BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Rap Battle

Wow, mention my mom? What are you, eleven? That's a step too far though, since she resides in heaven. Passed on when I was six, you prick. Left a whole that I can't fix, Now I clench my fist. My sick tricks will twist your wrist, I'm pissed! Put away your dick. You tried to insult me, you missed. Yes, I'm in outer space, so close, think about a place Far away from here, nowhere near you or you pouting face. I know I'm destined to be the best, dude. No thanks to my dad, he fuckin left to. With nothing to lose, I choose to confuse you With words to abuse you, leave clues to amuse you, While I fuse true lines, about you like it's no news that you like dudes You want to fight me? I'll grip the mic tightly, smile with white teeth, You might see reasons why I'm not asking politely, I write these In my mind then I ignite trees by speaking, why am I battling spike lee? You think I'm crazy, but I ain't, I'll tell you this basically Face it, it's too late to see that you hating me is fake it seems. Since you just said when you see me, you pleasure yourself. Deny that if it helps.. is that a picture of me on your shelf!? You answered my lines, but then just stopped. Like you blocked a few punches before you got dropped. Pass the Mic back? I don't need your pitty. Out of my vicinity, You're my enemy, may be a fan of me, but you won't win it seems. I'm on the right mission, you can't light my ignition Or fight my ambition, this is me being polite, not dissin' So put down your dusty rap sheet, and take ten seconds to not fapp, please. Look me dead in the eye, you can't hurt me I'm dead on the inside My families gone. I can't fix that. Go ahead.. diss that.
Rap Battle

You must be blasting off, 'cause you're in outer space,you stepping to me's like an AK against Mace,Those jeans sound real cute, you care so much about fashion,You're like a new recruit, gettin' sick off these rations,of rhymes that are just too much for your guts,you're a lot like Asher Roth, you both lack nuts.Don't know what i stepped in? It thinks it's the Sh|tBut your rhymes lack the "the" that's the end of it.One verse can break me inside me? That's some metaphysical crap,You should spend less time in Kant's C*nt, and more on your rap.I can't stop you now because you haven't even started, Take Robert Downy Junior's advice son, Never go full retarded.I believe you're fully loaded, you sound like you've had more than a few,I know after the voting, you'll see that you're screwed.You make loading a pistol sound so complicated,You'd shoot your own balls off, if you weren't already castrated.And I don't know if I'm a man, but your mom seems to think so,She wrote me this next line, "God, my son blows."How can I not free-style? I'm answering your every line,If this was pre-written you'd see the divine,and yeah, I always masturbate when I see a pu$$y on the internet,I saw one in round 1, guess who that was yet?It doesn't count if your name your hand your "girl",it's still just your organ around which your fingers are curled.I rapped about soft things, because you're my subject matter,I'll let you step on, you're scared, pee is splattered,down the legs of your pretty little acid-washed jeans,You're battle is empty rage, I'm the machine.I'm passing this mic back, 'cause unlike you I'm polite,Try to use words that make sense, and rhymes that are tight.
Rap Battle

Listen kid, I'll be blastin' off while you're stuck jackin' off, In a pair of acid wash, bumpin' Asher Roth! You don't know what you stepped into One verse can break you from within you You can't stop me. Don't know What I've been through I'm getting started now, you wish to continue? I get fully loaded like the bullet slipped into the clip, And clipped into the pistol grip, fit into my fist Ready to fire at you, "a man", is that true? And yes, I spend less time writing 'cause I freestyle, Even pre-written, you rap like a weak child. And don tell me how I procrastinate. After all, it's you talking about how you masturbate. I've got my girl, don't need my right hand. And my verse it perfect, don't need a hype man!! You rap about cocoons and butterflies. Step aside, I'll battle the other guy. I've been done with you since round one, Want a battle? You've found one.
Rap Battle

(Parenthetical statements are things shouted by my Hype-Man) You've thrown down the gauntlet, I'll pick it up and jack-off into it, (YEAH!) Slap you with the back end and hold you down as I spit this sh|t. You call yourself "Cataclysm"? please, you're just a cataclit (Doesn't need to make sense, dawg!) a Catapiller not out your caccoon just yet, scared a bit? You're 17, dude, why the hell you trying to battle a man? You've spent less time writing than you have trying to impregnate your hand! (BIOLOGY!) And yeah, you could point out by now that all my verses don't scan, But I don't need them to in order to dominate this land. Now it's your turn to step up to this mic, After a pause to get the training wheels off of your trike (FIVE WHEELS!)
The utter silliness of god, thus proving god is not a god and why you should not believe in him

