Love is not natural

The motion: 'LOVE IS NOT NATURAL' In this round, I will rebutt, then conclude. REBUTTALS my opponent said, 'It starts at birth and ends at death and has it's highs and it's lows as you pass trough your life'. But that is not what am arguing for. Am saying that love is not natural and my opponent is writing lyrics instead of giving reasons why love is natural. Beside, since am arguing that love is not natural, I will like my opponent in his next argument to give me statistical data of love that starts by birth and end at death. Do we know that we have number of broken homes? Tell me, how did this broken home end by death? My opponent don't actually have arguments to back up his claim. My opponent equally said, 'The love of an infant' where he clearly explained unconditional love for parents (especially mother). But then, haven't we heard of people who kill their mother? Does that show love? Example:Chicago Man Hires Friends To Kill His Mother For Her Life Insurance Policy.m adamenoire.com/335547 /chicago-man-... Police: Son had mom killed to get at bank account, insurance policies..www.chicagotribune.com >Home>News>Breaking news . Tell me, when some one kills his parents, does that show love? Indeed 'love of infants' moreover, let me address this very well, for infants, you claimed the children love their mother. Now the children don't love their mother at infant. The only thing that happen is that they get use to her possibly because she is close to her. If they love her, it means that when they grow up they will still love her and that means they won't hurt her for any reason but the reverse is the case. The problem with my opponent is that he haven't given any concrete reason, claim with source to back up his claims that love is natural. I said, people choose to love it is not natural but my opponent didn't react to this. My opponent equally said, 'Love of friendship' where he said that it is through friendship that love develops. Now let me address this, to make some one your friend, you will have to choose the person, and if you fall in love, it means its by choice because you choose the person. If you claim you have affections, it is emotional feelings which is likely to be lust. The most annoying part of the statement which my opponent gave is this ' and they lived happily ever after'. Let me ask, who lived happily ever after? Is it the broken relationship? Seriously, if love is based on the definition which I earlier gave, it means that the broken relationships wouldn't have been existing. If love is natural, why is it that some one will leave the person he loves and go to another person? Indeed, love is not natural. Note, Love is not emotion, my opponent is misusing this concept. They are quite different things. One can have emotional feelings for somebody when he is been maltreated and that is not love. My opponent said, 'love is a natural process in the brain' readers, if love is a natural process in the brain, it then means it is not love. It is rather lust and that is not what we are arguing. Love is never a natural phenomenal. IN CONCLUSION, My stand is this, if love is natural, why the problems in relationship and family? I still maintain that love is not natural. And I await my opponents reply