BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Biblical Young Earth Creationism is scientifically probable.

Welcome everyone to this debate!I hope to give a chance to any opponent who wishes to show me (and indeed, the Internet), that BYEC (Biblical Young Earth Creationism) is scientifically probable.I will define BYEC as follows:"The belief that the God described in the Bible created the Earth in six literal Earth days; the belief that the Earth is between 5,700 and 10,000 literal Earth years old; the belief that this god created humans in their present "form" (homosapien); and the belief that there were originally two humans (one man and one woman) that lived in a perfect place known as "The Garden of Eden"."This definition isn't perfect, and if you want to change it then please post a comment; every Creationist has certain differences in their beliefs, after all. The definition above is not fixed. However, my opponent must agree to the definition of the God described in the Bible as:"Omniscient (all-knowing), omnipotent (all-powerful to the extent of the logically possible), omnipresent (all-present, always there, everywhere), and omnibenevolent (always right, always moral, all-good)."Unless anyone thinks that this definition is inherently flawed, this is not a debatable definition. So, I believe all the other definitions speak for themselves, so I will now state the rules:1) The first round is not for acceptance only; the first round is for both acceptance of the rules and for Pro's opening case.2) In the fifth round, Pro must state (and only state) the following "No argument posted here as agreed". 3) The BoP is on Pro to prove the resolution to be correct. The BoP is on Con to prove Pro's contentions as false, thus stopping Pro from meeting his/her burden.4) A forfeit of a round is an automatic loss of conduct (regardless of the reason), but it is only a loss of conduct.5) There can be no "Vote Pro" or "Vote Con" at the end of the debate unless one of the debaters consented.6) Sources are considered accurate unless proved to be otherwise. ((Therefore, Wikipedia, TalkOrigins, AnswersInGenesis etc... are considered accurate, although the reliability of the sources will be up to the voters.))I believe that's all, if anybody has any questions, please post a comment! Good luck to all, and allez!
Globally Bent Timespace is the Underworld

The 1st dimension is length, the 2nd dimension is width, the 3rd dimension is height, the 4th dimension is time, the 5th dimension is through variously bent timespaces, the 6 th dimension is sideways in time through all the probability timelines, the 7th dimension is from zero percent entropy to one hundred percent entropy, the 8th dimension is the height of Ricci's curvature, the 9th dimension is width of Ricci's curvature, and the 10th dimension is the length of Ricci's curvature. The height of Ricci's curvature measures the extent of differentiation. It is personal for us all, for, spikes of Ricci's curvature, for our circuit, are pains. The length and width of Ricci's curvature determines the properties of consciousness. No Ricci's curvature, no existence, no consciousness. Just like the rubber sheet I use to demonstrate Ricci's curvature, Ricci's curvature stresses to snap back down to its original flatness, no Ricci's curvature, nonexistence, the satisfaction of all desires.
Globally Bent Timespace is the Underworld

In M-String Theory, the total dimensions is 10, comprised of the 4-dimensional space-time, and 6-dimensional Calabi-Yau Manifold.The 6-dimensional Calabi-Yau manifold is unobservable and inaccessible, and hence, no matter how you bend space-time, it can never be the Underworld.Proof - https://en.wikipedia.org...According to Sabine Hossenfelder aka Bee (inspiration for the Character Howard in Big Bang Theory), Max Tegmark is a crackpot.Proof - http://backreaction.blogspot.co.id...Hugh Everett is a bigger crackpot, and considered by Neils Bohr as worthless.Proof - http://motls.blogspot.co.id...More Proof - http://motls.blogspot.co.id...
Globally Bent Timespace is the Underworld

Globally bent timespace, in a fifth dimensional direction is not necessarily the only dimension of the underworld. The sixth dimension can be defined to be that dimension through all the probability timelines sideways in time, and, it is experienced as part of the underworld. The probability timelines are understandably revealed by Dr. Max Tegmark in his May 2003 Scientific American article about the "Multiverse". Dr. Hugh Everett verified these probability timelines in the mid-Twentieth Century. Mathematics of quantum physics doesn't work without taking these probability timelines into consideration. It even changed the way school text books pictured atoms. Originally, atoms were pictured to be like little solar systems, like on the TV show "Big Bang Theory". But, later atoms were pictured as fuzz balls, each little dot of fuzz representing the possible location of an electron.
Globally Bent Timespace is the Underworld

