Hitler wasn't such a bad guy

I'd like to start out by congratulating my opponent on presenting great arguments exceedingly well. With that being said let's move on to my arguments. 1. Morality is not democratic -My opponent seems to think because morality has no definitive premise other than what we make of it, whatever the majority of people consider to be moral is. However, that is not the case. China and India combined make more than half of the world's population, and share multiple cultural similarities. Does that mean they're "more" moral based on sheer numbers? You said earlier you're in favor of homosexuals being able to marry. India passed a law less than a year ago literally making it illegal to even partake in homosexual acts, and they're one of many countries who are overall opposed to it. Based on your own argument, you must be immoral. And with your moral compass so skewed, how could you possibly judge someone so revered by his people during his time? Adolf Hitler must be moral after all, if someone as morally bankrupt as you is attacking him. 2. Quantitatively, Hitler did more good than bad -Hitler may have led mass genocide, but he also banned vivisection (the cutting of live animals), led many medical studies including how to treat victims of hypothermia, and many other good things. Does doing one bad thing make you a bad person? I say, in a life of good, no. Additionally, if it weren't for Hitler repairing Germany's economy, they wouldn't be the economic giant they are today who helps to support the European union. Half of Europe might be bankrupt. 3. You can't blame Hitler for the extermination of the Jews -This one has several different reasons. A. The world has had a deep history of antisemitism. Almost every old European country has attempted to exterminate and/or excommunicate the Jews. Spain did at one point, the Roman Empire did multiple times, and others did as well. Even before Hitler's rise to power, Germany was facing much antisemitism. Hitler just rode the roller coaster, and the rest of Germany really went along with the propaganda Hitler used to come to power. Are you saying that much of Germany's population was less moral than you? That somewhat refutes your argument that what the majority of people decide is moral is moral. Hitler merely made camps for the Jews of Germany, the exact same thing the United States did to the Japanese because it was the "right" thing to do. In fact, are you from the United States? Because during world war II there were beatings and even public hangings of German peoples by Americans who thought they were doing the "right" thing. B. Blaming Hitler just because he was leader is like blaming Obama for the USA's obesity. Hitler may have been leader, but all he did was form labor camps for the Jews. He did not make their horrendous conditions, or commit the murders there. Why would he even make labor camps if he just wanted to kill all Jews? And why would he want to expend all those resources while he was fighting a war? The fact is all Hitler wanted was to win the war, because the Treaty of Versailles gave Great Britain and France free licence to bully Germany and drive them into poverty, going so far as moving their military into Germany's factories to directly take their products. If someone did that today, the United Nations would be all over it. Can you really fault Hitler for trying to stop the world's biggest bullies? I hope we can all see that Hitler has in fact been demonized by historians. He was just a German (well Austrian) man who tried to stop Britain and France from bullying the world and plunging his country into depression. I will admit the means Germany used may have been less than ideal, but doesn't the end justify the means? Overall, Hitler just did what he thought was right for the world and actually made many aspects of the world better. Who else can say they go that far to help the world?