Believing in God is the same as believing in the Tooth Fairy, Santa Clause, and the Flying Spaghetti

Pro, you seem very frustrated. Let's go through this step by step, and maybe we can show you where you are having problems. "Your argument in Round 1 is so confusing" That's why I put a lot of citations and sources, and easy to watch videos to help explain the definitions I will be using. Be honest with everyone, did you even watch the short videos? I'm sorry if big words scare you, but defining important terms essential to your argument is DEBATING 101. "...talking about aseity and what not and jumping to the Bible" Actually, I did not cite the Bible once. And yes, the reason why I am taking the time flesh out what "Aseity" is, and what my definitions are, is because I do not want there to be an equivocation of terms. When atheists talk about "gods" they are not talking about the same concept of God that Catholics believe in. The conversation goes no where unless both parties are using the word in the same meaning. You just seem upset because you don't understand the term, but you thought you did, and your argument fell apart. "This is not a debate about the truth of Christianity" Nor do I intend it to be, but rather demonstrating that believing in an observable CREATURE, as you put it, is not the same as believing in something that cannot be observed, though it exists (like abstract concepts). You're either not understanding that, because you're frustrated, or you are intentionally misrepresenting my arguments. "...and I will mostly be debating based on what I know. In other words, I am too lazy to provide any links." Translation, you cannot be BOTHERED to back-up what you "know" or do any research on your own. Your laziness shows, and you should be embarrassed. Are you that arrogant that you think you can win by showing us what you "know"? "You then go on to say how we can observe some things and how we can't observe some things. Bla bla bla. Yeah, of course you can't observe numbers. It doesn't mean it doesnt exist. It's a concept that helps us deal with everyday transactions and life in general. Is believing in numbers the same as believing in God? Of course not. A number is a concept or a tool that you use. A God is not a tool. You are literally putting your trust in something that as you say is beyond the scope of human observation." HAHAHA. You literally agree with my argument here, even though you are too frustrated to realize it. "Is believing in numbers the same as believing in God? Of course not!" Yes, because believing in something that can be observed is not the same as believing in something that cannot be observed. Thanks for conceding! God IS beyond the scope of human observation with empirical science. Science cannot comment on the existence of God one way or the other, just like it cannot comment on the existence of "sorrow" or "independence" or "numbers". So when you say basically, that is believing in something that CAN be observed the same as believing in something that CANNOT be observed, you are PROVING MY POINT. Thank you. Furthermore, the whole point of R1, which you found so confusing, was to illustrate the difference between the CREATURES (as you named them) and the concept of GOD. "You finish off by saying I am too lazy to read a debate that's thousands of years old. Yes, I am. You are also obviously too lazy to bother explaining it, instead just merely copy and pasting some articles and some youtube videos for us to watch. How convenient. Despite all this, you are proud of your so called intellectual capacity. Using terms and phrases that sound so fancy so that you appear to know more." Maybe if you even read what I actually wrote, and took it in, you would see that I explain it. And then explain why your'e wrong. And then read this Round, and see why you actually end up agreeing with me. Thanks you playing.