Male Circumcision is ethically no different from Female Genital Mutilation

You had better not be a troll, let's get this nightmare over with:My burden of proof is that:1. The reasons for Male Circumcision, generally, are no different than those for Female Circumcision2. That the Effects are for the most part similar respectively. 3. That the justifications provided for either are interchangeable, and the practicioners of both use the same justifications as the other in general.As such, I will now proceed to prove each of these burdens. I. THAT THE REASONS FOR MALE CIRCUMCISION, GENERALLY, ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN THOSE FOR FEMALE CIRCUMCISION:As the title states, we will be analysing the reasons provided for Male Circumcision, and compare them to those for Female Circumcision i the effort of proving that they are virtually the same. For this purpopse, I will be using the first website that came up when I googled 'reasons for circumcision.' {1}RELIGIOUS REASONSMy source states:"Circumcision is a religious or cultural ritual for many Jewish and Islamic families, as well as certain aboriginal tribes in Africa and Australia."Likewise, Female Genital Mutuilation is donefor religious or cultural reasons as well:" FGM is seen as part of a girl’s initiation into womanhood and as an intrinsic part of a community’s cultural heritage. - See more at: http://www.unfpa.org... FGM is seen as part of a girl’s initiation into womanhood and as an intrinsic part of a community’s cultural heritage. - See more at: http://www.unfpa.org... FGM is seen as part of a girl’s initiation into womanhood and as an intrinsic part of a community’s cultural heritage. - See more at: http://www.unfpa.org... FGM is seen as part of a girl’s initiation into womanhood and as an intrinsic part of a community’s cultural heritage... Although FGM is not endorsed by either Islam or by Christianity, supposed religious doctrine is often used to justify the practice." {2} HYGEINIC REASONS:My source states:"Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis."Likewise, Female Genital Mutilation is done for hygeinic reasons as well:" In some communities, the external female genitalia are considered dirty and ugly and are removed, ostensibly to promote hygiene and aesthetic appeal. - See more at: http://www.unfpa.org... In some communities, the external female genitalia are considered dirty and ugly and are removed, ostensibly to promote hygiene and aesthetic appeal."HEALTH BENEFITS:My source states:"Decreased risk of urinary tract infections... Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections... Prevention of penile problems... Decreased risk of penile cancer."Of course, all of these are bullsh*t, but that is not what this debate is about- the Muslims claim that there are health benefiots to Female Genital Mutilation as well. {3} Thus meaning that I have fulfilled my first burden of proof.II. THAT THE EFFECTS ARE FOR THE MOST PAT SIMILAR RESPECTIVELY:The US National Librarty of Medicine, of the National Institutes of Health states:"The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis." {4} The effectualm equivolent of Male Circumcision would be the removal of the clitoris, the most sensitiove part of the female genitalia. Furthermore, the British Journal of Urology states:"Circumcision also ablates junctional mucosa that appears to be an important component of the overall sensory mechanism of the human penis." {5}In conclusion, it is an undeniable fact that circumcision destroys highly errogenous tissue as well as the majority of a males sexual pleasure. A common response to this is that FGM destroyts all of a females ability to feel pleasur, whereas circumcised men can still feel pleasure- but this is simply innacurate. Female Gernital Mutilation, though siginifiucantly damagiong to female sexual pleasure, very rarely does it completely destroy it. {6}III. THAT THE JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED FOR EITHER ARE INTERCHANGEABLE, AND THE PRACTITIONERS OF BOTH USE THE SAME JUSTIFICATIONS AS THE OTHER IN GENERAL:This BOP[ deals with the excuses and justifications for MGM and FGM, as opposed to the reasons why they are done. As such, it will respond to the excuses people provide for Male Genital Mutilation, and compare them to those of Female Genital Mutilation. #1. "The AAP said that the benefits outweigh the risks."Justlike with Female Genital Mutilation- the same excuse is provided:"Most people who practice FGC recognize its costs—they just think the benefits outweigh them." {7}#2. "The decision should be up to the parents."The same excuse is provided by peoiple who mutilate their daughters genitals.#3. "It's an Islamic tradition, so there's nothing wrong with it."This specific one was provided by that Muslim b*tch who was recently arrested for mutilating young girls- likewise Male Geniotal Mutilation is a Jewish and Islamic ritual too- and Jews and Muslims use this excuse all the time. CONCLUSION:People claim that FGM is 'totally different' from MGM, but to be honest- I fail to see any fundamental moral difference between cutting a girls vagina against her will and cutting a boys penis against his will, and thus fr I have more than fulfilled my BOP as to why the two are exactly the same. {1}. http://www.mayoclinic.org...{2}. http://www.mayoclinic.org...{3}. https://islamqa.info...{4}. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...{5}. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com...{6}. https://www.womenonwaves.org...{7}. https://www.theatlantic.com...{8}.