BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The Sabbath has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ

PRO is claiming that observation of the Sabbath is no longer required, because Jesus fulfilled the law. The topic of this debate is something I have not debated before, so I am eager to get this underway. Shabbat I first want to take slight issue with PRO’s definition of Shabbat, in case it becomes important later. While the word “shabbat” does indeed mean “rest,” the use of the capitalized version suggests it is being used to refer to the actual “Jewish day of rest” [1], not simply rest in general. Olam Next, I would like to clarify PRO’s discussion regarding the Hebrew word “olam. ” PRO is right that the word CAN mean “a really long time,” but it can also mean forever [2]. Therefore, we must determine which usage was used in Exodus 31:16 when God ordered the Israelites to observe the Sabbath. The particular usage of the word is determined by the context. As this is a command from God, and God is eternal, the commandment is eternal. In this case, “olam” means “forever” [2]. Fulfilling the Law What does it mean to fulfill the law? When one “fulfills the law,” at least when referring to the Torah, it means to observe, or to follow the law [3]. Therefore, when Jesus says in Matthew 5:17 that he has come to fulfill the law, not to abolish the law, he clearly means that he will follow the law, not that he will end it. This thought is strengthened in the next verse where he goes on to state that the law will remain “until heaven and earth disappear” [4]. Changing the Law The Torah is very clear, that the law cannot be added to or subtracted from [5]. Therefore, even if Jesus was saying that certain parts of the law were no longer in effect, he would not be able to do so. To do so would make him a false prophet [6]. Bringing it All Together PRO has claimed that the law requiring observation of the Sabbath is no longer in effect, because Jesus has fulfilled the law. This is incorrect because the law is from God, and therefore eternal. The laws cannot be changed. Also, when one fulfills the law, it simply means that they were followed, not that they were in any way ended, or made obsolete. Sources: [1] . http://en.wikipedia.org... [2] . http://www.studylight.org... [3] . http://www.beingjewish.com... [4] . https://www.biblegateway.com... [5] . http://www.chabad.org... [6] . http://www.aish.com...
The Sabbath has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ

I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience. I will begin this final round by addressing the one point PRO brought up, and then move on to a short recap of the debate. Dropped Argument? PRO has accused me of not addressing what Paul wrote in the book of Colossians. Unfortunately, PRO is mistaken. The point is that Paul told the congregation in Colossae that they did not have to observe the Sabbath. I addressed this point indirectly in the second round when I pointed out that the Mosaic Law (including the Sabbath) was an eternal commandment, and that if Jesus were to instruct his followers not to follow the law, he would be considered a false prophet. I then addressed the point directly in the following round when I pointed out that Paul could not have abolished the Sabbath, as he didn’t have the authority to change a command from a God. Wrapping Up PRO has conceded that the Mosaic Law is still in effect, which then makes his argument lay squarely on the argument that Paul said the Sabbath need not be observed. However, I have shown that Paul could not have eliminated the requirement to observe the Sabbath, as it is an eternal commandment from God. PRO began this debate with a burden to prove that observation of the Sabbath “is no longer an applicable Torah commandment. ” I have not only shown how each of his arguments fail, but I also showed that the requirement to keep the Sabbath is a never ending divine commandment, even though I had no burden to do anything but rebut PRO’s points.
The Sabbath has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ

The Old LawI would like begin by pointing out that PRO has conceded that the Mosaic Law has not been replaced. If the New Covenant did not replace the Mosaic Law, then it is still in effect, including Exodus 20:8 where the Israelites were instructed to observe the Sabbath. PaulI would like to reply to PRO’s comments regarding Paul’s words in Romans 5 by restating my point from the previous round. Paul has no authority to countermand a command from God. Also, even if we accept Paul’s words in Romans, we are simply accepting that Jesus fulfilled the law. As I pointed out (and PRO did not address), in round 2, to fulfill the law is to follow it, not to end it. Therefore, even if we accept that Jesus fulfilled the law, it does not mean that the law is still in effect. Wrapping UpPRO has conceded that the Mosaic Law has never been replaced. This in itself tells us that the commandments regarding the Sabbath are still in effect. Also, Paul’s words regarding Jesus fulfilling the law mean nothing since to fulfill the law does not end the law. PRO has yet to demonstrate that observing the Sabbath is no “no longer an applicable Torah commandment.
Quack science debate

