Who should be the next POTUS???Donald Trump(PRO).......Hillary Clinton(CON)

Thank You Con for responding in a timely manner. Rebuttal 1: Qualification Hillary Clinton's terms as Senator, Secretary of State, and First Lady were the highest positions she has been in. Now lets look at her track record during these positions. 1.) Sen. Clinton voted for the War in Iraq which destabilized Iraq and caused the growth of extremism in the form of ISIS[1] 2.) Sec. Clinton supported American air power to overthrow Gaddafi which has led to an anarchy and a base for ISIS and other terrorist organization.[1] 3.) Sec. Clinton supported arming Syrian moderates, in which some were affiliated with Jihadi Extremism. Many of the American arms are now in the hands of ISIS as a result.[1] 4.) Four Americans were killed under the watch of the State Department which was headed by Sec. Clinton. On top of that, Hillary Clinton lied to the parents of those victims blaming the attack on a YouTube video. Not only that, when the parents found out the truth, Hillary Clinton called them liars.[2] 5.) She put national security at risk and lied about through her emails. (Details in Round 2) 6.) While Hillary was First Lady, Bill Clinton signed NAFTA which resulted in a 1 million U.S. job loss, not to mention Bill was almost impeached.[3] 7.) Sec. Clinton helped bring Iran to the negotiating table which resulted in the Iran deal which is a disaster for the following reasons: Iran gets 150 billion USD to support extremist organizations, improves their technology, and puts Israel, our key ally in the region at risk.[4] Qualification of Trump: 1) President Eisenhower didn't hold any public office, and he is ranked as the 8th best President.(He is highly ranked in many other sources as well)[5] 2) This claim is not backed up by any evidence (Just because I don't know a country doesn't mean I hate their culture) 3) This claim is not backed by evidence (Trump was part of the establishment in D.C. so he knows the government. He also graduated from Wharton School of Finance, so I'm sure he knows history and science) 4) A businessman has to be willing to work with others to make deals. Trump has many employees that he has to interact with. And besides, he has friends in Congress, and he will have the opportunity to elect 2-4 judges of the Supreme Court.[6][7] My opponent points out reasons that aren't supported by evidence for Mr. Trump, and claims these are the reasons to vote Con? Every candidate says what he or she will do. Clinton's "specialized skill" isn't going to help us!!! Rebuttal 2: LGBT Mr. Trump does oppose same-sex marriage but that issue was settled by the SCOTUS which made it legal.[8] It's a state that knows its own people better than the federal government, and the 10th Amendment gives the states the right to make those laws. Think of it this way....anyone can act as transgender and go to the bathroom they choose. Imagine a man going into the girls bathroom while your daughter is in there. I know I would be scared for my daughter. Mr. Trump supported the Gay community during the Orlando attack. While Mr. Trump blamed it on Radical Islamic Terrorism, Hillary blamed it on guns. Many LGBT members said they would support Trump because safety is their first priority[9], and Hillary plans to bring in 550% more Syrian Refugees bringing more terrorism to the U.S.[10] ISIS has said they will send operatives disguised as Syrian Refugees.[11] And is Hillary really advocating for LGBT Rights? She has accepted countless amounts of money from nations that don't respect LGBT rights (Details in Round 1) Religious reasons also make this a controversial issue. LGBT Rights is another debate by itself, so I'm not going to refute all the impacts it has on the LGBT community, because it's ultimately up to the states. With Congress likely to be Republican, it will be impossible for the bill proposed by the Democrats to be accepted.[12] Contention 3: Ableism Mr. Trump was imitating a groveling reporter. He personally didn't know Mr. Kovaleski, and even if he did it was 30 years ago. Not to mention the fact that Mr. Trump is 70 years old. He could've simply forgotten. I'm pretty sure Trump wasn't mocking Mr. Kovaleski, who he hasn't seen for 30 years. Not to mention the fact that he has met with hundreds of reporters throughout his career.