Walt Disney has been preserved via Cryonic Preservation (and will be thawed in the near future)

Thank you con, I will now present said arguments.I propose that Walt Disney, the man behind Mickey Mouse and Disneyland, has been cryonically preserved and will be thawed in the near future.1. What cryonic preservation is, and why it works:Cryonic preservation is the science of freezing the human body after a process of vitrification with the intent to revivify the patient many years into the future. A short video demonstrating this process is shown by futurist Morgan Freeman here: As you can see, cryonic preservation appears to be a plausible answer to the problem of death, which we as humans have struggled with for the entirety of our existance; even now, Google Calico is a newly created organization which seeks to end aging itself. But does cryonic preservation work? The simple answer - yes.My proof of my assertion rests on accounts of a frozen state causing the slowing/halt of death, and the capability of medical technology to resuscitate these frozen subjects "back to life".In the medical community, it is already known that a patient may be 'dead' for minutes of time before the patient is definitively dead. However, one story of a japanese woman who attempted suicide by walking at night in a forest who overdosed on pills extended the commonly held notion of minutes to hours. Ten hours total, in fact - and all because of the freezing temperature of the forest which she was walking in. The woman's body temperature upon discovery after four hours: 20 degrees celcius[1], which, according to a simple google search, is the equivalent of 68 degrees farenheit. Far from the freezing temperatures of cryonic preservation, and yet still capable of saving a life.So how long could someone be preserved in freezing temperatures? Believe it or not, but scientists were capable of reviving a prehistoric virus which had laid frozen in ice for approximately 30,000 years, even without the precautions taken by modern cryobiologists through the process of vitrification in order to preserve the organs of the human body.[2] Recall that a virus is a cell, and that the human body is composed of millions, trillions, billions of cells. If even one cell can be preserved for possibly 30,000 years (and possibly even more), then imagine how long the cells composing the human body could be preserved. A similar result is happening now. Scientists are now using frozen, extracted cell nuclei preserved from the 1970's in order to bring back a prehistoric frog that has long been extinct. Their progress so far has resulted in the revivication of the frogs genomes and the production of embryos containing the frog's DNA.[3]Cryonic preservation is real, and in light of the evidence, its legitimacy cannot be denied.2. What this has to with Walt Disney:One might ask, "but what does this have to do with Walt Disney?". My answer: everything. Marc Eliot, the New York Times bestselling author, writes in his award winning biography Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince, "Disney's growing preoccupation with his own mortality also led him to explore the science of cryogenics, the freezing of an aging or ill person until such time as the human body can be revived and restored to health. Disney often mused to Roy about the notion of perhaps having himself frozen, an idea which received . . . indulgent nods from his brother . . ."(quote excerpt of Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince, by Marc Eliot) Marc Eliot was not the only well-known writer to record Walt's interest in cryopreservation. Leonard Mosley - historian, journalist, biographer, novelist, and the author of a plethora of works [4] - was the author of the book Disney's World, in which he also records Walt's desire to be preserved in a cryonic state:"[T]he chief problem that troubled Walt was the length of time it might take the doctors to perfect the process. How long would it be before the surgical experts could bring a treated cadaver back to working life? To be brutally practical, could it be guaranteed, in fact, that he could be brought back in time to rectify the mistakes his successors would almost certainly start making at EPCOT the moment he was dead?" "It was about this time that Walt Disney became acquainted with the experiments into the process known as cryogenesis, or what one newspaper termed "the freeze-drying of the human cadaver after death, for eventual resuscitation."(both quotes excerpts from Disney's World by Leonard Mosley)In light of the evidence, Walt Disney's interest in cryopreservation is clear. 3. How we know Walt Disney chose cryopreservation at death.Walt Disney was one to take on technology, from multiplane camera to the first animatronic. This is not to mention Walt's envisioning of EPCOT, his own brainchild of a residential community of the future. Walt was always looking ahead, and was always wanting to try new things. And reasonably, given Walt's interest in the process of cryopreservation as shown by the writings of Leonard Mosley and Marc Eliot, cryopreservation was no exception to his goals. Reasonably thinking, if Walt did decide to become cryopreserved, he probably would have decided not to have it announced in case the process did not work out in the end, forcing the U.S. to mourn the death of 'uncle walt' not once, but two times.However, cryopreservation is extremely expensive, and Walt knew he had a family that would need to be financially taken care of after he was gone. Furthermore, it is known that body was cremated [6].Despite these facts, neither truth falsifies Walt Disney from having been cryopreserved. In fact, many people choose to only have their heads cryopreserved rather than their entire body - this way they can cut the massive costs being cryopreserved in the first place.[7] This solves both criticisms neatly.There's more than that though. The first recorded cryopreserved body was the body of Dr. James Bedford in January, 1967.[8] Exactly one month before then? December 1966, the date of Walt Disney's death from lung cancer. This time was happening during the first cryopreservation hype - many people were already attempting to become the first among those who were cryopreserved before the death of Walt, but were never successfully cryopreserved on account of outside influences, not because of the process of the cryopreservation itself.[8] This closeness of dates, plus being during a time where people around the country were trying to become the first cryopreserved patients is beyond coincidence. Given the public interest, and Walt's strong interest in the science of it, Walt must have, without a doubt, chosen to give it a shot.4. Thawed in the near future.This point is half proven by the first argument in light of recent events where scientists were capable of bringng a prehistoric virus back to life, as well as using rivivifiying prehistoric frog genomes. The near future may be anywhere between the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy years, and possibly one hundred at most. What we do know for sure however is that science is progressing rapidly, and that, if scientists are already capable of reviving cells today, what will scientists be capable of reviving mere decades from now?The books Disney's World and Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince not linked here.[1] - http://www.bbc.com...[2] - http://www.bbc.com...[3] - http://www.independent.co.uk...[4] - http://en.wikipedia.org...[5] - http://www.amazon.com...[6] - http://www.biography.com...[7] - http://www.davidbrin.com...[8] - http://www.alcor.org...