Videos for people is great.

1. 4 sentences can defeat many paragraphs in a debate, it depends on how you use them. 2. You should be biased, not the argument itself. 3. Yes, darkmain. He does not use it as much, rather he uses it at the proper moments to amplify the humor of his videos. How can you know anyone does it differently anyways. The way YouTube is now, you would not be able to see others who could be like him because you don't know the channel name. I quoted what you said to rebuke your specific points. It is a simple way to debate that I use when I don't need an overarching argument. 4. Strep is obviously a bacteria, the symptoms of it show that. You just seem to not know as much as the average person. I was using the butterfly effect as an example, so it was not meant to be part of the video. The message was quite obvious, you just did not understand my statement it seems. My point is that just because a person can't save everyone, does not mean they should not help those in front of him, the other point I made was that most people think this at some point, you just were not there yet, so it is not interesting because I have already thought of this. 5. You yet again did not understand what I said and said the same of me, I understand what he is conveying, I am just saying that he is wrong. As I said before first impressions are important. So by starting with all we have accomplished we lessen the follies that they learn about later on. 6. Not really. I have seen comedy channels do the. same thing. COMEDY channels. The amount of deeper channels if likely devasting. And deadpool is about a man who learns of his nonexistent life and decides to kill everyone out of mercy, it is the other way to take this revelation. 7. The way he does this is what is wrong. He makes it inflammatory which makes people not want to listen, if he said it in a more serious way it might be ok. 8. Not really. It is just kinda dry, I don't feel a need to do any of this because he does not make it seem interesting, I would guess others feel the same way. 9. Don't you even dare call this philosophic. These ideas don't even scratch the surface of philosophy. YOU think he is good, I think he is mediocre at best, boring at worst. He really does just pander to a younger audience through the fact that he focuses on specific ideas that older people have already thought of previously. He just does not seem underappreciated, he just seems to not have a large enough amount of people who like his style, me included. He does fairly simplistic ideas with even simpler punchlines, and he does not think differently, he just talks about ideas that others have already thought of and attempts to make younger people think he is a genius. I will comment on the rest in this paragraph. Try watching jelloapocolypces review of gravity falls to see just how new codes are. Pop culture references are par for the course, and saying they are in the same universe is just as played out. A Christmas episode is fine, but I know guys who do much greater animations that are twice as long and just as funny. And 11 second clips are nothing to blink at. Rock stars should be deserved based on skills, and some are good. And if he is willing to talk about just how underrated he is he deserves it, plain and simple. You get what you get, no use complaining, just do better. To conclude, once again he is not underrated, just nondeserving.