BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Videos for people is a good Youtube channel.

About a month ago, I started debates about this thing, and ever since then, I've had to keep making new ones, because my opponents are inept. Please debate thoroughly and pose engaging questions. I look forward to our argument. Your round one argument will be the counter argument to the following: Videos for people is the best Youtube channel I have ever uncovered. It's entertaining. When I see one of his videos, I laugh, I cry, and so on. His videos attract me. I am drawn to them like a moth to a porch light. I don't know why, but I like them. He has a zany sense of humor and a firm grasp of the world around him. He is a hidden genius. I have never seen any videos like his and I don't think there ever will be anything like his. They are completely unique. They are so funny that I can't stop laughing. I don't know who he is, or what he's doing, but I can identify with him. His videos are unique. They are done using stick figures. The stick figures are badly drawn, and created using MS paint, but their quality isn't what matters. What matters, really, is what they do. They do hilariously funny things. they do romantic stuff, funny stuff. Nothing is too insane for this guy to tackle. Every video seems more bizarre than the last. But, although his videos are weird, they still seem somewhat normal, so the viewer isn't removed from reality. He uses normal language in his writing. There isn't any dialogue, only music. everything is written. His videos are the better than anything else I have ever seen. I am a devoted fan to the way he interprets things. Every video of his resonates with me. Videos for people is a genius. I don't know who he is, and I have no desire to uncover his identity. Knowing his identity isn't necessary to enjoy anything he makes. He's quirky, and I enjoy his videos. I await your first argument. Good luck!
Corporal punishment (Caning) should be implemented in the legal system of America

Ok, so sorry for the delay, I had school exams and stuff but their almost over. First, some definitons and background info: Corporal Punishment is the infliction of physical pain as a consequence of a criminal offence. By Singaporean law, Corporal Punishment can only be sentenced to a male offender between the ages of 18 and 50 who has been certified to be in a fit state of health by a medical officer. Juveniles may also be sentenced to Corporal Punishment, but to no more than 10 strokes. Offenders below the age of 16 can only be sentenced by the High Court and State Courts. Anyway, Corporal punishment IS an effective crime deterrent. The fundamental basis of deterrence from anything is: If you do this, bad things will happen to you. Since imprisonment in itself isn't a good deterrent and the effects of a criminal record on your future career options is intangible, Corporal Punishment represents a direct incentive to refrain from crime due to the physical pain caused. The medical effects can be viewed here:https://en.wikipedia.org... I would also like to state that caning is not taken likely by the judicial system in Singapore. Singaporean law allows caning to be ordered for over 35 offences, including hostage-taking/kidnapping, robbery, gang robbery with murder, drug abuse, vandalism, extortion, rioting, sexual abuse, and unlawful possession of weapons. Caning is also a mandatory punishment for certain offences such as rape, drug trafficking, illegal money-lending, and for visiting foreigners who overstay their visa by more than 90 days (a measure designed to deter illegal immigrant workers). Furthermore, it is illegal to cane women, Men above the age of 50, offenders deemed medically unfit by a medical officer and offenders who have been sentenced to death.
Corporal punishment (Caning) should be implemented in the legal system of America

Greetings to my opponent and the audience reading this debate. Round 1 is reserved for acceptance and laying down the framework for discussion. I will be arguing that reformative and/or rehabilitative treatment is preferable to corporal punishment. The latter is an inferior crime deterrent, and promotes more problematic concepts of justice. Moreover, corporal punishment is not the only alternative to the status quo. I look forward to an interesting and thought provoking discussion with Pro. Thanks!
Corporal punishment (Caning) should be implemented in the legal system of America

Hi all, I will be making a stand for Corporal punishment. You Americans got really bent out of shape when Singapore caned Michael Fay 12 years ago, I'd like to see the American stance on caning. 1st argument purely for accepting the challenge You may state your substantives. My substantives are: 1) It is an effective crime deterrent 2) Cases are not done publicly 3) Conditions are kept humane
Single-sex schools are better than multi-sex

I'm drawing a blank and for whatever reason can't think of the word for more than one gender.What I'm talking about is the idea that schools with one gender (male/female) are more beneficial to their students than schools that have both genders.I am against this idea.Schools should have both genders. I will go into more detail once Pro accepts.I have made this a short debate as it is a topic for University that I am discussing and would enjoy if someone would entertain argument quickly so I can get both sides of the coin.Thanks in advance for anyone who accepts!
Single-sex schools are better than multi-sex

