If colin leslie dean debating his book is SPAM then so is JK Rowling' debating her new book SPAM

Actuallly, my opponent isn't realising what the resolution is. The resolution is that if J.K Rowling would come here to debate her work it would be spam as opposed to Dean. He then tries to change the definition of spam to make it include self promotion, something not even mentioned in the definition:"irrelevant or unsolicited messages sent over the Internet, typically to large numbers of users, for the purposes of advertising, phishing, spreading malware, etc."" If Rowling where to try and discuss her work here it would differ from Dean in the key aspect that she would actually be able to discuss it with someone as the odds of someone actually knowing the work she wants to debate are much greater. The key difference is that Rowling would come here and could actually use the DDO platform to discuss her work and offer new insights into it. She would actually be able to come and discuss this without needing to link to it, without having to advertise it per say and wouldn't need to appear under a third person name. However, Dean is not able to come here to discuss his work without actually advertising it. Given the HP universe is so popular and so diverse she could discuss it in a plethora of ways. Google shows that the term “Harry Potter” has been brought up on at least 180 occasions on DDO, and Rowling at least 3060 Times, indicating that there is a constant drive to discuss and debate her and her work. If Rowling would come along and start debating her own topic we would not notice, for it would just be another drop in the sea, she would not even make a dent, it wouldn't be irrelivent for she wouldn't be advertising, she would actually be discussing. However, Dean's name is mentioned around 140 times in DDO, and albeit that might seem like it would be signs of his discussion value removing all results that include your username (-shakuntala) leaves us with 7 results. Out of 144 discussion threads, debates, polls and opinions you have started or contributed to 137, meaning that you're the key component of the entire Dean regime. If Rowling where to start discussing her own book on DDO the total number of threads that are not associated with the account she has here would still be in such a massive majority to the threads she actually might start that we could barely notice her. It would just be another debater that insists on debating Rowlings work, for there are plenty of them already. If we were to remove her from DDO all together and there would still be a plethora of topics concerning her work. If you were to leave DDO all together Dean would vanish from existence as far as DDO would go. We'd remember you for perhaps a week and after that not a single soul still on DDO would actually care to remember his work, his poetry, and his shakuntala account. He would be gone, erased from DDO excistance. Nobody would discuss him, nobody would attempt to promote his poetry and nobody would keep on creating debates to further his poetry. It's all you. You're the only one that is actually promoting him. 137 sites exist directly and indirectly advertising Dean from your hand. You are spamming, your forcing deans poems, philosophy, mathematical theorems e.t.c into a discussion platform that has again and again shown that it does not want It. There is absolutely no will on DDO to discuss this topic in any positive way and no will to discuss this outside your account. It's self promotion because nobody else is promoting it. Rowling is not going to fit that definition because she does not need to promote herself, her work is promoted by her fans, it is promoted by itself and it's discussable nature. You're fighting for a dying case. The more you try to force Dean onto an audience that does not want it the more of an annoyance is Dean going to become. He has next to nothing to discuss about his work that doesn't require him to actually post the work itself alongside the discussion because, suprise suprise, nobody has a clue what he is talking about without it. Rowling is discussable, Dean isn't. The resolution is not going to fall your way simply because Rowling isn't forcingly advertising herself to gain some recognition. Dean is. Rowling doesn't need to advertise her work. Dean has to. Rowling actually has material that people are willing to discuss. Dean does not. Rowling is already discussed. Dean isn't. Rowling isn't spamming herself all over the internet. Dean is. https://www.google.is... https://www.google.is...