It is as likely or more likely that 9/11 was an inside job as compared to any other scenario.

So in order to prove that this scenario was as likely as any other scenario I will begin my discrediting the official scenario. I'm going to start with the Pentagon because it is the strangest of them all. I'm going to be using this photo for reference its an easy one. I would have liked one of the photos with people walking in front of it for perspective but I can't seem to find a large one of those. So here goes. http://images.google.com... 1. Like the photo says where is the Plane? Last time I checked steel melts at 2750 degrees Fahrenheit (http://www.chemicalelements.com...). Meanwhile jet fuel burns at what? About 1500 degrees farenhiet? But this is an over simplification. We are not talking about the plane melting in this scenario we are talking about is simply vaporizing and we are not talking about steel we are talking about alloys. How do you manage to vaporize a plane made of steel alloys within seconds and somehow leave the building only looking as if a couple stories collapsed. Not to mention the impact, wouldn't there be at least a wing or something somewhere.... Which brings me to point number two. 2. Where are wings holes.... We have a hole in this building, that on the left side at least, is a complete straight line. Where are the holes where the wings hit on either side....? Did those just happen to fall off and vaporize on the lawn? 3. Perhaps the most disturbing point. Our government, not only has not released a tape of a plane flying onto the pentagon but actually seized the tapes from private businesses that had vantage points of the Pentagon. Source: http://911research.wtc7.net... The only pieces of evidence that have been cited to show a Plane hitting the Pentagon were from Pentagon cameras and the evidence looks like this: http://911research.wtc7.net... Very conclusive. Can someone point me to the plane in this picture....? If a plane had actually hit the pentagon why has our government seized the tapes and has not bothered to show us them despite multiple inquiries? 4. Watch this if you have time. It has some of my ideas and is fairly short. http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk... Scenario 2: The Hijackers 1. The planes... Once again of the four planes that crashed, not a piece of wreckage is shown anywhere for any of them. The official story once again being that they vaporized on impact. 2. We found the passports for four of the hijackers, Ziad Jarrah, Abdulaziz Alomari, Saeed Alghamdi, Satam Al Suqami , in the rubble and on the streets below (http://www.cooperativeresearch.org...). So let me explain this situation briefly. The plane and passengers are vaporized on impact, but the passports, made of paper, are hurdled through the flames and found by a random passersby on the street below unsinged. 4 paper passports survive where 12 tons of jet steel and titanium was vaporized. What....? 3. The FBI report comes to the conclusion that there were 19 hijackers. 4 or 5 per plane. Yet mere days later at least 6 of the suspected hijackers are still alive. (http://news.bbc.co.uk...) And yet, to date, the FBI list hasn't been revised, ummm what? Also we have the issue that not one of the flight manifests actually contained any of the hijackers names or any names of middle eastern origin for that matter. Offense 3: WTC 1 2 & 7 1. Despite popular belief 3 world trade centers actually fell on September 11th. Official report cites fire melted the 3 however all three fell at nearly the speed of free fall. The only feasible scenario for such would be controlled demolition. No building has ever been known to collapse in this way from fire, yet on Sept. 11th three building collapsed.... Care to explain? The official cause of these collapses was that fire melted the supports to the main beams of each tower. Thus the tower collapsed in a pancake fashion 1 floor hitting the next. Unfortunately this would leave the main beams still intact, which it didn't, and would not allow the towers to fall at the speed of free fall. 2. These building were purposefully made to sustain the impacts of an airliner hitting them. "The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it, that was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building could probably sustain multiple impacts of jet liners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door - this intense grid - and the plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting." http://www.youtube.com... http://www.prisonplanet.com... also from the same source: "FACT: BUILDING 7 COLLAPSED IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE TWIN TOWERS YET IT WASN'T HIT BY A PLANE AND HAD MINIMAL FIRE DAMAGE FACT: THE OWNER OF THE WTC COMPLEX, LARRY SILVERSTEIN ADMITTED THAT BUILDING 7 WAS PULLED (THE INDUSTRY TERM FOR DEMOLISHING BY MEANS OF EXPLOSIVES) FACT: FDNY Chief of Safety Reported Bombs Both Within the Towers and on the Planes on 9/11 FACT: CBS News Channel Eyewitness Describes 'Secondary Explosions' in WTC FACT: Rescue Fireman Louie Cacchioli - "We think there was bombs set in the building" FACT: New York Firefighters Discuss Bombs in WTC Towers" 3. Entertaining pools of molten steel are found under the buildings. (http://www.youtube.com...) Jet fuel doesn't burn this hot, nor does a common fire. Most likely scenario would be a bomb, in fact people on the scene at the time felt that there were multiple explosions happening. I think this is probably enough about the 9/11 attacks for now. I have a bit more if you'll be wanting it, but I will save for next round. Now I am going to focus on the probability that our government could do an act like this. First point, our government isn't above acts of violence on its own citizens. Throughout history we have been lied to by the government to lead us in to multiple wars. The Tonkin bay incident is a good example. Better yet is operation northwoods: "Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a 1962 plan by the U.S. Department of Defense to stage acts of simulated or real terrorism on US soil and against U.S. interests and then put the blame of these acts on Cuba in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government of Fidel Castro." http://en.wikipedia.org... Does this sound familiar at all. Second point, George bush is certainly not above lying to us. In fact we counted how many times he lied right after September 11. http://www.news.com.au... Third point, George Bush's family is not above being crooked. In fact his grand father secretly was responsible for helping Hitler during world war II. http://www.guardian.co.uk... Bet that was a new piece of info for most people reading this. =) Fourth point, George Bush's family is friends with the Bin Ladens. Bush actually ordered that investigations on the Laden family to be stopped before Sept. 11 ever occurred. http://www.webcom.com... So while I cannot deny planes flew into the two towers I can state that it was also potentially done with controlled demolitions and the help of Bush's friends.