Make DDO Great Again!

I am the greatest DDO reformer that God ever created. You know why? I'm a very smart person. I went to the best schools. I'm a very smart person. And, I mean, part of the beauty of me is that I'm very rich. I like thinking big. If you're going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big. That is why I shall pitch the Muslim Ba- I mean- the Five Year Pl- I mean- the Cosmo Plan."The Cosmo Plan?" you're thinking, "What the heck is that?" The Cosmo Plan is the best plan in the history of plans. It'll be great, just fabulous! The objective of the Cosmo Plan is to reform DDO entirely and make it so that DDO is more sophisticated. The trolls are bringing DDO crime, drugs... but some trolls I assume are okay. So we build a wall along the border between intellectual debates and troll debates, and we make the Trolls pay for it! Brilliant idea, if I do say so myself! Also, I'll make the Troll ban, where we ban trolls from entering DDO.By the way, no, I do not have a wig. This is my real hair.Alrighty, with those political jokes out of the way, I'd like to suggest my real plan to "make DDO great again." Here are my biggest ideas on how to increase activity and the amount of sophisticated and interesting debates on this website.Point One: Fix the forfeiting glitchThis problem does not need explaining. This glitch, which prevents debates from continuing and ending, is hampering with the process of debating, hurting morale and discouraging people from wanting to debate on this website.Point Two: Allow people to qualify for voting without submitting their phone numberEight months ago, debates might have had voter turnouts as high as 30 people. Today, you'd be considered lucky to have over three voters. Most debates these days end up in ties because nobody votes. We need to increase voter turnouts by making it easier to become a voter.The requirement to become a voter as of now is to submit your phone number. Not only does this make some feel uneasy as it may seem as an invasion of privacy, but some people do not own personal phones and therefore will not be able to vote. Now, I don't believe that we should give everyone the privilege to vote because, of course, a person could then make alt accounts and vote for himself or herself on a debate. Perhaps, for ease of access to vote, a person must complete a certain number of debates before being able to vote. While this suggestion still opens up the possibility of voter fraud, because of our diligent moderators such as WhiteFlame looking after us and keeping a keen eye on voters and RFDs, I am confident that our moderators will be able to address voter fraud swiftly with effective punishments.Point Three: More Effective Punishments for TrollsI have mixed feelings on Joke Debates. If they're mild humor, then sure, I don't mind them. But when there are debates on "There should be a limit of one black family in every neighborhood" or the frequent debates with no purpose other than to criticize people such as the "Do Atheists Rationally Know Truth From Fiction" debates, the "humor" seems to fade away. These people don't set up these debates to do anything productive beyond getting the most outrageous emotional reaction from people. They demean the purpose of Debate.org, turning it into a troll website, rather than a hub to discuss important issues in a civil, sophisticated manner. I believe the moderators should take action and delete these types of debates and use more effective action against trolls. And then we build a wall, separating us from the trolls, and we make the trolls pay for it.