The Islamic Concept of God is Inadequate

Thanks to Dimmitri for his post.1. My opponent's case: My opponent presented a syllogism...1. Allah is God.2. Allah is, therefore, the Greatest Conceivable Being.3. If it could be shown that Allah is not the Greatest Conceivable Being, then, Allah would not be Greatest Conceivable Being and, therefore, God.4. Allah is not morally perfect as He does not love the evil-doers. (logical contradiction)5. Therefore, Allah isn’t the Greatest Conceivable Being.6. Therefore, Allah is not God.I started my arguments by attacking the step 4 of syllogism. I have shown that loving evil-doers is not a requirement for moral perfection. In fact, I have shown that loving evil-doers will be against the principle of justice. Further I have also shown that the position of bible (both OT and NT) in this regard is same. I have also shown that Allah loves those evil-doers who repent - which is perfectly correct. My opponent has failed to contest any of these points.Since his arguments constitute a syllogism, negating one point is sufficient to negate the whole argument. I have negated point 4. Consequently his complete argument is negated.2. Love and punishment: My opponent thinks it is OK for God to condemn sinners - who do not repent - to 'eternal destruction' with 'flaming fire'. (2nd Thessalonians - 1: 9 and 10). However as per him 'God must love evil-doers' to be morally perfect!Imagine a husband beating his wife. And he keeps beating her without stop. And he declares in between - while continuing with the beatings - that he loves her. Is this the concept of 'all-loving' about which our Christian brothers and sisters talk so much? Would my friend consider this husband to be morally perfect!3. All-Loving God: Let me present the correct concept of 'All-loving God' (which is valid in both Christianity and Islam). Suppose X is a big sinner. Her believing friend Y asks her to correct herself. X says that since she has committed so many sins - it is pointless for her to start believing at this stage. Y will tell her not to worry. Y will tell her that God loves X no matter how many sins she has committed . If X turns to God even now, God will welcome her like a lost child and she will be saved.Y will never tell X to continue living in sins because an 'All-loving' God cannot punish her. Indeed, if X refuses to listen and dies in sin - she will be punished.So when we emphasis the 'All-loving' nature of God, we are emphasising that God immediately accepts those who repent. This concept is identical in Islam and Christianity. This does not subtract anything from the moral perfection of God. Rather it is a beautiful example of God's justice - with mercy and salvation for all those who ask.4. Some verses: Dimmitri has made a weird claim , 'Baggins has cut his own argument short by failing to quote the texts in full.' In reality I quoted more than what was required - so that everyone is able to examine the context of verses themselves.Commenting on Deuteronomy, my opponent opines:'Yet, Baggins believes that the Christian God is comparable to that of the Islamic God based on the rewards the nation of Israel received for its obedience'Children of Israel are indeed blessed by God - as has been confirmed by Quran - so I am never going to contest any honor that they were given. In reality my focus was on Deut 7:10 (as I think will obvious to any unbiased reader)Deut 7:10And repayeth them that hate him to their face, to destroy them: he will not be slack to him that hateth him, he will repay him to his face.God informs children of Israel (Jews) that God has chosen them for blessings not because of their numbers (or power). God has selected them so that they may love God and uphold his commandments - and if they do so they will be rewarded. In the verse I have highlighted above God warns them that if they hate God (and disobey commandments), they will be destroyed and God will repay them (take revenge).I hope you notice - this same as the message of Quran. Incidentally the message is true for Jews today also. If only they pay a little more attention to keeping the commandments...Talking about John 3: Dimmitri has further stated..."what Baggins has failed to understand is that the declaration made within John 3 supports the claim for the divinity of Jesus Christ."I had explained that divinity of Jesus (Peace on Him) is not the issue of this debate. My focus was on next verse...John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.If God loves everyone, why does God condemn those who do not believe in Jesus (Peace on Him) to eternal condemnation. My opponent failed to elucidate on this point.== Conclusion ==1. I have negated Pro's syllogism by showing that God need not love evil-doers to be morally perfect.2. I further proved that the policy of God towards evil-doers is same as that in Christianity (in both OT and NT), i.e. love for those who repent, condemnation for those who don't.I was tasked with defending adequacy of concept of God in Islam. I have exceeded that and upheld the concept of God in all Abraham religions by the standards of logic.Vote CON===========Best of luck to Dimmitri for his future debatesPeace