Larztheloser Should be "Knighted" With the Official Title "Beast Slayer"

Ok, let’s go! My argument: Larztheloser should not be knighted with official title: Beast Slayer. P1. Knighthood Titles- Larztheloser would not receive the title: Beast Slayer. The act of somebody being knighted is called “knighting” or formally- a Knighthood. There is only one sovereign country that currently performs knighthoods- this is Great Britain. This doesn’t mean that people from other countries cannot receive these awards. Great Britain is the sovereign state in the Commonwealth- thus, the head of the Commonwealth is Queen Elizabeth 2nd. http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://thecommonwealth.org... http://thecommonwealth.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... There are two types of knighthood which Lars (Larztheloser) could receive: 1) Knight Bachelor - This award can be given to any citizen in the Commonwealth, but is usually awarded to British citizens. A British citizen who receives a knighthood will be dubbed (the sword thing) and would receive the title “sir”. For a citizen of any other commonwealth country, they would receive an “honorary Knighthood) meaning that that they will not be dubbed and won't receive any title. https://uk.answers.yahoo.com... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://en.wikipedia.org... http://www.royal.gov.uk... 2) New Zealand Order Of Merit -This award is only given to citizens of New Zealand. Someone who receives this type of knighthood is called a “Knight Companion”. A recipient is dubbed and receives the title “sir”; this is the only title that they will receive. http://www.dpmc.govt.nz... http://en.wikipedia.org... As you can see, it would make more sense for Lars to receive a New Zealand Order of Merit. But nevertheless, it is not possible to be awarded the title “Beast Slayer” with any Knighthood award. Therefore, Larztheloser should not be knighted with the title “Beast Slayer” because it would not be possible; "only sir." This point alone would ruin my opponent’s whole resolution. P2. The Title “Beast Slayer”- Larztheloser has not slain any Beasts. Ok, let’s just bring up the definition of “beast”: “An animal, especially a large or dangerous four-footed one.” ...Now, let’s have a look at the definition of “slay” -> “slaying” -> “slain”: “Kill (a person or animal) in a violent way.” I think that you have used the term “slain – slay “a bit oddly. https://www.google.co.uk... https://www.google.co.uk... You bring up the irrelevant and odd point that Larztheloser has defeated many skilled and known debaters and then you say that has “slain” these people. Here are some questions for my opponent to consider: 1) Has Larztheloser ever violently killed any of the debaters which you mentioned? (To slay is to violently kill). 2) Has Larztheloser ever violently killed any animal of any size to that of a beast (beast- large and dangerous animal)? Answer 1) - No, all of these members are still alive (hence user activity) and they have never been physically harmed by Larztheloser. Answer 2) –No. In fact, I asked him; he basically said no. As you can see, putting down an animal is not to slay them. Also, a tree an animal. http://www.treedictionary.com... Reason 2:As I have explained before, When being knighted (in this case for Lars, a NZ order of Merit) he would only receive the title "sir". This is the only title one could be awarded regardless of whether there is a special request.C1: - Larztheloser should not be "knighted" with the official title "beast slayer"1)"Beast Slayer" is not an official title given when a knighthood is awarded to anybody. Only the title of "sir"2) Larz has not violently killed any of the mentioned debaters (whom were referred to as "beasts" by my opponent). Therefore he has not actually slain any "beasts". Even if he had slain these debators, he still cannot be knighted with the title of "beast slayer" because this title is not an official one. Even if he had killed a real "beast" violently, the same situation still repeats.- He should not be knightedConclusion: My opponent has presented a flawed argument - with the assumption that "beast slayer" is an official knighthood title, he has used the word "slay" too figuratively; thus allowing me to negate all of his argument.I have been able to negate my opponents arguments; thus he has not fulfilled the BOP and now has no valid arguments. I have provided strong, solid and unrefutable arguments against the resolution.I have fulfilled my share of the BOP.*quote CJKallstarI urge the floor to side with me!Ready to concede?