Biblical Errancy

Thank you for your rebuttals.I. JESUS' GENEALOGY DISQUALIFIES HIM AS MESSIAH My contention in this wasn't the contradictions surrounding the lineage, but that both lineages prove Jesus is not the Messiah, my partner still doesn't grasp that. Because the contradictions are irrelavent, I'll concede the point that the two lineages are not contradictory, but just for a sake of time and space. "I don't know from what version you copied the Lukan genealogy, but- "Jeconiah (also called Jehoiachin and Coniah)...(without Jeconiah as evidenced above) establishes His genealogical qualification as the Messiah. "I'm referring to MATTHEW's genealogy, not Luke's. My partner still hasn't refuted the fact that Luke uses Nathan and not Solomon; hence Jesus is disqualified. Here it is in syllogism form: The Messiah must be a descendant of David and Solomon. Jesus was not a descendant of David and Solomon. Therefore, Jesus is not the Messiah. This view allows easy resolution of the difficulties surrounding Jeconiah (Matt. 1:11), Joseph's ancestor and David's descendant through Solomon. In 2 Sam. 7:12-17 the perpetuity of the Davidic Kingdom though Solomon (vv. 12-13) is unconditionally promised. Jeconiah (Jehoiachin) later was the royal representative of that line of descent for which eternal perpetuity had been promised. Yet for his gross sin (2 Chron.24:8-9), Jeconiah was to be recorded as if childless, and no descendant of his would prosper on the Davidic throne(Jer. 22:30). This poses a dilemma. It is Jeconiah through whom the Solomonic descent and legal right to the throne properly should be traced. Solomon's throne had already been unconditionally promised eternal perpetuity. Yet Jeconiah will have no physical descendants who will prosper on that throne. How may both the divine promise and the curse be fulfilled? My partner makes a straw man fallacy. This is no dillemma at all! What we notice through the Kings of Israel (ref. here http://www.kchanson.com... Tovia Singer's lecture), we see that it normally goes through father-son-father-son etc. However, when we get to the cursed king, his BROTHER becomes king after him; not his son; hence there is no dilemma. No DESCENDANT will prosper; yet you can still be the brother of him and not be cursed. My partner claims the "virgin birth" answers all problems. However THIS poses a dilemma: If the virgin birth bypassed the curse; then it also bypassed the throne from Solomon! You cannot have your cake and eat it to."Regarding your Talmud citation. Really?...Seriously? You offer no reference to confirm. You offer no relevance to the discussion. Indeed it is totally irrelevant . Then to say "see…the Talmud does not mention Mary, Jesus, OR Heli!" this CANARD is a blatant "Red-Herring Fallacy.""You were the one that mentioned the Talmud; I showed that YOU took it out of context. Please reference the online talmud: http://www.sacred-texts.com..., you didn't even REFERENCE the Talmud, just quoted some "scholar" on the Talmud. Again, I'm conceding there are no contradictions between the genealogies; however contradictions are the least of my concerns.LET'S RECAP In Luke, Jesus is not a descendant of Solmon; hence he is not the Messiah. In Matthew, Jesus is cursed via Jechoniah; hence he is not the Messiah. The genealogies, though not contradictory, prove a Biblical errancy. Therefore, the Bible contains errrors. Why vote Pro? My partner inadaquetly addressed the genealogies of JC, taking the Talmud out of context. My partner drops the error concerning the failure of the Tyre prophecy