Atheist, are under Gods wrath, no attempts should be made to convert them.

First of all, cut out all the nonsense. Stop calling be brother, and quit talking like you are some damn king. I'm not impressed or intimidated at all. I am here to debate and show you why your faith is flawed, not act like a Christian snob. Your whole point is that atheist are unredeemable. You say that pagans have a chance to make it to heaven though. Here is where you're wrong. I'm a Catholic (I also wanna know your religion), and the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that all people have enough sanctifying grace in their hearts to be saved. No one is incapable of being saved. Therefore we must work to help those who are atheists, even if you think it impossible. What's your evidence that atheists are impossible to convert? You infer pagans are redeemable, and say pagans are incomparable to atheists because atheists cannot be saved. So false, as we know there have been many conversions of atheists to Christianity. Here is a short list of some prominent ones. https://en.wikipedia.org... . You say I am in error, and therefore my argument is flawed, by I just used straightforward evidence to prove you wrong. And what do you bring to the table? Exactly what I hoped you wouldn't. You use scripture that is entirely irrelevant to the question of this debate: Atheists are under God's wrath and no attempts should be made to convert them. While I'm quoting scripture that actually RELATES to the topic, you are spamming bible verses. As an example, you quote Matthew 16:24, "Then Jesus told His disciples, "If anyone would come after Me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow Me." Okay, that's a nice verse. However, it has nothing to do with your point of converting atheists. Another example, Proverbs 22:19 "So that your trust may be in the LORD, I have taught you today, even you." Another good verse, but has no pertinence to the actual debate. Anyone can copy and paste the whole Bible (which is basically what you are doing). It takes true Biblical knowledge to quote the right verses, which you fail so badly at. The only good one I see you brought up was Matthew 10:38 "and anyone who does not take up his cross and follow Me is not worthy of Me." Good one, a point for you. To bad you hurt yourself with all the useless ones earlier. You have a list of quotes from atheist where they outright deny the existence of God. While many atheists are very stubborn, does not mean they are unable to be converted. Refer to my list of converted atheists from earlier for proof of that. This is what irks me the most, when you say this: So young and completely ignorant of the word. Harsh yes, but I think apropos for this occasion. That you are handicapped if not allowed to speak using YOUR OWN words, Thoughts, wrong beliefs, such a pity, yet, there IS still time! Apparently you think I'm ignorant of the word. That's fine if you believe that, however don't just say that, EXPLAIN WHY. You just quoted what I said, than said it is ignorant and moved on with many unrelated biblical verses. How is it ignorant? "YOU are not a disciple little one." There are two definitions of a disciple, a personal follower of Jesus during his life, especially one of the twelve Apostles (which is neither of us) and a follower or student of a teacher, leader, or philosopher. I am a follower and have studied Jesus, therefore I am classified as a disciple. Your feeble insult is easily refuted with an unbiblical definition. This calls to mind something: you don't have to know every passage of scripture to be faithful to God's teachings. After all, even the Devil quoted scripture when he tempted Jesus in the desert, and the Devil was not exactly a good person. You claim that I wield scripture like a child with his dad's guns. Again, explain how. How were my passages childish? You need to explain yourself, not just accuse with no back-up. I have explained why you fail at scripture quoting, because most of your verses are unrelated to the topic. If anything, you are the "little one" who needs to learn how to use scripture in a religious debate. By the way, you say I am not humble, and yet you contradict yourself by saying "that I may instruct you. That I may prepare you for the road ahead." You are putting yourself before God's help. But still, thanks for trying to convert me to your side, even if you are wrong. That's what we should do, convert those who are atheistic. I am not "clearly disarmed," and I will not "forget the debate." This IS a debate, not a scripture show-off. I will no use less me, because scripture alone explains nothing, as you have so unwisely demonstrated. Here you say "A Believer must stand outside the box of Human reasoning to grasp that which is of God "Why". Because we DO NOT THINK nor UNDERSTAND the totality of the mind of our Creator. When we do not put ourselves under the complete authority of God, instruction, guidance and service, we invariably wander into the realm of "I THINK". Where you are NOW!" Okay, that's nice, even though it's completely unrelated to the debate at hand. Again you go with another list of uneeded biblical passages. Please, enough already. Also, your faulty argument that my interpretation of the Bible is wrong is filled with contradictions. First, you interpreted the bible by saying that my Bible verses are ignorant. According to you, the Bible should not be interpreted, so my Bible verses should be absolutely perfect to you. The fact is that the Catholic Church teaches that the Bible is up to interpretation. You do not have to believe that God literally created the Earth in only 6 days and then rested. "God is outside of time, and 6 days could be 6 years" is a completely fine interpretation of the Bible, and not heresy. (However church doctrine and central dogma is uninterperable and undisputable. But we are talking about the Bible.) The only reason there are 33,820 denominations is because Martin Luther, the first to split decided to DELETE part of the Bible, no INTERPRET it. You need more facts, less Bible verses that are irrelevant. By the way you keep quoting verses, it seems you think the debate is whether I believe in Gods eternal word. Well, I'll answer that really quick. Yes. Now can we get back to the whole atheism-conversion debate? I have read Matthew 13:14. This is by far your strongest Bible verse yet, and I do have to admit I had to think about this. After close analyzation, though, I found the word "hardly" before hear and after they in verse 15. This goes to show that even though atheists are prone to reject God, humans can still influence them to conversion. Again, see my list of converts for evidence. God has the capability of healing the hearts of atheists directly, but he also can heal them through the acts of others. Much like the Sacrament of Conffession, God works in persona through the priest. What if the priest said, "Ah, forget ya'll rely on God alone."? We are called to help one another, it is what we do as Christians. I hope in your response you can directly address my points. In your Round 2, you barely even talked about what I said, and when you did, you simply said "You're wrong." No explanation, and then you jumped into Bible verses. I answered you directly throughout by putting quotes, then explaining. Please show me the same courtesy, not a bunch of Bible verses picked from a hat at random. I'll restate some of my points that I'd like you to address directly to make it easier: 1. Luke 15:7. Tell me why it is wrong, if you can. 2. Benefits of converting atheists/agnostics/atheists can be show, and for the fourth time, check out my listof converts, the link is above but here it is again.https://en.wikipedia.org... 3. You would not be Christian if it were not for conversion efforts. Only Jesus and his apostles would go to heaven if they believed what you believe. 4. Luke 10:37. Jesus, as we both fully agree without debate, is capable of converting an atheist. In scripture, he says "Go and do likewise." Reread my Round 2 as well, and make sure you answer my arguments this time, don't just spam irrelevant scripture like usual. A new I pose to you, please make sure to answer: 1.You argue that converting atheists is a waste of time. However, if you pray for one, and then you still fail at converting him/her, you still benefit from praying to God, correct? So is it really a complete waste of time? Reading your Round 2 debate, I couldn't help but think that a Pharisee was talking to me. You might think you are fighting for the righteous cause, but really you contradict the teachings of God in a very prideful, "I know the Bible" sort of way. Take that into account before you fill Round 3 up with the entire New Testament and call me ignorant. I have displayed that I'm not. We worship God "who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth." 1 Timothy 2:4. It could not be more clear.