BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Rap battle:Truth_seeker vs. Danielle

Wow! you really think that was dope?! Pfft you a joke! Off the top of my dom, i spit the sickest stuff i ever wrote! If i had a dollar for every time you started with that, i'd be broke! I'm flexin' in these clothes, you'll want to take me to the bed just watch! My n*gga Shadow! I'm about to discover scientific evidence for Sasquatch! If you climbed on my face, the bed'll break at the weight of an ogre You'll only hold me down, can't bear the weight of the world on my shoulder Yo, i swear, every time a n*gga tried to go deep in, they drowned That's why you when it comes to relationships, you just take a rebound Cuz you scare every human being, their organs just cannot be found But in all seriousness, the 1st verse is ABAB *yawn* that's so borin' In real life, i'm soarin' roarin' like a lion, i'm tourin', roamin' as i'm explorin' Cuz i'm the king of the streets, of rap, of the city, and of the 8th mile, i'm just too wild so bend down under my leash, we move back n' forth, this isn't free, this is doggiestyle Funny how you talk about you being on top of me, you have fantasies of my long hair You be masturbatin' but online you hatin', talkin bout "he's so fair like my very night-mare!" Cuz you love the texture of men with long hair, so you all over about hair-products My dear madam, we know that your gonna need 56 different kinds of civil conducts On your profile, it says that you of all people support secular humanism! Haha i laugh at insults of the Bible, cuz you have the same biased idealism! I close my eyes and predict that you have a strap-on and it's really stiff Your really a lesbian who is insecure, modelin' herself after Taylor Swift Don't take this personally, cuz me and your people are technically gangbangin' Diss me n' i'ma be slammin' crashin' rammin' draggin' you tho my pants saggin' All your female friends think that this virgin (me) is dominatin', total smashin' So salute me like you would respectfully do your master or face eternal disaster faster Right now, i don't need a blaster, cuz i'm the pastor runnin' you over like a tractor Lady says she's engaged...to which one? the right one? Girl, there's 98 of em! Like a paintball gun, you get stunned, shunned like a nun, cuz you just have fun! I resemble Charles Manson's cousin, you know why? Cuz i straight up murder! I'm hysterical, bring your mother in, hurt her then gobble up the sheep herder! I wipe you like the scum off my feet, call that sanctification Then kill you in this battle, lay hands, bring you back, restoration Like a pack of wolves attackin' a sickly, old, n' crippled elk! So shall you fall over and know how Lucifer's defeat felt!
Rap battle:Truth_seeker vs. Danielle

You might as well forfeit cause to diss me requiresSomething inspired by more than talking Lizzie McGuireSee I'll burn you hotter than fires from electrical wiresCause your skills are as fictional as Biblical principles, liar! Now I'm tired-- your rhymes, they put me to sleepYour lyrics are so shallow they make kiddie pools look deepBut you try to come off like you're oh so enlightenedBet you couldn't go to school cause it made the other kids frightened So you make fun of MY looks and hope that irks me but it doesn't That's brave coming from someone who looks like Charles Manson's cousinYou look like a less handsome Hanson in gothic fashion Your rap's such a turn off it could even strip Christ of all Passion And right, my figure's huge - sure if you say soBut you stare at my boobs and wish they would move like Winnebagos We know you still want me on top of your face like a haloBut dude I'd be more attracted to a sack of potatoes So do yourself a favor and spare yourself from the shame Of Rounds 2, 3, 4 and 5 where I'll embarrass you again You know it - my ethereal lyrical skills are so spiritual Start your serial prayer now fool because you need a miracle
Rap battle:Truth_seeker vs. Danielle

sitting on that chair blondie we can see that you're not tough I came here to battle rap, not look at the 90s version of Hilary Duff you look like bubbles from that show, you're a perfect Powerpuff all you do is sit there and look pretty, you cotton candy fluff I said, I came here to fight, not stare at Lady Gaga disguised as a mystical and myhtical Naga Looking at them breasts, we all know they made of plastic But you remind me of that barbie song "my boobs are fantastic " I sure hope you don't do a video rap, don't wanna know that mouth elastic sweetie we both know you can't hurt me, cuz you're sweeter than Baby Ruth you need to polish that plastic face some more, missed a spot and that's Truth The only time you know about "bars" is when your with porn stars! You live the fast life with fast cars n' smokin' dope gettin' high as mars! What's crackin' Danielle? You used to do this all the time you got fired? Or did you get so old that you cracked down n' just quit n' retired? I ain't intimidated by you and your advanced techniques You only got a streak cuz all you fought was weaklings We got the crowd waitin' on you so your going to prove your not one of em cowards? In this rap battle, i'm a wicked power crashin' you over like the twin towers! You can bring in hell, but i'm the one who raised you in it I can break a holy writ to have you slit so you'll commit So submit to my will as in this battle, your gettin' lyrically raped N' we got the crowd waitin' on you, you want to get video-taped? Yo 'figure is so huge, to cover your nakedness, you need a quilt You certainly have no guilt being a hard-working full-time milf I swear, if you were the next generic version of Barbie Then I'm the leader of the next world wide army After I'm done breaking that soft heart and causing a fracture you're going to need to find yourself a better manufacturer
Switzerland is better than America.

