Killing Prostitutes is not a "murder"; it is social cleansing activism.

Hello, barnettcaleb1. Welcome to this enjoyable debate where we discuss the issue of serial killing prostitutes. Let us begin. You mentioned "Sex is beautiful", which is merely your subjective evaluation of sexual acts. To follow your logic you used in your contention, you would also agree that rape is beautiful too, because rape intrinsically involves sex as its core component. The truth, in contract with your poorly thought-out premise claiming "Sex is beautiful", is that there may be some types of sex that some people may or may not find beautiful. There are people who view sex entirely as something other than beautiful; and there are some people who view sex as beautiful in some form, but not so in some other forms. If you are serious about the importance of wording when engaging in a debate, please stick to your principle regarding the matter. It is a joyful agreement to witness that you and I view prostitution as immoral and amoral. However, you have not overcome your inner hypocrisy and outer pretense that I exactly pointed out in my argument. You would lie or pretend as much as you want to by saying you "believe" prostitutes are equal to everybody, including you. The truth, however, is that you regard yourself superior to those prostitutes. The evidence for this abounds : you don't want the job prostitutes do; you would not recommend prostitution as a viable job option to anyone you know; you will be offended deeply if someone even offered you or your loved one to work in the business as one, and most glaringly, you agreed already that you view prostitution is "amoral and immoral". Once you discard your lies, pretenses and hypocrisy about how you really think about prostitutes, and get honest with yourself and with me on the issue, we can progress this debate in a much more constructive way. You argued that the killing of a person is also amoral and immoral. That's a complete falsehood. Just like sex, some forms of which are acceptable while some other forms are not, killing also contains at least two sides. Killing itself has and allows no judgment. It never does, since it is only an act. What may vary is the interpretation, aka value judgment with regard to such acts. You present the Holocaust as an example as to why killing is bad, but have you asked people who are suffering and getting massacred from jews in Israel about that? Do you seriously think the Palestinians would not approve of the complete annihilation of all the jews from the face of the earth? My point is as follows: Killing may be considered good or bad based on the motive(aka purpose) and the effect. In this case, killing prostitutes for the purpose of removing garbage from the world in order to make our places a bit cleaner both fulfills the motive and the effect in an honourable manner. We want the world to be cleaner with less trash and better with less people creatures who do evil things. Killing prostitutes achieves successfully our ideals. It must not be on us to wait for the world to magically become a cleaner, better place overnight; we must act in order to make the world that way. For that, killing prostitutes is a meaningful first step.