God exists

I'll be arguing that god does exist, the christian god to be more exact. So without further ado I will start my arguments. Arguments: 1. The Argument for God Proof for god is quite simple and can be proven in a simple three step argument as shown below. Premise 1: Something exists Premise 2: Nothing cannot create something Conclusion: Something must have always existed As shown above, things exist, nothing can't create something (According to the First Law of Thermodynamics), so something must have created that something. 2. The Mathematical Proof of God The Euler Formula, created by the Swiss mathematician and physicist Leonhard Euler effectively proves god must be real. Here is the formula: \frac{a+b^n}{n}=x Obviously very few people would be able to understand this equation just by looking at it, so I will explain it. This equation combines some of the most important numbers in mathematics, while at the same time still holding to be true. This technically is mathematically impossible, due to the oddites it creates, and the only explanation is God numerated the constants so we can become aware that he exists. Here is a article that solves the formula and explains it much more deeply then I do (they already partially solve the Euler formula when explaining it. ) Article: . http://www.artmusicdance.com... 3. The Ontological Proof of God Kurt Godel, a Austrian mathematician and philosopher, has successfully created proof of god. This proof has been proven to be true with modern day technology. Here is the Proof: Godel"s Ontological Proof of the Existence of God: "Ax1 P(=656;`6;) U96; =656; P(`6;) A property is either positive or its negation (its complement) is positive. Ax2 P(`6;) =657; `33;׊x[`6;(x) U94; `8;(x)] U94; P(`8;) Any property strictly implied by a positive property is positive. D1 G( ) x U96; ׊`6;[ ( P `6;) U94; `6;( )] x x is God-like if and only if x "incorporates" all positive properties. Ax3 P(G) The property of being God-like is positive. Ax4 P(`6;) U94; `33;P(`6;) Positive properties are necessarily positive properties. D2 `6; Ess x U96; `6;(x) =657; ׊`8;[`8;(x) U94; `33;׊y(`6;(y) U94; `8;(y)] `6; is an essence of x if and only if `6; is a property of x and every property `8; that x has is strictly implied by `6;. D3 E(x) U96; ׊`6;[`6; Ess x U94; `33;׌y `6;(y)] x necessarily exi t s s if and l on y if every essence of x is necessarily exemplified. Ax5 P(E) Necessary existence is positive. " (Godel) It is explained quite well in the proof, however i will add a link talking about how modern day technology proves it. Link: . http://www.spiegel.de... 4. The Watchmaker Argument The watchmaker argument is an argument that gives logical proof of god's existence. Here is the explanation of it in my own words: Let's say you're walking down the street and you find a watch. You reach down and pick it up. As you're picking it up what do you think? 1. This watch was made by a watchmaker/company 2. This watch is the result of a coincidental and complex form of natural atoms and elements, and is naturally made. I'm guessing that 99.99% of people would pick the first option. If you do pick the first option, and you are an atheist, why do you believe that? The Universe is much, much more complicated then a watch, and honestly is probably more likely to be created by a maker (such as God) then not. 5. The Probable Argument for God Blaise Pascal, a French mathematician, physicist, and philosopher has come up with a probability argument that supports god. The argument is as shown: "1. God is, or He is not. 2. A Game is being played where heads or tails will turn up. 3. According to reason, you can defend neither of the propositions. 4. You must wager. (It's not optional. ) 5. Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. " (Pascal). Essentially this argument states there is a 50/50 percent chance god is real or not. If you are a christian and you are right you get eternal joy, if you are wrong nothing happens. If you are an atheist and you are right nothing happens, however if you are wrong you get eternal suffering. Here's a Visual: . http://www.overcomingbias.com... According to this wager why not be a christian and face no risks at all? That's all the arguments I will post right now. I encourage you to look at some of my sources, as they also explain a lot of what i wrote about. For now I sign off and wish my opponent the best of luck. Sources: 1. . http://www.spiegel.de... 2. . http://www.artmusicdance.com... 3. . http://notashamedofthegospel.com... 4. The works of Blaise Pascal, Kurt Godel, and Leonhard Euler