Young people do not have good arguments.

I did ask for cogent arguments, and thus far you are disappointing. Although, I'll to the effort to point out your mistakes there in. I contend that, as a 1996 study found, the ability to understand and perceive incompetence are exactly the skills lacking in the incompetent. I thusly gauge that your ability to declare people clueless may be impaired if you are yourself clueless. To accuse people, myself included, of voting against you on the grounds that they are kids not voting on logic is not a cogent argument. I submit that your arguments typically descend into rants about Muslims, the ACLU, Liberals and Communists. I contend that the voters, whoever they may be, do not view these as cogent arguments on topics ranging from hydrogen economies to the importance of the Bible. I contend that you have been shooting yourself in the foot rather than suffering from a grand conspiracy of teenagers out to get you. You argue that conservatives have tougher skins due to being older and wiser. I submit that many old conservatives go into hissy fits when told "happy holidays". I contend that this is not thick skin but rather the product of living in a culture where offensive material to older, white, Christian, conservatives has been largely removed from the public square. You stake your claim on two points, which quite honestly are four points: Science, engineering, history, and politics. I contend that youth in these topics is generally an advantage. For example, studies have found that that the peak years for discovery are between 18-25, after which most people become less productive. For example, Albert Einstein published three papers, proving atomism, laying the groundwork for quantum mechanics, and general relativity all in his early twenties. As he aged he never managed any breakthroughs of equal note. You have had debate on science topics. I have read these debates and found them wanting. First off, hydrogen is not a very effective alternative fuel for gasoline, you lost the debate that it was... two somebody in his forties with bad arguments himself. You were crushed on the topic of collidal silver because it's unscientific hogwash. It will perhaps turn you blue but it has never been shown to cure anything. You were demolished by a 19 year old whose argument was not only correct by scientifically justified showing an understanding of not only viral anatomy and and the immune system but the working of the FDA when it comes to nonsense. However, we should be very careful here and note that the very essence of the argument is that young people are inherently inferior. A few people who schooled you in a debate and you claim to have won and that they were idiots, does not count as evidence of this universal claim. Just as having a white cat would not justify my claim that all cats are white. Al Gore does not say the sky is falling, he says that global warming is real and the science is very much on his side. You have had a number of rants about Islam being a threat. This may be the case, however your case is poorly made on the subject. And you have thusly lost every issue. Nothing you have said here has any bearing on that. Young people are not fed anti-conservative propaganda they usually make decisions for themselves and understanding the issues and the morality at play choose to go against the conservative propaganda which typically tends towards incoherent rants. Liberalism is has a good amount of logic behind a good number of ideas. And though people have feelings towards their positions that is not to be confused with people basing their position on feelings. Further, I contend, a good deal of conservative policies are fueled by hate and fear; last I checked those were emotions. You have made a number of points about your previous debates (typically incorrect points) and a number of points about liberalism. You have however made no argument as to how your pathetic performance in prior debates shows youths to be incompetent nor have you shown that the arguments for liberalism are incorrect or proved the impossibility that young people can be non-liberal. Which, if one is to argue that all liberals are wrong and all youths are liberals needs to be established. First round: 0 cogent arguments. 1 offtopic rant.