The earth is a sphere

First of all, about the pressure gradient, it doesn't sound plausable, please explain further. I don't think I can buy it, common sense should tell you that if a vacuum is close to a non vacuum medium, said medium will be lost in such a vast vacuum without proper barriers. I hope the voters have some. Maybe a source could validate this claim.About the satellites, of course they have satellites that are further out, so why can't they put a camera on one of these satellites? Seems a lot of trouble to make several scans of earth, then put them together in Photoshop, while making up the missing pieces, and you can't even get the scale right? it just doesn't make sense. With the some 2500+ satellites in orbit for some several decades, we should have hundreds if not thousands of videos and pictures of earth circulating. As you point out, Russia claims one, we have a handful from one supposed trip to the moon.If we don't have any satellites light years away, how did they come up with the you are here image? It looks a lot like the rest of the images NASA spits out, like those shown from Hubble and others,they did a real good job creating this image in Photoshop! Hmmm. pluto is my favorite lol.As for the video, I meant a video of the full earth, in rotation, not a fisheye stream from high altitude. https://youtu.be...As for the copying and pasting, that photo, which I thought you could recognize is the 2002 official composite image from NASA. Feel free to download it from them and zoom in yourself.As for words in clouds, especially this one, no, just... No, not in an official release from NASA, common sense will tell anyone this was purposely put here. An elephant, yes, a symbol, perhaps, a letter, maybe, but a string of letters together in a line forming that spells sex? Lol...On the day NASA chose to take a picture? Impossible.Maybe you can't see 2500+ satellites halfway to the moon, but 2500 giant pieces of aluminum would reflect light back to the camera, especially if the earth were totally lit by the sun on the side of the observer. Also, with no atmosphere, there has to be at least one star visible!?CircumnavigationApologies, I'm doing all of this from my cell and I'm not sure why this part was left out, but the flat earth model is disc shaped with north being dead center of the disc, and the universe for that matter, going from this point in any direction will take you south, taking a left or right will take you east or west respectively. Taking the path of the sun moon and stars as shown here. GravitySmoke rises against gravity, as do other things, in not saying things don't fall down, that's ignorant, if you wanna call that gravity, that's up to you, I'm saying, once again, nothing proves that by the sheer mass of an object, things will be stuck to, attracted to, or orbits around it. Ever. As far as I can tell, what's at the center of the earth is only a theory, sure you can come up with a hypothesis, and do some reverse math or what have you to prove this to some, but as a record stands of 6 miles deep we've ever dug, we haven't broken through the crust, so it is non provable. Therefore nonusable in this debate. The picture in all textbooks showing the multiple layers of the earth is a lie, if they even got past the crust, how do they get a probe through all that molten lava?GyroscopesConcededDipping distancesThe reason lighthouses are high altitude is not to see it over any curve, there is sea splash, wells, and waves, which cause little or no visibility at lower altitudes.Even powerful telescopes will not let you see hundreds of miles over swells, waves etc. But as my video shows, when something appears to go over the curve of the earth, a telescope will prove this wrong.High photos So, the anomaly that makes the earth appear to be concave when the horizon is below the focus point has nothing to do with it appearing to be convex when it is above? Try again. This lens turns any straight line not centered into a curved one. But it can never break the other rule of the horizon, it always rises to the eye of the observer, if you will notice the peak of the horizon is always eye level with the observer, if the iss were actually in orbit, far away from a ball, the horizon would drop as the curve fell away, and any non fishy videos showing slight curvature have only seen the extent of the sun's spotlight rays.Https://en.m.wikipedia.org... I see you haven't watched or figured out how the rocket launch proves flat earth, do this with me, go watch the go fast rocket launch, sadly it was shot using a gopro, as shown by the "waving " horizon, but if you pause the video just as the rocket reaches a peak(stopping abruptly), and starts to fall, you should see a familiar face. Keep this in mind when you enter the time and date in the description into this useful website. Or I'll do it for you rather. http://www.timeanddate.com...They are based in The usa, lad Vegas or new Mexico, and the sun appears to be in the right spot, but the tiny moon should only be visible from the opposite side of the globe, because it is above Australia.StarsPro has provided a bad link for a source and is henceforth building an argument from nothing. I hope you can fix this, and maybe leave the math out of this, remember "with observation and scientific experiments. "