Jesus cannot be divine for he himself has confessed he cannot tell the future

Biblically speaking, there is a specific inherent ability one must possess in order to be considered a true God. Furthermore this one ability just spoken of actually distinguishes the true God of the Bible from all the other gods in the universe. This one ability which makes a god truly divine is the ability of being able to foretell future events with dead on accuracy. Jesus cannot be a divine God, but must rather be considered a type of demigod for he himself has completely denied the ability to be able to inherently predict future events. I want to start proving all these assertions by reading the following verses where the true God reveals below that He is able to predict the future and that this ability of His to foretell the future is what clearly separates Him from all other gods: Isa 41:23 Shew the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods: yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together. In the above the "God of Israel" is the one who is speaking (Isa 41:17), but just to make sure there is no doubt as to who is speaking in the above text, let"s turn to another portion of Isa which gives us two names of this God who is able to predict future events: Isa 48:1 Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, which swear by the name of the LORD, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness. Isa 48:2 For they call themselves of the holy city, and stay themselves upon the God of Israel; The LORD of hosts is his name. Isa 48:3 I have declared the former things from the beginning; and they went forth out of my mouth, and I shewed them; I did them suddenly, and they came to pass. So who is "the God of Israel" and "the Lord of hosts" as spoken of in the above verses who claims to be able to inherently foretell the future? Is it Jesus? If you say yes, I must conclude that you do not know your Bible very well, for "the Lord of hosts" and "the God of Israel" above is the Father of Christ (and of all of us Christians as well). I will now move into the NT in order to prove that the above God who can predict the future, "the Lord of hosts", "the God of Israel" is indeed the Father. First off in the NT Jesus himself has told us in plain English that he does not even know the time of his coming as seen in two places Mt 24:36 and Mk 13:32. This inability of his to foretell the future events certainly is not a quality of true Divinity is it? So based upon what Jesus clearly confessed in Mt 24:36 and Mk 13:32 of not being able to foretell even the hour of his coming, who then can be the true God of Isa 41:23 and 48:1-3, is it Christ? Jesus cannot be "the Lord of hosts" and "the God of Israel" spoken of in Isa 41:23 and Isa 48:1-3 above, for not only has Jesus denied being able to tell us the hour of his coming in the future, but he has clearly revealed the name of the true God who is able to actually tell the future events and this God is the Father as seen in Acts 1:7 below: Act 1:7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. As we have already seen from Isa, a true deity must be able to predict the future inherently (Isa 41:23 and Isa 48:1-3), this gift cannot be given to him otherwise we could then conclude that all the prophets of the Bible (and all time) such as Isaiah and Jeremiah are truly divine, for these gentlemen foretold the destruction of Israel with accuracy did they not? However, what we are seeing in the above verses is that Christ himself is utterly refuting the ability to know the future on his own power. As the reader can now deduce for himself based upon the above texts alone we have just studied , the God of Isa 41:23 and Isa 48:1-3 "the Lord of hosts" and "the God of Israel", who is able to accurately predict the future must indeed be the Father. Yet there are some at this point who will resist this claim and assert that Jesus only denied being able to tell the future as seen in the above NT verses, simply because he was in his human form. Well, this would be quite a stretch! For let"s remember that just before Christ had confessed what he did in Acts 1:7 above, he had also told his disciples that: Mat 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Yet it is clear from what we have already studied that "all power" had not been given to him, that is, at least the power to inherently foretell the future of which makes a god a true divine God. For we read that well after Christ had ascended and had been glorified by the Father (Acts 3:13) and his face shown like the sun (Rev 1:14-16), he came back to John on Patmos and revealed yet once again to humanity that he is still unable, even in his glorified state, to predict the future on his own power, for we read in Rev 1:1 the following: Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, WHICH GOD GAVE UNTO HIM, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John: (CAPITALIZATION IN ABOVE VERSE MY EMPHASIS) Therefore, unless the readers can offer me stronger evidence contrary to what has been given above. Showing Jesus claimed somewhere in the Bible to have the inherent ability to foretell the future as a God must be able to do in order to be considered a true God, I must conclude the following: that Christ is not a divine God. Now if this is true that Christ is not a divine God then we can also correctly conclude as well that the doctrines of the Trinity, Tri-theism, Bi-theism, and Modalism are all indeed false doctrines. That in fact there is only one true God as Christ himself has told us there is as is seen in John 17:3, and that is the Father! One last thing, before you pick up this argument, I ask that you to declare what doctrine of God you believe in. Are you a classic Trinitarian? Do you believe in Modalism or Tri-theism? If you are a Trinitarian you cannot simply merge the so called "personalities of the godhead" as you call them, when it suits your doctrine. The Bible clearly separates the Father from Christ as from the angels etc. If you use OT or NT Bible verses we must look in the direct context of those verses and define what the name of the God is who is speaking in them. We cannot logically just take verses here and there and simply ignore the name of the deity that is speaking in them. Do we not need to follow the rule of "context is king"?