Genetically modified foods should be banned

This following scenarios are completely made up, I'll elaborate on the 'moral' of it later on in this argument. Okay, so there is this (made up) fruit called "ancipitis" that is released into the supermarket shelves with no mention of the potentially harmful modifications that have been planted into them during production. This means that the customers, of whom are purchasing 'ancipitis', have no idea that by buying this product, they are putting their lives are risk. Over time, various health experts and companies decide to run tests on these new fruits, and find the harmful chemicals that have been used to make the product more appealing, by changing the colour/s, enlarging them and making 'ancipitis' taste better. These experts release the news to the public, and it eventually goes viral. 1) The government gets a hold of this information and decides to review the 'ancipitis' and find that these people were correct in thinking that the fruit was harmful. Without telling the public why, the government bans the production and trade of 'ancipitis'. The public is concerned for around a year, but finally lets go of the fact that the fruit is never coming back. *20 or so years later* Since the ban, a new generation of humans has grown up. They look into the banning of 'ancipitis' and don't find any evidence suggesting that this fruit had ACTUALLY posed as a threat. Yes, there was evidence supporting the potential health risk/, but no elaboration. The public was told that the fruit was harmful, but not educated about it's risks. The people researching 'ancipitis' ask reliable sources about the ban, and come to a conclusion that there was nothing to support the government's decision. They bring the fruit back. 2) Instead of banning the fruit, the governments look into the issue. They conduct experiments, and find people whose health has been damaged due to the modifications in the fruit. They finally decide to educate a vast majority of their population on the 'risks' or eating this fruit.(just as we are educated on the risks involved with smoking). The people decide to take action, protesting and warning others about the dangers. People stop buying 'ancipitis', running the companies (who produce it) into bankruptcy and finally stopping production/modifications on the fruits. You're arguing that you'd like to completely ban genetically modified foods, which has it's positive and negative points. You'll be getting rid of them, but not forever. Eventually banning the foods is even worse, it's exactly the same as banning them straight away except you're almost giving the public a chance to 'rebel' against the decisions. Time for them to think about the decisions. I do agree, however, that these genetically modified foods are dangerous and inhumane. We're taking some of our freshest produce and ruining it's positive properties for the sake of money and business. Although, when I was on a study tour, we went to a place called the CSIRO*. They explained how their labs modify foods so that they prevent diseases or infestations. One of their projects was going to Africa and planting a field of modified mandarin seeds, these plants served a purpose OTHER than creating a flowing income. Maybe, when educating people, emphasise the dangers of DIGESTING the foods rather than genetically modified foods as a whole. *I do not remember the whole story, as it was two years ago, but I believe that this gets to the 'main point'. ->Again, I'm sorry if this doesn't make sense, I'm tired... again... sorry