The earth is a spherical shape.

As you will see, there is not enough room for all ten rebuttals in this format debate, each topic must be reexplained using the basic senses. They are The only things we know are telling The truth. I will address a few, and ask that pro suggest one or two more from The list, because I would like to provide some proof of a pancake at some period in the debate. Why are all my thes caps? I'm so blazed. The moonA)lunar eclipses The flat earth may not have come up with an explanation as a whole (some theorize a 3rd invisible object in the sky (which could be where this idea originated from), a black sun called Rahu,(1) and civilians have no access to whatever can see the light it gives off as many claims of these bodies exist in the official universe , (this would explain the chemtrails, maybe, there are certain predictable circumstances that it can be seen, in a clear day that is) while others claim it to be a projection, or hologram, which I will get to in part b), but we know through scientific observation that no solid objects can produce a red shadow, such as a blood moon. Also, accounts of lunar eclipses have shown both the sun and moon appearing above the horizon, this is impossible if the earth is directly in between the sun and the. moon(2). With these two observations, it can be logically deduced that the earth does not block the light of the sun on the moon.(1) https://youtu.be...(2) https://youtu.be... B)lunar phasesThis one is a little harder to explain, (and believe, but you have to believe your own eyes on a situation like this) and I gotta admit, it is one thing I myself am still wondering, but, we know some things don't match up with the official story like, it does not spin like all the other celestial bodies in the universe as they claim, we've never seen the other side of it! And the faces wouldn't match up if the sun were not standing still. it's kind of hard to explain, I hope this video helps you understand(3). Recently, many people have recorded what appears to be a refresh line (4)slowly going up the moon, which if you have ever seen a security camera pointed at another screen, you will see a slowly ascending, or descending (depending on if you were in the southern or northern hemisphere) line. This has not been observed anywhere else in nature. If you put two and two together you can safely assume that the moon is not what we are told it is, and we may never fully understand it. Why do you think they have not commercialized flights to the moon by now? When they go back to the moon(lol, if you believe that)(5), we as taxpayers, should demand a live(delayed) camera aimed at earth, available to all taxpayers. Surely you have figured out that the lunar landings we're all a hoax. But that is another debate all together.(3) https://youtu.be...(4) https://youtu.be...(5) https://youtu.be...ShipsShips never go over any curve (which goes against common sense seeing that the natural physics of water is to find and maintain a level surface), they only disapear because they, and everything else follow a few rules of perspective, atmospheric perspective and the law of perspective. As we can barely make out the last mountain in the photo below, it isn't because it is over any curve. Atmospheric perspective is just dense, more thick air, smog, fog, heat, dust, dew, exhaust, anything that hovers close to the flat earth that will eventually, at a distance, block light from coming through all together. This effect is multiplied with distance, meaning it gets a lot thicker very close to the earth, and drops off fairly quickly as altitude is gained. As it is thicker at lower altitudes, an object going away from you will appear to disappear from the bottom up, until it hits the vanishing point. A telescope (8)will bring it back into view, provided it can see through the dense atmosphere, which gets thicker with distance. Any videos, I've seen and proven this, that show boats going over the horizon only lower the camera to below where the waves break. A source of this claim that I couldn't prove did so might sway my opinion. I've yet to see a legitimate, uncut video of this happening though. https://youtu.be... Shadows and Sticks Errortosthenes' experiment depends on this, since the sun is 93 Brazilian miles away as modern astronomers claim, the sun's rays would hit the earth parallel to each other. Errortosthenes also claimed he circumnavigated the earth when he saw elephants in the west(african) and then again in the east(indian). Anyone who uses their eyes at all can see that the sun's rays do not run parallel to each other.(6)Furthermore, the moon is exactly 400x smaller, and 400x closer in relation to the sun! The odds of this happening in a totally random, ever expanding at light speed universe on the planet we humans (the only physical place we have ever been, and can prove exists) live, is astronomical. But it's just a coincidence they say. Right.(6) http://youtu.be...Better sight at higher altitudeI've explained the perspective laws, and how they work. If you were to rise above this thicker air, well it only makes sense that you could see more, because you have eliminated some of this atmosphere from your vision. If you were looking over any curve, objects would gradually lean away from you the further you could see. You would also be overcoming the law of perspective to a degree. Drop a quarter on a football field and stand 50 yards away, you would certainly see it from halfway up the goalposts sooner than standing on the ground. You Never have to look down at the horizon. Ride a plane Ever wondered why plane windows are concave? Concave windows, lenses, and mirrors. Have an effect on things, like a fisheye lens (which is used in most high altitude videos) otherwise known as a go pro camera. The effect actually bends straight lines that aren't centered. This (7)balloon has 2 cameras on it, a gopro, and a regular lens. (I'll let you guess which one is the standard lens, hint : the gopro also bends the earth outward when the horizon is below centered) it is important to notice the difference, because nasa usus the gopro, or fisheye camera a lot. As you will agree, (ruler on the screen) the standard lens shows a truly flat at any altitude horizon. Any cameras showing any slight curvature, has only seen the extent of the sun's rays, explaining time zones. In other words, nighttime. The next argument is actually a proof of mine, as your source states "Planes can travel in a relatively straight line a very long time and not fall off any edges. They can also, theoretically (and some do, though with stops along the way), circle the earth." this is a contradiction. If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off into “outer space;” a pilot wishing to simply maintai.n their altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph, would have to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute! Otherwise, without compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected.(7) https://youtu.be... There are no fixed “East” or “West” points just as there is no fixed “South.” The North central Pole is the only proven fixed point on our flat Earth, with South being all straight lines outwards from the pole, East and West being concentric circles at constant right angles 90 degrees from the pole. A westerly circumnavigation of Earth is thus going around with Polaris continually on your right, while an easterly circumnavigation is going around with Polaris always at your left. You don't actually fly completely around the globe, you fly in seemingly straight lines from fueling station, to fueling station, until you come to the starting point. "Pictures" from space. I will prove that at least one or more of NASA's photos are faked, and it will be assumed, given the circumstances, that all are faked as well, proving nasa an unreliable source. In this comparison, America has over doubled in size. Proof one. Blatant copying and pasting of cloud formations. Proof two. The word "sex" wrote out in cloud formations, really? Proof three. There are several proofs of NASA Photoshop, these are some of the worst, besides the fact that there are no satellites where there would be thousands, an actual photo of earth should look more like this: proof four. NaSA admits that most if not all of their "photos" of earth are in fact composites put together in Photoshop, since this can also be done on a flat earth with a high altitude plane, it does not prove a spherical earth.proof fiveA little off topic as it doesn't involve earth, but still has to do with NASA's"photos". The recent "picture of pluto is my favorite. At places of comparable latitude North and South, dawn and dusk happen very differently than they would on a spinning ball, but precisely how they should on a flat Earth. In the North dawn and dusk come slowly and last far longer than in the South where they come and go very quickly. Certain places in the North twilight can last for over an hour while at comparable Southern latitudes within a few minutes the sunlight completely disappears. This is inexplicable on a uniformly spinning, wobbling ball Earth but is exactly what is expected on a flat Earth with the Sun traveling faster, wider circles over the South and slower, narrower circles over the North. Guess what map (9) the official atlas creaters use? My map. Go to the AE map and scroll far right. USGS it is also represented on the United nations flag and symbol. Anonymous uses the same flag but a global earth. Pitting globalists against anti-globalist. Each is divided into 33 sections. I'll let you research the number 33 and it's symbology and numerological significance.(9) https://en.m.wikipedia.org...