Both letters from "Disgusted White Girl" and "Black Royalty" are racist and/or misinformed.

A comment in the comment section wrongfully claims that my purpose in this debate seems to be allowing theLwerd to keep elaborating on all of her points, while I lay back and not put up much of a fight. This is not so. For I would rather keep my debate tactic simple and that is to only have one goal in mind. I aim to persuade voters to see a different side to these obviously racist letters. DWG's initial letter to Sister2Sister did contain some racist remarks as my opponent has pointed out. However none of these racist ideas came from her but rather her black boyfriend. This brings two arguments to mind. One, when will we see the day that black people are held to the same white person standard, and stop making comments that hurt their own so-called brothers and sisters? This contradiction is evident in society, as rappers run around using the N word in every sentence, yet it is almost criminal if white people use the same term. Obviously there is a double standard. And maybe what theLwerd and everybody else should consider is the fact that the racist comments in DWGs letter were not her own words. They were taken out of context. This brings me to my next point. Accountability. Why are we holding DWG responsible for quotes that came directly from her boyfriend? I feel that DWGs comments, although inarguably racist, were just recited in the form of an inquisition to a black magazine. DWG knew that she would get some heated responses. Why else would she bash black people in a magazine geared towards a black audience? Even if you do not agree that her intentions were sincere (asking legitimate questions), you still can not blame her for those remarks since she quoted them as coming from her boyfriend. How many times do people quote other sources on debate.org? The purpose is to include the opinion of another person to support your claim. We do it all the time. Yet you want to punish DWG for doing the same. Whether or not you agree with her, you cannot hold those words against her. That is my final say as far as DWG. In terms of Black Royalty, you posed the question that was reiterated in the comment section about your quest to find out why his letter was so celebrated in the black community. I believe I have already responded to this in the first round. My argument is that he twisted facts to misrepresent black culture vs. white culture in history. Though none of what he said was untrue. For instance, Queen Hatesput DID rule over tribes in Egypt. Black women DID teach white women how to season and preserve food. Black women DID watch their husbands get beaten and thrown in jail during the Civil Rights Movement. So although your insight into the situation was correct, e.g. reminding us that white people have also made adequate contributions to society and undergone similar hardship, it doesn't take away from BRs points that black people have too. Thus taking away from your argument that his letter was misinformed. And as far as racist goes, I didn't see any of that. Sure BR talks about his preference of black women over white women and why, but we can't call him racist for being honest about his opinion.