The United States Defense budget should be decreased by at least $200 billion

I honestly think the burden of proof would be on both of us, because it doesn't seem obvious why we should be spending the amount we currently do, especially given the fact we spend more than $350 billion a year than any other nation and more than the next ten countries combined. If my opponent still thinks I should have sole burden of proof, I suppose I can still argue with such conditions since it seems blatantly obvious, given the points I am going to bring up, that we should spend less on military.The military is wasteful with its allocated fundsFirst, I wish to point out that there is massive waste that goes on in the military. Trillions of dollars per decade are wasted in the military for bureaucratic nonsense from the pentagon[1], to useless projects[2][3], to the military having to spend everything that is given to them or else they won't be approved for more money. Seriously, I've heard stories where soldiers have to fire all of their bullets before the end of the fiscal year so that they can be approved for new ones, if they instead were able to save those bullets, that would save some money. So, already nearly a hundred billion in military spending can be saved every year if we cut back on wasteful spending. There is easily 100 billion a year that is wasted by the military. If we cut back on this waste, we could cut the military budget by 100 billion. I'll point out where the other 100 billion will come from. Do we even need a majority of our military bases overseas? Next, I'll point out the the US military has bases all over the world that require maintenance. There is no good reason for us to be in those other countries for the most part. Let those countries defend themselves. The US spends over $150 billion a year on over-seas bases [4], and when was the last time we've had a war in Europe, for example? World war 2? We only need bases in the middle east at this point since that's all where we have enemies, so we can get rid of a vast majority of the bases we have, I'd say at least 2/3 of them, which is where the other 100 billion will come from(since 2/3 of 150 billion is 100 billion). There is really no good reason to keep these bases, for they are not necessary for us to protect ourselves which is all we should be worried about. If a war were ever to happen where our ally is declared war upon, we can simply ship our troops over there, and we don't need the bases to be there to be maintained every year. It is far cheaper to ship our troops when the time comes that we need troops in Europe, than to keep a reserve of troops there.Even with this decrease of $200 billion, we would still be the country which spends the most on its militaryThe very next country below us who spends the second most amount on their military, is China. They spend only $215 billion a year on their military[5]. If we decreased our military budget by the proposed $200 billion, we would still be spending $382 Billion, more than $150 billion than China spends.The money we are over-spending on our military, could be used for better causesThis money could be used for other more important things... such as paying off our debt or at least balancing our budget. It's insane how much debt the US has piled up, and everyone should be worried about our debt. We need to cut spending, or else increase taxes. I suggest cutting spending so that people don't have even more money stolen from them by the government. I've basically argued all of my points and I turn this over to my opponent.Sources:[1] https://www.usnews.com...[2] https://www.forbes.com... [3] http://www.wwfor.org...[4] http://www.mintpressnews.com... [5] https://en.wikipedia.org...