BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Golden Goose Epsom

YesEESh GoDLEn gOosse gIve hiGhetsT performance iN tHE WHOLE wdie rWoRLD. PLEaSe bUy NOW FORo tHE mODEST pPRICEoF @0@)0202002020@0)W00)*)&E3740*&*&^9$$$$ vBuX. Also cOeMs wItH free INSTlaLLATIIn O fPlaCAS foR yOUR uNnnEeDED sidebar nEEDS. YeeSHsH bUy NOW 66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666866666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666660666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
Golden Goose Epsom

Places is the area of the sidebar I use the most. Places will display and allow quick access to any folder, Application, Or file you have on your Mac. Christopher McDougall's 2009 bestselling book "Born to Run" quickly became barefoot running's manifesto. Choosing the right reflexologist for your needs is important. The latest shoe storage craze: Mud Room Bins. These wide, Charming cubbies are angled to provide maximum storage and deter clutter. A hot compress of [url=http://www. Goldengoosedeluxebrandsale. Com/][b]Golden Goose Sale[/b][/url] Epsom salts is also effective in reducing these areas that cause discomfort. The use of orthotic inserts reduces the unsightly presence of corns on your feet, Buy [url=http://www. Goldengoosedeluxebrandsale. Com/][b]Golden Goose[/b][/url] evenly spreading the body weight. On the line is the biggest prize ever handed out on Chopped, $50, 000 in cash and a new car. This is a question I'm still trying to discover the answer to. They often include a firm area within the midsole to reinforce the arch, And may have a variety of added support features. A 2010 study found that many women runners reported increased pain when they switched to the shoe that should logically fit their foot type. Towers are part of this rack that tends to be narrow and tall. A unique feature of this gadget is TempoMusic, Which plays songs that match your current pace. Actually, It's not good policy to deny this benefit. As a small entrepreneur, If you deny it, Word will get out quickly on the street. When I was a teenager, My Sunday school teacher told the class about an experience he had with a waitress. She was rude to him.
BestGore.com should be used for educational purposes in all kindergarten classes.

Thank you for reading this debate. I hope you support watching bloody movies instead of bestgore.com. I mean come on, Lord of the Rings is way better. My opponent opens his round with an incredibly false statement. He says that trigonometry and torture videos are worlds apart. But torture is actually based on a lot of mathematical principles. You can't make the pain last if you're not being precise. Trigonometry is composed of mathematical principles as well. Thus, they are not "worlds apart." More like down the street from each other, which makes it relevant. We're talking about kindergarten? Well, that just backs up my point. We need to reinforce an artistic view of the world alongside the brutality at that age. They can learn more precise techniques when they're older. But what our culture lacks now is a sense of original creativity. If you don't get them before the age of seven, they're basically packed up and moved out of the house with their own ideas of how the world works. My opponent also claims that bestgore is more refined than sex ed. This, however, is an irrelevant argument. Sex ed was just an example. If we don't give kindergartner's something with a plot, they will be sleeping like nobody's business. My opponent's next rebuttal (about substituting horror films for bestgore) can be destroyed by my argument concerning the age we're starting. Definitely need movies at this age. Then the last rebuttal is just ridiculous (excuse my conduct). No subject will ever completely engage students, unless it's largely composed of movies. Instead of hearing the conversation, "Yeah, we have to watch another boring video of someone getting gutted," you'll hear conversations more like, "I can't wait to finish the movie in my next class! That class is the best class ever! Jonelle is a genius, and I'm so glad that she pushed for this sort of curriculum!" I even get a shout out in the conversation. Now I believe this concludes the debate. Thank you for reading this far. I would greatly appreciate it if you voted con. Have a good day!
BestGore.com should be used for educational purposes in all kindergarten classes.

I think we can both agree that trigonometry and real torture videos are worlds apart.You're comparing an entirely abstract concept with just about the most real presentation of actual gore you'll ever find. I'm not even sure we're talking about the same website, so here's a link: http://www.bestgore.com...; It could be taught with, but considering we're talking about kindergarten classes, I'd go with an unstructured approach.Each lesson would simply involve browsing through videos/pictures on the website, choosing the content to watch and discuss in the class and ascertaining what both students and teachers can learn from it. It doesn't have to be techniques exclusively, it could be a really cool torture method; it could be about establishing empathy towards toddlers run over by a vans; it could be about the suicidal psyche of a Japanese student; the possibilities are endless, and you're comparing it to trigonometry?Trust me, bestgore is far less refined in its explicitness than sex-ed. Regarding your other counterpoints, I don't think showing horror films in class is a bad idea. But it doesn't substitute bestgore for the reasons I've hitherto given. They cater to slightly different educational needs (although they are certainly similar.)Secondly, even if bestgore doesn't rivet all students, no subject in general will. You'll always get disengaged students for one reason or another. But a lot of it comes down to the ability of the teacher to present the material, which will inevitably fluctuate. With a compelling teacher who can interpret the content effectively for the students, I'd say my plan is foolproof.Don't pull out now, con. See you at the finish!
BestGore.com should be used for educational purposes in all kindergarten classes.

