The God of Abrahamic religions is not real. (Christianity, Judaism, Islam)

We aren't talking about good or bad being in the Bible, I do not know where you brought that up. The goodness of the Bible is irrelevant since moral values are not absolute. Your point about Hitler is therefore invalid. You continue to ask if the entire text of the Bible is equally flawed, based on 'major parts' of the text which were incorrect, but this is pure speculation, and therefore, irrelevant to this debate since we only deal with logic, reason, facts, and evidence here. You seem not to understand my thesis when I talk about Maxwell's theory. I was saying that just because a small part of a dissertation is wrong, doesn't mean that the whole is incorrect. The same is true for the Bible, irrespective of the Aether being a theory, and the Bible being a religious document. Again, you continue to argue against the Bible being an "infallible text", but your advances here are unnecessary since I already agree with you. Stop should stop trying to force me to believe something that we both inherently object to. You are taking that scripture way out of context and reducing your argument to absurdity. The scripture itself means that we need Christ for us to be forgiven of our sins, how does this translate into God not caring about us knowing him? Again, you take the scripture for the face-value, and allow your own bias to infect your view on it. This can be illustrated by looking at the text objectively, rather than critically, as you seem to do. If you are trying to argue that there is a contradiction between this scripture, and the Trinity, then I would agree with you. It makes more sense to say that the "trinity" is not one entity, but all three are distinct and separate individuals. Concerning your point about Hell, let me remind you that you previously said that torture and hellfire was definitely not the same as living in the slums. Since I proved that hell does not have to be torture and hellfire, that allows my analogy to hold. Your point here doesn't really refute much of anything, really all it does is say the opposite of what I just said. Hence, it is invalid. You are very incoherent in your next point (about beaming people up), I don't think we are on the same page here. Again, your following point is also incoherent, I do not understand your context. There are two parts to forgiveness. One is justice, the other is a remission of your sins. Christ took the Justice part onto himself, and now we need ask Christ for the other; if we meet his requirements, which are a broken heart, and a contrite spirit. As for your citations, I was asking for you to show biblical evidence for: "it was written by men who thought the earth was flat" "those people thought the heart controlled emotion" "the weather cycle was dependent on animal sacrifice" "God hates homosexuals" "Earth is only 7000 years old" As for your other citations which aren't covered here, I was not disputing them. Sorry, I probably should have been specific. As for the Earth's age, assuming you refer to Genesis 5, that only adds up to 1743 years to Noah, and there was a huge gap between Noah and Christ. Leviticus 20:13 does not say anywhere that God hates those who are homosexuals. Only that homosexuality is an abomination and therefore, those who attempt it should die. Again, even if you were correct in these statements, none of these arguments prove that God exists. Time and space are axioms which may or may not exist in reality. You make an assumption when you say that nothing can be beyond time, but what is stopping anything from being beyond time? Since time is only relative to a preferred reference frame, if there is no reference frame for a body to measure time, it could be said that the body is timeless. You again, do not understand how sin and repentance operate in relation to God's power, nor how his plan is set up. The LDS do not hold that the Bible is infallible. In fact, one of their articles of faith state that "We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly." As I said, any church is irrelevant to the existence of God. Even if you prove that none of these churches are logical in any form, that does nothing towards your main thesis in this argument. Saying that, if God knows everything you will do, then we have no free will, is akin to saying that scientists control the orbits of the planets because they can predict the orbits. This is nonsensical. Again, you do not know how God's plan operates. We came to Earth so that we may learn the difference between Good and Evil. For some people, starving, being raped, etc, is what it takes to learn this. But do not assume that God must therefore be the cause of this. That is incorrect, since He is not responsible for the actions of people... Look at my evidence for those against organized religion, in favor of their own personal theism. I do not see what is wrong with accepting this, since you can plainly see that people practice it. What makes God's existence more likely is not part of your thesis, and is therefore, irrelevant. Besides, even if it was, there is nothing that shows there is a chance towards one or the other. And probability is irrelevant to this discussion. Your thesis was that God, as Christians/Islam/Judaism know him, is not real. Probability is not within the realm of you argument, and it does nothing to support it. We are discussing possibility. As with most of your arguments here, they say nothing about the existence of God at all. It is irrelevant whether or not God is incorrect in his commandments, or the Church illogical, or anything relating to the doctrine of God, since these things do not prove your thesis. What matters is certain issues related to the philosophical and logical validity of the existence of God himself. This is outside the realm of any sort of error in the doctrine. Philosophically, God is well within reality, and there is nothing to dispute that; logically, or otherwise.