God Exists And Is Both Omnipotent And Omnibenevolent

Thank you Con for your reply, however, I can't find the term “Chewbacca” in Dictionary.com. I hope you are not expressing a form of “intimidation.”My God is the order of the universe, order exists in the universe; therefore, my God exist. Con stated, “So the temporal concept, creating/creation, is not possible before the expression of matter/energy and space/time (the big bang) from quantum fluctuations. Therefore our universe was not created, rather it was expressed.”Thank you Con for the enlightenment of your belief in the origin of the “big bang.” There are many competing theories of what caused the “big bang,” and I regret to say the science of metrology is not yet mature enough to that level of empirical investigation. If the order of the universe (God) was “expressed” via the “big bang,” then God (the order of the universe) via the Constructal Law (the handwriting of God) deals with flow starting from the “big bang”, to create stars, to the elements in the Periodic Table made from those stars, to DNA made from those elements, to living systems made from DNA, to life's Unalienable Rights interacting with those living systems and physical nature, to “spontaneous order” and the “invisible hand” from those interactions, to market systems from “invisible hand” creating technology etc; hence, Debate.org, to Natural Law from “spontaneous order”, finally ending at Natural Law forming the foundation to the flow of political-philosophies creating man-made laws. On the other hand, after the “big bang” if the order of the universe (God) was not “expressed,” we would not have a “creator” of those stars, resulting in a null universe, or a universe at all. I hope the above two paragraphs also satisfies Con's comment, “Pro also takes a concept, like order, and claims it is an agent in the creation of the universe without providing any explanation as to how order managed to create the universe.” It would seem Con is having issues with the “self-evident” nature of Unalienable Rights by his following statement, “Pro takes abstract ideas like "unalienable rights" and treats them as concrete "animate" items.”The relationship or manifestation of Unalienable Rights being an animate representation of the Constructal Law is elementary. Unalienable Rights---“Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”---corresponds to the three primitives found in all living systems down to the single-cell level. To exemplify, once an organism comes to (1) “Life,” it has the (2) “Liberty” to (3) pursue survival; otherwise, there is no life. Underlying “the pursuit of” survival is the notion that most accomplished objectives result in some form of chemical/electrical positive feedback or “Happiness” for humans. The Constructal Law:“For a finite-size flow system to persist in time (to live), its configuration must evolve freely in such a way that provides easier access to the currents that flow through it.”Symmetry between the Constructal Law and Unalienable Rights:For a finite-size flow system to persist in time (to live) [“Life”], its configuration must evolve freely [“Liberty”] in such a way that provides easier access [“the pursuit of”] to the currents that flow through it [positive feedback for all life, or “Happiness” for us humans].Please see the following book-trailer for an overview: Con stated, “If this god created the entire universe, why are there things in the universe that aren't benevolent?” The term “benevolent” is simply relative. May I ask the question; do you [Con] think your existence, from this universal order (God), was not a “benevolent” event? Morality (the fingerprint of God) by nature is “Omnibenevolent” and the outgrowth of life's Unalienable Rights. If Con is having issues with Morality being part of the physical Laws of Nature (God's handwriting), it would be my pleasure to elaborate in the next round. In closing, God (the order of the universe) exist and is both Omnipotent and Omnibenevolent.