Mistavega is the one epic omnipotent ruler of ownage.

Before I begin I must make one thing abundantly clear to the humble audience as I don't want to be automatically disqualified for conduct. I have a condition known as "coprolalia", which basically makes me say, or type malicious hateful remarks, But involuntarily of course. I will try my utmost hardest to edit these remarks, but in my editing most of the time I make more uncontrolled offensive remarks. Under this handicap I ask the audience to disregard all of my offensive conduct as irrelevant. Thank you for your understanding, for more information click the wiki link, imbeciles. http://en.wikipedia.org... I flip the bird to my opponent, flip the bird to the judges and assume a posterless position with my hands down, much like Anderson slvia vs. Forrest griffin, because in the end the judges aren't going to matter, because I'm wining this convincingly in a KO fashion. This isn't competition at all. Firstly, I'd like to counter rebut all of my opponents half butt poorly thought out arguments, then reinforce the position of me being "the one omnipotent ruler of ownage in the modern gaming civilization" in my own arguments. MY opponents arguments are as follows: 1) My opponent is not mentioned in Google under his title 2) My opponent has a very unimpressive record on here. My opponents arguments are fundamentally flawed. My sad pathetic uncivilized chess-playing Neanderthal opponent has grossly taking out of context of what I meant by " the epic omnipotent ruler of ownage." When I stated the position of being the epic omnipotent ruler of ownage, I was talking about being so in the gaming civilization. When I say gaming civilization I don't mean a literal civilization I mean a large community of people who play video games. If you refer to the original thread that started the debate, which theme was centered around gaming, you can clearly see I was talking about being the epic omnipotent ruler of ownage of the modern gaming civilization, which is the modern gaming community. Referal to the original thread: http://www.debate.org... For one of two reasons my opponent has mislead the audience. Reason one he intended to purposefully mislead the humble audience by using Bill O'Rielly type tactics, by using half truth, mixed with fallacious fabricated lies to persuade the audience in his personal opinion. Reason two would be my opponent is obviously illiterate in reading comprehension. That reason alone should be reason enough for me to win by default. "1) my opponent is not mentioned in google " MY opponent did not google my title correctly. If he did he would of came up with 25,000, as displayed by the bottom link. http://www.google.com...= "2) My opponent has a very unimpressive record on here." There is absolutely no correlation between me being the omnipotent ruler of ownage of the modern gaming community and my record on debateorg, so this argument in its entirety is completely and utterly irrelevant. It should be disregarded and forgot about like a putrid diaper thrown in a trash receptacle. Round 2 I'll establish why I'm the omnipotent ruler of ownage of the modern gaming community. This took longer then anticipated and I'm pressed for time, off to work I go.