Reality is the only true answer to everything not divine belief

Thank you for this intriguing debate. When looking at my opponents first argument, it is quite clear that the burden of proof thus falls to Pro as his job within the round is to prove that reality answer all questions without fallacies and my job as con to prove that not all questions can be answered using logic. Since my opponent failed to offer any definitions, I take it up to my self to provide the definitions that will be used through out the round. Reality: resemblance to what is real. (http://dictionary.reference.com...) Everything: all that exists (http://www.merriam-webster.com...) true: fully realized or fulfilled (http://www.merriam-webster.com...) I will base my arguments on my definitions as well as some my opponents questions. Why do bad things happen? This question was answered by http://ati.iblp.org... in stating that the "Scripture teaches us that "all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose" (Romans 8:28; see also Jeremiah 29:11). Searching for God's answers and learning to view "bad things" as "good things in disguise" are disciplines that God wants His children to develop as they mature spiritually. " Who was the first person? My opponent answer this question but does not tell us why this is a logical fallacy nor does he provide us with an answer that doesn't contradict what reality is defined by. What is a miracle? A surprising and welcome event that is not explicable by natural or scientific laws and is considered to be divine. (http://www.google.com...) if this definition is true, then my opponents entire argument is thus dismissed as i have proved that reality does not answer all questions and thus cannot be the only true answer to everything. On to my opponent's argument "Contention # 1 - Nothing happens due to divine intervention because it refutes natural laws. Nothing that has or will happen cannot be explained via natural laws." My question is... how was the world created? If my opponent is unable to answer this question without logical fallacies, then my opponent has contradicted himself and thus must loss the round. "Contention # 2 - In order to answer a question truthfully one must first accept and understand reality and debunk myths." If we follow my definition of truth --the only definition in this round-- then we must see that an answer cannot be true unless it is faced with not contradiction. In this world, there is always a contradiction to all question, meaning that all question cannot never be truly true thus, different answers can only be answered using different ways or techniques. Reality cannot be the only answer because reality is defined in multiple way. Divine belief is only one of this ways. "Contention # 3 - Reality is using your five senses, an instrument to expand your senses (I.e telescope), and scientific modeling. Divine intervention cannot explain anything whatsoever." Reality is using different techniques to answer a question. One way being divine believes. What is real or fake is only defined by ones personal view on reality. "Contention # 4 - If you answer anything without accepting reality as the basis you are committing a logical fallacy and essentially are telling a "misguided truth"." All question has a logical fallacy and depending on ones personal view, divine belief is the most logical way to answer a question. In conclusion, Reality cannot be the only way to answer a question because reality, just like divine believe, is one of multiple ways to truly answer a question. and can only