gravity, reality, are not facts, are not theories

if gravity didnt exist out side of facts, facts about gravity could not exist.Gravity exists only in the facts of observing it. It exists only in the way it influences the world (the observer being other material objects). Gravity does not exist outside of this observation. Its affect on the world is its only basis for existence. Facts about gravity could not exist if gravity did not exist. Gravity can not exist without the facts about it. It exists only as a set of relationships between parts. Physical laws only exist insofar as they describe the relationships or interactions between physical things. They don't exist apart from those physical things. Gravity does not exist separate from the physical things- the facts of the interaction are its essential nature. Gravity exists only in the facts of the observations about it. It doesn't have an essential nature outside of the observations about it. It is based on the facts. you are taking past and now as matter.. now is matter, past is not matter. observation is now and past observation is not now, not realI am hearing you say that the past does not matter- only the present does. You are suggesting that the past observations are not in the present, and therefore hold less validity than observations in the present. According to this, gravity exists outside of the past and in the present, which gives it credentials outside of those historic facts.When you read something, when you see something, when you hear something- it takes time from the transpiring of the event to your perception of it. It takes time for the light to travel to your eye, or for the sound to reach your ear. We can only see the past. We see a past which is frequently quite close, but it is never in the present. We do not live in the present, and can never perceive the present, outside of our own thoughts. According to your line of reasoning, the only reality would be our own thoughts, since everything else took place in the past. This line of reasoning within its own framework proves that gravity itself is not real, since our perception of it is in the past. It is left as a bystander in this view of the world, and has lost its fundamental nature because you suggest that things in the past hold less weight than those in the present. The only things that actually take place in the present our thoughts.you got it wrong m8, all knowlege i have involves gravity, dosnt mean gravity is a memory..The place where you go wrong is where you assert that scientific ideas exist outside of their facts and theories. Scientific ideas only exist insofar as they have facts and theories. The essential nature of science is to take observations, measure, and predict. There do exist concepts which occur outside of observation, measurement, and prediction- but they are not science. They are belief. So I am hearing you say you believe in gravity, outside of observation. Your belief does not make it an objective truth, it makes it a subjective truth. You may be able to get other people to believe that things exist outside of observation, but that does not grant it truth. It merely means you are a good orator. You can assert that gravity also is responsible for individual good and bad luck. This would also be a subjective truth, not an objective truth. Any aspect of gravity you state that exists outsides of fact and observation will be reduced to a subjective truth. Perhaps a compelling one that you wish to believe in. Fortune tellers are also compelling. You can believe in them, but that does not mean they can actually predict the future. I am hearing you say that gravity has an essential reality outside of how it influences physical objects. This is a subjective truth, not an objective one.