an anti woman position despite my opinion's attempt to paint it as such. It is simply anti-Palin. Personally I believe that Hillary Clinton's speeches sound robotic and cold and calculated, which means I don't like her delivery. That is clearly not anti Woman, it is anti Clinton. My opponent might ask himself if he or anyone believes that Obama sounds 'shrill'. Regarding sarcasm and Obama's statement "Those people to cling to guns and religion! " it could be interpreted as sarcastic or accurate, depending on your understanding of the people he was describing. Personally speaking, I believe it accurately describes the hayseeds he was talking about, and he was being easy on them. But that is my own personal opinion, and doesn't reflect liberal democrats, as I am neither. So my opponent's first example, is found wanting for establishing a connection between Liberals and an anti woman position. 2) Has my opponent heard the remarks from the Obama campaign questioning whether Palin, with several small children, is up to the task of VP? - I am surprised that my opponent finds questioning the qualifications of a person with small town mayoral experience and a few months as Governor sexist. In reading the official Obama campaign statements, it quickly becomes clear that they are careful to not associate, being a woman or mother with a lack of ability, on the contrary they talk about lack of experience. My opponent may want to recall whether it is fair for republicans to be called racist for questioning Obama's lack of experience, and consider whether he himself is guilty of doing the exact same thing in Palin's case? Republicans are not racist for questioning Obama's qualification, as Democrats are not Sexist in questioning Palins qualification. 3) MSNBC has sidelined its two most liberal anchors, Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann, due to their blatant liberal bias in their campaign coverage. - Perhaps my opponent should consider why a news organization, intent on propagating liberal bias would 'sideline' its two most liberal commentators? In my experience, a media outlet intent on establishing bias would do the opposite. I would like to thank my opponent for providing a wonderful example of how the media is in fact attempting to police itself away from the bias that he alleges. Perhaps Fox News would benefit from mirroring MSNBC's attempt at equality, but then they would lose viewers like my opponent, intent on calling conservative bias, equal time. Fox News "We report, give it a conservative slant, then tell you that we are right and our competitors are biased" Murdock is indeed a genius. 3) The fact that the Press and even the Obama campaign chose to focus solely on Palin's "Small town" mayor ship, but conveniently disregard that Palin is an extremely effective Governor of the largest state in the Union, Alaska, shows a left leaning bias. - After a difficult search on the Internet, I was able to discover that Palin has been a Governor for less than 2 years. I am sure the reader will share my shock at this discovery, especially after reading my opponents contention that she has more experience than Obama (2 State legislator, 1997–2004 - U. S. Senator, 2005–present) and Biden (County Council Legislature Wilmington 1970 January 4, 1971 January 3, 1973 4th District U. S. Senator Legislature Washington, DC 1972 January 3, 1973 January 3, 1979 U. S. Senator Legislature Washington, DC 1978 January 3, 1979 January 3, 1985 U. S. Senator Legislature Washington, DC 1984 January 3, 1985 January 3, 1991 U. S. Senator Legislature Washington, DC 1990 January 3, 1991 January 3, 1997 U. S. Senator Legislature Washington, DC 1996 January 3, 1997 January 3, 2003 U. S. Senator Legislature Washington, DC 2002 January 3, 2003 January 3, 2009) combined. At this point the reader should be starting to see a theme of intentional ignorance of facts on the part of my opponent that seriously undermines his contention that Liberal Democrats are Anti Woman. 3b) I challenge my opponent to put forth one, not two, but ONE negative news article about Obama from any of the Network news operations and/or their affiliates. To make it a bit easier for my opponent, I will expand that to include The New York Times and Washington post. -1 CBS' Dean Reynolds: "From votes for abortion rights, to lessening penalties for marijuana use, to raising doubts about capital punishment, Obama is a traditional liberal. " -2 ABC's "World News" has done a story on Obama voting "present" nearly 130 times as an Illinois legislator -3 "NBC Nightly News" has followed up a two-week-old Times piece about Obama compromising on Senate legislation affecting a nuclear energy company that contributed to his campaign -4 "CBS Evening News" segment reviewed a series of negative points -- Obama's controversial pastor, his ties to indicted fundraiser Tony Rezko, voting present, the nuclear contributions and the lack of a flag pin. -5 "Obama's unnecessary and imprudent statement impugns the sincerity or intelligence of those vulgar sorts who still choose to wear a flag pin" Bill Kristol, New York Times Challenge accepted and over achieved by 5X. Once again, I would like to thank my opponent for setting me up for victory with his unsupported allegations. And once again, how does 'biased Media' support his contention that Liberals are Anti Woman? 4) Can my opponent put forth proof that Sen. Robert Byrde has publicly renounced his affiliation with the KKK? - He has never admitted an affiliation with the KKK, which would make renouncing it a bad political move. Perhaps my opponent should consider why a loyal KKK supporter would endorse a black man for president? But even more pertinent, how a racist old man supports his contention that Liberal Democrats in general are anti woman? Now that my opponents points have been exposed as anemic at best, lets evaluate why Liberal Democrats are considered pro woman by, of all people, Women. Statistics: Women in the U. S. Senate now total 16, with 11 Democrats and 5 Republicans. Women in the U. S. House of Representatives now total 77, with 56 Democrats and 21 Republicans In 2007, there were a total of nine female Governors, six of whom are Democrat. Source: . http://womenincongress.house.gov... I urge the reader to consider how an Anti woman party could possibly have such a commanding lead in female representation? Does my conservative opponent believe that they are stupid and don't understand the issues they represent? I also urge the reader to consider what policy positions attract women to the democratic party and consider why such a majority of Women view them as pro woman. Following is a link to WomenforObama, which describes in their own words, exactly why they support the liberal democrat candidate over the republican candidate. Perhaps my opponent can learn by paying close attention to McCain's voting record regarding women's rights and note the reasons they list for not supporting Palin. . http://www.womenforbarackobama.com... I submit, that my opponent is flat wrong with his contention.