Science cannot disprove God

Dear Pro and All . . . . After several rounds I would like to thank everyone for following this. I would like to also thank anyone that votes. I totally appreciate your time and effort to follow this. As such, I’m going to keep my rebuttal somewhat brief. Also compraing the closet monster to god, and vice versa is not to talk down to the audience or pro, but to illistrate the absolute sillyness of the claim pro takes. Science cannot disprove the closet monster. Black swan – How do you know that science cannot provide an answer? Just because you dont know of something, doesnt mean it doesnt exist, or someone else doesnt know the answer. Black Swan #2 – Pro is claiming that you can’t study non-evidence, there is no evidence of a closet monster by definition. If you think science can disprove the closet monster but you still believe pro’s claim. Special privilege – if you accept that closet monster (or any other non-evidence imaginary creature) can be dismissed but not your god, then your claiming special privilege. Ignorance or Gaps – You need to check every closet, even those not made yet, to prove there is no closet monster. That no matter what evidence, you can always claim further ignorance or gaps. Transition fossils – Daddy, there are gaps in the understanding of what the closet monster is, who knows what he can do or his ultimate powers, he’s the closet monster. Gay pixies named bob – Science shows that it wasn’t the closet monster, but something else, so science gave an answer other then god, and disproved god. Unknown vs Unknowable – Pro claims you don’t know, and you can never know that the closet monster doesn’t exist. Just like individuals claim lightening and evolution 400 years ago. Which again is unsupported, despite the numerous ways and sincerity of the claim. Straw man of Science – Pro has demonstrated a lack of understanding of science. (see following point) Logical – As i have pointed out, Logic is not of the material natural world, yet it can be tested by science. Logic can be tested by the scientific method despite its non-material existence. God has attributes that exist (as given by pro) and can be tested, aka science, to see if they are valid. This is part of the methodology of science, pro just rejects the results and claims and contradiction that would eliminate his closet monster. Atheistic arguments – Pro is a pre-suppositional and implies that my arguments are biased because of my lack of belief, and asks to put aside your views on god. My belief on god has nothing to do with this debate. There is no need to apologize and you’re absolutely right, there is no theist vs a-theist debate here. If you made an equally unsupported claim, I would use the same webpage that has a list of logical fallacy’s to point out the fault in that argument to. Bill nye - Your conflating the individual with the argument, which you have done in the argument and missed the point (or Im really too subtle for my own good). Your presuming your first claim is true and proceed. What I’m asking for is the necessity and evidence of your 1st claim. You can be logically coherent but your starting point still false. I’m going to paraphrase my son and Pro My Son and Pro claim that the Closet Monster/God can exist without evidence. You cannot use a methodology of understanding (science) to disprove this being or study it. Not only that you cannot question the closet monster/god, and you can’t falsify him. My son and pro refuse to accept that turning on the lights, knowing why children are afraid of the dark, and other acts (science) can disprove the Closet monster/ god because he’s just too smart at hiding his existence. Also the sincerity of my belief says it’s real. He exists without evidence and leaves no trace, despite we know his existence in my closet/life. And if you turn of the lights on / reason "He can exist without existing, and evidence, despite contrary claims. " Our definition states that closet monster / God is supernatural and therefore, by definition, he is ABOVE NATURE, because that means something that scape goats everything. He is omnipotent and therefore can exist without evidence to us. And you can never show me I’m wrong, ever no matter what you say. I’m sure that many of us were little we believed in the closet monster. My son believes in the closet monster. I do not leave the light on for my son for reasons sake (and he’ll never sleep).