Evolution is a more viable theory regarding our status (Existence) than Creationism

Also, I accept your apology for your tardiness regarding argumentation. Rebuttals1) "The second Law of Thermodynamics makes evolution impossible. The second law of thermodynamics states that states that energy and matter tends to go from order to chaos[1]. Thus how could it be possible for life to exist if energy and matter go from order to disorder? Life requires order to flourish and evolution shows that life goes from simple to more and more complex. "Seeing as evolution involves science (Physical science)(We originated from single-cellular organisms, overtime evolving, along with our genes), if it's proven to violate even a single scientific law, it is then, falsified. Indeed. According to the 2nd law of thermodynamics[1], everything tends toward disorder. However, say, there's a barrel between balls. I have a wooden plank. Having established the fact that wood is vulnerable to fire, I ignite it. I throw it to the barrel. The barrel explodes. The balls are no longer where they were. However, I can grab them and return them to their previous locations.2) "Life appeared spontaneously. If you look at the fossil record complex life forms appear spontaneously where as the theory of evolutions suggests there were gradual changes to lead up to this complex life[2][3][4]. "Fossil records of 1 amongst many varieties of species are exceedingly rare, and only occur under specific conditions, and that the earliest multi-cellular life forms were all soft-bodied (And invertebrates) and thus left little to no trace as fossils for us to observe due to not having a bone that doesn't rot[2], unlike the body.3) " All current plants and animals have not evolved since creation, outside of extinctions, and genetic variation in originally created species of plants and animals has only occurred within narrow limits[5]. "YOU DON'T KNOW THAT! You have not discovered animals and plants evolving, neither have others notified you. However, my "Observation" contention debunks this.4) "Mutations and Natural selection would not be enough to divide species into completely different Kingdoms of animals[6]. "However: Before a kind of species evolve, they can produce one amongst the same kind of species, and the same cycles. A kind of species probably were permanently removed. However, the "16 million different species" included those. "What I am trying to say is, is it feasible to think that there are enough random genetic mutations that would have changed an organism from a tree into a human? "1. Question is irrelevant.2. "Observation" contention debunks this. Observation"Where has a scientist observe a man evolve from an ape? Scientists have hypothesized such but it was never, at least to my knowledge, observed. "You may drop this argument without affection of votes; I don't have adequate evidence; My friend simply showed be the documentary of a scientist (Who discovered and recorded) discovering an ape evolving. Fossil Evidence"As addressed above there are many holes where there should not be. Along with that the fossil record goes against the second law of thermodynamics. "Debunked arguments. Relation between humans and related living organisms"Grant you that we share a lot of DNA with apes. However we share 51% of our DNA with a fruit fly and we have nothing in common[7]"Here's the thing: We originated from single-cellular cells. They overtime, can evolve into a monkey. However, the next stage of a monkey is human being. So, their DNAs, obviously, will be related. Noah's arkUnless you advocate Biblical Creationism (Which is what contention is against), you may drop this argument WITHOUT affection of votes. I await my opponent's next set of arguments. Sources[1] . https://en.wikipedia.org...[2] . https://en.wikipedia.org...