god persecutes gays, Blasphemers, Adulterers, Those that work on the sabbath, Don't worship him etc

Hello reader, I apologize that you had to go through all three of those posts! Only one more left and you will be free. Allow me to start again by responding to my opponent (although I will speak only to you). "Only a mind of blah blah black s--t have you any stool, Yes sir yes sir, 3 bags fool" So not only is he completely erratic, He's racist too! "Oh and I've been doing this for 43+ years. " Yes, And for 43+ years he has been losing. My opponent goes onto claim that it is because of one, Single voter, And yet, I have yet to discover an atheist who has experienced this same treatment. Reader, This is because it isn't true, Although you knew that! "Yah might want to reread that one then get back to your noodled brain" Here he refers to when I say that backwardseden bullies people for fun. This is is exact quote from that debate: "I'm a bit of an arrogant sarcastic (I do love sarcasm just in case you haven't noticed). . . Myself and who. . . Knows where I come up with those insults? They just plop into my brain. There's never any harmful intent. I do hope you got a good laugh or two from them. " See? And for those wondering about the ellipses, I added them to cut out any cussing because I would like to avoid losing points for cussing. "Here on DDO have no genuine friends or loved ones. None. A HUGE red flag. Genuine? Those that will go way way wayyyyyyyyyyyy out of their way in times of dire need and never ask you a single question. Those that would take a bullet for you, Die for you. I have 5, Yes 5 genuine friends like these because we don"t B. S. Each other with nonsensical bull whereas with you its part of your everyday life. You have no evidence for what you state or claim and people back off from crap without evidence. You did this to yourself. You deserve it. Its apparently what you want. And if it continues you will die alone. " My opponent is right, Here on debate. Org I have NO genuine friends or loved ones! That is because all of my genuine friends and loved ones are out here in the real world, As I'm sure yours are, Reader! Plus I literally joined the day before I posted this argument. My opponent says I have no evidence, Yet I do, And it is all throughout my first argument. My opponent says that Christians will die alone, And yet my Christian family absolutely loves me, And I love them! So this is not true either. "By the way, When intelligence and education is not available, And thus excuses hit for pretend time, This is how you lose your genuine friends and loved ones more often than not, So beware, As you have clearly done, It is within my right to belittle, Dehumanize, And humiliate you. Or I can walk away. This is something that is taught in college. Btw, Climbing under people"s skin is one helluva great debating tactic and it works wonders. Trump, The worst president of all time is an absolute master at that. Though who would want to be as dry, As droll, And as furious, And as ANGRY, And as extremely self centered as he clearly is? I also know how to bait people extremely well. I DO NOT present all of my evidence right off the bat. " LOL. Now reader, We can actually start to laugh. He says "It is within my right to belittle, Dehumanize, And humiliate you, " because he claims that I use excuses? HAHAHAHAHA! Yet we must kill all the Christians who belittle, Dehumanize, And humiliate atheists! This is just one huge example of my opponent's hypocrisy. He says I use excuses, And proceeds to give no examples of my excuses. Then he says "Btw, Climbing under people"s skin is one helluva great debating tactic and it works wonders. " So here we go, My opponent himself admits to his faults. Convenient for me! The only thing we agree on is that Trump is the worst president ever. "'I said no to all of those questions. ' OK GREAT! The debate never got that far because his idiocies interfered. Now what does this mean? It means that he does no follow his god. I also put forth more questions in RD1 that well jeez, Where are the answers to them? " My opponent says it is my fault that the debate never got that far, Yet I answered those questions back in round one. However, You, My diligent reader, Already know that! What he said is that I do not follow my God because I said no to those questions. This is competely wrong because those commandments are under the old covenant. Please refer back to my previous arguments if you did not see what I said (I do not want to waste characters copying/pasting them here). As to those other questions, I will answer them here: "where do you think you stand with YOUR god? My God loves me and I love him. "why do you believe? " Because I have seen the proof and have decided that I want a relationship with Jesus Christ. "why 'should' you believe since your god is in no possible way moral? " My God is moral, Which is more reason for me to believe! I already disproved your argument that he is immoral in the first