Obama will not be our next President

I feel so bad, I can't believe this happened. I guess I will have to concede. I will now con....... . Just kidding. I do feel bad though. So far my opponent has been arguing about words and what they mean. Hey by the way, thank you so much for correcting my grammar and spelling. I'm sure I could not have made it through this debate with out it, I hope all the people that read this argument will vote one point for Britt. Now let me get down to the point so you do not waste your last opportunity to at least argue for your position, so far all you have done is argue for my stance in this debate. You have focused a lot of attention on the word *will*. You say that because I said "Obama *will* not be our next President" that I have to prove that and I can not because the election is in the future. If the definition or meaning of the word *will* that I used in that sentence was in fact the definition or meaning that I was implying when I made the debate then you would be right. Let me run a few things by you before give you some reference. It *will* rain tomorrow. I *will* see you tomorrow. Now can I prove either of these until tomorrow? I can not, but you are forgetting the complexity of the English Language. Now pay close attention. Modal verb A verb that, when used with other verbs, expresses such things as certainty, possibility, wishes, or intentions. The main modal verbs are: ma/might; will/would; can/could; shall/should; must. *Will* is a model verb. Prediction - Will and Shall Will and shall can be used to predict that an event or an action will take place or will occur. The model verbs can be used to make a prediction about an event or action about the future. Will: Expresses future plans or predictions Examples: She will graduate this year. He will not attend the concert. Alright, that is enough. All these examples were taken form English Language learning web sites. You can look them up for yourself. I said "Obama will not be our next President", because *will* is a model verb use to predict. So when I say "Obama will not be our next President" I was simply making a prediction. And a prediction does not have to be proved until the time of the action that is predicted. A prediction can be argued or debated about but does not have to be proved. Now I hope you can swallow your pride and go ahead and start giving some arguments against by prediction. If you continue to go on and on about the word *will* I'm afraid you might not like the results. Now I will go into your arguments for my side. 1. Ignorance: Under this category falls those voters who are white (or other) and will not vote for Obama because he is black (mulatto, actually), blacks who will not vote for him because he isn't "black enough," women and men who will not vote for him because Hillary isn't on the ticket, women who will vote for McCain *just* because he has a female on the ticket. Yes, thank you for agreeing for my comments on Racism. This is just one of the reason Obama will not be our next President. My little model was just a demonstration of the ignorance that not only effects the people I work with but also the millions of Democrats across the nation. 2. "Legalism": There are already thousands of lawyers working for both campaigns, and it seems inevitable with the closeness of the race and how much is at stake, historically and politically, that they will swoop in and take over, much like 2000. Correct again! There are lawyers working to ensure the election, just as they did in 2000. We are not debating ethics or morals in this debate. 3. Karl Rove: He works with the McCain campaign (all while being an objective consultant on Fox News), and no Democrat can compete with him, either strategically or tactically. His "style" will end up dragging both candidates through the mud and destroy whatever confidence anyone has left in the American political process. Absolutely right again! You do understand this debate is not about the Republicans playing fair or not, this debate is about "Obama will not be our next President". But, in the end you are right. The Republicans have an army of strategists that are working on ways to ensure the Presidency for McCain. Right or wrong this is yet another reason why Obama will not be our next President. Just look at the swift boat deal, slaughtered the Kerry campaign. And it was not even "Bush" who put it out, classic politics. And now on to the last argument. My opponent said "and those that will not vote for him because they would rather have a beer and a barbecue with McCain, or rather have McCain change their car tire when they get a flat" You are again totally with me on this one. You may think that guys like me are knuckle dragging, beer swigging, country music listening hillbilly's. And you are correct. That is me in a nutshell. Even if you do not like it this is the makeup of the glorious country that we live in, GOD BLESS AMERICA! We like a guy who we know we could go to his house, crack open a cold beer and watch the Super Bowl and feel completely at home. Guys like Obama look like a glass of stale water to guys like me. Shoot, Hillary is more of a man's man's then Obama. This is not meant to be a slander against Obama, just a honest observation. "On the other hand the Republican Party is extraordinarily One house." -Really? One house of what, exactly? Conservatives? I think not Well, I did not say conservatives I said Republicans. Please do not twist my words like this, gentlemen do not behave in this manner. "Division-The Democratic Party has developed deep division in this once honorable Party..." -An *almost* correct statement. Any division today is because of Obama' s not choosing Hillary Clinton as his running mate. That is not the only division, I believe you know this though. The Democratic began as a party for the working man. And this was the only point in time this once great party was a united party. But after Homosexuals, Pro-Choice, Socialist (welfare) and Communism began to infest the Party it went down hill fast. And statements like this do not help Obama at all. Barack Obama "Pennsylvania rural citizens "cling" to their religion and guns out of embittered economic desperation". Obama lost his lead in the polls when a women was added to the Republican ticket. Let me guess, this has nothing to do with it. The goal of the Republican campaign is to elect there nominee. A woman as VP was a wise choice because of the boost in the polls. Now I urge you to start giving some kind of argument for you to be the negative in this debate. Something would be good at this point. I started this debate to see what Obama could possibly have on his side. Please do not forget you already agreed for me, at this point in the debate it would be wise to stop wasting time with word plays and going over the arguments I have already stated. This has been a great debate and I have enjoyed it. I only wish you could have done more to debate me on issues other than a word. I know you wanted to kill this debate quickly but I believe this tactic has backfired. I urge you to drop the smug attitude and try to concentrate your arguments on why Obama will be our next President. You have already made my points for me in this debate, if you start now you can give some arguments for your stance. Obama will not be our next President. I know this statement probably enrages you and other Democrats. I do not think it has this effect on you because I am lying, you have already agreed me on y stance. I feel it makes you and to the point of sweating palms and racing heart beat because you know Obama will not be our next President too. Stop and look the issues from a realistic standpoint and you may be able to drop the naive stance and come over to the right side.