BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The Tyranids from Warhammer best the Zerg from StarCraft in any sense

Counter-Counter-Adaptation: This is one ground where the Zerg and Tyranid are equal. Both of them can actively change themselves to match any foe. It would essentially be a situation where both would evolve and counter-evolve so many times that neither side could win on that alone. Counter-Counter-Communication: I want to point out that queens would run interference prior to connection. Both sides would be capable of destroying each others psionic capabilities, but the Zerg would ultimately win out. The Zerg have access to cerebrates, which, I have noted are essentially immortal. These cerebrates are devoted to psychic capabilities. This implies that they are far stronger than whatever half combat, half amplifier that the Tyranid employ. Keep in mind, the Zerg are the ones being attacked here. Kerrigan: Kerrigan has defeated the fallen Xel'Naga Amon. In Starcraft, this is basically the assassination of a god. She defeated him in his homeland, a place where nobody should've been able to go. Counter-Counter-Side-Note: This "Shadow in the Warp" phenomenon is irrelevant. The Tyranid aren't cut off from their hive mind. Why should the Zerg? Counter-Counter-Primal-Zerg: It is worth noting that the Primal Zerg have no connection to the actual Zerg hive mind. They merely follow it because it's really powerful. Psionic Disruptors: The Zerg have had psionic disruptors employed against them in the past. Due to the Primal Zerg, they were able to defeat it. Because of this, the Zerg have acquired many of these devices. It is hardly inconceivable that they be used by the Zerg in tandem with the Primal Zerg to deal with whatever threat is present. Counter-Creep: I am merely pointing out that the first stage in Tyranid take over would be effectively nullified. The instantaneous reaction from the Zerg would actually help them with studying the new invader.
Rap Battle (TV's tourney)

C :Congratz on conguring that cackle you call a rhyme it's kinder level compared to me who's taking college courses nice try with the fortune and fame but I'm the one with the cabaret you're a cabin boy the caboose of every joke. Your callosity is too much even golems wouldn't care to careen inside your womb it'd be cataclysmic they would catapult out of that cave like tha calavry charging toward the enemyYou're a cheerleader probably already written a few verses nothing new nothin original yore a chigger not the chupacabra tiny and irritating you're clamorous not lyrical or genius You're cherries been popped with that fake shotgun of yours you've cocked it too much no your cherries coarseIt's not coincidental that we battled maybe you learned a thing or two here I'm the emperor not a lowly king you're condemned to failure it was inevitableThis ending was conceivable you're compulsive the conclusion to this story confines you to conditional conformity you've been confuted this ending will be consecutive nice try but I have to say contend with those in your proper grade
Rap Battle (TV's tourney)

It's not like I actually read your rhyme After all it would just be a waste of time Oh well, I'll get around to it later But honestly, you're nicer than Ralph Nader OK really, I don't understand You should've forfeited, 'cuz I'm the man Haha, you wrote that in 60 plus hours? And yet in 40 minutes, I show you true power Oh, goddamit I just lost the game Meh, at least I have fortune and fame Oh that's a nice ho, suck my cock It's ten inches long and hard as rock It's a good thing I didn't waste my best rap But I'm busy having sex while con goes *fap fap* I won't even bother finishing this verse Because honestly, I love to be terse. But why stop here, why so soon? I still have alot of things to lampoon! That's okay though, I've already won Now go and give up before I get out my shotgun.
Rap Battle (TV's tourney)

