Who should be the next POTUS?? Trump(Pro)....Clinton(Con)

Pro-Clinton Rebuttals: 1. If Hillary was for Women's Rights, she wouldn't be accepting money from Saudi Arabia.[1] Saudi Arabia does not respect Women's Rights. Here is a short list of what women cannot do: Go anywhere without a male chaperone(mostly relatives), Drive a Car, Wear clothes or make-up that "show off their beauty," Are required to limit the amount of time spent with men they are not related to, Go for a swim, Compete freely in sports, and Try on clothes when shopping.[2] If she truly supported women's rights, she shouldn't be accepting donations from Saudi Arabia. Mr. Trump believes that Planned Parenthood shouldn't include abortions. He has said that as long as Planned Parenthood Includes abortions, he will not fund it. He has also said that Planned Parenthood helps many women with cervical and breast cancer.[3] However Mr. Trump is pro-life unless it's a case of rape, incest, or health of the mother.[4] I do not understand why women would want to abort babies, when it was their own option to have one. 2. Dylann Roof got a gun due to clerical errors. Comey said the FBI made the error due to a breakdown in the background check system and confusion with paperwork between the FBI, local police departments and county jurisdictions.[5] Some sources said that the FBI could have asked for the gun back with the confusion[6], so it's unfair to blame this on the so called Charleston Loophole. Neither Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, nor Syed Farook or his wife were on the terrorist watchlist or no fly list when they purchased their guns. [7][8] The terrorist watchlist and and no fly list do not apply to Sandy Hook and Aurora, so I do not understand what Con's objective in bringing those two up is. A Harvard study shows that more guns equals less violent crime.[9] To ban "suspected" terrorists...keyword suspected is in violation of a due process of law which is guaranteed by the Constitution. Until one can prove that the gun will cause harm, they cannot ban a person from buying a gun. 3. The rich and the powerful that Clinton talks about are the same people giving her money for her campaign by lobbying. This again proves her hypocrisy. Clinton has been influenced by lobbyists from Walmart, Wall Street, BP, Goldman Sachs, and even Saudi Arabia.[10] She has collected 100s of millions of dollars from SuperPACs as well.[11] Mr. Trump financed 76% of his primary campaign with the other 26% coming from individual donations from merchandise and etc.[12] 4. Putting coal miners out of work is not the solution to Climate Change. Hillary has said that she will put coal miners out of work and put many coal companies out of business.[13] Climate Change may be a problem, or it may not be a problem, but it shouldn't affect American workers in any way, shape or form. There are some facts listed on this website as to why climate change isn't real. http://thehill.com... Trump plans to make America energy independent by increasing domestic production. He is also for the Keystone XL pipeline which will bring more jobs to the U.S.[14] In summary Hillary wants to take away jobs of Americans and plans to fund billions into an idea that is highly debatable. Even if it is real, American efforts will lower it by 1/100 of a degree(Celsius) as said on the source I provided. Anti-Trump Rebuttals: 1. "The two sides eventually came to terms. On June 10, 1975, they signed an agreement prohibiting the Trumps from 'discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling.' The Trumps were ordered to 'thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis' with the Fair Housing Act. The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties." This case does not acknowledge that Trump knowingly discriminated against minorities. My opponents claim is completely false that the government "won" the case when it does not mention anywhere in the resolution that Trump knowingly discriminated. Another thing to consider...."In the signed statement, the employee claimed that the Justice Department lawyer who replaced Goldweber, Donna Goldstein, told him to 'lie' or risk being 'thrown in jail.'" So there go the so called "codes." If Mr. Trump was really racist, he wouldn't rent to blacks, but he did as stated in Con's source. John R. O'Donnell left the Trump Organization and joined a competitor. [15]Those comments on Mr. Trump are bound to be biased and untrue. Mr. Trump is not racist. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, has accepted donations from the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazi groups.[16] 2. My opponent's claim about Trump saying: You have to treat women like s**t is flawed. The article in which Mr. Trump said this, referred to women who liked being abused because that's what they want. I strongly urge voters and Con to look at this video which explains the context in detail. This clearly shows how liberals will twist anything for their own gain. https://m.youtube.com... Mr. Trump was obviously joking about his daughter. Everyone started to laugh in the video. Another case of how liberals will twist anything for their gain. My opponent has not provided any sources for Mr. Trump calling women "fat pigs, dogs, and disgusting animals." As a result I rate this claim as false. As for Carly Fiorina, Mr. Trump was referring to her persona. Carly Fiorina also criticized Barbara Boxer's hair during her 2010 Senate Campaign [17] And to be honest, are you really gonna call that sexism because the White House criticized Mr. Trump's hair.[18] If Mr. Trump is sexist then the White House and Carly Fiorina are too. 3. I have defended Mr. Trump and am not a person to accept defeat so easily Looking forward to Con's rebuttals of my arguments. Thanks for a good debate!! Sources: [1]http://www.mintpressnews.com... [2]http://www.theweek.co.uk... [3]http://www.factcheck.org... [4]http://www.cnn.com... [5]http://crimeresearch.org... [6]http://www.nbcnews.com... [7]http://thehill.com... [8]http://dailycaller.com... [9]http://www.law.harvard.edu... [10]http://www.ibtimes.com... [11]https://www.opensecrets.org... [12]http://www.cnn.com... [13]https://m.youtube.com... [14]http://www.cfr.org... [15]http://articles.philly.com... [16]https://stubhillnews.com... [17]http://www.cnn.com... [18]https://www.washingtonpost.com...