My opponent's rebuttal sort of reminds me of when my teacher said, "Trigonometry will be fun because it's like learning another language of math that will make you feel like a genius once you get it down."It was never fun.Actually, that class gave me thoughts of suicide. Like gun in the mouth as soon as we had to deal with sines, cosines, and tangents. Fortunately, I was able to just block out the class and make modern art on my calculator.My point is that my opponent hasn't proven anything with that rebuttal except that a teacher could write a syllabus for it, which isn't really saying much considering how garbage those things are half the time.The reason I stand for watching movies instead is because it generates interest and gives children an imaginative idea of how to kill people. It doesn't matter if they're necessarily realistic, the point is just to get a kid's blood lust up. That's not going to happen if he has to watch the boring lessons of bestgore.comLooking at the techniques won't cut it.They need that fire and passion inside of them. The drive to make the world a darker place.To provide a personal example, I never even payed attention in any of my classes unless we were watching a real movie with a real plot. I even spaced out for most of the porn we watched in Sex Ed.My opponent's plan is destined for failure.Good luck in the last round.
BestGore.com should be used for educational purposes in all kindergarten classes.

Simply watching horror movies would defeat the entire point of this motion. Horror films may be violent, but they're not realistic. With bestgore, the bloody turture methods depicted in their videos are completely duplicable due to their basis in reality and real world events. Speaking of which:To call bestgore "the cinematic equivalent of waiting for water to boil" is completely unfounded. The site brings light to issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Brazilian gang violence, Japanese suicide rates, sadomasochism and a rich array of others. All of this makes for some very compelling viewing as well as being informative and relevant to the real world:Real world relevance to educational material is a problem schools have faced for a long time now. This change can only benefit our society in producing engaged, informed and resilient people who can bring forth and multiply. In this multiplication, future generations will become evermore engaged, informed and resilient.Con, over to you and good luck for R2.
BestGore.com should be used for educational purposes in all kindergarten classes.

I strongly disagree. Something is obviously wrong with my opponent.Bestgore.com? Come on, give the kids something with a little plot. They're not going to learn if they have to watch the cinematic equivalent of waiting for water to boil.They need something better like something from the various horror movies out there (Unfriended is a good option) or just any action movies or shows that involve people getting their heads chopped off.So on those grounds, I totally disagree with my opponent.
Heterosexual men should support and appreciate GAYS

Alkey, thank you for debating with me, I appreciate it. Now, let`s begin second round.First, you have to realize, homosexuality is NOT a choice. Homosexual men don`t wake up one sunny day, and say: "hey, maybe I should become a gay?". Being gay is not a decision. It`s biological feature, which can not be changed by persuading. For example, let`s suppose, that biologically you prefer women. Am I able to persuade you , to prefer males instead of females? I hope, no.Second, you provided a wrong information. Homosexual men are able to have children. In some counries, children are allowed to be adopted by homosexual family. Not all counries are allow to do this, but still, there are counries, which allow. Do not generalize.Third, you suggest us to jail innocent people for 10 or 15 years, just because their biological feature, which can not be controlled?!! Even murders don`t seat for so long. Is homosexuality much worse crime than murder? Finally, jailing homosexual men is not a solution of the problem. It can make situation worse, because there are a lot of cases, whenheterosexual men become homosexual in prizon, and no cases when homosexual men becomes heterosexual after prizon. Evidance is hear: http://en.wikipedia.org...Fourth, you wrote, that I`am selfish. I don`t really think that my traits of character are relevant to this topic and should be disscused. Anyway, what makes do you think, that I`am selfish? I take care of interests of both homosexual and heterosexual. Does homosexual men want to stop been criticized and banned by society? Yes , absolutely, and I argue for supporting and appreciating them. Does heterosexual men want to have free women? Yes, absolutely, and I support them too. So, how I can be selfish? According to all my evidance, I`am philanthropist, actually.Next, finally you are right. I really do not think, that my children will be homosexual persons. I`ll have two beautiful daughters, not a few homosexual boys.To conclude, I`ll repeat we are NOT able to "help" them, to become a "normal" person.Modern medicine says, homosexuality is not a disease. Evidance is hear:http://familydoctor.org... It means, they do not need in our help, and being homosexual for them is normal.But we can support them, letting them to live how they want, not banning them or even killing them.
Heterosexual men should support and appreciate GAYS

