The United States does not need any more laws. We need to abolish laws that aren't necessary.

"Because you cant seem to respond to more than one idea at a time I'll break up my response for you. "Look jarhead just finish your rant against the government so that we can end the debate already. "What I am suggesting is that I have first hand experience with how irrational and mindless some government mandated rules can be. "What makes you so special exactly? EVERYONE has experience with what they consider to be stupid laws, thats no reason to not make anymore of them though. "If an 18 year old is required to abide by every law and regulation, shouldn't he or she be able to understand every word of it? "No, not at all. Babies also have to abide by laws and regulations but that doesnt mean the language of the laws should be made to that even babies could be able to understand them. .. . "LAWS SHOULD NEVER CHANGE SOCIETY. "Im sure the people in the South who wanted to keep slaves in the 1850's thought the same thing. .. . Seeing as how this is just another opinion though not based on any reasoning or anything ill just move on. "Could YOU comprehend all 906 pages of the "Affordable Care Act"? Can YOU give arguments relevant to the debate rather then just keep asking dumb questions? "Do you think that congress really has the best interest of the people in mind when they vote on bills? "Oh this will be hysterical. .. . "No, they don't (at least 90% of them) They go by what vote would look good on their record or what vote would get them votes from their party affiliation in the next election. How do you think those bills 'slip through the cracks'? They sure don't read them. They go with whatever their buddies are voting. "Seeing as how youve given no evidence of this at all, im going to once again go ahead and classify this as nothing more then a biased opinion and just dismiss it. .. . "You don't think the American public cares about due process? You think they don't care about the government detaining people that haven't been proved guilty? "Of COURSE people dont care about it, if they did then people would be giving a sh*t about it. Only a small fraction of people are protesting the bill at all while everyone else just strolls along in their lives since it doesnt effect them, so im going to guess that they dont care, ESPECIALLY when it comes down to handling terrorists (which is what the bill is about if you actually read it) " Let me get this straight. .. You think that because this group of people make terrible, unconstitutional, unjust, and morally corrupt laws, they should make MORE to try to counteract those? "They dont intend for them to be terrible idiot, they just turn out that way. They should be given the chance to undo their mistakes, because if they didnt then the provisions of the NDAA could never be fixed. .. . "I am not saying that the United States doesn't need more laws"Dude, read the title of the debate that YOU MADE. 'The United States doesn't need any more laws', its literally the exact thing youre supposed to be arguing. Ill count this as a massive concession then. " I am saying that we need to get rid of the toxic laws that are in effect today"Seriously, how do you think legislation works? The way to get rid of bad laws is to pass other laws that nullify them, thats how the government works. If you dont let the government make any more laws, then you are effectively preserving all the f*cked up ones to exist forever. Pro forfeits half the debate and then uses his own wild opinions against enacting any new laws, meaning he has not fulfilled his burden of proof.