BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous god EX 34:14

Yep christians, that's the name of your god as he named himself in your bible as "jealous". Pretty tragic and appalling. After all jealousy is nothing more than anger as disguised fear. And this god of yours also freely admitted that he has baggage issues such as anger, wrath, vengeance, rage, fury, and evil. Those are emotions that are befitting of a supreme deity - right? Well if you think so then you most assuredly believe that this god of yours is pure hate and nothing but. You are also as immoral as this god of yours is and yet you cannot even prove that this god even exists! After all this god of yours bastilled man with those emotions so in turn man could learn to hate with at least 1 billion dead all in the supposed "good"name of this christian god on the battlefields alone. "More people have died in the name of god than for any other reason." George Carlin and he's right. Yet strangely, and what christians DON'T GET is that this god of theirs could have started out with peace, love, harmony, kindness, care etc etc etc AND KEPT IT. Nah this supposed god of theirs, in which they cannot even prove exists (snicker snick the munching green waits - Barry King), has never made peace, or cared about it enough to have kept it, as this god of theirs is more concerned about evil, anger, wrath, vengeance, rage, fury, jealousy and clearly pain and suffering especially among children, and most importantly flexing his muscles to absolutely show who is in charge and showing his superior ego god complex in which the bible is all about and nothing else. Rules: Show that this god of the bible utterly believes in kindness, care, harmony, peace, love etc, and in no possible way believes in the contradictory hypocritical anger, wrath, vengeance, rage, fury, jealousy, evil etc. Chapters and verses only please. dsjpk5 will not be allowed to vote in the voting process.
Posion is bad for you

Paracetamol is the same as Tylenol, I live in America. It is a pain medication. Vitamin K is important for body function, it is naturally produced in the body. Warfarin Sodium is known as Coumadin in the U. S. and blood thinners help with high blood pressure. Opioids aid in pain relief. Iron and many other heavy metals are vital for human function. Benzodiazepines help anxiety. Organophosphates are good for killing insects. Calcium Channel blockers and Beta blockers are also used for blood pressure. Sources: 1. Lippincott's Illustrated Reviews "Pharmacology" 4th Edition 2. My class notes These are all examples of ways in which poison is good for us. I thank my opponent for supporting my point in saying that many poisons are indeed good for you. However, I must emphasize that my opponent should be trying to argue that "Poison is bad for you" as he is the "Pro" side. If he continues to bring up points that help my side, I won't have much to say.
Posion is bad for you

Thank you for debating again: 1. There are many poison near you like Poison/Drug paracetamol (acetaminophen) vitamin K anticoagulants, e.g. warfarin opioids iron (and other heavy metals) benzodiazepines methanol cyanide Organophosphates Magnesium Calcium Channel Blockers (Verapamil, Diltiazem) Beta-Blockers (Propranolol, Sotalol) Isoniazid Atropine 2. There are stuff like food poisoning 3. Some people also drink alcohol 4. There can even be radiation poisoning I await my opponet's rebuttal
Posion is bad for you

My opponent's contention is that poison is bad for you. I will now state situations in which poison is not necessarily bad for you, but is good for you. . http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com... poison /poiï¿½son/ (poizï¿½'n) a substance that, on ingestion, inhalation, absorption, application, injection, or development within the body, in relatively small amounts, may cause structural damage or functional disturbance. poiï¿½sonous For the purposes of this debate, we shall use this definition of poison from the medical dictionary. As such, please note that poison is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, it simply causes damage or functional disturbance. FACT: All drugs are poisons. My opponent has stated this himself, so we take it to be inarguable fact. This does not just include narcotics like cocaine and heroin, but also Claritin, Tylenol, Advil, etc. Suffice to say, we use many of these poisons (which cause functional disturbance) to disturb an already present disturbance! Let's take the example of Lidocaine . http://www.medicinenet.com... Lidocaine, when injected, causes structural and functional disturbance to your nerve cells. However, it is used to numb an area so that one does not feel pain. Perhaps when they undergo a simple surgical procedure like a root canal. Meclizine Hydrochloride, aka Dramamine II is a poison that impacts your body's specific histamine receptors, that's bad right? Not necessarily. It blocks the histamine receptor associated with the emesis reflex (aka vomiting). Thus, although you are causing a functional disturbance to your body, it is a disturbance that is good if you are flying long distance and tend to get airsick. Loratidine, aka Claritin, is also an antihistamine that blocks histamine receptors of your cells in general. This is used to prevent allergic reactions to things like pollen and pet dander, even though it is blocking a natural body process. Thus, my opponent is wrong when he says that poisons are bad. Poisons are not always bad, they are sometimes good. Very good. I look forward to my opponent's response. Thank you.
school should start later

