Democracy is not real or the best form of government!

I would start my rebuttal with a question. What are the alternatives? Democracy is where a nation is governed by the people. If not Democracy, then what else? Yes, some people will be angry because their favoring voting side lost, however, to be fair, the majority did win. But what if that system were to be gone? A long time ago, where Monarchy were to be the most dominant way of governing the people. Monarchs told people what to do and most of the time, against the people's own free will. People would be massacred and executed for defiance alone. Or for some cases, for no reason at all, all under the orders of the Monarchs. The people would have no say in a society ran by Monarchy. What about Communism? No, the actual kind of Communism. Course, what you might be thinking of is Stalinism and or Putinism. No, actual Communism at it's basic core is a nation ran by the people without a class system. Meaning that there's an absence of money and ownership to establish social order. It's all ran by the people, without greed nor corruption. However, that can't be established since we humans are unpredictable and probably evil by nature. I mean, have you went on 4chan recently?! That place is human nature at it's finest! I could be exaggerating a bit there, however, my point stays. What about a Theocracy? A perfect Theocratic nation would need heavy censoring of all outside influences, must be heavily isolated from other nations, and must be insanely strict to the point of slavery and servitude, so their way of belief and faith remains pure. Kinda like a dictatorship, except more religion involved. However, with intense isolation and strict rules follows a technological slow down. The perfect Theocracy nation would be technologically inferior compared to other nations. Unless, their religion is based around improving technology and inventing things, then, okay, that would be interesting than all hells combined. I mean, that would be cool to see. Besides that, no. What about a Technocracy? It's ran by elite professionals that specializes in a certain area, such as engineering, or military, or Health, or history, or education, or science, or pretty much anyone that the nation needs helped by. Instead of a nation ran by people, it's ran by skilled, educated, professional elites. It sounds good on paper, but it's kinda situational. For example, while some who is extremely skilled and educated in technology, but has no idea how the economy works, therefore may unintentionally ruin their nation by trying to create, oh I don't know, a giant robot? Or how some Technocrats would rather build more hospitals than fix the roads, or focuses more on fixing the roads than education budgets. Of course, a Technocrat can potentially be educated and skilled in all fields. It's unlikely since the human brain can only remember and learn so many things before forgetting. But, not impossible. Except not all fields are perfect, and there's more things that can be improved or modified on certain fields, like economics with the fiscal policy or the advancing of technologies. In short, a Technocracy is good for situational purposes. Now back to your argument; Democracy is not real or the best form of government! Well, let's discuss Democracy. We're of course, discussing Democracy that's made for America by it's founding fathers. Do note that the constitution were appropriate at the time, for example, the second amendment is really okay for that time era. Where before they got their independence from the Brits, AKA, Redcoats, AKA England, it was a lawless place, where all men were to defend themselves and forge law and order to a place that was ruled by untamed wilderness and the unknowns. America's Democracy was suppose to make the government's powers as limited as possible, and even goes as far as setting up three branches of legislature, which in my interpretation, are constantly at each others' necks. Insuring the States have the power to govern its people. Unless, the States break a rule, in which the Government will intervene. Honestly, the States kinda have more power over America's people than the government itself, my opinion of course. At it's core, Democracy is a system of government ran by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. Basically, all the people of America votes, all people of a state vote for a person that can vote on the behalf or the majority of said state in which will vote, all votes will get into the appropriate legislatures, in which will pass the final verdict. At Least that way, people have some power over the fate of their own nation. So to answer your argument, Democracy is the best form of government America can have.