Corruption of Bible

Rebuttals - My question wasnt - "how then do you know what language the original was in fact written in?"My question is how do you know what the original look like? what we have today is the copies of copies of copies of copies of copies of the copies... and every coping has its mistakes,changing, adding, correcting,altering, cutting... and the next writer made his own mistakes like the predecessor and the next... like that it happend day after day, year after year... not even 2 of the 5000+ are the same. so how do you say that the original dont changed? even we dont have the original text of the writers - mark,luke,matthew and john - to know what changes were made. what is more problematic the earliest manuscripts have the most variations. You mentioned the word "US" in Genesis. this is not the debate about but i will reply...you looking at semetic language - Hebrow. in the Hebrow language there are 2 ways to express plurals:1 - plural of numbers2 - plural of respact this is only plural of respact, the jews dont believe in trinity and stuff. for them there is only 1 God. And yes im repeating the most things of the first round cuase you didnt answer it at all and i will repeate it again.Con - I fail to see how the authorship of the gospels pertains to the bible changing or being corrupted over time Cause if you dont know who wrote it its a HUGE problem. how do you know if they reliable? that source they used to write it? how can you trust somebody if you dont know them? About the "According to"The printers wrote "according to" becuase they trying to tell you they dont believe that these people are the authors, and the masses believe so they dont believe that this is the case. lets say you wrote a book. what will you write, According to Lord10049 OR By Lord10049?First, second, or third person?Ok have you seen one perosn here in Debate.org writing in third person? third person means hearsay. the actual person is not speaking it or writing it. why you didnt write in the third person here maybe it will be clarifying it.. for example in the bible you will find some passages God himself speaking in the first person but many many other things written in the 3person.Moses death:Con - "Moses knew he was going to die."its impossible becuase: "So Moses ... DIED (past) ... And he (God Almighty) BURIED HIM (past) (Moses) ... he was 120 years old when he DIED (past) ... And there arose not a prophet SINCE in Israel like unto Moses ..." (Deut. 34:5-10)how he can wrote such a thing? Con - Where are you getting your information from? 5000 in Greek. There are 24.000 in general latins+greek+... everybody telling you that. christains scholars or non christains.And what scholars you want? Bruce metzger ? bart d. ehrman?Con- Older does NOT mean more accurate as I have previously demonstrated.more closer to the source the information within more accurate simple reasoning. Con - but simply a contradiction within that specific translation. its not simply a translation. There are many VERSIONS AND TRANSLATIONS. protestant bible has 66 books inside. the catholic has 73 books. Ethiopian Orthodox bible has 81 books. now thats not translation its a version.by the way you prefer KJV. The New Revised Standard Version of the Bible by Oxford Press has the following to say in its preface: "Yet the King James Version has serious defects. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of biblical studies and the discovery of many biblical manuscripts more ancient than those on which the King James Version was based made it apparent that these defects were so many as to call for revision."furthermore here debate between Dr. Bart Ehrman ( New Testament scholar) & Dr. Daniel Wallace (professor of New Testament) Studies) - Is The Original New Testament Lost?