Liberal Progressives and Radical Feminist are attempting to emasculate men and destroy masculinity.

Alright, First and foremost we will look at the claims you make in your first argument. Your very first statement says "Since the Feminist revolution of the 60's men have been thrown around." Let's look to see if this is true. In 2003, only 15.2 percent of parliaments worldwide were women. Only 12 women were head of state out of 192 countries. Women make up over 70% of the worlds 1.3 billion who live on less than a dollar a day. In Europe, women who do well for themselves and work their way up the ladder of success find their wages farther and farther from men. With the top 10% making an average of 35% less than men in their respective fields. Yes, men have definitely been "thrown around" lately. You say that in education classrooms are geared towards females, yet when we look at lower education, like that of kindergarten and elementary schools, teachers have been found to call on a male student more than they would call on a female student. In places of higher education, it isn't female oriented, rather we are seeing a trend of gender neutralization. It isn't that men are being demasculated, it is that gender is no longer important. The words you are using in your arguments is the very rhetoric that is being used against you. "Men and boys are constantly degraded for the masculinty." Really? When, where, how? I didn't know this existed. Rather, boys are given toy guns for Christmas, and GI Joes, and toys that are extremely masculine. "Boys are taught that aggressiveness and competition are bad." Once again. No. If anything, girls are being taught it is good. The whole feminist movement is about placing men on a lower level, it's about getting both genders on the same level. And yes, girls are taught that a man must not hit them. To say it is ok is absurd. I seriously hope that you aren't advocating abuse. And no, girls are not taught that it is ok to kick a guy in the testes. Rather, girls are by nature more peaceful. Therefore, by nature they would choose not to do that. But also, with the increase in sex education in public schools, girls are taught what could happen to the testes if hit with enough force. Last I checked, it still takes to multiply. Girls know this, and won't do it without good reason. And if there is good reason, then I feel they should be able to kick a man there. Another reason men are not supposed to hit women, is that men are naturally stronger than women. To say otherwise goes against multiple observations. Men can hit harder than women. You say that we live in a society that worships women. You give the example of television. Last I checked, there were no women on the UFC circuit. And ultimate fighting is extremely masculine. Men, and boys around the nation idolize these men. They certainly aren't portrayed as week or helpless. And women are definitely not worshipped through our media. One of the most degrading things in my opinion is how our media dresses up women, by dressing them down. When our media tries to sell a product by showing scantily clad women, they are reinforcing this notion of women being nothing more than an item of which they can use to attract men. They are appealing to our sex appeal by saying "this extremely beautiful woman is nothing more than a product used to attract you." It reaffirms our subliminal idea of women being good for nothing but sex. And I didn't know that women were the CEO's and Secret Agents now. What about Jason Bourne? In the hit comedy "The Office" the president is male. "Chuck" another comedy has two male secret agents, and only one female. The only show I can think of with the main secret agent being a female is Alias. Lost the hit drama has the main character male. All of the CSI's have a male authority figure. The other crime dramas such as Criminal Intent, Criminal Minds, Cold Case, etc. have males as the leading roles. Scrubs has many more male characters than female characters. And the female doctor is portrayed as emotional, and somewhat unstable. As for women in debate, male participants are much more likely to win a round compared to a female. Now for my arguments. Liberal Progressives and Radical Feminists are attemting to EQUALIZE masculinity with femininity. The whole movement is based on bringing one down, it's about equalizing both. Studies also show that more men tend to be less masculine then they would like you to believe. Society right now actually says that a man must be tough. He should be the main breadwinner, but not necessarily the only breadwinner. He should be the one to fix the car, and do manly things around the house. He should be tough, and not reveal his feelings. A man who cries is weird, and soft. Our picture for the ideal patriot is a man. Our ideal politician is a man because he symbolizes power, strength, justice, fairness, the ability to make decisions quickly, confidence, and a myriad of other things. A woman doesn't even enter into the picture. Just look at how many women are in our government now. How many women Supreme Court Justices are there? How many men in our government? How men men Supreme Court Justices? All of these things prove specifically that what you are saying is simply not happening. And once again, they aren't trying to demasculate men, they are just trying for equality.