Resolved: Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) confirm common ancestry (evidence for evolution)

The very words you speak are impossible to know if they are true. You say we are related to a banana, but you do not know that. This may sound a bit iffy but it is also true. I can simply say "were you there?" By saying no would make your claim unstable just like that. By saying long words you expect to win over votes because the ignorant voters fall for long complex words. Were the true actually comes in simple form. There are different types of bananas but which animal is closes to being a banana? That you can not say. "It evolves by random mutations during reproduction" The only random mutation during sex is disease. There is no such thing as a good disease. The word disease means lack of ease. And would this mutation be a disease when only a few are mutations? The only positive mutation is where you are immune. And you can still carry the disease. This whole random mutation is not possible you body would need to suffer first before and that leads to death. I also said that asexual reproduction was before sexual reproduction so where is the catch. Is not asexual reproduction more efficient? All mammals are sexual. Where is the mammal which is asexual? "Because sexual reproduction introduces more variety, and more variety donates faster evolution." Would this not make the world harder if there is more variation roaming the world? You evolutionists say evolution the way you think is right. "Of course they're fully formed, they're not going to have 1/2 an eye sticking out of their 1/4 eye socket..." No I meant when the animal was alive. All fossils where fully formed to their species, when a new kind is found they know what species it belongs into straight away. Once back at the lab. When will be a day where a new species will be found and still that what relations would it have? Apart from "say" fur and warm blood? "To understand how this and considering the existence of sperm and eggs is simply impossible." I am aware how sperm and eggs are made, but to understand how it all evolved, well that is a mystery. And how can a mutation be so accurate? Why do we not have mutations today like that? Come on I know it takes millions of years but as humans there just be one. Never heard of one. It's a myth from my knowledge. The best proof an evolutionist has is the fossil record, with out that then they are ruined." Yeah with no fossils there would be no proof or any "proof". Seriously what the heck would you work off? Living creatures? Oh boy. Looks like somebody hasn't been as convincing as they should have been. If you taught chemistry to me I would be convincing, I'm just not. Evolution is a belief system. I am, in all my time reading debates on evolution, listening, watching and learning about evolution have not found a piece of evidence which says to me evolution is reality. Therefore I can not say evolution is science. Simple as. There is always an answer for both sides of the debates I choose creation. Well sometimes there is an answer. "Evolution" I can proudly say you have let me down. You did not refer to my argument on time started when Adam was made by God and thus no point in evolution. Evolution would be a wild guess into the unknown as it is. You are saying time has been where it has not. Only to have another stab at where we came from but God. Why can I not see evolution, why has evolution not showed it self to me like it has to you? Can you see where I am comming from? Reference: http://www.abovetopsecret.com...