The black community needs to change their current behavior trend

I would like to apologize for my rude first interaction and approach on this debate. What i will do in the first P1 I will break down your arguments from round 2, in P2 i will present my arguments and in P3 i will give you something to think about for the next round. I think you might have misunderstood my act of aggression reference, what I meant is that any act of aggression, that being passive or active stirs this type of behavior, the act of aggression as you can see it's seen as an outside stimuli (non-blacks). I believe you have given good examples in this regard (Baltimore, Ferguson); but if i were to give you a simile in this regard it would be like throwing a rock in a pond, sure the effect is greatly accentuated at the place of impact where the stone fell but the ripples spread trough the whole lake. Their people are like water, very easily stirred by anything, which is why this behavior exists. I do not want to call it a good behavior but nor am i saying it is bad. But suppressing it for future generations, all it will do is perpetuate this way of living. If these events happen (Baltimore) that create great civil unrest within the black community it will only be to benefit of that community, forming a historical past which in the from which lessons can be learnt in the future. We all learn from mistakes, it is only fair to let them do these mistakes also. I know it seems like something nonsensical but believe me if my son does not learn from my mistakes i will let him do them also. Some people have this type of learning curve if you were to call it that. "As of now, 76% of Americans oppose race-conscious college admissions, which factor skin color into whether you get into college or not. This is a travesty. Making distinctions based on race is also know as RACISM. So I don't know what 'denial' you are speaking of, but this sure sounds likes quite some denial of non-minority students who work their tails off to get to college." You might have misinterpreted this paragraph but i will explain it to you. It makes reference to opposition of race-conscious admission; that means they do not want the admissions to colleges to be depending on race (76%). It does however show that there are people (the 24%) that wish the admissions to be depended on race. And in this you have to take into account a few things such as census location, recorded personnel (some might be too old to go to school), and some institutions are made specifically for those type of minorities. I see nothing wrong with that. P2. I would argue that their behavioral trend is just an active way of themselves expressing their minority mindset, but it seems a bit far fetched. I will try to explain myself by using one thought experiment and logic examples/facts. Baltimore is ranked as the 5th city in the US with 63% of its population being black or African american only [1]. That means a large percentage of the police force, political reps, business owners and so forth are of that descent. You can say that white or non-blacks are the minority there. Education wise, 86% of the enrolled students are of African descent [2]. Let's keep these 2 statistics in mind as we continue. You would argue that the majority of the population is fairly educated in those parts, yet they resume to this types of behaviors. Here is why this type of behavior should condoned: 1. Oppressing and secluding their right to express selves is against the human rights Freedom Of Expression; 2. Internal turmoil and civil unrest resulting in propriety damage or human loss creates a history which if documented can be analyzed and conclusions/teachings drawn from (can be used for other studies); 3. A key factor to take into consideration is that the individuals participating in these events are not always the originators or originating from that region. Therefore not all African american are entitled to that criminology mindset (he's black he should change his behavior) 4. An individual or group of individuals that initiate these type of "events" and participate in, only display immaturity which future promotes point 2 referencing education through experience/history. Let's do that though experiment now. If you as an individual stripped of all your previous experiences (wipe your memory type of case) were to start life again. The other disadvantage is that you are an adult with adult responsibilities. I will argue that you as a sentient being (with your free will) will make the same mistakes (to some degree, i bet you won't fall off the bike) and create the same circuity in your brain memorizing all of your mistakes in the hopes that you will not do them again. Now apply this experiment to the current situation that is going on in American (and around the world). It is the same notion, let them have the history in order to learn. P3. I mentioned that I will leave you something to think about. Even if everything that i have covered here you completely disagree with and you have all the accurate rebuttal arguments, consider this: Behavioral activities are influenced by mental capacity which in turn is delegated by past experiences. Removing the most critical one (experience) will have the chain reaction seen above. Please read carefully through this before posting your response. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org... [2] http://www.ed.gov...