God's Existence

Con, do not give me the opportunity to make a fool of you again. You arrogantly assumed that I was referring to the Christian God. You also vaguely tried to point out that I was not specific (which could become my downfall). You have also ignored the possibility of Islamic god, Jehovah's Witness's god, Mormon god, Judaical god, Hindu god, and humanistic god. You then took it upon yourself to choose the topic of Christian God because of the case of the "G". Next you prepared a "hogwash" argument based on one of the over 31,000 verses of the Christian Bible. You then sloppily decided that: " Should this scripture verse be interpreted literally, men and women alike would look identical to God, yet there are people of infinitely different builds, skin tones, hair/eye color, and appearance. If God created both Adam and Eve in quick succession and told them to populate the earth, their children would all closely resemble their parent. " You yourself have proven yourself to be wrong in your own words. Allow me to show you how :) 1. You made this statement "Should this scripture verse be interpreted literally", at this point I could say that I did not mean it to be taken literally, then all words following are void. And your point becomes a fallacy. 2. Then you made the following claim: " men and women alike would look identical to God, ", by this, you are claiming to know what "God" looks like. And I would stop this debate to ask you, "what does God look like?". 3. Your next claim is a correlation to you first vague fallacy "yet there are people of infinitely different builds, skin tones, hair/eye color, and appearance."; here you are found to claim that people are not looking like God because of these differences. Well I ask, "How do you know?". Answer: you do not. I could continue to take the remainder of your "argument", if you will call it that, and pick it apart to expose the fallacies that lie within it. I would expose how you assume to know the speed of which mankind was created, how it must be law to resemble your parent, how after 1,000 years we would still resemble our parents (even though Michael Jackson was white to black parents), and how you believe that people being born to apes is a more supported argument (even though that would be a contradiction to you proposed law of parental similarity). Now then, With this being said, I urge you to present an argument that can stand up to logic instead of trying to prove your opponent to be a weak debater. Since you have failed to present a strong argument to support your clause, I will take the liberty of making the specifications as to "what" we are arguing about since you are confused between Morgan Freeman and Phillip Pullman. We are arguing about the God of the original Hebrew and Greek Bible. He is referred to as "I AM THAT I AM" (Jehovah), or Jesus Christ (Yahweh), or the Holy Ghost (Holy Spirit). Now then, because you have brought it up as an argument, how EXACTLY, in detail, did we evolve from apes? Please give extra concern to the development of our eyes, the process by which this occurred, the chemical structure that became us (and its origin), and what the initiation of all creation is/was. If you find trouble showing me this, (as many educated scientists have), feel free to give up, admit being wrong, and proceed to choose another angle. I assure you that my topic is strong, and my confidence in the "Liquidus" or "Evidence" for my clause will prove to be inevitably true. Now then. Con, I challenge you to answer the questions I have provided you in detail. If you fail to answer any one of these questions, you lose. Note: Next time choose your words with precision.