PROOF that theoretical mathematics and physics are WRONG!!! I separate mathematics into three types:

OpeningMy opponent is claiming that he can prove both theoretical mathematics and physics are wrong. This is obviously a bold claim, and I sincerely hope my opponent can win this debate so we can usher in a new age of correct mathematics and physics. It would be the finding of the century. Burden of proof is obviously on Pro, but I am sure he will be able to fulfill this burden. For this opening, I will simply lay out the groundwork of physics and 'theoretical mathematics'. Being a layman myself, please excuse my lack of sophistication and understanding on such a complex topic, I will only go over the basics of what my opponent has to disprove.Theoretical Mathematics While my opponent has outlined what 'Theomathematics' and 'Real-world mathematics' are, he has yet to explain 'Theoretical mathematics', other than claiming that "it is what the liberal EVILutionists try to force on us. It is a tool of SATAN.' Now, this is an incredibly strong claim. My opponent will first have to prove that 'Satan' definitely exists, and that evoltuionists are evil, which I am sure he will be able to do. Moving on to the definition.Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I can tell, 'Theoretical mathematics' seems to be the same as 'Pure mathematics', as per Google. Now, Pure Mathematics is the study of abstract concepts, and was the basis of many things; physics, astronomy, engineering, etc.[1] What this means, in fact, is that 'Pure mathematics/Theoretical mathematics' does not consist solely of a set of definitive laws, but rather, is simply a branch of Mathematics responsible for the derivation of theories. In order for my opponent to meet his burden of proof, he will therefore have to disprove every single theory in Pure mathematics. Physics Physics is incredibly complex and responsible for a large number of physical discoveries and applications, including the way cars move, gravity, and the nuclear bomb. It would be a monumental discovery if my opponent was able to disprove the entire branch of physics (which is what he is trying to do as per resolution). There are numerous theories that my opponent has to disprove, as many of these theories are independent of each other. However, for starters, I simply challenge my opponent to disprove Einstein's theory of relativity, the big bang, and quantum chemistry.My opponent's argumentMy opponent says that if there is just 'one flaw', then it is proven incorrect. He has done his research guys - he is indeed correct! However, this is only true for one specific theory or idea; it does not extend to the entire branch of Mathematics/Physics. Having said that, I am having trouble understanding his infinite converging diverging sequence of numbers. I ask you to excuse my ignorance in this matter, but which specific theory does your converging diverging sequence disprove? And what about the other thousands of theories? In summation, I wish my opponent luck in his endeavours and urge him to continue his research on our quest to discover a new turning point of modern maths and physics. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...;