Atheism just another I believe blah blah

Can an ant or a cat or even the most intelligent Ape describe human civilizations? Absurd. Why absurd? These lower species lack the development to speak with human beings. An Ape might communicate the simplests of abstract ideas, but no Ape yet has ever written a dissertation upon human civilization and presented this thesis to a University. And yet Man assumes that he has the mental development to describe the Gods? Mohammed declared that only one God rules supreme. Whereas the Church dogmatism declared God as a mysterious 3 that live as 1 - they labelled their new faith, the Trinity. Church dogma of the Trinity resulted in the persecution and slaughter of entire communities. Both these religions stand upon - personally believing and accepting some type of theologica belief system. I - all belief systems express Egotism - I believe that jesus son of Zeus is the son of God (brother of Hercules) - [another illegitimate child fathered by Zeus], I believe that this God ... has 3 parts father/son/holy spirit. My belief in this 3 part God its a mystery to me which i do not understand but I believe as an act of faith. Then you have this dude Mohammed, who claimed the title of illiteracy. Marvel at the poety of his koran - surely that's proof that the Angel Gabrael dictated the koran. This dude claims himself to be a prophet in the line of the Hebrew prophets. Yet his book - even though it makes a matra of the word "prophet", can not distinguish that undefined term from an Angel - another undefined term. The first word of the Torah of Moses B'ra'shet; this word in Hebrew contains within its 6 letters. (By simply re-arranging the order of the letters in that first word [An example in English: God/Dog] its possible to form the words brit fire). Brit means alliance in the Torah literature. The term "fire" refers to the responsibility of making oaths. For example, shortly after the Creation story, the story of the floods which killed virtually all of Mankind except for Noah. What caused these terrible floods? The Talmud answers this questions with the teaching warning against swearing false oaths. The 1st Book of that 5 part Hebraic code tells story after story of men and nations establishing a oath brit alliances. For example: Jacob made an oath brit alliance with his father in law. You being a military man you know the value of people forging a military or economic alliance. To cut an alliance requires terms that the parties forging this said alliance agree to honor and keep. Trust between the 2 allies, its measured by the strictness by which the allies honor and respect the terms of their alliance. Abraham,Isaac and Jacob made an oath brit alliance with Avi-melech. The latter king ruled over a people which the Book of Samuel refers to as Jebusites. The city state of Avi-melech's kingdom: Jerusalem. Avi-melech sought to establish an alliance between his city state and Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob - rich and powerful land owning shepherds. Yet in the days of David, Avi-melech's descendents referred to Jacob as a cripple and to Isaac as a blind man. How did David, a military man, honor that oath alliance? He slaughtered the Jebusites and drove them out of Jerusalem. Thereafter he made Jerusalem the Capital of his kingdom. This term brit, represents a key political idea in the Torah/Constitution of the Davidic kingdom. In Hebrew the name of the former USSR contains the word "brit"; the name of the United States, in Hebrew likewise contains the word "brit". Both of these two world powers claimed to exist as a Republic! The term brit, in Hebrew, means both 1. alliance and 2. Republic. In the case of the 12 tribes which made an alliance to conquer the kingdoms within the lands of Canaan, the union of these 12 tribes formed a larger Republic. The foreign bible translations and koran - both translated brit as covenant. An alliance requires that the allies swear an oath based upon clearly defined terms or conditions of agreement. The Torah as the Constitution of the Hebrew Republic [unlike Xtianity or Islam] did not stand upon theological belief systems. In point of fact, the 2nd commandment at Sinai: do not worship other Gods, directly acknowledges that other Gods live. Clearly Mohammeds' strict Monotheism differed with the Sinai revelation!! Having watered down the concept of brit linked to making an oath alliance, both religions replaced the key term brit, with a totally undefined term - "covenant". Both ego based belief systems of Xtianity and Islam changed the focus away from oath alliances. Both religions replaced the concept of people conducting diplomacy to forge an oath alliance; and replaced brit with I believe that Jesus son of Zeus is the son of God; or I believe that Mohammed is the prophet and that only Allah lives as God. Both of these bogus egotistical belief systems stand upon the premise that the lives of the Gods human belief and theology determines. Both religions turned the concept of swearing an oath alliance upon its head. Man, according to these religions possesses the power to determine the nature of the Gods! By this arrogance Man stands eye to eye with the Gods. Plenty of men have in fact declared themselves as being a God. Caesar declared himself as being the son of God. The ancient Hebrews made no such presumptions about Man. Man ruled over animals and nature, except when the animals preyed upon Man, and floods or drought proved that Man existed on a lower order of power than nature. Other people hence declared that the Gods live as one with nature. Spinoza's philosophy embraced this type of pantheism. The rabbis placed Spinoza into charem/ex-communication. This brings us to the subject of this debate challenge. It seems to me that atheism exists as the flip side of the coin of religious belief in God(s). Just as Man lacks the development to prove the existence of this or that God, so too atheists lack the development to disprove the existence of this or that God. Look who's calling the kettle black type of Status quo ante - action/reaction - religious/atheist, bi-polor none sense.