You are invited to attempt to prove the existence of your god

It may not be science's purpose to disprove a God theory, but it would appear to be atheism's and since atheism is based purely on scientific proof the two will become intertwined especially within the context of this debate question. Religion makes no contradictions upon this point though, religion is not about proving that its God/God's exist, they are based upon the 'faith' of that God's existence. Both science and Atheism though seem to be in a state of denial though, as they both seem to refuse to acknowledge that they are too based upon 'faith'. There is currently no scientific or atheistic theory which can disprove a God theory because as of yet they have still not created a theory which can definitively state how the universe 'began'. Ideas that things can start without a beginning have no proof and are not rational, the big bang theory (initially thought up by a priest) seems to be the most rational theory of 'how' things happened, but I nor anybody can hold up any idea as fact if we as a species were not even in existence when it occurred. As I have stated all scientific law is not infallible it is subjective to contradiction and the fact that invisible laws cannot be tested, only the effects and regularities can be studied. You assume evolution to be true as I am assume God to be existent. As I have also said upon accepting this debate proof in the context of a God is irrelevant and cant exist, can you prove to me that you love your mother, it is unprovable through scientific law but that does not make it less of a truth. Atheistic theory is inevitably based upon the fact that everything since and between the universes 'beginnings' as being without any intervention, without any purpose and being all random. I subjectively cannot believe in such claims. Which will bring me on to Material vs spiritual in terms of us as human beings. Material mind would be a mind based on scientific theory, a mind that has evolved and exists without divine intervention, we are functioning beings who live and die. If materialism is true, then your mind is nothing more than an emergent property of your brain, or it is one and the same thing as your brain. If materialism is true, then irreducibly non-physical minds/selves cannot exist. If materialism is true, and all that exists is matter and energy, then all knowledge should be reducible to knowledge of physical/scientific facts. For instance, all knowledge about the experience of pain should be reducible to facts about the stimulation of peripheral nerve fibers, the signals they send to the brain, etc. If we knew all those relevant facts, then, according to materialism, we should know everything there is to know about the experience of pain. A material consciousness is where we experience life through our five physical senses. We judge and evaluate in accordance to what we can see, smell, hear, taste and touch. Spiritual mind would entail that we are much more, we have a consciousness which has not merely evolved but rather has been created by a creator and it has a purpose, such emotions as love, jealousy, pride, the adoration of beauty ect cannot be defined as just material and are rather totally subjective and totally individual. A spiritual consciousness is experiencing life through spiritual discernment, insight and revelation. We see past the physical form to the spiritual essence and Source which created the form, and of which the form is made. Our human minds are what truly make us unique and unlike any other species on this planet. The fact that we have the ability to question is solely a human characteristic. Like atheists, the issue of people believing in God seems to bother them greatly. What is it about atheists that they would spend so much time, attention, and energy refuting something that we don't believe even exists? What causes you to do that? If we were all as science claims, such emotions are contradictory, they go towards proving that we are not random