There is no free will.

It has been quite a long time since I am doing a new debate topic again. It would be unfair if I refute Pro's argument. ===========FRAMEWORK===========Free will is not a common topic of discussion. Free will is not only a possibility but an actuality. Here, I will build my case up. I=Randomness in the world: P 1: If there is no randomness, then there isn’t free will. P 2: Randomness is possible. C: Therefore, free will is possible. Premise 1 is just a very general statement which can either be true or false. Determinist states that free will does not exist because everything is determined. Randomness is completely incompatible with determinism. Premise 2 is the one needs defence which I will do now. There is so much randomness in this world.1. The radioactive particle decays at unpredictable time. implies random. ***P(t) = e^{-t/(\gamma \tau)} \, *** (1)Radioactivity decay is a process where a radioactive atom decreases its energy and mass to become more stable by emitting lots of radiation to the surrounding. The decay will continue until it reaches a point where it becomes a stable atom. Radioactivity decay can happen spontaneously or induce by the collision with a free neutron. We can predict its mean lifetime through τ using the formula as shown above but we can’t know completely which is going to decay at first. So, in short, we can know that the average decay time like Z boson which has an average of decay time of 10^-25 seconds. So, we can see that we cannot predict which atom is going to decay first. This has clearly and inevitably shown that there is randomness in this world. 2. Heisenberg’s Quantum Mechanical Uncertainty Principle. means it is not determined. In other words, it is out of control. Uncertainty Principle is developed by Werner Heisenberg and its conceptual idea is that momentum before the observation of a particle is intrinsically uncertain. The time, energy and position remain unknown and can only be calculated only by probability. \Delta x\cdot\Delta p_x \geqslant \frac{\hbar}{2} X is position of an atom whereas p is momentum. ***Heisenberg gave, as an illustration, the measurement of the position and momentum of an electron using a photon of light. In measuring the electron's position, the higher the frequency of the photon the more accurate is the measurement of the position of the impact, but the greater is the disturbance of the electron, which absorbs a random amount of energy, rendering the measurement obtained of its momentum increasingly uncertain (momentum is velocity multiplied by mass), for one is necessarily measuring its post-impact disturbed momentum, from the collision products, not its original momentum. With a photon of lower frequency the disturbance – hence uncertainty – in the momentum is less, but so is the accuracy of the measurement of the position of the impact. *** (2)To illustrate this for further understanding: 3. Quantum Fluctuations is the sudden change in the number of energy in space. *** That means that conservation of energy can appear to be violated, but only for small values of t (time). This allows the creation of particle-antiparticle pairs of virtual particles. The effects of these particles are measurable, for example, in the effective charge of the electron, different from its "naked" charge. ***(3)All that means that the not known events can affect the outcome. As the above defences stand, the conclusion follows. II=Ability to do.1. Ought to choose. implies something we can. Like ought to eat, drink and sleep. Do note that when I talk about free will, it does not encompass maximal autonomy. My opponent might claim that why can’t we choose GENES, PAST, PLACE OF BIRTH and so on. They are being grouped under the maximal anatomy. Fee will does not include that at all. For example, if we are given A or B gift to have. We can choose to either to have A or B. if we can't make any choices, then determinism is true. But now we can see that we can make choices through our mind and we have right to choose whichever we like. This has proven free will. Making the right or wrong choice is another case. ***The "Ought implies Can" (OIC) thesis establishes a link between obligations and abilities. It is associated with Kant, but the Kantian attribution is debated. Its main interpretation goes along the latin motto "ad impossibilia nemo tenetur" and allows you to discharge an obligation when you lack the possibility to do what is commanded. Others interpret it as saying that, given the fact that you have the relevant "Can", there is no way not to do what you Ought to. ***(4)2. To think or not to think. ***Rand argued that the primary focus of man's free will is in the choice: 'to think or not to think'. "Thinking is not an automatic function. In any hour and issue of his life, man is free to think or to evade that effort. Thinking requires a state of full, focused awareness. The act of focusing one's consciousness is volitional. Man can focus his mind to a full, active, purposefully directed awareness of reality—or he can unfocused it and let himself drift in a semiconscious daze, merely reacting to any chance stimulus of the immediate moment, at the mercy of his undirected sensory-perceptual mechanism and of any random, associational connections it might happen to make. "[50] According to Rand, therefore, possessing free will, human beings must choose their values: one does not automatically hold one's own life as his ultimate value. Whether in fact a person's actions promote and fulfil his own life or not is a question of fact, as it is with all other organisms, but whether a person will act to promote his well-being is up to him, not hard-wired into his physiology. "Man has the power to act as his own destroyer—and that is the way he has acted through most of his history *** (5)To summarize this, we can manipulate the level of focusing like to think about important subject matter. We can choose not think about anything using our mind. The ability to change the level of focusing is important to us. Likewise, we are free to focus on some jokes or just lose focus on it if we find our stomach is aching. As an example, we can think about the same jokes over and over again. Or, we can choose to forget about it. The conscious mind is important for human’s use. . ’. III= Responsibility. ***Responsibility is defined as the state or fact of having a duty to deal with something or of having control over someone. *** (6)It (Responsibility) can also be narrowed down to the burden that someone is given in order to do something. All of us are responsible for our actions. Then, it must be cause by something that is free will. We are free to take actions that we think is rational and wish for. For example, I have organised some special functions like party, meeting, conference, marching and so on. The moment when you ask who is responsible for that particular event, it would definitely be me. I am responsible for the outcome of the event that I planned. The outcome can either be a roaring success or a terrible failure. You all might wonder what if our outcome is totally determined by chance. Then why shall me or must we fell responsible for them. There is at least an alternative way that we can take. Therefore we are responsible for its outcome. Moral responsibility comes from responsibility but responsibility does not really come from moral responsibility. Hence, responsibility is caused by free will. Responsibility is more or less connected to free will through the example that I have shown above. The ways we take will affect our result. If we take A way, then the result will be Z. If we take B way, the result will be different. We, again, are free to take any path. Good or bad is another matter. The ways that we take comes from the mind. Over to Pro. (1) . http://en.wikipedia.org...(2)http://en.wikipedia.org...(3) . http://en.wikipedia.org...(4) . http://philpapers.org... (5) . http://en.wikipedia.org...(Ayn_Rand)(6)https://www.google.com...?q=responsibility+meaning&oq=responsibilirt+neabibg&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3.7378j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8