God? [Or Evolution]

1. A) I. That's a common mistake. Chapter two says "no bush of the field was yet in the land and no small plant of the field had yet sprung up""for the Lord God had not caused it to rain on the land, and there was no man to work the ground" The field plants, not fruit trees and flowers and grass. If you don't understand too well, check out https://answersingenesis.org... There's some translation issues. On the third day of the Creation Week God made certain types of plants: """grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree" (Genesis 1:11). Each of these terms translates specific Hebrew terms for grass (deshe"), the seed-yielding herbs ("eseb mazria zera), and the fruit trees (ets pariy).Verses 5 and 6 of chapter 2 provide a description of what the world was like prior to the creation of man. Two specific types of plants are translated from specific Hebrew terms: """plant of the field" (siah hassadeh) and """herb of the field" (eseb hassadeh). Hebrew scholar Mark Futato defines these terms as """wild shrubs of the steppe" and """cultivated grain" respectively. The wild shrubs are thorny, and they didn't come until after the first sin II. God can be called both Eholim and YHWH. He has many different names. If he's mentioned differently, It doesn't mean that there are different sources. B) https://answersingenesis.org... (hard to explain, I'm not a super awesome and eloquent person XD) 2. Homo naledi"s shoulder joints and curved finger bones are typical of tree-swinging apes. Its flared hips are typical of australopithecine apes. The lower ribcage widens just like the ribcage of australopithecine apes. And while Homo naledi reportedly has a """generally humanlike ankle and foot" in that the shapes of some of the foot bones could be consistent with an arched foot, this is described in the study as a lower arch with a different orientation than typical of the modern human foot. About skulls: Homo naledi"s skulls: With its small size, sloped face, and lack of protruding nasal bones, however, it could easily accommodate an australopithecine ape"s brain. Homo naledi skulls are less than half the size of modern humans" and substantially smaller than typical archaic human skulls. source: https://answersingenesis.org... check it out.... more detailed Also, I might as well say, Adam and Eve disproves Human Evolution... 3. I'm not a scientist... I don't get what you mean. Attack: 1. How Is Mercury so Dense. This is a problem. Mercury couldn't be so dense from gradual process. Tell me, why and how it got so dense. 2. You still haven't answered: If Evolution is true, then life had to come from rock and other non-living things. How did it come to be? Abiogenesis IS closely related to Evolution. Evolutions starts out from no life. 3. can you clarify your views and your beliefs in Evolution? There are many different forms of it. 4. Natural selection is an extremely inefficient method of spreading traits in populations unless a trait has an extremely high selection coefficient. can explain then how it worked? This is a good debate so far, you are a tough debater and I appreciate it. sources: http://www.evolutionnews.org... https://answersingenesis.org...