Syrian Refuges should be allowed to enter the United States of America.

In this final round I will explain why it is a bad idea to allow refugees into the US from Syria. I will use evidence already presented to support this argument so no new evidence will be presented. I will present my premises and finally my conclusion to the argument. In the last round I ended by stating that I would present a better way to handle the refugee crisis vice allowing them into the country. That will be presented later. Initially, I will say my prayers go out to the families of those who lost someone in the recent massacre in California. If this is anything this situation shows that we have enough issues to deal with our selves and should be very careful with adding new issues to the home front. My opposition has agreed to a plethora of my concerns put forward in this debate. The one that he has not touched is that Isis has an agenda. It would not be wise to ignore this. They are recruiting and there is no easier target than those who are already followers of Sharia law. There is no need for conversion only encouragement to act on those beliefs. Majority of Syrians are indeed Muslims and they follow Sharia law. My opposition has stated "Denying morally-decent Syrians an opportunity to improve their lives inside our borders because of where they were born and the religion they identify as makes us just as bad as the people we profess to fight abroad." The biggest problem with this premise is the fact that it misses the point of the issue. Sharia law is a religious law. And this law depicts a lot of conflicts with the constitution of the USA. Isis is on a mission to push their apocalyptic beliefs. This means it is a them versus us situation. Either you are with the program or against it, no gray here. My opponent stated in the earlier premise that if we deny the morally-decent refugees we will be just as Isis. I disagree with this premise because the citizens of the US are a lot more lenient than Isis is. We are not going to kill the refugees if they won"t conform but some refugees might kill non Muslims or moderate Muslims who won"t convert to or uphold Sharia law. It really does not matter if they are vented or not, If you are convinced to up hold Sharia law to it"s fullest then you will become a threat to the US way of life. Here is a question why don"t the neighboring countries of Syria take these refugees? There they would be more at home in stead of in such an alien location such as the US. Conclusively, the best way I can see us helping the refugee issue (without an absolute think-tank taking place) is to place boots on the ground. We can set up a safe zone in Syria with a no fly zone and all. A coalition can be started with other nations assisting. The refugees can come in and settle in this area. Here we can train the rebels that are fighting in the civil war. This way the men and women who wish to can fight for their home the way I would along with a few other US citizens. We would be able to ship supplies and anything else they would need, but most importantly our citizens won"t take on added risks. The opposition has stated "Good people deserve a chance as long as opportunities exist and there's a place to put them. Bad people do not." This is a plan that will help those good people out and give them an opportunity to thrive. The USA has enough domestic issues as is. Can we really afford to add on to the plate? And if we do at what cost? Once it starts it is extremely hard to go back. Lets be wise we know Isis" intentions, we should make it harder for them to accomplish this not easier. My opponent says we shouldn't"t let fear stop us from helping others; Contrarily, fear is a driving force that keeps people safe. We shouldn't"t let fear run us but we should respect it and take the causes of fear into consideration for our next moves. As I stated in the initial round, we should help we always have as a leading nation in world affairs. But we shouldn't"t risk our peoples safety in the process.