Vaccines are Dangerous!

I am going to start out by addressing some of the claims that Con made. Con said "Vaccination has decreased the rate of disease dramatically." and the source was immunizeforgood.com. I read the link and it gave no proof that vaccines were the cause in the decrease of these diseases. Anyone who has studied statistics knows that correlation does not imply causation. Did you actually read this link before posting it on this debate? Con stated that "The studies brought forth by the Pro were largely discredited amongst the academic community." yet gave no proof. Which one of the studies I gave your has been discredited and why? Don't just make things up, if you're going to state something like that I expect some proof. Con needs to give some evidence of his claim or retract that statement. Your first CDC link sent me to the web-page that said there was no link between vaccines and Autism. This was one of the pages sources was https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... If you read the study the problem is that it didn't test whether or not thimerosal was safe. It just said that even with the decreasing use of thimerosal in vaccines autism is still on the rise. That's because vaccines are still being used. This proves nothing, please read the study yourself. Another study that was on the CDC page you had a link to said that kids using vaccines with thimerosal had the same chance of autism as kids using thimerosal free vaccines. This doesn't prove vaccines are safe it only proves that all vaccines are equally bad. Your IOM link did not work. Your jpeds link didn't work for me either. The second CDC link you have said thimerosal is not dangerous, and its source was the first CDC page you sent me which makes no sense. Why did you give me the same source twice? The second IOM report didn't work. The third CDC link sent me to a site that had a list of studies. None of the studies I read said that vaccines were safe they concluded that there was not much difference between vaccines with thimerosal and thimerosal free vaccines. Again this doesn't prove vaccines are safe. What's worse is that Con's link to some of the studies said "there was a small association between early thimerosal exposure and the presence of tics in boys" and another said "The study found only a few statistically significant associations between exposure from thimerosal and neuropsychological functioning" so not only do these tests only compare vaccines ingredients with other vaccine ingredients, they also show that thimerosal could be more dangerous than thimerosal free vaccines. Your fourth CDC link sent me to more of the same websites! Again, the only proof was a study of thimerosal vs thimerosal free vaccines. This only proves that all vaccines are dangerous. The fifth and final CDC link had no studies and it only gave the list of ingredients in vaccines. If anyone takes the time to read the ingredients you will quickly realize why vaccines are dangerous. Con said "I'm going to ask my opponent to read these articles before he continue spouting random fallacies in his refutation rounds." I've read all those links and commented on each and every one of them. None of them prove that vaccines are safe or effective. Con said that I was spouting random fallacies. I love debating people with different views, but if you're going to make a claim like that you've better have some proof. Con needs to either give an example of where I "spouted" fallacies or admit that he lied. Then Con says that vaccines are cost effective. His example is directly out of the immunizeforgood.com link he first gave. These statistics are completely made up. They are only somewhat accurate if vaccines are exactly as effective as manufacturers claim, and if tons of people were to get sick without vaccines. Again, no evidence for this is given. All these numbers are completely fictional and drawn from hypothetical estimations. Con has utterly failed to refute my proofs in the last round and I answered every one of his claims and links. I've showed why they don't prove that vaccines are safe, and am still waiting for Con to address the studies I gave in the last round. I think this debate goes to show that vaccines are dangerous, and I look forward to refuting any other claims that Con tries to make in the next round. Thank you!