Anarchy is the true means of liberty

I thank my opponent for this debateI however have noticed that many of my opponents arguments are flawed since it doesn't seem as if my opponent has a good understanding of what Anarchy truly is:Anarchy: An Anarchic ideal would be freedom from Capitalism and the Government since anarchists view both of these as limiting to true freedom. Why Capitalism?Because Capitalism is basically as system where everyone competes for destructive power. Capitalism is a con. Why are crimes committed? Many common crimes such as theft, rape, homicide are by products of the current system. Then the current system creates laws and punishments for those crimes not realizing that it is that very system that is causing these crimes.Why do people steal? People steal because they need food, they need clothes, they need supplies. How come they don't have these basic things? It is because they are poor. And why are they poor? Because in order for Capitalism to work, there needs to be people on the top and people on the bottom of the pyramid. The people on the top restrict the freedom of the people feeding from the bottom by taking most the power. They have the "freedom" to take away the freedom of others but is that is not true freedom. It is just abuse of power which bounds freedom down. Why do people rape? It is said that men rape women for dominance over a woman. This is cause by society and standards with gender roles. This wouldn't happen in an anarchy as anarchy wouldn't have sexual standards or oppressive gender standards. This wouldn't cause the problem of rape. Why do people kill? Many reasons. They feel wronged, or they kill to steal, or they kill in order to not get caught for rape, or kill in order to gain fear etc. If people cooperated in a equal society and had none of these oppressive things happening, there wouldn't need to be a reason to commit these crimes. In the capitalist system the whole working class sells its labor power to the employing class. The workers build factories, make machinery and tools, and produce goods. The employers keep the factories, the machinery, tools and goods for themselves as their profit. The workers get only wages. This arrangement is called the wage system. Learned men have figured out that the worker receives as his wage only about one-tenth of what he produces. The other nine-tenths are divided among the landlord, the manufacturer, the railroad company, the wholesaler, the jobber, and other middlemen. It means this: Though the workers, as a class, have built the factories, a slice of their daily labor is taken from them for the privilege of using those factories.That's the landlord's profit What is left then - one-tenth of the real worth of the worker's labor-is his share, his wage. Can you guess now why the wise Proudhon said that the possessions of the rich are stolen property? Stolen from the producer, the worker. The whole capitalist system rests on such robbery. The whole system of law and government upholds and justifies this robbery. That's the order of things called capitalism, and law and government are there to protect this order of things. Do you wonder that the capitalist and employer, and all those who profit by this order of things, are strong for 'law and order'? But where do you come in? What benefit have you from that kind of 'law and order'? Don't you see that this 'law and order' only robs you, fools you, and just enslaves you? http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu......;The Government: The nature of the government is naturally oppressive. The fact that the government controls most things that we do in a daily basis is oppressive and controlling. Any of our rights are not 100 % there all the time as the government can take away your rights any time they want. Voting doesn't make much of a difference as the government has a two-party system (making almost no room for third parties) and the electoral college ultimately decides who is president. Neither Democratic nor Republican democracies make much of a difference as the government obviously doesn't want to give the people too much freedom or control over the way the country is run. As Emma Goldman once said "If voting changed anything, they would make it illegal."The Government steals money from the people and wastes it on deals with China, trade, profit building activities, war, campaigns, weapons for war, oil, etc.The Government gets on by, by convincing the people that without Government there is no order. Why is it more idealistic to believe that the people can control their own lives and cooperate to make a society to work than keeping the corrupt current system and expecting it to suddenly "get better?" http://www.youtube.com... Now after that lesson I will refute my opponents argumentsTo you freedom cannot be obtained? Why is that?That is because the system has done so much damage that everyone believes that everything will stay that same and that freedom can never be obtained.Security: In true Anarchy, there would be little to no crime because there would no reason for crimes. There would be no reason to kill, rape, or steal as everyone is equal and free.But when there is crime, the person won't be imprisoned but has their own choice to receive therapy or not. They will not be forced to. The unfortunate people would obviously receive help from doctors, I don't see how that would change in Anarchism. Mentally disturbed people would receive help and the people will decide how to deal with the mentally disturbed. Remember, in an Anarchy, the rules would not be set in stone. The community ultimately decides what to do.Education: In a no money Anarchic system, schools would be built by people who would want to build them. You can recieve education if you like. Remember, it is always your choice. Everyone will be free no matter what age. But of course there are some authoritarian exceptions with parents and children but you should have a good reason to use authoritarian choices. It really dependsAnarchy most likely would start in a small town and work really well in a small town. It could spread but only if the people want to be under an anarchyIn the subject of property, you should know that there is a difference between property, and possession. Anarchy would not have private property but of course you have possessions. Here is a video explaining it:http://www.youtube.com...Rules: The people would establish rules in the society that they all agree onThe thing that is neccesary for a state of Anarchy to achieve liberty is the abolition of government, capitalism and the unity of the people to coexist peacefully and equally“To be GOVERNED is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be place under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored. That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality."General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century, translated by John Beverly Robinson (London: Freedom Press, 1923), pp. 293-294.” ― Pierre-Joseph Proudhon