Rational_Thinker9119 is possibly the smartest debater on DDO

Thanks again to Pro. R1) Debate Skills"As for number of debaters who are extremely versatile, I will give an example of a great debate in which the biggest troll [imabench] got trolled. .. This shows RT's smartness-he knew how to get on the biggest troll's nerves, by trolling the troll. This shows he is even smarter than imabench! "Let's take a look at the debate: . http://www.debate.org...Imabench did not get flustered at all, actually. .. He accepted his defeat by Round 3, and his insults were meant to be entertaining (which they were). All Pro is showing with these "My Opponent will Lose this Debate" debates is that RT can win a debate which was designed to make him win anyways. Incredible feat. Wow. (Sarcasm). "Very compelling evidence for being an amazing debater vs being super smart. .. Do I have to keep on stating this was only a weak opening statement? "Seeing as this is the only other statement made by Pro about RT's debate skills, it is safe to assume that Pro has conceded this argument. R2) Intelligence" RT may have been the Devil's Advocate on this topic. .. RT knows his side very well, and challenges himself to go for the other side. It is only logical that he fails"Allow me to provide some excellent examples of people who have played Devil's Advocate and WON. Sargon:. http://www.debate.org...Wylted:http://www.debate.org...As you can see, playing Devil's Advocate does NOT automatically imply failure, so saying RT doing so excuses his concession is illogical. "the topic is so complex that I can't understand a single word of it. "Just because YOU can't understand it doesn't make RT a genius. .. Sargon understands it so well that he won TWO debates on the subject (the first was provided in round 1 as one of the examples of debates which are at least as high level as RT's debates). And it isn't just Sargon. Many users on this site, such as Mikal, bladerunner060, Magic8000, GWL-CPA, Subutai, and Citrakayah have displayed the ability to understand such technical terminology, completely disproving the notion that RT's use of it means he is the smartest user on the site. Also, Pro has declined to comment on the debate that RT plagiarized in; thus Pro concedes that either1) RT lacks knowledge about Quantum Mechanics or2) RT lacks the good judgement to avoid plagiarizingThis alone shows that RT is almost certainly NOT the smartest debater on the site, as many debaters here have never plagiarized before AND have an in-depth knowledge of QM. R3) "Possibly""I started off this topic saying "POSSIBLY", stress on "POSSIBLY. ". .. RT MIGHT be the smartest person on DDO. "Here, we see Pro turning to semantics after all his actually decent arguments have been refuted. First of all, if we look at the comments section of the debate, we see that Pro STOLE this idea from the observations of several other members such as RT himself, Ragnar, and philochristos. Pro even admitted in the comments section that using this idea hadn't occurred to him, saying that "I actually didn't think of that. LOL". However, no where does Pro credit any one of those users with giving him this idea. Pro has pretty much plagiarized! Such a flagrant violation of conduct should, at the very least, invalidate this argument. CONCLUSIONSR1- Pro has conceded his arguments about RT's debating skillsR2- There are several people who are likely to have even MORE knowledge of science and philosophy than RTR3- Pro has stolen this argument from elsewhere without giving credit where it's due, automatically invalidating it.