Refusal of understanding, Proving the game is not fact.

Lets debunk this. Proving a fact: The predominant manner of establishing fact is through evidence. In fact, almost all manners of proof require some amount of evidence and the real distinction is the proximity of the evidence to the fact at issue. Facts are established by: Direct Evidence. evidence G2;ɛv=8;d(ə)ns/Submit noun 1. the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid. Source 1: http://bryan-mullins-the-roast-game.wikia.com... Is nothing more than a link to a wiki search page. This proves that Bryan tries to use his own created content as proof of fact. Source 2: http://www.debate.org... Can not be used as evidence of fact because though the debate was "won" by the one voter, the reason for winning was not a winning of debate but simply because the challenger did not debate. No facts were stated, no evidence was stated, nor any reports of any kind to back up the claim of the game was given in the debate. It can be seen in the vote tab, the voter agreed with con, before and after the debate. Source 3 is a link to a google search of Bryan Mullins own created content. This is not proof or evidence of the roast game being fact or real to begin with. Source 4 being a youtube video created by Bryan Mullins, showing a lot of claims, none of which have any links to show where the information comes from, no police reports of "children being eaten", nothing to back up any of the claims made in the video. Absolutely nothing. Source 5 being another link to another debate where once again, the claims are made, but there is nothing there to back the claims up beside the same links given here to his own created context. Source 6 being a link to a poll where one voter is the creator of the poll, his vote is biased, although counted by the system, it should be void, which makes it an uneven voting system of 9 people, 2 of which voted yes are clearly ridiculous jokes. This again, proves nothing but that there are jokers on DDO. Source 7, another poll about whether the "roast game" should be thought in schools. This is straight up bonkers. If every member of DDO actually voted on these polls, then it might mean something. This sight is not being maintained by administrators any more. The "roast game" relies on a very specific answer "any family member "what is special about a holiday roast?"The family member would have the tendency to guess assumptively "Ham" "Turkey" "Beef" You say "no" to the family member " This question asks the family member for an opinion, to where the questioner refuses an opinionated answer. "Then you ask them "who or what do you think is special? "The family member says "I believe that children are special"" This is where the "game" relies, and in fact must rely on this answer for the rest of the game to make sense. If for example, the family member says "I think family is special" does this mean that the family eats family members? No, it's just an answer to the question, "who or what do you think is special?" The rest of the game continues on with "You respond "So, you eat children for a Christmas roast?" and relies on the reaction to such a ridiculous question. The game must go in a very specific way otherwise the questioner is then forcing answers to make it go the way the questioner wants it to. The main reason as to why this is not a fact is because there are zero police reports about children being eaten by family members. There are zero news articles anywhere about this "game" or it's claims. There is nothing to prove anything this game claims as true. Links to content created by the author of the game to try prove the game is fact is ridiculous, If I said the grass was blue, not green, then made videos and wiki pages about how I believe it is pink and not green, but never once showing any evidence to grass ever being pink, It would be proven wrong pretty quickly. Just like this game.