Con Will Win This Debate

Here's something to listen to while I present my argument: http://www.youtube.com... As it were: 1. GammerA. My opponent has no proof that I didn't suddenly have a TIA while writing my initial argument. But, "is" does represent present tense. So there was a way of knowing what tense I was speaking in. And no, you, the voters will not be wrong if you vote that Con will win this, because he will. It's pretty simple: Vote for Pro because Con will win. At this time I'd like to politely ask my opponent not to bring his silly logical fallacies into this.B. Two errs made by my opponent does'nt outweigh all of mine. Therefore, I have worse gammer, therefore he will win, therefore I am right and you should vote pro.2. Souces (AKA: Bibliology)A. If my sources are relevant to my case as he says they are, then they support me. If they support me, then I am allowing Con's statement to be true. If I am allowing Con's statement to be true, then my sources aren't relevant to my point. In plain English: If my sources are relevant, then they are irrelevant. If they are irrelevant then I am correct. If I am correct, Con will win this debate. It's just that simple.B. If posting links didn't make you look sophisticated, you couldn't score by posting links if your opponent didn't, but you can, therefore posting links make you look more sophisticated.C. He just acknowledged it. Just now. You should take his keen skills of observation into consideration when voting on this debate.3. Conduct is for Weiners.A. I apologize for my round two argument as I paraphrased in my opening statement. I meant to say:"I wish my opponent best of luck [because he'll need it] and thank him for accepting this challenge [because if anyone else had accepted it, I might have lost]."B. Now that's just silly. C. My opponent is correct. I have failed to carry this argument in the same way his mother failed his abortion.4. Weiners are for Persuasive ArgumentsMy opponent isn't incompetent, he made a very good observation of this point. He's absolutely right. And because of that, Con should win this debate.And I'm not saying I'm Batman, I'm just saying have you ever seen Me and Batman in the same room together??5. I'm Becoming Quite Font of This DebateCon's concession implies that I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins therefore I win therefore he wins so vote Con to prove me right.6. It's Only LogicalMy opponent just countered my counter to his counter. Now that's just silly. Conclusion:Vote for me... because he's right... so he will win... so I'm right... so I will win... so he's right... so will win.I just wanna go home.