There exists a scientific miracle in the Qur'an [#2]

This is not a forum discussion. Pro has to either accept the obligatory regulations or ask me to change them in the comment section as specified by R7.1- On PlagiarismAnti-plagiarism is commonly accepted as a DDO standard. Even if Pro doesn't want to follow the obligatory regulations, he must follow such a standard to avoid being penalized by voters. I have to tell everyone that Pro plagiarized large portions of his text without any references by copying it exactly from Answering-Christianity. com. Pro's text is a total of 3834 characters. Pro plagiarized 1526 characters from Answering Christianity, and that made up 1526/3834 (almost 40%) of the text he used. You can visit this page and find in the bottom of the gray rectangle what Pro presented as his expanding universe claim: . http://www.answering-christianity.com...2- On providing more than one miracle-claimI clearly specified that Pro must only provide one miracle-claim or else he receives a seven-point loss, and I emphasized on the point that this doesn't mean "at least one" but "only one. "R4- Pro is only allowed to provide and defend one scientific miracle-claim throughout the whole debate. Pro is not allowed to provide more than one miracle-claim. .. In case Pro violates this rule, he/she automatically receives a seven-point loss. Pro, however, adopted the snake-oil merchant strategy of throwing many "snake-oil advantages,", given that one advantage would be easily refuted and tossed aside. He used: Qur'an as linguistic miracle, expanding universe miracle, baby gender miracle, relative time miracle, and the arithmetic miracle. I will not address the last two miracle-claims due to space restrictions. Even if I allowed this to be a 10,000 characters debate, Pro would have filled his space with many miracle-claims to the degree that I wouldn't be able to respond to everything he presents. Ergo, why I demanded only one miracle-claim. 3- Qur'an as a linguistic miracle? Pro's argument can be summarized as. .. .. P1- Arabic literature is composed of poetry and prose and in-between subforms. P2- Qur'an is neither poetry, prose or an in-between subform. [False premise - Qur'an is chanted prose(hymns) and that kind of prose has unique rhymes and structures such as in the Hindu Vedas]P3- Qur'an is the greatest work of Arabic literature because nothing could be like it or better. [Baseless assertion - subjective opinion]Conclusion: Qur'an is a miracle. [Conclusion doesn't follow premises - Non sequitur logical fallacy]You don't have to be a logician to realize that even if we grant all the three premises, there is no way in logic to reach the deduction that the "Qur'an is a miracle. " It can be man-made and still be the best and most unique work of Arabic literature. Hence, the whole argument is a textbook example of a non-sequitur fallacy and a "God did it" argument.4- Expanding universe miracle? The whole text Pro provided here was stolen from Answering Christianity(non-trusted source), even when the article was obviously written by someone playing language tricks on non-Arab Muslims. As a native Arabic speaker, I can easily expose it. It is important to note that classic Arabic and Modern Standard Arabic are very similar. According to Bin Muqbil (2006), the grammatical syntax and morphology has NOT been changed between MSA and CA[1]. In the Arab world, we use the same word "Fos7a" to both languages due to the symmetry. Answering Christianity says, ". .. the Arabic Word used by Allah Almighty is MOUSI'OONA (موسعون expanding) in Noble Verse 51:47, which is a verb of the noun WAASI'A (واسع vast). MOUSI'OONA is clearly a verb that refers to a continuing expansion. .. "Rebuttal: (1) The word Wassi'a (vast) is not a noun. It is obviously an adjective to every Arabic and English reader, so AC loses its credibility. (2) The Qur'an doesn't use "Mousi'oona" (Expanding). It's "L-Mousi'ona" which is a variation of "Al-Mousi'oona" (Expanders) but with a shortened prefix due to its grammatical position. The "Al-" prefix in Arabic is the equivalent of saying "The"[2], and "The" can't possibly come before verbs as AC suggests. [3]. (3) Expanders could both be for expanders now or in the past. I have no reason to accept Pro's interpretation. 5- Baby gender miracle? Pro tells us that the Qur'an says males and females are created from Semen, and claims that this is saying that sperms decide the gender of babies. This is a fabrication on Pro's behalf. A scientific miracle (as defined above) should reveal accurate knowledge not ambiguities, and here the Qur'an is making an erroneous statement identically made by Aristotle's theory on embryology[4]. .. . [1] Bin-Muqbil 2006, p. 14[2] en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Al-[3] Arabic for dummies, p. 36[4] Aristotle, De Generatione Animalium, Book II, p. 1148.