BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Underground Rap Songs

The second verse of that song you posted is crazy! My favorite underground rap group, AtmosphereAtmosphere- Trying to Find a BalanceThey love the taste of bloodNow I don't know what that means, but I know that I mean itMaybe they're as evil as they seemOr maybe I only look out the window when it's scenic"Atmosphere finally made a good record. "Yeah right, that sh*t almost sounds convincingThe last time I felt as sick and contradictive as thisWas the last time we played a show in Cinnci'"Get real" they tell meIf only they knew how real this life really getsThey would stop acting like a silly b*tchThey would respect the c*ck whether or not they believed in itDoesn't take much and that's messed upBecause these people do a lot of simple sh*t to impress usWhile everyone was trying to out-do the last manI was just a ghost trying to catch some Mrs. Pac-ManHello ma'am, would you be interestedIn some sexual positions and emotional investmentsSee, I'm not insane, in fact I'm kind of rationalWhen I be askin', "Yo, where did all the passion go? "East coast, West coast, down South, MidwestNowadays everybody knows how to get freshSomebody give me a big yes (YES! )God Bless America, but she stole the B from "Bless" (Accept it)Now I'm too f*cked up to danceSo I'm gonna sit with my hand down the front of my pantsYou can't achieve your goals if you don't take that chanceSo go pry open that trunk and get those amps (You know! )In the days of Kings and Queens I was a jesterTreat me like a God, oh they treat me like a leperYou see me move back and forth between bothI'm trying to find a balanceI'm trying to build a balanceSo now I keep a close eye on my petsBecause they make most of they moves off of instinct and senseIt's eat, sleep, f*ck in self defenseSo straight you can set your clocks and place betsWait, let's prey on blind, deaf, dumb, deadHustle, maybe a couple will love what you saidEmcees drag their feet across a big naked landWith an empty bag of seed and a fake shake of handsYeah I got some last words, F*CK ALL OF Y'ALLStop writin' raps and go play volleyballGotta journey the world in a hurryCause my attorney didn't put enough girls on the juryGuilty of droppin' these bombs in the cityBut I'm innocent, love is the motive that's why you're killing 'emGuilty of settin' my fire in all fiftyBut I'm innocent, blame it on my equilibrium. http://www.youtube.com...
The NIV Is Not Accurate

"No one has any reason to go and reword a bible and leave part of it out." In the NIV, It's easy to prove they've something like this. Job 1:6 in the NIV says, "One day the angels came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came with them.". One of the footnote says that in the Hebrew in means "sons of God"[1] In the translations, some of the verses are removed, thus making the context have a different meaning. For example, Acts 8:36-38, in the King James Version, says, "And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him." The conversion would basically go like this: Eunuch: What is preventing me from being baptized? Philip: If you believe that Jesus is the Son of God with all your heart, you can get baptized. Eunuch: I believe with all my heart that Jesus is the Son of God. And Philip commanded the chariot to stop, and they both went down into the water, and he baptized him. The NIV, which removes verse 37, says, "As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, "Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?". And he gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him." In the NIV, it would go like this: Eunuch: What is preventing me from being baptized? And Philip gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him. Mark 11:25-26 in the King James says, "And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses. But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses." In the NIV, which removes verse 26, says, "And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive them, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins.". Matthew 17:20-21 in the KJV says, ", If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you. Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting." The NIV, which removes verse 21, says, ""He replied, "Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, "Move from here to there," and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.'"
The NIV Is Not Accurate

I gave you a source the Biblegateway.com (The second link) and wrote every single verse down, and it shows they were all removed. If you go to any other Bible website that has the NIV available, they'll all show that those verses are removed. I never said the NIV wasn't a rewording of the Bible: Just that it is inaccurate. I showed a contradiction in the NIV in my 3rd point of my opening statement, and I showed how the NIV equates Jesus and Lucifer by giving them the same title. Even if you could prove no verses were removed, you still have the contradictions and the Jesus/Lucifer thing...
The NIV Is Not Accurate

