BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Original Sin Never Happened

You said "If no one knows how the universe came to be is sit fair to turn to answers? Yes" If no one knows how the universe initiated, Is it fair to just make stuff up? Absolutely not! That is the most dishonest approach you can take. You said "I think the Bible was using life as a term which describes when God created the first soul in a "human person". Also, There is a lot of confusion about whether Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons existed at the same time. " Genesis clearly describes how God made Adam from clay and Eve from his rib. There was no mention of imparting a soul or anything like that. When you say, "I think the Bible", It automatically infers speculation and subjectivity. It either says it or it doesn't. There are a long list of absurdities and anti-scientific claims made in Genesis. I don't want to straw man this argument by diving into them, So I will try hard to keep this subject to Adam and Eve only. Multiple species can exist simultaneously, One doesn't have to go extinct before a second can exist. I don't know where you got that impression. The point I was trying to make was one species does not instantly give birth to another species. So there never was a first human (homo sapien). Nor was there a first Neanderthal. This alone disproves the Adam and Eve myth. You said "The point is: Nom one knows how the earth was formed. " This is wrong. Science knows how planets are formed. They can also see other planets currently forming in far away galaxies. I think what you meant here, Correct me if I'm wrong, Is that science doesn't know how the universe came into existence. This is true, No one does. You don't either. Having no evidence and just saying it was God/magic doesn't get us any closer to an answer. You said "I don't care what the schools say. A week for transforming the Earth isn't so far out of the reach. " You don't care about evidence or truth. Ok. I can't force you to be honest, But at least you admit you're close minded. You said "The universe was created in far, Far less than 1/8 of a second says the big bang. The two mass extinctions on Earth had chain reactions inside 7 days. Some processes are extremely short and some are really long. " The big bang is a description for what happened after the initial "spark". It's a point where the laws of physics break down. At the point of the big bang there was no earth for billions of years, So I don't understand your point here. There were no "short" processes that popped out an earth or life in a weeks time. I'm not sure what you're reading your information, But it's not scientific or reality based. The garden of Eden found? Come on, Seriously? I will pay you the compliment and assume even you don't buy this crap. I assume this was a joke (at least I hope it was). They also found Noah's Ark. It was hidden with a cloaking spell and required a level 55 mage to reverse it. I really want to have a discussion here, But all you threw at me was half literate keyboard smashed sentences, Subjective speculations and unfounded assertions.
Original Sin Never Happened

If no one knows how the universe came to be is sit fair to turn to answers? Yes I think the Bible was using life as a term which describes when God created the first soul in a "human person". Also, There is a lot of confusion about whether Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons existed at the same time. The point is: Nom one knows how the earth was formed. I don't care what the schools say. A week for transforming the Earth isn't so far out of the reach. The universe was created in far, Far less than 1/8 of a second says the big bang. The two mass extinctions on Earth had chain reactions inside 7 days. Some processes are extremely short and some are really long. The Garden Of Eden found https://www. Manataka. Org/page1073. Html
Original Sin Never Happened

You said "Well, In this case, Magic is considered a miracle by God, Which is fair to believe. You want to talk about Magic. A universe created by chance is 1 in 400 quadrillion. It is accepted that magical ingredients created life it is fair to turn to the Bible knowing this. " 1) Why is a miracle fair to believe? Can you explain the difference between a miracle and magic? Can you provide ANY evidence supporting magic that aligns with reality? I don't know how the universe came into existence or how life originated, And neither does anyone else. Anyone who pretends to is being dishonest because the real answer is - no one knows, Yet. There are working theories that may or may not be correct (multi verse, Abiogenesis, Etc). These are theoretically possible, But not yet provable. So my answer to these subjects is - I don't know and neither do you. One thing I do know and can prove is that it is certainly not the Genesis account. You said ""Human" is a very broad term. What is a human? Homo erectus, Homo sapiens, Cro-magnons, Or neanderthals" 2) I was referring to homo sapiens, Our species; however, The argument I made would work with any of the listed species you mentioned. One species does not just pop out a new species in a single generation. It takes numerous generations, And often isolation, For changes to accumulate enough where a the two lineages can no longer interbreed. This being said, There were never two homo-sapiens. At the point of our species there are estimated to have been around 2-3 thousand (give or take) homo sapiens. You said "The Bible doesn't deny this fact at all. "2 Now the earth was formless and empty, Darkness was over the surface of the deep, And the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. "" 3) The Bible describes the entire cosmos and it's contents being created in a week in the book of Genesis. This is common Christian consensus. Christian scholars have added up the ages of the characters in the Bible to produce an estimate of how old our universe must be. The general consensus here is around 4-6k years old. For the sake of argument, I'll give it 10 thousand years, It really doesn't matter either way. This is entirely anti-scientific in nearly every aspect. Our earth and universe is billions of years old. Back to you.
Original Sin Never Happened

