There's as much evidence that Wotan and Lord Krishna exist as there is that Yahweh exists

My opponent has failed to disprove Christianity. " The responsibility is not on me to disprove Christianity. You're the one asserting it is true without evidence, the responsibility is on you to provide evidence for your claim. By your logic, we should all believe in pink unicorns because we can't disprove them. "this is something which you didn't provide hence I mocked this action with a statistical claim. " I claimed that the Bible was contradictory and inconsistent and provided evidence, therefore this claim by my opponent is false. "you're failure in showing error is good enough for me. " It is irrelevant whether or not it is good enough for you. As I have already explained, you have asserted that the Bible is true, so it is your responsibility to provide evidence. In any case, I have shown error so this claim is also false. "assume Luke is recording Mary's genealogy. " Instead of assuming, provide evidence. Also, if there were 2 different lines of descendants, why is there some overlap? This is inconsistency "so was the virgin birth. " The virgin birth was the result of a mistranslation: Isaiah uses the Hebrew word 'almah' meaning young woman, which was mistranslated to the Greek word 'parthenos' meaning virgin. '"Independent evidence shows that this census was only a local census, and took place in 6AD, which is after Jesus was born. " Evidence please. ' Sure: . http://en.wikipedia.org... "You've shown great ignorance. " Likewise. Anyway, this is an assertion. You've persistently ignored my request to show that the Bible is true. "yes I am calling you a liar. " Go for it. It is of no consequence. With regard to secularism, yes it is recent, that's the whole point! Moral issues like the equality of women are nothing to do with the Bible. The Bible does not condone equality amongst men and women. Therefore our modern views contrast with the Bible. "No but bad arguments are bad, and your arguments were bad. " Assertion. A defensive assertion at that. "Christians knew whatever or not they saw Jesus. " Evidence please. From a source you can show to be accurate. My point about considering the views of uneducated people over the laws of physics. They were indeed uneducated, as most people in that place at that time has little education. The laws of physics stand up to even the most intelligent person alive today, why are you considering the views of non-scientists above demonstrable facts? This is ignorance to science. "but when it comes to Jesus for some reason there is an ample amount of evidence. " No there isn't. The Bible and some letters do not prove beyond doubt that the only conclusion to draw contrasts the laws of physics. This is horribly irrational, as well as ignorance of science. The laws of physics cannot ever be contrasted in any case. Why are you so happy to believe they were on anecdotal evidence? That is a huge claim with massive implications. The evidence for your claim is minimal and certainly not conclusive. You haven't even proved your main source (the Bible) to be valid. "Presenting this website to a Christian is like presenting Kent Hovind to an Atheist, simply inexcusable. " Assertion and ignorance. The website contained valid points. "Now your ignorance simply cant be ignored. I cant believe I am even bothering to debate this with you. ." If you read the Bible, you will notice that women are treated by men like their possessions. This no longer happens, ergo our modern morality contrasts with the Bible. "Koran isn't the only correct spelling. " Indeed, there are several, including Koran, Qur'an, K'oraen. Quaran (my opponent's spelling) however, is not. My opponent has failed tremendously to verify his main source of reference. He has not provided a single shred of evidence that Yahweh is more likely to exist than Wotan or Lord Krishna.