BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Funnier Jokes Wins.

I saw this somewhere and thought it would be fun. 1 joke per round it doesn't matter how long or short. Dear Child, I am writing this slow because I know that you can't read fast. We don't live where we did when you left home. Your dad read in the paper that most accidents happen within 20 miles from your home so we moved. I won't be able to send you the address, as the last family that lived here took the house numbers when they left so that they wouldn't have to change their address. This place is real nice. It even has a washing machine. I'm not sure if it works too well though. Last week I put a load in, pulled the chain, and haven't seen them since. The weather isn't too bad here., it only rained twice last week, The first time it rained for three days and the second time for four days. The coat you wanted me to send you, your Uncle Steve said it would be a little too heavy to send in the mail with the buttons on, so we cut them off and put them in the pockets. We got another bill from the funeral home. They said if we don't make the last payment on Grandma's grave, up she comes. John locked his keys in the car yesterday. We were worried because it took him two hours to get me and Shelby out. Your sister had a baby this morning but I haven't found out what it is yet, so I don't know if you're an aunt or an uncle. If the baby is a girl, your sister is going to name it after me, she's going to call it Mom. Uncle Pete fell in a whiskey vat last week. Some man tried to pull him out but he fought them off and drowned. We had him cremated and he burned for three days. Three of your friends went off a bridge in a pick-up truck. Ralph was driving. He rolled down the window and swam to safety. Your two friends were in the back. They drowned because they couldn't get the tailgate down. There isn't much more news at this time. Nothing much has happened. PS, I was going to send you some money but the envelope was already sealed.
Funnier Jokes Wins.

Bob was in trouble. He forgot his wedding anniversary. His wife was really pissed. She told him "Tomorrow morning, I expect to find a gift in the driveway that goes from 0 to 200 in 6 seconds AND IT BETTER BE THERE !!" The next morning he got up early and left for work. When his wife woke up, she looked out the window and sure enough there was a box gift-wrapped in the middle of the driveway. Confused, the wife put on her robe and ran out to the driveway, brought the box back in the house. She opened it and found a brand new bathroom scale. Bob has been missing since Friday.
Funnier Jokes Wins.

An old man goes to the doctor for his yearly physical, his wife tagging along. When the doctor enters the examination room, he tells the old man, "I need a urine sample, a stool sample and a sperm sample." The old man, being hard of hearing, looks at his wife and yells: "WHAT?" "What did he say? What's he want?" His wife yells back, "He needs your underwear."
Funnier Jokes Wins.

A lawyer married a woman who had previously divorced ten husbands. On their wedding night, she told her new husband, "Please be gentle, I'm still a virgin." "What?" said the puzzled groom. "How can that be if you've been married ten times?" "Well, Husband #1 was a sales representative: he kept telling me how great it was going to be. Husband #2 was in software services: he was never really sure how it was supposed to function, but he said he'd look into it and get back to me. Husband #3 was from field services: he said everything checked out diagnostically but he just couldn't get the system up. Husband #4 was in telemarketing: even though he knew he had the order, he didn't know when he would be able to deliver. Husband #5 was an engineer: he understood the basic process but wanted three years to research, implement, and design a new state-of-the-art method. Husband #6 was from finance and administration: he thought he knew how, but he wasn't sure whether it was his job or not. Husband #7 was in marketing: although he had a nice product, he was never sure how to position it. Husband #8 was a psychologist: all he ever did was talk about it. Husband #9 was a gynecologist: all he did was look at it. Husband #10 was a stamp collector: all he ever did was... God! I miss him! But now that I've married you, I'm really excited!" "Good," said the new husband, "but, why?" "You're a lawyer. This time I know I'm gonna get screwed!"
White privilege is impossible and doesn't exist

+++Rebuttal+++'According to this rich only means one thing:rich : having a lot of money and possessions'Yes that's exactly what I'm saying in relation to others in the society. For example. we would not count a caveman who had two pigs as being rich, but back then he would have been extremely wealthy. My opponent drops this argument.Adam's argument (as far as I can actually understand it)Segregation != poverty (yes)Most white people are commoners (yes)???????????(I have no idea how Pro gets to these assumptions)'Racism has nothing to do with class.' (There's no proof for this statement)Classism had nothing to do with racism ever(again, no proof)'Racism is in fact a tribal thing. White privilege doesn't exist.'(yet another baseless statement)More arguments to follow next round.<3
White privilege is impossible and doesn't exist

