Mark Sanchez (#5pick) will have a more productive 2009/2010 season then #1 pick Matthew Stafford

I want to apologize to voters for having to deal with semantics that are irrelevant to this debate. Semantics, semantics, semantics The statement was posed, "Mark Sanchez will have a more productive 2009/2010 season in the National Football League then the #1 overall pick Matthew Stafford. " The debate is formatted with my position being that Sanchez will have a better year than Stafford. Who ever takes the debate need to know that taking the position of con needs to prove that Stafford would have a more productive year then Sanchez. My opponent is trying to dazzle you with semantics, but lets bring facts into an equation that calls for it. My opponent does not have any facts surrounding his statement, "I have provided an instance when Stafford would be more productive than Sanchez". The position of "if" Sanchez gets hurt, is not a sufficient ground to stand on. This does not provide facts to his underlining know debate stance. (Stafford will have a more productive season then Sanchez) To claim that I should have stated a known debate understanding is nonsense. If this were true I should have stated an extremely large lists of "what if's" Example being… Mark Sanchez will have a more productive 2009/2010 season in the National Football League then the #1 overall pick Matthew Stafford if he does not get hit by a bus. Mark Sanchez will have a more productive 2009/2010 season in the National Football League then the #1 overall pick Matthew Stafford if his mother does not get injured and feels he should be by her side. Mark Sanchez will have a more productive 2009/2010 season in the National Football League then the #1 overall pick Matthew Stafford if the team is not involved in a plane accident to which Sanchez is ok… but his team is not. I could go on for a long time, but my opponent does not negate the fact that no football player plays to get hurt. None of these football players are hurt right now. And proves "(Players do not play to get hurt, so one must assume that they will play all 16 games)" So I hope I buried the semantics. (Knowing that he will harp on this semantic in mere hopes of smearing what this debate is really about, I suggest that the voters move to strike on this silly semantic) "Statistics in the preseason mean nothing to what happens in the regular season, which is the emphasis of this debate. " Preseason is the only thing we have to go by with these two players. "Preseason means nothing" is an uneducated stance. Jobs are determined between players in the preseason. To these guys and the true fans of the NFL preseason means everything. Sanchez had to compete to win the job. This statement just shows your lack of knowledge in football and how the game is played. "Cold streak" Is negated by stating and proving who has a stronger supporting cast. The jets will be able to give him more protection, and better shorter yard opportunities to shake of you "cold streak" allegation. "May hinder Sanchez from performing, but May not have any effect on Stafford. " Statements like "may hinder" and "may not have any effect" proves that you have no foundation in this debate and that you are pinning your hopes of winning on a "maybe". In conclusion I have given you numbers that prove my claim. This dance and pony show from my opponent needs to be stricken from the record, as he has not proven the true position of con. Voters, I have given you proof. I have the most credible sources. I have the more convincing arguments, as I have not put my hopes of a win on a "maybe". I have the better conduct based upon staying within the guidelines of debating, not getting heated when instigated, and not allowing myself to try to convince voters based on semantics, but by factual evidence. There is only one way to go here… vote pro… I have given you the numbers to support my claim in round 1. I ask that you refer to that, as I have had to straighten out a mess that someone is trying to start in this round Vote pro . http://blog.mlive.com... . http://www.nfl.com... . http://www.freep.com... . http://sports.espn.go.com... . http://www.pro-football-reference.com...