I admire the thesis of my opponent, and I agree to most of them. However, while Globally Bent Timespaces and the Underworld are real, there is no good argument and evidence why they are symmetric (ie the same) or at least why there are connected. Bending time-space simply bends it. So it remains the same timespace with different geography, or different coordinate system. Assuming that bent time-space is or grants access to the Underworld has consequences that are false based on daily experience - * Black holes and the Big bang singularity are good examples of globally bent time-spaces. In fact, the singularity is the origin of spacetime itself. To say that bent timespaces is the Underworld is to conclude that the singularity is the Underworld or is a subset of it. And so naturally, our universe came from the Underworld, or a subset of it. But this is false. Our world based on daily experience is different from the Underworld. If they are the same, we would not have bothered to differentiate them. * Matter and Dark Matter (which weakly interacts with each other thru gravity) are produced at the same time during the big bang. Dark Matter therefore has better correspondence to the Underworld. Both world and underworld are created simultaneously during the big bang, as opposed to the notion that the world came from the underworld. Lisa Randall said - Dark Matter, and not Globally Bent Timespace, killled the Dinosaurs.
Globally Bent Timespace is the Underworld

LGBT and EPR do not connect to the UnderworldI am not arguing for the conversation of information.Instead, if consciousness is to traverse the underworld, there must be SOME information transfer (not necessarilly ALL information) between the world of the living and the world of the undead.Similar to a fax machine, only the text needs to be scanned and transferred. There is no need to transfer the paper.However, in LGBT and EPR, matter cancels into NOTHINGNESS. No information is transferred to anywhere, and so can't be the means to transfer consciousness to the underworld.Dark Matter is the UnderworldMatter interacts with Dark Matter thru quantum gravity, and so can facilitate consciousness transfer thru phase transition and quantum tunneling.As Lisa Randall had pointed, Dark Matter killed the Dinosaurs, and it is only logical that the "essence" of the dinosaurs had been tunneled into Dark Matter in the 5th dimension.Globally Bent Timespace is...bending to itselfAs the name implies, the bending of timespace only bends upon itself.So it is the same world but oriented differently.Bending it "under" does not result to the "underworld". It results to an "upside down" version of the same world.This is derived from personal experience and study of the mobius strip.Experience of Globally Bent Timespace (LGBT)I also have experience with LGBT, and the bending can cause disorientation.The disorienation can cause consciousness dispersion (aka. nausea and dizziness) which explains the feeling of nothingness.This experience is "underwordly" and can be misinterpreted as the underworld, however, they are different. The underworld can only be accessed thru the complete disintegration of the biological construct, and so necessitates that consciousness permeates, not into nothingness, but into the underworld. and the bending can sometimes be experienced as "underwordly" and can be mischaracterized as the underworld, however, they are different.
Globally Bent Timespace is the Underworld

There is no law of the conservation of information. Rather the Second Law of Thermodynamics guarantees that all information, and matter is alpha code information ("Living Systems" by Dr. James Miller), will undifferentiate back into undifferentiated energy. Of course Dr. Lisa Randal didn't use terms like "underworld". But, from personal experience my associates and I found that globally bent time space is what has been called the Underworld. I don't believe in theories. I first have the experience, and then, I try to find a theories to explain it. Google lahunken for more information.
Globally Bent Timespace is the Underworld

