Capitolism is much better than Communism

I will be defending some of the critiques my opponent has made. My opponent points out that "in a communist society people also work for what they warn, so this is irrelevant, at it can be achieved by a communist society, as well." My opponent does not put any examples of people that have innovated in a communist society, therefore my opponent's argument is irrelevant and vague. I have pointed out in my case that capitalism brought IPhones, Computers, Beds, Toilets, and TV. I have evidence of the innovations, while my opponent only points to idealistic scenarios that if practiced would look at serious harms. My opponent argues that Laissez-Faire economics was not the best form of capitalism. "It was utterly abusive and led to the progressive era, which made United States a bit more socialistic than capitalistic.". Well, than I would argue that the benefits outweigh the harms, because it brought IPhones, Computers, Toilets, Beds, and TVs. Also, my opponent argues that capitalism exploits people, but than look at how communism exploits people. 65 million in the People's Republic of China 20 million in the Soviet Union 2 million in Cambodia 2 million in North Korea 1.7 million in Ethiopia 1.5 million in Afghanistan 1 million in the Communist states of Eastern Europe 1 million in Vietnam 150,000 in Latin America mainly Cuba 10,000 deaths "resulting from actions of the international Communist movement and Communist parties not in power."[4] My opponent argues that "Einstein was a socialist, Hellen Keller was a socialist, and George Orwell was a socialist. The only thing that is different from communism and socialism is usually the intermediate of a country from switching from capitalism to communism." My opponent's argument is invalid, because we are arguing communism, and not socialism. My point in Steve Jobs being a capitalist was that he actually did something. He actually started a company and innovated products. He was inspired by the American Dream. Arguing that a scientist was a socialist doesn't do anything. Einstein was a scientist, not a political scientist. Hellen Keller was a political activist, but did she contribute anything to society. All she did was try and convince people to become socialist, and write books. It is funny how you mention George Orwell, because he also agreed that communism could not work in a society. You can read his book Animal Farm. He tried to make a microcosm on what was happening to Russian people. He tried to show how fair share worked and nobody could work their way up in a society. My opponent argues socialism again, but that is entirely irrelevant to communism. My opponent argues that my logic is wrong because it was Nazi Germany that made innovations on films. " By the end of the 1880s, the introduction of lengths of celluloid photographic film and the invention of motion picture cameras, which could photograph an indefinitely long rapid sequence of images using only one lens, allowed several minutes of action to be captured and stored on a single compact reel of film. Some early films were made to be viewed by one person at a time through a "peep show" device such as the Kinetoscope. Others were intended for a projector, mechanically similar to the camera and sometimes actually the same machine, which was used to shine an intense light through the processed and printed film and into a projection lens so that these "moving pictures" could be shown tremendously enlarged on a screen for viewing by an entire audience. The first public exhibition of projected motion pictures in America was at Koster and Bial's Music Hall in New York City on the 23rd of April 1896." http://en.wikipedia.org... My opponent seems to have thrown analytics which not only are untrue, but feel like a lie. My opponent says that my argument makes no sense, when she even has her facts wrong. My opponent should not be trusted with the way she makes her analytics, because she even seems na"ve on her own subjects. My opponent argues that USA is now a blend of capitalism and socialism. Well, my opponent does not list any sources therefore her argument is invalid. And, even if it is true than 1. American Capitalism allowed this to happen 2. In communist regimes, the leaders begged for capitalism because they needed money. 3. Communist regimes killed a total of 10,000 people that tried to embrace another side which did not happen is American capitalism. My opponent also tries to argue "If you think that capitalism is good, then you should refuse to seek medical treatment in hospitals, because Socialist Nazi Germany made many medical advances." My opponent also admitted that socialism practices capitalism, therefore it is invalid. My opponent's arguments are invalid, because she lists no sources. My opponent argues socialism and her logic is flawed because she has to defend communism. Socialism does practice capitalism, so her attacks are irrelevant. I was listing what it would be like to live in a communist society. My opponent also tries to mention how people tried to overthrow the government because it endorsed Laissez-Faire economics, which was very abusive to people. Well, have you forgotten the millions of people that have died in communist regimes, and the millions of people that have suffered. There were people trying to overthrow the government. If you overthrow a communist regime, they will have you killed. Just look at North Korea today. My opponent also tries to escape realism by changing the rules this debate and saying we are debating the idealistic versions of communism. That goes against her own logic, because she just mentioned Laissez-Faire economics. You cannot just debate the theory in the books. If it has been practiced, than look at the results. Look at how many people have died in communist regimes. 65 million in the People's Republic of China 20 million in the Soviet Union 2 million in Cambodia 2 million in North Korea 1.7 million in Ethiopia 1.5 million in Afghanistan 1 million in the Communist states of Eastern Europe 1 million in Vietnam 150,000 in Latin America mainly Cuba 10,000 deaths "resulting from actions of the international Communist movement and Communist parties not in power."[4] I would be appalled if you are trying to escape this reality and base it off of pure idealism. It goes against your attacks, therefore your whole argument is invalid. Vote Pro, because Pro does not make up analytics, and Pro sources its information. Vote for the things that we need. Vote for the countless innovations that we still have.