Why the Boston Celtics will not win the NBA title

Enemy Thanks for the advice, but I didn't come up with this debate in the hopes that someone will educate me the basic of arguing. Also, I'm well aware that I didn't include any factors, so lets stop stating the obvious, bro. Oh and I think I have a keen understanding of what a teams regular season record means, wins and loses, yada yada yaa, but thanks for clearly that up for me. "Pierce over Prince any day". What is this, where are your facts and stats. If you are expecting people to side with your debate because of that statement, then I'd hate to get your hopes up, dawg. The Pistons aren't the only team in the east that poses some threat. The Orlando Magic is a equally powerful team. But lets forget the east, the topic of this debate is weather they'll win the title, not the Eastern Conference. (Please pay a little more attention) Also, even though a regular season record might foreshadow results in the playoffs, it's not enough evidence to bank on. Look at last year for example, the Dallas Mavericks; lost in the first round to the Golden State Warriors. Not only did the Mavs have the best record in the league, but the highest PPG, % from the line, among many other stats, and by far the deepest and best bench in the league. Lost 4-2. 1. 23-3 is impressive, but the Celtics haven't played the cream of the crop yet. The Mavs, Spurs, and Suns. These are the nights that matter, not the games between the garbage NY Knicks and other Eastern Conference chumps. The Eastern Conference is, to be blunt, a joke compared to the west. The west is well over .500 against the east so far this season. Two league powerhouses, Dallas and Phoenix, both average more against opponents at home and on the road, then the Celtics do. 2. The Celtics have one of the weakest benches in the league. The elite 4 players of their bench, average a depressing 6 ppg, 1.25 apg, and 3.5 rpg. The elite 4 of the mavericks bench average 10 ppg, 3 apg, and 5 rpg. Teams cannot win a championship without a good bench. Look at the defending champs, the Spurs, they have multiple championships due it part to their dependable and consistent bench. 3. Celtics: PG: Rajon Rondo SG: Ray Allen SF: Paul Pierce PF: Kevin Garnett C: Kendrick Perkins Pistons: PG- Chauncey Billups SG - Richard Hamilton SF - Tayshaun Prince PF - Rasheed Wallace C - Antonio McDyess Both teams average about the same numbers. The Pistons lead by a fraction in most fields. However, this shouldn't be overlooked. Whatever the difference is, even if it's a decimal point, it matters. I.E. The Pistons 2 point win over the Celtics earlier this season. 4. Another thing the Celtics lack, is experience. As a unit, they don't have any. The Pistons won that close game in December because of their experience. They've been in many similar situations, and know how to react. After the game Chauncey Billups told reporters, "We been there done that." The Celtics have not "been there done that". A big attribute, that is missing in Bean town. The Mavs, Suns, and Spurs, the three best teams in the league, are in a similar scenarios as the Pistons. This gives them a huge advantages over their opponents. My arguments (Final): 1. Boston is not the best team. 2. A regulars season record is not enough evidence to declare the best team in the league. 3. Plenty of reasons why they would lose (week conference/division, easy scheduale/ still early in the season, and they haven‘t played the three best teams in the league yet) 4. F your bets pal -hold on dees buster