There seems to be a misunderstanding over the word 'rich', so I'm here to clear that up.This argument suggests that rich is perhaps on the level of a Gates or Buffet, yet in reality rich is simply a comparative term. This means that IN RELATION to the black and hispanic community of the USA (say) those who are caucasian tend to be financially much better off.According to this rich only means one thing: rich : having a lot of money and possessions http://www.merriam-webster.com...Also, another argument that shows that racism and classism have nothing to do with each other is thishttp://www.dailymail.co.uk...Appalachia, not Bed-Stuy, Sunset Park, or Compton, is the poorest part of America.Poverty doesn't equate to a dangeorus neighborhood. Factors such as crime, lack of father figure, corruption, urban decay lead to this.http://articles.sun-sentinel.com...http://www.dailymail.co.uk...Segregation doesn't cause poverty. Spanish and black neighborhoods were some of the most superior neighborhoods during segregation. Blacks and Spanish built their own schools.Most white people are commoners, just like people of every other race. Racism has nothing to do with class. During Jim Crow, most Southerners were commoners who didn't like other races. Classism had nothing to do with racism ever. White privilege implies that rich people are responsible for racism. Dead wrong. In fact, the most common racism came from populists in the USA.https://www.google.com...Racism is in fact a tribal thing. White privilege doesn't exist.Does white favoritism (favoring of whites over other races in things like legal protection, rights, etc) exist? Yes. But not white privilege. IT just is impossible
White privilege is impossible and doesn't exist

There seems to be a misunderstanding over the word 'rich', so I'm here to clear that up. This argument suggests that rich is perhaps on the level of a Gates or Buffet, yet in reality rich is simply a comparative term. This means that IN RELATION to the black and hispanic community of the USA (say) those who are caucasian tend to be financially much better off. Quick graph to show this [1]. Pro's argument therefore collapses as those who are Caucasian do indeed tend to be much 'richer' than those who are black and therefore according to his own (questionable) logic, white privilege is not impossible and can indeed exist. <3 1.)http://tinyurl.com...
White privilege is impossible and doesn't exist

I will argue that racism and priivlege are also two different things. "Privilege" is defined as "the advantage that wealthy and powerful people have over other people in a society"http://www.merriam-webster.com...Most white people are not wealthy. Most are commoners. Now a lot are "Friends"-watching racists, but racism is a tribal thing, not a matter of class. Priivlege deals with classism. The only people with true privilege are monarchs, and ceelbrities, and many of the corrupt leaders across the world. There is no way that race and priivlege can mix.White privilege is nonsense. It implies that all white people are rich. This is not an emotional argument. But one of semantics. It is complete nonsense.
Gay Marriage should be Legalized

gay marriage is something that should be legalized. you cannot put a barrier infront of someone who wishes to marry their same sex partner. gay marriage is just 2 same sex people who wish to spend their lives together. they have been prohibited for many centuries but this is the 21st century so we must not live on old beliefs. many say it is the act of the devil while it is only the mere act of love for another. it is wrong for people to try and control another's life. it is a discrimination to humans and destroys equality in life.
#ChangeTheDate Australia day should be changed from the 26th of January to another date.

Conflicts do occur on Australia Day, but these conflict occur because we are not on the right page with each other. The date is one thing, but our relationship with each other by how we talk and our actions is another thing that needs to be resolved urgently. What is the point in changing the date when we can become a stronger and more united country that is free to talk to anyone without creating an argument? As I said in the previous arguments, changing the date would not fix matters that affect many Australians. I also stated that it is Australia Day is a great way to expose the survival and bravery of Indigenous Australians as they welcomed newcomers into their land, though ending up getting ambushed. It is great to be reminded that Australia Day is great for celebrating our culture and remembering the generations of brave Indigenous Australians who came before us.
#ChangeTheDate Australia day should be changed from the 26th of January to another date.