Motha fvcker please calling yourself an MC you're a W-H-O-R-E. What's your glitch little b1tch I'll never be caught dead singing "libretto" Your rhymes are whack "gonna tortured on the rack"? take a verb lesson from your better twin george bush Plastic and blow up dolls don't count as chicks you dumb sh1t Its not nice to talk about you're mom as apart of my extremities I'll have her doin the brokencowboy while she screams Talkin bout cars with bling b1tch don't make me laugh the hot wheels you collect are just shiny toys Don't get confused don't bust a lobe I know my rhymes are tough to grasp just hang in there you've got one more chance. Hey it's okay putting subtexts in your "rhymes we all can see you're a closeted gay who like to grab and wants to sing. The king? the lord? the master? stop your inappropriate virulence you're preposterous you're confused you can't decide if you're a transvestite or a hermaphrodite be quick take pick either way you probably don't have a d1ck. You haven't heard yet what I'm shoutin take a step back sit down let the sound in sayin I sound like your grandma and am as nice as your granpa hell you must suck at rappin and being a homosapien. Vanilla Ice just called he want his little fame back go back to background where you belong you just lost this game please try again some other time. sidenote: so I haven't done this in awhile and am rusty but please evaluate us both the same
Rap Battle (TV's tourney)

This is MC Brain from back in the ghetto I'm bringing the pain as you sing libretto While I drink beer and smoke crack You gonna tortured on the rack I have like a hundred hot chicks And Con, he has but a hand and a dick I drive around with a car of bling I'll crush your balls and make ya sing Hey kid? You challenge the King MC? I'm your lord and master so I hereby decree You're just another one-time wonder I'll kill you and yo homies quicker than thunder You have no talent you use the internet To find rhymes, and that's certain You better listen to the rap I'm spouting Before all the gods of rhymes start bowing I drive around in a Ferrari Now bow and say you're sorry Kid you rhyme like my grandma And then you show the niceness of my grandpa I hope Con just heard what I'm saying Atheist or not he better be praying This is MC Brain from back down the street Con's just a nice guy, sickeningly discreet.
Jokes Battle

Rules: 5 Rounds 1 week voting period 2 days of arguying. In this case it is only jokes 8000 characters Max 3 Jokes per round Let the game begin !!! 1. A couple of New Jersey hunters are out in the woods when one of them falls to the ground. He doesn't seem to be breathing, his eyes are rolled back in his head. The other guy whips out his cell phone and calls the emergency services. He gasps to the operator: "My friend is dead! What can I do?" The operator, in a calm soothing voice says: "Just take it easy. I can help. First, let's make sure he's dead." There is a silence, then a shot is heard. The guy's voice comes back on the line. He says: "OK, now what?" 2. A woman gets on a bus with her baby. The bus driver says: "That's the ugliest baby that I've ever seen. Ugh!" The woman goes to the rear of the bus and sits down, fuming. She says to a man next to her: "The driver just insulted me!" The man says: "You go right up there and tell him off " go ahead, I'll hold your monkey for you." 3. A doctor says to his patient, "I have bad news and worse news". "Oh dear, what's the bad news?" asks the patient. The doctor replies, "You only have 24 hours to live." "That's terrible", said the patient. "How can the news possibly be worse?" The doctor replies, "I've been trying to contact you since yesterday."
No god would use text as a form of communication

Awe gosh golly gee gosh darned it all, unlike the miserable cow dung larvae that you are, I can prove EVERYTHING I state whereas you can prove nothing. That's why you tried to invert the conversation to tip it towards you and you being the He-Man that you think you are, are but only She-Ra wiping his reareth endeth with battery acid and a fire ants nest. Oh you are the power all right. Bye.
No god would use text as a form of communication

No. Sorry deareth lung rot. You stick to the debate parameters, in which you cannot and you know it, otherwise bow out and leave like the miserable sour milk scab that you are as you tried and interrupt this debate. Its my debate, its not yours. Oh and btw, to add further insult to YOUR injury, there’s no proof for ANY god(s) ever existing. Golly gosh gee golly gosh darned it all.
Random Debate part 2

