Politics, Bans

Now the idea is not conservatism vs liberalism, it's liberals should be SENT TO ANTARCTICA. I really don't even have to debate this round, you have failed in your BoP, but is Obama that bad?Obama cares about the people of America.He is for equal rights.He's for providing eveyone with healthcareHe's for womens rightsHe has lowered taxes on the middle class.He is pro environmentHe is pro peaceThe stock market is doing well. The defecit has been reduced. Due to the extremem nature of this debate, I'd say you have not fulfilled your BoP. However if you would like to debate if Obama has been a good president I will be happy to do so. Also immigration is good for the economy. Positive Economic Benefits Of Immigration: S.744- Bill offering a detailed strategy to legalize approximately eleven million undocumented laborers.According to the CBO(Congressional Budget Office) Enacting the bill will reduce the federal defecit.(The provisions of the bill are considered in its entirety, which is an important distinction.)Like amnesty, the bill also provides an incentive for immigrants to enter legally. Amnesty provides a reason for illegal immigrants to turn themselves in and enter legally. Thus S.744 and amnesty both promote legal immigration. So the question is does immigration hurt the economy, because the amnesty law promotes legal immigration.Point Of Consensus: It is agreed upon by all studies, on both sides of the debate, that increases in legal immigration will have a positive economic impact and raise tax revenue. Given this fact alone I should win the debate.P1) Increased legal immigration positively effects the economy.P2) A provision or law that enables and promotes legal immigration, positvely effects the economy. P3)The amnesty law enables and promotes legal immigration. C1) The amnesty law positively effects the economy.P2 neccesarily follows from P1.If P1->`33;P2P2->`33;P3{P1,P2,P3} ->`33; C1Only p1 needs defending.On P1: It is said that illegal immigrants don't pay taxes, this is untrue but I guess it is fair to say they don't pay equal tax. I'm not sure what a "Fair share" is, I would argue the top 1% don't pay enough, but that's a different point. Obviously legalized immigrants will pay more taxes if legalized.The taxes from immigrants being legalized will result in a GDP growth of 0.3%-0.8%(80-150 billion dollars). Each legalized immigrant would contribute $10,000-$17,000. Contribution= (X-Y)X=Addition to economyY=Expenses (Parameters obtained from three studies).CAP-$10,000CBO-$12,000IPC-$17,000Wages: Wages would increases for newly legalized and natives.IPC:X=NativesY=Newly legalizedWage: X$74-$162^Y:$4000-$6000^CAP: X: NA(but given Y, it's safe to assume some kind of increase)Y:15%^CBO:{X,Y}: 10 years: 0.1% decrease: 20 years: 0.5%^Job Creation: IPC: 83,500 jobs created.CAP: 121,000 jobs createdCBO: (2014-2023): 600,000 jobs created per year!Specific Demographic Analysis: IPC: Positive wage increase overall(especially in lower demographic)CAP: Increase in aggregate wage bill.CBO: At the highest percent of wages there will be a 0.3% drop and in the middle sector there will be a 0.5% increase.http://www.usamnesty.org......http://www.nber.org......http://www.jstor.org......http://www.cbo.gov......Vote Con <3