Evolution has been proven wrong in many different areas your tax money should not be paying for it

Ok well I will apologize to you Gear my first argument was weak I simply dug up information and used it I was low on time. Alright let me clarify this debate topic Mr. Gear The THEORY of evolution has been proven wrong in many different areas 1. As the moon rotates around the earth it is slowly moving away about 3 inches every year. So by multiplying 3 inches by the 4.1 billion years required for the evolution theory to take place you get 1,230,000,000,000 inches(19,412,878 miles) however at this time today the earth and the moon are only 250,000 miles apart your theory has a problem. According to the evolution time line the earth should cover that distance 77 times 2. I have had many debates (never on the internet) on this topic and no one has ever given me a rational answer to this question: How do we define right from wrong? 3. One of many questions left unanswered by evolution is how man's conscience could have developed. How could ideas of right and wrong (which seem to be firmly ingrained into every culture) have developed by evolutionary process? If we evolved, ideas of right and wrong must have also evolved with us. Therefore, a conscience, that is a knowledge of right and wrong, must have some intrinsic survival value. But does it? Search for the Truth This article is one of many found within Mr. Malone's excellent book, Search for the Truth. In a struggle for survival, will the existence of a conscience help or hinder one's survival? An evolving person without a conscience would be free to covet belongings, steal other possessions, and even kill another person without guilt. A man with a conscience is hesitating and soul searching. Where is the individual having the conscience? The conscience serves as a detriment to survival, not a mechanism which increases an individual's ability to survive. Unless the universe has been created by God who has established inherent values of right and wrong, it would seem there is no survival value to the development of a conscience. If the conscience did not evolve, then it must have always existed. What could be the source of that which always existed and defines good from evil? The question itself defines the characteristic of God. Almost all people of every culture seem to have an innate sense of right and wrong. There also seems to be universal guilt among humans and a desire to be free of this guilt. How could we be born with an innate sense of right and wrong? Maybe we feel guilty because we are…in reality…guilty. One can ignore their conscience. If this happens repeatedly, their conscience will tend to atrophy the same way an unused muscle will atrophy. In Biblical language, to ignore one's conscience is to allow his heart to become hardened. There are many influential voices today who believe the solution to our social problems is to deny that there is an absolute standard for (or even existence of) right or wrong. Thus, a person with little or no conscience is as welcome as one with a highly developed conscience. In such a society right and wrong exist only by what is most expedient for those in power. Nazi Germany was such a society. A society which denies the reality of an external source of conscience often becomes a hell on earth. Where does sacrificial love come into such a society? Why be sacrificial in a society which teaches any lifestyle is acceptable? The God of Christianity extols self sacrifice. This seems to be the opposite of what evolution would produce. The Bible is full of examples of loving sacrifices but nowhere can the concept of survival of the fittest be seen as a characteristic of God. To summarize, according to the evolutionary principle of survival of the fittest, a loving human with a conscience is at a great disadvantage and would be unlikely to have survived the evolutionary process. From a humanist viewpoint, attributes of the conscience (such as self sacrifice purely for the good of others) are weakness. Yet it is these very attributes which make us humans and not animals. No person has ever lived who has not violated his conscience in some way. Every person has fallen short of what God expects from us-obedience. So how do we make up for our disobedience to the One that put the standard in our soul? The Bible is very clear that we can never earn our way to heaven by trying to make up for our shortcomings. It is also clear that God has provided a means of forgiveness through the loving sacrifice of himself as payment for our sins. 4. Time = Amount / Rate Amount = Measured - Initial - Contamination Rate = Average Rate Over the Whole Time Search for the Truth This article is one of many found within Mr. Malone's excellent book, Search for the Truth. It is hard to open a newspaper, book, or magazine without finding some implication to the earth being billions of years old. Given the overwhelming barrage of these statements, it is understandable why so many people have trouble considering the possibility that the earth might be only thousands of years old. Yet there is an intriguing possibility that the earth may be much younger than 'billions of years'. Despite what people have been led to believe, there are no dating methods which give an absolute date for the formation of the earth. All dating methods are based on non-provable assumptions about some event in the past. Furthermore, there is a strong bias to reject any dating method which does not allow enough time for evolution to have happened. To understand the validity of any date, the reader must gain an understanding of how all dating methods work. The following illustration should help: Suppose you were up at 6:00 a.m. and happened to see a friend who lives in a nearby town. You observe that he is walking along at 2 miles an hour and you know that he lives 16 miles away. You can easily use the formula at the top of the illustration to calculate that your friend left home 8 hours earlier. You have just performed a dating method of how long your friend has been on the road. However, something doesn't make sense. Why would your friend be up all night walking? Although you used the correct formula, your assumptions may not have been correct. Perhaps your friend stayed with someone in town and woke up just minutes before for a morning stroll. In this case, you have used the 'Wrong Initial Amount' in your calculation. Perhaps he took a shortcut which cut 12 miles of his walk. In this case there was 'CONTAMINATION' of the total amount. Perhaps since you last saw your friend, he has taken up marathon running and average 8 miles and hour (only having slowed down just before you saw him). In this case you have used the wrong 'Average Rate'. The point is, wrong assumptions lead to wrong answers. In all dating methods the initial amount is an assumption, the estimate of contamination is an assumption, and the overall rate is an assumption. The only things which can be known for sure are the present amount and the present rate. 5. Homosexuality? how does that fit into the evolution plan? I am in full agreement with your statements above I am not debating weather things can evolve or not of course they can the bible tells us that species of animals evolved. Gen 1:20 "and God said "Let THE WATERS bring forth swarms of living creatures"...... Gen 1:24 And let THE EARTH bring forth living creatures of every kind." You have misunderstood my argument and have taken a naive stand on the argument. Of course species evolve, however the EVOLUTION theory that my tax dollars go to support is a contradicting foolish one. So far you have offered childish arguments that have absolutely nothing to do with this debate what so ever.