A Discourse on Evolution (Pro) Vs Creationism (Con)

I would like to apologize for the delay in writing this. I have some real world obligations so my intro is shorter than planned, but I hope it still gets my point across. Just to get this out of the way early I know that evolutionists who don't believe in God like to say that I can't prove the existence of God, but at the same time they can't prove that he doesn't exist. The way to "prove" God's existence then would be to see how accurate his book is. If God wrote it, we should expect it to be scientifically accurate. The greatest proof that I see of God is the impossibility of life without him, the lack of evidence for macroevolution, and the evidence of a young earth that supports the Bible. Evidence of a Young Earth: 1. If our galaxy was as old as evolutionists say it is, we shouldn't have comets. The lifespan of a comet is only a few thousand years, any longer and it melts. How does our solar system have comets if evolutionists claim it's 4.6 million years old? [1] 2. Symbiosis. I've heard the arguments on both sides. Some creationists say that symbiotic relation could not have evolved on their own, and evolutionists counter by saying yes they can. Here's the real question. Is there evidence? I know that evolutionists don't like when I say God could do this and God could do that, but don't actually give any evidence; however, they do the same thing. Yes, if the theory of evolution were true symbiotic relationships could evolve, but I need evidence. For example is there any evidence of the termites ever lived without their symbiotic protozoa? If evolution were true the earlier forms of termites would have evolved without these Protozoa, but we see no evidence of this. Instead scientists found "100 million year old amber" with termites in them that were still symbiotic. Where's the evidence that these creatures could have evolved without each other? [2] 3. Faint Sun Paradox Evolutionists claim that the Sun is about 4.54 billion years old. If this is true that means the sun has used up about half of its life and is brighter than it was a couple of million years ago. Evolutionists say that life appeared about 3.8 billion years ago. There is something known as the faint young sun paradox, if the sun is 4.45 billion years old the temperature of the earth would be below freezing. Not only does this contradict evolutionist's theories that the earth's temperature was about the same throughout time, but it would also freeze the life-forms on earth. [3] 4. Rock Layers Folded If layers of strata were millions of years old, how are many layers folded? Rock will crack when pressure is applied when it had hardened. The only way for rock layers to bend is if they are bent while still soft. This indicates that the layers did not take millions or billions of years to form and that they were laid down at the same time. [4] 5. Living Fossils What are the chances of all these animals going millions of years without being fossilized. Talk about stretching your imagination. I know that it is possible, but it does not seem very likely. I'm sure that someone will eventually make up theories to counter my arguments as well as other creationists arguments, but they are usually just unproven theories. What I use are facts, things we can observe and test. Evolutionists believe in things that we've never even seen or tested. Creationists don't have to use as much imagination as evolutionists do to fit science into their worldview. Thank you. [1]. http://creation.com... [2]. http://webprojects.oit.ncsu.edu... . https://www.sciencedaily.com... [3]. http://www.space.com... . https://answersingenesis.org... . http://www.bbc.co.uk... [4]. https://en.wikipedia.org...(geology) . https://answersingenesis.org... [5]. https://answersingenesis.org...