The god of the bible and the bible has no place in a modern civilized society

“Sorry I did not in any way contradict MYSELF. Its you and your christian ideals that do ---always--- no exceptions, none.”Wrong.Here is the contradiction you presented:“Since the laws of the LORD are perfect they can NEVER change. And yet they do by PEOPLE. Simple.”They can never change and yet people do change them according to you? This is a contradiction. You can deny it until you turn blue in the face. I eagerly await a correction to the above statement on your part.“After all if god"s word is supposed to be perfect and according to the people who read YOUR bible, in which they clearly don"t”Aside from being a bare assertion and characterisation on your part grouping people that “clearly don’t” read the Bible, I find this both wrong and hypocritical quite frankly. I’ve posted various contexts to the scriptures you have posted and you have ignored them without tackling any of them. For the sake of rational debate, I eagerly await your actual refutations to my refuting of your arguments thus far.“in which they clearly don"t which is rather point blank obvious and certainly with no understanding or comprehension, like you and nearly 100% of those that claim themselves to be christians”This isn’t even an argument - this is an ad-hom attack at me.You assert again that Jesus changed the laws of the Old Testament - I’m still waiting for your evidence of this.“...such as breaking the sabbath ion which required the death penalty but nah not to jesus in which he was found to be not strung up by his butterball nuts and or stoned to death.”Where’s the evidence for this assertion? Nowhere does Jesus get rid of the 7th day sabbath - In the Church that I am representing - the original, Catholic Church, the sabbath day still stands for Jesus didn’t get rid of it at all. It now goes by the Lord’s Day. Jesus himself stipulates that it’s not work he was doing on the Sabbath, but good and he confirmed that he was “Lord, even of the Sabbath” (Matt 12:1-8, Mark 2:23-28, Luke 6:1-5) . He never broke it and never got rid of it. You completely made that up it seems.“So YOU contradicted. YOURSELF.”Where I’ve actually given you the quote where you contradicted yourself, you have failed to provide evidence where I have made a contradiction. Another baseless assertion on your part.“1 Pet 1:24-25, Is 40:8: Um no its the exact same thing as the above that NOBODY can change the word of YOUR god.”And I’ll say it again. The “word of God” here is not a reference to every word uttered by God. It’s referring to the promise of salvation made to the nation of Israel, for which Peter also references. Peter specifically says that Jesus was the promise that had come. Please refer to the contexts of these two passages. All you have done is cherry picked the verse out of it’s context and stated it means something completely contrary to what it actually means. I’ll make the statement again - these passages have nothing to do with the law. That’s you and your video refuted. And to back this up, allow me to post the context which you seemingly keep ignoring. I will be highlighting in bold text the key passages that show that the "word" (singular, not plural - not "words") of God that's being spoken of is a promise and not literally every word, otherwise Peter would write using the plurality of words.1 Pet 1:14 - 13 Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ. 14 As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance: 15 But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; 16 Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy. 17 And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear: 18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; 19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: 20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you, 21 Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God. 22 Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently: 23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever. 24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof fadeth away: 25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.Notice the last part of the passage especially: "And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you." They're preaching of hope and sanctification in Jesus. They already knew the law. They weren't preached the law again. Again, this passage has NOTHING to do with the law. It's about salvation/sanctification looking to the hope they were promised of, which is Jesus. The Gospel of Jesus was preached to them.Peter's message is based on the following passage in Isaiah 40:1-11. I will give the passage which my opponent has quoted (verse 8) in it's context, which my opponent has also completely disregarded and ignored. The reason for this is it's apparent it shoots down his argument and the video he keeps accusing me of ignoring (which I haven't - I'm tackling it head on right now). Again, I will be highlighting the key parts of the passage which again show that the word (singular - not "words") of God which stand forever isn't a reference to the law, but a reference to the hope for Israel)Is 40:1-11 1 Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God. 2 Speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem, and cry unto her, that her warfare is accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned: for she hath received of the LORD's hand double for her sins. 3 The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God (fulfilled when John preached Christ in the wilderness who was the hope for Israel - the PROMISED messiah). 4 Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low: and the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough places plain: 5 And the glory of the LORD shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it. 6 The voice said, Cry. And he said, What shall I cry? All flesh is grass, and all the goodliness thereof is as the flower of the field: 7 The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: because the spirit of the LORD bloweth upon it: surely the people is grass. 8 The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever. 9 O Zion, that bringest good tidings, get thee up into the high mountain; O Jerusalem, that bringest good tidings, lift up thy voice with strength; lift it up, be not afraid; say unto the cities of Judah, Behold your God! 10 Behold, the Lord GOD will come with a strong hand, and his arm shall rule for him: behold, his reward is with him, and his work before him. 11 He shall feed his flock like a shepherd: he shall gather the lambs with his arm, and carry them in his bosom, and shall gently lead those that are with young.“Yeah but YOUR god orders you to kill homosexuals.”No he doesn’t. I’ve already given you many many passages that show why we don’t kill homosexuals or adulterers and i've also given you cultural reasons for why homosexuals aren't killed - refer to the passage about Jesus and the adulteress as a case in point. And as I’ve stipulated, the law didn’t include the punishment - it only included the crime. Please see the following link from a Jewish source giving all 613 laws. None of them include the commission to kill homosexuals.https://www.chabad.org...“you do not follow that law because you know its totally 100% absurd.”The law isn’t absurd - the culture in my society has nothing to do with the culture in the Jewish society in Israel at that time. The law didn’t include the punishment. If it did, I highly doubt I’d be converting to the Catholic Church. I’m understanding of cultural applications.“you have a 0% chance of redeeming yourself at all and have no knowledge or insight to what the giant ball bearings rolling down your neck into your feeble mud battery operated big black blank hole you call a brain.”Are you going to debate instead of giving ad-hom attacks?“Your next argument (should you be stupid enough to post one) will be dutifully and rightly ignored. You had your chance and wow did you blow it.”Another ad-hom.----------------In the first round, my opponent attacked strawmen, ripped passages out of their immediate context, misunderstood the meaning of the law and conflated the culture of Israel at that time with the culture of our societies today.In the second round, my opponent stuck by the same strawmen that i've already highlighted, still rips out passages of their immediate context, accused me of contradicting myself with no evidence whatsoever, conflated societies and has also ad-hom attacked me and other Christians with no basis.So far, my rebuttals to his arguments have been left with no return. I eagerly await a formal debate for the remaining rounds, where my opponent can actually tackle the points I make instead of attacking me, my character or misrepresenting my position.