1. Well, In this case, Magic is considered a miracle by God, Which is fair to believe. You want to talk about Magic. A universe created by chance is 1 in 400 quadrillion. It is accepted that magical ingredients created life it is fair to turn to the Bible knowing this. 2. "Human" is a very broad term. What is a human? Homo erectus, Homo sapiens, Cro-magnons, Or neanderthals In this confusion, It is fair to turn to the Bible. 3. The Bible doesn't deny this fact at all. "2 Now the earth was formless and empty, Darkness was over the surface of the deep, And the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. " And. . . The floor is yours again.
Original Sin Never Happened

You said, "Unfortunately, You are missing a lot of details. " Yes, I'm aware of all of that. The point I was trying to make was the woman bit the fruit in disobedience and was cursed for eternity. I was just summarizing. Here are just a couple reasons why it's not true. We can start here and see if we get any further: 1) Magic isn't real and anyone who thinks it is would be considered delusional. Examples of magic - talking snakes, *magic* fruit, Curses, Etc. 2) Evolution clearly shows that there were never only 2 humans. 3) In order to believe in the Adam and Eve myth and Genesis story, You must also be a young earth creationist, Otherwise you'd be cherry picking doctrines. The earth is much much older than 6-10k years old - like 4. 6 billion. The universe is even older - like almost 14 billion. Back to you.
Original Sin Never Happened

I look forward to a good debate. Unfortunately, You are missing a lot of details. Adam and Eve had great gifts. They couldn't feel pain, Hunger, Thirst, Bad emotions, Or death. This is why Adam lives to be over 900 years old. He existed that long before the story happened. Original Sin was getting rid of these gifts. This was the real purpose. The whole story is in the Bible so you need to explain why it's not true. So back to you
Original Sin Never Happened

According to Christian theology, The concept of original sin stems from the book of Genesis w/Adam and Eve. In this fable a talking snake convinced the woman, Eve, To eat a fruit from a tree that was forbidden by God. As a consequence for her disobedience, God cursed her and all her descendants for eternity with sin. The entire Christian doctrine is centered around this story. I assert that original sin never happened and that the entire foundation of Christianity self destructs as a result. I will let my contender have the floor first.
Poor schoolchildren should clean up after rich schoolchildren or go hungry

The following conversation could soon take place in publically-funded school playgrounds in Britain if they adopt the American system of humiliating kids who are entitled to free school meals by forcing them to clean up after the rich kids. Teacher: I say, you there. Yes you, you nauseating little peasant. You're the girl who gets free school meals, aren't you? Little girl: Yes, sir. Teacher: Your sort make me sick, you scrounging little urchin. Who do you think pays for your school meals? The school dinner fairy? No, it's the taxpayers, isn't it? Little girl: Yes, sir, but my daddy used to pay tax until he was crippled when the asbestos mine he was working in collapsed and crushed his arms. Teacher: So? He could still get a job as grape-treader, couldn't he? Little girl: Well, no, sir. When he threatened to sue the mine owners they sent some thugs round to our house and they smashed his kneecaps in with a sledgehammer. Now he can't walk. Teacher: But he can lie down, so he could still get a job as a draught-excluder in a posh house, couldn't he? The fact is he's a indolent, work-shy layabout just like you. Why haven't you got a job, you idle little prole? Little girl: I'm only seven, sir. Teacher: That's no excuse, you snivelling little oik. The American Republican congressman Jack King quite rightly said there"s no such thing as a free lunch and that poor kids should be made to clean up after the rich kids at school. Now, you pre-pubescent pleb, that rich boy over there has dropped the wrapper of his Charbonnel et Walker Marc de Champagne chocolate bar on the floor in front of him, go over and pick it up and, while you're down there, you can lick his shoes clean, which is all scum like you are fit for, you impoverished little imp. Little girl: But, sir, that's not fair! Teacher: Life's not fair. If you don't like it, go out and get a job and pay for your own school dinners. There are plenty of paedos out there who would pay good money for a bit of underage she-meat, why don't you go on the game? Because you're too damned lazy, that's why, you indolent little slapper. Now I understand there may well be an economic case for the Republican system of getting poor kids to clean the schools and using the money saved on janitors to give tax cuts to the rich, but this system marginalises kids from poorer backgrounds, sapping their self-confidence, and it also means they waste valuable time that could be better spent doing homework or playing sport. Call me a socialist, I don't mind, but I believe that all children in publically-funded schools should be treated equally and with dignity and respect, regardless of their parents' financial status, and it is certainly wrong to punish poor kids for being underprivileged by making them clean up after the rich kids. Thank you. Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
Feminism should end.

