God is an Interventionist in Modern Times.

Funny thing is that I don't even believe in an intervening God of any kind (I'm a Deist) but I can understand the logic a devout theist may use in this situation. I know I don't meet the stated requirement but I don't see why that should matter if I play the role of the required individual.If we assume that this reality is controlled by a God that is capable of any and all powerful feats of absolutely any kind then the question of the debate is: Does God truly intervene in modern times to an extent which confirms him beyond reasonable doubt to live up to his reputation?If I have misinterpreted this debate then I do apologise but I shall be answering 'yes' to that question and explaining exactly the ways in which God intervenes in reality, not only today but from the beginning of our world (and all worlds before that).God exists an an omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient being. (http://www.sermoncentral.com...) One could even go on to say that God must be omnibenevolent to truly be a moral authority (for if it wasn't omnibenevolent it would be a hypocrite to its own regime).There is a fundamental key to understanding why 'bad' things happen in a world that the authority controlling what is 'good' created. This fundamental key is realising that God is indeed an entity of not just double standards but multi-standards. Thus, if I can prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that God has different standards for different types of beings, then this gives me sufficient grounds to propose that the code of conduct God considers himself to have to adhere to is different to the code of conduct that common humans must adhere to. This means that when God does something that may considered immoral for a human to do, it is not immoral for him to do because his code of conduct is different to ours.I will now quote the Bible (combining both Old and New Testament) to prove that God has different standards for different beings. Once I've proven this with sufficient evidence, I shall then progress to the next stage of my case for the resolution. Matthew 6:26 - Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...]This indicates that God is willing to feed a bird for no hard labour but that he supports humans having to work hard to get food for themselves. It actually directly displays one of many double-standards God holds between different creatures. Exodus 20:24 - An altar of earth thou shalt make unto me, and shalt sacrifice thereon thy burnt offerings, and thy peace offerings, thy sheep, and thine oxen: in all places where I record my name I will come unto thee, and I will bless thee. [http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...]This indicates that it is actually completely okay, in fact morally superior for one to kill fellow living creature son this Earth if they are of specific species, whilst it would be totally immoral and against God's will to kill others (especially humans because this would constitute murder which is against one of the ten commandments). Genesis 3:16 - Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. [http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...]This indicates that to God, women automatically deserve a tougher way of life purely due to the actions of one woman named Eve which they had no control over. Yet this is Old Testament and therefore God's original wording of his own morality through the mouths of the prophets that spoke it. Matthew 10:24 - The disciple is not above [his] master, nor the servant above his lord. [http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...]This is direct evidence that God never designed all humans to be equal to one another and actively supports inequality both economically and socially. In short, there is clear evidence in the bible that God doesn't hold the same code of morality or give the same conditions to all beings, and not even to all people. So it is not beyond reasonable doubt that this same God is intervening right here today and rather than helping everyone reach equality he, instead, is responsible for the inequality across the Earth as we know it and actually favours this over a world where everyone is equal and following the same code of morality and considering each other of equal value and status. It is no secret that the proponents of Communism were all secular in faith. Not just Stalin (http://freethoughtpedia.com...) but Marx and Lenin too [http://en.wikipedia.org...] (and basically all of them). There is a clear opposition between the adherents of God and those that believe in equality for all mankind. Thus, it can be assumed the God actually himself enforces and adores the existence of poverty for, to him, this does not contradict any of the original morals he expressed in his bible since none of them apply to him, only to humans and perhaps some animals also.A second point to consider is that God made all of us unique and different and thus to test everyone's faith fairly would require a totally different test for each and every one of us. He already explained that he intentionally makes the test for women slightly harder via childbirth and labor pains due to the sin of Eve eating the apple and has almost an entirely different test for each species of animal so isn't it sensible to conclude that he may also have a different test for not just every social circle and class in society but every individual in this world as well? Would this not explain why the hardships of one never fully equate to another because the souls and bodies are not at all equal in the first place so to test both fairly requires a different test. God is not necessarily scientific in his approach, for he doesn't test to find the answer (he's omniscient and already knows if you will fail or pass the tests of faith he throws at you) perhaps he intervenes as and where he sees necessary, if not all the time, just because he is bored and, as an author must explore his story in depth to fully complete it, our world is one of many works that God has imagined and wants to see through to the end, however ugly and harsh it may seem to the characters in the story, this story was written by an all knowing entity and so therefore must have been written full thought-out beforehand so as to achieve his idea of a perfect tale.On a final note, God's level of understanding and the way he uses his power are, by definition, beyond human intellect. Thus, the argument that the way he is intervening doesn't make sense by human means of reasoning isn't, in itself a sufficient rebuttal by the Con against this resolution. To successfully oppose the resolution would require Con to sufficiently prove that the way the world is working actually contradicts the philosophies that God has verbally expressed in the ideas of the Bible.In summary, God doesn't hold the same standards for himself as he holds for other beings, indicated by how readily he differentiates the standards for different beings in the Bible, itself. Also, God has a different plan for all of us and designs the test of faith to perfectly match who we are. Last, but by no means least, God isn't functioning on a level comprehensible by human brain. He is operating a level far above our intellect so to try to make sense of it would be ultimately futile even if he was operating sensibly.