I'm completely against of this. I think heterosexual men MUSTN'T support or even appreciate gays, even you find it good and beneficial for heterosexual men. In my point of view homosexual people are sick persons, and we should help them to be a normal heterosexual person by persuading them that homosexuality is not good because there is a simple reason that they wouldn't have kids or there is another way of solving this problem, I think it will be better if we will sentence them for 10 or 15 years in prison. Another thing I want to say that, you shouldn't be selfish, God forbid of course, but don't you think that in future your children could become a homosexual person. So, I think we support them but in another way, that to help them to become normal person.
Heterosexual men should support and appreciate GAYS

Gays should be supported and appreciatedI suppose, a lot of people, who have read this statement, are surprised or even shocked. Why heterosexual men should support gays? Maybe, because of gay rights and tolerance? No, it`s a wrong answer. I do not care, about gay rights and tolerance according to them. Heterosexual men should support them, because of one, very simple answer. Gay existing is a very big BENEFIT for normal, heterosexual men. Lots of homosexual men, means lots of free, not involve in a relationships women. Sounds logical, isn`t it? Just imagine, if only 1 billion of men were GAYS , what does it mean? It means, that there are 1 billion of free, not involved in a relationships women . I find it terrific. Do you?
If insurance is legally mandatory, then it should be covered by taxes.

okay, are you going to just keep asking questions or are you actually going to debate at some point? i have presented more than enough points to get you going. ============================== How many rental car companies do there due diligence? Can you provide me a number? ============================== every single one of them - that's why they photocopy your driver's license, ask to see your driver's insurance papers, and require a credit card. ============================== So, are you going to insurance premium for marine transport? Marine transport is just like automobile transport. If you have uninsured driver, they"re screw unless the driver is rich enough to cover the cost of their treatment. Are you going to cover the insurance premium by taxes? Only rich and upper middle class only boats? This is unfair to poor and middle class because they cannot get insure by the government because they can"t own a boat. ============================== why do you assume "poor and middle class" cannot own a boat? not all boats are yachts. ppl who are swimming, kayaking, canoeing, etc, won't cause much damage in a collision but the same principle applies: if they get hit by a motorized vehicle that's uninsured, they're SOL. ============================== A fixed amount is fixed rate for everything. You did not provide a fixed rate yet, rates by type of drivers and that"s discernment against driver. Why does residential and commercial drivers have to receive different amounts of money if they are both shared the road. Are you going to create a lane just for residential or commercial? ============================== insurance rates are not predicated on the square footage of road used - it's based on the statistical probability of being involved in an accident. Metro Transit with 1500 artic busses on the road 22 hours a day in all weather is way more likely by a factor of several than Joe Blo in his Honda Civic to be involved in an accident. therefore, the bus company should pay a higher premium. commercial drivers where the transit is central to the business (taxi, courier, public transit, etc) are statistically more likely to play fast and loose with the rules of the road because their profit margin depends on speed and deadlines - they should pay more than Joe Blo who can come into work a bit late if speeding means he runs the risk of landing in the ditch. people with luxury and high-speed cars are going to rack up higher dollar claims in the event of an accident than a common import or a domestic vehicle so they should pay more. since the insurance would be part of income tax, it stands to reason that income would have a large part to play - someone who is an unemployed pedestrian would pay less than someone who drives to their minimum-wage 9-5 in a domestic car while someone who owns a prosperous cab company in three towns would pay significantly more.
If insurance is legally mandatory, then it should be covered by taxes.

How many rental car companies do there due diligence? Can you provide me a number? So, are you going to insurance premium for marine transport? Marine transport is just like automobile transport. If you have uninsured driver, they"re screw unless the driver is rich enough to cover the cost of their treatment. Are you going to cover the insurance premium by taxes? Only rich and upper middle class only boats? This is unfair to poor and middle class because they cannot get insure by the government because they can"t own a boat. A fixed amount is fixed rate for everything. You did not provide a fixed rate yet, rates by type of drivers and that"s discernment against driver. Why does residential and commercial drivers have to receive different amounts of money if they are both shared the road. Are you going to create a lane just for residential or commercial?
If insurance is legally mandatory, then it should be covered by taxes.

