In defense of evil part 1: The Unabomber was justified in his actions.

‘’ The unabomber wasn't trying to send a political message. He declared war on the industrial-technological society that we've already established is causing extreme harm to the planet and it's inhabitants man and animal alike’’ He had a set of ideas that he believed in political can be defined as ‘’ motivated by a person’s beliefs or actions ‘’ he clearly believed in what he was doing therefore it can be regarded as a political statement. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com... ‘’These weren't innocent men he went after. Even if they were innocent, why is their well being more important than the billions of other people living on this planet. Kaczynski was a mathematician. He got out his pencil and paper ( no calculators he was against technology) and did the math. The math said sacrificing 26 but only 3 fully, to save billions was a good bet. I will get to how Kaczynski chose how targets after the rebuttals.’’ ‘’ to save billions was a good bet’’ You have provided no evidence to suggest his actions would save billions of people. I would like to point out since industrialisation of the world the average life expectancy has increased year on year worldwide this is down to improvements in medicine and our understanding of the world we live in this directly contradicts your unproven argument. http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com... You first state that ’These weren't innocent men he went after’ and then change to ‘Even if they were innocent’ this is a direct contradiction on your part. ‘’why is their wellbeing more important then the billions of other people living on this people’’ ok so you think it is ok for one man to play god and take people’s lives in order to make a statement about the way we live ?. Let me ask you would you still have the same view if your mother, farther, brother or sister had been blown to pieces by a man who deemed their life insignificant compared to the masses. ‘’ Not all strong views would motivate the acts of war the unabomber carried out. Not all strong views are justified in going to war, but the unabomber's views were’’ People thought history have convinced themselves that going to war or starting a war is just rather than sitting down to discuss differences and reach valid logical solutions. Far too many people resort to violence and murder to resolve differences let’s look at his goals as you stated he wanted to stop/revers the industrialisation of the world. How was sending bombs to kill people ever going to change public opinion and help him achieve his goals ? Blowing innocent people up is going to alienate the public form the ideas you support , surely he would have been better using established political channels as I stated in the previous round. ‘’ It's interesting to note that the source con cited when writing of Osama Bin Laden ‘’ I will not accept advise on sources from anyone who deems wikipedia as a valid reliable source. ‘’This is a false analogy fallacy[1]. Bin Ladens actions in no way resemble Kazynski's. They had completely different motivations and their tactics were different also as well as their targets.’’ Both men killed innocent people to promote their ideas. They both killed innocent people to send their own message. Bin Ladens actions and that of the Unabomber are very similar in principle. If you defend the Unabombers right to low people up the you also defend Bin Ladens as you cannot have double standards. ‘’ The system can't be reformed’’. People in south African never thought There would be a black president however nelson Mandela used the political system to change the opinion of a nation political systems are at the key to reform our society anything is achievable. http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu... ‘’ Effectively brain washing the public[2]. The democratic process would not be a valid way for Kaczynski to overthrow the industrial-technological society.’’ Democratic process gives power to the people and lets us decide who run the country. Kaczynski took it on himself to try to take that right from all of us and force his ideas on all of us. A political campaign that is voted for by the people is the only way to change the world . ‘’Some Enemy combatants killed or maimed by Unabomber. Notice all of them are tied to or were directly involved in furthering this system. 1. Percy Wood president of united Airline. 2.Diogenes Angelakos engineering. 3.Hugh Scrutton- owner of a computer store. 4. Gary Wright- computer store owner.’’ You brand an engineer and a couple of people who own a store. People who go to work to provide for their family an enemy. These people turned up for work one day and here lives were never the same again because some mentally disturbed nutter decided that they were an enemy this cannot be just. ‘’ There is a natural/god given right to revolution.’’ There is also a commandment that states thou shall not murder. No matter what country or religion you are part of no one has the right to kill another human being. To Summarise My opponent has failed to meet the burden of proof that the unabombers actions (killing and maiming innocent people) were justified. Democratic proses is far more effective than bombing people into acceptance No country on earth would deem the unabombers actions as justifiable.