The bible is immoral

I don't appreciate debaters ignoring rock solid evidence that they cannot refute. "I would argue that the claim that the Bible is immoral depends on how you define morality. " No the bible is immoral. Period. Its stories of hate and evil of a superior ego god complex all the way though it and nothing else of a true crybaby wanting his rattle. And you are forgetting that this supposed god of the bible, well he has yet to be proved by anyone. You also forget that this god of the bible would ---never--- use text, the worst form of communication possible so that errors like these are made possible plus a whole lot more, well that"s of course only true unless this god is amazingly STUPID. And of the morality you are speaking of the reader is concerned, well that reader does not know that this god had murdered in his book 2,821,364 which included babies, children and pregnant mothers, oh and can"t forget men in which case absolutely nobody had to die, not for any reason. So if this reader is defending that, then the reader is not moral. The reader does not get that this god of theirs could have started off with peace, love, kindness, care, harmony etc etc etc AND KEPT IT. But no, this god of theirs 100% prefers pain suffering, ---- evil, anger, wrath, vengeance, rage, fury, jealousy all in which this god has freely admitted to, baggage emotions and are so befitting of a supreme deity of morality - right? Jealousy? Jealousy is nothing but anger as disguised fear. So that"s even worse. And even worse this god of theirs gave all of those wonderful emotions to man so in turn man could learn to hate. Great going god. Great going for those that believe in him. Ah who the author is. Loving of so much pain and grief. Right? So moral. Right? "Many of the examples that you've extrapolated from the text are indeed examples of what we may consider immoral today, but in the cultural context of the writing, it was commonplace. " Killing was commonplace? Ah yes and god wanted it that way with his ever so many genocides. You are doing so wonderfully in your efforts to prove thus far how bankrupt and morally corrupt the bible is when it could have been a book of peace. "Now, since we cannot dig up the writers of the text and ask them," Well then what you do is you urinate on it. Have you read the bible? Obviously not. Have you read the verses thus far pointed out? Obviously not. Oh I haven't even gotten to the god part. That"s for another debate. Tell me, how many so called christians actually claim themselves to be christians? Take a guess. And how many christians who believe themselves to be christians are christians? Do you even know? Its roughly 0%. That"s because both christ's laws and god"s laws are so ridiculously absurd and completely immoral that nobody except for maybe quite possibly 1,000 people on this planet can follow them. Here"s some videos to help you out. - Why Does Every Intelligent christian disobey jesus? - top 10 reasons why the bible is repulsive So all of what you ascertain as what you believe to be a christian goes to the wasteside. "just look at any Sunday school class for children"" and then you know nothing about god of the bible as he truly hates children. Here"s some verses for you to look up to see how "moral" this god really is god in his bible knowingly and truly hates children through numerous passages such as LM4: 9-11, MT 10:37, MT 2:16, JG 21:10, 2 SAM 12:11-14 which is truly sick and disgusting, DT 2:34, NU 31: 17-18, LV 26: 21-22, 1 SAM 15:3, HS 13:16, 2 KS 15:16, EZ 9: 5-7, HS 9: 11-16, EX 12: 29-30, IS 13: 15-18, MT 2:16, (EX 21:17, LV 20:9, MK 7:10, MT 15:4, MT 10:21), JG 11: 30-33, PS 137: 8-9, 2 KS 6: 28-29, DT 21: 18-21, DT 32:25, DT 2: 32-34, DT 3: 3-6, JG 19: 24-29, EX 12:29, 2 HS 2: 23-24, LV 26:29, JM 11: 22-23, JM 19: 7-9, JM 51: 22-26, 2 KS 8: 9-15,LM 2: 20-22, RV 2: 18-23 only to name a few and if you now think that god is in any way moral, then don"t even bother posting another argumentr, because I ost certainly will not respond. Here"s a few more video"s for you to look at just to see how moral this god is with children and how he hates them" - Atheist debates get em while they"re young - god hates children "David and Goliath" B. s. shouldn"t have happened in the first place. It---was---war! !! = Immoral. "Daniel and the Lion's Den about being calm, patient, and faithful, the many pieces of life advice from Proverbs," A silly little idiocy. And if you can only come up with only a couple if verses out of how many pages? You are treading a life raft in the pacific ocean. "So, there is good and bad to be pulled from the text, but this depends on the reader and what they choose to pull. " Oh I get it now. So you are the average christian that reads what he wants to reads, reads what suits him best for his wants needs and desires only and trashes the rest. "This by no means devalues the text," Oh it most certainly does devalue the text you are so so so wrong. 100%. I"m truly tired of you being wrong. So this is the final time and then I must get going for this round" NOTHING is established in scripture so everybody can get it wrong as there"s been 0 updates in at least 2,000 years. There"s translations upon translations upon translations upon translations upon copies upon copies upon copies upon copies upon dead languages upon dead langanguages with absolutely 0% of a chance to trace it back to the original. And there"s no original in the first place! So absolutely nobody is interpreting correctly. And within those translations and copies throughout the generations, characters and what they have said, especially with its leading characters, namely god and christ, their quotes/ verses have changed over time. Oh really? Who has the right and or knowhow to change ANY of god"s language to update it to whatever they felt like and or to amputate it into ---their--- language? Did they consulte god and or jesus to see if this was OK? Of course not. And more importantly did they get it right as an updated version to what these characters would say in this day and age, or even back then when the translations were updated? 100% certainly not. So once again god if as stated was reasonably intelligent would ---never--- use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible because he would have certainly have foreseen all of these major faults. And that"s only part of the reason why this god of the bible would never use text as a form of communication, the worst form of communication possible. There"s a lot more and all it takes is a little common sense.