A God must have created the universe.

IntroductionI will be proposing a couple different ways in which we can have the universe without a god creating it (as just having a single example of how the universe could exist without god falsifies Pro's statement that god must have created the universe. In this round I will only be bringing up my own points, I will save rebuttals for the next round.Hawking ArgumentIn this point I will be using an argument that Stephen Hawking made, but formalized[1].P1) Causes must precede their effects in timeP2) There is no time prior to the beginning of time (the origin of the universe)C) Therefore, the universe cannot have a causeP1 is validated through the principals of causality.P2 is based off of relativity, where time is another dimension of space, and where there is no space there is no time. No space before the big bang means no time before the big bang. This works under the A-Theory of Time if time is a dimension of space, and therefore under that metaphysical model it is possible that the universe did not have a cause, and therefore was not caused by god.Krauss ArgumentIn this point I will be using Krauss' points to show that if the universe has a cause that it does not necessarily need to be god[2].One discovery in quantum mechanics is that empty space is not really empty, it is bubling with virtual particles that pop in and out of existence. These fluctuations can explain where all the matter/anti-matter/energy in the universe came from[3].Furthermore, as quantum physics is a field of fluctuations, quantum gravity, if such a thing exists, would almost certainly allow fluctuations as well. Gravity, as we currently understand it, deals with spacetime. If you put these two things together then we would have the ability for spacetime to fluctuate in and out of existence.This allows for space, time, matter, anti-matter, energy etc. to come out of nothing without the need of god, only the need of quantum mechanics.Tenseless Cosmological ArgumentIn this point I will be showing that under the B-Theory of Time that god cannot have created the universe.P1) If God created the universe, the universe has a cause.P2) The universe can only have a cause if tensed facts exist.P3) Tensed facts do not exist.C1) The universe does not have a cause (follows from P2 and P3).C2) God did not create the universe (follows from P1 and C1).Defense of Premise 1:I am sure that this does not need much for explanation. If God created the universe, the logically god is the cause and the universe is the effect.Defense of Premise 2:The principals of causality require for there to be a movement of time. A before the effect, an after the cause, etc. This requires tensed facts.This point is seemingly agreed upon by all time theorists, even William Lane Craig[4].Defense of Premise 3:To defend premise 3 I will be proposing that the most probable theory of time is the B-Theory of Time.Effects like relativity and time dialation support the B-Theory of Time while refuting the A-Theory of Time (the A-Theory of Time is the theory of time that allows tensed facts to exist).Further support for this premise comes from recent experiments in quantum mechanics. Under the B-Theory of Time, the progression of time is an illusion, and time does not really pass. If one were to have "god view", a view of the universe from outside of it, the universe would appear static.A recent study has shown that the progress of time is an illusion caused from quantum entanglement, and that if you did have "god view" that the universe would actually appear static[5]. ConclusionI have shown ways in which it is possible that god does not have to have created the universe.I will make my rebbutals next round. Good luck to Pro.Sources[1] http://www.hawking.org.uk...[2] [3] http://universe-review.ca...[4] http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com...[5] https://medium.com...