My opponent has shown the GBT and the underworld are real.For the purpose of unification, I shall refer to GBT as LGBT (Landau GBT) to generalize the effect of diamagnetism and second-order phase transitions to consciousness as observed by Lev Landau (together with Von Neumann).However, the conclusion that LGBT is the underworld is wrong. Reasons are -REASON 1LGBT connects the present spacetime to the past and future. There is no evidence it connects to the underworld.The DeLorean travelled to 1885, 1955, 1985, 2015. Not to underworld.The Philadelphia experiment sent ships to different timelines and locations. It was eventually used to send the entire Nazy army to the moon.Evidence - We would have sent the Nazis directly to the underworld if it can be done thru LGBT.Finally, the Tesla Teleporter is just that...a timespace Teleporter/Cloner. Angie's clones emerge, not on the underworld, but on the land of the living.Angie would have used the Teleporter to see his dead wife if tunneling to the underworld can be done. Borden's twin, instead of the Teleporter, had to put a bullet on Angie to send him to the underworld. REASON 2The EPR as stated is polarity cancellation, and therefore, pair of nucleons cancel into NOTHINGNESS.But traversal into the underworld require that information encoded in consciousness is preserved, and not cancelled.In Shannon's Information Law, Rate of Information = Bandwidth x Log2 (1 + SINR), where SINR = Signal to Noise Ratio.In EPR, the Signal is cancelled, implying no information is sent. Therefore, information traversal does not occur to anywehere.Thru EPR, what remains is noise (entropy).In the performance of closed cyclic machines like refigerators, entropy always increases.Just because there is "entropy production", it does not mean that last night's left-overs go to the underworld.REASON 3Although Lisa Randall establishes that there is a 5th dimension, nowhere did she conclude that it is nor is it means to access the underworld.The underworld is not accessed via LGBT. It is accessed thru Dark Matter.Evidence - http://www.businessinsider.sg...As Lisa Randall pointed out, Dark Matter caused the Dinosaur's extinction!This extinction was cataclism itself, filled with fire and brimstone.In Rev 21:8But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death (Underworld).Dark matter constitutes ~24% of the known universe, and are known to clump around massive blackholes at the center of most galaxies.And since Dark matter has a significant quantum graviational effect, it also has a binding effect to our consciousness, retaining it (consciousness) even after the degradation of the biological constructs which nurtured and enveloped it.Evidence - http://www.starlarvae.org...See John Searle Video
Globally Bent Timespace is the Underworld

If the Ricci curvature stresses to snap back down to its original flatness, it is therefore...FLAT.Flatness is the exact opposite of Globally BENT timespace.The lack of Ricci curvature (ie FLATNESS) may result to non-existence, satisfaction of all desires, or even the underworld, but it can not be due to Globally BENT timespace.In Inception, the dream within a dream within dream...goes to down to one direction, to deeper levels of consciousness.A dream within a dream cannot bend and find itself in the real world.
Resolved: Negros should not be allowed to enter white restaurants.

Argument: We black folk should not be allowed in whitey's restaurants because Shaquadelind & her 6 bad-@ss, held-back-a-grade kids will inevitable disturb the peace of those baked potato-eating snowflakes with ghetto loud-talking, constant complaining of the small napkins, & a final shenanigan of contending that they should get their meals free since the restaurant didn't post food stamps are not allowed as payment. Likewise, incest-loving, bestiality-practicing white folks shouldn't be allowed to perform Negro invented dances or embrace niggerish infused music. Here is prime example of what you sun-cursed, Caspery Caucasoids look like when you freely adopt jigaboo-moves with coon-infused music:Robin Sicke & Miley Virus-- http://www.youtube.com...My opponent has left me no argument of his to rebut.
vi_spex is a bot

Time-travel It could be that you can only travel in the past where you have your body to give your future memories to. You won't be able to travel where you weren't born. But yes, its an unlikely supposition. AI The AI could easily be tested and then removed. Yet vi_spex has been here for a long time, and his code doesn't seem to be updated. The AI would have to not only choose the random time when to post comments and debates, but also figure out a way to read the opponents arguments and act upon them. In Pro's captcha debate, vi_spex remarked it looked like a pony to him. That is only possible if he saw the captcha and acted upon it. Even in vi_spex's brain capacity, an AI like that would take lot of hard coding and would form an artificial intelligence currently unheard of. Why does vi_spex do this It is because he wants to see how will people react to such a persona, and whether there will be supporters or not. Or more likely, he has been instructed to do so for money by Juggle.
vi_spex is a bot

