Zimmerman acted in self defense

I accept Con's challenge. Because the Con used his first Round to display an argument, I will use mine to Cross Examine his. I will display a case in Round 2, once the Con has had a chance to display a real case of his own.-------------------------------------------------------------------------- "He got away with murder. The jury should have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for killing an unarmed teenager who was racially profiled as being a bad black kid in the neighborhood." The Jury can not find a man guilty beyond a reasonable doubt if there was in fact a Reasonably doubt. The Prosecution did a bad job and could not refute the evidence that backed up Zimmerman's case.A world where one can be convicted even with reasonable doubt simply to meet the demands of a mob would be a terrible world indeed.To prove that Zimmerman got away with murder, the Con must first prove he did not act in self-defense. The con must also prove that Zimmerman racially profiled the teenager. To do this, he must read the 911 call Transcript."Of course there were crimes in the neighborhood prior to the Zimmerman/ Martin incident so that means he was racially profiling Trayvon as being one of the bad black teenagers in the neighborhood known for committing crimes and decided to take the law into his own hands after the dispatcher told him to leave the teenager alone."The Con fails to properly understand the definition of Racial Profiling... To suspect a black person for being black is racial profiling... To suspect someone because persons matching his description have been committing crimes is not racial profiling. According to the 911 Transcript, race wasn't involved until the Police Dispatcher asked for a race.You know why they ask for someone's race? Because once you know the person is black, you remove 87.7% of the population, and help narrow it down. It's not racial profiling. It's profiling based off a description that the person met.The Con must understand the difference between breaking the law and doing something inadvisable."The Justice system is broken for blacks in America since the civil rights movement." It wasn't broken when it handled OJ Simpson's case when he murdered a white woman... It went with the black man. Do you know why they didn't lock OJ Simpson away for murder? Because there was a reasonable doubt, either that, or it's broken in favor of Black people. Given how the Government is still trying to get Zimmerman on other charges just so they can put him away, I'd say your argument is flawed and broken.Saying the Justice System is broken JUST because you didn't win the case is simply pointing fingers. It's unwarranted. And worst of all... It's immature. That's all it will be unless you can gather evidence to back your accusation.The fact that the system didn't throw Zimmerman away does not mean it failed, it means it worked... It resisted the NAACP and the mobs, and let free a man they couldn't gather enough evidence against...a) http://www.debate.org..."Zimmerman should have also used his fist to confront the teenager instead of using his gun to kill him. If Trayvon had a gun and had threaten Zimmerman that would have been another case but Trayvon was unarmed."Trayvon used his fists to confront Zimmerman when Zimmerman asked a simple question, so the first part of this argument is irrelevant. Trayvon reached for Zimmerman's gun, so the second half of your argument is irrelevant. This is because Zimmerman did not react with shooting until Trayvon had attempted to obtain a gun (Zimmerman's gun.)You do not need to be threatened with a gun to be entitled self-defense. Zimmerman didn't even use the gun until Trayvon started reaching for it.-------------------------------------------------------------------------- I want the Con to answered 3 questions...1 - Does Zimmerman's past reflect that of a man who would "racial profile" someone for being black? (here is a start, look up Sherman Ware)2 - What wounds did Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman obtain (PRIOR to the Gunshot.)3 - What is the Resolution of this debate?I rest my argument for now.