Who Would Make a Better Husband for YYW

In this round, I shall review my case, and then refute the Texan's. But, before I begin, I must point out that the Texan is copying my idea of using Youtube videos to woo the magnificent and sensual YYW. I must point how unoriginal the Texan is being, and so I refer him to the first video. Get out of my way! No one can stand in the way of me and my beloved! The obnoxious lyrics are symbolic of the Texan's obnoxious obstructionism--barring the way between us! Moreover, in the event that the great YYW watches the clip, I have selected one with a visual that he should find...stimulating.As for names, I would remind YYW that Maryland was the first state to legalize Gay Marriage by popular vote. Maryland is the wealthiest state in America, the Star Spangled Banner was written here, our state capital was once the national capital, and we have Chesapeake Bay Retrievers [1], which are so much more fluffy and awesome than Blue Lacys (Texas's dog). [2] What is Texas known for? Racism, hurricanes, and 10-gallon hats. Clearly, YYW should vote for Maryland. We have equality, patriotism, and adorable canines!PRO's CASESEXSo, Con says that sex is all I have to offer, and that I'm a "white guy." Knowing YYW, I don't think the fact I'm white would deter him from having sex with me. Also, the Texan is white...just saying'. I'll also get to the "god-like" powers claim later in this round.I think YYW wouldn't want to "sleep around." He seems like the type who wants to marry someone he can be with in a loving, monogamous relationship. He wants someone he can love, but who he can also have amazing, passionate, and wild sex with. That IS me; that is NOT the Texan.I also point out how sex is important to a relationship. Let's refer back to my unrefuted evidence from last round: "Sex is an integral part of any marriage because it ensures the healthy expression of love between two people who plan on being together for the rest of their lives." The Texan says his relationship with YYW was "not based on sex." Mine would not be based on sex either, but at least we would have sex (and lots.) The problem with the Texan is that to have a healthy marriage, he and YYW must, in fact, have sex. The Texan never refutes that he would neither enjoy nor want to have sex with YYW. Thus, their relationship is doomed from the start.The Texan also never refutes that I would be better at pleasing YYW than he would. The Texan CANNOT even be physically attracted to YYW.Also, I don't have blog, and, if I could access the website the Texan cites, I'd explain why whoever it is he's referring to is not, in fact, me. I will include a photo of me at the end of this debate, just to settle any question re: my appearance.We *all* know the Texan is 5'7" -- which just goes to show how much Royal exaggerates. I am 6'1", which fits within YYW's parameters.PERSONALITYI think we can prefer a medical study to Paula Abdul. I would also like to point out now that if YYW marries the Texan, YYW will be subjected to the Texan's unending rolodex of annoying songs, including Stephen by Ke$ha and Cotton-Eyed Joe (and you thought Vanilla Ice was bad...). Let us also remember that in R1 the Texan advocated for Slytherin-Slytherin marriage. This is equivalent to advocating for a "Like-to-Like" marriage. Thus, his own logic defeats him. Likes attract.The Texan again insists that YYW is a Slytherin, which is patently false. YYW is a Gryffindor through and through. In other words, the Texan is refusing to accept YYW for who he is, and is in complete denial. I am much more emotionally stable, and so I would be a better husband.In fact, YYW and I do disagree. We recently disagreed about DDO's TOS policy and banning. So, we will have plenty of things to debate. But, again, our personalities are similar in a way that only happens once in a blue moon. It's like the cosmos arranged for us to be together. On the Myers-Briggs test, for example, our scores matched 87.5%. We also both appreciate the same type of underwear, which is vital to any successful gay relationship.The evidence is literally overwhelming: YYW and I have highly compatible personalities. Therefore, we'd have a successful union.I think, in that last paragraph in this section, the Texan is referring not to be, but to himself. Unlike straight guys, after a long day of work I would come home, may a gourmet dinner for two with lit candles and reduced lighting, and organize an incredibly romantic dinner for YYW. Then, after some foreplay lasting several hours, we would spend some miraculous time in bed. I would give total devotion. INTERESTSI misspelled Gryffindor only because I was mesmerized by my love of YYW and his beauty. Unfortunately, the Texan will never have that experience since he cannot feel physically attracted to YYW's beauty, the curves of his body, the sensual...