Is The Old Covenant Binding Upon the Church

I WILL FIRST MAKE MANIFEST MY OPPONENTS FALSE DOCTRINE DIRECTLY QUOTING HIM AND USING ONLY THE WORD OF GOD. Quote #1) "John 1:17 tells us that the Law which was given by Moses was until the grace which came by Jesus Christ." This is biblically inaccurate as there is no "until" in this verse. This one word changes the whole mindset of the verse. one is not "until" the other. furthermore, (John 8:58) says" Jesus said to them, "Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM". Yeshua said He saw "satan fall from heaven like lightning"-(Luke 10:18). With this understanding we see that, yes, grace came by Yeshua, but this grace was issued before He took fleshly form, consider the following scripture: (heb.4:2)- For indeed the gospel was preached to us as well as to them; but the word which they heard did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in those who heard it.--This scripture states the Gospel was preached In the time of Moses(gal.3:8 says this also). I encourage you to read Heb. 4:8 in context to solidify my statement. This is one of many dangerous errors that occur when my opponent adds small words like "until" into scripture. My opponent quotes Luke 16:16 in an attempt to give the impression that the law was until John and then the kingdom of God was preached. Taken out of context this verse gives a wrong impression, my opponent conveniently leaves out the VERY NEXT verse: (Luke 16:17)-" and it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one tittle of the law to fail". I will allow the viewer to draw there own conclusion from this text. Hint: Heaven and earth have not passed away. Quote #3) "the New Testament began after the crucifixion of Jesus Christ and the shedding of His blood". While I agree with this statement I feel my opponent has again left out the second part of this truth. The new covenant/testament began with the death and resurrection, however the new covenant has not yet come to full fruition, it has not been completed. we still teach others to know Him, there is still a need to spread the Gospel, this fact directly contradicts theology stating that the new covenant as prophesied in (Jer. 31:31-34) has been completely fulfilled. This prophecy is only half fulfilled. consider this, the prophecy concerning the suffering servant AND the reigning King are both in the same prophetic passage. Do you disagree that it is only half fulfilled at this time? (1pet. 1:10) says even the prophets who wrote it, did not fully understand when or how these things would come to pass. This does NOT mean the spirit does not lead us to truth right now-(john 14:26, 16:12). This, also, was prophesied,--(Ezek. 36:26,27). and yes the law should be written on our hearts. The statement "law written on our heart" is said many more times in psalms(not prophetic) then the New testament, This is nothing new, it was ALWAYS supposed to be written on our hearts; (psalm 37:3, 40:8, 119:34), . further more. If the new covenant is complete, What is all the talk of Promises and Hope in Hebrews and else where?? The complete fruition of this covenant is in the millennium!!! This is what we are waiting for!!!! Quote #4) "The Gospel that is preached today is not the Gospel of the Kingdom which was given to Israel". This is COMPLETELY FALSE and my opponent has ZERO SCRIPTURE to aid his statement. I will, however, give scripture that proves this false. I will again give the scripture I presented once before proving Yeshua AND the Gospel were even during Moses.--(John 5:8, Heb. 4:2, Gal. 3:8). The Gospel of the death and resurrection was also promised by the Prophets(of Israel) as stated in (romans 1:1-4); Paul, a bondservant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated to the gospel of God 2 which He PROMISED before through HIS PROHETS in the Holy Scriptures, 3 concerning His Son Jesus Christ our Lord, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh, 4 and declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness, by the RESSURECTION from the DEAD. furthermore, Paul warns very seriously about "another Gospel" being preached.--(2cor.11:4, gal.1:6, 7). However your statement indicates there is more then one!? My opponents misunderstanding comes from believing the gospel of the kingdom is different from the gospel today. The only "difference" is they are different parts of the SAME gospel. Quote #5) "We have to be careful when applying scriptures from Matthew-Acts to ourselves as much of it concerns messages given to Jews under the Law." My opponent HAS ZERO SCRIPTURE to aid this statement. You, my friend, have excused yourself from certain portions of the Holy Scriptures to FIT YOUR DOCTRINE. I BACK ALL MY STATEMENTS WITH SCRIPTURE, YOU DO NOT. You do not believe all scripture is applicable to you, however I BELEIVE...ALL SCRIPTURE is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness--(2Tim.3:16). Quote #6) "Just as those of the dispensation of Promise knew nothing of the Law that was to be given to Moses" NO SCRIPTURE TO BACK THIS UP, I HAVE SCRIPTURE TO PROVE IT IS FALSE. (Gen. 26:5)-- because Abraham obeyed My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws." I ask my opponent how did Abraham keep the commandments, statutes, and laws if he did not know about them!? Quote #7) "So too those of the dispensation of the Law, including the 12 disciples, did not know of the grace that was to come by Jesus Christ". NO SCRIPTURE TO AID THIS STATEMENT, I WILL GIVE SCRIPTURE TO PROVE IT IS FALSE. (Luke 24:27)--And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in ALL the Scriptures the things concerning Himself. Read in context and you will see, Yeshua taught the disciples ALL things concerning Him. He also commanded them to teach ALL these things to others--(Math. 28:20). Quote #8) "This Gospel was given to the Apostle Paul after his conversion on the road to Damascus (Acts 9)" OPPONENT HAS NO SCRIPTURE TO BACKUP THIS CLAIM and even admits it in his next sentence. This is a clear example of mans opinion "filling in the gaps" to better suit there theology. I quote nothing but scripture while my opponent ADDS his pre-programmed opinions all over this thing!!. NOW THAT I HAVE PROVEN MY OPPONENTS FALSE DOCTRINE BASED ON HIS OPINION, I WILL NOW PRESENT A WRITTEN BIBLICAL TEACHING ON GALATIONS 3 AS MY OPPONENT SO GENEROUSLY ENDED WITH IN HIS OPENING ARGUMENT. IT WILL BE IN THE COMMENT SECTION.**PLEASE READ IT AND STUDY FOR YOURSELVES**