Muslims, please prove these videos wrong!

In the name of Allah, Most Gracious Most Merciful.Con is continuously saying I have not Proved the Video wrong..Whereas Video claimed that Muslims have moon as their sign thats why they use moon in their flags.1. I Refuted it with sufficient Proof.2. I Exposed the Video where it is Misquoting and deceiving people by show Incident of WAR as a Normal Command.3. I Exposed the video saying that Allah has no Definition.4. I Exposed the Video is an "Ipsi Dixit" it have no supported evidence with what it is saying.5. I Proved that Allah is Elohim as in Bible also.6. I Exposed the Video saying that the statue is Allah moon god but Archaeologist have an Opposite Belief and They do not at all belief that it is a moon god. any Lets Move Ahead.Does Muhammad Really said KILL NON-MUSLIMS WHEREVER YOU FIND THEM?:(Video's Claim)C1:i) VIDEO HAS QOUTED the "Half Verse"ii) VIDEO HAS QOUTED "Out of Context"Let us see what the verse is about.Quran clearly states there is No Compulsion in Religion! as stated in Verse 2:256! If you read the verse fully and the verse following the one you quote, you will realize that Islam is the most peaceful and forgiving religion.Chapter 9, verses , 5 & 6:4. As for those who have honoured the treaty you made with them and who have not supported anyone against you: fulfill your agreement with them to the end of their term. God loves those who are righteous.5. But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.6. If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum(He may convert or not!), grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah. and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are men without knowledge.Do you see the problems when people quote the verse out of context? But would any Army Commander in any day and age have said anything similar to verse no. 6"BUT, if one should seek asylum grant it AND ESCORT HIM TO A PLACE OF SAFETY!" SubhanAllah, these are Allah's great Words. Don't you see the mercy, peace and security emanating from these words?Hence VIDEO IS AGAIN MISQOUTING!C2. My Con Still denied that Allah is same as in Bible... Let us see the BibleGateWay.comWhat can be a Better Proof for a Christian then His Own Bible?Please ask your all the Arabic priests to Throw away the Arabic Bible It contains Allah "الله" more then 2000 times... [John 3:16 - Arabic Bible] Allah appears in Holy Bible more then 2000 Times... instead of Elohim also!Hence Proving! Allah is Same as Elohim!Is Allah Baal or HuBaal? Please Note Down My Genius Pro have Again Plagiarized from the following Link http://www.biblebelievers.org.au... a 100 times refuted article written by Dunkin and othersFirst from My Con Plagiarized that person is deluded between Baal & Hubaal! But I will Clear it in the argument (3)According to Dunkin Baal was a Foreign Arab God which was brought and Named Hubaal while converting the name This non-sense is again and again copy pasted as several websites...Let me Tear it Apart!I hope My Con will not refuse what is Fellow Western Historians and Archaeologist say about what He claims from Non-Muslim Books of Narrations: The statements of Prophet MuhP3;ammad and Abu Sufyan. Ibn Hisham narrates in the biography of the Prophet:When Abu Sufyan wanted to leave he went to the top of the mountain and shouted loudly saying, 'You have done a fine work; victory in war goes by turns. Today in exchange for the day (of Badr). Show your superiority, Hubaal,' i.e. vindicate your religion. The apostle told ‘Umar to get up and answer him and say, God [Allah] is most high and most glorious. We are not equal. Our dead are in paradise; your dead are in hell. (4) 'Abu Sufyan ascended a high place and said, "Is Muhammad present amongst the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abu Sufyan said, "Is the son of Abu Quhafa present among the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abu Sufyan said, "Is the son of Al-Khattab amongst the people?" He then added, "All these people have been killed, for, were they alive, they would have replied." On that, 'Umar could not help saying, "You are a liar, O enemy of Allah! Allah has kept what will make you unhappy." Abu Sufyan said, "Superior may be Hubaal!" On that the Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They asked, "What may we say?" He said, "Say: Allah is More Elevated and More Majestic!" Abu Sufyan said, "We have (the idol) al-‘Uzza, whereas you have no ‘Uzza!" The Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They said, "What may we say?" The Prophet said, "Say: Allah is our Helper and you have no helper." (4) one can see clear facts emerging. Firstly, the Quraysh worshipped Hubal and al-F3;Uzza (among other deities not stated here); the Muslims, on the other hand, worshipped