The Harry Potter book series is better than the Twilight book series.

Due to Pro's broken link, readers will have to visit the following link to view Pro's case. If for some reason it is not working, then visit the comments section.Pro's Case.https://docs.google.com...Pro's Case1) Old arguments conceded, new arguments intoduced Lets look at my my diagram again. Making and impact vs. Making a story realistic. Pro has conceded the right side. He has changed his arguments from, “Harry Potter is more realistic” to “Harry Potters being realistic makes more of an impact”. So in the end, we both are arguing over which story makes more of an emotional impact. Pro argues this is done by death- since death is realistic, then readers will sympathize with Harry Potter. I argue this is done with love- that love is more powerful than death. We all experience it, hate it, crave it, and sometimes just don't understand it. But we as humans dwell on love much more than we do death. We spend our waking ours thinking about our wife, our girlfriend, or just that girl down the street. It is only on the rare occasions when those close to us die that we begin to realize our own mortality. So I shall make a new diagram for our readers to ponder on- Death vs. Love I ask each reader to think about which side is more emotionally grabbing to them. Which one makes more of an impact on you? A) Bella throws herself off of cliffs because she has been ripped apart from her soulmate. She has gone crazy from losing the thing that she loves most and is on the verge of killing herself. Many mature people have fallen under the same depression after losing their mate making what she does completely normal given the circumstances. B) Pro seems to want to play semantics with me. I wrote most because there obviously will be people who are not a teen and will love HP. But the fact remains the same- it is written for children and teens. Barnes & Noble has the age range at 9 - 12 Years under product details.(1) There you go, theres your proof that HP is written for teens. http://www.barnesandnoble.com...(1)Going back it point 1, HP and Twilight will mostly appeal to teenagers. Teenagers appeal to love much more than they do to death, theraby destryoing Pro's realistic argument. 2) I think JK is a better Author. Why? Idk A) Pro has finally submitted to quality over quantity. Unfortunately, the moment he did so I had won this argument. There is absolutely no creature in HP that gets more spotlight than Edward with nearly half the series to himself. Edward goes through deep internal doubt about what he should do about Bella. This doubt makes him evolve as a character and produces changes in his character. If Pro thinks that Stephinie spent half the series describing Edward as a boring rock, then he is entitled to his opinions. I on the other hand think that he is a deep character that is not just “granite rock”. B) I really don't feel like arguing that Twilight is its own world when it so obviously not. The whole Edward and Bella, the Volturi, the werewolves, all this isn't a fantasy world? What constitues as fantasy to Pro I wonder? And then Pro goes on to repeat his research resolution which I have already rebuttaled. JK spent her time researching latin phrases while Stephanie spent her time researching info about Forks and its people. They both did their research, so how is ones researching or imagination superior? 3) Irrelevant points did not suddenly become relevant A) Pro insist because JK has made more books based off of HP, HP is better. How does other books add or take away from the main series? The fact that JK has written any books about HP is irrelevant to the the actual series. And I would like to say that I found The Second life of Bree Tanner quite an interesting and entertaing read. But my opinions about the books matters little, and so it should be with Pro's opinions. 4) What truth? A) “Bella DOES NOT love her town, the people, and land around her.” My god, have you not read twilight? She loves Edward, Jacob, The Cullins, the woods, the meadows, the Quielite tribe, her classes, pretty much everything about Forks now. All these things, she did not love before meeting Edward. The story tells how she wanted to move back to Phoenix so bad because she despised these things. Pro even acknowledges she changes when he claims any changes in the beginning doesn't count. But does it matter when she changes? The fact that she changes at all makes her dynamic. I would also like to add to this argument by saying that she also changes at the end when she becomes a vampire. Pro has been ingenuine about Bella’s character from the beginning, something that has done little for his arguments. 4.b I never dropped, you just never gave me more than your personal opinions as to why third person is better. Your main rebuttals was quote on quote “Getting inside the head of Bella Swan is not something most readers even want to do” and “she is a one dimensional character.” All points I have already rebuttaled or that is just an unbacked up opinion. 5) Pro changes his view on how HP is unpredictable. Pro now claims that it is the unpredictability within the story that counts. I have some questions to ask then- Did the readers predict that Edward would leave Bella for an entire book?Did the readers predict Bella would fall in love with Jacob? Did the readers predict that the Voulturi would want to kill the Cullens? Did the readers predict Jacob would imprint on Renesmee or that Bella would have even gotten pregnant? Case in point. If this is what Pro actually wants to argue, then he never had a leg to stand on. My Case 1) When did I suddenly become the hater? I am not insulting anything, I have simply stated an opinion, tried to make it seem humorous, and then backed it by observations I have made. Secondly, my point was that Twilight has much more variations in its fighting. 56 ways of fighting> than shooting balls of light every time. *Brief note about my conduct. Pro has tried to appeal to the conduct vote by saying I have resorted to insulting HP. I) Lets not resort to semantics please. . As long as I give reasons for calling something a retard(which by the way I never did), I am within my rights. II) I forgave Pro for forfeiting round two. III) I allowed Pro to go over the character limit without making an issue. This makes my job of refuting much harder, but never once did I complain. IV) I did not make an issue out of Pro's sloppy writing in round 1 nor did I make an issue about his broken link. I have tried to uphold good conduct in this debate and hope the readers don't listen to Pro's nonsense about me being otherwise. 2) Edward is a pervert? A) I can confidently tell you Edward wasn't checking out Bella's reproduction system. That just makes no sense. Just because Pro is a horny teenager doesn't mean the rest of us are thinking about sex 24/7. B) Never once has Jacob french kissed Renessemee. It is and will be for awhile, brotherly love. C)Twilight has received several awards including Publishers Weekly's "Best Children's Books of 2005"(2) School Library Journal's "Best Books of 2005"(2) The reviews were initially mainly positive.(2) http://en.wikipedia.org...(novel)(2) Clearly Twilight is not as badly written as Pro would like us to think. Conclusion Pro seemed more interested in appealing to those who had already liked HP better. Many of his arguments- such as the argument of realisticness- end up being turned against him. Arguments such as “Twilight is written better” were backed up by absolutely nothing but Pro's own opinion.I hope the readers have come to the same conclusion I have, that Twilight deserves as much recognition as HP- if not more so given Pro's arguments. I thank Pro for an interesting- if not long- and fun debate. I hope the Pro and the readers enjoyed this debate as much as I did.