The existance of God (philsophical debate)

With your unit circle analogy you are confusing a potential infinite with an actual infinite. I suggest you look into that a bit. Actual infinity Actual infinity is the idea that numbers, or some other type of mathematical object, can form an actual, completed totality; namely, a set. Potential infinity Potential infinity is something that is never complete: more and more elements can be always added, but never infinitely many. "For generally the infinite has this mode of existence: one thing is always being taken after another, and each thing that is taken is always finite, but always different." Now if your saying this unit circle is potential infinite it had to begin, there had to be a first loop If you are saying that circular time is an actual infinite. I would like you to explain this unit circle analogy a lot clearer. The reason is is because in both philosophy and mathematics it is recognised that actual infinities are impossible. Now as for Gods power, it is infinite. But in is not any kind of quantity. We are not passing infinite to get to Gods power or anything like that. We are not counting 1, 2, 3, 4,.... So on until we reach infinite. We are just saying his power is infinite. This is not a kind of quantity. This may help you understand.... Quality: God's power is infinite Quantity: God has an infinite amount of power. Now we are not ascribing infinite to be the amount of Gods power, we are not using infinite as a number or to measure the power of God. It is a quality. In fact we dont have to use infinite we could just say, all powerful, unlimited, endless. Now before I continue, stop saying ex nihilo what ever. Its pointless and confusing! Secondly. For the 10000th time. GOD did not create everything from nothing. I shall continue. "Power is not something that, in itself, performs a task." Well it is not power alone but the power of the personal omnipotent being, which is none other than YEWH. Now out of gods limitless power he created the universe not out of nothing. For example, a house exists. It did not get built from nothing but by the equipment of the builders. Now as for the time thing, if we put a timer out side of time there would be no time for it to continue timing. There would be no time for anything to do anything. I figured this one is obvious. Christianity does solve the problem of induction, we have a god that keeps the universe in order. Thats it. Your world view has no basis for it And for logic. Your world view has no basis for that either. Tell me.. How much does logic weigh? Were do they grow it? Somewhere in Canada? How hot is logic? None of these thing can be asked about logic because logic is immaterial. And the atheist world view does not have a basis for immaterial things. You might argue that logic is only something that happens in the human brain. Well its a logic that the car cant be moving and not moving at the same time(law of non-contradiction) now lets just say we removed all humans were completely removed. This would not change the fact that the car cant be moving and not moving at the same time. Therefore the very fact that you depend on logic is you borrowing from the christian world view. Because the atheist world view has no basis for logic. In the next debate i will focus more on my logic and induction argument (also morality) because when they are elaborated on they in my opinion make a better case for Christianity.