The war on libya was no means of protcting civilians!

"Well if you believe the bbc you will believe anything!"Thank you for proving that you are indeed a whacked out communist who favors conspiracy news stories and not factually backed ones. "My point is that why didnt they intervene in Tunisia or Egypt? Because they are run by supporters of the Weteren world"Because Tunisia and Egypt didnt fall into a CIVIL WAR like Libya did. There was much more blood, violence, and gore in the Libya revolution than in Tunisia or Egypt combined. "He mensioned in his green book " True democracy exists only through the direct participation of the people." Which is totally correct."Yes that is correct, but last I checked Gaddafi did not allow the direct participation of his people in elections which explains how he held his grip on power for 40+ years. List of freedoms and rights suppressed or outlawed by GaddafiFreedom to assemblyFreedom of expressionFreedom of speechFreedom of religious beliefRight against indefinite imprisonmentRight to being released from jail after they are found not guiltyFreedom from forced disappearancesFreedom of the pressesRight to emigratehttp://www.hrw.org...So Gaddafi preached one thing and then ruled his own country the exact opposite way because he could do whatever the hell he wanted to do..."People agreed with the rebels because they were portrayed as good, law abiding, peaceful protesters even though they had guns from the start"Those protesters started out as simple protesters who were violently executed, it was only until they actually began to revolt did they take up arms, so your assumption that they had guns from the start is completely false. " You say Rebels were been executed, what are the rebels doing now? Even big news co-oprations who supported the rebels are having to say they are torturing and executing Gaddaffi supporters "I'm not here to argue that the Libyan rebels are saints or do only what is right, im here to argue that European intervention in Libya was done on behalf of the well being of those rebels, try to stay on topic. "The things that they dont tell you is that rebels were torturing kids and women fighting for gaddaffi and the regime by whipping and sticking poles up their back-sides!"Told you the Pro was a conspiracy nut, any proof Pro or is this from your beloved communist site?". Here is an article published by RT (Russia Today) who were very good in the sense that they did not take sides.http://rt.com...;This is what that article says"NATO’s intervention plunged Libya back into the Stone Age and the civil war cost the country’s economy more than $40 billion, shrinking it by 60%, according to the IMF. Crude oil production that contributed half of the country’s GDP, almost vanished. Foreign trade also suffered, with imports being damaged by the blocked access to its foreign assets."So we have now another biased source that is putting the entire state of Libya's economy on NATO instead of the CIVIL WAR THAT JUST HAPPENED. Not very observant in Russia are they..."You aid that there was no evidence explaining that al-quida were representing rebels"You showed a video of one Al-Qaeda flag flying over a building somewhere In Libya that does not mean that a majority of Libyan rebels were Al-Qaeda operatives. If a Nazi flag flies here in America it does not mean a large majority of Americans are nazi's, it only means there are Nazi's in America. The same goes for your video that only implies there are Al-Qaeda epratives in Libya, not that all rebels are Al-Qaeda operativesAs for the reporter who claimed this is in Libya over a courthouse, Michael Parenti is the same nut who thinks the 2004 US presidential election was fixed, that global warming is a lie, and the man just so happens to be a RADICAL SOCIALIST that only the Pro would take seriously since he is a radical communist. So he isnt a credible source either. As for the footage of the Gaddafi rally, that was 95% of the population of just once city supporting Gaddafi, Tripoli, the city that Gaddafi just so happens to center his military in. Even a third grader could guess that Gaddafi used his military to stage this elaborate rally for himself. Also Pro, 1/3 of the population is not the majority of a population.... http://www.intifada-palestine.com..." 2 million (1/3 of the nation) rallied in his support clearly showing there fight against the imperialist nations and there little rats" - See how the Pro is heavily in support of Gaddafi and has had his perception so clouded by extremist communist websites shower him with lies?"Ethnic clensing is happenng right now in libya!"The source you gave doesnt work so this is yet another conspiracy theory. " The Libyan rebels were not revolutionaries, they were paid rats by the imperialists!"Conspiracy theory"The real reason why NATO went into libya was for the wealth and oil"Conspiracy theoryLook let me make this short and sweet, the Libyan rebels are not perfect saints acting justifiably 100% of the time. And just because the rebels arent perfect, the Pro sees them as Al-Qaeda imperialistic rats being paid off by NATO to overthrow Gaddafi to give NATO the nations oil or something stupid like that. All of his arguments he is basing these wildly inaccurate conspiracies on are severely communist or socialist biased sources or news articles that contain faulty information or do not tell the whole story. If the Pro had used actual dependabel sources he might have an argument but so far this entire debate hasnt been about him proving that NATO intervened to help people, the pro is using this debate just to sh*t on the West, NATO, and the rebels rather than sticking to the original resoultion.