There Are No Reasonable Arguments for a God

Yes, but returning back to my point of our three dimensional view of the world and linear perception of the fourth dimension, with at least 11 dimensions in total, we could argue that the universe did not begin at one point, unless we're considering it from our own personal three dimensional observation. What we can see is that existence itself transcends time. There is no fixed point of beginning, but all conceivable points. Everything, not just matter, exists in tandem with one another. Referring back to the human race and, if we accept that we are the intelligence of the universe, we have to assume where we will be in a thousand or billion years. Will there be a fixed point where our knowledge will stop? Will we finally know everything? If we do then we will assume, based on my argument, that we will be all knowing and, as such, God will be all knowing, as he is existence. You could argue that, based on this fixed point in time, we are not and, therefore, God is not, but that would be assuming it from our limited perception of existence. My definition of God is already all omnipotent, as seen with the laws of science. They came from nothing and we cannot break them. My definition of God is omnipresent. Existence transcends matter and time. The final question is if he is omniscient. If we accept that humankind can guarantee its own survival as a species and advance to a stage where we do know everything about our universe and, perhaps beyond, then existence is already all knowing, just not in regards to our own perception of it. You could argue that this is the fatal flaw on my position, as it suggests that one would have to have faith that our species will reach that point. However, I would argue that it is the responsibility of intelligent life, as it always has been, to define what God is. If we assume the basis of my argument, then existence is also objectively perfect and, as such, so are we. We cannot be changed outside the laws of science and despite chance, we are here and we are meant to be, because we are. If our world ends, then it was meant to be and the religions of the world will find their justifications with the end of days. If we can establish a guaranteed future, then we will also have the chance to show God is all knowing when we are. I suppose, at the end of the day, you will need to have a faith in science. However, I am still arguing my point on your terms of what God is. I do not wish to push the 'definition argument', but we assume intelligence from a derivative of our own intelligence. Intelligence is different from fly to lion, lion to human. The "intelligence" of God, or existence, would not be restricted by belief, choice, free will, ideology and any other construct imaginable. It would not be able to imagine, because it would be the truth. No doubt I am sounding like an Enlightenment philosophe at this stage, but the fact remains that we are here and although I may be pushing the point of a deistic God, it is only a deistic God (I assume that is uncaring) if we allow it be the case. The fact of the matter is, is that we are an aspect of that God and, therefore, we have a say in deciding what that God is, as we have done so for thousands of years.