The Bible is Valid

Simple and straight foward.p1. The bible at the very least assumes jesus of nazareth walked the earth. p2.Jesus didn't exist. Thehistoricity of Jesus Christ. Every argument that attempts to show that Jesus existed, has logical or evidential fallacies. Anyone who says that Jesus definitely existed is merely giving their opinion, because the evidence clearly shows that Jesus is just a fictional character who never existed. If you value evidence and logic you will accept the non-existence of Jesus Christ. The case supported by evidence . 1. There is not one single writing from or about Jesus during his supposed lifetime Like the supposed founders of countless religions, Jesus left no personal writings of any kind, nor any trace of his existence. No writing, graffiti, or evidence of any kind has ever been found from the period in which he supposedly lived that establishes the existence of Jesus. If we are to take the view that Jesus was actually the son of God, and god himself…Then it would be peculiar that he was unable to write and chose to write nothing himself. Of course the counter argument to this is that God wanted people to have faith so he intentionally didn't leave any evidence of himself.Absurd. Howeve even if we take the view of Jesus was just a real person who was a teacher and the leader of a religious movement, then we could surely expect that this person would have produced his own writings, since other rabbis, theologians, and teachers did. Scholars state that based on the information given in the Gospels Jesus had to have died in either the year 27, 30, or 33 CE. With a supposed ministry of Jesus that lasted from 1 to 3 years, we are looking at a date range from about 24 CE to 36 CE as the period during which we could look for writings about Jesus that were produced during his "lifetime". Even the Gospels themselves state many times that "scribes" were present during the various acts of Jesus, yet we have no records from these supposed scribes. Nothing in the Jewish midrash of the time mentions anything about Jesus Christ or any of the events in the Gospels. Not only this, but there are many people that lived during the supposed lifetime of Jesus, whose written works have been preserved, and whom we could expect to have written about him. Here are some of the primary persons who lived during the supposed lifetime of Jesus, whose works we have, and who we could reasonably expect would have mentioned Jesus had he existed, yet they do not Justus of Tiberias, Philo of Alexandria , Pliny the Elder, Seneca the Younger, Valerius Maximus, Velleius Paterculus. These were all historians that lived during the time of Jesus yet not one of them mentions him. All of the mentioned above lived during the same time that Jesus supposedly lived and are prime candidates for being potential witnesses and documenters of the existence of Jesus. The overwhelming lack of commentary about Jesus in the historical sources of his supposed time has troubled Christians from the very beginning. The Gospels make many claims that are contradicted by the historical record Even though the Gospels only cover a brief time-span, there few claims which are made that can be checked against the known historical record. Here are a few examples of claims that are made in the Gospels which are either contradicted by the historical record or are unconfirmed outside of the Gospels. Star of Bethlehem - No record of such a celestial event Roman census in Jesus birth story – No record of any census that matches this description. Massacre of the Innocent - No record of this event John the Baptist – Killed early in the Gospels, died in 36 CE according to Josephus. Death of Jesus – Accompanied by blackout of sun, earthquakes, and raising of the dead Absolutely not a shred of evidence of any of the above. Sources. http://pastebin.com... Conclusion.The bible is not valid.Since jesus didn't exist.