BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
Ethan will get laid before Rohan.

I would like to point out that both Ethan AND Rohan are awesome debaters and either way, if girls wanted to have Rohan's debating powers "passed onto them vaginally" then why hasn't Rohan gotten any action yet? Also, if you don't measure an individual's ability to get girls at least to SOME degree by how girls react to an individual already, what else do you meausre it by? While you state that Rohan could get it on, ethan's the one actually LIVING IT. Girls always hug and chase after Ethan. As quoted from the colleage, D. P. , of the local statistician and researcher, T. N. , "Ethan, will you marry me? " How many other girls are that hungry for a piece of Rohan? The answer, my friends, is ZERO. My opponent states that "Rohan's most recent party had a better boys to girls ratio, of about 4 to 1. " However, these statistcs are skewed in that only five people were invited to begin with. Also, during Ethan's end of the year party of 07, the ratio of boys to girls was about even. Secondly, the opinion of the English teacher whom my opponent cited in his previous speech can be ignored since said English teacher is about twice the age of both Ethan and Rohan, and thus would have to be a pedifile in order to find Ethan's strangeness cute. Though it must be admitted that SOME girls might not be able to appreciate the unique and enigmatic aura that comes with a guy who eats pencils and paper, a majority of girls have been shown to like Ethan for his adorable curious habits and oddities. Ethan's strange actions produce a sense of curiousity amongst members of the female gender, giving him an enigmatic presense and dreamy mysteriousness that just increases his sexing potential and boosting his bang-able percentage from 98.6% to 130%, as estimated from . http://bpg.stastistics.com.... My opponent argues that Rohan is on a sports team and thus has more of a chance of getting some ntss ntss time. However, i would like to inform my opponent that Ethan is a black belt in Tae Kwon Do and can kick Rohan's badminton-team butt. Though you cite a quote that argues that 2 out of the 3 girls in LR4N6 are asian, the "noted evolutionary sociologist" can't possibly hope to compete against Jesus, who also said that evolution is stupid and that Evolutionary Sociologists with the initials J. H. are helpers of Satan, similar to Santa's helpers with the only difference being that rahter than aiding in the process of giving gifts to little children and living in the North Pole, helpers of satan refuse to acknowledge their incorrect beliefs about Rohan vs. Ethan, as well as steal the souls of countless individuals. .. and eat baby cats.
Ethan will get laid before Rohan.

Although it is obvious that Ethan has girls come to him, that does not mean that he has any more sexual prowess than Rohan. Also, Rohan is a better debater, which makes other debate girls attracted to him, because they want some of the debate skill goodness to be passed unto them vaginally. Also, it should be noted that in the most recent party that was held by ethan, only one girl attended, setting the ratio of boys to girls at about 8 to 1. This one girl even left early. Rohan's most recent party had a better boys to girls ratio, of about 4 to 1. This exhibits Rohan's increased ability to get some. Ethan's twitching is most definetly off putting, as quoted by an English teacher who has a college degree that, 'it is weird.' Girls don't like things that are really weird, especially when it involves things like eating paper, or pencils. Weird. Rohan is on a sports team, and not just any sports team, but a co-ed sports team. This gives him many opprotunities to woo not only the girl in the stands flashing him, but also the girl on the bench, giving his "back" a "massage" after a "hard" match. Rohan has much greater potential. I have a quote from noted evolutionary sociologist J.H. that "2 out of 3 girls in LR4N6 are asian, therefore predispositioned to do things that don't make sense, such as go for a twitching retarded kid." Gerard also got to third base with one out of three of the girls, so I win.
Ethan will get laid before Rohan.

My opponent states that "Although ethan may be cute as a button, Rohan will be the one who will get some, because he doesn't act like an idiot. " However, if that were true, why is it that more girls can be seen crowding around Ethan and committing sexually inappropriate acts to Ethan while Rohan sits in a little corner singing the "pickle ball" song? My opponent also aruges that Rohan has the "ability to charm people" while Ethan lacks the ability "to make basic conversation. " However, Ethan is actually rather social in that he regularly has a few parties every now and then and many people go to it and have a groovy time. Though it is true that Ethan does indeed twitch alot, that is exactly what makes him so unique and adorable whereas guys like Rohan are so common they're on sale, 50% off. Buy one get one free. if you know what i mean. Rohan, doesn't twitch. Also, race has nothing to do wif the matter. Simply because Ethan is white does not mean he can't have as much fun during sexual love-making time as Rohan. As a matter of fact, more people wish to commit happy fun-time wif Ethan since he's so silly and cute and overall groovy. A recent survey taken by local statistician and researcher, Professor T. N. , states that "2 out of 3 girls in LR4N6 finds Ethan to be ridiculously adorable. " Also, I happen to be a vegetarian and i can safely say that being a vegetarian is a limited factor in the getting-laid process. Not many people will run up searching for vegetarians to bang, whereas everyone practically throws themself at Ethan. Furthermore, Ethan has already been shown to get more girls than Rohan, which my opponent fails to argue against. Though in THEORY, perhaps Rohan might possibly somehow have a change, it doesn't matter because we're debating about the real world, not the imaginary world. And in the REAL world, Ethan's the one having girls run out of nowhere and sit on his lap while Rohan's having fun wif Gerard, whom no one cares about. Obviously, Ethan can, and will, get laid before Rohan can. Jesus himself told me so. It says so here, right in the Bible, the book of Ethan, psalm 38792374: "And so the Lord (and Jesus) said unto Ethan, 'Thou shalt recieve unto thine being the joyous love-making of many women before that of Rohan. '"
Ethan will get laid before Rohan.