Are you ready? Are you ready? Adrenaline is pumping Adrenaline is pumping Generator. Automatic lover. Atomic. Atomic. Overdrive. Blockbuster. Brain power. Call me a leader. Cocaine. Don't you try it, don't you try it. Innovator. Killer machine. There's no fate. Take control. Brain power. Let the bass kick! O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA-O---------- Adrenaline is pumping Adrenaline is pumping Generator. Automatic lover. Atomic. Atomic. Overdrive. Blockbuster. Brain power. Call me a leader. Cocaine. Don't you try it, don't you try it. Innovator. Killer machine. There's no fate. Take control. Brain power. Let the bass kick! O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA-O---------- [Bass Drop/Solo] Let the bass kick! O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA O-oooooooooo AAAAE-A-A-I-A-U- JO-oooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- JO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA-O-
World War III Part 3

Part 3, this will be the last installment of this awesome series of debates, Pro = Armed forces 1) China Russia UK Saudi Arabia Egypt Syria and Lebanon Iran Poland Anybody else who hates Israel (If con can think of any he can use them to his advantage) Pro = Allied forces US (but on a limited scale as agreed before) Canada Germany Israel Belarus (invaded by Russia) Ukraine (invaded by Russia) Slovakia (invaded by Russia) Czech Republic (invaded by Russia) Denmark (close trade ties with US and Germany compared to UK and Russia) Latvia, Lithuania, Georgia, and Estonia http://en.rian.ru... ^ reasons why these countries would join my side
World War III Part 3

1. Israel can easily beat any Arab nation but 1,130,500 troops vs. 250,000 troops is just too much to account for. They have never been able to beat 1 million Arab troops or more because that is just too powerful. Overwhelming all of the accounts my opponent have mentioned, Israel would be able to whip the butts at 250,000 vs. 999,999 troops. But this is close to 5 times more than Israel's army. Never before has Israel been able to beat back such a huge number of troops and I agree that Israeli leaders are better than Arab leaders (even though they are still good) and that Israel has better technology (but Arab has more weapons because of all the combined countries) and more willpower. However, Israel can not repel such a huge scale of invasions with almost 5 times their size. See, Israel's extraordinary features which makes their army like able to beat 3 times the size. But over a million is just too much for Israel to handle. Israel would be barely beaten to the ground and lose their country to the Armed Forces. Also you added Iran's troops yourself so it does count. Also Iran and Pakistan can get through without causing much trouble. The U.S. would not have any any major response because they are still dealing with the Russian conflict and they just got done with the Korean conflict. For the Russians, my opponent still forgot U.K., China, and Poland. As in my last argument, I totally agree with my opponent's facts except that if U.K helped a whole lot, Poland did it's best, and China came over, they would easily conquer all of nations I mentioned, and Russia would still be in an okay position for resources. Also with U.K., Poland, and China helping to occupy the conquered countries, they can easily conquer and occupy without being driven to the ground. The Armed Forces will totally overrun all of the European nations on the Allied Forces. U.K. would have pretty good technology and be able to sustain the countries to compete well. I thank my dear opponent for continuing the best debate series ever and helping me improve my debating skills as you can see throughout the series. I urge the fellow voters to vote Pro and to enjoy reading this awesome series. Merry Christmas and God Bless You!
Kids cant be true, they always breakin their elbows and stuff

kids are really not true. like you need a warrant to look at a kid and theyre dumb. first off you should never trust a kid. cause they will break their elbows. second off kids cant be trusted because they will break their elbows. like kids act like theyre sad and theyre not like they break their elbows and act sad but they love breaking their elbows. so it's not fair. so you can't trust a kid. at all.
Burger King is healthier than McDonalds

