Anyone who doesn't enjoy Disney's Frozen has no place in civilized society.

I shall now begin constructing my own. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines civilized as "marked by well-organized laws and rules about how people behave with each other" and "polite, reasonable, and respectful" [1]. It defines society as "people in general thought of as living together in organized communities with shared laws, traditions, and values. " Thus we may define civilized society as a community of people with laws regarding their behavior and interactions. I maintain that people who do not enjoy Frozen can still have a place within civilized society. I accept the groups my opponent lists as disliking Frozen. I might even add radical feminists [2] to that list. Now, my opponent presumes that the only reason people wouldn't see Frozen is because they lack money or time. The people who lack money, my opponent claims, could simply pirate the movie. Perhaps these people do not have computers. People who cannot afford a movie ticket likely cannot afford a computer. So the question becomes, can people without computers be beneficial to society? Well, once Skynet takes over the world, people without computers will become all that's left of society. Surely we have an interest in preserving the human race? There are potentially people who lack the time, but there might also be people who lack children. This may come as a great surprise, but the primary age demographic of Disney films is children. There are some couples that just do not have children of any age. Apparently, 43% of Gen-X women and 32% of Gen-X men do not have any children [3]. These people would then be unlikely to see Frozen. Additionally, there are many states where gay and lesbian parents cannot adopt. Is my opponent revealing homophobia by decreeing that gay and lesbian couples, since they do not have kids and thus are more likely to not see Frozen, have no place in society? Do all of these people have no place at all in civilized society? It is not too late to correct the error of their ways. These people can still be rehabilitated and made to understand the brilliance of Frozen. There is even evidence that Frozen itself wants this occur. Remember, love is an open door. We cannot go against the wishes of Frozen and slam the door shut on the poor and childless. We have a responsibility to help these people understand the glorious film they've been missing out on. Those who watched Frozen and still disliked it are a different story. Generally, they prove immune to rehabilitation efforts. However, I still believe that even they have a place in civilized society. Religious nuts who dislike Frozen for having magic in it also dislike some of the greatest films and stories in existence, such as Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter (those these are not quite as good as Frozen). Such people cannot be reasoned with. They are highly unlikely to ever realize just how magnificent a film Frozen is. They are unable to let it go, it referring to their own intolerance. Now, my opponent claims that these people hold back society. This is true if they are allowed to wield influence or power. However, if we reduce the status of these people, they cannot hold society back. They still have a place in civil society. We all have a need for janitors, waiters, maids, garbage men, people who fetch coffee, etc. By allowing the people who have seen Frozen and still dislike it to take over menial jobs, we afford other people more time and resources to see Frozen. This also provides the benefit of removing one of the problems mentioned earlier - those without the time to see Frozen now have more time and thus can see the movie. People who are overly political correct can serve the same function in civil society as super religious fundamentalists. This also applies to those who didn't enjoy Frozen but are unable to articulate any rational arguments as to why. I repeat, the place of these people in civil society is to take over menial tasks and grunt work, thereby affording the rest of society more time to watch Frozen (or watch Frozen again, as it is impossible to see Frozen too many times). Thus, although the opinions and thoughts of people against Frozen are invalid, they can still possess a valuable place in civil society, and the people unfortunate enough to have not yet experience Frozen can still be saved. For the first time in forever, once they see Frozen (which, yes, can always be viewed, even in summer), they will doubtlessly recognize the genius of the film and become worthy members of society. If they dislike the film, we can always use another dishwasher. [1] . http://www.merriam-webster.com... [2] . https://medium.com...[3] . http://www.dinklife.com...