Murder should be legalised

I will start by definition, rebuttals and then presentation of my argument. DEFINITIONS MURDER: mur""der - /"0"4m"0"5rd"0"5r/ noun 1. the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. Murderis the unlawful killing, with malice aforethought, of another human, and generally this premeditated state of mind distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful homicide(such as manslaughter.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder. the crime of deliberately killing a person. : something that is very difficult or unpleasant.www.merriam-webster.com/../murder. LEGALIZE: le""gal""ize - /"0"4l""g"0"5"0"5l""z/ verb 1. make (something that was previously illegal) permissible by law. Legalization is the process of removing a legal prohibition against something which is currently not legal.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalization. REBUTTALS My adversary said, 'Why is murder not legal? Our population reached a disastorous number long ago, and we need to keep it down. Lower it. Defeat the plague of evil and corruption that has swept over our world'. My adversary has just conceded in this debate by giving weak argument. Let me ask, will killing unlawfully solve evil and corruption in our society? In murder should be legalized, it then means we are inviting autocratic rule and also autocratic within ourselves(citizens). Imagine a situation where murder is legalized, I can kill anybody of my choice, provided the person goes on my shoe. It seems like my adversary do not know the meaning of murder. Now my opponent also pointed out, that the 'population is high, so we should reduce the population'and he said, it can be done by murder. Readers, please my adversary is ignorant of the fact, that he might be a victim to that if it should be legalized. Don't you think that the population is even moderate in case we have war against the outer world. Moreover, there are ways to reduce the population which murder is not there. The following ways includes 1.re-orientation of youths. 2.abstain from sex in youthful day in other to avoid unwanted pregnancy. 3.there should be family planning and the parents should decide how many children they want to give birth to. This can reduce the population of the world if need be and not by killing some one. Imagine how horrorful it will look when my adversary watches when they are stagging knife in her mum's stomach. Ladies and gentlemen, murder should not be legalized. My opponent said, murder is the solution. You can get rid of anybody standing on your way. This alone, has shown how the world will look like if everybody should get rid of another who is on his shoes. So disasterous. MY OPPONENT'S WEAKNESSES My opponent, gave no definition which means, he will argue with my own definition. My opponent made claims which he gave no source. My opponent said, there is corruption and evil so murder can reduce it, but he didn't explain how. My opponent has ironically conceded. ARGUMENT 1.IT WILL CAUSE HAVOCS AND DISTURB THE PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE BETWEEN CITIZENS, AND STATES. Now if murder should be legalized, it will bring problem in our society. Our society is already facing some socio, political and economic development and if we are to legalize murder, it means we are equally bringing in more problems. Let me ask, how will we know that the population of the world has even reduced? Don't you think that trade centres will be closed? Because they will be afraid of doing something that will warrant them been murdered? And imagine the hunger strike that citizens will go into. 2. IT WILL REDUCE DEVELOPMENT. Legalization of murder will retard the pace of our socio-economic development. Now contractors and people in the field of economic and social development will have to rest their nerves because no one wants to get caught by the horror of murder. 3.IT WILL ENCOURAGE WORLD WAS THREE (3). A situation where by one gets rid of anybody standing on his shoes, don't you think America can decide to get rid of germany? Or even france if possible? Because murder is legalized. This will even encourage war. And you don't tell me that if somebody should kill ur siblings, or your parents that you won't fight back. MY STAND IN THIS DEBATE IS THIS: SINCE THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO REDUCE POPULATION, WHICH I EARLIER EXPLAINED, THEN MURDER SHOULD NOT BE LEGALIZED. IN CONCLUSION, I defined the basic terms, rebutted my adversaries weak argument and then stated my argument. Which shows am ahead of this debate