Does God exist

I seek refuge with Allah (swt) from Satan the Rejected, In the name of Allah (swt) the Most gracious Most Mercifull May Peace and Blessings of Allah (swt) be upon you all "Your Origin of the Universe argument is concise with what humanity has observed over the course of a short relative time in our stay in the universe, but what humanity has seen as opposed to the increasing knowledge of the universe is not much, thus, it is more reasonable to address this argument with ignorance; That it is most logical to say "I don't know whether or not the Universe has a cause or not a cause." However that does not mean we will remain ignorant. Our knowledge will change and will be subject to the information and data presented to us. If it changes, or if new data be recognized, our beliefs will be shaped accordingly." Well current data shows that the universe had a beginning, and that has been proved by the Cosmic Background Radiation, that a Big Bang happened If the universe had a beginning it had to have a cause, because everything that has a beginning has a cause Science may not be able to go back before the Big Bang but logic does. I already have shown that the universe can't be infinite, because infinity can't exist in the material world because what is infinity minus three? It leads to self contradictory answers Therefore there are only three explanations to the origin of the universe, they are; the universe came from nothing, it created itself, or it was created Only one of those explanations is not self contradictory and makes sense, and that is the universe had a Creator It is unreasonable to say that, "we don't know if the universe had a cause," because logic tells us that it did have a cause, and we have to deal with that because there is no alternative explanation, making God highly possible and highly probable to exist "Also, if it were the case that the Universe has a cause, many abstract objects can be the cause of it. We can be in a computer simulation, or the universe is caused by an abstract idea that is omnipotent but not conscious and identifiable like a single object like God is." What ever created the universe, had to have the will to create the universe, therefore it has to be intelligent, and if we are living in a computer simulation, who created the computer simulation? Was it aliens or robots like in The Matrix movies? If so they too would require a creator since they are finite beings and God alone is infinite. The Creator of the universe must be infinite (So it too wouldn't require and explantion) He would have to be immaterial (so He can be infinite) and He would have to be intelligent (so He could be smart enough to create a universe. "Furthermore, if it also were the case that one would propose that they were so intelligible of the Universe enough to give credit to an abstract idea to a God, it would their burden to absolutely, demonstrably, and deductively prove this to us. Otherwise, It would be unreasonable for anyone to believe you, and rightfully so." I have already deductively proven that Creator of the universe has to be eternal, immaterial, and intelligent "We could be in a computer simulation or we could've been created by God, but we cannot absolutely know for sure. However, to believe that we were created by God is also reasonable enough to believe that we are in a Computer simulation; They're both unreasonable." Who created the simulation? Why are they both unreasonable? Where did the universe come from? Why is there something rather than nothing? "To address the fine tuning argument, If one finds it reasonable enough to believe that because of such specificity in the requirements of life, so a God must have done it, than it is also reasonable enough to believe that because of such specificity in the requirements of life, we must be in a omnipotent computer simulation." Again who created the computer simulation? "Before I address more of these arguments, I'd like to express how your arguments are founded upon your first claim, that 'since the universe has a cause, therefore there must be a creator' which I found to be fallible because a cause does not necessarily mean a conscious, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent like a God is, thus your subsequent arguments are also fallible." I already proved the Creator has to be eternal, Transcendent, and intelligent just like God is "It is true, we are animals, but even animals do have their own moral principles. Why does a mother bear care for her young? Why do wolves hunt in packs? Why don't wolves eat each other? What is ordering them to behave the way they do? It seems to me that our search for why we feel so morally obligated to one another does actually stem from nature than it does from outside this physical realm." The animals hunt in packs and care for their young to survive as a species, but they rely on instinct, they don't have free will and the consciousness we do. Why should I care about the survival of my species when I know we are all going to die, Why can't I go around killing people, when I could get away with it? If there is no God or final Judgement, there are no rules, and the rules of nature don't apply to us either because we have free will, so I could go around killing people and get away with it, but I can't because there is a God and a final judgement "We have been able to create amino acids, the natural building blocks of life, under primordial earth-like conditions, and we have found meteors and asteroids containing amino acids. You're right Evolution cannot answer this, as abiogenises and evolution are two separate subjects. Abiogenises reflects upon how life began whereas Evolution explains how life evolves." Yes we have been able to create a few left handed and right handed amino acids, but proteins must be made up of only left handed amino acids, also proteins are way more complex than amino acids, as a house is to a brick, we have yet to create proteins or even a single cell, "the chances of a cell assembling itself is like a tornado sweeping through a junk yard and creating an airplane," Fred Hoyle also the if life could create itself why can't life create itself now? Abiogenesis has no proof but biogenesis does. "The Quranic Argument, that is not a solid argument that God exists. If I create a new genre of music that is a perfect mixture of classical and new age, and people deemed it beautiful, does it then mean that there is a God? Quite fallacious to assume the existence of a God due to the complexity of literature, don't you think?" I am not referring to the Quran's beauty I am referring to its complex form and structure, and it is both prose and poetry while all other forms of arabic liturature are either one of the two Muhammad (saw) was not a poet and he was illiterate, how could he come up with the Quran? I also gave a list of people who tried to create a chapter like the Quran, they all failed, why is that? Con did not address that, Con also did not address the scientific miracles of the quran such as the Big Bang Theory (21:30) Con also did not address the Transcendental Argument This also was not a rebuttal round Con was supposed to make his own opening arguments, Con did not follow the format of this debate, but it's ok, in the next section he will have to make another rebuttal of his rebuttal "I'd like to express once more that all the arguments given were not deductible evidence that a God exists. They were not demonstrable and absolute like a science experiment in University would be, and therefore truly unreasonable to believe such a case." The arguments were deductible evidence that a God exists as I have shown, and the Quranic argument has been demonstrated in many universities and by a number of scholars, and is absolute, there for it is reasonable to believe in such a case Jazakallah