The decision to not indict Officer Darren Wilson was justifiably correct

Since I was never told that I could not, I am going to choose to make a rebuttal for both your second and third rounds. Second Round: "As the prosecution has Burden of Proof, he/she is required to prove to the judge that the accused is proven guilty "beyond reasonable doubt" and that the accused has reasonable evidence against him."Actually, if the case were to go to court, then the evidence would have to be beyond a reasonable doubt. However, a grand jury does not operate under this standard of proof. Instead, a prosecutor must show that there exists a case against the defendant. We are talking about a police officer, who should be trained to deal with unarmed suspects peacefully, killing an unarmed teenager, breaching protocol in several ways, and later stating that he has no remorse for what happened. In a fair universe where prosecutors that have serious levels of conflict of interest would not be chosen, Darren Wilson would have undoubtedly been indicted."When he does that, his left hand goes in a fist and goes to his side, his right one goes under his shirt in his waistband and he starts running at me."Um, what? I'm sorry, but did he just say that Mike Brown tucked one arm to the side and another in his pants? So, not only is this boy of similar height a "demon", "it", and "Hulk-Hogan", but he is also... a f*cking anime character? At this point Brown would have been shot several times, and yet this boy still posed a life threatening risk? This man is an officer of the law! What use are police officers if boys, not men, boys, that have been shot several times and is now 30 some feet away, can still pose a threat to his life. I don't buy the story. Nothing other than his hand was supposedly tucked into his shirt and Darren Wilson's testimony suggests that Brown actually made a run for him. And as for the forensic report? I could think of something else that would cause on arm to be outstretched and another to become possibly tucked into their shirt. Kneeling, with your arms up?I agree that first degree murder isn't on the table; there is nothing to suggest that this murder was planned beforehand. "Brown was called out to stop the attempted robbery conducted by Brown (4) and had no personal motive to murder Brown in anyway"So... Brown was called out to stop the robbery conducted... by Brown? And then Brown shot himself? I think you mean Wilson, but even that doesn't hold up, as the robbery had nothing to do with the murder. To quote from source 1, "In a separate press conference later in the day, chief Jackson said that officer Wilson had no knowledge of Brown as a suspect when he shot Brown.You say that this shooting couldn't be second degree murder because some bull crap about a heavy set 18 year old that didn't participate in sports posing a threat from at least 35 feet away, but before I prove this could very well be 2nd degree, let's see what that just means. To quote from source #2, "Second-degree murder is ordinarily defined as: 1) an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable "heat of passion"; or 2) a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life." I would argue that as this murder was not committed with a reasonable "heat of passion", that it would qualify for #1, but the second option is a definite fit. How, you ask? Darren Wilson didn't have a tazer (3).As a police officer, one would at least suspect that a days work could involve a physical altercation, so having the tools to best deal with such a predicament would also be expected. Let's see, which tools are best for dealing with physical altercations in which the least amount of people die? Would it be a gun or a tazer? The thing pretty much invented to kill people, or the device kind of created to deal with a situation in which someone's child doesn't end up in a casket. But he had a good reason for not having that, right? Well, according to Mr. Wilson, he didn't have a tazer because they don't feel comfortable. Well, I wonder how comfortable bullets feel, Mr. Wilson?Also, self defense is only valid when 1) you are in immediate danger (35 feet, buckaroo, to run away. There's also reason to believe Brown did run further than the 35 feet, as he was found somewhere around 150 feet away from the SUV [4]) and 2) when all other means have been exhausted. TAZER, ANYBODY?????Round 3: Darren Wilson stated that he didn't need medical treatment at all. Yes, the man who was just in a life threatening situation, said he didn't need medical treatment after said life threatening situation. And as it gave Wilson even more time to think, and as he rode with others, to coordinate, his story out.Okay, well no, doing what that man did was kind of like his job. He had the same info but I guess had either more intelligence to properly understand what was going on or maybe he was less corrupted. Who knows? You still stick with this rather odd idea that Mike Brown, seemingly channelling the devil spirits that run through his body, placed his hand in his jeans because he's just so much better at running like that. Oh, and I did that little exercise, and I am pretty sure the bullet would have entered my stomach if I was shot in the arm like that. You're also kind of putting a lot of faith into the testimony of Darren Wilson, kind of the man that would benefit from getting off with this. This doesn't mean he's lying, but he also called an unarmed black teen that has been shot a couple of times a "demon", so...Here's another source (again, source 5.) But I mean, seriously, you could just Google it. I'm not hiding the info; the Bar Association is calling BS on the entire grand jury. "After looking briefly on the Internet for this scenario, I find no sources stating this because without references this argument is invalid." Jesus, if I had to count how many times you have presented conjectured "plausible" account of this, I'd be here all day. But if you're goanna demand a source, the read source 6. "This is not a breach of protocol for police, cameras running out of battery does not change the evidence presented to the court as there are already pictures of the crime scene available on the Internet which can be used in court." Oh, because photos on the Internet have to be real, right? Like we're living in a post-photoshop world in which every photo on the Internet, especially by those untrained in taking reliable photos for a police investigation, can be used for said police investigation? Besides, protocol was breached. Just because someone makes up for your mistake, doesn't mean no mistake was made. This isn't a court case. This is a grand jury, where the standard of evidence is significantly reduced. My point in bringing up the statistic, was that not getting an indictment is so rare and so easy, that when an unarmed teenager is shot 30 feet away, and that of all things doesn't get an indictment? A black police officer recently got indicted for hitting a man with his baton, another great way to diffuse a situation in which someone doesn't die, and he got a federal charge (7). DARREN. WILSON. SHOT. SOMEBODY. Source:1. http://www.newsweek.com... 2. http://criminal.findlaw.com... 3. http://www.dailydot.com... 4. http://www.dailykos.com... 5. http://us7.campaign-archive1.com... 6. http://www.dailykos.com... 7. http://www.dailydot.com...