Achilles vs Hercules

I would first like to address con's comment to i have clearly not read the Iliad. I have read the Iliad and is clearly states of Achilles leading His forces into battle against the Trojans. Now secondly, i have never read ANY mythological book claiming that Achilles is the son of Zues and proves Con didn,t read the section were i clearly wrote out Achilles parent. Since i have to repeat myself, Achilles proven parents are Thetis and Peleus. Thetis is the daughter of the Primvordal God of water( Nereus). This makes Achilles a demi-god. You then stated that that Poes shoots Paris and causing victory to the Achaeans, but if you read the Iliad you would know that the Trojan Horse indeed won the Greeks the war and the Trojan Horse because it allowed the Greeks to literally burn down all of Troy. The Trojan Horse was indeed the idea of Achilles. You then mention that Hercules has gone on many quest including the 12 labors, but what you fail to realize is the only reason that he was able to do these quest were because of his enormous strength not because of battle skills. You then state that Achilles wines moans and complained, but that has nothing to do with the argument at hand which is who would win in a swords fight. Although he did do the things you listed above, this does not exuse Achilles amazing battle skills and his inevitability. In you 1st bullet you say that Zues would just tell Hercules how to defeat Achilles, but this defines Zues's very law that gods aren't to affair in the aids of men. So he would not tell Hercules about Achilles heal.Also you later state in that same bullet that Zues would tell Hercules how to defeat Achilles because of the prophecy of him being over thrown. If you read the early Greek Mythology, he had a wife before Hera named Metis, and Metis holds the baby that would overthrow Zues, and that's the reason that he ate her. Hercules wouldn't commit attacks out of blood lust?!!? Hercules was very arrogant in Greek myths and would often kill people out of blind fits of rage! Achilles never left his heal untended and most certainly did not ATTACK out of blood lust.You stated that Achilles committed attacks out of blood lust, this is incorrect as he did acts out of blood lust but never just foolishly attacked somebody. Achilles did have powers as he was immortal from every part of his body except heal.This is a power. Although Hercules strength is much greater than Achilles his strength will do him no good if he doesn't know about Achilles ankle.Hercules wasn't trained but that didn't mean he didn't needed to be trained. As i stated earlier, the only reason Hercules was able to complete those task were because of STRENGTH not SKILL. Wrestling mortals was of course easy to him because of his tremendous strength.Then you state that Achillies couldn't do the labors of Hercules but this is only a assumption as he never tried to do the labors of Hercules. Just as Hercules has strength, Achilles has inevitability. What i would like to hear from Con is how Hercules strength would match against Achilles Ineventabillity. Also i dont hear any way Hercules would win in a sword fight. Also you never bother to bring up Hercules lack of weapon skill against a extremely skilled swordsman and strategist. Hercules would be easily defeated by Achilles. Achilles is more experienced, smarter, invulnerable. With all that said, i pass the table back to Con.