I know what caused the Universe

Thanks ConLet' get this party startedIn order for me to explain the cause of the universe, all I have to do is demonstrate how Nothingness -- that which is absent of everything -- is a negative "void" that must be filled. Once I've done this, I can explain very easlity and comprhensively why the universe came into being. A1) Everything must have an opposite:It's a self-evident fact that anything that exists must have something else that shares opposing attributes. The more opposing attributes this thing shares the more diamterically opposed it is:HOT - Opposite - COLD: Coldness is the absence of heat so they arn't diametrically opposed but coldness contains the most opposing attributes than anything else and it is why we have a word for Hot and Cold. If heat didn't have a counter-temperature then all temperature would be called heat and we either would not have the word temperature or heat because they would the mean same thing. HEAT: Makes things move faster. Increases temperature. Adds energy. COLD: Slows things down. Decreases temperature. Subtracts energy. Other, more obvious opposites are: Woman/Man, Up/Down, Life/non-life, everything/nothing As you can see, everything that exists has something with opposing attributes which give that thing value to stand out as an individual thing. If there were no Man then the concept of Woman wouldn't mean anything seperate from Human. Woman would just be another combination of letters for the meaning of Human. And everything that makes the concept of Man Man must have a counter attribute which makes woman woman. No things has an absolute oppsite: But at the same time, there can't be anything with absolute opposite attributions or else it would circle around and cancel itself out simultaneaously cancelling out the thing it is being opposed to.Woman: If the conept of Woman were to be the exact opposite of Man in everyway then it wouldn't even share the same attribute of being a combination of letters or an existing concept, which is 2 attributes man posesses. Which means the concept of woman would become non-existent, thereby leaving no opposite for the concept if Man. The importance of explaining this is to demonstrate that the concept of everything must share an equal counter attribute with the concept of nothingness in order for everything to exist, whilst at the same time, sharing at least 1 attribute. Everything: The universe and all that is in it. The existence of Time, space, matter and energy. Multiplying. Nothing: All that is outside, before and after the universe. The non-existence of time, space, matter and energy. Subtracting Here I have proposed that one of the attributes that Nothingness shares which counters everything is it's nature to subtract from existence whilst the concept of everything is to multiply.The universe and all that is in it must have an opposite which gives the universe meaning and allows it to exist. The only possible candidate for that is nothingness. So far, I have given valid reason to consider that nothingness is subtracting (negative) and NOT neutral. Now I will demonstrate this in the following arguments. A2) LINGUISTICS:In order to evaluate what the nature of something is, we must observe that thing in action. Because we don't and most likely never will have access to nothingness we cannot evaluate it's effects directly but indirectly. This is the same way science evaluates the big bang theory. It doesn't attempt to observe the big bang actually happening. It uses indirect forms of analyzation to give presedence to it's viability as a theory. You may think the concept of human language is a laughable way of analyzing nothingness but we actually see it's effect, by it's very concept, whenever we use the word. Let's look at the phrase, "I'm doing nothing". To do nothing is to literally not exist because the very action of existing is doing something; it's existing. So the concept of nothingness has removed all that I am doing. No other concept coupled with something will completely subtract it's existence. Only nothingness does that. This is a evidence that the nature of nothingness is to subtractYou can apply this example to anything; "I'm placing nothing on this apple". Have a look at what the application of the concept of nothingness has done and you'll notice it has removed something from existence. It has removed the action of placing leaving the person making no action. To utilize the word placing is to imply a positive event because it implies a process about to come into existence; the process of placing something. Only by utilizing the concept of nothingness will it cancel out the process of placing and leave everything unchanged. A3) NEGATIVE, NEUTRAL, POSTIVE:Just like in my argument of opposites, I will pose that if we determine what exists as an absolute positive and neutral then we can use this to determine what must be a negative. Positive must have an opposite (negative) and neutral is the middle ground. We already know that all forms of existence are positive. They are an increase in something. Even anti-matter is a positive because it's an increase of 1 thing from no things. Anti-matter is still matter. So, we know that all things are positive. They may not have a positive effect on each other but they are positive in the grand scheme of things. Now I must demonstrate what is neutral. Neutrality means to be in existence without having an effect. A neutral country for example is one that exists but picks no sides in a conflict. Neutrality implies inactive existence. The best form of neutrality I will utilize is the quanitifiable number 0. 0 does not add or subtract but it exists as a place holder. It allows an escalation in numbers. Without five 0's we cannot get to 10,0000001 (zero was required to even start at one. IN this case, it is implied) 001001001000 As you can see, we do not have a fith 0 so we cannot continue to 10,000. The reasons I say this is because we can use simple maths to discover what is the equivalent of the quantifiable number of 0 in reality and they share the exact same attributes. I claim that empty space is the mathematical equivalent of 0. Empty Space: The absence of everything, other than itself. A neutral area Empty space shares the same attributes as 0 in that it is a place holder. It gives an area for things to come into existence. In order something to exist it must have an area to exist in. A singular point of empty space would allow 1 thing to come into existence. YOu would require another singluar point of empty space to escalete up to 2 things existing. In mathematics the set {} is suppose to represent nothing but this is a miscomprehension of nothingness. For there to be complete nothingness there cannot even be area or empty space. The gap between { & } is not nothing it is an area that allows us to put numbers {0} or letters in {a}. If we remove that gap and place nothingness in there that would subtract the area and not allows us to place anything. This is another example of nothingness subtracting. Let's go back to our linguistics example and utilize the concept empty space as opposed to nothingness: "I'm placing empty space on this apple" . Notice how I am able to walk forward and place my empty hand on the apple thereby placing empty space. no effect has occured in relation to adding anything to the apple but the neutralility of empty space allowed my action of placing to come into existence. Whereas with nothingness I could not do this. Nothingness subtracted my very intention of placing by preventing it from happening. the negativity of nothingness and the positivity of placing cancelled each other out leaving me with only a phrase "I'm placing nothing on this apple". Lack of characters forces me to summarize pre-maturely: If empty space is equal to 0 then if we go below/remove empty space (nothingness) we have -1. Because a negative quantity cannot exist on it's own (it must subtract) this obligates the universes existence.