The Earth orbits the Sun

Okay, so Pro begins with the argument of Parallax. He states that parallax would only be possible under a heliocentric model. This is incorrect. While, indeed, parallax would not be witnessed if the stars were orbiting the earth, It would be witnessed if the stars' orbits were around the Sun. This is best understood visually, so here is a video that gives a diagram of this: The video is long, so you do not have to watch the whole thing. The diagram of this appears 20:10 into the video. Retrograde motion: or, Mars. It is very simple to get the pattern we see mars take in the sky with the geocentric model. Once again, put Mar's orbit around the Sun as the Sun orbits the Earth and the same thing will be seen. Once again, best understood visually. The diagram of this appears 27:24 into the video Gravity: "In reality, Newton did not teach that the smaller must go around the larger; rather, he taught that all celestial bodies will revolve around the center of mass. As such, even Newton agreed in his Principia that the earth could occupy the center of mass if all the other bodies in the universe were strategically placed around it so that all their gravitational masses balanced out at the center. In short, this is the scientific basis for geocentrism " the earth is the center of mass for the universe, and thus the universe will revolve around the earth." Dr. Robert Sungenis You may think you see a contradiction where in one place I say the stars and planets (except Earth) orbit the Sun, and in another place I say the Universe revolves around the Earth. Let me clarify, the Universe (including the Sun) revolve around a stationary Earth as they all take an orbit around the sun, which is orbiting the Earth. The Earth is the center of mass as the universe revolves around it. This Also is depicted in Dr. Sungenis' diagrams of the geocentric model shown in the link above. My turn now, 1. In the time laps photos of Polaris, It is apparent that the stars farthest away from Polaris have a longer stream of light behind than those closer to Polaris, as if the outer stars are moving faster than the inner. If it was the Earth that was spinning and not the stars orbiting the Earth. all the stars would have the same length streams of light behind them in the time laps photos as it is, as the heliocentric model states, the Earth that is spinning while the stars remain stationary. Time laps photos do not show this, they instead seem to demand the stars moving rather than the Earth. Explanation please? 2. According to the Heliocentric model, the Earth orbits the Sun, and meanwhile the Moon orbits the Earth. If the Moon was orbiting a moving Earth it would have to accelerate when orbiting in the same direction that the Earth orbits the Sun, and then decelerate as it begins orbiting back around opposite the direction that the Earth orbits the Sun. What outside force causes the Moon to constantly accelerate and decelerate? Newton's first law states, an object at rest or in motion will continue as such unless acted on by another force. On top of this, Kepler's second and third laws of orbital motion state: A planet"s orbital speed changes, depending on how far it is from the Sun. The closer a planet is to the Sun, the stronger the Sun"s gravitational pull on it, and the faster the planet moves. The farther it is from the Sun, the weaker the Sun"s gravitational pull, and the slower it moves in its orbit. And, a planet farther from the Sun not only has a longer path than a closer planet, but it also travels slower, since the Sun"s gravitational pull on it is weaker. Therefore, the larger a planet"s orbit, the longer the planet takes to complete it. http://howthingsfly.si.edu... This contradicts the way heliocentrism depicts the orbit of the Moon around a moving Earth even without Newton's first law, because according to Kepler's laws, the Moon should speed its orbit when closest to the Sun, and slow when it's farthest. But the heliocentric model demands that the Moon decelerates when closest to the Sun, and accelerates when farthest from the Sun. I know that Kepler's laws were directed to that which orbits the Sun, but the same concept applies because, according to the heliocentric model, the Moon would feel the Sun's gravitational pull just like the Earth. Back to Newton's first Law. Let's say there were two men on a track around a football field. One man's name is Earth, the other man's name is Moon. Earth begins running at a constant speed around the field. As he runs, Moon begins to run circles around him as they both run around the field together. This is a model of how the Earth and Moon orbit the sun according to the Heliocentric model. But in order for Moon to run circles around Earth, he has to accelerate on Earth's right, pass him, cross in front to Earth's left, decelerate, and cross behind Earth towards his right, and then repeat. If the Moon is doing this, It is breaking the Law of physics that clearly states: An object at rest or in motion will remain as such unless acted on by another force. 3. According to the Heliocentric model, the Earth orbits a stationary Sun with a 300 million km wide orbit... At the same time Polaris sits stationary with the Sun directly in point of Earth's 23.4 degree axis. Here is the problem, if Earth makes a 300 million km wide orbit, its axis would of course orbit with it, and would no longer be pointing at Polaris. As Polaris remains stationary with the Sun, Polaris would also be appearing to orbit the Earth just like the Sun. https://www.youtube.com...... You can watch this video if you want to see a visual description of what I am talking about. He has an annoying voice so bear through. The visual description of this starts at 1:14 into the video. In the Geocentric model, Earth sits stationary with no tilt, and Polaris sits directly above.