RoyalPaladin is Awesome

Framework He claims that my case is false because it presumes that logic is logical and then asserts that it is not. You shouldn't buy this argument at all; it rests on a bare assertion fallacy. He asserts that my case rests on logic without proving this to be true, and he asserts that logic is illogical. The argument is warrantless. He needs to provide warrants before we buy it. Definitions He turns topicality and concedes that his arguments are nontopical. He then tells you that I have the BoP. This is false. When we say something is average, we give reasons as to why it is average/mediocre (which means average). When we say something is awesome, we just exclaim "GASP! THAT'S AWESOME!" without any rational justification. So, the BoP rests entirely on him to prove that the spaceship is mediocre/average. If he cannot, I win the debate because we presume that it is awesome. He defines "is" as island according to a porn site. He's changing his source here. Accept his previous source because that was the one he posted first. In addition, my Bunny says that "is" is not an island (he knows because he has conquered the whole world.). Since my Bunny said it, it must be true. If you don't believe me, just look at the Bunny porn source that my opponent provided. He then says that his nonexistent source is best because izbo said it. The problem is that he drops the argument I haven't yet made about how my Bunny knows everything because he has conquered the universe. Insofar as this is true, and my Nonexistent Source says he is wrong about everything because my Bunny says so, all of his definitions are wrong and you accept mine. I love my Bunny <3 AP1 He tells you that I hired him in order to humanize myself and make myself more appealing. That's nonsense. First, you can extend the dropped source that I provided that explicitly notes that he was hired by LDF in exchange for a week's access to her toes (so he can lick da toes-he has a toe fetish: yuck). I don't need to hire him to make myself more attractive because 1. I am totally hawt and guys don't care about personality; they only care about physical looks and 2. I have a Bunny and he loves me and I don't need anybody else. <3 He then says I am not cuter because I don't have a pic. Remember from the previous speech that I noted that this is exactly why LDF hired him to attack me. I tied LDF in a cuteness debate without providing a single pic, meaning that my personality alone is cuter than her looks and her personality combined. I am obviously cuter than she is. Plus, I am totally hawt so I am definitely cute :) AP2 Shh, you weren't supposed to tell anybody about our secret relationship! Why would you tell everyone that we are dating? I cannot believe this, BlackVoid. I agreed to be your GF on Facebook but not on DDO. You have to give me back those unscrupulous pics. He accuses me of racism. Do you have a problem with racists, BlackVoid? Just because I am racist doesn't mean that I'm wrong or uncute! He's using ad homs to justify his analysis! He's racist against racists. I am more racist than the average DDO user and am therefore awesome. On a side note, he is ugly because he is a 550 lb. sumo. It has nothing to do with his race. AP3 I discussed how voting for me promotes U.S. heg. His argument is that a bunch of tiny midgets used big words and said that international crises are good. First, my opponent is wrong because he looks like this: http://3.bp.blogspot.com... Second, his source is biased. A midget is defined as "A waste of time for a sexual experience"[1].International crises are good for midgets because in the ensuing chaos they would be able to use their midget powers in order to hypnotize people into thinking that they are not a waste of time for sexual experiences [2]. His source is therefore biased because the organization is only thinking about itself so that it has the opportunity to hop aboard the RoyalPaladin and soar. That's just demeaning. Ignore it and Vote Pro. C1 He first says that nobody knows whether Bunny is good or bad. Who cares as long as I keep him in check? He then says that I contradict AP3 because Bunny is bent on world domination. This is false. Bunny does not need chaos in order to dominate the world (although midgets like BlackVoid do). Bunny is conquering the world through the New World Order. [3] According to Geo, the NWO already has control of the world, so the chaos weakens Bunny's power. I'm not showing my kitty to DDO, BlackVoid. Nice try. He defines it with a false definition in hopes that I show it to DDO to disprove him. That's demeaning. C2 He says my insults can depress people and cause them to kill themselves. Turn this back because it leads to population reduction and therefore curbs the rise of starvation and famines in the future. I am promoting what is good for humanity according to Thomas Malthus. Pro wants people to starve and die. I outweigh in terms of reduction of harms. C3 My opponent is sexist! He says only men can be players! That's wrong! Why can't girls be players too? What's the term for a girl who does the same thing that those men do, huh? Con is sexist because he is promoting sexual double standards. That's an AP reason to vote Pro. C4 He is being racist because he tells you that Nigerians can't live in Alaska. Why? Plus, Alaska is defined as "great place for digging oil". [4] Nigeria happens to be famous for oil exports. Therefore, Nigeria is Alaska and is the location of the igloo. Thus, I am the only person who can build an igloo in Nigeria and am thus awesome. He tells you that I am a mass murderer. Extend the dropped evidence from C2 about how I am promoting population reduction and am therefore reducing harms to humanity. God He tells you that everything we've done has been fallacious. None of my arguments are fallacious, but he admits that his arguments are. Plus, he just committed the tu quoque fallacy. Even if I did use fallacies, it doesn't justify him using them. He turns and says fallacies are good. Sure. That doesn't mean that you extend his arguments though because they are wrong. It was nice of him to give a display of flawed argumentation, but he still admitted that his arguments are false. Sources 1. http://www.urbandictionary.com... 2. http://www.whalliance.com... 3. http://www.urbandictionary.com... 4. http://www.urbandictionary.com...