obamacare

I have multiple scources for this claim. 1. I lived there for 6years, 2. My family lives there, well mst of it, 3. http://www.criticalaccesshealth.com...; And this site shows how OBAMACARE will kill these hospials: http://www.texastribune.org...My plan is cheaper because it will cost more at first but less in the long run. Because of the incentves for company's to give insurance. And my plan will work better because it will increasecompetition, not decrease it. It's basic economics, obama care will hu economy in the long term and mine wont. I did respond to your pricing. DO I NEED TO BE MORE CLEAR. I talked about it multiple times. "My opponent drops the CBO study that Obamacare pays for itself and more. So Obamacare costs nothing because it saves so much money that it pays for itself. It even adds $210 billion to the government coffers.".You say i make no sense... jez. Its simple, If the goverment pays for more things it wount pay for itself. That's self explanatoy thats why I didnt respond to that. Things tat my 9 year old sister can figure out make is obvius. "His only conceivable refutation is "here read this link and watch this video." I continue trying to advise him that debate requires him to explain his arguments himself."Thats what i've been doing! the video is just a scource! My plan isnt socialized, because obamaCare takes over a whole indistry. Mine helps the private sector acheive its goal. COmmunis is goverment control, mine is actually goving more control and benifits to the people not the goverment. So you assumption is false. "All of my opponent's "quality of care" arguments would obviously apply to his free government-run hospitals with slave-labor interns doing all the work. Sounds more like a "death factory" than a hospital."They aren't slaves, The medical interns ere in med school. My dad's a doctor so they are in training at school. He did surgerys in med school and he wasn't a 'slave'. So my care is increased in privae hospitals. Becuase the interns graduate and become doctos at the pther hospital, having experience. The public one having sub-par healthcare helps the real doctors. So it increases care for people who actually pay for their care. So my plan is still better. ==your income taxes comment== I like how you do that = sign thing. That makes no sense. Lwering taxes saved us in the 2001 reccession, it was breif. Notice under Carter the economy was on the dec, after reagan and his economics took control the economy ined, declined, then inclined again. So it does create jobs, so look up the facts, not the assumptions. Here's a site if you want more explation: http://www.conservatismtoday.com...Since I am using localy paid taxes, lowering federal taxes won't hurt the spending process. So your assmption forgot my whole deal on where the taxes came from. Since the plan is under state control they can do what they want. Build 5 hospitals in 80 0ars if they want, but my plan allows more choice, therefore making it better. "With more than half of the government's revenue gone, the government would basically be forced to abolish the military, Social Security, and Medicare."I would not have to do that because it is paid locally. You just said that, memory. So since all of that is federal then none of that would dissapear. So that fails. My plan still holds here too.Yes they would be forced to work there. I am forced to go to school, your forced to go to school too (collage is optional though) so that is slavery too, We are forced to work at school. So it is not slavery, and interns get pay on certian occasions, it is small but its there. So it is hardley at all savery. I did refute all of what you said, and plus you still to respond to both of my videos, the coays add up, every single tax raise on ma care (only said something about a few of them), havent effely shown your case on obamacare spending beause it is obvious that spending and more spending does NOT = less spending. It's all simple logic. And my france comment, so if my plan is lire's ad there;s is supposedly best how is mine bad? The HHS study is wrong. I have countless links on how it increases spending. Gruber: I have a link for the 41%, and also all of his statement debunk your whole theory, and hae made the bill partially. So w=that being said, that means all of what you have said is false. "My opponent presumes here that all of the uninsured will start getting breast cancer screenings, which are only recommended for WOMEN over FIFTY. I can't believe my opponent is haggling over TEN DOLLARS when his plan routinely gives away FIFTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLAR procedures for free."Undemy plan people without insurance will decrease over time, so tat 55 thouthand will diminish slowly. And the 10$ co-pay is permanent nder obamaCare so every year that adds up, where as my plan decreaces spending overtime, another fallacy. Do you want me to get a lawer, write thisbill, then send it to you so I can be more clear!3:1 brain melted I read so much of obama care and don't know where to look. If you tell me it's likely section ill read it and tell ya'll in the comments section after this ... So tired. Obamacare fines are either $695 or 2.5% of family income, whichever is larger. My opponent asks "which is it?" The answer: WHICHEVER IS LARGER. Take 2.5% of your family's income: if that's less than $695, you pay $695 in fines; if that's more than $695, you pay the 2.5%. Odd you think a bill would choose one ot the other, that's the problem with politics. They just want you money, and the mandate is unconstitutional anyway, its at te suprme court now, and since it is a 5:4 conservative advantage then this topic may be uselles in a few weeks, lets hope. Why LOL Bachman? Your argumants save people money. Cool, except when the taxes rise, Gruber on that link said all of this, so so far someone who made the bill said its gonna do opposite of what it was supposed to, so most of your points are invalid anyway so why refute them? The tax on tanning salons. I don't care for them but it is not the goverments buissns to dictate what things you can do, indirectly through taxes, or through law unless it is terrible for you i.e. drugs. Skin cancer isn't linked to organized crime. Yes cadilac plans are epensive, and those rich people deserve bette rbecause they pay more, under obama care people pay more or less ut get the same care, obamacare = unfairMedicare and medicaid and the army will all be cut due to obacare so none of this matters.