Homosexuality is Morally Wrong, Therefore Unjust, Gay Marriage must therefore be illegal.

Unfortunately I am going to have to assume you are very young. Voters support gay marriage. This doesn't mean gay marriage is moral. It means it is supported by a majority of voters. At one point in our country slavery was accepted by a majority of voters, this did not make slavery moral. It in fact took the minority group (those in favor of abolition) many years to get the majority to see the error in its ways. So please again, do not confuse voter support with morality. They are not the same thing by any means. You have conceded my point. Through stating your belief that more than 50% would have to be homosexual to produce stagnation, you yourself have stated that homosexuality can cause stagnation. The only remaining issue is your lack of understanding for the term stagnation, stagnation means inactivity. If 50% of the population were homosexual, this would indeed encourage stagnation. However if 1% of the population is homosexual, this too encourages stagnation. Or encourages inactivity. Homosexuals are in and of themselves inactive in terms of population growth. Homosexuals cannot directly contribute to population growth. If you cannot contribute to growth, you contribute to inactivity, or to decline. Homosexuals do not contribute to the DECLINE of humans. They contribute to the inactivity of human population growth. Something that contributes to the inactivity of human population growth, may lead to decline in the future, though this is neither here nor there. However inactivity of population growth is morally bad. Your exaggeration is either immature or misinformed. I no where in this debate stated the only way to better a species is to reproduce. However I do state that contributing to inactivity of a species works against the betterment. Obviously there are many ways to better your species, when homosexuals adopt children they are bettering, when all Americans pay taxes they are bettering, when we educate ourselves we are bettering, when we realize the difference between morals and opinions we are bettering, there are many ways to better, many ways to act morally. However 2 moral rights, do not correct 1 moral wrong. Nor do 3 or 4. A moral wrong works against the betterment of mankind. You have admitted that you see the potential for homosexuals to work against the betterment. Your confusion lies in belief that small statistics are insignificant. As if to say "Genius' do not change the world, to change the world more 50% of the world's population." or to say "Murder does not cause stagnation, that would mean more than 50% of the world's population is murdered." or to say "Bird flu shouldn't be feared, to be feared it would need to effect more than 50% of the world's population." If 50% was the basis for effecting change, how often would things change? Again now that you have conceded the point that homosexuality does indeed cause stagnation. Please justify your requirement that it will only cause stagnation if it effects more than 50% of the world's population. More clearly stated: Demonstrate that homosexuality, which in and of itself is an inability to contribute to the population, does not contribute to inactivity of population growth. To do this you will need to show how homosexuals do help the population grow. If they do not help it grow, they must encourage it to be stagnate. If they encourage it stagnate, they work against the betterment of mankind. If they work against the betterment of mankind, they must be immoral. If they are immoral, they must be unjust. If unjust, then the courts must not side with them.* *This statement is only true if you believe the court is meant to deliver that which is just.