AMD is a better choice for home PC's and laptops than intel

"By which point of view does an AMD "doesn't work as well" when processing word documents and using the internet maybe even if with 7 internet connections? "Word Documents are an example, not the whole case. With 7 internet connections, at US average (which we are below,) we'd be each getting only 1.05 MBps. This doesn't include other connections. Remember that not everyone can afford to pay for a strong connection every month. "At home, having 7 internet connections. .. how does that concern with individual computers having individual processors? Client/Server network is not a concern of this debate, Con. "Everything is relevant when discussing which Processor is better. The Pro wants to focus only on the Processor, but when deciding which chip to use, many things become relevant to the decision. "Intel processors which are made for that purpose (Xeon) cost $ 1500 at the lowest. .. "The Pro assumes everyone buys their processors separately from the Computer. All processing is done through the Computers chip-set. There are three parts to a connection, and all three require fast processing. If the Computer (IGA_012-HP here) can't process fast enough, it'll drag the computers overall connection speed down. We don't need an expansive Intel chip for this, but we do need a fast chip. "I would like to share that I live in a metro which has complex network systems with so large a population accessing the net. Here, I access all at one go, high speed LAN, WI-FI, Broadband"The US population using the internet is nearly twice India's. With 81% of Americans using the Internet, only 12.6% of Indian's using the Internet. The Pro never mentions what AMD chip he uses or how many MBps he's using. He himself may very well be Overclocking a $1000 chip with a massive Internet Connection. The Pro only had one chance to list these off. Without all the details, we must assume the Pro might be nitpicking the details, talking about how good his computer is, but without providing the information we need to fully compare his with the average person, and concluding whether or not his own Home Computer is a true reflection of the average computer in India, or in the World. "Does it? Dear con, please elaborate the meaning of the above sentence. Many different connections. .. "Again listing off his own experience as that of the rest of India. Let me explain in more detail. .. List of Internet Connecting Devices:7 Computers2 Game Systems2 TVs4 Phones2 CarsDoes that reflect the Average American? No, which is okay, because my emphases is on the fact that everyone's situation is different, and what Chip works best for one Home Computer, doesn't work as well for another. I have AMD, and experience lag a lot. Earlier, I spent half an hour trying to fix the lag on my Internet Browsers. "Just take it in, does a tablet have awesome processors like Intel or AMD? Nope. .. "If a tablet doesn't use either the Chips in question, it's irrelevant. "My friend having a new i5 used to boast. .. one day I went to his house. .. and opened my FB account, guess what I saw when I opened the Task manager? 85-95 % of CPU usage. "Again failing to represent the whole case. What else was on the computer? Virus's, background programs, a computer that hasn't been cleaned in over a year? The Pro only nitpicks the details he wants, and leaves out the rest. This proves that his MBps situation is different than his friends. Even a $1500 Intel Chip would be ran down by a badly kept computer. Do you have the same programs and upkeep? one computer with 2.5 GHz on a cleaned up new computer runs better than a 3.5 GHz processor on a dirty computer with virus's and a year's worth of programs in the background. Trust me here. .. An i5 Processor won't lag on one internet page. Everyone knows that. .. Just one page? There is more to the story, much more. Anyone with computer-knowledge can tell that the details have been nitpicked. "Go to the above link and read the reviews. "wow is the word" named review will give you the insight of the kind of multitasking and AMD is capable of over an Intel. "A link, on the last round? Multitasking is nice, but it doesn't boost speed. If anything, it lowers speed slightly. Overall, you only need a lot of multitasking if you want a high-end computer. Many people aren't looking for that. Also, your site is a store. They are not going to talk bad about their appliance. The site will talk up the value of their product and make everything sound good. Besides, the Intel i5 gets better CPU while the AMD APU Quad Core A8 gets better GPU. Again reinforcing my conclusion that which ever chip is better depends on the Computer and it's purpose. "What I meant to say is that when People like to mingle with the specs, they will choose AMD cause it gives them the freedom. "The word of importance here. .. "When. " They prefer the AMD when they want to overclock. What if they (the majority) don't want to overclock? Again reinforcing my statement that the best Chip depends on the buyer's wants and needs. "AMD tears huge piles, sure. Intel is faster bit by bit, is also right but please agree on the fact that bit by bit quickness is never required in the tasks that an average person does at home. "I'll agree with everything but the 'average person' part. Believe it or not, but the average person wants an Xbox 360 or PS3 for gaming, not a PC. The average PC buyer is still looking more for Internet Access, Connectivity, and download-heavy programs like Skype. "Ad Hominem. have you visited our country or do you research on our country? "Not Ad Hominem. I'm not attacking you rather than your argument. I'm bringing up that in your country, things are different. It's a very logical case. I must ask if you have visited my country to do research? If not, than your argument is unwarranted. "We too keep on accessing the net with various sources Wifi,LAN,broadband etc. .. "Again not being specific. How many MBps do you have? What AMD chip are you using? The Pro was to prove that in every case, AMD was better, while I was to prove that every case is too different for one Chip-set to be the all around best. Clearly he has only supported that his situation and mine are very different. Therefore supporting that our needs, and overall what Chip we need, is different. "Money for job, a scale not followed by Intel. "Yes, it does cost $163. The cost may effect whether or not it's more economic, but not whether or not it's best for the buyer's wants. Some people want gaming, so want savings, some want Internet and Connectivity. The Low-End processor lags? Amazing. It can't do what a High-End processor can? Even more amazing. The Pro continues to forget that only Computer hobbyist and enthusiasts will buy a Processor separate. The rest of this is irrelevant to the Resolution. "so, why do cheap phones easily play you-tube videos and stream through FB? "You mean $199+ phones that don't process the same amount of data as a PC? I conclude that the Pro never proved that in every situation, an AMD is best. He even admitted in his conclusion that most people, not all though, just want entertainment, which is still false. Most younger people just want entertainment. Many people still want Skype, Connectivity, and Internet Browsing. As this debate as proven, everybody clearly has different needs, different situations, different MBps and number of objects connecting to the Internet. .. Neither AMD or Intel is the best choice for every case. The Pro needs AMD, while I need Intel. Not everyone wants to use the PC for Gaming, and many don't want to buy Processors separately. I conclude that the best chips depends on too many personal factors for AMD to match each. Everyone needs something different. With faster Intel Chips, and AMD chips with larger workloads, Intel with better CPU, and AMD with better GPU, the one that best is dependent on the user's needs and wants. Overall, across all the World, AMD is not always the better choice for PCs and Laptops than Intel. Thank you.