Evolution is better than creationism

"By unwavering mathematical law we can prove our universe was designed" Uh, no we can't. Do you know how we determine of something is designed or not? By comparing with things that are not designed. "The resourcefulness of life..." No this is explained perfectly by evolution. Anything that reproduces, carries on its genes. This causes those unable to reproduce by lack of ability to survive to not pass on those genes. This causes things to be adapted to an environment. THIS IS THE FOUNDATION OF EVOLUTION. HOW IS THIS EVIDNECE FOR GOD? "Infused instinct..." So magic made animals know what to do? You're hilarious! Evolution of behaviour works in the same way. As I have explained to you through previous discourse, genes do have the capacity to influence behaviour. Now, if one animal has a predisposition to stay in groups, and the other is alone, it may allow for easier gathering of food. However, it is also possible for a greater risk of disease transmission in that group. This is all dependant on circumstances. Everything has benefits and drawbacks, and the environment shapes the organism. E organism is not directly shaped for the environment. "Man has more than animal instinct" Actually we have almost none. We have a more plastic brain, which allows for the ability to learn very easily. "We have the power of reason" That's to do with our ability to communicate and understand abstract concepts, which comes from the brain's plasticity. "Provision for living is revealed in the wonder of genes" You don't understand genetics. DNA is a molecule. Nothing more. It catalyses reactions, and so an RNA molecule was built off of it. Your argument is an argument from personal incredulity. Your failure to comprehend biology is not proof of god. The sixth argument is pathetic. "Only infinite wisdom..." is no more than an eloquently worded god of the gaps argument. I have heard the ontological argument. You can't just logic god into existence. This argument is based on the assumption that man can't think of an infinitely great being. My argument is that a man can think of a being greater than himself. He can think of a being greater than that etc. However, when he takes all attributes he considers desirable and ascribes infinity to that attribute, he is unable to think of a being greater than that by definiton. The concept of god is not the divine nature of man, but the human nature of god. He was originally thought to be a human, but over time that concept evolved. "That's why evolution is illogical" EVOLUTION EXPLAINS COMPLEXITY "And the Big Bang is illogical" First, the Big Bang isn't the origin of life, it explains the EXPANSION of he universe. The origin of life is called abiogenesis. The origin of the universe, if you may, is before the Big Bang. However, physicists cannot yet describe it as there is no working marriage of quantum mechanics (the study of the very small) and general relativity (the study of the high energy). The origin of the universe is the highest-energy and smallest possible thing. That, my friend, is why we can't yet answer the origin of the universe... YET. However the Big Bang and origin of the universe is actually NOTHING to do with evolution other than being modern science. "Why doesn't this happen now?" It kind of does. Particles and antiparticles are constantly popping in and out of existence on the quantum level. On the magnitude of the singularity? We don't know yet. Why don't you find out instead of giving non-explanations like a sky-wizard did it? "Actually you have to believe that happened in cosmology to understand evolution" Only when it affects evolution. Most of it doesn't apply. "Where? I've never heard of it." Well find out then! www.talkorigins.org has great stuff on evolution, while AronRa, (youtube.com/user/AronRa) is also great at explanation of concepts of evolution. But be careful, he isn't particularly tolerant of creationists. "God tested Abraham's faith" No decent parent would sacrifice their child for anything. "My three delightful children are my only chance at a second life, or even an immortal one. And I'll tell you something; if I was told to sacrifice them to prove my devotion to god and admire the man who said 'Yes I'll gut my kid to show my love of god' I would say, no.., F**K you" -Christopher Hitchens That article is refuting strawman arguments and is a show of how stupid creationism is. They have no idea how evolution works, unlike the places I cited here. Some forms of creatardation aren't worthy of response. Transitional forms off the top of my head: -Tiktaalik - sea to land animals -Australopithecus - upright walking ape -Ambulocetus - whale -Basilosaurus -whale, later form -Archae-motherf**kin-opteryx - dinosaur to bird "Understanding how things work" What? You have demonstrated you don't understand evolution. Of course you won't understand how things work! "Too many questions, not enough answers" Because most of the people around you are creatards how do you go about learning about evolution? Do you ask questions and find out the answer through research, or do you just automatically assume evolution is a lie and believe whatever your pastor says about it? "Spontaneous propagation" There is a transition between asexual and sexual reproduction. It's a process I do not fully understand, but it's again better than "a sky wizard did it" "If you don't understand it why is it so popular?" I understand it, but don't have complete knowledge of all of it, but you don't need to know every single intricate detail of a topic to accept it. You could never accept anything ever if that was the case. But that wasn't what I said. I said YOU don't understand it. Evolution is a theory, but I have already explained IT MEANS SOMETHING DIFFERENT IN SCIENCE! "Evidence is ridiculous?" No when you go full crockoduck you ask for evidence that would actually disprove evolution! http://en.m.wikipedia.org... "Both creationism and evolution have a surprising amount of evidence" If you mean surprising by creationism has less than aliens inventing the pyramids, or that evolution is the most substantiated scientific theory known? Good objections to creation "science" youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAC3481305829426D youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSr63zLFV8-G41HEg-H11bMqat5_Mca1i youtube.com/playlist?list=PL969utfM58zj-rVkfcceNHyxNW_h8UAcn This has been an engaging debate. Too bad you have been arguing against a strawman.