Refuting Theist_1998 on Big Bang Cosmogony

I would just like to ask if the website and Dr Hovind words are the same what's the point of going to the video its just taking more time to watch it come up with a reply when instead you could just read the info from the website and reply. If the big bang happened 18-20 billion years ago what difference does it make, also I wouldn't trust Wikipedia as a source of information because someone who has the wrong information can just log in a edit the text. Also you're not using my source. How do you know the age of the universe is 12-14 billion years old you've just attempted to correct me with no justification. My source doesn't have a time stamp of 6:55 so I have no idea what you're talking about and if the text Dr Hovind gave is unreadable go to my source. "The periods in the above quote is where the image of the textbook cuts out the words. However, it's clear that this is discussing a spinning *nebula* and has absolutely nothing to do with the Big Bang. What sort of person confuses the origin of the sun with the origin of the universe? Yes, that's a rhetorical question. Obviously Kent Hovind does". Excuse me you're debating 'me' not Kent Hovind. You say there's a difference between expansion and explosion hinting that there was no explosion but the going on to say it exploded. "Now imagine that you decide to pop the balloon with a pin, which results in the balloon exploding. The former of these two scenarios is analogous to the Big Bang". Not knowing where the energy came from is like saying a can be built without the necessary materials or workforce the theory just falls flat on its face. Instead of refereeing me to a book why don't you just state some points. Again my source doesn't have time stamps. And since Thermodynamics is a complex and time consuming topic why don't we star it now Q1. how does the big bang theory come about even though it completely forgets the first law of thermodynamics "matter cannot be created or destroyed" Q2. And the second law of thermodynamics co-exist with the theory of the big bang theory "Everything tends towards disorder" So rather than the chaos (big bang) becoming ordered (our universe), just the opposite would be true.. And it is. Our complex universe is wearing down, and becoming more chaotic... Paul was aware of this when he wrote his letter to the Hebrews: Everything ".. waxes old like a garment" (quoted in both Psalm 102:25-27, and also Hebrews 1:10-12). "This verse "anticipates the famous second law of thermodynamics, or law of entropy, indicating that everything in the physical universe is growing old and wearing out. God created everything in the beginning, winding it up like a great clock, so to speak. Because of sin and the curse, however, it has been running down and "perishing" ever since. Jesus also said: "Heaven and earth shall pass away" (literally, "are passing away") (Matthew 24:35)" - Waxing Old, like a Garmet. Things wear down. Nothing gets better by itself. If I told you that thousands of pieces of timber were set in motion by a tornado in a lumberyard and this ultimately resulted in the amazing design and complexity of the house you live in, you would think this was absurd to say the very least. Yet in essence this is what the Big Bang theory teaches. So my last question is what is your answer to what I've just said?.