is the bible true, with reference to genesis one

Burden of Proof Issues: The BoP lies entirely on the opposition to prove as his claims are unscientific, and according to Bertrand Rusell, the one who makes an unscientific claim must always have the Philosophical Burden of Proof.Definitions:True: Objection One: YEC StanceWith this said, let us look at the opposition's points in detailed; he is taking the Young Earth Creation stance, and he even talks about how the universe is necessarily finite, a very unscientific claim that shall be proven, empirically and rationally, in the following rounds. The YEC (Young Earth Creationism) stance is based upon the fundamental postulates that "man" was created by an all-good, omnipotent and omniscient "God" who exists, as a person, apparently.More on the YEC stance; accordingly to measurments from ancient Jewish texts, it was assumed that Christianity believed that the earth was around 6,000 years old. That man, who developed from "God's will" did not originate out of any other animals, and was created in the shadow of God, is a wholly unempirical statement. There is one ongoing experiment, that seems to validate the claims of evolution, and how man could have evolved from a single cell bacteria, to a perfect human being.Commonly called the "Russian Fox Experiment" this experiment attempted to show that qualities from a mother and a father are often mixed together, and through this process of quasi-natural quasi-selective breeding, characteristic traits of foxes were indeed explored. The foxes were divided into two groups; group one were aggressive, whilst group two were passive foxes. The passive foxes kept this characteristic throughout the experiment, and the same could be said about aggressive foxes; in fact, the experiment gave rise to a domesticated form of red morphs, which seems to affirm evolution and the theory of natural selection.Objection Two: The Universe and FinityThe Universe is necessarily infinite, accordingly to calculations on Natural Philosophy by Sir Isaac Newton and the deductions of Baruch Spinoza. After observing that stars do not attract each others, albeit they have polar poles and polar poles attract with other polar poles, it must be said that something else must have been pulling negative poles away from the positive ones. This gave rise to the hypothesis, which seems only true to me, that the universe is infinite.Let us take this to prove the universe's absolute infinity; the universe is a substance (philosophical substance, something that can be conceived only by itself, and not by something else) and all substances are necessarily infinite. Firstly, let one discuss why the universe is a substance; the universe, firstly, can only be understood by studying itself. In fact, our conceptions of "extrauniversal" comes from what used to exist, millions of year ago, as albeit light travels at a fast rate, the distance is "far" so to say.With this said, proving all substances to be infinite shall be the next considerations. After affirming that two substances have nothing in particularly the same manner, for them doing so would transfer them into modes/attributes, which would need another substance to conceive, then a substance is either finite or infinite. But a substance cannot be finite, for it would have the same nature to be limited, and necessarily finite, but this substance does not exist. Something is either finite or infinite; if finity is not a matter, not a attribute or mode of existence, and intuitive representations, then the human timescale cannot be applied to intuitive representations.The Bible's attempts to present humanity, and ultimately, time, in a period of 7-days (yom) scales are, as proven, refutable via science and rational deduction. Objection Three: Realism Factor of the BibleThe Bible's teachings are contradictory; let us first take this quote by Epicurus. Why does evil exist, if God is all good? Is it really realistic to say that the earth was created in Seven Days, and a global flood happen? The abundance of evidence seems to disprove the previous statements. The Earth cannot be created in 7 days, for what defines day if the earth does not move around the sun; there is no definition of days henceforth, which seems to prove this account contradictory. And even if we were to take the night-to-night Hebrew-based translation, then it would even be more absurd; earth was created by an acreation from a solar nebula; i.e it attracts matter and dust from the leftover matters of the sun's creation. This is known to us through mathematical deductions done by astrophysicists being able to confirm the theory of relativity, which soon led to the deduction of all energy as coming from the sun.Let us then now talk about God in general; it generally comes to the fact that, can a Christian prove God to an radical empiricist, who will not take any deduced arguments, as existence cannot be rationalized? Existence as an intuitive representation, and it is only through reasoning that intuitive representations arise of. One cannot prove that intuitive representations exist without any empirical evidence of its existence; sentences, human cognition and reasoning, are all implemented via sensory experience. Ideas, simple ones, are connected to form reasoning and propositions, and these ideas are often yielded via imagination, which is gained from the refinement of these cognitive functions during the childhood period. God is a complex idea; he is complex in the sense that to be able to doubt that He exists is enough to make him complex. For all complex ideas arise out of one source; simple ideas, and simple ideas, connected, are not always true. Existence and matter, two simple ideas, could be combined and confused to say that a humanoid exists underground. Simple ideas cannot be yielded, but can only be assent upon; complex ideas, in which we can divide (what does this God look like, what does he smell like, i.e all the plethora of questions surrounding God) him, and since ultimately, we can prove that the simple ideas which yields God true, we cannot prove God true.RESOLUTION IS NEGATED