Objective Beauty Exists

"Mozart is the greatest composer of all. Beethoven created his music, but the music of Mozart is of such purity and beauty that one feels he merely found it—that it has always existed as part of the inner beauty of the universe waiting to be revealed." (Albert Einstein) Accepted premise: Mathematics and physics are objective in both concept and application. I'd also like to make it clear that attractiveness is not beauty and beauty is not attractiveness. When we think of that which is attractive to us, it embodies subjective factors, and those subjective factors may interfere with our perception of beauty. My first case will be that math and physics carry features that are found within beauty namely: perfection, symmetry, and elegance. I won't go into the details of the work of Murray Gell-Mann, a 1969 Nobel Prize in Physics; however in the transcript cited below, and in his book: Quark and the Jaguar he explains the connection between math and symmetry, math and elegance and their relationship of physics. So it is my contention that physics and math contain those characteristics of beauty. Perfection being the state of being without flaw or defect. The physical law of the angle of incidence equals the angle of refraction is perfect symmetrical; as is the mathematical equation. This is a single example of a law of physics where we have those qualities that I mentioned, and adding to that other laws of reflection, like double reflection we enter in elegance. To allow us to go from the conceptual level of this beauty to the physical so that our ability to see the beauty can be found in a scene like this: http://en.wikipedia.org... "Beauty may lie within conceptual reality: The human mind has first to construct forms, independently, before we can find them in things." Albert Einstein To further illustrate the connection between the objectivity of math and how beauty lies within its realm we can see this readily in music. Not all music is beautiful, not all music carries the traits of what I have outlined as objective beauty, but I will pull some examples of what I consider to be fairly obvious works. First I ask to consider the concept of natural progression in music. This where there is a set number of variables within successive notes in a particular melody. Without natural progression (sometimes known as harmonic progression) and the mathematics that surround the choice of ‘next note' there would be no music as we know music. The easiest place to see an example of math in music is with the compositions of J. S. Bach, and specifically his fugues. In music a tone or note holds a value in relation to other tones or notes. When we add these values to the concept of natural progression, we have the fundamentals of music. However, when we add an algorithm of harmony, tempo, and a the variable of counterpoint (a musical form involving the simultaneous sound of two or more melodies), we can actually hear math, we can hear the conceptual perfection, elegance and symmetry. To take it a step further I give you Mozart. Mozart takes the mathematical algorithms to the greatest depths of elegance than any other composer (known to me). The relationship between melody and harmony is very mathematical, particularly in the classical era. Mozart had an ability to combine the two with amazing elegance. Mozart has the ability to intertwine harmony and melody with such complexity, and yet such simplicity that the math behind it is both obvious and mysterious. It is important to know that Mozart was an amateur mathematician and would solve complex math problems for his own entertainment (from the book of A. Einstein cited below). I ask the readers of this debate to know that I have chosen only a couple examples of objective beauty, and where it lies in the world of math and science. I also ask the readers of this debate to consider that math and it's symmetry, perfection, and elegance are objective and exist. Vote pro http://www.google.com...= http://dotsub.com... http://www.google.com...= Mozart his Character his Work by A. Einstein