Hell does not exist.

Pro has brought up some excellent points which I will attempt to address. -Rebuttal of My Rebuttal- 1) Pro asked: "What you are saying is that we reap what we sow, and sow what we reap?" Yes, this is essentially a correct understanding of what I said. Humans have the freedom to choose how to live their lives, but those choices do have consequences. 2) Which leads us to the very last part of Pro's rebuttal: "if we ever go to hell it is because we did not live a godly life." According to the Bible*, this is not true. Simply living a godly life will not get you out of Hell. The Bible says "For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord"(Romans 6:23 ESV). It also says ""For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16 ESV). We see clearly from these verses that people are free to choose between life and death (traditionally 'death' is seen as hell). 3) Now, moving back to the middle of Pro's rebuttal. "What you are saying is that our Benevolent God created hell to punish sinners and non-believers..."I don't believe I ever said that. -Hell From Other Religions- This is an interesting but strange idea brought up by Pro. Here are the problems with it: 1) For this argument to work, it must be assumed that Christian beliefs are correct. If they are, then a Muslim who does not have salvation from Christ would not go to Muslim hell because Muslim hell is not a component of Christian belief. 2) Now let's make a different assumption for the sake of this argument. Somehow, this idea is what really happens. Someone who's belief system includes hell will go to this version of hell and have to be snatched away by God. What about someone who's religion does not include hell? Where would they go? Where would God snatch them from? 3) Back to assuming that Christian beliefs are correct. Pro stated "there are 1.6 Billion Muslims alone. That's a lot of snatching from." As was also stated by Pro, this is the Christian God doing the snatching. The God of Christians would have no problem snatching 1.6 billion people from anywhere. -Free Will- It seems that Pro does not understand what free will is, based on this statement: "Obviously, it is not free will if there are consequences after you question the existence of the one who gave you 'free will'. It's like saying to your kid, 'You can do anything you want to do, I give you the free will to do so, but if you later rob a bank, and scold me for not being a good parent, I will roast you in our micro-wave oven'." I would like to point out that consequences do not erase free will. If anything, consequences are on outline that makes free will more distinct. Consequences tell you exactly what exercising your free will get you, but your still free to exercise it. The kid in Pro's analogy still has the ability to choose whether or not he's going to rob a bank or question his parent even though he knows the end result of those choices. -Arguments I Should Have Made- Pro listed several arguments that I should have made back in round one. I appreciate Pro giving me ideas, but I had no need to look any farther than the base of your argument to see the flaw I needed to refute. * I realize that my opponent, and many who read this debate, may not believe in the inerrant quality of the Bible and do not believe that it should be used as a source. But, Pro's ideas of Hell and God and things like that seem to originate from the Bible (even if they've since wandered far from it), so this is why I will use the Bible as a source.