Miley Cyrus should go back to her home on Whore Island and not do anything on TV for 30 years

*"...fingering yourself with a foam finger..." Dude, you really need to let the foam finger thing go. You say fingering as if she actually put it in her hoo-ha. She caressed herself with it. Big whoop. For the revealing dress vs. underwear thing, Google these names with the term 'skimpy': Rihanna, Lady Gaga, Madonna, Miley Cyrus. Wow, they've all worn similar outfits onstage! *Why didn't you just post a link?* Because it's common sense that skimpy clothing comes with the female pop star territory; it's actually expected at this point. And Miley *did* sing onstage with Thicke, so that point is useless. *"...no one has condemned Lady Gaga or Madonna on the same scale..." Remember when Lady Gaga wore a meat dress? We freaked for a week, then let it go. Remember when Madonna released 'Like a Virgin'? We freaked for a week, then let it go. Remember when Miley danced with Thicke? Huh, see a pattern here? *"...'whoring yourself out' category..." I only said "The exact difference between "being sexy" and "whoring yourself out" is up for debate" because more whorish things have been done in music videos. Go ahead, watch a couple of these. The foam finger thing doesn't seem so bad now, does it? http://whatculture.com... *"...Miley... overstepped the line of what is considered... whorish conduct on television" http://www.thefrisky.com... - Whoo, that took all of five seconds to find. If you think Miley's sexy dance is the most explicit thing on TV these days, you live under a rock. Sex on TV is everything short of nipples and penises. *The hair thing. Again. Sure, it's a dumb haircut, but when the debate is "Should Miley be banned for being a whore?" you are wrong, pure and simple. *"I should punch you in your vagina for saying [Sheen] is even worse then Miley Cyrus...." Oh, I guess I didn't realize I was arguing with a 12-year-old. Lewd insults and applauding Sheen for "being generally awesome" despite the fact that he encourages drug use and essentially gets paid for doing so ("Oh, Sheen has a big stoner fanbase, let's put him in our commercial!"). You do realize this is by far worse than Miley doing a dance, right? "...retard... I clearly meant nobody thinks what she did was ok..." Ooh, more insults! Then don't use the phrase "universally condemned." Bin Laden's actions were "universally condemned." Nixon's Watergate scandal was "universally condemned." Not Miley's skimpy dance. That's ridiculous, and a far worse exaggeration than the Princess Di example I used. *This argument isn't about the Beatles. End of discussion. *"Nobody knows who those last two people are... furthermore Drew Barrymore had a drug problem not a whore problem, and she also had the decency to keep her problems off the stage..." The last two were some of TV's biggest stars (Full House, the Brady Bunch) in their respective decade. I admit that Barrymore's problems were drug related and not so much sex related. But do a bit of research for Barrymore... the entire pop culture world followed her descent, even more so than Britney Spears. Barrymore was *the* child star gone bad: drinking at 11, snorting coke at 13, rehab at 14. And she was followed heavily by paparazzi. Compared to her, Miley *does* look like a goody-two-shoes. *"Con's argument... is basically: 'So what?'" Yeah. You hit the nail on the head. "So what?" Yeah, Miley's acting kind of whorish. But even with the foam finger thing, the underwear onstage, the dirty dancing, she's hardly breaking new ground. It's like you're trying to ignore the fact that other celebs do these things. All of these celebs have had their 15 minutes of sexy infamy. Now it's Miley's turn, and someone will take her place 6 months from now. So, yes, my argument is, "So what? Big deal. Who cares?" Unless you admit that all of these sexy celebs should go to whore island, your argument has no ground. Zero. I rest my case.