Romans 3:7 and 2cor 11:5,10.fundamentally show everything that is wrong with Pauline Christianity

Romans 3:7 World English Bible For if the truth of God through my lie abounded to his glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner? New International Version Someone might argue, "If my falsehood enhances God's truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?" Does God need man to be glorious? What about the endless eternity in which man did not exist but God existed? Was God not glorious then and only attained glory through the creation of man? How can a man claim that God needs a lie to enhance his glory? Glory is defined as "high renown or honor won by notable achievements" and this by the way is a definition that is befitting man not God, for truly God is above such a definition that itself has limitations. The claim made by Paul is tantamount to saying that If you tell a lie about God and people believe that lie, then you are doing something good because that lie is asking them to do something good, Praise be to God beyond such an evident impurity. Would you lie about your father to make people follow him, isn't this the definition of a sinner? Yet then, how can one lie about God and demand respect on account of that lie? God is not in need of man's lies and if man's belief in God or obedience increased God's glory, then by all account no man would disbelieve or disobey him, it is events like death which was can arguably say are God's will because no man has a say in that matter whether righteous or a liar, for death is the common lot, so would be things that increase God's glory if his glory could be increased even by a straw's weight by man. From the beginning of time until the time of Saul/Paul are we claiming that men who stood by the truth failed God and it was this lie that increased his glory? Yet Jesus in his life time never told any man that he would increase God's glory nor did he condone lies. it is the teaching of Paul that have stained his version of Christianity with this arrogant preposition. How many men of " faith" have given lie to the truth with the mindset similar to this? It has been seen in history numerous times, Pope Urban II launching the crusades and claiming that God wills it, and continuing to absolve men of sin to raise money for this war effort, in the modern age, he would be called a war criminal. But to reach such a level of boldness, One needs scriptural proof....in this case, Romans 3:7 , if by my lie that God wills it, we are able to rule the Holy land, why am I condemned a war criminal? Are we to believe that if man does not obey God, his glory shall diminish? There is no proof of this in scripture another example of how arrogant men have become that they claim to subject there creator to there desires! A lie is a lie, if we believe that God condones lies, then we can arguably say that scripture could also be one big lie, and God is above such things. Rather it is man who has the audacity to kill others without right and has the audacity to oppress and claim himself a prophet of God that would see no problem with lying about God. If God needs man to enhance his glory, does this not mean that God is not self sufficient? World English Bible For I reckon that I am not at all behind the very best apostles. New International Version I do not think I am in the least inferior to those "super-apostles." Did God reveal to Paul by an angel or vision that he was at the same level as the apostles of Jesus? For a man to reckon himself and as such take the power of judgment into his hands, is if anything indicative of a false sense of arrogance. How can a sinner , (by the fact that he was proudly oppressing the followers of Jesus , then one day reformed) claim that he was at the same level as the apostles whose feet Jesus washed, who loved and supported Jesus while they were alive , to whom a last supper was given? The notion that somehow a stranger who came after Jesus and never met him in person could have a similar rank as the apostles is ridiculous as this would mean that any human being would make a similar claim, and how many have made such claims! False prophets who all claim sanctity, but I contend that had it not been for Paul's liberal play on scripture, such false gods and prophets may not have been so prevalent . what is to stop one man from making similar claims? on one hand a man claims that his lies make God greater and on the other he claims that he is not inferior to those that God chose to be in the company of Jesus. Is this not the pattern we have seen repeating in history with various variations? Hitler said, "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.", and like sheep many follow him to this day. God is not a man that he should lie, God is not weak that he should depend on man, God is not helpless that he is need. If Paul was the apostle to the gentiles, why would God sent to them a man that took pride in lying about God and yet to the non gentiles he sent to them men who were not liars? When has God ever lied to man? Indeed it is man who is a persistent liar. Jesus, the truthful said John 5:43 New International Version I have come in my Father's name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him. New International Version You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.