Poor schoolchildren should clean up after rich schoolchildren or go hungry

Preface;Ha, thanks I'll take that into account next time.Rebuttals: "Defending these remarks, the Prince said: "In my view it is just as great an achievement to be a plumber or a bricklayer as it is to be a lawyer or a doctor. Not everyone has the same talents or abilities." On this point I agree with His Royal Highness, although it should be noted that their achievements, at least in capitalist societies, are not equally respected or financially-rewarded" To this point I agree, not everyone is capable of being a nuclear physicist and it would be foolish to suggest that they were. Neither should a bricklayer be given the same wage as a nuclear physicist despite deserving respect for the job he does. "The extreme right-wing former British dictator, Margaret "the milk-snatcher" Thatcher, wouldn't have agreed with the Prince though. This is the Tory tyrant who famously said "A man who, beyond the age of 26, finds himself on a bus can count himself as a failure." If you are wondering, by the way, how this deceased despot acquired her "milk-snatcher" moniker, the answer is that before she was installed as Britain's most despised leader, she was put in charge of education and one of the first things she did was take the kids' free school milk off them.If she were a Republican politician in America, she wouldn't have stolen their milk, though, she would have made them either pay for it or work for it instead, just as my opponent suggests would be a reasonable demand, even though this would separate the kids into two groups: "the haves" able to afford school refreshments; and "the have-nots" who would have to perform humiliating chores for them." Actually we do have to pay for our milk here in the U.S. but those who can't afford are eligible for financial assistance. I find it beneficial for children to learn that they won't have things handed to them, there is no free lunch in college, no free lunch in life unless you plan on being homeless or on welfare which might very well happen if children are not exposed to having to work for what they have."Surely we should be striving to provide children with the equality of opportunity to reach their full potential, regardless of the family backgrounds? That way, children will grow up and prosper in life according to their merit rather than their parents' bank balance." Of course, some of the world's greatest leaders have come from less than Rockefeller families. However introducing children to work does not take away any of their opportunities, in fact the work experience might help them score entry level jobs that would be difficult to obtain without anything to put on a resume. Not only would the experience help build up their credentials but it would also build up their character and work ethic, tools that the gifted can use to propel themselves to the top.Conclusion: Making poor children clean up after the rich will give them advantages in work ethics, credentials, and character building while alleviating financial stress on the system which will allow more funds to go to public services. At the same time there are little to no drawbacks.