China is deliberately buying America

I'm actually really inclined to defend my sources first.An Espousing Rearming "Why would you give us a website in the Chinese language (3)?" It's possible that I may have hastily assumed the impression that my audience would have access to Google Translate or something of the kind. Also, I do believe I summarized it by stating that the traffic business is risky in China. As for my second source regarding the matter, that it is... "highly unprofessional and has nothing to back up its own claims." Being that it is a secondary source, I didn't deem it necessary to have it be as professional as my first source. My reasoning was that having both a statistical and professional source, as well as one that was based off of a person's experience, would make it a stronger case. "And I'm really sorry but do you honestly expect youtube to be a good source? Let alone when it cites a video game?" This was a fault in the same manner as well. I took another hasty impression and assumed most people knew what a baby boom is. My opponent's source regarding the baby boom didn't define it either, so I hardly think my fault is anything more than negligible. I also believe that speaking of the unbalancing of the dependency ratio implied a definition for the baby boom. Nonetheless, to satisfy my opponent, here is a source defining the baby boom.[1] "The rest of your sources have nothing to do with what we're talking about" A looming hunch in my mind has a circumstantial verdict, and that verdict isssss: Pro really didn't read anything I put that round at all at all. Hopefully, Pro will at least read everything I assert henceforth. Rebutting the Rebuttal I, unfortunately, am not sure how you're rebutting me here. "The baby boom. Did you know that nearly all of the children that were born then are growing up? That means that once they retire then they will depend on the government teat for welfare and social security. There's not enough of us youngsters to keep up with their demands, so that means we would have to borrow more (unless of course we cut programs)." Wh-!? Yes!? I exhibited an understanding of the baby boom's after effects in my argument! I'm growing more and more certain that Pro failed to read anything I said in Round 2. "4. I'd like to compare the two country's debts. China is actually paying off it's external debt and public debts, but USA's debt to China is much higher than China's debt to USA." I'm not sure why you labeled two of the rebuttals in your list "4," but it matters not. I've already cited a source from Forbes debunking the potential threat in this, summarizing it by saying that we buy things from China, and still two remain.[2][3] However, it's important to not just have Forbes as a source. So here's just a few more.[4][5][6][7][8][9] I'm willing to concede with your notion that China is a bit hostile with the United States. But they need each other. They just need to give each other a reason, just a little bit's enough, then they can learn to love again. If China decides to stop supporting the US, it wouldn't affect America too much, in contrast to how much it would affect China.[10] China's far too deep in hostile, bursting infants to do anything to harm the US right now, mate. ;) http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.forbes.com... http://www.forbes.com... http://www.thetakeaway.org... http://www.china-embassy.org... http://blog.heritage.org... http://news.smh.com.au... http://www.bankrate.com... http://www.theatlantic.com... http://www.bloomberg.com...