' Christianity, Islam, and Judaism abrogate their common religious responsibilities '

MonotheismHi Rami, I will concentrate on one point at a time if that is ok. You said something very interesting in comments that caught my attention . You said(Rami), 'I could defend just Judaism.'In many respects I feel the same way about Judaism so why include them in this 'blame game'. It is a valid consideration. What shared responsibility do they carry if any. Let me give you an example. I was in Rome during an organized student protest about college fees. Student organizations sent people to Rome to march in their thousands. The march descended into violence and chaos and some people were injured. In truth the event was sabotaged by a collusion between right wing hooligans and 'stiff' authoritarian sources. These possibilities existed before the march began so therefore we must consider the responsibilities and the culpability of the organizers in not protecting their members. Was it reckless endangerment and imprudence on their part. It probably was.Now let us consider Monotheism and Judaism. Just like the students right for fairness and opportunity, I feel that the Jews of the OT had a right to have and use a God (Yahweh) that suited their needs. They are credited with bringing about the first real example of 'structured' monotheism. When you look up the word, you get thismonotheism: the doctrine or belief that there is only one God.Judaic monotheism was never this. The Israelites were very aware of the existence of many Gods among the surrounding nations and tribes but they affirmed a pact with Yahweh to ignore all others. Therefore, monotheism as purported by Judaism should have readmonotheism: the assertion that there is one appropriate God for you to follow.Just like the organizers of the student march they have now released upon the world, Judaism 0.1(Christianity) and Judaism0.2 ( Islam). Within these evolved versions the assertion is that there is in fact 'only one god'. This imposes the Christian God on all and within Islam it is again perceived that all people are under the jurisdiction of Allah regardless of their being Muslim or not. What a mess. Sort it out.You cannot have this advertising scam continue without consequence. We have not got room for these perceptions of a 'one God'. I must include the Jews in this unfortunately if only for being by default the parent host to this absurdity. What do you think Rami? Imagine if Coke insisted that drinking Fanta was reprehensible in that Fanta wasn't really a soft drink. Imagine if they insisted that the people drinking Fanta were really wishing to drink Coke and that in a way they were unwittingly searching for Coke. Can Islam say that Yahweh is not a God. Can Christianity say that Yahweh is not their God? If they can and they do then they need to explain it. Islam maintains that the one God changes 'peoples' depending on their worthiness and that a nation can loose this God thing. This explains to them how the defiled Jews lost their God who was Allah. They now hold on with real fervour to that God in case they in turn loose it to the Christians. The Christians believe that the Jews are still using an internet explorer god, and they wait for them to upgrade to their Chrome version. The Jews are sticking to what works for them and feign disinterest in the two other 'rogue' versions that are 'doing the rounds'Is the manufacturer of fireworks responsible for the reliability of his product. Is an older brother responsible for the example his actions provide to his younger brother. Judaism wants to ignore this thing but I feel that that would be akin to Coke ignoring counterfeit versions of their drink. What would Coke become if such a lax attitude prevailed. These new versions of monotheistic Judaism need to be reigned in and Judaism has a part to play here. Jews looking after Jews has not worked and their own children are rebelling on their parents. What do you think, ,Rami?