DDOlympic: Abortion should be illegal

I will be posting my defense in this round, and the conclusion of the debate. My opponent will have to waive next round. My opponent doesn't say anything else about the framework, so I will assume it is the same as what he did say in this second round. My opponent says that living things are meant to be applied to species, not humans at different stages of development. Yes, but as I showed, a fetus is not a human being, which makes them different species. And, you do not rebut anything about the 7 catgeories, only making an assumption, which is false, so vote for Con. And my opponent doesn't show that the fetus is living anyways. He says that my evidence is wrong, so the fetus is living. He has no evidence, and I showed evidence, and I showed it is right, therefore voters must buy my claim. Most bad babies come from non-abortions, look at here: . http://www.debate.org...My opponent says about non-living, which I showed is false, so my opponent's rebuttal is wrong. My opponent also doesn't say anything about the mother's liberty, and that was the main point of that argument, and as my opponent doesn't rebut anything from it, please vote for Con for just this argument alone. My opponent also says that abortion is legal. We are talking about if abortion should be legal, or not. So, logically, we can't legalize something which is legal, so we are talking about illegal abortions, for common sense. It says that of all abortions, nearly half are illegal abortions [1]. That is a very big number, and they are very common, if it is half of the time. But we aren't talking about the number here. We are talking *if* there is an illegal abortion, and causes deaths, or *if* there is no abortion which is illegal. And there are illegal abortions, which do cause deaths, which means be should ban illegal abortions, so we should just legalize abortions altogether, as if we ban all abortion, there will be more illegal abortions than ever. Therefore, vote for Con on this argument alone, as this is the most important argument in the whole debate, and my opponent fails to rebut this argument. My opponent says that they don't need to care for the babies, they can put them in adoption. First of all, it cost money in the hospital to even get a baby out. Few thousands of dollars in the hospital itself. That is a lot of money, and we are basically throwing away that much money by just giving the baby to others. My opponent doesn't rebut anything about the teenage argument, so vote for Con from this argument. As a conclusion, In this debate, I said that A Fetus is not alive, A fetus has no right of life, The mother's liberty, Illegal Abortions, and Teenagers. My opponent said that the fetus is alive, that it is the mother's fault of creating the child, and That killing is not justified. I showed a fetus is not alive through 1.7 categories of life, and 2. the fetus only meets two of them, so the fetus is not living; A fetus has no right of life through reasons above in my 3. first argument and 4. that non-living things have no rights, and the fetus is no living; The mother's liberty through reasons that 5. the fetus is not living, when the mother is a living being, and 6. that living beings have liberty; The Illegal Abortion argument was through reasons 7. that many people get illegal abortions, and many die from it, so we should just legalize abortion, because it we ban abortion, there will be more illegal abortions; And the Teenage Argument was supported by 8. that many teenagers need to pay money for a baby, and they can't, so we should have abortion. My opponent rebuts the arguments by saying about species, but that does not rebut reason 1 and 2. The fetus is not living. My opponent gives no other rebuttals, so all of my arguments are not refuted. My opponent's argument, that the fetus is alive, was supported by no reasons, as my opponent gave no evidence. My reasons 1 and 2 had evidence, so they overwhelmed his first argument. My opponent's argument that it is the mother's fault of creating the child was supported by any reasons, my opponent only gave an assertion, and he gave no evidence. Also, I rebutted the argument by saying that a baby can come out ridiculously, and it is not their fault, and also, my arguments outweigh the magnitude of this argument, as my arguments had more magnitude then this one. My opponent's argument that killing is not justified is true that killing is not justified, but rebutted by my first argument and second argument, because the fetus is not alive. So, we cannot count it as killing. I have won all my arguments, when my opponent has no arguments, as I refuted all of them, vote for me. Thanks for the debate, and please vote for Con, because of the strong defense, good rebuttals, and good arguments from Con. This is basically the last round, as my opponent needs to waive the last round.