Someone Should Create a Separate Nation For People of "Alternate Sexualities"

"I was actually aiming at the fact that Alaska is not close to inhabited Russia at all, which you suggested. So Russian homosexuals would have a long trip as well as other countries. " Okay, I can concede this much. "I see you're trying very hard to sweep this under the carpet, but it's immensly unfair to just relocate all of its citizens, no matter how much there are. You want to force them out of their home, where they're familiar, and dump all of them in two or three cities. This sudden gigantic growth of the cities may cause a temporary unemployment and trouble. And they can't get back to where they live because their town is now inhabited by people who have sex with little kids, animals and dead people. Nice, huh? " Sure, there'd be some unemployment and housing troubles. However, it'd be quite easy to fit 750,000 people in one city. It'd be less than a third the population of Chicago, and there could be two or three cities. . http://en.wikipedia.org... However, I suppose you could exclude the Pedophiles and allow the LGBT community and the natives to coexist. "Don't underestimate one's adjustment to his natural climate. The American biologist Joel Allen researched the anatomic built of people in relation to their environment. He concluded that people in Africa are taller and more slender because they take up more space and therefore lose more bodywarmth, which is ideal in hot climates. At the same time, people in cold climates are generally shorter and wider, preserving bodywarmth. Their bodies are not meant for the exact opposite climate. And yes, while radiation may prevent hypothermia, it will still be very uncomfortable. " Like I said, it'd be a refuge for persecuted LGBTQPZN people. If you live in a gay-friendly nation, you wouldn't have to go here. And if climate were trouble, a different location would be picked, but I'm not quite ready to do that yet. It would be uncomfortable, but it'd be better than being stoned. "And which governments would those be? Will it be the American government, whose citizens' lives in Alaska you've just destroyed? Or will it be the European government, who will have no participation in this since they accept alternate sexualities? Maybe the Russian government will want to donate? Oh no, I can't imagine they would. The middle east? Would they be willing to donate money to an entire community which they would reject in their own countries? " Most likely the US Government. We're already wasting huge amounts of money anyway, so why not waste our money on something worthwhile? "My opinion on the matter is not important, the fact remains that these children will be constantly threatened. And for the record, if pedophobic means I wouldn't want a pedophile in my town near my children, then yes I guess I am. Tolerance only goes so far. " I was just messing with you here. "And do you think BP will be happy with the LGBT people stealing a large sum of their profit? The Alaskan oil refinery is managed by the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System. This organisation is made up of BP, ConocoPhilips, Exxon Mobil and many more. I'm not an expert on the matter, but I doubt they would be fine with the local community stealing their oil and selling it to other countries. " Okay then, perhaps they'd be required to hire LGBTQPZN workers exclusively. But in any case, if the land is allotted to this new nation, then it's their right to control the oil, not the BP's right. The US Government could stand up for this new country. "Might be, but no tomatoes, rice, potatoes, bananas and many more foods we take for granted. " True, but that's what the exports are for. Or, they could adjust to eating local food, like the European settlers in America did when they went West.