Gun Bans

I thank my oppnent for 'TRYING' to disapprove my logic.It seems sir, you did not understand the first point i mentioned, well... i'll clear it first.I said Would you like to count yourself among the many others who have no concience(the killers etc...)! Well the basic gist of using this phrase was to enlighten the fact that, would your Conscience allow you to carry a weapon capable of killing a living person,respective of the fact that you can kill a person in self defence.What you,sir, are trying to defend is the fact that killing a person would'nt play on your mind(even after, you are doing it to save yourself). Secondly..you mentioned the fact that "Guns don't kill people, people kill people"................. Well' are you trying to portray the fact that guns are people friendly!!!!!!!!Sir if this is the view you are trying to portray then sir, look closely what guns are doing all around you....the statement you later provided in your defense that "The gun banns presented in Washington DC "Murder Capital of the USA" haven't reduced violent crimes. According to http://en.wikipedia.org... i agree with the fact that crimes haven't reduced because of the fact that they have increased.Accordind to http://archives.cnn.com... WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Six in ten Americans believe that laws covering the sale of firearms should be more stringent than they are now, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Wednesday. Would you generally favor or oppose a law that would hold parents legally responsible if their children commit crimes with the parents' guns? Favor69% Oppose24% No opinion7% Now moving on you said..... The ability to use the gun reduces the criminals ability to assault you.Here too sir you fail to see the major glich the ability of the criminals to assault you is decreased but not nullified fully..you can't say whether the attacker won't instigate you into shooting first in which case ,my dear The defense would fail if a defendant deliberately killed a petty thief who did not appear to be a physical threat. Likewise, when an assailant ceases to be a threat (e.g. by being tackled and restrained, surrendering, or fleeing), the defense will fail if the defending party presses on to attack. A somewhat less obvious application of this rule is that admitting the use of deadly force in an attempt to disable rather than kill the assailant can be construed as evidence that the defendant wasn't yet in enough danger to justify lethal force in the first place. For example, in the U.S. state of California a defendant can be convicted of manslaughter but not murder when imperfect self-defense applies.[2] [3] The doctrine of imperfect self-defense recognizes a defendant's honest but unreasonable belief that deadly force is necessary. An appellate court in Kansas held that "Imperfect self defense is an intentional killing committed with an unreasonable but honest belief that circumstances justified deadly force."[4] Another court, in Maryland, held that: When evidence is presented showing the defendant's subjective belief that the use of force was necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm, the defendant is entitled to a proper instruction on imperfect self defense....The theory underlying the doctrine is that when a defendant uses deadly force with an honest but unreasonable belief that it is necessary to defend himself, the element of malice, necessary for a murder conviction, is lacking. —State v. Faulkner, 483 A.2d 759,769 (Md. 1984) [5] As regarding your third point i could'nt understand it... But in your fourth statement you jackhammer the fact of not knowing the reason for the assault,Iagree on that but don't you think they have got a family to support..They are following unlawful means but only with a sole purpose to live in a world where people like yousir,(plse no offense)deprive them many times of their rights. Thus my opponent has used reasons to justify the uprising crimes(homicide etc.) His nearly every reason has been countered with a logical one.... I hope he has reasons logical enough to support his views in the next round.....Adios amigo!!!!