Students who begin school earlier have more time for after-school jobs and activities; schools may benefit by saving some money; and parents might find that an early start works better with their schedules. Also with the growing problem of childhood obesity, children who participate in outdoor activities and sports get the exercise they need and develop habits that can help them avoid this problem and keep themselves physically fit. This is according to http://www.sheknows.com.... Also it is the child's responsibility to go to bed early enough to get a good amount of sleep because if children sleep in because they know that they can stay up later they might spend their time at night at parties or doing things that are not good for them such as drugs or alcohol. Plus building up the habit of getting up early enough is good for when children grow up and they have to get to work at a certain time or be somewhere early.
school should start later

It is scientifically proven that kids learn better when they are well rested, and could do better to reach their full potential and may get in trouble less at school. Kids will not be late for school and will do better on tests and pay better attention to their lessons. Many children do not get a full 8.5 to 9.5 hours of rest, pediatricians have cited multiple risks of lack of sleep including higher obesity rates and depression. recent large scale studies also show risks of potential chronic tiredness.
The Abrahamic God Does Not Exist

Thank you for starting this debate. I accept. Most myths are made up. However, real events are what sparks up mythical stories. What I am saying is religions may be myths but they are based off real events. Therefore the Abrahamic God may not be as claimed but the story and the deity can be actual.I look forward to seeing Pros evidence showing that the Abrahamic God does not exist. BOP is upon Pro. GL.
Torvald is not back

To answer your bonus question, it is around a buck an ear. In the comments section, you pretty much agreed that you are THE Torvald and for the opening statement you made, you said "I, Torvald" which basically gives the idea that you pretty much are Torvald the formerly missing. To add on, the only way to log in to another person's account is by giving a gmail and password both which should be unknown to anybody but the owner him/herself. 5 years is a long time by the way, so if Torvald has indeed disappeared 5 years ago, the gadget that he used would have been old and corroded and thrown away so you can't tell me he didn't log out. This way, it all sums up to the fact that YOU are Torvald. Still with the wit though. You definitely are Torvald
Torvald is not back

Yeah like I said in the comments, there isn't really a way for me, Torvald, to prove that I, Torvald, am not back. But if I really wanted to wriggle and try to escape my inevitable fate here are some points that I could make: A) There is no way to verify that the person using this account now is the original Torvald; I might be using the Torvald account but I might be someone else, not Torvald. B) Whether I were or were not Torvald, the account may have never been 'gone', only inactive, in that I could have logged on to my account on a daily basis and perused the website without contributing (this is the most worthless point that can be made). C) Some users may still recall, though probably not, a debate from a few years back in which I was recognised as having proved, from a materialist standpoint, that as a 'person' is an entity composed of a series of complex chemical and electrochemical reactions which bears a mantle of identity but at any given point is comprised of different physical materials than they previous have been, and thus is at no given point the same 'person' as previously: if we are to accept this as still true, then I am Torvald but not the Torvald who used the account before nor the Torvald who wrote the opening sentences of the debate, thus Torvald cannot be back because Torvald ceased to exist as soon as he ceased to be the same combination of materials. Obviously this is a debate for fun more than a dazzling battle of wits (though you can dazzle me if you want to), but if I wanted to wax philosophical those are probably the points I would make, and if you, the con, wanted to also feel somewhat satisfied about this debate, you could try to refute them (though admittedly it's not enough rounds for a philosophical debate, probably not even for a satisfying debate). Not related but do you know how much a pirate pays for earrings?
Torvald is not back

There is hardly a known way that an account can be removed unless by staff. This way even if someone has been offline for a long time, the account will be still there only not showing any recent activity. Just in case there were any more "Torvalds" I did a search on the name of Torvald and I found only the person who has made this debate less than 6 days ago. Checked his account and he was active in other debates as well. I have come to the conclusion that the person who i am debating against is indeed Torvald and he is, if he even vanished, back. If, in advance, Torvald is would like to say that "Torvald" dissappeared 5 years ago, then I would like to remind him that this debate is not about whether he vanished for 5 years but whether or not, after vanishing, Torvald is back. Overall, my point in a nutshell basically states that my opponent is Torvald and the fact that he is now reading this argument and is about to propose his argument proves the Torvald is indeed "back".
Torvald is not back

Torvald was a notorious member of the Debate.org community around five years ago, but then one day he vanished without a trace. Now there are rumours Torvald may have returned. Either Torvald has returned, or Torvald has not returned. It will be the role of the pro to demonstrate or establish that Torvald has not returned. It will be the role of the con to demonstrate or establish that Torvald has returned.
Can Bohemian Rhapsody be considered the "Greatest song of all time?"

