Abortion

"for one for something to develop and change it has to be Living, Brain function doesn't matter." Biologically living, yes. Same as sperm cells and unfertilised eggs. Are you stating that sperm cells and unfertilised eggs are people, and that male masturbation and the natural human menstrual cycle are 'murder'? Your second point is simply not correct. Brain function is literally how 'human life' is defined in legal and medical terms. This has already been stated, addressed and sourced. If you take issue with said source specifically point it out and provide your own legitimate, valid, scientific source stating that brain function is actually irrelevant to human life. As it stands, causing the brain death of a person is the same thing as killing that person. Brain death is synonymous with actual death in legal and medical terms. You are wrong. "also when I said convenience I didn't mean if it would kill the I just mean that if they say* oh I'm just not ready for the baby I wanna have a party life first* bit thats just irresponsible to do that." Unsubstantiated personal opinion. Demonstrate how deliberately choosing to bring a life into the world that you are simply not prepared or able to care for is somehow a 'responsible' choice to make just because you say it is. Also, implication that all reasons for not having an abortion equate to 'I only care about me, I want to have a good time' are not only insulting, they're wrong. I have already stated this. Address the actual points I am making, not a caricature thereof. Also, as stated, literally every single pregnancy involves a very real, statistically significant threat of death. This is relevant in every single instance of abortion ever. You cannot get around this just by ignoring it. "and condoms are not that expensive so the idea of people not having access to contraceptives is BS." For example, many countries are not first world countries and there does not exist easy access to birth control in those nations. This is not an argument exclusive to the 21st century US. Even if it were, in many states birth control access is restrictive, such as minors (who, believe it or not, do actually tend toward having sex later in their teenage years whether or not they're 'allowed' to) not being allowed to buy contraceptives, which simply leads to them having sex without them. Again, you cannot get around this argument by simply ignoring it. "I say if you don't want a baby, don't have sex without a condom, and if you can't get condoms, don't have sex unless you are ready to risk becoming pregnant and thus giving a child the right to live." Already been addressed. This is not only just your personal opinion, it is simply punishing women for having sex, deliberately and explicitly harmful to those women when actually given legal weight, and ignorantly and arrogantly equating 'consent to sex' with 'consent to become pregnant and have a child', despite the given arguments against this being the case (and despite that you make the same arguments even when specific mitigating factors are involved, ie. birth control, use of which specifically demonstrates lack of intent & consent to become pregnant). This argument has already been addressed, and you have not adequately responded or introduced any new points, so this argument is simply extended as-is. "the fetus is still developing, and as stated before, growth, development, these all require one simple thing, LIFE. and if it is alive and has HUMAN DNA and is developing which requires life, it is Human." This has already been addressed. Please respond to the actual points I am making. Do not parrot previous arguments you have already given and which have already been addressed. "to have an abortion for selfish irresponsible reasons such as wanting a party life first should be wrong, there should be a Health Reason first, not just cause you don't want a baby." All abortions involve explicit 'health reasons', as every pregnancy is potentially life-threatening. It has already been pointed out that implying that women only go out and get abortions because '[they] want[ing] a party life first' is not only insulting, and flatly wrong, it's also an unsubstantiated straw-man. "if you become pregnant due to irresponsible actions such as Unprotected sex, you should have to take responsibility for your actions( that doesn't include killing an innocent life) as abortions are just punishing another life for your irresponsible actions, if you know you don't want a baby use protection" Again, this is simply punishing women for having sex, it has nothing whatsoever to do with 'protecting innocent life'. All of those points have already been addressed; actually respond to the actual points I am actually making. Specific comments aside, all arguments extended.