The user "ark428" is a horrible troll

General Statements1. "I am not a mythical beast."Con states that my Wiki source defined troll as a mythical beast. While my source seemingly did, it is not my fault. If you look up "troll," you'll find the mythical beast and the Internet troll on Wikipedia. I tried to use the Internet troll definition as a source, but for some reason, as you can see in Round 1, it removes the (Internet) part of the URL from the source, so it would then lead you to the mythical troll. While I overlooked this error, I didn't expect DDO to change my source, and there was little I could've done about it. Regardless, it's pretty clear what the intentions of this debate are. As I stated in the First Round, the definition of "troll" is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages. [1]So it's clear what we're arguing about.2. XStrikeX is a troll.As stated before, regardless of whether or not I AM a troll, that's completely irrelevant to the topic. The topic is about the Opposition being a "horrible troll." Furthermore, just because I insulted you does not automatically make me a "troll," regardless of your abuse of semantics. I'm sure the readers would agree that a troll is not just someone who insults another person. It's on a much grander scale than that. Anyway, it's irrelevant. This point should be disregarded.Defending My Assertions1. Ark428 is trying to troll.a) 'MericaCon tries to refute me by claiming that he mistakenly set his debates to 1 round. Because he simply made a mistake, he claims to not be a troll.This is ridiculous. Let me point out that he has not made "a mistake" but multiple, if he truly is accidentally setting his debates to one round. In the 4/4 debates he has instigated, he has made them ALL one-round debates. This does not seem like a mere accident or mistake. I believe Con is trying to avoid the issue here with falsities. b) 'Merica Round 2"I was simply trying to argue a side that I don't personally agree with strictly for the purpose of debating. Your assumption that this is immediate trolling is ridiculously inflammatory."Con tries to bypass the issue by claiming that he was intentionally debating for a side he didn't personally agree with, and he passionately, honestly did it. Looking at his arguments, I'd have to disagree. Even the least intelligent of humans would recognize that arguments like ark428 used in 'Merica Round 2 are useless, trivial, and poor. And since Con claims to be a very intelligent being (his IQ is 155, for example!), he is definitely capable of making better arguments than "Cheeseburgers Mackin'." He has not taken his debates seriously; he must be trying to troll people.c) People are stupid"Again, Arch is a great friend of mine and was not put off by my mistake in this debate, selecting one round instead of two. I always wished to have a legitimate debate on that topic, and made a simple mistake. Mistakes do not = trolling."This is extremely suspicious. What are the chances of making that same mistake four times in a row? Furthermore, assuming that he set the same time for voting for each debate, "People are stupid" comes 15 hours after "'Merica Round 2." 15 hours is plenty of time to realize he's made a mistake, let alone realize he's losing to Topiarey and should recognize his error. I don't believe any of these claims. d) 'Merica with another personHe doesn't even refute this. Customer Support removed it, and for a reason. You offered no assertions, and you made another one-round debate... "mistakenly," I assume? It was a great case of trolling that I wish I could show the readers.e) Burden of Proof"If the burden of the proof was not met, then he simply fails to win the debate. If losing the debate makes you a troll, then that means that one person in every debate is a nasty, horrible Troll by my opponent's logic."The Burden of Proof is being and has been met. I don't understand the latter statement at all. It'd seem like my opponent has agreed he's a nasty, horrible Troll. Please explain this.Refuting His PointsA) " I am not a troll.""all of your evidence comes from legitimate arguments"My opponent has not made "legitimate arguments" in his debates. In one, he made silly arguments, and since he claims to be so intelligent, he must be capable of more. He's certainly trying in this debate. Your arguments in 'Merica Round 2 are clearly silly, illegitimate, and it's pretty clear you're trying to upset Topiarey. Even imabench knows it. "Conduct to con again for pro spamming stupid 1 round debates with no real resolution." - imabench [2]In the other three that haven't been banned (lol), you don't say anything at all. I'm not falling for your excuse that you accidentally clicked "one round." 5/5 times, including your removed debate? I don't buy it. "they are legitimate debates considering my opponent made an argument against my case"They are not legitimate because you offered no case. That's the simple answer. They were illegitimate, you had no arguments, and said nothing; therefore, they are not debate."My opponent has been rather vulgar and rude throughout this debate, insulting me time and time again."I've insulted you like twice, not "time and time again." Anyway, my behavior has been much more honorable than yours in other debates, probably even this once, seeing as you're trying to dodge most of the accusations with untrue claims."This writing is clearly the actions of a troll. Should we acknowledge arguments from a man like this who uses "inflammatory, extraneous, and off-topic" arguments?"Look, whether or not I am a troll, which I have proven I am not, that is irrelevant. The topic is not "XStrikeX is a horrible troll," but that you are. ConclusionMy opponents one assertion (which isn't even argument, just defense) has been refuted. I have defended and extend my assertions. I have offered more sources than my opponent, as well as more evidence. I have exposed my opponent's false claims and have shown why he is a horrible troll.I look forward to the response and final round. Sources:1. http://en.wikipedia.org...(Internet) <= It did it again! Please just put an underscore between the terms "Troll" and "(Internet)." Thank you.2. http://www.debate.org...;