Biologival evolution is observable

First off would like to make a correction to the debate title its meant to be 'Biological'. Secondly I will have to correct my opponent. //My opponent is not explicit as to what phase of biological evolution is he referring to. There are two phases in the inevitable process of biological evolution according to evolutionary scientists and these are the microevolution and macroevolution. // Sadly you don't realize both phases are changes in gene frequencies the only difference is the amount of generations until its macro evolution. SOURCE http://evolution.berkeley.edu... http://biology.about.com... http://www.thefreedictionary.com... No nothing to do with religion but education, evident to the debate being categorized as Education I am not sure if my opponent is getting information from. The debate is about evolution be observable evident to the title Opponent is wrong again if you mean Human Senses as in the system that consists of a group of sensory cell types that responds to a specific physical phenomenon, and that corresponds to a particular group of regions within the sapiens brain where the signals are received and interpreted. Well you incorrect once more that is why we have science cause we can't rely on our senses we need other sources of senses to back up our claims this is why we can now see infrared light, x ray, radiation and sonar. Science can a prove and disprove claims. Macroevolution is evolution on a bigger scale http://evolution.berkeley.edu... Domestication is a good example of macro evolution. //On the other hand, the super natural explanation of creation fits every scientific data we now have.// Don't just state it please explain which super natural explanation of creation cause there are thousands out there and which scientific data, stop being so broad narrow it down show the evidence not just claim. Look up Lenski's E coli experiment you will find the E coli evolved a new gene. Most Dogs can't have fertile offspring with Gray Wolves which are the common ancestor for dogs. http://genome.cshlp.org... if you want more source for the dogs give me a shout. The variation between dog breeds is much greater than the variation between human populations (27.5% versus 5.4%). Conversely, the degree of genetic homogeneity is much greater within individual dog breeds than within distinct human populations (94.6% versus 72.5%). Structure analysis of 85 dog breeds. Cluster results from a structure analysis of 414 dogs from 69 breeds and based on 96 microsatellite markers. Each breed was usually represented by five dogs, and all dogs were unrelated to one another at the grandparent level. New Chromosome Life probably started with no chromosomes early replicators would have been grab bags of metabolites, proteins, and RNA that would have simply sloppily split in two, with no real sorting. DNA and chromosomes evolved as accounting and archiving tools: they were a way to guarantee that each daughter cell in a division reliably received a copy of every gene. Also, most living things now just have one "chromosome", a loop of DNA, and perhaps a small cloud of DNA fragments. This also relates more to another theory as the theory of evolution is about changes in gene frequencies not the origins of life. SCIENCE The intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. The only system of thought without faith. Evolution is observable in the world today and the past.