BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The Rights of the Victim should take precedence over the rights of the accused in felony cases

[Case] I affirm: The Rights of the Victim should take precedence over the rights of the accused in felony cases For analysis of the resolution I offer the following observations: 1. The question in the resolution is not over the presumption of innocence. The resolution is questioning the prioritization of rights. 2. A felony case is different then a misdemeanor case. Therefore, we are talking about egregious crimes, such as rape, murder, kidnapping. Value: Justice Value Criterion: Maintaining Culpability Justification: A value of justice is implied in the resolution since we are discussing punishment and rights in a court system. Thus, that legal system ought to be just. Maintaining Culpability achieves justice because the only way to properly allocate due is to make a distinction between the legally innocent and legally culpable. If there was no distinction, then justice could not be allocated, and thus there would be no need for a legal system. Contention I: Prioritizing Rights When rights come into conflict it is an obligation of any legal system to prioritize the rights of the victim/innocent over the culpable. If the legal system does not prioritize these rights first, then the government has created equality between the culpable and innocent. From this act, there is no legal or moral distinction between the two, thus there is no need for a legal system.
Men are physically superior to Women.

Firstly, you seem to lack the fundamental ability to check my argument: a physical benefit of women is pregnancy. This is extremely important; moreso than being slgihtly stronger. I made this explicit, and I implore you to actually address it. Instead, you basically help my case saying that women become better able to handle pain during pregnancy than men normally. However, there is a massive difference between pain acuteness and ability to handle pain. A superior human can feel pain more acutely, so they know where the problem is in their body: that's why we have pain receptors. Without them, we wouldn't recognise danger. This is a benefit. Moreover, the source does not prove that women are less able to deal with the pain. As women can deal with the pain just as well, then it makes them physically equal. Moreover, I don't understand your menstrual nature about the topic. You bring up the Minoan civilisation and how "men make good leaders", then criticise me for talking about "why they are better leaders". You simply cannot make your mind up, can you?Also, I am not a woman. How many women are called "Stephen"? And you criticise my researching skill...
Men are physically superior to Women.

In regards to your argument concerning pregnancy I have to give you this that the same article that has proven the GIRK2 protein in women states that during pregnancy it is true a woman is more capable of withstanding pain, only until the baby arrives. Now back to my main argument which is "MEN ARE PHYSICALLY SUPERIOR THAN WOMEN" men are physically superior because of their higher pain tolerance as stated not by me but by any google search containing "GIRK2 women men protein" my point is not who is more important in society as that is a very debatable issue to be opened on a new debate i would be happy to have with you Ms. Stephen hawking. Concerning the fact that you ignorantly refuted my painkiller claim simply because it may have seemed as a deduction not a fact is offensive which is why i implore you to try to educate yourself and research a little bit more before you speak because the more i research the more i solidify my argument. And, because i see you have difficulty researching yourself i took the liberty of pasting a link containing a neutral point of view by simply saying test results, which backs up my claim word by word: http://www.scientificamerican.com... and again i plead you focus on my statement Ms. Hawkins, I stated why men are physically superior not why they are better leaders, better fathers or anything else this is not of my concern.
Men are physically superior to Women.

My opponent claims I misrepresent him by saying all societies have been patriarchal since the "dawn of time", except there's masses of simple falsehoods regarding this: many of the Native American Tribes, such as the Hopi and the Iroquois tribes all were matriarchal in nature. Moreover, modern societies in the west are explicitly androgynous and based on equality in the eyes of the law and equality of opportunity. His Minoan example is comical in fact as all he is correct the Minoan civilisation was matriarchal, but it fell when an expansionist aggressive nation effectively wiped out the nation, after natural disasters ruining the country's success. Also, my opponent's claims about women needing more painkillers, or being able to take less pain, is again simply fictitiously making claims up. This is not grounded at all in fact, and simply has no reason to be true. Moreover, the fact women feel pain more acutely is a benefit, not a loss. We grow pain receptors in our body to tell us when something is wrong. Thus, having more pain receptors makes women better off, not worse.And finally, and most importantly, my opponent completely ignored my case, which is pregnancy makes women just as if not superior in a physical aspect to men.
Men are physically superior to Women.

