BeIR/webis-touche2020 huggingface dataset:
The necessity of detoxing.

Claims regarding the need to rid your body of toxins are found in nearly every corner of the internet, as well as other media sources and many natural healers. Generally the claim is something to the effect of this; Your body builds up and stores toxins, and they are potentially harmful less they be flushed out. While some may see this as a good health practice, I remain unconvinced that this is anything more than snake oil. If you believe you can convince me otherwise, and do so in a civilized manner, then please accept my challenge. Also, if you accept this be prepared to site any sources for information that you're posting about and define any ambiguous terms, I will do the same.
The average girl is less into music than the average boy

1)Of course a female is capable of listening to piano music too. Like I said as a musician myself (Who plays piano along with my sister) I have a broad range of musical interests. Just because I don't like the songs you posted does not mean I like music any less than you. I mean, you didn't seem to enjoy the music I posted, does this mean you like music any less than me? Obviously not.You have to take into account solo musicians as well as bands. Think of female singers compared to male solo artists. People can name tons. Adele, Cheyl Cole, Britney Spears, Shakira, Rihanna, Beyonce etc. 2) Have you ever written music before? From my personal experience (And level 2 Btec performing arts grade Distinction) There are many ways to write a song. But one of them is to write a 'poem' as you insist that lyrics are, and then add a melody afterwards.Also my love for lyrics, poetry and touching words in no way proves that I do not love music. Why would I be a musician if I didn't love music? I defend these 'decorations' as you insist they are because they are still part of music. Music is not simply a melody. music G2;mjuH0;z=8;k/ noun 1. vocal or instrumental sounds (or both) combined in such a way as to produce beauty of form, harmony, and expression of emotion. "couples were dancing to the music" synonyms: notes, strains, tones, chords, sound; More 2. the written or printed signs representing vocal or instrumental sound. "Tony learned to read music" Pro, vocals, also known as lyrics, are literally in the definition of music.3) 1. First you talk about what I think the best song of all time is, and then you ask about the top dogs.2. This question isn't being dropped because I didn't give a perspective, this question is being dropped because pro has realised that semantics are no way to go about a debate like this.3. I have not avoided the question at all. I have asserted the fact that once again you were using semantics.4. There is nothing to say I didn't notice the reduced melody, you'd have to be deaf not to notice that there are less of the original melody lines, my point is that people don't have to like songs solely for the melody as you seem to claim. In conclusion:My point is clearly proven in the above arguments that females can appreciate music as much as males. My opponent tries to prove his points by having a twisted definition of what makes music, using semantics to purposely try to get answers that emphasise his point and by cleary disregarding certain vital parts of pieces of music, leaving a biased and close-minded view on the arts. I have enjoyed this debate very much and my opponent is certainly a very opinionated man! Kudos to you, Sir, I hope to debate you again in the future.Vote Con!!
The average girl is less into music than the average boy

1) Passion Pit.Pro's argument is completely redundant when he says that boys are capable of listening to rough music, ugly vocals and are capable of completely ignoring the lyrics. Firstly, the lyrics aren't there to be ignored. Secondly, females are completely capable of this too. Take my older sister for example, she is 19 and her favourite bands are slipknot, 3 days grace, shinedown, heavy young heathens, and many other bands like this. As to more boys being in bands than girls, this is also not true. Many girls are just as interested in music as boys.2) Modest Mouse Pro has completely misunderstood. I know this is a poem, my point was listen to the lyrics to blue moon at the beginning of the video compared to the poem that comes after. They sound entirely different. I'm not talking about the music that backs up the poem or the poem itself I'm talking about how lyrics carry a melody of their own and are more than just poetry. On to Con's replies.1. Of course I know who the top dogs in music are, but popularity does not define who is the best subjectively. Asking who the top dogs are is an entirely different question to asking what I think the best song of all time is, and I would appreciate it if my opponents stops changing his questions after I've answered.2. Using semantics to get a certain answer from your opponent isn't exactly fair. If you ask what I do, then of course I'm not going to say nothing. After all doing nothing isn't doing something. Of course I spend time just listening to music or laying in bed with music playing but that's not doing anything while listening to music is it? After all it should be taken into consideration that my opponent asked "What do you do when you listen to music." But then said I should have answered "Listening to music." If he is willing to use semantics against me I will use semantics against him. That answer doesn't make sense following the question does it? What do you do when listening to music? Listening to music. Hm?3. Once again my opponent is changing his question after I've answered. First he claims it's a song with absolutely no decoration. Then he says it's a song with little decoration. Ans yes, I am bored by hearing a melody with very little variety, because it shows a lack of talent, creativity and expression. 4. I knew good and well my opponent was going to say a true music fan would choose the original, but does this not show my opponent just likes to follow the trends, trying to stay cool and edgy by saying the only way is the original way? Original music is not always superior my friend.
The average girl is less into music than the average boy

