The Biblical case for support of homosexuality.

It ultimately figures. You claiming to be a bi-sexual and yet you've never had sex in your entire life because no one can stomach to be anywhere near you. This will end very quickly in the first round. The bible specifically states. . . Here is a super prime reason why absolutely nobody should EVER believe in that maggoty god according to the bible. Listed below are sickening English translations of one and only one verse from the bible. It is Leviticus 20:13. Now notice how some of the verses listed below have absolutely NOTHING to do with each other? Notice how some of the verses go way way way out of their way to do their best and use the thesaurus and or come up with some other terminology? And what"s really nerve racking is some of the verses use the actual word "homosexuality". Oh please! The term homosexuality was NOT scribed into the bible until 1946! WHO CHANGES THESE VERSES OF GOD"S LAW WHEN THEY ARE VERY SPECIFIC? From the Dossier of Reason "The Problem of the Bible (How the bible is full of errors in nearly every way possible. ) I. Which Bible? A. Over 450 English versions of the bible B. All are translated using different methods and from entirely different manuscripts C. Thousands of manuscripts disagreeing with each other wildly in what verses and even books they contain, And how those verses read. D. Different translations teach entirely different things in places, Some often leaving out entire chapters and verses or containing footnotes warning of possible error due to uncertainty about the reliability of the numerous manuscripts. II. Availability - current estimate is that 2, 251 languages, Representing 193 million people, Lack a Bible translation So those verses and the bible"s that use them are either 100% truthful or the entire bible is trash. Well we all know that the entire bible is trash and the host of this debate, Who is only 15 btw completely friendless and loveless in which tells everything, Makes up things as he goes to suit his wants needs and desires, Just as the typical so-called christian does. Is it so hard for him to honestly take his god at his word? Why yes it is. Let's pass out some samples. . . KJV If a man also lie with mankind, As he lieth with a woman, Both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. AMP If a man lies [intimately] with a male as if he were a woman, Both men have committed a detestable (perverse, Unnatural) act; they shall most certainly be put to death; their blood is on them. AMPC If a man lies with a male as if he were a woman, Both men have committed an offense (something perverse, Unnatural, Abhorrent, And detestable); they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. "If a man lies with a male as if he were a woman, " Notice how this version is digging into the transgender issue? And then it goes way way way way overboard with its thesaurus digging ins of "offense (something perverse, Unnatural, Abhorrent, And detestable);" I mean how does this version know that its translation is EXACTLY right? CEB If a man has sexual intercourse with a man as he would with a woman, The two of them have done something detestable. They must be executed; their blood is on their own heads. "If a man has sexual intercourse with a man as he would with a woman, The two of them have done something detestable. " Completely and totally 100% different from "If a man also lie with mankind, As he lieth with a woman, Both of them have committed an abomination: " And then the CEB continues "They must be executed;" Here we go with the thesaurus issue "they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. " CEV It"s disgusting for men to have sex with one another, And those who do will be put to death, Just as they deserve. ERV "If a man has sexual relations with another man as with a woman, They have committed a terrible sin. They must be put to death. They are responsible for their own death. EXB If a man "has sexual relations [LR39;lies] with another man as a man does with a woman, These two men have "done a hateful sin [committed an abomination]. They must be put to death. They have brought "it [blood] on themselves [18:22]. A hateful sin? GW When a man has sexual intercourse with another man as with a woman, Both men are doing something disgusting and must be put to death. They deserve to die. Well well well well this has 0 to do with the KJV. "both men are doing something disgusting"? "They deserve to die? " Hmmm a Cannibal Corpse song? Oh that"s a good one. ICB ""A man might have physical relations with another man as a man does with a woman. If he does, These two men have done a hated sin. They must be put to death. They have brought it on themselves. ""A man might have physical relations" MIGHT? And notice how neatly "They have brought it on themselves. " is tacked on which has NOTHING to do with any other version? Hmmmm. TLB The penalty for homosexual acts is death to both parties. They have brought it upon themselves. Ah yes, NOTHING whatsoever to do with the KJV. Nothing. MSG "If a man has sex with a man as one does with a woman, Both of them have done what is abhorrent. They must be put to death; they are responsible for their own deaths. Using the thesaurus again? NASB If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, Both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them. detestable? Bloodguiltness? Why do bible"s go-out-of-their-way to be confusing and thus use terms from the thesaurus? Why not use the original terminology? NIRV Suppose a man has sex with another man as he would have sex with a woman. I hate what they have done. They must be put to death. Anything that happens to them will be their own fault. "I hate what they have done. " WHAT? What does that have that have ANYTHING to do with anything? "Anything that happens to them will be their own fault. " Kind of ad libbing there just a bit huh? NLV If a man lies with a male as if he were a woman, Both of them have done a very sinful act. They must be put to death. They will suffer for their own sin. "They will suffer"" more terminology. NLT "If a man practices homosexuality, Having sex with another man as with a woman, Both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, For they are guilty of a capital offense. "They are guilty of a capital offense. "? Wow. So raping a 6 year old girl has the same value or less than homosexuality in their book? Oh and oh yeah, They also didn"t use the term "homosexuality". Until 1946. WYC If a man sleepeth with a man, By lechery of a woman, Ever either hath wrought unleaveful thing, Die they by death; their blood be on them. (If a man sleepeth with a man, Like in fleshly coupling with a woman, They both have done an unlawful thing, And they both shall be put to death; their blood be on them. ) Se habla Espanol? This debate is now closed.