Evolution is false, for more than three reasons, these are some of them.

In this debate, I will point out that evolution is false for many reasons. I will begin with Darwin and how he narrowly mindly thought up evolution due to the way he saw the creatures and the universe around us. Darwin was brought up in a rich family, had his college paid for and all was well for him. Like Adam, God made a perfect world for him to live in, all the fruit to eat, no paid, no death, amazing land to live it. Life was at it's full. When Darwin grew up, his father wanted him to go learn science at college, but instead Darwin did not want to, he wanted to explore nature and its glory by him self. Adam also disobeyed God and was drawn in by the serpent, Satan. Darwin then journied around the world. On his voyage he saw that some birds, which were finches. He saw that the beaks were different sizes. After 20 years of writing his book, Origin of Species. Dawin conluded that there was no need for God, so there must be no God. Due to him thinking that God allowed his daughter to die aged 10. I would have thought that the death of his two daughers and one son would had of lead him to publish the book, Origin of Species. I will now list what is wrong about evolution. 1) This is my main reason and it is a very good reason to not believe and place faith into evolution. According to evolution we as a race have evolved over 10's of millions of years from a single celled orginism. If this is true, how can we trust our eyes, nose, ears, touch and taste? For if we have evolved over many millionms of years how are we 100% sure that you are in the part at 4:25 on a hot summers day? When really you are in a small room being told to stand up against the wall, to be shot? How can anyone prove I am not true, if they believe in evolution. Better solution: God created me, and since God is the creator of the universe I can fully trust 100% in all of my five great and wonderful gifts given by God. To see what I am see is real and legit, I am witnessing and knowing that all my five senors are living reality, and truth. 2) Fossils do not prove evolution in the slightest, as said by Kend Hovind. You do not know that any fossil had any offspring, and since science is factual and theories and made up of facts, evolution stuggles on this one alot. It is not a fact that every creature gives birth, but it is a fact that creatures give birth. It is also not a fact that a certian gound of creatures had any offspring. So it is pure asumption to say that this creature evolved into this other creature. It is a guessing game, it is far more realistic (relating to the previous question) that all creatures have a common designer (God) rather than common ancestors. Better solution: There was a world wide flood, causing all living thing which did not enter the ark to drown. It rained for 40 days and 40 nights but the earth was not fully covered by water in till 6 months pasted. Under the crust of the earth there was a layer of water which seeped through the groud, which took around 6 months to submerge the earth utterly. Men would have continued to find higher ground in till there was no higher ground to live upon, same goes for the creatures. This is why scientists fine fossils of creature thousands of feet up, on a mountian. The flood also explains the reason why scientists find sea fossils on mountain tops. Since, of course, the water from the flood covered even the highest mountain. 3) No missing links: It is either one creature or another, there is never a creature where a group of scientists will say, "It is this creature, and it is also this creature!" The missing link would need to consist of a creature which has the skeleton of one creature and of another, otherwise the creature does not change, but remains like another other creature of it's kind (kind, by which I mean the horse, bear, and human kind, for examples). Better solution: God said, "Ever creature will only bring forth it's own kind." I have never seen anything other than that. And I am sure you have not either. You say, "It takes millions of year." In that case there are no missing links. For if I can see a missing link dead, I should see a missing link alive. DNA does not contain or collect any new information, but if modified you can only take away features by taking away DNA or add DNA which it already has. Sure you can add DNA from a lion into a mouse but the lions DNA will not correctly work with its organs and general build. Even if you could, the mouse will still be a mouse, as a animal is classed mostly by it's actions and behavior. (A monkey dressed in human cloths and walking around does not impose the monkey is at human). It is a monkey still, same with the mouse. The most vital reason why evolution is a scam is the first reason. If you can not trust in your eyes etc, how can you trust what you see as science really being science? I will leave this to Con to discover. I wish him/her the best.