The black death was caused by a volcano and not by germs.

1. Quote -' CON notes many improvements in healthcare....Reductions in Child Mortality. Vaccine-Preventable Diseases, Access to Safe Water and Sanitation, Malaria Prevention and Control, Prevention and Control of HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis Control, Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, Improved Preparedness and Response to Global Health Threats (1) . These events show a medical concern for reducing ( and NOT prolonging ) diseases'. The medical establishment creates a complex network of disease related departments which are supposed to fight against disease. This is all just part of the deception. Disease is not complex. Disease can be beaten just by changing your diet to a more natural one based on a pre-agricultural diet. If people don't eat, sugar, salt, grain, dairy, margarine, fat and sugar then you will never get any of the diseases that the above medical departments deal with. The medical system is based on a 200 year old theory called 'germ theory' which was created by Luis Pastreur. The alternative to this theory is the one posed by his contemporary Antoine Bechamp who was a real biologist and not a sham biologist like Pasteur. The only reason that Pasteur's theory was adopted is because there is a lot of money to be made from germ theory of disease. It only takes about 5 minutes to learn all there is to know about how to avoid disease. Yet, doctors spend between 6 -12 years learning false information which is absolutely useless and doesn't cure or prevent any disease. Thus, the whole medical system is just a money making scam to trick people into paying huge fees for zero service. Quote - "CON responds that having "leaky gut" results in a " greater risk of developing a bacterial infection in the small intestine." This debate is about CAUSES and not about SECONDARY PHASES. The bacteria entering the blood stream is the secondary phase of leaky gut syndrome. This is example of how my opponent keeps cherry picking data to suit his agenda. He keeps putting my statements out of context and tries to manipulate the reader by confusing the issues. Thus, he is using the same kind of tactics that the medical system uses in justifying germ theory. Quote - "CON asks "Do these result in vitamin deficiency? Pro earlier stated that they were caused by vitamin deficiency. Which is it?" Again, Con is attempting to confuse the issues. Vitamin deficiency is the cause of all disease. Antoine Bechamp - " Germs are the result of a disease and are not the cause of it." Note - They didn't know about leaky gut syndrome 200 years ago, so the analysis is all irrelevant. Yet, the medical system still uses Luis Pasteur's theory like it is some kind of religious document which can never be challenged or disputed. That's because admitting that Pasteur was wrong would be too embarrassing for the medical system. It would mean that millions of doctors would be suddenly out of work and all the hospitals would have to close. Thus, they choose to close their eyes and ears to the truth and just hope that the new paleo diet trend disappears somehow. Sorry, doctors, but the Paleo diet is here to stay. Quote - 'CON addressed this previously in round 3, to wit " Diabetes is not caused by a "vitamin deficiency" and is by the way yet another disease to which pro has referred. While there is a casual relationship between vitamin D deficiency , there has not been shown to be a causal link. CON awaits to see how pro misunderstands this distinction." Now we can see how pro misunderstands the distinction between casual and causal relationships.' The medical system likes to use complicated terminology to trick and confuse people into submission. My opponent is adopting the same techniques. "Casual and casual relationships"???????????? What nonsense is this? It would make more sense to read a philosophy book my Emmanuel Kant. lol https://articles.mercola.com... Quote - A quick look at two areas of Africa will give "real world data" to end this debate, While there is famine in eastern Africa, there is little Bubonic plague in that congruent area. While there is an outbreak of Bubonic plague in Madagascar, there is little famine on the island. Thus it is shown that there is neither a casual nor causal relationship between famine and plague. My opponent has failed to note that these countries are subject to civil war which would create a shortage of fresh food and would ruin the agricultural industry. Thus, the diets of people in these areas would be disrupted and they would have to rely on stored grain foods too much in order to survive. Thus, the situation would be similar the the volcanic disruptions of the 1348 - 1352 period.