Schools Should Be Required to Teach Basic Investing Skills and Finance

Round 02 Argument Re-compilationFrameworkWell, round 02 had been opted for the main argumentative speech. Unfortunately, due to some technical problems, although I presented a noteworthy argument, it was cut down to what it is now. I am extremely sorry for that. And since the contender has let me do this one more time, I am going to present the unfinished arguments of round 02.YardstickMy burden of proof on the current position is to show that families should play a more important role rather than schools in teaching these basic real life knowledge. See these in the next section, Constructives. Another thing to be notified is that this debate is not only about the Americans, but you are confining it to that little barrier. Now as your motion suggests, do it that way, that is talking in the world perspective.Constructives01. Further enhanced horizon:Well, the fact here is that if we want to get a clearer concept of this debated topic, we just cannot be confined to economics only. We also need to expand our thinking horizon to some less supposed important thing like socialization or culture. What is actually a family and what does it usually do? To say in brief, it is the nuclear bondage of all sorts of social and cultural affairs or relationships of a society. This definition itself is saying that there cannot be any better teaching or learning institution rather than family. In your family, you will get some members or relatives who are vastly experienced in this aspect. And more to that, you may also say that there are even more experienced ones in schools or colleges. But you should keep it in your mind that the family members will be inclined to teach you these things more cordially than anybody. And that's the point I want to emphasize. You may go here http://www.payh.org...;.02. Vastness of domain of a school:Furthermore, in your school, you are not the only student going to school to have knowledge. There are yet many students. So, your teacher cannot teach you these things with that much patience and attention which your family members could do. And if you think about the densely merged schools, the situation is hilarious. Then and there, family is the only option. So, in this context too, family is the superior one and it should be, no doubt with that. The number of pupils and schools in England is published as part of the annual statistical first release ‘Schools, pupils and their characteristics’ [ https://www.gov.uk... ]. In January 2012, there were 8.2 million pupils attending 24,372 schools in England. The number of teachers in schools in England is published as part of the annual statistical first release ‘School workforce in England’ [ https://www.gov.uk...]. The latest data is for November 2011. In November 2011, there were 438,000 teachers in state-funded schools in England on a full-time equivalent basis. In response to the questions relating to education policy, the structure of the department and school funding. How would you deal with these large number of students and less number of teachers in the schools? https://www.gov.uk...;.03. Pressurous situation in a school: Come to the next point, load of students in a school. In the schools, we usually go to learn the traditional things and topics like physics, chemistry or biology. Whenever you are dealing with these critical ones in your school, it is absolutely a burden for you as well as your school with those subjects. Because, you know they are practical life related and they should be taught in nowhere but family. If school has to do everything, then where are the duties and responsibilities of your family upon you? 04. Having friend circle- maybe good, maybe bad!!!:In your school, you have friend circle around you. So, when you are being taught about the process about handling money, some rare ones of those friends may divert you to a path where you are not supposed to go. As a result, instead of having the proper knowledge, you may gain something negative which is not expected whatsoever. In lieu of this, if you deal it with your family, there are your parents and brothers who will never give you something negative like that, even by mistake. This is the ultimate difference between the role of a school and a family. 05. Developing/Underdeveloped countries' contextual matters:Now, it seems that you are pretty much hopeful with the fact that the schools will always be able to render such knowledge to the students. Now what about the underdeveloping densely populated countries? There are many many regions in those areas where electricity has not even reached, let alone schools, collees or universities. Whenever you or I am thinking about these countries, you have to agree onthe fact that they have to be educated in these sectors by their respective families.06. Families being inexperienced:Now, there comes the last frontier, families do not have much knowledge about these subjects. Yeah, I also agree with you. In these cases, school is the only option for the learners to choose. However, the number of these types of families is not too great, In fact, they are the minority. And we should not consider a thing from a minor or exceptional viewpoint, should we? Think about the majority and they have sufficient knowledge on these to render and they can do it quite easily. After all, poor or rich, everybody has little or more basics about economic condition. Hopefully, you have got the fact.Hopefully, you have got the point why and how this motion should be invalid. With that being said, thanks once again, looking forward to your arguments.................................. THE RESOLUTION MUST BE NEGATED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!