BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
abortion should be illegal

I have challenged the proposal of the opposing house for a few distinct reasons. The Honourable opposition wishes to make abortion illegal and as such make it unavailable. This would be detrimental to society in some cases where I believe abortion is a perceived alternative to childbirth. I am in fact against abortion for those who just couldn't be bothered putting a lid on it but there are still a number of cases where abortion is seen as the best option. The first case where abortion would be viable would be in the case that a committee of doctors have grave concern for the health of the mother would be placed in danger were she to go through labour and childbirth. This could be due to a genetic heart defect, high blood pressure or Haemophilia. The vast majority of world religions teach that you should not knowingly put your life or your well being in jeopardy when you have the means to avoid such a situation from occurring. If we were to apply the sanctity of life in this case, wouldn't it be the case that the life of the mother is also precious and as such should not be risked unnecessarily. A second situation where I think abortion would be desirable would be in the case of rape victims who are impregnated through no fault of their own. The pregnancy and the subsequent child would be a constant torture upon the emotions of those who never had a choice in the matter. The mother would no doubt be scarred for life emotionally and as such may not be able to treat her offspring in the way in which it deserves to be treated. I also believe that it would be better for the child itself that it was not brought up in such circumstances. Imagine the emotional purgatory which would result from being raised as an only child and then being told that you never got to know your father because he was a rapist who brutally attacked the person who raised you. These are the 2 most obvious points that I can put forward against the illegalisation of abortion. There are others but I feel these are the 2 most potent in a modern society where there is better awareness of these circumstances.
abortion should be illegal

I think that abortion should be illegal because it takes away a life. here are a list of other reasons why abortion is wrong. 1) A FETUS CAN FEEL Even though it may not be fully formed, a fetus in the second trimester is still able to feel pain 2)As unbelievable as this may sound, your hard earned taxes go toward keeping abortion clinics running. Think about that for a moment: your taxes, which could instead be distributed to worthwhile programs such as the NRA or Fox Hunters of America, are being pumped into facilities which condone taking life. 3)ALL LIFE IS SACRED 4)ABORTION IS MURDER in conclusion abortion is wrong because you are taking away an innocent defenseless life.
Is Peyton Manning a better Quarterback than Tom Brady? Also, list 3 reasons why or why not.

My opponent has basically contradicted himself. You need to win games in order to win championships. In 2007, Brady threw 50 touchdowns and only 8 interceptions, which meant he had better than a 6-1 touchdown to interception ratio. My opponent has not refuted any of my round 2 arguments, which means they still stand. Also, I have provided stats for why Brady is a better quarterback than Manning. My opponent has gone by opinion. Thank you.
Is Peyton Manning a better Quarterback than Tom Brady? Also, list 3 reasons why or why not.

I disagree. Becuase while Manning was in Indianapolis, he had star players to help him like Reggie Wayne and Marvin Harrison. And now in Denver, he has star players like Wes Welker and Demaryius Thomas. Brady also lead his team to a 16-0 regular season record in 2007, and has a career playoff record of 18-8, compared to Peyton Manning who is 11-11. Brady is better when it matter most. Thank you.
Is Peyton Manning a better Quarterback than Tom Brady? Also, list 3 reasons why or why not.

I accept. Here are 3 reasons why I believe Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning: 1: Tom Brady has won more Super Bowls, 3-1 2: Brady leads the head to head series 11-5 3: Tom Brady leads the head to head series in the AFC Championship game I hope this helps. Thank you.
Time is a verb.

Ok, I give up. I've read your last argument 5 times and I'm not sure whether it's beyond my comprehension or incomprehensible. The biggest problem with time, In my opinion, Is the language. We do time. We move through time. Time flows. Time dilated. These terms are paradoxical. There is no one definition of time which satisfies every one of these terms. This is why nobody has been able to come up with a definition of what time is. Is it a force? Is it a type of ether through which things move, Or is the ether moving and carrying us along? Or, Is time just a construct of the human mind? Just measurements of duration? How long it takes something to happen? It's time, For a new approach. Let me pose a question. Does motion exist? Obviously things can move, But, Is motion a construct of the mind or a physical phenomena? My answer, It's a physical phenomena. It's not a physical object, It's something which physical objects do. Motion is a verb. It's something which we can physically measure, So it's definitely not a construct of the mind. Einstein said, "time is what clocks measure! " If we can measure it, It's not a mental construct. So, What are we measuring? Well, A measuring tape can be used in two ways. We can measure the length of an object and we can measure how far an object moves. Time is like the latter. The problem is the term space-time. It gives people the impression that time is something we move through, The same way we move through space. A much better term would be temp-space. Temp, For the temporal dimension, And space, For the spatial dimension. So we time through the temporal dimension and we move through the spatial dimension. Einstein's theory of relativity actually shows us the relationship between moving and timing. The faster we move, The slower we time. So time is a physical phenomena. It's something which everyone and everything in the universe does, Except for massless particles. They don't time, They only move.
Time is a verb.

