The Bible Teaches the Trinity, namely, God is three Persons

Prayers to JesusI didn't say it was in the bible, but it is a catholic belief to pray to saints [1]. God AND JesusJesus even explicitly says he has a God in John 20:17 "Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God." (ESV) Also, "yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist." (ESV 1 Corinthians 8:6), and "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ!" (ESV 1 Peter 1:3) These show Jesus had a God, and that was the Father.Sharp's rule was made up centuries later and simply does not work like it says. For example "our great King and Queen, Elizabeth" This shows just because and is in there doesn't mean it the same person, and rightfully so because they are not in this example and in the Bible.Concluding, scripture clearly separates God and Jesus thus denying the Trinity.The Trinity violates logicMy opponent compares being God to being Human. This is not valid because God is a single position, for there is only one god, while being human is a characteristic and it is a group.There is no Bible verse that says the Bible is harmonious and has no contradictions, but not everything is in the bible as my opponent has argued in a different debate before "The doctrine of Sola Scriptura, that Christians should base their beliefs on the Scriptures (the Bible) only is not a doctrine that holds up to Biblical scrutiny" [2]. However, "God is not a God of confusion." (1 Corinthians 14:33).Also, everyone has the same formal logic, there are not different formal logic's for different people. This is because Formal logic is about forms "propositions, statements, or assertively used sentences and of deductive arguments" [3]. My opponent keeps mixing up formal logic with logic in general which are two district things. For example my opponent says "based on limited knowledge" which has nothing to do with formal logic, or "beyond the limits of our logic" this is another case of the difference between logic and formal logic.My opponent says my argument is a lack of imagination, this is quite hypocritical because the same could be said about his disagreement about evolution, but he thinks that is right [4].No Man Has Seen God"The Bible often uses the idea of seeing figuratively, to represent enlightenment. (Isaiah 6:10; Jeremiah 5:21; John 9:39-41)" [5]. Also, Moses did not see God, but as said earlier it was an angel as described in Exodus 3:2. "Similarly, when the Bible says that God “spoke to Moses face-to-face,” it means that God conversed with Moses intimately. (Exodus 4:10, 11;33:11)" [5]. John 14:28The definition of Divine is actually from-Webster [6]. However, my opponent has stated before "Christian doctrine should also be derived from Divine Revelation through the Holy Spirit (as given through the prophets, apostles, etc), and the Traditions of the Church which can be supported by logical argument as long as these do not contradict Scripture." [2]. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia under Angels it has a subsection "As divine agents governing the world" [7]. Calling Angels divine does not contradict scripture, and can be supported by logical argument, so my opponent should surely accept angels are divine.My GodGod did give his name in Isaiah 42:8, and it can be read Yahweh, YHWH, Jehovah, etc. However this shows God name is not God.OmniscientYes, Jesus was more than Man, but less than God. Jesus by nature is divine, but so are angels that doesn't mean they are all God. The Bible even states "But will God indeed dwell on the earth? Behold, heaven and the highest heaven cannot contain you; how much less this house that I have built!" (ESV 1 Kings 8:27)UncreatedJesus did not create all things. For example, he did not create the Mona Lisa, or the Great Wall of China. The term all things is more limited than that. Who is the Savior?"Your throne, O God, is forever and ever. The scepter of your kingdom is a scepter of uprightness;" (ESV Psalm 45:6) There is no way to tell if this was about Jesus, if it was. However, since we know God and Jesus are not the same we know it isn't about Jesus.When did the Trinity Come?"THE Bible was completed in the first century C.E. Teachings that led to the development of the Trinity began to be officially formulated in 325 C.E.—more than two centuries later—at a council in the city of Nicaea" [8]. It was not followed by first century Christians, and didn't even become formal until this council. This would seem to show the bible does not teach it.Sources[1] http://www.ourcatholicprayers.com...[2] http://www.debate.org...[3] http://www.britannica.com...[4] http://www.debate.org...[5] http://www.jw.org...[6] http://www.merriam-webster.com...[7] http://www.newadvent.org...[8] http://www.jw.org...[search_id]=20ae9fba-526c-48f0-9354-f02363a5cd36&insight[search_result_index]=2