I am epic

Contention 3 is dropped and many elements of my other contentions are dropped. Simly refuting one line out of each contention (and none out of C3) is not sufficient. "just because you do something that can be epic, doesn't make you epic"Did you misread my case? I know that people that do epic things are not necessarily epic. But people who are good at doing epic things are epic and that is what my case was based around. "Agreed, people who are good at doing Epic things should be considered epic. Since we are assuming that Debating is Epic, let's look at Bala Cafa's Debate record, it's pretty impressive!"Is this a concession? Firstly, he concedes that people who are good at doing epic things should be considered epic. Then he concedes that my record is pretty impressive. That is pretty much a concession to the debate. Stating that people who are good at debating are epic and then stating that my record is pretty impressive formulates the following argument in my favour:P1: Debating is epicP2: Good debaters are epicP3: Balacafa has an 'impressive' debate recordC1: Balacafa is epic at debating P1 is agreed upon by my opponent P2 is agreed upon by my opponent P3 is agreed upon by my opponent Since all this agreements add up to the conclusion that I am epic this can and is being viewed as a concession. "Total “Easy” Debates: 52………" Almost immediately you can notice that this statistic is faulty. My opponent's first claim is that I have won 51 debates and then he claims that 52 of them are easy wins. How does that make any sense? Here are a few examples of debates where there haven't been forfeitures and the topic is not a troll one: British Monarchy: http://www.debate.org...;Feminist Movement: http://www.debate.org...;Secret Societies: http://www.debate.org...Abortion: http://www.debate.org...Disability Rights: http://www.debate.org...Space Travel: http://www.debate.org...Abortion (again): http://www.debate.org... The list goes on but I'm forced to stop because of the character limit. I won all of these debates and my opponent did not forfeit on one of them. The topics were not troll ones and were all in regards to very serious and debatable issues. "The debate was forfieted, and wasn't finished, so the end result wasn't decided." My opponent clearly didn't read the rules of the debate. If he had read them he would have noticed that rule 1 of the debate stated that there were to be no forfeits and rule 10 of the debate stated that any rule violating equate to an automatic loss [1]. "Since nobody won, considering his experience and Elo, and community bias," Firstly, I have experience out side of this site too in case you didn't realize. Secondly, many users have beaten useres with a higher elo than them. It is not unexpected that whiteflame has a higher elo than me. He has been on the site for over a year when I've only been on it for 4 months [2]. Community bias just proves my point. Epicness is about debate skill. If whiteflame wins because of community bias then that doesn't prove that he's more epic at debating than me. It just means that he has more community support than me and that is probably because he's the chief voting moderator on the site and gets a lot of respect from the community for producing so many votes with such high quality [3]. "It seems to have glitched" Yes, but airmax is working on fixing it and when it is fixed the debate will continue and I will win (per the rules of the debate). "Pro has said that he works for the governement, and has provided no evidence that he does so, because the link he used is broken. "Apologies about that. I didn't realize that the link was broken. The source was just my source [2] of this round. " (The percentage in which he affects) is about 130/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 " And what does this have to do with anything. The definition of the word epic is not in regards to quantity, it is in regards to quantity. It is in regards to how good you are at doing things. Since my opponent has conceeded that debating is epic and good debaters are epic I do not see how this has anything to do with the resolution at hand.Sources[1] http://www.debate.org...[2] http://www.debate.org...[3] http://www.debate.org...