Muslim women should be able to wear hijabs/headscarves wherever and whenever they want

Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to this debate. I represent the side that would allow some nations to ban the scarf that covers the head and neck of a female individual of the Muslim faith. Clarification of the Burden of Proof I, Con, must assert that there exist situations where wearing a Hijab should be against the rules. Nonetheless, Pro has to actually prove that absolutely no rule, of any kind banning the wearing of a Hijab in a location (or within a set time at that location). My Contentions 1. Any privately-owned organization, or house, should be permitted to dictate the dress-code of that facility. 2. Islamic legally forces non-Muslim women to wear the Hijab and thus should expect equal force pressed upon their people in nations founded on other faiths. 3. Knives, and a variety of other weapons, can be concealed beneath the Hijab. 4. There is no more likelihood of Islam being correct than most other religions. I shall now proceed to provide reasoning and proof for each contention. Contention 1 This is based on the fact that there are no laws prohibiting a private organization from dictating what the individuals within its premises wear (as long as they are not demanding them to be naked with minors present, although many nudist families ignore this law and raise happy children into healthy adults). The fact is that if you own a building, those wishing to enter your premises are either trespassing [http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...] which is not necessarily going to end you up in prison but, in many nations would allow the owner of the property to quite literally do anything short of killing you and win the lawsuit. On top of this, if one works as an employee in the private organization, the employer literally has zero restrictions on what severity of uniform they wish to go to in order to have the employee fired on grounds of disobeying them. [http://smallbusiness.chron.com...] What Pro is saying is that in all the situations where the laws of the majority of non-Muslim nations would fully allow a private organization, or property of some kind, to set a policy whereby the Hijab were not allowed be worn, the Muslim women entering that premise should magically have the supreme privilege to wear their Hijab "whenever and wherever they please". This is not only unjustifiable form a legal standpoint but morally unjustifiable to the hard-working owner's of the private property who are being forced, against their consent, to submit to the whims of these Muslim women. Here is an example of a teacher in the UK being forced out of the school due to her refusing to wear the Hijab [http://www.telegraph.co.uk...]. This was a state-funded school in Britain. It was not even a privately funded one. This indicates that Muslims are clearly aware of the freedom of an organization to have its own clothing policies. Contention 2 Saudi Arabia actually forces most regions to have the entire face-covering Niqab but what is a concrete rule in the society is that if a female isn't wearing a minimum of Hijab, they can literally be lashed and thrown in prison (which, in Saudi Arabia, is not very Human-Rights oriented). A Sudanese woman put on trial to possibly face public flogging. [http://www.huffingtonpost.com...]. Worse things probably happened in Saudi Arabia but they do not have free press whatsoever so we can never know for sure. Aside from this, any employees in any workplaces in Islamic nations generally are forced to wear the Islamic dress code. If a Christian woman wishes to show her cross then she'd better hide it under the veil. If this sort of mentality is taken in Islamic nations to the dress-code of non-Muslim faiths then why should it be unforeseeable that the reverse harshness should be allowed? Contention 3 This is simple logic. If there are turban bombs [http://news.blogs.cnn.com...], women literally killing husbands with burqa-concealed knives [http://www.dailymail.co.uk...] posing such a severe threat that any women wearing the Niqab or Burqa are being seriously considered (very recently) to be forced to sit in a separate enclosure during parliamentary conferences in Australia [http://www.theguardian.com...] then the next step to bypass security would be knives and smaller weapons concealed in Hijabs (it just hasn't been done yet because Niqab and Burqa bans haven't been effectively enforced outside of France). Contention 4 Unless Pro can provide proof of Islam being more probable than other religions, there is no reason for nations founded on Christianity or Buddhism to permit the Islamic way of life if Muslims have no respect for the non-Muslim dress code in their own nations.