Resolved: Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory.

First of all, I will state that I agree that certain scientific theorem's are quite correct in regards to Terra's 4.6 Gya (Giga 'billion' years ago) history... I will, however, disagree with one of the affirmatives definitions: "Intelligent Design- Is the assertion that the universe and its features are explained by design by an omnipotent power (such as a god)." - This definition is incorrect, as many religious people will put forth the dissertation that an omnipotent power did not create everything that exists; (the universe we live in) rather, they found Terra as a void sphere, & created life on that 'void sphere.' I will now change the definition, so it reads as thus: Intelligent Design- Is the assertion that the EARTH and its features are explained by design by an omnipotent power (such as a god). (I would also like to advise my opponent that if you intend to 'borrow' a definition from the pages of Wikipedia, would you be so kind as to cite that it was intentionally borrowed from Wikipedia, in regards to the context of this very debate). Now, I do not intend to try to bamboozle everyone reading this to think I know everything in regards to scientific theorems & so called 'intelligent design,' but I will begin my argument with thus: If evolution is the main scientific theory my opponent will care to bring up and argue with, some religious branches of intelligent design actually comply & agree with the contexts of evolution. Ladies & Gentlemen, may I draw your attention to a sub-theory of intelligent design, that is titled 'Theistic Evolution.' Theistic Evolution - The belief that an omnipotent power, (a god or supernatural being) created life on Earth; but that scientific evolution is also correct, arguing that evolution is only aiding creation on Earth. My opponent, when he created this debate, probably had in mind that his opponent would argue using another of the sub-theories of intelligent design known as 'Special Creation.' Special Creation - The belief that all people were created, as they are today, by an omnipotent power; that the Earth is relatively young; (6000 years old approx.) that all fossils that have been used for scientific research were created by hydrologic sorting & liquefaction; and that evolution never took place within Terra's supposed '6000 year' history. In relation to this debate, I will argue that Theistic Evolution is a scientific theory. Theistic Evolution is just 'believing in an omnipotent power with evolution,' which is a proved scientific theory in today's society. Therefore, Theistic Evolution should be classed as a scientific theorem. Evolution prides itself on fossil recordings, & the proof (through the use of DNA, mitochondria, facial, skeletal, muscular, & psychosocial characteristics). We all started somewhere though, didn't we? Tracing back through all of our Earth's history, we find the first bacterium living approximately 3.5 Gya... Where did that bacteria come from? Thin air? Supposed asteroid & comet impact theories? Or was it created by an omnipotent power? The latter idea seems most logical; but other than that, Theistic Evolution agrees with the concept of evolution. The timeline of our origin, that we exist through natural selection & mutation, etc... Just because Theistic Evolution disagrees with evolution, by saying that a deity created the bacteria & everything else along with it, then we evolved by Darwinians theory; instead of saying that we were created out of thin air, we should completely disregard it as a scientific theorem? Ladies & gentlemen, that idea is ludicrous...