Women are physically inferior to men for one simple reason: the menstrual cycle. It is well know that women lose about half a litre of blood during their period. This creates a physical abatement of their energy depriving them of some of the many physical advantages men are adorned with. Studies have shown my point is true as shown by a Although my opponent has gone completely off-topic, attacking me personally which is a sign of prostration to moral and civilized talk, I will gladly answer him only to justify my point furthermore. My "sexist drivel" is not nonsense as it is based on purely naive and childish stereotypes as I have two infallible truth behind me science and history. History does not lie, over a course of 80,000 years since the dawn of civilization a patriarchal structure can be seen across all civilizations. The most prominent exception might lie with the Minoan civilization which saw a high priestess as its ruler until its unruly demise due to misguided actions by the high priestess. The reason men make good leaders is their physical dominance over women. Simply put if women were physically superior they would be the ones calling the shots. Survival of the fittest. Now scientifically speaking men can withstand more pain than women which is why they are physically superior as, again, they are genetically built to withstand more pain. Research shows that women have more pain receptors on their skin thus making them feel pain differently, more intensely. The protein GIRK2 is a protein that affects the pain threshold of a human being among other things. Studies have shown that women have more of this protein thus making them feel more pain. It can even lead to a women needing double the amount of painkillers than a man, just to allay their aches. Thus, through men's higher pain threshold, men are clearly capable of withstanding more pain as proven not by any "naive or childish" stereotypes as per my opponent's request, but by pure hard facts.
Men are physically superior to Women.

Are women worse physically than men? No, and that is due to one simple word: pregnancy. This ability trumps the minor physical advantages men have, to the extent that it is perfectly balanced. Women are necessary for the race to continue, and their ability to procreate makes women physically essential to society, unlike men. The majority of my opponent's argument is sexist drivel, such as man returning to home to fix up the house. Simply put, the evidence of this comes down to outdated, naive and childish stereotypes which have no bearing to reality. There are some cases where it is true man does most of the work, and just as many cases where women do most of the work: it's not relevant.Moreover, women repeatedly work and work as self-sufficient women in the large industry, and as such claiming things as stereotypically naive and frankly comically idiotic as "While a woman's only worries are whether she "remembered to turn off the oven" doesn't bear weight.In short, the minor advantages men have in the department of physical power does not create an impassable divide to woman, and the female ability to procreate gives women an extreme physical power which deserves recognition as being more important.
Men are physically superior to Women.

I believe that women are physically inferior to men because they are biologically born weaker. This can be seen in sports as well as in any mundane workplace. Women are usually more languorous when it comes to the workplace as their body is not resolute enough to hold them throughout the day. Certain partisans may agree to a point that they are the better gender as they are tired from after work duties as their reverence is questioned everyday at home. I believe that they actually work as hard as men. When a man returns to his home he is confronted with the duties of not only the rest of his work, but also the stodgy effects of trying to fix every single nook and cranny in the home. In any modern household accidents are bound to happen and with the man too busy mollifying the woman trying to relieve himself from the pains of a women crying all night long, he also considers the fact that he is the one that will clean up afterwards. Finding a balance between these two points is not easy as a man must work to also show a sense of elation on his face in fear of his house being torn apart by the lack of coherence among his wife and children. While a woman's only worries are whether she "remembered to turn off the oven" or "put the clothes out to dry" these acquiescent women were meant to be subservient as they are for they are truly physically incapable of performing the audacious tasks demanded daily from a man. The paramount example demonstrating society's acceptance of this fact is the olympics. In all sports, with no exception, men beat out women's world records superlatively. This is because men are built to be the load bearers of the human race. They were built to be the intrepid warriors protecting the meeker minority, and if they see their troubles as too much, may they know that all they endure is merely a dearth of what the men have to face everyday of their lives.
Men are physically superior to Women.

My NameIf PRO just wanted to hook up, he could've just said. My argumentMy argument was pregnancy, a physical factor, is the single overwhelming factor which makes women more important. PRO hasn't managed to read this, possibly due to being abused as a child by a sheep, or not understanding my case. In case of the latter, we should vote against him. In case of the former, we should vote against him, even though he had a woolly childhood. I mean, it's just baa-d luck. No need to be sheepish. My Opponent's caseThe point on pregnancy seems to be my opponent boxing his shadow: he seems to still be claiming that women are stronger during labour. Women feeling pain more acutely is an advantage, again. If we couldn't feel ourself being hit, we couldn't register how much damage the blows did, and act accordingly. If we didn't feel pain, we'd fight in foolish situations. Stronger pain receptors firstly make us more likely to flee from danger and take less stupid risks, and secondly it makes us more empathetic, sympathetic, and all-around nicer persons. From here, the rest of the points are moot. The menstrual cycle is irrelevant, as it is a minor drawback to the massive benefit of pregnancy, and the GIRK protein falls into my previous case. However, women respond better to such drugs as olanine, another painkiller, making the morphine point moot. But in general the pain thing is irrelevant. To conclude, my opponent didn't address my case. Pregnancy makes women in general better physically. Moreover, the ability to feel pain makes women better physically. Nothing else needs to be said. My opponent's sources agree with me on the basic facts, which point to the irrefutible key aspect: women are physically no worse than men.
Men are physically superior to Women.