[13] And why would he knowingly insult disabled people in the first place? Contention 4: China Currency manipulation by China is bad for the American economy. Currently the U.S. owes China 1.2 trillion dollars.[14] If our current trade deficit were to be reduced, it would create anywhere from 2.3 to 5.8 million jobs.[15] We don't necessarily see China as a threat, but a cheater. And remember its China that doesn't respect us. They militarized the South China Sea....did the U.S. do anything to stop it? They know that we are getting ripped off and we still aren't doing anything, they simply think we are stupid. Remember, Trump is a businessman, he knows how to negotiate, he can and will fix the trade deals. Contention 5: Economy My opponent provides circumstantial evidence. Mr. Trump clearly says that he would only make those deals "IF the economy crashed." I don't think my opponent can predict when the economy will crash. And it did crash, would we just sit there with 20 trillion owed? It would be a disaster for Americans. This claim is contingent upon the economy crashing. Removing illegal immigrants at one time will cause a hole in the economy, but Mr. Trump says it will take a couple of years. But remember this, there are also about 45 million Americans living in poverty compared to 11 million illegals.[16] I'm sure a fourth are willing to work. My opponent is comparing lives of people to money, by saying it would cost the U.S. 24 billion. Is that money more valuable than the safety of Americans? The ban is temporary anyways. As for Trump causing a recession that is false as said by Peter Navarro(Read full report)[17] Contention 6: U.S. Hegemony First of all Trump really wants to Make America Great Again. Second of all, Trump's immigration plan is primarily just enforcing the law by deporting illegals.[18] It would show that America will enforce its laws. What do countries think of this? A country: Not willing to enforce laws, do nothing about trade deals when we are getting ripped off, that is a part of NATO, in which NATO members are not paying their share, that made the Iran deal which is a disaster. The image is that America is stupid. Contention 7: Russia Putin has praised Donald Trump.[19] Trump becoming President can help thaw U.S.-Russian relations. Imagine if the two countries can fight ISIS together. They have shown that they are willing to work together. Hillary Clinton cannot thaw relations with Russia as she has already been in that position. Remember Russia has the most nukes in, the world. If these relations could improve, the two countries with the most nukes would be working together. My opponents claims about Putin and Trump not willing to work together are completely false. Mr. Parakilas never says this in his report that Trump will be bad for US-Russian relations Contention 8: Climate Mr. Trump said he was joking if you read your source. Putting coal miners out of work is not the solution to Climate Change. Hillary has said that she will put coal miners out of work and put many coal companies out of business.[20] Obama's Climate Action Plan would lower the temperature by 1/100 of a degree Celsius costing billions of dollars and would jeopardize jobs. Not to mention the other 6 reasons why Climate Change isn't real.[21] The majority of scientists statistic was a two question survey in which only 77 out of the 3,000 scientists had more than half of their papers accepted by the climate science journals. The questions were also very vague to begin with.[22] It has been extremely fun to debate with you. I hope I can change your view of Mr. Trump after this debate, as the media has brainwashed a lot of people with their lies about Mr. Trump. Sources [1]http://www.huffingtonpost.com... [2]http://cnsnews.com... [3]http://www.huffingtonpost.com... [4]https://www.washingtonpost.com... [5]http://www.rantpolitical.com... [6]http://www.politico.com... [7]http://www.thegreenpapers.com... (Judges Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Breyer) [8]http://www.npr.org... [9]http://www.inquisitr.com... [10]http://www.cbsnews.com... [11]http://www.wnd.com... [12]http://www.centerforpolitics.org... [13]http://abcnews.go.com... [14]http://www.npr.org... [15]http://www.epi.org... [16]http://www.huffingtonpost.com... [17]http://www.cnbc.com... [18]https://www.donaldjtrump.com... [19]http://www.cnn.com... [20] [21]http://thehill.com... [22]http://www.forbes.com...