an explanation with no criteria of itself is synonomous with no explanation

All explanation are not the same, for a scientific explaination give us the ability to predict with greater probility the future thus increasing are ability to make educated decisions.. were something like an appeal to god promises result in the after life.. The problem is obvious in the fact that nobody has been in the after life and back. And importartant but hard thing to get out clearly is the difference between pop science and what is actually science. As and insider, I am aware that most people tend to think of only technology as science. but this are products of science. not science it self.. another problem is supposing science as this special catagory of knowledge.. . when the method is just an externalization of prediction and trial and error process that you use to simply walk at the door. in that you make a prediction. if I push this block of wood. it will move.. 2 I push the block or would 3 it moved.. so know I know..if the block didn;t move. I would have to change my prediction(theory) to something like the block of wood is nailed down. Then proceed to check it if is .. with the very same thinking process.. and eventually we will get it. and thus we get an explanation which gived us predicting power.. were a god like explanation is to just suppose the same thing, over and over again.. Further support is that when you look back in time you realize all civilizsion. explain what they don't know by some form of spirits. as knowledge about things increases the less and less gets attributed to spirits........ a good example is greek mythology .. where the explation for every cause is because of some god. .. the reaon for the sun.. is the sun god...... the reason for movement is water is a water god.. earth good. ect... but they are no more mythological then any spiritual explanation.. if is just the bias of modern religions we say those are myths.. another example is native america.. south and nortern. that is because of the isolation of variation of civiliztion.. there explanation were still compose of spirtist.. why the water move ... a water god.. we may not have explanations of why how the world began .. but just putting in a god filler doesn't bring us any closer to understanding .it.. in fact its hurtful.......... for by putting that as an explanation prevents of from trying to figure is old.. because we think we know... .. for example if science didn;t make demarkation from religion.. then we would have never figured out what we know now.. we would still be just saying good is the purpose for what we don't understand .. but this is an explanation which depend on ignorance..... that is to lack a criteria for explanation, that is it is no more an explantion then that which does not exist. . because because faith is a default criteria.. that is when you got nothing else you are forced to have faith......but its better to say that we don't know... this enable us to keep asking .. and if things are progressing the way they are.. then why give up.......for why would god give us the power of reason. that is, are onlly distinquishing power incomparison to animals.. and tell us not so use it at the same time. (if you thiest) ... thus my major conclusion is an explanation with not criteria of itself is not an explanation. don't mistake the word explanation for the concept..