The Internet can help you survive a Tornado.

I would also like not to lose because of conduct points(Not that I plan to, but it never hurts to be sure. ). Pro first provides an extremely flawed argument pertaining to my claim that I am not a reliable source. He first assumes that because I am an unreliable source that I am incapable of representing correct information. This is incorrect. I hold many correct beliefs, like 2 + 2 = 4, and 9 x 5 = 42(in base thirteen, that is). His second error is assuming that if I am wrong(which I'm not), he is by default right. If I am wrong, then Sharknado is either not helpful, or there are other things that are helpful. Both of those possibilities present a chance that the internet is useful, however, that is only a chance, and does not constitute a victory for Pro. Rebuttals: 1a. By Pro's own logic, my lame old stupid dumb opinion is correct. Pro would accept that I am not a credible source due to a few lines of unintelligent text, and Knitted_Trumper has committed an identical crime, stating that the best thing to do in a tornado is 'cut your nose off'. The nose could be extremely useful in a tornado, or any high-wind situation, as a sort of rudder, Just turn your head to change the direction of flight, or flare your nostrils to slow down. Any brain that would suggest to dispose of such a valuable asset is clearly not intelligent, much like my lines of gibberish. Therefore, as Pro has stated that I am not a credible source, it is clear that neither is Knitted_Trumper's brain. 2a. Con says it himself: The termination of SwirlyWhirly0118999's account was not because of his death. However, he does concede to the fact that SwirlyWhirly018999 died before their account was terminated, and we can see his account was terminated shortly after a request for help in a tornado. It's incredibly likely that his death was caused by the giant spiraling vortex of debris rushing towards him. 3aa. You attempted to say that since one website could help in a tornado, any website could, thus disproving my point. The issue with that is that the link you posted actually has no relevance to tornadoes whatsoever. It's just the word 'NO'(and presumably, 'YES', on Christmas, but it still wouldn't do any good. ) and a bunch of spinning flags. 3ba. Con says that Qopel's answer was helpful, implying that being told they didn't understand somehow helped SwirlyWhirly0188999 survive a tornado. However, SwirlyWhirly still died, which shows that Qopel's answer clearly wasn't helpful. 4aa. In my defense, I remember auto-correcting that typo. It was originally 'speling', and seems to have been"corrected" to 'spellling'. 4ab. This argument is essentially the same case as the last one. The answer was not helpful, and stupidity of the inquirer does not affect the validity of the answer. 4ba. I'll concede this point. . . Due to the fact that it has absolutely no significance towards the resolution. Spelling corrections are helpful, but not for surviving tornadoes. 5a. It doesn't matter if they are a super-bird or pigeons, if they are within tweeting earshot of a person in a tornado, they will literally be torn to pieces by the wind. 6a. I'm not going to lie, I don't have a Myspace account. But, if you look at what you originally posted for Myspace, it clearly says 'No Replies' at the bottom. I don't need an account to know what that means. . . It means that everyone is watching Sharknado. 7aa. and 7ba. That is assuming the auction is allowed to reach it's conclusion. There have been more than a few sketchy auctions on Ebay (and Iceland, to name a few), and most are quickly ended by the Ebay moderators. Most people wouldn't take one seriously if they listed a tornado for sale. 7ab. and 7bb. If you search for a tornado on Ebay, you will get a multitude of items that appear before the actual thing. 40,144 results appeared for the word 'tornado'(as of 12/18/13), and none of them were actually tornadoes. 7ca. However, there would be some people who would be dissatisfied with the technical specs of the tornado. This is understandable, as you would have no good way to measure it from the inside, but incorrect item specifications would clearly result in dissatisfied customers. 8a. Clearly, everyone isn't always logged onto their email. How else would I have been able to access this? . https://accounts.google.com... I have refuted Pro's refutations, leaving him with no remaining examples to prove why the internet can be helpful, and to fulfill his BOP.