Should bad debaters be removed from Debate.org

definition of bad- not pleasant, pleasing, or enjoyable.Argument 1: Prefer MY Definition of 'bad' becuase of --- Fairness, DDO rules, and norms of the websiteWell look man, you are new here, im not particularly old on here but old enough to know that, at least on this website, you must specify definitions and rules to the opponent before his acceptance, surely he accepted thinking the resolution meant something else and thus it is unfair to him to then force him to argue something he never intended to argue...such is the case in this debate. I accepted thinking the definition was something else, so its only fair we debate on my terms. These is standard site decency and I'm pretty sure its a rule. I maintain this argument as true and uncontested.Argument 2: Prefer MY Definition of 'bad' becuase of --- The Kritik argument. A.) Let's say we have a voter who hates being mainstream and wants to give the definition of 'bad' to con. Well in this case I still have another reason to prefer my definition, The Kritik argument (for more explanation on a kritik see*). B.) In general a kritik challenges a certain fundemental mind-set or disposition of a resolution becuase it is philosphically bad to accept. If the Kritik is correct and represents a true harm or philosophical harm then the definition should automotically go to me. The reasons, once again, are that accepting that people are poorly skilled in debate: Is a statement of permanence and inescapablility which is bad because it leads to social rejection. It also leads to social rejection because there is an eternal struggle between 'the good and the bad' which means that accepting the existance of bad debaters directly creates a conflict between members which is bad for the website interests, one way it is bad is because it prevents to autonomous free flow of ideas, as should always occur in a place where you can speak your mind. It discourages people from getting better because it labels them as 'lower than acceptable'. Our goal is to promote growth, just as con says, and thus this course of action is bad. It prevents learning. All of these impacts are reasons to prefer my definition of 'bad', and thus every single outcome accepting 'bad' to mean skill must be refuted. Please note every single one has been conceded thus far, as con has not responded to them, and in debates 'silence is compliance'.Final word and some input for this roundAt this point, this is a classic definitions debate. Both con and myself have very strong cases inside of our own respective definitions of bad and thus whoever wins the definitinos debate wins the round. I will concede now that if con's definition is accepted then I should auto-lose. But I honestly don't think it should, as of now he has conceded my points and there are real and substantial negative impacts to accepting con's definition, whereas according to the very rules of DDO and morality, I should be rewarded the definition. It is never acceptable to argue new points in the last round, but in just this instance I excuse and actually request that pro make real arguments against the K and argument 1. I ask the voters to abide and let him argue. Just be aware that you won't be able to respond to my rebutal as it is of course the last round. As of now though, if there is no refutation made, con must lose by concession.thank you.* a kritik usually challenges a certain mindset, assumption, or discursive element that exists within the advocacy of the opposing team, often from the perspective of critical theory ....the link for this is source [1]**Critical Theory - a school of thought that stresses the reflective assessment and critique of society and culture by applying knowledge from the social sciences and the humanities. As a term, critical theory has two meanings with different origins and histories: the first originated in sociology and the second originated in literary criticism, whereby it is used and applied as an umbrella term that can describe a theory founded upon critique; thus, the theorist Max Horkheimer described a theory as critical insofar as it seeks "to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them."...the link for this is source [2]Citations:[1] https://en.wikipedia.org...[2] https://en.wikipedia.org...