College Football D-I should have a Play-off System

So, you say that the people who run D-I have the opportunity to have more fairness, better football, and more profit? Then why don't they have this yet? They must obviously have a reason. Perhaps they can't have a play-off system. They might be locked into a contract. They might not have enough time. They might be unable to afford it. I don't know. But they do. They might be unable to do a lot of things. Perhaps they don't want to have a play-off system. They might like the current system better. They might have more profits under the BCS. They might appreciate the fan excitement from voting. They might want their students to study for finals rather than watch football. I don't know. But they do. They might want a lot of things. However, there must be a reason why they have the current system they have, as opposed to a new one. If play-off systems were so beneficial and viable, as you claim, then College Football D-I would already have one. But they don't. They either can't do it, or they don't want to do it. Obviously, they know more about this stuff than you do. But they shouldn't have something that they can't have. But they shouldn't have something that they don't want to have, when they want something else instead. Therefore, College Football D-I should not have a play-off system. America is a capitalistic country. It runs on capitalism. People shouldn't have something forced upon them by the fans that lowers this profit. College football is already unprofitable, and is paid for by the American taxpayers. Any money they save by using the BCS actually keeps more money from being taken from the rest of America. Obviously, either they don't want to have a play-off system, or they can't have a play-off system. Therefore, they shouldn't have a play-off system. I will now address my opponent's attacks. "When everyone at every level, everywhere is competing in a play-off what's stopping D-I college football? " Nothing's stopping them. They just decided to make a different choice. It's not nice to make fun of things because they're different. The plan: let College Football D-I have whatever system they choose, because it is their choice, not yours. Their choice is BCS. Therefore, College Football D-I should have a Bowl Championship Series system, and not a play-off system. The arguments involving the "outdated bowl system" and a season that is "TOOOOOO Long" can apply to both a play-off system and a Bowl Championship Series system. There is then an argument about the fairness of the BCS, and how it is rigged for the teams that get more votes. The solution is simple: remove the polls. Let the teams have to work hard in the season to make it to the finals. "Quite simply their is only one solution. " There are two: play-off and BCS. "College football must change over to a play-off system. " No, they can do what they like. "If they want to keep their credibility, or even pretend they are a 'real' sport. " Apparently, in my opponent's mind, they don't. However, that doesn't matter. "Then prove it, what are they scared of? " They aren't scared of anything. They just want more money so that they can have better colleges. "In America we have a system, one system to determine the champion, the best, and that system is a play-off. " It may be the most accurate, but it's not the cheapest, and it's not the most convenient. The BCS is more efficient due to its needing less time, money, and effort. In conclusion, due to an irrefutable syllogism of pure logic, College Football D-I should not have a play-off system.