It is more important for a heterosexual woman to be sexy than a heterosexual man.

This is what I have attempted to do throughout the debate: Appreciate our genders for what they are, not some romantic idealist equal bullsh! T because at the end of the day men are men and women are women (apart from homosexual or hormonally extreme individuals) Explain why, based on what is obviously observable about how the genders prioritise what they seek in their mate (women a strong/wealthy supplier, men a sexy carer) based on years of natural selection and evolution. Offer a well thought out case for my resolution putting a huge amount of effort put into it This is what my opponent has undoubtedly attempted to do throughout the debate: Deny there being any possible way of determining what heterosexual men want in a mate and what heterosexual women want in a mate without offering any evidence against my case. Denied that women are predominantly a visually attracting gender and men are predominantly a 'look what I have' kind of gender without offering any justification other than that if a woman had more she'd benefit and if a man was hotter the same applies however failing to realise that the extent to which being hotter helps a women is far greater in proportion than the benefit to a man as well as money (which a woman will usually gain from her male partner) Denied everything but come up with nothing himself other than that relationships require mutual benefit Now I shall address the closing statement bit by bit:"it's impossible to determine how some random man will react to two random women, one less physically attractive in your opinion, and with an amicable personality, and one without an amicable personality, but who is physically attractive in your opinion. " nothing is random, otherwise everything is and your statement means that this debate should be impossible in first place. "There are all sorts of characteristics about a person that contributes to their physical attraction, including how they carry and assert themselves, how well they care for themselves, and so on. " That doesn't mean that I didn't include care for oneself and how one carries themselves around as factors affecting physical attractiveness, of course they do. "I've lived with a few women in my life, and I can tell you for a fact that a girl that wakes up looking fairly plain can walk out the door looking like a knockout, even without an overabundance of a single thing, like makeup. " And would you deny that she greatly benefits from this? Of course not, point proven. Why do you think women wear make up far more commonly? They NEED it to compete so to say. "When a girl lets herself go, and holes up in her room with unbaked cookie dough without brushing her teeth or washing, she will come out looking ratty and somewhat icky. However, after a shower, some exfoliation, and a little treat (say, painting her nails or something), she will blossom into a beautiful, delicious flower once again. " But why would she bother if she didn't gain a huge amount from it? EXACTLY! "So, these coarse distinctions by which you're dividing people as though through divine ordainment, are false, if not because these distinctions are meaningless (a good personality and sexiness), then because one requires the other. " If you are a good person but are ugly and are a woman you are not likely to find a mate compared with a sexy b! tch want to know how I know? Well, a man would be scared to marry such an ugly wife I mean better to not enter the relationship than have to tell her, to her face in bed, that she's too ugly for you to get hard (women don't have to get wet to have sex, lube is sufficient and they can even enjoy it eventually by rubbing the clitoris a lot whereas a man cannot masturbate at the same time as f*cking her can he now? ). " Anyone in a relationship, man or woman, would be inclined to seek satisfaction elsewhere if they're not attracted to their mate. " The deal-breaker for men is largely based on how ugly or fat she is. "This is because, they aren't with their mate because they mutually decided that they fancied one another. Instead, one convinced the other to be with him, using money as coercion. " My point is that money would not really work in the reverse gender's scenario to even begin with coercion. "Those who enter into a relationship due to mutual interest are attracted to one another, period, lest neither would have had the opportunity to enter into a relationship in the first place. " Men enter it for looks predominantly, fascinated by the woman's 'beauty' often delusionally saying to friends "SHE IS A 10/10 dude so ridiculously hot! " whereas women would probably say "He's so kind, so sweet and ARRRGH he has the whole package, money, humour, Looks(but it is one of MANY factors) argh EVERYTHING! "Thanks for the debate, may the best debater win.