scientifically inexplicable, apparently supernatural things occur, but not to atheists

Delores, oh Delores!There's the Delores story and it is really compelling... at first glance. However, we can see from the story that she did have multiple corrective surgeries which corrected her spinal posture; the real problem, apparantly, was the hang-over from the percutaneous cordotomy (which sounds like medically induced paralysis from the video) - which Sid Roth (and Delores herself) seem keen to emphasise. Again and again, we hear how nobody in the history of the World has anybody recovered from the terrible, burning, invasive and irreversible effects of the percutaneous cordotomy.I admit that I myself when researching the example was completely taken in by the LIES. The video also talks about how nobody performs the attrocious and barbaric practice of percutaneous cordotomy any more.Now, my attitude all changed when I did some research on percutanous cordotomies:http://www.nhs.uk... It turns out that, counter to Mrs Winder's repeated lies (sorry, I mean claims):1. Percutaneous Cordotomies do not affect motor skills (they target pain nerves not motor nerves).2. Percutaneous Cordotomies are regularly carried out today3. Percutaneous Cordotomies are mostly successful (80%)4. "Serious side effects are extremely rare, affecting less than 1% of patients. "Finally, it's fairly well known that if one area of your brain dies, the natural neuroplasticity of the human brain often allows another part of the brain to step in and do the job of the affected tissue. It is not what I would call miraculous that Delores found that she was regaining some sensation in a leg that had hitherto been permanently numb (but completely under her control - she could walk but often had to watch her leg whilst doing so).So, where's the miracle here? Even by Pro's quoted passage:"This is unusual because the spinathalamic in the spinal cord had been interrupted on both sides, and in such cases the resulting numbness is usually permanent." That doesn't say "this is miraculous", nor does it say that numbness is "always permanent". The author is aware that sometimes the numbess goes away. In other words, Pro has yet to give us a SINGLE credible example of a miraculous healing of a theist. Now, if I haven't provided a single example for an atheist either, you might be tempted to think that we are even... but in the context of the debate, this isn't so: I claim that there is no such thing as a miracle and that anything apparantly miraculous that can happen to a theist can happen to an atheist, so you wouldn't expect me to be able to show any genuine miracles... and I think the lying Delores is a perfect example of why theists are fundamentally dishonest when they stretch the truth to bolster miracle-claims in support of their supernatural beliefs... and how so many gullible people can believe the lies, in this case including Pro. The difference between theists and atheists is not their medical prognoses, it's the degree to which they lie and bleat on and on about miracles.What would be fair is for me to either disprove Pro's positive claims or to provide examples of atheists with equally miraculous recoveries. This, I posit, I have done.If you want direct evidence that atheists (and mormons, and devil-worshippers, in short all people) can recover from Percutanous Cordotomies, look here: http://www.neuros.net...;- you'll find that the procedure is not all that Sid Roth and Delores Whiner cracked it up to be.So, we've looked at cancer and at percutanous cordotomy... and we've found that in every example that Pro gives, atheists are as capable of being restored to health as are theists. Pro's case lies literally in tatters. We've only looked at 6/10 of the cases that Pro provided in detail, but have come to a resounding conclusion that there is no evidence to suggest miracle-healing of theists by divine intervention... none at all. There may be better evidence that Pro omitted to include in this debate... but on the basis of Pro's examples, I urge gentle the voter to find that Pro has not done sufficient to carry the motion.Scientifically inexplicable, apparently supernatural things do occur, but they occur to theists and atheists alike. And we've really not seen any good examples here today. I'd be happy to have another debate, Pro willing, when Pro's had a chance to find some better example[s].