Nuclear power Vs Natural Gas

extend arguments. ~rebuttals~~Chernobyl~Actually, this is not a good argument. The reactor was old, and the goverment put in place inadequate workers. [1, 2] The reasons it failed:1. A poor soviet design2. age3. poor trained workers. [1]In today's nuclear world, all of the workers in these plants are highly knowledgeable people and get training, and also better designs has prevented these accidents. No accident like Chernobyl has happened since better designs and better workers came to be, hence all newer plants have very little chance of this accident. [1] All personnel of a nuclear power plant in the US know what to do in these situations. [3]~Terrorism and bombs~My opponent claims that if we use nuclear power terrorists will become workers and obtain this weaponry. This would be hard to do. All personnel in these facilities must get federal licenses to work in these plants. [4] All employes also must get rigorous background checks and other history before they can obtain access to the plant. [4] Almost everyone who does through the plant is escorted, and only a select few get the privilege, of being alone [4] Also the plant has many guards and other security measures preventing people from breaking in. [5] The NRC has very high standards in security to prevent terrorist attacks. [5] It is very hard to break into a plant, without being shot or stopped. [5]Now, so make a nuclear weapon you need enriched uranium. As I stated last round, the uranium in these plants is only enriched by 5%. The uranium in these nuclear lants can only make controlled reactions. [6] In some cases it is only enriched 0.7%. [6]The point about a terrorist problem is essentially false. ~Government sponsorship~Um, goverment sponsorship does not make it illogical. Solar, wind, and oil all get goverment money here and there, yet are still widely used. I do not see how the government sponsoring them is bad, it is actually good. This means our goverment thinks this technology is safe, and has benefits. So if anything the sponsorship is good. Also in all reality, fossil fuels get more money then green energies like nuclear plants. [7] The goverment actually cleans up spills from gas plants. [8] The NRC does inspect the plants, and will fix the parts, but the nuclear industry itself would have to pay if there was a spill. [9, 10]----> Conclusion <----I have disproved my opponents arguments and proven his arguments false. His case revolved around the assumption that nuclear power is unsafe, this is a myth and I have proven it. He has not even tried to refute my case, and I have proven for a FACT, not an assumption that natural gas causes cancer through pollutants and the fracking causes water pollution. I also proved per kilowatt hour nuclear is cheaper and pollutes less grams of CO2 and other gases, unlike natural gas. Nuclear is ALL fields is superior to natural gas. I urge a PRO vote.Sources:http://www.world-nuclear.org... [1] http://en.wikipedia.org... [2]http://www.nei.org... [3]http://www.nei.org... [4]http://www.nei.org... [5]http://www.nrc.gov... [6]http://www.time.com... [7]http://www.dec.ny.gov... [8]http://www.nrc.gov... [9]http://www.world-nuclear.org... [10]