Everything is Interconnected

I have less than 30 minutes to think up a refutation and type this. I honestly regret having made such a lofty debate at this time. Anyway, I'm glad that my opponent pointed out that even a subjective reality is a reality, and reality need not be absolute to be called reality. My opponent is saying that there are conventional "realities" that we operate by, but unfortunately, his point is not very meaningful, because everything is interconnected if and only if nothing is real in the absolute sense, so conventional realities are irrelevant to this debate. I was just pointing out in my tautology that the way the universe plays out or develops is through many individual parts doing what they do at the same time. There is an eternal NOW in which the entire universal process happens. I'm not saying that I play a big part in the state of the universe, but the universe is indeed in ONE state. "99% of species that have ever existed are now extinct and still life exists" This quote shows the depth of my opponents misinterpretations of interconnectedness. He starts talking about things being destroyed and the rest continuing on. I'm not saying that everything is essential for the continuation of anything, I'm saying that it was the same process that created all things. The Earth never could have come into being without there being a Universe (which, being a Universe, contains all accessible 3 dimensional space) for it to come into. A human never could have come into being without apes evolving in a competitive environment requiring the prefrontal cortex. Interconnectedness means that everything is dependently arisen relative to everything else. We can see this from the moment of the Big Bang, in which all mass-energy exploded outwards from a single point. Interconnectedness means that things happen or come into being spontaneously when conditions are ripe for it, and that when conditions are hostile for it, it changes into something else. The point is that there are no specific forms, there is one ever changing form. This is always true, though at extremely large scales it is harder and harder to see. Because the universe is in a transitional phase from a point of infinite density to a completely flat, infinite space, it is interconnected, because every event in this universe contributes to the same goal of infinite space by increasing entropy. I wrote that matter is made of hadrons, which are configurations of possibility. Quarks and leptons configure themselves in such a way that the whole hadron can interact with other nucleons, making an atom. This shows that matter is conventional, and it arises out of a configuration of possibility. This simply means that they are interactions with no substance. My opponent has not addressed this point. I have such little time, so I am not going to submit any more arguments, but I recommend that the reader of this debate examine Quantum Entanglement, a quantum phenomenon in which a particle splits off into two sub particles with opposite spin. When the spin of one particle is changed, the spin of the other one "knows" that the spin of its counterpart has changed, and therefore changes its spin. This phenomenon would occur instantaneously even if the sub particles were across the universe from each other. We don't know why this happens, but if it does, it means that particles have a means of nonlocal communication. The point is that it is not the object that exists, it is the environment that exists. The object is merely a seamless part of the environment; that it is recognized as an object is a human mistake. Everything is interconnected, and it's not "woo woo" to think so. No magic involved. Thanks to my opponent for taking this debate.