Deisim makes more sense then Christianity

Thank you for accepting. I am looking foward to an interesting debate. Also, I am sorry for failing to post before. My page 404ed so I couldn't post. Here is my first argument Part A: Questinable rationallity and valid ness of Christanity 1) All the contradictions in the Bible The bible has so many contradictions. Here are a few examples: -God does and does not dwell in temples -God dwells in light and darkness -God is and is not all powerful -Jesus is and is not equal with God -God is just and impartial and he is injust and partial. These are just 5 out of 100s of contradictions. This invalidates the Bible as evidence, as it has so many contradictions in it. When the religion's holy book is filled with flaws, it makes Christianity irrational and makes less sense. #2: Evidence for claims we consider inpossible The bible has many claims that we can't replicate today, like people walking on water, having a huge flood destroy Earth, and people raising from the dead. Since there is no proof that any of these existed, then they likely did not happen. If the holy book has no proof for its claims, it loses credibility even more, making Christanity make even less sense. #3: The stories in the bible are inpossible I will focus on Noah's Ark. The story is that God wanted to destroy sin on Earth, so he sent a flood to destroy the sinning humans. However, he had Noah and his family build an ark and take 7 of each animal, 7 males and 7 females, with him. However, this is impossible for the following reasons: -Noah could not of fit millions of animals in his Ark; there would be to little space -Noah could not of gathered all the animals he needed in his lifetime -The Ark's occupants would of frozen and ran out of oxygen as they were higher then Mt. Everest -The animals would not of been able to get to where they are now, due to there being huge oceans and all their food gone. -The Great Pyramids were build about 100 years after the flood. Noah's family could not of made that many offspring that quicky, or build many cultures in 100 years With all of this, it is irrational to believe in a religion if it's stories are impossible #4: Morals and the Christan God's qualities God is supposedly all powerful, all knowing, and all benevolent. However, this brings up something that questions these qualities. Let's say a 5 year old has cancer. We all know this is so sad, as the kid won't be able to enjoy life and will die in pain young. So why won't God help the kid? Either he is willing, but can't, or can but not willing. If he is willing, but can't help, then he isn't all powerful. If he can, but doesn't want to help, then he isn't all benovelent. This means one of the qualities about God is false. Therefore, the Christian God does not exist, as one of the required qualities is not a real quality. This shows that if the God is false, then it is irational to believe in the Christan God. Part B: Why deisim is rational. Personally, I would consider myself agnostic, but if I were to believe in a god, it would be a non current religious God. This God is rationale for this reason. - The chances of the universe existing like this and sustaining life are astronomically small. This means that it is rational to believe in a God, but not a religious God for the reasons listed in part A. Rebuttals: In part one, you state that deism involves a God that does not intervene in the Universe. To you, that also means that the God in question did not create the human race. This could be true, but the God could of created the universe and fixed it so life would eventually occur over time. This way, those low odds for life occurring naturally would be at near 100% because of the God. You also state that the bible should not be the prime thing used in Christanity. I agree with this, but Jesus taught we should follow the bible, so my points above are still valid. Even if you deny this, Jesus still taught things that we consider horrible today. For example, Jesus taught that we should kill children who curse their parents. If Christrianity teaches we should follow the teachings of Jesus, Christians should be killing their teens. However, we know this is irrational. You also state that because we do bad things, "sin" that prove the Christian God. How? I also question the validness of the bible considering all the contradictions. I wouldn't believe a book if on one page it says eating grapes are good but on the next chapter it says they can give you cancer. The resurrection point you made is good, but we seriously believe that since someone's body was missing from an unguarded tomb, he came back to life? You also state that there is no reason to believe that the bible was divinely inspired. But the bible states the word of your God, it states that God wrote it,and is also where you get your teachings of Jesus. I am sorry if I missed anything, or misspelled anything, but I am on my phone. My note. I am not insulting you, nor can I say for sure whether your God does or does not exist. I am not attacking your beliefs I look foward to reading your first arguments. Good Luck!