The existence of God is plausible

Also I would like to point out that the man arguing against the existence of god has a devil for an icon. That's just downright hilarious. Good luck sir! The existence of god is a touchy subject. For this sake of this debate I would like to clarify that I am not arguing about religion, or it's effects on the moral compass of society, rather I am arguing purely for the existence of God. I want to make myself clear, I do not believe that the earth was created 4000 years ago. I believe in evolution, and I do not think it negates the existence of god. Below I will list three main points that demonstrate my evidence for the existence of god. Imagine two people looking at Mount Rushmore. One man says, "Isn't it amazing what wind and erosion over time can create" The second man has his doubts. 1. The Anthropic Cosmological principal This principal in essence states that the universe we live in must be compatible with conscious life, because we can observe it. This sounds obvious, but think about it. If any of the physical constants that hold our universe together where changed even slightly, conscious life would not be able to exist. In example: if the strong nuclear force was slightly weaker, subatomic particles would not be able to form atoms. If the gravitational constant was stronger, galaxies and solar systems wouldn't be able to form, everything would simply clump together. This has been proven by the theoretical physicist. There is no reason that the universe should of evolved this way. It seems the world we live in was specifically made. It would be egocentric to claim the universe was made just so we could exist, this is not what I'm saying. I'm simply pointing out that the mere fact that conscious life can exist in the first place is incredible. 2. Free will A true Atheist cannot logically believe in free will. Scientists believe that all choices we make are the result of biological clockwork. Everything is simply a result of chemical A reacting with chemical B, causing neurons in your brain to fire in a specific way. If you mix two acids, they do not choose how to react based on life experience, they simply react. I argue that free will DOES exist. I believe that it is the result of the phenomenon of consciousness. This brings me to my next point. 3. Consciousness No matter how clever a machine is, it will never be self aware. Imagine if you would, a supercomputer. This computer has a camera and a microphone. That computer now has sensory input. You then programmed this computer to learn from experience. Do you believe that this computer is now self aware? It can see and hear and learn and interact. It will make logical choices. But no matter how smart it seems, it will never be conscious. This is because A MACHINE CANNOT BE SELF AWARE. It is simply a machine. Similarly, humans are biological machines, yet we can think for ourselves. This phenomenon can only be explained by the presence of divine intervention. No matter how much we evolve, no matter how advanced we are, a biological machine can never think for itself. A biological machine does not have free will. It cannot even know of it's own existence. This is unfortunately, the current scientific understanding for what humans are. Just highly evolved, biological machines. The presence of god would explain these phenomena. I prefer to think of god in a kind of omnipresent conscious energy, as opposed to a man in the sky with a big white beard, flooding humans for fun. If the universe was created by some kind of conscious energy, this could explain everything that science fails to explain. Imagine a force that was aware of itself. This kind of conscious force could change the universe how it saw fit. But forces cannot have awareness you say, what a ridiculous notion! Imagine if a force as simple as light was aware when it was being observed. Wouldn't that be strange? Well actually this is true. (see double slit experiment) It seems that light is aware when it's being observed. So is it really that much of a stretch of the imagination to think that energy can have awareness? I'll leave that for the reader to decide. In conclusion, I would like my opponent to refute these 3 points: How can a biological machine have free will? How can a biological machine be self aware? A rational explanation for why the universe can able to support life. If these can be explained by modern science, or logical reasoning then I will resign this debate.