The gay Gestapo is preventing rational arguments against homosexuals.

Conservapedia "has received negative reactions from the mainstream media, as well as from notable political figures, including commentators and journalists, and has been criticized for bias and inaccuracies.[1]" Conservapedia is most notibally incorrect about the age of the universe, stating that "Young earth creation scientists advance a number of reasons for the earth and universe being approximately 6,000 years old[2]" This has been proven incorrect by NASA, who state that the WMAP mission "is in the Guinness Book of World Records for "most accurate measure of the age of the universe." The mission established that the cosmos is 13.75 billion years old, with a degree of error of one percent.[3]" With such a bias against science, Conservapedia cannot be relied upon as a reliable source. And even with this bias, even the article cited quotes several sources that confirm homosexual behavior in the animal kingdom. Note that homosexuality has some overlap with bisexuality. Animals that enjoy the sexual companionship of the same gender also enjoy the sexual companionship of different genders. Note that the second article cited, regarding the Ex-Gay movement[4], supports my position. Quote: "A large body of research and global scientific consensus indicates that being gay, lesbian, or bisexual is compatible with normal mental health and social adjustment. Because of this, major mental health professional organizations discourage and caution individuals against attempting to change their sexual orientation to heterosexual, and warn that attempting to do so can be harmful." My opponent stated that "Your sexual orientation, is the making of your 'programing' as a child" which relies on the obsolete cliam of the Tabula Rasa[5], meaning blank slate in Latin. This is the position of complete Nuture in the Nature vs Nurture debate. "This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of developmental influences, but since both types of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, most modern psychologists and anthropologists consider the question naive—representing an outdated state of knowledge[6]" My opponent stated that political extrememsts heckle. Note that extremests bomb abortion clinics, extremests claim that Obama is a muslim, and extrememsts kill in the name of Jesus. There are many forums for rational debate. On a college campus, both sides would be taking notes as the two positions squared off. If one tries to argue a point on the street corner one would be thought odd and perhaps asked to leave. If a person writes a book for either side, it will receive critique in the press if it is popular enough. This is normal.I challenge my opponent to come up with situations where heckling is allowed, and heckling is not allowed.By comparing the gays with Nazzi, Germany, I respectfully submit that my opponent is a political extremist.His conduct in the debate has been stellar. However, it has just occurred to me that the title of the debate allows me to win by default. There is no gay Gestapo. Nothing that comes even close.The Gestapo is "the German state secret police during the Nazi regime, organized in 1933 and notorious for its brutal methods and operations."The equivelant of the Gestapo in the United States is the FBI. They are not the ones heckling on the street corners. By definition, my opponent is stating that the FBI is conducting assanations on the anti gay movement. The very idea is ubsurd.[1] http://en.wikipedia.org... [2] http://www.conservapedia.com... [3] http://www.nasa.gov...[4] http://en.wikipedia.org...[5] http://en.wikipedia.org... [6] http://en.wikipedia.org...