Right and wrong is perception

Though this debate was fun, there are some holes in my opponents case. I will first point this out and explain why pro should win this debate. "Yes, the perception of right and wrong can be subjective. But morality cannot be subjective. "In this sentence my opponent is affirming that right and wrong is a perception by saying. .. " the perception of right and wrong" he agrees with my case. I believe pro should win because of this but I will continue because i dont want to base debates on concurrence alone. Morality-of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical:. http://dictionary.reference.com...alsThis portion alone proves my case but lets move along shall we?1. Morality"Am I suggesting that Atheists are wrong for not believing in God? "It's extremely awkward you say this because you yourself said the bible contains myths. Why should people believe in a god of myths? There are many myths. Why should we believe in god when the information that we get about god is a myth as you claim? How is it logical to believe in something of witch the source is a myth. When the roots of a tree are proven to not exist it is then logical to say that there is no tree, or at least that the rest of the tree will soon die. Unless a tree has strong roots then we cannot assume that there are leaves, branches,etc. .. because trees start off as branches. "There is, strong evidence pointing towards his existence"With the comment you just made above you yourself have proven the nonexistent of god. Lets not debate about god anymore because god arguments arnt to resolution related because even without god we still can exercise moral decisions? "That being said, God has given us a set of rules to live a good life, and whether or not some people believe in them or not, doesn't matter. Common sense suggests them to be true. "Just because my teachers or parents give me a rule doesnt mean that they make sense, or it's logical, or that it's common sense. I have a question. If god gave us the same universal rules to follow via common sense they why do people have differing opinions on right and wrong in the first place. If god created right and wrong. Then how can a person who is viewed as being wrong by majority of our society still feel that they are right? Example, gay marriage. If god said it's wrong then why do they feel there right? "The survey of 4,013 adults in August shows that 49 percent say that homosexuality is morally wrong, 9 percent morally acceptable and 35 percent say it is not a moral issue. ". .. .. .. .. .. .. http://www.opposingviews.com... "You cannot argue that murder, rape and thievery are morally just. "Let me make very clear that this depends on a persons perception of right and wrong.1. Murder. Apparently majority of Americans support murder judging on the presence of the second amendment. The only reasons people use guns is to potentially murder. There is also the situation with our military. Since we need to protect our country murder is then justified. As we can see in this situation right and wrong is a perception.2. Rape- Some husbands feel its ethical to rape there wife's if they don't have sex with them. Why? Because they believe that when they get married that each party is obligated to have sex. Like I said right and wrong is a perception.3. Robbery- Maybe a mothers baby has gone 6 days without formula or milk, wouldn't you rob for your dieing baby? I would. We can also see here that right and wrong is a perception. "Our world as we know it couldn't exist without free will, so God gave it to us. "This isnt logical whatsoever. As we know logic gets you from A to Z. Witch this fails to do. This world could exist without freewill. The god you believe in could have just programmed us to do these things. Also we cannot base the existence of god on humans having freewill. That's like saying sense cotton exists then pillows exist. Not logical because pillows can be stuffed with other things than just cotton. Lastly he is once again basing his arguments on the assumption that god exists witch cannot be proven. So Please drop the god argument.3. Reasons Morality is indisputableI have already defeated this idea earlier with one of your synonymous quotes. Thus I see no reason to do it again. I do want to say one thing though. "There is no malice intended when you're killing someone to defend yourself. " We hunted and premeditated bin ladens murder with malice and forethought but majority of Americans feel it was justified. This phenomenon so-say can only be logically explained if right and wrong is based on ones perspective and perception.4. Are humans naturally good? Pollutionextinction of animalsIf we are naturally good then why do we do these things witch by majority are considered bad? ConclusionAs we can see right and wrong is a perception. My opponent even agrees with me on this. My opponent never really tackled my example of the villager burning witches and feeling justified about it. Cultural taboos are only differing cultures perceptions on things. I have defeated my opponents god arguments and any other arguments he had. I have also proved my points being. .. .. .. .1. Morality is subjective. 2. Even if morality was objective, right and wrong is still a perception. I have proven my points with opinions V's morality. I have also justified rape, murder, and robberies. My ability to even do this suggests that right and wrong is based on perception. No matter how one puts it all decisions we make are based on the information we receive via our senses witch is our perception. Thus right and wrong is based on perception.