Schools dress codes should be better enforced

I'd love it if pro could use a different link to the article she's trying to reference. It's being taken from a database that I don't have access to.I want to touch on a few key things before we go into the specific responses to her previous round.To begin with, I want to reference my argument that the entire policy of asking someone to change into something more "acceptable" if their choice of clothing doesn't meet the "standards" is what's known as "slut-shaming". She directly links into slut-shaming when she starts talking about "If the butt is out of the shorts then the teacher would ask them to change.". It's effectively demeaning the girls---and it's specficially girls, since guys are never the targets of this kind of policy---and harms their self-worth. This was touched on in the previous source I linked in the last round. Slut-shaming is going to have multiple impacts on education ins chools, and thus the round. First, it's going to hamper the girl's confidence in themselves because all they're being seen as is a distraction in the learning process of men instead of as actual people, which a) encourages sexism in the schooling process and b) harms the self-worth of the individual girls affected by this sexist policy, making them less wanting to go to school to learn. Second, it's going to encourage sexism in other places. Guys are going to learn that women have to conform to other people's interests from watching them constantly have to conform how they look in school, which is only going to lead to other sexist practices when those guys grow up and enter the workforce. None of this was ever responded to, and thus a reason to not allow the clothing policy to become any stricter/harsher.Also, for the second round in a row, she never responds to the argument I make about how trying to ojectively enforce the policy isn't possible, thus making it stricter doesn't actually solve for anything. If it doesn't solve for anything, then there's no reason to do it.Now to respond to her specific arguments.She wrote: "It would help if parents cared what their child wears." All this is doing is making the presumption that what the girls are wearing is wrong and needs changing, which is a part of what we're debating. She wrote: "Also why does the school system have a rule/policy in place if they don't enforce it?" First, the debate isn't about that if they are enforcing it or not, rather if they're enforcing it well and if changing the ruling to be stricter/harsher would be beneficial. Even your arguments are saying that they're just being really bad about how they enforce the rule, not that they aren't enforcing it entirely. Second, even if they just aren't enforcing it at all, hell if I know lol. I'm not a school admin. It's really irrelevant if they aren't enforcing it at all right now since what we're asking is a hypothetical "what would happen if we did this" kind of thing anyway. She wrote: "Even though a girl is sitting down doesn't mean her butt isn't showing." Uhhh...how is it not? I don't see a way to physically show off your butt when your butt is seated in a chair... And finally, she wrote: "The process of checking the short length wouldn't be obnoxious like the skirt length checking, it would be quick." First, she gives you no reason to believe that it would be quick, while I listed off multiple problems with this kind of strategy earlier in the debate. Second, even if it would be quick, it would a) still bite into the harms of slut-shaming, and b) still wouldn't even solve for the initial problem in the first place because it's still the faulty teachers who are the real problem doing the enforcing of the rule.