Women Love Men Who are Generally Attractive more than Specifically Attractive

I insulted your argument, Not you. There is nothing wrong with that. I suggest you stop belly aching and debate. You can define holistic anyway you want, It doesn't change what you're ultimately saying at the core of the issue. The fact is that you're trying to define physical attributes as a strategy. This is simply false. A strategy is a plan you come up with. Physical attributes are something you're born worth. You can't have it both ways. You're trying to make it sound like one can "strategize" to be more attractive. It doesn't work that way. I made it very clear when I took that debate that I don't accept rules that restrict my ability to make arguments because they're not rules at all but simply you goaltending. The very act of setting contingencies in a debate like you did is fallacious. Debates already have structured rules and don't need your dishonest additions. Okay, Before we go too far down this rabbit hole. All you've done is claim a bunch of attributes. You've made no effort to show how these attributes are more superior. You haven't shown how you can read the minds of every woman to know that your set of physical attributes is better. Woman like all kinds of weird things. The Burden of Proof is on you because I'm not claiming that any particular set of attributes are superior. Nothing you've name is a strategy. You're just naming attributes that can't be helped. Like chemical cues. Btw, Mr. Vague. What chemicals? Which cues? How about you stop playing around with your ambiguous claims and say something specific for once instead of trying to shotgun the topic with a bunch of non sequiturs. Only, The way you talk about this, It sounds like you read a dating book that gave you some "no fail strategy". As a happily married man. I'll tell you right now those books are dumb. The truth is that a woman decides if she wants you within a few moments of meeting you and what you do after that literally doesn't matter as long as you don't do something profoundly stupid. That's how attraction works. This BS about holistic strategies completely ignores the fact that woman fall for men without knowing anything about them. My wife spoke to me because I was a smooth talker and she likes my butt. There's nothing holistic about that. It's all subjective and anyone who says they have "the strategy" is simply a liar. your definition of a faulty comparison is also faulty. Okay, So you're arguing for attributes but falsely calling them strategies. I'm cool with that as long as we're clear that you're just using words the way you want and not by their actual definitions. You didn't give any good links to your data. You just dropped names. Without a hard study to point to, Your supposed sources are nothing more than some person's opinion just like your opinion. Nice cherry pick. You left out the part at the end where I said your argument is useless. Just because you might have some good points doesn't mean anything. All of your points are non sequiturs, So it doesn't really matter how good they might seem. Lets cut to the meat of this. You've named a bunch of attributes and falsely called them strategies. You've asserted that all of the attributes together are better than having one really good attribute. But you haven't shown any logical entailment here. You're going to have to do more than just "promise" me your system works. Where's the data? Where's the pile of woman you picked up with this argument? If holistic attributes are better, Then why did my ugly unbalanced self get married so easily? Your arguments simply don't add up.