Resolved: The Iranian Nuclear Deal is a "mistake."

I thought that it would be good to start the debate with some political humor. Contention 1: Iranian support for international terrorism It has been no secreate that for a long time that Iran has been sponsering international terrorism. One of their greatest terror affilates is that of Hezbollah. In fact the US State Department reported that in 2012 the terror organization and Iran have reached the greatest amounts of collabertate terror strikes against foreign and western targets since the 1990s. [1] The CIA has even found that Muhammad Khatami, the Iranian Mullah (their Theocratic Leader) has been a huge sponser and affilat with Hezbollah. The Iranian Quod Forces were arrested in Tel Avi with photo graphs and plans to attack the US embassy. [1] Now who is the Iranian Quod forces you may ask? They are an organization that was estabilished by the Iranians after their Revolution to ensure that their revolution continues. Israeli Prime Minister Netayahu had revealed that the deal gives Iran $300 billion in compensation over the economic turmoil that the nation had to endure over the embargo. He even gave the insite that Iran is producing IBMs to reach the US eastern seaboard to the point that in a decade when the Nuclear weapons embargo ends that they will have the projectile and range to each, Boston, New York, and even Washington DC. [2] Not to mention that the deal allows them to buy and sell weaponry in which they can use to support Hezbollah and other terror regeims. Many in the US and around the world believe that Iran will help and be a "force for good" in the middle east, but that is highly mistaken. Here we can see that more likely then not will Iran seek to aid ISIS, but they will help them create the world wide Islamic Empire. All we have to do is look to the Iranian Constitution in which it doesn't recognize many boarders and will supress its own civilization with Shia Law. [3] Not to mention that it's own IRGC and Quod Forces are pushing for more and more attacks against "infidelic" nations. Obama is misinterperting the Iranian intervention as a sign that they are in it for the defeat of ISIS, but what we really need to remember is that he is actually support Al-Asaad in Syria by trying to push ISIS out of Syria. [4] Iran has even gone as far as to try and to down play ISIS saying that it could be delt with quickly and in some cases has reported that they have been pushed out of Iraq, though we know that's far from the truth. [5] Western allies believe that Iran will have a major involvement, but we can see that Iran's devotion to little boots on the ground and lead from behind stance that Iran will not be a major player in the war to combat ISIS. [6] The nuclear deal even goes as far as to the US having to protect Iran if it gets attacked by a foreign enity to the point where this is now a direct conflict of interest with Israel and is the very foreign entanglement issue that George Washington warned about when he left office. Contention 2: Iran's gradualism to getting the bomb. We have all known that Iran has been enriching Uranium for quite some time, but we can see that their enrcihment has gradually gotten them closer and closer to getting the bomb. In a graph bellow we can see just how close Iran is getting to being able to have the bomb. The IAEA reported that this graph showed that Iran ended up getting 50 killatons in 2 microseconds. The bomb the US dropped on Hiroshima was 15. We can see by this very evidence that they are getting extremely close to getting the bomb. Throughout the years Iran has been getting closer and closer and we can see that they might be the next North Korea or Pakistan. Iran currently has enought LEUs inorder to build 11 nuclear weaponry. Their production has skyrocketted. [7] To further the fuel to the fire we can see that Iran is now able to inspect their own centrafuges in a new accord by the IAEA. [8] With that Iran is able to report however many Centerfuges it "has" and will inspect those and report back to the IAEA. It is very possible to create one underground or with the large cave systems the nation has. Many Centrafuges would be very hard to detect and getting a huge gain here would be huge in whipping out Israel and if you don't believe me take it from Marco Rubio. . http://www.youtube.com... was orginially that Iran couldn't enrich at all, then it was that they could enrich up only under 20%, then it was you could enrich to 20% but send it overseas, now it's you can enrich but only for a research purposes. Before you know it we'll be building Iran a bomb for him. "- Marco Rubio Contention 3: Oil FloodingWe have to look at another key aspect here and it's the oil market. Oil has already been at a new low not seen since late 2008. Though many average Americans think that this is a good thing for cheeper gas and food prices, but this is creating more problems that it will cause. Iran is and will flood the oil market as soon and it will only spell trouble for oil producers world wide. [9] This will drop prices significantly where even the Wall Street Journal has reported that a drop in oil prices down to nearly $30 per barrel. This will cripple oil production around the world, even OPEC. With prices this low it will force American oil produces and producers around the world will have to go under and even with cuts it won't be enough to keep these comapnies a float. [10] This will create a massive splash that mirrors that of the Baby Boom, but for oil. This is something that will bankrupt many companies causing an energy crisis that will spike oil prices upwards and many people will go out of buisness. This has began to happen with many companies and we need to observe bellow we can see how many companies are loosing money and at a large amount. Sources1. (. http://www.nydailynews.com...)2. (. http://www.forbes.com...) 3. (. http://www.forbes.com...)4. DINA ESFANDIARY AND ARIANE TABATABAI' s interview with Mohammad Javad Zarif, New York, 19 Sept. 2014.5. DINA ESFANDIARY AND ARIANE TABATABAI' s interviews with officials in Tehran, 13–16 June 2014.6. ‘Vakonesh-e Rouhani be khabar-e emkan-e soghout-e Karbala o Najaf/Mahdoudiat-i dar amaliat nakhahim dasht’ [Rouhani’s reaction to the news of possibility of the fall of Karnataka and Naka], Mehr News, 25 Aug. 2014.7. ( . http://www.washingtonpost.com...)8. ( . http://www.wsj.com...)9. (. http://www.wallstreetdaily.com...)10. (. http://www.wsj.com...)