Evolution is an undeniable fact!

In this final round i will address few things and bring out my closing statement. My opponent still says that until we observe it,we cannot know if it is possible. I will say once again that you are asking for example of macroevolution,the one thing is example,the other is evidence. We already have enough answers from genetics to prove that macroevolution is happening,but to ask for an example is something else. Of course,the example would prove macroevolution,but right now, there are no clear examples. Wolves and dogs indeed can interbreed and produce fertile offspring,but are both adapted to live in different environments,for example dog would never survive in the forest because it has been bred to be dependent on humans,and it is also inexperienced in hunting. It's true that the artificial selection dog to wolf can be explained through microevolution,but the time scale is about 10000 years.They are considered by taxonomy as different species,but for a reason. Wolves today have been exposed mainly to natural selection and are not bred by humans,but dogs were. The cauliflower and broccoli are considered the same species because humans interfered with both of those "species". Both species have been exposed to artificial selection at the same rate,and now you can say that they are quite different despite the fact they are the same species. Wolves have been exposed to natural selection mostly,but dogs to artificial selection. We can see as fact that dogs have been changing rapidly throughout these 10000 years to many different breeds. Wolves have been changing very slowly because they mostly kept the same type of habitat,and we can see that wolves today look similar to wolves 10000 years ago. We can see it as fact that wolves and dogs are going in very different directions,and we can logically conclude that for a few 100's of thousands of years dogs and wolves probably will not be able to produce viable offspring with eachother,and it is true that wolves and dogs have common ancestor from which they started diverting into many different kinds. I would like for us to look at a possible example of macroevolution that is probably already known to us: the common ancestor of humans and other great apes. The transitional fossil evidence proves that there was progressive change in ancestor to human transition and also in ancestor to chimp. I would like to address right now that no monkey evolved into human (which is a straw man fallacy that many people bring up). There was australopithecus afarensis (Lucy), that dated 3.7 mya,then australopithecus africanus from 3 mya,then homo habilis,then homo erectus,then homo neanderthal,and then finally homo sapiens. It is known that our own species,homo sapiens and the neanderthal were relatives,not descendant of each other. Each of these species at one point had common ancestor which was also the ancestor with chimps. Transitional fossils show the progressive change of these extinct species. Genetics also prove that we and chimps share 97-98% of our genetic code,which makes us and chimps closest relatives. https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com... http://www.youtube.com... Also i want to say that humans have 46 chromosomes,but all other great apes have 48. This was studied and it has been proven that chromosome 2 in humans is actually fused chromosome from 2 chimp chromosomes. Finally i will say that many people do not know that there are tons of evidence for (macro)evolution,and still demand that they see the example of it,which is quite ironic. I said it before and i will say it again. Genetics already prove enough that evolution (both micro and macro) is happening.I will finish this round and this debate with Carl Sagan's quote from one debate which is exactly what i was talking about: "The Darwinian concept of evolution and natural selection is profoundly verified, not just by the fossil record, not just by the clear experience of artificial selection, but by the record in the nucleic acids, which is obtained by DNA sequencing, in which we can see the similarities and differences of organisms, and trace their evolutionary past"their history." I want to thank my opponent for participating in this debate and everyone who read this debate. I wish good luck to my opponent and i am anxiously awaiting the last response. Sources: http://images.google.com... http://www.brainyquote.com... http://learn.genetics.utah.edu... http://youtube.com...