Report Topic Do you believe the Boston Marathon bombing suspects ACTUALLY DID IT "No Evidence"!

I'd like to point that Con is engaging in a deep Gish gallop, not focusing on any point, but throwing many wrong things that I will probably have no chance to fully address in the limited number of space that is allocated for this response. Really?!! is NO or YES a sufficient answer (especially to you since you keep asking me to be clear and specific) ?!! and how come they set up a hearing for someone with serious injuries and is still recovering. By the way the "NO" that you're talking about couldn't be something else like "NAHHH UHHH..MMMHHH" that is coming from the pain he is still suffering since he got injuries to his mouth!! You've clearly never read the transcript of the hearing and apparently not heard that he was even heard. Please, inform yourseld, http://documents.latimes.com... . The fact that hearings are done even when the suspect is still in an hospital is not that extraordinary. What is the alternative ? Do you wait til he can walk ? Wait til he can run ? Wait til he doesn't have any more migraines ? Wait til the bruises are not visible ? What's the threshold ? The threshold has been put when the suspect can respond, and that's what's been done. At ANY point before the hearing started he could have just communicated "No, I can't talk I'm too bad" but he chose not to. Read the transcript, and the questions asked by the court.If you claim that No is in fact Naaah Uh Mmmmh, you're essentially calling the person who did the transcription of the hearing a liar. read the transcript. Tell to James Gibbons, the court reporter, there's his email in the transcript, that he is a liar then. His lie would probably be prosecutable, go on, sue him, prove your assertion. What ? you can't ? Why then should we listen to what you have to say if all you say is speculate and accuse without evidence ? Better?!!" how about canceling Miranda right since it's BETTER THAT IT WASN'T READ FOR HIM AS YOU SAID ?? obviously you start sounding like our government! how about taking out traffic lights so people can get to work fater?!!! Please no one should decide what'S better or worst, THE LAW IS THE LAW. I'm not deciding it's better, you're misinterpreting. Inform yourself on what is miranda rights and why they are said and you'll notice a thing or two. It's not what you think. It's not speculation since the evidence that was provided by the the authorities are very weak from criminal justice point of view and I laughed when I read that they appointed some random public defenders to "defend" the suspect right away without the suspect consent." You know that's exactly the same for any other citizen in the US, right ? If you're accused of a crime and can't defend yourself, you'll be appointed a "random public defender". How horrible. Gimme a break. That's freaking great. What's the alternative ? No defense ? What are you ? A tribe member in a prehistoric society ? I'd like to point out that the investigation doesn't have any duty to report to the public any of the evidence they have on hand. They have that duty during the trial, not before. Every single piece that is public right now is just a piece in a puzzle, there are undoubtedly many more pieces that are not public because if they were the trial would have no chance of convicting the suspect. Who are "them" openly admitted doing it?? The two brothers there is one that is dead already and one that can't communicate ?! Dzokhar can communicate just fine. I'm laughing at you right now What a mature statement. How old are you ? and how did you see the bombs inside those backpacks??? because I just imagined you must be a superman with laser eyes that could see through things easily, is that how you saw the bombs inside that backpacks??!!!! and there was no actual full video that shows the suspects doing what you said, there are separate clips of them with backpacks (didn't see a bomb though!) and other clips without the the backpacks?!! really?? how about showing me just one consistent clip that showing them both clearly putting their backpacks on the floor at the same spot where the bombing had happened??" There's plenty of video evidence, as I said all of it is not publicly released but talked about in the affidavit. I'd like to add that any video evidence that I could provide you'd immediatly say they are tampered with or frauds or whatever, you wouldn't accept them so I don't even see the point. did you see the type of the backpacks before and after ?? they are totally different backpacks!! what a surprise?!!!" Yeah, what a surprise that someone who desperately WANTS them to be different backpacks will find them different.... Not a surprise in fact. The backpack "after" (seen after the bomb explosion) might not even be the backpack where the bomb was.... The suspects might have simply sat their backpack somewhere like we all do when we go to a festival or watch a marathon!! Yeah sure, we all freaking do that.</irony> Yeah no, myself I'd never do that in the middle of a crowd You already jumped to the conclusion assuming that they are the bombers!! even though there is no enough evidence, no conviction and no trial yet. What happened to the simple rule "innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial"?? do you even believe in that ?? " Do you even know how to read ? I already told you they are innocent until proven guilty in the face of the law, and their final guilt will be decided in a trial. But in the face of the evidence, to me, it's just much more likely they are the bombers than not. My opinion of their guilt bear NO FREAKING WEIGHT on their right to be "innocent until proven guilty": They are, no matter what I think. this is one of the basic rule of our freedom rights, did you know that?? so please call them suspects until proven guilty.... Not possible, because no matter their guilt, they are suspects, it's unavoidable. and even after that how many people went to jail and proven innocents years later. All I hope that they don't give him the death penalty so there would be a chance for the truth to uncover one day at least. yeah, keep hoping. How about you stop chasing unicorns and work on what you have instead of hoping for whatever might maybe possibly happen in the future ? I'm like a lot of other people know deep in my heart that they didn't do it based on the evidence provided plus the fact that the suspects had no escape plan in the first place. yeah, deep in your heart, that's really deep[sic] evidence. In order to ascertain criminal guilt we need concrete physical evidence. And we have it. And it shows they are the bombers. What do you mean they had no escape plan ? Escape from what ? The bombing ? The shootout ? What's the problem with no escape plan anyway ? If they wanted to die martyr anyway, no need for escape plan. By the way salute to our american people as 75% of the nation want Tsarnaev tried in nonmilitary court! and please don't waste your time responding and sounding like an FBI agent. Be subjective, don't jump to conclusions and choose your words accordingly ." And I don't want them tried in military court either, what's your point ?And I can see not surprisingly that my intervention has now woven into your conspiracy theory in your mind that I am an undercover FBI agent, that shows anyone the depth of the paranoia that is needed in order to shield this kind of theory from any criticism. All of the nonsense evidence that was provided by the authorities and interrogating a suspect that is still in pain and recovering provide more than enough evidence that this bombing stinks big time. They are nonsense evidence only if you firmly, a priori, want to believe that the bombing is a vast nefarious conspiracy for nefarious purposes by the government. Please think about what kind of evidence we would see if there were absolutely no conspiracy ? If you can't answer that question then your assertion that the present evidence "stinks" is just a belief founded on dogma.