Jesus Christ is more likely to be an alien than the son of God.

Thanks Pro. I. Son of God = Messiah? Pro arguments against Jesus being a son of God explicitly appear to be as follows: P1) If Jesus has not done/been X THEN he isn't messiah P2) If Jesus isn't messiah THEN he isn't a son of God P3) Jesus hasn't done/been X C) Jesus is not a son of God X - fulfilled a prophecy, born of Moses, etc. Any possible qualifier. This is a valid argument, but it is just plain unsound. All three of these premises are questionable, even if one accepts P3, then P1 & P2 remains completely unsubstantiated by Pro. There is zero reason to accept this premise and I have explicitly argued P1 is just plain false. There are many ways Jesus could have been son of God without being the messiah (he is). Pro's complaints regarding semantics are unfounded. The term 'Son' don't have to be biological at all, adopted children are a clear example of this. This even applies to inanimate things, such as Sir Tim Berners-Lee, father of the web. http://tinyurl.com... II. God the Conscious Father Pro challenges the premise: P1) All male conscious beings are sons of God Note the second argument is used to fulfil this premise, also there are an abundance of references in the OT that refer to God as the father of all conscious things (Malachi 2:10 Isaiah 63:16 Deuteronomy 32:6 to list a few). Pro's objection to the use of the NT is self-defeating as this same evidence is what Pro uses to determine Jesus is an alien. Remember the BoP is on him, so by denying the NT he shoots himself in the foot! Pro's only objection to my 2nd argument's third premise is "the theory of Abiogenesis shows how life could come from non life". Firstly, this is irrelevant. Life =/= consciousness and secondly abiogenesis is not proven and there isn't even a single hypothesis of abiogenesis! This premise is evident as no conscious being is born of an unconscious one, consciousness is always required, every human born is evidence of this. III. Alien Claims: Pro's information regarding alien capabilities have come entirely from disreputable biased unscientific sources not subject to any peer review process. According to Pro's own sources aliens continue to visit us today. Therefore the claim that we have at least 2,000 years of alien history on Earth, if true, then something, ANYTHING, resembling an alien artefact, or remnant would have been discovered. Neil Tyson provides an excellent demonstration if this in the video at 1:30-3:00. http://youtu.be... Anything worthy of scientific interest would pass through the peer review process and published in a respective journal. The following four publications are on a single lump of rock from Mars. If any comparable alien artefact was discovered, there would undoubtably be dozens of publications on it. http://tinyurl.com... http://tinyurl.com... http://tinyurl.com... http://tinyurl.com... However Pro has provided none. Nada. Zilch. Zero. We both accept that Jesus did miraculous things, we disagree on how they were performed. We have 2 possibilities: 1. They were done with advanced alien technology 2. They were done supernaturally The issue here is, it doesn't matter which one of these is true, as Jesus could still be a son if God even if 1 was true. It is made worse by the fact that #1 is so poorly supported. Furthermore Pro cites a *single* unconfirmed 40 year old radio signal, which was never repeated as evidence of this 2,000 year alien project. Sorry Pro, but you can't have your cake and eat it. Either aliens exist in abundance, or they don't. If aliens and abductions are so common, there would be many more examples. Pro's appeal to alien advancement fails, since electromagnetic waves are a fundamental force carrier, and hence inconceivably superseded. Moreover it's just ad hoc reasoning. Fermi' paradox remains a problem in SETI to this day, and we have excellent reasons to think the conditions for life are very, very rare. http://tinyurl.com...