The Christianity is a unique religion

As you are completely incorrect, Again, I am going to have to go through your comment like this: “Dude, the bible absolutely doesn’t say that the earth is spherical. You and all the other Christians who say otherwise are subjectively interpreting the bible to fit science because it scares your rational side that the bible is completely out of line with logic and reality. For that reason you accept these purely vague passages which could be interpreted multifariously.” - In this paragraph you say that all of those 100 lines of verses that say the earth is spherical are plain wrong. Then you go on to say that you somehow know that the Bible contradicts logic. But even worse than that you build on top of an assumption as to say how badly it was interpreted! Insults won’t win an argument. “Why are they vague? Because they never explicitly state the things you claim! Don’t believe me Then Why Didn’t Anyone In Ancient Rome Or Dark Age Europe Read Them And Come To The Same Conclusion?? Because they are NOT specifically worded, they are vague and subjective, I am a rational person who bases his beliefs in rationality, therefore I cannot and will not accept these scriptures as true; even if they were, Islam makes the same claims in the Quran so that doesn’t prove Christian god’s existence…..Lastly, Why in the hell would the bible be talking about the expansion of space? It’s irrelevant in a religious text. They sure as hell don’t talk about dinosaurs, evolution or even cavemen! Pretty out of place don’t you think??…” - No, Its not ‘vague’. “Circle” translated simply means “sphere” I have been answering all of your ‘questions’ yet you have been totally ignoring mine! are they too hard? I Will ask for the THIRD TIME: ANSWER these: Fossilized Jelly fish I ask again: Unfractured, Folded rock layers Fossilized bugs - while eating Sea Creatures Fossilized in the Himalayas Rapidly buried Plants Fossilized Fish - While eating Fossilized drowning animals Each of these MUST be buried by more than 10 metres of sediment, as small animals crawl around in the mud looking for dead animals - eating everything I will not simply sit here correcting all of your statements. Throughout my arguments you take out what you think you may have an answer to, but leave the hard ones thinking you have won!? The only word that fits is plain ignorant. As Paul said “Anyone who say’s God does not exist is a fool” Now I have come to see that verse in action… You are hanging on a thread called Horus, you say he is most similar to Jesus, well thank you that cleans up my work with you a bit! I will go through Ancient Egypt writings explaining Horus and his so called “virgin mother” The mother of Horus was believed to be the goddess Isis. Her husband, the god Osiris, was killed by his enemy Seth, the god of the desert, and later dismembered. Isis managed to retrieve all of Osiris’s body parts except for his phallus, which was thrown into the Nile and eaten by catfish. (I’m not making this up). Isis used her goddess powers to temporarily resurrect Osiris and fashion a golden phallus. She was then impregnated, and Horus was conceived. However this story may be classified, it is not a virgin birth. Jesus being tempted vs Horus fighting Seth Zeitgeist outlines the basis for this claim by explaining, “As does Satan with Jesus, Seth attempts to kill Horus. Set is the ‘god of the desert’ who battles Horus, while Jesus is tempted in the desert by Satan” Doing battle with the “god of the desert” is not the same as being tempted while alone in the desert; and according to the Gospel accounts, Satan did not attempt to kill Jesus there ( Matt. 4, Mark 1:12-13, Luke 4:1-13). The relationship between Horus and Seth in the ancient Egyptian religion was quite different than the relationship between Jesus and Satan. While Seth and Horus were often at odds with each other, it was believed that their reconciliation was what allowed the pharaohs to rule over a unified country. It was believed that the pharaoh was a “Horus reconciled to Seth, or a gentleman in whom the spirit of disorder had been integrated”. In stark contrast, there is never any reconciliation between Jesus and Satan in Scripture. Appearantly Horus Healed the sick, the blind, cast out demons, and walked on water. The Metternich Stella, a monument from the 4th century B.C., tells a story in which Horus is poisoned by Seth and brought back to life by the god Thoth at the request of his mother, Isis. The ancient Egyptians used the spell described on this monument to cure people. It was believed that the spirit of Horus would dwell within the sick, and they would be cured the same way he was. This spiritual indwelling is a far cry from the physical healing ministry of Christ. In short, Horus did not travel the countryside laying his hands on sick people and restoring them to health. Horus raised Asar from the dead. “Asar” translates to “Lazarus.” The name Osirus is a Greek transliteration of the Egyptian name Asar. Osirus is the father of Horus, and, according to the myth, he was killed by Seth and briefly brought back to life by Isis in order to conceive Horus. It was not Horus who raised “Asar” from the dead. It was his mother. The name Lazarus is ACTUALLY derived from the Hebrew word Eleazar meaning “God has helped.” This name was common among the Jews of Jesus’ time. In fact, two figures in the New Testament bear this name ( John 11, Luke16:19-31). Oh, yeah, he also had twelve disciples. Again, this claim finds its origin in the work of Gerald Massey (Ancient Egypt: The Light of the World, book 12), which points to a mural depicting “the twelve who reap the harvest.” But Horus does not appear in the mural. In the various Horus myths, there are indications of the four “Sons of Horus,” or six semi-gods, who followed him, and at times there were various numbers of human followers, but they never add up to twelve. Only Massey arrives at this number, and he does so only by referencing the mural with no Horus on it. So, Your Horus God resort is just plain wrong, I said it was wrong before but I didn’t want to explain, but you forced me to. Now, for your Carbon Dating Beliefs.. A critical assumption used in carbon-14 dating has to do with this ratio. It is assumed that the ratio of 14C to 12C in the atmosphere has always been the same as it is today (1 to 1 trillion). If this assumption is true, then the AMS 14C dating method is valid up to about 80,000 years. Beyond this number, the instruments scientists use would not be able to detect enough remaining 14C to be useful in age estimates. This is a critical assumption in the dating process. If this assumption is not true, then the method will give incorrect dates. What could cause this ratio to change? If the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere is not equal to the removal rate (mostly through decay), this ratio will change. In other words, the amount of 14C being produced in the atmosphere must equal the amount being removed to be in a steady state (also called “equilibrium”). If this is not true, the ratio of 14C to 12C is not a constant, which would make knowing the starting amount of 14C in a specimen difficult or impossible to accurately determine. So, lastly I ask (again) for you to explain: what do you believe?