Covenys recent behavior would be a net detriment on ForDebating.Com (his new website)

The topic is “Covenys .. behavior … DETRIMENT …ForDebating.Com” For Pro to win this debate he needs you to focus on 10% and ignore everything else but what FD has to lose. The deeper effects of controversy are integral to the topic. Nothing I have presented is outside the scope of this topic but Pro needs you to focus on the 10% of the debate that he wins at and ignore the millions of dollars this successful technique has generated. #1 If you have nothing to lose then how can any action be a detriment? This is an irrefutable fact, and Pro has ignored it. #2 Pro has implied that the other people I was speaking to were innocent victims just talking and I went off on them. This is a complete misrepresentation. Everyone one who I have had conflict with started in on me first. This shows how Pro holds me to a different standard than everyone else. The authority of this site lists Tuf as the president, a figurehead of DDO, and Tuf is going to be a Mod on FD. Pro doesn’t see Tuf’s actions of starting this (and continuing after the game was over) in a negative light and even says “Tufs behavior … with Coveny is a non-factor in this debate.”. Proving that he doesn’t hold Tuf (figurehead) to this imaginary standard that he says “everyone” follows but me. #3 To show you how absurd Pro is, he says that the President of the United States needs to act the same way as a store manager? The President... and a store manager should act the same. And he wants to call me a “blithering moron” with this as the foundation to his argument? Seriously? Pro either won’t admit or doesn’t understand that Trump’s controversial tactics were effective garnering him the presidency by making fun of handicap reporters, degrading women, and vilifying Mexicans and Muslims. Alex Jones is making over 10 million a year as the “figurehead” of his brand. From the article above you can see that his defense in court is that he’s just performing to make money… because it works. These are just TWO of many pertinent references that I have listed ... and linked supporting material to. This is NOT my opinion, these are multiple sources about how advertising works. Pro has not linked or discussed advertising at all, because he’s so focused on that 10% that he wants you to focus on as well. Rather than addressing how bad press sells more books, gets more rentals, or even gets pro off his A$$, pro’s whole argument is that I’m not advertising the way he thinks I should. Howard Stern did get fired like Pro portrays as “store managers”, and now instead of the owners of that company making a portion of the millions a year Stern makes, they have their fantasy about how advertising should work, rather money. Pro may not like my tactics, but he has done NOTHING to prove they aren’t effective. I’ve shown you that advertising the way he wants me to advertise doesn’t work. 7k and 6 likes? That’s about 0.1% engagement and that’s the type of advertising he expects me to do? Pro falsely portrays that he speaks for many others. I can’t address the ones he doesn’t list names but I can prove he’s lying about Tuf. Tuf has agreed to be a moderator on FD, this has not changed, and I have since asked Tuf’s opinion about a game I am creating for the forums on FD, and here is his response: https://imgur.com... So, don’t believe what Pro is saying about “many others” not having FD in their minds, and don’t believe that controversy doesn’t work because it offends Pro. Offended people make brands rich, look at chick-fil-a In closing. I did not want to go this route, I would have loved months ago to have a warm welcome and be told that what I was creating was really needed because a fully functional debate website that is always available is something everyone wanted. I would have loved to discuss what they wanted to see in a debate website, but instead I got ignored. Now Pro wants to cry because I changed from ineffective tactics to effective ones? If he wanted polite, he should have responded to polite.