RE: God's Existance

Con, first of all, I recommend you know your topic before you use it in an argument. 1. Your telling me that I am wrong when I have studied evolutionary science and bio molecular process for 4 years? And you evidence is some knock-off websites and you own opinion!? Bah! 2. I should just mention, my debate was over when it was over, YOU challenged me. 3. You accuse my argument of not meeting the burden of proof! On what grounds I ask!? Again, poor poor opinionated response. 4. If what you are implying is true, you believe in Theistic Evolution and therefore, prove to agree with my argument. And in that case, thank you Danger93 the second. 5. How can you be stunned when you don't understand my arguments!? (I promise to dumb them down for you from here on out). 6. Catholics are fools! They don't even know what they are talking about! They don't even believe in the Bible! What kind of resource are they!? 7. I should point out, Hydrogen is a very complex molecule, I suggest you research it and then come back (If you know it you will see your comments about it don't make any sense) 8. I never said Helium became the first cells! Evolutionists did :) 9. When you made the comment about the light beams I showed my professor we all had a big laugh, so thanks! 10. You also suggest we came from stars (which you mention the sentence before is made of Helium!) 11. This next one really gets me, and I quote "This explanation does exist, but as my space is limited I cant give you proper justice" Bahahahahahaha!!!!! How convenient! lol 12. You never did explain to me the part about the eyes, you just said to "Google" it, how professional might I add. I encourage ALL readers of this debate to "Google" this so you too can see the evidence that does not exist. Maybe you can show me some quotes from wikipedia next! 13. Then you try to be funny.....I guess? By saying to Google (there's that term again) relevant and alternative arguments? If that was a joke, I recommend "googling" what makes a good joke. 14. Next you tell me that Stellar fusion is a verified theory, hmmm.....I missed this one on the news...... 15. Then you try to throw out some "god names" Yahweh and Jehovah and Allah. 16. Then you stupidly admit that its a "fortunate thing you don't have to prove the origin of life". I agree, because you couldn't. 17. You bring premises that are not true. 18. You bring some "Animals in Genesis" contextual error. If you look up the definition of "formed" in the Hebrew context, you will see it can also mean "call or called". 19. You are misunderstood. Man and Woman were created separately that verse is a clarification. 20. I am Christian, not Islamic, this means I reject the Koran, I also should point out that even Islamics reject the new testament. If you knew what you were talking about, you could see this. 21. I had a great time shining light on your misunderstandings, fallacies, and silly truths. 22. I ALSO JUST LOVE HOW YOU ADMIT THAT THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF GOD BUT I SHOULD REMIND YOU THAT AS CON IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO DENY, NOT CONSIDER, THIS TRUTH. 23. Now lets take a good look at your resources: Pandasthumb (that sounds reliable), talkorigins, evilbible (hmm creepy), skeptics anonymous lol, and answeringislam (I'm not Islamic?). I hope these fallacies entertain you as much as they did me and my class! My professor urged me to point out to you that the word "existence" in your title for this debate, is spelled wrong. It's "existence" not "existance". Well Con, you have disappointed me greatly. I was hoping for an argument but I have been let down. I only accept debates from educated, qualified, individuals which you have proven not to be. I usually end the debate by this point, but because you are SO entertaining and my class is enthused, I will continue. So I say again, Con please take a stand and stop pretending to be smart! --I hope you have as fun as I did although I have a feeling you wont. And remember, oppose my topic this time, don't agree with me!