Atheism is a Lie

Now I am religious. But As such, I feel that I am competent enough to actually provide a Valid example of How atheism is plausibly Real, as apposed to the stereotypical atheist rebuttals which are close minded and founded on nonchalant. So listen, because this is a fare assertion. First, I will present where My belief structure overlaps a plausible atheistic approach: God does not oppose the laws of physics, in any religion, or in any belief structure, or in any theology - thus we can determine that God is to a measurable extent a-biotic, in that he is restricted to a founding principal. Via this principal, we can deduct that all qualities of the imagination, philosophy and physics are accounted for in the nature that is 'God'. - before I continue. We are suggesting not that "God", 'the mechanics of reality, the substances of and all that without substance taken into a holistic account' is not real, but that he is not the "Personable God" associated with Atheistic disbelief. God by definition of all religions ahs always been, 'the mechanics of reality, the substances of and all that without substance taken into a holistic account' and has been applied in such a manner - We are stipulating over a very ZIONic trait of religion that God simply is the term used to describe our reality as a Whole. I personally think Zionism is stupid, because the Zionist holds so much enmity against "The person, God" that they wouldn't know the difference between him and the state of their enmity delusionally confronting them. If God, were in fact to be entirely Unpersonable, then The story of Creation itself would not be remotely in need or revision ~ "There was matter, and then from that matter came the perfect condition to produce light, the light consumed the matter, left marks proving the event, rationally depicted a map of how DNA and cells spontaneously came into existence together from the present matter and energy, followed by the first extra-terrestrial extension of the new light energy." However, if there was no Creation as scientifically proven there was, as it had been depicted, then The principals and characteristics of the "character God" remain irrefutable real and contingent as a portion of our reality. This does not mean however that God is guaranteed to be an individual. And although, strictly speaking this is not what personification of God literally forces us to accept as a teaching, the contrary is the only atheistic approach to a contrary belief. The insolence of Pastaphareanism is endless - "noodle brain", "dick-noodle-brain"... they're just idiots. BUT, God not being a person is equally acceptable as God's being a person. To further elaborate, God as a whole, can as a human being, be perceived in perfect complexion to only reflect his Physical qualities, and the qualities attached to his physical nature. We can perceive how other qualities may exist, but can not identify them. These traits explain why the Universe exists, and they must exist, and thus are a contingent portion of the Whole; God being Holistically everything. -- where was I -- Oh yes, Just as a Human can be evaluated to only be physical matter, hosting non material qualities such as philosophy and imagination. This means that if the human was entirely A-symbiotic, and capable of thought, that the Universe as a Whole can too, be an ENTIRELY self aware entity through a Balance of Physics which dictates it is Universally connected. But does That make "God" a person, personable, or an individual? Stipulably, we can theoretically come tot he conclusion that the answer is NO. BUT as a religious creed, we know that God can only be known through elements of himself, The Word(Hope), the Light(Faith), and that the whole is disconnected from us personally as to not draw the attention of the cosmos upon us individual as it were to seem. However, When you close your eyes and you pray, whether as simple self-reflection not directed at being prayer or worship - you worship by default by appreciating God's qualities which do not impose or corrupt prosperity, and you curse him with false ego and wicked (selfish) intentions - The universe as a Whole records your thoughts in the nature of it's equilibrium, eternally recorded as an unchanging aspect of the past which will eternally effect the future, hopefully only through wavelengths and not through wicked actions as karma would suggest. What I am asserting, is that just because your prayers are recorded, and "heard" by the Eternal entity does not mean that the enriching process exceeds delusion *Factually. However it brings joy, and respite, revelation, and honesty, hallucination, insight and motivation, clarity, and reassurance ~ not because you delusionally believe in God, but because that is the nature of reflecting upon him, real or not. Why anyone would reject scriptures, which were they produced atheistically, dictate that their laws were produced