BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The Kalam Cosmological Argument

For my response, I wish to note that Con has not actually made a rebuttal. Simply claiming "I will destroy you" and declaring "they don't support the claims in any way" is not a rebuttal. Con must give REASONS to demonstrate why their rebuttal dismantles the argument.. You cannot simply announce you are right - you must demonstrate why, that's what debating is. Since Con has given no reasons to support their two sentence rebuttal, I don't really have anything to respond to. Very disappointing. As such, I am forced to guess at the essence of Con's rebuttal since they did not articulate it. A small hint as to what Con meant can be found in the comments section of this debate: "It is like saying This donut has a cause. It began to exist. Therefore an asian, german speaking female created it." Here, Con has exposed their total failure to understand the argument. This analogy is not at all like the Kalam Argument, and I think the confusion lies in Con's understanding of the term "universe," so let's start there. By universe, we mean literally everything that exists. Cars, people, water, planets, time, physics, etc... Knowing this, we can know therefore that before the universe existed, there was nothing. Literally no thing. No space. No time. No material. We also know that nothing cannot produce something - out of nothing, nothing comes. And yet, here we are - our universe exists nonetheless. This is what makes the Kalam Argument so sound - it is the only way to explain how this can happen. We know the universe had a beginning (Con did not dispute this). We know that everything that begins has a cause (Con did not dispute this either). But yet, before the universe there was no space, no time, no material by definition. Therefore, it logically and necessarily follows that whatever caused the universe's beginning was spaceless, timeless, and immaterial. It also must have been uncaused, because it is metaphysically impossible to have in infinite series of past causes. The past cannot be infinite. For example - if an infinite series of events had to occur in the past in order to bring us to the present, we would never actually arrive at the present because an infinite series of events can never be completed. This is absurd. So, we can be confident that the ultimate cause of the universe was uncaused. Finally, this first cause was extremely powerful. This is self evident, since whatever it was managed to create space, time, and matter from beyond the realms of space, time, and matter. So, hopefully it is now clear that the conclusion does follow necessarily from the premises. If Con still finds this deduction as random as an Asian woman creating a donut, maybe this will help: P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause. P2: The universe (space, time, material, etc...) began to exist. C: Since the universe began (P2), it must have a cause (P1). Since things cannot create themselves, that cause must have been not space, not time, and not material. It was also uncaused, and unimaginably powerful. Con has not delivered an actual rebuttal yet, and until they do, my argument stands.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument

Full Premise:The Kalam Cosmological Argument is sound. "Sound" is defined as "a logically correct argument that withstands all scrutiny." Simply put - if Con can present evidence or argument that successfully dismantles the Kalam, Con wins. Format: Round 1 - Pro: Intro/present argument Con: 1st Rebuttal Round 2 - Pro: Response Con: Rebuttals Round 3 - Response/Rebuttals Round 4 - Pro: Final response Con: Only write "remarks complete." == Kalam Cosmological Argument == P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause. P2: The universe began to exist. C: Therefore, the universe has a cause which is necessarily spaceless, timeless, immaterial, uncaused, and unimaginably powerful. [1] [1] http://www.reasonablefaith.org...
GGDB Sneakers body

We don't always exactly what exactly to look for when purchasing a sports bra. Being comfortable and guarded is our number one goal, However this is not always an easy task reach when we can't really test the undergarment we are purchasing. Lucrative several things you should [b]https://www. Goldengoose-ggdb. Com/ [/b] consider when purchasing your sports bra, All of us will cover a handful of the essential points try replacing one for running or other athletic situations. Goldens in addition wish to gnaw. It's something that they get their own hunting raising. It is the key reason why they will wish to fetch and carry in order to you. It is not really a predicament, It simply signifies that there is some primary guidelines you should not break. For instance, Never give your adopted golden retriever a previous sneaker to munch by. The explanation is straightforward, He doesn't know enough time to create between the over 60's sneaker together with new athletic shoe. When an individual playing recreation of golf, Try put on attire is actually loose and fit. Will certainly allow that stay as comfortable as possible, Simply put swing is highly fluid and powerful. Wear cotton clothing that isn't too heavy for optimal results in regards to the course. People like pictures can easily one or more relevant visuals. Help Google function with out exactly what the photo is [b][url=https://www. Goldengoose-ggdb. Com/]GGDB[/url][/b] just about by handing it out a meaningful name (not the junk your camera or phone uses) and maybe a description. Strong arms are important for an impressive golf groove. Workout, Stretch, Relax, And massage when you're able to. A good massage will do your body more flexible, And assist improve your golf the game swing. Yoga can also help make your torso and arms limber, Allowing to buy smoother swing. The involving bacteria that reside on our feet really depends on whether or not we clean our feet properly. Whenever we wear shoes and socks throughout the day, Bacteria can grow and spread. Inside shoes and socks, The conditions [b][url=https://www. Goldengoose-ggdb. Com/]GGDB Sneakers[/url][/b] for bacteria and fungal growth basically right. Get Sears' lowest prices of the time of year on Friday and Saturday, August 16 and seventeen. Just in time for in order to school shopping, Sears provides the best prices of 4 seasons on Roebuck & Denver. Clothing for young men, Canyon River Blues separates for boys and girls and trendy junior styles from Bongo. Apart from [b][url=https://www. Goldengoose-ggdb. Com/]GGDB Shoes[/url][/b] these eating habits supplements like acai berry serve being an excellent diet pill. It is natural and contains no adverse effects. You may take it during the course of the exercises to add to the results.
Santa Claus is real

