There is Observable Impericle Evidence that Allah Exists.

"I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity." ~ George Bernard Shaw "When you eliminate the impossible. Whatevers left, no matter how improbable, has to be the truth." Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ~ Sherlock Holmes Yes all your definitions are ok apart from "undenyable" (spelt undeniable) as it was supposed to be (e)mpericle. Meaning: Based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic. Observable doesn't have to be something you see first hand, observable evidence that it's the year 2000 would be that it's 2000 years after AD was marked, of course you don't have to live 2000 years to know this. Another example would be evolution is a theory because we haven't witness a single species adapt into another since we've been on earth. To elaborate on the meaning of the word "Allah", it means the One true (G)od of Abraham. "Illah", would mean any god, it could be a statue, or a person, like Jesus. I will simultaneously debunk the Bible in case you would want to use the argument, "the Bible is just as profound yet both books contradict therefore your argument is invalid", if (if) that were true that would be a very strong argument. As it's a 3 round debate I suggest we cram in as much facts in as we can rather than ellaborating too much on certain subjects. For round 2 I will focus more on authenticating the Quran using mathematics, and less on proving it's divine intervention. SO. The Quran is much more simplistic than the bible, and our athiest friends would agree. How is a 5 year old supposed to understand the complexities of the Trinity. There are 40,000 christian denominations so it can't be that simplistic. Around 70 english different bibles, and God knows how many non english bibles. So it's not preserved, it's altered, and not authentic. We don't even have it's original form as the original copies were burned in the Vatican. There is only 1 Arabic Quran, (but 20 english Quran representations). There are only 72 Islamic sects. The Quran has been orally preserved, and there are 5,000,000 people on earth today who have memorised the entire Quran today, therefore it's impossible for it to be lost. If every Quran on earth was burnt we could reproduce it in 5 minutes. All we'd have to do is recite it, and if someone in Lebanon made a mistake in his recitation, a 7 year old in Egypt would correct him. You can't do this with the Bible or any other Holy Book. The Quran means "that which is recited". The Quran confirms the Gospel of Jesus as it was at the time of Muhammad (not now), confirms the Torah (not as it is now). It has mathematical miracles that can't be mere coincidences and accidents, like the miracle of 19 in the Quran. Not only do these mathematical miracles prove divinity, but also prove that it's preserved, because if a single iota was to be changed not a single of these miracles would remain there. https://asharisassemble.com... Remember the Quran has 6,000 verses and 350,000 letters. Every single words opposite, appears an equal number of times in the Quran. No matter what type of word it is. As someone currently learning Arabic I know how hard this is. The word for man (ar-Rajul) and the word for woman (Imra-ah) occur 24 times each. The word for satan (shaytaan) and the word for angel (malaa-ikah) occur 68 times each. The word for this life (dunya) and the word for the next life (aakhirah) occur 115 times each. The word for month (shahr) occurs 12 times. The word for two months (shahrayn) occurs 30 times. The word for day (yaum) occurs 365 times. The word for dry land (barr, etc.) occurs 13 times when contrasted with the word for sea (bahr) which occurs 32 times. Now 13 to 32 happens to be the approximate ratio of land to water on the surface of the globe.?????????????? What explains these instances of correspondence? There are three viable considerations: either it is by chance, by human design, or by divine design. But these are too much to credit to mere chance. Nor did it come about by human design. No one knew about this until recent studies uncovered it. The chapter named al-Hadeed (Iron) is the 57th chapter. It has 29 verses. There is a mathematical relationship between these two numbers, as follows: 57 x 29 = 1653 The sum of the whole numbers from 1 to 57 is the same, represented mathematically as: 1+2+3+. . .+ 57=1653 It appears that the number of verses could have been almost any number, and that 29 was chosen to result in this correspondence. The chapter al-Hajj (The Pilgrimage) has the Quran"s last mention of "pilgrimage" in verse number 27. This verse has 14 words. There is a mathematical relationship between these two numbers: 14 x 27 = 378 1+2+3+. . .+ 27=378 That's enough on Mathematics. It has linguistic poetic miracles, which has caused many famous poets around the world to convert to Islam. It is the fastest growing religion in the world (including athiesm), the fastest among university graduates (including athiesm), and 70% of those who study comparative religion convert to islam, 80% of these are women. The bible however says the earth is flat? The earth and all it's life was created before the sun? Light was before the sun and other stars? Adam and Eve coincidently already has sexual organs before they were forced to reproduce? Apparently the leader at the time of Moses was "pharoah" according to the Bible. The Quran correctly states it was"king", it was impossible for anyone to know this until we gained access to hieroglyphics in the 21st century. The Quran also correctly states that the kings body was "preserved as an example for the whole of humanity", whereas the bible incorrectly states he was lost at sea. The Kings body now remains at the Alexandria museum, the worlds largest tourist attraction. The worlds largest tourist attraction? "preserved for the whole world to see?" Not only does the Quran correct our understanding of the past, it also predicts the future and has many fulfilled prophecies. Has sciences (30 complete sciences) that no man of the 7th century could possibly have known until the 21st century (1400 years), let alone an illiterate arabian caravan trader (Muhammed). These sciences include Cosmology, Embryology, Psychology, Geology, Tectonics, Biology, Hygiene, Genetics, and 22 more. Let's use embryology as an example. The Quran (650AD) states that the foetus begins as like a leech. Until the 19th century science believed that the sperm contains a mini embryo which already contains the foetus (drops of baby). Or there was a mini embryo already waiting in the egg (wrong). The Quran at this point contradicted science, but correctly stated that the sperm and the egg come together and fertilize creating the embryo. But then! It was only until 1930, that science (1930AD ) accepted the Quranic version (650AD) of embryology (1400 YEARS DIFFERENCE!!). Now, what changed science between 650AD and 1930AD,was the discovery of the electromicroscope. So you could physically see what's going on at the egg. So when they looked they could see, that what takes place is exactly how the Quran describes, which is impossibly true. The Question is, how was the Qurans version of Embryology 1400 years ahead of us? Was it a mere coincidence? Well you can safely say that there is a 50% chance of it being a coincidence or not, as you have no reason to claim that it's a coincidence. However, if (if) I were to tell you that the Quran was 1400 years ahead of us, in 30 different complete sciences. This is no mere coincidence. The Quran could have only been authored by man or God, but since it's impossible for any man to have authored the Quran, the only possibility left, is God. This is the truth. This God calls himself Allah. "When you eliminate the impossible. Whatevers left, no matter how improbable, has to be the truth." Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ~ Sherlock Holmes So no my athiest friend it's not "an impossibility". THIS IS WHAT IM CLAIMING (CLAIMING). If what I was claiming were true, then no man on earth could have authored this book, therefore God exists. UNDOUBTEDLY. You should by now (assuming you read the shabir ally article) undoubtedly agree that the Quran has been unchanged and unalteterd, and there is at least a 40% chance of divine intervention? You should agree, that if (if) I can provide quotes from the Quran which are profound and not possible for any 7th century man to have know, then I've eliminated the impossible, and only God is left? So ask me for proof, and tell me that your genuinely interested and not just wanting an argument, and I'll give you more proof. In the next round I will give you proof on the Qurans scientific claims, and whatever else you ask of.