Who has it worse? Men (For) or Women (Against)

"My opponent has copied most of his argument from a YouTube video. YouTube is not exactly a reliable source of information." The reason why I linked it to his YouTube video is because he lists the sources. "The YouTube video is at the bottom of my opponents argument on round 1 and it is narrated by a very biased man. Listen to the man and you will hear the underlying tones." Just because he sounds serious it doesn't mean he's biased. "Secondly, it is against the law to rape a woman because rape is against the law. I think that's pretty obvious." You said, "How many women will have to be raped before we actually start taking this problem seriously?". you imply that people don't take it seriously if a woman gets raped, presumably the law too. But yes I know it is against the law, there's nowhere I said it wasn't. "Then my opponent throws around three points that have little relevance to the fact that a woman in America gets raped every two minutes. 1. Not all rapes get reported. 2. Not all rapes reported are proven to be true. 3. Rape could mean touching a woman inappropriately." I said this because people don't know how many rapes actually happened and the real frequency could be longer (taking into account that all undetermined cases could be assumed true, or they could be assumed false to create a realistic statistic). "I am pretty sure by now that this is just some dumb idea you got off of Dr. Shaym." Dumb idea? "Firstly not all rapes do get reported which means that actually, the 2-minute time lapse should actually be shorter. Not all rapes reported are proven to be true. Most rapes that are reported are hard to prove. I know what rape is, I am not an extremist feminist." You've just repeated what I said. "Then my opponent practically quotes what Dr. Shaym said leaving out all swearing and insults towards Laci. The FBI report was not valid as Dr. Shaym reported." Obviously you can't tell me where I quoted. "Then my opponent refuted me with a rhetoric question and some stats. 1 in 6 men get abused. 1 in 3 women are abused. I think by simple math you can tell which one is worse." Once, men are unwilling to report incidents as much as women because they don't get serious." "My opponent states the wage gap is a myth all because Dr. Shaym probably said that without actually proving it. And the only citation my opponent gives is a YouTube video." Actually, I used to believe in the wage gap, even as an anti-feminist and even when I watched a part of a video by Dr Shaym, I wasn't convinced, because I didn't completely understand what he was saying. However, then I came across Gryffix, a female btw who's even acknowledged the things feminists did in the past to pave her way. She made a video about Onision and she discussed how the wage gap is literally an average of every man's earnings and an average of every woman's earnings. That doesn't consider the work hours, the choices, the risk, or field that they're working in. "So all in all my opponent practically copied most of his argument from a random guy on YouTube who was bashing a feminist." So you also believe that an accused rapist should be presumed guilty. "And my opponent only addressed women in America." You did!!! "Women in China, The Middle Easy, Africa and many other countries have it much worse than men." You totally didn't steal your least paragraph from me and most of your argument from me to make it look like I said something completely different. Sources False Rapes: http://nymag.com... http://dailycaller.com... http://www.mindingthecampus.org... https://en.wikipedia.org... Wage Gap: http://www.huffingtonpost.com... Gryffix video on Onision: