Debate.org is an awful website

To start off, you immediately said that the comment I made on my gender was irrelevant to the topic at hand. But that's exactly what I said about your McDonalds comment. No offense but it just seems as though you are taking my words and using them as your own. Which, just makes you look unintelligent and foolish. You then stated that I utterly failed at a rebuttal when I didn't. I got my points across and provided reasons to why I don't think Debate.org is an awful website. If anything, your arguments are flawed because you never stated why not having certain features or not having as many people was such an inconvenience. A little word of advice, unless you can tell me why these things are so bad, then it is just a pointless thing to bring up. That's exactly why I am correct in this debate. Your only stating your opinion. I understand that I am only stating my opinion, but at least I provide evidence to back up what I am saying. I don't equivocate on my opinions because I stand by them. You, however, contradict your own opinions with your actions and belittle people for making mistakes they never made. And another thing, you said that I said if I don't have a problem with a feature, you shouldn't either. But, once again your lack of ability to pay attention to the words you are reading will be your downfall. I actually said that 'I can manage without one, so MOST LIKELY you can too.' I never said that you should be able to use the website without one, or you shouldn't have trouble without a feature, I said that I could manage without one so you PROBABLY could too. Meaning you could OR could not. You continue to take my words and twist them into something you want them to say. But, I continue to write things that actually make sense and then I am able to go back and quote myself in order to prove you wrong. At the end of your statement, you say that I wrongfully accused you of becoming defensive because you were afraid of losing to me. I understand as to why you are saying that I was wrong in that portion of my argument, but I also still stand by what I said. An Ignorant fool with the worlds worst way of using basic grammar and no way to back up their own opinion would probably end up getting defensive in the end. Especially since they have to state that they 'Won the round' at the end of every argument in order to make themselves believe it. I, however, do not have to say this. My way of words speaks for itself. I don't want to be too aggressive, or insulting but in this case, I have no choice. The only thing you have done in this debate is trying to point out every one of my flaws. So here is a list of your own that I hope you can reflect on in the future before you try to start a debate you will surely lose. 1. You obviously did not think this debate through since just simply going on your profile was enough for me to prove you wrong 2. You have horrible grammar and should be embarrassed. You're sitting here trying to use personal slanders like gender and other insults to win a debate when no one is able to take you seriously because, of how bad you are at simply typing something. My dog uses better grammar than you. 3. You twist my words or repeat what I said. 4. Besides the fact that you didn't think people were active, and you didn't like that the website doesn't have its own search engine you never gave me reasons why this bothered you. 5. Stating that I failed at a rebuttal is just another one of your opinions that you failed to back up with reasoning. 6. Another thing you did is continuously say that you won a round. Well, we will see about that when the voting period is done. I wouldn't get your hopes up though. Now, I understand what you and other people who are reading this must think. And yes, I know that I am aggressive with my words, but so was my debate partner. At the end of the day, my opinions were backed up. There's were not. Thank you.