ISIS are not representing Islam

"Do you think the terrorists of ISIS are only killing non-Muslims?" I know that they kill other muslims but it does not matter as I explained previously ISIS claims that the muslims they kill are not 'true' muslims just as you claim that ISIS are not 'true' muslims. Just as catholics and protestants In ireland killed each other both claiming the enemy were not 'true' christians. It appears again my opponent has fallen into the scotsmans fallacy. Now I would rather not quote texts from the Quran as I previously explained it is a well known contradictory book, however you did ask me so here a few quick examples. Make war on them until idolatry is no more and Allah's religion reigns supreme - 8:39 Allah is an enemy to unbelievers. - Sura 2:98 On unbelievers is the curse of Allah. - Sura 2:161 Slay them wherever ye find them and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. - 2:191 Hopefully this debate is not going to come down to who can quote the most references from holy books to support ones side as that would be a waste of time as all quotes will be self refuting and contradictory, as is to expect from a book written in the 7th century by barbaric stone age people. You also ask for a reference to suicide bombing now because there weren't bombs back in the 7th century the holy texts obviously cannot mention it directly however "To him who fights in the cause of God, whether he is slain or victorious, soon we shall give him a great reward. - Surah 4:74" in my view this supports such acts. It outlines Martyrdom and demonstrates how those whom die spreading islam will be rewarded. "You claim Islam is the religion of violence. But if you are right, all religions are teaching violence." umm... no. I literally just explained straight after how the religion of Jainism is not. "Have you forgotten the bloodshed of the Crusades... No one thinks those Christians were representing Christianity" I have never heard anyone in my life (until now) claim that the crusades were not representative of christianity, in fact the catholic church has even admitted this and apologise for it (1), on the 12th of March 2000 the 'day of apology. I am as against christanity as I am against Islam (perhaps you should check my other debate out 'christianity is a force for good in the world' at http://www.debate.org... to see for yourself) however at least the church has addmitted and apologised for many of their transgressions unlike the Islamic community which as you are demonstrating denies it has any thing to do with them when it so obviously does. To your rant on what counts as terrorism, forgive me if I'm mistaken is this debate weather muslim violence means terrorism or ISIS represents Islam? Also what does the oppression of muslims have to do with whether or not ISIS is representative of Islam. I also feel obligated how you are purposely misleading the voters with your reference I just read the article on the ISIS training camps and no where does it even imply that these camps as you say "founded by America" this is an outright lie on my opponents behalf and should cast doubt on all other referenced as I do not have the time to check them all. You seem to have a vendetta against America and feel that they create and train ISIS purposely to discredit Islam, this is no more than a crackpot conspiracy theory and has no credible evidence for, thus that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Now how many suicide bombers have to blow themselves up screaming "allahu akbar"for people to understand they mean what they say, how many ISIS videos must be released of them decapitating people saying we are doing gods will for people to realise religion is the problem. source: 1. https://books.google.com.au...