Liberals are winning the gun debate

You are indeed welcome. As to tired old argument? Quite the contrary, ONLY my argument is of any rational and responsible standard. While yours is clearly made in haste and completely without forethought and mature reflection. Not to mention biased in the extreme!Let Logic demonstrate:Undeniable facts ... as·sault ri·fle noun noun: assault rifle; plural noun: assault rifles a rapid-fire, magazine-fed automatic rifle designed for infantry use. 1. Assault Weapons are made for Mass Killing, during times of War or conflict! for no other reason are they produced. 2. Bullets are what is fired from all weapons of hunting professionals ... none of which requires multiple Kill capability, as kill limitations are in effect and single digit kills. Thus mass killing is forbidden on ALL GAME ANIMALS!3. Fowls hunting does not utilize Bullet engagement, negating use of assault rifles for game fowls. 4, Caliber size prevents its use on small game, except the morbid pastime of exploding the small pray, which is decadence not hunting!5. assault weapons for use on target shooting is not a right as previously stated. The inference being because it was not stated would also hold true on the ownership of Tanks, Helicopters, Machine Guns, Claymore mines, Tow missle defenses, RPG's and the like. Any one of which can be argued under YOUR irresponsible beliefs.The facts remain valid. Your ENTIRE argument is based on an absurd inferrence and a fabrication of the mind! It is the responsibility of sound mines of the Government to curtail such fanatism, while it remains manageable.There can be no defense that the founding fathers seriously wished to allow weapons for mass killings in the hands of the common Man. Any attempt to argue oherwise is irrational and completely indefensible under the standards of common sense and decency!Thus we have two opinions ... each approaching the matter from a certain viewpoint. But ONLY MINE is even in the remote area of intelligent consideration. No offense meant, your argument simply has no real basis in reality!By your view Civilian people by LEGAL RIGHT may own ANY WEAPON OF MASS KILLING IN any shape or form! This is OBVIOUSLY WRONG!Under no paradigm could anyone of maturity and reasonable reflection come to so disasterous conclusion as you have come to! You simply cannot defend your take on the second Amendment and you know this.Oh you would LIKE for it to be true. But NO ONE and I mean NO ONE in their right mind would seriously subscribe to your viewpoint!A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.This speaks of Militia not sports! the right to bear arms ... DOES NOT AND CANNOT INFER TANKS, MINES, TANKS AND ASSAULT WEAPONS OF MASS KILLING. TELL me YOUR NOT READING INTO THIS STATEMENT! No civilians OWNED CANON's even in THEIR TIME! so please, we may have been born at night, BUT we were not born LAST NIGHT! There can be NO argument .... NO civilians WERE ALLOWED in the whole of History to possess CANON'S for home defense OR recreation EVER!CASE CLOSED ... you lose! or can you show home ownership of canons for home defense and sports events in our history? cause Unless you can ... and we all know you can't YOUR argument has BEEN PROVEN WRONG, By the Founding fathers themselves. Remember not companies, militias, business concerns I mean common folk. Regular people!Can you? Can you show this evidence? This WAS during the time of the writing of the declaration of independence? So SHOW us where common folk were ALLOWED to purchase and keep Canon's at home ... which were available at the time of it's writing? HOME DEFENSE, like your excuse for it now is.