Who is God??/

My opponent has leveled a rather serious accusation against the Catholic (and by extention the Protestant and Eastern Orthodox) Church. This is an hefty burden of proof as he is challening doctrine that has been largely unchallenged for nearly 1700 years, in favor of an understanding that began in 1870.Allow me to break this down into contentions.C1) OT Figures served a monotheistic God.C2) Jesus also serve a monothesitic God.C3) Catholocism creatd a false trinity in the various councils initiated by the Emperors of RomeC4) The Greeks refused to revert to a religion with a single God and therefore the Triity was created to appease their polytheistic leaningsC5) The translators used many wrong Greek words to English to fit their false council teachingsC6) The truth about God is present in the written words of Jesus and Paul in the BibleC7) 1 Corinthians says "there is one God" and therefore there is one GodC8) In John Jesus calls the Father the "only true God", therefore jesus is not GodC9) In Revelation 3:13 Jesus stresses that the Father is "my God" and therefore Jesus is not GodC10) Catholocism has altered God's word to create this false teachingUltimately my opponent's resolution is not "Who is God" but is "The doctrine of the Trinity is a false doctrine created by the Catholic Church by manipulation of the written word of God." As such, in order to secure victory he must prove the following points. As Con, all I must do is show that this burden of proof has not been fulfilled.A) The doctrine of the Trinity is a false doctrineB) This false doctrine was created by the Catholic ChurchC) The Catholic Church manipulated the written word of God to create this false TrinityIf he fails to prove any one of those points, he has failed fo fullfil his burden of proof and therefore loses this debate.RefutationRC1) UndisputedRC2) UndisputedRC3) This contention begs the question. He has not proven that the Trinity is false, and therefore cannot assert that Catholocism created a false trinity.RC4) This contention is rediculous, since the primary source of Christians outside of the first century were Greek and Roman. Furthermore, there is no evidence backing this and therefore the point is moot until substantiated. Furthermore, this kind of Pagan Polytheism was on the decline in the 1st century and was likely essentially dead by the 300s. [A]RC5) What credentials or evidence does my opponent have to make this claim. As he points out, most Greek words have several English equivalents, what grounds does my opponent have to determine which Greek word is "right" and which is wrong"RC6) UndisputedRC7) UndisputedRC8) The Doctrine of the Trinity does not prohibit Jesus from calling the Father the "only true God." The Doctrine of the Trinity states that the Father is God, The Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God and that all three Persons exist coeternally and coequally as distinct beings sharing one divine nature. To call the Father the "one true God" is to identify that the Person of the Father exists in the Nature of the One True God. Stating that the Father is in Nature the "one true God" does not preclude the Son nor the Spirit also being in Nature the "one true God."RC9) See RC9. This is what is called "Functional Subordination." It means that functionally or econmically, Jesus is subordinate to God but is not ontologically or existentially subordinate. The same would be true of the Holy Spirit. Consider this, am functionally my bosses subordniate. However, our Nature (Human) is identical. Am I somehow LESS human because I am functionlly subordinate to my boss? Absolutely not.RC10) The manuscript evidence for the historical veracity and consistency of the Bible is massive. Although there has been minor modifications from time to time, no modification has been proven that shows any substantial change to doctrine or meaning. My opponent has made this claim with no evidence and therefore it can be dismissed.As we can see my opponent has not satisifed any burden of proof what so ever.A) The doctrine of the Trinity is a false doctrine - Unproven B) This false doctrine was created by the Catholic Church - Unproven C) The Catholic Church manipulated the written word of God to create this false Trinity - UnprovenAt this point in the debate, Pro has not secured victory due to his lack of satisfying burden of proof.Footnotes[A] See Craig L. Blomberg's "Jesus and the Gospels: An Introduction and Survey, 2nd Edition", (Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2009), 30 for more