Put your first argument in Round 1. NIV: 1. Jesus is the Morning Star (Revelation 22:16). Lucifer is the Morning Star (Isaiah 14:12) 2. It removes 16 full verses.[1] 3. Jesus is the one and only Son of God (John 3:16). Adam is the son of God (Luke 3:38). [1] - http://kjv.landmarkbiblebaptist.net... & https://www.biblegateway.com...
The NIV Is Not Accurate

When it comes to Bible translation, accuracy means getting as close to the original text as is possible in natural, contemporary English. It means translating with precision and clarity. Which is exactly what the NIV Bible does. Every NIV translator affirms this confession of faith from the original CBT charter: "The Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written." Together, the NIV translators have hundreds of years" experience studying, teaching, and translating the ancient languages of the Bible. Their advanced knowledge of biblical languages and linguistics helps them to bring as much meaning as possible from the original into English. rst, no translation of the scriptures is without problems in some places. Translation is not an exact science. However, this does not mean no translation can be trusted. the NIV committee chose the path known as "dynamic equivalent (DE)." DE attempts to translate what the writer was thinking as opposed to what he accually wrote. Biblical.com
PS3 is better than xbox 360

"As you read this, keep in mind that this entire debate my opponent hasn't made a good argument as to why the ps3 is better." Are you kidding me? I have given you a larger quantity of great exclusive games in which the ps3 excels at. I have given you more powerful hardware which the ps3 has. I have stated that the ps3 is a better media center device. SO DON'T YOU TELL ME THAT I HAVEN'T MADE A GOOD ARGUMENT AS TO WHY PS3 IS BETTER!!! "There is nothing the PS3 excels at. There is nothing that makes a 360 owner say, "I wish I had that". The only thing worth buy a ps3 at all is for blu-ray. But no one cares about blu-ray. That's why Microsoft never put one in the 360." I have given you a significant amount of exclusive games. I have given you the free and great Playstation Network. I have given you blu-ray but according to you no one cares about blu-ray. A LOT OF PEOPLE CARE ABOUT BLURAY!!Because blu-ray has a way larger storage capacity than standard DVDs. Even when a DVD is double layered that is only 16 Gigs of storage capacity. 16 gigs is not enough for a lot of modern games and there are a lot of cases in which games have to be put on multiple DVD's. There are a lot of games that are more graphics intensive than what the DVD format can handle. Bluray can hold 50 gigs which is significantly more than the DVD's 16 gigs. 1) Exclusives- Each console has their exclusive games that often sell really well. But between the Xbox and the Playstation, the Edge would have to go to our friends at Sony. Sure Halo swept the first person shooter world for a while, but with MW3 and Battlefield 3 in the market now, Halo has lost its luster. But in the case of the Playstation, long time series like Ratchet and Clank (PS exclusive by the way)have no match on the Xbox. Even newer series like Uncharted and Little Big Planet have as of yet to see anything come even close in production quality and sheer imagination (mostly with LBP.) 2) Online Play- So we all like saving money, especially when it comes to things that shouldn't cost anything at all. The perfect example is online play.Xbox Live is a fantastic online experience for your Xbox, if you want to be handing over cash for something that costs the provider nothing. PSN is free and it does a great job of providing a great free online service. Why would you pay for something that has been free for years? 3) Bluray- We all know that Bluray players are often over $100 dollars, but if you have a true HD TV, you will know that Bluray is worth it. Stunning Picture quality and functionality make it the top dog of the portable media world. So it only makes sense that a gaming console with Bluray is not only a good value for bundle purposes, but can offer superior picture and sound.These are all reasons why the ps3 is much better than the 360. Thank you for reading and I am done with this round.
PS3 is better than xbox 360