Whilst Jada has stated that changing the date will not help change anything, I strongly disagree against that statement. The date that is currently Australia Day , was not a day of celebration for the Indigenous Australian culture as stated in the first argument. The Aborigines will appreciate a change in date, as it will also change the meaning. She also mentioned Survival day being used to describe the "celebration". The Aboriginal culture should not have to refer to Australia Day, with such sadness and yet still some pride, as Survival day, but as a day of being recognised as apart of a United Australia. It is clear through the points stated above, why the date of Australia Day must be changed. The current date of January the 26th is not currently a united celebration, and a step towards everyone acknowledging the history and identity of Australia is by changing the date to an event, which shows unification and proper acknowledgment of Indigenous Australians. " 85 per cent of people believe Australia Day is a day for celebration" according to the Herald Sun. What about the other 15% of people apart of our nation? From the source http://www.creativespirits.info... Indigenous Australians refer to Australia Day as Invasion day, when they are reminded of the " Loss of their sovereign rights to their land, loss of family and the loss of the right to practice their culture". They should not have to feel that way on Australia Day. It is so understandable why they would be protesting against the current date and why they will continue to fight for it. Changing the date from the 26th of January to a more appropriate date resembling unification will bring more peace to the Indigenous Australians on Australia Day. If politicians and leaders of our country continue to refuse to change the date, the violence will continue to occur on the 26th of January, Australia Day, every year. Which is why that is only logical to have the date changed.
#ChangeTheDate Australia day should be changed from the 26th of January to another date.

If Australia Day was to be changed, yes it would definitely stop the sadness from the Aboriginals but what about the others? We as a community have to realise that Australia also has people outside of the Indigenous circle. More damage could be created from a small disaster which could lead to a war against a split up Australia. This potential "war" could create another stolen generation but only larger and more open to race and negative encounters this time. Questions that also have to be considered are will the change in date of Australia Day stop anything other than the mourn and separation of Australia? Changing the date would not fix matters such as mental and physical abuse as they will still be confronted. As well as rape, homelessness, discrimination, racism and law breaking acts. My question to you is why change the date now, when there are repercussions to consider?
#ChangeTheDate Australia day should be changed from the 26th of January to another date.

I acknowledge how my opposition is keeping in mind those that refer to it as survival day, but it is not clear why that should happen, as it can be quite offensive to the indigenous culture. It sounds like you"re implying that the Aborigines should be grateful for their survival, grateful for the amount of slaughters that occurred and that they are still alive. It was from that date onwards that the Indigenous Australians experienced torture and pain. There are many more reasons why Australia day"s date needs to be changed, but obvious reasons why, is to end the conflict and protests against this ongoing debate. This date needs to be changed to a more historically meaningful event, one with a message of uniting and embracing everyone's differences. If the date is changed it will end the protesting and violence that occurs during this time of the year. Julia Gillard was "trapped by furious aboriginal protesters" on the 26th of January 2012, according to "Day of shame shows why we must end this racial charade" by Andrew Bolt (Herald Sun). This event and many others could have been avoided if the leaders of country realise the change that needs to be made. According to http://indigenousx.com.au... , protests have been happening regarding the inappropriate date of Australia Day since 1938. If they keep delaying the changing of Australia day"s date, then this protesting and conflict will continue to rage on. The clear solution is to change Australia Day from January the 26th to another more appropriate date.
#ChangeTheDate Australia day should be changed from the 26th of January to another date.

Though it is true what my opposition has said about how changing the date of Australia Day will strengthen our knowledge and make the now Australia Day but I highly disagree as Australia Day has many events that should be celebrated. more historical event but It is great to celebrate the past event our past ancestors did was not right and justice should be given but non aboriginal Australians have done the best they have to say sorry. This historicals Significant to a majority Though it is true that Australia day is often referred to as "Invasion Day" and a day of hurt and heartache, it celebrates the survival of one of the oldest cultures on Earth. Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders have the right to mourn about the past and how it has affected our present world but they should also think about the positive impacts of Australia Day being on the 26th of January. This leads me to the main point of my argument, Australia Day should be considered as survival day for Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders as it was the day to the start of the negative impacts that surrounded Australia after the first fleet. The past experience of massacre years of when Australia was declared "Terra Nullius" to our present day has wisely influenced Australian about the wisdom, courage and strength that the Indigenous Australians stood for. It is believed that Australia Day is a great way to expose this as it was a start for many brave Indigenous Australians to welcome newcomers into their society. Nowadays, it is great to be reminded that Australia Day is great for celebrating parts of our culture and remembering the generations of Australians who have come before us.
#ChangeTheDate Australia day should be changed from the 26th of January to another date.

