Islam is a violent religion

Okay, I will refute your points this round. "This book is considered authentic, but that does not mean it is without fault. Any hadith in these books can still be inaccurate."Here, my opponent basically admits that part of his book could be innacurate. Thus, one cannot tell how much of the book is a fraud. As a result, my opponent concedes on the points I made about Muhammad's crimes, since he cannot refute them; he is unable to tell which parts of the book are 'legitimate'- if any- so he cannot use those against me. He, however, uses parts of the book- a book he just said can be innacurate- to break my arguments. They, however, still stand, as my sources are cited from the previous round. "The allegation of necrophilia with the aunt of Muhammad is based on one single hadith from a book that is not considered authentic by the majority of Muslim scholars. Therefore this hadith is dismissed as unreliable unless more convincing evidence is provided. (Something as disgraceful as necrophilia must have been noticed and heard by many other people in Muhammad’s time, one would think) "I did not bring up necrophilia, but it might have been in one of the sources. He does however say that other's would have noticed it, and written about it. However, as I have shown previously, Muhammad terorized all who went against him, so I doubt anyone would risk writing about his sexual exploits. "{His wives} all chose to stay married out of their free will" :"O Prophet! Say to thy consorts “If it be that ye desire the life of this world, and its glitter, – then come! I will provide for your sustenance and set you free in a handsome manner. But if ye seek God and His Apostle, and the home of the hereafter, verily God has prepared for the well-doers amongst you a great reward.” "Here the wives of the Prophet have been given the choice. They can leave him (without repercussions) and they will be well provided for (by the Prophet) or they can choose to stay with him."This, once again, cannot be proven, and even the quote he provided does not prove it. It only states that the wives would be rewarded, but isn't that qutie an incentive to stay? Unless you provide a first-hand source from his wives (I doubt they were allowed to learn to write), you concede on that point as well. Someone writing about the wives would not stop to ask for their opinions. My oppononet goes on to justify polygamy, which is quite funny. It's immoral. Somewhere in Islam mentions not to be lustful, and if men are getting women for pleasure, as my opponent stated, that is lust. Bad muslim. Lastly, my opponent concedes on another point when he says: “Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help." This passage once again uses their god, allah, and claims that followers must punish non-believers, and so will their god.”The Quran is the word of God (hence often the phrase “Say: …” because Muhammad is being commanded to convey a message, the Quran does not contain Muhammad’s own words according to Muslim belief). God is saying he will punish them Himself. Nobody else is being told to kill disbelievers." Here, he admits that his own god will punish non-believers. That is violence. If the own god of islam is saying that he will punish people, the religion is violent. Your own god states it! I rest my case. Islam is a religion of violence. I await my opponents response. Thanks.