My opponent argues that a developer would have no reason to spend the time developing an AI that could be vi_spex. This is wrong because there are multiple reasons to create such an AI such as a learning exercise or a resume builder. On the other hand, it would make no sense for a person to waste their time keeping up the persona that is vi_spex. For the AI learning how to opperate DDO, all that would have had to be done is for the person programming the vi_spex AI could have hard coded the api calls needed to post debates, arguments, messages, etc. on DDO, so instead of the AI needing to "figure out" how to use DDO, it could have pre-programmed knowledge to do so, so the AI would only have to focus on what and when to post. So it wouldn't be as hard to create an AI to be vi_spex as my opponent implied. My opponent's other rebuttals are too weak for me to need to rebuttal them. Example: "Time travel You can never know whether it was possible or not." I trust judges are able to recognize how weak those rebuttals are.
vi_spex is a bot

Captchas In a school there are cheaters, they are not given captchas. Online, since vi-spex hasn't officially "cheated" or is guilty for anything, he doesn't have to prove his "innocence". He is to keep up his persona and will continue giving answers in his twisted style of speech. AI "Stage 1: a portal entrance on winter rose mountain, into the dark of snake maze. What do you not understand in this sentence? He is trying to recreate some play and is creating a hypothetical debate, instead you troll him asking if he is a bot. I would be downright offended if this had happened with me. Furthermore, an AI is a complex thing, especially if it needs to learn to operate debate.org on its own (if it doesn't, then someone has to click everytime and oversee the operation, and therefore vi_spex remains a half-human user). A developer investing their time into this is unlikely, as vi-spex hasn't achieved anything on debate.org, and there is no gain for the developer. Therefore vi_spex is not an AI. Psychological condition Hey I am no doctor am I? Yet you have must have heard the phrase "ramblings of a madman" . That madman could be vi_spex. Time travel You can never know whether it was possible or not. It could be that time-travel is outlawed in the future due to maniacs trying to change history to their benefits, therefore no known evidence. Furthermore, vi_spex doesn't have to time-travel physically. He would have sent his memories through the time-portal to his past self, but since the process was not perfect, it wiped his memory's previous not so impeccable grammar, or turned him into an incoherent madman. He even could have taken drugs or alcohol while browsing this site, to allow his persona to build for his own reasons. Or that vi_spex is actually a cyborg, a half-human and a half-robot. There are many possibilities in the realm of vi_spex., but an AI is quite unlikely in one of them.
vi_spex is a bot

Captchas Most people when accused of cheating, would be willing to answer a single captcha to prove their innocence. AI What vi_spex writes is in fact nonsense. If you think there is meaning in what vi_spex writes, it is most likely because humans have a tendency of finding meaning in random data. psychological condition Con mentions vi_spex could have some psychological condition, but Con needs to reference at least one specific psychological condition for this theory to be plausible. Time travel not possible Traveling back in time has never been proven possible. In addition, it can be assumed that time travel is not possible because it would allow paradoxes that can't happen, such as the grandfather paradox. Therefor we can assume that vi_spex is not a time traveler from the future.
vi_spex is a bot

Captchas vi_spex is a cheeky human. He must have felt giving the answer to a captcha as offensive. If you give me a damn captcha, I am NOT going to answer it. I even have the picture of a bot. AI Your link says that they were AI generated nonsense. Yet vi_spex debates are not nonsense. In fact, this paragraph from your debates is finally something from vi_spex that I can understand- "Stage 1: a portal entrance on winter rose mountain, into the dark of snake maze. no one has ever died in snake maze, altough many have come close to death at the silent white and black snakes hiding in the noises of falling winter rose leafs, slithering in darkness of the maze. Stage 2. A microscopic lightning strike from the center of a spider trofy. Statue columbs of fearful eyed snakes in a tunnel with a promising light of a cave exit at its end, but caught in a giant spiders sticky web, a talking spider that in its revealed lights offers you a choice, and says you must jump from the edge of the cliff at the end of the tunnel or becomes the spider food, and first you must grab on to one of its legs to escape with it from the edge of the narrow cave cliff, to land on a ground camouflaged inflatable mattress, and should you do so the power to control fire will be granted to you" Plus, AI development is still under process, and making of an AI that can operate debate.org debates is not known. Vi_spex would have to be an extremely complex and futuristic AI, meaning that vi_spex is just a human. Non human characteristics It is possible that vi_spex suffers from a psychological condition, and there are no exact characteristics of a human. You can't define a human. That would be discrimination. Alternate preposition I argue that vi_spex is a time-traveller from the future, where grammar became so eroded to the point that everyone speaks like vi_spex. vi_spex mentioned an unknown device- desert roller in the comments. I searched desert roller and it is not yet a specific vehicle. Vi_spex is from the future where desert rollers were invented. ALL HAIL VI_SPEX!!!
vi_spex is a bot

