Being gay is not a choice

"1)" In response to my (1) argument my opponent says that in the status quo homosexuality wouldn"t count as a mental illness because the line between bravery and stupidity is so thin, however this is not an adequate response because my opponent makes this warrantless claim solely by giving a quote and an example of Uganda, however my opponent commits the fallacy of using some example and generalizing it to encompass all gay people, but this is logically unsound. Not every homosexual is stating they"re a homosexual for bravery and nowhere do you show evidence that they are. My opponent just gives on cherry picked example of where they do, but doesn"t make it so that all homosexuals have a cause. Thus in conclusion you can extend my argument about how in the status quo homosexuals aren"t labeled as people with mental illnesses, however by my opponent"s logic it should, but since it doesn't it has failed. "2)" In response to my (2) ,this gets conceded, therefore extend the implications of it. "3)" In response to my (3) argument, my opponent gives the argument that if a homosexual had a mental illness and that someone would have figured it out by now. This is not a logical refutation, one can not say that something doesn"t exist purely because it has been proven yet. Something exists independent of whether someone discovers it or not, and one can not just assume that having enough evidence to say homosexuality is a mental illness is just as easy as finding out other illnesses. "Homosexuality is present in the subconscious" My opponent"s argument for this doesn"t show necessary things that it has to show in order to make this claim. First, their evidence only says if someone were to choose to be gay, then they would choose to want a hold someone of the same sex or kiss someone but someone doesn"t, however where in the evidence that my opponent brings up does it show that we don"t choose to want things? In fact there is evidence to the contrary, let"s say I want to want Puerto Rico, and then I go to Puerto Rico to go see the best attractions and in the end I end up liking Puerto Rico, I just chose to want Puerto Rico. "New Arguments Significant evidence of a gay gene" In response to my opponent's argument about there being significant evidence of the gay gene, just look directly under their evidence and it literally says there is NO solid evidence of a gay gene yet. You can dismiss my opponent's argument right there, but even if you don't buy that then let's keep going. There is NO methodology or internal warrant as to how they show male homosexuality and a region of the X chromosome is related, also related does not mean causation. My opponent has to prove that homosexuality is caused by this chromosome, not just that they are related because the word related is so vague it could mean anything. Disregard this argument made by my opponent. "Chromosome Xq28" My opponent concedes their self that there is no set in stone proof of this gay gene, at most my opponent shows that there are some studies that hint at it, but yet it still hasn't been proven. Second, this gay gene doesn't mean it isn't a choice, in the evidence it literally says it may (influence) male homosexuality, which would mean there is still room for choice. Then you can turn this argument against my opponent because of the fact that the evidence literally says it's only in 90% of homosexual brothers, 1) this is a small sample pool because it only accounts for brothers, 2) this would mean that the rest of the brothers ARE homosexual WITHOUT the gay gene. Therefore not inherent in those without the gay gene, and thus still up to choice. In conclusion you can extend the turn I made on my opponent"s first argument about people doing nonsensical things, then I'm also winning off the turn I made on the chromosome argument. The third point I'm winning off of is that my opponent has yet to prove their burden of gay not being a choice.