Abortion Is Good For Society

I was never penalized for conduct because the website moderators know that arguments can get heated up to the point that people will start to take it personally. This is especially true with controversial topics; religion, morals, and ethics; and also politics. Besides, it's not like I am using profanity, offensive language, threats, discrimination, or other unaccepted behavior in a controversial debate like this one, so let us continue and move on. I know that you never said it and the dictionary said it. Gee, maybe I was being too metaphorical or something? Do I seriously have to stoop myself so low to writing in literal, concrete terms so that you can understand me? Come on, you can't be that stupid if you have a high knowledge of astrophysics and biology, right? (Or not, LOL) The reason why I am arguing and admitting that unorganic things like suns and rocks are alive is to prove to you that if you consider a fetus to have life, then so can those things. How about you stop stealing my arguments that I have never even used yet! Anyways, you claim that a fetus is alive, yet those aren't; are you that illogical? It's exactly like how Christians and Jews believe in demons and devils, but not ghosts? What? And no, I will not be explaining that metaphor for you. You can go figure it out on your own, Mr. I Know More Than You But Not Know Crap About Metaphors! I am saying what you just said as a contradiction that I can use against you! (Are you that off-topic?) Since you said an egg is not an organism and, thus, not a living thing, that clearly proves that a fetus is not a living thing, as it comes from an egg which isn't a living thing and is still inside the womb. Wait, so you do admit eggs are not living things... Okay, I pretty much won this debate because we both agree that an egg is not life so aborting a fetus is completely just and moral. But for the sake of my rebuttal, I will continue arguing even though I have virtually won when you made that confession. You keep mentioning about seconds, but when exactly does an egg become fertilized to become human-like? At the mili-second? At the split-second? At the tenth of a second? At the hundredth of a second? At the thousandth of a second? At the micro-second? At the nano-second? At the sub-nano second? You have to be extremely specific. Same with when a fetus exits the womb or 30 seconds before or still being hatched to the umbilical cord. When exactly? Stop making false assumptions about such things if you can't even tell time properly! There you go, you are now starting to agree with me more and more, despite me already winning after you made that egg confession earlier (though the voting will say otherwise sadly). You say I am circular reasoning but you contradicted yourself yet again! Do you have a habit of contradicting yourself or you doing this on purpose? You do circular reasoning to with the first paragraph of your argument. And no, I am not your mommy (pun intended) go figure it out on your own. By your very inaccurate logic, you're basically saying that if a fetus can move and that indicates it is life, then so can the sun, so can islands, so can the continents of this planet, so can the planets in this solar system, so can celestial objects, so can black-holes, motor vehicles, and pretty much anything that can move naturally or artificially. I find it funny how you contradict yourself so many times. I admit I do the same, but at least I'm trying to avoid it. You say that is protected by law, but what about in other countries besides in North America. What about Europe? What about the Russian Federation? What about Asia? What about Africa? What about Latin-America? What about Australia? Wjat about Oceania? What about the small islands? And you say if the fetus is 4 to 40 weeks, so if I purposely murder a woman's child at week 3, day 7, 23rd hour, 59th minute, 59th second, and 1 nano second before it becomes 4 weeks, then I am pretty much scot-free even with evidence, witnesses, lawyers, and law right? You are never precise with the time, only accurate; it's better to be precise in these kinds of situations. I have already refuted the third claim, and if you don't believe me after checking, you must be smoking crack. And I have already refuted the fifth claim as well. To be honest, I already refuted those in my previous arguments, but you must be stupid or something to overlook these small tiny details. Since you were kind enough to list my errors, then I will thank you by listing yours and hopefully you can win this debate even though I have already won at this point: 1. You make many contradiction statements 2. You do circular reasoning yourself 3. You lack understanding of metaphorical statements 4. You miss tiny details that makes you fell superior Now I hope to see my opponent's responses, but the voters will most likely choose you because I have emotionally offended them. I have technically won this debate no matter what arguments you bring up as you yourself agree with my main arguments, but the voting will say otherwise. I know I will lose for sure because of those voters, but whatever...