Biblical Creationism is more probable than atheistic naturalism

I had hoped for both our sakes that we would have provided a challenge for one another. My opponent forfeited last round and that is discouraging. [INTRODUCTION] I will just repeat what I have already mentioned. In the last round I made points in my argument and in this round I will explain them further. [Support of God] [1] Rationality does not arise from out of nothing but only from another rationality. A rational decision is one that is not just reasoned, but is also optimal for achieving a goal. What goal? Rationality is most different than anything else in physical nature. One's reasoning power by direct force makes our brain move in ways that the brain would not move unless of this power. Then physical particles move after a rational thought has been produced. Thus, we can not control the non-physical particles that causes a rational thought. [2] God is simply outside the rules of nature. If God created the universe than He is outside of it. The Bible itself says that the universe can not contain Him. In physics and relativity, at least ten dimensions exist at the creation. Three of these dimensions formed our space-time that we observe. The other six are compact dimensions. God must be outside all ten dimensions to have created the universe and its dimensions. [3] If the universe had a beginning then something started it. There is many theories but only one can give the exact answer. If the Big Bang theory were true, it still doesn't explain how the Big Bang came about itself. There is no plausible explanation other than the Biblical explanation. [4] Evolutionist could not explain with any knowledge or confidence how our moon formed. They teach that our earth is estimated at 4.6 billion years old. Though moon rocks brought back were dated at 5.3 billion years old, this is about 1 billion years older. The moon does not fit any natural method. These oddities strongly indicate an artificial origin for the moon. [5] Every cell of out the body exists a detailed instruction code which is like a computer program. A program that seems designed. Any instruction or teaching comes with the intent to give knowledge. Our natural biological cause suggests that prior programmed information is the cause. Nature can not and could not create precise information like that without intention. [6] The majority of people do believe that God exist. This calculation dates back for thousands years and it is still the preferred belief today. [SUPPORT OF THE BIBLICAL ACCOUNT] [7] Earth has many features that can only be explained by a worldwide flood. There is scientific evidence presenting the earth's features and fossils were formed over 5,ooo years ago. The global flood recorded in Genesis 7 is the phenomena witnessed in our fossil layers. Before the flood our oceans and mountains were much lower. There also is no coincidence that 200 flood legends are recorded around the world. Many describing one family that survives. This evidence is all around and has been recorded for centuries. [8] We know that if a creature is denied air it dies. This is apparent. It is also apparent that God said that He gave the breath of life. [9] Scientist have verified that creation started with time, space and matter just as the Bible stated in the very first verse. [PROBLEMS WITH ATHEISTIC NATURALISM] [10] Atheistic Naturalism has become the position of not being interested in certain possibilities for just principle. With the surrounding knowledge brought forth from this earth, naturalism can not explain alot. We are left to determine that naturalist do not want to know the truth of our earth but a pre-determined doctrine instead. Naturalism presumes that its scientific foundations are unbiased. All natural sciences have philosophical foundations. Natural scientists experimentation with theories derived from their own personal training. [11] Naturalist maintain a continuing naturalistic origin and increase in complexity. In 1976, Henry Morris explains his great discovery: "The most devastating and conclusive argument against evolution is the entropy principle. This principle (also known as the Second Law of Thermodynamics) implies that. .. evolution in the 'vertical' sense (that is, from one degree of order and complexity to a higher degree of order and complexity) is completely impossible. The evolutionary model of origins and development requires some universal principle which increases order. .. however the only naturalistic scientific principle which is known to effect real changes in order is the Second Law, which describes a situation of universally deteriorating order. " [12] For one cannot embrace naturalism and scientific realism. Naturalism can have no legitimate support from natural science. Scientific realism entails the falsity of naturalism. [13] There is no way to use natural science to substantially prove (or disprove) an infinite universe. Again as another point we are physical and can not possibly calculate things outside of that physical state. [14] All we here about are mutations of bacteria and viruses. Even those explanations are inadequate to claim naturalistic evolution. This is answered above. Billions of people have witnessed billions of new people arise in no other way, for thousands of years. The origin of life was a unique event. The certainty of design has been demonstrated, science cannot identify the designer. Given a designer with the intelligence to construct all life forms, it is not only logical but the only logical possibility. Life was designed. It did not evolve. [CLOSE] We have again considered the realities of Creationism and Naturalism. The relationship between nature and creationism is even more apparent. Though it still is not looking as probable for atheistic naturalism. Atheist wants to believe in naturalism, there are too many objections to its validity. I have successfully given my case again. Thank you for reading and thanks to my opponent. [RESOURCES] . http://home.comcast.net... . http://en.wikipedia.org... . http://www.rense.com... . http://EzineArticles.com... . http://www.wnd.com... . http://www.reasonsforgod.org... . http://faculty.bucks.edu... . http://www.freerepublic.com...