(Pro) Atheistic evolution vs Christian creationism (con)

I believe that the universe and the world and everything in it was created by the almighty God of the Christian Bible. However, for any belief to be rational, there needs to be reasonable evidence. The Bible mentions that creation itself is evidence of God (Psalm 19:1-6, Romans 1:19,20).Below I will list just some of the reasonable evidence for the belief that God exists and that He created the universe.The facts below point to a Creator of the universe: The law of thermodynamics (Physics) First Law: Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; energy can only be transferred or changed from one form to another [1]. If energy cannot be created, the universe could not have created itself or come into existence by itself. All energy in the universe had to be put there in the beginning. The Bible give a clear indication that God did it. Second Law: The entropy of any isolated system always increases. Isolated systems spontaneously evolve towards thermal equilibrium [1]. Objects in the universe are constantly burning out and cooling down, eventually all stars will burn out, including our sun. The stars have not yet burnt out and we're slowly moving towards a point where they will be burnt out. Thus there is a beginning to the universe and it is moving towards and end, and thus the universe is finite. It had to be created by a being greater than the universe itself. Radioactive Decay: All radioactive elements decay and ultimately become lead [2]. This shows again that there was a starting point to the universe as radioactive elements are still decaying from a certain starting point. A supreme being had to put the initial amounts of radioactive elements there to begin with. The law of causality: Considered to be fundamental to all natural science and it states that every effect has a cause [3]. Since matter and energy cannot cause itself into existence, there had to be a greater cause for its existence, which again points to a very powerful and eternal God. What does all this show? The laws of physics shows that the universe could not have created itself (that it could not have come from nothing) and that it is not infinite i.e. it had a beginning. If it had a beginning and could not have come from nothing or itself, then it is perfectly reasonable to believe that God, who is almighty and infinite created it. Why would I come to that conclusion and not assume that something else defied the known laws of physics and science to create the world? The Bible says He created everything and the Bible itself provides very reasonable evidence that it is truthful, correct, internally consistent and historically accurate. Some reasonable doubts that living things came about by itself, without a divine Creator i.e. God: Male and female counterparts to most living species. Did the male form evolve by itself and the female by itself? It would seem much more convenient if mating rituals, wooing, courtship etc. was out of the equation and all living things had only one gender. Why would a system based on survival of the fittest have opted for such a complex convention? Why do plants rely on wind, bees and other animals to pollinate if it would be better that they could pollinate themselves? God intended it this way (Genesis 1:27) Animals and humans dying of old age. Why is there an expiry date built in for all living things if the goal for all living things is to survive and thrive? Probably the most obvious attribute I would identify as being an effective element in preserving a certain species is to make them live much longer and procreate as much as possible in its long lifetime, instead of being pre-programmed to get old, weak and eventually die. Irreducible complexity [4]. A spider, for example, has a gland filled with poison and specifically designed poison ducts that allow the poison to move from the poison gland to the fangs, and into its prey [5]. If its poison developed first, the spider would die from its own poison. If the poison gland developed first, how many generations would it take before the poison developed within the gland to justify the gland and the poison ducts and the mechanism behind the way the spider squeezes the venom into its prey? Spiders would have to carry these precise mechanisms, which are useless them, for countless generations while it awaits a complex venom to develop. Have a blessed new year.Sources:1: https://www.boundless.com...2: http://www.ccnr.org...3: https://en.wikipedia.org...(physics)4: http://www.ideacenter.org...5: http://animals.howstuffworks.com...