I will address my opponent's three arguments below. The first day of school, who can better describe it? My opponent argues that because there are times when the teacher may not be looking a small child's account of what happened is better. However we must look at a few instances where this would certainly not be the case. He also argues that the teacher does not know what the child's personal feelings are. My opponent seems not to have read the entirety of our last debate as I already explained that we were not debating about who can best explain personal feelings but who can best describe objective actions and scenarios that occur in one's life. Ex. The first day of pre-school. My opponent also seems to think that children are left completely alone during lunchtime or recess which of course is not the case. Onlookers cannot know how schizophrenics feel. I will explain this again. We are debating on who can best describe objective situations and scenarios that present themselves in a person's life. Personal feelings about these situations are not the main focus of this debate. My opponent never argued successfully why a schizophrenic is better able to objectively describe their life better than a casual observer. Even if children do not understand their influences, there are more adults. First, my opponent never proved that there are more adults in the wold then children. He did not provide a link or any reason to believe him other than his word. My opponent might have been able to refute this argument if he could prove that because there are more adults than children, a unitary account on average would be preferable to a narrative account. However my opponent provided no justification for his claim. Also, even if my opponent had proven that there are more adults then children, he did not take into account people with mental disorders who were still lucid, people with mental disabilities who were still lucid, nor did he provide a definition of what an adult or a toddler was.
Random Debate part 2

This is the final part of the debate and there will only be one round. To begin with we go back to the person who can better describe the le of the person in question, the person himself/herself or an onlooker. Now if we take your example of who knows better the teacher or the student on the first day of preschool, sure the teacher can better describe how the young child acted but what do we know of how the child felt? What do we know of what happened to them at lunchtime, or recess, when the teacher isn't there to watch and only the preschooler himself/herself and those he/she interacts with. The person themself is able to give a better account of their life since they are able to show it in full detail rather than the small glimpse that the onlooker gets. Also a schizophrenic's delusions is an incredibly large pat of their life, why should we not dwell on what they believe is happening to them? Do you only care of simple actions and not how they feel and why they do things? Finally there is the point made that the debate of unitary vs. narrative accounts of one's life is not specific to those who are important enough to need an account of heir life made. I was not aware that this was open to all people so sure, a young child isn't really cognizant of all that influences them. However there are many more adults in this world than there are children, and that means that the majority of people would be able to provide a better account of what has influenced them than somebody else.
Trotskyism is inferior to Third universal Theory

So what exactly is Trotskyism? I. Well, Trotskyism (as you might have guessed) was founded by Leon Trotsky. For those of you who are unaware of who Leon Trotsky is, he was one of the major faces of the Bolshevik Revolution (1917) of the Russian Empire, a prolific writer, and a Communist theorist. Moving back to the subject of Trotskyism; Trotskyists believe in the “Permanent Revolution” theory (Also theorized by Leon Trotsky). Many theories fit under the category of this topic of Permanent Revolution, one of these being that a Socialist revolution can occur in a Feudalistic society. After this revolution had taken place in this society, the Socialist traits would have to slowly ease themselves into the Government, this first stage would be a Capitalistic-Democratic society, then from that stage to full Socialism. Trotsky also believed in a rewriting of Lenin’s (pre-1917) idea of a "democratic dictatorship of the proletariat and the peasantry”. I have also chosen the following two videos because I believe that they cover a lot Trotskyism fairly well:http://www.youtube.com...http://www.youtube.com... Trotskyism is one of the two main branches of Leninism. Trotsky also emphasized that the imortance of indpedent councils of work (soviets) to bring about a new era of a workers democracy. This concept is also a very important aspect of Trotskyism."The Soviet degenerated workers state was more progressive than Western capitalism and therefore worthy of defense against American imperialism; however, another revolution of the workers was necessary to unseat the Stalinist bureaucracy, who Trotsky believed would continue to destroy the workers state until it became fully capitalist."The main difficulty with Trotskyist organizations, groups, and parties is that they have been unable to become mass parties like the Bolsheviks or even become inspiring to the workers movement of any country during any period in the past 80 years or so. The reason why Trotskyist groups have been failing to cause this mass "Socialist Revolution" so far is becuase Trotskyist groups require an extremely high level of political agreement.Sources cited: http://www.marxists.org... http://www.conservapedia.com...
Trotskyism is inferior to Third universal Theory

"Con deleted his accout and promised to make a new oen and a new debate."I merely stated that AFTER this debate was over, I might just consider deleting my account and starting a new debate with Pro on a similar topic. I did not lie on either account, therefore you do not win by default. I hope that I will receive some points for my argument, messaging me is encouraged, I appreciate your criticism. Thank you.
Trotskyism is inferior to Third universal Theory

