Mind controls the brain, instead of being controlled by it

At the outset I want to clarify a few things. I am participating in two more debates in this website. The topics of those debates are as under: - 1. Mind has a Material Basis 2. Mind was the last thing to come into existence I have taken the con stand in both the above debates. Since the subject matter of all three debates relates to the nature of "Mind" and since one of my basic contentions in all three debates is that Mind does not have a material basis or mind is not a part of the brain, arguments put forth by me in support of my contention are similar. Next I want to clarify my stand regarding my friend's argument about part and whole. I agree that I haven't refuted the argument that parts can't control the whole, but I reiterate that the argument is rendered futile in the context of this debate, as my friend has not been able to present any proof that mind is a part of the brain. Next I will comment on my friend's views on the study of NDE at seriatim: 1. The study doesn't explicitly say that Mind controls the brain. But it does imply that Mind can survive without the brain and therefore brain doesn't control the mind. For "causal correlations" between mind and the brain to exist it follows as a logical corollary that mind controls the brain. It is pertinent to mention here that I have provided evidence that mind can actively exist without the brain. In the same lines I request my friend (con) to provide at least one instance where a brain can actively exist without a mind. 2. The question why only 18% of the subjects remembered the NDE can be answered by referring to our experiences in a dream state. How often do we remember dreams? When we do we hardly remember every single detail of our dream. In most cases we don't remember anything at all. So it is possible that the remaining subjects also had an NDE, but were not able to recall it. 3. The mind was "active" while there was no neural activity. That is what I wanted to show, when I referred to the study. Since mental activity persists after "brain death" the brain evidently does not control the mind. Till, now my friend (con) has not been able to either disprove the proposition ‘A' or provide a single proof to support the proposition ‘B'. Therefore, for "causal correlation" to exist between the mind and the brain the proposition ‘A' that is mind controls the brain has to be true. I believe any rational and sensible reader will be convinced with that argument. Further, to support my claim that mind can controls the brain I would like to refer to "Research on Meditation", which suggests that the meditating mind is able to regulate frequency of brain waves. Please lookup the following link in this regard:- . http://en.wikipedia.org... I regard this as direct evidence of the fact that the mind controls the brain. I hope in the last round my friend will come up with some EVIDENCE to support AT LEAST ONE of the following propositions, failing which he won't be able to convince any RATIONAL mind: 1. The brain controls the mind; OR 2. The brain activity can exist without a mind; OR 3. The mind is the part of the brain (which was his original proposition) Although, even if he is able to do that I would be deprived from cross-examining such evidence since this is the last round.