Does Atheism = Immorality

Of course atheism is immoral. Your own argument that it has to gets its notions of right and wrong from other sources than itself proves it is immoral. It is a symbiotic religion that depends on other religions to define right and wrong AND a notion of supposed free will within those notions of right and wrong in order to exist itself. It is not a stand-alone ideology but stand-against ..something else.. as its only real "point". It is really just the lie of human free will trying to be free from all supposed constraints and using 'there is no god' as a particular rhetorical strategy within that overall desire as it uses other rhetorical strategies against other constraints. But atheism would not be alone in that regard. Buddhism for instance, and atheism are exactly alike in that regard. Buddhism needs other surrounding religions in order to exist itself because there is no morality within itself and no real notion of a god. The whole point is to supposedly reach a stage of actual and total personal sovereignty in which there is no restraint to an idealized free will and to supposedly join others who have already made the journey. No one would be deceived about it unless they said somebody else already made it, right? So they have their own pantheon of "those who made it and wrote down how to do it." Atheism in that same regard is simply a younger version of Buddhism and hasn't matured/collapsed ( depending on your own point of view) into a ritual-based system or concepts of how much time it will theoretically take to "know your there". But both are just lies in non-creating speech...that makes sense to those within it. Atheism, like Buddhism gets its emotional training wheels from surrounding acts of the same speech, no matter the particular version/tongue of that speech. They are all taught out of the same basket of " stimulus event A mandates emtoion B" and so forth. But within the mind of those deceived those emotions are legitimate and a good thing to be gained, atheism and Buddhism think they have a unique perspective on how to attain the common emotional goals and be legit in that emotional economy. Morality to them all is just a subset of supposed wisdom on how to attain those goals. But it seems to atheists that they have a "free-er" and more flexible approach to get to the supposed paradise of good emotions all the time. Both are just reactions to lies about God and evils perpetuated by those who say they represent God; but in the deception that Truth is what, instead of a Who. In that deception, atheism is not merely "lacking morality" as in lacking a standard of ideal behaviors, but is immoral, meaning to be against all ideal models of behaviors and to "break rules" just to do it, but in the pretense it is after a higher good in so doing. Jesus Christ is Truth. I am a Christian, a non-metaphorical new creature in Jesus Christ. So I won't debate with the rhetorical strategies of atheist which is but a subset of a much larger evil. Whence then cometh wisdom? and where is the place of understanding? For it is hidden from the eyes of all living, and concealed from the fowl of the heavens. Destruction and death say, We have heard its report with our ears. God understandeth the way thereof, and he knoweth its place: For he looketh to the ends of the earth, he seeth under the whole heaven. In making a weight for the wind, and meting out the waters by measure, In appointing a statute for the rain, and a way for the thunder's flash: Then did he see it, and declare it; he established it, yea, and searched it out; And unto man he said, Lo, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding. Job 28:20-28 In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen