The Ancient Hebrews Worshipped an Imaginery Volcano God

I apologize for any confusion that may have resulted from my two made up verses and my 'analysis' of them. The shepherd was merely an example.For starters, I will post some (actual) descriptions of YHWH that are not volcanic in any form to emphasize my point, in no particular order. I don't have to show that YHWH was more probably a specific other thing, merely that he was not a volcano.Non-volcanic Descriptions:1 Kings 19:11-13'(11) And he said to him: Go forth, and stand upon the mount before the Lord: and behold the Lord passeth, and a great and strong wind before the Lord over throwing the mountains, and breaking the rocks in pieces: the Lord is not in the wind, and after the wind an earthquake: the Lord is not in the earthquake. (12) And after the earthquake a fire: the Lord is not in the fire, and after the fire a whistling of a gentle air. (13)And when Elias heard it, he covered his face with his mantle, and coming forth stood in the entering in of the cave, and behold a voice unto him, saying: What dost thou here, Elias? And he answered:'Volcanos are anything but gentle.Psalms 90:2'(2) Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God.'Exodus 25:8'And they shall make me a sanctuary, and I will dwell in the midst of them:'Volcanos do not dwell among people.Other things that I feel ought to be noted:Worship of Volcanic ActivityIs incredibly unlikely. If I saw a huge blast of lava coming right for me, I might think it was the work of God, but not that it itself was God. This is especially important considering verses like Deuteronomy 6:4, which would not be the case if every blast of volcanic activity was God.Worship of a Volcano ItselfI feel more evidence is needed that the volcano itself was actually considered a deity. If I lived on a fault line and was constantly bombarded with earthquakes and simultaneously writing some book about God, I might describe him as a mighty God whose footsteps shake the earth or something, just because I am familiar with earthquakes as powerful events.In addition, even attributing volcanic activity to YHWH wouldn't by necessity make him a volcano. After all, the creation of the earth was attributed to him in Genesis, but volcanos can't create life. Attributing other, non-volcanic acts to a 'volcano God' would cause him to move out of the realm of a 'volcano God', even if he retained volcanistic characteristics.Then you've got what my opponent wrote in Round 1: 'The ancient Hebrews moved on to more pleasant land, leaving their 'living god' behind'. That right there makes me doubt that the volcano itself was authentically worshipped. If they thought the volcano was really God, they probably wouldn't have left it, and thus leaving it implies that they didn't actually think it was God.Random Rebuttal:Pro writes 'On the contrary, the Hebrews did not know what a volcano was and that is proven in the fact the Bible does not contain the word 'volcano' or any word for volcano.'That proves nothing except that the Bible does not contain a word for volcano.Conclusion:I have seen little evidence that YHWH was a volcano. While it is possible that such is so, I have not seen what I think is sufficient evidence to say that it is more probable than not.Additionally, since plenty of non-volcanic behavior was attributed to YHWH, I find the theory as put forth by my opponent to be improbable. Not impossible, but improbable.Thank you.