The Harry Potter series is superior to the Twilight saga.

" the Pro's statement does not do any thing but correct my statement"Not true. I gave quite a lengthy paragraph on how the HP characters have so much more depth and personality than the Twilight characters, resulting in a more entertaining read. " The media favour twilight more"Proof? The website you provided on the first round was an ETV article talking about the films. See rule 1.The second site is a blog post. I'd just like to quote some of the arguments this site gives"1. Robert Pattinson, can you say HOT? 2. Taylor Lautner, I mean, have you SEEN those muscles?"3. Kristen Stewart. An extremely talented and beautiful actress."All about the films. See rule 1.4. The Volturi. REALISTIC villains, instead of freaks in cloaks, like Voldemort.Realistic? The reason they hate Cullen is because he betrayed the "secret vampires" rule. So what do they do? Throw a massive scene in the middle of Volturra.... where of course no humans would see/hear about them. Unrealistic much?Voldemort and the death eaters are villains because they beleive in a superior race and want to wipe out everyone who is of dirty blood or who is a blood traitor. Sound a bit like Hitler to me. Pretty realistic.5. Its just common sence to like twilight!.Just like it's common sense to know how to spell the word "sense". Also common sense to like Twilight? Let's define common sense.Good sense and sound judgement in practical mattersI think the word they're looking for is conformity. 6. Because it's one of the greatest love stories ever!! Twilight has way more hot guys....EDWARD, JASPER, EMMETT, CARLISLE!! So th hot guys again? Does this mean that it will appeal to boys, children, adults and the elderly in the way which Potter does? Not really. It means it will appeal to some hormonal teenage girls.7 In Harry Potter it takes 7 or 8 books to get to the pointWriter clearly hasn't read the books. Irrelevent to the debate.8. Look at Harry and you'll see he's more angsty than BellaHarry is a kid who had a great responsibility of saving the magical world thrust upon him by Dumbledore. Thousands of people hate him and think he's a liar. He didnt ask for any of this and has the lives of millions of innocent people in his hands.Bella is a teenager who chose to get with a clearly dangerous guy and then can't deal with the consequences of her actions. Note the word "chose". Harry didnt ask for anything, Bella however asked for everything that happened to her.... And so it's bad that Harry is more angsty. Of course he would be! He has way more to deal with.9. Edward wasn't a dork. Harry was a bit too dorky and I can't see why girls even liked him. So Edward was shallow and devoid of personality (and as the writer mentions a lot, sexy) and he got a girl. Harry was nerdy but was funny, charming, witty, lovable, kind, compassionate and brave. He got a girl. Yeah... and the writer thinks Harry is the loser here? Put it in perspectiveThere are so many more points which this post says which are 100% incorrect. One is that all of Hermione's problems are self-created and that she should quit Hogwarts (this would make her strong like Bella!?) Sorry but when you have issues and you decide to stay in school, it doesnt mean that your problems are self created. Your second example uses arguments like how the twilight box sets are nicer than the Harry potter ones, how the Twilight movie logo is cooler than the HP logo, and another is how the Harry Potter author isnt as famous as Meyer. Rowling's only made $700 000 000 more than Meyer right? Your third example is a copy of all the arguments in the first one. And every single one of the comments is disagreeing with the forum poster, which I find pretty funny.I understand that you didnt write these websistes, but when an E!TV article and two blog posts with arguments about the characters good looks and how the box sets are prettier are the best sites you can find to prove your point about Twilight having better media reception, there's something wrong.