The Earth is not 4.5 billion years old - But is young

"I think it would be beneficial to readers to stick to our best three arguments." Very well, I will stick with your three points only. "Argument #1 - The Earths Magnetic Field" According to the Dynamo Theory of the Earth's magnetic field, which asserts that a magnetic field of an astronomical body is created by a process through which a rotating, convecting, and electrically conducting fluid (i.e. molten iron) acts to maintain a magnetic field, the Earth could keep a magnetic field for approximately 20,000 at it's original strength before the electrical resistance of the planet begins to decay [1]. When we include the factors of thermal and compositional convention from the outer core, the whole system of rotating, and convecting electrically conductive fluid, we find that the mechanical energy of the motion is converted into magnetic energy and dissipates it via Ohmic heating [2]. Evidence for this theory is found in what is known as tidal heating. Tidal heating is the friction caused by the gravitation attraction between two bodies. This tidal heating induces flows in the body's interior which starts, and so long as the gravitational attraction is sufficient, continues, the whole process [3]. "Argument #2 - Helium Diffusion in Zircon crystals" The evidence for this point appears to stem from a program called RATE (Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth). For one thing, the zircon crystals were the exception, as they were the only crystals to provide any evidence that goes against a multi-billion year old Earth. Not only that, but the nuclear decay rate for the zircon crystals were also consistent with a multi-billion year old Earth. [4] There are also two major problems with the RATE model. The first being that it assumed that the Earth's temperature had not changed over the course of its lifetime. This is known to be false, as the temperature of the Earth has been fluctuating over the past 400,000 years [5]. The second major problem is that the "modeling of the helium diffusion clock required an underlying model for the helium diffusion kinetics (i.e. the manner in which temperature affects the motion of atoms). Using data from a laboratory experiment in which gas released from a zircon sample was measured at different temperatures, they extracted the parameters for a simple kinetic model. The problem with this model is that it treated all helium atoms the same, regardless of whether they were in the bulk crystal or near a defect. Most helium atoms will lie in portions of the undisturbed crystal, whereas only a small fraction will lie in the vicinity of a defect. At low temperatures, the small fraction of atoms near a defect will be mobile, whereas the vast majority of atoms will only begin to move at higher temperatures" [4]. "Argument #3 - Lunar Recession from the earth" That is only assuming that the impact theory is correct, as there are many theories out there [6]. One theory is that the moon was captured by the Earth early on in its life. This avoids the problem of time, while still explaining why the Lunar surface is compositionally similar to the Earth, and why the age of Lunar rocks are similar to those found on the Earth [7][8]. 1. http://en.wikipedia.org... 2. http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk... 3. http://astroman.org... 4. http://www.reasons.org... 5. http://en.wikipedia.org... 6. lunarorigin.com/lunar-origin-models 7. James Papike, Grahm Ryder, and Charles Shearer (1998). "Lunar Samples". Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 36: 5.1"5.234. 8. http://www.sciencedaily.com...