You said ** Ok. We all know McDonalds TASTES better than Burger King, but which ones healthier. . The answer is Burger King. ** I will say this. I agree with you that McDonalds tastes better than burger king but, I have to say it is healthier also. Here is some facts about the menu from McDonalds and Burger King. This link has all of the main foods. I will post a view bits out of there but I will let you go look at the link. Nosense and me having to cut and paste. This link does a really good job. French Fries When choosing French Fries, most people opt for whatever they think tastes better. Is there a significant difference in the nutritional value of Burger King's French fries and McDonald's French fries? For a medium order of French fries from Burger King, you will consume 400 calories, 20 grams of fat, 43 grams of carbohydrates and 5 grams of protein. For a medium order of French fries from McDonald's, you will consume 380 calories, 13 grams of fat, 30 grams of carbohydrates and 2 grams of protein. Cheeseburgers Many are unable to resist a cheeseburger from either McDonald's or Burger King. McDonald's is constantly getting a bad wrap for how unhealthy its burgers are. Which is really the healthiest option? Well, McDonald's cheeseburgers contain 300 calories, 12 grams of fat, 33 grams of carbohydrates and 15 grams of protein. Burger King's cheeseburgers contain 360 calories, 25 grams of fat, 63 grams of carbohydrates and 6 grams of protein. Healthiest Option: McDonald's cheeseburgers are not only lower in calories, fat and carbohydrates, but they are also significantly higher in protein. . http://www.associatedcontent.com...
Burger King is healthier than McDonalds

Yes I believe McDonald's is healthier than burger king. If everybody including you will go to the link I posted Then you will see why. It is obvious that a veggie burger is going to be healthier than a big Mac. Everybody knows that. That is why I compared them to something similar. A veggie burger and a big Mac have to real contest. Go to the link. They are pared the right way. A veggie burger is not enough to make burger king healthier then McDonald's. McDonald also has salads and other more healthier foods then burger king. I have won this debate because my opponent has not offered any facts or proof of these facts. He has forfeited a round so he agrees with what I have to say. If you go to my link you will also see why I win.
the bible is not infallible

The Bible IS infallible. Just because the cherry pickers of today choose to turn a blind eye to God's written word does not mean that the Bible is not infallible. You have conformed to the ways of mainstream society, the path that turns away from God, but that does not mean that God approves. Your understanding of right from wrong has nothing to do with God's intentions. You can post as many Biblical examples that fly directly into the face of your own personal beliefs as you want, but disrespecting the most popular and the most published and the best-selling book of all time on the planet Earth won't change the fact that evidence speaks for itself. The Bible IS infallible.
That UBI should be implemented in the western world

Before I proceed to point out the multitude of flaws in your argument I would like to point out the fact that 'broad and illogical' is not how you should describe it, as an opener to a debate it is meant to be broad, and illogical will be disproved later in the argument. Now onto the rebuttal. Rebuttal Not Enough money in the US Not enough money for the people The argument that there would be not enough money in the US governments pocket to pay for everyone is true, to an extent. The US federal budget adds up to $3.8 trillion, this makes up 21% of the US economy. The government should merely Raise tax on private industry. I choose private industry because the money from UBI is not taxed which means that it will end up in private areas of the economy anyway. Additionally, private industry is not taxed enough now. This mixed with the majority of the welfare budget would come to enough money that will circulate in the economy. The idea that $10,000 is not enough money, may seem correct from a rudimentary point of view. However, with further research you can find that trials done in Finland, show that even for poorest when you give them $10,000 it helps encourage them seek out further funds and decreased poverty rates substantially. The idea that the homeless just spend their money on drugs and alcohol is actually false, and what the real result is that the richest one percent spend the most money on drugs and alcohol. So in conclusion the arguments you have presented as rebuttal are either misinformed or false, and my point still stands.
That UBI should be implemented in the western world

Hello ISDA, Before I proceed to point out the multitude of flaws regarding a USI system, I would like to point out that your opening argument is very broad and illogical. You define a Universal Basic Income system as '...the government [giving] EVERY citizen a base income of around $10 000.' Do you understand that for a country like America with a population count of over 323 million, the annual tax revenue, even if solely dedicated to provisioning a UBI system, would not be sufficient to provide every one of its citizens with that amount? Additionally, $10 000 a year is a completely insufficient amount for disadvantaged members of society. Even for the most basic living conditions (cheapest rent, cheapest food, etc.), it requires at least $30 000 annually to provide enough money for a non-working person to provide humane living conditions for themselves (providing they are mentally and physically healthy).
That UBI should be implemented in the western world

