Harry Potter vs Twilight

When discussing matters such as 'which series' or 'movies' was/were better, we must realize that Pro's subjective interpretation of them and the lessons they chose to take from them are one of the most unreliable and ridiculous ways to go about it.Here are facts about both series. Harry Potter's storyline revolved around a group of children growing up, this meant all already-grown adults could barely relate to it and limited the fanbase heavily to people of a certain age range whereas with twilight people of all ages could find something in it to relate to.In Harry potter the 'buff' and 'tough' guys were demonized and hated on, look at Viktor in Goblet of fire or any of the slytherins, any guy who could be extremely hot and admirable in ways but who chose more of a rough way of life were demonized and exalted. In twilight both Jacob (the 'tough guy') and Edward (the 'not-so-macho guy') and both were able to have bad and redeemable qualities.In Harry Potter only the slim or unfit characters were admired, the only relatively buff one who wasn't evil got killed off (Cedric diggory) and really the sex was just stupid (I mean Harry and Ginny do not go together at all). There was next to no love rivalry and if there was the winner just used potions to beat the other until the other won them back afterwards... That encourages drug-induced rape tbph (what even were these 'love potions' exactly? I'm guessing Chloroform or Rohypnol).Harry Potter himself is not entirely a character worth following, he's irrational, over-confident, bad taste in women and frankly is a rude guy on top of it (to anyone other than his pedo gay friend Dumbledore).In twilight even when they are fighting over the same woman, Jacob and Edward show respect for one another as she is important. In Harry Potter, Harry just gets friendzoned and is like, okay let me f*** your bf's sister. What kind of logic or morality is that?The entire storyline is outrageous as well. If things are getting boring they just bring in a new creature or character to spice things up, in Twilight they use very much the same ones in new ways in actually creative storylines where you literally had no idea who would win Bella over up until the last book. While Jacob lost, he didn't just take the friendzone and go for Ed's sister did he now? He fought like a real man/werewolf to the bitter end and accepted his defeat after some grieving which is important to teach teens and children who will one day grow to be adults and also to please adult readers with as it's a good way to go about love.In Harry no one is passionate enough to fight over a partner for long, if love doesn't work out they literally move onto a new partner by the next book and there's 7, in Twilight 4 entire books the same people were still fighting to the bitter end that's real passion and dedication. Vampires and Werewolves are also much stronger and magnificent supernatural beings than wizards, warlocks and wizards. Spells that need to be learned? Boring. A set of skill you learn very quickly being used in lightning fast intense fights? Awesome!As for the actual way the stories go, in Twilight there's no true 'bad' or 'good' guy it's what you choose to make of each character and each has their good and bad moments, this important to teach children. Don't refuse to ever forgive someone but don't glorify them either. In Harry Potter, only bravery is glorified, being 'cunning' (which just means socially smart), 'intellectual' (ravenclaw), or 'honest' (hufflepuff) are trampled on. brave and extroverted people are not superior to others and making this apparent the entire series is very emotionally damaging to readers who are not of the gryffindor persona. Why did Gryffindor have to win house points every year? Why did Harry have to be so popular? Everything was oriented to outgoing, popular people and any introverted people with complex morality compasses or personas were all made to either die or be villains. It is totally and utterly ridiculous.All the main characters had next to no complexity to them, all sub-mains too, only the enemies of the main characters or characters that had barely any time had genuinely complex personalities. Draco and Voldemort were by far the most interesting characters the entire series the only main 'good guy' who had any remote inner twists was Dumbledore, guess what the conflict was? He was homosexual, big f***ing whoop. He wasn't even a good guy though, he manipulated Snape to take the brunt of his own pathological lying and Snape just bent over and took it. It is a really ridiculous story where only bad or non-main characters have any complexity to them. Harry Potter was just an arrogant guy with no taste in women, Ron was an airhead with some random spur-of-the-moment flukes of ingenuity, Hermione was a sexually frustrated nerd who had a thing for airheads that had spur-of-the-moment flukes of ingenuity and the other characters were boring. The moral of the story in Harry Potter is that fighting solves everything and winning wars is the best way to prove superiority of ideology, Twilight's moral is that anyone can win anything, it's just about timing and persistence. I know which I'd want my child growing up believing and gaining role models from.