A Libertarian Society Would Benefit the United States of America.

I'd also like to point out that just because it's written on lp. org doesn't mean I agree with it. People's version's of a Libertarian government vary, just as people's version's of a Democratic or Republican government. 'Whether you are pro choice or pro life I think we can all agree that abortions should not be taking place at 7 months or 8 months in a pregnancy. ' In my description, I never mentioned that I supported third trimester abortions. A Libertarian society protects the right of life for the people, and a fetus is developed enough to be considered a person in the third trimester. I'd be perfectly fine with it be illegal after 6th months or pregnancy because women would still have the right to abortions. Crime: Prison, perhaps. 'In short this is a statement that says among other things that you can do to yourself what you please be it marijuana, alcohol, self inflicted injuries, pcp, special k, lsd etc. And while such an attitude is quite fun to have is also quite irresponsible, most people while under the influence of one drug or another be that Prozac or weed or pcp have their behaviors changed and sometimes to the worse. So you will be punishing the person who took tabs of LSD and then proceeded to create an accident that killed 10 people' In my description I said I favored the legalization of soft drugs, not hard drugs. Hard drugs would go against Libertarianism because they are very addictive which can cause a need for rehabilitation centers, which would be paid for by other people's tax dollars. Also, drugs like PCP are very likely to make you cause harm to other people or property. The behavior change weed causes, is for you to be lethargic. If a drug causes you to be lazier, then how does it make you more dangerous? If someone took LSD and then proceeded to kill 10 people in a car accident, they could be charged with driving while under the influence, just like the person who just got charged for killing 15 people in a drunk driving accident. 'So as a libertarian you would support a clean and healthy environment. Great so would I, heck most people would nobody truly enjoys inhaling toxins after all. Now how do you propose we get the corporations to follow suit. The society can not enact any laws sloping or prohibiting uses and methods that are harmful. ' Why not? Creating dangerous toxins for others to breathe in would hurt people. Putting regulations on corporations to limit pollution would not go against Libertarianism. 'You can also not tell any individual what to do with their lands, so lets say if I want to own the grand canyon [extreme example here] and build the new soccer stadium with a mall and a theatre multiplex that would be great. ' Well you never will own the grand canyon, and I'm pretty sure the owners of national parks wouldn't just sell their land if they wanted to keep it natural. The next owners would be in the previous owners' will, and would be trusted to keep the land natural. 'Monopolies, legal. Check how that turned out with Carnegie and Rockefeller. ' Monopolies would not be legal because if only one organization owned a type of product, then they could charge whatever they wanted for it. That would hurt people's budgets, so it would not be legal in a Libertarian society. 'No free education, its better left to the free market. That way if your poor you get to stay poor, and if your rich well then you can become a scientist or a banker or a leader of the world. ' I don't agree with the idea of no free education or that the United Stated should stop being the 'policeman' of the world. The world needs at least one country to be the policeman and as much as I hate it to be my country, I still think it's necessary. 'So you want an army, but your expecting to pay for it without taxes. ' No 'I also wonder "mutually agreeable commodity" so how about body parts? How about sexual acts? ' Why not? As long as it's consented then why should someone else's choices of how they spend money dominate theirs? With the Retirement and Health Care, again, I don't agree with everything on lp. org. I was focusing more on an individual rights Libertarian society, not an economic Libertarian.