Relativity Is Wrong

Your dramatic paragraph only helps support my argument. It is because each of us humans have a unique field of fiew, and because such, everything is relative to the person who is doing whatever, in this case, observing the car.As for the paragraphs concerning time and length, how does relativity contrast this? The two ideas don't clash against each other. Time is based on which planet is observed to be self-rotating and how long it takes to go around the sun. How did you disprove relativity?? "Without movement, will there be time?" Well, based on our current observations and definitions, no, there will be no more time in a technical term. Nevertheless the clocks will still go on in different time zones, and we can still use this "time" to our advantage, except with no Day-Lights Savings or anything like that.In conclusion my opponent has failed to support why even one my experiments fail. He did use examples of other experiments that failed to prove relativity, but the core elements of my arguments stand upon my experiments, which my opponent did not rebut. Let me repeat them here for emphasis. Proof of relativity--from http://en.wikipedia.org......"Albert Einstein proposed three tests of general relativity, subsequently called the classical tests of general relativity, in 1916:[1]1. The perihelion precession of Mercury's orbit2. The deflection of light by the Sun 3. The gravitational redshift of light" And he also says "The chief attraction of the theory lies in its logical completeness. If a single one of the conclusions drawn from it proves wrong, it must be given up; to modify it without destroying the whole structure seems to be impossible". So, what Sir Einstein is saying, is that if even one of these three is disproved, then his theory is wrong.As cited by the same wikipedia page, the first point is proven in this chart: Sources of the precession of perihelion for Mercury Amount (arcsec/Julian century) Cause 531.63 ±0.69[1] Gravitational tugs of the other planets 0.0254 Oblateness of the Sun (quadrupole moment) 42.98 ±0.04[2] General relativity 574.64±0.69 Total 574.10±0.65[1] Observed Point two is proven by this part of the passage: "...The first observation of light deflection was .... performed in May 1919 by Arthur Eddington and his collaborators during a total solar eclipse,[3] so that the stars near the Sun could be observed. Observations were made simultaneously in the cities of Sobral, Ceará, Brazil and in São Tomé and Príncipe on the west coast of Africa."Point three is proven by "it was....conclusively tested when the Pound–Rebka experiment in 1959 measured the relative redshift of two sources situated at the top and bottom of Harvard University's Jefferson tower using an extremely sensitive phenomenon called the Mössbauer effect.[4][5] The result was in excellent agreement with general relativity".[1] http://adsabs.harvard.edu...[2] http://classroom.sdmesa.edu...;[3] Dyson, F. W.; Eddington, A. S., Davidson C. (1920). "A determination of the deflection of light by the Sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of 29 May 1919". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 220A: 291–333. [4] http://adsabs.harvard.edu...[5] http://adsabs.harvard.edu...;I repeat: my opponent has given irrelevant arguments that failed to rebut mine.Vote me.