Luis Pasteur was a fraud

As per normal debate etiquette PRO is going against 200 years of established scientific consensus the burden of proof is on PRO. CONS burden of proof is not in proving germ theory; but in showing PRO as not meet their burden of proof.1. Germ Theory has never been proven to be a valid theory. It was only accepted because it was a way of making money out of gullible people. Money talks, so it was accepted and a huge pharmaceutical industry has since flourished to cater for this pathetic theory.As with all scientific work all of Louis Pasteur"s scientific papers have been previewed. His work also as the backing of literally 10,000"s of worldwide peer reviewed papers and 1,000"s of experiments that any scientist can recreate. 2. Luis Pasteur was a fraud and a hustler who married the rector's daughter and became a famous scientist by stealing all the experiments of other scientists. Thus, he was similar to Einstien in that he was dull and stupid in science but was clever in decieving people. Thus, both Pasteur and Einstein were both thieving frauds who stole all their ideas from other people.Louis Pasteur and Einstein were well versed in many theories and both took inspiration from others. In science what matters is the first person to have a peer reviewed paper with the theory that get the credit for the theory. Just in the same way Steve Jobs gets credit for Apple because he was the CEO even though all he did was sell Steve Wozniak"s inventions because in industry the business leader gets all the credit. 3. Antoine Bechamp was the real expert on Germ Theory. But his theory differed from Pasteur in that he stated that "germs are the result of a disease and are not the cause of it"That is not Antoine Behamps theory. His theory is, "that the "molecular granulations" in biological fluids were actually the elementary units of life, B"champ named them microzymas"that is, "tiny enzymes""and credited them with producing both enzymes and cells while "evolving" amid favorable conditions into multicellular organisms. Denying that bacteria could invade a healthy animal and cause disease, B"champ claimed instead that unfavorable host and environmental conditions destabilize the host's native microzymas, whereupon they decompose host tissue by producing pathogenic bacteria. While cell theory and germ theory gained widespread acceptance, granular theories became obscure. B"champ's version, microzymian theory, has been retained by small groups, especially in alternative medicine"https://en.wikipedia.org...As of this moment no one has found his microzymas or shown they decompose cells.4. Prior to agriculture, there was no disease. Agricultural products are the cause of 98% of all diseases. These products include sugar, grain and dairy. The other 2% are caused by dangerous chemicals such as chlorine, bromine and flourine. These chemicals are known as halogens which cause a disruption of the human hormone system. The hormone system is an iodine based system which is vulneable to disruption by rogue halogens as listed above.Trichomonas gallinae is a single celled organism that causes disease (AKA a germ) called canker in birds. An early form of Trichomonas gallinae has been found in Tyrannosaurus rex fossils. There is scientific proof of germs causing disease from 65 million years before the invention of agriculture.https://en.wikipedia.org...https://microbiologybytes.wordpress.com...5. When Germ Theory was formulated nobody knew anything about hormones, gut bacteria and leaky gut syndrome. Thus, Germ Theory is a totally moronic theory which disregards all knowledge of how hormones work; how the gut leaks when agrivated by grain products and how bacteria enter the blood stream internally instead of externally. Thus, the internal leakage of bacteria is a more logical explanation of disease than the exterior invasion model of disease. Therefore, Germ Theory is false because it assumes that the germs come from exterior sources.Germ theory includes germs coming from internal sources. "Vector transmission may be external or internal. External, or mechanical, transmission occurs when organisms are carried mechanically on the vector (for example, Salmonella organisms that contaminate the legs of flies). Internal transmission occurs when the organisms are carried within the vector. "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...