God do Exist

Stating the Argument: Point One: History Historical evidences of Jesus in lo of support from other fields like archaeology are existing today. The seen article shows Jesus' existence via archaeological facts "It's March, Easter approaches, and new books about Jesus have appeared. It is an interesting and diverse batch this time around. Bart Ehrman's "Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth" (Harper) very ably assembles the evidence, showing that claims that there never was a historical Jesus fly in the face of common sense and more than sufficient evidence. "The Jesus Discovery" (Simon & Schuster) by James Tabor and Simcha Jacobivici argues that a south Jerusalem tomb (called the "Patio Tomb" because it is accessed via the patio of a condo) belonged to a first-generation Christian family. Tabor and Jacobovici think they have found an inscription that alludes to Jesus resurrected and ascended to heaven. Archaeologists are not convinced; some are complaining that the authors have grossly misinterpreted the evidence. Ehrman's interpretation of the evidence is convincing; Tabor's and Jacobovici's is not." To read more on this topic, click: http://www.huffingtonpost.com... Historians like Tacitus and Josephus also supports Jesus' existence by recording some of His' life's story. Josephus on Jesus: http://bede.org.uk... Point Two: Deaths for Jesus Surely, you won't die for a joke or for a lie. Perhaps, you are sentenced to torture and to admit if something or someone is real or a reality, and now, you are to admit it or not. Usually, when you say, "Yes, it is true", you are to be tortured, usually, too, because the judge and the rest did not like it to be true. The people who sentenced Jesus' apostles and disciples to death DID NOT LIKE Jesus, and therefore, they want to hear from His' disciples that Jesus is just a joke, but then, people like Apostle Paul and Apostle Peter died for Jesus' sake. Why? Because they know He's real. Point Three: Resurrection "After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep." - 1 Cor. 15:6 This historical evidences assures His' resurrection. This is a stronger case that 500 men saw Him. This is a historical fact, not a myth, so, this has to be true. What's amazing is that, this is not hallucination as well. By logical fact, it is IMPOSSIBLE for 500 MEN (FIVE HUNDRED) to hallucinate AT THE SAME TIME. Point Four: Science does not refute God, but man I am for Science as well, both Science and Mathematics, but, it does not mean, there is no God. Let me take an example: The Big Bang Theory is widely used as a means to debunk God, though its real purpose is to explain the universe's creation. At another point of view, does Big Bang has to do something with God? None. Singularity won't debunk God. Who knows, when God is speaking, all the things the Big Bang explains are happening. Other theories like Evolution has nothing to do with God, as Evolution is still a theory. There are more possibilities rather than Evolution. Conclusion: God do exist via Historical facts and Biblical evidences, the same time, Science cannot be the means to debunk Him. No one will die for a joke or for a lie, how come many people like His' Apostles die for Him? Forget about the Crusades, I am referring to the persecution of the Christians during the Apostles' time.