BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
People with Asperger's, schizoprenia or bi-polar should all be institutionalized

Thank you for your last argument! It's been such a pleasure to be discussing this with you, and I'm excited to hear what the voters have to say. Good luck! You repeated a lot of your same points over again, but you didn't really add much to your previous arguments, which I have already explained as invalid. To begin with, you said that 'my whole point of this debate was for prevention of future crimes'. So was mine. The question is how to do this. You agreed with me that we were talking about a small amount of violent mentally ill people, but you argued that this percentage is inaccurate because these crimes are not often reported. However, you gave no basis or source for this theory. You make a claim that our understanding of mental illness and violence has been compromised, and yet you give no evidence to support this claim. I have offered sources and explained why I believe that mental illness is not highly connected to violence. But instead of providing evidence to the contrary, you just denied it and restated your main point. It's true that 50% of our population suffers from mental illness- but only about five percent of the total population even commits major crimes [1]. The amount of mentally ill people doesn't prove anything. Ultimately, there is clear evidence that criminal psychologists will help lower crime rates [2]. Some people will still commit a crime- this is unavoidable, but hundreds of lives have also been affected by psychologists in a positive way [3] [4] [5]. You are right that because they cannot function in the way that other people can, mentally ill people have a hard time finding a good use in society. But you are absolutely wrong that these people are 'useless', and don't contribute to society other than 'licking glass and drooling'. My uncle has fragile X, and I have several friends with down syndrome, and I know from experience that this isn't true. Just because they have a hard time functioning does not make them useless. There is so much that mentally ill people have to share with the world [6] [7]. Just because they cannot function in the same way that other people can do not make them useless. I have worked with multiple institutions that allow mentally ill people to work and contribute to society [8] [9]. [1] http://www.politifact.com... [2] http://sites.psu.edu... [3] https://counseling.online.wfu.edu... [4] http://www.educationworld.com... [5] https://onlinedegrees.bradley.edu... [6] https://themighty.com... [7] https://www.rd.com... [8] http://www.burntmountaincenter.com... [9] http://morningstarcfs.org...
People with Asperger's, schizoprenia or bi-polar should all be institutionalized

I have an hour left to post my final argument so I have to make this quick My whole point of this debate was for prevention of future crimes. By locking up the mentally ill we will eliminate psychopaths from running around and hurting people. I know we are talking about a small amount of violent mentally ill people, but that is because most smaller crimes are not always reported or the perpetrator is given probation or community service because the courts don't want to incarcerate an ill person as that might destabilize them more and make them become more irritated, combative or angry at the system. But the problem is bigger then a few of the extreme cases we hear about in the news. 50% of our population suffers from some type of mental illness. I don't think hiring more shrinks will solve this problem, we have enough psychiatrist now and the killing and violence from the mentally ill people still happens. In fact the sandy Hook killer was seeing a shrink, so was the Columbine killers as well as others yet they still committed crimes, The Isla Vista killer was supposed to be at his counselling session yet he was out killing people instead. Hard lines need to be taken, I don't want to talk about if after it has happened, like how did this happen? Why didn't we stop this earlier, where was the Police (the police only work on the premonition that a crime has already happened, they can't prevent every psycho from attacking people or snapping or checking if they took their meds. So I say put them all in an insane asylum. Now you argued that only a small amount of mentally ill are violent, ok but what about the rest of the mentally ill, they live off of disability because they can't function in a fast paced working world, so they are just moochers of the system which hard working people have to pay for in their taxes. These mentally ill people are useless in society, they don't contribute other then licking glass and drooling. The only people that benefit from these freaks of nature is the pharmaceutical companies, so maybe we should lock them up in cages in labs and the pharmaceutical companies can run experiments on them, kind of like test labs for humans. A mentally ill person need to have their hand held as they can't function on their own like people with autism, Asperger's or schizophrenia so they are just a burden on society as someone has to be to take care of them, they can't support themselves, in nature they would just die off but in our bleeding heart society we feel the need to keep these vegetables alive I don't know for what reason. If you have assburgers, wear a rubber helmet or drool uncontrollably you should be locked up, you can't function in normal society and you are just a deformed human specimen. It's like on the assembly line for products, if a label is crooked, the products is not whole or missing parts it is pulled of the belt and discarded. Well the mentally ill should be discarded as a unsatisfactory human specimen's with a brain defect. FAIL, in the trash/asylum
People with Asperger's, schizoprenia or bi-polar should all be institutionalized

