Evolution is not a proven fact.

I specifically asked for SCIENTIFIC evidence for evolution. My opponent has offered none. He didn't even provide any sources. Well. Here's my evidence. (1) "Darwin experimented with birds, and lots of scientists today have spent decades doing observational science by breeding fruit flies, and other kinds of animals. Yet all the results have shown that it is not possible to break the DNA code barrier and create a new kind of animal. After breading fruit flies for over 100 years: Some get larger, Some get smaller, Some get weaker, Some get stronger, Some change color, But all are still fruit flies. The typical size of a fruit fly is 1/8 inch and you may get a fly as large as 1/4 inch but you will never get one that is the size of a horse. This is because the DNA code barrier prevents anything more than superficial changes. Even if you did get a 1/4 inch fruit fly and left it in its natural environment the population will revert back to its normal size within a few generations. Un-natural selection (human intervention) can accentuate many different characteristics, but that selection is limited to the genetic information that already exists. If your container full of DNA does not contain the information to create feathers, then you and all of your descendants will never have feathers. No amount of selection can create new genetic information." After all the decades of breeding by scientists, there has never been a new kind of life created. So, if scientists can't breed new kinds of life, what makes anyone thing that it can happen naturally? (2) "The Myth of Beneficial Mutations Mutation occurs at a rate of one for every ten million cell duplications. This is an insignificant number when compared to 100 trillion cells in a human body. Thus, the chance of having a couple of cells with a mutated form for every gene is possible without any noticeable effect. The reproduction system is a simple and powerful information system within the DNA molecule and it is a very stable system for transmitting that information. Mutations are very rare. Researchers have by means of genetic breeding, changed a two-wing fruit fly into a four-wing fruit fly. The four-wing fruit fly consistently reproduces four-winged fruit flies. But although a new species has been produced, it is not a new "kind." The mutant fruit fly is still a fruit fly. As a matter of fact, the four-winged fruit fly is a weakened form. The second set of wings do not help the fruit fly; they actually get in the way. Its ability to take flight is dangerously hindered. Having been selectively bred in the laboratory, this species will also not survive without the caring assistance of researchers. This is a poor example of evolution by mutation. The bottom line is that mutations always weaken an organism and never change it into something else. The fruit fly remains a fruit fly. Beneficial Mutations Sickle Cell Anemia is often presented as an example of a favorable mutation. This is because red blood cells carry a sickle cell hemoglobin mutation that resists malaria. Although it resists malaria, 25 percent of those who have this mutant gene can still get the disease. Many have a hard time calling this a beneficial mutation when it brings with it a 25 percent chance of death. Sickle cell anemia causes a sickle shape hemoglobin molecule that bonds to another producing an enlarged molecular structure that cannot pass through the capillary walls. This condition occurs when the oxygen supply is low. How can a diseased hemoglobin molecule that was processed with incorrect information in the DNA be called a benefit to any body? This defect itself can kill a person. No New Information A basic information principle must be violated for evolution to be true. For an organism to evolve upward from simple to complex there must be an increase of genetic information. When mutations take place, however, there is an exchange of information or misinformation, but never an increase. The system is limited to what it has and therefore cannot create new codes. Most frequently, information exchange leads to a loss of information. - See more at: http://www.creationstudies.org... " There are two things you must realize about mutations. There are few, if any beneficial mutations, and mutations do not add new information. These are observable scientific facts, and directly contradict the theory of evolution. (1) http://sixdays.org... (2) http://www.creationstudies.org...