The Theory of Evolution Cannot Explain All Organisms.

Thank you Con! I will now make my Opening Statements/Arguments Briefly as to Initiate the Topic. Irreducible Complexity Irreducible Complex is a termed coined to describe a biological system consisting of several unique, interlocking parts all working in correlation to serve a greater function. Upon the removal of such parts, the system effectively ceases usefulness. There are several, typical structures used to support this idea. The Bacterial Flagellum The Flagellum, a structure found on many bacteria, is a common example of irreducible complexity. Evolution, which explains life through small, gradual steps, is based around the premise that small changes allow for the eventual culmination of beneficial genetic mutations to form an exponentially increasing variety of species. Gradual, minimal changes do not explain the flagellum. This subsystem cannot develop piece by piece. Remove a single part, and the system ceases to function. A useless system is a prime target for elimination by natural selection. The Evolutionist counter-measure is the hypothesis that the components of irreducibly complex systems performed various other functions before finally acting in correlation. The “previous functions” are not known or highly hypothetical. The more and more irreducibly complex systems we stumble upon, the more explanations for previous functions are required. Another Example of Irreducible Complexity are the ATP synthase molecule, a vital increment of life, without which no cell could survive. The Odds of Evolution Borel’s Law of Probability states that if an event has worse than a 1 in 10^50 power, than that event will NEVER happen. A biophysics professor, Dr. Harold Morowitz, hypothesized that the odds of even the simplest organism forming by chance is 1 in 10^340,000,000. Dr. Carl Sagan of Cornell University calculated that the odds were in fact 1 in 10^2,000,000,000. Picture a 1 with 2 billion zeroes and you get the basic picture. That’s far worse than the impossible 1 in 10^50. Just based on this, Evolution is a mathematical impossibility. But Lets take a look at the probability of the connections of the Human Brain forming by chance, shall we? An analogy: The odds of a 52 card deck forming a random coincidence of cards. 3 cards yields 6 different outcomes. The probability for a specific one? 1 in 6. For Four Cards the math is 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 = 24. 24 different ways four cards can be arranged. The odds? 1 in 24. By the 20th card, there are more combinations than seconds in 2 Billion years. And that’s just 20 cards. Consider the 1,000,000,000,000,000 connections in the human brain. Figure that number out. 1 Quintillion Cards? The numbers would far exceed the Myrillions. Closure of the Opening Statement: Irreducible complexity provides a logical method to discredit Evolution, while Standardized arithmetic provides a mathematical method to disprove Darwin’s theory. Evolution is both Mathematically, and therefore logically, impossible. And if not logically impossible by sheer odds alone, it is also do doubt logically impossible in and of itself. Even though the Odds of evolution are well below the statistical limit for a possible event, Evolution is taught as fact to millions of children. I will present more examples of Irreducible Complexity and Mathematical Impossibility in future rounds, as well as rebuttals to my opponent’s assertions. Sources: http://creationdesign.org... http://www.answersingenesis.org...