Allah. Secondly, with regard to the statement of Abu Sufyan ascribing superiority to Hubal, Prophet MuhP3;ammad replied that Allah was more Majestic and more Glorious. Thirdly, the dead of the pagan Quraysh in the Battle of Uhud who worshipped Hubal, al-F3;Uzza among other gods are in the hell, whereas the dead who worshipped Allah are in heaven. Fourthly, the worshippers of Allah are not equal to the worshippers of Hubal. Since the Christian missionaries have a habit of using a syllogism even though there are clear statements refuting their position, let us note the following syllogism. Hubal or Baal was worshipped by the Pagans ; Allah was worshipped by the Muslims. The worshippers of Baal are in hell; the worshippers of Allah are in heaven. Therefore, Baal was not Allah. (4) Over 100 years ago, Margoliouth had casted doubts on Wellhausen's the originator of Hypothesis in identification of Hubal with Allah and dismissed it as a "hypothesis". He says:"Between Hubal or Baal , the god whose image was inside the Ka‘bah, and Allah ("the God"), of whom much will be heard, the identification of the two suggested by Wellhausen is not yet more than an hypothesis." Patricia Crone made an argument concerning Wellhausen's suggestion that Allah might simply be another name for Hubal. Commenting on the Islamic tradition she says:One would have to fall back on the view that Allah might simply be another name for Hubal, as Wellhausen suggested; just as the Israelites knew Yahwe as Elohim, so the Arabs knew Hubal as Allah, meaning "God". It would follow that the guardians of Hubal and Allah were identical; and since Quraysh were not guardians of Hubal, they would not be guardians of Allah, If Hubal and Allah had been one and the same deity, Hubal or Baal ought to have survived as an epithet of Allah, which he did not. And moreover there would not have been traditions in which people are asked to renounce the one for the other(5) Crone further reinforces her position by saying,But as has been seen, they [Quraysh] do not appear to have been guardians of Hubal, and Hubal was not identified with Allah nor did his cult assist that of Allah in any way.(6) Similarly, while discussing Hubal or baal and Allah in the context of the Battle of Uhud, Hayward R. Alker points out that they both can't be one and the same.This seems, however, unlikely, especially as, at the battle of Uhud, in the course of the warfare between Quraysh of Mecca and Muslims of Medina, the clash between the Meccans' god Hubal or baal and the Muslims' Allah is stressed. F. E. Peters makes a clear distinction between Hubal and Allah on the basis that the former was a newcomer and the Quraysh adopted Hubal to further their political alliance with the surrounding tribe of Kinana.Or, to put the question more directly, was Hubal rather than Allah "Lord of the Ka‘ba"? Probably not, else the Quran, which makes no mention of Hubal, would certainly have mentioned the contention. Hubal was, by the Arabs' own tradition, a newcomer to both Mecca and Ka‘ba, an outsider introduced by the ambitious ‘Amr ibn Luhayy and the tribal token around which the Quraysh later attempted to construct a federation with the surrounding Kinana, whose chief deity Hubal was. Hubal was introduced into the Ka‘ba but he never supplanted the god Allah, whose House it continued to be. HENCE ALLAH IS NOT BAAL OR HUBAAL(all other argument is out of context of debate)How Ignorant My Pro is can be seen by this.. In previous debate I proved Him that Wine of Heaven is Different from Wine of Earth but He have COPY PASTED The WHOLE ARTICLE so That also came in it.it is clear that earthly wine has a character of not only intoxicating the person but to make him commit Sins! In gardens of felicity, facing each other on thrones, round will be passed a cup from a clear flowing fountain, crystal white, of a taste delicious to those who drink thereof,"Free from headiness; Nor will they suffer intoxication therefrom". [Quran 37:43-47]Hence Its a Better Drink not as Earthly Wine.http://www.youtube.com...The video1 is a Fine Answer that Quran's Description of Paradise.CONCLUSION:1. Con Agrees what I said in Previous Argument2. I have Refuted Strongest and Base Arguments of Video that Its BIG BIG Claims are false and Fake according to Historians hence all the video is fake!3. Con's Video have no Source5. Con Plagiarized whole article. not even cared to format it properly and is Out of Context in the end. Debate was about Video6. Con is Liar and Fake7. He has not refuted any of My points that means he agrees with them HenceVIDEO IS FAKE WITH NOT SUPPORTING EVIDENCE AND CON HAS PAGARAIZED ALL NOT EVEN CARE TO FORMAT IT SIMPLE COPY PASTE. HE DOES NOT EVEN READ WHAT I WROTE.VOTE WITH JUSTICE. ALL REFERENCE: http://refabcdef.blogspot.com...