God doesn't exist

"So basically I believe that there is no god"Fair enough, but im not here to convince you to believe in him, im only here to show how he exists"science is superior to all, there is no almighty guy in the sky with a white beard that created us. I support EVOLUTION!!"................................................................................ It appears that the Pro is claiming that God doesnt exist because science explains everything. That leaves me with six arguments1) Science doesnt explain everything2) Science and religion can get along well3) Science doesnt necessarily rule out Religion4) On an individual level religion may provide more hope or understanding than science5) Science doesnt disprove that God exists6) Evidence for the existence of God...1) Science doesnt explain everything, there are some phenomena that science has even to this day yet to yield a satisfying answer. The Bermuda Triangle, how animals migrate thousands of miles without getting lost without using any kind of tools, why (not how) the Big Bang occurred, why humans have certain emotions triggered only by seemingly random things or events, the Naga fireballs (look it up), spontaneous human combustion, etc. Science does not explain everything, dont get me wrong it explains a hell of a lot, but it doesnt explain everything, and for the things it doesnt explain religion might. 2) Science and religion can get along rather well. Science and the Bible's explanation for things, not so much, but religion and science can co-exist. Religion can offer explanations for why something happened and science offers the explanations and mechanisms for why something happened. Take the Big Bang theory, people accept that it did happen but may accept religious reasons for why it actually happened. People believe that God created the heavens and the earth, and people could easily accept that the big bang was how it happened. Science answers questions of facts, Religion answers questions of morality, together the two can co-exist meaning that science cant necessarily rule out religion. 3) Science doesnt necessarily rule out religion. In early times religion was turned to to solve both fact based and morality based questions that people did not know the answers to. For hundreds of years the Bible, the Catholic Church, and Religious "common sense" routinely failed in explaining why certain events happen as science grew stronger and began to explain natural phenomena, but as I said before it only provided answers to logical questions involving facts but has yet to give better answers to moral or emotional questions. That being said, science doesnt rule out religion since it only answers specific questions of nature while leaving others unanswered. Many of these questions involve faith "Why did this happen to me?" "Why does this have to happen to me now?" "Why do teenage girls have such sh*tty role models?" are questions based more on emotions or conscious than actual science, meaning that science cannot offer a valid answer to people whereas religion can. What does this mean? It means science doesnt completely rule out the existence of God4) Individuals on a daily basis encounter many emotional questions or moral based questions. Some I named before, Im sure you can think of some yourself, and these morality based questions cannot be answered by science, but they can be answered, sometimes very well, by religious beliefs. These beliefs and faith in religion benefits people, gives them answers when science cannot, can help them get on in their lives. Faith and religion can be strong enough to imply that there is indeed a supernatural or faith-based source helping them with their seemingly normal lives. This force could be God, and science cannot deny that. 5) There are two arguments to almost every God debate, evidence that God exists (see next argument) and solid scientific evidence God doesnt exist (the Pro's job to bring up). Seeing as how the only argument the Pro has introduced suggesting that God does not exist is that science is stronger than faith, which I have showed isnt true in all cases. 6) Existence of God I probably should have made this argument #1.... whatever, evidence that God exists, - 1 - The complexity of the Earth and its uniqueness necessary to sustain human life is very remarkable and could point towards an all powerful being who not only created the planets, but maintains them - 2 - Why do things happen, such as the Big Bang or life, where we know how they happened but when answering why they happened an all powerful being with intentions may be plausible - 3 - The amount of order in the infinite Universe may also point towards an all powerful being controlling chaos and maintaining order over an infinite amount of space - 4 - The events that do happen in our life when we need them most while science has already ruled it out do happen in the form of miracles, and some of them are well documented and imply that super natural forces are at work - 5 - Near death experiences are almost unanimous in description (white light at the end of the tunnel, revelation of knowledge they should never have known about) could imply an afterlife, a product that religion has always been based on. - 6 - The cosmological argument - 7 - The teleological argument - 8 - The ontological argument - 9 - The transcendental argument - 10 - The documented interventions of God's actions in human history (Resurrection of Jesus)I will end here for now :)