The God Hypothesis qualifies as the best scientific explanation for the origins of existence

The God Hypothesis indeed qualifies as a scientific explanation for several reasons. it is a rational hypothesis, it does not violate occam's razor, there is enough evidence that would describe the nature of this cause and connect the data points to this cause, and its falsifiable: 1. Logically, there cannot be an infinite regress of causes, which means there has to be an uncaused first cause. Since this is the case, this cause would have to be limitless and have no flaws or weaknesses. In addition, This first cause could not be the universe itself because if time was infinite we would of never of gotten here. 2. Now, its time to connect the data points to the God Hypothesis: The Space-Time Theorem of General Relativity clearly shows that space, time, and matter and energy all had a concrete beginning. This means whatever caused it could not of been a natural cause where there is measurable dimensions to it. If there could not be any dimensions to it, then there cannot be a beginning or end to the cause. If there was not time before it, then the cause would be timeless. Thus, the attribute of this cause would be omni-present, eternal, and immaterial. The fundamental laws and constants of nature came into being immediately after the big bang perfectly calibrated ,within an infinite set of values, to allow the existence of intelligent life. This not only suggest that the cause is intelligent but the degree of intelligence and knowledge would be infinite for the cause to choose the right values every time within an infinite set. Thus, the attribute of this cause must be omniscience. Our universe was created out of nothing perfectly fine-tuned to support life from the very beginning. This is the definition of a miracle which is something that defies the laws of physics. Thus, the attribute of this cause must be omni-potent. Life could not and did not exist around the time the singularity expanded and "life comes from life?" , according to existing data. In addition, Information only comes from minds and outside of a system and the DNA has an unbelievable amount of information. This along with every other empirical oberservations show that only intelligent life can create other intelligent life. There is virtually no observations showing simple life forms becoming or creating complex life forms. Thus, the cause of the big bang would not only have to be the cause for the existence of life but intelligent life. Lastly, this cause would have to be a personal disembodied mind for it to have the personal desire to create the universe and then freely choose to act upon that desire to create a finely tuned universe that allows the existence of intelligent life from the very beginning. Then, choose the planet Earth, over a trillion other planets, to inhabit intelligent life. 3. The God Hypothesis does not violate Occam's Razor, which is the simplest explanation should always be favored over the complex ones. The reason why the God Hypothesis is the simplest explanation is because its a rational hypothesis that is also supported by many points of data as I demonstrated earlier. It postulates only one cause and its falsifiable, which leads me to my last segment here. 4. If﻿ you could demonstrate how the cause of the universe could still be natural, then it would completely negate and falsify the God hypothesis entirely. you can either do this or do it the hard way and falsify each of my claims I made about the universe. Its your call