God Most Likely Does Not Exist

Thx Con! Burden Of Proof I will be defending that the Burden of Proof is not shared. 1. I am not "Affirming" a statement i am simply saying that the hypothesis put forward which is "God Exists" and i simply reject that notion for a lack of evidence for it and Con needs to show why me rejecting the notion that God exists is unreasonable. 2. However if you want the BOP to be shared i guess we can go by that however it is Con who has to try to convince me that me saying that god most likely does not exist is a unreasonable notion because my claim would not make any sense if there was no Affirmative claim that came before it which in this case was "God Exists" even though Con didn't say that at first my statement that God most likely does not exist has to be logically followed by a affirmative stance which is why i think that Con has to convince me of God's existence since i am simply rejecting the claim that he does exist. Evidence of God i want to say that one of my reasons that god most likely does not exist is that there is simply no evidence for his existence. Con does bring forth some evidence but i address his points in the round above. The points he does bring up though are not empirical scientific evidence where we can measure and try to demonstrate God's existence. If God is beyond Space and Time then he his beyond our existence of universe and that means he does not exist History God's I am showing that us fallible humans make up stuff all the time as shown in all the historical god's we made up and i am just saying that God is just another fallible human construct. The Beginning of the Universe could of been causes by some advanced race of aliens and not a transcendent personal god so some stuff that aren't explained yet don't need to be attributed to god. Nature of God As i said before we were wrong before on the thousands of god's we made up, The God of Monotheism is against really big odds of not being one of the god's that were fake. As you stated " And how does human fallibility affirm the resolution also?" You admit humans are fallible and all the proof we have of these god's are in books written by humans before we knew the earth orbited the sun. Plus Atheism does not make any claims, it rejects the theist notion that god exists and the reason why people are atheists is because of lack of evidence. Omnipotence Paradox Saying that God is not bound by Logic is completely nonsensical Here is a link showing why God can not be outside of logic http://benstanhope.blogspot.com... So until then all my arguments stand Plus if god is not bound by logic he is by definition Illogical. So Therefore its illogical to believe in God. What if he is bound by logic? In this case he would be limited on what he can do, Let me bring up another example. If this god can do whatever he wants can he create something that even he himself can not not do. If he can do anything but yet there is nothing left for him to do then that's a limitation on what he can do but lets say he can create something that he cannot do even with his all powerful state (without limiting himself) then that's a limit on what he can do. But if its impossible for him to create anything he cannot do then that's a limitation on his part. So Rather he can create something that is more powerful than him in which he is not the most powerful thing or he cant cause he is the greatest possible thing in which that is a limitation on God's part. Problem of Evil Con brings up that suffering exists in the world because God gave us free will and that trying to change it would interfere with our free will. I would have to pose the question about why Free will is a good thing, I'm not exactly sure. Since im a determinist i don't believe in free will and Con's argument fails from the start so i need some proof on how free will exists first. So two questions Con needs to answer is, Does Free will exists? and Is Free will the greater good and that it is better for us to have free will and suffer than to not have free will and not suffer?. Even if free will is a great good, that doesn"t mean we should never interfere with it. If we see someone about to commit murder and do nothing about it, it is no defense to appeal to how wonderful it is that the murderer has free will. The existence and goodness of free will is compatible with interfering with it. So why doesn"t God prevent evil actions? All knowing and no free will This argument would go away if Con takes that we don't have free will but for right now I'm going to assume that he thinks we do have free will, So Lets assume we do have free will as most religions say we do. The Reason why a All Knowing Being and free will cant coexist is because a All Knowing being knows all of your actions before you do them. A All Knowing God already knows what choices you will make He already knows that you might go to heaven or hell etc. Its Kind of like determinism, All of your actions are already known its just that you have not done them yet. Natural Evil I would have to respond by saying that if a god who is personal and wanted is Perfectly Good then he would care for our subjective feelings of suffering, It is true that what we suffer means nothing to the universe at large but if a god exists and at that a all powerful and all Good God. Then this God would not watch by and see us suffer from natural causes. At least a god who is personal and does not want us to suffer. Hell This Point isn't irrelevant, cause if it is true a All Good God can not exist. You State when talking about Natural evil that "In the Christian view of life, mortal death is not the end of one's existence. An omnibenevolent God does not have to set things right immediately to be all-good, and there's no reason to think such. If an afterlife exists, then we can be assured that all evil that was done will be set right in the future, and that those who suffered and did good will be changed, with justice set right" The only way we know the god we are talking about exits is through the books like The Bible, The Koran, The Torah, all other religious books have a different type of god. So Since they only way we know of God's existence in the first place is from the books that humans wrote in we know of what follows if that certain type of god exists. Here is a link that shows the Bible quotes on Hell, http://www.biblestudytools.com... A lot of these things are really evil and are no way compatible with a All Good God. Unless you discount the holy books that teach this but then again the holy books are the only thing that gave us the idea of The God that we are talking about. And if the Bible is false then is opens up that almost all of Con's augments could be answered with something else, Like Maybe a Deist God who created the universe but does not care about the affairs of humans or it does not have to be a god at all maybe it was some cause that at our point of scientific understanding we just don't understand. Thank you Con, Cant wait for a response! :) Some Links Video on Omnipotence Video on Free will/problem of evil