Evolution/Big Bang Atheism vs Creation by God

First of all I would like to validate the Scriptures as a trust worthy reference to history, apart from the stories that may seem "unbelievable" to some readers: For one, we have very much manuscript evidence that prove to be unaltered and unchanged. We have many ancient manuscripts of what is called The Syriac Aramaic Peshitta Old covenant that all match each other Probably about 95-99% word for word. The New Covenant holds even more evidence. We have 365 manuscripts written in Aramaic (called the Peshitta) that date back to the 3rd, 4th, and 5th centuries that all match each other word for word letter for letter 99.9% all the way through. This shows clear proof of preservation of these writings. This shows that, apart from how unbelievable an event may seem, it is more trust worthy than the American and world history books of today which everyone regards as fact. You may know of many passages in the Scriptures that seem to contradict. I would like to hear a couple, because I see this happen too often due to either miss translation or miss interpretation of the Scriptures. Now touching on the things that are hard to believe, or deemed impossible: Many say that miracles that are written in the Scriptures didn't happen based on impossibility under the laws of physics. Let me ask, how did the universe BEGIN? Newton's first law states: "An object that is at rest will stay at rest unless an external force acts upon it, and an object that is in motion will not change its velocity unless an external force acts upon it. "http://en.wikipedia.org.........'s_laws_of_motion Antoine Lavoisier's law of conservation of mass or principle of mass conservation states that mass can neither be created nor destroyed. http://en.wikipedia.org.......... Within these two laws of physics alone it is IMPOSSIBLE for the universe to simply "come to be" out of absolutely nothing. But we know for sure that is did, somehow; and "how" is the debate. Likewise, as the BEGINNING of the universe is impossible and yet we do not deny the existence of it, we also must not deny the existence of the happenings of the miracles in the Scriptures strictly on impossibility. Rather, we investigate the probability if the God that did things deemed impossible under laws of physics in the Scriptures, Is the same God that did the impossible thing of CREATING the universe. You may ask, "what proof do you have that it had to be a God that did the impossible?" My answer: What or who ever did this thing impossible, had to be something or someone that was able to operate outside of the laws of the universe, being that the universe did not exist. something or someone this powerful, whether animate or inanimate has to be considered a God. And if done alone, the only God. So now the question is, animate or inanimate? First of all let us define animate and inanimate. Animate: adjective- 1. alive, possessing life 2. of or relating to animal life 3. able to move voluntarily http://dictionary.reference.com......... Inanimate: adjective- 1. not alive, especially in the manner of animals and humans 2. showing no signs of life, lifeless From Google translate. Think of this.. Can a rock DO anything by itself? how about a plant? water? a tree? no, because none possess life. What about a cat? dog? lion? human? The answer is yes to all, because all possess live, or are living. So we see that it is not an inanimate god that can DO something as impossible as CREATE the universe, or let alone be a god at all, But It has to be an animate God or, living God, that brought all things into existence. (ps. A tree or plant is not living given the definition (animate) that I used.) So recapping, we see that all of creation demands there to be an intelligent and living creator that operates outside the laws of physics. And if this is so, it would be no big thing for any of the miracles of the Scriptures to happen. Links to Manuscript evidence: http://tanakh.info... http://www.truthnet.org... http://en.metapedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.skypoint.com... The Big Bang: I will start with just one argument; When a spinning object breaks apart in a friction less environment, the particles will all spin in the same direction. This is called the Conservation of Angular Momentum. If the Big Bang theory is true, explain to me why Venus, Uranus, and possibly Pluto spin backwards? Also, 6 of the 63 moons spin backwards. Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune have moons orbiting in both directions. Why?