Can Anarcho-Capitalism work

Rebuttal 1. Social Hierachy ' I have never denied that Social Hierarchy would exist in an Anarcho-Capitalist society 2. No Government Right indeed there wouldn't be many rules or should i rather say all the rules that are not needed like i said in my First argument I belive (and many other minarchists/anarchists/libertarians ) that the rules that would exist would be based around the non-agression principle , How do we enforce these rules ? abuse would lead to you ending up in a prison most people already know that killing / rape / physical abuse are morally wrong if a defense agency decided one day that they accept rape and not arrest people for it it would loose thousands of customers. 1) Don't harm other people 2) respect their property 3)that part of nature that you transform and make valuable becomes yours . The violation of these principles is an attempt to live at the expense of others and cannot be allowed 3. Private Property Right let's start of with your first big argument that Anarcho-Capitalism would cause companies to run loose and wild , Unfortunately my partner forgot to mention any examples 'the rich will be favoured and justice ignored' is all i got well first of all if a rich person steals from a middle class or a poor person (which would be weird) it is the interest of the protection agency to protect its client by demanding money from the rich person that rich person would have to pay extra for the crime he comitted and the poorer persons protection agency would benefit too. if the rich person doesn't pay back he may be put in prison for some time and than let out but than after that he will still have to pay the money back (with extra) if a rich person kills a poor person and the poor persons family reports to their protection agency and after the investigation if both protection agencies the one that protects the rich and the ones that protects the poor can't come to an agreement who is right than a third party might get involved to make their own investigation and both protection agencies would have to agree that they will belive what the independant investigators who have no agenda will say another way to to end the argument is for both protection agencies to start fighting however the independant invesgiation would be much more cost effective , the protection agency would have an interest in defending the poor . Than my partner start's talking about 'greed' which he hasn't gave examples of but rather spoke about the concept which is irrelevant in this debate. ' A conflict of interest between Microsoft and Apple has led to these two companies exploiting more workers just to outrun the other company. Even in an example, where anarchy hasn't been practiced yet, two companies can already be seen fighting each other, although not directly, to outrun the other company. This, practiced in anarcho-capitalism, would be a violent scene, much like the current Drug Phenomonom' First i would like to add that Apple and Microsoft are both giant corporations who at least in part have made it this far because they are Corporations , Corporations wouldn't exist in anarchy the Corporation is a business that has extra legals rights from the government and limited liablity , Even so it would be much harder for Big businesses to continue to be so no longer there be stupid government regulations limiting the growth of small businesses in fact corporations want more regulations so it is harder for small businesses to rise the second thing i would like to point out is that giant corporations like Apple and Microsoft 'exploit' workers in Third World countries many of which have socialist-like type of governments and growing local businesses are pretty rare. Wars are not cost efficient social cooperation is actually pretty common amongst some businesses like Macy's and JC penneys and i belive it would become even more popular in a completly free market. 'the middle class will just keep getting richer and richer, while the proletariat would get poorer and poorer, as wages are decreasing and the mere act of corporate policing makes them spend more money.' my partner has failed to back his point out with any evidence or at least a good approach a capitalist economy doesn't work that way sure Rich company owners want to exploit the workers but they cannot because another company owner who pays more his workers will eventually end up making more profit as more workers join him and the reputation of the 'exploitive company' would be ruined.