I Will Not Contradict Myself

=======Answers to Contradictions=======: Contradiction 1: Ha! Obama has created less regulations than Bush (sarcasm hinted). First of all, Bush has done all of his eight years. Obama is only just beginning has fourth year. Second of all, the regulations passed by the presidents take several years to enforce and implement. So most of Bush's regulations would be taking effect now and Obama's regulations couldn't have even taken effect mostly. But most importantly, "Mr. Obama has approved 129 rules that cost more than $100 million, compared with 90 such rules under Mr. Bush."[1] Contradiction 2: "A more careful reading would be that though most experts think they did, we are no longer clear how.""We should have been warned by the CFC/ozone affair because the corruption of science in that was so bad that something like 80% of the measurements being made during that time were either faked, or incompetently done."[2] Not to mention, the ozone hole has gotten worse since the banning of CFCs. Look at the graphs in source [3]. It's worse isn't it? Contradiction 3: You have been coherent. Coherent is defined as "logically connected; consistent"[4]. I have understoody your questions so far. The definition says nothing about misspellings. I find you coherent. I understood that question even with the misspelling. Contradiction 4: Yes. Almost anything can become a weapon. But putting even a big tax on anything wouldn't stop it being used as a weapon, even by the poor. Something that is $1 and is taxed 50% is only now $1.50. Still very affordable. Not to mention, this isn't a contradiction. This is you trying to attack my viewpoints. No contradiction here. Contradiction 5: There is such a thing as the right to life. There is nothing about the right to wealth. Life is given. Wealth is earned. Contradiction 6: [5] to counter your argument. One, it is a lot better to lower taxes for the rich than it is for the poor. One, the poor do not create and expand businesses very often (both activites of which create jobs). Two, the poor don't pay any taxes. "Some 46 percent of "tax units" (not 47 percent) pay no income tax—some 76 million tax filers.""Of the 46 percent, nearly two thirds pay FICA, basically their Social Security taxes."[6] Contradiction 7: I do not approve of this decision by Bush. His healthcare and education decision were questionable at best. =======Answers to New Questions=======: 1) Do you support a separation of church and state? Yes. 2) Are you good at seeing things that aren't in main focus? Usually. 3) Do you support school vouchers? Yes. 4) Do you think tax cuts ultimately increase revenues for the government? No. But it dosen't matter. Reducing revenue for the Government is necessary. 5) Do you think that the environment should be protected? Thorugh individual people. The Government should have no control over environmental decisions. 6) Do you with tort reform? You are not coherent here. I agree with it though. 7) Do you support abortion in any cases? Specify please. When the woman's life is in danger and when the woman has been raped. 8) Do you think that the government should provide some stimulus in poor economic times? No. 9) Do you want to honor women soldiers? Yes. 10) What figure is noticeable in this video that doesn't really have a place in the video (besides Australian culture)? The video won't load. My internet is a load of crap. =======Sources=======: [1]:http://www.cbsnews.com... [2]:http://skeptics.stackexchange.com... [3]:http://www.theozonehole.com... [4]:http://dictionary.reference.com... [5]:http://www.nytimes.com... [6]:http://www.economicpolicyresearch.org... =======Comment=======: You are welcome to counter my arguments against your contradictions and are welcome to point out new ones.