cause+(and)effect=(is)logic

I accept with the understanding that BOP is on the instigator.The resolution is: Cause and effect is the same as logic.To win I must show that cause and effect is not the same as logic.Contention 11.) The definition of logic is, a set of rules governing truth.2.) The definition of 'cause and effect' is the action of causing 3.) When distilled, The definition of 'is' is, the same as and identicle to. This is also supported by the fact is means '=' in the resolution which means, exactly the same.4.) The purpose of cause and effect is to define a relationship between two things while "The aim of logic is...to investigate, classify, and evaluate good and bad forms of reason."5.) The purpose of cause and effect is Not to investigate, classify or evalute claims.....the purpose is of logic is Not to neccesarily to define a relationship between two things.6) Thus, Logic and causal relationship are not equivelants, are not similar and are definitely not identicle (the same) in value, amount, function or meaning".7.) Thus the resolution cannot be affirmedMost people think that logic is just using reason and coming to resonable deductive or inductive answers to a problem. This is simply not true. Logic is a set of rules which govern truth.....Just like the laws of gravity, logic has its own rules. The Law of Noncontradiction for instance is a law of logic which states that no two antithetical propositions can be true at the same time. This is what logic truely is.Cause and effect however is something of a completely different and incomparable nature. Cause and effect is defined simply as the principle of causation, meaning"the action of causing". Is means: "3rd person singular present indicative of be."...."be" on the other hand simply means: "to continue or remain as before"....furthermore if we look at the resolution, 'is', is likened to the "=" sign which of course means 'equiveleant to', which of course means "equal in value, amount, function, meaning, etc." or "identicle". Thus, overall we can see that the resolution translates to Cause and effect is identicle and equal in value, function and meaning to logic. Finally, when we look back to the definition of cause and effect, the simply action of causing something. We can see that it has nothing to do with and is of course not identical in value, funtion nor meaning ((as can be noted by the fact that cause and effect is not listed as a synonym of logic, nor reason, nor intellect or any other thing that even relates to logic)). Thus the resolution is negated.Again, please re-read the logical proof: 1.) The definition of logic is, a set of rules governing truth.2.) The definition of 'cause and effect' is the action of causing 3.) When distilled, The definition of 'is' is, the same as and identicle to. This is also supported by the fact is means '=' in the resolution which means, exactly the same.4.) The purpose of cause and effect is to define a relationship between two things while "The aim of logic is...to investigate, classify, and evaluate good and bad forms of reason."5.) The purpose of cause and effect is Not to investigate, classify or evalute claims.....the purpose is of logic is Not to neccesarily to define a relationship between two things.6) Thus, Logic and causal relationship are not equivelants, are not similar and are definitely not identicle (the same) in value, amount, function or meaning".7.) Thus the resolution cannot be affirmed I end my argument