AI Capabilities Computers are more than capable of generating text that looks as if it could have been human generated. In fact, computer generated papers have been published in peer reviewed journals. [1] If AI generated text is capable of getting through peer review, then it is certainly able to convince some people on the internet that it was at least human generated. Captchas AI's are not able to read captchas. I tested if vi_spex was able to read a captcha, and he failed. [2] Therefor, it can be concluded that vi_spex is an AI. Non human characteristics No human is like vi_spex. Nothing he says is coherent. He is never able respond to someone else's post in a way that shows he understood it. The frequency at which he debates is far more than any human on this site. Conclusion Vi_spex acts like a bot, and does not act like a human, so the most logical conclusion is that vi_spex is an AI. Sources [1] http://www.nature.com... [2] http://www.debate.org...
Pikachu vs Jibanyan

Let's get into why Jibanyan would beat Pikachu in a battle. To remind everybody, the winner will be based off of the following stats: Power, Speed, Durability, Abilities, and their Trainer. Let's begin. Power;Jibanyan's main attack is the Paws of Fury, which isn't effective against extremely powerful opponents such as Gargaros. However, it's still decently effective on opponents that aren't overpowered, such as Pikachu. Speed;Jibanyan can go pretty fast. In episode 1, Jibanyan has been hit by cars, launched many feet away, only to run right back in little time, and keep at it. Durability;Jibanyan is also pretty durable. Ever since he became a Yo-kai, he's been training daily, attempting to destroy a truck with his Paws of Fury. Every time, however, he kept getting hit, only to come back and try again! His durability and determination makes up for his lack of raw power. Abilities;Jibanyan may not be too strong, but, as a Yo-kai, he's able to Inspirit, or possess, his enemies. When Jibanyan inspirits an opponent, he makes them run in the way of incoming traffic, which is very painful, in case you didn't know. Trainer;Unlike Pokemon, Yo-kai don't require trainers to do well in combat. But Jibanyan does better with a close friend nearby, as he's said in the show. Cheering him on will be Nathan Adams, Jibanyan's friend. Nate is also a quick thinker, and can come up with strategies pretty quickly, as shown several times in the show. Summary:Jibanyan may be lacking in brute force, but his Paws of Fury is still effective. His daily traffic training demonstrates amazing speed and durability prowess. He's been hit by several cars, and can force his opponents to face the same fate. And now it's time for a Battle! !
Pikachu vs Jibanyan

Two mascots of Monster Collection games, Pikachu from Pokemon, and Jibanyan from Yo-kai Watch. I believe Jibanyan has the upper paw in this match up. Rules: 1. This isn't a fight to the death, as Jibanyan is unable to die, as he's a spiritual reincarnation. This is a fight until the opponent can no longer go on. 2. The fight will take place in Jibanyan's hometown, Springdale. 3. Both sides are required to demonstrate the following stats: Power, Speed, Durability, Abilities, and Helper. [If you want more stats to be required, say so in the comments before accepting] 4. Elaborating on the "Helper" stat, we will also unclude Ash Ketchum, Pikachu's trainer, and Nathan Adams, Jibanyan's friend (Master). 5. We will only be referring to the cartoons. Anything exclusive to the video games, like the Light Ball, or any other held items won't count. 6. Forfeiting counts as an instant loss. Make sure you do lots of research, like Screw Attack would do. And make sure you're ready. 7. No Trolling, Kritiks, Semantics, etc. And just a reminder, I'm suggesting Jibanyan would win. I'll demonstrate this in the next round. My opponent will be suggesting Pikachu will win, and will show this in the 2nd Round.