To kill all the gays would make the world a better place.

😊 That being said. The debate we are having is would the purge of Homosexuals from the world be better for mankind! and that is undoubtedly. Yes! It's true. Such atrocities were indeed punished harshly back in the day, however you are missing one very important detail- it did not work. People still continued commiting such crimes regardless of how severe the punishment- take this from someone who stuided Crime and Punishment for GCSE History. Also, you claim that these harsh punishments have reduced the amount of homosexuals in the world. I would like to ask you where you have gotten this information from as it seems like a blank statement. In the case of Sodom it did indeed work. it worked 100%. it worked so well people for centuries people have been using the example of Sodom and Gomorrah as a example in debates for how wiped out something was. People still did crimes in other places. yes, however in the case of Sodom and Gomorrah the crimes did in fact cease. True, but those events happened thousands of years ago. God destoryed Sodom and Gomorrah because yes, they sinned against him by practicing homosexuality but that was not the only reason. They had a chance to repent, but they refused therefore God destoryed their homes out of disobedience. Obviously destorying two cities was the last thing God wanted to do. Don't you think he would rather have seen these people repent for their sins and live happily in obedience to him rather than him be forced to destroy them? God sent two angels to try and find anyone who could be saved yes, but before when you was talking about "some good gays" to be saved none could be found. why was this? There was only Lot who did not partake in the homosexual ways. . https://www.biblegateway.com... "no one is entitled to commit mass genocide on an entire people just because we feel they're inferior or predatory. " -round 2(1) The angels did commit mass genocide on the rapist. (2) Gays are predatory "4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them. ”(3) God did not destroy their homes, He nuked them thousands of years before nukes was a thing. I. E Nukes should be used. Yes, but did God also not say in the Ten Commandments: "Thou shall not kill? " homosexuals are included in that list. He also said to "Love thy neighbour as theyself" and "do onto others what you would have them do to you" meaning treat them as equals, treat them the way you'd want to be treated. If you were a homosexual, I'm almost 100% certain you would not want you along with millions of other homosexuals to be killed. You are misrepresenting the bible with this statement. Moses said "Thou shall not murder" Murder being unjust killing. The two other quotes are saying don't mistreat others and rape is undoubtedly mistreatment. "Do onto others what you would have them do to you" is really bad in this context as it would be implying raping the rapist that would do nothing to improve the lives of the victims. . http://articles.chicagotribune.com...I am sure 100% of the sodomites who have been nuked wish they was not nuked. True, but when the reason for nuking is because they was they was rapists is surly justified. Well if the rapist is remorseful what what they have done, i understand it will be EXTRTEMELY difficult to forgive a rapist- someone who violated you and your freedom, but nothing is impossible. And if we were able ablt to forgive a rapist, God would be very pleased. What "source? " yo haven't given me any "source" just blank, unsupported, groundless statements. Even if the rapist is sorry he raped someone does not make the person un-raped. And forgiving someone is nowhere near as effective as a tomahawk missile strike. Based on examples shown God would be more pleased with the missile strike. My source is the bible. If you need a example on the effectiveness of forgiveness vs missiles it can be provided. I NEVER said loving the sin- I said loving the SINNER. God tells us to love the sinner but hate the sin. You can love a homosexual but hat the sin they're commiting. There's a difference. If you want to rid the world of gays, then do it the more civilized way- preach the gospel to them and let them know what they are doing is wrong. Because if we end up killing all the gays- who's next? We as humans- we're never satisfied. We aim for a certain goal and then when we reach it, we set another one. If we fufill the goal of killing all the gays, we could end up only killing each other. It's a VERY dangerous move and should be avoided at all costs. My bad as I was a bit drunk last round. At no point does God tell anyone to love the rapist and hate the rape. Based on previous examples the gospel had little effect to the gays in the gospel. They had to be nuked. Even God seemed satisfied after Nuking them. So much that he went on to other things. The people in the stoning videos are also very satisfied. There is very much satisfaction to be had all around. When the goal is met there is always something else that will come around world hunger, AIDS and more. With the time people will have not being raped anymore we could even cure cancer. And is killing the gays anywhere near as dangerous as being in today's prisons?