Creation v.s. Evolution

I couldn't find who came up with the theory The earliest and most direct observational evidence of the validity of the theory is the expansion of the universe according to Hubble's law (as indicated by the redshifts of galaxies), discovery and measurement of the cosmic microwave background and the relative abundances of light elements produced by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. More recent evidence includes observations of galaxy formation and evolution and the distribution of large-scale cosmic structures, These are sometimes called the "four pillars" of the Big Bang theory. Precise modern models of the Big Bang appeal to various exotic physical phenomena that have not been observed in terrestrial laboratory experiments or incorporated into the Standard Model of particle physics. Of these features, dark matter is currently subjected to the most active laboratory investigations. Remaining issues include the cuspy halo problem and the dwarf galaxy problem of cold dark matter. Dark energy is also an area of intense interest for scientists, but it is not clear whether direct detection of dark energy will be possible. Inflation and baryogenesis remain more speculative features of current Big Bang models. Viable, quantitative explanations for such phenomena are still being sought. These are currently unsolved problems in physics. (stole that from Wikipedia) it would indeed be valid to say that there is a coincidence between "the big bang" and "in the beginning". thanks for not using the analogy. for high scale mutations(like the fallout series) they would have to be exposed to enough radiation to alter your DNA, but not high enough to kill you(deathclaws are highly unlikely), for small scale, like with the "letuv" it is (simply put) just slight variations(think skin color in humans) continuing. Macroevolution(I may be wrong) is just microevolution, but continued so far, that a new species is made, for instance, if humans were to interfere with the letuv's habitat(slightly at first, but continuing), they would have to allow for some different areas, but in order to survive, adaptation needs to happen, so instead having talons to survive in trees, they start developing something similar to legs. Also, by plenty of food, I meant that they had a high food source(bugs or something). natural selection is (sorry) "survival of the fittest" at it's finest. because of the name, it may sound like nature selects things to live and die, but that's not the case, I'm going to bring in something that happened a long time ago. So almost all moths are white now, we can agree on that. and this helped a lot because birch trees made it to where predators could barely see the white ones, however, the black ones died a lot(the dominant was white while the recessive was black, due to this, we will never not have black moths), but as the industrial revolution rolled in, smoke was released into the air, making the birch trees black, this made the white moths die more, while the black moths survived(they blended in). this caused a switch(it reverted again later) if you are referring to the big bang, are most likely theory is that all matter was everywhere, it just hadn't formed yet, but then BOOM, the big bang happens and all of the matter began to form(over millions of years). with the reproductive topic, sperm is alive, and the egg is like an incubation chamber, it provides food, heat, water, and all the other essentials, while the sperm becomes a baby. You don't appear ignorant, because you want to learn, if you were ignorant you would have no need to learn because you wouldn't want to, questions are the only way to do that. If anything, I respect you more now. thanks for taking the time to read this