DDO Tier Tournament 2 (Round 1): Homosexuality Is Immoral!

I see that this is going to continue. In any case I win because you have broken a rule by not refuting my case. In any case I am going to refute Cresendo's case; I will not re-affirm my case as it stands uncontested. 5. "First of all my opponet says that luv is not a good reason too get marred but why do the vast major of people get marred its because they luv each over and gay people are the sam."I should like once more to point out that this debate has nothing to do with marriage, it concerns itself with morality. While whether gay people should be married is a legal issue, whether it is ethical to engage in same-sex is a philosophical issue. We are supposed to discuss the latter. Now the argument that Crescendo gives is that since the vast majority of people get married for love, gay people should be allowed to be married. This is false because[24] the vast majority of people get arranged marriages. The argument does not stand. In any case my opponent fails to connect his argument with the resolution. I never contested that gay people should not get married, I never endorsed that they should. This argument is a "besides the point" fallacy commited by my opponent. 6. "My opponet says that anything unatural is immoral butt in that case are cars immoral because walking is the nature thing to do and eating Doritos is immoral because Doritos are not nature."I never stated that that which is unnatural is an immoral butt, and I never said that that which is unnatural is immoral. I did however say that my opponent has to show why that which is natural is moral, especially since there are numerous naturally born people who are psychopatha, sociopaths, and killers. Lets also not forget that a lot of people naturally feel attraction towards children. Until my opponent can successfully show and justify his argument and connect it with the original resolution his argument hold no weight. In any case my above concerns successfully neutralize his argument.7. "You didnt quote Koran but your religion is the only real reason that you are opposed to homosexuality."I think I am going to call you on that and ask what proof you possess. From my argument can you derive any Islamic doctrine? In any case my reasons for disliking homosexuality can be found in Immanuel Kant's works. While the Quran is my holy book, and I will follow it religiously I do have non-religious arguments against homosexuality. Some of them were actually mentioned in this debate, had you cared to read my argument. I wont say this is ad hominem but it is a fallacy so long as I am not arguing from Shari'a Law. 8. "Also, prove that Im trolling you have no proof this is a horrid person attack!"A troll on DDO is one who writes very short arguments in a proper high class debate, one who does not follow the rules, commits ad hominem, uses bad spelling on purpose, et cetera. You have not followed the rules as you did not tackle my argument, your spelling when you want it is perfectly fine. Knowing that it is a sensitive word you spelled Koran perfectly even made the K capital. You commited ad hominem by calling me a biget (sic). This is not a personal attack because I am not abusing you or insulting you, I am accusing you. I accused you of being a troll and provided sufficient evidence thereof. 9. "If yup want proof that homosexuality is nature well it is proven that gay men have woman brains!http://news.nationalgeographic.com......See I provided sources so I am right and you are wrong and homosexuality is not a choice so do not criminate against them for doing what is nature."I think I have already shown that nature is not moral, and that you fail to give a proper, systematic argument. In any case here is the testimony of whiteflame a top debator here and a PhD Microbiologist. From his testimony we learn two things, that firstly Xq28 while it exists does not make a difference, and secondly any genetic activity or natural ability does not successfully control human psychology. In any case the source you cited is Natural Geographic which might be a popular science sight but is not in any way a research journal. These findings are still unders consideration and as The Karolinska Institute has not yet proven this. The argument also makes the mistake asserting that since the brain is different then gay people must be gay while it only accounts for better verbal skills and more emotion, nothing that makes you gay.[25] My opponent as you will see has not proved that his studies make people gay, only better verbal skills and more emotion on average. [25] http://www.shaktitechnology.com...10. "I await my opponent's response."I await my opponent's responce. Ajab