Atheism is for morons

1: Life could exist without many of the forces we have in the universe. Gravity is not needed for life, as microscopic organisms have been subject to zero-gravity experiments and found they continue as normal. Gravity is a thousand billion billion times weaker than EM force. It's simply irrelevant. A paper titled 'A Universe Without Weak Interactions' has shown that a universe without weak-force would be very similar to our own. Half of the forces in the universe are not needed for life, which should lead us to doubt the idea that the universe is fine-tuned for life. [1] http://www.youtube.com... [2] http://arxiv.org... 2: There's nothing about my world view that makes it hard to act consistently with it. Like everyone, I do things I later acknowledge to be wrong, but there's nothing inherent to my world view that makes it impossible to live by. 3: I don't believe that Jesus was lying. It's possible that he sincerely believed he was god, yet was misinformed. 4: This is an argument from popularity. The fact that many people call the Bible good is not a reason to take its claims seriously. 5: Our moral senses come from the natural, not the supernatural. Modern day science shows this to be true. It's also dubious to talk about a 'universal' moral sense. Was Gaddafi a part of our universal moral sense? 6: It's an arrangement of molecules, but it's capable of a wide range of experience in comparison to another arrangement of molecules, such as rocks. 7: The apostles did not die for a lie. There is no reason to believe in such a thing. [1] http://www.robertmprice.mindvendor.com... 8: I don't believe in UFO sightings or any of that, but I do believe in the extreme probability of life existing on other planets. One can believe in aliens while disagreeing with types of aliens. I believe, at a minimum, that life exists on other planets. It could be an advanced civilization, or bacteria. This does not stop me from withholding belief in some type of creator alien, as you suggest. 9: I cannot say with certainty that god does not exist. It is meaningless to deal with issues in a possible/impossible way. Rather, I believe we should look at them in terms of probable/improbable . 10: I'm not going to accept a person's faith to be true simply because they're smart in other fields. Pro's logic would have us believe that alchemy is true because Newton, a great scientist, believed it to be true. 11: In the same way it's arrogant to believe that the Salem Witch Trials were in error. 12: Irreducible complexity isn't true. 13: The laws of thermodynamics only apply to closed systems. 14: Yes, my present world view gives me meaning and purpose. 15: Perhaps that would be true. It's also irrelevant. 16: I ignore eyewitness accounts because eyewitness accounts do not prove something true. 17: Pro presents no reason to believe in the empty tomb. 18: You're not more likely to kill yourself as an atheist. Even if it was the case, it would not matter to the existence of god. 19: I don't know where the universe came from. 20: I believe we are made of star dust. 21: Matter cannot be created or destroyed. From this, Pro's question makes itself look ridiculous. If matter did come to exist, then asking me about what matter came from is a pointless and malformed question. Concluding Statement Pro provides arguments for the existence of god, as well as a bunch of red herrings and ultimately pointless observations. Sadly, even if we accept his arguments, it does not prove the resolution. He still has not proven, or tried to prove, that atheists are morons. Just that atheism is false. Ergo, the resolution has not been upheld.