Everything that anybody does is selfish.

My opponent states that I have completely left out the disregard for others, and while I did not specifically say this is where the disregard is, I would have hoped that my opponent would have read between the lines. To clarify though, in the example of giving a gift, the disregard comes in when you are valuing the fact that you gave them the gift, over the fact that they now have it. So you are leaving out of consideration that it would help them, but rather you are looking for the mental gratification of seeing them happy. That's the reason that we are sad when someone doesn't like the gift we give them, because we miss out on said gratification. My second example is pretty much self explanatory, so I will be going onto the next topic. Going onto what my opponent stated as "ARGUMENT USING CORRECT DEFINITION" His example states that he values making her life easier, is why he is holding the door open. However, he doesn't state why he values making her life easier. Well, I'll tell you. It is for the mental gratification of knowing that he made someone's life easier. So he is not actually seeking to merely help someone out, he is looking for the mental gratification of knowing that he is helping someone out. So, the disregard comes in when you take into account that he doesn't actually care about making her life easier, that is just a side-effect of that mental gratification that he is truly seeking. Finally, my opponents "ARGUMENT USING INCORRECT DEFINITION" For the ham sandwich example, it is simple to disprove that by giving you another example. Say I hit you with a stick, the stick may have been the one making contact with you, but you don't yell out that stick hit me. You yell that I hit you. So in his case of forcing someone to eat a ham sandwich, the person eating the ham sandwich isn't the one doing the action, it is the person that is physically forcing them to eat a ham sandwich. By this example you are essentially making them an inanimate object, and it is impossible to say that the inanimate object is the one actually doing the action. For his example of bleeding, that is an extreme example of selfishness. The body has no regard what-so-ever as to what it might be bleeding on and ruining, but is trying to clot the wound. Depending on how you look at it, the action of bleeding could also be selfish to the shooter because maybe the shooter has a phobia of blood, and yet you have no disregard for that, and you are ruining his carpet. For his example of jumping, you have to look to the fact that, in his mind, it seemed that jumping would be more beneficial to himself then not jumping. You can't say that a person didn't want to fall, because if they didn't want to fall, they simply wouldn't have jumped. Falling into a coma and passing out go together, and can be brought down together. Your body is being selfish here in the regard that it cares about repairing what damage may have been done, with no regard for anybody that may have missed you while you were out. Visiting sites with gross content is proved as selfish because the fact that you are on a computer is offensive to some people's faith, and yet you have no regard as to their beliefs. You are also using up electricity, making the demand and the price higher with no regard for others who may be struggling to pay their electric bills. The action of running over a deer with a car implies that you are in a car and driving it. Simply be driving a car, you are putting others lives at risk, which would be another example of disregard for others. The disregard comes in when no matter how safe of a driver you are, there's still the possibility of an accident, and yet you have no regard for whos life you could potentially injure by being in said car. Another way to disprove would be to point out that since he is in a car, he is polluting the environment, with little regard for people that may get diseases for that pollution. I have disproved all of my opponents claims against my case, and thus the round will have to go to pro because I have proved all of my opponent's case as false. Thank you.