The governors of the United States are justified in rejecting Syrian refugees

It seems there has been a long break on this debate. My opponent pro has not forfeited the fourth round due to life circumstances, and has posted in the comment section, which I will accept and will refer others to go over. Pro made a list of what the Qur'an teaches to Muslims and the success of ISIS. I would like to also make a correction in my round 3, which I addressed in the comment section, but forgot to in the actual debate. In the second sentence, I claimed that "[I]t should be a comparison of religion..." when it should be "shouldn't".I shall begin my closing statements. With the heated events still going around in the world, I have set out to argue against the justifications of the governors' action in rejecting Syrian refugees. I believe that a person should not be persecuted for their religion as it is also set forth in the Constitution of freedom of religion. I also made the effort to argue against using religion to persecute against these refugees and have shown that regardless of any religion, Christianity or Islam, that religious violence can still exist on any sides. Pro has also claimed that "[M]uslims are more apt to be terrorists than Christian refugees, are..." but I provided the evidence to show that not even 1% of Muslims are pursuing this violence, which is similar to Christianity, and that ISIS is a bad representation of Islam. I went on to present my argument for "Not all Muslims are terrorists, and not all terrorists are Muslim". Using religion to persecute a person is in poor taste since you can cherry pick the bad parts and apply those bad parts to people, which might not be a representation of the person. That is the straw man fallacy. Rarely do I see someone cherry picked the good parts of religion.In the comment section, pro makes the claim that Paris is not in Belgium, which I agree, but what pro missed out was my whole point. A person is able to freely travel across Europe if they are a citizens and still be able to commit these terrorist acts. I recommend pro carefully read what was presented in round 4. My intentions were to show that these governors are so focused on rejecting the majority of innocent refugees, but there is no system to stop these terrorists, most who are already residing in the nation, from travelling around and still not get caught.I felt the main justifications that these governors had are hate and fear for rejecting these refugees, which I believe is not justifiable. During this whole debate, I made the assumption that Muslims are people too so I did not mentioned it. These people, who happen to be refugees because they have the very same fear of terrorism are trying to flee for their lives, yet American people have this same fear of an unlikely terrorism act when a tragedy happens. The tragedy of once in a while just does not compare to the tragedy of everyday for these innocent refugees. The number of causalities does not even compare. To prevent tragedies though, there should be a national security system, which I brought up during the debate. The system is still able to catch these terrorists, but I must admit that it is in no way perfect. Nothing is.+-+-+-+Thus, I conclude my closing statements and will now focus on pro's other concerns that will be irrelevant to this debate. For the most part, I agree with pro that I do not want to allow terrorists into our great nation, but not allowing innocent refugees is not what I believe America stands for. I do not know the full details of the screening process or how an organization like the FBI specifically tracks down these terrorists while trying to not infringe on the rights of an American, but they do and it is their job to do so and create a successful system. The United States is the most diverse of all nations because it was able to accept anybody, regardless of culture, religion, and ethnicity. It was able to thrive because not everybody has the same perspective and everybody can see things differently, but we as people, still have the same values, to live free and pursue our dreams, the American dream.The United States has the most intensive programs compared to other nations when it comes to immigrants and refugees and it is very successful. The Intentional Rescue Committee, which I am proud to become a volunteer is one of those organizations that is part of the solution to a problem. Although the United States is known for its guns and the lobbying powers of the National Rifle Associations, the United States is actually a great leader when it comes to any humanitarian efforts not only in the United States, but across the world. How are they going to eat? There are many great organizations like Feeding America and welfare systems. Not only that, but there are actually buses and trolleys to transport people. Cars are not the only way to get from point A to B. Learning English would be more of a challenge then getting a job, especially a manufacturing or minimum wage job to at least support themselves. Eventually, they can contribute to society and into a growing economy. Of course, these systems are not truly perfect, but at least it is a step towards the solution instead of going towards hate and fear.