Morality is Necessarily Absolute

"Not stealing from you benefits you but how does it benefit me? You could argue that you could then just as easily steal from me which is true but that still doesn't prove how it is mutually beneficial for either of us not to steal from the other. If you don't steal from me there would be nothing stopping me from stealing from you. " Barely makes sense. All that the quote is saying is that just cause you think it is wrong doesn't make it wrong. It is mutually beneficial because it helps negate aggravation between people. "So if Hitler were right in front of you killing someone else you would just let it be? " I find it funny how my opponent drops the name Hitler to illicit an emotional response from readers. Hitler never actually killed people, he ordered it done. Anyways it depends on how I want to respond. Most likely I will not intervene because it would endanger my life. I care more about my life than that someone. "Just because people have different views on something does not mean that they all must be true " It is true in their eyes. "There is no consensus reality when it comes to truth. If it can be proven there are absolutes in the rest of the world why not morality? " Due to the fact that morality is not definite, math is. If you can prove morality with math, check your figures. "If something is morally wrong it is morally wrong universally." So it is wrong to eat pork universally, due to Islamic people being forbidden from eating pork. My opponent claims murder is wrong where as in parts of Africa murder is glorified because it signals that the killer is a man/women of power who has defend their land. Thus defeating your claim. My opponent also claims rape is wrong and again I point to Africa where rebels are known to rape women on a day to day bases and nothing is done because that group find it acceptable. Also if all laws were to support morality in all respects we would be 1984. "The belief in nothing can be a belief in itself. Atheists believe there is no God. Their belief is that there is no God. " AGAIN I stress the world idea. You have not fully read my statement. My Nihilism views are ideas. My view on atheism is the same. Unless sufficient proof provide from reliable sources atheism is my correct idea. "Then you would say that there is a possibility absolutes could be true? " Did you read your own question? I called it true because it says absolutes are not absolutes. My opponent even stated it includes morality saying that it is not absolute. My opponent has actually refuted himself. "If it is all subjective it shouldn't matter what the voters think, I you could still win in your own view even if the voters say you lose. " Of course that is how the human mind works and also shows how morality is subjective to other people. Though for a winner to be decided in accordance with debate.org standards the votes chose due to their own reasoning. "That is true, but unless we have a firm basis for truth we can't even start to truly debate and we are merely debating opinions and emotions. " My opponent is correct we are merely debating opinions and emotions. As you may see above no sources are provided though this debate, no serious Point being made. I look forward to read what else my opponent has to question of me.