Donald Trump's "Muslim Ban" is unconstitutional.

I look forward to this. 1. President Obama, made a list of "countries of concern". This is substantially different than putting an executive order into place, banning people from entering the country. Trump's ban originally included green card holders; that in itself is unprecedented. a) President Obama as proven by CON's statement, was for careful vetting of the people coming into our country. Unlike Trump, President Obama did not make a sweeping generalization of the people coming into our country. b) This executive order is more than just a ban from countries that have been "exposed" to terrorism. If this was the case essentially all countries would be banned from entering the United States. This is due to the fact that the majority of countries have been exposed to terrorism in some way.2. Donald Trump's presidential campaign was based around the fact of a "Muslim registry". Since there is no specific way to tell whether or not someone practices Islam, this "temporary ban" is the next best thing. 3. Addressing CON's statement: "why are the 3 countries with the largest Muslim population Indonesia, India, and Pakistan not mentioned in the order? " The reason behind these countries not being addressed in the order are as follows:a) Ivanka Trump's dresses are made in China, Indonesia, and Vietnam. During the last fiscal year, Ivanka Trump's clothing incorporation made $100 million in revenues. [1], [2]4. Why were these seven countries chosen? a) Nationals of the seven states that have been banned have killed zero people on U. S. soil between 1975 and 2015. Six Iranians, six Sudanese, two Somalis, two Iraqis, and one Yemeni have been convicted of attempting or executing terrorist attacks on U. S. soil during this time period. b) Over the past four decades, only 20 out of 3.25 million immigrants granted access to the United States have been convicted of attempting or committing terrorism on U. S. soil. Only 3 American citizens were killed by refugees all stemming from Cuba in the 1970s. c) Zero nationals from Syria / Libya have been convicted of these crimes. 5. If this Muslim ban is really dedicated to keeping America safe why aren't Saudia Arabia, The United Arab Emirates, and Egypt included on this list? Here are the statistics: [3]Saudia ArabiaNumber of Terrorists: 19Number of Murders: 2,369United Arab EmiratesNumber of Terrorists: 2Number of Murders: 314Egypt Number of Terrorists: 11Number of Murders: 1626. Coming to my final point, CON quoted the following law: "(3) Security and related grounds. -(A) In general. -Any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney Generalknows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States toengage solely, principally, or incidentally in-(i) any activity (I) to violate any law of the United States relating toespionage or sabotage or (II) to violate or evade any law prohibiting the exportfrom the United States of goods, technology, or sensitive information,(ii) any other unlawful activity, or(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control oroverthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or otherunlawful means, is inadmissible. (B)Terrorist activities-IN GENERAL. -Any alien who-(I) has engaged in a terrorist act(II) a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of HomelandSecurity knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likelyto engage after entry in any terrorist activity (as defined in clause (iv));(III) has, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death orserious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity;"This law has already been put into place, so the addition of more laws especially those of executive orders are uneccessary and as proven by recent protests, lead to more chaos. Good luck! [1]: . http://www.teenvogue.com...[2]: . http://www.forbes.com...[3]: . https://www.theatlantic.com...