Resolved: I-am-a-panda is a Panda

The first argument, which involves the Prophet David being a false prophet, is hereby invalidated, due to the fact that the Prophet David is not the same person as David Beckham. The Prophet David is our (C-Mach and I-am-a-panda) age and the only relation he could possibly have to David Beckam is the sharing of a given name and the fact that they live in Los Angeles. So, this could only mean that your assumption that the Prophet David is a false prophet is false. " >> Firstly, I gave the definition of who David was. You have no proof that this False Prophet wannabe is the real 'Prophet'. Furthermore, the very fact they have lived in the same city AND share the same name leads me to believe David Beckham has used his ways as an egotistic and inherently bad flashy Footballer turned false prophet to make this other David believe he is a prophet. It is akin to Lord Voldemort placing his souls in Horcruxes. " And by the way, those videos dont't prove a damn thing. You ask, "Why don't the prove a damn thing? " They're from Family Guy. " >> Excuse me, but at least I have some sort of video evidence. I am actually great friends with the German Queen of England, Elizabeth II, who is in turn lovers with Seth McFarlane. She can 100% verify McFarlane was in fact recording my life thus far on her bequest. " I said that you MIGHT BE the Earthy incarnation of Articus, not that you ARE the Earthly incarnation of Articus. " >> The I have proven that I am NOT the prophet Articus. Job done there :D! " Grammatical errors are a b*tch, aren't they? When you said, "What's not more non-Jesus than a Chinese Panda? " in the first round, I was a bit confused (I knew what you meant to say, I'm just using grammar rules. ). Since you used a double negative, one could only assume that you meant to say "What's more Jesus than a Chinese Panda? " Since there is something more Jesus than a Chinese Panda (Hence "I don't know. .. Jesus? "), I simply chose the correct answer to that rhetorical question. However, one could use it with an emphasis on the first "not," and still come up with the correct answer. " >> It is now time for me to reveal my true purpose. You see, God took a bloody good nap in the 1930's. In that time, Satan infested himself in the Austrian Dictator of Germany, Adolf Hitler. God woke up late on 1944, to find the humans had barely won. In that part, he made a string of spy-prophets. He also made the internetz. However, the creation of another group reminded him of his folly, Grammar Nazi's. I was created fro combating them. Now you have rooted yourself out. If you find close friends (David), your parents, siblings, cousin, etc. shot up, it;s just business. I am not however covered to destroy property. I will compensate blood stained carpets and smashed in windows, for example. And you well knew what I meant. " One again, "Grammatical errors are a b*tch, aren't they? " I didn't know that you could "Mahinda" anything, assuming that "Mahinda" is a verb (Once again, "I knew what you meant to say, I'm just using grammar rules. )". " >> It should say I KNOW Mahinda quite well. Sorry, again, Grammar Nazi. " Grammatical errors that will never stop. "Yur. " I've never heard that one before. However mine makes absolutely no sense without a comma in between "However" and "mine. " "Seeingness" is not a word. However (Correct punctuation! ), I will argue my point anyway. Have you ever considered the possibility of the dark circles under your eyes are there for the same reason (Dehydration. )? " >> Spawn of the Fascist Devil. Of course they're not due to dehydration! I am a Godly spawn made to fight against Grammar Nazis. I am quite frustrated. I am going to chat with the British President of Ireland.