scientifically to directly reprove human behaviour, which was specifically pointed. There were not only in scriptures but all general human history the actual causes of deprivation. Reasons to suggest that these laws are perfect in every way. That God was dictated in many cultures, all over the world as being the Element of complete enlightenment, which alone led to prosperity, social security, Genuine happiness and equality. These Religions were not used to control the people, but only to attack governments that tyrannized them, and to attack bigots in society. Yet, this does not indicate God is a Person, but only that as a Person, we are certainly capable of Personalizing the Entire Universe into a considerate element that should we open up to it, can absorb us into it's infinite capacity to produce Philosophy and Theory in an Immaterial realm to liquidate our psyche, even should we die, in an eternal element. That eternal state of our psyche living on outside the body because we connected tot he Universe as a whole, can guarantee a reincarnation, but Does not State that God must be Personable. YET his son IS, his son is that element which we may simply establish ourselves, that lives in us alone personally, But it is the actual Child of the reality we live in that comes into existence with us and shares in our own spiritual journey through Only this one Physical Reality. So. Is Atheism Real? NO, of course not. But can we pretend for literary purposes? if you think it can help you get rich, I don't see why God would be offended. Just don't advocate bigotry. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I have 3344 more character's, and I am interested in using them. I have currently forgone the actual story events of the Bible. Other Mythologies are primarily, myth's, stories and anecdotes used to explain human nature, the fruits of labour and their rewards, aspects of our reality etc... But the Bible is somewhat Unique is resounding scriptures. Now, if we look at Noah, for instance: It is not forceably suggested that God spoke to Noah with a booming voice from the heavens that he heard as an actual voice. Noah simply could have said to himself, "these people are idiots (according to the laws of fawking reality)" and built a boat. He still heard the Word of God, and built a boat, via wisdom with the wood God, that reality, provided {Saying thanks and alms to our circumstances with the humility to not provoke any enmity among his people}. Now if he left he continent and they all died, or became American, and died, or if there was a Great flood - Maybe just maybe, the Flood was a flood of Blood. But none the less, We saved the Book of Creation, the Turtle that rose from the ocean, on the third day of creation, leaving proof That the story of Creation was credible. -a nd Maybe there was an Actual Flood. And when Babel fell, the story in the Book of Mormon was real and they sent ships to America then... or both. And then perhaps even Jews came to America 2500 years ago. THREE BOAT journeys in 6000 years. This changes not one iota of the scripture, the lessons they teach, or the true foundations of the faiths of the congregation. The yeast of the Pharisees NEVER under any circumstance reflect true faith, the religion from which their teachings were taken, Nor does it actually afflict the religion. BUT, were God to be entirely A-symbolic, he would still be the exact same as a Personable God. Perfect, because he Parameters of God are determined by nothing else but his nature, and we must structure our enlightenment, productivity and legacy with them. This is simply good literature. But can you contend with that? Can you assure me that my faith is absolute? Or am I alone to my God alone to testify to me ritually and routinely in miraculous ways which defy the seemingly logical requirements of an atheistic existence? { Or would they > ? :) hmmm. So religious I can beat religion coherently in a debate. Try using this tactic against me. I'll put you to the wall, and make you look stupid. you know what, I was about to post this - there was a swear 'as' with two "S"'s and the voice instructed me to write more, so I didn't post it after fixing it, and here I am - SO, the A-symbolic God Has now to contend with Noah: ~ The world is filled with sinners, and it is not a perfect deed for God to abolish human life, in a mathematical evaluation of the value of life, because Noah presents hope for the future generations - where arrogance is not in need of needless reproving - as God will never alleviate "ignorance" which is only 'arrogance', SO mathematically, the Universe which is watching in all despair Humanity reject prosperity and wisdom out of selfishness, Sends forth a Great surge of Karma which changes the Thermal Dynamic presence of the World to force the 190 000 km's of atmosphere into a tight atmosphere, forming great volumes of water, and flooding the earth to solve this Galactic trauma.