Drinking, sex before marriage, and drugs is a moral issue and engaging in them is immoral

First, "A person will always have some sort of subconscious reaction to any sort of thing that affects them (and technically, everything affects them in some way), thus they do not decide consciously themselves, but rather their own instinct, or subconscious, if you will, does it for them (Freudian Theory). " Everything does not effect everyone in some way. A kid eating a peach in China would not necessarily affect me or you in any manner. It may, but because there is a possibility of this not happening you cannot state absolutely that everything affects you in some way. Unless you can prove that every little thing and happenstance can affect every person in any manner, your statement is false. Also, the subconscious is a part of the human mind that science knows very little about and unless you can give proof that instinct or subconscious makes you make a judgement or moral decision about everything that affects you then I fail to see how your statement about the subconscious making moral decisions is true. I can also give a counterexample. A stick falling in front of me as I walk affects me but I do not make any moral judgement about it. Even if I did so subconsciously, there is no way to prove that I did. A theory made by Freud is hardly evidence unless other scientists have backed it up with experiments especially because Freud faked most of his data regarding his patients, he also only published information on 8 patients (little known fact found in the book "100 things your teachers don't want you to know"). Secondly, "what I'm basically arguing is the idea of the Butterfly Effect in regards to our current actions affecting future actions (Multiple researches explain this). If I do one action now, even if it is indirect, it will have SOME sort of impact on the future, no matter how small. " If researches explain this I would like you to cite them in your arguments. Also, I fail to see how this can be proved seeing as we cannot know the future until it happens and I doubt everything that a person ever did was recorded so yeah. My counterexample is: If I decide to do one sit-up today, how does that affect the future in any way absolutely? I mean that yes, it MAY affect the future in some way but I can find no solid evidence saying that it has to affect the future because it happened. In regards to your rebuttal to my banana-London argument, if I was talking about me(which I was but that's irrelevant), I have no potassium deficiency and so your argument would be meaningless to me and many other people. The only given in the situation of the example is that: this person will make the decision to go to college in London in the future and eats a banana in the present. Unless you can make a direct link on how the banana affects the London decision without using a something that is not a given in the situation(the potassium deficiency). Thus, I do not think this story is valid because you added a factor that may not occur. I can find no factor that directly relates to the givens that would absolutely prove that the banana would ALWAYS affect the decision to go to London no matter who the person(this includes everything about them physically and mentally and their situation). ;)