Charlie Sheen is more socially undesirable than Lindsey Lohan.

Pro has not refuted any of the objective behavior of Lindsay Lohan, however I will go over them: -Stealing a necklace, and pleading not guilty -Doing Cocaine -Drinking while driving -Slandering Sarah Palin -Endorsing Barack Obama, whose presidency has caused this nation to suffer -Feeding us full stupidity According to Pro, Charlie Sheen only "crime" is cocaine use. I should remind the audience that since Pro is entering his final line, he cannot indict new arguments or evidence proving that Charlie Sheen has antisocial behavior. It should be noted that Pros reasoning for why people are required to register for Charlie Sheen's site is speculative and unsubstantial, and should be disregarded. Even without a source to back up Pros claim, I have demonstrated in the previous round why using Justin Bieber as a source is fallacious reasoning. CON states that kids will be affected by Charlie Sheen's actions. Again, the demographics for Two and a Half men are adults[1]. Charlie Sheen does not even play a character who is meant to be a role model. He plays a character who is selfish, hedonistic, and a drug user. Lindsay Lohan is a Walt Disney movie star. Disney is obviously designed to appeal to children. It's the difference between Mr. Rogers and Howard Stern being caught snorting cocaine and sleeping with prostitutes. Howard Stern was never meant to be a role model and his show is designed for an older audience. It's different with Mr. Rogers who should have higher expectations. Therefore, from both magnitude of harm AND who should have higher expectations, Lindsay Lohan wins both contests. So what is Pro's main contention. Charlie Sheen supposedly does not face the consequences of his actions. I will demonstrate why this is false. Pro states that Lohan got arrested and went to rehab, while Charlie Sheen did not. This is false! My opponent makes an incorrect claim. Charlie Sheen was sentenced to 30 days of rehab [2] My opponent has not shown a single example of Lindsay Lohan apologizing for her actions. I checked my opponents sources and not once does it state that Lindsay Lohan apologized or said she was sorry for her actions. My opponent is simply lying about this. Pleading guilty =/= apologizing. And again, Charlie Sheen ALSO pleaded guilty. Charlie Sheen actually DID apologize for his actions[4]. Basically, all the information that PRO has stated is patently false. Lindsay Lohan has said some outrageous material that endorses her behavior and is straight up lies: "How can you not like Britney Spears? " "Going clubbing is my way of relaxing or releasing a lot of stress. I don't feel that I should have to justify that part of my life. I don't know that I'm necessarily an addict. " "I'm not skinny for the wrong reasons. It's not because I'm bulimic or anorexic or doing drugs. " "When someone tells me not to do something, I'll do it more. " As I stated in the previous round, Charlie Sheen is proven to be clean. [5] That's more than can be stated with Lindsay Lohan. So why shouldn't Charlie Sheen feel good about ‘winning'? Remember he made the claim that he was winning AFTER he quit doing drugs, not before. Charlie Sheen did not lie when he stated that he was able to cure himself. People can stop doing actions through sheer force of will power. In Charlie Sheen's interview with Katie Couric, Charlie Sheen just answered the questions honestly. She asked him how much cocaine he has done in a sitting. Charlie replied "I was banging 7 gram rocks. That's how I roll". He was not endorsing his behavior. He was just answering the question truthfully. He even states that for most people, the quantity WOULD kill others. "I'm different. I have a different constitution, I have a different brain, I have a different heart. I got tiger blood, man. " Since most people do NOT have tigers blood, it's logical to conclude that this would not be an endorsement of drug use. Charlie Sheen is actually the more noble person out there who does drugs. He does not feel the need to blame others for his actions. He takes full responsibility. In the interview Katie Couric states "He makes no excuses for it" Next Pro complains that Charlie Sheen is doing a ‘comedy tour' and is ‘suing his boss'. First off, there is nothing wrong with Charlie Sheen doing a comedy tour. He will be providing entertainment for thousands perhaps millions from the tour. He is acting productively. Next, Pro attacks Charlie Sheen for ‘suing his boss'. As far as I'm concerned, Charlie Sheen is an American like any other person. He has the right to sue others for wrongful actions. Charlie Sheen lost his job and did not receive it back even after coming clean from drug use. Charlie Sheen has the right to job security, and his boss should follow the rules and condition of the contract. If Charlie Sheen feels his boss did not uphold his end of the contract, Charlie Sheen has the right to sue, end of story. It's not even certain if Charlie Sheen will even win the lawsuit, but he has the right like any other American to file one. Conclusion: Pro has made claims about Charlie Sheen that are false without any sources or proof. Lindsay Lohan is worse than Charlie Sheen for a multitude of reasons as explained earlier. Charlie Sheen has been more apologetic and has actually had to face his actions more than Linday Lohan. If anything, Charlie Sheen has been punished MORE for his actions, through losing his job in Two and Half Men, even though there is proof he is clean. Charlie Sheen has been more truthful and responsible about his problems then Lindsay Lohan, and has done a better job of cleaning up his act. [1]. http://tinyurl.com... [2]. http://tinyurl.com... [3]. http://tinyurl.com... [4]. http://tinyurl.com... [5]. http://tinyurl.com...