God most likely exists

Really, Con? You are going to criticize my response because I misspelled one word when you have many more spelling errors? "Babylonia" and "you can't sat that" just to mention two. And, in a debate in person I am sure there is nothing wrong with facial expressions, so I don't think the audience minds if I decide to use a winky face. ;) Con says there are theories about what the "banger" of the Big Bang must have been. When I talked about the "banger" I was referring to what ever caused the Big Bang that created the universe and all the Big Bangs before. Universes inside of black holes only complicates things more, and I can keep asking, "but what created that universe?". The question, "Where did God come from?" does not make sense. Everything with a beginning must have something causing it to begin. However, the origin of all things obviously can not have a beginning because then it wouldn't be the origin of what ever caused it to begin. God is this origin. He is not limited by the characteristics of our material universe because, if he exists, he is spiritual. This means he is not limited by physical time or space. He created these things. He did not have a beginning, therefor, nothing caused God to exist. He has always been there. I describe evolution as a "silly theory" because it is, and you have not demonstrated otherwise. And no, I do not believe the universe was created in seven 24-hour days. The Hebrew word we translate to "day" simply refers to a period of time. For example, in one Bible verse that same Hebrew word is used to describe part of a day when there is light, and in another verse it is used to describe all seven days of creation. There is even a verse where the Hebrew word "day" is 1,000 years for God! There is no reason to think the Bible creation days were 24-hour days. As I previously said, I am a Jehovah's Witness, not a creationist. Con insists on his third paragraph that I said: "if those creatures evolved, then how do we still have the creatures that they supposedly evolved from?". Dear readers, is this true? Have I said this? If so, when? Give your answers in the comments. On his fourth paragraph, Con claims the Bible writers were not qualified. However, he is criticizing what he doesn't know. This is not something I don't need to address. Who would know better who is qualified to write his book than the author and creator himself? To Con, the idea of Earthly paradise is ridiculous. This is understandable because of the current circumstances. "The ice caps are melting (the result of climate change), more than 1 billion people around the world living on less than a dollar a day, wars going on around the world, many caused by religion, may I add, killing innocent people." What does the Bible teach about this? God does not cause the bad conditions in the world. (Job 34:10). By calling God a liar and saying that He withholds good from His subjects, Satan questioned Jehovah"s right to rule. He raised a universal question that had God destroyed Adam, Eve, and Satan immediately, would not be answered and we wouldn't even exist. (Genesis 3:2-5). Jehovah will use his Son, the Ruler of the Messianic Kingdom, to end all human suffering and to undo its effects. (1 John 3:8). To understand this better, you can read chapter 11 of the book, What Does the Bible REALLY Teach: http://www.jw.org... And this is a very interesting and brief three minute video that talks a little bit about that: http://www.jw.org... "The four corners of the earth" is quite a controversial phrase in the Bible. Many don't know that the Hebrew word translated "corners" in Isaiah is "kanaph". Kanaph is translated in a variety of ways. However, it generally means extremity. The following quote is from http://www.christiananswers.net.... (BEGINNING OF QUOTE) There are many ways in which God could have said corner. Any of the following Hebrew words could have been used: Pinoh is used in reference to the cornerstone. Paioh means "a geometric corner" Ziovyoh means "right angle" or "corner" Krnouth refers to a projecting corner. Paamouth - If the Lord wanted to convey the idea of a square, four-cornered earth, the Hebrew word paamouth could have been used. Paamouth means square. Instead, the Holy Spirit selected the word kanaph, conveying the idea of extremity. (END OF QUOTE) Con then continues to prove the Bible is scientifically inaccurate by talking about Mary's impregnation again. We already went over this. If God exists, he could make Mary have a baby without sperm. And understand that "god did it" is a perfectly legitimate answer in this debate. You can say something in the Bible is impossible, but if God exists, it is not impossible. You can say my argument is invalid, but