sale of human organs

Well, I was hoping for a more serious argument. I do not see how the sale of human organs will kill more people than save. Also the procedure will be the same as any other transplant, they will not rip the organs out, this is the 21st century with medical advancements made this will never happen. The status quo causes 40,000-50,000 people to die on organ waitlists per year - Bear at al 2013 If our current predicament looks bad now, future predictions suggest things may become substantially worse. 2015, U.S. organ waiting lists will balloon to almost 160,000, with annual deaths increasing similarly. 40,000 to 50,000 people per year will die on waiting lists. middle of the next decade, and the actual number may well be far higher as more countries obtain the resources necessary to operate organ procurement and transplant systems and dialysis becomes more widely available. the continued existence of shortages leads inevitably to creative, and largely unregulated, responses by which desperate patients seek transplants. Lifting prohibition on organ sales solves the current crisis and saves thousands.- Becker and Elias 14 In 2012, 95,000 American men, women and children were on the waiting list, only about 16,500 kidney transplant operations were performed. an average wait of 4.5 years The most effective change would be to provide their organ that is, establishing a market for organs. Paying donors for their organs would finally eliminate the supply-demand gap. Next on the bio printing argument made A. Bioprinting is only in very basic phases and FDA will hold up Gilpin 14 Lyndsey, staff writer, Tech Republic; "New 3D bioprinter to reproduce human organs, change the face of healthcare: The inside story" Tech Republic; August 1, 2014; http://www.techrepublic.com... FDA regulations will hold up the process. It can take ten years to get something approved by the FDA. the FDA doesn't really know what to do with cells. They know devices, but they don't know what a cell is because a cell makes multiple drugs, does multiple activities. f it's made, harvested and expanded from say, 100 different donors, well now we've got a different ball game." To even reach that point, the researchers still have to overcome the primary obstacles: printing, creating, and testing the cells -- but most importantly, figuring out the basic biology that will allow this to be possible. Much of the research is stop-and-go. Big breakthroughs come every once in a while B. Artificial Organs wont solve anytime soon - Clark 13 - http://www.forbes.com... advances may allow us to "grow" that day is long in the future. In the meantime, the death rate of patients on donor lists will continue to rise. C. Artificial Organs will be too Expensive to stop illegal sale - O'Sullivan 14 The impact that this "organ growing" has on the illegal organ trade will undoubtedly be determined by the cost to the party in need of an organ; Now to the "argument" made against the illegal market advantage, I'm not sure if my opponent fully understand by what I meant as why I claim this as an advantage, I claim it because by legalizing the sale of human organs we dry up the illegal market, or black market for organs. Please correct me if I am wrong, but is it not the purpose to safe lives, not let these people die, and trust me the suffering from organ failure is worse than any surgery, seeing as there is a thing called anesthesia, and pain killing pills (non narcotic) to deal with the after care pain. A. The massive shortage of organs in the United States is driving the underground organ market. Archer 13 Black market organs are transplanted reports there are "broker-friendly" US hospitals, who either don't know or don't care where the organs come from. organs are harvested from a living victim for compensation. In the worst case it involves kidnapping for the purpose of organ harvesting. According tothe World Health Organization, approximately 7,000 kidneys are illegally harvested annually by traffickers. WHO also claims that an organ is sold every hour. This is a mufti-million dollar industry, and it"s only expected to get worse. please cross over my evidence on my impacts of disease from round one that my opponent did not mention. Once again After seeing my opponents arguments, which have little weight, because he has yet to provide any evidence for his claims; therefore my impacts are the only thing on the table. I see nothing else but an affirmative ballet