Evil proves God does not exist (Part 2)

Moral Frameworks and Pedophile Island Pro says "I maintain, that if the pedophile derived more pleasure than the victims sadness, it would be a moral act. " In order for your first argument to work, your moral framework which says that at pedophile island, if the raping of children by the pedophiles results in more pleasure than the victims sadness it is a moral act. Once again I think this shows how absurd your moral framework is, and thus your first arguments against Gods existence based on this absurd moral frame work. Evil and objective morality Pro says "As I stated before, Con has already agreed that this debate assumes evils existence. I have brought this up in the previous round without a challenge. " If Pro thinks I am denying that evil exists, then Pro is mistaken allow me to clear this up. Pro misunderstands my argument in this area. What I was showing, is that when some one uses the argument that "evil" exists as a proof of Gods non existence, they are committing themselves to the existence of a objective moral standard. As I said objective evil can't exist, unless there is an objective moral standard. So Pro has two options, either deny that an objective moral standard exists, at which point there is no objective evil, thus the argument falls apart or commit themselves that an objective moral standard exists and argue that "God" has some how not met this objective moral standard because "evil" exists. Pro asks "Under any definition you give, please provide an example of something that would be moral or immoral" I have already agreed that evil exists. We can call the existence of evil "x". The argument that evil exists "x" is not dependent on what exactly is or isn't evil, just that evil exists. What I do want to emphasize is that the argument that evil exists as a proof against the existence of God, commits it self to there being an objective moral standard. With Pros moral frame work of hedonism refuted, and Pro can't reference "God" as the moral objective standard, then what exactly is the objective moral standard that Pro is referring too when making the charge that God has not lived up to this objective moral standard ? Countering Pros new argument Pro says "B7.2 "God would remove evil" In order to support B7.2 Pro based this on B7.1) God would want to remove evil &B6.2) God is capable of removing evil Maybe I should of being more clear before, I agree God would want to remove evil, except in the case where there is sufficient moral reason not too. Now if Pro claims that there is no moral sufficient reason for God to allow evil (Which he must in order for this argument to work) then on what basis does he make the claim that God can't have any moral sufficient reason for allowing evil ? Until it is proven God and/or a moral being can never have sufficient moral reason to allow evil, it must be conceded that God could have sufficient moral reason to allow evil. Summary/Closing statements Pros first argument made the charge against God, cause God has not acted in a way that resulted in the most happiness. But this argument was based on a moral value that put "happiness" as the highest value, and was shown to be absurd as it meant that in the case of pedophile Island as long as the happiness of the raping pedophiles was greater than the suffering produced by the raping, then this was a moral act ! !! With this moral framework refuted, and Pro unable to use "God" as an objective moral standard, Pro had no answer as to what they were using as their objective moral standard to charge that God had done something objectively wrong by allowing evil to exist. Pros second argument claimed that evil exists (Something I did not challenge) and God would have no moral sufficient reason to allow evil to exist. But no proof was given as to why God would have no moral sufficient reason to allow evil exist, in any circumstance. As such it is possible that God could have sufficient moral reason for allowing evil. The existence of evil has not be shown to be a proof against the existence of God.