Capitalism is Superior to Communism

"The main reason why Communism fails is that it tries to make a classless society. That will never be possible."You might as well say I win.Rome"Rome never failed because of the economic structure. It failed because its military was not the strong legions back in the day. It had too many enemies and too much land to protect. It bought mercenaries to protect its lands." This point has been rebutted. Yes countries may get destroyed in the end by military forces and this was true with Rome, but they occured a century after the start of economic stagnation. The Roman military fell and the barbarians prevailed when the Romans couldn't keep a sound economic policy."It didn't have a modern communication system to get information acrossed its vast landscspe. It didn't have trains or cars to move troops acrossed its land either. Just feet and horses." This is a very weak argument. Yeah, Rome did not have cars and modern communications, but neither did everyone else during its period. Also, if no modern technology caused Rome to fail then why did it succeed to a huge empire in the first place? Nazi GermanyThe German economy was a statist economy similar to that of the USSR. We saw that the USSR inevitably declined and this was the case with Nazi Germany. Wars only made the decline faster, but it was inevitably going to because of poor economic policy that only breifly brought wealth to Germany.United Kingdom"The date about the U.K. financial bankrupcy tells all: 1945 into the late 70s. Wars aren't cheap man. Germany is still paying off debt of World War 1. Even the victors of World War 1 had faced depressions and lost a lot of their male populations."German war debt has already been paid off. [1] You are looking at WW1, but it is silly to think such a war caused great financial implications into the 1970s for Britain. Britain still remained a top empire after that. Wars aren't cheap is a major cop-out. WW1 has little to do with the Great Depression, but even less to do with British economic policy after even WW2. You forgot about the baby boomers completely which led to large workforce in the British socialist economy but the nationalized industries failed and Thatcher prevailed."Economic and Political growth is fine. But even though the Indians never grew stronger, they still never ripped continents of their resources and left dumps so large they can be seen in space. And made thousands of species either endangered or extinct. Or made Global Warming a problem at large."The whole point of an economic system is to create wealth and growth and communism has not been proven to do that. Also many capitalists countries are thriving without empires. Climate change is not man-made. [2]You then talk about the economic structures of bees and termites, however we are talking clearly about an economic system for humans. Also the economy in Russia has little to do with Putin's decision to invade Ukraine. If anything they invaded it for better economic benefits to rescue themselves. Yes North Korea is communist and failed.Overall, these are some easy arguments to beat.Sources1. http://news.smh.com.au...2. Watts, Anthony. "A Study: The Temperature Rise Has Caused the CO2 Increase, Not the Other Way Around."Wattsupwiththat.com. Watts Up With That?, 9 June 2010. Web.