Islamic terrorism the new Soviet Union, how empires invent enemies

Why do I even bother... You've already proven to me you can only mindlessly spew quotes that agree with you on the surface, so whatever I say you'll just whine about and call me a [insert a zero-effort insult that involves my political leaning and how it doesn't agree with your meaningless drivel, and for that you must also attach an epithet, regardless of the veracity of what I'm saying here]. Do you even read the sources you're referencing, then not citing? Actually looking them up and reading them reveals them to be more in line with my pro-America stance, you revolutionary LARPer. Also, again, you focus on the fact that we're fighting a war against people who fight without a uniform and hide in a crowd of like-minded people cleverly disguised as innocents, until they come here and think they're superstars and will go to heaven for killing defenseless people. Also, I take it beheadings and gulags simply don't exist in your laughable anti-America narrative. When Islamic terrorists are pulling genocides, maybe, just maybe, what they're doing to, well, not us, but they want to do it to us, should be concerning. Actually, you know what, I'd be closer to Josef Stalin than anything else. You can take your National Socialism and stuff it. Number Three sticks out. Obama abandoning American interests was a pretty common theme in his attempt at dragging America down. Do you even know what you're talking about? You clearly do not if what you're saying is to be taken at face value. Number Four is hilarious. OF COURSE the Saudis were behind 9/11. They had no reason not to be. Wahhabism came from Saudia Arabia, and is quite strong there. The requests for bin Laden's info were denied because the Saudis didn't want that stuff to come to light, because America can dish some pretty harsh reprisals. Also, is "fascist crack pot" the best (unsubstantiated) insult you can fling? My detailing of your failures is justified and explained. Your laughable attempt at ad hominem is just you being a toxic blight on humanity, resulting to juvenile insults in a serious debate. Stop it. Please. I want to take you and your anti-America whining seriously so I can actually write a serious rebuttal. This is just pathetic. Anyway, liberal whining aside, the terrorists came to US. You don't see Americans publically beheading Muslims screaming "death to Islam!" in the streets. If they hadn't been dumb enough to anger America, things would be a lot better for all involved, but no, they had to manufacture a refugee "crisis" to slip their guys into Europe so as to ruin our perfectly good society via terrorism. The Soviet Union was aggressively expansionistic, as seen in the decades following WWII. In short, you have no idea what the world is like outside your First World privilege. Stop it. Also, here, have a serious retort to Pro, in order. 1) The USA funded the Taliban during the Cold War like it supplied the Soviets in WWII. There was something worse running around and those guys were the best bet. Right now, we're actually supplying the Kurds, so the cycle continues, but on a smaller scale each time. 2) http://www.independent.co.uk... "The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported that the PR firm, Bell Pottinger, worked alongside top US military officials at Camp Victory in Baghdad at the height of the Iraq War. The agency was tasked with crafting TV segments in the style of unbiased Arabic news reports, videos of Al-Qaeda bombings that appeared to be filmed by insurgents, and anti-insurgent commercials " and those who watched the videos could be tracked by US forces." Do you know what this means? It's INFORMATION WARFARE, and it is perfectly fair. I mean, you're making it out to be propaganda aimed at the American populace, when in reality "The CDs were encoded to open the videos on RealPlayer software that connects to the Internet when it runs. It would issue an IP address that could then be tracked by US intelligence." That's right, it was actually a means of hunting terrorists. 3) Again, Obama abandoned American allies, which is what caused this whole uproar. Incidentally, under Obama, America entered a state of decline that Trump's pulling us out of. 4 part i) http://articles.latimes.com... The terror suspect is scared of his HOME GOVERNMENT, not the CIA as Pro would have you believe. 4 part ii) http://www.independent.co.uk... Again, the Saudis had interests in not releasing that information because they have a vested interest in not being crushed under our martial tread, and the reveal that they supplied bin Laden would mean that they would be still be smoking crater right now, so hard would they have been smacked. In short, you have no idea what you're talking about, please refrain from saying anything until such a time as you can retrieve your cranium from your rectum. Talking out of there muffles what you're trying to say. Oh, also, nice directly quoting an article without citing your source. Why am I citing the sources (that actually agree with me) and providing context, while you're just copy-pasting and not providing references? There's a term for that and it's "plagiarism". You also think we should just take what you say at face value and not actually read the articles? Too bad. I actually fact-check, and you have just, well, made yourself look like an idiot. Please stop dragging me down into this pathetic lack of effort you call a debate. I want to actually indulge in a little intellectual exercise from time to time. (I am absolutely racist against people who don't pledge allegiance to the same flag I do. It's something to do with being a civic nationalist on my part.)