ONLY GIRLS UP TO THE AGE OF 20 CAN ACCEPT! The title of this debate is a feeling I got, but ofcourse it doesn't count as much for adults. Neither can I prove it by any statistics... So, I'll try to prove that you, my opponent, is less into music than the average boy of your age! Pretty bold I think, not knowing who my opponent will be... First off, what will we consider "into music"? How do we measure that? We will measure it by the time spent on music, and the interest in music. Again, I have no statistics of how often an average boy would listen to music or on what conditions he would do that. All I can do, is try to disprove that my opponent truly has as much love for music as she thinks she does. Secondly, what do we understand under "music"? We will mainly be working with songs. Songs consist of A: Music (melody & rhythm, nothing else) B: Decorations (everything that is not part of the music) As you can guess, I will try to prove that my opponent leans more towards the B-side when liking a song. But now that I said that, I hope my opponent will still be honest when saying why she loves her music. TO THE CHOSEN OPPONENT WHO HAS COME SO FAR TO NOT BE BORED TO DEATH BY THE RULES! You will use your first round to do something very fun: show us your favourite songs, bands, musicians, use youtube links, tell us why you like them (!) and do this in whatever way you like. Try varying up the genres so we get a good idea what your musical personality is. If you play an instrument, toss that in too! One condition though: you must show at least one song you hate as well (with a good explanation why). I'm truly looking forward to this. I know I would not be able to prove the headline of the debate by doing this, but I do hope a self-assured girl shows up that becomes the ultimate test to my very daring statement. Don't accept this if you won't finish it!
End Prohibition, Drugs Become Public Health Issue

This debate will argue the current standards in the United States and Canada. I believe drug abuse should be a public health issue, which means users and abusers do not face criminal penalties, but are offered treatment for their addiction in an open ended, government funded center. This would remove much of the racial stereotype seen with arrests for possession of illegal drugs. This would save billions of dollars in police processing fees, court fees, incarceration fees, and potential recidivism costs. Money would also be saved with the end of prohibition world wide, including all border regions, bribe costs to maintain prohibition, less violence and therefor less collateral damage to pay for, ect. These savings would go towards prevention methods, which would be intelligent and factual pieces of information spanning across all forms of media and entertainment in order to educate ages child to adult. By removing prohibition, the existence of the black market would dwindle considerably as see with the end of alcohol prohibition, and the move into a legal and regulated market. ======= I'll end this now to keep it open ended for con, however I must insist the con argues for the current system in place, not his own ideology.
End Prohibition, Drugs Become Public Health Issue

My opponent has not addressed several salient points I made in the former round, in conclusion though the health problems associated with cannabis are debatable, and though there would be certain social benefits as a result of legalisation (e. g. weakening of organised crime, gang violence) my opponent has failed to explain how society would overall benefit from easy access to hard substances such as heroin. This clearly is not a drug that could be licensed and regulated, even countries with liberal drug policies would not indulge this. Thus I strongly urge a Con vote.
End Prohibition, Drugs Become Public Health Issue

I think my opponent posted a good argument in 40 minutes! Firstly my opponent challenges the negativity of cannabis, and it argues that it can have beneficial effects. Now the fact it is harmful is not in doubt, there have been innumerable studies that confirm this, everyone who knows a social group who habitually smokes cannabis is aware of one of more people who has suffered permanent or at least long lasting damage to their mental health. Now it is perfectly possible that in addition to this it may assist the body in other conditions, so surely a better system is to retain it as an illegal drug, which still allows for authorised facilities to study it. "For instance, psychedelic mushrooms, mescalin, LSD, MDMA, none of these drugs will kill you, and you cannot overdose on them" Hallucinogenic drugs are dangerous due to their halluncinatory properties, physical injury or psychological damage are both possible outcomes. LSD can cause flashbacks years later that could occur when the person is driving a car, flying a plane, or performing a triple heart bypass. http://www.healthunit.org... On regards drugs and crime. "This is preposterous, you cannot make such a claim. If a drug addict cannot get his "fix" in a legal market, he wouldn't be able to get it in an illegal market anyways. Drugs being in a legal market would make purchasing it more safe, and more reliable. I argue that alcoholics who cannot afford alcohol do not all turn to crime like you suggest, since alcohol is a drug." My opponent simply can not deny that addicts resort to crime to support their habit, this is a clear and obvious fact and is always raised in these debates. "A drug that impairs your ability to think and move properly while being a toxin to your body, harming your brain and liver is currently on the market. A drug that causes the US and Canada billions in health care and kills millions is currently on the market. However if these drugs were illegal, they would kill even more people. We have room to make all drugs legal, and properly educate people on the effects of using them. Them being illegal absolutely does not lower usage rates." We are going to going around in circles on certain issues so I want to cut to the chase as it were and address heroin, possibly the most severe of the drugs in question. The legalisation of heroin would increase usage rates. Through the natural competition of differing and dealers prices would come down, people would consider the use of heroin to be legitimate. It can be instantly addictive. A heroin addict is unable to hold down a job, it is not an addiction you can really manage, this in turns increase the crime rate. How can there be a moral or legal case for the legalisation of heroin? (For more information on heroin, http://en.wikipedia.org...).
SEO to make sure it reads Golden Go

