Whether ISIS could (beyond reasonable doubt) march to Rome and "dethrone" the Pope.

Please show any evidence that there in fact are ISIS sympathizers in Italy, Two (Italians) detained after Italian police find Isis flag:http://www.thelocal.it...1,000s of ISIS fighters from Europe & Italy:http://www.washingtonpost.com...The 1960 Civil rights movement led by MLK was peaceful and was not aimed at dethroning anyone.The point of this example was to show how an organized crowd of protesters could meet the definition of a march. Obviously the crowd wasn't armed or rioting.Again, you assume ISIS is supported in Rome, but fail to show it.You must have missed in Round 3 where I mentioned that over 3,000+ ISIS fighters have come from Europe, including at least 50 from Italy http://www.washingtonpost.com... http://www.bbc.com....And according to this source: Italy also has the fourth largest muslim population in Europe (2.2 million) http://www.ibtimes.com... There is thus a clearly demonstrated Islamic presence in Italy and throughout Europe - with evidence of ISIS sympathies. You assume that a Muslim rebellion will be the outcome, yet you have no proof, only pointing to nearby countries with a far bigger Muslim population than Italy and say "look! it happened here!"Italy is barely a 100 miles from Libya and Tunisia - both of which are former Italian colonies and have huge Muslim populations. Libya also has one of the largest ISIS infiltrations in the world (over 1,000 fighter have come from Libya and 3,000 have come from Tunisia), and would be a perfect base of operations to spring board attacks against Italy. According to the Italian Secret Service; "throngs of Libyan immigrants & refugees" have already made there way to Italy successfully by boat. And now Italian officials are worried about a hijacked plane making its way too. (http://www.breitbart.com...) This is not enough evidence to convince anyone that a muslim uprising would happen in Italy, specifically RomeIf it happened in Europe, then it could easily happen in Italy. This logic should be self-evident based on part by EU open-borders agreements and Italy's close proximity with countries where mulism riots have occurred.10 people would not make it past the Popes guard, Swiss guard, Gendarmerie, and Italian Police.A lone-wolf sniper/suicide bomber could. On top of that, I see no reason to believe why an organized mob of angry armed men could not breach the Vatican or reach the Pope if he's traveling abroad or hosting an outdoor rally. Here, a well placed IED against the Pope Mobile could also suffice. They (Italian police) also have more powerful weapons,They won't if ISIS is able to smuggle in a WMD. This could happen.The Italian Police: A formidable force.The problem with relying on police & security tactics for counter-terrorism in general is that security officials & procedures must be successful 100% of the time against multiple threats in order to prevent a terrorist attack. Yet we know it only takes 1 successful attack to kill a VIP, cause political/economic chaos, or do serious damage. A formidable police force therefore, (while increasing the attack difficulty) does not actually prove that a successful attack against the Vatican or the Pope would be impossible. Most Plausible Rome-Dethrone Scenario.The most plausible ISIS "march on Rome/dethrone the Pope" scenario is simply an assassination of the current Pope while he is in Rome or traveling aboard. This can be accomplished either through a Lone-wolf sniper bullet or a well-placed IED. Both militant killing methods have already been demonstrated effectively by ISIS in Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere. Assassinating the current Pope does fulfill Con's original definition of The Pope and "dethrone;" which is to to physically remove from any position of power or authority. And where Pope is defined as "The leading figure in Catholicism," who of course is none other than Pope Francis http://en.wikipedia.org.... If this is not sufficient for some reason, then I maintain the position that a WMD attack against the Vatican could wipe out the "office" as well as the current Pope. A march to/on Rome is thus accomplished by an ISIS propaganda rally inside Rome following a successful assassination or terrorist attack. Which is also within ISIS's current capabilities.As Pro, my role to prove the resolution has not been to prove that ISIS "will" march to Rome & dethrone the Pope; only that it "could." And with the terrorist methods and tactics that I've expressed, I've argued that each are either within ISIS's current military capabilities or within easy grasp. These tactics could succeed "without a doubt," and therefore fulfill by BOP for the resolution. If you agree with me, vote Pro! that is all I have to say.Thank you sir for the debate-you have done a great job.My pleasure. Well done also.