Resolved: Frozen 2 will likely be better than the original Frozen

"We all do not know if frozen 2 is going to be stupendous maybe its plot will become lame thus, the majority of the people will dislike the movie ."This is DISNEY we are talking about, not some 2-bit M Night Shyamalan movie. I literally mentioned four possible plots that Frozen 2 could revolve around, im sure Disney would be able to come up with a plot for Frozen 2 since there are so many directions that they could go with the Universe that Frozen takes place in. " hmmmm..... What if another movie was released example: The hunger games: mocking jay ?"I already argued that studio's would avoid releasing movies at the same time as Frozen 2 so that they dont lose money, and since Frozen has grossed more money than any other Hunger Games movie, or literally almost ANY other movie, its an extremely safe bet that no other studio would release a major movie at the same time Frozen 2 came out to avoid losing money. http://en.wikipedia.org..."What if in frozen 2 , olaf died and kristoff also died do you think people are still going to like the movie? What if in frozen 2 less singing and more crying do you think people will love it?"Were you dropped on your head as a baby by any chance? This is a DISNEY MOVIE we are talking about, not a George R.R. Martin production. Olaf and Kristoff wouldnt both be killed off since a sequel to Frozen would very likely be extremely similar in theme to the first Frozen movie, since the themes in the first Frozen movie is what allowed it to make more money than any Iron Man movie ever made. "There are still many more movies that are better than frozen"Your own 'source' can only come up with stupendously bad arguments like 'Rapunzel Is More Likable Than Anna Or Elsa', 'Tangled Is Progressive Without Being All IN-YOUR-FACE About It', and 'The Villains Are Better In Tangled'..... To claim that Tangled is somehow better than Frozen, even though it didnt even make HALF the money that Frozen did (despite having almost twice the cost), shows that your source is nothing more than a crappy opinion-piece Also, in case you forgot to read the title of the debate, the resolution is 'Resolved, Frozen 2 will likely be better than the original Frozen'.... So by providing a source saying that Frozen allegedly wasnt that good, you are only making my case better. To summarize this train-wreck of a debate:1 - The Sequel naturally makes more money than the original, as evidenced by Monsters, Despicable Me, Toy Story, Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Shrek, etc. Therefore, Frozen 2 will likely make more than Frozen 12 - More movie theaters will have been built by the time Frozen 2 comes out, making it even more likely it will gross as much, then more money, as the original did3 - Plot wise, there are so many different directions that could be what Frozen 2 is focused on that it will certainly be able to at leats be as good as the first Frozen4 - Now that Frozen has established itself as a box-office-blockbuster of a franchise, no studio in America would want to release major productions at the same time as Frozen 2 comes out, otherwise they would surely lose a crapload of money, which movie studio's usually dont want to do. The first Frozen had significant box-office competition against the Hunger Games, an already established franchise, and now that Frozen is a force to be reckoned with, and even more so than The Hunger Games itself, the odds of Frozen 2 having significant competition in movie theaters is extremely low. 5 - Half of Con's 'arguments' are simple 'what-if' scenarios that are likely to not happen since anyone who has any idea of what Disney Movies are even like, particularly musicals involving princesses, knows that their plots arent 'lame' or full of tragic events rather then happy ones. 6 - Con's las argument was that Frozen itself wasnt a good film, meaning that a sequel could easily be better than the original.