If God created this world he's an idiot

I just saw a debate like this and wanted to debate this myself. Definitions: God: The Judeo-Christian God. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Create: make something: to bring something into existence ~~~~~~~~~~~~ World: planet Earth: the planet Earth Earth and everything on it: the Earth, including all of its inhabitants and the things upon it ~~~~~~~~~~~~ human race: all of the human inhabitants of Earth ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Idiot: a dolt, or dullard or one that is mentally deficient, one that acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rules: Usual debate rules. Like courtesy and no personal attacks. R1 is for acceptance. R2 is for arguments. R3 is for rebuttals and conclusion. *No devil's advocates. *No appealing to mysteries. I would like to thank Con in advance, and good luck. In this debate I am making the claim: 'If God created this world he's an idiot' Am I really arguing that God is an idiot? No. What I am actually arguing is that God does not have anything to do with the creation of this world. So in effect I am arguing that God is not an idiot. I will attempt to do this by using "the law of non-contradiction' and the "like from like" principle. The"like from like' principle states that it is impossible for an entity to create unlike itself. (It is important to remember that this principle is always referring to content and never form.) Let's take a look at the main content or attribute of God that pertains to my argument. Perfect: "Perfect" is often said to be a subjective concept. However, when "perfect" is used to describe God it needs to have a clear definition. A definition that is explicit. A definition that cannot be interpreted into something it is not. I don't want this debate to turn into a debate of definitions and subjectivity. To keep this debate on track I'll define 'perfect' as: unchanging, indestructible, eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, -"perfect"- will include all of this. Therefore, anything that changes, can be destroyed, is subjected to the effects of time or contradicts any of the qualities that has been equated with "perfect" will be considered to be imperfection. I'm sure my opponent will agree. God is also attributed to creating this world. This to me is a problem, it doesn't logically follow that a perfect God would create a world with obvious imperfections. A world that is completely ungodly. There is nothing in this world that reflects the attributes of a "perfect" God. This world is a dynamic and ever changing place. Everything here is capable of being destroyed and is subject to the effects of time. If God is perfect then by definition anything it creates would have to be perfect and not separate. My opponent may argue that there is no reason why perfection must logically be passed down through creation. or A perfect God cannot be limited to only create perfection. or God could have created imperfection of its own volition. or other variations of the same thing. I would ask why would God created unlike itself? This question must have a logical answer. I would answer this question with 'it wouldn't'. Let me explain: A being or entity that is perfect as defined would not will to create anything that was unlike itself. I would say that the will of a perfect God would be in accordance with its own *identity. It would not be possible for a perfect entity to extend its will in a way that the given extension would be contrary to its own identity. (by law of non-contradiction) *identity and likeness are synonymous I am merely asserting that if there is a God, it is not an idiot. But if there is a God and it created unlike itself, it most certainly is an idiot. Here are some examples of the"like from like" principle: When a person creates a work of art or an invention that piece of work contains their likeness or identity; their feelings, emotions, necessities, thoughts and many other aspects of who they are, this cannot be denied. A part of their identity can definitely be found in their creation. In fact, It would be an impossibility for an artist or inventor to create something that does not contain a part of their identity. An artist and their work are intimately connected. Therefore, what is created shares aspects with its creator. It must have been created for a reason, to serve a purpose. We can look to the natural world and see this principle in effect. When a bird creates a nest, its nest is specifically designed for that bird. Its identity or likeness is reflected in its nest. In fact, one could determined a birds identity just by looking at its nest. Examples of this principle can be found all through out nature. However, humans and animals are mortal things. Therefore, whatever we create or should I say make follows in the footsteps of our mortality. Even if it out lives us, it is always vulnerable and subject to the effects of time, and will one day be no more.This is the principle of 'like from like'. to summarize: A being cannot create unlike itself by law of non-contradiction. The likeness of this being has been endowed with "Perfection". (as defined above) It would be impossible for a perfect being to create unlike itself and not be an idiot. I have also applied the principle of "like from like", which simply says that which is created always expresses the likeness of its creator. I have illustrated how this principle can be observed with people and the natural world. I have also stated that "likeness" and "identity" are synonymous, and explained the connection between "will" and 'identity" that the will to create is an extension of ones identity, and how the likeness of a being can be found in it creations. This debate topic can also be applied to people and the natural world. It would be idiotic for anyone or anything to create unlike itself or to create contrary to its own identity, it would be irrational, self destructive and counter productive.