The UN should be disbanded

Thank you The UN, was established originally to protect and preserve peace around the world. A noble cause if any. An example of the nobility of this cause would be the Korean war. When North Korea invaded their neighbor South Korea, unprovoked I might add, the UN sent in peace keeping troops to repel the North Korean incursion and defend South Korea. This was the UN at their height. However, that was many decades ago. Now, the UN is more concerned with meddling in first world affairs, promoting diversity while only representing one ideology, recognizing enemies but doing nothing about them, and attempting to maximize it's influence over every other nations government even though it has no business in doing so. Truly the UN's hypocrisy can only be matched by it's incompetence. Meddling in first world affairs- The UN was mostly intended to preserve peace in third world nations. This was quite obvious considering that all of the top nations in the UN are first world countries. However, in recent years, they has been more focused on first world problems then third world problems. As example, the UN attempted recently in the past 2 years to internationally ban small arms. I'm not sure what your view is on firearms, but would you not agree that it is up to the people of that nation weather or not they should be allowed to own firearms and not the UN? Also, this ban was specifically targeted towards the U.S.A( the most well developed nation in the world) Proof that they are more focused towards first world nations then they are third world nations. The UN promoting diversity while only representing one ideology- The UN has on many many occasions made a call to promote racial, religious, cultural, and political diversity. Lets focus specifically on the last one, political. If the UN really wanted to promote diversity, don't you think they would remain neutral on all stances except wars and abuse? If they did not, then wouldn't that mean that they have a specific stance on issues, and when there is a specific stance on issues, then there is a specific stance on in politics. Can you guess what side of the political spectrum the UN leans to? pro homo sexuality anti gun believes in global warming pro abortion believes that social security is a right Recognizing enemies and doing nothing about them- The UN, it saw the malicious attack against South Korea by their Northern neighbors and responded immediately by sending troops to the south's aid. Compare that to today. We know for a fact that Iran is building nuclear weapons. We know for a fact that Iran is funding dozens of terrorist cells around the world. We know for a fact that Iran has threatened to destroy Israel and America (both UN members)with these nuclear weapons and terrorist cells.The UN has recognized all of these things, and has done...embargoes and economic sanctions. If I were president, and this might just be me but when a nation is threatening 'NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION' to me and my allies, my first thought is to defeat this nation 'MILITARILY' before they have a chance to destroy us. That might just be me though. The UN trying to maximize it's influence over nations governments- Take for example, Liberia . A nation that was once in turmoil. You could not turn on the TV without hearing about a new uprising in Liberia. This was the case over a decade ago. political and economic stability have been reigning ever since the British took out the west side boys rebels. So why the hell is the UN still in Liberia? I have a personal Friend living in Liberia now who tells me that the UN has a say in nearly every single law that is passed in Liberian politics. The nation is stable now, and not because of the UN, but rather British support. So why the hell is the UN still there. The answer to me seems most likely that the UN is attempting to obtain power where ever it can. I do await your arguments.