Legalization of suicide

"1) We don't have the authority to destroy our lives." Parents can't control our biological traits, but without them you won't be here. They passed all their genes onto you, and it depends on random luck which of the genes get activated. Parents are our creators. Moreover, the question of free will must come into play. My life, my rules. Furthermore, it doesn't matter who morally has the authority or not. If it can be done, it can be done. Thus, con's point is moot. 2) Human beings are the best resource a nation could have. That way India should be about 3 times better than the US. "Furthermore, I should remind him that he is arguing for legalization of suicide in it's entirety and not arguing that it should be legal in select places('suicide centers' as he says it) and illegal elsewhere " I am arguing that the act of committing suicide should be legal in all countries through the creation of suicide centers. Now, suppose I am taking a stroll on my lawn, and a dead body falls on me, wouldn't that ruin my day? Legalizing suicide that way would be absurd. 1) If farmers die, their lands would be given off to other farmers. And if all farmers die, then the country's government would take drastic steps and ask people to manage the lands and become farmers. Furthermore, there are quite few farmers compared to the citizens. Suppose if a few unemployed graduates die, would anyone care? Human beings give back less and take more, and are not a good resource. Moreover, people who are broken down to commit suicide may not be useful enough to the world, as with a weak will it is hard to do productive work. 2. My argument of suicide centers come into play here. 3. Suicide centers would only recommend joining the army, it is still an individual's choice. As for considering out of it, people feel less stressed when they reveal their problems to someone else, and who knows, all they lacked was some good old advice. Counter-Proposal: Surely I must use con's point here- "A person who wants to kill himself would kill himself not go to a place where he would be counseled out of it" Suicide centers would be a sort of counseling centers and if it fails, would help wrapping it up in a clean way. Con hasn't rebutted by point about property allocations. Legalizing suicide through my method should make sure there are lesser disputes over property after the death of the suicider, but if suicide remains illegal it will still cause property disputes. Another point is that illegal suicide cause inconvenience to the general public, and legalizing suicide would help get rid of that problem. Suicide centers would be needed as we can't randomly let anyone kill themselves on the streets. The resolution is "Legalization of suicide" and I propose to legalize suicide this way. Con's only rebuttal was that I said suicide should be legalized in all places, not select places, but I argue that it will be fully legalized in a countries which have suicide centers. It's like saying that since it is legal to drive, I can drive on anyone's lawn and drive over footpaths or crash into a building. There always have to be some rules, or else there will be chaos all over.