A Trotskyist society is one which is based on political agreement and equality. A society based on equality would show to be a more productive system because everyone is contributing to society as much as the next person. Everyone has some form of a skill, so if there is a job that requires that skill, that person should pursue that career and contribute to society. A Trotskyist society also is a form of government that is supposed to be used in a recovering state of a proletariat revolution. A major trait of Trotskyism is introducing socialist rules to a society with ease.And I have only a few questions regarding your finishing paragraph on gender equality."Women should money to support them in motherhood and no other should care for the child but their natural mother and father"By stating this are you saying that Same sex couples should not be able to raise children? Also the "Women should money to support them" statement doesn't really make any sense."Making a mother work is unnatural as their role is motherhood and new expletive system should subject them to do so."So even if the mother has raised her children she should not be allowed to pursue a career to contribute to society?Now I will proceed to explain why I think a Trotskyist Society would prove to be an equal or better form of government."Fearing domestic protest, the Libyan government implemented preventative measures, reducing food prices, purging the army leadership of potential defectors and releasing a number of Islamist prisoners. They proved ineffective, and on 17 February 2011, major political protests began in Libya against Gaddafi's government. Many of the reasons for the uprising differed from those of Tunisia and Egypt; unlike those nations, Libya did not have a large Islamist support base or civic movement and was largely religiously homogeneous; however, there was much dissatisfaction with the corruption and entrenched systems of patronage that were associated with Gaddafi's regime, and unemployment had reached around 30%" I feel as if this subject of the Libyan Civil War needs to be addressed. The measures that Qaddafi and the Libyan government took to stop this revolution is quite revolting. "The International Coalition Against War Criminals gave an estimate that 519 people had died, 3,980 were wounded and over 1,500 were missing" And that is just the deaths caused by Government Forces. Also, keep in mind "Proclaiming that the rebels would be "hunted down street by street, house by house and wardrobe by wardrobe", the armed forces opened fire on protests in Benghazi, killing hundreds." After that incident several senior politicians defected or resigned being shocked by such an out of control response to the Protests.I will now give turn it over to pro to discuss why he thinks that Third Universal Theory is superior to Trotskyism.
Saitama Vs Goku(pro for saitama)(con for goku) PLEASE READ ARGUMENT FIRST

Hello, here are some points of mine to counter your points about Goku and Saitama -Goku can only train in the Hyperbolic Time Chamber for 2 days or he will turn into nothingness. Now, since a day is a year in the time chamber, that means Goku can get 2 years of training from the time chamber. Plus if you count the whole entire rest of the year, it means that Goku will actually be able to get nearly 3 years of training in one year at MAX. This does still give Goku a huge advantage over Saitama on the amount of time he is able to train. But let me remind you that it took Saitama 3 years of training. From an AVERAGE human to a godlike being who could EASILY destroy a planet . This leads me too honestly believe that Saitama training is going to give him MORE progress in strength than it would Goku GIVEN time advantage. "The Chamber can only be entered for two days (or two years) at a time, if anybody attempts to stay longer, they will not be able to exit, leaving them in nothingness and not allowing anyone else to use the door." http://dragonball.wikia.com... -Also about the Saitama and Goku limit topic, I honestly think that "to turn Super Saiyan you must break your limits" is another joke Toriyama made about DBZ. I think that Goku just unlocked his potential that he was born with was unlocked through hard work. Now Saitama on the other hand was just a regular human, nothing special about him. Even the creator of one punch man(one) exaggerated that "Saitama was just a regular person before he got so powerful". Saitama actually BROKE his limit because he had NO potential what so ever to become this strong. Because in the video earlier, it was actually stated even after Saitama was doing his training over and over again for about a year or 2, he was still having fatigue. Normally a human body would get accustomed to doing a certain exercise, but not Saitama.
Saitama Vs Goku(pro for saitama)(con for goku) PLEASE READ ARGUMENT FIRST

