I claim the existence of God

Pro States "Only something that was above these laws could break them (The laws of conservation of mass and energy). I, by no means, say that The laws of conservation of mass and energy have ever been broken. The singularity contained all the mass and energy in the Universe. No God is required to break these laws, because these laws were never broken. Pro States, "The singularity is in essence God" One of the first rules of the debate was no semantics and no BS definitions. The definition of God is not singularity and the definition of singularity is not God. They are not the same things. Pro claims the singularity "Is the supreme originator from which the universe was created" An originator is not a creator. Ice cubes originate from water. Water is not a creator of ice cubes. Pro claims "Either the singularity is God, or the singularity is the product of God, which shows intelligent design. " There is no evidence that proves the singularity was a product of God. Science can't answer where the singularity came from, but that doesn't mean a God made it. That's a logical fallacy called an "Argument from Ignorance" It basically says, if science can't answer where it came from, a God did it. Pro says, "Energy had to arise from somewhere, and that originator is God" Once again, an argument from ignorance. Pro claims "The universe does have an omniscient creator behind it, because otherwise the universe would be a statistical improbability. " The probability that this Universe is the way it is, is 100%. There are no other Universes to compare it to. The fact that this only universe exists exactly the way it does, proves that this is the only way a Universe can exist at all. The probability that a universe can be different is 0%. That does not prove it was created. The probability that an ice cube can form at 32 degrees Fahrenheit is 100%. That doesn't mean God makes ice cubes. There's nothing intelligent about the design of an ice cube. It happens on its own, just like the Universe itself happened on its own. Pro gives me more arguments from ignorance: "Therefore this trend would prove that the universe is moving from complexity to simplicity. That original complexity was God. " You can not keep claiming "God did it" Every time you don't have the answer to something. Is it POSSIBLE that there is a God that did all this? Sure! But that's not proof that God really does exist. Just because something is possible, doesn't make it true. The burden of proof is on pro to actually provide evidence that God is real, not just claim God is real, because God is possible. Pro ignored my claim that God would not be necessary as a creator if the Universe can form on it's own. Pro claims that has something to do with knowing the will of God. If there is no God, there is no will of God. If the Universe can come about on it's own, then God, or his will, is not necessary. To quote Professor Stephen Hawking, "It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going. " Pro has tried many times to use the logical fallacy of the argument from ignorance to prove God exists. No matter how complex the Universe is, no matter how likely the probability of the Universe forming the way it did and no matter how science can not answer the question of where the singularity came from, it does not prove the existence of God, defined as "A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions. "