My argument rests on the fact that Rohan is considerably less awkward than Ethan. Although ethan may be cute as a button, Rohan will be the one who will get some, because he doesn't act like an idiot. There is simply no denying that Rohan has more potential to pick up chicas than ethan does, because of Rohan's ability to charm people, and Ethan's inability to make basic conversation. Ethan twitches a lot too, and although I guess that could add to the cuteness factor, its actually really weird, and would definitely impede in his ability to get it on. Rohan, doesn't twitch. Also, Rohan is tall, and slender, and Indian. Ethan is small, and white. Rohan is a vegetarian as well, which many chicks dig. Ethan on the other hand loves eating him some meat. 3 reasons, ethan's got no game, Rohan is more physically attractive, and Rohan is a vegetarian. Ethan will not be the first to get laid, between him and Rohan.
Ethan will get laid before Rohan.

Just so people know, this is debate that's just for fun. anyway, let's get started: I stand in concurrence wif the statement that "Ethan will get laid before Rohan" Before i continue, i would like to offer the following definitions: Ethan: the twitchy, McCain-loving, skinny little kid in the LR4N6 team whose description will remain vague in order to protect him from sexual predators (who would be inclined to rape him since he's just too sexy for his pants.) Rohan: the tall, Republican-wanna be in the LR4N6 team whose description will also remain vague for his own safety...and becasue he doesn't know we're debating this right now. ahaha. get laid: the act of having sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite gender. Contentions: 1. Ethan is currently loved and adored by most people, especially those of the female species....er, gender. He has many friends and few serious enemies. also, many girls love Ethan. As observed today, two asian girls fought over Ethan's attention and love during debate club even though Ethan did nothing to provoke them and was simply trying to do work. This only proves that Ethan is just too sexy for his pants. 2. In comparison, Rohan is unloved by girls. Though it must be admitted that Rohan has many friends, he lacks the skill to obtain any female admirers. If you look around during an average day, ethan gets more action than Rohan ever will hope to get.
Dispensational eschatology is an incorrect hermeneutic

I will follow my opponents suggestion for order in each of the rounds, but would like to ask a few questions. 1) for round 2, it seems I have an unfair advantage as you will have nothing to rebuttal from me as I would not have presented an argument yet, only a summery, are you fine with only having the standard arguments from search-able sources of proponents of Dispensationalism, or do you need me to post anything extra from my summery in the comment section for you to give rebuttal towards? 2) similar question about round 3, should I put the 3 questions max in round 2 so that you can answer them in the question and answer round? Definitions as far as I can see are covered, but considering the debate, there is a chance Covenant theology will come up presented as an alternative so here is source for that [1]. Eschatology is of course study of 'end things'. As for my summery. .. . I will primarily argue. .. . 1) Dispensationalist does interpret the bible consistently 2) Generally speaking, rejecting Dispensationalism causes at least some of the most reasonable apologetic's for Christianity to fall apart 3) should it come up, I will provide a case to show Covenant theology inaccurate, if not in all respects at least in some. 4) perhaps I am misunderstanding what my opponents case shall be when he say's he will show Dispensationalism as 'unorthodox', but currently I understand orthodox to mean the normal teaching of the church; and if Pro hopes to show Dispensationalism is wrong because its not the 'normal' teaching of most christian churches, then I will have quite a lot to say about that. However to me that just seems too illogical a case to make that I doubt I understand yet what the significant point Pro plans to make about it being 'not orthodox' so I will just have to wait and see. .. .. I never thought of myself s a Dispensation Christian before, however after reading the wiki source you gave I realized I have been arguing it as part of my apologetic arguments in the forums for quite some time on this sight. Also the source on Covenant theology say's it's accepted by mostly Calvinist churches, and seeing as I'm a 'Free Willie' anti-Calvinist, and Methodist, I figure that most likely makes me a Dispensationalist Christian too. I hope I will show myself to debate in honorably Scout like, and Christ like way, but if I slip up from doing so guess it's cause I'm human but feel free to call me out on it so that I know to correct my behavior. [1] . http://en.wikipedia.org...
Dispensational eschatology is an incorrect hermeneutic

