Here are a dozen easy-to-understand contradictions that indicate the impossibility of the God story

"The holy bible contains many metaphors and interpretations", and that in itself is a major fallacy. Would you like to know why? It was written by humans, and as amply displayed, humans are trash. God did not choose text as a form of communication, humans did, because Satan is assisting us on being dumb. Humans don't understand God; therefore we cannot describe Him completely. If we could understand the force that created us, we would be too simple to have such understanding power; therefore, it is a paradox... We are too simple to put God in easy-to-understand, catch-all words. The bible is what God told certain people, but humans wrote it into words and messed up the message a bit by putting in their own two bits. I am in a dumpster. Why else would I join this dump of a debate? Explain to me scientifically every detail of how sexual reproduction works, every aspect of the human body, and where it all started. I dare you. We know the basics of science, just like how we know the basics of God. You did not create the points, I know that. But you brought them up. You took them from the internet and brought them up on this website. Your arguments are based solely on your inability to understand my statements. If we're going down to grammar mistakes, then you've got plenty. You start off with an idea, you do not finish it, and then you bring up new incoherent ideas that you still go incomplete. That makes you creat run-on sentences with no coherent details and only hateful colloquial language. Jesus can be proven with flesh and blood, along with the observations written by others. Jesus came to fix humans' misinterpretations of the Bible, not God's words himself. You should be trashing Islam and Judaism because all of your arguments are based on the old testament. Christians believe that the old testament was flawed because of the way humans made it, and work hard to fix all fallacies. The bible was not God's chosen form of communication, we chose it because some of us wouldn't recognize God if he came knocking on our doors. That's how dumb humans are, enabled by Satan. Sorry, but you still are not bringing up full, coherent statements. Your argument was rushed, and you forgot to finish the ideas you bring up in these run-on sentences. Remember, periods aren't only the bloody mess you experience weekly... Probably more than that based on how you're responding with me. That was a joke, in case you haven't realized. I said how much I understand the topic. It's not a complete understanding, because actually, quantum mechanics forbid that. That was another joke because I know you won't get it. You know as much as I know. You have an opinion, as do I. You're wrong. I might be wrong. You forgot strike one and two, and strike three is the umpire's bias. 1. "No, you do not have free will because you believe in your God." Apart from the obvious grammatical errors, your statement is false. I chose to follow God in my free will. It doesn't mean I'm a good Catholic boi (joke), because I stray from what God wants me to do, because Satan is allowing me to do so. "God created humans in his image. (Genesis 1:26) Unlike animals, which act mainly on instinct, we resemble our Creator in our capacity to display such qualities as love and justice. And like our Creator, we have free will." (https://www.jw.org...). " "All that your hand finds to do, do with your very power."(Ecclesiastes 9:10). It took me not even a minute of research. The bible contradicts itself because it was written by humans who are obviously trash. God is not hypocritical, we are. Here's how I run things: I will not do research that is for your case. It is your job in a debate to condense that research into the number of words we are granted. I'm not going to say, "Attached is a novel I wrote that you must waste your time reading to prove my point." That is not how debates work. Come on, don't you remember ELA class in grade six? Obviously not. What I did was destroy what you brought up, and all you are doing is denying I did so incoherently and without evidence that I was wrong. God created Satan. Satan had free will, along with God. Satan chose to be evil and betrayed God. God could control us, but with the help of Satan, we have free will. Free will has everything to do with this because free will has consequences. One of the consequences is not having an easy escape from diseases and natural torment. Also, you do not press "shift" for apostrophes. They look like this: '. Not this: ". We are allowed to suffer because it is one of the consequences of free will. Consequences are justice, justice is not evil. True Christians don't believe they have a sure chance of going to heaven. We do have free will when we die. Those who would be rapists in heaven go to hell. Those who would continue to sin regularly would go to purgatory. Those who choose not to sin go to heaven. God can make a world with no suffering, but that would disallow free will. You do not understand what I am saying, but I know what you are saying, and I am proving you wrong. 2. God told someone, they wrote it. We need Satan for free will. Again, grammar is important for coherent arguments. Your coherency is missing. If he wanted to destroy Satan, he would. But he will not yet, to give us our free will. 3. I call that a human error because the humans who wrote the bible were not omniscient. I might have gotten me with this point and this point only, yet your strikes are just a lame excuse to ignore the 9 other points in which your opinion was destroyed effectively and coherently by yours truly. The score is 1-11; 11 for me, a sad 1 for you. If you don't respond, you lose terrifically. I will get back to you on your single point that you earned when I actually do some work for your lousy debate.