On average who is smarter men (Pro) or women (Con)

If something is true even if it is not back up by an authority it still remains true. If something is false even if it is back up by an authority it still remains false. Therefore a logically consistent ideas do not necessarily need a source to back it up. However, reliable sources do add credibility to an argument. You refer to the academic field which builds its model on empirical evidence. This is why they ask that all arguments must be source. However, this is not the only model. There is also a school of thought called rationalism which states: "that reason rather than experience is the foundation of certainty in knowledge." "I claim that your arguments are conjecture because the burden of proof is upon the instigator of a argument." Both side of issue are making the claim is smarter than the other therefore the burden of proof is on both parties. No where do I say this: "You saying that I must find proof on why your argument is illogical is following the logic of guilty until proven innocent" -> I said you must either proof your position or support your point of view. Also you must find the flaw in my arguments. "This section of your argument bases itself on the "average women" without providing any sources to back him up." -> The claim that one need source every time one makes an argument is absurd. Source merely support ones arguments by linking it to an authority which gives it more credibility but the lack of source does not invalidate one proposition. This argument is nonsensical and false:""Secondly the my opponent bases that women are more self than men which is real person dependent rather than gender dependent. -> No where do I claim that women are more self than men, what ever that means. "For if you watch any commercial both often present unrealistic expectations so you could make the assertion that both men and women are sensitive on what other people think of them." -> This is argument is pointless as I said that women are more sensitive to what other people think not that men were not. "However, for men it often manifests it self in other sources such as Viagra and other sexual enhancement drugs or their height" -> Pointless argument, Viagra is a drug that allow men who are unable to get an erection to get an erection therefore they use it for practical purposes. Unsupported claim: "Thus I would argue that both men and women are equally concerned of how they appear." -> Your previous argues are showing that both sexes are concern but what others think of them which is not up for debate. It does not, however, show that they are equally concerned by it. "I'm curious on were you discovered this average conversation correlation with women" -> This comes from the premise that women are more concern by what others think therefore more driven social which makes them more social. Because of this they are involved more in the "average conversation". "Finally I'm shocked that you find women more complacent because even now women are given less pay for equal work, their rights over their body is still being questioned, and are unequally represented in governmental institutions." -> Yes, your right. That was ignorant. I used a word without knowing it definition properly. What I meant to say was more obedient. I will not make that mistake again however. -> My intended statement was : "Since, they are more obedient (instead of complacent), on average, they will be less likely to try to find the logical inconsistencies of the statement on other. Therefore, they will have a weaker ability to filter out bad information." "Also how will you account for a lack of education because women are unfortunately far less likely to receive a education." -> Your argument is a counter-argument to your position since knowledge is also part of a persons intelligences. For example, who you say that a cavemen who has high performing brain is smart than the average person now? One needs knowledge to be able to reason and therefore the more academic knowledge one has the more he has tools to work with in order to solve problems making him smarter.