The Bible is not inerrant

First, I find this intriguing, thank you for giving me some food for thought as I was not expecting these at all. :) The number of fighting men in Israel"And Joab gave the sum of the numbering of the people to the king: in Israel there were 800,000 valiant men who drew the sword, and the men of Judah were 500,000" -2 Samuel 24:9 (ESV)"And Joab gave the sum of the numbering of the people to David. In all Israel there were 1,100,000 men who drew the sword, and in Judah 470,000 who drew the sword." -1 Chronicles 21:5 (ESV)I will give you that both numbers are different though I will provide a solution to the varience in numbers. In the first recording shown above (2 Samuel 24:9) it says that 800,000 valiant men who drew the sword were recorded. The valiant men are veterans who have fought in wars before and are seasoned, whereas in the second recording (1 Chronicles 21:5) 1,100,000 men who drew the sword were recording, meaning that the other 300,000 men had not seen war before, but knew how to use a weapon. In the first recording (2 Samuel 24:9) there were 500,000 men recorded in Judah while in the second recording (1 Chronicles 21:5) there were 470,000 men in Judah who drew the sword, meaning men who were able to use the sword, which means the other 30,000 men were incapable of using a sword because of being too old or young men who just didn't know how (Though I feel as though the second isn't so plausible since weilding a sword was important, then)The place of Josiah's death"In his days Pharaoh Neco king of Egypt went up to the king of Assyria to the river Euphrates. King Josiah went to meet him, and Pharaoh Neco killed him at Megiddo, as soon as he saw him. And his servants carried him dead in a chariot from Megiddo and brought him to Jerusalem and buried him in his own tomb. And the people of the land took Jehoahaz the son of Josiah, and anoited him, and made him king in his father's place. -2 Kings 23:29-30 (ESV)"And the archers shot king Josiah. And the king said to his servants 'Take me away, for I am badly wounded.' So his servants took him out of the chariot and brought him to Jerusalem. And he died and was buried in the tombs of his fathers. All Judah and Jerusalem mourned for Josiah." -2 Chronicles 35:23-24 (ESV)This one can also be explained. Please consult the bold print in the first verse (2 Kings 23:29-30) the Pharaoh Neco did indeed kill Josiah when they met in Megiddo, as soon as he saw him, but this does not mean that he died immediately. Josiah had the breath to command his servants to take him away, and he did indeed die, though it was not specified where he died (In Jerusalem or Megiddo) even so Pharaoh Neco would have killed him even if he died in Jerusalem or Megiddo due to the fact that it was the wound inflicted by the Pharaoh that brought king Josiah to death. Neither verse specifically states that Josiah was dead in Megiddo OR Jerusalem, but that Neco administered the final blow that would kill king Josiah.The angelic appearance before the women"And behold, there was a great earthquake, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled back the stone and sat on it."-Matthew 28:2 (ESV)"And entering the tomb, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, dressed in a white robe, and they were alarmed."-Mark 16:5 (ESV)"But when they went in they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus. While they were perplexed about this, behold, two men stood by them in dazzling apparel.Luke 24:3-4 (ESV) There is no Luke 28 so I assumed that this is the verse that you meant."And she saw two angels in white, sitting where the body of Jesus had lain, one at the head and one at the feet." -John 20:12 (ESV)Matthew 28:2 is merely describing what an angel did BEFORE the women arrived. Also, this angel invites the women inside the tomb (Matthew 28:6) Which is where they encounter the two angels inside the tomb.Mark 16:5 & Luke 24:3-4. These two were in the same event though in Mark one angel is described, while in Luke two angels are described. This is explained by the fact that different people described the same event. There were more than one eye witness to this event, one eye witness merely mentioned only one angel, while another mentioned that there were two. Neither are wrong, but both are right. One just happened to think it was more important to mention just one angel, while the other felt it was more important to mention that there were two angels inside of this tomb. John 20:12 describes a second visit to the tomb between Mary Magdalene and two angels, this was AFTER the women had gone to fetch the disciples to see that Jesus was gone, so this is a different event entirely from the other three books.Comments:Very good, I'm liking this so far. Thank you for giving well thought out questions. :)