Resolved: Brendan is a Buzz Kill

James, James, James, James, James, this case, no, one more for good measure, James, your previous argument demonstrates clearly that this entire proposition is nothing more than a projection of your own social issues. Judges, this shall be demonstrated as follows. Mr. of God, Senor de Dios, Lord Poo Poo Pants has posited that my first contention does not provide a buzz in that Brendan's idealism creates unrealistic hopes that fall short of reality. While it may be true that these disappointments end in Brendan's dissinheartenment and that is unfortunate, such disappointments are completely apart from the ready supply of buzz which Brendan supplies. Brendan's buzz is provided to the rest of us. Not a single one of us would be on this website if we did not yearn for the thrill of the debate. One would hope that each one of us also has some degree of a desire to see the world become a happier place. It is to these hopes and desires that Brendan provides such a ready buzz by alerting us to the realities of the world and showing us where the world is falling short of its potential. Wrath projects his own buzz killing nature on Brendan when he reads these calls for a more noble society and sees only gloom and desolation. One would presume this comes as a result of his sexual impotency. By the way, congratulations on the immaculate conception. Next, the Senator from Douchetopia presents a confusing and misdirected response to my second contention wherein he accuses Brendan of supplying a buzz which he then kills. Inherent in this argument is a concession of Brendan's buzz providing nature. However, more distressing is the entirely unsubstantiated claim that Brendan then goes on to kill the buzz he has created. If the buzz was originally created by Brendan's providing enlightening information, would not the supplying of further information only enhance the buzzforic state? But no Wrath, it is you, in your attempts to bring Brendan down to a crushing mediocrity that kills his feast of buzz. Finally, this Glenn Beck lover, ya, you guys don't like Glenn Beck do you? Well Wrath wants to make Glenn Beck President, and Pope. Not such a good guy anymore is he? Where was I? Ah yes, finally, GB lover reveals in his response that indeed he only ever had one weak and lonely contention, that of history. Indeed as has previously been shown by my defense of my first contention, Brendan's action of providing insight and vision only enhances buzz, as it did for Wrath in those instances. How can this be proved? Wrath clearly derives a great deal of buzzification from his debates, is he not the one who invited us all to this very forum? And what did the supply of Brendan's enlightening information do? It furthered debate, enhancing Wrath's buzz as well as that of all the rest of us. Where does the true fault lie? In none other than this fear mongering puppy kicker who seeks to cut off Brendan's supply of unicorns and rainbows. Judges, to this point the flow stands clearly in my favor. Logic commands a vote for "Con". Brendan, stand true to your principles and recognize that you are no murderer of buzz. Bill, if you don't vote for me I'll totally out you about the true nature of your relationship with the steamy, Latin yet black Federico (it's homosexual, just in case you guys got confused there).