BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Men and women are equal.

In this debate i am not wishing to argue what men can do that women cannot do or what women can do that men cannot do. I am supporting the fact that every men and women has a specific role to play in the society. I am arguing the fact that these roles played by both these genders are equal. The achievement of full equality between women and men is one of the most important prerequisites for global prosperity and the advancement of society. So as i have said above, every people has a specific role to perform in the society. . These roles are neither superior nor inferior. That is these are of equal importance. We cannot have a better world if there weren't either men or women. First think of a world without men (just imagine) --who will do the masculine works or muscle power works that are done by men. Thus men are important in the society. Now think of a world without women (just imagine) --who will do the household works that are done by women. This shows that women are also important in a society. So we can find out that both groups are necessary in a society and both genders are interdependent to each other. So this promote the equality between men and women and thus they are equal since both of them together forms a society. So this is just my introductional argument. My opponent should also introduce his points in his next argument. I would like to provide all the sources that support my argument in the last round. So i hope that my opponent understands my argument and come with his arguments in the next round. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
Men and women are equal.

That was what i introduced and explained that it should be based on the roles in the society.Well, you should've done that in round 1. You're supposed to let a potential opponent know what the debate is all about before they accept your challenge, and not in round 2.This is why I said I was misled. Anyways, let's have the voters decide when they award points for conduct, shall we?..my usage the site usage was almost same.Almost. Not exactly. You used active voice. Your source uses passive voice. That's all. I can't believe you didn't understand something this simple and that you fixated on this for so long.And, by the way, you forgot to use the conjunction "and" in that sentence. It's "my usage and the site". I'm sorry to point this out.Here i am focusing on works and not on wages.How can you say such a thing? Are you implying that wages have no meaning?Let me explain. Work and efficiency are analogous to distance and speed.Work - distanceEfficiency - speedMost jobs are physically draining. This means it is easier for men to perform them and not women i.e. in such jobs, men have higher efficiency. But both men and women work the same amount i.e. distance is same, but men have higher speed. Hence, men are paid more.But look at the fashion industry. Women have more demand(speed). Both work the same amount, walk on the same ramp(distance). But women are paid much more.But since most of today's jobs demand physical longevity and endurance, men(on average) are paid more than women. It's not because women aren't given equal rights. That's a big misunderstanding.I must point out that Pro never addressed my arguments over criminal sentencing and sexual assault....an equal role to play in society like cells for the body. Brain cells are more important than skin cells. I rest my case.In some cases, men are superior; in others, it's women. Both should have equal rights, but we'll never know who's more superior overall.The fact remains that in most areas, men and women are NOT equal.
Men and women are equal.

I have not made anything wrong. As i have said above you are the one who misjudged it. I have clearly made a sentence that the first round is for acceptance only. If you say that all is universality it is wrong,it is not the only meaning. ALL has a meaning of "extent of a particular thing or group". . https://www.google.co.in... So in this when we are saying all basis or bases we must specify a specific group or the segment it belongs to. That was what i introduced and explained that it should be based on the roles in the society. If i have not given that topic then we should debate on whether they are equal on growth,maturity,hair growth. .. .. Am i a fool to start debate on that topic. So you should understand that i am correct. You can't say that my usage was different. Because my usage the site usage was almost same. Please check once more. . http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com... You have explained in round two that what they do is equally important. Is it the wages what they do. You have said that"just by saying that what they do. .. .. " in your second round. The source tells that men and women are done equal works and paid different wages. Here i am focusing on works and not on wages. So i have argued against all the points to my opponent related to my topic. Now i would like to display some sources that would help to explain my argument. . http://www.meaningfullife.com... . http://news.softpedia.com... . http://womensrights.hubpages.com... So it is evident that they are equal but not given equal rights. So i hope all understood that men and women are equal. Each person men or women has an equal role to play in society like cells for the body. So thanking my opponent for a wonderful debate. And people should be on the pro side. .. .. ..
The character that I find best from naruto is better than anyone in one piece

