Donald Trump will make a great President

I'd like to point out how pro states that I have failed to negate any of his presented claims. He claimed how Trump wanted to help stop illegal immigration, and I refuted that by showing factually why Trump's plan is unrealistic. Pro claimed how Trump would make a great president because he is a great president, in which I refuted upon why that would not necessarily be true while speaking about his business failures, and not to mention his bankruptcies. Pro also claimed that I've failed to refute his claims within his rebuttal. If we were focusing on the rebuttal rather than the contention, this debate would be going in circles. (Disregarding the final round only for rebuttals) For these reasons, pro is extremely incorrect with his claim that I haven't provided and refutations to his claims. Continuing on, you've explained why Trump would have a need to hire foreign workers, which is incredibly understandable, however out of the many Americans that applied by their own will, Trump rather than hire the American workers that applied and wanted to work for his companies, decided to reject 96% of the applicants[source in citation in round 3] Because Trump disapproved this many American workers, the claim that Trump is focused on finding Americans job is very questionable with this new evidence. Pro states that Trump actually follows his ideology and mindset because he said he'd raise money for our veterans, and did. This wasn't exactly political ideology, where we can discuss whether or not he practices what he preaches so to speak, but rather this was him out of the goodness of his heart raising money for veterans, completely unrelated to the claim that Trump does not practice in his companies, what he says he wants to do as president. Plus, if Trump truly cared about our veterans, he would not have attacked senator John McCain, a veteran that was taken prisoner of war by saying, "I like people who weren't captured"[Trump,1] If Trump truly cared about veterans, he would not have said something like this about veterans that were captured as prisoner of war. Lastly, pro states that because Trump is not a politician, would provide benefit for the country. He claims that politicians have done nothing for this country, which is incredibly false. Washington post actually claims that congress along with Vice President Biden(all of which are politicians) are getting laws approved faster than ever before.[1] Pro's claim about politicians never getting anything sits atop a very slippery slope. Voters, here are the arguments from pro that remain unclear: -why Trump being not politically correct is a good thing -why a businessman means a great president(sure, from an economic standpoint, but considerations towards foreign policy, guns, immigration, etc, do not rely on a background in business) -why pro believes that Trump university was a success, when he got this information from an unreliable source(98percentapproval.com) a website designed specifically to defend Trump university, most likely a false website considering the numerous lawsuits Trump has faced following the scandal I believe that the voters should vote con for this debate because pro focuses his debate upon false claims, such as how I apparently "haven't refuted his claims," which is incredibly untrue and outrageous. I believe that my clarity, style of debate, and information presented, shows con to be the winner Vote for whom had the better debate, not about whom you agree with, thank you for reading our debate! Citations: https://www.washingtonpost.com... http://www.politico.com...