Yeah, Space " time, I think what you need is the math key to calibrate time to the universe, Space-time, They are". . Readings, Two readings, But it is due to the two shapes in the same area and it is only the volume that changes inside dimension of shape. There is only one area. Volume change is from variance probability in scale, As shape is not equal by proportion and only figuratively relative, The difference between two shapes must be calculated and calibrated in a mathematic scale. Energy matter reoccurrence is still not time, We travel back in time when moving particular direction that is along a series of time zones. We move forward in time when moving the opposite direction along the formulated time zones. Time is dimensional when it is formulated to be synchronized with other identical applications of principle called time, Or simply itself. The only reason we do not move forward and backward in time at the same instant is due to the way we create a calendar year using science and math. As earth will not fly the opposite direction of its orbits around the sun. Though if we travel in a ship designed for that type journey. A motion in the opposite orbit of earth would be all that is required to moving both backward and forwards in time. At one instant. Even if names as titles of the recording values are year, Month, Week, And day, Day, Hour, Minute, Second, And subdivision of ante meridiem-before midday and post meridiem " after midday. The day of time is not equal to the day of the calendar year as they are not the same mathematic principle it is not just the speed of their motion. So how does space-time show a magnetic north is the universe? North star?
Time is a verb.

Space-time consists of two dimensions, Not one. A dimension is an area in which things exist and through which things move. Time is not a dimension. Time is our motion through the temporal dimension. The fact that we call space, 3 dimensional, Refers to the number of planes which exist in the spatial dimension. We can move forward or backward, But never at the same time. The same applies to left and right, Or, Up and down. The temporal dimension has only one plane. Past and future, And, We can only time towards the future.
Time is a verb.

There is one dimension it is not only called time, It is also called area, Space, Volume, And dimension, They become demission/abdication of a numerical state, Dimension is demoted to both time and space, Not time then space. Time simple has a process space does not by mathematical principle to remove Pi. Pi a mathematical process itself which dates far back in history as precedent to Babylonia, Or better. A process which mathematically creates irrational numerical values when calculated in area of it"s on birth the circle. The irrational numerical state can then be shared with other mathematic principles. Creating a relative state in mathematics without truth in practice as the state of value is then proximity. This shared proximity is held in decimal value, Time in principle that starts in a numeric factional state with the help of semicolon, So it is then a play on direction by laws of mathematics, Becoming either a larger decimal value, In ratio a smaller portion, Or a whole number a larger portion. This is the true reason why it uses motion in its formula. Any straight line including diameter"s continually bent into an equal arc by use of tangent, Will at some point of the bending process form a circle. Therefor Pi can simple be mathematically removed by using algebra in connection to scale with ratio creating a rational state of numerical value. (Rights Reserved) Demission- Abdication- https://www. Merriam-webster. Com/dictionary/abdication
Time is a verb.

Yes, Ok. 60 seconds, Make a minute. 60 minutes, Make an hour. 24 hours, Make a day. Let's compare. 100 cm make a meter. 1000 meters, Makes a kilometre. They have different increments, But operate on the same principle. Now, I can do 2 things with a tape measure. I can measure the length of an object, Or, I can measure how far an object moves. I'm sure most of you know what an odometer is. It keeps track of how far your car drives. Well, A clock is our planet's version of an odometer. It keeps track of the earth's rotation. We've just broken one complete rotation into 24 subsections, And further divided each of those subsections into 60 mini-subsections, And then divided those 60 mini-subsections into a further 60 micro-subsections. When we move from A to B, We are not only moving a certain distance in the spatial dimension, We're also moving a certain distance in the temporal dimension. Speed is calculated by dividing our spatial displacement, By our temporal displacement. Aka, Distance over time. Einstein said, "time is what clocks measure". They measure how far we time, The way an odometer measures how far we move.
Time is a verb.

