Mitt Romney isn't telling the Truth (as a GOP candidate)

Thanks for the apology, Contra. C1: “ [Obama] said he’d cut the deficit in half. He’s doubled it. He’s doubled it. ”Look at the chart, Obama took office January 20th and used that time for deficit spending. . http://blog.heritage.org...WINC2: "Obama wants to end Medicare as we know it. "The Obama administration has already put big new burdens on industry and insurers in its national health-care overhaul, changing medicare as we know it and aggressively expanding it. . http://news.heartland.org...WIN C3: “Time and again, I pointed out I’m not in favor of a health care plan that includes a national mandate. ”Pressuring his largest opponent to adopt a national mandate is clearly not what he's in favor of, lol. His website explicitly states that he isn't in favor of it. . http://www.mittromney.com...WinC4: “President Obama wants to raise your taxes; I’m going to cut them. ”Romney will cut taxes for all income groups: Individual income tax rates decline by 20 percent, as shown: Current Rate 10% 15% 25% 28% 33% 35% New Rate 8% 12% 20% 22.4% 26.4% 28% . http://taxpolicycenter.org...Obama would raise taxes via the "Buffet Rule" . http://www.washingtontimes.com...WinC5: ConcedeC6: “My plans will … will not add to our deficit. They will abolish it. ”Didn't agree, because the cuts he'd make result in drastically lower gov spending; thus, no deficit. Mitt Romney will be, "Getting our fiscal house in order. ". http://www.mittromney.com...WinC7: “Did you hear this? He believes he ranks among the top four presidents in American history. Can you believe that? I’d find a different spot for him. ”The legislative and foreign policy of a president is what enables him to be evaluated as good or bad. I provided 3 sources, my opponent has not one. . http://www.washingtontimes.com...http://gazzfriends.forumotion.com...http://www.abc15.com...WinC8:concedeC9:concedeC10:concedeNote: 1) As members of DDO would agree, YouTube videos do not suffice as arguments; therefore, I shouldn't have addressed the video, so I didn't. My opponent hasn't directly addressed the points from the video in asserting that they are false, he has the video speak for him. Sorry, not good enough, Contra. This is a debate, you can't have a proxy fill in for you. 2) Also, new arguments brought up in the last round do not count. Therefore, I will not address the sliming arguments you have brought up which include the 24 other points you have brought up and not described how they were lies, nor would the random sound bytes legitimately impune Romney.3) Also, you can't post a link to a website you did not write and try to pass that off as your own argument. A link is not an argument. ConclusionAccording to the setup of the debate, I have won by a clear margin. At the beginning of the debate, this was the setup: CON: Has to rebut PRO. If 9 or less cases are pointed out by PRO and stand, CON wins. I have won contentions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7. That is 6/10 legitimate arguments. Since 4 cases were demonstrated by Pro to be in his favor, and 4 is less than 9, Pro has lost by the terms of the debate, and has lost even if this generous burden of proof was not present. I have won this debate conclusively on the agreed grounds. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .