The existence of evil proves God must exist

REBUTTALS:"The non-Christian German Philosopher, Immanuel Kant, gives proof for this point in this article"This is an appeal to authority fallacy[1]. Pro just claims Immanuel Kant is right without any explanation. Immanuel Kant does not list the belief in evil in every society. Therefore, Pro's point remains refuted.[1]http://www.nizkor.org..."This is one of many historic articles discussing this fact. "Pro, doesn't seem to understand, what evidence does Pro have that the Germans who killed Jews were upset when Russians raped German evidence? My opponent did not provide any proof or an explanation. Instead we are left with a wikipedia article that remains unexplained. Therefore, Pro has offered another appeal to authority fallacy[1]."This statement is based purely on history."Again, another appeal to authority fallacy on the part of Pro[1]. On top of that Pro doesn't answer my question. "How does my opponent know all Southern plantation owners felt [that stealing their slaves was wrong]?" Key word is "all.""My opponent did state their opinion though in Round 1 when they said, “my opponent and I may find human trafficking to be "evil"(I hope he does)”. As for how I know they believe things were wrong, see replies 3 & 4."This is an outright lie. I only stated my opinion on human trafficking. I never gave an opinion on German soldiers killing Jews, Russians raping women, nor did I give an opinion on slave owners. My opponent is lying here because I was responding to his Round 2 statement(see below). Again, the last sentence y Pro is another appeal to authority fallacy.Pro's Round 2 statement:"Many German soldiers had no problem with murdering Jews, but when Russians raped their women, they viewed that as wrong, or evil. Southern plantation owners may have viewed their cruel treatment of slaves as ok, but if someone stole one of their slaves, they viewed that as wrong. Both people groups committed action which we would declare heinous, but they approved of, but both groups still believed certain things were wrong.""Since one can cause harm or injury, no matter where or when they are, then, by definition, evil exists in all civilizations."Wrong, it said "morally bad" as well which Pro intentionally ignored. Pro also ignored evil is an adjective. Therefore by default, the concept of evil will be relative. The point still stands, Pro never has proved how evil exists in all civilizations."Please keep this discussion professional. Misspellings, poor grammar and asking for votes does not add to your argument. My intent is strictly to gain information for a paper I am writing, not to win an Internet debate."If we observe Pro's statements above, it is clear, Pro is making a bold attempt to derail the debate with inconsequential banter. Poor arguments, fallacies, and unsubstantiated claims which are all relevant to the debate's resolution have caused Pro's downfall. Pro knows it so he attempts to throw dirt in our eyes to blind us with hollow rhetoric as a distraction. No one should be deceived. FINAL QUESTIONS TO THE VOTERS:Did Pro meet the resolution?Did Pro show us any evidence that evil exists?Did Pro show us the existence of evil proves the existence of God?Did Pro correlate the existence of evil with the existence of God?If Pro failed to show us a correlation between evil and God, how can he claims one causes the other?CONCLUSION:Pro failed to show us any evidence on how the existence of evil proves the existence of God? Pro showed us according to his own reasoning that evil is generated by humans. Therefore, Pro's case is taciturn and unresponsive to the resolution.Vote early, Vote often, and Vote Con. Then send a friend request.