so is yours, because you can not prove God does not exist. Two of every "kind" entering the ark isn't unrealistic considering there wasn't as much variety of animals in the past as there are now, and most "kinds" of animals consisted of insects and small mammals. You can read more about the ark and its ample carrying capacity here: http://wol.jw.org... Con also tries to prove the Bible scientifically inaccurate by mentioning the talking snake. This is not a scientific mistake. The snake wasn't the one talking. It was Satan who talked to Eve through the snake. You can't disprove God? You can't disprove Satan either. And finally, I understand that many times one is born with homosexuality. Being born gay is not a sin. However, they have the same hope of everlasting life as straight people, and both have the same commandments to keep. Gays don't have special privileges. If their sexual desires are more important to them than their love for God how can they expect to benefit from God's kingdom? God is not asking anything impossible, and the reward is worth it. Imperfection is only temporary, because that is what it is. Man was created to be with woman. Imperfections began after Adam and Eve sinned. One wants to remain gay and doesn't care about God? He has free will, and God wont torture him eternally like many false Christians say. That's just simply not something a loving God would do. However, many would prefer eternal perfect happy lives with their loved ones both alive and who have died but will live again on Earth paradise. Again, being gay is not something that can't be controlled now, and it is not something that will be permanent. Imperfections are not permanent. And, so we're clear, perfection has to do with God's purpose for his creation. This perfection is relative to God's perfection, which is absolute. Isaiah did, in fact, say Babylon would be destroyed. The Bible also talked about its eternal desolation. And guess what? Babylon is still ruins! Your analogy about you saying you will get some water really isn't relevant. You don't believe in God, so his prophecies should not fulfill, right? It is not uncertain when the Bible prophecies were written. Both carbon dating along with internal evidences in the text suggest the prophecies were, in fact, written before they fulfilled. The following quote is from the book Reasoning from the Scriptures under "Bible": http://wol.jw.org... (BEGINNING QUOTE) Prophecy: Isaiah 44:24, 27, 28; 45:1-4: "Jehovah . . . the One saying to the watery deep, "Be evaporated; and all your rivers I shall dry up"; the One saying of Cyrus, "He is my shepherd, and all that I delight in he will completely carry out"; even in my saying of Jerusalem, "She will be rebuilt," and of the temple, "You will have your foundation laid." This is what Jehovah has said to his anointed one, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have taken hold of, to subdue before him nations, so that I may ungird even the hips of kings; to open before him the two-leaved doors, so that even the gates will not be shut: "Before you I myself shall go, and the swells of land I shall straighten out. The copper doors I shall break in pieces, and the iron bars I shall cut down. . . . For the sake of my servant Jacob and of Israel my chosen one, I even proceeded to call you by your name."" (Writing by Isaiah was completed by about 732 B.C.E.) Fulfillment: Cyrus had not been born when the prophecy was written. The Jews were not taken into exile to Babylon until 617-607 B.C.E., and Jerusalem and its temple were not destroyed until 607 B.C.E. In detail the prophecy was fulfilled starting in 539 B.C.E. Cyrus diverted the waters of the Euphrates River into an artificial lake, the river gates of Babylon were carelessly left open during feasting in the city, and Babylon fell to the Medes and Persians under Cyrus. Thereafter, Cyrus liberated the Jewish exiles and sent them back to Jerusalem with instructions to rebuild Jehovah"s temple there."The Encyclopedia Americana (1956), Vol. III, p. 9; Light From the Ancient Past (Princeton, 1959), Jack Finegan, pp. 227-229; "All Scripture Is Inspired of God and Beneficial" (New York, 1983), pp. 282, 284, 295. (END QUOTE) "Concerning your argument on inbreeding, it is true that we all have a common ancestor, but that doesn't lead to genetic mutations unless the two people who are breeding are closely related. This is proven by SCIENCE." I know... I already explained this in round 2. It is round three, and Con has failed to give ANY evidence even suggesting God, regardless of what the Bible might say, is not real. He also hasn't given any valid arguments against the Bible or to defend the silly evolution theory. I await Con's response. Thank you.