Atheism

Give some observed evidence of these particles producing universes then! These particles go out of existence anyway so pro is either being deceptive or special pleading. How do we know these particles are uncaused? Because we don't know what causes them! Just because we don't know doesn't mean their uncaused. Particle of the gaps! The fossil record shows nothing! There just bones you cannot prove the bones had kids. Many bones are just incomplete and fossilization is rare. So its an invalid assumption to say one creature evolved into another(because one like it may existed with it) or say that the creature isn't a life form that exists now(since they're incomplete and rare) Fossils show that creatures are just variations. We have fish fossils then we have land fossils. Are you tellin me that the fish gave birth to land creature? They use to say we share 99% of our DNA with CHimps, then somewhere between 98-99% now 96%. There is a diminishing evidence here. Some biologist say we share a lot of DNA with the worm and banana.[1][2] Yeah the worm must of birthed a human. Maybe the Ford and the Toyota all evolved from a skateboard after all they share a lot of similarities. We share 70% of our body with the ocean. Since we ae 70% water, maybe the ocean birthed a man? NO we have a common designer We don't have a tail in embryo stage. Its our feet that are hunched up. And the "gills" are just folds in the neck because the embryo's head is hunched up to. Much like if you put your neck down you will have folds in your neck. If morality is a result of intellect if someones intellect is different the morals are different. You say the concept can be defined then say it cannot. WHAT? Many people believed the earth was round it out numbered the flat earthers. We know that the majority a lot of times cannot be wrong because many philophers had to rethink concepts to appeal to the majority. Contention 1 The atheist ran! He didnt give any proof or evidence that atheism is accurate or correct. If atheism needs no proof then its just a faith. So in the next round without evading or asking me a question give some valid proof and evidence that atheism is accurate and correct. Contention 2 Why do you state he cannot at the same time. Do you have proof he cannot at the same time? In quantum physics a particle can exist and not exist at the same time, this is known as a Quantum superposition[3]. So if God is all knowing and the creator of physics therefore he could create a quantum superposition of a rock that he cannot lift and can lift at the same time. Contention 3 Pro assumes that the decay rates are constant. Which is the typical evolutionist assumption. Carbon dating doesn't date up to a billion or even a million. The expansion shows nothing. If the planets were expanding for 12 billion years or even 4 billion years the planets wouldn't be at the right place to sustain life. Pro then says since scientists think YEC is wrong it is. Well there are many scientists who accept young earth and reject evolution[4][5]. The reason why many scientists want to think the earth is 4 billion years old is because they hate God and are sinners. [1]http://news.bbc.co.uk... [2]http://www.information-facts.com... [3]http://en.wikipedia.org... [4]http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org... [5]http://creation.com...