Wizard's Quidditch Should be Banned

FINAL ROUND1. Is Quidditch brilliant?No. The seeker is far too important. Harry scores his goals in like no more than 10 minutes of movie time, no way can the opponent go so far on the offense as to score 16 quaffle goals. As for encompassing different size/builds and genders into one team, the keeper could easily be the beater, and the seeker is basically the best of the chasers.2. Quidditch's popularityThere's a reason we banned collesium battles, they used to be popular, but people were dying too much and losing too much blood, and modern technology provides movies and shows where we can watch all the violence and gory we want without actually all the violence and gory. Now, the most dangerous/tough sport is boxing, but even that only breaks a bunch of bones, doesn't kill anyone--and keep in mind it's reserved for adults, while Quidditch is for little children who could easily get harmed and not handle the responsibility, unlike the adults in boxing. Everyone may have liked collesium battles in olden days, but everyone's moved on to less exciting but still seat-edge grabbing other-kind sports.THE DUMB SNITCHMy opponent says " people have brooms of different speeds". This only proves that Quidditch is stupid; it's just a test of richness, whoever can get the firebolt gets the advantage, not everyone has a set broom. In contrast, the different sneakers provide little difference in running sports. As for Harry's wanting the match to last a month, it's probably because he's only been through 10-minute-games and wants something fresh.Goal is not even to win: My point is, why do they do this in Hogwarts? Unfortunately, the rules are quite difficult to change, so changing these dumb rules in Hogwarts would be extremely difficult, so why not ban them completely?BAN USE OF WANDS? Okay, I have to drop this point, but this only helps another point--freedom of expression.The rules says you are able to put your wand in your pocket, yet you cannot use it? Wow, that's totally not limiting the wizard's freedom of expression. They'll be quite eager to cheat, especially Slytheriens, and again, considering the choas, the referee is likely not to notice. Furthermore, my opponent even says sometimes the referee disappears and is randomly found in a dessert, inferring that the players teleported him away so that nobody would be there to see that they had broken the rules. DEATH BY QUIDDITCHPoetic license?? Oh come on, we're talking as if Quidditch was real. Even wizards cannot survive such a huge fall.DANGEROUS WORLDOh, I'm sorry, that must have been a typo. Well, even the Chosen One wasn't able to defend himself, nothing shows that other not-so-worthy students would have been able to stand up to dementors.MAGIC PROP.SWhat I meant was, although everyone is forced to play, they would be unwilling to do so due to the injuries possible and the possibility of Slytherien cheating.As for muggle quidditch, my opponent hasn't countered that point. He has yet to make a case for why the 150 Snitch is better than that 30 point snitch. Thus, I believe I have fulfilled my BoP and upheld the resolution enough. All people of the wizarding world, VOTE ME if you want your children to be safe. VOTE ME if you are convinced that Quidditch should be banned!Good debate.