is abortion ok

For one thing I would like to finally reiterate how much I appreciate guidestone's acceptance of this challenge, he has been a very formidable opponent. I will now rebut my opponent's rebuttals (for a 2nd time with no arguments): un-numbered. An unborn fetus is and an unborn (both are referring to the unborn offspring of a human) are the same thing. 1. The 14th amendment may say this but also liberty, this could also mean that a restriction on abortion could violate this right. 2. If the contents of my point 6 and 7 were fact and not opinion, there would be no debate there 3. I agree to keep it secular but I still had to have a rebuttal or it would cost me 4. Yes, but at least they do not need to live through any mental scarring or getting ridiculed for their challenges 5. I also used scientific evidence and also, that could always be disputed it cannot maintain homeostasis on it's own, nor can it reproduce in a human way. Also you said yourself your argument (or lack there of) is if the unborn are human when in fact you claim that it is a zygote, not a human. 6. Ummmm that isn't even a rebuttal that is just saying what we all already knew, excluding of course the inaccuracy that this argument is not central to the debate. 7. Well, if the child is on the streets being too cold or too hot, always wondering where your next meal would come from. Would you like that? That is the poor quality of life argument is about. No it is not a reward, but if there will be an extremely poor quality of life, making them be born would be a punishment. 8. Would you like a drawn out, ten year life of pain only then ending in death, or would you rather not go through that. I never said you were against abortion because of painful death, no claim was made. The spectrum argument is irrelevant because the child, once born has a right to choose it's own fate and express it, (the and express it is the point there) if the child wants its life to end ,it should be given that right. 9. Ok, just because it may be a human fetus you are using the word fetus as a noun and the word human as an adjective. Fetus is a noun especially how you used it. 10. Back to the Spectrum argument, anyway that was ignoring the other qualifications for life, and actually yes a three year old girl, having never had a period, can still get pregnant and theoretically reproduce. 11. Ok while the baby has different DNA it gets parts of it from the mother and technically the baby develops from the woman's egg when fertilized and is (especially while in the womb) part of the woman's body [1 (this also says the zygote contains the DNA to BECOME a baby]). 12. Oh come on, that was something extra not a statement on anything else, can one thing just be independent room other things, just once, genocide is NOT ok. I will now present my final argument: 1) If you disagree with abortion don't get an abortion, don't stop someone else, I am not forcing anyone to get an abortion, it should be the woman's choice. Finally I request that you make an argument next round so here are a few pre-rebuttals: 1) The woman could get hurt in an abortion: this is literally a maternal health thing (if you do not use this argument in your final round I am not saying you think this. [1] http://www.nlm.nih.gov...