Donald Trump and the Republicans will lose the 2020 election.

Your definition of good populism and bad populism merely comes from your own interpretation and understanding of world politics. Now I challenge you to answer this question. According to your definition of good populism and bad populism, I want to know if you consider Fidel Castro, Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn good populists or bad populists. They are politicians who display traits from both your definition of good populists and bad populists who hold liberal ideas and are supporters of science but oppose increasing globalization, attack the establishment and advocating distrust and dislike towards the upper classes. I agree with you that Hillary Clinton would continue to preserve Obama's legacy, but the EIU, the creators of the democracy index, have stated that the US would be downgraded to a flawed democracy even if she became president. There would still be a large degree of distrust directed at Hillary's administration at a level similar to Trump's. Controversy has tarnished Hillary Clinton's transparency in the past similar to the controversy surrounding Trump's administration. Moreover, during Obama's presidency, the democracy index score still fell, indicating growing distrust for the government and laying the groundwork for a demagogue like Trump to rise to power. Donald Trump is generally unpopular around the world, but this is about the United States. Foreign nationals do not decide the outcome of the US election. There are people who believe that Trump's attitude and authoritarianism should be opposed, but the reason that Trump admires authoritarian politicians strongly appeals to his supporters-that they get things done. The promises which Trump supporters eagerly waited for 16 years have not been fulfilled, which has allowed Trump to exploit the frustration of his supporters. Trump has gotten further on those promises in the first six months of his presidency than Obama and Bush have in 16 years. I suggest that you try to present arguments which are relevant to the topic. The United States has always been declining from being a world power. It is only natural that large superpowers decline and pave way for new superpowers to rise. However, this doesn't mean that the United States will collapse as a whole. Trump may cause an economic recession or depression if he wins in 2020, but that doesn't mean he won't win. Again, please try to stick to the topic. During Obama's administration, unemployment went lower, jobs increased, the economy continued to slowly chug along etc. But a Trump supporter would say that unemployment in the fossil fuel industry rose, jobs in manufacturing were slashed, the manufacturing economy dwindled, morality was defeated, we let Russia and Muslims get the better of us, the debt is rising and unnecessary pollution controls have been implemented. Trump is fighting against many of these things, and Trump's defiance against Obama's legacy only secures the support he received in 2016. It is clear that you support the Democratic Party, but many Americans don't. Republican governors control 33 of the 50 states. Democrats only have full control (majority in both houses and a affiliated governor) in eight states. The Republican Party also has a majority in both federal houses. The Republican Party has proved itself more popular than the Democratic Party, whether you like it or not. I would like to remind you that the United States is far from being a dictatorship. Trump's proposals still have to gain approval from both houses of the legislative branch. Please, check the validity of your facts before posting them. It would give you a much stronger argument.