Christianity is more peaceful and tolerant than Islam

ROUND ONE. FIGHT! I had to. Now, Christianity is not more peaceful than Islam. On point one, the affirmative posits that most Muslim countries are failed states. This is true by number of countries, but not by population of Muslims living in said countries, all "failed states" as you call them, predominantly in the Middle East, have more problems than Islam contributing to their failures, the situation with Israel occupying Palestine for example. Point two is factually invalid, the bible condones all sorts of violence, the stoning of women who have sex before marriage, slavery, and that doesn't even start to account for the multiple genocides, plagues and downright unpleasantness of Yahweh in the Old Testament. The bible even condones eternal fire for thought crimes, to argue that it is nonviolent to punish people for eternity for having the wrong belief is illogical, it is exactly what the radicals from all religions hold to. Charity is not specific to religious organizations, for example, Amnesty International, arguably the best charity, is adamantly secular. I concede that the bible promotes this in the New Testament, but it is not logically sound to say that good people do good things because the bible tells them to. As you stated, "Christian" nations are statistically wealthier, and have more disposable income to donate to charities, an American or Australian citizen doesn't have to worry about bombs dropping in the night, it makes it much easier to help other people. The religious freedom clauses you speak of were instituted by people who believed in secular society, the freedoms you speak of are not there in African Christian nations, such as Uganda, where American Christian Evangelicals, converted the population, and now they kill Muslims, gays and basically anyone else they can find a justification for in the bible. I have no real contest to point 5, as I think I covered it in my previous argument. Sharia is not followed by the 200 million Indonesians, nor does it hold weight in Malaysia, the two highest Islamic populated countries, yes Sharia is oppressive, but so are the premises of the Old Testament, and a lot of the New, the reason Christianity is in the "progressive" state it is now is because after the Crusades and the Inquisition, society realized the pervasive influence of the Church and sought to prevent such atrocities in the future, thus secularism was born. I refuse to debate about the differences between Jesus and Muhammad, I don't think either existed, nor do I think that either of them can be looked to for moral guidance, they are caricatures of different times, Islam as an offshoot of Judaism happened as a reaction to the growth of Christianity and its influence in the Middle East pre-Crusades. I will make one point regarding your assertions about killing in the name of "Christianity". The premise of the New Testament is "don't kill for God anymore, he'll deal with everyone who doesn't believe, and He will deal with them for eternity" that is pretty messed up as a message to send to non believers. On the other hand, can you disregard all the killing King David did? Samson? Even Jesus said to trade your robes for a sword when it is time to fight for God.