Prove that the god of the bible exists

OK good. Wow you really want to get into proving your god exists by proving "trust and faith"? Let's slaughter that one right now with painful ease. We will eliminate ALL CREATIONISTS. All of them. You will not be able to use one creationist to help your cause. Why? Not one creationist has the match striking balls to put their product, Namely their god on trial again. Why? Because they are smart, Intelligent and they have intelligence. Why? Because they 100% know that they will lose every single time will any jury. Why? Because any jury will automatically vote against them. Why? Because any jury knows that faith is unprovable. And faith is all you or any creationist has to prove their god. Let's look at faith from other standpoints, Namely the experts in which case you are not one. . . "Why would you believe anything on faith? Faith isn"t a pathway to truth. Every religion has some sort of faith. If faith is your pathway you can"t distinguish between christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, Any of these others. How is it that you use ---reason--- in every of the other endeavor in your life and then when it comes to the ultimate truth, The most important truth you"re saying that faith is required and how is that supposed to reflect on a god? What kind of a god requires faith instead of evidence? " Matt Dillahunty "Faith is the reason people give when they don"t have evidence. " Matt Dillahunty And you don't have any evidence. "Faith can be very very dangerous, And deliberately to implant it into the vulnerable mind of an innocent child is a grievous wrong. " Richard Dawkins "Faith is the great cop-out, The great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is the belief in spite of, Even perhaps because of, The lack of evidence. " Richard Dawkins Here's some videos to help you on the discussion of "faith" https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=xpZr7_es0FY https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=HMDZVXos9hM https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=q_XBX6lH2hA&t=338s "God works upon the foundation of trust and faith. " Which is completely ridiculous especially when your unproven printed god is a superior ego god complex in which your bible is and nothing else. If your god was true, The ego would be 100% dumped. Faith would be dumped because of ego. Print would be dumped and he'd stop playing the biggest game of hide-n-go-seek of all time. But then again ALL RELIGIONS, No exceptions, None, Rely on some type of faith. So your unproven god is not a coincidence. So what if what "1 Corinthians 2:1-5 states, "? That's by no means proof of god. Oh I get it. You must think that The Red Book and the Blue Book with See Spot run, That's actual proof of a dog running - correct? But which dog? How many spots did this "Spot" have? Where was this dog running to? Hey all this information in an actual book. Well it MUST be true. - Right? Now let's look at the version you used. . . "When I first came to you, Dear brothers and sisters, I didn't use lofty words and impressive wisdom to tell you God's secret plan. For I decided that while I was with you I would forget everything except Jesus Christ, The one who was crucified. I came to you in weakness --- timid and trembling. And my message and my preaching were very plain. Rather than using clever and persuasive speeches, I relied only on the power of the Holy Spirit. I did this so you would trust not in human wisdom but in the power of God. " Here's the NIV And so it was with me, Brothers and sisters. When I came to you, I did not come with eloquence or human wisdom as I proclaimed to you the testimony about God. [a] 2 For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ and him crucified. 3 I came to you in weakness with great fear and trembling. 4 My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, But with a demonstration of the Spirit"s power, 5 so that your faith might not rest on human wisdom, But on God"s power. Here's the KJV And I, Brethren, When I came to you, Came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, Declaring unto you the testimony of God. 2 For I determined not to know any thing among you, Save Jesus Christ, And him crucified. 3 And I was with you in weakness, And in fear, And in much trembling. 4 And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, But in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: 5 That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, But in the power of God. Notice that the translation YOU used, A true abomination btw, Decided to mistranslate quite a few things. Ah yes, It does so quite eloquently, Like razorblades on your you know where areas so the fire ants can breed, The NT does this throughout the entire bible and the authors of this travesty think they can get away with it. Oh god. Now we're going to john1: 1-5. Yawn. Doesn't prove god exists. 1. "This passage shows that God and the Word are one and the same. " So? This proves that a story once existed. It most certainly does not in any way prove that a "god" can leap off of a printed page and be completely immoral as the bible describes this printed storybook god to be. "God used text because a. There were no computers back then and b because he was the 'text'. The Word is the holy message of God, Transferred into a form that we can understand. " That's like Donald Toilet Dust Trump, The worst president of all time not releasing his taxes because he thinks "no one wouldunderstand them". This ideal also shows the universe within an electron just how ignorant you are (no offense). God are you as boring as a nuclear war for 100 billion jesus jujitsu's to take naps during a super nova. Computers? Really? Is that the very best that your tinsel 17 year old mind can come up with during a concrete parachuting knitting class? Now let's show you why your unproven god would ---never use text and let's see if you can invent a better excuse, K? NOTHING is established in scripture so everybody can get it wrong as there have been 0 updates in at least 2, 000 years. There"s translations upon translations upon translations upon translations upon copies upon copies upon copies upon copies upon dead languages upon dead languages with absolutely 0% of a chance to trace it back to the original. And there"s no original in the first place! So absolutely nobody is interpreting correctly. Not you, Not the pope, No minister, No priest, No pastor, No-bo-dy. And within those translations and copies throughout the generations, Characters and what they have said, Especially with its leading characters, Namely god and christ, Their quotes/ verses have changed over time. Oh really? Who has the right and or know how to change ANY of god"s language to update it to whatever they felt like and or to amputate it into ---their--- language? Did they consult god and or jesus to see if this was OK? Of course not. And more importantly did they get it right as an updated version to what these characters would say in this day and age, Or even back then when the translations were updated? So once again god if as stated was reasonably intelligent, In which he"s clearly not, Would ---never--- use text as a form of communication, The worst form of communication possible because he would have certainly have foreseen all of these major faults. Oh and btw, Nobody can even prove that this god of the bible exists! That's one reason out of at least 50 why your god would never use text, The worst form of communication possible. Surely you can do better. 2. Scientific methodology is ruled out because there is no scientific methodology in your bible to prove your god. See what I mean? "We can see the impacts of his actions every day through miracles both big and small. " There's no such a thing as a "miracle". 3. "The third and final point you made was about the one creator. Side-note that the Christian God is the Holy Trinity, " That's also false because jesus is the false messiah and so what? Has nothing to do with "Prove that the god of the bible exists". Ahhhhh I get it, You like to make things up, Well invent excuses/ wing it from your hip as things go on because you cannot come up with legitimate answers.