Liberials are identical to Nazis when it comes to the issue of abortion

Good point. But the idea of a genocide and an abortion are very different, as one is forced, actively done on already grown up people, and targeting a specific ethnic/religious group, while abortion simply targets the unborn.I do agree with Pro on the resemblance of Liberal mustaches. This is particularly true in the case of Mrs Clinton.:)But, outside of the debate and my technical, nit picky self, I'd still say Pro is wrong to regard the resolution as true. Here's my thought process, feel free to comment and critique.The Holocaust may not have been a purely political maneuver on Hitler's part, but it certainly did it's job incredibly well as it served to rally the necessary voting block. In a way, the post-war democracy established in Germany, combined with the post-war tensions, allowed this to happen. This included lots of animosity towards Jews, for whatever reason, and Hitler merely capitalized on this tension to get into power. His voting block constituted the fascist party, and so he focused himself on pleasing them even if doing so meant harming other voting blocks. Because all he needed was their vote. And, who knows, maybe the reach people that financed the campaign disliked Jews too.Eliminating Jews afterwards was also a good political move. It made sure that Jews couldn't vote against him, in case there were more elections. It wouldn't do to have dissent in your country anyway, even without elections. In a way, it was as if the USA had been killing anyone opposed to the Vietnam war, which would essentially breed a country that loves war.This is what Hitler did. Political eugenics, and even some real eugenics thrown in too. The Liberal party is doing something a bit different. Their voting block, as we know, is formed by the city-dwellers, who are generally pro-choice. They made the correct political move by absolutely ignoring the rest of america (admittedly the minority by population), because they knew that that voting block alone could get them into power.They actually are doing eugenics too, in a sense. The population explosion that poor people should be having is dulled by a LOT, and political eugenics by the fact that they are killing their own potential voting block. Great short-term strategy, but expect the democrats to fall within 30, 40 years.It would also make sense for Liberals to preform independent political eugenics. Ever notice how many abortions people get? Who pays for all of that? Us? The government? The people who want to get the abortion?In a sense, all three, but that's a bit too deep for now. All that's important is that, well, planned parenthood is getting a lot of money. And because planned parenthood works with other companies, both as a buyer of materials and seller of body organs, lots of people are making lots of money. And a big portion of that money should, if the correct political move is being played here, be going right back to the dem party, so they can advertise for abortion. Self-sustaining machine, at least for now.I guess Hitler advertised in this way too. They are a bit similar. Is there any databases with the numbers for raw production of materials by concentration camps?But keep in mind that all parties are like this. The GOP resists abortion specifically because its voting block hates it, and because the big companies that finance it aren't like the city tech companies. They farm and manufacture. Those companies need the low-skilled wage as low down as it can get, and abortion is preventing them from getting a whole lot of money.Ever wondered why Trump had to finance his own campaign?Anyway, Conservatives are pretty brainwashed too, arguably more, on ideas like immigration. The companies don't mind, since they can import workers as "guests" and then pretty much enslave them in any system, and the voting block really cares. NOw that I think about it, it may not even be brainwashing. There's not enough incentive. You can rally a voting block on better things, surely.Anyhow, there's a lot of things that can be compared to other bad things. This doesn't mean they're wrong, of course. Did you know that, by definition, our two presidential candidates were terrorists, because they spread terror of the other side to achieve political goals?Thanks for reading anyway.