God is better than you and me

Readers keep in mind that this argument to me is like arguing about spells in Harry Potter. I don't believe any of this is actually true it's just debating the details of a work of literature albeit a work of literature that claims to be reality.Dodging Bullets That Hit Their MarkSo I love how you completely ignore the fact that God still commited genocide in the flood and decided to focus on the semantics of what I said about species and then brought up some weird tangent and conjecture about what I might say about dinosaurs. First off let's just clear up your weird dinosaur thing. The dinosaurs did not live at the same time as humans so they wouldn't have been on the ark.Nowhere in my first argument did I actually contradict myself. Logically speaking to fufill the requirement of drowning every species one would simply have to drown one of every species. However this is not what I was stating and you very well know it. In the story of the flood God spares two of every species but he drowns the rest of everything. Do you prefer that wording better? Copy Pasted Arguments So by "found a good argument" you really mean "stole an argument"? Right? This argument is really easily struck down as so much of it is so wrong. First off while the Pharaoh did indeed harded his own heart once or twice before God did it was God who hardened it 7-8 times after that in order to ensure that the pharaoh would not let the Isrealites go (which is another point I'll bring up later) in order to show off his fancy plagues. The other thing that's important to note is that God actually punished every single person in Egypt for the actions of one man. No sane person would think that was justified and it just shows how cruel your God really is. "First the Pharaoh was not an innocent or godly man" Actually yes he was. Innocence is a subective term and doesn't actually literally mean anything on it's own. Now while I would consider enslaving a race of people is guilty beyond belief the Pharaoh most likely never actually did such a thing. That's right the entire book of Exodus is based on a lie. Allow me to explain. Now while it does say in the Bible that the Isrealites were enslaved the Bible is not by any means an accurate historical document due to its hundreds of contradictions and tons of historical inaccuracies. This being said there is absolutely no archealogical evidence to support the claim that 2 million Jews were enslaved in Egypt at the time the Bible states. There are no records from the Egyptians that 1/4 their population up and left nor are there any records of labor shortages around this time. Also with 600,000 families moving across a desert you would figure that they would have left some pottery or carvings with hebrew on it anywhere in the desert however this is not what we find. Instead we find no sort of evidence for such a migration nor do we find any records from natives of Isreal about a population influx of this magnitude.The other claim is that the Pharaoh was not a godly man and this is simply not true as (If were pretending that mythologies such as Christianity are true here) he was a god in human form. Specifically the god Horus, or at least an aspect of him as they also believed he became Osiris when he died. The Pharaoh was an extremely godly man, just not towards your god.You (or more accurately the website you copied this from) also state that bringing the multitude of extra plagues down on the entire population was justified punishment for the Pharaoh for enslaving the Jews (which I have already established is not founded in any sort of archaeological evidence) and that by not destroying egypt he is showing his mercy however this proposterous. Is it merciful for me to kill and torment an entire race of people because of the actions of one man? I should certainly think not.http://www.haaretz.com...http://classroom.synonym.com...