There are three issues with your argument. 1)You are assuming that every driver is paying taxes. Rental car Companies offer insurance to foreigner so that they can get around the industrialized countries that they are visiting. The Rental Car Companies have to pay for insurance premiums on the car plus what the foreigner is paying in premiums usually much higher than the Rental Car Companies to be legal in that country. Plus, these foreigners are not paying into the system so therefore the taxes will not cover them. Also, are you going to pay the Insurance premiums twice (Rental Car Companies and the Foreigner) since taxes will now cover all insurance payment? The Insurance companies will just love that making huge profits off Double Dipping. 2)You are forgetting about substitute goods in economy such as Trains, Taxi-cabs, Buses, Bikes, and Walking. Are you going to cover insurance premiums for walking? 3)If we used a fixed amount, are you going to adjust the fixed amount for inflation or deflation?
If insurance is legally mandatory, then it should be covered by taxes.

in canada, as in many industrialized countries, it is illegal to drive an uninsured vehicle. the problem is that insurance companies have taken this as a license to print money. they base how much you'll pay on various criteria - your age, your gender, your marital status, whether or not you have children, your employment status, where you live, what kind of residence you have, history of mental illness or addiction, criminal record, and your credit report are just some of the factors that come into play. it happens all too often that someone gets their license only to discover it was a waste of time and money because they can't afford the insurance premiums (which can run as high as $10,000/yr for a newly-licensed teenager, depending which company is quoting). when you make a claim, your premiums go up again. if you have too many claims - even if none of them were your fault - you can be denied and even blacklisted. if the government says it's the law that all drivers must be covered by insurance, then not only should it be illegal for coverage to be denied, but also insurance premiums should be covered by taxes (since *everybody* is protected by insurance, it makes sense that everybody should pay in) and damages should be set at fixed amounts, similar to how it is now (we don't have things like million-dollar lawsuits for dubious whiplash or back injury).
Rayman Origins is better than all platformers (and games) besides Gateways.

I think that although Rayman Origins is great, it's not innovative enough to be the greatest platformer of all time. My first examples are two excellent games, Metroid, and Castlevania, both released in 1986 for the NES. These two platformers defined the metroidvania sub-genre. Later, Super Metroid, released in 1994 for the SNES, went on to popularize and refine this sub-genre. Also, these three games are amazing! Especially Super Metroid, which boasts large sprites, an amazingly detailed world, and awesome secrets, plus tons more. My next example is an indie hit called Fez. This game isn't just extremely fun, but also one of the most innovative platformers released in a long time. That innovation is due to an amazingly creative new mechanic, which allows you to flip the world 90 degrees, extremely great puzzles, and amazing pixel art. Oh, there's one more thing I should add (actually one of the more important things): the refreshing new idea that instead of monsters or enemies trying to attack you, or boss battles, it's an extremely tranquil place. With all the hellish hardcore platformers like Super Meat Boy (which is also great), you sometimes need to just sit back, explore and relax, while still enjoying it to death.
Rayman Origins is better than all platformers (and games) besides Gateways.

To start off, I would like to point out just how creative Rayman Origins is! It's bursting at the seams with creative level design, mechanics, characters, and yes, the ARTWORK! The animators and artists (and the creative director and creator of Rayman, Michel Ancel) didn't try to make the art photo-realistic, like SOME (OK, most) companies I know, indie devs set aside. Although technically, Ubi Soft IS an indie company, in my book, they seem a bit large for one. Point 2: the game play: the game play for this game is tremendously amazing! The platforming is rock solid, the controls are smooth as hell, and the mechanics fit snugly in with the rest of the levels. I would also like to point out the over-world. It completely fits the game, and is the perfect hub to get from one level/area to the next. It provides a great place where you can just pause and think about what level to go to next. Also, about the areas themselves, they are just great! Well named, well designed, well animated and all around swell! I will have to point out another great thing about this game: the music! Greatly performed and written, the music for this game is a ginormous piece in the atmosphere of this game, along with the art and whacky-ness! Now, I know this was a bit short, but I look forward to your rebuttals. Next round, I will try to mark all of your rebuttals and rebuttal THEM! I will also go a bit more in depth about my points listed here, and list some new ones for you to rebuttal!
Rayman Origins is better than all platformers (and games) besides Gateways.

Hello! I think that Rayman Origins is better than all platformers (and games) besides Gateways. I am looking forward to any response! Only thing is, it would be considerate of my opponent to start the debate in round two. Also, please be respectful as to make this debate more fun for both of us (you can joke around and make the debates funny though).