Neo-Nazis are morons who are ignorant of who the real Nazis were

"Neo-Nazism consists of post-World War II social or political movements seeking to revive Nazism.[1][2][3][4] The term neo-Nazism can also refer to the ideology of these movements."My opponent ignores the fact that neo-Nazism is a post-WWII global movement seeking to revive Nazism. Neo-Nazis are a minority within the U.S, but a majority in Greece and other countries formerly known as the Eastern Bloc for communism. It is important to note that the U.S 'National Socialist Movement' shares similar characteristic, that both parties are known to harass, attack, torment people of different ideological or religious opinions--Hitler in the 'Beer Hall Putsch', National Socialist Movement (NSM) in Toledo Riot (2005).What I am talking about is not Nazi parties existing today in many Southern and Eastern European countries, and in England. Those people are educated and very briliant, and in many cases arrogant, though quite understandable. I'm talking about a group more similar to the KKK: a group that assembles and does speeches. In this case I'm talking things such as gangs, prison gangs, skinheads. The neo-Nazis, as skinheads, arguably did not come until the mid-1960s, in America, which perhaps not coincidently, started mixing up the Klan with the Nazis, though confusing many of these kids.While Hitler can claim that he's against imperialism, but when he's annexing territories (Austria, Czech) just over several months, compounding with the fact that he overstepped his boundaries in militarizing French Rhineland, it's not wrongful to call him a hypocrite either. Yes, their behaviors are like that of a teenager with a severe case of anxiety, but isn't that the essence of a Nazism with all its unpleasant implications? Moreover, when a movement is as influential as neo-Nazism, it's unfair to call the people behind it mere "wannabe punk high school drop outs". It's just what they believe in. A more suitable term would be "organized agitators".Austria chose to join Germany. As a matter of fact, Hitler was Austrian. Militarizing the Rhine area doesn't make it imperialism. Imperialism involves conquering countries for the sole purpose of looting, as Denmark did to Greenland and Britain did to Ireland and its many other colonies. Germany didn't do those things. So no it's not the same. As for your comment about the behaviors of teenagers, no that is not the essence of true Nazism. Nazism was brilliant. Hitler and Himler were actually calm and quite ruthless. They did not display the annoying buffoonery of skinheads.>Two, the liberals (mostly butt-hurt liberals) have been rewriting history to make it seem that the KKK and Nazis believed in the same thing, when they clearly weren't at all.KKK and Nazism: essentially the same thing, just in different countries.Here's a piece of info that shows that not only Nazism but Germany society was different from the Klan, taken from http://en.wikipedia.org..."These views were echoed in the works of Dutch, French and German [that's not a typo, it says German] authors. Nicolaus Hieronymus Gundling proposed that the exotic appearance and cannibalism of the Scottish people made them akin to the savages of Madagascar. Even as late as the mid-18th century, German authors likened Scotland and its ancient population to the exotic tribes of the South Seas.[13] With the close political ties of the Franco-Scottish alliance in the late Medieval period, before William Shakespeare's Macbeth, English Elizabethan theatre dramatised the Scots and Scottish culture as comical, alien, dangerous and an uncivilised. In comparison to the manner of Frenchmen who spoke a form of English,[14] Scots were used in material for comedies; including Robert Greene's James IV in a fictitious English invasion of Scotland satirizing the long Medieval wars with Scotland. English fears and prejudices were deeply rooted, drawing on stereotypes as seen in Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles and politically edged material such as George Chapman's Eastward Hoe in 1605, offended King James with its anti-Scottish satire, resulting in the imprisonment of the playwright.[15] Despite this, the play was never banned or suppressed. Authors such as Claude Jordan de Colombier in 1697 plagiarised earlier works,[16] Counter-reformation propaganda associated the Scots and particularly Highland Gaelic-speakers as barbarians from the north[17] who wore nothing but animal skins. Confirming old stereotypes relating back to Roman and Greek philosophers in the idea that "dark forces" from northern Europe (soldiers from Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, France and Scotland) acquired a reputation as fierce warriors.[18][19][20] With Lowland soldiers along the North Sea and Baltic Sea, as well as Highland mercenaries wearing the distinctive Scottish kilt, became synonymous with that of wild, rough and fierce fighting men."German society was anti-Nordic and they were the ones who founded the Nazis. They were no the same at all.