Existence of God

This response is made of 3 parts to address your argument. Part 1: Introduction of arguments Lets start off with a few questions: 1) Have you actually read through the bible? 2) Do you understand that there is a difference between the New and Old testaments? 3) The most Successful societies is from a Christian or religious group. Why would you think that a "fairy tale religion" has existed for 2 thousand years. 4) Do you or not believe in a God and any other intelligent designer? When analyzing your first argument I see that you think that the bible has no original version and has no historical context. For this argument to continue, I must first present my evidence for the need for an existence of a (any type of) God. Reasons: The unmoved mover (Aristotle): "It is clear then that there is neither place, Nor void, Nor time, Outside the heaven. Hence whatever is there, Is of such a nature as not to occupy any place, Nor does time age it; nor is there any change in any of the things which lie beyond the outermost motion; they continue through their entire duration unalterable and unmodified, Living the best and most self sufficient of lives" From [the fulfillment of the whole heaven] derive the being and life which other things, Some more or less articulately but other feebly, Enjoy. " The universe started at one point in time. Without a God, Say not a Christian God, But a general creator, There would be no set time of the start of the universe. Since there must be potentiality for actuality to exist, An atheist cannot prove that anything other than a intelligent designer for the creation of the universe. The next argument is that if you do not believe in a God, You must say that all human actions are for the benefit of the individual self. You must prove that we are an accident of different particles floating around. We must say that the unbelievable practically 0% chance of the right chemical reactions creating life. Say that we were ~1 inches closer to the sun, Living creatures on earth would cease to exist. Scientist have proven early earth climates may have been able to create building blocks of life yet cannot prove that it could have created life. Part 2: Textual context and the Bible in general. The bible is a combination of thousands of years of experiences. Your argument that it is 2000 years old, Thus irrelevant is completely outrageous. When you look at the bible, In terms of it's development, And relevance today, Most of our laws are based on the biblical laws. For you to understand the contextual relevance of the bible, You must understand the difference between the new testament and old testament. And nice job ctrl+v freedom from religion foundation. Here is a logical response http://www. Bcbsr. Com/topics/ans5. Html. You are taking most of this completely out of context. You argue that the bible is historically wrong and has 0 percent accuracy. For the new testament here is a testament from a Roman senator, A historically proven figure. https://www. Biblicalarchaeology. Org/daily/people-cultures-in-the-bible/jesus-historical-jesus/did-jesus-exist/ From a different source look at Historian Flavius Josephus. He is a non-biblical, Non religious historian writing about Jesus. He talks about how people talked about some miracles described in the bible. "there's more evidence that Jesus lived than Julius Caesar, Yet no one doubts Caesar existed. " Here is another quote from a credible source : "McDowell explained another understanding among scholars. "The closer the manuscript to the original, The less chance of error or miscopy, " he said. Current surviving Bible manuscripts get closer to the original work than any other manuscripts from the ancient world. " So you claims are completely unfounded in your comment that the bible is completely inaccurate. Part 3 : Form of communication What 4 things exist forever? (physically) 1) Art 2) Music 3) Speech 4) Writing The fact that the bible exists two thousands years later means that it worked. I don't understand your point. You don't need a miracle to communicate. I don't think art music or speech would be efficient. So writing is just a choice. So before you speak about how my God is unfounded, Think about your own world-view. Are you a mistake? Are you just a variable in the universe that got lucky? Whats your purpose in life? How would you disprove an existence of God when its the only logical possibility, Versions aside. You picked on one small part of the argument.