Not all houses have chimneys, so how would santa get in? There are roughly 7 billion people on the Earth, no one could make as many presents for them. The sleigh's payload adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium sized Lego set (2 pounds), the sleigh is carrying 321,300 tons, not counting Santa, who is invariably described as overweight. Santa has 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west. This works out to 822.6 visits per second. Thank you for this debate,pro! Vote con :) :) Cites: http://www.jimpoz.com...
Santa Claus is real

Every year NORAD tracks Santa. If Santa was ever shot down, whatever Country that committed it would be destroyed as millions of people got revenge. Santa is also posseses magic reindeer so getting from lace to place probably isn't an issue. As infinitecatlover said, if Santa wasn't real we wouldn't know who he is and where would we get presents from? I have proven the existence of Santa Claus. I thank con for participating.
Santa Claus is real

The bible is real, and santa is not I saw daddy kissing mommy in a santa suit Not all homes have chimneys, so how does he get in? Claus lives at the North Pole. In the middle of an ocean. He would have to travel several hundred miles to the nearest Scandinavian town to get supplies. Santa's handwriting differs with every home and child getting a gift. There is also no known treaties between Santa and other countries about airspace use. Every house may have human eating monster.. so, bye bye santa
Santa Claus is real

Argument from liberals Some republicans don't believe in Santa. Republicans are stupid therefore Santa Is real Argument from republicans Some liberals don't believe in Santa. Liberals are stupid. Therefor Santa is real. Argument from theists I St. Nicholas is Santa Claus. Therefor Santa Claus is real. II Jesus doesn't give kids presents. Santa does. Therefor Santa Claus is real Argument from Atheists I Nothing in the bible is true. Santa wasn't in the bible. Therefor Santa Claus is real. II Atheists tell their kids God isn't real, but they tell them Santa is real. Therefor they must have proof about his existence. III Atheists don't believe in god so they don't go to church. Why would they tell their kids Santa is real if they didn't believe in him. Argument from parents. My mommy is always right. If I say she isn't I get in trouble. Therefore Santa Claus is real. Argument from coolness The cool kids don't believe in Santa. Stereotypically cool kids are dumb, wrong, and use drugs. therefor Santa Claus is real. Argument from white supremacy White people get more presents then any other race. Santa is white. Santa is racist. In any movie ever have you ever seen him give a black guy a present? Therefor Santa Claus is real Argument from Hollywood. Hollywood movies are 100% accurate. I saw Santa in a movie. Therefor Santa Claus is real. Argument from my fist. See my fist? It hates people who don't believe in Santa Claus. therefor Santa Claus is real. Argument from Satanists. Satanists don't believe in Santa. There probably stupid. Therefor Satan is real. Argument from Industrial revolution. In the early 1800s kids started being bad. As a result they got a lot of coal but didn't know what to do with it. Then they realized you could burn coal and it jumpstarted the industrial revolution. Santa was baffled when more and more kids were allowed to be bad. Santa kept giving kids coal. Therefor Santa is real Argument from hippies. In the 60s Obmama wrote a book called Silent hills. Since Santa was taking all the coal to give to the bad kids, the hills weren't talking to Obmama because drugs had been outlawed and the animals that ate the coal didn't have any left to eat. Obmama made parents take better care of their kids and and made them act better. kids started getting more presents when they realized they were helping the environment. Now kids get lots of presents. Therefor Hippie Claus is real.
Santa Claus is real

Comment If you are interested! This is just a fun debate to get into the Christmas spirit! Arguments do not have to be logical they should be funny. While they don't need to be logical(you don't have to use sources unless you want to) they have to be related. In other words you can't say Santa isn't real because whales. The winner is decided by who came up with the most creative/humourous reasons. Good luck!
Thomas the tank engine is one of the best shows to be created

Cinema in the United States has been around for over one hundred years, originating with silent films all the way to four dimensional realistic films. Hollywood has been a large impact on all this development. Through history we have seen popular books come to life, emotional films that bring people to tears, and inspirational dramatic stories that change lives. I highly doubt a children's program with a train is better than that! Thomas the Train has little plot or excitement throughout the series. The only person I know who would watch it would have to be within 2 and 4 years old.
Thomas the tank engine is one of the best shows to be created

All right, thanks and let's begin. Thomas the tank engine started off as The Railway Series by the late Rev. W Awdry. After his books became a massive success, Britt Alcroft took the ideas and turned them into a television show. From then on, Thomas the tank engine has become one of the television shows to be created as years it has aired, it has not only taught children morals and values that are used in day-to-day lives but also gives interesting story telling rather then a basic three act structure (except for the Sharon Millar era but we won't go into that...*shudders*) Sagas and mini series have come out of this show such as Tugs or Jack and the Pack that teach people about lesser known be hikes around the world. I feel that Thomas the tank engine shows all of these things. Thanks for reading as this is my first debate ever! Your turn
Thomas the tank engine is one of the best shows to be created

And now to conclude. I believe that Thomas the tank engine is one of the BEST shows to be created. It takes a dedicated fan base and production team to build an empire of what this show has become. Compared to other shows, this fanbase and commitment, both in and out of its production history has lead to a whole generations of children and adults alike to be influenced and to be taught by something as simple as talking trains. Thanks
Thomas the tank engine is one of the best shows to be created

I never said it didn't have a fanbase. It does, but the fanbase is not as devoted as other series. I also never claimed it didn't atract adults. I said it doesn't attract MOST adults and that some are entertained by the series. I would also love to see some credible sources on the earnings of Thomas the Train and Game of Thrones. You say IMDB is not reliable, yet here is a quote from their official website. "In addition to using as many sources as we can, our data goes through consistency checks to ensure it's as accurate and reliable as possible" There are committed writers, producers, directors, voice actors, and helpers for every show. That isn't much of an argument. I want to point something out as well. You have broken the format for your own debate. Your last two arguments have had far more than three body paragraphs. I think whoever is voting for this should take that into consideration.
Thomas the tank engine is one of the best shows to be created

You say Thomas the tank Engine doesn't have a fan base? And that it doesn't attract adults? *Sighs* Right. Thomas the tank engine (the actuall show itsself) makes 1 billion dollars a year. Now compared to Game of Thrones, that isn't much but if you take into account the merchandise, the shirts and the other accessories that are sold...Thomas the tank engine makes a total of 70 billion dollars per season when added all together. And with it approaching its 20th 14000 billion dollars have been made approx. The railway community of Thomas the Tank engine is just as strong as those for other television shows with clubs and railway models. Here are some just to name a few of the YouTube ones who are adults: The Unlucky Tug ThomasWoodenRailway MilkTankerMedia Enterprising Engines93 Ramafool Of course it's all matter of opinion of which show is good but IDMb is not a reliable source as even as much as they say they have some, no critics are actually on that website that are 100% reliable so that argument for best shows is irrelevant. Also, if adults didn't like this show, how come there are committed writers, producers, directors, voice actors and helpers who also contribute with their heart and soul into this show? Also this show has the likes of Alec Baldwin, George Carlin and Ringo Star involved so it touches the hearts of our heroes and icons as well. Thomas the tank engine is one of the most influential characters ever created and is a well known symbol of childhood and nostalgia. Adults and kids alike are still watching this show to this day as it strikes such string in their hearts that they feel good when watching it. Now side note, there are two ways we can finish. A. You rebut this but make no more reasons or B. You get to make new arguements in round three but I get to rebut in the conclusion. This is what happens in real debates when you are on the Con side.
Thomas the tank engine is one of the best shows to be created

Alright then, shows. Thomas the Train has an IMDB rating of 6.8. This link (http://www.imdb.com...) gives a list to 25 shows with higher ratings. There are also way more than that but didn't make the list. Thomas the Train is a children's show. It doesn't attract most adults. While many adults are entertained by the series, it just fails to attract them. Cartoon trains aren't exactly a show an adult would watch. Thomas the Train compared to other shows isn't very good. When we look at shows such as Game of Thrones, Sherlock, and Supernatural, they all have huge fandoms who are obsessed over the show. While Thomas the Train does have a fanbase, most of them are either in elementary school or simply not obsessed like these fandoms are (buying shirts, figures, other merchandise, clubs, etc).
Thomas the tank engine is one of the best shows to be created

