Who Would Make a Better Husband for YYW

A personal message to Thett (see the first video). http://www.youtube.com...I also have a message for my beloved, YYW (see the second video). http://www.youtube.com...I will analyze firstly what makes a successful relationship, and then why YYW and I would (obviously) be more successful than YYW and Thett3. Specifically, I will look at three key things: (1) Sex, (2) Personality, and (3) Interests. I will then rebut Con's highly fallacious case, but will expand on my points in the next round.Before I continue, however, I must point out that due to my utter disdain for Thett3, I cannot bear to type his name. I shall henceforth refer to him only as "Texan." PRO's CASESEX, SEX, and...MORE SEX!Romantic relationships cannot escape the need for sex. Couples that don't enjoy or engage in sex will usually fail, and I think, knowing YYW as I do (which is clearly much better than Texan) that he would definitely not enjoy a marriage with poor sexual prospects.Indeed, "a good sex life is an important part of an individual's overall health...People who have a good sex life feel better [mentally and physically]." [1] " Sex is an integral part of any marriage because it ensures the healthy expression of love between two people who plan on being together for the rest of their lives." [2]So, we have established that sex is important to any successful relationship or marriage. The next logical question is "what makes good sex?" Askmen had some answers [3], and, as a gay man, I would say that many of these traits also apply in homosexual relationships. These qualities include: cleanliness, giving great orals, trying new things, and being physically appealing.Frankly, gay men--at least in my experience--are far cleaner (and better dressed) than straight men. I know that applies to me. There is no way in hell that any straight guy is going to spend what I spend or take the time I take to look good. As far as orals are concerned, I doubt the Texan has had any man-to-man experience on this. Practice makes perfect, and I have had a lot more practice ;) Trying new things--really, I doubt the Texan would want to do half the stuff I would love to try (or have tried.) I am much more likely to be adventurous in the bedroom, and YYW would be free to...experiment...in many different ways.As far as physical appearance go, YYW knows what I look like, and it fits his type fairly well. I also know what he looks like, and...I'm going to...have to change the topic...before my libido goes through the roof...I think it is crucial to remind everyone that the Texan is HETEROSEXUAL. While this should be fairly straightforward, it is defined for clarity's sake as "sexually attracted to people of the opposite sex." [4] Therefore, by stipulating that he is heterosexual, the Texan acknowledges that he CANNOT be attracted to the great YYW. I don't think YYW wants to be married to someone who isn't going to want or enjoy him; that could be like humping a piece of furniture--the Texan would be completely uninterested. Consider that most adults have sex 61 times a year--the Texan would want a lot less than that, but I'd certainly be fine with doing more ;) [1]The Texan is also way too short to fit YYW's standards, as he expressed them to me. I fit within his height preferences, build preferences, and so on.PERSONALITYWhat type of personalities make good long-term matches? Do opposites attract, or do bird of a feather really make the best couples?A recent study provides some insight. "Researchers say those results dispute the 'opposites attract' rule and suggest that humans use a 'likes attract' rule when finding a long-term mate." [5] The Texan even seems to concur with this when he suggests that two Slytherins (Houses are based largely on personality) would make better partners than, say, a Slytherin and a Ravenclaw. On this personality test, both YYW and I got the same result: Dumbledore. [6]On this personality test, we both got the same result: Bree. [7]On this political beliefs test, we both got the exact same result as well. [8]For that last one, there tends to be a high correlation between personality and political ideology. [9] So, clearly, YYW and I have similar personalities which means that we'd be more likely coexist and get along better.INTERESTSSharing interests is important in any marriage. Clearly, if you're going to spend your lives together, you need things that you want to do with one another.YYW and I share many interests, not the least of which is debate. We're both political junkies, Harry Potter fans, philosophy enthusiasts, sesquipedalian writers, Lorde and Daft Punk