Scientific Problems with the Big Bang

Well then, that's quite a bit. :Missing Monopoles The issue here is that your using a "then can, so they must" argument, what I mean by that is you think that because they can exist and would be stable, they thereby must exist, this is simply not true. A great example of this is the foundation of all life on earth "DNA/RNA" you see the thing is, dna and rna are not the only possible nucleic acids that could have formed on the prebiotic earth, there are a mulitude of other prebioticly possible and STABLE nucleic acid and nucleic acid hybrids, so by your logic they should all exist because nothing is stopping them from forming and they are stable, but did they? NOPE, this is because the situation is more complicated then that, the universe isnt black and white on these type of things. So no, a lack of monopoles proves nothing, and even if it did, and you were able to prove the universe was never hot, that wouldent automaticly prove an intelligent designer, let alone the god of the bible, sorry. - The Flatness Problem "The expansion rate of the universe appears to be very finely balanced with the force of gravity" Im going to have to correct you on your point here, the universes rate of expansion is NOWERE NEAR FINELY BALANCED, we know through observation and study that the universes expansion is speeing up with no sign of slowing down, so your wrong in that reguard. You also seem to have a missconseption on what they mean by and open and closed universe, they are refering to the geomerty of space time itself, also you claim that cosmology cannot account for this, again you are simply mistaken, its possible that the universe can be flat and infinite, its also possible that the universe is a closed 4D sphere, and we just havent been able to messure it because its so big that messuring its curvature is simply not withen our relm of capliabillity, also the infinite values you talk about only apply to our equations, the universe itself is not these equations, we use these equations to better understand how reallity works. And this universe is by no means fine tuned for life, if that were the case we would be able to find life to be very common throughout the expanse of the universe, instead what we find is a vast cosmic ocean full of radiation and constant forces of destruction, were life is pretty rare at best, heck we havent found any other life yet o_o, most planets are completely inhospitable and incapliable of creating replicons and other possible life predisesors, so no sir the universe couldent be farther then fine tuned for life, i give you the water in the puddle example, the water finds that it fits in this iregular shaped puddle and says "wow! this puddle is just the right shape for me!" when in reallity it is the water "aka life" that molds to fit the puddle, the point is, when ever life does manage to get a foot hold, it evoloves and adapts to its given envioronment and surroundings, you stating the universe is fine tuned for life is simply ignorant. - Inflating the Complexities why would the universe need to stop expanding? for what we can observe its speeding up, and its most likley that the universe constantly goes through varrying rates of expansion, and inflation is very true, because we can demonstrate that it happens, unlike you with biblical claims and empty speculation. - Where Is the Antimatter? You are correct in the reguard of matter and antimatter being made in equal amounts, however like i have mentioned before the univese isnt perfect or black and white, it would have taken one atom out of slightly out of place to put one in the favor of another. Your statement about god creating the universe with matter is simply false, if this were true in any reguard, you expect that antimatter would only be able to be created via artifical methods, however this is inconsitant with what we see in reallity, we see that anti matter does indeed exist in some quanity out in the universe, so much so that we have been able to record an entire light spectrum from it, which is conseqently the same as ours, this is not constiant with your biblical claim by any strech, but rather more empty speculation and a god of the gaps arugment to top it off https://www.nasa.gov... - Missing Population III Stars Again, most of these stars were incredibly massive and died off LONG AGO, a pure hydrogen star of 200 solar masses only has a life time of around only 17,600 which is INSANELY SHORT, however it would be reasonable to assume that some smaller mass population III stars would be around right? well the issue is, you want a PURE HYDROGEN STAR, not even trace elements, nada, and the problem with that something called cosmic contamination, if an asterioid or such were to fall into this star, it would hold trace amounts of said element and you would deem it not a population III star, what your basicly asking for, is for us to add a drop of freshwater into the ocean, find said water drop without a SINGLE SALT ATOM IN IT, that is the problem with finding stars like these, and we may have evidence that such stars still could be around. http://www.sciencemag.org... http://www.eso.org... _ Darkmatter and etc You state that dark matter and comisc inflation have not been observed, we have observed comic inflation, and we have observed the effects of dark matter, we dont need to directly observe dark matter in order to messure its effects and know of its existance, in the same way we cant directly observe electrons and tempature, or neurlogical activity, but we know it exists, and we can messure its effects. - I Highly suggest you did a bit more research on this before posting your rebuttle, because its quite obvious you have some misconseptions in reguard to this topic also even if we cant explain something, that doesnt mean your god did it.