Jesus could not be the messiah as per his 2 genealogies

Your examples given throughout this debate indicate you seem to be of the literal interpretation of the bible. That is a mistake many make. Just as many other books throughout history use symbolism & allegory to attempt to get us to delve deeper into the meaning so we are able to understand the message ...... rather than just words, the bible's authors do the same. Don't forget that Jesus' main avenue of teaching was parables. Your, "... The messiah is supposed to be king over all the earth as Psalm 2 say ...." Psalm 2:12 Barnes' Notes on Psalms 2:12 Kiss the Son - Him whom God hath declared to be his Son Psalm 2:7, and whom, as such, he has resolved to set as King on his holy hill Psalm 2:6. The word "kiss" here is used in accordance with Oriental usages, for it was in this way that respect was indicated for one of superior rank. This was the ancient mode of doing homage or allegiance to a king, 1 Samuel 10:1. It was also the mode of rendering homage to an idol, 1 Kings 19:18; Hosea 13:2; Job 31:27. The mode of rendering homage to a king by a kiss was sometimes to kiss his hand, or his dress, or his feet, as among the Persians. DeWette. The practice of kissing the hand of a monarch is not uncommon in European courts as a token of allegiance. The meaning here is that they should express their allegiance to the Son of God, or recognize him as the authorized King, with suitable expressions of submission and allegiance; that they should receive him as King, and submit to his reign. Applied to others, it means that they should embrace him as their Savior. Lest he be angry - If you do not acknowledge his claims, and receive him as the Messiah.danger of all who resist, as well as the blessing of all who welcome this mighty and triumphant king. Your, " Jeremiah 23:5 ..." Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers (5) Behold, the days come."The words point to an undefined, far-off future, following on the provisional order implied in Jeremiah 23:4, when the kingdom should once more rest in one of the house of David. A righteous Branch."The idea is the same, though the word is different (here Zemach, and there Netzer), as in Isaiah 11:1. In both cases, however, the word means a "sprout" or "scion," springing up from the root even after the tree had been cut down (Isaiah 6:13), and not a branch growing from the trunk. It is probably in reference to this prophecy that we find the name of "the Branch" (Zemach) so prominent in Zechariah 3:8; Zechariah 6:12. Here, it is obvious, the prophet speaks of the one great Shepherd. A King shall reign."Better, he shall reign as King, the Branch or Sprout being the subject of the sentence. As with all the Messianic prophecies of this class, the thoughts of the prophet dwell on the acts and attributes of a sovereignty exercised personally on earth. Such a sovereignty, "all power in heaven and on earth" (Matthew 28:18), was indeed given to the Christ, but not after the fashion that men expected. Your, "Psalm 110 talks about David, not the messiah. This has nothing to do with this debate about the genealogy of Jesus." is in reference to your attached quote you originally used in round 2 or 3. Here is your original quote, "Psalm 110:1 Jesus was never king, and less king over all the earth. The messiah, who will come soon will be king over all the earth." I had just been responding to you in that respect. Yoiur, "You should not have accepted the debate if you did not agree with the terms. I used Jesus genealogy, I am not saying that the new testament is inspired or can be used to prove Jesus is the messiah." Thing is you used the NT genealogy as ammunition for your side of this debate. Have you not used this repeatedly to say it is useless? That is ammunition. That is part of your debate & the rule you initially had broken. Your, "Zerubbabel was not a king, he was a governor." Yes, I stated that he was not a king last round. Your, "And Zecheriah 4:7 does not allude to the messiah." once again, I'll say you do not look deeper than what the words say. Most studies show that Pslam 2 "Who are you, O great mountain? before Zerubbabel you shall become a plain: and he shall bring forth the headstone thereof with shoutings, crying, Grace, grace to it," are re the Messiah as "Barnes' Notes on the Bible" shows below. "Both images together 1 - (So then the mountain symbolizes every resisting power; Satan and all his instruments, who, each in his turn, shall oppose himself anti be brought low.) & 2 - (And he shall bring forth the headstone - The foundation of the temple had long been laid. Humanly it still hung in the balance whether they would be permitted to complete it Ezra 5:Zechariah foretells absolutely that they would. Two images appear to be used in Holy Scripture, both of which meet in Christ: the one, in which the stone spoken of is the foundation-stone; the other, in which it is the head cornerstone binding the two walls together, which it connects. Both were cornerstones; the one at the base, the other at the summit.) express, how Christ is the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last; the Foundation of the spiritual building, the Church, and its summit and completion; the unseen Foundation which was laid deep in Calvary, and the Summit to which it grows and which holds it firm together. Whence Peter unites the two prophecies, and blends with them that other of Isaiah, that Christ would "be a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense. To whom coming, as unto a living stone, disallowed indeed of people but chosen of God and precious, ye also are built up a spiritual house - Whence also it is contained in the Scripture, Behold, I lay in Zion a chief cornerstone, elect, precious: unto you which believe He is precious, but unto them which be disobedient, the same stone which the builders refused is made the head of the corner, and a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, to them which stumble at the word being disobedient" 1 Peter 2:4-7. A Jew paraphrases this of the Messiah; Jonathan: "And He shall reveal His Messiah, whose name was spoken from the beginning, and he shall rule over all nations." With shouting, grace, grace unto it - that is, all favor from God unto it, redoubled favors, grace upon grace. The completion of the building was but the commencement of the dispensation under it. It was the beginning not the end. They pray then for the continued and manifold grace of God, that He would carry on the work, which He had begun. Perseverance, by the grace of God, crowns the life of the Christian; our Lord's abiding presence in grace with His Church unto the end of the world, is the witness that He who founded her upholds her in being.' Your, "Thus all my arguments stand! Jesus could not be the messiah. Both Matthew and Luke's genealogies show that Jesus was not the messiah," show not only wishful thinking on your part, but once again, you violate the NT rule you had imposed at the beginning. The danger of a completely literal translation of any book is that one loses any deeper meaning as I have stated b4. With your analysis, the book Mobey Dick is only about a fisherman trying to catch a big fish, All other lessons, meanings are lost. Same here with all of your 'proof.' Every single piece of biblical evidence you have used was all a literal translation, so the contextual meanings are lost. Therefore most of the referenced verses you have used have been faulty thru lost meaning of the whole chapter & preceding & subsequent verses. Taking a verse, just like any sentence out of a story, all by itself, eliminates any chance of realizing the whole. Hopefully you will have an enhanced appreciation what the author really is attempting to get the audience to understand as you read forward. Thanx for the chance to research & deepen my understanding of the material brought forth here. Thanx again & good luck.