UBI is an undeniably good choice for the western world, as it eliminates extreme poverty and allows more economic freedom. For those who don't know UBI, or Universal Basic Income, it is where the government gives every citizen a base income of around $10,000 that you can spend on anything. The difference between this and normal welfare is that most public welfare goes by the system that you earn the amount of money from the welfare but any amount above and you lose said welfare, acting as a box as opposed to UBI which is a pedestal. This is because it acts as a base income that you can build off. This will be accomplished by abolishing most welfare projects. We must have UBI to ensure the ability of anyone to have a, although low, stable income.
That UBI should be implemented in the western world

You have still failed to identify my main point... a UBI system is not a feasible replacement for welfare. The truth is, ordinary middle class, working citizens in their prime working age range DO NOT require the payment from a UBI system. It baffles me how you have failed to understand why currently, there is no country who has even begun to seriously consider this. The only country so far to pass a referendum is Switzerland, in which it was rejected 3 to 1. You claim to be Australian, I am as well. However, in your last argument, you failed to tell me how I was misinformed on the Aboriginal debate. Over the last 5 years, I have worked closely with a school foundation providing not financial funds, but things such as toiletries and access to health and nutritional education to a small town community with a large percentile of Aboriginal residents. We have seen that these provisions seem to have led to a greater improvement in the overall health of the community and we have even begun to get in close contact with some of the elders. But, back to the UBI point, I will once again enlighten you on reality. The truth is, many citizens in civilisation are born disadvantaged. Some children have parents with a bad influence, others have faced abused as young children and in many cases, these people end up broken mentally the homeless people on streets living off welfare. It is not that they are lazy and refuse to work. They were never taught the work ethic and never experienced a feeling of belonging to our society. These are the members of society who require the help of welfare. You seem to be overly confident that you have found a feasible UBI solution. However, you fail to realise that if you, genuinely, had found a practical, feasible UBI solution, you would not be on debate.org arguing. The popularity of a notion is directly correlated to how practical and real it is for the rest of society.
That UBI should be implemented in the western world

As someone who lives in Australia and has personal experience with the Aboriginal debate, you are again misinformed. I will now lay out my rebuttal Rebuttal Popularity Difference between income card and UBI Abolish not refine Addressing your point on popularity. This debate is about whether they should do so, not how the government would get it through Parliament. Besides, your reason for the popularity was a $20,000 proposal. However, I am proposing a $10,000 UBI, which as logic entails is the correct amount of the budget. You pointed out that the income card doesn't work. This is true, but that is not what we are suggesting, isn't a card to control what you spend your welfare on, which is what an income card is, we are suggesting we give them money free for them to spend. You said that we should refine the welfare instead of replacing it with completely different system, however, the welfare program has been proven not to work as any amount above it's small benefit window and you lose the welfare leaving you with less. In conclusion, UBI is a better system, as opposed to normal welfare. This debate is not about getting it through Parliament, or what completely different systems do. This debate is about, what has already been proven as the better system, UBI.
That UBI should be implemented in the western world

Well to that, I will simply reply... Your first point is actually a very reasonable and valid solution, however, proposing such a tax reform and welfare slash would definitely NOT be popular with the public. This is evident in Switzerland wherein 2016, a UBI referendum was rejected. Trials are being run in many countries in Africa along with Finland, however, countries such as Australia and America have yet to seriously consider this. In Australia, a $20 000 UBI was proposed. The cost of this would be twice the current cost of the current welfare system. Additionally, regarding your point on homeless people and their spending, in Australia, there is a huge cultural debate on Aboriginal welfare. In fact, in many towns, the government has begun to introduce an income card/ food voucher system. The reality is, disadvantaged members of society in both America and Australia receive generously from the welfare system. These provisions are enough to provide basic housing, food and water. However, despite this, these people still sleep on streets and beg for money for food. Alcohol and drugs are a huge reason behind this. There is debate trying to push a nation-wide income card system for welfare receivers, however, this is argued to be a breach of human rights with no supporting evidence. The main problem is, there is lack of public funding to support an investigation which would be both lengthy and costly. In fact, if the government would manage (somehow) to pass a tax reform on private industries, the money would be much better off refining the current welfare system instead of abolishing it completely and replacing it with an impractical UBI system. The main aim of welfare is to aid disadvantaged members of society, not to make government money distribution equal.