Biblical Creation or Creationism is false

Than you for accepting! I suppose to start I will address the issue of time. When working through the ages of the figures of the Bible the conclusion is that according to the Bible the earth was made, if I remember correctly, almost exactly 6000 years ago. This claim is obviously problematic because it contradicts just about everything we know of geology such as how long it takes for layers to form. Sources I will provide at the bottom but it is safe to say none of the mountains, canyons or continents took less that 6000 years to form and I challenge my opponent to find a published. peer reviewed scientific paper that says otherwise. Also we have dating methods (which I will provide) that can reliably tell us how old certain things are. Many of these dating methods reveal objects to be millions of years old. Now you can object to the accuracy of these but you will have to find a source that doesn't talk about the misapplication of carbon dating (such as the snail) and the similar error in other methods. You will have to find an actual scientific paper or source that shows a current dating method is unreliable when used in its intended frame. I dare say no such thing exists but if you really want to challenge the time scale you will have to find these not just something off "answers in genesis" or some rant about how carbon didn't date the snail or mt Everest right. Now onto the issue of the diversity of life. Now I will say there is no point in the CON trying to disprove evolution because if the theory (theory not being the English slang for a guess but actual scientific theory, if you don't know the difference I suggest you return to middle school) is not true then that will not make creationism correct. You do have to give some reason it is true. To continue. If the Ark was a real event then we would see (we can now even Ken Ham acknowledged this) that in every living species' past there would have been a bottle neck where only 2 individuals remained and all the bottle necks of 2 for every species would have been at the exact same time. If creationism is true this is something you will have found in the DNA, we would with out a doubt have this. Well first of all not every species has gone through a severe bottle neck in their history. Next the species that did have a bottle neck in their population did not have them at the exact same time, they would have all had this if creationism was true. Lastly no one of these bottle necks goes down to 2 individuals, not one when all of them should have this. Some of the smallest bottle necks go down to about 2000 to 10,000 individuals. In modern times we do have bottle necks of animals going down to less than 10 but lets be clear these are ones that happened within this century even due to hunting so not really useful huh? Now why is it that when these low populations should all have been at the same time, down to only 2 individuals and in every species we get not one of these criteria from even a single let alone all species? If the ark event happened we would see this there is no question we would not. Also please keep in mind this debate really isn't evolution vs creation it is about whether creationism is true or not so I again advise leaving that alone unless you really want to because again if one is false it does not make the other true. I think this is enough to chew on for now so here are some sources http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://juliamallen.com...