You did in fact completely disregard my strongest points. My question clearly stated "Can bohemian rhapsody be Considered the greatest song of all time" so actually in fact anybody who tries to fight against this argument is incorrect because any song can be considered the greatest of all time, so in turn just because it does not hit #1 in every aspect of the music critic based world does not automatically disapprove of it as not being able to be considered the greatest of all time, I know statistically there is not 1 song that could possibly top every chart and list that includes statistics of some sort so if was to argue that i couldn't which in turn makes some of your arguments irrelevant. And also I don't get what it is with your ego but trying to make points such as my analysis was pointless something like that you can keep to your mean spirited self. But truly I do understand that I am losing a fighting battle by not including the best selling single ever as the greatest of all time, even though it can only be considered as "the most purchased single of all time" but yes this is a very hard issue to argue, but truly in my heart I believe that bohemian rhaposdy is really just an amazing thing, it's one of those songs that really changed music and gave artists and people inspiration, and the fact that it was sung by "the greatest frontman of all time" and crafted together to become a music staple and masterpiece that is something you can't argue. Logically I understand your point of the argument but bohemian rhaposdy is just too important to music itself.
Can Bohemian Rhapsody be considered the "Greatest song of all time?"

"everything debated ever is based solely off opinions"Yes but whether or not something is right or not is NOT based solely off of opinions, which is exactly what your argument consists entirely of, opinions. "And I would like to think my line to line dissection wasn't pointless"Well you can think that but it would be stupid of you to do so..... Your 'dissection' was completely worthless and simply a waste of anyone who even read your analysis's time...... Sorry to break it to you."I can understand what you're saying but statistics really has nothing to prove with the quality of a song."It kinda does though...... A song cant be the greatest song of all time if all the evidence in the world shows that the vast majority of people prefer different songs as their favorite and that a vast majority of people dont even buy the song in the first place. "music is based on the quality and the richness of its sound and message"When youre done with substituting your bs opinion as fact based on no evidence at all, let me know. "I also find interesting that you say that since it never won a Grammy it is not good"I said that since it never won a grammy it cant possibly be the greatest song of all time...... Please learn to read"As of 2004, "Bohemian Rhapsody" is the second most played song on British radio"So in a single country the song still loses to another song on what is the most played....... Thats an argument for why its not the greatest song of all time "On 30 September 2007 on the Radio 1 Chart Show, for BBC Radio 1's 40th birthday, it was revealed that "Bohemian Rhapsody" was the most played song since Radio 1's launch."One radio in one channel in one country doesnt decide what is or isnt the greatest song ever is...... "In 2012, the song topped an ITV poll in the UK......."Can you please give evidence of the song's greatness that isnt based out of England?"The song also has been included to RadioMafia's list of "Top 500 Songs" and it took place at number 5"Which means that there are four songs better than it, meaning its not the greatest song of all time......"In 2000 it came second to"Second = Not first = not greatest of all time."And please sir do not use statistics to argue a point about music"Just because statistics completely blow your argument out of the water it doesnt mean they dont count..... All my points showing that Bohemian Rhapsody is clearly not the greatest song of all time are valid since it actually shows and gives evidence that the song is not the greatest of all time. Extend all dropped arguments
Can Bohemian Rhapsody be considered the "Greatest song of all time?"

Sorry it took so long, internet at UM has been completely non-existent due to storm problems.... Anyways, Pro's argument for why its the best song of all time is based entirely on his own opinion, which can be applied to just about every good song ever made to make it seem like the best ever. He then spends his entire first round giving a bullsh** line by line dissection of the song which leads us to nowhere. The only tangible proof/numbers used to calculate what the best song is varies, but no matter how you measure it, Bohemian Rhapsody isnt even close to being the best ever. 1 - When you look at the best-selling singles of all time, Bohemian Rhapsody doesnt even make the top 100 http://en.wikipedia.org... 2 - When you look at the critical reception of the song itself when it was released, it was FAR from universal acclaim. In fact a lot of critics thought the song sucked http://en.wikipedia.org... 3 - It didnt win a single Grammy Award for anything, which is one of th estaples that really defines whether a song is even good or not. The fact that B.H. was only nominated for TWO and LOST BOTH of them strongly implies that its not even close to being the greatest song of all time. 4 - In 2002 a poll in Britain, BH only came in TENTH for best song (theres an a**load of other polls where the song didnt come close to being in the top ten, let alone number 1) http://news.bbc.co.uk... So basically, BH falls FAR short of being the best song of all time, if anything its the song of the 1970's.
Can Bohemian Rhapsody be considered the "Greatest song of all time?"

