Resolved: Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) confirm common ancestry (evidence for evolution)

Ok I am sorry to spoil it, as in I do not know a lot on Endogenous Retroviruses. However I can say that I am quite obvious that people would come to think that DNA is similar in great apes than it is in us. This is so obvious when people are blinded from the existence from a powerful God this result is almost impossible to miss. I see to reason to think evolution has happened. The best proof an evolutionist has is the fossil record, with out that then they are ruined. With no base to work off they can not take off. And the fact that Peter in the Bible said that the Golden Age would be long forgotten about as a prophecy came true. The seminar that a Great global flood happened would make such a result as from today. What can people expect when the Godden Age is forgotten about? The only solution is to think Earth must be 4 odd billion years old and that death has crept all over the Earth for at least 3.3 billion years. That would be the only other way to say that God does not exist. The meteorite (Mexico) may as well not even happen. But neither should have the flood in your thinking scheme. We share many DNA with many creatures and plants; we share 50 - 60% of DNA with a banana. You would say we a related somewhere down the line (which does not even connect) that we are a distant relative of the banana. Correct? I hope you are aware that human beings are more able than apes. That DNA is so hard and so coded that no new information can crack its way in. Apes have a completely different mind set to ours. A dolphins brain is larger than ours. Yet they are intelligent for a creature what gives human beings that edge? It is the spirit with in us. This allows us as humans to have the knowledge of time. Have morals and to speak language. How did language evolve? No animal can speak and that is one reason why we are different to animals. No evolutionist has ever figured this out. All attempts to make a chimp speak have failed. Evolutionists have no explanation for the origin of the human language. Did we meteor under our breaths in till "Yes alright I can speak, sweeeet, Isn't this awesome, this is awesome." (Afterwards takes out a cigarette are lights it, in a Family Guy kind of fashion.) Sorry I will not fall for evolution. The Bible tells us why we can speak many languages "as God had to "confuse" the common language being used in Babel after the flood, in order to force people to spread out around the world as He wanted." (Not from the Bible) This was only a slight modification in language speaking, as the same meanings are still used among different language and we can, with medium effort learn new languages. When a animal simply can not. Only a parrot. The record number of words spoken by a parrot is like 800. But no most can not even say one word. How does a asexual creature for example worm evolve/ Why would a creature forget or abandon such a effective and easy way to reproduce? Now a creature needs to find a mate. This just does not make sense. Despite that you can just say "That is what evolution has done" Partly the reason why this topic is so difficult to destroy. Sex is very complex with in the body. Most animals breed and meet and a typical place or time. To understand how this and considering the existence of sperm and eggs is simply impossible. The associated machinery which must be used in sex, defies the imagination. The oldest fossils found were fully formed for any creature and the complexity does not seem to change from today's creatures. The "Cambrian Explosion" which gave way for complexity of most major groups of animals "There is no evidence of evolution from simpler forms." No I too have not heard of that. It just happened...Again. There are no middle class fossils. It would only be an opinion to say which one is worse or which creature would win in a fight. When evolution should say "there are worse creatures than other creatures" No there is not. All animals have their own way of living. And in no amount of time will conclude there being a match of two different species. If you find a new species tomorrow it will only be a new find. Not a middle form otherwise you and your other team of evolutionists can be deciding which creature is worse or in the middle of this creature degustation. I simply have better thing to do my self. So what do you need to find? A creature half of one animal and half of another animal. Trust me I have thought hard over this. Let's say a dog. Would you say this dog is apart of a died out creature and therefore we are unable to suggest what it has formed/evolved from? No I say! I think that dogs may have came from wolfs. Evermore wolfs and dogs are quite alike and there is no other creature on the planet which says "Look there is a creature which is like a wolf/dog and like another mammal." (Small bear) We may not see the future but we can look into the past. And say no other creature has come from a dog or wolf. When you look the tree of life (evolutionary tree) you will see a rabbit then follow the branch up and look a wolf. The only thing we all have in common is that we are all alive and well. So they thought "We're just stick it on a tree and say we are all related because we all have blood." How about not. In the Bible it says the life is in the blood, yeah you know what I am saying. This whole evolutionary tree is a scam. To make a tree like this to work would need to be so intensely detailed. That you eyes would make one animal merge into the next, having no gapes. As the branches do not actually link up the animals at all. They may as well not be there. This whole evolution thing is a joke. The only reason why evolutionists think evolution happens is because the amount of creatures there are. And that is it. The only reason is based on Gods grand, genius. Incredible unimaginable and divers universe God has offered Earth. You choose you to say no to that! Thank you.