God exists

Concerning this topic, I believe that it is more reasonable that theism ( a belief in god) is true rather than atheism. I will present 3 different arguments for the existence of God and the opposing representative for that will attempt to give arguments better than mine against god or tear down my arguments successfully and thoroughly. With that in mind I shall begin. Firstly I would like to present my first argument for Gods existence. 1. Every being that comes into existence has a cause. 2. The Universe began to exist. 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause (God) for its existence. Now I will examine the first two premises. My first premise states that every being that begins to exist has a cause for since it came into existence one moment and all moments before that were the same then a cause is needed. This premise is quite hard to tear down considering the sound logic supporting it. The second premise has been supported by modern science and many atheist have admitted that there was a big bang where all matter, space and time came into existence (which parallels exactly with Genesis when God says "let there be light" considering the almost instant explosion of all matter into existence). This argument is airtight in the fact that the premises are commonly accepted facts of sciences that lead to the fact that there is a cause for the universes existence that created it. My second argument is the one of the moral argument. 1. If objective moral values exist, God exist. 2. Objective moral values exist 3. Therefore, God exist. Now the first premise is true because this is already a pre-supposed fact of the two sides of opposition and the foundation for which there arguments lay. If God exist then he is the source of of all good and there is good and bad and wicked will not go unpunished. And if there is no God then there is no objective moral values because you can even quote Richard Dawkins who is not only a genius in the scientific field but is one of the four horsemen of the "New Atheism" and in his book "The God Delusion" he says that humans are electro-chemical machines controlled by mindless genes. It cant be much clearer that this premise is true and that if objective moral values exist it adds to the list of evidences and countless arguments supporting the existence of God. Now my second premise is quite involved with the audience of readers and that is because of this. Atheist argue that we are simply a collection of molecules with no meaning and that what is good and bad to us is only built through the trends of society and that there is no defining good and bad to prove there is more to us than what Dawkins described us as. But if that's the case then anything would be acceptable and it entirely is dependent upon the socio-relativism of what you grow up in. So I ask you if the Holocaust is unacceptable and evil to you and you agree then you already accept objective moral values for us humans recognize a consistent good and bad we adhere to that cant be changed through society because we all know the Holocaust is not acceptable anywhere but then you affirm moral values and therefore confirm evidence for the existence of the needed transcendent reality which thousands agree upon as God. My third argument is simply the fine-tuning design of the universe. This just helps put into perspective the chances that atheism is right. Because if atheism is right then everything here happened by chance and I hope to end my opening statement simply for you to consider and ponder yourselves which is the probability of us humans having all the right proteins, and the earth being lined up exactly the correct distance from the sun for life on earth, the complexity of the eye was said by Darwin (a evolutionary biologist and an atheist) to be a mystery to him for it was so complex and so exactly set up in the one way for us to see that it marveled him. When I took AP Biology in High school I was amazed at how if one of the thousands of proteins in our bodies was changed AT ALL then you would die. Our bodies complexity is amazing in such a way that Aristotle couldn't even put into words. In William Paleys works he speaks about how it is almost impossible that life should even exist by chance and it has been estimated by Astrophysicist that the chance of the proteins arranging themselves in such a fashion comes out to 1 in 10^250 power. So Id like to leave that figure with you and how that practically puts it out there the chances of athesims idea of how life came to be all through evolutionary chance (1 in 10^250) and the much-supported idea of an intelligent designer. Id like to leave you with these arguments and so far I have shown through airtight logic and reason that theism is more reasonable than atheism and until an atheism tears down these 3 arguments entirely I see no reason to doubt theism. As an atheist you may think you have purpose in life but if we all are ultimately doomed to the grave then nothing ultimately matters. You may think living a "good" life with what time you have is worth it but in an atheist worldview there is no adequate basis for what "good" is and it doesn't matter because you may leave your mark on the world you think but the world is doomed to die and the universe is doomed and we are all awaiting our inescapable execution for which atheism supports. Life is absurd without God and you have no meaning when in the end you and everyone will cease to exist and your deeds mean nothing but God gives you meaning and purpose and value to your life and Iv given good reason to believe so and I testify to you all that theism is the answer to life's deepest questions and I hope you realize the logic behind this.