Greece should exit the Euro

First I think its important that we define the resolution:Greece - a republic in SE Europe, occupying the S part of the Balkan Peninsula and many islands in the Ionian and Aegean Seas.[1]Should -must; ought (used to indicate duty, propriety, or expediency): [2]Exit - to go out; leave.[3]Euro - in reference to the EU[4]I would also like to clarify: The country of Greece is not leaving Europe, that is both physically and realistically improbable.Here are my following contentions:1) Moral Obligation: Now its important to realize that 'Should' refers to a moral obligation or duty, thus we are evaluating whether or not they have a moral obligation to withdraw from the EU. So as a criterion to evaluate their obligation I will use Kants Theory of Good will: "We begin with the concept of that which can be conceived to be good without qualification, a good will. Other good features of human nature and the benefits of a good life, Kant pointed out, have value only under appropriate conditions, since they may be used either for good or for evil. But a good will is intrinsically good; its value is wholly self-contained and utterly independent of its external relations. Since our practical reason is better suited to the development and guidance of a good will than to the achievement of happiness, it follows that the value of a good will does not depend even on the results it manages to produce as the consequences of human action. Kant's moral theory is, therefore, deontological: actions are morally right in virtue of their motives, which must derive more from duty than from inclination. The clearest examples of morally right action are precisely those in which an individual agent's determination to act in accordance with duty overcomes her evident self-interest and obvious desire to do otherwise. But in such a case, Kant argues, the moral value of the action can only reside in a formal principle or "maxim," the general commitment to act in this way because it is one's duty. So he concludes that "Duty is the necessity to act out of reverence for the law.""[5]Ultimately what we have to look at is the impact of them Greece leaving the EU on everyone else in the EU, Because the Euro's value is determined based off of the collective properties of all participating nations we see that all other nations are collectively harmed by Greeces continued Participation.Thus because we are morally obligated to act in favor of good will, they are thus morally obligated to withdraw to benefit the rest of the EU.So in essence they should Exit the EU.Response to Disadvantage 1)You provide no reason that this is a disadvantage, people will still trade and commerce benefits capitalist societies when they attempt to recover.Response to Disadvantage 2)This again doesn't seem to even tie into any moral obligation thus it falls.Response to Counter Plan)This again would mean that Greece is acting in self interest and this violates their moral obligation to act in the interests of the EU.[1]http://dictionary.reference.com...[2]http://dictionary.reference.com...[3]http://dictionary.reference.com...[4]http://dictionary.reference.com...[5]http://www.philosophypages.com...