An omnipotent metaphysical god cannot exist

Thanks for accepting, Garret. Yes, I have the burden of proof. The whole point of the debate is to have someone challenge my argument so that I can fing flaws and address them. We'll just see how many rounds it takes. I will start from the assumption that there exists an omnipotent metaphysical god and try to reach a contradiction. Here we go: There exists a physical world. We, humans, exist in this world; we are part of it; we are physical entities. However, we are limited by our own nature. If there is a metaphysical world, then we cannot percieve it in any way. We cannot even reason about it because it does not maniphest itself in our spectrum of understanding. For example, the quantum fluctuations [1] from which physical particles appear are also in the physical world. Contrary to what L. Krauss states, that these "virtual particles" are "nothing" from which "something" comes, they interact with the physiscal world so they are part of the physical world. Similarly, should our universe be part of a multiverse [2] the multiverse is still part of the physical world because there are some suble interactions. Otherwise there would be no motive to reason about them. Now, a god that is omnipotent over the physical world would litterally be able to impose any wish onto anything in this world, including humans. Some religions that promote beliefe in such a god state that the god has given humans free will. This means that it allows us to think for our selves, even though it could force us to take decisions as it desires. I claim that a metaphysical god cannot prove it's own existence to all humans. I set aside the religious people that already believe (unfoundedly). This god could not prove its existence to a skeptical atheist. In order for the god to prove that it is indeed a mataphysical omnipotent god to a human, it must provide the evidence/proof in the physical world because that is where humans reside; that is where they think and reason. Any evidence must have a physical nature for the humans to percieve it. But there cannot be any physical evidence for the metaphysical world because the correlation cannot be percieved. Another way this god might try to prove it's existence is by breaking the physical world. A miracle (raising the dead, walking on water) is said to be an intervention from the metaphysical into the physical in such a way that what we percieve becomes contradictory with the laws of the physical world. However, this can be easily discredited as bein simply a result of what we do noy understand yet in the physical world. In order to differentiate between the physical and the metaphysical we need to be able to draw a clear line between them. This implies that we must know everything about one of them (the physical) to know where it ends. We know that we don't know everything so we can always speculate that a miracle is nothing more than an unexplained phisical phenomenon. So a metaphysical god cannot prove it's own existence to a human from the physical world. Thus it is not omnipotent over this physical world. (It could alter the brain of the human to make the human think he believes in the god, but this is not a proof. This would be imposing the beliefe. The god has no way of proving that it is indeed a metaphysical god.) So a metaphysical god omnipotent over the physical world cannot exist. [1] http://www.icr.org... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org... By the way, Garret, you we correct that 10.000 chars are excessive.