I disagree with both the resolution, and the fact that only stating your opinion is a good idea. Argument: America's flag represents our 50 current states (with the stars), and the original 13 colonies (represented by the red and white stripes). This shows America is proud of its origins. What does Switzerland have? How about Pro explain-- Oh, right! He can't. This is literally a 1 round debate. America has also participated in several World Wars, and won. Our presidents were really good, like George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Donald Trump! Wait, what? America is where Christopher Columbus learned that the Earth is spherical. Many other explorers came to America searching for gold and glory. If any of this is false, Pro, please refute-- oh, wait. 1 Round Debate. Right. I'm the only one who presented an argument. Rebuttal: "Switzerland is better than America." In what way? America is clearly superior, according to my arguments and Pro's lack of arguments. I will finish off with this: America!
It would be mutually beneficial for farmers in the West to recruit agricultural interns from Africa

Apologies for the short reply, work got busy before the Christmas holiday and I lost track of time. I have 10 minutes to reply but I will try to get some in. I understand the points that you are making with this, in regards to the NGOs and the bonded labour not being "enforced" however, I do not see how using people as unpaid labor then forcing them to repay the farmers with no income of their own (as you stated they're unpaid) is not slavery, nor is it ethical or worthwhile for them. You state in point #2 that they're in debt like a college intern to the bank or mom and dad but those college interns or graduates make money little or a lot they get paid, you specifically stated "unpaid" therefore it negates that ability to pay back and flaws the argument. If you said minimal payment it is slightly understandable but you did not say that. Voluntary vs. forced tattoo is completely different. Do victims of the holocaust see their tattoos as souvenirs of a historic tragedy? No. This would just be another means of degrading people into a commodity rather than a person. Overall this idea is flawed, to truly assist those in Africa or other developing places , NGOs make the most use and while not particularly highly effective, it is the best option we have short of actual government intervention. This system my opponent suggests is re-legalizing slavery, however it is sugar coated, we already complain about mnimal pay for child labour in places, this is unpaid.
It would be mutually beneficial for farmers in the West to recruit agricultural interns from Africa

So I first want to say I chose this argument because I love debating radical ideas. Now, I'm REALLY hoping that you're just having fun with this debate and it is not created due to your lack of understanding the 13th Amendment of the Constitution, but nonetheless I will argue it from a stand of it being serious. I'd like to address a few points in your argument in turn. 1. African farmers don't meet the demand for a multitude of reasons. Not just limited knowledge, in fact that is a very small part as there are multiple NGOs that specialize in this, including The One Acre Fund and Hands Up Africa. Both of these organizations provide not only knowledge but also equipment for farming, a much more needed asset. Many of the problem are not due to supply and demand but due to war, oppressive governments, and lack of funds to purchase and maintain proper equipment. None of these things are solved by your system. 2. Unpaid labor interns, that must pay their way back. Well, while interns are a often used form of labor by college students and low-level employees, the requirement of them paying debts to the farmers is highly illegal. Paying a low level of wage is something that used to be called "indentured servitude" people getting paid very little to pay off their passage to America or other places. However, importing "interns" and charging "shipping costs" and other fees without any payment to them as you state "unpaid labour" is what is known as slavery. 3. Marking the "interns" with tattoos, that's fairly inhumane as it is indicating that they are essentially property...slaves. 4. I see no way that the people of Africa will win in this situation. By reducing the cost of Western crops, it would allow them to export much more therefore flooding the African markets which are quite small anyway. Governments over there would not support local farmers that would require enormous overhead costs to get all the equipment needed and setting up the farms themselves, they would rather just import. Then after all the costs that your slavery imposed upon them, if they ever did get back to Africa, they would never be able to afford running a farm. Your argument is inherently flawed from the start and there is no substance behind this being a plausible idea, let alone the fact that it is a means of trying to circumvent the 13th Amendment.
It would be mutually beneficial for farmers in the West to recruit agricultural interns from Africa

