god according to the bible would ---never--- use text as a form of communication

See? That's why I truly hate beginners like you who truly know nothing and have to improvise and invent excuses in order for their shiny white be-hinds to make a dent in that atmosphere of Io on a cloudy day. Yah didn't pay any attention to the vides did yah sport? Nope. That's painfully obvious. And on and on yah ramble like a steam power locomotive bull hurling towards a matador's big red cape in the dark, thus becoming black. Now you mention idiot verses from the idiot bible which truly means absolutely nothing. Ziltch. Nada. 0. Zippo. Because what does mean something is the ability to think, reason, rationalize, use common sense and use logic in which case, god, christianity and the bible and obviously you has none. Ready to be pulverized? Taken from vidie #1 since its such a strain for you to watch it... "If god is all knowing and he knows the future of all events and he wrote a book that can only be interpreted as if it endorses slavery and if its heinous violence against your children against your neighbors" how could a god be that omnipotent and devise a book where we can"t distinguish between the law of Israel and god"s law? I mean their interwoven where we have metaphor and fact and nobody can distinguish the two. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take figuratively. We don"t know what we"re supposed to take literally. Was it actually a tree? I mean come on. How can anyone distinguish this. I mean come on. It doesn"t make any sense. It doesn"t matter how its translated. It doesn"t matter what version. If it was written by an omnipotent being there would be ONE VERSION. And there would be only ONE WAY to interpret it because it would be written well." Aron Ra "Actually it wouldn"t be written at all. What"s wrong with your god comin" down and talking to people? "Hey you know some of that stuff that"s in the book? I"m here to correct it." Matt Dillahunty Taken from vidie #2 since obviously you do not have the ability to watch a vidie nor listen to one... "We have to rely on copies of copies of anonymous authors with no originals and the textural testimony to a miracle for example, there"s no amount of reports, anecdotal reports that is sufficient to justify in believing that actually happened as reported. And anything that would qualify as a god would clearly understand this and if it wanted to clearly convey this to people in a way that is believable would not be relying on ---TEXT--- to do so. And this to me is the nail in the coffin for christianity. The god that christians believe in is amazingly ---STUPID---!!! If it actually wants to achieve its goal by spreading its word to humanity by relying on text, by relying on languages that die off, by relying on anecdotal testimony, that"s not a pathway to truth. And anything that would qualify for a god would know this.which shows either god does not exist or doesn"t care enough about the people to understand the nature of evidence to actually present it. Now which of those two possibilities is accurate?" Matt Dillahunty "If jesus and Muhammad and abraham and moses had never been born, which in any case I tend to dabble, if all their stories were untrue were suddenly found and everyone had to admit it some people I know would show panic. Now what would we do? We"d have no morals suddenly. What could be more nonsensical than that? As the matter of fact the position that we occupy would---be---precisely---the---same as it is now if none of these texts had ever been written, as if none of these lacerations had ever been made. We would still have to reason together about how how to treat one another, about how to build a just city, and about how to have irony and a sense of humor." Christopher Hitchens All 3 of those quotes are 100% correct no matter which verses you idiotically apply which has 0 implications as god would NEVER use text as a source of communication, toe worst form of communication to god. NOTHING is established in scripture. That"s because the christian god, if remotely intelligent in which he is clearly not, would never use text as a source of communication, the worst form of communication possible so everybody can get it wrong. There"s translations upon translations upon translations upon translations upon copies upon copies upon copies upon copies upon dead languages upon dead languages with absolutely 0% of a chance to trance it back to the original. So absolutely nobody knows if they are interpreting correctly. And that my friend includes YOU! So you can continue this charade if you want to. But I think you know better. And while you are at it, you'd also have to prove that YOUR god even exists to be stupid enough to communicate in text form, the worst form of communication possible to a printed god only, as no one, not one person has ---ever--- been able to prove that this god of the bible even exists.