Evolution should be taught in all schools, contrary to creation.

You seem to have misunderstood. What I said was not "We should be taught that there is no god." but "We should be taught what we know and not creationist myths that have their proof based on a book". I've never said "there is no god", and would not wish to dictate this statement to anyone; but I would say "the existence of god is extremely improbable", and such improbabilities are silly to believe in. As for the Christianity, I never said that it was the sole form of creationism; I was just using an example. If you wish I could be more general: creation states that the universe and everything included was created by an all-powerful being. And that this all powerful being answers the question of "where do we come from?", when in reality it does not. In fact, it raises an even larger question than it tries to answer "Who designed the designer?". As Dawkins explains in his book The God Delusion, a being which is capable of creating the universe must be more complex than the universe itself and also must have an origin.You do have a point, there are creationists who would accept the idea of evolution and the age of the earth. For me and I'm sure quite a few scientists and sceptics, what denounces the creationism theory is not evolution. It's the argument I presented in the last paragraph. It's the Boeing 747 gambit turned around. And evolutionists do not say that life came from nothing. Evolution started as soon as a chemical reaction was able to produce the first self-replicating molecules. As for the start of the entire universe, I am quite content with saying "I don't know.".You also seem to be under the assumption that I am closed-minded and spoon-fed information, which is ironic and false. Science is evidence based, and if a scientist was to be proven wrong, he would gladly accept given enough hard evidence. Whereas the typical creationist would dismiss the proof and / or logic given to him which could easily debunk his theories. Easily de-bunkable and unhelpful theories and this attitude should of course not be taught in a classroom.Actually, according to Moses; adam's creation is absolute: 4004 BC. Which puts us at a tiny bit over 6000 years. And again, the Christian account of creationism is an example chosen for it's huge influence on the world, especially considering the amount of Christians and creationists in the world's superpower. You also seem to be making the assumption again that I'm being spoon fed this information. Do you really think that I was simply told "Here's the date, no arguing, accept it." like creation tells us? No. I was told about radiometric and geological dating which are proven to be accurate within a error radius of a few millions years or so. I analyzed the data I was taught, and weighed mountains of evidence for science on one side, and an abscence of evidence on the other side. I'm sure you can guess which one won that. Your last statement simply confused me, of course I'm against all accounts of creationism, be they Christian or not.Finally, let me talk where I live, which is France. France is a completely secular society. Be you catholic, protestant, jew or atheist, no one will care for what religion you are. Furthermore, theology to my knowledge is not taught anywhere in France as a non-optional course. In fact, visible religious symbols are banned from being worn in French schools. And 45% (largest percentage) of French citizens are Christian, mostly catholic. This in my view is how schools worldwide should be.