God is a harmful concept to human advancement.

Buddhism does not acknowledge a God. Brenham is not a God, it’s more of an energy. Calling Brenham religious is like calling evolution a religion… Wait... huh??? Yeah. And a spiritual world does not mean that a God resides there, it’s more like an alternate dimension. I think Jainism do believe in a spiritual world, but deny a higher spiritual being. 1 The book is not flawed. If it is put inside a book and given to a religion, you can observe and test the morality out with the religious followers who practice the morality. The morality in the bible is workable, and has served the religion well for thousands of years. Keep in mind, it’s perfectly logical to rape someone. If you’re in the mood to have sex, there’s plenty of women around. For a rapist does what is right in his own eyes. If morality is subjective, then all evil can be right and all good can be wrong… So the question is how workable a morality is. 2 Because a theist morality has the capacity to withstand change. It can be written in stone, such as the ten commandments. Can you give me an example? 3 Because I think the burning sulfur is their own immorality. Jesus is notorious for using non-literal language. (Matt 16:6) Granted this is my own interpretation. Not everyone would agree with me. 4 Yes, Yes, & yes. Truth hurts sometimes. And the Isaac example was a test for Abrahams loyalty to God, Isaac didn’t die. 5 But God hasn’t forbidden sex. Its alright to have sex with the wife you love. Gays can enjoy strait sex too. 6 I typically lean toward the Galileo torture account a myth, I think the account was more about science vs science, like what the church should accept as science. See http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu... 7 Hmm, debatable. Some slaves did like their master enough that they wanted to serve them forever (Deut 15:16-17) Also, slaves could run away, and you weren’t allowed to return him to his master. (Deut 23:15-16) Also Christians are technically slaves because they serve a master without pay, and many do want to be a Christian. I find no evil if you wish to serve a master. See Page 172: http://bit.ly... 8 You do know you hear evidence for evolution as a child, and you have to be taught it for you don’t naturally know it. A child does not look at fossils and immediately think “hey they evolved!” you have to be taught its conclusions. Your reasoning is flawed because you also accept evolution conclusion, despite it not being empirical Science (no one has observed one life-form evolve into a higher life-form). Everything can be explained away from a common creator as opposed to a common ancestor. 9 Oh, then it is neither reasonable nor logical, because it contradicts. Is this logical? 2+2=5? No because it contradicts. Likewise, science does technically contradict. Though not to say all science is bad, some is. Yep. Another person told me. 10 I agree with the religion part. But you’re distinguishing science and religion as different. They have been known to mix, such as creationism and ID. To me science is just religion dressed in a lab coat. You might say religion isn’t science, but it’s all subjective. 11 Well if HIV infection decrease is true, then perhaps because of that. And I don’t think a whole lot of boys think about it much, honestly I think my penis is sexier than an uncircumcised. Are you circumcised? 12 E} We don’t want him. We just want to do what we want to do and reject him. Some fools do hate him and would prefer an unjust judge, it’s stupid. 13 Not sure. Prayer supposedly helps, but it’s difficult to prove. 14 “Love the lord your God”, for this is right to love your maker. For if God did exist, then this is impossible for an atheist. 15 Belief in God. It’s an abomination to an atheist. 16 He didn’t create homosexuals. Gays created themselves. They don’t have to be gay you know, they can go straight whenever they feel like it. 17 He didn’t. He created man, and man ruined themselves. 18 If you are a Christian and a woman, you are logically a disciple. 19 Various disagreements on various topics. But I don’t think a little bit of different faith means that your unsaved, for Abraham the father of Jews, lacked the new testament (his faith was a different color), but I believe he was saved. All servants have a little bit different perception of their master, it doesn’t mean the master can’t exist. Also a master has been known to give a little bit different instructions to his servants for different functions, one to sow another to reap. 20 Because people disagree with each other, and they wish to serve another Lord then mine. For if a man wishes to serve another master, should he be denied?