Call of Duty:Modern Warfare 2 is a better game than Call of Duty:Black Ops

Thank you again for participating in this debate. I am very surprised to not be able to find sources on camping/shotguns/knifing in this game because it is such a huge problem and complained about constantly. You can have those three points they are irrelevant to my point anyhow. I will be dropping all of my personal experience out of this conclusion because you have such a huge problem with it. Experienced Player Clarification: I define as someone who puts a considerable amount of time into the game to get good and/or play online competitively. Unfortunately the only experienced players I have sourced is my own team, I will not waste any more space on this point though. Spawns: Finally found a legitimate source to prove my point. “The game seems to be respawning players must closer to the enemy compared to Modern Warfare 2, and while the spawn points in that were by no means perfect, it looks like Black Ops isn’t better off either. Furthermore, we’ve seen that the game often respawns you in a random place next to a teammate, but this has often proved a disadvantage more than an advantage, as you often get wiped out by the rushing enemy before you have a chance to find your bearings. Obviously, there is nothing worse than dying straight after you have respawned, so we hope Treyarch address this issue in their first patch update to the game.”[1] Definition of Better: Oh my… I should of known you would have twisted those words. My definition of better IS what would have sold more if it was purchased off of its own merit instead of some “insane” marketing campaign. MEANING user reviews directly correlate with a game being better. That I thought was clear but it clearly wasn’t… I’ll explain a bit further when we get to Black Ops selling more. Black Ops Selling More: Black Ops selling more is by no means showing that its better. Let’s say ProductA is quite obviously better than ProductB, however ProductB has a HUGE marketing budget. Both Products are available for pre-order. ProductB gets two large budget T.V. Commercials and a Jeep named after it, ProductA does not. Which do you think will sell more pre-orders? And eventually more in the long run without people even trying it. Of course ProductB, that’s not even arguable…[3] Research: As I stated before, yes I research and ask around about a game before I buy it… now… tell me. How do you research a game before it’s released? You have to accept what the developer shows you as truth. You cannot ask friends or other consumers because it’s not out yet. Black Ops pre-sales were through the roof because of the marketing behind it, it was the new shiny toy everyone wanted to play. Once again, having to repeat myself. Further Evidence of User Reviews: “Call of Duty: Black Ops Vs MW2: Which is better? MW2 is an easy winner (46%, 4,792 Votes) Black Ops wins hands down (23%, 2,386 Votes) MW2 edges it (17%, 1,806 Votes) Black Ops just slightly (14%, 1,409 Votes)” [2] Conclusion: I have clearly proven that Modern Warfare is a better game than Black Ops, I have shown you user reviews and reasons why the game is poorly designed. My opponent has only tried to rebut my arguments about the games design flaws, (mostly) succeeding, but still not able to rebut the user reviews other than try and make my definition of better seem like something it’s not, thus negating my argument about user reviews. Furthermore my opponent repeatedly referred to Black Ops selling more as an indication that the game was better, which I have proven is not true. I thank my opponent for this wonderful debate and wish him luck in the voting period. Thank you all for taking the time to read this debate and vote. Sources: [1] http://www.product-reviews.net... [2] http://www.product-reviews.net... [3] Common Sense