round. "its already been proven unto you that there is no such a thing as a christian, So there"s no need to get into that again" A Christian is someone who believes in God and Jesus Christ. That is like saying there is no such thing as Flat Earthers because the earth is round. And yet they exist, And so do Christians. "Next, He proceeds to say that I have not provided 50 reasons why God would not use text" WRONG! Why is it that supposed christians as functionality cannot do something as simple as READING? Is that so hard? He might want to reread and check up on that. " He says that what I said is wrong. So he is saying that I DID provide 50 reasons why God would not use text. However, Reader, We both know this is not true, As he said this multiple times in his previous arguments. "Oh and btw, Missmedic who truly has a gift for words came up with stunning reasoning as to the why. It is irrefutable. " This is what missmedic said: "The bible imparts information not knowledge. The bible does not allow you to know god, It merely allows you to believe that you know god. A perfect god would not use information. A perfect god would give us knowledge. God can tell us anything we need to know, And if there are things we need to know, A perfectly good-god would tell us directly. Therefore evangelism is pointless, Merely a social exercise that feeds the ego of the evangelists. God doesn't need prophets such as Jesus, Muhammad, Or magical tricks such as the Resurrection, To tell the world what it wants the world to know. If it is good for us to know something, God would tell everyone instantly and clearly, Not via 3rd-party magical tricks and public relations stunts. " The reason God does not do this is because then, Everyone would be forced to obey God and do what he says. However, He wants us to have free will, So he gives us the option to choose Christianity or not, And he gives us both the Bible, Nature itself, And Jesus as proof of his existence. My opponent says this was irrefutable, Yet I just refuted it! Funny. "Sure I can. Its my debate. Its not yours. You do not make the rules. "Second, I did answer the questions. " Actually you didn't. " Well my opponent did not end the debate like he said he would, So obivously he cannot. Then he says that I didn't answer the questions, Even though he literally just said that I did answer the questions. And he says that I have contradictions? "Understandable. NP. I get that. Then what do you do? You take 2 or 3 at a time and you respond to them. Or even 1, Wow. " This is in response to when I said that I would not respond to the videos because I did not have the time to do so. I specifically stated that if he were to provide a synopsis of each one, I would, But until he does that, I cannot waste my time. "AND you still have to prove that christ was the true savior in which case you have not done. Everything was pointed out to you as christ being false, " This debate is not about whether Christ was the true savior or not, So I do not have to prove that. Instead, Reader, I am focusing on the actual debate topic. I already responded to everything he said after that. "More added stuff" You know what? Suppose that there was someone who murdered his entire family, Chopped them up, Put them into an oil well, Got caught as just recently happened. . . He then later as his defense stated that he found christ. What do you think would happen to this person? Do you think that in any court in this country would ---ever--- let him go free? Oh but wait, YOU and your ridiculous truly childish brainwashed beliefs thinks so. " He says that me and my fellow Christians think that criminals deserve to go free because they found Christ. This is NOT TRUE. Criminals deserve to receive their punishment, Whether they are Christians or not. "You are forced to if you believe in your god. I believe in love, Harmony, Care, Kindness, Peace. You are totally incapable of it as is your god. " This is coming from the same guy who claimed to have the right to "belittle, Dehumanize, And humiliate" me, Simply because of my beliefs. Readers, He does not believe that I am being forced to believe in God. If he did, Instead of insulting me, He would be trying to save me from the evil people holding a gun to my head. But he continues to insult me, So this is not true. Reader, I have responded to the best of my ability. Only one more round of this my opponent's gibberish to go! I hope you will continue to read and vote for who you think won. And to backwardseden: backwardseden, Let's face the truth here. You are bigoted towards Christians, And nothing I can say will change that (unfortunately), And nothing you can say will change my mind or the mind of any other committed Christian who comes across your arguments. You don't care so much that you copied arguments from past debates! (And yes, I read some of your past debates). I pray for you and hope that you eventually learn to not hate Christians, Even if you never agree with us. *end* Thank you reader!