There is undeniable evidence that God exists

First, my opponent made the odd connection between a comic book and the Bible. He said, "The adventures of Joe Messiah are absolutely true though because you say so. You can't simply claim the Bible is historical, when its not, and suppose that that meets your burden of proof, because it doesn't. " It isn't just me that says it. My first constructive listed several Biblical scholars who have verified the Bible's accuracy and reliability. Actually, Lee Strobel, a former atheist like yourself, thought the Bible to be reliable and accurate. (. http://www.leestrobel.com...) Also, you brought up the PBS video. You DO realize that PBS uses the Bible as a historical reference, right? Your own source considers the Bible to be reliable. Secondly, my opponent mentioned his experience with his picture evolving on a computer. I would like to thank my opponent for helping my point. Allow me to go back my first analogy: the computer is created by a person. Although the computer itself may have been random, a creator was behind the program he used to make his picture, after all :) My opponent says, "The existence of a 10th century Israel wouldn't prove the Bible correct on the issue of God. " No, but that's not all I was proving. I've given you evidence of David's existence throughout various parts of this debate. You can deny the name "King David" written on ancient artifacts, but that doesn't change the fact that his name is on them and he truly did exist. Thirdly, my opponent brings up, "God doesn't explain anything and isn't a model for understanding the the world. " God explains more than evolution does. There are still questions with the Big Bang theory and Evolution, but the undeniable existence of a God explains everything. I find it humorous that my opponent claimed my evidence to be foolish, yet he provided no evidence to back up any of his statements. I would like to list all of the assertions my opponent brought up without any evidence to back them up: 1)The Bible is not reliable 2)The Bible depicts a vast number of events which did not actually occur 3)The translations of the Bible changed over time 4)There is no evidence that King David or King Solomon existed 5)Further claims about Biblical records are found to be false 6)The "social movement" taken out of context from the story of Judges I asked one simple thing from my opponent: to give me some evidence that God doesn't exist. However, he failed to do so. If my opponent can't even take the time to give me a simple answer or a site (because he so blatantly believes God doesn't exist) then he should have been able to give me a few sentences explaining why He doesn't. If my opponent can't even defend his own claims, then there is no doubt I have won this debate. My opponent can bash the evidence I gave, but at least I gave some. I gave scholar names, article links, etc. while my opponent gave a site and a couple of videos. I ask that you vote, not on what you believe, but who provided the most evidence in this debate. I have won on not only evidence, but on logic and arguments throughout this debate. Conclusively, my opponent can insult me however he chooses, but it doesn't change the fact that I'm right. Check my evidence—look at my sources! Then I would ask you to look at the evidence (or lack thereof) that my opponent provided. And because I have given undeniable evidence of God's existence, I respectfully urge an affirmative on your ballot. Thank you.