Exodus the Palestinians to the West Bank from Gaza. Kill Hamas Leader.

Thank you. I will rebut in the same fashion I have previously. A few notes first: 1) Pro literally just restated his case. He did not rebut my points, make new arguments, or bring new analysis to the table. He just restated his case, which I have rebutted sufficiently to this point. 2) Pro, again, brings no sources to the table (other than a wikipedia source with unclear significance). This means, again, that the entire argument is assertion. "The Old Testament is theoretically true..."Again, Pro demonstrates that he just did not read my argument. I demonstrated, through argument and evidence, that the Old Testament is not true. It is not a historically accurate document. Thus, can immediately discredit its authority. Moreover, even if we accept the validity of the Old Testament, Pro needs to show why this matters in terms of international relations, which he has not yet done. "You cry humanitarian crisis but we let stuff go everyday. Russia can shoot plane down..."Two responses: 1) Firstly, the debate is about whether this SHOULD happen. Obviously, no humanitarian crises SHOULD ever happen. Thus, this is irrelevant. 2) We do not just let things go, generally. For instance, we have put massive new sanctions on the Russian government, demonstrating the global community's disapproval of such actions [1]. If you ask a Gazan if they would like to move they most likely say yes..."Two responses: 1) This is a pure assertion without argument or evidence, and should be discredited. 2) The West Bank is just as poor and marginalized as the Gaza Strip; however, under Pro's proposal, the conditions within would worsen significantly as the population doubles. This means they would not accept such an offer. The Palestinians really just want to be treated equally [2]. "The West Bank claims peace and stop the suffering, it does stop the suffering. These are facts that cannot be fought against because they're true."Two responses: 1) If they are so true, why have you not provided any source material that testifies to this supposed truth? 2) On the contrary, I have given evidence that conditions in the West Bank are bad, and would worsen significantly with an influx of 2 million refugees. This is pretty simply logic. "Why did NATO give the Jews a homeland? Zionism, the western world counts the Old Testament..."No, that's not why. 1) The UN's original proposal gave Israel far less territory, meaning they did not accept such an argument [3]. 2) The Holocaust was central to the creation of a Jewish state, since it gave the Jews both a reason and the means to create a new state [4]. Zionism certainly played a role. but it was not sufficient and was not accepted wholesale [4] by the Western powers. Conclusion: Pro has dropped too many arguments to name, especially: 1) The security risk such an exodus would cause, 2) The massive humanitarian crisis that would created by such an evacuation, 3) The inability of Israel to conduct effective pinpoint operations, 4) The absurdity of using the Old Testament as a historically-accurate guide to land disputes.With this in mind, these arguments, along with all of my rebuttals, must flow to Con, and will do so until responded to sufficiently (with argument and/or evidence) by Pro. Remember, Pro has the BOP in this round, as he is the instigator making a positive proposal. He has not come close to meeting it thus far. Thank you. Sources:1. http://time.com...2. http://www.thejournal.ie...3. http://whatreallyhappened.com...4. http://www.history.ucsb.edu...