Gay is Right in Christianity

"I wanted to thank you at first for introducing me to debating, but after the way you shamelessly insulted your fellow debater in a personal, first-person manner, I can not thank you any more. WHEN HAVE I INSULTED YOU? WHEN HAVE I CALLED YOU AN ANTI-CHRIST? If I have been overtly obvious, that is my mathematical brain telling me to list all sources of proof in order that no section should be misunderstood. This is no insult. It is just a simple principle of reasoning. "IT DID NOT WORK! " What is that supposed to mean? Do you conjure that I was mad at you for going against me? You should be careful when you say "I know good and well that this was an attempt to portray me as person who does not follow God. " because your tone interpretation was flawed. I will not say any more mean things about you. I understand that you have only debated twice, yourself, so you might be subjective sometimes. Just remember this: Never be subjective. NEVER! !! I realize that I have been subjective in this argument, but I will apologize right now. I hope that you will accept it. On with a rebuttal and final statement:" I'm going to be honest, I didn't read this. I read the first bit, but it sounded angry, and I don't feel like adding fuel to the agree christian stereotype. Next, I would argue that you did pull a bunny out of a hat. I would also like to argue that you copied and pasted, and did not provide sources. Therefor, you plagiarized, and that entire argument is invalid. ""Which was pecan pie homosexuality of frowned upon, along with pulling out. ", faults in grammar make this sentence impossible to understand. (Pecan pie is a noun, not a verb. I do not pecan pie. )" I do apologize for this, my computer autocorrects, and I can't fix it. . However, you understood what I was getting at, and avoided it. You also did a lot of talking. I wish you would just get to the point, because it just seems, once again, like you are pulling a rabbit out of a hat. your turning nothing, into 5,000 characters. Know that as a person who knows the bible, everything I say is fact based, and I also believe I quoted the bible, Including chapters and versus, this, this argument is also invalid. "To what extent was the conclusion that "everyday men were allowed to write the bible. " made? The men who wrote the Bible were moved by the Holy Spirit. " I'll be the first to tell you that every sunday morning, I am moved by the holy spirit, but alas, I am just a boy, who also sins. "You said earlier that in the rebuttal I called you equivalent to an anti-Christ, but that is not the case. " I suppose I could be mistaken, however I do not remember saying that. You did portray me as a person who teaches a defiled preacher of the word of God, however. "If God is just, why did he give people to vile passions. This is stated in the verses before this passage. The people already had the glory of God shown to them, but they rejected it. They self-proclaimed themselves as the wise. In showing this fact false, God gave them to sin. " Bingo! He didn't give anyone vile passion! the devil did! God gave us freedom. It was just in this freedom that a dark cloud spawned. God didn't give us sin. He gave us the opportunity. Just like how you are faced with opportunities to sin every day. God isn't forcing you to sin, you do that on your own. He just tests you. therefor, this argument is also invalid. "The validity of the whole Bible is nonnegotiable. If you want to say the Bible is biased, that sinful people made the ideas and thoughts in the Bible, then you are not Christian. Yes, now I am calling you an anti-Christ. " The bible is biased! Every doctrine is biased in at least one way or another! And also, you say that non christians are the anti christ? That does not sound very christian like yourself. I believe in Jesus Christ, the son of God. I also believe that all humans are born with sin, like the bible tells us. I am accused by my opponent of being the anti christ, simply because I can balance faith in God, and distrust in humans. This is illogical to say the least. Also, you never really argument my main points and for that, you should vote pro! Also, I would like to point out that all you stated was that it's condemned. You never said that there ought to be no gay rights. You argued all that, and failed to answer the topic. I will pray for you, and also, if you actually read the bible, and did not just search, "bible versus against gays", you would also know that any religious figure would also condemn you on just cooling someone the antichrist, simply because they have done there research.