I think we should have UFC for under 10s

I'll start with rebuttals, then begin my argument. Rebuttal: "The purpose of this debate is to propose a solution to children under 10 committing criminal offences and misbehaving in school." How will beating up other kids make them behave? And what criminal offences? General Idea: "We would select the most ill behaved children and force them to fight. It would serve as a punishment and encourage better behaviour out of badly behaved children." Would it teach them better? Kids mostly get in trouble because they hit someone. They could've also swore, insult, or did something like rip apart another student's assignment, or drawing dildos. I don't see how fighting solves these, especially hitting. If anything, making them fight will make them think it's okay to hit others. "We would erect facilities especially for these fights, I also believe the taxes made of these cage fight events would generate millions of income and generate dozens if not hundreds of new job for referees and staff." Have you ever watched a WWE match? It involves beating other people up, and the fighters have unique moves, and tactics. Now, does this apply to a 5 year old? I don't see how little Tommy can do the 619, or even a suplex. If anything, the poor kids will either cry, sit there, or poop in their diapers. Participants: "We would send out a management team to survey every school and select only the most criminally hardened children to partake." What if the kid wants to beat up other kids? If the reason for being a "criminal" is being an outright bully, how is bullying more going to help? Anyways... "You have to fight until you win, otherwise there would be no need to actually try in the cage." And if they don't want to try? Justification: "It's true that children are committing more offences today, than ever before. Now we must enact some tough love and give the children of today a reason not to misbehave." Evidence of little Brocky being a bad boy? You can't assert that kids under 10 are 'criminals' unless you present a link. Also, will letting the kid beat up other people teach the kid to not beat up people? Argument: I have my own arguments as to why kids shouldn't beat up other kids, even in WWE. First, it'll only make things worse. Second, it'll be hard to get spectators. Violence begets more violence: If there's one thing we all have in common, it's ego. When we get praised for our actions, we feel proud of ourselves, and deem the action good. In WWE, it's okay to beat up your opponent. Not in a school environment. But what if by beating up Timmy, you get sent to fight little Dennis, who got sent to Little Kids Brawl, because he burned his assignment? Heh, I'd beat up Dennis, since LKB is about beating up other kids. The crowd cheers for you, because you beat up Dennis. That must mean violence is acceptable, right? So I'll beat up Susie, so I can beat up Bill. By allowing them to beat up others, you're teaching them violence is the answer. Eventually, they might beat up the teacher because they don't like her, then beating up more kids! Hard to gain views: For LKB, the criteria is kids under 10 years old. But young kids can't comprehend until they're around 6 years old (just an estimate). So you must be 6 - 10 years old to enter. How many kids misbehave and are within this range? Not many. Kids also cry when they got bopped on the head, so all it takes is one smack, and Timmy's crying on the floor. How boring! You're better off making another WWE ring rather than a place solely for 7 year olds to hit each other once. I don't know if it'll hinder the economy, but it surely won't help it. Conclusion: 7 year olds aren't entertaining to watch, really. And allowing them to hit others only teaches them that you should hit others. What are your thoughts?