Dave had a fuzzy widget! No kidding. He questioned the backward density of matter, he hesitated and felt better out of the blue. G.G.G. extreme density fluctuations applicator optional. Phrasing lazing dazing, threeway spiritual fluctuations , why hesitate? Out of the drawer, out of the door not before a firstry, secondary sometimes on the cards you just can't be sure. It's a 10% chance there or thereabouts. SEO subculture for sure, the keywords are density fluctuations at a ratio of 3 to the power of luck. Dave approached an agreeable relationship too. The stream was channelled into a main and certainly resulted in exploitation, whereas a culture was appropriate. High end, high drama particles, dog leads domination subculture, another drawer in the basement. Demi size commercial novel writing ideas, ideally classified under E for evolution obviously. Connotations didn't go unnoticed and the fundus was mental without a doubt. Submarine culture, yoghurt culture in the fridge, commercial yoghurt applications, threeway yoghurt applications, yig yog yoo. The cat was walking in Hungary, threeway Danubian bliss, bliss bloss bloo. Sophie hissed at Kate, she was dictating unjustly and Fifi did a World tour. She had a stiff bottom and was always recycling her shoes through distribution networks. Cycling along the Danube cat watching pedal interface, clip in no straps loose straps, flip flap, flip flop floo threeway interfacial presentation, specialized is one brand for sure, global dispersal, or though ticks can be a pressure problem in the undergrowth on the trail or in the woods. Lyme disease, lymeswold, limescale, threeway commercial cheese production artisan contempt. Garage the car get out the bike slip on your shoes, don't toy with cardboard recycling, threeway cardboard interface, bix box boo. Carbon interface for sure, match with a cut off top and Bob's your uncle, Fanny's your aunty. Long ride and contact the paper, newspaper contact promotion, show it off milky milky know what I mean. Top drawer, high end decorations in the bedroom, on the landing, down the stairs, top drawer accessorize. Talking about the kitchen, milk in the fridge and Val was bubbly, bottle of bubbly and she was saucy too, 10 minutes and juicy, got me! In the kitchen on the table, where's the zucchini, bring on the cucumber, bring on the aubergine, threeway vegetable ramifications. Surface washdown, she's not chicken, G.G.G. lubrication applicator supplied. All the tricks, one foot, arched back, high as a kite. in the flat up the stairs in the basement it varies, high end top drawer accessories are the requirement. Stiletto the only option in these situations, stiletto, running shoe juxtaposition, basement fantasy. Threeway fantasy whick whack woo. Pseudo Fifi determination.
SEO to make sure it reads Golden Go

Back to the question: does keyword density matter kinda. If you want to rank for the phrase [fuzzy blue widgets], you had better have the phrase [fuzzy blue widgets] on your page. While I hesitate to give a number, if you have a [url=http://www.goldengooser.com...]Golden Goose[/url] keyword density that approaches or goes over 10% you should probably give it to a non SEO to make sure it reads like natural language. Subcultures have often endured a less than agreeable relationship with the mainstream as a result of exploitation and cultural appropriation. This often leads to the demise or evolution of a particular subculture once the originally novel ideas have been commercially popularised to an extent where the ideologies of the subculture have lost their fundamental connotations. The insatiable commercial hunger for new trends instigated the counterfeiting of subculture fashion, unjustifiably used on the sophisticated catwalks in fashion dictatorships of Paris, Milan and New York. This pressure can come from tight shoes, flexible soles or small pedals. If your cycling shoes fit properly, loosening the straps can help relieve some of the pressure. On long rides, choose cycling shoes that have a stiff bottom to distribute the pressure, or insert specialized orthotics into your shoes to disperse the pressure. Cardboard milk cartons can be made into garages for toy cars. Cut off the top of the milk carton and wash it well. It can be covered in construction paper, or contact paper, to decorate it. The whole dish cooks in about 10 minutes but results in juicy chicken, tender Broccolini, and a thick and bubbly sauce. For instance, if someone is flat footed or has a high arch, the choice of shoes will vary based on this requirement. The trick to finding the right running shoe is to determine what kind of running you do or plan to do. [url=http://www.goldengooser.com...]Golden Goose Sale[/url]
It's time for the United States to finally adopt the Metric System

