An Afterlife is NO threat to an Atheist viewpoint :)

I must say I'm not that suprised you forfietted, But it is poetically ironic that you who were quite demanding that the only terms you would debate me on was 2 day period long debate rounds when we were first agreeing on terms of debate challenge, and only after I drew the line I would not accapt unless I had 3 days, at the comprimise of debating 5 rounds with you, It was you who did not keep to the debate for all 5 rounds being given even more time than you wanted to have.But perhaps this debate forfiet was on purpose because you do not want to shame all the intellegent athiest debaters on this website by showing them there are screaming examples of athiest like yourself that are every unintellegent thing they would like to specifically associate with religion and faith. But here you are to show that any person of faith who comes of as unintellegent in there methods of debate or anti-science and anti-thinking, this actually is not caused by there religion for here you are, keeping yourself as distanced as you can from religion and you are clearly anti-thinking and really kind of anti-science as well I think to other fellow athiest eyes I expect.by the fact that you are anti-science I do not mean that you dont believe in something you or even most people commenly refer to as the 'sciences' of physics of all sorts, but that you do not show yourself to take side of science on the inherent properties of science itself that should uphold itself (and for that matter I believe it does uphold itself on its own well), instead you believe in all the athiest positions on science because you have faith in the many famous scientiest of today. Your entire mindset rest on grounds of the athority of other people who study quantum physics while you yourself do not really understand anything about it.you have faith in the 'established fact' of the theory of evolution in the scientific community, but you unlike other athiest dont actually have a decent personal understanding of it yourself to do more than parrot out some commonly presented soundbite defenses of it. you here people of athority and who have minds that actually think like scientist (something you cant do) speak about the higgs boson partical in a short interview on CNN that had CNN's pittiful attempt to turn it into a religion vs science controversy as if a 'god partical' somehow disproves God. But you dont really know enough to explain why that is yourself so your best arguments you can form for it are 'learn about the higgs boson you will know'.most athiest of intellegence I have actually debated with or just conversed with actualy laugh at the idea any of those things could disprove God. at best it can make God a less nessesary extended deeper explination of the begining of the universe. But everyone knows God is still a viable possible extension because the 'God theory' is a theory about 'why' things occured they way they have and it really does not matter the specifics of the 'how' are in order to answer the 'why'.is evolution how God made the life on earth diverse? mabyeis the higgs boson partical how God worked his wonders to create the big bang to create the universe as we know it? mabyeif evolution worked as we understand it, why did it happen so? athiest answer: I dont know, it just did. thiest answer: Its how God choose to express himself in his creation.if the higgs boson ignited the big bang, why did it happen that way? athiest answer: I dont know it just did does there need to be a reason? theiest answer: That how God wanted to express himself.Its not hard for anyone who understand anything about what they are talking about to see why none of that stuff really has drastic impacts on thiesm. But since you dont have the ability to understand any of this, only someone of high athority can teach you that. Too bad your so selective though in who you would allow to have you learn such things from.you call yourself a big kid, but you are actually as childish in the fields of thinking as they can ever come. unable to speak on terms with us adults, you can only find a real adults hand to cling onto and let them guide you and have faith they themselves will not get lost. and because you dont really understand or even take serious grown-up atempts at trying to understand anything thats going on, you can only try picking the adults you want to trust. the ones say things that scare you you stay away from, as you dont want to accapt the truth could be frightening, and the ones that say want you want to here, and hand you candy, these people you will take the hand of so they can lead you straite into the dark.--------------------------------------------------------------------------If you should choose to try and redeam yourself by posting next round something of worth, while I think its far too late to save a victory for yourself in this paticular debate, I ask you to please, just for my benifit personally respond to the things I have said about Panthiesm.as I said I know you have difficulty understanding anything grown-ups talk about and are prone to here nothing from grown-ups who you do not already like or want to trust, but I would need to see how you react to being informed about Panthiesm so that I might be better equiped to compact my explanation, and argument from and for panthiesm in the future so that even a child can understand it. gauging your own reaction will be the best way to help me learn how to do that right now.