It Is Unconstitutional To Ban Jews & Christians From Owning Slaves

Final arguments (Ill keep them short)1) "To prohibit Christians from owning slaves is a violation against their freedom of religion"I already showed how the Supreme Court disagrees with this statement after the Wisconsin v. Yoder case made it so that the US could create laws to limit the practice of religion if they had a good reason. Slavery being immoral, inhumane, and the cause of the Civil War is a good reason. As for the other ridiculous laws the Pro thinks should be legal, "As it stands the Supreme Court has found animal sacrifice to be constitutionally protected in the case, Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah. "The Pro is misreading evidence since that case was in court not because of animal sacrifice, but because the state of Florida created a law that completely forbade it only after learning that one church practiced it Basically, the law was repealed not because the Supreme Court legalized anmal sacrifice, but because the State of Florida made that law specifically towards one Church, and THAT was illegal. The US does not legalize animal sacrifice that the Bible condones. Argument 2)"There is no compelling state interest in banning slavery. People holding slaves does nothing to directly impact the stability of the state"Slavery does effect the stability of states, ever heard of THE CIVIL WAR? !? !? Argument 3)9th amendment: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. "Pro responded to this by saying "I don't see the words "right to privacy" in there. "Clearly the Pro cannot understand the meaning of words. .. .. .. .. The 9th amendment says that the absence of rights specifically written in the Constitution does NOT mean those rights dont exist. It basically states that if its not in the Constitution it doesnt mean its not a right. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. That includes the right to privacy. Argument 4)"It doesn't matter that the 13th amendment prohibits slavery"It kind of does since you want to legalize something the Constitution says is illegal. .. .. " That just means that people should require a bonafide religious reason to own slaves"Ok then, provide a bonafide reason. .. .. .. .. . Oh wait you cant. .. .. .. .. Your sole argument for why people should own slaves is because the Bible says they should, thats not good enough. Argument 5)Pro's response to the claim that all men are created Equal. .. " One can be a slave and still be "equal" in that the slave lives under the same laws as the master just that some of the laws may say things specific for the role of slave"Do you actually think about what your saying before you type it Pro? "Con talks about justice, welfare, and liberty. But the real injustice is that Christians and Jews are being prevented from effectively following their own religious beliefs"Not being able to follow religious beliefs never caused a Civil War Pro. .. .. .. .. .. . Want to know the one thing that did though? SLAVERY(By the way, how is not being able to practice ONE PART of a religion more unjustified then whipping slaves, making them your property, denying them the right to learn, the right to vote, the right to sue, the right to pursue happiness? )Argument 6) "Most Africans these days aren't really free, they are slaves to their environment and circumstances. "You know who else is a slave to their environment and circumstances? SLAVES. All of them! As for your claim that Africans arent really free, that is a biased, unfactually based claim. All in all, the Pro seems to fail to take into account how slaves are actually treated, how bad slavery was to this country, and how the Constitution works. I provided evidence showing how even according to the Constitution itself forbids slavery being allowed and why there is a good reason slavery is outlawed. In response to these arguments the Pro stuck his head in the sand and said how the real injustice is that Jewish families arent allowed to keep Africans as pets. .. .My advice to voters, read my arguments, and then read the Pro's arguments. If your still undecided, read the Pro's arguments again.