Since you didn't choose any of the 3, i will choose one for you. SAY HELLO TO QUACK SCIENCE OF GMOLOGY. Acording to whale.to Jerry Rosman, a pig farmer in Iowa, was cultivating GMO corn,(Roundup Ready and BT) and fed this corn to his pigs. LOOK AT THAT SOLID PROOF THAT GMOS ARE BADDDD. And also according to whale.to GMOS ARE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. ALL THEY DO IS POISON YOU TO DEATH AND MAKE MONEY OFF OF YOU. (WHICH IS THE BEST MARKETING STRATEGY EVVER) THE ONLY REASON THEY AREN'T BANNED IS BECAUSE MONASTO PAYS OFF EVERY GOVERMENT (WHICH ALLOWS GMOS. KEEP GOING AFRICA! LISTEN TO GREENPEACE), EVERY SINGLE HEALTH RESEARCHER, EVERY SINGLE SCIENTIST, THE THE GENERAL CONSENSUS, AND EVERYONE WITH AN IQ ABOVE 100. Also, according to naturalnews.com, a GMO researcher advocates INFANTICIDE. My amazing ad hominen attack defeats every single one of your arguments. And they say GMO's cause CANCER. CAAAANNNCCEERRR. (even though cancer rates remain the same, they are like that because of Miso soup!!) LOOK, GMOOOSS ARE BADDDD. THEY CAUSE CANCER AND A LOT OF THINGS I AM TO LAZY TP BACK UP MYSELF. AND GMOS CAUSE SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME AND WHEREWOLF SYNDROME. BAN GMOS NOWWWWWWWW
Golden Goose the sleeves

Me thinks the Golden Goose doth delve in twists and turns and subtle mimicry. Golden treads the beast whose legs doth flounder in strappy disarray. Lopez and Zanotti. Oh protagonists of the hike. Hem hike high, in high end sneaker performance and sleeveless abandonment. Felted pleasure bathed in frothy delight, rubbed and cajoled to splendid felted climax. In all excellence of literal exposure and emotional rapture, woolly fingers rubbing. The blog, the magazine, the programme. Media anticipation doth excite the photojournalist. Whose travel and talk elicits Golden Goose Glory. Golden Goose Gratification. $325. Pah. A mere trifle. Oh trifle delight of sherry and custard exuberance flaunting. Can those specialist scissors, cut the cream and jelly of such a Golden Goose Delight. Let's cut to the chase and not pander to the whims of fatted calved and short sleeved siren. Whose luscious song doth haunt Zanotti's fragile chair. And sing out loud to Fele Corp pomposity. Such overwhelming design extravagance and panache. And marvel at the technological fantasy. Oh Golden goose Dream. Oh Golden Goose Gall.
Golden Goose the sleeves

