The Personal God Does Not Exist

I will make this explicitly clear now, this debate is not about the existence of god or of multiple gods. But instead this a debate about a the existence of a personal god. A personal god which intervenes in human affairs. The resolution refers to does the personal god exist in the current point in time(not has a personal god ever existed). For the sake of my opponent(who is a Christian) I will be arguing against the personal god we see in the Abrahamic religions. The following reasons are why the personal god does not exist:1. The Personal God came into existence long after human beings came into existence. The exact date of a monotheistic personal god came into existence in 14th century BC under the Egyptian Pharoah Akehnaten[1]. Yet it is common knowledge among scientists that human beings have existed for over a 100 millenia at the very least. The concept of a personal god was asserted by one individual after this long period of time. So where was the personal god previously? We are lead to believe he was not personal previously at all. Why else would he not let anyone know of his existence? [1]. http://www.evidenceforchristianity.org...2.The Personal God has never asserted its' own existence. The Personal God has only came into existence when a human being has chosen to written about such a figure. Yet a mouse can raid a household cabinet for food. A dog can go down the street and urinate on someone's lawn. A bear can maul a human being without hesitation. All of these creatures can act without a human being's permission but a personal god only exists when a human has decided to write about. If he is personal wouldn't he be able to interact as a live creature? I would so in the Abrahamic religions he does not. [2]The Bible(KJV version)3. The Personal God is an inanimate creature and not personal. As I said above the Personal God has never spoken for itself so he must be silent and observant. Human beings have only spoken for such an entity. So how can he be personal?4. Human beings are not rational creatures but rationalizing creatures. As I said above in Point #2, the Personal God does not assert it's own existence. So we must examine human beings because they exclusively assert such an entity exists. First, let us understand the basic tenants of which human beings asserts and defines. The human being calls the organized noise he/she is capable of making a “language. ”The human being calls the restraint of his own “behavior” “morals. ” Even the names that human beings call themselves and others is exclusively asserted by the human being alone. Then the human being turns around with his vast amount of intelligence to claim what he defined is an absolute for other human beings to obey. If a personal god exists why would he be bound to a far inferior creature who must define his own existence. If human beings have defined their own existence they have also defined the existence of a personal god as well considering they must speak for said entity. Therefore the personal god can not exist because human beings must define its' existence. If human beings have to define the personal god, it is not a personal god.6. Human beings fail to communicate with each other effectively. Human beings who speak the same language struggle to communicate from the most complex issues to the simplest. For example,one may be discussing from an emotional standpoint while another may be speaking from a pragmatic standpoint. These two may disagree violently because they fail to understand the other sides line of reasoning. Yet human beings would struggle even more so to communicate with another human being speaking a different language. Then a human being has to observe animals in order to communicate even reasonably. So how can human beings communicate with a creature like a personal god of vast superiority? Human beings often fail to even understand their own neighbors who speak the same language so of course they would be incapable of communicating with a superior creature.7. The Personal God does not intervene or no longer intervenes. The Personal God if such an entity existed in the past no longer intervenes. For example,the God we see in the Old Testament in the Bible has failed to aid the Jews during the Holocaust or the Spanish Inquisition. This God has decided to stop acting in their defense or decided he does not like Jews anymore.8. If a god or multiple gods exist they are not personal. Instead I would argue that if a god or multiple gods exist they are passive in nature. If such a god exists he has given his message through human beings as we allegedly see in the Abrahamic religions. So he can not be personal if he is utilizing human beings to spread his message. Even in the Abrahamic religions the God never acts himself but acts through a prophet. If these events in the Bible happened under the order of a god,the god must be impersonal not personal.