Advertising Cigarettes should be banned

Haha i don't see your points? I think your the confused one here, i am the one who pointed out the blatant contradiction in your second argument that you failed to correct, address, or even mention. (See my opening second argument). Also, your are the one who, again, has not refuted any of my arguments. And you are the one who has changed arguments 3 different times, without responding to your previous ones. just to give some evidence of this, you mentioned in your first argument that government should ban the adds, "to prevent lung cancer or what have they." i gave five points against this arguments, and in your second arguments you simply tried to give a whole new argument by saying, "it will and shall diminish the increase of young people to go out in the market, but a pack of cigarettes and smoke it even though they know they do not know how to" unfortunately you failed to give proof to this statement, or any logical reasoning. Then i proceeded to show how other factors contribute to people smoking and it isn't a matter of the advertising. Again you didn't respond. Now in your third argument you tell me i have ignored your point of people's voices being heard. So let me refute this point. People do not have the right to use the government to ban, or limit a private enterprise. When this happens it is called fascism. I am not arguing the fact that people's voices shouldn't be heard, but there are other alternatives to banning smoking adds. There are many anti-smoking commercials, groups to help quit, groups to make the awareness of disease more prevalent, search google and the majority of sights that come up are anti smoking. So obviously the people's voices are being heard. Its just that when they use the government to control private business, it becomes fascism. so in review you have given two rational to why the these adds should be banned. So i would like to go over them. Smoking is unhealthy -Yes, but in advertisements, it is required to say that it is unhealthy. -government cannot ban everything that is unhealthy, which you would be giving them the power to do(see my first argument) -there are many other causes of a desire to smoke, that provide a much larger influence on naive people, therefore the government ban would be an unnecessary abuse of power. second: the people need to be heard. -i have shown how the people have other means of being heard -private enterprise is not publicly owned -there are already limits on advertisements and just some more points in general: The banning of these ads would violate freedom of speech. and probably the most important point is that you have failed completely to provide proof connecting a smoking advertisement ban with a decrease in the smoking rate. Only once you can prove this, can you begin to make an argument, because everything in your argument depends on this being true. unfortunately, again, you failed to do so, and i have shown why it is false. -illegal drugs are illegal in and of themselves, not just the advertisements, yet still continue to be a major problem. -the ban on alcohol(prohibition)failed to significantly reduce the use. -other factors are a much larger contributor to young smokers(peer pressure, and lifestyle)