Freedom of expression should not be supressed by accusations of sexism.

Pro, Your suspicion that you would be debating a male was incorrect. I am indeed a female, despite constantly being referred to as "he" on this site. In fact the assumption that I am a male on this site is not proof that women do not wish to debate, but rather enforces the notion that debating is generally perceived as a "man's sport," and therefore non-inclusive to women. Further, history shows us that women have been punished and/or discriminated against either blatantly or socially for vehemently expressing their views. For instance, you not-so-humorously portrayed feminists in a negative light in your round, while at the same time non-directly critisized women who were NOT feminists and who enjoy reading frivolous magazines instead of taking a stand in politics. I would like to state for the record that your insecurity with your manhood and/or sexuality in patronizing women should not be a deciding factor in this debate. That said, your contribution regarding a mock meeting between Condoleeza Rice and a foreign minister has absolutely no merit in this debate. For one, you completely negate its value of contributing to your point when you said, "Now that would be properly sexist, but I'm not condoning that sort of prediluvian attitude towards women, far from it." So if this waste of space example has absolutely nothing to do with your point, then why include it in this debate? It has clearly taken up your time and mine, as well as the readers/judges who have unfortunately been subjected to your attempt at being funny (Making fun of Condoleeza's race and role in government with blatant disregard for women?! How clever! You're about as original and genuine as Carlos "Ned Holness" Mencia, mate. Gee I've honestly never heard that before :| ). So what exactly are you advocating? Well you have asked a fellow debater to prove "that the controversial comments [you] may make in the course of [your] arguments should be kept to [your]self." You also state that "men should not feel ashamed to express their admiration for attractive women for fear of being accused of sexism." So alright... a few things. First, I hope that in pointing out your less than amusing/original sense of humor, I have demonstrated why you should keep those "controversial" a.k.a. trying-too-hard-to-be-witty-and-shocking comments to yourself, for the simple fact that they do not contribute to your argument, and instead just take up space and waste time (put it this way - we're not laughing WITH you...). Second, there is a difference between saying things that can be CONSIDERED sexist, and saying things that are downright offensive. Men CAN express their admiration for attractive women without being sexist, therefore one should find more intelligent and socially acceptable ways to vocalize their views (especially during a debate on debate.org, where one would almost certainly get called out for being "abusive" if they did not comply with traditional debate etiquette). Now since you are Pro, the burden is on you to prove the resolution to be true. Even if I agree with you, you have offered no acceptable evidence that would compel anyone to vote Pro. You mentioned chanting songs that repeat phrases like "Get your t~ts out" are acceptable because most women oblige, however you cannot prove that to be true (personal experience doesn't count, because I can say that in MY personal experience, that is not the case). I don't think men are too restricted in what they can say; they can say anything they want, and unless it's unlawful, they will not be penalized other than MAYBE having a few people call them sexist. To that I say quit whining and grow a pair of balls! You're saying that women shouldn't bit