Homosexuality is a psychological issue not a genetic issue

In this situation of course sexuality does have an influence in research. It is actually outstanding how I have to explain this, but if someone is a homosexual, there is a blatant bias into their research because they want to "prove" that they are born this way. If a homosexual researcher, when doing their research, finds out that it is not a genetic issue, since it does not fit their agenda, they will not acknowledge the fact that they are not born that way and will have to settle with the possibility that they are psychologically "messed up". It is easier for someone to say that they are "born this way" than to admit that there is trauma in their life that has led up to this behavior. Here is my evidence to back up my claim that homosexuality is a psychological issue: 1.) Homosexuality was considered a mental illness up until the release of the DSM III. On the proposal paper for its removal from the DSM it states " During the 1973 meeting of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) a vote of the trustees reveled that in the opinion of the members, homosexuality was no longer considered to be a mental disorder, the change became effective in the 7th printing of the DSM-II (American Psychiatric Association, 1973). Orthodox practitioners in the mental health profession, felt that the change in policy was caused by pressures from the gay community and that there was insufficient scientific evidence to support such a move by the APA (Bayer & Spitzer, 1982). " INSUFFICIENT SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE 2.) There are reasons to show that homosexual parents have an impact on their children's sexuality. The New Family Structure Study found that children of lesbian mothers only 61% claim to be completely homosexual, as apposed to 90% from heterosexual families. Clearly that has an impact. That study is very interesting I will link you to some of their findings: http://cdn.deseretnews.com... 3.) Homosexuality can be linked with being molested as a child. From: http://borngay.procon.org... David W. Purcell, JD, PhD, states from a study that "MSM [men who have sex with men] consistently report more CSA [childhood sexual abuse] overall and more CSA with males than heterosexual men do" Clearly that can have an impact on the psyche of a child. This can easily form a sort of psychological trauma to the children who have experienced this. A manifestation of this trauma can lead towards: replication, vengeance, inclination towards this behavior. 4.) Homosexuality can be related towards the lack of a parent-child relationship. CSNews reported a story with a homosexual child stating "He describes experiencing a great deal of sexual confusion due to the lack of a father figure in his life. He turned to a life of prostitution with older men as a teenager. "I had an inexplicable compulsion to have sex with older males," he recounted, saying he "wanted to have sex with older men who were my father"s age, though at the time I could scarcely understand what I was doing." This is logically sound because a boy/girl can yearn for a relationship with his/her father/mother. If that relationship is not met they can tend to still have that void, so when reaching puberty if they still have that void it can affect them on how they react towards mating. There is however no evidence to prove that it is biological. One claim that I can use to counter argue you already is the case of the Collin twins (or any other homosexual identical twins). Jason and Jarron Collins are identical twins. Jason is homosexual, Jarron is heterosexual. If it were genetic, since the two share the EXACT SAME DNA, they would both be gay. In an article 8 major studies made this same conclusion that homosexuality is not genetic because of twins. Here is the article, read it for yourself: http://www.redflagnews.com... I think I have given sufficient evidence and there are more anecdotal evidence I can give such as Antoine Dodson, but since you asked for EVIDENCE I decided to give that to you. Also, in order to be fair, I did not use any sources that are religiously affiliated. Although Christianity accepts homosexuals at this point, people are still suspicious of their authenticity. I await your HORRIBLE response. Provide evidence, but no bias evidence. Also think about things logically. ROUND 2