porn to be made illegal

Thanks for the response Pro. I want you to know, that I had to cancel my beauty treatment to respond to this argument, so you should be deeply honoured."I don't find your puns particularly funny."Awww. Well, I guess it must be an 'anti-climax'???? <-------------"Take porn hub as an example it doesn't even ask for age confirmation let alone a credit card ."Ohhhh so you have been on PornHub? How was it? But, yes, it does not ask you to verify your age, however this is an anecdotal fallacy. Just because one website doesn't ask you to verify your age, does not mean that all are the same. And you dropped the argument about material porn ie. magazines etc..."To set restrictions on a mobile device you must do it manually this includes setting a password and disallowing websites."What's wrong with that? We are talking about a situation where parents would tend to dictate their children's lives... When they are purchasing the phone for their children, they could ask for it to be done, or pay a little extra or something..."Doesn't stop people lying , most people aren't found out."This is a claim drawn out of thin air... Again, many people don't get caught for purchasing alcohol illegally. This reason alone, does not constitute an entire ban on pornography..."My evidence for this is first hand, I know many people who have watched porn underaged, many for years however were never caught out."Can you please Google search what an "anecdotal fallacy" is, please?"The age limit on porn isn't as strict as it is on alcohol, as alcohol is brought over the counter."An other claim drawn out of thin air... Material porn can be bought over the counter. "Porn can be accessed online, yes there may be magazines but you would require a fake ID to purchase. Online people will lie about their age. You can't consume alcohol through a computer screen but you can access pornography."I didn't know that Pro speaks for all people... You can buy alcohol online... There's nothing stopping people from buying magazines for minors... You claim that all people would lie. You dropped the argument about how many websites require the user to pay or sign up with a credit card..."As I have already mentioned some software is manual & on phones there is a way to prevent your parents setting up restrictions by setting a restriction which doesn't affect your internet and setting a password, unless your parents know the password they cannot get into the settings."I have already provided a solution to this^. This is also an appeal to extremes fallacy. I don't see how this would prove that porn should be banned entirely..."I meant that parents cannot check their child's history to find out if that have been accessing inappropriate content. The IP address is recorded by the website, this will not inform the site of the age of the viewer."I am pretty sure that they can set up a firewall, to not allow people from accessing certain sites... There are other ways to snoop on your web browser. Call a technician, they can talk the parents how to do it, and could even set it up for them."This is irrelevant. Firstly cars are hard to fix unless you are a mechanic or know exactly what to do and how to do it. "You should refrain from interpreting analogies literally; they are metaphorical. "Secondly the internet and smart phones/devices are relatively new, some parents wouldn't have grown up in the society that their children have- as society is forever changing. If a parent isn't technology smart they won't know how."Pro has completely misunderstood the intentions of the analogy, and completely dodged the part where I said that they can get someone else to do it for them."Your puns aren't amusing. Pornography sites are blind to the lies as they trust people will be honest."My puns... My puns are dearly hurt by that. You are... You are condemned to 100 years of pornography marathons as punishment..."fake ID could be used"What? No. They have to sign a contract - they have to provide sufficient credentials to verify their age. They don't just take their word for it... It would be completely illogical. If you publish child porn, or are caught with possession of child porn, you will get sent to jail. It is not as simple as the person walks up to the counter, and shows them their drivers licence..."Please tell me the positives of porn."Not my burden of proof - that's a shifting the burden of proof fallacy... Well, I will just state the obvious priori; people find it pleasurable. They might find that the pleasure outweighs the other effects. They might not even be affected by the assertions that you posted earlier...You dropped a couple of arguments... And you didn't respond to how I said that you made your burden of proof impossible to achieve. Sorry, but the debate is over. Over to you, I suppose. Strange request, but can you respond to ^ right at the beginning of your rebuttal? Thanks in advance. You should try implementing puns... I have never heard of the 'pun fallacy', so you are all good to go! Hmmm, maybe it's sloganeering, meh.None of your arguments deduce that an entire ban is necessary... You even said it yourself! You negated the resolution!Over to you, Pro! Please don't let the puns get inbetween the argument, they are just there for a bit of 'fizazz' - to 'glitter' the argument, if you must.