911 inside job

"Once again Con has totally ignored my source and has pulled out debunking911.com which claims the only evidence I have to prove thermite existed is a photo , one which I didn't even claim as evidence for the thermite theory."Your own source didnt even suggest that thermite was used at the twin towers, it only stated that severely high temperatures were observed during the fires to have caused some of the chemical reactions that occurred. In fact if you actually READ YOUR OWN SOURCE (im guessing you didnt), only one person SUGGESTS that thermite COULD have been used in 9/11.... Thats hardly 'evidence' of anything. 'Iron rich microspheres with chemical signature of thermite found in wtc dust.'Your source is actually an experiment carried out by the same guy from your other 'source' who was the only person suggesting that thermite was present at 9/11, and you can tell hes insanely biased and making up his reports since his final words in his alleged study are: 'I am confident that by working together and seeking the facts with determination, we will succeed in finding out the truth about 9/11. If we act before the next series of restrictions on our liberties, we should be able to achieve justice and peace as well'Point is: Your sources are all coming from the same hack scientist and it still doesnt account for how much thermite would need to be present to bring down both towers (half of the worlds supply) "Steel beams found by fema corroded by thermite."Your source is the EXACT SAME ONE you used in the previous round which AGAIN only has one person claiming that thermite must be responsible.... "High tech nanothermite found in all WTC dust samples."Another study also by Steven Jones, the crazy guy pro cited in all of his other sources. Is this the only half-credible person you can find to back up all of youre insane theories Pro? '2. Im an idiot for asking why steel engines vaporised into thin air ?'No, youre a retard because I already stated that pieces of the airplane were found all over at the site of the crash at the Pentagon, and rather then put two and two together and think 'oh, maybe the engines were there and broke into a billion pieces after they hit the side of the building going hundreds of miles an hour' you instead went on this idiotic tangent that has gotten you nowhere. '3. Osama denies being involved in 911'Yeah he did at first like any criminal would, then after about 3 months once he realized he was just out of reach of the US he claimed responsibility and started bragging about it. '5. The point was to show that building damage doesnt prove a building will collapse at freefall acceleration'Your point was that SHORT buildings do not collapse at freefall acceleration, you completely refuse to acknowledge the fact though that it happens with large buildings that have sustained massive damage.'For the building to collapse at free fall speed indicates there was no resistance ( 0 N ) .... only which could be allowed if all columns and support beams were removed during the 'collapse'Unless youre retarded (probable) you would know that its possible to fall at free-fall speed if 1) There is extremely little resistance to stop it (It doesnt HAVE to be just 0), and 2) The object that is falling is MASSIVE and therefore would need massive amounts of material just to put up a little resistence, which is the case with both of the towers. "7. Why did i see a great big fireball'Because you have eyes and thats what happens when things go boom idiot.... 'and even if there was jet fuel it wouldn't be able to produce the temperatures high enough to melt steel."You dont have to melt steel to cause the building to collapse though, if you weaken it to the point where it deforms then the steel loses its strength even though it hasnt melted. Take weak steel and put the top 20 stories of either of the twin towers on top of that and its a guarantee that it will collapse. '8. RJ lee report found vaporised lead and molten molybdenum which require temperatures hotter than the surface of the sun .'It literally says nothing about temperatures needed to be as hot as the suns surface to have caused some of the chemical reactions found at 9/11=========================================================================================Apart from only giving sources all of which cite one insane loon, pros sources dont back up any of his ridiculous claims and drops numerous arguments while once again failing to suggest who could be behind such an intricate plot. Also pro, I dont call you retarded because I dont have an argument and have resorted to bullying.... Im calling you retarded simply because you are very, very retarded.