(trails off for 150 minutes about YYW's majestic appearance). I am also interested in law school and politics, and have named more similar interests with YYW than has the Texan.CON's FALLACIOUS CASEC1: Gay MarriageAgain, the Texan fails to show causality. He and YYW could easily like in the Northeast, where YYW is from, instead of in Texas. At which point, Con's argument is totally moot. Secondly, legality by court decision does not imply a Supreme Court case. For example, in New Jersey, the highest court in the State legalized gay marriage there. Again, the Texan's point fails to take into account most possibility. Ultimately, I doubt that YYW voting up the Con world will actually cause Gay Marriage to be legalized in Texas.C2: How to VoteYYW is a big, fluffy dog person, and the Texan just doesn't realize it. As a dog-lover, YYW should vote down the cat on principle. The Texan's image is certainly "unique"...if you find oddly bizarre an appealing look.Moreover, I recognize that the Phantom Menace is not the best of the Star Wars Trilogy--my contention is just that it is not among the worst. And, Jar Jar is a complete idiot...My name could also be announced as "bash" meaning party or celebration [3]. It can also mean to smash things...like during sex ;) "Thett3" is just a mouthful...Clearly, 1 means first place. First place is better than third. Moreover, using 1 I can say: "YYW, 1 love you!" Con drops that YYW would never vote on a paradigm put forth by someone names LaissezFaire.C3: BetterI got 100 on 4 tests over the past week. Clearly, I am superior. A. God-like Powers I implanted an image of the Texan burning in your mind. This was my doing--I was showing you his destruction. But, I can also implant other images as evidence of my power.You will see a purple flower. You will see a bee on that flower. You will see a pink elephant. You will see the elephant pick up the flower. Voila! The Texan's powers are non-unique.Con never refutes that I am indeed El-Aurian, which gives my a unique range of mystical powers!As for the Muppets' Card, clearly, I am not Whoopi Goldberg. However, I should receive credit for finding a way to cite the Muppets (who are awesome) in a debate round.B. HotnessCleary Royal still carries the proverbial torch for the Texan, and as such is an unreliable witness.Furthermore, Royal is renowned for her ability to become easily inflamed. Were she to find out that YYW and the Texan were together, her wrath would turn upon YYW. I'm sure YYW does not walk to become the victim of a psychopathic stalker.For his own personal safety, YYW must vote Pro. C. SlytherinYYW is not a Slytherin, unless the Texan is comparing him to d!ckbags like Lucius Malfoy. Gryffindor and Ravenclaw have empirically successful relationships, whereas Slytherin and Gryffindor...total fail. D. Older I'm a "young nooblet?" I think the Texan is truly missing how much time I put into DDO and how much of that is spent talking to YYW. I would never leave him!C4: HistoryI say again over: I don't think YYW wants to be a Republican (there are reasons why he left); nor do I think he wants to run for office.C5: ReligionUmmm...I would abandon the faith of my forefathers to be with the man I LOVE! I am like Chava, willing to give up my faith for my beloved Fyedka! This shows true devotion.Pope Francis is also far more open to gays and to civil unions than Con thinks [4]. It might just be possible to change the Catholic Church, which would be a far more impressive feat that changing the GOP. The Texan also changes the goal posts here! He initially said that we should reject papism because it is anti-gay. Under than logic, we should also reject the GOP. Now, he says we should reject it because it is more anti-gay than the GOP. #logicalfallacies Oh, and I promised you an image of me...here it is: [CENSORED BY DDO ELITE: TOO HOT FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION]SOURCEShttp://www.youtube.com...1 - http://www.debate.org...2 - http://www.debate.org...3 - http://dictionary.reference.com...4 - http://swampland.time.com... YYW - Marry Me!