The Bible proves that Jesus was not God!

ARGUMENT 1. A. The CON has implied in his first sentence that the Father and God are not the same. If John meant the father and not God then who is the father? B. The Con then flip flops and declares his trinitarian view that the father is God, so which is it? If you believe that they are one in the same, then wouldn't it be necessary that when John speaks about the father he is talking about God? C. The Con must deal with the scripture. Jesus says that the father is greater than I. According to the trinitarian view they are all one, which means they are equal. Jesus does not say that they are equal he said that the father was greater than himself. D. It is illogical to read a passage that states that the father is greater than Jesus, and then to proclaim that they are one in the same. ARGUMENT 2. A. You have not dealt with the passage I used, which clearly quantifies my statement that Jesus was not God, because he didn't know things, specifically about the second coming. Jesus puts himself on the same level as the angels, not on the level with God the father. B. We are not debating the trinity of God we are debating "The Bible proves that Jesus is not God". You must deal with the passage. C. Besides your scripture quote only does more harm to you. Verse nine states that God bestowed upon Jesus, if Jesus was God, then he could have bestowed things upon himself. ARGUMENT 3. A. "Up until around the 9th century AD (the advent of the Masoretic Text), the Hebrew words in the Scriptures lacked vowels. More than that, the sentences in the Hebrew Scriptures had no capital letters, commas, apostrophes, question marks, quotation marks, exclamation marks, or semicolons. Neither were there verse or chapter divisions." http://www.restorersofzion.org... B. "Koine Greek was the language used by writers of the Old Testament Greek Septuagint and the Greek New Testament. The original Greek New Testament was written in all capital letters, without spaces, punctuation, accents or diacritical marks." http://biblescripture.net... The Old and the New Testaments were not written in English, so your capitalization argument is invalid. C. You make reference to an "Exclusive article", to which I think you mean definite article. Both passages sited use articles before "son of man", only "A" is an indefinite article and "The" is a definite article. Either way the passage in Psalms clearly states that one should not put trust in "A" son of man. This would mean to not put trust in any son of man which would include Jesus. ARGUMENT 4. A. If Jesus was going back to be with the father then the father was not with him. Besides where was the father when Jesus said in Matthew 27:46: My God, My God, why have you forsaken me? Certainly Jesus was not forsaking himself, so who was forsaking him, God was? Because Jesus is not and was not God. B. Also the point of my argument was clearly stated that Jesus received power from the father. If Jesus was God then another God would not have to give it to him, especially if there is only one God. ARGUMENT 5. CON: "Conclusion: Jesus did claim to be God." A. Well Jesus says he is not God Mark 10:18 Why do you call me good? No one is good, except God alone. Here Jesus emphatically makes a distinction between himself and God. So either this is a contradiction, or Jesus is not God. The Bible proves that Jesus was not God.