I want to debate whether Jesus is the God of the Bible.

Your argument isn't clear, but I'll attempt to explain why it doesn't apply to the Trinity. The idea of baptizing people in the name of... This doesn't mean they all share the same name as if they are all Jehovah. This statement is made in recognition of the significance and authority of all three. If they were all the same there would be no need to differentiate between them. The Father is God, Jehovah, the creator of all things and the principle authority that sent Jesus. The Son is the representative sent by God who preached of God's kingdom and eventually delivered his life to redeem mankind. The Holy Spirit bears witness to the legitimacy of the baptism through the miracles and powerful works. This is to emphasize the role each has plays in discipleship. This has nothing to do with the three being one. To further explain just read Matthew 21:19-27. The Pharisees asked Jesus by what authority did he perform his works. Jesus responded by asking, "by what authority did John baptize people." Jesus knew that those wicked leaders did not respect God, or the works of the Holy spirit through Jesus. So he gave no answer because those men would not recognize the testimony of God or the Holy spirit. Christians are baptized in recognition of the authority or NAME of all three and the role they play in discipleship. Again it has nothing to do with the trinity. As for Colossians, this "Godhead" translation is not accurate. Liddell and Scott"s Greek-English Lexicon defines the"oE7;tes in this scripture in basically the same way it does thei"oE7;tes, as meaning "divinity, divine nature." (P. 792) The Syriac Peshitta and the Latin Vulgate render this word as "divinity." A consideration of the context of Colossians 2:9 clearly shows that having "divinity," or "divine nature," does not make Christ the same as God the Almighty. In the preceding chapter, Paul says: "God saw good for all fullness to dwell in him." (Col 1:19) Thus, all fullness dwells in Christ because it "pleased the Father" (KJ, Dy), because it was "by God"s own choice." (NE) So the fullness of "divinity" that dwells in Christ is his as a result of a decision made by the Father. Further showing that having such "fullness" does not make Christ the same person as Almighty God is the fact that Paul later speaks of Christ as being "seated at the right hand of God."R03;"Col 3:1. The Idea that Christ is GOD is directly contradicted by all the scriptures surrounding it. Applying the trinity to this scriptures does not harmonize with the rest of the book of Colossians. Therefore equating Jesus to GOD is incorrect. Furthermore, There is one Final new point I'd like to make before summarizing everything as to why the Trinity is false and it concerns Jesus, the Messiah, as King and one of your original points. PLEASE READ 1 Corinthians 15:24 - 28. After his resurrection to Heaven Christ does indeed become the King of God's Kingdom, but when we arrive at verse 24 JESUS GIVES THE KINGDOM BACK TO GOD. If Jesus is himself God then these scriptures are a contradiction unto itself. But this isn't the case. We have two distinct individuals transferring a kingship from one authority to another; From Jesus to Jehovah. And then Jesus subjects HIMSELF to his GOD. Jesus bows out and steps down so that in the end GOD is everything to everyone. Which means that in the end after all is said and done and Jesus has completed his assignment as King of GOD's kingdom GOD will take the kingship back, away from Jesus, and do it himself. This exchange is possible because THERE IS NO TRINITY. Jesus is a remarkable person. He was the firstborn of all creation. Think about how long the two of them spent alone together before any universe, before any angels, before heaven even existed. Maybe it was billions of years. But Jesus would have become so intimately acquainted with his father. Jesus would have known God the best. He would have also resembled his personality the most. And after all the pain he went through on our behalf Jesus is definitely worthy of so much praise. But Jesus is not God. Jesus spent his earthly ministry trying to instruct people about the truth of GOD from the scriptures. He made it clear that he was THE SON of his father and that he was the best suited to explain who the father was. And I have attempted to make it clear to you: That Jesus regarded himself in an inferior position to God, That the name Jesus is derived from Jehovah in describes Jehovah's abilities as superior, That the scriptures say that NO MAN has seen God and yet people have seen Jesus, That the ransom sacrifice of Jesus to redeem us from sin requires that he not be God, that historical and religious studies of the trinity doctrine proves that the idea that Jesus being God is not founded on scriptural truths, that in the end Jesus will give the Kinship over to God and subject himself to the one Jesus worships, GOD. The scriptures you have provided throughout this debate have been easily defeated by either reference to the original Greek or by reference to the scriptures context in relation to the scriptures immediately around it in chapter, book, or overarching context of the Bible in its entirety. I have stressed that scripture must harmonize with other scripture and have repeatedly shown how your understanding of the verses in question fail to do this. In turn I have provided more reasonable explanations of the scriptures that harmonize in logical agreement with the rest of the Bible. I have proven that throughout the scriptures it is overwhelmingly shown that Jesus is not God. I have also shown more than the usual professionalism in this debate despite your unwillingness or inability to refute a single one of my points. Just as well, I have shown more care and attention to my arguments than you have. Whether you change your mind is up to you, but it is clear that I have won this debate.