Stalin did not Practice Communism Effectively

First of all if an entire population got to vote on every single issue it would end up in chaos. People in general, are ignorant and selfish. They will vote for the thing that sounds most appealing to them without knowing or aknowledging it's downsides. Most people will vote in self interest and they won't care about a society as a whole. And the ignorant assumption that the majority is always right, is flat out wrong. Winston Churchill said "the best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." So essentially Churchill was saying exactly what i'm saying, that most voters are stupid when it comes to politics. And giving a bunch of stupid people the power to vote for every single issue which could determine life and death is stupid. Instead people who know what they are doing should present a package of ideas and policies and then people get to vote for those who makes most sense, in that way we won't atleast starve a country to death in 2 years because of idiotic policies voted by emotional and uninformed individuals. And btw. what will happen if the people doesn't vote the way of your ideology? What if they want a capitalist system? Second of all it really is amazing that the instigator is talking about modern technologies that are created by the capitalist system. Most modern technologies were created in either USA, Japan, Israel or South Korea, four of the most capitalist countries that have ever existed. So there is no doubt that Sollertis actually agrees that capitalism creates advancement atleast in technology. And this is the system he wants to replace with a system that doesn't have a market, that doesn't encourage competition, that doesn't reward accomplishments,. He wants to eliminated all the factors that creates success and advancement. And also, all these "technological advancements" that was brought up actually does not even exist. There will never be an automated machine that produces unlimited food or shelter, and nowhere near close will there be machines that replaces most services that exists today. You can't call a robot to come to your home and fix your sink or have a robot drive a transport vehicle on a road among other human controlled cars for example. Machines always needs someone to design them, someone mine the materials needed, someone to build them, someone to repair them. Machineries are required maintenance and that will never change. And the instigator is also saying that basically everything shall be free. Food shall be free, shelters shall be free (do you mean we shall live in shelters?), healthcare shall be free and education shall be free. However this is all just an utopian dream and it definitely won't work in practice. The dream that no one has to work. That money and technologies are just going to come raining down from heaven. That the government is going to listen to the people (never going to happen, governments always turn tyrannical if they get the chance). And by the way, you say that 100% of people should aquire free education, and that they shall spend their time researching and studying. What happens when most people doesn't show up to school? Because most won't. What will happen? Will they be put in jail or will the police point a gun to their head and make them go? Or will there even be a police force? And then you are talking about studies made in two major communist countries where it citizens are heavily oppressed by their own government. First of all, how do we know that these studies are true? The government could just have faked them all, and they most likely have. But even if those studies were true it would only be a small portion of people who would be willing to do what you're saying. I can say with big confidence that atleast 95% of an entire population would not be willing to do what your ideology is proposing. They would not be willing to work without being rewarded, what would you do then? Even if only 1% of the population refused to do what your idology wants them to do, what would you do then? Ultimately you will have to point a gun to their head and make them do what you want. And then we are back to where communism always ends up. Again, you don't seem to understand the difference between theory and practice. Communism in practice won't work like it does in theory, because the theory doesn't make sense with reality. USSR, China, Cuba, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam etc. They were all communist states. Even if you didn't like the turnout, that is communism in practice. Even if you don't want to accept it, Communism is responsible for over 100 million deaths. So let's abandon this ideology.