American Culture has deluded what freedom is

So this debate is over from this point, although I will still take the time to address my adversaries points. My adversary states that the resolution is deluded but this is clearly false and a ploy to avoid my arguments in the previous round. The resolution clearly states Resolution - American Culture has diluted what freedom is [1] (per round 1)Note : My adversary accepted the debate and the rules therein listed in the first round. The title of the debate is not a resolution. The resolution is clearly listed in the Rules and guidelines in the first round which my adversary agreed to upon acceptance of the debate. After reading the rules and regulations in R1 he even chooses to define freedom in a manner of his choosing in which he states "I accept"As his first words. This is proof that he read the rules and agreed to the resolution that is stated in R1 which isResolution - American Culture has diluted what freedom is [1]Also I will direct you to the comments of this debate Myself - btw you worded the resolution wrong and i did not catch it lol. Its suppose to be diluted not deluded.Jif - Sorry for the S&G error. Just point that out.By acknowledging that there was an error in the title of the debate and that this should be diluted and not deluded, he is accepting that he is fully aware of this. He then in turns accepts the debate with the resolution and critera listed in R1Again note the resolution in R1 He also attempts to say that he is not fluent with English but this is prima facie wrong, per his ability and capability of comprehension that is observable. So there are a few courses of actions in which the judges can take from this point(a) Award myself conduct automatically for my adversary attempting to shift not just the BOP but the resolution of the debate *that he agreed upon in R1*, or factor this in to their decision in voting. (b) Disqualify him entirely and consider this an act of trolling, which would award me the debate. Agreeing to the resolution and acknowledging it, then attempting to change the resolution could be considered trolling and I leave that up to the judges. Due to the rules listed in R1 , my adversary choosing to troll this debate awards me the win automatically. In addition to this he lied about his ability to comprehend basic English which is another act of trolling. (c) The judges must dismiss every argument my adversary makes about *deluded* , because it is entirely irrelevant to this debate. Now on to responding to his argumentsR1) Everything about delusion or being deludedThis entire first part of his argument is entirely irrelevant to the debate and will not and can not be considered. This is not the resolution of the debate, so we can dismiss this entire part of his argument. R2 ) Defining FreedomThe first thing i want to note is that even if he were to (which he was not able to ) establish that freedom is an objective term and is not subjective, this would only refute 1 out of 3 of my main contentions and is still entirely irrelevant to the outcome of the debate due to the resolution which isAmerica Culture has diluted freedom[1]So now on to the refutation. Which there is really nothing to refute. My adversary attempts to define freedom in a way that establishes it as to act without constraint. The issue with this is that freedom is still entirely subjectiveEven if we acknowledge that freedom is the ability to act without constraint we then must ask a majority of other questions that cannot be determined objectivelyThe ability to act without constraint is still entirely subjective in the mind of the person that is acting. Constraint to one person may not be constraint to another, and the ability to act without constraint would have to be addressed with the question is someone actually constrained. If someone is not constrained in a literal or metaphysical sense, then the definition my adversary presents is irrelevant. The only thing this point shows it that freedom is still entirely subjective and differs from cultures and people.As I stated this is on him to show that American Culture has diluted freedom in every possible mind in order to uphold his BOP. We can even lay this out as another syllogism[P1] Freedom is an abstract thought/concept that differs from perspective and culture[P2] To show that American Culture has diluted freedom you must dilute that freedom in the mind of every possible person [C] Freedom can not be diluted because it is impossible to show that American culture has diluted freedom in the mind of every possible person. Restating contentionsC1) The process of diluting somethingdroppedC2) Freedom is subjectiveThis is addressed in R2 above and would be mute to type out again C3) Freedom is intangible DroppedC4) America fosters the Idea/concept for freedomDroppedConclusionMy adversary has attempted to change the resolution entirely. As I stated by agreeing to the debate and the resolution listed in R1 he is agreeing to that specific resolutionHe is not allowed to change the resolution because he openly agreed to it when he accepted the debate. Therefore all of my contentions hold and he has not upheld his BOP. In addition he has dropped every single one of my arguments, and tried to define freedom and still has not managed to do so. Let's review the resolution once more and the syllogisms that meet my burden. New Syllogism for subjective freedom[P1] Freedom is an abstract thought/concept that differs from person to culture[P2] To show that American Culture has diluted freedom you must dilute that freedom in the mind of every possible person [C] Freedom can not be diluted because it is impossible to show that American culture has diluted freedom in the mind of every possible person. First major syllogism [P1] Something has to be tangible to dilute it[P2] Freedom is an intangible concept[C] Freedom can not be diluted. Second Major Syllogism [P1] For the best possible freedom to exist, there must be a good cultural foundation[P2] The US possesses one of the best if not best, cultural foundations in the world[C] Therefore the US has the best chance of having the best possible freedomVote Con[1] Round 1 rules and structure