As you read this, keep in mind that this entire debate my opponent hasn't made a good argument as to why the ps3 is better. In fact the last couple of rounds is just him saying how much he wished certain features that are on the 360 were on the ps3 as well. He brought up the specs but what good is all that power if nothing is done with it? There is nothing the PS3 excels at. There is nothing that makes a 360 owner say, "I wish I had that". The only thing worth buy a ps3 at all is for blu-ray. But no one cares about blu-ray. That's why Microsoft never put one in the 360. My opponent brings up price. While the ps3 does offer a paid service, playing games online is free, yet more and more people buy the 360. http://www.industrygamers.com... That link states the during the holiday season of 2011, Xbox 360 sells were 88% higher than ps3's. That's insane. More people would rather pay for online gaming with the 360 than use psn's free service. Lamborghini to a bicycle man.
PS3 is better than xbox 360

My opponent only argues the features that the two consoles share. Note that he does not have a single rebuttal for the 20+ exclusive features that come with the Xbox 360. He even mentions how he wished the ps3 had some of the features. "Because Sony owns Playstation and they also own a huge music label and are inthe movie industry too that means they can also offer more movies and music than the 360." True, they could. But they don't. " Why would you want to pay 60 dollars a year to do something that the ps3 and pc has been getting for free all this time." You missed a question mark. But the answer is, because its absolutely worth it. It is like asking me why would I buy a Lamborghini, when I have a perfectly good bicycle. "Plus the ps3 has way betterandwaymore exclusive games than the 360" Quality over quantity. Xbox 360 exclusives are consistently higher rated than the ps3 ones. No Xbox 360 exclusives have less than that a 90 rating on metacric(kinect games notwithstanding). Infamous 2 and Killzone 3 hold a 84 and 83 rating on metacritic respectively. "The 360 only has a 4gb hard drive for the base model which would be too small for storing music." 4gb of music is like 2,000 songs. Why would even want to put it on your Xbox? Especially considering you can wireless stream songs from your computer or laptop. I'm doing it from my phone as I type this. Another thing is that you can use any USB flash drive as an Xbox 360 memory unit, allowing you to store much more than the ps3's 320 gb limit.
PS3 is better than xbox 360

PS3 has better hardware than 360. the CPU is much more capable than that of the 360. Note the 360 specs are on the left and the PS3 specs are on the right. Xbox 360/PS3 3.2 GHz Xenon processor/3.2 GHz Cell processor 3 dual-threaded cores/7 single-threaded cores (plus 1 backup core) Maximum 77 GFlops/Maximum 230 GFlops "The two CPU chips run at the same GHz speed, but the PS3's seven individual cores beat out the Xbox's three dual-threaded cores. And in terms of performance measured in gigaflops, the PS3 tops out at nearly three times that of the Xbox." as IGN said in this article the link is here for proof http://goo.gl... The 360 GPU is very good but it shares the video memory with the system memory. The 360 has 512MB VRAM and the PS3 has 256MB dedicated VRAM. However the 360 wins the GPU because it's GPU has more bandwidth because it is able to take bandwidth. to quote IGN again: "In terms of bandwidth, the PS3 slightly edges out the Xbox. However, the Xbox has the advantage of 10 MB of eDRAM. When relying on the eDRAM, system bandwidth jumps up to 256 GBps." Now for the RAM: Xbox 360/PS3 512 MB GDDR3 RAM (shared with GPU)/ 256 MB XDR RAM 700 MHz speed/3.2 GHz speed 22.4 Gbps bandwidth/25.6 Gbps bandwidth To quote IGN again: "The verdict: Once again, the Xbox's total amount of RAM is slightly misleading, as the system RAM and video RAM are shared. The PS3's XDR RAM is also far more fast and efficient than the Xbox's GDDR3 RAM, running at a speed of 3.2 GHz compared to 700 MHz." The PS3 is clearly the winner in terms of RAM as you can tell. Now for the hard drive: Xbox 360/PS3 250 GB HDD or 4 GB SSD/160GB or 320 GB HDD 5400 rpm 5400 rpm User replaceable with proprietary HDD/User replaceable with standard HDD with the 360 you have to buy Xbox specific hard drives but with PS3 you can replace the hard drive with your average laptop drive. in terms of the hard drives that come with the systems the PS3 is the winner because it's lower end model has a 160GB HDD and the Xbox 360's lower end model is a very small 4GB hard drive. the PS3 wins the better hard drive. The disc drive: Xbox 360/PS3 the Xbox 360 has a 12x read speed on DVD/ the PS3 has an 8x read speed on DVD, and a 2x read speed on Blu-ray The Xbox 360 only has a 7GB disc space because it uses DVD as it's disc format. The PS3 uses blu-ray which gives it 25GB disc space. Because of this much higher disc space of Blu-Ray it can have much more hardware intensive games that the Xbox 360 sometimes has to have on multiple discs. networking: Xbox 360/PS3 100 MBps ethernet/1 GBps ethernet up to 802.11n/up to 802.11g The PS3's ethernet port is significantly faster at a capacity of 1 Gbps. Both consoles now include built-in wifi support However the 360 has 802.11n and the PS3 has 802.11g this isn't a huge difference but it is definitely noticeable. I am going to admit the 360 has better wireless capabilities but for the average internet connection the difference is subtle. The 360 wins the networking round by a slight edge. I have argued my point as best as i could and this is the end of this round i hope to debate you when i see your point as well.
PS3 is better than xbox 360

