Racial profiling is justified

"Would you argue that a Chinese person would eat the same food as a Japanese person because they are both Asian? Would you say a Dutchman would have the same religion as a Spanish man because they are both white? Would you argue that an Iranian would act the same as an Iraqi (no, by the way, even though they are both of the same race, they hate each other and are very different!) That's called bigotry." By eating the same food I didn't mean it literally first of all. If two communities are hating each other doesn't mean they do not have the same ideology.The hate might be a result of any political phenomenon too. "That is because here in America, we only focus on terrorism from the Middle East." Just because America focusses on a particular terrorist group doesn't mean it is the largest, I agree, but when you check the statistical data more than 90% middle easterners constitute the entire terror community and carry out the most number of terrorist attacks at home as well as abroad. "Terrorism is not a trait of Middle Easterners. It is a trait of terrorists." By simply saying that you cannot deny the facts.We have to be PRACTICAL and find the epicentre of these activities if we really mean to eradicate them. " They are trying to find ways to prevent such events from ever occurring again. They would never say "Oh yeah, he bombed you and we take the blame because we are all the same skin colour." There is nothing wrong with investigating why issues like that happen in your country, one should do this, but to allow an entire population to be represented by someone in the minority is unfair to all the other good people just living their lives." When I said, people take responsibility for such incidents I did not mean to say that they all must be accused of it.You are twisting my words.I meant to say that we vehemently oppose such activities do not go by the literal meaning of 'responsibility'. "Take the US for example. Literally, our Constitution says "all men are equal" and we have many laws to prevent discrimination. We value human rights and peace and yet, we have the KKK. Or take Myanmar. Their leader is Nobel Peace Prize winner and yet the military is terrorizing the Rohingya Muslims. A society that values human rights can still produce terrorists because people can be evil regardless of their society. These terrorists are just a small number in all societies, though." Now how the hell did the constitution of the US come in?The ideology of a society does not depend on what is written in the constitution. Many things are written in our religious books. Do we follow them all?Just because it is written in the constitution of a country that Human rights must be valued doesn't mean it is really valued by the masses.It depends on the culture, the environment, and the thinking. The people don't really care if their leader is a Nobel laureate or not. I bet that even if all the Nobel laureates go to a terrorist country and preach humanity, they won't succeed. Why? because the thinking of the entire community is like that. Of course, exceptions will be there but the basics are the same.It won't change.These people have a false feeling of supremacy and that they are correct and the rest are wrong.No one is born terrorist, he is made one.