Ruthlessness is a positive thing in politics.

IntroductionI'll be debating for that ruthlessness is a positive thing in politics. I won't debate for that it's the "best" thing in politics, but that it's a positive thing either than a bad thing. I'll show that: a good politician prioritize effectiveness as the most important result, and also that a good politician is willing to get the best results to every possible LEGAL way for his country.Ruthless prominent people Genghis Khan: This guy might a bit farfetched to have with in this list, but he did conquer and did create the biggest empire of all time except the British Empire but they wasn't very big if they wouldn't colonize. However, that Genghis Khan was ruthless can show that for achieving good things for your country, for being bigger and better, you have to ruthless sometimes because that will gain the best result for your country and people. The quote below confirms that claim that he was very ruthless.“The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy and drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather to your bosom his wives and daughters.”-Genghis Khan Charlie Chaplin: Well he wasn't a conqueror or a politician, but he was a good entrepreneur. He came from nothing and became a legend. That he was ruthless shows that it's good for the entrepreneur, if you want to go from nothing to everything. Ruthlessness is a very positive thing. I've no true evidence that he was often very ruthless, more that he thought you had to be able to be it."This is a ruthless world and one must be ruthless to cope with it." -Charlie ChaplinThe men who built america: By this I mean people like, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carneige, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J.P Morgan and so on. John D. Rockefeller created the biggest business empire of all time, and he was notorius for being very ruthless. I know that all these guys did things that's illegal in todays society, but they laid the foundation of todays corporate America. Even here it shows that for anyone that is ambitious, the opportunity is being able to be ruthless, being able to do what it takes to reach your goal. I don't thing it's necessary to confirm those claims that they were ruthless, becuase they are widely known for being able to be ruthless.Why it important to being able to be ruthless when you want do go from something to everything: Above I've shown that ruthlessness is a positive thing for the entreprenurial guy, this explains why: "This is a ruthless world and one must be ruthless to cope with it." -Charlie ChaplinThe world we live in today will always contain ruthlessness, and also create ruthlessness. So if you want to get to the top of the food chain, you'll often receive ruthlessness, and then you have to be ruthless yourself. If not, you wont succed and that becuase he will have more options and will in the end make you go under. Ruthlessness is very positive becuase it gives you more options to choose from to get the best results, think of the world as chess: in a game of chess a non ruthless guy will choose from the normal options, but the ruthless guy has more options to choose from cause he his ruthless, and will do everything to win and reach his goals.Problems with a government not being ruthless: I'm a Swedish teenager, I'm active in a youth wing, and Sweden is a great example of what can happen if a governemnt isn't able to be ruthless, and I see it every day. Here we have what I would say is a socialist thinking, instead of do what's the most effective, you'll first look what people is having a bit of a tough time, then you'll focus on them and find them helpless and think that you have to help them. We have the most generous immigration policies in the world, and they really decrease our welfare system. First of all so do I think that good labor could be found in allowing exchange students to come to our country, and I'm not against any kind of ethnic group or so on. I have many friends that is from other countries, and I'm very impressed of good people coming from very hard social conditions who do find themself maybe a education or a job then supplies themself or their family. But not being ruthless in your immigration policies do more hurt them than it doesn't. Even if we take in a lot of immigrants. Plus that if we would do what is best, we would take in less immigrants, like decrease the accepting of immigrants by 50% and then increase the spending by 50%. We should help them, but we shouldn't cry for them.Israel: is a ruthless state. I'm backing Israel in the war of Gaza. Not becuase it's a ruthless state, but becuase I believe that the creation of the State of Israel is one of the best things ever happend. But the jewish people have always been subjects of anti-semitism, and the best way for them not to be is for the State of Israel to exist. Their biggest enemy and threat, the terrorist organisation Hamas is a terrorist organisation. They'll do anything do hurt a jew whatever they've done. But Israel is a subject to the whole middle east becuase they are always a target of the arabs their. But they can even becuase of that huge threat, protect their citizens and create a functional welfare system that is one of the best in the world. But to protect their citizens they have to be ruthless.