The 4th Dimension is imagination

1. "The true definition of dimension has to do with the minimum number of coordinates needed to specify any point within it. " source, YOU -lets start there. The 1st dimension requires one coordinate, The 2nd requires 2 and the 3rd requires 3. (Source, Common sense) And these are coordinates necessary to locating any given point on a plane. If time is the 4th dimension, How many coordinates in the dimension of time, Does it take to identify any given point? For example, Just a common sense non scientific study example. With only one coordinate to express a point on a 1-dimensional plane, Does it still not take time to observe said point? Is time still not a factor because it is not being considered? So even though the limitation of having one coordinate is present, Shouldn't the 1st dimension actually be two if time is its own coordinate? No its only 1 because (common sense dictates) time is just a concept present in all dimension. 2. "Are the senses not centered in the mind? " I argue that you are referring to the brain (source, Elementary anatomy), The physical form. I am referring to the metaphysical "mind. " There isn't much scientific evidence on how the mind works because we can't prove conceptions like emotion, We can only prove physiological responses associated with the mood. But the mood is still a mystery, Just like the mind. I argue that cracking that mystery will enhance perception, Or at least as we know it. -source, Common sense. 3. "I am observing my friend in my apartment right now and am aware of his consciousness. " - If you're going to belittle an argument, Don't misquote it. The picture you were attempting to paint is, "I was talking about my friend behind his back and out of no where he called me and said 'my ears are burning, I think someone is talking about me, " I argue that the friend who'e ears were burning, Was perceiving in a 4th dimension. You should be disturbed, I would be too if people around me were perceiving on a plane higher and I wasn't in on it. Or i would be disturbed if everyone had the same tools but others were using theirs in a way that let them accomplish things that I couldn't. In closing, Meditation, Prayer, Law of attraction etc, These concepts more so explain the 4th dimension than time. Calling time the 4th dimension to me is a cop out and does nothing to enhance the way we perceive reality. On the other hand, When we are able to perceive differently based on mood, Or intuition, We are getting a story more in depth that what we perceived on a xyz plane. For example, If i perceive malice in you, Where do i see? Specify with the coordinates necessary. . You can't because that perception needs another coordinate, One that takes the entire 3d plane, And stacks it. The cons argument is the same argument that is commonly made for time being the 4th dimension and as he states facts and quotes text, Though very thorough, He lacks originality in thought and fails to bring new ideas to support time being the 4th dimension. He even fails to create an argument but rather copy paste links for me to read his argument, In essence causing me to debate with myself lol. P. S. I will not site any data. My points stand on there own. If you choose to get caught up on semantics then debate with someone who prides themselves on reciting formulas and text. I pride myself on being able to understand the perspective of any concept regardless of how it is formed.