Atheism is a belief

I have not contradicted myself or backtracked in my argument. Trying to state this is a tactic to win a debate without proving your claim. I have been consistent through out my posts. Again, I never made the assumption that atheist must claim that God does not exist. And again I have not claimed that all atheist reject the idea of God. That is one of the two definitions for atheism. Not believing or rejecting the idea of God. In reality you are saying that atheism or "agnostic-atheism" is rejecting the idea of God. You say that you would rather use disbelief. Disbelief - "refusal to believe" (Webster's New World College Dictionary) "Disbelief does not warrant belief" This is a quote from your last post. First this falls under my first argument against the idea that "its not belief its lack of belief". Your political party reference makes the assumption that I am only giving two choices. To believe in God or not to believe in God. I never made this assumption. This is the 3rd time you have misrepresented my argument (Straw man) in an attempt to prove me wrong. As stated above, as well as in my other arguments, there is the option of not knowing if God exists. When a person is placed in the position to believe something (God or science) and there is not enough evidence to make a definite correct assumption; the answer they give will be a belief. You either believe, you don't believe, or you believe something else. They are all beliefs. There are only two ways to have an absence of belief; one is to disregard or ignore the question. If you ignore the question you can not be theist, atheist, or agnostic. The other is to never be put in the situation to form a belief, being Ignorant of the situation. "The agnostic must make a claim as to his or her belief in a God or gods," This is a quote from your last post. An agnostic does not make a claim if God or gods exist. All of the definitions used for agnostic show that a true agnostic believes that there is no way to tell if God exists. Even the definition you used in your second post. "Most atheists simply do not believe in a God, and that follows naturally from there being no evidence." A quote from your last post. "Atheism is a belief" this is my argument. You keep going back and forth in your own argument claiming that atheism is not a belief, but then you make these statements through out our argument contradicting yourself. "This is because you are grouping categories that have nothing to do with each other". A quote from your last post. Again you have misrepresented my argument. I have been the one separating the categories. You are the one grouping the categories. "You are playing with definitions" A quote from your last post. I have given the exact definitions from Webster's New World College Dictionary. Those definitions have not been disproven in this argument in any way. You have actually backed up my definitions with your own in round 2. My argument is based off of those definitions. I have not played with the wording in any way. (Off Topic) "I do not feel like I should be forced to defend Dawkins". A quote from your last post. I did not bring Dawkins into the argument. You were using him as evidence for your argument and it backfired on you. I was actually the one who threw this part of the argument to the side saying it was not relevant to the main Idea.