Cyber bullying isn't really that big of an issue

Ok so I want to start this off by pointing out that my opponent's conduct has been horrible as of late. My opponent has practically yelled in response to me, insulted my credibility, and taken my statistics the wrong way then yelled about it. As such I will strive to stay better than that standard of conduct my opponent has set for himself.1. Statistics."But 20% of people who use social media(kids) do not commit suicide. Even though the "statistics" claim that 20% of kids do commit suicide. Now by kids they're referring to anyone between ages 11-12. But I know actual experience that, 20% of kids DON'T commit suicide."So that is not what the 20% statistic said which proves you did not spend enough time to read it carefully. The statistic was that 20% of kids who are cyberbullied think about suicide. Not actually commit it. So you clearly did not read the point carefully and missed it."So they're saying that 1 in 5 kids commit suicide because of cyber bullying? What complete idiotic crap. If that WAS the case, then CNN or some other news channel would've already reported this by now."First this is a fine example of some of the conduct my opponent has done on display here. "Complete idiotic crap" is not appreciated. Also yelling at me "WAS" isn't either. Also, suicide rates are not idiotic, and while I will admit that the suicide rates are a little tricky to understand in this evidence piece, you cannot just dismiss my point as idiotic crap."I just wanted to point this out but you actually read the article wrong. It didn't say that 4500 kids commit suicide because of cyber bullying. It just said that 4500 kids commit suicide in general"I apologize you are absolutely right that it did not specify cyberbullying as the cause of the 4500. However according to this source, " 1 in 100,000 children ages 10 to 14 die by suicide each year. (NIMH) 7 in 100,000 youth ages 15 to 19 die by suicide each year. (NIMH) 12.7 in 100,000 young adults ages 20-24 die by suicide each year. (NIMH)" http://www.save.org... Now clearly this is a much larger number than 4500 if you multiply it by the 100ks in the population. Also it involves more than just 11-12 year olds. So my educated guess, is that 4500 of these several thousand suicides by kids, most likely are due to Cyberbullying and the numbers are not unrelated. I would encourage my opponent to provide a source on this in order to respond correctly.2. The reach of cyberbullying."Also I know that cyber bullying has become a very large part of the internet. But people have honestly learn to just live with it."Two things, first my opponent conceded the entire merit of my point. Second, my opponent has issue with the mental ability of some folks to handle cyberbullies. This is A) unsympathetic to their suffering, and B) uneducated of an opinion. Sometimes cyberbullying leads to depression, which is not something one can simply mentally push through without some thoughts of suicide. As such, there is no reason to believe that cyberbullying should be ignored because the problem is large. My point still stands."Heck, I honestly wondered if you ever played CS:GO."I have not because I have a life.3. Cyberbullying as a source."To be honest, I didn't even think you've even ever heard of leafyishere."This is a direct attack on my credibility. An ad hominem. Also it is a dumb argument. So I should win conduct and arguments on this one. Here is why the argument is dumb. If I didn't know who leafyishere was, then why would I know the channel name? I didn't hear of it from someone else, which must mean I have watched some of his videos."Now, I think you SERIOUSLY over exaggerated about leafy "relentlessly and ruthlessly destroy his subject in a verbal assault." Now most of the people he does videos about actually kind of deserve to be criticized. Most of dumb are honestly completely ridiculous. His videos are mostly for comedic purposes."Now there are a couple things wrong with this. First, I don't think I over exaggerated how bad leafy was. He is pretty terrible of a person, and he knows that his videos can ruin YouTubers lives yet he keeps doing his roasting videos anyway. He could go back to his stories videos (which were much better honestly), yet the fact that he doesn't proves how horrible he is.Second, the only person I ever thought needed criticizing from Leafy was Keemstar. That was it. I would ask my opponent to prove with evidence some people who deserved leafy's criticism, and for the voters to be able to decide for themselves. Finally, Leafy is not dumb, and he clearly has got more than just comedy in mind. Sometimes he does succeed at comedy, but rarely."Leafy even calls himself a cyber bully."He sure does, but does that make it ok? Of course not.Also a quick note. The fact that you think Leafy is hilarious, proves that cyberbullying has become a sport."Yah they kinda can. Unless it's actually well deserved criticism, then they can just ignore it because most of the time cyber bullying is literally just insulting someone with cuss words or saying absolutely false crap that nobody with a brain would agree with."You didn't read my point. My point was, over the internet it is harder to ignore someone than it is in real life. You still have not responded to that yet."WHAT. THAT'S NOT CYBER BULLYING. THAT'S CALLED BREAKING THE LAW. CYBER BULLYING ISN'T PHYSICAL AND MUCH LESS WOULDN'T INVOLVE EXPLODING SOMEONES PHONE."Whoa, no need to shout. You knew exactly what i meant, and if you didn't get the idiom, then that is your problem."Then just ignore it again. Eventually the cyber bully well just get bored"Ok hold on. I have brought up evidence that highly suggests cyberbullies continue to harass to the point that the people they communicate with wish to block off contact. If that is the case, then clearly one cannot easily ignore a cyberbully. This point still stands."Ok look, I'm not a cruel warlock and I do know that people die for this and I'm really sad that they did."You have been quite insenstitive to me up until now, so why should I believe you are sad that these people committed suicide?"But look, I also understand that some people have very sensitive emotions and can be damaged by the slightest things, but if your going to go into the internet. Then you should've already prepared."And what you are suggesting, is ignoring the problem and letting it fester in cesspools around the internet. Is that even a solution worth being proud of? Or would we all rather be the ones who said we stomped down cyberbullying. I would rather be in the second category."Because cyber bullying is pretty much everywhere around the internet. It's impossible to avoid it. Cyber bullying is embarrassingly, a HUGE part of internet."And by this entire quote, you 100% concede with and agree with my point that Cyberbullying is a problem that cannot be ignored. So this debate should end with a vote for Con.Eagerly awaiting my opponents next arguments.-42