Fascism is a superior form of rule than theocracy

On the Story of Moses: Adaptation to Modern TimesFirstly, we don't live in a world where human interaction is limited to people of your own/neighbouring countries. The world is now smaller in the sense that everyone is connected. The opponent uses Moses as his only example of a theocracy; if a theocracy like that one of Moses exists today, then we would find that the theocracy would be very difficult to sustain, as internal and external dissent will always arise. Also, the opponent talks about how commandments outline what the government is to be. However, these commandments can and would be violated; fascism, however, has no commandments, and its outline has been ambigous (to a point where the three main points exist as things that should be implemented, not followed). When the highest person has to follow a law, and only a divine entity could punish that person, then humans in nature are selfish, and they will turn an ignorant eye into this law. This is exactly what happened with the Pope (during the Papal Era); he sent men to fight for his own political reasons during the Crusades, in which it was diverted from its original purpose (reclaiming the Holy Lands).The theocratic state of Moses would also do poorly in a comparison of economics between a fascist country like the Third Reich. This would be attributed to the proto-capitalist system that would be adopted by the theocratic state. The theocratic state would most likely adopt an economical model based on the teachings of their prophets; this led to the nationalization of many industries and the departure of the market production process to a government planning proccess. With external hatred coming from outside, sanctions would most likely be implemented on these countries, straining their economies to the max. An example of this is Iran; the Iraninan Rial fell to almost 28,000 rials per dollar in 2012. This is a sign of a low economy; Iran has an economic growth rate of 1%, even though it has 10% of the world's proven oil resources. This is because of the economy; it isn't a market-based one, but a government planning-based one. Even with a government planned economy, its unemployment is now exceeding 15%; this clearly shows that a theocratic state, based on highly religious principals, will cause an economic disaster in the country. If we were to look at the case of the Third Reich however, we would see a high difference; although inflation control and other programs (based on Keynesian principles) caused massive debt, by 1938, unemployment was non-existant and wages increased by 11%.The most important aspect, however, that makes fascism superior than theocracy is the justification for ruling; the athiestic community is growing at such a fast rate that believing that god exists is looked upon as a belief for the conservative minority. What this means is that if a state is justified by god, then the whole state exists on a minority belief; a state does not run like that. Take the Soviet Union for example; communism is its justification. The communist thought was pushed to the minority by the growing educated elite (who received words about democracy and capitalism from America) and the communist state ultimately fell. Therefore, we come to a concluding formula that if a state's ideology, or main justification, is pushed to the minority, then the state will fall. This makes a theocracy unsustainable; however, we must look at fascism. It's main justification, national honour, can never be pushed the minority because a nation, unless that nation is completely dissolved, is a symbol of unity and power of one people. If we were to push nationalism to the minority, then patriotism would still be in the minds of the many liberals and anarchists who did so. National pride can never be pushed to the minority; fascism's justification is eternal and it is not to be doubted.It is because of these reasons, fascism is superior to a theocratic state.