JK Rowling's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was plagiarized from Willy the Wizard

You also argue that Peter Jackson, JJ Abrams, current Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Newt Gingrich, professors of College and doctors are backing up your statements. The truth that Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich are full lies, so who knows they are speaking the truth (3)(4). In my opponent's second statement says "Writing 44 parts between two or more stories can be a coincidence. One example is between "Alice in Wonderland" and "Spirited Away" where two of the stories where a young female protagonist, goes to a parallel world and tries to find a way home. With Alice and Wonderland and Spirited Away with a lot of similarities (look at my second argument's You Tube video) it is possible that JK Rowling a lot of the same ideas from Willy the Wizard or any other novels without realizing it. We have to remember, there are more than a million stories in the world and one new story can have the same of many ideas from any of one of the million stories. Also, "ideas" are not protected by copyrights. " I still say that having 44 similarities cannot be a coincidence. You wrote that between "Alice in Wonderland" and "Spirited Away" have a lot of similarities, well Hayao Miyazaki got permission from Alice and Wonderland and Rowling didn't. The way to tell is that Spirited Away is not being sued, and Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" is being sued. My opponent also wrote: "You wrote that your side is solid all because of three lawyers and an entire law firm says so. Well Rowling, Bloomsbury and Scholastic Inc. has lawyers too and this will be the case of lawyers vs. lawyers. Rowling has lawyers and wants to dismiss the case. So in this lawyer battle, it is about being smart vs. being smarter. " Well a judge rule that the case will not be dismissed (5) and this proves that Paul Allen and Willy the Wizard's lawyers are smarter than Rowling's and Harry Potter lawyers. Justice David Kitchen says that Jacobs' estate Paul Allen had a chance of success (5) and this is looking can go Allen's way. My opponent wrote: "One of the claims is that both books are based on a boy wizard, competing in competitions. A boy as a protagonist is not rare to novels and other fiction. Pokemon has a boy as Ash Ketchum as the main protagonist and there are very more examples of boy as the protagonist. Wizards are also common to the novel and fiction world and international competition are also common to the story and fictional world. Competitions are also common in real life such as the Olympics, World Cup, sports, game shows and etc. Combining all three ideas can happen. " Three ideas can happen on there own but 44 ideas cannot. Although wizard are common to the fiction world, it his how two stories can be written in a similarly way that deifies how big of an issue that Mrs. Rowling violated the copyrights of Willy the Wizard. There are 44 similarities, not just three. There are a lot of ways that Rowling plagiarized from Willy the Wizard (6) since there are so many similarities between the two books (7). (1). http://www.ventrice.com... (2). http://www.answers.org... (3). http://www.hyscience.com... (4). http://irritableliberal.blogspot.com... (5). http://www.nzherald.co.nz... (6). http://www.copyright.gov... (7). http://www.scribd.com...