The nature of nothingness is negative not neutral

Something: anything that existsempty space: the absence of everything other than itself. absence of light, heat and matter. nothing: the absence of everything. Let's imagine a world with nothing in it....Can we imagine that? no, we cannot. We can imagine a world absent of light, heat and material existence but this would just leave dark, cold, empty space. empty space is not nothing, it is empty space which is something. What would happen if we remove this empty space? we cannot comprehend what would happen because there wouldn't be anything for it to happen to, thereby making the concept of a world of nothingness paradoxical. But why is it paradoxical? why can't nothing just be if it's neutral? Because it is not neutral. That is why you cannot imagine it because it CANNOT (read, must not) be. empty space is neutral. material is positive and nothingness is negative. If nothingness was neutral or positive then you could imagine it but you can't. What makes empty space neutral? well, neutral is just a word we use to describe things. In regards to it relationship with nothingness it is neutral because it has a quantifiable value of zero. Zero in maths is a place holder. It holds no quanitifiable value except to denote an increase in numbers. Numbers cannot exist without a 0 present. For example, if i only have 3 zero's prior to the integer 1 I cannot reach 10,000. 0001, 0010, 0100, 1000. A single 0 had to exist to begin with or else we couldn't even start with 1. But you see if we don't have more than 4 zeros we cannot continue to escalate beyond 1000.This is the same as empty space. Without empty space to begin with we cannot put a single piece of matter in the universe and without double that empty space we cannot put 2 bits of single matter in the universe, Therefore, empty space has the quantifiable value of 0, each piece of matter has a quantifiable value of 1 and what value lies beneath 0? what would we be left with if we removed all matter then finally empty space? 3,2,1,0... -1 or nothingness. Using this demonstration we can see that nothingness has the same quantifiable nature of -1. that is, if you add it to a positive they will cancel each other out. Back to my example, zero's are infinite so our 1 can keep escalating just like empty space is infinite which is why things can keep coming into existence. empty space is the first requirement for existence because if there is no empty space there isn't anything for there to exist in. every single material thing is occupying empty space. however empty space is not occupying empty space. that's why empty is neutral and nothingness is negative. i can't prove this with physical evidence of course but based on this simple reasoning it is only reasonable to believe nothingness is subtracting. The universe exists in opposites. without opposites then things lose all meaning: man - woman. life - death. happiness - sadness. material - immaterial. good - bad. Everything must have an opposite. so if material existence is a positive (life, matter, actions) then what's the negative? is it anti-matter? no, anti-matter is still material therefore it is a positive even though it destroys matter. A human that kill other humans may be considered anti-human but they are still human themselves. So what is the opposite of existence? it's nothingness. and we can tell what the nature of nothing is by comapring it to the nature of something (ie, existence)Something: existence, multiplying, materialization, inside the universe, positiveempty space: a place holder for existence, infinite, neutralnothingness: non-existence, subtracting, de-materialization, negative As you can see i've given plenty of reason to believe that nothing is most likely to be negative than neutral. If empty space is neutral then how can nothingness also be neutral? you can't have more neutral or less neutral, something is either neutral or it is not. I've proven why empty space should be considered neutral because it most closely resembles the quantifiable number 0. So if we have reason to believe empty space is neutral then what would that make nothingness? it can't be positive or neutral, therefore, it must be negative. Even neutral is a characteristic. If i say something is neutral that means it has NO effect on things, therefore i should be able add or subtract from a neutral environment. Can i add to nothingness? can i place an apple in nothingness? no, i cannot, because nothingness implies the absence of everything including empty space and if there is no empty space to put my apple in then where can i put it? Can i remove nothingness? no, because what would that leave? You cannot go below nothingness; you cannot go below nothingness because now you are in the negatives. Can i add to empty space? yes, i chuck an apple in empty space and no effect has occured. can i remove from empty space? yes, i can remove an apple and no effect has occured. can i remove empty space itself? in reality, no, but theoretically you can because we can go a step below empty space and into nothingness but once you get to nothingness you can no longer remove anything because there is nothing to remove. This is why nothingness is a negative. An absolute nagative must exist or else positive and neutral would not exist. everything has an opposite. what's the opposite of existence? non-existence/nothingness. Just because something does not exist that does not mean it does'nt have a characteristic or else why we even have a name for it? The characterstic of nothingness is the complete absence of everything. now we've concluded it's characteristic then we can assume it has some form of nature. I'm proposing it's subtracting for the above reasons. Here's a concept that has no characteristics: Jimmiwawabingbong. What are the characteristics of Jimmiwawabingbong? It has no charateristics, it's just a combination of letters, it doesn't mean anything, therefore, it has no nature, it is meaningless. Even nothingness means something: The complete absence of everything. It's a step up from jimmiwawabingbong so it must have 1 greater characteristic than Jimmiwawabingbong. If it has one greater characteristic then it also has 1 greater attribute. Here are another bunch of concepts with no characteristic or attributes: Commilinga, t8sicles, foggyshimsack, comlickballbag, gotsyshimovelays, coverjsklsd,lnaskf, daslkhaskf;av, slfknafkjs89fy32fb, hviduhve=-efef8efb, f83f783fbekjfndsvc783f, dlkkflsnvkj, buttonmash, aslkfa;kjcbackj, aifakcbadkncvacnldsc, ibdvsbvsvs Notice how all the above are meaningless and the only thing that seperates them is a varying combination of letters. This is the true meaning of having no characterstic beyod a title. Nothingness stands out from all these meangningless words because nothingness has a meaning. if nothing has a meaning then it has a characteristic. If it has a characteristic then is has a nature. it's nature is subtracting. Con must give reason for us to believe that nothingness is neutral. He must explain what makes nothingness neutral. What makes nothingness meaningless. We can not add, subtract or imagine nothingness thereby making meaningless according to Con. Sorry for the late reply. thanks for joining in.