Global Nuclear War is good

BIOSPHERE COLLAPSE IS INEVITABLE - OUR SPECIES CONTINUES TO PILLAGE THE PLANET AND ONE WAY OR THE OTHER WE ARE GOING TO DESTROY IT - THE ONLY WAY THAT WE CAN ATTEMPT TO GET RID OF OUR CURRENT MINDSET IN RELATION TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND WAR IS TO HAVE A MINIMAL REGRET STRATEGY - TO HAVE A NUCLEAR WAR. THE ONLY WAY WE HAVE A CHANCE OF SURVIVING IS TO START AN ALL OUT NUCLEAR WAR! AN ALL OUT NUCLEAR WAR BECAUSE IT IS THE ONLY WAY WE CAN EVER SHIFT OUR CONSCIOUSNESS. THIS SHIFT IN CONSCIOUSNESS WILL "CREATE A WORLD BEYOND THE DICHOTOMY OF WAR" MEANING THAT THIS WILL INDEED BE THE WAR TO END ALL WARS. THIS WILL CRATE NOT ONLY WORLD WHERE WE RESPECT OUR SELVES AND OTHERS LIKE US BUT ALSO THE ENVIRONMENT AND OTHER SPECIES THAT WE LIVE WITH. I ONLY NEED TO WIN FOUR THINGS. 1. IN THE WORLD OF THE CON WE ARE ALL DEAD FROM THE IMPENDING BIOSPHERE COLLAPSE. 2. THE NUCLEAR WAR STOPS THE BIOSPHERE FROM COLLAPSING. 3. SOME FORM OF LIFE WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST ON EARTH. 4. THAT LIFE WILL HAVE A PEACEFUL MINDSET WHICH STOPS ERROR REPLICATION. Lets go to the biosphere collapse debate first They drop that the biosphere will collapse. This is damning as the con concedes that all life will die when the biosphere collapses. They also don"t do any work on the timeframe of the collapse so you should prefer mine We must act with quickness " past 2020 all actions are irrelevant and every day past 2015 is playing with fire. We are on the Brink! Meadows in 14 writes [Dennis, Dennis Meadows is a co-author of The Limits to Growth. In 1972, was on a team of 66 scientists doing research about the Earth "Peak Energy & Resources, Climate Change, and the Preservation of Knowledge" June 3, 2014 Accessed November 6, 2015] http://energyskeptic.com... Once the peaks occur (between 2015 and 2020) all bets are off: past that point, the predictive ability is not to be relied on because the assumptions on which it relies will no longer be valid. in 1972 we had reached about 85% of Earth"s carrying capacity and today we are about 125%, and every month we delay in getting back within limits erodes Earth"s further ability to tolerate us. We have fundamentally altered the nitrogen, carbon and potassium cycles of the planet. It may never go back to an ecosystem in which bipedal mammals with bicameral brains were possible. Or, not for millions of years". This means we are all dead by 2020 meaning the spark is the only thing that can have a chance to save us. Lets go to the solvency of the collapse. The Con says that the spark would be a catalyst to climate change but does not give any evidence so you should prefer mine evidence that says spark will solve for the collapse. Not only does the spark solve the collapse it also solves warming Even NASA agrees " a nuclear war solves warming best Rosenberg in 11 writes [Adam, reporter for digital trends "Nuclear war could reverse global warming, NASA Says" February 28 2011 Accessed November 10 2015]// http://www.digitaltrends.com... big thinkers at NASA have worked out that even a small-scale nuclear conflict could serve to reverse the effects of global warming even a small "regional" conflict could have a dramatic impact on rising temperatures around the globe. that the fires left in its wake would release five million metric tons of black carbon into Earth"s atmosphere. It would first settle in at the upper part of the troposphere, which means a longer period of global coolings. A more grand-scale nuclear engagement would have similar results, With a smaller regional conflict,the effects would still be regarded as leading to unprecedented climate change," research scientist Luke Oman said in a Friday press conference. Average global temperatures could drop as much as 2.25 degrees for two to three years after. But spark also solves the collapse Spark solves biosphere collapse takes out industrialization a key internal to collapse. Caldwell in 2014 writes (Joseph George. He holds a BS degree in Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and a PhD degree in Statistics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Can America Survive Published 2014)// The candidate minimal-regret population puts an immediate halt to large-scale Industrial activity. It restores the planet"s biosphere as close as possible to the way it was prior to the massive changes brought about by agriculture and industrialization. It raises the likelihood of mankind"s survival back to what it has been for hundreds of thousands of years. It saves the planet for future generations. It restores to all other species the freedom and ability to continue to exist. Next they don"t do any work on Survivability besides saying it would kill a lot of people plants and animals. GOOD!!!!! That"s the point it solves for overpopulation and inequality and resource depletion They say radiation but the con doesn"t say it causes extinction but I will pre-empt it The WHO and Harvard agree " nuclear radiation has no effect on children of survivors Dallas in 15 writes [Cham, Professor and director at the Institute for Disaster Management at University of Georgia "How to Survive a Nuclear War" August 16 2015 Accessed November 11 2015]// http://www.newsweek.com... long-term investigations have concluded there are no statistically significant increases in birth defects resulting in atomic bomb survivors.. A WHO study concluded that there were no differences in rates of mental retardation and emotional problems in Chernobyl radiation-exposed children compared to children in control groups. A Harvard review concluded that there was no substantive proof regarding radiation-induced effects on embryos or fetuses from the accident. So we survive the spark Next they don"t do any work on the mindset shift debate. All this says that we will have a peaceful mindset post spark A MINIMAL REGRET SOCIETY CREATES HARMONY & A MEANINGFUL EXISTENCE BETWEEN A HIGH & LOW-TECH CULTURES. THEIR MUTUAL DEPENDENCE WILL CHECK RAMPANT INDUSTRIALIZATION & RISKS OF EXISTINCTION CALDWELL in 2003 writes [Joseph George Caldwell, Handbook of Planetary Management, ] One of the fascinating aspects of the minimal-regret is the fact that it allows for and promotes both a high-technology society and low-technology societies on the planet. At In a minimal-regret-population world, both cultures exist in harmony. Both exist on the same planet in a symbiotic relationship preventing the rise of mass (global) industrialization and dramatically reduces the likelihood of human-species extinction from catastrophic incident Next they bring up morality concerns about the spark but Spark Solves Future Generations Impact Magnifier Caldwell in 2014 writes (Joseph George. He holds a BS degree in Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and a PhD degree in Statistics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Can America Survive Published 2014)//EM Although a minimal-regret nuclear war may kill almost six billion people, that must be balanced against the very real possibility that not having such a war may not only result in the deaths of six billion people, but also the extinction of mankind and the extinction of all other species on the planet.If the human race is made extinct by the greenhouse effect, millions of people will have been denied life for every year of the next four billion years that the solar system is expected to last. If the Earth can support ten million people indefinitely, that represents forty quadrillion person-years of life. Is that amount of human life inconsequential compared to the lives of the mere six billion that occupy the planet today? That means if we are to save 40 quadrillion people we must kill 6 billion. That a pretty easy decision.