I challenge you to a debate over gun regulations!

R1: more guns less crimeLet's refute the rifle thing first, this is funny because if you read my early arguments it showed when rifle regulations droped crime lowered. And you concede more hand guns = less crime. So basically that is a gun, more guns = less crime, so oyu basically concede this.Concurrently, the FBI reports that gun sales – especially of assault-style rifles and handguns, two main targets of gun-control groups – are up at least 12 percent nationally since the election of President Obama [1]let me say this, assualt RIFLE. RIFLE. Good?And at the same time:that violent crimes – including gun crimes – dropped dramatically in the first six months of 2009, with murder down 10 percent across the US as a whole. [1]now the guns kill people part part:As Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan once put it, "guns don't kill people, bullets do." The problem of gun violence begins and ends with bullets, so let's focus on them. [2]guns dont kill people, bullets do. (I even disgree on that as bullets are just as inanimant)People kill people. look at source 3 photo, the gun used to be racked and safe, this dumb arse picked it up. It is only danrous with peopel like him.Now I have been to frontsight firearms training insitutute, gret place to shoot (learn to shoot) defensivly. They made a good point, a gun cannot think, it cannot do anything without a human. So it cannot kill without either a hun pulling trigger, a dumb guy like in source 3, or a crazy. GUNS DO NOT GO OFF IF YOU DON"T TOUCH IT. [4]Also in my mountian house we tested it out, we loaded a .45 15 round weapon, put it on the counter and mdad said "do no touch this we are seeing if it kills people" it never hurt anyone. A gun itself CANNOT go off unless a human does it. Guns do ot kill people, people kill people. I will have a few more more guns less crime sources:This is just one example of the the 4,109 justified defensive gun use instances that occurs on average every day across the US, according to a National Institute of Justice Study. But it’s not just anecdotal evidence saying more guns equals less crimes. There is enough statistical data to support such claims. [5]His conclusion in that study: 1) Victims who have the ability to defend themselves offer a legitimate deterrence threat and 2) “Criminals…respond rationally to deterrence threats.” [5]more guns = less crimenow you will say they are crazy. False only % of criminals are crazy, 97% CAN BE DETTERED. So th guns 97% might be dettered, the 3% will still do it. Without guns that 3% will still do it, but more of that 97% will do it. So in all technicalities guns help 97%. These numbers are from 6.R2: gun control doesn't workUganda; i was refering to goverment abuse not crime. Also Hitler, stalin, all gun contorl advocates, experts agree gun control works *face of stalin hitler an Mao on a postar board)You have no source sbac=king this police claim. I also proved they are more araid of armed people then police, therefore a more populated populace has more of an impact. Also police are for second ammendment:According to the 13th annual survey that was sent to 21,000 sheriffs and police chiefs across the country, by the National Association of Chiefs of Police, the vast majority of officers believed that citizens should be able to buy guns. [7]Also let me show you stats on the UK:A 1998 study by the US Department of Justice found that there were 40 percent more muggings in England, and burglary rates were almost 100 percent higher than in the United States. And, counter-intuitively, rates of crimes using handguns is on the rise. In 1999-2000, crimes using handguns were at a seven year high. [7]SO their crime rate is higher then ours (and remeber their extreme gun regulations). Also my oponent didn't read under his graph provided, his raph (if you look at it) PROVES MY POINT! the British homicide rate has averaged 52% higher since the outset of the 1968 gun control law and 15% higher since the outset of the 1997 handgun ban. [8]ALL FROM THAT SOURCE.That is a DIRECT correlation, after the bans crime was higher, as it was in chicago, DC, and UK. Your graph proves my point, after gun control was passed criem rose. You my opponent have fuled my case. Oh for that Utah california this it has it at the very bottom second to last paraghaph. http://reason.com...Also They are in the same region, so they have similar socio problems, furth more all of Utah is in one place. SO their crime rate in that one place is just as tightly packed as CA.Also for DC it rose slightly then rose significantly, then borke the graph. SO yes a huge change happened 11 years later, right after thee was still an increase.R3: conceal carryYour case is flawed. Muggers are scared as 97% of them are sane, also if many peopel where armed there may be a witness. Further mor ethey are afraid of armed victims:Q. do you check if your victem is armed?51% say yes (agree)30% said super yes (strongly agree) [10]So this says they are scared. Let me quote the source:"Fifty-six percent of the felons surveyed agreed that "A criminal is not going to mess around with a victim he knows is armed with a gun;" 74% agreed that "One reason burglars avoid houses when people are at home is that they fear being shot." [10]If they know or sense your armed they'll leave you alone! Your criminal and detterence thing. As i said befe 97% are sane, only 3% are undettered.I have proven the FBI stats = more guns less crime with =like 3 soruces per rou ._.. ALso here is the correlation:gun sales rise, criem dropssecond correlationgun control laws expire and go away, less crime. 2 examples on how it relates. Read my arguments.R4: countries with gun controlcountries with gun contorl have high crime rates: Reliable statistics on crime in other parts of the world have been released that show America to be safer than most countries with strict anti-gun laws. The International Crime Victims Survey, conducted by Leiden University in Holland, shows that England has much higher levels of crime than the U.S. Among industrialized nations, England and Wales rank second overall. Twenty-six percent of British citizens have been victimized by violent crime. [11] direct c/p above ^ "From available statistics, among (the 27) countries surveyed, it is difficult to find a correlation between the existence of strict firearms regulations and a lower incidence of gun-related crimes. . . . (I)n Canada a dramatic increase in the percentage of handguns used in all homicides was reported during a period in which handguns were most strictly regulated" [12]SP gun contl doesn't lower crime, and canada with high regulation has high crime. Also later on it mentions germeny high rime and gun control. Low on room must move on.R5 israel etcSwitzerland everyone owns gun, my other sources. Everyone owns a gun: more guns less crimeIsrael: peopel are still afraid of armed people. armed peopel = care villans.Norway: A gun is an industry. Killing a gun indistry would hurt economy. The gun inditry makes: 31 billion dollars per year in the industry (USA) so restricting guns = - 31 billion dollars in economic growth. [13]out of room.http://www.csmonitor.com.... [1]http://www.huffingtonpost.com... [2]http://www.peopleofwalmart.com... [3]Front sight, negligent discharge lecture [4]http://ivn.us... [5]Front sight lecture [6] (forgot it's name darnit) http://www.saf.org... [7]http://www.justfacts.com... [8]http://www.disastercenter.com... [9]http://www.nraila.org... [10]http://www.freerepublic.com... [11]http://www.nraila.org... [12]http://www.thehighroad.org... [13]