Schools should have the power to pat, search, or drug test any student at any random time.

Sorry mine took so long. ==REBUTTALS==Pro said "When discussing why or why not something should happen in a school environment you have to bring into consideration what would happen if you got in that same situation as an adult. " 1) How is this even relevant to this topic? WE are talking about students and school environments. Students and adults live in completely different worlds. For example, it is perfectly reasonable a student would get in trouble with a teacher. Do adults have problems with teachers? Students learn everything from teachers. Do adults learn from teachers? Teachers have almost complete control over students. Do teachers have control over other adults? No. Pro also said that "All the things you pointed out can/have/and will happen in situations other than with students. Meaning that you are just pointing out things wrong with privacy in general rather than privacy in school. "1). .. This shows that Pro agrees with me that the thing that i pointed do happen. Even if, this can happen with other people, that does not justify allowing searches. School environments should be a safe zone for children. Developing children who are not well acquainted to the world shouldn't be subjected to the same dangers as adults. Some children simply aren't mature or have the power to stand for themselves.2) Abuse by teachers. These teachers do not have the same control over adults/other people. These situations only happen with teachers and students.3) Name other searches in which this happens. In my main arguments about embarrassment, bullying, and similar negative things, all of these have teachers abusing this as the basis and cause. Now why is this only specific to school environments? Teachers spend alt of time with students, and this time can culminate in dislike. Say you visit an airport. Their are security checks you go through. Now those guards, the chances of you actually knowing one is extremely small. And even if they know and dislike you, you easily have the option of going to different guards to get checked. In other situtuations, the people who are doing the searches simply do not have the time to create any negative opinion about you. Pro also said. .. "Your rebuttals also had nothing to do with my statements. You breifly touched my statements and failed to give any significance why your statement is more reliable or true than yours. "Well. .. This is going to take a very long time.1a. You talked about how people only have bodily and mental/emotional privacy.1b. I countered this by saying that. .. If you give someone bodily privacy, searches and pats are useless. I also said that if you give them the right to not answer any questions. .. It wouldn't make any logical sense. You can't question suspicious people but you can search them?1c. I clearly broke your argument down and argued against everything. 2a. You said that embarrassment and singling out people also happens when adults get searched. .. And you also talked about how race isn't applicable to searches. And finally you said that because of those reasons, a teacher should have the right to say who gets searched. 2b. I said that. .. even if other people also get embarrassed, we still have to consider and listen to students. Adults and students are different. I also mentioned that my arguments were based around the fact that teachers can abuse this ability and destroy school environments. Finally, I talked about how you confused my racism argument. I stated that racism will increase do to searches. You were talking about that racism doesn't matter in searches. And finally, as a response to how teachers should have this right, I said that we can't give this right and trust the teachers.2c. I don't see how I didn't respond to everything. Once again, I broke down your argument and made a solid case against it. In conclusion, I did touch your statements and I showed how they were all invalid. ==DROPPED ARGUMENTS==The following arguments PRO never directly responded to, which means they concede to them.1) Unpopularity - They said nothing about my argument about how people will challenge this right, which means the concede and admit to this.2) Isolation - Once again, even though I pointed this out, PRO did not try to respond to this. They admit that if we put pressure and take away privacy from students, we subject them to isolation and psychological problems. This leads to criminals and school shootings.3)Embarrasment, Bullying, etc. - PRO does not even try to disprove that this will happen. They only try to say that "this happens in all searches" but I have stated that these situations will only happen in school environments, as teachers are the only people who will have any motivation to abuse their powers against students they dislike. ==COMPARISONS== In conclusion. .. My opponent has talked about:1) Students should only have bodily and mental/emotional privacy. (I have stated why this does not make logical sense. )2) How embarrassment, singling out, and etc will happen in outside situations. (I have stated why they are only specific to school environments)3) How race shouldn't be a factor in searches. (I've talked about racist teachers, and sexism, and classism)I've talked about:1) The 4th Amendment: All people hBave rights. This amendment speaks for itself.2) Teachers Abusing This: Biased teachers exist, along with racism, sexism, and classism. Furthermore, teachers often have students that they dislike. All of these factors can culminate in teachers abusing these powers to make students feel embarrassment, bullying, and other negative experiances. 3) Isolation: Students need a sense of security and privacy. This simply will put more mental strain and pressure on students, along with possible increases in bullying. More and more psychological problems will occur, and school shootings will also increase. Needless to say, this can also result in long-term trauma and turn people into violent criminals.4)Unpopularity: I've stated that this new right to teachers will be met be unpopularity among students and parents. In a democratic government as ours, shouldn't we listen to the public?