The Government of Nazi run Germany under Hitler was a well designed and successful government.

OPPONENTS REBUTTALS WITH FACTS: The National Labor Service was created by the public sector. Sure, it provided the unemployed something to do with pay and rebuilding Germany. This is what is seen. What is not seen is the amount of jobs in the private sector, which was very few. The government of Nazi Germany was only focused on the public sector, not the private sector. Public sector jobs increase debt and you can not run an economy only on the public sector. You need the private sector, which drives in wealth and innovation and is more important than the public sector. The private sector makes the economy grow. Private companies could of been used to hire the unemployed and could of done the exact same things the public sector jobs could do, but Hitler didn't let that happen. In regards to the KDF and the Volkswagen, no one received a car. All the money put into it actually went to the factories to increase weaponry, as a huge scam. My opponent questioned about the free market and the ability to fix the economy. The free market always fixes the economy if it was altered, which it clearly was by Hitler and the Nazi government. If Nazi Germany relied on the free market and did not alter the economy, their economy would of increased extremely, not relying on the government, but on private companies, reducing the amount of the unemployed. My opponent only talked about the success of the Nazi government, not the design of the government, which was the other half of this debate. I will discuss about the idea that Nazi Germany had a horribly-designed government. DESIGN OF GOVERNMENT: The validity of Nazi Germany having a well-designed government under Hitler is false. Hitler never believed in private and equal rights for everyone. He believed in eugenics and believed in a "perfect race", or the so-called Aryan Race, pure-blood Germans. He believed in undesirables, people he considered the lowest of the low, which included Slavs, Jews, the physically and mentally handicapped, and homosexuals. His book, "Mein Kampf", or "My Struggle" was only a blueprint for what he wanted in Nazi Germany. He never wanted a republic, which is a political system that is led by elected leaders that do not hold their power status on any principle beyond the control of the people living in that state or country. The leaders answer to the general population that has the power to vote the representatives in or out of elected positions. Hitler didn't want this at all. Instead, he wanted a totalitarian government, which is a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed, with a fascist government, which is a system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. Hitler ran a totalitarian-fascist dictatorship under Nazi Germany. This got rid of freedom of expression in all forms. Private and equal rights were gone. The government under the Nazis took over everybody's lives. As much as there were people in Germany surprisingly happy with this, many people in Germany were not happy at all. They hated the Nazis and didn't want to be tied to them at all. Had Nazi Germany ran under a republic, events like the Holocaust would have never occurred. If Germany won WW2, the consequences would be dark. Nazi Germany was extremely oppressive and is an example of how a government should be run. Economics: http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk... Design of government: http://www.targetofopportunity.com...