Time is a single mathematic formula which uses degrees of a circle to calculate area, It can be calibrated equally in any demission as the directional distance in mathematic space with an application of absolute. It then is synchronized to itself. There are five set demission explained in times first state of time is day, Then hour, Followed by minute, With second as an end of proportional scale, And the day is repeated as a addition dimension with letters am or pm. This complete math principal is describing an area inside, And outside a circle by size, Area, Or volume. With lines attached to a second and third circle. The demission"s in mathematic space are described as area inside a cube with numerical values set in direction x, Y, And z. Unlike space area, Time area has no 90 degree angle of its own at its circumference, The unique trait of all circles in principle to angles requires it must be set by human application, Or in the case of atomic time not set at all. To explain to any reader a cube by number is (1 -40) 10 and 30 from center of the cube do not equal the distance from 5 and 25 from center of the cube. Middle Corner to middle opposite side corner is not the same as center to middle side opposite side center to middle side. A circle by number is (1 -360) and the distance from 1 and 2 are as equal from center as the numbers from 1 and 90, Or 1-180, Or even 1 and 359. https://www. Worldtimezone. Com/ Time is not something we all do. It is something we can all use, And like all math some of us can do the time calculation wrong. The speed at which we perceive time may not always be equal. This unequal feeling is not the same as violation of basic mathematic principle. In complex mathematics. Time is a calibrated general mathematic principle to aid navigation on earth. It is a required math principle in calculations made with a sextant. Finding latitude. https://www. Wikihow. Com/Use-a-Sextant
Time is a verb.

Our universe exists in 2 dimensions. One spatial and one temporal. The terms here and now, Describe our current location in each dimension, Respectively. Both here and now are not fixed locations. We're constantly moving. In the spatial dimension we move from here to there, And there becomes our new here. In the temporal dimension we move from now to then and, Then becomes our new now. The similarities between motion through the spatial dimension and timing through the temporal dimension, Are undeniable. Time is something we do, As is pointed out by the justice system. If found guilty, You do time behind bars.
Time is a verb.

Thank and as always I enjoyed our debate. The Big problem with time""""". ? There are two problems not just one. The trigonometry is not consistent, And science is trying to prove time is comprised of energy and matter not math. Time had one error before the 1950"s directly related to its public use, Now it has 2 errors in 2019. We are going backward. That is a motion it means we are moving away. A number value has been increased in the wrong direction. Time is Trigonometry, Space is Algebra, And the money is in the translation of the linear state they both have. How to use a compass. The magnetic constant. https://www. Rei. Com/learn/expert-advice/navigation-basics. Html Does motion exist? Is motion a construct of the mind or a physical phenomenon? ** If motion did not exist a compass & sextant would not be a realistic tool. ** Physical phenomenon it is something objects do as a verb to a velocity and is physically measured. Einstein said "Time is what clocks measure! " If we can measure time, It"s not a mental construct. So, What are we measuring? First: More than one question. Second: It doesn"t sound like a person who has given up. Cheeky Bass- tart"""lol! Third: The argument time is a verb is in relationship to an Einstein mathematic accusation made by rule of algebra in relationship to Pi, With only the one motion Pi portrays, Mathematically exhibits, Expansion of scale. The expansion is a motion set in with a real velocity, Yet it holds no whole vector motion from a fix position in space at the same instant. It is often weighed in how an object ages, Withers, And deteriorate. Time is a principle that is formulated between the readings of a clock and the compass. It was first identified by the use of two mirrors, A telescope, With numerical degrees using a sextant and velocity. In not knowing/using a sextant with a compass people simply do not understand time is a form of math placing a lines, Bent on an arc to the points of a circumference that would normally be a straight line. It is NOT the motion itself. ( Clock plus Compass equals time. )
bacon is better with ketchup

Anyway you look at it bacon is great, but the flavors can be enhanced with a bit of ketchup. Alone bacon has that yummy, salty, meaty, warm beef jerky flavor. Then with the sweet flavor of ketchup, you really bring that out. You get two great flavors in your mouth. It is literally a flavor party in your mouth and who doesn't like a good party. Or as my friends down south say. A fiesta.
bacon is better with ketchup

You said: "Bacon goes best with maple syrup." And to this I oppose. though I have tried maple syrup with bacon, and it is good, but it does not compare to the great taste of bacon with ketchup. My opponent says:"Sadly ketchup simply cannot produce the same affect (as maple syrup), the acidic taint of the tomato takes away all of that yummy, salty, meaty, warm beef jerky flavor." This would be true if you were to dip the whole piece of bacon into the ketchup, but this is not what happens while eating. To have the great sensation that I am talking about, you only dip the bacon a little per bite. Thus it does not cover the taste of the bacon with its "acidic taint." I hope this has clarified to the audience that bacon goes best with ketchup.
bacon is better with ketchup

While bacon is good, bacon mixed with ketchup is nothing short of a fallacy. Bacon is good with any number of things and accompanies them excellently, unfortunately for my opponent ketchup is not listed with these others. Bacon goes best with maple syrup. That covers the sweet taste argument and creates, as my friends back east would say, a bar mitzvah in your mouth. Sadly ketchup simply cannot produce the same affect, the acidic taint of the tomato takes away all of that yummy, salty, meaty, warm beef jerky flavor. So simply replace ketchup with some delicious maple syrup and you have your perfect breakfast side dish, or main course.
Feminism is no longer beneficial in America

