9/11 must have been assisted by the US government

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. ---Arthur SchopenhauerMy opponent stated:"Seeing as my opponent mostly didn't support his non-mainstream argument about 9/11 with reputable sources, despite my previous post asking him to do so, this post will be shorter than my last."(or is it that he cant refute any of my evidence shown)Now he admits that his claim was "inaccurate" he stated:"I now acknowledge that President Bush was in contact with Vice-President Cheney and that my previous claim was inaccurate." If his claim was "inaccurate" by his own admission. Why does he expect you to believe that any of his sources are credible and mine are not? (1)My opponent stated:"The 9/11 Commission did not conclude that that the Pentagon deliberately tried to mislead them."The Commission reported a year later that audiotapes from NORAD's Northeast headquarters and other evidence showed clearly that the military never had any of the hijacked airliners in its sights and at one point chased a phantom aircraft—American Airlines Flight 11—long after it had crashed into the World Trade Center[1]The Commission was forced to use subpoenas to obtain the cooperation of the FAA and NORAD to release evidence such as audiotapes. The agencies' reluctance to release the tapes—along with e-mails, erroneous public statements and other evidence—led some of the panel's staff members and commissioners to believe that authorities sought to mislead the commission and the public about what happened on September 11. "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described," said John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led the staff inquiry into events on September 11, in an August 2006 interview.[1](2) My opponent left this part out(a mistake im sure): The use of assumed identities is consistent with the official account, but is perhaps more consistent with the view that the Arab men on the flight were patsies, particularly when seen in conjunction with the men's poor piloting skills, Koran-proscribed behavior, and apparent efforts to leave a paper trail.[2](3)My opponent stated:"As for my opponents argument about the jet fuel and the WTC, his facts come from a website that also tries to argue that President Obama was born in Kenya. The type of people that create these websites do not have the best track record with facts." "news source attempts to debunk Dr. Jones's claim as well as those of other controlled demolition proponents." Clear example of red herring.(4)My opponent stated:"quick look at a page from the Pentagon's main website will show the audience that it was still under construction and that my opponent was again incorrect" Really? Main website. False the website he has shown as a source is nothing more than a website to schedule a tour. American Airlines Flight 77 struck a portion of the building that had already been renovated.[4][4a] This was in an article written 9/16/01 My opponent stated "I call out my opponent's lack of knowledge on certain topics...if those points are shown to be inaccurate or misleading." He has not shown any of my arguments to be inaccurate or misleading. That being said I have refuted and shown evidence that each and every argument he has made is false or inaccurate.He keeps asking to put reputable sources in his citations. Why would he do this if he is trying win this debate? Could it be that he cant refute any of my arguments?Why do it?Why would the US government assist the 911 attacks?-- Enabling the passage of the Patriot Act I and II -- Unconstitutionally spying on Americans in the name of terrorism -- Established the Department of Homeland Security -- The Invasion of the Middle East -- A new foreign and domestic policy -- Used to pass the Military Commissions Act which officially ended Habeus Corpus Every argument my opponent has put forth I have shown to be false or inaccurate. Not a single claim he has made is true or factual.Ten years ago I never would have thought that our government would have assisted in the attacks in any way at all but when you look at all the evidence it is very hard not to see that 19 hijackers and a man in a cave pulled it off. I will let evidence speak for itself. [1]http://en.wikipedia.org...[2]http://911research.wtc7.net...[3]http://www.csun.edu...[4]http://articles.latimes.com...[4a]http://en.wikipedia.org...