Biblical Creation or Creationism is false

Alchemy never was a science just to let you know ;) Alchemy was once science. It gave explanations, and they claimed knowledge. It’s the predecessor to chemistry. Check out heading “Relation to the science of chemistry” on wiki. http://bit.ly... testable conclusions off of them Testable? How do you test the big bang in a lab? "well science can be wrong and creation right". I don’t think all of science is wrong, I just don’t think that it is always right. Just because something has “science” labeled on it, doesn’t mean it’s true. Cold Fusion was a pretty hot topic in its days. Science is evidence, the conclusions we make in science are evidence based. Just because something has “evidence” doesn't necessary follow the conclusions are true. Le Verrier made Vulcan sound convincing. Why does the scientific community agree the earth is old? The secular community of which I think you’re talking about bases its assessment from the assumption of uniformitarism, which is impossible to prove. An axiom I don't agree with. you really think they all are teamed up to create an imaginary model (as you say) where Adam and Eve aren't real? Richard Lewontin put it. “…Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.". http://bit.ly... If creation is true then scientists would have found evidence for this. No that’s not necessary true, as it assumes that no scientist has, Biblical Creationist has the Bible, which gives account of creation (historical evidence), and they’re scientist. The evidence for a creator is all around you, from your body to the incredible design of our planet (truly remarkable how much order there is that lets the earth have vegetation, when all other known planets don’t). I will use the example of the multiple ice layers in the arctic Snow storms can deposit multiple layers that do look like annual layers, it is possible that a lot of those layers did come from snow storms. Some creationist thinkers thinks that there were a lot of evaporation that increased the moisture in the air from the hot water (ideally since the bible reads “fountains of the deep” in gen 7:11, the water was probably hot because it came from the earth’s interior) resulting in more snowfall in higher regions. You can read more on the subject at http://www.icr.org... http://bit.ly... If you seriously think I would take an objection to dating methods...no evidence and no backing by scientists you are out of your mind With similar reasoning if you seriously think I would accept an objection to creationism from uniformitarian based dating that have no backing from a YEC, you’re out of your mind. Young earth creationist (YEC) usually do peer review their own work with other YECs in creationist journals much like old earth scientist peer review with other old earth scientist in old earth journals (go figure!). faith is believing without evidence. You misunderstand faith. Faith is not “believing without evidence” that’s called baselessness, faith is believing in the evidence. How can you prove that what you see is real but just a figment of your imagination? You can’t, it’s impossible to get around solipsism for all this could be a dream. You have to have faith that what you see (the evidence) is real and not imagined. On evidence of creationism, we see that a body shows convincing signs of design, we don’t believe that the evidence for design is a figment of the imagination, but believe the evidence is real. Therefore creationism is not baseless, it has evidence. Please explain Neanderthals That’s a double loaded question there, for I disagree that Neanderthals were a different species. They buried their dead, used tools, had a complex social structure, employed language, and played musical instruments. Neanderthal anatomy differences are extremely minor and can be for the most part explained as a result of a genetically isolated people that lived a rigorous life in a harsh, cold climate. http://bit.ly...