I would make a better world dictator

a. The taxation will be simple and easy to collect. Taxes will be collected at the state level which is signifantly faster than at the federal level. The particular tax plan, FairTax, ensures that almost all people pay less in taxes by the end of their life than with income tax. The fact that the wealth will remain in the hands of the people will make them happier and will make the economy better.The presence of forced slavery/relocation will present more problems than even the smallest taxes.b. I am not sure that I have said this, but my world would have a gold standard for currency. This means that there would be virtually no inflation, which makes a better economy and a happier populaceExcept for the relocated, enslaved, cultured, patriotic, families, non-christian religions, and athiests populance.d. Unlike your world, which is no different than how the UN is set up, my world would have completely free trade since it is completely united. This means an increased diversity of goods(especially since there is ethnic blending) and lower prices across the board.I'm like the UN? COOL! I think...Regardless, money doesn't buy happiness.e. Since most things are handled at the state level, every area can do what benefits them the most. This policy of state's rights will lead to a better economy throught the globe.Fine...f. My education system will boost our economy because people will learn to think for themselves and can come up with business ideas and more innovative things(with the aid of specific college education)Thinking for yourself is fine by you. Unless, according to you, you fight against relocation, slaver, religious supression due to "favoring", and eletism, which their world is full of.___________________________________________________________________3. Given these, there is no reason for revolt. Yes the first couple of years to the end of the first decade will show extreme instability and we would have to show strict control.Money does not buy happiness. The starving Africans do not care if a fish is $1000 or $10; they want food. They want to live in their homes, to rely on their traditions, to be a family. Your fascist (your "world" is fascist by definition) regime is no expressive of individual values.About "extreme instability": the Arab Springs would be first world compared to the crap you'ld have to face. Millions, nay, billions would be searching for you so they could kill you and stop your viruntly vicious and viracious violation of volition! But after this, the people would on average, be happier because of the better economy and freedom of religion that many of them did not have before.Money would not buy peace. Especially when millions upon millions are banging on drums and cutting your strings.Make no mistake, readers, his world has no religious freedom, or freedom at all for that matter.By favoring Christianity, you give a silent OK for your governors to decide to discriminate. By taking away technology, you enforce a kind of darkness upon those looking for enlightenment that no philosophy class can fill.If you don't believe me, answer this:Why not make Islam the world religion? Is it to violent? OK. Why not Buddhism? I'll tell you why you won't: you believe in Christianity. That's the only reason why you support a world religion of Christianity.Your view on counterculture would have merit, but you forgot to address that there is incredible ethnic blending due to forced migration. A given city may have five percent muslim population, which is not enough to start a powerful movement.You would not be facing Muslims. Or Hindus. Or Christians. You would face Humanity. With the churches that the state may open and the Christian views taught in school, many would convert to Christianity, if not, become very tolerant of it.They would not because the religion would be forced on them.____________________________________________________And now, for some psychoanalysis!Subject "Cowboy" displays symptoms of Narcissism. He has consistantly partaken in debates in which he illicitely condemns todays society and tries to create his own society in which everyone agrees, or at least, tolerates him.It is quite possible that he was abused as a child, by a parental figure or a fellow child. Regardless of the tormentor, "Cowboy" displays a need for power and acceptance. He wishes to press his beliefs upon people not in anger, but in a need to have agreeance. He wishes global Christianity because he needs validation for his religion. He wants people to consent to his rule because it will show him that he has control. Maybe he was not abused, but has instead had unmerciful disaster that followed fast and followed faster unil he needed control. Be it Dixie or be it this "world", he has shown need for control.He has this control prioritised over decency, perfectly willing to relocate, tear apart families, and to enslave.I sincerely wish that, if Cowboy is serious, he seeks help.Due to his possible Narcissism, he is not fit for rule. Remember, this is "I would be a better world dictator", and so, this is not ad hominem.