Christianity is the one true religion

I propose this debate on friendly terms. I propose that the Pro has no evidence that Christianity is the one true religion. Here is why: Point 1: There is no more reason to believe in the Christian god, or even a deist god, than the gods of ancient Greece. It is impossible for me to look beyond the fact that there are so many gods to choose from that the Pro does not believe in, yet decides to look upon this particular god as being the one true god above in and beyond any other potential god. I do not want to assume that the Pro has never investigated these other claims, yet I am wondering if he has subjected his own beliefs in his god in the same manner that he has dismissed the others? Point 2: The Pro cannot provide us with contemporary, derivative, and comparative evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. The resurrection is the pinnacle of the Christian faith, such a great claim as rising from the dead requires great evidence. I know that the Pro takes this on faith, with no other evidence than the bible and his own feelings. Does he do this with all gods? Point 3:The bible is no greater than any other historically ancient book. The gospels are anonymously written, dates are not certain, geographical errors, contradictions, historical errors, comparable similarities from other myths in history. Just because someone begs the question that the bible is true this does not grant one grounds for holding that it is true. Now it is important to understand that I am referring to the resurrection of Christ as being viable above and beyond one source, and I am saying in the matter of the resurrection having only the bible is not proof enough that such an event happened. I am not claiming that the bible is not creditable in any sense, because that is not true. I will not debate that the bible contains some truth, I am merely stating that the resurrection of Jesus needs more proof than one ancient book professing it. Conclusion: Belief is something we do not always choose but rather it is a process of gathering information and using the information to build our beliefs. As children sometimes we are taught things that are not true, but most of us come to realize that these things are not aligned with the reality we experience as we get older. We then put off such things until a time they are proved. I have since never again believed in Santa Claus. I mean no disrespect with the example, but it is the simplest to use. As a Muslim or a Hindu we grow up with our care takers beliefs, this is what we do as people, we feel like we must pass on our beliefs, for whatever reason, but why should we believe things just because someone else did? Just because we believe something doesn't make it true, so if we are going to determine what we believe by our experiences then we are required to experience god. The only problem is what does this mean, really? If it is subjective then how can we know what someone else believes is true or real? If it is merely a faith issue, then what is faith, other than excepting something without seeing or experiencing? The Pro will have his hands full with this. I look forward to an interesting debate, with much detail and evidence for the reason why Christianity is the one true religion and that the god of the Bible is the one true god. I open the debate to the Pro.