Aviators is NOT a Bad Artist!

*Smoke puffs out from the ground; I appear and look around with disappointment* You anxious, buddy? You should be... *Heavy sigh* Oi, Oi, Oi, Oi Oi. Seems like SOMEONE'S missing a very important key factor that was supposed to be considered from the very start! I never thought about this factor, and if I did, I would probably leave it out in hopes that it wouldn't be needed. But here we are now, and it looks like it should be brought up: what really matters is what the ARTIST wants to do with his career and make out of it. Their personal opinion on how good they are. And if Aviators thinks he is good at what he does, then that's probably the reason why he just sticks to the technique and main genres that he does. What if he doesn't WANT a record deal? What if the only live performances he wants to do are the small ones at the local Brony conventions? What if he's currently happy with the income he makes each year? The reason that his music isn't quite different from one another could very well be that he's comfortable with the position he's in right now. He has once made a song that has a unique style from usual: But of course that was part of his 2012 experimental EP to try and push himself a little bit to see what he can do, and the reason that he hasn't made that style is probably because he's more comfortable with his usual style. That's fine. I don't see anything bad in that, his talent is probably just in pretty much everything he makes. You want to hear more stuff he does? Knock yourself out... https://soundcloud.com... Oh, and BTW, 4:4 phrase never gets old, in fact, that's the lifeblood of most music. And his style has a TON of different tempos, most unique intros, and for some people, it may seem boring, but if that's what he wants to do, what he's comfortable with doing, there's nothing bad or wrong with that. Why does he not seek a record or a larger fund, you ask? Well, I didn't think I would have to bring this up, but it seems you've left me no choice: he's engaged. He's dealing with that at the same time as his music career. He's chosen THAT instead of high success, and there's nothing wrong with just being a homie musician with a family and all, if that's all he wants to do with his talent. (*JUST LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!!!!!* I was screaming in my mind for like the whole day) Now let ME clear up some of my what-seemed obvious points. He's been playing the violin singe age 4, and did that for 8 years until he decided to quit, because he thought the violin would get him nowhere, when it actually taught him a lot about music theory, reading it, blah blah blah like that. So he started on the guitar shortly after that, and continued experimenting with what he knew until 2011, when he began recording music the simple starter way (GarageBand DAW) but never released his works because he thought that early work to be "absolutely horrible" (however, in my opinion, those early pieces are absolutely AWESOME, if they are what I think they were) and then moved on to something more pro (Fruity Loops) and threw together what came out as Reflections of a Dream. Now, just because I haven't listened to it doesn't give me no hint that it MIGHT just actually be good, based on the majority of reviews: https://itunes.apple.com... Now, I may be 14, but ever since I was 4, I've always had this special autistic connection with music, and have had a TON of experience with it over the years. I never got to practice instruments that much, and the only thing I always had time for was my voice. And boy, does Aviators have a VOICE. I don't need too much sourcing to insure my confidence of victory, mostly because I'm not sure I have everything I could get, but it's enough, I just know it. And revenge, baby, just feels good no matter who it's on (although on my previous AvITBA opponents, it should taste a lot sweeter...) And how is he able to produce music so quickly, you ask? Well, why is Willy Wonka a candyman? Why am I an autistic Brony with hopes and dreams of livin' in Equestria? Exactly, because he was BORN to be a musician (part-to-most of the time, of corse -- he's currently engaged) and once again, if he doesn't want a record label, if he's happy with the pace he's going at right now, then that's okay, nothing bad there in ANY way. (Oh yeah, I'm gonna win this thing) Definitely your first point. And the only reason I haven't listened to EVERY single buggin' piece he's ever made and am taking my info somehwat blindly is because these things take TIME! Okay? And I didn't have poor planning on this debate, either -- I had SPECIFICALLY sworn to start this debate as soon as Ghosts In The Code came out, and all my info and debating experience are right here at my will, and I will stop at nothing to win this. Oh yeah, BTW, I said "FICTIONAL video game" music, thank you very much. There's no actual video game involved with this. Yet. I heard he's making the soundtrack for the upcoming indie game "Nikra" by request and commission. Interesting...? And you were already under the impression that most of his music was emotional BEFORE you heard Acoustic? Not every single piece is like that, but it in FACT does not apply only to Acoustic. Only stuff like these and maybe a little more if I'm not mistaken... AND not only does he do a range of genres, but a range of messages too. Now just because not all of them may be good, does that make him a bad artist? Let me think...uuh, yeah, NO. And the technique thing was just a rough estimate of what he usually does. It's not a sticking thing, he's not being manipulative at all, and he would definitely NEVER do the inverse of that! And even if he did, I think I would still like that melancholy exit piece, because no matter what he pumps out, nothing's bad at all. And popularity-wise? Yeah, you're definitely crossin' the line, buddy. Popularity doesn't seem like an issue to Avi, because it's probable to him, 50,000+ is enough...for now. Just as long as he HAS positive popularity, he has no issue, and there's nothing bad about that. And that last part there? Well, it was late and I was losin' my mind like I ALWAYS do when it's late at night. Even though it is late right now, my mind is clearer, and I will clear up my victory wrap-up for ya'll. He's not bad, it's merely in his opinion that he could use some work, but other than that, in the opinions of the fans, not bad, and in my ears, absolutely GOOD. Of course he deserves a chance at hitting the big shots, but have you forgotten what the general/gossipy public makes out of those famous people? Yeah -- I may not be a genius, but I THINK that may be the reason he hasn't gone there yet. It's not a concession, just blurred lines. But now those lines are somewhat clear to me and I've found the ghosts in the code of THIS argument, and it would only seem like they say I'm gonna win. So voters, if you can, PLEASE no matter what use your citizenship rights to vote on this thing. And vote for Pro, the positive side, the side that sees NOTHING bad in the curly-haired, 20-to-30-something, awesomely talented almost-mythingal being/existence that is Tyler "Aviators" Shaw (Not that Bad!) And I'll look at YOUR code and find the ghosts.................LATER..........(*Backs away into the smoke, more evil chuckling*) (AND if you wanna check out more of what Avi has done over the years...I dare you to do it.) https://www.youtube.com...