"Proving Catholicism to be teaching false doctrine, and thus a manmade church"

The bible is the only book inspired by God, and was divinely guided by God to say only what he wanted us to know, thus to use anything else would be man made, meaning uninspired. Noticed the noun "book" is singular, but references all that's in the book, called the bible, which happens to be a collection of 66 books contained in one book, called the bible. I hope this helps my opponent in understanding basic grammar. The word scripture or scriptures can be used in more than one way, such as referring to "this particular scripture" or "some scriptures need interpretation", again, a basic misunderstanding of proper use of grammar on my opponents part. My opponent compares his word " great " with God's word " perfect " in 2 Timothy 316-17King James Version (KJV) 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be "perfect", thoroughly furnished unto all good works, which one cannot improve on, although you can on great, by being perfect, I urge my opponent to look up the definitions of the two for future references as the proper definition of these two words. Again, my opponents interpretation of basic words such as "all" and "every" pertaining to the words in the scripture speaks for itself. 2 Timothy 3:16King James Version (KJV) 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: Whether the word all or every is used in this verse means exactly the same. All scripture, or every scripture means the same, if not, it would contradict the other words in this verse, such as, [inspiration of God], [ profitable for doctrine ], [for reproof], [for correction], and [ for instruction in righteousness] 1.All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 2.Every scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: If you notice in # 1 and # 2 there are no grammatical error, and no contradiction of scripture, My opponent contradicts himself by using 2 Pet 1:20-21 ... against personal interpretation, as the bible only has one interpretation, so why would anyone need a personal interpreter, such as a priest to tell them what the bible says, I submit, they wouldn't. 1.Yes Christ and Paul did command every Christian to drink of the communion cup in Matthew 26:26-28; 1 Corinthians 11:23-28. And Yes I know that two early popes condemned withholding the cup, (Pope Leo I [died 461 AD] and Pope Gelasius [died 496 Ad]; but in the 12th century the practice was begun, and formally approved by the Catholic Council of Constance in 1415 AD. Yes I know that in 1970 the pope restored the cup to the laity. More false doctrine of the Catholic church. 2.Was every living Christian in the church in Corinth called a saint? Yes. 3.Yes I know that in the Bible (1 Corinthians 1:2; Ephesians 1:1; Philippians 1:1; Romans 1:7) every Christian was a saint and every saint was a Christian. Yes I agree, the Bible uses the word saint as interchangeably synonymous with being a Christian, but the Roman Catholic church has the power to change the Bible, that's what they think, but they cannot change anything.. 4.Yes I know that in the apostolic church (1 Peter 2:5,9; Revelation 1:6; 5:10), every Christian was a priest and the two terms are used interchangeably synonymous with being a Christian, but the Roman Catholic church decided that only leaders should be called priests, again they add or subtract from the bible as they feel like it. 5.Yes I know that the Bible appears to teach that 1 Timothy 3:2-5 bishops must be married with believing children, but you can't even understand the Bible anyway, why do you ask? Just trust me because only Catholic priests can understand the Bible, that's what the Catholic church wants you to believe. 6.Yes I have read 1 Timothy 4:1-3, and is seems to condemn forbidding the marriage of Catholic priests, but the Pope decided that unmarried men are more holy than married men, and you wonder why there's so many child predators in the Catholic church. 7.Yes I know that Mark 1:30; 1 Corinthians 9:5 say that Peter had a wife 23 years after Christ died on the cross (53 AD), but Pope Gregory VII decided in 1079 AD from that time onward, that church leaders cannot marry, false doctrine at it's best. 8.Yes I know that sitting through a Latin Mass service can be very boring for many Catholics in the pews. And yes I know that 1 Corinthians 14:19 condemns conducting a church service in a language the average member does not understand, but the Pope decided that Latin sounds real holy and has both historical and mystical qualities, that's what makes the Catholic church a man made church.. 9.Yes I know the early church did not begin to celebrate Christmas until the 4th century. And yes I know that Galatians 4:10-11 condemns the keeping of such holy days not found in the Bible, but the church at Rome needed a way to convert the pagan worshippers of Mithra, the god of light... and it worked! His birth is what's important, and there's no date in the bible of his date of birth, again, false doctrine. 10.Yes I know that Acts 20:7 commands Christians to have weekly communion services and that the early church did not celebrate Easter as is done today, but having a yearly communion service was something later church leaders wanted to add to worship. Departing from the New Testament pattern shows why the Catholic church is nothing more than an evil against the truth. 11.Yes I know that the Roman Catholic church deleted the 2nd commandment (Exodus 20:4) in order to hid from the masses God's condemnation of bowing down and kissing images of Mary and Peter, but Mary revealed herself to us in a vision. Another disgrace towards God shown by the Catholics. 12.Yes I know that Jesus was baptized by full immersion in the Jordan River (Matthew 3:16), and that sprinkling was not officially approved until 1311 AD, but it sure is more convenient. Leaving the New Testament pattern again is seen here, as one has to be immersed to be saved, Acts 2;38, Mark 16;16 13.Yes I know that babies have no faith and cannot repent, and are therefor not really valid candidates for baptism (Mark 16:16; Acts 8:36-37; Acts 2:38). But the Pope invented the idea of where the faith and repentance that the infant lacks, is exchanged for the faith and repentance of a "God Parent". Yes I know none of this is in the Bible, but the Pope is the "holy see" and he must know what he is doing! That's right, it's not in the bible, and neither is original sin. 14.Yes I know Ezekiel 18:20 proves the doctrine of total hereditary depravity (inherited original sin) contradicts the Bible, but you cannot understand the Bible anyway, only the priest can correctly interpret it. That's what the Catholics want you to believe, but it's another false doctrine. 15.Yes I know that Matthew 18:2-3 teaches that children are better models of purity and conduct than adults, but the Pope teaches that infants are wicked defiled sinners condemned to hell until a Catholic priest baptizes them and removes the curse of original sin. Catholics need to put their faith in God, not in the pope 16.Yes I know Ephesians 3:4 plainly seems to say that when you read the Bible by yourself, you can have the same insight that the apostle Paul had into spiritual things, but we Catholic priests cannot teach all our false doctrines that contradict the Bible unless we convince you that you can't understand the Bible unless the priest helps you. How true, they don't want you to know the lies, so they can keep you enslaved by there false doctrine. 17.Yes I know that 1 Peter 3:15 teaches every Christian should be able to defend from the Bible what they believe, but isn't that what us Roman Catholic priests are supposed to do? Do you want to put us out of job and rob us of all our power and control? Yes, the Catholic church needs to be destroyed as a false religious entity. 18.Yes I know that human traditions that contradict the Bible are condemned in Mark 7:7-9, but all the doctrines that contradict the Bible which the Pope through up were revealed to him directly by Christ and therefore, although they contradict the Bible, they are divinely approved by Christ himself, false. 19.You really shouldn't be reading the Bible anyway. And while we are talking about it, what else do you want me to teach you about what the Bible says? Read the bible for yourself and stop believing the false doctrine of the Catholic church, your soul depends on it. My opponent needs to start answering some of the questions I asked of him in my earlier argument, as this is what a debates all about.