Gender neutrality

The point is the total disconnect people have developed in this preposition considering the lesser or higher of one gender to another. It is literally sick, this oligarchic patriarchal stereotype women have pressured onto young girls telling them they are just as capable as boys as women are to men and equally the effeminating of boys. As a man I can only imagine the amount of stress this places on young women through their lives. Men have adapted well to building, creating, killing, destroying, rebuilding, all by the means of contributing to the betterment of the world, not for himself, but his family. Boys and girls think only of themselves, that is natural, but men never think only of themselves and that is simply how its been. Now we want to integrate women into the world of the masculine, no! Why do women think when they come home from their job they are still expected to clean, take care of the children, and cook? It is because men will not separate themselves from the hereditary jurisdiction which only can provide stability and unity among a nation. If men separate themselves from this natural barrier and allow for the "equality" of genders, society will fall apart. There will be genetic chaos and rampant homosexuality. Without distinction between genders society as we know it will not survive, cannot survive. Therefore, men in their innate need to protect women will do all he can to provide for her safety and comfort, because if he fails to protect her, he will die himself; perhaps not physically nor immediately, but his soul will certainly die, crushed and empty. Upon this basis is it not logical that men would have rights to govern society, the workplace, and the home. In modeling, women make 80% more than men. Is this fair, why do men not rise up in anger at society for paying women more than men in the fashion industry? Why not, because men have dealt with ten times worse the hardship through human history to even consider unequal pay something to fight over. In the United States, this countries social structure was developed specifically to cater to the individualist model. The United States was built on free market economics (not slavery). The country was built on a single man"s motivation to provide for his family and the betterment of society. Government did not build this country; the corporations did not build this country. Your great grandfather and his fathers before him built this country, not the effeminate, not homosexuals. Men built this country, men built every country. We did not do this for women cowering in fear to over-through the laws which make us free. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." It does not profess government power; we are free men, absolute, and sovereign beings. We men did not go into battle, kill, and die for you women to sell everything we have fought to establish law before the power structures of the world. It was never about keeping women from voting. Only men were to vote to protect the American culture of individualism and protect the liberties we have fought and bled to preserve for our children. Men were, and very much still are the head of the household, and therefore it was one vote per house hold. It's not about oppression, it was never about oppression. Why would men oppress that which he loves more than anything before God? What is the meaning of life if not to transcend our earthy world? What is the point if not to become more intelligent? Yes, it is about infrastructure, but also to expand in conciseness and become that which we once were before antiquity. We were created in the image of God, we are pure energy beings. We are celestial and divine creations. We are not merely flesh and bone, we are not animals. So I ask, do homosexual rights and women's rights create anything, build anything, or contribute anything to the betterment of society. Do these issues inspire people to colonize space, do they motivate people to build a business or provide a service to society, and do you think these issues should continue to be continuously shoved down the throat of men and women across the world daily? Do you really want to continue arguing for these cases or instead motivate your boys to become astronauts or motivate them to end all disease or discover the next generation propulsion systems or clean perpetual energy systems? Can we stop focusing on endless debates and get back to discussing the development of significant technologies. We do not need any more telephones; we don't need smart televisions, or enhanced entertainment or video games. Let"s return to what's important and what will lead mankind beyond what we ever thought possible.