Farmers in Europe and America are always complaining that they are not rich enough: they say this is partly because the relatively high cost of farm labour in the West makes their produce uncompetitive in the global marketplace. Meanwhile in Africa farmers struggle to produce enough food even to meet local demand, mainly because the natives are not familiar with the modern farming techniques that are employed in the West to increase productivity and improve yields. With this being the case, it would make perfect sense for farmers in the West to import agricultural interns from Africa who, in return for unpaid labour on their farms, would acquire valuable knowledge and skills which they could take back to Africa with them once they have worked long enough to repay the debt they owe the farmer who sponsored their trip. Naturally, farmers must be entitled to protect their investments from agricultural intern-rustlers by housing their horticultural trainees in secure accommodation and by giving them unique tattoos to identify their sponsors, thus deterring unscrupulous rural neighbours from luring agricultural interns away by offering them alternative work placement opportunities on their own farms. But the real winners will be the people of Africa - the agricultural interns only have to reimburse the Western farmer's expenses: the shipping costs; the agricultural intern-trader's recruitment fees; the ongoing cost of providing the intern with food and shelter, plus the customary administration charges, with interest added to the debt as appropriate, before they will be free to work their passages back to their homelands where they will be able to pass on their knowledge of Western agriculture to help develop their local farming industries. That's why I believe that it would be mutually beneficial for farmers in the West to recruit agricultural interns from Africa. Thank you.
Humans Would Defeat Zombies in a Global Pandemic

OK now I would be pointing out how in this day in age a zombie outbreak would fail. Lets go through a scenario: How A Zombie Outbreak Cannot Expand In a major city in the United States a person has to be sent to the hospital because he is very sick. When sent there, the doctors have no idea how to treat it, but try to find ways, but then the patient starts acting violent and bites several people in the hospital and scratches several others. Soon the infection starts through the entire city as police try to fend off the zombies, but the US military arrives and blocks the entire city so no one can get through unless they are not infected and even then they have to get inspected by the CDC. Soon the zombies have ended up stuck in a city and if they even come close to the ring of fortifications around it they will be killed. This is one reason why the zombies will not win. They are mainly slow moving creatures and we can easily encircle them. Even if they managed to take an entire country the borders of nearby countries would be watched. People Know How to Kill Zombies In all the movies people are really scared and don't know where to shoot zombies. Then they somehow learn head shots do the trick. This is also known through video games like Call of Duty: Black Ops' zombie mode. It is now common sense to kill a zombie in the head. Furthermore, people know to avoid zombies to. Science May be Able to make A Vaccination Now despite many movies depicted scientists as failing to find a vaccine who is not to day they very well could? Weather and Terrain Would Assist in Stopping Zombies I do not think zombies do well in winter storms. They can get caught in steep mountains to where people would be able to stay on. Zombies can easily be stopped by something as simple as a buildings to or a concrete wall. Underground Bunkers The government and the elite no doubt have hiding spots to go to where they can hide in these bunkers with food to last them several lifetimes. They would just simply hide down there until their deaths. Vivos has also been making underground shelters in case of emergencies. If the Zombie Apocalypse is unstoppable the Governments will Drop the Big Ones By Big Ones I mean nukes. If there was all hope lost I am sure the governments would see this as the final solution.
One-Word Battle

This is a word battle where each person will post one word and the voters may decide who posted a better word. There will be restrictions on the type of word you can use though. Rules1. The word must be appropriate and must not contain any extra meaning. 2. If the word has multiple meanings, then all of the meanings must be appropriate. 3. The characters of the word must be over 4. 4. The word must also be a word that the person already knows and not a word that he will learn later on.5. Any Word that defies one of the rules shall be considered as a forfeited round. This is to prevent any unnecessary arguing over the opponents word. 6. If the word meets the rules then there may not any negative comments toward whatsoever.7. The limit of characters shall be 15 to prevent overly large words that either me or my opponent may use.8. To provide voters with their own chance to cast votes of their own opinions, no comments may be posted in the comments section that may influence the voters decision in any way. This debate has two rounds because we will each post our one word in the second round.
There is no proof that God exists

It made an interesting first debate for me on here and I will certainly be taking part in more. Up until not I actually hadn't heard of the arguement proposed! I would also like to apoligise as I missed putting in my source link at the end of round 3 and even though the debate has reached an end, I would like to include it as I genuinly meant to before. The link regarding the amount of deaths attributed to God and where they are through the bible is at;. http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.co.uk...Other than that, I look forward to watching Cons future debates, this was fun.
There is no proof that God exists

