Cyber bullying isn't really that big of an issue

TO THE VOTERS.I have very little to add. I feel like I offered good reasons why Cyberbullying is a large issue, and my opponent has not sufficiently negated those reasons. I have stopped asking for conduct because a conduct vote at this point is a nightmare to explain. So I would simply ask for a fair assessment of how well I did on my arguments and sources. That being said.TO MY OPPONENT.You may not create new responses during round 5. To do so would be to forfeit the debate over a rules violation. You agreed at the beginning of this debate to my clause that this be a 4 round debate (you agreed in the comments before I accepted the challenge, when I was allowed to request rule changes). As such I expect you to honor this. If you do not, you forfeit.Also, because you never made a rule stating that arguments could be made in the comment section, all arguments in the comment section cannot be used to vote on the debate. DDO has a policy that comments are comments, and arguments are arguments unless the debaters agree otherwise. Because we never agreed to this, your comment arguments are not valid to a vote.RESPONSES."I believe we have some MAJOR points to go over"We do not."Well there are reasons that I have bemoaned you of your calls for conduct.But for the sake of word space, I'll just post it in the comment section."So I guess those reasons will never be known. Comments are comments."You want to know why I didn't really put many resources. It's because I myself have experienced cyber bullying. Experience is like your own source of resources. I used experience combined with logic to come up with my answer."I am sorry that you have had to experience such a terrible thing. According to logic, however, your experience is not the only evidence that is valid. Evidence on a large scale is also required to make the logic stronger. Let me present two examples to illustrate this. If you are fighting a war with an alien enemy to humanity, your personal experience up until then is the only valid evidence on how to fight the enemy. However, if you are fighting a war against the resurrected Roman Empire and wish to know the best battle strategy, and say you have a little personal experience (its year 3 of the war) you would still need to combine your current experience with past history to come up with the most effective strategy. The second scenario is the type of situation we as a society face with Cyberbullying. Many people have experience, and we also have facts based on those experiences. So one persons individual experience counts for less than 500,000 individuals personal experiences. Hence, my argument on evidence still stands."Also, I never once saw you even mention the UK. I scrolled through the previous debates of yours and never once saw you mention the UK. Once again, the con is providing us with false information."Evidently you do not read. Round 1, point 2, paragraph 1."Your right it's not my call, BECAUSE THE CALL HAS ALREADY BEEN MADE. People everywhere agree that little children shouldn't use the internet."If you say everywhere, you need facts."Remember the environment example?"I do, I remember it was a good example with no facts to support it."-I just wanted to point out that other than the fact that the con says I don't have enough evidence to support my claims, it doesn't seem he really is putting up much of an argument for this round. For the most part that is."Whatever."But the con didn't say what the results where."*were, and yes I did. The quote below it that is bolded is the unanimous result of the three authors of the study. Also do not nitpick my study if you did not bring up your own. That is playing defense with no offense."I would also like to add that this survey was done in 2005/2006. Back them social media wasn't a very popular thing and there weren't many cyber bullies."Where are the facts."I actually think of this as a good thing because in traditional bullying, you can actually both emotionally and physically injured."True, but didn't you also agree you could ignore bullying easier face-to-face because you failed to respond to that argument during round 4? So I don't see how traditional bullying is a) good, and b) worse than Cyberbullying. I'm arguing both are equally terrible, but is easier to ignore. I guess you are trying to put words in my mouth."Plus, in traditional bullying, you actually know who's bullying you, making the bullying have more of an effect. But in cyber bullying, you don't know who's bullying you, making it have less of an effect."What effect are you even talking about."BUT you can tell your local police about it since they can actually track were you live via IP address."But can they track the cyberbully's IP? Because if not the Police are just spying on you without being able to help, which is pretty dumb."I fail to see how this honestly is supposed to prove your point more."Cyberbully victims have it worse than real life bully victims. That was the point and I'm sure when put that way, you understand why it helps me more."I also just want to add that if you really think that my information has no real evidence, then you can literally just search my information on the internet."You have evidently not read the debate guide for DDO. VOTERS. For this I ask for a loss of sources. My opponent blatantly admits that they do not wish to take the time to show us where their information comes from. This is laziness, and should be punished accordingly."Voters can do this as well."Well they are not supposed to ok? Remember that for the future. We are supposed to provide the info. Not the voters. If you let them fill the gaps, you let their bias possibly be introduced into their judgement, resulting in bad feedback. Also they are already writing you an RFD. So do them a favor and make that easier."Wow dude seriously chill out. There's a reason why I put a winky face on that statement. It was because it was meant to be taken as a joke."Well Natsu, I mean this in all seriousness. I did not come to debate this topic with you, in order to be the subject of jokes. So I am sorely disappointed by your behavior."Also I want you to read another response you yourself wrote in the comment section."See above but this response doesn't count. It's a comment. Also I apologize for making it, it was immature and wrong of me."I'm pretty sure a synopsis doesn't really matter in this situation as long as you prove the point."It does matter. It lets us know how you want us to perceive the evidence you have presented. Remember all of us have a unique perspective. Why not share yours? I have wanted to know it this whole debate, which is why I have continued to debate you."Also once again the con is counter arguing the most useless thinks so that it could appear to the voters that he has convincing arguments."Well until you fully rebut my arguments, I actually do have convincing arguments."I'll be immediately right after that post my other points in the comment section. So make sure to watch out for those."Once again, they do not count.I want to congratulate my opponent on a well fought debate. I have been enlightened some, and hope that we could maybe debate in the future.I will be posting that I extend all my current arguments in Round 5, true to my promise at the beginning. I will not add new responses. I would ask my opponent to do likewise.-42