Creationism is unjustifiable pt2

Alright let me produce the crux of my argument in a way that is simple and not to wordy. You have attempted to say that Creationism is unjustifiable. I have in turn suggested that since you have not defined what 'Creationism' is that it is open to reasonable interpretation according to ones own understanding of the act of Creation. You suggest that the Creationism is not possible, I postulate the exact opposite and that based on science itself the creation and manipulation of a planet is possible. Point of fact, every single 'Theory' you have expressed simply adds to the foundation of knowledge that a BEING of some sort, call it what you will... COULD create a planet and institute life upon said world through use of scientific principle. Let me postulate further that as mankind continues to evolve in its own knowledge of science. What would stop us from taking on that same kind of role? I believe you have a very misguided understanding of what God and the act of Creation is. That is not to say I myself do not disagree with MANY people out there spouting how Creation occurred, however this is in no way means that it did not occur, and in point of fact returning to the first chapter of Genesis since honestly that is all I can use as reference material that is not 'suspect' in terms of rebuttal it fits with the CURRENT THEORETICAL EVIDENCE of how the world was formed and brought about life. You say that Creationism is UNJUSTIFIABLE I again state that it is not UNJUSTIFIABLE rather that it depends on your understanding of the nature of God and that is an entirely different set of metrics you must thereby measure your argument against. Do you not find it extraordinary that a people 3,000 years ago basically nailed the process whereby this planet was formed and Initiated life? That our scientist rather than finding that these things are untrue only add to the scientific body of evidence that it occurred almost exactly as written? Once again bear in mind the brevity of the chapter, the cultural understanding of the people, and the loss of knowledge as to direct versus interpreted understanding in today's world and language. Since a Being ( lets call him God ) could organize a planet using scientific principle i.e. natural sciences, your postulation that Creationism is unjustifiable is not true. Rather SOME postulations of Creationism are unjustifiable. But then many scientist create postulations that are later discredited over the course of time, that is simply the nature of understanding. Would you throw out the entire concept of evolution simply because one scientists suggest that the fossilized remains of a 'prehistoric' man turn out to be a cousin rather than a direct descendant? Of course not. I fear I have become too wordy, sorry, and I also fear I am beating a dead horse, ( I apologize to the horse though if indeed it is dead I suppose it does not care ) but rather than attempt to discuss the actual center of my argument that the story of Creation in Genesis is accurate you have attempted to bait me into playing a discredit science game, of which I have not and still do not believe is correct for my God is a God of Science. Hence why discredit something that is unworthy of discredit. That does not mean that I think evolutionary theory has figured everything out ( else why continue to study it ) I am all for the concept and idea that evolution has occurred, you have not scored any points there, move on and explain where I am wrong in saying that the way Genesis describes the creation of the world is incorrect and thereby unjustifiable bearing in mind that portions of it may be out of order.