In 12 Angry Men the boy is guilty

First of all I would like to clarify that I do not intend to nor did I claim I would prove the boy is innocent. I only intend to create a reasonable doubt, as I do not believe there is any proof either way."First I'd like to bring to the table that the boy screamed at his father, "I'm going to kill you." Now how many of us out there yell something like that at our parents. We might say I hate you or something like that, but the phrase I'm going to kill you then the boy's father winds up dead in the same night. I doubt that that is a coincidence."We don't know this. The old man who lived in the apartment underneath claimed to hear this, but it's unlikely he could have heard it given that an el train was going by the window as the boy allegedly said it. Even if we assume the boy screamed loudly enough to be heard over the noise, it's unlikely that the old man would have been able to identify the voice and make out the exact words."Another interesting coincidence is that the murder weapon was the same that the boy had. This murder weapon was a switch blade which by itself is illegal to possess not to mention the fact that the boy claim that he had lost it within a few hours of the death of his father and the murder weapon was the same that the boy had."While true, this is circumstancial. The weapon was not unique, and there were no fingerprints on it. One of the jurors owned an identical knife to the murder weapon, and got it from the same general area that the boy lived in."The Boy also went to a movie, but doesn't remember the details. Say you go and see Aladdin. You might not remember all the plot details, but you will remember that Robin Williams is the Genie and that Aladdin wanted to get Princess Jasmine and eventually got her love in the end and also freed the Genie. See you might not remember the entire movie, but the fact that he doesn't remember what movie he went to is absurd and an interesting excuse."As far as we're aware, the boy was not asked about the plot. All we know is that he didn't remember the name of the movie or the stars who appeared in it. If the boy was not the type to stick around for ending credits he may well not have known who appeared. That still leaves the issue of the title. I think this can probably be chalked up to nervousness inhibiting his ability to think-I know that I have had experiences in which I get too nervous to speak under circumstances much less stressful than being interrogated by the police while my father is lying dead on the floor in front of me."Then you have to the elderly folks. The women who saw the Kid run out of the house in a flash. Now if the kid didn't kill his father then why didn't he stay in the house and call 911 or try to help his father. The old man also saw the boy."My opponent seems to be conflating two pieces of testimony. There was a woman who claimed to see the kid stab his father, and an old man who claimed to see the boy run out of the house. The woman's eyesight is questionable since at least half of the jury noted that she had marks on her nose that could only be made by eyeglasses. Since she just woke up as the murder occurred, she wouldn't have had glasses on at the time. This means she would have to identify a man 50 feet away in the dark without glasses. It's not impossible, but unlikely. Even without that, she was the only eyewitness. One person can lie."If the boy didn't kill his father then another person had done it for reasons completely unknown and this other person had left no evidence of the murder."The only actual physical evidence of who committed the crime was the knife found in the father's chest, which might have belonged to the boy, but might not. There were also two witness accounts, but both are somewhat shaky. It is possible that the boy did kill the father, but the evidence is not sufficient to declare him guilty.