Homosexuality is Morally Wrong, Therefore Unjust, Gay Marriage must therefore be illegal.

The soldier is not the issue. Perhaps you can challenge me or someone else to this debate on another time. Perhaps both are immoral, perhaps the soldier is moral. I am not deciding this issue. A straight couple is not the issue. Perhaps you can challenge me or someone else to this debate on another time. Perhaps both are immoral, perhaps a straight family choosing not to have kids is moral. I am not deciding this issue. In Vitro Fertilization is risky, 30% of them are complicated by Ovarian Hyper Stimulation Syndrome. We have accepted adoption is a possibility. Yet it does not explain the moral state of the adopter(s). The issue is homosexuality. Comparing homosexuality to a soldier, to a straight couple who chooses not to have children, or to miscarriage does not increase or decrease the morality of any of these issues. Your argument in its entirety has been based on distraction. I'm not saying you support homosexuality as immoral, but through your lack of sufficient argument, one must wonder. Quite possibly you believe my point to be true, but would rather provide confusion than concede. I conclude with this. Homosexuals are great people, beautiful people, I believe many homosexuals raise great families, make great parents, and contribute in many ways to a society of love, adornment, caring, and acceptance. Their lack of morality does not cause them to lack great qualities, they are great assets to America. Some see them as different, I see them as American, what else is an American if not someone different. All Americans have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. All Americans also have a right to a government who's judicial system will always uphold that which is just and moral. A government which will not excuse a good man, simply because he has many good qualities. The judicial system has one duty. To deliver and uphold that which is Just. Do not be fooled by distraction. Look only at what is evident. Homosexuals are great and beautiful people, however they possess a natural difference which keeps them from acting entirely morally good. We as people must love homosexuals and accept them as people, but the government must not encourage that which would encourage the stagnation of its people. In this case, the government is forced to do what people hate, it must limit what a natural born citizen assumed he or she had the right to do. It must not remove the right to marry, but it must make certain that while encouraging love and marriage. It does not encourage stagnation of our population. I must regretfully say my argument holds, that the courts must outlaw gay marriage, but people must be accepting of homosexuality. If my opponent wishes to refute this, let him prove one thing. It is understood and conceded that homosexuals are able to contribute to the betterment of society. It is understood that they possess many moral attributes. However, to refute my argument, and thus enlighten myself and those watching. We must have proof of one thing. If no proof can be furnished, you must concede. If adequate proof is furnished, I will concede happily. Prove: Homosexuality contributes to the growth of the population, thus homosexuals do not contribute to stagnation, thus homosexuals are not immoral. If there is no adequate proof, then the opposite must be true. To address anything other than this issue is resorting again to illusion and confusion.