Atheism is Stupidity and Based on Imaginings having no Basis in Facts.

Atheist beware- You are on notice, the intelligent of the world have tolerated you long enough. Braggarts, dimwitted in the extreme, proud to be called Atheist. Not anymore! We shall investigate the evidence together, before the very eyes of all atheist present now or future. Today shall empirical evidence of atheistic stupidity be made manifest. Today, let atheist be not so proud to "BE" atheist as it shall forever be synonymous with "fools"(Con) Since my opponent didn't offer a definition of atheism, I shall do so now.Sigh …. Like a Deer in the headlights! So sad, SIGH! Do you really need MORE evidence than provided by Con already?Behold …. The definition was IN the title … obviously I failed to take into consideration that an atheist would be responding. my mistake. Allow me to rectify this ….. ATHEISM IS STUPIDITY!At this point it has become less opinion and more FACT, that Atheism is in point of fact. Not ignorance but stupidity:I submit for the BENEFIT of atheist-Definitions as provided by Merriam-WebsterDefinition of stupid:A: Slow of mind: obtuse- “like not catching that Atheism is stupidity IS the title!”B: Given to unintelligent decisions or acts: Acting in an unintelligent or careless manner. – “Like pointing out lack of definitions, that most could just READ in the title!”C: Lacking intelligence or reason: brutish- “Ditto”D: Dulled in feeling or sensation: torpid “Numb?” I suppose.E: Marked by or resulting from unreasoned thinking or acting: senseless "All the above!"F: Lacking interest or point “Ditto”G: Vexatious or exasperating. “ Uhh …. You think?”Definition of ignorance:: The state of being ignorant: Lack of knowledge, education, or awareness –Reading con’s history proves education not a problem?Definition of Imbecile:: Fool, idiot - I left #2 out as not appropriate. referred to mental retardation which atheist are not.I submit that atheist, cannot claim lack of knowledge; as knowledge is readily at their disposal. They are … at least the majority, not only educated but well educated. They certainly are sentient, aware of their mortality, surroundings and beliefs. Thus ignorance is clearly off the table, leaving only one of two possible conclusions, neither of which I’ll wager, brings that glow of pride!Atheism is, in the broadest sense, the absence of belief in the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is the rejection of belief that any deities exist.Arguments for atheism range from the philosophical to social and historical approaches. Rationales for not believing in deities include arguments that there is a lack of empirical evidence, the problem of evil; the argument from inconsistent revelations, the rejection of concepts that cannot be falsified, and the argument from nonbelief. Although some atheists have adopted secular philosophies (eg. secular humanism), there is no one ideology or set of behaviors to which all atheists adhere. Many atheists hold that atheism is a more parsimonious worldview than theism and therefore that the burden of proof lies not on the atheist to disprove the existence of God but on the theist to provide a rationale for theism.We shall take these one at a time, and let the FACTS, fall where they may. Ready?1: Lack of empirical evidence: FACT-atheist refuse to look FOR evidence themselves in all cases, demanding instead that it be done for them (Under the False belief of #6 and #7). However, once provided they revert to problem #4 on this list.FACT: Atheism is less than 1% of the Global belief (based on Census 2010)https://en.wikipedia.org...Evidence proving Pro’s allegations thoughtfully provided by Con:Con: My opponent claims atheism is stupid and has no basis in facts. However I contend that the most logical position to have on a specific topic when there is a lack of evidence is to have a lack of belief.Note* 99.98% of the Global population is in or searching to connect WITH God right now …. But, evidence of possible existence of God? Nope, not to the atheist!Con: I have never seen any evidence presented in my lifetime of a God, so it is most logical to have a lack of belief in all Gods.Note* two theories here? Born last night, or has lived under a rock since birth. The link above has BEEN there since 2010, so unless Con is 6 years old …. No excuse. Con: Unless Pro can offer up some evidence of a God, it is stupid to have a lack of belief in a God.Note* Demands I do the work for him? …. Are we learning yet? Con: All the arguments in round 1 from my opponent don’t seem to make any logical sense.Note* Can't make sense IF YOU PEOPLE DON'T LOOK!Con: Atheist can have hope and faith in a lot of things, they just don’t have it in God.Note* Can't find God UNLESS YOU LOOK!2. The problem of evil: FACT- atheist ARE the performers of Evil! Course once they’re in prison, they do get religious, quick, fast and in a hurry don’t they. Do you know that now only 0.7 of the prison population are atheist NOW? Hmmm I’ll have to find that statistic some where. Radical Islam included in this group. Nuts, you know.3. The argument from inconsistent revelations: FACT- To presume NO HELL exist solely based on peoples differing views on Hell, is unintelligent, reckless and extremely careless behavior when it is obvious upon reflection, that the only conflict arrives from the severity of punishment, not that there will NOT be one. To default to no agreement no Hell, clearly demonstrates lack of reason.4. The rejections of concepts that cannot be falsified: FACT- to deny empirical evidence that is simply NOT deniable is imbecilic at worse, Stupid at best.Con: My opponent claims atheism is stupid and has no basis in facts. However I contend that the most logical position to have on a specific topic when there is a lack of evidence is to have a lack of belief.Con: I have never seen any evidence presented in my lifetime of a God, so it is most logical to have a lack of belief in all Gods.Con: Unless Pro can offer up some evidence of a God, it is stupid to have a lack of belief in a God.Con: Atheist can have hope and faith in a lot of things; they just don’t have it in God.Note* Direct evidence that Con and all other atheist, “NEVER BOTHERED TO LOOK” demanding empirical evidence, but refusing to acknowledge them even when they cannot BE DENIED!5.The argument for non-belief: FACT: A philosophical argument that asserts inconsistency between existence of God and the World in which people fail to recognize Him, cannot seriously be considered facts for nonexistence! As has been shown and verified by record, the largest part of humanity not ONLY recognizes Him, but is either in active worship of Him, or are continuing their search FOR Him. That 1.1 Billion people (atheist) cannot recognize Him, (as has been established and demonstrated Atheist DO NOT LOOK!) when 6.67 Billion people CAN is obviously not an intelligible argumentwhen based on fact.Con: My opponent claims atheism is stupid and has no basis in facts. However I contend that the most logical position to have on a specific topic when there is a lack of evidence is to have a lack of belief.Con: I have never seen any evidence presented in my lifetime of a God, so it is most logical to have a lack of belief in all Gods.Con: Atheist can have hope and faith in a lot of things, they just don’t have it in God.Con: Unless Pro can offer up some evidence of a God, it is stupid to have a lack of belief in a God.6.Many atheist hold that atheism is a more parsimonious worldview than Theism: FACT- 6.67 Billion Theist is hemispheres away from 1.1 Billion atheist, clearly had one BOTHERED to live in the real world rather than the cage of their mind, thay would have easily known THE TRUTH. Nope not the atheist, their just on cruise control through life, until of course they crash and yes BURN! Snap out of it people, before it’s too late!You see atheist, the Theist are the worldview, not atheism, in accordance with requirement for Burden of proof, it falls to YOU, to show “God doesn’t exist” and that atheism is the correct view, not our Burden, because we are the statis que, NOT YOU!in closing you simply must wake up now atheist:Your eternity is only a heartbeat away!-a car crash-a stray Bullet-an unexpected stroke-You have an appointment and you are going to die on time!-No accidents in Gods Kingdom-Where WILL you find yourself? How sure are you-What IS the basis of your conviction?Your right to choose ends upon your death, I KNOW. Can you truly say the same? The responsibility is yours, as is its consequence.People want to make it someone else's job to "prove" Gods existence too THEM. Wrong my friend, I have no such requirement, Mine is to tell you as is required in Ezekiel 3:18-1918When I say to a wicked person, ‘You will surely die,’ and you do not warn them or speak out to dissuade them from their evil ways in order to save their life, that wicked person will die for[b] their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood. 19But if you do warn the wicked person and they do not turn from their wickedness or from their evil ways, they will die for their sin; but you will have saved yourself.Consider yourselves so warned. Seek Him while He may yet BE found.One atheist complained that I need to keep everything in less than 5 paragraphs .... made it hard for him to concentrate ... so let me give you friendly advise.Go one paragraph at a time and take notes .... K? ......K!