Okay, let's begin with some arguments in support of single-sex schools (SSS).Gender-BiasAs numerous studies show{1}, teachers of one gender are inherently biased towards students of the same gender. Whether it be in-class favoritism, or grading regarding their personal liking of the student, it is difficult to argue that bias is an issue. In a co-ed classroom and school, this gender bias will be even more noticeable and will have a negative effect on student learning. DistractionOf course, even as my opponent admits to, there is a distraction in class when it comes to male-female relationships. This not only affects student who are involved in this relationship, but those outside as well. Seeing a couple flirting in the back of the classroom definitely takes away from the optimal learning environment. Even when trying to avoid these relationships, people, including myself at times, will try to act their best simply to impress the opposite gender. Once again, this takes away from the learning experience. However, from personal experience with friends, I can attest to the fact that an all-male school is much more comfortable. The following is a real quote from my friend (almost exact) : "Dude, the classes are so laid back. The teachers are so chill." In his school, which will not be named, the all boy environment helps him and his classmates remain focused, without having to worry about how they smell, or why the girl beside them just touched their arm. The following in-depth article{2} highlights the important factors when considering a similar resolution, and conclude that single-sex schools are better in terms of academic performance. Finally, my opponent, as many others have in the past, tries to argue that the real world will be co-ed, so the classroom should be as well. This, however, is a flawed argument. There are so many different factors involved between school and the real life. In addition, students who attend a single-sex school do not face anymore difficulty in finding a partner; one has to realize that these people will be out of the house/school and will get to see the opposite gender in many places in public. In conclusion, single-sex schools are shown to be better for academic performance, as seen in numerous studies. SSS allow students, especcially high-schoolers with the "raging hormones", to perform without distraction. Students are more focused, and learn to enjoy and appreciate that environment. I rest my case. Thanks for this debate.{1} http://www.education.com...{2} http://www.apa.org...
Single-sex schools are better than multi-sex

Thanks for accepting, Shadow! And thanks for clarifying rules and tradition on this site.I grew up in Co-Ed (thanks again, David) schools, and at first I found it to be somewhat of a distraction (with dating and peer pressure and stuff like that) but once I graduated, started working, and attending post-secondary, I quickly realized how essential co-ed schooling is. School (primarily elementary and secondary) is not strictly for academic education. Although it is the main purpose, and necessary primarily through elementary, school is a "kick-starter" for the real world. We grow up with people of the same age range, learn communication skills and how to interact with others, as well as dating and relationships; something necessary to the advancement of the human race.If one wants to strictly study one subject, they are not able to in secondary school, as one must pass all mandatory courses (math, science, English, etc) as well. When you graduate secondary school, you can go on to college or university to study further what you would like to major in, and by that time, you have most likely made up your mind regarding a career path. Elementary school is good for learning the basic fundamentals of academics such as math and sciences, as well as English, but secondary schools help a lot more with the social aspect of living.Secondary school introduces us to dating and relationships, as we're hitting and passing puberty, and readies us for actual relationships when we're out of secondary school and actually adults. Secondary school is a much more social aspect of the education system, and allows us to be a bit more social and accepts more "mature" aspects of our cultures. To deny us the ability to interact with the opposite sex until we're 18 (or around there) on a regular basis doesn't prepare anyone for the real world and ends up screwing a lot of people over, as they don't know how to interact with people in order to pursue a relationship. Although you could argue that we don't need to start a relationship right when we're out of secondary, I could simply say we don't need to find a job right when we're out of secondary. I didn't have a job for about a year and a half after, but dated girls and became more comfortable interacting with them (secondary helped) and prepared myself more for when I want to have a family and continue the human race (except not on a grand of a scale as that sounds.)Advancing the human race is more important than being a lawyer. Sooner is better than later, and to not allow us to at least prepare for that in a somewhat unnecessary environment (secondary school) is ridiculous and detrimental to our growth as a species with the ability to reason.Thanks again for accepting and again for clarifying some things about this site! Looking forward to hearing your side of this.
Donald Trump is not fit to be President of the United States

I believe and support the fact that Donald Trump is not fit to be in any position of authority. Especially if that position is the president of this country, he has views that are self-destructive and I think if put under the pressure of being the president will destroy this country even more than it already is. Now I am not here to not be open I am here to take in facts. So if you are for Donald prove me wrong please.
Donald Trump is not fit to be President of the United States

Thank you, anamarie345, for instigating this debate.Counter Arguments"I believe and support the fact that Donald Trump is not fit to be in any position of authority. Especially if that position is the president of this country, he has views that are self-destructive and I think if put under the pressure of being the president will destroy this country even more than it already is."Here my opponent provides bare assertions, in that the claims of "self-destructive" views, and "pressure" on Mr Trump leading to the destruction of the country, without providing any evidence [1]. Therefore, this argument holds no weight in proving the resolution, due to its logically fallacious nature."Now I am not here to not be open I am here to take in facts. So if you are for Donald prove me wrong please."I have addressed the above argument, and exposed it as logically fallacious. Therefore, thus far, my opponent's wishes of being proven wrong have been granted. You're welcome =)References[1] http://dictionary.sensagent.com...
This House would monetize water

