Gun Rights in all locations should be legalized.

Rebuttals"Nobody will pay tens of thousands for a gun unless they are an organized crime syndicate, and they will just import their guns. "First of all, most criminals will do anything in order to commit a crime. Motivations include the death of a relative or friend can result in more physical harm to another. For example, if someone kills someone's loved one, they may feel the urge of vengence. In the T. V. show, "Lie to Me," the fifth episode, "Unchained," the wife of a the victim of a murder, attempts to kill the murderer during his parole. Guns are made to kill. And guns will be here as long as there are evil people in the world. The outlawing of guns will not eliminate the presence of guns. In fact, the outlawing of guns will strip away the first aid protection of law abiding citizens. This means the criminals will still have guns, but more importantly, the people will not have guns. They will not have protection. If a gun law stating there are to be no guns is passed, here's what's going to happen: Citizens will not have guns. Criminals will have guns. Which makes criminals all the more dangerous. You see, laws do not affect law breakers. I mean, if someone breaks into your house trying to murder you, you can't just call 911 at gunpoint! Like I said, guns can still be accessed from the black market, thousands of dollars or not, criminals still have motivations to absolutely get a gun no matter the cost. So, I need to know, do you agree that if we take away guns, citizens will not have protection? And, do you agree that, if we take away guns, criminals will still break laws? Do you agree that, if we make guns illegal, criminals will still have guns because of their habit to possess illegal things? The criminals will have guns. We will not. This is a frightening concept when you consider that gun crimes usually result in more fatalities than knife crimes. And so, even though the criminal did it, the gun allowed more damage to be done. And I do not see how criminals breaking laws is that hard to believe, much less a complex question that requires a paragraph of an answer. Regardless, I should think a crime is easier to commit when you know the victim is unarmed. And, do you think that if guns were to become illegal criminals would stop trying to get guns? It is far easier for a person to obtain a legal gun than an illegal gun. But, if it came down to where guns would be illegal, I have reason to believe criminals would get guns somehow if they really wanted to. No matter how you slice it or dice it: Criminals will always have guns. Even if they spend thosusands of dollars. Civillians will not have guns to protect themselves, and the few civillians that do protect themselves will be killed or abused. The ban of guns will not only decrease the defense in civilians, but will also make the urge to kill more motivational. If nobody has one particular thing, the urge to get it can increase even more. For example, would you rather do a particular task with a rare non-used, (Guns per say) item? Or a overly-used, (Knives or other weapons per say) object? Scottsdale, Arizona is ranked one of the top cities with the lowest crime rate, and get this: It has almost NO gun control. "Scottsdale, AZ tops our list mainly due to the low number of violent crimes. "- . http://www.areavibes.com...... . http://en.wikipedia.org...... Plano, TX is also a top ranking in the top 10 cities with lowest crime rate. And: It has little to no gun laws! Surprise, surprise! Third on the list is Virginia. You will see that here, as crime rate goes up, so do gun laws, little by little. So, really, as long as we exist, guns will too. And we will never be rid of them. But these statistics show that towns with no gun laws are generally safer than ones with gun laws.