I am richer than my opponent

I stand corrected on the 7 billion that your grandfather had. I misread your story, it is clear it said he had 700 million.I'm glad my opponent forfeited the idea of arguing the definiton of rich when earlier he stated he would fight it until the end. This may be because his honesty is in great question. Working off of that, I am entitled to point out information that is already available to us through our Profiles. Let’s start with mine. I have a picture of myself in a business suit with a white background. My profile states I make $150,000+ a year. I am also Jewish and Republican. Republicans are more likely to be rich demographically.My opponent, on the other hand… well take a look. He has a picture of a native wearing some animal bone mask. It looks like a rendition of that demon thing from the movie Pan’s Labyrinth. Probably a picture you drew in art class. It is really good by the way. I respect that art work. You did a great job at that painting/drawing/possibly-other-medium-you-used. Notice his education says “high school”. I don’t see “some college” like mine says. It should say “some college” if it were to match his story, but it doesn’t. He isn’t stating his income probably because he doesn’t have income. He probably is living with his mom and dad who supply him. This is reasonable since he is likely an average senior in high school. He is also a democrat which is a very popular party for poor people. Not saying my opponent is poor, but it is less likely for him to be super rich like me. My occupation is “self-employed” his occupation is “student”. On top of all that his username is Witch_doctor. Sounds kind of superstitious. Tell me, which do you feel more comfortable trusting. Someone with the username Witch_doctor or TheGodson.Check out the link concerning political stance among the wealthy, my opponent trails in the14%, while I’m in the 56%:http://www.forbes.com...I bet my opponent wishes he could change his profile, but I hope posting this will prevent him:https://web.archive.org... What you see above is his profile page where his information is archived early in the morning of February 17, 2016. It is on the Wayback Machine; a website that records previous webpages on particular days.One last thing I’d like to ask about for clarity. Your security system that you say you sold for 2.3 billion dollars is not on the list for the-10-most-expensive-acquisitions-Google-has-ever-made in the link below. It should be number 4 on the blog below, but it is not. How is it that the main source of most of your income that made you so rich is not on the list?http://bgr.com...It would not surprise me if the voters have doubts about the validity of these stories presented by both of us since they are pretty unusual. I will ask the voters to please use logic over emotional irrationality. Please make a logical vote based on possible outcomes:1) I’m truthful and my opponent is truthful: Vote me (since my opponent admits I am richer in his story)2) I’m lying and my opponent is truthful: Vote my opponent (note: this is the most unlikely outcome and the only good one for my opponent.)3) I’m lying and my opponent is lying: Vote me (since I’m older and he’s an 18 year old... granted, your balls have dropped, but come on you’re probably still in high school and you know it.)4) I’m truthful and my opponent is a liar: Vote me for obvious reasons.Assign the above choices with a percent chance of each possible outcome. Now add the percentages for #s 1, 3, and 4 for my total percentage. My opponent’s percentage is #2. Whoever has the greater percentage should win the debate. I feel this is a fair determination of the winner.I really enjoyed this debate sharing my life story and challenging my opponent.-Lawrence Fischer