The Christian bible and god are responsible for the presence of morality

My opponent is so clever at quoting my words out of context that I am absolutely convinced he has some background in journalism. Before I proceed to dismantle my opponent's argument, however, there is one point in particular that needs to be addressed. Let me assure my opponent that I indeed read the premise of the debate and that I also read his introduction, in which he states that he is "prepared to move in the natural direction this debate takes" and that "This topic has a large scope after all so I do not wish to restrict any approach my opponent may wish to take"" Ironically shocking, after I presented an incontrovertibly impregnable argument, my opponent is expressing "bewilderment" and saying that my argument is "worrying." These comments are truly comical and frankly, I am please with the discomfort that my argument ingrained into my opponent"s mind. To recapitulate, in round one, my initial argument is that Christianity is responsible for the vast majority of society"s morality. In an effort to prove the validity of my argument, I represented countries that have a Christian minority population and cite the barbarism that is practice in these countries: beheading, "enslavement, torture, rape, forced abortions and persecution on political, racial and religious grounds, guards clubbing starving children to death for stealing rice," and human trafficking from North Korea to China, just to name a few. I then compare these immoral nations to Christian majority nation, illustrating that Christian majority nations do not practice these wicked extremities, but to the contrary, provide humanitarian aids to countries around the world. I then proceed by asking my opponent to kindly "...cite countries, with a Christian majority population, that practice similar atrocities to" North Korea, Syria, Pakistan, and China, which are all Christian minority nations. Instead of satisfying my "kindly" request, my opponent obliviously reinforces my argument. Allow me to illustrate my opponent"s fatal mistake. He mentions that "The 2005 United Nations Human Development Report shows that Denmark, Switzerland, Norway, Belgium and Japan, to name a few, are among the least religious societies on earth yet have the lowest numbers of homicide per capita." My opponent did not provide his source, depriving me of the pleasure of confirming his report. Another Very critical information that my opponent failed to mention is that Denmark is a Christian majority nation; 78% of its religious body are Christians. Switzerland is a Christian majority nation. Christianity makes up 76% of the country"s religious body. Norway is a Christian majority nation; 76.1% of its religious body are Christians. Belgium is a Christian majority country. My opponent"s argument has just crumple like a falling building. He proves my point. The countries that he mentions, with the exception of Japan, are all Christian majority countries. Another interesting point that I want to address is a preposterous assertion made by opponent, stating: "He also mentions the death of children to garner sympathy for his own stance." Frankly, I think this a monstrous accusation. To suggest that I mentioned the death of children to gamer sympathy for my stance, as if the gruesome slaughtering and clubbing of children is irrelevant, sinks deep into my heart, and have me wondering if my opponent, an audacious atheist, has the slightest trace of morality in his bone, or a drop of sympathy for these innocent children. My opponent has not refuted my argument; he merely strengthens it. I will like to address how my opponent misquote me, but I have insufficient characters remaining. please provide source. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Denmark http://www.indexmundi.com... www.indexmundi.com " Factbook " Countries " Norway http://www.swissworld.org...