No One Has Ever Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to Do Look More Like

Much thanks to my opponent for the first intelligent debate I have participated in for a very long time.Implying we said anything intelligent.1. Nobody Clares...nor does anyone see what I did there.My opponent made the argument that you can't make everyone within a five-mile radius a unicorn as a result of using even. He still shows no understanding of the resolution. See round two, where it was stated by me that making everyone a unicorn is only an example of using even. Because, as my opponent stated, this is impossible, there is no way anyone could have gone far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.Bottom Line:Because of the definition of "using even", and how simply going that far is impossible, No one has ever gone far even as decided to use even, let alone then going wanting to do look more like.2. Probability Not"This time I was only acknowledging that people will always question the probability of anyone even going far even to use even would to do look more like would be questioned."Then there are no problems here."Thats bullsh*t that you got right out of 'Darwins theory of Even". It has been disproven dozens of times that one can access infinite multiverses in the first place by using even to go far as to even even when the even has gone so even to even as even as if. That argument is so old and outdated that (insert joke about the con's mothers old age)"Pay close attention to this one, jury. My opponent argues that you cannot access multiple multiverses by using even to go far as to even even when the even has gone so even to even as even as if.(Complicated words shortened for convenience)However, he does not provide any better evidence that reaching other multiverses is possible, and I unfortunatly cannot allow him to in the next rebuttal because I will get no chance to argue against any new evidence presented.Bottom Line:Because we have found no proof that other multiverses are reachable, the odds are accurate.Because the odds are accurate, going far even as deciding to use even go want to do look more like is so impossibly unlikely that there's no way it was done within our existence.Because of that, it is true that no one has ever gone far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.3. I Accidentally the Entire EconomyMy opponent argues that you should take the advice of the people who have used even over those who understand the economic effects one who could possibly have used even. However, from the evidence presented, no one has ever USED even before. Therefore, the only legitimate advice remaining is the survey taken by world leaders."What is or isnt considered 'well-developed' is subjective though" This is what's considered well developed. [http://www.trademap.org...] The majority of these nations voted "stroke" when given the survey. These world leaders are our best bet to what would happen if someone went far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like, and they have come to the educated decision that someone doing so would destroy the world economy beyond repair.Bottom Line:Someone going far even as deciding to use even go want to do look more like would cause the world economy to cease to exist. Because it still exists, we know for certain that No one has ever gone far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.4. Proof (or apparently penises) "Penis, Vagina, same things except white stuff comes out of one and into the other..."The difference between apenis and a vagina truly sets this contention up nicely. And there is quite a difference. If any reader would like to be fully educated on the differences, please click here [http://wiki.answers.com...] WARNING: NSFW. Even if you choose for some reason to believe that they are the same thing, if that is so, then both A&E and A and E represent d words, which proves that E neither exists nor doesn't exist, which proves that no one has ever gona far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. "SPONGEBOB IS STILL PAYING HIS RENT, IS NOT HOMELESS, AND THEREFORE CONCLUDES THAT ONE CAN BE FAR EVEN AS TO DECIDE TO USE EVEN GO WANT TO DO LOOK MORE LIKE." To spare all the readers of incoherent philosophical arguments, I'll just sum it up right now.The proof my opponent presented to negate the resolution, though innacurate, aims to prove that someone CAN go far even as decide to use even go want to do look more like. And it's true, someone can, but it has been established that while possible, is so inconceivably unlikely that whether possible or not, has not happened in our existence.And that was the point. Not to prove that no one can, but that no one ever has. Which is a resolution that remains true.---------------------------------------Too Long Didn't Read, Why The Voters Will Vote Pro.The Big Things My opponent accepted this debate without fully understanding the topic itself, causing him to argue it poorly (See contention 1).My opponent tried to argue against the odds of it ever happening my saying the math is wrong, but does not provide any specific method to use in its place (See contention 2).My opponent tried to argue that world leaders do not understand the economic consequences of using even, but could not disprove the evidence shown that it never happened (See contention 3).My opponent spent much time proving that someone can (insert resolution here), but never proved that anyone ever did. Rather, he spent time trying to convince the jury that penises and vaginas are the same thing (See contention 4).The Minor DetailsMy opponent frequently made multiple spelling and grammar errors.My opponent used no legitimate sources to back up his case.My opponent said bullsh*t.Overall, the evidence is overwhelming.No one has ever been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.