I would expect awareness of the change in the meter, and gram, to be common knowledge. After all it was the 0.2 micrometer difference in the platinum bars used in the 1886 standard that prompted the need to create a more definitive standard[8]. At least the meter had a fix by switching to a definition based on light. The gram hasn't been so fortunate, and has been in a state of constant change since it was invented[9]. If Pro's position that a decimal version of time failed because 2 hours and 24 minutes is less confusing than 100 beats in beat time, or 1 hour in decimal time for one tenth of a day. It seems to refute Pro's own argument that decimal is less confusing. It's good Pro finally brought up some evidence to try and support their claim that the English System has set the US back. For those not familiar the Mars Climate Orbiter failed due to a component outputting pound-seconds instead of Newton-seconds as NASA had requested. As much as it may seem that this was a failure of the dual system this was really a failure quality assurance. Had NASA properly tested the components to ensure they weren't just miss calibrated the problem would have been spotted before the orbiter was even launched. The same issue would have occurred had the component been 10 Newton-seconds off, and if that had happened no one would be blaming the metric system. Poor QA, and nothing more. Pros first argument that "everyone uses decimal therefore use metric" is little more than an ad populum argument. Arguments 2, 3, and 4 can be summed up as "fractions are hard", and I countered with fractions are a basic fundamental of mathematics, and regular use will push our knowledge further. Argument 5 was counted with the purpose of fractions in mathematics which is to preserve precision were decimal has always had the stigma of rounding errors. Anyone familiar with Gold knows that the troy ounce is actually very common, and more people use points because it's what fonts are measured in. Both are de facto standards used even by metric followers because typographers are more stubborn than Americans, and no one likes melting down gold just to stamp it with a new weight. The loss in micro grams of gold would far outweigh the cost of doing the simple math to convert to tonne, the metric standard for gold. Any advantages posed by the metric system are already present in the US dual system. The US isn't at any disadvantage. Everyone learns both systems in school. Mistakes that appear to be caused by the duality were in actuality caused by incompetent QA processes that would have eventually resulted in major losses regardless of the system used. Pro presents no real advantages to change, and presents reduced math skill from fear of fractions. The status quo should be upheld, and thank you for your time. [8] Contemporary Physics, vol. 3, issue 6, pp. 415-434 [9] http://www.npr.org...
It's time for the United States to finally adopt the Metric System

Con fails to refute the original reasons used to defend the metric system that I have provided. This is not exactly a minor point, since the entire foundation of the metric system stands on them. As for Decimal Time, there are 2 reasons that explain why it was rejected:1) Unlike the chaotic state that other unities found themselves in XVIII century Europe, as explained in my previous argument, the sexagesimal division of time was used by most of the world since Ancient Egypt and Babylon [8], people everywhere spoke the same language when talking about time - and that's another reason for the US adopt the metric system: it's an universal language that most Americans don't speak2) Because calling a tenth of a day (which is about 2,5 sexagesimal hours) an hour created a lot of confusion with the terms [9]I invite Con to join me in a debate about decimal time in the future, but now we should stick to the metric systemUnlike con arguments, the use of both metric and English unities have caused a series of confusions and problems, including the loss of a $327.6 million space probe [10]. Besides, since American products are set in the English system, while foreign products are in metric, a lot of money is wasted in conversions for both importation and exportation. Pro claims there are different versions of the meter. However his source says that the actual value of the meter has never changed [11]. The same can't be said of English unities [12]. Con hasn't disproved any of the 5 arguments I gave in favor of the superiority of decimal system. Instead, he claims that fractions are better because they are more accurate when you have to divide a number by 3 and then multiply it again by 3. This type of calculation is completely unnecessary, once you'll end up with the same number you had before. Con is right about the existence of unities smaller than the inch; I've never seen them being used, though, especially in science. I should rephrase the sentence I used in the previous round, what I meant was that there is no other commonly used 12-base English unity. In his argument, con presents us with other obscure English unities, the troy pound and ounce. Those are completely different from the regular (or avoirdupois) pound and ounce, yet, have the same name. This highlights the confusion inherent to the English system. Which by the way is the same type of confusion that lead the decimal time to be abolished by the French 200 years ago. That being said, I believe I have successfully proved the superiority of the metric system, therefore, vote pro. [8] - . http://en.wikipedia.org...;[9] - . http://www.decimaltime.hynes.net...[10] - . http://en.wikipedia.org...[11] - . http://condor.depaul.edu...[12] - . http://en.wikipedia.org...