Evolution isn't supported with scientific evidence (4)

My first matter that I am supposed to address is how evolution works. To begin, I will start at the undeniable existence and workings of the cell. The existence of cells I would hope you would not waste time to rebuttal that, as we have both observed and used cells as bases of research. Now then, cells contain a nucleus which contains the DNA for that particular cell. DNA (more specifically Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid) is the "genetic coding" for life as we know it. DNA will derive how a cell grows, what it produces, interactions with other cells, etc. We have yet to find any lifeform not made of cells (excluding the realm of viruses, which are scientifically argued between being seen as a lifeform and not as they cannot reproduce without assistance, however their structure still resembles aspects within cells, and furthermore evolve themselves and assist evolution of others). Evolution is centered around cell activity, particularly in the mutation of its DNA. When a cell splits, it's DNA is copied to accommodate both new daughter cells. During the copying of DNA, it is not uncommon for mutations to occur (deletion, addition, inversion, etc). This is a keystone part in evolution. The mutation of DNA. The above splitting (mitosis) would mostly account for single cell evolution and other more primitive lifeforms. In larger lifeforms such as ourselves and other plants and animals, mutations occur in meiosis, which is the creation of the gametes or sex cells. There are specific mutations that occur during the second round of splitting (gametes split twice) known as crossing over. This helps with variation, as well as the other mutations I had mentioned earlier (inversion, addition, and deletion). The other final key part of evolution is that of variation, isolation, and natural selection. Variation occurs in the mutations described above, and are often very simply differences within a species. However, some variations will lead the members of a species within the variation to behave differently (I'll return to this later). Isolation, is when a species is separated (generally speaking its a land change), and living conditions change. Otherwise, isolation can be when a variant of one species is separated from the rest of the species. Natural selection is in all basics "survival of the fittest". Does one variation help the species in its environment? If so, the better equipped, the better mutated, the better variation of the species thrives and lives on to continue with that mutation. Whether the weaker is preyed on, isn't chosen as mates, or some other cause, the lesser variation dissolves. In the case of isolation, the previous variation may likely still exist. This of course isn't without saying that not every new variation is advantageous, and may die off themselves. I could pull various sources to support the evidence above, but I felt these were sufficient: . http://biology.about.com... . http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu... . http://globalchange.umich.edu... . http://www.biology-online.org... My next task is to provide proofs of past occurrence. Evolution tends to imply a common ancestor, mostly because via variation as species split they would have an ancestor at some point in order to create chains from evolving species to species. For this section, I will point to cladistics, genetic similarity, embryology, the fossil record, and homologous structures. Cladistics can be considered by some to mostly be used for classification purposes, but it also can be grounds to imply common ancestry. Cladistics is a tree diagram based sorting that compares organisms with similar qualities or variations. By tracking back different variations and when they appear among different species, we can determine that certain species may have had a common ancestor based on similar traits. Genetic similarity is rather basic, and is made under the appointed fact of how all life on earth contains the same types of sequences in genes, also suggesting similar ancestors. As an example, Humans share the oh so classic 96% genes with chimpanzees, 90% with cats, 80% with cows, 70% with mice, and then there are closer DNA resemblances with primates. This is not to say quite that we evolved from them, but that we at some point had a common ancestor. Embryology is an entire field dedicated to the research of embryos, and then further relating to evolution by examining similar embryos. Through the studying of embryos and their development, we can determine embryos within the same species and chains develop in similar patterns, and also share similar characteristics, even during phases of specialization. Our fossil record is another staggering piece of evidence, that not only can be dated to go much farther back than 6,000 years ago, but it can also bring up different species, and we can see them develop and how they relate to one another by structure. The most infamous transition of evolution would be that from dinosaurs to birds. Homologous Structures also point to common ancestors, in which they are structures where different sections can be similarly identified as to having common ancestors. Such an ancestral structure has been found particularly in invertebrates. Through the developments of the above, we can identify chains of evolution with much evidence and reason. There are chains for birds(Archaeopteryx), chains for elephants (Phosphatherium), chains for dogs(Miacis)- have a ball and look up one of your favorite animals to see what prehistoric ancestor we have dug up for them. As we speak, you're most likely sitting on a product of evolution. The vestigial tail that all humans have (Its called your coccyx! ). Why might the creator with his design have, how would one say- messed up? Britannica here has a wonderful amount of pages and evidences that sum up many supporting evidences of evolution: . http://www.britannica.com... Other sites to use for information: . http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu... . http://www.carnegiemuseums.org... . http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org... . http://evolutionfaq.com... . http://itc.gsw.edu...