I am richer than my opponent

Firstly, I’d like to point out that my opponent’s story is unlikely to be true. His story has too many similarities that make it likely he lying. He happens to be born in New York City where I was born. He happens to have his own “Reece Pole” that can speak Chinese (actually called Mandarin). He also attended some school that he fails to mention and drop out of this school to amass billions of dollars. Sounds a lot like my story in a way. His story seems highly unlikely. You say your father, who went to medical school, had a business mindset? He gave you it by yelling at you because of soggy presents? What? Then you discredit all of that after exclaiming you were just fascinated by the process of web-design. This means you would have ventured your business ideas without your father’s influence. Your father’s rage does not help you in any way. Grandpa’s net worth is 7 billion dollars and father can’t afford good presents and has to work hard? Yeah right. I’d like my opponent to tell me more about this Chinese Tumblr website? I refuse to believe that a website about travel blogging, something few people do, is going to make you 2.5 million dollars. I also want to know the names of the gambling websites in Australia and Japan. You never mention what schools you went to or towns/places you stayed at. Kind of fishy if you ask me. I’m sorry that you moved away due to complications that you don’t want to mention. I respect that, however, that should not be counted as sympathy points for the voter. Let’s keep the debate to what it is really about: being richer. I’ve already won! Oh my goodness, my opponent admitted defeat in his own words! He says he has a net worth of 2.9 billion. Last time I checked 3.3 billion is greater than 2.9 billion. Even if his story is true, which I doubt, I still am richer. He even admitted it! That should win me the debate right there. Also, make note that the amount of money going to be inherited by his grandfather does not count for net worth unless his grandfather is dead. His grandfather is not dead therefore it is not considered his money. Thus, I am richer. Attention, my opponent is trying to change the definition and purpose of the debate. The purpose of the debate was for us to argue on who is richer (in terms of money). Notice what my opponent agreed to. It had nothing to do with a deeper farfetched definition of the word rich (see vocabulary above). If my opponent wanted to do this, he should have mentioned this before the debate via private message or in the comment section. It is unfair for him to do this because I have already made my first argument under the rules I set. In a sense it would be giving my opponent an extra round if the rules were to be changed. Regardless of any explanation my opponent gives, he agreed to the original rules and those rules should be followed. Even if I was to allow a change in the rules which I'm not going to. .. My opponent says he went through struggles in his life. I have gone through struggles too. There is nothing more humbling than being homeless. Until you are homeless and hit rock bottom, you do not quite know exactly what that is like. I’m sure you’ve had your hard spots in life, but so have a lot of people. I’m glad you are multicultural, but it doesn’t prove anything. Everyone has knowledge in their own field. You may be good with oral language and computers. I’m knowledgeable with money, investing, and using my social skills to market desire in other people for goods/services. Notice that my knowledge has to do with being rich as described in the definition. His knowledge allows him… culture… I guess. Cool for you, but doesn’t help prove you are richer than me. My opponent thinks being rich involves: wisdom, personal experience, intelligence, and character. My opponent is 18 years old and I am 22. That already says things about wisdom and personal experience. Intelligence isn’t something we can truly measure here since it involves a wide spectrum of things. Character? What! ? My opponent is trying to change the rules of the debate when he already agreed to the rules given when he said “I accept! ” Does that sound like good character to you? Not to mention his gambling website built in Japan. Online gambling in Japan is illegal and thus, an act of crime. Not that any of that matters anyway, because the point is I have 3.3 billion and my opponent has 2.9 billion. Boom! I am richer. End of story.