9/11 was a false flag event

I believe all the evidence shows that the Bush administration was behind the events of 911. To make it easier to respond i'll list the reasons in numerical order so that each one can be addressed. 1. The science behind the official report does not add up. NIST attempted to create virtual models depicting how the all 3 towers were brought down as well as the attack on the pentagon. The problem is that virtually every model they created lacked vital variables. For example: in the model depicting the pentagon attack, the planes were shown without the engines. The engines are the most durable parts of any plane and would have cause a devastating amount of damage but their model forgot them as well as the tail section. There were no holes punched in the side of the pentagon where the engines would have struck nor any damage from the tail and yet you can clearly see the damage in the twin towers. Bush also claimed that he watched the first plan strike the tower, however the first strike was not shown live on television. There was only one video that showed the first tower being struck and it was provided by a documentary on the New York fire department being filmed at the time of the attack. It was not shown on live televison. 2. When the country has been attacked, the primary objective for the secret service is to evacuate the president to a secure site and yet they simply left him out in the open where everyone knew his location. This means they were certain the president would not be a target. 3. War games were allegedly taking place on 911 and they sent the jet fighters off in the opposite direction leaving that portion of the skies unprotected at just the right time. By the time the FAA alerted the Air Force the fighters were too far away to respond in time. 4. Bush was briefed before 911 that terrorists were planning to use planes to attack the US. 5. Bush was actively seeking a way to invade Iraq 6. Bush and Cheney refused to testify separately as the commission requested. They also refused to testify under oath. 7. On the FBI most wanted list, Bin Laden was never charged with the attacks of 911. The FBI went on to admit that there was no evidence he had anything to do with the events. 8. There was an ongoing investigation attempting to discover how the pentagon was unable to account for 2.3 trillion dollars. The files needed for the investigation were housed in the section of the pentagon that was attacked as well as tower 7. 9. The FBI confiscated 84 surveillance tapes from the surrounding area of the pentagon. If a plane had truly impacted the pentagon as the official report claims there would be no reason to do this. In response to the following statement: "Seeing I don't neccessarily denounce Pro's claim, without proof, it's still speculation at best. And who would send the alleged missile and why? Is Pro claiming the U.S. attacked itself for giggles? For what gain? What motive would the U.S. have to attack itself?" 1. The plane was alleged to have penetrated several walls and the last one was still in a cylindrical shape. This means the plane was somehow able to maintain its general shape, meaning there should be a large section of the plane intact. No such debris was found, even NIST claimed the plane was mostly incinerated and the rest broke up into very small pieces. See pic below https://www.google.com... As far as the motive is concerned, I previously stated that from day one Bush was actively seeking a way into Iraq. 1. I have no evidence to prove that these people were lying, being threatened, or being bribed to give these witness accounts. However it is important to not that some of there stories do not make sense. Such as the taxi cab and the light pole. 2. No debris that would indicate a 767 struck the pentagon such as the wings, engines, or the tail were found. Evidence can be planted. The debris found on the lawn was small enough to be picked up by individual people. I gave examples in previous rounds of real plane crashes and the debris left behind. The photos prove that there was no plane that struck the pentagon. 3. I have no knowledge of Allyn E. Kilsheimer but his claim of holding the tail section is without any proof. The black box was allegedly found but the information it was supposed to yield conflicted greatly between the NTSB and 911 commission report. They tell two different very contradicting stories. The video evidence tells a different story from O'Keefes'. The physical evidence left behind in the pentagon confirms no plane hit the building. As I stated before the twin towers were undoubtedly struck by planes as the video evidence confirms. In both of the towers the general outline of planes could be seen but that was not the case in the pentagon. More to the point, if a plane actually struck the pentagon why would the FBI confiscate 84 recordings of that section of the sky. It's especially curious that every camera stationed atop the pentagon failed to capture any pictures or video of the supposed plane. Virtually every square foot of the pentagons perimeter is under 24/7 surveillance but for some reason they failed to capture a plane that literally flew right beneath them. https://www.google.com... https://www.google.com... And yet despite all these witnesses the physical evidence still tells a different story. Cadavers could easily be placed prior to the missile impact. There has been no DNA tests done on these bodies to confirm identities. One of the biggest red flags is the fact that the FBI confiscated 84 videos that were aimed in the direction flight 77 supposedly came from. If the official story were true why confiscate the videos? Why does the physical damage in the pentagon show the no plane struck the building. The damage in the pentagon does not match the damage seen in the twin towers. How is a Boeing 757 which is 45ft tall supposed to squeeze in the first floor and not leave wing or engine damage?