moon landing is a hoax

first of all i give my opponent a chance to be impartial in this debate. but my opponent chooses to be partial. he favours NASA over common sense because NASA sends more satellite,gave more information about space than a common man like me can do. so he chooses to believe every word NASA says.he has an unshakable faith on NASA that "NASA can never lie". for his information, i want to mention a well known fact that NASA is a govt. funded organization. it means that NASA is totally controlled by the U.S. govt. you know, in these days those who have money have control over everything.an act was passed in US congress called the National Aeronautics and Space Act. NASA was established by this act. so it is a purely statutory body controlled by the us govt. each year a portion of federal tax money goes to NASA. source:http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org...; it means NASA could do anything the US govt. wants. anything. even lying.lets see the arguments:1] Lack of Starswe could call the brightness day and darkness night. so moon has night and day like earth.from my opponent's argument it is clear that apollo landed on moon on a moon day. so stars might not be visible. but why then the sky is dark as night? besides how my opponent knows that moon has no day and night like earth? has he visited moon personally? or just blindly believing the informations given by a govt. funded agency?2] Lack of Landing Crateri don't believe in nasa because it has an experience of space excavation.we cannot go back to past to examine the validity of historical claims. so we have to rely on them until time travel is possible. but this is not the case with moon. we can understand some natural day to day phenomena. we don't need uncommon explanation for common daily phenomena. 3]Different Lightingall the items that reflected light are reflecting the sunlight. so sun is the only source of light. but aldrin standing in the shadow of spacecraft are not reflecting sunlight because in shadow there was no sunlight. so which light aldrin is reflecting? are astronuts opening a movie studio on moon?4] Clear Footprintsof course sir since you are blindly faithful to nasa.5]Flag Wavingthis is the most stupid answer i have ever heard. if your argument as well as nasa's explanation is true then there should be no such thing called wind.why don't you try to wave a flag in an airless place by inertia? more arguments...........1] in the time of space race (1958 to 1980), medical science at that time did not know what would happen to a human in the weightlessness of space. how then usa can send men to moon and successfully without harm to health return them to earth?2] if you carefully study the space race you will find the following fantastic thing:a] on 12th april 1961, russia send gagarin in vostok 1. 1 year later, on 20 February 1962, america sent john glenn to space. both of them orbit the earth. how come america discovered the technology within 1 year?b] On 20 April 1961, about one week after Gagarin's flight, American President John F. Kennedy sent a memo to Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, asking him to look into the state of America's space program, and into programs that could offer NASA the opportunity to catch up. Johnson responded about one week later, concluding that the United States needed to do much more to reach a position of leadership. Johnson recommended that a piloted moon landing was far enough in the future that it was likely that the United States could achieve it first.c] from 1962 to 1965 russia has experimented with vostok and voskhod which was successful. nobody knows what america did in this 4 years. but from 1965 to 1966, america achieved many firsts directly taking advantage of russia's vostoks and voskhods using their gemini spacecraft. d] then in 1967 and 1968 russia started their luner programme which was highly unsuccessful. after that america successfully land man on moon in 1969.from all these events it is clear that in space race russia leads and america follows. it is clear that america uses succesful russian technology to do their space excavation.most probably america stole those technology from russia. but how come america become successful in moon landing when russia failed to do it? don't you think something fishy here?all these poins lead to one conclusion: america never made it. america fake it.source:http://en.wikipedia.org...