Homosexuality is natural and morally correct. Homophobia is morallly incorrect.

I A. Why is homosexuality correct based on love if incest and pedophilia are too? Homosexuality is love between two human beings. Incest creates biological and social problems. Pedophilia psychologically hurts children. These acts hurt people. Straight love is morally justified and encouraged. There is no reason gay love should not be. I B. The two examples you mention make a person sad and a person happy. Homosexual love makes everybody happy in the act. It is reciprocal. I C. I don't understand your point. Gay marriage will lead to more adoptions and more families, which is a good moral thing. It is an act of kindness and generosity to another human being what could be more moral? II. Morality cannot exist if a choice is not made. The act of engaging in homosexual love is moral, which is the choice. III. Leviticus 18:22; 20:13 A. Leviticus is a holiness code written 3,000 years ago. This code includes many prohibitions against round haircuts, wearing garments of mixed fabrics, and even playing with the skin of a pig. (There goes football!)In this case, these laws were written for priests only, and its primary intent was to set the priests of Israel over and against priests of other cultures. B. Levitcus 20:2 starts off with "'And unto the sons of Israel thou dost say..." C. This code is not meant for all humans, but rather just for Israeli priests at the time. IV. What does a child say when he is asked about his mother/father, when he does not have one? A. He will say the truth. Many kids grow up without both parents. He is lucky to have both. It is not harmful that one of them does not have certain sex organs. That is irrelevant to the child's well-being. B. Many people grow up with one parent or a feminine father or masculine mother. The fact that a person does not embrace a certain stereotype does not make them ill-equipped to be a parent. C. NO SCIENTIFIC SOURCE WILL SAY THAT GAY PARENTS CANNOT DO AS GOOD A JOB AS STRAIGHT PARENTS! Here are some SCIENTIFIC sources to back this up: [http://www. apa. org/ pi/lgbc/policy/parents. html] [http://www. urban. org/ publications/411437. html] [http://www. healthyminds. org/ glbissues. cfm] V. Homosexuality involves homosexual love, which is moral: choice or not. VI. Agreed. [He dropped his point!] VII. I said that homosexual love is not morally neutral for adoption, love, and reciprocal happiness. These are all morally correct! VIII. A. The Bible says that judging others is wrong many times. (James 4:11) "Do not criticize each other, brothers. Whoever makes it his habit to criticize his brother or to judge his brother is judging the law and condemning the law. But if you condemn the law, you are not a doer of the law but its judge." The law has the right to judge. Not people. B. Homophobia is morally wrong it leads to people being unhappy and typically verbal and physical violence, which is immoral. IX. Ugh...Whatever! X. Violence is immoral. Not homophobia. A. Judging has proven to be immoral. You cannot engage in homophobia without judging. B. Prejudice is immoral because it involves judging, which is immoral. It also leads to violence, which makes it potentially immoral. C. Homophobia is defined as prejudice or antipathy for homosexuality, This is different from not liking a certain type of girl. Homophobia is prejudice, by definition. D. Leviticus 18; 20 This has been disproven earlier in the debate. XI. This was hardly a debate. It was based on twisting my words and small differences in definition. I'm calling future potential abuse, which is an argument that states that if you vote against him it will show that it is wrong and bad for debate to debate in this way. Eventually, he should stop debating in this way if he realizes it is not working and is only detremental to the activity of debate. Thank you. Vote PRO for the better debater. And for the better position.