Legalizing gay marriage is morally good, Change my mind.

Gandhi and John Lennon did not have that much power, But since you are on the subject, Why not Mother Teresa, John Wesley or Jesus Christ while we are at it. People who really had good morals. Or were they too moral for you? Gay people at least real gay people. How can you tell the difference? Why isn't adultery natural, I mean, Most people do it. It would seem to me it is more natural than being gay. Gay people were not born like that. There"s been no firm evidence that there"s a genetic basis for homosexuality. But that"s never been one of our main points in arguing against homosexuality. We believe that people are born with all sorts of inborn tendencies that are sinful. Lots of heterosexual men don"t find monogamy very natural, But we don"t change God"s commands to allow for their sinful tendency. Many people find lying and cheating more advantageous in certain situations, But we still maintain that they are wrong. So to ask a somewhat politically-incorrect statement, If "I was born that way" makes homosexuality okay, What else does it make okay? What if there"s a genetic basis for pedophilia or incest? But in fact, We"re all "born that way" with regard to something"as descendants of Adam, We"re all sinners, And that"s precisely why Jesus had to come. Some people struggle with homosexual desires, Some people struggle with wrath and unforgiveness, Some people struggle with being truthful. Jesus saves us from the eternal consequences of our sin"I deserve Hell for the wrong things I"ve done, But Jesus has saved me from that by taking the penalty in my place. But Jesus isn"t content to stop there. He makes us legally righteous by taking the penalty on Himself so we can have His "innocent" sentence. But then He works in us to make us actually righteous"that"s called "sanctification", And it takes time, And we won"t reach the goal of full sanctification (sinless perfection) in this life. The debate over same sex marriage is not fundamentally a disagreement about who can get married, But about what marriage is. Is marriage an arbitrary custom that people invented, One which they can define however they please? Or is marriage an institution established by God, Well-matched to His design of human beings? The reason, Then, That the Bible opposes the homosexual lifestyle is that it violates God"s design for marriage and family. Two people of the same gender do not complement one another as husband and wife do. Their union cannot produce children. And homosexual activity is harmful and destructive to oneself and others. So there are good reasons why the Bible explicitly condemns homosexual relationships. If we abandon the Bible"s teaching on marriage and just make up new definitions as we go, Then why couldn"t marriage be redefined in other ways? Why couldn't it be more than two people, For example? Why couldn't it be a temporary rather than a lifelong commitment? There"s a logical slippery slope from same sex marriage to polygamy, Temporary marriages, And other corrupt practices, Because the same wrong thinking underlies these ideas"that people rather than the Creator have the authority to decide what marriage is. Sadly, Once the definition of marriage is separated from the Creator"s design, It becomes so flexible that it begins to lose any significant meaning. Indeed, Many homosexual activists have admitted that their real goal is to destroy the institution of marriage altogether. They realize that championing same-sex marriage works toward undermining the norms of marriage (like monogamy, Permanence and exclusivity) and ultimately even the very concept of marriage itself. But healthy societies are built on healthy families. The more we move away from the biblical teaching on marriage, The more we"ll have broken homes, Because other arrangements simply do not work as well as God"s design. Logic indicates that the undermining of marriage will lead to an increase in cohabitation, Divorce, Single parenting, Abortion, Etc. , And various studies help to confirm this. The weakening of marriage will place a burden on society as a whole, Because others will have to step in with time, Energy, And money to try to repair the damage. They will have to minister to hurting adults and help to raise the children of broken homes, And those children will be more likely to get into trouble, Causing further problems. This leads to my next point. What"s wrong with same-sex couples producing children through a surrogate or adopting children? The fact that many children require adoption means they are already in a less-than-ideal situation. The ideal is that children would be raised by their own parents. Children long for and tend to be healthier when raised by their biological mother and father. The next best thing, Though, Would be for children to be raised by a married, Opposite-sex couple, As opposed to a single parent or a same-sex couple. Adoption by a same-sex couple would give children additional difficulties to overcome instead of giving them the best chance for success. This is because same-sex parenting would deny children the ability to have a parent of each gender (both a mom and a dad). This isn"t good, Because men and women parent differently. They bring different strengths and weaknesses to the table, So children learn different lessons from mom than they do from dad, And vice versa. If a same-sex couple brought children into the world through a surrogate, That would be even worse, Because they would be creating children with the intention up front of separating them from at least one of their biological parents. Studies show that children do better if they are raised by their actual parents rather than one parent and one step parent, But same-sex parenting necessarily involves a step parent. In fact, Numerous testimonies from people who spent their childhood in a same sex household bear out these truths. For example, Heather Barwick was raised by her mother and her mother's lesbian partner. Although Heather loves them both dearly, She writes about how the lack of a father in her home negatively affected her. She says, "My father"s absence created a huge hole in me, And I ached every day for a dad. I loved my mom"s partner, But another mom could never have replaced the father I lost" (Truth Overruled, 2015, P. 170). According to the champions of same-sex marriage, Though, Two parents of the same gender should be just as good as having one"s own mother and father. This simply isn"t true. Advocates of same-sex marriage are primarily concerned about the desires of adults, But they largely ignore the fact that, In the process, They trample on the best interests of children. It should not be surprising that, Once gay marriage is declared legal, Those who oppose it are seen as enemies of the law. This is why, Especially since the US Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage, Those with moral and religious objections to same-sex marriage are increasingly being persecuted for simply following their deeply held religious convictions. See Gay Marriage"a big stick to beat the church with. Religious adoption agencies are being forced to close if they will not place children into same-sex households. Christian schools are being threatened with loss of funding and accreditation if they do not allow their students to actively engage in homosexual practices. Professionals in the wedding industry and even pizza shops are being forced to participate in same-sex ceremonies, Or face financial ruin. Even individuals like former Atlanta Fire Chief Kelvin Cochran and former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich are being hounded out of their careers for simply opposing gay marriage in their private lives. Kim Davis was sent to jail because her convictions would not allow her to sign a same-sex marriage license. And we"ve only seen the beginning of this tidal wave. All of the transgender lunacy we"re now facing is a result of this moral revolution as well.