While some analysts suggest KSwiss must do well in Europe to maintain its sterling growth, Nichols disagrees. "Yes, the U. S. [b][url=http://www.goldengoosebaskets.fr...]Golden Goose[/url][/b] Dark wash goes with everything and it will look a little more modern but not so young because that's one thing you don't want to look is too young. You don't want to look like you are trying too hard to look younger. So you can do that by using color, pattern, texture. Take an old shirt and transform it into a flirty top with this inexpensive project. All you need is some lace trim and an afternoon of handstitching. This tutorial starts off with a sleeveless shirt, but you can also use a Tshirt by cutting off the sleeves. Not holding back, Lopez hikes up her hem and extends her leg onto Zanotti's chair so he could help her put on the strappy boots. These were too loose in the calf. "My legs are really skinny therebut some people have bigger legs," she says. Really. This may seem obvious, but being a model really means exposing yourself in both a literal and emotional way. This isn't just a feature of stereotypical female models, but of everyone. The term travel photographer can often mean a lot of things, and in many cases it just means a photojournalist who stays on the move internationally. Often times what we think of as a travel photographer is defined by the "travel" oriented publications and shows that we have that talk visiting different locations. Travel blogs, magazines, television programs, and other media are meant to show different areas and what elements a traveler may want about those locations. The first GPS sneakers were marketed by the Fele Corporation in 2007 and retailed for $325. They were the sneakers that got trashed in [b][url=http://www.goldengoosebaskets.fr...]Golden Goose Pas Cher[/url][/b] the press. Only a few hiking and travel websites took them seriously. Needle and heavyduty thread Pen and paper for patterning Scissors One to two felted wool sweatersFelt is wool fibers that have been locked [b][url=http://www.goldengoosebaskets.fr...]Golden Goose Basket Pas Cher[/url][/b] together. This is accomplished by rubbing wool together with soap and hot water. So when a sweater in the washing machine it becomes felt. http://www.goldengooseworld.com... https://lovesvalentino.wordpress.com... http://www.goldengoosesneakershop.com...
Ninja are better than pirates

I agree with the skill that ninjas have that they are very well trained in the art of being assassins. However in round 2 I very briefly mentioned Somali pirates, they were there as fillers, I am sorry if my transition of the skills of Somali pirates and 15th century pirates was unclear (I am a 14 year old I have much to learn in writing well), but my main point was blowing up a ship as a ninja or anybody (by ship I mean frigate) is loud and hard to do stealthy. As for the idea of running around crazy as a ninja with stolen C4 the ninja has very little idea on how to use them much less guns with a safety on them and magezines. The main point of the debate is to prove whether ninja are better than pirates. As far as I am concerned even with the ninja's skill of disguise people can easy detect when a person doesn't do something they would normally do ( a pirate who walks around the deck of a ship who doesn't talk or has a Asian accent is a little suspicious), also (I assume) you perceive pirates as more or less dumb or have no ability in realizing something is wrong. Pirates are people as well as ninjas, ninjas have several skills but in a confrontation it is almost impossible to tell who would win. I come back to what I said in round 1, "the reason why someone wins is because either the ninja is more skilled than the pirate or vice versa." It is impossible just based on possible facts that apply to all ninjas or pirates in what would happen unless you take in to account specific people with the skills we have talked about. The reason why I haven't done so is because you mentioned in round 1 to leave specific arguments out. So if you always assume ninja successfully in kill their opponent with stealth and silent weapons and become undetectable they appear to only achieve kills with surprise. Pirates are then superior to ninja because they expect to fight out in the open against a Spanish frigate, on the deck of a boat, or on land. Since ninjas always do stealth kills successfully Pirates have the skill of always killing opponents immediately when detected, and the chance of them doing so is very high considering they have enough flintlock guns to kill 5 people on them all the time. Finally if you assume when you created the debate if ninja are better then pirates, you meant that in every possible combat situation pirates ( 15th century pirates) have a higher chance of winning because of their flexibility in the way they fight. Anyway I just want to say it was fun debating with you regardless of whether I'm right or you are, it was fun debating about an interesting topic with another equally brilliant person on my first debate on this website, and so I bid you good day. -Jonathan
Ninja are better than pirates

With all due respect, you seem to be placing all your eggs in the Somalian pirate basket, however, the 10th part of Ninjutsu, 変#013;"899; (disguise and impersonation) At night, ninja could use the ladder of a ship or even a makibish tied to a rope to get onto the ship, slay a pirate using one of the many silent weapons in a ninja's arsenal and use the burka of the pirate to roam to ship without detection. There are many options from here; Get a machine gun and go crazy, find the C4, mortars etc. that you mentioned and trigger them. Better yet, combine the two for ultimate destruction. You could also just wear a burka when boarding the ship to further decrease the chance of detection. They could also darken their skin to decrease the chance of detection. I think it's apparent that ninjas are superior to pirates, as I have countered all of your main points.
Ninja are better than pirates