This is a theological, not idealogical debate. Therefore, I would prefer to debate with a fellow Christian who believes the Bible is the ultimate authority on the matter. Definition: Dispensationalism is a Protestant evangelical tradition based on a biblical hermeneutic that sees a series of chronologically successive "dispensations" or periods in history in which God relates to human beings in different ways under different Biblical covenants. [1] I will primarily argue the following points: 1. Dispensationalism interprets the Bible inconsistently 2. Dispensationalism leads to inconsistency 3. Dispensationalism makes unfounded claims 4. Dispensationalism is not orthodox I would suggest the following order for the rounds of debate: 1. Definitions and summary of what will be presented 2. Arguments and rebuttals 3. Questions and answer period ~ 3 questions max 4. Final rebuttals and closing arguments If you are a Dispensational Christian, and would like to debate the issue in a civil and Christ honoring way, then accept this debate... 1. http://en.wikipedia.org...
PC is better than game consoles

"1. Consoles have exclusives that easily blow PC exclusives out of the water, honestly no one really puts exclusives on PC's, since theyre not the most popular choice of gaming platform, so a profit would be smaller, which is why they are usually released AFTER the games initial release on a console (Like GTAV Online)" minor "2. Console online gaming is more stable, PC gaming isn't stable online, servers are unprotected, theres no real control over others, and hackers plaque PC games much easier." True, but there are also problems with Console games. Newer PC games have few hacking problems. "3. Its cheaper, technically, ignoring pirating, console gaming is cheap in the far run, due to a cheaper based console. Unlike a pc, where a decent rig will drop for a thousand, and then require you to drop another thousand on a gen hop." false "4. Consoles have always been more successful than PC's. Always." false 5. Console gaming has a bigger culture impact, and revolutioal, unlike PC. NES, Genesis, 360, Wii, GB, PS, PS2, you name it, they all have a household name, and they all revolutionized the world. The PC on the other hand, simply piggy backs its success, with console ports. false "I would make more arguments, and longer ones if SOMEONE *cough*STALIN*Cough* didnt limit this to 2000 characters." You did not use all of your 2,000 characters." You still had over 700 left. Conduct for Con goes down due to lying. http://www.techradar.com... More reasons that PC is better than Consol. 1. Mouse and keyboard support 2. High screen resolutions 3. Free mods 4. Upgradeable hardware 5. Cheaper games 6. You're not tied to one online service 7. No extra dosh needed for playing online 8. Unlimited storage space 9. Save game hacking 10. Unofficial fixes for older games 11. Abandonware 12. No red ring of death
PC is better than game consoles

I shall reserve counter points for round three than 1. Consoles have exclusives that easily blow PC exclusives out of the water, honestly no one really puts exclusives on PC's, since theyre not the most popular choice of gaming platform, so a profit would be smaller, which is why they are usually released AFTER the games initial release on a console (Like GTAV Online) 2. Console online gaming is more stable, PC gaming isn't stable online, servers are unprotected, theres no real control over others, and hackers plaque PC games much easier. 3. Its cheaper, technically, ignoring pirating, console gaming is cheap in the far run, due to a cheaper based console. Unlike a pc, where a decent rig will drop for a thousand, and then require you to drop another thousand on a gen hop. 4. Consoles have always been more successful than PC's. Always. 5. Console gaming has a bigger culture impact, and revolutioal, unlike PC. NES, Genesis, 360, Wii, GB, PS, PS2, you name it, they all have a household name, and they all revolutionized the world. The PC on the other hand, simply piggy backs its success, with console ports. I would make more arguments, and longer ones if SOMEONE *cough*STALIN*Cough* didnt limit this to 2000 characters.
PC is better than game consoles

PC is OPS!!!!! ARGUMENT 1: You can play all game that are on XBOX or PS on the PC as well. So what's the point of getting a $200 XBOX and a super expensive TV as well as the games when you can just do everything on a Computer. My point is that the cost of playing on the PC supports my argument about PC games being better. ARGUMENT 2: You cannot play strategy games such as Napoleon Total War, Starcraft, and Hearts of Iron 3 on XBOX and PS. On the PC, you it is possible to play any game in the world. ARGUMENT 3: On a game console you can only have 1 game open at a time. On the PC, you can have multiple games/windows open at the same time. You can just minimize one window and open another. ARGUMENT 4: It is easier to play on PC than on a console. It would be easier to play first person shooter games for example on a PC than a console. *Please do not rebut my arguments, only state your arguments in round 2 to make this debate even.
Skrillex does not deserve a Grammy or even a Nomination

