Star Trek vs Star Wars (Ultimate Nerd Showdown)

So I just wrote a huge response, and then my computer ate it. I'm not doing it again. So here is the incredibly short version with added sass because its 12:45 am and I am so mad that this all deleted I can't see straight. 1.1- Sputnik lasted for 3 months and launched an American space program that persists to this day. You can't measure something's impact merely by the time it was present (Jesus was only around for 3 years too, coincidence, I think not). 1.2- Star Trek took its original characters to depths Star Wars couldn't accomplish even if its audience did have an adult attention span. Trek's original cast appears in 10 feature length films, and 79 original episodes, for a total of 68 continuous cut and edited hours of story. Trust me, the writers explored. Then moved on to a whole new cast, and made that into a whole new success. Accomplished an entertainment feat never duplicated. How many movies were the original characters of Star Wars in again? 3? 1.3- Before my internet ruined my original response, I had dedicated like 8 paragraphs to making fun of you here. But now I am too tired, and all my wit is gone, so here it goes: Youre stupid. I win. Shut up. [Cmon Wrath, try harder.] Ok, listen. I originally said that the Trek reboot was awesome. You said it wasn't because they used time travel which deleted the old story. I corrected you and said it was an alternate universe. You said alternate univereses were weak. I corrected you again noting that other Sci-Fi's have done it too, including Marvel. You were at this point abducted by aliens and replaced with a drone who didn't understand what the line of argument was, so your new alien host argued that D.C. Comics is better than Marvel. After I got my eyes back in my head from how random this come back was, I responded by noting that nobody cares and that doesn't matter. Your latest argument for how awesome DC Comics is really only leaves me to wonder when the Alien is going to go away. Because he's a stupid face and I hate him. 1.4- If art by your standard has to mean drawings then so be it. Star Trek had an animated series too. There ya go. I still think Trek has more artistic depth in its story and its plot and its themes. 1.5- 11 Feature length films. 726 episodes. 30 years. Suck it. 2.1- Star Trek is more realistic, FTW. 2.1.1- That's really cool that you know the entire Star Wars history. It's also really irrelevant to my point. Star War's is an inconsistent pile of poo written to entertain and not interact with a discerning mind. So Obi Wan uses absolutes when he decries them. And no you can't pull the ole Star Wars standby and go running to the force to explain everything. It's just bad writing. 3.1- You know what else impacts the psyche's of little kids? You, ya stinking pedofile. Star Trek wins because it only hits on viewers who are 18+, or something like that I don't know I'm tired. 1.1- No it's not. 2.1- Yes you did. 3.1- You didn't talk about Boba either. At least 7 of 9 is easy on the eyes. 3.2- "Isn't a parsec a unit of distance, not time?" -Chris Griffin The enterprise would swat the falcon like a fly. It's not even David vs. Goliath. Its David vs a STATE OF THE ART SPACESHIP CITY WITH ENOUGH GUNS AND AMMO AND TECHNOLOGY TO BLOW YOUR WOOKIE BRAINS OUT.. Vote for the Pro, because Star Trek is superior. You can still like Star Wars if that's your personal favorite, but by all measurements in our debate, Star Trek is better. Even though I phoned this round in, I think I put up enough of a show in the other rounds to more than make up for this. And, my smart-mouthed, snarky, short answer style in this round is pithy and sarcastic and other synonyms I found in my thesaurus for witty. So I win because you like reading my parts of the debate more. And you know it. Live long and prosper. Or don't, I don't care.