"Pinning the homosexuals" is a terrible idea

First off, my opponent tries to create a distinction between justices and jobs based on what Jewish men wrote. This debate is to be focused on the Bible, though, so lets see what it has to say. Pro says, "Jesus, Paul, and James all have teachings in which they: only list justices and cite the precept, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'" Well, Pro is wrong. Jesus said, "THINK NOT THAT I AM COME TO DESTROY THE LAW, OR THE PROPHETS: I AM NOT COME TO DESTROY, BUT TO FULFIL"(Matthew 5:17). The Law includes the first five books of Moses as any Biblical scholar will admit. Well, what is in the first five books of Moses, then? Leviticus 20:13 says, "If a man lie with mankind, as he lieth with woman, both of them have committed an abomination: THEY SHALL SURELY BE PUT TO DEATH." If Jesus didn't come to destroy the Law, then he must be in agreement with this verse. Plus, Jesus also said, "THINK NOT THAT I AM COME TO SEND PEACE ON EARTH: I CAME NOT TO SEND PEACE, BUT A SWORD"(Matthew 10:34). Jesus didn't just cite, "Love your neighbor as yourself." The problem with people citing that verse is they never consider any other circumstance. Suppose a murderer broke into your house, raped your wife, and killed your kids. Would you love him as thyself? Or would you defend your family? Jesus believed in protecting yourself. He told his disciples, "But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: AND HE THAT HATH NO SWORD, LET HIM SELL HIS GARMENT, AND BUY ONE"(Luke 22:36). Thus, you can't love everyone as yourself. Paul condemned homosexuality in THE NEW TESTAMENT. Romans 1:27 says, "And likewise also the men, LEAVING THE NATURAL USE OF THE WOMAN, BURNED IN THEIR LUST ONE TOWARD ANOTHER, MEN WITH MEN WORKING THAT WHICH IS UNSEEMLY, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error(AIDS/HIV) which was meet." Verse 32 says, "Who knowing the judgment of God, that THEY WHICH COMMIT SUCH THINGS ARE WORTHY OF DEATH." No, my friend, they did not "only list justices." What my opponent needs to remember is that when they listed a few of the Ten Commandments as the Law, that was apart of the first five books of Moses. The Commands against homosexuality were included in the first five books of Moses. This makes it apart of the Law. The words "justices" and "jobs" are not apart of the Bible as my opponent uses them. Also my opponent should remember something else: The law of Moses is NEVER called the Ten Commandments. It comprises only statutes and judgments which God gave him to communicate to the people. The difference between the law of Moses and the Ten Commandments is that God spoke the ten words, but MOSES delivered the statutes and judgments. Now, let us recall that when Moses first delivered the statutes and judgments, THE LAW OF MOSES HAD NO SACRIFICES CONNECTED WITH IT. Jeremiah said so! (Jer. 7:22). The law of Moses was originally the civil law based on the principles of the Ten Commandments. These civil statutes and judgments are right and good (Psalm 119:7,8). But AFTER the close of the old covenant (Ex. 24), the Levitical priesthood was established and the laws regulating offerings were added (Exodus 28:1). (Prior to this time offerings were voluntary and young men were priests -- Exodus 24:5.) Therefore the law of Moses HAS MORE THAN ONE PART! Notice God's definition of the original part of that law in Malachi 4:4: "Remember the law of my servant Moses, the statutes and judgments that I commanded him at Horeb for all Israel." THIS law we are not to forget. We are to keep it! BUT ADDED TO THIS LAW LATER WERE OTHER STATUTES REGULATING MATERIAL RITUALS, SUCH AS SACRIFICES, LIGHTING OF CANDLES, BURNING INCENSE, AND VARIOUS WASHINGS FOR THE UNCLEAN. This almost unnoticed fact is what causes so much difficulty in understanding that the LAW OF MOSES WAS COMPOSED OF TWO DISTINCT PARTS: THE CIVIL AND THE RITUALISTIC! Part of Law of Moses Still in Force! Jesus said the two great commandments were love to God and love to neighbor. Do you know from where He quoted these laws? Out of the book of the law! -- the laws that Moses spoke to the people. Read it in Leviticus 19:18: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." And Deuteronomy 6:4: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might." There is no difference then between the "justices" and "jobs." Both are apart of the the Law. Now if we built a large fence to contain the queers on one side, and lesbians on the other, they would die out because they can't reproduce. There is no argument there. My opponent is arguing, though, that heterosexuals would still be giving birth to queers. This is not true. First, queers are not born, they choose to be that way. If someone was considering being a homosexual, they would think twice if they knew they would be locked behind an electric fence! Further, I would like to ask my opponent a question. If God created everyone the way they are(meaning queers are born that way), then why would God condemn it in the Old Testament, as well as by Paul in the New Testament? Surely, God is being unfair if he is condemning homosexuals, but He made them that way? No, my friend, God DID NOT MAKE THEM THAT WAY! Homosexuality is a sin!