The Christian god exists and rules over the universe - read rules.

Thank you for your defence. Your defence barely touched upon any of my refutes and gave either pointlessly short attempts at a defence or irrelevant information. You only spoke about your ‘evidences’ having to do with my criteria, but seemed to ignore the 786 words that actually answer the majority of your ‘concerns’. On top of this, the actual ‘defences’ you supplied you use an example of 1 of 12 of your predictions to try and attack the criteria, I am not saying that all your ‘evidences’ violate all the criteria, but they all violate at least one, and the violation of one of these criteria’s is enough to dismantle the ‘prophecy’. My original refute bolded Your defence underlined My new comment is in standard font 1.It must be accurate. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it is not accurate, because knowledge (and thus foreknowledge) excludes inaccurate statements. Show us the inaccuracies. You need to read my arguments!!! I have an individual refute to each of the ‘prophecies’. I am not saying that all your ‘evidences’ violate all the criteria, but they all violate at least one, and the violation of one of these criteria’s is enough to dismantle the ‘prophecy’. 2.It must be in the Bible. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it is not in the Bible, because Biblical foreknowledge definitionally can only come from the Bible itself. It is in the Bible. You included multiple ‘prophecies’, all yours were in the bible but I still included this criteria as it is a part of the criteria. 3.It must be unambiguous. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if multiple outcomes could fulfill the foreknowledge, because ambiguity prevents one from knowing whether the foreknowledge was intentional or not. It is. Gospel preached throughout the world, great prophet comes and renounces Christ, sets up a graven image that is bowed to, sets up something at the Temple Mount declaring it God, death to those who reject it, it's a group that beheads Christians, Ishmael's seed will not be God's children (Islam's father is Ishmael ), they make up 1/4 of Earth, they are represented by the sword, their belief is hellbent on conquest. You need to read my arguments!!! I have an individual refute to each of the ‘prophecies’, I know for a fact that I addressed this ¼ thing, I have also addressed other ‘prophecies’ that violate this criteria (which includes everything you have used in your defence), BUT YOU HAVE NOT RESPONDED TO THEM!!! I am not saying that all your ‘evidences’ violate all the criteria, but they all violate at least one, and the violation of one of these criteria’s is enough to dismantle the ‘prophecy’. 4.It must be improbable. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it reasonably could be the result of a pure guess, because foreknowledge requires a person to actually know something true, while a correct guess doesn't mean that the guesser knows anything. This also excludes contemporary beliefs that happened be true but were believed to be true without solid evidence. That's about as improbable as it gets. What is as improbable as it gets? You have 12 ‘prophecies’ or are you referring to this criteria is improbable??? Maybe more than 7 words would be useful in the future! 5.It must have been unknown. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it reasonably could be the result of an educated guess based off contemporary knowledge, because foreknowledge requires a person to know a statement when it would have been impossible, outside of supernatural power, for that person to know it. No one could have known Islam would appear around 700 AD fulfilling the book of Revelation in every way imaginable. You need to read my arguments!!! I have an individual refute to each of the ‘prophecies’ that you have ignored. I addressed this ‘prophecy’ already! You cannot defend with a claim that I have refuted and you have not defended!!! I am not saying that all your ‘evidences’ violate all the criteria, but they all violate at least one, and the violation of one of these criteria’s is enough to dismantle the ‘prophecy’. Responding to “Islam 101”. Another prophecy for me to DIRECTLY RESPOND TO, perhaps you will read this one. 1 of 13 is doable! You claim that Allah dislikes the name ‘the king of kings’ and that is what Jesus is was named. I will give you 2 different refutes for that. 1. King of kings = god, all holy books disallow the worship of another god, so is it too much of a surprise that it disallows someone being called king of kings? 2. The Quran came after Christianity, perhaps this was a direct reference to Christianity so that Islamic followers are against Christianity. It is no argument for a ‘prophecy’. What are you even saying in "The beast of the Earth", is this an attempt at another ‘prophecy’? Is it a threat? What are you saying? So what that both the Quran and the bible both say that those who do not believe will be in ‘trouble’ during the rapture that people have been waiting for like 2000 years? Religion is almost always been based on fear (purpose of revelations, heaven and hell etc.), is it a surprise that these 2 religions follow this tradition as well, perhaps the Quran copied this from the bible as Christianity was ‘getting numbers’. If you want to read the direct refutes that you did not defend, read from “Now to your direct "evidences".” to “Further on this, Babylon was not by the red sea " if that is even what you are saying?!?!”.