I accept! I'm going to be very busy the next couple of days, but I'll do everything I can to get my arguments down before my time runs out. My opponent has taken up the burden of arguing that people with mental illnesses deserve to be locked up. He gave several Wikipedia links about mass murderers and serial killers who had mental disorders (although actually, one of them didn't mention mental disorders at all), as well as a link that connects mass murder and brain injuries. It's true that people with mental disabilities will be more mentally unstable, and for a few people, these will lead to violence. But only about 3-5% of gun violence can be tied to mental disorders. [1] Most people with mental disorders are rarely violent, and we can't judge everyone by the small percentage of people that are. To put everyone in jail simply because of this small percentage would be inhuman and cruel. Much of the American judicial system is based on the belief that, as William Blackstone said, "It is far better than ten guilty people go free than one innocent man is convicted." [2] I do understand, however, that mentally unstable people will be more prone to violence, and I don't deny that fact. When people's minds aren't fully functional in the way that ours are, they can do things that someone in their right mind wouldn't do, including violence. However, I do not believe that locking them up should ever be an answer to that. There are so many beautiful people in the world with unique personalities and a beautiful way of seeing the world that also have a mental illness. My uncle is one of them, and he wouldn't hurt a fly. Mental illness CAN be treated. It can never be completely cured, but there are ways to prevent it from affecting a person and grounding them further in real life. [3] Putting mentally ill people in prison would be to deprive them of a future. It would show them that they are invaluable and worthless just because of their disability. But they are not. [4] They are still people, and they still have emotions and desires and plans for a future, just like any of us. To deprive them of that simply because of something that they were born with is absurd. [5] [1] http://www.amhca.org... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org... [3] http://www.mentalhealthamerica.net... [4] https://lifehacker.com... [5] https://www.usatoday.com...
People with Asperger's, schizoprenia or bi-polar should all be institutionalized

People who have assburgers, schizophrenia or bi-polar disorder should all be institutionalized in rubber rooms and straight jackets to prevent them from harming innocent people. How many times do we need to see some wack job mentally ill person get hold of a gun, or drive a car into a crowd, or just randomly kill people because they have mental illness. Enough with the excuses of mental illness, you have it, you should be in a rubber room locked up. These people are crazy and I would personally have them all turned into animal feed through a wood chipper, but I will settle on a rubber room for these degenerate retards. https://en.wikipedia.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... https://www.washingtonpost.com... https://en.wikipedia.org...
Money can buy everything

I definitely understand how money could be seen as the key to happiness. Money can definitely help you get plenty of things. People who can't afford to do certain things might never have the chance to change their lives, therefore losing a chance at happiness. It can take you places like college, other countries, and to new experiences. You might even find friends and someone who cares about you, someone you wouldn't have met in any other circumstance. Money is important. Without money you can't afford things that would make you happy. I'm quite sure I've met more poor and sad people than rich and sad people.
Money can buy everything

Since this is the last round I'll just try and make it short. The reason why I'm copying and pasting, is that to support my arguments and also my side. I will need all the sources I can get to win this debate; there are also the opinions of others that need to be heard regarding this topic. I am not just copying and pasting, I am also giving credit to the site that I've just copied and pasted so that when people view our debate they will see that what I'm saying is true, and I just didn't make that up in my mind. It is not against the rules to get sources from websites that you think can help you support your arguments and side of which you are participating in. Then again, I've learned so much in this debate I hope you can invite me to other debates. This has helped me so much in my English, Thanks again for a wonderful and exciting debate.
Money can buy everything

