An atheist President would be okay

Ah, I apologize for not being specific. I am arguing for someone like an agnostic atheist or someone like Hemant Mehta, who has a blog here: http://www.patheos.com...; I agree, it is certainly a waste of time to argue whether a militant atheist (or a militant anything for that matter) would be a good President. And no, I welcome new arguments on anything I am debating.1. MoralityI am not going to argue how nothing is infinite, and that it's pretty much impossible to be omniscient, and how Bible verses contradict the claim of an all loving god, because that's a waste of time. Instead, I will address everything else.1A. The Bible This is by far not the world's view of the Christian holy book because, obviously, 1/3 of the world is Christian. I live under the assumption that the Bible was written by man and not inspired by a higher deity. There is morality we agree with in the Bible because it was written by man. If you need a god to tell you not to kill people, there's something wrong. Because of the time the Bible was written 2,000 years ago, of course there's going to be stuff we don't agree with.1B. TrustMy opponent asserts that we follow the things in the Bible because he is omniscient and all loving. Well, I'm asking a couple questions: What about the other 2/3 of the world that doesn't follow Christianity? Are they lost? Then my opponent asks a question: "Is it better to trust ourselves or our Creator?" There is something so wrong with that (in my opinion). So basically, you're pulling Pascal's Wager. You'd trust someone you don't even know exists more than yourself. Mind you, the person that you are is the person that you can trust more than anyone else. Also, how would our "creator" want our country to be run? Why does he care? And why the heck do we not have the right to govern ourselves without our so called "creator" stepping in and telling us this is wrong? I thought we had freewill. 1C. The Pledge"Having an atheist President goes against America's Pledge of Allegiance, which says 'One nation, under God...'" So suddenly the Pledge is law? Also, that very line in the Pledge is against the first amendment of the actual base of our government prohibits the mixture of church and state. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]"Though it is not stated directly, the idea of seperation of church and state is inside the first amendment. If you don't understand, Google it. The Pledge of Allegiance and the motto on our coins directly violate the first amendment. Here are some more things that are wrong with the Pledge: http://atheism.about.com...Feel free to criticize or address the points in the website. 2. Obama being atheistObama is not an atheist. According to:1. http://cathleenfalsani.com...2. http://www.christianitytoday.com...3. http://www.huffingtonpost.com...Since this turned out to be shorter than I'd intended, my opponent is welcome to post new arguments other than the ones I suggested, and with their permission (I don't want to bother you), I will either create a continued version of this debate and put the link in the comments, or put my last rebuttals and conclusion in the comments. If not, then you can post rebuttals and conclude your argument or just post your conclusion. Either way, it's your choice. If you choose to conclude, thanks for debating me. If not, thanks still. I enjoyed it.