9/11 was a false flag event

I watched the second plane hit the WTC live in real time. I also saw the videos taken by individuals from hundreds of viewpoints. A plane hit the tower. I've seen the conspiracy theory that no plane hit and it was added in later. This would mean the government literally bought the city of New York to stage the whole thing. Yeah right. Pro: "As far as the motive is concerned, I previously stated that from day one Bush was actively seeking a way into Iraq. " This is speculation. I don't see any logical reason for Bush to "want to invade Iraq". His father invaded Iraq, but it was because Iraq invaded Kuwait. What would be Bush Jr's motive for an invasion? Just for giggles? What exactly did we gain in this war? More national debt and lost soldiers? * Pro: "War games were allegedly taking place on 911. " Notice the word "allegedly". * Pro: "Bush was briefed before 911 that terrorists were planning to use planes to attack the US. " A typical brief of the President. We are constantly under threat. Most are ignored for this reason. * Pro: "Bush and Cheney refused to testify separately as the commission requested. They also refused to testify under oath. " They must have had good lawyers. Any good lawyer will try to keep you from testifying even if innocent of any crime. The best way to win a battle in court is to never get in unneccessary ones in the first place. . https://www.justice.gov... . http://litigation.findlaw.com... . https://expertbeacon.com... * Pro: "I have no evidence to prove that these people were lying, being threatened, or being bribed to give these witness accounts. " I agree. * Pro: "Evidence can be planted. " True, but as is typical in the U. S. judicial system, you still have to prove it, or it is speculation. * Pro: "Pillars are still intact where the wings are claimed to have impacted. If the wings were ripped off, there would have been a massive amount of debris to support the claim. " I've done many science experiments that yielded unexpected results. Things don't always happen as you think it should. I could give complex examples, but I'll give a simple one. Example: If you shake up a bottle of pop, it will probably spew when you open it. But it doesn't always. Why? It just didn't work out that way that time. The point? Trying to simulate what would happen when 2 massive skyscrapers with unknown chemical contents are hit by planes with unknown chemical contents is impossible. There are some things when mixed become toxic, explosive, highly flammable, etc. . https://www.buzzfeed.com... . http://www.fireengineering.com... * Pro: "The photos prove that there was no plane that struck the pentagon. " I've seen the photos. I cannot tell what hit the Pentagon other than to say something powerful. I can also say that rockets/missiles could make bigger, much more unorthodoxed holes. I can also beleieve the limbs of the plane(tail, wings) were clipped off or crumpled inwards on impact. * Pro: "The black box was allegedly found but the information it was supposed to yield conflicted greatly between the NTSB and 911 commission report. They tell two different very contradicting stories. " This is typical in most any case. This is why it takes a series of evidence, testimonies, etc to come to the best conclusion. What I would conclude from the complete package of information is: 1)Many witnesess saw a plane headed at the Pentagon flying low. 2)Physical evidence: Something big hit the Pentagon. 3)Planes hit the WTC the same day. Verdict: A plane hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. * Pro: "And yet despite all these witnesses the physical evidence still tells a different story. " Pro would have to prove they were all lying and in a part of a mass conspiracy. If Pro could prove the witnesses all had something strange in common that he could present, then he might have a case, but he did not in this debate, thus it is speculation. * Conclusion: Is Pro wrong? Probably, but even if he is not, he has eye witness accounts, unknown variables, and the concept of how complex and difficult it would be to create the theoretical scenario he is claiming. Thanks.