SUBPOINT A: My CONRAD study made addressing your first 4 sources obsolete. The judges do not have to accept them as true. I'm new to this site, but I've never seen any sort of a debate where one of the debaters tells the judges what they have to do. You also made your opening statement a rebuttal, which was quite unfair. SUBPOINT B: I do not have the burden of proving that there are biological differences that result in men working more full time jobs than women, this burden of proof relies on "Con". As for your second point, it seems like you are asking me to prove that having a child is a biological action - I'll let that question answer itself. Third, the CONRAD study answers the question of why mothers work less while they have a child, as does my previous source [3]. The CONRAD study does not support Con's point that women are "unfairly treated in promotion"; you cannot prove unfair promotion bias unless you examine the resumes of every applicant. Con failed to investigate my source for my assertion that women are biologically disposed to not seek higher paying jobs. SUBPOINT A: Gamergate can be summed up in one video [1]. If Con had taken the time to view my videos, they would have seen the blatant examples of violence committed by feminists. Also, Con is using "rationalwiki" as a source; using rationalwiki as a source is akin to using conservapedia. SUBPOINT B: 1. k 2. Strawman. I never said that there was a feminist conspiracy. As for The Amazing Atheist's rape jokes, they are just that. Jokes. 3. I am not an advocate for the Republican party. 4. How does "sample text" mean anything? Am I being trolled right now..........? 5. New source [1] 6. Critiquing the word "feminism" is impossible, because even though they don't agree with each other, the majority respond to criticism in the same way. 7. I'm quite sorry 8. Can you imagine what the reaction would have been if it had been two feminists protesting, and a man slapped one of them? It is a total double standard. That video highlights the hypocrisy of feminism. SUMMARY Am I being trolled? How does "sample text" prove anything? I'm very confused right now. Also, I'd like to repeat that I didn't know I was supposed to open with a full on argument, and someone in the comments even reprimanded Con for doing so. [1]
Feminism is no longer beneficial in America

1. I apologize for not including sources; this is my first debate on this website and I thought that I was supposed to be making a "blanket opening statement" of sorts, if you will. 2. The wage gap is completely false. The original study used to generate the wage gap is extremely misleading; the wage gap all but vanishes when you factor in hours worked, rank, etc. [1]. There is a difference between "earn" and "pay". Men earn more than women, but they are not paid more than women. According to the CONSAD report concerning disparagement of women in the work place, women are less likely to seek higher paying jobs, apply for promotions, work as many hours, and even request raises [1]. Many modern day feminists like to attribute this to the so called "patriarchy"; however, no such thing exists. Women are more likely to victimize themselves than men [2], which leads to the internal feeling of oppression. As for the "promotion bias", just because men are more likely to be promoted, does not mean that there is a bias among employers; it is more likely that the men in question were simply more ambitious or prepared for the next rank up [1]. 3. My use of the word "juggernaut" was an implication of the cyber-lynch mob surrounding feminism in the media; if you critique it publicly, you will be harassed. 1: Feminism was not a juggernaut in the media in the past because it was confined to television and public events - with the rise of social media, feminism has been able to spread rapidly across America. The term "media" is not the same today as it was in the past [3] [4] 2: Feminism is a juggernaut in the media. It is spreading lies so efficiently, that even the POTUS has quoted the false wage gap statistic [5]. Critiquing feminism will lead to harassment and possibly violence - as soon as feminism garners an outspoken opponent, they are berated and shunned. [6] [4] 3: Feminism being a juggernaut in the media is bad, because it negates any ability to critique it, which in turn is an imposition on censoring freedom of speech. 4: What 5: As I stated previously, feminism cannot be critiqued without repercussion. Thus, my justification for using the word "juggernaut". [4] [6] [7] 6: Feminism is not a unified group at all; rather it is made up of many subgroups who cannot seem to agree with one another on what constitutes "feminism". There are the man-haters [8], the whiners [9], and the intersectional feminists [10]. These groups (any many others) all claim to be the "true" feminists. That is a major no true Scotsman fallacy. 7: See 3 & 5 8: The feminists are imposing upon freedom of speech [2] [11], and physically assaulting people. [11] [12] [1] http://www.consad.com... [2] http://www.ukessays.com... [3] http://www.socialnomics.net... [4] [5] http://www.washingtonexaminer.com... [6] [7] https://books.google.com... [8] SCUM Manifesto (Valerie Solanas, 1967), p. 1 [9] [10] http://everydayfeminism.com... [11] [12]