Generation 1 was the Worst Pokemon Generation

First, a few rebuttals. This does not even include firered and leafgreen, which can be counted as generation 1 games as they are remakes of the original games, red and blue.http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net...FireRed and LeafGreen are Generation 3 games.Without this generation, there could be no other generations.If Gen 2 took it's place as first, would things be worse? You're not arguing for the game there, but merely the spot it claims as the first game.Some weird ones include "Garbodor", a misshapen pile of who knows what, and "Aegislash", basically a sword and shield.Some other weird ones include Muk, a misshapen pile of who knows what, and Magneton, basically 3 magnets glued together. This is a less challenging avenue for artists, who just can make up almost anything they feel like instead of adhering to biological standards of what living creatures should look like. But it is a more creative avenue. Who wants to see regular animals over and over again? This adds more possiblilities, leading to Pokemon for people of all tastes. Also, even though they can add more things, it still resembles it's source object while being creative. Zebstrika, while still resembling a zebra, has volt patterns as stripes to make it more interesting, while still a zebra.This makes the Pokemon of newer generations, especially the two latest ones, less believable. Since when was Pokemon believable?It contains a simplistic plot that engrossed gamers without confusing, added information.The fun gameplay was what attracted gamers, not it's simple plot. The plot is like dessert. And in Gen 1, we got the main meal, but no dessert. The plot is not awful, but inferior to others. The other games may have not had a grand plot the game revolved around, but it was a nice extra touch this generation lacked.I believe Generation 1 felt like a rough draft, a template for the rest of the Pokemon games. Yes, I understand it is the earliest and this will happen, but we are comparing games side by side, so time doesn't matter. Reason 5: Technical IssuesCritical hits were based off of Speed, so Pokemon like Alakazam got even more OP. Focus Energy cuts your critical hit ratio. Hyper Beam is OP, because if you kill your opponent, you don't have to recharge. Anyone remember Wrap? It's pretty annoying to play with these problems.Reason 6: Simply OutclassedGeneration 1 were great games for their time, but GameFreak's recent Pokemon games have shown how badly it has aged. Gen 1 was simply outclassed by the others. Gen 2 beat it in gameplay. Gen 3 had a unique idea of conflicting teams, and is ideal for Pokemon hacks. Generation 4 had great villains and a wonderful region. Generation 5's ending and admittedly, Pokemon were great. Generation 6 was just fun and abounded in multiplayer features. What Gen 1 had was in the remakes, (which was Gen 3) except made better. The other games took what Gen 1 had and built on it. Would you have a random piece of nice building stone during 1995, or a house built using that stone along with new good building stones stones in 2009? Yes, 1995 had the stone first, but 2009 took that stone and built on to it while still keeping it stone. Pokemon Platinum is a Pokemon game, nonetheless. It has a simple, easy to follow plot and great gameplay, but adds new things while still keeping Pokemon at the core.Sources:http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net...(move)http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net...(move)http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net...