god

At this point it's become abundantly clear that IF my opponent was capable of giving his own argument about this resolution, he has absolutely no interest in doing so. All I am debating against is my opponent's ability to copy and paste from other websites. The last round that my opponent plagiarized is from http://www.hamzatzortzis.com....My opponent's last round can be summed up as follows: "The universe is fine-tuned for life, thus God exists". Hamza Tzortzis (the author of the actual argument my opponent copied), does an adequate job of explaining the second part of the argument, but not the first. In fact, Tzortzis doesn't show at all how the universe is finely tuned. He simply assumes that it is, and that people would agree with him. He provides no evidence to support the conclusion that the universe is designed, or finely-tuned, and thus, the first premise in his argument is false.How could anyone think that the universe was finely-tuned for life? There is presently one known area of the universe that is actually capable of sustaining life, and that's Earth. This makes up less than one trillionth of the universe that will not instantly kill life. The vast majority of the universe will kill all life instantly, due to extreme heat, extreme cold, or extreme exposure to radiation[1]. The universe is so large that it's impossible to even imagine, and humans can't live naturally in pretty much any of it. Does this sound like a "fine-tuned universe" that can support human life?http://www.youtube.com...So humans are capable of living in less than a trillionth of the universe, and this "Goldilocks Zone" isn't all that great either. For example, the Andromeda galaxy is predicted to collide with ours sometime in the next 3 to 5 billion years [2]. This will effectively end all life on Earth, that is, if the Sun hasn't already gotten to the point where it will be too hot to sustain terrestrial life in the first place [3]. Of course, this is all assuming that the Milky Way's galaxy orbit doesn't collide into a supernova that will kill all life before any of this happens at all [1].How exactly does this represent a finely-tuned universe? It can barely sustain life, and it can't even do so for a long period of time. If the universe really was created by an omnipotent and omniscient creator like my the website my opponent plagiarized from would have you believe, then why is the design of the universe so stupid? There is no conceivable way that the universe is finely-tuned for life, and my opponent is forced to defend this in order for his argument to stand.The second part of my opponent's argument is just as flawed as the first. My opponent claims that God is the only way this finely tuned universe could have come into existence. My opponent is committing the same argument from ignorance fallacy as he did before. He says that "It wasn't done by chance of physical necessity, and I can't think of a better explanation, so God must have done it". That is not an argument. That is an assumption based off scientific ignorance, and doesn't qualify as evidence in the least bit. Let's also not forget that my opponent included a total of ZERO citations to back up any of the claims that he made, giving yet another reason to dismiss his argument as a whole.To conclude, there are four main reasons why I urge a Con vote in this debate:1) My opponent is incapable of coming up with a single coherent argument on his own; he has resorted to plagiarism for each and every single one of the arguments that he has made.2) My opponent provides zero citations to support any claim that he makes throughout this debate.3) Half of the arguments that my opponent plagiarized do not even pertain to the resolution.4) My first constructive, which gives a specific example of how the universe could have formed from nothing, has gone unrefuted throughout this entire debate.Given all of these reasons, I urge a Con vote.I would also like to challenge the Pro for a second time to stop plagiarizing, at least for the final round.Citations:1. The Youtube video above2. http://en.wikipedia.org...3. http://arxiv.org...