God can exist even though there is suffering

Friends, Brothers, Comrades I must say that these pathetic Ad hominem is a signal to a lost debate on his part. When he may only question myself personally for spelling, it means he has nothing to fall back on upon having this debate! Perhaps I have not made my position clear: IF we look at religion and it's writings (in this case Christianity and the Bible) and agree by implication that God's words are in those handed down by Moses (for example) then it's pain and suffering it has caused the world indirectly disproves God's existence .. thus meaning in a WORLD OF SUFFERING there is NO GOD. Clear? When you say 'God can EXIST in a suffering world' Your debating the existence of God and his effects as a result. There is NO assumption here otherwise I've already lost and I would have agreed with you (I am con therefore I say no .. opposite to you .. do you understand kind sir?) Why the bible as an attack? Isn't that odd? Well because Kent believes in the Christian God and believes (by implication) that the Bible is in fact the Word of God, it's hypocritical stories will be used by me to indirectly disprove HIS god. His problem is he specified; I say again comrades! He must prove that 1) Jesus existed in a world that suffers 2) That God CAN in fact exist and 3) that every other religion is wrong. Something he will spend a life time trying to do. That is his fault not mine, as I am an agnostic atheist. Furthermore, he has NOT even decided to pull out the cosmological argument or the ontological argument both of which can very easily be refuted. (Yes Kent, I HAVE read St Thomas Aquinas) Now can we agree that God is all knowing? All seeing? If we can, then all knowing does not make sense. As again the homosexuality argument. He would not have created them only to disapprove of them. Furthermore in the story of the likes of Adam and Eve it appears that Satan is more good than evil. If we were to objectively measure the bible by utilitarianism as an ethic (thus it is good if it serves the greatest good for the greatest number of people) then the bible has failed upon many parts. It is against the bible for interracial marriage, it demands the death for women whom engage in sexual acts before marriage. How is this good for the greatest number of people? "Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you." - Deuteronomy 22:21 This is not including the support of slavery .. for which was successful disproving any difference between those of another ethnic origin and that of a Caucasian (other than color). The Catholic church supported it in trying to gain more followers, yet if all are equal in the eyes of God then this violates the bible, thus a violation within the bible in and amongst it's self, and thus a disproof of Catholic's God. And finally this hasn't even started over how stupid we as humans are created. (See video) http://www.youtube.com... Thank you for your time. He has no defense and thus his semantics should be disregarded.