Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest.

It would seem Pro has given up on his argument trying to prove the stupidity of everyone. I shall remind you of the title Pro:" Just proving how stupid everyone is, not to be mean, but to be honest."You said you are proving this. Proving means providing information. If you are going to rattle off random statistics about the world then you need to show that this is true. Whether you took this poll, you need to show us where your findings are. If you found this from a website, or book, you need to tell the voters and myself where you found this information.That is political nonsense, or stupid arguments (as you claim I am making) that is common sense.Unless you feel spouting off random statisics without proof has meaning in this debate?97.863% of all monkeys enjoy having coitus with birds. 42.574116813% of MY time is spent flying around the moon with my superpowers78% of people type every letter on their keyboard with their nipples.100% of people are NOT stupid.I hope you are understanding how pointless uncited statistics and facts are. I don't need to cite these facts because you haven't. My last statistic outranks everything in this debate. Regardless of how you see the world. Or whatever sounds, colors, and vibrations 'tickle your fancy', if 100% of people are NOT stupid, and you are trying to PROVE they are stupid, you just lost pal. You say I have a misunderstanding of this topic? How? You are again making blanket statements without any proof. You try to being this debate by "sounding" philisophical by stating the world is full of colors and sounds and we are geysers of emotion and inspiration. All of that means nothing. I have shown we are not stupid by the inventions we have today, the people put in careers to advance society through technology, philosphy, art, math, science, et al.You are choosing not to debate....on...a....DEBATE.....WEBSITE.I have told you in the past you need to post these in the forums. Especially if you are going to get your undies in bunchies every time I challenge you to make your point. I will never get sick and tired of proving you wrong. These "profound" statements you make about the world, and the unvierse, and about uni-directional nonsense is quite humorous. All of it means nothing.You're biggest gripe, mentioned in this debate as well, is the black and white view on the world.However, what you call black in white, is jsut opposites. There are trillions of options of opposite nature. Why is it "black and white"? Why not:Red and BlueYellow and GreenPurple and PinkOff White and WhiteEggshell and BeigeMacaroni and CheeseEggs and BaconSurf and TurfSome may not be opposites, but my point is fully made. People have these options, people think of these options on a daily basis.People may not adhere to YOUR view of the world that everything is on a universal scale, or whatever it is you think, but to claim people are stupid AND their views on the world are miniscule, ignorant, and simple-minded.... in fact makes you all of those things.I am baffled you still choose to debate these things, as they are incoherent rants of nonsense. My debates are normally opinions based on facts. Which yes have a certain structure and standard.However, in this debate, I have only used one source, which was to define a word. I have based everything else, anything worth merit in my arguments, off of raw emotion and my views on the world.If you are choosing to just give up because I have beaten you, yet again, by showing why everyone is NOT stupid, both 'poltically' and philisohpically' then please just forfeit next round.If you choose to refute any of the points I've made in the last round, well you better giddy up, because you have a lot of work to catch up on.