A Strictly Atheistic World View Can Not Account For Morality.

Thanks for your response. Metz said, "Second the people/self being the judge is what I am arguing. The Ultimate judge is humanity." To say that humanity is the ultimate judge is not saying anything. For instance, in one part of the world it may be morally acceptable to murder your wife if she disobeys her husband. In another part of the world that particular act may be unacceptable. But, which view of the issue is right? Who decides it? The point is, that to base what is considered right or wrong off humanity is ridiculous, since humanity can not agree on an absolute, universal view of what is considered moral or immoral. Since this is true anything could be acceptable, such as murder, rape, lying cheating, abusing, drugs ect... Why? Again, because morality is totally arbitrary under the jurisdiction of humanity, since all humans have different standards of morals. And since all humans have different standards on morals, then this just illustrates my point, there must be a God to judge people's actions. In an Atheistic world there are no absolutes for morals. Also, if there are seven hundred billion people on the planet and half say gay marriage is right but the other half say gay marriage is wrong, then who decides? What makes one view right and the other wrong? This question can not be answered in an Atheistic universe, since all the opinions given by the people are different. So, humanity, can not, on it's own make a rational decision, dealing with morality. This is why there must be an objective standard for people to base their judgement off of. Again, under an Atheistic world view morals can not be accounted for. "Why is it immoral to kill? Because if it was allowed then people would freely kill us." What about the people who could care less about whether or not death is a reaction of killing another person. For instance, a man could be very enraged at a particular moment, so, what if he decides to kill everyone in the town regardless of wether he dies that day or lives, in the process of committing all the murders he can. Not only that flaw, but there are people who murder people all the time without getting caught, or getting killed back in the process. So for these murderers there is no incentive what so ever for them to not go out and murder another human being. Plus, saying that its immoral to murder because you will get murdered back is not even answering the question of why it is immoral to murder another human being. You need to tell me why murder is wrong in the first place. Metz said "Do to others as we would have done to ourselves." Its amazing how Atheists think, they will always claim there world has morals, and do things such as feed the poor and help many in need ect... These are all good things, its just the principles in which these acts are found, are in the Bible. You see, Atheists take morals from the Christian world view but do not acknowledge the basis of which those morals came from, which is ultimately God. Now I'm not saying that all of the morals in an Atheistic world view are taken from Christianity, but a lot of them are, Along with many other religions that acknowledge the presence of a god. Metz said, "Also if we look to the roots of morality we don't find God, but humanity." Prove to me that we find humanity, don't just say it, prove it or at least tell expand on that reasoning. I do not agree with that statement at all and until you try to prove it it is just your word against mine. Which is exactly what an atheistic world view consists of, one man's word against another, which is no absolutes or universal ideas I also encourage the voters to check out this link, it will help illustrate my point. http://www.youtube.com... Thank you charles 15 Good Luck