Resolved: Mitt Romney would make a better, more effective president than Mitt Romney.

For this debate I will be arguing that MITT Romney, the fiscal conservative who has great plans for this country should he become president, would make a much better president then Mitt ROMNEY, that a**hole traditionalist multi-millionaire. ============================================================================ First lets look at the character of MITT Romney. MITT Romney is a conservative who knows that we need to be fiscally responsible for the sake of the economy and the debt. MITT Romney, is as we all know, a businessman who quickly rose to the top due to his management skills and successful utilization of resources to make other companies more profitable. When you compare that to Mitt ROMNEY, the vulture capitalist who makes his millions by gutting bankrupt companies for his own profit and ships jobs off overseas, it shows that compared to Mitt ROMNEY, MITT Romney is the right man for the job who knows that the economy begins at home, and job creation is vital to get America back on track, unlike Mitt ROMNEY. ============================================================================ Lets look at the achievements of MITT Romney outside of his experience at Bain Capital. MITT Romney as we all know was behind the successful holding of the 2002 Paralympic games in Salt Lake City Utah, an event that was in trouble due to lack of funding and large budgets. MITT Romney showed his skills in management by raising money from new sponsors, being fiscally responsible by reducing needless spending, and revamped the organizations leadership. Lets compare that to what Mitt ROMNEY did at the same Paralympic games. Mitt ROMNEY took corporate handouts from numerous companies which allowed him to make easy (probably blood soaked) money to fund the games, he also gutted spending in many areas with disregard to what might happen, and he completely overhauled the leadership in the games as well. Clearly, MITT Romney knows how to work with people much better than Mitt ROMNEY. ============================================================================ Lets look at the rest of MITT Romney's record prior to his presidential campaign and compare it to that of Mitt ROMNEY's record. MITT Romney spent time in France as part of a mormon missionary so we know hes had experience handling foreign matters overseas. He was governor of Massachusetts for four years in which he declined to have a salary, pioneered a new healthcare system for the state called Romneycare, and he gave the state a balanced budget in his last two years in office. At the beginning of his term he was facing huge budget shortfalls but he turned everything around in a manner of a few years Mitt ROMNEY on the other hand ruled with an iron fist while he was Governor. Mitt ROMNEY raised fees on everything from gasoline to driver license applications, he eliminated tax loopholes on corporations in the state forcing them to pay more, his healthcare idea sparked the infamous Obamacare which is an exact copy of Romneycare that was implemented nationwide, and lastly he completely flip flopped on abortion switching from pro choice to pro life. Judging just from their experiences as Governor, MITT Romney is a much better person to have in charge then that dingus Mitt ROMNEY. ============================================================================ It is also worth noting that MITT Romney has no noteworthy scandals that could potentially harm him in a Presidential election, Mitt ROMNEY on the other hand has some skeletons in his closet that arent getting nearly as enough attention as they should be. Most people dont know that Mitt ROMNEY was arrested in 1981 and has shown to have a history of animal abuse when he made his dog sit on the roof of his car for a long trip to Canada (Which begs the question, why would he go to Canada? Does he hate America?) ============================================================================ Lets look at the presidential campaigns of MITT Romney and Mitt ROMNEY. Both of them ran for president back in 2008 and neither of them won. Lets examine the campaigns of both of them though. MITT Romney ran for president and relied extensively on his success in business, management, and as a governor to justify why he would be a good choice. Mitt ROMNEY on the other hand faced controversy since he was Governor of one of the most liberal states in America and had stances on issues that did not go along with what his party believed. (Talk about not being a team player :P) While running for president, MITT Romney started off to a bad start but when he won the Michigan Primary he became a legitimate threat. Romney though lost the crucial Florida primary to McCain by 5% and many people began to abandon him even though he still had a shot. Romney went on to win 11 primaries but he was still forced to drop out and endorse McCain. As for Mitt ROMNEY, hell its like we're talking about a different campaign! Mitt ROMNEY consistently polled around 10% at the start of 2007 which is like Rick Perry bad, and he was painted as a serial flip flopper which embarrassed him. Romney though was an arrogant f*cktard who at the end of this miserable campaign ended up spending a whopping $110 MILLION, and $45 Million of it was HIS OWN MONEY. Talk about refusing to see reality before it was too late.... MITT Romney ended up losing the campaign for the nomination fair and square and soon faded into obscurity, Mitt ROMNEY on the other hand was hoping to be McCain's pick for Vice president, but Sarah Palin beat him to it. What does it say about Mitt ROMNEY when Sarah Palin is seen as a BETTER choice? I shudder to think about it ============================================================================ I will go into detail about MITT Romney's 2012 campaign in round 3, and then compare that to Mitt ROMNEY'S Presidential campaign during the same time period....