Evolution vs Creation

You say the redwood was buried by the flood. If that happened it couldn't live. Just like plants and fish couldn't survive the flood. Plant seeds can't live more then 100 days in water. As for fish the sediment would kill them and the saltwater would kill fresh water fish. Even if the plants did survive, they couldn't grow because the flood would have mixed salt in with the soil. Even if all this happened then most special would go extinct. The population was so low and plants non existent. Even with plants, how could so many kinds live with only 2 or 7 members. The carnivores would die. Creationist say carnivores ate plants but show me an example of a carnivore eating a plant. Even starving carnivores won't eat plants. Let's assume earth did repopulate from 10 people. 2000 years later the earth had 10 million people. For this to happen the birth rate would have to be extremely high with virtually no one dying early deaths. Even crazier is that their where enough people 100 years later to build the tower of babel. The tower reached the heavens and would require a huge amount of people. On chinese civilization, even if the world was 10,000 years old, this civilization would have been destroyed by the flood. Also, at the tower of babel, all people existed around the tower and had one language. We know that there were several civilizations around in this time so it's impossible. As for carbon dating it's been tested in labs for many years. And what about those ice cores dated back 100,000 years. Regarding kinds. You continue to say that creationist don't believe in micro evolution. In his debate with Bill Nye, Ken Ham said, "All these birds had one common ancestor, but their was only one finch ancestor." He also said, "instead of a evolution tree we have a creationist garden branching from several kinds," and "all dogs had one canine ancestor," and he referred to evolution as "molecules-to-man evolution" to distinguish it against creationist micro evolution. So according to him, their were two monkeys making one monkey "kind." Through micro evolution these two monkeys became all the monkey species in only 4000 years. Even less then that because some monkeys had to cross land bridges to get to america. It's impossible for species to evolve that fast. You continue to come up with barely feasible explanations for vesicle organs. Some of these have minor functions but that means they aren't preforming the original function. Like wisdom teeth might be slightly helpful but they don't even develop in some people and almost no food is eaten that far back in the mouth. For apes it's completly neccesary however. Just like body hair keeps your head a little warm, that's because body hair was not neccessary to survive and thus the trait wasn't passed down as much. If god wanted us warm he would have given us a full coat. By the way I didn't even much hair standing up but you talked about it. I was talking about hair in general and why it's only on our head. Our other hair can't warm us. As for why ribs is evidence for evolution it's because apes have 13 pairs but it wasn't helpful for humans so the gene was always passed down.It did get passed down by some people though so the gene still exist in humans, just not the majority of the population. If god intendid us to walk on two legs, he would have given us two toes like horses. Two toes gives the most stable support which is why horses have it. Five toes is very helpful for living in trees so that's why we have them. On the fossil record, if it was by survival you would find that sick animals from a species are on lower levels and very strong ones on higher levels. You would see exceptions to the general trend. The fossil record shows ALL of one species on the same level. Creationist have cited mammals found with dinosaurs, but you will notice these mammals are only found on the dinosaur level. That was just when they lived. We also have many transitional fossils for horses and whales, as well as feathered reptilians with wings and and fish with legs. These show evolution in actions. The platypus is another example, early mammals laid eggs but the platypus is a evolutionary relic from when mammals where a offshoot of reptiles. As for genesis being allegorical, it says night and day and light and darkness where created before the sun and moon and stars. The ancients knew that the sun was a light source so they wouldn't create a myth like this to be taken literally because if you do so it makes no logical sense.