Jesus Created Antichrist.

Hello, I shall be promoting the idea that the existence of THE Antichrist is dependent on Jesus' actions, inactions and words. Definitions: Jesus- the Gospel's account of a Jewish carpenter's rise to fame and death, and supposed re-rise. Quoting him endlessly is counterproductive, if you plan on boring the audience with preaching at me instead of debating and interpreting, reading between the lines... That is how you shall put me in my place. Create- (Google) 1.bring (something) into existence. "he created a thirty-acre lake" synonyms:produce, generate, bring into being, make, fabricate, fashion, build, construct; More 2.cause (something) to happen as a result of one's actions. "divorce only created problems for children" synonyms:bring about, give rise to, lead to, result in, cause, breed, generate, engender, produce, make for, promote, foster, sow the seeds of, contribute to "regular socializing creates good team spirit" 3.(of an actor) originate (a role) by playing a character for the first time. I shall be utilizing these three approaches to the term "create". Should you be dissatisfied with the objectivity of these definitions, exercise sound judgment. Turning this into a definition debate will distract and reduce the likelihood of a clear winner. Antichrist: The ultimate bad guy found mainly in the Book of Revelation. An ambitious freak of "supernature", the antithesis of all things Christlike. THE impostor who will deceive the world of his "divinity." Adding to this definition is welcome as long as it is biblically relevant or insightful. The opponent can begin his rebuttal immediately, as I do not see the productivity in wasting rounds for mere formalities of accepting out of arbitrary politeness. Your attitude shall be apparent in future rounds anyway. Argument: The crucifixion implies quite a few ramifications. When God abandoned his Son by looking away and letting sin merge with the sinless one, what would you expect to happen that the Bible fails to elaborate? How else do you end up with the ultimate fraud? Unless you propose that Satan "creates" him; however, within the Christian framework, Satan can only corrupt. Going in that direction, the Antichrist would have to start out with legitimate potential and become tainted along the way. The culpability rests on the blameless one either way; which, by the way, sounds like the plan. For the reason that the window of opportunity of introducing the son of perdition does not allow for many chances except the perfectly unique one aforementioned: when Jesus becomes the man of sin and rejects it. The question remains: what has been the scenario for 2000 years should that be the case? This falls under the first definition of "create". The following is an example of the second, more passive definition. Jesus' inaction over the last 2000 years has left the world in a constantly decaying state of immoral devolution and self-righteous decay. Christians have inadequate direction and leadership. The Antichrist would have a field day with manipulating today's decadent moral landscape, vindicating secular consciences with wicked technicalities. Christians would be disadvantaged by their incompetence and lack of credibility and popularity. Joseph Smith's legacy still stands because Jesus did not have the courtesy of being offended enough to do something about being exploited by a minor antichrist. Jesus introduced the concept of an antichrist, and with narcissism. Who proclaims to have a direct opposite of themselves? Be careful of what you wish for, messiah. Your record is only three short years long, if that. The most extensive sociopathic act of impersonating the messiah is karmic. Jesus came off as an antichrist himself, boasting about his divinity and mission, blaspheming and heresy. Good luck and thank you for humoring me.