The U.S media covers up black on white crime and over reports white or "white" on black crime.

"Millions would watch a story about a baby shot in the face or a marine and his pregnant wife killed because the killer was a minority and wanted to take out his frustration on them."What evidence do you have that millions would watch "baby shot in the face or a marine and his pregnant wife killed because the killer was a minority and wanted to take out his frustration on them?" This is what my opponent claims but has no evidence to support their claim because this is based on their opinion. My opponent has just validated my case even further. It would be appropopriate at this point for my opponent to concede the debate. How often are babies shot in the face? Those incidents are anomalies. How often are pregnant women the victims or the initiaters of crime? Those incidents are also anomalies. If a baby was shot in the face or perhaps even a woman was shot in the face ratings would go up significantly due to the rarity of the occurence. "If people care about a kid who was suspended for vandalism and was caught with burglary tools they'll care about the 14 year old stabbed to death in her Chicago home. But they don't. Most pepper don't know. "They do know. They don't care. The ratings speak for themselves. The evidence doesn't support what you claim. Ratings are not up for debate when they are offered by Nielsen Media Research and other organizations which study ratings.It wouldn't gain over a million ratings on national TV. You won't find a single local case unless it is big as the OJ Simpson case which willl even attract significant ratings. But even then again the OJ Simpson case had nothing to do with race."The leftist media also covers up the many stories where guns are used in self defense--because it wouldn't fit their agenda."The debate resolution is about the "media" not the leftist media. Just for your information, I showed above that it was Fox News that received the most ratings related to the failed indictment of Officer Wilson."For example a couple years who a bunch if black teens best up white people at at the Iowa state fair. They called this "beat whitey night"....These stories were reported but the "beat whitey part" was taken out. "False, the local media detailed the story and interviewed multiple people, how is this a media cover up? The female police officer during the interview even stated they were investiagting whether it was a "race related" case. The female officer clearly stated that the teens were yelling "it is beat whitey" night. You are clearly mistaken, there is no media cover up. http://www.youtube.com..."In Memphis recently a group of black teens yelled "beat whitey" as they beat up employees in a Walmart."I have never heard of this case. You have not offered any proof of this case. You have not mentioned any suspects or victims in this case. Therefore this case is dismissed due to the lack of substantial evidence offered."A year ago when Australian baseball player Chris lane was killed by three teens the media labeled this as a thrill killing. One of the killers had sent out racist tweets about how "90% of white people were bad" and how he was going to kill some "wood". It's not just a coincidence that he killed a white guy as the victim was jogging. He appeared to have targeted the first white person."The media did report the Christopher Lane story. Not just the local Oklahoma media either, but national news outlets covered the story. Fox News and MSNBC had their usual sparring narratives over the Christopher Lane case[][].My opponent also sounds like a person with a political agenda here and watching too much Fox News. Why do I say Fox news? Fox news reported that the killers of Christopher Lane were three black teenagers, this was utterly false[]. But still, the fact of the matter is in most "race-related" cases, it is difficult to prove race was involved in the crime as a motivating factor.My opponent is inserting a political narrative here to suit her agenda. Just as the recent Ferguson case, people with political agendas inserted the claim race was involved when there was no evidence indicating that. Christopher Lane was killed by two blacks kids, James Francis Edwards Jr and Chauncey Allen Luna, and a white kid, Michael Dewayne Jones. There is no proof whether race was involved or not. My opponent is inserting something that was not related at all to the case. One of the three participants on the attack on Christopher Lane was white which was James Francis Edwards. On top of all this, the police in Oklahoma clearly stated it was not a "race related" case[].http://i2.cdn.turner.com...[]http://www.mediaite.com...[]http://www.msnbc.com...[]http://www.mediaite.com...[]http://www.huffingtonpost.com...My opponent is just ranting from point to point at this stage in the debate. Unsupported evidence about what the media is doing and not doing. My opponent even pointed to the Christopher Lane which the third person involved in the murder was white, Michael Dewayne Jones. The media has reported all of these incidents as I have shown. There is no media cover up, FACT. My opponent ignored all of my Round 1 points, for what? To offer us more speculation, more conjecture, and more confusion. I have offered the facts about the content of these cases and the media's invovlement which can be double checked if doubted. My opponent should concede the debate at this point because all of their contentions about a media cover up has been refuted thoroughly.