sorry for my poor spelling I'm not worried about it that much thank you for pointing that out though I will answer your points 1-1 etc 1) I was using that statement as a example of his speed without any techniques involved if it did come down to that I think that minato would use his flying thunder god technique 2) yes I agree with you partially to your statement considering that akainu has incredible endurance that it would not kill but you have to take into factor the momentum he is gaining by incorporating the two moves it would most likely equal to the power dealt by white beards gura gura no mi 3) yes but they are only there to distract so in that amount of time minato could have a strategy 4) sorry about the error of the clan but according to the chakra basics everyone has chakra so it should be included in this debate and further more minato would have the ability to use sealing jutsu 5) reaction time is very important because with it you are able to for example the moment minato sees akainu raising his hand to do anything minato would be able to react to it sometimes even before it happens a sharigan is an example of a over exaggerated reaction time and so in essence by the time akainu's hand has even raised minato could be behind him 6) During difficult battles he was still capable of maintaining his composure assessing the situation and devising an appropriate plan of action. (taken from narutopeadia) also as I was saying before that it doesn't matter what he does minato could have already hit him and gotten out before akainu does anything and by reaction time he would be able asses these moves even faster by dodging them and noticing what they do to the surroundings now for your statements I will once again answer 1-1 1) yes that is true but I do not think that the fourth hokage would not notice the kunai knives melting he was considered a rare genius 2) as I stated earlier you must take into account the momentum of the rasengan hitting and the amount of times he can hit with it now for some of my points 1) Minato can also detect the presence of persons within an area by simply placing his finger on the ground so it would give him a tactical advantage at making a plan and pin pointing his location so therefore he could hit akainu with one of his kunai knives and hit him instantaneously before akainu has the chance to do anything 2)one of the main pointers that would result an instant kill would be the space time barrier it means that he could teleport akainu in water therefore winning the fight so now I believe I have the upper hand
The character that I find best from naruto is better than anyone in one piece

Thank you for accepting my challenge i look forward to hearing you thoughts on this matter alright I agree on the battle settings the character I have chosen from naruto is the 4th hokage minato I will start off by stating his abilities and why I think that they will make him the victor 1) he is too damn fast he is said to be able to out run a bomb without his technique flying thunder god ( his nickname "yellow flash of kohana") even proves this. also he has taken out entire armies with this tenique 2) he is the creator of the raseagan and if you were to combine the rasegan with the flying thunder god technique he would be able to do massive amounts of damage without his opponent being able to even see anything 3) I was reading your debate when you were debating that naruto would beat luffy (big fan) and about using the toads as a distraction minato could use the same strategy to beat Akainu 4) although it is not entirely determined in the latest chapters of naruto minato comes from the uzumaki clan members of this clan were very knowledgeable of fūinjutsu. This reputation earned them renown and fear worldwide, which eventually led to the destruction of Uzushio, and the rest of the Land of Whirlpools during the era of Shinobi World Wars. 5) he has seemingly instantaneous reflexes 6) he is able to see flaws and strengths in techniques after only seeing it once for example kakashi's chidori if you need evidence please tell me
The character that I find best from naruto is better than anyone in one piece

I will begin by thanking my opponent for this debate. ----- For this battle, I select Admiral Akainu [1]. I define his state as being alive and fully rested. I would like to propose another couple rules for this debate: 1) The battle for this debate takes place on a beach of infinite width, with a length of 30 meters between the ocean and the neighboring forest. Each combatant is situated 15 meters away from their opponent at the start, with the Naruto character's back to the ocean and the One Piece character's back to the forest. 2) Each debater may not change characters mid-debate. I look forward to this debate and thank my opponent for proposing it. ----- SOURCES: [1] http://onepiece.wikia.com...
"An adolescents right to privacy should be valued above a parents right to know."

adolescence is that period of a persons life wherein he is initially learning the art of decision-making.It is that stage of his life wherein the decisions he takes remain with him throughout his life and thus effect his life..At this point of time what he needs is someone mature to guide him through this process.Someone who could tell him that what youre doing is right or what youre doing is morally or legally wrong.Also due to the vulnerable nature of the child ,he is open to bad influence...
"An adolescents right to privacy should be valued above a parents right to know."

The right to privacy is an implied right from the 4th, 9th and 10th Amendments. Where does the Constitution imply a "right to know"? There is no such right; otherwise the entire purpose of a "right to privacy" would be meaningless. If I knew a secret and you wanted to know, I'm not forced to tell you. "Someone who could tell him that what youre doing is right or what youre doing is morally or legally wrong." Morals are subjective; my morals may differ from your morals. Let the adolescent decide for himself what is right and wrong. "Also due to the vulnerable nature of the child ,he is open to bad influence..." This argument only helps me. If he's open to bad influence, why have an adult give their opinion? They could be a bad influence.
The "Problem of evil" is not a valid argument against Theism

For centuries, The problem of Evil has been the champion in Epicurean Philosophy which then evolved into modern Scientism which is a philosophy that many people hold to today. I challenge that the Problem of Evil rather then being good evidence against the existence of God is on the contrary baseless and actually points to the existence of God. My opponent must show then, That the problem of evil is indeed a good argument against the existence of God.
The United States Federal Government ought to pay reparations to African Americans.

