Be it Resolved That Abortion Should Be Banned

An abortion debate: rendering the clichï¿½, I Accept. It is a fetus! It is not a fetus! Heak what is fetus. "abortion and why it is so wrong and downright evil. I would like to start with a story." The story is that morals have been philosophically debated for the span of human life basically. So what is evil to Y person might not be a common evil to X person. 1.e•vil/ˈēvəl/ Adjective:Profoundly immoral and malevolent. Noun:Profound immorality, wickedness, and depravity, esp. when regarded as a supernatural force. That is the dictionary. However what is immoral, how can one justify that with pure certainty? Nothing is known but something immoral can be probable amongst the human race. http://en.wikipedia.org... "You were once a child, were you not? You were once an egg. Then you were fertilized. You grew and became the person you are now. You could be the president, the doctor that saved a little girl's life or a famous banker. But what if your mother had an abortion? Where would you be? That's right. You WOULDN'T be. You'd be dead and nonexistent." What happens if this mother had the child (not an abortion) and that child was not a president of X country (rare), or a famous banker, or a doctor (both difficult to obtain). What would happen if that child became a criminal due environmental forces that can qualify as a mere release from X environment on that person who was rasided in it. What if and if and if and on can become of this person that wouldn't be. How do I know that I am existing? Is it because I touch, feel, breath and can interpret something non existent? For all I know the earth could be purgatory (as defined in the Christian bible) and I am no higher being to tell you what is existing and what is not existing. Earth= purgatory fits the requirements, as long as X human is on planet earth and time keeps ticking, some form of disability or suffering will occur . 1.pur•ga•to•ry/ˈpərgəˌtï¿½rē/ Noun:(in Roman Catholic doctrine) A place or state of suffering inhabited by the souls of sinners who are expiating their sins before going... Adjective:Having the quality of cleansing or purifying. A story: A man who thought he was a man by X meaning found out that X was a lie. In figuring out the lie a state of suffering, this man has become. How do I know I exist in what I think that I exist in? Freakonomics highly controversial thesis= the crime rate dropped due to women having abortions. Generally a person is more likely to turn out to be an average person when conceived, probally not the president. I do not stand fully with this thesis though I will bring it into the debate for its thesis on the this topic. The audience can be the judge. http://www.freakonomics.com... The story is lovely, and personally heart warming to read that people still care about other people. But wait? Is abortion impersonal and just businesslike. Take the bombing of Japan that was businesslike due to increased rationality. For the record it was to save lives. ( No only North American and coalition lives). Now is it to be defined that when a woman has an abortion it is just businesslike and committed to her lacking feeling towards the fetus, (or is it a fetus)?. Unless that woman is a sociopath then no. People who have had an abortion or lost a child through miscarriage are not commiting an abortion like a sociopath. There is a personal experience or connection generally, but the abortion is done with thinking, (hopefully). The Nazis killed businesslike. When on trial "I was just doing my job when I took my gun and pointed it at the inferiors". Again abortion is not businesslike. About Half of the women that have had an abortion are under the age of 25. Take a 17 year old who does have a child in the ghetto. That is a child producing a child. That 17 year olds future that was already not in her favor is officialy not in her favor. (Future being going to school, focusing on the self to build the self to affect the other). Can a woman or a community help define what is best for the micro self or for that 17 year old child. Stop killing babies? Well if that baby is born that baby of a child as my example will probally have a difficult life, perhaps by having that baby she is already nonexistent (that being future of the self). http://www.guttmacher.org... "I don't care if this is helping "keep down world population". We might as well be killing in MASSES the way the Nazis did! Is that not the same thing we are already doing?" A.It is keeping down the world population, which is a benefit. The U.S. is about 309 million people by 2050 that figure will jump to 450 million. U.S. people use a ton of resources. Perhaps the U.S. people who are using oil and blood money are debabtly a race of evil people. If the U.S. is a race of evil people, evil as in the