This House Believes That Homosexuality Is Immoral!

Since no refutations are allowed, I'll just ignore my opponent's arguments and construct my arguments for this round.1. Homosexuals help adopt children...which is more moral than straightsStraights can just produce children, so they don't need to adopt the poor orphaned children. So straights are actually in this case more IMMORAL than gays. On the other hand if homosexuals want children they need to adopt, helping the public and the poor children, which is MORAL. In fact, no negative effects have been shown from gay parents' adoption [1], and in fact actually do quite well under homosexual parents. [2] Because there are more than 100,000 children waiting to be adopted [3], the homosexual parents will definitely do a lot good to the public and be MORAL instead of immoral. 2. It can't go wrong with gays.With straight people, young women tend to get pregnant without wanting to do so. In fact, the vast majority of teenagers have vaginal sex by the age of 18! [4] Not to mention 80% of teen pregnancies are accidental. [4] This is an IMMORAL act because the young women don't want to get pregnant yet they still got pregnant, so this would be widely dissupported by any rational person, and thus is IMMORAL. On the other hand gays cannot get pregnant no matter what, so getting children becomes a responsible decision rather than an accident. Furthermore it also ultimately prevents abortion, as accidental pregnancy leads to abortion. Therefore gays' sex activity would be more moral than straights', since straights can go wrong but gays can't.3. It should not be considered irrational, and thus should not be considered moralMany people think that because something is irrational, it shouldn't be considered moral. However I can prove otherwise. Homosexuality actually does not belong to the "immoral" category because unnatural sexual activity is the people's rights, the people's choice, and is universally accepted as NOT irrational, except for religious circumstances. [5] But even then, my source tell us that "those who distinguish morality from religion do not regard homosexuality, per se, as a moral matter." [5] Thus religious arguments are useless because they commit the strawman of not looking at homosexuality from a moral matter.4. Homosexuality is naturalI am almost certain Ajabi made arguments about how homosexuality is natural. Don't blame me if I "refuted" his arguments, I didn't read his opening so I don't know. Anyhow, homosexuality is natural because it began long long ago, way before it was opposed. Many ancient civilizations respected gays, and even accepted them. These include, but are not limited to, Azande [7], Ancient Egypt, Ancient China, Ancient Greece, and Ancient Rome. [6]Your argument, I am certain, is easily flipped over and destroyed with these positive evidence for my side. Even though I didn't read anything you typed up.Interested to examine and rebut your arguments next round, 9spaceking.[1] http://www.independent.co.uk...[2] http://www.apa.org...[3] http://www.adoptuskids.org...[4] http://www.teenhelp.com...[5] http://plato.stanford.edu...[6] http://en.wikipedia.org...[7] http://disciplinas.stoa.usp.br...