Halo 3 is better than Call of Duty 4.

On that note. .. I begin. .. OVERVIEW: My opponent seems to be intent on saying that I can't speak for all people, well. .. I don't have to. Debate is a clash of opinions and as my opponent has been intent on putting the burden of proof on me, CON also has a burden of proof as well. Him being CON, he has to prove that COD 4 is better than Halo 3 (or at least that they are equal). .. As this has not yet been proven, you must look towards the PRO in this debate. I. Here is where my overview takes full effect. My opponent has not met his burden of proof. I have shown my personal opinions (and real world effects) towards playing the two games. It's not much, BUT it IS more than my opponent has offered. He has hardly put arguments toward why COD 4 is great and why Halo 3 is bad AND has NOT compared the two. As of now, my opinion is the only real world affects put into this round and I think Halo 3 is better than COD 4. As my opinion can't be changed, it is the only actual "evidence" presented in this round. NOTE: Any other evidence or opinion presented in the final round must be seen as abusive and unacceptable in this debate. Sorry Kappler :( II. When looking at the advancement of the two games (as argument "II" does), you will see Halo's as begin greater. COD 1 is arguably one of the greater of the COD series. Halo (1) was the great break through. HOWEVER, if you compare the advancement of the two game series, you will see that if you go from playing Halo 3 to Halo (1), that you will want to go back to Halo 3. However with COD, you will probably like the original better. The advancement to the 360 was great, the game play is still as amazing as ever. And something that COD can never claim, is the "originalness" that Halo has to offer. They are able to offer alien weaponry (specifically the plasma grenade) that COD can't even begin to dream of. Halo CAN be unrealistic because of its story. COD IS current warfare, which is its downfall when compared to the Halo series. There are maps on Halo 3, such as the one where you fly across the map, that COD 4 can't even dream of. If you look at it, COD 4 is just a bunch of buildings in different environments that make it EXTREMELY repetitive. Even if you get sick of the advanced (over the top) maps, you still have your basic maps and basic guns to enjoy. In other words, Halo 3 has it all. Better maps, better graphics, better campaign mode (which really hasn't been argued but it does), better character abilities (such as jumping higher and "lunging" farther), and MUCH better game play. It's just better. .. III. Let's get this straight, EVEN if Bungie went against what it originally said and DID make another game, people wouldn't care. They would just be excited to get more advances in a GREAT game. People get excited for a new COD game, but they come out so often and they are all so similar that people don't care. Look at the advances between each Halo, they are so great of advances that you can ACTUALLY tell the difference between each game. If you were to take 100 average gamers and have them randomly play each of the Halo's and each of the COD games, they would EASILY be able to tell the difference between the Halo games but the COD games are so similar that it's just not worth it. In conclusion, I leave with a statement that you said in your 2nd round. .. "but im sure when the first Halo came out everyoen couldnt wait for the second. Thank you for a good debate Mr. Kappler and I hope to debate you again.