The Harry Potter book series is better than the Twilight book series.

Pro's Case 1) JK being killer happy with the good guys is not a good thing. Before we start claiming that Harry Potter is superior because all the good guys die, I have a question to ask. Exactly what purpose does killing the good guys have? The answer would be that it provokes an emotional response in the reader, usually one of sadness. But it is Stephinie Meyers, not JK Rowlings, who is the clear champion of producing emotional responses out of their readers. The entire story revolves around a sad love story between two people who live in polar opposite worlds. Would you call Harry Potter sadder than Romeo and Juliet? I daresay you would not because the fact is it isn't sadder. Twilight is the closest modern day Romeo and Juliet you will find, so it goes that it would be sadder than Harry Potter. This also makes Stephinie more talented than JK, because she was able to find ways to add sad elements to the story without killing off anybody. Stephine comes in with the double win. ..2) JK is a mythology nerd, so what. Most people will agree with me when I say that it is not the quantity of mythical creatures that is important in a story, it is the quality. Even though there is no man-eating snakes or sock loving elves in Twilight, the mythical creatures that are introduced are incredible. Stephinie goes into a great detail describing the Vampires and Werewolves and adds a level of detail and Character that JK's mythical creatres lack. As for background information, Twilight has its share too. Twilight takes place in a real location with real landmarks. Many of the types of ethnicities such as the Quileute tribe are a real group of people. 3) Twilight is imaginative too What I think Pro is trying to get at is that Harry Potter is more imaginative because it opened doors to other stories. If this is the case, then Twilight shares the title “Most Imaginative” with Harry Potter because it too has many possiblities for more stories. Stephinie Meyer has debated whether to continue the story with Jacob, Rennesseme, the Volturi, or any number of Character plotlines. She has even published a novel entitled The second life of Bree Tanner which tells the side story of another Vampire not associated with the main Character of Twilight. 4) Why you got be such a hater? In Pro's next argument, he blatantly claims “Twilight is written poorly, and we all know it. If you need any sources, please read the books. ” No, I did not know that it was poorly written which is why I am debating it. Also, I do not believe the readers are going to read the entire series just to see if your right. In the next round, I hope Pro gives actual reasons as to why Twilight is poorly written. Pro's next point is that since Harry Potter is written from third person and is unbiased, it is better. But for many readers, the exact opposite is true. People want to get inside the head of the Character and experience the same feelings and emotions the Character does. Writing from first-person actually helps the reader become more enveloped into the fantasy world of the Character. Twilight also shares its narration with Jacob and Edward diversifying the range of perspectives. 5) C'mon, give Twilight some credit While Harry Potter is certainly unpredictable, Twilight is not a “I saw that coming” kinda book either. In fact, one of its strong points is its unpredicatibility. An example would be the love triangle between Bella, Jacob, and Edward. The book leaves you biting your toenails wondering if Bella was going to pick Jacob or Edward. And neither was it blantely obvious she was going to pick Edward because Stephanie created a emotional connection between Jacob and Bella that left readers wondering who Bella loved more. There is also moments when you don't know if Bella or another Character was going to die such as when Bella met the Volturi. My Case As both Harry Potter and Twilight are both nonfiction books, I shall only being arguing the entertainment value of the books. 1 The fighting scenes Clearly in a nonfiction book, fighting scenes will be important. Unfortunately for Harry Potter, JK simply had no imagination when it came to fighting. The best the readers got where some balls of light being shot between the good guys and bad guys. C'mon, all Voldemort(Oh God, I said his name) and Harry Potter did was wave their sticks at each other and scream jibber jabber words like two fat guys fighting over a potato chip. At least Stephanie had some combat in her books. Her vampires actually ripped each other heads off which is pretty awesome. Werewolves trying to tear apart Vampires and Vampires throwing fireballs at Werewolves is way more epic than that humiliating crap JK tried to pull of as “fighting”.2 The Love Story Another important aspect of a good entertaining nonfiction story is the romance. Harry Potter didn't even find a girlfriend he wanted to keep for more than 2 chapters until book 6 or 7. And even at that, all we got was one sloppy kiss between Ginny and Harry. When reading Twilight, I almost fell in love with Edward myself AND I'M A GUY! !! Thats pretty good stuff. Stephanie masterfully recreated a modern day Romeo and Juliet that is indisputably better than that Harry and Ginny crap. Conclusion I have tried not to make my case too long so that Pro may be ableto rebuttal all my arguments. In the next round, I will bring up new points and rebuttal old ones. And with that, I turn the attention to Pro. ..