The 4th Dimension is imagination

Again, This argument is a bit difficult to understand because of the poor grammar, Though I have tried my absolute best to interpret it as generously as possible. Pro says that time is not a separate coordinate, It's actually a combination of xyz. This does not make sense at all. A given axis/coordinate plane is exclusive of all others. There is only one type of measurement that can be taken within a given dimension, By definition. Pro's key point here is that he/she can arrange a meeting at a specific time and location by using distances between various objects from specific perspectives. He/she goes on to state, "Answer that question and explain how not in that exampme [sic]. " I will now, Unequivocally, Do exactly that: This could not possibly be more incorrect. For simplicity's sake, It is very easy to see that the specific perspective Pro mentioned will lead to the same answer once per year. Without specifying which year, Or saying something like, "the next time ___ is ___ inches from ___, Etc", Which is an invocation of time, It would be utterly impossible to know when the meeting will take place. (The particular example Pro provides would also be completely impractical. Using things like "inches" when holding "fingers" to determine time using relative position of heavenly bodies would never work. One would need extremely precise measurement devices, Telescopes, And the like, To make this work. That does not mean it is impossible in theory, Just in practice. However, I would concentrate more on the first issue as that pokes an enormous hole in Pro's argument, Both in theory and in practice). This should be all that is necessary to have thoroughly disprove the crux of Pro's argument. He/she provides no scientific/mathematical backing for his/her assertions. Rather, They use what they consider to be "common sense", Despite the fact that the logic is completely flawed (at best). Pro goes on to say that imagination must be the 4th dimension based on the idea that he/she can feel in their mind that I was one block away. This is utter nonsense. One cannot possibly know something like this with any accuracy. Pro states, "But there is an added coordinate because i can percieve your location as if i am there though i am not. " First of all, One absolutely cannot perceive another's location as if they are there purely out of imagination. Of course, They can "imagine" this, But they can never know for sure. Beyond that, Even if some sort of ESP or Psychokinesis existed, There is no fathomable reason why we should suppose this represents a higher dimension, Let alone the one immediately beyond the x-y-z coordinate system. Here are a number of scientific sources speaking to the higher dimensions that exist in our universe, None of which are "imagination": http://mkaku. Org/home/articles/hyperspace-a-scientific-odyssey/ https://web2. Ph. Utexas. Edu/~coker2/index. Files/4d. Shtml https://aeon. Co/essays/how-many-dimensions-are-there-and-what-do-they-do-to-reality http://www. Pbs. Org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2014/04/how-many-dimensions-does-the-universe-really-have/ https://www. Popularmechanics. Com/science/math/a27737/visualize-higher-dimensions/ To summarize this entire debate: Pro has refused to cite one scientific, Mathematical, Or even opinion-based source. They claim that their arguments stand on their own and are based on common sense, But this couldn't be farther from the case Pro has repeatedly demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding of nearly all the concepts touched upon and required to intelligently discuss this topic Pro has not come close to fulfilling the Burden of Proof on top of failing to refute my arguments Pro has used a number of fallacious, Rather non-sensical thought experiments and examples to attempt to prove their point, But has actually done nearly the opposite Pro's grammar and spelling have made much of their writing unintelligible