As a road map for the voters, I will first rebuild my case, and then attack my opponent's case. Justification 1: I will refer to one of my opponent's example, Beyonce. She was actually born in Houston TX, and now is a multi millionaire. The argument that my opponent has made against my case was not only proven wrong, but this piece of information goes against their evidence, who state that there is a slim chance that someone from the south has less that 5% chance. Second, my opponent states that a PERSON, not an African American, has less that 5% of reaching the top "quintile." I would also like my opponent to define "top quintile", because defining it as being on Beyonce's or Lebron James' level applies to everyone. Justification 2: My argument is completely valid. In Public Forum Debate, a plan or counterplan is defined by the NFL as a formalized, comprehensive proposal for implementation. The Pro team must focus on the resolution, ans not on a plan. Likewise, the Con must negate the Pro: not propose an alternative. This rule is meant to keep Public Forum ideologically seperate from policy, which the debate was sprung as a reaction from. I am not proposing any alternative, just stating the fact that the United States Federal Government ought NOT pay reparations because it would be too confusing to figure out who would and who would pay reparations, making my argument valid. This Justification still stands. Justification 3: Read counter-argument for Justification 2 Justification 4: My opponent has no proof that the people will realize what will happen is terrible. On the other hand, one of many examples of people going as far as killing people is the proposal of gay marriage. Many people who did not approve of gay marriage went as far as killing these gays and causing riots, therefore making this justification still valid. Justification 5: Once again, stating that giving money away did not help our country before does not offer an alternative. It just gives another reason why the United States Federal Government ought NOT pay reparations. Therefore all of my justifications still stand, because my opponent did not research well on the rules of PF debate. For more information on the rule my opponent and I are discussing about, please go here: http://debatepedia.idebate.org... and look for counter-plans in the rules. I will now address my opponent's case. However, in Round 2, my opponent has not rebuilt their case AT ALL. In other words, not only have they failed to destroy my case, they have also neglected their own. Because my opponent no longer has a case, or any arguments, left to destroy, Con wins this debate round. Thank you.
The United States Federal Government ought to pay reparations to African Americans.

For the introduction, I would like to point out that in the resolution, it states that The United States Federal Government ought to PAY reparations, not just "recognize those issues" as my opponent stated. Also, my opponent stated that if we argued against monetary programs, it would break the rules of the PF debate. However, the CON is trying to argue that The United States Federal Government ought NOT pay reparations to African Americans, which includes monetary programs. Having said that, let's move on to our opponent's case. In Contention 1, my opponent stated ONE example of how awards have not been given to any colored actor or director. However, their are plenty of other actors that have gotten noticed with an Oscar award, such as Hattie McDaniel, Sidney Poitier, Louis Gossett, Jr., and others. as listed here: http://www.uticapubliclibrary.org... In subpoint B of contention 1, my opponent stated that the average white person believes they experience more racism than the average black person. But this is only one example, and is only noticed because Taylor Swift is popular. If my opponent had given some statistics, say, the percentage of whites who think they receive more racism that blacks, then their argument would stand, but as of now, there is little to no proof supporting their claim. In Contention 2, my opponent said that Beyonce was the best human being on the planet. However, this is an opinion, not a fact. And Beyonce has nothing to do with our debate. Saying that Beyonce "only" gets $110.5 million shows that it is possible for African Americans to become multi millionaires. This also is biased, as I could point out many other American artists who's net worth income is less than Beyonce's. In conclusion, my opponent no longer has any arguments standing. Please vote for CON. I look forward to the upcoming arguments.
Jesus was a peaceful man