Very well, I will admit that my name is not Jennifer Lopez. Donald Trump has not been proven to be a rapist neither has Bill Clinton. How is Bill Clinton a sexual predator then? Citation missing! Killing a baby means nothing. If I've said it once I've said it a hundred times. Killing a baby means nothing. They haven't contributed anything to society and probably never will if they were going to be aborted. Many aborted babies are retards or downies and therefore would be a burden on society. Other aborted babies would have had whores or crackheads as mothers and no fathers present so they would've become absolute trash and they would have had to resort to crime. If one or two feminists throwing feces at police is feminism then I suppose one or two anti-feminists being homosexuals means homosexuality is anti-feminism. Every woman should support feminism. If they don't, its because they don't know any better. Women do get paid less due to pregnancy, clearly you missed my point. They get paid less because they can't come to work and because they will need time to take care of the child. Only 10% of men get kidney stones and that is not something you can compare to a baby. You don't have to live with your kidney stones for 9 months, you don't have to take care of your kidney stones and you don't need kidney stones in order to sustain human life on this earth. Everyone can get cancer, idiot. Fox News has brainwashed you, dumb little idiot. I am physically stronger than you are, I am mentally stronger than you are and I am smarter than you are. Fear me child. Donald Trump has ruined all of your diplomatic relations, repeatedly broken international law, bombed Syria based on allegations, made your nation the laughing stock of the world and raped women and children.
Feminism should end.

Dang, you talk a whole bunch of crap. I wish you would beat my butt, Jennifer Lopez. Let me ask you a question, two actually, how frickin' stupid are you to put Jennifer Lopez as your name and how fake is that profile pic? First of all, Donald Trump has never been proven to be a rapist. Yes, he did cheat on his wives, but, and yes, you predicted me saying this, but so did Bill Clinton. And Bill Clinton is a sexual predator. Two, "Killing a baby means nothing"?! Wow. You really are a sack of crap. I don't know how you got married or maybe that's faked, too. This might be a shock to you, but babies lives do matter. Not only Black lives. Or African American, sorry. Three, I never said that protesters throwing feces filled balloons at policemen generalized their whole gender. It is feminism. Feminism does not represent all of women. Not every women on earth supports feminism. Look at Judge Judy. Four, Women don't get paid less due to pregnancy. That is easily the stupidest argument to back up the wage gap I've heard in a while, and that's a strong statement. Men can get Kidney Stones, which is also terrible. Heck, we can get frickin' cancer. Listening to your stupid debate is cancer, so I guess I'm right. And while I'm at it, yes, I can be wrong on certain things, (After all, I am "just a stupid 14 year old"), but I know I'm right on this. Feminsim did support equal rights for women, but that is NOT what it is today. And by the way, I listen to and watch Ben Shapiro, Steven Crowder, and Fox News, so go suck one. And Donald Trump has helped this nation a lot by bringing the market back up, creating more jobs in 1 year than Obama did in 8 years, and ACTUALLY trying to stop school shootings from happening by passing laws. And frick you for saying you'd whoop my butt. You need to stop talking all this crap behind the computer and do it in real life.
Feminism should end.

Not surprised that the only anti-feminists here are 14-year-old boys. I wish I could meet you so I could smack you and teach you that grown men support female rights. Feminism is not built off of man-hating, it is built off of the desire for equal rights for all genders. You need to provide a credible source if you're going to claim that a massive movement is based off of the hating half of the world. The main argument for the reason of feminism is not the wage gap, it is the inequality that still exists today and the wage gap is just a part of that. The wage gap has been disproven by taking into account why women don't get paid as much. One of the reasons is pregnancy. So women shouldn't get paid as much because they have to go through something terrible like pregnancy and childbirth? No, they are going through something more difficult than us men. They should get paid more. "In protests, feminists will put feces in a balloon and throw it at police." How many feminists have you seen doing that? Huh? Generalizing much? This is the problem. Whatever a woman does it gets blamed on her entire gender and dumb 14-year-old boys like you are too stupid to realize that not all women are the same. I would beat the hell out of you if you said this to my face. I would make you eat those feminist feces. Yes it is the woman's body. How is the fetus a person? It can't think, feel or reason. It doesn't realize that it is alive and it has no fear of death. Why should the woman have to deal with being fat for months and then going through an extremely painful childbirth? Killing it will mean nothing, it will be good for the world overall because an aborted baby is unlikely to have a very good life anyways so it would just take up space and contribute to climate change. Not that you would believe in climate change, dumb Trump supporting kid. Rape culture is very real and Donald Trump is a rapist. Accept it, kid. I assume you will freely call Bill Clinton a rapist based on allegations but suddenly your mind changes when it comes to the rapist Donald Trump. And because you are 14 and dumb means you don't understand anything that is going on despite trying to follow it by watching video clips of Milo Yiannopoulos and Ben Shapiro. You are easily brainwashed and too stupid to understand that other people feel differently from you. Too stupid to understand that you can be wrong. Too stupid and too young to understand anything. Too stupid to understand that if you say these things in person you will get your little 14-year-old butt raped.
Feminism should end.

