God would not put your sin on Jesus.

Alright.. Thanks to my opponent for his well thought out objections. I will however, show that his contentions are actually a bunch of verse's taken out of context and represents a plethora of misinterpretations.. Lets begin,He begins by saying that Atonement using blood is not necessary.. Ok that doesn't really help the issue that atonement is REQUIRED in order to be right before God: "it is the blood that makes atonement for one's life." The author is not talking about what atones for the sin of drinking animal blood.. But for all sins! I agree that blood is a use for atonement because it represents life. Although it is not necessary.. It does not mean that atonement is not required My opponent the quotes Leviticus 5:11-13 where it states: "But if he is not able to bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons, then he who sinned shall bring for his offering one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour as a sin offering." This is an example of God's mercy to the poor and unfortunate who could not provide a blood atonement for themselves.. We see that a blood sacrifice is THE IDEAL ATONEMENT but for these who could not afford these animals.. God allow them to cover up there sins through a different type of atonement So we see how a blood atonement is the IDEAL ATONEMENT for God to cover up sin's.. My opponent has done nothing but to only show God's mercy to those who could not afford the ideal. He then claims that the "second goat" was not slain but rather.. released into the wild after atoning for the iniquities of the people.. Notice the sins of the people still NEED an atonement. This in fact.. Is a representation of Jesus both atoning for and bearing our iniquities Here's a commentary that explains this:"16:15-34 Here are typified the two great gospel privileges, of the remission of sin, and access to God, both of which we owe to our Lord Jesus. See the expiation of guilt. Christ is both the Maker and the Matter of the atonement; for he is the Priest, the High Priest, that makes reconciliation for the sins of the people. And as Christ is the High Priest, so he is the Sacrifice with which atonement is made; for he is all in all in our reconciliation to God. Thus he was figured by the two goats. The slain goat was a type of Christ dying for our sins; the scape-goat a type of Christ rising again for our justification. The atonement is said to be completed by putting the sins of Israel upon the head of the goat, which was sent away into a wilderness, a land not inhabited; and the sending away of the goat represented the free and full remission of their sins. He shall bear upon him all their iniquities. Thus Christ, the Lamb of God, takes away the sin of the world, by taking it upon himself, Job 1:29. The entrance into heaven, which Christ made for us, was typified by the high priest's entrance into the most holy place. See Heb 9:7. The high priest was to come out again; but our Lord Jesus ever lives, making intercession, and always appears in the presence of God for us. Here are typified the two great gospel duties of faith and repentance. By faith we put our hands upon the head of the offering; relying on Christ as the Lord our Righteousness, pleading his satisfaction, as that which alone is able to atone for our sins, and procure us a pardon. By repentance we afflict our souls; not only fasting for a time from the delights of the body, but inwardly sorrowing for sin, and living a life of self-denial, assuring ourselves, that if we confess our sins, God is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. By the atonement we obtain rest for our souls, and all the glorious liberties of the children of God. Sinner, get the blood of Christ effectually applied to thy soul, or else thou canst never look God in the face with any comfort or acceptance. Take this blood of Christ, apply it by faith, and see how it atones with God."This second goat narrative is not an issue to one who puts their faith in Christ.. It is actually a foreshadowing of what was to come.My opponent then claims: Whatever man of the house of Israel, or of the strangers who dwell among you, who offers a burnt offering or sacrifice, 9 and does not bring it to the door of the tabernacle of meeting, to offer it to the Lord, that man shall be cut off from among his people."This questions is actually addresses in Hebrews 13:11: "We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat. For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy place by the high priest as an offering for sin, are burned outside the camp.Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people through His own blood, suffered outside the gate.… "Again, not an issue to a Christian. This also renders my opponents statement" This contradict the requirements of G-d for Sacrifices, so Jesus "sacrifice" was in no way useful for remission of sin." as false because it does not contradict the requirements at all. Due to a lack of space and time, I will respond to my opponent's contentions in my next rebuttal