Matt Ought to Take his shirt off publicly

Thanks bsh.An Observation:The BoP lies on pro to prove why I ought to take my shirt off publicly. This is because a) he's making the positive statement and, thus, needs to prove that statement, and b) people don't just do things without reason. If he's not providing a solid reason, then at the end of the day you negate. Rebuttals to C1:There's a massive problem in this contention in that there are better alternatives to solving these harms than taking my shirt off. First, I can reduce suffering just as well, if not moreso, by just doing my job as vice president and improving the site overall rather than by taking my shirt off.Second, there are other alternatives to relieving sexual frustration, namely porn sites. That would be far superior to just me without a shirt on. Third, you can turn this in my favor. By taking my shirt off, I give into their short-term base desires. Once those desires are fulfilled and the hype gone, they lose their meaning for looking forward. The mentality will be "Well, I've already seen Matt shirtless, so there's no real point to caring anymore.". This would only increase people's suffering exponentially. By remaining clothed, I give people something to strive for in the future, thus increasing hope and decreasing suffering. Rebuttals to C2:ROFL.First, turn this entire fairness standard against him by him trying to blackmail me into giving him a prize that wasn't even offered. I concede that I do owe Brian $50 for winning the tournament, but $50 is not me shirtless. To force me to give into his base demands because "I owe him" is entirely unfair to me. As soon as he wants his prize, he can send me his address and I'll send him $50. Secondly, turn this against him as well. Asking for rewards that are outside of what was promised in the tournament spits directly in the face of said tournament. Given that part of bsh's presidential platform was to reviatalize and increase successful tournaments, his mocking of this one runs contradictory to his interests for a better site. If anything by me remaining clothed, I increase his ability to do his job as a president. Rebuttals to C3:This one is easily refuted in that there are better ways to go about building up the community than by taking my shirt off.First, not everyone wants to see me without a shirt on. Only appealing to a small portion of the site when I can do something that appeals to a larger majority, such as revitalizing the forums through topics of the week or helping the debate section by improving the tournament structure or by starting up a noob mentorship program, would go to farther lengths than by taking my shirt off. Second, the resolution specifies that I would be taking my shirt off solely for google hangouts, not for pictures or forum showing. This further excludes community participation to just nine other people at the most. The actual community building being done would be minimal if anything. Rebuttals to C4:Rofl...First, this is a misrepresentation of my words. By saying "can you give the VPs some love" I was asking if he was going to do a Vice-Presidents interview, while trying to be funny and witty as the same time. Second, even if his interpretation is correct and I am actually looking for love in that sense, I've already found it. My profile status has changed from single to in a relationship, meaning I've already found love. With this being the case, there's no need for me to take my shirt off now. Rebuttals to C5:Nah man. Not even.With bsh's entire case refuted, there is nothing left for him to possibly fulfill his BoP. Without that, he cannot physically affirm the resolution, meaning you can negate right here. But there are other reasons why I shouldn't take my shirt off, who's impacts outweigh the impacts of bsh's case. If my arguments outweigh his, then even if you buy his case, he still doesn't have the offense required to fulfill his BoP because the harms of me taking my shirt off would be more impactful than the benefits of me being shirtless.Contention One: RapeThe mere fact that this debate exists shows that I object to taking my shirt off. Otherwise, there would be no point to this debate and I would've done so already. Forcing someone to do sexual acts that they object to doing, meaning forcing someone to perform non-conensual sexual acts, is the definition of rape. The harms of rape are immense, including things like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Self-Harm, Flashbacks, Depression, Substance Abuse, Dissorders, Dissociation, and Suicide[1]. Inflicting these upon someone just for the base pleasure of seeing them without a shirt on is not worthwhile in any sense. Contention Two: ProfessionalismOnce people have seen you naked, it's kind of hard for them to take you seriously. This is especially true of people in influential positions[2].What's the harm of this? Because it hinders our ability to actually enact our platform to improve the site on multiple levels. First, it hinders our ability to negotiate with Juggle for improved technical aspects of the site that the community wants. Second, it hinders community building over things like tournament reformations and mentorship programs because the community won't take me seriously. Third, it hinders bsh's ability to enact things from our platform because my nudity is necessarily tied to him as a president (I'm his VP, after all). This means that if I take my shirt off, it becomes that much harder to enact changes to benefit the site and the community as a whole, meaning we can't fulfill our platform. Only through negating can we actually keep our platform as a possibility for success. Sources:[1] - https://rainn.org...[2] - http://popdirt.com...