Wii vs PS3

===Pro Case===(A) Innovation.Instead of responding to my own refutations of his argument, my opponent has merely re-claimed his contention without actually responding to my point that the PS3 has also innovated the gaming market at least as much as the Wii, if not more. 3d capabilities, the media keyboard, and the inclusion of Blu-ray were not in any way refuted by my opponent. The only point my opponent actually responded to was the point of 3D capabilities for the PS3. And even there all my opponent claims is "the failure of 3D on consoles" without any sourced substantiation provided. (B) Reliability.On reliability, my opponent responds to my point (in which I showed that the apparent differences in reliability between the two consoles can be mostly explained by the levels of use by users, making them more equally comparable in those terms) by arguing that (A) the Wii playing time would OBVIOUSLY be lower and (B) that the Wii attracts a family audience who are likely to use their consoles for shorter intervals. I'll simply point out that I can accept both of these points while my main point still remains not contended against. All I had to show was that the Wii does not have the PS3 beat in terms of reliability. I showed this and all my opponent made as a response was an attempted explanation at WHY the Wii is used less. But that's not the point. The point is that both consoles are of comparable reliability according to the only statistics provided by either my opponent or myself in this debate. Just explaining why does not refute the point itself.(C) Familial Enjoyment.My opponent has completely dropped this argument and makes no reference to it in his R4. In R3, I showed that the PS3 provides many of the same products which contribute to more familial or elderly enjoyment of video games, while also showing that these products (like the Play Station Move) were actually rated as being of better quality then their Wii counterparts like the Wii remote. No response to this was provided by my opponent in his final round and thus he has dropped it.===Con Case===Contention. Comparative Game Quality.I'd like to note to readers that my opponent has dropped both of his counter-contentions against my main point of game quality. In my R2 I provided my main contention in favor of the superiority of the PS3, drawing on the superior game quality of the games it released. In order to show this, I provided multiple statistics comparing the critical reviews of PS3 games as compared to Wii games. The statistics showed that beginning after 2006 and continuing on to the present, Sony has released not only more critically accepted games, but has actually released less as my opponent was kind enough to share. This means that as a percentage of critically accepted games to the number of overall released games, PS3 has the Wii beat even more. My opponent responded by contending that both Metacritic provides biased reviews in that its reviews don't positively correlate to the popularity of the game. I disproved this by showing not only that popularity does not mean quality (in that the latest "Alvin and The Chipmunks" movie was more financially successful in regards to ticket sales then "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo"), but by also pointing out that my opponent didn't actually provide positive evidence for his contention of buying off reviews. My opponent responded to neither of these points in his last round, therefore he has dropped them.===Conclusion===While my opponent provided an adequate opening case in his R2, he totally failed to respond to my own contentions or to defend his own from my critiques. Along with him completely dropping his own contention of familial enjoyment and innovation from my refutations, my opponent has also dropped his own attempted refutations of my own positive case in favor of PS3 superiority. Any of my contentions which my opponent actually did respond to were either based on faulty equivocation, arguments from popularity, or based on unsourced and unsubstantiated assertions. Therefore, I urge a Con vote. Also, much thanks to my opponent for the chance at this debate. I certainly learned quite a bit about an issue which I don't normally find myself contemplating!