Traffic lights either need to be replaced with humans, or manually operated.

Let us now finish this like small children 1 - Time Efficiency. So if we actually look at your evidence, you support me! What a happy ending! Remember, my entire suggestion is "traffic lights must be replaced, either with the old fashion rent-a-cop in the middle of the street to intelligently direct traffic, or an office were people manually operate the lights". These arguments FOR these incredibly high tech control centers, even the Jersey one, support my thesis, so high five for counter productiveness. I give you one of these http://blogs.indiewire.com... So, to conclude this section of the last round, my esteemed opponent agrees with me, even if he didn't realize it at the time. No takey-backsies. He may still have a problem with cops, even though they'd still surpass traffic lights, but he does agree human monitoring of traffic is better. So we'll move on. 2 - Anger Management What my opponent now shows are some shnazzy 'police' cars. However, when was the last time you got pulled over by a Porche or Ferrari? What these pictures are are nothing more than fancy cars with decals. If my opponent says overwise, then I bet he'd also agree the CEO of Red Bull drives this http://www.henniker.org.uk... Perhaps Jurassic Park exists? http://i167.photobucket.com... Or that the founder of Oscar Meyer drives up in this puppy http://cache.gawker.com... Cars that say simply say 'police' mean about as much as that nice looking cop in my opponents first round, until they're pulling you over and writing the ticket. None of these vehicles means that the coppers are on the mickey, just that there are really nice cars (probably show models or a cop-fest thing) with police written on them. So, decals aside, humans controlling traffic would still be better than an inaccurate computer program. 3 - Saving Gas I think you agreed that cops are dumb, I just said not much education would be needed to do hand signals. Oddly enough, these hand signals would still save the average drivers money on gas as it would allow for quicker and more sensible traffic directing. A light can't beat that deal. 4 - Creating Jobs That video was for point 5. Sometimes if you double check these things you figure that out. And this mass transit thing has nothing to do with this debate, so the reader should disregard it. But my plan would create jobs, whether the switch were to traffic cops or to office workers, because someone would have to do it. Plus on both ends. 5 - Screaming (cue watching first video) http://www.youtube.com... and that's all I have to say about that. So in conclusion, traffic lights are inefficient. They must be replaced with either traffic cops on the road, or people monitoring traffic via video and manually changing the lights. It would save you (the consumer) time, money, and patence. Instead of a program that does not always apply to the situation, there would be someone with a brain making choices that do work with what's going on. Who's your uncle? Bobs your uncle. And to finish this debate, I leave with this little bit of footage that has nothing to do with anything we've discussed http://www.youtube.com...