You make a good point about the training of pyrotechnics and water training for ninjas. However there is a flaw in your idea of a ninja planting a bomb, if a ninja is planting a bomb based on gunpowder after swimming the powder is wet. The gunpowder would not explode if you lit it , you could assume its some kind of fire/napalm like weapon but how does a ninja have the ability of creating fire when swimming through water. Another answer could be the ninja somehow creates fire to set off the charge however the boat is wet, so the ninja uses oil to light the fire the other problem is the pirates on guard notice a huge portion of the ship is on fire and people evacuate. If this is a Somali pirate boat the explosive may not break the hull if it is reinforced, also Somali pirates are as cautious as regular pirates which means they have guards on the boat and around the boat because they are "paranoid" about people killing them. A problem with explosives I forgot to mention is, if the gunpowder is carried to the boat and is dry how much did the ninja bring? To break a boat or make a big hole you need quite a bit of gunpowder, its not C4, you need barrels of the stuff to blow a large hole in a frigate. A second problem is if the ninja brings barrels of gun powder to the boat that is noticeable and pirates would see it, and if the charge is set off it makes a loud noise and when pirates hear a loud noise they expect trouble and they are prepared to get up and react quick to the problem at hand. Again if these are Somali pirates several huge barrels floating towards them are noticeable and they will take action in getting rid of them safely, they have much better detection of moving objects in water with radar then 15th century pirates do. One final reason why a bomb isn't the best option is even if the bomb blows a huge hole in the ship the pirates on watch alert the sleeping pirates and they swim off the ship. Also if you want to know what a pirate would do to destroy a ship he would do some different things. For the old 15th century pirates they would attack the ship with cannons, and on the opposite side of the ship send small rowboats filled with one man and and barrels of gunpowder to the boat and light the fuse with flint and steel (or something dry that makes fire, not a torch) and the man jumps off and swims away. Since pirates do this pirates could expect a similar plan from the ninjas and stop it before their boat blows up. Somali pirates have access the waterproof guns, RPGs, mortars, C4, missile trackers (shoot a tracker on an object and the missile homes in on the tracker) and much more advanced technology, which gives them more options to blow ships up.
Ninja are better than pirates

While modern day pirates may have the technical advance with radars, part of a ninja's training in the discipline of ninjutsu is 火"220;"899; (literally translating to "gunpowder") is the art of pyrotechnics and explosions, as well 燧人 (water training) if necessary, a ninja could swim up to a ship, ( it would be nearly impossible to hit a ninja in the water with a blunderbuss or cannon, and in their navy blue shinobi robes [ which are only rumor to be black ] it would be very difficult to even see them, depending on the depth of the water and/or amount of sunlight) trigger an explosion, and swim away before the pirates even know what hit them. This would be especially effective at night, when everyone is sleeping, as the may not be able to escape before the boat capsizes / sinks completely.
Ninja are better than pirates

Even tho pirates may not have the training of a ninja they are still deadly. If were talking about the more classical pirate then were talking about someone like Blackbeard. A captain and his crew have a ship with cannons and guns, if the ninja is in a opposing ship he may not stand a chance (assuming he is with other ninjas who usually don't use ships that much in combat). In a fighting situation on an island or on land the ninja or ninjas may have a greater chance against a pirate because they attack with a surprise. However in a fight on a ship the pirates have a huge advantage, pirates use a blunderbuss a old version of a shotgun, you don't need to be accurate all you need to do is point and shoot. Also the pirate may carry more than one gun he/she could have 2-4 guns (pistols) on him including a blunderbuss in his hand. In another situation on the deck of a ship the shear number of pirates versus the one ninja would be too much for the ninja to handle (assuming he is alone). If it is a single pirate versus one ninja on land and the pirate sees the ninja it is hard to tell who wins, in a 1v1 situation like that the reason why someone wins is because either the ninja is more skilled than the pirate or vice versa. Finally if we are talking about modern day pirates like Somali pirates it's a whole new ball game. Somali pirates have lmg's, modern day assault rifles, explosives, bullet proof vests, motion detectors and so much more technology than the ninja has. If in any encounter a ninja appears near anyone of them the ninja is dead because their technology can help the pirates find the ninja and take him out. In the end both characters are pretty cool in the way they fight and live, but pirates have the upper hand in a situation that occurs on any ship ( a fight that occurs on the deck of a ship), naval fights ( ocean or sea naval battles), and if they know where the ninja is the ninja loses his element of surprise and has to survive on dodging bullets and having a lot of skill as well as luck (not all ninjas were trained to "dodge" bullets).
Ninja are better than pirates

