population control

I am starting to notice that planning works backwards instead of planning for a problem then fixing it before it becomes an issue. the world waits for one to start and then finds a solution. since this is my first debate and my first time wanting to right something I don't know what I am doing kind of. I am sorry con. I did kinda mean the whole world's population when I was referring to this but since I'm a us citizen I am more concerned about the U.S. But anyway they go both hand and hand if people will not be responsible until it fails people for ever burden humanity with issue after issue that's why I have so many stupid issues because the people before my generation thought they were right and look where its leading. what about smurfs you do know smurfs I never met one . and no it doesn't matter if one civilization believes in the same thing crowded places always have more issue then a uncrowned place. this is fact you can see for your self by driving from a high populated area to a low populated area. most people fear what they do not know and I don't know a lot of people around me. why do people keep posting comments about the U.S. population dwindling I stated the us population now read this: Birth rate: U.S. population: 307,212,123 (July 2009 est.) 14.18 births/1,000 population (2008 est.) Death rate: 8.27 deaths/1,000 population (2008 est so please stop being wrong and admit its growing. world population: 6,790,062,216 (July 2009 est Birth rate: 20.18 births/1,000 population (2008 est.) Death rate: 8.23 deaths/1,000 population (2008 est.) lets see here what else does over populating an area do lets read :) The ecosystem's capacity for humans has been exceeded by a factor of ten, according to the logic of Overshoot by William Catton: the amount of stored energy from the sun (including fossil fuels) humans use is the equivalent of ten earths' intake of usable solar energy for photosynthesis. If one tenth of today's population is what thereby could survive sustainably, that would have to be in a healthy ecosystem. But when the ecosystem has been poisoned, trashed and depletedï¿½e.g., millions of tons of topsoil are lost daily due to modern agricultural practicesï¿½then the survival rate would only be perhaps one tenth of the one tenth! Intrinsic is the role of petroleum, which is going to "be history" early this century. http://www.culturechange.org... I do know the first paragraph off this web page to be true. here's an example what happens if you bring a rabbit to a continent with no predators. First step: rabbits make many rabbits second step: rabbits flourish Third step: the rabbits all starve leaving only a couple left to carry on the rabbit name population control must be in place at one time or another and beside its really not control its being responsible humans. Just because we as a people know a lot, there is balance to everything, until humanity has the means to support more human life people should not make more. but no Mr/ or Mrs person who posted a comment killing everyone is not moral. and its not right to tell people they cant have as many kids as they want, but its way better then one day everyone around u is starving and trying to eat your feet. no wait your kids feet since you prolly wont be alive then, or maybe you will. populatin control must be in place for more reason then just limt of land and over populated areas its a fact if the planet ca't support all of human life it will downsize in a much worse way. (But we can alway rebuild after that) I urge con is wrong