I've never claimed that rich people don't get depressed, just like the middle classes. And like you mentioned, there's no evidence that money actually makes you unhappy. And if anything, it can give you more ways to fix your problems. People with money, if anything, should have some more ambition. Having money gives you more opportunities, and gives your children opportunities. A father or mother who has built up money for their children should be wise with that money. People are very critical, period. It doesn't matter if you're rich or poor, people are going to find a way to judge you. I wouldn't know much of what it's like for rich people in the UK, mainly because I'm not rich, or been to the UK. Some people will find something negative or degrading to say about you anyways. Not nice, but it happens. That, once again, is a general thing. There will always be someone smarter, more athletic, or more artistic than you. It's something you'll have to deal with. And yes, I am aware that rich people are human. Money can"t buy the love of your friends and family. I'm aware of that. But you should probably already have that. Your family is the one thing you should always be able to count on. And if they have those kinds of problems, yes, you should help them. But there should be a line. There are countless stories of people who drain their parents and relatives of money, instead of finding their own jobs. Instead of pulling out the checkbook every time someone needs something, find ways to help them make money of their own. Call in some favors with people you know need employees. If their child needs help, find a way to split the costs, and make the therapist or counselor affordable. If they're elderly, that's something that shouldn't matter. You should take care of them. Who's to say you need to buy all of those houses? If there is one thing all people need, it's an anchor. Someone who will bring them back to earth every time they start thinking of buying an island, or taking on another project when they've got three already. There are all types of cons. There are those who trick you into giving your information over the Internet, and the ones who trick elderly out of their retirement. Everyone should beware of scams and frauds, not just rich people. That's what everyone is worried about. Does he care for me, or does he just want to get into my pants? Does she like being with me, or does she just like the attention? As disheartening as it is, people can never be sure of whether or not they're really loved by the people they're dating. And last, but not least, could you use your own arguments. I'd appreciate it if you came up with your own opinions like I'm trying to do, instead of copying and pasting everything.
Money can buy everything

Money doesn"t make you happy After a surprisingly low point, more money doesn"t make you happier. Rich people get depressed, just like the middle classes. True, there"s no evidence that money actually makes you unhappy (although one rich man is giving it all away) but it could distract you from fixing your real problems. The end of your goals and ambitions You see this with children born into money, as well as people who built a company up for several decades and sold too late to start another. When you have the money, what next? The trick seems to be to find a substitute to your old goal of achieving financial security. That"s why you can"t walk far in Africa without tripping over a philanthropist. Being judged unfairly People are very critical of the wealthy, especially here in the UK. In the US entrepreneurs are celebrated, but newly rich Brits will find many people waiting for them to fall. I've seen it in work " a self-made man or woman leaves the room, and someone says "well, he was lucky" or "he"s out of ideas" or even "what an a**hole". Not nice, but it happens. Someone is richer than you Rich people are human, too. Your yacht isn't as big as the one next door, or you had to buy your furniture, unlike your neighbors who had theirs passed down from the 17th Century. Nobody is the richest person in the world on every measure " how many billions would Buffet give to be young again? Guilt Money can"t buy the love of your friends and family. "Don"t feel bad about being rich," they say. But do you believe them? One has a broken boiler, another has a child with special needs, and then there are distant relatives who can"t afford nursing care. Do you help them all? Can you? Where do you draw the line? Being rich is a big deal Buy a country house and you need staff. Invest your millions and you need accountants. They move your money offshore, and now you don"t understand the taxes. You've no time to learn, because you've three different architects coming over to quote on your summer home. You think you"d be different? So do I. Didn't they? Scams and fraudsters One reason you"ll need to all those professionals is because you"ll need help warding off the crooks attracted to your wealth. Nobody wanted to pretend to be you when you owed the bank money, but now you've millions parked away it"s a different story. Let"s hope your financial advisers aren't swindlers, too. I love you (and your money) The big one. Does she really find you fascinating, or just your bank balance? Is he really won over by your beauty, wit, or experience, or does he just hope to bleed you dry while banging the French au pair? Reference: http://monevator.com...
Money can buy everything

