9/11 was an inside job

In actual fact, i think most people are aware that there was more than two buildings that fell that day, so i think this is the first fallacy to be assumptious and assume what others know. However, after many discussions and debates with 9/11 truthers, i can tell you for a fact that many of those truthers are completely unaware that WTC1, 2 and 7, where not the only buildings to fall that day. Such as WTC3, which was virtually cut in half by the fall of the first tower, then almost completely dismantled by the fall of the second tower. Then we had WTC5 which was almost ready to collapse after emmense fire swept through it and we can see pictures on the internet that prove the steel beems were bending and close to breaking. Also emmense damage to WTC6, yet truthers only ever talk about WTC7, and i can assure you that the footage used by the architects of the 9/11 truth movement such as Loose Change, is very fraudulent and deceptive and not honest at-all. For starters, they only ever show the collapse from oneside. The reason they never show the collapse from the otherside is because if they did then the viewer would be able to see the full scale of the fires. Another highly deceptive tactic used when showing the collapse, is that the truthers do not show the full footage, they cut out the beginning of the video, which clearly shows the East Penthouse on the roof of WTC7 collapsing into the building quite a few seconds before the actual building itself collapses. So what actually happens is that the Penthouse falls onto the already severely weakened floors beneath and they are unable to hold the weight of the Penthouse and so the house of cards begins to tumble. And also, the building only hits freefall speed for 2.5 seconds and it clearly begins to slow as it gets nearer to the ground. Also, nobody has ever said that a plane hit WTC7. No plane hit WTC3, 5 or 6 either and they were also engulfed in fires after being hit by debri and were close to suffering the same fate. So yes, there is an explanation to how it fell. It was hit by debree from two falling sky scrapers which did not fall straight down on it's footprint and parts of the building were still standing after 25 seconds, and then fire engulfed WTC7, the sprinkler system was damaged and thus there was little water available to fight the flames which burned all day. Also, Larry Silverstein was completely misquoted. He does admit that he said "Pull it", but he was not referring to the building, but to the fire-fighters that were in there. Basically, he said "we had witnessed enough deaths that day already, and enough was enough, so i instructed the firefighters to get the hell out of there". He was reffering to the firefighting operation. Now, regarding your claims about "Architects, engineers and scientists saying that it was impossible, this has to be one of the most dishonest arguments i have ever heard. It is true, certain architects, engineers and scientists have said this, but nowhere near compaired to how many architects, engineers and scientists saying that it is possible, and happened. The other thing that people seem to forget when saying no steel building of this size has ever collapsed of fire before, is that, also, no steel building has ever had two boeing676's fly into them at over 500mph and then to have the debree from two skyscrapers fall ontop of them, either, before. (Proof for penthouse collapsing, between 5:45mins & 6mins on the video) (Proof that fire can melt steel, in regards to my WTC5 claim) The rest of my facts can be verified quite easy with a simple google search