Bombing Other Countries is a Good Way to Solve the US Debt Problem

As we all have read and seen, TheCommonMan refuses to acknowledge what I deem as the problem behind the US debt. The resolution does not say "Bombing Other Countries is a Good Way to Reduce the US Debt." The resolution does say "Bombing Other Countries is a Good Way to Solve the US debt Problem."TheCommonMan has gone on with his rebuttals nevertheless suggesting that I am not providing enough evidence to show that my ideas can reduce the US debt. I have never in this entire debate suggested that we should or should not reduce the US debt. TheCommonMan needs to show what problem the US debt poses, and what effect will be had by reducing the US debt.In order to better understand my argument let's take my opponents deductive logical statements and amend them with my real argument. A. We show compassion to other countries and inspire them to greater goals and feats for humanity B. A host of inspired and compassionate Engineers and Scientists will construct and program robots which do all the work for us. C. The ever growing US Debt will no longer be problematic in an economic market system where robots do all the work. This deductive logical view of my arguments is a completely valid and possible (if not likely) outcome of humanity's future.Once again reducing the debt is not the same as solving the problem."My opponent misses my point here. By using my opponent’s idea, we are imposing ourselves on other countries by forcing our help on them. Some countries might not want this help. Hence, by forcing compassion upon them, we are doing something to them that they don’t want us to do. This will provoke some countries. Also, by using this idea, other countries can’t just “turn the channel” as my opponent metaphorically states. If we’re forcing ourselves on them, they can’t just ignore it. For the above reasons, this idea that my opponent provides isn’t a good one."I would just like to point out at this junction that forcing compassion on someone is a contradiction. You can't be compassionate while forcing food down someone's throat. Obviously I'm not suggesting we do this. My general rebuttal is that we should create a culture that is full of inspiration and love, and then put it on the airwaves and internet cables so other people can view it."I have done all I need to in order to uphold my side of the argument, which is shoot down all of my opponent’s arguments and show that my opponent’s idea is not a wise one."TheCommonMas has not provided evidence showing how a reduction in the debt = a solved problem. He has not provided evidence showing how the spending cuts that have been made since 2009 have not been enough. He has not provided evidence that the spending cuts and tax increases he has suggested will work to solve or reduce the debt. He has not provided evidence to counter the idea that the debt might actually increase in the long run if his ideas are implemented. I have made all these arguments since my very first post, and TheCommonMan has done nothing but tell me how my plans can't reduce the US debt. I hope everyone can realize that this is weird. Thanks.(Btw, I also find it funny how he thinks that it isn't wise to create robots to do all our work. Maybe we'll let him stack bricks next to a robot in the future haha jk)