George W. Bush illegally stole to 2000 election.

"the story on GWB stealing the 2000 election has yet to be fully blown." These are the results from the Federal Election Commission, a Federally run non-partisan organization headed to ensure the equity of elections. http://www.fec.gov... If anyone was to uncover fraud of any kind it would be this group. Now I certainly don't think GWB has done a bang-up job in the White House. And I certainly would be deeply interested in prosecuting anyone found tampering with a federal election, especially one that has as deep and profound an impact as the presidential election. But so far you, along with other conspiracy theorists, have never presented any empirical evidence of misconduct or fraud. At most, you point to Katherine Harris, a Republican of Florida, and derisively refer to her as a "henchman," and Jeb Bush, a Republican Governor of Florida and brother of GWB. That is completely circumstantial. Unless you can make some kind of reasonable tie, its baseless speculation. "Gore won by a margin of 543,895 votes." It does not matter who wins the popular vote in America. I have long advocated that it should, but the US prefers the electoral college. The reason they do this is to give each state the same amount of leverage. Reason why is because the state of Rhode Island doesn't have anywhere near the same population as California. By winning states, it attempts to even the playing field for smaller states. "In the American system of presidential elections, the electoral vote determines the winner, and Bush won this count, although Gore received more votes (called the "popular vote"). This was the fourth time in American history that a candidate won the presidency without receiving a plurality of the popular vote; it also happened in the elections of 1824, 1876 and 1888." Source: http://en.wikipedia.org... "These are minor details trying to sidetrack everyone from noticing the main idea." It isn't a sidetrack and it isn't minor at all. I am explaining why Bush legally won the election. "But doesn't anything seem odd when recounting votes aka democracy, is declared unconstitutional?" Are you know indicting the Supreme Court in on fraud? It isn't odd that it be viewed unconstitutional if it is in fact unconstitutional. "If any State shall have provided...for its final determination of...the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State...at least six days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, such determination...shall be conclusive" - United States Code 3:5 "I like how you shed some light on the fact that it is greatly possible that he stole the election" I didn't say it was greatly possible. What I said was that if I were in Gore's shoes, I would demand a recount as well since it was so close. "which he did." Then by all means substantiate it. "All war-mongers are supposed to be liberals." Ummmmm... How do you figure that? Do you know what a liberal is? "Bush has made us forget that the Republicans hate war and that Democrats are for it." Bush Jr (R): Iraq, Afghanistan Clinton (D): Somalia, Haiti Bush Sr. (R): Iraq Reagan (R): Cold War, Grenade, Panama Carter (D): Nothing Usually we see that modern-day democrats, starting with Carter, are the very antithesis of it. In fact, isn't that what liberals usually charge conservatives with -- that they are too apt to opt for for instead of more diplomacy? My opponent quoted me saying: "In closing, my opponent made an audacious claim specifically aimed at President Bush. He then should provide unimpeachable evidence that misconduct has occurred in order to win this debate." He then retorts: "Why wouldn't it be? He is the one who stole the election no?" You haven't substantiated your claim, whatsoever! You are going to have to give myself and your audience something more credible than mere suspicion. Because if they glove don't fit, you have to acquit. :)