Evolution is a more viable theory regarding our status (Existence) than Creationism

Rebuttals1) "Biology still must follow the laws of physics. How does evolution follow the laws of thermodynamics."Alright.According to the 1st law of thermodynamics (Also known as the conservation of matter[1]) matter AND energy can neither be created, nor can be destroyed. So, we originally were single-cellular organisms. When we evolve, there is what we call matter duplication; matter is seperated into half, and the other half of both halves grow.According to the 2nd law of thermodynamics[2], matter tends toward disorder. Like said: Say, there's a barrel between balls. I have a wooden plank. Having established the fact that wood is vulnerable to fire, I ignite it. I throw it to the barrel. The barrel explodes. The balls are no longer where they were. However, I can grab them and return them to their previous locations. In other words, the matter fused into DNA because of an external cause.2) "The theory of evolution states that all life evolved from a single cell. Most decomposers are single cells. How can your claim “[B]ecause, there were no decomposers there yet” be accurate? "No; By that, I meant that no decomposers have yet migrated to decompose said flowers.3) "Like I said show me observations I have not seen one."For the hundredth time, I can't; My friend simply showed me a documentary of a scientist discovering and recording an ape evolving. However, I can't upload it here. That's why you can drop this.4) "Where did you get the idea that its not accurate? I am assuming your not a genetic scientist, why should we take your word for it? "I don't have to be a genetic scientist to be able to say so; Our estimates of animal mutation are based upon those we have ENCOUNTERED! Like said, mutations don't occur in a specific pattern.5) "I had an argument here that I deleted. I didn’t notice my mistake with numbering. "WOW! So, I guess you should've presented your supposed 5th argument here. TURR TURRURR6) "Asexual reproduction results in EXACT copies. How were there mutations? In sexual reproduction you get half of you DNA from your mother and half from your father. In Asexual reproduction you look just like your parent genetically. How did evolution come about if cells reproduce asexually and the first life according to evolution was a cell?"How can they not? Please elaborate; I STILL don't understand.Observation"I am not arguing what it implys I am arguing that this point is false. I don’t care about points or who wins or loses I think its fun to debate. "Both sides (Other than me, seeing as I have experienced this) lack conclusive evidence. So, having established what you accept, both lack, but then that implies the opposite. However, the opposite lacks conclusive evidence too. So, aren't you 1 amongst us (The last) to be lecturing about who's correct?Fossil evidence, Relation between humans and related living organisms, and Noah's ark"You did not debunk my argument you have not addressed them appropriately."Then let me give you a clue: If my rebuttal doesn't debunk your arguments, I guess you should have rebutted them for me to encounter my own errors, shouldn't have you? I now leave it up to the voters.Sources[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...