The Australian education system should united and be the same level as the Nsw education system

It appears that a misunderstanding of the topic has approached. Pro has actually put forth TWO resolutions in his first round. To quote for the second time round:His first resolution: "I will try to prove that Australian education should be same throughout the nation" (the resolution that I followed). His SECOND resolution (put forth more clearly in the 4th round): "The Australian education system should united and be the same level as the Nsw education system" (Grammar mistake)Unfortunately, in the second round, Pro has agreed with me when I defined the topic as:The Australian education should be the same throughout the entire nationI (con) is arguing that the education should remain the same throughout the entire nation and pro is arguing that it should not be the same. Perhaps it would have been better for Pro to have made it more clear what the actual resolution was for his “pathetic and foolish” opponent? Pro, can you make the resolution of this debate clearer? I’d advise you have a look at the way I set it out in R1. If you made it as clear as that, none of these misinterpretations would have ever happened. I hope our voters will take into account Pro’s lack of efforts to even make his resolution clear AND the fact that he pointed it out in the second last round. I would also ask of my opponent to try and keep a more civilised tongue when debating and not use words such as "truly terrible and pathetic at researching strong refrences" (another typo by pro! ). With pro’s actual arguments, and some research, I have only discovered that he actually LIED. Readers, beware of his arguments. He tells us that the information from the PISA is defective. LIE. Pro doesn’t realise that everybody does the same test so the results are perfectly valid. I would recommend to pro to have a look at these sites [1] [2]. Pro has put forth an argument that he himself hasn’t understood properly. Truly, a lack of effort displayed. Quoting Pro: 'Firstly the main reason why australia education system should be united to make all student equally learned'Equally learned? Is pro mad? He directly contradicts this with his argument about the GAT and the fact that it's plain stupid. This is also a ridiculous suggestion that is IMPOSSIBLE to implement. It is not possible to restrict the education of those people who are excelling in their studies just to equalise with those of a lower standard. Perhaps Pro should look at this idea in a much broader point of view. If every student in Australia was equally learned, who should become a McDonald’s cashier and who should become a neuro-surgeon when they grow up? Oh wait, I forgot! I am a pathetic opponent who has been “struggling in your education endavour”(Endeavour? ). Pro seems to think of himself as superior to me, yet he even contradicts himself in a single argument! “Hunger for education and success via fierce determination and burning desire is the key to success and all challenges in life. We humans have the capacity to achieve marvellous things as long as we never quit, donot accept no or harsh words, have fierce determination, are willing to work hardwork and have a burning desire we can achieve the impossible. ” Pro here has given us a truly insightful quote for those who are studying in schools or universities. It shines us a light for those who have big goals in life. However, how is this related to the topic? I thought we were arguing on the education in Australia; you thought we were arguing about the education system in Australia, but now you provide us a quote that is not related to either one’s topics. “Con, one advice please donot come up with the arguements that students will struggle”(Spelling errors) Thank you pro for requesting it. I was running out of space, so we can let the readers keep in mind about that argument about students that will struggle within schools. That argument remains conceded. 'So are all the GAT students in Australia equally smart ? Yes and NoYes, Because if GAT students from NSW travel elsewhere theystillwill remain GATas theyStudy the hardest education system but No for all the rest of The Gat students' Does Pro even know what “smart” means? [3] Smart: Having or showing quick-witted intelligence. One should note that Intelligence happens to be both heritable as well as environmental. To state that an education system actually alters a HERITABLE characteristic is simply outrageous. A similar logic is to say that education can alter your eye colour. “Where would find smart students in Australia? NSW, ACT or VICI vote for NSW as i donot know of students that are smarter or of equivalent intelligence of the students in James Ruse Agricultural High school. ” This goes to show Pro’s clear lack of preparation for this debate. Is NSW truly the state with best-achieving students or not? Why should the entire nation imitate the education system of NSW if it isn’t the best? Althoug NAPLAN is an "easy test" it is one of the most accurate testing systems that are used to assess the education of students within the entire nation. It is a very accurate way to make a comparison with the academic achievements of students within Australia. Arguments: Cost of uniting: Maybe it is time for pro to have a consideration of the cost of uniting the entire education SYSTEM in Australia as one. The amount of time and money it will take for all the teachers to be retrained to be able to teach as one is simply ridiculous. As well as that, with all the teachers out at training for at least a year or so, the education within the schools no longer exists. The teachers are gone but students must continue learning. To clarify things before pro even bothers to suggest the idea of substitute teachers, there simply will not be enough to cover all the teachers within the entire nation. Why adopt the NSW education system? : Pro did say that he wished to change the education system for the “good of the nation”. A simple question for Pro, why should we mimic the education system of NSW, when there are other systems far superior than those of NSW. Compare the education levels of a South Korean to an Australian [4]. Why didn’t Pro at least choose an education system that is better than all systems provided in Australia? Conclusion: The education system in Australia should remain the same. No changes in the education system within any states in Australia should be made. The education in all the states in Australia should progress at their own speed. It is not necessary for all the states to unite to form one education system for “the better of the nation”. References: . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://www.pisa.oecd.org... . https://www.google.com.au... . http://www.guardian.co.uk...