The Bible translations are an unreliable source and contain at least one text which is contradictive

Con has contested my definition of the words Murder And Kill. I did not exclude humans from the definition of the translation, Thou Shall Not Kill, I stated that kill applies to all living things, Hence, that includes humans as humans are also living things. Thou shall not murder only applies to man, so if the correct word is murder then killing of other beings is not included. But if the correct translation is, Thou shall not kill, then that includes all living beings. Including humans. So I see no problem with my definition here....... All murder is killing but not all killing is murder. Con also goes on to say which is the correct translation, He claims the correct translation is, Thou Shall Not Murder, and further defines it as killing another person in cold blood. Of course that fits very nicely. But If we consider the text, Thou Shall Not Kill, it does not state in cold blood or only humans,, it simply says, thou shall not kill. and should apply to all living things. I thought Con would favor the Thou shall not murder translation as it would better suit his own ideology. as he has chosen to admit their is a correct translation of the choice of two, and he choose the translation of murder which only applies to man.....and makes no justification to the translation of thou shall not kill. and in choosing one as correct we must assume the other as wrong, as both statements can not be both true at in the same sense at the same time. Con further goes on to state, that only the original text is the inspired word of God. He said.... Remember that the translations of Scripture are not inspired, only the original texts. So I take this that Con concedes here to defend the translations of the Bible, in that they should be correct like the inspired word of God in the original texts...... But I would like to remind the audience here, that I am not bringing the original text into question, I am questioning the reliability of the Bible translations into question. Con fails to recognise the confusion amongst scholars regarding this verse and the two words, some translate the word as murder and some translate the word as kill. In any case, both can not be correct, Kill applies to all living things, and murder only applies to man. Here is some proof of the confusion amongst biblical scholars, it's not as straight forward as Con would like you to think, indeed there is major dispute about the true meaning of the word, and the decision of the true meaning still remains in the balance, and is disputed to this day..... ~ Thou Shalt Not Kill ~ Exodus 20:13 - Deuteronomy 5:17 The exact Hebrew wording of this biblical phrase is lo tirtzack. One of the greatest scholars of Hebrew/English linguistics (in the Twentieth Century) -Dr. Reuben Alcalay - has written in his mammoth book the Complete Hebrew /English Dictionary that "tirtzach" refers to "any kind of killing whatsoever." The word "lo," as you might suspect, means "thou shalt not." Various "Translations" of the 6th Commandment 'Thou shalt not kill any living thing,' for life is given to all by God, and that which God has given, let not man taketh it away. ~Jesus, Gospel of the Holy Twelve, (earliest known recorded words of Jesus) "Thou shalt not kill." ~Exodus 20:13 Authorized version of King James "You shall not murder." ~New International Version http://www.thenazareneway.com... I thank my opponent for accepting this debate, and hope he can see the distinction between the two words, and both sentences can not be both true in the same sense at the same time and thus proving a vital contradiction in the translations, not the original texts which is not the resolution. I also thanks the audience.