Resolved: That naturalized U.S. citizens should be able to run for President of America

To give you an idea, viewers, of exactly what we will be debating is the reasonability behind this paragraph of the constitution. "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States. " Argument one: First, we need to have some one born and raised in america to make the proper the decisions for our country. People from other countries, our born and raised differently and in their countries, tought different ways of government. Some one born and raised in our country, has more experience with our customs and ways of living. People who have grown up watching great leaders of our country pass, and learning the ways in which we can be a better country from first hand experience. We need leaders who know whats best for our country form what they've been taught from birth. for example, if we had a chinese immigrant run for president who has been raised learning that communism is a good thing, we are imposing that are government take a course we have sworn never to enter. Our presidents need to make the right decisions for our country. argument two: Age limits. .. Why do we have the age limits? We want the best fit person for leading our country. The older the person is, the more experience with life they have. They have learned more things in life than say a 22 year old has. They have had oppurtunities at learning, most have experienced what it is like to be a father, which helps judge leadership. we need some one who can take care of our country. being a president is alot of hard work. It takes, alot of wisdom, all your time and effort, and some one responsible enough to do it. The older people are, the more of a sense of responsibility they have because they have had more experience with it. argument three: Its not that we are racist or sexist or anything. If so miss clinton, or Obama would not have made it in the elections. All the candidatess have had experience with life, which allows them to be more trustable for presidents. immigrants, alot of times have different views they have adopted from their own countries. MY OPPONENT- "People may not be able to choose where they are born but they can choose where they pledge their allegiance. " This is true, but that person is always going to carry aprat of his old beliefs with him. We cannot know that they will not adopt them into the ruling of our country. Its not like their completely useless in law without being born here though. They can still vote, they can still run for other positions of power, such as supreme court membership, etc. But choosing some one for president is a very important process. it involves Choosing the person who holds are freedom in the palm of his/her hands. We need to make the besst decision possible. Thnaks for offering this debate bored. It should be interesting and fun. i look forward to your response.