God exists

To clarify, We are debating the concept of God (ie. An intelligent designer). "This is exactly how you would expect things to look if Unicorns, And God, Did not exist" But if there is no God, Then how do you explain the fact that this universe even exists? How would we have such a universe, One that we can rely on our logic and reasoning? Evidence shows that the universe is not infinitely old and that there was a point in time when it was created. How would it have been created without a Creator? The only two possibilities are that there is a Being that created it, Or that no one created it. Considering how many variables in our universe have to be fine-tuned to support life, It is much more probable that it has been created by a highly intelligent Being. 1. Every design has a designer. 2. The universe has a very complex design. 3. Therefore, The universe has a Designer. When you see an airplane, You don't think that it was a product from an explosion at an airplane factory. You dismiss that possibility because it is not reasonable. "No one can disprove or prove God exists, " but you can look at the evidence and show that He exists beyond a reasonable doubt. You can see evidence of His existence by the results of His works, Like the creation of the universe. The universe is very fine-tuned for us to be here right now. For example, If the law of gravity varied even slightly the universe would not be habitable for life. In relation to the other forces of nature, Gravity must be fine-tuned to 1 in 10^40. Another example is, As physicist Stephen Hawking said, "If the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million, The universe would have re collapsed before it even reached its present size". There are actually 19 such universal constants that must each be perfectly fine-tuned. In fact, Oxford physicist Paul Davies concluded that if we jointly considered all the laws of nature that must be fine-tuned, We would be unable to write down such a large number, Since the necessary digits would be greater than the number of elementary particles in the universe. There are two options, Either God created such a fine-tuned universe for us, Or it all happened by blind chance. It is much more logical to believe that there was an intelligent Creator behind it, Then dumb chance. It takes much more faith to believe that chance created this universe then an intelligent Creator. Another argument for a Creator is the question of where life first began. Either there is a God who created life, Or there is no God, Therefore life just occurred from non-life. There is zero evidence that life can come out of non-life. There is no atheist that can claim that they know where life came from. Knowing what we know, The only reasonable and logical conclusion is that there was an intelligent Designer who created life. Non-life cannot create life. Life is so extremely complex that if we were to write out all the DNA (ATCG) of the "primitive amoeba" as Richard Dawkins calls it, It would fill up 1000 encyclopedias. It is true that we should not assume that God is responsible for everything that we cannot explain, But with the creation of the universe, The naturalistic options cannot explain it. I will say it again, There is no evidence that life can come from non-life. Even if it could, The precision with which chemicals must be mixed together could not come from pure chance. That leaves us with the option that there is an intelligent Creator that created such complex creations. You can argue that if you give it more time, You can eventually get the right combination of chemicals to create life. But the second law of thermodynamics says that, Basically, With more time, Nature creates chaos, Not the order needed to create life, Therefore making the chance of attaining the order needed for life even lower. And the chance of this occurring is so low it is virtually zero. That is why I believe that it takes more faith to be an atheist than to believe there is a God. The atheist needs to explain away this evidence that I have presented while not having enough evidence to hold his stand. He needs much more faith, To fill the holes in his view where there is no evidence to support it.