Is the metaverse simulation theory valid

1) I don't particularly want to dwell on the word "flaw". I was simply saying that I did not consider Pro's argument to be flawed. I was suggesting that all debating evidence is valid, Even if there is no certainty of that evidence's correctness. 2) Quite simply there is no real evidence to prove the existence of a superior species, Either universally or as an earthbound predecessor. Surely a superior intelligence that has the capability to project a complex simulation on a universal scale also has the ability and the confidence to make it presence known without doubt. In just the same fashion as god theories, There always has to be a shroud of mystery and secrecy involved. Why? Whether or not we had predecessors that exhibited greater levels of intelligence is a much wider debate and a claim that is impossible to prove conclusively. 3) As Pro's argument clearly shows, Simulation theory is entirely assumptive and lacks any tangible evidence. Simulation theory assumes the existence of a superior intelligence that possesses the ability to project a simulated image of a separate universe, But a universe that is obviously inferior to their own. What would be the purpose of this charade? Pro then goes on to debunk the big bang theory, By citing the something from nothing principle, But as I have already stated the something from nothing principle must apply to all creation theories. A superior intelligence possessing highly advanced simulating technology cannot just magically exist, It too must undergo a sequence of material creation and subsequent material development. 4) Quite frankly, Pro's "reasoning" is confusing, Moralistic, Pseudo religious rambling and offers no real insight into or justification for a simulated universe. I would reason that, Projecting a simulated universe is a fantastic notion but not wholly irrefutable, What I would refute however is the notion that it would be possible to project and maintain a simulated universe, In which matter exhibited structural formation, Sentience and sensory perception. 5) Mathematics as far as we know is a human construct. A development of human intellect. Something that we apply, To facilitate our appreciation of our universe. Suggesting that human mathematics ( without prerequisite information) can justify the existence of an alternate, Superior intelligence is quite simply a massive, Illogical leap of faith to far. Pro also infers (without justification) probability and current possibility. I would suggest that based on current knowledge and understanding rather than on pure assumption, A simulated universe is highly improbable. As for current possibility and with no examples of current possibility offered, It is impossible to know what Pro is suggesting. Conclusion: Simulation theory is just another theory that relies on the magical existence of a secretive, Superior intelligence and as ever, Completely fails to take into account or simply ignores the precursor of that superior intelligence. I would propose that it is far more likely that the matter and the universe that we are a part of is unique. We accept that this universe actually exists because we are able to perceive it and we must accept for now that the creation of matter and any possible preceding time and events cannot be understood. Simulation theory is merely an ethereal projection of the human imagination and therefore should not be regarded as a valid scientific hypothesis.