Islamic Scripture is from God

Thank you, my dear rival, for reacting so promptly.Furthermore, I have came in my life across many people as my opponent, who claim to have found contradictions in the Koran. They mostly quote a verse - or just a part - and set something by it or try to manipulate the readers so it will look a bit immoral...My opponent is doing quite the same... His argument would be perfectly in shape if the verse would read thus: "And He has created horses, mules and donkeys, all in natural willing obedience, for you to ride and use for show...".Or thus: "And He created wild horses, mules and donkeys: prepared for riding just after capture..."This is not so. The argument is lame and manipulated. Nevertheless I admire his courage to try it. I would not be able to do so...Secondly, it is clear my opponent is not Shakespeare. He does not seem to recognize the difference between 'heavens' and 'earth'. The Koran states that the heavens are made in seven layers, not the earth. And the Koran is not even specifically referring to the atmosphere while stating thus."And indeed We have adorned the nearest heaven with lamps (stars)..." (Koran, 67:5)This means that the entire observable universe is in fact the closest of these seven heavens... And nothing in the field of astronomy rejects the existence of another form of universe (multiverse, as the theory is called) outside of our observing.Next, the exact definition of perfect, Oxford Dictionary says: 'having all the required or desirable elements, qualities, or characteristics'. The exact definition of imperfect, according to Oxford, is: 'not perfect; faulty or incomplete'.Allow me to give an example.If one creates a robot to serve people in a restaurant (which happened quite a time ago) and he lets him serve a couple in a restaurant, when he sees this happens just as he wanted it, he calls it 'perfect'.When the robot explodes while carrying the plates to the table, it didn't go as planned and the test was 'imperfect'...Though, when one invents a new bomb or explosive, and tests it; when it explodes, the test was 'perfect'. When it doesn't, it was 'imperfect'.Whether something is perfect of imperfect, it depends on the goal with the creation.And God's goal is different with every person.For example, some people are born blind. We could call this imperfect, but this might be a test for them AND their parents. Some people blame God or even forsake Him when something undesirable happens to them. Those who do so, didn't pass the test and have committed an 'imperfect' reaction. Those who succeed to remain having faith in God, with or without the gift of sight, hearing, two legs or arms, and so on: they have committed a perfect reaction...As for his pointing of the Hadiths, he seem to think that those are perfect. We do NOT believe the hadiths are perfect, because they are written by a man, you see. The Koran also refers to the healing of natural products as honey (as in 16:68-69) but says their is simply a benefit.Perhaps our Prophet (peace be upon him) has slightly overdone it, to know for sure his people would not play with it, but if God wills, He may cure a man having him eat grass...Then, my opponent gave something very interesting, one of the most interesting I have ever seen. I thank you for that, this helps me to remember to think about my own Book, and not only that of others.He states that God contradicts his own Words in the Koran by stating in several places that if He would, he could have a son, but then says that He cannot have one without a wife.This verse is responding to the religion that is popular for saying God has a son: Christianity.The Koran says that the People of the Book (Christians/Jews) started accusing Mary, mother of Jesus, of having committed adultery (i.e. with Joseph the Carpenter) while the Koran clearly says it is not so.They didn't believe that Mary could have a son without a husband.But these people do believe that Jesus is the son of God. So how could He have a son without a wife, if Mary couldn't have a son without a husband?It was a simple indication, understandable for man. Interesting question, nonetheless... Then, I would like to say, I sincerely doubt whether my opponent has a diploma on Arabic Poetry or even reads and understands Arabic. If I am mistaking, do correct me.This challenge is not to the Muslims, this challenge is to the Arabs, for all of them were lovers of poetry in the time of the Koran's revealing. And any true Arabic poet, Muslim or non-Muslim cannot deny none of this work is better than that of the Koran.You gave me these imitations, I do read and understand Arabic on a low base, and to my opinions, these don't even come close to the beauty of the Koran.But do carry me an absolute proof of someone, who is not Muslim, graded in the knowledge of Arabic Poetry and who can say that those chapters are better than those of the real Koran.Now, my opponent still has two rounds left to give me some contradictions I cannot solve.Good luck.Peace upon all who reads this.