Developed Nations have a Moral Obligation to accept Refugees

Hello ladies, gentlemen. This is Forever23 and I am here to bring forth the premise which is that developed nations do not have a moral obligation to accept refugees. My ensuing roadmap will include first, abrogating my opponents point, then restating my own points and finally, divulging a new assertion into the debate. The props first assertion was that it is a small scale moral obligation. He stated that it is best to use up some of our own resources to help others. He gave a great analogy about how you own an island and a ship sinks and there is one survivo rand then how the owner of an island needs to save that one survivor. However, Im sure that Lupricona failed to see that if we share our resources with the refugees, we will bring doom upon ourselves. That would be because many countries are not able to support the burden of refugees. Now, not only the refugees are in trouble, but so are the people in these nations. So as to say, not only will the survivor of the ship accident die, but so will the island owner due to lack of materials needed to survive. Their second point was that people should share their land with others because we are all people and need to aid each other. That is true, but only if the aiding does not harm us. In fact, according to CNN, ISIS and other terrorist groups hid 10000 of their men among refugees. These people could then hurt the citizens of a country and the nation itself. Therefore, the country should help other but only when it knows that this will not end up in potential harm. Now to summarize our points: 1. Morally good not moral must 2. Has a high potential end up in causing harm to nation citizens. 3. Is that it takes away from available resources from poor and disadvantaged families My fourth assertion is that it many refugees can be terrorists. Many of these people have come from a war zone. They have probably been very stressed. Since they can possibly be very depressed, they many hurt the developed nations that have offered them asylum. Other than that, many terrorists can hide their people among refugees. According to CNN, 10000 ISIS men were hidden among the refugees. According to dailymail.co.uk, Violent video games can alter the brain in just one week and make players more aggressive, according to researchers. Scientists at the Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis took a group of 22 men aged 18-29 and performed MRI scans on them.They then divided the group in half, and while one group was asked to play violent video games for at least 10 hours a week while the second group played none. According to the Sunday Times, the researchers found that the effects on the brain were discovered in the left inferior frontal lobe and the anterior cingulate cortex.An abstract of the report which will be published at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America later this week said subjects experienced alterations to their brain. This may seem irrelevant, however it is relevant. This is what happens to the brain when people play war games. Imagine what happens to the brain when a man or woman experiences actual war. This is very significant because with this damage, refugees can cause a potential harm to the people of a nation. I'm sure that we don't want to do a philanthropic act if the end scenario will be- disaster. Thank you, please vote for the opposition side.