"....... any song can be considered the greatest of all time"Stop. It is certainly not true that any song can be considered the greatest of all time..... In fact anyone who thinks that anything ever made by Nicki Minaj or Bieber can be considered the greatest song of all time deserves to be castrated with a baseball bat with a live porcupine duct-taped to it. "statistically there is not 1 song that could possibly top every chart and list that includes statistics of some sort so if was to argue that i couldn't which in turn makes some of your arguments irrelevant"No it doesnt dingus, it only means that its impossible for any song to be considered the greatest of all time."trying to make points such as my analysis was pointless something like that you can keep to your mean spirited self."Your pointless and stupid a** analysis is relevant to the debate since it was a pointless and stupid a** analysis. "truly in my heart I believe that bohemian rhaposdy is really just an amazing thing"Thats perfectly fine though...... Bohemian Rhapsody is an amazing song and I listen to it once in a while too.... Its just that its not even close to being the greatest song of all time, which is what I am arguing here, and all evidence supports this.
My life is worse than my opponents

Okay, no new major arguments...I guess I can't tell you about how my aunt loves boxing practice and is beating me up to death XD...so any how to conclude this debate... Sh!t vs coffee And the cardboard boxes are closed, so the mice can't get in, they crawl all over me and use me as a vest for the traps so You at least get to spit some of it out, I have to drink all the one gallon of coffee. they can't get hurts. As for writing utensils, at least you have fingers to write with. Hey, I have to use my feet, and I'm punished for every single mistake I make. And who says I get to decide when my 10 seconds are? It's usually when everyone is sleeping at the end of the day too! In conclusion... -I'm chased by 2 government agencies and used as a vest for my mother when the government agents come in and start stabbing and shooting everywhere -My bed is worse than my opponent's bed -I can't even use my hands while my opponent still has them -I have to roll around to "Walk" -I run miles and miles for practice, mush worse than my opponent's walking just a few miles -All the crime community despises me but loves my sisters -My food is worse than my opponent's, eating waste is not so bad as contaminating your body with spores and poison while slowly dying -My restroom time is just as bad, if not worse than my opponent's -Playing violin for 10 hours then piano for 10 hours ( Both instruments are broken, and if I make one mistake it's whip time!) is worse than living on a cotton plantation My life is definitely worse than my opponent's. Vote me.
My life is worse than my opponents

1. Access to actual foodDo you think poisonous mushrooms are actual food?? They are sporing through my stomach as I type this up. I'm slowly...dying...everything...blurry....2. A roof over his [my] headWho said anything about the warehouse having a roof? It is patched up with loads of rags and holes, and I have to patch up the new warehouse every time we move.3. A bed of some sortIt's not even a sturdy bed at all...it can collapse at any time and I can fall upon the mouse traps, which I have to get off of me and back into position before my parents find out.4. Access to pencil and paperIncorrect. It's pen and paper. Every time I make a mistake on my essay I have to get stepped all over by my family, and spanked until my butt and hands look as red as the blood spurring out of my hands and butt.5. A piano and viol[i]nBut they're broken, so I can't play correctly.... :(6. Time to use a bathroomMy opponent has access to a bathroom as well (at the end of the day).7. Access to a computor You have access to computer too...Pee and sh!t vs coffeeYou obviously don't know how horrid pure coffee is. Besides, at least you get to spit out all your stuff while I have to swallow down the whole darn gallon of coffee. In order to write his response my opponent writes in blood by pricking his finger....You're lucky you have fingers, my fingers are all broken from playing so much piano, I have to use my feet to type all of this up. And keep in mind every time we move while my family gets to get on the car there's no room for me so I have to run those 50 miles....My opponent fails to kill himself:Please, you at least get the chance to. One of my sisters is a psychic and can tell when I want to suicide, so she tells mom, and mom just crushes me with a giant wrecking ball and forces me to kneel down for the rest of the day on hard cement while I play the broken piano or violin and keep on getting whipped for my mistakes. The book your parents wrote:Well, your parents certainly worry about you enough to write a book. My parents just show off my amazing sisters in their crime book published to the mafia world, revered by most of those murderers and malicious masterminds, while even the lowest ranking theives laugh at me and throw bones and trash cans every time I get in their sight.My opponent is lucky he can still walk. After that 50 miles and typing this all up, I can't really walk any more. I just roll around lamely while slowly torturing my hip bones and muscles. Don't mention those jumping excercises my mom uses by throwing barrels like Donkey Kong so to practice when we escape, we jump over the agents...I don't know how that works, we always run away instead of jumping to the agents...she forces me to do it anyways. Every time I fail...well, let's just say there's gonna be a fire incident. D:I don't think I will survive next round. My aunt is coming to visit...you'll see.