Homosexuality is Morally Wrong, Therefore Unjust, Gay Marriage must therefore be illegal.

I must say you spend a lot of time debating points which are immaterial. I concede the following points to be true: -Gary J. Gates is qualified to give an opinion. *This does not relate to how homosexuality is moral. -A favor is an approved consideration or attention *In which case, once again, makes it subjective. If I do not approve of homosexuals adopting children, I would not consider it a favor. This does not relate to how homosexuality is moral. -Over population is debatable, as many articles as you find in favor I can find against. It is not a fact. *This does not relate to how homosexuality is moral. Agreement does not constitute morality. Please do not seek to confuse. When Hitler was at the height of his power, his approval rating was well over 50%, somewhere between 80% and 90%. Do not debate this, this is a fact which you can look up, and is not the basis of this debate. The purpose for stating this fact is this: Hitler received well over 50% approval from the people of Germany. Yet we can agree, since I assume you are no Neo Nazi, that his actions were morally wrong. Would you argue that Hitler was morally right? Since the people of Germany obviously believed he was? No. Please do not attempt to confuse. Unfortunately morality is not subjective. Killing is immoral, no matter how you try to define killing. Abusing someone is immoral, no matter how you try to define abuse. Cheating is immoral, no matter how you try to define cheating. Donating to those less fortunate is moral, no matter how you define it. I could go on but this is enough to demonstrate the point. Encouraging the stagnation of your species is immoral. Encouraging the demise of your species is immoral as well. Homosexuality stagnates the growth of our species. Approving of it, is to approve of stagnation of your species, which is also immoral. Quite possibly you believe it is good and right to halter the development of the human race, perhaps you would like to encourage its stagnation? But I think you are a reasonable person. Again I must state. I do personally approve of homosexuality, I have homosexual family members, however it is recognized that approval from a citizen does not mean the law should justify it. Example: Man kills your mother. Your brother kills this man. You approve of your brother's action, he has avenged your mother. The law puts your brother in jail, he has killed a man. Here in lies the disconnect between man's Approval of Behavior, and the laws duty to act Justly. Do not respond to this example, you may not approve of your brother's actions, but many people will, and I am sure you are reasonable and can understand the point for more than the example. In closing, it was clever but noticed that you concluded by taking a statement of mine erroneously out of context. So I will rephrase it here. "All animals look to have their species continued, reproduction is how this is accomplished, thus reproduction is for a species betterment. Any part of a species which cannot contribute to its betterment, is morally wrong." Yes homosexuals pay taxes, as required by law of all citizens of the United States of America. This is not a matter of moral, but a matter of acting within the law. Many murderers, rapists, thieves, extortionists, all paid their taxes which helps to provide a better education, help social security, medicaid, medicare, military, government, and food stamps. Many criminals pay with money they got illegally. Should we forgive all who act immorally, on the grounds that it is okay as long as they pay their taxes? Please do not try to make this an emotional debate over whether taxes save the children. We know they do. That we are not debating. Show me that homosexuality does not do what I claim. Homosexuality "Halters the continuance of the human race." Please refute this point, if you cannot refute this point, you must accept Homosexuality is immoral, therefore unjust.