Donald Trump's "Muslim Ban" is unconstitutional.

Thank You for your swift response. I agree, some people are fleeing these countries because of the violence. However, it seems to me, you don't know why, Mr. Trump has banned everyone. I assumed that you would know why, but it's my fault for not explaining, so I will now. The simple fact is, you can't tell the difference between a terrorist and a refugee. ISIS has publicly said that they will infiltrate the refugee population.[1] We can already see the results of this in Europe because of France, Belgium, and Germany. Unless you want to gamble with American lives, we must figure out how to tell the difference, and until that, we cannot take any risks. I will respond according to the arguments and relation to other. I apologize for the letters not being in order. c) Not all the people within the countries are Muslim. There are Christians included in the ban to. It's based on nationality, not ethnicity. He isn't just discriminating against any religion or ethnicity. If he was, he'd just ban a religion, not all of them! a) My opponent has not specified what the EPC is, so I will provide the 14th Amendment and the section I believe seems to be most relevant. The 14th Amendment: Section 1. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."[2] Let's look at the history of this amendment. The 14th Amendment was ratified by Congress after the Civil War, which gave rights to African Americans and established that anyone born or naturalized, are citizens of the U.S. and therefore all of the rights apply to them as well. As I'm sure readers can tell. This is simply to ensure states don't discriminate blacks, as it is now a federal law and does not relate to the 10th Amendment which is states' rights. How does this have anything to do with immigrants coming into the country? But I will also provide the the rights of the United States Customs and Border Protection. They are special as they do not have to follow the 4th Amendment. Here's an excerpt "In conducting all activities other than routine or spontaneous law enforcement activities, Federal law enforcement officers may consider race, ethnicity, gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity only to the extent that there is trustworthy information, relevant to the locality or time frame, that links persons possessing a particular listed characteristic to an identified criminal incident, scheme, or organization, a threat to national or homeland security, a violation of Federal immigration law, or an authorized intelligence activity."[3] The trustworthy info, is that ISIS has said they will infiltrate the population, and therefore by probable cause are inadmissible to the United States of America. They are the ones that can reject entry to the country, but this is for people, who already have a visa, and are already here when the ban took affect. To people who don't and are wanting to obtain one, they will be rejected, as is the right of a sovereign state protected by the law I provided above.[4] I've already explained that the 1st Amendment allows for the free exercise of a religion. No one is being told when they arrive to the country, that you cannot pray to God or read your holy book. You can also establish your religion there, no one is going to tell, you can't convert people here to Islam or Christianity. Trump doesn't hate Islam. He hates Radical Islam, which our past administration couldn't even say because they were to politically correct. Currently, we cannot tell the difference between the 2 in people. The Muslim announcement actually increased his support. He announced the ban around December 27th, 2015.[11] He has 36% support among the GOP on around December 16, 2015 according to Morning Consult Poll.[12] The next Morning Consult Poll showed him at 42% support.[13] His support increases, so Americans agreed with him. d) My opponent seems to be cherry picking certain clauses from the executive order. In the section I'm about to provide, it explains why minorities will be prioritized. "(e) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the admission of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest -- including when the person is a religious minority in his country of nationality facing religious persecution, when admitting the person would enable the United States to conform its conduct to a preexistent international agreement, or when the person is already in transit and denying admission would cause undue hardship -- and it would not pose a risk to the security or welfare of the United States."[5] Religious persecution is the key there, not to mention it has to be confirmed by Rex Tillerson and John Kelly. I suggest my opponent stop cherry picking their arguments. It's not favoritism, it's called convert or die. The country was established because of religious persecution in England. Establishing it as favoritism is ludicrous. e) I don't believe innocent people want to kill us. But I believe that a small risk is still a risk. The vetting process may be good, but chances are still there. Actually, the refugee program failed as the Ohio State shooter was a Somali Refugee, and so were others that I mentioned before. Before 9/11, airport security was terrible, now it is extremely high security.[6] The Pulse Nightclub's shooter's father was a supporter of the Afghan Taliban and was seen at the infamous Hillary Clinton's rally. Just proves that terrorists support liberals and their refugee policies. The father also hated homosexuals and as a result, may have influenced his son in such a way.[7] If the liberals stop stereotyping this ban as a Muslim Ban, then maybe ISIS won't recruit people. It's the liberals that portray it this way even if it isn't. Kuwait, a Muslim majority country has also imposed a ban from Muslim Majority Muslims. [8]Where's the outrage on that? Where was the outrage when these same Muslim Majority countries banned people of Jewish descent?[9] The mainstream media, especially CNN, will continue to fund these lies, and everyone already knows that CNN is fake news. Cartoon Network has a better rating than CNN.[10] Green card holders aren't affected by this travel ban. Remember that..... I hope my opponent can understand that this IS NOT a Muslim Ban. Good Luck and Thank You. Sources: [1]http://www.wnd.com... [2]https://www.law.cornell.edu... [3]https://www.justice.gov... [4]https://travel.state.gov... [5]http://www.npr.org... [6]http://www.farecompare.com...#/ [7]http://www.cbsnews.com... [8]https://www.moroccoworldnews.com... [9]http://www.dailywire.com...#! [10]http://yournewswire.com... [11]http://www.politico.com... [12]https://elections.huffingtonpost.com... [13]https://elections.huffingtonpost.com...