Many homos are playing some gay friendly heteros for fools by turning some gay, deceiving them, ect.

In conclusion, Con's entire argument is based on false dillemma fallacies and straw man fallacies. Therefore, there is no way that con could win this argument if the voters are fair. Keep in mind, my claim clearly conveys "SOME " heterosexuals can be turned gay. I never said all. Con is arguing as if I claimed ALL heterosexuals can be turned gay. The bottom line is, I'm far more logical as a homophobic atheist False Dilemma. Definition: A limited number of options (usually two) is given, while in reality there are more options. Con is insinuating since homosexuality occurs in many non human species, it's impossible for environmental factors to cause some HUMANS to turn gay. This is CLEARLY flawed logic. Just because homosexuality occurs in non-human species doesnt mean environmental factors cant cause some humans to turn gay. Also, con lied about my source regarding birds turning gay. Con claims the birds don't turn gay and the birds just show homosexual behavior patterns. This is false because the very name of the article is "Mercury poisoning makes male birds homosexual". The author stated " the male birds are mating with other male birds instead of female birds. It doesn't get any gayer than that. The birds clearly turn homosexual because they consumed mercury poisoning. This means environmental factors does cause some non human species to turn gay. In nother words, anyone can turn these birds gay by giving them mercury poison. The study I cited is far more reliable and valid compared to con's sources Studying twins is by far the best way to determine if a behavior is caused by genetics or environmental factors. Not only did the study I cited use the best method to determine if homosexuality is genetic or environmental,, it is by far the largest and most extensive. The study shows unique reactions to environmental factors is what cause people to turn gay. In other words, there is a large variety of ways people turn gay but among some of those reasons are gay pornography, experimentation, sexual abuse, bad experiences with the opposite sex, biological randomness, childhood gender nonconformity and more. Being the fact that experimentation and gay pornography can turn a some people gay, all it takes is a homosexual to persuade the right non-homophobic heterosexual friend to experience homosexuality in watch gay pornography then that heterosexual can possibly turn gay. I would like to advise the voters to Google "5 types of straight crushes" and make sure you read number 5 The gay teen expert 'Ellen Friedrich' clearly conveys that some straight crushes turn into relationships. In other words, some gays end up in a romantic relationship with a heterosexual who obviously turned gay. I've proven without a reasonable doubt that at least some heterosexuals can be turned gay. All con did was mention gay animals, lie about my source and posted links of studies that are inferior and far less reliable then the study I cited. When con post around 3, verify his claims because he has proved that he will lie Neither Genes nor Choice: Same-Sex Attraction Is Mostly a Unique Reaction to Environmental Factors [Journal of Human Sexuality 3:81-114 (2011)] by Neil E. Whitehead8