there is nothing wrong with zoosexuality/beastiality

I’m sorry. Did you not pass your TOEFL? I’ll talk more slowly in this argument. [1] Let me get to most of your questions. First, I should answer the “Santorum” reference. Let me google it… “1. The frothy mixture of … “ [2] Oh, sorry wrong link. Here it is. Rick Santorum said, “In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality.” [3] You see, Rick Santorum got a little confused by equating, or at least paralleling, homosexuality and bestiality and pedophelia. So, when I say you used “Santorum Logic”, you were doing the same. “This is allegory.” An allegory is “a story, poem, or picture that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning”. Like when you say “Bestiality is not wrong” you’re hidden meaning is actually an anti-gay debate. That is not to be confused with an euphemism, which is “a mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to something unpleasant or embarrassing.” That seemed to lose you, too. Like when I said, “a man can't put another man's meat post in his chocolate chute”. I’m really saying you’re against two men having anal sex. You see, “Meat post” is an euphemism for “penis”. “Chocolate chute” is referring to the colon and intestines that contain fecal matter. Following? “you have made several nonsensical comments so that makes you a bad debater.”1. In the first argument, you said nothing I could debate.2. In the second argument, you said noting I could debate.3. In the third argument, you forfeited.4.If the fourth argument, you said nothing at all, except "what?" and I’m a bad debater. Let me get this straight. I’m the bad debater. It’s my fault I’m forced to sit here talking to myself. Allegory, euphemisms, alliteration, onomatopoeia…. BOOM! All wasted. I'm basically tossing you a free conduct point here simply out of boredom because you're not helping. You're like my McDonald's apple pie (caution, contents may be hot). I have to do all the work myself and pretend it's real interaction. Dammit, Jim, I’m a doctor, not a porcupine proctologist. “What?” *eye-roll* - I know I lost you again, didn't I? So, you have one more argument. You have a choice in tack to provide me something I can work with. I’m “Con” bestiality. I'ts just freaking wrong. Be “Pro” for once, ok? Get off the fence. Argue something. You can either:1. Tell me why you like to Porky the Pig, peanut butter the nutters for a little fido felatio, begin a bloody banging to the back end of a bi-curious black bear (alliteration, woo!), or pound the poon of a female baboon.2. Tell me why you’re against homosexuality, because you’re making a bad beastiality comparison.3. Admit it was just a troll debate topic gone horribly wrong. Look, it'll take me all of about three sentences to state why it's wrong and support it. I'm giving you the opportunity to serve & volley. Last chance. [1] [2] http://www.spreadingsantorum.com... [3]"Excerpt from Santorum interview". USA Today. Associated Press. April 23, 2003. Retrieved March 13, 2008.