Marxist methods of teaching and Marxist ideologies should be implemented in school curricula

To first address the situation of the argument, pertaining to the merits of Marxist methods of teaching in our school system. My intention is to implement teaching styles of Paulo Freire(. http://www.marxists.org...) or any other Marxist-oriented teaching (meaning the de-centralization of education towards certain classes (Reference: Jean Anyon's article of the Hidden Agenda of Education, any who are reading this should read this article) ). The type of education that digresses from the typical "Banking Concept of Education" (Pedagogy of the Oppressed) and focuses more on the Problem Posing type of education in which the teacher and students are equal in that they both teach and learn equally. Mere memorization and regurgitation of thrown out, and instead the education brought in assumes this order of, 1. Teacher's stimuli to the 'student' in which they obtain information and process it. 2. The 'student' takes this information and analyzes it and compares it with their knowledge of the subject at the time and logically and assertively creates a new 'understanding' of the subject 3. The 'student' then converses and argues with the teacher of both of their understandings. 4. A possible new consensus or continuation of disagreement occurs. 5. The new understanding is applied to their lives and methods of understanding in any manner, by de-compartmentalizing (contrary to the regimented education where, and I know this personally, as I am still in school, students gain information and hinder it by compartmentalizing it into ONLY the specified subject and willfully ignoring any possibility of applying it to any other 'subject'. This method would allow students to use the information they have attained to contribute to society in the best way that they can. And with their choice of occupation that would contribute to society, their choice would be based not off of what comforts they have dreamed of possessing but based on what they see as important and what they can excel in the most proficiently. Their choice will not determine the monetary and societal class manner they will live in; this should never be the case. The teachings of Capitalism only lead students to learn how to undermine others in our society through the 'dog eat dog' world people have created and still wish to sustain since they are the ones who have excelled in it and wish for no others to attain their level of prosperity, and if someone were too, that individual would just become another gear for the machine that is the continuation of the present condition that is Capitalism. No, I am not saying all 'wealthy' people are evil or any stereotype of that sort, I am simply making an observation and judgement. Implementing this method, if it were the desired method by a majority (conditioned by the type of 'government' we live in), could be attained by abolishing such administrations as the US Department of Education (which Ron Paul is wishing to do, and also destroy the Federal Reserve, but that deals more with the crippling of our fascist capitalistic form of monetary distribution, and this is another matter to be discussed, I apologize for the digression), and focus on private school, which could mean the abolishing of general, regimented, education system and more of a simple, open ended school system. This type of education is very similar to the form that could be found in Germany. In Germany though, parents are forced to intervene in their child's education, which I believe to be the most important factor, as they control a child's willingness to learn and ascend in levels of education; they are bound to do this by law, but I believe that through informing parents on how important their role is in their child's learning is, we can, together, improve this countries education to a level never seen before. Now to address my opponents assertion that communism, as a societal ideology, is impossible. First, if there is any confusion, I do not expect any change of the magnitude to occur over night. But, over a long and education filled time period, I do believe it to happen, inevitably. Just look at how feudalism was overtaken by capitalism and a free market; which Marx believes will happen from Capitalism to Socialism, a lesser form of Communism where a government actually exist, but both socialism and communism are mis understood, but that's another matter. From Socialism comes the rise of the Vanguard of the Proletariat who assumes control to implemented Communism, this is a Dictatorship, but not the one that most people think (i. e. Stalin). If the Vanguard truly was a believer in the final step of Marx's ladder, they would relinquish control after everything has been 'arranged', which is a step all attempts at Communisms have stopped, simply because of the facade that was the ascension to Communism. After Communism, Marx believes another step will occur, but this is unable to be predicted. Most people think that Marx's predictions of Capitalistic societies has been wrong, but things change, they always do, history does always have to repeat itself is we can learn from mistakes. Now, on my opponent's assertion that Communism requires 100% of the population to agree to the 'terms'. This is simply wrong; there is no need for 100% agreement, as this is close to impossible (but I do not eliminate the impossibility, because the 'impossible' has been rewritten all through history). Certain areas in the globe could contain contained but open Communistic societies that welcome any who wish to include themselves, and unless a world policing 'democracy' wishing to 'free' the 'enslaved' people, these small societies could exist. Man is, by nature, a loving creature that does not contain the behavioral attributes many consider to be inherent. That is not to say in the least that man is perfect, but to think we by nature are greedy is, in my opinion, too pessimistic. Even if all of the hatred, greed, subservience,hostility, and lust is in our nature, anyone can through their own personal will control any of these emotions to contribute to the well being of our society. I await my opponents response, and thank him for participating in this debate, as it is very exhilarating and educational to me, and I hope, him.