best method to prevent the racial and cultural extinction of the white ethnic groups

Before we begin, I'd like to acknowledge that there is no real threat to the white race so this debate is based entirely on hypotheticals. Character limits in this debate will be a huge burden, so in R1 I will dismantle Pro's arguments (rebuttal) and in R2 I will make my own arguments. So without further adieu... [ Rebuttal ] 1. Promoting Paganism Essentially paganism has been used as a term to refer to one who is religious or spiritual but not monotheistic. Also, "In the strictest sense, paganism refers to the authentic religions of ancient Greece and Rome as well as surrounding areas" [1]. Pro contends that Christianity is "too universalist" which in fact makes no sense. Both dictionary.com [2] and any Google search you do will explain how the term universalist is used to describe one who adheres to universalism; it is a principle that asserts that all people are under the consideration and Love of God [3]. So right away we notice 2 major flaws with Pro's argument. First, he says that Christianity is "too universalist" which really translates to... too accepting? Too open-minded? Too inclusive? Indeed that is what universalism means or encompasses. Second, Pro says that Christianity can be used as a tool to support liberal policies such as open borders and socialism. However, Christianity can also be used as a tool to support conservative policies like pro-life sentiments [4] and the death penalty [5]. Therefore this point is really moot anyway. Nevertheless, Pro writes that paganism is a "healthy" religion but does not explain why it is any healthier or superior to Christianity (or any other religion for that matter). He also says that it is not an alien belief that was forced unto people like Christianity is. I disagree. This "force" he speaks of probably refers to the Roman times when Constantine ordered everyone to turn from pagan to Christian. However, that type of force is not implemented today therefore this is irrelevant. Similarly, paganism is NOT rooted in the "natural essence of every ethnic group" which Pro has not supported, and furthermore, if anything it would be universalism (which Pro does not like) that embodies all of these various beliefs. After all, paganism refers to non-monotheism but universalism incorporates both monotheism, polytheism, all kinds of paganism, etc. So as you can see, Pro's points here are completely non-sensical and irrelevant. 2. Rejecting Feminism Almost every single thing Pro says about feminism is false. Feminism is not correlated to communism. Feminism is not about making women ashamed to be women, or trying to turn them into men. In fact, he straw mans feminism entirely and then provides a completely sexist argument that has nothing to do with feminism, thereby making his contention useless. The truth about feminism can be found here [6]. Pro also provides baseless statistics, such as a population being unable to sustain itself with low birth rates. In fact, the population has a worse chance at being able to sustain itself due to OVER-population [7]. 3. Final Notes Boo - character limits! I'll quickly re-cap why Pro's assertion that the rejection of Christianity and feminism will somehow preserve white people. First, Christians are PRO LIFE and ANTI CONTRACEPTION. That means if everyone deferred from Christianity, there would actually be MORE BIRTHS so Pro's point entirely fails. Second, many feminists want to have traditional families. Feminism does not correlate to negative attitudes about childbearing [8]. [1] http://www.allaboutspirituality.org... [2] http://dictionary.reference.com... [3] http://en.wikipedia.org... [4] http://www.nprcouncil.org... [5] http://web.telia.com... [6] http://en.wikipedia.org... [7] http://www.now.org... [8] http://open.salon.com...