Evil proves God does not exist

Pro repeats ad nauseam that God can't have any reason to allow evil to exist. Repeating this assertion many times over makes it no more true than the person that repeats Jesus is lord ad nauseam on the street corner. Pro says "I can think of no rational excuse for why a morally perfect, all powerful being would allow evil to exist" What exactly is the argument here ? 1) I can't think of a rational excuse why God would allow evil 2) If there was a rational excuse I would of thought of it 3) Therefore there must be no rational reason for God allowing evil This is a non sequitur the conclusion doesn't follow the premise. Pros inability to fathom how God could allow evil to exist, no more proves Gods non existence than the flat earther who couldn't fathom how the world is a sphere, cause after all the people on the other side would just drop off ! !! ! Pro says "I can think of no such reason, and my opponent has not offered one. " I did offer one, you just didn't like it, your not liking it , is not a logical refutation. Pro says "I really don't see what's so hard to understand about this. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . : Gives a long speech on his perceived grievances in this debate, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Pro says "Con: In the next round, you must provide some reason why the God of Theism would allow evil to exist and justify it" Do I, what if I don't ? what is Pros argument ? 1) Con did not give a reason why God would allow suffering 2) Therefore there is no reason why God would allow suffering 3) Therefore evil proves God does not exist This is a non sequitur, the conclusion doesn't follow from the premise. My absent of argument would not prove that God does not exist due to evil. This is clearly fallacious. But just to show I am a good sport, I will expand on my free will defense. World 1) No capacity to do evil is given, thus evil does not exist World 2) Capacity to do evil is given, thus evil exists World 2 allows a choice to do good, where this could not happen in world 1. A good that is done out of choice is of higher value and more good than doing a good out of non choice. This is a possible justification for God allowing free will and evil to exist. 1. Evil exists. 2. If the God of Theism existed, he would not allow evil to exist. 2b It is impossible for God to have any reason to allow evil to exist 3. Therefore, the God of Theism does not exist. The question you have to ask is, has my opponent actually proved the impossibility of evil and God existing, or have they merely made the assertion that God can't exist if evil exists ? over and over and over and over. At the start of this debate the two sides were. .. .. "My opponent will argue that "Evil proves God does not exist" I will be arguing that the existence of evil does not prove Gods non existence. " My opponent has not proven the impossibility of God and evil existing, as such it is indeed possible that God could exist even if evil exists. Therefore. .. .. .. . 1) God existing and evil existing has not be shown to be mutually exclusive. 2) Therefore its possible that God exists even if evil exists. 3) Therefore the claim that "Evil proves Gods' non existence" is false. I once again remind everyone Pro repeats ad nauseam that God can't have any reason to allow evil to exist. Repeating this assertion many times over makes it no more true than the person that repeats Jesus is lord ad nauseam on the street corner.