The earth is a sphere

AtmosphereSo the vast vacuum of space has no chance vs the pull of the earth, that's some real power! Yet birds and smoke, have no problem taking off and defying gravity? We still have an atmosphere because there's a dome of silicate. Since I "must explain it" SatellitesHow is it more cost effective to scan the earth several(I'm assuming more than 6) times, using several different cameras, and pay a guy to stitch it together, than to turn the discover (or any of the others flying around out there) around, and take a while picture of where it came from? It's not. With the money were paying it should be comparable to the composites. I can understand not doing this often, but never? My point is if they're just scanning sections of the earth and stitching them, could this be done on a flat earth? Yes. As for being accurate? We'll have to let the voters be the judge, so far I have without a doubt provided ample proof most, if not all images from NASA are a Photoshop rendition of reality, and not actual reality. Easier to launch lol you could put an expensive camera on a high altitude plane and come up with a composite. That cognitive dissonance is affecting your common sense.I understand fully how the you are here image was produced, in Photoshop, but you dodged my point, it looks like any other image they provide, so how can we tell what is a real photo, or merely another "representation"? As you have already admitted, most videos are shot through fish eye lens and they look like the live feed they provide. You have to compare with both the fish eye lens and the real, non fish eye videos to see that the curve is the same as the fish eye, with the peak of the horizon at eye level, crop the feed off where the blackness of space starts, and paste a stationary piece of equipment like the piece of aluminum that's holding its own in fluctuating temperatures of up to 2500° C! It would be a lump of glowing hot liquid. Do green screens not exist in your world? With the multi-million dollar NASA income, it isn't hard to do some video editing. Though this is harder to prove, the most damming evidence is the fake videos from inside and around the iss, when humans get in the picture. Multiple bubbles seem to come out from places. swim kicking... don't worry about that toolbox, the scuba divers will pick it up off the green screen after the show.https://youtu.be... And little slip ups like saying you are filming in the US...https://youtu.be... these guys are simply hanging upside down! Check out those red faces.http://www.wildheretic.com...CircumnavigationThe link pro provided about a guy going across Antarctica is doubtful, and this is the only person on earth who did it, and it took a little over a month! Antarctica is over 5 million square miles according to ballers model. Several seaman have gone around Antarctica, and the fastest took 1 year and 3 months, which doesn't line up. Early travelers like captain cook did this and said he took 60,000 nautical miles and 3-4 years, the video didn't show that he went from one coast to the other, as you can see in the flat earth map, there are several peninsula that he may have treked to on skis, in blizzards, etc. I did a little more research, not just a wiki link. The edge may or may not be there, it may be an infinite plain. Admiral Byrd was the first to take a plane there, and now you can't just go there and explore, you have to get permission, and you will be guided. The Antarctic treaty, which is the longest treaty ever held, makes sure no one gets close to finding out.https://en.m.wikipedia.org...GravityAs for a reasonable explanation about why things go down, we may never know, several theories exist, and sound a lot better than what mainstream provides, like the flat earth is ascending, but NONE can be proven, and the bop rests on pro, so I can't say exactly. Now whether that proves the earth is a globe? No. As you cannot show where the mass of an object causes things to stick to the bottom of, or orbit around it. As NASA and the science community used gravity as a catch-all to explain a number of things, these things are improbable as well.Which leads to the next statement about the core of the earth. Magnetic core huh? This would have to mean everything sticking to or orbiting the earth would have to be composed of metal! False. Molten lava comes from underground doesn't prove the earth is round, but it may be proof of a real hell.Dipping distancesI'm sure a powerful telescope could see some distance more, but you are still using your eye, and you can't see that far even with the best amateur telescope available as wave can reach 800 ft, and these would only blend in with the horizon as wellhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk... 4 meters lol.High photosThe horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Any curvature shown is only the line which the sun has stopped illuminating. The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it. SunYes there is a flare, but there is also flare at ground level, none look this big, and you wouldn't see a hotspot if it weren't right above the clouds. Go fast When did Australia not reside on the opposite of the globe from the United States? Of course pro provided a bad link as proof of this, and there are no more chances of rebuttal, I will say this, if it were even close to not being blocked by the earth, it would be closer to the horizon, and since it is so very small, proofed that it does not go around the earth, only goes a distance away from the United States so that it blends in with the horizon.StarsNot saying math doesn't have a great deal in science, just that if you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it fully, some voters may not understand complex equations, and these laws often include factors used by the disposable gravity.