My first point I would like to bring up is involving the time limit section of your proposal. I believe that this is EXTREMELY important to this debate, due to 1, the evidence you brought up and 2, the valuable assets that Goku has involving time, primarily Piccolos time chamber. As the show states, this allows 15 days to pass every hour, or one year every 24 hours. This gives Goku a HUGE advantage over Saitama in regards to a time limit for training. In 10 days, Goku could train 10 times more than Saitama. This also ties into your provided evidence, which for the sake of debate I will take as fact and will use it as the basis of this debate. Anyways, as the video states, Saitama trained for three years doing 100 push ups, sit ups and squats as well as running a 10km run every day. This, as the video says, is basic street training. This is stated in the show as well by Genos. This is important because your evidence shows the panel, that he claims, is where he ascends his normal limit or breaks it if you will. In a way in this panel he reaches a new level of being, one we don't even know if he can ascend further past. We have, however, seen Goku do this many, many times now and we know for a fact that he can ascend further. Imagine how far he can ascend in the amount of time you have provided, a year. With a year, he could potentially train for 365 years. Of course he would die after 365, but I would like to bring up the fact mentioned by Vegeta in which he states that Saiyans have far longer life spans than humans, so he could possibly train for 50 years, or even 100. So for all these reasons I strongly believe that Goku would win this fight after 1 year of training.
Saitama Vs Goku(pro for saitama)(con for goku) PLEASE READ ARGUMENT FIRST

Hello guys, today I am going to be talking about a famous debate in the anime community, it's Saitama vs Goku. Don't worry, I'm not going to make the opponent do any specific type of format for each round. This is a "freestyle" debate. Now, I am voting for Saitama. The reason I am voting for Saitama is because of the following; -In the anime of One Punch Man, it was stated that it took 3 years for Saitama to achieve his godlike strength. He did ONLY 100 push-ups, 100 sit-ups, 100 squats, and a 10k run everday. To get that much strength from only doing that is literally impossible, but Saitama defied the odds. -There are many theories of on how Saitama got is strength because the way the anime explains is QUITE unimaginable. Here's a video link on how Saitama MIGHT have achieved his power below. - -I also want you to note that Saitama was only an average man before he did his training. But Goku was a Saiyan instead. Also note that Goku started training ever since he was a little boy. But Saitama has only been training for as we all know, 3 years. -ALSO PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE CHARACTERS WERE GIVEN AT LEAST A YEAR OF PREP TIME, WE WOULD DEBATE ON WHO WOULD WIN AFTER THE ONE YEAR PREP TIME.
The U.S. Should Erect a Fence Along the Mexican Border

Thank you to Con for her quick reply.My opponent literally cut and pasted most of her rebuttal from Wikipedia. In addition, her example of the Maginot Line is "apples and oranges" from the border fence idea. Here's why.1. The Maginot Line only stretched part of the way down the border. [1] In the referenced map, it clearly shows that there were "weak fortifications" along most of the border, with only the lower third of the border having the set-up that Con references. Naturally, the German Army came through the gaping security hole on the northern side of the line.2. Currently, the United States has about the same set-up. Only part of the border is fenced, and illegals simply go around it.Con reiterates the need for a comprehensive plan, which I again agree with. The fence will not solve the illegal immigration problem on its own. However, it IS part of that comprehensive plan--and legislation takes time. Even if we pass all the laws Con offers, thousands of people will pass through the border while it's being implemented. Hundreds or even thousands will be victimized by illegal criminals. Tons of illegal narcotics will be shipped across the border to our schools and streets.My arguments stand. The border fence is necessary.[1]http://en.wikipedia.org...;
The U.S. Should Erect a Fence Along the Mexican Border

I would like to propose a debate on the idea of a border fence along the U.S./Mexican border to curb Mexican drug violence and illegal immigration. I will argue for Pro.Round 1 is acceptance, 2 is opening argument, 3 is rebuttals/cross, and 4 will be final rebuttals and closing arguments. Thank you for your time; I hope you accept this challenge.