First of all, Feminism is built off of man-hating. This is fairly obvious, especially in modern times. Two, Feminism lies about problems. The main argument for the reason of feminism is the wage gap. But, this has been disproven MANY times, and if you still don't believe me, than look up the Equal Pay Act of 1963. Three, feminists are very disgusting as of protests. In protests, feminists will put Feces in a balloon and throw it at police. Four, the abortion and my body, my choice argument for feminists is wrong. The baby has its own heartbeat, own face, head, legs, arms, feet, toes, fingers, etc while inside you. It is not your body, rather the BABY'S body. And five, the rape culture and the #metoo movement is mostly faked for money. We have seen this in the accusations on Donald Trump and in the insane amount of accusations on celebrities. And just because I'm 14 and "dumb" doesn't mean I don't pay attention to what's going on in modern day politics.
Batman Vs. Ironman

I would refute both points that my opponent offer. Also, I to believe that Batman would win. I will however be more then happy to play devils advocate. *1. Even with out suits and utility belts and what not, Tony Stark would still win. Tony had implanted directly into his nervous system a suit called the ' bleeding edge armor' Tony can control this suit with his mind, therefore, having a suit on him at all times. *2. The main iron man suit ( forgive me, the name currently eludes me) can withstand localized EMPs ( EMP grenade being a example) a similar circumstance were this happened was when the winter soldier attempted to use an EMP situated in his mechanical arm to neutralize iron man. The suit responded before the pulse could reach the suit by switching to alternative power sources and blocking all vital energy compartments effectively preventing any damage.
Batman Vs. Ironman

I am going that Batman would win. My first argument will be taken from the side of without any suit or any piece of equipment besides normal clothing (jeans and a t-shirt) Batman would hands down win. He would quickly disable Stark. Iron Man is nothing without his suit. Batman, however, was trained by the freaking master of a league of assassins. Without any equipment, Batman would win. *Point 2: Batman has an item called an EMP (Electro-magnetic pulse) grenade. This effectively shuts down any electronics in the area. This would disable Stark's suit and all Batman would have to do was use his acetylene torch to either burn Stark to death or cut him out of the suit in which case Batman would win (see point 1). These are my starting points.
Batman Vs. Ironman

1. You say he could always have a suit of armor on him yet in the third Iron Man, he went without a suit and with a bunch of makeshift stuff. Saying he can always have a suit it not right, especially if he was without the makeshift weapons. Even with those makeshift weapons, he is fighting a man trained by a master of The League of Assassins. There is no way that he could be beat. 2. Iron Man never fought the winter soldier as far as I remember. I cannot find a single reference with any back up to support that. 3. Batman also has a Energy deflector, created by Fox to deflect energy based attacks, nullifying many of Ironman's weapons. If you want to look at his sniper and missile, batman can easily 1. Call bats and disappear, making his snipers innefective and he can easily move fast enough to prevent Iron Man from getting a lock with his missiles.
Dinosaurs and the Bible

Hi Thoht thank you for debating me and putting your impressive record on the line the 1-0 truly astonishing. You said 2. The Bible can be referred to showing that Dinosaurs and Man lived together. My response Firstly to everyone reading I don't believe that there is proof for my beliefs, I believe that that the evidence points to my beliefs. The Bible says Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. KJV And in Exodus 20:11 11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is Which includes the animals and Humans so that's where the bible hinted that we co-existed which means man and dinosaurs lived together.
Dinosaurs and the Bible

I will need some clarification so that we may start in round 2. I'm sure you'll clarify everything perfectly there. We can only really debate one idea at a time, so you will have to choose one of these: 1. The Bible is Historically and Scientifically Accurate (You are Pro) 2. Dinosaurs and Man lived together at the same time. (You are Pro) 3. Dinosaurs did not exist millions of years ago, but within the last "X" amount of years. (You are Pro) 4. The Bible can be referred to showing that Dinosaurs and Man lived together. (You are Pro) I will happily do all four, but with the debate.org settings settling on one topic for one post seems to make more sense. I will hold my evidence for when one topic is chosen. Happy to debate with you.