God does not and cannot exist

Okay, time to wrap this up. To be honest, the clarity of your writing is pretty low, and I apologize in advance if I state your position wrongly. First off, I did not skip "all the things you mentioned", I basically quoted your entire argument as being an unverifiable belief. In summary, you wrote a fairy tale that many people delude themselves into believing as real. Also, my elaboration on ancient gods is completely relevant and essentially has to do with everything. I am quite sure that your ears have been overwhelmed with people saying that there is no god, and that all evidence points toward this fact. I am equally sure that you utterly dismiss these dissenting voices as ignorant and foolish (the exact words you called me lol). But what I attempt to show logically with this argument is the psychological aspects of supernatural belief. Just as ancient people once utilized Zeus and Poseidon to explain natural events, so do modern people cite "God" (Jesus, Yahweh, Allah) as the creator of the universe and of intelligent life. The idea is that science has explained these natural events, and therefore, these archaic gods are no longer worshiped. Going along this line of thought, when the origin of the universe is explained fully, one can no longer ascribe this event to God. Much the same with the origin of life. When these key discoveries occur, I sincerely believe that people will no longer continue to believe that "a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree." Is there a god of nuclear fusion? Of course not, such a thought is insane. But why? It is because we did not have any need to explain this event through metaphysical means, for the discovery and explanation of the process went hand in hand. The point of mentioning this is to show that human nature invariably turns to the supernatural to explain the physical world. However, when the scientific (read: correct) process yields an answer, the gods associated with this process invariably vanish. I hope you think this over and see the truth of this argument. You believe in God because: "of his creation, the earth, and all the living things on it, He has made, It is his handywork." The great works he has done in my life and others through prayer, healing, miracles, cancer cured, doctors have no explanation, a man says are you the Jesus people, and he says he was the dead man that they prayed for. People taken to Heaven, to hell, People that see angels, demons, Jesus. The love, and trust, and friendship Christians have. The change that comes when people give their lives to God, The chains that are broken such as addictions." Every single one of the things you first mentioned can or will be explained via science. I'm sure that everyone reading this understands the basics of planetary formation, though if not, http://en.wikipedia.org... here you go. Also, saying that God cures diseases is wholly false. Doctors do not have "no explanation" for a patient who recovers, they merely did not expect the aforementioned patient to make such a recovery. Every healing can be explained through probability and the body's natural healing processes. Think of the untold millions who have died in a hospital bed, fervently praying to God to heal them. You may say something about God working in mysterious ways, or that these people were not "true Christians, and therefore did not deserve healing. This is false; the true explanation is that there is no God, and that unlikely recoveries are merely the byproduct of natural processes. Same for addictions: motivation is the most major factor in staying off a drug. Yet it is not God helping people, it is merely people deluding themselves that a god exists, which aids in motivation. Voters, the obvious choice here is to vote Pro. However, I am sure that many of you reading this are faithful to your fairytale beliefs and would no more vote for me than you would piss on a Bible. The point of me proposing this debate was not to win, but only to advance the argument of science replacing god. Of course, this is a well-worn topic, but I hope my comparisons to the ancient Roman gods will stick in at least one mind, and perhaps sway one opinion. The sooner we as an intelligent race stop our pointless belief in the supernatural, the sooner we can move on with mastering the physical world. Also, if I was completely wrong and I end up meeting God face to face, I'm pretty sure that he would be pleased with the lifesaving work in Biomedical Engineering that I'll have done with my life. If he would accept a pathetic loser who prays over a contributing member of society who doesn't, then I wouldn't want to accept such a shitty god anyways. And yes, there are scientists who accept god. But there are many, many more who do not. That was a useless thing to say, and I'm pretty sure that it is YOU who chooses not to open your eyes to the truth around you. Good luck on your final round! However, I would like to see some proof for people being taken to Hell and Heaven, or for Angels and Demons existing. Those are beliefs as supernatural as any fairytale: they are not real. Reality is defined through our concrete experience of the natural world around us, not some fables written in a book. An omnipotent being cannot exist. Answer this sufficiently: Can god make a rock too heavy to lift? Either way, there will be something which god cannot do, shattering the ideal of omnipotence. You believe that God is a male because the Bible refers to god this way. This was done by the writers to put women at a disadvantage and to keep women subservient to man. If a woman believe that men are more god-like than women, they will forever be at a psychological disadvantage, which was the aim of the writers of the Bible and Torah.