listeners, foodies, and more. These shared interests would help us find common ground in our very successful marriage.CON's CASEC1Con is assuming that if he and YYW marry, Texas will allow gay marriage. This is wrong because they could easily marry out of state.Moreover, the source the Texan is citing was written before the Supreme Court case striking down DOMA, which has helped form the basis of numerous successful legal challenges to gay marriage bans. The results of this court case have helped speed up the movement towards marriage equality, including in Texas, where a judge recently struck down the state's ban on marriage equality. [10] Moreover, Con's article is focused not on court cases, but on ballot initiatives--so it fails to take into account the full panoply of options available to push for gay marriage.Finally, Con's article states, "It’s also possible, of course, that the Supreme Court decision could somehow kick-start public support for same-sex marriage, causing it to accelerate faster, or that the recent spate of Democratic and Republican politicians coming out in favor of it could do so. But one no longer needs to make optimistic assumptions to conclude that same-sex marriage supporters will probably soon constitute a national majority." This highlights that marriage equality is likely to happen soon anyway, so YYW should choose his happiness over advancing the Rainbow Revolution.C2A cat with a bunch of idiotic cherubs? Pssshhh. YYW's is a big, fluffy dog person, and should vote down the cat on principle.Besides, Gunian (Whoopi Goldberg) is pretty awesome. Anyone who hates Billy O'Reilly that much, and can tell some pretty damn funny jokes, is kick-a$$ enough to vote for. Her smile is also pretty snide, and YYW loves making snide remarks, so he should totally pick my profile picture.As for names, this is clear Pro ballot. My name is easily pronounced as "B-S-H-One" or, alternatively, as "bish" or "bash." The Texan points out that having multiple pronunciations is beneficial--well, this is clearly non-unique offense. Also, Con's point that my name in unpronounceable is moot, as I just illustrated. 1 is also indicative of first place, or the highest seed, etc. Clearly, first place trumps 3rd place. Q.E.D.Finally, I don't know why YYW would ever vote on a paradigm put forth by someone names LaissezFaire. Clearly, YYW straddles the line between a liberal and a statist, and would reject, prime facie, such an idea as libertarian claptrap. C3A. God-like PowersIn fact, the Texan is just a petty magician using low-down mind tricks to win. I can also do much of that. For example, as you read this sentence, you will think of a cat. You will now think of cherubs. You will now envisage them burning in a pit of fire. Viola, I too have these powers.What the Texan does not realize is that I am God. I revealed my true nature to the Muppets--as evidence, I submit that the Muppets, in a real-life documentary, identified me as God. [11]Also, I am an El-Aurian, and as such have mystical abilities such as foresight, that will make me even more powerful than the Texan! [12]B. HotnessI already addressed this. Moreover, everyone knows Royal and the Texan are lovers, and she is naturally motivated to make him sound better than he really is. Clearly, she is a biased source, and totally untrustworthy.C. SlytherinYYW is a Gryffendor! He should reject Slytherin completely! There has never been a successful relationship between Slytherin and Gryffendor, but there has been Ravenclaw and Gryffendor (e.g. Luna and Nevil.) As a Ravenclaw, I am the better choice.Also, this shows how little about YYW the Texan really knows!D. OlderCon and YYW have only just begun talking, and so he has no advantage over me in the length of his relationship with YYW. [13] Moreover, what Con is saying is that he's old and stale...DDO's history.C4I don't think YYW wants to be a Republican, nor do I think he really wants to run for office.C5Con is contradicting himself. He says YYW should pick him for being Republican (less accepting of homosexuality), whereas YYW should reject me for being a baptized, but non-practicing, Catholic (less accepting of homosexuality.) I am also willing to convert for my love. SOURCES1 - http://health.howstuffworks.com...2 - http://voices.yahoo.com...3 - http://www.askmen.com...4 - http://www.merriam-webster.com...5 - http://www.webmd.com...6 - http://www.zimbio.com...7 - http://www.brainfall.com...8 - http://www.theadvocates.org...9 - http://www.sciencedaily.com...10 - http://www.latimes.com...11 - http://www.austinchronicle.com...12 - http://en.memory-alpha.org...13 - http://www.debate.org...YYW - I love you!