The lord our god is NOT one lord according to the bible therefore everything god is, is false

The subject of the debate, when saying, 'The lord our god is NOT one lord', seems to allude to Deuteronomy 6:4. In a Hebrew interlinear, this is: 'sema yisrael; Yahweh elohenu Yahweh ehad.' The Hebrew itself isn't so much the point as that the use of God's name seems to clarify the point it's making - that it isn't making a claim about how many gods there are, as such. That is to say, Yahweh is one Yahweh - he is not, for example, part of some trinity, he wasn't some collective godhead - a point that needed stating to the Israelites who had just come out of Egypt where there were various trinities and such things. Even if you were right about there being many gods like him, this scripture, the titular claim of the debate, would not be contradicted. However, I will nevertheless show that though the word 'god' can be used of other beings, they are not like Yahweh (or Jehovah, Yahewah, Jahveh, whichever English transliteration of the Hebrew is used). It's surprising to start out with a scripture that Jesus himself pointed out the meaning of. The first scripture you quote is Psalm 82:1, which speaks poetically of those appointed as judges, appointed to represent God, hence why it goes on to criticise them for their corruption, and speak of how they will die for it. Verse 6 says, 'I said, 'You are gods', with reference to God having appointed them to that position (if they were literal gods they wouldn't need telling that that's what they were!) - and Jesus quoted this Psalm in John 10:34-36: Jesus said to them, "Don't your Scriptures say, 'I said, "You are gods"'? The Scriptures cannot be discredited. So if God calls people gods (and they are the people to whom he gave the Scriptures), why do you say that I'm dishonoring God because I said, 'I'm the Son of God'?" (God's Word Translation) Jesus specifically points out the correct understanding of this scripture - the 'gods' spoken of in Psalm 82 were people, the people to whom that scripture was directed, not literal gods. While there are unique things about Jesus, he isn't the only one referred to as a son of God. Adam is also referred to that way (Luke 3:38), and in Genesis 6:2, we see that there are others. Indeed, I think it's fairly common knowledge that angels are referred to throughout the Bible - the next reference that springs to mind is the angels that visited Abraham, and there is certainly a speech about a conversation between God and his angels at 2 Chronicles 22, and the book of Job starts off with an account of a meeting taking place between God and all his angels (and Satan). So I'm not sure why you would be surprised by God's use of plural pronouns. Of whom was he speaking when he used words like 'we' and us'? Well, maybe all his angels, maybe just a few (like in Genesis 18), maybe just himself and one other - maybe just himself and Jesus. There isn't that much you can infer from a plural pronoun, but it isn't news to a Christian that there were other beings around with whom God could communicate. Now whether these are other 'gods' is a largely semantic dispute - it basically depends on whether you choose definitions for 'god' and 'angel' that have a certain amount of overlap. We have already seen that humans can be referred to as gods, so the scriptures can certainly refer to angels in the same way, for the same reasons. The crucial points still remain, that these beings are subordinate to Yahweh and inferior to him. (Well, not all subordinate in the sense of obedient - there are Satan and others who are rebellious, but that isn't relevant right now.) This point even Jesus acknowledged, being himself in that set of beings, or 'gods' if you like, inferior to Yahweh. He acknowledged that he himself had a god. "I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God." - John 20:17 (KJV) "the Father is greater than I" - John 14:28 (ASV) His disciples recognized this about him too, that Jesus had a God just as they did - the same one. "I keep asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious Father, may give you the Spirit of wisdom" - Ephesians 1:17 (NIV) In light of what's already been pointed out, your quoted scriptures from Part II could easily be argued to be simply making that same point - that God is above anyone else like Jesus or the angels (or indeed, Satan and any who follow him). But given that several of them are part of songs (in Psalms), and one of them specifically makes its comparison to gods "in heaven above or on earth beneath", it is also possible they are making comparison to the imaginary gods people believe in. The Bible does this a lot - it was the whole point of the test on Mt. Carmel, for instance. Why was a bull prepared for Yahweh and one for Baal if not to make a comparison between the two of them? And yet, the point it seems to make is that whereas Yahweh was real, Baal was imaginary - as Elijah somewhat aggressively pointed out to those praying to Baal: "At noon Elijah started making fun of them: "Pray louder! He is a god! Maybe he is day-dreaming or relieving himself, or perhaps he's gone off on a trip! Or maybe he's sleeping, and you've got to wake him up!"" - 1 Kings 18:27 (GNT) Likewise, Isaiah 44:13-18 (a bit long to quote) tells the story of someone who chops down a tree - half the wood he burns as fuel, but half of it he makes into an idol, and calls it his god. The chapter points out how foolish this is, and that clearly this man's god has no more power to save him than the wood he'd burned did. It then points out how much better it is to rely on Yahweh, with all that he has done, (pointed out in verse 24). Clearly, such comparisons do get made, and this scripture is not questioning whether the god to which Yahweh is here compared is an imaginary one - in fact, it emphasizes that point. With all that said, let us finish by considering the meanings of monotheism and polytheism in common parlance, by just looking at the opening sentences of the two Wikipedia articles on Monotheism and Polytheism: "Monotheism has been defined as the belief in the existence of only one god that created the world, is all-powerful and intervenes in the world." "Polytheism ... is the worship of or belief in multiple deities, which are usually assembled into a pantheon of gods and goddesses, along with their own religions and rituals." Note that part of the common understanding of monotheism is to believe in one God that is all-powerful - the existence of other powerful spiritual beings less powerful than that God does not contradict this definition, that's common to the majority of monotheistic religions, most of them have a concept of angels for instance. Further, part of polytheism is having a variety of deities that you worship - to believe these other entities exist but that only one should be worshipped again falls under the definition of monotheism. So none of the scriptures you have shown suggest Christianity to be polytheistic.