On balance, Anarchism is More Humanitarian than State Planning

Every broad argument will be tagged with a letter/number. Elucidation: D1) On balance: Keep the framework reasonable. Ignore the possibility that aliens could invade and destroy every society beginning with consonants. Employ ceteris parabis assumptions. D2) Anarchism: The lack of aggressive monopoly. In this conversation, aggression is distinct from coercion according to the Libertarian ethic. The forceful defense of self ownership and peaceful homesteading is "coercion", not "aggression". Attacking innocent people with the intent to manipulate them into a social arrangement moves the affected group out of anarchism. D3) More: The pro/con may secure different elements of humanitarianism. It is up to them to show their share is more important. D4) Humanitarian: Take your pick. Better productivity, respect for rights, quality of life, social stability. D5) State Planning: Any non-anarchical arrangement. Familiar examples include democracy, monarchy, slave labor. States are not necessarily territorial monopolies, nor must they fulfill any particular duties (security). States are characterized by their method of organization, namely aggression. Constructive: O1) Civilization does not come about by intellectual fiat. A successful society must harmonize the actions of participants. Different incentive structures lead to different, predictable ends. C1) Economic Productivity: Individuals in anarchy have the option to trade. Actors can pursue mutually beneficial arrangements, creating a division of labor and increasing production efficiency. Under trade, each individual's means become more expedient. This is an ongoing process with no logical end. C2a) Emergence of Rights: Given the desirability of trade, each individual would prefer the general security of person and labor. There is an incentive for each individual to cheat on these rules, appropriating another's fruits in the hopes that the structure of production will not be badly disrupted. In short, people in anarchy face a collective action problem. C2b) Overcoming the Collective Action Problem: A solution brings with it the enormous benefit of trade. In short, there is an incentive inherent in anarchy to overcome this problem and establish the right of persons to labor peacefully. O3) Some groups of humans may find the solution easily if aided by intelligence, personal morality, and low communication costs. Others may find it more difficult and be unable to establish any lengthy periods of prosperity. I still claim it as the best choice among many. Utopia is not an option. C3) Moral Superiority: The incentives of anarchism lead away from aggression and warfare. I will not bother to develop a complex moral theory, but a quick survey of possible moral theories shines favorably on the right to self ownership. C4) Sustainability: Free trade is self reinforcing because it creates a dependence on the libertarian rights of others. Societies may employ a monetary pricing system, by which accounting emerges. The price of goods and services transmits information between consumers, merchants, and producers. Prices incentivize lasting economic use of resources. Closing: The arguments against state planning are too many to mention. I will bring them up as my opponent's constructive warrants.