Most of Skrillex’s bass drops don’t include sampled yelling, they’re usually just instrumental. And while his bass drops are typically pretty aggressive and noisy, they are in the context of structured melodic songs with a consistent rhythm. Noisy elements happen in all different music genres all the time, take Jimi Hendrix’s guitar style for examples, he would incorporate noisy/distorted sounds into his guitar solo’s. Simply having noisy aspects to a song doesn’t make the entire song noise.Like I mentioned in my previous argument, Skrillex does more than just sit at a computer and play with beats. He’s using synths and samples to create music. Finding the right samples and then editing them is a process that takes talent/creativity to be good at. He often times edits the samples in such a way that he creates new melodies out of them. He also goes into a lot of different and complex directions rhythmically, and that can take a lot of tedious editing to get right. Producing an entire album yourself is a pretty big feat too, there’s a reason why most artists hire someone else to produce their music for them. It can be a very involved process that can take a long time to complete. So, for these reasons I believe that Skrillex does make actual music, and not simply just noise. I also believe that the way he chooses to make music is just as legitimate as someone writing a song on the guitar. I don’t think it’s fair to compare one method of writing music to another like that anyway (in the sense that one is better than the other). Many great rock songs have consisted of just 3 simple power chords, and that doesn’t have to take much talent to achieve. Certainly there have been many electronic/dubstep songs that have taken a much longer time and a lot more work to write than some of those classic rock songs. But at the end of the day i don't think it makes a difference, good music is good music regardless of how it’s made.
Skrillex does not deserve a Grammy or even a Nomination

You make a few good points but I still can't find it music. Some of his beats are pretty good but those bass drops ruin it, they sound like someone yelling "Oh S***!" slamming on the brakes about to hit someone with there car hahaha. I just hate when rappers or NOW dubstep use samples from music, write your own things!!!! I think people with talent deserve the Grammy over a guy that just sits on a computer and plays with beats. He has added a new genre to America but I just don't consider it music at all. So my closer is that I don't count it music really, not talent just a guy playing on a computer, and Band Perry or Bon Iver have more talent and deserve it much more that him.
Skrillex does not deserve a Grammy or even a Nomination

I should start off by clarifying that Skrillex is a producer, he produces all his own stuff. Typically, in Electronic music, the producer is the person writing all of the music while creating a lot of it on electronic instruments and/or computer music software.While, personally, I’m not the biggest fan of Skrillex (or the Grammys for that matter), I would argue that what he makes is most definitely music. His EP, Scary Monsters and Nice Sprites, is his work that has been nominated for the Grammy. He displays a pretty solid and interesting sense of rhythm through-out the entire record. And while there are pretty noisy and aggressive elements to his music (usually during the bass drops), he also displays a pretty strong sense of melody through-out the entire record as well. One track even completely diverging from his dubstep sound to a more dance-pop one. So, I would say his music is far from being just “noise” as you’re arguing.And, indeed, what he does takes talent. While, you’re right, I don’t believe he sings on the album, it seems he does rely on samples and guest vocalists/rappers to provide that element to his recordings. I don’t think that discredits him as a musical artist in any way. His job is as the producer. He provides the beats, samples, synths, etc. to create the music. And that’s not necessarily an easy task. It does take time to find the rights samples to fit the tempo and key of the song. He’s creative and diverse in his use of samples, going from pop singers to people yelling. He edits them well and in an interesting way, layering them on top of each other, playing them backwards and then forwards, chopping them up to the rhythm, etc. His placements of these samples are not random, they are thought out and fit well with the rhythm and melodies of the song. He’s also been a huge success world wide, and introduced a new American audience to Dubstep/Electronic music. Considering all of this, I can understand why he got nominated for a Grammy.
Skrillex does not deserve a Grammy or even a Nomination

I start off my saying that Skrillex is not music, not even dubstep. It's just noises thrown into a beat that don't even sound good, just hurt your brain. He is up for a Grammy, WHY? It's not music it's just noise. Most of the songs he does are just dumb and noises over covered songs. The others he's up against have way more talent than him. Singing, he doesn't even sing he probably just sitting in a room on a laptop playing with noises and some record producer found it money worthy! So I don't think he deserves a Grammy at ALL because it's just noise, not even music and there is no talent behind it at all! Out of the people he is up against, The Band Perry and Bon Iver have the most talent with singing and using actual instruments.