God probably prefers bugs to people

I predict Con will not defend themselves on any of the following false accusations, sloppy methodology and errors in basic logic, and they'll probably justify it with some tough-guy John Wayne talk like "Yr not even worth the trouble, bug-lover!" Prove me wrong, Con. Show I'm no Nostradamus: 1. Con says, "I explained that we are talking about the bug community as a whole and not one species" - No Con didn't. My arguments implied it. However, I was pointing out in my rubettals that Con's argument could also be used to prove my point of God's love for bugs over people. 2. Con says, "I am arguing that BUG AS A WHOLE AND NOT A SPECIES ARE LESS IMPORTANT TO GOD THAN HUMANS" Con isn't arguing my actual position. He's arguing against the validity of my reasons. As I said, "God prefers bugs like katy-dids (INDIVIDUALS), bacteria (INDIVIDUALS), parameciums (INDIVIDUALS), earth worms (INDIVIDUALS), etc." I nowhere said "BUGS as a WHOLE". 3. Con says, "it makes it difficult to take you serious because you are acting childish". This is the ad hominem fallacy. And besides, all those things he quoted were typos. 4. Con says, "WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT MEASLES". Did Con not read when I defined bugs as "the a colloquial term for disgusting vermin beneath the order of rats, lizards and birds". Has Con never heard about getting sick with a "bug" --- referring not to an insect but to a virus or bacteria? C'mon Con. Learn to read things properly. It will do you a world of good. 5. Con says, "You are saying that we can kill the dog because it could be allergic and get sick." Its a well known fact human products are tested on animals and, afterwards, the animals are sent to heaven. 6. Con says, "He would not want his hard work to go to waste so he would keep it." This is a valid point and I applaud Con's intellectual dexterity in this regard. Well done Con, well done. 7. Con says, "I will admit that ants store food but not all bugs store food as well as humans. I am talking in the larger sense that the majority of bugs do not store food as well as humans store food in pantries." Again, you may be talking about bugs in the larger sense, but I am speaking of bugs in the specific sense, which is subsumed under the larger sense. There's a difference. It's like, you enjoy a box of candybars not because you eat them all at once, but because each individual candy bar is delicious. You simply appreciate the entire box because of the flavor of each individual candybar. Thus God loves each individual bug more than people, and loves bugs as a whole more than people on that same account. 8. Con says, "WHY BACTERIA IS A NOT A BUG". What is a flu bug? Its a virus. What is a stomach bug? Its bacteria. Anyway, I specifically identified bacteria and parameciums as BUGS in my prefatory remarks. Anyway, Con is acting childish and its hard to take him seriously when he or she doesn't argue my actual points, refuses to accept the stated definitions of the debate, and criticizes me for typos (as if that was even relevphant). 9. Con says, "When we find a vaccine for ebola, we will go back on top of the food chain." We won't find a vaccine. Wash your hands. Stay in doors. 10. Con says, "However, we have been on the top of the food chain longer than Ebola in the last 2000 years, but as of right now we are losing." We weren't on top of the foodchain during Spanish flu epidemic, the plague, AIDS RIGHT NOW etc. 11. Con says, "God gave us made humans. Humans made technology. God indirectly made technology." According to this reasoning, God made humans. Humans made the Mongol invasions, the Holocaust, Armenian genocide, Holomador, genocides of North, Meso and South America, etc. Ergo, God indirectly made these genocides. God loves bugs more than people, clearly. 12. Con says, "We can go on a run." Meh. 13. Con says, " You are making random comparisons". I submit to the Con that something is not necessarily random because it goes over your head. 14. Con says, "You even compared bug and humans to euthanizing puppies with make up." Yep. Anyway, I think Con for a splendid debate. I still maintain that God prefers measles to people, and that God euthanisizes us like labradors with eye-liner. So far, my arguments are clearly true, sound, logical, and these beliefs should be placed in an amendment to the U.S. Constitution forthwith.