Pennington is NOT a genuine believer & Story book jebus was an eternal Jew!

Con writes: Let's sum this debate up so far. (1. Pro says I must be without any sin.)Composer(Pro) responds: I have already legitimately corrected Con that it his OWN choice of the KJV bible states and commands Con must ' cease his sinful lifestyle,' in order to genuinely ' abide ' in Story book jebus!Con responds with his objections to this: I have addressed the meaning here already but I will say it again. We can look at the words used in this verse: "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him." (1 John 3:6) KJV Abideth means- 1 : to wait for : await, 2 : to endure without yielding : withstand, b : to bear patiently : tolerate , 3 : to accept without objection.[1]Composer(Pro) responds: Using Cons choice of definition & choice of KJV Story book we further read that to ABIDE = 3. : to accept without objection.The immediate context in 1 John 3:6, is unambiguously stated as - ' Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: '.Hence & again using Cons own resources, the meaning Con won't accept but should is clearly - ' accept without objection ' i.e. jebus' statement that a genuine believer in him shall ' sinneth not! '. Again Cons chosen Story book further reiterates the context and stipulation to any genuine believer to ' cease their sins! ' Proof: i.e. Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him." (1 John 3:6) KJVFatally for Con, he is exposed also as one that ' Does NOT accept his own definition given = ' 3. without objection ' but conversely Con does nothing BUT strongly OBJECT to his own evidence and makes every excuse for Cons failure to comply and cease his sins!Con writes: So, while a Christian abides with Christ we are sinless because He has washed our sins away.Composer(Pro) responds: Deut. 24:16 & Ezek. 18:20 also refute your other introduced quote!Con wrote: If do not abide in Christ then are sins are not washed away. Composer(Pro) responds: Both Cons grammar & spelling here are particularly shocking and even worse more so, Cons various claims remain spurious in light of e.g. 1 John 3:6, 3. : i.e. to accept jebus' commands ' without objection, ' & also fatal to Con are e.g. Deut. 24:16 & Ezek. 18:20.Con writes: This doesn't mean that Christians do not commit acts of sin,Composer(Pro) responds: Fatal to Cons fabricated excuses; 1 John 3:6 is unambiguously clear that ANY genuine believer who (abideth = accepts the commandment stated in 1 John 3:6) & doesn't object; but Con strongly objects so much so Con denies the evidence and runs for other quotes to contradict the quotes that have been unambiguously shown to have decimated Cons claims!Con writes: . . . . it means they are already forgiven for them, therefore blameless. When a Christian ask for forgiveness of sin, it is not because the sin hasn't already been forgiven. It is because we must humble ourselves before God and know that we are sinful. This verse never suggest 'to be perfect.'Composer(Pro) responds: Indeed 1 John 3:6 doesn't claim a genuine believer must be ' perfect ' but what it does do, is show that a genuine believer ' MUST NO LONGER SIN! '.Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him." (1 John 3:6) KJVIt then reaffirms that those who do (as Con admitted he still does) is a deceiver who has - Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him." (1 John 3:6) KJVCon objects again & claims: (I do not have to be sinless, instead blameless)Composer(Pro) responds: Cons own Story book quote states "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him." (1 John 3:6) KJVThere is NO reference to ' blameless ' but rather unambiguously any genuine believer must " sinneth not! ".Con rejects this and objects to it and then dances around introducing other quotes, thereby Con obviously believes contradict e.g. 1 John 3:6?Con writes: (2. Luke 12:33, Luke 14:33)"Sell that ye have"This has been determined to refer to the rich, they give all they have. This is a example by Jesus showing that the rich has a harder time finding God then the poor. My opponent offers us his interpretation and I offered Biblical commentaries.Composer(Pro) responds: Again Cons spelling is atrocious, but regardless Con needs to read the truthful context and not the one (jebus states ' of little faith ') Con has fabricated for himself, in order to keep his carnal possessions - 　 . . . . O　 ye　 of little faith?　 29　 And seek not　 ye　 what　 ye　 shall eat, or what　 ye　 shall drink, neither be　 ye　 of doubtful mind. {neither...: or, live not in careful suspense}　 30　 For all these things do the nations of the world seek after . . . . (Luke 12:28, 29) KJV Story bookStory book jebus then clarifies Peters immediate question ' To whom does this commandment apply, to the rich as Con proposes or to ANY obedient servant? -Then Peter said unto him, Lord, speakest thou this parable unto us, or even to all?　 42　 And the Lord said, Who then is that faithful and wise steward, whom [his] lord shall make ruler over his household, to give [them their] portion of meat in due season?　 43　 Blessed [is] that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing. (Luke 12:41 - 43) KJV Story bookHence ANY true & genuine servant will have obeyed and parted with and sold their earthly possessions (apart from a few clothes & a few days food) and this certainly doesn't apply strictly to the rich, as Con suggests!"whoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, cannot be my disciple."Con wrote: Pro must show that Con has things that forsake God. He must show that I hold any pocession higher than God. If he can not then this argument fails. Even if I did, I am not a apostle(who this is referred to) and I am only required to path tithes, 10%.Composer(Pro) responds: Again Cons spelling & meaning is atrociously convoluted & fallacious!Does Con actually believe this command is to ' forsake their god? ' or cf. to ' Sell their god? '.I have no further response to Cons outbursts here which is clearly self-contradictory & frankly irrational!Con wrote: (I do not have to give all my possession because I am not a prophet or apostle. I do not hold anything I have higher than God.)Composer(Pro)responds: The reference is NOT exclusively to the rich as Con would have us believe but Cons own Story book states -　 So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:33) KJV Story book Proof it applied to everyone wishing to become a disciple! -And there went great multitudes with him: and he turned, and said unto them, . . . . . . . . . . . . So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:25, - 33) KJV Story bookHence the command to sell all possessions & give the proceeds to the poor applied & was given to the multitudes that followed & NOT as Con suggests applying exclusively to a few apostles or to the Rich, but rather as we have seen applied to ALL & EVERY wanna-be a disciple of jebus!- - - - - - - -Con writes: (Jesus is not a eternal Jew! )My opponent succeeded in showing that Jesus was born a Jew. Correct. He has not shown that after His death and resurrection that He remained a Jew. . . . .Composer(Pro) responds: Besides your atrocious spelling &/Or grammar again (a eternal Jew?) -Here ya go Con!Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever. (Hebrews 13:8) KJV Story bookCONCLUSION:1. Con is a confirmed jebus reject, fraud & agent of his devil & an agent of Cons Satan, also trying to deceive us by Con having been masquerading as an angel of light! (cf. 2 Cor. 11:14) KJV Story book　 2. jebus IS an eternal Jew!