If your an Atheist bring it on.

"As long as society interacts with one another, agreement on laws and morality will occur. Example, if I want to prevent murder, I can reasonably agree with my neighbor that if he doesn't try to kill me, I wont assassinate him in any way. For theft, if I want to maintain possession of all of my belongings, and my neighbor wants to keep his, I can agree with him that we should not take from one another. These don't require a God, or higher being to obtain, it just requires interaction within society." SENTANCE 1 With this there are alot of things i want to rebud for your firs sentence "As long as society..." well there is alot of things wrong with that. Just because society interacts with one another it will mean that society will usually agree on things like making laws. You are toatally rite. But does that mean that society will come together and make laws that arnt wrong. For instance I am very sure that Germany was communicationg with each other but does that mean that the PEOPLE of that nation were rite in KILLING 6000000 jews. Why you would even bring that up i dont know because it can be thrown back at you so easily. I hope you see that and if you do then the debate should be over for that. SENTANCE 2,3 These sentances are quite rediculous also because you are basically saying in sentence 2 that im not going to kill my neighber if he dosent kill me yes thats how society works thes days. But what if he was trying to kill you what would make him wrong if according to atheism EVERYMAN JUSTIFISE HIMSELF. So YOU HAVE BEEN AVOIDING THE DEBATE YOUR WHOLE 2nd ARGUMENT. Nothing would make it wrong because he JUSTIFISE HIMSELF now do you get it now do you UNDERSTAND the importance of a God because it cant be us humans that determinse rite and wrong because we change are morals all the time from one generation its fine to kill 6000000 jews the next Generation its not. Thats why there has to be the Bible and God that were are and will be the same. PART 2 When i said the Barbarians i meant not the "Vikings" way to put words in my mouth and actually the Vikings were terrible people but i meant the onse that faught Rome like the Huns who were just blood thirsty an didnt care who died all they wanted was power, hummmm kind of like Hitler. In your argument you said "Luckily, life does have organization and society interacts, debates, and reaches consensus on ethics. But life back in the Barbarians time when all they were was blood thirsty and killing raping torturing anyone in there way. So tell me what are we supposte to do in times like that when there is no goverment or when there is goverment but all the goverment is about is killing and conquering land. So when there is no organazation which there has been what do we do, what do we base what is rite and what is wrong. HERE IS ANOTHER POINT THAT YOU TOATALLY AVOIDED: If you believe that there is no God then give me some evidence that would make me believe that, give me facts that would make me belive that there is no God. If you can. And dont just say "well i cant prove that there is no God if you couldnt do that then why are you even debating with me. I say God is real because we dont no what is rite or wrong without him and the world would be toatal chaos. PLEASE if you can tell me why you think that there is no God then please state it in your last argument.