Drugs must be made legal

"You also said that you provided a list below of ten crazy things people do for charity, I saw no such thing."At the very bottom of my round I left four links; that was one of them. Sorry if I was not clear. Like I said before-- some of these are far stranger than taking drugs (http://www.oddee.com...). "The only physical efforts to take a Drug for the average person are..."That might be true, but I never said the effort was more difficult. I said in the last round, "Effort made to do something should have absolutely nothing to do with how 'bad' something is for you." Which is true. Taking drugs is just as dangerous as climbing a mountain; one's just easier. But the danger level remains the same, albeit different."Those who climb mountains for charity all would wear protective suit."And I could use just a little bit of heroin. These things are still comparable in that there are precautions, but the risk is still there."Your point is to prove that alcohol is much more dangerous than drugs but that is not true..."I provided a link to a study that found that alcohol is more harmful. This isn't a matter of opinion; the research is there in black-and-white. I'll provide the link again so you can read it yourself (http://www.theguardian.com...). I will now address each of your reasons why it's "not dangerous"."It is used for personal entertainment" So is heroin and crack and marijuana. These are all forms of entertainment, and your reason has no ground."The reason all the Americans were annoyed about alcohol being taken away was because it was much less dangerous than Drugs"I addressed this in the last round as well: People were mad because their drug of choice was taken away. The same way an addict would be mad if someone took his stash away. He's not mad because crack isn't dangerous; he's mad because his drug is gone. Alcohol is a drug, and it is dangerous. "It would take weeks (depending on how much you take) for alcohol to kill you whereas drugs would take hours or days to say how strong it is."Alcohol poisoning can kill you in a matter of hours. In England, 700 people a week are treated for it. 350+ people a year die from it. (http://www.drinkaware.co.uk...) "And if drugs were made legal I fail to see how it would stop drug dealers from thriving." The same exact way crime rates, homicides, prison populations, and bootleggers went down after Prohibition, that's how. "If the government were to allow drugs to be made they would have to make sure that the factories would make tiny quantities otherwise they would not doing their duty. Why I disagree is because if an accident happens in the factory it could result in some ones death."I had to reread this several times. That doesn't make sense. Are you implying the workers would be stealing and using the drugs during work? That's idiotic, frankly speaking. Those who produce alcohol don't get drunk on the job. Those who produce condoms don't have sex on the job. Those who work at McDonald's don't eat Big Macs on the job. Why would these factories be different? "Besides what does it matter whether the government gives you drugs and you die or if some drug dealer gives it to you."It's a major difference, actually. In the same way bootlegged alcohol (or moonshine) is incredibly dangerous for you, street drugs are similarly harmful. When the government gets involved, they can put limits on a drug's effects, tax the hell out of it, and make sure no-one has too much in their system. With all these newfound regulations, drug use becomes safer and more beneficial to society."I never agreed to your point about putting whatever substances in our system."Yes you did, though! I quote: "But you are right saying that we can do whatever we want putting in substances in our bodies..." Right there. You followed this with a quote about how you take issue with giving money to drug dealers. This is remedied by making it legal. Boom! No more drug dealers. It would be more comparable to giving your money to the cashier when you buy beer. Do you consider him to be a shady alcohol dealer? No; he's just a cashier. Those who would dispense drugs would follow suit.Hopefully I made the links more visible this time. If you take issue with anything in the previous round, the links are there too.