god persecutes gays, Blasphemers, Adulterers, Those that work on the sabbath, Don't worship him etc

You: "So then by stating this, It simply means that you do not have the ability to think, Rationalize, Reason, Use common sense, Nor use logic on your own. Its also clear that your god, In which you believe in, Also does not have these abilities. " Me: Can you please explain how what I said means I do not have the ability to think, Rationalize, Reason, Use common sense, Or use logic on my own? I said, "As to whether God exists, Or to why he doesn't use texts (a very strange argument), I will not respond to them simply because God can neither be moral nor immoral if he does not exist. " This is quite obviously an example of thinking and rationalizing. You: "'I am easily confused by such long passages, ' THEN WHY DO YOU BELIEVE? Yeah. There's absolutely no reason why you should since this is ---especially--- true. " Me: When I said I am easily confused by such long passages, I was referring to the long passage that you typed out. This has absolutely nothing to do with my reasoning for believing in God. You: "'So I will outline your argument so I can respond to it. Please let me know if I have anything wrong. ' Oh there's plenty wrong right off the bat. The questions are simple "yes" or "no" questions. They are not that hard to follow in which you utterly failed miserably thus you MUST think that YOUR god is completely immoral because YOU cannot possibly believe and state "yes" to any of the questions. Because YOU are better than that and YOU know it. AND ONLY a completely immoral, Bankrupt and corrupt thing like a whatever god as proved by the verses demanding death for god"s sake if you were to break any of those pigeon toed rules would demand such a horrifying thing. Again YOU are much better than this. So is the entire human race. " Me: I did answer these six questions, I said: "I said no to all of those questions. " If you actually took the time to read my argument, You would have known that. Besides this, I went into detail about why God's laws are not immoral. Please respond to that. You: "'That God doesn't communicate through texts? (I'd never heard this argument before until I discovered this website today)'No. Wrong. That god would not, Not for any reason, Not ever, Use text, Namely your bible, As a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible. There are at least 50 reasons why this is true. Let"s see if you can give yourself the credit that you rightly deserve and think of 5 of those reasons why your god would never use text, The worst form of communication possible. " Me: You said "No. Wrong. " What is wrong here? All I said is what you said, Which is that God doesn't communicate through texts. At the end of my argument, I said that I would not respond to this because it makes no sense. For one, You never said why text is the worst form of communication possible. Please elaborate and I will respond. You: "'Ignoring the fact that these arguments are paradoxical (how can a God that doesn't exist be immoral? ), ' That's an ignorant comment. So let"s pretend that it does not exist. And let's go with billions of people believe that the storybook god of the bible most certainly does exist and they use the very teachings, Like deliberate homicide genocide time after time after time to especially create their own specific genocide, Naturally in the name of this god time after time after time etc etc etc" Oh yeah, A belief does indeed have merit even if there is no proof for its existence and always will. " Me: Asking how a God that doesn't exist could be immoral is ignorant? That's like saying that if I said that food that hasn't been cooked yet doesn't smell good, You said I was dumb. I was simply stating facts. You: DO NOT EVER tell me that I"ve taken YOUR bible out of context when you have no idea, None, As to what you are talking about. Especially when I only ask 6 simpleton "yes" or "no" questions in which there"s only 2 ways to interpret them. That"s either "yes" or "no" for each. Me: I find how you think that taking the bible out of context is some form of insult amusing. I will say it again: You took the Bible out of context. I went into a lot of detail about this, So please respond to it. As you just said, It is my Bible, So I obviously know more about it than you do. Also, As I have already said, I did respond to those questions. Please scroll up to see what I said. You: "You"re right, Its not a debate on YOUR god"s existence. What it is, As clearly stated "Here is a test for YOUR morality to see where YOU stand with YOUR god with how he believes from what is stated directly from the bible and or torah. " It is nothing more or less. Yet you with your gibberish, You try to turn it into something else in which I most certainly will not deal with under any circumstance. So if what you say continues to fall off track, I will end the RD and that will be that and you can go from there, Respond if you like, And I can see where it goes from there, If anywhere. But make no mistake, I"m in control of this debate, You are not and you cannot take control of it. I"m far too smart for that. : Me: First, I did respond to those questions, And this is my third time saying so. Please scroll up to see what I said. Second, You say I fall off track, Yet you are the one wasting time with ad hoc fallacy calling me a "true coward. " Also, You say you're too smart to let me take control of the debate. Sorry to break it to you, But your 5. 