We are thee most sinful generation since the great flood.

So may I ask a question? Are you a Christian? Many of the things you say seem to be from the perspective of someone who is at the very least agnostic, though you also make claims of being a believer in a somewhat literal Biblical history.You give a formula with some variables on why each generation is more sinful than the last, but you don't go past that. You don't plug in information, you expect the formula to sit there and be some rock hard evidence that you are right. If you could do the mat for me on your next round, I'd appreciate it. Next, you mention that it seems like it would take about 6,000 years to blow up. I am assuming you mean for humanity's holiness level to collapse into utter sin. You don't really say why other than "it seems like", and even if it did take 6,000 years for the last collapse of humanity because of being sinful, only 4,300 years have past since the flood. Check the Answers In Genesis website I had from the last round. You go on to list why the people during the flood were so sinful, although you don't seem to be all too sure of what they did besides not worship the Big G. Maybe they molested, were poor, ate people (where do you get this one from?), fought some wars, murdered, and raped, but maybe they didn't? In fact, I would like for you to point me towards a generation that didn't have a number of those things (except maybe the cannibalism). Your next sentence seems to be in contradiction to what you just said. The people that were flooded murdered people and that is why they were drowned! Except for the fact that apparently "murder is not even that bad". Well, the people were flooded because they had wars... Except God supported wars. Oops. There is also the false equivalency of saying that murder isn't that bad because God supported wars. While war may not be the optimal situation, I think we can all agree that soldiers are not murderers. #1: Many of the colonists in early America didn't even go to church. There had to be a religious movement in the early days of America for people to reconnect with God.#2: The last generation also had access to porn.#3: I can't dispute number three, but still you guys have 78.4% of the population.#4: I'm not sure what number four means in accordance to sin but okay.#5: Saying the use of lust has risen is very vague and not helpful for conversation. What does this mean? More people masturbate? More people want to have sex? #6: Every generation has tried to push the envelope to mess with the generation before. #7: Like dropping an f-bomb or using God's name in vain? Swearing, in a sinful context, is vague and also not helpful. #8: What? Do you have any examples for the class?#9: While suicide rates are rising, they are not the highest they have ever been. According to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, 1984-1989 had a higher suicide rate than 2011, which was 12.3. This is a sad trend to see, but if you look closely, we aren't the worst generation for it.*My job isn't to come up with sources for you. If you didn't find this information out of the whims of your imagination, then put a source.So what I get from your last paragraph was "Well the medieval times were kind of really terrible to live in with a lot of murders and wars God may or may not be okay with, but at least they let the church rule them." You round up this statement of questionable moral status with a huge no-true-Scotsman fallacy and an attempt to scare us out of a separation of church and state. If you want to debate the separation of church and state then I would be interested in that topic, but we are talking about the sinful nature of this generation. One of the questions I asked in the second round is "What is sin?" Apparently this question is unimportant to you, but I think it needs an answer. When using a book that can be used to justify most positions, you must explain why your justification is the most legit one.Thanks, and I await your response.