Contender chooses topic (Video Games)

I kindly remind Pro that he cannot argue in this round. Rebuttals =============== 3. Innovation The topic didn't stray from the main point. Games that are released very frequently can always stay up to date. For example, let's say you are creating a video game series, you could release games every year, or release games every 5 years. Assuming that your first game comes out in 2015, here is the technology you will have access to: Game 1:2015 Game 2:2016 Game 3:2017 Game 4:2018 Game 5:2019 Game 6:2020 Game 7:2021 Game 8:2022 etc. This means that your games will always be up to date with the newest technology. Now, if you chose the other option of releasing games every five years, here is the technology your games will have access to: Game 1: 2015 Game 2: 2020 Game 3: 2025 Game 4: 2030 Game 5: 2035 Game 6: 2040 As you can see, the option where you release games every year would make sure your games stay up to date with the newest technology. Games that are released every 5 years don't stay up to date. The franchise has a sudden spike of technology, making it up to date, however, in that next 4 year gap, the game is out of date. The technology is outdated since new technology came out that year, but you can't add it to your old game. As for losing appeal, you would lose interest. Yes, you would be hyped up for the next installment, but what about the most recent installment? After a year or two you may have nothing else to do in the game, you would've already unlocked most of the content and there's nothing new to explore. The game gets boring, that's why people are hyped up for a newer installment, they're bored. Furthermore, if the series stays dead for too long, people start to forget. Look at Half Life, yes, people are still sold on the idea that Half Life 2, episode 3 will come out soon, but the majority of people just use "Half Life 3 confirmed" as a joke now. Some people have already moved on to other games. So the franchise loses steam and valuable fans. 1. Multiplayer When setting up your Internet, it's a one time process, just like a computer. You also have pretty fast connections on console. The truth is, console multiplayer is superior to PC multiplayer, and Pro concedes this fact. 1. Marketing and Business Of course it's not the same to the McDonald's Monopoly campaign, I'm using it as an analogy. Again, it doesn't make the GAME better, just makes it more worthwhile. Pro's last bit of text is that you get a sweet camo that you can use. You also have awesome camos in COD Ghosts that you can use to personalize your load out and character. Conclusion ================ In conclusion, COD Ghosts is better than CS:GO, and COD is overall better than CS due to the following reasons: Newest graphic and performance technology, since it's more recent. You can have fun with your friends at the same house. There are more game modes that cater toward the non-competitive crowd, or parties. Single Player campaign to play Large, immersive maps Huge community Overall better multiplayer system And other reasons found in the previous rounds Thank you Pro for the awesome debate, and thank you voters for voting. Vote Con! Again, pro cannot argue in this round.