God wrote the Old testamentJesus is GodTherefore, Jesus wrote the old testament. Jesus performed the killings in the old testament."Did you know, for example, that God:Forced friends and family to kill each other for dancing naked around Aaron's golden calf?Burned Aaron's sons to death for offering him strange fire?Burned complainers to death, forced the survivors to eat quail until it literally came out their noses, sent "fiery serpents" to bite people for complaining about the lack of food and water, and killed 14,700 for complaining about his killings?Buried alive those that opposed Moses (along with their families)?Burned 250 men to death for burning incense?" [0]Then, there is the entire eternal damnation which didn't come up into the new testament. Yes, there was a Hell in the old testament, but you only went for a year or two. Burning people alive counts as violence in my opinion. "New American Standard BibleAnd the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are also; and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.King James VersionAnd the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever." [1]Finally, Jesus will fight the antichrist at Armageddon, including human followers. [2]" Still, the Antichrist and his minions, both demon and human, will be drawn to Armageddon for the Day of the Lord. ""Verse 10: However, His (Jesus’) sons (the Two Witnesses) will mobilize and assemble a multitude of (chayil) valiant forces. This speaks of the 144,000 Witnesses that Elijah brings together, and who are “sealed” by the angel of the Lord (note Revelation 7:4-8; 14:1-5). The Two Witnesses shall (bo) “bring in” great judgments that shall “certainly come and overwhelm and pass through.”"Impact, I have shown three ways that Jesus is a violent person. First, the killings of the Old Testament. Second, eternal damnation. Third, Jesus predicted fight with the antichrist at Armageddon. Thanks for debating. Sources0. http://skepticsannotatedbible.com...1. http://bible.knowing-jesus.com...2. http://www.christianrapturebooks.com...
Has Debate.org fallen in quality? (Gaming)

Hello user, I am here to say that the gaming section has not fallen and has good arguments. The gaming section has not fallen. Let's take a look here at your examples. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Your post in your first example has been taken from the opinion section of DDO. This is to state opinions. There is no evidence needed in these compare to the formal debates that are used now. Just because someone has an opinion in the OPINION forum does not mean they need evidence, as the name suggests. Opinion is defined as a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge From dictionary. com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The user was a troll for crying out loud. He hasn't been on since. His post was not recent as well! If we are talking the future and currently, this evidence is invalid. The user was either joking or it wasn't, he obviously left. The page itself was very formal compared to his one comment made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The person was specifically called out for this debate for saying this as well. The community knows it was improper. The page itself coming 4 years ago had lots of good responses for this. The site isn't falling in the gaming section! It has people who are suffistacated who dominate control the sections. This person was not a troll. He wasn't insulting anyone. Nobody would get offended by calling them a delusional fool I believe. His response was also modest as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You only limit yourself to the opinion section in DDO while there Forums and Debates are one of the best places to discuss games! The games page has been the only page to really survive in the forums! ! Mafia has helped with keeping players active. The debates for games also are really good as well. I have taken to time to read them and some are very intellectual In conclusion, CON limits himself to opinions when he claims DDO games section, in general, has fallen.
Has Debate.org fallen in quality? (Gaming)

I personally think Debate.org has fallen in the gaming section. People are making invalid arguments, having broken grammar, being rude to other people. I'll give you some examples. I'll respect your opinion if you don't think Debate.org isn't the worst site. Invalid arguments Example: "Roblox is a dopey, trash game. I played it one time, and never again. Only little annoying squeakers play Roblox. Minecraft is way much better even tho they are two much different games. Roblox is like a turd that won't go down no matter how many times you flush. Despite it being trash, it tends to linger like a bad odor." (From http://www.debate.org...) Comeback: Where's the evidence in it? Broken Grammar Example: "I FRATES JKLADSHLKJDHKDJSAGDSJKGDJKGJDHDHJHSDHDHDHDSHH g gg gg g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g gMINECRAFT SUX d and is gay hgjjhghjdff f f f f f f f f f f f" (From http://www.debate.org...) Comeback: Where's the proper spelling? Being Rude to Others Example: "Those Who voted 'No' are delusional fools." (From http://www.debate.org...) Comeback: You shouldn't insult someone just because they have a different opinion
The United States government should substantially strengthen regulation of immigration to the United

P1: The topic says regulation of immigrants TO the U.S, not IN the U.S. That does not mean regulation of United States citizenship. If that were the case, that would be the topic. P2: "notario fraud will prevent an individual who wishes to do so". If notario fraud prevents immigrants from wanting to come here, why would YOU (as pro) want to strengthen regulation against it? That would only make it happen less, which would allow for more immigrants to want to come. That's something that I should be arguing P3: Strengthening the regulation of immigrants TO the U.S. would not allow the "same platforms for immigrants that we have for American citizens", because there would be more control over them (who can come in, the conditions they are allowed in under, etc.) A stronger regulation would deter them from wanting the come. The reason most come to the U.S. is because the immigration system is as is. C: The U.S. government should not substantially strengthen regulation of immigration to the U.S.