If the Christian God and his army of angels exists then we should follow the teaching of the bible.

My first response is quite simply, the bible does not have to be true on this issue as it has nothing to do with god existing. We will build off of that now. Because Satan could not possibly have created the Old Testament, and because my opponent declared that God and his army of angels exists, I will suspect that our definitions of God remain and he is the God of the OT because his angels and Satan exist (should add that if my opponent accepts that god exists, then he needs to accept how we define what god is and from where, with a non defined god, the premise is blank and he could make up anything about god's powers or satan's powers or anything else existing like a giant jellyfish who makes macaroni and cheese.) Gods existence, includes his requirements; requirements are faith, rules of faith are handed down via prophets and into text. His argument of Satan corrupting and people worshipping him to this day are not valid. Examples in Cases: First Case: The Jewish Because God exists, so must have the Old Testament, because that is not Satan's work, as my opponent has claimed. In Isaiah God punishes Baal worshippers, he even curses the Jews who worshipped the golden calf with wandering in the desert for 40 years and cursed them to not reach the promised land alive. Why wouldn't he do the same to the Satan/Jesus followers? Isn't he a jealous god? The unnamed Angel of the Lord in the Old Testament is said by some to be the pre-incarnate Christ. So, even if Jesus was just a prophet as the Muslims claim, he was still known by Satan from the OT's statement. Second Case: The Muslims Because God exists, and his angels exist; Gabriel exists. Gabriel gave Muhammad God's word. Why didn't Gabriel tell him to slay the "Satan Worshippers?" And why was Muhammad told that Jesus was a prophet? Third Case: Satan is still accountable to god. Everything is in His domain. There is no hell before the bible. OT is helless (in other words, Satan has no domain in the OT). Satan has no domain to bring his "followers" to. God still has power over satan; prayer can be used against him, God can cure "diseases" that Satan has created. God defeated Satan when he rebeled. Fourth Case: Not all religions believe in a god. All of the religions that go against contradict Christianity can not be of Satan's making. They are usually philosophies on life and or pre-OT. There are religions that worship men from world war II in remote islands who have had them crash land there, therefore Satan really couldn't have created all of the chaos (or for sure Islam and the Jewish faith since the angels brought down prophesies.) Fifth Case: The Birth of Jesus Gabriel came and told Mary of the birth of Jesus (and pretty much impregnated her if you think about it, right then with him.) Gabriel is god's angel, again. If you are saying the whole bible was just written by Satan (which it couldn't have been, in our case of everything's existence, because of the disciples. They wrote their individual Gospels.) Sixth Case: Even if Satan really did it... Jesus did good things in the bible, like preach love, charity, understanding (and some things still taught in the OT). So, even if Satan really did it, Satan was teaching some good values apparently, and people following this wouldn't be a bad thing. There is no hell if there is no bible truth, so even if the Christians follow the bible, it's not like they are going there. Satan is pretty much doing something pointless. And people have killed through the use of all religions (even the Jewish faith, we can see clearly, in the OT, and the Muslim faith, we can see clearly, today), but that doesn't mean that the MAJORITY of the Christians don't live out normal, productive, and sane lives. I only see the fanatics that take the word of the bible to a radical scale doing things like that (and they usually interpret many things differently, and do not notice the "Thou shall not murder" aspect of it all.) Seventh Case: God's presence is only known via text. Without the prophets (whom the angels informed) and the texts that he supplied the Jews, God wouldn't be known. He also came down constantly in the OT, his angel Loki mostly, to destroy and punish bad followers (again, which he should have done to the Satan followers). So, therefore, the OT stands in my former arguments. Eighth Case: Satan is an angel. Angels, yes, can cure people and send messages, but they can not "split their conscious." There is no evidence of an angel doing this or this being powers that were given to the angels. Ninth Case: Jesus did not preach not believing in God. How can god be letting Satan do this as a "test" if Satan/Jesus wasn't even preaching "don't believe in God." So, how could he have been letting Satan test the people's faith in his existence? Therefore, because of my cases, if God existed with his army of Angels, I would follow the Bible. Happy Easter, Jesus/Satan. How nice of you to purposefully let the Romans tear you to pieces and die for humanity. Unless you are a masochist, Satan/Jesus, you really love human kind. You really are a good guy, Jesus/Satan. ;)