only personal physical experience of now is real

DISCLAIMER: I am a person that believes in respecting the person I am debating no matter what there stance is. If you are reading this please vote for me so that I can have someone better to debate. I have tried my best not to insult the other side but at this point its like I am just getting gibberish back as a rebuttal. I am annoyed and it shows* "everything and nothing is defined by experience, singularity is the opposite of humanity" The universe as a whole cares very little about your personal experience. Singularity is not the opposite of humanity. Unless you don"t believe your human "if you perceive it you experience it" I already covered my agreement with you "that is a belief, they can not actually read the words, i know logic, therefore i know i can reason, there is no logic in fantasy so there is no knowing cause and effect in my imagination" What is a belief? Who are they? The first two statements don't connect to anything else in this. Fantasy is perfectly logical. It is the human brains way of brainstorming, copping with stress, and bringing subconscious thoughts to the conscious mind. "if i am in a simulation, there is nothing to simulate, where as because i can simulate something, means there is true and false, so something is real" A simulation is fantasy and you just argued against there being fantasy. Now your are arguing that fantasy proves reality. I cant debate if you pick both sides of an issue. "on a higher level, the future is possible, so i know i am in my imagination when i cant imagine anything" On what higher level are talking about? If you cant imagine anything then your not in your imagination. This is like saying I know I am in my car because I am not inside it. "the past is impossible because you can never experience it again, and reality is absolute which means there is no other option, so that includes impossible, therefore its impossible for you to close your eyes and read these words on the screen" I am not even going to touch your comments on the past. You did just just prove my argument though. My last rebuttal claimed you can experience that you can see through your eye lids but that is not possible so your experience is not reality. "imagination is false, you cant imagine reality, so cause and effect doesn't apply, its a simulation, reason, the concept of logic, it might be true that its happening in your false imagination thou" There is no sentence or statements in this section. This is 6 parts of statements smashed together in a unreadable format. "the only effect in your imagination is emotion caused by your thoughts, if what happened in your imagination was true you should die when you jump off a cliff and splatter on the ground" You then you agree that things that happen in your head are not necessarily real again proving my side correct. "only the time of now is real, the future and past dosnt matter, and matter is space and space is time, like air." OK this states that everything is time like air. WHAT?!?! "there is no reality in the past, neither in the future, to say 5 seconds ahead of now is real is saying 5 seconds ahead of reality is real, as i have to imagine it" Couldn't you not imagine anything for 5 seconds? "know=physical experience of now, and know is no other option" seeing with your physical eyes is knowing, you have 5 senses, and there is no other option for you then to look at these words on the screen with your eyes if that is your only option, THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION, absolute, so its impossible for you to read on till the end of this message with your eyes closed" You you yet again agree that things that happen in your head are not necessarily real again proving my side correct. "belief is the opposite of knowledge, know is the balancing point between belief and knowledge, true is the opposite of false and truth, 0 and 1 belief=False=future know=true=now knowledge=truth=past" This says Truth=past/now Know/ledge=true truth false= future belief. Leaves me wondering how that means anything. "its true i am here now, so i must have gotten here somehow, and the future is unknown" What is true? Well you just argued you didn"t get here somehow because that the past and it never happened. "i was stating my opinion when saying hospitals are necessary, i think they are, i like em! :)" What does that have to do with the nature of reality? natural is necessary What does that have to do with the nature of reality? an effect that wasn't caused has no effect, anything else is a lie What does that have to do with the order they happen? particles, atoms, the world, galaxies, a universe, all imaginary, not real The debate was centered around you making an argument that that is true. I really have no idea how this nonsensical argument that I you just randomly state unconnected things getting you to that goal, or how switching to my side of the debate does.