The Theory of Evolution Supports The Existence of a God

First of all, my apologies for missing the last round of debate. This website is relatively new to me and as such I haven't effectively been able to give it time amongst other things I have going on. Still, I should have know better, so again, my apologies. First of all, I feel I must address the ultimatum that was made to me by Con at the end of his argument. To be honest it has taken some thinking through, but I eventually came to the conclusion that it was rather inappropriate. To the topic for debate her is not whether or not God created this or that, and it certainly is not a debate about whether or not it is POSSIBLE for all these things to happen by themselves and I will concede that this is scientifically possible. HOWEVER, the topic at hand is whether or not these seemingly random changes in organisms that leads to them being more suited for an environment can provide support for the fact that a deity exists and has a hand in this and I can still say, with the utmost certainty, that it does. Cons insightful video told us simply that chemicals can bond together to form more complex chemical makeup's and eventually some are even able to replicate themselves. Does this in anyway subtract from proof that a God may have designed these chemicals to do exactly that? I think not. To continue on with my tower metaphor, once and architect has designed a building does he himself build it? The answer is no. So why must a God do the same? The architect may, from time to time, guide the builders and contractors to best fulfil his direction, but he (or she, I hate it when I'm accidentally sexist) does not actually take part in the construction. However I would like to move away from this now because as con did point out, I am bordering on abiogenesis, although it is in itself the foundation for evolution to take place and therefore should be considered a part of the process. To consider the diversity of life on this planet is absolutely mind boggling. Even more mind boggling is when you consider where it started, random chemicals grouping together. Now my opponent has used the words 'logically impossible' above and associated them with life coming into existence without a 'kick start' from above if you like. I like that idea so lets apply a bit of logic. Picture this, thousands of years ago a strand of DNA is a monkeys sperm cell was replicating itself and accidentally changed an adenine base to a guanine through innocent mutation. Now, this turns out to alter a gene in monkey to make it's pelvis suited for walking almost upright. This monkey finds it easier to reach food on the ground this way and becomes healthy, passing on this characteristic to the next generation. If that doesn't happen, we don't get humans today. The chances of that one base mutating in an advantageous way are so slim, its more likely to be a harmful mutation (99% are) and it was logically much more likely for it just to stay the same. Now I'm not using God merely as the go to for something extraordinary happening, I'm saying that when you think about it, this process of evolution through random mutations lends itself to our idea of a God that intelligently designed life on earth. I really hope Con does not try to tell us once again that it is scientifically for this to happen on it's own. That's not the point. Divine intervention does not subtract from this process, intact when you think about it, it actually allows it to make more sense rather than just a random series of mutations that never should have happened, it actually has a driving force behind it, something to give it meaning. Evolution and God do not contradict one another, the SUPPORT one another, lending to our understanding of each. Lastly consider this: At the start of this NBA season it was scientifically possible for the Bobcats to win the Playoffs. Common sense must always prevail and deep in everyones minds, this idea dictates everything we do in on way or another.