Evolution is a fact.

Don't be sorry for having a long post. I'd much rather have a long post then a short one gives me more to read and think about. I will call my original argument 0) for better organization. 0)There are around 3 billion base pairs in human and other primates DNA; rats have slightly less at around 2.75 billion base pairs, fish also have a few billion base pairs. Most retroviruses are made up of a few base pairs but can make up a few hundred plus. http://www.genome.gov... The odds of humans and, chimps sharing 3, endogenous retroviruses in the exact same locations, 2 with gorillas 2 with orangutans, 3 with gibbons 2 with old world monkeys and 2 with new world monkeys and also sharing 1 with rats and 1 with fish are ridiculously high. So the odds are 1 in 1,805,420,000,000,000,000,000billion that evolution is not a fact. http://www.freerepublic.com... Math: 1/3billion x (add x 1/3billion by 42 times) x 1/2.75b x 1/2b These odds also don't take into account that the retroviruses did not inject their full genome into humans, primates etc., they were only able to inject part of it. This also doesn't include the fact that several of the retroviruses are viruses that we are familiar with and to our knowledge they only infect new world monkeys not humans yet we share this endogenous retrovirus with new world monkeys in the exact same place in our genome. 1)Whales were first land dwelling animals that then evolved into sea dwelling animals. So whales breathed originally with lungs but then moved to the oceans and evolved better swimming appendages. Also there are some fish that don't have lungs but can still live on land. http://uk.reuters.com... Also there are fish that have legs. http://en.wikipedia.org... There is a downfall to having both gills and lungs it takes up food resources and would require two types of processes to distribute oxygen. All animals don't have all the same traits because there are different environments; animals living in a desert needs different traits then one living in the ocean. Stick an armadillo in water and all a sudden its hard back causes it to fall to the bottom of the ocean were it drowns. 2)This law only applies to complex life. Humans have already been able to show how non-living organic material can replicate and eventually evolve into something that has all of life's traits. (this is sourced down below in a different section) 3)Your first quotation doesn't even include any arguments against evolution all it is, is some guy ranting and throwing attacks, he doesn't even say which part of evolution he disagrees with. Also Ill mention that this quote and all quotes afterwards are using the bandwagon logical fallacy, but even if you use the bandwagon fallacy I'd still win given that 99% of all scientists living today in the 21 century agree with me. Second quotation. Considering that punctuated equilibrium has an explanation I'd say this quote is completely irrelevant and incorrect. 4)Evolution has nothing to do with the origins of life, it has to do with how life changes and evolves over time; meaning this section of yours is completely irrelevant. However you're incorrect humans have already created these proteins and other molecules that are key to life just by dumping compounds in with other compounds (meaning humans didn't directly create these proteins they showed how they would be created in nature all on their own). http://news.bbc.co.uk... http://www.sciencedaily.com... http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...