"Intense" Negotiations with terrorists should happen

So yeah the thesis was just what was posted on the site I just copied and pasted what the debate was to be on so there you go as to the title stuff. A big thing I'd like to say prior to any other arguments is that not once did I mention Muslims or the religion of Islam so I'd like to put those arguments moot. The terrorism I am referring to spans everyone because it is discriminatory to group all terrorists within those strict boundary's. So matching your paragraph on Chamberlain with my own... This paragraph you state basically reiterates my point that by not invading it proved fatal. My argument is that we should take a jump on that and instead of waiting for the terrorists to wage an even more deadly war with things such as biological weapons and such. Also there are no real distinction as to say who's stronger the Nazi's or the modern day terrorists. The fighting style is different as Ill get to and each with their separate weapons. On your definition of terrorism the part you define is again a narrow view as to what terrorism really is. It is a group of individuals who form a group in order to resist a government or group of governments. They use terror as a means of doing so. It isn't just limited to civilians it spans political figure heads to religious figure heads. Terrorists are less of a minority than you think thousands are active and even more are sleeper cells. For the sentence you said on each of my arguments 1. You cannot in one sentence summarized the strength difference between the Nazis and the terrorists. Like I stated above these are different times with different methods, much more sneaky methods. This is the same problem and as you stated in the past it caused untold catastrophe. So no its not negated. 2. Even if we do have the resources like I said before and you chose to ignore it is counter productive. Their pictures are used in the media to portray the US as "oppressive", and they are used as pawns by other terrorists in prisoner releases which encourages kidnappings and hostage takings. Please do answer how this is a better solution then stopping the leak at the source. Also by killing them they are less likely to turn into martyrs because less people will hear of the killings and less sympathy will be given to them and strengthen our resolve. 3. Alright cool chalk one up for the good guys. 4. Um so you agreed with me at the beginning but never really said anything after like you said you would so Ill just move on. 5. The US isn't as out of the loop as you might want them to be. We do have leads and we can follow up on them. What I am arguing for is that known terrorists should be killed not people with a sketchy guess at being terrorists. 6. To group a lot of your arguments to fight such an extreme killing method must be matched with something more than a moderate half assed attempt to stop them. If Bush has shown us anything its that fighting moderately and half assed will get you no where. To end Ill reiterate its not just people we think might kinda be terrorists, this does not make us terrorists just the opposite. We bring peace to a world that has all but consumed itself in chaos by those who choose to live as terrorists. Thank you SolaGratia