Three issues against North Korea.

Thanks, hope this will be a good debate. Note to reader: I'm am not Pro Korea I just need two more wins so don't think of me as Kim Yong. Also Note: This was done in just less than 2 hours so "eek". _________ Argument _________ A.) The proposed peace treaty between North Korea and the United States should be rejected. A A.)For those you do not know the current proposed Treaty is one between North Korea and America BY NORTH KOREA. The reason I stress follows soon. The Current Treaty is in Benefit to the US and other States, this treaty, much to misconception is NOT for: -Vassalage (to America) in the event of war. -American sovereignty or "blind eye" action in the event of war. -Military Alliance and Military Access. -Acceptance of the Non Existence of Human rights. (It's stupid but some people think so). The purposed treaty is much like the Cold War Yalta treaty. The Treaty purposed is for the recreation of the Post Korean Civil War 6 Nation Union, consisting of North Korea, South Korea, Japan, Russia and the USA. The Treaty is for open talks and for co-understanding, something in the interest of both Nations. This Treaty can potentially help those in need in North Korea, to reject on the grounds of supposed Human rights is illogical. [Citation: "The removal of the barrier of such discrimination and distrust as sanctions may soon lead to the opening of the six-party talks."- Official Korean Central News Agency Foreign minister] [Citation: http://www.guardian.co.uk... // I know it's questionable as a Media article but I was short of time.] B.) The ICC (International Criminal Court) should issue an arrest warrant for Kim Jong-Il (or the triumvirate of Kim Jong-Il, Kim Yong-Il and Kim Yong-nam) and pursue prosecution against him for crimes against humanity. A B.) Pro has the burden the Prove Kim Jong-Il, Kim Yong-Il and Kim Yong-Nam gave done anything against their own nation and be even questioned for Crimes against humanity. The Triumvirate have not: Ordered the genocide on any Asian Ethnic Groups. Directly ordered the mass killing of anyone. Stayed inactive in the Mass starvation after the Korean Civil War. Do not mistake that I am oblivious to the actions in War by Korea's Dictators however these actions do not account for Execution as is the punishment for crimes against humanity, he is as accountable as George Bush, Tony Blair, Winston Churchill, Porfirio Dï¿½az or Henri Navarre. C.) The UN should, if necessary, reject its procedures and violate North Korea's national sovereignty to take action against it (including arrest and prosecution of the leaders). A C.) --Military action-- I don't think anyone in the right mind would what to attack North Korea at its current state. North Korea holds the 4th biggest Military in the world [Citation: http://en.wikipedia.org...] [Census: Cordesman & Kleiber], not to mention their Missile and Nuclear capabilities. Even If you wish to risk nuclear war winter in the name of "Human rights" you'll just get angry American Citizens--> people hate you --> revolution. Besides, that it's was affirmed in the Cold War that you do not risk Nuclear war for the Wars of the "Rich". Wars of the "Rich" Iraq UN peace keeping Wars Imperialist Wars (ei. Russian Expanse) Colonist Wars(ei, Indochina War French side) Most WWI Campaigns Wars of the "poor" Revolutions (American Independence) Most Civil Wars (Sudanese CW) WWII A war for Human rights of a foreign country is an unnecessary war. --Economic action— Economic Sanctions are an argued action against Nations. As you would agree on the Citizens of North Korea are not the richest or happiest people on earth it makes no sense to make them poorer. --Leaders (see B) -- -------------------------------------- All for now.