GodSand's *other* proof of the existence God is logically invalid

Kleptin is getting muddled up with lies and opinions. If DNA was formed from nothing without an intelligent being, then DNA is a product of random and un-intelligent design, (I am not even sure if the word 'design' is appropriate). If DNA came not from some intelligence then DNA will not seem code like at all, but it would have all the features of a pattern. Using up time and chance to create such a incredible storage device, which our most modern of computers come no where close to being as efficient would be nothing short of a miracle. Since DNA contains information, it is a code. Sand, mud, rocks etc do not contain information unless an intelligence has interfered, for instance, one chizilling away at a large rock to create a beautiful sculpture. DNA is natures way to create living sculptures, DNA which is located inside the nucleus of a cell, informs the cell of what it's job is. For example: you have just finished a work out, and you need to eat protein to increase your muscle density, the protein is turned into amino acids as it enters the stomach, only when it finally used up, the cell will copy the DNA into RNA which then will be formed inside a new muscle cell turning back into DNA. (RNA is the same as DNA, it just called that because it is not inside a cell). Therefore creating extra information. To create information, man made or not, you need a mind behind it all, in this case the mind was the person who had just finished his work out. Information that is needed to create muscle, fat, bone, ivory, hair, skin, and all the rest which makes up a living organism. It says in Psalm 139:13 that God knitted you inside your mothers womb. The Bible concludes DNA is information, a code, Since the term knitting is a intelligent activity it is also coded to make certain clothing. Where as my opponent would agree that if you were to throw a knitting kit up in the air, it would land back down as a perfectly made jumper. As an analogy this is what he would agree with from what I understand. DNA contains the same instructions to a word processor on a computer. As is shown. DNA: Language Nucleotide: Character Codon: Letter Gene: Word Operon: Sentence Regulon: Paragraph Chromosome: Chapter By Pro arguing that DNA is not a code, see for your self. This shows that DNA has set rules to follow just like word processor does. Word processor was man made, DNA was made by God. If you disagree you might as well consider buying into the notion that word processor is also a product of chance. That it could be very well possible that if you were to randomly click on your computer screen all day, maybe you might make something intelligent like a Microsoft document? DNA just as I have explained uses the same method as word processor, all that is different is that DNA is a much more elegant storage device. As word processor is stored on a hard drive DNA is stored inside a cell. The only real difference is that DNA is organic, and word processor is not. However imagine technology which is so advance it can copy it's self, in that you only need one piece of DNA and then you could create a human body, by just reorganizing the letter T, G, C and A. In Genesis 2 verse 21, God causes Adam to fall into a deep sleep, God removes one of Adams ribs. In Hebrew rib means double helix (Curve) DNA. So God actually took DNA from Adam, reorganized the four letters and then multiplied it to create Eve. From this there is conclusive evidence that shows God created DNA. Pro goes on to claim that because I am not a scientist I do not understand a code from a pattern, this is absurd, to reconcile a code you neither need to be a scientist or you do not need to examine closely. Take for instance a padlock, it usually has four numbers, what Con is saying is that when someone un-locks a padlock, it seems like the person knows the code, when really he does not. Instead this person merely guessing, getting it correct every time while being up against the hundreds of thousands if not over a million random conbanations. Yet there is the certain four which this person manages to get every time. This is how likely it is for DNA to arise from a source with no intelligence. You can drink from both a bowl and a cup, however one is better than the other, both store liquid well but one is more efficient. DNA is that better one of the two. DNA is far better that anything man made. Pro used a bad analogy. Conclusion: Pro's arguments has been blown sky high. Kleptin never got explained why DNA has only four letters out of the millions of conbanations is could of easily had. He has also failed to give me an example of a code which has not come from a mind. All codes come from minds and DNA is a code, formed by God, thus God exists. Pro also does not explain why I have supposedly failed to prove intelligent design. I've also given ulternitive evidence that DNA was made by God, through the Hebrew language. Thank you.