Reincarnation is highly likely to be true

"If your great grandfather died with a broken thumb and you were born with a broken thumb and then when you begin to talk you say you are your grandfather when you!re not supposed to know him and act like him and have his memories then it cannot be a coincidence"Sure it can. Individually all of those things can happen randomly, and when they all happen together they are all STILL coincidences that simply become less and less likely to have happened but still is possible. "Children by themselves know all of those details so it cannot be a coincidence."Saying it isnt a coincidence over and over just because thats your opinion doesnt make it fact though you idiot.... When somewhat rare coincidences stack up that doesnt mean that they are no longer coincidences and are proof of reincarnation, it just means its extremely rare since the odds of all of those COINCIDENCES happening at the same time is rare, but still possible. "These kids are too young to know who Santa is. This is not an argument. Children do not think hey are their belief."I dont know if youre stupid or just completely missed what my argument was, but let me go ahead and spell it out for you again...Kids can convince themselves that what they believe is actually true by bending reality around them with little white lies... And if kids think they are the reincarnation of their grandparents, they can make up fake memories that are vague and common enough to have also happened to their grandparents and make it seem like they lived it..... Its much more likely that kids act like they are reincarnated simply for attention then that reincarnation actually exists. ""At the time of writing there are three claims in the ESP field which, in my opinion, deserve serious study: (1) that by thought alone humans can (barely) affect random number generators in computers; (2) that people under mild sensory deprivation can receive thoughts or images "projected" at them; and (3) that young children sometimes report the details of a previous life, which upon checking turn out to be accurate and which they could not have known about in any way other than reincarnation. I pick these claims not because I think they're likely to be valid (I don't), but as examples of contentions that might be true."See, he says it might be true."If you could actually comprehend the meaning of words from the wikipedia articles you keep copy-pasting, then you could see that 1) He literally also says he doesnt think that reincarnation is valid, and 2) He only thinks some of these aspects deserves serious study.===================================================================================Seeing as how Pro has decided to keep talking with his head up his a** let em go ahead and bring this debate back to the core facts. 1 - Coincidences exist, and it is rare for them to stack up to an absurd degree but it is certainly possible and can even be fabricated to trick a few idiots into thinking Reincarnation is real...... 2 - Coincidences, fraud, vivid imaginations, and self-delusions are all far more plausible options and possibilities for alleged cases of reincarnation then reincarnation itself. And to claim that all of these things have already been eliminated from every case of reincarnation is asinine and flat out retarded to do. 3 - The most famous cases of reincarnation happened at times when science was in its infancy and when belief in ridiculously idiotic ideas for how the world works was at an all time high. There simply isnt a case of 'Reincarnation' that has taken place in this day and age that defies every plausible scientific explanation.....