One piece is a better manga/anime than Naruto

-Rebuttal-My opponent argues that the arcs of Naruto contribute to character growth as opposed to just being a "comedic" arc that is just for "battle purposes". The example he used was that the first few volumes of Naruto feature the titular characters background and growth. Although this is fine and enjoyable in a manga, it does not prove that Naruto is better than One Piece. As I stated in my arguments although story arcs may contribute to background stories and the aims and ambitions of the One Piece characters, the storyline is better because it does not focus on the here and now as Naruto does but instead focuses on the future as all arcs are linked in one fashion or another to each other.The example I gave of interconnected storylines was of "haki". My opponent states that the introduction of haki in the primary chapter is "just a form of foreshadowing" and it only "occurs again in the main plotline, not in any minor plotlines until later". This is untrue although I do not wish to concentrate on examples haki appears in several story arcs ranging from the beginning of One Piece towards the middle and the end as is viewed by its use against the villain Hancock and its use by God Eneru and in early storyarcs. Haki appears frequently throughout the early chapters and the later chapters and although possibly a foreshadowing I am not denying it is, rather, I am stating that this foreshadowing aids in keeping the interest of the reader/viewer and makes a story arc a more interesting read than Naruto"s.First of all, to clarify, I'm debating that One Piece is not a better manga than Naruto not Naruto is a better manga than One Piece.To rebuttal my opponent's point of "haki". Yes, "haki" interconnects the story arc and again as I said earlier, only the main story arc. God Eneru or Hancock are both important characters that served its purpose in the main storyline. For example, when Rayleigh teachs "haki" to Luffy, he used Eneru as an example. Most of the minor plotlines in One Piece like foxy pirate are just there for battlemanga purpose but not really connect in the main storyline."the storyline is better because it does not focus on the here and now as Naruto does but instead focuses on the future"False, Naruto does not focus on here and now, throughout the story, the author has put together scene where past and present conflict against each other and make contradiction unlike what we would predict and that make the story very complex, unpredictable and fun to read. One Piece. on the other hand, does not focus on the future as much as so is Naruto. One Piece mainly focus on the present fighting scene between Luffy and another antagonist, though it keep referring about Luffy's dream of becoming the King of Pirate which is the same as Naruto's dream of becoming a Hokage. This does not prove that One Piece is superior to that of Naruto."Luffy carries the dream of becoming pirate king because in his childhood he and his friends made a dream to be the pirate king".Luffy does not have the dream of becoming the pirate king because of his childhood. He simply want to become a pirate king to prove himself to Shank and his brother, Ace. Whereas Naruto, his dream indeed come from the isolation that he felt and wish to accepted by become Hokage, but he doesn't want to be better than everyone. His goal to be Hokage, simplify as he wants to be acknowledge and want to protect the village. He also wants to become Hokage so that he will become known for protection for his family (village) instead of a monster who kill his parents. He also works really hard to achieve his goal and learn a lot of lessons on his journey. Luffy, however, seems pretty straightforward and predictable. He wants to be the Pirate King because he want to prove himself, not to be acknowledge. His dream can be compare to a person saying they will become the President of a country. Throughout the story, Luffy growth can easily be seen and predict, as he only lose against strong and important characters like the admirals and he wins all his fight in the minor story arc as well as early arc. "Although I can see the themes of Naruto, I cannot agree that they make the manga superior to One Piece."Again, I'm debating that One Piece is not superior."Sasuke disappears for most of the manga after leaving for revenge".I am not so sure about this point but anyhow, Sasuke's journey on revenge was easily seen and has been clearly plot out throughout the story. Even if he did disappear, the author did give flashback on his past and his journey to make clear to the reader."His motives are there but not truly brought out in the manga as a main theme unless Sasuke is directly involved". Yes, Sasuke is one of the main character and this theme is directly put on him. The theme itself show that a person will lead a dark life if they're consumed by revenge as is shown by Sasuke. "Luffy is not consumed by revenge like Sasuke is not a negative because he used it as an excuse to move on with his life and still attempt to take revenge for his brother. This proves that One Piece is a better manga than Naruto."Luffy doesn't get consume by revenge doesn't make One Piece a better manga than Naruto. It just two different stories. One get consume by revenge and lead a dark life whereas the other doesn't get consume. Both also use the revenge motive to get stronger. "I myself brought in the argument that a pirate named "Gin" was a nice man who turned out to be a villain that betrays the people who save him"1. Gin was never proven to be a good character at the start of that particular scene. He simply arouses sympathy due to his extreme hunger.2. Gin was part of the Don Krieg pirate which is well known as "bad".3. Gin was never proven to be a "nice person". At the last scene, he knocks Don Krieg unconscious because he felt they lost against Luffy and he also want to thanks for the food. This doesn't mean he's a good guy. He also did say he will come back one day.My opponent want to put an emphasize on this particular point"Unlike Naruto which I find predictable as either somebody starts losing and makes a comeback, another person interferes in the fight or the person that is no longer central to the plot is killed/beaten One Piece has a wide variety of plot twists that are fully utilized through characters personalities." I did address this point in my earlier statement but apparently fail to convince my opponent. My point was Lee (a character that we assume a good guy since he's a Leaf Village) lost against Garaa (a character we assume to be a bad guy with his killing intent and hatred). And in the later arc, Garaa also turn out to be a good guy and aid the Leaf Village in time of emergency. This wasn't predictable as my opponent said. Another point of mine is Itachi, a tragic hero, who was a coldblood murderer and hate his brother as we assume in the earlier arc turn out to be a person who turn himself into a villain to protect his brother, which is not predictable. Anyhow, if my point fail to convince my opponent, this still doesn't mean One Piece is superior than Naruto.I have finish rebut against all of my opponent's points.I thanks my opponent for the debate.