The Christian God does not exist

Thank you, Tyler, for your arguments. If it's all the same to you, I'd like to tackle them in reverse order.1. Omnipotence and logic are mutually exclusive.1. The Christian God is omnipotent.2. Logic Exists3. The Christian God has the power to do something logically impossible.4. To assert a being can do something logically impossible, is illogical.5. As is such, the claim of the Christian God is illogical.6. The Christian God cannot exist as he's claimed. I must say, I love the flow from premise 3 to 4. Your fourth premise "To assert a being can do something logically impossible is illogical" is surely spot-on, and I agree with it whole-heartedly. The only person here who's claiming such a thing, though, is you (in premise 3). Therefore, your argument is based on illogical premises.One example of the kind of thing premise 3 is talking about (that I'm sure we're all familiar with) is "Can God create a round square?" Well, what is a "round square"? The term itself is contradictory. It's meaningless babble. You might as well ask "Can God create a hurmoflurben?" It makes no sense.Another popular example is "Can God create a stone so heavy He can't lift it?" But the term "a stone so heavy [an omnipotent being] can't lift it" is just as nonsensical as a round square. These questions really aim to ask "Can God do something that God cannot do?" Well, no, obviously God can't do something He can't do.So when I refer to God as being "omnipotent" I do not mean omnipotent in the sophomoric sense my opponent does, which is maximal or absolute omnipotence: "able to do anything at all, even the logically absurd". I refer to common omnipotence: "able to do anything that is meaningful to talk about", or in other words, anything which we can logically conceive.2. Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually exclusive.I consider this argument as just an extension of the previous argument's flaws. Ultimately, it raises the question "Can God do something He knows He wasn't going to do?" Most obviously not, because that question doesn't even make coherent sense. It's self-contradictory and therefore as meaningless to talk about as a round square or a hurmoflurben.3. The problem of evil.1. The Christian God is omnipotent (all powerful), omniscient (all knowing), and omnibenevolent (has an infinite disposition to do good).2. Evil exists (Objectively so in the bible (Satin, for example), and subjectively so to the morale of an everyday person)3. The Christian God is completely aware of all evil, and has the power to stop it.4. The Christian God has to do good where-ever possible.5. The Christian God must eliminate evil.6. There is still objective evil according to the bible, and subjective evil to an everyday person.7. The Christian God cannot exist as he is claimed.What my opponent is trying to say (as highlighted by premise 5) is that he believes God does not have a morally sufficient reason for allowing evil (or what we perceive as evil) to exist. I'd like to ask you, Tyler, how could you possibly know this?Perhaps there is a higher purpose for "evil" to exist that we don't know of but God does, like when a toddler kicks and screams and cries when it gets its shots. Why oh why doesn't someone stop the evil doctors causing this poor toddler to suffer? Because, even though the toddler doesn't realize it, the "evil" that is causing him pain is ultimately helping him.To claim that the world's "evils" cannot possibly have a greater purpose is to claim omniscience yourself. Seeing as how the burden of proof is entirely on you in this debate, Tyler, you must prove to us how you could know God does not have a morally sufficient reason for allowing "evil" to exist.