To Begin One does not have to show that a world where a pig flies is logically or metaphysically possible, there is clearly nothing impossible with it and Pro's objection is delving into radical logical and metaphysical skepticism. God is clearly logically possible because it is not like a perfectly spherical cube (the concept contains no contradiction and is consistent). This is all that is needed to show that a maximally great being is possible and exists in some possible world. OmnipotentEven if The Bible claims he cannot do something, omnipotence is a great making property. Therefore, a maximally great being would have omnipotence independently of any Bible verses. A logical problem of evil is provided here, but this problem is not taken seriously in philosophy as Plantinga's Free-Will Defense shows that beings with free will is good, and beings with free-will entail the ability to do evil. It would be wrong to interfere with our free-will, so it is no shocker than evil exists and that Theism is true. OmnipresentThis is a great making property. This holds regardless of The Bible. OmniscientThis is a great making property. This holds regardless of The Bible. A Maximally Great BeingThis section fails because it assumes a version of omnipotence most Theists do not adhere to. If God is omnipotent, then he can only do what is logically and metaphysically possible and things which do not contradict other aspects of his nature. The Modal Ontological ArgumentThis parody argument fails because evil is not a great making property, omnibenevolence is (which negates the possibility of God being evil). Therefore, the term "maximally great""evil" being is logically contradictory. In conclusionPro misunderstands what it means to be possible in Modal Logic, thus his first objection failed. Also, him pointing out Bible contradictions means nothing because the great making properties would be so regardless. The logical problem of evil fails as it does not incorporate free will, and the parody argument fails because a "maximally great""evil" being is incoherent. My argument stands. I apologize for not taking more time on this, but in reality Pro's misunderstanding of the argument did not give me much to work with.
Unalienable Rights

Less than 250 years ago Thomas Jefferson claimed that all humans have Unalienable Rights. We may consider “Happiness” as being some form of positive-feedback after the accomplishment of an objective. Also, survival is a prerequisite for any form of positive-feedback. We may include the joy of a meal satisfying one's hunger, is a process of survival, a form of positive-feedback. In general all life, strives to survive. Therefore, once alive, all “Life” must have the freedom (“Liberty”) in “the pursuit of” survival; otherwise, there is no life. Survival is a form of positive-feedback, and for us humans, survival is a prerequisite for “Happiness. ” It would seem, unbeknownst to Jefferson, he discovered, not developed, a primeval working function found throughout all living-systems. He claimed a polished version of this primeval function, within the scope of humanity, giving it the label of Unalienable Rights in the celebrated form of, “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. ”Jefferson's objective was to sway opinion for independence and to upset His Royal Highness King George III with such a phrase, as it flew in the face of the prevailing political theory of the day. Also, Jefferson's term of Unalienable Rights became the foundation to the US Constitutional design of governance, which sparked a social experiment within a short period of 200-years, changed the world like no other society in recorded history, through the fruits of technology, food production, and medicine, the stables of human existence throughout the world today. A compelling example of what happens when our Unalienable Rights are free to flow within the awesome machinery of nature. From recent research, life's primeval working function (aka Unalienable Rights) is an outgrowth of the Constructal Law, which is an outgrowth of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Therefore, life's Unalienable Rights are part of the physical Laws of Nature, not man-made. . http://www.amazon.com...http://www.amazon.com...
Utopia is impossible to achieve within any given society

I would like to offer my most sincere apology about my forfeiting of the last round. . . .I was out of town in the Colorado mountains and had no access to computers, much less internet . . .. now for my rebuttal . . . . I will deal with each of your three points individually. [1] The argument clearly states that Utopia is impossible to achieve (emphasis on achieve). The first example that you stated was merely an example of what utopia to the imaginary mind is. Utopia was never truly achieved, it was merely planned out, and the word was given its meaning from the book. [2] Being American, I know that America is not the "ideal" place. It has its own social and economic problems. Crime is not uncommon and while granted it may be a "better" place comparatively it is no utopia. [3] For this point I had to sit down and chuckle. C politicians voice "drips with honey" however, when it comes down to it they never truly accomplish what they say they will. Politicians attempt to win votes by claiming that they have a "plan" time and time again. Take for example your own country, Romania. How many candidates have said that their "visions for Romania are perfect." So is Romania now a utopia? A perfect community? Obviously not if the people "see America like the land of hope." (understand that I mean no disrespect in any way towards Romania or the people of Romania) Now for my own contention [1] Utopia will never be achieved due to differing views of what utopia actually is . . . for example: many religions agree that final utopia will be reached in heaven. However, their views and beliefs of what heaven will be differ. For Christians it is that we will spend eternity praising and living in the glory of the Almighty. However for Muslims, there are 70 virgins waiting for them.(I'm not solid on the facts of this religion, so please correct me if I am mistaken) -----------------Also note: this is not a "religious" argument, it is merely comparing the two ideas of religions------------