Abortion takes the life of a distinct, living, whole human being

As my opponent accepted that they have burden of proof in the comments section, "Yes, I take responsibility to prove the proposition of the debate.", I only have to disprove one of his three points. First though I must show how early in the developmental cycle an abortion can occur. The first response pregnancy test can detect pregnancy 6 days before a missed period, and with more than 99% accuracy 3 days before a missed period. [1] This means that pregnancy can be detected pretty much instantly. After calling in an abortion appointment can be set up within a week, usually sooner. [2] For these reasons we will consider anything after 10 days fair game. I would like to first focus on whole. Whole: "All of; entire:" [3] This definition basically states that whatever it is it is complete. My opponent has labeled a fetus in any of the three trimesters, "It would include the first, second, and third trimester of pregnancy.", as a whole human. This means that if I can show that a fetus is lacking any parts that make up a human in any of the three trimesters I have won. (If my opponent can't thoroughly attack my case.) A fetus does not become a fully formed baby until the second month of pregnancy. Fairly simple. Until the end of the second month the child is not whole. Well within our time parameters. Even if it is a whole organism it is simply not a whole human being. To take this even further it will not even develop muscles till the beginning of the fifth month. The fetus/child can't even survive outside of the mother until it is seven months old, and that's with intensive care. I can't consider anything that would die without constant attachment to another object to be whole. If it were whole it would function on its own. [4] Next I will attack distinct. Distinct: "Recognizably different in nature from something else of a similar type." [5] If I can show that at any point after ten days a fetus s not recognizably different than any other fetus at the same point I have won. (If my opponent can't thoroughly attack my case.) A fetus does not develop fingerprints until six to thirteen weeks within pregnancy. [6] This pretty much rules out physical difference as the face is not really distinct from others for several months. [4] This leaves only difference in chromosomes unique life experiences are far away so this is the big differentiating factor. Unfortunately for you however there are only 8,338,608 different assortments of the 46 chromosomes that are inherited from parents. [7] This means that we are not distinct. With over 7 billion different people out there [8] (and quickly rising) a fetus could be genetically identical to a thousand other people (while those people were also a fetus.) I concede that they are living, but remember that I only have to disprove one of Pros three assertions to win. I look forward to my opponents rebuttal, and giving my own. 1. http://www.firstresponse.com... 2. http://www.americanwomensservices.com... 3. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com... 4. http://my.clevelandclinic.org... 5. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com... 6. http://everydaylife.globalpost.com... 7. http://www.sumanasinc.com... 8. http://www.worldometers.info...