RESOLUTION: "Atheists do not have a basis for their logic and reasoning"

"The fact that objective truth exists is based upon the assumption that reality has inherent properties , an assumption made by atheist and theist alike."If Theists and atheists both are making an incorrect and useless assumption then both render futile. You must prove that reality has inherent properties beyond the subjective interpretation of it. Just as two wrongs don't make a right, neither do two fallacies make a truth."If truth ("that which reflects reality") is axiomatic ("self evidently true") then I don't understand your objection here. Words are symbols which indicate particular concepts, sometimes these concepts are tied down to orientations of matter found in reality."The system of language is most likely imperfect and flawed due to the fact that it was constructed by fallible creatures. thus, using it to understand and reason about a perfect entity, such as god, is not realising the limitations which language places upon us."It is irrelevant whether or not the fundamental nature of reality (as described by the laws of logic) was authored by a god. An ultimate authority, by definition, does not appeal to anything else. If even the god who you believe created the universe would have to appeal to the laws of logic in order to create something real, then the laws of logic are the ultimate authority, not the creator, and somebody who does not believe in that creator would still have that ultimate authority available to them."That is assuming that there is not a place for something to exist that surpasses reality altogether. An abyss where no logic applies, no 'laws' apply and simply raw power is emitted form nothingness by a manner that defies to laws of physics within the constraints of this perceived reality. This is the abyss in which God resides. This is the abyss that reason cannot disprove. This is the abyss that explains what created the matter and energy required for the big bang that no atheist will ever be able to explain the true origin of other than 'it always existed', which is exactly what they attack theists for saying about god. At least Theists admit that the god is not in this reality and thus the logic and laws of this reality do not apply to he/she/it whereas atheists are saying that in a reality where things get created and destroyed, matter and energy are eternal, just like god. If anything, the atheist's logic is the more fallacious one."The fact that, in order to get around the laws of logic, you believe your god would have to either: A) unravel the fabric of reality; or B) retreat to an alternate reality, proves the sub-point I made above -- that you actually agree with my characterization of THIS reality."No, it does not. This is a complete lie. The god is not retreating to an alternate reality, God is in an abyss that is neither real nor unreal. There is no evidence to prove that to be 'real' is digital in an 'on/off' manner. God is real but not physically real. There is, in other words, a degree of realness that an entity can have but in this reality there is only 'real' or 'nonexistent' as a setting. That does not mean that unicorns and ghosts are not real in a nature that this reality cannot comprehend. in fact, there are probably tooth fairies and pixies blessing and cursing this debate as we speak, rigging it for one side to win. I just hope the pixies aren't cursing me, I hear that they are very mean.In conclusion, there is no basis for the logic and reasoning that atheists use.