You say that Thomas the tank engine has little plot...I would highly disagree. And that it isn't dramatic enough is absolute rubbish. Over its many years on television, TTTE has become a worldwide phenomenon, touching many people's nostalgia and childhood, not only for a novelty but also has an educational device. Let's take Gordon and the Flying Scotmans relationship. In the many incarnations of these two characters, two main bonds stand true to who they are. One being the strong, undivided bond of brotherhood, a connection to last an eternity and the other being the jealously Gordon faces towards The Flying Scotman for being better and more famous than him. In the first story, this teaches kids AND ADULTS how to act around fellow company and how to mantain a strong friendship and the second showing how to deal with envy and jealousy and how to come out of top. People learn how to compromise and how to have fun with the antics of Bill and Ben, people learn about diversity and other nationalities with Donald and Douglas and Hiro and people learn how to overcome fears with the hijinx of Rusty and the Narrow Gauge Engines. You also mention how films and cinema can bring people to tears...while I agree with you on that, the topic of discussion is about a television show, not a film. And compared to other children's programs, this certainly comes out on top. Bob the Builder: Tells kids that as long as you say sorry at the end, you can do anything you want. Dora the explorer: Patronises kids when it teaches numbers and teaches you to say numbers and hello is Spanish. Postman Pat: While a charming show, didn't go very far in run time. Brum: I used to love this show but as I get older, the stories become a bit to boring and repetitive. And that's another thing, even as an adult, no of these shows compare to the sheer greatness that is the story telling that can entertain both adults and children, something other kids shows have a hard time doing.
Christmas starts too early

Thank you for accepting my argument. I do believe that christmas starts too early because why start advertising christmas while people are out buying their halloween candy. Then, the day after halloween there is so many christmas ads that people will get tired of Christmas before Thanksgiving even rolls around. I believe that you shouldn't start advertising Christmas until late November or early December. I believe Christmas shouldn't be celebrated so early because people should be celebrating the other holidays like Halloween and Thanksgiving. Right after thanksgiving people go crazy for the best deals just for Christmas. It gets kind of crazy. I turn the debate over to you :)
Abortion

I'm very sorry to my opponent, but I won't be able to debate this next round; as usual I'm painfully short on time and just am not able to set apart enough all at once to do justice to this debate any further. I thank my opponent for their engaging, and well written arguments; and I hope to have "re-do" in a few months when my time isn't stretched so thin. I ask that my opponent accept this as an agreement to have the round judged on prior made arguments, and not to count this as a forfeit. Again, thanks for the wonderful debate!
Abortion

Hey look at that! I'm wanting to debate one of those awful topics that has been debated so often people have simply, and utterly lost interest. Only here's the twist, I am legitimately wanting to debate this topic. I won't place too many restrictions on this round, just that the first round is off the flow for the round. Anything said in the acceptance round will be taken into consideration for a general understanding of the round, but not as a voting issue. Actual debate starts in the next round. I'm open to any style, and any manner of arguments; seriously do whatever you wish. I will personally be rather casual in this debate; you can expect me to be fairly straight-forward. I'll more likely than not only have time to debate in the spare seconds between my life, so my arguments won't be too profound. Over-all I hope for a fun, and light hearted round. While I understand that this topic is a big one, I also understand that it can be debated without spreading the irrelevant minutia of the subject too thinly. That said I expect to have a simple, yet relevant round. That said, I'll open the floor to whomever accepts this debate; Here's to a great round!
I am the sexiest lesbian on Debate.org.

According to Anthony Flew's Falsification Principle, statements (moral or otherwise) are true until they can be proven false. It is irrelevant for someone to tell me "you are not the sexiest lesbian on debate.org" if they do not possess empirical evidence to support their claim. This is a system adopted in large amount by the US legal system - the idea that a client is "innocent until proven guilty". In other words: their arguments regarding their innocence are considered true under the United States Law unless an accuser can prove that client to be lying about their statements, i.e. guilty. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that, under the influence of Flew's falsification principle, I am most certainly the sexiest lesbian on debate.org unless you have solid, empirically proof to counter it. We can also imply from this that under the United States Judiciary system I am innocent of my claim until proven guilty of lying. Hence, I am outright considered as the sexiest lesbian on debate.org under the US state. I rest my case.
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should colonize Mars.

I am going to apologize here. I am going to New Mexico and will be unable to debate. I still wish to debate and so I ask to start this debate in about 14 days. Again, I am sorry for the inconvenience and if you do not wish to then I fully understand. As for the voting, I ask that you wait if we are going to debate at a later date but if not then I ask that you give this to Con. This situation is my fault and so I take responsibility for it but I leave this up to Con. Thank you for understanding and I hope to see you again in 14 days:)
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should colonize Mars.

I am unable to find a debate that suits my fancy and so I have made this. It is impossible to accept so just put in the comments a suggestion and I will respond asap. No matter the topic, though, the structure will stay the same: 1. Acceptance. 2. Main body. 3. Rebuttal and Conclusion. Alright, I have chosen! I will be pro for the colonization of Mars.