The Christian God does not exist.

A hearty thanks to Pro for instigating this debate and intriguing arguments.Pro's ArgumentsHere Pro has chosen to abandon his original arguments for one's arguing that God is contradictory. His arguments consolidated are as follows:The Argument from Imperfection A perfect God can not create imperfection. The universe is imperfect. Therefore, God does not exist. The Argument from Emotion* A perfect God would not show petty human traits. The Christian God is self-admittedly vengeful, jealous, and full of wrath. Being vengeful, jealous, and full of wrath are petty human traits. Therefore the Christian God does not exist. *I made that title up. I'm not sure if it's a legitimate philosophical title for this particular argument. Rebuttal to The Argument from ImperfectionThe first problem with this argument is the subjective nature of "perfection". Since Pro has not chosen to define "perfect" I shall do it for him. The Merriam Webster dictionary defines perfect to mean:"a : being entirely without fault or defect : flawlessb : satisfying all requirements : accuratec : corresponding to an ideal standard or abstract concept"-[1]I think that combining (a) and (c) gives us the most relevant and accurate definition of "perfect". What we must take note of is how (c) relates to (a). If to be perfect, you must be entirely without flaw or defect relative to an abstract concept, then in essence to be perfect you must meet all the requirements someone creates for you.This is where the subjectivity of perfection comes in. Essentially, to be the perfect a being must meet all the requirement standards of its concept. For example, if Jake's ideal car is a car that is silver and can drive 65 mph, then if he builds a car that is silver and can drive 65 mph, he has built a perfect car. However, if Jimmy's ideal car is a car that is black, can drive 10,928,347 mph and can turn into both a plane and a submarine, then Jake's car is far from perfect relative to Jimmy's concept of what an ideal car is.Now, Jake was the creator of his concept of the car, therefore the car he created is perfect according to his concept of what a car is. However, according to Jimmy's concept of what a car is, Jake's car is imperfect.To satisfy this dillemma, we must either A) Judge a being's perfection based purely on whether it meets all all of the requirements set up by the original concept (the original concept being that of the creator) or B) Abandon the concept of perfection altogether.The Universe is Perfect, And ImperfectIgnoring the fact that Pro assumes God created the universe exactly the way we see it today, Pro is claiming that the universe is imperfect based on his concept of what an ideal universe should look like. So in reality, Pro is arguing this: My concept of what an ideal god would do is to not create things I consider to be imperfect. The universe is not what I consider to be an ideal universe. Therefore the universe is imperfect. Thus my concept of an ideal god does not exist. Here what Pro has done, is prove that his concept of an ideal god does not exist. He has not, however, proven that the Christian God does not exist. To do this, he must prove that the universe somehow does not meet all the conditions according to the Christian God's concept of what the universe should look like.Thus, according to Bible, Pro must prove that the universe was created in a manner contrary to the Christian God's concept of an ideal universe. Unfortunately, Pro has not done this, and he will not (in this debate) get the chance to do so. Thus his first argument fails.Rebuttal to The Argument from EmotionFirst of all, Pro has given no sources claiming that God is vengeful, jealous, and full of wrath. Thus right off of the bat this argument hold no ground. Since it rests on a purely groundless assertion.However, even then, Pro is arguing that the Christian God does not exist because the Christian God does not meet Pro's concept of what an ideal God would look like. He is essentially saying that a God that exhibits emotions that I don't consider to be Godlike proves that God does not exist. Rather then do this, Pro must prove that God being vengeful, jealous, and full of wrath in any case or scenario is contradictory to the Christian concept of God's nature. Not just his arbitrary requirements for God.Essentially, he must prove that it is against God's nature to be just, since justice and vengence are essentially the same thing. He must also prove that it is against God's nature to care, since the jewish word for jealousy is "qin-ah", which in reference to God means "religious zeal of God for his people" [2]. In addition, Pro must prove that it is against God's nature to care enough to get extremely angry, since wrath essentially means "extreme anger".Unfortunately, as this is the last round, Con will not be getting the chance to do that.ConclusionPro has proven that his subjective concept of God does not exist. He has not, however, proven that the Christian God does not exist. Thus he has not fulfilled his burden of proof.I thank the audience for reading, and I hope you enjoyed this.I ask that you reward one of us at least one point purely on whose profile picture you like. I just want to say that ninjas are freaking cool, and I think you should give Pro a point for having a ninja profile picture. Ninjas have shooting stars, know martial arts, and have the sickest one liners ever. I don't even have to give you a source for that claim either, because we all know in our hearts that ninjas are mega super ultra legit. But still, for your entertainment. See the video above. http://www.youtube.com...So basically please give Pro one point for being a ninja and thus, a boss.But then, you know, give me arguments and stuff so I can win and have my win percentile up so then I can one day join the leaderboard so I can finally have some self-confidence.If you're still reading this, you should know by now that my argument is over, and I'm basically just killing 2,000 something characters I have left.I got asked to Prom! By my really good friend. She was laughing when at first (I thought she was trolling me or being silly but she was probably just nervous) when she told. So at first I was sort of unsure, I mean, she lives super far away and I wasn't sure if she was trolling me. So I said I didn't think so because she's so far. After that she said "it's fine, I gotta go, goodbye" and hung up. But I could tell she was crying (she was kinda choked up as she said goodbye) so I called her back up and said I'd go with her and I asked her all the details and stuff and she was really happy (you know, sending thank you's and hearts and all that). Well, that was yesterday. BUT NOW SHE'S TEXTING ME ONE WORD MESSAGES. Seriously. Now I'm confused. Did I offend her by saying I'd go to Prom with her? Is it bad to say you'll go to Prom with a girl after you said you didn't think you could? Maybe I didn't sound sincere enough?Don't hate. She follows my personal blog. So, you know. You guys are my only outlet. :PPlease help. And vote for me.Sources:[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...[2] http://www.blueletterbible.org...