And how exactly do you know what situation I'm in? You've never met me, you don't know who I am, and for all you know, I'm might be from out of the U.S., or 57 years old. And I'm not saying you can't be poor and optimistic. The Lord loves everyone in the world, regardless of their economic status. I like making people smile. That's something I can concede to you. But money can make people smile. It provides opportunity and a chance to prosper. The thought of having your kids grow up with very few problems is enough to make a lot of people smile. And very few problems equals having money to keep those problems away. Would you please stay with the subject? I don't appreciate personal comments, and this debate has nothing personally to do with me. I'd rather this stayed professional.
Money can buy everything

I guess you didn't pay attention to my last argument, which makes you not focusing on our debate. All I have to say is that you hadn't been in that situation for you not to experience it, if you observe the people who are living in the poor society or maybe living in a poor country, you will notice that even though some of them have already give up in life, some of them are actually being optimist and living their life to the fullest with the help of the lord. All you see is the outside of the box, but if you enter that box and open your heart, you will understand how hard it is to live in a place where food and water is limited; but still, even in that situation, they still have the reason to smile; isn't there any reason to smile? when you smile do you pay someone? smile is a powerful gesture, with just a smile you can make an angry person forget all his/her sorrow and problems, and the great news is that it is free. Smile is one thing that money can't buy, just remember that don't always make an excuse for something that is worth to live for.
Money can buy everything

Just out of curiosity, how exactly do you know that people were happy without money? If anything, I'd imagine they wouldn't be. If there wasn't money, they'd have to trade things that they have, which would make their objects a currency. People have always wanted to trade one thing for another, and probably always will. Money can also give you time to spend with your loved ones. Why does everyone think that being rich makes you miserable? It doesn't matter if you're rich or poor, you can still have people you love with you. Being rich means more time to spend with your loved ones, and more ways to enjoy your time with them.
Money can buy everything

I will start my argument with a quote --Quote-- "Money can buy a house but not home Money can buy a bed but not sleep Money can buy a book but not knowledge Money can buy a clock but not time Money can buy medicine but not health Money can buy position but not respect Money can buy blood but not life Money can buy sex but not love Money can buy insurance but not safety Money can buy food but not appetite" Reference for quote: http://jacobkuttyta.hubpages.com... --Argument-- This world has begun without the help of money; thousands of years ago where technology hasn't yet been discovered, where Twinkies(delicious!) has not yet been made, where Elvis Presley has not been born, and where nuclear power has not created. People back then are so happy, not like today. People back then are so happy even without electricity, technology and music artist (though they are so lucky back then because they wouldn't hear the crap that artist make today). Even without money, happiness and love are two of the most wonderful things that a person can feel; If you help someone would it require for them to pay you? The answer is-- that the amount of happiness you feel when you help someone is not really measurable and cannot be express by words; plus the amount of love and happiness you feel when you are with the one you love is not also measurable and also can't be express by words but only actions, and cannot be bought by money but can only be gain by trust and affection.
Predators is the best sequel film in the Predator franchise so far

As I said in the first stage "Please bare in mind that this debate is about if the film is the best for people to enjoy overall" I will now prove that Predators is the most enjoyable sequel to the original Predator and best for audiences and people in general to see. Rotten Tomatoes is a website devoted to reviews, information, and news of films, most widely known as a film review aggregator. Its name derives from the clichï¿½ of audiences throwing tomatoes and other vegetables at a poor stage performance. If a film scores more than 60% then it gets a fresh rating and is classed as a "Good" film. If a film gets less than 60% then it gets a rotten rating and is classed as "Bad". The critics who normally give the reviews for the films are mainly people from the public in general (the best of course). Now let's see what reviews the critics gave to all 4 Predator sequels: Predator 2: http://www.rottentomatoes.com... 23% gave it a positive review Alien vs. Predator: http://www.rottentomatoes.com... 22% gave it a positive review Alien vs. predator: Requiem: http://www.rottentomatoes.com... 12% gave it a positive review Predators: http://www.rottentomatoes.com... 63% gave it a positive review So it's clear that Predators is the most enjoyable sequel to the original film and is the only sequel to get a Fresh review. If you haven't seen any of the Predator films (or only just the original Predator film) then see the original Predator first and then see Predators because it is the best and true sequel to the original film.