How to Solve Every "Big Issue" in One Year.

I've switched to smaller text.0. EMP range can be tweaked based on the amount of energy one is fed.The EMP's, once again, are not targeting civilian life. They are only for established systems that may hinder this one.STUXNET is being used to hijack the Earth's energy reserves. It is not a monitoring device. The plan to use EMP's for "all other tech" refers to all other tech that threatens an open-source world(finance and militia)1.There are several mines around the world being run autonomously today. The issue, as you stated, is the threat they pose to the workforce. Therefore, many of these "automatic" mines aren't really automated to repair themselves, sort through the materials mined, or log how MUCH they mine.In our program, these mines will be automated to the fullest extent, even in separating and storing the materials. Even in repairing themselves and monitoring how much they mine.Distinguishing between different rare metals and minerals requires refined detection, of which most high powered sensors have the ability for.2 & 3."The renewable farms have to be built first"No. I have all the oil, coal, and nuclear energy to build as many farms as I need.4.The EMP's will be detonated simultaneously so that the communications grid used by "nation defense" in every nation goes dark. They won't be able to communicate the threat in the first place.The EMP's can wipeout the grid in seconds. The submarines can be hijacked via STUXNET.5. The volunteers hepling program the autonomous systems and infrastructures will not ask for payment. Any payment they recieve would be useless upon completing the project, since everything would be free and accessable by default. 6.STUXNET controls all nuclear systems and may very well disable them.War threats are of no consequence. This program is not being carried out by America or any other private business and they will not be awarded credit for the system update.I also fail to see the threat of wiping out every desert. Is there any civilization anywhere that wouldn't benefit from this system?7.Money, or rather profitable gain, does not cause incentive for creativity.In most cases, it actually hinders the creative process. I can prove this with studies funded by the Federal Reserve, but I'll let you do your own research."That's the problem with your society. No one has [an incentive] to do anything anymore." Precisely. Nobody is forced to do anything anymore. So is my system totalitarian or not?"If you are prepared for hundreds of years of energy, then no one will bother going to school in the meantime since they don't even have to work, and even if they get a basic education, who'll bother going to university, and who'll run the universities?"You have an interesting view of universities in terms of what they provide and why people attend them. They are not for turning learners into workers. Those are training centers and they aim to specialize individuals rather than generalize them. Specialization is offensive and puts a serious limit on what the brain is capable of learning. Unfortunately many government approved training centers are being advertised as "Universities". In our system, universities will have unlimited resources at their disposal, unhindered creative drive, and will not rely on accreditation. If you don't like University #35, then try out University #36. Education will be open-source and not totalitarian, as it is under today's system."It ends up like Idiocracy's commercially stupid population."I just watched this film for the purpose of the debate. Idiocracy shows a world where technology is somehow stupider than the civilization using it. My system uses only the best technology. This movie also has a part where the government finds the world's smartest man to solve all their technical problems, instead of relying on voting. Only then do things start to improve for the population.My system eliminates commercialization and the workforce both. "We weren't made by anyone, so we decide our own purpose and destiny."The fact that we exist means that we were in fact made.Whether we were made by divinity or nature, or whether these creators are one and the same, our bodies and minds have certain rules they must obey. If you do not get enough energy, you will die. There is not much of a decision there."And soylent green will never taste as good as normal food. It's an end to pleasure."Overstimulation makes the brain fire neurons and neurotransmitters more often, causing immunity and lowered response intensity. In short, overstimulation = inhibited pleasure. Like living off of food and hoping to get pleasure from it after doing it 3 times a day, every day, for 10 years.A Soylent diet not only assures an optimum daily intake of energy on an individual level, it allows people to only eat foods they take PLEASURE in and only as often as they want.9.For the 3rd time, the EMP's will not be used against civilian homes.The structure of the homes is a very serious problem. All humans need a senes of safety. It is one of the foremost preliminary steps in satisfying Maslow's pyramid.11.A black market wouldn't be very popular if it's slogan was ""We'll take out thoes pesky sensors so you have to navigate your car yourself". This system initiates no force once it has been programmed. The only force being used is to take the resources and energy needed for a worldwide access system, where anything can be mined, constructed, shipped, repaired, updated, or replaced on a whim.People won't be forced to have sensors in their vehicles, but this is a service very few would turn down.12.Nobody is making things for computers. Computers are making things for us.I've said 3 times now that there is no human labor force, and there is no force of human labor.Machines DO work for free and there's no task done by humans that machines cannot do faster, smarter, and with more accuracy. Including triple-bypass surgery.This entire system is automated, from the mining of resources, to the assembly, to the shipping, to the waste management and recycling.The only jobs left are the ones that require human creativity, such as software updates, personalization, product design, etc;Overall:I didn't start this debate to sulk over the purpose of live in a system that provides everything to everyone.On one side, you debate the feasability of the program, whether it's national defense, lack of resources, or shipping problems.On the other side, you attack the productivity of mankind in this system once it has been accomplished, whether it's creativity, incentive to repair the system, etc. I'd like to address these two concerns more at length in a futher debate, perhaps someting along the lines of "Dystopia or Utopia?". I'm confident that I can convince you not only the feasability of this program, but the positive effect it would have on the global population. I also apologize if I ever came off as condescending or insulting. I respect that you know enough about politics and technology to debate me on this.