This is getting really fun.This argument is getting a bit off-topic, opening into things that have no relation to our main topic so I took the liberty of organizing the arguments under these titles: With the one bold, italicized and underlined , to be debated.Your Name: Your name is not my matter of debate. Reading again through your lines I simply misunderstood your definition of we (have pain receptors) as it was ambiguous. My name "Ms. Stephen" was simply a jab at that. Now, Mr. Stephen can we continue?Which make better leaders: Now, I saw this argument being diverted to another direction (which make better leaders) so I simply ignored it but did not overlook it because my main argument was meant to be which are more powerful physically .My argument:Pregnancy*: I have researched across many articles all of them state that during labor their pain threshold is higher allowing them to withstand the pain intensive labor. So yes women are stronger during labor (I'm sorry if I wsnt clear enough). Now stronger is a very loaded word as it comes with a backstory. it has been determined (and will be will be elaboated upon) that women already have a weaker pain threshold than men. We must take care when saying women are stronger than men during labor as no basis has been given by neither you nor anyone else on that."Feel pain more acutely": Women feel more pain, and with their lower threshold it is actually detrimental to feel pain. This argument is an extraneous detail that should not be considered as it is one with no scientific evidence or proof (so you don't become a smart-a$$: my article states that women feel more pain, not that this is superior in any way) deriving any conclusion from this other than the ones already in the articles is simply extraneous to my point.Menstrual Cycle: Simply put.Women lose a lot of blood (0.5 litres). Losing blood makes you weak. Women are generally weaker.The GIRK2 Protein: Here is my argument clean and simple: If you read my link thoroughly it states the pain threshold for women is lower, which means they are capable of handling less pain. This has nothing to do with their ability to feel pain which is the same across both genders. This is very important as you seem to have misread the article. It states that across different species they found that mice with the inability to produce this protein had lower pain threshold. This protein is not as abundant in women as it is in men. It also stated that these same "mutant" mice could not respond to morphine or similar painkillers again adressing my previous statementIn conclusion, this shouldn't even be a matter of debate for one reason. It has been physically proven with science across multiple tests. The whole point of the experiment was to see which gender had a higher pain threshold. To prove my point i have compiled all the links of every single article backing up my claim that Men have higher pain threshold.http://dft.ba...http://dft.ba...http://dft.ba...
Poes are better than trolls.

Thank you for accepting. Counter: Being exposed as a Poe feels less insulting than being caught trolling. In my experience, less respect to my unorthodox ideas is given when trolling. When assumed as a Poe, I see that the responder is simply avoiding my challenge. They evade my initiated offer by complimenting my Poe account sarcastically. Trolls are dismissed; poes are more dramatic and evoke less hostility. So, I do not agree that being called a Poe is worse. Addressing an issue raised in the comments section: poes are still superior to really good trolls because it takes a really good troll just to be on equal footing with a Poe. The fair fight ends when the struggling troll has to contend with an inherently consistent Poe.
Poes are better than trolls.

Good day dear Sir! After Reading your argument I decided to do a good old search from our everlasting friend, Google. And what I found was quite interesting. My first discovery was this, P.O.E.S., a international (specific U.S. and U.K.) satellite Program designed to check the weather. "Data from the POES series supports a broad range of environmental monitoring applications including weather analysis and forecasting, climate research and prediction, global sea surface temperature measurements, atmospheric soundings of temperature and humidity, ocean dynamics research, volcanic eruption monitoring, forest fire detection, global vegetation analysis, search and rescue, and many other applications." http://www.ospo.noaa.gov... The other thing found was not very appropriate. Something about African slang I recall... Then again, never trust Wikipedia. http://en.wiktionary.org... The point is, calling someone a poe(s) (correct term) is worse than calling someone a troll, which is playful and kind. Tsk Tsk. Enchiladas Nom Nom.
Poes are better than trolls.

