Solving the obesity problem - my method

Unfortunatly I dont have alot of time, so this will have to be short. 1. I am still pressing the point that sunburning people to death is less humane then burning them to death. Being sunburnt to death is a prolonged slow killing. They would slowly die in about 3 days. Its better to have the ridiculing. And how would you sunburn them to death? Without tying them to something? or dumping them in a desert? Transporting the people would still be affecting the environment. My plan is beter, because not only does it dissuade people from becoming obese more effectively, it's very funny at the same time 2. "In all reality being dehumanized is far worse than simply being killed". No it isn't! Your still alive arn't you? Your not just carted off and killed like some animal! So MY method is more humane, it is far kinder to the fatties then the harshness of being killed off. 3. Dogs DO require just as much nutrition as humans, but not the same type of Nutrition. They still need Proteins, Amino Acids, Fats and Fatty Acids, Vitamins and Minerals. The obese people would simply not provide this and would not create a healthy balanced diet for dogs. And your still using wood, as unless you transported everyone to the same place and used the same stake of wood your going to still use wood. This would have serious implications for the unfortunate area (manholes etc.) 4. 6.5 Billion people on this earth. Yes thats true, but not all of these people even have a T.V. In fact most of them acnt afford one. So they wouldnt be watching the show anyway. Only people with T.V's would have to get the kinetic bicycle machiene, and they are in a minority anyway. So its not an impossibility, you dont know how much money I could have. So its a slight possibility, therefore I win this one :P Also Did You Know that only 1% of the total population owns a computer? I cannot imagine this figure being alot higher for TV ownership. 5. Well, prove it then! You are SO a dog. Good boy! Sit... SIT! 6. This point is simply not valied seeing as you are a dog. I couldnt read it through all the drool and paw marks. So not only are you a dog, but a sloppy one at that. 7. Dog armies eh? Dogs would be incapable at fighting as well as humans, even if trained from birth the animals would not create a substantial army. And anyway, in wars and such, this would mean that the invading dogs would probably go through the opposing contrys villages and such. It would be incredibly easy to stop the attack, as all you would have to do was shout "here boy, come get some bacon!" and the entire army would collapse. You must agree with this, being a dog yourself (and how did they teach you to type? you had almost fooled me into thinking you were a human back there) 8. "I'm not sure where my opponent is coming from with this one" well clearly YOU wouldn't, your a dog! Vote Pro, this dog clearly needs to be taken on a looong walk 9-10 These points are ignored as your plan has no guarentee that it will lead to a Jedi Nation. So they are simply irrelevant Vote Pro, or you will simply prove that this website has (literally) gone to the dogs. And thanks Yraelz for an exciting debate :D