Meaning, purpose, and value cannot be filled without God

I will frame my argument in three ways- Firstly, I will largely agree with Pros final contentions, that without God there is no Objective Meaning, Purpose and Value, and that this is in fact the case. Secondly, I will argue against the ACTUAL debate topic, that without God there is no Meaning, purpose or value- note the Pro did not initially include "objective" in the argument. He then ARGUED for "objective" meaning, and thus his initial argument could be largely discounted, as all the would need to be shown is that there is another type of Meaning, Purpose and Value (abbreviated to MPV from now on!!) than OBJECTIVE MPV to invalidate his entire claim to this point. I will, however, argue that there is NOT an Objective MPV WITH god- Now while this may not specifically invalidate the strict semantics of the debate title, I do feel that the Pro is proposing a dichotomy- that there can only be MPV WITH god, and disproving that equally invalidates the premise. So I'll start with the Pros definitions- "Meaning has to do with significance, why something matters" I'm happy with that. So, is there objective meaning at all? I believe not. We are a single species on a small planet in one solar system in one galaxy in a vast Universe. If we became extinct tomorrow it would have no effect on the overwhelming majority of the Universe. Is the rest of the Universe, according to Pro, equally Gods creation? If we have some special meaning, why would our eradication have so little impact on the vast bulk of what is equally creation? Have not millions of other species become extinct? Did the Universe become less meaningful with THEIR demise? With or without a god, our existence has little impact on anything but ourselves, so the idea of objective meaning is quite meaningless. But can we find meaning absent objectivity and God. We certainly CAN- it is up to us. It matters to me whether I stay alive, healthy and happy. It matters to me that that my loved ones thrive and are happy. it matters to me that I experience love, beauty and joy. These things matter because I have a pre-disposition for them to matter. Were I to develop a mental state such that I no longer felt this way, and perhaps wished to end my life, that meaning would no longer exists. These meanings exist as long as they mean something to ME- they have no intrinsic existence and cease to exist when I cease to hold them- they are subjective, not objective, yet that makes them no less valuable to me. For the sake of the argument, I'll let it go that Mother Teresa is held as an example of good- the fact that shew was a cruel, narcissistic sadist can be left in abeyance- the point that some are good can be examined. Again, we decide as a species what subjective acts we will tolerate, but that does not mean they are decided on through some absolute standard. There have been at least as many killed in ways we justify as there have in ways we condemn. we DECIDE which acts conform to our subjective standards-the fact that almost every conflict has two opposing views of what is "right" seems to be evidential of this. Hitler killed 7 million Jews, and started a war that killed perhaps 50 million more. This was, however, a tiny percentage of the worlds population. Whether you take it as myth or fact, was there not an act represented in your holy book where your God- the supposed source of your objective values- killed the entire population of the planet bar six people and two of each animal (supposedly because of the wickedness of the people- but what did all the other animals do wrong?). Let's place an objective value on that act- where do we now rank Hitler, Teresa and Yhwy on the objective scale of wickedness? On purpose you have made my argument for me. Yes, the Universe will one day die, and nothing we do will have change that for a milli-second. It will all be gone. So clearly we have no objective purpose. we DO have whatever purpose we decide to pursue, If we don't WANT a purpose, there is no external reason to have one, but we can if we like. The entire initial argument from Pro seem to be "argument from preference". In other words, the alternative to the stated proposition is distasteful, and thus must be untrue. This is the most basic of logical fallacies- truth is independent of whether it is desirable or not. So there is no objective MVP in our lives with or without God. There is as much subjective MVP as we choose to pursue. The proposition is invalidated.