Black Privilege Is Real

I brought up the noun version of privilege so we can look at everything through all aspects and through all angles. Do you have any points that coincide with the noun version of privilege? If not, Then ignore this point. The first sentence of White privilege was the actual definition which was from Wikipedia. The second sentence I added in there on my own, It wasn't part of the definition but it went with white privilege and it's still on the same subject - which is the truth regarding white privilege. You act like I made up that definition, That's from Google. So you can't really pick apart from it too much, It just won't work. You also can't try to prove me wrong over a factual definition. These are facts. This is research. You can't deny facts. All you're making your own misguided assumptions. "you are making the claim that whites have a systemic privilege over black" I didn't make that claim. The definition states that. "instead I would state you gave me the definition and did not use to state inherent privileges that white people do have. " That definition states everything about the privileges white people have. "Black as the race is only identified in the color of their skin. " What? So Indian people, Or Mexican people who tend to have melanin and darker skin -- does that mean their race is black instead of Indian or Mexican? Black people - is a term used in certain countries, Often in socially based systems of racial classification or of ethnicity, To describe persons who are perceived to be dark-skinned compared to other populations. (Wikipedia) But black people are also light skinned. There are fair skinned black people. White people is a racial classification specifier, Used mostly and often exclusively for people of European descent. (Wikipedia) You can't separate white and privilege stating their definitions away from each other and using that as your argument. Not how it works. White Privilege has an official definition for itself. You used the noun version of privilege okay, This goes back to the very first point of my response. How did you reach the topic of skin color? And why do you keep saying brown and black people. It's just black people. For example, I'm a light skinned black person and my skin is brown. A person that's a different race than me isn't going to be like "Oh that's a brown person" when they see me. The race is just black people. Just like for white people, There are tan people and extremely pale people, Do they get differentiated? No. "Yes as in they are famous of a celebrated person" - Okay but some celebrities started from the bottom, They didn't have much money and they had a bad upbringing. But the slowly worked their way up to the top. They weren't "privileged" all of their life. There are some famous people/rich people blessed with loads of money and guess what? They can still get depressed and their life may turn bad whereas a poor person who has nothing can be happy and thankful everyday. No need to provide a definition of celebrity. I know what it means and I know what a celebrity is. "I am supposed to find sources that you used? " - I told you to look them up for yourself because for some reason DDO won't allow links, So even if I put a link down (like I did in Round 2) it won't go through. You even told me to put down a link differently if it's from a news network. And I assume your Merriam Webster definitions aren't going through because you are putting Merriam Webster in parenthesis. I have been giving sources this whole time, Sources, Not links. Even in Round 1 when I defined privileges. If I don't provide a link, It isn't intentional it's because DDO won't let me. So don't flatter yourself Mr. Conduct. Your job is to say what you mean and mean what you say, Point blank period. No one has to kiss your a**. I literally told you my reasons for having this debate, I said "Feel free to have a debate with me on this if you'd like, I wouldn't want this comment section to have a sh*t ton of comments. " And you replied back with "I will make sure to fill the comments if you do the same. " of course being problematic as you always are. I clearly let you know that I wasn't up for us going back and forth in the comments, But you intended to do so, Which is why I challenged you to this debate. In your same comment you said your opinion on "Black privilege" (My round 1) which seemed very clear to me and I had no questions so that's why I simply responded. You expect me to keep asking you questions on what you mean? I don't read minds. "If white privilege is a thing then black privilege is also a thing. " Negative. "basing a lot on a person's skin color" that's exactly the point. You can't run away from that. Stay with the facts and like I said (again) you can't separate those two words. Now you're doing the same with Black and Privilege? There's white people who have dark hair and eyes. "People who have an advantage of darker skin. " No, Another example that white people don't have to worry about - Us black people have to worry about the media portraying this idea that white is beautiful. And it makes a lot of women insecure, That's why they resort to skin bleaching. Making them not like their dark skin. Even Indians who tend to have dark skin as well does it. So that's far from an advantage. But lets not even get too serious on that because that's a whole other topic and I want to just stick to this debate. "anecdotal fallacy. " if that's the case then I was unaware and it wasn't intentional. The case about the black man stealing ribs happened a very long time ago. What is wrong with basing my argument from anecdotal evidence? The source I used was merely showcasing the difference between the two races, I wasn't going off of my own experience, So I think you may have to reevaluate some things and throw anecdotal "fallacy" out. About the man stealing the rack of ribs - whenever you get through, He got put in prison for half a century whereas (from your source) the billionaire who rapes his 3 year old daughter got probation. This only further helps my argument. None other than white privilege. Of course any source I send or anything I say you're gonna think it's fake or disagree with. Still haven't changed from the Naruto debate.