Christianity is the most rationally based faith

"You took those scriptures completely out of context and I will explain how.""In this context, it's speaking of God's abilities in making miracles happen, not his moral character. No contradiction"So "nothing" isn't to be taken seriously or isn't literal?In original Greek it doesn't seem to refer only to miracles too[1].It literally refers to "every thing" in Greek. I really think the original "word of God" would try to be more clear."You just admitted that the Bible's predictions are true and accurate."No i didn't,what i meant is that it is very unlikely that in every person born in 2000~ years no one would mock your religion,given that even before the prediction there were people mocking God so that isn't too big of an accomplishment,it is the same as someone guessing that in the future it will rain,because it eventually will. It doesn't proves anything. It just happened to be true because it was very unlikely not to be."If you predict "Tomorrow will rain" then it's very likely to happen. but "tomorrow will rain" isn't a biblical prediction and i will show why."But even less likely that in 2000~ years there wouldn't be a single mocker."Matt. 24:3-8 says "For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many." How likely is it for people to self-proclaim themselves as the Messiah of Israel and be deceived? According to Peter W. Stoner's book "Science speaks", he uses probability to calculate the likelihood of people predicting future events with precise accuracy and it is very very low (1). When you examine the archaeological, linguistic, mathematical (in this case the prediction of false messiahs), scientific, historical data, political events, etc. it confirms the accuracy of prophecy."This refers to someone saying that he is Christ or the Messiah and not to mockers,and i don't see anyone saying that he is Christ and being deceived,the examples you gave are just mockers."They are only building the temple because the Bible predicted."Again,no i didn't,i'm just saying that if i predict something and then force it to happen i don't think it is very credible. In my rock example,do you think i would be able to predict everything after forcing my prediction to be true?If there was some prediction in the Qur'an that could be forced would you think they were true too because people who followed it made it happen?"He does want his followers to study hermenuetics."Instead of making his word clear and easier for Christians?"Show me evidence for the claims of other religions. The Bible states that once a person dies, it's over, confirming scientific fact. Where's the evidence for that we are reincarnated into this life?"No it doesn't,it says that you are going to you are going to be judged after you die and that you are going either to hell or to heaven. The idea of reincarnation is more simple and likely. If your God does exist hell must be really crowded,because new people keep being born and taking the burden for what their ancestors did instead of just going to another body and passing the "test" again. And hell and heaven must be pretty giant,as it must fit a really large amount of people inside it,i think it would be noticeable. Even if a creator existed i don't think it would be contradicting as the bible,Deism is more likely to be true. There are absolute laws that don't have a motive,like gravity,what points to a creator. Your bible doesn't say anything about those laws. Also,you didn't said anything about Satanism[3],which is based only on morality and reason,but it is still a religion. And you made the claim,you have the BoP to show me that Christianity is the most factual religion,not me,and i think it will be pretty hard for you to show it. [1]:http://biblehub.com...[2]:http://www.deism.com...[3]:http://www.churchofsatan.com...