Evolution is a lie

Everything wrong about your point of view.The big bang theory and the theory of relativity are only mere speculation, but they are considered science by tons of scientists around the world! You can't see gravity, so you must not believe in it. Yet when you are ready to jump off of a building, some weird thought in your head will stop you from doing it, and this thought says, "I might get hurt when I jump off, if this gravity thing is legitmate." You cannot see air, so you must not believe in it, yet you are here breathing. You were not present when Babe Ruth was in his prime, does this mean he did not exist? No. All of this, happened, because we KNOW it did. All of this, ties directly into evolution.My argumentDo not use sources from wikiepedia, it makes things immensely easy for me. The Darwinism theory is true. His finches that he discovered on the Galapogos Islands play a major role in the validation of his theory. (1) Invalidates that "instant evolution" is not possible. In 1845, he stated that the initial species of finches came to the island because of wind, they competed with one another, creating different species that were adapted to survive and thrive, in unison with their counterparts that were taking up food. In (1), in less than one generation of finches, a new species was created, one that was able to adapt its beak to get the food it needed, which the bigger, newer birds were taking up. Going back to your statement that all of this is mere speculation, based upon the fact that theories have been proven wrong, another guy could speak up and prove.... gravity, or something of the sort wrong tomorrow. Does that mean that it is totally illegitmate and, not your twisted version of "science"? Well, judging by everything we know today, the startling answer is, nope! Evolution is something that has been added upon and added upon, not proved wrong. If the finches of Darwin's studies are able to adapt to someting changing in their environment so quickly, who is to say the earliest organisms did not adapt over a long period of time, experiencing new predators, environments, climates, and sources of food? When organisms change and develop, genetic mutations and adaptations carry on to offspring, leading to a better all around organism, and new species, even a new organism. What you said about, "an organism that shares no characteristics with its parent," is not possible. When you trace the line long enough back, you get to single celled organisms that were only able to survive in the environment present. Each generation had a changing evnrionment, and new ways of obtaining nutrients. Any organism that is alive today, was the fittest of the bunch. Many organisms have gone extinct long ago, but the current organisms have been the ones that were able to not only adapt, but SURVIVE. Also, another thing to point out, by saying evolution is not real, you are denying the fact that humans have not come from and share common traits with apes. The signs are written all over, and they clearly state that, humans are more advanced apes that have adapted to their environments differently. Not to mention the species of neanderthal that has gone extinct. We are clearly close cousins of them, and you deny that we are in the same evolutionary pool, that just because we have common characteristics, it is clearly not evolution? I think not. Thank you for giving me the chance to partake in this wondeful debate!Bacteria do not "want" their genes to stay the same. They have no minds and cannot process thoughts as effectively as we do every day.I also find it funny that you say, "evolution" is not intellectual, yet some of the greatest minds in science are working, as I speak, on unraveling the scroll of amazing history it contains.(1) http://news.nationalgeographic.com...