Rape/Sexual Harassment does not exist!

My opponent has dropped my argument stating that even if one woman doesn't climax then that means it is rape. As I have stated previously, even if 1 in 99 rape cases doesn't climax that means that there has been one case of rape. Therefore rape still exists. My opponent has also dropped my argument regarding babies being raped. Whilst it is true that some woman may say no when she actually means yes and I do not doubt that my opponents story is true. However, I think that everyone agrees with me that my opponent cannot speak for all women - especially babies. It may sometimes mean yes but as I have said before it does not always mean yes. I hope my opponent understands that they cannot speak on behalf of all women. Unless my opponent provides some evidence or a source then I cannot expand on this. My opponent has repeated this many times and the argument is no more believable than when I began reading their argument. The rape cases provided by me involved the victims being stabbed and tortured in some cases. Do you think that the person enjoyed that? If the person does scream and doesn't climax and is trying to retaliate it must be rape in that case. Even if that is extremely rare it is still rape and therefore rape does exist. I would also like to remind voters that my opponent has not provided a counter definition to mine. By my definition of rape I still win this debate. Rape does exist and is is proven by my news articles, my definition (from Oxford Dictionary) and by all my other arguments. Whilst all the examples provided by my opponent (blackmail, to cover their lack of loyalty etc.) that does not mean that this is always the case. If a 6 year old girl is kidnapped and raped to you really think that is to cover their lack of loyalty. Do you think that they do this because they want to raped? Many rape victims suffer life long trauma and can be mentally scarred for life. They can also receive sexually transmitted diseases. Do you think that they had fun doing this. If they liked it and meant to say yes then they wouldn't still be suffering from trauma and mental illnesses decades after they were raped. http://www.psmag.com...; My opponents penultimate paragraph makes very little sense. They state that their argument proves that rape is a lie - which I have proved to be a false accusation. They state that the lie does more harm than good. This doesn't make sense because I have proved that rape is not a lie. My opponent claims that people have committed suicide because of false rape allegations however no sources have been provided for this so voters should not take this argument into account. Even if sources were provided that doesn't change the fact that not all rape victims are lyers. There is no evidence for this. My opponent then goes on to list all the side effects of false rape allegations, this still doesn't change the fact that this doesn't always happen! My opponent has made grammatical mistakes in their conclusion: "i've used more spaces" My opponents conclusion makes many false accusations. They state that I have forgotten to prove that rape actually exists. I have proven that rape exists with definitions that have been ignored. Cases about babies and young girls / teenagers who have been raped. As well as this I have proven that rape can exist even if the chances are 1 in 1 billion. If it happens the it exists. Since I have responded to all my opponents points and my opponent has responded to very few of my main points I think that the winner of this debate is clear. In the final round I will make any necessary final rebuttals and an expanded conclusion. I will also provide the reasons to why I have won this debate in more detail. Sourceshttp://tinyurl.com...http://tinyurl.com...http://tinyurl.com...