Resolved: The average intelligence of a Fox News Anchor is = or < the average intelligence of a rock

"I look forward to a great, non-semantic debate"LOL!!! Have you ever seen any of my debates???As for the definition of "Average Fox Anchorman", it would appear that the Con went to a fox news site to get a list of anchormen. However we all know that any site by fox news is horrendously biased and misleading, so instead I will quote a more factual internet site to get a list of fox news anchors....................... Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org...According to Wikipedia, the lineup of Fox News Anchors include: - Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson and Brian Kilmeade for "Fox and Friends" - Bill Hemmer and Martha MacCalium for "America's Newsroom" - Jon Scott and Jenna Lee for "Happening Now" - Megyn Kelly for "America Live" - Shepard Smith with "Studio B" and later again on "Fox Report" - Neil Cavuto on "Your World" - Greg Gutfeld, Bob Beckel, Eric Bolling, Andrea Tantaros, Dana Perino, Kimberly Guilfoyle and Juan Williams host "The Five" - Bret Baier on "Special Report with Bret Baier - Bill O'Reilly on "The O'Reilly factor" - Sean Hannity on "Hannity"and lastly, - Greta Van Susteren on "On the record"So of the 9 people the con named as fox news anchors according to fox news, only 4 of them actually have their own segments on fox news. Therefore I would like to admit this claim into evidence against Fox News in the argument that half the stuff they claim is pure bullsh*t.Moving on then, there are 11 regular segments on Fox News that shall be analyzed to see if the anchormen on those shows are dumb/dumber then rocks, or not. A video will be provided of each show (shown to the right in order of time slot) and the quality of information will determine if the pundits on those shows are as dumb as rocks, ON AVERAGE.Videos will receive one of two grades, "Dumb as rocks" if information given is beyond stupid, and "Factual and informative" if the information is actually correctLets begin:First video = Fox and friends http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Dumb as rocks......Second Video = America's Newsroom http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Factual and InformativeThird Video = Happening Now http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Dumb as rocks.....Fourth Video = America Live http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Dumb as rocks.....Fifth Video = Shepard Smith on Fox Report http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Dumb as rocks.....Sixth Video = Your World http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Factual and InformativeSeventh Video = The Five http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Dumb as rocks.....Eighth Video = Special Report with Bret Baier http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Factual and InformativeNinth Video = The O'Reilly Factor http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Dumb as Rocks....Tenth Video = Hannity http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Dumb as Rocks....Eleventh Video = On the record http://www.youtube.com...Grade = Factual and InformativeSo the final score by TV segments is Dumb as rocks = 7Factual and informative = 4But if you factor in how many hosts there are per show, then the score gets a little more lopsided since "The Five" has five anchors and "Fox and Freinds" has three, adding those extra anchormen into the score and the new tally isDumb as Rocks = 13Factual and Informative = 4This basically states that since 13 of 17 anchormen on fox news are dumb as rocks, the percentage of anchormen on Fox news that are dumb as rocks is 13 / 17 = 76.5%76.5% of all fox news anchors are dumb as rocks, and since average in the debate resolution refers to 50% (Sorry if I didnt make that clear before) then I have met my bop showing that the average (>50%) of fox news anchors are indeed dumb as rocks.Back to you Con :D