"I have given you a significant amount of exclusive games" Actually the Xbox 360 has more exclusives topping off at almost 130 while the ps3 has only has about 95 . http://en.m.wikipedia.org...(seventh_generation) "I have given you the free and great Playstation Network. " Free? Yes. Great? If its so great why does it need to be constantly updated? Updates that take hours? And apparently these updates have a tendency to brick your ps3. . http://www.google.com... Great? Tell that to the 2.2 million people who had their credit card stolen last April. . http://www.guardian.co.uk... I have given you blu-ray but according to you no one cares about blu-ray. A LOT OF PEOPLE CARE ABOUT BLURAY! !" Which fully explains why people buy the system that doesn't come with the blu-ray, more. My opponent has admitted to wishing features present on the 360 were available on the ps3. My opponent has no answer for the 20+ extra streaming features on the 360. Also I forgot to mention that the 360 can be used as a cable box and DVR. Saving you money on your cable bill. If for some reason you remain unconvinced, I bring you Kinect. Kinect is a peripheral for the 360 that allows for controller free gaming. Nothing on the ps3 comes close. Using a combination of motion and voice controls, it allows the user the interface with games in a way never seen before. Even the movie Minority Report, a sci-fi set in the future, they needed HI-tech gloves to do what kinect does. Kinect has a fully established library of family games, but I can hear the scoffs of core gamers. Kinect has something for us too. . http://www.youtube.com... That first video is from E3 2011. It features a third person shooter game called Ghost Recon: Future Soldier. The video shows off a feature of the game called Gunsmith, in which you are allowed to view and modify different weapon parts, from the scope to the gas chamber. With Kinect he is able to move the gun around in a 3D space, explode it to reveal the individual parts, and magnify any part he chooses. He can do this using his hands or his voice. Nothing else in the entire world can do this. When he's done and he has his customed weapon, he takes it to a gun range where is able to aim, shoot, strafe, and reload without the use of a controller. I could go into the thousands of custom mods for the Kinect, and the fact that Microsoft is officially backing the hackers when Sony won't even let you jailbreak your ps3.
Mushrooms are the top of the food chain

No, I meant treat. In this corrupt world at the end of our lives, We have truly realized that man is not good. Deep down this world is not nice. Death in fact becomes a treat. Mushrooms profit from this treat, They are much like Willy Wonka in that aspect. Willy Wonka was considered to be top of the food chain, Until he was uprooted by a mushroom. That's right a mushroom was responsible for the death of Willy Wonka. After said mushroom achieved this they went on to be crowned the king of the mushroom kingdom. After his daughter peach was stolen and saved by a human, He decided to keep the human race around as simple pets. We are only play-things for the true ultimate mushroom race. After we lose value ie: we get too old to enterain as we had before, We are simply killed and feasted upon. In the circle of life where are the decomposers placed? AT THE TOP!
Mushrooms are the top of the food chain

