The Generic: There is no God

1. Rebuttal"I don't see what is so different between the two (Big Bang and God). .. "The big bang was an event, whereas God is a being. "If God gave us a "free will" and doesn't care what we do, then all he is, is a being that created a Universe. " Who says God doesn't care what we do? That's certainly not an opinion of mine. Nevertheless, your quote acknowledges that God is a being, and is therefore different than the Big Bang. "I presented a credible source and a theoretical scientific explanation of the Universe's creation. You tried to refute it with an opinion. "This is a false accusation on your behalf. You presented an objection that would hold if and only if I asserted that God exists solely within time. As I do not believe this to be true, the objection you raised has no standing. "Are you suggesting that people who can't tell right and wrong don't have God? "Where do you get this idea? I haven't implied this in any way; these are your words, not mine. "Or is right and wrong simply a result of evolution? Evolution seems to make more sense is this argument. "The fact that you try to assert evolution as the cause of morality betrays your lack of understanding of evolutionary theory. Evolution, whether you're talking about natural selection or neutral evolution, says absolutely nothing about what is "right" and "wrong". Evolution is only concerned with selecting the most fit organisms so that they are able to reproduce; evolution does not care in the slightest whether the means necessary to achieve the goals of survival and reproduction are "right" or "wrong". Please don't blindly assert a theory that you clearly have no knowledge of. "Miracles are simply statistical coincidence. Example: If you were to flip a coin over and over, eventually it will land on its side. (. https://www.youtube.com......) If humans were to die over and over, eventually someone will beat the odds. God has no play in this. "You can't possibly be serious, can you? Do you really mean to suggest that if humans die over and over, eventually a human will "coincidentally" be resurrected? That's worse than magic. "I already gave an analogy:If the post-Universe was a plain, and you wanted to create a Universe, you need to dig a hole and make a pile. The pile is the matter that makes us up, the hole; the vacuum of space. Makes sense right? "No, it doesn't make sense. Not in the slightest. First of all, you don't seem to understand that before the universe there was nothing. No matter, not even space or time for matter to exist. So your trivial analogy comparing the Big Bang to "digging a hold in a plain" doesn't make sense at all. "It works both ways. .. You may have proved that God was there at the beginning. But you also proved that the Big Bang is a real possibility; and a better possibility than God. "Is this a concession? Also, with regard to the Big Bang, there's no reason to think that both God and the Big Bang are true (I hold this view). God was the cause of the event called the Big Bang. Therefore, it is God that created the universe, the Big Bang was merely the mechanism through which this creation occurred.3. Conclusion My opponent has failed to knock down any of the arguments I presented at the beginning of the debate. In addition, he has failed to provide even one sound argument in defense of his own position. Furthermore, in his last rebuttal he conceded that I "proved that God was there at the beginning". I think that as a result of this concession, along with the unrefuted arguments in favor of theism and the lack of arguments in favor of atheism, we can reasonably conclude that my opponent has failed to carry his shoulder of the burden of proof in this debate.