Resolved: The Angry Video Game Nerd is better than the Irate Gamer.

It's seems as though my opponent has lost the essence of this debate. He is attacking little grammatical errors, and not focusing on the core of this debate topic. I would like the voters to vote on who won the overall arguments, and forget about these little grammatical mistakes. 1. <> This argument is completly vague and does not really prove anything. How does this conflict with the rest of the resolution? How does it fulfill YOUR burden of refutation? With my definition, I seek to prove that overall, the AVGN is of greater quality the Irate gamer as per three areas of analysis. That absolutley does not prove anything to your case. 2. < > Again, this type of arguementation is completly unfair and abusive. My opponent can just take any word and twist it around on me to make me look bad. Do not allow this to take place. That being said, let's take a look at this. Fine, Irate is not better because he simply TRIES TO copy the AVGN. Is that better? Honestly, is this really attacking my arguments? Anyway, my point was that they bare stricking similarities, and Irate should not be recognized for that. Obviously, they are not the same person, but the core of their shows are built off the same idea. This is not a contradiction, because, although their characters are similar, AVGN captures that character better. Also, my opponent fails to mention the point in my first argument: Let's say, by some chance, AVGN and Irate are the EXACT SAME. The only differences are: The names; and that AVGN came first. Still, AVGN would be better. Why? He came first. People do not like copies, so they are more likely to go to the original, ever proving my point that Irate should not be recognized for copying. 3. < > First, most people that vote on this debate have seen both shows, and I'm sure they agree with me. But yes, there is a burden of proof, but I have proven that. "His rants are funnier, he has more clever dialogue, and he uses clever settings to add to the comedy." I said these three things that are never mentioned by Con. I have proved this, and until he argues this, you must vote for my side. Also, here is more burden of proof: The Angry Video Game Nerd's take on BTTF, added July 29, 2006: http://youtube.com... And the Irate Gamer's, added April 28, 2007: http://youtube.com... First the similarities: The glass window, the inaccuracy of objects in the game, the weird placed time clock, the never ending scenery, skateboard really doesn't help, the black vest, background music loop, and the hard milkshake level. Also, the AVGN gets much more angry. It feels like the Irate is forcing jokes. AVGN's are much more subtle. Plus, the AVGN uses video dialogue from the movie that fits perfectly to enhance the mood. Offense- my opponent never directly attacks my arguments. He never says the Irate doesn't copy, nor does he say that's bad, nor that Irate fits is character better or even that he is funnier. With that being said, you face no choice in voting pro. Seeing as how my points were never directly answered, there is no need to restate or defend them. So cross-apply my arguments from round one. Thank you.