Christian teachings support anarcho capitalism over social anarchism

Rebuttals As you quote "The temple scene and property rectification", the exact quote fails to mention whether it is actually Jesus' temple of worship. In reality, temples were public spaces back then as evidenced by the fact that there was a market there (I reference your first quote Matthew 21:12). Jesus in reality had no right to drive them out of the "temple courts". In your terms (anarcho-capitalist's third view), Jesus did an act of aggression against the stall-owners, probably damaging their merchandise. While as he claimed they were stealing, is there any actual proof of that? Jesus also did not have the proper authority to knock over the stalls as evidenced in Matthew 21:23 "Jesus entered the temple courts, and, while he was teaching, the chief priests and the elders of the people came to him. "By what authority are you doing these things?" they asked. "And who gave you this authority?"". Then, they go on a conversation about who gave him authority which culminates in Matthew 21:27 "So they answered Jesus, "We don't know." Then he said, “Neither will I tell you by what authority I am doing these things.". The fact that Jesus is even asked this shows that it is not his temple. This shows Jesus' gross disrespect for other people's property. While Jesus did claim that they were stealing, he did not claim who they were supposedly stealing from. If they had supposedly stolen from someone else, then your fifth view of anarcho-capitalism states that Jesus could not do that as he was not stolen from. In your second paragraph in your first contention you fail to substantiate Jesus' claim that they were stealing. Metaphorically, you could argue that Jesus said that they were stealing because they were charging too high prices. Saying that, in fact, would not be an anarchist view as that would be regulation of the free market of Jerusalem. In your "sub-contention", you quote the ten commandments as in "you shall not steal." Your rationalization that in a socialist anarchist society, everybody owns everything, therefore, you cannot steal, is flawed. As everything belongs to everyone, some people could take a lot without giving back. That would be stealing from the community as a whole. For example, everybody takes what they need from the communal food area. Somebody takes a lot more than they need and let it waste in a corner. That would be stealing from the community. As one of your quotes revolve around actions of dubious reasons by Jesus, as well as being able to be interpreted in favour of socialism, your contention is flawed. Arguments My argument revolves around Ecclesiastes 3:13, Acts 4:34-35, Mark 10:21 and Mark 21:12-13. "that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need." directly supports a conversion from anarcho-capitalism to socialist principles (from Acts 4:34-35). "That everyone may eat and drink, and find satisfaction in all his toil--this is the gift of God." is a direct support of socialist anarchism (from Ecclesiastes 3:13). Really, this advocates for the shared resources central to social anarchism. "Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me." (from Mark 10:21 (original King James Version)) shows the social anarchism central to my argument. As the socialist part is very clear, I now must explain the anarchism part. As Jesus said, the man must sell his items, and give it to the poor under no governing body. Treasure would've been given back to him (he declined the offer) as what he gave will flow back to him. Jesus does not say who would give it to him because no one would give it to him. It would just appear. "Jesus entered the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. "It is written," he said to them, "My house will be called a house of prayer, but you are making it 'a den of robbers'." (from Matthew 21:12-13) shows that Jesus is saying that it is a den of robbers because they are 'stealing' from the poor. The bible specifically quotes "selling doves" as an example of an animal. The poor need the animals for sustenance but the traders are quoted as robbers because they charge money for items. As the poor people cannot afford the items, Jesus overturned the tables as a statement that charging for items is wrong. This also supports socialism. ConclusionI conclude this argument by stating that the burden on Pro will be to rebut my four passages and create solid new arguments to prove that the bible supports anarcho-capitalism. I pass the debate to Pro.