The Accused is going to Hell (For Rejecting Catholic Mariology)

On the Assumption of Mary If the Old Testament Ark was taken up (i.e. assumed) into Heaven then why Mary, the New Ark, was not taken up? The Ark was taken to heaven because it’s a thing, a box indeed which is of sacred importance. The Scripture never records that Mary was resurrected and was assumed into heaven. According to the scriptural data, Mary is infected with the original sin and hence, must experience human death (Luke 1:28, Romans 8:3). Conclusion: Therefore, the Scripture can only validates is that Mary’s spirit must have been taken by angels into the paradise the very moment of her death (Luke 16:22). On Mary as the Second Eve If Mary was the second Eve then she must be 1) sinless 2) peccable ( i.e. able to sin). The Scriptures never records that Mary was the second Eve. According to the scriptural data, Mary is infected with the original sin and hence, she’s not sinless and that her ability to sin wasn’t from her being the Second Eve but from being the offspring of Eve per se (Luke 1:28, Romans 8:3). In fact, Mary cannot be the second Eve at all because Jesus wasn’t the second Adam. The Scriptures never records Jesus as the “second Adam” but as “the last Adam”: 1 Corinthians 15:45- “And so it is written, the first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.” Jesus as the Last Adam evinces that there’s no second, third and fourth Adam. It means that Jesus cannot fail (i.e. impeccable) because if he did fail then it means that he is not the Last Adam. Conclusion: For Mary to be an antitype of Eve, she must be 1) sinless 2) impeccable but these were not demonstrated in the Scriptures but on the contrary, the Scriptures present plain teaching about Mary: She’s both the New Testament Ark and the one who’s Full of Grace, both which are predicates that explains her need of a Savior just like the rest of humanity ( Luke 1:28, Romans 8:3). On Mary as the Mother of all living If Mary is the mother of all living (i.e. the church) then she must be expressing her motherhood to her offspring through 1) Nurturing, protecting, and teaching her child (i.e. the church) 2) intercession (i.e. prayer) for them. The Scripture never records that Mary as the Mother of all the living (i.e. the church). The RCC found this idea in making Mary as the antitype of Eve just as Jesus is Adam’s antitype. But it is already proven that Mary cannot be an antitype of Eve because she is impeccable. Eve was the mother of all the living (i.e. humans) for in and through her all will the possibility of offspring to exist. Simply put, without Eve Adam couldn’t have a baby. Hence, Eve was the progenitor of all biological humans. Mary, on the other hand, cannot be the mother of the church because every function a mother does for such a holy assembly can only be a work of the holy Trinity. In fact, the New Testament explicitly records who is the mother of the church and it's not Mary!But the Jerusalem (not Mary) that is above is free, and she is our mother. --Galatians 4:26 ( New Testament age, written by the Apostle Paul himself). On the Intercession of Mary Mary is praying for the church according to the Scriptures per se (Revelation 5:8, Revelation 8:3–4). On the other hand, there was never a command in the Scriptures to ask Mary in heaven to pray for us sinners on earth. If Mary is already praying for us in heaven without us asking her to do it then how great it is! In fact, Mary and all other saints in heaven are not aware of what’s happening on earth based on the scriptures itself: Luke 15:1-10 proves without a shadow of doubt that persons in heaven is not aware of what’s happening on earth unless God told them. On Genesis 3:15 The Seed Mary wasn’t the one who will crush the head of the serpent. The Septuagint records this: And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel. The Woman The Woman in Genesis 3:15 is not Mary but Eve because if Mary was the Woman then does the text indicate a change in the identity of the woman on either a literal or spiritual level? No it does not. So, the woman in Gen 3:15 is NOT Mary, it is Eve. The enmity with Satan began with Eve and her offspring immediately after the fall, NOT with the birth of Jesus. Adam and Eve were expelled from garden of Eden as a result of their sin, and suddenly had to work and till the soil for food. They were forbidden to eat from the tree of life and faced a certain death as a result. Who doubts the enmity with Satan and his seed began with Adam and Eve?