"Liberals thinks that everyone should have the same."

In your last rebuttal you are not happy with the number of examples I provided, who are you to decide how I will debate this subject. All you have done thus far is state your opinion on the subject. Your opinion just like mine is worthless. I have to provide evidence that what I say about liberals is true. The link I provided showed to the very last detail exactly what I said about liberals. The article provided was not submitted to debate school lunches, it was submitted to demonstrate how liberals want to make everybody the "same" in schools because they think it is unfair for other students to know that some of the other students are taking money from the govt' to pay for their lunch, they would further suggest making students who pay for their lunch to be forced to buy a Govt' lunch against their will in order to buy something else that they would prefer instead or even further completely remove the right period and force everyone to eat the "same" govt' subsidized lunches. My example is not invalid because you validate it by agreeing that the Govt' officials are "Liberals" and that you can "understand where they are coming from" Everything in this article is about making everyone the "same" regardless of their ability to pay . They are not the same but the liberal govt' officials want to pretend that they are by trying to eliminate the differences that would make them different I.E. take away the right to buy or provide your own lunch so everyone has to eat the "same" thing. And believe me if they could do it they would or they wouldn't even suggest it. The article also infers that having the Govt' pay for the lunches is virtuous and that people who pay for their lunches are somehow going to hurt the feelings of those who don't and thereby are insensitive towards the ones who get subsidized by the Govt'. You also stated that my example is invalid because it is a communist view and not a liberal one, Let me remind you that Liberal Govt' officials said this and you agree with where they are coming from but don't' like their solutions, maybe you should consider whether or not you are a liberal, because this is the solution according to the Liberal Govt' Officials in this article. I would ask you, what "Rights and Opportunities" do rich people exercise that poor people or even middle class people can't exercise? Homosexuals' rights are not being violated according to the law. You seem to think they are because they can't marry the same sex. Well you are wrong. I am a heterosexual male and I am not allowed to marry another heterosexual or homosexual man under the law. A homosexual man is not allowed to marry a heterosexual man or homosexual man. The same is true for women. But if a homosexual man wants' to marry either a heterosexual or homosexual women he has that right. The same goes for a woman marring a heterosexual or homosexual man. Liberals want to pretend that homosexual same sex marriages are the same as heterosexual opposite sex marriages. Same sex marriages will never have to contend with raising children because it is impossible for them to conceive children naturally. Liberals want to downgrade the meaning of marriage so they can make homosexual marriages the "same" as heterosexual marriages. They are not the same and to say they are defies nature and logic. Homosexuals have all the same rights as heterosexuals do when it comes to marriage. Marijuana vs. alcohol? I don't see any rights being violated here. No one is denied the right to drink alcohol when they reach the legal drinking age and marijuana is illegal to all. I find that most liberals are for abortion but against the death penalty. Let's see, kill the unborn innocent, save the convicted murder, absolutely defies logic in my mind.