I have been reading the hulk comic for over TEN YEARS! The Hulk the the pure representation of rage, the highest level of anger. I think he's just lashing out, not Poe"ing" OR trolling. I know the Hulk. And you jumped from Tony Stark being a Poe to the Hulk. That does not make sense. Also, you did nothing to defend yourself against my NASCAR post. So you have just proved that a Poe is the essence of death itself. Forgive, my rage took over there. Now as this debate ends, I would like to thank you for being such a great opponent. As hard as it was, I believe you did an excellent job of countering my posts. Also, thank you for changing the subject from the original topic, Poe Vs. Troll, to Marvel Comic's, Iron Man and Hulk. As a final saying... Poe is not better than a troll. In fact, Poe is a type of troll. also, children, don't Poe. Just Troll. It will save lives. http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com...
Poes are better than trolls.

The hulk does kill people, and Banner probably is stuck being in the thrill of it until hulk runs out of fuel. As for the hulk either trolling or poe-ing his own anger against General Ross' army, the hulk's allegiance, intentions and motives are usually questioned. So as long as I'm improvising, the hulk is a Poe as well. Hulk's sense of humor is rarely expressed, and it's hard to tell if hulk's anger is going to be logically useful or just a tantrum.
Poes are better than trolls.

So what you are saying is that while Stark "Bugs"(the smallest and shortest for of troll) Banner, Poe's law is this? http://www.youtube.com... http://www.youtube.com... God bless... So this is what a Poe is? I think you should stick to trolling. True, trolling has been misused a lot. People have died. But seriously, this is your mentality?
Poes are better than trolls.

Ah, the joy of debate... While on my search for POE I cam across a rhyme about them, written by the ancient Nords. Troll kalla mik trungl sj11;trungnis, au"sug j11;tuns, "ls"lar b11;l, vilsinn v11;lu, v11;r" nafjar"ar, hv"lsveg himins " hvat's troll nema "at? No idea what it says, Wikipedia gave a translation, but never trust Wikipedia. Sot he question of the day is: Who watching this debate can say "I am a Troll?" Here is the definition of a troll, if you don't know already: A person who invokes anger with constant annoyances or posts online, usually to get an Irate response. Here's the thing. Most of the time "trolling" (there are different definitions for other people, above summed it up) is playful, but sometimes people mistake playful with Rage induced Fury of Ultimate Death and Pandemonium. And it's pretty easy to spot a troll, so finding a Poe shouldn't be hard. In other words, a Poe is a Quiet Troll. Now if you pardon me, I am off to troll some fish. http://www.merriam-webster.com... http://www.google.com...
Poes are better than trolls.

Well done dear sir! Two things this time. #1 Wikipedia (never trust) Poe (born Anne Decatur Danielewski) (born March 23, 1967), is an American singer, songwriter, and record producer. Poe's musical style is a unique blend of Rock, Jazz, Electronica, Folk, and Hip Hop elements combining intimate lyrical compositions. Many of Poe's songs have been featured in films and on television. Poe first hit the modern rock charts in 1995. Well that added to my random. #2 POE, A.K.A. Path of Exile. MMO Switz version of Diablo (specifically Diablo II). Path of Exile is an online Action RPG set in the dark fantasy world of Wraeclast. They're a small independent team of hardcore gamers based in New Zealand and have created Path of Exile as the game that they'd want to play themselves. It is designed around a strong barter-based online item economy, deep character customization, competitive PvP and ladder races. The game is completely free and will never be "pay to win". [Grinding Gear Games] http://www.metacritic.com... Now I would like to address something. A Poe may be secretive, but is it that funny when only you know? Like you laugh at work and then the people would be like "whats wrong with you?" Right? Now granted, being a Poe has advantages when trying not to get banned from server, but then again, where is the fun when no one knows? Where with Trolls, well... Nom Nom.
Is Kazoo kid the Illuminati Lord? (reincarnation)

Hilarious. You aren't the only person to be able to change fonts sizes. Before I start, could we keep the sizes at 3(12pt)? I had a migrane when I read your argument. Thanks.Also, read the satanic bible and get AIDs just by looking at the table of contents. Anyways, I hope you watched the video because the kid was flying and had flames popping up behind him. Is that not a sign that he holds power under the authority of Satan? You remember the beast that is to come out of the water and do miracles? He did a miracle by setting the whole forest on fire without burning it. Amazing little freak isn't he?