There Is No Such Thing As "Human", As It's All Subatomic Particles.

I never have issues with communication on my side, as I understand everyone to a grand level - if you cannot understand me, it's not because of how I say what I say; it's what I say - you can't fathom the knowledge I bare, so your brain is in the dark wondering what it can do to face the darkness, but like most brains, it does not look into itself, thus why you blame me for your own lack of ability to comprehend such simple explanations of the Universe, as you do not understand how to wake up your inner genius. I'm quite sure what I said is as specific as it gets. You just don't understand the specifics, so you want specifics when they are right there - you just can't see how specific it is. It's like a professional player telling you how the game is on a professional level, but what they say doesn't make any sense, so you ask them to be specific, without realizing that you're the one that lacks specificity. I have genius friends, they understand me fine because they understand this world fine - you do not understand me because you do not understand this world. This is your problem for allowing yourself to think you were free to slack on your knowledge, while I have spent my entire life learning and breaking down everything in hopes of one day that all this ignorance, negligence and arrogance will cease to the words that I speak once and for all, as I am the Universe translator. Distinction of what? We are an experience - that's it. Nothing else to it. We experience - there's this blanket of nothingness that separates us from the Universe, everything in between is where we draw onto this nothingness with our speculations and conjectures. You are either the misunderstood Universe, or the Universe - there's no "human". That's all the "human" is, misunderstood; undefined; a mystery; a question, like a cosmic chameleon of the stars. Everything that we "are", is nothing because we exist in an unfinished design as unfinished projects - we are still evolving and learning outside of our individual experience that is really the Universe experiencing itself, as we are the Universe, hence why oneness is even plausible. I ask you what is "human", you'll just refer to the same misunderstanding over and over again. You need to start accepting that there is no "human" - it's a cosmic mirage created by us wanting to own all of this, as we lack self-humility and the ability to be comfortable with watching ourselves fall apart into pieces like we should be because you can't put a puzzle together when the puzzle has not been finished yet. Our experiences and ideas are not even ours. It comes from the Universe. We just interpret our ideas and experiences poorly as we're ignorant and transient compared to the temporal spacial tapestry which encompasses us. I know consciousness through and through. Water reflects, so does consciousness. Water has proven that it can create picture and surreal worlds, as the chemicals that bathe our spinal cord and our brain create those dreams we have at night during our slumber. You do not, hence why you continue to argue pointless things I already know about. I am many steps ahead of you in ontological weaving; respect that, and start asking questions, rather than acting like you can answer over someone that has far more experience than you do. All "human" is, can only be because of the Universe. Subatomic particles can be irritated and tickled, therefore you're wrong - the Universe can feel, thus experience. Everything we do, say and think is based on the Universe's design, hence why computers, cars, planes, telephones, so on, are cross-referential to the way the Universe behaves - none of these inventions would exist; none of our emotions and feelings would exist, if the Universe did not behave this way. Get your priorities straight, because you are discussing with a genius; I broke everything down, not you. I have the answer, not you. I like how you ignored the part where I have mentioned that we are only able to observe today as we do because of the photo receptors located within our eyes, were formed billions of years ago before stars. If that's not evidence that the Universe planned human life after creates everything before it to specifically sustain human life - or more accurately, the Universe experiencing itself, then you are behind the most basic of knowledge. No, there's a reason why the wise manage to communicate with the Universe - we are the Universe. No if's, and's or buts. All inventions that stand today through the minds of geniuses, were given to these geniuses via dreams and daydreams - not the genius, themselves. An honest genius will realize that they are nothing - the brain they processed and diligently pieced together over the years is truly the only reason why they are a genius. Most of the wisest of words that people say did nit come from the person, hence why it enlightens them as much as it enlightens everyone else. Humans are multi-faceted creatures living in an multi-faceted reality. We are not computers; we contain aspects of one, just like we contain aspects of everything else. I am the water; the fire; the wind; the electricity; I am all that is. When I am angry, I am the volcano; when I cry, I am the ocean; when I sing, I am the air; when I fight, I am the fire. Everything that we "are", can only be defined by taking that and applying to the Universe's own behavior. There's nothing we can "be" - as we are "nothing and everything". You cannot define the unfinished design - the Universe and Us share this principle. We are not "human"; we are the holy trinity of fire, water and electricity throughout a system of subatomic faculties that all conglomerate so the Universe can evolve by experiencing itself. That is to say that we have no control over anything of our body - we only have control over the information that comes to us without our consent, that's it. Thus we are experiencing the Universe experiencing itself so it can evolve further - we are not experiencing our "self", as there is no "self" - there's a collective consciousness of information that does not have any relevance to our ability to make up things like owning land, owning ourselves, so on - it's like a piece of hair, we own it when it's attached; disown it when it's no longer attached. That's how it all genuinely works - you do not understand this, probably still won't understand it after this, which is why you should keep asking questions because I am the teacher here, not you.