It is unreasonable to not believe in God.

Skepticism"We have enough reasons to accept the existence of human beings" is also a positive claim which, according to skepticism, is more likely true than false. God is meaninglessGod is not meaningless. Perfection is what is complete according to the standards set by the ultimate authority, which is God. There is no higher authority. Therefore, according to his own standards, he is the only being with absolute perfection, and the rest of his creation has a relative perfection which has to do with the purpose for his creation. If this is too complex for your atheist brain to understand, we can just get rid of this as a necessary attribute of God. I can simply say God is just the creator. It just seemed reasonable that if he is the highest authority, perfection is completeness according to his standards. And, according to his standards, he is absolutely perfect, completely faultless.First ArgumentI have given sufficient examples of the Earth's intelligent design in round 1. I can show you the evidence, but I can't force you to think rationally. Second ArgumentThe universe follows laws, and you can't deny that. Yes, we use names to identify laws we observe in nature, but there they were, before we ever named them. The water cycle is just one example. Interestingly, the water cycle was not fully understood until about 30 B.C. by the Roman engineer arcus Vitruvius. But every aspect of the water cycle was fully revealed to mankind in 1600 B.C.! The Bible's description is in perfect harmony with modern science (Ecclesiastes 1:6-7; 11:3; Job 26:8; Amos 9:6). Third ArgumentThe nucleotides of deoxyribonucleic acid are complimentary, which means that if you recognize the bases on one aspect of the ladder, you'll always tell what the bases on the opposite aspect are going to be. And the "letters", or nucleotides, can be combined in many ways to form “sentences”, or instructions that direct replication and other processes within the cell. Information is information no matter where it is found or what the medium may be. The difference is that a child could write “John 1800.” But only a superhuman mind could write the code of life. In fact, the complexity of biology continues to grow with every new discovery.Fourth Argument"In fact, the very notion that atheists are capable of experiencing such emotions is abundant evidence that their brains ARE working correctly"Um, no. We are all capable of experiencing such emotions at times. Atheists just do it in excess, which is why most live miserable short lives. It's scientifically proven. We "evolved", or were created, to believe in God. And when you sincerely consider the evidence, how complex and orderly the universe is designed, even how complex and orderly each of our cells is designed, how can you not believe in God? Because your brain is not functioning correctly. Any correctly functioning brain seeks to follow God because he persues us, he is constantly initiating and seeking for us to come to him, and because any person that is not devoid of rational thinking will not ignore what is right in front of them.Thank you, Con. This has been a wonderful debate. I look forward to reading your conclusion soon.