Brian Eggleston's Breastguard™ electric bras would be a "stunning" success!

My opponent's arguments are absurd. He has obviously not met the burden of proof; he just kept on reiterating his position. Really, he has provided no evidence whatsoever! He has not proven that his Breastgaurds would be successes, nor has he even addressed many of my counterarguments. He has largely ignored my practical problems! These facts alone should win me this debate, but I shall proceed with my response anyway. "Girls and women don't like to feel threatened by males. They may wear low-cut blouses that reveal their cleavages in order to make themselves look attractive, but they don't expect men to leer at their breasts, slobbering over them like a dog eying up a plate of hot sausages, it makes them feel uncomfortable. " I thought your product supposedly stop groping, not stopped looking. Be honest, even if your product were to be a success, leering would not be stopped in this least bit. If anything, staring would increase! "Later, he may have taken her back to his place, where my opponent, having won the trust and affection of the gorgeous bit of fluff in question, would no doubt have seduced her and subsequently had the opportunity to make a close and thorough inspection of the lactose-dispensing goodies he wanted so much to get his hands on. " My opponent writes about how men often objectify women. How then, can he write the above? Women are not sex objects! Women are not pleasure inducers! Please treat them equally. I am appalled by my opponent's statements. (Also, my opponents statements are nothing but ridiculous. Even if my opponent had his product, that would not have stopped from me staring. ) "This will slate your thirst for eyefuls of cleavage and enable you to have normal conversations with cracking birds without continually peering down their blouses. " Once again irrelevant. Your product does not prevent leering, and so this is off topic. Also, stop objectifying women! "However, my revolutionary new electric bras have a huge advantage over all existing personal security devices as they are continually armed and deploy automatically. " No evidence? No proof? I shall refute this statement anyway. The problem with your product is this: Your product would only work if the offender attacked the women's breasts first. Pepper spray is much more effective for overall defense, and ensure much more security. RE: 2 Hypothetical Stories. These stories are completely imagined. I shall refute them anyway. If someone were really that aggressive, your proposed bra would do no good. Sure, it takes time to get out some pepper spray, but it also takes time to activate the electricity. Surely a motivated offender would take note of this, and would not be stopped by your product. "1 in 3 women have been sexually assaulted and there is a justifiable fear of becoming a victim in the reaming two thirds. " I'd like to remind my opponent that his (heavily biased) statistic refers to the world, not just western countries. Because these bras would be exclusively marketed to us Westerners (no one else has enough money for such a product), we can ignore everyone else. There is therefore no justifiable reason any Western women should be afraid of sexual assault. The statistic is much less for modernized countries. "As for those women concerned with accidentally electrocuting innocent members of the public in very crowded places, I forgot to mention there is an on/off switch! " Point conceded. You still have nothing.