Earth is a spinning ball.

Thanks for accepting, I ask that you approach this information with unbiased eyes, actually try to forget everything you've learned at this point. The first day of school we learned a few things, basic math, like one plus one equals two, our ABCs, and the supposed fact that the earth is a globe. Talk about indoctrination. The first two are fairly elementary, but have you ever seen the earth from the moon? The teachers never saw the Earth from the moon, their bosses never saw it. In this debate I will prove that NASA has, beyond a shadow of a doubt, lied to us at least one time, one time is all it takes because if they would lie to us once they would lie to us about a lot of other things. 1.Photos I will prove that at least one or more of NASA's photos are faked, and it will be assumed, given the circumstances, that all are faked as well. There are no actual photos of Earth in existence. There are a few composites, (which can be done from high altitude flights from a plane on a flat earth) a painting or two, and some cgi. With the thousands of satellites out there, shouldn't there be hundreds or thousands of them by now. They supposedly had the technology to do it in the 60's! In this comparison, America has over doubled in size. Proof one.(1) Blatant copying and pasting of cloud formations. Proof two.(2) The word "sex" in cloud formations, really? My 8 year old brought this home on the cover of her dictionary. What really got to me was the 3 sixes at the bottom of this inverted "photograph" Proof three.(3) I suppose it could happen after all there must be photographs somewhere on the internet of full words in clouds. Wait, I found one! (4) I'm sorry, that was uncalled for. NASA claims they do have a hand full of actual photos of earth, but not one of them show a trace of any of the thousands of satellites said to be in orbit at varying heights around the earth.(5) You would think, that with that many giant pieces of aluminum, baler wire, duct tape, and tinfoil flying around the world, some of them would reflect some light back to the camera with the sun at the cameras back. How many real pictures of these satellites do we have? Close to none, if any.Recent photos of pluto show that NASA at least has a sense of humor about lying to us.(6)In this photo, earth is relatively small, considering earth is 4 Times bigger than the moon. Common sense says if he were actually on the moon, the earth would appear 4 times bigger than the moon appears from earth. Compare that picture with the recent "video" of earth spinning with the moon and you'll notice The earth has multiplied several hundred times in size! (8) 2. The iss The videos taken from the ISS are probably a high altitude plane with a fisheye lens video on a green screen, with parts of the craft posed in front of it. While this in itself is not impossible to prove, (again, where are the other thousands of satellites circling the earth?) the most damming evidence is the fake videos from inside and around the iss, when humans get in the picture. Multiple bubbles seem to come out from places. (9) (10) Are they actually in a giant pool?(11) don't worry about that toolbox, the scuba divers will pick it up off the green screen after the show. Note how it drops to a certain point and stops, also note someone forgot to spin the earth.(12). And little slip ups like saying you are filming in the US...(13) you can see how the other two give him a "hey, that wasn't in the script!" look. Lack of curvature This video (14)was shot using a fisheye lens, and a regular lens. Which doesn't show any curvature.. Even close to the red bull dive cameras same height, which shows abnormal amounts of curvature, with the earth even curving outward at some points in the video. Ok maybe that isn't lying only misinterpretation. The whistle blowers I'll just let them speak for themselves.(15)(16)I could go on, but if like to hear from con at this point. I think I have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that your only proof of a spherical earth (NASA) has been shown to be unreliable and rebutted. (1) http://www.debate.org... (2) http://www.debate.org... (3) http://www.debate.org... (4) http://www.debate.org... (5) http://www.windows2universe.org... (6) http://www.debate.org... (7) http://www.debate.org... (8) http://www.nasa.gov... (9) http://www.wildheretic.com... (10) http://www.wildheretic.com... (11) http://arstechnica.com... (12) https://youtu.be... (13) https://youtu.be... (14)https://youtu.be... (15) https://youtu.be... (16) https://youtu.be...