Australia Day is a date looked forward to by many all over the country. It"s associated with happiness, celebration and a day of pride by some, but what about the others apart of this nation? For the Indigenous Australians who have been known to walk on Australian soil for the last 40,000 + years, this day doesn"t mark a day of joy, commemoration or gratification. This day does not have the same meaning for every Australian citizen, as it should. It marks a day of loss, slaughter, dispossession, and ill treatment to the Indigenous Australian race from 1788 when the First Fleet arrived in Australia on January the 26th. The direct historical event this "jollification" is linked to is not something for all to be proud of. It is clear to see why Aborigines to this day and age are still protesting against the current date of Australia Day. As stated in the article by Martin Flanagan "The Problem with Australia Day", this day of recognising Australia as a united nation and that "supposedly exists to bring us together, serves each year to drive us apart". This exact date is the "worst date" possible for the day once referred to as First Landing day or Foundation day. It doesn"t resonate a clear day of celebration or unification, but accentuates the bad choices and cruelty of the British who first landed and who "invaded" the land once lived on peacefully by the Aborigines. Changing the date of Australia Day is clearly a priority, as it"s current date does not properly or respectively unite Australians, Indigenous or non-Indigenous.
Report details sexual abuse by more than 300 priests in Pennsylvania's Catholic Church

First of all the evidence of their being no God is on you. You cannot prove God doesn"t exist. However, Through laws of logic, Uniformity of nature and absolute morality we can see that it is only with a God these things can be possible. As for galaxies only being spiral that is not true there are also elliptical and irregular. As Christians we don"t know everything about the universe, But We can say that the uniformity of nature will be found in the whole universe and uniformity of nature shows there is a God. In all you verses God is punishing evil with destruction. The Israelites were sacrificing their children and Breaking all kinds of His laws that they had agreed to obey. God is punishing a nation who had agreed to follow His law, But they have turned away and disobeyed Him. If you have a problem with Him being unjust it is up to you to prove it. These problems of verses that you mention is not God"s fault but mans. God never makes mistakes, But man does. However, The Bible has no spiritual contradictions. The way to find the correct Bible is a long study which you could find on the internet, But I will not discuss it because It would take a lot of words and you are not interested. One of the problems you are going to @257;nd when you examine atheism (or any non-biblical worldview) from a rational perspective is that there is no foundation for making any moral claims whatsoever. That is, As a non-Christian, You cannot rationally claim that anything is an atrocity, Or that anyone has ever done anything wrong. You can certainly say that the biblical God has done things that displease you, But the concepts of "right" and "wrong" are meaningless in an atheistic universe because there can be no objective universal standard " only personal, Subjective opinions. You still have not been able to give a logical case against God. God did not kill billions on battlefields. The only people He waged war against was the thousands of Canaanites. If the you really want to show concern for murder, You could start with all those murdered by atheistic/evolutionary regimes: 77 million in Communist China, 62 million in the Soviet Gulag State, 21 million non-battle killings by the Nazis, 2 million murdered in the Khmer Rouge killing fields. Also, The millions of could be children through abortion. Apparently, You are not interested in knowing what Christians believe or what the Bible says where evil came from. If you do I suggest you read my argument above closely about evil and tell me where you disagree.
Report details sexual abuse by more than 300 priests in Pennsylvania's Catholic Church

People like you are really pathetic. 1. You cannot even prove that your god even exists. 2. Since you believe in your god, You believe that your god knowingly created these monsters to do unto these children what they have done otherwise your god is not a god and the priests that have committed these evils have more power than this god of yours to have committed these evils to begin with. And it simply means that your god is not in control of everything, That your god is not in charge of everything and that these priests are - as so is every other evildoer, Also that your god is not all knowing and most certainly is not all powerful, And most certainly does not give a crap at all and loves to watch suffering especially among children - but you have not read your bible at all in which clearly shows in which your god would never use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication the begin with to not know that your god truly hates children oh yeah - would you like those verses? And it also means that your god is not in any way omnipotent. And it means that your god is most certainly not is any way perfect. Simple. Did you even bother taking the time to think things through? So what is left is that you claim to be a christian. However there is no such a thing as being a christian. You in no possible way follow your christ. Neither does anyone else except for possibly 1, 000 people on this planet. Oh and oh yeah, You cannot even prove that your christ has ever existed also. All you have is your bible. That's not proof of anything. That why these cowardly priests could get away with anything as they could easily hide behind YOUR shield of religion. 3. And how dare you invent an excuse for your catholic church when you know 0% of nothing about it. There's at least 25, 000 denominations of christianity alone! So how can there be any consensuses whatsoever? Certainly not by you.
Report details sexual abuse by more than 300 priests in Pennsylvania's Catholic Church

This is a horrible thing that has happened. Obviously you are anti-religion because of this happening. I am a Christian and the reason why this is happening is because the Catholic Church does not stand with Christ. God does not approve of the Catholic Church for they have corrupted His Word. The Catholic Church is not the Church of God and the pope is not directly from Peter. The Catholic Church is also not the oldest Christian religion.