Why is your religion the right one (I prefer to argue Christianity but anything goes here)

To start, I would like to apologize for my typing errors in the previous argument. Now, I would like to address Con's statement that religion is external in the form of written text, such as the Koran and the Bible. These texts are not religion itself. They did not create the rules that are within them. These texts are simply external representations of one's internal faith. These works of text are based upon an idea that a person developed through belief of a deity or lifestyle. Again, these are texts of the religions, not the religions themselves. Religion is not a tangible thing, it is only an idea that mankind has developed to interpret reality through. Secondly, while I do accept that many religions promise an afterlife, it is a common trend that people do not focus intently on their afterlife until their current life hits a breaking point of despair. As I stated in my last argument, "...find deep devotion to their faith..." This is not the same as implying that people only follow a religion after this despair, but they find their deeper meaning about it and follow it to heart. This is common in people with near-death experiences. After realizing their morality, people tend to find comfort within a deity or lifestyle that will help them ensure that their after-life will be desirable. Con again approaches the topic of written word of religion. As I stated earlier, this is just a representation of ideas. They are ideas that were developed and put into practice, written down to aid in effectively conveying their message. As Con stated, many people do not receive the signs that they desire. This again has to do with the psychological effects of religion. If someone is doubting their religion to the point of calling out directly for a sign, the brain will be looking for a sign instead of creating one. The opposite is true for a devoted man who has hit "rock bottom." His devotion to faith creates his reality of this being watching over him. While it is themselves taking over scientifically, their reality perceives it as their faith showing them hope and chance. Con's statement on how religious people aren't proactive in changing their lives is barely relevant given the fact that we are discussing religion itself, not followers of religion. When you look at the ideology of many religions, you will find that it is common that the path to salvation involves bettering yourselves and giving back to the people around you. Con also mentions the idea of fearing one's deity. The idea of fearing a deity is commonly identical to the healthy fear of an officer. It is more of recognizing their authority and power, and knowing that they are above you. Again, Con brings up the teachings of followers of these religions, when in fact many religions are based upon the idea of peaceful coexistence. The mention of conversion is again, a matter of the followers. In fact, in Christianity forcing conversion is against some of the primary principles. Many religions simply ask that followers spread their religion by making it available to others, and spreading knowledge within the parameters of respecting their differences. My argument that faith is an internal idea that molds a person's behavior and even perception of reality still stands to defend that every religion is the right one.