Evolution and science is an oxymoron

Thanks Pro for your...case.I'm glad that Pro has no issues with the definitions of "oxymoron," from round 1.This means that Pro accepts the burden as described in my round 1.Pro accepts the burden to show that the phrase "evolution and science" is a rhetorical, contradictory, non-literal phrase.*Pro's Case*Unfortunately, Pro didn't make a case for a non-literal, contradictory, rhetorical phraseology, rather Pro used their round 2 to remind us of the definition of the term "science" that Pro had already provided in round 1.Pro claims:"since evolution...has never been observed or experimented the fact that it is considered a form of science makes evolution and science an oxymoron."My response:What does this have to do with being non-literal?How does this indicate that "evolution and science" is a figure of speech?What rhetorical device is being employed when one utters "evolution and science?"This is where Pro should actually focus their case...But you all know what's about to happen, right?Check the avatar...CUZ WE'RE ABOUT TO DROP A SCIENCE BOMB!*Observation and Experimentation*Pro has claimed that five arbitrarily chosen forms of evolution do not observe or experiment, so I'll defend each one.Oh, and I hope it's obvious that IRL, the term evolution almost exclusively refers to the mechanism behind the biodiversity of life on earth, not cosmology, chemistry, or biochemistry; I did however, agree to those terms, so...1. Cosmic Evolution - the origin of spacetime and matter.The space of our universe is expanding at a constant rate, called the Hubble Constant.http://www.pnas.org...As time passes, the universe's space expands at this constant rate, relative to the proportional distances between galaxies.This means that if you were to go back in time, space would contract at that constant rate, the inverse of the Hubble constant.So when we trace space back to its smallest point, using this constant, we reach the origin of spacetime itself, the Big Bang.What's great is, one can OBSERVE the galaxies moving away from each other at this constant and, using a radio telescope, one can see the remnants of the big bang.https://science.nasa.gov...The origins of space and matter, though, have more to do with quantum mechanics, because if space gets smaller and smaller as we trace the constant back in time, space must have been the size of a subnuclear particle at one point.Given that empty space, as EXPERIMENTED here on earth, is shown to have incomplete sub nuclear particles existing and being annihilated, we know that these quantum fluctuations are a fact and make up the nothing of empty space.http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com...I have to make this point perfectly clear.These sub nuclear particles fluctuating in and out of existence, quantum fluctuations, are what nothing is, and this is always the case.There is no "nothing" without these fluctuations, period.However, when there was no universe, there was no space, and instead, space and time fluctuated along with the existence and annihilation of the incomplete particles; nothing remained...no matter/energy/space/time/gravity...nothing.This nothing is inherently unstable, with all of that fluctuation going on, so something is inevitably expressed from this nothing state...that something was the big bang. http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov...2. Chemical Evolution - all elements evolved from hydrogen."The early universe was a very hot place...[which allowed for] the formation of heavier elements, atomic nuclei with many protons and neutrons, from the fusion of lighter elements...""...one second after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe was roughly 10 billion degrees and was filled with a sea of neutrons, protons, electrons, anti-electrons (positrons), photons and neutrinos. As the universe cooled, the neutrons either decayed into protons and electrons or combined with protons to make deuterium (an isotope of hydrogen)."http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov...Nucleosynthesis, the formation of heavier elements from hydrogen, is an observable and testable scientific fact that explains the cosmic formation of elements from hydrogen...thanks NASA. http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov...3. Stellar Evolution - stars and planets formed from gas-rich nebulae.Once you have a bunch of heavier elements being formed from lighter elements, the gaseous, dusty network coalesces thanks to gravity and creates massive clouds rich with gaseous elements and compounds."Turbulence deep within these clouds gives rise to knots with sufficient mass that the gas and dust can begin to collapse under its own gravitational attraction."https://science.nasa.gov..."Stars form inside relatively dense concentrations of interstellar gas."http://abyss.uoregon.edu... http://abyss.uoregon.edu...4. Organic Evolution - life begins from inanimate matter, abiogenesis.A. With an atmosphere, water salinity, inorganic compounds, electricity, and UV rays likely of a prebiotic earth, inorganic compounds can naturally become organic compounds in the form of amino acids.http://www.pnas.org...B. Amino acids make up proteins, in chains called polypeptides, and the sequence of the amino acid chain causes the polypeptide to fold into a shape that is biologically active.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...C. Biologically active amino acid sequences can in fact metabolize compounds.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...D. Amino acids are catalysts, because they tend to increase the rate of chemical reactions, and in a prebotic network full of amino acids, RNA can emerge due to its auto-catalytic property.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...E. RNA is also self-replicating, and because of this, was able to thrive in a prebiotic amino acid network.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...F. With biologically active amino acid chains and self-replicating RNA, membranes can form, which all combined forms a protocell.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...G. Protocells can metabolize with amino acids and replicate with RNA, and this is the origin of genetic polymers.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...H. A protocell with a membrane and genetic polymers that can metabolize and self replicate is a full blown living cell, and these single cells are life; they're simple life, but they're life.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...I. These simple life forms would need to eventually consume more, and the network of amino acids and other compounds in the region were in fact edible.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...5. Macro-Evolution - animals and plants change from one type into another.The apple maggot fly has been observed speciating and has an awesome explanation to it.The original species, the Hawthorne Fly, used to feed on the fruit of hawthorns using that fruit for its maggots.Once apples were introduced into their environment, some of the hawthorn flies fed only on the apples, while the typical hawthorn fly remained eating the fruits of hawthorns.Now, since so much time has passed, currently, apple eating hawthorns (apple maggot flies) mature later in the season, and require chemicals from apples that help with fertilization/reproduction.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...The original hawthorn fruit eaters simply cannot interbreed with the apple eaters,and remember the apple eaters were once hawthorn flies.They are now two different species, and the parasites that inhabit them have also evolved along with the diet change.Oh, of course, humans' 2nd chromosome is a fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes proving our descent from apes.http://genome.cshlp.org... Pro?