The lord our god is NOT one lord according to the bible therefore everything god is, is false

You can toss out all the names you've come up with for your god because here's his real name according to your bible... Exodus 34:14 "For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:" OK we are NOT going to get into the trinity crap because you have no proof of it. Regardless, it doesn"t explain the "us", "our" and "gods". And the OT was written by DIFFERENT authors from those who supposedly wrote the trinity ideal thousands of years later who cannot stack upon whatever they wish for a language dispute. Also we are speaking of god only, not jesus who was clearly a false prophet, so everything stated about jesus will be tossed away. And really, YOU see jesus as---a--god, so that right there is more---than---one---god!!! And" John 5:7 "And there are three that bear witness in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." It does no good to claim that "Let us" is the magisterial "we." Such usage implies inclusivity of all authorities under a king's leadership. Invoking the Trinity solves nothing because such an idea is more contradictory than the problem it attempts to solve "'The Hebrew itself isn't so much the point as that the use of God's name seems to clarify the point it's making - that it isn't making a claim about how many gods there are, as such." Oh you don"t know that and since you don"t know that and it point blank obvious that you are 100% wrong because YOU did not in any way pay any attention to the videos who happen to be right. I really hate it when people like you run amok and invent excuses and or flat out lie for something in which they clearly know nothing about. . "and Jesus quoted this Psalm in John 10:34-36:" Umn no he didn"t. Not even close. OK that"s strike 1 for super bad misinterpretation. I decided to see how reliable your interpreting skills are with that jesus one, and wow did they SUCK. I mean where did you hamburger blackened ask that one up from? I mean you do fully understand that no god of yours would rely on text. NOTHING is established in scripture. That"s because the christian god, if remotely intelligent in which he is clearly not, would never use text as a source of communication, the worst form of communication possible so everybody can get it wrong. There"s translations upon translations upon translations upon translations upon copies upon copies upon copies upon copies upon dead languages upon dead langanguages with absolutely 0% of a chance to trance it back to the original as no original exists in the first place. So absolutely nobody knows if they are interpreting correctly. You especially don"t. "Now whether these are other 'gods' is a largely semantic dispute - it basically depends on whether you choose definitions for 'god' and 'angel' that have a certain amount of overlap." STRIKE 2. Where on earth do you come up with that one? Oh I get it, its another flatout invented excuse because in fact you have no idea, none as to what you are squawking about. NOWHERE in YOUR bible does it suggest ANYTHING like that. Period. "We"" Whoah there, its not "we", its you. Only you. You make up these broad ideals that nobody of merit will ever agree with and you expect me to fall for it. Sorry. But in this case, I agree, but curtail the "we", k? "have already seen that humans can be referred to as gods" yes, that"s in other religions. Sure. Awe well gee why not impersonate YOUR godOR someone or lots of someone"s call themselves YOUR god and get away with it. There"s been a few studs that have nearly pulled it off with battle scars galore (naturally all fake). jesus is one who is the most fought after figure in history. Hong Xiuquan is another who knew himself to be the younger brother of christ. Here"s a cute family oriented video" http://www.youtube.com... - jesus chinese brother Hong Xiuquan. And of course there"s Hitler a devout christian. After all its really quite simple" YOUR religion is based on YOUR god, in which you cannot even prove even exists, in having a superior ego complex in which YOUR bible is all about and nothing else, and though that its first comes power, then comes fear and then comes control. And pretty near all religions are created to explain the unexplained, just like yours. ("Well, not all subordinate in the sense of obedient - there are Satan and others" Oh I get it, so according to you there are others who are "obedient" to those such as satan, in which you cannot even prove exists, which means, according to you, that others are obedient to satan and not god which means that YOUR god is NOT in control of everything, does not know everything, is not all knowing nor all powerful - hey he cannot control satan, is NOT in charge of everything, is NOT omnipotent, and most certainly is not perfect. So since all of these things are true according to your fallout in which your obviously didn"t think of its cascade, then why would anybody want to worship this god(s) in which you cannot even prove even exists especially considering the fact that this god of YOURS is clearly imperfect and truly hates children? Oh but wait, you haven"t read YOUR bible at all to not know that. Oh and btw hopping around the bunny trail as far as translations really damages your credibility and integrity because who knows which version is correct? Because none of them are. See that"s what I truly hate about christians is they can"t READ. Do you know what READING is? You know. Words. Sentences. "In light of what's already been pointed out, your quoted scriptures from Part II could easily be argued to be simply making that same point - that God is above anyone else" That has 0% to do with it and also as pointed out in the video (in which you clearly didn"t watch either one, but your decided to run your furry tongue amok) its the same thing"So repeating "Indeed those are some of the verses and interpretations by god showing his superiority to other gods" Now you in being a christian, are you going to walk away and say hmmmm "how do verses like these make sense if other gods do not really exist? The ancient authors are not comparing god to imaginary beings. In order for these exaltations to be logical and non blasphemes to ancient israelites, the gods which Yahweh is compared to must be real." Then what was the purpose for the bible to mention them in the first place? And if they do exist, then its "gods" plural meaning many gods. "At noon Elijah started making fun of them: "Pray louder! He is a god! Maybe he is day-dreaming or relieving himself, or perhaps he's gone off on a trip! Or maybe he's sleeping, and you've got to wake him up!"" - 1 Kings 18:27 (GNT) Well duh try two verses prior "25 And Elijah said unto the prophets of Baal, Choose you one bullock for yourselves, and dress it first; for ye are many; and call on the name of your gods, but put no fire under." Likewise, Isaiah 44:13-18 but has nothing to disprove "us" or "our" and doesn"t prove a "god" nonetheless. Regardless worshiping idols is the most evil thing there is according to YOUR god and absolutely requires the death penalty, no exceptions, none. Deuteronomy 13 especially Deuteronomy 13: 9-10 and Deuteronomy 17: 2-5 which basically says the same thing. So you follow your god"s orders and coone down here and kill me for the simple reason that I don"t believe and am trying to sway you. Your god is a true darling little diseased maggot to incorporate such hideous absurd laws like that one and there are hundreds more. "Note that part of the common understanding of monotheism is to believe in one God that is all-powerful - the existence of other powerful spiritual beings less powerful than that God does not contradict this definition," But you never explained away the "us" or "our" or "gods" by any means. Its plural folks, meaning more than one god. Your god would not use text in any way to create all of this unnecessary confusion. Now please watch the videos in which you clearly didn't do.