It is always up to theists to prove that god exists. No exceptions. None.

Um no. Wow did you miss the point entirely. That shows that you have not been doing this for very long and that you do not really know what you are talking about as you try to rummage through your head the difference of what is fact from fiction. “First of all, you use Appeal to Ignorance fallacy. 'there's no proof so it's not there.'” 100% false. And do not try to second guess from something in which you obviously know nothing about. Its “There’s no proof, so YOU need to prove it.” BIG HUGE MONUMENTAL DIFFERENCE. Now that’s what is the theme used by atheists and not your dredged up thoughtless “commonly used fallacy by atheists.” “Well no just because you didn't prove it yet doesn't mean it's not there.” Again that was never stated. Wow can’t you read and or interpret? I mean you completely fail at interpreting your bible just as all christians and those that read the bible do, so just as you do here? Until YOU prove god and there’s something tangible, he’s not there. YOU can’t just go on and make up stories because you have no answers so “therefore god”. Atheists do NOT do that. Again BIG HUGE MONUMENTAL DIFFERENCE. “Actually I believe who says there is no evidence that God exists is somehow blind.” Then go right ahead and prove that your god exists right now because that BOP is always upon you. No exceptions. NONE. Of course you didn't even come close to doing it. “Well do you know what people understand when they say God? God is briefly a higher deity, supreme being that has no instance who created the universe.” That has got to be one of the belly buster worst excuses of all time.Its right up there with someone actually believing that one of the 10 commandments is overeating and obesity. If you go into the rainforests of Brazil, the peoples there won’t know what red meat hook you are meandering about at all. Now which god are you speaking of? There are over 2,000 different religions in practice right now in the world with different gods worshiped. So no. people will NOT know nor understand what is meant by when YOU mention the word god as to what YOU want them to understand. In every single language YOUR god can be disproved. No exceptions. None. Its so much fun ripping you to shreds because it is so crystal clear that you have no idea what you are squawking about. And what laws would those be coming from your god who in which in no way can you or anyone possibly prove ever exist? Oh you mean the laws that slavery is idealistic, that gays should be stoned to death, that if you worship other gods you should be killed, that if you work on the sabbath you should be killed, that if you blaspheme you should be killed, that god’s many genocides are perfectly acceptable in which he murdered innocent children and babies, and the fact that he hates children, loves raped women… oh you mean those laws? Oh you mean you haven’t read your bible? It shows. Sure there may very well have been a designer, could very well be a designer, could be hundreds, thousands, millions, billions, quadrillions. But its NOT the one according to the bible until something tangible shows up on my back door and even then, there’s 0 reason why I or anything should ---ever--- believe in that thing because there’s far too much hate and evil within it. And absolutely not is a designer required. If it is/ was then you have no free will. But then again if you believe in YOUR god, in which you have no proof even exists, you have no free will anyway. Now as far as a designer or DNA, you know what I and scientists and atheists say? We say “I don’t know.” But you who believe in god can’t. Those are terrorist words unto you as you believe that you have the answers to every single little thing within you god and little blank black book. Oh but wait! No god, according to you, who ranks supreme, would be STUPID enough to ever communicate through text, the worst form of communication possible rather than providing actual evidence. “If god is all knowing and he knows the future of all events and he wrote a book that can only be interpreted as if it endorses slavery and if its heinous violence against your children against your neighbors… how could a god be that omnipotent and devise a book where we can’t distinguish between the law of Israel and god’s law? I mean their interwoven where we have metaphor and fact and nobody can distinguish the two. We don’t know what we’re supposed to take figuratively. We don’t know what we’re supposed to take literally. Was it actually a tree? I mean come on. How can anyone distinguish this. I mean come on. It doesn’t make any sense. It doesn’t matter how its translated. It doesn’t matter what version. If it was written by an omnipotent being there would be ONE VERSION. And there would be only ONE WAY to interpret it because it would be written well.” Aron Ra Actually it wouldn’t be written at all. What’s wrong with your god comin’ down and talking to people? ‘Hey you know some of that stuff that’s in the book? I’m here to correct it.” Matt Dillahunty “We have to rely on copies of copies of anonymous authors with no originals and the textural testimony to a miracle for example, there’s no amount of reports, anecdotal reports that is sufficient to justify in believing that actually happened as reported. And anything that would qualify as a god would clearly understand this and if it wanted to clearly convey this to people in a way that is believable would not be relying on ---TEXT--- to do so. And this to me is the nail in the coffin for christianity. The god that christians believe in is amazingly ---STUPID---!!! If it actually wants to achieve its goal by spreading its word to humanity by relying on text, by relying on languages that die off, by relying on anecdotal testimony, that’s not a pathway to truth. And anything that would qualify for a god would know this.which shows either god does not exist or doesn’t care enough about the people to understand the nature of evidence to actually present it. Now which of those two possibilities is accurate?” Matt Dillahunty “If jesus and Muhammad and abraham and moses had never been born, which in any case I tend to dabble, if all their stories were untrue were suddenly found and everyone had to admit it some people I know would show panic. Now what would we do? We’d have no morals suddenly. What could be more nonsensical than that? As the matter of fact the position that we occupy would---be---precisely---the---same as it is now if none of these texts had ever been written, as if none of these lacerations had ever been made. We would still have to reason together about how how to treat one another, about how to build a just city, and about how to have irony and a sense of humor.” Christopher Hitchens No you are not annoying me. Trust me kid, you are but an ink blot. I've been doing this for a very long time and have met up and talked with far worse than you. You are just flat out ignorant, uninformed and not caught up with reality at all from your fetal position. Your thus far debate is in fact quite dismal and abysmal even though you most assuredly think you are proud of yourself. But I 100% know that I made that come to a screeching halt. Why? Because I can think, rationalize, reason, use common sense, use logic whereas with god, religion and the bible, there’s not a single ounce of green pepper steak within it. With a very big stun gun and odor eaters...Strange isn’t it that you did not use, at all, faith and the bible as evidence for god, which in truth is the only evidence you and others who believe in god have. But both faith and the bible are not evidence to prove god at all because no god would ever use them instead of evidence.