Resolved: Legalized Abortion is the Greatest Crime against Humanity in the History of Mankind

I have made this debate nearly impossible to accept. If you are interested, please explain why you would like to accept this challenge in the comments section. Resolved: Legalized Elective Abortion [A] is the Greatest Crime against Humanity in the History of MankindThe "ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT" defines 'crimes against humanity' as; 1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:(a) Murder; (b) Extermination; (c) Enslavement; (d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population; (e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law; (f) Torture; (g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity; (h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; (i) Enforced disappearance of persons; (j) The crime of apartheid; (k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.The Rome Statute Explanatory Memorandum states that crimes against humanity are particularly odious offenses in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. However, murder, extermination, torture, rape, political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of meriting the stigma attaching to the category of crimes under discussion. On the other hand, an individual may be guilty of crimes against humanity even if he perpetrates one or two of the offences mentioned above, or engages in one such offense against only a few civilians, provided those offenses are part of a consistent pattern of misbehavior by a number of persons linked to that offender (for example, because they engage in armed action on the same side or because they are parties to a common plan or for any similar reason.) Consequently when one or more individuals are not accused of planning or carrying out a policy of inhumanity, but simply of perpetrating specific atrocities or vicious acts, in order to determine whether the necessary threshold is met one should use the following test: one ought to look at these atrocities or acts in their context and verify whether they may be regarded as part of an overall policy or a consistent pattern of an inhumanity, or whether they instead constitute isolated or sporadic acts of cruelty and wickedness."In this debate, I (Chuz Life) will take the affirmative position of "Pro" and argue that Legalized Abortion on Demand has been (for about 40 Years now) the greatest 'Crime Against Humanity' [1] in the history of mankind. Con will of course argue to the contrary so the burden of proof is disproportionately on Pro. Con will be expected to argue that other crimes against humanity are greater than abortion and (or) that legalized abortion on demand is no crime against humanity at all. Rules:1. The first round is for acceptance2. Please. No Forfeits3. No new arguments in the final round Debate Structure: Round 1: Acceptance and opening remarksRound 2: Presenting arguments Round 3 & 4: Refutation of opponent's arguments Round 5: Defending your original arguments and conclusion (no new arguments)Definitions:[A] Elective Abortion: elective abortion is an induced abortion done at the request of the mother for other than therapeutic reasons [2].[B] For the purposes of this debate, a "Crime Against Humanity" is defined as quoted (above) from the "ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT" [1]Sources: [1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...