Good Afternoon Con! I accept your challenge and will be arguing that This House Should Monetize Water. Thank you for your arguments! In this round, Pro will be arguing that water can and should be monetized. But before I begin, you seem to have missed out several definitions. Thus, I shall attempt to define the terms used in this argument in accordance to what you have argued already [Definitions] Water: the clear liquid that has no color, taste, or smell, that falls from clouds as rain, that forms streams, lakes, and seas, and that is used for drinking, washing, etc. Monetization (Monetize): to utilize (something of value) as a source of profit In this argument, I will first be bringing up new points of argument and, as this is the first round, will not be rebutting any of Con's arguments While there is no doubt of the necessity of water for human life and society, to argue that it should be absolutely free is unrealistic and disastrous. While seemingly abundant and easy to obtain, water is not a simple commodity to procure. While heavily dependent on the geography of the country in question, water can be scarce and costly to produce. In a nation state such as Singapore, drinking water has to be imported from the neighboring country of Malaysia or produced through the desalination of sea water, both of which are costly processes. This has resulted in the country developing a new method of producing drinking water, reverse osmosis. This is my first point, that the monetization of water results in the incentive for the advancement of science, which is of the utmost importance as we consume more and more of our limited water supply. Not only will this improve our ability to produce fresh water, but also our science and technology as a whole. tl;dr Water is hard to produce, monetization produces the incentive to find new ways to expand our water supply and ultimately forward science and technology.
This House would monetize water

Good day, The resolution that stands before us today is THW monetize water and we on side opp strongly disagree. For the reasons I will now state for you. 1. Water is a human right Water is a human right we should not be able to sell it just as we do net sell air This is absolutely ridiculous water is a right not a product we can sell We need water to survive and so we should be monitoring the use of water not Selling it 2. What about less privleged people What happens in third world countries where people can barely afford food and homes never mind the price of water wich by the way is 1Million times the price of tap water. people are dying from no clean water and we want to sell it to them? This is infair and unjust. 3. There is no garuntee of cleanliness Bottled water is often just tap water that is slightly filtered and given a fancy package plus there is still no garuntee that the water provided will be 100% pure and clean no matter what it says on the package people can still keep dying of these water realated parasites and even worse they will be paying for something that could make them sick or even worse kill them This is absolutely unjust and inhumane 4. What about Corp.s If we allow Corparations to gain such a huge resource such as water what is gaurenteeing that they won't take control and make it almost imossible to get enough water We cannot risk this happening For all the reasons I have just stated and many more this resolution Must and SURLEY will FALL Thank you
Rap Battle 4

i got nothing left to say, no more words to spit, it's clear i've won, my opponent's fulla bullsh!t. i mean c'mon, in this battle he never had a place in, a rapper beatin' infam0us could never be A-SIN (asian), because it's only impossible, not improbable, rhyme schemes, punchlines, and my lines all logical. so now that it's over, i would contend, that the win is mine is 'cuz pro CAN'T win.
Rap Battle 4

Listen here sonny You need to go out and buy yourself a book to read its called "rapping for dummies" cause this man has got no skill your rap sucks so bad it would seem the audience took sleeping pills You really need to pick up the book cause then you will know Buddha was real Your just a fake white boy with no sex appeal I don't care what you compare yourself to, a pigeon a bulldog or a shitzu I'm Chinese and where I come from, everything you wanna be we eat you Your just like a dictator and to follow the same pattern most of the world hates you Time for you to put a bullet to your head like Hitler did in world war 2 Don't at like this defeat came at a shock I'm am the only dawg born to rock the spot I stole none of your rhymes You just wish your rhymes could could sound as good as mine You stand and folks leave No surprise you couldn't even pay me to hear you spit on the scene Just like the side I rep i'm a pro You conning everybody saying you gonna win, cause it ain't so you beating me would be as good as winning the lottery The chances are 1 in a million meaning in a million times imma beat you like battery Your just a sick man who can't think of anything but child pornography You probably get a stiffy when you see the site's ad for Zwinky Cause b!tches laught at you when they see you D!ck is smaller than their pinky If your raps ever sounded good it would be some jedi trickery Because infamous i just ain't feelin it I hope you don't choke like your last fight because you just ain't bringing it Nobody would blame you if you ran away A white boy in the rap game was never meant to stay So give up this is the last round Another victory for this bunny is coming around
Rap Battle 4

