The User "Anonymouse" is a Troll

The question here should be what are bsh1's motives for accusing me of being a troll? Why is he singling me out? Does it have anything to do with my anti-establishment statements? If this is the case, what does an ordinary person, who isn't a shill, have to gain from sitting around the internet all day, waiting to target a dissident? Second question is, why is he only accusing me of being a troll, while ignoring the other pro-establishment trolls? What are his political motives? Let's look at the facts, bsh1 is online every single day. He specifically opposes those who are anti-establishment. If I were a thinker, I would be very suspicious of his employment. I mean let's be honest, if you were a capitalist, pro-imperialist, would you spend your entire day defending the status quo for free? I don't really care who anyone votes for, but I will say this. There are plenty of shills here voting for those who support the status quo, and voting against those who dissent. Winning does not really matter here. The important thing here is bringing up some important issues that everyone ought to know about, such as the use of shills by the U.S. government, and its allies to deceive the public and prevent dissent. If you have a curious mind, you might want to ask yourself if bsh1 is a shill. You might want to ask whether or not bsh1 has more than one account on this site. If bsh1 is so bothered by "trolls", then why is he trying to avoid the subject of talking about shills? He calls them rants, and is clearly uncomfortable about the discussion of shills. It seems like someone bothered by "trolls" would be equally bothered by shills. However, it does not appear to disturb bsh1 that shills operate on this site, and the rest of the internet. Something seems a little inconsitent about bsh1's modus operandi. If bsh1 is going to accuse others of being a "troll", then his background should also be scrutinised. If you are going to accuse others of being a troll, your background better be clean, otherwise, you are just a hypocrite. I'm not here to defend myself against your accusations. I am much more interested in calling to attention your credibility, as well as the credibility of your colleagues. Just like when the U.S. regime accuses others of being "terrorists", I am not so concerned about defending the "terrorists". However, I would like to take a closer look at the accuser, and its links to terrorists. In fact, that is why I have become so revolutionary, because when the U.S. regime talks about "human rights, democracy, and terrorism", it made me take a closer look at the U.S. regime's track record on all these subjects, and when I did, the U.S. regime did not look very good. I advise readers of this site to do the same thing. When someone is calling attention to trolling, take a look at the accuser. Put him under a magnifying glass, especially if this user is online day in and day out. What "normal" person has the time to do this? If in fact this wasn't his job. The truth of the matter is, the U.S. regime, and its allies does not like dissidents, and bsh1 keeps avoiding the subject of shills, and the measures that empire takes to silence the opposition. Why is that? Normal, curious people would want to know more about the subject. However, I can understand that if you were actually a shill, you would avoid the subject. I don't know about you, but I would be a lot more disturbed over shills being on the payroll of the U.S. govt at the tax payers expense, rather than a troll throwing insults on a forum. Even if I was insulting anyone, which I am not, I would be doing it on my own dime. However, this is not the case for all the shills operating throughout the internet (this site included). I find it hilarious that the U.S. government has shutdown all non-essential services, but shills are supposed to be essential. Think about it. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board; Department of Education; Department of Labor; Department of Transportation; National Council on Disability; Office of Government Ethics; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development closes, but shills keep on getting paid, up to $250/hr. Apparently deceiving the public trumps your safety, education, labour, transporation, disability, ethics, and housing needs. How does that sit with that average American citizen? I wonder. Something is seriously wrong with this country if its masters think that hiring online thugs to intimidate dissidents, and spread disinformation is more important than running a functional government. If bsh1 wasn't trying to silence me, why would he create a topic accusing me of being a shill? Do a search on this site, and see if anyone else has made a similar accusation? One of the ways that shills try to silence dissidents is by accusing them of being a "troll", and getting him kicked off the site. The accusation has less to do with "insults", and more to do with the political position of the accused. If I was "insulting" opponents of the U.S. regime, no one would ever accuse me of being a shill, but it is the fact that I have chosen to criticise the U.S. regime that has led bsh1 to oppose me. You see, unlike you, I believe in freedom, and real democracy. I never tell people how to vote.