There is one thing that all men fear. One thing that no one controls, No one escapes. It is the endless marching of time and the perilous treat of certain death and suffering. However, Out of this fear. This chaos. One thing reigns supremem. One plant. That's right folks, A plant is the true leader. The true master of death. What is this plant you ask yourself. This plant is the almighty mushroom. The mushroom has capabilities far beyond that of a simple human. With the task of cleaning up our Earth they are farther ahead in recycling then humans are. They are the top of the top.
Bible canon didn't originate in the church

The DSS is the oldest collection of writings, therefore all of these books I mentioned were already established as canonical, not by the church of Christ. According to the source you gave, 66 books are universally accepted. the sites also fail to provide sources for their claims. it's safe to say that humans simply observed the books as being inspired and could distinguish between those which aren't,already recognizing the 66 books which are divinely inspired.
Bible canon didn't originate in the church

Canon comes from the Hebrew word, kaneh. Its a standard for measuring. It is a human invented concept to claim authority to determine which so-called Judaism & Christianity religious books deserves to be called God-inspired. The so-called Church Fathers often spoke of religious canonization. http://www.netplaces.com... Historians date 367 AD as the year that Athanasius compiled a list of 66 books he thought were divinely inspired. Amazing, he choose 66 books from the old & new testament as inspired and for 1600 years those same 66 books remained unchallenged until Martin Luther & John Calvin disagreed through civil protest. http://www.biblica.com... Since canon is a human created word for "standard" and used by humans to lay out a standard upon which books were God-inspire, the verses Truth Seeker uses don't directly imply, as he claimed, "which books are canonical". Canonical, that is, which books are the human standard in determining which books are divinely inspired. His argument can't hold up to the scholarly definition of canon.
Bible canon didn't originate in the church

Perhaps Pro is banking on you-all not to read the verses and just accept his word. But none of the verses imply:The Torah has been authenticated in other books (Actually what is mentioned is simply that the "Law was written" this does not prove the "referring book" was written by God or commissioned by God.https://www.biblegateway.com...Joshua saw Moses as inspired (Says nothing about Joshua SAW/precieved/said/declared/etc. Moses was inspired by God to write the book).https://www.biblegateway.com...Joshua's worked was seen inspired (No one claims Joshua was inspired.)https://www.biblegateway.com...Ruth authenticates Judges (No such claim is made in this verse.)https://www.biblegateway.com..."In the days when the judges ruled there was a famine in the land, and a man of Bethlehem in Judah went to sojourn in the country of Moab, he and his wife and his two sons."Samuel is inspired Samuel gives a speech, never claiming God inspired him to write any book of the Bible.)https://www.biblegateway.com..."The DDS manual of discipline declares the writings of Moses"A writing written (DDS) written after a writing (Law of Moses). Ok.SKWikia,com declares the writings of Stephen King. So is Stephen King divinely inspired too by God to write? According to Pro's line of reasoning, yes.http://stephenking.wikia.com...same phrase Jesus usedHouse divided against itself cannot stand.Same phrase Lincoln used http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org...So if Morgan Freeman says the same phrase that authenicated the Bible, right? How about Barbara Walters? maybe Phil Mickelson, right?Josephus has been proven to have made errors & fabrications.http://www.johnthebaptist.us...My strongest rebuttal is showing Pro has failed his burden of proof in estabishing "Bible canon already existed and wasn't decided by man" esp. through bible verses. I showed they don't establish a Godly inspiration and that man invented that concept to cling to something supposedly greater than them. Canon comes from the Hebrew word, kaneh. Its a standard for measuring. It is a human invented concept to claim authority to determine which so-called Judaism & Christianity religious books deserves to be called God-inspired. The so-called Church Fathers often spoke of religious canonization. http://www.netplaces.com......