you think i'm fat? you're confused, see, if you knew rap, you'd know that pic is of vinnie P. what kind of rapper doesn't know 'bout JMT? that's embarrassing, so you'll have to excuse me. what's really whack is how you f*ckin' steal my rhymes, the final four lines of your fourth verse were all mine. i understand it's hard to battle and challenge me, you just need to accept the brutal reality, that i'm infamous for hate, no need to debate - i'm great, you could go back in time but still be too late. i'll slam your head into a bible and make you feel faith, like a surreal contradiction your rap is real fake. it was my innate jurisdiction to seal your fate. imagine you in a rap buffet, listen to that, you could eat it all but it wouldn't make your rhymes phat. you could puke it all up and take a sloppy green sh!t, masturb@te to child p0rn, yet you still wouldn't be sick. you could jump all in it, roll around, ya heard me. get down and bathe in it but it wouldn't make you rap dirty. my punchlines are straight raw and yours are plain nerdy. your eyes and ears are gonna bleed for approaching me, the only reason you say listen closely is 'cuz your speech is ghostly, death, murder, killin', that's what my rap is mostly, when i stand up in the streets, all the folks leave. and talkin' bout women, you shouldn't even have the speaker, yup, you're like dessert before dinner - you're sweet but don't even fill her up! so now i'm WRAPPIN' it up, go ahead and call me rude, uh, i got more knowledge than your imaginary buddha! you a little chihuahua and son, i'm a bulldog. went to the rap buffet but the truth is that i'm full, dawg. yo, you can't beat me, can't ever defeat me, like an omnipotent dictator - can't ever impeach me! you a rabbit in a cage, i'm the owner who sell it, i don't care if your not hungry, i'll still leave ya fulla PELLETS!
Rap Battle 4

Ay yo infamous why they call you that? I guess your widely known for having raps that sound like crap Look don't get it confused about winning rap 3 I'm undefeated nobody's beaten me, you see? Talking about Kobe? B!tch I'm Mayweather the best and proven to be I'll rap circles around you and deliver knockout punches that you can't see Look at your photo man, that's whats ridiculous You can't even fit in a room with any b!tches Now look who's fibbin, listen here loser The only time a girl talked to you is when you wanted to order a cheeseburger Girls who even look at you with a smile probably needs at least 10 beers You about to be a streak loser, just like the 76-77 buccaneers Con can't even afford a hoe I can afford his mama for a dollar though I'm just a cute bunny all the girls love me This rap game I shine brighter than a Christmas tree Your just a pigeon trash of the city I'm like a old man responding to a useless bird giving you bread out of pity So don't even talk man, your so fat you can't even see your D!ck When you stand up it disappears like a Houdini trick I'm sick when I spit Imma have con throwing a fit I'm sorry infamous I just can't feel you You don't think about your lyrics foo You throw words that has nothing to do with me Your lyrics made my ears and eyes want to bleed Last time I CHECKED I don't know a SALLY You so weak that you had to make something up to rhyme with "TALLY" Your pathetic dude stay home and watch your pornography I'll be out there with the girls you can't get in reality So get ready Like the Niners, Imma be a legend and rep hard for my city Listen closely man, I'm from cisco land of the gold You are just a nobody from Ohio
Rap Battle 4

pro claims to do rap but at a loss for words, i could smoke a chimney out when i drop my herbs. he's feeling confident since he won rap three, but takin' on me is like 1v1 vs. kobe, ya don't know me, but i can show ye, i'm like old english learning new tricks, i'm ridiculous - jump outta wall and make ya suck my clip, no matter what you throw at me, i dodge it like wrong disses, i could float in a forest yet be non-fictitious! i'm vicious, b!tches tend to say that i'm delicious, when i jump up on the mic and start to rip it. so just listen to the dissin' i'm givin', 'cuz any line you spit after this is all fibbin'. you could never be a star 'cuz rust just don't glisten. pro's tryna be straight but i still smell the crisco, kinda hard to be not gay in san fransisco! you a lone homo hobo, sittin in cali', while i stay straight homely, spittin' in rallies. and you ain't never hearda me 'cuz you take d!ck in allies, you'd never get a girl, so forget about stickin' sally, 'cuz last i CHECKED, she likes me, so strike a TALLY. i'm ruthless - forget your galleries of morality, i replace portraits with stills of hardcore p0rnography. you could be strokin' your ego but coppin' my discography. infam0us, set the record straight, every time i spit in pairs, i'm a pigeon, you're a bunny, so you could say i sh!t on hares. and by pigeon, i mean i'm fly, opposite of road kill, with my sh!t on you, only way you could hold skill.
should people adopt wild animals

I believe that, but domesticated animals kill people too. Here are a few examples. http://savannahnow.com... http://www.dogsbite.org... http://www.cnn.com... And that brings me too my second addition. The legislative issues. When you adopt an animal of any variety there needs to be some form of regulation. I usually agree with small government but when it comes to dangerous things you need to have some government involvement. I think we should put in place a stronger animal control force that regulates the adoption, care, and release/giving up of animals. If there is one thing I hate more than a socialist country its a scum bag who throws an animal out to starve, but I digress. If a country/state is willing to regulate these things I believe any animal is not off limits for adoption.