This Church would Proclaim: Jesus and Hitler: a romance is divinely inspired

Rebuttals: My news sources are from esteemed newspapers and biographies - you have one article from a random site claiming Hitler is alive. Hitler is dead, the world acknowledges it. 1. It is not a theory that Hitler is dead. If you read the article I posted closely, you will find there were several DIRECT eyewitnesses to his burning corpse. He is dead. 2. How do you get the date accounting for leap year and solar winds? You would have to know how old (exactly) the world is to calculate that, which is impossible. Its easier to accept the date 2025 AD, because again, as I said, "Neo-Nazi" Empire suggests a later date. 3. Jesus was sinless. Homosexuality is a sin. You are right, sins are directed by God. God never changes. Numbers 23:19 says: 19 God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill? Since God declared homosexuality as a sin, he would never change from that standard. Since Jesus was sinless it follows that he never could have engaged in homosexuality. Therefore, your "prophecy" is false, which means it is not divinely inspired. You still have not provided a definition for FTL travel, or if its even possible. You have one source written by an unknown guy on the internet with no evidence claiming that not only is it possible, but it was achieved in 1940s as you claim? This may be POSSIBLE to believe if you accepted the date as 2025 AD, as anything could be developed in the next few years. But, then you would face the problem of Hitler dying long ago before the prophecy. Either way, its false. Time travel is impossible, according to the most esteemed scientists in the world including the Hong Kong physicists. Your "prophecy" is false and therefore not divinely inspired. ""What is the gospel of Phallus " read round one bruh. "why is it credible?" Uhhh, same reason the bible is crediable." So, the gospel of Phallus is written by some random guy on an internet blog? Ok. And why is it credible? You claimed because the Bible is credible. This is circular reasoning. The Bible is credible because it was divinely inspired AND because there is much archaeological and historical writings that match the Bible. In assuming that your document is credible because the Bible is credible, you assume that your document is divinely inspired (circular reasoning, we are in the process of arguing that) and backed up by archaeological and historical evidence (which you have not shown). So, NO. I ask you again, why is the "Gospel of Phallus", which was typed into some internet blog, credible in the least? Can you show us some archaeological evidence? Perhaps historians collaborating its accounts? No and No. Now let me discuss Hitler's "Christianity". Hitler was not a Christian. He may have claimed he was, but that means nothing. I can claim I am a basketball. Does that mean I am a basketball? No. Just because someone claims something does not mean it is true. According to Alan Bullock, Hitler was a rationalist and materialist "who believed neither in God nor in conscience".[1] Alan Bullock; Hitler: a Study in Tyranny, Harper Perennial Edition 1991, p. 216. "Nonetheless, Hitler opportunistically employed the language of "divine providence" in defence of his own myth.[2] When young, Hitler was baptised and confirmed in the Roman Catholic Church and raised by an anti-clerical father and practising Catholic mother. In adulthood, he became disdainful of Christianity, but retained some respect for the organisational power of the Church. Although he was prepared to allay conflicts for political reasons, according to Kershaw, Bullock, Evans, Fest, Phayer, Shirer and others, he eventually hoped to eradicate Christianity in Germany.[3]" Alan Bullock, Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives, Fontana Press 1993, p. 412. Richard J. Evans; The Third Reich at War; Penguin Press; New York 2009, p. 547: According to Kershaw, Hitler was "a very private, even secretive individual", able to deceive "even hardened critics" as to his true beliefs. His anti-Christian world view is evidenced in sources such as the Goebbels Diaries, the memoirs of Albert Speer, and the transcripts edited by Martin Bormann in Hitler's Table Talk. The historian Evans wrote that Hitler repeatedly called Nazism a secular ideology founded on science, which in the long run could not co-exist with religion. Goebbels wrote in 1941 that Hitler "hates Christianity".[6] Speer wrote after the war that Hitler had "no real attachment" to Catholicism, but that he never formally left the Church. Rees concludes that "Hitler's relationship in public to Christianity"indeed his relationship to religion in general"was opportunistic. There is no evidence that Hitler himself, in his personal life, ever expressed any individual belief in the basic tenets of the Christian church".[7] Laurence Rees; The Dark Charisma of Adolf Hitler; Ebury Press; 2012; p135. Julian Baggini; Atheism a Very Short Introduction; Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 85-87 Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs of Albert Speer; New York: Simon and Schuster, p. 94 Jump up to: a b Albert Speer; Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs; Translation by Richard & Clara Winston; McMillan Publishing Company; New York; 1970; p.49 Hitler was not a Christian, and would have hated Jesus because Jesus was Jewish... "when I read the gospel of phallus, I get good feelings. Niiiice feelings. Hot feelings. I have never felt this divine reading anything else other than the bible. The gospel of phallus has touched me in many ways. How can it not be divine when it gives this clear revelations?" - Pro Pornography may also give you that feeling. Does this mean porn is divinely inspired? No. Just because something gives you a good feeling does not mean it is from God. Before ending by refutations, I would like to point out that the basic elements of this prophecy is flawed, as I have shown. It is false, and therefore cannot be divinely inspired. Pro has attempted to show that this a historical work, but I would like to note that he has not shown its connection with God and failed to uphold his BOP thus far. Even if its true (which is contrary to the evidence), in order for it to be divinely inspired it must also be FROM GOD. Pro has failed to show its connection thus far. My final question to you Pro is, who wrote the "Gospel of Phallus"? Why is he a credible author? Sincerely, Max Lamperouge