Hitler has other attributes besides his racism than should be considered more often

Ok so to start with so this isn't confusing for anyone to read heres a brief road map: On case (essentially refutations to pros arguments) 1. Divine cause in life/ protection of Germany 2. Religionist, communist, and philosphyist not racist Off case (building of the con arguments) 1. The consideration of culture 2. Fruit of the poison tree ON CASE ARGUMENTS: 1.Divine purpose: Ok so what my opponent has presented here can basically be summed up in about a sentence or two (Im not trying to misrepresent or simplify the argument this is only meant to clarify). Hitler attempted to exterminate multiple racial/ethinc groups to protect Germany and the racism was only an "underlying' piece of this what they claim to be a large puzzle. We can see that this simply is not true through numerous lenses. The first and most important is historical interoperation. If we look back at all of the actions that Hitler took the majority of them were for racist reasons meaning the reasons that he reaped many of the befits from his actions is because he was racist to begin with so if you boil it all down he is really nothing more then a racist. If we can just turn our eyes toward a few of hitlers own quotes about saving Germany for a second "Humanitarianism is the expression of stupidity and cowardice." Adolf Hitler "By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a people see even heaven as hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise." Adolf Hitler He was all about establishing new racially pure country. It had nothing to do with actual wanting for Germany to be more powerful it had everything to do with that he was willing to d anything to make it seem like he wasn"t trying to exterminate an entire race. 2. Religionist, Philosphist, and communist hater not racist So My opponent has tried to claim here that being jewish is not a race they even have the audacity to sight the JewFaq.org. The appalling part of this is, that the quote my opponent is using here is completely out of context. The author is simply trying to state theta jews dontt refer to them selves as a racial group BECAUSE of the awful memories and connotations with the holocaust that it brings up. "The idea of Jews as a race brings to mind nightmarish visions of Nazi Germany, where Jews were declared to be not just a race, but an inferior race that had to be rounded up into ghettos and exterminated like vermin.ï¿½(2)literally this states that Hitler thought the Jewish people were in fact race thus he was being a livid racist when he exterminate them. If you still don't buy that quote heres one from one of hitlers most famous books Mein Kampf "The Jew has always been a people with definite racial characteristics and never a religion.(1) Therefore it was a racial motivated act to exterminate them it really had nothing to do with protection that was all part of the propaganda. Ok so the next piece of this argument was basically that the actions that he took against communists and against Marxists were not racially based whatsoever. So theres a basic flaw in this kind of argumentation it basically relies upon the assumption that hitler was not in fact racist whatsoever which even my opponent has cons cite dot that he was a racist and did take some pretty serious actions based on his rascism. That being said my opponent is trying to claim that he may have been racist but he was more then racist this leads me directly to one of own contentions which i have tag lined as fruit of the poisonous tree. I really would like to cross apply this into my off case arguments but I am not sure everyone will catch that so ill do a pretty quick explanation here and expand on it in my off case: Basically if the idea stemmed from racsim it is a racist action, i know this doesn't seem like it makes a lot of sense now but please allow me to expand in my off case. OFF CASE: 1. Fruit of the poisonous tree: Because I"m running out of characters (and time) ill try and make this short and sweet. This is essentially a legal argument that states that anything that stems from something cannot be used by it. Ok so ill explain this and how it proves my case true today. If we look at hitlers early life we see that he expressed raceism at a young age thus every action he took stemmed directly from his hatred for any race that wasn"t his own. We also see that all of his cations were not ammbitious they were just plain racist. I rest my case if it stems from the root of racism it is racist. 2. Consideration of culture: we need to consider that race is sessionally culture. My opponent through out their entire cases simply say that Judaism is not a race. It is and I have proved that to you today by hitlers own definition. Many of my offensive arguments were touched on in the rebuttal of the affirmative case so please carry those across. Thank you of reading have a great night! Sources: 1- Mein Kampf 2- http://www.jewfaq.org... 3-http://wcdebate.com... 4. http://idebate.org...