Why is Evolution more popular than Creationism? You have everything to lose, as an Evolutionist.

"you would believe in Creationism if you were a Christian." But most of them don't. I don't see why this is so hard a concept to grasp. Not everyone takes the Bible as literal. Whether they think it symbolic, mistranslated or edited they don't believe in a literal creation story. First, I challenge you, can you find or think of one complete fossil that evolutionists call 68 million years old? " Here is one that I found from 100 Million years ago. It may not be a dinosaur, but it is complete nonetheless. (http://io9.com...) "I'm surprised that people believe that those fossil collections are legit...I think it's preposterous to believe that ANY fossils can survive for such a long period of time. How do you know the fossils are this old?" Here is how I know. (http://science.howstuffworks.com...) "You didn't give any evidence of one species changing into another. Can you? That would put a lot more perspective into your theory." I already did in my last round, (and it was ignored) but here are some more examples. (http://phylointelligence.com...) "The "contradictions" in the website you gave (at the bottom) answered for themselves. If you click on the questions, on your link, it shows the myth and the correct answer of the 2 contradictions below the graph!" You didn't look through all of them did you? Only certain ones have Biblically correct answer. (http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...) This one shows the contradiction of unforgivable sin. Note that it is not believing in evolution that is considered unforgivable, but rather blaspheming against the Holy Ghost. "The Liberals are more common, and you bet it's true that 99.99% of them aren't Christians, none the less Christians who really BELIEVE that God created the world and loves us all." (http://www.people-press.org...) "Also, what is taught in public schools, where half the nation's children goes? Evolution, not Creationism, and they are taught that it is fact, not theory. You can at-least admit that Evolution is a theory along with Creationism." Creationism has no scientifically verified evidence, therefore it can't be taught in science class even if it many people believe it. Evolution is both a fact and a theory. (http://www.nas.edu...) "But what's the argument here. It's why the majority of people take the risk of there being a God. On that case I will say that there is no good reason to chance it like this." Like I said, there are thousands of religions, and you have done nothing to separate yours. You also have failed to attack my argument that I can't actually believe in something that, well, I don't believe. You don't provide sources so I can't attack all of these vague claims, but I will attack the first two. 1.The prophecies of the Bible are self fulfilling. (http://news.google.com...) 2.Actually, if you know anything about an environment you can make reliable evolutionary predictions. (http://www.theguardian.com...) "Wouldn't it be logical to assume that if man's highly intelligent brain discovered the computer, than the human brain was also a product of design?" Here is how the mind developed evolutionarily. (http://www.scientificamerican.com...) My opponent has failed to provide evidence for creationism, or make his religion more trustworthy than any other. Whereas I have provided evidence of evolution and given discredit to the Bible. Therefore I urge a Con vote.