Exterminate religion.

Pro: "we need to target the parasite afflicting humans." Of which most of humanity agrees is Atheism. Notice at the height of wealth, balance, and safety, America was heavily Christian. The New Atheist Movement became prevelant in the 2000's and morality, balanced wealth, and security went into free fall. Atheism has no unifying effect because it has no beliefs, thus no commonality in its flock, just biological effect. It's a view with no meaning or purpose, nor good or evil, but simply pitiless indifference. -- Pro: "There is no getting around it, religion is tougher than nails." This is because standing for nothing while sitting around waiting to die is: 1)Psychologically destructive 2)A sufficating of the psychological hierarchy of needs 3)Irrational per Pascal's Wager 4)Void of meaning or purpose 5)The mindset of someone who has given up and accepted defeat. 6)A negative belief system 7)Child abuse by indoctrination of a negative, defeated belief system void of meaning or purpose. 8)A belief that has escalated suicide as it grows. https://www.washingtonpost.com... http://www.befrienders.org... http://www.cnn.com... -- Pro: "First, I would not classify Atheism as a religion." Atheism has: 1)Churches 2)Passing out of pamphlets 3)Tithing 4)Faith http://www.huffingtonpost.com... http://www.youngcons.com... http://www.atheistrev.com... -- Pro: "many of the world's smartest people are atheists." Of the 10 highest IQ's at least 8 are known theists and 6 are Christians. http://www.freerepublic.com... http://www.scottmsullivan.com... -- Pro: "We have a better shot at stopping religion than science." I disagree. Once New Atheism took over much of science, firing anyone who challenged concepts that adhered to atheism, mocking and ridiculing creationism even when not attached to a religion, was caught with fraudulant "finds", and secular scientists such as David Berlinski claimed Atheism was using dogma to influence findings and results, many agnostics and theists quit blindly accepting anything "science" says. This kind of "Science" isn't taken seriously by the majority anymore. Pro: "The difference with science is once the cat is out of the bag, it is out." Most of aren't convinced it was a cat that jumped out of that bag, but a shape shifting cameleon. Was it this cat? http://www.debate.org... -- Pro: "Science is based upon objectivity and evidence." Exactly. Darwinism does not meet the bare minimal of the requirements of the scientific method. It is not observable, testable, or measurable. Many claim variation within a species is not darwinism but simply variation within the programmed construct of the said species or kingdom. For example, bacteria cannot become something other than bacteria. They can show variations available to bacteria, but not qualities of a dog or bird. Even Darwin thought of the fossil record as the enemy of his theory. Darwinism looks completely past the Cambrian Explosion and many giant human skeletons found. http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org... "And I suppose it's possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer." --Richard Dawkins, Atheist, author of "The God Delusion" http://www.conservapedia.com... -- Pro: "Just look at Saudia Arabia. Perhaps the real question is which has more sexism, religious people or atheist?" If you want to rid the world of Islam, be my guest. But Christianity and Islam are completely opposite teachings. Compare their infallable leaders. *Muhammed- Kill unbelievers *Jesus-"Loveyour enemies *Muhammed-Eye for an eye *Jesus-Turn the other cheek --- Comparative link- http://www.thereligionofpeace.com... --- Pro: "warrant for this claim." Giant 'humans'- http://therundownlive.com... -- Con: "cut down all the rain forests." And of a godless lack of divine accountability? -- Pro: "scientifically God doesn't exist." I disagree. I think it's headed in the opposite direction. Biology was discriminately used to try and "help" militant Atheism. Physics is heading us the other way. Have you ever studied James Gates? http://theawakenment.com...