God Does Exist

Okay, I will now present my arguments for God's existence; 1. The Comsological Argument from Contingency 1. everything that exists has an explanation of it's existence, either in the neccesity of it's nature, or in an external cause- the universe would be a physical object, i.e all of space and matter. 2. if the universe has an explanation of it's existence, that explanation is God- since the explanation is outside of it (per 1), the cause must be immaterial, since it is outside space and time. 3. the universe exists- obviously the universe exists! 4. therefore that explanation of the universe's existence is God 2. The Kalam Cosmological argument 1. everything that begins to exist, has a cause- this is supported by the law of cause-and-effect, by the fact things don't come into being uncaused out of nothing, and the fact that this obviously does not happen to the material in our world as otherwise we would see tigers come into being in our living rooms. 2. the Universe began to exist- this is backed up by Guth-Borde-Villenkin Theorem [1], which shows scientifically that any universe that is on average expanding (like ours) must have had a beginning of it's existence a finite amount of time ago. This applies to the multiverse too, if it exists. 3. therefore, the Universe had a cause- this cause must be immaterial, atemporal, immensely powerful and personal because if it exists without time then it exists infinitely, but if a cause exists infinitely it's effect will have existed infinitely also, but the universe is not infinite. Therefore, the cause can only be a personal agent who could freely choose to create the universe. 3. The Teleological Argument From Fine-tuning This deals with a number of fine-tuned constants and quantities necessary for the existence of intelligent interactive life-forms like us. It turns out there are 50 quantities and constants which, if they were altered by a hairs-breadth in the initial conditions of the universe prior to the Big Bang, would have resulted in a non-intelligent life permitting universe. These could have come into existence in one of three ways. Either they came into existence as a consequence of the natural laws of the universe, chance, or else design. They could not have come about by natural laws since the natural laws only came into existence once the Big Bang happened. They could not have reasonably come into existence through chance either because the range of propbability of all these constants falling into place by chance is so tiny that all of these constants and quantities cannot reasonably be faced on a mathematical level. We may summarize the teleological argument thus far as follows; 1. the fine-tuning of the universe for intelligent life is due to either chance, necessity or design 2. it is not due to chance or necessity 3. therefore, it is due to design The moral argument for God The moral argument for God relies on the fact that there exist certain objective moral values and duties which we know to be binding on us- even if our society does not accept them! f we agree there are some things that are wrong regardless ofwhat people think, then we must agree there is some grounding for our morality. The best source of that biding morality, I wil argue, is God. Thus if objective moral values and duties exist, then God must exist. The argument goes like this; 1. if God does not exist, objective moral values and duties do not exist 2. but objective moral values and duties do exist 3. therefore, God exists I look forward to my opponents counters of these arguments, and his own arguments for why God doesn't exist. I thank him for his timely acceptance of this debate.