definition, is it immoral to stuff the face with French fries and cry I am hungry after eating an hour ago. People in Liberia are starving, there is genocides that have occurred in Africa. By the out of Africa theory, the human race should help Africa. The U.S. stated that they will help those in need such as Libya. Well why doesn't the U.S. prevent Genreral Buttnacked from producing 10 9.11's. http://www.youtube.com... B.Is killing immoral, a state in the U.S. cannot weigh has different degrees of the killing and cannot agree on the subject. Homicide, manslaughter, Murder, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, . Justified killing protecting a Texas front lawn. C."Abortion falls under all three definitions. So why are those who preform abortions and those who have abortions not getting punishment? They are just as bad as some of the worst criminals. They are murderers." D. Are they really? A sister having an abortion is by far worst than the criminal who is sticking me up as I type on my computer. Then why has society not outlawed it? Why is it when they do there is such a roar from the community for and against the law? The guy sticking me up who looks to be about 30, I think knows better, at least he is letting me type my words until my clock runs out. E.Abortions will still occur even outlawed and that crime would be life in prison for the most criminal of gully criminalies. Is it a crime to lock Brenda up if she would have an abortion, to seek the best road for her life. What road am I on? Im going to roll a dice and find out, because it is never known. Locking her up when Brenda is capable of being a president, I personally would deem that a crime. Brenda by having the ability to choose when pro life and pro choice is pro choice, might be one helluva president, that is now with Crazy Slice the bandit in the dungeon. Well at least she is not talking to the rats, and Crazy Slice might help her understand her crime, what is the crime, and how her time should be done to benefit or not from the time to do nothing but stare at some nice walls, that get cleaned at "WAKE UP ITS 5 SCUMBAGS WHY ISNT YOUR BED MADE ALREADY". F.Abortion is an emotional experience. To lock away someone because they could not take on the burden of having to care for another child can be a crime. Why is it that some people from a hood when in prison for crack distribution at 14, retain their innocence. Perhaps they were raised to fail and benefit the system of the U.S. that puts a profit on that 14 year olds head. That 14 year old was raised by criminals in an overindustrilized community not knowing what life is. A group that would be formally called GEO Group, a private prison company that is expanding. The more people locked up the more money for the ruling class. http://www.geogroup.com... G.And so I ask you. Why? Is it so necessary? Why do we need to kill off so many? There are so many other options. Adoption is a perfectly fine option. Or, better yet, if you have the ability to, why don't you just raise the child yourself? For the reasons I have stated today, this resolution MUST and WILL stand for the sake of these 42 million children and the others that are yet to come. H.Well your asking me so I can not tell you if it is necessary or not. But will do my best to advocate for the sisters like you. IF more sisters sway the democratic community to the left or right, I will back that up. Locke defined a democracy to be likened to- Person A does not vote for Person As selfish motives, but votes for the common good or Person B and Person C. Locke impacted the founding fathers of the U.S. I can not raise a child and if I could become impregnated I would not have the child, for I have a life to live, and I am not betting on Person Z in caring for my child. My child will be a product of Dad. Not Dad (the other dad because I did not exist, for the childs best interest.) Well why did you have the child in the first place? Well technically I cannot get laid, and I am a 22 virgin who personally is lucky to be alive, and still does not understand the luck that got me to be typing on this computer. Personally I do not want to live as I am living, because my cost is outweighing the reward of living, but to end it in the moment of truth is heavy, so if it does happen I thought about it. For abortion it is thought about, in all types of minds. When I wake up I do recall someone on one special day- X told me "Stop complaining about this, what the F*** is wrong with you, you should not be here." Adoption is good idea, but sometimes adoption is not seen for some people. Remember people who have babies are all different types of people from different backgrounds. Some sisters do not have the luxury of typing on a computer to know what adoption is. I can even spell adoption. I. I thank you for the debate.