The purpose of all things in motion is to seek balance

I will first address Con's previous statements. Con: "First of all, if something is balanced, then it is not whole or "perfect" therefore proving premise #3, in which there is a WHOLE (not two seperate parts)." I disagree. If something is balanced, then it IS whole or "perfect". If something is balanced, it has achieved equilibrium. This can be exemplified as a perfect symmetry (balance) between opposites. Con: "We are merely a broken off concept from the whole as pairs in our enviroment." I'm not sure what you mean by this assertion, or how it applies to your position. Please elaborate. Con: "We could have broken off into quads or negatives, what would our enviroment look like then?" Who knows? A lot of thing could of happened. I prefer to define what I think DID happen. Con: "There are infinite possibilites when dealing with the WHOLE thereby proving again the legitimacy of premise #3." You have referenced "premise #3" a few times now, and I am still not sure what you meant by it. To reiterate: Con: "3: 'Balance' is irrelevant to matter but we have to factor it into our thinking because of the way we developed in our enviroment (Survival)." What exactly do you mean by, "'Balance' is irrelevant to matter..."? Regarding the rest of the premise, are you trying to say that we invented the idea of balance in our minds as a form of survival? What do you mean by this? What exactly is your argument? How does it negate my examples of balance in the physical world provided below? These examples aren't man made. I will conclude this debate by providing examples of balance in the physical world. Elements The entire Universe is made up of building blocks that scientists refer to as the periodic table of elements. The only difference between each object (e.g. plastic vs rubber) is the arrangement, or combination, of those various elements. The next obvious question would be, why do these elements arrange themselves in different ways to create different things? What causes different elements to be drawn to one another? The answer is balance. The elements are made of atoms. Atoms cling together because of a process called, ionic bonding. Essentially, this is the process of atoms balancing their electrons and protons.. Example: If atom A has 3 protons and 1 electron, and atom B has 4 protons and 6 elections, they will cling together if they become close to one another. The reason they cling together is because as a whole (if you add the protons and electrons between A and B) you get atom "AB" with 7 protons and 7 elections. As a pair, they have achieved an atomic balance that was missing before they connected. They were driven by their desire to seek balance. This is a very simplified explanation of ionic bonding, but it suggests that the primary motivator between molecular arrangements is the desire for atoms to balance their protons and electrons. These atoms are dancing all round us at this very moment. They are searching for the dance partner that balances them. The partner that gives the couple an equal amount of electrons and protons (two opposite, yet equal forces). Weather The two most commonly known opposites in weather are cold and hot. Cold air is classified as high pressure (dense), hot air is low pressure (light). Cold air always moves into warm air to balance the pressure levels. Simply put, cold air has more particles than warm air, so cold air spills in to fill up the emptiness in the warm air. It's like water being poured into a pot. It distributes itself evenly amongst all the areas absent of water. This is clearly an act of natural balance. Hot and cold climates dance with one another on massive scales creating large wind and weather patterns. Once the low pressure system has been filled up and balanced by the high pressure system, an equilibrium is reached, and the air becomes still and calm. Osmosis Osmosis is the spontaneous net movement of solvent molecules through a partially permeable membrane into a region of higher solute concentration, in the direction that tends to equalize the solute concentrations on the two sides. -Wikipedia Similar to weather, osmosis is an act of balance. It also explains why we prune up in the pool or tub. Our skin acts as the membrane as the water in our bodies is pulled through our skin into the pool until the solute concentrations are balanced. The water being pulled out of our bodies is what causes the skin to shrivel up. Physics I am not a physicist, so I do not understand the forces and equations of physics; however, I do know that one of the most famous physicist of all time, Sir Isaac Newton, said, "For every action, there is an opposite, yet equal, reaction." I couldn't agree more! Economy (could also be in the human behavior section) The acting opposites in economies are supply and demand. When they are in balance, a company, industry, state, or country can run at optimal efficiency. When supply begins to outweigh demand, you have a surplus. When demand begins to outweigh supply, you have a shortage. These imbalances prompt action. When there is a surplus, prices must be lowered to generate more demand. When there is a shortage, prices must be raised to maximize the supply. Both actions are an attempt to reach an equilibrium between supply and demand. The concepts of supply and demand can be attributed to the work force. Mathematics What is the most common symbol in mathematics, that can found in every single equation without exception? An equal sign. Think about what that equal sign represents in any given equation. It represents balance. It symbolizes how one side of an equation can be different, yet equal, to the other side of the equation. Both sides of the equation can be manipulated in a variety of ways, so long as those manipulations respect the rules of balance implemented by the equal sign (what you do to one side of the equation, you must do to the other). There could be much more said about balance and mathematics, but I am growing tired with these definitions, as I'm sure you are with reading them at this point. I will close by thanking Con, and any viewers and voters, for partaking in this debate. I believe my position to be true, regardless of my ability to verbalize it effectively. My objective was to provide enough well rounded examples of balance, both internal and external, macro and micro, to persuade readers that achieving balance is a highly probable motivator of all things in motion. It is my best attempt at a "universal philosophy," and my hope is that just one of you, maybe, took something away from it. Thanks again for reading and/or participating.