Heaven exists, not God; science of Quad Helix rotation.

Pro provides us with no reasons to believe in quad helix theory or any demonstration that it's important to us at all. I challenge anyone to read this debate and determine how, in any way, Pro proved that both "god does not exist" and "heaven exists" as the debate resolution states. "The Quad Helix is a fundamental nature that transcends the universe; all of the universe is in it's image, this is called image dei. "Pro provides no reason to accept this. "There are four primary images of Quad Helix, these are referred to as 'realms': the Quad Helix realm, the spatial realm, the planetary realm and the natural realm. "Pro provides no reason to accept this. "The four realms form a hierarchy, and each realm is a fraction and power of the realm above it in the hierarchy. "Pro provides no reason to accept this. "The Quad Helix has four attributes that are at opposite polarities: realm, centre, rotation and revolution. "Pro provides no reasons to accept this. "For example, the Sun in the centre of our solar system rotates, and this rotation causes the planets to rotate then revolve around the central Sun; this is the spatial realm. "First of all, there are no reasons to see the rotation of the Sun within the context of a "quad helix" theory. Contemporary scientific theories explain these events just fine. We have no need to use Pro's quad helix theory. Applying the terminology of quad helix theory to the rotation of the sun is an arbitrary and unnecessary move when we already have a terminology and theory that works, and when Pro provides no reasons for doing so. Also, it's not a spatial realm, it's a spatio-temporal realm, given space and time exist as a continium in Einstein's theory of relativity. "Sol is the central attribute of the spatial realm, it's rotation is it's process and the effect of that process is rotation of Orbis. Revolution is a process of Orbis, and the effect of that process is the revolution of Sol- what we call a "day". Why is the sun the central attribute of the spatial (spatio-temporal) realm? The sun, in the context of the entire spatial universe, is tiny and meaningless. Anyway, Pro is using a bunch of souped up pseudo-philosophical language just to tell us we need the sun to have day time, which neither proves god does not exist nor provides heaven is real at the same time. "There is rotation at opposite polarities- positive Sol and negative Orbis; there is revolution at opposite polarities- positive Orbis and negative Sol. "I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. "The day is more commonly known as Earth's rotation, but Earth's rotation is the effect of the Sun's rotation. To forget the rotation of the Sun is to abstract the perception of the Sun, and concentrate on the rotation of the Earth, which is what happens in human reality. "The Sun's rotation doesn't cause the Earth to rotate. The sun's gravity and rotation isn't even strong enough to significantly alter tidal patterns on planet Earth, nonetheless alter its entire rotation. In reality, the rotation of the planet Earth is due to early planetary formation, specifically, being hit by clumps of matter, not the rotation of the Sun. (. http://tinyurl.com...) "What is a day without the Sun revolving Earth in the sky? "The Sun doesn't revolve around the Earth. The Earth revolves around the sun. This is basic heliocentric theory. "To determine that the day is the planet rotating is to forget the perception of the day. It's a sophist ideology when the Sun is subtracted from the day, it's a belief that Earth is a singularity. "The perception of the day doesn't override the massive scientific evidence that the Earth revolves around the Sun and not the other way around. "The point is, there is equality between the two revolutions, the Sun that rotates and revolves around Earth, is as significant as, Earth that rotates and revolves around the Sun- they both contribute to the day. "No. Daylight happens because the Earth spins on its axis, so the part of Earth you're on is only facing the Sun during part of the day (unless you live in Alaska or something). The Sun's rotation has nothing to do with day and night. If the sun was solitary, and did not rotate whatsoever, we would still have day and night, because the Earth would still rotate, causing sunlight to hit some parts of the Earth and not others. It's pretty clear that the "science" of quad helix theory is actually based on outdated Heliocentrism and a misunderstanding of daylight and why the Earth rotates. Pro doesn't understand that the Earth revolves around the Sun, not the other way around. Pro doesn't understand that the Earth doesn't rotate because of the Sun. Because of this, Pro also doesn't understand that even if the Sun stopped rotating, we would still have night and day, because all that's required for night and day is for the Earth to rotate, causing different amounts of light to hit your part of the Earth at different times of the day. Pro doesn't understand that none of this has anything to do with the resolution. Pro has failed to provide any reasons to believe anything he says, and he is often completely wrong about what he says. The resolution is not upheld.