America can get conquered

Pro's claim that western democracies conquered the USSR is false. Internal troubles done in the Soviets, it also doesn't coincide with the definition of conquer "to take control of (a country, city, etc.) through the use of force" western democracies didn't defeat the Soviets, the Soviets defeated the Soviets. Rather the United States can or can't beat itself has nothing to do with rather or not Al Qaeda, Russia, China, the Vatican City ect can. I never said that America is safe from war or external threats. So when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, Al Qaeda attacked New York, the Pentagon, and an empty field, when China attacked in the cyber world. That doesn't mean that they can conquer the United States by what would be required to conquer the United States. Nuclear weapons would be used and the following nuclear winter and an new extinction event would negate every side's achievements up to the point before nuclear weapons were used. That would still leave America has unconquered. Size and manpower were the reason why the Soviets were not conquered by the Germans. The Russo-Japanese War was a war fought outside of Russia's national boundaries and Japan was not attempting conquest of Russia but Korea and Manchuria. The Siberian occupation failed to achieve what it was meant to. None of these is relevant to America's surviveability. Apparently not even close to being as well armed as Americans. From your source he was going to use a gun that was over 100 years old. It also says that Iraqis were dusting off corroded weapons. The American population is over 2x that number + 13 million hunters I even see tanks parked owned by citizens, there are no federal laws against the ownership of flamethrowers. Every single one of them highly patriotic whereas Iraqis were questionable allegiance to their government The Iraqi insurgency, however, was widespread and caused more American lives and resources then the war in Afghanistan. The advantages that has protected the United States in the 19th and 20th centuries will ensure American sovereignty for centuries more. ASYMMETRIC WARFARE will not conquer the United States, it can defeat American efforts overseas but its not going to conquer America. The United States has its own space fighter and has plans for Mars, being the nation with a robot traveling the planet's service. China's manned mission to the Moon... The world is playing catch up. Canada is top 3 in largest oil reserves, by 2020 the United States is to be one of the biggest producers. America's sources of oil is global to prevent what happened in the 1970s As a lot of the wars fought by the United States a lot of them took place against other powers in North America, the United States conquered a lot of them which became states. Looking at the Trump article, he said "I"m never going to rule anything out"I wouldn"t want to say. Even if I wasn"t, I wouldn"t want to tell you that because at a minimum, I want them to think maybe we would use them," A lot of your response speaks on the vulnerabilities of deterrents that hasn't helped America from being totally safe but it doesn't help you with proving that America can be conquered. Each of these deterrents has made conquest of nations very difficult and even impossible for even the most powerful of nations. Russia couldn't be conquered by the Germans cause of sheer size and population. This is the same for China. However, the Mongols conquered them but they couldn't conquer Japan whom were protected by the oceans. Britain hasn't be conquered cause of their location and technology.. The United States has all the advantages magnified. The United States has over 24 formal allies, nuclear weapons, the largest military in the world, are ahead of the world in space, one of the most populace nations in the world, the most armed nation in the world, extremely far from other nations whom could pose a threat to the United States if they were to border us. The United States has their drones but they are also creating other robots as well. http://www.npr.org... http://www.bloomberg.com... http://www.theweek.co.uk...