Pascal's Wager is Infallible

I can tell you did not read the rule about argument size.. "This wager is incomplete because it ignores every other religion." No, it doesn't. It simply states that it is safer to be Theist than to not to be a Theist. "Thus it is very obvious that the best pick is Thor worship and the worst choice is Christian worship." No it's not, because Thor is as equally possible as God, only God has thousands of years worth of Religion and worshiping that makes his chances of existing slightly bigger. Therefore, it is safer to be a Theist and believe in something like the Christian God or the Catholic God. Now, i'm not exercising Ad Populus, i'm simply saying it's probably a wiser choice to beieve in a religion that has existied and had books written about it for thousands of years, than a God that you literally just thought of. "Now, when you include all the mutually exclusive belief systems that have existed, existed, or will exist in the future into the argument, you get a crazy grid and would need a supercomputer to calculate the best choice." True, but it is still safer to be Theist than Atheist, and that's as far as the Wager goes. "2) You falsely assume that there is no cost to Christianity. It wastes your time, promotes hate, and convinces people that their lives have no meaning since it is just a little finite thing compared to eternity." That's your false view of it. It does not waste time, except for around 2 minutes of praying everyday and maybe a few hours at church on sundays. Christianity does NOT promote hate AT ALL, that's just propaganda made up by the Media and hateful Atheist. It does not convince people about their lives having no meaning, because they DO, since God will judge every single one of us and our souls will live on forever. "3) You believe something because your burden of proof has been met, not because you choose to believe it. If God exists, he will know you were just faking it." Oh God..! I should've put "Rule #8- No Strawman". I NEVER, ever said I believed in God simply because of Pascal's Wager. I'm just saying it's an infallible argument and you are wrong to say it is. "The Bible is as much a "proof of Holy activity thousands of years ago" as a comic book is proof of Spider Man. You can point to things in the Bible that we can find, maybe a city or some historical facts, but comic books about Spider Man take place in New York, a real city and they include descriptions of historic events too. This is of course ridiculous and it is obvious that the fact that a book exists has nothing to do with whether the contents comport with reality, so your claim that the Bible itself counts as evidence of God is fallacious." But.. BUT, the Bible was written thousands of years ago and is actually meant to be taken seriously. We have Physical proof against the fact that the Spiderman comics are proof of a real Spiderman, because we actually KNOW the people who made it and they have admitted it's for entertainment purposes only. The Bible is simply a hint towards something Theists would believe in, many years ago, We might not know exactly when or what, but it's a hint- which means that it's slightly more possible that a serious, normally portrayed God/Gods exist. "Next, you said " It's makes more sense to send someone to Hell for disobeying or not believing than Vice Versa."If you really believe this quote, I am seriously concerned about your mental state. You think it is okay to torture someone forever." And you think it's okay to torture someone who worships you forever. I'm just saying that it seems a bit more realistic for someone who is BAD to get tortured forever, instead of someone who is Good."You additionally think that an appropriate reason to do this is because they didn't believe in a guy who is playing a never ending game of hide and seek and using his magic to hide all evidence that he ever existed. " So, now you're the one to judge, right? You're changing the subject. You went from trying to disprove Pascal's Wager to Insulting God's morals. You aren't following the rules I gave you.."Your God will torture me forever because I don't believe ridiculous stories with no evidence, but if Hitler believed those stories(and there is evidence he did), then he is in heaven. " Of course not, his horrible deeds are unforgivable and Hitler will never go to heaven for his terrible sins. You, however, could EASILY go to heaven, simply by repenting your disrespect and believing. That's it, no catch. It's really an amazingly good deal. "Quite frankly, anyone who thinks that this is okay has no sense of morality, and I could never worship a monster like that. I also can't see how anyone could enjoy heaven knowing that all their friends who didn't subscribe to the correct version of the correct faith are burning FOREVER." Again, this is not the subject. You're LITERALLY admitting that you're talking about morals here, when the title specifically says what this argument is really about.