The resurrection of Christ was fabricated, added in later stuff.

All you have been doing is attacking the little side details of the scripture in the bible instead of looking at the cold hard core facts and details that really matter in the discussion of Jesus' resurrection. Your grammar and wording doesn't make since a lot of the time and its frustrating when people like you don't take they time to set aside bias to see what really matters in this debate. Your core arguments to me have been buried by unneeded sentences instead of getting to the point. You have overlooked my arguments and just jumped over them as if they were hurdles, and moved on to your arguments while mine still stand. What you say about women is historically incorrect if you are talking about ancient Jewish society. It is clear that in that time women were treated as property of men in Jewish culture. The women had no rights, and their only role in society was childbearing, with no education. If you were to create a fake story, as I have already stated, you would not use women if you want the best success in your made up story for power that makes no since, to take off. It only makes since that the Gospels mentioned them because it was true. http://www.womenpriests.org... Stop saying its about the spiritual body, you made assumptions about Paul's writing and didn't even bother to talk about the scriptures I gave you. Any sane person would conclude a physical resurrection if they are coming at it with an open mind about the scriptures I gave in my earlier argument. The evidence you gave me doesn't even make much since and its like that with a lot of your evidence. You still have only been attacking the scriptures which is not a smart thing to due considering that there is much more controversy in it rather than attacking from a different point at the resurrection of Jesus. Stop attacking William Lane Craig without all of the evidence. I watch him all the time, and no were have I seen what you say about him. I am not coming from a bias stand point, I have read and seen what other people have said about him. He is a professional that is rated one of the best debaters in the world. He has been debating much longer than Richard Dawkins, and even Richard refused to debate with him. Atheist websites even say things like "Craig spanked hitches like a foolish child" when you go to them, here's one for you. http://commonsenseatheism.com... Craig comes at it the same way as always with 5 key arguments that get to the point. He doesn't stutter and get all emotionally crazy like Krauss at their debate. Were is your evidence for saying that the Jews wanted a peaceful messiah? You contradict yourself, because in your first argument you stated that "God was meant to be a super solder to defeat the Romans but instead tries to pacify them." Are you serious? You just shifted to what I'm saying without realizing that you said that God was meant to be a super solder, which I believe the Jews interpreted wrongly about the prophesies about Jesus. The Jews believed they were Gods people, they didn't want anything other than God to rule over them. They had many revolts, not to mention the possible zealots that were with them. https://en.wikipedia.org... YOUR JUMPING HURDLES! The Roman leader does care, as I stated in my last argument which you avoided. He does care if one man dies if its the difference between the Jews erupting in anger or them being peaceful! They demanded that Jesus was to be crucified, Jesus must of known that he was going to be crucified going into it with that kind of crowd. As for what you say about Mary is dumb and just flat out annoys me, as you have given no evidence to say what you said abut her, and its just stupid. If they know were he was buried then stealing the body was nearly impossible, if they don't know were he was buried then stealing the body was also nearly impossible, as I've already stated in my last written speech. From that time Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised up on the third day. Matthew 16:21 Jesus tells his disciples many times he will rise in 3 days, read... and who would believe that he rose 50 years after death because his bones were gone... Really? The women didn't recognize the men at the tomb when there were only a hand full of Christians, and they are described as angelic, and you would then have to admit that they tomb location was known, disproving any stealing of the body. The disciples and all the other appearances changed them dramatically despite all predispositions, research it and be amazed. Your hallucination argument is unreasonable, and you have the burden of proof to explain it with evidence and not just guessing what might of happened. Paul hated the church yet he changes just because of a hallucination? 8 & 9 Just research...