Socialism is the most logical and rational form of economics.

A- The Argument from Revelation Oh. I didn't know that the only way to explain predictions was to attribute them to god. We can predict the exact course of the revolution of the Earth to within mere centimeters and you don' see me going around saying the only way to predict that is if god told me. Saying that god is the only explanation is intellectually lazy at best. B-The argument from Miracles or Testimony " Jesus, unlike Penn and Teller, did things that were not and are not physically possible" The reports of the alleged miracles of Jesus were written decades after his death. You could say that Penn and Teller shooting each other and allegedly catching the bullets in their mouths is humanly impossible. But even if they did this and a group of people wrote, decades after their death, that their tricks were divinely inspired you would not expect anyone to believe you would you? Please bring evidence that Jesus actually did miracles. And a collection of books written decades after his death does not count as external evidence. And yes I said that space would not allow me to provide all the reasons people believe in god and I am right about that. However, I should have also said that if you would like to bring any arguments for the existence of god I will be happy to disprove them. After all, the burden of evidence is on you. Moral Argument I don't know if you recognize the truth of evolution or not. I'm actually debating someone right now who tries to deny the validity of macro evolution. Evolution is the great creator of morality. As social animals our ancestors needed to get along with each other. The chimps who could get along with their peers had a greater chance of finding a mate to reproduce with. So, slowly but surely more of the chimps who didn't kill others reproduced versus the ones who could not get along with others. Obviosely, there are still those who believe in killing, just look at the military or sociopaths, but those have other explanations. Your moral arguments again brings no external evidence for the existence of a god. And it' kind of funny. I assume that you are a Christian and your argument simply points to an author of morality. Even if your argument made sense, why does it not point to the Muslim god or the Hindu god. You said that all cultures agree on the same basic principles. Just something to think about. Creation This is the funniest argument. Supernaturalists say that everything needs a cause and that cause is god but when questioned about god's cause, they say that he's an exception. If that is so then your axiom that everything needs a cause falls apart. Impossibility of Disproving Existence You say it is impossible to disprove the existence of your deity. However, you make dozens of claims(noah's ark, resurection, ascension into heaven) and since you have yet to prove these assertions true, I have the right not to take their truth on blind faith. If you were to debate that I am not the creator and governor of the universe, according to your argument, you cannot disprove me regardless of all the evidence pointing to the negative. In that case why are you not agnostic in regard to my alleged holiness? However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT) All obey the holy word of god!