13% win ratio says otherwise. You: "To start, Let me address what you said about God"" I didn"t say anything about god in the verses represented in RD1, Your god did. Who are you to go against his laws if you believe in this superior ego god complex in which your bible is entirely about and nothing but? Me: You called God "inane and insane, " and a lot of other stuff. Also, Who ever said that I am going against his laws? You clearly did not read any of my responses. You: "Has nothing to do with anything as christ was a false prophet. . . Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hong Xiuquan, ALL serial killers, ALL rapists, ALL pedophiles, ALL gangbangers, ALL torturers, Etc etc etc what that verse is saying unto them if they suddenly believeth in this christ storybook character, Then they are guaranteed a spot in this mythical heaven of YOURS. " Me: Can you please provide evidence that Christ was a false prophet? And no, Nothing you have said already proves that, And neither does any of those videos. Also, Can you please point me to where the Bible guarantees a spot for serial killers and friends in heaven? Hint: it doesn't. And don't call me an ignorant coward again by 'ignoring the scriptures you already said, ' because not a single one of them says anything along those lines. You: "Now me and the billions on others who have the common sense to ---never--- believe in this white trash christ, Who has never done anything wrong except for peeing on our own toilet seat occasionally, We are all to be eternally damned. Me: You have done nothing wrong? You blaspheme the name of God and Jesus multiple times, And you insult me as well. Those are both sins in the Bible and qualify you for hell just as much as serial killing or any other crime that you previously named. However, I also responded to this, And you conveniently ignored it. And I'm the ignorant one? You: "You really want to be stupid enough and get into proving YOUR christ sneezerag is false? " Me: Can you please point me to where I said Jesus Christ is false? Also, Can you get a hold on the insults? You: I don't want to waste characters, But this is just your second-to-last paragraph. Me: John 5:13 "I do not do it in contempt of the law and the sabbath, But in obedience to one who, By making me whole, Has given me an undeniable proof that he is greater than either. He that could work such a miracle as to make me whole no doubt might give me such a command as to carry my bed; he that could overrule the powers of nature no doubt might overrule a positive law, Especially in an instance not of the essence of the law. He that was so kind as to make me whole would not be so unkind as to bid me do what is sinful. "" Christ, By curing another paralytic, Proved his power to forgive sin, Here to give law; if his pardons are valid, His edicts are so, And his miracles prove both. https://www. Biblestudytools. Com/commentaries/matthew-henry-complete/john/5. Html Jesus was not breaking the law by forgiving the man of his sins, As this clearly explains. You: ". . . Yah gotta answer the 6 questions as asked in RD1 and be honest about them. Oh and btw, I 100% will know if you are lying. " Me: For the fourth time, I did answer them! If you somehow managed to miss everytime I said it except for this one, Please scroll up so that you can see my response. Also, You said you "100% will know if [I am] lying. " So suddenly, You are omniscient? You can look beyond your computer screen into my heart? Newsflash: You can't. Besides, The only situation in which I would be lying is if I said yes, In your mind. However, This makes everything you said before irrelevant, Because you said that if I say yes, I am completely immoral. But here, You just said it makes me a liar. Make up your mind please. But backwardseden, Let's face the truth here. You are bigoted towards Christians, And nothing I can say will change that (unfortunately), And nothing you can say will change my mind or the mind of any other committed Christian who comes across your arguments. You don't care so much that you copied arguments from past debates! (And yes, I read some of your past debates). However, You continue to debate Christianity, Despite having lost 74 times and only won 4 times out of 129 debates. If you truly believed that God did not exist, You would not waste your time trying to change anyone's mind who did, Because you have failed to do so. I pray for you and hope that you eventually learn to not hate Christians, Even if you never agree with us.