The Bible is an Inconsistent Document

LET'S STOP SPLTTING HARES. The reason why hares once chewed the cud but no longer do (The Bible is NEVER wrong, it's the inerrant Word of God.) Is easily explained.. perhaps you are not familiar with the popular sciences but there is a fairly new theory banging around called Evolution. (Lowest form of wit? never!) This gift from God, NAMELY the ability to adapt and change physiology to a new environment (for example after a vast global wide flood) has been twisted by those in the pay of the evil one to assert the ludicrous assumption that one 'kind' of animal can eventually, given enough (yawn) time, become another 'kind'. Obviously the exact point of deceit is, as always, classification. For example some would wish to classify as such: Horse - E. caballus - Equus Caballus Donkey - E. asinus - Equus Asinus Mule - E. caballus x asinus - Equus Mule Mules are the offspring of a Horse and a Donkey -The reason they can still mate is because they are ALL the SAME KIND. They have a common ancestor, the first Horse! So Hares used to chew the cud but have adapted to a new environment. Noah: You'll have to give me more than a 'book' of the bible.. chapter & verse. REMEMBER the burden of proof is on YOU to prove the bible is an inconsistent document, I've easily refuted every argument. I'll indulge you somewhat but if I show that seemingly contradictory facts are cleared up by a simple explanation then you STILL have all your work ahead of you. Flood: The Bible clearly states that the waters receded.. There's just a LOT more water that there used to be. How do you know what the world was like before (or just after) a flood you don't believe in? Fit for military: But you cannot know that there is NOT this distinction. Its seems perfectly clear to me. entering the ark: It means 7 males & 7 females.. 2+2+2+2+2+2+2=14! Genetic viability would only be a concern if there were no Sovereign God guiding His creation. Dirt/serpents: I think most people would concede that anything entering somethings mouth whether willfully or not could be described as 'eating'.. UNLESS you were HELLBENT on disproving something you begin to fear TRUE. "eat my dust" etc Plant species: More likely they became poisonous only after the fall.. some animals also became carnivores then. men's age: Men's age span has receded the further away from God we've wandered, Sin is a real killer! Certain institutions (hospitals, university's etc) all started by Christians have raised the standard of living and so the age span. The Earth had a layer of water in the atmosphere which created an oxygen rich green house effect. Judas: Your being so pedantic on these trifling points HURTS your case.. If Judas' money was used by the priests (they never would have 'owned' the money) then Judas, although dead, 'bought' the field. The ONLY way anyone could fall down and 'burst' would be if the corpse were allowed to bloat.. like hanging from a tree? JESUS: They CAN all be correct, As I said the differences PROVE the validity.. The narrative is no longer 'you shall & you should' But, 'this is what I saw..' mark interviewed the witnesses. MUCH MORE IMPORTANTLY is the resurrection of Christ, over 500 people saw Him at one time! Tarzan, take the time to study the evidence, it is compelling. I recommend Lee Stobel's "The Case For Christ." Lot: The Bible teaches that faith alone justifies, makes us righteous. The Law: God's perfect Law, mans sinful failure to keep it.. ? GOD: Lets get one thing straight, YOU do not judge God.. GOD JUDGES YOU. CONCLUSION: My opponent has offered NO evidence biblically that the bible is in anyway inconsistent.. I have refuted his quibbles easily. NOTE the fact that my opponent relys more and more on emotional terms such as 'laughable' etc and his tone becomes more shrill with every desperate attempt to keep God's Word from the door of his heart.