God exist, and belief in His existence is rationally justified.

You made some great points in your arguments, however you have a lot of mistakes and fallacies. You said in the beginning there for premise one that there was no way of telling if it was true. But then you turned around and said in the very next sentence that we know it's not true because.... So that is a self contradiction, because if we can't know it's true than we can't know that it's false. What's wrong with the Big Bang? Many, many things. The idea that a cosmic explosion caused everything and anything to come into existence is absurd and illogical. There's a law of thermodynamics that states chaos cannot produce order. We have order in this world: the sun rises, the sun sets, the moon comes out. Let's say a tornado rustled through a junkyard and at the end it created a 2014 Kia Soul. We would knowthat's impossible, that's improbable. Also, natural laws can only act on things that already exist, so they can't be the first cause for the universe. The universe is not eternal, if that's what your implying. 2nd law of thermodynamics: processes taking place in a closed system always more toward a state of equilibrium. In other words, unless outside energy is added to a closed system, the usable energy within the system will eventually run down. In our universe we still have energy, which we would not have if the universe was eternal. We all know it's impossible to count up to infinity because there's always at least one more need to count. Well it's just as counting up to infinity is impossible, so is counting down. We could never get to the preset moment if we had to cross an actual infinite number of moments in the past. Yet the present is real. Since the present moment is real, it must have been preceded by a finite past that includes a beginning or first event. Therefore the universe had a beginning. Oscillating universe theory : Con has shown me a picture of a oscillating universe and then made the claim that an expanding and retracting universe proves that no god is needed. However, this oscillating universe theory has many holes in it. For one, there are no known laws of physics that shows why the universe would need go retract and expand. The oscillating universe theory would be good if science and physical laws weren't involved. If the gravity rte was higher then the expansion rate then yeah I would believe it. But the opposite is true. The expansion rate of the universe is greater than the pull of gravity. Con:"if the being had no value to space or time, then it does not exist." I strongly disagree. I'm not saying that God or this being has no value in space or time. I'm saying that because He created space and time He cannot be bound by either. So that brings to our next argument, the law of causality; stating every event has a cause. So, God not being confined by space or time is exempt from this law. Thus he would not need a creator. Well that brings us to a common objection. "The universe was created for a chance." This is wrong. Chance is based on measurements of probability and statistics, which are all defined and observed within space and time. We, then, cannot say that chance can operate outside of space and time. Since the only logical alternative to chance is choice, and choice is the result of intelligence, the universe had to have an intelligent origin. http://christian-contemplate.blogspot.com...