Humans are naturally inclined to being evil rather than good

I generally thank my opponents for their responses, but this makes the first where an opponent launches an ill conceived ad hominem attack based off of simple mistruths and avoids the main points of the debate. I will clear a few things up for my opponent and voters before I dismantle his very weak response to what should have been a fun debate. First, my opponent lists several points to bring my morals into question. He states that I support the following: Abortion Death Penalty War in Iran War in Iraq Water Boarding I was very surprised to see this list! I do support abortion rights, but I do not support any of these other listings. I checked my profile to see if I made an error when I filled it out about 9 months ago. Nope, my profile is correct. I listed Con for all these points except abortion. And I do in fact oppose PETA as the organization has lost focus and has gone off the deep end. The ASPCA is much more in line with my standing, not PETA. So Pro managed to get two points (abortion and PETA) correct. I give everyone the benefit of a doubt, so I thought Pro simply looked at the wrong profile, but his next sentence claims that I will change the listings proving me to be a liar. Pro, do you realize that changing my big issues would post in my activity? I can't change them without announcing them. You appear to have read the wrong profile, or you are simply one of the dishonest humans the rest of us must deal with at this time. Second, I am a democrat and a liberal. I make clear my stances in discussions. Ask around. Look at the forums. I just had a discussion concerning Gitmo where I make clear my feeling on the existence of such a place. Try harder next time, Pro and do not question my integrity. Population/non profits Really Pro, you must do better. How many people work for these organizations? How much of the population number listed includes people under the age of 18? How many donated to charities? How many benefited from charities? Of course the number of non profits will be lower, substantially lower, than the overall population. Did you see the total assets? 3,905,087,505 dollars, not bad. Waterboarding: According to the poll you cited 60% of Americans agree that waterboarding should not be used as an interrogation technique. That, Sir, is a majority even when applying the sampling error. In addition, if the question was, "Should waterboarding be used in the public school system" then the percentage points would be much higher in opposition to the technique. I oppose waterboarding and would have risked a court martial by not following orders if I was told to administer the technique. Pro has left the debate. He did not address my contentions from the previous round and instead decided to attack my profile by lying about it. Pro seems to be experiencing a case of physiological projection in so much as he sees the deceit in the people around him because he is deceitful. At this point, the resolution is not upheld and Pro has abandoned his previous arguments and presented new ones in this round. The population argument is absurd on its face and the attack using my profile is false and an ad hominem. Pro has not met his burden as instigator.