The amendment preventing presidents to serve more than two terms should be abolished.

I excuse my opponent for not posting his argument at time as he was 'swamped' with R06;work.R06; I'm now going to show out my points....R06; If the American public wants the president to stay, then the president should stay! I would R06;have thought this was common sense. By restricting a president to two terms only, they R06;are potentially preventing the American public from getting the president they want, it's R06;just stupid and makes no sense at all.R06; R06; R06; It should be up to the people how long a president stays in office NOT some stupid peace of R06;ancient paper or antiquated ideas of a bunch of presidents who are long long dead. R06; A four-year term is nowhere near enough time to affect any real change in the country. If R06;they are lucky enough to get elected to a second term then they might actually see a few R06;results of their efforts. More than likely, though, the president that follows a two-term R06;president will be from the other political party. This will most likely negate any change that R06;has been made since most politicians? decisions are ego based shortsighted. If the majority R06;of Americans are happy to keep re-electing a president then so be it.R06; What if America was in poor shape and a really great president came along, fixed the R06;country up and had us in the best shape of our history. Unfortunately, the president would R06;have to leave after a second term and leave us with potentially detrimental change. R06; Yes , I agree that the US presidents should be allowed to serve more than two terms. The R06;constitution of USA states that a president can serve four terms period. But the tradition R06;and the practice started with George Washington who served only two term. And after him R06;every other president served only for two terms. If a president feels that he is doing a good R06;job and so do the citizens of the country US presidents should be allowed to serve more R06;than two terms.R06; I believe a true democracy is choosing a leader that the people want. Why limit a leader to R06;only two terms if the leader is great? The people who are saying no believe that there R06;would be corruption. However, presidents were allowed to have more than two terms R06;before Truman, and there was no corruption in the elections. People who say no also say R06;that 8 years is long enough. But what if those 8 years were the best years economically R06;and politically? If the people like the president, then the people should be allowed to vote R06;for the president for as many terms. Once the president makes mistakes or a better R06;candidate comes around, then the president won't be re-elected. It's that simple. If R06;presidents were allowed more than two terms, then this country would be doing much R06;better.R06; As the Declaration of Independence states, we the people have the rights of life, liberty, R06;and pursuit of happiness. Who are we to disobey the rules of our country? Why can the R06;Constitution say that we can't but the Declaration says we can? We can also vote for who R06;we want to be President- our government is a republic in which the people rule through R06;elected officials. The president of the United States should definitely be able to run for more R06;than 2 terms.R06; I STRONGLY REQUEST VOTERS TO VOTE BY FACT AND POWER OF DEBATE NOT BY OPINION. Adil Muhammad, Qatar