Android is better than Windows OS

It appears that opponent understands little of operating systems and how they work. As this is their first debate, I will allow voters to be more generous with opponent to give them a more fair advantage. The reality is that operating systems do have an influence on the device and its features. Many features that one may assume is exclusive to that particular device is wrong as removing the device's current operating system with another will completely remove those so-called device exclusive features, thus proving that certain features are tied to the OS and not the device. Now, that's not to say that is true for all features - I am merely stating that some features are exclusive to the operating system and not the device. Again, opponent lacks knowledge of OS yet again. When I meant security, I was referring to the security of the OS, not the phone itself. Of course we know that Windows only has a number combination and password system, but that isn't the point of this argument. Security of the OS is meant by how it is able to defend itself against online and network threats such as viruses, malware, trojan, RAT, and so on. We are debating about the operating system of different phones, not the phones themselves. The Windows Market-Place also has many third-party apps that users can download to add extra phone security that Android users already have such as pattern swipe, which makes opponent's argument about phone security invalid. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I never said that I claimed opponent was criticizing Android in a bad way - I meant you were praising it (yes, it's a typo, but anybody could have found that out and disregarded it). As stated before, games and apps alone do not make an operating system superior over the other; rather, it depends on the quality, quantity, security, third-party support, modern concepts, etc., like I stated earlier. Opponent continues to misinterpret and ignore many of my arguments in order to make me look like an idiot to the voters. Opponent still has refused to answer how the apps and games are superior to Windows in terms of quality, security, hardware usage, and third-party support - all of which are key factors (including others) which determine the overall quality of an app or game when being reviewed by professional critics. Opponent uses a vague and bad example to support their argument of how apps are superior on Android over Windows, yet still refuses to discuss the quality, hardware usage, and third-party support (in which I have recommended to opponent to use which I am technically helping them). Opponent states that since apps along with expansion packs, DLC, and updates are released earlier on Android, it must be better than Windows - the same can be said for iOS; since iOS always has apps released earlier than Android, it clearly must be superior over Android right? Wrong! Even a person like you can realize how flawed my analogy is as it changes people to think that one is better than the other simply because of earlier release dates. Where is your evidence to claim that Angry Birds was released in mid-2014 for Windows and Windows OS being limited in South-East Asia? Burden of proof lies within opponent until they can provide a credible and legitimate source that backs up their claims. Again, opponent has no evidence to back up their claims when stating that only Microsoft phones have Windows OS installed in them. It appears that you are wrong, as not only will I explain, but also provide a source at the end of this argument to prove why you are false. As stated earlier, Windows OS is not just on phones and tablets manufactured by Microsoft, it is also available on third party phones and tablets such as Nokia and (shock!) HTC. Again, source will be provided to back up my claims. Both of us can agree that the GUI on Android is more attractive and colorful, but that is too weak and vague of an argument to support your claims. You are wrong when stating that Windows has only one type of display screen as I have stated in the last round that you can customize each GUI to your liking. To be more specific, one can change the colors of the tiles; adjust the size and/or shape of the tiles; and even re-arrange apps in any order with many color and size combinations. Many third-party apps also have their own design which is different from the generic vector-based tiles. And what is so bad about the vector based tile design? It is clearly visually appealing and is inspired by graphics design products such as logos and signs - there are many who praise such an interface design. Though it may still be limited, Microsoft will eventually update the GUI to be as good with Android. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opponent has misinterpreted and avoids many of my arguments as well as failing to use outside sources; I suggest they step up their game if they want to win. As promised, here are legitimate and trustworthy sources to back up any claims that refute your skeptical arguments: http://www.windowsphone.com... https://www.ehow.com... http://www.engadget.com...