First of all, please do not use specific stories as part of your argument, we are looking at the cultural impact, as well how well they would fair in combat situations against each other. Let's keep it classy. First off, weapons. A katana, the main weapon of ninjas, have the range and slicing capacity to easily win against a sabre-wielding pirate. It also has the technical advantage over a broadsword or rapier; the broadsword is quite heavy and the hilt of a rapier can make it difficult to swing in ways that can easily block the strikes of a katana. The pistols of pirates can be matched by throwing stars; although throwing stars are not as powerful as a gun, with enough training, they can be equally as easy to wield, or even easier. They are also much quieter, so they don't alert the rest of the crew.
Peyton Manning is the best quarterback currently playing in the National Football League

Just looking at my sources, we can see that Manning has been having progressively worse years. 2010 was his worst since 2002. Peyton also has a career 2:1 TD:INT ratio, while Rodgers is closer to 4:1, twice as good as Mannings, and that is for career. Peyton is coming off an injury that has left him unable to play for over a year and it is unlikely that he will be even close to as good as we was in 2010, let alone his famous 2004 year.
Peyton Manning is the best quarterback currently playing in the National Football League

I shall refute by presenting Aaron Rodgers as someone that is currently better than Peyton Manning as a QB for the NFL. My primary sources shall be [1][2]. I am listing them here because of the 500 character limit, I will need them all in future rounds. I wish my opponent the best of luck. [1] http://espn.go.com... [2] http://espn.go.com...
It is better to have lost at love than never loved at all.

It is better to have experienced the feeling of being in love and the perks that come with and endure the heartbreak than to have never experienced it at all.Being in love generally makes one happy. It makes you feel affection, romance and general euphoria when you're around the person you love. If the love his returned then the affects are magnified. [1]Overall, it is better to have the experience of something and endure the negative externalities that may come with it than to never have experienced it in the first place. How can you comment on something you've never felt? More experiences generates a more general knowledge and fuller life experience. Knowledge is power and through aquiring the knowledge about love you will become more powerful in your next romantic endevours thus increasing your prospects of a happier relationship down the road which again will generate the positive feelings of love all over again. It's a positive feedback loop really.Being in love generates positive feelings and in the end aquiring the experience of being in love will make you more knowledgable and better suited to give input and reflect on life as a whole. So not only do you get the positive aspects of being in love while in love but you also get a more general welfare in the end.Never loving at all merely allows the person to avoid heartbreak, which is not only cowardly but leaves you utterly devoid of the wonderful experience that is love.It is indeed better to have lost at love than to have never loved at all.Thank you. [1] http://www.romancetracker.com...
one should help others only when it is asked for

in todays world everybody has a great eego in front of him.But according to our responsibilities and duties towards humanity we should help others when the needy needs it. For e.g. if some person accidentally hit by a fast coming car and falls apart from his bike and is not in the condition to say anything . then should we wait that he or she ask you for help . The answer is no . Imagine yourself old enough when your are even not able get off from your bed yourself and you don't want to disturb your family . Then what would your family do , obviously they would help you. SO one should help others whenever it is needed
P.E.T.A. is wrong

For my side's context would be: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is the largest animal rights organization in the world, with more than 3 million members and supporters. PETA focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time: on factory farms, in the clothing trade, in laboratories, and in the entertainment industry. We also work on a variety of other issues, including the cruel killing of beavers, birds, and other "pests" as well as cruelty to domesticated animals. PETA works through public education, cruelty investigations, research, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns.