All places of worship need to fall, as no stone shall be upon another.

Address the topic header as you continue to even consider it as I have stated once already in the debate. This is twice. Once a fool twice an idiot three times an inability to comprehend. First off, don't come to assumptions that lead to contempt. Secondly, you have not advised me is your address to this debate is a philosophical standpoint or a philosophical-scientific standpoint? Thirdly, you have done no more than used ad hominins and put what I have put forward as conjecture when I have put forward more than enough evidence of why, All places of worship need to fall, as no stone shall be upon another. Forthy it's not all about you and me. It's all about us. You can't even comprehend that the Pope is Catholic, not a Christian he tries to be but he has trillions of dollars of wealth at hand and the people still die for no justifiable reason, as lack of food or shelter or from the unruly patterns of climate change is not rational reasoning, when he of the like "as you have put it so arrogantly" the smart people, put there own want's before the needs of whom they are supposedly defending from the tyranny of the governing forces and supposed acts of God "climatic events" I have also asked you within this debate to address the topic header and I suppose as I must reluctantly point out to you that you can't grasp hold of what "as no stone shall be upon another." even refers too. As that is what should be attacked here not me personally as you continue to do so in every con statement within your last address. So let me spell it out for you; no stone shall be upon another. Means the structure of the law within places of worship needs to be changed to be a more humane approach for the people and by the people. Before Jesus Christ returns. For this is pre-warning. This message is not for the likes of you that hide behind your own apathy as to justify your own inhumane nature. If you think that the world doesn't need to be given back to the children as I have reminded you and any other that truly comprehends rational reasoning as you seem to be addressing this debate with no more than logical reasoning from a philosophical-scientific standpoint, then you have comprehension issues from practised apathy that has caused a disposition within your own prefrontal cortex from the hurdle that you put in front of yourself, that you expect others to jump over as well. You dwell within the mind of a sociopath it's that simple because you resort to violence when you are at the losing end of the playing field. "Verbal abuse is a violent act" It's not your fault it's the world that we live in that creates people of that nature. We are a product of the environment that we are subjected to "within reason" and the first sign of intelligence is the ability to adept. Have you the ability to mean what you say and say what you mean when mean isn't what comes from the heart. It's what you wish upon another you wish upon yourself. If you know the difference between empathy and sympathy then you'll meet humility. But dull the point of your double-edged tongue and keep the edges sharp as it always cuts both ways. Rational reasoning Then you can truly say, Peace be with you as all praise and glory belong to Nature our own existence creator. Amen But if you have trouble grasping hold of unconditional love that only a few ever can or have then this statement would be more so fitting. Logical reasoning. Peace be with you as all praise and glory belong to Nature our own existence creator of intelligent design of the known universe. Amen