Single-sex schools

I will be arguing that Co-Ed schooling is equal to if not better than Uni-sex schooling. Clarification:Its been agreed by Pro and Con in the comments that we are arguing about whether or not It should be mandatory for schools to offer ONLY Uni-Sex Education up until Highschool. Rebbutals:Easy ReservedPro argued that schools offering only single sex education would cut down on the hastle for their Constructors, For example where in a Co-Ed with 800 students, You would need 2 locker rooms for both Sexes, however in a Uni-Sex school with 800 students you would need 1 locker room since there is only 1 Sex. Which would benefit constructors. However this is not the case, Pro stated in the comments that only students up to highschool should be in a Single-sex school. This would mean that the 800 Students would have to move to a larger Co-Ed School which would mean more construction for constructors. If for example you have a large Co-Ed school you do not need to switch ever. therefor minimizing the uneeded amount of construction. Prevention of insultsPro argued that with sex segregation we'd have no more gender opression, however gender oppression is not a big problem in schools nowadays, despite the fact that little boys think girls have cooties, and little girls think boys are gross( which they still do now D: ) Since pro has brought up insults, I will make a point about bullying. And studies have shown that Single-Sex schools have a bigger problem with bullying Royal Society. Org states the following: More boys in single-sex schools than boys in co-ed schools were likely to have been punched, kicked, threatened, pushed, shoved or touched in a way they did not like. Girls in single-sex schools were more likely than girls in co-ed schools to have experienced exclusion from friendship and been ignored. . http://www.royalsociety.org.nz...;http://www.tes.co.uk...Physical bullying is worst in female-only classrooms, with the problem getting worse as children get older, according to the study. More girls and boys taught in a single-sex environment reported abuse from other pupils compared to the 90 per cent of pupils who attend co-educational schools. Contentions:Freedom of ChoiceWe Should have the freedom of choice to decide whats best for our children, There should never be only 1 way to do things, this is a very narrow minded way of thinking and not democratic at all. The education system should not just cater to Boys and Girls being seperated for unnatural reasons. Segregating Genders is UnnaturalIn the real world, Females and Males work together, so why shouldn't it be the same for education? seperating Males from Females would give them an unreal perception of how things are in the real world and thus making them more socially withdrawn and less co-operative when they are put in a situation where they are needed to work with the opposite sex. Putting Boys and girls into school with eachother at an early age, helps them develop in a way that is natural and healthy for their enviroment. Addendum: -I have refuted both of Pro's arguments and cited 2 websites supporting my arguments, as well as a diagram. -I have added 2 new arguments for Pro to reciteThanks, I look forward to your future arguments! -Dennis