Marilyn Manson should not be banned in any part of the United States.

Observations:1. ) It seems that my opponent has focused more on the legal justifications of actions wihle I have focused on the moral justifications. This is fine, seeing as my justifications weren't as based on morals as they were on fundamental rights, so both cases can be adjusted to a more middle ground. However, I would like the audience to remember the fact that we still won't be able to completely abandon our cases, so it will seem a little akward for a while here.2. ) My arguments about my case will likely be a bit shorter than my opponent's. I'm not trying to be lazy here, but the majority of my argumentation will have to do with the resolution, and as such will be fairly simple. Arguments:My Case:My C1:I will begin by stating that there is no refutation of the legality of parental bans in the household in this contention. My opponent seeks to overturn it by stating that it does not refer to the resolution, however I'd like to point the audience's view towards the structure of the resolution itself. Nowhere does it state that cities or states can't ban his music, simply that it shouldn't be banned anywhere in the United States. Despite her original intentions, my opponent cannot alter the resolution after initial arguments have been made. Therefore, as we agree that parental bans on Marilyn Manson's music are legally acceptable in the US, the resolution fails. My C2:My opponent does not dispute the legal right (and in fact reinforces it) to ban Marilyn Manson music in the workplace, and so for the same reasons as in the C1 the resolution or negated. My opponent proposes a bit of a strawman about Florida School systems, but this is irrelevant as we've already agreed upon two places in the US that can ban Marilyn Manson's arguements, and so the resolution is negated. Pro's Case:First Amendment:The majority of my opponent's case has to do with the first Amendment. The only problem with this is that many of these rights actually work against her case, which I'll show in the following argumentation.1. ) Freedom of Religion: Unless the religious establishment in question is practicing illegal acts or otherwise harmful activities, the government cannot intervene in religious practices due to the First Amendment right of freedom of religion. Because a ban on Manson's music within the religion in question is neither harmful nor illegal, the government has no right to prohibit the ban of his music within the churches themselves. Therefore, the American churches, mosques, synagogues, and so on are places within the US that hold the religious and moral right to ban Marilyn Manson's music within themselves, and so the resolution is negated.2. ) Freedom of Speech: The freedom of speech is a two-way street, so to speak. Although opponents of Manson cannot legally stop his fans from listening to his music (unless they are minors, as they do not hold full rights in the US), the fans of Manson cannot stop individuals from placing bans on his music within their families.3. ) Freedom of Petition: Although I don't have any specific arguments to reinforce my own beliefs in this section, I believe that my opponent misunderstands the freedom of petition. The freedom of petition protects the people's rights to demand certain actions from the government, whether to protect them or correct "grievances". So, as we can see, the first and second rights listed in the First Amendment actually reinforce my case, and present further reasons why the resolution should be negated. Additional Argument:Although I'm sure my opponent agrees that parents are able to prohibit their children from attending these concerts, I'm not advocating the prohibiting of the concerts themselves. I am simply listing reasons why the resolution is false, and so I have nothing against this arguemnt. And so, because there are places within the United States where Marilyn Manson's music can be legally and morally banned, and because my opponent cannot alter the resolution this far into the round, the resolution is negated.