Dont vote for John Huntsman, GOP primary 2012

1&9) my point is the population changes the impressiveness of the credential. You say you support huntsman because he has executive experience as govern of Utah. That same kind of experience is also found in Romney and Perry in spades. They are tried and tested in a superior way as governors. 2) my opponent conceded this point 3) The armed forces committee has had to keep informed on the social and cultural situation in the middle east to make there decisions on military matters. China is important to the U.S. in as much as its affects on our economy, the middle east has always been a important front in world politics. Small military power or not they are the countries that are always on the verge of going to war with someone else not china, the middle east is were the 9-11 attackers came from not China 4) my opponent conceded this point 5) as it isn’t a poll it in no way reflect reality and is based on the assumptions victory will be had by trying get the republican to appeal to the liberals and not the democrat appeal to the conservatives. 6) I did not ignore the other points, you repeatedly bring up that he was an ambassador in other bullets so I cover them in those. And when it comes to politics and mafia games, you should assume the worst not the best until proven otherwise. 7) That is my point I made about Trump and the others who didn’t jump in the race, they were not committed to the country, and since your now dropping the need to be committed I take it you concede this as a reason to support Huntsman over Romney or Santorum. 8) It’s a single act for the sake of PR, which when done by a politician, is by no stretch of the imagination evidence he’s not an elitist. He can go ‘play with the poor people’ all he wants it does not change his being an elitist were it matters, in his condescending attitude. Your complaints against Romney’s business experience I would expect to hear from a democrat, that’s how the free market works. Second off it completely ignores the companies that have prospered under Mitt Romney like STAPLES. Sure some companies are ‘eatin’ up but that’s how businesses work, there comes a time when its best to cut your losses and make the most of them. Being able to make the choice to ‘eat’ other companies IS a sign of leadership, as it shows when the horse is dead Romney will not go on in denial trying to save it by beating it, he just serves the meat up and has more grass to give to the live horses instead. Being in disagreement with others is not a bad thing for huntsman, what is bad is that its not done in respect. Romney in any interview he has been in has spoken with respect to those he engages with, even if they have there differences, Huntsman has shown he does not no how to do this. He has gone out of his way to insult me and other tea partiers like me who do not think evolution holds up against the facts. He could if he were presidential material try engaging with us as if we were not totally being disregarded intellectually like ‘what you I.D’ers may not have considered, or known….’ But no instead he chooses to just ignore us and call us stupid. Huntsman is like DDO’s Izbo when it comes to this matter, and seeing as Huntsman has gone out of his way to disregard my intellect and insult tea partiers everywhere its hard to see how we could ever come to his aid or support in the general election where this will all count. We are the hand that feeds the GOP and Huntsman has decided to bite us. Even if you are of moderate views like Huntsman, Huntsman is not willing to work with the rest of his party to get those positions accomplished. Romney on the other hand has shown he can work with tea partiers, and liberals all just the same to get the pragmatic solutions he has in his 59 point plan in place.